Loading...
01/20/2005 - City Council Finance Committee (2)RIMS CITY COUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING THURSDAY JANUARY 20, 2005 7:30 A.M. EAGAN CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOMS 2A & 2B I. AGENDA ADOPTION II. DISCUSS FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT • Review Requirements and Expectations of Land Assembly • Development Agreement Deal Points • Current Property Ownership Status • Traffic Study/AUAR Update • Other III. DISCUSS OVERALL FINANCING TO INCLUDE STATUS OF TIF AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT • Review TIF "Pooling" Options IV. FUTURE MEETING TOPICS • Market Feasibility — Comparison of Maxfield Study, AUAR Traffic and Schafer Richardson -Ryland Plan • Update Status of Grant Opportunities V. OTHER BUSINESS Vi. ADJOURNMENT CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT FINANCING CONSIDERATIONS January 20, 2005 Five Different Funds/Projects: 1. TIF 2. Project 880 -Double Left Turn Lanes TH-13 3. Project 759R -Cedar Grove Parkway 4. Project 866 -Cedar Grove Streetscape 5. Project 800R -Cedar Grove Access Modifications Currently Proposed To Be Financed By: 1. TIF Revenues 2. Land Sales 3. Special Assessments 4. Major Street Fund 5. State Grant Agreement 6. CDBG 7. Trunk Funds 8. Utility Enterprise Fund Potential Additional Financing Sources: 1. Ad Valorem G. O. Bonds 2. TIF Pooling 3. Other Financing Challenges: 1. Uncertain Costs 2. Uncertain Amount and Timing of Revenues 3. Relationship Between Assessments and Future Tax Increment Resulting From Redevelopment (Double Counting the Revenue) 4. Assessments on Property Not Proposed For Redevelopment 5. Cedar Grove Area Benefit in Relation to Community Benefit 6. Other Public Policy Direction: 1. Assessment Hearing 2. Major Street Fund Obligation 3. Use of Additional Financing Sources 1 U Q O E CL U 0 > a) 0 2 o O y; N Q c0Co N N o cn ca - c LL U C d O .o O ON Co ami 3 �. '0 — " N U O !cn� cn 7 O LL CT +J � U � U) 1-- �p O �' 'm O' 'IT 00 O O M M LO O M p -- N S M N O O O U') U) I- c0 C:) 00 Ld 00 T M U) rte+ 'IT _O COO M N O O O O CO LO' � V- O I- Lf N `- 1- M U) r N EA GR tf? 69 O O M CO co 0 LO O r O C > p ' 000 (� O M co O 0= O 00 d 00 ;10 00 L.4 N) °�° Co LO c0 C) 000 U 0 a 0 + S\ d p > CY)N U) CA 0) Cr) P CL to co �> rnN oma Lo d V N N V i� O c M CM cop LO O L a O U ya CY) M O1- M > >w0 M N in (D M LO O c0 cn i 00 r- N 00 r O COM Ili 0 V NM 000 a"D a o v a` ++ M d U7 M U) O LO 000 Ji 0 M O M r d O 0 O O M O O U) LO 0~0 (Y) aoEo oma ( 6-1 6n, y O O M 00 ch O Ci O cfl rn i lf) O M Ld LO m m 0 M N 04 a.N d U LL p 0 m 0 o d in> L U a) > 0 `000 �� U- a E a) c a0) aa)i m 0 a 0) a) a0i .aLL 0 0 U U) U) 0 0 Q �j m` c Co 0 a) a0) 0) a0) 0 m coo S 0 �w�c°��aQaa�v)�L=cu O oIL U Q O E CL U 0 > a) 0 2 o O y; N Q c0Co N N o cn ca - c LL U C d O .o O ON Co ami 3 �. '0 — " N U O !cn� cn 7 O LL CT +J � U � U) 1-- �p O �' 'm TIF Fund 14 -Jan -05 Financing Sources CDBG Grant $ 310,000 Land Sale -Keystone 941,643 Land Sales-Nicols Ridge 1,013,000 Land Sale -US Homes-Lachenmayer 269,000 TIF Total Financing Sources $ 8,255,918 Total asssessments currently agreed to be paid from TIF 1,031,594 - Total TIF currently required to balance the account 3 Cedar Grove TIF 9334 Project Costs Land $ 5,309,402 Interest 554,076 Professional Fees -Legal and Engineering 586,335 Park and Trail Dedication -Keystone 216,462 Other Costs 30,032 Additional Easement Costs 97,191 Nicols Ridge Fees 430,826 Assessments Project 800R -Nichols Ridge 922,891 Assessments Project 759R -Nichols Ridge 108,703 Total Project Costs $ 8,255,918 Financing Sources CDBG Grant $ 310,000 Land Sale -Keystone 941,643 Land Sales-Nicols Ridge 1,013,000 Land Sale -US Homes-Lachenmayer 269,000 TIF Total Financing Sources $ 8,255,918 Total asssessments currently agreed to be paid from TIF 1,031,594 - Total TIF currently required to balance the account 3 Project 880 --Double Left Turn Lanes TH-13 Project Costs Contract Estimate or Final 40% or Actual Other Costs on Projects Total Project Costs Financing Sources Major Street Fund State Cooperative Agreement Funding Total Financing Sources i❑ 14 -Jan -05 Double Left Turns TH-13 Project 880 $ 621,661 248,664 $ 870,325 $ 330,325 540,000 $ 870,325 Project 759R --Cedar Grove Parkway 14 -Jan -05 Cedar Grove Parkway 759R Project Costs Contract Award or Estimate $ 400,494 40% or Actual Other Costs on Projects 224,862 Final Project 759R Costs $ 625,356 Trailway 268,947 Total Project Costs $ 894,303 Financing Sources Enterprise Fund $ 181,217 Trunk Funds 32,144 Assessments Project 759R -Nichols Ridge (By TIF) 108,703 Assessments Project 759R -Other 201,581 Major Street Fund 370,659 Total Financing Sources $ 894,303 Potential request for at least some TIF assistance on redevelopment parcels. 5 Project 866 --Cedar Grove Streetscape Project 800R --Cedar Grove Access Modifications Cedar Grove Cedar Grove Access Streetscape Modifications 866 800R Project Costs Contract Estimate or Final $ 939,992 40% or Actual Other Costs on Projects 375,997 Conversion from Overhead to Underground Utilities 250,534 Total Project Costs $ 1,566,523 Financing Sources Trunk Funds Assessments -Nichols Ridge Assessments -Development Assessments -Other Assessments -Keystone Major Street Fund Total Financing Sources Potential request for at least some TIF assistance on redevelopment parcels. =Potential drain on Major Street Fund resources impacting other City projects. 307,965 30,619 274,671 28,229 $ 1,566,523 u 14 -Jan -05 Total $ 2,548,793 $ 3,488,785 1,349,586 1,725,583 - 250,534 $ 3,898,379 $ 5,464,902 $ 571,884 $ 571,884 614,926 922,891 61,138 91,757 548,445 823,116 56,366 84,595 $ 3,898,379 $ 5,464,902 O(D LO ti O O N _M LO O N +r M N E R r.- d z E N N d N N EF? Q � O co (C� N ti N N ti C T N M (D M a M r O N U d a `- 60, ° � rn o � LO _ m o 0) LO w «° n 04 Ln O O L L O M CLO Q Q dLO C O Ln00 011 �t 41 + , E - M Z N a S� o CA LO y�LO a0° d0 d 0 J amH LA V d 0- L. IL R M O 01 LO N r 6R O T M O N ti V' r ch N co N r � N 00 N LO ti O co �s,ll / 2 '� ✓ C4 CN EH ,It LO MI LO co LO EiT � r �D O V- N R E O a N E R °a d z E N N d N N Q O O O O O LA V d 0- L. IL R M O 01 LO N r 6R O T M O N ti V' r ch N co N r � N 00 N LO ti O co �s,ll / 2 '� ✓ C4 CN EH ,It LO MI LO co LO EiT � r �D O V- N