Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
10/01/1985 - City Council Regular
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL OCTOBER 1, 9985 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Fire Department C. Park & Recreation Department B. Police Department f -Z D. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA '>. 3 Q A. Contractor Licenses P-S/D B. Police Department Mutual Aid Agreement with Metropolitan Airports Commission P go C. Approval of Election Judges for Municipal Election to be Held November 5, 1985 P . q2,. D. Approve Grading Permit #EX31-195, Whispering Woods 2nd (Hilla Construction) .q;i -E. Project 463, Authorize Feasibility Report, Cliff Road (East of T.H.3) Grading & Gravel Base ('.y3 F. Appointment of -Carolyn Braun to Airport Noise Committee G. Project 85-24, Award Bid for Paving Parking Lots at Rahn Park & P .q G. Ridgecliff Parks p-141 H. Correction of June 4, 1985, City Council minutes p.qq I. Amusement Devise License P y5 J. Project 428, Right of Entry Agreement, MWCC (Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer) f.qJ K. Project 464, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Wyndham Corporate Center - Sanitary Sewer) L. Approve Grading Permit #EX 23-215, Lexington Square 2nd Addition (Northland Mortgage) P-qcl M. Approve Grading Permit #EX 04-165, Oakwood Addition (Vince Kennedy) V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS p. 5j) A. Project 420, Final Assessment Hearing (Peaceful Heights - Streets & Utilities) p.5;L-B. Project 330, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington Avenue - Streets and Storm Sewer) P* 5f C. Project 306, Final Assessment Hearing (Diffley Road - Streets and Storm Sewer) P.S(o D. Project 456, Public Hearing (Eagandale Court & Area - Sanitary Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer and Street) p.74 E. Project 459, Public Hearing (Brittany 9th Addition - Sanitary Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer & Street) VI. OLD BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS p.9q A. Consideration of Position Paper for 24 -Hour Emergency Care Facility Q.9 R B. Resolution for Certification of Property Taxes Payable in 1986 1nl C. Consider Resolution to Set Public Hearing On Program Document P and Policy Statement For Dakota County Housing & Redevelopment Authority First -Time Homebuyer Program D. Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single -Family) & PF Public Facilty) and Preliminary Plat for Sunset 10th Addition (Randy Barrows) Consisting of 4 Single -Family Lots & 1 Church Lot, In NW 1/4 of Section 25, South of Diff ley Rd and West of Dodd Rd E. Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Pylon Sign for an Amoco Gas Station Robert Schlanagen) on Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Cliff 3rd Addition, NW 1/4 of Section 31 - Cliff & Slaters Roads P.0-1- F. Waiver of Plat for a Lot Split, Fred B. Wilson (Brad Swenson) of 4.4 Acres Located East of T.H. 13 and South of Intersection of Blue Cross and Blackhawk Roads 1.130 G. Preliminary Plat for Norwest 2nd Addition (Lee Tollefson, Bill MacPherson & Milo Pinkerson) for 2 Lots on Approximately 3.8 Acres Located in SW 1/4 of Section 10 (Pilot Knob & Yankee Doodle Roads) pjg4 H. Special Permit for Lundgren Brothers Construction for a i Direction Sign Located in the NE 1/4, Section 16, SE of the Intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Federal Drive VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS A. Implementation of Federal Labor Standards Act Requirements p•/Sl B. Proposed Changes to License and Fee Schedules I%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD•(for those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1985 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval of the September 17, 1985, regular City Council minutes, special minutes for the September 10 and September 24, 1985, special City Council meetings and the September 17, 1985, HRA meeting, and the agenda for the October 1, 1985, City Council meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: A. Fire Department There are no items to be considered under Fire Department at this time. B. Police Department There are no items to be considered under Police Department at this time. C. Parks & Recreation Department There are no items to be crnsidered under Parks & Recreation Depart- ment at this time. D. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT There are 6 items to be considered under Public Works Department at this time. Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Two D. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Speed Limit Petition - Diffley Road at Northview Elementary School --Enclosed on pages through �(e is a copy of the petition that the staff received requesting the installation of a "school speed zone" on County Road 30 adjacent to Northview Elementary School. Enclosed on page 7 is a letter of response from the Public Works Director informing the petition's initiator of the pending Council action and the jurisdiction associated with this request. Recent contact with the County Traffic Engineer revealed their reluctance to recommend favorable action on this request by their County Board. The reasons are listed as follows: 1. All loading/unloading of school buses is conducted well off the roadway in a protected parking lot area adjacent to the school. 2. The activity/playground area is separated from the County roadway by a rural ditch section which provides a physical buffer. 3. The present stop signs on County Road 30 at Lexington Avenue help to minimize the traffic speeds and provides a break in the traffic flow for turning vehicles into the parking lot. 4. There has not been any record of accidents in this vicinity associated to speed or turning movements into the elemen- tary school area. 5. The City or the County has not received any complaints from the Transportation Department of School District #196 pertaining to problems associated with ingress/egress to Northview Elementary School from County Road 30. Enclosed on page is a section from the State Traffic Regulation Act pertaining to speed zoning and school areas for the Council's information. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition requesting a school zone speed limit on County Road 30 near North - view Elementary School and to approve/deny the preparation of a resolution requesting Dakota County Highway Department to imple- ment the petition's request. 0 6 4 PETITION STOP SIGN I/we, the undersigned hereby petition the City Council of the City ofto --install-stc&—sagns on }gan nt vsv a:cax A PG,-IOOL I/we, request this installation for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. 4. I/Em request that the City Council take this petition request under consideration at its earliest opportunity and that we be informed as to when it is scheduled so that we may appear in person if we so choose. NW.E (Please print and initial) ADDS 2. 3. ' 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. PETITION TO: Eagan City Council ri'O: !: Concerned Citizens Sept. 10, 1985 We, the undersigned parents, teachers and friends of Northview Elementry School, motivated by concern for the safety of our children, do hereby petition the city of Eagan to establish a school speed zone on County Road 30 to comply with state statute 169.14 sub -part 5-A, page 27. This statute allows each municipality to locally estab- lish speed zones for it's own schools such that when child- ren are present speed limits will be reduced to a safe level. Such zones will be clearly marked with signs and patrolled by traffic enforcement personnel. r;tpresent the speed limit on County Road 30 (Diffley Rd.), which pLisses within 30 yards of Northview Elementry is 50 mr_h! We consider this speed excessive and unsafe for the high volume of auto and slow accelerating buses turning into traffic. .,; busy school playground also adjoins County Road 30 which is active during and after school hours an:? often on weekends. Please reduce this limit to a safe level as a demon- stration that the Eagan City Council is concerned and recog- nizes its responsibility for school safety to the citizens of our co:;.munity. . . You could be saving your child's life. �3 lYl�a r � Thank you, F OIL -1 r -d S-1- AIA /a/ V id. / `/CZ U — //D _ t�C�6 / �)c - C4� a` 4 . G; 3 ` & e4) •v 13 0 9- NAYNj r, Faoa, *9a -a731 qsa-G-73 � 451-6-J-lZ iL L �s 5957 Ll y ?l E. �� o A) �.s4( - .3 6 33 y5L-'L611 4151-�-6c-;-G 7 -3 1 k4k QL r L VC) 1111(F " a-• o 3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH S EP T JERRY THOMAS August 23, 1985 THEODORE WACHTER • Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE MR. AND • MRS. RON POTTER City. Clerk 1656 SHERWOOD WAY EAGAN MN 55122 RE: School Zone Speed Limit Petition - Diffle_y Road at Northview Elementary School Dear Mr. & Mrs. Potter: On September 18, 1985, your petition to establish a school speed zone on Diffley Road (County Road 30) was forwarded to my attention by our City Administrator, Thomas L. Hedges, for processing through the City Council_. This letter is to inform you that this petition will be presented to the Council at their regular meeting on Tuesday, October 1, 1985, between 6:30 - 7:00 p.m. for their consideration and action. If the Council approves your petition, they will forward a formal Resolution request to Dakota County due to the fact that this road is under the jurisdiction of the County Highway Department. This Resolution must then be presented to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners for further action, which could entail either an establishment of a school zone speed limit or forwarding a request to the Minnesota Department of Transportation for a formal speed study review and recommendation for the establishment of a proper speed limit along this segment of County road. Your interest and concern in initiating this public input is appreciated and commendable and is often times a significant factor in receiving positive responses from the various governmental agencies. If you would like to discuss the issue in further detail or would like additional information pertaining to the process, please feel free to contact me for further clarification. Sincere , Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC:jbd cc: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY ywin 'tiE �y-0m>.Cuim�WLL. EdVC0o W .- -b E�C O .a�OW W 0 F,,O y02 y Gn m7m t1ay OOO K0.mq �CFb�`•yp.%C C W Wp.ua Wu ,°3W� m W W a C.E J C: d0 E W'W 0..� E. O'y V m L° W 6i L> w L ►. C a. q 00 •p J S. °V3C�q.aqf' . � °yrCmcvC=yau7WLL. s�yJ'aWEom . y .LWtVXWyO+CCW+L,,,:Jat•�:aE`qqm>au°aEC >T�^W0.sC03aW 7 wuoVO�>tC©E '..`WCn_mccFJ .. W,gVm�GOU�, a°UC3WW' '-cOcW .C.y�W >ymALirnsvmuao .Op.LroyoC'O L°WC7 J'_EyWO1 "WOoW�O.Qma� .+°,_arTmEO..CaEJiLO�y>Ev>��a.�a� W>ma'EL�,OCpL�-Oy?wLEs3� •°":iW, "EEa'q�►� Q �ammm W'8E.dOm�WWv,[W.>E03 cel m nT8 W C W C°UW1 uCs W�' 5�U W;: y ,.cm� � OW O >, w "* EL u ca Wvm LV as wL - N OWs°y 0 W C cd .aW�wWwO •b °Uabw O mC U V O> d 0.VOU.Jb�:aba cs uraL J pO S m 5 W c: �LM.=r. m . �WO0 3 j "�o7 C7 '-'FCcbm, tTO� O y0E>X m gaW rn'V =.t.ymd'QCaWGmtm.��L 0 mya'Lq ,� '° ec m� :n .. a o > C*_ Ce 0Ca L c 0cc 0a o o L W �d .0 L S W a.: ,.= *c L Crn u n° m _ 3 nW>u t- -0 &- W Ooa.?dv= 7 L cis :s W "- J cn� C ca .< Ci > O W uo m W ?fwUy�° O .lN °Wm C6 EWWu m C m -lj C .+�3uC`aaaE �O60pm�E WA iyerSCm.0 O W O XJ0.W J r_ � O,Tp too Oqs-c7_''.0 ca =.a to0 C W :0 0 C. CO WmV7 CL W m.a m 0 W ouwu +a a N a E;muWY � '$ °,v;dWWZ�W•EW0,wG.-m6E. WVx .d�rE,E �V . 9 Ws � a -C bo D� i H'L7 W> ECL>>m W E G/:�0�� E"• W L g W m•w—w Wb� L O 0� a J W 'b ai c ys W 0�.: W m j S +� ... O O ,t• W C U tD L O L W WO u W +� C L c7 0 p U >,r L C m .a .G W 0,;: W �.' 'fl ° L y 3 C 0 O "t- cq m q ho >03 . L V .� d" O LO C p °•E W 3 4' W O.'0�.° O 3 3 b >+m aai ca W C°i Jw0 OC °'O e;° � n � � C TI v � co 0 04 •>1 1 O WC O CTCi ./0C1V0 O v>CmqJ=a yLd q .9 C* m a Lr%O�L O �]pq a O U7�L ", o cj a�s CWCm VEWr. ��S WLx � W b 03 m WEa. W W W m0.93 V V r=4.N CA J•U m 3 "0) m Z,czE L=c: E J �TJ'E L C J ... O ba O W W ca c M -C EvVi G p 4 O 'v t> ' E .Wa 'C u W � 93 J L�� w L G ►U. � C O � ,pLo'u aCi�''E u cmy> v L� uW •y L m V u >, CLQ roe aai L W V =' a�.L3 _X 1. poc E C.OJ� W m C C.� v O•p_C W O ba L V L J OJ- W C3. 0 U ui ° C C S C W C u C g m W 3> >> 0 m=E' � m-oo� ti•a� E c_cmEL.m oa�a� °ate L q C^ V u J a> J •C ^� W �' 'C7 m C � O ap CL Ga'�a O WF.r.O LgEu� LO OCL• >'s E� 71 ='va c3 c3c ei. C3 O C E• cC 0.J y� L .,..G • m �D U1 � O � to 7 m W W W -0 c: v: > > OL W m C V LO Q,3 c mo E.; 7 0 i aaim� �a o >3=J .y ' ` •�J i 1.>. J saq m3,aE a c as um E�aW m a Jr 'J °• cs W'E.�L L•� vUiw C O L d V ':: O• C W V •J•+ L W W 3W y Z w Om V V W C m m 'U •0.> G 43 V W W S s C - .°• c = V1 O O .7 u cc W a�0 In O O O u Ecb °Um � u o•�Eol� E:.o W .a _. Cs a� aj W=t -'EC W EWA > a c -U V 00 G W .0 �'• .E .Wi p Wo.�c > >'03 m u L ..J. L > C O q W N C V V W' a cs ,u W CLW .a as ;EsW�vf > 0-4 ° O cd ami E V V W1-0 •`0�3� W •O •C O p � 03 L. a o tOC3.o>> 3 05 :2 °4)U�o > W W Ob '•" 'O C d W W +a m +a L m W W W '•' u7 +a " •� � v a C J U� � vi C W J '• ';q E m aW. w C �, .O L C U.- +� O -W+ W G C3 W.Wa W ° W A .E> L aL• 0 C m= Ow X I �, C 0 0 E.,, O. O W m W �+V Z3 I f CL L L .— ° C I tea, 3 c'3 r 0.0 J o.o:oma'- o>.&- o L W W W •y -i >> .3 0 ' C LL ym 6..'.a y f6 W H W '-�'b y c 41 W C y L 3 U Q J W as •fl 7 W g N a C y ' 0 m c W •W ° U'U ° Co W OWl � LL G v tl rnv.• >>^' V ' '% v � aha d •b •'. C _ ca u E6u-. Ca C3 W q p'0°rf v M TJC .a03 L? w A 0 W M Q•p s m?W E Om W.0 a 93 as .�a m C COW I.. 'd .G m m M W 4w �"'a'....= y� amid J U- O G O a m 't u •-• u > 4-1 E J 3 fq CO a 93 >s'C ppm W E'0 W 'in 3 fy/) J c coLW,OWa0-, W W TJ J m m m T7 O C7. E m Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Three BOULEVARD OBSTRUCTION ORDINANCE/VARIANCE REQUEST 2. Boulevard Obstruction Ordinance/Variance Request (Tiffany Point and Tiffany Circle North) --Enclosed on pages /0 and is a copy of a standard form letter that is sent out by the Street Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department to all property owners who have been identified as having "physical" obstructions located within public right-of-way which could be a hazard to the snow removal operations. Enclosed on page is a letter from two property owners who want to pursue a variance request before the City Council pertaining to their "removable" basketball standard that was identified as being in violation of the current City ordinances. Enclosed on page 1-3 is a copy of a letter sent to these two homeowners informing them of the Council's anticipated review of their variance request at the October lst Council meeting. As the City continues to grow and develop, staff has been finding more and more installations of this similar situation. While our first concern is the removal of any obstruction that would create problems or hazards for our smow removal operations, the other issue is the hazards and liability of formally approving a recreational activity within the designated street right-of-way. As the Council may recall, 'the issue of allowing recreational activities for basketball standards on a designated street was originally discussed in the fall of 1980 when the first basketball standard was identified as being constructed on Merganser Court in Duckwood Estates. As a result of that in-depth discussion, the Council determined that it would not be in the City's best interests to identify and approve the permanent installation of basketball standards that require the use of public streets because of the liability and safety issue. Therefore, staff is strongly recommending that the Council continue to maintain their past policy of not allowing variances to this ordinance and to require property owners to remove these basketball standards as they are identified and noticed by staff. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To deny the request for a waiver from present City ordinances allowing the use of public streets and rights-of-way for recreational facilities through the installation of basketball standards. t +c citV of cagan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 "or PHONE: (612) 454-8100 DATE: August 1, 1985 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS ADDRESS: 1134 Tiffany Point THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L 13 Blk 2 City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Canterbury Forest City Cierk Dear Eagan'Resident : RE: RIGHT-OF-WAY/BOULEVARDS - CITY PROPERTY It has been brought to the attention of the Public Works Department that you have placed a structure or obstruction on the City right- of-way in violation of the City Ordinance referenced below. CITY ORDINANCE SEC_ 10_32. OBSTRUCTIONS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY Subd. 1. Obstructions. It is unlawful for any person to place, deposit, display or offer for sale, any fence, goods or other obstructions upon, over, across or under any public property without first having obtained a written permit from the Council, and then only in compliance in all respects with the terms and conditions of such permit, and taking precautionary measures for the protection of the public. An electrical co=d or device of any kind is hereby included, but not by way of limitation, within the definition of an obstruction. Subd. 6. Continuing Voilation. 'Each day that any person con- tinues in violation of this section shall be a separate offense and punishable as such. SEC. 11.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Subd. 9. Structures in Public Right -of -Way. No buildings, structures or uses may be located in or on any public lands or Right -of -Way without approval by the Council. The public right-of-way or boulevard is that area from the curb to your property line (approximately 13 feet) and is intended solely for utilities and snow storage. The structure must be removed from this boulevard area to provide for required storage and also to protect our snow removal equipment from damage. We apologize for /19 THE LONE OAK TREE...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY r RIGHT-OF-WAY/BOULEVARDS - CITY PROPERTY PAGE 2. the inconvenience this relocation may create, but it is necessary to prevent damage to your structure and also to our snow removal equipment. The only exception to the ordinances are mail boxes if they are installed according to Federal specifications as furnished by the post office. A copy of this letter notifying you of this violation will be placed in your parcel file with a copy to the appropriate enforcement division. THEREFORE, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED TO HAVE THE VIOLATION CORRECTED AND THE OBSTRUCTION REMOVED WITHIN 60DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS LETTER. After that time, -you will be subject to the fines as stipulated in this ordinance. The City of Eagan cannot accept any responsibility for damage that may occur to those obstructions that are in violation of the City Ordinance. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 454-5220. Yours truly, William H. Branch, Superintendent Public Works Department WHB:jbd it i St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company 385 Washington Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Telephone (612) 221 7911 9 O's IE Rul PropertyMiablhly Insurance September 9, 1985 Mr. Thomas Hedge:, City of Eagan City Administrator 330 Pilot Knob Road P.0_ Box 1191) Eagan, MN 55121 Re: City Ordinance Sections 10.32 and 11.1 — Right of Way Dear Tom: As recently discussed, Jan Somsen and I each received the attached notice relating to a violation of city ordinance. Although the notice is not specific, Moth Jan and I have basketball goals facing our culdisacs and therefore, assume this is the problem - Both goal_: are us.t off the curb, but have been erected in such a fashion as to allow for their- removal during the winter months with nothing protruding above ground level during that time. With such an arrangement, neither- goal interfere_, with the snow removal process, nor- will they interfere with any other city equipment, i.e. street streetsweeper. They are therefore, not disruptive to city ope=rations and provide much personal satisfaction to all residence of the respective culdisacs during the summer months- In onths- In light of the special arrangements Jan and I have made, we are requesting specific permission to leave our basketball goals where they are. Tom, we appreciate you looking into this for us. Let me know if you need anything further. Sincerely, f� Richard G . Pf fer 1134 Tiffa�t�yjint Attachment 0an D. Somsen 1147 Tiffany Cir. North Property and Liability Affiliates of The St. Paul Companies Inc.: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company I St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company The St. Paul Insurance Company I St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company i The St. Paul Insurance Company of Illinois ,y 00)__ 2oFeagan 3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 August 23, 1985 ft RICHARD G PFEIFFER 1134 TIFFANY POINT" EAGAN MN 55123 JAN D SOMSEN 1147 TIFFANY CIRCLE N EAGAN MN 55123 Re: Boulevard Obstruction Ordinance - Variance Reauest Dear Richard & Jan: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Your letter of September 9, 1985, to Thomas L. Hedges, City Adminis- trator, requesting a variance to the City's boulevard obstruction ordinance,was forwarded to my attention for review and processing. This letter is to inform you that your request for a variance will be presented to the Council at their regular meeting on Tuesday, October 1, 1985 between 6:30 - 7:00 p.m. A copy of the background information and Staff's recommendation will be forwarded to your attention no later than Monday, September 30th. This letter is to inform you of the schedule for the Council's review of your request and to ask you to comply with the current ordinance until such time that a variance has been granted to avoid any possible citations that may be issued in the interim. If you have any questions or concerns that you would like to discuss in further detail prior to the Council meeting, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincere , 4 homas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC:jbd THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Four NO PARKING SIGN REQUEST - GOLD TRAIL 3. No Pa k* Sign Request - Gold Trail (Leslie Moss) --Enclosed on pages /J through is a copy of the letter that staff received requesting the installation of restrictive parking signs along the south and west side of Gold Trail in front of the existing duplex and multiple dwelling units across from Woodhaven Park. Enclosed on page 12 a response from the Public Works Director informing them of the staff's investigation nd recommendation for Council consideration. Enclosed on pageis a map showing the various types of restrictive signs and their recommended locations as a result of the Engineering Division's study of this request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge the request and approve/deny the installation of restrictive parking signs on Gold Trail adjacent to Woodhaven Park. ' _ � -_ - ^ -�7 ' t RC2/'/ • � � • �V cn- �y�'�� (C� �G`✓/ -- •t.,.y 4 •� / / -T ✓..GSC/ - _ 21 _ _}t - - ,��..`_•=U2�' - _L- -�? mac. ; :..:w ��1.:r'.�• �„�.:i �>�%�.� ��?.� � � c� ,»" - a "� � v �jf���i�i`�'L/ _���--'t-G/' r�••n-fes/ �.;�1 i..�> i( !.� _ ►s 4 j . �. a 4-� �� ��i�. G � �f. ,.L�• �i-r ,,�% r �i �f a Lv- t y.x r F} �,.,.,�' �` `}Sh,w �✓' 'c � r '(��-L.�'/ � G�� �Gc%Yt:•Gr��' L� ��T�) 'r"�-�CF�•G=�-c.;� . y "`; t,ft- � -i'�,� •"� � (� �/f'�A �..• i/��•f/%/� ,�V Cly-cam/�� / -YL+r .i�, >< „�a..3 f3 �yi>�� r �72�e �v2. �G�1�L � �� 1�'• Gr'�' j/'t��%"�C+t�.I ,lii c..c�c-+Id �/����� �^'�..+ s s J - •::x� t .n � «'yt•+.4ysaS. �S� 4 �f..�fetcr, _ V y . aj _ }� r '� Z: ( t /.Q-� `GSC C%G!/� f� /�✓ 7Z/'� " :. ''.-may.-. -r r � 2 y f _"� l- �„�-•���` //�j� lie 17, •-�, i .� 1'� } -�,�r . �i y �� ti � < Cjj�c.�'-' /� ��/t/� � ��C /✓ "� � LS /G ��-G�-%t•1ci /�"� /// -�..��, .�.� s �� t� �='� �'� ,:='• ,.a�-t.� 4' n r, � %ZEAL -c !✓ � c�/�L=�7�•l �i/LC•� � �'C� L �.._� - _•' � '�� t`. ; i ���e'Err �/�'L(i �� ��� r��Ie..iL-r[� /IL��?L�%G!/f .�/�C/Ji� _?T:..•N-.hry...:'t-"''Y.;taN:pe_';;��'.=A''�-�-. !` _ '� K^G'C�t'Kilr..i / �(��vK '.�"'.cifrG:�, �' vi"c3'•'�s,t-�`''�`3' ��,e�'eR��s%1{i�,S-•� /�1�/q/ � �.C./2%`�G/ , � /� / <<<.-'.1y�e.�, �`A%L�C/[/ / .% e� �!' /� 6 f &7 7 3140 Vp 9 I S-3 7,3"4, 3795 PILOT KNOB- ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 est 23, 1985 SEP -- MR & MRS LESLIE MOSS 3876 CALCITE DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 Re: No Parking Sian Petition - Gold Trail Dear Mr & Mrs Moss: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk In response to your letter, directed to the Mayor, the City Adminis- trator asked the public works department to conduct an investigation pertaining to the need and proper location for designated res- trictive parking signs along Gold Trail adjacent to the properties you referenced in your letter. Please be informed that the staff will be forwarding its recommenda- tion to the City Council for consideration at their regular meeting on Tuesday, October 1, 1985, between 6:30 and 7:00 p.m. A copy of the information being forwarded to the Council will also be sent to your attention no later than Monday, September 30, 1985. If you would like to discuss any aspect of this petition in further detail, please contact Rich Hefti, Assistant City Engineer, who is instrumental in conducting the survey and preparing the recommend- ation for Council consideration. Sincerely, Vomi��asA. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jbd CC: Rich Hefti, Assistant City Engineer THE LONE OAK TREE. .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY AR E LL' S' <ADDIT�IO-N 1A a `7!'4 � try -9''y_• �- ![• .ln�i laoro nn• \\\F w�•] c]CC •C CONDOMINIUM NO. 48 A. 0.�=� COUNTRYSIDE CONDOMINIUM i -- Br Ijj O - ' Eagan CIO a `t j'1� .e, e. � ion:, • ro-.. � •. `�'1• � y .�. 4 POM.^, ,. IY Ii, S j fft/�/L�� :. 12 cr City of Eagan �;� s� '. • ] z to 021-00 ! .•,,;Z. s tit '•>.' `�^� GONG T R A i'- -• ,:.i--�'� 1 i -4- 2 ;.` ,✓ • �` B lam•/• •. \i14 t ,-� City of Eagan �. �!� ,�\ 060 -OC •IS 5l9=]�•. I BGI N NO PARKING I 1 12 AM TO 8 AM� m r NO PARKING 12 AM T08AM� C r END NO PARKING 12 AM TO B AM City of ' Eagan RECOMMENDED SIGN PLACEMENT FIRE Ir STAT 1 O N N 0. I i `` ./ = e; .. � � s le 117 14 T �Ile,••", �t ' � r B I � �/ y :� '� ♦ / v ��s /rte : `. . . Agenda Information Memo October 1,_1985, City Council Meeting Page Five STOP SIGN PETITION - SPEED STUDY/TRAFFIC COUNT 4. Stop Sign Petition - Speed Study/Traffic Count Results (Bear Path Trail & Suncliff Drive) --At the August 6th Council meeting, the Council received a petition requesting the installation of a three-way stop sign at the above -referenced intersection and continued consideration of this request to a later date to allow the Engineering Division and Police Department to conduct the appropriate traffic and speed studies respectively. Enclosed on page 70-4-2-1 is a letter sent to Gloria Jahnke informing her of the results of the studies conducted and the forthcoming Council's reconsideration of the original request. Enclosed on pages 7,2-- through 2-5' is the petition,map and letter stating the staff's recommendation for denial of the stop sign installation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the installa- tion of a three-way stop sign at the intersection of Bear Path Trail and Suncliff Road. 3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 September 23, 1985 GLORIA JAfNKE 4300 SUN CLIFF ROAD EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Stogy Sian Petition - Traffic Count Results Dear Ms. Jahnke: Council Review of Saeed Stud BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE City Clerk and As you recall, on August 6, 1985, the City Council considered your petition requesting the installation of a stop sign at the intersection of Sun Cliff Road and Bear Path Trail. As a result of that consideration the Council deferred consideration of your request until the Engineering and Police Departments could complete traffic count and speed studies through this area. This is due to the fact that the reasons for the petitioned stop sign were based on the increasing number of vehicles and their speed through this intersection. Both studies have now been completed and the information is being presented to the Council again for their review and consideration at their regular meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 1, 1985 between 6:30 - 7:00 p.m. The speed enforcement was conducted between August 8th and August 21st on four separate days by an unmarked vehicle using a "radar surveillance gun". They included the morning rush hour, several __mid-day checks and the evening rush hour time periods. A total of 66 vehicles were clocked with thirteen vehicles exceeding the 30 m.p.h. speed limit, The fastest vehicle was registered at 36 m.p.h. with the other twelve being 31 - 35 m.p.h. These results do not indicate a significant speeding problem requiring the placement of stop signs. From Monday August 12th to Friday August 16th, a continuous traffic count was conducted on both Bear Path Drive and Sun Cliff Road at this intersection. The results of this traffic count indicate that there was an"average" of 625 vehicles per day on Bear Path Trail and 316 vehicles per day on Sun Cliff Road. According THE LONE OAK TREE. ..THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY GLORIA JAHNKE STOP SIGN PETITION SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 PAGE TWO - to the City of Eagan's engineering standards and the manual on Traffic Control Devices, these traffic volumes do not warrant the installation of a three way stop sign at this intersection. They do warrant the installation of a stop sign on Sun Cliff Road but past City practices have been the installation of a yield sign at "T" intersections such as Sun Cliff Road and Bear Path Road. As I indicated previously, this information will be considered by the• Council on October 1st with the Staff recommendation that stop signs -not be installed until one of the following four condi- tions occur: 1. An increase of traffic volumes through this intersection. 2. Meadowland Park is developed and the pedestrian access at this intersection is upgraded. 3. Documentation of excessive speeds that cannot be controlled through periodic enforcement. 4. Documentation of five or more reported accidents of a type susceptible to correction by a multi -way stop sign installation during a twelve month period. If you would like to discuss this in further detail prior to the to contact me at your convenience. Sincerer Ax-"� Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC:jbd V/ information or additional concerns Council meeting, please feel free .a1 If d L6 PETITION 3L STCP SIM I/we, the undersigned h petition. ;I -e- hereby peti City Councilf install stop sir, --s on o 11ie at the inter -sec -td- -i VV I/we, request this- installati on for the follcwing reasons: 2- tj 3. Cityfof Eagan to f /� "7 , *� 4) I/Awe t that the Citv Cc'; Moil take this petition request under consideration at its earliest cppertunity and that we be info=ped as to when it is scheduled so that we may appear in person if we so choose. WE (Please mrin4C and initial) ADDRESS 0 Zhol-T -Tel /I H -S Cp lee i -i e e n a.,, i. Clue/( 5,e6u,'1z1 . W4 C/C ,FC Gr Te- xv /(a ;-If "o 0 Cttl( l,' c yL�us 17' IV41;1.,)r cu yr PET17-10NE_P.,S AT TRAIL_ AND sU �1 CLIFF s+�e�r I r.!Yal� yid c Yrs N � � N �� a ' r : • hrJr S� f � �>�'- � `' '°'f ��`��' I � o C •'.i !!o'o 6A r-„ N 3• r �'-o A2-► - , '' .&t?r' .'9.. 3 -t o •�� ;i io ,s7 ro.� •�__. �- '� k :Y P P t1��1.,.. Y•q' 3,•Jr ^�� �v'1 � /o � In0 ,oa',fy�; ��a! •r ? s. l•y __ /d _ '�J y. a 6r .!~ I a ♦ P4� S-5 L ..,s �a �•a •1] i, ` a'7^•. �f• G `,}h 4� rtJa C Y.� i,++/ J •y m \k��,{I > r �"'� a- ; r� -' o ' ;� y �- h�0, 4 v � 4'•Y �0 it � � ' N til' i ar �; u0 o u • �1• p g _ r'�•J• 40 ��b••�' p /fs + �' '• // 0 �� 'ate �� ^� t e% 8 J•. �]'- m S.' SS Qs , zz a,z _c� va IRA FQ ,� 1, `� C.7 ,•.LJg • Y t i � 1 1-13 f%. 2.!Z exl ty 'J] P 7 `wpb r' J/ •` �y -�` K.2�,. 3�s. _ ; rat : $`, u 4L4 t�•� \ b � a - so•zsztt ( ,z as 43 _ : 7 X ►rpt > t = �0• _ �•O,�•-- eZ o` I • �v .6.,y~" a .}\h ,2a ~ ` do c-q: /.,� \ -.JtiMd u �. • c 0 ,c�a rf�. +•.aMt�t Su � r-•:Tai '°�a^ \ \ 8,,• S 1 :23:3 .. `�,{- ut$ 9 sr z. M3 j b ' •`�0� IL • • M.c. D a z S ZA E a Z. •,� +R^• ems/ ♦• .y`a,�Y/ D ,.o as iy: 3 'a. • W at' � .•G 3 ' = "o so ■ ar rY. - C o 0.y. . ^• T ter 4 -asu �. a • Jy v:.a // u s"�• JQ `O♦ ::` s � �a r>a 3 .• � 0` _ ate` •__ Y ;� X2[72 >« :_ :�':';.L�c}:�. ••• ,( ".cps �� / ^*' J y+y AV M4 so E• � ,'S''�r•r �• �-�;-?'!'it'•:ii�--�}' '. p- s r� `a � 3t of, ca aara •, ■ *2,2- t 2R Sa a L ' I.a _,is ��. • r G 1•r rr : `titi4ti3i �e ._ hh O _ . — _ ! r _� fr 'wL M rp �.• + � .•._.. •J .`�c:. •�.Fi u,� ;i13 1� u4 m .. a r :.a,y4s $:i L•/d' 4• ze .,r. �f _ 1•�.•.:•:;.•...ti•::• i.'N � Ek i $ •-';.� lw. r u r�:. . :•a•?t�.ay �i��,� aa+ r 'r' !` ':•:•':r:•: ;':•;:•' 'no [ "- •. as 1, �•. �iM1 .671 to to to CasaKl LM f Ca s A 4,"P =r[�ar T '=•:r .�f'::';:rr {...' :may ssn m sa �y n L. % P \[S .!' apb`fJ• ��y r !: r +oa.a $ U N L^Ja' • — - anR� �' �s _ ai _ N .•/• 'r•.: -. •;:•: •L.� y`4''�9rt aa•M i sem• �.- �i ys w al}s. I 1. f r- .:}:•�• c o w co Cu r,. 4 _ :_:► :a `531 s1• :: ` :�• - �� w� aar � �l a,t. �� ••'�,� wrJ.•'y� 1'•�:::'I - I(, I �a 1 u :. -- i •`'•yyr S,w"• rY 2 _ .� � . + '°•a•'-Y:� �a • � i':. � :.y I- � : M Mei :o a,ti �; '. •� j� 1' °'ro o� y •_`-:`-i•:�ti•yir r : a :v • • 554 - - - s .. ,.••.• Ore•::: �;• :N �. Y r ♦ / �y • ♦ " y 5 3 Haiti ti•':: .. �1i}' 60 •:'• :•� F' r1Y I J yrs � � ,y • .Y: ,.; � `�• _•'�' . �' r ti �e : It_ CC•C '. [4G5 10009 i :aDD9 •,OGD! C . ¢ r ,.� r/ s i :: 00 a9: , OCCo- •a0 G9 i -'}ifw ti • m �� �O- i 91 Cllr M91 - . ¢s9 'ai[• SC \4 9 _ y 21 ' .� .a : �_' m`.; wiiZi J• t� r Y is .•,r Yd.l.7 J ¢fit t � i �g � � � 8 �. o y .g 6 � $ _ • �_. •Ir, �� . i� ,5 " _�_ •osc ^sti �y 0/o9� _xo9� Oxy R. O• .ao.9 - /r ,7 ti 4 a ja L {, � aAzr y±, • i Ca'n' � 09'' WO .' _ r. � r•a,,p • AC `t c•. :ice � �-. .• -s: _.J r i �'� WOl� a'C9 .0 [f_1. a 3930 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 ... EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-9100 July 31, 1985 i GLORIA JAHNKE 4300 SLPN CLIFF RD EAG,LN MN 55122 Re: Stop Sign Petition - Council Consideration Dear ids. Jahnke: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS "THEODORE WACHTER _ Councd memoers THOMAS HEDGES City Agmrtrstmfor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE GN Clerk Please be informed that on August 6, 1985 the City Council will consider your petition requesting the installation of a stop sign as requested on the attached petition. The Council 'will be considering your petition along with Staff's recommendation that the stop sign installation be denied. It is anticipated that this item will be discussed between 6:30 and 7:00 p.m. on that evening. This letter is being sent to your attention due to the fact that you are the first signature on this petition. I will leave it to your discretion as to whether you wish to inform the other petitioners of this pending Council consideration of your request on August 6. Sincerely, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Enclosure TAC/dk THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY �, Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Six BUILDING PERMIT FEE DEFERMENT REQUEST/MWCC 5. Building Permit Fee Deferment Request, MWCC Maintenance Facil- ity --The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) is proposing to build a maintenance, computer center and dispatch building on the northside of the future intersection of Kennebec Drive and Blackhawk Road. This facility is proposed to be located on Tract C of RLS #4 incorporating approximately 33 acres. However, they are intending to develop only approximately 5.5 acres of this tract for the development of their maintenance facility. Enclosed on page_— Z 7 is a location map showing the relationship of the proposed facility to the overall description of Tract C. Enclosed on page Z 8� is a letter wherein they request that certain fees due and payable at the time of the building permit issuance be deferred until the issuance of certificate of occupancy. This request results from a disagreement between the MWCC and their contractor pertaining to liability for payment of these fees. The MWCC is requesting this deferment to allow them an opportunity to pursue a resolution to this contract dispute. The second issue pertains to their request that these fees be calculated on the basis of their proposed 5.5 acre development and not on the .entire legally -described parcel (Tract C-33 +/- acres). Present City policy has been to calculate fees based on the area of the legally -described parcel being requested for development. The suggested alternative to the MWCC is the replat- ting of this parcel to create a new legally -described parcel for their maintenance facility. If this process is pursued, the staff would then calculate the associated fees based on this newly created parcel's size. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To approve/deny the deferment of the park fee, road -user fee and water treatment plant surcharge fee from the building permit issuance to the Certificate of Occupancy; and 2) To approve/deny a variance to the fee calculation policy restricting the area to the 5.5 acres of proposed development. 2140 . ��. Od °7 9 P.9) 3 a 2`. C O M S E R V NO. . Fi'. . ........ PART OF ..............ilii .. . .... . ........ LOT I . . ........ ... ... ......... :; isisii SL OCK ONE ..... ...... - ......... ............ . .......... ....... ........... . ......... .......... . ........ ..... .. . ... ...... .... ........ ... ..... . ........ . . ........ ...... .... ..... . ..... .. .......... . . ....... • C. .. .. ... ...... ... .... ... ... 01 0 ........ ... ............ 0 V6 . .......... H asb ......... .......... .. . ...... . ... ....... . ........... !No. ............ --p . . ..... . ..... . ............. 77 .......... ..... .. . .. .. . .... . ................. TRACT E .. .. ..... ......... .... . ...... ....... .... .... N .......... ........... ... ........ ... ................ ............... .... .............. . ........ ............. ..... ...... .. . .......... .. Lj; ............... .................... .................. .. .... ............ L/ ---- .... .. j.0 ........... . . ........... . ........... ..I. ........... ............ 0 00 0 TRACT A -1 LA HA5 5 c pa a A T, I 01� YQ TRACT F JC 42 Af �+•. u /del 0 METROPOLITAn --- WAlTE - - COnTROL CO(flmiffion Twin Goes Area September 24, 1985 Mr. Thomas Colbert Public Works Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Colbert: RE: Proposed MWCC Maintenance, Computer Center, and Dispatch Building MWCC Project Number 72-07 This letter is a request to postpone payment of the Park Fee, Road User Fee and the Water Treatment Plant Fee associated with the subject facility. A; discussed in the meeting of September 19, 1985, with Mr. C. Raymond Payne and Mr. Timothy F. Keegan of the Commission's staff, these fees will be paid prior to building occupancy in lieu of payment at the time the building permit is obtained, which we understand is the city's customary practice. All other fees associated with the building permit will be paid by our contractor at the time the building permit is obtained. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission understands the following rate structure will be utilized: Park Fee $1,742.00/Acre Road User Fee $ 840.00/Acre Water Treatment Fee $ 132.00/SAC Unit The Commission intends to develop only that portion of its property as described in attachment "A". Based on this description the total acreage to be utilize' for the proposed facility is 5.5 acres. It is therefore further requested thati the above fees be based on the 5.5 acres described in the attachment. Should the Commission decide to further develop its properties in Eagan, the appropriate fees will be paid at that time. If you have any questions in this regard, please contact Mr. Keegan of the Commission's staff. Sincerely, Louis J. Br1m urst Chief Administrator cc: Dave Phillips, Phillips -Klein Company Brad Lemberg, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik LJB:TFK:CLL �r 350 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-222-8423 Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Seven 6. Erosion Control Manual, Adoption/Implementation -- During 1984, a concerted effort was made by the staff to prepare a comprehensive Erosion Control Manual for the City of Eagan. Forwarded to the Council without page number is a copy of the completed Erosion Control Manual. Enclosed on pages 55_ through _5 is as nopsis of this Manual for easy review. Enclosed on pages �-4 and 3� is a letter from the Dakota County Soil & Water Conservation District indicating their review, concurrence and strong support of the implementation of this Manual. Enclosed on pager] are suggested revisions and modifications to the existing City Code that are recommended for adoption subsequent to approval of this Manual and its contents. Enclosed on page is a letter that was sent to representative developers, engineers and contractors as identified by the mailing list enclosed on pageAs a result of this mailing, the staff did not receive any omments, complaints, suggestions or revisions other than a verbal response from Mr. Jim Curry who indicated he thought it "looked good". While the staff recognizes that the initial enforcement of the Manual will be difficult due to public awareness, lack of staff for total compliance enforcement and the need for voluntary com- pliance by developers and builders, it is important that a formal Manual be adopted to provide strength in instances where enforcement has to be pursued. ' ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/modify/deny the City of Eagan's Erosion Control Manual and, if approved, authorize a revision to current City Codes accordingly. �• f MEMO TO: ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FROM: EDWARD MEISTER DATE: JUNE 20, 1984 REGARDING: SYNOPSIS OF EAGAN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FIELD MANUAL PURPOSE The purpose of this manual is to *provide individuals with precise practices that, when implemented, abate the problems of accelerated erosion resulting from human construction activities. This manual is provided for by Chapt-ar_ :13.30, Subdivision 13, of the Eagan City Codes. BASIC PRINCIPLES OF EROSION CONTROL There are nine essential principles of erosion and sediment control upon which all of the conservation practices are based, as follows: (1) The disturbed area and the duration of exposure to erosion elements should be minimized. (2) Stabalize disturbed areas immeciately. (3) Keep storm water runoff velocities low. (4) Protect disturbed and steep areas from storm water runoff. (5) Control, reduce, and delay storm water runoff. (6) Retain sediment. (7) Fit the activity to the topography and soils. (R) Do not encroach upon watercourses. (9) Implement a thorough maintenance and follow-up program. CONSERVATION PRACTICES The manual is primarily composed of conservation or soil erosion abatement practices to be employed for specific land disturbing activities. The major divisions of the practices are as follows: (A) ROAD STABILIZATION (B) SEDIMENT BARRIERS ?O _ MEMO TO: ALL INTERESTED PERSONS DATE: JUNE 20, 1984 PAGE TWO (C) DIKES and DIVERSIONS (D) SEDIMENT TRAPS and BASINS (E) FLUMES (F) WATERWAYS and OUTLET PROTECTION (G) DRAINAGE PROTECTION (H) PLANT ESTABLISHMENT (I) MULCHES (J) TREES Each practices, 26 in all, gives a practice description, const- ruction specifications, conditions where practice applies, and a maintenance section of the implemented practice. Some practices, for example 7.2 SUBSURFACE DRAIN, include planning considerations and design criteria that are fully illustrated. ENFORCEMENT The process of implementing the manual will be facilitated by the standardized forms on pages 178-186 that have been developed. These are as follows: SCREENING FORM, APPLICATION FOR LAND DISTURB- ING PERMIT, INSPECTION REPORT, NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT, AGREEMENT IN LIEU OF AN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN A SUBDIVISION. A construction project is subject to inspection at any time. The inspector should notify the owner or his representative before conducting an official inspection. If the inspection determines that there is a violation on the site, it is his job to secure compliance. At first a verbal warning or an inspector report is used as an initial notification that there is problems. If the problem persists, the inspector will issue a Notice to Comply which outlines the corrective measures which must be taken and the deadline for compliance. The next _stage of enforcement actions could involve permit revocation, governing performance quarantee on the project to implement the conservation plan. Final stage of enforcement would be bringing criminal charges against the owner since a violation of the manual is a misdemeanor. use of manual The manual will operate as the City's official erosion control policy and procedure document. The management practices will be useful for the conservation plans submitted for each development project. The conservation plan is an independant document, narrative and site plan, that deals soley with the control of erosion and sedimentation. The Eagan Manual will facilitate a standardization of conservation practices that is often missing from the conservation plans. 3/ - MEMO TO: ALL INTERESTED PERSONS DATE: JUNE 20, 1984 PAGE THREE Each management practice has its own code number, coded letter symbol, and drawn symbol indicator for use on site plans and conservation plans. GOOD CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Good construction management requires an understanding of three basic principles; 1. Erosion contol is the first line of defense. 2. Sediment control is the second line of defense. 3. Coordination of erosion and sediment controls will maximize effectiveness. EDWARD MEISTER EAM/mam -321- MINNESOTA SOIL AND WATER June 20, 1984 DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Ed Miester- City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Ed: RE: Review of Eagan Erosion Control Manual Farmington Professional Building 821 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: (612) 463.8626 Congratulations! You have put together an excellent Erosion and Sediment Control Manual. After reading chapters I and II and the appendicies I felt I had read a condensed textbook on urban erosion control. The information you have presented is concise, accurate and comprehensive in relation to defining soil erosion and sediment problems and procedures necessary to solve them, including maintenance and follow-up. Because of an agreement we have with the USDA -Soil Conservation Service I am not at leave to review or comment on chapter III of your document, If cont- inuous maitenance is performed and the contractor and inspector are aware of potential soil erosion and sediment problems a multitude of practices can and will work to protect the resource. In your continued development of the erosion and sediment control ordinance and distribution of this document, it may be to your advantage to provide training to site inspectors, developers, engineers, contractors, etc. covering the principals identified in this manual. If you are interested in examining this idea further please contact me, I would be very willing to provide assistance in organizing and operating such a session(s). J:�; AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER O Ed Miester, City of Eagan Review of Eagan Erosion Control Manual page 2 You may also want to organize an on-site inspection visit at least twice a year, to ensure that the measures identified in this document are actually being carried out. I would suggest once before freeze up in the fall and after snow melt in the spring. Again if you desire assistance in carrying out this suggestion I would be very willing_, to assist. I believe you have completed an excellent manual that should be very effective if followed. I wish you luck in enforcing your city's erosion and sediment control ordinance. Sincerely, Brian R. Christensen District Coordinator BRC/ smm HAUGE, SMITH, EIDE & SELLER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER Mr. Ed Meister Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 9908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 June 12, 1984 Re: Code Reference to City Erosion and Sediment Control Manual Dear Ed: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 454-4224 Enclosed please find proposed amendments to the Eagan City Code to provide reference to the City's new Erosion and Sediment Control Manual as suggested by your packet of information dated June 5, 1984. The provisions of the Code that would appear to be impacted by the need to reference this new manual are Section 4.30, Subd. 3.B.6., Section 13.20, Subd. 2 and Section 13.30, Subd. 15.H.1. Section 13.20, Subd. 2 references Section 4.30. Therefore, the need for amended wording appears to be in 4.30 rather than 13.20, Subd.2. Please advise if we are correct in our assumption that all is needed is a reference to the Erosion and Sediment Control Manual as suggested by the amended wording described below: Ole- 4.30, Subd. 3.B.6. Method and schedule for restoration and measures to control erosion during and after the work in compliance with the Citv's Erosion and Sediment Control Manual. 6�C 13.30, Subd. 15.H.1. Guaranteed completion of development site grading and drainage with the _erosion control measures as required b the City Erosion and Sediment Control Manual to provide overall development street and lot grades in accordance with the approved detailed grading, drainage, and erosion control plans submitted by the applicant. The underlined wording is the new wording provided by our office. If these changes do not meet the City's engineering needs, please elaborate further. If the revisions are acceptable, we will put them in draft form subsequent to your approval. Very truly yours, David G. Keller Assistant City Attorney — City of Eagan skk .3s cc: Rich Hefti ;i Il�u citV , 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 JUNE 19, 1985 Re: City of Eagan Erosion Control Manual BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Enclosed please find a copy of the City of Eagan's proposed Erosion Control Manual. Before the City Council officially adopts this manual, they would like to have your input. Please submit any comments you may have in writing to my attention no later then July 10, 1985 for official Council action to be taken Tuesday, July 16, 1985. I would also urge your attendance at this meeting if you have comments that you wish Council to hear. I will be anxiously awaiting your comments regarding the City's proposed Erosion Control Manual. Sincerely, Richard M. ti Acting City Engineer cc: Tom Hedges, City Administrator RMH:jeh Enclosure 3� THE LONE OAK TREE ..THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY PAGE NO. 00001 09/14/85 NAME Rod Hardy Jim Nervig Pat Hoffman Bob Worthington Larry Frank Ed Dunn Loren Spande Richard Winkler Attn: Manager Jim Curry Jim Hill Ralph Wagner Bill Price Jack McCreery Tip Enebak Attn: Manager EROSION CONTROL MANUAL RECIPIENTS COMPANY Sienna Corporation Orin Thompson -Homes Advance Developers OPUS Corp. Northland Development Developers Construction Tomark Development J.R. Hill Inc. Probe Engineering Company Suburban Engineering Johnson Brothers Corp. Enebak Construction Company D.L.R. Construction 37 Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eight There are fifteen (15) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTOR LICENSES A. Contractor Licenses --Enclosed on page 0is a list of contrac- tors who are renewing or who have bee selected and retained as a builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside in Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipal- ities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of contractor licenses as presented. LM CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES OCTOBER 1, 1985 1.) GOOD VALUE HOMES, INC. 2.) C.F. HAGLIN & SONS CO., INC. 3.) LEIBFRIED CONSTRUCTION, INC: 4.) MITTELSTAEDT BROS. CONSTRUCTION 5.) RITE WAY CONSTRUCTION 6.) TILSEN HOMES, INC. WN -ala• I= • i v--�- HEATING/VENTILATING 1.) DEAN'S HEATING & A/C 2.) NUEBEI, PLUMBING & HEATING PLUMBING 1.) NORTHRIDGE PLUMBING CO. 2.) NUEBEL PLUMBING & HEATING 3.) RICHFM PIUDMING 4.) SCHERER PLUMBING 5.) LEE STULL 6.) GREG wERNER PLUMBING 3y MASONRY CEMENT 1.) CONCRETE CONCEPTS Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Nine MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT/METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION B. Police Department Mutual Aid Agreement with Metropolitan Airports Commission --The Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, for Dakota County, David Gisch, is requesting adoption of a mutual aid agreement with the. Metropolitan Airports Commission. The County is entering into the joint agreement along with the cities of Mendota Heights and Eagan. The agreement specifically relates to the joint and cooperative use of police personnel and equipment. The agreement provides for an automatic assistance program if an air disaster should occur adjacent to the airport. The agree- ment allows the Metropolitan Airports Commission to call upon the Eagan Police Department and ask for both manpower and equip- ment assistance if an emergency should occur. The agreement has been reviewed by the Citv Attorney's office and has been found to be in order for consideration. Chief of Police Berthe has reviewed the document and is recommending its approval by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the agreement for joint and cooperative use of police personnel and equipment with the Metropolitan Airports Commission as presented. APPROVAL OF ELECTION JUDGES/MUNICIPAL ELECTION C. Approval of Election Judges for Mu icpal Election to be Held November 5, 1985 --Enclosed on page_ is a list of election judges to be employed during the November 5, 1985, municipal election. This list is presented by the City Clerk's office for consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of election judges for the November 5, 1985, municipal election. N DEMOCRATS Elaine Jones Barbara Edgerton Evelyn Cota Sharon Schoeller Patricia Kaeder Rosemary J Piekarski Barbara Shields Louise Johnson Mary Kellner Marty Dehler Ilene Hazel Orlean Garness Al Jarvi Barbara Boyd DT: nT7DT Tn AXTc Mary Jane LaRock Rose Vimr .Marilyn Murray Aurelia Poppler Marilyn Legler June Ketcham Kari Vihovde Judy Allen Merlyn Handley Stan Westenberg Ethel Groff Jane Pettit Lyle Severson Avis Kriebel INDEPENDENTS Marge DiIoia Karen Flood CITY OF EAGAN ELECTION JUDGES CITY ELECTION NOVEMBER 5, 1985 Jean Loken Andrina Kuechle William Reid Pauline Legendre Eunice Johnson Emily Rodich Bev Popp Anna Lou Arneson Peggy Sanford Patricia Gerwing Elinor Villelli Carolyn Thurston Patricia Rask Judith Mundahl Carol Vihovde Marie Lane Sharon Astelford Helen Westenberg Michelle Skindelien Vivian Handley Patti Benjamin Janet Linkert Karon Factor Nancy Jarvi Emily Medin Adrienne Fox Adeline Buehler Moonyeen Bongaards Judy Kerry Marge Jacobs Jan Giefer Harold Peterson Joan Uselmann Gerri Chapdelaine Laura Lundberg Helen Jarvi Dorothy LeMay Gilbert Sydow Pearl LeMieux Judith Miller Jean Zempel Agenda Information Memo October 1,,1985, City Council Meeting Page Ten GRADING PERMIT/WHISPERING WOODS 2ND D. Approve Grading Permit#EX31-195, Whispering Woods 2nd Addition (Hilla) -- We have received an application for a grading/excavation permit to proceed with the development of the Whispering Woods 2nd Addition which received a preliminary plat approval by Council action on September 3,. 1985, all application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve grading permit #EX31-195, Whispering Woods 2nd Addition (Hilla). FEASIBILITY REPORT/CLIFF ROAD/GRADING, BASE & PAVING E. Authorize Feasibility Report, Cliff Road (East of T.H. 3) Grading, Base and Paving -- As a part of Dakota County's five-year capital improvements program (CIP), they are proposing to upgrade Cliff Road (County Road 32) from T.H. 3 to County Road 71 in Inver Grove Heights. This' upgrading will be performed over a two-year time frame, with the grading gravel base being performed in 1986 and a two-lane bituminous surface paving being performed in 1987. Due to the fact that the City of Eagan will be required to participate in 450 of the cost associated with this improvement, it will be necessary to prepare a feasibility report and hold a public hearing in order to assess the adjacent benefitted properties from this proposed improvement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 463 (Cliff Road - east of T.H. 3). Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eleven APPOINTMENT OF CAROLYN BRAUN/AIRPORT NOISE COMMITTEE F. Appointment of Carolyn Braun to the Airport Noise Committee -- The Airport Noise Committee originally consisted of eight (8) residents serving an indefinite term. One of those members, Mr. Roger Sperling, did resign from the committee during 1984. There are now seven (7) residents who serve as members of the committee. Those persons are Tom Baker, Don Giblin, John Gustin, Joe Harrison, Bart Schmidt, Bob Swenson, and Carol Duzois. Some of the members are not consistent in attendance at the committee meetings which- can be addressed at the Organizational Meeting in January. Carolyn Braun, who resides at 3732 Pilot Knob Road, has been in regular attendance and during the past several meetings is becoming regarded as a committee member. Her presence often allows the committee to have a quorum and, therefore, it is the recommendation of the committee that Carolyn Braun be appointed as a member of the Airport Noise Committee. Ms. Braun indicated to Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmember Egan, both of whom were present at the last meeting, that she would like to be ap- pointed to this committee. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint Carolyn Braun, who resides at 3732 Pilot Knob Road, to the Aiport Noise Committee. �3 Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twelve PROJECT 85-24/AWARD BIDS G. Project 85-24 to Award Bids for Paving Parking Lots at Rahn Park & Ridgecliff Park --A bid opening is planned for Monday, September 30, 1985, to receive bids for the paving of parking lots at both Rahn Park & Ridgecliff Park. The bids will be reviewed by City staff and the copy of the tabulation and a recommendation is to be included withthe Administrative Agenda packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider and award the bid for Project -85-24 to the successful bidder. CORRECTION OF JUNE 4, 1985, MINUTES H. Correction of June 4, 1985, Minutes --It was discovered that the minutes of the June 4, 1985, regular City Council meeting include a motion that reads as follows: "Smith moved, Egan seconded the motion to approve the application for rezoning subject to the following:..." Those minutes should have read "preliminary plat" instead of "rezoning." ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To correct the June 4, 1985, City Council minutes ori page 9 to remove rezoning and insert preliminary plat to clearly record the intended action at that meeting. AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE I. Amusement Device License --A license application was presented by Theisen Vending for two (2) amusement device machines at Al Baker's located at 3434 Washington Drive. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amusement device license for Al Baker's as presented. ON Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen RIGHT OF ENTRY AGMT., MWCC (CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PK) TRUNK STORM SEWER J. Project 428, Right of Entry Agreement, MWCC (Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer)-- Contract 85-5 has recently been awarded providing for the installation of the trunk storm sewer through the Cedar Industrial Park. This construction required the acquisi- tion of both permanent and temporary construction easements across property owned by MWCC. While the .actual easements have not been acquired, the MWCC has agreed to granting the City of Eagan a "right of entry" until such time as the acquisition of the easements can be resolved. Enclosed on pages �Z and is a copy of the Right of Entry Agreement which places cer ain liability on the City of Eagan and protects the MWCC's rights to request payment for the dedication of the required easements but does not delay the progress of the construction. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the MWCC Right of Entry Agreement for Project 428 (Cedar Industrial Park trunk storm sewer) and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. �5 mETROPOLITAn WAITE COnTROI commiinon Uin Gues RreQ September 11, 1985 Mr. Ralph W. Corey Assistant City Attorney City of Eagan Hauge, Smith & Eide 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Corey: RE: Storm Sewer Improvements Cedar Industrial Park - City of Eagan The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission utility easements on property owned by the Wastewater Treatment Plant. The easements structing City trunk and lateral storm sew referenced.improvement project. PR.eT Ya8 has reviewed your request for Commission at its Seneca are for the purpose of Gon- ers associated with the above The easements include both permanent and temporary construction easements and are described in the easement descriptions prepared by Sigma Survey- ing Services and enclosed hereto as Easement Exhibits A, B and C. It is understood that the temporary easements are to terminate on December 31, 1986. The Commission, at its meeting of April 16, 1985, passed a resolution concurring with the improvements to the Cedar Industrial Park project. The resolution, however, did not include authorization to convey to the City any property or interest therein owned by the Commission. Therefore, it will be necessary to secure the approval of the Commission prior to the formal conveyance of any easement documents. The Commission staff will present this matter to the Commission for their consideration at its October 15, 1985 meeting. In the meantime, this letter grants to the City and/or its contractor the right to enter onto the property, as described in the Easement Exhibits A, B and C for the purposed of making the necessary storm sewer improvements. The Commission, however, reserves the right to request or accept payment for the conveyance of the property interests, as described herein or any other damages arising from the City of Eagan storm sewer project which may be offered by the City or otherwise determined by eminent domain or dis- trict court proceedings. 4 350 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-222-8423 Mr. Ralph W. Corey Page Two 9.12.85 The City of Eagan must also agree to indemnify and hold harmless the Commission, its employees and agents from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including attorney's fees, arising out of or resulting from the City's construction of the Cedar Industrial Park storm sewer improvements on the property described in the Ease- ment Exhibits A, B, and C. Please have the appropriate officials of the City sign the original of this letter and return to the Commission. Such execution will constitute the City's agreement to the indemnifica- tion described above and other conditions stated in this letter. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact the Commission. Very truly yours, ' Louis J. Breimhurst Chief Administrator LJB:EJB:blm Enclosures cc: Thomas Hedges;/City Administrator, City of Eagan M. D. Thompson, MWCC E. J. DeLaForest, MWCC J. G. Wawra, MWCC R. E. Isakson, MWCC 07 City of Eagan By By Its e ITY CCc1ZK Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen PETITION/FEASIBILITY REPORT/WYNDHAM CORPORATE CTR SANITARY SEWER K. Project 464, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Wyndham Corporate Center - Sanitary Sewer) -- The staff has received a petition requesting the City's installation of a sanitary sewer to service the proposed Wyndham Corporate Center development by Trammel Crow in the southwest corner of Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive extended. In executing this petition, the developer has guaranteed all costs associated with the preparation of this report if for some reason the project is not approved at the time of the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 464 (Wyndham Corporate Center - sanitary sewer). GRADING PERMIT/LEXINGTON SQUARE 2ND ADDITION L. Approve Grading Permit #EX23-215, Lexington Square 2nd Addition (Northland Mortgage) -- We have received an application for a grading/excavation permit -for the future phased construction of the Lexington Square 2nd Addition by Northland Mortgage Company which received original preliminary plat approval by Council action March 22, 1984. All permit materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve grading permit #EX23-215 for the Lexington Square 2nd Addition as requested by Northland Mortgage Company. Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen GRADING PERMIT/OAKWOOD ADDITION M. Approve Grading Permit No. EX04-165, Oakwood Addition (Vince Kennedy) -- We have received an application for a grading/excavation permit for the development of the Oakwood Addition by Vince Kennedy which received preliminary plat approval by Council action on November 20, 1984. All permit materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve grading permit #EX04-165, Oakwood Addition as requested by Vince Kennedy. �9 Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Sixtedn PROJECT 420/PEACEFUL HEIGHTS A. Project 420, Final Assessment Hearing (Peaceful Heights - Streets and Utilities) - On September 3, the final assessment roll for Project 420 was presented to the City Council with the final assessment hearing scheduled for October 1, 1985. Enclosed on page 511 is a summary tabulation of the final assessment rates as compared to those estimated in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing being held on October 1, 1985. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to the affected property owners informing them of the public hearing to be held on October 1, 1985. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 420 (Peaceful Heights Addition - Streets and Utilities) and authorize the certification to the County for collections for unpaid assessments to be spread over ten years at 10.0% interest. ,1D d FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 420 SUBDIVISION/AREA: PEACEFUL HEIGHTS FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: OCTOBER 1, 1985 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES SANITARY QArea Fl Area FINAL F.R. RATES RATES Laterals $6.125.69/lot$10,180/lot n Laterals $1n,771.0£i/1`t $19,69510 Service F-1 Service n Lat. Benefit/Trunk $2,109.00/lot $2,109/10 F� Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM El Area © Laterals $6,898.74/lot $12,030/loi STREETS 0 Gravel Base ® Surfacing, Res. Equiv. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 2 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 10 RATE OF INTEREST: 10% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $108,322.84 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 420 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 1, 1985 SERVICES-* FINAL RATES F.R. RATES LOT 1 BLK 1 $1,587.22 OUTLOT A $3,174.43 * Both sanitary and water 611 $26.376.081/lot $26,600/ Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen PROTECT 330ZLEXINGTON AVENUE B. Project 330, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington Avenue - Streets and Storm Sewer) - On September 3, the final assessment roll for Project 330 was presented to the City Council with the final assessment hearing scheduled for October 1, 1985. Enclosed on page -63 is a summary tabulation of the final assessment rates as compared to those estimated in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on March 1, 1983. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to the affected property owners informing them of the public hearing to be held on October 1, 1985. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 330 (Lexington Avenue - Streets and Storm Sewer) and authorize the certification to the County for collection of unpaid assessments to be spread over ten years at 11.0% interest. �v FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 330 SUBDIVISION/AREA: New Lexington Ave. (Co. Rd. No. 43) FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: October 1. 1985 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES ❑ Area Laterals Service Lat. Benefit/Trunk FINAL F. R. SANITARY RATES RATES Area Laterals $5,428.75 Total Service Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM STREETS , Area-Com/Ind. Eq. $0.0647/sf 0.0647/sf ❑ Gravel Base Ex Area -Multiple Eq. $0.0539/sf 0.0539/sf Qx Laterals-Com/Ind. $0.0589/sf 0.0464/sf ❑ Surfacing Laterals-Com/Ind. $0.0710/sf 0.0559/sf ❑x Res. Equiv. Multiple $30.79/ff 33.14/FF �x Com./Ind. Eq. $36.01/ff 37.74/FF NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 18 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 10 Years _."',:,;-_"4. RATE OF INTEREST: 11.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $629,100.14 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: City Contract 43-06 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: March 1, 1983 Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING (DIFFLEY RD) C. Project 306, Final Assessment Hearing (Diffley Road - Streets & Storm Sewer) -- On September 3, the Council received the final assessment roll for the above -referenced project and scheduled the final assessment hearing to be held on October 1. This project provided for the upgrading of Diffley Road (County Road 30) from Blackhawk Road to approximately 300' east of Nicols Road. This project also included the upgrading of the frontage roads adjacent to the Cedar Grove 1st & 2nd Additions. As the Council may recall, on August 7, 1984, the final assessment hearing was held for those single-family residential property owners adjacent to these frontage roads prior to the completion of this County road improvement. This was due to the fact that these frontage road property owners were to be assessed at the same residential equivalent rate as established for the reconstruc- tion of the internal residential streets under Project 342 (Cedar Grove lst & 2nd Addition - reconstruction). The remainders of the properties could not have their final assessment hearing held until the project had been completed and the final assessment rates determined based on final construction costs. It has been discovered that there has been an error in the notifica- tion process for the remaining property's final assessment hearing scheduled for October 1. Die to the recent personnel situation in the Special Assessment's Division, the mailing list for the previous assessment hearing on August 7, 1984, was reused in lieu of the original mailing list delineating the remaining properties. Subsequently, all properties proposed to be assessed under this project have not received their individual notification of this final assessment hearing. Therefore, it is the staff's recommendation that this final assessment hearing be continued until October 15 to allow the staff to proceed with the proper notification as required by statutes. A special letter of explanation will be attached to all notices informing the property owners of this situation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public final assessment hearing for Project 306 (Diffley Road - streets and storm sewer) to October 15, 1985. Note: Enclosed on page is a summary tabulation of the final assessment rates. 6�1 I• FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 306 SUBDIVISION/AREA: DIFFLEY ROAD FROM: NICOLS ROAD TO: BLACKHAWK ROAD FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: OCTOBER 1, 1985 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES QArea 0 Laterals 0 Service 0 Lat. Benefit/Trunk FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES Area Laterals Service Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM STREETS ' uArea Surfacing Commercial; $53.48 48.50 -1 Laterals $11.57 $7.43 X Surfacing $47.16 48.50 Multi le Surfacing i Full Residential)2..-- 526 25.00 (� Surfacing r` (Frontage Road) ,2�+166.00^ Sd-we NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 42 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 RATE OF INTEREST::. -.,,....,.11.0 '/.=......:::.,,..:...,. TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $338,244.02 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: County Project 30-01 i PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 2-1-83 Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Ninetden PUBLIC HEARING (EAGANDALE COURT & AREA) D. Project 456, Public Hearing (Eagandale Court & Area - Streets & Utilities) -- In response to a petition submitted by the de- velopers of the proposed Eagandale Center Industrial Park #7 Addition, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on September 3 with the public hearing being ordered for October 1. Enclosed on pages : through �-3 is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's referenc& and review during this public hearing. All notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners along with a copy of the report being forwarded to the developer for their review and comment prior to the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To and approve/deny Project 456 (Eagandale utilities) and, if approved, authorize the plans and specifications. �/ close the public hearing Court - streets and preparation of detailed REPORT ON EAGANDALE COURT UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT No. 456 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49368 Bamed 4w,. Ra "w, yqm&*lila a 4ddac& t d, Am cep pm#"e" St. pawl, Af&we"ta Boo ,- 2�_ , 4_K44" &_4" , 9,tc. 2335 V 7,..,.4 36 — S:. P...4 (—..,.& 55113 PA. -612-636-4600 September 3, 1985 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Eagandale Court Utility & Street Improvement Project No. 456 File No. 49368 Dear Mayor and Council: Otto G Bonestroo, P.E. Robert W. Rwrnt, P.E. Jnseph C Anded k, P.E. Bradford A. Lemberg. P.E. Richard E. Turner, P.E. James C. Olson, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keith A. Gordon, P.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. Richard W. Foster, P.E. Robert G. Schunicht, P.£. Marvin L. Sorvolo, P.E. Donald C. Burgordr. P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T. Raurmann. P.E. Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E. Dovtd O. Loskota, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M. OLson Transmitted herewith is our report for Eagandale Court, Project No. 456. This report covers sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer and street construction and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00) ROSENEE,, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the.,State of _'nnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: September 3, 1985 Reg. No. 14260 Approved By Department of Public Works Date: 0454d - U SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and s.treet within Eagandale Court. Eagandale Court is lo- cated westerly of Eagandale Boulevard midway between Corporate Center Drive and Lone Oak Road. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: SANITARY SEWER - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes constructing an 8" diameter PVC sanitary sewer in Eagandale Court as shown on the attached draw- ing. The sanitary sewer will connect to an existing 9" VCP in Eagandale Bou- levard where a manhole will have to be constructed over the existing sewer. WATER MAIN: Water main proposed herein includes constructing an 8" diameter water main in Eagandale Court and continuing to Burnside Avenue as shown on the attached drawing. The water main will connect to an existing 12" CIP water main in Eagandale Boulevard and an existing 8" DIP in Burnside Avenue. For both the water main and sanitary sewer construction, it may be necessary to close Eagandale Boulevard for 3 or 4 days. If this is necessary, then a possible detour route could be along Eagan Industrial Road and West Service Road. STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing a 30" diameter RCP storm sewer in Eagandale Court as shown on the attached drawing. A 27", 18", and 15" diameter RCP storm sewer stubs will be extended from the cul-de- sac to the right-of-way line for future extensions as development occurs. A 36" diameter RCP storm sewer will be extended southerly in the westerly boule- vard of Eagandale Boulevard from Eagandale Court and connect to an existing Page 1. 0454d Sf 48" RCP. However, the 48" line is not adequate to handle storm runoff from the Eagan Industrial Park area. Because of this, the Council authorized Proj- ect No. 458, Eagandale Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer, which proposes to extend a trunk storm sewer northerly from Lone Oak Road and connect to the 36" RCP proposed as part of this project. This trunk storm sewer will provide the necessary additional capacity to handle the runoff from the Eagandale Indus- . trial Park. Project 458 will propose construction of the trunk storm sewer in 1986. STREET: Street construction proposed herein includes a 40' wide street con- structed to a 9 ton design thickness. Street construction will consist of bi- tuminous surfacing, concrete curb and gutter, and restoration. EASEMENTS: This project requires that the City obtain a road and utility easement for Eagandale Court and utility easements for water main and storm sewer. Eagandale Court will require a 66' wide roadway and utility easement along with a 60' radius for the turn around. This will require easements over por- tions of Lot 14 and Lot 6 of Block 4 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park and a small portion of Lot 3, Block 1 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 7. The water main construction across Lot 3, Block 1 of Eagandale Center In- dustrial Park No. 7 will require a 20' wide utility easement. The storm sewer construction of the 36" pipe parallel to Eagandale Boule- vard will require a 20' wide utility and drainage easement across the easterly portion of Lot 14, Block 4 of Eagandale Industrial Park. The City anticipates acquiring these easements -at no cost. Page 2. 0454d /0 AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 6, Block 4 Lot 14, Block 4 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 7 Lot 3, Block 1 COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: Sanitary Sewer $ 22,660 Water Main 39,400 Storm Sewer 43,530 Street 53,020 TOTAL ................. $158,610 The total estimated project cost is $158,610 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of sanitary sewer to Lot 6, Block 4 Eagandale Center Industrial Park. Trunk area sanitary sewer was previously assessed. WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess the total cost of water main equally to Lot 6 & 14, Block 4 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Lot 3, Block 1 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 7. Trunk area water was previously as - sassed. Page 3. 0454d STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of storm sewer equally to Lot 6 & 14, Block 4 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Lot 3, Block 1 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 7. Storm sewer within the Eagan In- dustrial Park has been assessed, however, this area will still be responsible for future trunk area assessments levied as part of the Eagandale Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer Project No. 458. Project 458 will provide for the northerly trunk storm sewer extension from Lone Oak Road which is anticipated to occur in 1986. STREET: It is proposed to assess the total cost of street equally to Lot 6 & 14, Block 4 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Lot 3, Block 1 of Eagan - dale Center Industrial Park No. 7. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: No funds will be required from the major trunk funds to finance this project. Page 4. 0454d 1j Project Cost Revenue Balance A. SANITkRY SEWER Lateral $22,660 Lateral Assessment $22,660 Total $22,660 $22,660 - 0 - B. WATER MAIN Lateral $39,400 Lateral Assessment $39,400 Total $39,400 $39,400 - 0 - C. STORM SEWER Lateral $43,530 Lateral Assessment $43,530 Total $43,530 $43,530 - 0 - E. STREET Lateral $53,020 Lateral Assessment $53,020 Total $98,940 $98,940 - 0 - TOTAL - 0 - No funds will be required from the major trunk funds to finance this project. Page 4. 0454d 1j PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 5. 0454d 0 September 3, 1985 October 1, 1985 October 1, 1985 November 1, 1985 November 5, 1985 Spring, 1986 Summer, 1986 May, 1987 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE EAGANDALE COURT UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 456 A. SANITARY SEWER 540 Lin.ft. '8" PVC Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $13.00/lin.ft. $ 7,020 80 Lin.ft. 6" PVC Sanitary sewer service in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 960 3 Each Standard 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 2,850 15 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/lin.ft. 1,050 2 Each 8"x6" wye in place @ $50.00/each 100 1 Each Construct MH over existing 9" VCP @ $500.00/each 500 100 Sq.yds. Bituminous mixture for patch @ $25.00/each 2,500 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 620 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 620 Total $ 16,600 +5% Contingencies 830 $ 17,430 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 5,230 TOTAL ............................................ $ 22,660 Page 6. 0454d !_ B. WATER MAIN 1,000 Lin. ft. 8" DIP Water main in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft. $ 14,000 10 Lin. ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 120 1 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 5 Each 8" Resilient wedge gate valve and box @ $450.00/each 2,250 2,500 Lbs. Fittings in place @ $1.80/lb. 3,750 1 Each Wet tap 8" DIP to existing 12" CIP @ $1,500.00/each 1,500 1 Each Wet tap 8" DIP to existing 8" DIP @ $1,500.00/each 1,500 90 Sq.yds. Bituminous mixture for patch @ $25.00/sq.yd. 2,250 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 0.5 Acre Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/acre 500 990 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 990 Total $ 28,860 +5y Contingencies 1,450 $ 30,310 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 9,090 TOTAL............................................. $ 39,400 Page 7. 0454d 45 C. STORM SEWER 130 Lin.ft. 36" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $42.00/lin.ft. $ 5,460 410 Lin.ft. 30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft. 14,760 20 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $31.00/lin.ft. 620 110 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 2,640 100 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $20.00/lin.ft. 2,000 3 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 2,850 1 Each Std. 6' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,500.00/each 1,500 2 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each +5% Contingencies 800 1 Each Connect 36" RCP to ex. MH @ $500.00/each 500 750 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 750 0454d Total $ 313880 +5% Contingencies 12600 $ 33,480 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 10.050 TOTAL ............................................ $ 43,530 D. STREET 2,580 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $0.50/sq.yd. $ 1,290 600 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $2.50/cu.yd. 1,500 400 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $5.00/cu.yd. 2,000 1,300 Ton Class 5, 100% crushed quarry rock @ $7.00/ton 9,100 450 Ton 2331 Bituminous binder course @ $11.00/ton 4,950 225 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $12.00/ton 2,700 35 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $210.00/ton 7,350 150 Ton Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.00/gal. 150 1,080 Lin.ft. Concrete curb & gutter in pl. @ $5.00/lin.ft. 5,400 8 Each Adjust MH & CB frame @ $150.00/each 1,200 2 Each Adjust 6 U.I. Box @ $100.00/each 200 3.0 Acre Seed with mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/acre 3,000 Total $ 38,840 +5% Contingencies 1,940 $40,780 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 12:240 TOTAL ............. ... ........................ Page 8. $ 53,020 0454d / A. Sanitary Sewer B. Water Main C. Storm Sewer D. Street TOTAL ........................ Page 9. 0454d 7 $ 22,660 39,400 43,530 53,020 $158,610 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL EAGANDALE COURT UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 456 A. SANITARY SEWER Parcel No. Cost Total Description of Lots /Lot Assessment EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 6, Block 4 1 $229660 $22,660 Total 1 $22,660 B. WATER MAIN EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 6, Block 4 1 $13,133 $13,133 Lot 14, Block 4 1 13,133 13,133 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 7 Lot 3, Block 1 1 13,133 13,133 Total 3 $39,400 C. STORM SEWER EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 6, Block 4 1 $14,510 $14,510 Lot 14, Block 4 1 14,510 14,510 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 7 Lot 3, Block 1 1 14,510 14,510 Total 3 $43,530 D. STREET EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 6, Block 4 1 $17,673 $17,673 Lot 14, Block 4 1 17,673 17,673 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 7 Lot 3, Block 1 1 $17,673 $17,673 Total 3 $53,020 Page 10. 0454d 6 d SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL EAGANDALE COURT PROJECT NO. 456 Parcel Description EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK Sanitary Water Storm Sewer Main Sewer Street Lot 6, Block 4 $22,660 Lot 14, Block 4 --- EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 7 Lot 3, Block 1 --- Page 11. 0454d (0 / $13,133 $14,510 $17,673 $67,976 13,133 14,510 17,673 45,316 $13,133 $14,510 $17,673 $45,316 EAGANDA.LE COURT UTII-ITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY -SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA 70 BONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting, Engineers St. Pat+I, Minn. Date: Sept., 1985 P R O J. No. Comm. 49368 ji 456 Existi wore EAGANDA,LE COURT UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN EAGAN, MINNESOTA 7/ BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK if S ASSOCIATES, INC. 11 Conisuiting * Engineers St. Patti, Minn. ,s Date: Sept., 1985 pROJ. No. Comm. 49368 456 �) EAGANDA,LE COURT UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER - EAGAN, MINNESOTA m BONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANBERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting, Engineers St. PALM, Minn. Date: Sept., 1985 PROJ. No. Comm. 49368 11 456 EAGANDA.LE COURT UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS STREETS EAGAN, MINNESOTA Me BONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting* Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: Sept., 1985 PROJ. No. Comm. 49368 11 456 Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty PUBLIC HEARING/BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION E. Project 459, Public Hearing (Brittany 9th Addition - Streets & Utilities) -- In response to a petition submitted by the de- veloper, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report discussing the installation of streets and utilities to service the proposed Brittany 9th Addition. This report was completed and presented to the Council on September 17 with the public hearing being scheduled for October 1. Enclosed on pages� through Q3 is a copy of the feasibility report for the Cou cil.'s review arfd reference during this public hearing. All notices have been sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project informing them of this public hearing. In addition, a copy of the feasibility report has been forwarded to the developer for his review prior to the public hearing. Also on September 17, the Council received a petition and authorized the premature preparation of detailed plans and specifications based on the developer's guarantee of all costs should this project not be approved at the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 459 (Brittany 9th Addition - streets & utilities). 7� REPORT ,m BRITTANY 9th ADDITION UTILITY & STREET IiPROVEENTS CITY PROJECT No. 459 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1985 FILE No. 49371 e .? c" 94 Pa" Mi^v 75 2335 ?U 7 .4,,4.E 36 St. P-4 M--,.& 55113 /-).laws. 611- 636-4600 September 5, 1985 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55121 Re: Brittany 9th Addition Project 459 Our File No. 49371 Dear Mayor and Council: Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. Robert W. Rosene, P.E. Joseph C. Anderltk, P E. Brudlord.4. Lemberg, Rtchurd E. Turner, P.F. lames C. Olson, P.E. GlennR. Cook, P.E. Keith A. Gordan, P.l Thomas E. No."". P,L Richard W Foster, P L Robert G. Schantcht P E. Marvin L..Swvala, P.E Donald C. Burgordt, P.F. Jerry A. 5oardon. P Mark. .Hanson, P.E Ted K. /Meld, P.E. Michael T Ram;,. ,i. P L Ro5err R. PJe%jer.e. P F. David O Losko:a, P.E. ChariesA Encks,m Len ,N. Pawetikv Harlan AL Olson Transmitted herewith is our report for Brittany 9th Addition, Project 459. This report covers sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and street con— struction and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas E. Angus TEA:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by- me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. i�[��� Mark A. Hanson ate: September 5, 1985 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: Department /of Pu c Works Date: 9'/ct%s!5, 0548d 7� SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and. street to serve Brittany 9th Addition. Brittany 9th Addition contains 17 large single family lots. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plan for the City of Eagan. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer to serve Brittany 9th Addition includes an 8" diameter sanitary sewer in the street as shown on the attached drawing to properly serve the abutting lots. The sanitary sewer will connect to an ex- isting manhole located at the northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 2 Brittany 8th Addition. It is proposed to install the sanitary sewer to a depth of 30 feet in the street at the easterly end of the project. This depth is greater than re- quired to serve the lots in Brittany 9th Addition but will allow for the future extension of gravity sewer into Parcel 011-75. As a result, the north- erly part and a portion of the easterly part of Parcel 011-75 will have access to gravity sewer. The cost for the additional depth will be assessed equally against the lots in Brittany 9th Addition in exchange for an easement to in- stall a cul-de-sac on Parcel 011-75 at the east end of the project. Water Main: Water main to serve Brittany 9th Addition includes a 16 inch di- ameter trunk and a 6 inch diameter lateral water main. The 16 inch trunk water main will be constructed to the north end of Sherwood Way and will be a continuation of the existing 16 inch trunk water main located at the existing easterly end of Sherwood Way. It is proposed to construct a 6 inch water main in the east/west street and southerly within the cul-de-sac street as shown on the attached drawing. 0548d 7Page 1. Brittany 9th Addition is located in the high pressure zone. Static pres- sures will range from 65 to 85 psi and residual from 73 to 93 psi respective- ly. It is, therefore, recommended pressure reducing valves be provided as part of the building permit for certain homes to reduce the residual pressure below the recommended 85 psi. Services: Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed 15 feet beyond the right-of-way line. Service lines are proposed to be 4 inch diameter for sanitary sewer and 1 inch diameter for water. Storm Sewer: Storm sewer proposed herein includes catch basins located at the southerly end of the cul-de-sac as shown on the attached drawing. Storm sewer will discharge into Pond LP -7 located in Dakota County Park. It is antici- pated the outlet for Pond LP -7 will not be required until either Dakota County develops this portion of park or the water level in each pond reaches a flood- ing condition which could occur as additional areas tributary to these ponds develop. Building permits should be reviewed to insure basement elevations for buildings around the pond are a minimum of 941.7, which is two feet above the high water level of the pond. Street: Street construction proposed herein includes constructing streets in Brittany 9th Addition to a 32 foot width and a 7 ton residential design thick- ness. Bituminous surfacing and surmountable concrete curb and gutter is in- cluded in conjunction with restoration of the boulevard area. It is assumed grading of the street will be done by the developer. A cul-de-sac with a 45 foot paved radius is proposed to be constructed on Parcel 011-75 at the east end of the east/west street. This will allow for turn around of maintenance equipment along with other vehicles. A 5 foot wide gravel shoulder instead of concrete curb and gutter will be installed around the cul-de-sac and the street section will be the same as other streets in the Page2. 0548d 79, project. It is assumed the grading of the cul-de-sac will be done as part of this project. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: CONSTRUCTION AREA SE 1/4, SECTION 33 Brittany 7th Addn. - Outlot A (Brittany 9th Addn.) Parcel 011-75 (Jerry Thomas) ASSESSMENT AREA SE 1/4, SECTION 33 Brittany 7th Addn. - Outlot A COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: Sanitary Sewer $ 54,520 Water Main 41,350 Services 14,030 Storm Sewer 13,240 Street 76,000 TOTAL ..................... $199,140 The total estimated project cost is $199,140 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties in Brittany 9th Addition. A preliminary assessment roll is in- cluded at the back of this report in Appendix B. All assessments will be re- vised based on final costs. SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of the lateral sani- tary sewer equally against the 17 lots in Brittany 9th Addition. Trunk area sanitary sewer was previously assessed as part of Project No. 137. WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess the total cost of the lateral water main equally against the 17 lots in Brittany 9th Addition. These costs will in- clude a 6" equivalent cost for the 16" trunk water main. Costs associated with oversizing of the 16" water main are assumed to be trunk costs and will Pa 3. 0548d /�7 be the responsibility of the trunk fund. Trunk area water main for this area has not been assessed and is, therefore, proposed to be assessed as part of this project. SERVICES: It is proposed to assess the cost of services equally to the 17 lots in Brittany 9th Addition. STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral storm sewer equally to the 17 lots in Brittany 9th Addition. Trunk area storm sewer for this area has not been assessed and is, therefore, proposed to be assessed as part of this project. STREET: It is proposed to assess the total cost of street equally to the 17 lots in Brittany 9th Addition. TRUNK RATES: Trunk area rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: Trunk Water Main Oversize Agricultural (Single family) $1,190/Acre Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize Single family $0.048/sq.ft. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Proj. Cost Revenue Balance A.) SANITARY SEWER Lateral $ 54,520 Lateral Assessment $ 54,520 $ 54,520 $ 54,520 - 0 - Page 4. 0548d gb B.) WATER MAIN Lateral Trunk Lateral Assessment Trunk Area Assessment C.) SERVICES Lateral Lateral Assessment D.) STORM SEWER Lateral Lateral Assessment Trunk Area Assessment E.) STREET Lateral Lateral Assessment Proj. Cost Revenue $ 35,630 5,720 $ 41,350 $ 14,030 $ 14,030 $ 13,240 $ 13,240 $ 76,000 $ 35,630 8,818 $ 44,448 $ 14,030 $ 14,030 $ 13,240 15,493 $ 28,733 $ 76,000 $ 76,000 $ 76,000 TOTAL .................. The anticipated trunk fund balance is +$18,591. Page 5. 0548d Balance +$ 3,098 - 0 - +$15,493 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Pag e 6. 0548d <7� September 17, 1985 October 1, 1985 October 1, 1985 November 1, 1985 November 5, 1985 July, 1986 August, 1986 May, 1987 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION PROJECT NO. 459 A. SANITARY SEWER Lin.ft. 900 Lin.ft. 8" PVC sanitary sewer 0'-20' dp. in pl. @ $16.00/l.f. $ 21,440 300 Lin.ft. 8" PVC sanitary sewer 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $26.00/l.f. 7,800 7 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. in pl. @ $950.00/each 6,650 54 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 3,240 17 Each 8"x4" Wye in pl. @ $50.00/each 850 80 Lin.ft: 4" Serv. riser in pl. @ $10.00/lin.ft. 800 LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $2,000/L.S. 2,000 300 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 3,000 1,200 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,200 1,000 Total $ 39,940 Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. +5% Contingency 1,997 Total $ $ 41,937 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 12,583 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER .............................. $ 54,520 B. WATER MAIN 160 Lin.ft. 16" DIP water main in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 4,480 1,070 Lin.ft. 6" DIP water main in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft. 14,980 3 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000/each 3,000 1 Each 16" Butterfly valve& box @ $1,500/each 1,500 3 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $400.00/each 1,200 2,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.20/lb. 2,400 1 Each Connect 16" DIP to ex. 16" DIP @ $500.00/each 500 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 1,230 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,230 Total $ 30,290 +5% Contingencies 1,515 $ 31,805 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 9,545 TOTAL WATER MAIN ................................ $ 41,350 Page 7. 0548d 0 C. SERVECES 650 Lin.ft. 4" PVC sanitary sewer service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 3,900 780 Lin.ft. 1" type "K" water service @ $5.00/lin.ft. 3,900 17 Each 1" Corporation stop in pl. @ $20.00/each 340 17 Each 1" Curb stop and box @ $80.00/each 1,360 780 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 780 200 Lin.ft. Total $ 10,280 +5% Contingencies $ 515 +5% Contingencies $ 10,795 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest $ 3,235 TOTAL SERVICES ................................... $ 14,030 D. STORM SEWER 200 Lin.ft. 18" RCP storm sewer @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 5,600 1 Each Double CB w/cstg. @ $1,800.00/each 1,800 1 Each 18" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 800 6 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 300 LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $1,000.00/L.S. 1,000 200 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 200 Total $ 9,700 +5% Contingencies 485 $ 10,185 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 3,055 TOTALSTORM SEWER ................................. $ 13,240 Page 8. 0548d N E. STREET 2,000 Cu.yds. Grading of cul-de-sac @ $3.00/cu.yd. $ 6,000 500 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 1,500 300 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $4.00/cu.yd. 1,200 5,100 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $0.50/sq.yd. 2,550 1,840 Ton Class 5 100% crushed quarry rock @ $7.00/ton 12,880 410 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course in pl. @ $11.00/ton 4,510 410 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course in pl. @ $12.00/ton 43920 46 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $210.00/ton 9,660 220 Gal. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.40/gal.- 308 2,000 Lin.ft: Surmountable concrete curb & gutter @ $4.50/lin.ft. 9,000 5 Each Adjust MH frame @ $150.00/each 750 4 Each Adjust G.V. & Box @ $100.00/each 400 1 Each Permanent barricade @ $500.00/each 500 1.0 Acre Seed w/fertilizer & mulch @ $1,500.00/Ac. 1,500 Total $ 55,678 +5% Contingencies 2,782 $ 58,460 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 17,540 TOTAL STREET .................................... $ 76,000 vim; A. SANITARY SEWER $ 54,520 B. WATER MAIN 41,350 C. SERVICES 14,030 D. STORM SEWER 13,240 E. STREET 76,000 TOTAL .............. $199,140 Page 9. 0548d T5 A. SANITARY SEWER a.) Lateral Parcel Description BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION Block 1, Lot 1-6 Block 2, Lot 1-10 Block 3, Lot 1 Total B. WATER MAIN a.) Lateral APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION PROJECT NO. 459 No. of Lots Cost/Lot b �3,ZU/ 10 3,207 1 3,207 17 Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION Block 1, Lot 1-6 6 $2,096 Block 2, Lot 1-10 10 2,096 Block 3, Lot 1 1 2,096 Total 17 b.) Trunk Area (7.41 acres x $1,190/acre = $8,818) BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION Block 1, Lot 1-6 6 $ 519 Block 2, Lot 1-10 10 519 Block 3, Lot 1 1 519 17 C. SERVICES Parcel Description BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION Block 1, Lot 1-6 Block 2, Lot 1-10 Block 3, Lot 1 Total 0548d No. of Lots b 10 1 17 Page 10. f6 Cost/Lot $ 825 825 825 Total Assessment $ 19,242 32,071 3.207 $ 54,520 Total 20,959 2,096 $ 35,630 $ 3,112 5,187 519 $ 8,818 Total 4,y�L 8,253 825 $ 14,030 D. STORM SEWER Page 11. 0548d V Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment a.) Lateral BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION Block 1, Lot 1-6 6 $ 779 $ 4,671 Block 2, Lot 1-16 10 779 7,790 Block 3, Lot 1 1 779 779 Total 17 $ 13,240 b.) Trunk Area (322,773 sq.ft. x $0.048/sq.ft. - $15,493) BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION Block 1, Lot 1-6 6 $ 911 $ 5,468 Block 2, Lot 1-10 10 911 9,114 Block 3, Lot 1 1 911 911 Total 17 $ 15,493 E. STREET BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION Block 1, Lot 1-6 6 $4,470 $ 26,824 Block 2, Lot 1-10 10 4,470 44,706 Block 3, Lot 1 1 4,470 4,470 Total 17 $ 76,000 Page 11. 0548d V a a 0 C4 z -4 0 H H 0 z H ON W H !n � A � >4d ce W cn a H z H O 0 H ti � � o N N cv H H P+ H H OC .] PQ W a P+ U N -4 Q) w m P-1 -4 m o 0 0 ro m 00 00 00 41 v 0 o m N N cv H 6 V�- U n n n 1�-1 U) ur ca C) v J V? Q) HI rz p 0 a ON a " CO r` Cf) �4 1` r - Q L to U N N N •rl 70 00 JO >4 a yr O G U1 U1 U1 R+ G N L N 3 _ � cc 10 �o H++ a a ON N� O O O 4J cd N N N �lCA- ctl H O O 0 J 1 N Cli N N ) � cn 0 H H O A .� A I � H r-1 '4 x L 4-) 4-1 H o 0 0 o ON -4 ,J r •r� U UHI U U U P. A PQ ] PQ PC, W N -4 Q) w m P-1 011-76 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 NtiV 789 Z 2 10 p:� 2 _ 6 I� b = 5 / 1 � 4 I PON D LP -7 0' �-- - - O�ty-�`! PARK D AKO� A C BRITTANY 9th ADDITION UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROPOSED 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER 011-75 N Scale I"= 200 (D BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting- Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: Sept, 1985 P R O J. No. Comm. 49371 IF 459 f 4� IIi fl � NTY PARK OAKG-cA°U Ii �i BRITTANY 9th ADDITION BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. it UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS Consulting, Engineers WATER MAIN St. Paul, Minn. i EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: Sepl, 1985 PROD. NO. Comm. 49371 Ir 459 011-76 -PROPOSED 16 D.I.P. 3 1 ! Ex. 16" DIP A. S� 1 2 3 4 5 6 � _ ---- � R0 OSED �� DIP 011-75 1 Z 2 a 9 10 �0 2 N 6 Z 0 3 5 / � 4 / F POND Scale I"= 200 8fh LP -7 f 4� IIi fl � NTY PARK OAKG-cA°U Ii �i BRITTANY 9th ADDITION BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. it UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS Consulting, Engineers WATER MAIN St. Paul, Minn. i EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: Sepl, 1985 PROD. NO. Comm. 49371 Ir 459 f 011-76 3 I I 2 3 4 5 6 I 7 8 z 2 9 10 O 6 2 Z 3 � C) = 5 / � 4 / POND F 8fh LP -7 NWL 932.2 qA H.W.L. 939.7 /n. �-- — — G Ou�yTY pp"RK p AKpT A BRITTANY 9th ADDITION UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA 011-75 N PROPOSED STORM SEWER Scole I"= 200 BONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting* Engineers St. PALII, Minn. Date: Sept, 1985 P R O J. No. Comm. 49371 459 011-76 3 1 A I O O � Ex. Street I i Z 2 i 1O I -•_I 3 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 10 6 2 5 4 1 I PON D 8fh LP -7 O/v — — /* JL c::D p AKp� A GO PROPOSED STREETS 011-75 N Scale I"= 200 BRITTANY 9th ADDITION BONESTROO, RO5ENE..ANDERLlK !� ASSOCIATES. INC. �I UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS Conaultinq Engineers St. Paul. Minn. STREET IMPROVEMENTS Date: sept, 19s5 PNO.�—�i EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49371 4 5 9� Agenda Information Memo October 1,_1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-one POSITION PAPER FOR 24-HOUR EMERGENCY CARE FACILITY A. Consideration of Position Paper for 24 -Hour Emergency Care Facility --The Economic Development Master Plan that was adopted as a part of the Star City presentation in 1984 contains as one of its major objectives a 24-hour emergency care facility. The Economic Development Commission has recognized the need to begin working toward this objective and through the cooperation of the Chamber of Commerce, a subcommittee was appointed and chaired by Dick Stevenson, who is also a member of the Economic Development Commission to further pursue the achievability of a 24-hour emergency care center. There are seven members along with the City Administrator who serve on this committee. The committee met several times during the suummer and a position paper was drafted by the City Administrator's office for review and consideration by the committee. The committee provided a few revisions and has recommended the same to the Dakota Chamber of Commerce which in action at their most recent Board meeting held on September 26, 1985, adopted the position paper. The Economic Development Commission has also reviewed the 24-hour emergency care center position paper and is in agreement with its objectives. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the position paper as presented by the Dak to Chamber and Economic Development Commission. The City Administrator will provide a brief explanation and some comments regarding a 24-hour emergency care center at the City Council meeting on Tuesday. This economic development objective in the master plan was regarded as one of the most important objectives to be implemented within a one to two year period of time. If the position paper is approved, with or without modification, copies will be mailed to several of the large health care providers within the metropolitan area. The City of Eagan, in conjunction with the Chamber of Commerce, is hopeful that at least one health care provider will be attracted to our community and provide the type of facility that is desired by the committees. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the position paper concerning health care facilities anchored by a 24-hour emergency care center as presented with or without modification. ��Z 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 September 4, 1985 DICK STEVENSON, SUBCOMMITTEE CHAIRMAN LOU CLARK, COMMITTEE MEMBER ROGER SJOBECK, COMMITTEE MEMBER PASTOR JIM BORGSCHATZ, COMMITTEE MEMBER ED'DUNN, COMMITTEE MEMBER DAVE KLEIMOLA, COMMITTEE MEMBER BOB PETERSON, COMMITTEE MEMBER BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Re: Revised Draft for Position Paper Concerning Health Care Facilities Anchored by a 24 -Hour Emergency Care Center Attached is a revised .draft of the City of Eagan position paper concerning health care facilities anchored by a 24-hour emergency care center. The revisions were made by our Administrative Assis- tant Jon Hohenstein and hopefully address the changes that were discussed at the last subcommittee meeting. Please review the draft and if you have any recommendations or changes, contact Chairman Stevenson at 452-9200 or this office by asking for either Jon Hohenstein or myself. Once the position paper receives consensus by the subcommittee, Chairman Stevensonwillpresent a draft to the Eagan Chamber Board for their consideration. The position paper will also be reviewed by the Economic Development Commission and eventually by the City Council for their review and adoption. Hopefully, the position paper can be reviewed and adopted by all these groups during the month of September for the final review and consideration by the City Council on October 1. I am planning to contact fellow committee member Bob Peterson and we will arrange for a meeting with Jon Hohenstein present to discuss a position paper for senior housing. Again, if you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office at any time. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator /Vl� cc: Jon Hohenstein, Administrative Assistant THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY A DRAFT CITY OF EAGAN POSITION PAPER CONCERNING HEALTH CARE FACILITIES ANCHORED BY A 24-HOUR EMERGENCY CARE CENTER -"Introduction The City of Eagan, through its City Council, Economic Development Commission and Chamber of Commerce, has chosen to pursue the development of a comprehensive means of meeting health care needs in and around the community. The City desires proposals which would focus on a 24 -h -our emergency care center in a campus arrangement with sufficient area to allow expansion of peripheral health and housing alternatives within a single overall scheme. The nature of the community, its needs, and the character istices of the preferred health care development are described below. City of Eagan Eagan is the single fastest growing community in Minnesota. Its broad spectrum of residential, commercial and industrial growth has been spurred by the substantial improvement of three major traffic corridors since 1980. This improved access has allowed the City to take advantage of its proximity to both metropolitan downtowns and has further enhanced its excellent development climate. Eagan has grown from 20,700 people in 1980 to more than 33,000 today. This level of growth is not expected to dissipate in the near future and it places a great responsibility on the City to provide for the rapidly expanding needs of its citizens. Apart from the more obvious needs of public works, police and fire protection and the like, there exists a wide variety of service needs which the City can only meet by encouraging private sector development. One such need lies in the area of emergency health care and long- term health care. The City of Eagan sees these needs being met concurrently through the development of a campus setting to include 24-hour emergency care, peripheral health care development and senior housing thus providing for numerous health and personal services. Campus -Concept The health and senior care campus concept is intended to focus on a 24-hour Emergency Care Center. Eagan currently is without a facility to treat life or function threatening conditions within its boundaries and its dramatic growth has heightened the need to have this capability apart from the metropolitan hospital locations. It would be essential for the center to have an ambulance service as an integral component of its operations. 9� 04 24-HOUR EMERGENCY CARE CENTER August 20, 1985 The campus concept must include sufficient area for expansion to accommodate the development of peripheral medical care facilities such as offices for physicians, specialists and therapists. It must also provide for or take into account senior housing development within reasonable proximity of the medical facilities. As Eagan has the rare opportunity to anticipate these developments simultaneously, there exists a strong desire to locate them so as to provide a rational spatial relationship between the functions. Pro-Qosed Reauirements The general requirements for the emergency care center campus concept are detailed below. In general, proposals should acknowledge and address the community needs for four functions located in five campus zones. These needs imply that a major hospital in the metropolitan area must act as the key development agent in any development of this kind. Only in this way can the various functions be addressed comprehensively and successfully. 1. 24 -Hour Emergency Care Center (1 campus zone) This zone shall provide two of the above-mentioned functions: a) Emergency care center and b) Integral ambulance service. a. Emergency Care Center As regards the former, all proposals to be given consideration must at a minimum meet the Minnesota Department of Health's proposed licensing rules for Freestanding Emergency Centers. A draft copy of these rules is attached. Even if these rules should change substantially before their implementation, the City would most favor proposals which best assure Eagan residents of quality, 24-hour emergency medical care by a licensed physician and trained staff with adequate facilities for such care. The City's interest in a facility so defined is based upon several assumptions. First, a 24-hour facility can best meet the needs of round-the-clock industrial employers with multiple and off -hour shifts. As employment within the community exceeds 12,000 persons and will expand substantially in the near term, the need for 24-hour availability is essential. Second, the need for both industrial users and community residents to be covered by medical insurance providers means that only a licensed 24- hour facility obligated to honor medical insurance is acceptable. Since health care under insurance has become a common practice, it is incongruous for the City to accept a 9 2 24-HOUR EMERGENCY CARE Augsut 20, 1985 facility not so obligated. Third, the City of Eagan lies at a strategic intersection of three links in the metropolitan thoroughfare system. A 24-hour emergency care center so located can best transport clients to a variety of major metropolitan hospitals as individual needs require. Finally, a 24-hour facility will encourage the development of habits of use. In emergency situations, it is essential that the most obvious health care provider be open and avilable. The City does not intend to encourage a facility which may not be open when a life threatening situation brings a citizen to it. b. Integral Ambulance Service The second function which must relate to this zone is the integral involvement of an ambulance service which meets the Minnesota Code of Agency Rules definition for "full transportation" in the Emergency Care Center's operations. This service must qualify for and be licensed under the Agency Rules for such services as attached. The service need not be located within the campus physically, but ought to act in such a manner as to lend continuity between personal and emergency transportation to the emergency medical provider. The City sees this requirement as a means to lower overhead costs through a rational integration of functions. Moreover, it would tend to encourage the campus development by making the center the most likely care provider in life threatening situations. This component raises the need for prompt action to begin the ambulance service licensing process. As this process is time consuming, an early initiation of the process will ensure that the Emergency Care Center is adequately serviced when it begins operations. 2. Peripheral Office and Specialist Space (1 zone) A second zone covers the third function which is to provide expansion space within the campus concept for the kinds of physician, specialist and therapist space which can be expected to gravitate toward the Emergency Care Center. The City prefers proposals which indicate an active role in such development as this tends to reinforce the campus concept and the integration of a variety of health care services. Again, the development of habits and use patterns relative to the campus is important to the City and diversity within these parameters is likely to encourage it. 3. Senior and Disadvantaged Housing and Care (3 zones) The final three zones are intended to cover the fourth function, the provision of senior housing, housing for the disadvantaged and extended personal care facilities within reasonable proximity of the Emergency Care Center. The three 1 .7 3 24 -EMERGENCY CARE CETNER August 20, 1985 zones are meant to correspond with the thee generally recognized age/activity cohorts or market segments which comprise these housing needs: a) Go-Go's, b) Slow-Go's, and c) No-Go's. The City recognizes that each of these groups has a heightened interest in security, personal assistance and health care in ever-increasing degrees. It is the City's intent to encourage the provision for such needs as part of the comprehensive campus concept. While on-site alternatives are not essential, carefully developed plans for proximate housing locations in which transportation needs are adequately addressed should be a part of any proposal. Details of Eagan's needs in this regard are outlined in the City of Eagan Position Paper concerning Housing for Seniors and the Disadvantaged. Summary The 'City of Eagan therefore invites interested parties to address the needs and concerns of the City through proposals for campuses which include: 1. 24-hour Emergency Care Center, 2. Ambulance service integral to Center operations, 3. Expansion area for peripheral medical office development, and 4. Senior and disadvantaged housing alternatives sensitive to the three basic senior age/activity cohorts. The development of such proposals will be assisted by Eagan City Staff and the Emergency Care Facility Search Committee. The community sees a substantial need to pursue this concept and appreciates the interest of major health care providers in the Eagan area. JH/jj I Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-two RESOLUTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF PROPERTY TAXES B. Resolution for Certification of Property Taxes Payable in 1986 - A resolution for certification of property taxes payable in 1986 has been prepared by Director of Finance/City Clerk for submission to Dakota County. Each year certification of property taxes payable in the next calendar year is required by municipalities in the State of Minnesota prior to October 15. For a copy of the mill rate that has been discussed at several budget workshop sessions and a public hearing that was held on September 17, 1985, refer to page /" . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny resolution for certification of property taxes payable in 1986 as presented. IN 41-, r 1 Rf m ri m •F� N L- U1 N l` O1 = Obi O W W Od N O U\ O � � 01 O CD NM et r r•I O kD r I� M n r t0 rH N O O r N N v N O N co O N O N +3 I I 14 U � O N N m r O • M N c N Cd � V 4-1 N (1) rcli L` O � V- N am M ti 0 14P CY o � N N N n O P4 M %0 N ON N O Pn O O r -i OON N � N �9 r d n 0 co 4-4 $4 N P. r -i 4) •r4 r -i El r r-1 r �q H W m c J., rOi 01 N 4-') O •ri E3 49 43 CO U 00 co P4 Il -r4 roa a w H b oA r+ 1 m 0 pq �r-I m co 41-, 1 Rf m n N m e0 N L- U1 N l` O1 = Obi O N Od N O U\ r M d U1 r O CD NM t+1 O r•I 19t kD r I� r n r t0 rH N r r N v N N v N O 41-, 1 Rf m n N N r co (� �i � Obi O O O N � U\ r M d U1 r t+1 O r•I 19t kD r co r n r t0 rH N r r N v N N v N O I I O O N N m r O I r 0 44 O V- N d' M ti I CY o � N N N n O L�1 M %0 N ON N O Pn l� I O to OON N � N �9 dT" n r•I Ul n M N r c0 m OP w O r O1 r � U\ r M d U1 r Ll- O r r O W r -I d ch N t0 r N r r N v N O 0 44 O V- N d' M ti � CY o O to OON N � N �9 dT" n N r �q m as roa w b oA A P 1 m 0 pq �r-I ri co di Nr -4 $4 -H ;4 pq Cd Lz it a -P ani a1i a 4-) ani rd ca •1 vi � .,I 10 00EDto imO cc oW MWa A 8 cn a H a Baa Agenda Information Memo October 1,.1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-three PUBLIC HEARING/FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER PROGRAM C. Consider Resolution to Set Public Hearing on a Program Document and Policy Statement for Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority First -Time Home Buyer Program - The Dakota County -HRA is proposing to submit an application for a ten million dollar bonding authorization for a First -Time Home Buyer Program. It would be necessary for the City of Eagan to submit the application through the Dakota County HRA by January 2, 1986, to receive consideration by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. This program would be sufficient to fund mortgages for about 130 homes, assuming an average purchase price of $75,000. This program is similar to two (2) different programs that were adopted by the City of Eagan to provide lower interest rates for, first-time homeowners. This program helps to stimulate first- time home buyers fo homeowner -occupied units. Enclosed on pages 14Y through /D is a copy of a letter from Mr. Mark Ulf ers, Deputy Executive Director of 'the HRA, explaining the program and the attachment. If the City,Council has a desire to proceed with further consideration of the program, it would be necessary to adopt a resolution setting a public hearing on a program document and a policy statement; and at that time the program would either be approved or denied. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM; To approve or deny a resolution that sets a public hearing on a program document and policy statement to be held November 19, 1985. DAKOTA COUNTY DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT 'r�� M i' 1.. la y� 'R.al '.�•�. HRA AUTHORITY ■ '; MM 2496 - 145th STREET WEST n ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4800 Serving People and Communities Sept ber 11, 1985 Tom Hedges, City Administrator City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Tom: We would like to request permission from the City of Eagan to submit an application for a $10,000,000 bonding authorization for a First -Time Homebuyer Program. Applications must be submitted by January 2nd to MHFA in order to receive consideration for 1986. A $10,000,000 bond issue (this is the maximum amount that can be requested) would be suf- ficient to fund mortgages for about 130 homes, assuming an average purchase price of $75,000. The attachment labeled Appendix A has information on current state and federal program requirements and Appendix B contains a proposed time schedule that we would need to follow to meet the January 2nd application deadline. There will be a total of $27,000,000 available to allocate state wide which should fund three to four applications. Applications will be selected via a lottery method by the end of January 1986. Current state law allows for a lottery (community names are picked out of a hat) for allocating this type of Bonding Authority. The two Eagan council actions that would be required would be as follows: (1) Consider a resolution setting a public hearing on a "Program Document" and a "Policy Statement" (a new federal requirement). (2) Hold a public hearing and consider approval of the program and Policy Statement. No additional actions would be required. The program requirements in Appendix A only reflect state and federal requirements and could be made more restrictive if the city desired, e.g. the purchase limit could be reduced. All available bond proceeds from- the 1983 issue in Eagan have long since been used and the demand for affordable financing is still quite strong. If you would like us to move forward on preparing the required applications and program document, please contact me and we will begin immediately. Pe 1 urs, Mark Ulf Deputy Executive Director Attachments -- A 1.1 Cr'%I I A I r)DDr10T11 AIITV CILADI r1VCR11 APPENDIX A 1. Size of Bond Issue: Maximum $10,000,000 (resulting in $9,500,000 in mortgage loans). 2. Use of Proceeds: A. Proceeds can be made available to persons purchasing existing homes in the City of Eagan or to developers for persons purchasing new construction housing units from the developers in the City. B. No mobile homes may be financed under the program. 3. Type of Mortgage Loans: A. FHA, VA and Conventional. B. 100% private mortgage insurance is required when the loan to value ratio exceeds 75%. 4. Mortgage Loan Interest Rate: Interest rate for mortgage loans to be determined based upon conditions at the time of issuance of bonds. (Under present conditions, interest rate would be approximately 10.50%). 5. Bond Sale Date: Bonds must be issued during calendar year 1986. 6. Program Income Limitations: A. 100% of the mortgage loans will probably have to be reserved for six months for individuals and families with incomes less than 80% of the maximum program income permitted by the Minnesota Housing Bond Act (currently, $28,864 adjusted gross income). B. After the first six months, the maximum income will be 100% of maximum permitted by the Act (currently, $36,080 adjusted gross income). 7. Summary of Adjusted Gross Income and Maximum Purchase Price: Max Adjusted Max Gross Income Gross Income (Family of Four) First Six Months: $28,864 $31,364 After Six Months: $36,080 $38,580 (General Program) Max Purchase Prices $108,240 $108,240 Gross Income is reduced by $750 for each adult (maximum of two adults) and $500 for each dependent to arrive at adjusted gross income. For a family of four (two adults and two children), the reduction would be $2,500. 103 APPENDIX B Time Schedules (1) October 15, 1985. City Council approves resolution setting public hearing on Program and Policy Statement. (2) October 21, 1985. Public hearing notice is published in newspaper. (3) November 19, 1985. Public hearing held on Program and Policy Statement. (4) January 2, 1985. Application submitted to MHFA. (5) January 16, 1985. Lottery held by MHFA. (6) April - May 1, 1986. Bond sold and funds available for first-time buyers. /D4 Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-four REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SUNSET 10TH ADDITION D. Rezoning from A to.R1 and Preliminary Plat for Sunset 10th Addition Consisting of,4 Single -Family Lots and one Church Lot - A public hearing was held at the August 27 and September 24 APC meetings to consider applications for both rezoning and preliminary plat approval of the Sunset 10th Addition. This plat consists of four single-family lots to be rezoned R1 and one church lot to be rezoned PF on ten acres of land south of Diffley and Dodd Roads. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For additional information on the item refer to the staff report, copies enclosed on pages through 117/. For additional information on action that was taken by the APC refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s) //_3 through _. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny (1) The rezoning from A to Rl and (2) The preliminary plat for Sunset 10th Addition. 10,5 .,b -CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: RANDY BARROWS, SUNSET 10TH ADDITION LOCATION: NW4, SECTION 25 EXISTING ZONING: 'A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 27, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 20, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for rezoning and preliminary plat approval for the Sunset 10th Addition. This plat consists of 4 s . f . lots to be rezoned R-1 and one church lot to be rezoned P.F. (public facility) on 10 acres of land south of Diffley and Dodd Roads. ZONING AND LAND USE: R-1 districts border' the site on 2.sides with Sunset Additions on the west and along the south with the Saddle Horn Addition. The property to the east is owned by the Missouri Synod Lutheran Church. North of Diffley Road is zoned A (agricultural). The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site R-1. The pond elevation of 906 is the lowest point on the site with all areas draining toward it. The western hillside is the steepest with a slope of more than 200. A ravine separates this area from the more gradual slope from the east. South of the ravine, where the .future parking is designated, the soil is of questionable .building suitability and the proposed use appears appropriate. All existing drainage flows from the pond north under Diffley Rd. Existing woods cover almost all of the western 'hillside ( lots 1 and 2). SITE PLANNING: Access to phase l would be from Diffley Rd. at the lowest possible point to allow for maximum vehicle -visibility. Additional access may occur from Stirrup St.. after the future parking lot is installed. t A road easement connects the proposed Augusta Lane cul-de-sac and Lutheran Church to the east and north -.of lot 3. The Sunset 7th Addition has been previously platted and at this time nothing has been built on these 2 lots. The applicant wishes to replat lot 1 from the existing 110' to 100' along Yorktown Place to allow more building flexibility in the -now proposed §corner lot .(lot 2). Lots 1 and 2 of the Sunset 10th Ad. are rather large, approximately 1.3 and .75 acres respectively. r •,r'Ya, , I/D SUNSET 10TH ADDITION AUGUST 27, 1985 PAGE 2 r - The minimum frontage on the cul-de-sac is rather small. Lots 3 and 4 are more representative of the surrounding R-1 districts. The parks dedication has been fulfilled as part of the Lexington South P. D. An 8' trail on the south side of Diffley Rd. would be required by the Park and Rec Dept. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading plan as proposed with this develop- ment has two major problems. The first being Lot 2 is inaccessible due to steep grades from the cul-de-sac. Second is that in order to provide sanitary sewer service to the church site, fill will be required over the sanitary sewer extension. The drainage all drains into a low depression located next to Co. Rd. 30 just east of proposed Lot 1. From here the storm water runoff is conveyed under Co. Rd. 30 by a culvert to a future City ponding area, JP -27, as shown on figure 1. This pond presently has no outlet. Staff is not aware of any flooding problem to date, however, Staff will begin monitoring this pond if the proposed development is approved. Staff will require that the drainage from the cul-de-sac be conveyed to the proposed pond by storm sewer pipe. This development will require placement of a culvert across the grading required to provide cover over the sanitary sewer line because this grading will block existing drainage patterns. WATERMAIN: An existing 20" watermain is in place along the south side of Co. Rd. 30. 6" watermain are located within the inter- section of Augusta La & Yorktown P1 and also at the dead end of Stirrup St. Staff recommends the extension of the 6" watermain from the Augusta La and Yorktown P1 intersection north, then east along the proposed road easement to connect to the extension of Stirrup St watermain. SANITARY SEWER: There are three possible alternatives to provide service to this proposed development and are outlined as follows: Alternative 1 - Extend the sanitary sewer from Yorktown P1 & Augusta La intersection north to the end of the cul-de-sac. Then extend a line to the east to provide service to the church site. .This alternative will require filling the ravine to provide a minimum of 6' of cover over the pipe. It also would provide service to an elevation of 923 for Lot 1, & 920 for Lots 3 & 4. Elevation necessary to service the church would be very close. Alternative 2 Extend the sanitary sewer in Stirrup St north to the proposed road easement, then west to the cul-de-sac, then south to service Lots 3 & 4. This alternative provides 107 S SUNSET 10TH ADDITION AUGUST 27, 1985 PAGE 3 r approx. 3h' -more depth than alternate 1. Still it would be necessary to fill over the ravine for the installation of sanitary sewer and also"to' fill somewhat off the end of Stirrup St to provide adequate cover for the sanitary sewer. Alternative 3 -The sanitary sewer from Augusta La & Yorktown P1 could be extended north to the end of the cul-de-sac and the sanitary sewer from Stirrup St could be extended north to provide service to the church site. The east -west line need not be constructed under this alternative. It will still require fill over the extension from Stirrup St. STREETS: Co. Rd. 30 (Diffley Rd) borders this development along the north. Co. Rd. 30 is a two lane, rural roadway under the jurisdiction of Dak. County Hwy Dept. Subsequently, this develop- ment will require Dak. Co. Hwy Dept. to grant a right of access on this stretch. Yorktown P1 & Augusta La intersection provide access to the SW corner of this development and Stirrup St dead ends into Lot 5 of this development. These streets are under the jurisdiction of the City and are built to City residential street classifications. This development proposes to extend Augusta La as a cul-de-sac to provide direct access to Lots 1 - 4. The cul-de-sac is within all City Code requirements. This differs from the previous plan Council & Commission reviewed and approved. As you will recall, the previous plan provided. for a street from the Yorktown P1 & Augusta La intersection easterly to connect to Dodd Rd. Because this development does not propose to develop on Lot 5, south of the Lutheran Church site, Staff feels extending the cul-de-sac easterly to the church site is inappropriate at this time. . If the church would decide to subdivide the area of Lot 5,,south of the Lutheran Church site, in the future, the City can then require the installation of the easterly street extension from the cul-de-sac. It would be appropriate to construct a turn -around for Stirrup St because it does not appear likely that the extension of Stirrup St northerly will ever occur. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: A'60' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Co. Rd. 30. The 30' half right-of-way proposed by the developer complies with City requirements for a cul-de-sac street. Staff recommends a 60' radius be dedicated for the turn -around on Stirrup St. Staff will require easements over the sanitary sewer and .the watermain looping. The minimum width shall be 30' where the watermain and sewer are parallel and 20' only one exists. Staff also recommends the dedication of a 20' utility easement for storm sewer from the 'cul-de-sac to the pond and a drainage easement across Lot 5 as necessary to insure future drainage. n t SUNSET 10TH ADDITION " AUGUST 27, 1985 PAGE 4 ASSESSMENTS: A check- .of our assessment records indicate this development is still responsible for trunk area storm sewer assess- ments. The estimated assessment for trunk area storm sewer, based on 1985 residential rates, amounts to $18,400.00. This results from using an estimated 8.8 net acres at $0.048/S.F. The actual amount of the assessment due at the time of final platting will be based upon the rates in effect at the time of final platting and the final plat areas less public right-of-way and ponding easements. All remaining costs for this development will be the sole responsi- bility of this development. CONDITIONS: 1) The church lot must meet all applicable public facilities ordinances. 2) All standard plat conditions shall be required. 3) Lot 2 shall be graded to provide for no greater than a 10% slope on the driveway. Adequate cover shall be placed over the sanitary sewer line extensions. d 4) The watermain shall be looped from Augusta La to Stirrup St. 5) A turn -around shall be constructed to City standards for Stirrup St. 6) A 60' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Co. Rd. 30, a 30' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for the cul-de-sac street & a 60' radius shall be dedicated for the turn -around. 7) A 30' utility easement shall be dedicated where -the sanitary and watermain run parallel. A 20' utility easement shall be dedicated where only watermain runs, and a 20' utility easement shall be dedicated for a storm sewer line draining the cul-de-sac to the pond. 8) This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rate in effect at the time of final platting. 9) All costs associated with public improvements within this development will be the sole responsibility of this development. 10) All standard engineering conditions which apply shall be adhered to. i�9 O'LEARY PARK --46 x— -.E c-3;1 61 FlPr cE.r ACV a Comm Room -al, 1.1;pA.4y a EAGAN brukicIPAL WINDcRFsr —'A RK BERRY PACW PARK 5! CEAA_— Ilk! SfE fFn LAItr 4kj'A E, PQM.=As. PA OAK CJjg:� ILAj I -W —tl 74 it �PARKVIEW F,.IOW GOLF V COURSE CARRIAGI�' NN, ^URSE -E-�Ay WESWrT BILE .1 sout. b ROAD a PARK 1K EACAN (3. I*E d. '�UAR'US - LS rAW 6UFF GOAT HILL xIl _R3 PARK W111111 I'LL Pd RK SCHWANZ LAKE PARKI �.D IRII;4 ISCUTi ll PIV LAKE 155 ' CUE OAK POND M mp aurwiN //0 T F3-t'�. _.�,nt"�. -`k;-.r�.t�'z�-d''%:�.!� � �-0. "ir::. J�i:�J'1 �4+e•OY,.e:'f'-. ice►-"l•?s. i �� � - - � - '�YY • • � .' � .' �. ' -e:�.-�`-. y' -1 ,. _`►• •.. l.i-- - �.-<..-7'�![_•f•-.•i'"..s•--!•.�1.{w::.T._... •`r•�cs�i•.j4trti.r-.��' -'r LTi �xek' `-`' '' �`::'i-,_•i. ':.?l:y - � � �� �:�•,\, � —� � it -. / /. ��_ -- ,Q I .21 W — M AUGUSTA LANE "'t -.,•I.. .., ��1�� j/ i... - - `� I I I Ll o s�.T ---�i rt1 0 ism v CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH DIFFLEY ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA KRECH, O BR1EN d WASS, INC. ARC141iCT1 - DfGaEERRf Nrr cua••w ..+v.�• ' wv ry»• Ksrr•, �•tWT• wto 0, C4 SUNSET 10TH G-10 J-72 J-37 J-34 j- 15 �Q�ARE J-35 J-32 J-54 J-33 -40 J - 36 Jr - /-.' A, - _kell -48 R, J-38 J J-46\ 4J 419 --j-55 T- - -4 �4-44 X., -... j- �o 0 .65. -J--56/ /\J-5 f J-4 5 J -52- ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL ................ city of eagan PUBLIC STORM SEWER WORKS DEPARTMENT I MASTER PLAN FIG. * 1 approved: standard I plate #: APC Minutes September 24, 1985 SUNSET 10TH ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of Randy Barrows for rezoning to R-1 and Public Facility for a church and single family purposes on 10 acres of land, south of Diffley Road and Dodd Road, and for preliminary plat approval of Sunset 10th Addition, was convened by the Chairman. Dale Runkle was asked to detail the application and he described several alternates for road access, primarily to Diffley Road. He indicated that a meeting had been held with Dakota County Plat Commission and the proposed access to Diffley now appeared to be determined. Randy Barrows was present and there were no objections. A question arose as to where it would be most appropriate for the access location to Diffley Road and also questions about access to the east to Dodd Road. Mr. Runkle mentioned that the distance involved and also soil conditions did not make it appear appropriate at the present time to provide access east to Dodd Road. Further, there were questions about the cul-de-sac to the single family homes within the plat and member Wilkins was concerned about the problem of traffic from two churches that would be exiting to Diffley Road and Dodd Road at the same time on Sundays. She recommended there be no access through the residential area from the churches. It was recommended by the staff, however, that the decision be made in the future as to access to the cul-de-sac and through the residential area. McCrea moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend approval for rezoning to R-1 and Public Facilities. All voted in favor except. Wilkins who voted no. McCrea then moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application for preliminary plat, subject to the following recommendations: 1. The church lot shall meet all applicable public facilities ordinances. 2. All standard plat conditions shall be imposed. 3. Lot 2 shall be graded to provide no greater than a 10% slope on the driveway. Adequate cover shall be placed over the sanitary sewer line extensions. 4. The watermain shall be looped from Augusta Lane to Stirrup Street. 5. A turn -around shall be constructed to City standards for Stirrup St. 6. A 60 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Co. Road 30, a 30 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for the cul-de-sac street and a 6 - foot radius shall be dedicated for the turn -around. 7. A 30 foot utility easement shall be dedicated where the sanitary sewer line and watermain run parallel. A 20 foot utility easement shall be dedicated where only watermain runs, and a 20 foot utility easement shall be dedicated for a storm sewer line draining the cul-de-sac to the pond. 8. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rate in effect at the time of final platting. 3 APC Minutes September 24, 1985 9. All costs associated with public improvements within this development shall be the sole responsibility -of this. development. 10. All standard engineering conditions which apply shall be adhered to. 11. The Dakota County Plat Commission recommendation concerning lighting at the intersection with Diffley Road shall be provided. Those in favor were Hall, Wold, McCrea, Bohne and Trygg; those against were Wilkins and Harrison. ROBERT SCHLANGEN - AMOCO STATION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A public hearing on the application of Robert Schlangen for conditional use permit for a pylon sign located southeast of the intersection of Slaters Road..and Cliff Road, at the proposed Amoco Station was next convened by the Chairman. The location would be on Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Cliff 3rd Addition and Dale `-Runkle explained the proposed sign location, including its relation to the Cedar Avenue Freeway. The proposed signage would be reduced to two 6 foot by 10 foot signs with one on the ground and one on the pylon. The proposal was for a 28 foot pole plus 6 feet for -the sign which would require an overall 15 foot variance. Representatives rom Northstar Engineering were present, as was Mr. Schlangen. Member McCrea objected to the variance, noting that the reason for the variance does not appear to be valid in the present situation. It was also indicated that the Amoc6 station was aware of the freeway setting when it chose to locate at that site. The bo'e of the sign would be 7 feet below the street and it did not appear that/it would be advisable to allow the extreme variance for site distance pu posAs. Harrison moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend denial of t e:application for reasons including the foregoing, and the following: 1. That there were inadequate variance requested. Those in favor were Harrison Wold, Wilkins and Trygg. , askns submitted by the applicant for the Bohne Ind McCrea; those against were Hall, Wold then moved, McCrea seconded the moeion to approve the application for conditional use permit f r pylon sig subject to the following recommendations: 1. That the price sign will include 30 square feet, with the oval sign 60 square feet, for a total of 190 square feet. 2. The pylon sign shall not be located within 300 feet of any other pylon sign measured on the same side of the street. 3. The pylon sign shall not project more than 27 feet above the center line of Cliff Road. 4. The pylon sign shall not exceed 90 square feet of signage per side. 14- 4 Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-five CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PYLON SIGN AT AMOCO STATION E. Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Pylon Sign for an Amoco Gas Station on Lot 1, :Block 1, Oak Cliff 3rd Addition — A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their regular meetings held on August 27 and later at the September 24 meeting to consider an application for a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign located southeast of the intersection of Slater Road and Cliff Road for an Amoco Station. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the application. For additional information on this item refer to the staff report found on pages_ through For action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s) /7,-0 through 1V. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the pylon sign for the Amoco Gas Station as presented. 115 CITY OF EAGAN r _ SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: ROBERT SCHLANAGAN LOCATION: Ll, B1, OAK CLIFF 3RD AD, (NWh, SEC 31) EXISTING ZONING:-N.B. - NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS, I WINKLER-JACKSON P.D., 82-3 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 27, 1'985 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 19, 1985 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign located S.E. of the intersection of Slaters Road and Cliff Road. COMMENTS: Under the existing sign ordinances, a business with freeway frontage is allowed 2 -signs: one - 7 feet in height and one pylon sign with a 27 foot height limit and 250 square foot total area (125 sq. ft./side). The original conditional use application called for a 50 foot sign and a sq. ft: area of 170 ft. per side (340 sq. ft. total). The applicant has been - notified of the Eagan sign ordinances and will be making the required revisions. If approved, the pylon sign shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) The pylon- sign may not be located within 300' of any other pylon sign measured on the same side of the street. 2) The pylon sign .may not project more than 27' above ground level. 3) The pylon sign may not -exceed 125 sq. ft. of signage per side. 4) The pylon sign shall -not be located nearer than 10' from any property or dividing line. 5) The sign shall be in conformance with all other applicable ordinances. r;. : Signage Description: 10'x 16'8" Torch and Oval Plastic Interior Illuminated "V" Pole Mounting Heights 30' @ 30 P.S.F. Wind Load 40' @ 32 P.S.F. Wind Load 50' @ 34 P.S.F. Wind Load 60' @ 35 P.S.F. Wind Load 50' @ 40 P-S.F. Wind Load 60' @ 40 P.S.F. Wind Load Metal portion of sign { _ frame black AMOCO ; g0�1No RAMP TO 7pTE sou TVA NWY NO 7� H y� -I - ------ ------ odoa s831WIs --� -- x I 1O - vi O� c r N` �f� V)!_ ;... o U L \ V � � � =r ai o l •L _ li- L1 ;+ 1 W Cl) C.) / 1 �/ r - om m r r - ! L - ------ ------ odoa s831WIs --� -- W W Cl) C.) \ •L4 1 �/ L - ------ ------ odoa s831WIs --� -- APC Minutes September 24, 1985 9. All costs associated with public improvements within this development shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 10. All standard engineering conditions which apply shall be adhered to. 11. The Dakota County Plat Commission recommendation concerning lighting at the intersection with Diffley Road shall be provided. Those in favor were Hall, Wold, McCrea, Bohne and Trygg; those against were Wilkins and Harrison. ROBERT SCHLANGEN - AMOCO STATION —CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A public hearing on the application of Robert Schlangen for conditional use permit for a pylon sign located southeast of the intersection of Slaters Road and Cliff Road, at the proposed Amoco Station was next convened by the Chairman. The location would be on Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Cliff 3rd Addition and Dale Runkle explained the proposed sign location, including its relation to the Cedar Avenue Freeway. The proposed signage would be reduced to two 6 foot by 10 foot signs with one on the ground and one on the pylon. The proposal was for a 28 foot pole plus 6 feet for the sign which would require an overall 15 foot variance. Representatives from Northstar Engineering were present, as was Mr. Schlangen. Member McCrea objected to the variance, noting that the reason for the variance does not appear to be valid in the present situation. " It was also indicated that the Amoco station was aware of the freeway setting when it chose to locate at that site. The base of the sign would be 7 feet below the street and it did not appear that it would be advisable to allow the extreme variance for site distance purposes. Harrison moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend denial of the application for reasons including the foregoing, and the following: 1. That there were inadequate reasons submitted by the applicant for the variance requested. Those in favor were Harrison, Bohne and McCrea; those against were Hall, Wold, Wilkins and Trygg. Wold then moved, McCrea seconded the motion to approve the application for conditional use permit for pylon sign subject to the following recommendations: 1. That the price sign will include 30 square feet, with the oval sign 60 square feet, for a total of 190 square feet. 2. The pylon sign shall not be located within 300 feet of any other pylon sign measured on the same side of the street. 3. The pylon sign shall not project more than 27 feet above the center line of Cliff Road. 4. The pylon sign shall not exceed 90 square feet of signage per side. /0 4 APC Minutes September 24, 1985 5. The pylon sign shall not be located nearer than 10 feet from any property or dividing line. 6. The sign shall be in conformance with all other applicable ordinances. Those in favor were Hall, Wold, Wilkins and Trygg; those against were Harrison, Bohne and McCrea. FRED WILSON - WAIVER OF PLAT - BLACKHAWK ROAD The public hearing regarding the application of Fred B. Wilson for waiver of plat in order to split a 4.4 acre parcel -into two lots located in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Se;Etion 15, south of Blackhawk Road next was presented to the Planning Crammission members. Dale Runkle explained the application and noted thax'Othe parcel lies adjacent to Blue Cross -Blue Shield,.north,of Blackhawk Road,�with the Hillcrest development to the west. The parcels would provide for Z acres with existing residence and a 2.4 vacant area. The reaAon for the re4est for variance was that there was a lot line dispute and it wad recommen id that the formal plat be required and approved by the City, pr or to thy+grant of a building permit on the residue 2.4 acre parcel. Bill Cardinell, an adjlpce& neighboring owner, appeared with certain questions and indicated that"i he lot line issue has not been resolved. He had questions about the waiver", and objected to further subdivision of the vacant residue parcel. f j Mrs. Wilson and Brdd Swensn were present. Member Harrison had questions regarding topograph,7" and Br�d Swenson stated that his opinion was that the residue lot is buildable. r- Bohne moved Zo recommend app�loval, McCrea seconded the motion, subject to the following:/ 1. Compliance with all other City Ordinance requirements. 2. Tiot no building permit will be allowed on the residue parcel until the final plat is approved by the City Council. All voted in favor. FEDEBA11AND COMPANY - CEDAR CLIFF - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The public hearing regarding the application of Federal Land Company for conditional use permit to allow pylon sign for the office building at the southwest corner of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition along Nicols Road was convened by Chairman Chuck Hall. City Planner Dale Runkle described the application and indicated that the sign would be two -directional with four separate advertising panels. The height would be 24 feet with 210 feet of total signage. The applicant would be required to comply with the City Ordinance, including the 300 foot spacing. wl W Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-six WAIVER OF PLAT FOR A LOT SPLIT/FRED B. WILSON F. Waiver of Plat for a Lot Split, Fred B. Wilson of 4.4 Acres Located East of T.H. 13 and South of the Intersection of Blue Cross and Blackhawk Roads --An application was submitted requesting a waiver of plat in order -to split one 4.4 acre parcel into two lots as described. A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their September 24 meeting and they are recommending approval of the waiver of plat to the City Council. For additional information on the matter, refer to the City Planner's report found on pages 17,3 /Zj� . For additional information on the action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(ZZI _. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for a lot split for Fred B. Wilson as presented. Note: Enclosed on pages and is a copy of a memorandum from the Director of Public Works. �T CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: FRED B WILSON (BRAD SWENSON) LOCATION: SE4 & NE4 OF SECTION 17 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 24, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: SES EMBER 16, 1985 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat in order to split one (1) 4.40 acre parcel into 2 lots located in the SE4 and NE -4 of Section 15, south of Blackhawk Road. COMMENTS: The subject R-1 (single family) parcel is surrounded by Blue Cross/Blue Shield north of Blackhawk Road, Hillcrest Developments neighborhood business (NB) to the west and undeveloped R-2 to the south, and a R-1 area to the east. Proposed parcel A will be ± 2.0 acres and proposed parcel B will be + 2.4 acres. The State of Minnesota has not monumented this area and as a result platting is difficult. The applicant is asking for a Waiver with the intent to plat both parcels at the time of platting parcel B. This platting would be completed before any building occurs in parcel B. The easements between the parcels will also be defined at that time. Currently, there are no utility problems and the existing setbacks are within City Code. /Z3 CER TI9ICATE OF SURVEY FOR MR. MRS. WILSON Lay. 13 = zYoo'ys" BcA w K RCE!_ A D&O. FA 5"V1. 90 --- X3/7. `6 N 79.37.2S"W I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. 9?6 SCALE I"=100' Bradley J. Swenson Mn.Reg. No. 15235 Date: 8 Z ,� TOPOGRAPHY 171,6 lJ SCALE, I"=100' APC Minutes September 24, 1985 5. The pylon sign shall not be located nearer than 10 feet from any property or dividing line. 6. The sign shall be in conformance with all other applicable ordinances. Those in favor were Hall, Wold, Wilkins and Trygg; those against were Harrison, Bohne and McCrea. FRED WILSON - WAIVER OF PLAT - BLACKHAWR ROAD The public hearing regarding the application of Fred B. Wilson for waiver of plat in order to split a 4.4 acre parcel into two lots located in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, south of Blackhawk Road next was presented to the Planning Commission members. Dale Runkle explained the application and noted that the parcel lies adjacent to Blue Cross -Blue Shield, north of Blackhawk Road with the Hillcrest development to # the west. The parcels would provide for 2 acres with existing residence and a 2.4 vacant area. The reason for the request for variance was that there was a lot line dispute and it was recommended that the formal plat be required and approved by the City, prior to the grant of a building permit on the residue 2.4 acre parcel. Bill Cardinell, an adjacent neighboring owner, appeared with certain questions and indicated that the lot line issue has not been resolved. He had questions about the waiver and objected to further subdivision of the vacant residue parcel. Mrs. Wilson and Brad Swenson were present. Member Harrison had questions regarding topography and Brad Swenson stated that his opinion was that the residue lot is buildable. Bohne moved to recommend approval, McCrea seconded the motion, subject to the following: 1. Compliance with all other City Ordinance requirements. 2. That no building permit will be allowed on the residue parcel until the final plat is approved by the City Council. All voted in favor. FEDERAL LAND COMPANY - CEDAR CLIFF - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The public hearing regarding the application of Federal Land Company for conditional use permit to allow pylon sign for the office building at the southwest corner of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition along Nicols Road was convened by Chairman Chuck Hall. City Planner Dale Runkle described the application and indicated that the sign would be two -directional with four separate advertising panels. The height would be 24 feet with 210 feet of total signage. The applicant would be required to comply with the City Ordinance, including the 300 foot spacing. p-7 5 MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1985 SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT - FRED B. WILSON (BRAD SWENSON) As a normal staff procedure, all applications for subdivisions of property through platting are processed through the Engineering Division for review, comment and recommendations for conditions of approval. However, the above -requested "waiver" of platting in- advertently did not have a formal engineering staff review per- formed. Subsequently, I would like to make the following concerns known for consideration during the review of this application. The applicant has indicated an intent to plat both parcels at the time that a building permit is requested on the newly created vacant parcel "B". However, at some future time, there will be no incentive, commitment or requirement of the new owner of parcel "A" to enter into a plat which will have certain financial commitments associated with that process, all in accordance with standard City procedures. In addition, the Engineering Division does not believe that just because it would be "difficult" to perform the required surveys necessary to plat this property, is adequate reason or sufficient justification of hardship to preclude the normal platting process associated with subdivisions of land. One of the areas of review by the Engineering Divison pertains to past, present and future assessment obligations and liabilities associated with the creation of new buildable sites. This assess- ment review results in the following information: Trunk area water main assessments for this parcel were previously proposed to be assessed in 1976 but were requested to be deferred until the time of future subdivision and development. Therefore, this assessment should be activated as a condition of this subdivison. Similarily, this property has not paid its lateral benefit from the trunk water main that presently exists along Blackhawk Road. This should also be a condition of this subdivision. Presently, Blackhawk Road is upgraded to only a 24 ft. street surface with gravel shoulders and no concrete curb and gutter. This property should either be required to bring this street up to present day standards with concrete curb and gutter as a condition of their subdivision or to prepay their estimated future assessments /z8 THOMAS L. HEDGES SEPTEMBER 27, 1985 PAGE 2 associated with this anticipated future improvement. The additional assessments to bring this street up to their standard residential obligations takes into consideration the past assessments paid for the grading, gravel base and first -phase bituminous construc- tion. Assessment Calculations Trunk Area Water - 4.4 acres @$1,190/acre = $5,236 Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main - 575 ft. @$11.88/FF = $6,828.13 Future Street Assessment - 575 ft. @$32.45/FF @54%* _ $10,075.73 Total _.,._ $22,139.86 The assessments associated with the future upgrading of Blackhawk Road has been previously and equitably applied to developments along Blackhawk Road (Ridgeview Acres, Blackhawk Oaks, Hillandale Addition No. 2, Art Rahn Addition, etc.), Elrene Road (South Hills Addition, Windtree Addition, Johannes Addition), etc. I regret that this information was not available for consideration by the Planning Commission, but it is hoped that the City Council can take it into consideration during their review of this request. '9_�ctfully submit -ted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Rich Hefti, Assistant City Engineer Dale Runkle, City Planner *Note: This percentage takes into consideration that past assess- ments provided for only approximately 460 of a standard residential equivalent street. Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-seven PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR NORWEST 2ND ADDITION G. Preliminary Plat for Norwest 2nd Addition for Two Lots on Approximately3.8 Acres --An application was submitted for a pre- liminary plat for Norwest 2nd Addition. This plat consists of approximately 3.8 acres. and will contain two commercial lots located just north of the existing Norwest Bank facility. The APC held a public hearing on September 24 and is recommending approval of the Norwest 2nd Addition plat. The Parkview Family Care Clinic is not intended to satisfy the 24-hour emergency care facility objective addressed earlier on the agenda. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning throuh Depart- ment report; a copy is enclosed on pages �31 g 3 For action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to those miniutes found on page(s)�%[ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for the Norwest 2nd Addition. /3a 6 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: NORWEST 2ND ADDITION APPLICANT: MILO PINKERTON - NORWEST PROPERTIES LOCATION: SA OF SECTION 10 EXISTING ZONING: LB (LIMITED BUSINESS) UNDER THE NORWEST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 24, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 18, 1985 REPORTED BY: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: . An application had been submitted for Preliminary Plat for Norwest 2nd Addition. This plat consists of approx. 3.8 acres and will contain 12 commercial lots located in part of the SW4 of Section 10, just north of the existing Norwest Bank facility. ZONING & LAND USE: Presently, the parcel has been designated a L.B. (limited business) use within the Norwest Planned Development. The Comprehensive Guide Plan also designates this parcel as an L.B. designation, therefore, the Comp. Guide and the Planned Development Land Uses are consistent with each other. BACKGROUND: Both parcels in the P.D. are zoned L.B. in the Norwest Planned Development. Staff understood that the City would make the final determination as to the appropriate uses of this L.B. once retail plans had been submitted proposing a use for this property. Norwest Properties began this process in August, 1985, making application to develop the 3.8 acres into 2 commercial lots. On Lot 1 there was proposed to be a Hardee's Restaurant but it is now the City's understanding that Hardee's have withdrawn their option on the property. Norwest Properties is now pursuing the Parkview Family Care Clinic on this same parcel. The use has now changed from a restaurant to a medical facility which is consistent and permitted within the L.B. (limited business) zoning district. SITE PLAN: The proposed clinic will be a one story, brick building with a prefinished metal canopy entry. The color has not yet been determined but the brick would be compatible with the bank facility to the south and also with Cereal Chemist to the north. All exterior sides will consist of brick as will the trash enclosure area. The nrain entry will be from Norwest Court with a secondary access to the south, when all of the improvements have been com- pleted. Norwest Ct is proposed to be a public street to the point where it provides access to the Norwest Bank facility. Staff has reviewed the detailed site plan. The building meets 131 NORWEST 2ND ADDITION SEPTEMBER 24, 1985 PAGE 2 all of the setback criteria and the clinic facility exceeds the parking space requirements of the City Code. This new lot configur- ation has not changed from what was submitted a month ago, however, it has changed from the original concept of providing access to the Norwest Bank facility. This new lot has increased in size which will mean that Norwest Ct will have to be relocated further to the east. With this relocation, the utilities, which have been installed, will be in the parking lot area of the clinic and will have easements granted to the City when the road alignment is moved further to the east. We understand that a detailed landscape plan, including berms and buffering of parking areas, will be submitted and reviewed prior to final plat application. Lot 2, contains approx. 2.5 acres and is proposed to be constructed as a 25,000 square foot strip shopping facility. Ryan Construction is the applicant proposing to construct this building. In meeting with Ryan Construction, it was determined that they would like to pursue 40% restaurant, 30% small businesses and office and 30% retail. In review of the strict limited business portion of the City Code, a retail operation would not be allowed in the L.B. district. Staff has been working with Ryan Construction giving input to the site plan and trying to determine what uses would or would not be acceptable in this L.B. district. Staff requests that Ryan Construction meet with the APC to receive input as to what the Commission would like to see in this strip center and comments which could be obtained from this meeting prior to detail plans being prepared and submitted at a later Commission meeting. Since the City has received one detailed site plan, which does meet the criteria of the P.D. process and one concept planas to how'the area may develop with input from the Commission, it would be the City's intention to split the two uses at this time. This would allow the medical clinic facility, which is anxious to obtain a location, to be into construction as soon as possible proceeding to City Council allowing development of this particular lot and block as soon as the platting criteria has been fulfilled. The Commission could act informally on lot 2, the Ryan Construction piece, giving input at the September meeting and possible formal action at the October meeting. CONDITIONS: 1. All of the standard plat conditions shall be applicable to this development. 2. The building will be constructed of brick and all four sides shall be treated with the same architectural design. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and berms shall be included screening the parking areas from public roadways. A landscape bond shall be required and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. /3 � NORWEST 2ND ADDITION SEPTEMBER 24, 1985 PAGE 3. 4. Only one lot will -be approved, which is the site of Parkview Family Care Clinic. 5. All easements shall be dedicated to the City for utilities if and when the road alignment is shifted further to the east. 133 r r D rr rr ul l3,f5 �v m T r „a W rvLM BLUFF NALO !EM Y 21 PUBLIC NORKS WAGE vL OLEARY PARK- COACHMAN /j / 0 I V, m m 0• z CA) z O 1 13F PON ----------- ----------- N /39 APC Minutes September 24, 1985 4. Only one lot will be approved, which is the site of the proposed Parkview Family Care Clinic and the other lot shall be platted as an outlot. 5. All easements shall be dedicated to the City for utilities if and when the road alignment is shifted further to the east. 6. Storm sewer shall be installed to pick up the water from the south curb of Norwest Court prior to runoff reaching Pilot Knob Road. 7. No individual access shall be allowed on Pilot Knob Road. 8. A 55 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob Road. A 50 foot full right-of-way for Norwest Court. 9. A 20 foot easement shall be dedicated over the watermain extension. 10. This development shall be responsible for its related trunk area water, trunk area sewer, trunk area storm sewer upgrading and lateral benefit from trunk watermain assessments that is its responsibility. 11. All costs associated with this development shall be the sole responsibility of this development. Mr. Tollefson suggested that alternates to the proposed screening, other than berming along Norwest Court, be presented to the City for final approval. All members voted in favor except Hall who abstained for personal reasons. " NORWEST 2ND ADDITION - LOT 2 - RETAIL CENTER Pat Ryan, the Vice President of Ryan Construction Company appeared informally to discuss with the Planning Commission members the proposed use of Lot 2, Norwest 2nd Addition. Preliminary sketches of a retail and office mall were reviewed by Mr. Ryan and there was discussion concerning the Limited Business use for the property. Parking and signing of the property was discussed and Mr. Ryan indicated Pizza Hut is interested in a portion of the site. Other uses would include light retail and office uses. There were questions about the traffic intense uses and it was also recommended that access to the north be explored by the owners. There were questions about loading at the rear of the building, and Mr. Ryan noted only doors will be provided at the back side and very little loading, although space will be provided behind the berm for trucks. The property is zoned Planned Development and the Planning Commission could approve the project and specific uses. Low density traffic uses would be recommended within the Limited Business use categories, and there were concerns about traffic flow and adequacy of space at the ends of the building. Planning Commission members were expressed extreme concern, however, about the excessive commercial uses including dairy stores, within the City. No formal action was taken. 114 9 Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-eight SPECIAL PERMIT/DIRECTION SIGN FOR LUNDGREN BROS. CONSTRUCTION H. Special Permit for Lundgren Brothers Construction for a Direction Sign at Yankee Doodle Road and Federal Drive --An application was submitted for a special permit to allow a two -directional sign located southeast of the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Federal Drive from Lundgren Brothers Construction. For addi- tional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report found on pages / Z through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special permit for Lundgren Brothers Construction as it relates to the two -directional sign. /W CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION WILLIAM H ALLEN LOCATION: NE4, SECTION 16 EXISTING ZONING: P.D. 75-2 BICENTENNIAL ADDITION DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 1, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 25, 1985 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a Special Permit to allow a two directional sign located SE of the intersection of Yankee Doodle Rd and Federal Dr. COMMENTS: The subject sign is located on Federal Land Company property in the Bicentennial Addition Planned Development. The height appears to be within City Code (7' maximum? and each side will have ± 21 square feet of "sign" area. City Code also requires that the sign be 10' or more from the property lines. If approved the sign shall be subject to all applicable sign ordinances. 0, r t-4 /�3 i COUNTRY HOMES .AT by.... _ LUnDGREM Bpos�Nc.���� n 1 MILE > !�ttN &T/�5 .N.i Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-nine IMPLEMENTATION OF FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS ACT REQUIREMENTS A. Implementation of Federal Labor Standards Act Requirements - The City Administrator has reviewed on several occasions the necessity for our Municipal Corporation to comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act. The Department of Labor has allowed municipalities until October 15 to comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act. Administrative Assistant Duffy has coordinated compliance regulations with all City departments and through several management/department head meetings, the issue of exempt and non-exempt employees has been discussed and a recommendation is suggested to satisfy compliance with the FLSA. There are a number of issues that need to be addressed by the City Council and approved in the form of a resolution. Those issues are outlined in a draft resolution that is prepared for City Council consideration and found on pages _&_ through 150. There are some other issues that relate to cash compensation for compensatory time that will need to be addressed by the City Council. The City Administrator, given the time on Tuesday evening, will discuss those issues with City Council. If time does not permit, it is recommended that overtime compensation for all non-exempt employees be discussed following the comprehensive guide plan discussion at the October 8 work session with the Advisory Planning Commission. Additional information relating to the overtime compensation will be distributed on Monday with the administrative packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a resolution of compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act as presented. MEMO TO:. TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: HOLLY DUFFY, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1985 SUBJECT: COMPLIANCE WITH THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT As you are aware, because of a recent Supreme Court decision, the City of Eagan is now subject to provisions ,of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).. The main provisions of the act which now affect City employees are the minimum wage requirement and the time and one-half cash payment for overtime requirement. The City is in compliance with the minimum wage requirement. In order to be in compliance with the overtime cash payment requirement, it will be necessary to abolish the practice of awarding compensatory time off as a method of compensating employees for overtime. This should be accomplished by official City Council action. Wording in the City's Personnel Policy and in the various collective bargaining contracts will have to be changed as re- quired by law to substitute time and one-half cash payment for overtime instead of compensatory time. Union representatives should be officially notified that, because of the requirements of the FLSA, these changes are being made. Neither the employer, the employee nor the union may waive the requirement for time and one-half cash payment for all overtime earned in excess of 40 hours in one workweek. This is the minimum requirement. There are separate regulations for sworn police officers. According to the FLSA regulations as stated by the Department of Labor, it will also be necessary to make a retroactive cash payment to all non-exempt employees for all compensatory time recorded since April 15, 1985. I have drafted a resolution which contains all the actions the City of Eagan must legally take, to be in compliance with the FLSA. A copy of that resolution is attached immediately following this page. The actions and practices described in the resolution must be taken according to the law. CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION COMPPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS ACT WHEREAS due to a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States in "Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority," municipal governments must comply with provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) in their personnel and employment practices; and WHEREAS many of the employment practices of the City of Eagan already comply with the requirements of the FLSA; and WHEREAS, according to the present policy of the United States Department of Labor, retroactive compliance to April 15, 1985, is required; and WHEREAS, among other requirements, the FLSA states that a cash payment of one and one-half (1-1/2) times the regular rate of pay be made for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek for employees covered by the act with the exception of sworn police officers who must receive this payment for all hours worked over 171 in a 28 -day work period; and WHEREAS, neither the employer or the employee can waive `he provisions of the act; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan will bring all of its employment practices into compliance with the requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), including, -but not limited to, the following: /�7 FLSA RESOLUTION OCTOBER 1, 1985 PAGE 2 1. The following employee positions are designated as exempt from provisions of the FLSA as determined by the City of Eagan from criteria set forth in the FLSA: a. Mayor n. Assistant City Engineer b. Councilmembers o. Supt. of Streets & Equipment c. City Administrator p. Supt. of Utilities & Buildings d. Director of Finance/City Clerk/ q. Recreation Programmer/Supervisor Treasurer r. Park Planner/Landscape Architect e. Director of Public Works s. Administrative Captain f. City Planner t. Operations Captain g. Chief Building Official u. Cable Administrator h. Fire Marshal/Civil Defense v. Park Foreman Director/Asst. Bldg. Official w. Utilities Maint. Supervisor/ i. Director of Parks & Recreation Water Plant j. Chief of Police x. Planner I k. Administrative Assistant(s) - y. Office Manager Administration z. Seasonal Recreation Program 1. Assistant Finance Director Workers (not maintenance) m. Administrative Assistant - aa. All Volunteers (Volunteer Fire Finance Department Members, Advisory Commission & Committee Members•) bb. Accountant 2. Any position not named above is considered non-exempt and subject to the provisions of the FLSA. 3. The workweek for all non-exempt employees, with the ni exception of sworn police officers, begins at 12:01 a.m. on any Sunday and ends at 12:00 midnight on any Saturday. 4. The work period for all sworn police officers will be a 28 consecutive day period beginning at 12:01 a.m. on Sunday, October 13, 1985, and ending at 12:00 midnight on Saturday, November 9, 1985, and occurring every 28 days following this initial period. 5. Any practice of awarding compensatory time off as a method of compensating for hours worked over 40 in a 7 -day workweek (or hours worked by sworn police officers over 171 in a 28 -day work period) is hereby abolished. ��g 4 1 RESOLUTION SEPTEMBER 25, 1985 PAGE 3 6. A cash payment of one and one-half times the regular hourly rate of pay will be made to all non-exempt personnel for all hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek or as otherwise required by collective bargaining contracts and/or Personnel Policy language, with the exception of sworn police officers to whom a cash payment of time and one-half the regular hourly rate of pay will be made for all hours worked in excess of 171 in a regular 28 -day work period. 7. Portions of the City's personnel policy relating to overtime compensation and compensatory time which are not currently in compliance with FLSA requirements will be rewritten to reflect FLSA requirement compliance. 8. Since portions of the collective bargaining contracts which award either compensatory time instead of time and one-half cash payment for overtime hours or cash payment "in lieu of" time and one-half cash payment for overt.ime hours are no longer legal, Union representatives will be notified that the City of Eagan will compensate all hours worked over 40 in a workweek (or all hours worked over 171 by sworn police officers in a 28 -day work period) by a one and one-half times the regular hourly rate of pay cash payment as re- qu i r ed by law. 9. A cash payment for all hours actually worked (as determined by FLSA guidelines) over 40 in a workweek for all non-exempt employees for which cash compensation at one and one-half times the regular hourly rate has not previously been made will be paid retroactively the period covering April 15, . �t q r t FLSA RESOLUTION OCTOBER 1, 1985 PAGE 4- 1985, through October 1, 1985. The same payment will be made to all sworn police officers for all hours actually worked over 171 in retroactive 28 -day work periods from April 15, 1985, through October 12, 1985. 10. Regular rates of pay as defined by the FLSA will be computed for all non-exempt employees when overtime payment calcula- tions are performed. 11. The record keeping requirements as defined by the FLSA will be performed. 12. The minimum wage poster will be displayed. 13. Compliance with the minimum wage requirement will continue. MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: MEMBERS VOTING IN FAVOR: MEMBERS VOTING AGAINST: Date: October 1, 1985 CITY COUNCIL T CITY OF EAGAN ATTEST: BY: City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATION I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a RESOLUTION, adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, on October 1 , 1985. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk (Seal) /�� City of Eagan Agenda Information Memo October 1, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Thirty PROPOSED CHANGES TO LICENSE AND FEE SCHEDULES B. Proposed Changes to License and Fee Schedules — Administrative Assistant Hohenstein has sent a memorandum to the City attorney's office -.addressing several questions that were raised at the most recent special City Council meeting relating to proposed fee schedule changes to various license and permits. The City attorney is responding to that memorandum and it is anticipated that a copy of his response will be provided the ad 'nistrative packet on Monday. Enclosed on pages 157 through is a brief memorandum and copy of the proposed fee changes for those license and permits where a fee change is recommended. All other license and permits will either be addressed during organizational business in January or there is no fee change to be considered. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny proposed changes to the license and fee schedule as presented. 1,5/ MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM:. -JON HOHENSTEIN, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT _, DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 1985. SUBJECT: FEE SCHEDULE - PROPOSED CHANGES Pursuant to the discussion of the City Council at the September 24, 1985, Budget Meeting, I have prepared a list of the fees which are to be given consideration for change. An amended copy of the comprehensive schedule can be made available to allow reference to fee contexts where appropriate. Several points should be made relative to the list below. First, the Council's concern about Conditional Use Permit fees, their renewal and their overlap with other permit fees is being addressed in an extensive study by Liz Witt, Administrative Assistant. She has been investigating the status of our CUP's and will prepare a detailed tier proposal as the culmination of her study. As this study will be available for Council review in November, I respectfully request that the consideration of CUP fee changes be postponed until that time. As her study will touch on Special Use Permits, they too were removed from consideration at this time. Second, staff discovered that cities of the second class are prevented from raising off -sale liquor licenses above $200.00 per year. The inclusion of cities of the first class in the MVCOG study obscured this fact. Staff regrets the oversight and has removed this item from the list of changes. In addition, the On - Sale Club License is limited to its current level by statute. Third, a budget projection of the total number of certain permits or licenses is provided in paranthesis after the fee labels. Per your request, I have included this information to allow the Council to gauge the cumulative effects of certain proposed changes. Such information is included wherever the number of permits or licenses is reasonably bounded. As mentioned previously, liquor license fees are established within the ordinance and require an ordinance amendment to accomplish. I have requested that City Attorney Hauge draft the necessary amendments for Council action. The remainder of the fees may be adopted by resolution of the Council. If you have any further questions on this matter, let me know. I can be available for Tuesday's meeting, it necessary. Ad nis ative Assistant �✓ Attachment �Jy JH/db a PROPOSED FEE CHANGES Fee Type SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING Preliminary Plat Rezoning and Planned Development Waiver of Plat Assessment Search Vacation Proceedings FINANCE/CLERK - LIQUOR Beer -Application & Investigation -Off-Sale License (12) -On-Sale License (14) -Temporary License (5) Liquor -On-Sale License (10) Wine -Application & Investigation -Sunday License FINANCE/CLERK - ADDITIONAL Cigarette License (75) Rubbish Hauler -1st Truck ( 17) -Each Additional (18) Service Station (7) Solicitors (5) Dog License -Male or Female (Unaltered) Kennel Permit -Renewal INSPECTIONS Electrical Permit Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Plumbing & Gas Fitting Alterations to Plumbing & HVAC ENGINEERING Maintenance Equipment & Personnel Costs -Foremen & Pickup Truck -Single Axle Truck with Operator -Tandem Truck w/Operator -Tractor w/Operator Current Fee 100.00 150.00 75.00 5.00 $25.00 plus 100% of cost 200.00 25.00 100.00 15.00 3,000.00 200.00 100.00 12.00 25.00 10.00 25.00 5.00 5.00 15.00 State Fee/ Contractor 20.00+ 1.00s/c 20.00+ 1.00s/c 5.00+ .50s/c 30.00/hr 35.00/hr 38.00/hr 25.00/hr Staff Proposed 300.00 250.00 100.00 8.00 75.00 350.00 40.00 250.00 25.00 6,500.00 350.00 200.00 25.00 40.00 20.00 150.00 25.00 M K 25.00 New State Fee Sliding Scale Sliding Scale Sliding Scale 37.50/hr 45.00/hr 48.00/hr 32.00/hr Council Proposed 300.00 250.00 100.00 8.00 75.00 350.00 40.00 175.00 25.00 4,000.00 350.00 200.00 25.00 40.00 20.00 50.00 25.00 6.00 25.00 New State Fee Sliding Scale Sliding Scale Sliding Scale 40.00/hr 45.00/hr 50.00/hr 30.00/hr R n u PROPOSED FEE CHANGES SEPTEMBER 26, 1985 PAGE 2 Fee Tie -Backhoe/Loader w/Operator -Front End Loader with Operator -Road Grader w/Operator -Street Sweeper w/Operator -Foreman -Maintenance Person UTILITY RATES AND FEES Shut-off Charge Delivery of Shut Off Notice PARKS AND RECREATION Rahn Building Northview Athletic Field Chuckwagon Grill Canopy 50.00/day 75.00/day 125.00/day or 150.00/day 150.00/2 days and 200.00 +150.00 damage damage dep. Deposit New 15.00 New 50.00/day /5�1- 75.00/day 150.00/day and 200.00 damage dep. 15.00 50.00/day Staff Council Current Proposed Proposed Fee Fee Fee 45.00/hr 52.00/hr 50.00/hr 60.00/hr 69.00/hr 70.00/hr 60.00/hr 69.00/hr 70.00/hr New 56.00/hr 55.00/hr 13.50/hr 18.80/hr 19.00/hr 11.25/hr 16.20/hr 16.00/hr 10.00 25.00 25.00 5.00 10.00 10.00 50.00/day 75.00/day 125.00/day or 150.00/day 150.00/2 days and 200.00 +150.00 damage damage dep. Deposit New 15.00 New 50.00/day /5�1- 75.00/day 150.00/day and 200.00 damage dep. 15.00 50.00/day MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1985 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE COMPOST SITE According to Administrative Assistant Hohenstein, brush will work in the wood chipper, and its intended use is for edging, bedding, etc., not compost. In addition, permanent signage has been ordered which -will indicate brush will be accepted in small quantities. There is some concern about brush, however it is the opinion of Parks & Recreation that we attempt to accept brush, process it and if there are problems recognized this year, the program can be reevaluated and changed in the fall of 1986. The location of the second compost site is northeast of the Park & Ride site, actually located north of Beecher, and located at the intersection of Blackhawk Road and Beecher. This site is only a drop-off site; City personnel will transfer the material left when the manned site can be opened. Composting or fermintation will occur only at the City Hall site. The site has surmountable curbing, not requiring a curb cut as discussed at the special meeting. Please refer to the attached map, referenced as page for more detail on the specific location. HRA Enclosed is correspondence regarding the scattered -site housing program that is shared between the Dakota County HRA and City of Eagan. A copy of the letter is enclosed on page )15r'. MASAC Enclosed on pages jo throughL J�r is a copy of the most recent minutes of the August 27 MASAC meeting. AMM BULLETIN Enclosed is a copy of an AMM bulletin for information and review by the City Council. This can be found on pages Z& through Z7/ _. SENECA PLANT Enclosed on pages / 7/ through / is correspondence from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commis ion pertaining to 1) Seneca Plant odors, and 2) the MWCC Septage Management Program and disposal site selection with regard to the City of Eagan. /5�5 FEDERAL TAX REFORM Enclosed on pages through 17e? is a copy of a memorandum from the League of minnesota. Cities addressing a recent meeting that Mayor Blomquist attended in Washington, D.C., with Congressman Frenzel. Instead of paying one-half of the airplane fare, it appears that the League is collecting donations from a number of communities. The City of Eagan's contribution toward the airplane fare will be $80. If the City Council finds this memoran- dum to be acceptable, the City Administrator will make payment of the $80 to the League of Minnesota Cities to help defray these expenses. MUNICIPAL BOND RATING The City's fiscal advisor, Mr. Ernie Clark, is recommending the City meet with representatives of Moody's and Standard & Poors in an effort to increase the A rating to an Al rating for the upcoming bond sale on November 6. The amount of the bond sale will be approximately nine to ten million dollars. A bond rating trip involving the Chairman of the Finance Committee, Director of Finance and City Administrator is planned for the days of October 21 and October 22. Since the City Administrator is planning to vacation out east in Washington, D.C., prior to the National Conference, he will drive to New York City and attend the two-day meetings with Councilman Smith, the Director of Finance and Ernie Clark. CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE/OFFICE STAFF CHANGES Enclosed is a memorandum outlining some significant changes that have occurred in staffing at the City Attorney's office. The memorandum is enclosed on pages 1p0 through /?/. EAGAN BUS TOUR As a reminder, the Eagan bus tour is scheduled for 3:00 P.M., Thursday, October 3, 1985. The location is Al Bakers. /s/ Thomas L. Hedqes TLH/jj /Sb tNff Drive' E-1 �i ver ..\ige Circle E-3 .iverton''i.�=,�.e D-7 tiverton Circ: D-7 2iverton POint*`LC7 robin Lane C -D,5-6 tocky Lane* G-7 togers Coni. t J-9 toll Lane R-3 iustenRoad A-12 fustic Hills Drive E-2 Safai_ ou levard 5-10 Safari Circle C-12 safari Court North C-12 Safari Court South C-12 iaf ari Pass C-12 safari Trail C-12 ialem Point* D-11 Sally Circle K-3 _ .sandstone Drive 2-9 Sapphire Lane B -S 3artell Avenue 0-7 Savannah Road I-7 Scott Trail B-10 Seneca Road C-6 Senja Court D-11 Sequoia Drive F-9 Serpentine Circle D-7 Serpentine Drive D-7 Shale Lane B{,9 Shawnee Road C,5-6 Sheffield Circle E-12 Sheffield Lane E-12 Sherman Court G-4 Sherwood Court E-12 Sherwood Way E-12 Shevlin Court E-11 Sibley Hills Drive E-2 Sibley Memorial Highway A -F,1-9 Sigfrid Street G-9 Silver Bell Circle D-7 Silver Bell Road B -D,6 Skylark Lane D-8 Skyline Road F-2 Sl,' - Road -A,10-12 Sn 1 Paint• D-11 Sn. .ke Drive* E-4 Sorrel Point- D-11 South Hills Circle R-6 South Hills Court K-6 South Hills Drive K-6 South Hills Lane R-6 South Hills Way R-6 South MeadowlarkRoad D -S South Wescott Hills Drive J-9 Southridge Avenue F-2 Spoonbill Circle H-5 Stavern Point•D-11 Stirrup Street K-9 Stor' �d Road A-12 St ry Lane G-8 Su, Lane J-10 Sun ff Road C-9 Sunne Point• D-11 Sunrise Court C-9 Sunrise Road C-9 Sunset Drive K-9 Superior Court K-10 Surrey Heights Drive F-5 Svensk Lane G-9 Svensk Lana :forth G-9 -T Taconite Point D-8 Taconite Trail C -D,8 Tampere Circle D-11 Tam joint* D-11 Ts Court H-6 Te. ave E-9 Terminal Drive D-4 Thomas Lake Road E -F,9-10 Thomas Lane F-11 Thrush Point• D-11 Ticonderoga Trail I-7 Tiffany Circle North H-10 Tiffany Circle South H-10 Tiffany Court H-10 Tiffany Drive H -I,10 Tiffany Place I-10 Tiffany Point H-10 Timbershore Lane G-6 Timber Wolf Court C-9 Timber Wolf Trail North C-9 Timber Wolf Trail South C-9 Topaz Drive B-8 Towerview Road F -G,3 Trails End Road J-5 Trapp Road G -H, 1 Traverse Point* D-11 Trenton Lane E-11 Trenton Road 3-9 TrentonTrail J-9 Turquoise Circle D-7 Turquoise Point D-7 Turquoise Trail C -D,7 M V Va, Porge 3-9 Valley Ridge Drive- E-4 Valley View Drive North* B-7 Valley View Drive South* B-7 Viburnum Trail B-11 Vienna Lane 8-11 Vilas Lane G-2 V(ldmark Court G-10 Vildmark Drive G-10 Violet Lane F-5 W Walden Drive F-11 Walfrid Street F-9 Walnut Circle D-10 Walnut Court E-10 Walnut Lane D -E,10 Washington Drive F-5 Waterford Drive East I-10 Waterford Drive West I-10 Wedgwood Drive I-10 Wedgwood Lane North I-10 Wedgwood Lane South I-10 Wescott Hills Drive I-5 Wescott Road G-6, I,L-6 Wescott Square J-5 West Service Road G -2,H-1,2 West Wind Trail C-11 Westbury Drive H-7 Westbury Lane H-7 Westbury Path H-7 Whitetail Way K-10 Widgeon Way H,5-6 Wilderness Park Circle H-9 Wilderness Park Court H-9 Wilderness Run Circle G-10 Wilderness Run Court G-10 Wilderness Run Drive G-10 Wilderness Run Road G -L,10 Willow Way C-7 Windcrest Avenue G-7 Windcrest Court G-7 Windsor Court F-12 Windtree Circle K-6 Windtree Court K-6 Windtree Drive R-6 Witby Drive E-2 Wood Duck Circle E-9 Woodgate Court D-10 Woodgate Lane D -E,9-10 Woodgate Lane North D,9-10 Woodgate Point D-10 Woodlark Lane F-3 Wocdthrush Court H-6 Woodview* F-5 Woodview Avenue East• F-5 Woodview Avenue West• F-5 Wren Lane K-3 Wuthering Heights Road* B-6 X Y Yankee Doodle Court L-4 Yankee Doodle Lane* E-4 Yankee Doodle Road (C.R.28) D -L,4-5 Yorktown Place J-9 Z Zircon Lane B-8 Numbers 1st Street I-2 70th Street West K,L-2 Slat Street F-5 117th Street West K-12 120th Street West J-12 l�j Schools lO - Cedar School B-8 O2 - Metcalf Jr. High School A-9 O3 - Northview School I-8 4O - Pilot Knob Elem. School F-3 OS - Rahn School B-10 O6 - Thomas Lake School P-9 O7 - Trinity Lone Oak Lutheran -School R-2 Public Buildings 11 - Dakota County Library G-7 O2 - Dakota County Western Cour_ Facility B-11 13 - Driver Teat Center B-11 Eagan Municipal Center/ Police Department G-7 OS - Fire Department Administration c Community Room P-6 16 - Fire Station No. 1 C-7 O7 - Fire Station No. 2 I-2 18 - Fire Station No. 3 G-9 19 - Post Office I-2 ©0 - Post Office - Bulk Mail ® - Public Works Garage E-5 22 - Water Treatment Plant E - Churches ©6 - Beautiful Savior Church ©7 - Cedar Grove Baptist C-8 ZB - Christ Lutheran Church C 2® - Easter Lutheran Church C 30 - Catholic (Mary Mother of A-11 31 - Mt. Calvary Lutheran Ch; 32 - Peace Reform Church B-9 33 - St. John Neumann G-8 34 - Trinity Lone Oak Luthere Shopping Centers- Cedar entersCedar Cliff B-10 O2 - Cedarvale B-7 43 - Hilltop Plata G -B COUNTY H R A Serving People and Communities September 24, 1985 Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2496 - 145th STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4800 As you may recall, the HRA sought and received approval from the Eagan City Council earlier this summer to purchase additional scattered -site units in Eagan because we were unable to find additional, suitable properties in Lakeville, for whom our HUD funds were originally intended. Although we were able to purchase two properties in Eagan, the final result was that we recently found two newly -constructed twin homes in Lakeville that fit our program criteria and budget limitations. Therefore, of our 8 -unit funding originally for Lakeville, the following purchases were made: Lakeville - 5 units Eagan - 2 units Inver Grove Heights - 1 unit The HRA hopes to obtain additional funding next year to add to its scattered - site inventory in Eagan and some other communities, so we will hope to even- tually fulfill our new Cooperation Agreement with the City. If you have any questions on this, just give me a call. Sincerely, Sc ultz Executive Director CS:lz "AN Ff11IAI r1DDf1RTI INIITV FMN CWPP" V MINUTES METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING August 27, 1985 7:30 P.M. 6040 28th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 1. Call to Order, Roll Call. Chairman Walter Rockenstein called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and the secretary was asked to call the roll. The following members were present: Ben Griggs (R) Northwest Airlines Bob Johnson (R) Republic Airlines Marty Thon (R) Eastern Airlines Jack Spalding (A) United Airlines Bill Summers (R) USAir Rich Kidwell (R) Western Airlines Gary White (A) Midway Airlines Jeff Hamiel (R) Metropolitan Airports Commission Ron Glaub-(R) Minnesota Business Aircraft Association Art Tomes (A) Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce David Woodrow (R) St. Paul Chamber of Commerce John Richter (R) City of Minneapolis James Serrin (R) City of Minneapolis Walter Rockenstein (R) City of Minneapolis Steve Cramer (A) City of Minneapolis Scott Bunin (R) City of St. Paul Donald Fondrick (R) City of Richfield Robert Mood (R) City of Bloomington Mark Mahon (R) City of Bloomington Bernard Friel (R) City of Mendota Heights Tom Baker (R) City of Eagan Michael Brucciani (R) City of Burnsville Juan Rivas (A) City of Burnsville Martin Silvi (R) City of Inver Grove Heights 09 r MASAC Minutes Advisors Les Case Richard White Commissioner Barbara Ashley Darrell Weslander Joan Vandersloot Guests Steve Vecchi Mark Ryan Gordon Wagner Captain John Lindstrom J. K. Nelson Gene Wischmann Borys Polec Ray Dolny Ed Stahl C. E. Van Dyke Jon Hohenstein Carol Darling Don Witz J. Dalton Dot Dalton Lou Van Kuiken Pam Fuzzy Mrs. Frank Ario -2- August 27, 1985 Federal Aviation Administration Air Transport Association Metropolitan Airports Commission Technical Advisor Secretary Metropolitan Airports Commission Metropolitan Council City of Minneapolis Delta Airlines Bloomington FAA/Minneapolis Center Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis City of Eagan Minneapolis Richfield Richfield Richfield Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis 2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting_on July 23, 1985. The minutes of July 23, 1985 were approved as presented. 3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications. The following letters were received: 1) a letter indicating the resignation of Floyd Anderson as president of SMAAC and the assignation of Frank Ario as his replacement; 2) a letter to Commissioner Jan Del Calzo from Bernie Friel regarding her proposal to find incentives for quieter airplanes; and 3) a letter of resignation of an alternate representative from Burnsville, Bob O'Brien. Also referenced was an article in the Opportunity Workshop magazine highlighting one of the traffic count individuals. 4. Technical Advisor's Preferential Runway System Utilization Report and Complaint Summary Report. The reports for the month of July were presented by Darrell Weslander. MASAC Minutes -3- 5. Persons Wishing to Address the Council. August 27, 1985 Questions and comments were received from Borys Polec, Ray Dolny, Lou Van Kuiken and another resident from Minneapolis regarding the noise generated by overflights in their area. Les Case, FAA, and members of MASAC responded. Additionally, Georgette Ario reiterated the fact that SMAAC is becoming very angry and wants to know what it takes --what can they do to be effective in helping to solve the increasing problem. 6. Commissioner Del Calzo - Feasibility Study of Providing Locally Financed Incentives to Airlines for Replacement of Stage II Aircraft. Commissioner Del-Calzo was called upon to explain her proposal to MASAC. The objective of her Feasibility Study Request is to maximize the number of Stage III aircraft in use at MSP thereby reducing the noise impact. It is a study to deter- mine what level of incentive is needed to persuade airlines to invest in new planes. After the Commissioner's presentation, questions, comments and suggestions were received from the audience and councilmembers. 7. Minutes of MASAC Executive Committee, August 14, 1985. The minutes of the Executive Committee meeting on August 14 were presented by Walter Rockenstein. Because of the dramatic change in recent years, particularly in the number of operations at MSP, it was moved by Bob Johnson and seconded by Scott Bunin that MASAC review its gogis, re-examine its priorities and study what operational actions can be taken to meet the new problems The motion passed unanimously. Future MASAC meetings will be devoted to addressing this issue. 8. Discussion of Yearly Agenda Items. There was a brief discussion about certain recurring items on MASAC's agenda and it was suggested that these topics be placed at appropriate times throughout the year. January, Noise Abatement Plan Yearly Report; April, Summer Construction; July, Nighttime Survey; and December, Noise Abatement Budget and Capital Improvement Plan. 9. HNTB - Part 150 Land Use Compatabilit Roy Madgwick and Evan Futterman, HNTB, reviewed the draft presented in the August packet regarding the FAR Part 150 Study, Airport Noise Compatibility Program. The purpose of this study is to present documents in the appropriate language to the authorities in order to be eligible for funding. Questions and comments followed the discussion. /6 ! MASAC Minutes -4- August 27, 1985 10. 1985 Nichttime Survey Results. The 1985 Nighttime Survey was presented by Darrell Weslander. The survey was conducted by the college interns during a nine day period from July 6 through July 15. The total number of jet operations from 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. was 134. The average daily operation was down from 39.5 in 1984 to 31.3 in 1985. 11. Report of MASAC Representative to MAC Meeting on August 19, 1985. John Richter attended the MAC meeting on August 19 in the absence of Walter Rockenstein. Mr. Richter stated that he felt the most relevant issues were that the Commissioners were becoming more involved and interested in the noise problem than they had been previously and Commissioner Jan Del Calzo's proposal for a feasibility study' for incentives for airlines to purchase Stage III aircraft passed. 12. Other Items Not on Aqenda. Darrell Weslander gave a brief update of the Standard Instrument Departure off Runway 22, and Walter Rockenstein reviewed the N:O.I.S-.E. convention in Sparks, Nevada and the possibility of even newer technology --Stage IV equipment. Marty Thon, Eastern Airlines, passed out information about Eastern's A300 Air Bus which will offer special "red eye" service at MSP. He assured the council, however, that the departure and arrival times of the flights will not interfere with the nighttime restricted hours. Gordon Wagner, City of Minneapolis, requested information regarding the number of households in the various noise contours around the airport. He also asked if MASAC were interested in reviewing revisions in the airport systems manual. Both items were referred to the MASAC Legislative Committee. 13. Adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at 10:38 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Joan Vandersloot MASAC Secretary /tl 16-2,- 0 J w W a S = 2 da if1 l l _8 N S .o 7 1 en O **O ft's C p O J � z W — w O d'p O Z O J C a e z S�t z C`' as o ^ Q N I W --r ... Q 0""-T O M� N N a Q M N %O ^ Q N^ -• — tN ^ N N LA Cc I n v S S N f� a =Z O c V N V W d L J w W a S = 2 da if1 l l _8 N S .o 7 1 en O **O ft's C p O J � z W — w O d'p O Z O J C a e z S�t z C`' as o ^ Q N I W --r ... Q 0""-T O M� N Q M N %O ^ Q N^ -• — tN ^ N N LA Cc I n �� N S S N f� N C O c V N L p C m o+ Y R Y R C aa 47 C R O Qt N n C7 a J N N L c7 L •— > � R a V R R ^� O OLn al E E R 0. cC7 c R O L O O m a� C �+— .— » a �� v• of z z cG cn N cA V) +. w w U. — F i i i= � 10 t0 — LL- Y. L v CL J 71 v O CMCL � � y t 7 Ci ar 31 Cl �_ t v � I v O V� �► N C N N L O7 •- _ R 67 ` D J • r O a et a1 O t - C C u1 W co UA CIA z_ J ~ N Q C6 t1 0- 0000^010MOt11�00�ON\OaON —OI N N W --r ... Q 0""-T O M� N Q M N %O ^ Q N^ -• — tN N N LA Cc I n �� N S S M N f� N N L p C m o+ Y R Y R C aa 47 C R O Qt N n C7 a J Y,— L c7 L •— > � R a R R ^� O OLn al E E R 0. cC7 c R O L O O m a� C �+— .— » a �� v• of z z cG cn N cA V) +. w w U. — F i i i= Ea v N O V to � - V A L N I17 ++ N N M UN M N M �- ^ M S V � N Q C N^ ^SQi S I,r MMM 1 CD MSS M^ I r 1 MN .- M N M %Q N 1 N M co O 7� J � - L,L C N ^ N 1 1 1 I 1 N 1 I 1 1 1 ^ 1 1 N O O cz Z to t I i S C 3 N � u of V L S it I N S O I N M N NCO ^ N I I ^ S MS I N^ N ^^ M 1 S n CM N 'r C C O u u G t11 MMMO MSO 111 N'1� 1 SAO Q1MM LL1 C1 O12 M^ S N > OnS ^tl1�OG''01 ^ ^ ^ N L ^ ^ N ^ 4w L V C1 Q u S_ G1 - u L !� 1 N L L ^ u � L H W MCO MQ1 LRnN tl4M Qi%O ^ N O N O N N MQ1I�^MS n^O N N N M N N ^ N ^ ^ N %O M^ ^ N^ ^^ M M N ^ `l u z x I W N � u O C M OO � %O O ^ O1 N ^ S U.% ^ ^ tl\ M ^ M N N^ �O L!1 6f1 01%^ M^ n C1 00 S^ t� S �O Q1 M M N1 U A t.f� N M If N M M Ir �O S N^ N N S O ! e - Z U Q H O Gl UN M S tl\ %O a0 a% O ^ N F- +� N N N N N N N N N N M M ^ N MSt1%%OnOO MO ^^M^ -----O � ^ ^ v P AUGUST, 1985 NOISE COMPLAINTS by Category and Time of Day During August the following complaints were recorded: Category Number Percentaae Excessive Noise 610 56.0% Structural Disturbance _ 16 1.5% Activity Interruption 224 20.0% Nighttime Restricted Hours 74 7.0% Run -ups 4 •5% Ground Noise 9 .5% Low Flying 83 8.0% Secondary Airports 59 5.0% Miscellaneous 18 1.5% 1097 100.0% Time Number 2400 - 0559 32 0600 - 1159 341 1200 - 1559 210 1600 - 1959 232 2000 - 2359 168 CAP 114 1097 145 i association of . . U L L E 'T metropolitan municipalities September 17, 1985 TO: AMM Member Cities FROM: Vereterson, Executive Director RE: Metro olitan and AMM Activities of Importance 1. AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONFERENCE - OCTOBER -24, 1985: The AMM, Metropolitan Council and HUD are co -sponsoring a Conference on Affordable Housing on October 24, 1985. Conference information and registration materials will be mailed to you in the next few days by the Metro Council. ;As part of this conference, several awards will be presented to local units of government in recognition of accomplishments in providing affordable housing opportunities for low and moderate income families. Several weeks ago nomination forms citing criteria for the five award categories were mailed to your city by the Metropolitan Council and AMM. We would like to remind you of these awards and to encourage you to submit nominations In as many categories as applicable to your community's housing activities. The nominations must be submitted to the Metropolitan council no later than Friday= October_4, 1965. Please contact Robert Everling, Council Housing Planner, at 291-6378 if you have questions relative to the recognition award. 2. AMM METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE TASK FORCE The proposed Mall of America/Fantasyworld development in Bloomington has created a lot of excitement and interest in this state during the past several weeks and months as you well know. Along with the excitement and interest, a lot of question have been raised as to what impact this proposed 'development would have on the Metropolitan physical service systems and other metro policies and plans. Questions and issues relative to this.proposed development have dominated the recent AMM Outreach Breakfast meetings which have been held throughout the l6 -1- 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-5600 area in the last several weeks. A number of city 'officials have suggested and asked that the AMM, as the consensus building. organization for cities in the metro area, take a. look- at the issues involved with large proposed developments (public and private) that have obvious metropolitan significance. The AMM- Board of Directors in response to these suggestion has formed a Task Force of Board members to look at issues surrounding large developments of metropolitan significance and to make recommendations with respect to what kind of -role the AMM should play in "matters of metropolitan significance." The Task Force is chaired by Woodbury City Administrator, Jim Lacina, and will hold its initial meeting on September 26th. Please do not hesitate to contact either Jim or me- if you have questions, suggestions, etc. 3. MWCC RATE STRUCTURE STUDY NEARING COMPLETION: The study of the MWCC's rate structure which has been underway since May is nearing completion. The study is being conducted by Touche-Ross & Company under the direction of the Rate Structure Study Task Force which was appointed last Spring by the MWCC and consists of about 20 people representing local units of government and `metropolitan and state agencies. (The AMM is directly represented in the study by Barry Evans, Maplewood Manger; Jim Miller, Minnetonka Manager; Gloria Vierling, Shakopee Councilmember; and Vern Peterson, AMM Executive Director. Several other local officials are also members of the task force). As you may recall the rate structure study is major follow up effort to the Independent Management Study of the MWCC which was completed last winter. The rate structure study has several goals including a simplified cost allocation process, improve the stability and predictability of rates, minimize and reduce the level of rates, improve the overall financial integrity of the system, minimize and reduce the level of rates, etc. The Task Force is now looking at several alternatives rate setting methodologies and will be making its final recommendations in the next few weeks. The consultant and Task Force are also examining the Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) for fairness and equity. We will do our best to keep you informed in this matter since the MWCC costs and charges have long been a "bone of contention" for many local officials. Significant changes to the MWCC rate. setting methodology, like changes to aid formulas, tax rates, etc., are, likely to create "gainers and loosers" and you will want to be aware of potential impacts.on your city. 4. IMPACT OF THE FEDERAL FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT FLSA): The LMC has sent you several action alerts in recent weeks suggesting actions you might want to take with respect to this problem. I was impressed with the quality and effectiveness of the arguments put forth in a recent letter to Senator Boschwitz by Dave Childs, St. Anthony Manager. Attached is a copy of this letter and we would urge your city to consider similar action detailing the specific impacts that FLSA has on your city. 5. OUTREACH MEETINGS REPORT: Six AMM Outreach Breakfast meetings have been held (two more are scheduled) throughout the metro area as alluded to earlier in this Bulletin. These meetings originated in the recommedations of the Membership Services Committee and are designed to provide member city officials the direct opportunity to help establish the AMM Agenda and Work Program and to provide the AMM Board and Staff the opportunity to appraise member city officials of `major program and issue priorities as seen by the Board. Several issues including the Airport noise problem, the 1• AMM role in matters of metropolitan significance, and the AMM role in issues between cities and groups of cities have been added to the AMM action agenda as a result of these meetings. The attendance at these meetings has been a little on the disappointing side in some areas but a lot of favorable comments have been received from those who have attended. Representative from seven non-member cities have also attended these meetings. -3- 7 ai n thon illa er-.n�, Administrative Of/ices 3301 Silver Lake Road, St Anthony, Minnesota 55418 (612) 789-8881 I% September 10, 1985 Senator Rudy Boschwitz2107 Dirksen Office- Building Washington. 20510 Dear Senator Boschwitz, The St. Anthony City Council, at its recent meeting, instructed me to write to you with their concerns about the impact of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) on the cost of operations for our City. Lots of people have addressed the impact of the recent Garcia decision on cities in terms of -dollars. We estimate the costs for our City to be $20,000 to $40,000 annually. With the recent fiscal rape of cities by the insurance industry, this additional, unnecessary burden is indeed significant to our small City of 7,700 persons. More important to our situation, however, would be to take a few moments to describe in concrete, practical terms the provisions of the Act as they apply to our community, which are not only useless, but in many instances counterproductive: 1. The City of St. Anthony has seven full time and 30 reserve .volunteer) firefighters. We supplement our force by providing training to public works personnel to allow response during regular work hours. The full time firefighters work an average 56 hour shift. The FLSA requires that our personnel be paid overtime after 53 hours., We have adjusted to this portion of the law as follows: The hourly rate was reduced to provide 53 hours at regular rate and three hours at overtime rates, so that at the end of the year, the total annual pay for firefighters would be the same as previous to FLSA. The firefighters agreed with this change because they like their shift arrangement of 24 hours on duty followed by 48 hours off duty. The result, no change, except more work for the pay- roll clerk to keep track of all the overtime. Robert (Sob) Sundland. Mayor /D vid Childs City Manager :ouncilmembem Richard A. f-nrooth. Judy Makowske. George Marks Clarence Rinallo Senator Rudy Boschwitz September 10, 1985 Page 2 r� 2. The full time firefighters have traditionally been members of the volunteer fire department, which is part of the City, but has a separate association and governing board. Under FLSA, after hours response by full time firefighters (in their volunteer roles) would be at overtime rates rather than volunteer department call rates. -This is true also for certain City cus-todians and public works personnel who belong to the volunteer department. Because we cannot afford these extra costs, it is our only alternative that at least eight of our volunteers will have to be removed from the volunteer department, most of whom have 10-15 years service as volunteer firefighters. Because existing full time firefighters use their turn -out gear ($1,500- $2,000 per man) on the volunteer department, the City thuz faces the pronpaj:t of replacing - eight of our volunteers (if we can filld enough interested people) and, in addition, will aIL'u-nave the added expense of $12,000-$16,000 in turn -out gear. There will also be additional costs for the training of new members. This is absolutely ridiculous since the full time firefighters have chosen to be members of the volunteer department and are earning an additional pension. Thus, they are well rewarded for their efforts. W;iat has 'LSA accomplished by such an action? Nothing but more paper- work, lower morale, and less efficient operation of our Cit 3. The police, fire, and.othei City departments have a long - developed policy of granting compensatory time off (at 1h hours off per overtime hour worked). This is granted in lieu of overtime pay at the option of the employee. Most employees take the time rather than the extra pay because they want the extra time for hunting, fishing, or family activities. At the same time, the City benefits because we can give the time when our schedules are most benefited by it. Because it is a cooperative effort, both the employee and the taxpayer benefit from the practice. Under the FLSA, the employee and the taxpayer both lose. 4. One of the areas most effected by the comp, time provisions is in the area of training. Employees attending a one or two day training session, are happy to go in exchange for comp, time off because the City pays for their educational expense. Because of this arrangement, our police, fire, and other personnel are highly trained and have a high level of motivation and enthusiasm for their jobs. Changes in this situation will make training more expensive to cities and ultimately less available to staff. The cumula- tive effect is higher cost, lower training levels and loss of motivation and enthusiasm. We have dedicated public servants in St. Anthony and we are proud of their attitude and ability. We have faced rising costs and 116 Senator Rudy Boschwitz September 10, 1985 Page 3 and declining sources of -revenues and will continue to face such troubles. We have kept our enthusiasm high as we pulled together as a unit, trying to keep a high level of city services by finding innovative ways of providing services, reducing costs and enhancing revenues. We are not abusing our employees and feel that the FSLA provisions previously discussed serve only to damage rather than enhance the situation for.all parties involved. We urge you to support legislation similar to S.1570 unless the Department of Labor can produce evidence -of wholesale abuses by cities against their employees. If such is the case, perhaps changes in laws can be made to address those problems without imposing spurious and inappropriate legislation on those of us who have not abused the system and who have arrived at acceptable practices through longstanding collective bargaining efforts. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this critical matter. Sincerely, t DM.3� e t' _ David M. Childs City Manager DMC/c j k cc: /Association of Metropolitan Municipalities League of Minnesota Cities National League of Cities September 12, 1985 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Box 2199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Attention: Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Public Works Director Re: Seneca Plant Odors/Related Your Letter of September 6, 1985 Dear Mr. Colbert: Thank you for bringing the problem of continuing odors to my direct attention. Following the recent odor complaints which you refer to in your letter, I instructed representatives of the MWCC Administrative, Operations and Engineering staff to meet and determine what additional, immediate steps might be taken to reduce sewage odors at the Seneca Plant. As a result of that meeting, certain operational changes have been made. These are: 1) Prechlorination of the raw sewage to reduce odors at the grit chambers and at the primary tanks. 2) Operation of three aeration tanks rather than two to increase aeration capacity and to reduce odors from the secondary process. 3) Elimination of the use of one of the sludge thickening tanks to reduce odors from this source. In addition to these immediate steps, we will also be looking into the use of odor masking agents. Regarding the longer term, we are now beginning the process of selecting an engineering consultant to determine capital improvements which will be required in the near future. Alternative capital improvements for odor control will also be included as part of this study. We are very interested in knowing whether you have noticed some reduction in odor complaints in the past few weeks. If you have, then we feel the substantial increase in operating costs due to prechlorination are justifiable. Sincerely yours, Louis J. Breimhurst Chief Administrator fav 350 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-222-8423 -z - ICG :mg cc: Bea Blomquist, Mayor of Eagan . ,,Aomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Sandra Gardebring, Chairman, Metropolitan Council John Almo, Director of Operations, MWCC James Wawra, Seneca Plant Superintendent Bruce Baumann, MWCC Commissioner Peter Meintsma, Chairman, MWCC 173 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 September 6, 1985 in Mr. Louis Breimhurst, Chairman Metropolitan Waste Water Control Metro Square Building St. Paul MN 55101 BEA BLOMQUIST SMITH EGAN NO. —' , r I THOMAS A. SMIT � 'Y" JAMES H JERRY THOMAS P, E P LY �' : ` THE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Admirrstrotor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk CommissionFIiF RE: SENECA WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT/OBJECTION TO OPERATIONAL OWNERS Dear Mr. Breimhurst: I have been requested by the Mayor to inform you of the continuing odor problems that the City of Eagan is experiencing as a result of the operation of the Seneca Waster Water Treatment Plant. We have been receiving several complaints pertaining to odors emitting from this facility. On Monday, August 19, the odors being referred to were of a sulfur and diesel nature and on Monday, August 26, the diesel odor was again very strong and objectionable. The City has continued to express objections to the odors emitting from this plant for the past several years and will continue to demand that appropriate corrective actions be taken immediately to alleviate this intolerable ongoing situation. Our Mayor and representatives of City staff have had several meetings with representatives from the Metropolitan Waste Water Control Commission in trying to resolve this problem, however, it continues to occur. We would sincerely appreciate any effort that you could provide in helping to. expedite corrective measures necessary to eliminate this problem. Sincerely, 14-n"'Aa) ,'�- ��l� . Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. / Public Works Director cc: Bea Blomquist, Mayor Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Mr. Harry Grounds, MWCC Process Engineer Mr. Jim Warwa, Seneca Plant Superintendent Sandra Gardebring, Chairman of the Metropolitan Council TAC/db 1 7� THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY METROPOUTAn �- conTROL commiffion Twin Cities Area September 25, 1985 Mayor Beatta Blomquist City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RIE: MWCC Septage Management Program Dear Mayor Blomquist: In follow-up to our telephone conversation of September 18, I wish to briefly explain the proposed MWCC Septage Management Program and the disposal site selection issue with regard to Eagan. The MWCC Industrial Waste Section has been involved in the whole issue of waste transport haulers, disposal sites, dumping fees, etc. since 1982 when a "MWCC Community Questionnaire" was mailed out to all communities served by MWCC. A variety of other acitvities subsequently occurred (such as issuing temporary "Permits" to haulers), and in 1983 a Septage Management Committee was f6rmed. A draft Septage Management Study report was prepared and adopted by the Commission for public meeting purposes in August, 1984. The two main objectives of this program are to designate approved septage disposal sites and to implement a uniform user charge system. Information regarding the proposed program and the public meetings was mailed to all communities served by the MWCC during the September 1984 to January 1985 period. Preparation of a final Septage Management Program document is currently underway, and adoption is anticipated before the end of 1985. As mentioned previously, a major goal of this effort is to designate ap- proved Waste Transport Hauler disposal sites. The sites chosen must meet MWCC criteria and also be accepted by the community in which they are located. One MWCC criterion is that all disposal sites must be tributary to one of the four regional MWCC treatment plants. Therefore, disposal sites must be within the service areas of the Metropolitan, Blue Lake, Seneca or Empire plants. Approved disposal sites, to be included in the final Septage Management Program, are currently in use or will be established at or near the Metropolitan, Blue Lake and Empire treatment plants. In the Seneca plant service area, two disposal sites are in use, but neither one of them meets the necessary criteria to be utilized as approved sites. In addition, the communities involved (Burnsville and Bloomington) have requested in writing that the existing sites be closed, and that an approved disposal site be established at or near the Seneca treatment plant. These requests were considered to be valid and logical, since establishing a disposal site at or near the Seneca plant would be consistent with MWCC actions regarding the other three regional treatment plants. In addition, a check of the City of Eagan response 175 350 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-222-8423 Mayor Beatta Blomquist September 25, 1985 Page Two to the "MWCC Community Questionnaire" revealed no opposition to locating a disposal site in Eagan, and in. fact mention was made of an interceptor site near the Seneca plant as a recommended location for a septage disposal site. Earlier this year, inspections were made of manholes near the Seneca plant, and it appears that suitable manholes exist which could be utilized. The concept of community approval of the Waste Transport Hauler disposal sites is very important to the MWCC. It is also important, however, that the MWCC carry out its responsbility to serve all Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS) users in the Metropolitan area. This includes homeowners with septic systems that utilize the MDS by having their systems pumped and subsequently discharged by Waste Transport Haulers. The communities served by the Seneca plant, including Eagan, still have a significant number of septic systems in use. These communities, as well as nearby unsewered areas, have a need for a convenient disposal site for septage. The lack of a convenient disposal site can lead to adverse environmental impacts, such as indiscriminate discharges of septage or inadequate on-site system maintenance by homeowners due to ex- cessive pumping costs. Given the above considerations, it is the MWCC's in- tention to establish an approved Waste Transport Hauler disposal site at or near the Seneca treatment plant. Your concern with this idea, due to odor problems which have been associated with the Seneca plant in the recent past, is understandable. It is felt, however, that using the Seneca area for a disposal site would not ca.use increased odor problems for the following reasons: the Seneca plant currently receives septage from the two existing sites; the final Industrial Discharge Permits to be issued to the Waste Transport Haulers will contain specific conditions to regulate site use so that discharge acti- vities are carried out in a proper manner; the City of Eagan will have control over site use via the Disposal Site Use Form as described in the proposed MWCC Septage Management Program, and MWCC personnel will routinely maintain the site for cleanliness, etc. In addition, Industrial Waste Section personnel will routinely check the site to insure that only permitted haulers use the site, and to verify that only acceptable material is being discharged. I hope this letter serves to explain and clarify the MWCC position on this matter. Due to time restraints, it is unlikely that the use of a Seneca plant disposal site for septage will be pursued until after final adoption of the MWCC Septage Management Program. Therefore, at some future time (possibly early 1986), the City of Eagan will again be contacted regarding this issue. If you have any questions or comments at the present time, please contact me at 222-8423. Thank you. Sincerely, , '1A Donald R. Madore Acting Director of Quality Control DRM:rw cc: L. J. Breimhurst J. A. Almo L. H. Hermes to league of minnesota cities MEMORANDUM September 13, 1985 TO: Third Congressional District Mayors, Managers, Administrators, Clerks FROM: Mayor -Mary Anderson, Golden Valley Mayor Connie Morrison, Burnsville SUBJECT: COMMUNICATIONS WITH CONGRESSMAN FRENZEL ON FEDERAL TAX REFORM The League of Minnesota Cities has coordinated our Third District efforts to inform Congressman Frenzel of our concerns about the loss of deductibility of state and local taxes on federal income tax returns and the reduction and possible loss of tax exempt financing authority for cities. Both these issues arose as a result of federal tax reform proposals now under active consideration in Congress. On August 19, mayors and/or managers and administrators from Golden' Valley, Burnsville, Lakeville, Minnetonka, and Northfield met to discuss these matters and to determine how best to communicate our concerns to Congressman Frenzel during the Congressional recess then in progress. Three major activities were agreed upon at that • meeting: first, we would send a letter outlining our position on state -local tax deductibility and the tax-exempt status of municipal bonds over the signatures of as many mayors from Third District cities as possible; second, mayors were asked to write individual letters on the matter on behalf of each city; and third, we would schedule a meeting with Congressman Frenzel before the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee began "mark-up" of the tax reform legislation. Congressman Frenzel was unable to meet directly with a delegation of mayors during the recess period. We endeavored and were able to schedule a meeting with him and Diane Oberhelman, Frenzel's Tax Legislative Assistant, in Washington, on Monday, September 99 just a week ago. The Mayors of Golden Valley, Burnsville, and Eagan, plus the City Manager of Minnetonka and Donald Slater, LMC Executive Director, attended that important meeting. After our discussions with Congressman Frenzel and Diane Oberhelman, we all felt the extra effort of the trip to Washington was well worth our time and attention. Congressman Frenzel is now directly aware of our concerns on these matters of importance to cities. He is knowledgeable about the negative effects of the loss of deductibility on Third District cities. He understands the need for cities to retain tax-exempt financing authority for public purposes and the ver 1 80 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (612)227-5600 real and difficult problems posed by the suggestions that a 1, 2 or 3 percent -rule be required for limiting private benefit. Congressman Frenzel has scheduled a meeting with cities in the Third District for Tuesday, September 24 9:00 - 11:00 a.m., at the Decathalon Club in the Olympic Room. We urge all city officials who are able to attend to do. so. It is very important to pressthese concerns and to carry on a dialogue with regard to tax reform ro osals that affect cities. While in Washington, we also had the opportunity to meet with an aide to Senator Boschwitz, Tim Bergan. Bergan is a Legislative Assistant to the Senator. We were also able to convey our information and concerns to him and to let the Senator know how current tax reform proposals could damage cities. At our initial meeting of -August 19, it was decided that if a trip to Washington, D.C., was made by city officials from the Third Congressional District, we would ask all the cities in the district 0 aid in paying for the costs of airfare. (LMC will cover the cost o. Don Slater's airfare. One official was able to fly on a pass.) That means we are asking your city to help pay for three plane fares at $580 each. (The fare was charged because no discount seats were available and because reservations were made less than a week prior to departure because of the need to make the trip before private negotiations on the tax legislation began.) The following schedule of payments has been proposed in order to schedule payments among all 42 cities reflecting the differences in population among the cities: Population 249 or less 250 - 4,999 59000 - 99999 10,000 - 19,999 20,000 - 49,999 Donation $35 $55 $65 $70 $80 Cities Coates New Trier Carver Medicine Lake Cologne New Germany Hamburg Norwood Jordan Randolph Mayer Savage Vermillion Victoria Waconia Watertown Young America Chanhassen Prior Lake Shakopee Chaska Rosemount Eden Prairie Hastings Apple Valley Burnsville Crystal Eagan / X Hopkins Lakeville Inver Grove Hts. Northfield Edina Golden Valley Minnetonka New Hope Plymouth S. St. Paul St. L. F 'k 50,000 - 2999999 $95 Bloomington If your city is willing to contribute to cover airfare costs of the meeting with Congressman.Frenzel, please send donations to the League of Minnesota Cities. Checks may be made payable to the League. / 19 HAUGE, Smrm & EIDE, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE lt]nFAKWX,i Lori M. Bellin Mr. Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Office Staff Dear Tom: September 23, 1985 AREA CODE 812 TELEPHONE 454-4224 We thought it would be well to update both you and the City Council concerning staff changes in our office that have taken place in recent months. The principal change has been that Brad Smith decided several weeks ago that he would be leaving the office and get into a somewhat different setting in the law practice. Although we were very surprised and sad to hear of Brad's decision to leave because of his long tenure, Dave Keller who was with us for about 5 years will be coming back effective October 1, 1985. In addition, several months ago we hired Lori Bellin, who has been out of law school somewhat over two years, to do general civil work for us. Ralph Corey, who joined us in the fall of 1984 decided this summer that he wanted to get out of the private law practice and has joined the Navy, Judge Advocate General's Corps and is now stationed in Rhode Island. In his place we hired Mike Mayer, a recent law school graduate who has taken the July 1985 bar examination, and is expected to be admitted in mid-October. Although there appear to be some fairly substantial changes internally, we feel we have a very solid staff that will be able to expand our focus and services substantially. Dave Keller and I will be handling civil work for the City, including City Council, Planning Commission, zoning, assessments, condemnation and other miscellaneous civil work, with Kevin Eide and Mike Mayer handling the prosecution. As you may know, Dave Keller has been practicing independently in the Eagan area for the past year and we are happy to have him back with us. Lori practiced in Minneapolis before joining us, is a Burnsville resident and her husband is moving his business to Burnsville shortly. Mike is currently serving as a Dorm Head at Hamline University during the school year of 1985-86 and we expect that he will be moving to the Eagan area next summer, after getting married. /Sd s Mr. Thomas Hedges September 23, 1985 Page 2 One problem we have is that our building is becoming somewhat crowded and we have been looking at new quarters but haven't made a definite decision yet on the new location. With these changes, we hope to continue serving the City in an efficient and productive manner. I'd be happy to detail our status if you have any questions. PHH:ras V tuly yours, HAUG., SMITH & EIDE, P.A. r� Paul H. Hauge