No preview available
 /
     
05/10/2016 - City Council SpecialSPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2016 5:30 P.M. EAGAN ROOM EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER AGENDA I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA II. VISITORS TO BE HEARD III. INTRODUCTION OF LUTHER WYNDER, MVTA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR IV. DAKOTA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE UPDATE V. WINTER TRAIL MAINTENANCE VI. PUBLIC WORKS 5-YEAR CIP (2017-2021) VII. TRANSPORTATION, UTILITIES, WATER QUALITY PLAN UPDATES VIII. OTHER BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT Agenda Information Memo May 10, 2016, Eagan Special City Council Meeting III. Introduction of Luther Wynder, Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA) Executive Director Action To Be Considered: No action is required. Mr. Wynder will be attending the Council workshop to introduce himself in his new role as Executive Director of the MVTA. Facts: ➢ Luther Wynder (Wine-der) joined the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA) on April 4 as the agency’s second Executive Director. ➢ He was previously Chief Performance Officer (CPO) for the Delaware Transit Corporation (DART), a statewide agency that provides fixed route, paratransit, and commuter rail service across the State of Delaware and into Philadelphia. At DART, he sat on a five- member Executive Leadership team. He joined Delaware Transit in January 2005. ➢ Wynder has an MBA, a Master’s Degree in Information Systems Technology, and a Bachelor’s Degree in Management. ➢ Wynder was invited to the May 10 Special City Council meeting to introduce himself to the City Council and viewing public. Attachments: (0) None Agenda Information Memo May 10, 2016, Eagan Special City Council Meeting IV. Dakota County Sheriff’s Office Update Action To Be Considered: No action is required. Sheriff Tim Leslie will provide an update to the City Council on the happenings within the Dakota County Sheriff’s Office. Facts: ➢ Since being elected Dakota County Sheriff in 2015, Tim Leslie has appeared before the County’s City Councils and Township Boards to highlight and discuss the current efforts within the Sheriff’s Office. ➢ Sheriff Leslie is the 20th Sheriff in the history of Dakota County. ➢ Prior to serving as Sheriff, he was the Chief Deputy of the Dakota County Sheriff’s Office from 2010-2015. He served as the Assistant Commissioner of Public Safety from 2003- 2010. ➢ Sheriff Leslie will appear before the Mayor and Council and make a brief PowerPoint presentation (approximately 20 minutes in length). ➢ The presentation is for the Council’s awareness only. No action required. Attachments: (1)  IV-1 Power Point, Sheriff’s Office Update Efficient, Effective, Responsive Services Department Dakota County Sheriff’s Office 1 Efficient, Effective, Responsive Services Provided Patrol - Parks, Lakes, and Trails - Canine Unit - Dive Team Investigations - Fraud - Electronic Crime Task Force - Minnesota Joint Analysis Center - Metro Regional Information Center - School Resource Officers Narcotics - Dakota County Drug Task Force - Drug Enforcement Administration Permit to Carry Jail - Inmate Programs - Jail Roster Search Court Security - Point of Entry Screening Prisoner Transport Records and Warrants - Warrant Search and Entry Civil and Warrants -Home Foreclosure Search -Arrest Warrant Efforts MAAG & Crisis Negotiation Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 3 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 4 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 5 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 6 Grant: $200,000 for 2 years (2015-2016) Partners: 360 Communities and Minnesota Coalition for Battered Women Purpose: to investigate misdemeanor domestic related offenses to prevent future offenses by forensically investigating crimes committed via technology Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) Grant January 1, through September 30, 2015 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 7 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) Grant January 1, through September 30, 2015 Total cases w orked: 59 Total suspects identified: 49 Total domestic/assault and related counts these suspect have been charged with: 229 Total domestic/assault & related convictions these suspects have: 137 Total phones, computers and other media searched: 221 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 8 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 9 5218 4388 3856 3684 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Civil Papers Processed 2012 - 2015 -3.8% Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 10 2012 955 2013 910 2014 909 2015 884 OFP’s & OFH’s YTD Q3 2012 - 2015 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 11 3991 4314 4428 6373 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Warrants Entered 2012 to 2015 7.9% 2.6% 8.1% Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 12 659 473 517 570 1464 4726 5001 4550 4600 4650 4700 4750 4800 4850 4900 4950 5000 5050 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Warrants Worked Outstanding Warrants 1.1.15 Outstanding Warrants 11.30.15 Warrants Worked 2011 - 2015 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 13 133 147 162 243 203 184 218 282 216 238 307 951 666 554 1 2 6 3 1 1 1 5 1 4 5 9 2 5 0 7 3 4 6 6 2 2 0 1 2 8 6 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Purchase Renew New Gun Permit Applications 2009 - 2015 Efficient, Effective, Responsive Gun Permits ~ In 2015, Dakota County was second in the state behind Hennepin for applications with 3,414. We denied 30 or 0.8%. ~ Dakota County has 14,954 active permits as of January 1, 2016 (7.1% of entire state permit holders). ~ The State of Minnesota has 209,977 active permits as of January 1, 2016. Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 15 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 16 263.6 257.5 281.0 248.6 269.7 258.5 26 29 34 38 40 36 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Average Daily Jail Population Average Daily Boarded Jail Capacity Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 17 23.73 28.82 31.98 32.06 37.76 33.99 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average Daily Female Inmates Boarding 2010 - 2015 2015 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 18 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 $900,000 $1,000,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $448,480 $716,158 $759,952 $874,765 $911,133 $819,115 Inmate Boarding Costs Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 19 DCSO Bookings (4514) 694 575 509 489 422 376 347 284 214 135 74 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Eagan Bville SSP Has WSP AV Lville IGH Rmt Farm MH 2015 Bookings by Dakota County Law Enforcement Agencies Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 20 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 21 Efficient, Effective, Responsive 2015 Highlights 22 TRIAD LEC Lobby Work Station Efficient, Effective, Responsive Significant Changes to Budget 2012-2016 •Added 4.0 FTEs in 2015 for Court Security •2016 increased revenue funded overtime $100k •2014 Amendment to cover Inmate Boarding. $237K •Increased 2015 and 2016 budget $116k to cover Inmate Boarding going forward. 23 Efficient, Effective, Responsive Sheriff’s Office Expense Budget History 24 Efficient, Effective, Responsive Looking Ahead 2016 •Continue focus and coordinating efforts toward the goal of reducing outstanding arrest warrants. Added 1.0 FTE to the US Marshal’s Fugitive Task Force •Continue to research and implement technology to increase efficiency and effectiveness. License plate readers at Hastings, drones, body cameras. •Implement the Lethality Assessment into our operations. •Create a TRIAD chapter in Dakota County working with each city connecting seniors with resources in law enforcement and in the community. 25 Agenda Information Memo May 10, 2016 Special City Council Workshop V. Winter Trail Maintenance Direction For Consideration: Review and comment on potential additions/revisions to the Winter Trail Maintenance program and direct any modifications to the June 7, 2016, regular Council meeting for formal action. Facts:  In 1998, the City Council adopted a Winter Trail Maintenance Plan that allows the Council to annually review and reconsider the extent of the trail system that is designated for maintenance during the winter months. This review has been directed to be performed at the first available workshop after April 1 each year.  The winter trail maintenance program began by incorporating 56 miles of a 110 mile trail system to be completed utilizing contractual services.  As the City's trail system has continued to grow along with the public's acceptance of the program, the program has been reviewed almost annually to respond to new trail construction and petitioned requests for added segments to be maintained.  Subsequent City Councils have added approximately 21.1 miles of trails (average of 1.3 miles/year) to the original system plan in response to citizen and business requests, as well as considering the merits of each new segment of trail constructed during the previous year along collector/arterial roads.  The current program consists of 77.1 maintained miles out of a total 123.4 mile system (62.5%) and is maintained completely with City staff and equipment.  There are 2 Citizen Petitions (CP) and 2 New Trail (NT) segments that should be reviewed by the Council. Each request references the related justification and degree of compliance with the Council’s current Winter Trail Maintenance Policy. Attachments: (6) V.-1 Staff Memo V.-5 NT #1 Map V.-2 Overall Considerations Map V.-6 NT #2 Map V.-3 CP #1 Map V.-4 CP #2 Map MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS c/o DAVE OSBERG, CITY ADMINISTRATOR RUSS MATTHYS, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: TIM PLATH, TRANSPORTATION & OPERATIONS ENGINEER DATE: MAY 5, 2016 SUBJECT: WINTER TRAIL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL SEGMENTS In accordance with the City’s Winter Trail Maintenance Program, no public request for additions to the Winter Trail Maintenance Policy will be considered unless accompanied by a petition of 50 properties lying within ½ mile of the segment to be considered. All requests/petitions must be submitted in writing by April 1st. They will then be presented to the Council at the next available Council Workshop with formal action taken at a subsequent regular Council meeting for possible inclusion into the following season’s program. Two (2) Citizen Petition’s (CP) have been received since April 2015 and one (1) New Trail segment (NT) which will be constructed in 2016 are being presented for the Council’s consideration. CITIZEN PETITIONS (CP) 1. Citizen Petition/New Trail (CP #1) A Petition containing 3 signatures representing 2 businesses and 1 apartment complex was accepted as adequate by the Public Works Director on February 17, 2016, for two new trail segments. The petition is requesting that additional trail segments be considered for maintenance for the 2016-2017 season. Petitioners are requesting that a trail segment be plowed on the south side of Nicols Road from Rahn Road to Silver Bell Road and the access trail behind Jensen’s from Rahn Road to the parking lot at The Flats at Cedar Grove apartments. (see map) Rationale: Petitioners are requesting winter trail maintenance be added to create more convenient and safe paths for residents walking to and from the Twin Cities Premium Outlets. Option 1- South side of Nicols Road, from Rahn Road to Silver Bell Road, and access trail between businesses (as submitted) Additional segment quantities 1,095 feet (0.21 miles) (see map) Additional estimated annual cost $ 264 ($1,257/mile, 5-year average cost) Option 2- South side of Nicols Road, from Rahn Road to Silver Bell Road, (Trail segment adjacent to community collector only) Additional segment quantities 785 feet (0.15 miles) (see map) Additional estimated annual cost $ 189 ($1,257/mile, 5-year average cost) Option 2 Meets City Council's Winter Trail Maintenance Policy criteria number 2: Trails along Community Collectors. These are thoroughfare roads with 2 traffic lanes (with safety lanes/shoulders) or 4 full lanes of traffic with volumes greater than 3,000 vehicles per day and speed limits from 35-45 mph. Additional Related Factors: • These trail segments were installed in late-2015 and could have been submitted for the Council’s consideration as “New Trail” segments. Staff chose to forward as “Citizen Petition” segments to reflect formal requests by the adjacent property owners for inclusion in the Winter Trail Maintenance Program. • Provides connectivity – connects to existing trails that are currently maintained. • If added, these segment(s) would be included as a Priority Level 2 route. 2. Citizen Petition (CP #2) A Petition containing 79 signatures representing 74 Eagan properties was submitted on March 30, 2016. The petition is requesting that an additional trail segment be added for the 2016-2017 season. Petitioners are requesting that a portion of the Highline Trail, from Blackhawk Road to Pilot Knob Road, as well as a trail loop in Thomas Lake Park be plowed. This segment of trail is approximately 13,305 feet in length. (see map) Rationale: Petitioners are requesting winter trail maintenance be added for the health benefits of exercising outdoors and the reduction in noise pollution versus walking along busy county roadways. Additional segment quantities 13,305 feet (2.52 miles) (see map) Additional estimated annual cost $ 3,167 ($1,257/mile, 5-year average cost) Meets “Petition” Criteria set forth in Council Policy -Winter Maintenance of Sidewalk and Trailways (6/7/11): “Due to the cost and/or time to add additional segments to the overall maintenance program, it is necessary that a need and benefit be demonstrated to justify additions to the Winter Trail Maintenance system. Subsequently, no public request will be considered unless accompanied by a petition of at least 50 property owners or employees of businesses located within ½ mile of the segment to be considered.” Additional Related Factors: • The requested recreational trail segments are located primarily within Downing Park and Thomas Lake Park, which are neighborhood parks. • To date, the only recreational trail segments approved for winter maintenance are the 0.40 miles of trail at Central Park, a community park. • If added, this segment would be included as a Priority Level 4 route. NEW TRAILS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN 2016 (NT) 1. New Trail (NT #1) An 8-foot wide bituminous trail is planned to be constructed in 2016 on the northwest side of Cedar Grove Parkway from Rahn Road to Nicols Road/Silverbell Road. This segment of new trail is approximately 1,132 feet in length. (see map) Rationale: Newly constructed bituminous trail. Additional segment quantities 1,132 feet (0.21 miles) (see map) Additional estimated annual cost $ 263 ($1,257/mile, 5-year average cost) Meets City Council's Winter Trail Maintenance Policy criteria number 3: Trails along Neighborhood Collector Streets. These are local streets approximately 1 mile in length with 2 traffic lanes (with safety lanes/shoulders), traffic volumes less than 3,000 vehicles per day and speed limits of 35 mph or greater. Additional Related Factors: • The existing trail on the southeast side of Cedar Grove Parkway is currently included in the Winter Trail Maintenance program. Typically, trails on only one side of neighborhood and community collector roadways are included in the Winter Trail Maintenance Program. • Provides connectivity – connects to existing trails that are currently maintained. • If added, this segment would be included as a Priority Level 2 route. 2. New Trails- NT #2 An 8-foot wide bituminous trail is planned to be constructed in 2016 on the southeast side of Central Parkway from Yankee Doodle Road to Pilot Knob Road. This segment of new trail is approximately 2,700 feet in length. (see map) Rationale: Newly constructed bituminous trail. Additional segment quantities 1,132 feet (0.51 miles) (see map) Additional estimated annual cost $ 641 ($1,257/mile, 5-year average cost) Meets City Council's Winter Trail Maintenance Policy criteria number 2: Trails along Community Collectors. These are thoroughfare roads with 2 traffic lanes (with safety lanes/shoulders) or 4 full lanes of traffic with volumes greater than 3,000 vehicles per day and speed limits from 35- 45 mph. Additional Related Factors: • Provides connectivity – connects to existing trails that are currently maintained. • The existing trail on the northwest side of Central Parkway is currently included in the Winter Trail Maintenance program. Typically, trails on only one side of neighborhood and community collector roadways are included in the Winter Trail Maintenance Program. • If added, this segment would be included as a Priority Level 3 route. Please let me know if there is any additional information that would be helpful in considering the merits of adding any of these segments to the current Winter Trail Maintenance program. CP #1 CP #2 NT#1 NT#2 Date: 4/19/2016Prepared by: City of Eagan Street Dept., SPFile: L:\...\cm\streets\trails\plowrtes\16_17\8x11_routeconsiderations_16_17.mxd 0 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 Feet ´ Plowed In 2015-2016 Winter Trail & Sidewalk MaintenanceRoute Considerations for 2016-2017 Citizens Petition - CP #1,2 New Trail - NT #1,2 !( !( !( Silver Bell Road M N H w y 1 3 N i c o l s R d C e d a r G r o v e P k w y CP#1 1) Nicols Road - South Side Silv er Bell Rd to Rahn Rd 2) Acces s Trail be tw een J ens ens Suppe r C lub & C eda rvale Lanes R ahn R oad to The Flats Pe titioned Trail 0 180 360 Feet ± Request C P#1 for 2016-2017 Winter Trail Maintenance - Apr 4, 2016 Curr ently Plowed Segments Pe titioner Locations!(3 Signatures Representing 2 Businesses and 1 Apartment Complex Nicols Rd - 785 ftAccess Trail b/n businesses - 310 ft Winte r Trail Maintenanc e Petition Location !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( ! CP#2 Highline Trail - Bla ckhaw k Road to Pilot Knob Road & 1 .5 Mile Loop in Thomas Lake Park Petitioned Trail 0 1,900 3,800 Feet ± Request CP#2 for 2016-2017 Winter Trail Maintenance - Apr 4, 2016 Currently Plowed Segments Petitioner Locations!(79 Signatures Representing 74 Eagan Properties5 Outside of Eagan Properties Highline Trail - 1.72 MilesThomas Lake Park Loop (S Side) - 0.80 MilesTotal Petitioned Distance - 2.52 Winter Trail Maintenance Petition Location M N H w y 1 3 N i c o l s R d C e d a r G r o v e P k w y Rahn Road Silver Bell Road NT#1 Cedar Grove Par kway - N/W SideFrom Nicols Rd/Silver Bell Road to Rahn RoadWinter Trail Maintenance Consideration Location Consider ed for Plow ing (1 ,132 ft) 0 150 300 Feet ± Request NT#2 for 2016-2017 Winter Trail Maintenance - Apr 19, 2016 Currently Plowed Segments P i l o t K n o b R o a d Yank ee Doodle Road C e n t r a l P a r k w a y NT#2 Central Parkw ay - S/E SideFrom Pilot Knob Road to Yankee Doodle RoadWinter Trail Maintenance Consideration Location Consider ed for Plow ing (2 ,700 ft) 0 150 300 Feet ± Request NT#2 for 2016-2017 Winter Trail Maintenance - Apr 19, 2016 Currently Plowed Segments Agenda Information Memo May 10, 2016 Special City Council Workshop VI. Public Works Department 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan, 2017-2021 (Part III - Infrastructure) Direction For Consideration: Affirm (or Revise) the draft 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), Part III - Public Works Infrastructure, 2017-2021, and direct it to the June 7, 2016, regular Council meeting for formal consideration of adoption. Facts:  Every year, the City Council adopts a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the City that becomes the planning guide for programming and scheduling various capital improvements. It is comprised of three parts: o Part I - Major Community Facilities/Buildings o Part II - Major Equipment & Vehicles o Part III - Infrastructure (Parks & Public Works)  The Public Works Department has completed the preparation of its draft CIP, Part III (Public Works Infrastructure) for 2017 to 2021 and would like to review it with the Council and incorporate any comments or revisions before presenting it for formal consideration and adoption at a regular Council meeting.  A summary list and map of the proposed first year's programmed improvements (2017) are included separate from the overall CIP document. Attachments: (3) VI.-1 Draft 5-Year CIP (2017-2021), 3 ring binder VI.-2 2017 Summary List VI.-3 2017 Map zL City of Eap TO: FROM: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL c/o DAVE OSBERG, CITY A RUSS MATTHYS, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: May 5, 2016 SUBJECT: 5 -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP), 2017-2021 The Public Works Department is pleased to present its 5 -Year Capital Improvement Plan (Part IH -- infrastructure) for the years 2017-2021. This CIP is an essential tool employed for managing improvements to the billions of dollars of public infrastructure for which the City's Public Works Department is responsible. This critical evaluation of our community's maturing infrastructure is valuable for managing the financing of needed future improvements. This CIP has been coordinated with both the current and proposed CII''s for Dakota County and MnDOT, unless otherwise noted. HIGHLIGHTS Detailed information on the CIP funding sources, process, supporting evaluation programs, and all Part 1H Infrastructure categories follows later in this memo, but the most significant and new aspects of the 2017-2021 CII' are highlighted here. ® Northwest Parkway Street & Utility Improvements (Vikings Development) The Vikings are coming, or so it appears. While this statement may have stirred up fear in many of our forefathers over a thousand years ago, we modern day Eaganites seem to be taking a more accepting approach to their apparent desire to settle in our city. The proposed development of nearly 200 acres within the northeast corner of town, primarily on the former Northwest Airlines headquarters property, will likely include the installation of a significant amount of public improvements. The following CIP includes this anticipated development infrastructure so that you may include consideration of said improvements and the related City costs with the rest of the proposed CIP improvements. The development related improvements include a collector roadway, trails, roundabouts, trunk water main, upgrade of trunk sanitary sewer and County highway alterations. The proposed CIP improvements have associated City cost participation estimates that may vary from the actual final City contributions. City staff are currently working with the Vikings representatives and the Finance Committee on an agreement that would include projected cost estimates for the City and developer's financial contributions to the needed public improvements. Based upon the financial summaries included as the attachments to this memo, the City has some room for flexibility on the funding of these improvements. r Water Reuse - Significant interest in the reduction of the groundwater demand within the metro area, namely by municipal drinking water systems, has been heightened recently. With 1 million gallons of groundwater being dewatered daily as part of the operations of the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant, the capture or reuse of this water and distribution as irrigation for the industrial area around the plant has been found to be desirable to a number of agencies. Through a partnership with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES), operator of the plant, end users and funding sources are being developed. The proposed collection and distribution system for this non -potable water would have a significant impact on the Water Trunk CIP, with an estimated cost of $5 million. City staff believe the high cost can be significantly offset through the acquisition of substantial grants due to the attractive nature of the improvements in the current grant environment. Pursuit of the proposed improvements is being recommended if efforts to attain auxiliary funding are successful. MCES, Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) staff are pursuing funding opportunities for the City. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The City of Eagan has been fiscally responsible in anticipating the future infrastructure needs of the community and creating the necessary funding sources, programs and opportunities to provide the ongoing revenues necessary to build and maintain a reliable system in a planned and orderly manner. These revenue sources include: Municipal State Aid (Gas & Motor Vehicle Sales Taxes, etc) ® Special Assessments f Connection Charges & User Fees o Property Taxes w Development Fees o Agency Grants and/or participatory funding programs A 5 -year CIP is instrumental in evaluating the construction and maintenance needs against the current available and projected fund balances so that fiscally prudent decisions can be made in a timely and planned manner. In addition to the projected expenditures for the next 5 years (2017 to 2021), the financial summaries following this memo take into account the outstanding financial obligations and revenues committed for the current year (2016) providing a 6 year window of evaluation. A variety of influences in a global market affecting real estate, fuel and construction material prices have the potential for impacting costs in a way that may significantly exceed the estimates contained in this CIP. For ease in comparison, there has been little, if any, inflationary indices applied to the cost and revenue projections for future years. When reviewing the All -Fund summary (Exhibit 3), you will note that the Major Street Fund, at $34.7 million comprises approximately 56% of the total obligations ($62.1 million) in this CIP. A few highlights should be noted regarding the projected revenues into the Major Street Fund. Transportation - Major Street Fund There are two significant sources to the revenue stream that finance the transportation elements of the CIP. Municipal State AidSA) - This is the City's share of state gas taxes, license tab fees and vehicle sales taxes. The State Legislature's passage of a Comprehensive -2- Transportation Bill may address increases in the gas tax or provide other means in which to increase the state's contribution to this funding source. The overhauled MSA formula used to calculate each city's allocation is providing the City with allocations comparable to the recent past. • Ma or Street Fund Le - This is funded completely as a portion of the City's property taxes collected through Dakota County. The 2016 allocation is $2.71 million. In 2008, the Council included an additional $1 million levy to the Major Street Fund account earmarked for future "Overpasses and Interchanges". This addition to the levy has contributed funding for two overpasses, Northwood Parkway and Duckwood Drive. There are no future projects proposed that would fall under this improvement category. With the completion of these two major overpasses, this additional contribution is planned to end in 2022 as the cost of these overpasses is fully addressed. The Major Street Fund Pro -Forma (Exhibit 1) shows that the Fund's projected Beginning Balance in 2016 of $15.0 million will fall to approximately $13.8 million at the end of this proposed 5 -year CIP (2021). The responsibility of pavement maintenance for recreational/park trails and City park/facility parking lots belonging to the Major Street Fund (historically addressed as part of the General Facilities Renewal and Replacement) will deduct $0.8 million over the 5 -year CTP. All Funds Anal Currently, the City has approximately $19.4 million of open contracts and approved financial obligations through 2016 for all Transportation and Utility Part III infrastructure improvements (Exhibit 2 - "Capital Improvement Plan - SUI EVIARY"). The enclosed 5 -year CII' ('17 221) identifies an additional $68.7 million of proposed improvements and other financial obligations over the next 5 years. While this is an average of $13.7 million/year, 2017 includes 27% of the proposed improvements at a cost of $18.3 million. The first year of the CIP includes proposed street and utilities improvements for the Vikings development at an estimated cost of $5.3 million. The Finance Department's analysis incorporated the current Cash Balance of $51.1 million (all funds as of 12-31-15) (Exhibit 3) along with, the 2016-2021 pLojected revenues of $64.6 million and proposed expenditures of $66.2 million, and projects a net positive balance of $49.4 million at the end of this 5 year plan. Water Trunk CIP Improvements include a significant increase of costs ($5 million) over the first three years (2017-19) with the proposed water reuse improvements in coordination with the Metropolitan Council and their Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant. Staff believes the funding proposed in the CIP is very conservative due to the high likelihood of the acquisition of significant grants, including federal funding. An updated cost analysis will be provided to the City Council for their consideration of proceeding with the proposed water reuse improvements that will address the anticipated non -city funding of the improvements at the time when a project would be authorized. Without any external funding, City staff questions the return on investment (ROD for the proposed improvements. BACKGROUND 11 Pavement manammeni Streets The City of Eagan has historically prepared a 5-Year CIP to better plan for and finance major public infrastructure improvements within the community. The Pavement Management Program (PMP) incorporates various pavement maintenance and rehabilitation strategies to help extend the life expectancy of our streets. An annual inventory of the pavement condition rating of all of our streets combined with the age and previous maintenance history helps determine which maintenance strategy would be most effective in extending its life expectancy and maximizing the City's return on its initial capital investment. The Public Works Department reviews and updates the surface condition of all Eagan streets by assigning a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to every street segment. This rating process allows the City to estimate where any given street segment is in its projected life cycle. The PMP incorporates a Council adopted goal of maintaining a system wide annual average PCI of 75. At 2015 year end, the average PCI was 83.0, inflated primarily due to the "bulge" of neighborhood street overlays completed from 2011 to 2013. Trails A modified PMP has been implemented for our recreational and transportation trails throughout the city. Because trails are not susceptible to the stresses associated with heavy vehicles, and smaller surface irregularities are more safety sensitive to users, the street PMP cannot be used without modifications. Staff has to rely on past experience combined with intuitive analyses to estimate the needs for this 5 -year CIP. City facility parking lots were also evaluated through the modified PMP and are represented herein. This CIP implements the most cost effective, timely and long-term maintenance program that allows the City to continue to meet our policy standards and plan for a projected 50+ year life cycle for its transportation system. II. Comprehensive Mana ement Plans The City has prepared and periodically updates its Comprehensive Management Plans for each of the major infrastructure systems (Sanitary Sewer, Water Supply and Distribution, Stormwater Management, Water Quality & Wetland Management, and Transportation). The improvements in this CIP are in conformance and compliance with each of these current adopted Management Plans. Their improvement schedule compliments the City's projected development, growth and maintenance demands, but is also somewhat flexible based on internal fiscal constraints or partnering agency funding participation opportunities. Each one of these Comprehensive Plans was used as a basis for this 5 -year CIP. PROCESS Due to project complexities, desired public notification and participation process, combined with the County, State and Federal agencies' funding application, review and approval schedules, it has become necessary to consider adoption of the 5 -Year CIP during early spring (May -June). The adoption of the CIP in this time frame allows the City to better coordinate with other agency's CIPs, prepare the necessary feasibility reports, hold the public hearings and advertise for bids for approved projects in the most economical season (winter/spring). The following is a summary of some of the more significant or higher profile projects included in this 5 -year program as well as those that are not in conformance with other agencies' CIPs: STREETS/HIGHWAYS A. Overpasses & Interchanges This CIP does not include any improvements within this category, so no detailed information referencing any such improvements has been included. Related summary information will indicate no values accordingly. B. Arterials & Collectors The City has reached the point in its ongoing CIP implementation where the vast majority of improvements are life -extending maintenance overlays. A slight, yet noteworthy, transformation is represented in the CIP as five second generation overlays (collector streets) are included. A typical overlay after milling the edge of the street will be replaced by an overlay after a complete milling of the entire street surface. 1. Northwest Parkway — Lone Oak Parkway to Ames Crossin Road 22-170004 — The proposed improvements would be associated with the Vikings site development and include a divided four -lane roadway with landscaped median and trails. The City's share is estimated at $1.OM, 25% of the estimated total cost, due to the current lack of an agreement with the developer. ($4.OM) C. Local Street Improvements As with the Arterials and Collectors, the vast majority of Local Street Improvements are life -extending maintenance overlays. There is no "Future" category as all other streets are on a continuum of the City's extended maintenance program. The anticipated local street projects through this CIP are representative of the average expectation. Twenty of the overlays (local streets) included in the CEP are proposed to include the complete milling of the entire street surface rather than only the edge, followed by a typical overlay. D. Trails This CIP incorporates trailways and sidewalks that are adjacent to streets and thoroughfares designed for non -vehicular transportation, as well as recreational trail systems internal to the City's parks. No new trail projects are proposed, other than those adjacent to the aforementioned Northwest Parkway, as all of the indicated needs are related to maintenance overlays similar to our local street program. Dakota County's policy provides for 55% of the cost for County Road trail overlays; to date they have had sufficient funding to match our annual needs. E. Street Sealcoat (Surface Maintenance) Crack sealing and periodic aggregate chip sealcoat treatments have been shown to be one of the most cost effective preventative maintenance programs for extending the life cycle of streets. Based on the Pavement Management Program previously adopted by the City Council, streets are scalcoated approximately 3-4 years after original construction or latest re -surfacing. A life -extending overlay occurs when the street surface is approximately 18- 22 years old. The cycle then repeats itself providing a 50-60 year life expectancy for the street that would include three sealcoats. The magnitude of this improvement is directly -5- related to the size and schedule of the Arterial/Collector/Local street resurfacing programs contained in the 5 -year CIP. F. Signals and Intersection Improvements Presently, there are 70 signalized intersections within the City limits with only 4 under the City's jurisdiction. All others are under the State or County jurisdiction with various levels of City financial obligations for major improvements. This 5 -Year CIP identifies 40 intersections programmed for: new signal installations (1), roundabouts (2), geometric reconfigurations (5), signal modifications (3), Arterial Traffic Management System improvements (35) and flashing yellow arrow modifications (13+/-). Here are some of the more significant locations: 1. Northwest Parkwgy @ Ames Crossing Road 22-179991 and a, Lone Oak Parkwa (22-179992) — Roundabouts — The proposed improvements would be associated with the Vikings site development and include roundabouts at the east and west entrances to the site. The timing of the intersection control is scheduled earlier than typical to take advantage of the opportunity to acquire needed right-of-way from the developer at no cost and to enhance familiarity for visitors of the development from day one. ($0.5M) 2. Diffley Road A Braddock Trail — Intersection Reconfiguration (22-179993) & Signal Modifications (22-219999) — The Council has received a concern from a resident about the operation of this intersection. In response, City and County staff have studied the intersection and adjusted its configuration to ensure its optimal operation. Improvements to the intersection could further enhance its operation. Due to other transportation system needs and priorities, phased improvements are being proposed. Initial 2017 improvements include extension of the east bound left turn lane on Diffley Road and pedestrian countdown timers. The second phase proposes signal modifications/replacement in 2021 with the anticipated contribution of ISD 196 property to allow a dedicated southbound right turn lane. ($0.14M + $0.45M) 3. Lone Oak Road A Lone Oak Drive — Intersection Reconfi ation 22-179997 — The draft Final AUAR for the Vikings development recommended minor intersection improvements at this location as a result of site development for Phase 1 or the Vikings headquarters and training facility. A future complete modification of the intersection, including possible traffic control, would be completed at the time that the County upgrades Lone Oak Road to 4 lanes. ($0.30M) 4. Lone Oak Road A Lexington Avenue — Intersection Reconfiguration & Signal Modifications 22-180021 — The operation of this intersection has been on the City and County's radar screens for some time due to its proximity to I -35E and the USPS Bulk and Regional Mail Facility. Dakota County has scheduled the significant improvement of this intersection due to current and proposed Level of Service concerns. ($2.65M) 5. Arterial Traffic Management System — Signal Operations (22-190161) — The objective of the arterial management program is to advance management practices and operations strategies that promote the safe and efficient use of arterial roadway capacity to reduce congestion. Dakota County will be initiating this system in the near future and has solicited the City's participation to include 35 signalized intersections within the city. ($1.69M) 6. Yankee Doodle Road (c, Mike Collins Drive - Intersection Reconfiguration(22-210165) — As recommended in the Yankee Doodle Road Access Management and Corridor Study, the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Mike Collins Drive is proposed to i be reconfigured as a 314 access intersection with no permitted left -turn movements from the local side streets. ($O.1OM) 7 Yankee Doodle Road @ Elrene Road — Signal 22-210166 —Dakota County has E scheduled this intersection of Yankee Doodle Road for a new signal based upon the Yankee Doodle Road Access Management and Corridor Study and expected traffic patterns. ($0.30M) G. Streetlights This element pertains to the installation or upgrade of streetlights at major intersections, the maintenance painting of traffic signals, and the maintenance painting of City -owned street lights (Promenade, Central Parkway, and Cedar Grove areas only). It does not include the installation or maintenance of residential neighborhood lights or continuous commercial street lighting typically associated with new developments. This typically modest program is based on an annual inventory of needs along the arterial and collector routes. H. Other (Parking Lots, Signs, Noise Walls, Transit, etc) This category addresses the variety of specialty projects that are associated with a more mature suburban community and other special funded or mandated programs. This CIP only includes the pavement management of City owned parking lots. UTILITIES A. Water Trunk Distribution This portion of the CIP has historically been somewhat development driven and based on the most current Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan. This year's CIP identifies various and unique trunk water system improvements including new means of enhancing firefighting and providing non -potable water for irrigation purposes. 1. Storz Connections (61-170008) — Storz nozzles allow firefighters to connect to hydrants with a quick quarter -turn connection, which saves time (30-60 seconds). They also eliminate the need for additional adapters, cross -threading, hose connection problems, and multiple thread specifications that may be found throughout the system. All existing city owned and city maintained (public) hydrants will be updated on schedule with the annual street revitalization projects. ($I. 77M) 2. Water Reuse Project (61-170051) — The capture of groundwater being dewatered daily as part of the operations of the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant and redistribution as irrigation for the industrial area around the plant, as well as fire protection in the river valley bottoms, as proposed, would reduce the demand on the City's water production. The improvements, including a pumping station, piping and connections, would be completed in conjunction with collection and treatment improvements by the MCES over a three year period (2017-19). The successful acquisition of grants would be critical to the realization of this project. ($5.021) 3. Well #22 Well House (61-170052) — With the completion of the construction of Well #22 on the former Lockheed -Martin site in 2016 in conjunction with the site development by CSM, the placement of the well house would complete this City endeavor. The Water Supply and Distribution Plan (2008) called for this well site within the north well field. The schedule was intended to minimize the impact to the development site and surrounding businesses. ($0.60M) -7- 4. Northwest Parkway_(Vikin s Development) Trunk Water Main Extensions 61- 170055 — Another aspect of the proposed development of the northeast corner of the city. The development would provide the appropriate schedule and partial demand for the trunk water main installation recommended in the Water Supply and Distribution Plan (2008). The developer would address the costs of the lateral benefits. ($0.45M) 5. New Well #23 (61-1600 — Another new well is called to be developed in the City's south well field per the Water Supply and Distribution Plan (2008) based on projected consumption demands in the high pressure zone. It is tentatively programmed for 2021 as the Cliff Road Water Treatment Plant has capacity to accommodate it. ($0.62M) B. Water Operations & Yacwties This element identifies programmed improvements for both Renewal & Replacement (R & R) and Supply, Storage & Treatment (SST) capital improvements. It programs the scheduled rotation of preventative rehab/repair of existing wells approximately every 6-8 years depending on the well's usage and unique aquifer attributes. Some of the other significant capital improvements are: 1. Municipal Well Rehabilitation (61-17000 - Remove, inspect, rehabilitate, and install municipal wells on 7 year cycle (approximately 45,000 running hours). Refurbishing includes equipment removal, equipment disassembly and inspection, replacement of worn or broken parts, equipment reassembly, coating protection, televising the actual well (determine physical condition), cleaning the casing, installation, and final inspection/testing. ($0.12M to $0.14M per year, 5 -year Total of $0.64M) 2. SCADA Renewal/Update — Ci -Wide 61-170002 — Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) is the City's computer system that monitors the water infrastructure including wells, treatment plants, water storage reservoirs, and pump stations. Currently, portions of the water system are not monitored, most equipment is more than 10 years old and hardware installations are not consistent. A 5 -year plan is proposed to place SCADA at all sites to improve system operation and monitoring while reducing staff time requirements. ($0.1M per year, 5 -year Total of $0.5M) 3. Meter Change -Out Program (61-170003) - Replace water meters that determine customer usage. Life expectancy of 1" meter is 23 years or 3 million gallons (industry standard). Out of a total of 20,000, more than 3,000 meters are above the age limit. System water loss has been increasing (an indication of either leaks in the system or errant metering). Part of 25 -year meter replacement program. ($0.12M to $0.14M per year, 5 -year Total of $0.64M) C. Sanitary Sewer — Trunk Conveyance The trunk sanitary sewer system is nearly complete with the exception of a few undeveloped areas and a possible pipe capacity resolution to accommodate increasing community flows and potential redevelopment opportunities. 1. Lone Oak Drive Ecolab Districts NIT & NWA 62-170050 — Proposed in conjunction with the potential initial phase of the Vikings Development in 2017, the replacement of the undersized existing trunk system would address the insufficient capacity to handle future growth in the sewer district (Vikings Development and Boulder Lakes). ($0.35M) -8- 2. Red Pine Crossing SgWiga Sewer Extension(District C -GG 62-170050 - Dependent upon the schedule of associated development (Red Pine Crossing), the replacement of the existing temporary sanitary sewer lift station (Long Acres) with gravity sanitary sewer is tentatively scheduled for 2018. ($0.10M) D. Sanitary Sewer — Facilities and Operations This includes all aspects of the sanitary collection system including 14 pumping stations and force mains. For more than a decade, an annual program of relining approximately a mile of the older segments of the system to structurally strengthen the pipe and seal out ground water infiltration. The program is proposed to be continued due to the Inflow & Infiltration mitigation benefits received. The CIP also includes the minor installation of SCADA telemetry installations at 5 sanitary sewer lift stations (5 -year Total of $0.50M) 1. Ashbury Lift Station — Rehabilitation (62.170002) — The Ashbury lift station was constructed in 1989. It has a variety of issues including mechanical attrition, wet well access, and old control hardware. It is proposed to rehabilitate the existing station in 2017 to enhance operational efficiencies and reduce the potential risk of property damage. ($0.30M) 2. Wid eon Way Lift Station — Rehabilitation 62-170002 — The Widgeon Way Lift Station was constructed in the late 1980's as a temporary station. It has a variety of issues including mechanical wear, needed pump replacements, and an old control panel. It is proposed to rehabilitate the existing station in 2018 to enhance operational efficiencies and reduce the potential risk of property damage from failure. ($0.30M) E. Storm Sewer — Trunk Conveyance This section is primarily for the conveyance of excess surface water runoff and not for water quality proposed improvements. There are primarily minor improvements (< $100,000) anticipated for the next 5 years which primarily enhance flood protection as indicated in the 2007 update of the Stonnwater Management Plan. 1. Pond AP -8 Expansion (64-170052) — Pond AP -8 addresses additional capacity needs for the existing storm sewer system. Past development interest in the property that includes Pond AP -8 revealed that the anticipated pond improvements may render the property undevelopable. A revised design is proposed including adjacent property that would address the capacity needs and allow the development of the undeveloped property. ($0.20M) F. Storm Sewer — Facilities and Operations This includes all aspects for the operation of the storm drainage system including 21 pumping stations and force mains. The CIP includes the minor installation of SCADA telemetry installations at 5 critical storm sewer lift stations (5 -year Total of $0.30ND along with general pond maintenance and the following planned major capital improvements anticipated within the next 5 years. 1. Apollo Lift Station -_Capacity Improvement (64-170050) — The Apollo Lift Station serves the Eagandale Corporate Center industrial area. Recent storm events have highlighted storm water capacity issues due to pumping challenges. It is proposed to upgrade the existing station in 2017 to enhance operational efficiencies and reduce the potential risk of property damage from limitations at the lift station. ($0.43M) -9- G. Water Quality The 2017-21 CIP continues to represent the significant ettort needed to recognize the public storm sewer system requirements that address heightened water quality mandates. As introduced in the 2016-20 CIP, significant improvements throughout the system due to the interconnectivity of Eagan's storm water system are possible due to the Council's major revision of the program's funding. 1. Water Quality Cost Share Partnership Program (65-140011) — Council approved Water Quality Cost Share Partnership grants for residents, businesses, and institutions with the goal of improving public water resources and developing empowerment and partnership opportunities. (avg. $62,500/yr, 5 -year Total of $0.31M) 2. Cfty Hall/Munioj al Cam us Stormwater BMPs 65-180003 - Water Quality Best Management Practices project at City Hall/Civic Arena/Cascade Bay would provide a high profile demonstration site while addressing Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. ($0.91M) 3. Ponds DP -4A, DP -4B, DP -26, DP -27 Improvements (65-180004) — A variety of storm water pond improvements to address the runoff from the highly impervious areas of the Town Centre and Promenade commercial areas prior to discharge into LeMay Lake. ($1.70M) 4. Lake LP -42 Carlson Lake hn rovements 65-190008 — Proposed re-routing of storm sewers in Carlson Lake Park and Oak Chase Park, as well as stormwater treatment systems, are needed to reduce phosphorus levels below TMDL required levels. ($1.80M) 5. Lake DP -2 (LeMay Lake) Improvements (65_-200003) — Storm basin expansions, storm sewer re-routing, iron enhanced filtration systems, and alum treatments will be needed to reduce phosphorus levels of this impaired water body receiving direct untreated runoff from the Eagandale Industrial Park. ($3.05M) SUMMARY The importance of the steadfast leadership of the City Council cannot be understated as it provides the critical guidance required to responsibly manage the vast amount of infrastructure essential to the high quality of life found in Eagan. The City Council's effective utilization of the 5 -Year CIP is vital to maintaining consistently high ratings from the community as a result of comparably (metro -wide) low property taxes and equitable service fees, easy accessibility, regardless of the mode of transportation, and superior public services. The experience and innovation of the Public Works staff are critical to the successful management of the City's infrastructure and are manifest in the thoughtful improvements and balanced funding sources that constitute the proposed 2017-21 CIP. I would like to recognize the personnel of the Finance and Public Works Departments for their creativity, effort, and thoroughness in preparing this document for the City Council and the general public so that the growth and maintenance of our community may continue at the highest standards in an environmentally and economically conscientious manner. City staff are truly dedicated to improving the quality of life for present and future generations alike. I respectfully submit this CIP to you with the commitment that it will allow the continuation of the quality infrastructure that you have come to expect and I look forward to presenting the information contained in this document to the City Council and the ensuing discussion. -10- Sincerely, Xu4tl� M,:Z6i Director of Public Works Att: CIP Financing Plans and Pro -Formas (Exhibits 1, 2 & 3) Enc: 5 -Year CIP (2017-2021), 3 -ring binder C: Eric Macbeth, Water Resources Manager John Gorder, City Engineer Tim Plath, Transportation Operations Engineer Tom Pepper, Director of Finance Jon Eaton, Superintendent of Utilities Alexandra O'Leary, Accountant I:Ph&eering/CIP/2417-21 CII' Cover Trans memo i -11 8 n # m o 0 0 0( k/ '$ R d-� < R g co 44 Q A § 2 2 k�§ : o Cl Nr in CL 2 6��� co �/) r LL a w-®2 ■ § e §Q_ m r $ E a§« : ® 2� 4)® a C4 e c o 0 � a 2 N § � B� %$m2a CL V- P m � ■ R // UL& m / 04 o k k k 2 q�$ $ G 2 k k k k ƒ770§�c� cm CIE 6. Lo00Q 9 N � c co0.IL w qr m< 2 4 ( * LU C4 # $G� CO) CD 2 �/ -kk @ q _ + 40 N04 V C4e # # $ �kkkk eC A/V— Go k ■ o � _ e m L ■ \ to # CM 1000 /q§� w o� CO CM CA, Win- oma cm IL A _ + e Cc I 22 eto U)° $ V) I r- 2 q$ S g 0 eq �o �2 co■� t- ■one e r + v c & q O§ ' § # 400. 20 © n � c © I/$ g r 00 0 G 1- C OR o r o o m o 0 k� + � 0)o& co Mt # 4* CY a N 8 k/ < 2 2 : CL 2 c �/) LL a w-®2 ■ § e §Q_ m r $ E a§« : ® 2� 4)® a § e c o 0 � a 2 N § � B� %$m2a CL V- P m � ■ R // UL& m / 04 o k k k 2 - k ƒ770§�c� 6. Lo00Q 9 � c co0.IL 7 a. a_ IL m< 2 LU 0 � 2 >i � E E Ln a u R a A S �I IJ N n LO O 0 0 ¢ a O h T LO C+'). co oD It U I- a 0 0 0CO ¢ 0 c 0 0 0 C r 0 O r W ma N ti O O N_ A 0 Y O N M M N w m Cn r N a M N h N a a O h ti N O N h CO M CO O N S LO Y O W w O N N N O N O) CD M T t- r N r N T T Y T w p rl ' O-cr O N a 0 m 0 0 0 O O a 0 0 t- o O O cc a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C"7 N N It Ln h' a LCj lO IO O O O ti d O O N f� M O It O ti C� M r 0 0 M Ln O r - h rN VN' 0 h d' o d cO7 r O V O N 0D CV T N O p p O p' NCO Cm O CDN0OOOOOOO h M M "7 h O O r 0 0 0 Q O 0 0 0 VN CD O LO W a LO O O) O O O N 0 0 0' h CO mco o m r• wr- MCOIt�NO LO in CO r i` CO O n M m 0 1- v LC) N O O O N O O T r M� CD Y M N O N O Y T M N r r VIP p w O O m o 0 O O O O O a h Hr aN0co O 0 NOOOOO000 0 Cn N r I- ' N 4 W 07 a a 0 oc O a a V� C6 C7 O O r rz -e C'9 Ln M 0 N a V- N 0� O O I.- O W N f� T � r W O W C4 Mt- MM CN h CDCO MON N N r N N N LA Ci9 p W I O co O C A 0 0 0 O O 0 0 o O O O f p OECD CO O O LO 0OOOOOOO V' Cy O N Cq A 0 LC] LO N O O o CD 0 0 0 N CD � co CD LO r. - W CO cD o lTa O O O co v N N f` M Crf d CD r O r a M N T LV N Irz C9 N L!1 r 4A p L`I ' N N 0 W CD 0 a N 0 0 0 O O O O a N r M r M N P 0 0 M a 0 0 0 0 0 a a h O N ti pl NR N LC) CD Ln O O O CO 0 0 0 ' N _ _ N T O M N N r A 0 M M O C7 T h CD r I� O CA CO CO LC) O 0 0 V 0 O m T N It r- r C) CD h o O r O M h Cq N N O fA y} Id oa o o o a 0 O a O o o o o a 0 a o 0 0 o a a o 0 0 (D 0 0 o O O m C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 q O O O a 0 ' O ?� L() ti LO C�r� w C7 0 o O O o o ui 0 CC.��i N LY r l) ti LD li] Lo LO O N- O M LC, LO CN N r N N O T- E E 0 c pm 3 a c m m m c m FLE m E c E 2 - ni Cv y d 0 w L c c � t 'U _ 0 0 COLD 0 C 0 Q 6 0 C L0 a C d U y m c d'E 2E c Li ad ' E�� C V m-5 c c oa *6 ��'m cIO w r-0 m m m E d rnFL E a; ¢¢ 1° E m c m o <c O Q J h 0 � f 5 - 0� CO U) � 0. 2 M h h Cl o a (0 C7 O M I,,:. r O O Cif 0) 0 CD r~ r 'TNN h V 0 0 co r r M CA C G CLD CO r 0 GO,* r r p O N [� O O O h ,.Zt Ln O O al N It 0 LCA O W N CD M N M hcor0) 'It r CD 64 _O N O O r CDO00 N h O O O) r O ¢ LC) W Co LO 0 O 0 n N N CA b4 �tOOO V O r o 0 0 N M O 0 LCCLD�� mo CI f Lh LO N N #A r O O O O W O co O O t - c'! O 0 U7 CD r,O N H I,- h to Co CA -t %t T CD 1 r �t �t a O co O O) O O C7) cq C7 C h CO CD LC] 0 O .Y- OD O O) CO CO P) LO IO T V* V- 61% 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oCoppo<tCD O Lp N O it Q) C'7 r Ri r 64 V� Y L�G77 2 c � c LL m N = uj+_-'LL LL a C 6 EL •C ( W 'rD- C O E a?DC Co 2503:'n 00 N 0 1 co CA CO N O CD co co CV CD m co h M I co p 0) CNO ' LO N MIIn COD O p n N COD O 0 LC) N Ln Lq V' CD LC) O N N OOi�CM+JT N T � p 0 N O0 0— 00 o CV co Ln U) " M N N sN- OBD Co h r N N rl p +- CO N h N M Cli r m � O r to N p c O .t Q C] a c " C7 m m c ID w co o y o mC �c I m v ; m CL m Cq co LL d LL t7 CD ' Cl.C, M I co CD 0 r V• ; N p c O .t Q C] a c " C7 m m c ID w co o y o mC �c I m v ; m CL m Cq co LL d LL 9 LD O N Ln Ix x E E 7 N CL U a L 0) LO CO _ IC) W _ r r r r In W v 'gym' I` aD m o ui N In Ill fz (LD O (OD N P! r N r v O) C.) .N.� CD r aD N O — d 0 M r W L Il i a s C 0) co (p o 0 L N OD O go N t_ d OD CD Ln v N AM M m N aC4T v A C y � 4i ((yy//ppiiGVJ- d N (D r N O 1l- Ip U') ti 4 Ch as� GD O N V r N N O N O TC4 to cp c c C C7 CV V C C C r` W � � 9 p�7 cmti It to � O0 0 tB O Cl. CO 07 h O O r Li Gf1 G T co O N N O e'9 Io z a LL 69.k 'G _ � _ C IL E W (� iii N !T L M Ili ^ r W Jn (D O! m 9 C� "p �+ r L T N O M LD M N T (v N N M (y CO M v Ep IA N 1 W C C (D C7 cr v C 117 C = 11 S W w 'YS c a •� Q 0' T M 1 7 17 O N (ND `"' N ICP Q :C. W E t- O O O r N OD W LO In m N W Ci r T v y .� C o a I� U. e � O N N g w V CL T-- m a w N P N w L v v N N �,�� $ f� o� = LL c _ LO 7 LL d t C W O T w $ c LP 7 V yy C 0 0 0 co w 0 0 0 r L L 0 0 m W L (D BD N N a cr Of N (y V CO a0 0 _C S A LL Y M L N N N Q O 3 O ~ 0 /�J H M OD M lo- N �' N 1C1I� r m A O O ('? iN7 O W d' CCN) 7 (�9 In N OO In w M N y T W) �' M N w 2 LL 69 0 Ta a L" -C O O O O Q p U L W 1�p 16N N N N N P m LOA C us1 F N O p LL (� � T 7 N LD O N Ln Ix x E E 7 N CL U a Funding Sources Category Project Description Total CIP County/State Federal Private (Non-City) Private Property Assessments Major Street Fund Utility Enterprise and Trunk Funds Water Quality Fund Total City Cost Street / Highways Collector & Arterial Improvements 4,162,232 - 3,063,070 1,095,162 4,000 - 1,099,162 Overpasses & Interchanges - - - - - - - Intersection Improvements 1,483,250 521,875 350,000 611,375 - - 611,375 Local Improvements 1,211,712 - 446,414 748,298 17,000 - 765,298 Other - Signs, Sound Walls, Transit, Etc.157,692 - - 112,298 45,394 - 157,692 Seal Coat Maintenance 701,428 - - 701,428 - - 701,428 Street Construction 91,878 - 26,964 62,914 2,000 - 64,914 Trails 470,780 211,851 - 258,929 - - 258,929 Intersection Lights - - - - - - - Subtotal 8,278,972 733,726 3,886,448 3,590,404 68,394 - 3,658,798 Utilities Water Trunk Distribution 2,301,500 - 325,000 - 1,976,500 - 1,976,500 Water Facilities & Operations 834,000 - - - 834,000 - 834,000 Sanitary - Trunk Conveyance 500,000 - - - 500,000 - 500,000 Sanitary Sewer Facilities & Operations 763,000 - - - 763,000 - 763,000 Intersection Lights 82,500 - - - 82,500 - 82,500 Storm Trunk Conveyance 200,000 - - - 200,000 - 200,000 Storm Facilities & Operations 853,000 - - - 853,000 - 853,000 Subtotal 5,534,000 - 325,000 - 5,209,000 - 5,209,000 Water Quality Water Quality Improvements 2,043,500 12,500 - - 451,000 1,580,000 2,031,000 Ponds & Sediment Removal 100,000 - - - 65,000 35,000 100,000 TOTAL 15,956,472 746,226 4,211,448 3,590,404 5,793,394 1,615,000 10,998,798 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Eagan 2017-2021 2017 GRAND SUMMARY Funding Sources Category Project Description Total CIP County/State Federal Private (Non-City) Private Property Assessments Major Street Fund Utility Enterprise and Trunk Funds Water Quality Fund Total City Cost Street / Highways Collector & Arterial Improvements 361,000 - 142,161 211,839 7,000 - 218,839 Overpasses & Interchanges - - - - - - - Intersection Improvements 2,750,000 2,461,500 - 288,500 - - 288,500 Local Improvements 1,446,248 - 490,695 930,553 25,000 - 955,553 Other - Signs, Sound Walls, Transit, Etc.354,550 - - 324,170 30,380 - 354,550 Seal Coat Maintenance 287,789 - - 287,789 - - 287,789 Street Construction - - - - - - - Trails 237,360 106,812 - 130,548 - - 130,548 Intersection Lights - - - - - - - Subtotal 5,436,947 2,568,312 632,856 2,173,399 62,380 - 2,235,779 Utilities Water Trunk Distribution 2,277,200 - - - 2,277,200 - 2,277,200 Water Facilities & Operations 1,067,000 - - - 1,067,000 - 1,067,000 Sanitary - Trunk Conveyance 100,000 - - - 100,000 - 100,000 Sanitary Sewer Facilities & Operations 665,000 - - - 665,000 - 665,000 Intersection Lights 77,500 - - - 77,500 - 77,500 Storm Trunk Conveyance 10,000 - - - 10,000 - 10,000 Storm Facilities & Operations 142,000 - - - 142,000 - 142,000 Subtotal 4,338,700 - - - 4,338,700 - 4,338,700 Water Quality Water Quality Improvements 3,098,600 287,500 - - 129,100 2,682,000 2,811,100 Ponds & Sediment Removal 107,000 - - - 107,000 - 107,000 TOTAL 12,981,247 2,855,812 632,856 2,173,399 4,637,180 2,682,000 9,492,579 City of Eagan 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2017-2021 2018 GRAND SUMMARY Funding Sources Category Project Description Total CIP County/State Federal Private (Non-City) Private Property Assessments Major Street Fund Utility Enterprise and Trunk Funds Water Quality Fund Total City Cost Street / Highways Collector & Arterial Improvements 353,992 - 104,097 242,895 7,000 - 249,895 Overpasses & Interchanges - - - - - - - Intersection Improvements 1,917,200 1,648,212 - 268,988 - - 268,988 Local Improvements 2,743,224 - 882,482 1,811,742 49,000 - 1,860,742 Other - Signs, Sound Walls, Transit, Etc.204,925 - - 191,315 13,610 - 204,925 Seal Coat Maintenance 300,766 - - 300,766 - - 300,766 Street Construction - - - - - - - Trails 350,160 157,572 - 192,588 - - 192,588 Intersection Lights - - - - - - - Subtotal 5,870,267 1,805,784 986,579 3,008,294 69,610 - 3,077,904 Utilities Water Trunk Distribution 2,483,900 - - - 2,483,900 - 2,483,900 Water Facilities & Operations 725,000 - - - 725,000 - 725,000 Sanitary - Trunk Conveyance - - - - - - - Sanitary Sewer Facilities & Operations 671,000 - - - 671,000 - 671,000 Intersection Lights 77,500 - - - 77,500 - 77,500 Storm Trunk Conveyance - - - - - - - Storm Facilities & Operations 143,000 - - - 143,000 - 143,000 Subtotal 4,100,400 - - - 4,100,400 - 4,100,400 Water Quality Water Quality Improvements 2,615,800 12,500 - - 528,300 2,075,000 2,603,300 Ponds & Sediment Removal 382,000 - - - 382,000 - 382,000 TOTAL 12,968,467 1,818,284 986,579 3,008,294 5,080,310 2,075,000 10,163,604 City of Eagan 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2017-2021 2019 GRAND SUMMARY Funding Sources Category Project Description Total CIP County/State Federal Private (Non-City) Private Property Assessments Major Street Fund Utility Enterprise and Trunk Funds Water Quality Fund Total City Cost Street / Highways Collector & Arterial Improvements 288,632 - 147,778 135,854 5,000 - 140,854 Overpasses & Interchanges - - - - - - - Intersection Improvements 100,000 50,000 - 50,000 - - 50,000 Local Improvements 1,819,984 - 595,395 1,190,589 34,000 - 1,224,589 Other - Signs, Sound Walls, Transit, Etc.38,012 - - 28,350 9,662 - 38,012 Seal Coat Maintenance 180,979 - - 180,979 - - 180,979 Street Construction - - - - - - - Trails 1,073,540 483,093 - 590,447 - - 590,447 Intersection Lights - - - - - - - Subtotal 3,501,147 533,093 743,173 2,176,219 48,662 - 2,224,881 Utilities Water Trunk Distribution 337,900 - - - 337,900 - 337,900 Water Facilities & Operations 483,000 - - - 483,000 - 483,000 Sanitary - Trunk Conveyance - - - - - - - Sanitary Sewer Facilities & Operations 678,000 - - - 678,000 - 678,000 Intersection Lights 77,500 - - - 77,500 - 77,500 Storm Trunk Conveyance - - - - - - - Storm Facilities & Operations 144,000 - - - 144,000 - 144,000 Subtotal 1,720,400 - - - 1,720,400 - 1,720,400 Water Quality Water Quality Improvements 3,357,200 12,500 - - 739,700 2,605,000 3,344,700 Ponds & Sediment Removal 222,000 - - - 222,000 - 222,000 TOTAL 8,800,747 545,593 743,173 2,176,219 2,730,762 2,605,000 7,511,981 2020 GRAND SUMMARY 2017-2021 City of Eagan 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Funding Sources Category Project Description Total CIP County/State Federal Private (Non-City) Private Property Assessments Major Street Fund Utility Enterprise and Trunk Funds Water Quality Fund Total City Cost Street / Highways Collector & Arterial Improvements 427,296 - 294,907 126,389 6,000 - 132,389 Overpasses & Interchanges - - - - - - - Intersection Improvements 950,000 502,500 - 447,500 - - 447,500 Local Improvements 2,413,404 - 1,085,033 1,293,371 35,000 - 1,328,371 Other - Signs, Sound Walls, Transit, Etc.43,555 - - 40,254 3,301 - 43,555 Seal Coat Maintenance 164,782 - - 164,782 - - 164,782 Street Construction - - - - - - - Trails 78,500 35,325 - 43,175 - - 43,175 Intersection Lights - - - - - - - Subtotal 4,077,537 537,825 1,379,940 2,115,471 44,301 - 2,159,772 Utilities Water Trunk Distribution 1,089,500 - - - 1,089,500 - 1,089,500 Water Facilities & Operations 491,000 - - - 491,000 - 491,000 Sanitary - Trunk Conveyance - - - - - - - Sanitary Sewer Facilities & Operations 385,000 - - - 385,000 - 385,000 Intersection Lights 77,500 - - - 77,500 - 77,500 Storm Trunk Conveyance - - - - - - - Storm Facilities & Operations 145,000 - - - 145,000 - 145,000 Subtotal 2,188,000 - - - 2,188,000 - 2,188,000 Water Quality Water Quality Improvements 101,200 - - - 16,200 85,000 101,200 Ponds & Sediment Removal 145,000 - - - 145,000 - 145,000 City of Eagan 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2017-2021 2021 GRAND SUMMARY PW Cip Summary.xlsx4/28/2016 EXHIBIT 1 2017-2021 Major Street Pro-Forma (in thousands of dollars) 2016-2021 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total Cash Balance 15,018$ 4,071$ 4,928$ 7,262$ 8,807$ 11,253$ 13,763$ Add Pro-Forma Receipts Property Taxes - General 1,813 1,849 1,886 1,924 1,962 2,002 9,624 Property Taxes - Overpassess and Interchanges 894 539 554 554 574 531 2,752 Municipal State Aid Annual Allocations and Advance 4,184 4,184 4,184 4,184 4,184 4,184 20,920 Bridge and Street Maintenance 70 70 70 70 70 70 350 After-the-Fact Bridge Needs 64 64 64 64 64 64 320 MSA Bonding Needs 52 52 52 52 52 52 260 Receipts 7,077 6,758 6,810 6,848 6,906 6,903 34,226 Subtract Pro-Forma Expenditures Projects Under Construction (2015 and prior)9,016 - - - - - - Financing of 2017 - 2021 CIP 6,684 3,590 2,173 3,008 2,176 2,115 13,064 MSA Advance Repayment 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 MSA Debt Service 324 311 303 294 285 277 1,470 Expenditures 18,024 5,901 4,476 5,302 4,461 4,392 24,534 Ending Fund Balance Pro-Forma 4,071$ 4,928$ 7,262$ 8,807$ 11,253$ 13,763$ 23,455$ PW Cip Summary.xlsx 4/28/2016 EXHIBIT 2 2017-2021 Part III, Infrastructure Existing Expenditures Projects 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TOTAL Overpass & Interchange -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Arterial & Collector 5,145,000 4,162,232 361,000 353,992 288,632 427,296 10,738,152 Local Streets 2,587,000 1,211,712 1,446,248 2,743,224 1,819,984 2,413,404 12,221,572 Trails 755,000 470,780 237,360 350,160 1,073,540 78,500 2,965,340 Sealcoat Maintenance 631,000 701,428 287,789 300,766 180,979 164,782 2,266,744 Street Construction - 91,878 - - - - 91,878 Intersection Improvements 2,518,000 1,483,250 2,750,000 1,917,200 100,000 950,000 9,718,450 Streetlighting 430,000 82,500 77,500 77,500 77,500 77,500 822,500 Transportation - other 1,509,000 157,692 354,550 204,925 38,012 43,555 2,307,734 Combined Utilities Trunk 550,000 3,001,500 2,387,200 2,483,900 337,900 1,089,500 9,850,000 Water: Oper. & Facilities 2,420,000 834,000 1,067,000 725,000 483,000 491,000 6,020,000 San: Oper. & Facilities 50,000 763,000 665,000 671,000 678,000 385,000 3,212,000 Storm: Oper. & Facilities 50,000 853,000 142,000 143,000 144,000 145,000 1,477,000 Water Quality - lakes, ponds and wetland improv 250,000 2,043,500 3,098,600 2,615,800 3,357,200 101,200 11,466,300 Ponds & Sediment Removal 145,000 100,000 107,000 382,000 222,000 145,000 1,101,000 MSA Advance Repayments 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 MSA Debt Service Payments 332,000 311,000 303,000 294,000 285,000 277,000 1,802,000 - - - - - - - Total Expenditures 19,372,000$ 18,267,472$ 15,284,247$ 15,262,467$ 11,085,747$ 8,788,737$ 87,510,670$ Financing Sources Major Street Fund 9,016,000$ 5,901,404$ 4,476,399$ 5,302,294$ 4,461,219$ 4,392,471$ 33,549,787$ Utility Enterprise Fund 3,561,000 5,113,394 4,477,180 5,030,310 2,680,762 1,724,501 19,026,147 Combined Utilities Trunk 1,219,000 680,000 160,000 50,000 50,000 669,000 2,828,000 Water Quality Fund 65,000 1,615,000 2,682,000 2,075,000 2,605,000 85,000 9,127,000 Subtotal 13,861,000 13,309,798 11,795,579 12,457,604 9,796,981 6,870,972 68,091,934 Special Assessments 984,300 4,211,448 632,856 986,579 743,173 1,379,940 8,938,296 State and/or County Participation 4,886,480 733,726 723,312 475,224 533,093 537,825 7,889,660 Federal and State Grants 377,600 - 2,120,000 1,330,560 - - 3,828,160 Private - 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 - 50,000 - - - - - - - Financing Sources 20,109,380$ 18,267,472$ 15,284,247$ 15,262,467$ 11,085,747$ 8,788,737$ 88,798,050$ Capital Improvement Plan - SUMMARY PW Cip Summary.xlsx4/28/2016 EXHIBIT 3 Major Street Fund 9375 Combined Utilities Trunk Fund 9376 Utility Enterprise Fund Operations 1115 (1) Water System R & R Fund 1121 Sanitary Sewer R & R Fund 1122 Water Supply & Storage Fund 1123 Storm Drainage Expansion & Modification 1125 Storm Drainage Renewal & Replacement 1126 Water Quality 1127 Total 12/31/2015 Cash Balance 15,018$ 4,480$ 771$ (2)8,132$ 6,246$ 8,792$ 3,066$ 3,898$ 681$ 51,084$ 2016-2021 Receipts 41,303 1,280 - 2,957 3,069 164 2,161 1,662 11,968 64,564 Available Resources 56,321 5,760 771 11,089 9,315 8,956 5,227 5,560 12,649 115,648 Net Cost by Source 2016 (9,016) (1,219) (85) (1,057) (253) - - (160) (160) (11,950) 2017 (5,901) (680) (151) (1,115) (1,134) (1,775) (440) (499) (1,615) (13,310) 2018 (4,476) (160) (140) (1,344) (615) (2,000) (117) (261) (2,682) (11,796) 2019 (5,302) (50) (147) (1,209) (621) (2,000) (325) (728) (2,075) (12,458) 2020 (4,461) (50) (126) (821) (628) - (725) (381) (2,605) (9,797) 2021 (4,392) (669) (122) (962) (335) - - (306) (85) (6,871) IT cost (19) Total Cost by Source (33,550) (2,828) (771) (6,525) (3,586) (5,775) (1,607) (2,335) (9,222) (66,180) ` 12/31/2021 Balance 22,771 2,932 - 4,564 5,729 3,181 3,620 3,225 3,427 49,449 (1) Utility Fund cash reserved for Sanitary Sewer and Street Light operations and Utility repairs on Local Street improvements. (2) Actual cash balance as of 12/31/2015 is $4,076K, but only cash required to finance CIP is shown, operating revenues and expenditures are excluded. (All Fund Summary) 2017-2021 Part III, Infrastructure (in thousands of dollars) CityMaint.Facility U.S.PostOffice Art House Dak. Co.Library Civic Arena FireStation#1 FireSta. #3 Fire Sta. #4 N. WaterTreat.Plant CommunityCenter Munic.CenterPolice Dept. Fire Station#2 S. WaterTrtmnt.Plant FireSta.#5 CascadeBay CaponiArt Park CarlsonLakePark FishLakePark Lexington DiffleyAthletic Facility Blackhawk Park Sky HillPark Woodhaven Park Peridot Path Carnelian Park CedarPond Park RiverHillsPark CinnamonRidgePark RahnPark MeadowlandPark DowningPark Highline Trail EvergreenPark Thomas LakePark HeinePond Park T. Lake East OakChasePark ClearwaterPark Ravine Park (undev.) Goat HillPark Walnut Hill Park TrappFarmPark Oak PondHills Park(undev.) Lebanon HillsRegional Park CampButwin GeorgeOhmannPark LakesidePark SouthOaksPark HolzFarmPark HiddenCornerPark Lebanon HillsRegional Park Ridgecliff Park KettleParkSlaterAcresPark Park(undev.) QuarryPark CentralPark MoonshinePark PilotKnobPark HighviewPark CountryHomePark F o r t S n e l l i n g S t a t e P a r k LexingtonPark O'Leary LakePark Wescott Commons ThresherFields BurOaksPark Barbara CurryPark (undev.) MuellerFarmPark BerryPatchPark PatrickEaganPark CaponiArt Park NorthviewPark WescottStationPark WanderingWalk Park(undev.) Bridle Ridge Park WindcrestPark (undev.) WanderingWalk Park (undev.) CaptainDodd Park WaldenHeights BridgeviewPark PortageLake CattailLake CoventryPond O'NeilPond Hurley Lake Min nesota River Gun Club Lake A l m q u i s t L a k e Wetland Banking Site Jensen Lake M c D o n o u g h L a k e Blackhawk Lake LeMayLakeGravel P i t L a k e S h a n a h a n L a k e SouthernLake FitzLake Cliff Lake HolzLake East Thomas Lake MooneyLake NorthLake BurOaksPond M arsh Lake O'Brien Lake Sch wanz Lake SchulzeLake HollandLake Hay Lake CarlsonLake Q u i g l e y L a k e HeinePond McCarthyLake BaldLake G e r h a r d t L a k e Fish Lake Thomas Lake B L O O M I N G T O N B U R N S V I L L E MENDOTA HEIGHTS APPLE VALLEY ROSEMOUN T I N V E R G R O V E H E I G H T S U N I O N P A C I F I C R A I L R O A D C O . C.P. RAIL SYSTEM §¨¦494 §¨¦35E §¨¦35E §¨¦35E $+32 $+32 !(43 !(43 !(28 !(28 $+26 $+26 $+31 $+31 $+31 !(30 !(30 !(30 ÕÇ13 ÕÇ13 ÕÇ55 ÕÇ55 ÕÇ149 ÕÇ149 ÕÇ149 ÕÇ3 ÕÇ3 ÕÇ77 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !!! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! !! !! ! !! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! A SHBURY ROAD AR GENTA TRAIL O'NE ILL DR. A M E S C R O S S I N G R D . NORTHWEST PKWY. L O N E OAK P A R K W A Y BLUE GENTIAN RD. B L U E W A T E R RD. GRANDOAKCIR.W. G R A N D O A K C I R . N . BEVERLYDR. KENNE TH S T. B EATRICE ST. McKEE ST.F I R S T S T . EAGAN INDUSTRIAL ROAD E A G A N D A L E B L V D . TRA PP ROAD EAGAN INDUSTRIAL ROA D CORPORATE CENTER D R.COR PORATE CENTER CURVE AVA LON AVE. V I L A S L N . E A G A N W O O D S D R . H IGH V IE W AVE.HIGH VIEW AVE. C ORP.CENT.DR. S OUTHRIDGEAVE. SKYLINE RDSKYLINEDR. S K Y L I N E D R . BRDGVW AVE . B R I D G E V I E W T E R R . H I G H V W T E R R . H I G H R I D G E T E R R . H I G H R I D G E T E R R . S I B L E Y H I L L S D R . S K Y L I N E C T . O S T E R D R STEPHA NIECIR.R USTIC HILLS DR. S K Y LINE PATH T R . RD. VINCE T R . RAINIE R LN. EGAN A V E. E G A N B U R N S I D E A V E . I N L A N D R D B E A M L N . M c C A R T H Y R D . L O O N L N . C H E R R Y W O O D C T . P I N E R I D G E D R . W O O D L A R K L N . TOWE RV IEW RD.TOWERVIE W RD.RED C EDAR RD. S H I E L D S D R . F AIR LA W N P L. F A R N U M DR. P O P P L E R L A N E W EST S ERVICE R O A D E A G A N D A L E C T . E A G A N D A L E B L V D . E A G A N D A L E D E N M A R K A V E . CLUBVIEW DR. C E N T E R C T . K EEFE ST. L O N E O A K C I R . WATERS ROA D C O M M ER S D R I V E L U N A R L N . APOLLO ROAD LONE OAK ROAD LONE OAK DRIVE A M E S C R O S S I N G R D . H O L I D A Y L N . COURTHOUSE LN. ROLLING HILLS CIR. B L A C K O A K D R . R O L L I N G H I L L S D R . R O L L I N G H I L L S P L . ROLLING HILLS DR. ROLLINGHILLSCT. R E D O A K D R .REDOAKCT. 77thST.W. 77th ST.W. HILLSIDE DRIVE HILLSIDECT. CHAPE L C T .CHAPE L LN.L O U I S L N .SALLY C I R . R A N D O M R D . J O Y C E C T . R O L L L N . W R E N L N . A D V A N T A G E L N . BORCHERTLN. N E I L A R M S T R O N G B L V D . M I K E C O L L I N S D R . ALDRIN DR. GEMINI RD. L E X I N G T O N A V E . N O R T H W D C I R . NORTHWOOD PKWY. D E N M A R K A V E .QUA RRY L N . Q U A R R Y C T . JURDY ROAD J U R D Y CT. N O . S O .M A R I C E C T . M ARICE DR. NORTHWOOD PKWY. H I G H SITE DR.A L D E N P O N D L N . FOUR OAKS RD. M EA DOW V IE W RD. ALEXANDER RD. LETENDRE ST. T E R M I N A L D R . YANKEE DOODLE RD. Y A N K E E D R . H E R I T A G E L N . D O N A L D A V E . PLACE K U T O F F C T . OPPE RMA N DR. WESCOTT SQ. T R A I L S E NDTRAIL CT. I V Y L N . IVY CT. IVY L A N E R D. G R E A T OAKS TR. G R E A T O A K S P L . GRE AT OA KSLN. WOODLAND CT. WOODLAND TR. T H O R W O O D C T . WILD ROSE CT. W O L F B E R R Y C T . C O L U M B I A D R . W E S C O T T W O O D L A N D S GOLFVIEW D R . P R O M E N A D E A V E . D IS CO VERY RD O 'L E A R Y L N . D U C K W O O D TR. D E N M A R K A V E . D E N M A R K A V E . T O W N C E N T R E D R .TOWN CE NTRE DR. YANK EE P L. M E R G A N S E R C T . W I D G E O N W A Y S P O O N B I L L C I R . K I T T I W A K E C I R . DUCKWOOD DR.DUCK WOOD DR. S H E R M A N C T . NORWE ST C T . C E N T R A L PKWY. QUARRY RD.D O N A L D C T . CENTURY P T. C O A C H M A N R O A D BLACKHAWK RD. C O MAN CHE RD. K E N N E B E C D R . SHAWNEERD. BL AC K HAWK R D . JOURDAN C T .RED FOX R D . B L U E C R O S S R O A D ROBIN LN. D EER PONDCIR. CRE STR IDGE LN. M ON TERE Y LN. KYLLO LN.K N O L L R I D G E D R . TERRA GLENNCT. SENECA RD. K E N N E B E C D R I V E B I R C H P O N D R D . BIR C H PO N DPL. B L A C K H A W K C O V E COACHMAN R D . HUNT DR. B I R C H P O N D R D . B L A C K H A W K HILLS RD. ASHBURY P L . S T . C H A S P L . PARK P L. BO AR D W AL K B A L T I C A V E . PACIFICAVE. ASHBURY CT. L A K E V I E W C U R V E L A K E V I E W TR. LEM IEUX CIR. S U R R E Y H E I G H T S DR.W A S H I N G T O N D R I V E 81stST. F E D E R A L D R . VIOLET LA NE FEDERA LCT. B L K H W K . L A K E DR. L A K E V I E W CUR .ENGLERT ROAD C R E S T R I D G E D R . C R E S T R I D G E C T . K R E S T W O O D L N . B L K H W K R I D G E W A Y CRESTRIDGE LN. P I N E C R E S T C T . K O L S T A D R D . C R O S S R O A D C T . TANANGER CT. F L I C K E R C I RTIMBER S H O R E LN.M O U R N I N G D O V E C T . W ID GEON WAYWDTHRSH C T . K IN GLETCT. B L U E H E R O N C T . B A L D E A G L E C T . D U C K W O O D T R . F A L C O N WAY DENMARKCT.E . KOLSTADLN. BLUE JAY W A Y HUMMINGBIRDLN. B L U E J A Y C T . B L U E JAY WAY F A L C O N W A Y E L R E N E R D . GREATOAKSCIR.PROMONTORYPL. ARBORCT. BE TTY LN. S U N W O O D T R . SUNCRS TCT. T A N G L E W O O D C T . S U N W O O D C T . B A S S W O O D L N . WESCOTT H I L L S D R . W O O D L A N D T R . OVERLOOK PL.E L R E N E C T . SOUTHHILLSLN.W N D T R C T . W N D T R C I R . WINDTREE DR. RIDGEWOOD D R . A R G E N T A T R . A R G E N T A T R . TYNE LN. W O R . C I R . C H A T H A M R D . F A I R H A V E N R D . W O R C H E S T E R D R . NORTHBR.CT. B.RDG.RD. B.RDG. CIR. W N D T R . K N O L L S T O N E W O O D R D . STNWD.CT.BRENTWOOD L N . SADDLE WOODDRIVE S.H.WAY B A Y B E R R Y L N . L I N D E N L N . LINDEN CT. S.H.CIR. S O U T H HILLS DR. SOUTH H.CT. M I L L R U N C T . B R I D G E W A T E R D R . M I L L R U N L N . MILL RUNCIR. HIDDEN MEADOWTR. Q U A IL RDG RD.H U N T E R S O V L K . B R I A R W D L N . G R E E N S B O R O DRIVECROSSRD. G.B O R O CT. G .B O R O L N . CA RDINAL W A YCANARY W A YWILLBROOK C T . WOOD CLIFFCT. HYL A N DCT. S T A N W I X R D . STONY POINTRD.DANBURYCT. B RIAR CR EEK R D. K ETTLE CREEK RD. P R I N C E T O N C I R . SAVANNAH RD.DANB URY T R . GLACIERDR. DE NMA RKTR.E.D E N M A R K C T .W . D E N M A R K T R .W . DEERCLIFFCT. D EERCLIFF L N . WINDCREST AV E. W I N D C R E S T C T . DRESDENCT.D R E S D E N W A Y W E S T B U R Y DR. W.BURY PATH W .B U R Y L N . W.BURYCIR. CIVIC C E N T E R D R . D R E X E L C T . B RAUN CT.K I N G S W O O D P O N D S R D . E A S T P O N D R D . KINGS W O O D R D .K I N G S W O O D L N . K.W. CT. B.R ID G E CI R. BLKHRIDGEPL. BLAC KHAWK L A K E D R . B L A C K H A W K L A K E C T .BLKHWK RIDGE CT. BLACK HAWKLAKEPL. B L A C K H A W K P T . SKATERCIR. B R O W N B E A R T R . BURGUNDYDR. SILVE R BE LL RD. RIVE RTON AVE. L A U R E L C T . HEATHER D R . W I L L O W W A Y S I L V E R B E L L C I R . L O D E STONECIR.L O D E S T O N E L N . COUNTRY C R E E K W A Y PALISA DE CIR. PALISADE PT. COCHRA NE AVE. C O C H.AVE . RIVTN .CIR.SERP ENTIN E DR .D O L O M I T E D R . C I N N A B A R D R . A L D E R L N . GOLD P T. GOLD TR. SILVER B E L L ROAD N I C O L S R O A D E A G A N O U T L E T S P K W Y N I C O L S R D . T . H . 7 7 SIBLEY CT. C E D A R G R O V E P K W Y D I A M O N D P T . J A D E P T . G A R N E T P T . S APP HIRELN. G A R N E T D R . B L U E STONE LN. FLINTLN. F L I N T D R . D R .CARNELIAN LN. JADE LN.EMERALD LN. B E R Y L R O A D T U R Q U O I S E T R . C A L C I T E D R . P U M I C E C T . PUM I C E LN. CINNA BAR CT. TAC ONITE TR. PUM ICE PT. P U M I C E L N .M I C A T R A I L O L I V I N E D R . A M E T H Y S T L N . L I M O N I T E C I N N A B A R D R . CARNE LIA N LN. JA DE LN. GABBRO TR. GOLD CT. S E R . C I R . B L A C K H A W K R D . T U R Q .P T . T U R Q . C I R . P E R I D O T P A T H TAC.TR . T A C . P T . M A G N E T I T E P T . HALITE L N . E .BLUESTONE DR . CARNELIAN LN. DAVE NPORT AV. BHWK. CIR. SARTELL AV E. DEE RWOOD DR. M ONTICE LLOAVE. DV NPT. CIR. N I C O L S R O A D D I A M O N D D R .O L D S I B L E Y M E M .H W Y . O L D S I B L E Y H W Y . T O P A Z D R . Z IRCON LN. OPALDR.OPAL PL. GARNET LN. G L E N F I E L D C T . D U R H A M C T . B E A VERDAM R D . N .R U B Y CT. S .R U B Y C T. KATHRYN CIR. MEADOWLARKRD. R D . SOUTH R I V E R T O N A V E . D O N EGAL GALWAY LN. D O N E G A L C T . HARBOURPT. TRAMORE PL.WAY MURP HY P A R K W A YHAWK PL. G R E Y S T O N E R I D G E O A K B R O O K E WAY O A K B R K C T . O A K B R K TR. S K Y W O O D L N . J .C .R .L N . JOHNNYCAKERIDGECT. J O H N N Y C A K E R D G R D J.C.R.WAY OAKBRK D R . O A K B R K C I R . O A K B R K C U R . O AK BRKLN. JOHNNY CAKEALCOVE T E R R A C E OAKBRK. O A K B R K . A L C O V E W E N Z E L A V E . K I N G S C R E S T L N . CUTTE RS LN. C L I P P E R S R D . P A L O M I N O T R . DEERWOOD DRIVE P A D D O C K C T . ROCKY L N . A P P A L O O S A T R . H O R S E S H O E C I R . D E E R W O O D T R A I L D E E R W O O D P L . DE ERWOODCT. DRWD PATHCASHELL G L E N K N O B D R . S I G N A LP T . D E N M A R K A V E . CRES TVIE WLN. DEER RID GECT. VERSAILLES CT. M I C H E L L E DR. DEERWOOD DRIVE WESTBURY KNOLL WES TB URY W A Y W .B U R Y T R . DR. P R I N C E T O N T R . G I B R A L T A R T R . TICONDER OGA TR. NORTHVIEW PARK RD.C L I N T O N T R . B O S T O N C I R . B O S T O N C T . N E W T O W N C T . H ILL RD.K N O L L W D C T . O A K C T . N O R T H R I D G E D R . O V E R L O O K C T . B I G T I M B E R T R . NORTHVIEW N O R T H V I E W T E R R . NORTHVIEW DR. T E R R . L E X I N G T O N W A Y G O V E R N C I R . B A L D L A K E C T . B . W A T E R D R . T R O T T E R S C T . M ILL RUN PATH TROTTERS RIDGE C.GLEN CIR. C . G L E N L N .C A N T E R G L E N D R. BR. R D G. ROAD B . R D G . R D . B. R D G .R D . B R I D L E R D G . RD. B .R D G . R D .B.RDG.RD. B R O C K T O N CIR.ELRENE R D . WIND MILLCT. CAST L ET O N CT. STONE B R D G LN.HAV EN H I L L R D . D R .STONEBR.CIR. B R OC KTO N C U R V E CAMPTONCT. S T O N E B R . DR. N. FROMMECT.M E R S E Y W A Y K E N N E T C I R . A Z A L E A WAY ESK LN.THAMESCIR.HANOVERCT.E D E N C I R .M E R S E Y P T . COVENTRY P K W Y .WAVENEYCT.SEVERN WAY A V A L O N P A T H AVALONCT. ESK L N .E S K C I R . TYNE LN.TYNECT. C O U N T R Y V I E W D R I V E COUNTRYCT. P RAIRIE CIR.E. AUTUMN COURT GRANITECT.G R A N I T E D R . B R A D F O R D P L .B. CIR.H A V E N H I L L C I R . A V O N C T . A R L E N E C T . LEONARDLN.WELLANDCT. WITHAM LN. WILDFL. WAY L A N T E R N C T . LANTER N LN. P R AIRIE CIR. W. P R A I R I E T H M S . A V E . R D G . R D . OAKS C O U N T R Y S I D E DRIVE E T H A N D R . JAC OB CT. OXFORD RD.CAM BE R W E L L C A M B E R W ELL S H O R T L I N E N O R T H V I E W P A R K R D . CHESHIRE CT. T I L B U R Y W A Y B A F F I N B A Y N . F O X M O O R E C T . B A R R O W C T . D R.N B A F F I N B A Y S .N.DR. ALBANY CIR. K I N G S T O N C T . P ENN SYLV A NIA AVE.V E R M O N T A V E. AVE. A V E . B R A D D O C K T R . N E W Y O R K A V E . PENNSYLVANIA V E N T N O R AVE. S T A T E S R E A DIN GDIFFLEYROAD H O S F O R D H I L L S D R . C H A T T E R T O N C T .CHATTERTON R D . BERRY R I D G E R D . H I L L T O P L N . S T R A W B E R R Y L N . RASPBERRYLN. B B .C T .B B .K N O L L BB.CIR. B L U E B E R R Y L N . R .C T .A M B E R LEA F TR. METCALF D R. M E D A R Y A V E . CLARK ST.C L A R K C T . GLORY DR. N I C O L S R O A D CEDA R R ID GECIR. D I A M O N D D R . D I A M O N D D R . AM BERCT. A M B E R D R . L I M E S T O N E D R . MARBLELN.QUARTZLN.COPPER LN. C O P P E R P T . M E T C A L F D R . C ORA L LN. M O O N S T O N E D R . S A N D S T O N E D R . S HALE LA NE S HALE LN. JASPER DR. AMBER DR. S A N D S T O N E D R . O N Y X D R .O N Y X P T . CHIPM UNK C T. N . S. TIMBER WOLF TR. TIM BER W OLFTR. T I M B E R W O L F C T . BADGER CT. B E A R P A T H TR. B E A V E R D A M R D . BEAVER DAM CT. S U N R I S E R O A D S U N R I S E C T . B EAR PATH TR. S U N C L I F F R D . E A G L E C R E S T D R . DEER H I L L S T R . F O X R I D G E R D . FOXRIDGECT. B R A N T CIR. G A D W A L L C T . P I N T A I L C T . J O H N N Y C A K E R D G R D . W E X F O R D C I R . WEXFORD W A Y C L E M S O N C I R . W O O D G A T E L N .NO. CLEMSON DR. TE AL COVEW O O D D U C K C I R . NESTLING CIR. CANVASB ACKLN. DRAK E DR. W O O D G A T E P T . M A L L A R D C T . N.MALLARD T R . M A L L A R D P L . BAYLORCT. C L E M S O N D R . W E X F O R D C T . H E I N E C T . CLEM SON CT. T H O M A S L A K E R D . A U B U R N C T .PONDE ROSACIR. L O D G E P O L E D R . HEM LOCKCIR. H E I N E S T R A S S E S E Q U O I A D R . WA LFRID ST. L .P O L E C T . SIGFRID ST. BA LSAM ST. E .BA LS AM S T. EAS TER LN. CLEOM E LN. COSM OS LN. AM ARYLLISLN. WILD ERNES S RUN RD. E A S T E R L N . ST.E .S I G F R I D ST. N . S V E N S K L N . S V E N S K L N . G A R D E N T R . M A L M O C I R . N Y B R O C I R . W.R.CIR.W.R.CT. C A R L S O N L A K E L N . N. E .BALSAM TR. N .N Y B R O LN. N . M A L M O L N . D U N R O V I N L A N E E.BALSAM T R A I L D U N R O V I N P L . W I L D E R N E S S P A R K C I R . CARLSON L A K E L N . M A L M O P L . VILDMARKDR. W IL D E R NESS RUN D R .V . C T . L E X I N G T O N R I D G E O R I O N L N . AQUARIUS LN. A N D R O M E D A W A Y K A U F M A N I S W A Y C A P R I C O R N C T . W I L D P . C T . L Y R A C T . A R I E S C T . L E O C T . P AT R I C K R O A D T I F F A N Y C I R .N . T I F F A N Y C I R .S . T I F F A N Y DR. TRILLIUM CT. CONE FLOWER CT. WILDFLOWER CT. LEXINGTON POINTE P A R K W A YWALNUTRDGDR.W I L D F L . L N . J E N N I F E R C T . S E A N C T . J E S S I C A C T . M A T T H E W C T . H A M I L T O N HA MILTON D R . JEFFERS ON LA NE B R A D D O C K T R A I L C U R R Y T R . P T E . W A Y P A R K K N O L L D R . CUR RY TR. DANIEL DRIVE B R A D D O C K T R A I L R O G E R S C T . T R E N T O N T R A I L C O R N W A L L I S C T . YORKTOW N P LA CE F O R G E P L T R E N T O N R O A D MACLA REN PL.V A L L E Y HA CKMORE DR. Y O R K T O W N D R .A U G U S T A CT. S U N S E T D R . GOLDEN MEADO W RD.G .M . C T . A U G U S T A L N . S T I R R U P S T . CALVIN CT. LASS O LN. K I R S T E N C T . L Y N X C T . C O U G A R D R . S UMMERPL.SUMMER LN. S.CT. DR.HACKMORE D R. ( CO. RD. 30 ) R O S E M A R Y C T. ATLANTIC H I L L DR. CRIMS ON LEAF TR.C .L E A F C T . W E S T C H E S T E R C I R . H A W K S B U R Y C I R . HACKMORECT. D A R T M O U T H C T . HAW T H O R N E W O O D S D R . E A S T W O O D C T . D O R C H E S T E R C T . B E N T T R E E LN. H A C K M O R E D R . T O F T E L N . ALICIA C I R . A L I C I A D R . ALISON WAY M I C H I G A N C T . H U R O N C T .E R I E C T . S U P E R I O R C T .HAYLAKECT. N.HAY LAK ERD. S.HAY L A K E R D . OVERHILL RD. GREEN LE AF DR.N. G R E E N L E A F D R . E . G R E E N L E A F DR.S. G . L E A F W . A C O R N S T . M A J E S T I C O A K S P L . M A J E S T I C O A K S C T . R E I N D E E R L N .F A W N R I D G E T R . LY NX CT. W H I T E T A I L W A Y O A K P O N D C IR . N .H A Y L A K E R D . W H I T E T A I L W A Y C A R I B O U L N .O A K POND R D. SUDBE RRY LANEWATERFORDDR.E. W A T E R F O R D D R . W . W E D G W O O D D R .WEDGWOOD LN.NORTH WEDGWOOD LN.SOUTH B I R C H CRESTCIR. K I R K W D C I R . K I R K W D D R . C A N T E B U R Y C I R . M A P L E L E A F C I R . (C O .R D .4 3 )T I F F A N Y P L . TIFFANY CT. T I F F A N Y P T . C L I F F R I D G E C T . HORIZON CIR. P A R K V I E W L N . GAB.CIR. K I R K W OODDR. OAK C H A S E W A Y O A K C H A S E R D . O A K C H A S E L N . O A K C H A S E C I R . WILDERNESS LN.C H E S M A R C I R . L A K E S I D E D R . L A K E S I D E C I R . R I D G E V I E W D R . C H E S M A R L N . C H E S M A R D R . WILD E R N E S S C U R V E OAKLEAFCIR. D U N . C I R . D U N BERRY LN. T H O M A S L A K E R O A D L A K E P A R K C T . L A K E P A R K C I R . L A K E P A R K D R . M A L L A R D V I E W S .MA LLARD T R . MALLARD D R . H I C K O R Y H I L L HICKORY LN. WALNUT L N . WALNUT CT. M A L L A R D C I R . WOODGATELN. T H O M A S CEN TER D R . W L N T C I R . H I C K O R Y H I L L H I C K O R Y H I L L W O O D G A T E P T . W O O D G A T E C T . W A L N U T LANE B EECHE R DR .C L O V E R L N .C L O V E R LN. W A L N U T LANE L E N O R E L N . C L I F F L A K E ROAD CLIFF D R. SCOT T T R. CLIF FHILL LN. CLIF FV IEW DR. C L I F F V I E W D R . P A R K CENTE R D R . ERIN D R. E R I N DR. E R I N L N .C I N N A M O N R I D G E T R . S L A T E R R D . S L A T E R R D . W H I T E O A K C T . MAHOGANY WAY WARRICK CT. H I G H C R O F T C T . JAM ES S T .B U R R O A K S T . O A K C L I F F D R . JAM ES ST. J A M E S C T .S LATE RCT. N I C O L S R O A D NAN CY CIR. O A K W A Y VIB URNUM TR. KINGS RD. VIENNA LA NE P IN OAK DR . TRVLRS TR. W H I S P . C T . W H I S P . T R . F O U R S E A S O N S DR. F O U R S E A S O N S C T . W A L L S T .W O O D S C T . S T O R L A N D C T . R U S T E N R D . S TORLAND RD. E STATESDR. J A M I E R O S E C T . W H I S P E R I N G W A Y R U S T E N R D MARILYNAVE. G E N E V A L N . R O Y A L E C T .ROYALE DR. R O Y A L E P L . R O Y A L E T R A I L R O Y A L E W A Y S A F A R I HEIGHTS TR. S A F A R I P A S S S A F A R I T R. S A F A R I C T .S . S A F A R I C T .N . S A F A R I C I R . G A L A X I E A V E . S K Y V I E W C T . COVINGTON LN. B E R K S H I R E DR.B . C T . B . W A Y P O N D - V I E W D R .W IND TR. WIN D T R . RID GE W E ST TA M PE RE CIR. F L O R A D R . NARVIK DR. N A R V I K C T .SENJA CT. RAHN WAY RAHNC LIF FCT. R A H N C L I F F R D . P L A Z A D R . E L L I E C T . KARIS W A YLENORE L N . NOK IA WAY NOKIA W AY H A L D E N C I R . BAM BLECIR. P E L L O C I R . C O V I N G T O N LN. F O R S S A W A Y H A U G E C I R .COVINGTON LN. P E N K W E WAY R I D G E C L I F F E D R . P E N K W E C I R . P E N K W E W A Y S H E V L I N C T . S HERWOOD WAY N O R W O O D D R . N O R . C T . S H E F . C I R . S H E F F I E L D L N . NOR. CIR. SHER. CT. BE ACONHILLCIR. W I N D S O R C T . C V I N G T N . C T . C V I N G T N . C I R . L O N D O N L N . W E S T M I N S T E R C I R . KNOTTINGHAM CIR. WELLINGTONCT. SHERWOODWAY PIN ETREE PASS P I N E T R E E TRA IL BEA CONHILLCT. B E A C O N H I L L R D . L N . K I N G S B U R Y D R . LANCAS TER LN. C A M B R I D G E D R . S T O N E C L I F F E D R . S U M M I T P A S S STONE C L I F F E D R. THOMAS LN. PINE T R E E C U R . W A L D E N D R . WELLINGTON WAY S T P L C H A S E W A Y R E B E C C ALN . E R I K 'S B L V D . R I C H A R D L N . DOLORES LN. T H O M A S L N . S T P L C H A S E C T . STPLCHASE LN. S T P L C H A S E C I R . RICHARD'S CT. A NDREW S T . CAMELBACKDR. S T . ANDREW BLVD F A I R W A Y H I L L S D R . INTERLACHEN DR. H A Z E L T I N E L N . C Y P R E S S P T . GRACE DR. P E B B L E B E A C H W A Y PARKCLIFFD R. P .R I D G E C T . PARKRIDGE D R . McFADDENS TR. D O D D R O A D McFADDENS T R . I S A B E L L E C T . S HELERUDDR. WOOD LA ND WAY ROSA CT. P I N E C O N E T R . P IN ECONECIR.M A N O R DR. SWEETST. A LLA N LN . MIDDLELN. TOD D AVE . T A M I E A V E . W E S T O N HILLS CT. A P E N I N E W A Y B R I S T O L B L V D . S T R A T F O R D L N . W ESTONHILLS P L.H I L L S D R . S Y C A M O R E C T . W E S T O N WHITE P INE WAY WHITEPINEWAY S Y C A M O R E D R . P I N E L A N E SP RUCE ST. GUN CLUB RD. B I S C A Y N E A V E . WATERVIEWCOVEREDPINE LN. MARS H CT. WATERVIEWTR. FARM RD. RED P O L L C T. RED P I N E CT.RED P I N E LANE 120th S T. D O D D R O A D PARK S I D E CIR. P.SIDECT.S P R U C E C I R . B R O O K L Y N L N . T W I N S C T . B I S C A Y N E A V E . 120th ST.W. CAY LINCT. B R O O K LY N CT. CLIFF RD DIFFLEY RD YANKEE DOODLE RD H W Y 1 4 9 H W Y 3 L E X I N G T O N A V E P I L O T K N O B R D H W Y 7 7 H W Y 1 3 I - 3 5 E HWY 55 I - 494 P I L O T K N O B R D LONE OAK RD CLIFF RD P A L I S . W A Y STATION TR S P R I N G W D P A T H S P R I N G W O O D C T .MAPLE TRAILCT. W D C R S T C I R . S A W G R A S S T R L S . S A W G R A S S T R L E . S A W G R A S S T R L W . AUTUMNCIR. M O N A R C H TRL CHE STNUTLN S A W G R A S S T R L W . SAWGRASSTRLE. BLACK W O L F R U N CROOKED STICKCT. EAG L E P T.DR. Q U A I L C R E E K C I R . S H A D O W C R K C U R . L E G E N D S C T . D A K O T A P A T H RITA CT. J U S T I C E W A Y F E NW A Y R V V L Y W A Y LIVI N G S T O N D R S . H A Y L K T H A M E S A V E . PRAIRIEDUNESWAYWINGEDFOOTTR INTERLACH EN D R B R O O K V I E W C T . HOPE DR k k k k k k k k " " " " " k k k k k k k k k k k ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") !( !( ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") XW XW XW XW ") ") ") "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ "/ #* #* #*#* kj kj kjkjkj kj kj kj kjkj kj kj kj kj kj Well #14Rehabilitate ('17) Well #4Rehabilitate ('17) Well #9Rehabilitate ('17) Well #17 SCADARenewal ('17) Apollo L.S.EP-1/EP-2 LS CapacityImprovements Well #3 SCADARenewal ('17) Rustic Hills & Hwy 13(960 ft.) Well #2 SCADARenewal ('17) Water ReuseInfrastructure ('17) Donald AveWatermain Replacement ('17) Trunk Sewer Upgrade NWA 1 NII 1.1 New SanitaryDump Station New Well HouseInstallation Reservoir InspectionSafari ('17) J-4065 J-4035 J-3825 NII 1.2 NII 1.3 Ashbury L.S. Rehabilitation River Hills 9thAddition (3,964 ft.) Cedar Grove 2nd & 4thRahn Road (2,453 ft.) Well #1Electric System Rehabilitate ('17) Well #20 SCADARenewal ('17) JP-47New Outlet Structure AP-8 Grading, Piping,Wetland Bank NW Parkway Trunk Watermain Extentions PRS on Highbridge ('17) J-4060 NII 1.4 Louis Lane L.S.SCADA Renewal/Update Country Hollow L.S.SCADA Renewal/Update Pond AP-42 Improvements Ponds LP-26.3, LP-26.4, LP-26.5 Improvements Lake LP-26 Fitz Lake Alum Treatment Pond JP-19 Sediment Removal Pond JP-30.6 Sediment Removal Fish Lake Alum Treatment Pond GP-1.2 Improvements City of Eagan2017 CIP XW Intersection Improvement(4) kj Streetlight Improvement(15) #*Signal Improvement(4) "/Parking Lot Improvements(10) ")Streets - Utility Site Improvement(18) ")Sanitary Facility/Operation Improvements(3) ")Storm Facility/Operation Improvements(3) ")Water Facility/Operation Improvements(11) !(Storm Trunk Improvements(1) !(Water Trunk Improvements(1) Collector - New(1) Local - New(1) Collector - Overlay(1) Local - Overlay(38) Collector - Resurface(8) Local - Resurface(13) k k Water Trunk - New(1) ""Water - Facility/Operation Improvement(1) k k Sanitary Trunk - New(1) Trail - Overlay(28) Sanitary - Lining(35) Water Quality(7) P r o g r a m Y e a r 2 0 1 7 Ê 0 2,000 4,000Feet Street, Utility & Water Quality Improvements Prepared By: Eagan Public Works Dept.Updated: 5/6/2016Document Path:L:\USERS\PUBWORKS\Projects\Maintenance\CIP\NextYearProjects_.mxd Agenda Information Memo May 10, 2016 Special City Council Workshop VII. Transportation, Utilities, Water Quality Plan Updates Direction For Consideration: Receive an update on draft 2017 Budget items for various supplemental plan updates in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan update. Facts:  Every 10 years, the City Council adopts an updated Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (MLPA). The MLPA requires all local governments in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area to develop comprehensive plans. This officially adopted long-range plan describes the community’s vision for the future. The plan assesses the issues and opportunities it will face in the next 20 years and discusses how the community will plan for them.  By Statute, plans must include specific components which are consistent with the Metropolitan Council’s Regional Development Framework. The Comprehensive Plan accounts for numerous elements including the following three: o Natural Resources o Transportation o Community Infrastructure  The Public Works Department typically oversees the preparation of more specific plans to facilitate the compilation of these three components of the Comprehensive Plan, including the following: o Water Quality and Wetland Management Plan o Transportation Plan o Water Supply and Distribution Plan o Comprehensive Sewer Plan o Storm Water Management Plan  City staff is anticipating completion of the update of the Comprehensive Plan in 2018. In order to meet this schedule, Public Works staff has scheduled completion of the updated plans in 2017.  Public Works staff have received proposals from their consultants to prepare said various plans as has been done in the past. The cost of each of the plan preparation proposals is significant. Each of the proposals includes modeling of the various systems, from phosphorus reduction in lakes to projected traffic flows to anticipated sewer and water demands throughout the city.  Staff has also requested a proposal for a new integrated water master plan that would address water reuse and look at the water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer as possibly interrelated components of one system.  As is the case in many aspects of our lives, technology is enhancing our quality of life by helping us to better plan for the future of the city. In this case, while the benefit appears to justify the cost, the cost is significant and, as something that is only experienced once every ten years, a big pill to swallow.  A summary of the proposed costs for each of the plans follows. o Water Quality and Wetland Management Plan $48,000 o Transportation Plan $38,000 o Water Supply and Distribution Plan $99,000 o Comprehensive Sewer Plan $79,000 o Storm Water Management Plan $97,000 o Integrated Water Master Plan $59,000  Total Cost Estimate $420,000 Attachments: (0)