Loading...
04/11/2006 - Airport Relations CommissionAGENDA EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2006 7:00 P.M. I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD IV. OLD BUSINESS A. Communication Update B. MAC Monthly Reports — Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis/Technical Advisory Report/17-35 Departure Analysis Report V. NEW BUSINESS A. Consider Recommendation to. the City Council re: Part II of the Wyle Noise Study B. NOC Work Program / Prioritization of Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program Noise Mitigation Measures C. Joint Meeting with the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission VI. STAFF / COMMISSION UPDATE A. Correspondence to Eagan's Legislative Delegation re: MAC Representation B Airport Relations Commission 2006-2007 Work Plan B. Noise Oversight Committee / City of Apple Valley C. Thanks to Out -Going Commissioners VII. ROUNDTABLE VIII. ADJOURNMENT Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. City of Evan demo TO: CHAIR THORKILDSON AND THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION FROM: DIANNE MILLER, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE: MARCH 29, 2006 SUBJECT: AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING/TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2006 A regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission will be held on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Eagan City Council Chambers. In order that we have a quorum present, please contact Mary Swenson at 651-675-5005 if you are unable to attend this meeting.. I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA The agenda, as presented or modified, is in order for adoption by the Commission. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the February 13, 2006 Airport Relations Commission meeting are enclosed on pages -I— through T._ Minutes of the Joint Workshop with the Eagan City Council on Tuesday,, March 14 weri included on the April 4, 2006 City Councila enda for formal consideration. Those minutes are enclosed on pages 7 through 17 for the Commission's information. The February meeting minutes, as presented or modified, are in order for adoption by the Commission. III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD The Eagan City Council and its Commissions set aside up to ten minutes at the beginning of public meetings to permit visitors to address items of interest that are not scheduled on the regular agenda. Items that will take more than ten minutes or that require specific action can be scheduled for a future agenda. IV. OLD BUSINESS - A. Communication Update – At the February 13, 2006 Airport Relations Commission Workshop, it was the decision of the Commission to disband the three Communication Subcommittees that were put in place in preparation for the opening of the new runway. Rather, the Commission asked that a general "Communications Update" be included on each agenda should any of the Commissioners have recommendations or questions regarding airport communications efforts in the community. B. MAC Monthly Reports — Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis/Technical Advisory Report/17-35 Departure Analysis Report — Enclosed on pages JI_ through is the Febru y 2006 Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis. Enclosed on pages /�_ through is the February 2006 Technical Advisory Report. Enclosed on pages 55: through iil:: is the February 2006 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report. The February reports are the most current reports available on the MAC website. It is the practice of the Commission to review the reports and discuss any significant deviations that may have occurred or any other noteworthy occurrences as reported in the analysis. V. NEW BUSINESS A. Consider Recommendation to the City Council regarding Part II of the Wyle Noise Study — In June of 2005, in preparation for the opening of the new runway, at the recommendation of the ARC, the Eagan City Council retained the consulting firm of Wyle Laboratories to conduct a noise study to measure noise levels in the City of Eagan in advance of the opening of Runway 17-35. At the completion of the study, it was noted by both the Commission and the City Council that a decision should be made in the spring of 2006 to determine whether a follow-up study should be conducted in June of 2006 to measure the noise levels in the community following the opening and operation of Runway 17-35. At this time, it is suggested that the Commission discuss the merits of conducting Part II of the noise study in June of 2006 in order to make a recommendation to the City Council on whether to proceed. B. NOC Work Program / Prioritization of Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program Noise Mitigation Measures — Enclosed on pages through is a memo that was distributed at the March 15, 2006 Noise Oversight Committee meeting regarding the prioritization of the Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program Noise Mitigation Measures. This item is included for the Commission's review should they have any questions or comments pertaining to the evaluation. The memo also provides some historical background as to the recommendations regarding departure and arrival track locations for Runway 17-35. The Noise Compatibility Program has yet to be approved by the FAA, as it will be considered with the entire Part 150 document waiting for FAA approval. C. Joint Meeting with the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission — At the request of the City of Mendota Heights, a joint meeting of the Eagan and Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commissions has been scheduled for Tuesday, May 9, 2006. Recognizing that the Eagan ARC will have new members joining in May, it is proposed that the Eagan Airport Relations Commission meet from 7:00 to 7:30 p.m. in order to take care of Organizational Business items and any other business that needs to be addressed. The Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission would then arrive to Eagan City Hall for a joint meeting at 7:30 p.m. At this time, the Commission is welcome to discuss the upcoming joint meeting and any topics the Commission believes would be beneficial for discussion items. VI. STAFF / COMMISSION UPDATE A. Correspondence to Eagan's Legislative Delegation re: MAC Representation — Enclosed on pages ZZ through ][!J� is a copy of the letter that was sent to all members of Eagan's legislative delegation as well as Governor Pawlenty regarding the current representation that the City of Eagan receives on the Metropolitan Airports Commission. This letter was forwarded to the delegation at the direction of the City Council and Airport Relations Commission at the joint meeting on March 14, 2006. As of March 29, no responses have been received from any members of the legislative delegation. B. Air ort Relations Commission 2006-2007 Work Plan — Enclosed on pages 0 V through is the 2006-2007 Airport Relations Commission Work Plan as approved by the City Council at the March 14, 2006 Special City Council Workshop. The Work Plan is included for the Commission members' reference. Should any Commissioners have items they would like to address tonight, they are welcome to bring them forward; otherwise, the items on the Work Plan will be included in upcoming ARC meetings. C. Noise Oversight Committee / City of Apple Valley - At the March 15; 2006 Noise Oversight Committee, the Committee unanimously approved the City of Apple Valley joining the at -large communities on the Noise Oversight Committee. Additionally, a bylaw change was approved that provides for a single representative of the at -large cities to serve a 2 -year term. This change was suggested in order to increase continuity amongst the at -large seat. D. Thanks to Out -Going Commissioners - A special thanks to Commissioners Nierengarten, Krahn, and Aljets for their service on the Airports Relations Commission over the past 3 years. Also, thank you to Commissioner Prentice, who has served a one-year alternative term. Two of the four Commissioners have re-applied to continue service on the Airport Relations Commission. Any re -appointments and new members will begin their terms on the Airport Relations Commission at the May 9, 2006 ARC meeting. VII. ROUNDTABLE Per the request of the Commission, this agenda item has been added -so that Commissioners have the opportunity to ask questions or make requests for future agenda items. VIII. ADJOURNMENT It is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to adjourn each meeting by 8:30 p.m. Should the Commission need additional time, it is the Commission's practice to request a formal vote to extend the meeting time. Assistant to the City Administrator 13 MEETING NOTES WORKSHOP OF THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 2006 Conference Room 1A & 1B Present: Curtis Aljets, Jason Bonnett, Tammy Mencel, Steve Nierengarten, Jack Prentice and Charles Thorkildson. Also present: Dianne Miller, Assistant to the City Administrator Absent: Valerie Dosland, Daniel Flanagan, Dean Haehnel and Nathan Krahn GOALS - 1. Receive Better Representation on the MAC by Pursuing Legislation to Change Eagan's Current Representation o Preference: Eagan receives permanent representation on the MAC in the same way Minneapolis and St. Paul currently have seats. o 2"a Choice: Eagan joins with the other communities in the 65 DA contour (who do not currently have sole representation) to secure an at -large seat that would jointly represent the cities of Eagan, Bloomington, Richfield, and Mendota Heights. Work Plan to Achieve Goal: • Send correspondence to Eagan Legislative delegation to outline the changes the City is looking for with regard to MAC representation. Seek their opinions on the matter, and depending upon the response, inquire as to whether one of Eagan's State representatives or senators will introduce a bill to seek the change. • In late 2006, when MAC reappointments are being considered, participate in local cable show to discuss the issue of MAC representation and note Legislative support within Eagan. 2. Seek a New District H Representative on the MAC (in the event that the City is not successful in securing a seat of its own or an at -large seat) o Promote or recommend a resident or business person in the community who would represent the interests of the City (e.g. noise concerns, promoting the transportation/aviation businesses in the community, etc.). Must consider political party affiliation depending on who wins the Gubernatorial race iri November. 2006 Goals/Work Plan Meeting February 13, 2006 Page 2 Work Plan to Achieve Goal: • Brainstorm list of possible replacements for Commissioner McKasy in early 2007. • Find out whether Commissioner McKasy is seeking another term on the MAC. 3. Seek an Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Compliance Percentage of 95% or Greater in 2006. Work Plan to Achieve Goal: • Monitor Corridor deviation monthly. • Approach the FAA when compliance drops under 95% to request an explanation of the deviations. • Maintain communications with the MAC and FAA so they are aware of the Commission's focus on Corridor deviations. Other ARC Projects/Initiatives for 2006 • Provide the City Council with a summary of the ARC goals • Disband Communication Subcommittees o In light of the runway opening and the end to the City's significant pre -runway communications efforts, the ARC requested that a "Communication Update" be placed on the ARC's monthly agenda so that the Commission as a whole can address communication issues. • 2008 Comprehensive Guide Plan Update—ARC to participate in updating of the Aviations Section Noise Study Part H o ARC to discuss whether to conduct Phase II of the Wyle Noise Study in March o Make recommendation to the City Council in April on whether to pursue Phase II of the Study. . o If Council chooses to approve Phase H of the Noise Study, study should be conducted in June, 2006 to be consistent with the study time period in 2005. Property Value Study/Survey of Residents Moving Out of Eagan o Approach the Southern Twin Cities Association of Realtors (STCAR) to see if they are interested in doing a study on: 1.)How have home sale rates in areas most impacted by the new runway been impacted (number of homes on market)?; 2.) How have homes sold in these areas appreciated/depreciated in value since October 27, 2005?; and, 3.) Of the residents moving out of Eagan, how much of a factor was airport noise in their decision to move? ("exit survey")? 5 2006 Goals/Work Plan Meeting February 13, 2006 Page 3 o If the STCAR is not interested in doing such a study, ask for their recommendation on a college or university who may best be able to assist the City. • Runway Use o Summer 2006: Review use on each of the runways to determine if runway usage predictions in the 2007 proposed Part 150 Plan are accurate. o Summer 2006: Review the use of the individual flight tracks off of Runway 17/35 to determine if the usage matches with the data used to prepare the proposed 2007 Part 150 Plan. MAC Lawsuit o Continue to monitor status of the City's lawsuit against the MAC regarding the noise mitigation program proposed in the 60-64 DNL contours. WIN (kb( c�►�Std�ratron MINUTES -A NJ UD (W1\0 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING M15) MARCH 14, 2006 5:30 P.M. EAGAN ROOM — EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER City Councilmembers present: Mayor Geagan, Councilmembers Carlson, Fields, and Maguire. Councilmember Tilley was out of town attending the National League of Cities Conference - City staff present: City Administrator Hedges, Assistant to the City Administrator Miller, Director of Administrative Services VanOverbeke, Director of Community Development Hohenstein, Administrative Intern Walz, Public Works Director Colbert, Superintendent of Streets Struve, City Planner Ridley, Deputy Police Chief McDonald, and Director of Communications Garrison. City Attorney Mike Dougherty was also present. I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION Mayor Geagan called the meeting to order. Councilmember Fields moved; Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to adopt the agenda. Aye: 3; Nay: 0 (Councilmember Carlson not yet present.) H. SIGN CODE / WINDOW SIGNS City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that the Eagan City Code establishes standards under which signs are regulated within the City of Eagan. Hedges added that in 2005, the City Council directed the Advisory Planning Commission and staff to study possible changes in the regulation of temporary signs and additional regulation for window signage. At that time, Hedges added that information about the proposed changes were distributed by the Chamber to its members. It was noted that an article about the changes was also included the Eagan Business News newsletter, and a press release was provided to the local media to highlight the changes in the regulation of temporary signs and additional regulation for window signage. Hedges noted that the code amendment was adopted in the summer of 2005. Hedges added that since the changes to the sign code have gone into affect, the City and the Chamber have received a number of questions and concerns regarding the implementation of the new regulations for window signage and, therefore, due to these concerns, members of the City Council directed that a discussion item be placed on tonight's agenda. Ruthie Batulis, President of the Northern Dakota County Chambers of Commerce, as well as John Curlee of Curlee State Farm, and. Buzz Anderson, President of Minnesota Retailers Association, addressed the City Council with their concerns regarding the window signage changes. Ms. Batulis made a request of the City Council to consider placing a moratorium on the sign code changes in order to allow for the formation of a task force to further discuss the proposed changes to the sign code, particularly with regard to window signage. The three representatives that address W the City Council also noted the excessive burden that the code changes have placed on Eagan businesses. The City Council discussed the concerns voiced by the Chamber of Commerce and business community. Mayor Geagan also recognized many business owners and representatives in the audience. Councilmember Carlson arrived at 5:40 p.m. Following Council discussion, Mayor Geagan moved; Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to enact a moratorium on the sign code amendment for a period of 60 days and establish a task force to include two Councilmembers (Councilmembers Fields and Maguire), two members of the Advisory Planning Commission, Chamber President Batulis, and four diverse business representatives within the City of Eagan. The recommendations of the task force are to be brought back within 60 days. Aye: 4; Nay: 0 The City Council recessed from 6:10 to 6:20 p.m. The City Council workshop reconvened at 6:20 p.m. I11. BROADBAND OVERVIEW City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that in February 2004 the Eagan City Council gave direction to form the first Technology Task Force and began examining what Eagan's citywide Internet connectivity goals could or should be. Hedges added that the 2006 priorities for the Technology Working Group include reporting back later this spring on recommendations for the highest and best use for an 11.5 mile conduit route that Eagan owns, determining recommendations regarding wireless needs, and determining how to attract world class Internet speeds to Eagan. Lastly, Hedges added that in November of 2005, the City Council approved hiring the consulting firm of Dynamic City to provide the City and the working group with the specific market and engineering analysis regarding best use options for the conduit and also to supply expertise about fiber options that could provide Eagan world class Internet speeds. Communications Director Garrison introduced three consultants representing Dynamic City. Keith Wilson, CEO of Dynamic City, provided a presentation to the City Council on world class broadband. Following Mr. Wilson's presentation, the City Council discussed broadband and Internet needs within the City of Eagan. Communications Director Garrison noted that the consultants and the Technology Working Group will be coming back to the City Council with options on how the 11.5 miles of conduit can be used within the City of Eagan. Mayor Geagan thanked NDC Chamber President Ruthie Batulis for her involvement in the broadband discussions. 0 IV. WINTER PARKING BAN ORDINANCE City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that at the Council's Listening Session on January 17, the City Council received a request from. several property owners on Eagle Crest Drive to change the City's current winter parking ban ordinance to rectify a concern they have with a neighbor's vehicle frequently parked in front of their home. At that time, the Council referred the matter to the Public Works Committee for further review. Hedges added that on February 13, the Public Works Committee met with the Petitioners and reviewed the substantial documentation provided by the impacted homeowners, the current City ordinances, and parking bans of several other communities. Public Works Director Colbert, Superintendent of Streets Struve, and Deputy Chief McDonald provided overviews of the various options available to the City with regard to snow removal and control of on -street parking year-round. Councilmember Maguire highlighted the discussion that the Public Works Committee had on the issue. Deputy Chief McDonald provided an overview of how other cities enforce winter parking ordinances. The City Council discussed the concerns of the residents on Eagle Crest Drive as well as the City's overall enforcement of the winter parking ban ordinance. An Eagan resident addressed the City Council regarding the issues that he and his wife have with regard to cars parking in their neighborhood during the winter. Upon further Council discussion, Councilmember Fields moved; Councilmember Maguire made a motion to deny a request to change the City's winter parking ban ordinance and noted that if the residents on Eagle Crest Drive approach the City with solidarity on a parking proposal via a petition process, then the City Council will consider such a petition. Aye: 4; Nay: 0 V. ADOPT -A -STREET PROGRAM City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that the City of Eagan currently does not have a formal program that allows citizens or business groups to provide litter control and general community cleanup in an organized fashion along our local streets. Director of Public Works Colbert provided a proposal to the Council for their consideration of adopting such an "Adopt -A -Street" Program for the City of Eagan. The City Council discussed the proposed program and the cost associated with implementing it. Councilmember Fields moved; Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to implement the Adopt -A -Street Program in the City of Eagan, provided that signs placed on the adopted streets be optional and, if it is the desire of the group and/or individual to have their name added to a sign; the sign must be purchased by the group and/or individual. Aye: 4; Nay: 0 The City Council briefly discussed the most recent snow removal process following over 10 inches of snow that fell this week. Mayor Geagan complemented the City staff for their prompt work on snow removal. V1. 2006 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that in keeping with the City Council's past practice, a list of 2006 legislative priorities has been developed for the Council's consideration. Hedges noted that the priorities included a list of items in which the Council has taken a formal position. Hedges also added that the priorities presented do not duplicate the efforts made by the three lobbying organizations to which the City of Eagan belongs. The. City Council discussed the legislative priorities, including proposed legislation regarding eminent domain. Mayor Geagan thanked Councilmember Carlson for testifying last week with concerns regarding the eminent domain bill. Hedges noted the potential contractual implications within existing TIF districts should such legislation move forward. The Council noted that included in the priorities should be a request that a grandfather clause be added for TIF districts already established through the State Auditors Office. The City Council directed that a letter be sent to the City's legislative delegation with the 2006 legislative priorities. The Council also directed that in future years, a meeting be established with the legislative delegation in advance of the session beginning. The Council also requested that the legislative priorities be copied to the media. VII. JOINT MEETING WITH THE AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that it is the City Council's practice to meet with its Advisory Commissions at least once a year. City Administrator Hedges introduced ARC Chair Chuck Thorkildson, who summarized the proposed 2006/2007 goals and work plan for the ARC. The City Council and the ARC discussed the proposed work plan items, including a realtor/resident survey to gauge the impact of airport noise on the community. The City Council took a short recess from 7:35 to 7:45 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 7:45 p.m. The City Council and the ARC discussed the current representation the City of Eagan receives on the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). The City Council and members of the ARC noted the impact the airport has on Eagan and thus the need for additional representation on the MAC. The Council and ARC discussed the merits of the City of Eagan receiving a seat on the MAC, as well as the possibility of Eagan joining,with other communities within the 65 DNL noise /0 contours to lobby for one of the at -large seats on the MAC that is currently assigned to an out -state representative. The City Council concurred with sending correspondence to the City's legislative delegation regarding representation on the MAC, and suggested that it be noted that the MAC districts need to be explored for possible redistricting in the near future to better represent population distribution and impact of MSP Airport. Councilmember Carlson suggested that a survey be included in the Eagan Welcome Packet regarding how airport noise impacted a resident's decision to purchase a home. Mayor Geagan thanked the Airport Relations Commission for their work this past year in preparation of the opening of the new runway. VIII. OTHER BUSINESS The City Council and City Administrator Hedges briefly discussed the need to schedule a workshop and Advisory Commission applicant interviews in the month of April. The City Council agreed that Commission interviews will take place on April 25, with appointments being made on May 2, 2006. At the request of Councilmember Carlson, the City Council agreed that a letter should be sent to all businesses that are present at the workshop tonight regarding their concerns with the changes to the sign code. It was noted that the letter should include a brief summary of the communications process that was in place when the ordinance was drafted as well as a summary of the moratorium and task force that was established at tonight's meeting. The Council also suggested that when the task force members are appointed, that their names be included on the City's website. The City Council also requested that the list of communities surveyed with regard to window signage ordinances be expanded and also that Eagan be included on the survey, IX. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Fields moved; Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to adjourn at 8:25 p.m. Aye: 4; Nay: 0 February 2006 Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure {Corridor Analysis �J e 4 ppp FRS.✓ � + � f = -. • � d f r e wV 4 .e �I 1f5 H� C 'x Jw^ Metropolitan Airports Commission 1773 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in February 2006 1660 (93.6%) of those Operations Remained in the Corridor 1773 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure 1660 (93.6%) Total 12L & 12R Carrier . Operations Departure Operations in the Corridor Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate In -Corridor 02/01/2006 00:00:00 - 03/01/2006 00:00:00 1660 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 859 (51.7%), Right = 801 (48.3%) w svoo - d LL 5000 .... .... .. .... ... ; ... . O; O O Q.. 4000 ....... ........O - O .. o........ ..... O :... . m 0 Lu 3000-..... . ... 0 .M2000 ­ 1000 a° -20001000 ..... ... 0 a o -2 -1 0 1 2 Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) -f- Arrival O Departure 0 Overflights Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis (15 Page 1 Metropolitan Airports Commission 39 (2.2%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were North of the 090° Corridor Boundary During February 2006 - x�f 4 ! _N I' .. ! tir t xx • Ttib yr y re �i — fif <q x—b� �:, �'.•. _ O � O FSI• � f: ,�:1.t ? �'SI �� { J f aan�y} f ,i Fes., f�/ �C''-� �� �Vi�\-.dr•d_•-R� 4. I,�",f�`� '{ s^'. 5 y. t rlv t N t. i'y irc — �R .. i � n. � ��,la „�, ���� a � Yt� �� � � -� ice" � � • ft. a j �rk"..� � f Kfi �irT; i J �� � y-T�` 41t' � }•v� ! � � ♦' � -7 1 l� � '1 to -- 2 mill Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate North -Corridor 02/01/2006 00:00:00 - 03/01/2006 00:00:00 39 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1 (2.6%), Right = 38 (97.4°/x) .: 6000 d m 5000 0 a 4000 _d UJ 3000 0 CL 2000 Q > 1000 0 r Q 0 F.......................... _. ....... ,....... ...........l -2 -1 0 1 2 (Runway End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (Corridor End) — Arrival ' Departure Overflight Page 2 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis 14 U Metropolitan Airports Commission 74 (4.2%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were South of the Corridor (South of 30L Localizer) During February 2006 ILL i,�.�i$ mRpp q la7 �[40 5.'rFF TIP" a .. u.`�,.';3'6'� es:�Mlnx�.�lsusc.i•ass:I:Se,�tas„• �� � �! `�s -_ �_, e a :41.06Z EFIN r.6 :�� raw �r• 'y ■ PUN i m Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South -Corridor 02/01/2006 00:00:00 - 03101/2006 00:00:00 74 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 46 (62.2%), Right = 28 (37.8%) �. 6000 d CD 5000 ................. _. ...;.. 0 a 4000............. .. ......... d Lu3000 4.............0 .:..... o ............:.... .............:......... .. O; a 2000 o ooc °' O ........ . ........... . o o 0 l000 ......... ....o.:..........aca...:.0 .. b. ..�......... a n -2 -1 0 1 2 (Corridor End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY Mid -Point) + Arrival O Departure ❑ Overflight` Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Page 3 15- Metropolitan Airports Commission 4 (0.2%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 5° South of the Corridor (50 South of 30L Localizer) During February 2006 Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South_Corridor_5deg 02/01/2006 00:00:00 - 03/01/2006 00:00:00 4 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 4 (100.0%), Right = 0 (0.0%) = 6000 Q m c5000 ..... ................. 0 a4000 ..... ............... ................ ................. m Lu3000 ............. . .......; .. .............. c. 2000 ........ 09 .................................. . ................. 1000 .......... .. . ... . ....................... .. ................ 0 a0 _.W .. -2 -1 0 1 2 (Corridor End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY Mid -Point) Arrival ? Departure El Qverflightl ■a:rmm rrnrr�rarns�n� � i i® Page 4 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis 144 L' Metropolitan Airports Commission Top 15 Runway 12L and 12R Departure Destinations for February 2006 DTIV Detroit 10,50 51 2.9% ORD Chicago - O'Hare 124.0 51 2.9% ATL Atlanta1.49 0 34 19% CLE - Cleveland ' 10:9° 321:8% o EWR Newark 1.060 30 1:7%. MKE Milwaukee 1140:25 1.49/6: SLG Salt Lake City2520j _ 23 1.3% .DEN Denver 2.370 :: 22 . 1.2% LAS, Las Vegas:.: 243 o _ 22 1.2% MMChicago -Midway 0 .. 124 22 SEA Seattle2:78°.: 22 1:2% LGA. New York.- La Guardia 105° 21 1.2% YYZ Toronto.0.950 21 1,.2% LAX Los:Angeles 2380_ 20 1A JFK New. York - 7FK 1 pg Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis 17 Page 5 February 2006 Technical Advisor's Report Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport I� C Table of Contents for February 2006 Complaint Summary Noise Complaint Map FAA Available Time for Runway Usage _ MSP All Operations Runway Usage _. MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's by Type. MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's Stage Mix Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map__ Minutes Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events Minutes Above dB Threshold for Departure Related Noise Events Arrival Related Noise Events Departure Related Noise Events _ MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events Aircraft Ldn dBA_ A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11-14 15 16 17 18 19 20-32 33-35 MSP Complaints by City February 2006 City M Arrival De arture Other Number ofNl Complaints Number of Complainants % of Total Complaints APPLE VALLEY 116 692 16 137 4 172 1137 135 26.7`-,'% BLOOMINGTON 26 4 166 .51 13 9 269 26 6.340 BURNSVILLE 5 29 89 431 4 2 560 37 13.1% EAGAN 34 405 II 111 i + 397 1 192 1140 I44 26.9% EDINA U 0 5 20 0 9 34 l 0.8% FARMINGTON 0 18 0 0 0 0 18 1 0.4% GOLDEN VALLEY 0 (1 0 2 (1 0 2 1 0.0% INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 1 g 4 6 0 0 19 2 0.4°0 LAK.EVILLE 4 136 1 16 0 15 172 17 4.0% NTENDOTA HEIGHTS 0 0 8 158 0 0 166 4 3,9% MINNEAPOLIS 8 14 46 1.74 1 4 247 49 5.8% MINNETONKA 9 D 4 U U 0 13 2 0.3% PRIOR LAKE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0.0% RICHFIELD 1 0 392 3 2 8 406 12 9.5% ROSEMOUNT 0 2 1 1 0 0 4 3 0.1% SAINT LOUIS PARK 0 59 (I 0 0 0 59 1. 1.4% SAINT PAUL 0 0 0 8 0 1 9 4 0.20/0 SAVAGE 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0.0010 SOUTH SAINT PAUL U 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0.0410 Total 1571 12:1. 251 437 4259 445 100.0% Nature of MSP Complaints Complaint Airport Total' Early/Late 236 718 Engine Run-up 2 52 Excessive Noise 1060 3081 Frequency 213 1814 Ground Noise 188 212 Helicopter 4 5 Low Flying 85 1706 Structural Disturbance 32 285 Other 15 134 Total 9942 Note. Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints filed via the Intemet. Sum of % Total of Complaints may not equal 100% due to rounding. •As of May 2005, the MSP Complaints by City report includes multiple complaint descriptors per individual complaint. Therefore, the number of complaint descriptors may be more than the number of Time of Da Airport Time I Total 4259 0000 - M591 67 161 0600-0659 37 138 0700- 1159 256 731. 1200- 1559 158 1 414 1600- 1959 249 977 2000-21.59 137 430 2200-2259 109 202 2300-2359 61 132 Total 4259 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program ab Complaints by Ar ort Airport Total M:SP 4259 Airlake 0 Anoka 8 Crystal 0 Flvina Cloud 16 Lake Elmo 0 St. Paul 9 Misc. 0 Total 4292 NNW. Ax. im ion Noi,;e *oni ltt,+ for -1.14 lam lt 104-4 f ! .. i,' ��.ftl i c ;1 f ' °. i t "—alp. •t::l I r.sl r 4,.''f . iJ .�� i i �•� '� r--•���1�.�.-�� 1 � tt r�-A'�IRtl 11S l 1 i�-tl`�.1 ' v id d'I Mop S Slot ,�,. ``' v"'" ,� r i � e,��� Vit. •` .` "s" � '� 11 , � r � +�£'�111 �*, t� +o, �cr� ak 1"ro i� i :" � • !3 $ ��+" �±'� \ . Numbor of Complaints per Addross 1-6 s 20-33 .s R 'x` 6 1 06461 +t 2 A Product o'the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Available Time for Runway Use February 2006 (Source: FAA Runway Use Logs) All Hours ; i ".0'/P 0.0%P .0%. fJ - 55.4% 17.0% 34_2% 13.9%,. MSFT Runway Use Percentoge Diagram FAA Average Dailv Count z5.9°r° E d A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Progra 3 February 2005 February 2006 Air Carrier 963 814 Commuter 435 381 General Aviation 86 95 Military _ 7 _ _ j 7 Tota1 1491 1297 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Progra 3 All Operations Runway Use Report February 2006 i 38.5% 9.3% .0% :ori° �c el000" 32. t °/o 7.9% s3 Q.0"% /44.3% 47.6.°0 3'/0,. MSP Runway Use Percentage Diagram ii R. WY Arrival/ De arture Ove i W Area Count . O erations Percent Last Year Count O erations. Last Year Percent - 4 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No, Richfield 1667 9.3% 3045 15.0% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 1716 9.6% 3016 14.8% 1.7 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0.0% N/A 0.0% 22 Arr St. Paul,,Hinhland Park 0 0.0% 3 0.0% 30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 5635 3.1.5% 7198 35.4% 30R Arr E an/Mendota HeiLhts 5744 32.1% 7081 34.8% 35 Arr Bloominrton/E gan 31.52 17.6% N/A 0.0% Total Arrivals 17914 20344 4 Dep St. Paulffl hland Park 0 0.0% 10 0.0% 12L Dep Eaggan/Mendota Heights 1409 7.9% 2952 14.7% 12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 772 1 4.3%° 3,060 15.2% 17 Dep Bloomin ton/Eaaan 1473 8.3% N/A 0.0% 22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington, 0 0.0% 105 0.5% 30L De) So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 6852 38.5% 6795 33.8% 30.R Dep So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 7299 41.0% 7189 35.8% 35 Dep So. Minne• olis 0 0.0% N/A 0.00/,0 Total Departures 17805 1 20111 Total O erations 35719 140455 Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. 4 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program a..3 Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report February 2006 0.0% 0.0% .0% 9.7% 0.0% a 40,0% 1� 9.8% 31.3%° 7.6% "- 2.0°I° 0.0% 4.4%° m 0:0% 17.9% i 8.3% jj. d MSP Runway Use Percgi fLge Diagram RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count _Operations .; Last Year Percent 4 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomi-tiLton 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 1326 9.0% 2452 14.6% 12R Arr So. 1vEnnea olis/No. Richfield 1444 9.8%0. 2660 15.8% 17 Arr So. Minnea . olis 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 22 Arr St. Paul/Hi ihland Park 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 30L AiT Eagan/Mendota Hei rhts 4733 32.0% 5957 35.5% 30R Arr. Eagan/Mendota Heights 4636 31.3% 5730 34.1% 35 Arr Bloomington/Ea an 2653 179% N/A 0.0% Total Arrivals 14792 1 16800 4 Dep St. Paul/HiLhland Park 0 0.0% 6 0.0% 12L DeL3 Eagan/Mendota Heights 1122 7.6% 2419 14.6% 12R De) Eagan/Mendota Heights 651 4.4% 2645 15.9% 17 Dep Bloomin .ton/Eagan 1.227 8.3% N/A 0.0% 22 De. So. Richfield:Bloomington 0 0.0% 15 0.1% 30L Dep So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 5906 40.0% 5778 34.7% 30R De So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 5854 39.7% 5773 34.7% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0.0% N/A 0.0% Total Departures 14760 16636 Total Operations 29552 1 33436 Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 1 DD°/ due to rounding. A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Z4 5 0 February 2006 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition j F e_ TAR Part 36 Take - OffNoise Leve! aircraft Description S e Count Percent B742 _ 110.0 Bocine 747-200 3 2 0.0% B741 109.4 Boeing 747-100 3 0 0.0% B743 DC:SQ DCIO 105.5- 105.5 103.0 Bocin 747-300 McDonnell Douglas DC8-500/600 McDonnell Douglas DC10 3 2 3 0 310 0.0% 0.0% 1..0% B72Q B744 102.4 101.6 - Boeing 727-200 ,- - -- --� - Boei:n 747400 - 2_ 3 _.-. 0 _-.._ 65 0.0%._ 0.20/0 I)C'SQ 100.5 McDonnell Douglas DC8 (Modified S . 3) 3 64 0.2% L1.01 99.3 I.ock.heed I. 1.011. 3 0 O.fi% I)C9Q 98.1 McDonnell Douglas DC9 2 0 0.0% B73t 1 97.7 Boeing 737-200 2 0 0.0% BA11 97.0 British Aerospace BA 1-11 (Modified Str. 3) 3 0 0.0% A340 96.2 Airbus Industries A340 3 0 O.O°.o MD11 95.8 McDonnell Douglas MD 11 3 2 0.0% B767 95.7 Boein e 767-200/300 3 2 0.0% A330 95.6 Airbus Industries A330 3 56 0.2% B72Q 94.5 Boeing 727 (Modified S!& 3) 3 579 _ 2.0% DC8Q 94.5 McDonnell Douglas DC8-700 3 0 0.0% B777 94.3 Boein& 777 3 0 0.0% A300 94.0 Airbus Industries A30034-600 3 134 0.5% A310 92.9 Airbus Industries A310 3 35 0.1% F28 92.9 Fokker 28 2 0 0.0% B73Q 92.1 Boeing. 737 Modified Sty. 3) 3 63 0.2°/g MD80 91.5 McDonnell Dolmas lMD-80 3 605 1 2.0% B757 91.4 Boeing 757-200/300 3 3033 10.3% DC9Q_ 91.0 McDonnell Douglas DC9 (Modified Ste. 3) 3 4250 14.4% A321 89.8 Airbus Industries A321 3 0 0.0% B734 88.9 Boeing 737-400 3 4 0.0"/° A320 87.8 Airbus Industries A320 3 4028 13.6% B735 87.7 Boei m 737-500 3 510 1.7% B738 87.7 Boeing 737-800 3 1575 5.3% A318 87.5 Airbus Industries A318 3 42 0.1% A319 87.5 Airbus Industries A319 3 1 3674 12.4% B733 87.5 Boeing.737-300 3 1 671 2.3% 8737 87.5 Boein 737-700 3 32 0.1% RJ85 84.9 British Aerospace 146 3 1470 5.0% B712 83.0 Boeing 717-200 3 713 1 2.4% El 70 82.7 Embraer 170 3 170 0.6% EJ45 81.8 Ennbraer 145 3 945 3.2% F100 81.8 Fokker 100 3 0 0.0% C':U 79.8 Canadair Regional Jet 3 6501 22.0% E135 77.9 British Aerospace 135 3 17 0.1% 3328 I 76.5 Fairchild Domier 328 3 0 0.0% Totals 29552 Note: Sum of fleet mix % may not soual 1000/6 due to rounding. Count Current Percent Last Years Percent Stage II 0 0.0% 0.0% Stage III 4956 16.8% 20.9% Stage III Manufactured _ 24596 83.2% o 79.1% Total Stage I]] _. _ 29552 Note. Stage III represent aircraft modified to meet all stage III criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This Includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. -The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented per aircraft type during take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). •EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one-tenth of tone -corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A -weighted decibels. A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program a'5�_ Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report February 2006 , 0.0% 0.0% .0% 22% 0.0% . 3.2!c ° .,.......-.-�-_.':.�• - 6.9% 2'6-7% 6.9% 2.8% -- 0.0% 0.3% .2% MSP Runway Use Percentage Diagram RWY Arrival/ Departure Overfligbt Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Operations Percent 4 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12L Air So. Minna olisrNo. Richfield 37 3.2% 76 ' 6.8% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis,/No. Richfield 79 6.9% 210 18.9% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0.0% N/A 0.0% 22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 30L Arr Ea-ran/Mendota Heights 718 62.8% 563 50.7% 3OR Arr Ea an/Mendota Heights 305 26.7% 262 23.6% 35 Arr Bloominaton/E man 4 0.3% N/A 0.0% Total Arrivals 1143 1111 4 Dep St. Paul/Hi=daland Park 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12L Dep_Eagan/Mendota Hei lits 42 6.9% 95 15.5% 12R Del) Eanan%Mendota Heights 58 9.6% 121 19.7% 17 Dep Bloomin�rton/Eagan 1 0.2% N/A 0.0% 22 Dep So. Ri.chfield/Bloomi =loon 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 30L De) So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 249 41.1% 170 27.7% 30R De) So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 256 42.2% 227 37.1% 35 Dei So. Minneapolis 0 0.0%� N/A 0.0% Total Departures 606 613 Total O erations 1749 1724 Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100 due to rounding. A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program % 7 Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report February 2006 0.0%.: o or o°i° r 2.6% art 1 6-9% e 2.7.6°fo 6.9% .0%- .0% i 0/u _ . t - t MSP Runway Use Percentage Diagram RWY Arrival/ Count De acture OverflightArea Operation Percent Last Year Count Operations Last. Year Percent 4 Arr So. Ri.chfiel.d/BIoominaton 0 0.0% 0 12L Arr So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 36 3.3% 74*7" 12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 74 6.9% 20417 Arr So. Minn.ea olis 0 0.0% N/A22 Arr St. Paul/Hiahland Park 0 0.0% 030L Arr Ea an/Mendota Hei 7hts 668 62.0% 52030R Arr Eaean/Mendota Heights 297 27.6% 24335 Arr BloomiRLton/Eati=an 3 0.3% N/A Total Arrivals 10.78 10.41. 4 De? St. Paul/Hiahland. Park 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12L DS2 Eat an/M:endota Heights 36 6.9% 72 14.8% 12R Dep Ea-an/Mendota Heights 47 9.0% 97 20.0% 17 Dep Bloomin *ton/Ea an 0 0.0% N/A 0.0%- 22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield. 222 42.6% 145 29.8% 30R Dep So. M.innea olis/No. Richfield 216 41.5% 1.72 35.4% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0.0% N/A 0.0% Total Departures $21 486 _ Total Operations 1599 1 1527 Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. 8 �A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program February 2006 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Total Nighttime Jet Operations by Hour Hour Count 2230 435 2300 431 2400 173 100 61 200 24 300 28 400 74 500 373 TOTAL 1599 Airline ID Stage Type Count America. West AWE 3 A319 28 America West AWE 3 A320 27 America West AWE 3 B733 12 Air Wisconson AW] 3 CRJ 46 Continental Exp BTA 3 E145 40 Champion Air CCP 3 B72Q 56 Delta DAL 3 B73Q 35 DHL DHL 3 B72Q 53 American Ea le EGF 1 3 CRJ 15 American Eagle EGF 3 E145 30 FedEx FDX 3 A300 4 FedEx FDX 3 A310 17 FedEx FDX 3 B72Q 2 FedEx FDX. 3 DC10 39 Pinnacle FLG 3 CRJ 159 Kitty Hawk KHA 3 B72Q 5 Kitty Hawk KHA 3 B733 35 Mesaba. MES 3 CRJ 3 Nlesaba MES 3 RJ85 34 Northwest NWA 3 A319 71 Northwest NWA 3 A320 135 Northwest NWA 3 A333 1 Northwest NWA 3 B757 138 Northwest NWA 3 DC10 22 Northwest NWA 3 DC9Q 57 Sun Countiv I SCX 3 B738 225 United UAL3 B733 22 United UAL 3 B735 29 UPS UPS 3 A300 12 UPS UPS 3 B757 6 UPS UPS 3 B767 1. UPS UPS 3 DC8 32 Total 1391 Note. The top 15 nighttime operators represent 87.0% of the total nighttime carrier j et operations. A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program+ e 9 February 2006 Nighttime Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines�� 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. 500 400 0 .r Ld RS d 300 a. O 0 200 a z 100 _ s r ~ � GG4 ��ti " ti '4P ��+ Air.line ❑ Stage 2 ❑ Stage 3 ® Manufactured Stage 3 February 2006 Nighttime Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines 0:30 n.m. to 6:00 a.m. - Airline Stage 2 Stage 3 Manufactured Stage 3 Total AWE 0 0 67 67 AWI 0 0 46 46 BTA 0 0 40 40 CCP 0 56 0 56 DAL 0 35 0 35 DHL 0 53 0 53 EGF 0 0 45 45 FDX 0 2 60 62 FLG 0 0 159 159 KHA 0 5 35 40 MES 0 0 37 37 NWA 0 57 367 424 SCX 0 0 225 225 UAL 0 0 51 51 UPS 0 32 19 51 Total.: 0..... 240 1151 1,391 10 A Product of the UAroi2olitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations — February 2006 Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 4127 Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 4103 Carrier Jet Departures Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 276 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 113 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures \ Ly 7,e i \4 Y \, Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 276 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 113 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program _;:j,% 11 \ 7,e i \4 Y \, ` Sm IF N D' A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program _;:j,% 11 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations — February 2006 Feb 9 thru 16, 2006 — 4107 Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 9 thru 16, 2006 — 4091 Carrier Jet Departures Feb 9 thru 16, 2006 — 293 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals 5 milr N �� m Feb 9 thru 16, 2006 — 150 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures Y y. `1 4 ?' y 12 A Product of the Mp. litan Airports Commission ANOMS Program sq ff Y y. `1 4 ?' y 12 A Product of the Mp. litan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations — February 2006 Feb 17 thru 24, 2006 — 4416 Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 17 thru 24, 2006 — 4414 Carrier Jet Departures Feb 17 thru 24, 2006 — 343 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 17 thru 24, 2006 — 182 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Prog am 13 i w S N. N A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Prog am 13 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations — February 2006 Feb 25 thru 28, 2006 — 2142 Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 25 thru 28, 2006 —166 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 25 thru 28, 2006 — 2152 Carrier Jet Departures Feb 25 thru 28, 2006 — 76 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures 14 A Product of the Metran Airports Commission ANOMS Program `33 �xf EEIIJI Feb 25 thru 28, 2006 — 76 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures 14 A Product of the Metran Airports Commission ANOMS Program `33 Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System j Lemen 30 Remote Monitoring Tower • A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Progralp 15 4 Ar Lemen 30 Remote Monitoring Tower • A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Progralp 15 Time Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events February 2006 RMT ID Cit Address Time 65dB Time :2!8UdB Time ? 90dB Time > 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St. 4:28:31 0:00:08 0:00:00 0:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 5:05:09 0:00:47 0:00:00 0:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 7:16:20 0:17:28 0:00:19 0:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 6:00:47 0:03:44 0:00:00 0:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. &. 58th St, 8:41:45 1:40:31 0:01:13 0:00:00 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 7:40:49 1:07:49 0:00:47 0:00:00 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 0:10:10 0:00:11 0:00:00 0:00:00 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 0:06:46 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca. Ave. & Bowdoin St. 0:00:26 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 1.1. St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 0:00:28 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton. St. & Rockwood Ave. 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 0:13:53 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 14 Eagan 1 st St. & Mckee St. 27:50:35 0:00:57 0:00:00 0:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Culion. St. & Lexington Ave. I 0:43:00 0:00:31 0:00:00 0:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 28:55:31 1:34:39 0:00:09 0:00:00 17 Bloomineton 84th St. & 4th Ave. 0:01:59 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave 0:19:24 0:00:27 0:00:00 0:00:00 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 0:06:00 0:00:08 0:00:00 0:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 0:02:58 0:00:11 0:00:00 0:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 0:14:11 0:00:04 0:00:00 0:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 13:23:12 0:00:34 0:00:00 0:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 3:59:48 0:03:28 0:00:00 0:00:00 24 Eagan Cha lei Ln. & Wren Ln. 24:38:13 0:02:28 0:00:00 0:00:00 25 Ea an Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 1:13:08 0:00:31 0:00:00 0:00:00 26 Inver. Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 1:33:11 0:00:37 0:00:00 0:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irvin Ave. S. 0:07:42 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Avenue S: 0:36:00 0:00:29 0:00:00 0:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 0:00:10 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Rid e Rd. 4:03:51 0:00:19 1 0:00:00 0:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave, S. 0:06:01 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 0:00:28 1 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 0:04:34 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 0:06:09 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet 1n. 7:21:02 0:00:10 0:00:00 0:00:00 36 Apple Vallcv Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 10:47:21 0:00:22 0:00:00 0.:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 0:04:35 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Tur. uoise Cir. 0:01:28 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 39 E ran 3477 St Charles Pl. 0:01:36 0:00:02 0:00:00 0:00:00 Total Time for Arrival Related Events 166-07:11 4:;6:35 0:02:28 0:00:00 16 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 35— Time Above dB Threshold for Departure Related Noise Events February 2006 RMT ID ci!y Address Time >_ 65dB Time 1 >_ 80dB -F- T Time >_ 90dB>_ Time 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St. 3:52:58 0:05:050:00:03 0:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 4:45:.59 0:04:32 0:00:05 0:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 11:41:07 0:22:22 0:03:16 0:00:00 4 5 Minneapolis Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 12th Ave. & 58th St. 13:02:18 53:38:39 0:14:50 4:44:47 0:00:45 0:49:54 0:00:00 0:01:30 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 63:45:31 6:27:13 1:10:40 0:00:20 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 1 29:17:51 1:14:35 0:04:19 0:00:00 8 Minnea olis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 14:12:44 0:22:49 0:00:12 0:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 0:02:11 0:00:03 0:00:00 0:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 0:01:30 0:00:01 0:00:00 0:00:00 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 0:03:42 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 0:01:59 0:00:00 0:00:00 0:00:00 13 Mendota I-Ieiahts Southeast end of Mohican Court 3:11:27 0:01:53 0:00:01 0:00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & Mckee St. 3:58:50 0:12:52 0:00:41 0:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. &. Lexington Ave. 4:22:30 0:04:43 0:00:00 0:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 4:10:44 0:17:39 0:02:14 0:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 0:24:02 0:00:25 0:00:00 0:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave 4:13:42 0:01:48 0:00:00 0:00:00 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 3:11:03 0:00:55 0:00:00 0:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 1:01:11 0:00:40 0:00:00 0:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 1:10:43 0:00:11 0:00:00 0:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 1:02:10 0:00:51 0:00:00 0:00:00 23 Mendota Hei6;hts End of Ken ndon Ave. 7:00:40 0:28:10 0:02:18 0:00:00 24 Ea65an Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 2:26:52 0:03:21 0:00:02 0:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park. 1321. Jurdy Rd. 2:10:55 0:00:37 0:00:04 0:00:00 26 Inver Grove_ Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 1:42:35 0:02:42 0:00:00 0:00:00 27 Minnea?olis Anthony School 5757 Irving, Ave. S. 14:04:44 0:30:09 0:02:46 0:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Avenue S. 25:33:04 0:12:35 0:00:33 0:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 9:42:44 0:08:36 0:00:27 0:00:00 30 Bloomi yton 8715 River Ridge Rd 6:16:40 0:34:17 0:00:40 0:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 0:36:47 0:00:20 0:00:00 0:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 0:20:45 0:00:21 0:00:00 0:00:00 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 2:09:41 0:01:53 0:00:00 0:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 1:06:12 0:00:27 0:00:00 0:00:00 35 Egan 2100 Garnet In. 1:12:29 0:00:41 0:00:00 0:00:00 36 App le Val.le_v Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 0:21:19 0:00:1.3 0:00:00 0:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Wood ate Ln. N. 0:39:00 0:00:29 0:00:00 0:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 1:12:24 0:00:44 0:00:00 0:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St Charles Pl. 0:50:15 0:00:20 0:00:00 0:00:00 Total Time for Departure Related Events 298:39:57 16:18:09 2:19:00 0:01:50 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 17 -36 Arrival Related Noise Events February 2006 RMT ID City Address Arrival Events ? 65dB Arrival Events > 8OdB Arrival Events >_ 90dB Arrival Events >: 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St. 1339 4 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 1504 30 0 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 1742 293 3 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 1669 84 0 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 1854 1304 32 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 1770 1231 30 0 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 39 1 0 0 8 Minneapolis I Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 25 0 0 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 4 0 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 2 0 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 2 0 0 0 12 St. Paul. Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 3 0 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 58 0 0 0 14 Eagan 1 st St. & Mckee St. 6508 27 0 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 156 8 0 I 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 5887 1172 5 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. I 11 0 0 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave 95 5 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 26 4 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 12 2 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 83 1 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 3406 15 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 990 33 0 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 6088 1 46 0 1 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 259 8 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 485 8 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 32 0 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Avenue S. 129 6 0 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 9 0 0 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 1165 3 0 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 27 0 0 0 32 I Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 8 0 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 22 0 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 39 0 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet In. 1896 5 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 2310 9 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 19 0 0 0 38 .Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 9 0 r 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St Charles Pl. 11 I 1_ 0 �� 0 Total Arrival Noise Events 39693 4300_ 70 I 0 18 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Departure Related Noise Events February 2006 RMT ID City Address Departure Events ? 65dB Departure Events �t 80dB Departure Events >_ 90dB Departure Events >_ 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 830 36 1 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 1063 45 2 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 2310 140 31 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48tb St. 2594 174 12 I 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 8428 1616 432 28 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 10443 2701 647 11 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 5032 479 50 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 2657 226 3 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 15 1 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 7 1 1 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 17 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 20 0 0 0 13 Mendota. Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 730 27 1 0 14 Eagan 1 st St. & Mckee St. 789 1.09 11 0 15 Mendota Heights Cuilon St. & Lexington Ave. 937 62 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 765 118 20 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 86 4 0 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave 862 50 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 691 17 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 238 6 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67tb St. 290 5 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 198 10 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 1370 231 36 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 509 34 1 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 31.5 5 1. 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 383 28 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 57571rving Ave. S. 2786 221 19 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Avenue S. 4374 165 5 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 1986 82 1 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd 1113 167 18 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 148 3 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 64 4 1 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 435 21 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 251 5 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet In. 274 12 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 70 1 0 1 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 137 12 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 246 13 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St Charles Pl. 219 4 0 0 Total Departure Noise Events 53682 6835 1291 39 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 19 32 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Feb -06 (RMT Site# 1) Xerxes Ave. & 41" St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 02/19/200616:53 CCP466 B72Q D 30L 90.3 02/02/200616:58 CCP466 B72Q D 30L 89.1 02/17/200610:26 CCP1102 B72Q D 30L 88.1 02/20/200616:41 CCP1464 B72Q D 30L 87.8 02/09/200617:32 CCP466 B72Q D 30L 87.8 02/02/200616:13 CCP1462 B72Q D 30L 85.5 02/10/200613:16 NWA19 B744 D 30L 85.3 02./19/200616:05 CCP1462 B72Q D 30L 85.2 02/17/200613:21 NWA19 B744 D 30L 84.8 02/20/200611:15 CCP1102 B72Q D 30L 84.3 (RMT Site#2) Fremont Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/01/200613:28 NWA19 B744 D 30L 90.7 02/20/200616:40 CCP1464 B72Q D 30L 90.4 02/15/200613:28 NWA19 B744 D 30L 89.8 02/14/2006 08:59 CCI706 B72Q D 30R 89.1 02/26/200613:31 NWA19 B744 D 30L 89.0 02/15/2006 23:37 CCI705 B72Q D 30L 88.6 02/19/200616:04 CCP1462 B72Q D 30L 87.9 02/17/200614:37 ' NWA205W DC9Q D 30R 87.5 02/1.2/200615:46 NWA42 DC10 D 30L 87.4 02/06/200613:15' NWA19 B744 D 30L 87.3 (RMT Site#3) West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/02/200616:57 CCP466 B72Q D 30L 98.4 02/09/200617:32 CCP466 B72Q D 30L 98.1 02/09/200616:36 CCP1462 B72Q D 30L 97.3 02/02/200616:13 CCP1462 B72Q D 30L 96.9 02/20/200616:40 CCP1464 B72Q D 30L 96.1 02/17/200610:25 CCP1102 B72Q D 30L 96.0 02/20/200611:14 CCP1102 B72Q D 30L 95.6 02/19/2006 07:51 CCP1460 B72Q D 30L 95.3 02/19/200616:52 CCP466 B72Q D 30L 95.1 02/01/200613:28 NWA19 B744 D 30L 94.8 20 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program :3q Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Feb -06 (RMT Site#4) Park Ave. & 48th St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/01/2006 07:39 CCI706 B72Q D 30L 95.8 02/22/200613:19 NWA19 B744 D 30L 93.4 02/16/200613:15 NWA19 B744 D 30L 92.8 02/25/200613:35 NWA19 B744 D 30L 92.2 02/14/2006 08:58 CCI706 B72Q D 30R 92.0 02/05/200613:05 NWA19 B744 D 30L 92.0 02/25/2006 22:23 NWA1469 DC9Q D 30R 91.0 02/03/2006 07:59 CCI706 B72Q D 30R 90.9 02/12/2006 22:32 NWA1469 DC9Q D 30R 90.9 1 02/24/2006 15:491 NWA42 DC10 D 301, 90.5 (RMT Site#5) 1It' AvP Ar iRt' qt Minneanolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax (dB) 02/22/200615:34 NWA690 DC9Q Departure 30R 102.1 02/26/200617:21 CCP420 B72Q D 30L 103.8 02/01/200610:24 CCP1400 B72Q D 30L 103.7 02/05/2006 08:49 CCP1452 B72Q D 30L 103.5 02/19/200615:48 CCP420 B72Q D 30L 102.8 02/20/2006 07:42 CCP1450 B72Q D 30L 102.7 02/05/200616:03 CCP420 B72Q D 30L 102.7 02/09/200616:50 CCP420 B72Q D 30L 102.4 02/17/200610:25 CCP1102 B72Q D 30L 1 102.1 02/20/200611:14 CCP1102 B72Q D 30L 102.1 02/23/200615:40 CCP420 B72Q D I 30L 102.0 (RMT Site#6) 25th Ave. & 57th St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number I Aircraft Type I Arrival/ I Runway Lmax (dB) 02/14/2006 08:58 CCI706 B72Q D 30R 104.6 02/22/200615:34 NWA690 DC9Q D 30R 102.1 02/24/200615:47 NWA132 DC9Q D 30R 101.6 02/03/2006 07:58 CCI706 B72Q D 30R 101.5 02/26/2006 21:501 NWA929 DC9Q D 30R 100.7 02/26/200616:26 NWA497 DC9Q D 30R 100.6 02/26/200617:45 NWA1053 DC9Q D 30R 100.6 02/13/2006 21:11 NWA1957 DC9Q D 30R 100.4 02/22/200614:50 NWA1951 DC9Q D 30R 100.4 02/17/2006 17:291 NWA926 I DC9Q I D 30R 1 100.2 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 21 40 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Feb -06 (RMT Site#7) Wentworth Ave. & 64th St., Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/25/200616:06 CCP420 B72Q D 30L 97.5 02/17/2006 09:05 CCP422 B72Q D 30L 97.1 02/22/2006 08:35 CCP1410 B72Q D 30L 97.0 02/16/200616:56 CCP420 B72Q D 30L 96.8 02/08/2006 07:24 CCP436 B72Q D 30L 96.4 02/04/200612:29 CCP1400 B72Q D 30L 96.0 02/04/200612:27 RRR2112 DC9Q D 30L 95.8 02/20/2006 23:41 XNA123 B72Q D 30L 95.7 02/17/200616:04 CCP434 B72Q D 30L 95.7 02/15/2006 07:11 CCP436 B72Q D 30L 95.6 (RMT Site#8) Longfellow Ave. & 43`d St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/04/200613:36 NWA754 DC9Q D 30R 91.6 02/09/2006 23:37 CCI705 B72Q D 30L 91.2 02/17/2006 08:14 Unknown BE18 D 30R 90.7 02/16/2006 23:35 CCI705 B72Q D 30L 89.9 02/22/2006 23:43 CCI705 B72Q D 30L 89.7 02/04/200614:44 AAL827 MD80 D 30R 89.6 02/15/2006 21:23 NWA1843 DC9Q D 30R 89.1 02/08/2006 09:08 AAL1127 MD80 D 30R 89.0 02/26/200615:03 NWA1951 DC9Q D 30R 88.9 02/22/200615:35 NWA690 DC9Q D 30R 88.4 (RMT Site#9) Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 02/01/200623:45 CCI705 B72Q D 30L 81.2 02/04/2006 07:32 BMJ48 BE80 D 30R 75.5 02/18/200617:48 NWA136 DC9Q D 30L 71.4 02/17/2006 22:40 NWA760 A320 D 30R 70.2 02/21/2006 23:50 KHA772 B733 D 30L 69.8 02/27/2006 07:46 Unknown BE18 D 17 69.5 02/27/2006 07:49 BMJ13 BE80 D 12R 68.9 02/22/2006 22:251 NWA354 I B757 D 30R 68.5 22 A Product of the etropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Feb -06 (RMT Site# 10) Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 02/27/2006 07:46 Unknown BE18 D 17 80.8 02/04/2006 07:31 BMJ48 BE80 D 30R 76.9 02/17/2006 20:17 Unknown BE18 A 35 72.9 02/24/2006 09:26 TCA1 Unknown D 12L 71.7 02/08/200610:43 MES2760 SF34 A 12L 70.3 (RMT Site# 11) Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/27/200607:46 Unknown BE18 D 17 79.0 02/01/2006 23:45 CCI705 B72Q D 30L 77.5 02/17/2006 20:16 Unknown BE18 A 35 77.2 02/08/200614:32 MES3262 SF34 D 30R 75.8 02/01/200619:24 NWA1654 B757 D 30R 75.6 02/21/2006 23:50 KHA772 B733 D 30L 73.6 02/18/2006 01:42 KHA1850 B733 D 30L 72.4 02/13/2006 23:20 CCI705 B72Q D 30L 72.2 02/17/2006 22:40 NWA760 A320 D 30R 71.5 02/01/200619:25 Unknown SR22 D 30L 70.4 (RMT Site#12) Alton St. & Rockwood Ave., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De . arture Runway Lmax (dB) 02/14/2006 00:03 TCA1 Unknown D 12L 78.3 02/24/2006 07:24 BW62 BE80 D 12L 73.1 02/27/2006 21:35 Unknown SR20 D 12R 73.0 02/28/2006 07:18 BMJ66 BE80 D 12R 71.8 02/28/2006'07:28 BMJ68 BE99 D 12L 71.5 02/28/2006 07:291 BMJ62 I BE80 D 12L 70.1 02/24/2006 07:23 BMJ62 BE80 D 12L 68.7 02/27/2006 11:251 MES2759 SF34 D I 12L L 66.7 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS P ogram 23 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Feb -06 (RMT Site# 13) Southeast End Of Mohican Court, Mendota Heights Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/09/2006 07:42 CCI706 B72Q D 12R 90.4 02/26/200612:02 NWA99 DC10 D 12R 85.8 02/26/200610:59 AAL1435 MD80 D 12L 85.3 02/21/2006 21:59 NWA929 DC9Q D 12L 85.1 02/26/2006 09:07 AAL1127 MD80 D 12L 83.4 02/09/200615:21 NWA1471 DC9Q D 12L 83.0 02/27/2006 07:33 CCP9650 B72Q D 12R 83.0 02/24/2006 09:37 AAL1127 MD80 D 12L 82.7 02/27/2006 09:12 AAL1127 MD80 D 12L 82.7 02/21/2006 22:30 NWA1469 DC9Q D 12L 82.2 (RMT Site# 14) 1 st St. & Mckee St., Eagan Date/Time . Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax (dB) Departure 02/02/200611:17 CCP468 B72Q D 12R 93.4 02/26/2006 06:48 CCP1412 B72Q D 12R 92.8 02/26/2006 08:41 CCP1452 B72Q D 12R 92.5 02/28/200613:40 NWA19 B744 D 12R 92.5 02/02/200607:03 DHL1648 B72Q D 12R 92.2 02/09/2006 06:22 CCP436 B72Q D 12R 91.7 02/21/2006 21:02 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 91.5 02/21/200613:18 NWA19 B744_ D 12R 90.3 02/24/200613:26 NWA19 B744 D 12R 90.1 02/27/200613:26 NWA19 B744 D 12R 90.1 (RMT Site#15) C'i llnn qt_ Rr. Lexington Ave.. Mendota Heichts Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Runway Lmax (dB) De arture 02/21/2006 21:58 NWA929 DC9Q D 12L 89.4 02/27/200617:15 NWA1053 DC9Q D 12L 87.8 02/21/200613:08 NWA447 DC9Q D 12L 87.4 02/26/2006 09:06 AAL1127 MD80 D 12L 87.3 02/27/2006 07:32 CCP9650 B72Q D 12R 87.0 02/24/200614:21 NWA1205 DC9Q D 12L 86.5 02/02/2006 07:31 NWA1000 DC9Q D 12L 86.0 02/26/200610:59 AAL1435 MD80 D 12L 1 85.3 02/24/2006 09:37 AAL1127 MD80 D 12L 85.3 02/21/200614:39 NWA737 DC9Q I D 12L 85.3 24 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Feb -Q6 (RMT Site# 16) Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane, Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/27/2006 08:07 CCP402 B72Q D 12R 97.6 02/24/200615:01 CCP428 B72Q D 12R 97.4 02/27/200611:21 CCP434 B72Q D 12R 96.9 02/02/2006 06:21 CCP436 B72Q D 12R 96.6 02/27/2006 07:06 CCP1450 B72Q D 12R 96.5 02/02/200611:17 CCP468 B72Q D 12R 96.0 02/24/2006 07:19 CCP1450 B72Q D 12R 95.3 02/26/2006 07:43 CCP1460 B72Q D 12R 94.1 02/28/200613:39 NWA19 B744 D 12R 94.1 02/27/2006 06:08 CCP1490 B72Q D 12R 1 93.6 (RMT Site#17) 84th St. & 4th Ave., Bloomington Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/13/2006 22:19 FDX1106 B72Q D 30L 86.0 02/17/2006 22:47 NWA1839 DC9Q D 30L 81.2 02/27/2006 20:34 TCA1 Unknown D 12R 80.6 02/09/200619:37 NWA446 DC9Q D 30L 80.0 02/01/2006 23:27 XNA123 B72Q D 30L 79.8 02/22/200619:04 NWA1674 DC9Q D 30L 79.8 02/08/2006 06:47 BNU56 BE80 D 30L 79.6 02/17/2006 22:27 FDX2618 DC10 D 30L 78.5 02/17/2006 22:31 NWA974 DC9Q D 30L 78.2 02/17/2006 22:101 UPS559 I A300 D 30L 76.9 (RMT Site# 18) 75th St. & 17th Ave, Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/24/200615:20 AAL1118 1VID80 A 30L 88.8 02/27/200610:13 NWA498 DC9Q D 17 83.6 02/09/200612:53 NWA1280 DC9Q D 17 83.5 02/24/200610:27 NWA1202 DC9Q D 17 82.8 02/28/200613:44 NWA130 DC9Q D 17 82.5 02/02/2006 08:13 CCP1460 B72Q D 17 82.3 02/24/200611:35 NWA128 DC9Q D 17 82.3 02/28/2006 07:26 CCI706 B72Q D 17 82.3 02/02/2006 08:34 AAL631 MD80 D 17 82.2 02/02/2006 09:25 NWA410 DC9Q D 1 17 82.1 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 25 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for, MSI' Feb -06 (RMT Site# 19) 16th Ave. & 84th St., Bloomington Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 02/27/200620:34 TCA1 Unknown D 12R 85.7 02/15/2006 20:36 TCA1 Unknown D 17 85.2 02/24/200611:36 NWA128 DC9Q D 17 84.9 02/02/200610:59 NWA768- DC9Q D 17 83.4- 02/21/2006 20:47 TCA1 Unknown D 17 83.2 02/27/2006 08:39 MES3337 CRJ D 17 82.3 02/22/2006 06:55 BMJ64 BE80 D 30L 82.2 02/01/2006 20:22 TCA1 Unknown D 17 81.9 02/24/2006 07:32 BMJ64 BE80 D 17 81.5 02/27/200613:35 NWA856 DC9Q D 17 81.5 (RMT Site#20) 75th St. & 3rd Ave., Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De parture Runway Lmax (dB) 02/13/2006 22:18 FDX1106 B72Q D 30L 88.2 02/28/2006 07:33 MES3337 CRJ D 17 87.3 02/09/200614:55 CCP437 B72Q A 12L 85.1 02/08/2006 06:46 BW56 BE80 D 30L 81.8 02/14/2006 07:35 MES3091 SF34 D 30R 81.0 02/24/200615:21 AAL1118 MD80 A 30L 80.4 02/09/20.0619:37 NWA446 DC9Q D 30L 80.2 02/03/2006 06:48 BMJ56 BE80 D 30L 80.0 02/14/200615:23 CHQ5341 E145 D 30L 79.8 02/14/2006 09:49 MES3020 SF34 D 30L 79.6 (RMT Site#21) Barbara Ave. & 67th St., Inver Grove Heights Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 02/17/200611:35 MES3691 RJ85 A 30R 87.4 02/09/200614:00 NWA1080 DC9Q D 12L 82.1 02/28/200610:22 NWA1840 DC9Q D 12L 82.1 02/21/2006 22:31 NWA1469 DC9Q D 12L 80.7 02/02/2006 07:03 CCI706 B72Q D 12R 80.2 02/28/200614:00 NWA734 DC9Q D 12L 80.0 02/24/2006 09:48 NWA1212 DC9Q D 12L 79.8 02/21/200613:06 NWA734 DC9Q D 12L 79.6 02/26/200611:04 NWA454 DC9Q D 12R 79.5 02/28/200610:48 NWA1946 DC9Q D 12L 79.2 26 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Feb -06 (RMT Site#22) •1 T /�___ _ TT_�_i_1 Date/Time Anne iviane Iraii, Inver Flight Number Aircraft Type vrove rneigIiL5 Arrival/ De , arture Runway Lmax (dB) 02/02/200611:18 CCP468 B72Q D D 12R 86.4 02/21/2006 21:02 DHL197 B72Q D 12L 12R 84.5 02/03/200611:44 02/27/2006 22:19 NWA1048 FDX1106 A319 B72Q A D 96.2 30L 12R 83.6 82.7 02/17/200613:28 CCP1491 B72Q A 02/09/200615:52 30L 82.5 02/14/2006 09:24 02/14/2006 09:241 NWA1840 NWA1840 DC9Q DC9Q A A NWA408 30R 30R 82.3 82.3 02/26/2006 06:49 CCP1412 B72Q D DC9Q DC9Q 12R 82.2 02/08/2006 07:48 NWA795 DC9Q A D 30L 82.2 02/02/2006 07:04 DHL1648 B72Q D 12L 12R 81.9 (RMT Site#23) End of Kenndon Avenue, Mendota Heights Date/Time I Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/02/200610:26 NWA748 DC9Q D 12L 98.0 02/21/2006 21:58 NWA929 DC9Q D 12L 97.2 02/02/200612:07 NWA750 DC9Q D 12L 96.2 02/21/200614:51 NWA1951 DC9Q D 12L 95.6 02/09/200615:52 NWA690 DC9Q D 12L 94.6 02/21/2006 21:39 NWA408 DC9Q D 12L 94.5 02/21/200616:53 02/21/200622:30 NWA1053 NWA1469 DC9Q DC9Q D D 12L 12L 93.9 93.6 02/26/200611:57 NWA1047 DC9Q D 12L 93.5 02/02/200613:05 NWA1895 DC9Q I D 12L 92.8 (RMT Site#24) Chapel Lane & Wren Lane, Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 02/02/200611:17 CCP468 B72Q D 12R 90.5 02/06/200611:57 NWA614 A320 A 30L 89.0 02/03/200613:53 MES3671 RJ85 A 30R 88.4 02/21/2006 21:02 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 88.4 02/26/2006 06:48 CCP1412 B72Q D 12R 87.5 02/09/2006 06:22 CCP436 B72Q D 12R 87.0 02/02/2006 06:22 CCP436 B72Q D 12R 86.9 02/03/200614:01 UAL1200 B735 A 30R 86.6 02/25/2006 08:29 FLG5625 CRj A 30R 85.7 02/02/2006 07:031 DHL1648 B72Q D 12R 85.5 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMSroogram 27 1 "'C Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Feb -06 (RMT Site#25) Moonshine Park, 1321 Jurdy Rd., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/02/200613:18 NWA19 B744 D 12R 90.7 02/24/200615:02 CCP428 B72Q. D 12R 83.8 02/16/2006 22:20 SCX206 B738 A 30L 83.3 02/10/200613:29 CCP1491 B72Q A 30L 82.3 02/10/200613:25 FFT102 A318 A 30L 81.9 02/22/2006 03:31 MDS120 SW3 D 12R 81.8 02/10/200613:27 COM493 CRJ A 30L 81.1 02/02/2006 21:28 SCX248 B738 A 30L 81.0 02/08/200611:07 AAL1435 MD80 D 12R 80.8 02/13/2006 08:17 NWA410 DC9Q A 30L 80.5 (RMT Site#26) 6796 Arkansas Ave. W., Inver Grove Heights Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/09/200613:10 NWA19 B744 D 12R 86.2 02/24/2006 06:23 CCP432 B72Q D 12R 85.7 02/02/2006 09:14 Unknown GLF2 D 12R 84.9. 02/21/2006.23:11 CCI705 B72Q D 12R 84.5 02/27/2006 21:03 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 84.5 02/14/2006 20:41 AAL1554 MD80 A 30R 84.0 02/24/2006 07:24 C0706 B72Q D 12R 83.9 02/02/2006 07:03 CCI706 B72Q D 12R 83.6 02/24/200613:26 NWA19 B744 D 12R 83.0 02/21/2006 22:39 DHL304 B720 D 12R 83.0 (RMT Site#27) Anthony Middle School, 5757 Irving Ave. S., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/11/200615:57 CCP420 B72Q D 30L 97.2 02/08/2006 09:27 CCP1400 B72Q D 30L 97.1 02/26/200617:22 CCP420 B72Q D 30L 97.1 02/16/200616:22 CCP1462_ B72Q D 30L 96.3 02/12/2006 06:50 CCP436 B72Q D 30L 94.5 02/12/2006 09:03 CCP1452 B72Q D 30L 94.4 02/25/2006 07:30 CCP1410 B72Q D 30L 94.0 02/16/200617:49 CCP466 B72Q D 30L 93.1 02/16/2006 07:48 CCP1460 B72Q D 30L 92.9 02/04/2006 07:22 CCP436 B72Q D 30L 92.5 28 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program '41 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Feb -06 (RMT Site#28) 6645 16th Avenue S., Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De arture Runway Lmax (dB) 02/24/2006 21:12 DHL197 B72Q D 30L 95.9 02/02/2006 22:00 ABX333 DC9Q D 30L 93.4 02/17/200614:31 NWA494 DC9Q D 30L 92.9 02/17/2006 21:15 DHL197 B72Q D 30L 92.6 02/11/200618:52 NWA1674 DC9Q D 30L 91.5 02/09/200619:37 NWA446 DC9Q D 30L 89.3 02/01/2006 06:54 DHL1648 B72Q D 30L 88.9 02/24/200619:01 NWA1674 DC9Q D 30L 88.5 02/22/2006 20:59 DHL197 B72Q D 30L 1 88.4 02/17/200614:11 DAL553 MD80 D 30L 88.1 (RMT Site#29) Ericsson Elementary School, 4315 31st Ave. S., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/17/200611:36 AAL1435 MD80 D 30R 91.0 02/22/200617:24 NWA926 DC9Q D 30R 89.5 02/02/200616:58 NWA926 DC9Q D 30L 88.7 02/16/2006 07:43 AAL1487 MD80 D 30R 88.4 02/04/200611:15 AAL1435 1,,M80 D 30R 88.3 02/13/2006 09:17 AAL1127 MD80 D 30R 87.8 02/24/20,0617:33 NWA926 DC9Q D 30R 87.7 02/02/200618:38 UAL762 A319 D 30R 86.9 02/03/2006 07:20 AAL1487 MD80 D 30R 86.4 02/13/2006 23:201 CCI705 B72Q D 30L 85.7 (RMT Site#30) 8715 River Ridge Rd., Bloomington Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/27/200617:00 NWA1967 DC9Q D 17 92.1 02/21/200617:21 NWA1967 DC9Q D 17 92.1 02/09/2006 07:50 CCP1460 B72Q D 17 92.1 02/02/2006 08:14 CCP1460 B72Q D 17 91.4 02/08/200613:46 NWA409 DC9Q D 17 91.3 02/27/2006 07:12 NWA122 DC9Q D 17 91.2 02/26/200613:47 NWA130 DC9Q D 17 91.1 02/27/200617:27 NWA1289 DC9Q D 17 91.0 02/27/200611:31 NWA1055 DC9Q D 17 90.6 02/21/2006 13:451 NWA130 DC9Q D 17 90.6 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 29 H 9 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP - Feb -06 (RMT Site#31) 9501 12th Ave. S., Bloomington Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ De -)arture Runway Lmax (dB) 02/24/2006 20:57 TCA1 Unknown D 17 87.3 02/24/2006 07:33 BMJ64 BE80 D 17 84.1 02/17/2006 22:47 NWA1839 DC9Q D 30L 81.2 02/22/200619:05 NWA1674 DC9Q D 30L 79.7 02/19/2006 22:35 NWA974 DC9Q D 30L 79.3 02/21/200612:05 NWA777 B757 D 17 78.2 02/09/2006 21:04 DHL197 B72Q D 17 78.1 02/09/200619:38 NWA446 DC9Q D 3IL 1 78.1 02/24/200611:42 MES3191 SF34 D 17 78.0 02/24/2006 09:491 NWA883 A320 D 17 77.9 (RMT Site#32) 10325 Pleasant Ave. S., Bloomington Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/24/200616:01 CCP434 B720 D 30L 84.3 02/13/2006 22:19 FDX1106 B72Q D 30L 81.3 02/24/200615:27 NWA1170 DC9Q D 30L 81.2 02/04/2006 05:32 DAL965 B73Q D 30L 80.2 02/24/2006 07:33 BMT64 BE80 D 17 79.5 02/11/2006 07:22 CCP436 B72Q D 30L 78.4 02/13/2006 23:42 XNA123 B72Q D 30L 77.2 02/14/200610:57 NWA1174 DC9Q D 30L 77.2 02/09/2006 20:07 NWA1208 DC9Q D 30L 76.6 02/22/2006 16:511 L1073 MD80 D 30L 76.4 (RMT Site#33) North River Hills Park, Burnsville Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/02/2006 08:15 CCP1460 B72Q D 17 89.3 02/09/2006 07:51 CCP1460 B72Q D 17 85.2 02/09/200611:00 CCP468 B72Q D 17 84.4 02/02/2006 07:07 KHA712 B72Q D 17 83.1 02/28/2006 07:27 CCI706 B72Q D 17 82.6 02/08/200611:33 NWA1441 DC9Q D 17 82.5 02/27/200612:09 AAL1316 MD80 D 17 82.4 02/24/2006 07:21 CCP1450 B72Q D 12R 82.0 02/02/2006 08:36 AAL631 MD80 D 17 81.8 02/24/200613:04 NWA1148 DC9Q D 17 81.8 30 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 4q Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Feb -06 (RMT Site#34) Red Oak Park, Burnsville Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/02/2006 08:15 CCP1460 B72Q D 17 83.7 02/27/2006 07:13 NWA122 DC9Q D 17 82.9 02/21/2006.14:36 NWA973 DC9Q D 17 81.5 02/24/200614:46 NWA973 DC9Q D 17 81.0 02/22/200617:30 NWA136 DC9Q D 17 80.3 02/26/200611:50 NWA1079 DC9Q D 17 79.5 02/02/200610:33 NWA1840 DC9Q D 17 79.4 02/22/200615:40 NWA1287 DC9Q D 17 79.4 02/09/200614:02 Unknown PA32 D 12R 79.3 02/02/2006 09:28 NWA411 DC9Q D 1 17 79.1 (RMT Site#35) 2100 Garnet Ln., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/21/200618:05 RAX222 LJ25 D 17 85.0 02/24/2006 07:20 CCP1450 B72Q D 12R 84.0 02/02/200615:00 AAL827 MD80 D 17 82.6 02/13/200614:02 NWA133 A319 A 35 82.2 02/22/200617:05 AAL1975 MD80 D 17 82.1 02/28/200613:36 NWA856 DC9Q D 17 81.7 02/20/200613:19 Unknown FA50 A 35 81.6 02/27/2006 07:17 DAL199 MD80 D 17 81.1 02/24/200615:57 NWA502 DC9Q D 17 80.9 02/08/2006 20:181 BW61 BE80 A 35 80.8 (RMT Site#36) Briar Oaks & Scott Pond, Apple Valley Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/27/200616:34 CCP1464 B72Q D 12R 83.8 02/03/200612:35 FLG2860 CRJ A 35 83.3 02/20/200613:02 CHQ5338 E145 A 35 82.7 02/07/2006 08:07 NWA1629 A320 A 35 82.3 02/23/200612:24 MES2725 SF34 A 35 81.9 02/15/2006 07:54 MES2750 SF34 A 35 81.6 02/17/200618:15 FDX728 DC10 A 35 81.5 02/22/2006 08:04 NWA121 A319 A 35 80.8 02/26/200615:55 NWA449 DC9Q A 35 80.5 02/17/2006 17:341 MES2708 SF34 A 35 1 80.2 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 31 15D Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Feb -06 (RMT Site#37) 4399 Woodgate Ln. N., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/02/200611:14 AAL1435 MD80 D 17 82.2 02/21/200617:23 AAL1975 MD80 D 17 82.2 02/26/2006 08:47 TAG399 GLF3 D 12R 82.2 02/27/2006 07:17 DAL199 MD80 D 17 82.1 02/24/200610:41, NWA454 DC9Q D 17 81.6 02/24/200611:37 NWA128 DC9Q D 17. 81.1 02/24/2006 09:11 CCP422 B72Q D 12R 80.8 02/21/200614:51 AAL827 MD80 D 17 80.8 02/27/200619:34 NWA1043 DC9Q D 17 80.7 02/27/200619:44 NWA732 DC9Q D 17 80.6 (RMT Site#38) 3957 Turquoise Cir., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/09/2006 07:15 CCP1412 B72Q D 17 89.0 02/02/200611:14 AAL1435 MD80 D 17 84.0 02/27/200611:57 NWA605 DC9Q D 17 83.5 02/24/2006 07:34 NWA1284 DC9Q D 17 81.8 02/28/200615:34 NWA1170 DC9Q D 17 81.2 02/21/200618:05 RAX222 LJ25 D 17 81.1 02/02/200611:00 NWA768 DC9Q D 17 80.9 02/24/200610:29 NWA1202 DC9Q D 17 80.8 02/21/200614:51 AAL827 MD80 D 17 80.6 02/27/2006 07:27 NWA1284 DC9Q D 17 80.2 (RMT Site#39) 3477 St. Charles Pl., Eagan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax (dB) 02/28/2006 09:13 AAL1127 MD80 D 17 83.7 02/27/200610:52 NWA508 DC9Q D 17 83.6 02/08/200611:16 NWA125 DC9Q D 17 81.6 02/21/200613:40 NWA856 DC9Q D 17 80.8 02/23/200617:50 FFT100 A319 A 35 80.4 02/08/200611:42 NWA128 DC9Q D 17 78.6 02/27/200613:09 NWA1868 DC9Q D 17 78.6 02/21/200619:39 NWA1208 DC9Q D 17 78.6 02/27/200610:54 NWA1946 DC9Q D 17 78.5 02/21/200613:46 NWA1868 DC9Q D 17 78.5 February 2006 Remote Monitoring Tower Tor) Ten Summa The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for February 2006 were comprised of 90.6% departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the 8727 Hushed with 33.9% of the highest Lmax events. February 2006 Technical Advisor Report Notes Unknown fields are due to unavailability of FAA flight track data. Missing FAA radar data for 0.0 days during the month of February 2006. 32 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program �I Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dBA February 2006 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 1 50.9 53.9 60.1 60.9 73.1 73.6 65.4 59.4 51.1 34.1 47.0 31.2 4 3. 33 64.2 44.9 2 58.5 59.5 1 66.5 62.7 73.3 73.5 65.4 59.8 33.8 1 n/a 38.7 25.8 56.6 65.2 61.0 3 52.0 53.2 56.1 58.9 69.6 73.1 65.7 58.6 n/a I n/a 29.7 32.9 n/a 61.8 47.3 4 51.9 50.5 57.7 55.5 71.4 70.5 65.71 58.2 36.2 38.6 38.7 34.9 38.8 57.8 41.0 5 54.7 55.5 56.2 57.7 72.0 69.8 61.3 55.2 35.2 29.9 40.7 n/a n/a 57.6 25.6 6 50:9 52.1 55.8 58.5 70.0 69.8 62.7 55.6 26.1 ni"a n/a 33.8 34.3 56.8 42.0 7 53.2 53.8 60.0 60.9 70.8 71.4 66.0 58.9 n/a n/a 26.8 n/a 46.4 57.8 49.1 8 49.1 52.2 58.4 56.9 69.8 70.6 65.3 60.9 n/a 36.2 34.4 39.0 44.6 57.9 46.8 9 56.4 58.01 65.1 61.4 71.2 73.5 64.7 62.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a 1 55.8 65.0 58.0 10 56.4 54.6 63.3 61.8 73.8 73.1 66.2 57.8 27.7 11/a n/a n/a 31.4 62.8 51.9 11 55.1 52.0 58.6 56.9 72.1 70.61 65.5 57.6 n/a n/a n/a i1ra n/a 60.1 1 32.3 12 50. 1 53.8 58.5 60.61 71.7 71.3 61.8 56.01 40.71 41.3 35.2 n/a 41.5 59.0 34.2 13 51.9 53.7 60.9 59.2 72.2 72.2 66.1 59.0 n/a n/a 44.2 n/a 46.6 60.9 42.5 1.4 54.1 55.4 57.6 58.3 69.3 73.1 66.1 59.5 n/a 32.2 36.3 1 45.5 35.4 62.0 48.4 15 53.7 59.3 59.1 56.7 71.1 71.1 64.0 58.3 n/a 38.6 n/a 31.8 41.4 57.4 33.6 16 50.6 51.1 56.7 59.2 71.9 71.3 67.6 61.9 n/a lva n/a i.iia 27.41 58.5 1 34.5 17 56.1 53.6 64.9 58.9 72.5 72.4 67.8 61.5 39.6 35.7 43.4 33.1 41.3 61.3 1 34.7 18 51.7 53.8 59.2 58.3 70.4 70.5 63.2 57.6 32.3 n/a 41.9 n/a 39.2 61.4 34.8 19 54.0 53.9 60.5 55.8 71.0 68.81 61.4 54.1 1 27.0 n/a n/a n/a 47.9 61.3 40.3 20 54.4 53.5 1 63.3 57.71 73.1 71.3 68.2 58.3 36.3 n/a n/a 33.9 36.7 60.3 1 43.9 21 56.1 57.9 62.2 59.8 69.1 69.3 58.2 59.0 39.6 n/a 43.6 »/a 59.0 65.7 60.8 22 54.6 55.8 59.7 60.4 73.4 72.7 69.8 62.2 36.7 nia n/a 29.9 36.2 62.1 47.8 23 54.3 52.5 60.9 61.5 74.9 71.1 68.8 58.5 n/a ji/a n/a 36.9 31.7 60.4 34.5 24 56.5 58.1 65.1 61.2 71..4 70.4 63.8 55.2 n/a 30.0 n/a 34.6 56.2 63.1 56.9 25 55.6 53.5 54.9 60.7 72.4 72.0 65.7 57.8 29.3 n/a n/a n/a 36.5 58.8 32.4 26 53.5 55.6 59.9 59.0 72.7 71.4 62.3 59.0 36.9 n/a n/a n/a 51.0 65.1 53.4 27 57.8 59.4 66.6 60.3 70.6 67.0 40.8 26.0 32.0 41.0 39.8 33.9 58.9 65.5 59.6 28 59.2 60.7 66.9 63.7 70.9 69.2 44.6 48.8 28.4 28.5 n/a 36.7 57.2 65.2 59.1 Mo. Ldn 54.8 55.8 62.0 59.9 71.9 71.5 65.3 58.7 38.3133.01 38.2 34.3151.31 62.1 53.4 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 33 sc%v Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dBA February 2006 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #16 #17 #18 4191 #20 #21 422 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29 1 67.5 52.4 50.3 50.0 1 49.0 n/a 59.1. 54.3 63.4 45.1 48.7 70.8 62.5 68.4 2 69.1 29.4 55.7 52.8 48.5 1 52.2 60.1 66.1 63.3 54.6 56.5 61.8 64.6 57.5 3 67.9 46.1 44.5 35.3 49.4 39.6 57.8 52.4 62.3 42.8 47.1 58.6 60.9 56.3 4 64.3 28.8 39.0 33.5 38.1 44.9 55.3 48.0 58.5 39.3 40.5 60.21 58.0 53.7 5 64.5 46.6 37.4 27.0 46.3 37.4 53.5 43.8 57.5 34.0 40.6 60.3 57.4 52.2 6 64.4 43.0 144.7 43.5 1 36.6 33.6 50.2 48.2 55.8 45.5 36.2 57.6 57.9 53.3 7 63.3 39.7 52.5 48.0 47.4 45.9 52.4 56.4 56.4 37.5 48.2 56.0 61.7 52.9 8 64.01 52.0 52.1 49.5 52.8 45.7 53.6 53.9 57.5 44.9 47.1. 58.9 60.0 52.9 9 67.8 45.8 55.7 53.4 49.2 48.7 58.4 63.7 62.5 53.1. 52.1 57.1 61.1 55.8 10 67.7 33.8 37.0 34.8 38.7 n/a 60.1 53.1 62.3 50.8 65.3 63.2 60.6 55.1 11 65.6 36.3 40.8 28.1 45.0 37.4 57.3 47.8 59.4 42.6 46.8 60.1 60.1 53.1 12 64.3 n/a 42.6 50.1 39.6 38.9 56.0 46.1 58.7 43.61 45.1 65.0 57.7 55.2 13 65.8 58.1 47.4 49.9 60.2 47.5 57.2 54.8 .60.4 49.5 50.9 61.8 61.7 59.3 14 67.0 45.4 3 8. 31 31.8 49.5 34.6 58.9 58.2 62.0 49.8 49.5 57.6 60.4 59.0 15 64.8 46.0 49.7 49.4 47.2 41.7 54.4 33.8 58.3 38.9 42.2 57.6 58.0 54.7 16 66.4 46.1 38.3 35.4 50.2 45.8 54.2 42.3 58.2 49.7 41.4 61.3 60.3 53.9 17 68.1 55.7 45.1 45.1 54.2 48.6 56.9 49.2 58.1. 40.6 49.3 60.7 62.5 59.9 18 67,6 40.1 n/a 30.5 37.7 43.8 55.8 50.6 58.9 37.3 44.5 55.7 55.7 53.3 19 66.3 40.8 28.2 40.0 44.8 41.9 54.2 48.4 59.2 41.6 47.2 57.7 54.2 52.3 20 65.7 n/a 40.1 35.7 48.8 38.4 56.5 51.0 59.9 43.2 46.8 59.6 61.3 58.1 21 68.9 40.8 54.1 51.8 42.4 53.8. 57.7 68.0 62.7 56.4 59.0 56.4 57.4 54.0 22 67.5 47.8 53.5 53.9 51.9 36.1 59.4 54.5 62.2 52.8 47.8 63.3 62.8 59.3 23 65.9 45.6 46.3 45.8 ! 46.0 31.3 57.5 44.9 60.5 42.3 41.8 63.2 62.5 56.3 24 67.9 42.3 53.4 46.6 50.9 57.1 63.2 60.8 50.6 58.8 55.8 62.1 54.1 25 64.9 38.5 J42 39.8 46.5 43.0 55.1 34.9 58.4 46.2 42.2 59.5 59.5 51.8 26 65.5 36.7 47.0 38.3 46.3 58.6 59.4 61.5 45.2 51.5 62.9 59.5 54.1. 27 68.7 38.6 56.4 54.7 38.7 51.8 57.5 65.4 61..7' 54.6 60.2 39.9 59.4 n/a 28 65.9 47.6 56.5 54.1 47.9 54.5 55.8 65.4 60.3 58.2 59.1 38.5 58.1 34.8 Mo. Ldn 66..6 48.2 5.0.9 49..1 49.9 47.2 57.0 59.6 60S 50.2 54.8 61.5 60.5 57.7 34 A Product oftheMetropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Analysis of Aircraft Noise ]vents - Aircraft Ldn dBA February 2006 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #30 31 #32 333435 36 37 38 f39 1 48.0 50.0 27.7 26.2 26.0 50.1 48.7 n1a n/a nla 2 61.3 41.1 50.0 54.7 52.1 53.7 51.2 48.1 50.9 49.7 3 47.2 46.1 27.6 n/a 28.8 49.9 52.2 38.6 28.3 n/a 4 46.5 38.4 51.3 48.0 42.5 49.3 51.0 40.3 40.5 32.6 5 45.3 41.8 37.7 39.8 38.9 48.8 50.4 41.7 31.8 1 28.7 6 44.9 34.4 47.0 n/a n/a 1 49.2 50.4 29.8 n,/a n a 7 59.7 41.0 n/a 46.1 46.2 51.8 52.0 44.0 45.1 40.2 8 56.9 42.91 32.2 48.0 38.7 48.51 50.1 43.4 45.1 43.3 9 60.4 46.8 43.9 52.5 45.7 46.7 43.1 46.1 50.6 45.6 10 48.2 26.2 25.21 28.1 27.8 50.3 52.6 n/a n/a 27.7 11 47.7 37.7 40.9 n/a n/a 50.3 52.3 n/a n/a n/a 12 55.3 n/a rv'a 43.4 36.5 50.1 51.9 n/a 40.1 25.3 13 48.6 50.4 55.2 45.0 40.0 52.3 53.1 39.4 n/a n/a 14 46.7 42.0 40.3 29.4 32.8 1 51.3 51.5 41.8 n/a n/a 15 59.3 50.9 39.4 51.2 42.4 47.0 50.1 n/a n/a 39.7 16 46.4 47.7 n/a 46.0 36.1 49.4 51.3 n/a nVa n/a 17 54.0 54.7 42.3 45.8 41.3 55.2 57.0 45.9 n/a 36.0 18 43.8 37.9 n/a 38.5 n/a 47.4 50.1 35.3 n/a n/a 19 44.7 47.8 41.6 1 n/a 36.4 49.1 49.3 1 43.1 n/a n/a 20 50.6 35.7 42.2 33.5 31.1 51.7 52.4 26.8 n/a 29.5 21 60.2 47.0 43.7 49.3 47.9 51.4 46.4 47.7 49.7 49.4 22 59.3 49.3 50.2 48.6 46.7 56.1 55.3 38.4 33.2 n/a 23 50.7 49,01 40.3 28.5 27.6 50.0 51.4 40.0 n/a 41.3 24 61.0 49.0 49.2 52.1 48.3 52.1 1 51.7 48.3 51.0 48.1 25 45.1 36.3 n/a 39.7 1 27.4 48.1 49.1 39.6 41.9 36.4 26 56.3 37.8 46.6 46.3 46.0 49.6 51.2 43.7 42.8 42.2 27 62.6 44.7 1-1/a 53.1 48.3 47.5 46.7 50.1 51.7 48.4 28 61.1 1 51.7 32.9 52.8 49.2 49.1 41.1 48.3 49.6 Mo. Ldn 56.6 47.0 45.5 47.8 44.0 50.9 51.4 43.4 44.7' �4t28 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANO S Program 35 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport asp *This report is for in f rmational purposes only and cannot be used for enforcement purposes. 1227 Carrier Jets Departed Runway 17 - 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006 . . . . '_4 ell, Sad r ! -' N., II._. 7 35 U3 tal- M!, _:pr . . . . XX .... Runway 17 Departure Overflight GridAnalysis Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 0210112006-02128I2006 so Runwav 17 Carrier Jet Der)arture Ouerations - 02/01/2006-02/28/2006 0 1217 (99.2%) West Bound Carrier Jet -A"' 10 (0.8%) Carrier Jet Departure Departure Operations Flying the Runway 17 Jet Operations Turned West Before Passing Over the 'Departure Procedure (Passing Over the 2.5 NM Runway 17 2.5 NM Turn Point. This is 1.6% of 612 Turn Point) and Runway 17 East Bound Carrier Jet westbound departures. Departure Operation ' west S�1k: ��1E lit-,aig m:� Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport Gate Plot Runway 17 Departures That Turned West Be#ore 2.5NM Turn Point 02101/2006 00:00:00 - 02/2812006 23:59:59 10 Tracks Crossed Gate: Lef#=0(0%), Right= 20(100%) 18uG 0 1100 0 * l000 O m O U. y O 0 � Ssoi au m g :2� a 110. a 0 90D Q ON -1.2 -1A .2 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0,0 0 0.4 0.5 0,8 1.0 1.2 (Runway End) (Corridor End) Deviation From Center or Gate (MOes) r0+err Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 0210112006-0212812006 -2- Minneapolis-St. 2 - 5 ' west S�1k: ��1E lit-,aig m:� Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport Gate Plot Runway 17 Departures That Turned West Be#ore 2.5NM Turn Point 02101/2006 00:00:00 - 02/2812006 23:59:59 10 Tracks Crossed Gate: Lef#=0(0%), Right= 20(100%) 18uG 0 1100 0 * l000 O m O U. y O 0 � Ssoi au m g :2� a 110. a 0 90D Q ON -1.2 -1A .2 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0,0 0 0.4 0.5 0,8 1.0 1.2 (Runway End) (Corridor End) Deviation From Center or Gate (MOes) r0+err Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 0210112006-0212812006 -2- Minneapolis-St. 2 - Runway 17 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006 EF1.swigF�;il :v.�ssPsivaa �,, Men I � a � �� rt r Surrfr=h Lai *1✓�"' _ �;;1 � "`_?`""'� a a `�,� �� �� ...j:. f _ .- .. It S l KF ffL Mp f 1 t s 3 F,i j[s I Fr j �L s 1�{fo,94 �Svi FAKE � � � . ..� —• 1 . t t r , sg tT.- ley Wl IA r� 0 Nightime Carrier Jet Departure Operations off of Runway 17 in 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006 (10:30 p.m.-6:00a.m.) 0 (0%) West Bound Carrier Jet 0 (0%) West Bound Carrier Jet Departures Turned West Between 2.5 and 3.0 NM Departures Turned West After 3.0 NM from Start of from Start of Takeoff and Remained Over the Takeoff and Remained Over the Minnesota River Minnesota River Valley (trending with Runway 17 Valley (trending with Runway 17 River Departure River Departure Heading) I Procedure) �'� 0 (0%) Carrier Jet Departures Turned_ 0 (0%) Remaining West Bound Carrier West Before Passing Over the Runway 17 2.5 NM Jet Departures Flew the Runway, 17 Jet Departure Turn Point Procedure (Passing Over the 2.5 NM Turn Point), and with an enroute heading to the destination airport Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 02/01/2006-0212612006 -3- 5? 3- Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations Runway 17-35 RMT's Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 0210112006-0212812006 -4- G9 4-G9 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Levels - DNL dBA 02/01/2006-02/28/2006 Date #30 #31 2 433 #34 #35 1 .#36 #37 #38 #39 1 48 50 E27.7 26.2 26 50.1 48.7 NA NA NA 2 61.3 41.1 50 54.7 52.1 53.7 51.2 48.1 50.9 49.7 3 47.2 46.1 27.6 NA 28.8 49.9 52.2 38.6 28.3 NA 4 46.5 38.4 51.3 48 42.5 49.3 51 40.3 40.5 32.6 5 45.3 41.8 37.7 39.8 38.9 48.8 L50,L 41.7 31.8 28.7 6 44.9 34.4 47 NA NA 49.2 50.4 29.8 NA NA 7 59.7 41 NA 46.1 46.2 51.8 52 44 45.1 40.2 8 56.9 42.9 32.2 48 38.7 48.5 50.1 43.4 45.1 43.3 9 60.4 46.8 43.9 52.5 ' 45.7 46.7 43.1 46.1 50.6 45.6 10 48.2 26.2 25.2 28.1 27.8 50.3 52.6 NA NA 27.7 11 47.7 37.7 40.9 NA NA 50.3 52.3 NA NA NA 12 55.3 NA NA 43.4 136.5 50.1 51.9 NA 40.1 25.3 13 48.6 50.4 55.2 45 ' 40 52.3 53.1 39.4 1 NA NA 14 46.7 42 40.3 29.4 32.8 51.3 51.5 41.8 NA NA 15 59.3 50.9 39.4 51.2 42.4 47 50.1 NA NA 39.7 16 46.4 47.7 NA 46 36.1 49.4 51.3 NA NA NA 17 54 54.7 42.3 45.8 41.3 55.2 57 45.9 NA 36 18 43.8 37.9 NA 38.5 A NA 47.4 50.1 35.3 NA NA 19 44.7 47.8 41.6 NA LHA 49.1 49.3 43.1 j NA NA 20 50.6 35.7 42.2 33.5 31.1 51.7 52.4 26.8 NA 29.5 21 60.2 47 43.7 49.3 ' 47.9 51.4 46.4 47.7 49.7 49.4 22 59.3 49.3 50.2 48.6 46.7 56.1 55.3 38.4 33.2 NA 23 50.7 49 40.3 28.5 27.6 50 51.4 40 NA 41.3 24 61 49 49.2 52.1 1 48.3 52.1 51.7 48.3 51 48.1 25 45.1 36.3 NA 39.7 27.4 48.1 49.1 39.6 41.9 36.4 26 56.3 37.8 46.6 46.3 46 49.6 51.2 43.7 42.8 42.2 27 62.6 44.7 NA 53.1 48.3 4_7.5 46.7 50.1 ' 51.7 48.4 28 61.1 51.7 32.9 52.8 49.2 49.1 41.1 f 48.3 49.649.7 Av. DNL 56.6 '. 47 45.5 47.8 44 50.9 51.4 d 43.4 44.7 42.8 Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 0210112006-0212812006 -5- Do 5- Do Community Vs. Aircraft Noise Levels D N L d BA 02/01/2006-02/28/2006 RMT Community DNL Community DNL Community DNL *Aircraft DNL 30 02/01/03-02/28/03 57.2 02/01/04-02/28/04 56.1 02101/05-02/28/05 57.9 02/01/2006-02/28/2006 56.6 31 58 57.5 58.1 47 32 56.4 55.2 57 45.5 33 53.5 53.1 54.7 47.8 34 57.3 57 57,7 44 35 59.8 59.1 60.8 50.9 36 59.5 59.1 61.5 51.4 37 64.1 61.8 63.6 43.4 38 59.2 59.8 y� _59.3 44.7 39 60.3 61.4 60.3 42.8 Top 15 Runway 17 Departure Destination Report Airport City Heading (deg.) #O.ps l Percent of Total Ops PHX PHOENIX 231' 47 3.8% DFW STL DALLAS/ FORT WORTH ST LOUIS 193' 160' 47 39 3.8% 3.2% IAH HOUSTON 185' 32 2.6% LAS LAS VEGAS 243' 30 2.4% DEN DENVER 237' 29 2.4% ATL ATLANTA 149' 29 2.4% MCO ORLANDO 151' 22 1.8% MDW CHICAGO (MIDWAY) 124' 22. 1.8% MEM MEMPHIS 162' 20 1.6% IND INDIANAPOLIS 134° 17 1.4% MCI KANSAS CITY 188' 15 1.2% ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 124' 15 1.2% SAN SAN DIEGO_ 235' 13 1.1% LNK LINCOLN 208' 13 1.1% Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 02/0112006-0212612006 -6- . if I 6- ifI MEMORANDUM ITEM 3 TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E. Leqve, Manager — Aviation Noise &Satellite Programs SUBJECT: EVALUATION / PRIORITIZATION OF PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES DATE: March 1, 2006 One of the elements included in the 2006 NOC Work Plan is the evaluation, prioritization and coordination of Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) noise mitigation and land use measures. At the July 28, 2005 NOC meeting the Committee reviewed the land use measures in the November 2004 Part 150 Update NCP focusing on preventative land use measures reviewing community airport noise planning and related land use development practices. This memorandum reviews/evaluates the Noise Abatement Measures included in the November 2004 Part 150 Update NCP detailing the status/priority of the respective measures. By way of background, 14 C.F.R. Part 150 provides a framework for airport operators to develop a comprehensive noise plan for an airport in the form of an NCP. A Part 150 NCP is comprised of two fundamental approaches to addressing noise impacts around an airport, (1) Land Use Measures, and (2) Noise Abatement Measures (operational measures to reduce noise). A key component of Part 150 program planning is the development of a five-year forecast Noise Exposure Map (NEM), commonly referred to as a noise contour. Noise contours outline the areas eligible for Land Use Measures (compatible land use plans, property acquisition, residential relocation and sound mitigation). In addition, Noise Abatement Measures (airport use, aircraft operations and airspace usage amendments) can be pursued via a Part 150 program. The manner in which an airport is operated and aircraft procedures are executed have a direct effect on the noise impact around an airport. As a result, operational procedures contained in a Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) can have a direct effect on the shape and size of the NEM The 2004 Part 150 Update resulted in a comprehensive Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) recommendation. In addition to several land use measures around MSP, the NCP includes provisions for several operational Wise Abatement Measures. The aircraft and airport operational noise abatement initiatives focus on: ♦ Aircraft Operation Procedures ♦ Runway Use ♦ Departure and Arrival Flight Tracks ♦ Voluntary Operational Agreements With the Airlines ♦ Provisions for Further Evaluation of Technology As a result of the extensive analyses and review that was included in the 2004 MSP Part 150 Update, 17 Noise Abatement (NA) lVbasures are included in the Part 150 Update NCP. The following information summarizes the noise mitigation measures including those that were unchanged from the previous MSP Part 150 program, new measures and existing Part 150 measures that were modified slightly for inclusion in the update. f as NA -1. MSP Airport Noise Oversight Committee — This modified measure recommends that MAC establish a successor organization for the now defunct MASAC. The MSP Airport Noise Oversight Committee would provide a balanced forum for interested parties to consider noise mitigation initiatives in the context of benefit, feasibility, and fiscal considerations. NA -2. Noise Management Program - This modified measure would require MAC to consider incentives and disincentives to reduce the impact of aviation noise in the surrounds of MSP. NA -3. Voluntary Nighttime Limits on Flights - This measure proved effective to reduce nighttime flights of Stage 2 aircraft. This measure is modified to reflect the revised MSP nighttime hours of 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., and to ask airlines to reduce the use of hushkit aircraft during the nighttime. NA -4. Nighttime Powerbacks - All airlines at MSP have agreed to eliminate "powerbacks" during nighttime hours. All nighttime flights will "push back" from the gate with an aircraft tug. (No change from the current program) NA -5. Engine Run -Up Field Rule - All airlines are required to conduct maintenance run -ups at a designated run-up pad, and comply with the MSP Run -Up Field Rule. (No change from the current program) NA -6. Training Restriction - The major carriers at MSP have agreed not to conduct training operations (e.g., touch-and-go operations) at MSP. (No change from the current program) NA -7. Operating Procedures - Airlines operating at MSP have agreed to comply with airport operating procedures. This measure is modified to reflect the use of the Distant Noise Abatement Departure Profile (NADP) on all runway ends. NA -8. Measures to Encourage Use of Manufactured. Stage 3 Aircraft - The 1993 Part 150 study established the Noise Surcharge/Differential Landing Fee to recover some of the. costs of noise monitoring and mitigation measures from the airlines. This modified measure would require the MAC to develop and implement measures to encourage aircraft operators to use manufactured Stage 3 aircraft. NA -9. Runway Use System (RUS) - This measure prioritizes noise -sensitive runway selection. This measure is modified to include Runway 17-35 in the runway selection prioritization. NA 10. Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS) - ANOMS continues to be a vital tool for collecting operational data on aircraft movements. (No change from the current program) NA -1 1. Noise Abatement Sensitivity Training - MAC works with the airlines and ATC to encourage awareness of noise issues and to help increase compliance with current noise abatement procedures. (No change from the current program) IP6 NA -12. Low -Demand Flight Tracks — This measure would designate certain flight tracks, by runway end, for preferred use during low -demand time periods. (New Measure) NA -13. Runway 17 Departure 2.5 Nautical Mile (NM) Turn Point Procedure - This measure would reduce noise exposure for homes in the immediate vicinity of the departure runway end by delaying westbound jet aircraft turns until they are over the Minnesota River area. (New Measure) NA -14. Runway 17 River Departure Procedure - This measure would establish a published procedure to route departing jet aircraft over the Minnesota River area when conditions allow. (New Measure) NA -15. Runway 17 Departure River Heading Flight Track - This measure would route departing jet aircraft over the Minnesota River area when conditions allow. (New Measure) NA 16. Runway 35 River Visual Approach Procedure - This measure would recommend that MAC and the FAA investigate a visual arrival procedure to Runway 35 that routes arriving aircraft over the Minnesota River, in order to reduce noise exposure and overflights of areas north and south of the river. (New Measure) NA- 17. Future Technology and Global Positioning System (GPS) Initiatives - This measure would recommend that MAC and the FAA investigate the potential use of emerging GPS technologies for noise mitigation purposes, and implement beneficial procedures as necessary. (New Measure) The development, modification and/or continuation of the various measures listed above are a result of thorough review of both existing and new measures as part of the update process. The following information provides additional analysis/explanation of measures that are new, and/or were extensively reviewed as part of the update process. Noise Abatement Departure Profiles A Noise Abatement Departure Profile (NADP) is a complex set of procedures that a pilot follows to control the way that an aircraft climbs away from an airport during takeoff. The procedures deal with the pitch of the aircraft, as well as power and flap settings. In the early 1990s, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) conducted several studies to develop standardized departure profiles to minimize aircraft noise. The intention was to provide standardized departure profiles for all airports around the country. Prior to standardization, NADPs were developed on an airport -specific basis — resulting in a variety of intricate profiles that posed a risk of compromising the pilot's attention to cockpit details, traffic avoidance and other associated safety functions. Under the FAA standardized rules, there are two departure profiles that airport operators can implement to reduce aircraft noise around airports. Each procedure is outlined providing acceptable criteria for speed, thrust settings and airplane configurations associated with two NADPs (Close -In and Distant profiles). The Close4n Departure Profile is Intended to reduce noise impacts for communities within approximately 3.5 miles (from the start of takeoff roll) of the airport. The other NADP, the Distant Departure Profile, is intended to provide noise reduction for all other noise sensitive areas beyond the 3.5 -mile area. When an airport operator selects a departure profile, air carriers are required to implement the selected NADP for use on the specified runways. In parallel runway situations, such is the case at MSP, the same procedure must be used when departing in the same direction off the parallel runways. 4y Noise Abatement Departure Profile Recommendation: One of the major aircraft operational procedures providing noise reduction as included in the Part 150 Update (NA -7), is the implementation of the Distant Noise Abatement Departure Profile for all runways at MSP. The use of the Distant " -�- Departure Profile off "Ift Runway 17 is consistent with the procedures modeled in _ � •�'� � � �, ��- the Environmental i Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for the development of that r>ab runway. The resulting change is over the South Minneapolis area where historically the Close -In Departure Profile was used on Runways 30L and 30R. Use of the Distant v .T=�NADP on all Runways f r ` IF.- '' ` ' at MSP reduces the population within the Figure 1: Close -In vs. Distant NADP impacts within the 2007 Unmitigated Contour 2007 Unmitigated 60+ DNL by 7,707 people and 3,343 dwellings as compared to the use of the Close -in NADP on all runways. The decision to implement the Distant Departure Profile on all runways, through the Part 150 Update process, was a result of significant review and analysis by the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC), local governments, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) and MAC's consultant, HNTB. Consistent with the authority granted to airport operators as part of the FAA's NADP Advisory Circular (AC 91-53A) provisions, implementation of the procedure was pursued by the NOC and the Distant NADP was implemented on all Runways at MSP in July 2003. Runway 17 Departure Flight Tracks The introduction of Runway 17-35 in October 2005 changed the dynamics of the noise environment around MSP. This is especially significant when generating noise contours and a Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) as part of a Part 150 Update predicated on airport operations in 2007. As part of the review process for Runway 17-35 the Dual -Track FEIS and Record of Decision (ROD) stated that noise abatement measures could evaluate departure tracks off Runway 17 in an effort to avoid populated areas in close proximity to MSP, specifically in Bloomington. Pursuant -to that initiative, MASAC investigated departure flight track options off Runway 17 through the Part 150 Update process. The FEIS contained a series of proposed flight tracks off Runway 17 that included tracks "A" through "G", which provided a 1900 heading fan from 950 clockwise to 2850. Using these tracks as a starting. point, MASAC began an evaluation of possible flight track options off Runway 17. Throughout the process consideration was given to procedures that provide sufficient guidance to ensure that aircraft of varying performance capabilities could avoid, as much as possible, populated areas while en route to their destinations. &,S— The goals relative to the Runway 17 departure flight track analysis were as follows: ♦ Reduce noise impacts within the 60+ DNL contour ♦ Avoid increased overflights of other communities ♦ Maintain runway capacity ♦ Ensure feasible implementation by FAA/Air Traffic Control ♦ Provide positive guidance to aircraft so they can reasonably follow desired flight tracks ♦ Allow for possible future transition to Flight Management System (FMS)/Global Positioning System (GPS) navigation With the above goals as the comerstone of the evaluation efforts, several options were discussed. The options included varying departure track fan concentrations ranging from a 600 fan (headings from 1400 to 2000) to a full 1900 fan (headings from 095° to 2850). These various scenarios also included the proposed deletion of FEIS modeled tracks, in some cases, to accommodate the various departure fan ranges. As a result of the extensive analyses conducted by the MASAC Operations Committee and the Runway 17-35 City Group, a proposal was developed that addressed the areas west and east of runway heading (1700) uniquely relative to the existing land uses on either side of runway heading. Runway 17 Departure Flight Track Recommendation: After significant review, MASAC recommended that operations which have initial departure headings east of runway heading (headings ranging from 950 to 1700) should initiate their turns as soon as possible when departing Runway 17. This recommendation was made due to the fact that there is no one flight path considered "better' than another when abparting to the southeast over the existing residentially developed areas. This is consistent with the FEIS documentation for Runway 17. When conducting the same evaluation for departure headings west of runway centerline (headings from 1700 to 2850) two main considerations arose: (1) Heavily residential developed areas exist west of runway heading almost immediately off the runway end and (2) the Minnesota River Valley south of the airport offers an area where departure operations could overfly at higher altitudes in an effort to reduce residential overflight impacts close -in to the airport. As a result of the deliberations, a delayed turn point off runway heading (1700) for westbound jet departures offered a solution that not only reduced the number of residents within the 2007 60 DNL Mitigated Contour but was also feasible for implementation according to the FAA's airspace management criteria. 0 As a result of evaluations and comprehensive input from MASAC, the- MASAC Operations Committee and the Runway 17-35 City Group, the recommended Runway 17 departure tracks include departure turns as soon as possible for departures east of _ Pmpo"d NAA3. Optwft 7- 1700 to 950 and a 2.5 Ru yj 17 2.5, KV Tam Paul! nautical mile (from the start of takeoff) tum point, at which time jet departure operations would turn from runway heading (170°) K to westbound departure headings .4 between 170° and 2850. The procedure = z• -'- results in a reduction of 4,349 people and 1,926 dwellings within the 60+ DNL contour U (the population change, . values are relative to MFarrr il.\s t!t lrri IRI�r■ t .,.+ 1 a si. PC-�7 the 2007 Unmitigated Contour). • Figure 2 Runway 17 departure tracks with a 2.5 nautical mile tum point In an effort to ensure that the procedure was approved for implementation, in 2002 the MAC initiated an Environmental Assessment (EA) of the procedure to gain FAA approval for procedure implementation concurrently with the opening of Runway 17/35. After completion of the EA, which included open houses and a public hearing on the proposed procedure, on August 27, 2003 the FAA issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)/Record of Decision (ROD) approving the procedure for implementation concurrent with the runway opening. The Runway 17 2.5 Nautical Mile (NM) Departure Procedure was implemented on October 27, 2005, the day Runway 17/35 opened at MSP. Runway Use System - The implementation of a Runway'Use System (RUS) as a noise mitigation element at an airport can provide additional noise reduction benefits as part of an airport's overall operational philosophy. An effective RUS, when approached from the perspective of aircraft overflight noise reduction, can solidify runway use selections that minimize residential overflights around an airport while at the same time maximizing the use of existing compatible land uses. The challenge of successful RUS implementation is striking a balance between runway use for the purpose of maintaining safe and expedient operations into and out of an airport with minimizing the noise impact on surrounding residential areas. Through the process of reviewing possible noise mitigation measures contained in the Part 150 Update NCP, the MASAC Operations Committee reviewed the possibility of mplementing a revised RUS. The evaluation encompassed several analyses. Implementation of a RUS is predicated on several variables including the following: ♦ Weather and wind conditions ♦ Safety ♦ Capacity and flow requirements 47 ♦ Traffic demand ♦ Aircraft separation ♦ Pilot compliance ♦ Air Traffic Control (ATC) Through evaluation of these variables, several specific factors were discovered relative to runway use at MSP. The selection of runways at MSP is determined primarily by wind and driven by capacity requirements. This results in limited options to significantly change runway use, especially during the daytime hours where capacity drives the runway use determinations. Conversely, the nighttime hours provide a period where RUS implementation is a distinct possibility. To further quantify the times of available RUS utilization, HNTB conducted an analysis that assessed daily operations at the airport based on an average annual week. The average annual week was analyzed in 15 -minute segments to determine periods of low, medium and high operational demand. It was determined that during times of high -demand (greater than 15 operations in a 15 -minute period) runway use would be largely dictated by the wind and capacity requirements. During periods of medium (between 3.5 and 15 operations in a 15 -minute period) and low (3.5 or less operations in a 15 - minute period) traffic demands, a RUS for the express purpose of noise reduction could be implemented to a higher degree. ProoOSed Runwav Use Svstem: The MASAC Operations Committee reviewed various RUS options for implementation during low, medium and high operational periods at MSP. The result was the development of a • Figure 3: MSP runway configuration and runway use terminology RUS that could be implementedduring the low and a portion of the medium operational time periods at MSP. It was assumed that tse of the capacity -driven RUS outlined in the Dual -Track Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) would be used during high -demand periods. The RUS included in the Part 150 Update NCP is as follows: Departures (In order of priority) 1. Runways 12L and 12R 2. Runway 17 3. Balanced use of Runway 4/22 4. Runways 30L and 30R Arrivals (In order of priority) 1. Runways 30L and 30R 2. Runway 35 3. Balanced use of Runway 4/22 4. Runways 12L and 12R, Departure preferences are separate and distinct from arrival preferences. Since departures are noisier than arrivals, ATC first selects the departure runway and then selects the appropriate arrival runway. The preferences apply equally for daytime and nighttime operations. ATC may use head-to- head operational procedures in the Corridor and on Runway 17-35, as needed. By using the proposed preferred RUS departure runway priorities of 12's, 17, 22, 04 and 30's and arrival runway priorities of 30's, 35, 04, 22 and 12's, the proposal results in a reduction of 1,406 people and 649 dwellings within the 60+ DNL contour (the population change values are relative to the 2007 Unmitigated Contour). The Runway 17 2.5 Nautical Mile (NM) Turn Point Departure Procedure EA included an evaluation of the RUS as the assumed runway use with Runway 17/35 in operation. The EA analysis concluded that there would be no significant adverse. noise impacts with the implementation of the RUS. On August 27, 2003 the FAA issued a FONSI/ROD approving the Runway 17 departure procedure with the RUS assumptions for implementation concurrent with the runway opening. River Departure and Arrival Flight Tracks In an effort to further utilize the compatible land use that the Minnesota River Valley offers south of MSP, consideration was given to specific procedures that would maximize the overflight of the river valley for departures off Runway 17 and arrivals on Runway 35. Through significant evaluation, and with input from the FAA, three options were developed. Recommended River Departure and Arrival Flight Tracks: As a result of the mentioned analysis, two Runway 17 river departure measures and one Runway 35 river arrival measure were incorporated into the Part 150 Update. The three procedures include a published river departure procedure, river heading departure flight track and a visual river approach procedure. Runway 17 - River Departure Procedure: This procedure would be implemented via a published departure procedure for Runway 17. It is intended to route Runway 17 departure operations over the Minnesota River Valley, avoiding residential areas. The procedure would direct aircraft to fly a straight-out heading of 1700 until reaching a turn point located three nautical miles from the start of takeoff roll. At that point, the aircraft would turn to a heading of 2450 to overfly the river. This procedure is intended for aircraft departing to the south and west of the airport. Because of the capacity impact this procedure poses during mid and high traffic demand time at the airport; this procedure would most likely only be used during low -demand time periods. This Would equate to typical procedural use between the hours of 12:15 a.m. and 5:30 a.m. The Runway 17 2.5 Nautical Mile (NM) Turn Point Departure Procedure EA included the evaluation of the Runway 17 River Departure Procedure in combined use with the 2.5 NM Turn Point Procedure. On August 27, 2003 the FAA issued a FONSI/ROD approving the Runway 17 2.5 NM Tum Point Departure Procedure with the Runway 17 River Departure Procedure for implementation concurrent with the runway opening. n Runway 17— Departure River Heading Flight Track: This procedure designates the 2300 heading as a river heading, when used in conjunction with the 2.5 nautical mile tum departure fan off Runway 17. The 2300 heading (Track L) routes aircraft over the river valley. Because this procedure is not a published procedure, and not part of a flight plan, the heading can be assigned by the Air Traffic Control Tower as part of the takeoff clearance. This would allow for the procedure to be used at any time when the FAA personnel in the Air Traffic Control Tower can work it into the traffic flow. This procedure is intended for aircraft departing to the south and west of the airport. The Runway 17 2.5 Nautical Mile (NM) Turn Point Departure Procedure EA included the evaluation of the Runway 17 River Heading Departure Flight Track in combined use with the 2.5 NM Tum Point Procedure. On August 27, 2003 the FAA issued a FONSI/ROD approving the Runway 17 2.5 NM Turn Point Departure Procedure with the Runway 17 Departure River Heading Flight Track for implementation concurrent with the runway opening. Runway 35 — River Visual Approach Procedure: This procedure considers a visual river approach to Runway 35 that routes arriving aircraft over the river valley. The purpose of this procedure is to reduce aircraft arrival overflights of residential areas. Aircraft using this procedure would approach from the southwest, flying a 650 heading over the river. As the aircraft nears the airport, it would turn on to final approach and align with Runway 35. Several issues need to be resolved prior to implementation of this procedure, including airspace design, Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) concurrence and flight testing. Also, additional analysis would be required to determine if the procedure could be safely used at night. Low -Demand Flight Tracks In an effort to reduce noise impacts during low -demand periods the MASAC Operations Committee endorsed preferred departure tracks for runways 30L, 121J12R, 04, 22 and 17. The intent of this initiative was to determine flight track priorities and procedures for use by Air Traffic Control (ATC), which would minimize the impacted population, for use during low -demand periods. Low -Demand Flight Track Recommendation: In order to establish the best low -demand flight tracks for each runway, HNTB used DC9 hushkit, 90 dBA SEL contours to measure impact. The resultant proposal does not significantly detour aircraft from their destination and is intended to give ATC guidance on selection of appropriate flight tracks during low -demand periods producing the least amount of noise impact on residents. This does not negate deviation from these tracks for the purposes of safety,. air- craft performance, pilot compliance, weather and traffic conflicts. Below are the recommenda- tions by runway. Runway 04 ♦ Heading 355 -degrees - Flight Track C. This heading directs aircraft over Fort Snelling, the Mississippi River, and industrial land use that border the river. Precise navigation of this route is not possible without external navigation to aid the pilot; therefore, this measure recommends that MAC coordinate with the FAA to develop a Departure Procedure (DP) that overflies the river basin, for use by non -heavy and high performance aircraft. Until the DP is available, the 355 -degree true/353-degree magnetic heading would be used. I%1 Runway 22 ♦ South DP. Also known as the "Cedar Avenue DP," this measure recommends that MAC coordinate with the FAA to develop and implement a GPS/FMS DP that routes departures from Runway 22 east of Cedar Avenue, then southwest over the river. Although this DP has been examined in the past, GPS may allow for its successful implementation. Additionally, since this DP is only intended for use during low -demand periods, it would not affect runway capacity. * West DP. This measure recommends that MAC coordinate with the FAA to explore the potential for a GPS/FMS DP that overflies the 1-494 highway corridor. This DP may not be feasible due to the close proximity of the highway to MSP and the quick turn that would be required for aircraft to follow the DP. Additionally, the potential for disproportionate noise impacts for homes near the 1- 494 highway corridor, as a result of concentrating flights over the highway, would have to be considered prior to implementation. Runway 12L, ♦ Heading 118 -degrees - Flight Track G. This flight track is currently used as a low - demand flight track as part of the Crossing in the Corridor procedure. This measure recommends the continued use of the Crossing in the Corridor procedure. Runway12R ♦ Heading 105 -degrees - Flight Track B. , This flight track is currently used as a low - demand flight track as part of the Crossing in the Corridor procedure. This measure recommends the continued use of the Crossing in the Corridor procedure. Runway 30L ♦ Due to the population density of communities off the departure end of Runway 30L, preferred flight tracks do not provide a noise benefit with existing technology. Designation of specific existing tracks for use during low -demand periods would concentrate flights on selected tracks and disproportionately impact the same people. However, future technology initiatives may allow for development of new routes. ♦ West DP. This measure recommends that MAC coordinate with the FAA to explore the potential for a GPS/FMS DP that overflies the Trunk Highway 62 corridor. This DP may not be feasible due to the close proximityof the highway to MSP and the quick tum that would be required for aircraft to follow the DP. Additionally, the potential for 11 disproportionate noise impacts for homes near the TH 62 highway corridor would have to be considered prior to implementation. Runway 30R ♦ Due to the population density of communities off the departure end of Runway 30R, preferred flight tracks do not provide a noise benefit. Designation of specific tracks for use during low -demand periods would concentrate flights on select tracks and disproportionately impact the same people. Runway17 ♦ Heading 095 -degrees — Flight Track A. Routes aircraft over primarily commercial, industrial, and low density residential areas. ♦ Heading 960 -degrees — Flight Track B. Routes aircraft away from the straigWn arrival flight track. ♦ Heading 185 -degrees — Flight Track D. Routes aircraft away from the straight -in arrival flight track. ♦ Heading 230 -degrees — Flight Track L. Routes aircraft over the Minnesota River area. ♦ River Published DP. Routes aircraft over the Minnesota River area. Runway 35 ♦ Due to the infrequent use of Runway 35 for departures, and the population density of communities off the end of the Runway, preferred flight tracks do not provide a noise benefit. Designation of specific tracks for use during low -demand periods would concentrate flights on select tracks and disproportionately impact the same people. Development of some of the above DPs will require the use of precision navigation technologies such as FMS/GPS. In an effort to implement the above procedures, coordination with the FAA will be paramount in determining the feasibility and implementation options with respect to the proposed DP per runway. The evaluation of new navigation technologies was conducted as part of a GPS Needs Assessment. The Assessment considered the integration of GPS -related applications and technologies at MSP as an element of the Part 150 Update Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) recommendations. Provision for On -Going Evaluations of Global Positioning System (GPS) Technology As part of the development of various mitigation measures for the Part 150 Update, MASAC and the MASAC Operations Committee undertook an evaluation of GPS technology from the perspective of noise reduction around MSP. The evaluation yielded findings that highlighted the need for a national FAA policy relative to GPS technology in concert with national airport and aircraft GPS augmentation in order to fully realize the benefits of GPS technology in helping to enhance noise programs at the nation's airports. GPS Evaluation Recommendation: As a result of the evaluation, it was determined that GPS technology, although available, is not currently at the point of offering immediate noise -reducing aircraft operational enhancements. However, as the technology continues to become integrated into the National Airspace System, future applications could. prove beneficial to enhancing aircraft operational noise reduction initiatives at airports. Therefore, the exploration of GPS/FMS technology to evaluate existing and proposed departure and arrival procedures as a future noise mitigation measure was included as part of the Part 150 Update mitigation program. Voluntary Nighttime Limits on Flights Throughout the Part 150 Update process, the MAC and MAC's consultant (HNTB) worked closely with airlines operating at MSP to compile accurate fleet mix information for the development of the 2007 NEM. As part of this process, extensive evaluations were conducted with regard to the reduction of nighttime operations at MSP. Recommendation for the Voluntary Nighttime Limit on Flights: Several options were evaluated from the perspective of all parties involved. The result of this cooperative effort was approval of a recommended voluntary nighttime agreement with airlines operating at MSP. The agreement would request that airlines operating at MSP limit the operation of aircraft during the nighttime hours of 10:30 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.` Airlines would also agree not to operate or schedule hushkit aircraft during the MSP nighttime hours (10:30 p.m. to 6 a.m.). Special exceptions would apply to operations that occur during the nighttime hours because of emergencies, mechanical problems, Air. Traffic Control delays and weather. Noise analysis showed that the replacement of MSP nighttime hushkit aircraft with manufactured Stage 3 aircraft would reduce the population within the 60 DNL contour by 4,082 people and 1,867 dwellings, relative to the 2007 Unmitigated Contour. Measures to Encourage Use of Manufactured Stage 3 Aircraft Through the many analyses that were conducted throughout the Part 150 Update process, substantial insight was gained relative to the causes of noise impact at MSP. As a result, it is evident that the type of aircraft used at the airport is directly related to the amount of noise energy produced. Recommendation for Measures to Encourage Use of Manufactured Stade 3 Aircraft: Realizing the effect aircraft type has on the noise exposure at MSP, the MASAC Operations Committee and MASAC investigated measures to encourage the use of aircraft that produce less noise and result in lower noise impact. on surrounding communities. The result is a . measure that requires MAC. to develop and implement measures to encourage operators to use manufactured -Stage 3 aircraft (quietest aircraft types among the Stage 3 fleet). The purpose of this measure is to increase the use of manufactured Stage 3 aircraft at MSP. Successful implementation of this measure will reduce the noise impacts associated with the operation of the loudest aircraft at MSP. Noise analysis showed that the replacement of all hushkit aircraft operations with manufactured Stage 3 aircraft would reduce the population within the 60 DNL contour by 17,323 people and 7,379 dwellings, relative to the 2007 Unmitigated Contour. Noise Management Program Noise impact is not a one-dimensional issue; several variables can effect the amount of noise impact communities receive from aircraft operations. In an effort to address all of the possible noise impacts at MSP, the MASAC Operations Committee and MASAC reviewed options that would help address the multiple causes of noise impact at MSP. Noise Management Program Recommendation: The result of MASAC's deliberations was the development of a measure outlining general criteria for the establishment of a Noise Management Program. The measure requires MAC to consider incentives and disincentives to reduce the impact of aviation noise in communities surrounding MSP. The Noise Management Program would consist of voluntary incentives to promote the reduction of noise impacts. These incentives and disincentives would be developed after analysis of their potential benefit to the noise environment. In considering the Noise Abatement Measures outlined in the 2004 Part 150 Update NCP it is important to consider- the status of the respective measures and considerations for future implementation. The following table provides the status of each measure, and in some cases consideration for future implementation. 73 2004 MSP Part 150 NCP Noise Abatement Measures Status and Considerations for Future Implementation Proposed Measure Measure Status Consideration for Future Implementation 1. MSP Airport Noise Implemented First meeting conducted in Oversight Committee June 2003. Continue NOC operations. 2. Noise Management Modification to Existing Process will be initiated Program Measure Not Implemented immediately following NCP approval. Requires MAC coordination with FAA, NOC, and airlines to investigate feasibility and implementation of potential measures. 3. Voluntary Nighttime Modification to Existing Process will be initiated Limits on Flights Measure Not Implemented immediately following NCP approval. Requires MAC coordination with airlines to implement voluntary agreements. 4. Nighttime Powerbacks Implemented Continue existing measure. 5. Engine Run -Up Field Implemented Continue existing measure. Rule An updated MSP Run -Up Filed Rule was approved by the NOC in May 2005 and implemented July 2005 at MSP..The updated field rule ensures continuation of this measure after the integration of Runway 17/35 at MSP. 6. Training Restriction Implemented Continue existing measure. 7. Operating Procedures Implemented Continue Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Procedure; Distant NADP implementation completed in July 2003. 8. Measures to Encourage Modification to Existing Process will be initiated Use of Manufactured Measure Not Implemented immediately following NCP Stage 3 Aircraft approval. Requires MAC coordination with airlines to implement program. 9. Runway Use System Implemented Implemented concurrent with (RUS) opening of Runway 17/35. Revised RUS was assumed in the Runway 17 Departure Procedure EA; FONSI/ROD issued in August 2003. 10. Airport Noise and Implemented Continue existing measure. Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS) 11. Noise Abatement Implemented Continue existing measure. Sensitivity Training Program was enhanced by the NOC in May 2005 with 7q Proposed Measure Measure Status Consideration for Future Implementation the development and implementation of the Pilot Information Program. 12. Low -Demand Flight Not Implemented Process will be initiated Tracks immediately following NCP approval. MAC would request amendment of ATCT standard operating procedures to include measure. FAA reviews, approves, and implements. This measure would require significant FAA review and is dependant on future implementation of specific aircraft navigation technology fleet wide. 13. Runway 17 Departure Implemented EA prepared for flight 2.5 NM Tum Point procedure; FONSI/ROD Procedure issued in August 2003. Procedure was implemented concurrent with opening of Runway 17/35. 14. Runway 17 River Implemented EA prepared for flight Departure Procedure procedure; FONSI/ROD issued in August 2003. Procedure was implemented concurrent with opening of Runway 17/35. 15. Runway 17 Departure Implemented EA prepared for flight River Heading Flight procedure; FONSI/ROD Track issued in August 2003. Procedure was implemented concurrent with opening of Runway 17/35. 16. Runway 35 River Visual Not Implemented Process will be initiated Approach Procedure immediately following NCP approval. Requires MAC coordination with FAA to investigate feasibility and implementation of the measure. 17. Future Technology and. Not Implemented Process will be initiated Global Positioning immediately following NCP System (GPS) Initiatives approval. Requires MAC coordination with FAA to investigate feasibility and implementation of potential measures. This measure would require significant FAA review, a national FAA implementation strategy and is dependant on future implementation of specific Proposed Measure Measure Status 1 Consideration for Future � Implementation aircraft navigation technology fleet wide. Considering the above information, 11 of the total 17 Noise Abatement Measures outlined in the 2004 MSP Part 150 Update NCP have been implemented and are ongoing. Of the remaining six measures, three are modifications of existing NCP measures that were recommended in the 1993 Part 150 Update and three are new measures. The three new measures require significant review and consideration by the FAA via the Part 150 review process underway and likely subsequent environmental analysis consistent with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). At the March 15, 2006 NOC meeting staff will provide a briefing to the Committee covering this topic. 4 Pat Geagan MAYOR Peggy Carlson Cyndee Fields Mike Maguire Meg Tilley COUNCIL MEMBERS Thomas Hedges CITY ADMINISTRATOR MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 651.675.5000 phone 651.675.5012 fax 651.454.8535 TDD MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 651.675.5300 phone -651.675.5360 tax 651.454.8535 TDD rotmi non of EaEd x G. March 16, 2006or Representative Tim Wilkin 551 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Eagan Legislative Delegation: As a community impacted by three runways at MSP International Airport, it is extremely important that the City of Eagan be well represented on the Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC). In order to receive the representation the community deserves, the Eagan. City Council, at the recommendation of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission, would like to get your input and position on two proposed options for changes in how the City's representation on the MAC is determined. As you well know, with the opening of Runway 17/35 in October of 2005 and with the existing operations off of the parallel runways over northeast Eagan, the entire City is now impacted by airport noise to varying extents. Moreover, as the home to Northwest Airlines, Mesaba, and numerous transportation companies that utilize MSP, the aviation industry and the success of MSP is critical to our community. Given both the noise over the community and the value placed on the aviation industry, the City of Eagan's representation on the MAC is of utmost importance to our community. Under current State law, the MAC Commissioners are appointed by the Governor, with the exception of the Commissioners serving the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, who are appointed by their communities' respective Mayors. The City of Eagan is currently represented by BertMcKasy, whose district covers almost all of Dakota County, ranging from the City of Eagan in the north to Sciota Township in the south (see attached map). It has been the City's experience that the positions of our representative on the MAC oftentimes do not reflect the positions of the City of Eagan, particularly as it relates to noise abatement and mitigation. Furthermore, as an appointee by the Governor, our representative rarely, if ever, contacts the City for input on any given decision being brought before the MAC. Given the lack of representation that the City is currently receiving on the MAC, the City is proposing one of two options for changes on the MAC, both of which would require Legislative action. For this reason, the City is seeking your feedback on the proposed changes. www.cityofeagan.com Ot}tion #1 Like the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, the City of Eagan is greatly impacted by MSP Airport and would request a permanent seat on the MAC to be appointed by the Eagan City Council. THE LONE OAK TREE 0ytlOn #2 The symbol of In addition to Minneapolis and St Paul having their own seats on the MAC, there are also strength and growth MAC Commissioners who represent greater Minnesota, including representatives from Duluth in our community. 07 City of Eagan / MAC Representation March 16, 2006 Page 2 and St. Cloud. It seems logical that if greater Minnesota and the core cities have representation on the MAC, so too should the communities most impacted by the airport's operations. There are four communities that encompass the 65 DNL noise contours that do not currently have their own representation on the MAC Eagan, Bloomington, Richfield, and Mendota Heights. It is suggested that at an -large seat either be reassigned to represent the cities in the 65 DNL contour or an at -large seat be added to the MAC in order to allow these four communities, on a rotating basis, to have a single representative on the MAC. Lastly, as a request for consideration, given the population shifts and impact of the airport on certain communities, there is a definite need to adjust the current MAC districts. The City understands that the districting for the MAC coincides with the Metropolitan Council districts; however, impact of the airport, both positively and negatively, should be a consideration when determining representation on the MAC. Clearly Eagan is impacted far greater and differently by the operations at MSP than Sciota Township in southern Dakota County is, yet, our communities have the same representation. The MAC districts need to better reflect population concentrations and the impact of MSP, and thus redistricting should be strongly considered. As representatives of the City of Eagan, you know how important it is that the City's interests and positions be heard on the MAC so that the needs of the aviation industry are balanced with the needs of our residents' quality of life. Therefore, if you could please share with the City your feedback to the two options set forth in this letter, and/or any input you have pertaining to our representation on the MAC, it would be greatly appreciated. Upon hearing from each of you, the City will then determine whether to seek the introduction of legislation during this session to address the issue of Eagan's representation on the MAC. Thank you in advance for your consideration of the City's proposal. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me or City Administrator Hedges at (651)675-5001. I look forward to hearing from you very soon, and wish you the best as you begin this legislative session. Sincerely, J r Pat Gea an g Mayor Attachment cc: Eagan City Council State Senator Metzen State Senator McGinn Representative Wardlow Representative Hansen Governor Tim Pawlenty 7(? a ., ��. Commissioner District Map Metropolitan Airports Commission IM Ca H h,e St. "I r . t' f I inwobd BUHTS I Wp. Chairwoman -Vicki Tidwell Commissioners (=30 District A -Tammy McGee Minneapolis - Dardal Boirvin (=:) Dism B - Molly Sigel SL Paul -Dick Long (ZD District C - Kad Berman outstate, CD� District D- John Williams Mira Landy. . Sent Tree Acres C� District E - Shany L. Stoneman GTag W8FoeF - Rochester District F - John Lanner. Paul Rdftrm - marshal District G - Tom Foley Robed Mom Jr. -Duluth District H - Ban McKazy MAt Is TW.e-�.e MMM IM Ca H h,e St. "I r . t' f I inwobd BUHTS I Wp. 'I- t E a 5 A bwi wp. Ma I.-Funo Y ,Sl T IL f, marshan Twp.. E Rav-nna I wp. E eka '-wp.. Doug! s Tw�qp. r I rk T Greenvale 2006-2007 Goals/Work Plan—Eagan Airport Relations Commission ARC Presented to City Council: March 14, 2006 Goal #1: Receive Better Representation on the MAC by Pursuing Legislation to Change Eagan's Current Representation o Preference: Eagan receives permanent representation on the MAC in the same way Minneapolis and St. Paul currently have seats. 0 2nd Choice: Eagan joins with the other communities in the 65 DNL contour (who do not currently have sole representation) to secure an at -large seat that would jointly represent the cities of Eagan, Bloomington, Richfield, and Mendota Heights. Work Plan to Achieve Goal: • Send correspondence to Eagan Legislative delegation to outline the changes the City is looking for with regard to MAC representation. Seek their opinions on the matter, and depending upon the response, inquire as to whether one of Eagan's State representatives or senators will introduce a bill to seek the change. • In late 2006, when MAC reappointments are being considered, participate in local cable show to discuss the issue of MAC representation and note Legislative support within Eagan. Goal #2: Seek a New District H Representative on the MAC (in the event that the City is not successful in securing a seat of its own or an at -large seat) o Promote or recommend a resident or business person in the community who would represent the interests of the City (e.g. noise concerns, promoting the transportation/aviation businesses in the community, etc.) while also recognizing the political goals of the Governor (election in November 2006). Work Plan to Achieve Goal: • Brainstorm list of possible replacements for Commissioner McKasy in early 2007. • Determine whether Commissioner McKasy is seeking another term on the MAC. Goal #3: Seek an Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Compliance Percentage of 95% or Greater in 2006. Work Plan to Achieve Goal: • Monitor monthly Corridor deviation. • Approach the FAA when compliance drops under 95% to request an explanation of the deviations. • Maintain communications with the MAC and FAA so they are aware of the Commission's focus on Corridor deviations. Other ARC Proiects/Initiatives for 2006 Continue Communication Initiatives o Experience Eagan updates on part 150, Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor, and Runway 17/35 operations 2006 ARC Goals/Work Plan February 14, 2006 City Council Meeting Page 2 o Cable television pieces as appropriate, including advertisement of MAC quarterly public input meetings. • 2008 Comprehensive Guide Plan Update—ARC to participate in updating of the Aviations Section Noise Study Part H o ARC to discuss whether'to conduct Phase II of the Wyle Noise Study in March o Make recommendation to the City Council in April on whether to pursue Phase II of the Study. o If Council chooses to approve Phase II of the Noise Study, study should be conducted in June, 2006 to be consistent with the study time period in 2005. Property Value Study/Survey of Residents Moving Out of Eagan o Approach the Southern Twin Cities Association of Realtors (STCAR) to see if they are interested in doing a study on: 1.)How have home sale rates in areas most impacted by the new runway been impacted (number of homes on market)?; 2.) How have homes sold in these areas appreciated/depreciated in value since October 27, 2005?; and, 3.) Of the residents moving out of Eagan, how much of a factor was airport noise in their decision to move? ("exit survey")? o If the STCAR is not interested in doing such a study, ask for their recommendation on a college or university who may best be able to assist the City. Runway Use o Summer 2006: Review use on each of the runways to determine if runway usage predictions in the 2007 proposed Part 150 Plan are accurate. o Summer 2006: Review the use of the individual flight tracks off of Runway 17/35 to determine if the usage matches with the data used to prepare the proposed 2007 Part 150 Plan. o Continue to review the MAC's monthly technical advisory reports and Runway 17 departure reports. • MAC Lawsuit o Continue to monitor status of the City's lawsuit against the MAC regarding.the noise mitigation program proposed in the 60-64 DNL contours. • Homeowner Initiated Mitigation o For those homeowners who wish to remodel or improve noise attenuation in their home, the City should promote the materials prepared by the MAC in 2005, which contains descriptions of products that are best for attenuating noise (e.g. window styles, doors, insulation values, etc.) d