10/10/2006 - Airport Relations CommissionAGENDA
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
EAGAN ROOM
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2006
5:30 P.M.
I. PHASE I — PHASE II COMPARISON NOISE STUDY
- Study review with Orfield Laboratories
EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2006
7:00 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
IV. VISITORS TO BE HEARD
V. OLD BUSINESS
A. Communications Update
B. MAC Monthly Reports - Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis,
Technical Advisory Report, 17-35 Departure Analysis Report
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Phase I -Phase II Comparison Noise Study .
B. City Comprehensive Plan — Airports & Aviation Chapter
VII. STAFF/COMMISSION UPDATE
A. MSP Noise Oversight Committee Update
B. Home Sales & Home Sales Price Survey
C. Proposed MAC Representation Legislation
D. Noise Oversight Committee Airport Noise Public Input
E. Next Meeting: Tuesday, October 10, 7 p.m.
VIII. ROUNDTABLE
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a
notice of less than 96 hours is received, the city of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid
fr
City of Eagan
TO: CHAIR. THORKILDSON
COMMISSION
MEMO
AND THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS
FROM: JASON ZIEMER, ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN
DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2006
SUBJECT: AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING / AUGUST 8, 2006
The Eagan Airport Relations Commission is invited to attend the Eagan City Council at 5:30 p.m. on
Tuesday, October 10, 2006 in the Eagan Room to listen to a presentation from Orfield Laboratories on the
phase I -phase II comparison analysis study.
The regular commission meeting will follow at 7:00 p.m. in the Eagan City Council Chambers. In order
that we have a quorum present, please contact Mary Swenson at (651) 675-5005 if you are unable to
attend this meeting.
I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA
The agenda, as presented or modified, is in order for adoption by the Commission.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Augu, t 8, 2006 and September 14, 2006 Airport Relations Commission are enclosed
on pages � through r. These minutes, as presented or modified, are in order for adoption by the
Commission.
III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD
The Eagan City Council and its Commissioners set aside up to 10 minutes at the beginning of public
meetings to permit visitors to address items of interest that are not scheduled on the regular agenda. Items
that will take more than 10 minutes or that require specific action can be scheduled for a future agenda.
IV. OLD BUSINESS
A. Communications Update — It is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to discuss their
communication initiatives each month, which include articles in the Experience Eagan newsletter, stories
aired on the city's local access cable channels, and inclusions in the ARC Notebook.
If any of the Commissioners have suggestions for additional communication initiatives in the city
regarding airport issues, please submit those suggestions at this time.
0
B. MAC Monthly Reports — Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis/Technical Advisory
Report/ Runway 17-35 Departure Analysis Report — Enclosed on pages throdu h %S7 is the
August 2006 Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis Report. Enclosed on pages l throug lis
the August 2006 Technical Advisory Report. Enclosed on pages through is the August 2006
Runway 17-35 Departure Analysis Report. The August reports are the most current reports available on
the MAC Web site. It is the practice of the Commission to review the reports and discuss any significant
deviations that may have occurred or any other noteworthy occurrences as reported in the analysis.
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. Phase I -Phase II Comparison Noise Study — Elliott Dick, Orfield Laboratories, will present and
discuss the results from the phase I -phase II noise comparison study at the Special Eagan City Council
meeting at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 10 in the Eagan Room. Wyle Laboratories conducted the initial
noise study in June 2005, prior to the new north -south Runway 17/35 opening. The city hired Orfield
Laboratories to perform the follow up noise study, post -runway opening. That study was completed in
June 2006. The raw data collected during the phase II study showed little, if any, change from data
collected during the pre -runway study. Orfield was hired to compare and analyze results f om phase I and
hase II studies. The report from the phase I -phase II comparison study is found on pagesthrough
B. City Comprehensive Plan — Airports & Aviation Chapter — The City of E an is in the process
of reviewing and updating its comprehensive plan. Enclosed on pages through is the Airports
and Aviation Chapter. Airport relations commissioners should review the goals and policies of the
Airports and Aviation Chapter, and be prepared to make recommendations for the city council fo
consideration.
VI. STAFF/COMMISSION UPDATE
A. MSP Noise Oversight Committee
-190/200-Degree Heading Update — The FAA began testing 200 -degree heading on June 19,
2006, reporting that the heading will work. Implementation of the new flight heading is anticipated. City
of Burnsville continues pressing FAA to find a workable solution. FAA maintains position that operations
is in compliance with previous environmental documentation, including west departure headings ranging
between 095 -degrees to 285 -degrees. Tom Hansen, city of Burnsville, met with Chad Leqve, MAC, and
FAA regarding departure headings. Hansen reports the FAA keeping an open mind on use of Minnesota
River Valley for west departure flights. Another meeting between the city of Burnsville and the FAA is
tentatively scheduled for sometime in November. See memorandum on pages[, through 12/J for
more information.
- Builders Guide — MAC staff provided new Builders Guide from Met Council. Guide includes
new regulations pertaining to 60 DNL contours. Guide identifies 60 DNL or greater as incompatible for
development of single family units.
- New Flight Tract Data Collection & Reporting — MAC staff gathered information on new
technologies that would improve timely access to flight tract information. It currently takes a minimum 5 -
day delay to get data available. Two potential solutions would provide real-time flight track mapping
capabilities on the Web site, within 10 minutes. Installing a new system would cost between $300,000 to
$500,000, plus annual maintenance fees.
- 2007 NOC Work Plans — A preliminary agenda identifying discussion topics for 2007 was
presented at NOC meeting. See page for items. Eagan staff recommended the MSP NOC review and
discuss the Part 150 pertaining to flight tracts for Runway 17/35. MAC staff suggested that opportunity is
available in Assessment of Runway 17/35 Operations in 2007 work plan. ARC members also encouraged
to attend NOC meetings and testify on these matters during public hearings.
B. Home Sales & Home Sale Prices Survey — Commissioners requested information comparing
home sales and sale prices betty en Eagan and Inver Grove Heights and Mendota Heights. The tabulated
results are available on pagesthrough 19 Q. The Southern Twin Cities Association of Realtors
found homes in seven residential neighborhoods near remote monitoring towers took longer to sell. The
average sale price of homes was up, despite a dip in the median sales price. These numbers are
comparable to citywide home sales during the same period. The same was true of home sales in Inver
Grove Heights. Average and median home prices in Mendota Heights, Mendota, and Lilydale showed a
significant jump. The information does not include reasons why homeowners put their homes up for sale.
The ARC should consider having the Southern Twin Cities Association of Realtors conduct a follow up
survey of realtors to determine reasons why homes are placed on the market. The best time for the survey
would-be spring 2007.
C. Proposed MAC Representation Legislation - The city Noise Oversight Committee will meet on
October 18 to discuss and draft legislation enabling permanent city representation on the Metropolitan
Airports Commission. The Eagan Airport Relations Commission proposal includes: city membership
identified by the cities inside 60 DNL noise contour; addition of seats to the board, not reconfiguration of
seat assignments; and city representatives appointed by city councils. City councils will be asked to sign
off on agreed to legislation in November before submitting to legislature for drafting and jacketing of
legislation.
D. Noise Oversight Committee Airport Noise Public Input Meeting — The ARC and public can
receive updates on the NOC and its activities, operational levels, and procedures around the airport.
Meeting attendees may also provide comments and voice concerns on current airport noise issues and
future trends. The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 19, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. at MAC general
offices.
E. Next Airport Relations Commission Meeting — The next ARC meeting is November 14, 2006 at
7 p.m. in the council chambers.
VII. ROUNDTABLE
Per the request of the Commission, this agenda item has been added so that commissioners have the
opportunity to ask questions or make requests for future agenda items.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Per the request of the Commission, the Eagan Airport Relations Commission meetings will go no later
than 8:30 p.m. unless agreed upon by the Commission.
Yministrati4iIntern
3
MINUTES OF THE EAGAN
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING
AUGUST 8, 2006
A regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission was held on Tuesday, August 8,
2006 at 7:00 p.m. Those present were Curtis Aljets, Steve Beseke, Jason Bonnett, Justin Countryman, Jack
Prentice, Charles Thorkildson and Bret Walsh. Absent were Dean Haehnel and Tammy Mencel. Also
present was Jason Ziemer, Administrative Intern.
AGENDA
The agenda was amended to include an additional item under Staff Report — Decision by Judge re:
MAC. Upon motion by Beseke; seconded by Aljets, the agenda was approved as amended. All members
voted in favor.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Bonnett made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 11, 2006 regular meeting of the Eagan
Airport Relations Commission; Prentice seconded the motion. All members voted in favor.
VISITORS TO BE HEARD
There were no visitors to be heard.
COMMUNICATIONS UPDATE
Ziemer introduced the item stating it is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to discuss
any communication initiatives relative to airport noise each month. He stated the September/October
edition of Experience Eagan will feature an article pertaining to the Phase II Noise Study noting a draft of
the article has been prepared and is available if any member of the Commission would like to preview the
article. He also noted that Phase II of the noise study will be accessible on the City's website.
MAC MONTHLY REPORTS — EAGAN/MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR
ANALYSIS/TECHNICAL ADVISORY REPORT/17-35 DEPARTURE ANALYSIS REPORT
Ziemer introduced the item stating the enclosed June 2006 Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor
Analysis, June 2006 Technical Advisory Report and the June 2006 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report
are the most current reports available on the MAC website.
Thorkildson noted 94.5 percent compliance within the corridor during the month of June 2006. The
Commission discussed the total number of operations to date for 2006, comparing these numbers to 2005,
noting operations are down by 5,000 each month while nighttime operations have increased. The number of
complaints for the month was also noted.
PHASE II NOISE STUDY RESULTS
Ziemer introduced the item stating noise was monitored at ten study areas over a seven-day period
each. He further stated these were the same locations as in Phase I; five sites were monitored on June 12-
19, with the second five sites being monitored on June 20-27. Ziemer discussed external factors which
4
Airport Relations Commission Minutes
August 8, 2006/2
could slightly distort the results of the study such as the location of a monitor site, elevation, foliage on
trees, surrounding noises; i.e. thunderstorm, construction or barking dog. The Commission discussed data
within the results of the study making comparisons between Phase I and Phase H. They further discussed
the levels at each location site; specifically at site locations #4 and #7 and noted these locations did not
appear at the DNL levels on the contour map. The Commission stated concern over location #4
approaching a DNL level of 65.
Thorkildson commented that Phase I study was more detailed and received more information. He
stated he would like to have a representative from Orfield Labs speak to the Commission comparing Phase
I to Phase II.
PROPERTY VALUE STUDY — HUMPHREY INSTITUTE
Ziemer stated, per the direction of the ARC, Martha Krohn from the Humphrey Institute was
contacted regarding a proposed study on the impact of airport noise on property values and identifying a
student or group of students who may be interested in conducting a study as a professional research project.
He stated Ms. Krohn will forward this information to an associate dean, but we probably will not hear back
until after school resumes.
UPDATE 190 DEGREE HEADING — JULY 19 NOC MEETING
Ziemer introduced the item noting the letter of June 2, 2006 from the FAA to NOC stating the
necessity of the 190 -degree heading because of weather and safety and that traffic cannot be directed
further west to the 230 -degree heading because of inadequate separation with arriving aircraft on Runways
12R and 12L. Ziemer further stated the FAA does not view the use of the 190 -degree heading as a change
in procedure. Ziemer noted the Noise Oversight Committee continues to ask the FAA for additional
information.
Thorkildson noted the new runway has been operational for 9 — 10 months and they are still not
using the flight tracks to capacity. He stated because of this, they need to re -open the Part 150 Program.
Ziemer stated this issue would be brought before the Noise Oversight Committee and will update the
Commission.
APRIL DEPARTURE OPERATIONS
Ziemer noted that Commissioner Thorkildson had requested information regarding a noise event on
April 20, 2006 which appeared in the April 2006 Technical Advisors Report. Thorkildson stated this event
tripped five RMT's within approximately a minute. Ziemer stated he contacted Carl Rydeen, MSP Control
Tower Manager, for additional flight information and will update the Commission with his response.
NEXT MEETING: THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 14
Ziemer stated the next ARC meeting will be held on Thursday, September 14, due to the Primary
Election on September 12, 2006.
Is
Airport Relations Commission Minutes
August 8, 2006/3
MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIRPORT NOISE DVD
Ziemer stated, per the request of Commissioner Countryman, the DVD produced by the City of
Mendota Heights regarding airport noise will be available for viewing next month.
DECISION BY JUDGE RE: HOMEOWNERS LAWSUIT AGAINST MAC
Ziemer introduced the item noting an article appeared on the Star Tribune Web site today entitled
"Noise suit against MAC gets judge's OK as class action". The Commission discussed the Order noting
the motion for Class Certification was granted.
ADJOURNMENT
Upon motion by Beseke, seconded by Bonnett, the meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. All members
voted in favor. The Commission directly went into a workshop to discuss proposed legislation re: MAC
representation.
DATE
SECRETARY
MINUTES OF THE EAGAN
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING
SEPTEMBER 14, 2006
A regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission was held on Thursday, September
14, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Those present were Curtis Aljets, Steve Beseke, and Charles Thorkildson. Absent
were Jason Bonnett, Justin Countryman, Dean Haehnel, Tammy Mencel, Jack Prentice and Bret Walsh.
Also present was Jason Ziemer, Administrative Intern.
I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION
It was suggested to move New Business item B. to the end of the agenda. There was no quorum to
approve the agenda.
H. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the August 8, 2006 regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission
were not approved for lack of quorum.
III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD
There were no visitors to be heard.
IV. OLD BUSINESS
A. COMMUNICATIONS UPDATE
Ziemer introduced the item stating it is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to discuss
any communication initiatives relative to airport noise each month. Ziemer noted an article regarding
Phase II of the Noise Study, which was featured in the September/October City newsletter, and two articles
which appeared in the Eagan Sun Current newspaper regarding airport noise and the lawsuit between the
MAC and the cities of Minneapolis and Richfield.
B. MAC MONTHLY REPORTS — EAGAN/MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR
ANALYSIS/TECHNICAL ADVISORY REPORT/17-35 DEPARTURE ANALYSIS REPORT
Ziemer introduced the item stating the enclosed July 2006 Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor
Analysis, July 2006 Technical Advisory Report and the July 2006 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report
are the most current reports available on the MAC website.
Thorkildson stated there was 96 percent corridor compliance for the month of July. The
Commission noted complaints were down from the month of June. Ziemer stated Labor Day weekend
generated a large number of complaints.
Airport Relations Commission Minutes
September 14, 2006/2
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. HOME SALES & HOME SALE PRICES
Ziemer introduced the item stating Christine Berger with the Southern Twin Cities Association of
Realtors has compiled information regarding home sales and home sale prices pre -runway, November 1 —
May 24, 2005, and post -runway, November 1 — May 24, 2006. He noted the survey examined home sales
in residential neighborhoods in the vicinity of remote monitoring towers. He further noted there were
fewer sales, the average sale price was up despite a dip in the median sales price, and homes spent more
days on the market. Ziemer stated the numbers in the study were comparable to city-wide home sales
during the same period, but noted the study did not contain information as to why these homes were for
sale.
Thorkildson suggested getting information for a comparison to home sales in Mendota Heights.
The Commission noted the housing market being down and the results were not surprising. Ziemer and
Ms. Berger discussed conducting a survey in the spring as to why people are selling their homes.
B. PROPOSED MAC REPRESENTATION LEGISLATION
Ziemer introduced the item stating the ARC decided at their August 8, 2006 meeting to proceed
with drafting legislation establishing permanent representation on the MAC. Ziemer noted on August 16,
2006 the Noise Oversight Committee met and discussed the proposed legislation, requesting additional
time to review and discuss the language and membership structure with their city councils. Zeimer stated
the committee will reconvene on October 18, 2006 and draft legislation for approval by each city.
The Commission discussed the proposed legislation approved by the Eagan ARC on August 8,
2006. They discussed the type of legislation, who should be involved, out -state representation and
Governor or city appointments. The Commission suggested including only communities who fall within
the contours and suggested using legislation drafted at the August 8, 2006 meeting.
VI. STAFF/COMMISSION UPDATE
A. PHASE II NOSIE STUDY — ANALYSIS
Ziemer gave a brief background on Phase I and Phase II of the Noise Study. He stated the City
Council approved having Orfield Labs compare and analyze data from the two Noise Studies and further
stated that Steven Orfield will present the findings at a joint Airport Relations Commission meeting with
the City Council on October 10, 2006 at 5:30 p.m. in the Eagan Room of City Hall. Ziemer noted the
regular Commission meeting will follow at 7:00 p.m..in the City Council Chambers.
The Commission briefly discussed the proposal by Orfield Laboratories. Ziemer presented a draft
proposal to Commissioners in preparation of the October 10, 2006 joint meeting.
B. MINNEAPOLIS/RICHFIELD VS. MAC CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
Ziemer introduced the item referencing Commissioner Bonnett's request for additional information
regarding the certified lawsuit between the cities of Minneapolis and Richfield and the Metropolitan
Airports Commission as to its potential impacts on residents of Eagan. Ziemer stated, per the City
Attorney, that even though Eagan is not included in this lawsuit, Eagan is involved in current litigation with
MAC and all discussions concerning litigation must only occur in closed sessions with the City Council.
C. 190 -DEGREE HEADING UPDATE
Ziemer introduced the item stating that during the August 9 Metropolitan Airports Commission
meeting, it was noted that the FAA has begun testing the 200 -degree heading and, at this point, it is the
furthest westerly departure possible. He stated that the City of Burnsville has sent correspondence to
Governor Pawlenty, state legislators, and the state's congressional delegation regarding this issue.
The Commission asked Ziemer to draft a letter on behalf of the Mayor, City Council and Eagan
Airport Relations Commission to Eagan legislators regarding the FAA's new departure heading restriction.
D. CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — AVIATION CHAPTER
Ziemer introduced the item stating the City is in the process of reviewing and updating its
Comprehensive Guide Plan. The Commission discussed changes to goals and policies of the Airports and
Aviation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Ziemer stated this item will be discussed at the October 10,
2006 meeting.
E. MAC NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
Ziemer stated the next MAC Noise Oversight Committee meeting will be held on September 27,
2006. He also stated there will be an update on the 190 -degree heading at that meeting.
F. NEXT MEETING: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 7 P.M.
(JOINT MEETING WITH CITY COUNCIL AT 5:30 P.M.; PHASE H ANALYSIS STUDY)
Ziemer stated the Commission will meet in a joint meeting with the Eagan City Council in the
Eagan Room on October 10, 2006 at 5:30 p.m. to review the Phase H Analysis Study. He noted the
Commission will meet at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, following the joint meeting, to hold their
regular scheduled ARC meeting.
G. MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIRPORT NOISE DVD
Ziemer stated, per the request of Commissioner Countryman, the DVD produced by the City of
Mendota Heights will be shown following tonight's Commission meeting.
VII. ROUNDTABLE
The Commission discussed items for up -coming agendas. Suggestions included: Comprehensive
Guide Plan Aviation update, comparison of home sales in Mendota Heights, questions to conduct survey on
reasons for home sales, invite Christine Berger of the Southern Twin Cities Association of Realtors. to an
ARC meeting and 190 -degree heading.
VHI. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:50. The DVD from the City of Mendota Heights on aircraft noise was
viewed by the Commission following the meeting.
DATE
SECRETARY
August 2006
Eagan/Nlendota Heights Departure
Corridor Analysis
7-1
aOWJ
_ e
YY •���/. y � -%, f1Mv
N
/o
Metropolitan Airports Commission
6536 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in August 2006
6179 (94.5%) of those Operations Remained.in the Corridor
6536 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure 6179 (94.5%) Total 12L & 12R Carrier
Operations Departure Operations in the Corridor
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for Gate In Corridor
08/01/2006 00:00:00 - 09/01/2006 00:00:00
6179 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 2984 (48.3%), Right = 3195 (51.7%)
vvvv
U. 5000 ... .... ... .:. ...
c p
4000 ... .. .........O�p ......:...off ...... ��
UJ 3000 .......
0
o. 2000 L ... ........
Q
> 10001.. .............:.: _ ....�-. ... ..
o
M
Q 0.
-2 -1 0 1
Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles)
-i- Arrival 0 Departure Overflight
I :-
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis
I/
21
Page 1
Metropolitan Airports Commission
110 (1.7%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
North of the 090° Corridor Boundary During August 2006
Page 2
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for Gate North -Corridor
08/01/2006 00:00:00 - 09/01/2006 00:00:00
110 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1 (0.9%), Right = 109 (99.1%)
-2
(Runway End)
-1 0 1 2
Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (Corridor End)
+ Arrival Departure ❑ Overflights
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis
�a
Metropolitan Airports Commission
247 (3.8%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
South of the Corridor (South of 30L Localizer) During August 2006
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South Corridor
08/01/2006 06:04:56 - 08/31/2006 22:41:12
247 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 162 (65.6%), Right = 85 (34.4%);
m
6000 -
c5000 ...... .. ... ' ..... : ..................
0
%40001 ....... :..................
UJ 3000 j.......C1.........:...0 :........ .
o 0,0 b
Q- 2000 . P... ..................... .................
Q p
1000. ........ �. �.... U. ......
0
0 00 i
Q0 _... --
-2 —1 0 1 2
(Corridor End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY Mid -Point)
+ Arrival 0 Departure ❑ Overflight:
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Page 3
13
Metropolitan Airports Commission
39 (0.6%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 5°
South of the Corridor (50 South of 30L Localizer) During August 2006
Page 4
n
J
2 mile N
i ---I m
a
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South Corridor_5deg
08/01/2006 00:00:00 - 09/01/2006 00:00:00
39 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 26 (66.7%), Right = 13 (33.3%)
w 6000
d
d •
c
5000 ..... .........
0
R 4000 . . . .
°f O
Lu 3000 .......... .............
O O O:
0O.O
°- 2000 .0.
O
1000. ..........
0
M
Q n
0 .. V .O .......:
O
-2 -1 0 1 2
(Corridor End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY Mid-Poin
+ Arrival O Departure ❑ Overflight?
xx v w• K
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Top 15 Runway 12L and 12R Departure Destinations for August 2006
Airport
city
Heading
(deg-)
#OPS
Percent of
Total Ops.
ORD
Chicago - 0' I-lare
1240
336
5.1%
DTW
Detroit
105"
254
3.9/,'o
SEA
Seattle
2780
167
2.6%
MKE
Milwaukee
11411
147
2.2%
EWR
Newark
1060
137
2.1%
LAX
Los Angeles
2380
119
1.8%
CLE
Cleveland
1090
106
1. 6/"o
DEN
Denver
237°
104
1.6%
FAR
Fargo
3120
93
1.4%
YYZ
Toronto
951,
93
1.4%
LGA
New York - La Gaurdja
105"
92
1.4%
ATL
Atlanta
149"
91
1,4%
DCA
Washington DC - National
117"
91
1 A%
BIS
Bismarck
291"
93
I.%
.3,
-PHL
Philadelphia
1110
83
1.3%
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Page 5
45-
August 2006
Technical A►.dvisor's Report
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport
1(0
Table of Contents for August 2006
Complaint Summary - - -
Noise Complaint Map -
FAA Available Time for Runway Usage
MSP All.Operations Runway Usage
MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage
MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition
MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage
MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage -
MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's by Type --
MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's Stage Mix - - -
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map
Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events -
Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events
Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events - -- -
Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events
MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT
Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events DNL -
A Product of the Metropolitan
Airports Commission ANOMS Program
!!
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11-14
15
16
17
18
19
20-32
33-35
MSP Complaints by City
August 2006
City
Arrival
Departure
®
Other
Number of
Complaints
Number of
Complainants
% of Total
Complaints
APPLE VALLEY
69
1127
30 119
12
19
1376
53
23%
BLOOMINGTON
35
0
212
83
2
12
344
36
5.7%
BURNSVILLE
12
29
221
801
10
53
1126
78
18.8%
DEEPHAVEN
1
0,
0
0
0
0
1
1
0%
EAGAN
10
255
97
498
5
1.99
1064
174
17.8%
EDEN PRAIRIE
5
0
93
0
0
0
98
2
1.6%
EDINA
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
0%
FARMINGTON
1
79
0
1
0
1
82
3
1.4%
HOPKINS
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0%
INVER GROVE
HEIGHTS
1
0
4
0
0
0
5
4
0.1%
LAKEVILLE
0
11
0
0
0
0
11
4
0.2%
MENDOTA
HEIGHTS
0
1
27
515
0
0
543
12
9.1%
MINNEAPOLIS
78
119
149
148
2
172
668
130
11.2%
MINNETONKA
4
6
1
0
0
2
13
3
0.2%
NEW BRIGHTON
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0%
PLYMOUTH
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
2
0.1%
RICHFIELD
1
0
448
0
11
0
460
13
7.7%
ROSEMOUNT
11
1
9
1
1
1
24
6
0.4%
SAINT LOUIS PARK
15
83
0
0
0
0
98
12
1.6%
SAINT PAUL
0
0
5
1
1
14
21
7
0.4%
SAVAGE
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0%
SOUTH SAINT
PAUL
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
1
0.1%
SUNFISH LAKE
0
0
1
30
0
0
31
2
0.5%
WEST SAINT PAUL
0
0
8
0
0
0
8
3
0.1%
Total
1961
3507
517
5985
551
Nature of MSP Complaints
Airport
Complaint
Total
5985
Early/Late
350
1484
Engine Run-up
7
28
Excessive Noise
1554
4281
Frequency
494
2824
Ground Noise
340
234
Helicopter.
2
2.
Low Flying
184
2771
Structural Disturbance
14
801
Other
68
145
Total
1.5583
Note: Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints filed via the Internet.
Sum of % Total of Complaints may not equal I DO% due to rounding.
-As of May 2005, the MSP Complaints by City report includes multiple
complaint descriptors per individual complaint. Therefore, the number of
complaint descriptors may be more than the number of reported complaints.
Time of Day
Airport
Time
Total
5985
0000-0559
85
252
0600-0659
57
128
0700-1159
360
1348
1200-1559
196
644
1600-1959
395
1170
2000-2159
236
486
2200-2259
205
289
2300-2359
63
71
Total
5985
Complaints by Airport
Airport
Total
MSP
5985
Airlake
2
Anoka
11
Crystal
0
Flying Cloud
2
Lake Elmo
0
St. Paul
10
Misc.
0
Total
6010
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 19, - 1 -
MSP International Airport
Aviation Noise Complaints for August 2006
iran
ends N
M
e
aple, BrooBrooklynPaFk��
. . . . . . . . . . nic le
U i
Medina N t I
PI
YMPtAth
m� u4ELi
:iolden Ailey F I
Sahil L4jis Paik
A` 0 'nHo S
A
North Oaks
MR,
j di—
L I
jj,
Voodbw
UI
It
j A
sk-a..
S
S4akopee
Vale
IP
Lakavile
Far
•L
F --- J—
Number of Complaints per Address
1-5 6-17 18-36, 37-60 61-97 -98-139 140-287 28,8-445
-2- Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Available Hours for Runway Use
August 2006
(Source: FAA Runway Use Logs)
All Hours
'nn6apolis ; : r 0
0
77
82 '22
:.� I •x'32 �, �
110
M5P/
I MSPnIN�.
Rlehfield '
eta Helgk
I MSPS t
f1`-Ptr
1J j
Boo / Faga i'
��Nighttime Hours
�• a, I�:3j]R1 to6:00:m
11 ..ti
nneapo3ls "' '
s aint Pau
52
MSP j u-
f MSF'_i:ar
! MSP $ I WW"^ t 3
O X'r
0.
�"IN LL LLAT F
r r fff
laami �' Eaga��n
1
77
FAA Averane Dailv Count
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 Qa - 3 -
August.2005
August 2006
Air Carrier
1008
841
Commuter
456
398
General Aviation
97
101
Military
7
6
Total
1567
1345
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 Qa - 3 -
All Operations
Runway Use Report August 2006
7-1
7
.MSP
fi
Eagan
RWY-
Arrival/
Departure
-
Overflight Area
Count
Operations
Percent l'
Last Year
Count;.
Operations
Last Year
Percent
04
Arr
So. Richfield/Bloomington
5
0%
6
0%
12L
Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield,
5676
27.6%
5074
21.8%
12R
Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
5662
27.5%
5266
22.6%
17
Arr
So. Minneapolis
0
0%
0
0%
22
Arr
St. Paul/Highland Park
2
0%
11
0%
30L
Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
3277
15.9%
6802
29.2%
30R
Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
3694
17.9%
6157
26.4%
35
Arr
Bloomington/Eagan
2266
11%
0
0% 1
Total Arrivals
20682
23316
04
Dep
St. Paul/Highland Park
18
0.1%
19
0.1%
12L
Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
4931
24.1%
4933
21.5%
12R
Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
3012
14.7%
5191
22.6%
17
Dep
Bloom ington/Eagan
4037
19.7%
0
0%
22
Dep
So. Richfield/Bloomington
17
0.1%
192
0.8%
30L
Dep
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
4145
20.3%
6063
.26.4%
30R
Dep
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
4303
21%
6525
28.5%
35
Dep
So. Minneapolis
0
0%
0.
0%
Total Departures,
20463:
22923
Total Operations
41045
46239
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
- 4 - r Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
014
Carrier Jet Operations
Runway Use Report August 2006
� ,
111
Sly%�� f
.714
7.6 f
�- — isP f
MSP yraf�a+s�ax�tS iro
Richfield E rl}- n fk5
r "h7:
iv15P i k s:
6l°n
J 'r
St �3ioorreftrd;."'T - Eagan
I e] I `��u[iS hl�A.i;.I:V !%i1iE !jf •=mm••••—••••�•^_1:::-.
RWY
F�F_
Overflight Area
106
Percent
Last Year
Count
Operations
Last Year
Percent
frureapoGa
Arr
So. Richfield/Bloomington
� ,
111
Sly%�� f
.714
7.6 f
�- — isP f
MSP yraf�a+s�ax�tS iro
Richfield E rl}- n fk5
r "h7:
iv15P i k s:
6l°n
J 'r
St �3ioorreftrd;."'T - Eagan
I e] I `��u[iS hl�A.i;.I:V !%i1iE !jf •=mm••••—••••�•^_1:::-.
RWY
Arrival/
Departure
Overflight Area
Count
Operations
Percent
Last Year
Count
Operations
Last Year
Percent
04
Arr
So. Richfield/Bloomington
3
0%
4
0%
12L
Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
4675
27.6%
4024
21.2%
12R
Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
4684
27.6%
4348
22.9%
17
Arr
So. Minneapolis
0
0%
0
0%
22
Arr
St. Paul/Highland Park
1
0%
7
0%
30L
Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
2714
16%
5701
30%
30R
Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
3000
17.7%
4914
25.9%
35
Arr
Bloomington/Eagan
1882
11.1%
0
0%
Total Arrivals
16959
18998
04
Dep
St. Paul/Highland Park
16
0.1%
9
0%
12L
Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
3944
23.3%
3856
20.6%
12R
Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
2592
15.3%
4335
23.2%
17
Dep_
Bloomington/Eagan
3390
20%
0
0%
22
Dep
So. Richfield/Bloomington
17
0.1%
42
0.2%
30L
Dep
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
3508
20.7%
5233
28%
30R
Dep
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
3490
20.6%
5216
27.9%
35
Dep
So. Minneapolis
0
0%
0
0%
Total Departures
16957
18691'
Total Operations
33916
37689
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 Qc_� - 5 -
August 2006 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition
Type:
FAR Part 36 Take -
Off':Noise 'Level
Aircraft Description.
Stage
Count
Percent
B742
110
Boeing 747-200
3
4
0%
DC10
103
McDonnell Douglas DC10
3
460
1.4%
8744
101.6
Boeing 747-400
3
73
0.2%
DC8Q
100.5
McDonnell Douglas DC8 Modified Stage 3
3
77
0.2%
MD11
95.8
McDonnell Douglas MD11
3
16
0%
B767
95.7
Boeing 767
3
16
0%
A330
95.6
Airbus Industries A330
3
66
0.2%
B72Q
94.5
Boeing 727 Modified Stage 3
3
355
1%
A300
94
Airbus Industries A300
3
159
0.5%
A310
92.9
Airbus Industries A31 0
3
38
0.1%
MD80
91.5
McDonnell Douglas MD80
3
686
2%
B757
91.4
Boeing 757
3
3715
11%
DC9Q
91
McDonnell Douglas DC9 Modified Stage 3
3
5345
15.8%
B734
88.9
1Boeing 737-400
3
4
0%
A320
87.8
Airbus Industries A320
3
5253
15.5%
B735
87.7
Boeing 737-500
3
609
1.8%
13738
87.7
Boeing 737-800
3
1104
3.3%
B733
87.5
Boeing 737-300
3
581
1.7%
A318
87.5
Airbus Industries A318
3
62
0.2%
8737
87.5
Boeing 737-700 .
3
29
0.1%
A319
87.5
Airbus Industries A319
3
4317
12.7%
RJ85
84.9
Avro RJ85
3
805
2.4%
E145
83.7
Embraer ERJ-145
3
870
2.6%
E170
83.7
Embraer ERJ-170
3
302
0.9%
8717
83
Boeing 717-200
3
992
2.9%
CRJ
79.8
Canadair Regional Jet
3
7779
22.9%
E135
77.9
Embraer ERJ-135
1 3
199
0.6%
Totals
1
33916
Note: Sum of fleet mix % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Note: Stage III represent aircraft modified to meet all stage III criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation
(FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations.
-The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented per aircraft type during
take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level).
•EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one-tenth of tone -corrected perceived noise level
of an aircraft flyover measured in A -weighted decibels.
- 6 - C;O Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Count
Current
Percent
Last Years
Percent
Stage 11
0
0%
0%
Stage 111
5777
17%
20.2%
Stage III Manufactured
28139
83%
79.8%
Total Stage III.
33916
Note: Stage III represent aircraft modified to meet all stage III criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation
(FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations.
-The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented per aircraft type during
take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level).
•EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one-tenth of tone -corrected perceived noise level
of an aircraft flyover measured in A -weighted decibels.
- 6 - C;O Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Runway Use Report August 2006
W/
nt Raul
-
u ,
hrialdI.!'' 0a�a : i }CIS
i J 38.9°
IVIS" 311.1 °fin
I°
l 0.2°!p 2 .1'Yp
t EllIQ t� i' K"r+ Eagan
Ir
RWY
..
Arrival/
Departure
._.... ...........
Overflight Area
Count
Operations
Percent
Last Year
Count
Operations
Last Year
Percent
04
Arr
So. Richfield/Bloomington
3
0.2%
0
0%
12L
Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
304
21.1%
83
6%
12R
Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
397
27.6%
368
26.6%
17
Arr
So. Minneapolis
0
0%
0
0%
22
Arr
St. Paul/Highland Park
1
0.1%
8
0.6%
30L
Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
433
30.1%
732
53%
30R
Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
288
20%
190
13.8%
35
Arr
Bloomington/Eagan
12
0.8%
0
0%
Total Arrivals
1438
1381
04
Dep
St. Paul/Highland Park
2
0.2%
0
0%
12L
Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
328 I
38.9%
125
12.8%
12R
Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
203
24.1%
257
26,4%
17
Dep
. Bloomington/Eagan
27
3.2%
0
0%
22
Dep
So. Richfield/Bloomington
1
0.1%
2
0.2%
30L
Dep
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
124
14.7%
1 335
34.4%
30R
Dep
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
159
18.8%
254
26.1%
35
Dep
So. Minneapolis
0
0%
0
0%
Total Departures
844
973
Total Operations
2282
2354
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 Q - 7 -
Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10.30 p.m. to 60:00 a.m.
Runway Use Report August 2000
1
° f, 7 0/dint Raul
8.6% _ 1
ML>p _
y.
115
�m
Eagan f
f I
RWY
Arrival/
Departure
Overflight Area
Count
Operations
Percent
Last Year
Count
Operations
Last Year
Percent`
04
Arr
So. Richfield/Bloomington
3
0.2%
0
0%
12L
Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
282
21.7%
75
6.1%
12R
Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
372
28.6%
330
26.7%
17
Arr
So. Minneapolis
0
0%
0
0%
22
Arr
St. Paul/Highland Park
0 J
0%
6
0.5%
30L
Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights 1380
29.2%
646
52.3%
30R
Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
253
19.5%
179
14.5%
35
Arr
Bloomington/Eagan
10
0.8%
0
0%
Total. Arrivals
1300'`
1236
04
Dep
St. Paul/Highland Park
1
0.1%
0
0%
12L
Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
284
39.2%
89
11.2%
12R
Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
175
24.2%
208
26.1%
17
Dep
Bloomington/Eagan
25
3.5%
0
0%
22
Dep
So. Richfield/Bloomington
1
0.1%
0
0%
30L
Dep
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
100
13.8%
294
36.8%
30R
Dep,
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
138
19.1%
207
25.9%
35
Dep
So. Minneapolis
0
0%
0
0%
Total Departures
724
79:8
Total Operations
2024
2034
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
- 8 - CQ"5-- Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
August 2006 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Total Nighttime Jet
Operations by Hour
Hour
Count
2230
553
2300
483
2400
127
100
52
200
35
300
54
400
80
500
640
TOTAL
2024
Airline
ID
Stage
Type
Count
American
AAL
3
B738
30
American
AAL
3
MD80
12
America West
AWE
3
A320
93
Continental Exp
BTA
3
E145
54
Comair
COM
3
CRJ
51
DHL
DHL
3
B72Q
72
American Eagle
EGF
3
CRJ
57
American Eagle
EGF
3
E135
1
FedEx
FDX
3
A300
5
FedEx
FDX
3
A310
20
FedEx
FDX
3
B72Q
3
FedEx
FDX
3
DC10
47
Pinnacle
FLG
3
CRJ
166
Kitty Hawk
KHA
3
B72Q
10
Kitty Hawk
KHA
3
B733
31
Northwest
NWA
3
A319
176
Northwest
NWA
3
A320
152
Northwest
NWA
3
B757
256
Northwest
NWA
3
DC10
31
Northwest
NWA
3
DC9Q
200
Republic Airlines
RPA
3
E170
36
Sun Country
SCX
3
B738
185
Airtran
TRS
3
B717
36
United
UAL
3
B733
36
United
UAL
3
B735
23
United
UAL
3
B737
1
UPS
UPS
3
A300
15
UPS
UPS
3
B757
27
UPS
UPS
3
B767
1
UPS
UPS
3
DC8Q
39
TOTAL
1866
Note: The top 15 nighttime operators represent 92.2% of the total nighttime carrier jet operations.
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 WQ
-9-
B50
600
750.
700
650
604
G
[550
AP 560:
ry . 40b .
tptr
3 .
250
2p0
150
100..
0
,n�r[�rtc
-. ,.:.F}anuF`ac`tr.�r"etl 5`tag� 3 �a"'tage 3 iff�l�sx�gk: Z :
August 2006 Nighttime Fleet Stage Mix for Top 1.5 Airlines
10:30 p.m. to 6-..00:a. m'.
August 2006 Nighttime Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines
10:30 D.M. to 6:00 a.m.
Airline
Stage 2
Stage3
Manufactured
Stage 3
Total .
AAL
0
0
42
42
AWE
0
0
93
93
BTA
0
0
54
54
COM
0
0
51
51
DHL
0 1
72
0
72
EGF
0
0
58
58
FDX
0
3
72
75
FLG
0
0
166
166
KHA
0
10
31
41
NWA
0
200
615
815
RPA
0
0
36
36
SCX
0
0
185
185
TRS
0
0
36
36
UAL
0
0
60
1 60
UPS
0
39
43
82
Total
.0
324
1542
1866
Note: UPS DC8Q and B7270 aircraft are re -engined with manufactured stage 3 engines.
-10- R—T Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — August 2006
August 1 thru 8, 2006 — 4432 Carrier Jet Arrivals
August 1 thru 8, 2006 — 4455 Carrier Jet Departures
August 1 thru 8, 2006 — 329 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals August 1 thru 8, 2006 — 180 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 a 3 - 11 -
is diva
�✓�'. .r'` A �
�r�3Y'-�otah�l�ghis_ '�
rfiy9
�:k I fkr€cl
,sat f rte.:
"y1 rF�
Eagan
I L i r ri s -Air,
F r
4p 10 IeWIeY. r PC.5,-r c-!r,r
August 1 thru 8, 2006 — 329 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals August 1 thru 8, 2006 — 180 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 a 3 - 11 -
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — August 2006
August 9 thru 16, 2006 — 4461 Carrier Jet Arrivals
August 9 thru 16, 2006 — 4438 Carrier Jet Departures
of L_ff15 .'frk
Plif3"r_3O1f5
If'It E r7Lf)
- - ' If N E'i21.4l
O
(qn r oxi
Savocie
£ft�nsv�lk
August 9 thru 16, 2006 — 352 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals August 9 thru 16, 2006 —179 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
-12- :� 9 Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — August 2006
August 17 thru 24, 2006 — 4360 Carrier Jet Arrivals
August 17 thru 24, 2006 — 4351 Carrier Jet Departures
i � 1 � 31i1t 7L11
• � , �(.�{
41I o' ' , �,•! :till it PaEli
i ti nt*
� P 1 �f�attdate f� olg'tts
r hxlfwh lake
I
j
I.ILIrj, .
.. _ .a'.
Savapt-
ple a iey F r .c Int
August 17 thru 24, 2006 — 340 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals August 17 thru 24, 2006 — 211 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
ri Lguis h:il (: Ir r
SadL
�Ejina
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
0
-13-
�I
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — August 2006
August 25 thru 31, 2006 — 3706 Carrier Jet Arrivals
August 25 thru 31, 2006 — 3713 Carrier Jet Departures
Ca919',',��':•i+lf' - "-�;i1f71 �'"i1i.i(
1 a a�r99; Paul
t,o�i+�$I77jAi9-
:'Celdill
It 9 n ,
w,.iii wake -
r
August 25 thru 31, 2006 — 279 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals August 25 thru 31, 2006 —154 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
-14-
31
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
MSP International Airport
Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations
Fal on Hei hts
.44
�+
Saint Loui Paris
1
LFKE Q:AL!'1C!I!tA I
7, nneapo s i !Y
K I.
E 29
«, 11
3
10
12-
72
en e,Aeig
28 - I: rte s/ •fit.
MSIR
Richfield i — _ , 23
X1�
1 4
305
n
31 "7 F. F2�'JE4 �� � ...
Bloo , ington { f
3 a� fco�a_;8gan
35
ta,cx rx�� i.�kE %�
t. 33 37
d'
341 �r
rut 5
est saint Pa i4 ,
�-- tvu �Sain; a�
-� rhsville
Savage
r' Apple Uaile Rosemount.
I
4�a.M rl: tir�;i�vEnf3i � r , i : r � iRakeulile �.
Remote Monitoring Tower
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Heights
-15-
Time Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events
August 2006
RMT
ID
City . <
Address
Time >=
65dB
Time >=
80'dB
Time >=
RUB
Time >=`
10:Od. B`
1
Minneapolis
Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St.
25:22:10
00:00:15
00:00:00
00:00:00
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
25:21:03
00:09:48
00:00:00
00:00:00
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
30:02:25
01:55:12
00:00:13
00:00:00
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
26:33:45
00:40:36
00:00:00
00:00:00
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
30:09:28
07:11:22
00:09:29
00:00:00
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
28:35:18
06;00:49
00:12:16
00:00:01
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
00:40:01
00:00:20
00:00:00
00:00:00
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
00:11:44
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
00:00:52
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
00:02:12
00:00:11 1
00:00:00
00:00:00
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
00:00:25
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
00:01:14
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
00:08:01 1
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
14
Eagan
1st St. & McKee St.
18:11:07
00:00:46
00:00:00
00:00:00
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
00:24:02
00:00:10
00:00:00
00:00:00
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
16:41:53
01:06:17
00:00:00
00:00:00
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
00:02:35
00:00:05
00:00:00
00:00:00
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave.
00:30:43
00:00:12
00:00:00
00:00:00
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
00:17:08
00:00:04
00:00:00
00:00:00
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
00:04:54
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
00:16:33
00:00:01
00:00:00
00:00:00
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie. Trail
10:14:04
00:00:08
00:00:00
00:00:00
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
01:48:54
00:00:33
00:00:00
00:00:00
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
18:58:44
00:00:48
00:00:00
00:00:00
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
00:39:26
00:00:02
00:00:00
00:00:00
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
02:24:33
00:00:14
00:00:00
00:00:00
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
00:29:26
00:00:13
00:00:00
00:00:00
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
01:17:29
00:00:22
00:00:00
00:00:00
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
00:01:35
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
03:29:42
00:00:02
00:00:00
00:00:00
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
00:00:25
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
00:01:40
00:00:07
00:00:00
00:00:00
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
00:01:36
00:00:08
00:00:00
00:00:00
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
00:04:06
00:00:00_
00:00:00
00:00:00
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet Ln.
05:44:53
00:00:11
00:00:00
00:00:00
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
09:09:03
00:00:11
00:00:00
00:00:00
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
00:05:09
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
00:01:16
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
39
Eagan
3477 St. Charles PI.
00:00:50
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
To#al: Time for Arrival Noise Events
258 10.:24
17:09:07
00:21::58
OU:00:01`
-16-
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Time Above Threshold dB for Departure Related Noise Events
August 2006
RMT
ID
city
Address
Time >=
65dB
Time >=
804B
Time >=
90d6
Time >=
100d6
1
Minneapolis
Xerxes Ave. & 41st St.
03:45:10
00:02:1000:00:00
00:00:00
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
04:31:49
00:02:53
1 00:00:00
00:00:00
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
11:13:29
00:2.1:07
00:01:05
00:00:00
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
13:48:34
00:38:45
00:00:49
00:00:00
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
35:55:05
04:43:29
00:52:53
00:00:19
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
40:59:35
06:24:53
01:07:03
00:01:09
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
15:12:42
00:36:57
00:01:11
00:00:00
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
11:50:26
00:27:16
00:00:43
00:00:00
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
00:13:18
00:01:25
00:00:01
00:00:00
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
00:14:31
00:03:58
00:01:32
00:00:00
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
00:12:29
00:02:59
00:00:39
00:00:00
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
00:06:33
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
14:32:41
00:06:29
00:00:00
00:00:00
14
Eagan
1st St. & McKee St.
18:56:29
00:54:52
00:01:13
00:00:00
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
17:09:11
00:17:11
00:00:26
00:00:00
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
20:12:17
02:07:25
00:12:48
00:00:00
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
00:26:50
00:03:15
00:00:24
00:00:00
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave.
10:33:43 (
00:06:07
00:02:00
00:00:01
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
07:07:44
00:03:15
00:00:11
00:00:00
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
00:41:26
00:00:41
00:00:00
00:00:00
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
06:54:17
00:01:17
00:00:00
00:00:00
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
04:40:14
00:00:15
00:00:00
00:00:00
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
31:40:24
02:21:48
00:15:35
00:00:00
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
12:13:35
00:10:23
00:00:00
00:00:00
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
09:26:51
00:00:47
00:00:00
00:00:00
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
11:41:30
00:16:32
00:00:00
00:00:00
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
10:37:07
00:18:21
00:00:43
00:00:00
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
23:16:44
00:11:25
00:00:17
00:00:00
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
1 05:15:51
00:02:51
00:00:01
00:00:00
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
19:49:52
01:46:08
00:05:33
00:00:00
31 !
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
01:18:29
00:01:14
00:00:13
00:00:00
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
00:27:53
00:00:07 1
00:00:00
00:00:00
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
04:55:48
00:01:34
00:00:00
1 00:00:00
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
01:23:41
00:00:13
00:00:00
1 00:00:00
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet Ln.
03:04:14
00:02:22
00:00:00
00:00:00
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
01:19:04
00:00:46
00:00:00
00:00:00
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
02:28:14
00:01:43
00:00:00
00:00:00
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
03:35:15
00:02:17
00:00:00
00:00:00
39
Eagan
3477 St. Charles Pl.
j 02:47:51 1
00:02:36
00:00:00
1 00:00:00
Total Time for Departure Noise Events
1 384:40:56122:27:46
02:45:20
1 00:01:29
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
3�J-
-17-
Arrival Related Noise Events
August 2006
RMT
IID
City
Address
Arrival_
Events >=
68dB
Arrival
Events >_
BOO
Arrival.
Events >=
90d..B
Arrival
Events. >=
100d13
1
Minneapolis
Xerxes Ave. & 41st St.
6230
3
0
0
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
5517
199
0
0
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
5814
1440
5
0
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
5721
637
0
0
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
6071
4517
195
0
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
5955
4976
406
1
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
122
5
0
0
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
44
0
0
0
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
4
0
0
0
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
8
3
0
0
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
2
0
0
0
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
6
0
0
0
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
33
0
0
0
14
Eagan
1 st St. & McKee St.
4285
16
0
0
15
Mendota Heights i
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
95
2
0
0
16
Eagan I
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
3391
769
0
0
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
9
1
0
0
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave.
119
4
0
0
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
47
2
0
0
20
Richfield
75th -St. & 3rd Ave.
17
0
0
0
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
75
0
0
0
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
2565
3
0
0
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
456
6
0
0
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
4405
27
0
0
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
154
1
0
0
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
575
4
0
0
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
113
2
0
0
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
282
13
0
0
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
7
0
0
0
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
955
1
0
0
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
2
0
0
0
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
7
1
0
0
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
5
1
0
0
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
21
0
0
0
35
Eagan
2.100 Garnet Ln.
1455
8
0
0
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
1976
3
0
0
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
20
0
0
•0
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
7
0
0
0
39
Eagan
3477 St. Charles PI.
3
0
0
0
Total Arrival Noise Events
56573
1'2644
606.
1
- 18 - Report Generated: 09/0802006 12:50
Departure Related Noise Events
August 2006
RMT
ID
City
Address
Departure
Events >=
65dB
Departure
Events >=
80dB
Departure
Events >=
90dB
Departure
Events >=
100dB
1
Minneapolis
Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St.
753
19
0
0
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
941
39
0
0
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
2072
153
18
0
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
2475
306
16
0
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
5597
1618
545
6
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
6554
2434
518
36
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
2526
291
15
0
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
2050
217
9
0
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
37
7
0
0
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
32
17
14
0
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
27
13
7
0
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
24
0
0
0
13
Mendota Heights
j Southeast end of Mohican Court
2783
99
0
0
14
Eagan
1 st St. & McKee St.
3175
451
13
0
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
3134
171
6
0
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
3121
679
145
0
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
70
15
5
0
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave.
1978
69
17
0
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
1373
28
2
0
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
127
6
0
0
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
1451
19
0
0
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
845
8
0
0
23
Mendota Heights
f End of Kenndon Ave.
4999
837
217
0
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
2086
136
0
0
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
1240
11
0
0
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
2160
160
0
0
27
Minneapolis_
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
1971
177
9
0
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
3846
216
1
0
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
999
36
1
0
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
3186
633
86
0
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
314
8
3
0
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
91
1
0
0
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
969
21
0
0
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
306
4
0
0
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet Ln.
612
26
0
0
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
249
4
0
0
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
464
27
0
0
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
693
35
0
0
39
Eagan
3477 St. Charles PI.
539
29
0
0
Total Departure Noise Events
65869
9020
1647
42
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 3n -19-
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#1)
Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St.
DatelTime:
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB).
08/25/200619:27
NWA46
DC10
D
30L
86.7
08/14/200615:39
NWA19
B744
D
30L
86.6
08/07/200619:10
NWA44
DC10
D
30L
86.1
08/25/2006 8:02
CC1706
B72Q
D
30L
85.6
08/22/2006 8:06
CC1706
B72Q
D
30L
85.6
08/291200619:02
NWA44
DC10
D
30L
85.4
08/021200613:48
NWA99
DC10
D
30L
84.8
08/021200619:07
NWA44
DC10
D
30L
83.4
08/28/200619:04
NWA44
DC10
D
30L
83
08/20/2006 6:38
KFS69
LJ25
D
30L
82.4
(RMT Site#2)
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
Date/Time _
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrivall
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB.)
08/261200616:32
NWA3
B744
D
30L
89.2
08/19/200619:22
NWA44
DC10
D
30L
88.3
08/13/200616:14
NWA689
DC9Q
A
12L
85.6
08/24/2006 21:17
NWA1595
DC9Q
A
12L
85.6
08/30/200614:33
NWA1215
A320
A
12L
85.5
08/31/2006 5:27
NWA98
DC10
A
12L
85.3
08/03/200619:20
NWA46
DC10
D
30L
84.9
08/29/200619:07
NWA46
DC10
D
30L
84.9
08/24/2006 22:21
NWA1839
DC9Q
A
12L
84.8
08/23/2006 5:13
UPS558
DC8Q
A
12L
84.8
(RMT Site#3)
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type:
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/28/2006 20:53
DHL197
B72Q
D
30L
94.2
08/14/200615:39
NWA19
B744
D
30L
94.1
08/11/2006 22:39
CCP1465
B72Q
A
12R
93.8
08/25/2006 8:01
CC1706
B72Q
D
30L
93.7
08/22/2006 8:05
CC1706
B72Q
30L
92.4
08/21/2006 20:53
DHL197
B72Q
30L
92.3
08/02/200615:49
NWA1838
DC9Q
PjD
30L
91.9
08/20/2006 6:38
KFS69
LJ25
30L
91.8
08/08/2006 6:14
08/25/2006 20:49
NWA909
DHL197
B742
B72Q
A
D
12R
30L
91.7
91.5
-20- -% Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#4)
Park Ave. & 48th St.
DatelTime
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/01/2006 23:23
DHL304
B72Q
D
30L
94.6
08/29/2006 5:59
DHL1648
B72Q
D
30L
92.5
08/19/200614:30
NWA766
DC9Q
D
30L
92.4
08/03/2006 7:25
NWA744
DC9Q
D
30L
92.4
08/1912006 19:17
NWA46
DC10
D
30L
92.1
08/03/200610:23
NWA748
DC9Q
D
30L
91.4
08/28/200614:34
NWA766
DC9Q
D
30L
91.3
08/27/200613:32
NWA1050
DC9Q
D
30R
90.9
08/28/2006 7:18
NWA742
DC9Q
D
30L
90.9
08/02/2006 23:22
Unknown
Uknown
D
30L
90.6
(RMT Site#5)
12th Ave. & 58th St.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/02/2006 8:33
CCP1430
B72Q
D
30L
103.4
08/28/2006 8:32
CCP1464
B72Q
D
30L
101.7
08/25/2006 8:54
CCP1464
B72Q
D
30L
101.7
08/07/2006 7:38
CCP1464
B72Q
D
30L
101.2
08/04/2006 7:37
CCP1464
B72Q
D
30L
100.7
08/14/2006 8:26
CCP1464
B72Q
D
30L
100.6
08/21/2006 8:46
CCP1464
B72Q
D
30L
100
08/03/2006 9:17
CCP1460
B72Q
D
30L
99.9
08102/200610:29
NWA454
DC9Q
D
30L
99.7
08/08/2006 6:15
NWA909
B742
A
12R
99.6
(RMT Site#6)
25th Ave. & 57th St.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/02/2006 7:31
FDX1156
B72Q
D
30R
105.7
08/29/2006 23:23
CC1705
B72Q
D
30R
103.2
08/25/2006 21:58
NWA1536
DC9Q
D
30R
103
08/21/2006 9:18
NWA734
DC9Q
D
30R
102.9
08/29/2006 23:04
DHL304
B72Q
D
30R
102.7
08/02/200610:16
NWA748
DC9Q
D
30R
102.2
08/28/200613:38
NWA1050
DC9Q
D
30R
102.1
08/22/200614:36
NWA405
DC9Q
D
30R
101.3
08127/200613:11
NWA1068
DC9Q
D
30R
101.2
08/07/200613:34
NWA1050
DC9Q
D
30R
101.1
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 39 -21-
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#7)
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
Date/Time
Fright Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
L.max(dB)
08/19/2006 9:00
CCP1430
B72Q
D
30L
95.7
08/02/2006 7:11
NWA448
DC9Q
D
30L
95
08/06/2006 8:33
CCP660
B72Q
D
30L
92.8
08/02/200617:36
Unknown
B72Q
D
30L
92.7
08/02/2006 22:20
DHL197
B72Q
D
30L
92.4
08/14/2006 7:23
NWA448
DC9Q
D
30L
92.3
08/29/200610:21
NWA134
DC9Q
D
30L
92.1
08/21/200610:42
NWA1426
DC9Q
D
30L
92.1
08/25/200616:46
NWA1531
DC9Q
D
30L
92
08/03/2006 5:50
DHL1648
B72Q
D
30L
92
(RMT Site#8)
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/14/200616:18
CCP1103
B72Q
D
30L
94.5
08/29/2006 8:01
NWA1212
DC9Q
D
30R
93.7
08/29/2006 23:05
DHL304
B72Q
D
30R
93.1
08/02/2006 6:22
DHL1648
B72Q
D
30L
93
08/28/2006 22:40
DHL304
B72Q
D
30L
92.4
08/21/200619:35
CCP2691
B72Q
D
30R
91.8
08/15/200613:40
NWA730
DC9Q
D
30R
91.1
08/02/2006 7:32
FDX1156
B72Q
D
30R
91.1
08/19/200613:40
NWA1050
DC9Q
D
30R
90.2
08/01/2006 20:36
NWA616
DC9Q
D
30R
89.6
(RMT Site#9)
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type '
Arrival/'
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/11/200615:49
NWA19
8744
D
04
89.9
08/01/2006 2:32
RCH768
MD11
D
04
89
08/06/200615:23
NWA19
B744
D
04
86.9
08/07/2006.8:45
RCH750
MD11
D
04
86.7
08/02/2006 21:24
OAE792
DC10
D
04
85
08/07/200617:12
OAE752
DC10
D
04
84.5
08/18/200615:40
NWA19
8744
D
04
82.5
08/24/200615:24
NWA19
B744
D
04
78.8
08/12/200615:56
ACA584
A319
A
22
78.4
08/10/2006 6:52
BMJ54
BE80
D
12L
76.4
-22-
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#10)
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/24/200615:23
NWA19
B744
D
04
98.8
" 08/18/200615:40
NWA19
8744
D
04
98.5
08/06/200615:22
NWA19
B744
D
04
98.4
08/11/200615:49
NWA19
B744
D
04
98.1
08/02/200615:19
NWA19
B744
D
04
96.8
08/26/200615:25
NWA19
B744
D
04
95.7
08/25/200615:19
NWA19
8744
D
04
95.4
08/07/200617:11
OAE752
DC10
D
04
95.1
08/19/200616:01
NWA3
8744
D
04
94.1
08/02/2006 21:24
OAE792
DC10
D
04
94
(RMT Site#11)
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
DatelTime
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/19/200616:02
NWA3
B744
D
04
94.1
08/27/200615:22
NWA19
B744
D
04
94
08/02/200615:19
NWA19
B744
D
04
93.7
08/26/200615:25
NWA19
8744
D
04
93.7
08/19/200615:25
NWA19
B744
D
04
92.6
08/25/200615:19
NWA19
B744
D
04
91
08/24/200615:23
NWA19
B744
D
04
90.1
08/07/200615:23
NWA19
8744
D
04
89.4
08/11/200615:49
NWA19
B744
D
04
84
08/29/2006 23:24
CC1705
B72Q
D
30R
83.8
(RMT Site#12)
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/31/2006 21:41
TCA1
Uknown
D
12L
78.9
08/10/2006 7:02
BMJ66
BE80
D
12L
78
08/09/2006 7:34
BMJ18
BE80
D
12R
76.3
08/10/2006 7:22
BMJ18
BE80
D
12L
76.1
08/31/2006 7:14
BMJ18
BE80
D
-12L
76
08/29/200618:13
Unknown
PA31
A
30L
74.7
08/09/2006 7:34
BMJ13
BE80
D
12R
74.6
08/31/2006 8:10
NWA9840
A319
D
12L
72.9
08/31/2006 7:07
BMJ72
BE80
D
12L
72.5
08/04/200617:45
FLG3774
CRJ
A
12L
72.4
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 � -23-
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#13)
Southeast end of Mohican Court
Date/Tune
08/17/2006 7:02
Flight Number
CC1706
Aircraft'Type
B72Q
Arrival/
Departure
D
Runway.
12L
Lmax(dB)'
86.5
08/16/2006 20:15
NWA44
DC10
D
12R
86.1
08/08/200615:23
NWA19
B744
D
12R
85.6
08/09/2006 9.02
AAL2240
MD80
12L
85.3
08/01/200610:49
AAL1655
MD80
tD
12L
84.8
08/20/200615:10
NWA19
B744
12R
84.7
08/11/200619:15
NWA44
DC10
12R
84.4
08/23/2006 6:28
DHL1648
B72Q
D
12R
84.2
08/18/2006 7:14
CC1706
B72Q
D
12L
84.1
08/25/2006 0:14
NWA1536
DC9Q
D
12L
83.9
(RMT Site#14)
1st St. & McKee St.
Date/Time ;:
Flight Number.:
Aircraft Type
ArrivaiiRunway
Departure
Runway
Lmax(.d6)
08/13/2006 7:49
CCP1460
B72Q
D
12R
97.3
08/06/2006 7:01
CCP1460
B72Q
D
12R
96
08/17/2006 7:49
CCP1460
B72Q
D
12R
94.5
08/11/2006 7:36
CCP1464
B72Q
D
12R
94
08117/200615:59
NWA19
8744
D
12R
93.6
08/31/200616:51
CCP2690
B72Q
D
12R
92.3
08/01/200612:14
NWA99
DC10
D
12R
92
08113/200615:24
NWA19
8744
D
12R
91.8
08104/200612:02
NWA452
DC9Q
D
12R
91.1
08/06/2006 6:50
DHL1648
B72Q
D
12R
90.6
(RMT Site#15)
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
bate/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/17/2006 7:01
CC1706
B72Q
D
12L
96.7
08/11/2006 7:26
CC1706
B72Q
D
12L
92.6
08104/200617:48
NWA604
DC9Q (
D
12L
91.7
08/18/2006 22:05
NWA607
DC9Q
D
12L
91.6
081091200615:52
NWA1838
DC9Q
D
12L
90.6
08120/200619:27
NWA795
DC9Q
D
12L
90.1
08/09/200615:47
NWA497
DC9Q
D
12L
88.5
08122/200613:12
UAL779
B757
A
30R
87.3
08105/200617:24
NWA1760
DC9Q
D
12L
87.1
08/12/200615:37
NWA1790
DC9Q
D
12L
87
-24- ff I Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#16)
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/05/2006 9:15
CCP1430
B72Q
D
12R
98.3
08/12/2006 9:09
CCP1430
B72Q
D
12R
97.8
08/09/2006 8:37
CCP1430
B72Q
D
12R
97
08/10/2006 7:54
CCP1460
B72Q
D
12R
95.4
08/16/200610:28
NWA1426
DC9Q
D
12R
95
08/11/2006 7:36
CCP1464
B72Q
D
12R
94.8
08/23/2006 7:56
CCP1430
B72Q
D
12R
94.8
08/24/2006 7:54
CCP1460
B72Q
D
12R
94.7
08/30/200614:14
CCP638
B72Q
D
12R
94.7
08/13/200615:24
NWA19
B744
D
12R
94.6
(RMT Site#17)
84th St. & 4th Ave.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
i 08/07/2006 4:44
RCH764
MD11
D
22
96.1'
08103/200615:29
NWA19
B744
D
22
92.9
08/18/2006 8:34
CCP1464
B72Q
D
22
91.8
08/21/200615:32
NWA19
8744
D
22
91
08/23/200615:19
NWA19
B744
D
22
90.4
08/15/200615:22
NWA19
B744
D
22
89.1
08/05/200615:55
NWA3
B744
D
22
88.7
08/01/200615:24
NWA19
B744
D
22
88.3
08/28/200615:21
NWA19
B744
D
22
87.4
08105/200615:33
NWA19
8744
D
22
85.8
(RMT Site#18)
75th St. & 17th Ave.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08105/200615:55
NWA3
8744
D
22
99.9
08/12/200616:46
NWA3
8744
D
22
_
99.2
08/05/200615:33
NWA19
B744
D
22
99.2
08/16/2006 8:39
CCP1430
B72Q
D
22
98.4
08/22/200615:39
NWA19
B744
D
22
97.5
08/18/2006 8:34
CCP1464
B72Q
D
22
97.3
08/15/200615:22
NWA19
8744
D
22
97.2
08/01/200615:24
NWA19
B744
D
22
96.9
08/28/200615:21
08103/200615:29
NWA19
NWA19
B744
6744
D
D
22
22
96.9
96.8
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 40-� -25-
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise .Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#19)
16th Ave. & 84th St.
-' Date/Time
08/04/200615:22
Flight Number
g
NWA19
Aircraft Type
8744
Arrival/
Departure.
D
Runway
22
Lmax(dB).
92.2
08/12/200616:46
NWA3
B744
D
22
91.4
08/16/2006 8:40
CCP1430
B72Q
D j
22
89.6
08/05/200615:33
NWA19
8744
D
22
86.6
08112/200616:10
NWA19
B744
D
22
85
08/04/200513:24
OAE820
DCI 0
D
22
84.9
08/05/200615:55
NWA3
B744
D
22
84.6
08/07/2006 4:43
RCH764
MD11
D
22
84.5
08/28/200615:21
NWA19
B744
D
22
84.4
08/03/200615:29
NWA19
8744
D
22
84.3
(RMT Site#20)
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
Date/Time
Fl g ht Number
Aircraft T
Type
. _
Arrival!
Departure
Runway
Lmax dB.'
08/01/200615:23
NWA1266
DC9Q
D
30L
88.4
08/13/2006 20:00
NWA1461
DC9Q
D
30L
83.6
08/01/200614:47
AAL1442
MD80
D
30R
82.8
08/22/200617:41
AAL422
MD80
D
30L
82.8
08/26/2006 7:29
FDX442
A300
30L
82
08/28/200615:21
NWA19
8744
[ED
22
81.8
08/28/2006 21:48
NWA1269
DC9Q
30L
79.9
08/19/2006 7:19
BMJ64
BE80
30L
79.7
08/22/200616:56
NWA563
A320
D
30L
79.4
08/15/200615:22
NWA19
B744
D
22
79.1
(RMT Site#21)
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
bate/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival!
Departure
Runway
Lmax(d6)
08/24/200614:41
NWA361
B757
D
12R
86.7
08/16/2006 6:55
CC1706 .
B72Q
D
12R
83.6
08/23/2006 6:29
DHL1648
B72Q
D
12R
83.3
08/09/2006 0:26
RCH791
MDI 1
D
12R
82.3
08/05/2006 21:41
NWA56
DC10
D
12R
82.1
08/15/2006 23:27
CC1705
B72Q
D
12L
82.1
08/08/2006 21:17
NWA764
DC9Q
D
12L
81.5
08/20/200612:18
CCP2760
B72Q
D
17
81.5
08/31/200616:56
NWA1532
DC9Q
D
12L
81.1
08/30/200619:15
NWA46
DC10
D
12R
81
-26-
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#22)
Anne Marie Trail
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/23/2006 22:09
FDX1106
B72Q
D
12R
81.9
08/28/2006 8:25
NWA679
A319
A
30R
81.3
08/08/2006 7:48
RCH766
MD11
D
12R
81.3
08/21/2006 8:25
BTA3200
E145
A
30R
81.3
08/31/200612:17
DAL553
MD80
D
12R
81.1
08/14/200611:31
NWA672
A320
A
30L
81
08/20/200610:33
NWA454
DC9Q
D
12R
80.5
08/06/2006 7:02
CCP1460
B72Q
D
12R
80.4
08/24/2006 22:00
NWA56
DC10
D
12R
80.3
08/07/2006 21:56
FDX1106
B72Q
D
12R
80.2
(RMT Site#23)
End of Kenndon Ave.
Date/Time
08/0412006 15:46
08/18/2006 22:03
FlightNumber
NWA1838
NWA1175
Aircraft Type
DC9Q
DC9Q
Arrival/
Departure -
eparture08/04/200615:46
D
D
Runway
12L
12L
Lmax(dB)
96.5
95.9
08/20/200619:31
NWA1842
DC9Q
D
12L
94.9
08/20/200617:04
NWA604
DC9Q
D
12L
94.7
08/09/200610:49
NWA1082
DC9Q
D
12L
94.6
08/09/2006 9:38
NWA1704
DC9Q
D
12L
94.5
08/09/200617:47
NWA746-
DC9Q
D
12L
94.3
08/20/2006 21:15
NWA1462
DC9Q
D
12L
94.3
08/12/200616:23
NWA1169
DC9Q
D
12L
94.3
08/31/200611:55
NWA1841
DC9Q
D
12L
94.1
(RMT Site#24)
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
Date/Time
08/13/200615:25
Flight Number
NWA19
Aircraft Type
8744
Arrival/
Departure
D
Runway
12R
Lmax(dB)
88.4
08/06/2006 7:01
CCP1460
B72Q
D
12R
87
08/13/2006 7:49
CCP1460
B72Q
D
12R
86.9
08/16/200611:55
NWA452
DC9Q
D
12R
86.3
08/30/2006 23:30
CC1705
B72Q
D
12L
86
08/06/2006 6:50
DHL1648
B72Q
D
12R
84.9
08/08/2006 21:39
NWA56
DC10
D
12R
84.9
08/15/2006 22:10
FDX1106
B72Q
D
12R
84.8
08/16/2006 21:41
NWA56
DC10
D
12R
84.6
08131/200616:51
CCP2690
B72Q
D
12R
84.6
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 111t� -27-
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#25)
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
Date/time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
.Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(c!B)
08/20/200612:17
CCP2760
B72Q
D
17
86.3
08/27/200615:26
NWA132
DC9Q
D
12R
83.5
08/10/200611:45
NWA452
DC9Q
D
12R
83.2
08/21/2006 8:03
NWA681
DC9Q
A
30L
82.7
08/20/200611:02
NWA1174
DC9Q
D
12R
82
08/05/2006 9:15
CCP1430
B72Q
D
12R
82
08/30/200614:14
CCP638
B72Q
D
12R
80.9
08/01/2006 6:05
DHL1648
B72Q
D
12R
80.7
08/12/2006 9:09
CCP1430
B72Q
D
12R
80.4
08/20/200611:13
NWA1426
DC9Q
D
12R
80.3
(RMT Site#26)
6796 Arkansas Ave. W..
Date/time
Flight. Number
:Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(:dB.)
08/16/2006 6:54
CC1706
B72Q
D
12R
88.4
08/10/2006 7:23
CC1706
B72Q
D
12R
88.3
08/09/2006 7:24
CC1706
B72Q
D
12R
88.2
08/16/2006 23:38
CC1705
B72Q
D
12R
87.5
08/15/2006 22:54
DHL304
B72Q
D
12R
86.7
08/09/200615:24
NWA19
B744
D
12R
86.5
08/23/2006 8:33
NWA1090
A319
D
12L
86.2
08/05/2006 8:17
RCH821
MD11
D
12R
86.2
08/15/200619:09
NWA44
DC10
D
12R
86.2
08/05/200611:57
NWA99
DC10
D
12R
86.1
(RMT Site#27)
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
Date/Ti ne.
Flight Number
AircraftT.Ype
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
L[nax( 13)
08/25/2006 8:54
CCP1464
B72Q
D
30L
97.5
08/07/2006 7:38
CCP1464
B72Q
D
30L
95.5
08/27/2006 7:47
CCP1460
B72Q
D
30L
93.8
08/03/2006 7:12
CCP1460
B72Q
D
30L
92.9
08/14/200615:16
NWA1494
DC9Q
D
30L
91.5
08/02/2006 8:33
CCP1430
B72Q
D
30L
90.9
08/02/200610:30
NWA454
DC9Q
D
30L
90.6
08/26/2006 9:20
CCP1430
B72Q
D
30L
90.4
08/02/200617:14
NWA746
DC9Q
D
30L
90.2
08/25/2006 7:29
NWA448
DC9Q
D
30L
88.9
-28- CIS Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#28)
6645 16th Ave. S.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
_
Lmax(dB)
1
08/14/200613:21
NWA494
DC9Q
D
30L
98.6
08/25/2006 21:48
NWA1269
DC9Q
D
30L
87.2
08/211200611:29
NWA103
A320
D
30L
86.9
08/24/2006 23:02
DHL304
B72Q
D
17
86.8
08114/200617:04
NWA1531
DC9Q
D
30L
86.7
08107/200619:53
TRS879
B717
D
30L
86.3
08/20/2006 7:01
NWA456
DC9Q
D
17
85.9
08/20/2006 7:13
NWA448
DC9Q
D
17
85.9
08/221200613.09
NWA1489
DC9Q
D
30L
85.8
08/31/200610:26
NWA134
DC9Q
D
17
85.4
(RMT Site#29)
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/28/2006 23:14
CC1705
B72Q
D
30R
90.2
08/21/200610:46
AAL1655
MD80
D
30R
85.5
08/06/200613:35
NWA1790
DC9Q
D
30R
85.1
08/28/2006 6:54
SCX245
6738
D
30L
84.7
08/281200616:51
NWA1532
DC9Q
D
30R
84.7
08/27/2006 6:56
AAL386
MD80
D
30R
84.6
08/30/2006 7:00
AAL386
MD80
D
30R
84
08/19/200613:18
NWA1093
DC9Q
D
30R
83.6
08/06/200615:01
AAL1442
MD80
D
30R
83.4
08/13/2006 22:23
NWA859
DC9Q
D
30R
83.4
(RMT Site#30)
8715 River Ridge Rd.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB,)
08/1312006 17:47
CJT630
B72Q
D
17
98
08/23/2006 20:40
DHL197
B72Q
_
D
17
96.3
08/241200616:08
NWA409 I
_
DC9Q
D
17
95.2
08/09/2006 21:00
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
94.4
08/08/2006 7:09
CC1706
B72Q
D
17
94.1
08/17/2006 21:56
FDX1106
B72Q
D
17
94
08/15/200616:57
NWA1531
DC9Q
D
17
93.9
08/27/200619:34
NWA975
DC9Q
D
17
93.9
08/24/2006 22:41
NWA1417
DC9Q
D
17
93.8
08110/200611:02
NWA1174
bC9Q
D
17
93.3
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 -29-
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#31)
9501 12th Ave. S.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrivall
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB),_
08/05/200615:34
NWA19
B744
D
22
93
08/051200615:56
NWA3
8744
D
22
92.9
08/12/200616:11
NWA19
8744
D
22
90
08/04/200613:25
OAE820
DC10
D
22
86.5
08/12/200616:47
NWA3
B744
D
22
84.5
08/04/2006 15:22
NWA19
B744
D
22
82.8
08/01/200614:47
AAL1442
MD80
D
30R
80.1
08/03/2006 7:07
BMJ64
BE80
D
17
80.1
08/04/200617:06
NWA573
A319
D
17
79
08/24/200617:38
SCX287
B738
D
17
78.2
(RMT Site#32)
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft'Type
;Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/07/2006 4:44
RCH764
MD11
D
22
84.1
08/09/2006 3:28
UPS552
8757
A
12R
83
08/26/2006 7:47
NWA138
DC9Q
D
30L
79.1
08/01/200615:18
NWA1494
DC9Q
D
30L
78.8
08/25/2006 22:13
NWA144
DC9Q
D
30L
78.1
08/22/200612:10
DAL553
MD80
D
30L
77.9
08/20/2006 7:23
NWA1428
DC9Q
D
30L
77.8
08/22/2006 7:12
DAL599
MD80
D
30L
77.6
08/21/200610:43
NWA1426
DC9Q
D
30L
77.4
08/29/2006 7:26
I FDX645
DCI 0
D
30L
76.8
(RMT Site#33)
North River Hills Park
Date/Tim, a
Flight. Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival!
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/20/2006 7:44
CCP1460
B72Q
D
17
86.4
08/14/2006 22:12
FDX1106
B72Q
D
17
83.9
08/14/2006 22:53
DHL304
B72Q
D
17
83.7
08/0712006'4:45
RCH764
MD11
D
22.
83.1
08/24/200618:35
UAL1184
B735
A
12R
82.4
08/03/2006 8:57
AAL675
MD80
D
17
82
08/23/200615:47
NWA1673
DC9Q
D
17
81.8
08/23/200611:44
AAL 1386
MD80
D
17
81.7
08/24/200616:31
AAL2092
MD80
D
17
81.6
08/16/2006 22:00
FDX1106
B72Q
D
17
81.5
-30-
L17
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#34)
Red Oak Park
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/24/2006 23:05
DHL304
B72Q
D
17
82.8
08/05/200614:28
NWA973
DC9Q
D
17
81.2
08/20/2006 7:44
CCP1460
B72Q
D
17
80.4
08/01/200616:25
AAL2092
MD80
D
17
80.3
08/13/200617:49
CJT630
B720
D
17
79.3
08/30/200611:46
AAL1386
MD80
D
17
79.3
08/10/2006 15:26
NWA409
DC9Q
D
17
79.3
08/18/200616:18
AAL2092
MD80
D
17
79.1
08/23/2006 9:33
AAL675
MD80
D
17
79
08/30/200616:27
AAL2092
MD80
D
17
78.9
(RMT Site#35)
2100 Garnet Ln.
Dateffime
Flight Number.
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
. Lmax(dB)
08/16/2006 8:41
CCP1430
B72Q
D
22
86.8
08/20/2006 6:56
DHL1648
B72Q
D
17
86.1
08/03/2006 21:02
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
85.5
08/14/2006 20:54
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
85.4
08111/200614:55
AAL1442
MD80
D
17
84.3
08/21/2006 6:39
AAL1279
MD80
D
17
84.2
08/03/2006 9:19
AAL2240
MD80
D
17
83.2
08/21/2006 7:02
NWA456
DC9Q
D
17
83.1
08/23/200614:47
AAL1442
MD80
D
17
83.1
08/08/200613:45
NWA856
DC9Q
D
17
82.8
(RMT Site#36)
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
Date/Time
08/13/200617:49
Flight Number
CJT630
Aircraft Type
B72Q
Arrival/
Departure
D
Runway
17
Lmax(dB)
84.2
08/20/2006 6:56
DHL1648
B72Q
D
17
83.8
08/28/200611:36
TRS871
8717
A
35
83.2
08/03/2006 21:03
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
82.8
08114/2006 20:54
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
82.7
08/29/2006 20:49
NWA1536
DC9Q
A
35
82.6
08/28/2006 7:44
NWA1524
DC9Q
A
35
81.8
08/02/200610:01
NWA1458
DC9Q
A
35
79.7
08/27/200612:52
MES3555
RJ85
A
35
79.6
08/26/200619:35
NWA579
A320
A
35
79.5
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 �1C -31 -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
August 2006
(RMT Site#37)
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
Date/Time :
Flight Number
Aircraft: Type.
Arrival!
Departure:.
Runway
Lmax(dB)
08/09/2006 9:55
NWA1811
A320
D
17
86.5
08/09/2006 8:30
AAL675
MD80
D
17
85.8
08/16/2006 8:41
CCP1430
B72Q
D
22
83.8
08/09/2006 8:52
KFS69
LJ25
D
17
83.1
08127/200617:33
AAL422
MD80
D
17
82.5
08/10/200613:50
NWA1672
DC9Q
D
17
82.4
08/20/200615:26
NWA132
DC9Q
D
17
82.2
08/08/200615:30
NWA138
DC9Q
D
17
82
08/01/200611:49
AAL1386
MD80
D
17
81.8
08/16/2006 8:31
AAL675
MD80
D 1
17
81.8
(RMT Site#38)
3957 Turquoise Cir.
Date7Time .
Flight Number
Aircraft Type :
Arrival?
Departure_
Runway
Lmax.(.dB).
08/04/200611:36
FDX891
B72Q
LJ25
D
D
17
17
84.6
08/09/2006 8:52 KFS69
84.5
08/16/200611:47
AAL1386
MD80
D
17
84.1
08/13/200614:42
AAL1442
MD80
D
17
84
08/13/200612:33
AAL1386
MD80
D
17
_ 83.3
08/16/200610:46
NWA1455
DC9Q
D
17
83.2
08/09/200617:39
AAL422
MD80
D
17
83.2
08/08/200619:22
NWA140
A320
D
•17
83
08/20/200611:53
AAL1386
MD80
D
17
82.8
08/23/200617:35
1 NWA458
DC9Q
D
17
82.6
(RMT Site#39)
3477 St. Charles PI.
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type.
Arrival/
Departure:
Runway
Lmax(dB).
.08/31/2006 21:02
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
89.4
08/08/2006 7:10
CC1706
B72Q
D
17
89.1
08/18/2006 20:46
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
88.3
08/12/200616:47
NWA3
B744
D
22
86.1
08/16/2006 20:57
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
85.9
08/09/2006 21:01
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
85
08/04/200615:23
NWA19
8744
D
22
84.5
08/23/200610:54
NWA1174
DC9Q
D
17
82.7
08/09/200610:28
NWA1670
DC9Q
D
17
82.6
08/09/2006 7:28
NWA1428
DC9Q
D
17
82.6
- 32 -
. August 2006 Remote Monitorin a Tower To. Ten summary
The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for August 2006 were comprised of 93.6%
departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the B72Q with 29.2% of the highest Lmax
events.
August 2006 Technical Advisor Re�_ort Notes
Unknown fields are due to unavailability of FAA flight track data. Missing FAA radar data for 0 days during the
month of August 2006.
C'S
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL
August 2006
Remote Monitoring Towers
Date
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
#14
#15
08/01/2006
61.1
60.5
66.3.67.7
74.8
74.9
57.2
62.9
58.8
59.1
47.1
NA
54.4
63.6
56.2
08/02/2006
53.1
55.5
64.2
66
74.7
75.3
66.8
64.8
44.6
56.4
53.2
34.3
36.5
60.7
29.8
08/03/2006
54.3
59.4
60.7
64.1
72.9
73.8
65.3
60.8
NA
29.5
30.5
NA
39.6
61.9
43.9
08/04/2006
57.3
60.6
64.4
62
70.3
70.1
59.7
59
33.8
37.8
28.1
35.1
58.9
64.7
60.2
08/05/2006
59.5
62.1
66.2
64
69.9
70.2
41.5
26.9
46.2
39.9
26.6
34.2
59.2
61.8
60.3
08/06/2006
55.8
57.6
61.6
61.5
71.3
72.7
61.1
57.8
45.5
55.5
42.7
NA
48.5
64.6
.47.2
08/07/2006
55.9
57.9
62.6
62.2
72.6
73.1
62.2
58.6
49.2
55.8
49.9
41.9
55.9
65.4
56.9
08/08/2006
62.5
63.4
67.4
64.7
72.5
72.4144.6
36.2
NA
" NA
NA
NA
59.5
66.4
59.9
08/09/2006
60.8
61.7
67.7
62.9
72.5
69.2
42.9
41.4
43.4
46.5
NA
38.2
59.1
66.6
60.8
08/10/2006
60.1
62
67.9
63
72.5
69.5
44.3
NA
50.2
42.6
NA
47.5
59.5
66.1
60.3
08/11/2006
60.9
62.3
69.5
63.5
73.7
69.4
43.1
36.9
49.3
55.3
44.4
32
61.2
64.4
61
08/12/2006
59.8
61.5
66.9
63.4
71.2
69.2
51.7
32.2
38
41.4
NA
26.5
59.2
63.3
61.3
08/13/2006
59
59.9
64.9
62.5
70.4
72.1
58.2
53.6
NA
NA
NA
NA
55.1
64.7
54.9
08/14/2006
52.6
53.2
60.1
61.5
71.3
72.5
63.3
61.3
37.8
38.2
35
39.5
31.4
61.5
41.9
08/15/2006
54.2
58
62.9
64.9
73.1
72.5
61.4
61.2
38.6
39.5
NA
NA
55.8
64.5
57.5
08/16/2006
57.9
60.3
65.3
62.2
69.5
68.4
50.8
55.4
27.7
NA
NA
26.3
60.3
64
61.6
08/17/2006
61.1
61.3
69.1
62.4
72.8
68.8 42.1
41.3
39.6
NA
NA
NA
59.6
64.6
60.9
08/18/2006
60.4
61.7
67.3
62.5
71.4
69
136.11
29.1
49.2
55.9
43
38.7
59.5
64.2
64.8
08/19/2006
51.7
56.7
58.5
61.7
70.4
74.5
61.5
59.8
42.6
55.8
55.4
NA
NA
60.4
34.9
08/20/2006
58.8
60.3
65.2
61.3
70.1
68.4
55.8
53
NA
32.8
26.4
34
57.8
62.3
58.6
08/21/2006
55.9
56.7
63.5
62.2
73.4
74.4
62
60.8
NA
36.3
NA
NA
45.2
59.5
45.1
08/22/2006
55.8
58.3
61.7
62.2
69.4
72.1
58.5
61.4
40.7
32.4
42.7
NA
55.7
63.8
55.9
08/23/2006
61.1
64.1
66.3
65
70.7
71.8
43.5
49.3
28.5
36.9
30.3
37
60
64.7
60.2
08/24/2006
62.5
66
69.6
67.4
73.1
73.2
48.4
38.3
39.8
56.2
48.8
NA
58.2
63.3
60.9
08/25/2006
59.2
58.6
67
65.4
74.8
75.6
62.9
59.6
42.6
53.8
51
30.6
54.1
60.8
54.7
08/26/2006
49.7
52
56.8
60.4
68.4
71.3
61.3
58.3
NA
55.3
52.1
30.3
46.1
61.5
51.8
08/27/2006
54.7
57.9
61.3
60.2
69.5
69.5
60.9
57.9
NA
51.4
52.4
NA
55.2
61.2
55.7
08/28/2006
54
56.3
61.7
62.5
73.7
75.1
64.3
64.6
NA
34.8
NA
NA
48.4
60.3
43.1
08/29/2006
55.4
55.4
63.6
64.4
73
77.2
65.5
65.3
NA
51.7
55
32.7
28.2
59.8
39.4
08/30/2006
57.5
60.6
64.1
63.2
70.4
70.8
56.4
56.2
NA
NA
NA
27.9
58.8
64.3
59.5
08/31/2006
59.9
62.5
67.4
64.3
71.8
70.2
44.2
NA
46.8
43.6
41
46.9
58.8
66
62.3
Mo.DNL
58.6
60.5
65.6
63.7.
72.1
72.5
60.2
58.9
46.8
51:6
47.3
37.3
57
63.7
58.6
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 -33-
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL
August 2006
Remote Monitoring Towers
Date
#16:
#17
#18
#19
#20
#21
#22
#23
#24
#25
#26
#27
#28
#29'
08/01/2006
69.1
48.9
55.3
49.9
50.6
51.1
58.1
63.1
61.3
54.3
56.5
53.2
60.1
56
08/02/2006
67.1
29.2
45.6
NA
36.9
40.3
58.9
46.9
61
43.4
48.9
63.6
60.7
68.3
08/03/2006
68.2
51.3
54.8
46.4
40.4
40.9
58.7
49.8
61.8
38.4
52.6
60.6
59.5
55.9
08/04/2006
69
42.8
56
53.4
28.3
54.1
59.5
67.9
62.9
53.7
57.1
54.8
54.5
53.3
08/05/2006
64.6
52
60
51.1
45.6
55.1
54.1
68.2
58.5
53.2
59
30.7
52.2
NA
08/06/2006
65.4
30.7
40.4
26.4
39.8
39.5
54.6
59.2
60.9
47.4
56.9
56.9
57
52.8
08/07/2006
66.9
63.3
63.2
54.3"49.7
52.8
57.3
66.2
62.2
53.7
58.2
60.5
57.9
51.9
08/08/2006
69
NA
55.2
51.5
25.8
54.9
57.4
68.6
63.4
56.2
62.3
38.8
55.8
30.7
08/09/2006
69.4
NA
54.8
51.2
48.6
57.2
56.8
68
62.6
56.4
63
46.4
55.8
35.7
08/10/2006
70.1
48.8
54.9
52.8
NA
56.8
55.9
68.4
61.8
59
61.6
43.8
58.2
37.5
08/11/2006
66.2
36
1 54.4
52.1
31.3
57.1
55.7
68
60.4
52.8
68.7
41.5
57
30.9
08/12/2006
65.8
45.2
69.4
54.9
41.1
53.9
55
67.8
60.2
54.7
58.7
34.3
52.7
NA
08/13/2006
67.6
40
51.9
50.7
43.8
51.4
56.8
64.1
61
50.5
58.9
52.9
57.3
56.6
08/14/2006
66.8
29.8
54.1
53.6
46.4
40.3
57.5
50.5
60.6
45
52
59.2
61.8
56.9
08/15/2006
67.5
48.4
55
46.6
44.4
55.5
58.3
66.2
62.6
50.3
60.6
58.9
57.6
54.2
08/16/2006
65.6
42.9
58.4
54
35.5
58.1
56.7
68.5
61.1
53.8
63.1
41.6
56.3
29.2
08/17/2006
66.6
41.9
55.8
53.6
NA
55.9
54.9
68.6
60.1
52.6
61.5
36.2
56.9
NA
08/18/2006
67.6
51.1
57.1
52.8
44.4
54.9
54.9
70.8
60.9
53.3
60.4
33.9
55.3
NA
08/19/2006
66.3
38.7
48.5
41.8
45
41.4
56.3
42.1
59.8
46.2
48.6
57.9
57.5
53.6
08/20/2006
66.2
NA
55.3
52.1
34.1
56.7
56.8
68.2
59.7
51.4
58.3
50.8
58.1
41.1
08/21/2006
63
50.9
54.3
50.2
46.2
41.1
55.2
58.6
58.9
46
56.3
61.2
59
54.5'
08/22/2006
67.7
46.9
57.3
51.4
47.1
54.5
59.4
66
62.1
54.1
60
54
59.6
56.4
08/23/2006
67 55.8
59
54.5
38
57
58.6
67.8
61.5
55.2
61
44.7
58.9
46.4
08/24/2006
69.1 35.2
60.2
57.2
35.5
52.4
54.3
65.7
59.9
58.2
57.9
47.6
64.1
33.4
08/25/2006
65.1 40
43.6
34.8
41.5
47
55.3
61.9
59.5
48.5
54.9
60.2
60.9
_51
08/26/2006
66.3
43.1
50.21
48
43.5
47.2
57.7
57
60.5
50.2
52.3
57
56.5
50.3
08/27/2006
65.8
33.6
51.1
49.5
37.5
53.4
54
65.7
58.9
52.8
57.1
56.9
55.8
55.7
08/28/2006
65.2
48.6
55.3
45.6
46.5
41.4
55.1
53
59.1
48.2
48.9
61.9
60.3
62.2
08/29/2006
65.5
44.7
48.8
43.9
46.4
46
56'.5149.1
59.7
44.4
53
59.9
60.4
58.8
08/30/2006
65.9
43.6
59.1
57.2
48.4
55.7
59
67.4
62.5
51.7
60.8
58
61.1
48.5
08/31/2006
68
49.1
57
1 54.9
37.5
53.4
56.6
68.9
62.7
57.4
62.9
45.1
59.9
29.8
Mo.DNL
67.2
50.8
58.4
52.1
44.3
53.7
'56.0:16M
1
.61..1
53.3
60.1
56.9
58.8
56:4
-34- ,h / Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL
August 2006
Remote Monitoring Towers
Date
#30
#31
#32
#33
#34
#35
#36
#37
#38
#39
08/01/2006
60.6
46.1
43.3
48
43.5
49.7
49.4
46.8
46.3
48.6
08/02/2006
49.4
NA
NA
NA
32.2
52.1
55.7
NA
NA
26.5
08/03/2006
55.4
41.8
40.2
47.1
38.5
54.2
55.7
31
25
NA
08/04/2006
60.3
47.5
24.6
50
42.7
47.5
45.3
50.7
51.3
49
08/05/2006
58.4
54.9
33.1
46.6
40.3
49.4
48.5
41.8
48.3
48.5
08/06/2006
47.6
30.2
26.3
NA
NA
50.9
53.8
NA
43
NA
08/07/2006
51.4
43.4
53.9
52.6
44.2
53.8
56.4
50.6
NA.
NA
08/08/2006
63.1
43.5
33.8
49.3
40.1
49.5
41.8
48.6
49.4
53.5
08/09/2006
63.8
42.9
52.1
52.1
43.4
48.6
41.5
52.2
53
50.8
08/10/2006
63.8
42.3
31.5
50.1
48.7
48.4
44.6
50.6
51.8
43.4
08/11/2006
63.5
44.8
29.7
49.8
44.6
50.4
44.9
49.7
50.8
48.6
08/12/2006
60.2
50.3
31.8
47.3
43.5
47.7
39.4
46.6
47.3
48.8
08/13/2006
63.4
43.3
41
48
46.2
50.6
50.2
48.7
50.9
42.7
08/14/2006
65.9
40.9
39.2
59.4
49.9
56.6
56.8
NA
NA
37.6
08/15/2006
56.3
28.5
49.2
45.9
38.8
49
53.4
41.6
45.3
44.4
08/16/2006
64.7
39.9
27.5
55
45.1
54.1
49.4
51.6
52.3
51.9
08/17/2006
63.5
48.8
40.2
51.5
46.3
46.6
40.5
51.3
51.7
49.6
08/18/2006163.3
41
36.2
50.5
45.9
49
41.9
48.6
50.2
51.9
08/19/2006
56.3
NA
38.6
44
41.5
49.9
54.1
47.4
26.7
33.8
08/20/2006
64
38.6
42.8
52.4
47.4
57.2
55.4
49.8-
49.5
48.3
08121/2006
61.8
43.7
51.7
46.8
38.9
56.8
55.4
44.8
43.4
NA
08/22/2006
63.1
45.6
44.6
45.8
43.1
52.5
53.4
41
45.1
42.4
08/23/2006
65.1
43.7
33.6
53.7
47.4
48.1
42.1
47.8
49.9
53.8
08/24/2006
68.4
50.5
42.2
53.4
52.6
48
45
43.6
44.6
49
08/25/2006
54.1
45.5
50.2
46.4
44.6
53.7
54.9
48.3
52
39.6
08/26/2006
58.8
36.6
43.9
41.4
44.8
51.7
55.3
NA
NA
NA
08/27/2006
60.7
38.1
NA
45.7
38.5
49.350.9
46.2
50.4
43.7
08/28/2006
50.4
37.4
43.5
44.2
34.5
53
55.9
37
39.6
NA
08/29/2006
54.5
38.4
43.2
35.4
45.1
50.5
54.4.
45.1
29.5
NA
08/30/2006
66.3
51.4
46.2
51.9
48.9
53.9
49.9
51.8
52.3
49.3
08/31/2006
65
45.6
36.8
51.9
44.7
47.8
45.4
50.1
51.8
52.1
Mo.DNL
62.4
45.9
45.1
50.7
45.3
52
52.4
47.9
48.8
47.8'
Report Generated: 09/08/2006 12:50 S<-� -35-
8/1/2006 - 8/31/2006
Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport
NIS P
L
t
*This report is for inZrmaona'Purposesonl�and
t
canhot be used renforcement purpose.
5z
L_
w
3390 Carrier Jets DeQarted Runwav 17 - 8/1/2006 - 8/31/2006
*art •ii:
17
.u� J ;djA II Turnun nr ' `"
{ �
`-JnL�n N Vp :L
jR
Runway 17 Departure Overflight Grid Analysis
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 8/1/2006-8/31/2006 1 -
�x�`�;��
Runway 17 Departure Overflight Grid Analysis
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 8/1/2006-8/31/2006 1 -
Runway 17 Carrier Jet -Departure Operations - 8/1/2006-8/31/2006
3365 (99.3%) West Bound Carrier Jet 25 (0.7%) Carrier Jet Departure
Departure Operations Flying the Runway 17 Jet Operations Turned West Before Passing Over the
Departure Procedure (Passing Over the 2.5 NM Runway 17 2.5 NIVI Turn Point. This is 1.5% of
Turn Point) and Runway 17 East Bound Carrier Jet 1686 westbound departures.
Departure Operation
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport Gate Plot
Runway 27 Departures That Turned West Before 2.5NM Turn Point
8/2/2006 00:00:00 - 8/31/2006 23:59:59
25 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left=2(8%), Right=23(92%)
16-w
0:
.0
140
00
OD
1200
0
1000
foo0
0
O
44
O
400
IS
ZQO
_i.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.3 1.0 i2
(RUnWay End) (Corridor End)
Deviation From Canter of Gate (Mlles)
vprev"ttrl in
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 81112006-813112006 - 2 -
Runwav 17 Niahttime Carrier Jet Dwarture Oaerations - 8/1/2006 - 8/31/2006
Lows FUR
IF
i — s Lrlydale Cil F'
W.V.Salld.P.97142
. xwa r�rsa
uth Sau� Pe
MSPMdA 'Id
Id
}Q� # L .
-
--� —moi. ,# � ;�� ._�'1 - _,r_.....-- "x__..___10 �,.�...�._ I � �,•j
t E { E 77
I.: M _ .
tt
f { �f
R tt +�4t ss
>r% m an7 . . ........
tE
� 9
p
-
{
!Apple Valley
O
25 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations off of
Runway 17 in 8/1/2006 - 8/31/2006 (10:30 p.m.-6:00a.m.)
—' 4 (4%) West Bound Carrier Jet i 1 (4%) West Bound Carrier Jet
Departures Turned West Between 2.5 and 3.0 NM I Departures Turned West After 3.0 NM from Start of
from Start of Takeoff and Remained Over the Takeoff and Remained Over the Minnesota River
Minnesota River Valley (trending with Runway 17 Valley (trending with Runway 17 River Departure
River Departure Heading) Procedure)
2 (8%) Carrier Jet Departures Turned 21 (84%) Remaining West Bound Carrier
West Before Passing Over the Runway 17 2.5 NM Jet Departures Flew the Runway 17 Jet Departure
Turn Point Procedure (Passing Over the 2.5 NM Turn Point),
and with an enroute heading to the destination
airport
0 (0%) Other Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 8/1/2006-8/31/2006 -3-
late
3-late
Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations
1 i f qui i
f 3 3; 4
ff `
l { .:. 3 . rtwv ,iire 'e HnYphtis
Bbo-
�x
tk
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 8/1/2006-8/31/2006 - 4 -
�7
Analvsis of Aircraft Noise Levels - DNL dBA 8/1/2006-8/31/2006
Date
#30
#31
#32
#33
#34
#35
#36
#37
#38
#39
1
60.6
46.1
43.3
48
43.5
49.7
49.4
46.8
46.3
48.6
2
49.4
NA
NA
NA
32.2
52.1
55.7
NA
NA
26.5
3
55.4
41.8
40.2
47.1
38.5
54.2
55.7
31
25
NA
4
60.3
47.5
24.6
50
42.7
47.5
45.3
50.7
51.3
49
5
58.4
54.9
33.1
46.6
40.3
49.4
48.5
41.8
48.3
48.5
6
47.6
30.2
26.3
NA
NA
50.9
53.8
NA
43
NA
7
51.4
43.4
53.9
52.6
44.2
53.8
56.4
50.6
NA
NA
8
63.1
43.5
33.8
49.3
40.1
49.5
41.8
48.6
49.4
53.5
10
63.8
42.3
31.5
50.1
48.7
48.4
1 44.6
50.6
51.8
43.4
11
63.5
44.8
29.7
49.8
44.6
50.4
44.9
49.7
50.8
48.6
12
60.2
50.3
31.8
47.3
43.5
47.7
39.4
46.6
47.3
48.8
13
63.4
43.3
41
48
46.2
50.6
50.2
48.7
e 50.9
42.7
14
65.9
40.9
39.2
59.4
49.9
1 56.6
56.8
NA
NA
37.6
15 1
56.3
28.5
49.2
45.9
38.8
49
53.4
41.6
45.3
44.4
16
64.7
39.9
27.5
55
45.1
54.1
49.4
51.6
52.3
51.9
17
63.5
48.8
40.2
51.5
46.3
46.6
40.5
51.3
51.7
49.6
18
63.3
41
36.2
50.5
45.9
49
41.9
48.6
50.2
51.9
19
56.3
NA
38.6
44
41.5
49.9
54.1
47.4
26.7
33.8
20
64
38.6
42.8
52.4
47.4
57.2
55.4
49.8
49.5
48.3
21
61.8
43.7
51.7
46.8
38.9
56.8
55.4
44.8
43.4
NA
22
63.1
45.6
44.6
45.8
43:1
52.5
53.4
41
45.1
42.4
23
65.1
43.7
33.6
53.7
47.4
48.1
42.1
47.8
49.9
53.8
24
68.4
50.5
42.2
53.4
52.6
48
45
43.6
44.6
49
25
54.1
45.5
50.2 j
46_.4
44.6
53.7
54.9
48.3
52
39.6
26
58.8
36.6
43.9 1
41.4
44.8
51.7
55.3
NA
NA
NA
27
60.7 '
38.1
NA
45.7
38.5
49.3
50.9
46.2
50.4
43.7
28
50.4
37.4
43.5
44.2
34.5
53
55.9
37
39.6
NA
29
54.5
38.4
43.2
35.4
45.1
50.5
54.4
45.1
29.5
NA
30
66.3
51.4
46.2
51.9
48.9
53.9
49.9
51.8
52.3
49.3
31
65
45.6
36.8
51.9
44.7
47.8
45.4
50.1
51.8
52.1
Av. DNL j
62.4
45.9
45.1
50.7
45.3
52
52.4
47.9
48.8
47.8
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 8/1/2006-8/31/2006 -5-
,!!Y g
5-
,!!Yg
Community Vs. Aircraft Noise Levels
DNL dBA 8/1/2006-8/31/2006
RMT
Community DNL.
08/01/03-08/31/03
Community. DNL
08/01/04-08/31/04 W
Community DNL. *Aircraft DNL
08/01105-08/31 /05 8/l/ 2 006-8/31 /2006
30
59.5
57.9
61.6 62.4 j
31
64.7
59.1
63.4 45.9
32
58.4
57
60.1 45.1
33
57.1
55.9
60.2 50.7
34
58
57.3
59 45.3
35 _
61
60.7
61.4 52
36
61.2
61.2
62.8 52.4
37
63.2
63.4
64.2 47.9
38
60
59.1
61.8 48.8
39
60.7
60.3
61 47.8
Top 15 Runway 17 Departure Destination Report
Airport !
City
Heading (deg.)
#Ops
199
Percent & Total 'Ops
5.9%
[-DEN DENVER I 237°
DFW
DALLAS/ FORT WORTH
1930 _
190
5.6%
MDW
CHICAGO (MIDWAY)
124°
143
4.2%
ORD
CHICAGO (O'HARE)
124'
135
4%
PHX
PHOENIX
231°
120
3.5%
IAH
HOUSTON
1850
110
3.2%
LAS
LAS VEGAS
243°
103
3%
STL
ST LOUIS
160°
93
2.7%
ATL
ATLANTA
149°
92
2.7%
CVG
CINCINNATI
127°
79
2.3%
MCO
ORLANDO
! 151-
69
2%
OMA,
OMAHA
205°
58
1.7%
LNK
LINCOLN
208°
57
1.7%
FSD
SIOUX FALLS
245°
54
1.6%
SAN
SAN DIEGO
235°
54
1.6%
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 8!1/2006-8/3112006 -6-
S9
6-
V 9
Taxes Payable 2006 Residential Market Value Calculator
Taxes Payable Estimated Market Value: To calculate insert market value in cell D23
Credit Calculation:
.4% of market value to maximum of $304 credit
Phased out over $76,000 in market value:
Reduced by $9.00 for every $10,000 of value over $76,000 -Zeros out at $413,777
Example Table
Taxable
Market
Value
Credit
$ 50,000
200.00
$ 60,000
240.00
$ 70,000
280.00
$ 76,000
304.00
$ 100,000
282.40
$ 125,000
259.90
$ 150,000
237.40
$ 200,000
192.40
$ 300,000
102.40
$ 400,000
12.40
$ 413,777
0.00
$ 278,021
122.18
S1
U)
j m
X 0
CD
0000
C)
CL 000
C7i 11
N�00
N
~DO
r-0
X.
=�
w 0)
v
m
W
C C C
CD
p.
= 0
7 3 Q
Q. Q 0C7
C
Iz
— O
Q
0
y o to
V
T.
D
O
S1
6A
j m
X 0
0 0
0000
N O
CL 000
C7i 11
N�00
i W W
~DO
V
i
OD
N O
v
A W�
W
co
0) � W
N 01
000 m
N
co
�1
N
x
4.9
c0 OD
i
W Cn
Cn
OD
W
V
CA
07A
O
C
C
C t:
64
K`
� R
6A
j m
O
i 0)
CO
N O
C7i 11
`fi
i W W
~DO
V
i
O O
0
ACOW
�C
i
W
N 01
C
N
co
O
N
x
V
CO
N
CL
O
0)
OD
OD
N
CA
Cl
4.9
c0 OD
i
W Cn
Cn
OD
W
V
CA
07A
O
C
C
C t:
64
K`
� R
Y
j m
O
i 0)
CO
N O
i
`fi
W
46
V
W CO
O O
O
co
W
4.9
c0 OD
i
W Cn
Cn
OD
W
V
CA
07A
O
C
C
C t:
64
K`
� R
j m
00
00
x a_
0
`fi
� X
N
CD
O O
0 0
C..
�C
N 01
C
N
N
x
<G CG O
O
N
CL
O
p1
C
N
3
0
CD C
�
W i
c
CD x
3
N
CD
CD
N
(D x
n
(p70w
'.Od
cr
-
m n
0) 0 CD
�
<
i O
N n
10
CD 0
CD nm nm
�,nx
CD
c Q.
M
°�
R <
0 CD O
m
m
a
O
mac
c
CD
CD
CSD
x
0
M.
D1
Cl) wCA
C'!
^��.
tOn
. .
CU Vii• N
C `
O
NCD
C
N
CD
(D
M
n
� �
d
0•
CD
C3 'D
CL
a
m
00000
O
0000
e�
O
o0
O
oox
Df
E�00-0
io�a
P.
NCO
ON
OIN/;
N
-Oii
COON
V
i.4�6
O Wy,
69
Ol
CON
O A (3) 0
-I -ICO
Cn
0007i�-Pk-
V O CT
CJi W
yi
0 W
COiO
.+
OD
0)CJl000
000OO
N N
0
W
OD
C
c jE
a' x
Q w
ami
� °�—'
CD
CD
49
6s
69
CA)
i
W
CCA 4�6
v
A V
-'
O 9)
p V
W p
CA i
0) O
O 000
G) N
W O
4.9
c0 OD
i
W Cn
Cn
OD
W
V
CA
07A
O
C
C
C t:
64
K`
� R
j m
x a_
N 3
CT
N
CD
N
�C
N
N
x
� �
CD �
p1
N
O
C N
0
CD C
W i
CD
00 C)
0
N
CD
(p70w
cr
0
i O
10
�
Pj\�
CD
e i
V
O
x
0
D1
C'!
C:
O
3
N
M
N
CL
a
m
T
e�
3
7
d
to
69
69
69 69
CA
N
N
V V
OD OD
0~0
0�0
N N
0
0
October 5, 2006
Orfield Laboratories Inc
oes�gn
q�oGSr,Re�,earc
os / Lb h'Q�tj4
l-s�o�i
i
Ci
9�
9r
IQ�
fG
r�
�f
N
N�
n�
PREPARED FOR
Mr. Jason Ziemer
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Phone (651) 675-5014
Fax (651) 675-5012
e-mail jziemer@cityofeagan.com
PREPARED BY
Elliott B. Dick
Orfield Laboratories, Inc.
2709 East 25th Street
Minneapolis MN 55406
Phone (612) 721-2455
Fax (612) 721-2457
e-mail elliott@orfieldlabs.com
MEMORANDUM 03 REGARDING
j Noise Impact Analysis of New Airport Runway 17/35
Project New Runway Noise Analysis
Client City of Eagan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport new Runway 17/35 impacts the
noise levels in Eagan. The City of Eagan contracted week-long noise
measurements before the new runway was completed, and again after the new
runway began use. These measurements show some trends through qualitative
analysis which we may generalize to certain areas of Eagan. Statistical analysis
somewhat supports these generalizations. .
In the western part of Eagan, day-to-day levels were relatively consistent before
the new runway. Now the new runway is operational, and the western part of
Eagan experience higher noise levels on days where departures are routed
south off runway 17/12. At the same time, northeastern Eagan is experiencing
slightly lower noise levels now that the new runway is in use. This is likely due tc
lower use of those runways facing that area of Eagan. In general, the
northeastern area of Eagan also experiences the same higher noise levels on
days with southerly routed departures.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Background ................................
Overall Comparison ....................
Runway Use Statistics ................
Qualitative Analysis ....................
Statistical Analysis ......................
Discussion of Individual Sites .....
Conclusion ..................................
Appendix A: Runway Use Statistics
Appendix B: Data Collection Locations ........
Appendix C: Hourly Measured Sound Levels
3
7
7
9
.....14
MFi
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
BACKGROUND
The City of Eagan wishes to evaluate the noise impact of the Minneapolis/St.
Paul International Airport (MSP) new Runway 17/35. In June 2005, the City
contracted Wyle Laboratories to conduct the initial measurement set before the
runway opened. The new runway began use October 27, 2005. Orfield
Laboratories conducted a second measurement set in June 2006. The second
measurement was executed to be similar to the first in most respects. In order to
get a as true a comparison as possible, the same equipment and settings were
used as in Wyle Lab's initial measurement.
OVERALL COMPARISON
The day -night average sound level was measured at ten locations. The
averaging period was week in June of 2005, before runway 17/35 was complete,!
and June of 2006, after runway 17/35 was operational. Figure 1 shows the
before/after comparison for each site. Locations are identified in detail in
Appendix B.
The day -night average, expressed LoN or DNL, is the equivalent sound level
over a 24-hour day with 10 dB added to nighttime levels (from 22:00 to 07:00).
This is the preferred metric of the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), as
well as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
70
65
z
O 50
J
d
iu 45
35
30
Site 7 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Site 7 Site 8 Site 9 Site 10
Figure 1: LpN Comparison
Orfield Laboratories Inc
• R A N !
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City Of Eagan OrFeld Laboratories Inc
At some locations, the overall levels increased, and at other locations they
decreased. One should not read too much into this direct comparison. There are
many variables, other than the new runway, which may cause the change in
result. Some of these factors are explored below.
RUNWAY USE STATISTICS
The number of over -flights will greatly impact the noise level. The Minneapolis
Airports Commission keeps records of their runway use statistics, and the daily
statistics are easily accessible. These data are used in this analysis, here
qualitatively, and later statistically.
The runway use provides an estimate of traffic over the measurement sites.
Flights will differ in elevation and direction depending on weather conditions and
their origin or destination. The number of overflights at a location will correlate
well with runway use, though runway use does not directly predict overflight.
2000
C
0 1500
- -
- -
--
---- -----
---
4/22
x17/35 ■ 17135
1000
12R/30L
--
___-
- --
R
a
------
---
121-/30R
m
---�-----
-
>'
-�
----
---- --
500
-
----
---
c,
as
a
-
0
-
Week Week Week
beginning beginning beginning
6113105 6/13/06 6/20/06
Figure 2: Runway Use over Measurement Periods
The overall runway use is shown in Figure 2. The first thing to notice is runway 1
17/35 is handling approximately 13% of the traffic during the 2006 measurement
periods.
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
The next observation is there were approximately 10% more flights over the first
week — before runway 17/35 was operational. This may have an effect on the
noise levels — namely understating the noise levels over the 2006 measurement
periods. Normalizing the measurement result to the runway traffic is one way to
estimate the rough impact of this change. It would depress the 2006 overall LoN
measurement by 0.5 dB, a relatively insignificant change for a week-long
duration.
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300 —.
200
100--
0
� J
c �2
Week beginning Week beginning
6/13/D5 6/13/06
Figure 3: Direction of runway use
Week beginning
6/20/06
E SW
■ SE
US
NW
NE
N
Figure 3 shows the runway use for each runway, and the direction of the runway
used. That is, departures which take off towards the south are grouped with
arrivals approaching from the south. We will analyze these southern .flights to
estimate the over -flight traffic over Eagan. Daily flights arriving from or departing
to the south are shown in Figure 4, Figure 5, and Figure 6.
Runway 12U30R and 12R/30L run parallel to each other, from the northeast to
the southwest. These runways face the north end of Eagan. Runway 17/35, the
new runway runs south over the western end of Eagan. The south end of
runway 4/22 faces into Bloomington, and only some of the departures will turn to
fly over Eagan. This runway is used very little, so the impact of these statistics
will be insignificant.
0
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan.
+, 500 —
0 400 -
ce
300 -3Y - - -- - -
200 - -
m
` 100
tz
GP O N O N O N
N N O N .� O N O N CV
O N O N O N
J R� Cl -
J J 2' J
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
611312005(6/14/2005k7415/2D056/16120056/171200516118120C)56/19/200516/20/20056/211200,g
X.Arrivals ® Departures
Figure 4: Daily runway use, week beginning 6113/2005
(flights arriving from or departing to southern end of runway)
500 ---
c
o 400
>
300
200 Ac -W
100 J O N J N� J O N '..� .1f1 N �^ -j ON S J 1A N d'
d 0 0 [`i N O O N O O= N O O M N O cD N o c [Q B O O lO N IQ C1 N
�n����4��nM�4� �1Q12r.— S2Qt-'!'o
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
6113/200616/1412006 6/15/200616116/2006 6/1712006 6/16/2006 6119/200616120/2006
& Arrivals u Departures
Figure 5: Daily runway use, week beginning 6/13/2006
j (flights arriving from or departing to southern end of runway)
500
0 400
V
300
200
c
w
m 100
R 0
Q
0
O N d' JIB N CC J u) NIS
O O (�'1 N O O 9J M N O O m N O O [c7 N O O M cN
J Q' "• J N c4 N N N N
N N N N
6123/200616/24/200616/2512006 6/26/200616/27/2006
Arrivals a Departures
Figure 6: Daily runway use, week beginning 6/20/2006
(flights arriving from or departing to southern end of runway)
6C57
I��yY
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan Orrield Laboratories Inc
It is also worthwhile noting the relative number of arrivals versus departures over
Eagan. Wind conditions determine the direction to land and take -off. Runway
use during the first measurement period in 2006 is consistent with the period in
2005. Runway use over the second measurement period in 2006 has a much
higher number of arrivals than departures. These differences are shown in
Figure 7.
Week beginning 6113/05 Week beginning 6/13/06 Week beginning 6/20/06
Arrivals ■ Departures r Arrivals ■ Departures Arrivals m Departures
Figure 7: All runways comparison of arrivals vs. departures
(flights arriving from or departing to southern end of runway)
Arrivals will have a different noise characteristic than departures. Arrivals will
approach in-line with the runway, at a lower altitude, and with a lower engine
speed. Departures will use a greater engine speed, and after clearing the end of
the runway climb and turn as quickly as possible. The noise impact of each will
depend on the location of the site, and its relation to the runway.
QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
Qualitative analyses are performed in this study by examining the results and
observe trends and relationships. From this examination we infer that one event
may cause another event. At its essence, the qualitative analysis is a means to
construct hypotheses. Graphs of data are the most useful tool to visually
discover these potential trends and relationships. Appendix C contains the
hourly and daily results shown in graphs.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS -
The daily measurements and daily runway use statistics were entered into
statistical analysis software. Table 1shows the Pearson correlation between
individual measurement sites and runway use.
The Pearson correlation coefficient measures linear correlation or predictability
between two variables. The value of the coefficient varies between -1 and +1. A
value of +1 indicates that one variable can be predicted perfectly by the other. A
value of -1 means the same thing except that the variables are inversely related.
A Pearson correlation of 0 indicates that neither of.the two variables can be
predicted from the other by using a linear equation.
toi?
G
Project New Runway Noise Monitor i
Client City of Eagan Orfield Laboratories Inc
Table 1: Pearson Correlation of Daily Noise Levels
Correlations
12L
12R
17
Departu
30R
Departu
30L
Departu
35
R es
Arrivals
res
Arrivals
res
Arrivals
Site 1 Pearson
0.030
-0.028
-0.142
-0.017
0.468
-0.028
Correlation
Sig. (2 -tailed)
0.916
0.922
0.613
0.953
0.079
0.922
N
15
15
15
15
1 15
15
Site 2 Pearson
0.375
-0.265
0.209
-0.158
0.481
-0.673
Correlation
Sig. (2 -tailed)
0.207
0.382
0.494
0.605
0.096
0.012
N
13
13
13
13
13
13
Site 3 Pearson
0.398
-0.363
0.245
-0.317
0.636
-0.427
Correlation
Sig. (2 -tailed)
0.142
0.183
0.379
0.250
0.011
0.113
N
15
15
15
15
15
15
Site 4 Pearson
-0.373
0.151
-0.479
0.033
0.365
0.740
Correlation
Sig. (2 -tailed)
0.171
0.590
0.071
0.908
0.181
0.002
N
15
15
15
• 15
15
15
Site 5 Pearson
-0.385
0.235
-0.389
0.102
-0.190
0.737
Correlation
Sig. (2 -tailed)
0.156
0.400
0.152
0.717
0.499
0.002
N
15
15
15
15:
15
15
Site 6 Pearson
0.053
-0.204
-0.167
-0.309
0.661
0.201
Correlation
Sig. (2 -tailed)
0.852
0.466
0.553
0.263
0.007
0.472
N
15
15
115
15
0.536
15
15
Site 7 Pearson
-0.581
0.610
-0.613
-0.107
0.329
Correlation
Sig. (2 -tailed)
0.023
0.016
0.015
0.039
0.705
0.231
N
15
15
15
15
15
15
Site 8 Pearson
0.278
-0.139
0.221
-0.026
0.223 -0.726
Correlation
Sig. (2 -tailed)
0.336
0.635
0.449
0.930
0.443 0.003
N
14
14
14
14
14 14
Site 9 Pearson
0.379
-0.331
0.407
-0.200
0.050
-0.350
Correlation
Sig. (2 -tailed)
0.163
0.229
0.132
0.475
0.861
0.201
N
15
15
15
15
15
15
Site Pearson
0.194
-0.107
0.087
-0.126
0.254
-0.449
10 Correlation
Sig. (2 -tailed)
0.488
0.704
0.758
0.654
0.362
0.093
N
15
15
15
15
15
15
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2 -tailed). [bold, underline]
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2 -tailed). [Bold]
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan Orfield Laboratories Inc
There were few statistically significant correlations in this matrix. This is mainly
due to the small number of cases (days) and the great variability in aircraft noise
from day-to-day. In general, the correlation coefficients somewhat support the
qualitative analysis at most sites.
DISCUSSION OF INDIVIDUAL SITES
ANALYSIS AT SITE 1
The Site 1 day -night average level over the 2006 measurement period increased
overall from the 2005 measurement. The overall increase is expected, due to
flights from runway 17/35 in 2006, which were not present in the 2005
measurement.
A qualitative analysis of the daily and hourly noise levels show the behavior of
noise at Site 1 is consistent with the noise at other nearby sites, and consistent
with its relation to the airport runways. This position is approximately 4 % miles
south -by -southeast of runway 17/35. During the 2006 measurement period,
days where runway 17/35 was mainly used for departures also showed
increased noise levels in Leq, LDN, L10, and Lot.
The statistical analysis generally supports the qualitative analysis. Noise levels
at Site 1 correlates very poorly with all runway use, except for runway 17/35. It
shows some correlation between departures off the south end of runway 17135,
though the correlation is not statistically significant.
ANALYSIS AT SITE 2
The Site 2 day -night average level over the 2006 measurement period
decreased overall from the 2005 measurement. This is due to a decrease in the
nighttime hourly average levels (L,,). There is no clear explanation for the
nighttime measurements. The daytime average levels did increase from the
2005 measurement to the 2006 measurement.
A qualitative analysis shows that, over the 2006 measurement, the Leq LDN, L50,
1_90, and L99 measurements were higher on days with heavier departures.
However, L10 and L01 are much higher than L50 at other sites on these days. The
difference between L10 and 'L50 is smaller at this site on the departure -heavy
days.
This may be due to departures, this far from the airport, are high enough in
elevation that they can be heard over a longer duration. The engine noise builds
slowly and dies slowly, rather than getting a shorter blast of engine noise. This
position is approximately 5 Y2 miles south -by -southeast of runway 17/35.
On days with heavier arrivals, L10 and L01 are much higher than at this site. This
may be due to arrivals, at their lower elevation, exposing this site to shorter
durations of their engine noise. The engine usually runs lower at arrivals, so the
overall noise dropped on these days.
Most sites are within a mile of a either Highway 77 or Interstate 35E (excepting
Site 5, Site 6, and Site 9). This site is approximately a half -mile from both
highways, one on either side. This may also contribute to the noise, as it does at
other sites. Rush hour traffic is reflected in the statistical measurements as well.
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
Statistical analysis generally -supports the qualitative analysis. There is relatively
poor correlation of the daily noise levels and the runway use, except for runway
17/35. Though the correlation is poor, it is consistent in that departures are
slightly correlated with higher noise levels and arrivals are slightly correlated
with lower noise levels. This is consistent between sites 2, 3, 8, 9, and 10.
The departures off 17/35 are somewhat correlated with higher noise levels at
Site 2. Interestingly, lower noise levels are correlated with arrivals onto 17/35
with statistical significance.
ANALYSIS AT SITE 3
The Site 3 day -night average level over the 2006 measurement period did not
differ much overall from the 2005 measurement. The daily and hourly noise
levels show the behavior of noise at Site 3 is somewhat consistent with the
noise at other nearby sites. This position is approximately 5 miles south -by -
southeast of runway 17/35.
A qualitative analysis shows that, during the 2005 measurement period, the daily
average noise levels (LpN) varied little, except nighttime levels were responsible
for higher LpN some days. The statistical metrics (L,) while varying hour -to -hour,
exhibited similar behaviors day-to-day. During the 2006 measurements, the daily
Leq, LpN, L,o, and Lo, results seemed to increase on days where runway 17/35
was mainly used for departures. The meter did not measure a full Day with
heavy departures over Eagan. This was due to an overnight meter malfunction.
Perhaps if the departure -heavy days been measured in full, the overall results
would have been higher at this location.
Statistical analysis generally supports the qualitative analysis. There is relatively
poor correlation of the daily noise levels and the runway use, except for runway
17/35. Though the correlation is poor, it is consistent in that departures are
slightly correlated with higher noise levels and arrivals are slightly correlated
with lower noise levels. This is consistent between sites 2, 3, 8, 9, and 10.
There is a statistically significant correlation between noise levels and the
number of flight departures on runway 17/35. At Site 3, like site 2, arrivals off the
17/35 runway are correlated with higher noise levels, but without statistical
significance.
ANALYSIS AT SITE 4
The Site 4 day -night average level over the 2006 measurement period increased
overall from the 2005 measurement. The behavior.of noise at this site, however,
is inconsistent with the noise at other nearby sites, nor consistent with its
relation to the airport runways. This position is approximately 6 Y2 miles south-
, by -southeast of runway 17/35.
This monitor location overlooked a busy city street. Most of the noise was road
traffic, as evidenced by the traffic cycles, especially in the L50 measurement. It
was more pronounced in the 2006 measurement than the 2005 measurement.
Noise levels were consistent day-to-day (a little lower over the weekends),
whereas most other sites exhibited different noise characteristics depending on
the number of arrivals versus departures over Eagan.
0
Orfield Laboratories Inc
• , V
i
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan Orfield Laboratories Inc
Statistical analysis shows correlations which do not represent the probable
overflight noise. This may be due to the fact that the flight arrivals over Eagan
heavily outnumbered departures during the 2006 measurement, which was also,
in general, higher in noise level. The data from this site was heavily influenced
by the traffic noise.
ANALYSIS AT SITE 5
The Site 5 day -night average level over the 2006 measurement period increased
overall from the 2005 measurement. Despite this, the behavior of noise at Site 5
is inconsistent with expatiations and the noise at other nearby sites.
Note that the normal diurnal cycle disappears after June 21, 2006. Usually every'
metric drops through the small hours of the morning. This daily cycle can be
observed on the hourly percentile level graphs. At Site 5, the Lo, and 1-10
measurements remain relatively constant.
This is likely due to a babbling brook in the neighbor's back yard that ran down
the hill. The brook was still under construction Tuesday and Wednesday. The
construction may account for much of the high daytime levels. The brook was
running constantly since Wednesday, and the sound levels never dropped much
below 45 dB at the monitoring station.
This position is approximately 6 Y2 miles southeast of runway 17/35. The 1-01
measurement may reflect a higher number of departures than arrivals over
Eagan, but it is not significant.
Statistical analysis showed correlations which were similar to Site 4, but not to
other sites. There is probably a similar reason for this: the noise levels were
generally higher during the 2006 measurement, and the number of arrivals
greatly outnumbered the number of departures during the same period.
ANALYSIS AT SITE 6
The Site 6 day -night average level over the 2006 measurement period increased
overall from the 2005 measurement. The overall increase is expected, due to
flights from runway 17/35 in 2006, which were not present in the 2005
measurement.
This position is approximately 6'h miles southeast of runway 17/35. Qualitative
analysis shows that, despite being further away, the behavior of noise at Site 1
is consistent with closer sites and consistent with its relation to the airport
runways. During the 2006 measurement period, days where runway 17/35 was
mainly used for departures also showed increased .daily and hourly noise levels
in Leq, LDN, 1-10, and 1-01.
The statistical analysis generally supports the qualitative analysis. Noise levels
at Site 1 correlates very poorly with all runway use, except for runway 17/35. It
shows statistically significant correlation between noise levels and departures off
the south end of runway 17/35.
0-[
Project New Runway Noise Monitor 4
Client City of Eagan Orfield Laboratories Inc
ANALYSIS AT SITE 7
The Site 7 day -night average level over the 2006 measurement period increased'
overall from the 2005 measurement. The overall increase is expected, due to
flights from runway 17/35 in 2006, which were not present in the 2005
measurement.
Qualitative analysis of the daily and hourly noise levels show the behavior of
noise at Site 7 is consistent with the noise at other nearby sites, and consistent
with its relation to the airport runways. This position is approximately 5 miles
southeast of runway 17/35. During the 2006 measurement period, days where
runway 17/35 was mainly used for departures also showed increased noise
levels in Leq, LpN, 1_10, and LD1.
Site 7 was located on top of a hill, without any nearby trees or structures.
Without anything to break up the sound of overflights, this site had higher results
than the other sites. Overflight noise would be recorded from further away, and
the ground effect will also moderately increase the noise. Traffic noise probably
also influenced both the 2005 and 2006 measurements at Site 7.
Statistical analysis is contrary to the qualitative analysis. Reasons for this are
not immediately apparent. For answers, this may require additional research,
testing, or analysis.
ANALYSIS AT SITE 8
The Site 8 day -night average level over the 2006 measurement period
decreased overall from the 2005 measurement. In part, this is due to a decrease
in the nighttime hourly average levels (Leq). Also, for days with a light number of
departing flights, the daytime level was lower in 2006 than it was in the 2005
measurement period. There is no clear explanation for the nighttime
measurements, nor the decrease in levels on particular days.
During the 2006 measurement period, behavior of noise at Site 8 is consistent
with the noise at other nearby sites, and consistent with its relation to the airport
runways. This position is approximately 4 miles southeast of runway 17/35.
Days where runway 17/35 was mainly used for departures the daily and hourly
noise levels also showed increased noise levels in Leq, LpN, L10, and 1 -01 -
Statistical analysis generally supports the qualitative analysis. There is relatively,
poor correlation of the daily noise levels and the runway use, except for runway
17/35. Though the correlation is poor, it is consistent in that departures are
slightly correlated with higher noise levels and arrivals are slightly correlated
with lower noise levels. This is also consistent between sites 2, 3, 8, 9, and 10.
The departures off 17/35 are somewhat correlated with higher noise levels at
Site 8. Interestingly, lower noise levels are correlated with arrivals onto 17/35
with statistical significance.
"_73
Project New Runway Noise Monitor 'r
Client City of Eagan Orfield Laboratories Inc
ANALYSIS AT SITE 9
The Site 9 day -night average level over the 2006 measurement period
decreased overall from the 2005 measurement. The overall decrease is
expected, due to fewer flights over Eagan from runways 12U30R and 12R/30L
in the 2006 measurement, which were. diverted to runway 17/35.
The daily and hourly noise levels show the behavior of noise this site is
consistent with the noise at the nearby Site 10, and consistent with its relation to
the airport runways. This position is approximately 5 miles southeast of runway
12R/30L. Sites 9 and 10 are closer to the 12U30R and 12R/30L. runways than to
the 17/35 runway.
During both the 2005 measurement period and the 2006 measurement period,
days where runways were- mainly used for departures over Eagan also showed
increased noise levels in Leq, LDN, L,o, and Lo,. In general, all metrics Site 9 were
lower in 2006 than they were in the 2005 measurement.
Statistical analysis generally supports the qualitative analysis. There is relatively
poor correlation of the daily noise levels and the runway use. Though the
correlation is poor, it is consistent in that departures are slightly correlated with
higher noise levels and arrivals are slightly correlated with lower noise levels.
There is little correlation with runway 17/35 at this site. That is reasonable, since
Site 9 and 10 are located under the flight path of the 12/30 runways.
ANALYSIS AT SITE 10
The Site 10 day -night average level over the 2006 measurement period
decreased overall from the 2005 measurement. The overall decrease is
expected, due to fewer flights over Eagan from runways 12U30R and 12R/30L
i
in the 2006 measurement, which were diverted to runway 17/35.
The daily and hourly noise levels show the behavior of noise this site is
consistent with the noise at the nearby Site 9, and consistent with its relation to
the airport runways. This position is approximately 2'/4 miles southeast of
runway 12R/30L. Sites 9 and 10 are closer to the 12U30R and 12R/30L
runways than to the 17/35 runway.
During both the 2005 measurement period and the 2006 measurement period,
days where runways were mainly used for departures over Eagan also showed
increased noise levels.in Leq, LDN, 1_10, and Lot: In general, most metrics at Site
10 were similar in 2006 than they were in the 2005 measurement.
Statistical analysis generally supports the qualitative analysis. There is relatively
poor correlation of the daily noise levels and the runway use. Though the
correlation is poor, it is consistent in that departures are slightly correlated with
higher noise levels and arrivals are slightly correlated with lower noise levels.
There is little correlation with runway 17/35 at this site. That is reasonable, since
Site 9 and 10 are located under the flight path of the 12/30 runways.
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
CONCLUSION
In general, the new runway 17/35 does seem to have an impact on noise levels
in the City of Eagan. Since the overall number of flights during the measurement
periods were less after the new runway became operational, there is not a direct
comparison between the "before" and "after" condition on a city-wide basis.
Certainly, the impact is dependant on location, and the direction of arriving and
departing flights. The City of Eagan should continue to monitor aircraft noise
_�a_
OrField Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
APPENDIX A: RUNWAY USE STATISTICS
The runway use statistics used in this analysis were obtained from the
Minneapolis Airports Commission. Arrivals and departures which are bold in the
tables below either depart towards the south end of the runway or arrive from
the south end of the runway.
0
OrFeld Laboratories Inc
�WP
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan Orfield Laboratories Inc
Table A3: Runway Use Statistics, Week Beginning 6/13/2006
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Runway
0
M
0
v
0
0
0
ti
0
00
0
m
0
o
((n
((No
CO
CO
CO
Cfl
CO
Cfl
to
(.O
Departure
98
31
33
25
87
0
0
31
12L
s
8
7
4
1
Arrivals
11
33
35
27
11
0
0
35
4
4
9
4
9
2
Departures
261
3
0
28
4
0
39
2
30R
30
Arrivals
9
28
0
59
2
0
4
19
Departure
87
282
�
4
60
0
0
16
12R
Arrivals
11
30
34
27
13
0
0
34
3
3
4
5
6
7
12
7
0
25
4
$8
30
1
Departures
30L
282
Arrivals
2
14
0
48
5
21
1
17
Departure
71
10
17
21
81
0
0
24
s
4
2
9
3
35
Arrivals
5
0
0
2
45
6
4
0
Departures
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
4
Arrivals
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Departure
0,
1
0
3
4
2
1
1
22
s
Arrivals
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
Departures
69
66
70
67
59
61
65
71
Total
3
1
6
6
0
9
8
8
Arrivals
70
67
70
66
60
61
66
71
3
9
3
7
7
8
6
9
Departure
25
65
70
62
23
2
1
71
South
s
6
1
6
0
2
5
Arrivals
42
0
9
65
681
66
20
67
I
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
r
Client City Of Eagan Orfield Laboratories Inc
Table A4: Runway Use Statistics, Week Beginning 6/20/2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Runway
0
o
0
0
0
N
0
0
0
m
0
CIN
N
Q
Z6
iziz
CO
C(D
tom
m
(0
Co
to
Departure
311
2
2
9
46
0
2
0
12L
Arrivals
325
2
0
�
71
0
0
0
35
36
13
21
32
35
34
Departures
2
9
7
3
6
2
0
0
30R
28
28
10
19
25
30
24
Arrivals
19
5
6
5
4
0
4
6
i
0
Project Aircraft Noise Analysis
Client City of Eagan _i orfield Laboratories Inc
APPENDIX B: DATA COLLECTION LOCATIONS
Measurements were captured at each of ten sites used in the initial study. The
measurements occurred over two weeks with five noise analyzers, a week at
each site. The City made all arrangements with property owners. Locations are
described below and are shown in Figure 8.
Location Number 1:
j Private residence at street address 2037 Flint Lane;
'Northeast corner of backyard;
Latitude 440 48'39.3120" N, Longitude 93'-12'34.7004" W;
Monitor period from June 13 to 20, 2006.
Location Number 2:
Rahn Elementary School at street address 4424 Sandstone Drive;
South of athletic fields, On hill in clearing of deciduous tree grove;
Latitude 440 47'39.9120" N, Longitude 930 12'33.9624" W;
Monitor period from June 13 to 20, 2006.
Location Number 3:
Private residence at street address 4265 Beaver Dam Road;
Between two coniferous trees in western corner of backyard;
Latitude 440 48' 08.5824" N, Longitude 930 12' 08.6364" W;
Monitor period from June 13 to 20, 2006.
Location Number 4:
Private residence at street address 4850 North Safari Court;
Western perimeter of yard, within sight of moderate traffic road;
'Latitude 440 46'48.0756" N, Longitude 930 12' 10.3464" W;
Monitor period from June 20 to 27, 2006.
Location Number 5:
Private residence at street address 4730 Westminster Circle;
Southern corner of backyard, under trivial deciduous canopy;
Latitude 44° 47' 03.0480" N, Longitude 930 10'33.4488" W;
Monitor period from June 20 to 27, 2006.
Location Number 6:
Private residence at street address 1290 Wilderness Curve;
Southern perimeter of backyard, under trivial deciduous canopy;
Latitude 440 47' 37.0428" N, Longitude 930 09' 38.8944" W;
Monitor period from June 20 to 27, 2006.
Location Number 7:
Deerwood Elementary School at street address 1480 Deerwood Drive;
On hill between running track and tennis courts;
Latitude 440 48'34.6068" N, Longitude 93° 10'34.9608" W;
Monitor period from June 13 to 20, 2006.
KO
• R A N f
Project Aircraft Noise Analysis.
Client City of Eagan Orfield Laboratories Inc
Location Number 8:
Private residence at street address 3730 Blackhawk Road;
Near bottom of hill in backyard, under moderate deciduous canopy;
Latitude 440 49' 20.1360" N, Longitude 93° 11' 30.6636" W;
Monitor period from June 20 to 27, 2006.
Location Number 9.
Private residence at street address 860 Basswood Lane;
Southern corner of backyard;
Latitude 440 49' 22.8828" N, Longitude 93' 07' 56.1396" W;
Monitor period from June 20 to 27, 2006.
Location Number 10:
Private residence at street address 1490 McCarthy Road;
Southeast corner of backyard, at top of hill under trivial deciduous canopy;
Latitude 440 50'47.4108" N, Longitude 930 10'31.5444" W;
Monitor period from June 13 to 20, 2006.
Co m
AA' E PYA O R A N d UM
E f:
t INA dola HeagI"
5.� 1 I ■
� k e
I vp� _
e- ak R'd�
5
YanF,ec•E}uadl1Rdt
.�- Site 5
Sife 8
. •'� Site? y
d3i�}C yid.
","Pte 2 go
Cllii'Rd_ r ,utlff•Rd-----
M4
Sife 4
e
: � ='."�.a05 �ueopa ieglYnuf�pirs • ,
f a
Printer 44'49'36Aq ,,f4-S3IIo779.76' L'4" nicv 876 JI' 5liea ntng,lil!119if1 7oo'Eue, a;t 34eg5 fi
Orfleld Laboratories Inc
T- U')
GD CO
iz
N r
0
C �
O
d
H
O O
z a)
= %
c
L Q
a0
to t Q
to
LU m
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
m CO o W LO v C7
(add OZ 'QJ Vap) lana -1
4'
Q
m
a
c
:L�
O
Q
ED
J
I Orfield Laboratories Inc
0
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project
New Runway Noise Monitor
Client
City of Eagan
N
C N
N
C a
3 N
� r
O
N
C N
r
N
� N
O
C
r
O
Q
m
_ C Q
3.N
� r
O
J
r
O S
■
LD
�L
to
_
.Y
O �
O
O (6
Q
c
J
O 7
C L
t
m
�
ai
N
M
O
LO
C
O4—
O
y _
g
-
Z
C N
~
Q
L (D
L
O 5
O
Q
a O
C N
7
iL
(a o
co
m
R
W m
N
J
i C N
7 r
2
C Q
-
� N
r
l
r
7 N
� r
C N
3
coC
C N
7
� r
M
7
O O O O O O
O co N CD In It
O O O
M N r
(Odd 0Z,9j Vep) moy ay;;o %u p9p9a3x3 lana -1 :u-1
0
Orfield Laboratories Inc
r
L r
O C
L
d
H CID'0 C
Z p
i N
ao
a)
W
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
am g
CD m CON COO U-) VO' M N
(edri OZ 'aJ deP) lana
Q
m
a
J
a
Q
m
N
J
m
[J
J
7
g=
t
L
[A
Z
Q
m
a
J
Z
0
O
A
Orteld Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
Orfield Laboratories Inc
N LO
G) M
iz
N r
L
W CU
CO
G
N
ay
.O O
Z
L •�
L Q
a O
�o
tm
In
W
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
O O
O CO
I�
p
Orfield Laboratories Inc
O N
� r
N
C Q
O N
� r
O
N
C N
� r
O g
N
j
r
W
c N
� r
rn �
c Q
N
7 r
O N
C g
i Q
r7
^
O
L
C N
�
� r
f0
a
i-
C N
7
'7
C N
'r
rQ
C N
7
� r
LD
I
r �
Q
•-� � 7 N
� r
of S
I i iL
� � N
� r
C N
� r
C7
C
!
r
Q
�
O O O O O O O
N CO LO It m N r
Odd OZ 'aJ `d8P) lana -
I�
p
Orfield Laboratories Inc
N LO
4
N r
3
c
N
C
•0 O
Z
L �
V
L O
06
0 N
Wm
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
N
7
N
N 5
C Q
� N
O
N
C
� N
N
C Q
� N
O)
C N
O
r Q
c N
CO
G
i Q
C �
7
� N
a)) CD r- W � M N
• (edri OZ,al V90) moo a43;o %u papaaox3 lanai :u-1
7
0
a
t
F -
0
Orfeld Laboratories Inc
i
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan Laboratories Inc
N
�r�+ M
f 5izz
L V-
0
O C
� 3
Z p
i N
ao
L
t
m
W
o RN
= N
� r
O
N Q
ON
7
7 r
CD 5
C N
� r
(P �
i Q
j N
'7 r
CO
C N
7
CO
c N
� r
CD
�Q
CO
M
CN
:3r
C)
a) r- CCD COL It M N
(Edd OZ 'aJ VaP) lana -J
1
t
N
r M
N
o
Cc
O C
m �
Z Q
L Q
ao
ccL
I
cc
W
.M E•R A N f
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan OrIfield Laboratories Inc
C)
N
= N
7
� r
O
s N Q
N
'7 r
I
i O
- C N
7
� r
_ O
-- – �Q
� N
� r
O
C N m
CO J
3 N
� r m
r � o
c N J
7 �
r Q N v
-.
Cm
r O O
_• J
C N [D
O
O ^� J
�r m
= N
r
O
r
i
7 r
I C N
r Q
3 N
� r
r
C N
7
W COO N W V) dC. ' M N r
(edd OZ,9j y8P) moy a43;o %U Papaaox3 Iana-I :u-1
qTc)
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
'S
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
m COO O� to LO V M N
Medd OZ 'aj b8p) moy ay; }o %u pepaaox3 lana -1 ul
04F
Qo;M1
OrFeld Laboratories Inc
M
;5 M
f� N
V �
o >,
CO
CO C
G �
N N
'p C
Z O
07
L •�
C
L Q..
O
C L-
t
m
W
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
� Cp
CD r- (00 � 't (m N
(edd OZ 'aJ `deP) lana
R3
o 2
N Q
i
C N
I v
CD
c r
01 �
iQ
j N
CO
C N
O �
C N
C N
3
0
� � t
Q
� � m
O N
7
�¢
3 N
L
C N
3
((9 2
i Q
j N
� N
i Q
j N
M
C N
7
M �
'C Q
N
O �
s
5
Orfield Laboratories Inc
M
r (L;
L r
C0
G L
0
y. 0
�0 C
Z 0
L N
ao
R
Q
W
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
f0 �
.Q
=3N
.7 r
L
O O O O O O O O
m CO h t0 to d' M N
(edri OZ 'ai d8p) ino4 941 to %u p9p9aox3 lana -J :u-1
�7.
Orfield Laboratories Inc
L
0 j
WL
0 (D
_N c:
�O
Z 0)
to .0
L
L O
C �
0
� m
W
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
N R
m OOOm
D I- (p (n t7 m N
(Edd OZ'9J F/9P) lan9-1
qs
Fk-
m
(D
J
L
0
Z
m
a
a
J
2
O
2
F
T
f�
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Client City of Eagan
,�(p
Oriield Laboratories Inc
V
,4a M
N ti
V r
O >,
4.0 Co
CO C
G
d
H
�O C
Z O
� C
L �
ao
L
R
W
r k A N r
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan OrFeld Laboratories Inc
r- KN
O N
7
N
N
C N
N 2
N Q
j N
� r
N
CC N
7
i.t
m � � to LO 14- C07 N
(edd OZ'9J Vap) lana
F
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
r
N Q
j N
N
C N
7
CD
N Q
j N
Cf
C
D N
U')
N Q
C N
7
7 �
N R
c N
0
a s
N Q
C4 m
� a
N
D N
M 2
N Q
C
� N
c -
N S
N LL
c N
1!x
Medd OZ '91 VeP) lnoy aq to %U papaaoXg lanai :u-1
O
N Q
C N
3
Q
m
0)
J
Orfield Laboratories Inc
LO LO
G1 M
� r
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
O O O O O O O O
W CO I- (a () 'IT (h N
(edd OZ'GJ VaP) lana -J
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
CDD
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
lc)
Or field Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
i Dc}
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project _New Runway Noise Monitor -pTY`
Client City of Eagan Orfield Laboratories Inc
N
C N
N
C
� N
O S
C N
7 �
O n.
N
C
� N
O S
C N
7
O
C
7 �2
7
CO
C N
Q
C �
7
r
C �2
7
i
to
C N
L
C N
7
r
0) C3 ti COO M. v M CD
N
(Edd OZ 'aJ VOW lana
b3
Ch 5;
C N
O � r
VA
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
I Cq
%ttJ
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan T
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
,It
N
C7
N Q
j N
�r
N
N
C N
7
C) OD N f(00 U) � M N
(edri OZ 'aj b'i3p) inoy ay};o %u p9p9aax3 lanai :u-1
m
Q
m
R
O
J
0
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
1-67
0
OrFeld Laboratories Inc
' DS2
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Iti
M
c� r
O J+
.aM
OCC:
G t..
�_ a)
p
' C
Z 0
i (D
ao
ii
m a)
W
W
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
C) g
N s
C N
� r
m CO Imo- (p LO V M N
Medd OZ 'eJ VaP) lana
I ()q
z
K
NO
I"
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
ID
0
Orfield Laboratories Inc
L
O =
NO
(D a)
Z
C
L •_
v a)
L O
a
�m
cmW
O
d)
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
N 5
c Q
:3 N
� r
D7
N
� r
n
O N
7
-'7 r
n
C) p o p p p
00 f- fD LO V [h
(edrI OZ 'aJ b'9P) lana -J
C
6
Orfeld Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan OrFleld Laboratories Inc
119�
00
rcr)
izz
O
CO C
C �
_H N
�O C:
Z p
L N
ao
�D
�Q
W
D
Project New Runway Noise Monitor`;
1--
Client City of Eagan OrFeld Laboratories Inc
OOD O^ to M. � c� N
(edd OZ'OJ d8P) lana-
113
n
N
i
` N I
� r
N<
C N
7
O
N
i
C N
� r
Q
T c
N
C N �
� r
Q
CO
LO 5; a
C ¢ Cr
7 �2 J
.r
N
C N
7 O
O
N t
Q N N
7
r O T
� fad
C 3
0
N %
C N
� r L
D>
z
N Q )r
Q
m
N J
� r �
7
O
N =
C Q
3%
O
N � �
C N
7
N �
C Q
N
� r
O
N
C N
� I
O
N Q
C N
O � r
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
0.
Orfield Laboratories Inc
ise Monitor
N RE
O O O O O Cl O
CO ti O O V CO N
Medd OZ 'aJ b'8P) lana-
1(S7
Q
m
V
C
T
Q
m
6
J
T
Orfield Laboratories Inc
CD LO
4) M
h
� r
o
a)
Z O
C
L Q
3 O
�0
W m
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
N
c Q
= N
C N
7 �
W
C Q
= N
C N
ao g
Q
C N
� r
n
G N
7
m CCO ti CCO LO 't m N
(edd OZ,9j Vqp) ino4 94110 %u papaaox3 lana-j:u-j
0
OrField Laboratories Inc
CD
M
N
L �
o a
o c
L
d
A
r
�Q �
Z Q
C
L N
a0
c m
�a
W
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
I- RN
C N
7
r- g
N Q
= N
3
C
N
N
m 2
N Q
C N
N
N
= N
7
N
C
N
N
: N
N �
C
� N
O
N
c N
0) COr0. - ( (D to V m N
Medd OZ'9J d9P) lana -1
1177
Q
m
C
J
T
Q
m
Cr
J
m
m
R
Cr
J
0
2
L
Z
■
mm
Cr
J
Z
7
0
T
Orfield Laboratories Inc
M
L r
O A
f�
O C
CD
'Q C
Z Q
L N
ao
L
cc
W
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
r --
a
C
N
CO
N
C N
fD
N Q
1 �
N
ko RN
C N
r
LO 2
N
C QN
7
N
C
� N
O
� L
N Q �
j N f4
N
C N
co g
N Q
C N
N
C N
0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0
Of OD 1- O LO 7 M N
(edrl OZ,91 Vqp) inoy ey};o %u p9pe93x3 lana -1 :u-1
to
Orfeld Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
Cl)
Orfeld Laboratories Inc
0 to
y
L
Cr. _
C `
N C
Z O
$+ C
cc C
i Q
O
4)
Im
Ill m
Project New Runway Noise Monitor L"
Client City of Eagan Orfield Laboratories Inc
CO CD
h (O LO V M N
Medd OZ 'aj b'9P) .inoy ay} }o %u Papaaox3 lanai :u-1
4
N
� N
� �
I
I
:3 N
O 5
N �l
C N
N �
C N
3
C N
CD
Q
a
c N
7
�
J
J
W
� N
m3
CO g
o
C Q
J
7
0
Q
m
N
C N
[6
p
J
C Q
N
F
Q
7
m
m �
o
J
C N
7
� �
Q
Q
V
C
�
7 �
� �
�
J
r
� N
7
� r
Lr)
_ � N
r
� N
i
r �
Q
C N
7
r
C
3 N
Q
C
r
� 7
1 ��
r
d LO
y,+ C`7
L T
0 cc
QO
C L
H
Z O
L
a�
0
ca
R
W
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
o g
N Q
i
j N
CD
C T
m �
i Q
j N
CO
c N
a0 �
O N
_
n
C N
7
O
Q N
j �2 N
CD
G N
_
7 �
C N
L
C N
7 �
GN_
7 �
V
Y '
0) OD O^ (D (LO � C. M N
Medd OZ'9J d8P) lan9-1
gal
4
Orfield Laboratories Inc
Project New Runway Noise Monitor
Client City of Eagan
C)
W N (O (LO � M N ' T
(edd OZ 'ai b'9p) ino4 a4;;o %u p9p99ox3 lana-? :u-1
i
baa
Q
m
'O
O
J
■
m
m
0
J
m
z
O
J
m
O
O
J
Q
m
O
J
0,
Orrield Laboratories Inc
C)
N
C N
� T
O
N .¢
C
3 r
= N
' T
I
C
� N
CO
C N
T
O �
_
�a
N
'
E N
O
7
O
L
T Q
j N l6
ffl
C N
� T
� N
LO
i
C N
7
� T
r
O N
T
T
� N
7 T
c N
� T
M�
C N
7 T
7
M
C
C)
W N (O (LO � M N ' T
(edd OZ 'ai b'9p) ino4 a4;;o %u p9p99ox3 lana-? :u-1
i
baa
Q
m
'O
O
J
■
m
m
0
J
m
z
O
J
m
O
O
J
Q
m
O
J
0,
Orrield Laboratories Inc
1C-�3
I-,
Orfield Laboratories Inc
06/20/2006
AIRPORTS AND AVIATION
INTRODUCTION
As a neighbor to Minneapolis — St. Paul (MSP) International Airport, the City of Eagan is
affected both positively and negatively by the airport. The City benefits by convenient access to
airport services while at the same time areas of the City are negatively affected by aircraft noise.
A significant change at MSP occurred in October 2005 when a new north -south runway
(Runway 17/35) opened, resulting in many areas of Eagan previously unaffected by noise now
being impacted by aircraft noise. The existing parallel runways continue to have noise effects
upon the northern portion of the City. Part of the City's challenge is to maximize the benefits of
its convenient location while minimizing the aircraft noise effects.
The major benefit of the City's proximity to the airport is convenient access for its residents and
businesses to the services offered by MSP. It is less than a 20 minute trip from most areas of
Eagan to MSP. Businesses such as Northwest Airlines, USPS Bulk Mail Facility and numerous
hotels decided to locate within Eagan in part due to the proximity to the airport
Aircraft noise is the negative aspect of being two -three miles from MSP. In 2004, MSP served
36.7 million passengers and accommodated over 541,000 landings and takeoffs. MSP ranks 9th
in North America for the number of travelers serviced. The airport boasts the eighth busiest
airfield in the world. MSP is expected to serve 55 million passengers annually by the year 2020,
thus creating a need for further airport expansion, according to the Metropolitan Airports
Commission (MAC).
As a result of the numerous over flights, substantial areas of Eagan are within a designated noise
exposure zone'. Aircraft noise is a nuisance to many people and the amount of noise in certain
areas affects how the land can be used and how buildings need to be constructed to minimize
negative impacts. For example, much of the northern half of Eagan falls within designated noise
zones and new single family homes, churches, schools and other noise sensitive uses are
discouraged from being built in this area. If these uses are built they must be constructed to
provide greater than average noise reducing walls, windows and doors.
GOALS AND POLICIES
GOALS
1. To minimize the establishment of noise sensitive uses in areas where noise impacts are
greatest.
2. To the extent possible, mitigate noise impacts in areas where noise sensitive uses currently
exist, or can be anticipated, in noise impact zones.
' Based on Metropolitan Council's 2007 MSP Noise Policy Zones
06/20/2006
3. To advocate airport -operating procedures that will minimize adverse impacts in Eagan's
noise sensitive areas, especially those areas that were established outside of areas where
operations and noise impacts were anticipated.
4. To implement an orderly transition from noise sensitive land uses to noise compatible ones
where appropriate, in consideration of all development factors for the area.
5. To minimize the establishment of physical structures that will interfere with aircraft
operations.
POLICIES
The City will generally discourage new residential development in areas most affected by
aircraft noise. This area is depicted by the current Metropolitan Council Noise Zones as
illustrated in Figure 5.1.
2. The City will consider in -fill residential development within the area described above on a
case by case basis. Where such in -fill development is permitted, it will only occur under
appropriate requirements respecting aircraft noise including sound attenuating construction
techniques and buyer notification of the noise environment.
3. The City of Eagan will enforce its Noise Attenuation Construction ordinance, at such time as
it is adopted, which applies to all noise -sensitive areas within the Metropolitan Council Noise
Zones.
4. Any additions, modifications or replacements of existing homes within the Noise Zones shall
use noise abatement designs and construction techniques to achieve an inside noise
attenuation level appropriate for its noise zone.
5. The City will encourage the maximization of noise mitigation programs for -the benefits of its
residents.
6. The City will designate the Metropolitan Council Noise Policy Contours on its zoning and
comprehensive guide plan maps to inform current and prospective property owners of the
presence of potential noise impacts and the existence of regulations and performance
standards for those areas. The designation of the contours on the comprehensive guide plan
and zoning maps shall constitute buyer notification of the noise environment by the City.
7. The City will continue its cooperative efforts with the Metropolitan Airports Commission,
the Pollution Control Agency and other governmental agencies to reduce adverse noise
impacts generated by air traffic.
8. The city will advocate for historic and prospective aircraft operating procedures that respect
the City's purposeful efforts to minimize noise sensitive uses in the Eagan -Mendota Heights
Corridor. The City will resist efforts by other agencies to introduce or modify operating
06/20/2006
procedures so as to increase adverse impacts in noise sensitive areas of Eagan outside of the
Corridor.
9. The City will continue to encourage noise compatible commercial -industrial uses in the
northern portion of the City where the noise compatible Corridor has been established. The
City will consider redevelopment of noise -sensitive residential uses to noise compatible uses
in the Corridor in situations where other planning factors support such action.
10. The City does not anticipate a strategy of major redevelopment of the residential areas of
south and west Eagan that now experience additional over -flights from the north -south
runway. This is due to the scale of residential development that has occurred in this area to
date and the presence of substantial areas of commercial and industrial land uses in the
northern portion of the City associated with historic air traffic patterns. The City will apply
appropriate performance standards to expansion or modification of uses, in -fill development
or redevelopment within the area.
11. The City will advocate for specific noise attenuation considerations for noise sensitive areas
in southwest Eagan, because neither the City nor its property owners could have anticipated
the over -flight impact from the new north -south runway.
12. The City will notify appropriate agencies of proposed construction or alterations that will
exceed height limitations in airport areas as specified in Federal or State law.
ECONOMIC BENEFITS
According to the 2006 Metropolitan Airports Commission's Strategic Plan, the Minneapolis -St.
Paul.Intemational Airport is both directly and indirectly responsible for over 150,000 jobs in the
region, $10.7 billion in annual business revenues, $5.9 billion in personal income, and $626
million in State and local taxes.
For the City of Eagan, the benefit of being located in close proximity to the airport has helped
the City support a healthy and diverse business community, from corporate headquarters to
distribution companies to hotels and restaurants. The airport is a tremendous marketing tool for
bringing in new businesses and retaining those that have made Eagan their home.
AIRPORT/AIRCRAFT IMACTS
LAND USE
Different types of land use have varying degrees of sensitivity to aircraft noise. For example,
commercial -industrial uses are more compatible with aircraft noise than noise -sensitive
residential, churches and schools. Noise sensitivity varies among residential uses. Single family
homes have more exposed. exterior walls and roof areas and rely more on the outdoor yard areas
than most multi -family housing. As such, single family homes are generally more affected by
aircraft noise than multi -family housing.
3
a�
06/20/2006
The northern portions of Eagan are particularly affected by aircraft noise (See Figure 5.1 for a
location of the proposed 2007 mitigated noise contours). To avoid additional conflicts the City
has guided most of this area for commercial -industrial development and discouraged
construction of new single family residential homes and most multi -family homes in noise
exposure areas.
In general, the Comprehensive Plan does not recommend construction of new single family
homes within the noise exposure areas, except on a case specific basis. Extraordinary sound
proofing should occur if new single family dwellings are constructed in noise exposure areas.
Construction of multi -family homes may occur within the noise zones in which such uses are
considered provisional or conditional, but they must be constructed to provide adequate sound
insulation to provide a quiet indoor environment and meet other standards outlined for such uses
in this guide and the regional guidelines. Where this is deemed appropriate, it can be
accomplished by meeting the Structure Performance Standards established by the Metropolitan
Council's Aviation Chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide, as well as by meeting
standards set forth in the City's future noise attenuation ordinance. For residential and
educational/medical land uses, interior sound levels may not exceed 45 dBA. An interior sound
level of 50 dBA is required for cultural, recreational, entertainment, office, commercial, and
retail service uses. Table 5.1 outlines the Metropolitan Council's land use compatibility
guidelines for development within noise exposure areas.
NOISE EXPOSURE AND NOISE MITIGATION
There are existing residential uses within noise exposure zones. Aircraft noise exposure is
measured and mapped by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). The noise exposure
zones and accompanying mitigation programs are subject to approval by the Federal Aviation
Administration.
Noise exposure is measured on an annualized average weighting of day -night noise levels
measured in decibels (Ldn). Around MSP, the significant noise exposure zones are mapped from
Ldn 75 (highest) to Ldn 60 (lowest). Homes within the proposed 2007 Ldn 65 Mitigated Noise
Contour are eligible for the residential sound insulation program offered by MAC. All currently
eligible homes in Eagan have been contacted for participation in the program, and have either
had the insulation modifications completed or declined to participate. All homes within the 60-64
Ldn DNL contours may be eligible for some mitigation should the FAA approve the 2007
proposed residential noise mitigation being recommended by the MAC. As of June 2006, the
City of Eagan remains in active litigation with the Cities of Minneapolis and Richfield against
the MAC regarding the proposed 2007 residential noise mitigation program for those homes that
are located within the 60-64 Ldn Noise Contours.
While the MAC has submitted the 2007 Part 150 Update, the FAA has not yet approved the
document. The FAA has approved the 2007 unmitigated noise contours; however, the mitigated
2007 noise contours, which show the homes that would be eligible for mitigation, have not yet
been approved. Depending on the outcome of the litigation, it is anticipated that the next Part 150
4
1 a
06/20/2006
Update, and corresponding update to the noise exposure map will begin at the earliest in 2007 to
reflect the proposed noise forecast for 2012.
Table: 5.1 Metropolitan Council Airport Land -use Compatibility Guidelines
Land Use Types/Noise Exposure Zones
Land Use
Compatibility New Development Infill -Reconstruction or
Guidelines Major Redevelopment Additions to Existing Structures
2 3 4 3 2 3 .. ___ 4
Residential
Single/Multiplex with INCO2 INCO INCO CONDCOND COND COND j COND
Individual Entrance
Multiplex/Apartment with
INCO
PROV
PROV
PROV
COND
PROV
PROV
PROV
Shared Entrance
Mobile Home
INCO
INCO
INCO
COND '
COND
COND
COND
COND
Educational and Medical
Schools, Churches,
INCO
INCO
INCO
PROV
COND
COND
COND
PROV
Hospitals, Nursing Homes
Cultural, Entertainment,
Recreational
Indoor
COND'
PROV
PROV
PROV
COND
PROV
PROV
PROV
Outdoor
COND
COND
COND
CNST
COND
COND
COND
CONST .
Office, Commercial, Retail
COND
PROV
PROV
CNST
PROV
PROV
PROV
CNST
Services
I
Transportation -Passenger
COND
PROV
PROV
CNST
COND
PROV
PROV
CNST
Facilities
Transient Lodging INCO PROV PROV PROV COND J PROV I PROV PROV
Other Medical, Health & COND PROV PROV CNST COND I PROV PROV CNST
Educational Services
Other Services
COND
PROV
PROV
CNST
COND
PROV
PROV
J CNST
(�
Industrial,Communication,
PROV
I CNST
CNST
CNST
CNST
CNST
CNST^
CNST
Utility
Source: Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Development Guide —Aviation, 12/96
2 INCO means Inconsistent
3 COND means Conditional
4 PROV means Provisional
5
)ao
06/20/2006
♦ Consistent: Land uses that are acceptable.
♦ Provisional: Land uses must comply with certain structured performance
standards to be acceptable according to MS 473.192 (Metropolitan
Area Aircraft Noise Attenuation Act).
♦ Conditional: Land uses that, in addition to meeting the structure performance
standards, may be identified as conditionally acceptable upon
review by the City Council. The City Council will review and
authorize conditional uses upon a finding that they comply with the
factors set forth in Table 5.2.
♦ Inconsistent: Land uses that are not acceptable even if acoustical treatment were
incorporated in the structure and outside uses were restricted.
5.2 Conditional Land Use Review Factors.
1. SI?ecific nature of the proposed use, including extent of associated outdoor activities.
d
2. Relationship of proposed use to their planning considerations, including adjacent land use activities,
consistency with overall comprehensive planning and relation to other metrol)olitan systems.
3 Frequency of exposure of proposed uses to aircraft overflight.
1
4. Location of proposed use relative to aircraft flight tracks and aircraft on -ground operating and
maintenance areas.
5. Location, site design and construction restrictions to be imposed on the proposed use by the
community with respect to reduction of exterior to interior noise transmissions, and shielding of
outdoor activities.
6. ! Method community will use to inform future occupants of proposed potential noise from aircraft
I operations.
7. Extent to which community restricts the building from having facilities for outdoor activities
associated with the use.
S. Distance of proposed use from existing or proposed runways, parallel taxiways, or engine run-up
areas.
6
Jaq
06/20/2006
AIRPORT SAFETY
Safety zones are established within the MSP Airport Zoning District to ensure an unobstructed
flight path for departing and arriving aircraft. The safety zones extend off the ends of each
runway and impose height and use restrictions on properties and structures within them. Due to
the distance between the runways and the municipal borders of Eagan the safety zones do not
have a significant effect upon height of proposed structures in Eagan. The main concern is that
structures within safety zones do not exceed 200 feet in height. The City of Eagan is required to
notify MNDOT of any proposed structure in excess of 200 feet outside of individual airport
zoning districts to control potential obstructions in the region's general airspace.
A section needs to be added to note the JAZB Overlay Area.
AIRPORT EXPANSION
A significant expansion of MSP Airport took place in 2005, which changed flight patterns and
noise exposure in Eagan. Runway 17/35, also known as the North-South Runway, became
operational in October 2005, and is anticipated to add 25% capacity to MSP.
The current runway configuration consists of two parallel runways (12-30 left and right), one
cross wind runway (4-22), and one north -south. runway (17-35). The two parallel runways are
oriented in a southeast -northwest direction and landings and takeoffs from/to the southeast are
generally over Eagan. The North-South Runway is located to the west of the parallel runways,
with both landing and takeoffs from/to the south. The location of Runway 17-35 in proximity to
the other runways allows for independent and simultaneous use of the north -south and the
parallel runways.
The flight departure tracks from the North-South Runway spread noise over much of the
southern half of the city, and the arrival operations off of Runway 17-35 concentrate significant
noise over those homes in Eagan that are located just east of Cedar Avenue, as that is the
location of the extended centerline for arrival operations. The City will continue to work with the
Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) to minimize the area affected by noise and to
establish additional noise mitigation measures.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Eagan Airport Relations Commission
The City of Eagan has an active Airport Relations Commission. The Commission is an
appointed advisory body of the Eagan City Council. The purpose of the Commission is to advise
and make recommendations to the City Council concerning aircraft noise and airport policy
issues that impact or have the potential to impact Eagan. As citizen volunteers, Commission
members provide valuable insight into public perceptions of these issues for the City Council,
City staff and community at large.
Currently the Eagan Airport Relations Commission is focusing on:
06/20/2006
1. Monitoring departure and arrival tracks of Runway 17-35 to minimize noise exposure
to residential neighborhoods.
2. Seeking a 95% or better rate of compliance within the Eagan/Mendota Heights
Corridor.
3. Efforts to improve the representation the City receives on the Metropolitan Airports
Commission (MAC).
4. Understanding the impacts of ground -level, low frequency noise on the
community.
5. Communications efforts to inform residents about the activities of the City to reduce
airport noise over the City of Eagan and provide avenues in which citizens can be heard
regarding concerns over airport noise.
6. Monitoring the progress of the litigation efforts against the MAC with regard to the
Part 150 Residential Noise Mitigation Program.
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport Noise Oversight Committee
The City of Eagan is one of six communities surrounding the airport that has a seat on the MSP
Noise Oversight Committee (NOC). The MAC established the NOC in August 2002. Its purpose
is to bring industry and community representatives together as a balanced forum to dialogue
about noise issues at the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport and to bring policy
recommendations to the MAC. The committee meets on a bimonthly basis. The NOC replaced
the group formerly known as the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC),
which was disbanded in 2000.
Metropolitan Council
The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning agency that has the legislative authority of
approving the MAC's Capital Improvements Plan budget. The Metropolitan Council's role in
the evaluation of noise is to promulgate guidelines for the compatible use and development of
land in communities surrounding the airport and approve individual airport long-term
comprehensive plans.
Other Agencies
A number of other State agencies work with the MAC in either a cooperative and/or regulatory
capacity. The Minnesota Department of Transportation is involved in all construction projects
that will impact the traveling public, including runway construction and roadway improvements.
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency works with MAC Environment Department on issues
such as noise and groundwater runoff. The Minnesota Environmental Quality Board has the
131
06/20/2006
final authority in approving Environmental Impact Statements and other environmental
documents related to the MSP.
9
13�
ITEM 2
MEMORANDUM
TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC)
FROM: Chad E. Leqve, Manager —Aviation Noise and Satellite Programs
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON RUNWAY 17190 -DEGREE DEPARTURE HEADING
DATE: September 6, 2006
At the July 19, 2006 NOC meeting Mr. Carl Rydeen, FAA MSP Tower Manager, addressed the
Committee regarding the technical considerations related to airspace use/design and
departures off Runway 17 at MSP in the context of the 190 -degree departure heading. Mr.
Rydeen informed the Committee that the 200 -degree heading test began on June 19, 2006 and
reported that it appears the 200 -degree heading will work and that FAA anticipates
implementation of the heading. However, given the minor 10 -degree shift from the 190 -degree
heading to the 200 -degree heading, Burnsville residents under the 190 -degree heading
departure track have reported minimal change with the use of the 200 -degree heading. As a
result, the City of Burnsville remains equally concerned with the 200 -degree heading and the
continued concentration of overflights over northeast Burnsville.
FAA's position at the July 19th NOC meeting was that a 200 -degree heading is the furthest
extent of the Runway 17 westerly departure heading fan that is available during southeast
operational flows at MSP. The NOC expressed concern over FAA's position and a hope that the
FAA and the City of Burnsville would work together to address the concerns of the residents
impacted by the departure heading. Burnsville City officials stated their intent to meet with FAA
officials hopefully to identify a workable resolution; however, the city continues to explore its
legal options.
At the August 9, 2006 MAC Finance Development and Environment Committee meeting, MAC
Commissioners heard testimony from Burnsville Mayor Elizabeth Kautz and State Senator
William Belanger. Following those comments, MAC Commissioner McKasy requested that MAC
staff continue to work with the City and the FAA to ensure that the concerns and input from the
City are considered in accordance with the applicable FAA regulations and environmental
documentation relative to Runway 17 departures.
On August 29, 2006 Mr. Tom Hansen, Burnsville Deputy City Manager, and MAC staff met with
Mr. Rydeen to discuss possible options for addressing Burnsville's concerns. MAC staff shared
the MAC's concerns with Mr. Rydeen. Mr. Rydeen extended an invitation to Mr. Hansen to
come and express the City's concerns at a future FAA tower supervisors meeting. Mr. Rydeen
also offered to address Burnsville residents on the operational issues.
FAA's position remains that these operations are in compliance with previous environmental
documentation, which include a departure heading fan that ranges from a 095 -degree heading
on the east side to a 285 -degree heading on the west side of Runway 17. The FAA has
determined that this departure fan provides FAA Air Traffic Control (ATC) the flexibility to utilize
the respective headings within the departure fan in 5 -degree increments as they determine
appropriate.
Mr. Rydeen will address MAC Commissioners at the September 6, 2006 Finance, Development
and Environment Committee meeting regarding the technical considerations associated with the
use of the 190/200 degree heading off Runway 17 at MSP.
l,-;3
At the September 20, 2006 NOC meeting staff will provide an update to Committee members
regarding this topic and discussions to date.
/34-
ITEM 5
MEMORANDUM
TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC)
FROM: Chad E. Leqve, Manager — Aviation Noise and Satellite Programs
SUBJECT: 2007 NOC WORK PLAN ELEMENTS
DATE: September 6, 2006
At the September 20, 2006 NOC meeting discussions will begin regarding possible elements of
the 2007 NOC Work Plan. Final member comments and ideas will be sought at the November
15, 2006 NOC meeting in an effort to finalize the 2007 NOC Work Plan.
MAC staff provides the following for consideration as possible 2007 NOC efforts:
Part 150 Implementation
• Updates on Part 150 Litigation and Associated Developments
• Develop Part 150 Program Mitigation Implementation Measures as Appropriate
MSP Noise Program Specific Efforts
• Review of Runway Use System Implementation
• Assessment of Runway 17/35 Operations
• Review Runway End Departure Turn Point Procedure Compliance on Runway 12L
• Review and Implementation of Modified Voluntary MSP Nighttime Operations
Agreement with Operators
• Review of Possible Aircraft Procedures at M SP to Reduce Noise
• Review Status of FAA Center of Excellence/PARTNER Initiatives
Continued Review of Public Input
• Continue to Review Input Received from the Public Input Meetings as Possible
Agenda Items
Please consider the above efforts in preparation for a preliminary 2007 NOC Work Plan
discussion at the September 20, 2006 NOC meeting. Final discussion and consideration of work
plan elements will occur at the November 15, 2006 NOC meeting when the 2007 NOC Work
Plan is finalized.
2 It is important to note that the Part 150 implementation elements are on-going efforts that could span multiple years.
135
Neig h borhood::,
Test Areas Combined
xer,l, 2004 -:Ma, y 24, 2005.
Number ofi Sales `V'
A nf-
t2-61,500. _J
November. 1, 2005 -May 24, 2006.
Number of Sales ., .
�-100—,
F-.
Avg. Salet Price
.
$316,564
Median Sales Price
$264,900
/3cp
Neighborhood:
Total City of Eagan
November -1,2004 -May 24, 2005
Number of Sales I
331
Aug Sales
t3-3--0,454
Median Sales Price
..... .... . . $285,000 2 . 8 . 5 ... 0 .. 0 .- 0
'Avg DOM
49
Median DOM
33
November 1, 2005 -May 24, 2006
Number of Sales
202
,Avg Sales_Pnce
$328,771
FMedian sales Price
$285,500
--Avg DOM..
60
Median DOW
54
Pre'pared by the Southern Twin Cities Assodiation of REALTORS for the City of Eagan.
Based on data from the RIVILS, Inc. and covers sold, single-family homes -June 6, 2006
137
Neighborhood:
Total City of Inver Grove Heights
D
'November 1, 2005 -May 24, 2006
Number of Sai.eS
205
$267.385
TMedian Sales Price
$212,000 F.
DOM,
69
139>
Neighborhood:
Cities of Mendota Heights, Mendota, & Lilydale I
November 1, 2005 -May 24, 2006
Nu 'ber of Sales
84
Avg, Sales Price.
.. ... .. .. ..
$455,455
FUledian Sales Price I
$405,000
Av'9 DOM
77
F
Median DOM
52
Prepared by the Southern Twin Cities Association of REALTORS for the City of Eagan.
Beksbd on data from the RIVILS, Inc. and covers sold, single-family homes — June 6, 2006
/3q