The URL can be used to link to this page

03/16/1999 - City Council Regular AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL-REGULAR MEETING EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING MARCH 16,1999 6:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL&PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ADOPT AGENDA&APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD(10 MINUTE TOTAL TIME LIMIT) IV. RECOGNITIONS&PRESENTATIONS PC2 A. PRESENTATION of commendations by Police Department V. DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS(BLUE) VI. CONSENT AGENDA(PINK) A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Q B. EXTENSION for recording the final subdivision of Oakbrooke-Pulte Homes C. AMEND the grading plan for Town Centre 70 Twenty Second Addition(Mini/USA Equities) D. ACKNOWLEDGE the zoning on PID#10-00200-030-32 E. PROCLAMATION,Burnsville/Eagan Community Television Volunteer Appreciation Day a t f. F. APPROVE extension of meter reading services contract pts G. CONTRACT 98-24,receive bids/award contract(Blue Water Road-Street&Utility / Improvements) Pab H. PROJECT 734,receive final assessment roll,order public hearing(Town Centre Drive 100- Sidewalk) 1. AUTHORIZE agreement with Duke Realty for removal of billboard sign /Fp 3A J. PROJECT 775,receive petition/authorize feasibility report,(Advent United Methodist Church- Sanitary Sewer Extension p K. APPROVE Change Order#6,Cascade Bay ►/�36 L. AWARD work for Cascade Bay entrance gate 39 M. AUTHORIZE submission of application for MRAC grant fN. COMMERCIAL fertilizer applicator license renewal for Minnesota Turf Care VII. 7:00-PUBLIC HEARINGS(SALMON) /Y � A. PROJECT 740,Silver Bell Rd. (Hwy 13 to Kennebec-Reconstruction) VIII. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) JO 60 A. RESIDENT APPOINTMENTS to Cedarvale Area Task Force pB. 1999-2003 Capital Improvement Program ( C. TRAFFIC signal,review Signal Justification Report(Wescott&Lexington Ave.) 83 D. PROJECT 726,authorize storm sewer improvements(Greensboro Addition) E. PROJECT 663,assessment agreement,Valley View Plateau(Nader Nooryshokry) F. BLUE GENTIAN ROAD,consider petition for cul-de-sac IX. NEW BUSINESS(TAN) /10A. ORDINANCE amendment to Chapter 4(Construction Licensing,Permits and Regulation)by modifying language regarding plumbing permit plan reviews y� 113 B. REZONING-Heritage Development,of approximately 12 acres from A(Agriculture)to PD �+r (Planned Development)and a PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION(Cherrywood Knoll)of 36 single family lots,located at 502 Chapel Lane in the NE?4a of Section 12 C. REZONING-Manley Brothers,of approximately 16.4 acres from A(Agriculture)to R-1 (Single Family)and a PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION(Oak Bluffs)to create 36 lots,located on the v northeast corner of Diffley Road and Dodd Road in the SW 1/a of Section 24 D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION-Tri-Land Company,a replat of Forest View to create a new subdivision of 4.54 acres and ten single family lots,located on the west side of Blackhawk Road at the intersection of Blue Cross Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 17 r/ 97 ' 97 E. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION-Nader Nooryshokry(Nader Addition),to create three single family lots legally described as Lot 1,Block 1,Joseph A Spande 1st Addition with the exception of the east 90 feet,located on the corner of Highview Avenue and Bridgeview Terrace in the SW 1/4 of Section 4 pip is- F. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT-Springbrook Corporation,changing the land use of approximately 10 acres from PF,Public Facilities to D-1,Single Family,a REZONING from P(Public Facilities)to R-1 (Single Family),a PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION(Southern Lakes West)to create 15 lots and a VARIANCE to the cul-de-sac length,located east of Hwy.3,abutting the west boundary of Inver Grove Height and north of Cliff Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 25 X. LEGISLATIVEANTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE(GREY) XI. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA(GREEN) XII. VISITORS TO BE HEARD(for those persons not on agenda) XIII. ADJOURNMENT XIV. EXECUTIVE SESSION The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs,services,activities,facilities and employment without regard to race,color,creed,religion,national origin,sex,disability,age,marital status,sexual orientation,or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received,the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. Updated 3/12/99-9:15 a.m. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL Eagan,Mifinesota March 2,1999 A regular meeting of the Eagat:-ity Council was held on Tuesday,March 2, 1999 at 6:30 p.m.at 'the Eagan Municipal Center. Present ivr ib Mayor Awada and Councilmembers Masin,Blomquist, Carlson and Bakken. Also present werp..-'. .CA . y�.Aow' ' .tr% ...... .......xw Up.kjpm Hedges,Senior Planner Mike Ridley, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert;; :!3heldon. AGENDA City Administrator Hedges noted that it had been requested to consider Item C of New Business, Consider Interim Ordinance,greater Cedarvale Area/HAy. 13 corridor,following the approval of the Consent Agenda and prior to public hearings. He further noted that Department of Parks and Recreation Vraa would be providing an update%the sale of season passes to Cascade Bay under Department Head Business. He stated that Item A of Ness? -C-:Busines5;. ,onditional Use Permit-Jeff and Jill Dietz,had been withdrawn by the applicant. He addefthat it w;'60-d be necessary to schedule a Special City Council meeting for March 16 at 4:30 during*ideratiqi€:6f the Administrative Agenda. Mayor Awada moved,Counq d a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 16,1999 REGULAR MEETING Councilmember Blomquist requested that the second sentence on page 12 be revised as follows, "Mayor Awada stated that the committee could meet of information gathering and not for purposes of directing staff to figure out where to ca lioji dollars out of the budget. Councilmember Bloriiquist reassured Mayor Awada that ZARSPXJO?.Iih-It 7 .-tlie meeting." Councilmember Carlson moved,-,C-j*A9.1.m.en&r Blomquist seconded a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 24,*T998 SPECIAL MEETING Councilmember Blomquist moved,Councilmember Masin seconded a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Aye: 2 Nay: 0 (Mayor Awada and Councilmembers Bakken and Carlson abstained since they were not in attendance at the meeting.) MINUTES OF T- SPECIAL MEETING Councilmember Bakken moved,Counciligbrnber Carlson seconded a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Aye: 5 Nay::Jl::::: MINUTES OF-*!-1WfA- 41%-:1- 999 SPECIAL MEETING Councilmember Bakken moved,Councilmember Blomquist seconded a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 DEPA3Z`.:MM0eA BUSINESS YOUTH DEVELOPM ... .-'PROGRAM GRA-NT,PEOPLES NATURAL GAS City Administrator Hedges V, an ve ,rv, w ethis item and thanked Peoples Natural Gas, on behalf of the City,for the grant. ..... ................. . ... ...... .. ........... ..... ......... .11 ... EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES;MARCH 2,1999 PAGE 2 R Councilmember Blomquist moved,Councilmember Masin seconded a motion to accept the grant from Peoples Natural Gas in the amount pf$1,000 to be used toward the Wescott boys and girls ,programs. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 UPDATE ON.-?� 1?tSON PASS SALES Director of Parks and Recrea*irLVraa provided an update on the number of season passes that have been sold to date for Cascade Bad+::::; COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN INFORMATION Councilmember Blomquist moved,Councilmember Carlson seconded a motion to compile data on those parcels with proposed CompNhensive Guide Plan changes into a matrix for use by the City Council. Mayor Awada asked if CounrWember.%6mquist intended for each parcel that is subject to a change in the Comprehensive Guide PlAn;desi 4'6on to be included in the matrix. Councilmember Blomquist stated that only the parcels:#tiat: v change and will become nonconforming should be included. Further discussion occui`red'fega'rding'Yhe approximate number of parcels to be included in the matrix. A vote was taken on the motion. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 CONSENT.A,G8N-DA Councilmember Masin move Bakken seconded a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Blomquist requesteci'iteiiS:' :aici•j be separated from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Masin and Councilmember Bakken'a�**:Councilmember Blomquist's request. A vote was taken on the motion. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 A. Personnel Items Item 1. It was recommended to appro v:t it :} ii ng 9�-p i#:i�-bllin,Jeff Jensen,Brian Rezny,Heather Roberts,Daniel Tocko and Paul TupY%4$.rolice'i<ii j s '9061Pct to successful completion of physical and psychological examination requiremeiEs. Item 2. It was recommended to appgi?i the traer of Joel Fleck from the position of utilities maintenance worker to that of street**:i �i a ic® '43 Item 3. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Claudia Freeman as a part-time seasonal recreation leader. B. Wine and beer license for Magic Thai aftr;::#t',�!*R;;.Scommended to approve a wine and beer license for the Magic Thai Cafe located at 1258.E&'.C1a C 1;ytia C. Temporary beer license for the Eer Lions Club for Ha ch 13,1999-Eagan Go Bragh event. It was recommended to approve the tempt t beer license for tbg.*Fagan Lions Club for March 31,1999- Eagan Go Bragh event. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES;MARCH 2,1999 PAGE D. Approve Public Safety Dispatch Agreement Eagan and Rosemount. It was recommended to approve the 1999 Public Safety Dispatch Agreement between the cities of Eagan and Rosemount. E. Chanite Order No.4,Invoices 1728 :�W 17285 Professional Services Fire Administration building_ It was recommended to approve Change Order No.4 for the Fire Administration building in the amount of $18,989 and to approve Invoices 1728 gffl 3 fp •� * Boarman Kroos Pfister Vogel&Associates. F. Extension for recording the final p}�tof Brookstone-Amcon 1s,Addition It was recommended to approve an extension to May 1,1999,f i .iecording the final plat for Brookstone-Amcon Addition, consisting of one lot on 7.35 acres located west of Hwy. 149 north of Rolling Hills Drive in the SW 1/4 of Section 12. G. Final Subdivision,Wispark Corporation for Grand Oak Two It was recommended to approve a Final Subdivision consisting of 5 lots and 5'(*AA-ots on 57 acres located south of Blue Gentian Road,east of TH 55 in the north 1/2 of Section 2. X. H. Implementation for the Comprehe-53ve Gui&:3PIan Amendment for Kami Inc It was recommended to implement a Comprehensive Guide;P..lad►:Ac�?C► }}dmt.S?r?nging the existing Land Use Guide Plan designation of a 4.4 acre parcel of lana:fot*;*d:',.-. ox 3 iz 0 Doodle Road and east of Coachman Road from Neighborhood Business (NB)to Limited Business (LB). I. Project 770,authorize feasibility report Denmark Ave. (Northwood Parkwav to Clubview Drive- Extension). It was recommended to authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 770 (Denmark Avenue Extension-Street and Utility Improvemw'ts). J. Project 771,authorize feasibility repork Leli# ii 7kR''(Yankee Doodle Road to Lone Oak Road- Upgrade). It was recommended to atJ.' p*`r'k**ze-t2ie'prep�TY tion of a feasibility report for Project 771 (Lexington Avenue Upgrade-Streetrici.>r1lii4Improitements). %K. Project 749,receive feasibilire ort/schedul'e:12a**ii~:�t r g E TH 55 South Frontage Road East of TH 149-Upgrade). It was recommended to receive the raf�ieasibility report for Project 749(East TH 55 South Frontage Road-Street Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 6, 1999. L. Project 758,receive feasibility report/ schedule public hearing Surrey Heights (Federal Drive to Yankee Doodle Road-Street Overlay). This item was pulled from the Consent Agenda. M. Contract 99-01 approve plans/orc-fix---- s i# Cake Ridge Rd Thomas Lake Rd Woodgate 3rd-Street Overlay). This:�f�i�'i was3il#�cl'from the Consent Agenda. N. Contract 99-05, approve plans/oriUt ad for Wo, (Johnny Cake Ridge Road Extension-Street'&Utility Improvements). It was recommender#€d appxgV.eA�;pJaPs fpr Contract 99-05(Johnny Cake Ridge Road Extension-Street and Utility Impro� }t }akitzet a advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 11:00 a.m. on Thursday,April 1,1999. O. Change Order Nos.4& 5,Cascade Bim. It was recommended to approve Changer Order No.4 in the amount of($39,600.00) and Change Order No. 5 in the amount of($3,131.00). P. Agreement with Dakota Hills Mid d W*, -j 661: :fi�aintenance It was recommended to authorize the continuation of a maintenance agr�eent pertamm-g.*k�:the athletic fields at Dakota Hills Middle School. Q. Project 764 reschedule 12ublic hear` (Fe eW.6i ' urrview Acres Street Overlay) It was recommended to reschedule thepub�£fi$Ygriii > t:?} gt; f,4(Selmark,Harvey,Burrview Acres-Street .. Overlay) to be held on April 6,1999. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES;MARCH 2,1999 PAGE 4 Mayor Awada acknowledged the two items that were separated by motion from the consent agenda. In regard to Item L, Project 759,receive feasibility report/ schedule public hearing,Surrey c&:u*A I - -:-:8kT Heights (Federal Drive to Yankee Do Councilmember Blomquist indicated she would be voting against this item: Councilmember Bakken movia-Nayor Awada seconded a motion to receive the draft feasibility report for Project 758 (Surrey Heights*bfive-Street Overlay)and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 6,1999. Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Councilmember Blomquist opposed) In regard to Item M,Contract 99-01,approve plans/order ad for bids (Johnny Cake Rid Thomas Lake Rd.,Woodgate 3rd-S!K.WOverlav),Councilmember Blomquist indicated she would be voting against this item. Councilmember Bakken mov.*�,Councai4mber Carlson seconded a motion to approve the plans for Contract 99-01 (Johnny Cake RidM.-RQji.d-.TJhom4*-.Lake.Rqad,Woodgate 3rd/Tiberon/Mallard Park 3rd-Street Overlay)and authorize th dViei t s r a:k x#opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday,April 1, 1999. Aye: 4 Nay: i'(Counci e er iomquist opposed) Councilmember Bakken moved,Councilmember Carlson seconded a motion to move consideration of the Interim Ordinance,greater Cedarvale Area/H-,vy. 13 corridor,back to Item C of New Business. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 GS VARIAN t_ ISION THNOLOGIES,INC. 3900 Sid X:Y,% QRIAL HIGHWAY City Administrator Hedges provided an over`v'1W,.'0r.*this item. Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve a 30 foot Variance from the required 30 foot setback from a public street for an existing structure located at 3900 Sibley Memorial Highway in the northeast'a of Section 19. The motion failed for lack ofasecond. Councilmember BakkenX.*.T. "er%'TUsin seconded a motion to deny a 30 foot Variance from the required 30 foot sg}Wck frorr �* blic street for an existing structure located at 3900 Sibley Memorial Highway in the northeast'/a of.SeEtion 19. Mayor Awada opened the Quinn Hutson,representing the applicant,stated that the applicant has invested over$100,000 rejuvenating the building and the site. He added that the drive-through canopy,which has resulted in the legal non-conformity,existed prior to the applicant's purchase of the site. He added that the applicant would like to convert this area into useable:d :S&t g.. He further added that the proposal will eliminate access to Rahn Road and wil}:� ..n!�fb-OeA,eNd:4.1�r..safety. Mayor Awada asked if the applicant was aware fltif the Council would be considering a moratorium on development in the ter Cedarvale areaUter in the agenda. Mr. Hutson indicated they were not aware of this. The apphcab*l';:�gpres.qntin ..VWQ4:.T.�chnologies,provided background information on the nature of the bu i this proposal will visually improve the aesthetics of the building. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES;MARCH 2,1999 PAGE 5 Councilmember Masin commended the applicant for improvements he has made to the property but questioned the safety of locating tl%o::Jxuilding addition so close to the road. She asked if the building .would preclude the construction of a ta' .ndjacent to Rahn Road. structure of the canopy are already in place Senior Planner Ridley.stated and he did not know if enclosing the s" `44afety problem. The applicant reiterated that elimination of the access to Rahn Rk;Ad would enhance safety. There being no one else wishig* to speak,Mayor Awada closed the public hearing. Councilmember Masin asked about the affect granting the variance would have on future development of the site. Senior Planner Ridley stated that the variance would only allow the applicant to enclose the existing canopy and any fo'* t er deviations from what is approved by the Council would require additional Council approval. Okincilmdii&r Masin said that,given the explanation provided by Senior Planner Ridley,she would supLoft the vztt�hce. Councilmember Blomquist state4�.gat.she-i5.Pn.qQU.TAgpd to see a successful business in this area X-1-1-1-*-*-1.-:-:-*-*-1-*-* 6 by the redevelopment of the greater and said that she does not believe th*�* Cedarvale area. Councilmember Bakken said that his only concern with the proposal is in regard to the moratorium that is going to be considered by the Council and added that he does not want to create an unrealistic expectation on behalf of the property owner regarding the long term use of the property. Mayor Armada stated that she has.tb .-g... ... .... .4rpv:cp.iii�ms as Councilmember Bakken. She added that if the canopy did not already exist the;-:,0'g1V6 -ivould mt allow a building to be constructed in this area given the setback. She further added thAt nQ.hardship:�as been proven by the applicant. Councilmember Masin said that the 'r'i'v"L*4'*4'b"%'P"k'l'"h.'., a either needs to be improved or removed. She suggested that the Council continue the a ph*can t until discussion about the moratorium has occurred. Councilmember Carlson concurred. The applicant agreed to a 60-day continuance of this item and clarified that the reason they would like to create additional office space in the drive-through area is due to the tremendous growth their business is experiencing. Councilmember Bakken witlia?0;(v his;�k"j:Motion to deny the Variance and Councilmember Masin,as the seconder,concurred wit **the with al. There was no objection by the Council. Councilmember Bakken moi!."CpawA#bember Masin seconded a motion to accept the applicant's request for a 60-day confi� PROJECT 759, (BEAU D'RUE DRIVE-STREET RECYCLING) City Administrator Hedges provided an overview on this item. The Council concurred with s is project may be premature prior to e :7: PlggA the completion of the Cedarvale Are RealleAbpmont studyi} for completion later this fall. Councilmember Blomquist Wved,Councilmemb,P:r;Carlson seconded a motion to deny Project 759,Beau d'Rue Drive(Street Recyc'.'.*.'.' EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES;MARCH 2,1999 PAGE PROJECT 762, (DUCKWOOD TRAIL-STREET RECYCLING) City Administrator Hedges provided an overview on this item. Director of Public Works Colbert introduced Town Kaldunski,representft Howard R.Green Associates,who discussed the project details. Councilmember Bakken moveA COWA h t -�#sin seconded a motion to approve Project 762,(Duckwood Trail-Street Recycliii$ ic1 y Tori ie .0paration of detailed final plans and specifications. Mayor Awada opened the pu$2ic hearing. There being no one wishing to speak,she closed the public hearing. A vote was taken on the motion. Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Councilmember Blomquist opposed) PROJECT 757,(RIDGEV ACRW:=STREET REHABILITATION OVERLAY) City Administrator Hedges p ov'ided ar}'Qverview on this item. City Engineer Matthys gave a staff report. ... Councilmember Bakken mov'e'd;L't'MICiiison seconded a motion to approve Project 757, (Ridgeview Acres-Street Rehabilitation Overlay) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. Councilmember Blomquist asked how the allocation of costs is determined between the City and the benefited property owners for the mill and overlay.;w...4i-';-City Engineer Matthys stated that different assessment rates apply to different zoning clawi#�en5: Mayor Awada opened the pifai earing. Tli re being no one wishing to speak,she closed the public hearing. A vote was taken on the motion. Aye: 4 Na :1 :( iuncilmember Blomquist opposed) PROJECT 763, (DUCKWOOD ESTATES-STREET REHABILITATION OVERLAY) City Administrator Hedges provided an overview on this item. Director of Public Works Colbert introduced Tom Kaldunski,representing Howard R. Green Associates,who discussed the project details. Mayor Awada opened thepr i 'llt;ari Wre S$4hg no one wishing to speak,she closed the public hearing. Councilmember Bakken mays ,Councl3'iember Carlson seconded a motion to approve Project 763, (Duckwood Estates-Street Reltiic:Qvef1 &rti.authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. A vote was taken on the motion. Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Councilmember Blomquist opposed) ...;OkV:R:USINESS PROJECT 673R,RED PINE LA"04 L ASSIr88 TS (PARCEL#10-03600-021-79, OBERG) City Administrator Hedges•pzpvided an overview;.on this item. Director of Public Works Colbert gave a staff report. Mayor Awada invited publit'tt'yrii]r'h" : EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES;MARCH 2,1999 PAGE 7 F John Bannigan,legal counsel representing Jim Oberg, discussed the history of the project. He stated that Mr. Oberg was willing to pq.y.:ijn assessment for eater and sanitary sewer but not for the cost of the street assessment. He said that t:highest and best use of the property is industrial and added that the property does not specially benefitffoin the road assessment and will not increase in value as a result of access to Red Pine Lane. He discussEuc: o �2#fk;eiGnced by Mr.Oberg in attempting to sell his property. ....... .... Mayor Awada stated that it is M'j the City's responsibility to deal with the ultimate market rate of the property or the profit to the developer. She further stated that she has talked to several commercial realtors and it is their opinion and the opinion of the City's appraiser that the property does receive a benefit from access to Red Pine Lane. Councilmember Masin commented that the grading of Red Pine Lane has detracted from the way Mr.Oberg's property can be used. Coig,;irilmemWCarlson stated that the property should not take access off of Red Pine Lane due to rests rted visile*and the proximity of the access to the intersection of Red Pine Lane and TH 3 which create : fety issjte She suggested that access be taken from Gun Club Road. Mayor Awada said that if accessAQ .not.oCcur from Red Pine Lane the property does not benefit. Councilmember Bakken agreed with ivpt cif a@j kbier risc�ai•%concerns for safety. He agreed that if the property owner does not take access e &'L*' 1e'aIY'o'r'2'portion,of the assessment for street and storm should be stayed with the understanding that if access is ever provided to Red Pine Lane,the property owner would be assessed at the then prevailing rates. Councilmember Blomquist concurred with Councilmember Carlson that access should be taken from Gun Club Road. Mayor Awada noted that access to Red Pine Lane can be restricted at the time the property is platted. Councilmember Carlson asked if it w otrll:td9ibie to obtain an easement from the property owner. Director of Public Works Collzei 5t4wij:;fiat it:.-Would be possible.He added that the Council would have the ability to release the epi§eihent in consj&ration for payment of an equivalent assessment for use of the roadway. Mr. Bannigan stated that Mr. Oberg preferred fb xi the industrial zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan designation for his property and would be willing to grant the City an easement restricting access to Red Pine Lane. Councilmember Bakken moved,Councilmember Masin seconded a motion to approve the final assessments for sanitary sewer and water fox.'roject 673R, (Red Pine Lane-Streets and Utilities)as it relates to Parcel 10-03600-021-79(Obex$):a zi.:a*thoriZ,::itk:rertification to Dakota County for collection, with the street assessment to be held e res jvVaCifisSs easement is executed. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Councilmember Carlson inqu:iced about tbg question raised by Mr. Oberg in regard to reducing his lateral benefit. Mayor Awada sug sted tha#:�;ihe street assessment is going to be deleted it was no longer necessary to address that issue;:; NEW BUSINESS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-JEFF AND JILL DIETZ City Administrator Hedges stated € a�} f;tiijnt has verbally requested that consideration of this item be withdrawn. Councilmember Carlson MOM—*,Councilmember BAken seconded a motion to accept the applicant's verbal request to withdr-I-W-N91�ei t}c�zl o..: :*::��em. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES;MARCH 2,1999 PAGE a PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION-CSM LODGING,L.L.C. (TOWNFPLACE SUITES ADDITION) City Administrator Hedges pf& iied an overview on this item. Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report. A representative of the applicaitt-was available for questions. Councilmember Carlson mA-�;'Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to approve a Preliminary Subdivision entitled the"TownePlace Suites Addition" located north of Crestridge Lane between I-35E and Pilot Knob Road upon property currently platted as Lot 1,Block 1,Duckwood Bluff subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall co}i ply witl% ese standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on Februa ?:3,1993:::*:-:-' B1,B4 2. The property shall be platted '''''''"''"" 3. Cross access/parking easements and covenants shall be established between Lots 1 and 2. Such easements shall be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney and recorded with the plat. A vote was taken on the motion. 4ye..'5.:; 3'= CONSIDER INTERIM ORDINANOi ,%GREATER C)wDARVALE AREA/HIGHWAY 13 CORRIDOR City Administrator Hedges pro vided'ai-Wip v v.gn this item. Mayor Awada invited public comment. Vince Kennedy,1415 Lone Oak Road,asked how the determination had been made to expand the moratorium to include the area up to Lone Oak Road and if the Comprehensive Guide Plan subcommittee had suggested that the area be reviewed as:a,potential TIF redevelopment district. Mayor Awada stated that the area had been expanded upon) z%pM0*gnd4Av0 the Comprehensive Guide Plan Subcommittee and that the only actici:pefoi'e' h£ i}iicil's'to determine whether to draft an ordinance for consideration of a moratorium. S ie: urther*10 that the Cedarvale Task Force would make a recommendation as to whether TIF sk4Rld be a.pitFt of this. Mr. Kennedy questioned the affect a' moratorium will have on future devefq went by; 3#ue Cross Blue Shield. City Attorney Sheldon said that �'. e •• an interim ordinance would not ha vi i t. : f eefxgk.' � '.;> , .that has already been given preliminary plat approval. ....:�'�. . � : Nancy Anderson,2113 Wuthering Heights Road,asked for clarification regarding what parcels are undeveloped in this area. A business owner at 1950 Sha concern over the effect of a moratorium on existing businesses. M.C.Gresser,business owno:at 1771 Yankee Doodle Road,questioned why the subcommittee decided to include property in the i%ppretorium. t has;no: ationship to the Cedarvale area. He requested that the Council not incluc7i:W--*:o'.3'2* t:>fi tai pratorium. t EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES;MARCH 2,1999 PAGE 4. Councilmember Blomquist stated that she had not seen the greater Cedarvale Study Area identified before and added that the Cedarvale Task Force members should decide what area is to be included in the moratorium. She questipFted how the determination was made to extend the area to be included in the.moratorium to Lone 04:�c:Aoad. She said that although she is a member of the Comprehensive Guide Plan SubcommA&,:she was not part of the discussion that resulted in a recommendation to create a moratoriusL•':: ,e•..8$j:ftt[fy};t}lat.business owners and residents in the area should have been involved and informbcjiis:todation. Councilmember Carlson asked nut the purpose of including the industrial area in the moratorium. She said that the moratorium could encompass the Cedarvale area.She added that the Cedarvale Task Force should consider this issue and determine the appropriate parameters. Mayor Awada stated that the greater Cedarvale Study Area had already been defined. Councilmember Carlson said she did maxemember the greater area being considered for redevelopment. Councilmember Masin asked tf't►iioper na", cation had been given to the affected properties in this area. Mayor Awada noted that thi3:&ttion beitjg;considered by the Council is to direct the City Attorney to prepare language for a puJilic heaTn&to be held to allow discussion by the public at a future City Council meeting. Councilmembe &iR:sW0*VIk i*commendation by the Comprehensive Guide Plan Subcommittee should have been e6fitsii er2d''6y-&1'Council at a work session. Councilmember Masin moved,Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to discuss the moratorium at a future City Council meeting. Councilmember Carlson indicated that she v;oWd:j e£h support of discussing a moratorium in the study area but not in support of discussing.o:3n*or•'iuht'in the expanded area. Councilmember Blomquist stated that the Cedarvale SttkcAta:etcoiiii4ssed more property than she recalled and said the moratorium is premature at this tihf v:* ayor AwadA noted that the City Council had determined the boundaries of the Cedarvale Study Area-:9 &a•1:mgnths'ago. She suggested that the moratorium be limited to the Cedarvale Study Area and exteiti32t'..'fit:t. &;oratorium on the industrial property could be brought to a Council work session for discussion. CoimciWaber Masin said that additional information should be provided before a determination is made about a moratorium and that notice should be given to property owners in the area. Councilmember Carlson stated that the Cedarvale Study Area moratorium issue should be brought to the first available work session. Mayor Awada concurred. A vote was taken on the moticjK-::::F-yezryor Awada and Councilmembers Blomquist,Carlson and Bakken oppo%Q" Councilmember Carlson mo4a::Counci mber Blomquist seconded a motion to direct discussion on the Cedarvale Study Aim3pin.it.MiA.....7 i :)?i¢arch 16 City Council work session and direction was also given to staff to prepare'ana mAil'fiiydtes'to affected properties within the Cedarvale Study Area. A vote was taken on the motion. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ADi TRi4 #Vt'.AGENDA PETITION REGARDFI 'BLUE GENTIAN CUL-DE-SAC(PROJECT 745) City Administrator Hedges grq#ided an overv} his item. S EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES;MARCH 2,1999 PAGE 10 Councilmember Bakken moved,Councilmember Blomquist seconded a motion to accept the petition and schedule this item for reconsideration at the March 16,1999 City Council meeting. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 SPEd'AL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Councilmember Blomquist mcvtoiiCi#ruei;aE? $akken seconded a motion to schedule a Special City Council meeting for Marcb.�k,1999 at 4:30 p.m. •Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ROUND TABLE City Administrator Hedges commented on the Eagan Healthy Community Initiative and the request being made by the City for staff assistance from America's Promise. Councilmember Masin mentioned that stizattended a budget presentation for ISD 191 and encouraged the public to become info &d abotit:'Rie problems affecting the school district. She suggested that staff obtain brochures AtO a videofape from the NLC regarding the healthy cities initiative. Mayor Awada stated that shQ:WOO#i3 7 :©t)E4f 4 a ci i the date of the next Retreat. Councilmembers Carlson and Blomquist'WncurreCl iMii ' Ttetreat should be rescheduled. Councilmember Blomquist said that the Lone Oak Years history book has been reprinted and she inquired about the possibility of establishing a budget for the History Committee which would be funded by revenues from the books. Councilmember Bakken stated that he would support this request as long as the budget was subject to annual review by the Counci) Councilmember Carlson mov,.e,,--G-eci'rki liiieiit r Bakken seconded a motion to designate all proceeds from the sale of the Lone 0A'-Vea'rs history bgok to the Eagan Historical Committee. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Councilmember Bakken mentioned that he dhia-, ilmember Masin would be attending the National League of Cities Conference March 5 through 9. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m; MLK Date City Clerk If you need these minutes in an alternative form such as large print,Braille,audio tape,etc.,please contact the City of Eagan,3830 Pilot Knob Road,Eagan,MN 55122,(651)6814600,(TDD phone:(651)454-8535). The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all•peysons have equal access to its programs,services,activities, facilities and employment without regard to rffi .;ievl ;:r?°t i;-Pe 191on,national origin,sex,disability,age,sexual orientation,marital status or status with ra�aisl1b'publiC''8s5e. MEMO city of eagan MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 12, 1999 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR MARCH 16, 1999 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE MINUTES After approval is given to the March 16, 1999 City Council agenda and the minutes of the March 2, 1999 regular City Council meeting, the following items are in order for consideration. Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting RECOGNITIONS & PRESENTATIONS A. PRESENTATION OF COMMENDATIONS BY POLICE DEPARTMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: No action required. FACTS: • Police Chief Geagan will be present to recognize two individuals for their courageous efforts and to present them with commendations from the Eagan Police Department. • On October 20, 1998, Chet Parejko witnessed a motor vehicle accident along Lexington Avenue and assisted the driver, who was unconscious and trapped, to safety. • On December 1, 1998, Ryan Naughton assisted the Police Department in apprehending two suspects for motor vehicle theft which had occurred on November 3 near Cole's Salon at Town Centre. • Both Mr. Parejko and Mr. Naughton, along with possibly four family members, will be in attendance at Tuesday's meeting. Kitty Cline, the accident victim assisted by Mr. Parejko, will also be attending. The two officers who were involved plan to attend if they are on duty and available that evening. ATTACHMENTS: 2 • Commendations enclosed on pages ✓ through . p�F+`•M®v<4�•� „ yam �®p�"�w` F� �'rs�v�Y�N�a�f'/..!♦' a �tl�.,A.�p'R'�'�'�`fiwM`k 11'.M�Ar`p��'..♦��6atlrMs'' ♦� ' 'pe PIZZORN 1W ,R e � s rT 00 Ln l� ��►�gr, � � Jam`, h. �' � t►' � � 7! ' 1 � $. o q a ��,�ra . ►. ...ate � �.m _ � �,�. .,��`�. a !Td' sP v+.�ff�.M�',�• s .M°as vs.`6 r';+ wo�M.�tltl'.r��♦�iaos'^W`M tl�e►.a+d�fF,Po�. �,.+�a,►�•ei� rws�� a �, . CRIME aq oq m R _ $ Zon In In R pow. ��lh�F �sw'�'�I► ��r w�4�t��.�► �Ii�I� w �"a��i s ��ir� �-`O�s�?.�r� '�P►fw��wilti!'o®�E?�'s�, i Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA The following items referred to as consent items require one (1)motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items shou d be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brief. A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Part-time Clerical Technician III/Community Development-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Jacqueline Snortheim as a part-time Clerical Technician III in the Community Development Department. Item 2. Part-time Temporary Intern/Recycling-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Karen Reece as a part-time temporary intern for recycling. Item 3. Seasonal Forestry Tech-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Kelly Taylor as a seasonal forestry technician. Item 4. Part-time Seasonal Assistant Skating Instructor-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Kim Tatera as a part-time seasonal assistant skating instruc r at the civic arena. Item 5. Retirement/Chief of Police-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To accept the letter of retirement from Chief of Police Patrick Geagan. s Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting Item 6. Retirement/Superintendent of Recreation-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To accept the letter of retirement from Superintendent of Recreation Dorothy Peterson. ATTACHMENTS: Attached on pages through _� are copies of the letters of retirement notification from Chief of Police Geagan and Superintendent of Recreation Peterson. I i police department PATRICK GEAGAN Chief of Police RICHARD SWANSON Captain Patrol&invesrgation JAMES SEWALD _city of Cagan Captain Administration 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD PATRICIA E.AWADA EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 Mayor PHONE: (651)681-4700 TDD: (651)454-8535 PAUL BAKKEN FAX: (651)681-4738 BEA BLOMQUIST PEGGY A. CARLSON SANDRA A. MASIN March 9, 1999 Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator Tom Hedges E.J. VAN OVERBEKE City Administrator City Clerk Subject: Retirement This letter is to inform you of my intention to retire from the Eagan Police Der'artment. My last day of work will be August 27, 1999. It is with very mixed emotions that, after 30 years as a police officer with the ity of Eagan, I have come to this decision. As much as I look forward to retirement, it is very difficult to leave a position that has afforded me the opportunity to grow professionally and make many treasured friendships. It has truly been an honor to be the Police Chief in what is considered to be one of the finest police departments in the State of Minnesota. The Eagan Police Department's outstanding professional reputation is a credit to the quality of the men and women who serve this community. It would be very difficult not to be successful when blessed with the great people who are part of this organization. I would like to express my appreciation and thanks to the community and the e ected officials who have been so supportive of the police department and me. It would be impossible to name all the people who have been so helpful, but I would be remiss not to recognize you. Tom, you are undoubtedly the finest person I have worked for,both in the City and prior to my coming here. You have allowed me to grow and have always provided me with the friendship and support that contributed to my liking the j b today as much as when I first pinned the badge on so many years ago. Thank you for the opportunity to serve the City of Eagan and the Eagan Police Department. Sincerely, Patrick J. G a / Chief of Police THE LONE OAK TREE . . .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity Employer .. � MEMO _ city of eagan TO: Ken Vraa,Director of Parks and Recreation FROM: Dorothy Peterson, Superintendent of Recreation DATE: March 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Retirement It has been two years since you and I first began to discuss my retirement. It has been important to both of us that my leaving not create an undue burden on the Department. With support from City Administrator Hedges and the City Council, I believe that we are in a position to provide continuity in the Recreation Division and with all community groups with whom I have worked. My career with the City of Eagan began rather inauspiciously in 1974 when then Park Director Barb Schmidt called to inquire whether I would consider teaching tennis for the City. I agreed to do that, and write the Eagan tennis curriculum and teach the other tennis teachers how to teach. Other opportunities soon followed such as periodically organizing adult volleyball programs and open gyms for school age youth. How I came to be a regular employee of the City of Eagan is unique compared to today's standards and requirements. In 1977 I was asked to supervise the summer recreation programs which consisted of Summer In the Park at 6 of the City's 8 parks, Tumbling and Dance at 2 of the 4 elementary schools in the City and tennis lessons at the four parks that had courts. At the end of the summer, I attempted to turn in my evaluations, reports and keys to Park Director Schmidt. She inquired where I was going and wondered whether we had been too busy for her to inform me that the City Council had made the Recreation Programmer position permanent part time. I began planning fall programs! The last 22 years have flown by with new challenges daily it seems. No two years have been alike. As you and I have discussed on several occasions, to be on staff in Eagan during the growth we have experienced has been the opportunity of a lifetime. As fast as you built parks, I strove to fill them with programs. We can both feel pride in what has been accomplished. There is no perfect time to retire. There is no end of the school year or other point of demarcation. I am comfortable, however, with the time-line we have drawn. Following the opening of Cascade Bay I shall continue to work for approximately 20 hours a week for a month to complete projects you have assigned to me and to mentor the new Superintendent of Recreation. If everything goes as planned, July 16, 1999 will be my retirement date. I am confident that we have a strong, capable Recreation staff and that my successor will weigh in with impeccable credentials, ensuring that my retirement will go unnoticed by those our programs serve. I have long appreciated the support Recreation has received from this City Counc l and previous Councils. The history of providing the resources necessary to establish our comprehensive menu of Recreation programs for our residents' diverse interests and ever increasing numbers is to be applauded. This Advisory Parks Commission and previous Commissions have challenge me to think creatively and to listen to the residents of our Community. I appreciate their encouragement and respect. The community organizations with whom I have worked look to our department for support. Our success in this area is not vested in any one individual, rather in our over all approach to Community. Internal support for the scope of Recreation programs we now provide in the City has come from City Administrator, Tom Hedges, our Parks Maintenance Division and our excelle at clerical staff and many many others. I appreciate all of their efforts on our behalf. We have built a strong, enthusiastic, creative Recreation staff. They are resour' eful and self- reliant. They have numerous ideas ready to bring forward for implementation. Ken, we have been quite a team for 19 years. Thank you for providing me with unusual job assignments like the Sussell garage for Clearwater Park, writing Outdoor Recreation grants for land acquisition and the numerous parks development projects for which you ,invited me to participate. It is not usual for Recreation staff in other communities to have this breadth of opportunity. Thank you, most of all for your trust. I wish the Department success and expect tc see continued high quality in every endeavor that carries the name Eagan Parks and Recreation Department. Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting B. EXTENSION FOR RECORDING FINAL SUBDIVISION PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA FOR OAKBROOKE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a 90 day extension of the recording requirement for the Oakbrooke subdivision (located north of Diffley Road and east of I-35E in the SE '/4 of Section 21. FACTS: ➢ The Oakbrooke Final Planned Development was approved by Council action on February 16, 1999. ➢ The terms of Final Planned Development approval stipulate that the subject property must be platted and subsequently recorded by April 16, 1999. ➢ The requested extension is necessary due to an unexpected delay in the preparation of final utility plans. ➢ Approval of the requested 90 day extension would establish a plat recording deadline of July 16, 1999. ATTACHMENTS: (1) ➢ Jim Baruth correspondence dated 3/3/99, page�/ Pulte Homes of Minnesota March 3, 1999 Ms. Marilyn Wucherpfennig Citv of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, ININ 55122-1897 Dear Marilyn: In accordance with discussions with Craig Knudsen,please accept this letter as a fbrmal notice that Pulte Homes Corporation of MN is 'requesting an extension of ninety (90) days to the final plat filing process for the subdivision known as Oakbrooke. This extension of 90 days should continence on April 16, 1999. The final plat approval was granted on February 16,1999. Our engineer, Hedlund Engineering has not received final utility plans from the city's ngineering consultant, Boonestru. Therefore, we cannot apply pipe easements to the final plat Phase I or any outlots that will require pipe easements at the time of final platting. Since the county review process takes several weeks, Pulte Homes doubts that the final plat can be recorded within the 60 day allotment. Please place the Request for Final Plat Extension on the earliest council agenda. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Jim Baruth v Land Department Enclosure 1355 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD SUITE 300 MENDOTA HEIGHTS MINNESOTA 55120-1112 PHONE:(651)452-5200 • FAX:(651 452-5727 • LICENSE#0001371 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council C. AMEND GRADING PLAN FOR TOWN CENTRE 70 TWENTY- SECOND ADDITION- MINI/USA EQUITIES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve a change to the Planned Development regarding the grading plan for Mini/USA Equities for property located west of Denmark Avenue and north of Duckwood Drive, in the NW 1/4 of Section 15. FACTS: • The City approved a Planned Development for this property earlier this winter. The application included site, landscaping, grading, and utility plans, as well as building elevations. • The applicant is proposing some changes to the grading plan for reasons outlined in the attached letter. The changes are described in the memo from Westwood Professional Services, Inc. dated March 4, 1999. The applicant also has prepared some graphic renderings showing the new elevations relative to the adjacent buildings. • The buildings will sit about 4.5 feet higher than originally proposed at the north end of the site, and about 3 feet higher at the south end. A retaining wall will be added to the west side of the property along the service drive. • The 20-foot landscaped setback will be maintained along Denmark Avenue. With the finished grade on the interior of the site at a higher level, the setback area will not bermed, but will slope upwards slightly from the street toward the property. The landscape plan for this area has not changed. ATTACHMENTS: Letters from Mini/IJSA Equities, pages 13 and / Memo from Westwood Professional Service, Inc., page J Graphic Comparison of Elevations, pages and Proposed Amended Grading Plan, page Fax:214-3737238 Feb 12 '99 15:03 F. 02 Cornerstone Development Corporation February 12, 1999 Ms.Pamela Dudziak Associate Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Revised Grading Plan, Cornerstone Self Storage, Denmark Avenue Dear Pam, During the past week it became evident from construction bids obtained fro reputable local general contractors, the cost associated to improving the Denmark site ccording to the previously approved grading plan was cost prohibitive. Alternative ver ions to the grading plan which called for lessening the cubic yards of soil removal did not have a significant reduction in costs due in part to the added cost of additional height in the retaining wall near the west property line. I am painfully aware of the importance in resolving this issue,both from the city and the seller's point of interest. The attached grading plan delivered by Westwood Engineers, shows soil elevations at their approximate current level. Based on this'grading plan, the project becomes economically feasible without changing the previously approved location of storm drainage and utility alignments. Further, since site contour levels are reducedslightly due to earthwork balancing, from an engineering standpoint this plan will not adv sely impact the adjacent properties. Pam, my honest assessment is this issue focuses on the sight or view corridor impact to Kennedy Transmission. If this is the case. then with the improvement of the access road at grade level to Kennedy's site, the view corridor from the south will be enhanced from its current state. To further assist, we pie Ige to focus attention in the placement of landscape to achieve the cities and Kennedy's desired results. I would be most grateful if you will review the attached SA-1 with Mr. Ridley and the engineering department in order for us to know how this issue can be dislwnsed with, either administratively or before the city council. Please give me a call nexi week upon completion of your review. Very truly yours, Russell Miller /3 8235 Douglas Avenuc, Suite 950 19 Dallas,Texas 75225 Z (214) 373-4122 2 Fax: (2 14) 3 7 3-7238 214 3737238 Fax:214-3737238 Mar 11 '99 10:41 P. 02 Cornerstone Development Corporation March 9, 1999 Mr. Mike Ridley Ms, Pamela Dudziak Planning Department City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,Minnesota 55122 Re: Cornerstone Self Storage, Denmark Avenue Dear Mike and Pam, In speaking with Linda Fisher earlier today she commented that some explanation is needed to further describe the landscape area between Denmark and the access drive, especially as it relates to Denmark's view westward into the property. I discussed this matter with our architect, Sally Kaufman, who provides the following explanation. The height of the landscape buffer remains the same as previously approved by the City Council, thus the elevation of tree and plant footings should also remain the same. l hope this brief explanation meets with your satisfaction. However please call me if there is further concern. Very truly yours, Russell Miller 8235 Douglas Avenue, Suite 950 2 Dallas,Texas 75225 ® (214) 373-4122 M Fax: (214) 373-7238 Westwood Professional Services,Inc. MEMORANDUM 0 7599 Anagram Drive 0 104 Marty Drive,#3 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Buffalo, MN 55313 612-937-5150 612-682-2587 FAX 612-937-5822 FAX 612-682-2639 To: Mike Ridley,City of Eagan Pam Dudziak, City of Eagan Ref: WPS No. 98375 From: Steve Swanson,Westwood Date: March 4, 1999 Re: MiniUSA Equities- Storage Facility Grading Revisions MiniUSA is requesting to modify the grading plan for their proposed Cornerstone Self Storage, along Denmark Avenue, in Town Centre,in order to mitigate the amount of existing soil that w uld otherwise have to be hauled away from the site. The existing site plateaus between elevations 905, toward the north end, and 898, toward the south. The proposed finished floor elevations vary from 903.67, on the north end,to 899, on the soulh. The plan previously submitted showed finished floor elevations of 898.29 on the north end to 892.28 on the south end. A modular block retaining wall has been added to the west side of the development, in place of the previously proposed 3:1 slope. The wall is 630' long, and varies in height from 1' to 5'. The storm drainage design flows,and connection point to the existing storm sewer at the southwest corner of the site,remain unchanged. The storm water collection system has been modified to collect surface drainage in 4 catchbasins located along the south curb line. There are no proposed revisions to the previously approved water and sanitary sewer service connections. ® wu i� g Qr I .I D J:: 0 l q r UD w ^i ob Lo D ill D ; , , �l � I � pl Gir i 'i fl I,I 1 o I i 'I NN :N �f w� �6V � S 2 � N rn 2n m 2 m 3� r'o% ��/WLr�1�/� DENMARK MINNESOTA N I rntu `� �inl r f� - Q 0 S1 - 0 II I a Q a A A lS!/ O I �1 II � til u uU 1 1 I 1 1 1 1• L ,4 4' r1i � O li'i Iii ' i I cn En lit C DENMARK AVENUE EAOAN,MINNESOTA x, a or 1 r �� •� - ci°I - �IIiEII - t o: Elk MR MUMMI MI =k�4Nq so ' JIM gill =tgm t INIM 1171 ■fnm ''w�?V`' i \IN =i14' iTiNg; VE `fir ,! 1■ �� z� \�� ■■■e I U(cit• _�1�� bd ��'rl 111 MINE "'��y\� ■■■� 4 `ice/lI IC]� �1`17� � 4?\' '� "'® • ts KI 1111111 ME ME 1131 IPJI al ,-119 1211111d1 \f 4'l\ IEin =Ing ��■I ! in 111110I11-1IIsm IMI j&SL 0 ROOM [MINOR \r,,�■1 1e31 91 ° ti�y��l, 1111 �ItaG girl ISL/ 11!:11 `i IS Id10 41111 N 1111 09 ISM �QCA 4 1 111, ag ■■�l iiil511� E } Y F iy RINGER" f• I Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting D. ACKNOWLEDGE ZONING ON PID # 10-00200-030-32 ARV gGGUM PROPERTY) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To acknowledge the zoning on property on the north side of Blue Gentian F oad (PID # 10-00200-030-32) to be I-1 (Limited Industrial) and R-1 (Single Family). FACTS: • From the earliest zoning map on file (1959) until adoption of the current zoiiing map in 1996, this parcel was assigned two zoning designations. About 2/3`d oft e property was zoned I-1 (Limited Industrial) and 1/3`d was zoned R-1 (Single Family). In 1976 the I-1 portion was rezoned PD but no PD agreement was created to define permitted uses. • In 1996 the City's zoning map was put onto our Geographical Information ystem (GIS). At that time an effort was made to "clean up"mapping errors includ ng multiple designations on the same property. It appears staff made an admin strative decision that the most logical zoning on this property was R-1 given the sun ounding land uses, access limitations, and the fact that a portion of the property was lready zoned R-1. In addition, the lack of a PD agreement made it difficult to precisely determine the intended use for this property. • When the current zoning map was adopted in 1996 the property owner(Maiv Eggum) was not given individual notice of the zoning"cleanup" on his property. T is was an inadvertent oversight. The city code allows the Council to waive individual notification when conducting citywide amendments to the zoning or land us maps; however, there is no record of the Council formally waiving that notification requirement. Accordingly, the City Attorney has suggested that the zoning n the current map (R-1)may not be legitimate and advised the City to acknowledge the original zoning on this property (I-1/R-1). BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS • Past and present zoning maps,pagesla D through e�/ q was s a a /A 0 • 111111 ...... 111111!iii gM 1 I •',I� III III t � _- Ii III 11 ' ��I�Illi ■ wnws �►_. � V WJJUAWLLU0. IIII I A � �tttt :�j+v�.' �_ - n Offil (tlllllll) —M.Fy i. t yeti r IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .r �. � ♦ 'ac w� ��' '� •' ' ': c div}�� +rev. 1+* i � �tq� -. �eaH�k3�- �ti � •� �'" K-'.3 ?— y y .� ie 'Sre�.ws.5i i'��e i�.f�-a.�[ret" -�� t3''�iy' c ��".'� t _ m -*• r__-ya ;' xs K.. :a. "x� .�et' .�` a`a�yw - • , ��".-..jG�'�it5 L�. �i I. ♦ � � � tis..... 1x `�" 43w X ds��1"fv' ��(}E;y, `"�� "'y'":S. -500 s444 z. �.r .d� -'d t`• �:. i. • l .y ^1T 1��tf�•�Y��";��.t t �uY -sA�fL+i .l� ".j7A y,rf ,��^T r roa R fi � �,rf � _ .� �'.FI i!.ldd.+y� -c:� �'a r<—i..•.ySsO rYy�ij,.r �� T� �a4�t• A� ��• 4 L'' 1 iT.e',.aL {.y; �x� .r� ,�E r.Vea`�} a;w � �.lK �.�i�?� p': h,��r rr44 tN•jr;7r...s�F,Ph'�'-r.-syr,,. y,,.;sp,.ti�.g +iae.. a Nw�K, y. 5 '�-� ice.i_ �..•�r'�"?; � s�..t � � '�� S 3� �k. -� � .* lay. , � ♦�r s€� "�: -r4 Tit �oil„� i� .,��.'1i�. Cl '�J L.� �ryt? �W�}''�Vr,SLS'� o•:`.' j x`�,� � � ME -� _+1�,�4-. a. ti.�`V•-` .raY•y} �� `3 . 'x'�•LIQmt —m7 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting E. PROCLAMATION BURNSVILLE/EAGAN COMMUNITY TELEVISION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DAY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt a proclamation recognizing March 26, 1999 as Burnsville/Eagan Community Television Volunteer Appreciation Day. FACTS: • The Burnsville/Eagan Telecommunications Commission, in cooperation with Burnsville/Eagan Community Television and the cities of Burnsville and Eagan, have cooperated in recent years to hold a public access volunteer appreciation event to recognize those individuals involved in the production of community television. • This year, the event is scheduled for Friday evening, March 26 at Benchwarmer Bob's in Burnsville. Invitations have been forwarded to the City Council under separate cover. ATTACHMENTS: • Proclamation enclosed on page c�3 . a �. PROCLAMATION BURNSVILLE/EAGAN COMMUNITY TELEVISION VOLUNT ER APPRECIATION DAY WHEREAS, from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1998, 458 citizens' volunteered 2,541 times which totaled more than ten thousand hours of their ti e and energy to provide community television programming to the communities of Burnsville and Eagan, resulting in 499 hours of original programming and 473 new productions, and WHEREAS, these programs provide the opportunity for the citizens o Burnsville and Eagan to view programs for and about their communities, whic otherwise would not be provided, and WHEREAS,the Burnsville/Eagan Community Television volunteer pr ducers and their crews have established Burnsville/Eagan Community Television as a premier community television institution, having received over 20 state and national awards, and WHEREAS,these volunteers receive no compensation for their time, energy and production skills, other than the occasional thank you by appreciative viewers and citizens, and WHEREAS,the Burnsville/Eagan Telecommunications Commission, i cooperation with Burnsville/Eagan Community Television and the cities of Burnsville and Eagan, have decided to demonstrate their appreciation by honoring all the 1998 community television volunteers, with the Burnsville/Eagan Community Television Volunteer Appreciation Event on March 26, 1999. NOW THEREFORE, I, Patricia E. Awada, Mayor of the City of Eagan, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim Friday, March 26, 1999 as BURNSVILLE/EAGAN COMMUNITY TELEVISION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DAY in Eagan, Minnesota. Proclaimed this 16`h day of March, 1999. Patricia E. Awada a.� Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting F. APPROVE EXTENSION OF METER READING SERVICES CONTRACT The City has not received the proposal requested from RMS Services, Inc. In the event a proposal is received late today or early Monday it will be forwarded with the Administrative Agenda. If it is not received, the agenda item will need to be continued. C� Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 G. CONTRACT 98-24,BLUE WATER ROAD STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To receive the bids for Contract 98-24 (Blue Water Road — Street and Utility Improvements), award the contract to Northdale Construction, fa the Base Bid in the amount of $637,588.34, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • On August 18, 1998, the City Council authorized the construction of the stree s and utilities on Blue Gentian Road and Blue Water Road and directed the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. • On February 16, the Council approved plans and authorized the advertisement for solicitation of competitive bids. At 10:30 a.m. on March 11, formal bids were received f r this project. A copy of the bid tabulation will be enclosed with the Additional Information. • All bids have been reviewed for compliance with the bid specifications and ac uracy on unit price extensions and arithmetic. The low bid from Northdale Construction has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order for favorable Council actin. ATTACHMENTS: • Bid Recommendation, to be distributed with the Administrative Agenda. Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 H PROJECT 734 TOWN CENTRE DRIVE 100—SIDEWALK— FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ACTION FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: Receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 734 (Town Centre Drive 100 — Sidewalk) and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 20, 1999. FACTS: • Project 734 provided for the construction of concrete sidewalk to complete the trail system on Town Centre Drive, from Yankee Doodle Road to Lexington Avenue and on O'Leary Lane, from Town Centre Drive to Yankee Doodle Road. • This project, constructed under Contract 98-06, has been completed, all costs tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. • This roll is now being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present the final costs to be levied against the benefited properties. a6 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting I AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT FOR REMOVAL OF BILLBOARD SIGN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To direct the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with Duke Realty f Dr purposes of removal of a billboard sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Silver Bell Commons Addition. FACTS: • The property in question that is currently under development contains off-premise billboard sign. The Eagan City Sign Code requires removal of any off-preniise sign upon development of the parcel on which it is located. • The site plan approved by the City in connection with the building permit for the property improvement included a notation that the off-premise sign was to be removed. Subsequently, a controversy has arisen between the owners of the property and the off-premise sign. • In order to facilitate completion of the facility and issuance of a Certificate f Occupancy, City staff has negotiated with Duke Realty to insure removal of the billboard sign upon expiration of the existing lease (August 6, 2003). As part of their agreement Duke will be required to post a bond to cover the cost of removing the sign, restoring the property, and a guarantee that within 45 days following expiration of the lease, the sign will b removed and the area will be restored in accordance with the final site plan dated September 9, 1998. • This negotiated agreement will insure the removal of the sign and settle the dispute between Duke and the owner of the off-premise sign. ATTACHMENTS: (2) Area Map, page�. '10/ Draft Agreement,pages jP1 L through 3 F F F Location Map v PM � p �► o11�i� � � �_�.�►1��C-'soy., o� as��'s7'`y�,LQ�Er Q.� C"ZL'C"� V44 »> V © '' x`70 4 C�GQ31000:GG ttt ■I I:� �G - - � f7 c t �■ tsr♦� - � O ` -=I !►� Aw p� �; Q7�: j d IML �� 47►�w Q:3?�D n�>o�ir 4[� e _ t1�4 ��iAt� •b,a`�'f�`�'!Ja- tr■ Ri A �� A� ccv.+, ♦a ��1C is iia vs� ` ► `d� _ � �� i � uta `�`��:r V'+��fr '�� nn r wry t� at1 �L►�•� t��4�aJ A�1� rc�4`'�:�„b a� �� a a esu ao 0�!� ��' tFl►•�� - a■ 00 o S ��i;� ° :•�-�`_� crTMec pi' .. . .. :.. .. :.. Development/Developer: Dallas Development 2nd Addition Application: Planned Development Amendment . . *City of Eagan c2oa + 612 432 37eO SENT BY: 3- 9-99 : 15:15 SEVERSON SHELDON-a 651 681 4694,# 2/ 4 AGREEMENT REGARDING PYLON SIGN LOCATED ON LOT ONE (1),BLOCK ONE (1), SILVER BELL COMMONS THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of March, 1999, by DIJY.E REALTY INVESTMENTS, INC., a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter "Duke"), in favor of the CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"). WHEREAS, Duke is the fee owner of Lot One (1), Block One (1), Silver Bell Commons (hereinafter the "Property"), and WHEREAS, in September of 1998, Duke requested the City to approve Uld the City did approve Site Plan for the construction of improvements to the Property; and WHEREAS, Chapter 4 of the Eagan City Code requires the removal of any off premise sign, as defined therein, prior to the City's issuance of a building permit for the c nstruction cif a structure upon the property upon which an off-premise sign is located; and WffEREAS, an off-premise sign is currently located on the Property; and WHEREAS, the Site Plan approved by the City in connection with the improvement of the Property included the notation that the off-premise sign was to be removed; and WHEREAS, a controversy has arisen between the owner of the Property and the owner of the of-premise sign; and WHEREAS, the City and Duke have negotiated an agreement which would settle the dispute with the owner of the off-premise sign and assist the City in its goal of reducing the number of off-premise signs within the City; and WHEREAS, the owner of the off'premise sign has an existing Lease n the Property which Lease expires on August 6, 2003; and WHEREAS, this agreement is made for the purposes of memorializing the terns and conditions of the negotiated agreement between Duke and the City. C� ? 612 432 3780 SENT BY: 3- 9-99 ; 13:15 SEVERSON SHELDON- 651 681 4694:# 3/ 4 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, Duke an th�' x}te as follows: I. Duke shall deposit the sum of $ with the City to secure the removal of the off-premise sign upon the expiration of the Lease. 2. Within forty-five (45) days following the expiration of the Lease, Duke shall remove or cause to be removed the off-premise sign and to have the area restored in accordance with the final Site Plan dated September 9, 1998 submitted by Duke for the Property. 3. Following removal of the off-premise sign and restoration of the Property, the City shall upon request from Duke, release the security. 4. In the event the off-premise sign is not removed in accordance with this Agreement, the City may but with no obligation to do so, enter upon the Property and remove the sign and restore the premises. The City may use all or a portion of the security to pay for any cost it incurs. The City will remit to Duke any unused funds held for the purposes herein. In the event the City's cost exceeds the amount deposited by Duke in accordance herewith, Duke hereby agrees that the amount by which the City's cost exceeds the deposit may be assessed against the Property,and Duke waives all rights to notice and hearing and further waives its right to appeal the assessment as provided for under Minn. Stat. §429.081. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. DUKE REALTY TNVESTMENTS, INC., CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota a Minnesota corporation municipal corporation By: _ By: Patricia E. Awada Its: -_ Its: Mayor By: E. J. VanOverbeke Its: City Clerk ,30 612 432 3780 SENT BY: 3- 9-99 : 15:15 SEVERSON SHELDON 651 681 4694:# 4/ 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) r r ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this day of , 1999, before me a Nota Public within and for said County, personally appeared to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he/she is the _ of Duke Realty Investments, Tne., the corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said _ .. acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of the corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this day of , 1999, before me a Notm-y Pu lic within and for said County, personally appeared PATRICIA E. AWADA and E.J. VanOVE EKE to inc personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing ij strwnent, and that the seal affixed on behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municip ality. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: SEVERSON, SHELDON, DOUGHERTY & MOLENDA, P.A. 7300 West 147th Street, Suite 600 Apple Valley, AIN 55124 (612)432-3136 MGD/wkt (206-15957 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 J PROJECT 775}ADVENT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH SANITARY SEWER—EXTENSION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive a petition and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 775 (Advent United Methodist Church—Sanitary Sewer Extension). FACTS: • Advent United Methodist Church is proposing an addition to the church building and an expansion of the existing parking lot on property located northwest of the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Northview Park Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 22. • Sara Hoy Kelzenberg, RB Architects, acting as the Church's representative has petitioned the City for the extension of sanitary sewer to the southern limits of the Church's property. • The church building is currently connected to the public sanitary sewer at a manhole on the north property line(from Westbury Addition). • On February 18, 1986, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for Advent United Methodist Church. One of the conditions of the plat approval was an agreement regarding the future extension of the sanitary sewer to the south property line. The Church has waived its right to object to the assessment,which will be levied solely against the Church property. • The extension of the sanitary sewer will provide public sewer for the undeveloped parcels south of the church, including Patrick Eagan Park. • Staff is requesting Council authorization to prepare a detailed feasibility report to evaluate the proposed scope, cost, schedule and method of financing the construction of the petitioned utility improvement. ATTACHMENTS: • Location map, page . • Site map, page . 3c Q 3-12-99 W x > zU �� CSR ��4, �S.C/ �r MUELLER _ Y FARM P FISH a KOLSTAD MOURNING WAY ST, D LN. LN. DOVE CT. 3 U FISH K DENMARK HU LEY 6 CT. PARK W DENMARK E CARDINAL H RO TR. E. ,r, OR � DE �' G• 88 Cr 0 w r o �- DE UF 79 z BRIAR R K 0. ONY� 8S W T. Z ` O Y z EERCLIFF a QP TY HA I AVER ly � + x ROCKY LN. RESTVIEW zo reugr�O LN. 2 V a I TI N RO TR ON* ESTSURY C OEERRIDGE J NORTHVIPARK CT. RD DEERWOOO DRIVE CARTHY ti 23 HOSFO HILLS DR. 9 DR. N RTWEW boa BERRY PATCR z PK � c`I`�ct PARK W 2 1 3 45 ICK �+ THVIEW BERRY PARK ; �� PR JECT LOCATION IKr{OLl s J C' •C,pp TR. z 66 _ (CO. R0. 30) � 1 ° N.T QUI LEY y W LEXINGTON-DIFFLEYxLAK _ T ICK W ATHLETIC FACILITY t C E O RCT ON y 42 Z cLAKE W DF OWER CT 9 CLEOME LN.7 PARK Z wool* ma J G z W AQ_RlS E. > W C SMO LN. LAKE a. a z c z Ww" o �g�- GOAT z z CARLSON oo C ~ Wa " o c7� Hill s UrLN. V,ItE PARK Il_ 91 o UN- R c- LN WALN HILL G:PROJ_ORAWNGS �3 ADVENT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH Figure SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION City of Eagan LOCATION MAP I ",NN1 _ ECT TO M MH ��CGRE-Dk4l. GROUT SE AI �— I140UR� 8 REFORM CHANNEL '" 8087 66 Preliminary Civil Plan i not to scale F seo � II 2 MN—t R.89U 1 I.- vc PHASE I EXISTING I FFE 891.59 BUILDING I I FFE 891.59 t p �t NEW _1 AN 887.5 = Bi 62 b IO F 1 1.0 tR_ FE 1 FE � I f CB-2A t R.886.46 Ct 8' VC 5 U8 6 76 0� 1 pyyD DATR.A CB-} 1-887. 5 .ML = 881 O 1.M7. ~ HWL = 88.0 FE 1. � CB AdtBe Ca R 86.6 584 2. Ct / 1R AIL HEAD H_11 R.667.J .679.8 4 _ CI O R.887 7 N876 7 (VOILE TV) COURT ALI 0 I � � ,Q g ry 6 8 R�C STUB ,. i 1 i.67 TEEN CENTER Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 City Council Meeting K. APPROVE Change Order #6, Cascade Bay FOR COUNCIL ACTION: To approve Change Order #6 for Cascade Bay in the amount of$9,965.00. FACTS: • Delete wall depth markers at leisure pool and lazy river. The State Health Department requires depth markers on the pool deck at various intervals along the lazy river and leisure pool. Markers were also specified on the inside pool wall, which is required in some jurisdictions. Neither Minnesota nor Dakota County require them, therefore have been deleted ($1,982.00) • As was reported in last month's change order, an error was made in the reading of the size of pool heaters specified and the mechanical engineer carried this error over in the design and specifications for the flue and make up air. The cost to correct: • the size of the exhaust flue: ,216.00 • the size of the air intake: 1 1184.00 • core drill 8 holes in east wall for venting of the above: ,100.00 • Provide temporary heat enclosure for pool decking to Kellington Construction to allow for work on pool deck drains and deck by leisure pool .447-00 Total Change Order $9/965.00 CONCERNS: None ATTACHMENTS: None _3S� Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 City Council Meeting L. AWARD work for Cascade Bay entrance gate FOR COUNCIL ACTION: To authorize hiring D.G. Welding to complete the ornamental iron entrance gate for Cascade Bay. BACKGROUND: The ornamental iron entrance gate was part of the fence bid package for enclosing the aquatic facility. No bids were received for this work when the bids were originally opened last spring. After discussions with contractors, most fence installers did not want the added responsibility of the gate as it was proposed. Consequently, this bid package was broken into two parts; the fence enclosure (which was previously awarded) and the entrance gate. Bid packages were sent to several area suppliers, however, DG Welding in Eagan was the only bidder. After review, this favorable bid is being recommended for approval. FACTS: • No bids were received for a combined fence and gate bid package in the spring. • Separates bid documents were assembled for the fencing and the gate enclosure. • The bid for the fence work was approved last year in the amount of$31,880. • The total amount estimated for the gate and fence bid was $70,000. • Only one bid was received in the amount of$11,940. • After review, it was determined that despite the single bid, this amount was within the projected cost for this work. CONCERNS: None ATTACHMENTS: None 26 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 City Council Meeting i M. AUTHORIZE submission of application for MRAC grant FOR COUNCIL ACTION: To authorize application of a grant from the Metropolitan Regional Arts ouncil (MRAC) for youth development programs in the amount of$3,000. FACTS: • The MRAC is one of 11 regional arts councils designated by the State of Minnesota"to make final decisions on the use of legislative appropriations for local/regional arts development'. • MRAC is responsible for assessing the needs of the 7-county metro a ea and with planning and administering programs and services based on assessment. • Grants of up to$3,000 are offered for arts activities of community based, smaller and newly formed groups and first-time initiatives. • Youth development has placed an emphasis on programming for at risk and underserved youth living in multi-housing unit complexes and isolated neighborhoods. • The grant would be used to plan and implement a tailor made, art camp integrating nature and art for these youth to be held at the Caponi A t Park. CONCERNS: None ATTACHMENTS: Grant Cover Sheet - R3 a C Certification to be executed by the Mayor and City Clerk / 3 Project budget�� COVER PAGE Check one: D Arts Activites Support mall Grants/Commmity Arts Amount of Request: $3,000 Project Start Date: 6/28/99 Total Project Cost: $8,935 Project End Date: 7/18/99 Applicant Group: City of Eagan Parks and Recreation D History of arts programming D No history of arts programming as a group Address: 3830 Pilot Knob Road City, State,Zip: Eagan,MN 55123 County: Dakota Project Director: Loudi Rivamonte Title: Youth Development Coordinator Phone: (w) 651- 681-4667 (h) 651-645-9566 (fax) 651-681-4612 MN House District: 30 A M4c r3 U.S. Congressional District: 0 (District numbers are required. Call House Information at 651-296-2146 or visit the following website at httr):/hvww.I)ioneerplanet.com/archives/capital/index.htmfor assistance) If your group is not using a fiscal agent,this section will be blank: Fiscal Agent: City of Eagan Address: 3830 Pilot Knob Road City, State,Zip: Eagan,MN 55123 Contact Person: Loudi Rivamonte Phone(w): 651-681-4667 (h) 651-645-9566 (fax) 651-681-4612 Project Summary: Describe your project in fewer than 50 words. Youth Development,a component of the City of Eagan's Parks and Recreation Department has placed an emphasis on programming for at risk and underserved youth living in multi-housing unit complexes and isolated neighborhoods. The grant would be used to plan and implement a tailor made, art camp integrating nature and art for these youth to be held at the Caponi Art Park. Applicant Group: CERTIFICATION ADA ACCESS PLAN Our group has: ❑ An ADA access plan approved by our board of directors ❑ Begun ADA access planning and expects a plan to be approved by the board of directors by the following month/year: ❑ No ADA access plan CERTIFICATION SIGNATURES We, the undersigned, certify that our board of directors supports the project as described in this application and that all the information in the attached application is true and correct to the best of our knowledge. Further, we resolve to carry out the project as it is de- scribed in the attached application if funding is awarded by MRAC. Two signatures from members of your group are required. One signer must be a boardadvisory officer. print name of boord/advisory officer print name of boord/odvisory member or project director boord/od visory officer signature boord/advisory member or project director signot ire boord/advisory officer title boord/odvisory member or project director titie dote signed dote signed c„3 9 23 Applicant Group: PROJECT BUDGEVEXPENSES Estimated Expenses Cash In-kind Explanatory Notes Goods and (For eligible RE: Youth Development Staff services requiring expenses cash payment. See page 8.) 1. Personnel(employee or contract) Please break down by individual position. Indicate number of hours of full-time equivalent. a. Artistic 3 artists x 24 hours x$25 $1,800 2 artists x 14 hours x$25 700 b. Administrative&other personnel Youth Dev Coord.60 hours x$20 $1,200 Cheryl Caponi 15 hours x$12 180 Caponi Prog. Coord. 10 hours x$10 100 c. Employee benefits&payroll taxes 2. Supplies 135 youth x$10 each 625 725 3. Printing& postage Flyers 500 x.5 25 4. Space&equipment rental Caponi Art Park Site Rental 2wks x$500.00 1,000 5. Transportation Bus x 8 days 900 6. ADA-related costs(e.g.,sign language interpreter,translator, signage,and printing) 7. Other(explain)( P lain ex (Youth Development Staff) 5 staff x 8 hours x 4 days x$7.50 1,200 4 staff x 4 hours x 4 days x$7.50 480 8. SUBTOTAL A.$5,025 B. $3,910 9. TOTAL EXPENSES(Add lines 8A& 8B) $8,935 �D Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting N. COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER APPLICATOR LICENSE RENEWAL FOR MINNESOTA TURF CARE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a commercial fertilizer applicator license for Minnesota Turf Care C s presented. FACTS: • The City is in receipt of a fertilizer applicator license from Minnesota Turf are out of Lakeville, Minnesota. • The application has been reviewed by staff and is in order for consideration by the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: • Application enclosed without page number. ZL 71 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 A. PROJECT 740, SILVER BELL ROAD STREET RECONSTRUCTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 740 (Silver Bell Road— Street Reconstruction) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed final plans and specifications. FACTS: • Silver Bell Road (Hwy. 13 to Kennebec Drive) was originally constructed in 1981 and widened in 1987. The street provides access to commercial properties northeast of the interchange of TH 77 and TH 13. • The reconstruction of the street was programmed for 1998 in the City's 5-Year CIP (1998- 2002). • On March 17, 1998, the City Council authorized staff to prepare a fe sibility report addressing the scope, cost, schedule and financing of street rehabilitation impr vements. • On April 21, 1998, the City Council canceled the feasibility report for Project 740 due to the significant cost of the proposed improvements and staff's recommendation t iat preparatory maintenance should extend the usefulness of the existing street and the vale of the initial investment. • Further inspection by staff in the summer of 1998 indicated preparatory mai tenance would not be cost effective. • On February 16, 1999, the feasibility report for Project 740 was again press ted to the City Council and a Public Hearing was scheduled for March 16 to formally present and discuss the merits of this project with the affected property owners. • An informational meeting was held on March 9, at 4:30 p.m. at City Hall. Of the 2 properties proposed to be assessed,no one attended the informational meeting. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility Report, pages U. through . t � City of Eagan Report for Silver Bell Road Trunk Highway 13 to Kennebec Drive Street Improvements City Project No. 740 Eagan, Minnesota February, 1999 q-3 Alboh.. city of eagan PATRICIA E AWADA Mayor February 16, 1999 PAUL BAKKEN BEA BLOMQUIST Honorable Mayor and City Council PEGGY A.CARLSON SANDRA A. City of Eagan Council Memberstern 3830 Pilot Knob Road THOMAS HEDGES Eagan, MN 55122 City Administrotcr E.J. VAN OVERBEKE RE: Silver Bell Road Street Improvement Report City Clerk City Project No. 740 Dear Mayor and City Council: Attached is our report for Silver Bell Road Street Improvement, City Project No. 740. The report presents and discusses the proposed improvements and includes a cost estimate and preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council at your convenience to review and discuss the contents of this report. Sincerely, John P. Gorder Development/Design Engineer I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. koP. Gorder Date: Reg. No. 22813 Reviewed By: Z—/6 Dept. of Public Wor Date Reviewed By: 3 Fi a Dept. Date MAINTENANCE FACILITY MUNICIPAL CENTER THE LONE OAK TREE 3501 COACHMAN POINT 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 EAGAN,MINNESOTA 55122-1897 PHONE (651)681-4300 PHONE(651)681-4600 Equal Opportunity Employer FAX (t51)681-4360 FAX (651)681-4612 TDD 1651)454-8535 rnn iti5t145d-8535 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal/Certification Table of Contents Page Introduction .............................................................................. 1 Scope ........................................................................................ 2 Feasibilityand Recommendations .................................................... 2 StreetEvaluation ......................................................................... 3 ProposedImprovements ................................................................ 3 Easements/Permits ....................................................................... 4 CostEstimate .............................................................................. 4 StreetReconstruction ............................................................... 4 Assessments ............................................................................... 5 StreetReconstruction ...... ..................................................... 5 Commercial.......................................................................... 5 AssessmentFinancing Options ........................................................ 6 RevenueSource ........................................................................... 6 ProjectSchedule .......................................................................... 7 TJ LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix C Figures - 1 Location Map - 2 Street Improvement/Assessment Area Map - 3 Typical Section—Reconstruction 76 February 1999 Street Improvement Report Silver Bell Road Eagan, Minnesota Introduction As a part of Eagan's Pavement Maintenance Program, (PMP), the City evaluates streets within the community throughout their life cycle and implements appropriate maintenance strategies. In 1989, a Pavement Management System (PMS) was developed that allowed the City to evaluate the condition of the existing pavement surface for all the streets on a routine basis and schedule timely maintenance. A Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for street rehabilitation was developed from this information. Silver Bell Road, between Trunk Highway 13 (TH 13) and Kennebec Drive, has been identified for street reconstruction improvements in 1999. Figure 1, located in the back of this report, illustrates the project location. MnDOT constructed silver Bell Road, north of TH-13, to a width of 44 feet (between the face of curbs) in 1981 to accommodate the new TH- 13 re-alignment at Silver Bell Road. As part of the Dallas Second Addition in 1987, this section of street was widened to 48 feet (between the face of curbs) under City Project No. 495. Silver Bell Road is a Municipal State Aid Roadway (Route#108). �� 1 The original construction by MnDOT included full-depth bituminous pavement, 8" thick, constructed directly on the subgrade with no aggregate base between the subgrade and the pavement. This type of construction did not allow moisture to freely drain away from the pavement, thereby causing the pavement to deteriorate at a faster rate due to its increased susceptibility to freeze/ thaw cycles. This full- depth pavement was an acceptable method at the time of construction of this section of Silver Bell Road in 1981. The existing pavement has deteriorated to a point where reconstruction of the bituminous pavement is the only feasible method of repair for this portion of Silver Bell Road. Recent traffic counts for Silver Bell Road in this area indicate approximately 5,700 vehicles per day (two-way count), with a considerable amount this being truck traffic. The street in this project has been rated many times since 1989 and the field data gathered indicates what maintenance strategies are appropriate. Timely maintenance work, such as bituminous milling and patching, crack sealing and seal coating have occurred at appropriate intervals during the life of these pavements. The City of Eagan's maintenance records indicate that this street was last seal coated in 1992. Scope This project provides for reconstructing approximately 660 feet of Silver Bell Road, between Trunk Highway 13 and Kennebec Drive. Figure 2 illustrates the project area. Also included is the replacement of traffic signal loop detectors near Highway 13, and adjustment and replacement of sanitary/storm sewer manhole castings. Feasibility and Recommendations This project is necessary to create a safer driving surface, increase rideability and improve drainage. This project is cost effective in that the proposed improvement will increase the property values of adjacent properties, reduce maintenance and facilitate continued economic growth in the area. �� 2 This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Goals and Objectives established in the City's Pavement Maintenance Program. This project is in accordance with the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (1998— 2002) for the City of Eagan. It is recommended that the project be combined with the Trunk Highway 13 divided 4-lane improvements (Project 709R) as one contract. Proposed Improvements The proposed street improvements are shown on Figure 3. As mentioned previously, the existing street section on Silver Bell Road does not include any gravel aggregate base material. The street reconstruction proposed includes removal of the entire existing bituminous surface and the placement of 6" of granular material base, 12" aggregate base and 4 '/z " of bituminous pavement (MnDOT granular equivalent = 24"). Subgrade drain tile at the street's low point is proposed to enhance drainage. Damaged curb and gutter will be replaced if severely cracked, spalled, or settled. It is estimated that 10 percent of the existing concrete curb and gutter will have to be replaced. The City's Utility Maintenance Department has evaluated the existing sewer and water distribution systems and has determined that they are in good working order and no major repairs or improvements are necessary. Easement/Permits All work will be in the public right-of-way. No additional easements will be necessary. It is anticipated that a permit will be required from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MN/DOT) for the replacement of a traffic signal loop detector at the intersection with TH 13 as part of the reconstruction project. � � 3 Cost Estimate Detailed cost estimates are located in Appendix A. The estimates are based on anticipated 1999 construction costs and include a 10 percent contingency and indirect costs of 30 percent, which include legal, administration, engineering, and bond interest. A summary of the costs is as follows: Street Reconstruction ♦ Bituminous Street Reconstruction................................................$ 116,150 ♦ Repair Curb & Gutter L__L870 Total..........................$120,020 �O 4 Assessments Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted properties for the total improvement with costs allocated internally in accordance with the City of Eagan's current Assessment Policy. All assessments will be revised based on final costs. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B. Street Reconstruction Commercial Assessed Ratio City Bituminous Streeet Recon. 100% 0% Repair Concrete Curb & Gutter 0% 1000/0 All the properties shown on Figure 2 having frontage along the improved streets are proposed to be assessed. CommerciaUIndustrial The commercial property along Silver Bell Road will be assessed on a front-foot basis. The following calculations were used to determine the assessment rates: 1) $116,150 (Bituminous Street Reconstruction Cost) x 100%=$116,150 2) $116,150 (Total CommerciaUIndust. Assessment) _ $94.97/ F.F. 1,223 (Frontage of CommerciaUIndust.) S� 5 Assessment Financing Options The property owner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the full assessment or include the assessment in with their property tax statement. If the assessment is included with the property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over fifteen years with the interest rate determined by the results of the bond sale used to finance the improvements. Revenue Source A summary of revenue sources is listed below: Project Property City Cost Assessment Contribution Bituminous Recon. $116,150 $116,150 -$0- Repair Curb & Gutter $3,870 -$0- ($3,870) Total $120,020 $116,150 ($3,870) The City's Major Street Fund will finance the estimated project deficit of$3,870. Sa 6 Project Schedule Present Feasibility Report to City CounciV Order Public Hearing ....................................... ...Feb. 16, 1999 Public Hearing ................................................March 16, 1999 Approve Plans and Specifications ................................May, 1999 Award Contract .....................................................June, 1999 Project Completion ............................................October, 1999 Final Cost Report .............................................February, 2000 Final Assessment Hearing.......................................Spring, 2000 First Payment Due with Property Tax Statement ...............May 2001 S3 7 Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Silver Bell Road Reconstruction City Project No. 740 L Bituminous Street Reconstruction Est. Unit Est. Item Unit Qty. Price Cost Mobilization L.S. 1 $2,000 $2,000 Remove Bituminous Pavement 8"-10" S.Y. 31400 4.00 $13,600 Common Excation C.Y. 1,500 $6.00 $9,000 Class 5 Aggregate Base Ton 2,550 $8.00 $20,400 Type 31 Base Course Mix Ton 640 $24.00 $15,360 Select Granular Borrow C.Y. 650 $8.00 $5,200 Type 41 Wear Course Mix Ton 320 $26.00 $8,320 Adjust Valve Box Each 2 $125.00 $250 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal. 170 $1.75 $300 Adjust Frame& Ring Casting .H. Each 1 $200.00 $200 Traffic Control L.S. 1 $3000.00 $3 000 Pavement Striping L.S. 1 $2,000 $2,000 Replace Traffic Signal L )op Detectors L.S. 1 $600 $600 4" HDPE Drain Tile L.F. 100 $10.00 $1,000 Subtotal $81,230 + 10% Contingencies 8,120 Subtotal $89,350 + 30% Indirect Costs $26,800 Total 1116,150 II. Repair Concrete Curb & Gutter Est. Unit Est. Item Unit Qty. Price Cost Remove Conc. Curb & Gutter L.F. 130 $5 $650 B618 Conc. Curb & Gutter L.F. 130 $12 $1,560 Topsoil Borrow C.Y. 10 $8 $180 Sodding S.Y. 80 $4 $320 Subtotal $2,710 + 10% Contingencies $270 Subtotal $2,980 + 30%Indirect Costs $890 Tatsl' 53,870;! Total Project Cost $120,020 Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll Silver Bell Road Reconstruction Project City Project No. 740 Front Ratel Total Address P.I.N. Footage F.F. Assessment Commercial Dallas Development 1" Addition Block 1 Lot 1 2020 Silver Bell Road 10-19600-010-01 665 $94.97 $63,155 Silver Bell Commons Block 1 Lot 1 2015 Silver Bell Road 10-68200-010-01 558 $94.97 $52,995 Total Assessments $116,150 OTEASIBIUNREPORTS1998/Silver Bell Road S,� I i R��ER Fn NO SCALE I x*k i Q� I II i PROJECT LOCATION i I I I I_. SILVER SILVER BELL RD.ol -- s i o O DIFFLEY RD. o ti --� DIFFI ROAD tv -- I I i SSI G:Project Drowing s/740S_8ELL/740 LOCATION Silver Bell Road Figure Street Reconstruction Mar. 2, 1999 CITY OF EAGAN Project 740 . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .*.'.'.*.*.* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Silver Bell Commons.'....*'-'*', . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Block . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .............................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .::: . . . . . ::. . . . . .: :::::::::.:.a::::::: ::::::::.::' .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cleo . . . . peve�ogn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\_0. . . . ............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F\n M Street improvement Area LNJ FEB. 8, 1999 Assessable Properties G:Pro jectDrowin gs/7 40S—BELL/7 40ASSESS Silver Bell Road Figure Street improvement / Assessment Area 2 rtTy r)F FAGAN Project 740 80' ROW 48' TYPICAL MIN. 0.02'/FT. MIN. 0.02'/FT. EX. 8618 CURB 8" EXISTING BITUMINOUS BASE EXISTING SUBGRADE EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION 80' ROW 48' TYPICAL MIN. 0.02'/FT. MIN. 0.02'/FT. 0 REPLACE EX. B618 CURB & GUTTER AS NECESSARY 4" PE DRAIN PIPE 11/2'TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE AS NECESSARY (TYP.) BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 3" TYPE 31 BASE COURSE 12" Cl. AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED 6' SELECT GRANULAR BORROW GRANULAR SUBGRADE— VARIABLE BITUMINOUS STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROPOS ICAL SECTION G:ProjectDrawings/740XSEC Mar. 2, 1999 Sil ell Road Street Reconstruction Figure 3 City f Ea an Pro-ject 740 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting OLD BUSINESS A. CEDARVALE TASK FORCE APPOINTMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Appoint five (5) residents to serve on the Cedarvale area task force. FACTS: • At the February 16 Regular City Council meeting, action was taken to create a Cedarvale area study task force with the composition listed as follows: ➢ Two Economic Development Commission members ➢ Two Advisory Planning Commission members ➢ Five Cedarvale Special Service District area members ➢ Five area residents ➢ Two Advisory Parks Commission members • The EDC, APC and AprC were empowered to make their appointments to the task force. The Cedarvale special service district business group has appointed their five (5) members. • Direction was given to place an article in the local newspapers asking for interested residents to present letters to the City requesting consideration for appointment to the task force. There are nine (9) individuals who have submitted letters asking that they be considered for the task force. • The individuals are as follows: ➢ Barbara Kahle - 4483 Scott Trail ➢ Frances M. Bohn – 3990 Mica Trail ➢ Stephen Wallick–2089 Carnelian Lane ➢ Mary Ramnarine– 3785 Nicols Road ➢ Wayne Schweitzer– 1220 Town Centre Drive #213 ➢ Betty Bassett –2101 Wuthering Heights Road ➢ Tom Ellingson– 1779 Carnelian Lane ➢ Mark Hansen– 3550 Woodland Trail ➢ Lesley Chester–2085 Carnelian Lane • A ballot will be prepared with all names listed if it is the desire of the City Council to make the appointment using the same method as appointments were made for Organizational Business. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on page_� is a copy of an article that appeared in This Week newspaper entitled "Eagan seeks Cedarvale residents for task force". • Enclosed on pages 49.1—through are copies of the letters received from nine (9) residents seeking appointment to the task force. �O 1 Eagan seeks Cedarvale \ residents for task force ' By SARA THOMALLA-BLOOD and upcoming meetings. Eagan City Council members Up to two representatives from Dakota County will also set guidelines for forming a serve on the task force: Lynn task force to help guide city Moratzka, a planner for the staff and consultants on the Dakota County Physical De- Cedarvale area redevelopment velopment Department, and a r stud at their Feb. 16 meeting.y ig• county commissioner. n Now all they need are par- Although Eagan City Council ticipants. members won't officially serve In January the council ap- as members of the task force, proved the hiring of a consult- they have the option of attend- ing team to help direct the re- ing the task force meetings, development of the Cedarvale which will be held once a community. The project, ex- month, said City Administrator pected to be completed within Tom Hedges. six months, will serve as the The city of Eagan is also basis for future reconstruction looking for five residents to t and development. serve on the task force. The task force will consist of "Obviously, they'll have to ,52 from Eagan approximately 20 members be interested in being involved eld at Pinewood who will represent the city, in the process of future rede- .on Sparks, Nick county, and Cedarvale busi- velopment... but there is no cri- �dos Leader Tom nesses and residents. The ten- teria (for applicants to meet). ing, Mary Jarvis tative organization of the task 'They'll have to live in the force includes two representa- greater Cedarvale area and lives from the Economic De- have thoughts or concerns re- offers velopment Commission, two garding the issues and be will- from the Advisory Planning ing to be part of the process," classes Commission, and two from the said Hedges. \'MCA in Ea- Advisory Parks Commission. Residents interested in being Each commission will pick its considered for the task force 'BA classes. own representatives. are asked to submit a letter to dcond willode The Cedarvale Special Serv- Mayor Pat Awada and the City ice District will also appoint Council in care of Tom neet Sun- five members to serve on the Hedges, 3830 Pilot Knob •h March task force. To ensure that Road, Eagan 55122. Questions classes Cedarvale business and prop- can be directed to Senior x.456- erty owners have adequate and Planner Mike Ridley or Assis- diverse representation, the city tant City Administrator Jamie also planned to canvass the Verbrugge at (651) 681-4600. rea with flyers last week to in('arrrt people of the task force (See Cedarvale, p.12A) 6� February 26, 1999 Dear Mayor Pat Awada: I will be a homeowner in Eagan three years come this August. I have rented from an apartment close to the Cedarvale area for two years prior to buying my twinhome and I am currently a member of Bally's. I am concerned about how our area is doing now and for the future. I would like to learn the procedures of how the city council makes decisions that effect so many people and how it will affect the city of Eagan. I am interested in being considered for the task force. I work full time in Bloomington as an administrative assistant for a company called Computer Associates. I also work part time for Great Clips in Bloomington. I would like to become involved with the city I choose to call home. Thank you, Barbara Kahle 4483 Scott Trail Eagan, MN 55122 H: 651-454-0360 W: 612-921-7094 Cc: City Council c/o Tom Hedges 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 February 23, 1999 Mayor Pat Awada and the Eagan City Council c/o Tom Hedges 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor Awada and City Council Members: I have been a resident of the City of Eagan for 30 years and have seen it develop from a cluster of homes on old Cedar Avenue with Cedarvale as `bur downtown" to a large city with many advantages and opportunities for the future. I have had concerns dealing with Cedarvale Mall for many years because of the close proximity to my home. I have shopped there when it was a vital commercial center. Now it has fallen by the wayside and it distresses me to see this happening. It can offer many possibilities to the local residents and even other services to Bloomington and Burnsville. Please consider me for a member of this task force. I can see great plans and improvements for this center in the future. Cedarvale must not be forgotten. Sincerely, Frances M. Bohn 3990 Mica Trail Eagan, MN 55122 (651)454-5844 (h) (651)296-2881 (b) e213 FEB-23-1999 13:48 UANMAN CONST CO P.01i01 Post-it'Fax Note 7671 Da'O ztZ,3 pages► Stephen W.Wallick.ALA Tob4 D F, n, (651)- 681- 8181ttE�Gor pt" °�' A37E�►I _ LI FC FORMS c Faxw 0 s ��e� 541-Q �5� � fol 1- �7 Arch4c,m c,Planniq,Interior Design f'ab 2089 Carnelian Lane Eagan,Minnesota 55122 February 23, 1999 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Subject: Application for seat on Cedarvale Redevelopment Task Force Committee Dear Mr. Hedges: It was nice to talk with you the other day. I would very much like to be involved with the Cedarvale Redevelopment Task Force Committee. Eagan is a wonderful city to five in and I would like to see the Cedarvale area become another valued part of our city we all can be proud of both now and in many years to come. It is important we look closely at all of the issues to maximize the potential benefits this area can bring to our community. I am ready to commit myself 100% to representing both the neighborhood and the community with both my experience as a property owner and professional Architect. Sincerely, S phen allick, AIA cc: File TOTAL P.01 R=97% 02-23-99 02:46PM P001 #26 February 24, 1999 Mr. Tom Hedges Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN. 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: My husband and I understand that a citizen's advisory committee is being formed concerning the proposed development of the Cedarvale area. Since we live in close proximity of this area, we would like to volunteer to be on this particular committee. We would appreciate any information of this group; how often it meets, for how long, etc. Thank you. Sincerely, Mary & Sheldon Ramnarine 3785 Nicols Rd. Eagan, MN. 55122 #452-5032 6s February 25.1999 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, NIN 55122 Dear 1\11. Hedges, I am aware of the research and analysis regarding the future of the Cedarvale Mall. I am a resident of Eagan, b%ing at the O'Leary Manor for senior citizens, and self employed. P . I'm 62 years old and have corporate experience that �\ould be compatible and beneficial to the analysis. I. Site selection studies for Supervalu that included trade area and competition assessment that eventuafly led to a sales forecast for potential Supcixalu. Bti_ erh- and Cub retail stores that would be freestanding or mall locations. 2. Market and demographic analysis for all sorts of food products that would project market share. 3. Economic Development for ?worth Dakota to develop food processing businesses. If you see fit. I would like to be a part of the Cedaryale Mall analysis as a scr\ice to Lagan and as a resident. Please adtiise. I ha,e a resume that I could deliver to your ottice. Sincereh•. Wayne . Sc 4citzer 1220 Town entre Drive 4213 Eagan, AIT 55123 651-688-2586 To Tom Hedges, I would like to volunteer to serve on the Citizen Advisory Committee for the Cedarvale development at 13 and 77. I live near this intersection and would be available to attend all the meetings. 12 Sincerely, Betty B sett �/ February 23, 1999 Mayor Pat Awada City Council c/o Tom Hedges 3830 Pilot Knob Rd Eagan, MN. 55122 In regards to the recent article in This Week newspaper encouraging participation of residents of the Cedarvale area, I would like to make myself available for the Cedarvale Redevelopment task force. Having been a resident of the Cedar Grove area since 1970 1 have witnessed more prosperous times and have been saddened by its decline. I would be thrilled to be a part of the redevelopment process. sharing in the creation of a new vision that would steer the area to its greater potential. My daily contact with Eagan citizens may prove beneficial to the effort. For the past 20 years I have been a Realtor, with an office in Eagan and have watched the trends in our city development. I applaud the effort and the Councils vision to take action now. Experience with the city and other organizations that may prove helpful to the effort. • Previously sat on the Eagan Economic Development Commission. • Past member and President Eagan Crime Prevention Committee • Past member and President of the Exchanue Service Club. • Past Member of The Greater Lake Street Council revitalization effort, City of Mpls • Currently serving on the Site Selection Committee of the Dakota county chapter of Habitat for Humanity. I would appreciate your consideration for appointment to the task force and feel I could contribute to the redevelopment effort. Tom Ellingson 1779 Carnelian Lane Eagan, MN 55122 Residence: 651 454 7127 Office: 651 8682010 MOHAGEN architects, ltd. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS 1415 EAST WAYZATA BLVD., SUITE 200 WAYZATA, MN 55391 March 5, 1999 Honorable Mayor Pat Awada C/o Tom Hedges City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,Minnesota 55123 Re: Cedarville Redevelopment Task Force Dear Honorable Mayor Awada: The purpose of this letter is two-fold. First, I would like to commend the City Council on their vision and foresight related to the establishment of a specialized task force to evaluate the potential benefits associated with the proposed Redevelopment of the Cedarville Area. I truly believe this is an area of great potential for the refinement and enhancement of the Cities comprehensive development plan. Second, I would like to express my interest, as a resident,to be considered as a participant on the residential task force for the redevelopment study. Upon relocating to Eagan and constructing of our new home nearly 4 years ago, my wife and three children have thoroughly enjoyed the amenities and many benefits of the Eagan Community has to offer. However, as the land development opportunities within Eagan come to a close, the redevelopment of the Highway 13 Corridor could prove to be a significant enhancement or detriment to the Eagan Community. This area must carefully be evaluated, because the natural urge to allow any type of future development could prove to be devastating for the establishment of the long term goals and objectives of our community. All though I am not an immediate resident of the Cedarville neighborhood, I believe my knowledge and professional planning experience as an architect would provide valuable insight and objectivity in to what might potentially be viewed as an emotional evaluation. I would appreciate your consideration in my evaluation as a potential candidate for the Redevelopment Task Force. If selected, I would welcome the opportunity to work as a team member and serve our greater Eagan Community on this exciting and challenging endeavor. Should you require any additional information or wish to visit, you may contact me during the business day at (612)473-1985. Best Re/ands, I"\ ' Mark L. Hansen,AIA Principal Mark L. Hansen 3550 Woodland Trail Eagan, MN 55123 (651)405-1166 F:L4DMIMFormslmohltr.doc 6 PHONE: (612) 473-1985 FAX: (612) 473-1340 City Council From: Lesley Chester Sent: Thursday, March 04, 1999 11:28 AM To: 'council@cityofeagan.com' Subject: Cedarvale Task Force Mr. Tom Hedges, City Administrator Eagan Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges, I am writing to express my interest in being a part of the Cedarvale Area Redevelopment Task Force. My husband, Patrick and I have been residents of the Cedarvale area for almost one year. The back yard of our house faces one of the areas for redevelopment. I would like to be a part of this task force, because I am interested in making the Cedarvale area a great and safe place to live for our children and our neighbors children. I have been an Eagan resident for almost two years. I have become pretty heavily involved in the city of Eagan. You may have met me. I serve on the Eagan...Forever Green! Task Force and am a member of the Eagan Foundation. I know that when looking at other areas of Eagan, I compare them to the Cedarvale area. I firmly agree that this area needs some redevelopment. I have many ideas that I would like to share. I have to admit that I firmly believe that any more building of high density housing will be a big mistake. In the Cedarvale area, there already is a great deal of high density housing. I believe that this area needs a different make over, maybe something to draw families and tourists. I also would like to ensure that the Cedarvale area stays green with trees. Eagan is a beautiful city because of all the lovely trees. If I am selected to be on the task force, I will be a very committed member. I will be proud that I played a part in this project. Please consider me for participation on this task force. Thank you for the opportunity you have extended me in reading this letter. I look forward in hearing from you. If you should have any questions, I can best be reached at my work number, (651) 771-1301, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. or you can reach me at home at (651) 686-9396. My email address is Ichester@spysb.org. Thank you. Sincerely, Lesley A. Chester Cedarvale Area Resident 170 1 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting B. 1999-2003 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve, deny or approve with modifications the 1999-2003 Capital Improvement Program. FACTS: • Through 1998 staff worked within departments and met on numerous occasions to prepare a 1999-2003 CIP for City Council consideration. That work was completed within the parameters previously set by the City Council and the preparation of the document was consistent with previous years both in content and in format. • On November 24, 1998 City Council consideration of the 1999-2003 CIP was continued for review until early in 1999 after the new Council was in office. • On January 19, 1999 the 1999 year of the Part II (Vehicles and Equipment) was approved as a formal budget to allow purchasing deadlines to be met. • On February 9, 1999 a detailed presentation of the complete 1999-2003 CIP was made to the City Council and certain changes were approved to Part III of the document as presented. • With formal action at the meeting on March 16, the 1999 year becomes a budget and the final years, 2000 through 2003, will subsequently be incorporated into the next CIP covering the years 2000-2004. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on pages�through is a copy of the summaries of each part of the 1999-2003 CIP. ��/ • Enclosed on pages�_d—through '**94? is a copy of the changes approved by the City Council to the Part III infrastructure section as previously presented by the Public Works Department.a� • Enclosed on pages a v through is a copy of the City Administrator's memo outlining stall's desire to move the timeframe of the CIP to earlier in the year. The CIP will eventually be completed in advance of the annual operating budget. Note: Due to the volume and the fact that it has recently been distributed, the complete document has not been reproduced to be included with this packet. In the event any member of the City Council would like to have an additional copy of any or all of the material, please contact the City Administrator's Office. Ar -T T IIqgq STATION 2 REMODELING Parking Lot (Curb, Gutter, Surface) S 23,000 Garage Doors A) Door Replacement 11,000 B) Manual Operation for Power Outage 6,000 C) Weather Striping 2,500 Roof-New(Add insulation to min. requirements) 30,000 Carpet (Upstairs& 2 offices down) 3,000 Painting (Inside & Out) 18,000 Sign (Marquee out front) 5,000 Upstairs (Paneling, sheetrock, new ceiling tiles, lighting 8,000 Kitchen A) Downstairs -Relocate to upstairs and change downstairs to storage room) - 0- Bathrooms 0-Bathrooms - Upgrade to A.D.A. standards 21,000 Ceiling Fans - Install and guards on all 2,500 Furniture - Replace upstairs area and offices 5,000 Exterior Brick - Repair and wash and seal 3.000 Sub-total $141,000 Contingency (12%) 16.920 TOTAL $157,920 cc: Craig Jensen -Fire Chief Dave DiIoia -Battalion Chief Mark Adam -Battalion Chief Scott Wood - Sta. 2 Commander Mark Sportelli Station Manager G.•lPbt,9PAtSton onlRemodeGng.311 R q-T 1C VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SUMMARY BY YEAR BY DEPARTMENT Equipment Revolving Fund User Fees 1999 Information Technologies $ 52, 000 Community Development 65, 000 Police 399, 200 Fire 25, 000 Engineering 20, 000 Streets 387, 700 Parks & Rec/Tree Conservation 218, 000 Water $ 45, C00 1999 Totals $1 , 166 , 900 $ 45, 000 2000 Information Technologies $ 20, 000 Finance 18, 000 Community Development 30, 000 Police 197, 200 Fire 60, 000 Engineering 27, 500 Streets 268, 400 Parks & Rec/Tree Conservation 161 , 000 Water $ 37, 000 Sanitary Sewer 37, 000 2000 Totals $782 , 100 $ 74 , 000 2001 Information Technologies $ 156, 000 Finance 18, 000 Police 648, 300 Fire 220, 000 Engineering 15, 000 Central Services 60, 000 Streets 159, 100 Parks & Rec/Tree Conservation 185, 000 Water $ 20, 000 Sanitary Sewer 50, 000 2001 Totals $1 , 463 , 400 $ 70 , 000 2002 Information Technologies $ 46, 000 Finance 18, 000 Community Development 16, 500 Police 218, 300 Fire 123 , 000 Central Services 9, 000 Streets 378, 300 Parks & Rec/Tree Conservation 195, 000 Water $ 17, 000 Sanitary Sewer 20 , 000 2002 Totals $1 , 004 , 100 $ 37 , 000 1-3 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT (CONT'D) Equipment Revolving Fund User Fees 2003 Information Technologies $ 32, 500 Community Development 17, 000 Police 239,400 Fire 775, 000 Engineering 20, 000 Streets 279, 700 Parks & Rec/Tree Conservation 53, 000 Water $ 20, 000 Sanitary Sewer 20, 000 2003 Totals $1 , 416, 600 $ 40, 000 SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT Equipment Revolving Fund User Fees Information Technologies $ 308, 500 Finance 54 , 000 Com-munity Development 128 , 500 Police 1 , 702 , 400 Fire 1, 203 , 000 Engineering 82 , 500 Central Services 69, 000 Streets 1, 473, 200 Parks & Rec/Tree Conservation 812, 000 Water $139, 000 Sanitary Sewer 127, 000 $5, 833 , 100 $266, 000 A�-V -m- I P0.rK StIc A ui s t `:OV% °�' V�.V 1p wttK1. r The followingprojects have been reviewed b the Advisory Parks Commission and are being P J Y rY 8 recommended to the City Council For consideration in the 1999-2003 CIP: 1999 Project Cost • Playground installation -Evergreen Park(Paid from 1998 appropriations) • Second phase-Walden Heights Park $ 85,000 • Rahn Tennis Courts 35,000 • Acquisition: Don Grant property 240,000 • Property Repair/Other- Don Grant property 25,000 • Driveway Access -Patrick Eagan Park 25,000* • Soil Correction- Captain Dodd Park 25,000* *Projects not previously identified or formally reviewed as part of any pervious approvals. 2000 • Three playgrounds $ 75,000 • Blackhawk Park parking lot lights 30,000 • Lexington parking lot lights 70,000 • Thomas Lake Park parking lot 25,000 • North Park 100,000 2001 • Three playgrounds $75,000 • Shelter, Captain Dodd Park 20,000 • Shelter, Ridgecliff Park 20,000 • Shelter, Slaters Acres Park 20,000 2002 • Three Playgrounds $75,000 • Peridot Path Trail 10,000 • Meadowlands Park Trail 10,000 2003 • Lexington Diif]ey Athletic Field Lights $180,000 • Bur Oaks Park Trail/Bridge 30,000 • Carlson Lake Dock 20,000 • Two Playgrounds 50,000 Years 2000 through 2003 will be reviewed each year for reconsideration and recommendation. Staff is also suggesting that in July of 1999, a complete review of all projects be undertaken. Additional funds will have come into the Park Site Fund since the Commission first began this prioritization task in July of 1997. Q XT PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 5 YR. CIP (1999-2003) CATEGORY TOTAL $ • STREETS AND HIGHWAYS $30,185,000 • ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROADS $18,130,000 • LOCAL STREETS $10,375,000 • SEALCOAT MAINTENANCE $ 11165,000 • SIGNALS $ 467,000 • STREETLIGHTS (MAJOR INTERSECTIONS) $ 46,300 } • UTILITIES S 5,208,000 • WATER • TRUNK DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM $ 1,266,700 • OPERATIONS AND FACILITIES $ 3,270,000 • SANITARY SEWER • TRUNK COLLECTION SYSTEM $ 52,000 • OPERATIONS AND FACILITIES $ 20,000 • STORM SEWER • TRUNK CONVEYANCE SYSTEM $ 599,000 • OPERATIONS AND FACILITIES • WATER QUALITY GRAND TOTALS $35,393,000* f �T N r O O O O o0 N 69 69 69 69 69 foe F �t iF V] O O O O C O V r— O O O �.y M M kr) 69 69 69 69 M _A CG a �- F oc IC p, 3 d 69 cos 611� 69 69 � o QU U � iE dF U >' O O O O O O Q > kr O O O O v U U 69 69 61S 69 6S z CIO � o z X In L L L �Vp o U h U C3CN 3 L1 L C Cf ) NO N N O L = 1 city of eagan MEMO TO: FILE FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 11, 1999 SUBJECT: ADJUSTMENTS TO THE 5-YEAR CIP (1999-2003) At a Special Council Workshop session held on February 23, 1999, the City Council specifically reviewed in detail Part III of the 5-Year CIP (1999-2003) as prepared by the Public Works Department. As a result of that Workshop Session and related discussion, the City Council directed that the following revisions be made to the submitted plan: Council Direction 1. South Dodd Road (1999.1) - This project was originally proposed for 1999 but has been postponed for reconsideration in the year 2000. The staff was directed to try and obtain a neighborhood consensus for a cul-de-sac, which would reclassify this from a neighborhood collector to a local residential street. 2. Yankee Doodle Road Extension (2000.4)— This project was originally programmed for the year 2000. However, the City Council concurred that it should be deferred to the year 2001 due to the extensive public involvement, right-of-way acquisition and current design workloads. 3. Dodd Road, Diffley to Wescott (2003.9) — Based on the relatively low traffic volumes and good structural condition of the pavement, the Council felt that 2003, as originally proposed,would be premature and the project should be put in the"Future"category. In addition to the direction for revisions identified above, recent City Council action has resulted in the following revisions: Council Action 4. Beau d'Rue Drive (1999.4) — As a result of a public hearing held on March 2, the City Council deferred consideration for this project until the year 2000. This would allow the completion of the Cedarvale Area Redevelopment Study to be completed, which would identify any potential impacts to the street segment. 5. Blue Gentian Road Realignment (1999.10)—The realignment of the gravel road portion of Blue Gentian Road was originally programmed for 1999 based on the City Council's approval of Project 745 at a public hearing held on August 18, 1998. However, on �g February 16, 1999, the City Council amended the scope of the project and deleted the realigned segment of Blue Gentian Road from Blue Water Road to Highway 55. This is in response to affected property owners' contention that this realignment was premature prior to development proposals. Subsequently,this roadway improvement has been moved to the "Future"category. 6. Duckwood Drive (1999.5) — On January 19, the City Council accepted staff's recommendation to defer the consideration of a structural overlay on the neighborhood collector Duckwood Drive from 1999 to the year 2000 based on its current Pavement Condition Index rating. 7. Northwood Drive (Future.4) — The proposed Northwood Drive overpass from Denmark Avenue to Pilot Knob Road through the Glen Pond apartment complex was originally identified as a "Future" project. However, Council action taken on February 16 authorized the full right-of-way acquisition in 1999 to be able to accommodate this future segment of the Ring Road when traffic volume/congestion warrants it. 8. Hilltop Estates (1999.7)— On January 5, the City Council accepted staff's recommendation to defer the consideration of a structural overlay within a local residential street in the Hilltop Estates Addition from 1999 to the year 2000 based on its current Pavement Condition Index rating. Summary Due to the late adoption of the 5-Year CII' (1999-2003) and the accelerated time frame for consideration of the next generation 5-Year CIP (2000-2004), these changes will not be made to the `99-'03 CIP but are identified by this memo which will be included with that earlier document. Respectfully submitted, J/ " Z" - Director of Public Works C: All CIP Document Holders TAC/J MEMO city of eagan TO: Director of Finance/City Clerk VanOverbeke Director of Public Works Colbert Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa Senior Planner Ridley Chief Building Official Reid - Police Chief Gegan Fire Chief Jensen FROM: City Administrator Hedges DATE: March 2, 1999 SUBJECT: 2000-2004 Capital Improvement Program As we discussed at the department head meeting on February 23, 1999 1 think it is the consensus of the group that advancing the preparation of the CIP to early in the year would be beneficial for staff and the City. The transition will obviously be confusing since the last document is not yet ratified, however I would like to have future five year CIP's completed before work on the operating budget begins each May. Not only does this coordinate the two documents better but it also allows the necessary advance work on the infrastructure projects that incorporate a great deal of public input. The timing will also be better in accommodating the transition of elected officials in years when that occurs. To incorporate the transition with the 2000-2004 CIP I am proposing that we provide for some overlap this year. I would like to have your information returned to my office by April 16, 1999. 1 will then review the information and meet with you individually as desired and appropriate. We will complete the department head review of Part If (Vehicles and Equipment) and plan to go to the City Council for their consideration of the CIP in May at which time you will also begin working on the year 2000 operating budget. In subsequent years we will advance the schedule to complete the CIP document before work begins on the operating budget. This will obviously work better in certain areas than in others but I just ask that we all do the best we can with the challenge. Given the transition, we are not going to publish a complete, packaged 1999- 2003 CIP document. However, I would like you to use that information as the starting point for your submission so that we can coordinate the material and easily follow the process from one year to the next. I have attached a copy of Part II for reference. Gene will be able to provide you with any other necessary YO starting material, if there are any questions. am not going to prescribe any particular format other than the request that you start with what was (will be) approved by the City Council for 1999-2003. The other parameters will remain the same including a 3% annual inflation adjustment, a $5,000 minimum and a clear delineation of new versus replacement for Part II requests. Only City wide technology items will be considered in the Information Technologies department. Department related technology items will be considered within individual departments. have decided to send these ideas out for your review in advance of the department head meeting. We will still plan on discussing it at the meeting on March 9. Thanks for your on going diligence in the preparation of these documents and in the administration of the affairs of the City. 4tiStyy Administr or { Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting C. WESCOTT RD/LEXINGTON AVE.—TRAFFIC SIGNAL ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the Signal Justification Report and authorize the preparation of a Feasibility Report for Project 766 (Wescott Rd. — Signalization). FACTS: • On January 5, 1999 the City Council authorized the preparation of a Signal Justification Report (SJR) to document the traffic conditions at the intersection of Wescott Rd. and Lexington Ave. and determine if sufficient warrants were met to justify the installation of a traffic signal. • The SJR has been completed by the City's consulting firm of SRF and is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of authorizing the preparation of a detailed feasibility report to identify the scope, costs, easements, schedule and method of financing for the required public improvement. • Since Lexington Ave. is County Rd. 43, the County will be financing 50% of the signal system. Mr. Don Theisen, the new Dakota County Engineer, will be at the meeting to introduce himself to the City Council and answer any questions. • The results of the analysis indicate that currently the intersection is operating over capacity during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Five separate warrants are met to justify the installation of a signal at this intersection. Signalization, with approach lane geometric changes, will provide an acceptable Level of Service for all hours of the day for both current and 20 year projected volumes. ISSUES: • The installation of a signal at this location will require some reconstruction of the Wescott Rd. approaches to provide the required dedicated left-turn lanes as well as the need to properly align the through lanes to safely accommodate the 45 mph design speed. In order to minimize the encroachment of the lane widening onto adjacent properties, it may require the reconfiguration of the entire stretch of Wescott Rd. from its current 4-lane to a 3-lane section, with safety shoulders that would be widened into a full right-turn lane at major intersections (similar to Diffley Rd. east of Braddock). Then, with only one east bound through lane, a median might have to be installed east of Lexington Ave. to prevent left turns into the existing single-family properties as they would not have the availability of a protected left-turn lane. The alternative would require a second through lane resulting in additional right-of-way acquisition. A detailed feasibility report would be able to better identify the impacts to adjacent properties for various alternatives. ATTACHMENTS: • Signal Justification Report, enclosed without page numbers Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 D. PROJECT 726, GREENSBORO ADDITION STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve / deny Project 726 (Greensboro Addition — Storm Sewer Improvements) and, if approved, authorize the public funding of the improvements. FACTS: • On September 17, 1997, city staff received a petition requesting rear yard drainage improvements in Greensboro Additions. The City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report to address the scope, cost, schedule and financing of improvements to the drainage area. • Greensboro First Addition was platted in July 1986 and Greensboro Second Addition was platted in June 1987. The block bordered by Cross Road to the south and Greensboro Drive to the north includes 15 single-family residential homes. The five lots adjacent to Cross Road were platted as part of the First Addition, the other ten were part of the Second. • A drainage swale along the rear property lines was to be constructed to serve the runoff from the lots. A storm sewer catch basin was installed at the rear of Lots 9 and 10 to connect the swale to the storm sewer system. • The homebuilders graded each of the lots individually as part of the house construction. Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 of Greensboro Second Addition have had drainage problems since 1990. The problems included water in the basement and ponding of water to a 12"+ depth in the back yard. Previous attempts by the owners to correct the problem have had limited success. • On December 16, 1997, the feasibility report for Project 726 was presented to the City Council and a public hearing was scheduled for February 3, 1998. The proposed public improvement was not acceptable to the majority of the property owners included within the potential assessment area due to the estimated assessments. • The public hearing was subsequently continued until March 2, 1998, based upon the efforts that were being made by some of the residents to cooperatively have the improvements constructed privately. The residents leading the private improvement efforts, Julie Casey and Brad Wendel, received consent from the affected property owners to complete a lesser design drainage improvement within the city's easement. The City Council directed staff to work with the residents to facilitate an acceptable solution. • With the neighborhood's consent to the private improvements proposed by Ms. Casey and Mr. Wendel, the City Council subsequently denied the public improvement project on March 2, 1998. However, staff continued to facilitate the completion of the improvements privately. • The private improvements were installed in May 1998 consisting of a 4" drain tile connecting two small catch basins in the backyards of the two residents to the public catch basin at the east end of the block. The small pipe size was installed at the request of the neighbors to limit the disturbance to the yards. • Since the installation of the private improvements, two significant rain events occurred in which both residents' homes had water overflow the window wells and flood their basements. The drain tile was functioning at full capacity in both events. 4.3 • On September 1, 1998, the City Council considered the Greensboro drainage issue at a Special Council Meeting. Staff presented the history of the drainage in the Greensboro Additions to the Council and Ms. Casey and Mr. Wendel presented their drainage concerns. Council directed staff to acquire bids from contractors to construct the "West Line" alignment in the feasibility report and present the bid prices to the council at the October 6 meeting for further consideration of the funding responsibilities. • Due to busy contractor schedules toward the end of the construction season last year, bid prices were not obtained in time to consider construction prior to winter. Staff has obtained bids from three contractors to complete the improvement this spring. A copy of the bid tabulation is attached. • All bids have been reviewed for compliance with the bid specifications and accuracy on unit price extensions and arithmetic. The low bid from S. W. Lee Construction, Inc. has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be acceptable for favorable Council action. ISSUES: • There is one additional property that the improvements must be completed across in order to connect to the public storm sewer. The City has easements on this property to do this improvement. It would be preferable to construct the improvements outside of a portion of the existing easement to reduce the depth of the pipe and avoid an existing split rail fence. The property owners would prefer the alignment outside of the easement, but will not sign an agreement until the City Council approves the improvement and makes a determination on the funding. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility Report, pages „ through /Ob. • Site Map, page /0/ . • Bid Recommendation, pages /0.through 103 . CIL City of Eagan Report for Greensboro Addition Storm Sewer Improvements City Project No. 726 Eagan, Minnesota pR c. December, 1997 0 Dat: EAGi.i`i ^Nr"iJEERING DEPT ?5"- city of czagan THOMAS EGAN December 16, 1997 May^r PATRICIA AWADA Honorable Mayor and Cit Council BEA IST }r y SANDRRAA A, MASIN City of Eagan THEODORE WACHTER 3830 Pilot Knob Road Council Members Ea an, MN 55122 THOMAS HEDGES g City Administrator RE: Greensboro Addition Storm Sewer Improvements Report city c erk ovERBEKE City Project No. 726 Dear Mayor and City Council: Attached is our report for the Greensboro Addition Storm Sewer Improvements, City Project No. 726. The report presents and discusses the proposed improvements and includes a cost estimate and preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council at your convenience to review and discuss the contents of this report. Sincerely, 4 -John P. Gorder Development/Design Engineer I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ohn P. Gorder Date: 12-1&-'F-7 Reg. No. 2 '13 Reviewed By: /Z--/-7-137 Dept. of Public Works Date Reviewed By: qlk�� — -Al Ft ce Dept. Date MUNICIPAL CENTER THE LONE OAK TREE MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 3501 COACHMAN Pok T EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 EAGAN.MINNESOTA 551 22 PHONE (612)681-4600 &1rmative PHONE(612;681-43C0 FAX (612)681-4612 Equal Opportu Action Employer FAX:(612)681-4360 TDD (612)454-8535 TDD (612)454-8535 Table of Contents Letter of TransmittaU Certification Table of Contents Page Introduction.................................................................................1 Discussion....................................................................................2 Feasibilityand Recommendations......................................................3 Easement/Permits...........................................................................3 CostEstimate................................................................................4 Assessments..................................................................................4 ProjectSchedule............................................................................5 Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll Figures Figure 1 —Location Map Figure 2— Storm Sewer Improvements Figures 3 —Drainage Tile Detail Figure 4 -Easements U Introduction This report is in response to a resident's concern regarding poor backyard drainage patterns in the Greensboro Addition block bordered by Cross Road to the south, Greensboro Drive to the north, and Greensboro Lane to the east in central Eagan (see Figure 1). This area includes Lots 1-5, Block 4 Greensboro 1St Addition platted in 1986 and Lots 1-10, Block 4 Greensboro 2nd Addition platted in 1987. The poor drainage is due to a combination of very flat initial grading at time of development, poor finish grading at time of individual building permits, and landscaping placed within existing drainage and utility easements inhibiting runoff. These conditions have created areas of standing water in landscaped portions of the residents' yards for long periods after a rain event and have occurred since the property was developed in 1986-87. The standing water does not occur on all of the properties mentioned above but all of the lots contribute drainage to the area in question. Private neighborhood initiatives to deal with this problem have not been successful as there was not full cooperation by some of the neighbors within the drainage area who do not currently have drainage problems on their properties. Subsequently, the residents who do have inadequate drainage on their property have petitioned the City to investigate the situation for possible solutions. O � 1 J❑`J �❑ ONE OAK ROAD O Ll tl \ ❑ N A a \ � o � - \ \ a z Y 1' = 2000' A � I o Y \ d a PROMENADE PL. � � W YANKE DOODLE AD \ I 2 PROJECT LOCATION \ ❑ 4 n - v p \❑ c^Z - 13 ' ❑ 39 i i FISH n nW C SS� ❑ VESCOTT ROAD ❑� ❑ ` a � 37 v �l 24 ❑ 21 DEERV�O 1 45 11 \ tSD, 196 ❑ ac:o. RD. 30) DgFFLFY 92 42 � � n Revised GREENSBORO ADD, — STORM SEWER City of Eagan U ? PROJECT 726 Discussion Two eight-inch diameter drain tile lines are proposed to be extended from existing storm sewer structures to handle drainage from these backyard areas, as shown on Figure 2. One line would be constructed from the existing street catch basin at Cross Road and Greensboro Road, across the rear lot lines of Lot 1, Block 4 Greensboro ls` and Lot 1, Block 4 Greensboro 2nd, to the low area in the rear lot line of Lot 2, Block 4 Greensboro 2nd Addition. This drain tile line is depicted on Figure 2 as the "West Line". The other line will extend from the existing rear yard catch basin at the corners of Lots 8, 9 and 10, Block 4 Greensboro 2nd Addition, west across the rear lot lines of Lots 4-8, to a low area in the southwest corner of Lot 4. This drain tile line is depicted on Figure 2 as the "East Line". These storm sewer systems will provide for drainage of the backyard areas along the entire length of the pipes through percolation into the system as detailed on Figure 3. These lines will drain to the City storm sewer system. Catch basin structures will be placed at bend locations in the pipes to allow access for City Maintenance personnel. These drain tile and catch basin systems will provide drainage for a majority of the backyard areas studied. However, portions of the backyards may require further grading to provide positive drainage into the systems. The proposed drain tile lines and catch basin structures will be placed at locations and depths so as to allow further re-grading of the backyard areas by the individual property owners, if they so wish. Restoration of the disturbed areas after installation of the drain tile system will include sodding, salvage and replacement of fences and shrubs, etc. 2 C5 EXIST. CB. Q 80, 'T o o �p ` Ln 0 2 ` \ _ PROPOSED "EAST LINE" 0 co JQ) HUNTER �y - - - - - - • O Ln PROPOSED "WEST LINE" i i i i i V) N ii ii i i N O co EXIST. CB. I I � I i i GREENSBORO DR. GBOR0811 GREENSBORO ADD.- STORM SEWER 12-2-97 CITY OF EAGAN ?/ ..I PROJECT 726 Fi9. 2. COURSE FIL cR AGGREGATE — o OR 8" PVC PERFORATED MN / 0-O.T. 3149 . 2H PIPE— SEE OETAIL BELOW THE PIPE -%{ALL BE LINED WITH CELANESE c0 0 0 ° ° o v°a� IAIRAFI 140 FILTER o v� FABRIC OR APPROVED PIPE DIA. b o c°o 0 c 60 EQUAL 0 0 , 0 0 6" 110.p 004%1 0 O� C)o°"�_FILTER FABRIC CAN of PLACED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE AGGREGATE 2'_0" MAX AS AN ALTERNATE. TRENCH DETAIL 1/4'1 DIA. HOLE , TYPICAL. SEE SPECIFI CATIONS 6" OR 1 8 " DIA. i 90° 1600 PIPE DETAIL city of eagan got WORKS FIGURE WDRAINAGE TILE lamWORK3 DEPARTMENT] Feasibility and Recommendation This project is necessary to improve the rear lot drainage of the surrounding properties and maintain home and property values. This project is cost-effective in that the proposed improvement will protect the existing houses and landscaping of the surrounding properties from further storm water damage. The estimated costs are favorable to costs associated with restoration of property damaged previously and potential future property damage. This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint. Easements/ Permits The proposed drain tile lines will be considered a public utility to be maintained by the City, and therefore need to be included within drainage and utility easements. Since the drainage and utility easements along the lot lines dedicated with the platting of the Greensboro subdivisions are not sufficient in width for the proposed construction and do not follow the existing drainage patterns, additional easements will need to be obtained from the surrounding properties as shown on Figure 4. For purposes of this report, easement acquisition costs are estimated at $1,500 per lot. Easements are required from 8 lots. Therefore, easement acquisition costs are estimated to be $12,000. Permanent and temporary easements will need to be obtained from the following properties(8 total): Greensboro 1" Addition Greensboro 2°d Addition Lot 1, Block 4 Lots 1-2, Block 4 Lots 4-8, Block 4 ?3 3 g LKJ 8 1w 800 145sq.ft. 4, Ln �2 �C) 325 sq.ft-- O OO 270 sq.ft. 375 sq.ft. HUNTER LN. - - - - - - - I O 5 I V . I 305 sq.ft. : L - - - - N Go I I Q N I � u') � I I I I I 11 O i I i GREENSBORO DR. GBORESMT PROJECT 726 SBORO ADD.- STORM SEWER 12-2-97 CITY OF EAGAN REQUIRED PERMANENT EASEMENTS Fig. 4 Cost Estimate Detailed cost estimates are located in Appendix A. The estimates are based on anticipated 1998 construction costs and include a 10 percent contingency and indirect costs of 30 percent, which include legal, administration, engineering and bond interest. Summaries of the costs, including easement acquisition, are as follows: Storm Sewer Construction ..................... $43,995 Easements.......................................... l� 2,000 Total Project Cost $559995 Assessments Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties on a per square foot area of contributing drainage area basis. The proposed assessment rates were determined by dividing the project cost by the total area of contributing drainage to the backyard areas, as follows: Estimated Project Cost= $55,995 Total Contributing Drainage Area = 113,040 SF Proposed Assessment Rate = $0.495/ SF Drainage Assessments will be revised based on final project costs. The properties proposed to be assessed are shown on Figure 5. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B. q 5- 4 o - - - - - - - - - - - - 0) r\n LKI F81 1 80' v� S o • DPRIPO "EAST LINE" DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY HUNTER 4 ♦;ell F5] \�S� LN. 0 ; NSB N F4] o PROPOSED "WEST LINE" O 2 � 0 a 0 crm c� U 1 i GREENSBORO DR. it LOTS TO BE ASSESSED GREENSBORO ADD.- STORM SEWER 12-12-97 CITY OF EAGAN PROJECT 726- LOTS TO BE ASSESSED Fig. 5 Proiect Schedule* Present Feasibility P City Report to Ci Council/ Order Public Hearing............................................. December 16, 1997 Neighborhood Meeting.................................................... January,1998 Public Hearing ........................................................... February 3, 1998 Award Contract................................................................. March, 1998 Project Completion...............................................................May, 1998 Final Assessment Hearing ..............................................October, 1998 First Payment Due with Property Tax Statement ..............................................................................May, 1999 *Schedule assumes timely conveyance of easements. 5 Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Greensboro Addition Storm Sewer City Project No. 726 1) West Line Unit Item Unit Price Total Connect to Ex. Catch Basin Ea. 1 $1,000 $1,000 27" Dia. Catch Basin w/cstg. Ea. 4 800 3,200 8" PVC, SDR 35 Pipe LF 130 15 1,950 8" Drain tile w/ sock LF 170 15 2,550 Coarse Filter Aggregate CY 20 10 200 Geotextile Fabric SY 190 2.50 200 Salv. & Reinstall Split Rail Fence LF 100 10 1,000 Salv. & Reinstall Wood Fence LF 30 20 600 Salv. & Reinstall Planter Box LS 1 500 500 Sod w/ 3" Topsoil SY 500 6 3.000 Subtotal $14,475 +10% Contingencies 1,450 Subtotal $15,925 +30% Indirect Costs 4,780 Total $209705 9 2)East Line Unit Item Unit .QIYI Price Total Connect to Ex. Catch Basin EA 1 $11000 $1,000 27" Diameter Catch Basin w/ cstg. EA 4 800 3,200 8" Drain tile w/ sock LF 370 15 5,550 Coarse Filter Aggregate CY 35 10 350 Geotextile Fabric SY 410 2.50 15025 Salv. & Transplant Vegetation EA 10 150 1,500 Sod w/ 3" Topsoil SY 610 6 3,660 Subtotal $16,285 +10% Contingencies 1,630 Subtotal $17,915 +30% Indirect Costs 5.375 Total $239290 Total — Storm Sewer $439995 Estimated Easement Acquisition 512,000 Total Project Cost $559995 Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll Greensboro Addition Storm Sewer City Project No. 726 Proverty Drainaee Area(SF) Rate/SF ota ssessment! Greensboro 1"Addition Lot 1 ,Block 4 3,180 $0.495 $1,585 Lot 2, Block 4 8,270 0.495 4,095 Lot 3, Block 4 15,390 0.495 7,620 Lot 4, Block 4 11,850 0.495 5,865 Lot 5, Block 4 5,080 0.495 2,525 Greensboro 2nd Addition Lot 1, Block 4 6,200 0.495 3,080 Lot 2, Block 4 6,900 0.495 3,415 Lot 3, Block 4 6,650 0.495 3,290 Lot 4, Block 4 8,180 0.495 4,050 Lot 5, Block 4 8,480 0.495 4,200 Lot 6, Block 4 7,850 0.495 3,885 Lot 7, Block 4 8,500 0.495 4,205 Lot 8, Block 4 6,300 0.495 3,125 Lot 10, Block 4 10,210 0.495 5,055 Totals 113,040 $55,995 /OO c��o K� in U n I (0 0 -w oO 7 '0 n j O1 <b C0 N 0 y C A c _ D C)a C O C7 f FA -0 rt Z< II n O '+ FA j 0 . 0 0-0 O O O O tT rt to cn Doo .O+ O 0 y �"' G7� o O � 333oca Ao I cn 7 O '. 0 = = 3 Q A o ' 0 t ao Q " oto Z rNa Orth < Oo Z c'!CD ° C =r < a o � _ 1 O � 00 j a c 0 0 G to Q G � A n O , 0- Q c:a of C 0 =CL c 0 0 y 7 � � 1 � � i I M w ` S ca 4 cr O \ �` o p ry El (D > �� CL a O • (n m- - - - - - - - - - - - - cr) i 0O - w 3 0 N 0 I I � O I CROSS RD. I i i � I MEMO Date: March 11, 1999 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members From: Russ Matthys, City Engineer John Gorder, Development/Design Engineer Subject: Greensborough Addition City Project No. 726 Three contractors solicited bids in January of 1999 for the above-mentioned project. A summary of the bids received is as follows: Contractor Base Bid Alternate No. 1 Alternate No.2 1. Dave Perkins Cont. $12, 190 $11,975 $12,295 2. S.W. Lee Cont. $12,450 $11,905 $12,355 3. Ryan Cont. $21,780 $21,780 $21,780 The following summarizes the results of the low base bid versus the preliminary feasibility report estimates: Preliminary Low Report Base Bid Deviation Storm Sewer Construction $12,375 $12,190 - 1.5% Alternate Bids were also received for the above-mentioned project. The alternate bids included the costs associated with a substitution in materials used for the piping of the project from PVC sewer pipe to HDPE single wall sewer pipe. Based on the alternate bid substitution, the low bidder for the project was S.W. Lee Contracting . The following summarizes the results of the low bid versus the preliminary report estimate: Preliminary Low Report Alt. Bid No. 1 Deviation Storm Sewer Project Using HDPE Pipe $12,375 $11,905 - 3.8% /tJ� Favorable bids for this project are likely due to the competitive bidding climate at this time of year. With their favorable bids received, it is recommended to award the contract to the low bidder, S.W. Lee Contracting, Inc. of Eden Prarie, using the figures provided for bid alternate No. 1. The alternate bid will result in a savings of$285 over the low base bid. S.W. Lee Contracting has completed numerous utility projects in the City of Eagan in the past few years. They have provided quality work on several projects and have shown a commitment to workmanship to the City. If the contract is awarded by the City Council, the following construction schedule is anticipated: Begin Construction April 26', 1999 Complete Construction June 4th, 1999 /03 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 E. PROJECT 663,VALLEY VIEW PLATEAU ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To consider a request for an Assessment Agreement for Parcel 10-40100-012-01 under Project 663 (Valley View Plateau — Street and Utility Improvements). FACTS: • On April 7, 1998, the City Council approved the reconstruction of the streets and utilities within Valley View Plateau. At that public hearing, Nader Nooryshokry (2840 Sibley Memorial Highway) requested that the City Council address the assessment against his property. The council stated that it would be more appropriate to discuss the assessments at the final assessment hearing. The assessment hearing is tentatively scheduled for July 1999. • After the project approval and contract award, Mr. Nooryshokry accepted an out of state job offer and placed his home up for sale. Mr. Nooryshokry has stated that the large pending assessments are limiting his ability to sell in a timely manner. Staff has received inquiries about the property and the pending assessment from potential buyers. • On October 6, 1998, Mr. Nooryshokry appeared before the City Council to request the approval of an assessment deferral agreement for his property to reduce the pending assessments. Upon his understanding that the deferral agreement would only delay the assessments for a maximum of 30 years, Mr. Nooryshokry withdrew his request. He was encouraged to subdivide his property (as originally proposed with the Hayes Addition) to minimize the impact of the assessments which are based on the 3 future lot equivalents. • Later on this meeting's agenda, the City Council is considering the approval of a preliminary subdivision — Nader Addition, to create three single family lots out of Mr. Nooryshokry's property located near the corner of Highview Avenue and Bridgeview Terrace. /0 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting F. PROJECT 745, BLUE GENTIAN RD. CUL-DE-SAC ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve / Deny the installation of a cul-de-sac on the east end of the gravel portion of Blue Gentian Rd. and, if approved, change the name to Blue Gentian Circle. FACTS: • On August 18, 1998 the City Council closed the public hearing and approved Project 745 providing for the realignment of the gravel road portion of Blue Gentian Rd. As part of that project, the existing gravel road would have been reconstructed at either end providing for a side street connection to the new realignment and renamed Blue Gentian Circle. • On Feb. 16, 1999 the City Council amended the scope of the project and deleted the realigned segment of Blue Gentian Rd. from Blue Water Rd. to Hwy 55. As part of that action, the Council considered three options to address the required revised connection of Blue Gentian Circle. Based on the lack of consensus from the neighborhood, the Council directed that the gravel road portion of Blue Gentian Rd. remain as is on the west end and be connected to the new Blue Gentian alignment at the east end maintaining continued through traffic movement between Hwy 55 and the industrial properties. • On March 2, the City Council received a petition from 9 property owners requesting the Council to revise their previous action and authorize a cul-de-sac to be constructed on the east end. The Council directed that the item be scheduled on the March 16 agenda and all property owners be so informed. • If this request is approved, it is advisable that the name of the gravel road portion be changed to Blue Gentian Circle to avoid confusion with the Blue Gentian Rd. designation within the industrial park. ISSUES: • Based on the previous Council action reducing the scope of Project 745, this petition could be considered a request for a local improvement on a local street. Therefore, the Council should decide on how it should be financed. If special assessments are proposed, a formal public hearing process should be initiated to formally approve such a project. If it is to be considered part of the original Project 745 (Blue Gentian Rd. — Streets and Utilities), the scope of the project should be formally amended again to include this work. ATTACHMENTS: • Notice to neighborhood,pages��through . 41 city of czagan PATRICIA E. AWADA Mayor PAUL BAKKEN BEA BLOMQUIST PEGGY A.CARLSON SANDRA A. MASIN March 5, 1999 Council Members THOMAS HEDGES Cify Administrotcr E.J. VAN OVERBEKE Re: Blue Gentian Road Cul-de-Sac Option No. 1 City Clerk Dear Property Owner: As you are aware, on February 16, the City Council considered the previously submitted survey responses regarding the various options of cul-de-sacs on existing Blue Gentian Road and approved Option No. 3, which provided for full through traffic movement with no cul-de-sac on either end. This action was in conjunction with the City Council reducing the scope of City Project 745 (Blue Gentian Road—Realignment). On March 2, the City Council received the enclosed petition from 9 property owners requesting that the existing gravel road portion of Blue Gentian Road have a cul-de-sac constructed on the east end, with access available only from the Highway 55 signalized intersection with Lexington Avenue. This is similar to original Option No. 1. Upon receipt of this petition, the Council scheduled it to be formally discussed at their next meeting on Tuesday, March 16. If you have any questions in the interim, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, i Y41�1_ /4,�,� `Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj Enclosure: Petition w/Map MUNICIPAL CENTER THE LONE OAK TREE MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 3501 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN,MINNESOTA 55122-1897 EAGAN,MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE(651)681-4600 PHONE.(651)681-4300 FAX (651)681-4612 Equal Opportunity Employer FAX.(651)681-4360 TDD (651)454-8535 TDD:(651)454-8535 Mr Thomas Hedges City Administrator !EGEIVE0 F -8 2 5 1999 Eagan, MN 55122 Subject: Blue Gentian Cul-De-Sac. At the Feb 16 council meeting, the Blue Gentian residents concerns were overshadowed by the larger issue of project 745. From the meeting it appeared that the resident were not in agreement with what should be done with the street. After talking with the residents on the road, all of us are in agreement in favor of a Cul-De-Sac. Out of the eleven homes, nine are in favor of a Cul-De-Sac at the East end, with the Hwy 55 end open. It is requested that this separate item be placed on the next council agenda for consideration so that the residents concerns can be addressed. Enclosure: Residents votes. '/ �y SOU 7,7 / ��, ��7L4�Pirt/ �'I ts�-tr=t�j ,��'�rt c.� ✓ ��.�,�� CS q ll /U� / ld� ,v l� ��!/L C.L.. ✓'moi G��/!(� CEIVED F E 8 2 5 Ae INTERSTATE 494 LOY & AVIS BERGH BARBARA & DANIEL NORD 1023 BLUE GENTIAN RD.--\ GEORGE WEINHANDL 1003 BLUE GENTIAN RD. IOIS BLUE GENTIAN RD. EDITH DRAKE RAYMOND & MARIE \ GRREEGORY & CORRINE 999 BLUE GENTIAN RD. NUTZMAN 1011 BLUE GENTIAN/RD. 1027 BLUE GENTIAN RD. i / - `1 r\ STEVE & ,IuuE CHAPPLE 988 BLUE GENTIAN RD. PATRICIA PAVLIC 990 BLUE GENTIAN RD. cp MARILYN SANFORO 1020 BLUE GENTIAN RD. ROGER do GLADYS REILING 1030 BLUE GENTIAN RD. M S 0 50 0 50 scute ® IN FAVOR OF OPTION 1 I NOT IN FAVOR OF OPTION 1 G:MISCDXF/BGR_0PTI0N1 a BLUE / BLUE WATER ROAD FEB. 199 CITY OF EAGAN OPTION 1 Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting NEW BUSINESS A. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 4 (CONSTRUCTION LICENSING, PERMITS AND REGULATION) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To amend Ordinance to Chapter 4 Entitled "Construction Licensing, Permits & Regulation" by modifying language adding Section 4.05 regarding plumbing permit plan reviews. FACTS: • The Eagan City Council adopted an amendment to Ordinance No. 272 on December 15, 1998. It was subsequently published in the legal newspaper on December 31, 1998 and sent to the Minnesota Department of Health. • The Minnesota Department of Health contacted the Protective Inspections Division and asked that it be amended to reflect that the State of Minnesota will provide plan review services for the following state licensed buildings or structures: hospitals; nursing homes, supervised living facilities and similar health care related facilities regulated by the MN Department of Health; buildings owned by the federal and state government; and projects of a special nature for which the Minnesota Commissioner of Health's review is requested by either the City or the State. ATTACHMENTS: (1) Proposed Ordinance, pages�through . ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER FOUR ENTITLED "CONSTRUCTION LICENSING, PERMITS & REGULATION" BY ADDING SECTION 4.05 REGARDING PLUMBING PERMIT PLAN REVIEWS BY CITY; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 4.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter Four is hereby amended by adding Section 4.04, to read as follows: Sec. 4.05. Plumbing Permit and Plan Required. Subd. 1. It is unlawful for any person to install or construct any new plumbing system or parts thereof, including additions, extensions, alterations and replacements, connected to a water or sewage disposal system owned or operated by or for a municipality, institution, factory, office building, apartment building or other place of business without first obtaining a plumbing permit for each such building, structure or plumbing system from the City. Subd. 2. Permits for the installation or construction of a plumbing system shall only be issued to plumbing contractors duly licensed by the State and shall be issued only upon the review and approval of a plumbing plan by the City. us Sub&,isivi shall net apply to s hee. ed r agd-ingser- stnciet fes .,,lie ,provided the Minnesota Commissioner of Health shall review and approve any required plumbing plans for the following: I. Hospitals, nursing homes, supervised living facilities and similar health care related facilities regulated by the Minnesota Department of Health-, 2. Buildings owned by the federal and state government, and 3. Projects of a special nature for which the Minnesota Commissioner of Health's review is requested by either the City or the State. Subd. 3. Except as provided in this Section, Rule 4715 of the Minnesota Plumbing Code shall apply to all plumbing systems subject to this Section. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation"' and Section 4.99 , entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: E. J. VanOverbeke By: Patricia E. Awada Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CHERRYWOOD KNOLL) - HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve or deny a Preliminary Planned Development for 36 lots on 12.1 acres for small-lot single family residential development with zero lot line construction, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. • To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision to create 36 lots on 12.1 acres of unplatted property, located at 502 Chapel Lane, south of Hwy 55 and northeast of Bur Oaks Park, in the northeast 1/4 of Section 12, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. FACTS: • The property is unplatted and contains a single-family residence. The site is largely wooded and has significant changes in elevation. An easterly extension of Chapel Lane is proposed to provide access to this development. The site is located in the airport Noise Zone IV, and the proposed use is considered conditional within that zone. • The Planned Development is proposed to allow for greater flexibility in site design and preservation of natural areas. Flexibility is requested on lot size, lot width, and minimum setbacks. The result is smaller lots averaging 7,400 square feet, clustered in the central and southern portion of the site, with the more heavily wooded north and western portions of the site designated as outlots. • Outlot B (1.2 acres) is proposed as park land dedication to the city; Outlot A (2.9 acres) will be left as open space. Both outlots will be left largely undisturbed except for the grading necessary for stormwater ponding. • The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the development proposal and recommended acceptance of a land dedication of the 1.2-acre Outlot B, with a conservation easement or similar non-development restriction on Outlot A. The APrC also recommended modifications to the Tree Preservation and Mitigation plans. The developer indicated they would work with staff to resolve the issues and make the changes requested. • The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 23, 1999, and did recommend approval, subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. ISSUES: • From a policy perspective, the issues are whether the requested flexibility should be granted for this site and the proposed PD, the findings relative to the location of the site within airport Noise Zone IV, and whether the architectural and design standards proposed are acceptable and sufficient. • The technical issues with the development include revisions to the tree preservation and mitigation plans and associated modifications to the stormwater pond, grading plan and / � utility plan. The developer has indicated agreement and willingness to comply with the list of recommended conditions. • In response to a question raised during the public hearing, the APC asked staff to check on school bus policies with regard to dead end streets. The school district has indicated that in order for the bus route to go down a street, they need to have a second way out, or in the case of a dead end street, a way to turn around. The proposed development does include cul-de- sacs that would be of sufficient size for emergency vehicles and school buses to turn around. • Comments from existing residents during the public hearing included concern about the small lot sizes and lack of a transition from existing larger lots to these smaller lots, and requests that landscaping be located along the south and east edges of the new development to create a buffer for existing residences. ATTACHMENTS: February 23, 1999 APC Minutes, pages through�. Staff Report, pages through Page 12 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION REZONING AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT Acting Chair Frank opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Subdivision (Cherrywood Knoll) and a Preliminary Planned Development to create 36 lots and two outlots on 12.1 acres at 502 Chapel Lane located at the east end of Chapel Lane, south of Highway 55 and northeast of Bur Oaks Park in the northeast 1/4 of Section 12. Planner Dudziak introduced this item. Ms. Dudziak highlighted the information presented in City staff s planning report dated February 17, 1999. Ms. Dudziak noted the background and history, the surrounding uses and the existing conditions of the subject property. Ms. Dudziak noted that the developer was attempting to balance the competinv objectives of preservation of significant woodlands and grades and the requirements under a straight zoning designation. The applicant addressed the Commission indicating that he was in agreement with the conditions noted in the planning report. An adjoining resident expressed his concern with the small lots and thought there should be a gradual change from the large existing parcels to the smaller size of the proposed lots. Residents of Bur Oak Hills addressed their concerns with respect to the size of the lots in comparison to their own and noted the apparent closeness of the buildings to their lots. Residents from Chapel Lane reiterated the concerns they had with access to the proposed site and particularly noted the traffic and safety issues that would result with the combination of the proposal by Hartford Financial Services previously addressed on the Commission's agenda. Acting Chair Frank closed the public hearing. In response to questions from the Acting Chair, Design Engineer Gorder believed the proposal would generate approximately 300 cars per day and noted that there is potential future access from Chapel Lane to Highway 55 to provide for a looping. There was additional discussion regarding the school district bussing activities and the need for more information concerning their policies. Member Miller questioned the location of the signal anticipated for Highway 55 and inquired whether it would be more advantageous to have the signal further east at the future connection between Chapel Lane and Highway 55. Mr. Gorder indicated that the location chosen by MnDOT was to align the frontage roads lying north and south of Page 13 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Highway 55. Mr. Gorder also noted that he would need information to determine whether this development combined with the Hartford Financial Services would meet the warrants for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of the frontage road with Highway 55. Acting Chair Frank expressed his concerns with the need for one builder to complete the development and questioned whether there were too many units being proposed. He also noted that the applicant should prepare individual landscape plans for each of the units. Member Steininger expressed his approval of the small lot concept. Member Miller moved, Member Huusko seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Cherrywood Knoll) to create 36 lots and two outlots on 12.1 acres at 502 Chapel Lane located at the east end of Chapel Lane, south of Highway 55 and northeast of Bur Oaks Park in the northeast 1/4 of Section 12, subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, DI, El, Fl, and G1 2. The property shall be platted. 3. Architectural designs and construction methods for new construction within the development should incorporate sound attenuation standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA as compared with a noise level of 65 DNL. This would require an inside noise level reduction of at least 20 dBA (DNL level minus required dBA level). 4. Front yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet. Side yard setbacks of zero are allowed on one side and a minimum setback distance of 15 feet shall be maintained between structures. Minimum rear yard setbacks shall be 15 feet. 5. The existing sheds shall be removed and all wells and septic tanks abandoned according to Dakota County and City requirements. 6. A homeowner's association shall be established for the maintenance of all building exteriors and landscaped areas and for the common ownership and maintenance of Outlot A. Page 14 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 7. Outlot A shall be conveyed to the homeowner's association with the filing of the final plat. 8. A permanent conservation easement shall be established for Outlot A. The conservation easement shall be dedicated by separate document and shall be recorded with the final plat. 9. A copy of the Homeowners' Association Restrictions and Covenants shall be submitted to the City for review prior to final subdivision approval. Landscaping 10. A landscape plan showing typical plantings for each unit shall be submitted prior to final subdivision approval. Grading 11. The developer shall construct a retaining wall on the slope between Lot 12 and Lots 4, 5, and 6 to provide a minimum of 20-foot wide flat backyard/ sideyard areas to better accommodate drainage. 12. Retaining walls shall be constructed of interlocking block system (i.e. Keystone or similar product) and shall be consistent throughout the development. 13. Any encroachment onto Outlot B as part of construction or grading of the development site should require prior approval by the City. Those portions of Outlot B disturbed by construction or grading of the development site should be restored by the developer in a manner deemed appropriate by the City. 14. Every effort shall be made to control erosion onto adjoining properties during development. The specific requirements of the City are to be considered as the minimum standard. 15. The developer shall obtain MnDOT permit approval for the proposed storrn water discharge into the Hwy. 55 right-of-way. Water Quality 16. On-site ponding shall be constructed to treat runoff prior to discharge to Pond GP-2. The excavation of the pond shall be conducted to include a 10-foot wide aquatic safety bench extending from the normal water level. Side slopes below the bench should not exceed 3:1. The pond shall have a minimum wet volume of.22 acre-feet. // Page 15 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING COMNUSSION 17. A cash water quality dedication in lieu of on site ponding shall be required for graded areas in the development that are not treated by the proposed pond. Access/Street Design 18. No parking shall be allowed along one side of the street within the development in the areas where the street width is 28 feet. 19. The developer shall obtain the required right-of-way along the south boundary of Parcel 010-06 to accommodate the Chapel Lane extension prior to final subdivision approval. Easements/Ric,,hts-of-Way/Permits 20. Prior to final subdivision approval, the developer shall obtain a grading, easement from the property owner of Parcel 010-06 for the proposed grading of Chapel Lane. 21. The development shall dedicate restricted access along the entire length of the subdivision adjacent to Hwy. 55 right-of-way, as required by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Tree Preservation 22. The tree preservation plan shall be revised and resubmitted prior to final subdivision approval. The revisions shall be as follows, according to the recommendations of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, and will be subject to the approval of the City Forester. A. The developer should redesign the storm water pond in Outlot A, as proposed by City Water Resources staff, in order to reduce tree removal. B. The water main installation should be rerouted to avoid impacts to Outlot B. A suggested new location would be either side of Lot 12 then west along the south lot lines of Lots 1, 2, and 3. C. The Tree Inventory/Tree Preservation Plan should be revised to show the correct placement of tree protection fencing at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone as defined by the city ordinance. Page 16 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING CONMSSION D. The proposed retaining wall behind Lots 13 and 14 should be field located with City Forestry staff to reduce construction impacts into Outlot B. E. No more than 50% of the mitigation trees should be of the same species. Tree mitigation planting is in addition to other landscape requirements of the city. F. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) should be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. G. The applicant should contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. Park and Trail Dedications 23. This development shall be responsible for a park land dedication consisting of Outlot B (1.2 acres). The developer shall convey Outlot B to the city free and clear of all encumbrances and shall be responsible to record the conveyance with the plat. 24. Trails dedication shall be fulfilled through payment of a cash dedication. The cash trails dedication is payable prior to release of the final plat for recording, at the rate in effect at that time. All voted in favor, except Member Steininger opposed. Member Miller moved, Member Tilley seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Planned Development to create 36 lots and two outlots on 12.1 acres at 502 Chapel Lane located at the east end of Chapel Lane, south of Highway 55 and northeast of Bur Oaks Park in the northeast 1/4 of Section 12, subject to the following amended conditions: 1. The Preliminary Planned Development shall consist of the plans submitted with this application and on file with the City. 2. A Final PD Agreement will be required prior to final subdivision approval that includes the following revised and final plans. Final Site Plan ll� Page 17 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING CONMSSION Final Architectural and Design Standards Final Landscape Plan Final Tree Preservation and Mitigation Plan 3. The term of this Preliminary Planned Development shall be five years. 4. The property shall be platted. 5. Architectural designs and construction methods for new construction within the development should incorporate sound attenuation standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA as compared with a noise level of 65 DNL. This would require an inside noise level reduction of at least 20 dBA (DNL level minus required dBA level). 6. Architectural and design standards shall include those submitted by the developer and shown in Exhibit A. Final design criteria shall be submitted to the City for review and approval with the final development plans. 7. Front yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet. Side yard setbacks of zero are allowed on one side and a minimum setback distance of 15 feet shall be maintained between structures. Minimum rear yard setbacks shall be 15 feet. 8. A landscape plan showing typical foundation plantings shall be submitted prior to final subdivision approval. 9. Retaining walls shall be constructed of a modular interlocking block system (i.e. Keystone or similar product) and shall be consistent throughout the development. 10. The proposed development shall be submitted to the school district for review and comment. All voted in favor, except Members Steininger and Anderson. lav i PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: February 17, 1999 CASE: 12-PS-12-12-98 APPLICANT: Heritage Development HEARING DATE: February 23, 1999 PROPERTY OWNER: John and Claudette Sexton PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision Rezoning to Planned Development LOCATION: 502 Chapel Lane COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I, Single Family Residential ZONING: A, Agriculture SUMMARY OF REQUEST Heritage Development is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Cherrywood Knoll) and a Preliminary Planned Development to create 36 lots and two outlots on 12.1 acres at 502 Chapel Lane located at the east end of Chapel Lane, south of Hwy. 55 and northeast of Bur Oaks Park in the northeast 1/4 of Section 12. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Subdivision: City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. /a l Planning Report - Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 2 D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." Planned Development: Chapter 11.20, Subd. 8, B., Determination, states: "In considering any petition for such district, the Planning Commission and the Council in the interests of carrying out the intent and purpose of this Subdivision, shall determine whether or not such planned development will: (1) better adapt itself to its physical and aesthetic setting and that of surrounding lands than does development of the underlying zoning district; (2) be feasible for the owner and developer economically to complete according to proposed plans; 1 � � Planning Report- Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 3 (3) benefit the community at large to a greater degree than would development of the underlying zoning district." BACKGROUNDIHISTORY The property is unplatted and contains a single-family residence in the central part of the site, which was constructed in 1966. There are also three sheds on the property which will be removed with the development. The existing residence is served by well and septic. EXISTING CONDITIONS The topography is hilly and the site is largely wooded. On the southern portion of the site the highest elevation is 902 and drops to 822 at the west boundary. The northern portion of the site has elevation changes from 864 sloping down to 822 at the northern boundary along Hwy. 55. An easterly extension of Chapel Lane is proposed to provide access to this development. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North- Hwy. 55 South - Bur Oak Hills development; zoned R-1 (Residential, Single Family); guided D-I (Single Family Residential) East - Bur Oak Hills development; zoned R-1; guided D-I West - Single Family Residences zoned A(Agriculture) and R-1; guided D-I and a contracting yard; zoned GB (General Business) and guided D-III (Residential Townhouse 6-12 units per acre). To the southwest is Bur Oaks Park. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Description of Proposal - This development is designed with small lots (averaging 7,400 sq. ft.) containing single-family detached homes clustered in the central and southern portion of the site. The proposed development includes deviations from several city code requirements that are typical for single-family developments. These deviations include minimum lot size, minimum lot width and street frontage, and side and front yard setbacks. Zero setbacks are proposed on one side for each lot. Front yard setbacks are proposed to be 20 feet. The Planned Development is proposed to allow for greater flexibility in site design and preservation of natural areas. The lots are clustered in the center with the more heavily wooded north and western portions of the site designated as outlots. Outlot B (1.2 acres) is proposed as park land dedication to the city; Outlot A (2.9 acres) will be left as open space. Both outlots will be left largely undisturbed except for the grading necessary for stormwater ponding. 423 Planning Report - Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 4 Compatibility with Surrounding Area- The proposed single-family use is consistent with the surrounding development and the use specified in the city's Comprehensive Guide Plan. With the smaller lots and reduced setbacks, however, the appearance and feel of this development will differ from the surrounding neighborhoods. The proposed development plan attempts to balance competing goals in the development of this site. The initial development plan submitted by the developer incorporated standard zoning requirements, but also required grading of most of the site. At staffs suggestion, the developer reworked the plan to limit the grading, and increase tree preservation, and the result is smaller lots and reduced setbacks while maintaining the single- family detached housing style at a density not exceeding three units per acre. Airport Noise Considerations—The City of Eagan considered airport noise as a factor in its Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan. The Metropolitan Council has adopted an Aviation Chapter in Metropolitan Development Guide that anticipates the impacts from the continued operation of the airport at its current location. The noise policy contours in Eagan place the subject property within Noise Zone IV. Within this area, infill residential development would be conditional. To approve such development in this area, the City Council would need to make acceptable findings concerning the following: 1. Specific nature of the proposed use, including the extent of outdoor activities. 2. Relationship of the proposed use to other planning considerations, including adjacent land use activities, consistency with overall comprehensive planning and relation to other metropolitan systems. 3. Frequency of exposure of proposed uses to aircraft overflight. 4. Location of proposed use relative to aircraft flight tracks and aircraft on-ground operating and maintenance areas. 5. Location, site design and construction restrictions to be imposed by the community of the proposed use with respect to reduction of exterior to interior noise transmissions and shielding of outdoor activities. 6. Method community will use to inform future occupant of proposed building of potential noise from aircraft operations. 7. Extent to which community restricts the building from having facilities for outdoor activities associated with the use. 8. Distance of proposed use from existing or proposed runways,parallel taxiways or engine run-up areas. With respect to the factual aspects of the findings, the property lies approximately 4.5 miles southeast of the nearest runway at the airport. On an annual average, approximately half of all arrivals and departures can be expected to use the runways to and from the southeast. Upon completion, approximately one-third of all arrivals and departures are expected to use the north- south runway. At current traffic levels, the airport handles approximately 500,000 operations annually. Because of the relationship of the property to the current departure and arrival procedures and the runway centerlines, a significant portion of the departures and arrivals will track over or /a� Planning Report - Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 5 near the property. The property is approximately six miles from the engine maintenance and run up area. (Issues#3, 4 and 8) While the Stage III airline fleet, federally mandated by the year 2000,will create less noise per operation than the current fleet, the future net affect of such reductions is not certain. As such, regional policy requires that cities take current noise levels into account until such time as reductions in actual noise result in a reduction of the policy contours. As part of its updated Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan, the City will depict the Metropolitan Council's noise policy contours on its land use and zoning maps. This will serve as notice to future occupants of the potential noise from aircraft operations. (Issue#6) If the City determines that findings concerning these conditions support the approval of this application, architectural designs and construction methods for new construction within the development should incorporate sound attenuation standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA as compared with a noise level of 65 DNL. This would require an inside noise level reduction of at least 20 dBA(DNL level minus required dBA level). (Issue#5) Density - The allowable density is set by the land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan. This property is designated D-I, which allows single-family residential development up to 3 units per acre. The proposed development has a gross density of 2.9 units per acre. The flexibility afforded under the Planned Development allows the area of open space to be counted towards the density of development on the site. Since the area of Outlot A contributes to the total unit count, it should perpetually remain undeveloped and in open space. To ensure this, a permanent conservation easement should be established for Outlot A. The conservation easement shall be dedicated by separate document and shall be recorded with the final plat. Lots - The developer proposes 36 lots in the central and southern portion of the site. The lots range in size from 6,050 square feet to 15,142 square feet. The average lot size is about 7,400 square feet (.17 acres). The existing residence is proposed to remain on Lot 9, and that lot is proposed to be 14,428 square feet in area. Most of the lots are about 55 feet in width, measured at the front setback line. Some of the odd- shaped and corner lots are wider than that. Some of the "pie-shaped" lots on the curves and cul- de-sac have street frontage less than 40 feet in length, with the shortest being 33.6 feet (Lot 29). Setbacks - This development is designed with small lots (averaging 7,400 sq. ft.) containing single-family detached homes constructed with a zero setback on one side. The zero lot line construction allows for smaller individual lots. By locating the structure at the lot line on one side, a more usable yard area is provided on the other side for each lot. Front yard setbacks are proposed to be 20 feet. The proposed 20-foot front yard setback should provide sufficient depth for vehicle parking on driveways without obstruction to the public right-of-way. Based on the site plan, the typical distance between structures for this development appears to be 15 feet. A minimum setback distance of 15 feet should be maintained between structures. /C� Planning Report - Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 6 The existing residence on Lot 9 is proposed be set back about ten feet from the proposed west and south lot lines. The existing house should be subject to the same minimum setbacks as the other lots and therefore, the west lot line of Lot 9 should be adjusted to provide a 15-foot setback from the existing structure. This adjustment should not adversely affect the lot size or setbacks for the adjacent lot (Lot 12). Architectural Standards - The developer has submitted a draft of architectural design criteria that would be incorporated into this development (Exhibit A). The architectural design criteria include details with regard to minimum_ building footprint and garage size, exterior building materials, roof pitch and colors. Other standards include provisions for variation in building designs and colors,restrictions on accessory equipment and buildings, and installation of trees. The developer would retain final approval of all architectural plans and exterior designs as well as all decks, fences, retaining walls and pools. The specifics of the design criteria are included in the attached exhibits and should be made a condition of the PD. Since this is a Planned Development, where flexibility in several areas is proposed, the City may wish to consider including other architectural and design standards in addition to those proposed by the developer. Some suggestions for the APC's consideration and discussion include what types of fencing will be allowed or should be prohibited? Should driveway surfaces be required to be concrete rather than bituminous? Are the exterior materials proposed acceptable? A minimum of three or four different building designs should be incorporated into the development. Final design criteria will need to be drafted and submitted to the City for review and approval with the final development plans. (See condition#6 under action item B). Homeowners' Association - A homeowner's association will be established and all units would be required to be association members. The association should provide for the maintenance of all building exteriors and landscaped areas and for the common ownership and maintenance of Outlot A. Outlot A shall be conveyed to the homeowners' association with the filing of the final plat. A copy of the association restrictions and covenants should be submitted to the City for review prior to final subdivision approval. Landscaping - A landscape plan is not typically required for single-family residential development. However, because this is a Planned Development with smaller lots and setbacks that deviate from typical single-family development, this development should be landscaped. In addition to the one tree per lot that the developer proposes in their design criteria, landscaping should include foundation plantings for each building. A landscape plan showing typical plantings should be submitted prior to final subdivision and final planned development approval. The developer has submitted a landscape plan that shows trees throughout the development as mitigation for tree removal exceeding the amount allowable under city ordinances. The mitigation is discussed further in the Tree Preservation section of this report. GradinWStorm Drainage - The preliminary grading plan is acceptable with some modifications. The preliminary grading plan shows a large 3:1 slope between the proposed house pad on Lot 12 Planning Report - Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 7 on the upslope and on Lots 4, 5, and 6 on the downslope, thereby creating a possible drainage problem for the house pads on the downslope. The developer should construct a retaining wall on the slope to provide a minimum of 20-foot wide flat backyard/sideyard areas to better accommodate drainage. The preliminary grading plan shows some grading on Parcel 010-06 where Chapel Lane is proposed to be extended to the east. The developer should obtain a grading easement from the property owner of Parcel 010-06 prior to final subdivision approval. Retaining walls should be constructed of a modular block system (i.e. Keystone or similar product), and should be consistent throughout the development. The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable. Storm water runoff from the development will drain via storm sewer to a storm water basin in the northwest corner of the site before discharging into the Hwy. 55 ditch. The developer should obtain MnDOT permit approval for the proposed storm water discharge into the Hwy. 55 right-of-way. Wetlands/Water Quality- This development is located within the watershed of Bur Oak Lake, a Class II indirect contact recreation water body. Runoff from the site will be discharged first to Pond GP-2, a 2-acre pond designated as a nutrient trap in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. Pond GP-2 in turn discharges via a lift station to Bur Oak Lake. The development parcel is very hilly, with a topographic difference of almost 100 feet from the south-central to the northwest corner of the property. In addition, the majority of the parcel is heavily forested. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the development parcel. On-site ponding should be constructed to treat runoff prior to discharge to Pond GP-2. The developer has proposed the stormwater pond to treat runoff from this development be located in the low area in the northwest corner of the site. The excavation should be conducted to include a 10-foot wide aquatic bench extending from the normal water level. Side slopes below the bench should not exceed 3:1. The pond should have a minimum wet volume of.22 acre-feet. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding should be required for graded areas in the development that are not treated by the proposed pond. Utilities - Sanitary sewer and water main is readily available for connection by the development within Chapel Lane along the west edge of the site. The developer should abandon all well and septic systems on site according to Dakota County and City standards. Access/Street Design - Public street access for the development will be from the eastward extension of Chapel Lane, currently a 2300-foot long dead end street. This development proposes to extend Chapel Lane another 1400 feet to the east and south. A future street connection from Chapel Lane to Hwy. 55 to the north may be provided with redevelopment of properties directly to the northwest of this site (parcels 010-06 and 020-03) and would shorten the length of the dead-end portion of Chapel Lane. The first segment of the proposed street is a 60-foot right-of-way; the second two segments are 50-foot right-of-way. The street should be constructed to city standards with concrete curb and gutter. The first segment should be 32 feet wide and the remaining portion should be 28 feet wide. A.? Planning Report - Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 8 The City Fire Marshal has reviewed the proposed access to the development. Although such a lengthy street with only one entry and exit point is not an ideal situation, the Fire Marshal has determined that emergency access is acceptable if no vehicle parking is allowed along one side of Chapel Lane within the development in the areas where the street width is 28 feet. Traffic generation is anticipated to be approximately 300 vehicles per day. Easements/Rights of Way/Permits - As mentioned above, the developer should obtain MnDOT permit approval for the proposed storm water discharge into the Hwy. 55 right-of-way. The developer should obtain the required right-of-way along the south boundary of Parcel 010-06 (approximately 5 feet in width) to accommodate the Chapel Lane extension prior to final subdivision approval. Tree Preservation - Approximately 75% of this site is covered with some type of significant vegetation. The north 1/3 and southwest % of the site has steep terrain with existing elevation changes from 814 feet to 902 feet. A tree inventory has been submitted that indicates there are 374 individual significant trees on site. Individual tree species include oak, birch, ash, hackberry, cottonwood, aspen, black cherry, boxelder, basswood, apple, and spruce. Diameters range from 6 inches to over 30 inches. There are also areas of this site that contain smaller hardwood and softwood deciduous trees growing between the individual 374 identified significant trees. Areas of this type of vegetation are located in the north part of Outlot B, southwest of Outlot A, and southwest of the existing residence. These areas are smaller in size than what would comprise a significant woodland, but they are an integral part of the vegetation of the entire site. The trees and woodlands of this development site make up what can be described as a typical mixed northern hardwoods stand. There is almost complete crown cover of the wooded area, with an ideal understory of mixed small trees, shrubs and forest groundcover. The southwest portion of this development is directly adjacent to the northeast portion of Bur Oaks Park. This is of particular concern as the southeast wooded hillside of the development site is an important viewshed from most of the park. This heavily wooded hillside is visible from both the south part of Bur Oaks Park (a critical view across the lake) and from the north part of Bur Oaks Park (from the playground and picnic area). Staff feels that it is critical to preserve this viewshed. The development as proposed will result in the removal of 188 significant trees (50.3% of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation ordinance, allowable removal for this type of development (multiple-lot single-phase single-unit residential) is set at 40% (150 trees). With a significant tree removal in excess of allowable limits, mitigation will be required. As the development is currently proposed, tree mitigation calculates to one hundred (100) Category B trees (or an equivalent number of Category A or Category C trees) or a cash mitigation of $30,000.00. The City Forester feels there is still an opportunity to reduce tree removal on this site. For this reason, staff finds the Tree Preservation Plan unacceptable as submitted. Recommendations for revising the Tree Preservation Plan were detailed for and discussed by the Advisory Parks and Planning Report - Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 9 Recreation Commission (APrQ at their regular meeting on February 11, 1999. The APrC recommended that the following conditions be applied to this development proposal and that the Tree Preservation Plan be revised accordingly and resubmitted. 1) The developer should redesign the storm water pond in Outlot A, as proposed by City Water Resources staff, in order to reduce tree removal. 2) The water main installation should be rerouted to avoid impacts to Outlot B. A suggested new location would be either side of Lot 12 then west along the south lot lines of Lots 1, 2, and 3. 3) The Tree Inventory/Tree Preservation Plan should be revised to show the correct placement of tree protection fencing at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone as defined by the city ordinance. 4) The proposed retaining wall behind Lots 13 and 14 should be field located with City Forestry staff to reduce construction impacts into Outlot B. 5) No more than 50% of the mitigation trees should be of the same species. Tree mitigation planting is in addition to other landscape requirements of the city. 6) Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) should be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 7) The applicant should contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. Parks and Recreation - The City may require park dedication to be fulfilled either through a dedication of land (10% of the site) or through a cash payment. The developer is proposing to dedicate the 1.23-acre Outlot B to the City to fulfill the park dedication requirement. Outlot A, which consists of 2.9 acres, including the required ponding, is proposed to be transferred to the homeowners' association as undeveloped open space. The APrC reviewed this proposal at their regular meeting on February 11, 1999. The APrC recommended that the 12.1-acre development be responsible for land dedication of 1.2 acres (10%) and that a conservation easement be established for Outlot A. The APrC also recommended trails dedication be fulfilled through a payment of a cash dedication. Cash dedications for residential developments are payable prior to release of the final plat for recording and are payable at the rate in effect at that time. The 1999 City Fee Schedule specifies a rate of$163.00 per unit for trails dedication. In addition to the land and trails dedications, the APrC recommended the following with regard to grading and construction activities: • Any encroachment onto Outlot B as part of construction or grading of the development site should require prior approval by the City. Those portions of Outlot B disturbed by construction or grading of the development site should be restored by the developer in a manner deemed appropriate by the City. • Every effort should be made to control erosion onto adjoining properties during development. The specific requirements of the City are to be considered as the minimum standard. /C;�_ Planning Report -Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 10 SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Heritage Development is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Cherrywood Knoll) and a Preliminary Planned Development to create 36 lots and two outlots on 12.1 acres. The severe topography and wooded condition of the site present challenges for development. The applicant has attempted to balance the competing objectives of preservation and development through the flexibility afforded by the Planned Development. The density of the proposed development is 2.9 units per acre, which is within the maximum three units per acre allowed by the D-I designation in the Comprehensive Plan. The technical issues with the development include revisions to the tree preservation and mitigation plans and associated modifications to the stormwater pond, grading plan and utility plan. From a policy perspective, the issues are whether the requested flexibility should be granted for this site and the proposed PD, the location of the site within airport Noise Zone IV, and whether the architectural and design standards proposed are acceptable and sufficient. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED A. To recommend approval or denial of a Preliminary Subdivision to create 36 lots on 12.1 acres on unplatted property at 502 Chapel Lane, south of Hwy. 55 and northeast of Bur Oaks Park in the northeast 1/4 of Section 12. If approved the following conditions should apply: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, Dl, El, Fl, and G1 2. The property shall be platted. 3. Architectural designs and construction methods for new construction within the development should incorporate sound attenuation standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA as compared with a noise level of 65 DNL. This would require an inside noise level reduction of at least 20 dBA(DNL level minus required dBA level). 4. Front yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet. Side yard setbacks of zero are allowed on one side and a minimum setback distance of 15 feet shall be maintained between structures. Minimum rear yard setbacks shall be 15 feet. 5. The existing sheds shall be removed and all wells and septic tanks abandoned according to Dakota County and City requirements. 6. A homeowner's association shall be established for the maintenance of all building exteriors and landscaped areas and for the common ownership and maintenance of Outlot A. 130 Planning Report- Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 11 7. Outlot A shall be conveyed to the homeowner's association with the filing of the final plat. 8. A permanent conservation easement shall be established for Outlot A. The conservation easement shall be dedicated by separate document and shall be recorded with the final plat. 9. A copy of the Homeowners' Association Restrictions and Covenants shall be submitted to the City for review prior to final subdivision approval. Landscaping 10. A landscape plan showing typical plantings for each unit shall be submitted prior to final subdivision approval. Gradin 11. The developer shall construct a retaining wall on the slope between Lot 12 and Lots 4, 5, and 6 to provide a minimum of 20-foot wide flat backyard/ sideyard areas to better accommodate drainage. 12. Retaining walls shall be constructed of interlocking block system (i.e. Keystone or similar product) and shall be consistent throughout the development. 13. Any encroachment onto Outlot B as part of construction or grading of the development site should require prior approval by the City. Those portions of Outlot B disturbed by construction or grading of the development site should be restored by the developer in a manner deemed appropriate by the City. 14. Every effort shall be made to control erosion onto adjoining properties during development. The specific requirements of the City are to be considered as the minimum standard. 15. The developer shall obtain MnDOT permit approval for the proposed storm water discharge into the Hwy. 55 right-of-way. Water Quality 16. On-site ponding shall be constructed to treat runoff prior to discharge to Pond GP-2. The excavation of the pond shall be conducted to include a 10-foot wide aquatic safety bench extending from the normal water level. Side slopes below the bench should not exceed 3:1. The pond shall have a minimum wet volume of.22 acre-feet. 17. A cash water quality dedication in lieu of on site ponding shall be required for graded areas in the development that are not treated by the proposed pond. Access/Street Design 18. No parking shall be allowed along one side of the street within the development in the areas where the street width is 28 feet. 131 Planning Report - Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 12 19. The developer shall obtain the required right-of-way along the south boundary of Parcel 010- 06 to accommodate the Chapel Lane extension prior to final subdivision approval. Easements/Riehts-of-Way/Permits 20. Prior to final subdivision approval, the developer shall obtain a grading easement from the property owner of Parcel 010-06 for the proposed grading of Chapel Lane. 21. The development shall dedicate restricted access along the entire length of the subdivision adjacent to Hwy. 55 right-of-way, as required by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Tree Preservation 22. The tree preservation plan shall be revised and resubmitted prior to final subdivision approval. The revisions shall be as follows, according to the recommendations of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, and will be subject to the approval of the City Forester. a. The developer should redesign the storm water pond in Outlot A, as proposed by City Water Resources staff, in order to reduce tree removal. b. The water main installation should be rerouted to avoid impacts to Outlot B. A suggested new location would be either side of Lot 12 then west along the south lot lines of Lots 1, 2, and 3. c. The Tree Inventory/Tree Preservation Plan should be revised to show the correct placement of tree protection fencing at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone as defined by the city ordinance. d. The proposed retaining wall behind Lots 13 and 14 should be field located with City Forestry staff to reduce construction impacts into Outlot B. e. No more than 50% of the mitigation trees should be of the same species. Tree mitigation planting is in addition to other landscape requirements of the city. f. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) should be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. g. The applicant should contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. Park and Trail Dedications 23. This development shall be responsible for a park land dedication consisting of Outlot B (1.2 acres). The developer shall convey Outlot B to the city free and clear of all encumbrances and shall be responsible to record the conveyance with the plat. /3cZ Planning Report - Heritage Development February 23, 1999 Page 13 24. Trails dedication shall be fulfilled through payment of a cash dedication. The cash trails dedication is payable prior to release of the final plat for recording, at the rate in effect at that time. B. To recommend approval or denial of a Preliminary Planned Development, rezoning from Agriculture, to creating 36 lots for single-family development with deviations to setbacks, lot size and lot width. If approved, the following conditions should apply: 1. The Preliminary Planned Development shall consist of the plans submitted with this application and on file with the City. 2. A Final PD Agreement will be required prior to final subdivision approval that includes the following revised and final plans. • Final Site Plan • Final Architectural and Design Standards • Final Landscape Plan • Final Tree Preservation and Mitigation Plan 3. The term of this Preliminary Planned Development shall be five years. 4. The property shall be platted. 5. Architectural designs and construction methods for new construction within the development should incorporate sound attenuation standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA as compared with a noise level of 65 DNL. This would require an inside noise level reduction of at least 20 dBA(DNL level minus required dBA level). 6. Architectural and design standards shall include those submitted by the developer and shown in Exhibit A. Final design criteria shall be submitted to the City for review and approval with the final development plans. 7. Front yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet. Side yard setbacks of zero are allowed on one side and a minimum setback distance of 15 feet shall be maintained between structures. Minimum rear yard setbacks shall be 15 feet. 8. A landscape plan showing typical foundation plantings shall be submitted prior to final subdivision approval. 9. Retaining walls should be constructed of a modular interlocking block system (i.e. Keystone or similar product) and should be consistent throughout the development. /,-?3 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 131�1 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised:_ July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2, 1993 LTS#5 STANDARD.CON /`-+� FINANCIAL OBLIGATION— CHERRYWOOD KNOLL There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $-0- on the parcel proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. This estimated financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Water Trunk SF $9201LOT 36 Lots $33,120 TOTAL $ 33,120 Location Map i N N .2 N 4 ' � • ■ Wt■r a AMN Ln ' r■ ' 1 �, T Nwr•No.ss • t � I i ti • ■ ■ - � t. �: ■ . ■ ■ ■' BAR mr.cr. 87.4 • CIRCLE � ■ 1 ■ uuR uw■ ! ®�► o�> i Ate �1 4 •m ouc oa 4 � � '� 3 Sub"ect Site 4 = a °��M"'°e ten, '° • snit we■' t H ° t � h■asioe o¢ ■i o C � TW P i z C ' jMll•o.. O = L M° r,"KEE DOODLE RD.) = 1000 0 1000 FW Development/Developer: Cherrywood Knoll Application: Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision Case No.: 12-RZ-09-12-98 and 12-PS-12-12-98 2 N 1J D,*ot3 Coxtyy LLaiddSS�m�""DapaUr■nt�aidis�a,r�ent'as d 0ec■rb■rl� *city of Eagan w F Com m9yD"Op—rgD partn-R THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY S ity of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map • . . . Knoll Application: Subdivision ��. ■ • =Jim OMEN ��• � '"� Vii: . Its . . • ,��' is FA NOW ��iiii■�i * r��R�Vii►:�:� HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT DRAFT Cherrywood Knoll City of Eagan Design Criteria A. Required Minimum House Sizes: (all footage's are in the footprint of the house ) Rambler 1500 sq. ft. Two Story 1000 sq. ft. ( 1800 sq. ft. finished footage, w/FULL BASEMENT) B. Garage Standards: 1. 2 car minimum, 24'X 24'. 2. Raised panel garage doors. C. Exterior Building Material Standards: 1. One half of front elevation in brick or stone. 2. Siding-Natural materials, wood;Presidential vinyl, aluminum; brick, stone or stucco. Masonite hardboard is not allowed. 3. Roof pitch of at Least 8/12. 4. Developer MUST approve all architectural plans and exterior designs. D. Misc. Standards: 1. Identical house colors and elevations WILL NOT he allowed on adjacent lots. 2. All house colors MUST be coordinated using natural earth tones. 3. Exterior television or radio antennas or dishes WILL NOT be allowed DSU satellite dishes are allowed. 4. Driveways will be paved from the street to the garage in asphalt,brick, or concrete. 5. All lots must be fully sodded from the back of the curb to 30' behind the house within 30 days of the closing OR funds will be escrowed to when weather permits the lot to be sodded. 6. Out buildings are not permitted. (i.e. sheds, unattached garages) 7. Developer approval is required on all decks, fences, retaining walls and pools. 8. Buyer agrees to purchase and install tree(s) and plantings with species, location and size which comply with city approved landscape plan for subdivision. 9. All units MUST be members of the association. /3D 450 East County Road D•little Canada,MN 55117 •Phone:(612)481-0017•Fax:(612)481-1518 •Toll Free:(800)644-0017 909 Blackstone Avenue•Waukesha,WI 53186 •Toll Free:(800)644-0017 •Phone:(414)322-4789 110 North Cherry,Suite 240•Olathe,KS 66061 •Tod Free:(800)644-0017 •Phone:(816)769-2054 O 6 py P nR f Fi aT ;.�n'• :, i� i x •�pl its w .:�. i�g ^stre. � .e ►� �p� <�< �7'} �r�iF �sFi ��:i? st�0 �• 4• • i � ,k;2:I iT r- � ' 11 y < °i - (00 — — — — — — CE �i 1 � G �44444oYYY lx;l i' i,i J � 'F � r Z �aaaaaaaaa A kilti,��i�tllk � � t s f�=� a• ( a 1 I � h•'[:ltlll�kp i ..L :Jlfl�hFxki!F � � r��=• l ,OC'1LL 71l,L0.00S pa'• ar I eo�oc•o $ -"'n pd ppf y �F� •• a �� c—:! r =. •` / e ik it ° .�: _ Oi* sir L•� w� IT ZZ, _ b .` �.t p ..ate• mss. y .�— p1� fir{ �� i �..� � ♦ i. e (a77a).crag(n•7m),Ls sro 7.0s. a ig 1 Ek9 r � N L � / PRELIMINARY PLAT tT o gi I t Oil 1 :i Ip I I t -E--E 7-1 It jig PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN O � as sc j j ' � ..r t 'ez�p�' 1;.(_i pyl:`; � :E_s° - Ei fFf p7" PF '� I�Jw is zI I i iii Fit, t ;tilt! !i3 fill it 11j10 !;j.l -1 u t,it }t, lid T T ;j EXISTING CONDITIONS t, . 1 • ) i d o� iJ{ttiil,;a�i � �.—, i rpt' � ► ' I t�3 A 1!t!{Rt iltl g 54 1►;ti-!'{i:tT1E Z � d r.J e�ai tri, w s• ,�i 1rL � J lJJjtll��e�t!t k�Ei olid �k I I I / I - - - - - - ` I- - - - - - � - - I .DS'LLL l J!,LO.00S �. •` i'F4�, - db~ w¢ ^iii •�. °O'` p,ei ', 4ltr i 'rl r , eF/\ \ I, A I }`• � a fll_ r o O a � fig{ - �� 4•,, a tR- ' � l.it.N.00r � �•S� � �R. r �_ a moi! e (aasa) ,oveps- (rr»r)Aer, 5a rr.t.Tr or(W-) aT(0m) •1- — — — 1 - _ SITE PLAN V uj 71 AN At if ya t 47, 1 1 0 tillII II I 4 IIfill Se�Y iee ��D ii t R ?i I � ( ' W I'iqq• �r� Y ' j� In jib. � /d J {. �ill��1''�l\'� ��>�T � �R I. I J � ice' 1? 1 J.S // � ��s�� "` ice! -� H�\ ' i � I j r. as it kmi PRELIMINARY GRADING/DRAINAGE '7 0 Z P Ith L;1 f- OPP IF 7 4 \0 LANDSCAPE PLAN A VIA lit lliW lit,i J p / , . O T . .......... Of m Z LU It I �9tl.T T1 w 3(RU) P t P+ HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT January, 1999 Written Narrative Submittal Requirement. - Cherrywood Knoll Heritage Development of Minnesota, Inc. is proposing the development of 36 single-family "Garden" lots on a 12.1-acre parcel of land located at the east end of Chapel Lane and bordered on the north by State Trunk Highway#55. This property is zoned agricultural and is guided in the 12/31/96, "City of Eagan- Comprehensive Plan" as D-1-Single-family(0-3 units/acre). Our proposal is for the development of a density of 2.97 units/acre. Our proposal is an attempt to blend environmental sensitive and lifestyle housing for the ever increasing "empty nester". By reducing the home, lot and setback sizes, we have been able to produce a plan which allows the wooded northern slope to remain largely undisturbed and contributes 1.2 acres of park land to the City of Eagan adjacent to the City's current park location. Additional, these garden style homes and lots, which have been constructed in other communities such as Apple Valley and Inver Grove Heights, allow long time residents of Eagan the option of remaining in the community where they have raised their families, while recognizing their reduced housing needs. Needs which still include the desire to stay in a detached single-family dwelling. The entire proposal will accommodate these residents reduced desire for upkeep of their property by providing an association to manage,plow, mow and landscape their individual properties. While these homes are smaller in size their value and amenities remain high and well protected by their design, association management and architectural control. We are planning on having all governmental approvals completed in time for a single phase construction in the Spring of 1999, with the construction of the first homes by August of 1999. Currently, the property has one single-family residence with a well and septic system. Our proposal includes the platting of this existing home within the sub-division. Unique to the property are elevation changes of 60 feet and a singular access point of Chapel Lane. Much of the area with the greatest elevation change, occurs on the wooded northerly portion of the property which borders Highway 55. Within 600', three sides of the property are surrounding by existing residential land uses. On the remaining northern side is Highway#55. Within about 700' and located just off of Highway#55 and a gravel road called Lois Lane is an existing business with some large hauling equipment. Thomas Von Bische, Director 450 East County Road D•Me Canada,MN 55117 •Phone:(612)481-0017 •Fax:(612)481-1518 •Toll Free:(800)644-0017 909 Blackstone Avenue.Waukesha,WI 53186 •Ton Free:(800)644-0017•Phone:(414)322-4789 .,n u_Y i,�__. n..u_ n.n �,_,�_ .... ..ni• t_x�___.ienn .. nni� _ nom___. .n, ..,.n nn�. Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting C. REZONING & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (OAK BLUFFS) MANLEY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ➢ To approve or deny a Rezoning of approximately 16.4 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located east of Dodd Road and north of Diffley Road, in the south 1/2 of Section 24. ➢ To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision entitled the "Oak Bluffs" located east of Dodd Road and north of Diffley Road, in the south 1/2 of Section 24. subject to the conditions listed in the APC meeting minutes. FACTS: ➢ The subject property currently overlays four, unplatted parcels of land and is occupied by three single family residences. ➢ Approval of the subdivision as proposed will grant the applicant a variance to allow the creation of several lots without public street frontage. ➢ At their regular meeting on February 23, 1998, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision and recommended approval of the rezoning and denial of the preliminary subdivision on a split vote ISSUES: ➢ At the APC hearing, the Commission Members voiced concern over the alignment of Jacob Court and its intersection with Dodd Road. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: Minutes of the February 23, 1999 APC meeting, pagesAl�hrough� Staff report, pages/,V through 11J. /110 U Page 18 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING CON USSION REZONING AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MANLEY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION Acting Chair Frank opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Rezoning of approximately 16.4 acres from A (Agriculture) to R-1 (Single Family) and a Preliminary Subdivision (Oak Bluffs) to create 36 lots, located on the northeast corner of Diffley Road and Dodd Road in the SW1/4 of Section 24. Planner Kirmis introduced this item. Mr. Kirmis highlighted the information presented in City staff s planning report dated February 17, 1999. Mr. Kirmis noted the background and history, the surrounding uses and the existing conditions of the subject property. Mr. Kirmis addressed the concern with the alignment of Jacob Court and its intersection with Dodd Road. Mr. Kirmis also referenced the need for a variance to allow a number of lots without public street frontage. The developer addressed the Commission initially referencing that the proposed layout provides for a better neighborhood than if Jacob Court were to be relocated. A property owner lying east of the proposed development expressed concern regarding the slopes from the southern cul-de-sac and inquired as to what steps would be taken to protect the grades. Design Engineer Gorder noted the requirement to preserve 3- to-1 slope. A resident inquired as to whether Dodd Road was intended to be upgraded as part of the development. Mr. Gorder responded that the Dodd Road improvement had been part of the City's five-year capital improvement program, but had been removed recently by the City Council from any intention to be upgraded. Discussion ensued concerning the design of Jacob Court cul-de-sac off of Dodd Road. Member Steininger and Acting Chair Frank expressed significant concern with respect to the lots laid out on the south edge of the property and the severe impact upon the grades. Each questioned whether the lots were buildable and without significant problems. Member Steininger moved, Member Huusko seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Rezoning of approximately 16.4 acres from A (Agriculture) to R-1 (Single Family). All voted in favor. ! T Page 19 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING CONMSSION Member Steininger moved to recommend approval of the Preliminary Subdivision with a revision to the road and lot configuration off of Dodd Road. City Attorney Dougherty interjected that the motion as stated would seek to approve a different plat than what is presently submitted by the applicant. Member Steininger moved, Member Tilley seconded, a motion to recommend denial of the Preliminary Subdivision (Oak Bluffs) to create 36 lots, located on the northeast corner of Diffley Road and Dodd Road in the SWI/4 of Section 24. All voted in favor, except two voted against the motion. Member Steininger reiterated his concern with the direct access for the cul-de-sac off of Dodd Road. 160 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: February 17, 1999 CASE: 24-PS-04-01-99 24-RZ-02-01-99 APPLICANT: Manley Brothers Construction HEARING DATE: February 23, 1999 PROPERTY OWNERS: David Eckel PREPARED BY: Bob Kirmis Lawrence Oldenberg James and Jennifer Meyer George and Britta Doerfler REQUEST: Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision LOCATION: (SW '/4 of section 24) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Mixed Residential (D-II) ZONING: Agriculture (A) SUMMARY OF REQUEST Manley Brothers Construction is requesting Preliminary Subdivision approval to allow the creation of a 36 lot single family residential subdivision entitled "Oak Bluffs". The proposed subdivision overlays 16.4 acres of land located east of Dodd Road and north of Diffley Road in the south ''/z of Section 24. In conjunction with the requested preliminary subdivision, the applicant has also requested a Rezoning of the property from an A, Agriculture to an R-1, Residential Single Family zoning designation. The request also includes a Variance to allow a number of parcels without public street frontage. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Rezoning: City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 5 states, in part that the Council shall not rezone any land or area in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this /,S—/ Planning Report—Manley Brothers February 23, 1999 Page 2 chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for it's consideration and recommendation. Subdivision: City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. /_S� Planning Report—Manley Brothers February 23, 1999 Page 3 K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization"which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the"Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." BACKGROUND/HISTORY The 16.4 acre property in question currently overlays four individual, unplatted parcels of land and is occupied by three single family residences. The site is presently zoned A, Agriculture and a rezoning of the property to R-1, Residential Single Family is necessary. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site has a topographic difference of over 90 feet from the southwest to the northeast. The eastern portion of the subject site holds both significant vegetation and slopes. Some mature vegetation also exists along the site's southern property line (along Diffley Road). As previously indicated, the property is currently occupied by three single residences (corresponding to existing parcel configurations). No wetlands exist on the site. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Single Family Residential (Country Hollow); zoned R-1, Single Family Residential; guided D-II, Mixed Residential (0-6 units/acre) South - Eagan Fire Station#4 and Single Family Residential; zoned PF, Public Facilities and R- 1, Single Family Residential; guided PF, Public Facilities and D-II, Mixed Residential (0-6 units/acre). East - Single Family Residential; zoned R-1, Single Family Residential; guided D-II, Mixed Residential (0-6 units/acre) West - Single Family Residential; zoned PD, Planned Development and R-1, Single Family Residential; guided D-II, Mixed Residential (0-6 units/acre) �5� Planning Report—Manley Brothers February 23, 1999 Page 4 EVALUATION OF REQUEST Rezoning The requested rezoning from A, Agriculture to R-1, Residential Single Family is necessary to allow this subdivision of the property. The proposed R-1 zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan which designates this property for D-II, Mixed Residential use (0-6 units/acre). Preliminary Subdivision Compatibility with Surrounding Area- The subject site is bounded on the north, east, and west by single family residential uses. The proposed addition of single family residential uses of comparable density to the area is not anticipated to adversely affect surrounding land uses. Thus, the proposed use is considered compatible with existing and anticipated surrounding land uses. Density - A total of 36 dwelling units have been proposed upon the subject 16.4 acre property. This results in a density of 2.2 units per acre, consistent with the density of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Subdivision Design - Generally speaking, the proposed subdivision design is considered positive and responds well to various site design parameters including existing vegetation and topography. One concern that does exist however, relates to proposed Jacob Court. While Jacob Court does align with Oxford Road to the west, consideration should be given to relocating the cul-de-sac to be provided "interior" access from Ethan Drive to the east. Such modification would result in the following: ➢ The elimination of an additional access point along a "neighborhood collector" street (Dodd Road). ➢ The elimination of what may be considered an isolated neighborhood exposed to traffic noise and headlights (from Dodd Road and Oxford Road). Attached as an exhibit to this report is a subdivision design alternative (prepared by staff) which illustrates a manner in which the cul-de-sac could be relocated. It should be recognized however, that the proposed cul-de-sac relocation would alter ponding locations on the site and may result in the loss of one lot. A determination regarding the acceptability of the proposed cul-de-sac location is considered a policy matter. Lots - Within R-1 zoning districts, a minimum lot area requirement of 12,000 is required. Lots within the proposed subdivision range from 12,130 to 32,298 square feet with an average size lot measuring 17,162 square feet in size. Thus, the minimum area requirements of the City Code Planning Report—Manley Brothers February 23, 1999 Page 5 have been satisfactorily met. Likewise, all lots have been found to meet or exceed the minimum R-1 district lot width requirement of 85 feet. As shown on the submitted preliminary subdivision, a total of eight lots are to be provided access via a private street. Such private street responds to the applicant's desire to include the southernmost parcel within the development and minimize tree removal. To allow the creation of lots that are not afforded public street frontage, the approval of a variance is necessary. Details related to the proposed private street will be addressed in a latter section of this report. Setbacks - The following minimum setbacks are applicable to the proposed development: From Diffley Road 50 feet From Dodd Road 40 feet Front yard Local Street 30 feet Private Street 20 feet Side yard 10 feet Rear yard 15 feet All proposed lots demonstrate an ability to comply with the aforementioned setbacks. Gradin - The preliminary grading plan is acceptable with some modifications. A majority of the site will be graded for development. The backyard areas of the proposed lots along the north and east edges of the development will remain mostly undisturbed. The preliminary grading plan shows a graded slope in excess of the City standard of 3:1 near the end of the private street cul- de-sac. The final grading plan should be revised to reflect graded slopes of 3:1 or gentler throughout the development. Storm Drainage - The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable with some modifications. Most of the development's storm water runoff will drain to the northwest through two constructed storm basins before discharging into the east ditch line of Dodd Road, where it then enters the City storm sewer system within Dodd Road approximately 250 feet to the north. The developer should construct storm sewer from the development to this existing storm sewer system. The developer should construct the proposed storm water ponds on the site so as to control the rate of post-development runoff to be less than or equal to pre-development rates. Catch basins should also be added over the storm sewer culvert at Jacob Court to capture storm water runoff before it reaches Dodd Road. tilities - The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. Sanitary sewer and water main are available within Dodd Road and Diffley Road for connection by this development. The site is located within two different water main pressure zones as identified by the City Water Supply and Distribution Plan (1996). There should be no water main connection between the two water pressure zones. /5s Planning Report—Manley Brothers February 23, 1999 Page 6 Streets/Access/ Circulation - Street access for a majority of the development is via two public streets to be constructed with this development, Ethan Drive and Jacob Court. These streets intersect with Dodd Road along the west edge of the site. Lots 14-23, Block 1 are proposed to be served via a private street (Lexie Court). The private street should be a minimum of 24 feet wide (face-to-face of curb) as required by City Code. The City's Subdivision Code states that as a general rule, the City shall not permit land-locked parcels or parcels that are served only by private easements. Since access for Lots 14-23, Block 1 would be provided by the private street, the preliminary subdivision request includes a variance to allow parcels that do not have public street frontage. The developer should prepare a private ingress-egress easement document for the proposed private street for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to final subdivision approval. This easement should be recorded with the final plat. Public street access is not proposed onto Diffley Road (Dakota County Road 30) to the south. Dakota County will require that restricted access be provided along the entire south boundary of the plat for this subdivision. Easements/Permits/Right-of-Way- The developer will be responsible for obtaining Dakota County permit approval for any grading or utility work within the Diffley Road right-of-way. Water Quality/Wetlands - The subject site is located within the watershed of Fish Lake, a Class I direct contact recreation water body. Runoff from the site will be discharged first to Pond JP-22, a 0.4-acre pond designated as a stormwater basin in the City's water quality management plan. Pond JP-22 in turn discharges through a series of several ponds and lakes and then via a lift station to Fish Lake. It is recommended that on-site ponding be provided to treat this runoff prior to discharge to Pond JP-22 and then to Fish Lake. The grading plan shows two stormwater ponding areas constructed in the north-central portion of the site to treat runoff from this development. The excavation should be conducted to include a 10 foot wide safety bench just below the normal water elevation and that the side slope below the bench not exceed 3:1. The ponds should have a combined minimum wet volume of.5 acre-feet. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding for graded areas not treated by proposed ponding areas is recommended. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the development parcel. Tree Preservation - The submitted tree inventory indicates that there are 35 significant trees on site. Tree species include 21 oaks (6"to 40" diameter), 5 spruce (20' to 25' height), 3 pine (25' height), 2 ash (13" and 17" diameter), 3 elm (16" diameter each), and 1 silver maple (24" diameter). There are also 847,315 square feet of significant woodlands on the site. All of these woodlands are located on the east half of the site, most of them on slopes dropping to the east or in ravines. Development of this site as proposed will result in the removal of 14 significant trees (40% of the /�v Planning Report—Manley Brothers February 23, 1999 Page 7 total) and in the removal of 48,497 square feet of significant woodlands (5.7% of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable removal for this type of development, (multiple-lot single-phase single-unit residential) is set at 40%. With a significant tree removal equal to or less than allowable limits, there is no tree mitigation required for this development. There are five large bur oak trees located in Lots 20, 21, and 22 of this development. Tree numbers and associated diameters of these trees are as follows: #1 30" diameter(wind related crown damage) #2 30" diameter(wind related crown damage) #3 30" diameter #4 20" diameter #5 40" diameter According to Tree Preservation Ordinance definitions, any oak tree 30" and larger is considered a Specimen Tree. Preservation of these unique trees is highly recommended. Lot 22 contains three of these large oaks (#3, #4, and #5). The submitted plan indicates that the proposed house pad will be within twenty feet of the trunk of all of these trees. The City's standard tree protection requirements state that tree protection areas shall be set up at a distance of one foot per one inch trunk diameter of trees to be preserved. The submitted plan does not allow for this. In order to allow for sufficient distance between preserved trees and construction activities, it is recommended that lot lines for Lots 19, 20, 21, and 22 be shifted 20 feet to the east. This will shift will allow sufficient root protection area to increase chances of long-term survival of these specimen oaks. Parks - Cash park and trail dedication will be required for the newly created lots. For 1999, a cash park dedication fee of$1,235 per unit is required while a dedication of$163 per unit is required for trailway dedication. Airport Noise Considerations - The subject property lies outside of the airport noise exposure zones established by the Metropolitan Council. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed 36 lot single family residential subdivision is consistent with the land use directives of the comprehensive plan and is considered compatible with existing and anticipated uses in the area. In consideration of site topography and mature tree locations, variance from the public street frontage requirement appears justified. Planning Report—Manley Brothers February 23, 1999 Page 8 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED A. To recommend approval or denial of a Rezoning of approximately 16.4 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located north of Diffley Road and east of Dodd Road, in the SW 1/4 of Section 24 B. To recommend approval or denial of a Preliminary Subdivision (Oak Bluffs), with a Variance to allow the creation of lots without public street frontage, on property located north of Diffley Road and east of Dodd Road, in the SW 1/4 of Section 24. If approved, the following conditions should apply: 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: B1, 2, 3, 4 Cl, 2, 3 D1 E1 2. The property shall be platted. 3. City Officials shall find the proposed Jacob Court cul-de-sac location to be acceptable. 4. The developer shall prepare a private ingress-egress easement document for the proposed private street for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to final subdivision approval. This easement shall be recorded with the final plat. 5. The final grading plan shall be revised to reflect graded slopes of 3:1 or gentler throughout the development. 6. The developer shall construct storm sewer from the development to this existing storm sewer system within Dodd Road approximately 250 feet to the north. 7. The developer shall construct the proposed storm water ponds on the site so as to control the rate of post-development runoff to be less than or equal to pre-development rates. 8. Catch basins shall be added over the storm sewer culvert at Jacob Court to capture storm water runoff before it reaches Dodd Road. 9. Water main connection between the two water pressure zones, as identified in the City Water Supply & Distribution Plan, shall not be allowed. 115-9 Planning Report—Manley Brothers February 23, 1999 Page 9 10. The private street shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide (face-to-face of curb) as required by City Code. 11. A revised plan shall be submitted that shifts the lot line locations of Lots 19, 20, 21, and 22 twenty feet to the east to increase the survival chances of several specimen oak trees. 12. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 13. Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plans shall be required at the time of building permit application for lots 19, 20, 21, and 22. 14. On-site ponding shall be constructed in the northwest corner of the site to provide on-site treatment for runoff from this parcel. The ponding excavation should incorporate a 10-foot wide aquatic bench extending from NWL to 1 foot below NWL and side slopes below the aquatic bench should be 4:1 to a maximum depth of 4 feet. The ponding shall have a minimum wet volume of 0.5 acre-feet 15. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding shall be required for the graded areas in the development that are not treated by the proposed ponding. 16. This proposal shall be subject to a cash parks dedication and cash trails dedication. v STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the'Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2, 1993 LTS#5 STANDARD.CON /0/000/ FINANCIAL OBLIGATION—OAK BLUFF ESTATES There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $16,681 on the parcel proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. This estimated financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Sanitary Sewer Trunk SF $880/Lot 36 Lots $31,680 Water trunk SF 18,528 Water lateral SF $22.10 315 FF 6,962 Storm Sewer Trunk (1) SF $.084/Sq Ft 287,409 Sq Ft 24,142 TOTAL $81,312 The area for storm sewer is not known at the present time. Adjustment will be made when areas of storm sewer easements are known. �'� �• © o �e©� © -offlop,yaw © ••�� ♦ �� ops©� 1�� c�ocae�Q ► �♦♦♦♦� ,� 100 MEN MINOR TAW �■ ��I �� ,�o�� ie�ce �� ice.•►. � �� ♦'i S�I O �� 011■� MFill - ra ILI E• e■ it L7E7 L �w OtJ iJE/ �•�' `�, �m Es� �. oo � n � .ate, � �� ■� 491 O©. �:' �-��JI Q�,® ��i© � �I�/1/nom:..•� �� i► © 7'��,�ter, Ego o012 Wp& E:G� ♦. e. � Vl%? Savin ©��■ W40 E`. I 0:31 oil NMI Sol 11111111 ... .16A- 13 ... Develop me nt/Developer. Oak Bluffs SubdivisionApplication: Rezoning and Preliminary 24-PS-04-01-99 +C ity of Eagan Lind and is cunwt as of O@cwrb8rl99& - Departrnert Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map . . . Oak Bluffs Application: . . Prelim. subdivision Ivy►', '�� '� • �''� ►� Current Zoning: rN PIP Agriculture NESS ME s � ■ r ��•''tom: � w��.�� . +��,�� Thr: •vim • 1 OAA 01.It�8 •vAdow aft boom a.w.laa�. 1OWS Alboa W �; laver Crew INIAhb, lOt ti60Tl (euY 464-� 1 Nj.j.�'C OF .. T___-- — ____ O 1 �� /// • //i/ '^ 1 5'� -------------- aver //// S /:'1 •..:� 6 / alar /� // ver -- --_____ ` f �,• � �---�'pr_J F------------- ORD RD. I r�asl I --------1 1 ' ♦ 1 \\ / / arm I var 6L ' aver . � yr 1 / ----------- ____-- �_- L-------------- i opf� VAN — / M ID 4 f 23 1 iI"`.` 1 —mm=& I---- I--- 1-----�--- •_� \ I I 1 1 20 — 1`_ va�r--alleaNw Jll.a.r I air _•^ DIFFLEY ROAD 1 "` ---- r.r.aamrn r*r r r MN r r•"-\ II �aJ• OAI�TA OMMW ROAD R/M YAP lid 136 -- •ei�'itf` D"do mmot Data raw v ua .................................w ave.a.vua................................................�u... w..r r..rrw.wrr+ �/ vavwuan.sr:..................��c w.+r r.r•F.+w ra alrw......................................... on.0 man r�.u�-` va / a«... ..r•rr.r. •w a•- _ I Iv� n .......... w T"IMA►rw aivn ana� ..................................... rw rvvn vmi \ ar...rrrw wrrrar rrwrr.rr r...rrr as a vrw.rr.w v..rrrar rlrrrwr r.rrr //j//) vert Wre..�r�.riww��n...r r.rarr � rt.nrrrw•wrrrrr r...wr / yr..r W=A Cz=VvOL rr.r d`' OW tom' ` PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION w-�•.n..wM -mow M • I rw�W-ti,�w..Y ti Y rr O_p rti r W r.r r.r•.+rr i i OA4 su,aPft lbd' w move=ommomo. lane �uwn w.� m Pimtawr Ceow IHl•ht.. 101 66077 (6L2)" 4M -------------- , 8' ��• /�/' l" ��•. S I .... I S SW_34 r -.i iii �1�"'y"•N. / -�-- \ '/' ' � �r I ... ' �J --------------- tl L C Oases r -\0A 7 � yr FORD RD. --------------- % i Q/y ,r- ��. 1, a '3 ----------r --------------------�Q`• . goy \' . a N_ I t ! I 7Ak I -- ---I at ----------------- DIFFL•EY ROAD ------------------ -- DAKOTA 0MKff W#a R/w YAP No. IM ft"" o•ot Data — .... ..... t1Ya rV I w . ..."...................... r{I../MY�RO......................tR A.1Kr N•r.r rtir q4 ........................�............r11 rM. >R4w.w.irt.a.n RM ...................... -` -_...................... w ..... ............................. ...r. •.r•.,rr+w rrrY.wrrl.rr a.+.rrr.x �rr V..a..p a wrr a.r•rra M��.•�r wrr r.4�.+ \ / U.W. A ft—71 w.rY Yes 10rr vr.A a--rr \ v.��r rr>•�.O.ry a rr r.+•�.• wr`�rrn..•Arr>.Ir rwrrr �.�r rr s�r.r.n,r..a r+ar•.rr.. y�w.• rrwsrN MI r r`r.r.+1�►.1./...r y IL a` Oka t G", Na SITE PLAN T4 L �•r.u1..r..r � l.H r..r..r r Q Iaso o rrrer R •00 rO•.r1 I... ' �.W.ti—./.r.M..Ir...rM Yti r W W..W�M.`r✓i.0 /nPRELIMMARY GRADING AND EROSMN C'ONTRO[, PLAN `/F O,4K �� GRAPHIC SCALE For �, 1 ��— rm�•_ __ Waal" 8-t IOT/9 A,Laoo f., inwr Or— He1aGU, MN SGC" (912) 454-49,L1 S., VAP b BENCHMARK lo � � �� "\ ,\ LROS:ON CONTROL NOTES 4 V� `1`, `I 1 7 _ � �, - •3` � - � � � � 1�i�`�. `'��ll'i�i. un ami nwvs+ao ------ p in RD. CON.STR:`c7T(0N OF A S(L' FENCE COLRT', LECENo AND v r ' LCT �^�• �1 _ . 9 � X12 �, � 37 \ 1 2 �® X � II '+u� �;x•-a .a - �\ 1`1,,1.1 1 � .. 1e"a—c.. ..,r V, 1 i g ROCK CUNSTE I C EN'F;S:'F, �` - ,�-- - __ /•-ate i 1 .. I ,�� oop w p� 1 --- — A1 4�,r, DIFFLEY ROAD j Y- t 6. R1p t 6ON6, INC. 9196 -.7�. :0��1 GRADING PLAN OAK BLJWS Port tu"Ift .ro,,.m CootioUgn �A ,_ ��•��f e� y 2211 a�.rsn/.rrs.n� --- t --- i Y -------------- $a song 03 ico � t v 119. ! f _ __ OXFORD RD------------ iaal Now --------------- rZt I t p �y ,r u.rw.a/trrann raw/a IcL�'• ,aa•.. ; ' O� ------------------------------ `- I �O kP w / -1 `*---- - l- cn m /.' 2 1 Ln a.-.w-M- M-M-----. -.--- --- --1 DIF=LFYR0AD - -= J•�s tt1� A+.t1/Md1' _._ ..._. .'�M'l7t`w�•.�[`' _zwK-.�. ----anraa. -------- -- or. ------- -orMxw�7 DAKOTA =XW ROAD R/M YAP Na 136 >t�c Doaunas nM a., � rtstterr tre:tn, 3 w..wrr...irrrr s..wrrrr..r e...rrr.>A a.LLa...a•....era r....r w rw r•.n.aw•.r Lo W C rw.r r.�r•r+>,rw n.r..a•..r o+r r+. a •...r ra.w.ar►r�rr.• ` ar•.,r..a.w,r r r ar..,rn.r r // CO w•r:r..•"r.«r.+�a,rr a�..r a.r wr \ In co CY) WON cm c0 Ln / C:) 0) t �,D •OIC N0. tro. �"-y.� �, /"Ya ��.�..M W t11ti1iI rar M Ylw co -.f, SITE SURVEY/TREE INVENTORY fill V7 3 LLJ CL 74 ru _j I Ir 3' 52 0 LL LLJ U- D Z LL_ F1 El D CD El 0 El LLJ 52 t CL r r 17 Tr__7 Li L_j 9 Ii -,----------- - - ------ UTILITY PLAN ------ - -------- (:�I:..u�:.. ... .Y� • ' � .r W I�tt^C+•��`�,aye ...• --------------- FORD RD------- ID -----------�-. L------------------;Q•_ \\ ! _-- 3 MAN lag m 14 b 1 ''„'• / / / .� 1.3 `err 11 1I awn a& t / 1 a.ar 1 asr ' 1 r'.• �� 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 f."�? � 1.1i 3t Itt —�I- —t� 1 `•— 1 S 1 b---------------------- 1 �I 1 \ au..11aN■� � rr I DIFFLEY ROADNgi`-- - .� t,�M/F/■1/rlrl._� s �f --`---------------• W=A CMXM MW 135 SUBDIVISION DESIGN ALTERNATIVE i i OAK OLU" •q+w- anew&Sat a ereel6oae ba �i per_ 10710 Alison Way saw la-r Grow Hof ht.• 101 66077 (613y 464-4M O .21 -- a !` .�� s.� ^r'•n.Sano.23 i wr.rt '• e lig . . _ ,a FINANCIAL OBLIGATION <y ' c\ �/ - LEGEND 3" i Sanftary Sewer Trunk if Water Trunk ,seta, n I r sn/.rv.li Ed.f7tj c !d l- .::•.•:• Wit.{}': T- ^' .l. /' -j numnnnmr Lateral Benefit Water :. " �� / '':. ' :::#:•''''� 0 i /' :.:.•:c;Yr= — Storm Sewer _ �g ---------- Trunk ••: w:�. • '�. �. :.�.•'' •�• i /Y �d � e 6 rte• '��•• •� �'�'•••• •r.: ;., ::�: �:�::::::{ — , ewe j 7.`' �� '� - 1•{•: .1;�:� .' . •:•: ,.*` _—moi ---- DIFFLEY ROAD w a.s.xmiro sr r r r sol/•r a�aa.� II �. .. ... ------------------ �-- DAKOTA OMWff ROAD R/M MM M& 130 Oewiepeent Data ......� .....s— ■.�....... wr.tie+''.. . ......rRra- - � - .. rum t _•__ .•.r•rw r+ . wr .. ...v... r.u r• ' u0i aver ............................ u r- wsa ru.srw�rrs.n w�-� -rw .00. — / I -._..............................._..www air sm \ La.11rrara rl rra r/r r•rr r.a.r brw N I1tl air rr..�iw.Irra rrr r...�.r•.Ir r` / r.�rw.I rr M��...rI Y W are r�.r,�• // ,� j >y aw rr ricer Ina. so- IL s 1 / ..a+.D.r.�ai a..a rrr x AN SITE PLAN r+w war.rrr r� tr ar-..rr r rw r rirr I r.rr /' O ro a tarn n C//' •ee avant.ie.. arar aw.-w r w..r a..,are a...r W....•r...r-.•re ' Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (FOREST VIEW) - TRI-LAND ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision to create 10 lots on 4.57 acres of located on the south side of Blackhawk Road just east of Hwy. 13 in the northeast 1/4 of Section 17, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. FACTS: • The eastern portion of the site received a preliminary approval for five lots in July 1997. The developer has since acquired the adjacent parcel to the west and has revised the development plans to include this additional land. • Access for all ten lots is proposed via a 400-foot long cul-de-sac, Silver Fox Court, extending from Blackhawk Road. • The development has a density of 2.2 units per acre, which is similar to existing residential development in the surrounding area. Lots range from 12,100 to 31,722 square feet in area and all lots meet the R-1 lot requirements. • Tree preservation will be determined by Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plans submitted for each lot at the time of application for building permit. The development will be subject to cash dedications for water quality, parks and trails. • The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 23, 1999, and did recommend approval, subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. ISSUES: • Two letters have been submitted by residents on Red Fox Road expressing concern about tree removal along the south portion of this development and within the area north of Red Fox Road. Staffs comments with regard to this issue is that individual lot tree preservation plans are required to be submitted and compliance with tree removal will be evaluated for each lot at the time of building permit application. This development proposes a utility connection to Red Fox Road and the lines are proposed to extend south from the boundary between Lots 7 and 8. ATTACHMENTS: February 23, 1999 APC Minutes, pages 1_9?through�. Staff Report, pages/2 through Letters from neighbors, pages through Page 20 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING CONMSSION 1 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION TRI-LAND COMPANY Acting Chair Frank opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Subdivision (Forest View) to create 10 lots on 4.57 acres located on the south side of Blackhawk Road just east of Highway 13 in the northeast 1/4 of Section. 17. Planner Dudziak introduced this item. Ms. Dudziak highlighted the information presented in City staffs planning report dated February 17, 1999. Ms. Dudziak noted the background and history, the surrounding uses and the existing conditions of the subject property. Ms. Dudziak noted the recent approval of a five-lot subdivision in July of 1997 as more fully explained in the planning report. Ms. Dudziak explained that the new proposal resulted from the acquisition of additional property. The applicant noted his presence. A resident to the south expressed his concern regarding the prior removal of vegetation and inquired as to what landscaping would be provided with the development. Another neighbor addressed the Commission with respect to boundary location problems. in response to an inquiry made by Acting Chair Frank, City Attorney Dougherty explained that the City requires the boundary pins to be located prior to the commencement of any development and that all pins for the corners of the lots must be installed within one year of final plat approval. Acting Chair Frank closed the public hearing. Member Tilley moved, Member Huusko seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Forest View) to create 10 lots on. 4.57 acres located on the south side of Blackhawk Road just east of Highway 13 in the northeast 1/4 of Section 17, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, Bl, B2, B4, C1, C2, C3, C4, D1, El and HI 2. The property shall be platted. 3. The existing house on Lot 5 must meet the R-1 setback requirements from the new lot lines. The setback dimensions shall be provided on the final site plan and compliance with the setback requirement verified prior to final subdivision approval. / � 3 Page 21 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 4. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding shall be required for the development. The cash dedication is based on the area and impervious characteristics of developed lots. 5. The final development grading plan shall be revised to reflect potential grading of the custom-graded lots. 6. The developer shall be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment Control standards. 7. The developer shall investigate the possibility of burying the overhead power lines along Blackhawk Road with the appropriate utility companies. 8. The developer shall dedicate sufficient drainage and utility easement over the proposed sanitary and storm sewer lines located on Lots 7 & 8. 9. Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plans shall be required at the time of building permit application for lots 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9. 10. Revisions to the existing pavement striping on Blackhawk Road necessary to accommodate the Silver Fox Court intersection shall be the responsibility of the developer. 11. This proposal shall be subject to a cash parks dedication and cash trails dedication. All voted in favor. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: February 17, 1999 CASE: 17-PS-05-01-99 APPLICANT: Tri-Land HEARING DATE: February 23, 1999 PROPERTY OWNER: Tri-Land PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision LOCATION: South of Blackhawk Road and east of Hwy. 13 (NW '/4 of Section 17) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I, Single Family Residential ZONING: R-1, Single Family Residential SUMMARY OF REQUEST Tri-Land Company is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Forest View) to create 10 lots on 4.57 acres located on the south side of Blackhawk Road just east of Hwy. 13 in the northeast 1/4 of Section 17. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. Planning Report - Tri-Land February 23, 1999 Page 2 E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the"Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." BACKGROUND/HISTORY The eastern portion of the site received a preliminary subdivision approval for five lots in July 1997. The developer has since acquired the adjacent parcel to the west and has revised the development plans to include this additional land. EXISTING CONDITIONS The property is unplatted and contains a single-family residence in the southwest corner of the site. There are pockets of wooded areas in the south and southeast portions of the site. A portion of the eastern part of the site has been cleared consistent with the preliminary subdivision plans previously approved. Access to the site will be provided from Blackhawk Road. Planning Report - Tri-Land February 23, 1999 Page 3 SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Blue Cross/Blue Shield; zoned PD (Planned Development); guided LB (Limited Business) South - Blackhawk Forest; zoned R-1 (Single-Family Residential); guided D-I (Single Family 0-3 units per acre) East - Single Family Residential & Sky Hill Park; zoned R-1 and Parks; guided D-111 (Mixed Residential, 6-12 units per acre) and Public West - Single Family Residential; zoned R-1; guided D-I EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area—The proposed development is similar in density to surrounding development and should be compatible with existing residential development in the surrounding area. Density—A total of 10 lots have been proposed on the 4.57 acre site resulting in a density of 2.2 units per acre. Lots— Lots within the proposed subdivision range from 12,100 to 31,722 square feet in size with an average lot measuring 15,322 square feet. All proposed lots meet applicable R-1 district lot area and width requirements. Setbacks—The R-1 zoning district requires minimum setbacks of 30 feet for a front yard, 10 feet for a side yard (5 feet for a garage), and 15 feet for the rear yard. The minimum required setback from Blackhawk Road is 40 feet. The potential building pads shown on the site plan measure 50 feet deep by 60 feet wide for each lot. All of the proposed lots appear to be of sufficient size and shape to be developed without setback variances, although Lot 3 and Lot 7 have more constrained buildable areas than the other lots. The existing house on Lot 5 must meet the R-1 setback requirements from the new lots lines. Although exact dimensions were not provided, it appears that minimum setbacks are satisfied, but the setback dimensions should be provided and compliance verified prior to final subdivision approval. Wetlands/Water Ouali1y- This development is located in Drainage Basin A in northwest Eagan. This 4.5 acre development will generate runoff that will be discharged to a stormwater pond near Robin Lane, which then discharges to a stormwater pond near Highway 13. That pond then discharges to a culvert under Highway 13 and into the wetland complex along the Minnesota River. There are no recreational classified water bodies downstream of the proposed development. Because this is a small development, staff recommends that no on-site ponds be constructed to treat runoff from the impervious areas of the development parcel. However, a cash dedication in Planning Report - Tri-Land February 23, 1999 Page 4 lieu of on-site ponding is recommended. The cash dedication is based on the area and impervious characteristics of developed lots and is expected to be from $2,625 to $2,885. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the development parcel. Grading - The preliminary grading plan is acceptable with some modifications. The site is generally wooded and slopes toward the south and west away from Blackhawk Road with very steep slopes along the south boundary. The site is approximately 25 to 30 feet above Red Fox Road within the Blackhawk Forest subdivision to the south. The developer is proposing to grade only the cul-de-sac right-of-way, with the individual lots custom-graded at time of their respective building permits. The final development grading plan should be revised to reflect potential grades of the custom-graded lots. The developer also should be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/ Sediment Control standards. Storm Drainage - The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable. Storm sewer was stubbed to the south edge of the site with the Blackhawk Forest Addition and is available for connection. This storm sewer drains to an existing storm water basin within the Blackhawk Forest Addition adjacent to Robin Lane. Utilities - The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. A sanitary sewer stub was provided with the Blackhawk Forest Addition and is available for connection along the south edge of the site. Water main is available from Blackhawk Road. The developer should investigate with the appropriate utility companies the possibility of burying the overhead power lines along Blackhawk Road. Streets/Access/Circulation - Public street access is proposed for all ten lots from a 400- foot long cul-de-sac, Silver Fox Court, extended from Blackhawk Road to the south and west. Blackhawk Road in this area is a 36-foot wide community collector roadway. Revisions to the existing pavement striping on Blackhawk Road will be necessary to accommodate the Silver Fox Court intersection and should be the responsibility of the developer. Easements/Permits/Right-of-Way - The developer should dedicate sufficient drainage and utility easement over the proposed sanitary and storm sewer lines located on Lots 7 and 8. Tree Preservation - This 4.6-acre site is located on the west side of Blackhawk Road at the intersection of Blue Cross Road in the NE I/4 of Section 17. This application is a replat of a July 7, 1997 approval that will now create nine single-family lots. A tree inventory has been submitted for this site, however, it does not include a tabular list of significant trees. The inventory indicates that the significant trees are generally located in the south half of this site. Tree species include oak trees (6"to 22" diameter), elm trees (12" to 22" diameter), ash trees (6"to 22" diameter), and several conifers (approximately 30 feet in height). Planning Report - Tri-Land February 23, 1999 Page 5 The applicant is proposing to custom grade the lots within this development. As such, an Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plan will be required for each lot at the time of application for building permit. Airport Noise Considerations - The subject property lies outside of the airport noise exposure zones established by the Metropolitan Council. Parks - A cash park and trail dedication will be required for the newly created lots. The cash dedication is payable prior to release of the final plat for recording, at the rates in effect at that time. The 1999 park dedication fee is $1,235 per unit, while the trails dedication fee is $163 per unit. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Tri-Land Company is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Forest View) to create ten lots on 4.57 acres on the south side of Blackhawk Road just east of Hwy. 13 in the; northeast 1/4 of Section 17. The proposed subdivision is appears to meet the findings required by ordinance and is generally consistent and compatible with surrounding development. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval or denial of a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of ten lots on 4.7 acres located on the south side of Blackhawk Road just east of Hwy. 13 in the northeast 1/4 of Section 17. If approved, the following conditions should apply. 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, 131, B2, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C4, D1, El, Hl 2. The property shall be platted. 3. The existing house on Lot 5 must meet the R-1 setback requirements from the new lot lines. The setback dimensions shall be provided on the final site plan and compliance with the setback requirement verified prior to final subdivision approval. 4. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding shall be required for the development.. The cash dedication is based on the area and impervious characteristics of developed lots. 5. The final development grading plan shall be revised to reflect potential grading of the custom-graded lots. 6. The developer shall be responsible for installing and maintaining erosion control measures in accordance with the City's Erosion/Sediment.Control standards. Planning Report - Tri-Land February 23, 1999 Page 6 7. The developer shall investigate the possibility of burying the overhead power lines along Blackhawk Road with the appropriate utility companies. 8. The developer shall dedicate sufficient drainage and utility easement over the proposed sanitary and storm sewer lines located on Lots 7 & 8. 9. Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plans shall be required at the time of building permit application for lots 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9. 10. Revisions to the existing pavement striping on Blackhawk Road necessary to accommodate the Silver Fox Court intersection shall be the responsibility of the developer. 11. This proposal shall be subject to a cash parks dedication and cash trails dedication. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. /Y/ 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2, 1993 LTS#5 STANDARD.CON FINANCIAL OBLIGATION—FOREST VIEW There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $1,686the parcel proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. This estimated financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Storm Sewer Trunk SF $.084/Sq Ft 85,138 Sq Ft $7,152 TOTAL $7,152 g_3 Location Map ro. Sp �r fi Sub ect Site "mmy R°.p r• c.ur rusoa uwr erorrttcrr ure ad H* i 4s, rtn�o uH[ iY ..0110 { J11 WETt a mver�+ a r � f � � ;r << ti ujr e► 4 7 44 ■ aA4 � as _ _ ii• r s 1 1000 0 1000 Feet Development/Developer. Forest View- Tri-land Company Application: Replat Case No.: 17-PS-05-01-99 / N Map Prepared using ERSI ArcView 11. Pard base map inkn i on provided City of Eagan oar C= Land Survey aro ,T is aent as d oacember19 e. W* ' E C07—ft D"Opmarl Depw&nent THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY S The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information. Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map Applicant/Project: Forest View Application: Replat Zoning Map 1 • Current Zoning: ,., PK R-1 Single Family Residential 777 Location R- R•3 R-3 goo 0 goo 1200 F..t �® Comprehensive Guide Plan r IND err Land Use Map ,4 LB La IND P D-11 Current Land Use Designation: D-1 lu Single Family Residential (0-3 units/acre) Location D-111 1 alll I 1 "a a 000 1200 F. ®m parcel base map Information pmvldad by Dakota County Land 111 v y Doparbnont 12/14t9g. N Zoning Inrorn 0—p—ldawranc ad by L .6r.up 1999 and upd.t d by City Stan. City of Eagan Z , w� F CQ1Y!/P "fyDevelopITm# 7ant THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information. S ` Aereno)oNnlnl� slaa4g•1 to t ON 034S M31A IS3tl03.,. ■' _ .i _...meg so ITU Allylogilmd ,row OLo ok as J d- .a� ♦ ' •� �� DC. yowl � 1<i r , \ ` t 01 :/% � �`\ ;ice At 1J.4- 1 I ! s`zT— ` o Zc .-1•I 7 / 5 1 -! gp U I n (1/ ! ! t,i.i _ H p I `r ,rs PI 66 LL Iv r Co` I I CCC��nnnTTT ° ! !/ `\\`i j .. jai-jy fi ♦ Y '1°�', ! I 1 f4K• ` \\``J 1 t�l�fj.t'.11jt u.� 1 oar „!! ! o. I�ot.°.b .i � ;jl`i;'•�,Ii • \\`asr\ I i sj ! .. d Ftlpi,iiilSji ! ! I i,tj,7j jl:iti i sEoe. I \`J I iT • � )I,JrJt ) 11 J jJts,)l�l�[ PRELIMINARY PLAT 6 - � I / r\ 1 1 T 1 , r. 1 , , 1 O J-- c)�CI I j C: W o I i -P70 ti i \ / OIF - c I JL m I D fO QO N 1 C \y/ 170 uWN pp o = SITE LAYOUT. Y' 1 � tl n • � I 8 VIEW Sheet No. 3 of 6 Sheets FOREST 1'RI4-A1JD COMPANY ucu a.cwu I i r\ I 1 \ 1 T r- 1 I I I \ I 1 ' r 1. •� I I 1 \ � `` \`\\ I I �I•� v\ I Cl CC C-i 0 1 / ----- 7- n / m oDoc ! I C rr) \y, x.. too .✓w, g 8 � t >• w s SITE LAYOUT: / I ��•w_•��- �!3.- T VIEW ( Sheet No. 3 of 6 Sheets FORESG< � TRI- L AND COMPANY a•w N1Y (lGY I�R(Oil M �,� AM MOD ON1'1-roiM31A 1S380J S1aa4S 9 10 7 '0N 18i4$ SMd110=0�DM1OiI �. •� e io - s � 0 .,5 O! -3 0 I � i ! I(j \ �. err •.7'.�! � 1/~ \� EXISTING CONDITIONS renoo ol+ri roi�. MIV 1SU01 ANI M02 9 1� fc °N 18445 1110►1 I11S � • I � � I z z X12_O .,oto Q O "i r N OY I io < i / ------LU 1 --� — 1 � �C ! ! i� 1 N O F- 1 `�I r ,J l uj 0 ri w LL V) I 1 C n D 1 I I O 1 1 1 1 ! 1 �Oy 11 ! 1 ! 1 ! !1 1 - L 1 I I I � 1 ' I 1 �J I J SITE PLAN .unanoD ONY111Vl — —— shay$ 9 to 4 'ON lacy$ — NY},,i 31A lCt1S3UO3 �jN �y� 1 .�1 mm cp — s LLJ �•• rl � �i—_moi i/�� °c W cr. Ilk LL .O` \ .'I _ ,�.- Bill 111 � •=> �' � i r -.i I \ J ! I I PRELIMINARY GRADING/DRAINAGE M3U Mlvwl vb�.�.. �bY^oANYdRoo pnrsayS 0 o g 'ON laayS �rw>,uun t 13�u a�rsnnl� oz 5-1 1 00 uj CV uli cz od 1 / � E • / ` ♦ ♦♦ j ♦♦ ♦ I \ i 1 � 1 ♦`. t r 1 pia h' I I I 1 11 1 _ I \ :'I \ I 1 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN • .• .w w� CLOS IYW YY�Y) i .a�Yf�� ANYMOD ONV1'I81 -. -. - _ ----' MM1S3!!�j slaa4S 9 JO ON laa4$ � Nyle M040Atl353tltl 3311 ------------------ - -- - -- aiid!!ld::..�a7�ddddddd»,�f; I y s LJ _ �S',Alw L F— N•= J� U) W O W LL O i Zi — � f F 00 s. � � I ' I I \ � t I � I 1?3 �� , TREE_ INVENTORY IVsla34S•I JO L ON 13aqS M31A ISIUOi PO ivid A91WIlilld 0, t .3r OP, 01) -10 .......... ar LU ...... 09 Lo .......... LLJ ot .. .... ... . .. .........%. fill, .,let ............................... . 69 c 0 P 4 (5 —0 s 41 U) CD z 0 W .1 _j lljj I js Craig G. Swanson and Karen K. Aklestad 1840 Red Fox Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RECEIVED 651-454-0824 MAR=BY:BY: March 3, 1999 Mayor Patricia Awada City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RE: Case # 17-PS-05-01-99 Preliminary Subdivision of Forest View-TriLand Companies Dear Mayor Awada: On Tuesday,February 23, 1999,we attended the Advisory Planning Commission and asked questions of the developer TriLand Companies. While we are in support of the project,we have one concern regarding the number of trees that may need to be destroyed in order to complete this project, especially on lots 5,6,7,8, and 9. In reviewing the attached Tree Inventory Sheet,you will note the mature trees located on these lots. It should be noted there are also mature trees located on lots 4 and 5 that are not marked on this map. Also, directly south of lots 5,6,7,and 8 is an easement that is pie shaped. The easement area has numerous mature trees. We are requesting that you require TriLand Companies and all builders who will build houses on these lots, to save as many of the mature trees on the afore-mentioned lots as possible and to take every precaution not to destroy any trees located in the easement area directly south of these lots. The developer and builders should be required to abide by Eagan's tree policy, and any replacement trees should be required to be planted on the southern boundaries of lots 5,6,7,8, and 9. During the last two years,we have planted approximately 15 trees on the boulevard and easement area across the street from our house. Some of these trees were purchased through the Eagan sponsored tree planting program and others were purchased directly from local nurseries. Last fall TriLand Companies completed some utility work on lot 5,and in the process cut down trees in the easement area. Three of these trees were trees we planted during the last two years. This is the reason for our concern of requiring TriLand Companies and all builders to strictly abide by Eagan's tree replacement policy. We are also requesting the developer be required to plant some replacement trees on the southern boundary and in the easement area of lot 5 that were cut down last fall. We thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to contact us if you should have any questions. Craig Swanson can also be reached at 651-224-3000, extension 103 during the day. (�V ig & S on k� Karen K. Aklestad cc: Pam Dudziak, Project Manager City Council Members ARVE & CAROL MOSER 1836 Red Fox Rd Eagan, MN 55122 651-454-6701 Mayor Pat Awada and Council Members Community Development Department Pam Dudziak, Project Manager City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Case# 17-PS-05-01-99 Forest View Dear Mayor Awada and City Council Members: We were not able to attend the public hearing on the development project of Triland Companies. We support the project in general, but have concerns related to the potential impact on the trees in the city easement property directly to the south of the project. This is a request for your consideration to require the developer to plant trees to replace those that will be removed by the Forest View project along the projects south border. We reside directly to the south of proposed house lot number 6 of the "Forest View" project and view the dense trees to the north of our house. As the project name implies, we do have a truly"forest view". The poject will result in the removal of many trees in the development area. The city of Eagan has been pro-active in its promotion of tree planting. We have planted 4 Ash trees on the city boulevard across the street from our home utilizing the city sponsored tree planting program. Our request is that consideration be given to having the developer work with the city forester and require the planting of some faster growing trees appropriately spaced along the south property line of the project. This request for consideration of additional tree planting is in addition to other city code requirements related to removal and replanting of trees. We thank you for your consideration. Aryer Carol Moser �J Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council E. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (NADER ADDITION) - NADER NOORYSHOKRY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision to create 3 lots on 1.56 acres on property located at the corner of Highview Avenue and Bridgeview Terrace in the southwest 1/4 of Section 4, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Joseph A. Spande Addition except the east 90 feet thereof, subject to the conditions listed in the APC minutes. FACTS: • In June 1995, a preliminary subdivision (Hayes Addition) consisting of four lots was approved for Lot 1, Block 1, Joseph A. Spande Addition, but the applicant did not follow through with the final subdivision and the preliminary approval expired. Subsequently, a single-family home was constructed on the "exception" parcel at the east end of the site. Mr. Nooryshokry has since purchased the balance of the site and is proposing to complete the subdivision that was started in 1995. • In 1998, the city completed a public improvement project for this neighborhood, which included street reconstruction and the extension of water main and sanitary sewer services to serve this site. • The site is wooded with large variations in topography. There is a ravine, wetland and spring in the southern portion of the site. The site is located in the airport Noise Zone IV, and the proposed use is considered conditional within that zone. • There is an existing single-family home located on proposed Lot 2. The other two lots are proposed to be custom-graded. Retaining walls are proposed between the lots to accommodate the necessary grade changes. • Each of the three lots exceeds 18,000 square feet in area and the minimum 85-foot lot width for the R-1 zoning district. All three lots propose to take access off Highview Avenue. • The lots are proposed to be custom-graded. Therefore, tree preservation will be determined by Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plans submitted for each lot at the time of application for building permit. The development will be subject to cash dedications for water quality, parks and trails. • The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 23, 1999, and did recommend approval, subject to the conditions in the APC minutes. ISSUES: • The public hearing revealed concern by existing residents about the removal of trees to accommodate the proposed new homes, and concern that the new homes would not be compatible with the type of existing homes in the neighborhood. ATTACHMENTS: February 23, 1999 APC Minutes, pages through Staff Report, pages.00 through, Page 22 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION NADER NOORYSHOKRY Commission Chair Heyl opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Subdivision (Nader Addition) to create 3 lots on 1.56 acres on property located at the corner of Highview Avenue and Bridgeview Terrace in the southeast 1/4 of Section 4, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Joseph A. Spande Addition except the east 90 feet thereof. Planner Dudziak introduced this item. Ms. Dudziak highlighted the information presented in City staff s planning report dated February 17, 1999. Ms. Dudziak noted the background and history, the surrounding uses and the existing conditions of the subject property. The applicant addressed the Commission stating that his desire to subdivide the property is directly related to his need to pay the assessments associated with local improvement projects. Several residents expressed the undesirability of the proposal for the type of homes that already exist in the neighborhood. Additional concern was expressed regarding tree removal and the existing storage of vehicles on the site. Responding to the comments regarding the vehicles parked on the property, the applicant stated that they are all his personal vehicles. Acting Chair Frank closed the public hearing. In response to a question from Member Miller, the applicant noted that due to the present existing house on the site, no significant change would be effected by a two lot versus three lot subdivision. Member Steininger commented that although he understands that the neighbors would prefer the property to remain as is, he believes this to be a reasonable development proposal. Member Huusko moved, Member Anderson seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Nader Addition) to create 3 lots on 1.56 acres on property located at the corner of Highview Avenue and Bridgeview Terrace in the southeast 1/4 of Section 4, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Joseph A. Spande Addition except the east 90 feet thereof, subject to the following conditions: 9� Page 23 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING CONMSSION 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: B1, E1, Fl, H1 2. The property shall be platted. 3. Architectural designs and construction methods for new construction within the development should incorporate sound attenuation standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA as compared with a noise level of 65 DNL. 4. A cash water quality dedication in lieu of on-site ponding is required. 5. The developer or builder shall work with city staff to minimize disturbance of and restore disturbed areas that are within 30 feet of the delineated wetland. 6. The driveway for Lot 3 shall be in the location shown on the Preliminary Grading Plan. 7. Existing drainage and utility easements on this site over public utilities and drainage-ways shall be maintained by this development. 8. Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plans will be required at the time of building permit application for Lots 1 and 3. All voted in favor. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: February 17, 1999 CASE: 04-PS-02-01-99 APPLICANT: Nader Nooryshokry HEARING DATE: February 23, 1999 PROPERTY OWNER: Nader Nooryshokry PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision LOCATION: 2840 Sibley Memorial Highway 13 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D-I, Single Family Residential ZONING: R-1, Residential Single Family SUMMARY OF REQUEST Nader Nooryshokry is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Nader Addition) to create 3 lots on 1.56 acres on property located at the corner of Highview Avenue and Bridgeview Terrace in the southwest 1/4 of Section 4, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Jospeh A. Spande Addition except the east 90 feet thereof. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. ao 0 Planning -Nader Noo sho Report P rY krY February 23, 1999 Page 2 F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." BACKGROUND/HISTORY In June 1995, a preliminary subdivision (Hayes Addition) consisting of four lots was approved for Lot 1, Block 1, Joseph A. Spande Addition, but the applicant did not follow through with the final subdivision and the preliminary approval expired. Subsequently, a single-family home was constructed on the "exception" parcel at the east end of the site. Mr. Nooryshokry has since purchased the balance of the site and is proposing to complete the subdivision that was started in 1995. In 1998, the city completed a public improvement project for this neighborhood, which included street reconstruction and the extension of water main and sanitary sewer services to serve this site. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is wooded and has a ravine, wetland and spring in the southern portion of the site. There is an existing single-family home located on proposed Lot 2. The other two lots are proposed to ao� Planning Report - Nader Nooryshokry February 23, 1999 Page 3 be custom-graded. Retaining walls are proposed between the lots to accommodate the necessary grade changes. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Residential; zoned R-1 (Residential Single Family); guided D-I (Single-Family Residential) South - Residential; zoned R-1; guided D-I East - Residential; zoned R-1; guided D-I West - Hwy. 13; State Park EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compatibility with Surrounding Area - The proposed development appears consistent with surrounding development, which is also single family residential. Airport Noise Considerations - The City of Eagan considered airport noise as a factor in its Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan. The Metropolitan Council has adopted an Aviation Chapter in Metropolitan Development Guide that anticipates the impacts from the continued operation of the airport at its current location. The noise policy contours in Eagan place the subject property within Noise Zone IV. Within this area, in-fill residential development is considered conditional. To approve such development in this area, the City Council would need to make acceptable findings concerning the following: 1. Specific nature of the proposed use, including the extent of outdoor activities. 2. Relationship of the proposed use to other planning considerations, including adjacent land use activities, consistency with overall comprehensive planning and relation to other metropolitan systems. 3. Frequency of exposure of proposed uses to aircraft overflight. 4. Location of proposed use relative to aircraft flight tracks and aircraft on-ground operating and maintenance areas. 5. Location, site design and construction restrictions to be imposed by the community of the proposed use with respect to reduction of exterior to interior noise transmissions and shielding of outdoor activities. 6. Method community will use to inform future occupant of proposed building of potential noise from aircraft operations. 7. Extent to which community restricts the building from having facilities for outdoor activities associated with the use. 8. Distance of proposed use from existing or proposed runways, parallel taxiways or engine run- up areas. With respect to the factual aspects of the findings, the property lies approximately two miles southeast of the nearest runway at the airport. On an annual average, approximately half of all ao ;'_ Planning Report - Nader Nooryshokry February 23, 1999 Page 4 arrivals and departures can be expected to use the runways to and from the southeast. Upon completion, approximately one-third of all arrivals and departures are expected to use the north- south runway. At current traffic levels, the airport handles approximately 500,000 operations annually. Because of the relationship of the property to the current departure and arrivalp rocedures and the runway centerlines, a significant portion of the departures and arrivals will track over or near the property. The property is approximately 3 miles from the engine maintenance and run up area. (Issues#3, 4 and 8) While the Stage III airline fleet, federally mandated by the year 2000, will create less noise per operation than the current fleet, the future net effect of such reductions is not certain. As such, regional policy requires that cities take current noise levels into account until such time as reductions in actual noise result in a reduction of the policy contours. As part of its updated Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan, the City will depict the Metropolitan Council's noise policy contours on its land use and zoning maps. This will serve as notice to future occupants of the potential noise from aircraft operations. (Issue#6) If the City determines that findings concerning these conditions support the approval of this application for in-fill development, architectural designs and construction methods for new construction within the development should incorporate sound attenuation standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA as compared with a noise level of 65 DNL. This would require an inside noise level reduction of at least 20 dBA (DNL level minus required dBA level). (Issue#5) Density - The three lots on 1.56 acres has a density of 1.9 units per acre, which is within the maximum D-I density of 3 units per acre. Lots - Each of the three lots exceeds 18,000 square feet in area and meets or exceeds the minimum required lot width of 85 feet. Setbacks - The R-1 zoning district requires minimum setbacks of 30 feet for the front yard, 10 feet for the side yard (5 feet for a garage), and 15 feet for the rear yard. The existing home on proposed Lot 2 will satisfy these setbacks. Because of easements, the buildable area of Lot 3 is more constrained than on the other lots, but should still provide sufficient space for construction of a single-family home. Landscaping - A landscape plan is not required for single-family residential development. Grading/Storm Drainage - The site has large variations in topography with elevations ranging from 790 in the northeast corner to 754 along the south boundary. The individual lots are proposed to be custom-graded at time of their respective building permits. A majority of the storm water runoff from the development drains to the existing ravine which runs along the south edge of the site. Storm sewer was constructed along the north edge of the ravine as part of the Hayes/Delosh ravine restoration project (Proj. 689) in 1996. ao3 Planning Report -Nader Nooryshokry February 23, 1999 Page 5 Wetlands/Water Quality - This development is located in Drainage Basin H and there is one jurisdictional wetland within the development parcel. This development will generate runoff that will be discharged to a large culvert under Highway 13 and into the wetland complex along the Minnesota River. There are no recreational classified water bodies downstream of the proposed development. Because this is a small development, and there is already one natural wetland located on the site, a cash water quality dedication in lieu of on-site ponding is recommended. The cash dedication is based on the area and impervious characteristics of developed lots and is expected to be from $650 to $700. The City typically requires that a 30-foot undisturbed and unmaintained buffer be provided which extends 30 feet back from the delineated boundary of wetlands. Since this application is a continuation of an earlier proposal and the buffer was not previously required, it will not be imposed at this time. However, the developer or builder should work with city staff to minimize disturbance of and restore disturbed areas that are within 30 feet of the delineated wetland. Utilities - Sanitary sewer and water services were constructed to the individual lots as part of the Valley View Plateau Street & Utility public improvement project (Prof. 663) in 1998, and are available for connection. Access/Street Design - Public street access is available from Highview Avenue along the north and west edges of the site. Highview Avenue was reconstructed to current City standards in 1998 as part of the Valley View Plateau public improvement project. All three lots are proposed to take access off Highview Avenue. The driveway for Lot 3 should be in the location shown on the Preliminary Grading Plan. Easements/Rights of Way/Permits - Existing drainage and utility easements on this site over public utilities and drainage-ways should be maintained by this development. Tree Preservation - A tree inventory was prepared for this site in 1995 and has been submitted with this application. It indicates that there are 9,800 square feet of significant woodlands and 45 significant individual trees within this site. The woodlands lay along the south edge of the property and are comprised of cottonwood, elm, boxelder, willow and ash trees. The 45 individual trees are located in the north half of the site and are comprised of spruce, pine, and cedar trees (17 to 34 feet in height), and maple, elm, oak, and cottonwood trees (9 to 27 inch diameter). One bur oak tree measures 27 inches in diameter. The applicant currently occupies the existing house which is located on proposed Lot 2. Lots 1 and 3 are proposed to be sold and custom graded for development. Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plans will be required at the time of building permit application for Lots 1 and 3. Parks and Recreation - This development is subject to a cash parks and cash trails dedication for proposed Lots 1 and 3. Lot 2 contains an existing single-family residence. 0a �4 Planning Report -Nader Nooryshokry February 23, 1999 Page 6 SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant is proposing to complete a subdivision that received preliminary approval in 1995, but expired without final approval. Residential development is consistent with surrounding uses which are also single-family residential. Public improvements in 1998 included street reconstruction and the extension of water main and sanitary sewer services to serve this site. Infill residential development is considered a conditional use within this airport noise zone, and if supported, sound attenuation should be incorporated in the architectural designs and construction methods for new construction within the development. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval or denial of a Preliminary Subdivision to create 3 lots on 1.56 acres on property located at the corner of Highview Avenue and Bridgeview Terrace in the southwest 1/4 of Section 4, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Joseph A. Spande Addition except the east 90 feet thereof. If approved, the following conditions should apply. 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Bl, El, F1, H1 2. The property shall be platted. 3. Architectural designs and construction methods for new construction within the development should incorporate sound attenuation standards sufficient to achieve an interior sound level of 45 dBA as compared with a noise level of 65 DNL. 4. A cash water quality dedication in lieu of on-site ponding is required. 5. The developer or builder should work with city staff to minimize disturbance of and restore disturbed areas that are within 30 feet of the delineated wetland. 6. The driveway for Lot 3 should be in the location shown on the Preliminary Grading Plan. 7. Existing drainage and utility easements on this site over public utilities and drainage-ways should be maintained by this development. 8. Individual Lot Tree Preservation Plans will be required at the time of building permit application for Lots 1 and 3. aas STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. a 0 6 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2, 1993 LTS#5 STANDARD.CON ^ ` FINANCIAL OBLIGATION—NADER ADDITION There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $-0- on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are pending assessments in the amount of $48,480 on the parcel that is proposed for platting. The improvements are related to Project 663 Valley View Plateau. This estimated financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Trunk Storm Sewer (1) S.F. $.084/Sq Ft 68,678 Sq Ft $5,769 TOTAL $5,769 (1) Areas of ponding and storm sewer easements are not presently known. Adjustment will be made when areas are known. ao � Location Map :! LrW Ff 2 a = u Sub Oct Site Q; low t • r so ! a •v r a wwlmaw.vc— e o� t 3 , , f .0e � � s# L I t . a ..'D•.vien.vC. ® 1L A at• u•�er wut Dw. as 10 1 40 x : o , f a ! 4110' at O, y ® Y �010 s 40 • 1 a� Saw t : am= x ' t c d 8g 3 e rcurrM+.D. j I i F C � �e1®CCDM IIOM U B 4 ® ® �4 ®-ws`ill No am ♦• >t 1000 0 1000 Feet Development/Developer. Nader Addition Application: Preliminary Subdivisio ^D Case No.: 04-PS-02-01-99 Q�) e,ep Prepaed using ERSI ArcVww 11. Parcel base rrW it f w edon provided City of Eaganbr DenCountya y Land Survey Depots nt and is«mr# 6. W+ �as of Decwberl99E C—9101Y /r THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY S The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information. ■■■■�■�■�� III■11l11� NINE ■ �` ��■�■■■ " 'lll loss NINE�1 ■ ■ . �• ■■•��••• ��Ili 1'11111 : �r■■■art�1//� ,— � ■� 11■■I/�i ■■ ■■r�7■■ ■ .. . bin MINION ; :111 !1■1111 410�city of Eagan 7—Ing Infenrnation pMvldod by La—ence Group 1990 and updated by City 11taff. E LINK 2-- THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY + Dq)wtnent The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information. s rd- FF^� FS •r Z' i e _ EF LL •_ F Z �' o -j a : w jj tt - !E - -t= 1 r F t ill �( NO — S ! C i a r nr[=rlr IOiA Arrnw I QriiP11 YIA[rrlY• .+, w ctft �v min irrnw prlcPlr MIA y[1T•n SrR ? M 06i.'Ir IA Slw +— 7 •r• •t te] •na+w+•..•o r'■ •r ae] •it+>+nw :+rr•o t'. •[svl •�•+•nv ' . > LLI �b tL I avatrlr qlw 1['rl•A 'fMfill�tl 1IW ear.,p 0 .1 SIA Amrw )„ .7 .. - r'■ 'I avl 'PIW ,+•.ro S'1 •1 7/1 •r.•177K�+ .J : i J - to �rl " - - - - - - - - - - - — y� ry rr S•:.wwrow w-cac 30d6831 "°" M3 A390189 _ 1 M,L6,ZZ.0 N OO'SLIz Z on 40 i OJI ion 0_ I} n �i—M"t-b�•ON 6�S I _2i m I i 31►t �.�� T: d I I NO t I � – b•� .a �� 1` lO i. 4 �V o -,_ \63•'j 3.9S2y 61 LO w �_ w� a0► I W.e / 3 E .i N `� lad ♦.rI��N O N O .' ��•0 a�� Fol O N ^° = PRELIMINARY PLAT c�m u 3� e c ea re � s s � tL � OOOIIII _ W �? e � �tt (Q :[:s ; it V is �� Zvi It zi i LI _ E c t fiI OO SLI 01 01, W n : l®r % r PRELIMINARY GRADING/DRAINAGE ca AA cr Coe cc I i r %n �. a o- o ,� ,�VENIJ(. h� H1G11V'�_W o 301.99 PER POST AOOITION NO. 3S AVE. CV W U' 301.35MEAS. N 89'059 56"E 271 e /5,7��° I i. it, F- �4 h 3B 01 n, X00 ci, � } K o 3 ;: W P /5,9 92 N /(O• , • 30 • i. I nl r w iu U &0 Q 3 r 1' \ �ir. N 41 4 Q. W ti o v). yy11 3� 1"W I 4 9a \, / ,,1„MNAGl�A V;IL,ITY � o yn.o�4 W N 3a537.50 31,35 3' 10,� `v 4' .0 1 .5 e9 o � 1 :00 05 0 .2-9 E \ � ,) '( �/' - 120.00 - i oLL Solan 116.79 , L`' 206.25 _ 3 �. n — _—_— — — —_—1 X30 W �q� X323,04 sOflP37 13�W W V-M `( \ k'o9s0 \ 3 `I EXCEPT161 1 %, , DAAIMAI[ AMO UTIUTT v _ 6` // [AI[YIMT ` \� 10 In In L! O R 184.25 7 00 / - 214. 25 N/89045 52 W '/' \ Scal.e: 1 inch = 100 feet. SKF,'1'C11 1'011 lluol'OSEi) DIVISION OP IAT 1, BLOCK 1, JOSEPH A. SPANDE 1S'P ADDITION. o z m j N m D r c D 1 O Z m A Q a s A>a s W ' ' • • •W W •N N N N N N N N N N D Z 7G O m = A $ - Z m K o N Ay ii eC)C) C)NC)Q N(/1 V1Nf/1NN4f C)n NNNN V1 C,InN NNNR'RIR UINN'Rm N M ,°, 0 55 , e y P,F,R� 9 R °a � 4, �°a R?R R g S� � 4, n !° m0 ED j!' >K 8 R B'r� n m 3 3 3 2 e C 0 3 m -Z,) Q A N V OI V V�W W NI N W N O V>O O a 0 O�N U,+W D•W=t/i m>O 1p,O Ut N W e1 N L V V W = N C 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ^ . . 'r r- r r r,.^. r 7 r r r r - m Y u y 3 o n c a �r a /3 TREE- INVENTORY (1995) y I Y = a o jjD m Z € - ui a j i I o c ft Y, Std w{{!L�u O(R. wYfY Mu 1 4 � R{ir{i to YTL.. /6{rli iu YTI{. {iltY�L[f(R. •('{'[VI'�L1>A,wap � t'['{vl•[i>aRw,amp {'.•[Ml'r+..�.,.wq.. 2•� � W i (D w�arti max.tarn. w�tr.{i d YRf[. 'w AM,/�,0 • '.•l sal'wi.ati,+w,0 O {'{'t MI •w.f iTti,a,0 [•PI M3 A30G18G ■ M,11,ZLAN OQS1i 0iO S '• .r oT1d�5XtQ cc if r' zo OV '•''• r� P a I. }}'' '' •. e P a I 00fi::• . a? :::: •. .:'•:: I Q £�ONS ° sir'' . : ':•:':: :;:;:;::;;;:;:;: �y {� `� / 1 a o5l R",00 rc Cp =moo V � Agenda Information Memo March 16, 1999 Eagan City Council Meeting F. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT REZONING & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (SOUTHERN LAKES WEST) SPRINGBROOK CORPORATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ➢ To approve or deny a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the existing Land Use Guide Plan designation of a 10 acre parcel of land located east of T.H. 3 between Diffley Road and Cliff Lake Road from PF, Public Facilities to R-1, Single Family Residential in the southeast '/4 of Section 25. ➢ To approve or deny a Rezoning of approximately 10 acres from P, Public Facilities to R-1, Residential Single Family in the southeast '/4 of Section 25. ➢ To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision entitled the "Southern Lakes West" located in the southeast '/4 of Section 25 subject to the conditions listed in the APC meeting minutes. FACTS: ➢ The subject property is currently unplatted and is presently owned by the St. Thomas Becket Catholic Community. The property was anticipated to be included in the long-term expansion plans of the church. ➢ All lots within the subdivision are proposed to be served by water and sewer that was extended by the City of Eagan to Inver Grove Heights under a joint powers agreement to serve the adjacent Southern Lakes subdivision. ➢ At their regular meeting on February 23, 1998, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision and recommended approval subject to the conditions listed in the APC meeting minutes. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: Minutes of the February 23, 1999 APC meeting, pages26through c2L.P. Staff report, pagesoYthrough.2341. a Page 2.1 ' February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION SPRINGBROOK CORPORATION Commission Chair Heyl opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use of approximately 10 acres from PF (Public Facilities) to D-1 (Single Family), a Rezoning from P (Public Facilities) to R-1 (Single Family), a Preliminary Subdivision (Southern Lakes West) to create 15 lots and a Variance to the cul-de-sac length, located east of Highway 3, abutting the west boundary of Inver Grove Heights and north of Cliff Road in the SE'/4 of Section 25. Planner Kirmis introduced this item. Mr. Kinnis highlighted the information presented in City staffs planning report dated February 17, 1999. Mr. Kirmis noted the background and history, the surrounding uses and the existing conditions of the subject property. Mr. Kiumis explained that access to the development would be through Inver Grove Heights. The applicant noted his presence. No member from the audience addressed the Commission. Acting Chair Frank closed the public hearing. Member Steininger moved, Member Anderson seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use of approximately 10 acres from PF (Public Facilities) to D-1 (Single Family. All voted in favor. Member Steininger moved, Member Anderson seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Rezoning from P (Public Facilities) to R-1 (Single Family). All voted in favor. Member Steininger moved, Member Tilley seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Southern Lakes West) which includes a Variance, to create 15 lots, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Page 25 February 23, 1999 ADVISORY PLANNING CONMSSION Bl, B2, B4, Cl, C2, C3, DI and El 2. The property shall be platted. 3. An on-site pond shall be constructed in the southeast corner of the site to provide on-site treatment for runoff from this parcel. The pond excavation should incorporate a 10-foot wide aquatic bench extending from NWL to 1 foot below NWL and side slopes below the aquatic bench should be 3:1 to a maximum depth of 4 feet. The pond should have a minimum wet volume of 0.3 acre-feet. 4. An undisturbed and unmaintained buffer extending at least 30 feet back from the delineated boundary of LP-30 shall be preserved. 5. This proposal shall be subject to a cash parks dedication and cash trails dedication. 6. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 7. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. All voted in favor. a� � PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: February 17, 1999 CASE: 25-CG-01-01-99 25-RZ-01-01-99 25-PS-01-01-99 APPLICANT: Springbrook Corporation HEARING DATE: February 23, 1999 PROPERTY OWNERS: St. Thomas Becket PREPARED BY: Bob Kirmis Catholic Community REQUEST: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary Subdivision LOCATION: (SE 1/4 of section 25) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: PF, Public Facility ZONING: P, Public Facilities SUMMARY OF REQUEST Springbrook Corporation is requesting Preliminary Subdivision approval to allow the creation of a 15 lot single family residential subdivision entitled "Southern Lakes West". The proposed subdivision overlays 10 acres of land located east of T.H. 3 between Diffley Road and Cliff Lake Road in the southeast 1/4 of Section 25. In conjunction with the requested preliminary subdivision, the applicant has also requested a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to change the guided designation of the property from PF, Public Facilities to R-1, Single Family Residential and a Rezoning of the property from an P, Public Facilities to an R-1, Residential Single Family zoning designation. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment: The City's Comprehensive Guide Plan was prepared pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.864. As defined by statute, the Land Use Plan is a guide and may be amended from time to time as conditions change. The City's Guide Plan is to be implemented by official controls such as zoning and other fiscal devices. The creation of land use districts and zoning is a formulation of public policy and a legislative act. As such, the classification of land uses must reasonably a4? Planning Report—Springbrook Corporation February 23, 1999 Page 2 relate to promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare. When a change to a City's Comprehensive Guide Plan is requested, it is the city's responsibility to determine if the change is in the best long-range interests of the City. The standard of review of a City's action in approving or denying a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment is whether there exists a rational basis. A rational basis standard has been described to mean having legally sufficient reasons supportable by the facts which promote the general health, safety and welfare of the City. Rezoning: 1. City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 5 states, in part that the City Council shall not rezone any land or area in any zoning district or make any other proposed amendment to this chapter without first having referred it to the planning commission for it's consideration and recommendation. Subdivision: City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. Planning Report—Springbrook Corporation February 23, 1999 Page 3 H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization"which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." BACKGROUND/HISTORY The site in question is presently owned by the St. Thomas Becket Catholic Community and was anticipated to be included in the long-term expansion plans of the church. To accommodate single family residential uses upon the site and establish a basis for rezoning of the property, it is necessary to change its guided use to a D-I, Single Family (0-3 units/acre) designation. The site is presently zoned A, Agriculture and therefore, a rezoning of the property to an R-1, Residential Single Family designation is also necessary. EXISTING CONDITIONS The 10 acre property is currently undeveloped. The site is mostly open grassland and gently rolling, with a topographic difference of approximately 20 feet from the northeast corner to the south side of the property before dropping down a wooded hillside toward a pond (LP-30). Approximately 2.5 acres of the property is comprised of a wetland (Pond LP-30). Some significant trees exist in the southern portion of the site (alongside the pond). The site also lies within the shoreland overlay district of Hay Lake (a general development lake). aau Planning Report—Springbrook Corporation February 23, 1999 Page 4 The site is accessed from the east through the Southern Lakes development, which lies within the City of Inver Grove Heights. All lots within the subdivision are proposed to served by water and sanitary sewer that was extended by the City of Eagan to Inver Grove Heights under a joint powers agreement to serve the adjacent Southern Lakes subdivision. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - NSP Sub-Station; zoned P, Public Facilities; guided PF, Public Facilities South - Undeveloped; zoned R-1, Single Family Residential; guided PF, Public Facilities East - Single Family Residential (within the City of Inver Grove Heights) West - St. Thomas Becket Church; zoned P, Public Facilities; guided PF, Public Facilities EVALUATION OF REQUEST Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment To justify the requested rezoning of the property (to an R-1 designation), it is necessary to change its guided land use from PF, Public Facilities to D-1, Single Family Residential (0-3 units/acre). The proposed land use appears compatible with surrounding uses. Rezoning The requested rezoning from A, Agriculture to R-1, Residential Single Family is necessary to allow further subdivision of the property. The proposed rezoning of the property must be contingent upon the City's approval of the requested Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. Preliminary Subdivision Compatibility with Surrounding Area - The subject site is bounded on the north south and west p w g J , by property guided for"public facilities" and on the east by single family residential uses. The proposed addition of single family residential uses to the area appears compatible with existing and anticipated surrounding land uses. ensit - A total of 15 dwelling units have been proposed upon the subject 10 acre property. This results in a density of 1.5 units per acre, consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Lots - Within R-1 zoning districts, a minimum lot area requirement of 12,000 square feet is required. Lots within the proposed subdivision range from 12,006 to 98,581 square feet with an average size lot measuring 25,805 square feet in size. Thus, the minimum area requirements of a�� Planning Report—Springbrook Corporation February 23, 1999 Page 5 the City Code have been satisfactorily met. Likewise, all lots have been found to meet or exceed the minimum R-1 district lot width requirement of 85 feet. Setback - As a condition of building permit issuance, future homes upon the property will be required to comply with applicable R-1 district building setback requirements. All proposed lots demonstrate an ability to comply with R-1 district setback requirements. Gradin - The preliminary grading plan is acceptable. The site is generally open and drains to the south. Storm Drainage - The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable. Storm water runoff from the site will drain via storm sewer to a storm water basin on Lots 11 and 12 before discharging into Pond LP-30, as identified in the City Storm Water Management Plan (1990) along the south edge of the site. tilities - The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. Sanitary sewer and water main were stubbed to the east edge of the site as part of the Southern Lakes development within Inver Grove Heights and are available for connection. Streets/ Access/ Circulation - The public street, Alicia Circle, stubbed to the northeast corner of the site (also as part of the Southern Lakes development within Inver Grove Heights) is proposed to be extended as a cul-de-sac to provide street access for all of the lots in the development. Water Quality/Wetlands - The subject site is located within the watershed of Pond LP-30, a Class II indirect contact recreation water body. It is recommended on-site ponding be provided to treat this runoff prior to discharge to Pond LP-30. The low area in the southeast corner of the site should be used to construct a stormwater pond to treat runoff from this development. The excavation should be conducted to include a 10 foot wide safety bench just below the normal water elevation and that the side slope below the bench not exceed 3:1. The pond should have a minimum wet volume of.3 acre-feet. There is one jurisdictional wetland within the development parcel located along the shoreline of LP-30, which is proposed to be protected by a 50 foot unmaintained buffer strip. This exceeds the City's standard 30 foot buffer strip requirement Tree Preservation - A submitted tree inventory indicates that there are 48 significant trees existing on site. All of these trees are located on the extreme west and south (which is the north shoreline of Pond LP 30)boundaries of the property. The development of this site will not disturb any of these trees. The applicant has indicated that the preservation of the existing trees is a "high priority" as the site is impacted by South Robert Trail and the Soo Line Railroad. CQ Planning Report—Springbrook Corporation February 23, 1999 Page 6 The applicant has also indicated that the retention of trees along the pond is intended to provide a visual buffer to the future church site and highway activity across the pond. Parks - Cash park and trail dedication will be required for the newly created lots. For 1999, a cash park dedication fee of$1,235 per unit is required while a dedication of$163 per unit is required for trailway dedication. Airport Noise Considerations - The subject property lies outside of the airport noise exposure zones established by the Metropolitan Council. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The proposed 15 lot single family residential subdivision is considered compatible with existing and anticipated uses in the area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED A. To recommend approval or denial of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the existing Land Use Guide Plan designation of an unplatted, 10 acre parcel of land located between Diffley Road and Cliff Lake Road (along the City's eastern boundary) in the SE 1/4 of Section 25 from PF, Public Facility to R-1, Single Family Residential. B. To recommend approval or denial of a Rezoning of approximately 10 acres from P, Public Facilities to R-1, Single Family Residential located between Diffley Road and Cliff Lake Road (along the City's eastern boundary)in the SE 1/4 of Section 25. C. To recommend approval or denial of a Preliminary Subdivision entitled the "Southern Lakes West" located between Diffley Road and Cliff Lake Road (along the City's eastern boundary). in the SE 1/4 of Section 25. If approved, the following conditions should apply: 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: B1, 2, 4 Cl, 2, 3 D1 El 2. The property shall be platted. a�� Planning Report—Springbrook Corporation February 23, 1999 Page 7 3. An on-site pond shall be constructed in the southeast corner of the site to provide on-site treatment for runoff from this parcel. The pond excavation should incorporate a 10-foot wide aquatic bench extending from NWL to 1 foot below NWL and side slopes below the aquatic bench should be 3:1 to a maximum depth of 4 feet. The pond should have a minimum wet volume of 0.3 acre-feet. 4. An undisturbed and unmaintained buffer extending at least 30 feet back from the delineated boundary of LP-30 shall be preserved. 5. This proposal shall be subject to a cash parks dedication and cash trails dedication. 6. Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) shall be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved. 7. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. any STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Wav 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. ass 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2, 1993 LTS#5 STANDARD.CON ^� FINANCIAL OBLIGATION SOUTHERN LAKES WEST There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $-48,682- on the parcel proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. This estimated financial obligation is subject to change based upon the areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Sanitary Sewer Trunk S.F. $880/Lot 15 Lots $ 13,200 TOTAL $13,200 a� =... _. eee'© © meq� ,•, • 0 A10 Bee eeeeeNil � ,�00000000 ■ ae o`er � �� •� v o �,eeeee ■ vv o�q © �`�• ` SII . . • . . Application: Comprehensive Guide Plan Amend/Rezoning/Prelim. Sub. Case No.: *Cby DAM C4Lr9y Lx%d%mvey Depwtrwt and is oxrwt n d D@awrbw199& ity . Eagan THIS MAP IS WrENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY r ._.- Zoning • Comprehensive Guide Plan Lan • Use MapApplicant/Project: Southern Lakes West SubdivisionApplication: Comp.Guide Amend/Rezoning/ mmu vr. .► �i Current Zoning: Current Land Use Designation: 1 � PF Public Facilities M PIP 1 � PF Public Facilities �� •�� tri ,i: _.W lip ._ City of Eagan City of Inver Grove Heights --------------------- Proposed subdivision L ✓' T '�--- ��. :� � b�A jl \� /�'\�///�' ?—i 1.//i�, ,\ �'� I—--------- AF 0 500 Feet a3v SITE VICINITY 7..Ifl IV nl�f\IT II".AI I r1 L'L'I I IVI r ' 200 tY y33A flea I IC) � + I 1 I � a 1 ' 1 r Ir - ___--_ __-__�'-___-___ _r Ti tg 11 r l a I I�_ 'I 5• }u • 11 I r � � � � I I• 'i r �'TJ `` g I II f I -----'----1-J A it ,li 3U II - ---- J; --h Zj I's - o y IC; I � a I I I�} m I I 1 Y ------- ---w- -' N ----.L _._ ` 376 I --------- -- v I ON PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISI 1 JillI. - -� fit { I r i� 1 III 11ih11i1i ; - +- - -, rq 1 • , � l �11N I y I ♦ CSI /% � - / z ' � lit- Ni1117 ll �L -, f• I I(( III- ter.::;A .� TI 11!111/ : 11111 I+ LL'f � \110 U\ It --_- Imp i Wi 11 3 $ GRADING/TREE PRESERVATION PLAN ( I I L_____ ________________ ------ ---------- its I U - I' m II I I I I ----------- � • ! PYA- P ., Ap • � -�"E Ilea �$�.. � ..��.^ Vim' J _ -� ----------- -- -- s $z - p ------------ • 1 3f _ I y� � I / x / IN ti 0-33UTILITY PLAN NOISIAI WIS AIIVNll ll3Md ---------- ut '� 1R-------- � t,lp r ii I I iJ n• I '_ C z ----- ---------- 6 -------- - /'•� Q I 'I' C1 I ' I a el I --- �1 I t nl i F .---r—T --- i OW * ;Fs CJI i 5 CJI - - ——— — 1 V V I Fee: S50.00 Lity of Eagan Year. 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,MN 55122 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE COMMERCIAL FERTH IZER APPLICATOR For person or firm that has s commercial applicator license issued by the State Agriculture Commissioner. (Q I VL �� ,F Po I Z3 � ��9 - zap �� Phone Business Name or Company Street Address N,� �,/�.f� State Zip �l'� _ �G��'�`"' r city ��'V`� Phone Business Contact Street Address City State tip REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION: hos A description of Lawn fertilizer formulations(nitrogen,phosphorus, `�potassium)proposed for use on lawns in Eagan by the applicant. A copy of the commercial applicator license Issused by the State Agriculture Commissioner. CONDITIONS OF LICENSE: 1 The city shall conduct random sampling of any commercial lawn fertilizer to be applied in the city at any time after the licence is issued. The cost of sample analysis shall be paid by the commercial applicator if the phosphorus content is found to exceed authorized levels. 2. A copy of the license shall be in the possession of the licensee or its employees or agents when making fertilizer applications within the city. 3 No fertilizer applications may be made when the ground is frozen or between November 15 and April 1 4. Licensee or its employees or agents Should not apply,spill or otherwise deposit fertilizer on impervious surfaces. All fertilizer shall be completely removed from the impervious surface before the licensee/employee/agent leaves the site. pond or lake. 5. Fertilizer applications shall not be made within 15 feet of the edge of a wetland, 6 Fertilizer content and application rate: * tain more than 3%by weight of phosphate expressed as Fertilizer applications in the city cannot con P205. uare feet of lawn * Annual amounts shall not exceed.5 lb. of phosphate expressed as P205 per 1000 sq area unless documented by a lawn soil phosphorus test conducted by the University of Minnesota Soil Testing Lab and taken within the last two years. expressed at P205 per 1000 square * The license must maintain a record of the pounds of phosphateexp feet of land applied to each site during the year. I certify that I have read and understand the above conditions and as a licensee,I agree to comply with those conditions.. 1��Q, 9, 3- ,1 -q I — Date Signature of Applicant Failure to comply with licensing requirements prior to applying fertilizer Is a misdemeanor. Noncompliance with licensing requirements is cause for termination of the license following a public hearing. i I OFFICE USE: RECEIPT# _ AMOUNT" DATE PAID