Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
06/02/1981 - City Council Regular
' a+w•...J+•.....tn.1 M1.i.ws.{iriTir aa. v✓• 'aa AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL JUNE 2, 1981 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE :II. 6:33 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:35 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS fA A. Fire Department Q� � C. Park Department f- \ B. Police Department Q,1 D. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT ITEMS (One Motion Approves All Items) ?.Or A. Contract 79-13, Project 241 - Final Payment/Acceptance (Dodd Road Area Utilities) Qa A- B. Change Order #1, Contract 80-26 (Safari Estates Streets) e,4 C. Change Order #1, Contract 80-31 (Univac Tower Painting) Q SD. County Contract 31-05, City Trailway Construction Resolution E. Transfer of Utility Easement to MnDOT F. Employment of Nancy Ohm - Clerk Typist V. 4 G. Employment of Summer Recreation Staff & H. Leave of Absence - Penny Micklus (Police Dispatcher) p -71. Termination of Fire Contract with the City of Inver Grove Heights '1J. Trailer Permit Renewals P•11 K. School Facilities Committee Appointment P1Z,L. LAWCON Resolution in Support of Funding V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Project #302 - Storm Sewer for I-494 & I35E Intersection & Pond FP-1 Area PA- B. Project #333 - Sanitary Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer & Streets Improvements for Pilot Knob Center VI. OLD BUSINESS Q 3 7 A. Jeffrey R. Bloom for a Waiver of Plat in Order to Split Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition Q 39 B. Zeco Company for a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Outside Storage in an I-1 (Light Industrial District) Located at 3815 Cedar Ave. U. S. Homes Corporation for Rezoning from R-4 to R-3 Consisting 42. C. of approximately 59 acres and for Preliminary Plat Approval of Lexington Addition Consisting of Approximately' 82 Acres, both Located in Part of the W� of the W of Section 14 Eagan City Council Agenda June 2, 1981 Page Two VII. NEW BUSINESS 44 A. Zachman Homes, Inc. , for Rezoning from R-2 (Residential Double District) and R-4 (Residental Multiple District) to P.D. (Planned Development District) and for Preliminary Plat of Cinnamon Ridge Consisting of Approximately 72 Acres Located in the W' of the SWk, Section 30 e . 7 Z B. Al Harp for a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Outside Storage located on Lot 4, Block 2, Halley's 1st Addition, Section 36 -71 C. Wayne Blilie for a Waiver of Plat in Order to Relocate the Center Lot Line between Lots 19-20, Block 2, Ches Mar East 1st Addition, Section 27. o D. Richard E. Stuke for a Conditional Use Permit for an Indoor Recreational Center and On-Sale 3.2 Beer License Located in Part of the SWkof the NE'k, Section 19 (4030 Beau D'Rue Drive) Q,9 LkE. Michael C. Gresser for a Waiver of Plat in Order to Spilt an Industrial Lot for 2 Building Sites Located on Lot 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park, Section.8 p.10( F. Douglas R. Witt for Variance in Order to Build a Garage within the 30' Setback Requirements Along a Public Street Located on Lot 4, Burrview Acres, 535 Chapel Lane e. 101 G. Richard Winkler for Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to P.D. (Planned Development Consisting of Approximately 91 Acres and for Preliminary Plat of Winkler/Jackson Addition, both located in the NWk of Section 31 VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS P15 A. Revised Personnel Policy Q15'. B. Ordinance No. 36 Revised Q,14Z C. Sign Committee Update /13D. Contract 81-6 for Plans and Specs for the Pilot Knob Center Utilities P_163E. Contract 81-7, Approve Plans & Specifications for Coachman Land Company First Addition Utilities Q l63F. Public Works Department Equipment, Receive Bids, Award Contract for Road Grader IX. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT • 1 -MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR .AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 29, 1981 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION MEMO After approval of the May ; 19, 1981 City Council minutes, special City Council minutes of the May 12, 21 and 27 meetings and of the June 2, 1981 City Council agenda,_ the following items, are in order °for consideration: FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- There are _."no items to be considered for the Fire Department at this time. POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- There are no 'items to be considered for : the Police Department at .this time. ' PARR. DEPARTMENT C. Park Department -- The . Bicycle Trails Plan that was written by the City staff, reviewed in deta L. by the Advisory Park & Recre- ation Committee is ready for consideration by the City Council. The ' City ' Council did: review the plan with the Advisory Park & Recreation Committee, . in a joint meeting held during February. At that meeting, two (2) major policy changes were recommended. The first policy related to funding' and the second policy change related to certain criteria . as it relates to the timely 'and oppor- tunistic development of, the, Eagan, Bicycle Trail System. The remainder of the Bicycle Trails Plan —appeared to be acceptable � to both the City Council and the Advisory •Park& Recreation Commit- tee. For the policy changes, re'fer, ,to pages „ through'3 The Advisory Park ,& Recxe•atloo. Committee` s`recommending approval by the City Council subject ,to';, the; policy . changes. A final draft of the ..Bi.cycle Trails Pian will be prepared once adoption is granted by the City Council. ' All members of the City Council have a copy` of .the Bicycle Trails Plan. If any member has misplaced their plan, please feel, free to contact this office and arrangements will be made to provide a new copy for review. The Bicycle Trails Plan, •like all guide plans, is subject to review and revision 'pperiodically by both, the. Advisory Park & Recreation Committee and City,`Gouneil. z ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: Tom,, consider approval or denial of . the Bicycle 'Trails ' Plan with ,n'.14ithout revisions as ' and ' reco €vended b the .Ad�vis iParks & Recreation Com-. - presentedY mittee. 0.1 ;, 4 The opportunities presented for trail construction depend heavilythe t� incorporation of trails development in conjunction with read improvement Projects. Funding restraints often dictate that trail construction cannot always proceed contetporaneously with road improvement projects. However, road impravenent projects provide an excellent opportunity for the construction of benches for future trail construction and in certain circumstances an opportunity to secure neoes4ary rights-of-way WWor easements. Listed below are the highest priorities for bicycle trail development ir- regardless of the timing of planned road inQroverent projects. Ccnplet- tion of these priority routes would provide the City with a framework of major bicycle trails connecting major destination points throughout the City. Notably, most of the proposed priority routes follow routes pro- posed by the County Trails Plan for trails construction. The County has proposed construction of a trail along one side of each roadway route with the City wholly responsible for trail construction along an additional side of the roadway if desired. The five trail segments listed below are the highest priority for the use of available trail construction funds. TOP FIVE EAGAN TRAIL PRIORITIES ROADMY SER4EM A. Wilderness Run Road (High Line Trail) Capricorn Court to Old Dodd Road B. Pilot Knob Road I-494 to Cliff Road C. Cliff Road Nicols Road to Pilot Knob Road D. Nicols Road Beau D' Rue Drive to Cliff Road Beau D' Rue Drive Nicols Road to Silver Bell Road Silver Bell Read Beau D' Rue Drive to Highway 13 E. Yankee Doodle Road Highway 13 to Pilot Knob Road Z MINOR CITY COLLE=RS Current Policy: 5-foot concrete sidewalk on one side of the roadway. Proposed Policy: 8-foot bituminous trail on one side of the roadway RESIDENTIAL STREET Current Policy: No trails or sidewalks required. Proposed Policy: Same as current policy. 16. Insure timely and opportunistic development of the Eagan Bicycle Trail System by: - reviewing and updating the Bicycle Trails Plan annually and es- tablishing additional five-year trail priorities every five years. - establishing a trails development fund to be used to finance future trails oonstructicn. - constructing bikeways in accordance with the five-year pric)Yi program of the Eagan Bicycle Trails Plan, using establisher' criteria to deterrnine priorities for construction. - providing a bench for future bikeway construction as part of the road construction project in the event funds for the construction of bikeways are unavailable at the time of road ocnstruction. - acquiring sufficient rights-of-way and easements necessary for Class 1 bikeway construction along routes proposed in the Eagan Bicycle Trails Plan when acquisition opportunities present there.- selves during the platting of land or during the development of road rights-of-way. 3 Page forty-nine , Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 Page Two WIl There are : twelve (12) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one 4) motion by ' the City Council. If thereis any item which the 'City. Council would like to discuss in further detail, that item should be removed from the Consent Item list and placed under AdditionalItemsunless the discussion required is brief. This will allow the 'Mayor to proceed with Public Hearings ;as legally noticed at 7:00 p.m. CONT AM. 79--13 FOR FINAL PAYMENT - : A. Contract 79-13, Project 241 for Final Payment/Acceptance (Dodd Road Area Utilities) -»�- The City, has received a request for final payment for the above re€erenced' pro ect from, the consulting engineering firm along with. the certi.�ficaton ,that plans and speci- fications were adhered to All, final inspections have been per- formed and the project is now- ready for final acceptance by the City. The total contract amount provided in the final pay request is consistent with those '.figures used in the final assessment hearing held on October'' ,6, 1.980 , ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER , ' To approve the eighth and final pay request for Contract79=13 in the, amount of $3,59$ to Encon Utilities, Inc. , and accept for perpetual maintenance. CHANGE,QRDER, #1, COPY ACT 80-26 B. Change Order #1 for Contract 80-26 (Safari Estates Streets) =- Due to the inability of the developer to complete the site grading,' it was not possible to complete this street construction during the 1980 season. Because of the delay into 1981, an increase in bituminous oil material has occurred. The increase has been discussed with the developer with an ;9 tion of cancelling the con- t . tract` and readvertising or accepting the cost increase justified by the contractor. The developer does, not object to this change h order. s ACTION TO BE `CONSIDERED ON THE MATTRs To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 8026 (Safari Estates` Streets) in the amount of $6,156. CHANGE-ORDER #1� E2NTRACT=80-31 C. Change, "Order #1 ,far Contract 80-30 (Univac Tower . Painting} ' During the bid solicitation €or .'th3 s � project, an alternate was 7 . 'provided for the 'interior painting .qf. ' the . flue •supportcylinderAll of the Univac water "reservoir. At the time of , considering the ;gin r: bids, it -was suggested that this al ernatg ber deleted from consi `. deration as not bei necessary ':;fit r this`" .tune: However, upon k k 3 Uc�s ..,a,s #n .4,a-.�"_tea w.r "'s=a,f�..ris ..% '�...x.�+���S: �i >r _._. .?,v..s. t.;�k��ztf�'.i �-satui,,a.«..«.wr-are�. r n•�wy1' l Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 Page Three proceeding with the remainder painting of the tower, close observa- tion has indicated that the interior surface of this support cylinder is ' in need of repainting.' Therefore; it is recommended that a change order be approved to provide for this interior painting at the or ginal ,alternate bid price. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 80-31 (Univac' Tower Repainting) in the amount of ,$6 ,000. ' COUNTY-,CONTRACT 31-05 D. County Contract 31-05, City Trailway ' Construction Resolution -- The eight foot -bituminous trailway - to be constructed along the west side of Pilot Knob Road in conjunction with the' County improve- ment contract 31-05 will` berequired to be funded 100% by the City of Eagan. As such, the _City has made application` for and received approval for a grant from the Minnesota Outdoor Recreation Act ` providing for 75% funding for this trailway. In order for the City to receive the funding now that the contract has been let, it is required that the City pass a resolution whereby we can affirm that the remaining 25Ya of the cost for this bikeway will be funded = by the City of Eagan. This remaining 25% will be funded by munici- pal state aid funds. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve the resolution for the Minnesota Outdoor Recreation Act, affirming the City of { Eagan's cost participation, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said resolution, x`51 UTILITY EASEMENT FOR-MnDOT44 E. Transfer UtilityEasement to MnDOT -- With the ending improve- ment of the I-494 nterchange with Pilot Knob Road, the highway department will be acquiring permanent ` right-of-way from adjacent properties for the interchange'. The .City of Eagan has' a 20 foot .. utility easement for the trunk sanitary "'sewer in this area within the anticipated right-of-way acquisition. As such, the .State of Minnesota requires that the City , of Eagan quit claim our interest in the 20' easement the- State of Minnesota. In exchange, the State>`will grant the .City of Eagan a' permanent utility access permit to protect the City's maintenance :a cessibility. This is a techni- cality required by MnDOT's right--of-way. department. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER,' To authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the required quit claim document for the City's, sanitary sewer easement Vithin the , 4-494/Pilot Knob Read interchange. 4.. M A k T *� 1M .t+4*^i,Y --`C4w^4'k..'"' +"e.': .?....✓,n+ S .. ..M ^'.3•Si'.' AhL Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 Page Four j NANCY- OHM. --- CLERK- TYPIST F. Employment of Nancy Ohm as Clerk Typist -- As authorized during the 1981 budget approval, a new clerk typist position was authorized for the Building Inspection Department Beverly Rakauskas who was recently hired to fill the clerk typist vacancy will assume the 'duties of clerk typist` for the Building Inspection Department and Nancy Ohm will then fill the position of clerk typist performing ;duties for assessments and utility billing, a position that has been established for several years. There were approximately 17 applications reviewed and it is recommended that the position be filled by Nancy Ohm. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve the employment of Nancy Ohm -as a clerk typist ` to *work with assessments and utility ' billing. EMPLOYMENT SUMMER RECREATION STAFF G. Employment of Summer Recreation Staff -- The Parks & Recreation Department has conducted approximately" 33 interviews from among 52 applicants for summer part time positions in recreation programs. In addition, there are some 13 individuals who will return from last year's summer recreation program. .Various summer staff are scheduled to work in more than one program of activities Those A individuals who are returning are;. Joan Akins, Loretta Hatfield, Roberta Larson, Kathleen -Fletcher, Jennifer Kvam, Nancy Holford, Kathleen Ryan, Ann LaPointe, Deane Schultz, Melanie Matus, Mary Freedman, Mark Gamelin and Kristi 1 Edlund. New to City *of Eagan recreational programs ,staff are: Dorothy Aho, Carolyn Wolf, Andrew �f Klein, Bambi Wessel, Craig Johnson, ' Nancy Fowler, Brian Lawrence, Lisa Gilsdorf,' Sara Murto, Janet O'Brien, Debbie Applebaumm, Kristin Haugen, Lynda Kompelien, Jean Fredlund and Kristen Lacey. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER. To approve or deny the hiring of the summer recreation program staff for 1981.. �= LEAVE OF. ABSENCE—�--� PENS-MICKLUS H. Leave of Absence for PennyMftkl.us -Police Dispatcher -- Penny Micklus, a police dispatcher, is requesting a leave of absence to attend the . post skills class which an eight week course for training of police officers. She is requesting a leave of 60 days and plans to use vacation to cover - part of that time. She has expressed to our 'Chief of Police that she is willing .to work' as required weekends to help the scheduling in the Police Department. Chief of Police DesLauriers is planningto use dispatchers on their off duty days and a cadet to fill in the various vacancies in scheduling for the absence of Ms. Micklus;*,% - :Penny Micklus has been, a good employee and the leave of {absencfe 'is`��recommended by Chief ' x is I b N # J V77- 1, a 1' Pli x✓ a 'p. rs � f ;agenda "Information Memo; eta ,k .May 29, 1,981 Page Five _ }', of Poli > y Adrnit�istraCo"r can only , ce nesLauriors The Cit grant a. leave o� absence ' . :to thirt ;da s." �4n leeve. of .absence beyond y` . Y y y thirty days requir,`" City' Gounci l acti�an. Thi'' city A�dminis:trattar is recommendin th t leave of absence` � ��nted to- Penn Mick ;us .� z g y. w th the understarniing mat no benfits crfae with the exce.p- E tions "of any 'weekends the "Vdrks ;as a polio c ispatclfer. 4 - ACTION . TO .BE Cowsi6ft,0 MATTER: To approve the .leave of absence £or i'enny Viiia 10-04i as .Stated. + T . CITY �►F : CITY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY , MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO . 2628 RESOLUTION OF NOTICE TO THE CITY OF EAGAN TO TERMINATE AGREEMENT TITLED "JOINT USE AGREEMENT-FIRE DISPATCHER" DATED DECEMBER 15 , 1976 WHEREAS , the cities of Eagan and Inver Grove Heights entered into a Joint Use Agreement for providing fire dispatching services , and WHEREAS , item 11 provides for terminating the agreement , and WHEREAS , the City of Inver Grove Heights desires to terminate the agreement effective December 31 , 1981 . NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That this resolution consti - tutes official notice to the City of Eagan of termination of the Joint Use Agreement-Fire Dispatching dated December 15 , 1976 between the two cities , and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That a copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the City of Eagan as provided in item 12 of the agreement . Adopted by the City Council of Inver Grove Heights this 11 day of Mav 1981 . l Ayes : Newton , Teare , Henderson , Tatone , Saed Nayes : None _;�Howard B . Newton , ayor ATTEST: Ed Kurth , City Clerk Q . O Agenda Information Memo ' May 29, 1981 Page Six TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS J. Trailer Permit Renewals -- There are ten (10) trailer permit renewals to be considered for 1981 . Please refer to_the-\attachment found on page J& Each year, the number of trailer permit renewals is becoming Iower due to change in occupancy or use of a specific trailer, that no longer qualifies for a trailer permit renewal. These trailer permits have been checked by the Building Inspection Department and are found to be in order for consideration at this time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve the trailer ' permit renewals for 1981. F; 1F, W11 ti Y : r S :1 1 A -� � 1981 TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS NAME & ADDRESS NUMBER/EXPLANATION Tripp Oil Co 2 office use 3085 Hwy 13 Eagan MN 55121 Sharon Staff 3 care of mother 1430 Rocky Lane Eagan MN 55123 Earl Marotzke 9 535 Gun Club Rd Rosemount MN 55068 Wilfred Heuer 12 trailer for son 3340 Dodd Rd Eagan MN 55121 G Wm Smith 17 3587 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Robert Mueller 19 871 Wescott Rd Eagan MN 55123 Alwin & Lyle Schulz 20 1315 Carriage Hills Drive Eagan MN 55121 Edmund Schwanz 22 mothers home 810 Yankee Doodle Rd Eagan MN 55123 Levi Heuer 37 Geo Miesters home 1585 Deerwood Dr Eagan MN 55122 Dakota Homes 41 office Doug Isaacson 3660 Dodd Rd Eagan MN 55123 Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 Page Seven SCHOOL- FACILITIES- COMMITTEE K. School Facili"tiesCommittee Appointment - School enrollment in Independent School District 191 is declining The Board of Education for District 191, has approved a policy, and a regulation regarding the 'closing of school facilities. A School 'Facilities Study .Committee was formed by the district with a makeup of eighteen residents, two from each elementary attendance area; five district 'employee representatives and three municipal representatives,one from each of the municipalities of Burnsville, Eagan and Savage. The City Administrator was appointed by the City to represent the City as a municipal official on the School Facilities Study` Commit- tee. The first meeting was June 23; and, due to the nature of the Planning Commission meeting,, 'it was not possible for the City Administrator to attend that meeting. Therefore, the Planning Intern/Assistant was the City's representative that evening. Apparently, the School Facilities Study Committee will meet on Tuesday evenings from June through about November and it is their hope that a recommendation can be made i.n,December of 1981 . Because the meetings are scheduled for Tuesday evenings, it will not be possible for the City Administrator to attend these meetings;- there- fore it will be ,necessary, to ,appoint; someone else to that committee. Mr. Kurt Ulrich who attended the meeting would be happy to act as the City' s representative on that committee and brief the City Administrator regarding all .that transpires_ at the School Facilities Committee meetings. Mr. Ulrich has completed his internship and is working on a temporary basis w th �the City, being compensated at an intern wage scale; and, therefore., : it is uncertain as to how long he will be an employee of the ':City. It is suggested that Mr. Ulrich be appointed. And if he should terminate his position with the City, a new appointment can be, made with the understanding that the City Administrator,, will `maintain a constant awareness as to what ''is transpiring at the " School Facilities- Committee F` meetings. There will be minutes, of each "meeting and those minutes " will be made available for the City Council. There are four (4) . Eagan residents on the School 'Facilities Study Committee and they, are Ed Neppl and Vicki Yam representing the Cedar School area and Jerry' Smith and .Jim Marshall representing` the Rahn School area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To appoint Kurt Ulrich, Planning Intern/Assistant, to serve As., the City' s representative on: a special School Facilities Study Committee in . District 191. y ! - Tg Xl r VWp x o`. A rn r-,a.F a"* ,� �� . Y. r A Agenda Information Memo rt ` May 29, 1981 � r Page Eight; >' LAWCOW-. g%E.,% 1 L LAWCON l ,esal utf o . tii)`Support of � g Several months ago, the ,Citi' Council .appr4 ted a resolut�.#n.. u stti'ng that 1980 AWCON €undo`°b®'-r*Leased anti Wit, the 1981 LAWCON funding leveli. be restored. ` resolution : was addressed to our state government -attd ' ,it .is .Mt�bviot s t tbat the resolution was sit cessful n f �' . fiht: fucl` was, tele� d , x Minnesota cities. Apparently, there '. , i apOculon. in Wasb � �� that , th LAWCON funding for 1982' m*gh� be restored. There ce, . ,resolution requesting . that the, U.S. cxngres°s restore ' r �IGtN, funding would be of a particular `;�idvan, age.;to ��ie Gita` �f �. agate., � Thi? City iha0 received , fund�r�g � f xr he.: a isitian' ; ► n Patk th3 eta a . elUl and i f LAW tIN ening' ' ean` be re-stu' d nrt` vear� there good " possibility ; nthat the ; City could recelundi tMe + evi tpment of that park. Enclflseci on page '�is + .Q a 'resolution that was „:prepared :for considerat .., ACTI+( O .. BE CON, bE �` app a rove a. resolutican .rid, author3: e, the Ci,t�► -�lhrttt �i+ t shd a .Fetter to the United MO. States Con, ressional . a eg is on �� © theaI Mayor and Citi Council regarding the ntituae + f'uu+ ir far . 932 t e 1 t 11 } p 14 IN�a S� r, a Y t 4 Y : 5 ` r �e a ms's"+ . *"" ' 14 ` x �' x p i' �^, F..F"ie �. zw 4 - yS !•k Ste' 1 r ir i t s a aV Y t 5 Wr 'S �y�"1s '; K Air°. xt r� r ' " -� c c K✓, � 3 � :r ' g+�` `'- gad r�•, '�':1a`.p`"g�' . „-,f,.. �''�r` . „* } °5� � z s ... � . RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS TO RESTORE THE 1982 LAWCON FUNDING LEVEL WHEREAS, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, was held on the 2nd day of June, 1981, at 6:30 p.m. at the City Hall, located at 3795 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, Minnesota, all members being present; and, WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has established a five year Park Acquisition and Development Program to meet. Citizens' needs; and WHEREAS, the Five Year Program has been implemented through the joint funding of local, state, and federal funds; and WHEREAS, LAWCON funding has made possible the acquisition of land for preservation, and recreational purposes within the City of Eagan; and WHEREAS, funding has provided the opportunity to develop land to meet leisure needs and satisfy a demand placed on existing facilities; and WHEREAS, the loss of LAWCON funding creates a serious hardship upon the City of Eagan to acquire land and develop existing parks; and WHEREAS, LAWCON funding was allocated from designated sources; and WHEREAS, with inflation and its impact on the cost of land and impact on escalating construction costs; NOW THEREFORE, upon motion by , seconded by , it is RESOLVED that the City of Eagan strongly urges i Congressional support in the continuation of funding LAWCON. Those in favor: Those against: DATED: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN Attest: By: Eugene J. VanOverbeke Beatta Blomquist, Mayor City Clerk Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 Page Nine 090 PROJECT 302- --- O'NEILL POND A. Project 302 for I=-494/0'Neill Pond (FP-1) Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet -- On May 5, 1981, the feasibility report was presented to the City Council with a public hearing scheduled for the June 2 meeting. This public hearing will have to be continued until %the June 16, 1981 meeting due to insufficient- information being supplied to the City by the consulting engineering firm resulting in approximately 50 parcels , being omitted from the public hearing notification process. The City staff is renotifying everyone affected by this project through a new public 'hearing notification. The public informational meeting that was held on Wednesday, May 27 at Pilot Knob Elementary School° will be followed by a second informational meeting scheduled for June 4 beginning at 4:00 p.m. at City Hall for those people who were not aware of the first infor- mational meeting. Continuation of the public hearing must be announced and acted upon at the June 2, 1981 meeting. The report is not included in this City Council packet, however will be pro- vided as agenda information for the June Ib, 1981 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To postpone the public hearing for Project 302_,until the June 16, 1981 City Council meeting. PROJECT 333 B. Project 333 for Pilot Knob Center Streets and Utilities On May 5, 1981,. the feasibility report was presented to the City Council for consideration of the installation of streets and utilities required for the platting of Pilot Knob Center along Duckwood Drive. A copy of that feasibility. report has been made available to the developer and staff has reviewed the details of the report as they pertain to ,the public hearing. A copy of the { is enclosed on, pages report ' a through = - for your review. #�t P , _ 1�. & ACTIONTO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: , :;To ,close the public hearing and either approve or, deny Project . 333.,,.for. the installation of streets and utilities in the Pilot Knob Center Addition. v b } f I k :. u _ .� �k 4 t t }i t r x.�'6's5'�r xa,. -jo-� kk.d. 'Y �� ��� , n to Glenn R. Cook,P.E. p�w�e «tlyL J J • Keith A.Gordon, P.E. Otto G. Boeu•slrao, P.E. Thomas E.Noyes, P.E. p I Robert W. Rosene,P.E. Richard W. Faster, P.E. Joserh C. Anderlik, Y.E. Robert G.Schunicht, P.E. 2335 W. 74—A d{!;yl�.,wq 36 Ifradlord A. Lemberg, P.E. blarvin r..Sorvala,P.E. �J Pp Richard E. Turner, P.F.'. Donald C. Burgardt.P.E. Jl. -4, M---,-a 55113 James C.Olson. P.E. Jerry A.Bourdon,P.E. Afark A.Hanson,P.1:'. Char tia. 612-636-4600 Charter A.Erickson / Let,Al. Puwelsky v�fu( 1956 - t� - 1981 Harlan Al.Olson (( David E. Olson A(r IItIIVCI'Shc'Y_ Preliminary Report on Pilot Knob Center Utility and Street Improvements Project 333 Eagan, Minnesota April 30, 1981 SCOPE: This project provides for the street surfacing of Duckwood Drive from Krestwood Lane to Denmark Avenue. Also included are sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer improvements serving the proposed plat titled "Pilot Knob Center." FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street plans for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out in two contracts. Contract I would include the construction of all of the utilities as outlined herein as well as the aggregate base on Duckwood Drive. Contract II would consist of the con- struction of the concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surface on Duckwood Drive. DISCUSSION: CONTRACT I A. SANITARY SEWER: An existing 8" sanitary sewer is located in the center of Krestwood Lane, approximately 100 feet south of Duckwood Drive. It is pro- posed to construct this sewer to the east right-of-way line of Krestwood Lane, approximately 18 feet east of the existing driving surface. The sewer would Page 1. 3832a /Jr then extend north to the center of proposed Duckwood drive east on Duckwood to the center of proposed Krestwood Lane and north on the centerline of Krestwood to the north edge of Pilot Knob Center. An 8" lateral would be constructed easterly from this line along the south edge of the proposed building in Lot 1, Block 3 for the purpose of serving this building. This sewer would serve Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; 1-4, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3 and future development to the north. In addition to the above described sewer, an 8" main will be constructed in the center of proposed Duckwood Drive, westerly from Denmark Avenue for a distance of approximately 1000 feet. This lateral, along with future laterals to the north, will service Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 3, of Pilot Knob Center. B. WATER MAIN: It is proposed to construct a 24 inch diameter water trunk in Duckwood Drive from the existing 24 inch main in Duckwood at Denmark to the 24 inch trunk in Duckwood at Krestwood Lane. This 24" main is in accordance with the Master Plan for Water Main and completes the construction of this large trunk from Pilot Knob Road to Lexington Avenue. , An 8" water lateral will be constructed in Krestwood Lane from Duckwood Drive to the north edge of Pilot Knob Center. A 6 inch lateral will be con- structed from the 8" main, along the north side of the proposed shopping cen- ter and looping back to Duckwood Drive. This 6" main would be assessed only to Lot 1, Block 3 of Pilot Knob Center. C. SERVICES: Sanitary and water services are to be constructed to each lot platted with Pilot Knob Center. These services will be constructed 20 feet into the lot to avoid disturbing electric and telephone lines when plumbing hookups are made. Lot 3, Block 1 will receive two 8" sewer services and two Page 2. 3832a 8" water services as requested by the developer. Lot 1, Block 2 will receive three 8" wyes and two 8" and one 6" water services. Lot 2, Block 3 will be served from sewer and water laterals to be extended into the lot from Duckwood Drive. The remainder of the lots in Pilot Knob Center are small commercial lots and will be served with 6" inch water and 6 inch sewer stubs. D. STORM SEWER: All of the storm sewer in this project will drain to a pond being constructed near the northwest corner of Duckwood Drive and Denmark Ave- nue. This pond is not shown on the Master Plan, but is a requirement of the development and will be constructed by the developer of Pilot Knob Center. The pond will be constructed in two basins, as is shown on the drawing at the back of this report, but will function as one pond with a large interconnect- ing; pipe. Design criteria for the combined ponds, hereafter known as JP-15A, is as follows: Pond NWL NWL Area HWL HWL Area Storage JP-15A 871.0 0.16 Ac. 880.0 1.02 Ac. 4.1 Ac.Ft. Trunks and laterals will be constructed along the south edge of Pilot Knob Center and in Duckwood Drive to drain this plat. The Developer will construct storm sewers within the parking lot of the shopping center which will drain to those being constructed in this project. E. DUCKWOOD DRIVE (Gravel Base) : Duckwood Drive is a proposed street to be constructed on an 80 foot right-of-way platted with Pilot Knob Center. The developer of Pilot Knob Center will grade this street to a subgrade condition as a part of the site grading of the plat. After installation of utilities, a 6 inch aggregate, base will be constructed on Duckwood Drive. Page 3. 3832a /7 CONTRACT II F. DU_CKWOOD DRIVE (Surfacing) : Street surfacing for Duckwood Drive includes the construction of a 9 ton street, 48 feet wide with B618 concrete curb and gutter. Contract II construction consists of completing the aggregate base and installing the curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing. Also included are topsoil and seed for duckwood Drive. The proposed typical section for Duckwood Drive including Contract I and Contract II is as follows: 2" 2341 Bituminous Wear Course Contract II 2" 2331 Bituminous Base Course Contract II 2" Class 5 Aggregate Base Contract II 6" Class 5 Aggregate Base Contract I The Developer proposes to construct Krestwood Lane north of Duckwood Drive to City Standards under private contract. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Assessment Area Construction Area W 3/41 S 1/2, NW 1/4, Sec. 15 Except W 3/4, S 1/2, NW 1/4, Sec. 15 1st Minnehaha Addition Parcels 010-28 011-29 021-30 022-30 Outlot D, Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addn. Outlot D, Pilot Knob heights Part of Lot 1, Blk. 1 Pk. Hts. 1st 1st Addn. COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented at the back of this re- port. A summary of these costs are as follows: CONTRACT I Sanitary Sewer $ 79,950 Water Main 186,500 Services 21,500 Storm Sewer 194,200 Street (Aggregate Base) 36,810 $518,960 Page 4. 3832a !8 CONTRACT II Street (Surfacing) $136,170 TOTAL CONTRACTS I AND II $655,130 The total estimated cost of the project as outlined herein including con- tingencies and all related overhead is $655,130. Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. EASEMENTS: Easements are required for utility construction in Pilot Knob Cen- ter. These easements are listed as follows: 1. A permanent easement is required to construct the sanitary sewer in the west part of Lot 2, Block 1 near Krestwood Lane. The standard 10' drain- age and utility easement across the front of Lot 2 should .be expanded to 15' to accommodate this construction. 2. A permanent easement is required for the lateral sewer and water stubs in- to Lot 2, Block 3. 3. Permanent easements are required to extend storm sewer stubs into Lots 1 and 2 of Block 3. The storm sewer laterals within Lots 2 and 3 will be constructed and maintained by the Developer and require no easements. 4. A permanent easement will be necessary if the City is to maintain the 6" fire protection line located in the northern and eastern edges of Lot 1, • Block 3. 5. A permanent easement will be required to construct the storm sewer line along the south edge of the plat from the pond near Duckwood Drive to Krestwood Lane. An additional easement will be necessary to bring this storm sewer along the rear lines of Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 to the inter- section of Duckwood Drive and proposed Krestwood Lane. Page 5. 3832a 19 6. A ponding easement will be required for Pond JP-15A encompassing all prop- erty at or below elevation 880.0. The above easements are anticipated to be acquired in conjunction with final approval of the plat. It is assumed that these easements will be ac- quired at no cost to the project. • In addition to the platted easements described above, the following ease- ments must be obtained from other sources and are also expected to be acquired at no cost to the project. 7. A temporary easement will be required along the north edge of Lot 1, Block 1, Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition for the construction of the storm sewer mentioned in paragraph No. 4 above. 8. Outlot "D" of Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition was platted as future right- of-way for Duckwood Drive. The alignment proposed in this report would use only the north edge of Outlot "D" for right-of-way. The portion of Outlot "D" necessary for the right-of-way of Duckwood Drive must be ac- quired before this project can begin. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property as indicated in the preliminary assessment roll included at the back of this report. All or parts of three parcels, which are currently under the same ownership, are located within the Pilot Knob Center plat. The prelimin- ary assessment roll indicates assessed costs for lots within the proposed plat and for Outlot-D of the Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition. Assessment rates for the construction of lateral facilities will be determined by final improvement costs and be assessed to each benefited property. Lateral costs associated with water main construction assume that pipe sizes larger than 8 inches in Page 6. 3832a AQ NOW diameter will be assessed at an 8 inch equivalent rate. Storm sewers larger than 24 inch diameter will be assessed at the proposed 24 inch diameter rate as presented in this report. Trunk sanitary sewer and water main have been previously assessed to the parcels which now comprise Pilot Knob Center under Project #58. Trunk storm sewer has not been assessed and is proposed to be assessed as a part of this project. Base rates in effect at the time of the public hearing for this project for trunk storm sewer are as follows: Trunk Storm Sewer - Single Family $0.0374/sq.ft. - Multi-Family $0.0468/sq.ft. - Commercial-Industrial $0.0561/sq.ft. It is proposed that all costs associated with the construction of Duckwood drive are to-be assessed directly to the benefited property. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed as follows: SANITARY SEWER Project Cost Revenue Trunk Fund Bal. Laterals $ 79,950 Lateral Assessment $79,950 TOTAL $ 79,950 $ 79,950 - 0 - WATER MAIN Lateral $113,120 Lateral Assessment $113,120 Trunk 73,380 TOTAL $186,500 $113,120 -$73,380 SERVICES Lateral $ 21,500 Lateral Assessment $ 21,500 TOTAL $ 21,500 $ 21,500 - 0 - Page 7. 3832a R • J STORM SEWER Project Cost Revenue Trunk Fund Bal. Lateral $136,560 Lateral Assessment $136,560 Trunk 57,640 Trunk Assessment 112,710 TOTAL $194,200 $249,270 +$55,070 STREET Duckwood Dr. (Base) $ 36,810 Duckwood Dr. (Surf.) 136,170 Duckwood Dr. Assmt. $172,980 TOTAL $172,980 $172,980 - 0 - TOTAL PROJECT BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -$18,310 PROJECT SCHEDULE CONTRACT I Project Feasibility Report May 5, 1981 Public Hearing June 2, 1981 Approve Plans and Specifications June 2, 1981 Open Bids June 25, 1981 Award Bids July 7, 1981 Construction Completion September, 1981 Assessment Hearing Nov./Dec. , 1981 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1983 CONTRACT II Approve Plans and Specifications July 7, 1981 Open Bids July 30, 1981 Award Bids August 4, 1981 Construction Completion October 31, 1981 Assessment Hearing April, 1982 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1983 Page 8. 3832a I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer un- der the laws of the State of Minnesota. Keith A. Gordon Date: April 30, 1981 Reg.No. 10204 Approved by:CZz Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Date: 3832a Page 9. 43 APPENDIX A COST ESTIMATE PILOT KNOB CENTER PROJECT 333 CONTRACT I UTILITIES AND GRAVEL BASE A. SANITARY SEWER 2,340 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 10'-12' dp. @ $11.00/lin.ft. $ 25,740 380 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 12'-14' dp. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 4,560 320 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 14'-16' dp. @ $14.00/lin.ft. 4,480 130 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 16'-18' dp. @ $16.00/lin,ft. 2,080 13 Each Std, 8' dp. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 11,700 50 Lin.ft. MH Depth over 8' @ $80.00/lin.ft. 4,000 12 Each Wye branch @ $50.00/each 600 10 Lin.ft. MH drop inlet @ $60.00/lin.ft. 600 300 Tons Trench stabilization rock @ $10.00/ton 3,000 3 Each Connect to existing MH @ $200.00/each 600 1 Each Repair Krestwood Lane @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 2,550 Lin.ft. Trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,550 Total Estimated Construction $ 60,910 +5% Contingency 3,050 $ 63,960 +25% Legal, Engrng. , Admin. & Bond Interest 15,990 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER . $ 79,950 B. WATER MAIN 1,800 Lin.ft. 24" DIP Water main @ $35.00/lin.ft. $ 63,000 800 Lin.ft. 8" DIP Water main @ $14.00/lin.ft. 11,200 2,200 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main @ $12.00/lin.ft. 26,400 11 Each Hydrant with valve @ $1,000.00/each 11,000 2 Each 24" Butterfly valve & box @ $2,500.00/ea. 5,000 2 Each 8" Gate valve & box @ $450,00/each 900 4 Each 6" Gate valve & box @ $350.00/each 1,400 17,000 Lbs. Fittings @ $1.00/lb. 17,000 A-1 3832a B. WATER MAIN, Contd. 2 Each Cut into existing plug @ $200.00/each $ 400 100 Tons Trench stabilization rock @ $10.00/ton 1,000 4,800 Lin.ft. Trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 41800 Total Estimated Construction $142,100 +5% Contingency 7,100 $149,200 +25% Legal, Engrng. , Admin. & Bond Interest 37,300 TOTALWATER MAIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . $186,500 C. SERVICES 120 Lin.ft. 8" VCP Sewer Service @ $10.00/lin.ft. $ 1,200 320 Lin.ft. 6" CISP Sewer Service @ $6.00/lin.ft. 1,920 180. Lin.ft. 8" DIP Water Service @ $14.00/lin.ft. 2,520 220 Lin.ft. 6" D.I.P. Water Service @ $12.00/lin.ft. 2,640 4 Each 8" Gate valve & box @ $450.00/each 1,800 8 Each 1-1/2" Corporation stop @ $40.00/each 2,800 3,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.00/lb. 3,000 500 Lin.ft. Trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 500 Total Estimated Construction $ 16,380 +5% Contingencies 820 $ 17,200 +25X Legal, gngrng. , Admin. & Bond Interest 43,300 TOTALSERVICES . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 21,500 D. STORM SEWER 600 Lin.ft. 48" RCP Storm Sewer @ $60.00/1in.ft. $ 36,000 750 Lin.ft. 42" RCP Storm Sewer @ $50.00/lin.ft. 37,500 300 Lin.ft. 30" RCP Storm Sewer @ $30.00/lin.ft. 9,000 260 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm Sewer @ $28.00/lin.ft. 7,280 620 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm Sewer @ $25.00/lin.ft. 15,500 420 Lin.ft. 21" RCP Storm Sewer @ $24.00/lin.ft. 10,080 A-2 3832a -q-5, D. STORM SEWER, Cont'd. 200 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm Sewer @ $22.00/lin.ft. 4,400 50 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm Sewer @ $20.00/lin.ft. 1,000 4 Each 6' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,500.00/each 6,000 3 Each 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 2,700 1 Each 6' dia. CBMH w/cstg. @ $1,500.00/each 1,500 5 Each 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 4,500 1 Each Type 2 CB w/cstg. @ $700.00/each 700 2 Each Dbl. CB w/cstgs. @ $1,500.00/each 3,000 1 Each 48" Apron w/trash guard @ $2,000.00/each 2,000 1 Each 42" Apron w/trash guard @ $1,600.00/each 1,600 3,200 Lin.ft. Trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 3,200 200 Tons Trench stabilization rock in pl. @ $10.00/lin.ft. 2,000 Total Estimated Construction $147,960 +5% Contingencies 7,400 $155,360 +25% Legal, Engrng. , Admin. & Bond Interest 38,840 TOTALSTORM SEWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . $194,200 E. STREET (A gregate Base) 500 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $4.00/cu.yd. $ 2,000 10,100 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $0.50/sq.yd. 5,050 3,500 Tons Class 5 aggregate base @ $6.00/ton 21,000 Total Estimated Construction $ 28,050 +5X Contingency 1,400 $ 29,450 +25% Legal, Engrng. , Admin. & Bond Interest 7,360 TOTALAGGREGATE BASE . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . $ 36,810 CONTRACT I UTILITIES AND GRAVEL BASE A. SANITARY SEWER $ 68,430 B. WATER MAIN 186,500 C. SERVICES 13,490 D. STORM SEWER 194,200 E. STREET (Aggregate Base) 36 810 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT CONTRACT I . . . . . . . $499,430 A-3 3832a fo CONTRACT II STREET SURFACING F. STREET SURFACING 8,700 Sq.yds. Base preparation @ $0.50/sq.yd. $ 4,350 1,200 Tons Class 5 Aggregate Base @ $6.00/ton 7,200 2,000 Tons Bituminous mixture @ $15.00/ton 30,000 100 Tons Bituminous material for mixture @ $210.00/ton 21,000 3,900 Lin.ft. B618 Concrete curb & gutter @ $6.00/lin.ft. 23,400 9,500 Sq.ft. Concrete sidewalk @ $1.40/sq.ft. 13,300 12 Each Adjust MH or CB @ $200.00/each 2,400 4 Each Adjust G.V. Box @ $150.00/each 600 1.5 Acres Seed w/mulch @ $1,000.00/Ac. 1,500 Total Estimated Construction $103,750 +5% Contingency 5,190 $108,940 +25% Legal, Engrng. , Admin. & Bond Interest 27,230 TOTAL STREET SURFACING $136,170 A-4 3812a .97 APPENDIX B PROJECTED ASSESSMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROJECT 333 PILOT KNOB CENTER Parcels included within Pilot Knob Center Plat Owner Parcels 010-28 Kenneth Appelbaum 011-29 Kenneth Appelbaum 021-30 Pilot Knob Associates Sanitary Sewer Lateral Assessment F.F. Rate/F.F. Total Lot 1, Block 1 175.56 $13.42 $ 2,356 Lot 2, Block 1 224.61 13.42 3,015 Lot 3, Block 1 817.69 13.42 10,975 Lot 4, Block 1 282.09 13.42 3,786 Lot 1, Block 2 314.40 13.42 4,220 Lot 2, Block 2 178.97 13.42 2,402 Lot 3, Block 2 180.00 13.42 2,416 Lot 4, Block 2 345.00 13.42 4,631 Lot 1, Block 3 1,446.10 13.42 19,410 Lot 1, Block 3 (Interior Line) 11,520 Lot 2, Block 3 782.20 13.42 10,499 Lot 2, Block 3 (stub) 4,720 4,746.62 $79,950 Water Lateral Assessment F.F. Rate/F.F. Total Lot 1, Block 1 175.56 $16.01 $ 2,811 Lot 2, Block 1 224.61 16.01 3,597 Lot 3, Block 1 817.69 16.01 13,094 Lot 4, Block 1 282.09 16.01 4,517 Lot 1, Block 2 314.40 16.01 5,035 Lot 2, Block 2 178.97 16.01 2,866 B-1 3832a Lot 3, Block 2 180.00 16.01 2,882 Lot 4, Block 2 345.00 16.01 5,525 Lot 1, Block 3 1,446.10 16.01 23,157 Lot 1, Block 3 (Fire Protection Line) 33,070 Lot 2, Block 3 782.20 12,526 Lot 2, Block 3 (stub) 4,040 4,746.62 $113,120 Services Lateral Assessment Sewer Size Water Size Cost Lot 1, Block 1 6" 6" $ 1,570 Lot 2, Block 1 6" 6" 1,570 Lot 3, Block 1 8"(2) 8"(2) 6,630 Lot 4, Block 1 6" 6" 1,570 Lot 1, Block 2 6" 6" 1,570 Lot 2, Block 2 6" 6" 1,570 Lot 3, Block 2 6" 6" 1,570 Lot 4, Block 2 6" 6" 1,570 Lot 1, Block 3 8"(3) 8"(3) 31880 $ 21,500 Storm Sewer Lateral Assessment S4.ft. Rate/Sq.ft. Total Lot 1, Block 1 48,741 $.0810 $ 3,946 Lot 2, Block 1 64,872 .0810 5,252 Lot 3, Block 1 356,074 .0810 28,825 Lot 4, Block l 30,038 .0810 2,432 Lot 1, Block 2 81,429 .0810 6,592 Lot 2, Block 2 72,487 .0810 5,868 Lot 3, Block 2 56,849 .081Q 4,602 Lot 4, Block 2 49,570 .0810 4,013 Lot 1, Block 3 604,666 .0810 48,948 Lot 2, Block 3 322,201 .0810 26,082 1,686,927 $136,560 B-2 3832a ,79 . s � Storm Sewer Trunk Assessment Sq.ft. Rate/Sq.ft. Total Lot 1, Block 1 48,741 $.0561 $ 2,734 Lot 2, Block 1 64,872 .0561 3,639 Lot 3, Block 1 356,074 .0561 19,976 Lot 4, Block 1 30,038 .0561 1,685 Lot 1, Block 2 81,429 .0561 4,568 Lot 2, Block 2 72,487 .0561 4,067 Lot 3, Block 2 56,849 .0561 3,189 Lot 4, Block 2 49,570 .0561 2,781 Lot 1, Block 3 604,666 .0561 33,922 Lot 2, Block 3 644,402 .0561 36,151 2,009,128 $112,712 Street Assessment F.F. Rate/F.F. Total Lot 2, Block 1 224.61 $51,601 $ 11,590 Lot 3, Block 1 817.69 51.60 42,193 Lot 4, Block 1 282.09 51.60 14,556 Lot 1, Block 2 218,57 51.60 11,278 Lot 1, Block 3 818.01 51.60 42,209 Lot 2, Block 3 782.20 51.60 40,362 Outlot D, Pilot Knob Hts. 1st. 209.14 51.60 10,792 3,352.31 $172,980 B-3 3832a NEW ad YANI(Eik . �j .� . • • 1 ` • g-'W �♦ lam � � ■■ r� •� 111► NMI ..., o 0-10 v •� � r--y rte■. �.:.:• `�� PFCITY Za �EASOTJ �♦ �� �r �•���� PILOT KNOB CENTERSTORM SEWER TRUNK, YANKEL .� ]Co. R'l IN Imp N NO\ !its il► r• ,%Ogle . ,` O age :N -��I ��.�.�-•tel ; � NCITY ���� e.. •�i . Ti • PILOT KNOB CENTER STORM SEWER LATERAL ASSESSMENTS PROJECT r , ... � , I i I I N ■ V _ _ 1 I 1 3nN3AV )IaVWN30 N avob 38n.L i �� m � o Cb QL V C V g W W cM W o 3NVIa 0 >4 awl Z C4 V M �+ __ ___4•-- rte, (�Il N - appM jS3MON h_I PMZ b Q N Z o �oo -C� a OVON 80N)I. 1011d j �I N N s I � 04 t I l� 3nN3AV A8MN30 N 38nini — € 3 0 ` E � g s O o Q 4 ' C v M EW4 ch h z Z M U � • N '1 O W H � Z rV� N _ 000MLLS30 d Ey p �oI C a avow " 10n id i N sM a U N 3nN3AV ANVWN3a r�j1 til p avob 3aruni , 0 0 4 c V 0 o W M 3NV'l 00OM OWN 3NV z H N - 000NLLS38 0 d H Q 410 a a IE 'ON 'H'V S'D OVOa BONA 10-IId i I � h N � sM 3nN3AV NaV 3a F Y x m S2 w I D - xz p Q J .- a y aiin.in i _ �� cn - - - - -- - - - --�\ a ar z Lj X. a ® W W U u) cn acn 4 ' C V _ M C o O h O F M z M � w c V 0 E--4 z pq V� 3NDOOM S32i)l N0 V 3NVI C'♦z x v O E4 p �� p P a � a OVO» BONS 1011d 4 00- Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 Page Ten =00 It 41111 NOW WAIVER OF PLAT`--. JE1EY R' ,BLOOM �L A. Jeffrey R. Bloom for a Waiver of Plat in Order to Split Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition .-- A public hearing was first con- sidered 'at the APC meeting of March 24, 1981 to consider an .applica- tion by ' Jeffrey R. Bloom fora waiver of plat to divide Lot 10, .Block 3, Clearview Addition, into two (2) single family lots. The item was continued'- until the April 28,,_ 1981 SPC meeting due to a conflict of the J 'applicant to appear at that meeting. This item has been. 'placed on the City Council agendas of May 5 and 19, r 1981 and continued both times; due to lack of attendance of the applicant at the meeting:. A letter was sent to the applicant stating that the item will be considered at the June 2, 1981 meeting 1: unless, the City Administrator is- contacted otherwise by the appli- cant. The APC is recommending approval of the 'waiver of plat to the City Council. For :additional information on the matter, please refer to the Planning Intern'S. 'report' which was enclosed in the May 5, 1981 City Council packet and referred to as pages 41 through 45. For a ' copy of the Alt action on this ;item, refer to page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC to approve the waiver of plat for Jeffrey R. Bloom as described. i! j t r�3ad - } •: i� fid' k rx",`� i+r. + ,zy d j . `�* sa .. .. JEFFREY R. BLOOM -- CLEARVIEW ADDITION WAJLV OF PLAT The first hearing convened by Chairman Harrison concerned the application of Jeffrey R. Bloom for waiver of plat in order to divide Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition into two single family lots. Mr. and Mrs. Bloom were present and there were no objections. The Blooms indicated that they had no objections to the additional assessment proposed by the City. Gits moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application subject to the following conditions: 1. A single access shall be provided off of Cliff Road to serve both lots. 2. All necessary utility easements shall be provided. 3. The newly-created lots shall meet all City ordinance requirements. 4. Approval shall be obtained from Dakota County before access is gained to Cliff Road. 5. A cash park contribution shall be provided on the newly-created lots. 6. Additional sewer and water service must be provided to the west half of Lot 10. r 7• All assessments providing benefit to this lot for streets and utili- ties shall be agreed to and/or paid. 8. In addition to the 5/10 foot drainage and utility easements adjacent to property lines, a drainage and ponding easement shall be dedicated across the north portion of Lot 10 to incorporate the 928.0 elevation contour. 9. Sufficient right-of-way shall be dedicated to provide for a 75-foot half right-of-way along Cliff Road (County Road 32). All members voted in favor. 3a C Agenda Information Memo` May 29, 1981 Page Eleven ZECO COMPANY FOR CONDITIONAL. IYSE PERMIT B. Zeco Company for a Conditional Use . Permit to. Allow _ outside Storage in an I-1 Classification A public hearing was held by the APC at a regular meeting held on April 28, 1981 to consider an application pubmitted' by Zeco Company requesting a conditional use permit to allow outside storage located at the Globemaster Building, This building is located at 3850 Nicols Road (Old Cedar :Avenue) The APC is recommending approval of the conditional use permit as _ presented to the City Council. At the May 19, 1981 City Council meeting, this item was considered.- " There were a number of questions regarding the outside storage as it relates to sight visibility from the Cedar Avenue Freeway. The Zeco Company is working on a different rearrangement ..of the outside storage, plans for additional controls for aesthetic reasons and will provide pictures as a visual aid as to- how -the .site will be observed from the Cedar " Avenue Freeway This .information is to be available on Monday as supplement 'information, for ' the Council packet. For additional information, please refer- to the City Planner' s report, {: a copy of which was enclosed on pages. 21 through 29 of the May 19, 1981 agenda packet. For, additional information regarding the action that was taken by the APC, please ,refer to those minutes, �- a copy of which is enclosed on pages'_ through, ^. ACTION' TO_ BE CONSIDERED 'ON THE MATTER: To either approve 'or deny the conditional use permit for Zeco Company as described. Ap a d1£ 5; x a a` t ;!k' 4 a.. .. � .x t .. if rF, x6ak ..._�S - - ...__.. .xen,,. ZECO COMPANY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTSIDESTORAGE The public hearing regarding the application of Zeco Company for condi- tional use permit for outside storage at the Globemaster Building, 3815 Cedar Avenue, was next convened. William Benjamin, of Zeco, and other representa- tives were present. He indicated the proposal was to have outside storage both on the east and west sides of the building on a crushed rock surface. Zeco would be renting the entire building and only a portion of the land and further, it was noted that the equipment would be higher than six feet with the tallest equipment nine feet eleven inches. He further stated that a maximum of 10 feet height limit is requested with a maximum of 10 pieces of equipment stored outside at any one time. Mr. Benjamin indicated that there was no plan for a pylon sign on the location. There were concerns about berming and it was suggested that the berming be outside of the fencing to hide the fencing. Two neighboring owners were present and had objections to the debris that had blown around the area and the future maintenance of the exterior of the buiding. There was also concern about the on-site septic system and it was noted that the Building Inspector had inspected and indi- cated there were no problems in that respect. Mr. Benjamin further indicated that there would be some servicing but no engine repair or painting on the site. The Chairman was concerned about the septic system, that no landscape plan had been submitted, and also uncertainty about cleanup of the area. Krob moved, Harrison seconded a motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit under the following conditions: 1. That the septic tank and drain field will be inspected and approved by the Building Inspector prior to approval of the conditional use permit. 2. That the parking area shall be striped to provide at least 35 parking spaces for the facility. 3. The proposed storage area shall have crushed rock surface and dust control substances shall be periodically applied to keep dust under control in this storage area. 4. Storage shall not exceed six feet except for a maximum of 11 pieces of equipment that are not in excess of 10 feet in height in the storage area. 5. Outside storage shall only be allowed in the area where outside storage is designated. 6. Building permits shall be obtained, and the buiding code shall be met in areas where the building will be altered. f O F 0 e 7• The conditional use permit shall be reviewed on a 3 year basis to determine whether all conditions are being met. 8. A landscape bond in an amount to be determined by the City Council shall be provided to guarantee that the landscaping which is proposed is completed. This landscape bond shall be released one year after the land- scaping has been completed and the landscape plan shall be submitted prior to approval. 9. The entire property shall be cleared of all debris prior to the final approval of the conditional use permit including any debris that is found in general area. All members voted in favor. a , , Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 01 Page Twelve U.S HOMES CORPORATION -- LEXINGTON ADDITION ` C. U. S Homes Corporation for Rezoning from R-4 to R-3, Consisting of Approximately 59 Acres, and for Preliminary Plat Approval of Lexington Addition Consisting of Approximately 82 Acres -- A public hearing was held by the APC at the April 28, 1981 meeting to con- sider two. applications submitted by U. S. Homes Corporation. The first 'application was a request to rezone approximately 59.03 acres :from R-4 to R-3. The second application is a request for preli- minary plat approval of Lexington Addition which consists of approximately 62 acres and will contain 260 condominium units and 25 acres of R-4 zoning. The Advisory Planning Commission is <recom- mendingg approval of the rezoning and preliminary plat to the City Council. At the May ' 19, 1981. City Council meeting, there were a number of concerns addressed by the City Council relative to both the rezpning request and the preliminary plat. -' At the, direction of the City Council, a memorandum was prepared by the City Administrator and submitted to the Advisory Planning Commission reviewing the seven (7) considerations that were discussed by the City k"Council. U. S Homes. Carporation has been working on the . rezoning and preliminary plat .per the suggestions made ,by the City Council and it is anticipated" a copy of all the revision will be received on Monday, June 1, 1981, for distribution as supplemental information for City Council review. For a copy of the memo that was sent to the Advisory Planning Commission, please refer to page For additional information as it relates to Lexington Addi- ion, ;please refer to pages 40 through ,49 of the May 19, 1981 City Council packet. For action that was .taken b the APC, refer , to those !minutes found on pages !V7 through •' ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the rezoning and preliminary plat for Lexington Addition as stated above. r :F. 11 � x LXXI11GTON PLACE REZONING AND PRELDC[NARZ PLAT — 0.3. HMS The next hearing convened by the Chairman concerned the application of U.S. Homes and Orrin Thompson Homes to rezone approximately 59.03 acres from R-4, Residthtial Multiple, to R-3, Residential Townhouse and for preliminary plat approval of Lexington Place consisting of approximately 84.62 acres containing 260 condominium units and 25 acres of R-4 zoning. Mr. Charles Linden, Mr. Orrin Thompson and Mr. Bob Carlson appeared for the applicant. Member Wilkins stated her concerns about the revision of zoning from Agricul- tural to R-4 and whether any conditions had been imposed upon the rezoning in 1969. Copies of the minutes indicated that there did not appear to be any conditions imposed at that time. She also questioned whether the staff had completed its study regarding the condominium type housing which had been requested by the City Council at the time of installation of the approval of the proposal in Ridgecliffe Addition, and further expressed her concern re- garding the construction of multiple family adjacent to existing R-1 along Wescott Road. Member Wilkins moved to continue the application until the next regular meeting until these answers have been submitted to the Commission. Harrison seconded the motion. Those in favor of the motion were Harrison and Wilkins. Those against were Bohn, Krob, Gits and Turnham. Mr. Winden explained the proposal in detail and stated that 196 units would be provided in the central area with 64 units in the balance with 260 condominium units proposed. Net density would be 5.3 units per acre with the gross density of 4.4 units per acre. There was considerable discussion con- cerning spacing and the driveways for parking and in addition, street main- tenance. No specific plans have been developed for the R-4 area. The devel- oper will dedicate several ponds to the City as requested and the proposal is for 17 acres of open space in the quadraminium area exclusive of streets. Substantial setbacks from Lexington Avenue are provided and Outlot F includes 3.6 acres of open space and 2.8 acres on Outlot A for open space. Some members expressed their concerns about developing R-4 to the north and at the south after the R-3 has been developed which may create objections by owners. Mr. Thompson stated that buyers of the condominium parcels are given full dis- closure of the proposed future multiple construction. Member Wilkins also expressed her concern about the large number of driveways to Duckwood Drive. The developer indicated that it is expected that the children in the one to three-bedroom condominium units will approximate .18 per unit which exists in Ridgeeliffe Addition. The development work is planned during 1981. Gits moved, Bohne seconded a motion to recommend rezoning from R-4 to R-3 as requested. It was noted that the Planning Commission had approved the re- zoning on March 25, 1969 and the Town Board on April 15, 1969. All voted in favor. Gits then moved, Bohne seconded a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The preliminary plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission and subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's recommendations and comments. 2. A trail shall be constructed from Duckwood Drive to the southern border of the plat. This trail shall be constructed by the developer at its cost. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan which shall be approved by the City, and a landscape bond which is adequate to cover the landscape requirement. 44 3. If a model home site is to be provided within the plat, the model home site shall be designated at this time. 4. The applicant shall be required to submit plans for tot lots in each of the two areas designated. This plan shall be approved by the Eagan Park Director. 5. The applicant shall be required to submit by-laws for the homeowner's association so that the City can review these by-laws prior to the approval of the final plat. 6. The developer shall submit detailed plans for the condominium apart- ment complex for City approval prior to the construction of any of the R-4 sites. 7. The developer shall install fire hydrants at the entrances to the private streets which have a 30 foot rights-of-way. 8. All other applicable ordinances shall be met. 9. Sufficient right-of-way shall be dedicated to provide for a 55' half right-of-way along Lexington Avenue. 10. The construction of a 44 foot 9-ton collector street for the exten- sion of Duckwood Drive with a 5' concrete sidewalk on the north side will be the total responsibility of this development. 11. All related trunk area and lateral benefits from trunk assessments must be paid and/or levied at the time of final plat approval if not covered under an approved project by the City of Eagan. 12. Sufficient drainage/ponding easements shall be dedicated for the following ponds with required elevations: DP-18, 880.0; JP-45, 897.0; JP-46, 894.0. It was noted that it was proposed to construct condomiuniums in the R-4 area with a maximum of three stories including one and two bedroom units from 70.0 to 1,000 square feet per unit. All voted in favor except Wilkins who voted luding one and two bedroom units from 700 to 1,000 square feet per unit. All voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no because she stated the City Council has not been submitted a study from staff to evaluate the R-3 condominium type development being proposed. 45' F Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 Page Thirteen CINNAMON RIDGE A. Zachman Homes, Inc. , for Rezoning from R-2 to R-4 to PD and for Preliminary Plat of Cinnamon Ridge consisting of approximately 72 acres -- A public hearing was first held by the APC at the Febru- ary 24, 1981 meeting and then again at the March 24, 1981 meeting. : The City Council considered the recommendation of the APC at their April 7, 1981 City Council meeting; and due to various concerns regarding the proposed commercial zoning and density configurations of the proposed residential uses , the developer was asked to revise his applications and represent them to the Advisory Planning Com- mission. The Advisory Planning Commission held a new public hearing and considered the revised rezoning and preliminary plat for Cin- namon Ridge at the May 26, 1981 APC meeting. The APC is recom- mending approval of the revised rezoning and preliminary plat as presented by Zachman Homes, Inc. The two applications under con- sideration by the City are: 1 . A request to rezone approximately 72 acres from R-2 and R-4 to PD; and 2. A request for a preliminary plat of Cinnamon Ridge Addition consisting of ten single family lots , 16 twin home lots , 14 cluster homes , 9 eight plex units and two outlots for a total of 124 dwelling units in the first phase of development. For additional information on the matter, refer to the City Plan- ner' s report, a copy of which is found on pages through �'S� . For a letter that was received by the Advis' bey Planning oC mmission by Pena, refer to page For a correction to the traffic volumes calculated for the proposed preliminary plat of Cinnamon Ridge , refer to page 6 -7 for a memorandum prepared by the Director of Public Works . nE closed, but not given a page num- ber, in each City Council packet file is a larger scale drawing of the preliminary plat for Cinnamon Ridge and also a phasing plan for the Cinnamon Ridge development. Mayor Blomquist has expressed concerns regarding the various calculations as prepared by the City Planner and those calculations will be reviewed in detail by the Planning Department with a memorandum of correction or sub- stantiation being provided as supplement information with the administrative packet on Monday. If there is anv additional infor- mation required, such as any of the old reports , please feel free to contact this office and that information will be made available to the City Council members . The Advisory Park & Recreation Com- mittee is in concurrance with the number; of acres and fact that park land dedication is necessary for the Cinnemon Ridge development as �rcposed. If the Zachman p-opoca� for Cinnamon Ridge should Agenda Information Memo May 29 , 1981 Page Fourteen be approved by the City Council , a condition should be attached that the Advisory Park & Recreation Committee study and recommend to the City Council at a later date whether the park land should be dedicated to the City and, therefore, developed and maintained by the City, or if the park land should be owned, developed and maintained by the various cooperative associations . A copy of the APC action regarding this item is enclosed on page (p%-'71 . .: ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the ' recommendation of the APC to approve the rezoning from R-2 and R-4 to PD and for preliminary plat of Cinnamon Ridge . CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNp1vIpN RIDGE APPLICANT: ZACHMAN HOMES INC LOCATION: SDS; OF THE SI4 OF SECTION 31 EXISTING ZONING: R-2 (RESIDENTIAL DOUBLE DISTRICT) XM R-4(RESIDENTIAL DISTRI DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAYT26,E1981CT) DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21, 1981 REPORTED BY: DALE C R ZUZE CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 72 acres from R-2 (Residential Double District) and R-4 (Residential Multiple District) to PD (Planned Development District) . The second application submitted is a request for arelimina Ridge Addition, which will consist of 10 single family lots, 16 tt-wi .nplat�hcme lCinnots, 14 cluster hares, 9__8-plea units and 2 cutlots for a total of 124 dwelling units in the first phase-of development. LAND USE Presently the parcel is split in half and approximately 36 acres are presently zoned R-2 (Residential Double District) and 36 acres of R-4- (Residential Multi- ple Distri ) . The proposed zoning would allow duplex develognent and multiple Y development. The land use guide plan indicates R-2 land use, which is mixed residential of 3-6 dwelling units per acre and R-4, Residential Multiple of 12 units + per ate, Therefore, the proposed planned develop ment is in accor- dance with the Eagan Congre.hensive Guide Plan. cctza s As you are aware, this plat has been before the Advisory Planning Ccamussion and City Council. There have been many concerns raised about the original plan- ned develcFxnent,and the City Council directed staff to re-evaluate the overall Planned development. There was a directiveiven re g by the Eagan City Council to look at a number of issues in preparing the new overall plan. Steve Ryan from Zachman Homes has analyzed each of the concerns that the City Council had and has provided a memorandum addressing each of these concerns as it relates to the new planned development. City staff has also researched the b o items the City66uracil addressed in re- gard to street connections into the City of Burnsv Ue. The two streets involved were Perrot Lane and Kentwood Court. The City Attorney has prepared a memorandum i in regard to the Possibility of opening the ,two streets mentioned above. The 47 a CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON RIDGE MAY 26, 1981 PAGE INIO City of Burnsville at a special City Council meeting held on April 11, 1981, re- stated their position regarding the vacation of these two streets, Perrot Lane and Kentwood Court. The resolution reconfirms the vacation of these two streets which was officially done in 1969. Therefore, it appears that the City of Burns- ville will not cooperate in tieing this subdivision into the City of Burnsville to provide continuity. The City staff has also contacted the Metropolitan Council to see if the Metro- politan Council would enter in in resolving this problem. The Metropolitan Council has stated that the two streets in question are of local interest and do not relate to any Metropolitan systems. Therefore, the Metropolitan Council would not get involved on vacating the two streets mentioned above. It appears that upon vacating Perrot Lane and Kentwood Court would take legal action which the City of Eagan would have to initiate in order to reopen these streets. City staff has also met with Dakota County in regard to the Cinnamon Ridge Addi- tion and the Winkler/Jackson Addition to discuss the traffic generations frau each development and how they relate to Cliff Road. The city engineer will be addressing this item. Another concern which was raised at the public hearing was in regard to parkland within this neighborhood. In the revised plan, the developer has proposed two locations for parkland. The first being a 2� acre parcel which could be used for an active play area within this develop rent. The second is a parcel which will be combined into an overall drainage area and open space which would be approxi- mately 6 acres in size and could also be used for additional recreational space. Staff would like to mention that the two parks which are being provided within this development do not meet the normal standards for providing parkland in the City of Eagan. In the cmprehensive planning process, staff has looked at neighborhoods consisting of approximately 1 square mile and one neighborhood park of approximately 10-15 acres in size to be provided for each neighborhood. Therefore, the parks proposed in this develogmnt are below the minimum standards for a neighborhood park within the City of Eagan. Since this is a unique situa- tion that the parcel is quite small, the City has taken exception to the neigh- borhood park standards to provide active play areas for this neighborhood. The only question in regard to the parkland which is shown in the development is in regard to park dedication credit: The location of the parks will not change, but the Park Committee will be reviewing the two parks at the June Park Committee Meeting to determine if any credit will be given to the developer in providing the parks within this neighborhood. FIRST PHASE OF DEVEIAPMENT The first phase of development will consist of 10 single family lots which have a square footage of 9,000 square feet + 16 twin home lots, or 32 dwelling units. The lot sizes for the twin hates range frau 13,950 to;,15.,000 square feet +. The cluster hone consist of 14 units and have lot sizes which range between 76,800 square feet to 79,500 square feet with the average"lot size per unit between 10,000-11,000 square feet. The multiple area will contain8 8-plexes and 1 4�lex for a total of 68 dwelling units and will have a lot coverage of 19:7$:--Th67 4C CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMYJN RIDGE MAY 26, 1981 PAGE THREE 8 plexes will have a density of 12.8 dwelling units per acre. The total dwelling units in the first phase will consist of 124 dwelling units. The preliminary plat of the first phase will allow the developer to provide alternate housing within the first phase, because the first phase will consist of single family houses, twin home units, cluster housing and the condaninium units. Besides platting the individual lots, the applicant has also platted two out- lots which will have to go through the public hearing process when the outlots are replatted. OVERALL PLAN DEVELOPMENT The overall planned development will consist of 16 single family units, 42 single family cluster units, 50 train home units, 192 8-plex condominium units and 300 units of apartment condominiums for a total of 600 dwelling units. As mentioned above in this report, the first phase will consist of 124 dwelling units. The second phase will consist of 6 single family lots, 42 cluster homes, 18 twin home units and 40 8-plex units. The third phase would consist of all 8-plex units and the fourth and fifth phase is the area which was originally proposed for limited business use, which now has been converted to multiple use and would contain approximately 300 dwelling units. The fourth and fifth phase will be the last area to develop and detailed site plans will be required at the time this area is platted. The overall planned development is within the density limits presently set in accordance with Ordinance 52. The applicant is proposing a total of 6Wdwell- ing units. The zoning ordinance would allow approximately 770 dwelling units. If the planned development is approved, the planned development agreement should be subject to the following conditions: 1. That a 75 foot half right-of-way be provided for Cliff Road. 2. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by City staff prior to any construction on the proposed site. 3. Detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff, and an adequate bond shall be provided and not released until one year after the land- scaping has been completed. 4. No variances shall be granted for setbacks on the single family, duplex or cluster home development unless it is related to topographic condi- tions. 5. The overall planned development now consist of approximately 605 dwell- ing units. The developer shall submit an environmental assessment work- sheet and have all the approvals necessary prior �Lo the construction of any dwelling. 6. The Planned Development agreement shall be prepared and approved by the City of Eagan prior to any construction on the site. 49 CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON RIDGE MAY 26, 1981 PAGE FOUR 7. The plat should be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission's and Minnesota Department of Transportation's review and cam-ent, because the site abuts County and State rights-of-way. 8. The developer shall provide garages for all of the single family cluster units. The developer shall also meet the specifications of the City Engi- neer for the private drives for the cluster units. 9. The planned development should be for a maximun of 6 years, and if the planned development is approved, the underlying zoning shall be removed and have an agricultural base. 10. - All applicable ordinances shall be complied with regarding parking, lot coverage, etc. DCR/jac a �0 • • TO: THE PLANNING COMMISSION? C/O DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PIER FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MAY 21, 1981 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON R= (ZACHMAN HOMES INC) Consideration of approval of this preliminary plat has been continued due to several concerns expressed regarding the zoning, access, buffer zone setbacks, etc. The developer has subsequently revised his proposed layout and has re- submitted a site plan dated 5-15-81. This revised site plan proposes five phases of a combination of single family homes, single family clusters, twin hares, 8-unit condamini.ums and multiple residential apartimments. ACCESS As discussed previously, access to this site is limited by restricted right- Of-Way access .fran T.H. 77 (Cedar Avenue Freeway) on the east, legally vacated public right-of-way access fran the Burnsville street system on the west and a singular access point through River Hills 9th presently developed on the north. Therefore, the major access to service this site must be provided frau County Road 32 (Cliff Road) . Because of the existing location of Slater's Road constructed by MnDOT during the construction of the Cedar Avenue Freeway, it is anticipated that this will became the major intersection providing the majority of turning movements upon completion of this proposed development. The secondary access located on the westerly side of this plat adjacent to the Dakota Electric Association substation will provide a secondary relief to the major intersection of Slater's Road upon full development. Until full development, it is anticipated that this secondary westerly access will be adequate to handle the first three phases as proposed. Upon initiation of the multiple density apartment complexes in the southeast corner, Slater's Road on the northside of Cliff Road -ill have to be constructed at that time. The connection to existing Metcalf Drive from River Hills 9th Addition will have to be constructed as a part, of Phase II, which is contrary to the plan ` submitted by the developer. Although the City staff is confident that the traffic generated from this proposed developmment will not use this Metcalf Drive connection through River Hills 9th Addition, there has been great con- cern and suggested alternatives ranging fran vacatim- the existing Detcalf Drive to restricting public access. Because this connection is necessary for emergency and maintenance vehicles to gain access to River Hills 9th, this physical connection must be provided for during the develcpment of Cinnamon Ridge. If this connection/extension of Metcalf Drive were to be completed and designated as a one-way street in the southerly direction, this would pro- hibit any additional traffic from entering the existing River Hills 9th Sub- division. It would, however, provide access for emergency and maintenance vehicles on their occasional need as required. If this were to be considered as a possibility, the engineering department would require that the minimum street width would be 28' which would require the permanent posting of "no parking" signs along its entire length. However, the: City has not previously initiated one-way traffic designation in the City.. It is felt that this J 44::� CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON RIDGE - ENGI'=NG RECaZff DATIONS MAY 26, 1981 PAGE TWO designation would ultimately be eliminated in the future to provide access to the River Hills 9th Addition from the new Cedar Avenue/Cliff Road interchange. The two proposed accesses on Cliff Road are established by maintaining the maxi- mum distance that can be obtained between the restricted right-of-way purchased by MnDOT and the west boundaries of this proposed plat. SIGNAL:IZATION Future signalization of the intersection of Slater's Road with Cliff Road will, in all probability occur at a future date when cross-traffic volumes warrant its installation. Warrants for a signalized intersection are met when the cross-traffic volumes of the minor legs of the intersection reach 3,000 vehicles per day. The anticipated total average daily traffic generated by the Cinnamon Ridge Addition upon its full development is approximately 3,700 vehicles per day. Discussions with MnDOT and Dakota County indicate that when signalizaticn occurs, there would be a 3-way cost participation agreement with MnDC7T parti- cipating in 25% of the cost, with the remaining 75% being split equally between the City and the County. Neither the County nor the State will participate in the cost of a signalization project until traffic volumes have been achieved warranting this installation. Once warrants are met, its scheduled installation must then be compared on a priority basis to other non-signalized intersections of equal or greater traffic volumes throughout the County. Until such a signal- ization project is initiated, it is anticipated that this intersection would have to be temporarily controlled by a 4-way stop sign. This would be similar to major intersections of Pilot Knob Road with Yankee Doodle Road and Wildwood Lane. TRAFFIC VOLUMES As mentioned previously, the ultimate average daily traffic generated frau the most recent proposed development, would be approximately 3,750 vehicles/day. This would amount to a total of approximately 1,100 total vehicles during a typical peak period (7-9 A.M. and 4-6 P.M.) . It is felt that these peak period traffic volumes would use the two accesses to Cliff Road on an equal basis. Further traffic volume breakdowns are as follows: J PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 TOTAL 1. Peak Period 88 155 205 275 373 1,096 2. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 876 668 504 700 980 3,728 Information received from Dakota County Traffic Engineering Department indicates that 1980 volume of traffic on Cliff Road was aj;jroximately 11,900 vehicles per day. Upon completion and the opening of the Cedar Avenue Freeway, this volume is expected to increase to 15,000 vehicles per day. The capacity of Cliff Road under its present design is approx imtely 23,000 vehicles per day. Dakota County CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON RIDGE - ENGINEERING RECalIIO DATIONS MAY 26, 1981 PAGE THREE anticipates that the demand on this road will exceed 30,000 vehicles per day by the year 2000. As such, additional future inprovements to Cliff Road will have to be provided when the needs dictate. In summary, based on the constraints placed on this acreage, the staff feels that the three proposed accesses are necessary and placed at their best design location. I will be available to address these tents in further detail at the Plan- ning Commission Meeting of May 26, 1981. Respectfully submitted, s A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/Jac i + V� � PAUL H. T11UGE do AssocuTEs. P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2202 SIBLET MEMORIAL NIGNWAY KAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA 82122 PAUL N. MAUGE RAOAI1sA Coos 212 2IEWN W ZIOIK041TMay 5, 1981 Tutn+ows 4'54.4224 KEVIN W. !ID! DAVID O. KELLlR Mr. Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator CITY OF EAGAN I 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Street Vacation Cinamon Ridge - Hillcrest Dear Tom: We have recently been directed to investigate the legality of street vacation } and resulting "stubbing" of two streets in Burnsville which would have pro- vided access to the Cinamon Ridge Addition in Eagan. The vacation process, which the City of Eagan also uses, is spelled out in MSA4412.851. It merely requires a petition by a majority of the owners whose property abut the street, two weeks published and posted notice and a proper hearing for passage of a resolution adopting the vacation. t A11 of this appears to have occurred in 1969 when the streets in question } were vacated. The fact that the resolution or notice of completion was never recorded does not invalidate the vacation proceedings as specifically stated i in the statute. It may be that the Burnsville City Council was required to make a finding in passing the resolution. 4412.851 provides that "No vacation shall be } made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so. . ." The minutes of the hearing do not make such a finding. However, the resolution, which we do not have, may contain some such wording. The hearing was almost 12 years ago. It is very possible that a Court would find.that anyone is estopped from contesting at this point. Even if it were not too late to contest the decision, it is very likely that the decision is valid even without a specific finding. It is our opinion that commencing a lawsuit at this point would not result in ' reestablishing the streets and would result in creating significant legal ex- pense. In addition, very likely the Burnsville Council would be prevailed upon to hold a revised vacation hearing and complete the process correctly. Very truly yours, � a Paul H. Hauge PHH:me �4. f n RESOLUTION1 NO. 2056 RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF KENTWOOD COURT AND A PORTION OF PERROT LANE (D-69-83) �s WHEREAS, on August 25, 1969 a Public Hearing was held by the Burnsville Village Council vacating a portion of Kentwood Court and a portion of Perrot Lane, and WHEREAS, a copy of the Council minutes and Document 69-83 were mailed to Dakota County Recorders Office requesting the recording of the vacation and only recently have found that a vacation can only be done by resolution, and WHEREAS, a petition was presented on August 8, 1969 requesting the vacation of the following described streets in the Village of Burnsville: That part of Kentwood Court lying east of the easterly right-of-way line of Galtier Drive and the east boundary of River Hills 10th Addition to the Village K. of Burnsville, Minnesota; and that part of Perrot Lane being and lying 30 feet west of the east boundary line of River Hills 11th Addition to the Village of Burns- ville, Minnesota, according to the plats thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds for Dakota County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the Petitioners are the abutting owners to said property, and WHEREAS, the Clerk of the Village of Burnsville fixed August 25, 1969 as the date for public hearing on said Petition in the Village Hall, Village of Burnsville, Dakota County, Minnesota and ; notice of said public hearing was published in the Dakota County Tribune, and WHEREAS, a public hearing upon said Petition was held at the aforesaid time and place and no objections having been raised and :f the matter having been fully considered by the Village Council of the Village of Burnsville, and said Council having determined that the streets are no longer needed for public purposes. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the.: gaid Petition be granted and the following described streets be, ana the same hereby are vacated in the Village of Burnsville. . ' + RESOLUTION NO. 2056 PAGE 2 6. That part of Kentwood Court lying east of the easterly right- of-way line "of Galtier Drive and the east boundary of River Hills 10th Addition to the Village of Burnsville, Minnesota; and that part of Perrot Lane being and lying 30 feet west of the east boundary line of River Hills 11th Addition to the Village of Burnsville, Minnesota, according to the plats thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register Ae of Deeds for Dakota County, Minnesota. -- Passed and duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Burnsville this 11th day of April 1981. D�7 Paul F. Scheunemann,-Ilayor ATTEST: Leslie J. Andetson, Clerk 64 r ZACHMAY HOMES May 18, 1981 Eagan Mayor & City Council Eagan Planning Commission Dear City Officials: As is readily evident from a quick visual inspection of the revised Cinnamon Ridge plan, considerable change has been affected towards sat- isfing the various issues posed during previous meetings and informal dis- cussions. Since the discussions concerning Cinnamon Ridge have stretched out over the last three month period, a listing of the previous issues and revision highlights may be helpful in your review. 1. Traffic (Cliff Road) - Concerns were raised previously regarding traffic impacts on Cliff Road stemming from Cinnamon Ridge and the Winkler site South of Cliff Road. Recently the Planning Commission suggested having an independent review of the traffic situation on Cliff to determine whether the facilities were capable of handling planned traffic levels or if not, what facilities would be needed. in response to those questions, meetings were held with both the State and County Highway departments. Both depart- ments agree that the road system is capable of handling projected traffic vol=es without significant disruptions and that signalization and median improvements in the Slater Road/Cliff Road intersection should and will occur when the two respective projects begin to generate enough traffic volume to meet "traffic warrants " according to the established "warrants" system. Both the State and the County indicated that they would put their review comments in writing and submit them to the City. 2. Metcalf Connection - The connection of Metcalf Road was a traffic related issue posed by the residents of River Hill 9th Addition. Since the City's objective was to provide access for emergency and maintenance vehicles and the residents objective was to minimize through traffic and destruction of the wooded features around the existing pond,a one-way road (south bound) has been proposed to accomodate both objectives. The road right of way and improved surface have been reduced to minimize the area of disruption during grading. J c Sr .' 7 i ' T 7760 MITCHELL ROAD. EDEN PRAIRIE MINiur-QnTa 9ZG4de M4*31 04'7 ac-2A 3. Burnsville Connection (Perrot Lane) - This connection has been a much discussed point of controversy between Burnsville and Eagan. In a recent special meeting the Burnsville City Council adopted a resolution reaffirming and clarifing their position against this through connection. Recognizing that the connection is not needed for adequate traffic move- ment in any case, no road connnection is indicated in the revised plan. It should be noted, however, that adequate space was designed into the plat to provide for Right of Way connection should the circumstances of this issue ever change and a road connection be deemed necessary and mutually desirable. 4. Commercial Land Use.- Substantial concern was raised regarding the proposal for commercial land use adjacent to intersection of TH77 and Cliff Road. While the office type commercial land use was included to absorb negative impacts from the adjoining roadways, high density multi- ple family housing was the preferred choice by the City Council. In response to this request we have converted the corner area to high density residential,. and simply reconfigured a portion of the existing R-4 zoning to accomodate high density uses. Since we do not, at this time, have a specific building plan for this portion of the site, we would prefer that acreage to simply remain desicnated as R-4 zoning. 5. Cluster lot size - In our original plan, several of the cluster areas fell slightly short of the 7500 square foot per unit minimum, despite the fact that the average lot size was well above the minimum. In revising the new plan we have designed all cluster areas to meet or exceed that area standard. In addition we have substantially revised the cluster design to allow for more park area in the north west corner of the site (by removing the twin homes around the two culdesacs jutting into that corner) and created a circular court drive with an attractive landscaped island in drive center. As was case before, the cluster area is owned & maintained by a homeowners association. 6. Park The absence of park area has been a continuing issue with the neighbors adjoining this plat. In response to that issue we have substan- tially redesigned the plat to allow for several functional park areas. As mentioned previously the cluster lot was redesigned and substituted for the twin homes in the northwest corner of the plat, thereby greatly enlarging the open space left for park in that corner. The resulting area is approximately 5-6 acres & includes two access points from the plat. Another park area of approximately 21 acres was created in the central portion of the plat separating the higher density eight unit condo area from the lower density twin homes. This park includes three access.points, one of whjch ,is a common area access through the condo development. These two areas have the potential, due to their size & shape to allow active recreation f6*rms such as football, soccer, volleyball, baseball, ice skating, etc. - In addition general play areas (tot lot equipment) can also be accomodated btlong with the active sports. _ Since F S E this type of recreation is now potential and each park area is physically accessible to all residents of the plat, the city park director is reviewing and reconsidering the area for potential City control. 7. Border Setback. The issue over the 150' setback has created much debate in the plata In an effort to reduce opposition by Burnsville neigh- bors regarding the excessive setback, the City Council suggested the place- ment of traditional single family homes along the border. As a compromise, a 9000 square foot minimum lot size was suggested. Responding to these suggestions we have redesigned the border area 'to include, with minor exception, all trad- itional single family homes on lots ranging from 9000 to over 20,000 square feet. the one exception is located near the midway point along the border where the street angles back towards the center of the plat. This large resulting area contains a low wooded depression and fairly high hill adjacent the border line. To minimize disruption to either of these natural features a large area was created and two clusters of single family homes were introduced. With rear yard setbacks of 75 to 140 feet on the two clusters, disruption to border features is eliminated entirely and as a consequence the line of site is effectively blocked by the woods and the knob of the hill along the border. As might be expected with all of the revisions undertaken to accomodate certain specific concerns, the resulting land use distribution has changed substantially. Perhaps the most obvious change is simply in the total number of housing units following the elimination of all commercial land use and replacement by high density residential. Based upon reaction to the new plan at a recent neighborhood meeting, it would appear that while we have satisfied all previous objections, certain neigh- bors still feel that the development density is too high. In anticipation of that type of comment we have outlined the density range allowable under Eagan zoning , the mid points of those allowable densities, and compared our proposed mix and densities to illustrate the modesty of our proposal. In reviewing the density information, on the following page, please note that we are not only substantially below the allowable density, but as well, significantly below the midpoint density! a Thank you for your continuing consideration. Sincerely; Tti HOMES, N . tep en T. Ry Director of Subdi i ions STR:cjc a DE:;SIS'/UNITS ALLOWABLE BY EAGAN ZONING ORDIP:ANCE District Density Range Acreage Unit Rance Total Units R-2 (low) 3 du/a (a) 40 120 (high) 5 du/a (a) 40 200 320 Midpoint Density 320 = 2 = 160 Units R-4 (low) 9 du/a (b) 32 288 (high) 22 du/a (b) 32 704 992 Midpoint Density 992 = 2 = 496 Units TOTAL MIDPOINT UNITS 656 Units (a) Assumes typical single family to twin home. (b) Assumes one to six story building with two bedroom units. PROPOSE DENSITY/DVTLLING UNIT DISTRIBUTION Proposed Proposed District Acreage Units Density R-2 36 108 3.00 du/a R-4 36 492 13.66 du/a Total Units 600 c Single Family 16 Single Family Cluster 42 108 Twin Home 50 8-Unit Condo 192 Apt. Condo 300 492 Total Units 600 6a . �.0 C, D • � ,��7 G? yi O Fr rn KENTWOOV S COURT _ '• _ S m mz 0 Z �o �. .� MZ-7- - N low 0 r z go a A mz , s _ - Ic ew 35 t��li en 6t ♦ ' O' N �- �.•w r•r��m_ -1 D Z _ o - o rn KENTWOOO� -- CD -- _ ---- COURT _ t _ _ J ' v Z. zD �ao f t __ • r � � �. � la o Lo -'- 1-11- �., 70lS 0 lt m - , -re "� S•ry er+.'- r civ -- M e� a + a� as ' � • cfc N Z _ O\ , . _ .0 o - O , m cn KEMTW 00 `- COURT _ r V mz 1 i N. W >oz D i2 m 3 ii} t jet rca- -- m fit Z _' _-72� _ ._- � a, 63 t -�' j. '•, - GOLF• .:,r.. Ind- •- ,. LB C - _( tib r•' -1 • - R 1 �q I In - . 7 RN 1 R-IV R i} R P UI _ Ind - - � R-II P N8 LB LS CSC i: r I � -•18 P LE R•111 r. .: ✓`� R41 R _ . ® RAV T « C i ' ; Ind P _ -_ � .LL R-1 CSC P B <. R-II R-N P GB _' RI P P t ; t R-111 RA R If LB LE E P 7 - ; R_i R111 il} P-41R III P E R-11 P41 P R-I I :.�s~ R-11 R-1I WI `I' 1.•..' ` n r�B LB cSc FtB P D .. - R. LB LB R-I = f y R-I m R-I r. v R-1 R-I R-11F � - P• � R-ll R-II R-► R-II j R-11 i Olt 40 F APoLE fA'L Er r FF - _-_ PF Na -- B -2 R B4�E ., -- �d f � SCHOOL 4 �. R-3C R - 4 --- ' E Q - �KIPK MARL tiszt:� `t .i PF c,4.. L�,.t�, T- csc -4 A _ #� + c C S C B r RIVER , T RB , L13P �' rESr �� Z/ Q LB �; ENTER R- i.- N i jt i A '� -� - . Q n Rel Q t r�W� jL 111 SLA, 1 } Qzo IJ t itL i Q ;r I 1 l SAS - 'o1 ;. j l�•'f3. May 26, 1981 Mr. Joe Harrison, Chairman Eagan Advisory Planning Commission 3975 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr. Harrison & Commission Members: Subject: Cinnamon Ridge The residents of River Hills 9th addition have been working for the past 90 days to modify the Zachman proposals to one which is the most viable for the existing neighborhoods that surround it and the City of Eagan as a whole. The developers' newest proposal which is being considered tonight was discussed in a small group session attended by representatives of our development and our Burnsville neighbors. Since that meeting the plans have been discussed in our neighborhood and the plans were made available to those concerned neighbors over the weekend. The City staffs recommendations were made available to us on Friday .which have caught us somewhat by surprise. It appears as if the compromise which the developer proposed and the neighborhood is reviewing are unacceptable to the City staff especially as it relates to the extension of Metcalf Drive. It appears from the conversations with the neighborhood that the following are issues that have not been adequately addressed by the developer's plans: 1) The density proposed in the R-4 area at 300 du's is too high. The developer has disproportionately increased the density when the commercial land use was changed the R-4 apartments. 2) The extension of Metcalf Drive was to be a narrow one way street designed to accomodate emergency and service vehicles. The developer proposed this to be installed when both accesses to Cliff are available. The City staff rejected this and recommended this be done with the Phase 2 portion of the development and that the design bei wide so it could be converted to two way traffic in the future. The existing neighborhood is vehemently opposed to this and is recommending that a 20 ft roadway be installed and that it permanently be made a one way southbound. Further, that it be installed only when both accesses to Cliff Road are installed. 3) The existing tree lines on the north and western boundaries should be main- tained and added to including the pond area. 4) The existing drainage should be with the best possible disruption or loss to the existing negotiation. We are hoping you will take our concerns under consideration when this project is discussed. Sincerely, \PENA 66 TO: THE PLANNING COMM4ISSION, C/O DALE C F&Z=, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIREI710R OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MAY 26, 1981 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON RIDGE (ZACHIMAN HOMES INC.) - CORRECTION In the report dated May 21st pertaining to traffic volumes for this proposed plat, the following corrections should be noted in consideration of reviewing these figures. The peak period traffic volumes for the five proposed phases should be revised as follows: Phase I - 88 Phase II - 67 Phase III - 50 Phase IV - 70 Phase V - 98 TOTAL 373 The figures presented in the May 21st report inadvertently added an already cumulative figure upon the ccopletion of each phase. Therefore, the total peak period traffic volume was estimated to be 373 vehicles instead of the 1,096 that was reported. If necessary, I can further explain this correction at the Planning Ccmuission Meeting. Respectfully submitted, iX", /_44� Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jac 67 � �� MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMP=ION EAGAN, MINNESOTA MAY 26, 1981 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, May 26, 1981 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan City Hall. Present were Chairman Harrison and Planning Commission Members Gits, Bohne, Wilkins, Turnham and Hall. Absent were Krob and Haywood. Also present were City Administrator Hedges, Public Works Director Colbert, City Planner Runkle, Assistant Planner Kurt Ulrich, Park Director Vraa and City Attorney Hauge. AGENDA After review, Wilkins moved, Bohne seconded the motion to continue the application of the McDonald Corporation for a conditional use permit for drive-through facility at 1999 Silver Bell Road and the public hearing con- cerning the application of Annie McLaughlin for conditional use permit for daycare center at 3710 Blackhawk Road until the next regular meeting. All voted yes. Upon further motion by Wilkins, seconded Bohne, it was Resolved that the balance of the agenda be adopted as revised. All voted in favor. MINUTES Gits moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to approve the minutes of the regular April 27, 1981 Planning Commission meeting as distributed. All voted yea. CZACHNAN ME - NAON RIDGE Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing regarding the applica- tions of Zachman Homes, Inc., for rezoning from R-2, Residential Double, and R-4, Residential Multiple to PD, Planned Development District and for prelimi- nary plat approval of Cinnamon Ridge consisting of single family lots, twin homes, and multiple dwellings located in the west half of the southwest quar- ter of Section 30 north of Cliff Road and west of Trunk Highway #77. Steve Ryan appeared for the applicant and stated that various meetings had been held r ' with neighborhood residents in an attempt to work out several issues concern- ing the proposed development. It .was noted that the Planning Commission has heard the application before and the applicant has now submitted revisions to ' its original proposals. Mr. Ryan also stated that several meetings had been held with MN/DOT personnel, County Highway Department personnel, and City staff regarding traffic counts on County Road #32, also the proposed one-way Metcalf Drive connection and other concerns of the Planning Commission, Council, and neighboring residents. Zachman is proposing a 24-foot street in the fourth phase as opposed to staff recommendation of a 28-foot width for Metcalf connection to be con- structed in the second phase of development. Mr. Ryan also stated that two potential connections with Burnsville, Kentwood Court and Parrot Lane, are not ba - S APC Minutes May 26, 1981 feasible after discussion with Burnsville City officials. It was noted that the Burnsville Council had recently adopted a resolution authorizing the street vacation which was commenced in 1969. The Commercial area was changed to R-4 zoning use and also indicated that all units would meet the 7,500 square foot minimum area within the cluster homes. The lots adjoining Burnsville were proposed for single family with an average setback of 60 to 65 feet. Discussion with the Park Committee was outlined briefly concerning the use of the 7-8 acres open space. Mr. Ryan presented various changes in the densities throughout the proposal and re- viewed the zoning plan and commercial conversion plan. He stated that addi- tional area with less density has been provided by shifting the density from areas adjoining the River Hills plats at the southwest corner of the develop- ment. Mrs. Teske then made a presentation objecting to the proposal including the Metcalf connection. She reviewed a number of aspects of the proposal and stated that it was not possible to determine density without a total plat, there is no tot lot provided in phase one. She stated that another neighbor- hood meeting had been held with Mr. Ryan where neighbors expressed concerns including traffic on Cliff Road with currently only one outlet to Cliff Road. There were concerns about reducing the right-of-way widths on the internal streets. Mr. Frank Torrio, a resident of Metcalf Drive, requested reduction of density to alleviate traffic within the development. Mr. John Flanigan, a resident on Clark Street, had a question about the development including the size of the common land parcels for the units. Mr. Ryan responded to a number of the questions and stated the Slater's Road intersection will be built when the fourth phase is developed. He further stated the sound wall may not be feasible because of cost and he was uncertain as to whether financing could be acquired for the R-4 areas adjacent to the southeast corner. There was dis- cussion concerning the service of the northwest corner with sanitary sewage and Mr. Ryan stated that the cul-de-sacs were pulled out of the northwest corner so as to avoid the possible need for a lift station. Two garages are provided in the single family cluster to make them, more traditional single family. Bonnie Olson was concerned about tree line under the power line and Mr. Ryan stated that there is no intention to take down trees except for some box elder trees in a low depression at the northwest corner in order to build a pond. Tom Kennedy favored the park proposal but objected to only one access to Cliff Road at the present time. A letter was submitted from residents in River Hills 9th Addition outlining some objections to the proposal. The Planning Commission Members next made statements and it was noted that the 28-foot right-of-way on Metcalf Drive is for future two-way traffic in the event it becomes necessary. There was discussion concerning signali- zation at Cliff Road and Mr. Gits suggested that the developer share in the cost or temporarily share in the cost with repayment at a later time after warrants are sufficient for the installation. Doris Wilkins explained that zoning is already completed and commended the developer for installing single family along the Burnsville line where R-2 zoning is .in existence. It was further noted that the total density could bp•loonsiderably greater than that ' } 2 69 P APC Minutes May 26, 1981 being proposed and it was recommended that trees be disturbed as little as possible in the Metcalf connection area. Mr. Hall stated that upwards of 900 units could possibly be constructed in the development by the zoning ordi- nance. Mr. Colbert stated that the first three phases would generate 50% of the traffic and that signals are not warranted. The R-4 area would change the density and the traffic count, however. Mr. Colbert also recommended that the Metcalf connection be developed with the second phase. It was noted that the clusters now provided for turn-around drivewaysand a homeowners association would be set up for the single family cluster area. There would be a separate homeowner's association for the eight-unit buidings as is required by F.H.A. .Member Wilkins suggested in the cluster homes that there be provision for 'emergency access for the circular streets and that the driveway be kept open at all times. The traffic volume from proposed Winkler Addition was also discussed. There was a question as to whether park credit would be given for the open space and at 8:25 the Chairman closed the hearing which had been convened at 6:30. Gits then moved to recommend approval of the rezoning to Planned Development as proposed by the applicant. Hall seconded the motion. All members voted in favor. Gits then moved to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Cinnamon Ridge, Bohne seconded the motion, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a 75-foot half right-of-way be provided for Cliff Road. 2. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be ap- proved by City staff prior to any construction on the proposed site. 3. Detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff, and an adequate bond shall be provided and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 4. No variances shall be granted for setbacks on the single family, duplex or cluster home development unless they are related to topographic conditions. 5. The overall planned development now consists of approximately 600 dwelling units. The developer shall submit an environmental assessment work- r sheet and have all the approvals necessary prior to the construction of any dwelling. i 6. The Planned Development Agreement shall be prepared and approved by the City of Eagan prior to any construction on the site. 7. The plat should be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission's and Minnesota Department of Transportation's review and comment, because the site abuts County and State rights-of-way. 8. The developer shall provide garages for all of the single family cluster units. The developer shall also meet the specifications of the City Engineer for the private drives for the cluster units. 9. The planned development should be fora�maximug of six years, and if .70 `fie f 3 a IT g i APC Minutes May 26, 1981 the planned development is approved, the underlying zoning shall be removed and have an agricultural base. 10. All applicable ordinances shall be complied with regarding parking, lot coverage, etc. 11. That a 28-foot road for Metcalf connection be constructed as a part of Phase 2 and be designated as a one-way street. 12. That the City pursue possible sharing of signalization cost by developer and temporary financing by the developer. All voted yes. I 1 � 071 Agenda Information Memo May 29 1981 Page Fifteen AL-HARP- --- 4pQNDITIONAL-U,SR- PERMIT-FOR-'(XJTSIDE- STORAGE B. Al Harp for a` Conditional, Use Permit to Allow Outside Storage located on Lot 4, Block 2- Halley' s First Addition -- A public hearing- was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their May 26, 1981 meeting. The 'public hearing was held to' consider an .appl - cation submitted by Al Harp requesting a conditional use permit to allow outside storage located on Lot 4, Block 2, Halley' s First Addition. The Advi.sory, Pianning' Commission is recommending approval of the conditional use permit' to the City Council. , For additional information on the matter, please refer to the . report as prepared by the City Planner, €ound. on page's through � For action A that was taken 'by the APC, refer to minutes enclosed on page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the Advs"ory, Planning Commission to approve the conditional use permit for outside `storage 'as requested by Al Harp. a. 14 ia A< k i. t i ZV� CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CCNDITICNAL USE PETIT APPLICANT: AL HARP LOCATION: ICT 4, B= 2, HALL Y'S 1ST ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: I-1 (IJGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 19, 1981 REPORTED BY: DALE C RiNKLE, CITY PIANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been sd3nitted requesting a conditional use permit to allow outside storage located on Lot 4, Block 2, Halley's 1st Addition. LAND USE Presently the property is zoned I-1 (Light Industrial District) and would allow outside storage as a conditional use within this zoning district. The land use plan shows the parcel designated as R-2 (Mixed Residential) with a density range of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. The land use guide plan also states that the guide plan is a guide, and the actual zoning of the property supersedes the pro- posed land use. Q�NII��1'I5 As you may recall, there has been a problem at the present location of Mr. Harp's business. For the past few years, Mr. Harp has been operating his business out of his hare which is located on Dodd Road. The business has received cornplaints regarding the noise which is generated in moving materials which Mr. Harp uses within his business. Presently, Mr. Harp is constructing a building on Wt 4, Block 2, Halley's Addi-. tion which he is proposing to use as an office and building for repair and stor- age. Since the property is already zoned and platted, Mr. Harp only had to ob- tain a building permit from the staff in order to construct this facility. However, he has to receive a conditional use permit if he in fact wishes to store any of the materials which he uses in his business outside of the proposed structure. Therefore, the application for conditional use is being applied for. The proposed building Mr. Harp is constructing contains 3,776 square feet. The lot contains 39,750 square feet. The lot coverage of the stricture is 9.4% of the lot. Mr. Harp has met all setback requirements for the building and is pro- posing roposing to enclose the entire area surrounding the outside storage area with fencing for security purposes. CITY OF EACsAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — AL HARP MAY 26, 1981 PAGE TWO If approved, the conditional use permit should be subject to the following con- ditions: 1. That Mr. Harp sign an agreement drafted by the City Attorney that he will not object to his fair share of assessments for utilities once the utilities are approved for this addition. 2. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted showing the screening around the outside storage area. 3. Storage shall not be allowed to exceed the height of the fence. 4. The parking area shall have an asphalt surface and concrete curbing put around the perimeter of the parking area. 5. Dust control measures shall be used an the outside storage area. 6. Storage shall only be allowed within the area designated by a fence. 7. All the materials that are presently being used for his business shall be relocated to Lot 4, Block 2, Halley's 1st Addition. DCR/j ac 7�' C> 0 0 ' O L z loq Olt ♦7 D . Lb a 0 b o � _ , � � : ► . o � fr 'Will T 4 O st A C1 t X I f i RB GB '-•- _ t7\�Lr Ind. In d COMMERCIAL ` -R, +� - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT E al. _.- .-Ind... ' Ind - R 1 - LB _ p R4 Ind7�'k. R-1 R ,. T G8 41 Ind R11 E Inc. Ind t, N$ LB R 11 R-tll R-II R-II —. R-1 „ LB R-II -- CSC p « R 0 Ind = S LB RI a . A R III „ , J a...,,.R-I -- ►. R R _ Ind _. P a.� �. HAL- R-II 3 Z : - RLI R-Y .1• R-1 IN t R-II - R! HIS _ --- - ,.. ,� ,� ti R-1 -P P R-t P R{ `. R-II _. R-II P-III R-11 LB .. M ►. E' rB R-! R-111 RB R-ai :z: -;, R-ift R-ill a: ,: — CSC/G81 RLI - - --_ R-II; R I ? _ R-III R I R. ;' R-II R-1i "� " ".r� ?e�" -'tet I'� ...__.t;..- _���•} (_ ,� � - _,~.) Fit ..,.' RI • j 1, - .a 4 LB R-I P .° R-I S O+WtA t i- p PARK ��-. R-If _ R-i' R-II ,` p P P �src* +', { �-" .ri- • F'alit Com\ L rw i � � ROSEMOUNT s2 I.. `r t / r PK R-I A t 1 EOAk .512 ' `•+.,►..T� i1}, , Ir .f,�.�J "�;T� .l;�l�:'t �.d �1!+•��,rl�••✓.ter.i, �Q A G3 48 Ke ;•') r.�3'e`L �> '"'l'r 2 t ate`t'3 a:,° .i VI ,,�'��+ ,.,a� >' �::, .•?` N�' �; A L I MAR �'aJ't'.�J;•. rJ; S'�.:�:3,J�}^.I' ',)r:� ADDyO�TI.{E •}:yJ+i,�j•.r.;:'`} . .•��'L Jam}.•..J•.�`�_ �',?�Sr ; .J - A�W A R 23 W 5 000 AG � � p t 77 AL HARP OQ?SIDE STORAGE — HALLEY'S IST ADDITION The public hearing regarding the application of Al Harp for conditional use permit to allow outside storage on Lot 4, Block 2, Halley's 1st Addition was theta=eonvened by Chairman Joe Harrison. Mr. Al Harp was pre=se-nt and it was noted that the property is currently zoned I-1 with Land Use Plan indi- cating R-2 mixed residential. It was noted Mr. Harp's present place of busi- ness on Dodd Road has received complaints concerning noise generated and storage of materials and Mr. Harp has now constructed a building in Halley's Addition. Lot coverage would be 9.4% and it is proposed that the entire area , would be enclosed with security fencing. Several neighboring residents appeared, some of whom objected to the proposal for outside storage of paint products noting Mr. Harp is in the tennis court painting business, and stating that there is inadequate fire protection without City water. There is also no City sewer available and further the railroad right-of-way has caused fire danger in the past. Water runoff was stated as another problem without storm sewer in the area. Mr. Ed DuBois, a current neighbor of Mr. Harp, appeared and favored the change. Gits moved, Bohne seconded a motion to recommend to the Council that the appl`cation be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That Mr. Harp sign an agreement drafted by the City Attorney that he will not object to his fair share of assessments for utilities once the utilities are approved for this addition. 2. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted showing the screening around the outside storage area and shall include an adequate landscape bond to be released no sooner than one year after landscaping is completed to the approval of the staff. 3. Storage shall not be allowed to exceed the height of the fence. 4. The parking area shall have an asphalt surface and concrete curbing put around the perimeter of the parking area. 5. Dust control measures shall be used periodically on the outside storage area. 6. Storage shall only be allowed within the area designated by a fence. 7. All of the equipment and materials that are presently being used for his business shall be relocated to Lot 4, Block 2, Halley's 1st Addition. All voted yes. ! S a Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 Page Sixteen F. WAIVER OF ,PLAT- -- CHES MAR EAST 2ST ,ADDITION C. Wayne Blilie for a Waiver of Plat i'n Order to Relocate the Center Lot Line Between Lots 19 and '20, Block 2, - Ches Mar East 16t Addition --- A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission to consider an application submitted by Wayne Blilie to adjust the center lot line between lots 19 and 20, Block 2, Ches Mar East 1st Addition. The City Council. and Planning Commis- �sion has recently considered tae: same waiver of plat application for Tollefson for the same reasons. The APC is recommending approval for the granting, of the waiver of plat to the City Council. For additional information on the matter, please refer to the Plan- - ping Assistant' s report, a copyof which is found : on pages Oy throughfif , anti fpr 'information regarding action taken t e APC, p ease refer to those minutes; a copy of which is enclosed on page R ,' ACTION TO BE CONSIDEREDON THE MATTER: To, either approve or deny the waiver of plat as recommended , for approval by the APC by Wayne Blilie as described. "r r ' r k fid' { t. s t d 1 5 - �„ 1 � � y •x; �r A AC x ` CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: MU-VER OF PLAT APPLICANT: MkYNE BLILIE LOCATION: IR'I'S 19 & 20, BLOCK 2, CHES MAR EAST IST ADDITION, SECTION 27 EXISTING ZONING: RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX UNDER A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20, 1981 REPORTED BY: KIWIS G ULRIC H, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED An application has been submitted to adjust the center lot line between Lots 19 and 20, Block 2, Ches Mar East 1st Addition, Section 27. COMMENTS At the APC Meeting on April 28, 1981, a similar waiver of plat was granted to Burford Construction to adjust the center line between Lots 23 and 24, Block 2, Ches Mar East 1st Addition. At that tine, staff was requested to research whether any other duplex lots existed in this addition which were below the 7,500 foot mini.mm. Staff review concluded that Lot 19, Ches Mar East 1st Addition, at 5759 square feet was the only other lot of this subdivision which is currently undersized. The proposal is to move the northern boundary of Lot 19, 23 feet to the north. This would increase the size of Lot 19 to 8,519 square feet and would decrease the size of lot 20 frau 12,000 square feet to 9,240 square feet. Thereby, both Lots 19 and 20 would be approximately equal in size and would each meet the mini- mum requirement of 7,500 square feet per duplex lot. If approved, the waiver of plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1. The City will retain all existing drainage and utility easements. 2. All other applicable City ordinances shall be omplied with. KGU/jac 10 PLOT PLAN Scat: - t inch - ^:'i44, t 49 40 .. Z. 77 ` T . ..0.- ,!. .- -_�- - _ ' ?flus', show location of streets, lot and proposed buildings, give lot dimensions.(Lot comer-, ,are to be staked before appraisal is requested.) s POND 'U[[LEV 0tC 4976FA S T (I �•G�\ � r u.o o0 6 •�asl •a n» 234:7 •� ,�'�o ,.' •tam 1 O \ o +_ a - ` •ice,.�1!, '•`_ : ..' ,�� i �' ..,1�A ,► -!. ^- .� w +ems ; Jr. 2 i t.iA Y '.�� ao 00 •6^' •07se' t s• g 3 L A or ID a. 1 . v ;01 Ar 40 7 AN 2234 •W / S• O.e - '� 4�^ .I�A� moi �� L\ � i eek i i• f; •g ?��►� �v/ '1 '� 2 ' ~i ,�•,� + • � Ai � � SCJ •`� I 8 13 3 i`,,�6d -m°0. ac p0 , 6 ;' S r �►� �� t� •t R'4, pt s ..o-zx g 12 4 ' • �� �.�� , +-'• ±f• '� �ar•••ia �- •�14� .c l 'D4q+ - w6Ad,s•tAy ,� 5 g 2 W 6 ,� Af 'i 3 k _ 10 l 440 o4__J u no - aPu M't- 4 {{ all 00 - _ M469s 9, oc > 6 8 2 P 1 4 d 7 z c 8 9 1 F, .*Oak9s 4-s e 3, n 3i-- - `40000 - -un--- `� d •,_ 3 S`�'�' �f ' a ` Q i -sa•ax sa•c- J 2 KIRK "? _ >;'."•.:35 For a J t 23 - ! �{— a4M•3ss2 t - .3v to" •1, Z .` as•• -Wr—! W u y22 21 Z 9 i f _ =I :2q Q �... 10 a 'M , [•:r -- fO_W. —`.t._ ,. . _aw.f.w ilE.M•t 33 25 18 -- - - - -- -w �•�.,. ti 6 and __ 2. 32 17 • W 4 rd♦ rot / _ 1 •1e e• 3- !•� ♦jr 2I • '� .•'ys:i.i..r oil ! rs .:r _.■- . 27 t,a 15 30 v •.,°,. •r..,.. - ' •»• COUNTY ROAD // ROAD y Q Z �� r - zip - RB .... Slnd . GOLF ' Ind. - _ or `• • : _ R. — _ RI Ina _ - L B • _ P RAInd _ - RI e R NInd.R8D R•II f R P Ind R41 P NB LB R N LB R-II CSC p R-II f" P -. R-11 - +e - LE _,. R-1 R•II `T Rill' w� qt.,.. R-1 .- RIR-1 P R-11 y.•.. s ! ® - R-IV RIII _ `u y P ", HALLR-II R I R-H Ind itHS Csc P -- R-11 R- P-1V R-1V RR-11 E P R-1 p_ R-1 e GB R-III LB E �- LB E a C RB R-ill � R-I R1{I R-III R-Iif R III CSC/GB! tirt. R-111 RI• `R 1 3 �`� !..._.. 711 y. P E C P R-11 ' R-II R I; Rai R-11 �` - _�I P --, R-IINB _.RI CSC LB LE4J FM R- LB D LB - R-1 P `Y R-I R-I R-I '' w• S R-I R-fl I P R-11 j R_11 R-II ..[. P ` f, , PF : PK Cl PF �` ?�"-'� � •�+ � Via;< i.�+: P N6 R- 3 - W „ A R -i PF a PF AM TT PF `• f. c Vic > A :,�"`` _ -`rte •• ,:��- ,`*0DITICA. Er K l ; Wbh $ :Sire PK PFE >�= �� x- "� A R_3__ A R- ' sir �% � `�i •r s ~ -�'1����•i,j'til �l tir ';i'') Y {�.-..�.�_..•s s� }` ..:J,f i J ', ���:J':.;�i1'•��r�lf{{�+�lc �. )_•-�e yV-�r`.� J' Af ) + SIMS p h N,,1..1�j ). „v„}.J `-�R , ,1- . . ,is•� ,160 PF t �J t f t f '��•ll3.. 2'.� C�t�.' ?) �:J, `�f _ n � �A i- PARKVIEW GOLF ` s.}� G0L .• _•.� lJ ,1 mss+ ` y1 +? ..� '„J ti~��J. •�./`�,J-�. i�� .i.;� f ,�1"f >:%-.�:�5�i r:T`�f�J :i`�•'�r•��r;�;.t��,. �ie .i� -� ,., J a �..-�} COURSE .� ji ,-.�_�,� sr ? t, r,} -�•+.! -,r f�'� !✓ +�� -,5, .!,'f )\��)y��,�� �., �%��si•i .1� -� 'J •.j-' ,i .„ +V� f,,,I l,,a:'yj�j ..�J:.f�}i._ ' :� .}" � -�,,- .�' J ,�! - .�.(�, a •y ti.) � ,.f � :)�7J � ,`�.�r's�'',3y'�v,,,��,?,?`.�'^.1 w'W� �j� �'.�`a'•, 1 �R'C:`' y�-�•`s t�.1.1I J, 1�`j~ ��j' 1 i � _. LZ ,. � ►���.N�) J •'Y�,��� y�� �l��1'lJ� '��J 7 ^��}•1.�4 'AI"�'• ,- +�m •. APC Minutes May 25, 1981 CHES MAR BAST 1ST ADDITION — VAIQBR OF PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of Wayne Blilie for waiver of plat to readjust the lot line between Lots 19 and 20, Block 2, Ches Mar East 1st Addition was next considered by the Planning Commission. Mr. Blilie was present and there were no objections. Wilkins moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The City will retain all existing drainage and utility easements. 2. All other applicable City ordinances shall be complied with. All voted yes. F Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981' Page Seventeen RICHARD STUKE -- CONDITIONAL :USE PERMIT D. Richard E. Stuke for a Conditional Use Permit for an 'Indoor Recreational Center and On-Sale 3.2 Beer - A public hearing was held before the .,APC at their May 26, 1981 meeting to consider two (2) applications submitted by Richard E. Stuke. 1. A request for a conditional use permit to allow an indoor recreation center for the building which was constructed for Jerry Lewis Theatre and more s. recently used a , the Juke Box located in the Cedar vale Shopping Center area; and x 2. ` A request for an on-sale 3.2 beer license located at the same location. The Advisory Planning Commissionn is recommending approval of both applications to the City Council. It was learned at the APC meeting that several amusement devices are 'planned as a part of Mr. Stuke' s `operation. It will be necessary to consider a conditional use permit for the amusement devices at the ne*t APC meeting. For a copy . of the City -Planner' s report on this matter, please refer to pages 17' throughFor a copy of the minutes relating to this agenda a:item, refer o . r ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED' ON THE MATTER; To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC to approve, the conditional use permit for an indoor recreational; center and on-sale 3.2 beer for Richard E. Stuke. SPECIAL NOTE: A memorandum addressing the 3.2 , on-sale beer and wine license was received from ;,the City Attorney's office. It appears there are various problems with issuing a beer and wine 4 _° license to this proposed establishment. A ° copy of the letter is enclosed on page _ for your review. h rf fet x t • • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: ODNDITIONAL USE PEFMn APPLICANT: RICHARD E ST(JKE LOCATION: PART OF THE DE-4 OF SECTION 19 EXISTING-ZONING: - CSC (CCMKJNITY SHOPPING CATER DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20, 1981 REPORTED BY: DALE C RJNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATICN SUBI,=M: The first application submitted is a request for a conditional use permit to allow an indoor recreation center for the building which used to be the Jerry Lewis Theater or Juke Box located in the Cedarvale Shopping Center. The second application submitted is a request for on-sale 'liquor located at the same location. LAND USE Presently, the property is zoned CSC (Community Shopping Center District) and an indoor recreation facility and on-sale liquor are permitted through a con- ditional use permit within the CSC District. The land use guide plan.-also de- signates this area as a Ccm munity Shopping Center District. MMMEN!'S As you may recall, in December of 1980 this proposed parcel, the former Juke Box and Jerry Lewis Theater., appeared on the Advisory Planning C=mission agenda and City Council agenda for this structure to be used for the new location of Cism's. This use was denied by the City Council. The building is still vacant, and Mr. Stuke, who presently owns Eugene's Inc. on the east side of Beau D' Rue Drive is proposing to relocate his present facility and convert this vacant building into an indoor recreation facility, a sale's area for his present business and a ware- house where he would be storing his stock. The indoor recreational facility would consist of pool tables and game tables. Mr. Stuke is also requesting that a conditional use permit for on-sale liquor which has been revised to only include 3.2 beer and wine also be issued for this recreational facility. This 3.2 beer and wine license is different fran the original application for on-sale liquor. In reviewing the site plan, it appears that the lot in which the building is located contains approximately 28,500 square feet, er .65 acres. The building contains 9,130 square feet. In calculating the parking spaces, it appears that approximately 46 parking spaces should be provided for the building. QTY OF EAGAN CONDITIQQAL USE PERMIT - RIMAM E STUKE MAY 26, 1981 PAGE TWO If Mr. Stoke receives approval, he should submit detailed plans to the City showing the amount of parking and the amount of square footage for each of the uses for the building. If appr(_-Aad, the conditional use permit shall be sub- ject to the following condition,:.: 1. A detailed site plan shall be submitted and approved by the City as to the square footage for each of the uses-the recreational center, the sale's area for the pool tables and the warehouse facility. 2. A detailed site plan shall be submitted providing for at least 46 park- ing spaces for the building. If the 46 parking spaces cannot be pro- vided on this particular lot, a cross easement will have to be obtained to allow for this parking. 3. The conditional use permit for the 3.2 beer and wine shall be subject to all of the conditions in the liquor ordinance dealing with 3.2 beer and wine. DCR/jac C t7 r4 A p p { d . �.,,;mss-• � _ ! - - s .:: � . .`. STEA a� �•. "y,.� � - Jam'. ob Iv ID -, /�'_ �' - + �•-.sem i t •��rAr.._r}�' •- � fir• �V�� �._ �. JERRY lEwls HOP a I _ /yam �y•"rL� - t� !. a,. _ �' •.�• �' - - . i r '�� '�, r,• �.,C". _- ' ... .� � - - ,i - ��>.. .•fix _v ! :- �,� _ i' _. � Y'._a,t � f .s Yl.M; �, :i;.• ''... Ft,s ••� -•. _. �- r` v� �,. � r .•,p, f� . � i�_ ?,' .- +4- d r •n -. � .- ,.. �� � r, '1,4 �_ ° jf 'afar. r Ate-: tib - r'4 •'r., ►. "`y° t " -�...; ..:�,� '17 =+..� y w '�:� . .�s •y MT � ' RE GCLF - _ Ind. P. fr. Rl R&D_ R•i' ---- - P-10 Ind LB — /� LB R-II P FF II -' CSC R—II 18- - LE a ' — '• ' I; � jay`.. - � Y •F R III d-' R-1 R-1v t _. IR-111 Ly HALL R-il Ind f R r i C5c p - �1'' _ R-II R-i R—I" i f • \ V#A R- R-II . r R-III I LB F _ N RB R-I R411R 111 I "-flf R-N, R E Q_ —'i't_` P41 �. NB W, LB R—III LB Ei•1 ••^•f r ti.,.•., CSC . .. J i i R \ ` lE3 D LB =- R-1 P .a° R-I R-f R-f 1 : � R-I R-II P; R-11 R-N R-fl Pte.. . P APPLEvA`.E V LI t L I r r •' INDUST IAL ; ,PARK , . _ 4 • - 18 R-1 o L I `PR-i TANK I Ar)p TI R- A R -4 - A 4 R - 3 ,4 L IL LI R -i G _ R - 4 R- FV L I GAN MET! 0 CENTS SILL Ll ODD H ORUN4 LB .'' — . 12 esc � - r Gavs I CSC PF 1 L, E7o„ A ad ; , - Li 1 _ Ll AR GB GB PEEN ,'1) pr � R -4 �,, 79. CBDARYALS THUTER — WNDITIONAL USE PERMIT The public hearing regarding the application of Richard E. Stuke for conditional use permit to allow indoor recreation center and for on-sale beer and wine in the building formerly housing the Jerry Lewis Theater and Juke Box at Cedarvale Shopping Center was next convened by Chairman Harrison. In addition, Mr. Stuke submitted an application for on-sale 3.2 beer and wine license at the same location. Mr. Stuke was present and there were no ob- jections to the application. He stated that he is negotiating to lease the Cedarvale Theater building and the building has excessive square footage and thus the reason for a proposed game room including pool hall. One-third of the building would be for recreational purposes, one-third for warehousing, and one-third for retail sales of game and pool table equipment. The recrea- tion center would be open until 11:00 p.m. on all evenings other than Fridays and Saturdays when it would be open until 12:00 p.m. There was a question concerning parking noting that there were only about 23-24 available spaces and therefore cross easement with the owners of the shopping center would be required. It was noted that the Game Ordinance requires a conditional use permit if the number of electronic games exceeds the minimum according to the ordinance. There were also concerns about beer and wine being consumed in the game area and the possibility of minors getting access to the beer and wine together with beer and wine ordinance issues. Gits moved, Bohne seconded a motion to recommend approval of the application for the two conditional use permits subject to the following conditions: ` 1. A detailed site plan shall be submitted and approved by the City as to the square footage for each of the uses -- the recreational center, the sales area for the pool tables and the warehouse facility. 2. A detailed site plan shall be submitted providing for at least 46 parking spaces for the building. If the 46 parking spaces cannot be provided on this particular lot, a cross easement shall be obtained and approved by the City to allow this parking. 3. The conditional use permit for the 3.2 beer and wine shall be subject to all of the conditions in the liquor ordinance dealing with 3.2 beer and wine. All voted yes. 1 PAUL H. HAUGE ASSOCIATES, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 8908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA 33122 PAUL H. HAUGE AREA CODE 612 BRADLEY SMITH May 29, 1981 TELEPHONE 434-4224 KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER RICHARD J. KRAMBEER Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator CITY OF EAGAN 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: 3.2 Beer and Wine License in Combination with Game Room on Beau D' Rue Drive Dear Tom: We have been requested to look into the legality of a beer and wine license in conjunction with a permit for amusement devices within a CSC district. Eagan Ordinance Section 52.07 C.2 does provide for a conditional use for on- sale liquor and 9 does provide for conditional use for commercial recreation within a building. However, there may be a problem with the sale of 3.2 beer or wine within a room containing minors which we assume would be the situation with the amuse- ment devices. M.S.A. Section 340.035 Subdivision 1 (1) was amended in 1976 deleting the prohibition for loitering by minors (under 19) in an establish- ment selling non-intoxicating liquor. However, Section 340.11 Subdivision 17 does provide for more restrictive restrictions on the part of municipali- ties. Eagan Ordinance No. 43.11 Subdivision l provides that "no person shall permit any minor as defined by Minnesota Statutes to loiter in a room where non-intoxicating malt liquor is being sold or served, unless accompanied by his parents or legal guardian." A 1953 Attorney General's Opinion states that a minor unaccompanied by his parents or guardian who played a pinball machine in establishment licensed for sale of non-intoxicating liquor was loitering in the room in violation of Minnesota Statutes. Eagan Ordinance 64.03 provides that an on-sale wine license shall be issued only to a restaurant. Restaurant is defined in 64.01 Subdivision 2 as an establishment with a minimum seating capacity of 40 people with meals served at tables. In conclusion, it appears that there would be some serious problems with issuing a beer and wine license to this establishment. The establishment would probably not meet the requirements of the definition of restaurant for the sale of on-sale wine. Operation of amusement devices by minors unaccompanied by parents or guardian, would be considered loitering in vio- lation of City Ordinance passed in 1972 prior to the amendment of state law. Ver ruly yours, .a David G. eller DGK:me cc: Martin DesLauriers `K ,Agenda Information Memo `a May 29, 1981 Page Eighteen WAIVER OF PLAT, LOT 111, BLOCK 19 SISLEY TERMINAL IND. PARD E. Michael C Gresser for. a Waiver of Plat in Order to. Split an Industrial Lot for Two Building Sites, located on Lot 11, Block 1, SibleyTerminal Industrial Park -- A 'public hearing was held by the APC at their May, �6, 1981 meeting to consider an application submitted by Michael C. Gresser requesting a lot split for Lot 11, Block' 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park, - in order to allow an additional building, site. The APC is recommending approval of the waiver of plat to the City Council. For additional information on the matter, please refer to' the City Planner' s report, a copy of which is enclosed on pages through q� for your reference. For a copy of the action that was taken by a APC, please refer to page for a copy of, thos'e minutes. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER; To approve or deny the y recommendation of the APC to approve the waiver of. plat to split tot 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. ,s r. i 'k✓ �T ,a.5 '. 'fir � s F'a. R CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: Va= OF PLAT APPLICANT: MICHAEL C GRESSER LOCATION: IDT 11, BLOCK 1, SIBLEY TER4INAL INDUSTRIAL PARK EXISTING ZONING: I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 19, 1981 REPORTED BY: DATE C MME, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submittedesti requ ng to split Lot 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park in order to allow an additional building site. LAND USE Presently, the parcel is zoned I-1 (Light Industrial District) which allows office warehouse as a permitted use within this zoning district. The land use guide also shows this parcel as an Industrial District. COMMENTS Presently, Trot 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park has industrial buildings located on the western portion of this lot. In order to build another building on this parcel, the lot first has to be split and approved by the City in order for a building permit to be issued. In splitting the one lot into two lots, the west portion, or west half of the lot will contain approximately 1.6 acres and would have a lot coverage of 16.8%. The new lots created would contain approximately 1.9 acres and would have a lot cover- age of 35%. The 35% is the maximum lot coverage allowed in a I-1 (Light Industrial' District) . According to Ordinance 52, the parking requirements for this facility would be 61 parking spaces. This calculation is based on that only 10% of the building is used for office and 90% of the building is warehouse. If more than 10% office is provided in this structure, additional parking will have to be required. The proposed facility meets all setback requirements of Ordinance 52. If the pro- posed structure will have any loading docks with this facility, they should be located on the west side of the building. If approved, the lot split should be subject to the following conditions: 1 � ' CITY OF EAGAN MICHAEL C GRESSER - MIVER OF PLAT MAY 26, 1981 PAGE TWO 1. A detail landscape plan shall be approved by the City staff, and a landscape bond of $2,000 shall be required and not released until one year after the landscaping has been ompleted. 2. No loading docks shall be located on any side of the building which abuts a public street. 3. No more than 10% of the building should be used as office unless additional parking has been approved by the City. DCR/jac {V f E 4 ; a t t , x E 'x ; b ; 4yp-14 --- •�—__ lir r { it Ha, y = T y a , {Flf 1 f J I R t 97 � a r RB GCLF • .' - -f;�••5' ,..E..a! ..` - .- ,,L i Ind. R. z - • I - .Au Lb • 7 J R•N R&D- R-;; ---- R•III - Ind. N8 LB - R-II LB CSC - NW �... P REP le lot .y' 1111 y --- _. _ ® R-IV P ;u; HALL R-il Ind jj P R-1 .•. R-il Z-1- R-11 R- R-11 - LB } R-11f 1 Lp E — RB R-;U R-iI( "•Ft R R III -11r —.. RNi s` ;. R1 —� Rai C P E R�I t: . �,. fill R-11 ., R-II NB - ' LB R-111 LB j J _ p Q LB �� B LB = R-I r ` r° R-I R-1 m C R-I 11 a.o ` R-1R-II PF ' r--; R-II R-N R-t" R-II ( -{' R-II 1 ° P T i APPLE VALLEY Y - 'l OL Ala ' A. - FP - - IL /� ,• - _ Ll All +,~ all L f * E qD0 - �� %' r VITr Ll R-3 !+' a I S t R-4 g e R- •' N.. Sia.EY TI - .. i L I MIHq NOUSt�Ia AA R-1 .. � Ll A - i R- , r R-3 t it a IT RID R-41 „ LI R-4 NB o j j�• \ate �E PCO P_Ir E . I ( L INDUS lAL� -PARK', v� J �' R-{ MICHAEL GRESSER WAIVER OF PLAT — SMM TBRMIHAL INDUSTRIAL PARR The hearing regarding the application of Michael C. Gresser for waiver of plat to split Lot 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park to allow an additional building site was next convened by the Chairman. Lot 11 has three industrial buildings located on the western portion of the lot and the intent is to split the lots with a 1.6 acre westerly portion and a 1.9 acre easterly portion. It is proposed that an industrial warehouse be constructed on the easterly lot which would create 35% lot coverage. Mr. C.R. Schumacher ap- peared for the applicant as did Mr. Gresser. It was noted that there would be no outside storage on the easterly lot and Ms. Wilkins indicated that outside storage would require an additional application for that purpose. Gits moved, Hall seconded a motion to recommend approval of the applica- tion subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by the City staff, and a landscape bond of $2,000 shall be required and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 2. No loading docks shall be located on any side of the building which abuts a public street. 3. No more than 10% of the building should be used as office unless additional parking has been approved by the City. All voted yes. ' 100 i Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 Page Nineteen DOUGLAS R. WITT -- VARIANCE TO BUILD A GARAGE F. Douglas R. Witt for a Variance to Build a Garage within the 30' Setback , Requirements Along a Public Street, located on Lot 4`, Clearview Acres -- ' A public hearing was -held` by the APC in order to consider an application submitted by Douglas R. Witt for a variance. from the 301 frontyard setback requirement for ,a residen- tial single district; Mr. Witt would like to build a 22' x 24' :garage fourteen feet from the front Tot line fronting on Chapel Lane. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval A of the variance. For additional informat ,airy on this item, please ; refer to the Planning, Assistant's report, a, copy of which is en- closed on pages , through° - ' ' For a copy of the minutes of the APC action,pTeaseirefer to. page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC to grant the variance for a street setback dor a; garage applied for by 'Douglas R. Witt. . r W. l F t z �a °' a,�• � ;� �' day ` �.+k r V isr * � "�S r > '€F CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE - S'T'REET SETBACK FOR A GARAGE APPLICANT: DOUGLAS R WITT LOCATION: 535 CHAPEL LANE EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 26, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20, 1981 REPORTED BY KURTIS G ULRICH, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUB=IED: An application has been requested for a variance fron the 30 foot front-yard setback requirement for a residential single district. The applicant wishes to build a 22 x 24 foot garage fourteen (14) feet from the front lot line, fronting on Chapel Lane. CQVZ=S The proposed garage structure would be detached from the existing house. Ac- cess to the garage would be gained by an existing driveway off of Chapel Lane (considered a local access road according to the City's Thoroughfare Plan) . The lot which neighbors to the west currently has a garage upon it which stands about 15 feet from the front lot line. One other lot further west within a block and on the same side of the street, has a structure which is also stand- ing closer than 30 feet from the front lot line. These structures were never granted variances but rather were "grandfathered" into the present situation when the zoning ordinance was passed in 1975. The lot in question has a total area of 22,500 square feet, and lot coverage with the proposed structure is within the allowable limits. If approved, the variance should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Access to the new structure will be provided by the existing driveway off of Chapel Lane. 2. The City will retain all existing drainage and utility easements. 3. All other City ordinances will be complied with. KGU/jac 102. r r Ao�c�E" s9' 2 y K � t o v lis �'" T7 � g �— C p-h- eL- 103 E"Al P-P w. SSS Z all i Lets ` ? SALLY �'_ - y • p� s � 0 3 0VPKRCEL 4 �j .•C IR�LE A NE -71. /4 4 a s �� 17 ie /9 .I � �����«^ ,t • _ / /. - ` \ LOV1S 'tj-sN/rid �^d,'o' 84L, A /i r111 q -fir � „�y/vi� L'h s,v 0'a►/eTsi7ir ; 'i aq 3q — � r i { GB PB E... _ Ind GOLF ^ . Ind. — COMMERCIAL - - PLANNED DEVELL�-AENT 'R t - . Ind- t3( _ Ind LB P R-A Ind. n.l RM GB a R-N Ind - R&D R-V RIII R l P -_` O _ W ` _ !.C►G�F Inc Ind NB a - R-%' R_tl1 P-11 R-II p +:-il CSC ind LB .-R-'' R IIP LE R-1 P - G-11 Ind R-I Rill R I E P R-1 _ R•1I R-tl -c R 'v > SAY R_II i s 2 r p - R-1 R-11 R-1 iN HS R-II R-I P R I R-11 E - rP RI P P R-1 ... R-11 R-II R-II R-111 LB E- NE p_1 R-III CSC/G$/ R-1 =: R I11 R 1 - -+ f R-IU , _ - R-111 R-11 11 J R- f i R-I �,. -� � `� .� •-{�I .� � SRI � :�, _ CSC _ LB R-I f R-I R-I J F R_ p; R-11 jt4„o P.a. i `✓ Ri R-U R-11 `U I `�ROSEM9UNt, 1 P c7 ` ' 74-0 o _ � 1 RSC R _ a O0E LI R - 4 R A GB ROA D L I A ' LI L ! AUUIT offA Y R - I R -4 8 R- 1 A A - _ N B �� R%c. 3 B \ \,G B 4- - ', R- I - A 04 R-I Ll CE INTER - -0 74 IS TRI AL PARK \ L I A R - GOP ��Fj� £AGA A i N�u� �IIlL ' R-3 JP,,F \ A 'Com -4 -► H� sL I// \ L i VE SCOTT PD —� 76- I . -R-4 t Lp�E ARDE N LOTS 166 IT / t\ � s a a 63Q DOUGLAS R. WM VARIANCE FOR GARAGE The hearing regarding the application of Douglas R. Witt, 535 Chapel Lane, for variance for reduced street setback to 14 feet from front lot line for construction of a garage on his residential lot was next convened. There were no objections to the application. He stated that the garage site had been graded 20 years ago and had not been built; further, that substantial excavation and removal of three to five trees would be required if the vari- ance were not granted for the construction of a garage. The neighboring property owner has about the same garage setback and Mr. Witt stated that he would place the garage at the same setback as the next door neighbor. Hall moved, Gits seconded the motion to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Access to the new structure will be provided by the existing driveway off of Chapel Lane. 2. The City will retain all existing drainage and utility easements. 3. All other City ordinances will be complied with. All voted yes. 8 i0 ? L Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 Page Twenty REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WINKLER/JACKSON ADDITION G. Richard Winkler for Rezoning from A to PD Consisting of Approxi- mately 91 Acres and a Preliminary Plat for Winkler/Jackson Addition -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their regular meeting on April 28 19,81. The APC continued the " hearing until the. May 26, 1,981 meeting to allow the City staff to work on traffic studies and other related concerns expressed , ;by the APC. The two applications as submitted by Winkler Develop- ment Company are: 1. A request to rezone approximately 91 acres from t A to PD. The proposed PD wouldinclude commercial on, the north, townhouse and multiple development in the middle and duplex development on the south. 2. The second application is for a preliminary plat entitled Winkl"er/Jackson Addition which is the first phase of the PD which. consists of seven_ commercial lots and ten.'duplex lots The Advisory Planning Commission Is recommending denial of the rezoning and the preliminary plat as presented. A significant amount of support information is available on this item. The City Planner's original report for the April 28, ' 1981 meeting and supple- ment information for the ' May 26, 19.81 meeting is found on, pages 1409� through I V7 Fora copy of the APC action of both APC meetings, please re er'. to copies of those minutes found on pages 1 through Also enclosed' without a page number is a large drawing (1) existing conditions, (2) preliminary plat, (3) land use, and (4) 'circulation. On page j is ' a copy of a letter from Rev. Donald' W. Burns of Mary, o ', er . of the Church. On pages through , is a letter from Jean Zempel addressing the letter rom Mary, of er of 'the Church. On pages through are copies of letters 'which were submitted to the- opposing tTFe- aevelopment. Also enclosed on. pages., through is a: rather lengthy letter from Jean Zempel t. a was writtenng the APC action of May 26, 1981. The j, petition that is referred to as a part of her letter was completed by many residents who reside in that area (approximately 15 pages of names) . This infor- mation has not been reproduced, however, will be available from the City Administrator for inspection at the meeting on Tuesday. If any . member of the City Council` would like to review the list of names, a copy will be provided at your request. Also enclosed on pages S through, is a ,copy" of a latter that was submit- ted by Jean Zempel to: the County Highway Engineer regarding this issue. The last attachment regarding the Winkler/Jackson proposal is a Letter dated May. 28, 1981 from -Richard ,Winkler who is proposing an alternate, 'for consideration by the Glty , Council. A copy of this letter is enclosed. on page4 � 1 + e k 7F4t y al _;Kt r.;Y;', . I � � � ' d d3 g i '< �'r ,7` `^fy i' x �,-' ` � v"� -f -� mo.'s d'ax�r "�y 'r xr� r �, a d'f xn �", trot @ .s c"��T, ! , rte {,� 'k v: � ' �� Agenda Information Memo *'ll- M3 "l `� :�� 1 r " "gay 29, 1981 _ Y;.x.. K, :Pge Twenty-=�r►e1, 11 4, E ` x. t .. { `, Fit:! ACTI(JN 8E' .�S�bfti9D' ZN THE I ,•To appra 4 or deny - the -1 eccxm , �,iQn' o� the APC to deny ,.:t . r ►zt ttr�g I nd preliminary }flat ref-e a�eo�'td I tie 'W*:nkler%,Tacksan°A�i��ti.on..s i r ` J 'x F �. „. �. ^i^ `4 it `P �' s' xi II }f H t i , � . ' x as 'y , :� 11 I � t k�X } r, ". , ,.,.,' =.v __ 1 .y r11, i .` ,� , z - w b b L A F 2`*3 3 ,s I € ' x ) { t ��,, n - X a .a� s v, �.as y0.�4 Sa: I I ` i ' Ye i"' e n`; _ u 44 v -, "v x, . x, `s* O t{ rr m- <-.1 r '� �� " w r c _ 4 h 'r 'S ; , t ? n 'X z §� +�^ r ��� z x ' " 9 -4 S v �r,/ �r� as.- i Z ,bi � `- 1 t & a : 7 � a x Jsv 4. 3 t/, -, ,.g r > v � i . -.,.1 "7 ,s fix .� t '" k a x s n,"#S t 11 � 11, v 7 s': '� - - sx r d 3 e r p��.s e!s .s In ' ,`"a tU. l av � `+Y' �. � R e, '� ! , { r :� 4 f ` �, - T rte $ l t 7'11£h T , 4. #� k d r�. x " � 4 � r n'` > y +*°�s �ti I � "�`e d;'y` �1411 K k,� flf, ''v " x-§ �" Y i s'�'iT � }^'a` £'fit %1,11V}:. 8�y�d' k - � �' '` `: ^F �. t 1. F h 1 LL c „¢ t t x k t Fv "x 7 x 3 f '� ',' ,Y M, k fi R^ t, dry # 4x a f x r. r ws s i � a r a 9 ',t l %1 t .>nSr J r h, �° 1y="�,r11 I �.e 3 * c�y„', ' r F z,�x .� ,i' �. .?- x t11 I 'p'4 . M _++' sw A�aX... ,d _ iEn' Yo- f r"s -f 'z'` .+'P. �+ x ,.e t.; t . fit.`. ? `>'}c.3 S .a�nr,E.i' � x..� t xa N rs �' yy�� '" x a, M' �, �� ' t y `s 1 . x ,, x ', & x as �. �, e 4 ' 6�k � r - sad J x ti - k z TO: JOSEPH HARRISCN, CHAIR IAN, AND THE ADVISORY PLANNING Ca%Tv ISSICN FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: MAY 21, 1981 RE: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE WIN ZR/JACK,SON ADDITION Since the last Advisory Planning Cournission Meeting, there have been some changes to the Winkler/Jackson Addition. The major change is that the Eagan Park Committee has reviewed the proposed Winkler/Jackson Planned Development and has requested that a park dedication and land be dedicated rather than a cash contribution. Since this reccmendaticn, the City staff has met with the subconrdttee of the Park Committee to locate the active park within this neighborhood. The area which the subcommittee directed staff to pursue is an area which is located north of James St. and west of Slater's Road. The parcel contains approximately 4.2 acres which abuts another parcel which contains 3.5 acres which the State Highway Department will be turning back to the City of Eagan. The total acreage in the over- all park will contain approximately 7h acres within this neighborhood. The proposed park is located in an area that will provide a maximum buffer to the existing residents within Slater's Acres. The parkland dedication within this area will also reduce the area Mr. Winkler is proposing for R-4 density. The R-4 parcel would be reduced from 14.6 acres, which could allow approximately 204 dwelling units to 10.4 acres, which would allow approximately 145 dwelling units. The second change which the developer is proposing would consist of re- moving the R-2, or duplex units on the southside of James St. The appli- cant is willing to provide R-1, or single family units, which would be abutting the single family units in Slater's Acres. The neighborhood business and limited business areas of the planned develop- rent have remained the same as well as the proposal for the R-3, or townhouse development. As stated earlier, staff has met with Dakota County to review the access and trip generations as it relates to Cliff Road. Tan Colbert will be addressing the issue of the average daily trips projected from this development. Enclosed is a copy of the original staff report listing the conditions along with a map showing the location of the park and the concept plan showing the spatial relationship as to how the park could develop. If anyone has any questions regarding the Winkler/Jackson Addition, please contact me for additional information. Sincerely, tog Dale C. Runkle City Planner • TO: THE PZANNING CC4AISSION, C/O DAIZ C RUN UX, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A ODLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: V1 _Y 21, 1981 RE: PREF PLAT - �� � ADDITION (RICHAPD �) This proposed preliminary plat has been considered previously by the Plan- ning Can-ni.ssim but was continued due to concerns expressed pertaining to the limited access for this proposed development. The following is addi- tional information that should be considered in the review of this plat. ACCESS Access to this proposed plat will be provided by way of the recently- constructed 44' collector status Slater's Road. This roadway was construc- ted by Mt= to provide access to the Slater's Acres area due to restricted access necessitated by the Cedar Avenue Freeway construction. This access road (Slater's Road) was then upgraded to a collector roadway (44') under a joint cost-participation agreement by the City of Eagan with MnDOT. This was in anticipation of future development of the adjacent properties in order to provide an adequate roadway design capable of handling the pending future traffic volumes generated by this future development. Access for the west half of Section 31 is restricted to Cliff Read and a future extension of Slater's Road through Burnsville in the extreme SW corner of Section 31. Access along the east is restricted by the improvement of the Cedar Avenue Freeway. Access along the west is restricted by the corporate boundary with the City of Burnsville which provides only two access points in the extreme southwest corner. This would be a connection of 125th Street and the future extension of the Burnsville Parkway, which will provide a eontinuaticn' of the southerly extension of Slater's Road. An overall sketch map is attached to this memo for informational purposes. This will then provide the proposed future development of the west half of Secticn 31 with 3 major access points: Cliff Road, 125th Street, and the Burnsville Parkway. These southerly connec- tions will be provided upon development of the property in the southwest quar- ter of Sectio 31, presently ander the control of Hilla Properties. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Traffic volumes for County Road 32 (Cliff Road) are approximately 11,900 vehicles per day with an anticipated increase to 15,000 vehicles per day upon ampleticn of the Cedar Avenue Freeway. The existing capacity of the present roadway section of Cliff Road is approximately 23,000 vehicles per day. Dakota County Highway Department estimates that the traffic volumes for Cliff Road will approximate 30,000 vehicles per day by the year 2000. It is anticipated that at such time, additional improvements to Cliff Road will have to be provided for. At the time of this report, the staff did not have the anticipated traffic volumes generated by the individual phases of the Winkler/Jackson Addition. This information will have to be presented verbally to the Cmrnission at their meeting on May 26, 1981. Ito CITY OF EAGAN PRELLMLN CRY PLAT - WINI=VJACKSON ADDITION MAY 26, 1981 PAGE 1 L10 SIGNALIZATICIN The requirements for signalization at the intersection of Slater's Road and County Road 32 (Cliff Road) are similar to those presented under the Cinnamon Ridge report. It is inevitable that sometime in the future, this intersection will warrant the installation of a traffic signalization system. However, cost participation funding frau State and County agencies will not be made available until warrants are met. At such time as warrants are met, it will then be ca*pared to other intersections pertaining to needs. During the interim period when traffic volumes warrant it to the actual installation of the signalization system, a 4-way stop sign would be installed to handle the cross-traffic movements through this intersecticn. MnDOT has indicated that a future signalization at this intersection would be compatible with the pro- posed pending signal installations on Cliff Road at Nicols Road and both east and west entrance ramps for the Cedar Avenue Freeway. In summary, the staff feels that the recently-improved Slater's Road is of sufficient capacity to handle both the existing Slater's Acres development and the proposed Winkler/Jackson Addition. Future development to the south will require connection to 125th Street and the Burnsville Parkway in the City of Burnsville. I will be available to discuss in further detail these facts at the Planning Commission Meeting of May 26, 1981. Respectfully s,-twitted, C7� Thanas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/Jac ltd s Y >< _ Mt/N• o WC I3ml COUMrttl n[r.Cl. ; T lilt st ct C0 RD to w0 - i l r• A ♦p � p ' AVE OAKLEllf w ' z H YYSi1C aw .- CIA 41b, N m u > : Al1IM DM \� > � �'3 I 270"TAU el 4 = ` } S /�ro - IIENNEIIY L7- 40 c ♦v •• _ • �- IISTw �tl rNo�a r �� �• a I o� \ tb ' 144ij ck 8 / u�Mur r. n MIENS M 0� p ♦ 7:0 p ; p uff, 0 0 a _ _- ' 'M N SLATER$ FtooD PR o - wv m i r x '11 ' C m 00 . „•_� _.• .'A-~ i'�• _ i ,'� a �j/moi• �y_ ',t l.. — �j:`ter — ��--w.� S. . — •+ , � - \. _{'..tom=i. Z"",kt-”"_,. F� /_ =�•t..""����D?`•t•�r �. =� i� i t. V, • _ J ZIP it Ao ' f ''l ' �� •' 't,/• 'I1 Y vim/ \ i flj y. ~ ' • •,/I/ �f ♦ •'` .-fie' � �... � (• , — + .' LOCATICN s.. .•« LAND USE EAGAN, MINN. C> a b win co de ,, . .►id,. • C IG '} �t• ~!. .. f. .fir ""�` •�"� ',,`• •.y"' ,� r• .+.' .' •� .1 fall �! .• �• . t Zo 3 � CITY OF EACAN SUBJECT: BEZCU24G AND PRET. 11ru"RY PLAT ADD--TOP' APPLICANT: RlaiAM WL%1= DOA=P--"EE,r CO- LOCATION: O.LOCATION: PART CF ThT NW- CI' Sx' CN 31 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICUMTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 28, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 22, 1981 REPORTED BY: DALE C. FV=, crry MATER • APPLiCATICN SM111TI m: The first application subr-fitted is a request to rezone approximately 92 acres frcir, A (Acric.ilt=al) to Planned Developrent District. The proposed planned de,.,e om-e-^.t district would include carr�ercial on the north, townhcLse and multiple develcpment in the middle and duplex develcp-ent on the south. The second amlica+ion submitted is a request for prelL-rd ary plat, Winkler/ Jackson Additian which would be the first phase of the pla:nned developr-ert which will consist of 7 comercial lots and 10 duplex lots. 1AND USE Prese-,.tly the entire 92 acres is zoned A (Agricultural) . The Eagan Land Use Cudde :ropcses the s::b ject parcel to be divided into 3 different land use cat cries. There is apercxLmately 15 acres designated as LB (LL ited Business District.) , 23 acres designated as R-4 NUtiple Develop7ent) with a density range cf 12- units per acre and approx., ately 54 acres of R-2 (..Mixed Resider.- tial)writh a density range of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is requesting to rezone the property to a PD (Planned Develop- ment Eist_rict) which would Contain 7.74 acres of neighbc&-ood business, 17.61 acres of linited business for a total of 25.35 ages of acrr'e=ial develop- re-nt. The send category the der.-eloper is requesting is 44.77 acres of R-3 (Residential Towrhouse District) not to exceed 7.26 dwelling Lmits per acre. The third categcry the applicant is reques tl..ng is 14.62 awes +/- of R-4 (Residential K;ltiple) which the density would be dete=.tined in aeccr- dx-nce with the Eagan Zoning Crr'.inanee, and lastly, a parcel which will con- tain 1.95 acres of R-2 (P.esidential Duplex) which would contain 5 duplex bud1di.-ics, or 13 duplex chits. The prcposed request is a deviation from the propcsed land use guide. However, the developer believes that with the topog=-a,!^dc restraints of the property and the location of the property to Cliff Poad and Cedar Avenue, that the proposed develop-ta-rit sche7.e which las been s�br ratted is feasible and good uses proposed for the site. C_= F „j F_r NI--G _ PRS'' �'.I`Z�%RY PLAT - w 1,K_7PV.'AZ-.SON AMI;ICN APPIL 28, 1981 PAM n-JO At t� present tire, the applicant does riot have detailed plans '`or exactly has �.is area will be developed. He is hoping that he can recea..,e par-m--eters th-rough the PD (Plan-,ed De,, -ent) process, and once the parer, �t_ers and land uses have been designated, then detailed planning for each of t: parcels will then go through the detailed planning and platting phases for aF, ;h phase of deve 1 cp7vemt. According to Ordinance 52.07, Subdivision 6, the subrrissiors for preli.±nary appra:al for a planned develogrent include, 1) a sketch plan, 2) staging pian, 3) park and pedestrian circulation plan, 4) land use plan. When these exh hits ha,.-e been arc pec?, the dL-.,e leper will then start the detailed pla zu-ng and platting accLr�'d ng to the second phase of the planned develogrent process. The s,.,�,'-ject parcel is swat of an isolated parcel in the City of Eacan. The parcel is located south of Cliff Road, west of new Cedar A enuv alicment,and east of the Facan/B,rsviLe boundary line. The area to the south is rela- tively u-nde,.,e sped at this time. The only developsint in Eagan is apprcxi- rately 16 hares in the Slater's Acres develog-ent. The reason the applicant is re7aestinc to develop the proper-.y at this ti^.ie is that with the crstr..- tion of new Ce,ar Avenue, the access to existing Slater's Acres had been se,.e.--ed. A joint project betwv---n the City of Eagan and the 'y-mesota Depart- rent cf Trarspertation, Slater's Road was const_rlcted the-ouch this undeveloped property to provide access to Slater's Acres. The road which has been con- str--==_ed is a 44' collector street with an 80' right-of--w-my. Since the road has been eons=_;cted, ass-ss:-mts for the road have been levied against un- de=.,el=ped N.r. Winkler has suh i tt._ed a letter rega.r-_. ing-the assess- ren is for this road whrich he will have to begin paying. In addition to the av=lication to rezone to planned develog-e_nt, the appli- cant has also shitted a preli:ira-ry plat for the first phase of de-.•elogent. Unlike other planned 6--,elog-vants, the applicant is proprsinc to develop the a3-rercial portion of the planned develog-ient in +tNe first phase of develop- m-an.t rather than ha%-Lng the ccrrie_rcial be in the Last phase of the develop- t:>ent. The prel.,L-inar, plat will consist of approximately 27.3 acres and ccr.tai:n 7 ecrrercial lots and 10 d•,:plex lots. The corre-rcial lots are proposed to ha.,e direct access to Slater's Fbad. The 10 d,-,plea lets proposed are prese-ntly restricted in the depth beca,rse'Of the existi-ng read wtdch has been corstr.:c`..ed to provide access to Slater's Aces. However, t'-.e d..Tlex lots shall contain 15,000 n_;a_-e feet, or 7,500 sc,.;a-re feet per unit. X16 C:.''`! CF E.a.N REZCN:!)G hZ PP=`. %A',d PLAT - WI:QQJE:{JJACTZW ADDITION APP=, 28, 1981 PXZ TIT= At the present time, the developer does not have e.-cact plans for the aT;rier- cial area. Therefore, building plans, or site plans for the carriercial area are not available at this time. CFV=--, P.RFA As mentioned above, the subject parcel is scr-ewtat isolated in the City of Eagan. There has been an access road oorstructed in the property off of Cliff Fuad. This is the only access to the property at this tine. All of the streets in the City of Bun-L-rille have been cul-de-saced, or looped, so there will be no access fran the west frau the City of Burrsville. In the future, the access road which has been Borst-uc'ad will tie in to the City of B< r-.srille. This access road has been ter.dnated just south of the sub- ject parcel. In the future, this road will continue and loop into the City of Burns•ri lle. However, the exact location has nct been dete_^.-ined at this time. Bcth Eagan and Burnsville show this connection in their Ca-prehersive Plans. Anther factcr regarding this site is that there is ;such topog.-aphic relief thraughout this property. There is also an abundance of vegetation and trees thrvughcut this entire area. The applicant is requesting the pla.-:ned develcp- rie.^t proposal for this parcel in order to clyster buildings a-ed de--cities in areas w ugh can be developed and save as neny of the amenity features which are the trees and vegetation, and disturb as little of the topography as pcssitle. If approved, the planned deveicpnent should be subject to the fcllcw- ing condi t ic.-s: 1. A plarned de,:e1cp-ient ag ^t shall be drafted and executed betAoeen the City of Eacan arO the developer prier to the constrsctd-on of any phase Of the pia^ned de:•eloprent. 2. The plarned develcp-ent shall be subject to Minnesota Jepar ^t Of Tra^--,-cr--a*son and iako+,a County Plat Co r ission's review and ca ments. 3. The plarned develop-8nt shall be li-nited to a 5-year tine period. 4. The park dedication require-ent for the residential area shall be deter- rr-ned bry the reoxrerdaticcs of the Eaca-i Advisory Park Ca-rattee. 5. An architectural design shall be established for the commercial area, and all of the arriercial buildings shall follow this architect•.:ral there. DCFV j ac NC R.wn...''Ez�IO?IS - 4v�`: ✓J?� I ALD" 1. Sufficient richt-of-way r .1st be dedicated adjacent to Cliff Road pro- viding for a 75' half right-of-way. 2. A ponding and drainage ease-ent must be dedicated to incorporate the 924.0 ele-.ation around Pond AP-10. 3. Standard 10' drainage and utility ease Man`s must be dedicated adjacent to all public right-of-way. 4. I ej_; tiGraZ drainage and utility easements for Slater's Fuad storrl sewer and Pond AP-10 lift station force main outlet rust be dedicated at the tine of final plat. 5. An 8' bitumLrous trailw-ay must be const-ructed along the south side of Cliff Road to the Ceda.- Avenue Bridge. 6. A 6' trail/sidewalk must be constructed along the east side of Slater's R*ad. 7. Additional trunk stogy sewer assess-en`s -mist be paid or levied at the ti-e- of rezoning approval to provide for the difference in assessment rates frau R-1 (Residential) to Multiple and/or Carriercial- TAC/jac TO: 7141E ADVISCRY P:A-N SING COrMISSION, C/O DALE C. TV.=, CITY PLA�T;2 FPI.I4: TIMAS A. COLBERT, DIRE=R OF PCBLIC WORKS DA.z,: APRIL 23, 1981 RE: P?�*.�,L`M.7iRY PLAT - WL`.M /.' RSQN ADDI'^ZON (RiGuARD jqI:i=) The P"-` lic Works Depart-,Pnt has the following iters to be considered during the review of the proposed prelizr xo y plat: UTi ES Water-ain of sufficient capacity and pressure has been installed along the west side of Slater's Road Lmder Project 275 during 1930. Sarna^y sewer of sufficient size and depth to handle this proposed de%,elcg-ient has been installed aicng Janes St. to the intersection with Slater's Road Lnderr Project 275 during 1980. This sanitary sewer will ha%N-- to be extended to provide lateral service as a part of the developrent of this plat. S"TRn�S Slater's Read and James Street have been ocnstru&ted ,by Nt,.DG'T during 1980 to City-app=ed standards providing access to this proposed plat. GPPD^;G M CPA2AGv This proposed plat incorporates sone se,--P—re tcpoc raphy and heavily-wooded land. With the i..-Prove-gent of Slater's Read by MrDOT during 1980, adeq.;ate storm sewer facilities were installed which disdiarged to pending areas adjacent to Siate_r's Road. Centin ration of this dr3irace to the .:ajcr pond (AP-10) located cn the ;rest side of Slater's Road will rage to be proviiei for the develCprert of this plat. This major pond (AP-10) is a part- of t:',e .:aster stor. . water system for the City of Eagan with a proposed ncr- mal ele•.at_im of 919.7, and an estimted high waterJe'_e%-ation cf 924.0. This pend presently cis not hmme a positive stcrm se.4--r outlet. It will reYaire the stalla*ion of a lift station which will disez--,,e to the `lx= pond located in the southeast corner of this plat and through the State right----1--ay draira7e system installed as a part of the new Ce--1ar Aven,.: FreewaY. i'his lift station installation will be the respcnsi.:;.lity of the City izsder the majcr trunk store sewer fund. Adeq%ia`e and sufficient richt-of-way for James Street and Slater's Road has be-ena�sired by Ntr=. If necessary, additional right-of-way will have to be dedicated adjacent to Cliff Finad to provide for a rars.-mm 75' half right-,f-«ay. Stmdard drainage and utility easements adjacent to all p,-blic right-of-way will be required. Drairace'pcnding ease-ents inporporati.ng the 924.4 ele nation will have to be dedicated for Pc-, d AP-10 cn the west side of Slatel--'s Road. All other irterral draira,e a-x3 utility easements .requited for the exte-sicn of Slater's Rrad drainage and/or the proposed future lift station force main outlet will be required with the final plat. PD-i T_�^? ;i-.�y PLAT - WL'�.-V.-ACKSW ADDITION - LNGL,�a�jG FE20RT Pte, 740 SITE PT M The developer has been cooperative in elirirati.ng 2 cul-de-sacs fran heir initial proposal in the sout•west cc-rner cf this plat. However, due to the topcc-raphy of the property, the proposed cul-de-sac on tie west side of Pond AP-11 is necessitated due to the topography and tree cover. An 8' bit:z-d-ncus wal:lcaay rn:st be constructed along the south side of Cliff Read p=,riding pedestrian: access to the sidewalk on Cliff Rccad Bridce over Cedar A%enue Freeway. In addition, a 6' side al.k/trailway should be constructed along the east side of Slater's Road. This props=ed plat was assessed for trunk storm sewer area under Project 186 at a res4 deznt4al rate. With t'Ze proposed rezoning to rultiple and c rr :ial zoning, this will result in a.-1 additional $35,669.36 in trzk stsewer assessne^ts wthich will be req.:ired to be paid or assessed at cr.-•, the t:L-ve of rezonii:g approval (25.35 acres oxm rcial, 61.34 acres multi- ple) . All other trunk area assess:-tents for utilities and collector streets :lave bee.* assessed previously. I will be a•,-ailable to ans,aer any crues*io::s pertaining to this plat at the Pla:.-dng Comission Meeting of April 28, 1981. Respect--,—'ly s::b-fitted, Tha-as n. Cc'_bert, P.E. Director of P•-clic Woonks TrC/j ac 2 • - Na Z-71-A l inkler Development Co. Winkler Development Co. 14801 GLAZIER AVENUE.APPLE VALLEY.MN 55124.6121 432.7101 April 15, 1981 Planning Commission Members and City Staff: I have requested that Mr. Runkle attach this letter to my plans in order to give you some background on the subject property. Slater's Road was built jointly by the State Highway Department and the City of Eagan to serve the people living in Slater's Acres when they had their access to Cedar Avenue cut off. This 44 foot collector street was constructed through my (subject) property to get to Slater's Acres. My (subject) property has been assessed for these improvements which were installed in 1980. The assessment on the property totals $377,321. 30. The real estate taxes payable in 1981 are $70,108. 66, of which $60,669.19 represents this years special assessments. The sanitary sewer still must be installed in Slater's Road and this will create more special assessments. With these kinds of specials levied and interest running, it becomes very important to have the property developed. We have very carefully taken into consideration the following characteristics cf the property to arrive at our land uses: 1. Existing proximity to Cedar Freeway and Cliff Road. 2. Existing aligry ent of Slater's Road. 3. Existing cYen areas, the heavily treed areas and the topography. 4. Ex_sting pend and the natural slope barriers created by it for different land uses. S. Exis ung church and four acres of blacktop abutting the property on the west. 6. With all these existing featares to theland, we feel it is a cne of kind piece of property and difficult to compare to other developments. We lock forward to our meeting with the planning commission and hope that together we can designate land uses and densities so the property can be developed soon. Thane you. Sero ''; /�, /! 'Ricnard W. '2 kler KaW jk j�► Ird + a RSV .. .» - R&D a ' F11 • -- — •_ _ -i- •'-. IndLH • // •,ice y R-il P L i'i-11- - • - - r• _ -ar a• t — ® R Fhb Y0 two _I �• R•1 R-HI - C" P E r' V R-;1 41 -i �9 L3 = R-i } R J R-1 R4 T�r m Z R_I R-1 R-11 P T R41.0f RAI , R41 �P ,': +. 1 - r� i• � OL Ilk i•• !'1 ax_E aL._e IL 06, 7irl Joe rnc + , x:x•� t 'C .'r_ , ,''t. a •. � � r ����j'/ ♦ (..` �7 �, .•� �i1 r 1 a1 r � _` KE`! LOCATION s. :. � � _. ;EXISTING CONDITIONS el- G fii_ e o 127. SLS t w 1 EAGAN MANN y d m 1 i �..,.ir .x— f "_-� '�;_T t!r �� �7•t ;• i•_;-� a //�� �-. ,� '�-, 41 Pct-D ..•�T �-'��. %� � i�.�11 �'r`•�." �`�.''�"`�L (•. /f�`• � � '�`j �ftp♦- ,� If A 1 INA .� i -_ ice.+�� =►:—+-�- -..,y�S; � � \•,�.,�, ';� i !, �—.I �% � -.c � sem. �_ � � `��-_ ���� •• "`�/� .r 155 2^ ` l iXt - - =Ari. �/, /�',%. ;•`\��.1� r' �_;%- .A 11. ..i i :i ./h. LOCATION c. ..b..•« ,a LAND USE .•' � 1 � / � �tx� U � � LTi fi�1 EAGAN. AAINN. --- ,I�,� � ' '_��i�C ESS � •� 1 `.`-�t "'�� �, !. v - - -• r. 1 -' �.• �• � �;'- 4=`.�^_ _-ti:` r •s�:'.S ��, "'moi/ .- � t.`�� °�. R _ _ .�-x•• -t- •, 3t { ,. .r i x'60 MA, S 1 _ 4z 7 .e •-' i - t � ��-.-w'.:-_ � .moi.. S v.,� , l J Il { i ,�,.• / � `- � i�` �• \.�\ r - _ 1.� Tri �. jr - at LOCATION.-: Ba,4, CIRCULATION o QL71�11 N, mm. O � x n,,� � .i".- �., .H�lr� � i�, ; If _ .,'i �',. ; � I /1• '�\� is �� j. � i.�. \ ••, � - .11 I I. � �/ � � i'i � ' `\•/ Imo. , . .► .. a ,��..`� �� _ - :•jam• + �� of It ��.. ice.-...! - •.�� ♦ _ � ..t Y.t� `\``�/ �J // �`��-,• r' Pis 43 i-), p t �_ 5T a _ s i W � i`~'S Y� �y,• � `t !-�_�_.-� /`'! ��, •' � J ice- .. J'E� 1 LOCATION s.. ......•.. PRELIMINARY PIAT w �X�:^:� 'moi f� '�� - •�.' �y'^� � •C � `/'�\, �•-��� �1� � r Y�=i�..0 'r �try . � `��� �J' • tiS � .. a C`�`,., EAGAN, IWIM. • - '. � _ �' '_ — . . . _ ..ate _ fir• -,�— �t 1 ` � � =`• ! PF VARI ��`.t : :�i-- -4 �JJ CSC 4t�••�-` R - 2 w�°- .�� Fig V�t C S C �" �Yam � `. `L`` ..w`�'• LLJ RivER RB 7Esr to - L8 'f Z } a to SLA W- - A IS A AA i ESts 'E5 `t %Z7► R- IA R-IC P Q APPLE 7 V APC Minutes April 28, 1981 way for I-35E and that the lot requiring lot width variance would include a rroposed motel. There were strong concerns about whether there would be adequate setbacks and parking to comply with City ordinances and Public Works Director Colbert recommended a concept be shown that would fit onto the pro- posed motel site. He stated that the restaurant site and the parking for the 6th Addition had not met certain ordinance requirements. Mr. Bartholdi stated that certain buildings were proposed to be constructed during 1981, and that an agreement with MN/DOT as to right-of-way limits had now been received. It was recommended the grading drain toward Washington Drive. Gits moved, Wilkins seconded a motion to continue the hearing until the next regular meeting for additional planning to make certain the proposals will comply with the City ordinances. All voted in favor. ,f�QWI /JACNSON ADDITION — REZONING AND �PRELIDMU=IXN"YPLJ&T The public hearing next convened by the Chairman included the applica- tions of Richard Winkler Development Company to rezone approximately 92 acres from A, Agricultural to Planned Development District and preliminary plat approval of Winkler/Jackson Addition which would include the first phase of the Planned Development consisting of seven commercial lots and 10 duplex lots. Mr. Mike Gare and Mr. Winkler were present for the applicant. The area would include several ponds to be dedicated; the buffer along the west line of the property would provide for 100-foot setback. A large group of area resi- dents were present. Mr. Gare discussed the soils, the slopes, the water conditions including ponding, the phasing, the comprehensive plan proposal, and noise levels. He stated that the northerly portion of the property was requested for commercial type development because of the potential noise problem. He further stated that the LB east of the frontage road would be included as phase I and that there is some interest in developing commercial in that location. He displayed a series of slides of the site including the proposed green space buffers. He further stated that residential developent has not been totally planned and only densities are being requested for approval at the present time. The R-3 zoning area would include six unit per acre maximum. Mr. Fred Drexler, representing Slater's Acres residents, appeared and read a statement in opposition to rezoning and the preliminary plat. A petition was submitted but he stated that only 10 days had been given to review the proposal. It was recommended that park area be approved by the Council, that the Comprehensive Plan generally be followed, and recommended that the R-2 adjacent to Slater's Acres be revised to R-1 use. He suggested that the R-u area be utilized as park and further objected to the sequence of the commercial commencing prior to the residential construction. Objections were raised as to density, increased traffic and safety hazards, and excessive amount of commercially zoned property in Eagan already. Mr. Winkler stated the LB zoning would include office buildings. Planning Commission Members recommended that the LB district on the east side of the road be converted to residential. A letter from Father Burns of Mary, Mother of the Church was also presented. Bob Ebele, the vice-president of River Wood Homeowners Asso- ciation was present and expressed concerns about the R-3 uses along the Burnsville border and recommended a reduction in density. The River Woods townhouse area has four units per acre according to Mr. Ebele and he also stated concerns about the type of 100-foot buffering along the Burnsville border. Traffic on local streets and Cliff Road, the impact on schools and 5 APC Minutes April 28, 1981 noise increases all pointed to a need for new study according to Mr. Ebele. Mr. Colbert stated that it was uncertain as to when Slater's Road would be extended south but that it would connect to development in Burnsville. Mr. Hilla, the owner of the undeveloped property along the Burnsville line was present. John Voss, the City Consulting Planner, estimated that about 45% of capacity of Slater's Road would be utilized by this proposed development. There were questions about the numbers of signals on Cliff Road including the exit and entrance ramps, Nicols Road, and Slater's Road. Member Wilkins stated that she would favor additional park land in the area. The developer proposed open space to be owned by the homeowners in the R-3 and R-4 areas. .Chairman Harrison stated that he had serious concerns about traffic problems in the development, densities as proposed, that he opposed commercial in the area and recommended further study for the northerly portions of the parcel and further that there were very few accesses from the general area because of the lack of access directly into Burnsville except for one access southerly into Burnsville. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the application indefinitely for further study and review and that a traffic engineering study be prepared for the site. All members voted in favor. BICENTENNIAL 7TH ADDITION -- FEDERAL LAND COMPANY Mr. Bartholde and Mr. Vernon Colon again appeared on behalf of the Federal Land Company regarding the hearing on the application for preliminary plat and variance. Mr. Bartholde requested the reconvening of the hearing and the Planning' Commission did reconvene the hearing. The applicant requested that Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1 be designated Outlots and that the preliminary plat be amended to provide that Lots 1, Block 2, and Lot 1, Block 1, be considered for approval with the balance of the lots consisting of outlots. It was noted the hearing on Industrial Revenue financing for the proposed building required platting by the City. Outlot A would be acquired by MN/DOT for right-of-way area. After discussion, Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded a motion to recommend approval of the amended preliminary plat of Bicentennial 7th Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. Bicentennial 7th Addition shall be subject to the MN/DOT's review and comment, because the proposed addition abuts State rights-of-way. 2. The City shall review each detailed site plan for each of the build- ings to make sure lot coverage, parking requirements and green space is pro- vided for each lot. 3. No buildings shall be constructed prior to the approval of the final plat for Bicentennial 7th Addition, 4. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans shall be sub- mitted and approved by the City prior to the approval of the final plat. 5. Five foot concrete sidewalks shall be installed along the south and east sides of Washington Drive with the development of each "lot or June 15, 1983, whichever occurs first. 6. Standard drainage and utility easements, sha 11 be dedicated adjacent 4_1 eA 6 APC Minutes May 26, 1981 WINK.ER JACKSON ADDITION REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The Chairman then convened the public hearing regarding the application of Richard Winkler Development Co. for rezoning of approximately 92 acres from Agricultural to Planned Development District and for preliminary plat approval of Winkler Jackson Addition consisting of the first phase of the proposed Planned Development which would consist of seven commercial lots and ten duplex lots. Mr. Winkler and his planner were present and noted that there :had been several meetings with County, State, and City staff regarding the .concerns of the City and neighboring residents since the last appearance before the Planning Commission. Changes included 4.8 acres proposed park land dedication in addition to 3.5 acres which would be dedicated by MN/DOT to the City adjacent to Trunk Highway x`77. Also, it was proposed to revise the j parcel on the south side of James Street adjacent to Slater's Acres from R-2 to R-1 use. The planner reviewed the drawings with current plans and noted there would be about six or seven single family lots in the area south of James Street. A number of neighboring property owners were present who objected to the application. James Schmidt of Slater's Acres submitted a petition with 181 signatures opposing the project and expressed numerous concerns including potential problems with increased traffic onto Cliff Road, the lack of signal- ization for a considerable period of time, the additional burden on Cliff Road, the fact that commercial development is not needed in the area, and suggested that the proposed development appears to be too dense. He recom- mended a semaphore at Slater's Road but because of other proposed semaphores it would only add to the congestion on Cliff Road in the future. He was also concerned about the single access out of the development at the present time and opposed commercially zoned land facing Slater's Road. Bob Ebeley of the Riverwoods Homeowner's Association stated a number of concerns of that group including objection to R-3 zoning on the west and recommended R-1 use; he favored some of the changes that had been made since the first plan including the proposed park dedication, he recommended a lower general density, and had questions about the development including the meaning of the 100-foot buffer along the Burnsville border. He objected to the fact there would be only one access to the north and there is no time table for the access points to the south. Mr. Fred Drexler from Slater's Acres also objected to density as did a representative from the Riverwoods Townhouse Association. Member Gits was concerned about acquiring the two access points into Burnsville to the south and suggested a formal agreement or understanding with the City of Burnsville regarding the location and timing for those access points. It was noted that both accesses are shown on the Comprehensive Plans of Eagan and Burnsville. Mr. Winkler stated that there would possibly be a five-year development stage for the entire proposal. Mr. Vraa was present and stated that the configuration of the park followed the topography on the north and stated that the Park and Recreation Committee recommended ,approval of the park dedication for the development if the development,proceeds. Member Hall reviewed the Comprehensive Guide proposal for the area and it was noted that there would be 44 acres of R-3 land less road oil"tour aeres with 200 units at between five to six units per acre. The 1-4 area would consist of 10 acres 130 x APC Minutes May 26, 1981 with 12-14 units per acre'and 130 units with a total of approximately 330 units proposed on about 50 acres with a 6.6 unit per acre average. Mr. Hall and Mr. Turnham were both concerned about the commercial development on the west of Slater's Road not being in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and recommended against commercial use in that location. After continued discus- sion at 10:50 p.m., the Chairman announced the hearing closed and moved to recommend denial of the applications for rezoning and for preliminary plat for the reasons that are outlined above including objections from neighboring property owners and the following: 1. There is inadequate planning to provide for the development of the property including access, traffic volume, land utilization, etc. 2. There is an excess of commercial land proposed in the development in that there is substantial amount of commercial zoning in the general area of the City. 3. There is inadequate access to the property from Slater's Road at the present time with the only access at Cliff Road. 4. The volume of traffic on Cliff Road is becoming excessive in light of the fact that there will not be sufficient signalization on Cliff Road at the intersections. 5. Thsre is no time table for the development of the property to the south or the accesses into Burnsville at 125th Street and Burnsville Parkway to relieve the potential congestion of traffic from the proposed Winkler development. 6. The area west of Slater's Road is designated residential on the Comprehensive Planning Guide and additional commercial in that location is not feasible or desirable. 7. The density of the entire development appears to be too great in light of uses to the south and the west and also based upon the physical terrain characteristics of the property. r Those in favor of the motion were Harrison, Turnham, Wilkins, and Bohne. Against were Gits and Hall, both of whom did not oppose the motion so much as favoring more study and a continuance of the public hearings. It was noted the application will be considered by the City Council on June 2, 1981. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion duly made and seconded, the meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m. PHH t 10, ' Me CAawh 11712 Cartier Avenue Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 Phone: 890-1440 April 24, 1981 Eagan Planning Commission and City Council 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Members of Commission and Ccuncil: On Monday, April 20th, Mr. Richard Winkler presented the plans of his proposed addition on the Eastside of our church property. Members of our parish council and myself locked over the plans carefully and asked many questions. For the past two years I have been concerned about the young people who have driven through our property back into the woods where he proposes to build. Within the last week I walked some distance in this area. Part of it locks like a dump with old cushions and wheels from cars, broken down chairs and just plain garbage thrown back in the area where these cars are driven. The Eagan police department has broken up drinking parties that have been held back there. With the buffer zone that will be left between our property and his small business section we are very pleased. I understand that he will leave 100 feet of trees along the area backing up to the River Woods Homes. This should preserve the integrity of their homes. The members of our parish council who were present and I were pleased with this proposal. Thanking you, I remain ,;Sin .ce ly yours ) Donald W. Burns DWB/km 13Z � � May 4, 1981 Paul Hauge, City Attorney Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Hauge: With regard to the April 28 meeting, 7:00 p.m. , City Hall, Winkler Development vs. Slaters Acres (so to speak) NW-4 Section 31 - a letter was turned in from Mary Mother Church regarding their concern for beer parties in this area, etc. , which I had the pleasure to read. Enclosed please find a letter from Jay M. Berthe, Assistant Chief of Police, Eagan Police Department regarding law enforcement on Slater's Road the past six months. The letter Mr. Winkler so nicely handed to the Planning Committee and we were able to read is what really hurt. I have requested a copy of the Mary Mother letter but they have not been so kind as to forward one to my attention so that I could send it along once again to you. (That's what probably provoked me to pop out of my seat without addressing the board chairperson, to make a comment, when I knew better. I really love and respect my neighborhood and plan to defend it just to this extent of peacefulness.) Please see the chairperson and other board members receive a copy for their records. I think it is a fine compliment to Slaters Road and not to be overlooked by any means. Thanking you in advance for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Jan Zempe 2245 James Court Eagan, MN 55122 Home: 454-4835 Work: 681-5189 C*an Vatire n eartrtnt c- Martin DesLauriers f z 3830 Pilot Knob Road Chief of Police . Eagan, Minnesota 55122 !ay M. Berthe •�P Assistant Chief of Police �` ���-�' � - 1 May 1981 Mrs . Richard Zempel 2245 James Court Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mrs . Zempel : Per your request , I have checked our files for the past six months in regard to beer parties being held along Slater's Road and also in the area known as Slater's Acres . I checked our files under the classification of "Liquor Laws" , which would include liquor violations but not moving liquor violations such as Driving Under the Influence, Open Bottle, etc. We had zero incidents at the above locations . I also checked our files under "Disturbing the Peace", which would cover calls from citizens about a noisy group or party situation, and, again, the total number of incidents was zero. If I can be of any further assistance please feel free to call at 454-3900 . Very truly yours , N POLICE DE AR�TMENT ay Berthe ssis- ant Chief of Police JMB/vk _ THE LONE OAK TREE — THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH & GROWTH INOUR TV ROBERT P. SANDEEN, P.E. DAKOTA `� K O T:� COUNTY COUNTY ENGINEER ,._ TEIEPHONE- ;DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 612.437.0396 1560 HWY. 55-HASTINGS. MINNESOTA 55033 6T. PAUL Mvla. • A w•nN0 DAKOTA OYNTT May 1 , 1981 Ms . Jean Zempel 2245 James Court Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Ms. Zempel : x As you requested in your telephone conversation with Mr. Bob Sandeen on 4-30-81 the following data is provided for your information. 1980 Average Daily Traffic on County State Aid Highway 32 from Minnesota Trunk Highway 13 to Kennelly Road = 14,600 vehicles. 1980 Average Daily Traffic on County State Aid Highway 32 from Kennelly Road to County State Aid Highway 23 = 11 ,900 vehicles. Dakota County anticipates the demand on this road will exceed 30,000 vehicles per day by the year 2000. We estimate the vehicle capacity of a four lane undivided roadway without turn lanes to be 23,000 vehicles per day. Sincerely, * Peter L. Sorenson Traffic Engineer PLS:ar AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Mr. and Mrs. James B. Schmitt 2270 James Court Eagan, Minnesota April 28, 1981 Eagan Planning Board City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Gentlemen: Unfortunately, because of prior commitments, we can not attend the hearing concerning proposed development of the Cedar/Cliff Road area . None the less , we would like to express our strong support of the concensus proposal presented by Mr. Fred Drexler on behalf of the Slater's Acres Residence. We believe that the rezoning required by the Winkler/Jackson plan is totally inappropriate and in contrast to the existing residential area . While the rezoning proposed by the City of Eagan still fails to address all the needs of our immediate community, it much more realistically reflects our present environmental concerns. We remain hopeful that the Eagan Planning Commission will recognize the environmental impact and the drastic changes which would occur by proceeding wit, he Winkler/Jackson plan. _ Respect f y mitted, James chmitt �f Barbara C. Schmitt .r We. the undersigned, are unable to attend the meeting scheduled for tonight at the Eagan City Hall in connection with a proposed development known as the "Winkler Development Plan". However, since we cannot be in attendance at this meeting, we are informing you that we are behind our spokesperson, Mr. Fred Drexler, 1001. That is, we oppose any development of this type in Slater's Acres. 6eti�,4 Foster 3. Wakefield Barbara J. Wa a ie 2240 James Court Eagan. YN 55122 (454_2104) TA DATM: This day of April, 1961. ✓ �r fi Townhouse Villages at River Woods Homeowners Association May 26, 1981 Mayor Bea Blomquist and The City of Eagan Planning Committee Eagan City Hall Eagan, Minnesota Gentlemen and Mayor Blomquist: We would like to begin by stating we feel proper notification was not given to our residents. Only those homes bordering the proposed development area were notified. No notification was given to the other residents of the Association nor to our Association Office. All of the property in The Villages at River Woods is common property, not privately-owned, and as such all residents should have been informed. We, the Board of Directors of The Villages at River Woods , on behalf of the residents of its 324 townhomes, wish to add our support to that of the concerned residents of South River Hills, East River Hills, Rings Drive, River Woods Homes and Slaters Acres who oppose the high density rezoning and development of the NW 1/4 of Section 31. We feel the proposed development of this area will be detri- mental to property values of the surrounding area and will not preserve the natural beauty of the area or the wildlife environment. The proposed Winkler-Jackson development offers no provision for park or play facilities which we feel would be needed to accommodate the influx of new families. Tot lots are not sufficient, nor are they a realistic solution. { 334 River Woods Lane, Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 • Phone 612/894-4368 Page Two May 26, 1981 Mayor Bea Blomquist and The City of Eagan Planning Committee Another major concern we have is that with the development of this area as proposed, the traffic conditions on Cliff Road would soon become extremely congested. Prior to the installation of a semiphore at Cliff Road and River Hills Drive, access to Cliff Road was often difficult and frequently : dangerous. At present, during peak hours, traffic backs up substantially. To consider a development proposal which would ultimately, undoubtedly, double this amount of traffic, would not be in the best interests of the areas residents. Statements have been made as to the proposed cost of units to be built and a 100 foot buffer zone along our boundry. However, we feel once this area has been rezoned, we have no guarantee these assurances will be carried out. We are in direct opposition to the Winkler-Jackson high density rezoning request as presented and feel further work is needed prior to granting this request. Sincerely, he Board �4_�i_rec rs for E I L GE RI WO D TOWNH MES S OCIATION / t464,41 Townhouse Villages at River Woods Homeowners Association $ 9 f May 27, 1981 4F1'Frl�F'� co SAY 28 X81 Mayor Bea Blomquist Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road 2 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Mayor Blomquist : To address myself , I am Jean Zempel and am representing the concerned Residents of Slaters Acres and surrounding area with reference to the Winkler-Jackson proposed rezoning of NWk of Section 31 to high density development . (A petition of opposition, containing 184 signatures to date, was presented to the planning committee at the May 26 meeting . ) We have attended many meetings regarding this high density rezoning proposal, all in opposition to the excessive emphasis on profit the Winkler-Jackson proposal is displaying by their Phase I development of commercial areas . This would devaluate the existing property and cause a drop in any further high-quality residential development . To date there are many neighborhood businesses already established in and around the area, that adequately accomodate Slaters Acres and the surrounding residents . In Cedarvale , and Sioux Trail , we have empty stores now due to lack of business . Logically speaking , we cannot see any reason for more commercial development when this problem already exists in our area. As to professional medical buildings , we have on the north side of Cliff and Cedar a new center just for that purpose being built now. Adding to this, the high density rezoning proposal of R3 and R4 is virtually nextdoor to the established single-family homes with no adequate buffer zones inbetween. On 92 acres of land (give and take the area now covered by existing ponds and the dead end Slaters Road) would be the addition of upwards of 2, 000 plus people. Referencing the dead end Slaters Road possibility of connecting up with the Burnsville Crosstown (which is the way they are proposing to handle this high density) in speaking with the Burnsville City Engineer , Chuck Sigrud yesterday, there is no timetable for the possible connection of these two roads . He said , "it strictly depends upon the development of the land, and with the existing problems of the single family market today, etc . , unless the market breaks , without development there would be no reason for Burnsville to stuff the road back in there" . He also stated, "by the fall of 1982 , the Burnsville Crosstown might exist as far east in Burnsville as Villa Du Park. But even that is just probability . There are two other pieces of land beyond this on the Burnsville side that would have to be developed, one owned by Fischer of Fischer Const and one owned by John Girard. . Neither are proposed for development at this time" . , ' r 140 - continued - r Mayor Bea Blomquist - 2 - May 27, 1981 On the Eagan side we have Jack Hilla as the property owner in the Southwestern part of Section 31, with no proposed development at this time which he personally stated to the planning committee at the May 26 meeting. That in itself , no timetable, no planned development , nothing in writing from Burnsville regarding such, puts any connection of the Burnsville Crosstown and Slaters Road years ahead . That would leave us with high density development of the NW-4 of Section 31 and one dead end road, originally planned as an artery road, to accomodate this area. With that in mind I contacted the Minnesota Department of Public Safety Fire Marshall' s Office and spoke with one of their code specialists . He suggested an appeal to the planning commission to punch an access road into this section as our only road in has been cut off . In speaking to Doug Reed, of our own local Eagan Fire Department , he stated they don' t like dead end roads because of the probability of storms , fires , the like, and they cannot get in to get the people out ! The proposed high density rezoning would magnify these complications and therefore accelerate the consideration for denying this type of rezoning due to public safety. I attended the Zachman Dev of Section 30 hearing, May 26 , prior to the Winkler-Jackson hearing. If the Zachman Dev is to date legally zoned R2 and R4, and the developer is allowed to develop up to a certain density (as the Dale Runkle report stated in the Zachman packet , page 3) because of this legality and/or city ordinance , and as the builder cannot be forced to build fewer houses then the property was legally zoned for, as the city would then have to pay damages to the developer, I can see a definite preventative measure forming with regard to the NW4 of Section 31 . That preventative measure being , the foresight we are given to such problems as this caused by high density rezoning, which locks the city into these steps legally, which produces the apparent need to change and hold down the zoning to R1 and R2 within the NW4 of Section 31 . We also have the additional foresight of further saturation of Cliff Road . We are at present agriculturally zoned, which is open zoning, and only Rl single family homes are established in this section now. (A section which is land- locked on all sides with the only outlet being a single dead end road . ) A main consideration is the 3700 cars estimated in the Zachman Dev and the 4700 cars estimated by the Winkler-Jackson Dev on Slaters Road, which when added together could put 9, 000 more cars out of these two areas on the now existing Cliff Road . This would put Cliff over the estimated 23, 000 cars it can successfully handle without further road work per the county engineers letter . (Copy attached . ) In talking with Robert Sandene, the county engineer, he could not foresee a signal at this intersection as there are now existing signals just west on River Hills Drive and Cliff Road , and just East on Cedar Avenue and Cliff Road. He could foresee a growing traffic problem created by such high density- developments fo-r,people exiting off Slaters Road onto Cliff Road, whereby in the future they would only be able to exit East and be unable to cross theA ntersection due to traffic conjestion. (This is further explained in; our petition. ) An additional 1441 - continued - Mayor Bea Blomquist - 3 - May 27 , 1981 signal would be needed a short distance down from Slaters Road at the Zachman Dev new entrance. Need I mention that one single 4-way signal alone costs $80, 000. Highway 13 , the new Cedar Freeway , etc . , are the first concerns of the county engineers office , with regard to additional semiphores needed in this area. A semiphore proposal looks good on paper but in the final plan, that ' s something else to consider . A semiphore cannot be installed until the appropriate time when the county staff determines that the amount of existing traffic warrants one . Burnsville had years of near insanity trying to accomplish the installation of just one signal at the intersection of River Hills Drive and Cliff Road , and then after approval had to wait another year longer yet . The economic conditions of today provoke developers to request rezoning and replating of their land to higher density use as the more units a builder can put on a piece of land, the less cost per unit . As stated in our petition, we are reasonable as to the City progressing and growing, we are not fighting for the continuation of the past in the present, we are aware of the demands for change , but our resistance to change is the R3 and R4+ high density rezoning proposal which is in direct contrast to the established single family neighborhoods . We have put in much time , effort and investigation, as concerned citizens . We are in 100% opposition of the high density rezoning proposals that our areas seem to be expected to accept and live with. We are concerned for the safety and welfare of ourselves , and our children . We are concerned with all the above high density proposals and tremendous traffic problems that would be caused by such . We are deeply concerned with the concerns of our fire people with regard to rescue services to our area. We feel the Winkler-Jackson development spouts commercialism and is premature due to no timetable for connection of the Slaters Road with the Burnsville Crosstown. We feel there has been no regard shown to the interrelationship between the existing wild-life and it' s environment. (Some previously here , some driven in by further developments and high construction. ) No park provisions . We feel we have the chance, and the obligation, to state our views regarding stopping here with the Eagan population explosion and at least keep this NWS of Section 31 down to Rl and R2 zoning . By the report requested from the Asst . Police Chief Berthy, of which I previously mailed you a copy, we are one of the quietest and least troublesome grids in Eagan. That in itself should speak out. With the help of our City Council we can stay a peaceful residential area with lower density zoning . This is our appeal to you before going to the City Council Meeting, 6 : 30 p .m. , on June 2 , 1981 regarding the Winkler-Jackson Dev Rezoning Request which the planning committee voted to deny , please consider a firm no to high density rezoning in this section. In summation, the above views are expressed by all, as you will note on the petitions we have submitted to the planning committee at the April 28 meeting and the May. 26 meeting. I ,alpo have attached a copy of each for your file, a report from the county 'engineers office, our presentation to the park planning, committee on May 7, and our presentation to the planning committee on April 28 . 142 In advance , let me thank you for your time and efforts . Respectfully submitted , Jean Zempel__ 2245 James rmirt Raann _ MN r TO THE CITY COUNCI&ANNING COMMITTEE ANDMAYOR • PETITION IN OPPOSITION OF WINKLER-JACKSON REZONING EPROPOSALIST 5/18/81 We, the undersigned, are residents of Slaters Acres, who have additionally petitioned Signatures of other concerned residents in the surrounding communities of River Woods Homes, S. River Hills, River Woods Townhouses, East River Hills, and Kings Drive, who border the NWZ of Section 31 T27N/R23. All are op sed density rezoning and development of this section which iselandlocked d to the rbyothe high Burnsville border and the Cedar Freeway. We are opposed to the high density rezoning requests for the following reasons: We feel traffic problems must be given high priority is a dead end and will remain a dead end until land toothe aSouth oof thisters sectiondis developed. This section will continue to be supported only by one single dead end access road. Simply said, a semiphore might be paid for in part by the developers Winkler-Jackson & Zachman, yet a semiphore at this intersection would be only a Partial solution to the problem of the saturation of Cliff Road that will be permitted by such high density rezoning and development. A semiphore cannot be installed until the appropriate time when the county staff determines that the amount of existing traffic warrants one. The county engineer, Robert Sandene, cannot foresee a signal at this intersection as there are now existing signals just west on River Hills Drive and Cliff Road, and just East on Cedar Avenue and Cliff Road. He could foresee a growing traffic problem created by such high density developments for people exiting off Slaters Road onto Cliff Road, whereby in the future they would only be able to exit East and be unable to cross the intersection due to traffic conjestion problems. We feel that any proposed plan for this NWk of Section 31 should envision and incorporate adequate play and park facilities to accomodate existing and proposed new families. The proposed Winkler-Jackson development for this site, a 92 acre parcel of land, makes no provision for play or park areas, has shown no concern for the interrelationship between wild life and their natural environment, and has suggested townhouse tot lots, which would be unreasonable for teenage children to t relate to. The Winkler-Jackson type of rezoning and development puts excessive emphasis on profit, by the development of the Phase I commercial area first, which would devaluate the surrounding properties and not be aood quality residential development. g guideline for further high The economic conditions of today provoke developers to request rezoning and replatin of their land to higher density use as the more units a builder can put on a piece of land, the less cost per unit. This makes the question of density a very_majorproblem! We, the undersigned, are reasonable as to the City progressing and growing, not fighting for the continuation of the past in the present, we are aware ofetheedemands for change, but our resistance to change is the R3 and R4 high density rezoning proposal which is in direct contrast to the established single family neighborhood of Slaters Acres and surrounding communities. The Winkler-Jackson proposed rezoning is very unreasonable in relationship to this. When evaluating the Winkler-Jackson high density development rezoning request please consider what it will do to the existing neighborhQoOs, and to our community. We ' ' - continued - ► PACE 2 TO THE CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE AND MAYOR BEA BLOMQUIST 5/18/81 PETITION IN OPPOSITION OF WINKLER-JACKSON REZONING PROPOSAL request your consideration of all the above, and of greater importance yet, emergency vehicle station locations with relation to the now existing and proposed high density developments North and South of Cliff Road off Slaters Road. Consider emergency vehicle access in and out of Slaters dead end road. As an example, if there were a hazardous accident or fire at the entrance to Slaters Road, there would be no way in, and no way out. You cannot speak futuristically about such a situation as we face just that today. It is a timely issue when considering rezoning requests upwards of 2,000 to 3,000 people with one supporting access road. An alternative might be a frontage road into the existing area. We are in direct opposition of the Winkler-Jackson high density rezoning request and feel the planning committee, the City Council, and the concerned citizens need more time to work together towards a rezoning proposal acceptable to all. I i 4� . :i ii �.3, J.70i • CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE AND MAYOR BEA BLO+IQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA We, the undersigned, residing in the Slaters Acres area bordering the NW14 of Section 31 T27N/R23W proposed for development, attended a meeting in the City Hall on April 22 regarding this land, and we are OPPOSED to the proposal. The R4 section which would feature apartment buildings, up to 3-story in heighth, housing 12-18 family units, would bring into this one section alone approximately 250 new families and-has no relationship whatsoever to the 1-family dwellings now built there. The decision to zone this R4 was said to be undesirable land next to the new freeway. Referencing the 2-4-6 dwelling Townhouses proposed in the R3 area on the West side of Slaters Road, this also would bring in approximately 250 new families. In the Cliff Road area it is feasible there would be some professional and small neighborhood buildings, but not likely on the West side of Slaters Road bordering the natural pond. In this proposed development site there has been no provisions made for play or park areas, and there has been no concern for interrelationship between the wild life and their natural environment. We have many deer, pheasant, mallard ducks, wild birds, etc. , in this wooded area. Bringing office buildings,apartment buildings, 2-4-6 family Townhouses, and 2-family dwellings (5 of which will border the south side of James Street) into a 1-family dwelling community is totally out of pattern or relationship to the original social and cultural conditions that influence the life of these people already there. Our school systems are over-crowded now, and Slaters Acres children have been bounced back and forth through the last 9 years to Northview Elem, Westview Elem, Cedar Park Elem, Rosemount Elem, Rosemount Sr High, Valley Middle School and Apple Valley Sr High. Last year they.were going to make a change again back to Rosemount, once again we protested, and finally were recognized and advised our children would be able to finish their school years in a stable school system. We DO NOT want our children's school years disrupted again, and there is every indication of just that happening because we border this area with such radical dense changes proposed. THIS IS OUR PETITION OF OPPOSITION to the planning committee and to the City Council with a request to consider the above before the May 19 Council Meeting where a decision will be made regarding this proposed development site which would cause over-crowding and thoughtless disruption of this beautiful natural wooded area. We suggest considering an architectural proposal which would compliment the natural foliage and lend grace and beauty to Eagan and our community which would be a more conscious act with regard to the surroundings. Apartment buildings are in a manner opposite to what is logical, and would make the area 'too dense. - 451 ROBERT P. SANDEEN. P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER I,A K O l �., (, 0 1- :` T 1 TELEPHONE: -L L 612-437-0390 'DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER . J 1560 HWY. 55•HASTINGS. MINNESOTA 55033 _ ST. PAUL MPLS. • * 0DAX0-TT,A May 1 , 1981 Ms . Jean Zempel 2245 James Court Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Ms . Zempel : As you requested in your telephone conversation with Mr. Bob Sandeen on 4-30-81 the following data is provided for your information. 1980 Average Daily Traffic on County State Aid Highway 32 from Minnesota Trunk Highway 13 to Kennelly Road = 14,600 vehicles. 1980 Average Daily Traffic on County State Aid Highway 32 from K&nelly Road-to County State Aid Highway 23 = 11 ,900 vehicles. Dakota County,anticipates the demand on this road will exceed 30,000 vehicles per day by the year 2000. We estimate the vehicle capacity of a four lane undivided roadway without turn lanes to be 23,000 vehicles per day. Sincerely, Peter L. Sorenson Traffic Engineer PLS:ar ✓ r AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER F To lbe presented Thu Oay, May 7 , 1981 , City hal*b - Slaters Acres Residents 7 : 00 p .m. (Park Commission/Winkhr Dev) We, as residents of Slaters Acres , meet here with reference to the proposed rezoning of NW1 Section 31 . We feel the area just north of James Street that Winkler/Jackson Development has requested to be zoned R4 would be an ideal location for a mini park, and a desirable location this side of 35E and the new Cedar Freeway for possible consideration of a tennis court site, for use by old, and proposed new residents of Eagan. Along the north side of James Street are gentle slopes free from pedestrians and traffic to provide for safe sliding , sleding, or tobaganning, that end in a flat area where sleds can come to a safe halt. The area is large enough to permit a side path to be marked on which children can safely walk their sleds or tobagans back to the top . The area is free of tree stumps or large rocks . There is a small pond for winter hockey skating and other winter skating activities . In the spring and summer months the new duck families use these small ponds to live on. To the wild- life , this is the environment they are now accustomed to . There are trails already cut in here for our winter cross country skiers from Eagan, Slaters Acres , and Burnsville . The landscaping for cross-country skiing is ideal. There is a wide buffer of trees between this area and the new Cedar Highway. 147 -2- Our children thoroughly enjoy taking tents and camping out "in the woods" , so to speak, and in this area they are close to home yet feel far away . On an overnight excursion they can experience the enjoyment of nature, yet be safe. A backboard could be positioned on a grassy spot for tossing a basketball . Sometimes young people need to just "get away" , and the perfect place would be one we have chosen for them. To be alone, to think, or for form of neighborhood playful activity . A park is a tract of land for public use in or near a city . Ln Slaters Acres we seem to cause a dilemna as we are termed isolated, With the rezoning , and progressive growth of the communities around us , and now the question about our own I growth', we will no longer be isolated . That is why we can see the need for a designated park area . We have none within a safe distance for our children to play at, or get to . Mr . Hilla who owns the Southern section of land behind Slaters Acres stated at the April 28 meeting his area "will be developed shortly down the road" . Now is the time a park becomes a timely issue , before this land has been developed to a point where no land can any longer be designated for park use . The abundance or scarcity of a population may fluctuate widely , but there are definite upper and lower limits to its density . We chose to live in a more primitive society in harmony with the natural world . Not in a communiO -where each back yard 4� -3- becomes the other person' s front yard . All environmental mistakes have a common foundation in man ' s efforts to rearrange nature to suit his immediate ends . This is known as ecological simplification. Interruption over and over again of the totality or pattern of relations between organisms and their environment. To make simpler, and simpler , and simpler to diminish in scope . We are proud to still be a particularly rewarding place for the study of population species but this is only because of the relative simplicity of our "natural"community . We need nature paths . We need space for wild-life . We need trees for owls , and need not disrupt the home of the now present red eagle family. , We have some deer, and we have delightful children grown, and growing, who because of this natural surrounding enjoy 'chipmunks scampering around their yards , mallard ducks pecking worms off the driveways after the rain, making sure baby ducks all get into the ponds when something frightens them and they have run from their mother . Eagan can be a city like all other cities . . . . . . . sprinkling housing projects , spouting commercialism, etc . , or it can become a community valued and respected by all as we feel about it now. With more consideration more concern for it 's youth, some parks and wooded areas left for children and natural animals , birds , etc , Eagan will be richer then money will ever seem. We do not feel we should be victims of a population explosion. I think it is time we taKe a lead, instea`d','of. being followers , r and stick to some of the established goals and beliefs being 14� printed in our papers . Against commercialism, and with respect -4- for what our city will reflect in this nation 50 to 100 years from now. People are leaving the Big Cities . Why? Just ask that question, why? Because they want to live like we do now! In a natural, peaceful, more primitive , not over- crowded environment - with a place for children to play . In the country as they speak. We can still survive as a city without being subjected to the reasons why people are moving out here. That ' s the bottom line . What do we want in the future? What will we have to deal with looking at - escalated traffic conditions , the problem that presents , over-crowding our school system, splitting districts because they are over their limits , over-populated areas and no land reserved for park areas to accommodate the density . Somewhere there has to be a norm - a place to slow down - a limit to over-dense areas and provision for children to play . All these are reasons we are here , we want to live, and chose in NWk Section 31 to live in Eagan, and why we feel a park/is indeed a good investment in the future for Eagan, and its ' children . **Presented to ARlanning Committee April 28, 190re Winkler-Jackson Development Company proposedigh density rezoning to NW-4ofSection 31 X I am Fred Drexler and have been asked to speak on behalf of those, who like myself are presently property owners and residing in Slaters Acres. We are here tonight, as a united group and are 100% in opposition to the proposed rezoning and development project submitted by the Winkler Development Company in reference to the NW`-4 of Section 31. Although not all of us were able to be here tonight in person, I did bring along a petition signed by all of the residents of Slaters Acres voicing their objections and concerns to the proposed development. In the relatively short time since we were first informed of the rezoning, we have done some investigation, and have found that the City of Eagan has already completed and submitted a 'proposed rezoning plan of their own, to the Metropolitan Planning Board. This plan is within reason, with regard to the density level, continuity between the new and existing surroundings,and the overall environmental impact on our community. But even this plan must be further improved by adding a park or recreational area for our children, which would be free of traffic. As in all communities, the safety of our children is of utmost importance. The City Plan suggested zoning of approximately 60% of the total area for R2, multi-family use, with the remainder, which is near Cliff Road, to be zoned equally between R4, apartment complexes, and limited and/or neighborhood businesses. In order to conform more closely to our existing community, we firmly believe that the area just south of James Street and bordering the existing single family lots, which are a minimum of % acre each, be changed from R2 to Rl. It has already been acknowledged that this area is°grdatly restricted in J � width. If it is not suitable for singlCC, �family use, then it certainly cannot be suitable for multifamily use. We ''o further recommend that the equivalent area designated for R4, apartment complexes, be converted for park use or left in it's natural state for conservation purposes. This plan, if followed, would still result with a density level 3 to 6 times the present level. Mr. Winkler's rezoning plan is in direct opposition to the wishes and expectations of all the residents of Slaters Acres, which presently consists of nothing but single family homes. It is also in direct conflict with those living in River Woods, which borders the proposed development. For this reason we have invited them here tonight, so that they may also voice their concerns. The Winkler Development also has made no provisions for park use and has shown complete disregard for the wildlife and their natural environment. This area, which is heavily wooded, has several deer, many ducks, pheasants and numerous small animals, which were here originally, and others, which have recently been driven in as a result of the surrounding highway and expanding development projects in the area. The Winkler Development, which is a clear deviation to the rezoning plan submitted by the City of Eagan, would result in a significantly greater density level, and would as a minimum, be 6 to 8 times that of the present level. The total development population would easily reach and exceed 2000 people. It is also very interesting to note that the highest density zoning, R4, would be virtually right next door to our existing single family homes with no adequate buffer zone inbetween. Mr. Winkler contends this is necessary due to the lay of the land and the location of the new Slaters Road and Cedar Avenue. Let us remind him, that we of Slaters Acres, had no say in the location of or width of right of way for either road. This being the case and resulting road improvement assessments to o this ' rElrt P P y, is more of a personal problem between Mr. Winkler, the-'Department of Transportation and 3 - the City of Eagan. Maybe an excellent alternative for this area of limited width, would be to leave it in its natural state both for wildlife con- servation and as a buffer to Cedar Avenue, or else develop for park use. The new roads have already drastically changed our neighborhood, which is no longer as private, secluded and surrounded on all sides by undeveloped and heavily wooded terrain. These were the very reasons for which we purchased or built our homes here. Furthermore, we are greatly distressed with Mr. Winkler's order of priorities in completing his development. He plans to start and complete the commercial zoning area, prior to starting and completing the residential portion, which is just opposite the normal order of completion for most developments of this type. But,' I am sure that in all probability, this method will provide Mr. Winkler with the quickest financial return, at the greatest financial risk to us, through the possible wholesale market devaluation of our property, should the residential portion of the development not go as advertised. Our final objection is, what consideration has the City of Eagan and the planning board made for the education of our children, should this development rapidly grow to 2000+ people? Our schools are already over-crowded. There also has been in the recent past, several discussions, because of our isolation and remoteness within Eagan, that our children be transferred to the Burnsville school district. I can assure you that we all desire to remain a part of Eagan and we also want to be assured of continued use of the present Apple Valley School District. We all are aware that the community must and tail continue to grow, but not s • - 4 - • totally at the expense of the people already there. Rather the growth should be 1) shared by the majority of all Eagan residents, 2) it should consider the possible over-crowding of our school system, 3) it should reflect consideration and respect for environmental impact on wildlife, 4) it should consciously be developed in a manner to blend in and enrich the natural surroundings to enhance our existing communities, as opposed to the discontinuity that would result by the zoning in close proximity of each other, apartment complexes, and single family homes. The main objective of any architectural development should be blending of communities, not the disruption of communities. This property, which has been designated isolated, remote, undeveloped and supposedly suitable for only limited commercial and relatively high density ty residential use, is our neighborhood and includes natural ponds, woods, and an abundance of wildlife, plus virtual seclusion and privacy. It provides a country atmosphere, which is the basic reason we live here. We are willing to grow, but we will not be suffocated by over-development of this natural land, because of the lack of consideration toward wildlife, recreational areas for the safety of our children, and the discontinuity between the new and the existing developments. We, in Slaters Acres may be small in size 'and numbers, but we are strong in our beliefs and convictions and are 100% united in our decision against the Winkler rezoning proposal, which would bring in more than 600 new families, with a majority living in 2-4-6 unit townhouses and apartments, possibly three stories high, housing 12-18 families each. The remaining commercial zoning would also not enhance our present quality of life. We ask that your decision to the- City Council rega�'aing-the Winkler Development be a strongand ' ✓ r supportive no vote, and thdt the planning board, the City - S - Council and we, the concerned citizens, can work together to come up with an acceptable rezoning proposal offering the few things just described, which we as citizens of Eagan have every right to expect. Because we are united, we want to know and feel that you have the obligation to inform us as to how we are to properly proceed in this matter. We would like the issue resolved here, tonight, by a show of your support, or if you do not agree, that you advise us of our next step in order to reach a more favorable decision. We have an obligation to be reasonable, however the Winkler Development in its present form is absolutely and definitely unreasonable, and as such is totally unacceptable and we of Slaters Acres, should not be forced to live with it. r April 29, 1981 o. MAY Mr . Robert Sandene ` MAY County Engineer j l�gl W. Dakota Cnty. Hwy. Dept . 1560 W. .Hwy. 55 ,p Hastings , MN 55033 Dear Mr . Sandene : 9 �! I represent the Slaters Acres property owners/homeowners who attended a public meeting on April 28, 1981 , City Hall , regarding ?the proposed Winkler/Jackson Eagan rezoning and development of the NWS of Section 31 . Homeowners of Slaters Acres , and bordering Burnsville homeowners , presented their case in 100% opposition of this rezoning, signed and gave petitions to this effect to the City Council Planning Committee . After 1� hours deliberation the Chairperson moved for "an indefinite delay (30-45-60 days) or however long it takes to study the traffic problem that definitely exists with the Winkler/Jackson proposed rezoning , and high density proposed development" to this now nude land . We , as concerned citizens and homeowners in Slaters Acres, think this decision warrants a "traffic study" with regard to such rezoning proposals , by the county engineers ' office . The state constructed the new Slaters Road access to Cliff Road when our present access road , James Street , was cut off for the new Cedar 1 Hwy in Eagan. A 4-lane dead end access road (Slaters Road) that now is prompting high density/residential and commercial developers to propose rezoning to high density R3, R4 and limited business areas in this Section 31 (NW14) . The dilemna is we are an isolated area, bordered by new Hwy 35E , conjested Cliff Road , Cedar Avenue daily, and zoo traffic , not to mention traffic prompted by the opening of the new Cedar Avenue bridge these past months . The proposed rezoning would propose upward to 4500 cars use of Slaters Road . We are concerned not only with this unreasonable escalation in traffic, but the unsafe conditions we feel would be permitted if this rezoning were to be approved . The new Slaters Road has created a major problem to the existing Slaters Acres families . We would like a study of Emergency Vehicle access in and out, Emergency Vehicle Station locations with relation to the now existing, and proposed high density ,- developments . (Possibly 600+ new families , 1500-3000 people using this section of land of approximately 41-44 acres) continued - s ' ;e E ♦ ' 0 - 2 _ Our homes are on James Court , off of James Street , which is a cul-de-sac, with only Slaters Road access in, and out . Winter months there are times now we never get plowed out ! Please consider this request as a "timely issue" and a study warranted at this time of rezoning proposals . Take into consisideration no place for- the Slater Road dead end to go, no semiphore proposals in the near future for the smooth flow of traffic to homeowners , school bus services , and/or emergency situations , and also the percentage of teenage drivers , drivers under-the-influence of alcohol, etc . , that might travel this road without concern for others around , or city ordinances regarding speed limits , right-of-way , so forth . The rezoning goes before the City Council on May 19 , 1981 for possible approval if all requirements for better development by Winkler are meta Since 1960 Eagan, a population of 3, 382 people , has increased its size 6 to 7 times , 'to 21, 700 in 1980. It is unreasonable to believe that 1500-3000 people should be situated on this parcel of land and unreason- able to believe they can safely come into the area and exit out on one dead end 4-lane road . I look forward to hearing from you, and receiving copies of any future studies you may plan to this traffic problem in Eagan. Respectfully submitted , s J . A. Zempel 2245 James Court Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: 454-5835 Work : 681-5189 cc : Paul H. Hauge City Attorney Eagan City Hall ayor Bea Blomquist Eagan City Hall y� l f _ Winkler Development Co. Winkler Development Co. 14801 GLAZIER AVENUE.APPLE VALLEY.MN 55124(61 2)432-7101 May 28, 1981 Honorable Mayor Bea Blomquist and Eagan City Council: I have requested that Mr. Hedges attach this letter to my plans to reflect our position as to the current status of our overall plan and to offer a possible alternate. We have spent many, many hours working on our plan and we believe we have found the proper land uses. The 92 acre site is somewhat isolated with the Cedar Freeway on the east, Cliff Road on the north and the City of Burnsville on the west. Slater's Road is built with the utilities in and assessed to the property. Flat paper does not do justice to this piece of property. The topography throughout the property varies by 50 feet in many areas and is heavily wooded. Along with the alignment of existing Slater's Road and Highway 77, the two features created most of our land uses. To date, the City Staff has recommended our proposal and the Planning Commission has not recommended approval. The Planning Commission says there is too much commercial zoning. The 8.6 acres of limited business located on the west side of Slater's Road could be changed to R4 multiple. This is a low area, 50 feet below Cliff Road, abutting the pond. Because of the flood plain level of the pond, basements could not be constructed without excessive filling. However, either an office building or a con- dominium could be constructed on a concrete slab. This area is not wooded and it is exposed to the Cedar Freeway. It is probably best suited for a two or three story office building, but could also accommo- date a two or three story condominium. I would like to offer this alternate as a possible solution to the Planning Commission's recommen- dation. We believe we have followed the Comprehensive Plan very closely and compare very well in densities and land use. We look forward to our June 2 meeting With the City Council. Yours tri y, Richard W. Winkler � S- 7 ,A r ,Agenda Information Memo May 29, 1981 H Page Twenty-Two PERSONNEL POLICY A. Revised Personnel Policy -- In 1977, the Personnel Committee and City- Council adopted the first formal Personnel Policy for the City of Eagan`. Since 1;9;77, several language amendments and changes have been., -made in various collective bargaining contracts. ,The City Administrtor is attempting to update the Personnel Policy so that language defined in , those contracts becomes consistent with ' benefits allowedfor middle and top management. There were also a number of minor changes;,required to provide better language clarification for the reader. Stage law has made some minor changes in addition to the other . revisions. The City staff has spent a great deal of time "at both -the." staff retreat and staff meetings attempting to provide an equitable update, .of the 'Personnel Policy. 4 P y A copy of `the Personnel Policy is enclosed for review and' considera- tion by the City Council. Wth .the , ..amount of reading .for this r City Councilpacket, may not be practical or feasible to discuss in any detail the Personnel Policy at the' June 2 meeting. However, a procedure as to how the Personnel policy should be reviewed should be considered. Whether the City; Council desires to review the Personnel Policy document at a .regular. meeting or have its Personnel Committee meet,' review the document and propose a recommendation to the City Council should be discussed. The City Administrator' will discuss this matter in further detail at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To determine the procedure as to how the Personnel Policy' s:hould" be reviewed. ORDINANCE-#36-REVISION B. Ordinance #36 Revised -- The, City .has been following the 1976 Uniform Building' Code provisions:" It is recommended that Ordianceu #36 be amended to provide for reference to "the 1979 uniform Building f' .w Code. Ordinance #36 is presented for ecinsderation for amendment only to make the change , in reference `.fo ►. .the 1976 to the 1979 Uniform Building Code. The City, is also ,rasing the ' 1964 table for establishing building, permit fees.' It i,s .a recommendation of the Chief Building Inspector and City Administrator` that the 1979 Table( 3A for establishing .building permit fees for the . City of Eagan. Withthe constraints placed qn tunici.pal.i"t`ies for the .ability to u raise :and collect additional taxe"s, user fee schedules will become more mini-municipal• -services.% , y increasing the building permit fee, additional revenues for the"general fund can be collected . through .this user, charge; ' For` $ copy of the revised ordinance and building permit fee schedule,`- ease refer to`- pages j through 4vii f ' 'ACTION, TO BE CONSI lERED ON THEA EWER. TO,< ki.ther "approve or deny amendments to Ordinance #36 and. r appro�€e,or deny' the fee schedule as proposed. u ftn 7r CITY OF EAGAN AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 36 BUILDING CODE AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, CONVERSION. DEMOLITION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA AND MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF EAGAN PROVIDING FOR THE ISSU- ANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREFOR. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES HEREBY RIND ITS ORDINANCE N0. 36 AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 36.01 - PURPOSE. This ordinance is enacted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Section 471.62, as amended, and other applicable laws of the State of Minnesota. The pur- pose of this ordinance is to provide uniform rules for the regulation of building in the City of Eagan. SECTION 36.02 - MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE. Subdivision 1. Code Adopted. The Minnesota State Building Code (hereinafter referred to as `the "MSBC") , one copy of which is on file in the office of the Eagan City Clerk, has been adopted by Laws 1977, Chapter 381, as a uniform building code applicable throughout the state. The most recent edition of this code is hereby confirmed as the building code of the City of Eagan and incorporated in this ordi- nance as completely as if set out in full. All provisions of the MSBC, or supple- mentary-documents upple-mentarydocuments and codes referred to therein, which are or are not required by state law to be adopted by the City are adopted unless they are specifically men- tioned tioned herein. Subdivision 2. Supplementary Documents and Codes The 1980 edition of the MSBC includes or references several codes and appendices pertaining to buildings, and the following codes and appendices are not adopted by this ordinance: (1) 1979 Uniform Building Code Appendix, Chapter 70; and (2) Minnesota State Building Code Appendix "D", Building Security Sections 4101-4110. SECTION 36.03 - REPEALER. Ordinance No. 3 of the City of Eagan entitled "Building Permits" as amended is repealed in its entirety. Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Eagan entitled "Regula- tions Governing Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning" is repealed in its en- tirety. Ordinance No. 24 of the City of Eagan entitled "Plumbing" is repealed in its entirety. Amended Ordinance No. 36 dated December 18, 1973, is repealed in its entirety and replaced by this ordinance. SECTION 36.04 - PERMIT FEES. Permit fees shall be determined in accordance with Table 3-A of Chapter 3 of the Uniform Building Code. SECTION 36.05 - PENALTY. Any person who shall violate any provision of this ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $500.00 or by imprisonment not to exceed 90 days or both. SECTION 36.06 - INVALIDITY. The invalidity of any part of this ordinance as declared by a court of competent jurisdiction shall not affect the validity of the remainder thereof. SECTION 36.07 - CONFLICTING ORDINANCES REPEALED. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 36.08 EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAGAN By By City Clerk Its Mayor Date Original Ordinance Adopted: November 17,_ k970 Date First Amended Ordinance Adopted: February',6, 1979 Date Second Amended Ordinance Adopted: I / Q Date of Publication in the Dakota County Tribune: Q MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM[: DALE PETERSON, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE: MAY 27, 1981 SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT FEES - 1964 TABLE 3A VS. 1979 TABLE 3A The permit fees now in effect have not changed since 1971 and we are considerably lower than any other city around us. However, until recently Eagan's associated fees which consist of water connections, sewer charges and road availability charges have been higher. Valuation Present Fees Table 3A, 1979 U.B.C. $10,000 $33.00 $80.50 $25,000 $78.00 $170.50 $50,000 $140.50 $283.00 $1002000 $215.50 $433.00 Each Additional $1000 $1.00 $2.50 Plan Check Fees 50$ of Permit Fee 65% of Permit Fee Note: Table 3A of 1964 Edition of Uniform Building Code is now being used. t /61 a y .� Agenda Information Memo „ May 29, 1981 Page Twenty-Three SIGN COMMITTEE UPDATE C. Sign Committee.Update -- A Sign Committee meeting was held on. May 27, 1981 for the purpose of addressing business signs for those business establishments adjacent to freeways or -interstates within the community. City Councilmembers'' Egan and Smith, City Administrator Hedges, Martin Colon, Tom Gegax and , Howard, Johnson of the Eagan` Standard, David Bohne of the APC, Ben Hammond repre- -senting U ' Haul`, Nancy ,Jorganson."from Nagle, and Mike Gifford from a sign company were present f, the `meeting. The meeting was approximately 2 hours in length and the specific considerations that came out of the meeting were as follows; 1. To consider an amendmentJ ' to " the business sign section of the sign ordinance that 'would read .as follows : "An on- premise pylon sign' for ide'ntification " purpo.ses 'is allowed fora business located directly adjacent to- a freeway within the City of Eagan. Any business that chooses to errect a pylon sign for freeway identification is allowed a second sign not to exceed " a free standing ground sign on. the pro- perty.". The size of the sign was proposed at 125 square feet, the height is to be .either 3� feet or language stating a height of F 27 feet with additional height considered if required for freeway visability. 2 There were two other considerations that were of concern to the group. The 'first consideration was made by Council- members regarding a definition •Of distance between the signs for a ground sign- 'and pylon sign located on primise of a business „establishment. 3. The second consideration, was' made by the business community specifically the representative .; of the Eagan Standard as to how. the City wouli ali4w. .them to address pricing ~ on their signs. If they choose to. errect a pylon sign `s and cannot include pricing on" .,the sign a "ground sign is � not adequate for the pric;tng,irifgtation either. Therefore, the representatives of the`Ea:ga t;;lord wanted the ability to include flexibility on the- freeway pylon sign to allow for pricing within the 125 square' feet. ACTION ` TO BE CONSIDERED ON THEMAT';. To either discuss the findings of the sign committee and,-make a .-recommendation for amend- ment to the sign ordianance as prepared• "by the City ' Attorney & City . Administratoror' .` ontinue ,ehi.tem, until the .lune, 16," 1981 meeting to discuss the 1matter in! furiher detail o , S lot 77 i n s E ,044, �Ittformation Memo i { 4Y , 1981 'age Twe, ty E'our r = P ' CONTRACT 81-6 31. C81d and. Specs + _ t 4t (ab f'Center If . heating foxaprovd oin June 2 the plays Y s��ci�f-tat ons w� ��;. ' " Vin_ c�cr�er a'fot review, onsideration ,by $' otincil. ' 1l right=of wad "rt cess ry £nr :Chis nstallatio ;4edLcated with }Matting rtaf 'the Pilot `Knob Center Adcit°iflx >wlt the exception c . sx .,l easeret R:requrred for Pilot:' ..v Add it�o�►* Z °:;is an Chet this easement wilder ecAil uted by ng en T 's " it31 ' :TQ ,$ C1I : ; the �i�#e harp ngr I�'x©ject 333 is approve ` die glans :a :' peic'atias ` far Cdntret g - aad. a ► i t ,� iem ? t r lds with a 'k d A opening scheduled, feru�r$day} ' ► :11, .at i�?:3f1 a.m. ti 7 i ` :r Connect,- - ", rpv � � eeifiatien for - Coachman 'p Comp(00 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 29, 1981 SUBJECT INFORMATIONAL MEMO NUWAY BUILDERS VS. CITY OF EAGAN Enclosed on page A50 is an update on the status of the appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court regarding NuWay Builders vs. City 'of Eagan. JAIL FACILITY The City Administrator and City Planner met with the Dakota County Planner to discuss the progress of the jail facility for northern Dakota County. The county is planning to select an architect con- currently with the County Planning Staff working on a number of site locations that would be feasible for a combined court facility and jail facility in this part of the county. The City will be contacted sometime in the late summer months regarding sites that are being proposed within the City of Eagan. The court facility is proposed at 10,000 to 12,000 square feet wtrile the, jail facility is proposed at 10,000 square feet. According to the County Planner and County Commissioner John Voss, approximately four acres will be required for the combined facility. The county is concerned about accessibility and elimination of staff duplication. County Commissioner Voss has indicated that if the site that is being looked at adjacent to the Dakota County Library on the City' s 40 acres would be acceptable to the county and City, more than likely the four acres would not be an additional taking but would be a part of the ten acre site dedicated to the county for the library facility. This is only a consideration if this site becomes a strong consideration. SAFETY RECORD OF JOE CONNOLLY Enclosed is a letter from the American Water Works Association congratulating Joe Connolly regarding the utility department' s outstanding safety record of 1980. (TWX 14C TAX EXEMPT MORTGAGE FINANCING Enclosed on pages, /t 7 through �6 �" is the most recent update regarding the tax exempt mortgage financing. Mr. Dick Lincoln of g Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. , has contacted the City Administrator because our motion of March 13, 1979 reserved the right to sell tax exempt mortgage housing bonds upto 30 million dollars . It is quite possible, with the right market conditions, that the City could sell an additional eight to nine million dollars worth of housing bonds in the near future %',:.', Mr. Lincoln is examining the possibility of such a sale and will be contacting this office in the near future. s/Thomas L. Hedges �p ' City Administrtor PAUL A. HAT-TGE & ASSOCIATES. P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA 55122 PAUL H. HAUGE AREA Com 612 BRADLEY SMITH TELEPHONE 454-4224 KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER RICHARD J. KRAMBEER May 21, 1981 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Nu-Way Builders vs. City of Eagan Dear Tom: On May 19 a pre-hearing conference was held before Justice George Scott at the Minnesota Supreme Court and the following are some observations: Justice Scott came on quite strongly indicating that there is no vested right in zoning classification and repeatedly asked the question of Richard Meshbesher, the attorney for Nu-Way Builders, what his basis for reversing Judge Fitzgerald's District Court decision appeared to be. Mr. Meshbesher stated that his grounds were that Willmus contracted to go through with the rezoning and the Council had arbitrarily rezoned the property to single family after the application was sub- mitted by Nu-Way Builders. Justice Scott cited the Property Research vs. City of Eagan case and stated that he suspected that the Supreme Court will sustain the trial court's findings and decision. Although Justice Scott was deeply involved in a recent decision involving a special use permit that was turned down by the City of Shoreview and the Supreme Court found that there were not adequate reasons for the decision of the City Council, he did state that the City has broad powers in these types of situations. It is expected that it will be quite a few months until the decision is made and in the interim transcripts will be made of all of the testimony and briefs will then be submitted. There will be no oral argument, however. PaulH. y yours, auge skk g5 ' American Water Works Association 6666 West Quincy Avenue ( Denver, Colo. 802351 303 794-7711 1 , May 1981 Joe Connolly Foreman City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Congratulations on your utility's outstanding safety record for 1980. By completing the year without a single disabling accident, you have provided a great benefit not only to your utility but to the industry as a whole. I know I speak for the officers and directors of AWWA as well as for the section officers and safetv chairmen who have worked so hard to achieve an industry-wtde safety performance improvement. The Association's Accident Prevention Committee, supported by section safety chairmen, is expanding its program to provide better opportunities for everyone to reduce accidents. Your continued emphasis on all the aspects of safety and support of AWWA will be of individual and industry-wide benefit. Congratulations again, and keep up the good work. r B. Gilbert ?erome resident JBG:dlb President:JEROME B. GILBERT, Sacramento, California • �� r / President-Eiect. KENNETH J. MILLER, Denver. Colorado ' Vice-President: JOHN H. STACHA, Callas. Texas 4 Immediate Past-President. DONALD K. SHINE, Wyoming, Michigan Treasurer: THOMAS J. BLAIR. 111, Charleston, West Virginia Executive Director:DAVID B. PRESTON, Denver. Colorado DATE: May 22,1981 CITY of F_AC,A $16,940,000--Amount of Program Dollar Amount of Funds Remaining $ 70,395. PLEASE NOTE: This amount can be utilized in any of the following categories: - Single Family, Townhouse, Condo, Mobile Home; Low or Basic Incomes; or any Conventional Loans, including Conventional 950,,.. This does not include the Graduated Pledge Account. At this'time, there are no Graduated Pledqe Funds available. Total Pre-Conynitment Amount $ 15,547,975 Total Reserved (Yet to be Pre-Conmitted) $ 1,321,630 $ 16,940,000 r" '• 7 CITY OF' Ei,'I j Stal_istical Data-- Nuc-)unt of Proyrimrm $16,940,000 Total Pmount of Pre-Cmaiiitted loczns $ 15,5472975_ Porcenta._je of Ioans Pre-Coxilnitted 92 Low Inc,'Ane P,asic Irmccmie Total Nmher of Loans _ _145 131 Average Mortgage Amount $ 52,104 $ 61,015 _ Average Sale Price 58,007 66,362 Average ,ppraisal Value 57,941 67,478 Average Adjusted Gross Income 20,050 � 24,987 Average Gross Income 21,294 26,600 Tvpe of loan: Insured Conventional 6 18 Uninsured Conventional 7 7 FICA VA << Graduated Pledge 23 37 5-- Average Wm to Value Ratio: Insured Conventional 90% Q1� Uninsured Conventional 731 74,% Nu ober of New Construction Loans 1 1 3 _-- � 97 Ntmlber of misting Loans 34 T}VPe of 1A`elling: Single Family 67 87 Condominium 24__ 29 _ 54--___ Mobile Hcs;:es �--- - Average Previous Residents 17% 24G_— NLv=' er of Renters 1Q 94 Number of Otinners __ 39 --- 37 __ Average Age 30.1 Sex: 29.3 - --- Male 96 - Female - - 118 49 13 Average Family Size 1.7 2. 3 Average Number of Children .3 . 6 Marital Status: — Married 59 Single -- 83 7.7 29 Joint 5 13 Divorced FUNDING: 4 6 Lollar Amount of Loans Ilmded $ 14,380,062 Nember or Loans -- —_--- 258- ---