Loading...
2620 Eagan Woods Dr s Use BLUE or BLACK Ink f ----- ------ del For Office Use I �� Permit#: � �����City of EaEd� I 3830 Pilot Knob Road . I Permit Fee:� �(G�, Eagan MN 55122 I Date Received: Phone: (651)675-5675 FE8 ��16 y Fax: (651) 675-5694 Staff: Ai- 2016 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 2/16/2016 Site Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive Tenant Name: Summit Orthopedics (Tenant is: ✓ New/ Existing) Suite#: Former Tenant: Name: MSP Commercial Phone: 651-287-8891 Property Owner Address/city/zip: 1215 Town Centre Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Applicant is: Owner ✓ Contractor Description of work: New Medical Office Building Type of Work Construction Cost: $8500,000.00 Name: RJM Construction License#: Contractor Address: 701 Washington Avenue North city. Minneapolis State:-MN Zip: 55401 Phone: 952-837-8600 Contact: Eric Kobeska Email: eric.kobeska @rjmconstruction.com Name: Welsh Architectural Registration#: ArchitectlEnglneer, Address: 4350 Baker Road, Suite #400 city: Minnetonka State:-MN Zip: 55343 Phone: 952-897-7700 Contact Person: Lynn Sloat Email: Isloat @welshco.com �qj(- �eWuf 1k. 0 ��1°-3 Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: Phone#: ` 2-1 NOTE.Plans and supporting documents that you submit we consklered to be public information. Portions of the Information maybe classified as non-public if you provicla► iiic reasons mat would permit the city,to conclude that the V an ft do secrets. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at(651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit;that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires review and approval of plans. X Eric Kobeska Applicant's Printed Name Applican s Signa ure Page 1 of 3 (11L DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE SUB TYPES /Foundation _ Public Facility _ Exterior Alteration-Apartments ✓ Commercial/Industrial _ Accessory Building _ Exterior Alteration-Commercial Apartments Greenhouse/Tent Exterior Alteration-Public Facility Miscellaneous Antennae WORK TYPES New _ Interior Improvement Siding _ Demolish Building* Addition _ Exterior Improvement Reroof _ Demolish Interior Alteration _ Repair Windows _ Demolish Foundation Replace _ Water Damage Fire Repair _ Retaining Wall Salon Owner Change *Demolition of entire building-give PCA handout to applicant DESCRIPTION od Valuation d, $-00,CCU Occupancy MCES System -e. Plan Review I,j z S Code Edition SAC Units (25%_100% ✓ ) Zoning City Water Census Code Stories Booster Pump #of Units Square Feetq,'�doD �/�,/ PRV ✓ #of Buildings Length �— Fire Sprinklers Type of Construction Width REQUIRED INSPECTIONS y1 Footings(New Building) Sheetrock Footings(Deck) V I'Inal/C.O.Required ootings(Addition) Final/No C.O. Required Foundation Other: Drain Tile , Pool:_Footings _Air/Gas Tests _Final .oof: v,.Decking ✓ Insulation _Ice&Water "Final ./ Siding:_Stucco Lath _Stone Lath ✓Brick Framing Windows fireplace:_Rough In _Air Test _Final Retaining Wall ✓ Insulation Erosion Control Meter Size: Concrete Entrance Apron Final C/O Inspection/: Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: ✓Yes No Reviewed By: A4111 , Building Inspector Reviewed By: , Planning COMMERCIAL FEES Base Fee 3�, 9��i,�.� Storm Sewer Trunk Surcharge Sewer Trunk Plan Review '7` Water Trunk MCES SAC 74,550,00 Street Lateral City SAC 313 00 .00 Street S&W Permit&Surcharge Water Lateral Treatment Plant'] Other:g$farnlc�aa na�i .s� 3 ao©�� Treatment Plant(Irrigation) I c-p' Park Dedication �'� ,O(� �Rridse ! �uarJn Trail Dedication Water Quality TOTAJ:, ff Page 2 of 3 70 Dale Schoeppner March 9, 2016 Chief Building Official City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 Dear Mr. Schoeppner: The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Division has determined the SAC to be charged for the wastewater capacity demand for Summit Orthopedics to be located at 2620 Eagan Woods Drive within the City. The City will be charged SAC as determined below. SAC Units Charges: Office 66,784 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft. /SAC 27.83 Warehouse 817 sq. ft. @ 7000 sq. ft. /SAC 0.12 Parking Garage 40 fixture units @ 17 fixture units /SAC 2�'i Net Charge: 30.30 or-LO§M Due The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is the City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions email me at core.mccullough(o)metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Cory McCullough SAC Program Technical Specialist CM:jn: 160309A7 (703779, 391624) Determination Expiration: 3/09/2018 cc: Peggy Fleck&Amy Griffin, City of Eagan Eric Kobeska, RJM Construction File, MCES Phone 390 Robert Street North I St, Paul, MN 55101-1805 , METROPOLITAN C 0 U N C f L Peggy Fleck 76 From: John Gorder Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 10:57 AM To: Pam Dudziak; Gregg Thompson Cc: Aaron Nelson; Peggy Fleck Subject: Summit Ortho Building Permit - Underground Infiltration - Financial Guarantee All -As part of the building permit, Peggy has received and coded a $35,000 financial guarantee for the underground infiltration feature Summit is installing on site. Peggy coded it as a second landscape FG, but it is intended to serve as an FG for the storm water facility. Peggy—thanks for checking on this. John John Gorder I City Engineer J City of Eagan City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan,MN 55122 1651-675-5645 1651-675-5694(Fax) (gorderCa?cityofeagan.com ty THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error,please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. 1 City of Eapil 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 fGvs (cif c/ AR, 122016 Use BLUE or BLACK In p For Office Use" e44 3!/ 7.7 Permit #: Permit Fee: Date Received: Staff: ry 2016 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION 4u Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: 04/12/2016 Site Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive Tenant: Summit Orthopedics Suite #: Property Owner Contractor Type of Work Permit Type Name: Summit Orthopedics Name: Gilbert Mechanical Contractors Address: 4451 W 76th Street Phone: 952.893.2149 City: Edina Phone: License #: PC005309 Email: bids@gilbertmech.com State: MN Zip: 55435 New _4 Replacement _ Repair _ Rebuild _ Modify Space _ Work in R.O.W. Description of work: Core drilling, excavation, new vent piping , new domestic water piping, new storm piping, provide and install plumbing fixtures, plumbing pipe insulation. COMMERCIAL New Construction X Modify Space _ Irrigation System ( yes / V no) ( RPZ / _ PVF3) • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems • Avg. GPM (2" turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Meters Call (651) 675-5646 to verity that tests passed prior to picking up meter. Domestic: Size & Type Avg. GPM High demand devices? Yes /No j COMMERCIAL FEES $60.00 Permit Fee Minimum $60.00 PVB/RPZ Permit (includes State Surcharge) ISurcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge tFollowing fees apply when installing a new lawn irrigation system Contact the City's Engineering Department, (651) 675-5646, for required fee amounts. ) Fire: 1 Flushometers Yes 'No Contract Value $ 122,511.00 x .01 $ 1,225.11 Permit Fee = $ ,2 Surcharge $ .g7 JTAL FEE r r;.+---7-17 rok.4 $ (‘) TreatmarrVrant V/44141 6 74 Water Supply & Storage I. $ State Surcharge =$ 6q 3 7 )TALFEE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection ;against underground utility damage. \ I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and appal of plans. x Brooke Sanders Applicant's Printed Name FOR OFFICE USE Approved By: Required Inspections:Under Ground Rough In �ir Test Gas Test Meter Related Items: Meter Size _' Radio Re ' . .... :I Radio 3 Date: Bim/ I Final PRV Required: , Yes Staff: Page 1 of 3 City of Eaall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 APR 292016 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Permit #: 1 a37 Permit Fee: •3 4 t 3. 6'i Date Received: Staff: 2016 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 4 , /2 itP Site Address: 20 e9cunwniDOd iDri ye - IA 1 (Tenant is: g New / Existing) Suite #: Former Tenant: Tenant Name: SUMMit Or- opeclICs Name: M s P Lo rn m rc 1 Phone: Address / City / Zip: 12-15 Twin C W{VJ rL D Si -e- I SOS Earjan Applicant is: Owner 7t, Contractor Description of work: 1Q ArliVlIf Oj V'. tS 1LFOfl1.°°J Construction Cost: Name: License #: Address: b QD QualaxAve J1 e 1tY'L City: i Drdcin State: N N Zip: G 13C./2_, Phone: � 4612' zzg# Contact: darniE, 1--1f'ii2jS Email: J(kmie, ovn Name: eiN, I otai Pai .SS 1()d S Registration #: 440 Address: � O9 Ly td de, PA2 D City: 0 613 6 State: ` Zip: J Lt1i. Phone: 9 S2. - 30,-; 5 12 Contact Person:P CA/(i6 Jotinson Email: j O W Car Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: Phone #: ou submit areconsr ere he if you prova►e sped c oncl e"that they are tradesecre{s CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.org I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Jaintle- YOU S Ap • nt's Printed Name ttr Appli nw�aature Page 1 of 3 , LoO'ct5'- DO NOT WRIT BELOW THIS LINE 13'21 SUB TYPES Foundation /Commercial / Industrial Apartments Miscellaneous WORK TYPES New Addition Alteration Replace Salon Owner Change DESCRIPTION Valuation Plan Review (25%_ 100% Census Code # of Units # of Buildings Type of Construction Public Facility Accessory Building Greenhouse / Tent Antennae Interior Improvement Exterior Improvement Repair Water Damage 2x5,660. a� v• /3 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings (New Building) Footings (Deck) / Footings (Addition) Occupancy Code Edition Zoning Stories Square Feet Length Width Foundation Drain Tile Roof: _Decking Insulation _Ice & Water _Final Framing Fireplace: _Rough In Air Test Final Insulation Meter Size: Exterior Alteration -Apartments Exterior Alteration -Commercial Exterior Alteration -Public Facility Siding Reroof Windows Fire Repair Demolish Building* Demolish Interior Demolish Foundation V Retaining Wall *Demolition of entire building - give PCA handout to applicant MCES System SAC Units City Water Booster Pump PRV Fire Sprinklers Sheetrock Final / C.O. Required ✓ Final / No C.O. Required ✓ Other: 13Aei/L'-- Pool: _Footings _Air/Gas Tests Final Siding: Stucco Lath Stone Lath Brick Windows ✓ Retaining Wall Erosion Control Concrete Entrance Apron Final CIO Inspection: Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: Yes v/ No Reviewed By: C 'I& , Building Inspector Reviewed By: DA"!it- W . , Planning COMMERCIAL FEES Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MCES SAC City SAC S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Treatment Plant (Irrigation) Park Dedication Trail Dedication Water Quality 2loG.9s' /37 . S'b 13cq.3q Storm Sewer Trunk Sewer Trunk Water Trunk Street Lateral Street Water Lateral Other: TOTAL: '3&/3 • 64 Page 2 of 3 ❑❑❑❑❑ Ern ❑❑ Add/Change LOT SURVEY CHECKLIST FOR RETAINING WALL /3 �> BUILDINGiPERMIT APPLICATION Address: Zb�'-� LY\ l.(MLL Applicant Name: NI C-sZ1fY1 Yri'e�u10,.1 t'S (•o z3-7 DATE OF SURVEY: .V -1///b LATEST REVISION: **Permits required for Retaining Walls 4 feet high or greater. DOCUMENT STANDARDS • Registered Engineer signature and company • Building Permit Applicant • Address • Legal description • Lot lines/Bearings & dimensions • North arrow and scale • Street name • Show all easements of record and any City utilities within those easements • Setbacks of proposed structure and side yard setback of adjacent existing structures ELEVATIONS Jd` ❑ ❑ • Property corners ❑ 0 • Top of curb at the driveway and property line extensions (only if wall is within 30 ft. of curb) ❑ V 0 • Elevations of any existing adjacent homes ,,,e' 0 ❑ • Adequate footing depth of structures due to adjacent utility trenches 0 0 • Waterways (pond, stream, etc.) 0 0 • At the foundation of the building and/or nearest structure PONDING AREA (if applicable) • Easement line • NWL • HWL • Pond # designation • Emergency Overflow Elevation • Pond/Wetland buffer delineation • Shoreland Zoning Overlay District • Conservation Easements RETAINING WALL INFORMATION • Location of Retaining Wall on property • Top & bottom elevation at each end of wall and any change in elevation in between • Type of material (i.e. modular block, boulder, etc.) • Directional drainage arrows with slope/gradient % Reviewed By: G:FORMS/Building Permit Application -Retaining walls Rev. 5-4-09 Date ../Z1‘ A �cclL � City of Ea�afl 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 MAY 1 0 2016 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use �%/ Ii Permit / ng Permit Fee: if 390, j, Date Received:/ ` �, Staff: 2016 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 5/6/2016 Site Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive ti -///6/ c Tenant: - J Suite #: Property Owner Name: MSP Commercial Phone: 651-287-8891 Address / City / Zip: 1215 Town Centre Drive Suite 130 Applicant is: Owner ✓ Contractor Type of Work Description of work: Provide new sprinkler protection for a new 3 story building with und. parking. Construction Cost: 106,500.00Estimated Completion Date: 12-30-2016 Contractor'. Name: Gilbert Mechanical Contractors License#: C010 Address: 4451 W. 76th St. City: Edina State: MN Zip: 55435 Phone: 952-835-3810 Contact: Greg DeMars Ema l: gdemars@gilbertmech.com FIRE PERMIT TYPE 1 Sprinkler System (# of heads ) 67.E Fire Pump _ Standpipe Other: WORK TYPE 1 New _ Addition Alterations Remodel Other: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Commercial Residential Educational FEES $60.00 Permit Fee Minimum Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge $100.00 Residential New (includes State Surcharge) 3/4" Fire Meter - $280.00 Contract Value $ 106,500 x .01 _ $ 1065.00 Permit Fee _ $ 53.25 Surcharge _ $ 1118.25 TOTAL FEE _ $ 280.00 Fire Meter $ 1398.25 TOTAL FEE **Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Suppression System permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x Gregory J DeMars Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Sig r ture 1?‘7 UIRED INSPECTIONS drostatic Flow Alarm Drain Test Rough In Trip Pump Test Central Station // Final Conditions of Issuance: CA64-14-- 41' C!tyofEa�ali ei p^ 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 juL 1q 2016 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Permit #: Permit Fee: Date Received: /r, /` Staff: 2016 COMMERCIAL FIRE ALARM PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 7/14/2016 Site Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive Tenant: Summit Orthopedics Suite #: Property Owner Name: MSP Commercial Phone: Address / City / Zip: Applicant is: 1215 Town Centre Dr #130, Eagan, MN Owner ✓ Contractor Type of Work Description of work: Construction Cost: New Fire Alarm System Estimated Completion Date: 1/31/2017 Contractor Name: ECSI License #: TS002284 Address: 7900 Chicago Ave. South City: Bloomington State: MN Zip: 55420 Phone: 651-735-7470 Contact: Steve Ids° Email: sidso@ecsillc.com Work Type 1 New Remodel Addition Other: Alterations DESCRIPTION OF WORK: 1 Commercial Residential Educational FEES $60.00 Permit Fee Minimum Contract Value $ 85,687.00 x .01 856.87 = $ Permit Fee Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 If the project valuation is over $1 million, please = $ 42.85 Surcharge* call for Surcharge 899.72 = $ TOTAL FEE **Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Alarm permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that 1 understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x Steven Idso Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature FOR OFFICE USE Required Inspections: Rough-ln 1/ Fin d By: Fire Alarm Test a 4,°11° CityofEaaau 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use '{Q t Permit#: L J v6LW Permit Fee: Date Received: 7-7.1 Staff: 2016 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 6-17-16 Site Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive Tenant Name: Summit Orthopedics Name: Eagan Woods I, LLC (Tenant is: ✓ New / Existing) Suite #: Former Tenant: Phone: 651-287-8891 Address / City / Zip: 1215 Town Centre Drive, #130 Eagan MN 55123 Applicant is: Owner ✓ Contractor Description of work: Interior build -out of Clinic, Surgery Suite Address: 701 Washington Ave S, #600 State: MN N Zip: 55401 Phone: 952-837-8674 Contact: Ross Bertelsen Email: ross.bertelsen@rjmconstruction.com Name: Pope Architects Registration #: Address: 1295 Bandana Blvd N, #200 City: St. Paul State: MN Zip: 55108 Phone: 651-642-9200 Contact Person: Denton Mack Email: dmack@popearch.com Licensed plumber installing new sewer/water service: Gilbert Mech Phone #: 952-893-2122 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. Call 48 hours before you intend to dig to receive locates of underground utilities. www.gopherstateonecall.orq hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x Ross Bertelsen Applicant's Printed Name x Applicant's Signature Page 1 of 3 DO NOT WRIT4 BELOW THIS LINE t3w0 SUB TYPES Foundation v Commercial / Industrial Apartments Miscellaneous WORK TYPES New Addition Alteration Replace Salon Owner Change DESCRIPTION Valuation Plan Review (25%_ 100% ✓ ) Census Code # of Units # of Buildings Type of Construction ✓✓ Public Facility Accessory Building Greenhouse / Tent Antennae Interior Improvement Exterior Improvement Repair Water Damage t, ZS$, OOG REQUIRED INSPECTIONS Footings (New Building) Footings (Deck) Footings (Addition) Foundation Drain Tile Roof: _Decking _Insulation ./f Framing Fireplace: Rough In Air Test _Final Occupancy Code Edition Zoning Stories Square Feet Length Width Ice & Water Final ✓ Insulation Meter Size: Exterior Alteration -Apartments Exterior Alteration -Commercial Exterior Alteration -Public Facility Siding Reroof Windows Fire Repair Demolish Building* Demolish Interior Demolish Foundation Retaining Wall *Demolition of entire building - give PCA handout to applicant 8151,S.L 2'/5 Mgt. 3 W/A -tA E x`75 211 v° MCES System SAC Units City Water Booster Pump PRV Fire Sprinklers Sheetrock Final / C.O. Required Final / No C.O. Required Other: RAC S 'PP/k'G yr Pool: Footings Air/Gas Tests Final Siding: _Stucco Lath Stone Lath Brick Windows Retaining Wall Erosion Control Concrete Entrance Apron Final CIO Inspection: Schedule Fire Marshal to be present: /Yes No Reviewed By: aka- , Building Inspector Reviewed By: , Planning COMMERCIAL FEES Base Fee Surcharge Plan Review MCES SAC City SAC S&W Permit & Surcharge Treatment Plant Treatment Plant (Irrigation) Park Dedication Trail Dedication Water Quality 47, 998.7(-- Storm Sewer Trunk 71 L -90 Sewer Trunk 271 9 'fZ - Water Trunk 7/ '{TS. 6-o Street Lateral 5,0 • "b Street Water Lateral Other: Z 5;97 . $a TOTAL: 44 83/ GAG , 8l Page 2 of 3 MCES USE: Letter Reference: 160719B3 Address ID: 703779 Payment ID: 394323 Date of Determination: 07/19/16 Greetings! Please see the determination below. Project Name: Project Address: Suite #/Campus: City Name: Applicant: Determination Expiration: 07/19/18 Summit Orthopedics 2620 Eagan Woods Drive na Eagan Ross Bertelsen, RJM Construction Special Notes: na Charge Calculation: Office: Meeting: Gym: Showers: Lockers: Warehouse: Retail: Sterilizers: Total Charge: 52,094 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft. / SAC = 21.71 344 sq. ft. @ 1650 sq. ft. /SAC=0.21 2007 sq. ft. @ 2060 sq. ft. / SAC = 0.97 1 shower(s) x 2 fixture units @ 17 fixture unit / SAC = 0.12 55 lockers @ 14 lockers / SAC = 3.93 1558 sq. ft. @ 7000 sq. ft. / SAC = 0.22 144 sq. ft. @ 3000 sq. ft. / SAC = 0.05 960 gallons / day @ 274 gallons / SAC = 3.50 30.71 Credit Calculation: Summit Orthopedics (3/16) Office: 66,784 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft. / SAC = 27.83 Warehouse: 817 sq. ft. @ 7000 sq. ft. / SAC = 0.12 Total Credit: Net SAC: 27.95 2.76 — or — 3 SAC Due The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is the City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions email me at: toni.janzig@metc.state.mn.us. Thank you, Toni Janzig SAC Program Technical Specialist Please visit our SAC website by going to: http://www.metrocouncil.org/Wastewater-Water/Funding-Finance/Rates- Charges/Sewer-Availability-Charge.aspx 390 Robert Str, Phone 651.602 An Equal t �pport; t forth j S#. Paul, MN 55 101 1 X05 000 j Fax X51.602.1550 j 11 Y 651.291.0904 j metrocounoi1 org 3 Errap Off, METROPOLITAN 4114'. City of Eapli 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 AUG 01 2016 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink 1 For Office Use Permit #: / s� / / 7 Permit Fee: Z7 Date Received: ') ko Staff: t) 2016 MECHANICAL PERMIT APPLICATION Please /submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: 7 / Z9 7, 4, Site Address: 2-4. Z0 e -4-4.1-7N, 0o05 ®2 / d� Tenant: .5"'11 'T €' 7 nfr--bisS (7-6714# r / eel- orc--'i�n,r-) Suite#: Name: J i .tv» ftl,v SS'/21 Phone: 4, 5- - '768 - 54-38 Address / City / Zip: / '7 &->cc. /1. -,4 --mss c 5r, , / Z2 2- 'r. /°,47",- .' 13 - Name: 4 /r- ireler me4 t'rirc-L License #: Address: 44-s / w - 7 G T7/- ST City: e--20. rr 4 State: 14'1 N Zip: C.--5 - s"-- Phone: 9S2 - 83r- 38/0 Contact: ,Ta /n/ y (1- 4 -AJ Email: ✓ f'i.- - 4o1a- -.i efaNdQ 4/4 -Be �riv/Fe 61. eo.%-i New Replacement Additional Alteration Demolition Description of work: ooi Plea_ re n RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL Furnace New Construction Interior Improvement Air Conditioner Install Piping Processed Air Exchanger .L Gas >. Exterior HVAC Unit Heat Pump Under/Above ground Tank ( Install / Remove) Other RESIDENTIAL FEES $60.00 Minimum Add or alteration to an existing unit, includes State Surcharge $100.00 Residential New, includes State Surcharge COMMERCIAL FEES $60.00 Permit Fee Minimum $75.00 Underground tank installation/removal, includes State Surcharge = $ / � / ° ' ° 0 Permit Fee _$ TOTAL FEE Contract Value $ /� Sf 71 o o o x .01 Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge _ $ 7 19 40 , so Surcharge _ $ / 5i 7c. $ a TOTAL FEE I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x L.2-0 /-fry 4'O A -sot etifw Applicant's Printed Name /0 L. City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 01- 9fari cf • Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use Permit #: Permit Fee: Date Received: 7 -01 - Staff: � Staff: 2016 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 7/22/2016 Site Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive Tenant: Summit Orthopedics Name: Phone: Suite #: Address / City / Zip: Applicant is: Owner Contractor Description of work: Tenant Improvement for 3 story medical bldg. Construction Cost: 84,740.00 Estimated Completion Date: January 2017 Name: Gilbert Mechanical License #: C010 Address: 4451 W. 76th St. city. Edina State: MN Zip: 55435 Phone: 952-835-3810 Contact: Greg DeMars Email: gdemars@gilbertmech.com FIRE PERMIT TYPE 11/ Sprinkler System (# of heads1C1) Fire Pump Other: Standpipe WORK TYPE _ New _ Addition 1(Alterations Remodel Other: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: )( Commercial Residential Educational FEES $60.00 Permit Fee Minimum Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge $100.00 Residential New (includes State Surcharge) 3/4" Fire Meter - $280.00 Contract Value $ 84,740 _ $ 847.4 _$ 42.37 $ 889.77 = $ NA = $ 889.77 x .01 Permit Fee Surcharge TOTAL FEE Fire Meter TOTAL FEE **Requirements: 2 complete sets of drawings and specifications, cut sheets on materials and components to be used I hereby apply for a Fire Suppression System permit and acknowledge that the information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan and with the Minnesota Building/Fire Codes; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x Gregory DeMars Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Sig INSPECTIONS Hydrostatic Trip Conditions of Issuance: 11,1/1"City ufEap 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 Check - AUG 102016 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Usej 1 Permit #: 1 v `�-/ Permit Fee: l01 41. Date Received: Staff: 2016 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION e' Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. �1 Date: 08/09/2016 Site Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Dr Tenant: Summit Orthopedics (Tenant Improvement) Suite #: Name: Summit Orthopedics Phone: 651-968-5438 Name: Gilbert Mechanical License #: Address: 4451 W 76th St City: Edina Phone: 952-835-3810 Email: bids@gilbertmech.com State: MNZip: 55435 ✓ New _ Replacement _ Repair _ Rebuild Modify Space Work in R.O.W. Description of work: COMMERCIAL New Construction Modify Space Irrigation System ( yes / _ no) ( RPZ / PVB) • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems • Avg. GPM (2" turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Meters Call (651) 675-5646 to verity that tests passed prior to picking up meter. Domestic: Size & Type Fire: 1 Avg. GPM High demand devices? Yes _No Flushometers Yes No COMMERCIAL FEES $60.00 Permit Fee Minimum $60.00 PVB/RPZ Permit (includes State Surcharge) Surcharge = Contract Value x $0.0005 If the project valuation is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge Following fees apply when installing a new lawn irrigation system Contact the City's Engineering Department, (651) 675-5646, for required fee amounts. Contract Value $ 692,000.00 = $ 6,920.00 = $ 346.00 = $ 7,266.00 x .01 Permit Fee Surcharge TOTAL FEE $ Water Permit $ Treatment Plant $ Water Supply & Storage $ State Surcharge $ 7,266.00 TOTAL FEE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. \ I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x Logan Daum Applicant's Printed Name rowed I est Gas Test Final PRV Requit~ d Min Page 1 of 3 4,11 City of Ea�ali 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Phone: (651) 675-5675 Fax: (651) 675-5694 r L Use BLUE or BLACK Ink For Office Use ; �� Permit #: / i 1� /} �j'' Permit Fee: `'/ C�� 0 t/ Date Received: w 1 Staff: 2016 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION ❑ Please submit two (2) sets of plans with all commercial applications. Date: Site Address: (96 �� •6-6)1,0605... D • Tenant: (Il. %yi. 11,1t 0,1110 -r< Suite #: Own ®,n B 4 Name: Phone: r3 011tracto yC-3 Name: /� Imo' //1 if,. C'96/e-":71License #: />' �'. / / Address: ilii -/ �, C , 44 `k-"7 City: State: Zip: /� 6/ / ---3 i/d �/� �`� - tt �1 il / -�/ Phone: �c� - �-�s' Email: C�614120P!'(06, @ Ob e of New Replacement Repair Rebuild Modify Space Work in R.O.W. — — — — — Description of work: 4 mit ij�e x . " z MERCIAL New o truction Modify Space / Irrigation System ( yes / no) ( RPZ / PVB) / thC-- • Rain sensors required on irrigati n sy tems • Avg. GPM (2" turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) 11.637 �7, �� ` �+' Meters Call (651) 675-5646 to verity that tests passed prior to picking up meter. i Domestic: Size & Type Fire: 1 Avg. GPM High demand devices? —Yes No Flushometers —Yes No COMMERCIAL FEES $60.00 Permit Fee OZ, 'o•O- Contract Value $ x .01 Minimum 6c- 0 $60.00 PVB/RPZ Permit Surcharge = Contract If the project valuation = $ D Permit Fee n (includes State Surcharge) =$ �� ®� a, t p4& t�d1 Value x $0.0005 is over $1 million, please call for Surcharge = $ TOTAL FEE Following fees apply Contact the City's Engineering when installing a new lawn irrigation system $ 'Z6 0 . o b Wateremmt-,- 1 / I /i4 Department, (651) 675-5646, for required fee amounts. $ Treatment Plant $ Water Supply & Storage $ State Surcharge = $ L-1 - O h TOTAL FEE CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. \ I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approvall s. x 4f®ryt r Applicantrinted Name x Cog Applican ignature eter Relat Page 1 of 3 Use BLUE or BLACK Ink 2016 SEWER AND WATER CONNECTION AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY (if applicable) Date: FOROIf p yup ed ty Property Owner: Address: Phone Number: ®'n#i -0 Plumber: Contact Name: Sewer Service Water Service Water lateral charge Water trunk Water supply storage Receipt #: , Date: { �.i° Sewer lateral charge c JQze% Sewer trunk ` ` City SAC @ $110/unit 1,.) Ps MCES SAC @ $2,485/unit Receipt #: , Date: Treatment Plant @ $862.50/unit-A Permit Fee, including State Surcharge *Plumbing Permit Required — water meter to be acquired with building permit TOTAL: Permit Fee, including State Surcharge $65.00 $65.00 TOTAL: t /DO Sewer Service Water Service Sewer lateral charge Water lateral charge Sewer trunk Water trunk City SAC MCES SAC Receipt # , Date Water supply & storage Receipt # , Date Treatment plant Permit Fee, including State *Plumbing Permit Required — water acquired with building permit Surcharge $129.00 meter to be TOTAL: Number of SAC units is determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (bbl) 602-1000. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Connection Charge applies if not charged sewer trunk by assessment in the past. 1-5 SAC units 1,915.50 per SAC unit 6-10 SAC units 9,579.70 plus 445.00 per SAC unit over 5 11+ SAC units 11,980.60 plus 178.00 per SAC unit over 10 r Permit #: Permit Fee: Date Received: Staff: 1 Cc: City of Eagan Finance Department Page 2 of 3 Peggy Fleck From: Charlie Borash Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 10:03 AM To: Peggy Fleck Cc: Sharon Sullivan Subject: 2620 Eaganwoods Drive — ,��/j 01/2-441.0 talked to the plumber here and he is good to go for a 1" irrigation meter. Charlie Borash Field Maintenance Supervisor City of Eagan Utilities Dept. (651)675-5222 cborash@cityofeagan.com z7 g 119 Dale Schoeppner From: Bjorklund, Gary(DU) <Gary.Bjorklund@state.mn.us> Sent: Monday,January 30, 2017 2:35 PM To: 'lisa.mellen@us.schindler.com'; 'robert.ferrara@us.schindler.com'; Dale Schoeppner; DU.Elevator.ETrakit Subject: Final Approval for Permit Work at 2620 Eagan Woods Dr, EAGAN SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION: The ELV INSTALL permit work.has.b.eerLcom•leted and approved for the following project: Permit Number: Ely/609-00-107 Project Nam %'SUMMIT ORTHOPEDIC' CAR 1 Site Loc ilo --- }EaganV oo s r, EA The Department of p Labor and Industry is required to inspect and provide approvals on elevator related devices prior to allowing them to be placed into service. An Inspector from the Elevator Safety Section recently performed an inspection of the work performed under the permit listed at the site above.The new installation is in compliance with the Department rules for elevators. NOTE: Compliance with Minnesota Rules and the ANSI/ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators does not necessarily assure compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. CONSTRUCTION CODES & LICENSING DIVISION Elevator Section 1 Dale Schoeppner From: Bjorklund, Gary(DLI) <Gary.Bjorklund@state.mn.us> Sent: Monday,January 30, 2017 2:37 PM To: 'lisa.mellen@us.schindler.com'; 'robert.ferrara@us.schindler.com'; Dale Schoeppner; DLI.EIevator.ETrakit Subject: Final Approval for Permit Work at 2620 Eagan Woods Dr, EAGAN SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION: The ELV INSTALL permit work has been completed and approved for the following project: Permit Number: ELV 10108 Project Name: S ►�_�._,, :• I►.��y .n,� i� Site Locati. - 620 E.gan Woods Dr, A The Department of La"or and Industry is required to inspect and provide approvals on elevator related devices prior to allowing them to be placed into service. An Inspector from the Elevator Safety Section recently performed an inspection of the work performed under the permit listed at the site above.The new installation is in compliance with the Department rules for elevators. NOTE: Compliance wth Minnesota Rules and the ANSI/ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators does not necessarily assure compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. CONSTRUCTION CODE6 & LICENSING DIVISION Elevator Section 1 Dale Schoeppner From: Bjorklund, Gary (DLI) <Gary.Bjorklund@state.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday,January 31, 2017 11:15 AM To: 'lisa.mellen@us.schindler.com'; 'robert.ferrara@us.schindler.com'; Dale Schoeppner; DI1.EIevator.ETrakit Subject: Final Approval for Permit Work at 2620 Eagan Woods Dr, EAGAN SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION: The ELV INSTALL permit work has been completed and approved for the following project: Permit Number: ELV1609-00109 Project Na : SUMMIT ORTHOPEDICS CAR 3 Site Locatio . 2620 Eagan Woods Dr, EAGAN The Department of Labor and Industry is required to inspect and provide approvals on elevator related devices prior to allowing them to be placed into service. An Inspector from the Elevator Safety Section recently performed an inspection of the work performed under the permit listed at the site above.The new installation is in compliance with the Department rules for elevators. NOTE: Compliance with Minnesota Rules and the ANSI/ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators does not necessarily assure compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. CONSTRUCTION CODES & LICENSING DIVISION Elevator Section 1 .iguic PI' /35170 i* yl� I WoMb # 20 TO: Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Joe Gibbs, Finance Jared Flewellen, Parks & Recreation Jon Eaton, Utilities Josh Wilske, IT Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Mike Lence Date: 2/22/2016 Project Name: Summit Orthopedics Sub Type,Work Type: New Building Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive The plans are located in the Plan Review area in Community Development. Please review and indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form. Please submit a response within 7 days. Comments: V CJ 1'V Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required ❑ Yes ❑ No REF Reconciliation between Engineering &Finance Q4 -- C,)Nia.ill Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final&Plan Review Letters City of Eaall MON # 20 TO: Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, En•ineering t aron 'elson, En•inee Dave Westermayer, ngineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Joe Gibbs, Finance Jared Flewellen, Parks&Recreation Jon Eaton, Utilities Josh Wilske, IT Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Mike Lence Date: 2/22/2016 Project Name: Summit Orthopedics Sub Type,Work Type: New Building Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive The plans are located in the Plan Review area in Community Development. Please review and indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form. Please submit a response within 7 days. Comments: {ur\l\- ( A 'C �"zN.' Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes 0 No Landscape Security Required Zoning: O Yes g No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: O Yes 0 No Park Dedication ❑ Yes 0 No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes 0 No Tree Dedication it Yes ❑ No PRV Required Yes 0 No REF Reconciliation between Engineering& Finance 31L Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final&Plan Review Letters 41,11/1' City of Eaaali Memo # 20 TO: Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Joe Gibbs, Finance Jared Flewellen, Parks& Recreation Jon Eaton, Utilities Josh Wilske, IT Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Mike Lence Date: 2/22/2016 Project Name: Summit Orthopedics Sub Type,Work Type: New Building Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive The plans are located in the Plan Review area in Community Development. Please review and indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form. Please submit a response within 7 days. Comments: time Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes 0 No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes 0 No Park Dedication ❑ Yes 0 No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes 0 No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes 0 No PRV Required ❑ Yes 0 No REF Reconciliation between Engineering & Finance Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final&Plan Review Letters City of Eagali Meso # 20 TO: Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Mike Ridley, Planning Darrin Bramwell, Fire Marshal Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Russ Matthys, Engineering John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Dave Westermayer, Engineering Leon Weiland, Engineering Joe Gibbs, Finance Jared Flewellen, Parks & Recreation Jon Eaton, Utilities Josh Wilske, IT Eric Macbeth, Maintenance Gregg Hove, Maintenance Lt. Mike Fineran, Police FROM: Mike Lence Date: 2/22/2016 Project Name: Summit Orthopedics Sub Type,Work Type: New Building Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive The plans are located in the Plan Review area in Community Development. Please review and indicate any concerns you have with these plans and resolve these issues with the affected parties. If you are requesting that issuance of the building permit be held, please submit the proper"hold request"form. Please submit a response within 7 days. Comments: Indicate below any fees that are to be collected with the building permit. Amount ❑ Yes ❑ No Landscape Security Required Zoning: ❑ Yes ❑ No Water Quality Dedication Meter Size: ❑ Yes ❑ No Park Dedication ❑ Yes 0 No Trail Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No Tree Dedication ❑ Yes ❑ No PRV Required ❑ Yes ❑ No REF Reconciliation between Engineering & Finance $7� ! 1 4. Josh Wilske [.V 2016.02.22 14:50:50-06'00' Signature Date G:\Building Inspections\FORMS\Commercial Bldgs Final&Plan Review Letters 4,111° City of Eau .... MeMo Jill Hutmacher, Community Development TO: Mike Ridley, Planning Dale Schoeppner, Building Inspections Scott Peterson, Building Inspections Craig Novaczyk or Mike Grannes, Building Inspections Sarah Thomas, Planning Pam Dudziak, Planning Joe Gibbs, Utility Billing Damn Bramwell, Fire Department John Gorder, Engineering Aaron Nelson, Engineering Paul Graham, Parks Eric Macbeth, Water Resources Gregg Thompson, Water Resources Jon Eaton, Utilities FROM: Mike Grannes Date: 1/19/17 SUBJECT: Final Inspection for: Project Name: Summit Orthopedics Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive The Inspections Division will be performing a final inspection at the above referenced property on 1/?/17 • If you have cause for not granting the Certificate of Occupancy, please submit a "hold request"to my attention. The person/department requesting a hold is responsible for notifying and resolving problems with the affected parties. 19. Before the city issues a Certificate of Occupancy on the development site,the applicant shall provide the City Engineer as-built plans that demonstrate that all constructed stormwater conveyance structures, stormwater management facilities (sumps, infiltration practices, etc.), and soil management strategies conform to design and/or construction plans, as approved by the City. As-built volumes(for retention)shall be provided for all infiltration practices. The applicant shall submit to the City Engineer certification that the stormwater management facilities have been installed in accord with the plans and specifications approved. This certification shall be provided by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 443 Lafayette Road N. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF (651)284-5005 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 _ INDUSTRY1-800-342-5354 www.dli.mn.gov PROJECT JURISDICTION AGREEMENT BUILDING OFFICIAL: Date: 4/19/2016 City of Eagan Building Official Dale Schoeppner 3830 Pilot Knob Rd Eagan, MN 55122 App "1 2 2316 Project: SUMMIT ORTHOPEDICS OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER Location: EAGAN, MN Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Dr State Plan Review Number: BLD1604-00109 Date Received: 4/18/2016 Building Official: Pursuant to the Municipal Delegation Agreement between the Minnesota Construction Codes and Licensing Division and the CITY OF EAGAN attached is a copy of the notice to the Architect / Designer of the project described above delegating building code administration to your office per agreement. Sincerely, CONSTRUCTION CODES AND LICENSING DIVISION Jerry Norman Supervisor Building Plan Review GN:jh ENC This information can be provided to you in alternative formats(Braille,large print or audio). An Equal Opportunity Employer This information can be provided to you in alternative formats(Braille,large print or audio). An Equal Opportunity Employer 443 Lafayette Road N. A I N N 1ESOTA DEPARTMENT OF (651)284-5005 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 1-800-342-5354 www.dli.mn.gov INDUSTRY PERMIT JURISDICTION AGREEMENT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: Date: 4/19/2016 Denton Mack Pope Architects 1295 Bandana Blvd N Ste 200 AR 2 2016 St Paul, MN 55108 Project: SUMMIT ORTHOPEDICS OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER Location: EAGAN, MN Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Dr State Plan Review Number: BLD1604-00109 Date Received: 4/18/2016 Pursuant to our Municipal Delegation Agreement between the Minnesota Construction Codes and Licensing Division and the CITY OF EAGAN BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS WILL BE DONE BY THE CITY OF EAGAN Please submit all plans, specifications, and appropriate fees to the CITY OF EAGAN. You must follow their submittal process and fee schedule. Please refer to our State Plan Review Number for their tracking purposes. Please be advised that this Permit Jurisdiction agreement is NOT an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry (MNDLI) Plumbing Plan Review and Inspection Unit. Plumbing plans, specifications, and appropriate fees must be submitted to the Plumbing Plan Review and Inspection Unit. For additional information concerning MNDLI plumbing plan reviews and inspections please visit www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/Plumbinq.asp Sincerely, CONSTRUCTION CODES & LICENSING DIVISION Jerry Norman Supervisor Building Plan Review GN:jh C: City of Eagan Building Official, Dale Schoeppner This information can be provided to you in alternative formats(Braille,large print or audio). An Equal Opportunity Employer 1g192p,�1' Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry Construction Codes and Licensing Division /*,;." r Building Plan Review I MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF443 Lafayette Road North j" 6 .., LABOR INDUSTRY St. Paul, MN 55155 �� APR 2 Phone: (651)284-5857 +r ,vv;-.0, ; 2 2018 www.dli.mn.qov/CCLD/PlanConstruction.aspi\o ,r0,� Cs-,-=:c.'.a`, i.. Initial Application r. `z c PROJE INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE g PROJECTED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION Summit Orthopedics Outpatient Surgery Center $10,000,000 °PROJECT LOCATION (number and street name) COUNTY )? Eagan Woods Drive Dakota PROJECT CITY or PROJECT TOWNSHIP (Enter only the city or township, not both) ❑Check if outside city limits Eagan OWNER(OR STATE AGENCY IF APPLICABLE) (OR ISD#IF APPLICABLE) CONTACT PERSON Summit Orthopedics Bill Frommelt ADDRESS PHONE 710 Commerce Drive, Suite 200 (651) 968-5870 CITY STATE ZIP CODE E-MAIL Woodbury MN 55125 bfrommelt@summitortho.com DESIGN FIRM PROJECT CONTACT Pope Architects Denton Mack ADDRESS PHONE 1295 Bandana Blvd. N. , Suite 200 (651) 789-1640 CITY STATE ZIP CODE E-MAIL St Paul MN 55108 dmack@popearch.com PROJECT TYPE (As defined by MN Statute 326B.103 Subd.11 and Subd.13) ❑ State Owned-A building and its grounds the cost of which are paid for by the state or state agency regardless of its cost. ❑ Public School District-A school district building projector charter school building project,the cost of which is$100,000 or more. State Licensed Facilit -A building and its grounds that are licensed by the state as a: hospital, EJ nursing home, ❑supervised living facility, 0 free-standing outpatient surgical center, Elcorrectional facility, ❑ boarding care, ❑residential hospice. If your project is not licensed specifically as listed above,the project is not under the jurisdiction of the Building Plan Review Unit. CLASS OF WORK ❑✓ New Building Construction ❑Addition ❑ Remodeling Sprinklers Yes 0 No Partial ❑ Permit Only(submit documentation from regional building official) ANTICIPATED START DATE 07/15/2016 IBC OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION(S) IBC TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION B Occupancy II-B PROJECT DESCRIPTION Outpatient Surgery Center, physical therapy, and clinic project. APPLICANT INFORMATION Upon receiving this completed initial application,we will confirm proper jurisdiction for the project and assign a project number.We will notify you in writing of the project number,where to submit your documents for review, and how inspections will be handled. If delegated to the municipality,you will need to follow their procedures and fee schedule. Otherwise our standard application process will need to be followed. I completed the information on this application and u. - - , that it does not authorize the start of construction. APPLICANT NAME(PRINT) ' '•LICANT S GNAT DATE PHONE Denton Mack 04/18/2016 (651)789-1640 APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS S TE ZIP E-MAIL 1295 Bandana Blvd N, Suite 200 St Paul MN 55108 dmack@popearch.com FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ❑State [' Local Insp. [Local Both BLD- v004_00101 This material can be made available in different forms. To request,call 1-800-342-5354(DIAL-DLI). BCS 01R(1/14) 443 Lafayette Road N. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF (651)284-5005 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155IRB IND= (80 j DIAL-DLI www.dli.mn.gov („ TTY: 651 297-4198 Division of Construction Codes and Licensing REPORT ON PLUMBING PLANS PROJECT: Summit Orthopedics Interior Plumbing,2620 Eagan Woods Drive,Eagan,Dakota County, Minnesota,Plan No.PLB1606-00181 OWNERSHIP: Summit Orthopedics,710 Commerce Drive, Suite 200,Woodbury,MN 55125 SUBMITTER: Gilbert Mechanical Contractors Inc.,4451 West 76th Street,Edina,MN 55435 Plans Dated: May 25,2016; Signed: June 3,2016 Date Received: June 16,2016,June 15,2016 Date Approved: August 9,2016 This review is limited to the provisions of the Minnesota Plumbing Code,Minnesota Rules,Chapter 4714 and assumes the data on which the design is based are correct. Approval is contingent upon meeting the requirement(s) listed below. A copy of the approved plans and this report must be retained at the project location. INSPECTIONS: All plumbing installations must be tested and inspected in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota Plumbing Code. No plumbing work may be covered prior to inspection. The contractor/installer must obtain all required inspection permits from the city of Eagan Building Official. REQUIREMENT(S): 1. The following comments pertain to the proposed flushing rim clinic sinks located in Rooms 3031 and 3083 (Fixture P-12). a. A'h-inch cold water supply branch is show serving the flushing rim sink in Room 3083 on Sheets P2.1 and P6.2. Verify that the water supply to this fixture is sized per the manufacturer's requirements, or 1 inch at a minimum. b. The flushing rim sinks are labeled as lavatories on Sheet P3.1. 2. The drain branch serving the two counter sinks,washer box,and floor drain in Room Nos. 2088 and 2089 must be at least 2'/2 inches in size(see Minnesota Rules,Chapter 4714,Table 703.2). The 2-inch drain branch shown is undersized. 3. The plans specify a handheld drench hose with the emergency eyewash(Fixture P-18).A pressure type backflow preventer must be installed at least 12 inches above the highest point the eyewash hose could be used(see Minnesota Rules,Chapter 4714, Sections 603.5.7 and 301.1.2). 4. Public-use lavatories must have an ASSE 1070 mixing valve limiting the hot water temperature to 110 degrees Fahrenheit or less(see Minnesota Rules,Chapter 4714, Section 421.2). 5. The water connection to the automatic clothes washer must be protected by the use of an air gap or an approved backflow preventer(see Minnesota Rules,Chapter 4714, Sections 602.3). 6. Changes in direction in drainage piping must be made by appropriate use of wyes and bends(see Minnesota Rules,Chapter 4714, Section 706.0). Sanitary tees are not allowed where the direction of flow changes from either vertical to horizontal or horizontal to horizontal. 7. A cleanout shall be provided on a common vertical fixture drain or common vent serving two fixture traps that connect to a vertical drain at the same level. The cleanout shall be the same nominal pipe size as the drain serving the fixtures. Where the vertical fixture drain is accessible through the trap opening,the cleanout may be eliminated(see Minnesota Rules,Chapter 4714, Section 707.4.1). This information can be provided to you in alternative formats(Braille,large print or audio). An Equal Opportunity Employer Summit Orthopedics Interior Plumbing Plumbing Plan No. PLB1606-00181 Page 2 of 3 August 9,2016 8. Each horizontal drain branch,including floor drain branches,shall be provided with a cleanout at its upper terminal with the following exceptions(see Minnesota Rules,Chapter 4714, Section 707.4): a. A cleanout may be omitted if the drain branch line is less than five feet,unless the drain serves sinks or urinals. b. A cleanout may be omitted on a drain that is 72 degrees or less from the vertical. 9. The installation of reduced pressure zone assemblies,double check valve assemblies,pressure vacuum breakers,spill-proof vacuum breakers,reduced pressure detector fire protection assemblies,or double check detector fire protection assemblies is permitted only when a testing and inspection program acceptable to the administrative authority is provided(see Minnesota Rules,Chapter 4714, Section 603.5.23). The administrative authority and water purveyor must be notified prior to installation. Devices must be tested upon initial installation and not less than annually,and records must be kept. Installations must be at least 12 inches and not more than 5 feet above the finished floor or ground level unless a permanent platform for access is provided. A backflow prevention fact sheet may be viewed at: http://www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/PDF/fs backflow.pdf 10. The following comments pertain to Item No. 3 under the Plumbing Specifications and Notes on Sheet P7.0: a. Hubless cast iron pipe must comply with current version of CISPI 301 or ASTM A888. Subitem B references CISPS Standard 301-69T,which is an outdated version of the standard. Pipe and fittings shall be marked with country of origin and identification of the original manufacturer in addition to markings required by referenced standards. b. Subitem C refers to copper water distribution,which does not pertain to the drain,waste,and vent system. The comment references ASTM Standard 388; the correct reference is ASTM Standard B88. 11. Above-ground PVC drain,waste,and vent systems should utilize restraint fittings or a minimum 24-inch offset using 45-degree fittings every 30 feet. Expansion joints installed per the manufacturer's instructions may be installed in vertical runs exceeding 30 feet(see Minnesota Rules,Chapter 4714,Installation Standards 5 and 9). 12. This plan review is for the plumbing systems only and does not pertain to the health care licensing requirements for the facility. Prior to the start of any construction,complete plans and specifications must be submitted to and approved by the Minnesota Department of Health(MDH),Division of Compliance Monitoring. Please visit http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/fpc/engineering/index.html regarding information necessary for plan review and licensing. Please note that changes to the plumbing system may be required as a result of the review by MDH. Changes to the plumbing system must be reviewed by this office prior to installation. NOTE(S): 1. The scope of this project consists of the interior build-out of a new building. The plumbing installation includes water closets,a urinal,lavatories,showers,electric water coolers,exam room sinks,counter sinks, scrub sinks,three-compartment decontamination room sink,flushing rim clinic sinks,a clothes washer, laundry tub,mop sinks, floor sinks,floor drains,emergency eyewashes,wall hydrants,double-wall heat exchanger,domestic water storage tanks,water supplies with reduce pressure zone(RPZ)backflow preventers to sterilizers and decontamination/OR equipment,and a reverse osmosis(RO)water treatment system. 2. This facility will be served by new municipal water and sewer services. The utility plans and shell building plans were reviewed under PLB 1603-00008. Summit Orthopedics Interior Plumbing Plumbing Plan No. PLB 1606-00181 Page 3 of 3 August 9,2016 3. The current Minnesota Plumbing Code,Chapter 4714, and related information can be found at: http://www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/Plumbing.asp Authorization for installation may be withdrawn not undertaken within one year. Additional recommendations or requirements may be made if changed conditions or additional information make improvements necessary. Approved: Colleen Erickson Public Health Engineer Plumbing Plan Review and Inspections Unit 651/284-5881 Colleen.Erickson@state.mn.us www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/Plumbing.asp cc: Summit Orthopedics Gilbert Mechanical Contractors Inc. City of Eagan Building Official MDH Compliance Monitoring Division File a HYACIVlandatory Provisions Part II, Page 2 Project Name:Summit Orthopedics(Tenant Improvements) Contact Person:John Gorman, P.E. Telephone:952-893-3810 Systems Worksheet(6.4) System Tag j RTU-4 RTU-5 FCU-1 FCU-2 B1,B-2 Supply CFM 2,250 2,000 2,500 2,500 N/A DX Cooling Capacity 108.59 MBH 59.67 MBH 62.6 MBH 62.6 MBH N/A Supply Motor HP 3.0 HP 2.0 HP 1.5 HP 1.5 HP N/A OA CFM(i.e.Outdoor Air CFM) 300 300 N/A N/A N/A Deadband(6.4.3.1.2) C1 Cl C1 C1 C1 Automatic Shutdown(6.4.3.3.1) C1 C1 N1 C1 Cl Setback Controls(6.4.3.3.2) Cl Cl N1 Cl Cl Setup Controls(6.4.3.3.2) C1 C1 N1 Cl Cl Optimum Start(6.4.3.3.3) C1 C1 N1 Cl Cl Zone Isolation(6.4.3.3.4) Y y Y Y Y OSA Shutoff Dampers(6.4.3.4.2) Cl C1 N/A N/A N/A Exhaust/Relief Shutoff Dampers(6.4.3.4.2) C1 C1 N/A N/A N/A Damper Leakage(6.4.3.4.3) C1 Cl N/A N/A N/A Heat Pump Aux Heat(6.4.3.5) N1 N1 N1 N1 N1 Humidifier Preheat(6.4.3.6) N1 N1 Cl C1 N1 Humidification/Dehumidification Deadband(6.4.3.7) Cl Cl Cl Cl N1 Ventilation Control for High Occupancy Areas(6.4.3.9) C1 C1 N3 N3 N/A Single Zone Fan Control(6.4.3.10) N2 N2 N2 N2 N3 Duct/Plenum Insulation(6.4.4.1.2) N1 N1 N1 N1 N1 Duct Sealing Levels(6.4.4.2.1)Supply/Return A/A C/C C/C B/B N/A Duct Leakage Test(6.4.4.2.2) JN N N N N In the table above,enter the appropriate codes Optimum Start(6.4.3.3.3) Humidification/Dehumidification Dead Band from this list: • Cl Optimum start provided (6.4.3.7) Dead Band(6.4.3.1.2) •• N1 N/A continuous operation • Cl Complying controls provided Cl Duals.4.3.1.point control • N2 N/A heatung and cooling_515 kbtu/h • N1 N/A no humidification and/or • C2 Manual change over control (4.4 kW)and manual on/off dehumidification • N1 N/A special occupancy(requires • N3 N/A supply=10,000 cfm(4,700 Us) • Ventilation Control for High Occupancy Areas OSA Shutoff Dampers 6 4.3.4.2 approval) ( ) (6.4.3.9) • N2 N/A heating or cooling only • Cl Motorized shutoff dampers • Cl All zones comply with 6.4.3.9 • C2 Gravity shutoff dampers on OA and • N1 N/A exhaust air energy recovery Automatic Shutdown(6.4.3.3.1) building in climate zone 1,2 or 3 complies with 6.5.6.1 • Cl Complying 7-day timeclock with • N1 N/A OA<=300 cfm(142 Us) • N2 N/A system is multiple zone and has override Exhaust/Relief Shutoff Dampers(6.4.3.4.2) pneumatic controls • C2 Complying Occupant sensor Cl• Motorized shutoff •dampers on exhaust • N3 N/A design OSA<1,200 cfm(5701/s) • C3 Complying manually operated and relief • N4 N/A design OSA minus transfer(or timeswitch C2 Gravity shutoff dampers on exhaust and make up air)<1,200 cfm(570 Us) • C4 Complying security system interlock • relief and the building is less than three • C5 Complying residential system with 2- stories in height Single Zone Fan Control(6.4.3.10) day timeclock • Cl Complies with 6.4.3.10 • Ni N/A continuous operation Damper Leakage(6.4.3.4.3) • p Cl OSA,exhaust and relief dampers <5 p(3.7 CHW unit with supply motor hp • N2 N/A heatung and cooling_< • <5hkW) 15 kbtu/h (4.4 kW)and manual on/off comply with Table 6.4.3.4.3 • N2 N/A DX unit with cooling capacity Zone Isolation(6.4.3.3.4) <110 kBtu/h(32 kW) Setback Controls(6.4.3.3.2) • Cl Isolation areas provided • N3 N/A multiple Zone Unit • Cl Setback provided(down to 55F(13C) • N1 N/A continuous operation • N1 N/A continuous operation Duct/Plenum Insulation(6.4.4.1.2) • N2 N/A 515 kBtu/h(4.4 kW)or s3/4 hp • N2 N/A heatung and cooling 515 kbtu/h (0.56 kW) • Cl Complying insulation provided (4.4 kW)and manual on/off • N3 N/A all zones on same schedule • N1 N/A all ducts located in conditioned • N3 N/A not in climate zone 2 to 8 • N4 N/A OA/EA<=5,000 cfm(2,360 I/s) space • N4 N/A radiant heating • NS N/A no heating Heat Pump Aux Heat(6.4.3.5) Duct Sealing(6.4.4.2.1) • Cl Complying controls provided • Enter highest seal level(A,B or C)for Setup Controls(6.4.3.3.2) • N1 N/A system is not a heat pump supply and return • Cl Setup provided(up to 90F(32C)) • N2 N/A auxiliary is not electric or is not Duct Leakage Test(6.4.4.2.2) • N1 N/A continuous operation provided • Y Ducts will be tested for leakage • N2 N/A heatung and cooling 515 kbtu/h • N3 N/A heat pump covered by NAECA • N Ducts will not be tested for leakage (4.4 kW)and manual on/off Humidifier Preheat(6.4.3.6) • N3 N/A not in climate zone lb,2b or 3b • Cl Complying controls provided • N4 N/A no cooling • Ni N/A no humidifier User's Manual for ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 Forms-3 - . HVAC Mandatory Provisions Part II, Page 1 Mandatory Equipment Efficiency Worksheet(6.4.1.1) Minimum Efficiency Size Category Sub-Category or Rating Units of Efficiency (Tables 6.8.1A through K) Equipment Type (Tables 6.8.1A Condition (Tables 6.8.1A System Tag (Tables 6.8.1 A through K) through K) (Tables 6.8.1A through K) through K) Rated >_ Required RTU-4 Air conditioners,air cooled 65 MBH-135 MBH Split system and single pack EER/IEER 11.7/13.8 >_ 11.0/11.2 RTU-5 Air conditioners,air cooled Less than 65 MBH Split system Single package SEER 13.5 >_ 13.0 RTU-4,RTU-5 Warm-Air Furnace,Gas Less than 225 MBH Maximum Capacity Et 80% >_ 80% FCU-1,FCU-2 Air conditioners,air cooled Less than 65 MBH Split system SCOP 3.75 >_ 2.20 B-1,B-2 Boilers, Hot water 300MBH-2,500 MBH Gas-fired Thermal Efficiency 94% >_ 75% Mandatory Non-Standard Centrifugal Chiller Worksheet(6.4.1.1) Table 6.8.1C Minimum Type and Efficiency&Adjusted Minimum Efficiency(Tables Leaving Leaving Factors for Adjusted Size Efficiency 6.8.1 H through J) Evaporator Condenser Efficiency from 6.4.1.2 Category Chiller Temperature Temperature (Table Path Table 6.8.1C Tag (°F) (°F) A/B 6.8.1C) (A or B) Value/Adjusted value Rated >_ Required / / >_ / / >_ / / >_ / / >_ General Mandatory Requirements ❑ Enclosed parking garage ventilation U Independent perimeter heating All heating and cooling equipment systems meet the requirements of systems(if any)comply with the (6.4.3.4.5). control requirements of 6.4.3.1.1. meet minimum efficiencies as required in Tables 6.8.1 (A through K)(6.4.1). ❑ Freeze protection or snow-melting ❑ Independent heating and cooling Load calculations are provided for systems meet the requirements of thermostatic controls(if any)are 6.4.3.8 interlocked to prevent crossover of set selection of all equipment and systems points(6.4.3.2). (6.4.2.1). X Piping insulation meets or exceeds the requirements of section 6.4.4.1.3. Q Sensible heating panels are insulated LI Pump head calculations are provided per 6.4.4.1.3 for selection of all pumps(6.4.2.2). Construction documents require Zone control complies with the record drawings(6.7.2.1),manuals Q Radiant floor heating is insulated per (6.7.2.2),system balancing(6.7.2.3) 6.4.4.1.5 requirements of 6.4.3.1.1 and system commissioning(6.7.2.4). XStair and elevator shaft vents provided with motorized dampers(6.4.3.4.1) Special Mandatory Requirements XVentilation fans with motors greater ❑ Freeze protection or snow/ice melting than 0.75 hp(1.0 kW)have automatic systems(if any)have controls to controls complying with Section prevent operation in warm weather 6.4.3.4.4. (6.4.3.8). ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 HVAC Prescriptive Requirements Part III, Page 1 Project Name:Summit Orthopedics(TI) Contact Person:John Gorman, P.E. Telephone:952-835-3810 Prescriptive Checklist Prescriptive Air-System Requirements U Hydronic heat pump systems and water U Radiant heating systems comply with All systems comply with simultaneous cooled AC units comply with the 6.5.8 requirements of 6.5.4.4. heating and cooling limitations �( U Heat recovery for service water (6.5.2). ):E( Chilled and condenser water piping heating is provided for facilities that Prescriptive Hydronic System systems are sized in compliance with operate continuously,have a total Requirements 6.5.4.5 water-cooled heat rejection capacity exceeding 6,000,000 Btu/h(1,758 Prescriptive Special System Requirements Hydronic systems meet the variable kW),and have a design service water flow requirements of 6.5.4.1 heating load exceeding 1,000,000 Heat rejection systems comply with Btu/h(293 kW).The heat recovery Chillers and boilers in parallel have section 6.5.5 system(if any)complies with 6.5.6.2. isolation controls per 6.5.4.2 U Kitchen exhaust systems comply with U The cooling equipment with hot-gas Chilled and hot water systems meet 6.5.7.1 bypass controls(if any)meets the he temperature reset requirements unloading requirements of 6.5.9. t 6.5.4.3 U Laboratory exhaust systems comply with of6.5.7.2 A-.Trr/n nr.T Ar- /rr.n n. 1 1 ff 4 01,14„ HVAC Prescriptive Requirements Part III, Page 2 IProject Name:Summit Orthopedics(TI) Contact Person:John Gorman, P.E. Telephone:952-835-3810 Systems Worksheet(6.5) System Tag RTU-4 RTU-5 FCU-1 FCU-2 Supply CFM 2,250 2,000 2,500 2,500 Cooling Capacity 108.59 MBH 59.67 MBH 62.6 MBH 62.6 MBH Heating Capacity 72.9 MBH 81 MBH N/A N/A OA CFM(i.e.Outdoor Air CFM) 300 300 N/A N/A Economizer(6.5.1) C1 C1 N/A N/A Dehumidification(6.5.2.3) N2 N2 N/A N/A Humidification(6.5.2.4) N1 N1 C2 C2 VAV Fan Control(6.5.3.2.1) Cl Cl N2 N2 VAV Fan Static Pressure Control(6.5.3.2.2 and 6.5.3.2.3) C2 C2 N2 N2 Multiple Zone VAV System Ventilation Control(6.5.3.3) C2 C2 N2 N2 Supply air temperature reset control(6.5.3.4) Cl Cl C1 C1 Cl Exhaust air energy recovery(6.5.6.1) N1 N1 N1 N1 N1 In the table above,enter the appropriate • N5 N/A system meets exception d to Supply air temperature reset control codes from this list: 6.5.2.3 (6.5.3.4) Economizer(6.5.1) • N6 N/A system meets exception e to • Cl System employs supply air 6.5.2.3 temperature reset per 6.5.3.4 • Cl System employs air-economizer • N7 N/A system meets exception f to • N1 N/A system serves a single zone and complying with 6.5.1.1,6.5.1.3 and 6.5.2.3 complies with 6.4.3.10 6.5.1.4 • N2 N/A system is located in climate zone • C2 System employs water economizer Humidification(6.5.2.4) 1a,2a or 3a complying with 6.5.1.2,6.5.1.3 and • Cl System humidifies to a dew point< • N3 N/A system has no re-heating,re- 6.5.1.4 35F cooling or mixing of heated and cooled • N1 N/A size exception from Table 6.5.1A • C2 System humidifies and does not supply air or 6.5.18 have an economizer • N4 N/A system has>75%of the energy • N2 N/A non-particulate air treatment per • C3 System humidifies has a water-side for reheat from site recovered or site 6.2.1 of Standard 62.1 economizer solar energy sources • N3 N/A per exception c to 6.5.1 • N1 N/A system does not have a humidifier controls Exhaust air energy recovery(6.5.6.1) • N4 N/A system employs heat recovery • Cl System employs an exhaust air complying with 6.5.6.2 VAV Fan Control(6.5.3.2.1) energy recovery device that exceeds • N5 N/A system serves residential • Cl System has a variable speed drive 50%energy recover effectiveness spaces with a system capacity less than • C2 System has a vane-axial fan with • N1 N/A system is exempt per Table 5 times that in Table 6.5.1A variable pitch blades 6.5.6.1 • N6 N/A per exception f to 6.5.1 • C3 System uses a control that complies • N2 N/A system serves a laboratory • N7 N/A system expected to operate with 6.5.3.2.1 c. meeting 6.5.7.2 <20 hrs/wk • N1 N/A system is constant volume • N3 N/A system is heating only and the • N8 N/A system serves space with open • N2 N/A system serves a single zone and spaces are heated to<60F refrigerated casework systems complies with 6.4.3.10 • N4 N/A exhaust is toxic,flammable or • N9 N/A cooling efficiency exceeds the corrosive requirements of Table 6.3.2 VAV Fan Static Pressure Control(6.5.3.2.2 • N5 N/A system serves an area with N10 N/A serves computer rooms and and 6.5.3.2.3) • P commercial kitchen hoods meets exceptionto 6.5.1 • Cl Static pressure setpoint is<1/3 of P j N6 N/A>60%re of the heating energy is the fan design static • NI 1 N/A serves computer rooms and from site recovered or site solar energy •meets exception k to 6.5.1 C2 Static pressure setpoint is reset by • N7 N/A system meets exception f to zone demand per 6.5.3.2.3. Dehumidification(6.5.2.3) • N1 N/A system is constant volume 6.5.6.1 • Cl System dehumidifies without • N2 N/A system serves a single zone and • N8 N/A system meets exception g to employing reheating or recooling complies with 6.4.3.10 6.5.6.1 • N9 N/A system meets exception h to • N1 N/A system does not have Multiple Zone VAV System Ventilation 6.5.6.1 humidistatic controls Control(6.5.3.3) • N10 N/A system meets exception i to • N2 N/A system meets exception a to • Cl System complies with 6.5.3.3 6.5.6.1 6.5.2.3 • N1 N/A system is constant volume • N11 N/A system meets exception j to • N3 N/A system meets exception b to • N2 N/A system serves a single zone and 6.5.6.1 6.5.2.3 complies with 6.4.3.10 • N4 N/A system meets exception c to • N3 N/A system is does not have DDC to 6.5.2.3 the zone ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 . , HVAC Prescriptive Requirements Part III, Page 3 Option 1 -Nameplate Horsepower Installed Nameplate Horsepower Allowed Nameplate Horsepower a 3 Design Supply Airflow Rate(CFM5) 2250/5000/2500 > LL a a Fan Nameplate Horsepower Allowance from a Lco 3.375/7.5/3.75 2 r F Table 6.5.3.1.1A Tag Description cA CC w CD 0 z I Total Allowed Nameplate Horsepower 14.625 S-4 RTU-4 Supply Fan 0 0 0 0 0 2.28 S-5 RTU-5 Supply Fan O O 0 0 0 1.22 S-6 FCU-1,FCU-2 Fan 0 0 0 0 0 (2)1.5 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 I 6.5 Option 2-Brake Horsepower Allowed Fan Brake Horsepower Pressure Drop Adjustments for Qualifying Devices • Design Supply Airflow Rate(CFMs) Pressure Additional Drop from CFM Brake Fan Brake Horsepower Allowance from Table Table through Horsepower 6.5.3.1.1A Tag Device Description 6.5.3.1.1B Device Allowance Base Allowance(Line1 x Line 2) Additional Brake Horsepower Allowance Total Allowed Brake Horsepower I Installed Brake Horsepower a a)0 0 CL >, i 7 rn N d N O O-CL -• t CV CD t 2) O 2 8 Tag Description u) cc w <n O CFM Cl.C 11Fan 11Drive TlMotor CO` I O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 I ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 HVAC Mandatory Provisions Part II, Page 2 Project Name:Summit Orthopedics(Shell) Contact Person:John Gorman, P.E. Telephone:952-835-3810 Systems Worksheet(6.4) System Tag RTU-1 RTU-2 RTU-3 Supply CFM 40,500 33,400 6,700 DX Cooling Capacity 1200.6 MBH 1440.2 MBH 210.47 MBH Supply Motor HP (2)40 HP (2)30 HP 7.5 HP OA CFM(i.e.Outdoor Air CFM) 4,350 9,020 1,200 Deadband(6.4.3.1.2) Cl C1 C1 Automatic Shutdown(6.4.3.3.1) C1 Cl C1 Setback Controls(6.4.3.3.2) C1 C1 C1 Setup Controls(6.4.3.3.2) C1 C1 Cl Optimum Start(6.4.3.3.3) Cl C1 C1 Zone Isolation(6.4.3.3.4) Y Y Y OSA Shutoff Dampers(6.4.3.4.2) C1 C1 Cl Exhaust/Relief Shutoff Dampers(6.4.3.4.2) Cl Cl Cl Damper Leakage(6.4.3.4.3) C1 C1 C1 Heat Pump Aux Heat(6.4.3.5) N1 N1 N1 Humidifier Preheat(6.4.3.6) N1 N1 N1 Humidification/Dehumidification Deadband(6.4.3.7) Cl Cl C1 Ventilation Control for High Occupancy Areas(6.4.3.9) C1 C1 Cl Single Zone Fan Control(6.4.3.10) N3 N3 N3 Duct/Plenum Insulation(6.4.4.1.2) N1 N1 N1 Duct Sealing Levels(6.4.4.2.1)Supply/Return NA A/A NA Duct Leakage Test(6.4.4.2.2) N N N In the table above,enter the appropriate codes Optimum Start(6.4.3.3.3) Humidification/Dehumidification Dead Band from this list: • Cl Optimum start provided (6.4.3.7) Dead Band(6.4.3.1.2) •• Ni N/A continuous operation • Cl Complying controls provided Cl Duals.4.3.1.tpoint control • N2 N/A heatung and cooling-15 kbtu/h • Ni N/A no humidification and/or • C2 Manual change over control (4.4 kW)and manual on/off dehumidification • N1 N/A special occupancy(requires • N3 N/A supp/y<=10,000 cfm(4,7001/s) • Ventilation Control for High Occupancy Areas approval) OSA Shutoff Dampers(6.4.3.4.2 ) (6.4.3.9) • N2 N/A heating or cooling only • Cl Motorized shutoff dampers • Cl All zones comply with 6.4.3.9 • C2 Gravity shutoff dampers on OA and • N1 N/A exhaust air energy recovery Automatic Shutdown(6.4.3.3.1) building in climate zone 1,2 or 3 complies with 6.5.6.1 • Cl Complying 7-day timeclock with • N1 N/A OA<=300 cfm(142 l/s) • N2 N/A system is multiple zone and has override Exhaust/Relief Shutoff Dampers(6.4.3.4.2) pneumatic controls • C2 Complying Occupant sensor Cl• Motorized shutoff •dampers on exhaust • N3 N/A design OSA<1,200 cfm(570 I/s) • C3 Complying manually operated and relief • N4 N/A design OSA minus transfer(or timeswitch • C2 Gravity shutoff dampers on exhaust and make up air)<1,200 cfm(570 Us) • C4 Complying security system interlock relief and the building is less than three • C5 Complying residential system with 2- stories in height Single Zone Fan Control(6.4.3.10) day timeclock • Cl Complies with 6.4.3.10 • Ni N/A continuous operation Damper Leakage(6.4.3.4.3) • N1 N/A CHW unit with supply motor hp • N2 N/A heatung and cooling 515 kbtu/h Cl• OSA,exhaust and relief dampers <5hp(3.7 kW) (4.4 kW)and manual on/off comply with Table 6.4.3.4.3 • N2 N/A DX unit with cooling capacity Zone Isolation(6.4.3.3.4) <110 kBtu/h(32 kW) Setback Controls(6.4.3.3.2) • Cl Isolation areas provided • N3 N/A multiple Zone Unit • Cl Setback provided(down to 55F(13C) • N1 N/A continuous operation • N1 N/A continuous operation • N2 N/A 515 kBtu/h(4.4 kW)or 3/4 hp Duct/Plenum Insulation(6.4.4.1.2) • N2 N/A heatung and cooling 515 kbtu/h (0.56 kW) • Cl Complying insulation provided (4.4 kW)and manual on/off • N3 N/A all zones on same schedule • N1 N/A all ducts located in conditioned • N3 N/A not in climate zone 2 to 8 • N4 N/A OA/EA<=5,000 cfm(2,360 l/s) space • N4 N/A radiant heating • N5 N/A no heating Heat Pump Aux Heat(6.4.3.5) Duct Sealing(6.4.4.2.1) • Cl Complying controls provided • Enter highest seal level(A,B or C)for Setup Controls(6.4.3.3.2) • N1 N/A system is not a heat pump supply and return • Cl Setup provided(up to 90F(32C)) • N2 N/A auxiliary is not electric or is not Duct Leakage Test(6.4.4.2.2) • All N/A continuous operation provided • Y Ducts will be tested for leakage • N2 N/A heatung and cooling c15 kbtu/h • N3 N/A heat pump covered by NAECA • N Ducts will not be tested for leakage (4.4 kW)and manual on/off Humidifier Preheat(6.4.3.6) • N3 N/A not in climate zone lb,2b or 3b • Cl Complying controls provided • N4 N/A no cooling • Ni N/A no humidifier User's Manual for ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 Forms-3 sffE4_4_ HVAC Mandatory Provisions Part II, Page 1 Mandatory Equipment Efficiency Worksheet(6.4.1.1) Minimum Efficiency Size Category Sub-Category or Rating Units of Efficiency (Tables 6.8.1A through K) Equipment Type (Tables 6.8.1A Condition (Tables 6.8.1A System Tag (Tables 6.8.1A through K) through K) (Tables 6.8.1A through K) through K) Rated >_ Required RTU-1 Air conditioners,air cooled Greater than 760 MBH Split system and single pack EER/IEER 10.7/16.6 >_ 9.5/9.6 RTU-2 Air conditioners,air cooled Greater than 760 MBH Split system and single pack EER/IEER 10.2/17.4 >_ 9.6/9.6 RTU-3 Air conditioners,air cooled 135 MBH-240 MBH Split system and single pack EER/IEER 12.1/14.1 >_ 10.8/11.0 RTU-1,RTU-2 Warm-Air Furnace,Gas Greater than 225 MBH Maximum capacity Thermal efficiency 80% >_ 80% RTU-3 Warm-Air Furnace,Gas Less than 225 MBH Maximum capacity Thermal efficiency 80% >_ 80% Mandatory Non-Standard Centrifugal Chiller Worksheet(6.4.1.1) Table 6.8.1C Minimum Type and Efficiency&Adjusted Minimum Efficiency(Tables Leaving Leaving Factors for Adjusted Size Efficiency 6.8.1 H through J) Evaporator Condenser Efficiency from 6.4.1.2 Category Chiller Temperature Temperature (Table Path Table 6.8.1C Tag (°F) (°F) NB 6.8.1C) (A or B) Value/Adjusted value Rated >_ Required / / >_ / / >_ / / >_ / / > General Mandatory Requirements X Enclosed parking garage ventilation ID Independent perimeter heating All heating and cooling equipment systems meet the requirements of systems(if any)comply with the meet minimum efficiencies as required (6.4.3.4.5). control requirements of 6.4.3.1.1. in Tables 6.8.1 (A through K)(6.4.1). 0 Freeze protection or snow-melting U Independent heating and cooling Load calculations are provided for systems meet the requirements of thermostatic controls(if any)are selection of all equipment and systems 6.4.3.8 interlocked to prevent crossover of set 6.4.2.1 . points(6.4.3.2). ( ) U Piping insulation meets or exceeds the Pump head calculations are provided requirements of section 6.4.4.1.3. 0 Sensible heating panels are insulated per 6.4.4.1.3 for selection of all pumps(6.4.2.2). X Construction documents require Zone control complies with the record drawings(6.7.2.1),manuals U Radiant floor heating is insulated per (6.7.2.2),system balancing(6.7.2.3) 6.4.4.1.5 requirements of 6.4.3.1.1 and system commissioning(6.7.2.4). XStair and elevator shaft vents provided with motorized dampers(6.4.3.4.1) Special Mandatory Requirements XVentilation fans with motors greater U Freeze protection or snow/ice melting than 0.75 hp(1.0 kW)have automatic systems(if any)have controls to controls complying with Section prevent operation in warm weather 6.4.3.4.4. (6.4.3.8). ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 HVAC Prescriptive Requirements Part III, Page 1 IProject Name:Summit Orthopedics(Shell) Contact Person:John Gorman,P.E. Telephone:952-835-3810 Prescriptive Checklist Prescriptive Air-System Requirements ❑ Hydronic heat pump systems and water U Radiant heating systems comply with Allcooled AC units comply with the 6.5.8 systems comply with simultaneous requirements of 6.5.4.4. heating and cooling limitations U Heat recovery for service water (6.5.2). X Chilled and condenser water piping heating is provided for facilities that Prescriptive Hydronic System systems are sized in compliance with operate continuously,have a total Requirements 6.5.4.5 water-cooled heat rejection capacity exceeding 6,000,000 Btu/h(1,758 Prescriptive Special System Requirements X Hydronic systems meet the variable kW),and have a design service water 000 flow requirements of 6.5.4.1 U Heat rejection systems comply with heating(293 load kW).Theheihg heat recovery Y PY Btu/h recovery Chillers and boilers in parallel have section 6.5.5 system(if any)complies with 6.5.6.2. isolation controls per 6.5.4.2 U Kitchen exhaust systems comply with U The cooling equipment with hot-gas Chilled and hot water systems meet 6.5.7.1 bypass controls(if any)meets the the reset requirements unloading requirements of 6.5.9. temperature of 6.5.4.3 El Laboratory exhaust systems comply with 6.5.7.2 A,.,or *,T TT, Ar, Tr-,C C. , , fn n nn,,, 1111 HVAC Prescriptive Requirements Part III, Page 3 Option 1 —Nameplate Horsepower Installed Nameplate Horsepower Allowed Nameplate Horsepower a Design Supply Airflow Rate(CFMS) 40,500/33400/6700 o.Q Fan Nameplate Horsepower Allowance from a, 60.75/50.1 /10.05 Q $ a 47) B v2 Table 6.5.3.1.1A Tag Description in cc w Cr) z 0 z Total Allowed Nameplate Horsepower 120.9 S-1 RTU-1 Supply Fan O O 0 0 0 (2)29.5 S-2 RTU-2 Supply Fan 0 0 0 0 0 (2)24.16 S-3 RTU-3 Supply Fan 0 0 0 0 0 5.94 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 113.26 Option 2—Brake Horsepower Allowed Fan Brake Horsepower Pressure Drop Adjustments for Qualifying Devices Design Supply Airflow Rate(CFMS) Pressure Additional Drop from CFM Brake Fan Brake Horsepower Allowance from Table Table through Horsepower 6.5.3.1.1A Tag Device Description 6.5.3.1.1B Device Allowance Base Allowance(Line1 x Line 2) Additional Brake Horsepower Allowance Total Allowed Brake Horsepower Installed Brake Horsepower m iu U- v� o >, C fA z d Q • to 2 o Zi5 Tag Description co Q w cn 0 CFM a o 71Fanry� Drive •�Motor m I O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 I ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 Building Envelope Compliance Documentation Part I, Page 1 Project Name:Summit Orthopedics Project Address:2620 Eagan Woods Drive Date:3-1-2016 Designer of Record:Welsh Architecture Email: Telephone: Contact Person:Lynn D.Sloat AIA Email:Isloat@welshco.com Telephone:952-897-7870 City:Minnetonka Climate Zone:6 A,B Criteria Table:5.5-6 Mandatory Provisions Checklist Insulation(5.4.1) Insulation Materials are installed in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations and in such a manner as to achieve rated R-value of insulation f? Exception:for metal building roofs or metal building walls. ❑ Loose-fill insulation is not used in attic roof spaces when the slope of the ceiling is more than three in twelve. ❑ Attic eave vents have baffling to deflect the incoming air above the surface of the insulation. 0 Insulation is installed in a permanent manner in substantial contact with the inside surface. ❑ Batt insulation installed in floor cavities is supported in a permanent manner by supports no greater than 24 in.o.c. O Lighting fixtures,HVAC,and other equipment are not be recessed in ceilings in such a manner to affect the insulation thickness unless. Exceptions: t 0 The recessed area is less than 1%. The entire roof,wall,or floor is covered with insulation to the full depth required. 0 The effects of reduced insulation are included in calculations using an area weighted averages. El Roof insulation is not installed over suspended ceiling with removable ceiling panels. • Exterior insulation is covered with a protective material to prevent damage. Insulation is protected in attics and mechanical rooms where access is needed. ❑ Foundation vents do not interfere with the insulation. • Insulation materials in ground contact have a water absorption rate no greater than 0.3%. Fenestration and Doors(5.4.2) 1W U-factors are determined in accordance with NFRC 100.U-factors for skylights shall be determined for a slope of 201=labove the horizontal. Exceptions: U-factors are taken from A.8.1 for skylights. U-factors are taken from A.8.2 other fenestration products. U-factors are taken from A.7 for opaque doors. U-factors are derived from DASMA 105 for garage doors. ❑ Solar heat gain coefficient(SHGC)is determined in accordance with NFRC 200. Exceptions: SHGC is determined by multiplying the shading coefficient(SC)by 0.86.Shading coefficient is determined using a spectral data file determined in accordance with NFRC 300. SHGC for the center of glass is used.SHGC is determined using a spectral data file determined in accordance with NFRC 300. SHGC is taken from Section A8.1 for skylights. SHGC is taken from Section A8.2 for vertical fenestration. ❑ Visible light transmittance is determined in accordance with NFRC 200. ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 Building Envelope Compliance Documentation Part I, Page 2 Air Leakage(5.4.3) The building envelope has a continuous air barrier meeting the requirements of 5.4.3.1. Air leakage through fenestration and doors meets the requirements of 5.4.3.2. Exceptions: f? Field fabricated fenestration and doors. r? Metal coiling doors in semiheated spaces in climate zones 1 through 6. 2ICargo doors and loading dock doors are equipped with weatherseals in climates zones 4 through 8(5.4.3.3). 3E1 Entrance doors have vestibules(5.4.3.4). Exceptions: t? Building has revolving doors r? Doors not intended as building entrance t? Doors open from dwelling unit(s) 0 Climate zone 1 or 2 Building in climate zone 3 less than four stories and smaller than 10,000 ft2(930 m2) 0 Buildings entrances in buildings less than 1,000 ft2(90 m2)in climate zones 4,5,6,7,and 8 f? Doors opening from spaces smaller than 3,000 ft2(280 m2)that is separate from a building entrance ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 Building Envelope Compliance Documentation Part II, Page 1 Project Name:Summit Orthopedics Contact Person:Lynn D.Sloat AIA Email:Isloat@welshco.com Telephone:952-897-7870 Space Category 5.5.4.4.1 Exceptions Window-Wall Ratio Skylight-Roof Ratio Nonresidential ❑ Permanent Projections Gross Wall Area(ft2 or m2): 23,049 Gross Roof Area(ft2): 23,837 Window Area(ft2 or m2): 8,865 Skylight Area: NA ❑ Residential Street Level Windows — Window-Wall Ratio: .38 Skylight-Roof Ratio ❑ Semiheated South Fenestration Area(ft2) 4,110 Space require minimum skylight area? East Fenestration Area(ft2) 6,507 West Fenestration Area(ft2) 6,024 Opaque Surfaces Class(Pick one) $,! e sa Pick, Pick ®1Wall Floor ',Slab Door ,on rr one Description/ 4 Proposed Criteria Surface `m m Name v L 4' Insulation Insulation Area a O; ' 0 o o ; R-Value, R-Value, (ft2 or m2) a) U-Factor, U-Factor, (optional) -2 Fig ami 0 0) .. p 4 <45... a E E y; m Q ¢ co C-Factor or C-Factor or 3 c� w LL ,' D x -1 F-Factor F-Factor • m c m u- LL ( S , 11, 0 3 m v *a „.2. 3 3 u) ',..1. g U)• D 2 Cl) 24.,„ ¢ U Poured Concrete Wall Q,0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0® R-7.5 R-7.5 00000004'000C).000 00 00 Brick Face w/Stud Back-up 004414‘0040 1 O�• 0000000 �'. .;0® i 13+7.5 ci 13+7.5ci 0 000 '000 000 t, 00 0' 00 �f. Brick Face w/CMU Back-up 900®000• 0000 00 !00® R-15.0 R-13.3 00000000Q00 00 00 rig Fully Adhered 60 mil EPDM ®0:` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 obo 00 C�®' R-21.82 R-20 } 0 .. O ® 0000 00000'00 00'00 q..: t r. Concrete Floor Slab *fi, 00000000e, 0 0 .'0® NR r. 000,0000 $ 000 00 00f00' Concrete Plank Floor w/2topping 000000 '000411000 06 •. R-7.0 R-4.2ci �00000000000 O0 00 00 Hollow Metal Doors/Frames 0000000 00 0 0 0 ®0 0 ®Oit U-0.0653 U-0.50 C3f0000 0000o00 O ooi Sectional Garage Doors004'000000000,0. ' y 0® ®O kt U-0.067 U-0.50 x a„ i,..:wsy O 00000 0000000 a o oora uO0000 000 00 O #00 00000000000ct00 0000;IN OC pOO000O0000OO- 00 1611 960 0 00000 0 OP,G1 0 0 ,,a%,..,.„ „..,,,,,s00 =W OOOOOOOQ0OOt*000 0 ` 00 . 0. 000ObOOOdbOO 400 . COOOOOOOOO�OOOO 00 ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 Building Envelope Compliance Documentation Part II, Page 2 Project Name:Summit Orthopedics Contact Person:Lynn D.Sloat AIA Email:Isloat@welshco.com Telephone:952-897-7870 Fenestration Frame Class(Pick one) Proposed Fenestration Criteria Description/ Name — .43 t -(7) C) a_ ja2) 8 a o 0 -al-I --1" 7a. '2 - -Ei d 0) 0 0 u) c u) 0(I) LL_ 2 c'La" '2 r2 45' 6 2 < tp) C V) • ° E — . 5 _tr T,2. 2)'2 C 2 2 -,S .2 8 E — — — c o P) 0 — r, Ca,CD •„(12 a) LLco a) o 00 -T -05 0 > C > 0 00 z 2 2 (r) Z < < 0 0_ 0 < 0 (0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2010 esi engineering March 10, 2016 Mr. Lynn Sloat Welsh Companies 4350 Baker Rd. #400 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Subject: Summary Report Evaluation of Building Exterior Noise Reduction Summit Orthopedics – Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr. Sloat: This report summarizes our findings and recommendations related to building exterior noise reduction for Summit Orthopedics Medical Office Building project in Eagan, Minnesota. We understand the City of Eagan code requires the building to meet certain noise reduction levels based on the "Aircraft Noise Zone" established in the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. The noise reduction requirements apply to the roof, walls, windows and doors, as well as the mechanical systems that could allow noise to propagate to the interior. One way to demonstrate the design meets the City requirements is to assure the "plans and specifications adequately document the use of construction assemblies that meet or exceed the STC ratings required." ESI Engineering has been asked to evaluate the building design to determine if the code STC requirements are being met and provide recommendations to meet requirements if necessary. The following is a review of the "City Submittal Comments" drawing set dated November 4, 2015. Comments pertaining to assessment of the drawings are in bold. Regulations To determine the STC ratings required, several documents were reviewed. The following lists the steps and logic used to determine the ratings and other requirements. 1. Regulations that effect this project include the following: a. City of Eagan Code; Sec. 11.64. - ANZ—Aircraft Noise Zone Overlay District. b. Metropolitan Council 2030 Transportation Policy Plan, Appendix M: Aviation Land Use Compatibility Guidelines. Adopted November, 2010. c. Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan, Appendix L: Aviation Land Use Compatibility Guidelines. Adopted January 14, 2015. d. Metropolitan Council Builder's Guide: Mitigating Aircraft Noise in New Residential Construction. Dated March 2006. Structures J Vibration Noise I Monitoring ESI Engineering Inc. 7831 Glenroy Road Suite 430, Minneapolis, MN 55439 952.531.4646 I esi-engineering.com Mr. Lynn Sloat March 10, 2016 Welsh Companies Page 2 2. The project site is located at the southwest corner of I-494 and Pilot Knob Road in Eagan, MN. According to Figure L-1 in the Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (2040 Plan), the site is located on the 65 DNL (Day-Night Sound Level) contour for the Minneapolis — Saint Paul International Airport (MSP). Figures 1 and 2 show the project site location. Y ...4 a t7s.,' 'Ig i T 5 yteti.r. +or kilk , 1,` 7 . :- 1.Utile ,ill .•:• "• "I, f. ,,i;ii� tit I).Pnrk.i • '4^ *•'`4. .i..f , tsydole et, ibi. milt 41,,'' , r/• r Kii m tfOvr 'lie �� Qk 'II 4 IAN Sa rh • r r ,yE „s,; 7,. aY r3E., teP 1., . ,0♦ .� ''t1y ze`` w,,,..MesMora .r �. ao K ,,,, ,„•.- "'I .1 11, >t r ra ,f K Ill illt ,yh' vM�Y • eid 1 ■� J'! j •IL Lake . It ' 'K s KR {Ka�wM�� 4. 1 NI Ew...., M t a s 4 s 75 DNL i •{/{!/� I l. 1 "k a.w.rwwyow.aaa �'�1 1t.a.•' • i Jk » ■ w..wv.w .i", K c r i a y 7O DNL.J " �r k : - -.Y--V 34.. E t• fix, 74 n {�. fir- �tmer t w.wwwa on.c......w ,.► . '1 Y '+ r.. •4, . rs.. . .. `.E G�wc { f us DNL =' 4prr 7r[own Project Site a' . ...n.t MwatM Mqu•xia 110, I. M • x1 in yaw Ow c wades --, Y 6 ! 411. ': t� „` , 4 t": Ea..M r,tl ynwry nnI t" Y= ( 'S ir,:i f )11,11' ' M1 " Ear.. tngrm . :. "'711���"'"' IN c oo...o.u>AVOW,* :. .,.. <a� �` # - 4. ♦ fa:". - di I il 60 DNL + w Il .4.,.9...r ..�K:. , rx .: r .-. w0IP> r },... ..- 1 • tee merit itV w.w i Minneapolis - St Paul InternationalAirport t M 5 P i 0 Figure 1. MSP noise contours map showing project site location. i' „.\\ i d6'i,s4 5r.. , .... iSaiae V ..� y: . Project Site /' .� ,,.. tto:.,uile 3 J ends www 'A.,,,,......... .e rwili-4-nz--7.-7t, , liror-.00—„ ,77.---,,:,; II, )15.r.7 .04100.4.--,, . ;,. „00.25,Ar:zo...tii,,,,10 , ,i _ ; . ' {” ,f`4 t str n t �,ta f` LVlRr.w.. F1�Jit 4 , 40 t lifit- ifil r�� MSP Airpo Zoinmg + a •-,:r;:‘,-,.., .� �kfi ,r•., ;{w' a RewtE'C•vtiyo `"" #snam Hums 47,11 '3 x i,,,Diu tii 2 �a• Y � 11 "'+Ke+ , IIII gilt +Tlr�I"n. s. ''' !u. F , Y r''.�'t�a � nPi� ,.,�iiaan i �k r.,,a ' V ;nr ��I{StIttIEIII1Ei1. rJ 3 ,, r fi Sa s+t `!�Itk�4,�iuin� fit ab til-Ultt4tlt .,,,AX;.r ',,47,:. ' �r bairaia'ta'ba� Ems. : ,,��>( � �o/ - a.• �.. xra": u,': "':'pi)Cli4`4 SZ,;` Zi fial�r:tit .T- x- p,In a Co ys Argil-AVM: 1 d f 41, s'' �iicti4k�i ilty. t_;' til - a Cr, .Ry. 4'�" t:. wOuiakxax�ws `y V k r*a r r' "c riuEtiHit �4�����`r ,�Ml;HwiK" % 1�111►rKi ,� � r s �s.. i {. i,fir +so,•s.,�i.,►.r' ail�t #i {tom `N�flkE.it r-" ,� ,( '• "fie a`n.'�a+i r'9� �i ,'� 1!1/P _�t10 itrM rP2,7601_•...„ .r'w.r � �.; f /..�n- '�� i K."c a"rLfi++'�187e�iA ...a{ 'tNr •` .��,,"` C x��!►`O\\NW Y'�t`xY "".a•_ 4 J*0t4444'. AP '' rt., F S y. }yes j /y � 'yi .IM-�a �,.• ���r���l`�r '�,.fi V��i'pro '4 k?Li ; `�.'��7 ,��7 G. II �i1x.a � y/ y��.w��/+� y� .+ t..-. a i,Ailtir •aas i as h ie t i ""OSx axp'o su e'�n -- r Figure 2. City of Eagan zoning map showing noise contours at the project site. Mr. Lynn Sloat March 10, 2016 Welsh Companies Page 3 3. The City of Eagan Code, "Sec. 11.64. - ANZ—Aircraft Noise Zone Overlay District", has requirements for land uses affected by aircraft noise. "Subd. 6. Establishment of aircraft noise zones", states that land in a DNL 69-65 zone is an aircraft noise zone 3. The 2040 Plan defines zone 3 as "Noise impacts can be categorized as sustaining. Noise levels are in the 65-69 DNL range. In addition to the intensity of the noise, location of buildings receiving the noise must also be fully considered. Aircraft and runway use operational changes can provide some relief for certain uses in this area." 4. In Table 1 of this the Eagan code section, Other Medical, Health and Education categories in aircraft noise zone 3 have a "Provisional" land use compatibility. The Code defines provisional use as, "A use that is not permitted, unless it meets the structural performance standards to be acceptable according to MS473.192 (metropolitan area Aircraft Noise Attenuation Act)." Structures built after December 1983 shall be acoustically constructed so as to achieve the interior sound levels described in the Structural Performance Standards, Table L-5 of the Metropolitan Council 2030 Transportation Plan, Appendix L--Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Aircraft Noise." While the code references the 2030 Plan, the 2040 Plan is actually the correct reference and is used in this evaluation. 5. According to the 2040 Plan, the project development type is an "Infill Development", which is defined as the following: "pertains to an undeveloped parcel or parcels of land proposed for development, similar to or less noise-sensitive than the developed parcels surrounding it. 6. Table L-3 of the 2040 Plan provides land use compatibility guidelines for aircraft noise. According to the table, the "Services: Other Medical, Health & Educational Services" categories for infill development projects within a noise exposure zone of 69-65 DNL are considered a "Provisional" compatibility. 7. The 2040 Plan defines a provisional compatible land use as, "uses that should be discouraged if at all feasible; if allowed, must meet certain structural performance standards to be acceptable according to MS473.192 (Metropolitan Area Aircraft Noise Attenuation Act). Structures built after December 1983 shall be acoustically constructed so as to achieve the interior sound levels described in Table L-4. Each local governmental unit having land within the airport noise zones is responsible for implementing and enforcing the structure performance standards in its jurisdiction." 8. Table L-4 of the 2040 Plan states that aircraft sound level inside Services structures should not exceed 50 dBA. 9. Table 2 in the Eagan Code section 11.64 states that Other Medical, Health and Education buildings in aircraft noise zone 3 need to provide at least 24 dBA of noise reduction for compatibility. Mr. Lynn Sloat March 10, 2016 Welsh Companies Page 4 10.Table 5 of this code section states that to achieve a noise level reduction of 25 dBA, the following STC ratings for building elements is required (the Table 5 footnote says the rating is actually 2 STC points less than the table values): a. Roof/Ceiling STC 43 b. Walls STC 43 c. Windows STC 33 d. Doors STC 23 These requirements match the ordinance recommendations in Appendix C of the Metropolitan Council Builders Guide. 11.Along with the Table 5 STC requirements listed above, the City of Eagan Code Sec. 11.64.8.6.1.a. also requires the plans and specifications demonstrate compliance with the following to assure the elimination of sound leaks: a. All mechanical ventilation systems shall be installed that will provide the minimum air circulation and fresh air supply requirements as provided in the State and International Building Code for the proposed occupancy without the need to open any exterior doors or windows. b. The perimeter of all exterior windows and door frames shall be sealed airtight to the exterior wall construction. c. Fireplaces shall be equipped with well fitted chimney closing devices. d. All ventilation ducts, except range hoods, connecting interior space to outdoors shall be provided with a bend such that no direct line of sight exists from the exterior to the interior through the vent duct. e. Doors and windows shall be constructed so that they are close fitting. Weather stripping seals shall be incorporated to eliminate all edge gaps. f. All penetrations through exterior walls by pipes, ducts, conduits and the like shall be caulked airtight to the exterior construction. Building Element STC Review The Summit Orthopedics building elements must meet the STC requirements listed in point 10 above. The following is a review of the STC ratings for each element: 1. The roof must have a minimum rating of STC 43. The building has two different roof constructions: a. A built up roof construction consisting of a standard 1 1/2" metal deck, 1 1/2" polyiso, 3 1/2" minimum rigid insulation, singly ply roofing, as shown in Figure 2. Level 3 spaces below have either an ACT ceiling or a gypsum board ceiling. With the ACT below, the roof/ ceiling assembly has a rating of STC 46', and with a gypsum ceiling below the roof the rating will be higher than STC 46. Both ceiling assemblies meet the STC 43 requirement. 1STC laboratory test number TLF-99-01 1a by National Research Council Canada. Mr. Lynn Sloat March 10, 2016 Welsh Companies Page 5 1YPICAL. OC4°CONSTRUCTION 60 MIL FULLY ADHERED SINGLE PLY S-1122'EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION(R-3D5/IN) 1-U2""POLYISC CY.. URATE(IR-5.56/IN) GRID 6 MIL POLY VAPOR FARRIER•TAPE SCAMS �✓ 14/2"METAL PECK 4 STEEL LOST FRAMING TO STEEL.FRAMING _ 4131 \\\ZIMHO OMR WNW 111111•11,I e046.0 1t2T a T0 A 1'Ymiummio -F5L PARAPET STIP 0 ' 0 I I VOID'SwJINSI*.. 1 d I T.0-DECKING 1M:.. +_ t'2.1.!! =y ==`rY�Y� i=ru= . VARIES-SEE ROS PLAN I � EL 144'-5-314"-MGR POIhlI ra Acoustical Ceiling 112° Figure 2.Typical built-up roof type detail. b. Within the screened mechanical area towards the center of the building, the roof construction is similar to Figure 2 except it has a concrete slab on the metal deck. The concrete deck alone is STC 50 and it will be higher with the ACT or gypsum ceiling below. Therefore this assembly meets the STC 43 requirement. 2. Exterior walls must have a minimum rating of STC 43. The exterior wall is 4" face brick with a 2" airspace, 1 1/2" rigid insulation, 1/2" ext. sheathing, 6" metal studs with 3 1/2" spray insulation and 5/8" gyp bd as shown in Figure 3. This assembly has an estimated rating of STC 50,which meets the STC 43 requirement. ■ ■ ■ ■ TD,co .NCSLAB-3rd FLOOR EL.126-O" to inn 5�n�= to ■ TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL ot 4"FACE BRICK ■ 2"AIRSPACE 1-112"RIGID INSUL.(R-7.5) 13I SPRAY APPLIED MOISTURE/AIR BARRIER ■ 1/2"EXT.SHEATHING DENSGLASS GOLD bI 6""GALV.STEEL STUDS,16 GA 16°O.C. �'I 3-1/2"CLOSED CELL SPRAY INSUL.-R-13.0 6 MIL.POLY V.B. 5/8"GYPSUM BOARD Figure 3.Typical exterior wall section. Mr. Lynn Sloat March 10, 2016 Welsh Companies Page 6 3. Windows must have a minimum rating of STC 33. The project has both aluminum curtain wall and aluminum window framing. I understand the EFCO Series 5900 curtain wall system with a 1" thick insulated glazing unit (1/4" glass, 1/2" air space, 1/4" glass) is being considered. Test reports for this window indicate the rating is STC 30, which does not meet the requirement. Based on review of test reports for similar glass and window systems, replacing one of the glass layers with 5/16" thick glass, or with laminated glass, would raise the rating sufficiently to meet the STC 33 requirement. The following summarizes the test results: Series 5900 with 1" IG (1/4 _ 1/2 - 1/4): STC 30 - ATI Test No. 01-41618.01A Standard 1" IG (1/4 _ 1/2 _ 1/4N: STC 35 - Test No. RAL-TL85-215 Special 1-1/16" IG (1/4 _ 1/2 - 5/16): STC 40 - Viracon literature Special 1" Lam IG (1/4 lam - 1/2 - 5/16): STC 39 -Test No. RAL-TL85-235 Since the STC rating of the 1-1/16" IG and 1" Lam IG glass is 4 to 5 points higher than the standard 1" IG, we expect the rating of the 5900 series window would increase similarly if replaced with one of these options. To meet the STC 33 requirement, we recommend the standard IG in the 5900 window system be either the 1-1/16" IG (1/4 - 1/2 -5/16)or the laminated 1" IG (1/4 lam -1/2 -1/4). 4. Doors must have a minimum rating of STC 23. Exterior door types will be insulated metal doors or full glass aluminum double and single doors. All exterior doors will be tight fitting and have weather stripping seals to improve thermal energy conservation and improve sound isolation. a. Hollow metal doors with weather stripping have a rating of STC 282, which meets the design goal of STC 23. b. The basis of design is the YKK AP Model 35XT glass door which is reported by the manufacturer to be STC 33,which meets the STC 23 requirement. Sound Leak Prevention As listed in point 11 of the regulations discussion above, the Eagan Code requires the plans and specifications demonstrate compliance with the following to assure the elimination of sound leaks: The following are our comments related to sound leaks through mechanical and other paths. 1. The building HVAC will be designed to provide the minimum air circulation and fresh air supply requirements as provided in the State and International Building Code for the proposed occupancy without the need to open any exterior doors or windows. 2. The perimeter of all exterior windows and door frames will be caulked to create an airtight seal to the exterior wall construction. 2STC laboratory test result by the National Research Council Canada. Listed in Noise Control in Buildings by Cyril M. Harris, 1994. Mr. Lynn Sloat March 10, 2016 Welsh Companies Page 7 3. The building does not have any fireplaces or chimneys, so this noise transmission path is not an issue. 4. All ventilation duct connecting interior space to the outdoors will be have at least one bend, which prevents direct line of sight from the exterior to the interior. ESI will review the final mechanical drawings to verify this requirement is being met. 5. Doors and windows will be constructed so that they are close fitting and sealed caulked at the frame perimeter. Doors and operable windows will have weather stripping seals to eliminate all edge gaps. 6. All penetrations through exterior walls by pipes, ducts, conduits and the like will be caulked to create an airtight seal to the exterior wall construction. Conclusions The City of Eagan and Metropolitan Council require new construction located within noise exposure zones to meet certain STC requirements for outdoor to indoor noise reduction. Based on our review of the drawings provided, the new Summit Orthopedics medical office building meets these requirements. No modifications to the current design are required. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project and remain available to assist in the resolution of these and any other matters. Please let us know if you have questions or need more information. Sincerely, 4., ej. ,c Anthony J. B.xter, P.E. Principal File:T:\Projects\P2183 Welsh-Summit Orthopedics Airport Noise Control\Reports-Out\2183 Summit Orthopedic- Airport Noise Control Letter March 10, 2016 ver 1 .docx Mike Lence From: Mike Lence Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:56 PM To: 'eric.kobeska@rjmconstruction.com' Cc: 'Isloat@wellshco.com'; Craig Novaczyk Subject: Summit Orthopedics submittals Eric, We have started our review process and are requesting the following items be submitted for review. /Y. 1 Met Council SAC determination letter. �'. 1 Special Structural Testing& Inspection Program Summary Schedule with signatures of respective agencies. ,,,3? A completed Energy Compliance form from the cityofeagan.com website for the building envelope. 1 Emergency Response Site Plan,examples available on the City of Eagan website. ,8'. Plans and specifications of this project shall be certified by a Recognized Acoustical Specialist showing compliance with the City of Eagan's ordinance for airport noise mitigation. AS. Consult with Fire Marshal Darrin Bramwell 651-675-5905 regarding fire suppression.We will need Darrin's approval to issue the building permit. Contact me if you have any questions, Sincerely, Mike Mike Lence I Senior Building Inspector I City of Eagan410111' f City Hall I 3830 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan,MN 55122 I(651)675-5676 I(651)675-5694(Fax)I mlencel cityofeagan.com 'J jt E go THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error,please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. 1 �/� a K e , ,, ,, ., .,L. -IT rlII „,, w-. , I � , in, .,„: 6- I0 . .... ii. 1t , ,� 73 - : , _,.., .._-J --- \'‘ '• . Nil', ' , -____ [I 'i '-.7.. :''O v — . . „ N I .'' i'll `�� • I ...'. ■■ & , , 1 , , Nj 0 . ... I— Er ll'' ''' '' m , x., I> i tea: G) 1 'L ;— M1 Ii € Z ~ d ,1 '' I 73 ll 941.ftl '' N■ � I . Z I ��� 01.9 In Ilipa • ■•1 I” D 41) 1� - > 67.0111111111. M _ Z ( .. iii 16'.it..". I i ;, gimp II O " N - _ Z N ' 0 '' ''' ' 0 I n r T m 0 rrl ` Irn0 � � O � u q? m > / ,4' _._ . > ..... Z m �Cn II ��,. I rn � Z GAN o= I z0 r XO xi m ..4, Pi � Z �. = C7 m 00 © -` 0 > l' / - , 0 - (/), 1 Zt,,7,, -.‘ , 44404 G> Z• Z ,,, .I*/ , -m c ) 0 m Cf.) . > ' '-',, '''' \ 0 --` . -# - 4' '' r-i (11z m - 70 CD0 xi � l 0 X D z 03 m 3 , . / P -i b p m Z © © © © 0n Special Structural Testing and Inspection Prog~ra m Surttmar,`r, ;chedulc Project Name:, Summit Orthopedics _ Project Number: Location: Eagan.Minnesota Permit Number: (1) Technical(2) Type of Report Frequency Description(3) Assigned Firm(6) Section Article Inspector(4) (5) 1704 .3.1 Structural Welding SI-S Per Inspection 1704 .3.2 Structural Details SI-S Per inspection 17043.3 High Strength Bolting SI-S Per Inspection 1704 .4 Concrete and Reinforcing SI-S Per Inspection 1704 .4 Bolts in Concrete SI-S Per Inspection 170411E111 Masonry SLS Per Inspection Testing Schedule Concrete TA Per Inspection Soil TA Per Inspection Notes: This schedule shall be filled out and included in the Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program. (I) Permit Number shall be provided by the Building Official. (2) Referenced to the specific technical scope section in the IBC. (3) Use descriptions per IBC Chapter 17,as adopted by the Minnesota State Building Code. (4) SI-S=Special Inspector-Structural,TA=Testing Agent, SI-A=Special Inspector-Architectural, 1'A =Testing Agent. (5) Weekly,monthly,per test/inspection,per floor,etc. (6) Firm contracted to perform services. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Each appropriate representative shall sign below: rs , j f Owner: -•* Firm• t C1Gi1 W 60415 T, L(.0 Date: l! 17/lOI t:c iitracto Firm: gT G p:+s c'T7 Do Date. 2. 17Z //0 Arcllitect�,t''*r* . . Firm:.���"(r' '. N '! rr Date �( SFR •.;. � „ _► , - - Firm: ISS Date: 2/15/16 SI-S: t)' ,,,,,,44-_:t' r Firm: "1 ;.7 Date: 3.3-x 4 .v.. TA: ,.1 ;/ ,,}',/ Firm: j-,,! r % Date: 3- 3-1(0, If requested by engineer/architect of record or building official, the individual names of all prospective special inspectors and the work they intend to observe shall be identified. Legend: SER=Structural Engineer of Record TA-Testing Agency SI-S=Special Inspector-Structural Accepted for the Building Department By: Date: \ N \ IA<.. \ '''''', ..., td,,- f...1 0 0 0 0 0 / ,,, \ -> = \\ F-- ----„. MI / , -0 1 \ „ . „. >- L., N.,,,,,,,,k. \ - ..,„., 1 _. _. z= z RI IS IAI I - E-3 / -77.4: \\ al C3',,,'\'' '-\''''''':'", LL =Ce w z = c 0 = z / 0 6 E u) < u) z ' - \ 0 < \ --,, ii. (//n 0 CD ci_ z 0 0 7 / -A I I:cE iii 1-1/1 -.> L.L.I u) 47 w 0 # . . , \\ \ • 1 c S ti. -* J 2 1- ) IL 8 0 ici- < w <4 o , / --r.,- , ce z , (-9___ 0 (1) 0 8 I— Lu Z ..i.c —I 4 _,.: \ 41.,,,s. ,, • : 1? wz g 0 ° .71 0 0 CL • ',. i la I— (f.) fri Illr • 1 ... \ • _II co LJ.1 Ly Ce 000 ,,,,,,, / z I__ . , - 1E 0 a x Ed fa LTI III I . ro 2 ct ui --, 0 cn >- o_ .--- / 0 cl '''' / It-- 1151-----, 00 owl 0, cn 0 octn '‘.-- LIJ ,< 1„w t.c, 2 ce i: ,-1 o / N ...... .. 1 -,.. co IT 1 ,-1 , `1-.1 ..... cv ,ir •_„,,_...____.,,,..=... -___-_ III 4, I 1 ii r . I MI 141 ii --- r I / 1 N.. L., . z 2 1 0 7 111 ..,41...- --- 1 mpg NINO i Mb ',.ii lip Nitta wr' ill',14,.. '--- -, I 1 .41111r"4 - ill r, < w 1 z --- < v " AM /, Ilitlkii\\III' il!' ( , /411111 , 4 • 0 i, k ,,,,„, 1 Qi 2 0 EN --•,, ,mor Wig ur --4,...AN .APIPFA) NE I, o' a II o 1 1 s //z ,,;1 Ii= 6 o II EN l'i...; 1 I ,:ill P' I I 11 ' ci I ' I Nil 0 0 9 zki 0 ill 04 tk. It " I LO RN KM .. 1 I N; 0 a tfl IN— -11111 t II l I 1 1 V -i 11 I ' P 1 1 1 y, : II i w(..0) CL 0 1 ; • 1 i 1 I I,I,V • r i • • CC 17- __, • 1 0 1 / I— /GP /411111111,,IL, ,• ,Is.7.,Imeni-, ,, I I , I I/ i I ..,.,„ , , „.• _ 1 1 1 IA _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ IN,L, 1 1 / RV RAP ( , * 77 ,,,,TiTy i ,- '..4*'+ -5----77ii __„/ 1 i 19 D Mike Lence From: Julie Strid Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 2:50 PM To: Mike Lence Subject: FW: Summit- Storm Water Maint Agt. Attachments: Stormwater Management System Agmnt - Eagan Woods J0277 (RBB).pdf Hi Mike, Please see highlighted part of the email below. Thank you, Julie Strid Julie Strid I Planning Aide I City of Eagan4400. City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan,MN 55122 1651-675-5686 1651-675-5694(Fax)I jstrid o(�citvofeagan.com My of 1 ail THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient.If you received this in error,please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Gregg Thompson Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 2:21 PM To: Julie Strid Cc: Aaron Nelson Subject: RE: Summit - Storm Water Maint Agt. Julie, Attached is the Maintenance Agreement (pdf). The Exhibits file size is big (around 60mb), so I put it on the I-drive here: I:\Community Development\Application Submittals\Summit Orthopedics. Can you print from this Exhibits file? We need the Owner's signature on page 5 (and notarized on page 6)of the Agreement. Once the Owner has signed, we consider the condition met(we can record this, not the Owner). Then the agreement can be sent to the Mayor/Clerk for signature. Please let me know when the Owner has signed 2 single-sided copies of the Agreement. Also,...rega(ding collecting a fee 'a "Stormwvater Management System=Performance Security" (Fiinn ncial lalrantee) 'Should be collected for this application with the B it It g;Permit. The fie is$35,000(based on 1tj quare feet of disturbed area,as noted n plan seeet) f"his rad l from the table in t e X016 Fee S hedule (page 6) untierStorr MPer anagement System formnc aSecurity.*The Account Code listed for this item p the e#Schedule is 9001.2245. Sound ok? Thank you! Gregg Gregg Thompson I Water Resources Specialist I City of Eagan 4411111' Maintenance Facility 13501 Coachman Point I Eagan, MN 55122 {; 651-675-5335 1651-675-5360(Fax)I GThonnpson(@,cityofeaqan.com of Eaaali From: Julie Strid Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 10:21 AM To: Gregg Thompson Cc: Aaron Nelson Subject: RE: Summit - Storm Water Maint Agt. Good morning, Haven't heard anything from you on this?We are almost ready to release the building permit but the recording of this and the PD agreement is on hold until I receive the agreement. Please let me know asap. Thank you, Julie Strid Julie Strid I Planning Aide I City of Eagan (4011. City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan,MN 55122 1651-675-5686 1651-675-5694(Fax)I istrid(a�citvofeagan.com My of 19pll THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended( recipient.If you received this in error,please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. `j Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Julie Strid Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 3:17 PM To: Gregg Thompson Cc: Aaron Nelson Subject: RE: Summit- Storm Water Maint Agt. Hi Gregg, I would prefer to have the document all ready with exhibits. I don't want to have to guess to make sure I have the correct documents. I will arrange for signatures and collect the money once I have the completed document in my hand. Thank you, 2 Julie Strid Julie Strid I Planning Aide I City of Eagan City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan,MN 55122 1651-675-5686 1651-675-5694(Fax)I jstridCa.citvofeagan.com [ ofE € l THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended f jj recipient.If you received this in error,please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. b,-A Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Gregg Thompson Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 4:30 PM To: Julie Strid Cc: Aaron Nelson Subject: RE: Summit- Storm Water Maint Agt. The Main Body of the Agreement (pages 1-6) has been prepared by the City Attorney and is ready(attached), however, we are waiting on some of potentially up to 5 revised Exhibits (of the 10 total Exhibits to be included with the Agreement) from the Owner's Engineer. So we have two options: 1) If the Maintenance Agreement can't be signed by the Owner until all the Exhibits(e.g. specific plan sheets)are updated with recent comments,then we have to wait until the Owner's Engineer provides these revised plan sheets to us to include within the Exhibit package, before the Owner can sign. The Exhibit revisions are minor, but these revised plan sheets need to be included with the Exhibit package with the Agreement when it is officially recorded at Dakota County. 2) If it would be ok with the Owner to sign the Maintenance Agreement, with the understanding that 5 of the Exhibit sheets are pending until final updates are received from the Owner's Engineer,then the Owner can sign the agreement now. We have done this in the past. Then....when all of the Exhibits are ready/final, we could get the Mayor's and Clerk's signatures on the Agreement and the City could file the Agreement with Dakota County(or the Owner could). On past projects,we consider the Maintenance Agreement condition met once the Owner has signed and we have the single-sided Agreement with the Owner's original signatures. Then we process the Agreement for Mayor's/Clerk's signatures and take care of the filing with Dakota County. Regarding collecting a fee,according to the Agreement,the Owner pays for the recording of this Agreement(whether the Owner reimburses the City for the cost or the Owner records and pays Dakota County directly). Is the Owner also going to be responsible for recording the Development Agreement? Has the Development Agreement been signed and/or recorded yet? Option 1 or 2? Thank you, Gregg Gregg Thompson I Water Resources Specialist I City of Eagan411101111' j� Maintenance Facility 13501 Coachman Point I Eagan,MN 55122 � 11 651-675-5335 1 651-675-5360(Fax)1 GThompson(c�citvofeagan.com 3 From: Julie Strid Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 10:44 AM To: Aaron Nelson; Gregg Thompson Subject: RE: Summit - Storm Water Maint Agt. Who is putting this together for him? Please send to me once it is ready to be signed. If there a fee we need to collect? From: Alex Young [mailto:ayoung©mspcommercial.net] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 10:39 AM To: Pam Dudziak; Steve Miller Cc: Aaron Nelson; Julie Strid; Gregg Thompson Subject: RE: Summit - Storm Water Maint Agt. Looks fine. Let us know when you would like me to stop in and sign. Alex A. Young President MSP Commercial ayoung@mspcommercial.net Office (651) 287-8891 Fax (651) 287-8889 1215 Town Centre Drive Suite 130 Eagan, MN 55123 Stay connected with us! From: Pam Dudziak [mailto:pdudziak@cityofeagan.com] Sent:Thursday, March 03, 2016 8:36 AM To:Alex Young<ayoung@mspcommercial.net>; Steve Miller<smiller@mspcommercial.net> Cc:Aaron Nelson<anelson@cityofeagan.com>;Julie Strid <JStrid@cityofeagan.com>;Gregg Thompson <GThompson@cityofeagan.com> Subject: FW: Summit-Storm Water Maint Agt. Alex and Steve, Attached is the body of the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement for your information and review. Please do not print and sign. We are expecting a revised Exhibit C, per Aaron's comments on the building permit plans yesterday, and will update that when we get it. Also,we will be adding in the Jan. 25, 2016 date for the approved Site Plan on pg. 1. We will print out two original hard copies for signature here,with exhibits attached, and let you know when they are ready for you to sign. Once the Stormwater Agt. is executed,we'll contact you to record both the Final PD Agreement and the Stormwater Agreement. Please coordinate with Julie Strid on that. Thank you, 4 Pam Pamela Dudziak I Planner I City of Eagan411' City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan,MN 55122 1 651-675-5691 1651-675-5694(Fax)I pdudziak(a)_citvofeanan.com orki s -I THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error,please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. From: Gregg Thompson Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:48 PM To: Pam Dudziak Cc: Julie Strid; Aaron Nelson; Bob Bauer(bauerr@ dmshb.com) Subject: RE: Summit - Storm Water Maint Agt. Pam, I have the exhibits, although they may be making some revisions to some of the plan sheets pertaining to the stormwater management system in response to Aaron's recent email requesting revisions. So...there will likely be an updated Utility Plan (Exhibit C) sheet coming from the developer's engineer that will need to be included in the set of exhibits. With this understanding, the main body of the Maintenance Agreement is ready to be sent to the Owner for signature (attached). We will need at least two copies from the Owner with original signatures on each copy. Thanks, Gregg Gregg Thompson I Water Resources Specialist I City of Eagan Maintenance Facility 13501 Coachman Point I Eagan,MN 55122 Bain 651-675-5335 1651-675-5360(Fax) GThomi sonta�citvofeacian.com From: Pam Dudziak Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 8:34 AM To: Gregg Thompson Cc: Julie Strid; Aaron Nelson; Bob Bauer(bauerr(admshb.com) Subject: RE: Summit- Storm Water Maint Agt. Gregg, I expect that you have all the exhibits there that you need for the Agreement within the plans already submitted. Let me know if that is not the case, and please get in touch with their engineer directly if you need anything different. Thanks, Pam 5 Pamela Dudziak I Planner I City of Eagan City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan,MN 55122 1651-675-5691 1651-675-5694(Fax)I pdudziaki citvofeagan.com (Iti of ilg +ii THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error,please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. From: Gregg Thompson Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:40 PM To: Robert Bauer(RBauerdmshb.com) Cc: Pam Dudziak; Julie Strid; Aaron Nelson Subject: RE: Summit - Storm Water Maint Agt. Bob, Please review/revise as necessary the attached draft maintenance agreement for the Summit Orthopedics development project. Some Ownership questions/notes: 1.Applicant& Plan sheet stated Owner as: MSP Commercial (assumed name)—MSP Metro Operating Company, LLC https://mblsportal.sos.state.mn.us/Business/Sea rchDetails?filingGuid=6f8d7be5-cc95-e411-ae63-001ec94ffe7f 2.The "owner" listed on the Dakota County site is: "Eagan Woods 1 LLC" https://mblsportal.sos.state.mn.us/Business/SearchDetaiis?filingGuid=fd408e85-8dd4-e011-a886-001ec94ffe7f 3. I don't know the most recent legal description. On the Dakota County site it is still listed as "Eagan Woods Office Park —Outlot A" 4. Please check out the paragraph with the Council approval, specifically the final revision for the plan set was February 16, 2016—well after the Dec. 15, 2015 Council approval date (they were still working out stormwater details with us)—is this worded ok in the agreement? Please let me know if you have any questions on any of this. I'll be assembling the exhibits(owner submitted plan sheets, stormwater report,council minutes excerpt, etc.). Thank you! Gregg Gregg Thompson I Water Resources Specialist I City of Eagan Maintenance Facility 13501 Coachman Point I Eagan,MN 55122 4101100 651-675-5335 1651-675-5360(Fax)I GThompsonrg'�.citvofeagan.com of Eel 6 From: Pam Dudziak Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 4:51 PM To: Aaron Nelson; Gregg Thompson Cc: Julie Strid; Bob Bauer(bauerr@ dmshb.com) Subject: Summit - Storm Water Maint Agt. Gregg/Aaron, Please prepare the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement for the Summit Orthopedics project. I'm not sure if we have a form for that agreement now, or if the City Attorney's office will need to write it, so I've copied Bob on this message too. The SWM Agreement is supposed to be done before we issue a land disturbance permit, and I understand issuance of the Grading Permit is imminent. Also,they would record it with the Final PD Agreement,which is complete and being routed for signatures now. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Pam Pamela Dudziak I Planner I City of Eagan City Hall 13830 Pilot Knob Road I Eagan,MN 55122 1651-675-5691 1651-675-5694(Fax)I pdudziakna citvofeagan.com (ay of f` II all THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error,please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. 7 . • AAMERICAN :ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. ONO CONSULTANTS • ENVIRONMENTAL •GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • FORENSICS EXPLORATION AND REVIEW , Summit Orthopedics I-494 &Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota Report No. 01-06609 Date: September 21,2015 Prepared for: MSP Commercial 1215 Town Centre Drive Suite 130 Eagan,Minnesota 55123 www.amengtesLaom AMERICAN CONSULTANTS •OOSULTNENVIRONMENTAL A ENGINEERING •GEOTECHNICAL INC.TESTING, MATERIALS *FORENSICS September 21, 2015 MSP Commercial 1215 Town Centre Drive Suite 130 Eagan,Minnesota 55123 Attn: Alex Young (ayoung(a>,mspcommercial.net) RE: Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics I-494 &Pilot Knob Road Eagan,Minnesota Report No. 01-06609 Dear Mr. Young: American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) is pleased to present the results of our subsurface exploration program and geotechnical engineering review for the Summit Orthopedics project in Eagan, Minnesota. These services were performed according to the proposal we sent to you, dated August 21,2015. We are submitting two (2) copies of the report to you (one via email and one hard copy). Additional copies can be issued, at your request. Please call me or email me if you have any questions about the report or if I can be of further assistance to you. Sincerely, American Engineering Testing,Inc. If 76(dal/71, r.t Michael P. McCarthy,PE Principal Engineer Phone: 651.659.1364; Cell: 612.685.0058 mmccarthyr amengtest.eom Page i • 550 Cleveland Avenue North 1St.Paul,MN 55114 Phone 651-659-9001 (Toll Free 800-972-6364 Fax 651-659-1379(www.amengtest.com(AA/EEO This document shall not be reproduced,except in full,without written approval from American Engineering Testing,Inc. r Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;1-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. SIGNATURE PAGE Prepared for: Prepared by: MSP Commercial American Engineering Testing,Inc. 1215 Town Centre Drive 550 Cleveland Avenue North Suite 130 St. Paul,Minnesota 55114 Eagan,Minnesota 55123 (651) 659-9001/www.amengtest.com Attn: Mr.Alex Young Authored by: Reviewed by: ill/dtelt?"// .4•P- Michael P. McCarthy, PE Robin'. ' ger Principal Engineer Senior Engineer I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under Minnesota Statute Section 326.02 to 326.15 "/`2 Date: 1'2Pj< License#16688 Copyright 2015 American Engineering Testing,Inc. All Rights Reserved Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited by anyone other than the client for the specific project. Page ii Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 1 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING 3 4.1 Field Exploration Program 3 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3 5.1 Surface Observations 3 5.2 Subsurface Soils/Geology 4 5.3 Ground Water 5 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 5 6.1 Discussion 5 6.2 Building Grading 6 6.3 Foundations 7 6.4 Floor Slab 8 6.5 Exterior Building Backfill 9 6.6 Basement Wall Backfilling and Water Control 10 6.7 Retaining Wall Support and Backfilling 11 6.8 Pavements 13 7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 15 7.1 Potential Difficulties 15 7.2 Excavation Backsloping 16 7.3 Observations and Testing 16 8.0 LIMITATIONS 17 STANDARD SHEETS Floor Slab Moisture Vapor Protection Freezing Weather Effects on Building Construction Basement/Retaining Wall Backfill and Water Control APPENDIX A-Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Boring Log Notes Unified Soil Classification System Figure 1 —Site Layout and Approximate Boring Locations Figure 2—Boring Locations Subsurface Boring Logs and Logs of Hand Auger Borings APPENDIX B-Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Page iii Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Construction of a new building for Summit Orthopedics is being proposed in Eagan, Minnesota. To assist in planning and design, American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) was authorized to conduct a subsurface exploration program and perform a geotechnical engineering review for the project. This report presents the results of the above services, and provides our engineering recommendations based on this data. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES AET's services were performed according to our proposal to you, dated August 21, 2015. You authorized our proposal on August 24, 2015. The authorized scope consisted of the following: • Drilling eight(8)standard penetration test borings to depths of 15 to 40 feet. • Performing three(3) shallow hand auger borings to depths of about 5 feet. • Performing laboratory testing of soil boring samples. • Conducting a geotechnical engineering analysis based on the obtained data and preparing this report. These services are intended for geotechnical purposes. The scope is not intended to explore for the presence or extent of environmental contamination. 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION We understand the new construction will be a three-story medical office building and clinic. The building will also have a below-grade parking level which we understand will be heated at all times. The building will have a footprint of about 22,600 ft2 per floor, and will have a total of approximately 67,800 ft2 of space. Finished floor elevation of the new building is unknown at this time. Based on surrounding roadways, we estimate the main, at-grade floor elevation will be Page 1 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics; I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. at about 875.0 feet, and the below-grade parking level floor elevation is estimated to be about 864.0 feet. Refer to Figure 1 in Appendix A,which shows the general location and configuration of the proposed building as well as the approximate boring locations. We understand the new building will have cast-in-place concrete foundations and foundation walls, structural steel framing, glass windows, and brick or precast architectural panels around the exterior. Based on the assumed information, we estimate the maximum column loads will be about 400 kips or less, and bearing wall loads will be 7 to 10 kips per linear foot of wall. Our foundation design assumptions include a minimum factor of safety of three with respect to localized shear or base failure of the foundations. We assume the structure can tolerate total settlements of up to 1-inch, and differential settlements of up to Y2-inch over 30 feet. Light-duty pavements (bituminous surface) will be constructed on all sides of the building, with the exception of the east side. The pavements will be used by primarily automobile and light trucks with axle loads less than 4 tons. Access to the site will come from Eagan Woods Drive to the west. The driveway for the underground parking will enter the building on the north side. Heavier truck traffic for deliveries will also enter off Eagan Woods Drive, but will use designated drive lanes. We estimate the truck traffic will have axle loads up to 9 tons. The above stated information represents our understanding of the proposed construction. This information is an integral part of our engineering review. It is important that you contact us if there are changes from that described so that we can evaluate whether modifications to our recommendations are appropriate. Page 2 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. 4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING 4.1 Field Exploration Program Our subsurface exploration program consisted of eight (8) standard penetration test borings and three (3) hand auger borings, drilled between the dates of September 3 to 9, 2015. Logs of the borings and details of the methods used appear in Appendix A. The logs contain information concerning soil layering, soil classification, geologic description, and moisture condition. Relative density or consistency is also noted for the natural soils, which is based on the standard penetration resistance (N-value). The boring locations were selected by AET, and are shown on the Site Layout and Approximate Boring Locations sketch (Figure 1) in Appendix A. The borings were located in the field by AET personnel using GPS. The actual drilled boring locations, determined by GPS (sub-meter accuracy; not surveyor accuracy) are shown on the Boring Locations map (Figure 2)in Appendix A. The GPS coordinates for the borings are shown at the top of each respective log. The surface elevations at the boring locations were measured in the field by the AET drilling crew using an engineer's level. The benchmark used to determine the surface elevations was the rim of a catch basin located on the west side of Pilot Knob Road just south of the proposed south building line (see Figure 1). The elevation of the catch basin was given as 869.8 on the ALTA survey prepared by Sunde Land Surveying(dated August 14, 1996), 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS 5.1 Surface Observations The proposed building is located in the northern and eastern portion of the site; which is in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of I-494 and Pilot Knob Road in Eagan. Most of the site is heavily wooded with thick underbrush. The eastern part of the site is sparsely wooded and covered with tall grass and weeds. The site has steep grade changes and significant elevation Page 3of17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. changes. A ravine is located in the southwestern portion of the property. The northern and eastern parts of the site are higher in elevation. According to the ALTA Survey, site grades range from about 846 in the bottom of the ravine up to about 888 at the high point near the middle of the eastern property line. The majority of the site is much higher in elevation than the surrounding roadways. Curb lines along Eagan Woods Drive west of the property range in elevation from about 877 near the south end of the site, sloping down to about 870 near the north end in the parking lot west of the site. Elevations shown on the ALTA survey for Pilot Knob Road slope downward from south to north, ranging from about 878 down to 864. 5.2 Subsurface Soils/Geology The borings indicate a general soil profile consisting of existing fill and/or topsoil overlying naturally deposited alluvial (water-deposited) silty sands and sands. The hand auger borings in the ravine encountered slopewash and topsoil overlying the alluvial sands. 5.2.1 Fill/Topsoil/Slopewash The fill, topsoil, and slopewash present at the surface of each boring consist of darker colored silty sands which contain traces of roots and a little gravel. Some of the fill includes pieces of concrete. The topsoil and slopewash appear to contain a moderate amount of organics. We encountered the fill, topsoil, and slopewash to depths ranging from about 1 to 6'/2 feet at our boring locations, with the thicker layers in the ravine. The N-values recorded in the fill and topsoil are variable; therefore, we judge these soils to have variable strength and compressibility. The fill, topsoil, and slopewash are judged to be moderately slow to slow draining and are at least moderately susceptible to freeze-thaw movements. Page 4 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;1-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. 5.2.2 Coarse Alluvium Coarse alluvial soils are the primary deposit at this site and are present below the fill and topsoil to the depths of the borings. The coarse alluvium consists of silty sands (USCS Classification System symbol SM), sands with silt (SP-SM), and sands (SP). The sands contain variable amounts of gravel, and could also contain cobbles and/or boulders. The N-values recorded in the coarse alluvial soils indicate they range from loose to very dense. We judge the coarse alluvium to have moderate to high strength and low compressibility. The sands and sands with silt are judged to be fast-draining soils that have low susceptibility to freeze-thaw movements. The silty sands are moderately slow-draining soils that are judged to have moderate susceptibility to freeze-thaw movements. 5.3 Ground Water Ground water levels did not develop within the open boreholes during our drilling activities. Because the soils in the borings are predominantly free-draining sands and sands with silt, these readings can be considered a reliable indication of the steady-state water level at the times and locations which they were recorded. Based on the water level measurements, it is our judgment that the hydrostatic ground water level is below the depths explored by our borings. Ground water levels will fluctuate seasonally and annually due to varying amounts of rainfall and snow melt, as well as other factors. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Discussion The naturally deposited alluvial sands and silty sands at the boring locations are judged to have moderate to high strength. Compaction of these soils will increase their load bearing ability and reduce potential settlements. We have assumed a lower floor elevation of 864.0 feet for the Page 5 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;1-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. building, which will require significant excavation to establish this elevation. The naturally deposited sands that are present at (and below)this elevation are judged to have moderately high to high strength, and should be capable of supporting the proposed building. If actual floor elevations deviate from our assumed value, we should be contacted to re-evaluate the soil conditions and their ability to support the proposed construction. Based on the penetration borings around the site, and the hand auger borings in the ravine, it does not appear that the fill, topsoil, or slopewash are highly compressible. After removing surface vegetation and organics, the underlying stable on-site soils can be used to support the future pavements. Because of the severe slopes, benching of the excavations will be required prior to fill placement to reduce the risks of slope failure. 6.2 Building Grading 6.2.1 Excavation Excavation to establish the assumed lower level floor and foundation grades should expose medium dense to dense naturally deposited alluvial sands. The building foundations and floor slabs can be constructed directly on these naturally deposited sands. Prior to construction of the footings, we recommend the naturally deposited sands be surface compacted with a large, self- propelled vibratory roller to densify zones of looser soils, improve load bearing capabilities, and to reduce post-construction settlements. The compactor should make a minimum of 5 passes over the soils in the bottom of the excavation. The excavation recommendations presented above are based on the soil conditions at the specific boring locations. Because conditions will vary away from the boring locations, we recommend that AET geotechnical personnel observe and confirm the competency of the soils in the excavation bottom prior to fill placement. Page 6 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. 6.2.2 Fill Placement and Compaction We recommend that all fill placed below the floor slabs of the building, such as wall backfill and utility trench backfill, be compacted in thin loose lifts to at least 93% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry unit density (per ASTM: D1557). Based on the soil conditions, we do not expect that fill will be needed below the building foundations. If fill is needed below the footings, we recommend the fill be compacted in thin loose lifts to at least 100% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. We recommend that the fill which is placed and compacted below the building consist of inorganic sands (SP) or sands with silt(SP-SM)that have no more than 12% of the particles (by weight) finer than the #200 sieve. The use of silty sands, silts, or clayey soils is not recommended. The fill soils should be free of debris and rubble. Fill should not be placed over frozen soils and frozen soils should not be used as fill. All fill soils should be compacted with equipment which will densify the entire lift of fill. We recommend the sand fill be placed in loose lifts up to 12 inches thick; depending on the size of . the compactor. 6.3 Foundations Assuming the soils present at building foundation grades consist of medium dense to dense coarse alluvial sands, compacted as recommended previously, it is our opinion that the building can be supported by conventional spread footings placed on the competent naturally deposited sands. We recommend the perimeter foundations adjacent to heated building spaces be placed at least 42 inches below exterior grades. Interior footings in heated building spaces can be placed at shallow depths below the floor slab, but not less than 2 feet below the slab for proper embedment. Foundations in unheated conditions (such as exterior canopies, garage entrance Page 7 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. areas, retaining walls, or loading dock foundations) should be placed at least 60 inches below exterior grades. Based on the soil conditions encountered, it is our opinion the foundations for the proposed building can be designed using a net maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 8,000 psf. It is our judgment this design pressure should have a factor of safety of at least three against localized shear or base failure. We estimate that total settlements should be 1-inch or less, and differential settlements under these loads should not exceed 1/2-inch. If the building floor slab and foundation grades differ from our assumptions, please contact us to review this recommended bearing pressure and the settlement amounts. 6.4 Floor Slab We expect the floor slab of the building will be supported by the compacted alluvial sands and sands with silt. Based on this, we recommend designing the floor slabs using a Modulus of Subgrade Reaction(k-value) of 225 pci. If a 6-inch(or thicker) layer of aggregate base is placed immediately below the concrete slab, a k-value of 250 can be used for slab design. The use of certain types of flooring may require the installation of moisture/vapor membranes below the floor slab. For recommendations pertaining to moisture and vapor protection of interior floor slabs, we refer you to the standard sheet entitled "Floor Slab Moisture/Vapor Protection" at the end of this report. Page 8of17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. 6.5 Exterior Building Backfill 6.5.1 Compaction Fill that is placed below exterior sidewalks, stoops, and exterior slabs should be compacted to a minimum of 93% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. Fill placed in landscaped areas should be compacted to a minimum of 87% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. Fill placed below pavements should be compacted to 98% if present in the top 3 feet of the subgrade. 6.5.2 Frost Susceptibility and Freeze-Thaw Concerns To minimize potential heaving of exterior slabs, stoops, and sidewalks, we recommend the silty sand fill and topsoil be removed to expose the naturally deposited coarse alluvium. Fill needed to re-establish grades below the exterior slabs, stoops, and sidewalks should consist of sands and sands with silt having no more than 12% of the particles (by weight) finer than the #200 sieve. These soils have low susceptibility to freeze-thaw movements and appear readily available on this site. If the silty sands that exist at the surface are left in place, freeze-thaw movements of these soils will likely lead to heaving of the exterior slabs, sidewalks, and stoops. These differential frost heave movements can create trip hazards. Refer to the standard sheet "Freezing Weather Effects on Building Construction" at the end of this report for concerns about frost-related movements and precautions. This is particularly important at exterior slab and stoop areas where they are adjacent to the proposed building. Page 9 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No. 01-06609 TESTING,INC. 6.6 Basement Wall Backfilling and Water Control 6.6.1 Backfilling We recommend the backfill placed around the below-grade building walls consist of free- draining sands (SP) having no more than 5% of the particles (by weight) finer than the #200 sieve and no more than 40% of the particles finer than the #40 sieve. This type of sand will provide proper drainage of the wall backfill, is easier to compact, and is available on-site. The zone of sand backfill should extend outward from the walls at least 2 feet at bottom-of-footing elevation, and then extend upward and outward from the walls at a 30 degree angle from vertical. We recommend capping this sand backfill in landscaped areas with at least 1 foot of silty or clayey fill soils which are graded to slope downward away from the building and shed surface water away from the building. 6.6.2 Lateral Pressures Typically, the main level floor slab of the building is in-place prior to backfilling basement walls. This does not allow the basement walls to rotate at the top. Because of this, we recommend using the at-rest condition for design of the walls. In this situation, the walls should be designed using an equivalent fluid weight lateral earth pressure of 50 pcf. We recommend the lower level floor slabs be constructed prior to backfilling the basement walls. All walls should be properly braced. We recommend using an equivalent fluid weight passive lateral pressure of 450 pcf for the naturally deposited sands or the sand fill. Movements on the order of 1-inch or more are required to develop full passive resistance; therefore, a factor of safety of 2 should be applied to this value. We recommend using a friction factor of 0.45 for resistance to foundation sliding on the granular base soils. We refer you to the standard sheet entitled "Basement/Retaining Wall Backfill and Water Control" at the end of this report for further details. Page 10 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. 6.6.3 Dampproofing and Ground Water Control Although not observed in the soil boring samples, lenses and layers of slower-draining silty and clayey soils may exist within the coarse alluvial sands. Because these soils can temporarily perch ground water above them, we recommend dampproofing be applied to the exteriors of all below-grade walls. Because free-draining sands will exist below planned footing grades,it is our opinion that drain tiles should not be necessary around the exterior of the building foundation walls. 6.7 Retaining Wall Support and Backfilling 6.7.1 Excavation We expect retaining walls will be needed on the north side of the building where the driveway enters the lower level garage. We anticipate that the retaining wall foundations will bear on the competent naturally deposited alluvial sands, similar to the building. However, because of sloping terrain and lower site grades to the north and west, it may be necessary to perform corrective excavation to remove topsoil and/or existing fill soils. The excavations should expose the naturally deposited alluvial sands and silty sands. If the excavations extend below design foundation grades, the excavation bottoms should be widened at least 1 foot for every vertical foot of fill needed below the footing (i.e. 1:1 lateral oversizing). The soils in the retaining wall footing excavations should be thoroughly surface compacted before foundation construction or fill placement. At those locations where fill will be placed on sloping excavations, we recommend benching the sloped surface (benches or steps cut parallel to the slope contour) prior to placing the fill. Benching is recommended where slopes are steeper than 4H:1 V. Page 11 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING, INC. 6.7.2 Backfilling If fill is needed below the retaining wall footings, we recommend using sands and sands with silt having no more than 12% of the particles (by weight) finer than the #200 sieve. These sands should be placed and compacted in thin loose lifts to achieve a minimum compaction level of 98%of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (per ASTM: D1557). We recommend the backfill placed behind the retaining walls consist of free-draining sands (SP) having no more than 5% of the particles (by weight) finer than the #200 sieve and no more than 40% of the particles finer than the #40 sieve. This type of sand will provide proper drainage of the wall backfill, is easier to compact, and is available on-site. The zone of sand backfill should extend outward from the walls at least 2 feet at bottom-of-footing elevation, and then extend upward and outward from the walls at a 30 degree angle from vertical. We recommend capping this sand backfill in landscaped areas with at least 1 foot of silty or clayey fill soils which are graded to slope downward away from the wall and shed surface water away from the wall. 6.7.3 Retaining Wall Footings We recommend designing the retaining wall footings using a maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure of 5,000 psf. This value is lower than that used for the building, and reflects on the potential for weaker alluvial soils to exist near foundation grades. This load should provide a factor of safety of 3 against shear or base failure of the footings, and should limit total and differential settlements to 1-inch and 1/2-inch, respectively. 6.7.4 Lateral Pressures Because the retaining wall is unrestrained at the top and will rotate during backfilling, we recommend using the active condition for design of the walls. In this situation, the walls should be designed using an equivalent fluid weight lateral earth pressure of 35 pcf. We recommend Page 12 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;1-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. using an equivalent fluid weight passive lateral pressure of 450 pcf (with an applied factor of safety of at least 2) for the naturally deposited sands or the sand fill. Movements on the order of 1-inch or more are required to develop full passive resistance;therefore, a factor of safety should be used. We recommend using a friction factor of 0.45 for resistance to foundation sliding on the granular base soils. Refer to the standard sheet entitled `Basement/Retaining Wall Backfill and Water Control"at the end of this report for further details. 6.7.5 Ground Water Control Because free-draining sands will exist below planned footing grades of the retaining walls, it is our opinion that drain tiles should not be necessary behind the retaining walls. 6.8 Pavements 6.8.1 Subgrade Preparation To prepare the pavement subgrades, we recommend removing all darker colored "topsoil type" fill with roots, the topsoil, and highly organic slopewash to expose less organic fill soils or silty sands, or the underlying alluvial sands and silty sands. The excavations should also extend laterally beyond the curbs or the edges of the pavements for distribution of loads through the fill. We recommend extending the excavations at least '/2 foot laterally beyond the backs of the curb or the edges of the new pavements for each vertical foot of fill needed at the various locations (i.e. 1/2:1 lateral oversizing). In areas where fill will be placed on sloping excavations, we recommend benching the, sloped surface (benches or steps cut parallel to the slope contour) prior to placing the fill. Benching is recommended where slopes are steeper than 4H:1 V. Page 13 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;1-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. The inorganic granular soils exposed after excavation should then be scarified to a depth of about 12 inches, moisture conditioned, and surface compacted to at least 93% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. If the soils are present in the upper 3 feet of the subgrade (critical subgrade zone) they should be compacted to at least 98% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. After compaction, the subgrade soils should be test rolled with a loaded tandem-axle dump truck to identify any weak or unstable soils that will need remediation. If weak or unstable soils are detected,they should be removed and replaced,or be aerated, dried, and recompacted. Fill can then be placed as needed to attain final subgrade elevation. The fill should be placed and compacted in general accordance with the requirements of MnDOT Specification 2105.3F1 (Specified Density Method). For this project, we have modified this specification slightly to require that soils placed within critical subgrade zone be compacted to a minimum of 98%of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM: D1557). Fill placed below the critical subgrade zone should be compacted to a minimum of 93% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. The fill used below the pavements should consist of inorganic sands and silty sands, similar to the on-site soils. 6.8.2 Pavement Section Thicknesses Based on the subgrade being prepared as recommended in Section 6.8.1 above, it is our opinion that the on-site silty sands represent the limiting subgrade condition in terms of design R-value. We recommend using a R-value of about 50 for pavement design. Our recommended pavement designs,based on the above assumptions, are shown in Table 6.6.3 below. Page 14 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;1-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. Table 6.6.3—Bituminous Pavement Thickness Designs Material Section Thicknesses(R-value=50) Light Duty(inches) Heavy Duty(inches) Bituminous Wear 11A 2 Bituminous Base 2 2 Class 5, 6 or 7 Aggregate Base 6 9 Light duty pavements refer to automobile and light truck parking spaces. Heavy duty pavements refer to drive lanes and truck traffic areas. 6.8.3 Pavement Maintenance Even if placed and compacted properly on stable subgrade conditions, bituminous pavements will still experience cracking in 1 to 3 years, primarily due to temperature-related expansion and shrinkage. We recommend that a regularly scheduled maintenance program consisting of patching of cracks and local distressed areas be implemented. Seal coating of the pavement surface after 3 to 5 years often helps prolong the pavement life. 7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 Potential Difficulties 7.1.1 Cobbles,Boulders,Rubble, and Debris The alluvial sands likely contain cobbles and/or boulders. The existing fill soils may contain miscellaneous rubble and debris, such as at Boring SB-1. These larger particles will make excavating procedures more difficult than normal if they are encountered. Page 15 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. 7.1.2 Water in Excavations Water may collect in excavations, usually due to run-off associated with rainfall or snow melt. To reduce the potential for soil disturbance and weakening, we recommend the water be removed from within the excavations as soon as possible. Based on the soils encountered, we anticipate the water can be handled with conventional sump pumping. 7.1.3 Disturbance of Soils The fine grained silty sands found near the surface on this site can become disturbed by construction traffic, especially if the soils are wet. If soils become disturbed, they should be subcut to the underlying undisturbed soils. The subcut soils can then be dried and recompacted back into place, or they should be removed and replaced with drier imported fill. 7.2 Excavation Backsloping If excavation faces are not retained, the excavations should maintain maximum allowable slopes in accordance with OSHA Regulations (Standards 29 CFR), Part 1926, Subpart P, "Excavations" (can be found on www.osha.gov). Even with the required OSHA sloping, water seepage or surface runoff can potentially induce sideslope erosion or running which could require slope maintenance. 7.3 Observations and Testing The recommendations in this report are based on the conditions found at our test boring locations. Because the soil conditions may vary away from the soil boring locations, we recommend AET geotechnical personnel observe soils in excavations during construction to evaluate these potential changes. Soil density testing should also be performed on new fill placed in order to document that project specifications for compaction have been satisfied. Page 16 of 17 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. 8.0 LINIITATIONS Within the limitations of scope, budget, and schedule, our services have been conducted according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices at this time and location. Other than this,no warranty, either expressed or implied, is intended. Important information regarding risk management and proper use of this report is given in Appendix B entitled"Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use". Page 17of17 FLOOR SLAB MOISTURE/VAPOR PROTECTION Floor slab design relative to moisture/vapor protection should consider the type and location of two elements,a granular layer and a vapor membrane(vapor retarder,water resistant barrier or vapor barrier). In the following sections,the pros and cons of the possible options regarding these elements will be presented,such that you and your specifier can make an engineering decision based on the benefits and costs of the choices. GRANULAR LAYER In American Concrete Institute(ACI)302.1R-04,a"base material"is recommended over the vapor membrane,rather than the conventional clean "sand cushion" material. The base layer should be a minimum of 4 inches (100 mm)thick,trimmable, compactable, granular fill (not sand), a so-called crusher-run material. Usually graded from 1%Z inches to 2 inches(38 to 50 mm)down to rock dust is suitable. Following compaction,the surface can be choked off with a fine-grade material. We refer you to ACI 302.1R-04 for additional details regarding the requirements for the base material. In cases where potential static water levels or significant perched water sources appear near or above the floor slab, an under floor drainage system may be needed wherein a draintile system is placed within a thicker clean sand or gravel layer.Such a system should be properly engineered depending on subgrade soil types and rate/head of water inflow. VAPOR MEMBRANE The need for a vapor membrane depends on whether the floor slab will have a vapor sensitive covering,will have vapor sensitive items stored on the slab,or if the space above the slab will be a humidity controlled area. If the project does not have this vapor sensitivity or moisture control need,placement of a vapor membrane may not be necessary.Your decision will then relate to whether to use the ACI base material or a conventional sand cushion layer.However,if any of the above sensitivity issues apply, placement of a vapor membrane is recommended. Some floor covering systems (adhesives and flooring materials) require installation of a vapor membrane to limit the slab moisture content as a condition of their • warranty. VAPOR MEMBRANE/GRANULAR LAYER PLACEMENT A number of issues should be considered when deciding whether to place the vapor membrane above or below the granular layer. The benefits of placing the slab on a granular layer, with the vapor membrane placed below the granular layer,include reduction of the following: • Slab curling during the curing and drying process. • Time of bleeding,which allows for quicker finishing. • Vapor membrane puncturing. • Surface blistering or delamination caused by an extended bleeding period. • Cracking caused by plastic or drying shrinkage. The benefits of placing the vapor membrane over the granular layer include the following: • A lower moisture emission rate is achieved faster. • Eliminates a potential water reservoir within the granular layer above the membrane. • Provides a"slip surface",thereby reducing slab restraint and the associated random cracking. If a membrane is to be used in conjunction with a granular layer,the approach recommended depends on slab usage and the construction schedule.The vapor membrane should be placed above the granular layer when: • Vapor sensitive floor covering systems are used or vapor sensitive items will be directly placed on the slab. • The area will be humidity controlled,but the slab will be placed before the building is enclosed and sealed from rain. • Required by a floor covering manufacturer's system warranty. The vapor membrane should be placed below the granular layer when: • Used in humidity controlled areas(without vapor sensitive coverings/stored items),with the roof membrane in place,and the building enclosed to the point where precipitation will not intrude into the slab area.Consideration should be given to slight sloping of the membrane to edges where draintile or other disposal methods can alleviate potential water sources,such as pipe or roof leaks,foundation wall damp proofing failure,fire sprinkler system activation,etc. There may be cases where membrane placement may have a detrimental effect on the subgrade support system (e.g., expansive soils).In these cases,your decision will need to weigh the cost of subgrade options and the performance risks. 01REP013(12/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. • FREEZING WEATHER EFFECTS ON BUILDING CONSTRUCTION GENERAL Because water expands upon freezing and soils contain water,soils which are allowed to freeze will heave and lose density. Upon thawing,these soils will not regain their original strength and density. The extent of heave and density/strength loss depends on the soil type and moisture condition. Heave is greater in soils with higher percentages of fines (silts/clays). High silt content soils are most susceptible, due to their high capillary rise potential which can create ice lenses.Fine grained soils generally heave about 1/4"to 3/8"for each foot of frost penetration.This can translate to I"to 2"of total frost heave.This total amount can be significantly greater if ice lensing occurs. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS Clayey and silty soils can be used as perimeter backfill, although the effect of their poor drainage and frost properties should be considered.Basement areas will have special drainage and lateral load requirements which are not discussed here.Frost heave may be critical in doorway areas.Stoops or sidewalks adjacent to doorways could be designed as structural slabs supported on frost footings with void spaces below. With this design,movements may then occur between the structural slab and the adjacent on-grade slabs.Non-frost susceptible sands(with less than 5%passing a#200 sieve)can be used below such areas.Depending on the function of surrounding areas,the sand layer may need a thickness transition away from the area where movement is critical.With sand placement over slower draining soils, subsurface drainage would be needed for the sand layer. High density extruded insulation could be used within the sand to reduce frost penetration,thereby reducing the sand thickness needed. We caution that insulation placed near the surface can increase the potential for ice glazing of the surface. The possible effects of adfreezing should be considered if clayey or silty soils are used as backfill. Adfreezing occurs when backfill adheres to rough surfaced foundation walls and lifts the wall as it freezes and heaves.This occurrence is most common with masonry block walls, unheated or poorly heated building situations and clay backfill.The potential is also increased where backfill soils are poorly compacted and become saturated.The risk of adfreezing can be decreased by placing a low friction separating layer between the wall and backfill. Adfreezing can occur on exterior piers(such as deck,fence,or other similar pier footings),even if a smooth surface is provided. This is more likely in poor drainage situations where soils become saturated. Additional footing embedment and/or widened footings below the frost zones(which include tensile reinforcement)can be used to resist uplift forces. Specific designs would require individual analysis. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS Foundations,slabs and other improvements which may be affected by frost movements should be insulated from frost penetration during freezing weather.If filling takes place during freezing weather,all frozen soils,snow and ice should be stripped from areas to be filled prior to new fill placement. The new fill should not be allowed to freeze during transit,placement or compaction.This should be considered in the project scheduling,budgeting and quantity estimating. It is usually beneficial to perform cold weather earthwork operations in small areas where grade can be attained quickly rather than working larger areas where a greater amount of frost stripping may be needed. If slab subgrade areas freeze,we recommend the subgrade be thawed prior to floor slab placement.The frost action may also require reworking and recompaction of the thawed subgrade. 01REP015(12/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. BASEMENT/RETAINING WALL BACKFILL AND WATER CONTROL DRAINAGE Below grade basements should include a perimeter backfill drainage system on the exterior side of the wall. The exception may be where basements lie within free draining sands where water will not perch in the backfill.Drainage systems should consist of perforated or slotted PVC drainage pipes located at the bottom of the backfill trench,lower than the interior floor grade.The drain pipe should be surrounded by properly graded filter rock.A filter fabric should then envelope the filter rock.The drain pipe should be connected to a suitable means of disposal,such as a sump basket or a gravity outfall. A storm sewer gravity outfall would be preferred over exterior gravity drainage,as the latter may freeze during winter.For non-building,exterior retaining walls,weep holes at the base of the wall can be substituted for a drain pipe. BACKFILLING Prior to backfilling, dampproofing or waterproofing should be applied on perimeter basement walls. The backfill materials placed against basement walls will exert lateral loadings.To reduce this loading by allowing for drainage,we recommend using free draining sands for backfill.The zone of sand backfill should extend outward from the wall at least 2 feet,and then upward and outward from the wall at a 30 degree or greater angle from vertical.As a minimum,the sands used on this project should contain no greater than 5%of particles(by weight)finer than the#200 sieve and nor more than 40%of the particles(by weight)finer than the#40 sieve.The sand backfill should be placed in lifts and compacted with portable compaction equipment.This compaction should be to the specified levels if slabs or pavements are placed above.Where slab or pavements are not above,we recommend capping the sand backfill with a layer of clayey soil to minimize surface water infiltration. Positive surface drainage away from the building should also be maintained. If surface capping or positive surface drainage cannot be maintained,then the trench should be filled with more permeable soils,such as the Fine Filter or Coarse Filter Aggregates defined in MnDOT Specification 3149.You should recognize that if the backfill soils are not properly compacted,settlements may occur which may affect surface drainage away from the building. Backfilling with silty or clayey soil is possible but not preferred.These soils can build-up water which increases lateral pressures and results in wet wall conditions and possible water infiltration into the basement.If you elect to place silty or clayey soils as backfill, we recommend you place a prefabricated drainage composite against the wall which is hydraulically connected to a drainage pipe at the base of the backfill trench.High plasticity clays should be avoided as backfill due to their swelling potential. LATERAL PRESSURES Lateral earth pressures on below-grade walls vary, depending on backfill soil classification,backfill compaction and slope of the backfill surface.Static or dynamic surcharge loads near the wall will also increase lateral wall pressure.For design,we recommend the following ultimate lateral earth pressure values(given in equivalent fluid pressure values)for a drained soil compacted to 95%of the Standard Proctor density and a level ground surface. Equivalent Fluid Density Soil Type Active(pcf) At-Rest(pct) Sands(SP or SP-SM) 35 50 Silty Sands(SM) 45 65 Fine Grained Soils(SC,CL or ML) 70 90 Basement walls are normally restrained at the top which restricts movement. In this case,the design lateral pressures should be the"at-rest"pressure situation.Retaining walls which are free to rotate or deflect should be designed using the active case.Lateral earth pressures will be significantly higher than that shown if the backfill soils are not drained and become saturated. 01REP014(12/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;I-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Boring Log Notes Unified Soil Classification System Figure 1 — Site Layout and Approximate Boring Locations Figure 2—Boring Locations Subsurface Boring Logs and Logs of Hand Auger Borings Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Report No. 01-06609 A.1 FIELD EXPLORATION The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling and sampling eight(8) standard penetration test borings and three (3) hand auger borings. The approximate locations of the borings appear on Figures 1 and 2, preceding the Subsurface Boring Logs in this appendix. A.2 SAMPLING METHODS A.2.1 Split-Spoon Samples(SS)-Calibrated to N60 Values Standard penetration (split-spoon) samples were collected in general accordance with ASTM: D1586 with one primary modification. The ASTM test method consists of driving a 2-inch O.D. split-barrel sampler into the in-situ soil with a 140-pound hammer dropped from a height of 30 inches. The sampler is driven a total of 18 inches into the soil.After an initial set of 6 inches, the number of hammer blows to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known as the standard penetration resistance or N-value. Our method uses a modified hammer weight,which is determined by measuring the system energy using a Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA)and an instrumented rod. In the past, standard penetration N-value tests were performed using a rope and cathead for the lift and drop system. The energy transferred to the split-spoon sampler was typically limited to about 60%of its potential energy due to the friction inherent in this system.This converted energy then provides what is known as an N60 blow count. The most recent drill rigs incorporate an automatic hammer lift and drop system, which has higher energy efficiency and subsequently results in lower N-values than the traditional N60 values. By using the PDA energy measurement equipment,we are able to determine actual energy generated by the drop hammer. With the various hammer systems available,we have found highly variable energies ranging from 55% to over 100%. Therefore, the intent of AET's hammer calibrations is to vary the hammer weight such that hammer energies lie within about 60%to 65%of the theoretical energy of a 140-pound weight falling 30 inches. The current ASTM procedure acknowledges the wide variation in N-values, stating that N-values of 100% or more have been observed. Although we have not yet determined the statistical measurement uncertainty of our calibrated method to date,we can state that the accuracy deviation of the N-values using this method is significantly better than the standard ASTM Method. A.2.2 Disturbed Samples(DS)/Spin-up Samples(SU) Sample types described as"DS" or"SU" on the boring logs are disturbed samples, which are taken from the flights of the auger. Because the auger disturbs the samples,possible soil layering and contact depths should be considered approximate. A.2.3 Sampling Limitations Unless actually observed in a sample,contacts between soil layers are estimated based on the spacing of samples and the action of drilling tools.Cobbles,boulders,and other large objects generally cannot be recovered from test borings,and they may be present in the ground even if they are not noted on the boring logs. Determining the thickness of"topsoil"layers is usually limited,due to variations in topsoil definition,sample recovery, and other factors. Visual-manual description often relies on color for determination, and transitioning changes can account for significant variation in thickness judgment. Accordingly, the topsoil thickness presented on the logs should not be the sole basis for calculating topsoil stripping depths and volumes. If more accurate information is needed relating to thickness and topsoil quality definition, alternate methods of sample retrieval and testing should be employed. A.3 CLASSIFICATION METHODS Soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are based on the Unified Soil Classification (USC) system. The USC system is described in ASTM: D2487 and D2488. Where laboratory classification tests (sieve analysis or Atterberg Limits) have been performed, accurate classifications per ASTM: D2487 are possible. Otherwise, soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are visual-manual judgments. Charts are attached which provide information on the USC system,the descriptive terminology, and the symbols used on the boring logs. The boring logs include descriptions of apparent geology. The geologic depositional origin of each soil layer is interpreted primarily by observation of the soil samples, which can be limited. Observations of the surrounding topography, vegetation, and development can sometimes aid this judgment. Appendix A-Page 1 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. Appendix A Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Report No. 01-06609 A.4 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS The ground water level measurements are shown at the bottom of the boring logs. The following information appears under "Water Level Measurements"on the logs: • Date and Time of measurement • Sampled Depth:lowest depth of soil sampling at the time of measurement • Casing Depth:depth to bottom of casing or hollow-stem auger at time of measurement • Cave-in Depth:depth at which measuring tape stops in the borehole • Water Level:depth in the borehole where free water is encountered • Drilling Fluid Level: same as Water Level,except that the liquid in the borehole is drilling fluid The true location of the water table at the boring locations may be different than the water levels measured in the boreholes.This is possible because there are several factors that can affect the water level measurements in the borehole. Some of these factors include: permeability of each soil layer in profile, presence of perched water, amount of time between water level readings, presence of drilling fluid,weather conditions,and use of borehole casing. A.5 TEST STANDARD LIMITATIONS Field and laboratory testing is done in general conformance with the described procedures. Compliance with any other standards referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied. A.6 SAMPLE STORAGE Unless notified to do otherwise,we routinely retain representative samples of the soils recovered from the borings for a period of 30 days. After this time period,the soils are then discarded. Appendix A-Page 2 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. BORING LOG NOTES DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS TEST SYMBOLS Symbol Definition Symbol Definition AR: Sample of material obtained from cuttings blown out CONS: One-dimensional consolidation test the top of the borehole during air rotary procedure. DEN: Dry density,pcf B,H,N: Size of flush joint casing DST: Direct shear test CAS: Pipe casing, number indicates nominal diameter in E: Pressuremeter Modulus,tsf inches HYD: Hydrometer analysis COT: Clean-out tube LL: Liquid Limit,% DC: Drive casing;number indicates diameter in inches LP: Pressuremeter Limit Pressure,tsf DM: Drilling mud or bentonite slurry OC: Organic Content,% DR: Driller(initials) PERM: Coefficient of permeability(K)test;F-Field; DS: Disturbed sample from auger flights L-Laboratory DP: Direct push drilling; a 2.125 inch OD outer casing PL: Plastic Limit,% with an inner 11/2 inch ID plastic tube is driven qP: Pocket Penetrometer strength,tsf(approximate) continuously into the ground. qc: Static cone bearing pressure,tsf FA: Flight auger; number indicates outside diameter in q,,: Unconfined compressive strength,psf inches R: Electrical Resistivity,ohm-cms HA: Hand auger;number indicates outside diameter RQD: Rock Quality Designation of Rock Core, in percent HSA: Hollow stem auger;number indicates inside diameter (aggregate length of core pieces 4"or more in length in inches as a percent of total core run) LG: Field logger(initials) SA: Sieve analysis MC: Column used to describe moisture condition of TRX: Triaxial compression test samples and for the ground water level symbols VSR: Vane shear strength,remolded(field),psf N(BPF): Standard penetration resistance(N-value)in blows per VSU: Vane shear strength,undisturbed(field),psf foot(see notes) WC: Water content,as percent of dry weight NQ: NQ wireline core barrel %-200: Percent of material finer than#200 sieve PQ: PQ wireline core barrel RDA: Rotary drilling with compressed air and roller or drag STANDARD PENETRATION TEST NOTES bit. (Calibrated Hammer Weight) RDF: Rotary drilling with drilling fluid and roller or drag bit The standard penetration test consists of driving a split-spoon REC: In split-spoon(see notes),direct push and thin-walled sampler with a drop hammer(calibrated weight varies to provide tube sampling, the recovered length (in inches) of N60 values)and counting the number of blows applied in each of sample. In rock coring,the length of core recovered three 6" increments of penetration. If the sampler is driven less (expressed as percent of the total core run). Zero than 18" (usually in highly resistant material), permitted in indicates no sample recovered. ASTM:D1586,the blows for each complete 6"increment and for SS: Standard split-spoon sampler (steel; 1.5" is inside each partial increment is on the boring log.For partial increments, diameter; 2" outside diameter); unless indicated the number of blows is shown to the nearest 0.1'below the slash. otherwise SU Spin-up sample from hollow stem auger The length of sample recovered,as shown on the"REC"column, TW: Thin-walled tube;number indicates inside diameter in may be greater than the distance indicated in the N column.The inches disparity is because the N-value is recorded below the initial 6" WASH: Sample of material obtained by screening returning set (unless partial penetration defined in ASTM: D1586 is rotary drilling fluid or by which has collected inside encountered)whereas the length of sample recovered is for the the borehole after"falling"through drilling fluid entire sampler drive(which may even extend more than 18"). WH: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod and hammer WR: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod 94mm: 94 millimeter wireline core barrel ♦: Water level directly measured in boring V: Estimated water level based solely on sample appearance OIREP052C(7/11) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AMERICAN 13 ASTM Designations:D 2487,D2488 ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. Soil Classification Notes Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests" Group Group Name" "Based on the material passing the 3-in Symbol (75-mm) sieve. Coarse-Grained Gravels More Clean Gravels Cu>4 and 1<Cc<3E GW Well graded gravelF KIf field sample contained cobbles or Soils More than 50%coarse Less than 5% boulders,or both, add"with cobbles or than 50% fraction retained fines Cu<4 and/or I>Cc>3E GP Poorly graded gravel'. boulders,or both"to group name. retained on on No.4 sieve °Gravels with 5 to 12%fines require dual No.200 sieve Gravels with Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel'°." symbols: Fines more GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt than 12%fines C Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelF°" GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt Sands 50%or Clean Sands Cu>6 and l<Cc<3E SW Well-graded sand GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay more of coarse Less than 5% °Sands with 5 to 12%fines require dual fraction passes fines° Cu<6 and I>Cc>3E SP Poorly-graded sand' symbols: No.4 sieve SW-SM well-graded sand with silt Sands with Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand ' SW-SC well-graded sand with clay Fines more SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt than 12%fines° Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand°H SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay Fine-Grained Silts and Clays inorganic PI>7 and plots on or above CL Lean clay&" Soils 50%or Liquid limit less "A"line' (D51)2 more passes than 50 PI<4 orlots below ML Siltt.L.M ECU=Doo/Dm Cc= the No.200 "A"line D1ox Doo sieve organic Liquid limit-oven dried<0.75 OL Organic clay'.L.M.N Liquid limit-not dried L rrto FIf soil contains>15%sand,add"with (see Plasticity q Organic silt'' sand"to group name. Chart below) °If fines classify as CL-ML,use dual Silts and Clays inorganic PI plots on or above"A"line CH Fat clay"L M symbol GC-GM,or SC-SM. Liquid limit 50 If fines are organic,add"with organic or more PI plots below"A"line MH Elastic silt-Kim fines"to group name. 'If soil contains>l 5%gravel,add"with organic Liquid limit-oven dried<0.75 OH Organic clayK-'F gavel"to group name. If Atterberg limits plot is hatched area, Liquid limit-not dried Organic silt"L."Lo soils is a CL-ML silty clay. Highly organic Primarily organic matter, dark PT Peat" 'If soil contains 15 to 29%plus No.200 soil in color,and organic in odor add"with sand"or "with gravel", whichever is predominant. LIf soil contains>30%plus No.200, SIEVE,4NALvsIS ropredominantly sand,add "sandy"to FSeeenoV. rn>� rosea-1 ELS60:2011104d fu ESOLOILBOLOO ,m�.,. name. >i a®nee drev. reegroup 0 M11soil contains>30%plus No.200, ,1,1■������������ Eaeemd'A Oro ,Elniell111111 predominantly gravel,add " velly" ■.■II.-1 --- Horizontal QTS=4 to L1=25.5. l; m ,� to group name. Equation atr.Ee illiPl>4 and plots on or above"A"line. ����' °o' MIMI a �stU.=u M-',�� .■ °PI<4 or plots below"A"line. o ®IIIIIM��� I�E�b F PI plots on or above"A"line. •111�i..au•1 t ,� ,.■■■■Alling...... °PI plots below"A"line. re d0,1u1 '�=Z.s,,.,, MN m RFiber Content description shown below. 3'u111■•111i\11\I 0.=0.575,mm '0 .��► 1111•■•■■U■1,o iiof« iiiii 1a02 .1111.111 .m. . le 5.. 11 05.. 5i. .�O 10 16 20 30 40 50 BO 70 BO 90 .100 110 PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS LIQUID MOT(LL) c"t'oms'" Qe�Da=aors 75-5.6 Plasticity Chart ADDITIONAL TERMINOLOGY NOTES USED BY AET FOR SOIL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION Grain Size Gravel Percentages Consistency of Plastic Soils Relative Density of Non-Plastic Soils Term Particle Size Term Perces Term N-Value.BPF :arm N-Value.BPF Boulders Over 12" A Little Gravel 3%-14% Very Soft less than 2 Very Loose 0-4 Cobbles 3"to 12" With Gravel 15%-29% Soft 2-4 Loose 5-10 Gravel #4 sieve to 3". Gravelly 30%-50% Firm 5 8 Medium Dense II-30 Sand #200 to#4 sieve Stiff 9-15 Dense 31-50 Fines(silt&clay) Pass#200 sieve Very Stiff 16-30 Very Dense Greater than 50 Hard Greater than 30 Moisture/Frost Condition Layering Notes Fiber Content of Peat Organic/Roots Description(if no lab tests) (MC Column) Laminations: Layers less than Fiber Content Soils are described as organic,if soil is not peat D(Dry): Absense of moisture,dusty,dry to Ys' thick of Term (Visual Estimate) and is judged to have sufficient organic fines touch. differing material content to influence the soil properties. Slightly M(Moist): Damp,although free water not or color. Fibric Peat: Greater than 67% organic used for borderline cases. visible. Soil may still have a high Hemic Peat: 33-67% water content(over"optimum"). Lenses: Pockets or layers Sapric Peat: Less than 33% With roots: Judged to have sufficient quantity W(Wet/ Free water visible intended to greater than Y2" of roots to influence the soil Waterbearing): describe non-plastic soils. thick of differing properties. Waterbearing usually relates to material or color. Trace roots: Small roots present,but not judged sands and sand with silt. to be in sufficient quantity to F(Frozen): Soil frozen significantly affect soil properties. 01CLS021(2/04) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. \ / i\ F \ / i.\\ dl gs / / ig \\ \ / \ • - \ I�and A Q N J \ , / 7 -' <2 / / r \\` 2 / U / — 58- t _/' ilki I 11 ( 1 50k5i S d v { , b ( �� & A TDM - 8-4-- c> \\\ FZtn1 of cetfaL, + t. u_g hesin. Roy. o ' � — :ass { r p N I PC rIm: `66(i.8 A Approx. saleI E ___.___ `�«3 14 F2avtr�� 1:3:7- tp 8--M -r`- ' r"/ l ®r: AL IF Ss-7 e 7 i 111 1 1 • L I 1 LL_L I .L� AAMERICAN Project: Summit Orthopedics AET Project No. ENGINEERING Eagan,Minnesota 01-06609 INC.TESTING, Subject: Site Layout and Approximate Boring Locations Date: 9/17/2015 Scale: None Drawn By: MPM Checked By: RLF Figure 1 1 _j_ a) O N f O p O. f / . 0 0 4 t, W , _ Q A • 1 1,..„,_.4: , : . 1 /if .i., , • .**"«,,,,..„, 17 CG CA "CS **ST" L7:,.... ce ..= U i t CJ O O 2 co 0 c o C) O2 °A 1 06 W v V] el Ir m m A CO W Co m • Q Ch p m [(j �__,T��.��+!=dQtf V `J]•J T 0 CA r U U AZ y i O ' V Z Z ""Imo! V ...1W W dWH 1 A III. 1 I ry 4 AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG • ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. Emou AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-1 (p. 1 of 2) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Surface Elevation: 875.3 Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241447 E 538530 DEPTHSAMPLE REC FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS IN FEET FEETELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC TSE IN. WC DEN LL PL Yo-#200 \ 875.1 FILL,mostly silty sand,a little gravel, i FILL • 1 874.3 trace roots,dark brown 10 M SS 6 ,FILL, mostly pieces of concrete 873'3 2 FILL,mostly silty sand,a little gravel, :.1:• . COARSE \trace roots,dark brown / .'..>,'. ALLUVIUM 6 M SS 14 : 3 — SILTY SAND,a little gravel,fine 4 • 871.3 grained,brown,moist,loose(SM) ;:. • SAND WITH SILT,a little gravel,fine 5 — to medium grained,brown,moist, loose \l (SP-SM) •• • 8 M X SS 12 6 — 868.8 /` 7 SAND,a little gravel,medium to fine :::.:.: g grained,brown,moist,medium dense 8 — (SP) 12 M SS 12 9 866.3 SAND,fine to medium grained,brown, 10— moist,medium dense(SP) 11 M SS 12 11 — 863.8 12— SAND,a little gravel,fine grained, brown,moist,medium dense(SP) 18 M SS 14 13 — 14— 15 — 13 M SS 16 16— e> 1 17 — 1 18 857.3 SAND, a little gravel,medium to fine r' 19— grained, brown,moist,medium dense v. (SP) o 20— 0 19 M SS 16 c� • 21 — U 22 23 — °' 851.3 24 SAND,fine to medium grained,light brown,moist,very dense(SP) . o DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO w o oSAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER THE ATTACHED 0 0-34W 3.25" HSA DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL aSHEETS FOR AN W 9/ 4/15 2:05 36.0 34.5 36.0 None EXPLANATION OF LI, 1 BORING TERMINOLOGY ON o COMPLETED: 9/4/15 THIS LOG a DR: GH LG: SG Rig: 92 01-DHR-060 03/2011 • AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG ENGINEERING mom TESTING,INC. AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-1 (p.2 of 2) Project: Summit Orthopedics; 1-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241447 E 538530 DEPTHSAMPLE REC FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS IN ELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC TypE FEET FEET WC DEN LL PL %-#200 SAND,fine to medium grained,light COARSE 52 M X SS 16 26— brown,moist,very dense(SP) • • • •••••ALLUVIUM • (continued) .•• (continued) .••.• 27— 28 847.3 SAND,a little gravel,fine to medium 29— grained,light brown,moist,dense(SP) .• 30— :•:'• 43 M SS 16 31 — 32— 33 — ::-::•:•:: 34— 35— 37 M SS 14 36 839.3 END OF BORING U) CD CD 0. OC 0 0 0 00 0 z 0. 0 ce 01 03/2011 01-DHR-060 AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-2 (p. 1 of 2) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan, MN Surface Elevation: 880.4 Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241447 E 538676 DEPTHSAMPLE REC FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS IN ELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC FEET FEET TYPE IN. WC DEN LL PL %-#200 SILTY SAND,a little gravel,trace : : TOPSOIL OR _ roots,fine grained,dark brown,moist, FILL 3 M SS 16 1 878.9 very loose(SM)(possible fill) 2 878.4 SILTY SAND,a little gravel,fine \grained, COARSE ALLUVIUM brown,moist,veryloose(SM) 5 M SS 14 3 — SAND,a little gravel, fine to medium grained,brown,moist,loose(SP) 1 4 — 5 — 7 M SS 12 6— 1 I 7— 10 M SS 14 8— 9— 10— 8 M SS 14 11 — ig 12— 13 867.4 12 M X SS 14 SAND,a little gravel,fine grained, `\ 14— brown,moist,medium dense(SP) 1 1 15 — 15 M SS 12 16— 1 I17- 18 — 1 N 1 19—za 1 1- 20— 0 19 M SS 16 • 21 — 1 a 22 858.4 1 SAND,a little gravel,fine to medium 1 a 23 -grained,brown,moist,medium dense, 1 a. lenses and laminations of clayey sand 1 • 24— (SP) • 1 o DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO c $ SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER THE ATTACHED O• 0-39%' 3.25" HSA DATE MIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL 9/4/15 10:52 41.0 39.5 40.8 None SHEETS FOR AN u, EXPLANATION OF W 1- BORING TERMINOLOGY ON o COMPLETED: 9/4/15 - THIS LOG r' DR: GH LG: SC Rig: 92 03/2011 01-DHR-060 • AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-2 (p.2 of 2) Project: Summit Orthopedics; 1-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241447 E 538676 DEPTHFIELD&LABORATORY TESTS REC nsi ELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC SAMPLEryp FEET FEET WC DEN LL PL %-#200 SAND,a little gravel,fine to medium COARSE 18 M SS 16 26— grained,brown,moist,medium dense, ALLUVIUM lenses and laminations of clayey sand :•:•::•:.:: (continued) 27 — (SP)(continued) 28 — 29— 30— 22 M SS 14 31 — :•::".:: .•.-• .•••••• 32— • • 847.4 33 SAND,a little gravel,fine to medium 34— grained,brown,moist,medium dense, .••••• lenses of lean clay and silt(SP) • 35 — ••• :.:•::.:••: 30 M SS 18 36— • • : • 37— 38 842.4 SAND WITH SILT,a little gravel,fine 39— grained,brown,moist,dense,lenses of silty sand(SP-SM) .•.• 40— ••••• 42 M SS 18 41 .• 839.4 •••• ' • END OF BORING I.0 9 Iti 03/2011 01-DHR-060 AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. Emus AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-3 (p. 1 of 2) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Surface Elevation: 884.2 Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241365 E 538611 DEPTHSAMPLE REC FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS IN ELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC FEET FEET TYPE IN. WC DEN LL PL %-#200 FILL,mostly silty sand,a little gravel, FILL 1 — trace roots,brown and dark brown 18 M / SS 12 882.7 2 — FILL,mostly silty sand,a little gravel, dark brown 3 — 24 M A SS 10 880.2 4 4 SAND WITH SILT,a little gravel,fine COARSE i to medium grained,brown,moist, ' ALLUVIUM 5 — medium dense to loose(SP-SM) 14 M SS 14 6— 1 II 7— 7 M • SS 12 8 9— to— 9 M SS 12 11 — 872.7 12— SAND,a little gravel,fine grained, brown,moist, medium dense(SP) 12 M SS 12 13— 14— 15 — • 16 M SS 14 16— 17 867.2 SAND,a little gravel,fine to medium 18— grained,brown,moist,medium dense (SP) 19— 0 20— 29 M x SS 16 J0 • • / \ 21 — e� CL 22 862.2 j SAND,a little gravel, fine grained, 1 tri+• 23 — brown,moist,dense,lenses of clayey 1 sand(SP) 24— j R o DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO re oSAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER THE ATTACHED 0 0-39'Vz 3.25" HSA DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL z SHEETS FOR AN w 9/4/15 9:20 41.0 39.5 40.2 None w EXPLANATION OF w BORING TERMINOLOGY ON o COMPLETED: 9/4/15 THIS LOG i a DR: GH LG: SC Rig: 92 01-DHR 060 03/2011 AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. mom AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-3 (p.2 of 2) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241365 E 538611 DEPTHSAMPLE RECINFIELD&LABORATORY TESTS FEETELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC FEET WC DEN LL PL %-#20( SAND,a little gravel,fine grained, •- COARSE 41 M SS- 16 26— brown,moist,dense,lenses of clayey ALLUVIUM sand(SP) (continued) (continued) 27— 28 — 29— 30— • 33 M SS 18 31 — 32— 33 851.2 1 SAND,fine to medium grained,brown, 34— moist,dense(SP) 35 — 46 M SS 16 36— 37 847.2 SAND WITH SILT, fine grained, • 38— brown,moist,very dense(SP-SM) • • • 39— • 40— • • 66 M SS 18 41 843.2 END OF BORING N m J WSJ > v a. a 0 K O O J W 03/2011 01-DHR-060 AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG . • ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. mom AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-4 (p. 1 of 2) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Surface Elevation: 883.4 Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241258 E 538530 DEPTHSAMPLE REC FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS INELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC FEET FEET TYPE WC DEN LL PL 3'o-#200 FILL,mostly silty sand,a little gravel, FILL OR 1 — trace roots,dark brown and brown TOPSOIL 7 M SS 16 2 881.4 FILL,mostly sand with silt and gravel, FILL OR trace roots,brown(may be natural soil) COARSE 18 M SS 10 3 — ALLUVIUM 4 879.4 SAND WITH SILT,a little gravel,fine -; COARSE 878.4 to medium grained,light brown,moist, ALLUVIUM 5 medium dense(SP-SM) 23 M SS 12 6— SAND,a little gravel,medium to fine grained,brown,moist,medium dense 7— (SP) 18 M SS 14 8 — 10— 21 M x SS 12 11 — 871.9 • /\ 12— SAND,fine to medium grained,brown, moist,medium dense(SP) 25 M SS 14 13 — 14— 15 — 28 M SS 14 16- 17— 18- 19— °' 20— O 18 M SS 16 ° • 21 — U 22— tu • 23 — 0 0 24— o DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO w °oSAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER HE ATTACHED 0 0-34W 3.25" HSA DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL 9/3/15 1:23 36.0 34.5 35.6 None SHEETS FOR AN EXPLANATION OF w 3 - ce BORING TERMINOLOGY ON o• COMPLETED: 9/3/15 THIS LOG a DR: GH LG: SC Rig: 92 01-DHR-060 03/2011 AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. MEM AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-4 (p.2 of 2) Project: Summit Orthopedics; 1-494 &Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241258 E 538530 DEPTH SAMPLE REC FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS IN ELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC S FEET FEET TE WC DEN LL PL %-#200 SAND,fine to medium grained,brown, COARSE 18 M SS 14 26 — moist,medium dense(SP)(continued) '• ALLUVIUM (continued) 27 — 28 855.4 SAND WITH GRAVEL,fine to 29— medium grained,light brown,moist, medium dense(SP) 30 — • 26 M SS 10 31 — 32— 33 — 34 849.4 •r SAND WITH SILT,fine grained, 35— brown,moist,dense,lenses of silty sand : (SP-SM) 34 M SS 10 • 36 847.4 END OF BORING CD ❑ J F.. a w a_ a of co ❑ O O U Z❑ a O 03/2011 01-DHR-060 AMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG . A ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. mom AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-5 (p. 1 of 2) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan MN Surface Elevation: 887.8 Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241258 E 538676 FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS DEPTH SAMPLE REC FEET FEET MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC T ypg IN. WC DEN LL PL %-#200 FILL,mostly silty sand,a little gravel, FILL OR 886.8 trace roots,dark brown and brown(may . TOPSOIL 4 M SS 18 1 \be natural soil) /:` CCO• LARSV UM 2 885.8 SILTY SAND,fine grained,brown, \/ `moist,very loose(SM) I••:: 13 M X SS 10 3 — SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL,fine to /\ 8843 ,memediumdium grainedense(SMd,gr) I ayish brown,moist, 4— SAND,a little gravel,fine to medium \/ 5 — grained,brown,moist,medium dense 15 M x SS 12 (SP) / \ 6- 7- 13 M SS 10 8- 9 878.8 SAND,fine grained,brown,moist, 10— medium dense(SP) 11 M SS 12 11 — 876.3 12— SAND,a little gravel,fine to medium grained,brown,moist medium dense 13 M SS 14 13— (SP) 14— 15 — 16 M SS 14 16— 17— 18 u, 19— °' 20— 23 M SS 16 0 li21 — U 22 W 23 864.8 SAND,a little gravel,medium to fine grained,brown,moist,medium dense to 0 _• 24 dense(SP) zs o DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO cc o SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER THE ATTACHED o DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL 0 0-391/ 2' 3.25" HSA None SHEETS FOR AN 9/3/15 2:45 41.0 39.5 41.0 EXPLANATION OF W J W TERMINOLOGY ON .x BORING THIS LOG o COMPLETED: 9/3/15 0: . DR: GH LG: SC Rig: 92 - 01-DHR-06( 03/2011 AMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. mom AET No: Al-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-5 (p.2 of 2) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241258 E 538676 DEPTHSAMPLE REC FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS FEET ELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC Ty'E �' FEET WC DEN LL PL Y0-#200 SAND,a little gravel,medium to fine •: COARSE 28 M " _ SS 14 grained,brown,moist,medium dense to : ALLUVIUM 26 dense(SP)(continued) .:.; (continued) 1 27— 28 — i 1 29 — 1 30 — 26 M Ai SS 16 31 — i 32 — 1 33 — 1 34 — 1 35 — 25 M • SS 14 36— 1 37 1 38 — 1 39 — 1 40— 43 M A SS 16 846.8 • 41 END OF BORING I aiC 0 0 -j J W 0 U W Q a 0 of 0 m '43 0 0 ix0 0 0 U >C W J W 3 rea 0 o a 03/2011 01-DHR-060 AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG • ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. immi AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-6 (p. 1 of 1) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Surface Elevation: 886.5 Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241134 E 538602 DEPTH SAMPLE REC FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS FEET FEE MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC TYPE IN. WC DEN LL PL %-#200 FILL,mostly silty sand,a little gravel, FILL 1 885.5 trace roots,dark brown 9 M SS 18 FILL,mostly silty sand,a little gravel, 2 884.5 of bituminous,ashes/cinders, \trace roots,dark brown • COARSE ALLUVIUM 37 M SS 12 3 — SAND,a little gravel,fine to medium grained,brown,moist,dense to medium -........• i 4 — dense(SP) 5 — 28 M SS 12 6 880.0 1 SAND WITH SILT,a little gravel,fine 1 7 — to medium grained,brown,a little dark 8 — brown,moist,medium dense(SP-SM) 25 M SS 14 9 877.5 SAND WITH SILT,a little gravel,fine 10— to medium grained,brown,moist, 11 M X SS 14 medium dense(SP-SM) • •• 11 875.0 12— SAND,a little gravel,fine to medium grained,brown,moist,medium dense 12 M XSS 12 13 — (SP) 14 872.5 SAND,a little gravel,fine grained, 15 871.5 brown,moist,loose(SP) r 9 M SS 16 \SAND,a little gravel,medium grained, 16— light grayish brown,moist,loose(SP) 17— 18 868.5 SAND,a little gravel,fine to medium 19— grained,light grayish brown,moist, medium dense(SP) \/ • 20— o 13 M �( SS 14 o 865.5 / gl 21 END OF BORING LI. U Q a 0 of 0 m o DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO re o SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER THE ATTACHED ° DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL • 0-19W 3.25" HSA SHEETS FOR AN 9/3/15 12:00 21.0 19.5 19.8 None W W EXPLANATION OF J 3 22 BORING TERMINOLOGY ON o COMPLETED: 9/3/15 THIS LOG • DR: GH LG: SC Rig: 92 01 DHR 060 03/2011 AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. mama AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-7 (p. 1 of 1) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Surface Elevation: 880.4 Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 240969 E 538653 DEPTHSAMPLE REC FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS IN ELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC FEET FEET TYPE IN' WC DEN LL PL 'Vo-#200 879.9 FILL,mostly silty sand,a little gravel, FILL 1 – \trace roots,dark brown / COARSE 5 M X SS 16 SAND WITH SILT,a little gravel,trace • • ALLUVIUM 2 878.4roots,fine grained,brown,moist,loose ]:•]:]•: — `(SP-SM) /:': 29 M SS 16 3 – SAND WITH SILT,a little gravel,fine 876 4 to medium grained,brown,moist, 4 \medium dense(SP-SM) / • •• SILTY SAND,a little gravel,fine to 5 – medium grained,brown,moist,medium 27 M SS 14 dense to dense(SM) 8 – 35 M ]( SS 16 10 - 34 M X SS 14 11 869.4 //�\ SAND WITH SILT,a little gravel,fine 12– to medium grained,grayish brown, • moist,dense to very dense(SP-SM) • \/ 13 – 38 M X SS 16 14– /` 15 – 51 M SS 14 16 864.4 : : END OF BORING N_ to O' 1-- 0 0 CI .J sJW t a U H Q `8 9 o DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO 0o SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER THE ATTACHED O 0-14'/z' 3.25" HSA DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL 9/3/15 10:40 16.0 14.5 15.3 None SHEETS FOR AN w EXPLANATION OF a TERMINOLOGY ON o COMPETED: 9/3/15 a DR: GH LG: SC Rig: 92 THIS LOG 03/2011 01-DHR 060 AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG - ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. SB-8 (p. 1 of 1) Project: Summit Orthopedics; 1-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Surface Elevation: 879.9 Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241372 E 538460 FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS DEPTH ELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC SAMPLE REC FEET FEET TYPE IN. WC DEN LL PL %-#200 SILTY SAND,trace roots,fine grained, : TOPSOIL 1 — black to dark brown,moist,loose(SM) 5 M X SS 14 878.4 SILTY SAND,fine grained,dark brown :• COARSE _ 2— 877.4 to brown,moist,loose(SM) r ALLUVIUM 3 — SAND,a Iittle gravel,fine to medium 7 M SS 12 grained,brown,moist,loose(SP) 4— 5 — •• 9 M SS 14 6 873.4 1 SAND WITH SILT,fine to medium 1 7_ grained,brown,moist,medium dense 8 (SP-SM) 11 M • SS 12 9— • • 1 10— 14 M SS 12 11 — II 12— 16 M SS 14 13 — 14— 15— 18 M SS 14 16 863.9 • ' END OF BORING U S f- 0 U' JWS + + 0 of 0 o DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO w o o SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WA THE ATTACHED o DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL O 0-14'/Z' 3.25" HSA SHEETS FOR AN 9/4/15 12:07 16.0 14.5 15.7 None w J EXPLANATION OF W 3 TERMINOLOGY ON 22 BORING COMPLETED: 9/4/15 _ THIS LOG tu-a DR: GH LG: SC Rig: 92 01-DHR-060 03/2011 • AAMERICAN LOG OF HAND AUGER BORING ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. HAB-9 (p.1 of 1) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494 &Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Surface Elevation: Est.854 Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241017 E 538513 DEPTH ELEV. SAMPLE REC FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS IN MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC FEET FEET TYPE N. WC DEN LL PL HCP SILTY SAND,a little gravel,trace : '..: SLOPEWASH M — HAB 10 2,000 roots, fine grained,dark brown(SM) 1 – ,'. M =- HAB 12 3,000 2 – M = HAB 12 3,000 3 – _. M =- HAB 12 3,000 4 – = M = HAB 10 3,000 5 – M = HAB 12 4,000 6 SAND,a little gravel,fine to medium : COARSE grained,brown,moist(SP) ALLUVIUM M = HAB 12 4,000 7 END OF BORING -Fr- ..7 n 0 CD J I a. a. ai 0 0 m o DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTSLt NOTE: REFER TO 0 0DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER THE ATTACHED O 0-7' HAB DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL > SHEETS FOR AN w EXPLANATION OF BORING TERMINOLOGY ON o COMPLETED: 9/9/15 ai DR: RJO LG: - Rig: - THIS LOG 03/2011 01-DHR-060 AAMERICAN SUBSURFACE BORING LOG • ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. mum AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. HAB-10 (p. 1 of 1) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494&Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Surface Elevation: Est.847 Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241083 E 538444 FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS D INN ELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC SAMPLE EI C PID FEET FEET WC DEN LL PL (ppm) SILTY SAND,a little gravel,trace • _ SLOPEWASH M � HAB 1,500 roots,fine grained,dark brown and black :• : I – (SM) - - HAB 2,000 2 – M _ HAB 3,000 3 SILTY SAND,trace roots,fine grained, TOPSOIL OR — 3,000 black(SM) - -' • SLOPEWASH M — HAB 4 — - M = HAB 4,000 5 – - M = HAB 4,000 6– — M HAB 4,000 7– SAND WITH SILT,a little gravel,fine COARSE UM4,000 to medium grained,brown,moist,lenses :: M = HAB \and laminations of sandy silt(SP-SM) / END OF BORING • U) m 1- 0 (9 J 0 U H W Q 2 O. °o' m m 4 o DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO o o o DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER THE ATTACHED 0 0-7W HAB DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL z Q SHEETS FOR AN ` w EXPLANATION OF re BORING TERMINOLOGY ON o COMPLETED: 9/9/15 THIS LOG i a DR: JRO LG: - Rig: 01-DHR-060 03/2011 . A AMERICAN LOG OF HAND AUGER BORING ENGINEERING TESTING,INC. AET No: 01-06609 Log of Boring No. HAB-11 (p. 1 of 1) Project: Summit Orthopedics; I-494 &Pilot Knob Road; Eagan,MN Surface Elevation: Est.860 Dakota Co.Coordinates: N 241183 E 538410 DEPTHSAMPLE REC FIELD&LABORATORY TESTS IN ELEV. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION GEOLOGY N MC TYPE IN FEET FEET WC DEN LL PL HCP SILTY SAND,a little gravel,trace :.ti:' TOPSOIL OR M _ HAB 2,000 roots, fine grained,dark brown and black : :'': SLOPEWASH I — (SM) ::i M = HAB 2,500 2 - M = HAB 3,000 3 SAND WITH SILT AND GRAVEL, : COARSE _ possible cobbles, fine to medium •: ALLUVIUM M = HAB 3,500 4 \grained,brown,moist(SP-SM) / END OF BORING-OBSTRUCTED HAB @ 4' I- 0 0 J wsJ + 0 0 a. 0 a, of 0 <o m 9 0 m oDEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO o - o SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER THE ATTACHED 0 00-4' HAB DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL LEVEL a SHEETS FOR AN w EXPLANATION OF cc BORING 9/9/15 TERMINOLOGY ON ra 1 DR: JRO LG: - Rig: - THIS LOG 03/2011 01-DHR-060 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review Summit Orthopedics;1-494&Pilot Knob Road;Eagan,MN AMERICAN September 21,2015 ENGINEERING Report No.01-06609 TESTING,INC. Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use y h Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. 01-06609 B.1 REFERENCE This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks relating to subsurface problems which are caused by construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. This information was developed and provided by ASFE',of which,we are a member firm. B.2 RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION B.2.1 Geotechnical Services are Performed for Specific Purposes,Persons,and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer.Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. No one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it.And no one,not even you,should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. B.2.2 Read the Full Report Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. B.2.3 A Geotechnical Engineering Report is Based on A Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique,project-specific factors when establishing the scope of a study. Typically factors include:the client's goals, objectives, and risk management preferences;the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration;the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements,such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates otherwise,do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored,or • completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure,as when it's changed from a parking garage to an office building,or from a light industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse, • elevation,configuration,location,orientation,or weight of the proposed structure, • composition of the design team,or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes, even minor ones, and request an assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed. B.2.4 Subsurface Conditions Can Change A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have been affected by:the passage of time;by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. 1 ASFE,8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106,Silver Spring,MD 20910 Telephone:301/565-2733:www.asfe.org Appendix B—Page 1 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING,INC , r Appendix B Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. 01-06609 B.2.5 Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional Opinions Site exploration identified subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site.Actual subsurface conditions may differ,sometimes significantly,from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. B.2.6 A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction observation. B.2.7 A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to Misinterpretation Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your geotechnical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report.Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications.Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences,and by providing construction observation. B.2.8 Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings.Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable,but recognizes that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. B.2.9 Give Contractors a.Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give contractors the complete geotechnical engineering report,but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In the letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited;encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report(a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. B.2.10 Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines.This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappointments,claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their report. Sometimes labeled "limitations" many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions.Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. B.2.11 Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a geoenvironmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoenvironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk management guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else. Appendix B—Page 2 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING,INC For Office Use Permit#: � 76 7 Permit Fee: Q amu. 9 Date Received: 7 " 1P/ 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD I EAGAN, MN 55122-1810 '� (651)675-56751 TDD: (651)454-85351 FAX: (651)675-5694 C � w _� Staff: buddinqinspections(@cityofeagan.com JUL 15 2019 CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM INSPECTIONS PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 7/10/19 Site Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Dr. Eagan, MN 55123 Tenant: Summit Orthopedics Suite#: Property Owner Name: MSP Commercial Phone: 651-287-8204 Name: Gilbert Mechanical License#: 058808-Pm Contractor Address: 5251 W. 74th St. City: Edina State: MN Zip: 55439 Phone: 952-835-3810 Email: koneill@gilbertmech.com New Replacement Repair Rebuild Type of Work Description of work: Rebuilt (4) RPZs for the following serial numbers: 08015, 08064, 08069, and 58367. COMMERCIAL Irrigation System( yes/_no)( RPZ/_PVB) Permit Type • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems • Avg.GPM (2"turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Avg.GPM High demand devices?_Yes_No Flushometers_Yes_No Permit Fee$60.00 You may subscribe to receive an electronic notification from the City of proposed ordinances by signing up for an email update on the City's website at www.citvofeagan.com/subscribe. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at(651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate;that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan;that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit,and work is not to start without a permit;that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. X Natalie Nord, on behalf of RPZ tester:John Galles X `� Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature 1 For Office Use*s - § 4 Permit#: 45--7 pc C20Permit Fee: Date Received: 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD I EAGAN, MN 55122-1810 (651)675-5675 I TDD: (651)454-8535 I FAX: (651)675-5694 Staff: buildinginspectionsa.citvofeagan.com L CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM INSPECTIONS PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 8/8/19 Site Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Dr. Tenant: Summit Orthopedics Suite#: Property Owner Name: MSP Commercial Phone: 651-287-8204 Name: Gilbert Mechanical License#: 058808-PM Contractor Address: 5251 W. 74th St. City: Edina State: MN Zip: 55439 Phone: 952-835-3810 Email: koneill@gilbertmech.corn New Replacement Repair ✓ Rebuild Type of Work Description of work: Rebuilt RPZ, serial #11564 COMMERCIAL Irrigation System( yes/_no)(1 RPZ/_PVB) Permit Type • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems • Avg.GPM (2"turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Avg.GPM High demand devices?_Yes_No Flushometers_Yes_No Permit Fee$60.00 You may subscribe to receive an electronic notification from the City of proposed ordinances by signing up for an email update on the City's website at www.citvofeagan.com/subscribe. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at(651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate;that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan;that I understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit,and work is not to start without a permit;that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x Natalie Nord, on behalf of Kristin O'neill Applicant's Printed Name Applicant's Signature For Office Use , ', t.% , 1.... , .,,,,,,'k: 'oe',,,,, E REcEi-vEr, Pemtit Fee: 6e0, iC32- m:::::::::", -4—.. Date Received: 3--/1-ez 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD 1 EAGAN, MN 55122-1810 MAR ii 2020 , (651)675-5675 I TDD:(651)454-8535 I FAX:(651)675-5694 Staff: 1 buildinginspectionsecityofeagan.com L 7 , CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM INSPECTIONS PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 2/10/2020 Site Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Dr. Tenant: Summit Ortho Suite#: Propetly Owner Name: Summit Ortho Phone: (612) 799-2591 , ,... . . Name: Gilbert Mechanical058808PM License#: Contractor 5251 W 74th St City: MN Edina Address: State: Zip: 55124 Phone: (952) 893-2147 Email: koneill@gilbertmech.com , -, , - -• , • , New Replacement Repair L Rebuild Type4irw0* Complete Rebuild of RPZ serial#08069. ' - Description of work: ,., , .., . COMMERCIAL ' - Irrigation System( .yes 4,no)(1 RPZ/ PVB) Permit • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems • Avg.GPM (2"turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Avg.GPM High demand devices? Yes Z.No Flushometers Yes LNo Permit Fee $60.00 You may subscribe to receive an electronic notification from the City of proposed ordinances by signing up for an email update on the City's website at www.citvofeanan.com/sutracribe. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at(651)454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate;that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan;that I understand this is not a permit,but only an application for a permit,and work is not to start without a permit;that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. Aiie /1 s (iff „.., x Kristin O'Neill x 0, 4 pplicant's Printed Name A 'Miica• ": SignatuV A 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD I EAGAN, MN 55122-1810 (651) 675-5675 I TDD: (651) 454-8535 I FAX: (651) 675-5694 buildinginsaectionsto'�.cfirofeaaan.com 4 For Office Us / - Permit #: li7 d9-�],j `" Permit Fee: 1#0eri Date Received: Staff: L CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM INSPECTIONS PERMIT APPLICATION Date: 6/29/20 Site Address: 2620 Eagan Woods Drive Tenant: Summit Ortho Suite #: Name: Summit Orthopedics Phone: (612) 393-3184 J Name: Gilbert Mechanical License #: 058808-PM Address: 5251 West 74th St city: Edina State: MN Zip: 55439 Phone: (952) 935-3810 Email: koneill@gilbertmech.com _ New _ Replacement _ Repair Rebuild Description of work: Installed new rubbers on RPZ serial #08064, 1/2" Watts COMMERCIAL Irrigation System ( yes / It no) (11( RPZ / _ PVB) • Rain sensors required on irrigation systems • Avg. GPM (2" turbo required unless smaller size allowed by Public Works) Avg. GPM High demand devices? _Yes _No Flushometers Yes _No Permit Fee $60.00 You may subscribe to receive an electronic notification from the City of proposed ordinances by signing up for an email update on the City's website at www.citvofeagan.com/subscribe. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. Call Gopher State One Call at (651) 454-0002 for protection against underground utility damage. I hereby acknowledge that this information is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes of the City of Eagan; that understand this is not a permit, but only an application for a permit, and work is not to start without a permit; that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan in the case of work which requires a review and approval of plans. x Kristin O'Neill Applicant's Printed Name