04/11/2006 - Airport Relations CommissionAGENDA
EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION
MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2006
7:00 P.M.
I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD
IV. OLD BUSINESS
A. Communication Update
B. MAC Monthly Reports — Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor
Analysis/Technical Advisory Report/17-35 Departure Analysis Report
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. Consider Recommendation to. the City Council re: Part II of the Wyle Noise
Study
B. NOC Work Program / Prioritization of Part 150 Noise Compatibility
Program Noise Mitigation Measures
C. Joint Meeting with the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission
VI. STAFF / COMMISSION UPDATE
A. Correspondence to Eagan's Legislative Delegation re: MAC Representation
B Airport Relations Commission 2006-2007 Work Plan
B. Noise Oversight Committee / City of Apple Valley
C. Thanks to Out -Going Commissioners
VII. ROUNDTABLE
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of
less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid.
City of Evan demo
TO: CHAIR THORKILDSON AND THE EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS
COMMISSION
FROM: DIANNE MILLER, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: MARCH 29, 2006
SUBJECT: AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING/TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 2006
A regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission will be held on Tuesday, April 11,
2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Eagan City Council Chambers. In order that we have a quorum present,
please contact Mary Swenson at 651-675-5005 if you are unable to attend this meeting..
I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA
The agenda, as presented or modified, is in order for adoption by the Commission.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the February 13, 2006 Airport Relations Commission meeting are enclosed on
pages -I— through T._ Minutes of the Joint Workshop with the Eagan City Council on
Tuesday,, March 14 weri included on the April 4, 2006 City Councila enda for formal
consideration. Those minutes are enclosed on pages 7 through 17 for the Commission's
information. The February meeting minutes, as presented or modified, are in order for adoption
by the Commission.
III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD
The Eagan City Council and its Commissions set aside up to ten minutes at the beginning of
public meetings to permit visitors to address items of interest that are not scheduled on the
regular agenda. Items that will take more than ten minutes or that require specific action can be
scheduled for a future agenda.
IV. OLD BUSINESS -
A. Communication Update – At the February 13, 2006 Airport Relations Commission
Workshop, it was the decision of the Commission to disband the three Communication
Subcommittees that were put in place in preparation for the opening of the new runway. Rather,
the Commission asked that a general "Communications Update" be included on each agenda
should any of the Commissioners have recommendations or questions regarding airport
communications efforts in the community.
B. MAC Monthly Reports — Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis/Technical
Advisory Report/17-35 Departure Analysis Report — Enclosed on pages JI_ through
is the Febru y 2006 Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Analysis. Enclosed on pages /�_
through is the February 2006 Technical Advisory Report. Enclosed on pages 55:
through iil:: is the February 2006 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report. The February
reports are the most current reports available on the MAC website. It is the practice of the
Commission to review the reports and discuss any significant deviations that may have occurred
or any other noteworthy occurrences as reported in the analysis.
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. Consider Recommendation to the City Council regarding Part II of the Wyle Noise
Study — In June of 2005, in preparation for the opening of the new runway, at the
recommendation of the ARC, the Eagan City Council retained the consulting firm of Wyle
Laboratories to conduct a noise study to measure noise levels in the City of Eagan in advance of
the opening of Runway 17-35. At the completion of the study, it was noted by both the
Commission and the City Council that a decision should be made in the spring of 2006 to
determine whether a follow-up study should be conducted in June of 2006 to measure the noise
levels in the community following the opening and operation of Runway 17-35. At this time, it
is suggested that the Commission discuss the merits of conducting Part II of the noise study in
June of 2006 in order to make a recommendation to the City Council on whether to proceed.
B. NOC Work Program / Prioritization of Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program
Noise Mitigation Measures — Enclosed on pages through is a memo that was
distributed at the March 15, 2006 Noise Oversight Committee meeting regarding the
prioritization of the Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program Noise Mitigation Measures. This
item is included for the Commission's review should they have any questions or comments
pertaining to the evaluation. The memo also provides some historical background as to the
recommendations regarding departure and arrival track locations for Runway 17-35. The Noise
Compatibility Program has yet to be approved by the FAA, as it will be considered with the
entire Part 150 document waiting for FAA approval.
C. Joint Meeting with the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission — At the
request of the City of Mendota Heights, a joint meeting of the Eagan and Mendota Heights
Airport Relations Commissions has been scheduled for Tuesday, May 9, 2006. Recognizing that
the Eagan ARC will have new members joining in May, it is proposed that the Eagan Airport
Relations Commission meet from 7:00 to 7:30 p.m. in order to take care of Organizational
Business items and any other business that needs to be addressed. The Mendota Heights Airport
Relations Commission would then arrive to Eagan City Hall for a joint meeting at 7:30 p.m. At
this time, the Commission is welcome to discuss the upcoming joint meeting and any topics the
Commission believes would be beneficial for discussion items.
VI. STAFF / COMMISSION UPDATE
A. Correspondence to Eagan's Legislative Delegation re: MAC Representation —
Enclosed on pages ZZ through ][!J� is a copy of the letter that was sent to all members of
Eagan's legislative delegation as well as Governor Pawlenty regarding the current representation
that the City of Eagan receives on the Metropolitan Airports Commission. This letter was
forwarded to the delegation at the direction of the City Council and Airport Relations
Commission at the joint meeting on March 14, 2006. As of March 29, no responses have been
received from any members of the legislative delegation.
B. Air ort Relations Commission 2006-2007 Work Plan — Enclosed on pages 0 V
through is the 2006-2007 Airport Relations Commission Work Plan as approved by the
City Council at the March 14, 2006 Special City Council Workshop. The Work Plan is included
for the Commission members' reference. Should any Commissioners have items they would like
to address tonight, they are welcome to bring them forward; otherwise, the items on the Work
Plan will be included in upcoming ARC meetings.
C. Noise Oversight Committee / City of Apple Valley - At the March 15; 2006 Noise
Oversight Committee, the Committee unanimously approved the City of Apple Valley joining
the at -large communities on the Noise Oversight Committee. Additionally, a bylaw change was
approved that provides for a single representative of the at -large cities to serve a 2 -year term.
This change was suggested in order to increase continuity amongst the at -large seat.
D. Thanks to Out -Going Commissioners - A special thanks to Commissioners
Nierengarten, Krahn, and Aljets for their service on the Airports Relations Commission over the
past 3 years. Also, thank you to Commissioner Prentice, who has served a one-year alternative
term. Two of the four Commissioners have re-applied to continue service on the Airport
Relations Commission. Any re -appointments and new members will begin their terms on the
Airport Relations Commission at the May 9, 2006 ARC meeting.
VII. ROUNDTABLE
Per the request of the Commission, this agenda item has been added -so that Commissioners have
the opportunity to ask questions or make requests for future agenda items.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
It is the practice of the Airport Relations Commission to adjourn each meeting by 8:30 p.m.
Should the Commission need additional time, it is the Commission's practice to request a formal
vote to extend the meeting time.
Assistant to the City Administrator
13
MEETING NOTES
WORKSHOP OF THE
EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 13, 2006
Conference Room 1A & 1B
Present: Curtis Aljets, Jason Bonnett, Tammy Mencel, Steve Nierengarten, Jack Prentice and
Charles Thorkildson. Also present: Dianne Miller, Assistant to the City
Administrator
Absent: Valerie Dosland, Daniel Flanagan, Dean Haehnel and Nathan Krahn
GOALS -
1. Receive Better Representation on the MAC by Pursuing Legislation to Change Eagan's
Current Representation
o Preference: Eagan receives permanent representation on the MAC in the same way
Minneapolis and St. Paul currently have seats.
o 2"a Choice: Eagan joins with the other communities in the 65 DA contour (who do
not currently have sole representation) to secure an at -large seat that would jointly
represent the cities of Eagan, Bloomington, Richfield, and Mendota Heights.
Work Plan to Achieve Goal:
• Send correspondence to Eagan Legislative delegation to outline the
changes the City is looking for with regard to MAC representation. Seek
their opinions on the matter, and depending upon the response, inquire as
to whether one of Eagan's State representatives or senators will introduce
a bill to seek the change.
• In late 2006, when MAC reappointments are being considered, participate
in local cable show to discuss the issue of MAC representation and note
Legislative support within Eagan.
2. Seek a New District H Representative on the MAC (in the event that the City is not
successful in securing a seat of its own or an at -large seat)
o Promote or recommend a resident or business person in the community who would
represent the interests of the City (e.g. noise concerns, promoting the
transportation/aviation businesses in the community, etc.). Must consider political
party affiliation depending on who wins the Gubernatorial race iri November.
2006 Goals/Work Plan Meeting
February 13, 2006
Page 2
Work Plan to Achieve Goal:
• Brainstorm list of possible replacements for Commissioner McKasy in
early 2007.
• Find out whether Commissioner McKasy is seeking another term on the
MAC.
3. Seek an Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Compliance Percentage of 95% or Greater
in 2006.
Work Plan to Achieve Goal:
• Monitor Corridor deviation monthly.
• Approach the FAA when compliance drops under 95% to request an
explanation of the deviations.
• Maintain communications with the MAC and FAA so they are aware of
the Commission's focus on Corridor deviations.
Other ARC Projects/Initiatives for 2006
• Provide the City Council with a summary of the ARC goals
• Disband Communication Subcommittees
o In light of the runway opening and the end to the City's significant pre -runway
communications efforts, the ARC requested that a "Communication Update" be
placed on the ARC's monthly agenda so that the Commission as a whole can address
communication issues.
• 2008 Comprehensive Guide Plan Update—ARC to participate in updating of the Aviations
Section
Noise Study Part H
o ARC to discuss whether to conduct Phase II of the Wyle Noise Study in March
o Make recommendation to the City Council in April on whether to pursue Phase II of
the Study. .
o If Council chooses to approve Phase H of the Noise Study, study should be conducted
in June, 2006 to be consistent with the study time period in 2005.
Property Value Study/Survey of Residents Moving Out of Eagan
o Approach the Southern Twin Cities Association of Realtors (STCAR) to see if
they are interested in doing a study on: 1.)How have home sale rates in areas
most impacted by the new runway been impacted (number of homes on market)?;
2.) How have homes sold in these areas appreciated/depreciated in value since
October 27, 2005?; and, 3.) Of the residents moving out of Eagan, how much of a
factor was airport noise in their decision to move? ("exit survey")?
5
2006 Goals/Work Plan Meeting
February 13, 2006
Page 3
o If the STCAR is not interested in doing such a study, ask for their
recommendation on a college or university who may best be able to assist the
City.
• Runway Use
o Summer 2006: Review use on each of the runways to determine if runway usage
predictions in the 2007 proposed Part 150 Plan are accurate.
o Summer 2006: Review the use of the individual flight tracks off of Runway
17/35 to determine if the usage matches with the data used to prepare the
proposed 2007 Part 150 Plan.
MAC Lawsuit
o Continue to monitor status of the City's lawsuit against the MAC regarding the
noise mitigation program proposed in the 60-64 DNL contours.
WIN
(kb( c�►�Std�ratron
MINUTES -A NJ UD (W1\0
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING M15)
MARCH 14, 2006
5:30 P.M.
EAGAN ROOM — EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER
City Councilmembers present: Mayor Geagan, Councilmembers Carlson, Fields, and
Maguire. Councilmember Tilley was out of town attending the National League of Cities
Conference -
City staff present: City Administrator Hedges, Assistant to the City Administrator Miller,
Director of Administrative Services VanOverbeke, Director of Community Development
Hohenstein, Administrative Intern Walz, Public Works Director Colbert, Superintendent of Streets
Struve, City Planner Ridley, Deputy Police Chief McDonald, and Director of Communications
Garrison. City Attorney Mike Dougherty was also present.
I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION
Mayor Geagan called the meeting to order. Councilmember Fields moved; Councilmember
Maguire seconded a motion to adopt the agenda.
Aye: 3; Nay: 0 (Councilmember Carlson not yet present.)
H. SIGN CODE / WINDOW SIGNS
City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that the Eagan City Code establishes
standards under which signs are regulated within the City of Eagan. Hedges added that in 2005, the
City Council directed the Advisory Planning Commission and staff to study possible changes in the
regulation of temporary signs and additional regulation for window signage. At that time, Hedges
added that information about the proposed changes were distributed by the Chamber to its members.
It was noted that an article about the changes was also included the Eagan Business News
newsletter, and a press release was provided to the local media to highlight the changes in the
regulation of temporary signs and additional regulation for window signage. Hedges noted that the
code amendment was adopted in the summer of 2005. Hedges added that since the changes to the
sign code have gone into affect, the City and the Chamber have received a number of questions and
concerns regarding the implementation of the new regulations for window signage and, therefore,
due to these concerns, members of the City Council directed that a discussion item be placed on
tonight's agenda.
Ruthie Batulis, President of the Northern Dakota County Chambers of Commerce, as well as
John Curlee of Curlee State Farm, and. Buzz Anderson, President of Minnesota Retailers
Association, addressed the City Council with their concerns regarding the window signage changes.
Ms. Batulis made a request of the City Council to consider placing a moratorium on the sign code
changes in order to allow for the formation of a task force to further discuss the proposed changes to
the sign code, particularly with regard to window signage. The three representatives that address
W
the City Council also noted the excessive burden that the code changes have placed on Eagan
businesses.
The City Council discussed the concerns voiced by the Chamber of Commerce and business
community. Mayor Geagan also recognized many business owners and representatives in the
audience.
Councilmember Carlson arrived at 5:40 p.m.
Following Council discussion, Mayor Geagan moved; Councilmember Fields seconded a
motion to enact a moratorium on the sign code amendment for a period of 60 days and establish a
task force to include two Councilmembers (Councilmembers Fields and Maguire), two members of
the Advisory Planning Commission, Chamber President Batulis, and four diverse business
representatives within the City of Eagan. The recommendations of the task force are to be brought
back within 60 days.
Aye: 4; Nay: 0
The City Council recessed from 6:10 to 6:20 p.m.
The City Council workshop reconvened at 6:20 p.m.
I11. BROADBAND OVERVIEW
City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that in February 2004 the Eagan City
Council gave direction to form the first Technology Task Force and began examining what Eagan's
citywide Internet connectivity goals could or should be. Hedges added that the 2006 priorities for
the Technology Working Group include reporting back later this spring on recommendations for the
highest and best use for an 11.5 mile conduit route that Eagan owns, determining recommendations
regarding wireless needs, and determining how to attract world class Internet speeds to Eagan.
Lastly, Hedges added that in November of 2005, the City Council approved hiring the consulting
firm of Dynamic City to provide the City and the working group with the specific market and
engineering analysis regarding best use options for the conduit and also to supply expertise about
fiber options that could provide Eagan world class Internet speeds.
Communications Director Garrison introduced three consultants representing Dynamic City.
Keith Wilson, CEO of Dynamic City, provided a presentation to the City Council on world class
broadband.
Following Mr. Wilson's presentation, the City Council discussed broadband and Internet
needs within the City of Eagan. Communications Director Garrison noted that the consultants and
the Technology Working Group will be coming back to the City Council with options on how the
11.5 miles of conduit can be used within the City of Eagan.
Mayor Geagan thanked NDC Chamber President Ruthie Batulis for her involvement in the
broadband discussions.
0
IV. WINTER PARKING BAN ORDINANCE
City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that at the Council's Listening
Session on January 17, the City Council received a request from. several property owners on Eagle
Crest Drive to change the City's current winter parking ban ordinance to rectify a concern they have
with a neighbor's vehicle frequently parked in front of their home. At that time, the Council
referred the matter to the Public Works Committee for further review.
Hedges added that on February 13, the Public Works Committee met with the Petitioners
and reviewed the substantial documentation provided by the impacted homeowners, the current City
ordinances, and parking bans of several other communities.
Public Works Director Colbert, Superintendent of Streets Struve, and Deputy Chief
McDonald provided overviews of the various options available to the City with regard to snow
removal and control of on -street parking year-round.
Councilmember Maguire highlighted the discussion that the Public Works Committee had
on the issue.
Deputy Chief McDonald provided an overview of how other cities enforce winter parking
ordinances.
The City Council discussed the concerns of the residents on Eagle Crest Drive as well as the
City's overall enforcement of the winter parking ban ordinance.
An Eagan resident addressed the City Council regarding the issues that he and his wife have
with regard to cars parking in their neighborhood during the winter.
Upon further Council discussion, Councilmember Fields moved; Councilmember Maguire
made a motion to deny a request to change the City's winter parking ban ordinance and noted that if
the residents on Eagle Crest Drive approach the City with solidarity on a parking proposal via a
petition process, then the City Council will consider such a petition.
Aye: 4; Nay: 0
V. ADOPT -A -STREET PROGRAM
City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that the City of Eagan currently does
not have a formal program that allows citizens or business groups to provide litter control and
general community cleanup in an organized fashion along our local streets.
Director of Public Works Colbert provided a proposal to the Council for their consideration
of adopting such an "Adopt -A -Street" Program for the City of Eagan.
The City Council discussed the proposed program and the cost associated with
implementing it.
Councilmember Fields moved; Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to implement
the Adopt -A -Street Program in the City of Eagan, provided that signs placed on the adopted streets
be optional and, if it is the desire of the group and/or individual to have their name added to a sign;
the sign must be purchased by the group and/or individual.
Aye: 4; Nay: 0
The City Council briefly discussed the most recent snow removal process following over 10
inches of snow that fell this week. Mayor Geagan complemented the City staff for their prompt
work on snow removal.
V1. 2006 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES
City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that in keeping with the City
Council's past practice, a list of 2006 legislative priorities has been developed for the Council's
consideration. Hedges noted that the priorities included a list of items in which the Council has
taken a formal position. Hedges also added that the priorities presented do not duplicate the efforts
made by the three lobbying organizations to which the City of Eagan belongs.
The. City Council discussed the legislative priorities, including proposed legislation
regarding eminent domain. Mayor Geagan thanked Councilmember Carlson for testifying last week
with concerns regarding the eminent domain bill. Hedges noted the potential contractual
implications within existing TIF districts should such legislation move forward. The Council noted
that included in the priorities should be a request that a grandfather clause be added for TIF districts
already established through the State Auditors Office.
The City Council directed that a letter be sent to the City's legislative delegation with the
2006 legislative priorities. The Council also directed that in future years, a meeting be established
with the legislative delegation in advance of the session beginning. The Council also requested that
the legislative priorities be copied to the media.
VII. JOINT MEETING WITH THE AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION
City Administrator Hedges introduced the item noting that it is the City Council's practice to
meet with its Advisory Commissions at least once a year. City Administrator Hedges introduced
ARC Chair Chuck Thorkildson, who summarized the proposed 2006/2007 goals and work plan for
the ARC. The City Council and the ARC discussed the proposed work plan items, including a
realtor/resident survey to gauge the impact of airport noise on the community.
The City Council took a short recess from 7:35 to 7:45 p.m.
The meeting reconvened at 7:45 p.m.
The City Council and the ARC discussed the current representation the City of Eagan
receives on the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). The City Council and members of the
ARC noted the impact the airport has on Eagan and thus the need for additional representation on
the MAC. The Council and ARC discussed the merits of the City of Eagan receiving a seat on the
MAC, as well as the possibility of Eagan joining,with other communities within the 65 DNL noise
/0
contours to lobby for one of the at -large seats on the MAC that is currently assigned to an out -state
representative.
The City Council concurred with sending correspondence to the City's legislative delegation
regarding representation on the MAC, and suggested that it be noted that the MAC districts need to
be explored for possible redistricting in the near future to better represent population distribution
and impact of MSP Airport.
Councilmember Carlson suggested that a survey be included in the Eagan Welcome Packet
regarding how airport noise impacted a resident's decision to purchase a home.
Mayor Geagan thanked the Airport Relations Commission for their work this past year in
preparation of the opening of the new runway.
VIII. OTHER BUSINESS
The City Council and City Administrator Hedges briefly discussed the need to schedule a
workshop and Advisory Commission applicant interviews in the month of April. The City Council
agreed that Commission interviews will take place on April 25, with appointments being made on
May 2, 2006.
At the request of Councilmember Carlson, the City Council agreed that a letter should be
sent to all businesses that are present at the workshop tonight regarding their concerns with the
changes to the sign code. It was noted that the letter should include a brief summary of the
communications process that was in place when the ordinance was drafted as well as a summary of
the moratorium and task force that was established at tonight's meeting. The Council also
suggested that when the task force members are appointed, that their names be included on the
City's website. The City Council also requested that the list of communities surveyed with regard to
window signage ordinances be expanded and also that Eagan be included on the survey,
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Fields moved; Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to adjourn at
8:25 p.m.
Aye: 4; Nay: 0
February 2006
Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure
{Corridor Analysis
�J e
4
ppp
FRS.✓
� + � f = -.
• � d f r e
wV
4
.e �I
1f5
H�
C 'x
Jw^
Metropolitan Airports Commission
1773 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in February 2006
1660 (93.6%) of those Operations Remained in the Corridor
1773 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure 1660 (93.6%) Total 12L & 12R Carrier
. Operations Departure Operations in the Corridor
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for Gate In -Corridor
02/01/2006 00:00:00 - 03/01/2006 00:00:00
1660 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 859 (51.7%), Right = 801 (48.3%)
w svoo -
d
LL
5000 .... .... .. .... ... ; ... .
O;
O O Q..
4000 ....... ........O - O .. o........ ..... O :... .
m 0
Lu 3000-..... . ...
0
.M2000
1000
a° -20001000 ..... ...
0
a o
-2 -1 0 1 2
Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles)
-f- Arrival O Departure 0 Overflights
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis
(15
Page 1
Metropolitan Airports Commission
39 (2.2%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
North of the 090° Corridor Boundary During February 2006
- x�f 4 !
_N
I' .. !
tir t xx • Ttib yr y
re �i —
fif
<q x—b�
�:, �'.•. _ O � O FSI• � f: ,�:1.t ? �'SI �� {
J f aan�y} f
,i Fes., f�/ �C''-� �� �Vi�\-.dr•d_•-R� 4. I,�",f�`� '{ s^'.
5 y. t
rlv t N t. i'y irc — �R ..
i � n. � ��,la „�, ���� a � Yt� �� � � -� ice" � � •
ft. a j �rk"..�
� f Kfi �irT; i J �� � y-T�` 41t' � }•v� ! � � ♦' � -7 1 l� � '1
to --
2 mill
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for Gate North -Corridor
02/01/2006 00:00:00 - 03/01/2006 00:00:00
39 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1 (2.6%), Right = 38 (97.4°/x)
.: 6000
d
m
5000
0
a 4000
_d
UJ 3000
0
CL 2000
Q
> 1000
0
r
Q 0
F.......................... _. ....... ,....... ...........l
-2 -1 0 1 2
(Runway End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (Corridor End)
— Arrival ' Departure Overflight
Page 2 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis
14
U
Metropolitan Airports Commission
74 (4.2%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
South of the Corridor (South of 30L Localizer) During February 2006
ILL
i,�.�i$
mRpp q la7 �[40 5.'rFF TIP" a ..
u.`�,.';3'6'�
es:�Mlnx�.�lsusc.i•ass:I:Se,�tas„• �� � �! `�s -_ �_, e
a
:41.06Z EFIN r.6
:�� raw �r• 'y
■ PUN i m
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South -Corridor
02/01/2006 00:00:00 - 03101/2006 00:00:00
74 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 46 (62.2%), Right = 28 (37.8%)
�. 6000
d
CD
5000 ................. _. ...;..
0
a 4000............. .. .........
d
Lu3000 4.............0 .:..... o ............:.... .............:......... ..
O;
a 2000 o ooc °' O ........ . ........... .
o
o
0 l000 ......... ....o.:..........aca...:.0 .. b. ..�.........
a n
-2 -1 0 1 2
(Corridor End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY Mid -Point)
+ Arrival O Departure ❑ Overflight`
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Page 3
15-
Metropolitan Airports Commission
4 (0.2%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 5°
South of the Corridor (50 South of 30L Localizer) During February 2006
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South_Corridor_5deg
02/01/2006 00:00:00 - 03/01/2006 00:00:00
4 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 4 (100.0%), Right = 0 (0.0%)
= 6000
Q
m
c5000 ..... .................
0
a4000 ..... ............... ................ .................
m
Lu3000 ............. . .......; .. ..............
c. 2000 ........ 09 .................................. . .................
1000 .......... .. . ... . ....................... .. ................
0
a0 _.W ..
-2 -1 0 1 2
(Corridor End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (RWY Mid -Point)
Arrival ? Departure El Qverflightl
■a:rmm rrnrr�rarns�n� � i i®
Page 4 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis
144
L'
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Top 15 Runway 12L and 12R Departure Destinations for February 2006
DTIV
Detroit
10,50
51
2.9%
ORD
Chicago - O'Hare
124.0
51
2.9%
ATL
Atlanta1.49
0
34
19%
CLE -
Cleveland '
10:9°
321:8%
o
EWR
Newark
1.060
30
1:7%.
MKE
Milwaukee
1140:25
1.49/6:
SLG
Salt Lake City2520j
_
23
1.3%
.DEN
Denver
2.370 ::
22
. 1.2%
LAS,
Las Vegas:.:
243 o
_ 22
1.2%
MMChicago
-Midway
0 ..
124
22
SEA
Seattle2:78°.:
22
1:2%
LGA.
New York.- La Guardia
105°
21
1.2%
YYZ
Toronto.0.950
21
1,.2%
LAX
Los:Angeles
2380_
20
1A
JFK
New. York - 7FK
1 pg
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis
17
Page 5
February 2006
Technical Advisor's Report
Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport
I�
C
Table of Contents for February 2006
Complaint Summary
Noise Complaint Map
FAA Available Time for Runway Usage _
MSP All Operations Runway Usage _.
MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage
MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition
MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage
MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage
MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's by Type.
MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's Stage Mix
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map__
Minutes Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events
Minutes Above dB Threshold for Departure Related Noise Events
Arrival Related Noise Events
Departure Related Noise Events _
MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT
Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events Aircraft Ldn dBA_
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11-14
15
16
17
18
19
20-32
33-35
MSP Complaints by City
February 2006
City
M
Arrival
De arture
Other
Number ofNl
Complaints
Number of
Complainants
% of Total
Complaints
APPLE VALLEY
116
692
16
137
4
172
1137
135
26.7`-,'%
BLOOMINGTON
26
4
166
.51
13
9
269
26
6.340
BURNSVILLE
5
29
89
431
4
2
560
37
13.1%
EAGAN
34
405
II
111 i
+
397
1
192
1140
I44
26.9%
EDINA
U
0
5
20
0
9
34
l
0.8%
FARMINGTON
0
18
0
0
0
0
18
1
0.4%
GOLDEN VALLEY
0
(1
0
2
(1
0
2
1
0.0%
INVER GROVE
HEIGHTS
1
g
4
6
0
0
19
2
0.4°0
LAK.EVILLE
4
136
1
16
0
15
172
17
4.0%
NTENDOTA HEIGHTS
0
0
8
158
0
0
166
4
3,9%
MINNEAPOLIS
8
14
46
1.74
1
4
247
49
5.8%
MINNETONKA
9
D
4
U
U
0
13
2
0.3%
PRIOR LAKE
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0.0%
RICHFIELD
1
0
392
3
2
8
406
12
9.5%
ROSEMOUNT
0
2
1
1
0
0
4
3
0.1%
SAINT LOUIS PARK
0
59
(I
0
0
0
59
1.
1.4%
SAINT PAUL
0
0
0
8
0
1
9
4
0.20/0
SAVAGE
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
1
0.0010
SOUTH SAINT
PAUL
U
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0.0410
Total
1571
12:1.
251
437
4259
445
100.0%
Nature of MSP Complaints
Complaint
Airport
Total'
Early/Late
236
718
Engine Run-up
2
52
Excessive Noise
1060
3081
Frequency
213
1814
Ground Noise
188
212
Helicopter
4
5
Low Flying
85
1706
Structural Disturbance
32
285
Other
15
134
Total
9942
Note. Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints filed via the Intemet.
Sum of % Total of Complaints may not equal 100% due to rounding.
•As of May 2005, the MSP Complaints by City report includes multiple
complaint descriptors per individual complaint. Therefore, the number of
complaint descriptors may be more than the number of
Time
of Da
Airport
Time I
Total
4259
0000 - M591
67
161
0600-0659
37
138
0700- 1159
256
731.
1200- 1559
158 1
414
1600- 1959
249
977
2000-21.59
137
430
2200-2259
109
202
2300-2359
61
132
Total
4259
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
ab
Complaints by
Ar ort
Airport
Total
M:SP
4259
Airlake
0
Anoka
8
Crystal
0
Flvina Cloud
16
Lake Elmo
0
St. Paul
9
Misc.
0
Total
4292
NNW.
Ax. im ion Noi,;e *oni ltt,+ for -1.14 lam lt 104-4
f ! .. i,' ��.ftl i c ;1 f ' °. i t "—alp. •t::l I r.sl r
4,.''f . iJ .�� i i �•� '� r--•���1�.�.-�� 1 � tt r�-A'�IRtl 11S l 1 i�-tl`�.1
' v
id d'I
Mop S
Slot
,�,. ``' v"'" ,� r i � e,��� Vit. •` .` "s" � '�
11
, � r � +�£'�111 �*, t� +o, �cr� ak 1"ro i� i :" � • !3 $ ��+" �±'� \ .
Numbor of Complaints per Addross
1-6 s 20-33 .s
R
'x` 6 1
06461
+t
2 A Product o'the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
Available Time for Runway Use
February 2006
(Source: FAA Runway Use Logs)
All Hours ;
i ".0'/P 0.0%P
.0%.
fJ -
55.4%
17.0%
34_2%
13.9%,.
MSFT Runway Use Percentoge Diagram
FAA Average Dailv Count
z5.9°r° E
d
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Progra 3
February 2005
February 2006
Air Carrier
963
814
Commuter
435
381
General Aviation
86
95
Military
_
7 _ _ j
7
Tota1
1491
1297
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Progra 3
All Operations
Runway Use Report February 2006
i 38.5% 9.3%
.0%
:ori°
�c
el000"
32. t °/o
7.9%
s3 Q.0"% /44.3%
47.6.°0
3'/0,.
MSP Runway Use Percentage Diagram
ii
R. WY
Arrival/
De arture
Ove i W Area
Count .
O erations
Percent
Last Year
Count
O erations.
Last Year
Percent -
4
Arr
So. Richfield/Bloomington
0
0.0%
1
0.0%
12L
Arr
So. Minneapolis/No, Richfield
1667
9.3%
3045
15.0%
12R
Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
1716
9.6%
3016
14.8%
1.7
Arr
So. Minneapolis
0
0.0%
N/A
0.0%
22
Arr
St. Paul,,Hinhland Park
0
0.0%
3
0.0%
30L
Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
5635
3.1.5%
7198
35.4%
30R
Arr
E an/Mendota HeiLhts
5744
32.1%
7081
34.8%
35
Arr
Bloominrton/E gan
31.52
17.6%
N/A
0.0%
Total Arrivals
17914
20344
4
Dep
St. Paulffl hland Park
0
0.0%
10
0.0%
12L
Dep
Eaggan/Mendota Heights
1409
7.9%
2952
14.7%
12R
Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
772 1
4.3%°
3,060
15.2%
17
Dep
Bloomin ton/Eaaan
1473
8.3%
N/A
0.0%
22
Dep
So. Richfield/Bloomington,
0
0.0%
105
0.5%
30L
De)
So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield
6852
38.5%
6795
33.8%
30.R
Dep
So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield
7299
41.0%
7189
35.8%
35
Dep
So. Minne• olis
0
0.0%
N/A
0.00/,0
Total Departures
17805
1 20111
Total O erations
35719
140455
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
4 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
a..3
Carrier Jet Operations
Runway Use Report February 2006
0.0%
0.0% .0%
9.7% 0.0%
a 40,0%
1� 9.8%
31.3%°
7.6% "-
2.0°I°
0.0% 4.4%°
m
0:0%
17.9%
i 8.3%
jj.
d
MSP Runway Use Percgi fLge Diagram
RWY
Arrival/
Departure Overflight Area
Count
Operations
Percent
Last Year
Count
_Operations .;
Last Year
Percent
4
Arr
So. Richfield/Bloomi-tiLton
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
12L
Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
1326
9.0%
2452
14.6%
12R
Arr
So. 1vEnnea olis/No. Richfield
1444
9.8%0.
2660
15.8%
17
Arr
So. Minnea . olis
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
22
Arr
St. Paul/Hi ihland Park
0
0.0%
1
0.0%
30L
AiT
Eagan/Mendota Hei rhts
4733
32.0%
5957
35.5%
30R
Arr.
Eagan/Mendota Heights
4636
31.3%
5730
34.1%
35
Arr
Bloomington/Ea an
2653
179%
N/A
0.0%
Total Arrivals
14792 1
16800
4
Dep
St. Paul/HiLhland Park
0
0.0%
6
0.0%
12L
DeL3
Eagan/Mendota Heights
1122
7.6%
2419
14.6%
12R
De)
Eagan/Mendota Heights
651
4.4%
2645
15.9%
17
Dep
Bloomin .ton/Eagan
1.227
8.3%
N/A
0.0%
22
De.
So. Richfield:Bloomington
0
0.0%
15
0.1%
30L
Dep
So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield
5906
40.0%
5778
34.7%
30R
De
So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield
5854
39.7%
5773
34.7%
35
Dep
So. Minneapolis
0
0.0%
N/A
0.0%
Total Departures
14760
16636
Total Operations
29552
1 33436
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 1 DD°/ due to rounding.
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program Z4 5
0
February 2006 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition
j
F e_
TAR Part 36 Take -
OffNoise Leve!
aircraft Description
S e
Count
Percent
B742
_
110.0
Bocine 747-200
3
2
0.0%
B741
109.4
Boeing 747-100
3
0
0.0%
B743
DC:SQ
DCIO
105.5-
105.5
103.0
Bocin 747-300
McDonnell Douglas DC8-500/600
McDonnell Douglas DC10
3
2
3
0
310
0.0%
0.0%
1..0%
B72Q
B744
102.4
101.6 -
Boeing 727-200 ,- - --
--� - Boei:n 747400
- 2_
3
_.-. 0 _-.._
65
0.0%._
0.20/0
I)C'SQ
100.5
McDonnell Douglas DC8 (Modified S . 3)
3
64
0.2%
L1.01
99.3
I.ock.heed I. 1.011.
3
0
O.fi%
I)C9Q
98.1
McDonnell Douglas DC9
2
0
0.0%
B73t 1
97.7
Boeing 737-200
2
0
0.0%
BA11
97.0
British Aerospace BA 1-11 (Modified Str. 3)
3
0
0.0%
A340
96.2
Airbus Industries A340
3
0
O.O°.o
MD11
95.8
McDonnell Douglas MD 11
3
2
0.0%
B767
95.7
Boein e 767-200/300
3
2
0.0%
A330
95.6
Airbus Industries A330
3
56
0.2%
B72Q
94.5
Boeing 727 (Modified S!& 3)
3
579 _
2.0%
DC8Q
94.5
McDonnell Douglas DC8-700
3
0
0.0%
B777
94.3
Boein& 777
3
0
0.0%
A300
94.0
Airbus Industries A30034-600
3
134
0.5%
A310
92.9
Airbus Industries A310
3
35
0.1%
F28
92.9
Fokker 28
2
0
0.0%
B73Q
92.1
Boeing. 737 Modified Sty. 3)
3
63
0.2°/g
MD80
91.5
McDonnell Dolmas lMD-80
3
605 1
2.0%
B757
91.4
Boeing 757-200/300
3
3033
10.3%
DC9Q_
91.0
McDonnell Douglas DC9 (Modified Ste. 3)
3
4250
14.4%
A321
89.8
Airbus Industries A321
3
0
0.0%
B734
88.9
Boeing 737-400
3
4
0.0"/°
A320
87.8
Airbus Industries A320
3
4028
13.6%
B735
87.7
Boei m 737-500
3
510
1.7%
B738
87.7
Boeing 737-800
3
1575
5.3%
A318
87.5
Airbus Industries A318
3
42
0.1%
A319
87.5
Airbus Industries A319
3 1
3674
12.4%
B733
87.5
Boeing.737-300
3 1
671
2.3%
8737
87.5
Boein 737-700
3
32
0.1%
RJ85
84.9
British Aerospace 146
3
1470
5.0%
B712
83.0
Boeing 717-200
3
713 1
2.4%
El 70
82.7
Embraer 170
3
170
0.6%
EJ45
81.8
Ennbraer 145
3
945
3.2%
F100
81.8
Fokker 100
3
0
0.0%
C':U
79.8
Canadair Regional Jet
3
6501
22.0%
E135
77.9
British Aerospace 135
3
17
0.1%
3328
I 76.5
Fairchild Domier 328
3
0
0.0%
Totals
29552
Note: Sum of fleet mix % may not soual 1000/6 due to rounding.
Count
Current
Percent
Last Years
Percent
Stage II 0
0.0%
0.0%
Stage III 4956
16.8%
20.9%
Stage III Manufactured _ 24596
83.2%
o
79.1%
Total Stage I]] _. _ 29552
Note. Stage III represent aircraft modified to meet all stage III criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This
Includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations.
-The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented per aircraft type during take -off measured in EPNL dBA
(Effective Perceived Noise Level).
•EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one-tenth of tone -corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover
measured in A -weighted decibels.
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
a'5�_
Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Runway Use Report February 2006
,
0.0%
0.0% .0%
22% 0.0% .
3.2!c ° .,.......-.-�-_.':.�•
-
6.9%
2'6-7%
6.9%
2.8%
-- 0.0%
0.3%
.2%
MSP Runway Use Percentage Diagram
RWY
Arrival/
Departure
Overfligbt Area
Count
Operations
Percent
Last Year
Count Last Year
Operations Percent
4
Arr
So. Richfield/Bloomington
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
12L
Air
So. Minna olisrNo. Richfield
37
3.2%
76
' 6.8%
12R
Arr
So. Minneapolis,/No. Richfield
79
6.9%
210
18.9%
17
Arr
So. Minneapolis
0
0.0%
N/A
0.0%
22
Arr
St. Paul/Highland Park
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
30L
Arr
Ea-ran/Mendota Heights
718
62.8%
563
50.7%
3OR
Arr
Ea an/Mendota Heights
305
26.7%
262
23.6%
35
Arr
Bloominaton/E man
4
0.3%
N/A
0.0%
Total Arrivals
1143
1111
4
Dep
St. Paul/Hi=daland Park
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
12L
Dep_Eagan/Mendota
Hei lits
42
6.9%
95
15.5%
12R
Del)
Eanan%Mendota Heights
58
9.6%
121
19.7%
17
Dep
Bloomin�rton/Eagan
1
0.2%
N/A
0.0%
22
Dep
So. Ri.chfield/Bloomi =loon
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
30L
De)
So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield
249
41.1%
170
27.7%
30R
De)
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
256
42.2%
227
37.1%
35
Dei
So. Minneapolis
0
0.0%�
N/A
0.0%
Total Departures
606
613
Total O erations
1749
1724
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100 due to rounding.
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program % 7
Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Runway Use Report February 2006
0.0%.:
o or o°i°
r 2.6%
art 1 6-9%
e 2.7.6°fo
6.9%
.0%-
.0% i
0/u _ .
t
- t
MSP Runway Use Percentage Diagram
RWY
Arrival/ Count
De acture OverflightArea Operation
Percent
Last Year
Count
Operations
Last. Year
Percent
4
Arr So. Ri.chfiel.d/BIoominaton 0
0.0%
0
12L
Arr So. Minnea olis/No. Richfield 36
3.3%
74*7"
12R
Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 74
6.9%
20417
Arr So. Minn.ea olis 0
0.0%
N/A22
Arr St. Paul/Hiahland Park 0
0.0%
030L
Arr Ea an/Mendota Hei 7hts 668
62.0%
52030R
Arr Eaean/Mendota Heights 297
27.6%
24335
Arr BloomiRLton/Eati=an 3
0.3%
N/A
Total Arrivals 10.78
10.41.
4
De? St. Paul/Hiahland. Park 0
0.0%
0
0.0%
12L
DS2 Eat an/M:endota Heights 36
6.9%
72
14.8%
12R
Dep Ea-an/Mendota Heights 47
9.0%
97
20.0%
17
Dep Bloomin *ton/Ea an 0
0.0%
N/A
0.0%-
22
Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 0
0.0%
0
0.0%
30L
Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield. 222
42.6%
145
29.8%
30R
Dep So. M.innea olis/No. Richfield 216
41.5%
1.72
35.4%
35
Dep So. Minneapolis 0
0.0%
N/A
0.0%
Total Departures $21
486
_
Total Operations 1599
1
1527
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
8 �A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
February 2006 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Total Nighttime Jet
Operations by Hour
Hour
Count
2230
435
2300
431
2400
173
100
61
200
24
300
28
400
74
500
373
TOTAL
1599
Airline
ID
Stage
Type
Count
America. West
AWE
3
A319
28
America West
AWE
3
A320
27
America West
AWE
3
B733
12
Air Wisconson
AW]
3
CRJ
46
Continental Exp
BTA
3
E145
40
Champion Air
CCP
3
B72Q
56
Delta
DAL
3
B73Q
35
DHL
DHL
3
B72Q
53
American Ea le
EGF 1
3
CRJ
15
American Eagle
EGF
3
E145
30
FedEx
FDX
3
A300
4
FedEx
FDX
3
A310
17
FedEx
FDX
3
B72Q
2
FedEx
FDX.
3
DC10
39
Pinnacle
FLG
3
CRJ
159
Kitty Hawk
KHA
3
B72Q
5
Kitty Hawk
KHA
3
B733
35
Mesaba.
MES
3
CRJ
3
Nlesaba
MES
3
RJ85
34
Northwest
NWA
3
A319
71
Northwest
NWA
3
A320
135
Northwest
NWA
3
A333
1
Northwest
NWA
3
B757
138
Northwest
NWA
3
DC10
22
Northwest
NWA
3
DC9Q
57
Sun Countiv
I SCX
3
B738
225
United
UAL3
B733
22
United
UAL
3
B735
29
UPS
UPS
3
A300
12
UPS
UPS
3
B757
6
UPS
UPS
3
B767
1.
UPS
UPS
3
DC8
32
Total
1391
Note. The top 15 nighttime operators represent 87.0% of the total nighttime carrier j et operations.
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program+ e 9
February 2006 Nighttime Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines��
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
500
400
0
.r
Ld
RS
d 300
a.
O
0
200
a
z 100 _
s
r
~ � GG4 ��ti " ti '4P ��+
Air.line
❑ Stage 2 ❑ Stage 3 ® Manufactured Stage 3
February 2006 Nighttime Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines
0:30 n.m. to 6:00 a.m.
-
Airline
Stage 2
Stage 3
Manufactured
Stage 3
Total
AWE
0
0
67
67
AWI
0
0
46
46
BTA
0
0
40
40
CCP
0
56
0
56
DAL
0
35
0
35
DHL
0
53
0
53
EGF
0
0
45
45
FDX
0
2
60
62
FLG
0
0
159
159
KHA
0
5
35
40
MES
0
0
37
37
NWA
0
57
367
424
SCX
0
0
225
225
UAL
0
0
51
51
UPS
0
32
19
51
Total.:
0.....
240
1151
1,391
10 A Product of the UAroi2olitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — February 2006
Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 4127 Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 4103 Carrier Jet Departures
Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 276 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 113 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
\
Ly
7,e i \4
Y \,
Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 276 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 1 thru 8, 2006 — 113 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program _;:j,% 11
\
7,e i \4
Y \,
`
Sm IF N
D'
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program _;:j,% 11
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — February 2006
Feb 9 thru 16, 2006 — 4107 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Feb 9 thru 16, 2006 — 4091 Carrier Jet Departures
Feb 9 thru 16, 2006 — 293 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals
5 milr N
�� m
Feb 9 thru 16, 2006 — 150 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
Y y.
`1 4
?' y
12 A Product of the Mp. litan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
sq
ff
Y y.
`1 4
?' y
12 A Product of the Mp. litan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — February 2006
Feb 17 thru 24, 2006 — 4416 Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 17 thru 24, 2006 — 4414 Carrier Jet Departures
Feb 17 thru 24, 2006 — 343 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Feb 17 thru 24, 2006 — 182 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Prog am 13
i
w
S N. N
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Prog am 13
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — February 2006
Feb 25 thru 28, 2006 — 2142 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Feb 25 thru 28, 2006 —166 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals
Feb 25 thru 28, 2006 — 2152 Carrier Jet Departures
Feb 25 thru 28, 2006 — 76 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
14 A Product of the Metran Airports Commission ANOMS Program
`33
�xf
EEIIJI
Feb 25 thru 28, 2006 — 76 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
14 A Product of the Metran Airports Commission ANOMS Program
`33
Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System
j
Lemen
30 Remote Monitoring Tower
•
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Progralp
15
4
Ar
Lemen
30 Remote Monitoring Tower
•
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Progralp
15
Time Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events
February 2006
RMT
ID
Cit
Address
Time
65dB
Time
:2!8UdB
Time
? 90dB
Time
> 100dB
1
Minneapolis
Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St.
4:28:31
0:00:08
0:00:00
0:00:00
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
5:05:09
0:00:47
0:00:00
0:00:00
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
7:16:20
0:17:28
0:00:19
0:00:00
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
6:00:47
0:03:44
0:00:00
0:00:00
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. &. 58th St,
8:41:45
1:40:31
0:01:13
0:00:00
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
7:40:49
1:07:49
0:00:47
0:00:00
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
0:10:10
0:00:11
0:00:00
0:00:00
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
0:06:46
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
10
St. Paul
Itasca. Ave. & Bowdoin St.
0:00:26
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
1.1.
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
0:00:28
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
12
St. Paul
Alton. St. & Rockwood Ave.
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
0:13:53
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
14
Eagan
1 st St. & Mckee St.
27:50:35
0:00:57
0:00:00
0:00:00
15
Mendota Heights
Culion. St. & Lexington Ave. I
0:43:00
0:00:31
0:00:00
0:00:00
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
28:55:31
1:34:39
0:00:09
0:00:00
17
Bloomineton
84th St. & 4th Ave.
0:01:59
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave
0:19:24
0:00:27
0:00:00
0:00:00
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
0:06:00
0:00:08
0:00:00
0:00:00
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
0:02:58
0:00:11
0:00:00
0:00:00
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
0:14:11
0:00:04
0:00:00
0:00:00
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
13:23:12
0:00:34
0:00:00
0:00:00
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
3:59:48
0:03:28
0:00:00
0:00:00
24
Eagan
Cha lei Ln. & Wren Ln.
24:38:13
0:02:28
0:00:00
0:00:00
25
Ea an
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
1:13:08
0:00:31
0:00:00
0:00:00
26
Inver. Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
1:33:11
0:00:37
0:00:00
0:00:00
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irvin Ave. S.
0:07:42
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
28
Richfield
6645 16th Avenue S:
0:36:00
0:00:29
0:00:00
0:00:00
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S.
0:00:10
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
30
Bloomington
8715 River Rid e Rd.
4:03:51
0:00:19
1 0:00:00
0:00:00
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave, S.
0:06:01
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
0:00:28 1
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
0:04:34
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
0:06:09
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet 1n.
7:21:02
0:00:10
0:00:00
0:00:00
36
Apple Vallcv
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
10:47:21
0:00:22
0:00:00
0.:00:00
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
0:04:35
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
38
Eagan
3957 Tur. uoise Cir.
0:01:28
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
39
E ran
3477 St Charles Pl.
0:01:36
0:00:02
0:00:00
0:00:00
Total Time for Arrival Related Events
166-07:11
4:;6:35
0:02:28
0:00:00
16 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
35—
Time Above dB Threshold for Departure Related Noise Events
February 2006
RMT
ID
ci!y
Address
Time
>_ 65dB
Time 1
>_ 80dB
-F-
T Time
>_ 90dB>_
Time
100dB
1
Minneapolis
Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St.
3:52:58
0:05:050:00:03
0:00:00
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
4:45:.59
0:04:32
0:00:05
0:00:00
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
11:41:07
0:22:22
0:03:16
0:00:00
4
5
Minneapolis
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
12th Ave. & 58th St.
13:02:18
53:38:39
0:14:50
4:44:47
0:00:45
0:49:54
0:00:00
0:01:30
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
63:45:31
6:27:13
1:10:40
0:00:20
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 1
29:17:51
1:14:35
0:04:19
0:00:00
8
Minnea olis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
14:12:44
0:22:49
0:00:12
0:00:00
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
0:02:11
0:00:03
0:00:00
0:00:00
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
0:01:30
0:00:01
0:00:00
0:00:00
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
0:03:42
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
0:01:59
0:00:00
0:00:00
0:00:00
13
Mendota I-Ieiahts
Southeast end of Mohican Court
3:11:27
0:01:53
0:00:01
0:00:00
14
Eagan
1st St. & Mckee St.
3:58:50
0:12:52
0:00:41
0:00:00
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. &. Lexington Ave.
4:22:30
0:04:43
0:00:00
0:00:00
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
4:10:44
0:17:39
0:02:14
0:00:00
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
0:24:02
0:00:25
0:00:00
0:00:00
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave
4:13:42
0:01:48
0:00:00
0:00:00
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
3:11:03
0:00:55
0:00:00
0:00:00
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
1:01:11
0:00:40
0:00:00
0:00:00
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
1:10:43
0:00:11
0:00:00
0:00:00
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
1:02:10
0:00:51
0:00:00
0:00:00
23
Mendota Hei6;hts
End of Ken ndon Ave.
7:00:40
0:28:10
0:02:18
0:00:00
24
Ea65an
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
2:26:52
0:03:21
0:00:02
0:00:00
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park. 1321. Jurdy Rd.
2:10:55
0:00:37
0:00:04
0:00:00
26
Inver Grove_ Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
1:42:35
0:02:42
0:00:00
0:00:00
27
Minnea?olis
Anthony School 5757 Irving, Ave. S.
14:04:44
0:30:09
0:02:46
0:00:00
28
Richfield
6645 16th Avenue S.
25:33:04
0:12:35
0:00:33
0:00:00
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
9:42:44
0:08:36
0:00:27
0:00:00
30
Bloomi yton
8715 River Ridge Rd
6:16:40
0:34:17
0:00:40
0:00:00
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
0:36:47
0:00:20
0:00:00
0:00:00
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
0:20:45
0:00:21
0:00:00
0:00:00
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
2:09:41
0:01:53
0:00:00
0:00:00
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
1:06:12
0:00:27
0:00:00
0:00:00
35
Egan
2100 Garnet In.
1:12:29
0:00:41
0:00:00
0:00:00
36
App le Val.le_v
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
0:21:19
0:00:1.3
0:00:00
0:00:00
37
Eagan
4399 Wood ate Ln. N.
0:39:00
0:00:29
0:00:00
0:00:00
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
1:12:24
0:00:44
0:00:00
0:00:00
39
Eagan
3477 St Charles Pl.
0:50:15
0:00:20
0:00:00
0:00:00
Total Time for Departure Related Events
298:39:57
16:18:09
2:19:00
0:01:50
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 17
-36
Arrival Related Noise Events
February 2006
RMT
ID
City Address
Arrival
Events ?
65dB
Arrival
Events >
8OdB
Arrival
Events >_
90dB
Arrival
Events >:
100dB
1
Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St.
1339
4
0
0
2
Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
1504
30
0
0
3
Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
1742
293
3
0
4
Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St.
1669
84
0
0
5
Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St.
1854
1304
32
0
6
Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St.
1770
1231
30
0
7
Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
39
1
0
0
8
Minneapolis I Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
25
0
0
0
9
St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
4
0
0
0
10
St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
2
0
0
0
11
St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
2
0
0
0
12
St. Paul. Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
3
0
0
0
13
Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court
58
0
0
0
14
Eagan 1 st St. & Mckee St.
6508
27
0
0
15
Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
156
8
0
I 0
16
Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
5887
1172
5
0
17
Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave.
I 11
0
0
0
18
Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave
95
5
0
0
19
Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St.
26
4
0
0
20
Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave.
12
2
0
0
21
Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
83
1
0
0
22
Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail
3406
15
0
0
23
Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave.
990
33
0
0
24
Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
6088
1 46
0
1 0
25
Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
259
8
0
0
26
Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
485
8
0
0
27
Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
32
0
0
0
28
Richfield 6645 16th Avenue S.
129
6
0
0
29
Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
9
0
0
0
30
Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd.
1165
3
0
0
31
Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S.
27
0
0
0
32
I Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
8
0
0
0
33
Burnsville North River Hills Park
22
0
0
0
34
Burnsville Red Oak Park
39
0
0
0
35
Eagan 2100 Garnet In.
1896
5
0
0
36
Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
2310
9
0
0
37
Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
19
0
0
0
38
.Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir.
9
0
r 0
0
39
Eagan 3477 St Charles Pl.
11
I
1_ 0
�� 0
Total Arrival Noise Events
39693
4300_
70
I 0
18 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
Departure Related Noise Events
February 2006
RMT
ID
City
Address
Departure
Events ?
65dB
Departure
Events �t
80dB
Departure
Events >_
90dB
Departure
Events >_
100dB
1
Minneapolis
Xerxes Ave. & 41st St.
830
36
1
0
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
1063
45
2
0
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
2310
140
31
0
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48tb St.
2594
174
12 I
0
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
8428
1616
432
28
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
10443
2701
647
11
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
5032
479
50
0
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
2657
226
3
0
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
15
1
0
0
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
7
1 1
0
0
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
17
0
0
0
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
20
0
0
0
13
Mendota. Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
730
27
1
0
14
Eagan
1 st St. & Mckee St.
789
1.09
11
0
15
Mendota Heights
Cuilon St. & Lexington Ave.
937
62
0
0
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
765
118
20
0
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
86
4
0
0
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave
862
50
0
0
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
691
17
0
0
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
238
6
0
0
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67tb St.
290
5
0
0
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
198
10
0
0
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
1370
231
36
0
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
509
34
1
0
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
31.5
5
1.
0
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
383
28
0
0
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 57571rving Ave. S.
2786
221
19
0
28
Richfield
6645 16th Avenue S.
4374
165
5
0
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
1986
82
1
0
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd
1113
167
18
0
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
148
3
0
0
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
64
4
1 0
0
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
435
21
0
0
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
251
5
0
0
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet In.
274
12
0
0
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
70
1
0
1 0
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
137
12
0
0
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
246
13
0
0
39
Eagan
3477 St Charles Pl.
219
4
0
0
Total Departure Noise Events
53682
6835
1291
39
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 19
32
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
Feb -06
(RMT Site# 1)
Xerxes Ave. & 41" St., Minneapolis
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
De arture
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/19/200616:53
CCP466
B72Q
D
30L
90.3
02/02/200616:58
CCP466
B72Q
D
30L
89.1
02/17/200610:26
CCP1102
B72Q
D
30L
88.1
02/20/200616:41
CCP1464
B72Q
D
30L
87.8
02/09/200617:32
CCP466
B72Q
D
30L
87.8
02/02/200616:13
CCP1462
B72Q
D
30L
85.5
02/10/200613:16
NWA19
B744
D
30L
85.3
02./19/200616:05
CCP1462
B72Q
D
30L
85.2
02/17/200613:21
NWA19
B744
D
30L
84.8
02/20/200611:15
CCP1102
B72Q
D
30L
84.3
(RMT Site#2)
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/01/200613:28
NWA19
B744
D
30L
90.7
02/20/200616:40
CCP1464
B72Q
D
30L
90.4
02/15/200613:28
NWA19
B744
D
30L
89.8
02/14/2006 08:59
CCI706
B72Q
D
30R
89.1
02/26/200613:31
NWA19
B744
D
30L
89.0
02/15/2006 23:37
CCI705
B72Q
D
30L
88.6
02/19/200616:04
CCP1462
B72Q
D
30L
87.9
02/17/200614:37
' NWA205W
DC9Q
D
30R
87.5
02/1.2/200615:46
NWA42
DC10
D
30L
87.4
02/06/200613:15'
NWA19
B744
D
30L
87.3
(RMT Site#3)
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave., Minneapolis
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/02/200616:57
CCP466
B72Q
D
30L
98.4
02/09/200617:32
CCP466
B72Q
D
30L
98.1
02/09/200616:36
CCP1462
B72Q
D
30L
97.3
02/02/200616:13
CCP1462
B72Q
D
30L
96.9
02/20/200616:40
CCP1464
B72Q
D
30L
96.1
02/17/200610:25
CCP1102
B72Q
D
30L
96.0
02/20/200611:14
CCP1102
B72Q
D
30L
95.6
02/19/2006 07:51
CCP1460
B72Q
D
30L
95.3
02/19/200616:52
CCP466
B72Q
D
30L
95.1
02/01/200613:28
NWA19
B744
D
30L
94.8
20 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
:3q
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
Feb -06
(RMT Site#4)
Park Ave. & 48th St., Minneapolis
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/01/2006 07:39
CCI706
B72Q
D
30L
95.8
02/22/200613:19
NWA19
B744
D
30L
93.4
02/16/200613:15
NWA19
B744
D
30L
92.8
02/25/200613:35
NWA19
B744
D
30L
92.2
02/14/2006 08:58
CCI706
B72Q
D
30R
92.0
02/05/200613:05
NWA19
B744
D
30L
92.0
02/25/2006 22:23
NWA1469
DC9Q
D
30R
91.0
02/03/2006 07:59
CCI706
B72Q
D
30R
90.9
02/12/2006 22:32
NWA1469
DC9Q
D
30R
90.9
1
02/24/2006 15:491
NWA42
DC10
D
301,
90.5
(RMT Site#5)
1It' AvP Ar iRt' qt Minneanolis
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/22/200615:34
NWA690
DC9Q
Departure
30R
102.1
02/26/200617:21
CCP420
B72Q
D
30L
103.8
02/01/200610:24
CCP1400
B72Q
D
30L
103.7
02/05/2006 08:49
CCP1452
B72Q
D
30L
103.5
02/19/200615:48
CCP420
B72Q
D
30L
102.8
02/20/2006 07:42
CCP1450
B72Q
D
30L
102.7
02/05/200616:03
CCP420
B72Q
D
30L
102.7
02/09/200616:50
CCP420
B72Q
D
30L
102.4
02/17/200610:25
CCP1102
B72Q
D
30L
1 102.1
02/20/200611:14
CCP1102
B72Q
D
30L
102.1
02/23/200615:40
CCP420
B72Q
D I
30L
102.0
(RMT Site#6)
25th Ave. & 57th St., Minneapolis
Date/Time Flight Number I Aircraft Type I Arrival/ I Runway Lmax (dB)
02/14/2006 08:58
CCI706
B72Q
D
30R
104.6
02/22/200615:34
NWA690
DC9Q
D
30R
102.1
02/24/200615:47
NWA132
DC9Q
D
30R
101.6
02/03/2006 07:58
CCI706
B72Q
D
30R
101.5
02/26/2006 21:501
NWA929
DC9Q
D
30R
100.7
02/26/200616:26
NWA497
DC9Q
D
30R
100.6
02/26/200617:45
NWA1053
DC9Q
D
30R
100.6
02/13/2006 21:11
NWA1957
DC9Q
D
30R
100.4
02/22/200614:50
NWA1951
DC9Q
D
30R
100.4
02/17/2006 17:291
NWA926 I
DC9Q I
D
30R
1 100.2
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 21
40
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
Feb -06
(RMT Site#7)
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St., Richfield
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/25/200616:06
CCP420
B72Q
D
30L
97.5
02/17/2006 09:05
CCP422
B72Q
D
30L
97.1
02/22/2006 08:35
CCP1410
B72Q
D
30L
97.0
02/16/200616:56
CCP420
B72Q
D
30L
96.8
02/08/2006 07:24
CCP436
B72Q
D
30L
96.4
02/04/200612:29
CCP1400
B72Q
D
30L
96.0
02/04/200612:27
RRR2112
DC9Q
D
30L
95.8
02/20/2006 23:41
XNA123
B72Q
D
30L
95.7
02/17/200616:04
CCP434
B72Q
D
30L
95.7
02/15/2006 07:11
CCP436
B72Q
D
30L
95.6
(RMT Site#8)
Longfellow Ave. & 43`d St., Minneapolis
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/04/200613:36
NWA754
DC9Q
D
30R
91.6
02/09/2006 23:37
CCI705
B72Q
D
30L
91.2
02/17/2006 08:14
Unknown
BE18
D
30R
90.7
02/16/2006 23:35
CCI705
B72Q
D
30L
89.9
02/22/2006 23:43
CCI705
B72Q
D
30L
89.7
02/04/200614:44
AAL827
MD80
D
30R
89.6
02/15/2006 21:23
NWA1843
DC9Q
D
30R
89.1
02/08/2006 09:08
AAL1127
MD80
D
30R
89.0
02/26/200615:03
NWA1951
DC9Q
D
30R
88.9
02/22/200615:35
NWA690
DC9Q
D
30R
88.4
(RMT Site#9)
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave., St. Paul
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
De arture
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/01/200623:45
CCI705
B72Q
D
30L
81.2
02/04/2006 07:32
BMJ48
BE80
D
30R
75.5
02/18/200617:48
NWA136
DC9Q
D
30L
71.4
02/17/2006 22:40
NWA760
A320
D
30R
70.2
02/21/2006 23:50
KHA772
B733
D
30L
69.8
02/27/2006 07:46
Unknown
BE18
D
17
69.5
02/27/2006 07:49
BMJ13
BE80
D
12R
68.9
02/22/2006 22:251
NWA354 I
B757
D
30R
68.5
22 A Product of the etropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
Feb -06
(RMT Site# 10)
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St. Paul
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
De arture
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/27/2006 07:46
Unknown
BE18
D
17
80.8
02/04/2006 07:31
BMJ48
BE80
D
30R
76.9
02/17/2006 20:17
Unknown
BE18
A
35
72.9
02/24/2006 09:26
TCA1
Unknown
D
12L
71.7
02/08/200610:43
MES2760
SF34
A
12L
70.3
(RMT Site# 11)
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/27/200607:46
Unknown
BE18
D
17
79.0
02/01/2006 23:45
CCI705
B72Q
D
30L
77.5
02/17/2006 20:16
Unknown
BE18
A
35
77.2
02/08/200614:32
MES3262
SF34
D
30R
75.8
02/01/200619:24
NWA1654
B757
D
30R
75.6
02/21/2006 23:50
KHA772
B733
D
30L
73.6
02/18/2006 01:42
KHA1850
B733
D
30L
72.4
02/13/2006 23:20
CCI705
B72Q
D
30L
72.2
02/17/2006 22:40
NWA760
A320
D
30R
71.5
02/01/200619:25
Unknown
SR22
D
30L
70.4
(RMT Site#12)
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave., St. Paul
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
De . arture
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/14/2006 00:03
TCA1
Unknown
D
12L
78.3
02/24/2006 07:24
BW62
BE80
D
12L
73.1
02/27/2006 21:35
Unknown
SR20
D
12R
73.0
02/28/2006 07:18
BMJ66
BE80
D
12R
71.8
02/28/2006'07:28
BMJ68
BE99
D
12L
71.5
02/28/2006 07:291
BMJ62 I
BE80
D
12L
70.1
02/24/2006 07:23
BMJ62
BE80
D
12L
68.7
02/27/2006 11:251
MES2759
SF34
D I
12L
L 66.7
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS P ogram 23
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
Feb -06
(RMT Site# 13)
Southeast End Of Mohican Court, Mendota Heights
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/09/2006 07:42
CCI706
B72Q
D
12R
90.4
02/26/200612:02
NWA99
DC10
D
12R
85.8
02/26/200610:59
AAL1435
MD80
D
12L
85.3
02/21/2006 21:59
NWA929
DC9Q
D
12L
85.1
02/26/2006 09:07
AAL1127
MD80
D
12L
83.4
02/09/200615:21
NWA1471
DC9Q
D
12L
83.0
02/27/2006 07:33
CCP9650
B72Q
D
12R
83.0
02/24/2006 09:37
AAL1127
MD80
D
12L
82.7
02/27/2006 09:12
AAL1127
MD80
D
12L
82.7
02/21/2006 22:30
NWA1469
DC9Q
D
12L
82.2
(RMT Site# 14)
1 st St. & Mckee St., Eagan
Date/Time .
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Runway
Lmax (dB)
Departure
02/02/200611:17
CCP468
B72Q
D
12R
93.4
02/26/2006 06:48
CCP1412
B72Q
D
12R
92.8
02/26/2006 08:41
CCP1452
B72Q
D
12R
92.5
02/28/200613:40
NWA19
B744
D
12R
92.5
02/02/200607:03
DHL1648
B72Q
D
12R
92.2
02/09/2006 06:22
CCP436
B72Q
D
12R
91.7
02/21/2006 21:02
DHL197
B72Q
D
12R
91.5
02/21/200613:18
NWA19
B744_
D
12R
90.3
02/24/200613:26
NWA19
B744
D
12R
90.1
02/27/200613:26
NWA19
B744
D
12R
90.1
(RMT Site#15)
C'i llnn qt_ Rr. Lexington Ave.. Mendota Heichts
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Runway
Lmax (dB)
De arture
02/21/2006 21:58
NWA929
DC9Q
D
12L
89.4
02/27/200617:15
NWA1053
DC9Q
D
12L
87.8
02/21/200613:08
NWA447
DC9Q
D
12L
87.4
02/26/2006 09:06
AAL1127
MD80
D
12L
87.3
02/27/2006 07:32
CCP9650
B72Q
D
12R
87.0
02/24/200614:21
NWA1205
DC9Q
D
12L
86.5
02/02/2006 07:31
NWA1000
DC9Q
D
12L
86.0
02/26/200610:59
AAL1435
MD80
D
12L
1 85.3
02/24/2006 09:37
AAL1127
MD80
D
12L
85.3
02/21/200614:39
NWA737
DC9Q I
D
12L
85.3
24 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
Feb -Q6
(RMT Site# 16)
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane, Eagan
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/27/2006 08:07
CCP402
B72Q
D
12R
97.6
02/24/200615:01
CCP428
B72Q
D
12R
97.4
02/27/200611:21
CCP434
B72Q
D
12R
96.9
02/02/2006 06:21
CCP436
B72Q
D
12R
96.6
02/27/2006 07:06
CCP1450
B72Q
D
12R
96.5
02/02/200611:17
CCP468
B72Q
D
12R
96.0
02/24/2006 07:19
CCP1450
B72Q
D
12R
95.3
02/26/2006 07:43
CCP1460
B72Q
D
12R
94.1
02/28/200613:39
NWA19
B744
D
12R
94.1
02/27/2006 06:08
CCP1490
B72Q
D
12R
1 93.6
(RMT Site#17)
84th St. & 4th Ave., Bloomington
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/13/2006 22:19
FDX1106
B72Q
D
30L
86.0
02/17/2006 22:47
NWA1839
DC9Q
D
30L
81.2
02/27/2006 20:34
TCA1
Unknown
D
12R
80.6
02/09/200619:37
NWA446
DC9Q
D
30L
80.0
02/01/2006 23:27
XNA123
B72Q
D
30L
79.8
02/22/200619:04
NWA1674
DC9Q
D
30L
79.8
02/08/2006 06:47
BNU56
BE80
D
30L
79.6
02/17/2006 22:27
FDX2618
DC10
D
30L
78.5
02/17/2006 22:31
NWA974
DC9Q
D
30L
78.2
02/17/2006 22:101
UPS559 I
A300
D
30L
76.9
(RMT Site# 18)
75th St. & 17th Ave, Richfield
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/24/200615:20
AAL1118
1VID80
A
30L
88.8
02/27/200610:13
NWA498
DC9Q
D
17
83.6
02/09/200612:53
NWA1280
DC9Q
D
17
83.5
02/24/200610:27
NWA1202
DC9Q
D
17
82.8
02/28/200613:44
NWA130
DC9Q
D
17
82.5
02/02/2006 08:13
CCP1460
B72Q
D
17
82.3
02/24/200611:35
NWA128
DC9Q
D
17
82.3
02/28/2006 07:26
CCI706
B72Q
D
17
82.3
02/02/2006 08:34
AAL631
MD80
D
17
82.2
02/02/2006 09:25
NWA410
DC9Q
D 1
17
82.1
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 25
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for, MSI'
Feb -06
(RMT Site# 19)
16th Ave. & 84th St., Bloomington
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
De arture
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/27/200620:34
TCA1
Unknown
D
12R
85.7
02/15/2006 20:36
TCA1
Unknown
D
17
85.2
02/24/200611:36
NWA128
DC9Q
D
17
84.9
02/02/200610:59
NWA768-
DC9Q
D
17
83.4-
02/21/2006 20:47
TCA1
Unknown
D
17
83.2
02/27/2006 08:39
MES3337
CRJ
D
17
82.3
02/22/2006 06:55
BMJ64
BE80
D
30L
82.2
02/01/2006 20:22
TCA1
Unknown
D
17
81.9
02/24/2006 07:32
BMJ64
BE80
D
17
81.5
02/27/200613:35
NWA856
DC9Q
D
17
81.5
(RMT Site#20)
75th St. & 3rd Ave., Richfield
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
De parture
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/13/2006 22:18
FDX1106
B72Q
D
30L
88.2
02/28/2006 07:33
MES3337
CRJ
D
17
87.3
02/09/200614:55
CCP437
B72Q
A
12L
85.1
02/08/2006 06:46
BW56
BE80
D
30L
81.8
02/14/2006 07:35
MES3091
SF34
D
30R
81.0
02/24/200615:21
AAL1118
MD80
A
30L
80.4
02/09/20.0619:37
NWA446
DC9Q
D
30L
80.2
02/03/2006 06:48
BMJ56
BE80
D
30L
80.0
02/14/200615:23
CHQ5341
E145
D
30L
79.8
02/14/2006 09:49
MES3020
SF34
D
30L
79.6
(RMT Site#21)
Barbara Ave. & 67th St., Inver Grove Heights
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
De arture
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/17/200611:35
MES3691
RJ85
A
30R
87.4
02/09/200614:00
NWA1080
DC9Q
D
12L
82.1
02/28/200610:22
NWA1840
DC9Q
D
12L
82.1
02/21/2006 22:31
NWA1469
DC9Q
D
12L
80.7
02/02/2006 07:03
CCI706
B72Q
D
12R
80.2
02/28/200614:00
NWA734
DC9Q
D
12L
80.0
02/24/2006 09:48
NWA1212
DC9Q
D
12L
79.8
02/21/200613:06
NWA734
DC9Q
D
12L
79.6
02/26/200611:04
NWA454
DC9Q
D
12R
79.5
02/28/200610:48
NWA1946
DC9Q
D
12L
79.2
26 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
Feb -06
(RMT Site#22)
•1 T /�___ _ TT_�_i_1
Date/Time
Anne iviane Iraii, Inver
Flight Number Aircraft Type
vrove rneigIiL5
Arrival/
De , arture
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/02/200611:18
CCP468
B72Q
D
D
12R
86.4
02/21/2006 21:02
DHL197
B72Q
D
12L
12R
84.5
02/03/200611:44
02/27/2006 22:19
NWA1048
FDX1106
A319
B72Q
A
D
96.2
30L
12R
83.6
82.7
02/17/200613:28
CCP1491
B72Q
A
02/09/200615:52
30L
82.5
02/14/2006 09:24
02/14/2006 09:241
NWA1840
NWA1840
DC9Q
DC9Q
A
A
NWA408
30R
30R
82.3
82.3
02/26/2006 06:49
CCP1412
B72Q
D
DC9Q
DC9Q
12R
82.2
02/08/2006 07:48
NWA795
DC9Q
A
D
30L
82.2
02/02/2006 07:04
DHL1648
B72Q
D
12L
12R
81.9
(RMT Site#23)
End of Kenndon Avenue, Mendota Heights
Date/Time I
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/02/200610:26
NWA748
DC9Q
D
12L
98.0
02/21/2006 21:58
NWA929
DC9Q
D
12L
97.2
02/02/200612:07
NWA750
DC9Q
D
12L
96.2
02/21/200614:51
NWA1951
DC9Q
D
12L
95.6
02/09/200615:52
NWA690
DC9Q
D
12L
94.6
02/21/2006 21:39
NWA408
DC9Q
D
12L
94.5
02/21/200616:53
02/21/200622:30
NWA1053
NWA1469
DC9Q
DC9Q
D
D
12L
12L
93.9
93.6
02/26/200611:57
NWA1047
DC9Q
D
12L
93.5
02/02/200613:05
NWA1895
DC9Q I
D
12L
92.8
(RMT Site#24)
Chapel Lane & Wren Lane, Eagan
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
De arture
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/02/200611:17
CCP468
B72Q
D
12R
90.5
02/06/200611:57
NWA614
A320
A
30L
89.0
02/03/200613:53
MES3671
RJ85
A
30R
88.4
02/21/2006 21:02
DHL197
B72Q
D
12R
88.4
02/26/2006 06:48
CCP1412
B72Q
D
12R
87.5
02/09/2006 06:22
CCP436
B72Q
D
12R
87.0
02/02/2006 06:22
CCP436
B72Q
D
12R
86.9
02/03/200614:01
UAL1200
B735
A
30R
86.6
02/25/2006 08:29
FLG5625
CRj
A
30R
85.7
02/02/2006 07:031
DHL1648
B72Q
D
12R
85.5
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMSroogram 27
1 "'C
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
Feb -06
(RMT Site#25)
Moonshine Park, 1321 Jurdy Rd., Eagan
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/02/200613:18
NWA19
B744
D
12R
90.7
02/24/200615:02
CCP428
B72Q.
D
12R
83.8
02/16/2006 22:20
SCX206
B738
A
30L
83.3
02/10/200613:29
CCP1491
B72Q
A
30L
82.3
02/10/200613:25
FFT102
A318
A
30L
81.9
02/22/2006 03:31
MDS120
SW3
D
12R
81.8
02/10/200613:27
COM493
CRJ
A
30L
81.1
02/02/2006 21:28
SCX248
B738
A
30L
81.0
02/08/200611:07
AAL1435
MD80
D
12R
80.8
02/13/2006 08:17
NWA410
DC9Q
A
30L
80.5
(RMT Site#26)
6796 Arkansas Ave. W., Inver Grove Heights
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/09/200613:10
NWA19
B744
D
12R
86.2
02/24/2006 06:23
CCP432
B72Q
D
12R
85.7
02/02/2006 09:14
Unknown
GLF2
D
12R
84.9.
02/21/2006.23:11
CCI705
B72Q
D
12R
84.5
02/27/2006 21:03
DHL197
B72Q
D
12R
84.5
02/14/2006 20:41
AAL1554
MD80
A
30R
84.0
02/24/2006 07:24
C0706
B72Q
D
12R
83.9
02/02/2006 07:03
CCI706
B72Q
D
12R
83.6
02/24/200613:26
NWA19
B744
D
12R
83.0
02/21/2006 22:39
DHL304
B720
D
12R
83.0
(RMT Site#27)
Anthony Middle School, 5757 Irving Ave. S., Minneapolis
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/11/200615:57
CCP420
B72Q
D
30L
97.2
02/08/2006 09:27
CCP1400
B72Q
D
30L
97.1
02/26/200617:22
CCP420
B72Q
D
30L
97.1
02/16/200616:22
CCP1462_
B72Q
D
30L
96.3
02/12/2006 06:50
CCP436
B72Q
D
30L
94.5
02/12/2006 09:03
CCP1452
B72Q
D
30L
94.4
02/25/2006 07:30
CCP1410
B72Q
D
30L
94.0
02/16/200617:49
CCP466
B72Q
D
30L
93.1
02/16/2006 07:48
CCP1460
B72Q
D
30L
92.9
02/04/2006 07:22
CCP436
B72Q
D
30L
92.5
28 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
'41
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
Feb -06
(RMT Site#28)
6645 16th Avenue S., Richfield
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
De arture
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/24/2006 21:12
DHL197
B72Q
D
30L
95.9
02/02/2006 22:00
ABX333
DC9Q
D
30L
93.4
02/17/200614:31
NWA494
DC9Q
D
30L
92.9
02/17/2006 21:15
DHL197
B72Q
D
30L
92.6
02/11/200618:52
NWA1674
DC9Q
D
30L
91.5
02/09/200619:37
NWA446
DC9Q
D
30L
89.3
02/01/2006 06:54
DHL1648
B72Q
D
30L
88.9
02/24/200619:01
NWA1674
DC9Q
D
30L
88.5
02/22/2006 20:59
DHL197
B72Q
D
30L
1 88.4
02/17/200614:11
DAL553
MD80
D
30L
88.1
(RMT Site#29)
Ericsson Elementary School, 4315 31st Ave. S., Minneapolis
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/17/200611:36
AAL1435
MD80
D
30R
91.0
02/22/200617:24
NWA926
DC9Q
D
30R
89.5
02/02/200616:58
NWA926
DC9Q
D
30L
88.7
02/16/2006 07:43
AAL1487
MD80
D
30R
88.4
02/04/200611:15
AAL1435
1,,M80
D
30R
88.3
02/13/2006 09:17
AAL1127
MD80
D
30R
87.8
02/24/20,0617:33
NWA926
DC9Q
D
30R
87.7
02/02/200618:38
UAL762
A319
D
30R
86.9
02/03/2006 07:20
AAL1487
MD80
D
30R
86.4
02/13/2006 23:201
CCI705
B72Q
D
30L
85.7
(RMT Site#30)
8715 River Ridge Rd., Bloomington
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/27/200617:00
NWA1967
DC9Q
D
17
92.1
02/21/200617:21
NWA1967
DC9Q
D
17
92.1
02/09/2006 07:50
CCP1460
B72Q
D
17
92.1
02/02/2006 08:14
CCP1460
B72Q
D
17
91.4
02/08/200613:46
NWA409
DC9Q
D
17
91.3
02/27/2006 07:12
NWA122
DC9Q
D
17
91.2
02/26/200613:47
NWA130
DC9Q
D
17
91.1
02/27/200617:27
NWA1289
DC9Q
D
17
91.0
02/27/200611:31
NWA1055
DC9Q
D
17
90.6
02/21/2006 13:451
NWA130
DC9Q
D
17
90.6
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 29
H 9
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP -
Feb -06
(RMT Site#31)
9501 12th Ave. S., Bloomington
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
De -)arture
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/24/2006 20:57
TCA1
Unknown
D
17
87.3
02/24/2006 07:33
BMJ64
BE80
D
17
84.1
02/17/2006 22:47
NWA1839
DC9Q
D
30L
81.2
02/22/200619:05
NWA1674
DC9Q
D
30L
79.7
02/19/2006 22:35
NWA974
DC9Q
D
30L
79.3
02/21/200612:05
NWA777
B757
D
17
78.2
02/09/2006 21:04
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
78.1
02/09/200619:38
NWA446
DC9Q
D
3IL
1 78.1
02/24/200611:42
MES3191
SF34
D
17
78.0
02/24/2006 09:491
NWA883
A320
D
17
77.9
(RMT Site#32)
10325 Pleasant Ave. S., Bloomington
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/24/200616:01
CCP434
B720
D
30L
84.3
02/13/2006 22:19
FDX1106
B72Q
D
30L
81.3
02/24/200615:27
NWA1170
DC9Q
D
30L
81.2
02/04/2006 05:32
DAL965
B73Q
D
30L
80.2
02/24/2006 07:33
BMT64
BE80
D
17
79.5
02/11/2006 07:22
CCP436
B72Q
D
30L
78.4
02/13/2006 23:42
XNA123
B72Q
D
30L
77.2
02/14/200610:57
NWA1174
DC9Q
D
30L
77.2
02/09/2006 20:07
NWA1208
DC9Q
D
30L
76.6
02/22/2006 16:511
L1073
MD80
D
30L
76.4
(RMT Site#33)
North River Hills Park, Burnsville
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/02/2006 08:15
CCP1460
B72Q
D
17
89.3
02/09/2006 07:51
CCP1460
B72Q
D
17
85.2
02/09/200611:00
CCP468
B72Q
D
17
84.4
02/02/2006 07:07
KHA712
B72Q
D
17
83.1
02/28/2006 07:27
CCI706
B72Q
D
17
82.6
02/08/200611:33
NWA1441
DC9Q
D
17
82.5
02/27/200612:09
AAL1316
MD80
D
17
82.4
02/24/2006 07:21
CCP1450
B72Q
D
12R
82.0
02/02/2006 08:36
AAL631
MD80
D
17
81.8
02/24/200613:04
NWA1148
DC9Q
D
17
81.8
30 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
4q
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
Feb -06
(RMT Site#34)
Red Oak Park, Burnsville
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/02/2006 08:15
CCP1460
B72Q
D
17
83.7
02/27/2006 07:13
NWA122
DC9Q
D
17
82.9
02/21/2006.14:36
NWA973
DC9Q
D
17
81.5
02/24/200614:46
NWA973
DC9Q
D
17
81.0
02/22/200617:30
NWA136
DC9Q
D
17
80.3
02/26/200611:50
NWA1079
DC9Q
D
17
79.5
02/02/200610:33
NWA1840
DC9Q
D
17
79.4
02/22/200615:40
NWA1287
DC9Q
D
17
79.4
02/09/200614:02
Unknown
PA32
D
12R
79.3
02/02/2006 09:28
NWA411
DC9Q
D 1
17
79.1
(RMT Site#35)
2100 Garnet Ln., Eagan
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/21/200618:05
RAX222
LJ25
D
17
85.0
02/24/2006 07:20
CCP1450
B72Q
D
12R
84.0
02/02/200615:00
AAL827
MD80
D
17
82.6
02/13/200614:02
NWA133
A319
A
35
82.2
02/22/200617:05
AAL1975
MD80
D
17
82.1
02/28/200613:36
NWA856
DC9Q
D
17
81.7
02/20/200613:19
Unknown
FA50
A
35
81.6
02/27/2006 07:17
DAL199
MD80
D
17
81.1
02/24/200615:57
NWA502
DC9Q
D
17
80.9
02/08/2006 20:181
BW61
BE80
A
35
80.8
(RMT Site#36)
Briar Oaks & Scott Pond, Apple Valley
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/27/200616:34
CCP1464
B72Q
D
12R
83.8
02/03/200612:35
FLG2860
CRJ
A
35
83.3
02/20/200613:02
CHQ5338
E145
A
35
82.7
02/07/2006 08:07
NWA1629
A320
A
35
82.3
02/23/200612:24
MES2725
SF34
A
35
81.9
02/15/2006 07:54
MES2750
SF34
A
35
81.6
02/17/200618:15
FDX728
DC10
A
35
81.5
02/22/2006 08:04
NWA121
A319
A
35
80.8
02/26/200615:55
NWA449
DC9Q
A
35
80.5
02/17/2006 17:341
MES2708
SF34
A
35
1 80.2
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 31
15D
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
Feb -06
(RMT Site#37)
4399 Woodgate Ln. N., Eagan
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/02/200611:14
AAL1435
MD80
D
17
82.2
02/21/200617:23
AAL1975
MD80
D
17
82.2
02/26/2006 08:47
TAG399
GLF3
D
12R
82.2
02/27/2006 07:17
DAL199
MD80
D
17
82.1
02/24/200610:41,
NWA454
DC9Q
D
17
81.6
02/24/200611:37
NWA128
DC9Q
D
17.
81.1
02/24/2006 09:11
CCP422
B72Q
D
12R
80.8
02/21/200614:51
AAL827
MD80
D
17
80.8
02/27/200619:34
NWA1043
DC9Q
D
17
80.7
02/27/200619:44
NWA732
DC9Q
D
17
80.6
(RMT Site#38)
3957 Turquoise Cir., Eagan
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/09/2006 07:15
CCP1412
B72Q
D
17
89.0
02/02/200611:14
AAL1435
MD80
D
17
84.0
02/27/200611:57
NWA605
DC9Q
D
17
83.5
02/24/2006 07:34
NWA1284
DC9Q
D
17
81.8
02/28/200615:34
NWA1170
DC9Q
D
17
81.2
02/21/200618:05
RAX222
LJ25
D
17
81.1
02/02/200611:00
NWA768
DC9Q
D
17
80.9
02/24/200610:29
NWA1202
DC9Q
D
17
80.8
02/21/200614:51
AAL827
MD80
D
17
80.6
02/27/2006 07:27
NWA1284
DC9Q
D
17
80.2
(RMT Site#39)
3477 St. Charles Pl., Eagan
Date/Time
Flight Number
Aircraft Type
Arrival/
Departure
Runway
Lmax (dB)
02/28/2006 09:13
AAL1127
MD80
D
17
83.7
02/27/200610:52
NWA508
DC9Q
D
17
83.6
02/08/200611:16
NWA125
DC9Q
D
17
81.6
02/21/200613:40
NWA856
DC9Q
D
17
80.8
02/23/200617:50
FFT100
A319
A
35
80.4
02/08/200611:42
NWA128
DC9Q
D
17
78.6
02/27/200613:09
NWA1868
DC9Q
D
17
78.6
02/21/200619:39
NWA1208
DC9Q
D
17
78.6
02/27/200610:54
NWA1946
DC9Q
D
17
78.5
02/21/200613:46
NWA1868
DC9Q
D
17
78.5
February 2006 Remote Monitoring Tower Tor) Ten Summa
The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for February 2006 were comprised of 90.6%
departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the 8727 Hushed with 33.9% of the highest
Lmax events.
February 2006 Technical Advisor Report Notes
Unknown fields are due to unavailability of FAA flight track data. Missing FAA radar data for 0.0 days during the
month of February 2006.
32 A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
�I
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dBA
February 2006
Remote Monitoring Towers
Date
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
#14
#15
1
50.9
53.9
60.1
60.9
73.1
73.6
65.4
59.4
51.1
34.1
47.0
31.2
4 3. 33
64.2
44.9
2
58.5
59.5
1 66.5
62.7
73.3
73.5
65.4
59.8
33.8
1 n/a
38.7
25.8
56.6
65.2
61.0
3
52.0
53.2
56.1
58.9
69.6
73.1
65.7
58.6
n/a
I n/a
29.7
32.9
n/a
61.8
47.3
4
51.9
50.5
57.7
55.5
71.4
70.5
65.71
58.2
36.2
38.6
38.7
34.9
38.8
57.8
41.0
5
54.7
55.5
56.2
57.7
72.0
69.8
61.3
55.2
35.2
29.9
40.7
n/a
n/a
57.6
25.6
6
50:9
52.1
55.8
58.5
70.0
69.8
62.7
55.6
26.1
ni"a
n/a
33.8
34.3
56.8
42.0
7
53.2
53.8
60.0
60.9
70.8
71.4
66.0
58.9
n/a
n/a
26.8
n/a
46.4
57.8
49.1
8
49.1
52.2
58.4
56.9
69.8
70.6
65.3
60.9
n/a
36.2
34.4
39.0
44.6
57.9
46.8
9
56.4
58.01
65.1
61.4
71.2
73.5
64.7
62.3
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1 55.8
65.0
58.0
10
56.4
54.6
63.3
61.8
73.8
73.1
66.2
57.8
27.7
11/a
n/a
n/a
31.4
62.8
51.9
11
55.1
52.0
58.6
56.9
72.1
70.61
65.5
57.6
n/a
n/a
n/a
i1ra
n/a
60.1
1 32.3
12
50. 1
53.8
58.5
60.61
71.7
71.3
61.8
56.01
40.71
41.3
35.2
n/a
41.5
59.0
34.2
13
51.9
53.7
60.9
59.2
72.2
72.2
66.1
59.0
n/a
n/a
44.2
n/a
46.6
60.9
42.5
1.4
54.1
55.4
57.6
58.3
69.3
73.1
66.1
59.5
n/a
32.2
36.3
1 45.5
35.4
62.0
48.4
15
53.7
59.3
59.1
56.7
71.1
71.1
64.0
58.3
n/a
38.6
n/a
31.8
41.4
57.4
33.6
16
50.6
51.1
56.7
59.2
71.9
71.3
67.6
61.9
n/a
lva
n/a
i.iia
27.41
58.5
1 34.5
17
56.1
53.6
64.9
58.9
72.5
72.4
67.8
61.5
39.6
35.7
43.4
33.1
41.3
61.3
1 34.7
18
51.7
53.8
59.2
58.3
70.4
70.5
63.2
57.6
32.3
n/a
41.9
n/a
39.2
61.4
34.8
19
54.0
53.9
60.5
55.8
71.0
68.81
61.4
54.1 1
27.0
n/a
n/a
n/a
47.9
61.3
40.3
20
54.4
53.5
1 63.3
57.71
73.1
71.3
68.2
58.3
36.3
n/a
n/a
33.9
36.7
60.3
1 43.9
21
56.1
57.9
62.2
59.8
69.1
69.3
58.2
59.0
39.6
n/a
43.6
»/a
59.0
65.7
60.8
22
54.6
55.8
59.7
60.4
73.4
72.7
69.8
62.2
36.7
nia
n/a
29.9
36.2
62.1
47.8
23
54.3
52.5
60.9
61.5
74.9
71.1
68.8
58.5
n/a
ji/a
n/a
36.9
31.7
60.4
34.5
24
56.5
58.1
65.1
61.2
71..4
70.4
63.8
55.2
n/a
30.0
n/a
34.6
56.2
63.1
56.9
25
55.6
53.5
54.9
60.7
72.4
72.0
65.7
57.8
29.3
n/a
n/a
n/a
36.5
58.8
32.4
26
53.5
55.6
59.9
59.0
72.7
71.4
62.3
59.0
36.9
n/a
n/a
n/a
51.0
65.1
53.4
27
57.8
59.4
66.6
60.3
70.6
67.0
40.8
26.0
32.0
41.0
39.8
33.9
58.9
65.5
59.6
28
59.2
60.7
66.9
63.7
70.9
69.2
44.6
48.8
28.4
28.5
n/a
36.7
57.2
65.2
59.1
Mo. Ldn
54.8
55.8
62.0
59.9
71.9
71.5
65.3
58.7
38.3133.01
38.2
34.3151.31
62.1
53.4
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program 33
sc%v
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dBA
February 2006
Remote Monitoring Towers
Date
#16
#17
#18
4191
#20
#21
422
#23
#24
#25
#26
#27
#28
#29
1
67.5
52.4
50.3
50.0
1
49.0
n/a
59.1.
54.3
63.4
45.1
48.7
70.8
62.5
68.4
2
69.1
29.4
55.7
52.8
48.5 1
52.2
60.1
66.1
63.3
54.6
56.5
61.8
64.6
57.5
3
67.9
46.1
44.5
35.3
49.4
39.6
57.8
52.4
62.3
42.8
47.1
58.6
60.9
56.3
4
64.3
28.8
39.0
33.5
38.1
44.9
55.3
48.0
58.5
39.3
40.5
60.21
58.0
53.7
5
64.5
46.6
37.4
27.0
46.3
37.4
53.5
43.8
57.5
34.0
40.6
60.3
57.4
52.2
6
64.4
43.0 144.7
43.5 1
36.6
33.6
50.2
48.2
55.8
45.5
36.2
57.6
57.9
53.3
7
63.3
39.7
52.5
48.0
47.4
45.9
52.4
56.4
56.4
37.5
48.2
56.0
61.7
52.9
8
64.01
52.0
52.1
49.5
52.8
45.7
53.6
53.9
57.5
44.9
47.1.
58.9
60.0
52.9
9
67.8
45.8
55.7
53.4
49.2
48.7
58.4
63.7
62.5
53.1.
52.1
57.1
61.1
55.8
10
67.7
33.8
37.0
34.8
38.7
n/a
60.1
53.1
62.3
50.8
65.3
63.2
60.6
55.1
11
65.6
36.3
40.8
28.1
45.0
37.4
57.3
47.8
59.4
42.6
46.8
60.1
60.1
53.1
12
64.3
n/a
42.6
50.1
39.6
38.9
56.0
46.1
58.7
43.61
45.1
65.0
57.7
55.2
13
65.8
58.1
47.4
49.9
60.2
47.5
57.2
54.8
.60.4
49.5
50.9
61.8
61.7
59.3
14
67.0
45.4
3 8. 31
31.8
49.5
34.6
58.9
58.2
62.0
49.8
49.5
57.6
60.4
59.0
15
64.8
46.0
49.7
49.4
47.2
41.7
54.4
33.8
58.3
38.9
42.2
57.6
58.0
54.7
16
66.4
46.1
38.3
35.4
50.2
45.8
54.2
42.3
58.2
49.7
41.4
61.3
60.3
53.9
17
68.1
55.7
45.1
45.1
54.2
48.6
56.9
49.2
58.1.
40.6
49.3
60.7
62.5
59.9
18
67,6
40.1
n/a
30.5
37.7
43.8
55.8
50.6
58.9
37.3
44.5
55.7
55.7
53.3
19
66.3
40.8
28.2
40.0
44.8
41.9
54.2
48.4
59.2
41.6
47.2
57.7
54.2
52.3
20
65.7
n/a
40.1
35.7
48.8
38.4
56.5
51.0
59.9
43.2
46.8
59.6
61.3
58.1
21
68.9
40.8
54.1
51.8
42.4
53.8.
57.7
68.0
62.7
56.4
59.0
56.4
57.4
54.0
22
67.5
47.8
53.5
53.9
51.9
36.1
59.4
54.5
62.2
52.8
47.8
63.3
62.8
59.3
23
65.9
45.6
46.3
45.8
! 46.0
31.3
57.5
44.9
60.5
42.3
41.8
63.2
62.5
56.3
24
67.9
42.3
53.4
46.6
50.9
57.1
63.2
60.8
50.6
58.8
55.8
62.1
54.1
25
64.9
38.5
J42
39.8
46.5
43.0
55.1
34.9
58.4
46.2
42.2
59.5
59.5
51.8
26
65.5
36.7
47.0
38.3
46.3
58.6
59.4
61.5
45.2
51.5
62.9
59.5
54.1.
27
68.7
38.6
56.4
54.7
38.7
51.8
57.5
65.4
61..7'
54.6
60.2
39.9
59.4
n/a
28
65.9
47.6
56.5
54.1
47.9
54.5
55.8
65.4
60.3
58.2
59.1
38.5
58.1
34.8
Mo. Ldn
66..6
48.2
5.0.9
49..1
49.9
47.2
57.0
59.6
60S
50.2
54.8
61.5
60.5
57.7
34 A Product oftheMetropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
Analysis of Aircraft Noise ]vents - Aircraft Ldn dBA
February 2006
Remote Monitoring Towers
Date
#30
31
#32
333435
36
37
38
f39
1
48.0
50.0
27.7
26.2
26.0
50.1
48.7
n1a
n/a
nla
2
61.3
41.1
50.0
54.7
52.1
53.7
51.2
48.1
50.9
49.7
3
47.2
46.1
27.6
n/a
28.8
49.9
52.2
38.6
28.3
n/a
4
46.5
38.4
51.3
48.0
42.5
49.3
51.0
40.3
40.5
32.6
5
45.3
41.8
37.7
39.8
38.9
48.8
50.4
41.7
31.8
1 28.7
6
44.9
34.4
47.0
n/a
n/a
1 49.2
50.4
29.8
n,/a
n a
7
59.7
41.0
n/a
46.1
46.2
51.8
52.0
44.0
45.1
40.2
8
56.9
42.91
32.2
48.0
38.7
48.51
50.1
43.4
45.1
43.3
9
60.4
46.8
43.9
52.5
45.7
46.7
43.1
46.1
50.6
45.6
10
48.2
26.2
25.21
28.1
27.8
50.3
52.6
n/a
n/a
27.7
11
47.7
37.7
40.9
n/a
n/a
50.3
52.3
n/a
n/a
n/a
12
55.3
n/a
rv'a
43.4
36.5
50.1
51.9
n/a
40.1
25.3
13
48.6
50.4
55.2
45.0
40.0
52.3
53.1
39.4
n/a
n/a
14
46.7
42.0
40.3
29.4
32.8
1 51.3
51.5
41.8
n/a
n/a
15
59.3
50.9
39.4
51.2
42.4
47.0
50.1
n/a
n/a
39.7
16
46.4
47.7
n/a
46.0
36.1
49.4
51.3
n/a
nVa
n/a
17
54.0
54.7
42.3
45.8
41.3
55.2
57.0
45.9
n/a
36.0
18
43.8
37.9
n/a
38.5
n/a
47.4
50.1
35.3
n/a
n/a
19
44.7
47.8
41.6
1 n/a
36.4
49.1
49.3
1 43.1
n/a
n/a
20
50.6
35.7
42.2
33.5
31.1
51.7
52.4
26.8
n/a
29.5
21
60.2
47.0
43.7
49.3
47.9
51.4
46.4
47.7
49.7
49.4
22
59.3
49.3
50.2
48.6
46.7
56.1
55.3
38.4
33.2
n/a
23
50.7
49,01
40.3
28.5
27.6
50.0
51.4
40.0
n/a
41.3
24
61.0
49.0
49.2
52.1
48.3
52.1
1 51.7
48.3
51.0
48.1
25
45.1
36.3
n/a
39.7
1 27.4
48.1
49.1
39.6
41.9
36.4
26
56.3
37.8
46.6
46.3
46.0
49.6
51.2
43.7
42.8
42.2
27
62.6
44.7
1-1/a
53.1
48.3
47.5
46.7
50.1
51.7
48.4
28
61.1
1 51.7
32.9
52.8
49.2
49.1
41.1
48.3
49.6
Mo. Ldn
56.6
47.0
45.5
47.8
44.0
50.9
51.4
43.4
44.7'
�4t28
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANO S Program 35
02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006
Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport
asp
*This report is for in f rmational purposes only
and cannot be used for enforcement purposes.
1227 Carrier Jets Departed Runway 17 - 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006
. . . .
'_4
ell,
Sad
r
! -' N., II._.
7 35 U3 tal- M!, _:pr
. . . .
XX
....
Runway 17 Departure Overflight GridAnalysis
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 0210112006-02128I2006
so
Runwav 17 Carrier Jet Der)arture Ouerations - 02/01/2006-02/28/2006
0 1217 (99.2%) West Bound Carrier Jet -A"' 10 (0.8%) Carrier Jet Departure
Departure Operations Flying the Runway 17 Jet Operations Turned West Before Passing Over the
'Departure Procedure (Passing Over the 2.5 NM Runway 17 2.5 NM Turn Point. This is 1.6% of 612
Turn Point) and Runway 17 East Bound Carrier Jet westbound departures.
Departure Operation
' west S�1k: ��1E lit-,aig m:�
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport Gate Plot
Runway 17 Departures That Turned West Be#ore 2.5NM Turn Point
02101/2006 00:00:00 - 02/2812006 23:59:59
10 Tracks Crossed Gate: Lef#=0(0%), Right= 20(100%)
18uG
0
1100
0
* l000 O
m O
U.
y O 0
� Ssoi
au
m
g :2�
a
110.
a
0
90D Q
ON
-1.2 -1A .2 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0,0 0 0.4 0.5 0,8 1.0 1.2
(Runway End) (Corridor End)
Deviation From Center or Gate (MOes)
r0+err
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 0210112006-0212812006 -2-
Minneapolis-St.
2 -
5
' west S�1k: ��1E lit-,aig m:�
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport Gate Plot
Runway 17 Departures That Turned West Be#ore 2.5NM Turn Point
02101/2006 00:00:00 - 02/2812006 23:59:59
10 Tracks Crossed Gate: Lef#=0(0%), Right= 20(100%)
18uG
0
1100
0
* l000 O
m O
U.
y O 0
� Ssoi
au
m
g :2�
a
110.
a
0
90D Q
ON
-1.2 -1A .2 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0,0 0 0.4 0.5 0,8 1.0 1.2
(Runway End) (Corridor End)
Deviation From Center or Gate (MOes)
r0+err
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 0210112006-0212812006 -2-
Minneapolis-St.
2 -
Runway 17 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006
EF1.swigF�;il :v.�ssPsivaa �,,
Men
I � a � �� rt r Surrfr=h Lai *1✓�"' _ �;;1 � "`_?`""'�
a
a
`�,� �� ��
...j:. f _ .- ..
It S l KF ffL
Mp
f
1 t
s
3 F,i j[s
I Fr
j �L
s
1�{fo,94 �Svi FAKE � � � . ..� —• 1 . t
t
r ,
sg tT.- ley
Wl
IA
r�
0 Nightime Carrier Jet Departure Operations off of
Runway 17 in 02/01/2006 - 02/28/2006 (10:30 p.m.-6:00a.m.)
0 (0%) West Bound Carrier Jet 0 (0%) West Bound Carrier Jet
Departures Turned West Between 2.5 and 3.0 NM Departures Turned West After 3.0 NM from Start of
from Start of Takeoff and Remained Over the Takeoff and Remained Over the Minnesota River
Minnesota River Valley (trending with Runway 17 Valley (trending with Runway 17 River Departure
River Departure Heading) I Procedure)
�'� 0 (0%) Carrier Jet Departures Turned_ 0 (0%) Remaining West Bound Carrier
West Before Passing Over the Runway 17 2.5 NM Jet Departures Flew the Runway, 17 Jet Departure
Turn Point Procedure (Passing Over the 2.5 NM Turn Point),
and with an enroute heading to the destination
airport
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 02/01/2006-0212612006 -3-
5?
3-
Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations
Runway 17-35 RMT's
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 0210112006-0212812006 -4-
G9
4-G9
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Levels - DNL dBA 02/01/2006-02/28/2006
Date
#30
#31
2
433
#34
#35 1
.#36
#37
#38
#39
1
48
50
E27.7
26.2
26
50.1 48.7 NA
NA
NA
2
61.3
41.1
50
54.7
52.1
53.7
51.2
48.1
50.9
49.7
3
47.2
46.1
27.6
NA
28.8
49.9
52.2
38.6
28.3
NA
4
46.5
38.4
51.3
48
42.5
49.3
51
40.3
40.5
32.6
5
45.3
41.8
37.7
39.8
38.9
48.8
L50,L
41.7
31.8
28.7
6
44.9
34.4
47
NA
NA
49.2
50.4
29.8
NA
NA
7
59.7
41
NA
46.1
46.2
51.8
52
44
45.1
40.2
8
56.9
42.9
32.2
48
38.7
48.5
50.1
43.4
45.1
43.3
9
60.4
46.8
43.9
52.5
' 45.7
46.7
43.1
46.1
50.6
45.6
10
48.2
26.2
25.2
28.1
27.8
50.3
52.6
NA
NA
27.7
11
47.7
37.7
40.9
NA
NA
50.3
52.3
NA
NA
NA
12
55.3
NA
NA
43.4
136.5
50.1
51.9
NA
40.1
25.3
13
48.6
50.4
55.2
45
' 40
52.3
53.1
39.4 1
NA
NA
14
46.7
42
40.3
29.4
32.8
51.3
51.5
41.8
NA
NA
15
59.3
50.9
39.4
51.2
42.4
47
50.1
NA
NA
39.7
16
46.4
47.7
NA
46
36.1
49.4
51.3
NA
NA
NA
17
54
54.7
42.3
45.8
41.3
55.2
57
45.9
NA
36
18
43.8
37.9
NA
38.5
A NA
47.4
50.1
35.3
NA
NA
19
44.7
47.8
41.6
NA
LHA
49.1
49.3
43.1 j
NA
NA
20
50.6
35.7
42.2
33.5
31.1
51.7
52.4
26.8
NA
29.5
21
60.2
47
43.7
49.3
' 47.9
51.4
46.4
47.7
49.7
49.4
22
59.3
49.3
50.2
48.6
46.7
56.1
55.3
38.4
33.2
NA
23
50.7
49
40.3
28.5
27.6
50
51.4
40
NA
41.3
24
61
49
49.2
52.1
1 48.3
52.1
51.7
48.3
51
48.1
25
45.1
36.3
NA
39.7
27.4
48.1
49.1
39.6
41.9
36.4
26
56.3
37.8
46.6
46.3
46
49.6
51.2
43.7
42.8
42.2
27
62.6
44.7
NA
53.1
48.3
4_7.5
46.7
50.1 '
51.7
48.4
28
61.1
51.7
32.9
52.8
49.2
49.1
41.1
f 48.3
49.649.7
Av. DNL
56.6 '.
47
45.5
47.8
44
50.9
51.4
d 43.4
44.7
42.8
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 0210112006-0212812006 -5-
Do
5-
Do
Community Vs. Aircraft Noise Levels
D N L d BA 02/01/2006-02/28/2006
RMT
Community DNL
Community DNL
Community DNL
*Aircraft DNL
30
02/01/03-02/28/03
57.2
02/01/04-02/28/04
56.1
02101/05-02/28/05
57.9
02/01/2006-02/28/2006
56.6
31
58
57.5
58.1
47
32
56.4
55.2
57
45.5
33
53.5
53.1
54.7
47.8
34
57.3
57
57,7
44
35
59.8
59.1
60.8
50.9
36
59.5
59.1
61.5
51.4
37
64.1
61.8
63.6
43.4
38
59.2
59.8
y� _59.3
44.7
39
60.3
61.4
60.3
42.8
Top 15 Runway 17 Departure Destination Report
Airport
City
Heading (deg.)
#O.ps l
Percent of Total Ops
PHX
PHOENIX
231'
47
3.8%
DFW
STL
DALLAS/ FORT WORTH
ST LOUIS
193'
160'
47
39
3.8%
3.2%
IAH
HOUSTON
185'
32
2.6%
LAS
LAS VEGAS
243'
30
2.4%
DEN
DENVER
237'
29
2.4%
ATL
ATLANTA
149'
29
2.4%
MCO
ORLANDO
151'
22
1.8%
MDW
CHICAGO (MIDWAY)
124'
22.
1.8%
MEM
MEMPHIS
162'
20
1.6%
IND
INDIANAPOLIS
134°
17
1.4%
MCI
KANSAS CITY
188'
15
1.2%
ORD
CHICAGO (O'HARE)
124'
15
1.2%
SAN
SAN DIEGO_
235'
13
1.1%
LNK
LINCOLN
208'
13
1.1%
Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 02/0112006-0212612006 -6-
. if I
6-
ifI
MEMORANDUM ITEM 3
TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC)
FROM: Chad E. Leqve, Manager — Aviation Noise &Satellite Programs
SUBJECT: EVALUATION / PRIORITIZATION OF PART 150 NOISE
COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES
DATE: March 1, 2006
One of the elements included in the 2006 NOC Work Plan is the evaluation, prioritization and
coordination of Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) noise mitigation and land use
measures. At the July 28, 2005 NOC meeting the Committee reviewed the land use measures
in the November 2004 Part 150 Update NCP focusing on preventative land use measures
reviewing community airport noise planning and related land use development practices. This
memorandum reviews/evaluates the Noise Abatement Measures included in the November
2004 Part 150 Update NCP detailing the status/priority of the respective measures.
By way of background, 14 C.F.R. Part 150 provides a framework for airport operators to develop
a comprehensive noise plan for an airport in the form of an NCP. A Part 150 NCP is comprised
of two fundamental approaches to addressing noise impacts around an airport, (1) Land Use
Measures, and (2) Noise Abatement Measures (operational measures to reduce noise).
A key component of Part 150 program planning is the development of a five-year forecast Noise
Exposure Map (NEM), commonly referred to as a noise contour. Noise contours outline the
areas eligible for Land Use Measures (compatible land use plans, property acquisition,
residential relocation and sound mitigation). In addition, Noise Abatement Measures (airport
use, aircraft operations and airspace usage amendments) can be pursued via a Part 150
program. The manner in which an airport is operated and aircraft procedures are executed have
a direct effect on the noise impact around an airport. As a result, operational procedures
contained in a Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) can have a direct effect on the shape and
size of the NEM
The 2004 Part 150 Update resulted in a comprehensive Noise Compatibility Program (NCP)
recommendation. In addition to several land use measures around MSP, the NCP includes
provisions for several operational Wise Abatement Measures.
The aircraft and airport operational noise abatement initiatives focus on:
♦ Aircraft Operation Procedures
♦ Runway Use
♦ Departure and Arrival Flight Tracks
♦ Voluntary Operational Agreements With the Airlines
♦ Provisions for Further Evaluation of Technology
As a result of the extensive analyses and review that was included in the 2004 MSP Part 150
Update, 17 Noise Abatement (NA) lVbasures are included in the Part 150 Update NCP. The
following information summarizes the noise mitigation measures including those that were
unchanged from the previous MSP Part 150 program, new measures and existing Part 150
measures that were modified slightly for inclusion in the update.
f as
NA -1. MSP Airport Noise Oversight Committee — This modified measure
recommends that MAC establish a successor organization for the now
defunct MASAC. The MSP Airport Noise Oversight Committee would
provide a balanced forum for interested parties to consider noise
mitigation initiatives in the context of benefit, feasibility, and fiscal
considerations.
NA -2. Noise Management Program - This modified measure would require
MAC to consider incentives and disincentives to reduce the impact of
aviation noise in the surrounds of MSP.
NA -3. Voluntary Nighttime Limits on Flights - This measure proved effective
to reduce nighttime flights of Stage 2 aircraft. This measure is modified
to reflect the revised MSP nighttime hours of 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.,
and to ask airlines to reduce the use of hushkit aircraft during the
nighttime.
NA -4. Nighttime Powerbacks - All airlines at MSP have agreed to eliminate
"powerbacks" during nighttime hours. All nighttime flights will "push
back" from the gate with an aircraft tug. (No change from the current
program)
NA -5. Engine Run -Up Field Rule - All airlines are required to conduct
maintenance run -ups at a designated run-up pad, and comply with the
MSP Run -Up Field Rule. (No change from the current program)
NA -6. Training Restriction - The major carriers at MSP have agreed not to
conduct training operations (e.g., touch-and-go operations) at MSP. (No
change from the current program)
NA -7. Operating Procedures - Airlines operating at MSP have agreed to
comply with airport operating procedures. This measure is modified to
reflect the use of the Distant Noise Abatement Departure Profile (NADP)
on all runway ends.
NA -8. Measures to Encourage Use of Manufactured. Stage 3 Aircraft - The
1993 Part 150 study established the Noise Surcharge/Differential
Landing Fee to recover some of the. costs of noise monitoring and
mitigation measures from the airlines. This modified measure would
require the MAC to develop and implement measures to encourage
aircraft operators to use manufactured Stage 3 aircraft.
NA -9. Runway Use System (RUS) - This measure prioritizes noise -sensitive
runway selection. This measure is modified to include Runway 17-35 in
the runway selection prioritization.
NA 10. Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS) -
ANOMS continues to be a vital tool for collecting operational data on
aircraft movements. (No change from the current program)
NA -1 1. Noise Abatement Sensitivity Training - MAC works with the airlines
and ATC to encourage awareness of noise issues and to help increase
compliance with current noise abatement procedures. (No change from
the current program)
IP6
NA -12. Low -Demand Flight Tracks — This measure would designate certain
flight tracks, by runway end, for preferred use during low -demand time
periods. (New Measure)
NA -13. Runway 17 Departure 2.5 Nautical Mile (NM) Turn Point Procedure -
This measure would reduce noise exposure for homes in the immediate
vicinity of the departure runway end by delaying westbound jet aircraft
turns until they are over the Minnesota River area. (New Measure)
NA -14. Runway 17 River Departure Procedure - This measure would
establish a published procedure to route departing jet aircraft over the
Minnesota River area when conditions allow. (New Measure)
NA -15. Runway 17 Departure River Heading Flight Track - This measure
would route departing jet aircraft over the Minnesota River area when
conditions allow. (New Measure)
NA 16. Runway 35 River Visual Approach Procedure - This measure would
recommend that MAC and the FAA investigate a visual arrival procedure
to Runway 35 that routes arriving aircraft over the Minnesota River, in
order to reduce noise exposure and overflights of areas north and south
of the river. (New Measure)
NA- 17. Future Technology and Global Positioning System (GPS) Initiatives
- This measure would recommend that MAC and the FAA investigate
the potential use of emerging GPS technologies for noise mitigation
purposes, and implement beneficial procedures as necessary. (New
Measure)
The development, modification and/or continuation of the various measures listed above are a
result of thorough review of both existing and new measures as part of the update process. The
following information provides additional analysis/explanation of measures that are new, and/or
were extensively reviewed as part of the update process.
Noise Abatement Departure Profiles
A Noise Abatement Departure Profile (NADP) is a complex set of procedures that a pilot follows
to control the way that an aircraft climbs away from an airport during takeoff. The procedures
deal with the pitch of the aircraft, as well as power and flap settings. In the early 1990s, the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) conducted several studies to develop standardized
departure profiles to minimize aircraft noise. The intention was to provide standardized
departure profiles for all airports around the country.
Prior to standardization, NADPs were developed on an airport -specific basis — resulting in a
variety of intricate profiles that posed a risk of compromising the pilot's attention to cockpit
details, traffic avoidance and other associated safety functions.
Under the FAA standardized rules, there are two departure profiles that airport operators can
implement to reduce aircraft noise around airports. Each procedure is outlined providing
acceptable criteria for speed, thrust settings and airplane configurations associated with two
NADPs (Close -In and Distant profiles). The Close4n Departure Profile is Intended to reduce
noise impacts for communities within approximately 3.5 miles (from the start of takeoff roll) of
the airport. The other NADP, the Distant Departure Profile, is intended to provide noise
reduction for all other noise sensitive areas beyond the 3.5 -mile area.
When an airport operator selects a departure profile, air carriers are required to implement the
selected NADP for use on the specified runways. In parallel runway situations, such is the case
at MSP, the same procedure must be used when departing in the same direction off the parallel
runways.
4y
Noise Abatement Departure Profile Recommendation:
One of the major aircraft operational procedures providing noise reduction as included in the
Part 150 Update (NA -7), is the implementation of the Distant Noise Abatement Departure Profile
for all runways at MSP.
The use of the Distant
" -�- Departure Profile off
"Ift Runway 17 is
consistent with the
procedures modeled in
_ � •�'� � � �, ��- the Environmental
i Impact Statement (EIS)
prepared for the
development of that
r>ab
runway. The resulting
change is over the
South Minneapolis
area where historically
the Close -In Departure
Profile was used on
Runways 30L and 30R.
Use of the Distant
v
.T=�NADP on all Runways
f r ` IF.- '' ` ' at MSP reduces the
population within the
Figure 1: Close -In vs. Distant NADP impacts within the 2007 Unmitigated Contour 2007 Unmitigated 60+
DNL by 7,707 people
and 3,343 dwellings as compared to the use of the Close -in NADP on all runways.
The decision to implement the Distant Departure Profile on all runways, through the Part 150
Update process, was a result of significant review and analysis by the Metropolitan Aircraft
Sound Abatement Council (MASAC), local governments, the Metropolitan Airports Commission
(MAC) and MAC's consultant, HNTB. Consistent with the authority granted to airport operators
as part of the FAA's NADP Advisory Circular (AC 91-53A) provisions, implementation of the
procedure was pursued by the NOC and the Distant NADP was implemented on all Runways at
MSP in July 2003.
Runway 17 Departure Flight Tracks
The introduction of Runway 17-35 in October 2005 changed the dynamics of the noise
environment around MSP. This is especially significant when generating noise contours and a
Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) as part of a Part 150 Update predicated on airport
operations in 2007.
As part of the review process for Runway 17-35 the Dual -Track FEIS and Record of Decision
(ROD) stated that noise abatement measures could evaluate departure tracks off Runway 17 in
an effort to avoid populated areas in close proximity to MSP, specifically in Bloomington.
Pursuant -to that initiative, MASAC investigated departure flight track options off Runway 17
through the Part 150 Update process.
The FEIS contained a series of proposed flight tracks off Runway 17 that included tracks "A"
through "G", which provided a 1900 heading fan from 950 clockwise to 2850. Using these tracks
as a starting. point, MASAC began an evaluation of possible flight track options off Runway 17.
Throughout the process consideration was given to procedures that provide sufficient guidance
to ensure that aircraft of varying performance capabilities could avoid, as much as possible,
populated areas while en route to their destinations.
&,S—
The goals relative to the Runway 17 departure flight track analysis were as follows:
♦ Reduce noise impacts within the 60+ DNL contour
♦ Avoid increased overflights of other communities
♦ Maintain runway capacity
♦ Ensure feasible implementation by FAA/Air Traffic Control
♦ Provide positive guidance to aircraft so they can reasonably follow desired flight
tracks
♦ Allow for possible future transition to Flight Management System (FMS)/Global
Positioning System (GPS) navigation
With the above goals as the comerstone of the evaluation efforts, several options were
discussed. The options included varying departure track fan concentrations ranging from a 600
fan (headings from 1400 to 2000) to a full 1900 fan (headings from 095° to 2850). These various
scenarios also included the proposed deletion of FEIS modeled tracks, in some cases, to
accommodate the various departure fan ranges. As a result of the extensive analyses
conducted by the MASAC Operations Committee and the Runway 17-35 City Group, a proposal
was developed that addressed the areas west and east of runway heading (1700) uniquely
relative to the existing land uses on either side of runway heading.
Runway 17 Departure Flight Track Recommendation:
After significant review, MASAC recommended that operations which have initial departure
headings east of runway heading (headings ranging from 950 to 1700) should initiate their turns
as soon as possible when departing Runway 17. This recommendation was made due to the
fact that there is no one flight path considered "better' than another when abparting to the
southeast over the existing residentially developed areas. This is consistent with the FEIS
documentation for Runway 17.
When conducting the same evaluation for departure headings west of runway centerline
(headings from 1700 to 2850) two main considerations arose: (1) Heavily residential developed
areas exist west of runway heading almost immediately off the runway end and (2) the
Minnesota River Valley south of the airport offers an area where departure operations could
overfly at higher altitudes in an effort to reduce residential overflight impacts close -in to the
airport.
As a result of the deliberations, a delayed turn point off runway heading (1700) for westbound jet
departures offered a solution that not only reduced the number of residents within the 2007 60
DNL Mitigated Contour but was also feasible for implementation according to the FAA's
airspace management criteria.
0
As a result of evaluations and comprehensive input from MASAC, the- MASAC Operations
Committee and the Runway 17-35 City Group, the recommended Runway 17 departure tracks
include departure turns
as soon as possible for
departures east of
_ Pmpo"d NAA3. Optwft 7-
1700 to 950 and a 2.5
Ru yj 17 2.5, KV Tam Paul!
nautical mile (from the
start of takeoff) tum
point, at which time jet
departure operations
would turn from
runway heading (170°)
K
to westbound
departure headings
.4
between 170° and
2850. The procedure
= z• -'-
results in a reduction
of 4,349 people and
1,926 dwellings within
the 60+ DNL contour
U
(the population change,
.
values are relative to
MFarrr il.\s t!t lrri IRI�r■ t .,.+ 1 a si. PC-�7
the 2007 Unmitigated
Contour). • Figure 2 Runway 17 departure tracks with a 2.5 nautical mile tum point
In an effort to ensure that the procedure was approved for implementation, in 2002 the MAC
initiated an Environmental Assessment (EA) of the procedure to gain FAA approval for
procedure implementation concurrently with the opening of Runway 17/35. After completion of
the EA, which included open houses and a public hearing on the proposed procedure, on
August 27, 2003 the FAA issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)/Record of Decision
(ROD) approving the procedure for implementation concurrent with the runway opening.
The Runway 17 2.5 Nautical Mile (NM) Departure Procedure was implemented on October 27,
2005, the day Runway 17/35 opened at MSP.
Runway Use System -
The implementation of a Runway'Use System (RUS) as a noise mitigation element at an airport
can provide additional noise reduction benefits as part of an airport's overall operational
philosophy. An effective RUS, when approached from the perspective of aircraft overflight noise
reduction, can solidify runway use selections that minimize residential overflights around an
airport while at the same time maximizing the use of existing compatible land uses. The
challenge of successful RUS implementation is striking a balance between runway use for the
purpose of maintaining safe and expedient operations into and out of an airport with minimizing
the noise impact on surrounding residential areas.
Through the process of reviewing possible noise mitigation measures contained in the Part 150
Update NCP, the MASAC Operations Committee reviewed the possibility of mplementing a
revised RUS. The evaluation encompassed several analyses. Implementation of a RUS is
predicated on several variables including the following:
♦ Weather and wind conditions
♦ Safety
♦ Capacity and flow requirements
47
♦ Traffic demand
♦ Aircraft separation
♦ Pilot compliance
♦ Air Traffic Control (ATC)
Through evaluation of these variables, several specific factors were discovered relative to
runway use at MSP. The selection of runways at MSP is determined primarily by wind and
driven by capacity requirements. This results in limited options to significantly change runway
use, especially during the daytime hours where capacity drives the runway use determinations.
Conversely, the nighttime hours provide a period where RUS implementation is a distinct
possibility.
To further quantify the times of available RUS utilization, HNTB conducted an analysis that
assessed daily operations at the airport based on an average annual week. The average annual
week was analyzed in 15 -minute segments to determine periods of low, medium and high
operational demand. It was determined that during times of high -demand (greater than 15
operations in a 15 -minute period)
runway use would be largely dictated
by the wind and capacity
requirements. During periods of
medium (between 3.5 and 15
operations in a 15 -minute period) and
low (3.5 or less operations in a 15 -
minute period) traffic demands, a
RUS for the express purpose of noise
reduction could be implemented to a
higher degree.
ProoOSed Runwav Use Svstem:
The MASAC Operations Committee
reviewed various RUS options for
implementation during low, medium
and high operational periods at MSP.
The result was the development of a
• Figure 3: MSP runway configuration and runway use terminology RUS that could be implementedduring the low and a portion of the
medium operational time periods at
MSP. It was assumed that tse of the capacity -driven RUS outlined in the Dual -Track Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) would be used during high -demand periods.
The RUS included in the Part 150 Update NCP is as follows:
Departures (In order of priority)
1. Runways 12L and 12R
2. Runway 17
3. Balanced use of Runway 4/22
4. Runways 30L and 30R
Arrivals (In order of priority)
1. Runways 30L and 30R
2. Runway 35
3. Balanced use of Runway 4/22
4. Runways 12L and 12R,
Departure preferences are separate and distinct from arrival preferences. Since departures are
noisier than arrivals, ATC first selects the departure runway and then selects the appropriate
arrival runway.
The preferences apply equally for daytime and nighttime operations. ATC may use head-to-
head operational procedures in the Corridor and on Runway 17-35, as needed.
By using the proposed preferred RUS departure runway priorities of 12's, 17, 22, 04 and 30's
and arrival runway priorities of 30's, 35, 04, 22 and 12's, the proposal results in a reduction of
1,406 people and 649 dwellings within the 60+ DNL contour (the population change values are
relative to the 2007 Unmitigated Contour).
The Runway 17 2.5 Nautical Mile (NM) Turn Point Departure Procedure EA included an
evaluation of the RUS as the assumed runway use with Runway 17/35 in operation. The EA
analysis concluded that there would be no significant adverse. noise impacts with the
implementation of the RUS. On August 27, 2003 the FAA issued a FONSI/ROD approving the
Runway 17 departure procedure with the RUS assumptions for implementation concurrent with
the runway opening.
River Departure and Arrival Flight Tracks
In an effort to further utilize the compatible land use that the Minnesota River Valley offers south
of MSP, consideration was given to specific procedures that would maximize the overflight of
the river valley for departures off Runway 17 and arrivals on Runway 35. Through significant
evaluation, and with input from the FAA, three options were developed.
Recommended River Departure and Arrival Flight Tracks:
As a result of the mentioned analysis, two Runway 17 river departure measures and one
Runway 35 river arrival measure were incorporated into the Part 150 Update. The three
procedures include a published river departure procedure, river heading departure flight track
and a visual river approach procedure.
Runway 17 - River Departure Procedure:
This procedure would be implemented via a published departure procedure for Runway 17. It is
intended to route Runway 17 departure operations over the Minnesota River Valley, avoiding
residential areas.
The procedure would direct aircraft to fly a straight-out heading of 1700 until reaching a turn
point located three nautical miles from the start of takeoff roll. At that point, the aircraft would
turn to a heading of 2450 to overfly the river. This procedure is intended for aircraft departing to
the south and west of the airport.
Because of the capacity impact this procedure poses during mid and high traffic demand time at
the airport; this procedure would most likely only be used during low -demand time periods. This
Would equate to typical procedural use between the hours of 12:15 a.m. and 5:30 a.m.
The Runway 17 2.5 Nautical Mile (NM) Turn Point Departure Procedure EA included the
evaluation of the Runway 17 River Departure Procedure in combined use with the 2.5 NM Turn
Point Procedure. On August 27, 2003 the FAA issued a FONSI/ROD approving the Runway 17
2.5 NM Tum Point Departure Procedure with the Runway 17 River Departure Procedure for
implementation concurrent with the runway opening.
n
Runway 17— Departure River Heading Flight Track:
This procedure designates the 2300 heading as a river heading, when used in conjunction with
the 2.5 nautical mile tum departure fan off Runway 17. The 2300 heading (Track L) routes
aircraft over the river valley.
Because this procedure is not a published procedure, and not part of a flight plan, the heading
can be assigned by the Air Traffic Control Tower as part of the takeoff clearance. This would
allow for the procedure to be used at any time when the FAA personnel in the Air Traffic Control
Tower can work it into the traffic flow. This procedure is intended for aircraft departing to the
south and west of the airport.
The Runway 17 2.5 Nautical Mile (NM) Turn Point Departure Procedure EA included the
evaluation of the Runway 17 River Heading Departure Flight Track in combined use with the 2.5
NM Tum Point Procedure. On August 27, 2003 the FAA issued a FONSI/ROD approving the
Runway 17 2.5 NM Turn Point Departure Procedure with the Runway 17 Departure River
Heading Flight Track for implementation concurrent with the runway opening.
Runway 35 — River Visual Approach Procedure:
This procedure considers a visual river approach to Runway 35 that routes arriving aircraft over
the river valley. The purpose of this procedure is to reduce aircraft arrival overflights of
residential areas.
Aircraft using this procedure would approach from the southwest, flying a 650 heading over the
river. As the aircraft nears the airport, it would turn on to final approach and align with Runway
35.
Several issues need to be resolved prior to implementation of this procedure, including airspace
design, Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) concurrence and flight testing. Also, additional
analysis would be required to determine if the procedure could be safely used at night.
Low -Demand Flight Tracks
In an effort to reduce noise impacts during low -demand periods the MASAC Operations
Committee endorsed preferred departure tracks for runways 30L, 121J12R, 04, 22 and 17. The
intent of this initiative was to determine flight track priorities and procedures for use by Air Traffic
Control (ATC), which would minimize the impacted population, for use during low -demand
periods.
Low -Demand Flight Track Recommendation:
In order to establish the best low -demand flight tracks for each runway, HNTB used DC9
hushkit, 90 dBA SEL contours to measure impact. The resultant proposal does not significantly
detour aircraft from their destination and is intended to give ATC guidance on selection of
appropriate flight tracks during low -demand periods producing the least amount of noise impact
on residents. This does not negate deviation from these tracks for the purposes of safety,. air-
craft performance, pilot compliance, weather and traffic conflicts. Below are the recommenda-
tions by runway.
Runway 04
♦ Heading 355 -degrees - Flight Track C. This heading directs aircraft over Fort
Snelling, the Mississippi River, and industrial land use that border the river. Precise
navigation of this route is not possible without external navigation to aid the pilot;
therefore, this measure recommends that MAC coordinate with the FAA to develop a
Departure Procedure (DP) that overflies the river basin, for use by non -heavy and
high performance aircraft. Until the DP is available, the 355 -degree true/353-degree
magnetic heading would be used.
I%1
Runway 22
♦ South DP. Also known as the "Cedar Avenue DP," this measure recommends
that MAC coordinate with the FAA to develop and implement a GPS/FMS DP
that routes departures from Runway 22 east of Cedar Avenue, then southwest
over the river. Although this DP has been examined in the past, GPS may allow
for its successful implementation. Additionally, since this DP is only intended for
use during low -demand periods, it would not affect runway capacity.
* West DP. This measure recommends that MAC coordinate with the FAA to
explore the potential for a GPS/FMS DP that overflies the 1-494 highway corridor.
This DP may not be feasible due to the close proximity of the highway to MSP
and the quick turn that would be required for aircraft to follow the DP.
Additionally, the potential for disproportionate noise impacts for homes near the 1-
494 highway corridor, as a result of concentrating flights over the highway, would
have to be considered prior to implementation.
Runway 12L,
♦ Heading 118 -degrees - Flight Track G. This flight track is currently used as a low -
demand flight track as part of the Crossing in the Corridor procedure. This measure
recommends the continued use of the Crossing in the Corridor procedure.
Runway12R
♦ Heading 105 -degrees - Flight Track B. , This flight track is currently used as a low -
demand flight track as part of the Crossing in the Corridor procedure. This measure
recommends the continued use of the Crossing in the Corridor procedure.
Runway 30L
♦ Due to the population density of communities off the departure end of Runway 30L,
preferred flight tracks do not provide a noise benefit with existing technology.
Designation of specific existing tracks for use during low -demand periods would
concentrate flights on selected tracks and disproportionately impact the same people.
However, future technology initiatives may allow for development of new routes.
♦ West DP. This measure recommends that MAC coordinate with the FAA to explore
the potential for a GPS/FMS DP that overflies the Trunk Highway 62 corridor. This DP
may not be feasible due to the close proximityof the highway to MSP and the quick
tum that would be required for aircraft to follow the DP. Additionally, the potential for
11
disproportionate noise impacts for homes near the TH 62 highway corridor would
have to be considered prior to implementation.
Runway 30R
♦ Due to the population density of communities off the departure end of Runway 30R,
preferred flight tracks do not provide a noise benefit. Designation of specific tracks for
use during low -demand periods would concentrate flights on select tracks and
disproportionately impact the same people.
Runway17
♦ Heading 095 -degrees — Flight Track A. Routes aircraft over primarily commercial,
industrial, and low density residential areas.
♦ Heading 960 -degrees — Flight Track B. Routes aircraft away from the straigWn
arrival flight track.
♦ Heading 185 -degrees — Flight Track D. Routes aircraft away from the straight -in
arrival flight track.
♦ Heading 230 -degrees — Flight Track L. Routes aircraft over the Minnesota River
area.
♦ River Published DP. Routes aircraft over the Minnesota River area.
Runway 35
♦ Due to the infrequent use of Runway 35 for departures, and the population density of
communities off the end of the Runway, preferred flight tracks do not provide a noise
benefit. Designation of specific tracks for use during low -demand periods would
concentrate flights on select tracks and disproportionately impact the same people.
Development of some of the above DPs will require the use of precision navigation technologies
such as FMS/GPS. In an effort to implement the above procedures, coordination with the FAA
will be paramount in determining the feasibility and implementation options with respect to the
proposed DP per runway. The evaluation of new navigation technologies was conducted as part
of a GPS Needs Assessment. The Assessment considered the integration of GPS -related
applications and technologies at MSP as an element of the Part 150 Update Noise Compatibility
Program (NCP) recommendations.
Provision for On -Going Evaluations of Global Positioning System (GPS) Technology
As part of the development of various mitigation measures for the Part 150 Update, MASAC and
the MASAC Operations Committee undertook an evaluation of GPS technology from the
perspective of noise reduction around MSP. The evaluation yielded findings that highlighted the
need for a national FAA policy relative to GPS technology in concert with national airport and
aircraft GPS augmentation in order to fully realize the benefits of GPS technology in helping to
enhance noise programs at the nation's airports.
GPS Evaluation Recommendation:
As a result of the evaluation, it was determined that GPS technology, although available, is not
currently at the point of offering immediate noise -reducing aircraft operational enhancements.
However, as the technology continues to become integrated into the National Airspace System,
future applications could. prove beneficial to enhancing aircraft operational noise reduction
initiatives at airports. Therefore, the exploration of GPS/FMS technology to evaluate existing
and proposed departure and arrival procedures as a future noise mitigation measure was
included as part of the Part 150 Update mitigation program.
Voluntary Nighttime Limits on Flights
Throughout the Part 150 Update process, the MAC and MAC's consultant (HNTB) worked
closely with airlines operating at MSP to compile accurate fleet mix information for the
development of the 2007 NEM. As part of this process, extensive evaluations were conducted
with regard to the reduction of nighttime operations at MSP.
Recommendation for the Voluntary Nighttime Limit on Flights:
Several options were evaluated from the perspective of all parties involved. The result of this
cooperative effort was approval of a recommended voluntary nighttime agreement with airlines
operating at MSP. The agreement would request that airlines operating at MSP limit the
operation of aircraft during the nighttime hours of 10:30 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.` Airlines would also
agree not to operate or schedule hushkit aircraft during the MSP nighttime hours (10:30 p.m. to
6 a.m.). Special exceptions would apply to operations that occur during the nighttime hours
because of emergencies, mechanical problems, Air. Traffic Control delays and weather.
Noise analysis showed that the replacement of MSP nighttime hushkit aircraft with
manufactured Stage 3 aircraft would reduce the population within the 60 DNL contour by 4,082
people and 1,867 dwellings, relative to the 2007 Unmitigated Contour.
Measures to Encourage Use of Manufactured Stage 3 Aircraft
Through the many analyses that were conducted throughout the Part 150 Update process,
substantial insight was gained relative to the causes of noise impact at MSP. As a result, it is
evident that the type of aircraft used at the airport is directly related to the amount of noise
energy produced.
Recommendation for Measures to Encourage Use of Manufactured Stade 3 Aircraft:
Realizing the effect aircraft type has on the noise exposure at MSP, the MASAC Operations
Committee and MASAC investigated measures to encourage the use of aircraft that produce
less noise and result in lower noise impact. on surrounding communities. The result is a .
measure that requires MAC. to develop and implement measures to encourage operators to use
manufactured -Stage 3 aircraft (quietest aircraft types among the Stage 3 fleet). The purpose of
this measure is to increase the use of manufactured Stage 3 aircraft at MSP. Successful
implementation of this measure will reduce the noise impacts associated with the operation of
the loudest aircraft at MSP.
Noise analysis showed that the replacement of all hushkit aircraft operations with manufactured
Stage 3 aircraft would reduce the population within the 60 DNL contour by 17,323 people and
7,379 dwellings, relative to the 2007 Unmitigated Contour.
Noise Management Program
Noise impact is not a one-dimensional issue; several variables can effect the amount of noise
impact communities receive from aircraft operations. In an effort to address all of the possible
noise impacts at MSP, the MASAC Operations Committee and MASAC reviewed options that
would help address the multiple causes of noise impact at MSP.
Noise Management Program Recommendation:
The result of MASAC's deliberations was the development of a measure outlining general
criteria for the establishment of a Noise Management Program. The measure requires MAC to
consider incentives and disincentives to reduce the impact of aviation noise in communities
surrounding MSP. The Noise Management Program would consist of voluntary incentives to
promote the reduction of noise impacts. These incentives and disincentives would be developed
after analysis of their potential benefit to the noise environment.
In considering the Noise Abatement Measures outlined in the 2004 Part 150 Update NCP it is
important to consider- the status of the respective measures and considerations for future
implementation. The following table provides the status of each measure, and in some cases
consideration for future implementation.
73
2004 MSP Part 150 NCP Noise Abatement Measures
Status and Considerations for Future Implementation
Proposed Measure
Measure Status
Consideration for Future
Implementation
1. MSP Airport Noise
Implemented
First meeting conducted in
Oversight Committee
June 2003. Continue NOC
operations.
2. Noise Management
Modification to Existing
Process will be initiated
Program
Measure Not Implemented
immediately following NCP
approval. Requires MAC
coordination with FAA, NOC,
and airlines to investigate
feasibility and
implementation of potential
measures.
3. Voluntary Nighttime
Modification to Existing
Process will be initiated
Limits on Flights
Measure Not Implemented
immediately following NCP
approval. Requires MAC
coordination with airlines to
implement voluntary
agreements.
4. Nighttime Powerbacks
Implemented
Continue existing measure.
5. Engine Run -Up Field
Implemented
Continue existing measure.
Rule
An updated MSP Run -Up
Filed Rule was approved by
the NOC in May 2005 and
implemented July 2005 at
MSP..The updated field rule
ensures continuation of this
measure after the integration
of Runway 17/35 at MSP.
6. Training Restriction
Implemented
Continue existing measure.
7. Operating Procedures
Implemented
Continue Eagan/Mendota
Heights Corridor Procedure;
Distant NADP
implementation completed in
July 2003.
8. Measures to Encourage
Modification to Existing
Process will be initiated
Use of Manufactured
Measure Not Implemented
immediately following NCP
Stage 3 Aircraft
approval. Requires MAC
coordination with airlines to
implement program.
9. Runway Use System
Implemented
Implemented concurrent with
(RUS)
opening of Runway 17/35.
Revised RUS was assumed
in the Runway 17 Departure
Procedure EA; FONSI/ROD
issued in August 2003.
10. Airport Noise and
Implemented
Continue existing measure.
Operations Monitoring
System (ANOMS)
11. Noise Abatement
Implemented
Continue existing measure.
Sensitivity Training
Program was enhanced by
the NOC in May 2005 with
7q
Proposed Measure
Measure Status
Consideration for Future
Implementation
the development and
implementation of the Pilot
Information Program.
12. Low -Demand Flight
Not Implemented
Process will be initiated
Tracks
immediately following NCP
approval. MAC would
request amendment of
ATCT standard operating
procedures to include
measure. FAA reviews,
approves, and implements.
This measure would require
significant FAA review and is
dependant on future
implementation of specific
aircraft navigation
technology fleet wide.
13. Runway 17 Departure
Implemented
EA prepared for flight
2.5 NM Tum Point
procedure; FONSI/ROD
Procedure
issued in August 2003.
Procedure was implemented
concurrent with opening of
Runway 17/35.
14. Runway 17 River
Implemented
EA prepared for flight
Departure Procedure
procedure; FONSI/ROD
issued in August 2003.
Procedure was implemented
concurrent with opening of
Runway 17/35.
15. Runway 17 Departure
Implemented
EA prepared for flight
River Heading Flight
procedure; FONSI/ROD
Track
issued in August 2003.
Procedure was implemented
concurrent with opening of
Runway 17/35.
16. Runway 35 River Visual
Not Implemented
Process will be initiated
Approach Procedure
immediately following NCP
approval. Requires MAC
coordination with FAA to
investigate feasibility and
implementation of the
measure.
17. Future Technology and.
Not Implemented
Process will be initiated
Global Positioning
immediately following NCP
System (GPS) Initiatives
approval. Requires MAC
coordination with FAA to
investigate feasibility and
implementation of potential
measures. This measure
would require significant
FAA review, a national FAA
implementation strategy and
is dependant on future
implementation of specific
Proposed Measure
Measure Status
1
Consideration for Future
� Implementation
aircraft navigation
technology fleet wide.
Considering the above information, 11 of the total 17 Noise Abatement Measures outlined in the
2004 MSP Part 150 Update NCP have been implemented and are ongoing. Of the remaining six
measures, three are modifications of existing NCP measures that were recommended in the
1993 Part 150 Update and three are new measures. The three new measures require significant
review and consideration by the FAA via the Part 150 review process underway and likely
subsequent environmental analysis consistent with the provisions of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA).
At the March 15, 2006 NOC meeting staff will provide a briefing to the Committee covering this
topic.
4
Pat Geagan
MAYOR
Peggy Carlson
Cyndee Fields
Mike Maguire
Meg Tilley
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Thomas Hedges
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
MUNICIPAL CENTER
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1810
651.675.5000 phone
651.675.5012 fax
651.454.8535 TDD
MAINTENANCE FACILITY
3501 Coachman Point
Eagan, MN 55122
651.675.5300 phone
-651.675.5360 tax
651.454.8535 TDD
rotmi
non
of EaEd
x G.
March 16, 2006or
Representative Tim Wilkin
551 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Dear Eagan Legislative Delegation:
As a community impacted by three runways at MSP International Airport, it is extremely
important that the City of Eagan be well represented on the Metropolitan Airport Commission
(MAC). In order to receive the representation the community deserves, the Eagan. City
Council, at the recommendation of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission, would like to get
your input and position on two proposed options for changes in how the City's representation
on the MAC is determined.
As you well know, with the opening of Runway 17/35 in October of 2005 and with the
existing operations off of the parallel runways over northeast Eagan, the entire City is now
impacted by airport noise to varying extents. Moreover, as the home to Northwest Airlines,
Mesaba, and numerous transportation companies that utilize MSP, the aviation industry and
the success of MSP is critical to our community. Given both the noise over the community and
the value placed on the aviation industry, the City of Eagan's representation on the MAC is of
utmost importance to our community.
Under current State law, the MAC Commissioners are appointed by the Governor, with the
exception of the Commissioners serving the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, who are
appointed by their communities' respective Mayors. The City of Eagan is currently represented
by BertMcKasy, whose district covers almost all of Dakota County, ranging from the City of
Eagan in the north to Sciota Township in the south (see attached map). It has been the City's
experience that the positions of our representative on the MAC oftentimes do not reflect the
positions of the City of Eagan, particularly as it relates to noise abatement and mitigation.
Furthermore, as an appointee by the Governor, our representative rarely, if ever, contacts the
City for input on any given decision being brought before the MAC.
Given the lack of representation that the City is currently receiving on the MAC, the City is
proposing one of two options for changes on the MAC, both of which would require
Legislative action. For this reason, the City is seeking your feedback on the proposed changes.
www.cityofeagan.com Ot}tion #1
Like the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, the City of Eagan is greatly impacted by MSP
Airport and would request a permanent seat on the MAC to be appointed by the Eagan City
Council.
THE LONE OAK TREE 0ytlOn #2
The symbol of In addition to Minneapolis and St Paul having their own seats on the MAC, there are also
strength and growth MAC Commissioners who represent greater Minnesota, including representatives from Duluth
in our community.
07
City of Eagan / MAC Representation
March 16, 2006
Page 2
and St. Cloud. It seems logical that if greater Minnesota and the core cities have representation
on the MAC, so too should the communities most impacted by the airport's operations.
There are four communities that encompass the 65 DNL noise contours that do not currently
have their own representation on the MAC Eagan, Bloomington, Richfield, and Mendota
Heights. It is suggested that at an -large seat either be reassigned to represent the cities in the 65
DNL contour or an at -large seat be added to the MAC in order to allow these four
communities, on a rotating basis, to have a single representative on the MAC.
Lastly, as a request for consideration, given the population shifts and impact of the airport on
certain communities, there is a definite need to adjust the current MAC districts. The City
understands that the districting for the MAC coincides with the Metropolitan Council districts;
however, impact of the airport, both positively and negatively, should be a consideration when
determining representation on the MAC. Clearly Eagan is impacted far greater and differently
by the operations at MSP than Sciota Township in southern Dakota County is, yet, our
communities have the same representation. The MAC districts need to better reflect population
concentrations and the impact of MSP, and thus redistricting should be strongly considered.
As representatives of the City of Eagan, you know how important it is that the City's interests
and positions be heard on the MAC so that the needs of the aviation industry are balanced with
the needs of our residents' quality of life. Therefore, if you could please share with the City
your feedback to the two options set forth in this letter, and/or any input you have pertaining to
our representation on the MAC, it would be greatly appreciated. Upon hearing from each of
you, the City will then determine whether to seek the introduction of legislation during this
session to address the issue of Eagan's representation on the MAC.
Thank you in advance for your consideration of the City's proposal. If you have any questions,
please feel free to call me or City Administrator Hedges at (651)675-5001. I look forward to
hearing from you very soon, and wish you the best as you begin this legislative session.
Sincerely,
J
r
Pat Gea an
g
Mayor
Attachment
cc: Eagan City Council
State Senator Metzen
State Senator McGinn
Representative Wardlow
Representative Hansen
Governor Tim Pawlenty
7(?
a ., ��. Commissioner District Map
Metropolitan Airports Commission
IM
Ca
H
h,e
St. "I
r . t' f I inwobd
BUHTS I Wp.
Chairwoman -Vicki Tidwell
Commissioners
(=30
District A -Tammy McGee
Minneapolis - Dardal Boirvin
(=:)
Dism B - Molly Sigel
SL Paul -Dick Long
(ZD
District C - Kad Berman
outstate,
CD�
District D- John Williams
Mira Landy. . Sent Tree Acres
C�
District E - Shany L. Stoneman
GTag W8FoeF - Rochester
District F - John Lanner.
Paul Rdftrm - marshal
District G - Tom Foley
Robed Mom Jr. -Duluth
District H - Ban McKazy
MAt Is TW.e-�.e MMM
IM
Ca
H
h,e
St. "I
r . t' f I inwobd
BUHTS I Wp.
'I- t
E a 5
A
bwi
wp.
Ma
I.-Funo Y
,Sl
T
IL f,
marshan Twp..
E Rav-nna I wp.
E eka
'-wp.. Doug! s Tw�qp.
r I
rk T
Greenvale
2006-2007 Goals/Work Plan—Eagan Airport Relations Commission ARC
Presented to City Council: March 14, 2006
Goal #1: Receive Better Representation on the MAC by Pursuing Legislation to Change
Eagan's Current Representation
o Preference: Eagan receives permanent representation on the MAC in the same way
Minneapolis and St. Paul currently have seats.
0 2nd Choice: Eagan joins with the other communities in the 65 DNL contour (who do not
currently have sole representation) to secure an at -large seat that would jointly represent the
cities of Eagan, Bloomington, Richfield, and Mendota Heights.
Work Plan to Achieve Goal:
• Send correspondence to Eagan Legislative delegation to outline the changes the City is looking for
with regard to MAC representation. Seek their opinions on the matter, and depending upon the
response, inquire as to whether one of Eagan's State representatives or senators will introduce a bill
to seek the change.
• In late 2006, when MAC reappointments are being considered, participate in local cable show to
discuss the issue of MAC representation and note Legislative support within Eagan.
Goal #2: Seek a New District H Representative on the MAC (in the event that the City is
not successful in securing a seat of its own or an at -large seat)
o Promote or recommend a resident or business person in the community who would represent
the interests of the City (e.g. noise concerns, promoting the transportation/aviation businesses
in the community, etc.) while also recognizing the political goals of the Governor (election in
November 2006).
Work Plan to Achieve Goal:
• Brainstorm list of possible replacements for Commissioner McKasy in early 2007.
• Determine whether Commissioner McKasy is seeking another term on the MAC.
Goal #3: Seek an Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Compliance Percentage of 95% or Greater
in 2006.
Work Plan to Achieve Goal:
• Monitor monthly Corridor deviation.
• Approach the FAA when compliance drops under 95% to request an explanation of the deviations.
• Maintain communications with the MAC and FAA so they are aware of the Commission's focus on
Corridor deviations.
Other ARC Proiects/Initiatives for 2006
Continue Communication Initiatives
o Experience Eagan updates on part 150, Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor, and Runway
17/35 operations
2006 ARC Goals/Work Plan
February 14, 2006 City Council Meeting
Page 2
o Cable television pieces as appropriate, including advertisement of MAC quarterly public
input meetings.
• 2008 Comprehensive Guide Plan Update—ARC to participate in updating of the Aviations Section
Noise Study Part H
o ARC to discuss whether'to conduct Phase II of the Wyle Noise Study in March
o Make recommendation to the City Council in April on whether to pursue Phase II of the
Study.
o If Council chooses to approve Phase II of the Noise Study, study should be conducted in
June, 2006 to be consistent with the study time period in 2005.
Property Value Study/Survey of Residents Moving Out of Eagan
o Approach the Southern Twin Cities Association of Realtors (STCAR) to see if they are
interested in doing a study on: 1.)How have home sale rates in areas most impacted by
the new runway been impacted (number of homes on market)?; 2.) How have homes
sold in these areas appreciated/depreciated in value since October 27, 2005?; and, 3.) Of
the residents moving out of Eagan, how much of a factor was airport noise in their
decision to move? ("exit survey")?
o If the STCAR is not interested in doing such a study, ask for their recommendation on a
college or university who may best be able to assist the City.
Runway Use
o Summer 2006: Review use on each of the runways to determine if runway usage
predictions in the 2007 proposed Part 150 Plan are accurate.
o Summer 2006: Review the use of the individual flight tracks off of Runway 17/35 to
determine if the usage matches with the data used to prepare the proposed 2007 Part 150
Plan.
o Continue to review the MAC's monthly technical advisory reports and Runway 17
departure reports.
• MAC Lawsuit
o Continue to monitor status of the City's lawsuit against the MAC regarding.the noise
mitigation program proposed in the 60-64 DNL contours.
• Homeowner Initiated Mitigation
o For those homeowners who wish to remodel or improve noise attenuation in their home,
the City should promote the materials prepared by the MAC in 2005, which contains
descriptions of products that are best for attenuating noise (e.g. window styles, doors,
insulation values, etc.)
d