Loading...
12/03/1985 - City Council RegularTENTATIVE AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL DECEMBER 3, 1985 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE �p I II. - MRPA AWARD I� III. - METROPOLITAN REPRESENTATIVE MARY MARTIN IV. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES -11-V. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Fire Department C. Park & Recreation Department B. Police Department D. Public Works Department VI. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA .3 A. �5 B. I C. E. P'q G. H. K. 1J, AIL . Contractor Licenses Final Payment, Contract 85-14, Parks Spring Construction for Central Landscape Change Order #1, City Project #85-24 in the Amount of $1,745 Cooperative Purchasing Agreement for City Vehicles Project 455, Present Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Deerwood Drive) Contract #85-17, Final Payment/Acceptance (1984 Sealcoating) Project 457, Easement Acquisition/Payment (Wells #8 & 9) Contract 84-06, Final Payment/Acceptance (1984 Sealcoating) Final Plat Approval, Royal Oaks 2nd Addition (Asp Construction) Final Plat Approval, Lexington Square 2nd Addition (Meritor Development) Vacate Public Right -of -Way (Blue Gentian Road), Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing Final Payment, Contract 485-6, Golden Meadow Road - Streets & Utilities) Ceca Utilities, Inc. VII. 7:00 - PUBLIC BEARINGS -�.IS5 A. Public Hearing for Consideration of Proposed Housing Policy Report of the Dakota County Housing & Redevelopment Authority B. Public Hearing for Consideration of the Dakota County Housing & Redevelopment Authority Issuance of $10,000,000 in Revenue Bonds for a First -Time Homebuyer Program C. Public Hearing to Consider Final Resolution to the $12,580,000 11 Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond/Royal Oak Circle Project 41iD. Public Hearing for Project 454, Asbury Road - Streets & Utilities �3 E. Public Hearing for Project 443, O'Neill's Pond - Trunk Storm �Sewer Outlet PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) F. Public Hearing for Project 450, William & LaRue 1st & 2nd Additions - Sanitary Sewer p� G. Public Hearing for Project 448R, Pond LP 55 & 55A - Storm Sewer r Outlet VI. OLD BUSINESS 71 0 A. Group W/Update 41.B. Authorization to Proceed with Public Works Facilities Expansion VII. NEW BUSINESS -P.49 A. Annual Review of Planned Unit Developments I� 50 B. Request for Extension of Eagan 40 Planned Development (Dan Dolan - Located at Intersection of Cliff & Thomas Lake Roads) C. Dakota County Plat I, Correction to Recorded Boundary Description (Dakota County Surveyor) 51 D. Preliminary Plat Revision of Town Centre 70 2nd Addition (Federal Land Company) Located in Part of the NW 1/4 of Section 15, South of Yankee Doodle Road and West of Denmark Avenue E. Preliminary Plat for Office/Retail Shopping Center, Norwest 3rd Addition (Pat Ryan) Located in Part of the SW 1/4 of Section 10, NE Quadrant of Yankee Doodle & Pilot Knob Roads F. Conditional Use Permit for an Advertising Sign (Naegle Outdoor Advertising) Located on Osman Temple Property in Part of the NE 1/4 of Section 4, Near Highway 13 & I-494 •�, �.3 G. Contract 85-5, Request for Extended Hours of Operation (Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer) p•�3 H. Preliminary Plat for an Office/Warehouse for Yorkton Development 1 located on SE 1/4 of Section 13 73 I. Final Resolutions for Yorkton I & Yorkton II Industrial Revenue Bonds �3 J. Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition, Preliminary Plat (Replat) of / Eagandale Office Park, Lots 2, 3 & 4, Block 2, Located in the NE 1/4 of Section 3, Corporate Center Drive & Trapp Road VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS -p.$0 A. Construction Fund Transfers I%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT 13 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1985 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval is given to the November 12, 1985, minutes of a Special Joint Meeting of the Eagan APC and City Council, the regular minutes of the November 19, 1985, regular City Council meeting and the minutes of the November 21, 1985, Special City Council meeting, action is in order to consider the agenda for the December 3, 1985, City Council meeting. .MRPA-r.AW- ARD: Recently, Roger Martin, Chairman of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission, and Carolyn Thurston, its vice -chair, were recipients of a special MRPA Award. A representative of the MRPA will be present at 6:30 this coming Tuesday to make a brief, but formal, presentation of the Award to both Roger and Carolyn. There is no action to be considered on this item. Our Metropolitan Council Representative, Mary Martin, was unable to attend the November 19, 1985, City Council meeting due to a conflict in her scheduling. Mary is planning to attend Tuesday night's meeting and will discuss issues that are pertaining specifically to barge movement on the Minnesota River and metro- politan impact relating to the proposed mega -mall to be located in the city of Bloomington. Other questions relating to the Metropolitan Council are certainly in order for discussion by the City Council. Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Two TIM DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. FIRE DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered under Fire Department at this time. B. POLICE DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered under Police Department at this time. C. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered under Parks & Recreation Department at this time. D. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered under Public Works Department at this time. y 540 Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Three There are twelve (12) items on the agenda referred to as Consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTOR LICENSES A. Contractors License -- Attached on pageis a list of contractors who are renewing or who have been selected and retained as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside in Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipalities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the contractors license as presented. PERSONNEL ITEMS B. Personnel Items -- There are no Personnel Items for considera- tion by the Council. 3 CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES DECEMBER 3, 1985 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1. ACTION COURTS INC 2. BRANCALE CONSTRUCTION INC 3. FREIGHTMASTERS INC 4. MERLE'S CONSTRUCTION CO 5. PRESTIGE DEVELOPERS INC 6. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION PLUMBERS 1. BUDGET PLUMBING 2. COKLEY PLBG 3. K & K PLBG & HTG 4. LUNDGREN BROS PLBG 4 Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Four FINAL PAYMENT/CONTRACT 85-14 B. Final Payment, Contract 85-14, Parks Spring Construction for Central Landscape -- Final payment is in order for consideration to Central Landscaping, Inc., in the amount of $25,393.98. The City's Director of Parks & Recreation is extremely pleased with the work that was performed by Central Landscaping, Inc., and is recommending that the City accept perpetual maintenance and make the final payment to that contractor as specified. Please refer to a memo outlining the final payment referenced as page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final payment and accept perpetual maintenance for Contract 84-14. OR' MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR VRAA DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 SUBJECT: FINAL PAYMENT - CONTRACT 85-14, CENTRAL LANDSCAPING INC., SPRING PARK CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT Central Landscaping has completed all work associated with this project and acceptance by the City is in order. Original Contract $476,837.05 Change Order 19,192.12 Revised Contract Amount $496,029.17 Total Payment 454,698.61 Final Payment and Retainage $ 25,393.98 For Council Action: To accept the parks under Contract 85-14 for perpetual maintenance and make final payment of $25,393.98. /s/ Ken Vraa Director of Parks & Recreation KV/kf Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Five CHANGE ORDER #1, CITY PROJECT 85-24 C. Change Order #1, City Project 85-24 in the Amount of $1,745 --The Director of Parks & Recreation is recommending a change order to provide payment to People's Electric Contractors for costs incurred for additional materials and labor on improvement contract 85-24 for lighting of athletic fields at -Goat Hill and Ridge Cliff Parks. This work includes added trenching and placement of a 4 -inch conduit under an existing 8' bituminous trail, with the addition of concrete pads and oversizing of an electrical service panel for the baseball field at Goat Hill Park. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to City Project 85-24 in the amount of $1,745 to People's Electric Contractors. COOPERATIVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR CITY VEHICLES D. Cooperative Purchasing Agreement for City Vehicles --There were 5 automobiles approved in the 1986 Budget for use as City pool cars by Departments located at the City Hall. The City is able to purchase through the Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Agreement Chevrolet Celebrities in the amount of $9,848 with vehicle rust proofing at $110 each, for a total price of $9,958. This action is being requested of the City Council prior to January 1 due to the fact that bids are only effective until December 9 under the Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing arrange- ment. Technically the City has not formally adopted the 1986 Budget, however, purchase of these vehicles were authorized by direction given to the City Administrator for final preparation and develop- ment of the 1986 operating budget which will be considered at the next regular City Council meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider an appropriation for suppling five vehicles for the City of Eagan through the Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Agreement to Viking Chevrolet in the amount of $9,958 for Chevrolet Celebrities. 7 Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Six FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/DEERWOOD DRIVE E. Project 455, Present Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Deerwood Drive) -- In response to a petition received from Independent School District #196, a feasibility report has been prepared for the proposed upgrading of Deerwood Drive from Lexington Avenue to I -35E in anticipation of the new proposed elementary school site to be located along this segment. This feasibility report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to be held January 21, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 455 (Deerwood Drive - Streets and Utilities) and schedule the public hearing to be held January 21, 1986. FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/1985 SEAL COATING F. Contract 85-17, Final Payment/Acceptance (1985 Seal Coating) -- The final inspections in compliance with the specifications for the above -referenced contract have now been completed and is in :order for formal acceptance and authorization of final payment to the contractor for the seal coating program performed in 1985. Due to the fact that an overpayment was discovered to the same contractor for the City's seal coating performed under Contract 84-6, this final payment reflects a deduct for the previous overpayment of $3,211..77. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the second and final payment for Contract 85-17 (1985 seal coating) in the amount of $5,642.67 to Allied Blacktop and accept this improve- ment for perpetual maintenance. 61 Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Seven EASEMENT ACQUISITION/PAYMENT WELLS #8 & #9 G. Project 457, Easement Acquisition/Payment (Wells #8 & #9) -- With- the proposed development of Wells #8 and #9 under Project 457, it is necessary to acquire the appropriate easements for the water transmission lines as well as the site location for the pumphouse and wells. In accordance with our Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan, the appropriate location for Wells #8 and #9 are within the proposed Royal Oaks 2nd Addition as a part of our main well field development. Through the coopera- tion of the developer of the proposed Royal Oaks 2nd Addition, the City was able to negotiate the acquisition of all permanent and temporary construction easements for this facility in the amount of $4,000. Payment for the acquisition of 0.49 acres of permanent easement and 0. 25 acres of temporary easement is in accordance with the City's acquisition rates for easements and rights-of-way which are above the typical requirements of subdivision development. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the payment of $4,000 for the acquisition of easements for Project 457 (Wells #8 and #9) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/1984 SEAL COATING H. Contract 84-6, Final Payment/Acceptance (1984 Seal Coating) -- In researching the appropriate files, it was discovered that a final payment and .formal acceptance for the 1.984 seal coating program has never been officially processed. It has also been discovered that the contractor was inadvertently paid for the final street sweeping operations which were performed by Public Works Maintenance personnel. Due to the fact that this contract provided for a specific cost associated with this operation, an overpayment has been accurately defined in the amount of $3,211.77. This overpayment has been deducted from the final payment for Contract 85-17 due to the fact that the same contractor held both contracts. Subsequently, it is necessary for formal Council action to approve the final payment reflecting the deduct and to formally accept the project for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the second and final payment for Contract 84-6 incorporating a deduct of $3,211.77 to be applied to the final payment for Contract 85-17 and to accept the project for perpetual maintenance. Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eight FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/ROYAL OAK CIRCLE Z Final Plat Approval, Royal Oak Circle 2nd Addition (Asp Con- struction Company, Inc.) --We have received an application for final plat approval for the 2nd phase development of the Royal Oak Circle multifamily development complex being constructed of the Surrey Heights Addition and west of Federal Drive. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval of December 18, 1984, have been complied with and all final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. Enclosed on page is a copy of the proposed final plat. ACTION TO BE for the Royal and City Clerk CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat Oak Circle 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor to execute all related documents. /d Rod 0 ■ mss;= a ��a � i �; • r 0 n � + �-- �■y t .� =�� � :7 it ij -C IdNW a� S 0.20.37• Y I. gu •� 173.00 s 0.20.37• _ 239.96 I I } a-9oroo8 6o0oJ•9 338.. w o�� IA 41 ■1 yaO i . ._ . • it � -i z0 -r, • Wy `i 0 wrs . •. / ..ww r b q m p `•�• • • O 1 b —C— x A W ti O r J zz W m ZC r p b M 0'20.37• E 243.00 C4 ~r � tee: it 8� �■. b 46 I� O .Ob 7. •%l �> - SWI mo. e N 0-22'31• M _ "'� ■Jln•nl•-�/�:-n A .fir-r;n rlS-r+r-nIT •.... 43 VI II VIYI_—�/I /. L/L_I /-111 Yll_IVI i [7�; It U+�f)�-�Tlr\.1 ;71 X17- /fir YIi4V UI A, NIO \/I- Y�11 V11=1\\/IY IUI 1 •/I- L-F+I=Y v. r T L T W m . N - a = m t- m r' 0 ■ O ri m Zi Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Nine FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, LEXINGTON SQUARE 2ND ADDITION J Final Plat Approval, Lexington Square 2nd Addition (Meritor Development) --We have received an application for final plat approval for the second phase development of the Lexington Square Addition located south of Wescott Road and east of Lexington Avenue. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval of March 22, 1984, have been complied with. In addition, all final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. Enclosed on page 1,3 is a copy of the proposed final plat. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Lexington Square 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. "i traA4.0ra'r 3Swaar rwy *i— *_ xLt ire 4.'4.V pw.m dol t –! %t r_�•:: 46 jjIts It k• L -{s}icS =•sill r� a ''.�i... :wv . Es�..lticFt t•t :t�I C.It. ;c if ter: ;. • r .. � � !t 6 i C1.1 •'` ' -- a �� r � -_•t;�- '� �i�-��=�i:!]-'_jj$ j I� =x .�....�...t rs r s 1 r� 0 C4 1p4 ►m w 'Agenda Information Nemo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Ten VACATE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY/BLUE GENTIAN ROAD K. Vacate Public Right -of -Way (Blue Gentian Road), Receive Peti- tion/Order Public Hearing --We received a petition to vacate that portion of Blue Gentian Road lying west of T.H. 149 which was relocated due to the construction of I-494. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition requesting the vacation of public right-of-way (Blue Gentian Road) and schedule the public hearing to be held January 7, 1986. FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/GOLDEN MEADOW RD. L. Contract 85-6, Final Payment/Acceptance (Golden Meadow Road - Streets & Utilities) -- We have received a request for final payment for the above -referenced contract from our consulting engineering firm along with a certification of compliance with City approved plans and specifications for the installation of streets and utilities along Golden Meadow Road. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and the project has been determined to be ready for final acceptance and perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the fourth and final payment for Contract 85-6 (Golden Meadow Road) in the amount of $14,084.73 to Ceca Utilities, Inc., and accept for perpetual maintenance. Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eleven CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED HOUSING POLICY REPORT A. Public Hearing for Consideration of Proposed Housing Policy Report of the Dakota County Housing & Redevelopment Authority -- In order for the City Council to consider a specific revenue bond program for a first-time home buyer, regulations have been enacted by Congress that require consideration of a proposed policy report of the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. According to federal statutes, a public hearing must be held by the City of Eagan to consider a proposed policy report of the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority as the entity authorized the issue of qualified mortgage bonds on behalf of the City and other cities in Dakota County. The Notice of Public Hearing is to be published by the mayor of the city, among others, and contain a statement of the policies regarding housing, development and low income housing assistance to be followed by the Authority's issuing qualified mortgage bonds and mortgage credit certificates. Essentially, the proposed policy report concludes that the HRA has complied during the 1 -year period preceding this report with the intent of Congress that the HRA use its authority to issue qualified mortgage bonds and mortgage credit certificates to the greatest extent feasible to assist lower income families in affording home ownership before assisting higher income families. A policy statement report is a good -faith audit on the part of the City of the County's HRA, which becomes the issuing authority. It has been the City staff's observation that the HRA does make every effort to provide mortgages to assist lower income families and, therefore, is in compliance with requirements of the Internal Revenue Code causing their policy report to be consistent. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: After opening the public hearing and considering any public input, a motion is in order to consider a resolution_ certifying that the Dakota County HRA is in conformance with the intent of their policy report. Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twelve HOMEBUYER PROGRAM/$10,000,000 REVENUE BONDS B. Public Hearing for Consideration of the Dakota County Housing & Redevelopment Authority Issuance of $10,000,000 in Revenue Bonds for a First -Time Homebuyer Program -- The City has been given an opportunity through the Dakota County Housing & Redevelop- ment Authority to again provide mortgages available to first-time homebuyers that are lower than the market rate. This is made possible by issuing tax exempt bonds according to a program that has been established by the Dakota County Housing & Redevelop- ment Authority. The restrictions that were placed in the first-time homebuyer pro ram document, a copy is enclosed for your review on pages through 3,49 1 are the same restrictions that were place in the 1981 program. Please review pages 12-20 (page numbers of the document) for a specific reference to the criteria of the program. These pages discuss the amount of monies available to make mortgage loans for first-time homebuyers, how the mortgage loans are structured, the formula for adjusted gross income and several other criteria. Mr. Mark Ulfers and a representative of Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc., will be present to answer any questions regarding the program. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To tion for the Dakota County Housing to issue $10,000,000 in revenue bonds program. 14 approve or deny authoriza- & Redevelopment Authority for a first-time homebuyer FOR THE CITY OF EAGAN 1985 SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND PROGRAM October, 1985 SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF EAGAN Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act"), authorizes a city, or a housing and redevelopment authority designated by and acting on behalf of a city to develop and administer programs of making or purchasing mortgage loans to finance the acquisition, by low and moderate income persons and families, of single family housing located anywhere within its boundaries. The City of Eagan (the "City") has by ordinance authorized the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority) to exercise on behalf of the City all powers conferred on the City pursuant to Minnesota Statute, sections 462C.01 through 462C.07, provided that the City reserved the right to hold public hearings required by the Act and to approve any housing plan or program prior to submission to either the Metropolitan Council or the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. In creating this single family housing finance program for the City, the City Council has found and determined that the preservation of the quality of life in the City is dependent upon the maintenance and provision of adequate, decent, safe and sanitary housing stock; that accomplishing the provision of such housing stock is a public purpose and will benefit the residents of the City; that a need exists within the City to provide in a timely fashion additional affordable housing to .. - ... - - .. � .. � ..... , r .. a ... , - p•, , persons of low and moderate income residing and expected to reside in the City; that a need exists for mortgage credit to be made available for both existing housing and for the new construction of additional single family housing; and that many owners of single family housing units are unable to sell such units and would-be purchasers of single family housing units either cannot afford mortgage credit at the market rate of interest or cannot obtain mortgage credit because the mortgage market is severely restricted. The Authority, in preparing this housing finance program on behalf of the City, has considered the information contained in the Housing Plan of the City, including particularly (i) the availability and affordability of other government housing programs; (ii) the availability and affordability of private market financing for the acquisition of existing and newly constructed single family housing units; (iii) an analysis of population and employment trends and projections of population and employment needs; (iv) recent housing trends and future housing needs in the City; and (v) an analysis of how the program will meet the needs of low and moderate income persons and families residing and expected to reside in the City. The Authority has further considered (i) the amount, timing and manner of sale of bonds to finance the estimated amounts of mortgage loans to be made under the program, to fund the appropriate reserves and to pay the costs of issuance; (ii) the number and qualifications of lenders eligible to participate in the program; (iii) the method for monitoring the 12- implementation by participants to insure that the program will be consistent with the Housing Plan; (iv) the administrative capacity of the Authority and other methods of administering, servicing and supervising the program; (v) the cost of the program to the Authority, including future administrative expenses; (vi) the restrictions on the purchase prices of housing units to be financed under the program; (vii) the limits on income of persons or families receiving financing under the program; and (viii) certain other limitations. Section 1. Definitions. The following terms when used in this program shall have the following meanings, respectively: ( 1) "Acquisition Fund" shall mean that fund to be created under an indenture,of trust or similar agreement between the Authority and a Trustee for holders of the Bonds into which shall be credited certain proceeds of the Bonds and other funds, if any, and from which the Authority shall purchase Mortgage Loans qualified for purchase under the Program. ( 2) "Act" shall mean Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C as currently in effect and as the same may be from time to time amended. ( 3) "Adjusted Gross Income" shall mean Gross Family Income, less $750 for each Adult in the family, to a maximum of two Adults, and less $500 for each other Dependent in the family. ( 4) "Adult" shall mean anyone who has attained a legal age of majority -under Minnesota law but who is hot a Dependent. ( 5) "Affiliate" of any specified Person shall mean any other Person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by or under direct or indirect common control with such specified Person. For purposes of this definition, control, when used with respect to any specified Person, shall mean the power to direct the management and policies of such Person, directly or indirectly whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise. ( 6) "Agency" shall mean the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, or any successor to its functions under the Act. ( 7) "Authority" shall mean the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority acting on behalf of the City. ( 8) "Bonds" shall mean the revenue bonds to be issued by the Authority to finance the Program. ( 9) "City" shall mean the City of Eagan, State of Minnesota. (10) "City Council" shall mean the governing body of the City. (11) "Commencement Date" shall mean the later of (a) first day on which the Authority has Bond proceeds avail- able to purchase Mortgage Loans under the Program, or (b) for New Housing Units to be purchased with Oma/ Mortgage Loan proceeds, the date on which pre -sale efforts to market New Housing Units has commenced. (12) "Dependent" shall mean dependent, as defined in Section 152 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and the regulations thereunder. (13) "Developer" shall mean any Person engaged in the construction for sale of Housing Units, and any Affiliate of such Person. (14) "FHA" shall mean the Federal Housing Administration, an agency of the United States of America within the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, or any successor to its functions. (15) "FHLMC" shall mean the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or any successor to its functions. (16) "FNMA" shall mean the Federal National Mortgage Association, or any succcessor to its functions. (17) "Gross Family Income" shall mean the current annual income from all sources of the Mortgagor, his or her spouse, and any guarantor or co-owner of a fee interest in the Housing Unit to be financed with the proceeds of a Mortgage Loan as determined in accordance with the then current loan origination requirements of FHLMC, FNMA, FHA or VA as to Mortgage Loans originated under programs regulated by FHLMC, FNMA, FHA or VA, or as to a conventional Mortgage Loan by the Qualified Mortgage Guaranty Insurer insuring such Mortgage Loan, as the case may be, as verified by an Originator in accordance with such requirements and its customary underwriting practices. (18) "Housing Plan" shall mean the Housing Plan of the City, as adopted by the City Council on , and any amendment thereof. (19) "Housing Unit" shall mean residential real property and facilities functionally related and subordinate thereto securing a Mortgage Loan, which shall be a private detached or attached one- two- three- or four -unit family dwelling, or a one -family apartment under condominium ownership (as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 515A), not including a mobile home or trailer even if attached to a permanent foundation, including a New Housing Unit, owned and occupied by an individual or family as a principal residence (or, if the Housing Unit contains more than one dwelling unit, one of such dwelling units is owned and occupied by an individual or family as a principal residence), containing complete living facilities and located within the geographical boundaries of the City. (20) "Lending Institution" shall mean any bank, trust company, savings bank, national banking association, savings and loan association, building and loan association, mortgage bank or other mortgage lender or governmental agency which customarily makes or services mortgage loans on owner -occupied residential A5 3 housing, or any holding company for any of the foregoing, provided, however, such Lending Institution is approved by FHA, VA, FNMA or FHLMC or is approved by the Authority. (21) "Mortgage Insurer" shall mean the FHA, the VA or any Qualified Mortgage Guaranty Insurer. (22) "Mortgage Loan" shall mean an interest bearing loan to a Mortgagor for the purpose of purchasing a Housing Unit, evidenced by a promissory note and secured by a mortgage on such Housing Unit. (23) "Mortgagor" shall mean an individual or individuals who have received a Mortgage Loan. (24) "New Housing Unit" shall mean a newly constructed Housing Unit, to which the Mortgagor will be the first owner occupant. (25) "Origination Agreement" shall mean a written agreement between an Originator and the Authority under which the Originator agrees to originate and sell to the Authority and the Authority agrees to purchase Mortgage Loans pursuant to this Program. (26) "Originator" shall mean a Lending Institution which executes an Origination Agreement as an originator. (27) "Originator Commitment" shall mean a written commitment by an Originator to the Authority, in a form acceptable to the Authority, by which the Originator agrees, upon certain terms and conditions, to enter into an Origination Agreement. (28) "Person" shall mean any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization or government or any agency or political subdivision thereof. (29) "Pledged Savings Account" shall mean a savings account established in connection with a Pledged Savings Account Mortgage Loan, which savings account and the earnings thereon may be used to make payments on the Mortgage Loan any time during the initial years of its amortization period and which is pledged as security for the Pledged Savings Account Mortgage Loan. (30) "Pledged Savings Account Mortgage Loan" shall mean a Mortgage Loan originated pursuant to any plan approved by the Program Administrator, for which a portion of the principal and interest payments during the initial years of such Mortgage Loan are expected to be paid from a Pledged Savings Account. (31) "Program" shall mean this single family housing finance program authorized by the City and to be implemented by the Authority pursuant to the Act. (32) "Program Administrator" shall mean any Lending Insitutution which agrees in writing with the Authority to monitor the origination and servicing of i Mortgage Loans sold to the Authority under the Program or to service all such Mortgage Loans, and to perform such other functions as are agreed upon by such Program Administrator and the Authority. (33) "Project" shall mean a development of New Housing Units, including condominiums or townhouses constructed by a Developer, and including condominiums or townhouses constructed by a Developer for individuals who may sell their existing Housing Units to persons who will finance the purchase of such existing Housing Units with Mortgage Loans made available by the Program. (34) "Qualified Mortgage Guaranty Insurer" shall mean any mortgage guaranty insurance company approved by FNMA or FHLMC, which is licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota and (i) whose insurance policies would not adversely affect the rating on the Bonds with the rating agency which initially rated the Bonds or (ii) is rated by such agency on the basis of claims payment ability at the highest rating then given insurers issuing mortgage guaranty insurance policies, so long as such agency rates such insurers on the basis of claims payment ability. (35) "Target Area" shall mean a targeted area as defined in Section 462C.02, Subdivision 9 of the Act, as such Target Areas may exist on the Commencement Date, or as may thereafter be established. (36) "VA" shall mean the Veterans Administration, an agency of the United States of America, or any successor to its functions. -Z6 Section 2. Program for Acquisition of Mortgage Loans. The City hereby establishes a Program for the Authority to acquire Mortgage Loans by contracting with Originators to Purchase Mortgage Loans from Originators at such purchase prices and upon such other terms and conditions described herein or as shall be determined by the Authority in Origination Agreements to be entered into between the Authority and Originators. In establishing and carrying out such Program the Authority may exercise, within the corporate limits of the City, any of the powers the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency may exercise under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A. Insofar as the Authority has or will contract with underwriters, financial advisors, legal counsel, a Program Administrator and a trustee, all of whom will be reimbursed from Bond proceeds and continuing Program revenues, it is not expected that additional staff will be necessary to implement the Program, nor is it expected that any additional staff costs need be paid from the Authority's budget. The Program Administrator will administer the performance of the Originators with respect to the limitations set forth in this Program, and will monitor the Originators' servicing of the Mortgage Loans or will itself service the Mortgage Loans. The Authority will select a trustee for the bondholders who will be required to be experienced in trust management and has a large corporate trust portfolio. The trustee will administer and maintain the Bonds sold to finance the Program. -10- R7 The Executive Director of the Authority will monitor all negotiations between the various parties taking part in the Program to insure that the Program documents are consistent with the Housing Plan and the Program. Prior to the adoption of the resolution authorizing the sale of Bonds to finance the Program, the Executive Director shall report to the Board of Commissioners of the Authority his findings as to the consistency of the Program documents with the Housing Plan and the policies of the City contained in this Program. Section 3. Non -Bond Proceeds to be Contributed to the Procram To assure the financial feasibility of the Program and to assure that interest rates on the Mortgage Loans will be as favorable as possible to purchasers of Housing Units, as well as to assure the completion of Projects intended to be benefited by the Program, the Authority may commit various revenues and other resources to the Program. Section 4. Standards and Reeuirements Relating to Mortgage Loans Pursuant to the Program. The following standards and requirements shall apply with respect to Mortgage Loans acquired by the Authority pursuant to the Program: ( 1) A Mortgage Loan may be made only to finance the purchase of a Housing Unit existing at the time such Mortgage Loan is made. Construction loans shall not be made, but an Originator may enter into an agreement with a Mortgagor to make a Mortgage Loan to him or her upon the completion of the construction of a New Housing Unit to be financed by such Mortgage Loan, subject to the "first-come, first-served" and nondiscrimination basis requirements of Section 4 (2) hereof, and subject to the receipt of a certificate of a City building inspector stating that the New Housing Unit complies with the building code requirements of the state building code, set forth under Minnesota Statutes, Sec. 16.83 et seq., as they are then in effect. ( 2) Each Originator shall accept and process applications for Mortgage Loans for the purchase or construction of Housing Units on a nondiscriminatory "first-come, first-served" basis, subject to the other provisions of the Program, including any set asides and restrictions imposed by Section 5 hereof, and will not arbitrarily reject an application for a Mortgage Loan for a Housing Unit within a specified geographic area because of the location and/or age of the property, or, in the case of a proposed Mortgagor, arbitrarily vary the terms of a loan or the application procedures therefore because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age or status with regard to public assistance or disability. M-1 ( 3) The Mortgagor of each Housing Unit must be the fee owner of such Housing Unit and must occupy such Housing Unit or, if the Housing Unit contains more than one dwelling unit, one of such dwelling units as his or his principal place of residence. ( 4) At least ninety percent (90%) of the moneys available to make Mortgage Loans shall be used to purchase Mortgage Loans made to first-time homebuyers,including Mortgagors who have not owned a home during any part of the three (3) years prior to the date of closing of th mortgage Loan. Up to ten percent (10%) of the moneys available to make Mortgage Loans may be used to purchase Mortgage Loans made to persons or families who are not first-time homebuyers including those who have owned a home during some part of the three (3) years prior to the date of closing of the Mortgage Loan, provided they meet all other requirements of the Program. ( 5) Mobile homes and trailers are not Housing Units for purpose of the Program, even if such mobile homes and trailers are attached to permanent foundations. ( 6) Each Housing Unit must be located within the corporate limits of the City. ( 7) Loans must be made only to finance homes that are serviced by municipal water and sewer utilities. ( 8) The purchase price of a Housing Unit may not exceed the lesser of (a) three times the limit on Adjusted Vol Gross Income of the Mortgagor set forth in Section 4 (12); (b) four times the Adjusted Gross Income of the mortgagor if the Housing Unit is located within a Target Area or (c) 110% of the average area purchase price for residential housing in the Minneapolis -St. Paul Standard Metropolitan Area computed as provided under the Proposed Treasury Regulations or any final regulations promulgated under Section 103A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. ( 9) Each Mortgage Loan must, at a minimum, be insured or guaranteed if the original principal amount of the Mortgage Loan exceeds (or is expected at any time to exceed) 75% of the lesser of the purchase price or appraised value of the property subject to the related Mortgage , with either (i) FHA Insurance, (ii) a VA Guaranty or (iii) a Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Policy. (10) The Adjusted Gross Income of a Mortgagor at the time of application for a Mortgage Loan shall not exceed the greater of: ( i) 110 percent of the median family income as estimated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Minneapolis -St. Paul Standard Metropolitan Area; or ( ii) 100 percent of the income limit established by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for the City. WA Provided that, beginning six (6) months after the Commencement Date, up to twenty -percent (20%) of the amount of bond proceeds deposited in the Acquisition Fund may be used to purchase Mortgage Loans made to Mortgagors with Adjusted Gross income in excess of the amount set forth above who are purchasing Housing Units located within a Target Area. (11) For the first six (6) months after the Commencement Date, 100% of the funds provided for the purchase of Mortgage Loans may be made or committed only to Mortgagors with Adjusted Gross Incomes at the time of application of less than eighty percent (80%) of the limit set forth in Section 4 (11). (12) To the extent required by the Act or other applicable laws or to preserve the exemption of interest on the Bonds from federal or state income taxation, the assumption of a Mortgage Loan from a Mortgagor by any other person or persons shall be permitted only if the requirements of Sections 4(4), 4(8), and 4(3) are met with respect to the assumption. (13) An Originator may be allowed to retain from a Mortgagor or seller an origination fee not exceeding one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) (or such greater or lesser amount as shall be specified by the Authority in the Origination Agreements) of the principal amount of the Mortgage Loan. In addition, each -1..J2-1.00 Mortgagor may be charged a program participation fee of two percent (2%) of the original principal amount of a Mortgage Loan, or such greater or lesser amount as shall be specified by the Authority, all or a portion which may be deferred and made payable with (and in addition to) the last installment of principal and interest due on such Mortgage Loan, whether at the scheduled final maturity of such Mortgage Loan or at its prepayment in full prior to its final maturity. A Developer and/or Seller of a Housing Unit may also be charged an additional origination fee, which fee may be used to defray Program costs. (14) The City hereby requests a waiver by MHFA of the restrictions of Section 462C.03, Subdivision 5 of the Act. Failure by the MHFA to reject this program will be deemed to constitute approval of such waiver. (15) The difference between the interest rate on Mortgage Loans and the interest rates on the Bonds issued to acquire such Mortgage Loans shall represent only the costs of insurance premiums, amortized expenses of issuing the Bonds, the Authority's ongoing costs for the administration of the Program, fees of originating, servicing, and administering the Mortgage Loans and trustee and paying agent fees, computed so as to provide that the Bonds shall not be deemed to be "arbitrage bonds" under the Proposed -16-33 Regulations or any final regulations promulgated under Section 103A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. (16) In the event that the Authority acquires any existing residences in the City, with the intention of demolishing such residences and making the cleared sites available for the construction of New Housing Units, the Authority will make available to qualified residents of the residences so acquired any relocation assistance and benefits required to be provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.52 et seq. (17) Sellers of existing homes will be required to pay to have their homes inspected by a licensed truth in housing evaluator in accordance with the Dakota County Authority's regulations, as they exist at the time of sale. Section 5. Set Asides and Restrictions Relatint, to the Acquisition of Mortgaa e Loans. Notwithstanding anything in Section 3 to the contrary, the following restrictions shall apply with respect to Mortgage Loans acquired by the Authority pursuant to the Program: ( 1) The Authority may permit commitments to be made by Originators to (a) Developers to provide Mortgage Loans on New Housing Units to be constructed by such Developers, or (b) Developers who will provide -17-� Mortgage Loans for homebuyers purchasing existing Housing Units owned by the purchasers of Housing Units in the Developer's Project. Developers and Originators may be charged a commitment fee for such set asides, which fee may be used to defray Program costs. No more than seventy-five percent (75%) of the moneys deposited in the Acquisition Fund may be used to purchase Mortgage Loans for New Housing Units built or sold by any one Developer. ( 2) The Authority will enter into an Origination Agreement with each Originator proposing to originate Mortgage Loans pursuant to the Program. Each Origination Agreement shall specify the dollar amount of the Originator Commitment, provided that no more than seventy-five percent (75%) of the moneys deposited in the Acquisition Fund may be used to purchase Mortgage Loans from any one Originator, unless other eligible Lending Institutions are not interested in participating. ( 3) Any Financial institution, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 47.0151, doing business in the City which is an FHA/VA approved or FNMA/FHLMC approved lender shall be offered an opportunity to participate in the Program as an Originator. ( 4) For the first 12 months or such greater or lesser time as shall be specified by the Authority after the Commencement Date, ten percent (10%) of the amounts -18- 'S deposited in the Acquisition Fund may be reserved for non -first-time homebuyers who purchase a Housing Unit in a Project. If, after 12 months or such greater or lesser time as shall be specified by the Authority, any funds so set aside have not been used to purchase Mortgage Loans, they may be used by non -first-time homebuyers purchasing any Housing Units in the City. ( 5) For the first nine (9) months or such greater or lesser time as shall be specified by the Authority after the Commencement date, no more than twenty percent (20%) of the amounts deposited in the Acquisition Fund may be used to acquire Mortgage Loans for Housing Units under townhouse ownership. At the end of such nine-month period, moneys remaining in the Acquisition Fund may be used to acquire any qualified mortgage loan. ( 6) For the first nine (9) months or such greater or lesser time as shall be specified by the Authority after the commencement date, no more than twenty percent (20%) of the amounts deposited in the Acquisition Fund may be used to acquire Mortgage Loans for Housing Units under condominium ownership. At the end of such nine-month period, moneys remaining in the Acquisition Fund may be used to acquire any qualified mortgage loan. Section 6. Evidence of Compliance. The Authority may require from each Originator, at or before the time an agreement to originate Mortgage Loans is entered into by such Originator, evidence satisfactory to the Authority of the ability and intention of such Originator to make Mortgage Loans and sell them to the Authority under such agreement, and, at the time the Authority acquires a Mortgage Loan, evidence satisfactory to the Authority of compliance with the standards and requirements for the making of Mortgage Loans established by the Authority herein and in any agreement entered .into between the Authority and the Originator; and in connection therewith, the Authority or its representatives, including the Program Administrator, may inspect the relevant books and records of such Originator in order to confirm such ability, intention and compliance. Section 7. Issuance of Bonds To finance the Program the Authority, on behalf of the City intends by resolution to authorize, issue and sell by December 31, 1986 its Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds in an aggregate principal amount up to $10,000,000, of which approximately $9,000,000 will be -available to purchase Mortgage Loans. The balance of Bond proceeds will be used to pay underwriting costs, to fund a reserve fund for the Bonds and to pay Bond issuance costs. Principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable solely from the proceeds of the Bonds and the revenues of the Program. The Authority shall enter PIC into an indenture of trust with an institution authorized to accept such trusts and which is experienced in trust management and has a large corporate trust portfolio, upon such terms and conditions as the Board of Commissioners of the Authority shall determine, being advised thereon by bond counsel. In issuing Bonds, the Authority may exercise, within the corporate limits of the City, any and all of the powers the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency is authorized to exercise under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A, without limitation under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Section 8. Severability. The provisions of this Program are severable, and if any of its provisions, sentences, clauses or paragraphs shall be held unconstitutional, contrary to statute, exceeding the authority of the City or the Authority or otherwise illegal or inoperative by any court of competent jurisdiction, such defect - shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions. 0076E -21 3 Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen FINAL RESOLUTION/MULTIFAMILY HOUSING FOR ROYAL OAK CIRCLE PROJECT C. Public Hearing to Consider Final Resolution to the $12,580,000 Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond/Royal Oak Circle Project --Miller & Schroeder Financial Inc., the City's program administrator for multifamily housing revenue bonds, has received a request from Richard Asp of Asp Construction Company, developer of the Royal Oak Circle project, requesting final approval to a $12,580,000 multifamily housing revenue bond project. For a location identifi- cation, a copy of the final plat is enclosed on page fAG for your review. Normally, a final resolution does not require a public hearing; however, the applicant is requesting an increase in the housing revenue bond amount to be approved by the City. The original inducement resolution was approved by the City Council on February 5, 1985, in the amount of $11,440,000. This amount was in compliance with the Council's policy of inducing not more than 800 of the market value appraisal. According to Miller & Schroeder Financial Inc., since the initial appraisal and induce- ment, a review of the project by a potential mortgage/bond insurer, the project can support a higher mortgage loan and therefore, additional insurance will be provided. As a result, the developer is requesting that the approved bond amount of $11,440,000 be increased by 10% to $12,580,000 which is in legal compliance with Minnesota statutes 462.C. Attached on page is a copy of a legal opinion from Holmes and Graven regardi g the proposed adjustment to the multifamily housing revenue bond amount. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the final resolution for the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds to the Royal Oak Circle project. si � Ni, � I•• . w%�• .. 1` I�t v f C 0 / n,n 'Z A .R • � ylw � � Ips w . V r, A r� • W . . 1'w•A•. W O Z N 0.20'37' E _ f _ – 213.00 `A n O . �l f ,I • .w �� Q 120, X98.33 —� Y– i X rL T net 4 !1[111 Ir. -=��• i11w.e1.-r•/: :-A A ryr_r�e Lll.l H111 V.L_IYI o C,^ 1rt U/l r7i ^TIr�.• ?• lli r\r IAlAY Ir71 e� AIrl I[�_`2 lI!N. L_I+1=V— 1= 2 A L Ta - y �+ o � 0 9 `: Ia.-Ogg a= s �-- S i T ' y r i S w� � e� f f�•� 'I i 1' . i� � aN� • 290.96 • / B6 J9 IP•SS.oD• 'IjqeO � 0.20.3 •i .;y�lV1!! . .. �. .d•!0'0000' 193. O. � Ni, � I•• . w%�• .. 1` I�t v f C 0 / n,n 'Z A .R • � ylw � � Ips w . V r, A r� • W . . 1'w•A•. W O Z N 0.20'37' E _ f _ – 213.00 `A n O . �l f ,I • .w �� Q 120, X98.33 —� Y– i X rL T net 4 !1[111 Ir. -=��• i11w.e1.-r•/: :-A A ryr_r�e Lll.l H111 V.L_IYI o C,^ 1rt U/l r7i ^TIr�.• ?• lli r\r IAlAY Ir71 e� AIrl I[�_`2 lI!N. L_I+1=V— 1= 2 A L Ta - y �+ w M S i T ' y r J Attorneys at Law JAMES S. HOLMES DAVID L. GRAVEN JOHN R. LARSON CHARLES R. WEAVER ROBERT L. DAVIDSON ROBERT J. LINDALL JOHN M. LEFEVRE. JR. LARRY M. W ERTHEIM JOHN C. UTLEY STANLEY E. KEHL JONATHAN P. SCOLL JEFFREY R.BRAUCHLE Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: HOLMES & GRAVEN CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 338-1177 2200 Northwestern Financial Center, Bloomington, MN 55431 (612)893-9400 November 7, 1985 ICAi.7 '1, 1j :-mow TIMOTHY P. FLAHERTY STEFANIE N. GALEY DANIEL R. NELSON BARBARA L. PORTWOOD ROBERT J, DEIKE MARK A. LINDGREN LAURA K. MOLLET BRUCE A. KOHN STEWARTD. GREGG CHRISTINE M. CHALE MARY G. DOBBINS MARYJ. BRENDEN STEVEN T. HETLAND PATRICIA A. BLOODGOOD TIMOTHY E. MARX ERICA. SHORT Re: $12,580,000 City of Eagan, Minnesota Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond (Royal Oaks Circle Project) I have been informed that the developer for the above referenced project is requesting that the bond amount of $11,440,000 be increased by 10% to $12,580,000. On February 5, 1985, the Eagan City Council gave preliminary approval to a bond issue size of $11,440,000 based upon the market value appraisal. After a current review of the Project by a potential mortgage/bond insurer, it was determined that the Project can support a higher mortgage loan. Consequently, the insurer agreed to provide the necessary additional insurance. This letter will outline the procedure to be followed to increase the originally approved bond amount by 10%, up to $12,580,000. The original preliminary resolution adopted by the City Council is still acceptable. However, it will be necessary to publish notice of a new TEFRA hearing and hold a new TEFRA hearing prior to adoption of the final resolution. The notice of the TEFRA hearing must be published at least 15 days before the hearing in a newspaper circulating generally in the City of Eagan. The public hearing may be conducted on the same day that the City Council adopts the final bond resolution. The final bond resolution shall reflect the increased bond amount. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. JCU/ssd cc: Ann Reim Ve my yours, 1,L C . John 1C. Utley 1// Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen PROJECT 454, ASBURY ROAD (STREETS & UTILITIES) D. Project 454, Asbury Road (Streets and Utilities) --In response to a petition received from the developers of the Blackhawk Glen Addition and the Blue Cross/Blue Shield property, a feasibility report was prepared and presented to the Councilfor their review and consideration at the November 6 Council meeting with the public hearing being scheduled for December 3. Enclosed on the following pages without page number is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing date. Our consulting engineer and Public Works Director will be available to discuss the details associated with this proposed public improvement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 454 (Asbury Road - Streets and Utilities) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and speicfications. V7- REPORT ON BLACKHAWK GLEN (ASHBURY ROAD UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 454 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1985 Comm: 49366 %�o�sedfhoa, ilaseHe, rQade4la a 4dd4c&44", .low. l?OM4"MAP Cxqiae� St past, Mia^eeota z ° 1335 ?(/ 7 Aq./ • 36 f cS't. Pd, A i.w.sara 55H3 PA.: 6t2-636-4600 October 15, 1985 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Blackhawk Glen (Ashbury Road) Street and Utility Improvements Project 454 Our File No. 49366 Dear Mayor and Council: Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. Robert W. Rosene, P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner, P.E. James C. Olson, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keith A. Gordon, P.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.£. Richard W. Foster, P.E. Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. Donald C. Burgardt, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T. Rautmann. P.E. Robert R. PJefferle, P.E. David O. Loskota, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelskv Harlon M. Olson Enclosed is our report for Blackhawk Glen (Ashbury Road), Project 454. This report covers utility and street improvements and includes a preliminary as- sessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas E. Angus TEA: li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of innesota. Mark A. Hanson ate: October 15,1985 Reg. No. 14260 ,. Approved by: Department of i� Pub r''Works Date: 1I fy5/ 1409d SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of lateral sanitary sewer, trunk water main, trunk storm sewer, and Ashbury Road within Blackhawk Glen First Addition and the Blue Cross property. As a result of this project, a loop of the trunk water main and the trunk storm sewer system within area C south of Yankee Doodle Road will be completed. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project as outlined herein is in accor- dance with the City's Water Supply and Distribution Plan. Revisions are pro- posed to the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. However, these revisions are minor and will not affect the outflow rate or required storage capacity of Pond CP -10 which is the downstream pond at Yankee Doodle Road and T.H. 13 for this area. Ashbury Road, as proposed, deviates from the Comprehensive Street Plan be- cause it will be designed to local access standards and not be classified as a neighborhood collector. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - An 8" diameter lateral sanitary sewer is proposed along Ash- bury Road west of Birch Pond Road to serve future development and the proposed City park site. The sanitary sewer will connect to the existing trunk sani- tary sewer at the north end of Birch Pond Road. Sewer services are also pro- posed for future lots within Outlots B, D, and E of Blackhawk Glen First Addi- tion and the City park. No sewer services are proposed as part of this proj- ect to serve the Blue Cross property. Water Main - An 18" diameter trunk water main is proposed along Ashbury Road from Birch Pond Road to Hampton Heights as shown on the attached drawing. The trunk water -main will connect to the 18" trunk main at the south end of Hamp- ton Heights- Addition that is to be constructed as a part of the Hampton Page 1. 1409d Heights/Coachman Road Trunk Water Main Project No. 451 and an existing 18" trunk main in Birch Pond Road. This connection will complete a loop of the trunk system and will provide an alternate water source during the lowering of the existing trunk main in Yankee Doodle Road when it is reconstructed in 1986. A 12" diameter lateral water main is proposed along Ashbury Road from Birch Pond Road to Blue Cross Road. The 12" line will provide capacity for future commercial development within the Blue Cross PUD. One inch services will be stubbed off of the 18" trunk main to serve future lots within Outlots B, D, & E Blackhawk Glen First Addition. In addition, water services are pro- posed to the City park and the future Well Site No. 10. No water services are proposed as part of this project to serve the Blue Cross property. Storm Sewer - With the development of Blackhawk Glen, the storm sewer outlet for Pond CP -11 is required. The outlet for Pond CP -11 is north to Pond CP -6 within the Blue Cross property (Parcel 010-01, Section 17). Since the construction of the water treatment plant and the trunk storm sewer overflow from Pond CP -2 to CP -11, Pond CP -11 has been filling rapidly and is now close to the design HWL of 809. Based on this and the proposed de- velopments of Hampton Heights, Royal Oak, and Blackhawk Glen contributing in- creased storm water runoffs, the storm sewer outlet for Pond CP -6 is recom- mended at this time. The outlet for Pond CP -6 is north to an existing storm sewer in Yankee Doodle Road at T.H. No. 13 as shown on the attached drawing. The existing storm sewer ultimately discharges to Pond CP -10 at the NE corner of Yankee Doodle Road and T.H. No. 13. Due to the desires of developments adjacent to Ponds CP -11 & CP -6 to in- crease pond depths and reduce total depth of variations between HWL and NWL, and based on new information and development plans, revisions by varying de- grees are proposed for all ponds upstream of CP -10. The proposed new pond data are given in Appendix A. Page 2. 1409d Based on these revisions restricted outlets will be required for Ponds CP -1, CP -11, and CP -6. For Pond CP -1 revisions to the existing outlet struc- ture will be required to reduce the outflow rate to 2.1 cfs. This revision involves adding additional manhole sections to the existing outlet structure and controlling outflow by use of an orifice. It is proposed to control the outflow rate for Pond CP -11 by the same type of control structure used in Pond CP -1. The outflow rate for Pond CP -6 can be best controlled by pipe size and grade. Lateral storm sewer is proposed in Ashbury Road. This sewer will dis- charge into the trunk storm sewer between Pond CP -11 and Pond CP -6. In order to handle present and future lateral storm sewer flows and due to grade limi- tations, the trunk storm sewer is proposed to increase in size from 15" at Birch Pond Road to 36" at the inlet to Pond CP -6. Drainage of Ashbury Road from a high point east of Birch Pond Road to the east end of the project is proposed to flow into Pond CP -11. Drainage of the westerly 150' of Ashbury Road will flow west into the existing storm sewer system along Blue Cross Road. STREETS: Street construction as proposed will include a 32' wide street con- structed to a 9 ton design thickness between Blue Cross Road and Birch Pond Road and 7 ton east of the intersection. The proposed construction of Ashbury Road will be from the west end of the present Blackhawk Glen project (approxi- mately 1,400' east of Birch Pond Road) to Blue Cross Road. The connecting street between the proposed Hampton Heights development and Ashbury Road is also proposed under this project. Birch Pond Road will be curved to the northeast creating an approximate "T" intersection to discourage through traffic within the Blackhawk Hills de - Page 3. 1409d velopment. The point of intersection with Blue Cross Road has been estab- lished at the south entrance to the Blue Cross parking lot. EASEMENTS: The proposed construction will require acquisition of easements from Parcel 010-01, NE 1/4, Section 17; Parcel 010-30, NW 1/4, Section 16; Lot 1, Block 1, Blue Cross Addition; and Outlot D, Blackhawk Glen First Addition. These easements will be for the trunk storm sewer lines, one lateral storm sewer, Ashbury Road, and Pond CP -6. The estimated amount of permanent ease- ment required from each parcel is listed below: Parcel 010-01, NE 1/4, Section 17 010-30, NW 1/4, Section 16 Lot 1, Block 1, Blue Cross Addition Outlot D. Blackhawk Glen First Addition 1409d Permanent Easement (Acs.) PondinS Utility Street Total 4.7 0.3 2.0 7.0 -- 0.3 1.3 1.6 -- 0.5 -- 0.5 -- 0.3 -- 0.3 Page 4. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Construction Area Blackhawk Glen First Addition Outlot B Outlot D Outlot E NW 1/4, Section 16 Parcel 010-30 NE 1/4,_Section 17 Parcel 010-01 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) Parcel 010-01 (City of Eagan Park) Lot 1, Block 1, Blue Cross Addition Assessment Area Blackhawk Glen First Addition Outlot B Outlot D Outlot E NW 1/4, Section 16 Parcel 010-30 Parcel 012-29 Parcel 011-29 NE 1/4, Section 17 Parcel 010-01 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) Parcel 010-01 (City of Eagan Park) COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix B located at the back of this report and are summarized below: Sanitary Sewer $ 42,590 Water Main 152,250 Services 29,130 Storm Sewer, Part A 226,160 Storm Sewer, Part B 137,350 Street 269,850 TOTAL ............................ $857,330 ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix C. All non trunk assessment rates will be revised based on final costs. Page 5. 1409d SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of the lateral sani- tary sewer on a front foot basis along Ashbury Road to Parcel 010-30 and the portion of 010-01 that is not City Park property. Trunk area sanitary sewer was previously assessed under Projects 15A, 29, & 371. WATER - MAIN: It is proposed to assess an equivalent lateral benefit charge against all properties abutting Ashbury Road, except City Park property, in accordance with their proposed zoning. The 1985 rates are as follows: Single Family & Multi -Family ...................$11.875/f.f. Costs associated with the water main oversizing will be the responsibility of the trunk fund. Trunk area water main was previously assessed under Proj- ect 15A, 29 & 371. SERVICES: It is proposed to assess the cost of services equally to the bene- fited properties with the exception of the 111" water service. This service is for a future City well site and will be paid for from the City's Water Utility Enterprise fund. STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral storm sewer to all benefited properties, except City Park property, on an area basis with the exception of the 12" line that flows from Ashbury Road into Pond CP -11. The cost of this line is proposed to be assessed equally to Parcel 010-30 and Outlot D, Blackhawk Glen. Costs for the trunk storm sewer will be covered by past trunk area assessments levied under Project 371 and by assessing previ- ously non -assessed areas. The non -assessed areas, as shown on Figure 5, are all within the Blue Cross PUD. Since exact sizes of each defined use within the PUD are unknown, all areas within the PUD are -proposed to be treated as single family. When platting and development of these areas occurs, the dif- ference in assessment between single family and platted use should be levied. Page 6. 1409d STREET: It is proposed to assess the total cost of Ashbury Road on a front foot basis to all abutting properties with the exception of the City Park property. TRUNK RATES: The trunk storm sewer oversize rate in effect at the time of this report for single family is $0.048/sq.ft. The lateral benefit from trunk water main for single and multiple family is $11.875/F.F. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Page 7. 1409d Project Cost Revenue Balance A) SANITARY SEWER Lateral $ 42,590 Lateral Assessment $ 421590 $ 42,590 $ 42,590 -- 0 - B) WATER MAIN Trunk and Lateral $152,250 Lateral Assessment $ 76,638 $152,250 $ 76,638 -$75,612 C) SERVICES Lateral $ 29,130 Lateral Assessment $ 28,519 Water Util. Enterprise Fund 611 $ 29,130 $ 29,130 - 0 - D) STORM SEWER Lateral $ 97,350 Trunk 266,160 Lateral Assessment $ 97,350 Trunk Area Assessment 269,104 $363,510 $366,454 +$ 2,944 E) STREET Lateral $269,850 Lateral Assessment $269,850 $269,850 $269,850 -- 0 - Page 7. 1409d PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 8. 1409d November 6, 1985 December 3, 1985 January, 1986 Winter 1986 Fall 1986 Spring 1987 May 1988 W T Cd C W N O w C 0 a to W Cd W O .d d C 6 O U d d d p v W F r a v e co N I U .. Is dh a 0 • 5 N on a •4 s 0— w c r w C: v FO y U 9 s d o .+ m p o O w w ., o y d bo O C� Y O + I 9O O O O O N G, O. N O+ O D O cn eo N CO 00 co O ..1 a o 00 N 0 0 c + + + O N I- OO N N C4 N O O d co O @$ cD r H >. d H A z A Csl w d m w rn n o .+ m g � o+ 3 p 41U c' H v W V a w aoc euo d „ o ao M a L c u m 4 00 W tn 'v Q N cn toM d d u o 0 c A c wd Y Y Id d N O% co L!1 .O •O C tJ d O N +-+ O v .4 W p � n m rn d 3v+ p -41W V •� .. d H t] W d 73. Lam+. N •O O aD r+ •o u O a 0 N U V O U V U W it it W T Cd C W N O w C 0 a to W Cd W O .d d C 6 O U d d d p v W F r a v e co N I U .. Is dh a 0 • 5 N on a AnnVW"TV 4 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE BLACKHAWK GLEN PROJECT NO. 454 A. SANITARY SEWER 1,700 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. $ 20,400 1 Each 8"x4" Wye in pl. @ $50.00/each 50 8 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 8,000 10 Lin.ft. Outside drop in pl. @ $100.00/each 1,000 1 Each Connect 8" PVC to exist. MH @ $300.00/each 300 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 1,700 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,700 11,000 Lbs. Subtotal $ 32,450 1 Each +5% Contingencies 1,623 1 Each Connect 18" DIP to exist. 18" DIP @ $400.00/each $ 34,073 1 Each +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest _8,517 TOTALSANITARY SEWER .............................. $ 42,590 B. WATER MAIN 12650 Lin.ft. 18" DIP Water main in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. $ 49,500 1,800 Lin.ft. 12" DIP Water main in pl. @ $18.00/lin.ft. 32,400 200 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 2,400 6 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $950.00/lin.ft. 5,700 2 Each 18" Butterfly valve & box in pl. @ $1,500.00/each 3,000 3 Each 12" Butterfly valve G.V. & Box in pl. @ $700.00/each 23,100 3 Each 6" Resilient wedge G.V. & Box in pl. @ $350.00/each 1,050 11,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl.. @ $1.00/lb. 11,000 1 Each Wet. tap 12" DIP to exist. 16" DIP @ $2,500.00/each 2,500 1 Each Connect 18" DIP to exist. 18" DIP @ $400.00/each 400 1 Each Connect 18" DIP to exist. 8" DIP @ $300.00/each 300 200 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe in pl. @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,000 32650 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 3,650 Subtotal $1160000 +5% Contingencies 5,800 $121,800 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 301450_ TOTALWATER MAIN ................................. $152,250 Page 10. 1409d C. SERVICES 680 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer serv. in pl. @ $7.00/lin.ft. 4,760 745 Lin.ft. 1" Type "K" copper water serv. in pl. @ $5.00/lin.ft. 3,725 35 Lin.ft. lV2" Type "K" copper water serv. in pl. @ $6.00/lin.ft. 210 6 Each 4" tap of exist. 10" PVC San. Sewer @ $300.00/each 1,800 8 Each Connect to exist. 4" riser @ $250.00/each 2,000 55 Lin.ft. 4" PVC riser in pl. @ $20.00/lin.ft. 1,100 15 Each 1" Corp. stop in pl. @ $30.00/each 4,500 1 Each 1�2" Corp. stop in pl. @ $35.00/each 35 15 Each 1" Curb stop & box in pl. @ $80.00/each 12200 1 Each l�Z" Curb stop & box in pl. @ $85.00/each 85 200 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,000 780 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 780 Subtotal $ 22,195 +5% Contingencies 1,110 $ 23,305 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 5,825 TOTALSERVICES .................................... $ 29,130 Page 11. 1409d D. STORM SEWER Part A: Ashbury Road and Pond CP -11 to CP -6 Trunk LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $5,000.00/L.S. $ 4,000 60 Lin.ft. 36" RCP storm sewer 0'-20' dp. in pl. @ $45.00/l.f. 1,500 300 Lin.ft. 36" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $55.00/l.f. 10,500 400 Lin.ft. 27" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $45.00/l.f. 14,000 450 Lin.ft. 21" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $40.00/l.f. 15,750 1,120 Lin.ft. 18" RCP storm sewer 0'-20' dp. in pl. @ $30.00/l.f. 0 190 Lin.ft. 15" RCP storm sewer 0'-20' dp. in pl. @ $25.00/l.f. 4,750 60 Lin.ft. 15" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $35.00/l.f. 2,100 280 Lin.ft. 15" RCP storm sewer 30'-35' dp. in pl. @ $45.00/l.f. 129600 350 Lin.ft. 12" RCP storm sewer 0'-20' dp. in pl. @ $20.00/l.f. 0 3 Each 21" RCP storm sewer bends in pl. @ $200.00/each 450 2 Each 27" RCP storm sewer bends in pl. @ $300.00/each 300 1 Each Outlet control structure @ $3,000.00/each 3,000 LUMP SUM Modification to Outlet Control Structure for Pond CP -1 @ $1,000.00/L.S. 1,000 9 Each Std. MH 4' dia. w/cstg. in pl. @ $900.00/each 5,400 120 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 7,200 4 Each Std. CBMH w/cstg. in pl. @ $900.00/each 0 7 Each Std. CB w/cstg. in pl. @ $850.00/each 0 1 Each Relocate exist. CB @ $500.00/each 0 1 Each 33" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $1,800.00/each 500 1 Each 18" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $600.00/each 0 1 Each 15" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $500.00/each 500 1 Each 12" RCP Flared end @ $250.00/each 0 15 Cu.yds. Rip rap in pl. @ $70.00/cu.yd. 350 1,000 Cu.yds. Channel excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. 5,000 300 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,000 4.0 Acres Seed w/fertilizer & mulch @ $1,500.00/acre 5,000 3,310 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,240 Subtotal $ 98,140 +5% Contingencies 42907 $103,047 .+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 25,763 SUBTOTAL STORM SEWER ............................ $128,810 TOTALSTORM SEWER - PART A ........................ $226,160 Page 12. 1409d E. STORM SEWER Part B - Pond CP -6 to CP -10 160 Lin.ft. 15" RCP storm sewer 0'-20' dp. in pl. @ $25.00/l.f. 705 Lin.ft. 15" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $35.00/l.f. 100 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 15" RCP storm sewer @ $125.00/lin.ft. 05 Lin.ft. 12" RCP storm sewer 0'-20' dp. in pl.. @ $20.00/l.f. 350 Lin.ft. 12" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $28.00/l.f. 100 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 12" RCP storm sewer @ $100.00/lin.ft. 7 Each Std. MH 4' dia. w/cstg. in pl. @ $1,800.00/each 1 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 1 Each Connect MH to exist. RCP @ $500.00/each 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 14,000 Sq.yds. Sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 2.4 Acre Seed w/fertilizer & mulch @ $1,500.00/acre 1,490 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Subtotal +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL STORM SEWER POND CP -6 TO CP -10 .............. Page 13. 1409d $ 4,000 24,675 12,500 3,500 9,380 10,000 12,600 400 500 1,000 21,000 3,600 1,490 $104,645 5,232 $109,877 27,473 $137,350 F. STREET 27,000 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $1.00/cu.yd. $ 27,000 2,000 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 61000 1,000 Cu.yds. Select Granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 6,000 5,400 Ton Class 5, 100% crushed quarry rock @ $7.00/ton 37,800 21200 Ton Bituminous base course @ $10.00/ton 22,000 1,100 Ton Bituminous wear course @ $12.00/ton 13,200 180 Ton Bit. material for mixture @ $220.00/ton 392600 600 Gals. Bit. material for tack coat @ $1.20/gal. 720 7,100 Lin.ft. B618 Concrete curb & gutter @ $6.00/lin.ft. 42,600 14 Each Adjust MH & CB frame @ $150.00/each 2,100 9 Each Adjust GV & box @ $120.00/each 1,080 5.0 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/acre 7,500 Subtotal $205,600 +5% Contingencies 102 280 $215,880 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 53,970 TOTALSTREETS ..................................... $269,850 Page 14. 1409d APPENDIX C PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BLACKHAWK GLEN (ASHBURY ROAD) PROJECT NO. 454 A. SANITARY SEWER - LATERAL Assessable Total Parcel Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment SECTION 16 010-30 614 $15.14 $ 9,293 SECTION 17 010-01 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 2,200 $15.14 $ 33,297 TOTAL 2,814 $ 42,590 B. WATER MAIN - LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK SECTION 16 Blackhawk Glen First Addition: Outlot B 473 $11.88 $ 5,619 Outlot D 1,309 11.88 15,551 Outlot E 401 11.88 4,764 010-30 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 2,068 11.88 24,568 SECTION 17 010-01 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 2,200 $11.88 $ 262,136 TOTAL 6,451 $ 76,638 Page 15. 1409d C. SERVICES SECTION 16 Blackhawk Glen First Addition: Outlot B Outlot D Outlot E 010-30 (City of Eagan) Water Utility Enterprise Fund SECTION 17 010-01 (City of Eagan Park) TOTAL Total No. of Servs. Cost/Serv. Assessment 4 $1,901 $ 7,605 6 1,901 111408 4 1,901 7,605 1 $ 611 $ 611 1 16 Page 16. 1409d $1,901 $ 10901 $ 29,130 D. STORM SEWER Total Area (Acs.) Cost/Acre Assessment a.) Lateral East of Birch Pond Road: SECTION 16 010-30 (MN,Hosp. Serv. Assn.) -- -- $ 4,320 Blackhawk Glen First Addn. Outlot D -- -- 4,320 TOTAL $ 8,640 b.) Lateral West of Birch Pond Road: SECTION 16 010-30 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 17.6 $3,425 $ 60,282 SECTION 17 010-01 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 8.3 $3,425 $ 28,428 TOTAL 25.9 $ 88,710 c.) Trunk Area SECTION 17 **010-01 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 1,553,510 471,003 1,082,507 $0.048 Net 010-01 (City of Eagan Park) 446,490 446,490 0.048 Gross Credits Assessable 1,490,338 5,606,,337 Total Area(S.F.) (S.F.) Area (S.F.) Cost/S.F. Assessment SECTION 16 * 010-30 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 5,041,775 1,008,355 4,033,420 $0.048 $193,604 011-29 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 27,450 5,490 21,960 0.048 1,054 012-29 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 27,450 5,490 21,960 0.048 1,054 SECTION 17 **010-01 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 1,553,510 471,003 1,082,507 $0.048 $ 51,960 010-01 (City of Eagan Park) 446,490 446,490 0.048 21,432 TOTAL 7,096,675 1,490,338 5,606,,337 $269,104 * 20% street credit applied. ** Credit for Pond CP -6 and 20% street credit applied. Page 17. 1409d E. STREETS Assessable Total Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment SECTION 16 010-30 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 21068 $41.83 $ 86,506 Blackhawk Glen First Addition: outlot B 473 $41.83 $ 19,786 Outlot D 1,309 41.83 54,756 Outlot E 401 41.83 16,774 SECTION 17 010-01 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.) 2,200 $41.83 $ 92,028 TOTAL 6,451 $269,850 Page 18. 1409d u q O to an rt 3 t tr t'1 w C) 1- r+ 9 m o un 10 0 o coo chi J m c1 0 O In F m t•1 fn 00 n0 N In c+1 C" t•1 N N m rh yr ar d m �p •D d 10 m O JJ co In n O N In N h to I 1 1 O 1 t70 y .. .. 1 1 W ol +7 .O •O 1 1 N O• ai ..a Op tT •O to N N 3 CD In O 1 O O to 1 •--� ^.+ .•-i .-+ rn F 1 1 I rn to N �O ,-q N N tR th W t $ W ttl d •4 C N aD O In oC a 1 1 1 00 1 1 1 N44 I ^� I 1 1 1 1 I I O O O O O O N OD co u W En 3 t� vs yr q O O a a x z a u by O o 0 ..W. o pt� u+ la a i In i cn i i i i i D a,'+ 1 i 1 1 I 1 i Wy IW O C tU d z F .� to W U P4 "W7 m a In Z U 0 -~� 0 O I 1 1 I O 0 a-4 o N W ••a .Y• N rt N In m yr a w w 01 q h In � I I 1 e 1 g +� •^I ca ttl �O 1P1 n tf1 1 1 I 1 I I •--� 1 1 �O IO u^ t'•1 n 11 O v q 1 1 1 N 1 I 1 N 1 to •W , O 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 N N .L 1 I 1 tT 1 1 I In M N d m .,4 b � t? t? .d d q b q u W C m m m N a In In 0 W W 10 m vi m m N W q m O •.a m m m O a� o>H o 1, o> o> x 4N 0 L 41 Q In cn N N H V N U O b W to O O .+ O tT Cd W -i .a + .+ .4 W � .-t O R. to co O O O O to O O y � Y�iya/y •\ ,fin, w O a J Y fi o � w j a y /rte, m 4, / . ' _ /�• T x , a W a W2 v o, aW 6 T 0ar� "eIR PONS ;, R 7J _90 Y 77 NH_ I'S ZZ r .4 - 4 y •� « J- 0 w I ♦♦— lu ! W '•� IF "-k w i w O u ' Y O . V w -R w �• a o fo� IS OD ta Z d N Lu 1 w v Q Z Z O e ¢ _Z dZ m E Z W (~j IL C c o -1 Q "W7 Z ZujNa w� v Y C7 o- aCc � 3 a w \ 0ca cm m U \ Q < G •\ '\ 1- .0 O 0 J W fn 0' c. FIG. No. 2 ��M V -a C4 CI as V 0 C] .Y.LLJ i 1 Q I ba I,a aP O I J ^\\ 77 W ' � m !' CL (r LLJ 00OW �I 1 • •o WI W �. - '-ol • ota .R % cc Q a r c LO Y m U, qr O ¢ 0 to N W U) : w o M p W C v W Z Z 'z (3 „ 1 Z m E Z 2 U \ \ c a J CC W W C6 - _ O -)z 11 Z U us co o N<w`N OC C7 !� Y O — t, n Q CL W ¢O�a O y m T Y U \\� ¢t o� w m Oo m o =NO-- REPORT ADDENDUM ON BLACKHAWK GLEN (ASHBURY ROAD) UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS Project No. 454 EAGAN, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION This is an addendum to the feasibility report for Blackhawk Glen (Ashbury Road) dated October 15, 1985. The purpose of this addendum is to revise the preliminary assessment roll as presented in the original report. DISCUSSION The computation of the preliminary assessment roll for street improvements did not reflect the difference in the street design section between the portions of Ashbury Road east and west of Birchpond Drive. Since the east portion will be designed to a 7 ton strength versus the 9 ton strength on the west portion, different assessment rates have been computed. ASSESSMENTS Based on the above discussion, the new estimated assessment rates are as follows: Segment West of Birchpond Road $48.52/F.F. Segment East of Birchpond Road $36.66/F.F. Appendix C, Section E: Streets and the Summary Preliminary Assessment Roll have been revised to reflect this change and are attached. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engiaeer under the laws of the,State of Minnesota. Mark A. Ha son, P.E. Date: �! I l'- 5 Reg. No. 14260 2081d E. STREETS SECTION 16 010-30 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.)(1) 010-30 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.)(2) Blackhawk Glen First Addition:(2) Outlot B Outlot D Outlot E Assessable Total Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment 614 $48.52 $ 29,791 1,454 36.66 53,296 473 $36.66 $ 17,338 1,309 36.66 47,982 401 36.66 14,699 SECTION 17 010-01 (MN Hosp. Serv. Assn.)(1) 2,200 $48.52 $106,744 TOTAL 6,451 $269,850 (1) Segment west of Birchpond Road (2) Segment east of Birchpond Road 2081d b rt 00 O N G N rt 00 -7 rt d u'1 M N tL ID %D Ln u'1 t!1 .D M tD . t a,% N O rt %D O O to M cD cd to w u to o rn n L1 M �t O to M n N n N o0 H m I Cl)N M I` Vj- yr v} to oo N rn n O a -J m co ON 00 u•1 m rn %.0 O —4 rt a0 O %D Cn rl N O N l U''1 M O j O O Ch .t G I I 1 H I 1 I aN u'1 N %D t N H � 4J U b O PQ P4 I I I 00 1 I 1 N I C^ B w l7 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 ia++ o G O GO o0 O O W N 00 41 • P, vs [? U} •• vi 3 Q :j O O PG U d H >+ N of O O O z 04 d' .-+ O I N1 N W W M W T 1 I 1 { I 1 1 O w 44 •d 7 00 � � o O� Py W d O yr v} aj cn zcn w a "•t 06 J W U ca O >4 ti LL C..7 t.7 O v vl O rt rt O z C4 U O O O I rt 1 1 I O M 14 3 a 'AD 4 H H pL N . i N {rr�1 cn G+ 6 a a tq {a m -+ s oo ao tL G r•t to %D %D 1 I 1 M I M Lri1 N td 1 I 1 : u'1 Ln % kD %D U} � �. M n O W N m ON I O% +� tU G 1 I I N I 1 I N 1 u•1 G O • 4 1 I 1 0+ I 1 1 cn N cd to cn .7 to .a yr yr b •rJ <C ^ r. G •d a� cd G co m r 00 :j a p bo �+ Cd w to to to ca w W Pr. d m • d A. w w CLA. R W N o> o> o o nGi o> > � • 4 W A W H D, a >z1 $4 f1"+ 14 x H D, P U N a t H N N d a+ c0 u u u cn •.+ tL U rn 0 n t to •a W U �.,j •� .+ -'14 Dc O rJ O rl O e -i v +� U (. / �/ r v v H C W r+ O` � G G 7 O O cT ON O r• H cu HU 1 O O O c'1 �I1 N N H O O H U O N U cc O O 1-4 N U O N W r+ rt -4 rl rl (ra rt 14 P-1 ti no O O O O cn O O b rt 00 O N ---------- -------- -- ...... ...... ... .. ... . ... . .. ... .. ... . ........ . . . ........ . .... . ... . . .......... . ... .... .. ..... . ..... .... . ... . ..... - - - - - ------ - - - -- hfl . . .............. .. .... .. .... ..................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ..... ... . . . . . . . . . . . to ... .. ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... .... ....... . . . ... .. .. .. ... . ...... .... ...... ....... ... .. .. . ...... .. ... .. ... ... . . . .... .... ... -- --------- ----------- Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen PROJECT 443, O'NEIL POND (TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET) E. Project 443, O'Neil Pond (Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) -As a part of- the development of the Town Centre 70 & 100 Additions south of Yankee Doodle Road, trunk storm sewer ponding areas, lift stations and related force main outlets have to be constructed within the general vacinity of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue. Subsequently, in response to a petition submitted by the developers of the Town Centre Additions, a feasibility report has been prepared and presented to the Council on November 6 with the public hearing being scheduled for December 3. Enclosed (unnumbered) on the following pages is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. All property owners proposed to be effected by this proposed improvement have been notified of this public hearing and all notices published in the legal newspaper. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 443 (O'Neil Pond Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. �3 REPORT ON O'NIELL' S PONDS DP -4, DP -5 & DP -10 ) OUTLET TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 443 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1985 n Comm: 49356 nn Ai� %�ossPilfho0, l`4 se, fY//f_ dZ -P fYdd4 &&1, ./ M eggs .94 Pa" Afdomwdalla C ---- ---- --- e� _ 0 _l .2335 ?f/. `I+.r. G .,l%yk.,.a1 36 sl. &I, Af_...aaL 55113 612-636-4600 October 23, 1985 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: O'Niell's Ponds (DP -4, DP -5, & DP -10) Outlet Project No. 443 Our File No. 49356 Dear Mayor and Council: Oita G. Bonestroo. P.E. Robert k'. Rosene. P.E. Joseph C. Anderltk, P.F.. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E Turner, P.£. Juries C. Olson, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, F.E. Keith A. Gordon, P.E. Thomas E. '`oyes. P. E. Richard W. Foster, P E. Robert 0. schunichl. P.F. Afarv,n L..Sorvala, P.E. Donald C. Burgardt. F.E. Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E. Afark A Hanson. P.E. Ted A. Field, P.E Michael T. Rautmann. P.E. Robert R. l)e�lerle. 1' E. David O. Loskota, P. E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelskv Harlan M. Olson Transmitted herewith is our report for O'Niell's Ponds Outlet, Project No. 443. This report covers trunk storm sewer construction and includes a prelim- inary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. �/04/ 4� v- Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: October 23 1985 Reg. No. 14260 4 Approved by: Department of Public Works Date: /U - 3/- f-)- 154?.d SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer to provide outlets for storm water ponds within and adjacent to Robert O'Niell's property. Robert O'Niell's property includes approximately 120 acres located north of Yankee Doodle Road between Lexington Avenue and I -35E in Parcels 010-76 and 77, Section 10. The outlets for these ponds are required at this time due to the increase runoff generated from the Town Centre 70 and 100 Additions, Tomark Additions, Lexington Place Additions, Forrest Ridge, Duckwood Estates, and Duckwood Trails. The outlets for Ponds DP -4, 5, and 10, will discharge to LeMay Lake which in turn discharges to the Minnesota River through existing storm sewer systems. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: This project provides for the construction of storm sewer outlets from Pond DP -10' to Pond DP -5 and from Pond DP -5 to Pond DP -4. The outlet for Pond DP -4 to Pond DP -26, which is included entirely within I -35E right-of-way, was constructed as part of I -35E. However, the pipe between Pond DP -26 and Pond DP -4 was plugged because the land which includes Pond DP -4 was not ac- quired by Mn/DOT for ponding purposes at that time. Therefore, as part of the development of the Town Centre 70 and 100 Additions, it was required that the land necessary for Pond DP -4 and DP -5 be acquired. Both these ponds are lo- cated on Robert. O'Niell's property and are presently being acquired through the condemnation process. Pond DP -10 which is included in the Tomark Addition was dedicated as part of the Tomark 1st Addition. Page 1. 1541d To minimize the land acquisition for Pond DP -4 and Pond DP -5, the sizing of these ponds assumes only agricultural runoff from O'Niell's property. De- sign considerations for Pond DP -4 and DP -5 are listed below: INTERIM DESIGN Pond Storage Outflow Land Area Designation NWL HWL (ac.ft.) (cfs) (acres) Pond DP -4 874.8 879.8 25.8 8.4 5.9 Pond DP -5 840.0 860.0 41.0 5.0 3.7 Therefore, at the time when O'Niell's property develops additional storage will be required either through raising the HWL or by increasing the surface area of each pond. However, prior to raising the HWL in the future the impact of the higher elevation should be reviewed as it relates to upstream ponds and structures. The additional storage required for Pond DP -4 and Pond DP -5 once O'Niell's property develops is 11.6 and 12.0 acre-feet respectively. The out- flow rate from each pond will remain the same in the future due to the addi- tional storage being provided. Construction proposed herein includes defining Ponds DP -4 and DP -5 based on the interim design which will require the con- struction of dikes or berms. It is proposed that the excess material excavat- ed from Pond DP -4 be utilized to build the dikes in Pond DP -4 and a major por- tion of the dikes in Pond DP -5. Due to the existing terrain and the amount of trees adjacent to Pond DP -5 only a minor amount of excavation is proposed. To provide the outlet from Pond DP -10 to Pond DP -5 a 15" diameter gravity storm sewer is proposed along and across Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Ave- nue as shown on the attached drawing. The 15" storm sewer will connect to an existing 33" RCP beneath Lexington Avenue which presently discharges to Pond Page 2. 1541d DP -5. Due to the location of the easterly berm within Pond DP -5 it is necess- ary to extend the 33" RCP to the westerly edge of the berm. Final design con- siderations for Pond DP -10 are as follows: Pond Storage Designation NWL AWL .(ac. ft. Outflow Pond DP -10 848.0 860.0 15.4 4.6 The storm sewer outlet from Pond DP -5 to Pond DP -4 includes a submersible lift station located at the southwest corner of Pond DP -5. The submersible lift station will pump through a 14" force main constructed along Yankee Doodle Road connecting to an existing 48" storm sewer at Denmark Avenue. The 48" storm sewer constructed as part of Project No. 429, Town Centre 70 and 100 discharges into Pond DP -4. The outlet for Pond DP -4 to Pond DP -26 will require the removal of the plug within the existing outlet pipe. EASEMENTS & PERMITS: The only easements required for this project are those for Pond DP -4 and Pond DP -5 which are presently being acquired through condem- nation. Construction permits will be required from Mn/DOT and Dakota County for work within their respective right-of-ways. COST ESTIMATES: Detailed costs estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $388,430 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are es- timated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond inte- rest -but does not include any costs associated with the acquisition of requir- ed permits or easements. Page 3. 1541d ASSESSMENTS_ Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited pro- perty. All construction included herein is considered trunk with the excep- tion of the grading associated with defining each pond. Those areas which have not been previously assessed for trunk area storm sewer and benefit from this project are proposed to be assessed their trunk area assessment as part of this project. TRUNK RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: Agricultural/Single Family $0.048/sq.ft. Multiple Family $0.061/sq.ft. Commercial/Industrial $0.072/sq.ft. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Trunk $282,640 Pond Grading 105,790 Trunk Area Assessment $247,119 TOTALS .................... $388,430 $247,119 -$141,311 The anticipated project deficit is -$141,311. Page 4. 1541d PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Report Public Hearing Approve Plans Receive Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 5. 1541d November 6, 1985 Dedember 3, 1985 January 1986 March 1986 Fall 1986 September 1986 May 1987 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE O'NIELL'S PONDS (DP -4, DP -5 & DP -10) OUTLET TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 443 LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $1,000.00/L.S. $ 11000 23,000 Cu.yds. Common excavation (Pond DP -4 & DP -5) @ $1.50/cu.yd. 34,500 14,000 Cu.yds. Common borrow (Pond DP -5) @ $2.50/cu.yd. 35,000 260 Lin.ft. 33" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $40.00/lin.ft. 10,400 500 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 15,000 80 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 15" RCP w/steel casing @ $110.00/lin.ft. 8,800 2,750 Lin.ft. 14" DIP Force Main in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 60,500 4 Each Std. MH 4' dia. in pl. $950.00/each 3,800 60 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/lin.ft. 4,200 LUMP SUM Submersible lift station @ $90,000/L.S. 90,000 1 Each 15" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $500.00/each 500 1,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.50/lb. 1,500 8 Cu.yds. Rip rap in pl. @ $50.00/cu.yd. 400 1 Each Connect 16" DIP to ex. MR @ $500.00/each 500 1 Each Connect 14" DIP to ex. MH @ $500.00/each 500 1 Each Connect MH to ex. 33" RCP @ $500.00/each 500 1 Each Connect 33" RCP to ex. 33" RCP @ $300.00/each 300 1 Each Remove & relocate ex. 33" RCP flared end @ $400.00/ea. 400 500 Lin.ft. Silt fence @ $2.50/lin.ft. 1,250 12.0 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/each 12,000 3,510 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 3,510 Total $284,560 +5% Contingencies 14,230 $298,790 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 89,640 TOTAL............................................. $388,430 Page 6. 1541d APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL O'NIELL'S PONDS (DP -4, DP -5 & DP -10) OUTLET TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 443 TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER Parcel Total Area Credit Assessable Assessment Total Parcel (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Area (Sq.ft.) Rate Assessment SE 1/4, SECTION 10 0.81 Ac. $792/Ac. 642 Parcel 010-76 871,200 Street 20% 696,960 $0.061/s.f. $ 42,515 Parcel 010-77 3,165,010 Pond 174,240 2,392,620 $0.048/s.f. 114,846 Street 20% Parcel 040-75 44,430 Large Lot 1.02 Ac. $792/Ac. 808 Parcel 050-75 35,310 Large Lot 0.81 Ac. $792/Ac. 642 Parcel 060-75 38,115 Large Lot 0.88 Ac. $792/Ac. 697 SW 1/4, SECTION 11 Parcel 010-51 731,460 Street 20% Parcel 010-52 50,000 --- TOMARK 2ND ADDITION 585,170 $0.061/s.f. $ 353695 50,000 $0.061/s.f. 3,050 Outlot A 234,998 --- 234,998 $0.061/s.f. $ 143335 Outlot B 181,730 --- 181,730 $0.061/s.f. 11,086 Outlot D 4023370 Pond 18,030 384,340 $0.061/s.f. 23,445 TOTAL ............................. $247,119 Page 7. 1541d Y YANKEE_ DO --T --T I 'I t� KN08 y CRqSROA OF r`tTrJR GA 1"M C� U.S. POSTAL SERVICE zi 0-H Wn 1(4=07 1hL TRUNK ASSESSMENT AREA O'NEIL'S POND TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 443 EAGAK MINNESOTA ASSESSMENT AREA *AX u r scale in feet SONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK • ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting Enpino*ra St. Paul, Minn. Data: SEPT. 1985FIG. NO. 2 Comm. 49356 Ll Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen WILLIAMS& LARUE 1ST & 2ND ADDITIONS/SANITARY SEWER F. Project 450, Williams& LaRue 1st & 2nd Additions (Sanitary Sewer) -- Through a succession of public hearings initiated in November of 1984, a petitioned request for the installation of sanitary sewer to service the Williams & LaRue Addition under Project 422 was subsequently denied at the April 16, 1985, Council meeting. Subsequent to that action, several of the affected lots have proposed to subdivide into smaller lots requiring sanitary sewer service for final approval. Subsequently, a new feasibility report had been requested and authorized under Project 450 to service the Williams & LaRue 1st and proposed 2nd Additions. A copy of the referenced feasibility report is attached without page numbers for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of the public hearing to be held on December 3. Our consulting engineer and Public Works Director will discuss the details associated with this project accordingly. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 450 (Williams & LaRue 1st & 2nd Addition - sanitary sewer) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. REPORT Lon WILLIAMS & LARUE 1st & 2nd ADDITIONS UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 450 ailm EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1985 FILE No. 49362 %�arsedfiiaa, 2odeae,-�Q�.e�lrh fx fYddaci2�ed, .!%c. St. Pa4 M&%" �a, Rte, �4�� � y4���-s•, .%�. 2335 ?(/ % 36 Si, pain, A i...ot. 55113 Pka.r.: 6f2-636-4600 October 22, 1985 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Williams and Larue 1st & 2nd Addition Utility Improvements Project No. 450 Our File No. 49362 Dear Mayor and Council: Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. Robert IV. Rosene, P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.F.. Richard E-. Turner, P.E. James C. Olson, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keith A. Gordon. AF. - Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. Richard W. roster. P.E. Robert G. Schunirht• P.E. Afarvin L. Sorvala, P.E. Donald C. BurRardt. P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon. Y.E. Mark A. Hanson, P£ Ted K. Field. P.E. Michael T. Routmann. P.E. Robert R. PiEfferlc, P.E. David O. Loskota, P.E Charles A. Erickson Leo Af. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson Transmitted herewith is our report for Williams & Larue 1st and 2nd Addition, Project No. 450. This report covers sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer construction and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of fthe ,State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: October 22, 1985_ Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: / C�0- p4 - Department of Public Works Date: /U214-! 1521d SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer to serve Williams and LaRue 1st and the proposed 2nd Ad- dition and the adjacent property. The area being served by the proposed util- ities is located.in the northeast quadrant of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. -Williams and LaRue 2nd Addition is a proposed replat of Lots 3 and 4 of Williams and LaRue Addition. Williams and LaRue 2nd Addition will be served by Wescott Road which is presently a 20' wide gravel road. Wescott Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid street in the City of Eagan and is proposed to be upgraded in the very near future. At that time Williams and LaRue 2nd Addition will be res- ponsible for upgrading their portion of Wescott Road based on a residential equivalency. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with Master Utility Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: SanitaEy Sewer - Sanitary sewer to serve the Williams and LaRue Additions and the adjacent area is proposed to be constructed westerly along the south line of Parcel 044-53 as shown on the attached drawing. The proposed 8" diameter sanitary sewer will connect to an existing sanitary sewer located at the most southerly and westerly edge of Lexington Place South. The sewer will then continue south adjacent to the westerly edge of Pond JP -44 to serve Williams and LaRue Addition. It is also proposed to continue the sewer northerly to serve Parcel 043-53. Also included is a service wye and 10 feet of 4" dia- meter sewer service to each existing or proposed parcel or lot. Page 1. 1521d Water Main - Water main to serve Lots, 1, 4, & r of Williams and LaRue 2nd Ad- dition, is proposed to be constructed along the north edge of Wescott Road. The proposed 12" diameter water main is considered a trunk main as part of the trunk water main system for the City of Eagan. The trunk main will connect to the existing 18" trunk main in Lexington Avenue. Services - As previously indicated, sanitary sewer services are included in the sanitary sewer portion. Water services to serve Lots 1, 4, & 5 of Wil- liams and LaRue 2nd Addition include a 1" diameter service. It is proposed that a 6 inch diameter service be constructed to Parcel 016-25 located on the south side of Wescott Road directly across from Williams and LaRue 2nd Addi- tion. Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing the outlet pipe for Pond JP -44 as designated in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Pond JP -44 is included in the Williams and LaRue Additions and a portion of Parcel 030-53 located immediately to the east. The outlet for this pond will connect, to an existing 15" RCP storm sewer located in the Lexington Square Addition as shown on the attached drawing. The proposed storm sewer is designed not only to convey the outflow from Pond JP -44 but also 3.0 acres of direct runoff from the future low point of Wescott Road. Design calculations for Pond JP -44 are as follows: Pond Storage Outflow Designation NWL HL (ac.ft.) (cfs) Pond JP -44 890.7 895.7 8.2 1 Page 2. 1521d EASEMENTS & PERMITS: Easements are required for construction of the sanitary sewer and storm sewer. Construction permits for the extension of the water main will be required from Dakota County. The land area for easement required from each parcel is as follows: Parcel Permanent Temporary Description Easement Easement SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 044-53 0.27 ac. 0.40 ac. SW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 0.18 ac. 0.30 ac. WILLIAMS & LARUE IST ADDITION Lot 1 0.08 ac. 0.10 ac. Lot 2 0.06 ac. 0.09 ac. Lot 3 0.07 ac. 0.10 ac. Lot 4 0.02 ac. 0.06 ac. WILLIAMS & LARUE 2ND ADDITION Lot 2 0.07 ac. 0.10 ac. Lot 3 0.01 ac. 0.03 ac. Lot 4 0.04 ac. 0.06 ac. Lot 5 0.01 ac. 0.03 ac. Page 3. 1521d AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AREA SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 030-53 Parcel 043-53 Parcel 044-53 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 CONSTRUCTION AREA SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 030-53 Parcel 043-53 Parcel 044-53 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 WILLIAMS AND LARUE ADDITION WILLIAMS AND LARUE ADDITION Lot 1, 2, 3, 4 Lot 1, 2, 3, 4 Lexington Square Block 1, Lots 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: Sanitary Sewer $ 49,890 Water Main 19,640 Services 4,290 Storm Sewer 35,440 TOTAL ........................... $ 109,260 The total estimated project cost is $109,260 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest but do not include any costs associated with permit or easement acquisitions. Page 4. 1521d ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited pro- perties. A preliminary assessment roll based on estimated construction costs, is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All lateral as- sessments will be revised based on actual final costs incurred. An alternate preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B listing pending assess- ments should the Williams and LaRue 2nd Addition be final platted. SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of sanitary sewer to the abutting property it serves. It is proposed that Segment I, the east -west portion included within Parcel 044-53 be assessed entirely to that parcel based -on a lineal foot basis while Segment II, the north -south portion included within Parcel 044-53 be assessed entirely to Parcel 043-53 also based on a lineal foot basis. The front footage, which is the method used to deter- mine the assessment rate, is equal to two times the lineal footage. Segment III, the portion of sewer within Lots 1 through 4 of Williams and LaRue Addi- tion, will be assessed based on a lineal footage rate determined by dividing the costs of Segment III by the total length of Lots 1 through 4. Segment IV, the east -west sanitary sewer serving the proposed Lots 3, 4 and 5 of Williams and LaRue 2nd Addition, will be assessed equally to each lot combined with the cost to serve lots 1 and 2 of Williams and LaRue 2nd Addition included in Seg- ment III. WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess the lateral benefit from trunk water main rate for the 12" water main in Wescott Road. The short side of Lot 4 of Williams and LaRue was assessed under Project 404 for lateral benefit from trunk water main, therefore a 75' corner lot credit was given to the long side. It is also proposed to assess Parcel 016-25 the lateral benefit rate for that portion of water main constructed along its frontage less a 75' cor- ner lot credit. The 1985 rate is $11.88 per front foot for residential pro- perty. Page 5. 1521d SERVICES: Water services are proposed to be assessed equally to the abutting lots they serve, based on the diameter size. STORM SEWER: All storm sewer proposed herein is trunk. Therefore, it is pro- posed to assess those parcels which have not been previously assessed and ben- efit from this project their trunk area storm sewer assessment. Trunk area storm sewer rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize: Agricultural/Single Family $0.048/sq.ft. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project D. STORM SEWER Trunk $ 35,440 Cost Revenue Balance A. SANITARY SEWER $ 6,851 $ 35,440 $ Lateral $ 49,890 Approved) Trunk Lateral Assessment $ 49,890 $ 8,789 $ 49,890 $ 49,890 -- 0 - B. WATER MAIN 1521d Trunk $ 19,640 Lateral Equivalent Assessment $ 4,868 $ 19,640 $ 4,868 $ 14,772 C. SERVICES Lateral $ 4,290 Lateral Assessment $ 4,290 $ 4,290 $ 4,290 - 0 -- D. STORM SEWER Trunk $ 35,440 Trunk Area Assessment $ 6,851 $ 35,440 $ 6,851 -$28,589 Alternate (Williams and LaRue 2nd Addition - If Approved) Trunk $ 35,440 Trunk $ 8,789 $ 35,440 $ 8,789 -$26,651 Page 6. 1521d PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications/Acquire Easements Open Bid/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 7. 1521d November 6, 1985 December 3, 1985 Winter 1986 Spring/Summer 1986 Fall 1986 September 1986 May 1987 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE WILLIAMS AND LARUE IST AND 2ND ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 450 A.) SANITARY SEWER 1,290 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $17.00/lin.ft. $ 21,930 90 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer service in pl. @ $6.00/lin.ft. 540 7 Each . Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 6,650 25 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 1,500 2 Lin.ft. 8" DIP outside drop section @ $150.00/lin.ft. 300 9 Each 8" x 4" wye branch @ $50.00/each 450 1 Each Connect 8" to ex. MH @ $500.00/each 500 150 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,500 1.8 Acres Seed w/fertilizer mulch @ $1,000.00/ac. 1,800 1,380 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. _ 1,380 Total $ 36,550 +56 Contingencies 1,830 $ 38,380 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 11,510 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $ 49,890 Page 8. 1521d B.) WATER MAIN 330 Lin.ft. 12" DIP Water main @ $22.00/lin.ft. 15 Lin.ft. 6"- DIP Water main @ $12.00/lin.ft. 1 -Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 1 Each 12" Butterfly valve and box @ $750.00/each 1 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve: & box @ $400.00/each 1,500 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.50/lb. 1 Each Connect 12" DIP to existing 12" DIP @ $500.00/each 50 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 100 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $8.00/ton 0.4 Acre Seed w/fertilizer and mulch @ $1,000.00/ac. 345 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5Y Contingencies +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTALWATER MAIN .................................. Page 9. 1521d 7,260 180 1,000 750 400 2,250 500 500 800 400 13,. r $ 14,385 725 $ 15,110 4,530 $ 19,640 C.) SERVICES 60 Lin.ft. 1" Type K copper in pl. @ $8.00/lin.ft. $ 480 80 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water service in place @ $15.00/lin.ft. 1,200 3 Each 1" Corporation stop in pl. @ $50.00/each 150 1 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $400.00/each 400 3 Each 1" Curb stop and box @ $90.00/each 270 1 Each 12"x 6" Tee in place @ $500.00/each 500 140 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 140 1.0 Acre Total $ 3,140 790 Lin.ft. +5% Contingencies 160 Total $ 3,300 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 990 TOTAL SERVICES ...................................... $ 43290 D.) STORM SEWER 590 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. $ 15,340 200 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 4,400 3 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 2,850 8 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 480 1 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 400 4 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 200 1 Each Connect MH to ex. 15" RCP @ $500.00/each 500 1.0 Acre Seed w/fertilizer & mulch @ $1,000.00/Ac. 13,000 790 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 790 Total $ 25,960 +5% Contingencies 1,300 $ 27,260 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 8,180 TOTAL STORM SEWER .................................. $ 35,440 SUMMARY A. SANITARY SEWER $ 49,890 B. WATER MAIN 19,640 C. SERVICES 4,290 D. STORM SEWER 35,440 TOTAL ................. $109,260 Page 10. 1521d APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WILLIAMS AND LARUE 2ND ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 450 A. SANITARY SEWER Parcel Assessable Total Total Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment WILLIAMS AND LARUE IST ADDITION Lot 1 1 Lot 1 179 $ 38.28 $ 6,852 Lot 2 135 $ 38.28 5,167 Lot 3 156 $ 38.28 5,971 Lot 4 140 $ 38.28 5,359 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 $15,670(2) Parcel 043-53 250 $ 38.28 $ 9,569 Parcel 044-53 330 $ 38.28 12,632 TOTAL 1,190 $45,550(1) ALTERNATE (IF FINAL PLATTED) Parcel No. of Total Description Lots Cost/Lot Assessment WILLIAMS AND LARUE 2ND ADDITION Lot 1 1 $ 3,134 $ 3,134 Lot 2 1 $ 3,134 3,134 Lot 3 1 $ 3,134 3,134 Lot 4 1 $ 3,134 3,134 Lot 5 1 $ 3,134 3,134 TOTAL 5 $15,670(2) (1) Project cost does not include east -west sanitary sewer serving Lots 3, 4 & 5 of Williams and LaRue 2nd Addition. (2) Project cost includes east -west sanitary sewer serving Lots 3, 4 & 5 of Williams and LaRue 2nd Addition ($4,340) plus estimated assessment to Lots 3 and 4 of Williams and LaRue Addition ($5,971 + $5,359 = $11,330). Page 11. 1521d B. WATER MAIN -- (LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK) Parcel Assessable Description Footage WILLIAMS AND LARUE 1ST ADDITION Lot 4 205(1) NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel -016-25 205(1) TOTAL 410 ALTERNATE (IF FINAL PLATTED) Parcel Description WILLIAMS AND LARUE 2ND ADDITION Lot 1 Lot 4 Lot 5 TOTAL (1) Includes 75' corner lot credit C. SERVICES (WATER) Parcel Description NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 TOTAL ALTERNATE (IF FINAL PLATTED) WILLIAMS AND LARUE 2ND ADDITION No. of Lots No. of Services l 1 Rate/F.F. Cost/Lot 811 811 811 Cost/Service $2,870(2) Total Assessment $ 2,434 $ 2,434 $ 4,686 Total. Total Assessment $2,870 $2,870 Lot 1 1 $ 473(3) $ 473 Lot 4 1 473 473 Lot 5 1 473 473 -TOTAL 3 $1,419 (1) Assumes 6" Diameter Service (2) Assumes 1" Diameter Service Page 12. 1521d D.) STORM SEWER a.) Trunk Area Parcel Area Credit Description (Sq.Ft.) (Sq.Ft.) SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 030-53 195,300 Large lot WILLIAM AND LARUE 1ST ADDITION Assessable Total Area (Sq.Ft. Rate/Sq.Ft. Assessment 4.5 Ac. $792/Ac. $ 3,564 Lot 1 50,120 Large lot 1.15 Ac. $792/Ac. 911 Lot 2 37,800 Large lot 16,500 $0.048 792 Lot 3 43,680 Large lot 16,500 $0.048 792 Lot 4 39,200 Large lot 16,500 $0.048 792 TOTAL $ 6,851 ALTERNATE (IF FINAL PLATTED) WILLIAM AND LARUE 2ND ADDITION Lot 1 23,940 Pond (3,940) 20,000 $0.048 960 Lot 2 21,840 Pond (780) 21,060 $0.048 1,011 Lot 3 13,020 13,020 $0.048 625 Lot 4 12,040 Pond (2,400) 9,640 $0.048 463 Lot 5 12,040 Pond (2,400) 9,640 $0.048 463 $ 3,522 ki Page 13. 15214 Parcel Description SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 030-53 Parcel 043-53 Parcel 044-53 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WILLIAMS AND LARUE IST & 2ND ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 450 Sanitary Water Sewer Main $ 9,569 12,632 WILLIAMS AND LARUE IST ADDITION Lot 1 $ 6,852 Lot 2 5,167 Lot 3 5,971 Lot 4 5,359 ALTERNATE (IF FINAL PLATTED) WILLIAMS AND LARUE 2ND ADDITION Lot 1 $ 3,134 Lot 2 3,134 Lot 3 3,134 Lot 4 3,134 Lot 5 3,134 1521d Services Storm (Water) Sewer $3,564 $ 2,434 $2,870 Total $ 3,564 9,569 12,632 $ 5,304 Page 14. $ 911 $ 7,763 792 5,959 792 6,763 $ 2,434 792 8,585 $ 811 $ 443 $ 960 $ 5,378 1,011 4,145 625 3,759 811 473 463 4,881 811 473 463 4,881 Page 14. LJ D W Q 012-76 z O f" _z' X 15 14 Ld J 043-53 1 044-53 t IE,I i l l l Seqrr ent I PROPOSED 8"SANITARY SEWER I F WILLIAMS el N.W.L. LARUE 2 H.W.L. ADDITION Vr i 4 , SP,gment ;]Y i 016-25 WILLIAMS & LARUE 1st & 2nd ADDITIONS UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER EAGAN. MINNESOTA POR! D JP -44 :890.7 :895.7 030-53 PROPOSED I"? WILLIAMS B LARUE' i 2nd ADDITION iv WESCOTT Ex. 8" P.V.C. Sanitary Sewer 041-53 I• t i ""4- r..i N 0 100 200' 400 Graphic Scale in Feet BONESTR'00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK $ ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: October, 1985 PROJ. N o. Comm. 49362 rJ o N N I Ex. 8" P.V.C. Sanitary Sewer 041-53 I• t i ""4- r..i N 0 100 200' 400 Graphic Scale in Feet BONESTR'00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK $ ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: October, 1985 PROJ. N o. Comm. 49362 rJ o 012-76 * - LOT CREDIT W D Z W a X'i w J 043-53 1 044-53 Ex. 18 " D.I . P. Water Main I WILLIAMS L RUE2 ADDITION f POND JP -44 RW L. = 890.7 H.W.L. =895.7 030-53 PROPOSED WILLIAMS 8 LARUE 2nd ADDITION I � I i 514 4 WESCOTT i.: v = _ ;, : �'tr• ': Vit: ....�..A iti•.. :� f 041-53 r+ -�� PROPOSED 12" WATER MAIN LATERAL BENEFIT OM 75* TRUNK W TERMAIN # _1= iIN ; "TC 016-25 , :::L, c �. .:. �- WILLIAMS & LARUE 1st & 2nd ADDITIONS UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN EAGAN. MINNESOTA AI 0 100 200 400 Graphic Scale in Feet BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: October, 1985 P R O J. No. Comm. 49362 4 6 0 z W Q 043-53 044-53 I POND JP -44 WILLIAMS N.W.L. =890.7 Ek 2 H.W.L. =895.7 LARUE ADDITION 030-53 PROPOSED -9._—WILLIAMS & LA 2nd ADDITION 4 WESCOTT 18" PROPOSED 4, STORM SEWER 016-25 WILLIAMS & LARUE 1st & 2nd ADDITIONS UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER EAGAN. MINNESOTA l :�'' ' i.......• 041-53 N - Ex. 15" Storm Sewer -0 100' 200 400' Graphic Scalein Feet BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK 3 ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: october, 1985 P R O J. NO'. Comm. 49362 450 012-76 04.3-53 1 044-53 I T T I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I r . WILLIAMS 81 LARUE ADDITION I PON D JP -44 N.W.L. =890.7 H.W.L. =895.7 030-53 VII ESC PROPOSE WILLIAMS 8k LARUE 2nd ADDITION 016-25 WILLIAMS & LARUE 1st & 2nd ADDITIONS TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER. ASSESSMENT EAGAN. MINNESOTA ....s...A.:Yt. 041-53 LEI l� :L �c H KEY ®TRUNK STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT AREA 0 100 200 400 Graphic Scale in Feet BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK a ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: October, 1985 JfPROJ. No. Comm. 49362 450 Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen POND LP55 & 55A (STORM SEWER OUTLET) G. Project 448R, Pond LP55 & 55A (Storm Sewer Outlet) -- On July 16, 1985, a public hearing was held for Project 448 to discuss the proposed storm sewer outlet for Pond LP55 & 55A. As a result of the comments received, the Council continued the public hearing to an unspecified later date to allow staff to revise the report accordingly to address the concerns raised and to review the proposed pond elevations with the Department of Natural Resources. This work has now been completed and the revised feasibility report (Project 448"R") has now been completed and has been reviewed with the various affected property owners through a series of neighborhood meetings. A copy of the revised feasibility report is attached without page numbers* for the Council's information and review during the public hearing. All notices have been republished in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of the public hearing to be held on December 3. The consulting engineer and Public Works Director will be available to discuss the various options contained within this report at that hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 448"R" (Pond LP 55 & 55A - Storm Sewer Outlet) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications for the appropriate option(s). *Note: The feasibility report for this project will be included as a part of the Additional Item packet on Monday. K Agenda Information demo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen - GROUP W UPDATE A. Group W/Update--Jim Commers, local manager for Group W, has requested time to appear before the City Council and provide a brief status report on the progress of cable installation and rate of subscribership within the City of Eagan. General questions that the City Council might have regarding cable television are certainly appropriate. Any specific complaints you have regarding construction, restoration or other issues relating to a property owner can always be channeled through this office or directly to Ralph Campbell. There is no action on this item. Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING EXPANSION B. Authorization to Proceed With Public Works Facilities Expansion - The architectural firm of Jack Boarman and Associates was hired during the, early summer of 1985 to prepare a needs analysis for consideration of an expansion to the existing Public Works building. An employee committee was formed and has met on numerous occasions to review all building needs with the architect. The Public Works Committee has met on two occasions to review concepts that were prepared by the architect taking into consideration present and future needs for administrative space, specific shop work areas and vehicular storage. At a special City Council workshop session held on November 21, 1985, three (3) concepts were presented by the architect for review and consideration. It was determined that Scheme C, at an estimated budget of $1,525,000 is the most practical solution for meeting the present and short term needs for a Public Works facility. It was also determined that dollars would be generated from a 1985 and 1986 General Government and Public Utilities Fund allocation, General Fund revenue sharing and a loan from the Consolidated Improvement Debt Fund which is to be paid back over a five (5) year period of time. There have been no formal improvements made to the Public works garage for administration, workshop areas or vehicular storage since the early 1970's when the City had approximately 90 miles of street, one-half the sewer, water and storm sewer infrastructure and a population of approximately 14,000. With the exception of a small, metal pole barn that was erected in 1977, there have been no other improvements made to the Public Works garage and the system has approximately doubled while the population is at approximately 33,000. The City Administrator and Director of Finance were authorized to prepare a budget which will be made available with the Admini- strative Packet on Monday, December 2. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a budget of $1,525,000 for the purpose of expanding the existing Public Works garage facility to meet both present and future needs of the Public Works & Parks Maintenance Departments. �7 Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS A. Annual Review of Planned Unit Developments --At a special joint meeting of the City Council and Advisory Planning Commission, held on November 12, 1985, action was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission to approve annual renewal of fourteen (14) active, planned developments. The PUD that were approved are as follows: Blue Cross/Blue Shield 81-3 Cedar Cliff 80-2 Cinnamon Ridge 81-2 Eagan Heights Commercial 82-2 Eagan Hills West 79-1 Eagan Woods Office Parks 74-2 Gopher -Eagan 76-1 Laukka-Beck 74-0 Lexington South 75-1 Mission Hills 77-1 Norwest 83-0 South Delaware Hills 74-5 Splashland Water Park s 82-1 Winkler -Jackson 82-3 Two (2) PUD's were continued for further discussion. The Blackhawk Park PUD will be reviewed at a future joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission. The Eagan 40 Planned Development was reviewed, however, does expire and will be reviewed as a separate agenda item. There is some question regarding procedure for the extension of planned development agreements and, therefore, public policy must be determined by the City Council after review of the City Attorney's office opinion on extension of planned development agreements referenced on page_ in the attached letter. Since the City Council participated in both the public hearing and review of each planned unit development at the special workshop session, there is no need to reopen discussion unless there are members of the public interested in any of the PUD's. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the annual review of the Planned Unit Developments as considered and recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. E PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN MICHAEL J. MAYER Dale Runkle Eagan City Planner 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 November 18, 1985 RE: Extension of Planned Development Agreements Dear Dale: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 454.4224 At the recent joint meeting of the Eagan City Council and Advisory Planning Commission, the question arose as to whether it is necessary to hold a public hearing in regard to an extension of a planned development and agreement and whether such hearing would also have to be held before the Advisory Planning Commission. The City Code does not contain provisions for the extension of a planned development agreement. 411.20 Subd. 8.E. does provide for annual review and termination by the Council at its sole discretion at which time the Council may cause the zoning to revert to the underlying designation. Within the Code, the creation of a PD is a zoning authority requiring the regular public hearings relative to rezoning. The only relevant State Statute (4462.3595) states that a PD may be treated as a conditional use. In conclusion, neither state law nor City Code require a public heraing to extend a PD. However, if the PD is to be terminated or allowed to expire and the zoning changed from PD to some underlying designation, public hearings should be held as in any other rezoning. Note that it would appear that the City has great leeway in amending its own Code. Also, the costs (who pays) of notice for public hearing are a consideration. DGK:ras fq Very truly yours, HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. 6nnvl��Z� Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-one EXTENSION OF EAGAN 40 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT B. Request For Extension of Eagan 40 Planned Development -- The Eagan -40 Limited Partnership Planned Development was granted for a ten (10) year period of time. Since the PD does expire in January'1986, the developer is requesting two (2) three-year extensions. This item and Mr. Dolan's request was reviewed at the Special Workshop Session with the Planning Commission held on November 12, 1985. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny two (2) three-year extensions, and approve or deny the Planned Development review as considered in the joint session. 506 Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-two DAKOTA COUNTY PLAT I/CORRECTION/BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION C. Dakota County Plat I, Correction to Recorded Boundary Descrip- tion (Dakota County Surveyor) -- We have received correspondence from the Dakota County Surveyor indicating their discovery of certain errors, omissions or defects in the description of the previously approved final plat for Dakota County Plat I Addition. In accordance with state statutes, any corrections to a recorded final plat must receive concurrence from the jurisdictional municipality. These proposed revisions have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and it has been determined that there is no adverse impact to the City of Eagan by this correction. Therefore, staff is recommending favorable concurrence with this correction. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Certificate of Correction to the plat of Dakota County Plat I and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents_ PRELIMINARY PLAT/TOWN CENTRE 70 2ND ADDITION D. Preliminary Plat/Town Centre 70 2nd Addition -- A public hearing was held by the City Council at the November 19, 1985, City Council meeting to consider a preliminary plat revision of Town Centre 70 2nd Addition. It was determined at that public hearing that the City Council does not normally hold a public hearing for preliminary plats, and, therefore the hearing was continued for consideration and review by the Advisory Planning Commission at their November 26, 1985, meeting. The Planning Commission did proceed with the public hearing to consider a preliminary revision for Town Centre 70 and is recommending approval of the new plat to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to -the Planning and Engineering Department report, copies enclosed in pages OPO' through Because the Advisory Planning Commission minutes were not available when this packet was prepared, they will be included with the Additional Information on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny revision of the preliminary plat for Town Centre 70 2nd Addition. f N CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - TOWN CENTER 70 Z'-* Roo APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND COMPANY LOCATION: YANKEE AND PILOT KNOB ROADS EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 22, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 17, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING The public hearing for the Town Center 70 project containing the Rainbow- Foods and strip commercial -center will take place at the City Council meeting on Wednesday, November 6, 1985. The subject area will require a replatting to create two separate lots and the vacation of existing easements along Outlot D. This replatting will be subject to the City Engineering require- ments/review. The issue of parking stall size should be addressed as the submitted drawings show 9' X 19' interiorstalls with the 24' drives required by the City. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The applicant is proposing no changes in the grading of the Second Addition from the grading performed by the applicant on the First Addition. UTILITIES: The installation of sanitary sewer,. watermain and services under City Contract 85-8 will be adequate to serve this proposed development with public utilities. -This project is very near completion. STREETS: City Contract 85-8 also provides for the installation of Town Centre Drive and a 48' wide 9 ton loading capacity City street, City Contract 85-9 provides for the installation of Denmark Avenue, a 52' wide 9 ton loading capacity City collec-tor. street. The City anticipates both streets will be open to traffic by mid November, weather permitting. RIGHT-OF=WAY/EASEMENTS: Right-of-way dedication for Town Centre 70 Drive & Denmark Avenue occurred under the previously platted Town Centre 70 Addition. Because the Town Centre 70 Addition plat already exists, the City will require this developer to petition to vacate existing lot line utility and drainage easements. The vacation of the existing utility and draind'ge easements must occur prior to.or concurrent with final plat approval.. -- The city will require a 20' wide utility easement over the watermain fire loop yet to be constructed. The dedication of all other easements shall be in accordance with -City Code. PRELIMINARY PLAT - TOWN CENTRE 70 OCTOBER 22, 1985 PAGE 2 4 ASSESSMENTS: All trunk area related assessments for this proposed development are either levied or pending. This development has fulfilled its trunk area related assessment obligations. CONDITIONS: 1) The applicant shall submit: A) A detailed landscape plan. B) A detailed grading plan with berming. C) A lighting plan showing lumination areas. 2) The building shall be architecturally treated the same on all sides. 3) A Conditional Use Permit will be required for the propose signage. 41 The applicant shall be responsible for installing a 6" watermain loop for fire protection. The location and layout shall be approved by City Staff. 5) The applicant shall dedicate a 20' utility easement over the watermain fire loop and hydrant leads. 6) All applicable standard engineering conditions shall apply. 7) The existing easements shall be vacated prior. to final plat approval. SY L .2 i SY L ' SITE PLAN ^ � -~------- - ' 0- = J _DAKOTA COUNTY ROAD NO. 20 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD j0 Oil lz 4w 0 '' � / •3 y .Z � lj 1 s8 Iti tvza 0�•5 �Oiy iof •0(i1VE "fin+°'•[ 1 �• 231" T2 _ a' \ \ /•• SPE � d �'� _ O it4� a/• I I If M�••�y 164, 41 'Vow T / r a 04,7no7- A 100��� 2 �' iig ~ " /+~ / LIOIifiyTs /►! P {�O yj'f• i i2.. >a.ti. rs..�i a i 4• 7 Ax W . /2 � � .�,r � P t'l tis • � �irn. � �_ TI _ �eu.•rry_ �r � o ry U DUCKWOOD \ �o Ia W a f IJ O I 2 Y D „� W /� Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-three PRELIMINARY PLAT/NORWEST 3RD ADDITION E. Preliminary Plat for Norwest 3rd Addition Consisting of One Lot Containing 123,710 Square Feet on 2.84 Acres --Due to conditions set by the Advisory Planning Commission at their meeting on November 26, 1985, -'staff requests continuance of this item to the December 17, 1985, City Council meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the preliminary plat for Norwest 3rd Addition to the December 17, 1985, City Council meeting. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PYLON SIGN/NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING F. Conditional Use Permit for an Advertising Sign (Naegele Outdoor Advertising) Located on Osman Temple Property in Part of the NE 1/4 of Section 4, Near Highway 13 and I -494--A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their meeting on November 26,. 1985, to considE!r a conditional use permit to allow a 2 -directional, lighted pylon sign on Osman Temple property located east of highway and south of I-494. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the conditional use permit- All ermitAll setback requirements have been met and the height of the sign is also within City Code limitations. Since the sign abuts two highways, the City Council shall also determine the size of advertising area. The drawing included with the Planner's report shows an area of 756 squa e feet. A copy of the Planner's report is enclosed on pages through _4�j . Because minutes from the Advisory Planning Commission meeting are not yet available, they will be included with the Additional Information packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To approve or deny the conditional use permit for a 2 -directional, lighted -..advertising sign requested by Naegele Outdoor Advertising Company'= and 2) determine the allowable size of said sign. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY.,_ LOCATION: NE a OF SECTION 4 EXISTING ZONING: R.B., ROADSIDE BUSINESS DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 22, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 15, 1985 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICAITON SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted to allow a 2 directional lighted pylon sign located east of Highway 13 and south of I-494 on Osman Temple property. COMMENTS: The proposed location of the sign is approximately 423 feet from Hwy 13 and 20 feet from the I-494 right-of-way both of which are within City Code setback requirements. The (� total height of the sign will be 40' which is also within Code. Since the sign is abutting 2 highways, the City Council shall determine the size of advertising area.. The submitted drawing shows an area 10.5' X 36' for a total of 378 sq ft per side or 756 total sq ft. If approved, the sign shall be subject to: 1) All conditions as imposed by the City Council. 2) The one time sign ordinance fee of $2.50/foot of advertising area. �(ooc -sport S 1 c.N jot 9 - D,.o-& Puu-li HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN MICHAEL J. MAYER November 15, 1985 Mr. Dale Runkle City Planner Eagan Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Naegle Advertising Sign Adjacent to 494 on Lost Spur Property Dear Dale: if AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 454.422A It is our understanding that Naegle Sign Company has proposed that it be allowed to erect an advertising sign on a parcel of property recently acquired by the Lost Spur just north of the Lost Spur and south of 494. It is understanding that this sign would exceed the maximum size under the sign ordinance and would be located more that 300 feet away from the business pylon sign located at the Lost Spur. The sign described would be an advertising pylon sign as defined in Ordinance Section 4.20, Subd. 1C. It would appear that the sign presently at the Lost Spur would be considered a pylon business sign within the same definition. To the best of our information, the proposed sign would be located within a PD area with an RB designation pursuant to the 12/1/84 zoning map. Thus, the advertising sign would comply with Ordinance Section 4.20, Subd. 2A. Apparently the sign would exceed 250 square feet which may be allowed under Ordinance Section 4.20, Subd.4C, when an advertising sign is located adjacent to a limited access highway and the Council makes a determination that such exception would be appropriate. The more serious issue appears to be the location of proposed advertising sign relative to the buisness sign already existing on the Lost Spur property. Section 4.20, Subd.4A of the City Code provides that, "No advertising sign shall be located on a platted lot which contains a Business Sign or within 300 feet of any Business Sign measured on the same side of the street". To the best of our information, which should be verified by staff, it would appear that the sign would not be located on the same platted lot as the Lost Spur sign. In addition, it may be that the sign is more than 300 feet from the .s�i Mr. Dale Runkle November 15, 1985 Page Two existing business sign. Even if the sign is something less than 30 feet from the Lost Spur sign, it our opinion that the Planning Commission and City Council would have some discretion since the two signs are not necessarily on the "same side of the street". Other portions of the Code suggest that if signs are not located on the same side of the street, the distance between them may be decreased. DGK:cjb Sincerely, HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. David G. Keller C c, -CE QUARRY FIAWRW - - 1 `, . %11 rn CA ft. 4y �m Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-four REQUEST/EXTENDED HOURS OF OPERATION/CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PK. G. Contract 85-5, Request for Extended Hours of Operation (Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer) -- The staff will be receiving a written request from the contractor (A.R.!. Contracting, Inc.) requesting a variance to City Code 4.30, Subdivision 5, which restricts the hours of operations from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Due to the early onset of severe winter weather conditions, they are requesting a variance to allow them to work 24 hours a day. Their written letter of request defining the actual days and duration of this request will be Forwarded to. the Council as a part of the Administrative Packet. Due to the fact that this work is confined to an industrial area, it is not anticipated there would be any adverse impact associated with the construction noise or lights from these extended hours of operations with the possible exception of the Adelmann property located across from LaFonda's. That particular property owner will be informed of the Council's consideration of this request at the December 3 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny a variance to the City's restrictive hours of opeartions to allow construction activity from A.M. to PRELIMINARY PLAT/YORKTON DEVELOPMENT H. Preliminary Plat for an Office/Warehouse for Yorkton Development -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on Tuesday, November 26, 1985, to consider an application that was submitted for a preliminary plat approval of two (2) buildings on two lots east of State Highway 49 and south of Becker Road. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the preliminary plat as presented. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department reports, copies are enclosed on pages through A copy of the Advisory Planning Commission r inutes will be distributed as a part of the Administrative packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for an office warehouse use identified as Yorkton Development. 63 'k 4' CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: YORKTON DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: SEa OF SECTION 13 EXISTING ZONING: L-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 26, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 7, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for Preliminary Plat approval of 2 buildings on 2 lots east of state highway 49 and south of Becker Road. ZONING & LAND USE: The entire site is ±43.2 acres and zoned Light Industrial. The applicant is platting 2 lots, lot 15 ± 2.2 acres and lot 16 ±2.3 acres and leaving the remaining ± 38.7 acres as an outlot. The topography generally flows to a rather large low area near the center of the entire development. A proposed pond is shown on the site plan in this area and will act as a detention area for all of the proposed lots within the development. An existing slough near .the souteast portion of the site will be used as a building site in the future. Adjacent land uses in Eagan are industrial as well except for an agricultural strip fronting on Hwy 49. West Publishing and part of the Gopher -Eagan P.D. are also to the west. Inver Grove Heights (Delaware Avenue) forms the eastern property line. SITE PLANNING: Lots 15 & 16 will share .a single common access on to Hwy 49. Staff has asked the- applicant to widen this drive to 36' to allow for easier turning by large trucks. Both buildings meet all setback requirements. At this time, the parking stalls are shown to be 9' x 201, 41 per building. Both buildings will have the same floor plan with the 4,320 S.F. office area in front of the 18,432 S.F..warhouse area. The office area will have a brick exterior, dark glass with annodized aluminum framing. The rest of the warehouse area will be block wall and below the 30' height restriction of City Code. The loading bays will be approximately 5,000 S.F. and the curbed bituminous surface appears to be of ample size for easy vehicular movement. Yorkton Development typically desires to lease to 'high tech' industries. One of the proposed tenants for these buildings is a printing company. These 2 platted lots will be subject to the Parks Dedication fee of .04 at the time of building permit issuance. G� YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH NOVEMBER 26, 1985 PAGE 2 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading over this proposed development proposes to maintain the existing drainage patterns in general. The developer proposes on filling a slough area presently located over proposed lots 12 & 13 and expanding a low area over proposed lot 9 to incorporate the storage volume lost in filling the slough. This is in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan as illustrated in figure 1. The pond this development proposes on relocating is pond GP -7 on the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. This pond has a normal water elevation of 864 with a 100 year storm elevation of 872. The cora,:m_sponding volume this pond requires amounts to 63.9 acre feet. This development will ultimately be responsible for the necessary :regrading to provide the required storage volumes. Staff does not expect -he need for this ponding area until further development of this site occurrs. The preliminary grading plan appears feasible with the exception of lots 15 & 16, the two lots proposed with this development. The proposed grading and the proposed common lot line of lots 15 & 16 will not allow for a common access from Hwy 149. The preliminary grading plan proposes a 5' drop accross lot 16 to lot 15 in this area. The developer must revise his final grading plan to facilitate a common access if allowed by Mn Dot for final plat consideration. The grading plan for the final plat must also be on a drawing to scale so that Staff may determine the amount of storage volume proposed in the new pond. SANITARY SEWER: The City has a 12" trunk sanitary sewer main running northerly through this property about 400' west of Delaware Tr (C.R. 63). This line is deep enough and of sufficient capacity to provide service to this development. This line discharges into a MWCC controlled and operated lift station at Becker Rd. Staff reviewed the capacity of this lift station with MWCC for the U.P.S. development located immediately to the north of this proposed development. The consensus of that meeting is that MWCC will not require any upgrading of this lift station in the immediate future. MWCC is considering upgrading this lift station within the next 5 years. Because the 12" sanitary sewer line is in place, the developer will have only to construct services off of it to both lot 15 and lot 16. WATERMAIN: The City has an existing 16" trunk watermain along the east side of Hwy 149. The City also -has an 8" watermain along the west side of Delaware Tr. This line ends where it provides service to the trailer park in Inver Grove Heights. As a part of the U.P.S. development, the City upgraded C.R. 63A (Becker Road) and also constructed an 8" watermain within it from Hwy 149 to Delaware Tr. All of these lines are of sufficient size and capacity to provide service to this proposed development. M, YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH NOVEMBER 26, 1985 PAGE 3 However, Staff recommends that the 8" watermain within Delaware Tr be extended to loop into the newly constructed watermain within Becker Rd when the developer develops the lots adjacent to Delaware Tr. To provide service to lots 15 & 16, the developer will be able to tap services off the existing 16" watermain within the Hwy 149 right-of-way. STREETS: State Hwy 149 borders this proposed development along the westerly boundary with C.R. 63A (Becker Rd) and C.R. 63 (Delaware Tr) bordering this development on its north and east respectively. The County is in the process of turning Becker Rd back to the City. Otherwise, Delaware Tr is under the jurisdic- tion of Dakota County, T.H. 149 is under the jurisdiction of Mn Dot and Becker Rd will be under the jurisdiction of the City. The City recently completed upgrading Becker Rd to 9 ton standards resulting from the U.P.S. development and expected increased traffic because of it. If Mn Dot allows access to these proposed lots, this development should provide for a right turn lane in addition to any other conditions it may require. Because -Delaware Tr is a County road and also is located within Inver Grove Heights, upgrading this road to City of Eagan standards from Hwy 149 to Becker Rd may be difficult. The City cannot hold a developer responsible for upgrading his half of the roadway because it is currently a rural roadway section and upgrading to an urban section will require lowering of the grade line. Also, coordination with Inver Grove Heights may present a problem. For these reasons, Staff recommends the developer prepay street upgrading assessments for Delaware Tr when the time comes for development of the property along Delaware Tr. RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENTS: This development shall dedicate the entire right-of-way for Becker Rd over the westerly 562' and the southerly half 40' right-of-way for Becker Rd over the remainder. Also, the developer shall dedicate a 40' half right- of-way for Delaware Tr. This development shall dedicate a 20' permanent easement for future trunk storm sewer west of the existing sanitary sewer easement. Also this development shall dedicate a 10' utility easement along the rear lot line of lot 15 for the future storm sewer. To make construction of this storm sewer line easier in the future, this development shall dedicate a 30' temporary easement westerly of the previously mentioned storm sewer easement. This easement shall expire upon completion of this particular section of trunk storm sewer. This development shall also be responsible for dedicating the required ponding easement for 46 YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH NOVEMBER 26, 1985 PAGE 4 63.9 acre feet of storage along with necessary easements to con- struct the future outlet to pond GP -7. Finally, this development shall be responsible for dedicating all other easements as the City Code requires. ASSESSMENTS: The City's record indicate this area being assessed for trunk area water and trunk area sanitary sewer at the appro- - priate rates. This leaves trunk area storm sewer and lateral benefit from trunk sanitary sewer and trunk watermain assessments as the responsibility of this proposed development. The following table lists the assessments Staff proposes this development is responsible for. The City will determine the final amounts based on the assessment rate at the time of the final plat approval and final plat areas and dimensions. This development shall be responsible for all costs associated with this development. �7 Est'd. 1985 Description Quantity Rate Amount Trunk Area Storm Sewer 196,020 S.F. $0.072/S.F. $14,113 Proposed for Lot 15 & 16 Lateral Benefit from 545 F.F $19.57/F.F. $10,666 Trunk Watermain Proposed Lots 15 & 16 Lateral Benefit from Trunk 685 F.F. $14.35/F.F. $9,830 Sanitary Sewer Proposed Lots 15 & 16 TOTAL $34;609 The City will determine the final amounts based on the assessment rate at the time of the final plat approval and final plat areas and dimensions. This development shall be responsible for all costs associated with this development. �7 YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH NOVEMBER 26, 1985 PAGE 5 CONDITIONS: 1) This development shall provide for 63.9 acre ft. of storage for pond GP -7 and the necessary easements for it. 2) Access on to Hwy 149 must be approved by Mn Dot and if approved, this- development shall construct a right turn lane off of Hwy 149 into this development. 3) This development shall dedicate adequate rights-of-way for Becker Road and Delaware Trail as referenced in the engineering report. 4) This development shall dedicate a 20' permanent utility easement for trunk storm sewer west of the existing sanitary sewer easement over proposed lot 15 along with a 10' utility easement across the northeasterly lot line of proposed lot 15. 5) This development shall dedicate a 30' temporary construction easement westerly of the permanent utility easement for the storm sewer. 6) This development shall be responsible for prepaying or entering into a waiver for trunk area storm sewer, lateral benefit from trunk watermain and trunk sanitary sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 7) All costs associated with this development shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 8) All applicable standard engineering conditions shall apply. 9) Submittal of landscape plan. 10) 10' x 18' parking stalls required. tZ K a 36CO ................. FIGURE 1 YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH ra.1LE,-E X66 EP -2 'DP -II ! 829.0 856.0 CENTER - 856.0 ! 864.4 -- ��� •:171.[ pR111L' PAB2S.- E�ICc�.24 a 4E E -b 876.3 877.2 _. 2" �/ / ii( IN95 �a! i IO_s_-/ 0. RD 'a EEC 42" - 1E -A e OP 848.0 � OP` roti , - V 858.3 ,tiESCO MJ HILLS `,N. 862.8 o"; I- -- - ,Z,O 9I, aCOi. II WESCOTT DR r.J CARRIAGE 12" % .I. -.LS I E-bA / _--`F GARDEN LJP.- 14 , •\ 873833.0 1 854.0/ j j -_LE7frNGTbN {{II 882.0 -. J874. P6Af$ I Q'a• J83-2 O 879.1 JP -59 _ �� ' 882.0 -J `- � �Q P= 61 -.. � 954.0 . -_ r�1P -45. 12 BB70 :v 894.0 t� T-42 879.7 1 887.1 TN'z JP-60 i2• 8881IJP-41 �:_; y r 881.2 '.892.3 8870 L.S.-15 893.512 8260.'. _7 JP -63 �900.7;ry�yir r FP=44-� L--- 890.7 895.7 =;:err "0 Q, J9 y SQUARE F 'v 885.3._._ • 8870 885.7 a JP -31 + 888.1., % 876.3 •NI: 880.4 - + P/- ^� JP -30 8730 879.4 z W 21 +J -n J P- 8950 R LLS I 15TraC-171! '• ==j ' I -820 O it A�)-S'.: 8 77.3 • 1 �sc�,:. -�-- .}+ - 886.0 \ J GP -5 �1 /�� �._a,NFR=E„•,�-L. 844.0 85513 i �.SQK LSI �i / l I 7---G P-6 it \\\ 866.0 GP -9 - 879.3 His- 5 6.0 L4 REv 1 '•-i�LACE 7 MI 871.0 TATIDIN"� :.r \ -7 C/) P-10 J88 64.0 I-� ` 871.71.0 \ ?.O y REV. oN. -- _ r - 1St Our JGP-4 . • ti� 883 \ LLl _1 Imo. { 1 JP -58`? 874.0 8877.5 822 <V 882.0 j �l J -G l JP -20 852.0 855.6 J -0 1t JP -21 L-&-17 8400 j r ! .............. ............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. SUBJECT PARCEL A's, City Of eagan ' - approved: standard PUBLIC STORM SEWER plate #: ;�- WORKS y - DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN JP -56 856``. ! 8P 2 P4 �� �� 885.4 864.4 . t� P23 1885;74 Z .............. ............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. SUBJECT PARCEL A's, City Of eagan ' - approved: standard PUBLIC STORM SEWER plate #: ;�- WORKS y - DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN .:iri ✓illi ..:iL�o'•�.� !PY •L�f Y/ K / 1 • Z W Z 8 Q : _ W • J e a A % JJi�i%i Jam' i 1I � ' Id + z =o ^n n� Z •ea N � a �� m T . j Q Ub >> �: a Z O O< W J ja lei r "- rI• ' ` 7 C7 9 a ` �� s•'' 4 t6` /' %�i� / 'off---�-----■ a i _ O j_ •� ,i �_� ! 1 O Y4 35 - . `Sw�! .' .3 . .5 .5•p S:S 'P:5i o � F5t'■Sf f� �-� � � � O (� 0� o r W e �z5 �ES�: 5•��':Es'' v \i% �• W •5 iri[ • iJ:• SSww cii�5': �CU p 5.. 87 J: ^€S: F5 3S•..:'� lV iA o S X23 , r7 L:SSA3 c- Z 5. : Rs.S: S..iS WSJ ::Rid: lu '^ c .W 4 e:55w 5 .r c 'si •�ti: ...azi: w+l�o 3, iy• �� .0 o N .SSc�SS Y M-1 I.S.. Qui :53• .'.` - :EC-�-:5�� :s S .�5.5 ' ` - l .r. t�' 35 �• �RS�, •_ ::. S5d3-5� 'A � Cl' a;;� _� ;:'Y45'. L WE S.SE.. 2:! .,5" i5: �Y 71 CS a ,n z ► �� } .-' a��8 ® / :1��; S89.44'W I ' 5 \ y-12.20 1 / � 3 \ 6 I 7 EAE TYP � •p EWA l,l ` s \\ \,ti\ � \ ♦ N �'\ \ 1 \\ N W L • Q62I �p l � I W •i i \ e \1 I \ H`W • 898 �w \ \ r \ k 1 pie• �.a. \\ \``\\ �, t `j�• \\'� 0 \goltomr PSH 1 I y I ' al I 0z �taaq\q• 12 4f, i I — ` — I r, Q ♦ \ \ ADE ' \ / e�? �S t \ \ \ 0\ \ \ \\ '> \\ I �" �, ' �I W I _ NOR; \ \\ o TRUNK AREA z� QF N •�, •i '`�— ,� s Iw k ti Sanitary Scale; I inch fl z I SCALE IN 1J. ►'MN Water14 of E.G. R U D E NI r!,f:a� 624.60 i / r II' I LAND SURVE -LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK I' a i 9560 Lnesa Circle Pines,, M Telephone 1 (612 O-kK ®`� Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-five FINAL RESOLUTIONS/YORKTON I & YORKTON II/IR FINANCING I.. Final Resolutions for Yorkton I & Yorkton II Industrial Revenue Bonds -- Final resolutions have been received and will be reviewed by the City staff and City Attorney's office for consideration of industrial revenue financing for both the Yorkton I and Yorkton I -I -projects. The City has not received a letter from bond counsel satisfying the City staff's concerns that bonds could become taxable due to the. procedure variance that was required for this application, due to the October 31 deadline. It is the City Administrator's recommendation that final resolutions not be approved for Yorkton I and Yorkton II unless a letter is produced from bond counsel and found to be satisfactory by the City Attorney regarding this issue. A letter has been requested on several occasions from the developer and assuming an opinion is given to the City, it will be distributed as part of the Administrative packet. Since all the final resolu- tions and bond documents have not been sent to the City, the City Attorney and City Administrator will reserve their right for comment until preparation of the Administrative packet and at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the final resolutions for Yorkton I and Yorkton II ($600,000 for each bond transaction) industrial revenue bonds. EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDN./PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT) J. Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition Preliminary Plat (Replat) of Eagandale Office Park Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 2 -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on Tuesday, November 26, 1985, to consider an application that was submitted for preliminary .plat (replat) approval in the Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addition. This plat combines the four_. existing lots into three new lots north of Corporate Center -Drive and west of Trapp Road. The Advisory Planning Commission- is recommending approval of the preliminary plat to the City Council. For additional informa- tion on this item, refer to the Engineer' g and Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages throughfor your review. Action that was taken by the Advisory Plann�ommission will be available as a part of the Administrative packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat (replat) for the Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addition. 73 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT) APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION LOCATION: L 2, 3, 4, BL 2, EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION, NEa OF SECTION 3 EXISTING ZONING: L-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 26, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 7, 1985 REPORTED BY: ENGINEERING AND PLANNING DEPTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for Preliminary Plat (Replat) approval in the Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addi- tion. This plat combines the 4 existing lots into 3 new lots north of Corporate Center Drive and west of Trapp Road. SITE PLANNING: The Sperry office building approved by the City Council in June 1985 is under full construction. This property just south of I-494 and surrounded by L-1 (Light Industrial) use is approximately 22.7 acres. The desired replatting will allow all of the parking for this building to be on the same Lot 1 parcel. A cul-de-sac, Trapp Court, will provide a secondary access to this lot. It will also have the capability to service replatted Lots 2 & 3. Lot sizes will be: Lot 1 ±10.4 ac, Lot 2 f4.4 acres, Lot 3 ±7.4 acres. Staff has requested that the applicant submit a detailed plan demonstrating the parking layout to ensure site compliance in terms of sizes and numbers. The utilities are in and all setbacks meet Code requirements. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The building contractor is performing the site grading over this property under Sperry's building permit. The grading plan is feasible and appears to be within City Code. The grading plan proposes boulder retaining walls at various locations along the southwesterly boundary of this site due to the existing valley located along the southwesterly boundary of this development. As long as the height of these rock retaining walls does not exceed 5', Staff does not have any problems with them. This development is located within major drainage district H as shown on Figure 1. Because the location of this site is near the down stream end of this major drainage district the existing trunk storm sewers should be able to handle the runoff from this site. WATERMAIN: The City has an existing 12" watermain along the south side of Corporate Center Dr and an 8" watermain within Trapp Rd to provide service to this proposed development. EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD NOVEMBER 26, 1985 PAGE 2 This development proposes to loop an 8" watermain from Trapp Rd through this development and connect to Corporate Center Dr. The developer proposes to install this public line privately. This is feasible as long as the developer constructs this watermain in accordance with City standards. SANITARY SEWER: The existing sanitary sewer that can provide service to this development is the Eagan North Interceptor. This -line runs down the southwest property line of this development. The MWCC owns and operates this existing 21" trunk sanitary sewer line. This development is proposing to tie its sanitary sewer service into this trunk line. To do this will require a permit from the MWCC. Any necessary fees or bonds required with the permit will be the responsibility of this development. This development cannot connect to the sewer line until the City is in receipt of a copy of the permit from the MWCC. STREETS: Corporate Center Dr and Trapp Rd are existing city streets bordering this proposed development. Corporate Center Dr and Trapp Rd are both 44' wide 9 ton urban streets. This development will not require any upgrading of these city streets. This development is proposing the cul-de-sac off of Trapp Rd to provide access to the easterly point of the Sperry property and better access to lots 2 & 3. Staff recommends constructing this cul-de-sac in accordance with City standards for a tear drop design with center island. The developer will have to make minor adjustments to the right-of-way dedication to suit the tear drop cul-de-sac. Staff is recommending this different type of cul-de-sac because it will help channelize the traffic. If left open, there would be a 90' paved area with no channelization providing many conflicts for vehicles attempting to reach Trapp Rd. This design forces traffic in a one-way movement around the cul-de-sac and will be much safer. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The City has adequate right-of-way for Corporate Center Dr and Trapp Rd. The proposed 60' right-of-way for Trapp Ct will be adequate provided the developer dedicates a 20' drainage and utility easement adjacent to the public right-of- way. - This is in line with previous right-of-way dedications in this area. The City will require this developer dedicate a 20' easement over the proposed water line from Trapp Rd through this property to Corporate Center Dr. The developer shall dedicate all other necessary easements in accordance with City Code. ASSESSMENTS: A review of the trunk area related assessments for utilities indicate that the City has levied all trunk area related assessments for this proposed development. EAGANDALE OFICE PARK 3RD NOVEMBER 26, 1985 PAGE 3 CONDITIONS: 1) The retaining wall and grading of the parking lot along the southwesterly boundary cannot encroach upon the City's storm sewer and sanitary sewer easement. 2) The watermain the developer proposes on constructing shall be built in accordance with City specifications and properly verified that the contractor adhered to City standards. 3) This development will be responsible for obtaining the necessary MWCC connection permits. 4) The cul-de-sac, Trapp Court, shall be constructed in accordance with City standards for a tear drop design and 9 ton standards. 5) This development shall dedicate a 20' utility and drainage easement adjacent to all publicly dedicated right-of-way. 6) This development shall dedicate the appropriate right-of-way necessary for the cul-de-sac to conform to City standards. 7) If approved, the Waiver of Plat shall be subject to all applicable ordinances. 74 'DOT I T ,o iLosr spuR PLOST SPUR ,, CWNTRY- iT No 3 AGFM .3 Ac:/-- g l+ sf jM ! . kI FIGURE # 1 EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS co DEPARTMENT SUBJECT PARCEL STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN P - approved: standard plate #: Agenda Information Memo December 3, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-six ADDITIONAL ITEMS A. Construction Fund Transfers --Director of Finance VanOverbeke is recommending the transfer of funds for the Municipal Center expansion •project. It is Gene's determination that all budgeted expenditures relative to the project have been made. Any additional expenditures would be processed through a general fund appropri- ation. (See the attachment on page_.) Also, a transfer of the 1983 Equipment Certificate showing a cash balance of $11,119.44 and the 1984 Equipment Certificate showing a cash balance of $152.10 would be transferred to the debt service fund for the 1983 Equipment Certificates to reduce subsequent debt service levies. This authorization and transfer should include any 1985 interest earnings which will be determined at. the year's end. Enclosed and referenced as pages We through &P enare fund summaries for the equipment certificates as recom- mended for the transfer. ACTION TO BE transfer of as recommended CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the funds for the Municipal Center expansion project by the Director of Finance. WT MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1985 SUBJECT: FUND TRANSFERS Please -find attached more specific information relative to the approval for the transfer of funds requested in my memo of November 21, 1985. The following information is included: 1. A project summary for the municipal center expansion project showing a budget versus actual comparison. The specific request is to transfer the balance of $5,506.23 back to the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund since it financed the estimated shortage of $190,000. I believe that all budgeted expenditures relative to the project have been made. Any additional expenditures will be processed through a general fund appropriation. 2. A 1983 Equipment Certificate (Fund #35) Summary showing a cash balance of $11,119.44. 3. A 1984 Equipment Certificate (Fund #36) Summary showing a cash balance of $152.10. The specific request is to transfer the total in 2 and 3 ($11,271.54) to the debt service fund for the 1983 Equipment Certificates to reduce subsequent debt service levies. In addition to the dollar amounts noted above, authorization to transfer should include any 1985 interest earnings which will be determined at year's end. Please let me know if you would like to discuss this or would like additional information. Finan e irector/City Clerk VanOverbeke EJV/kf Attachment FUND #35 SUMMARY 1983 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATE 10/31/85 Bond Proceeds $ 125,000.00 Interest 2,800.94 Expenditures: Fire - Air Systems $12,055.00 - Command Center Bus 3,475.00 Prot. Insp. - Pick up 8,880.00 Streets - Chev 1 -Ton 21,018.50 - Ford F-8000 45,307.00 - Plow & Sander 2,951.00 Parks - Groundsmaster 12,870.00 - Tree Spade 8,500.00 Mobile Radios 1,625.00 (116,681.50) ------------- BALANCE $11,119.44 U FOND #36 SUMMARY 1984 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATE Bond Proceeds Expenditures: Police - Chev Suburban Fire - Ford F-350 Prot. Insp. - Chev Pick up Engineering - Van Streets - Chev 1 -Ton - Ford L-8000 Parks - Ford F-250 - Chev 1 -Ton Radios Other 10/31/85 Irj $12,098.63 11,691.09 8,580.00 9,207.60 22,063.00 48,617.00 13,116.00 16,232.00 5,505.00 2,737.58 $150,000.00 149,847.90 $ 152.10 PROJECT SUMMARY MUNICIPAL CENTER EXPANSION PROJECT MUNICIPAL CENTER Building - Contract Architects Parking Lot/Storm Sewer Landscaping Carpet Telephone Furniture Screens Sign Bond Issue Costs Other Contingencies Subtotal Discount on Bonds Interest Earnings TOTAL OLD CITY HALL Building Sanitary Sewer Parking Lot/Storm Sewer TOTAL ENTIRE PROJECT TOTAL Transfer from Revenue Sharing OCTOBER 31, 1985 BUDGET $750,000 64,000 -0- -0- -0- -0- 40,000 -0- -0- 21,000 -0- 40,000 $915,000 -0- -0- $915,000 $ 50,000 -0- -0- $ 50,000 $965,000 -0- TOTAL EXPENDITURES $814,661.00 70,355.25 54,824.55 19,385.56 15,641.00 36,614.23 36,044.35 11,354.00 3,625.00 8,920.91 16,445.30 -0- $1,087,871.15 $12,324.11 (66,291.88) $1,033,903.38 $ 64,478.00 20,756.12 30,356.27 $ 115,590.39 $1,149,493.77 (190,000.00) GRAND TOTAL $965,000 $ 959,493.77 a VARIANCE FAVORABLE (UNFAVORABLE) $ (64,661.00) (6,355.25) (54,824.55) (19,385.56) (15,641.00) (36, 614.23 ) 3,955.65 (11,354.00) (3,625.00) 12,079-09 (16,445.30) 40,000.00 $(172,871.15) (12,324.11) 66,291.88 $(118,903.38) $ (14,478.00) (20,756.12) (30,356.27) $ (65,590.39) $(184,493.77) 190,000.00 $ 5,506.23 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1985 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE COACHMAN HIGHLANDS TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATION Enclosed is a letter addressed to the Mayor and City Council regarding traffic congestion on Yankee Doodle Road. The City Administrator has contacted Mr. Scott Helgeson and informed him that the Mayor and City Council would receive a copy of the letter and meanwhile the City staff would be addressing the issues with Dakota County and preparing a response for their review. This was satisf tory to Mr. Helgeson. A copy of the letter is enclosed on page. I,,I:i ti17-07`V D Enclosed is a copy of the October status reports for all the assisted housing programs in Dakota County and the Community Development Programs administered by th Dakota ounty HRA. A copy of this report is enclosed on pages 99through . EXPANSION OF DAKOTA COUNTY FACILITIES Enclosed is a copy of a letter that was sent by Commissioner Steve Loeding and a response and resolution prepared by the City Administrator regarding the future location of County facilities. The letter is enclosed on page (s) ?/ Q SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION PUD REVIEW MEETING Mayor Blomquist has been asked to attend and testify at an FAA hearing in Washington, D.C. on December 10 which conflicts with the date the Planning Commission and City Council were planning to review the Comp Guide as it relates to commercial and industrial and also the Blackhawk Park PUD. It was suggested by Mayor Blomquist and concurred by the Advisory Planning Commission that this meeting be rescheduled from December 10 until December 12. If another date is more desirable, there should be discussion on December 3 with a different day selected. AIRCRAFT NOISE STUDY Enclosed on page 10-7,, is a copy of an article from the Minneapolis Labor Review regarding the FAA aircraft noise study. Councilmember Wachter has asked that this article be shared with the rest of the Council. The FAA hearing mentioned in the article is the hearing that Mayor Blomquist has been invited to attend. 1` City Administrat r '� Mayor Bea Bloomquist And the Eagan City Council City of Eagan Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Dear Bea, Scott A.Helgeson 3251 Evergreen Drive Eagan, Minn. 55121 November 20, I write this letter out of concern as both a homeowner and as a board member on the Coachman Highlands Townhome Associat.ion. As you are well aware, Eagan has many localized traffic problems. With luck, most of these high traffic areas (such as Pilot Knob Road) will be mitigated due to the completion of I 35 E. Are you aware, though, of the severe traffic problems on Yankee Doodle Road, especially during rush hours? I wonder if it will take a serious, perhaps fatal, accident to occur before action is taken by the City of Eagan to reduce the congestion and speed vehicles on that road. As the Board of Director understand from previous City bulletins, Yankee Doodle Road is scheduled for a major upgrade this coming Spring from a two lane road to a four lane road. We also understand that there is no plans for intersection control lights at Yankee Doodle and Coachman Road. If I am correct in this, I would like to emphasis the fact that land adjacent to Coachman Road is being heavily developed. By next summer there will be a enormous increase in intersection traffic on Coachman and Yankee Doodle. Please consider a semaphore installation for that intersection. In the meantime, please seriously consider ways to reduce the congestion and speed of traffic on Yankee Doodle. Is it really necessary that Yankee Doodle be posted at a 50 mile per hour speed limit. Since traffic can only go between Hwy 13 and Pilot Knob Road (1 mile) why is it that important to have such a high speed limit? Is it too much to ask that this speed limit be reduce to 35 miles per hour to reflect the residential character of this area? We think not. Finally, Coachman road itself is not posted and never patrolled for excess speeds. It is quite common to see cars traveling down Coachman at speeds in excess of 50 miles per hour. This is definitely a residential area; please let's not wait until a child is killed before action is taken to regard this road as truly residential. Please respond to this letter in writing or call me at home (452-5206) or at work (456-4737). Your time and consideration in this matter is appreciated by all at Coachman Highland Townhome Association. Sincerely , / f '? -1Q7 Scott A.�"elgeson O Vice Preside t 1.00--0 F .AM nq..� . . / / •..s.i �.Q�ys. " A Brief description of assisted housing programs: 1. Section 8 Existing: Eligible low and moderate income households pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for uti- lities) for rent in market rate rental units. The Dakota County HRA (or South St. Paul HRA) pays the rest. The rental units must pass federal inspection standards and the rent plus an allowance for utilities paid by the renter, must not exceed established Fair Market Rent limits. 2. Moderate Rehab: The Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation program offers owners of ,rental property assistance for making building repairs which will bring their properties into compliance with Housing Quality Standards. The owner, in turn, agrees to rent to households eligible for Section 8 Rent Assistance. The rental of these units is coordinated through the Dakota County HRA and the rent payments for the tenants is the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available. 3. Section 8 New Construction: The developers of these units receive a subsidy for construction of these units. The owners in turn, are required to rent these units to eligible low and moderate income households. The rental payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. These rental deve- lopments are owned by private developers. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available except for Section 202 projects for senior citizens. 4. Low Rent Housinq: The Dakota County HRA (or South St. Paul HRA) owns and manages the housing units offered through the Low Rent Housing Program. These housing units are rented to eligible low and moderate income house- holds who pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for utilities) for rent. 5. 235 Home Ownership: This program offered assistance to eligible low and moderate households for purchasing a home. The program is no longer available. 6. 236 Rental: The developers of these units receive a subsidy for construc- tion of these units. The owners, in turn, are required to rent these units to eligible low and moderate income households. The rental payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available. 1 � F ' fU 0 ?- t m7 x to ' ! b 1 :3 ;i; 1 ►-" 7 r 9 •-+ 1 — -`1 "f 1 C7 .J r ➢/. [ l t -,_A x t V"'1 'iT 1 :T 'a 1 .1 d C 1 U 1 t? 1 ('1 :f i-1 I i D' f Z r =:3, v 3] 1 t= •3 f V7 [ '• C'1 t -M 1 Y H 1 f•1 f a 7_ b 11 t / T 1 •C 1 Z a 1 (rl 1 < 1 m 1 L7 -i -3 It 1 Q 1 I; a 7 1 :,-• r) Z 1 S 1 d + O 1 O 1 < i .L 1 '-+ Z I L3 Y i••7 •! O !D -A 1 Yry R ''+i l (7 f -{ - --4 t D 1 .-+ 1 1 J i :� 1 ! L i -S If i ■ ! N a f ^••� 1 t a @ •[ 1 1 � 1 1 D -1 :f 33. � 1 1-- l r- 47 I Cl Ll f 1 •. .. f' f -:- 1 in f C3 I C7 1 t- t 3C N n ti- It s t 1 1 it d 'w tl • L :j- t, 11 iG 1 ,N- 9 C 1 f j 1 1 C3 as S w 9 1 i � i t0 IF 1 ,q a•e ! 1 1 f f -,1 I K" 1 t It 1 f 1 t .1 i Y 1 .tl j • � R It / a Q IF 1 y a •Y t 1 +- t 1 a I a rn UJD• �� Y IF 1 •+ .+�� 1 ++� U 1 fal 1 B II i'r? t f9 1 W 1 f:AIt I �f IT" N •� R It IF .x-. {-F 1 [ !t :1 1 f ILEO 1 '. rl 1 DJ i 11 1 ! a t •+ 1 V I 1 ID• . r + 1 L11 1 _ 7 c-+ 7 1 3 SA tol 1 @ N 1-- r 1 g a �+ 1 It9 1 • •� ! V 1 �-- Oti , -.! 1 .7 ..,3 a i 1 ii i i a i r 1 <¢ 41 r 1 I 1 / 1 O� 1 I 3 — 1 Y s 1 0 y{ 1 ICA 'CA +1 .■ A A 'L'� ( 1 "3 FLA L`Y I 1 ➢ 1 •9 1. (1 W 1 t @ t UI 3 1 A 1 O t tw t i t n v+ •.1.1 '.b r 'W r •t iz 4 9 I -a DI (D — 7 7 1 1 11 f 1 t 1 1 • t [ n S 1 1 If 4 O w �• Y -*r.1 •9+ - p1 +t9 / @ !: @ 1 O /9 I '9 1 b I O i A 6l ➢ 9 1 (p 1 N ! I Y 1 • 7! It 1 1 1 2 f I f f D� CI 1 'E I1 1 i 1 s '9 6i +Q 1 r 19 @ 1 a B i.a 1 N ➢ 9 1 A� •S i f 47 _ A N a 1 ! 1 ] 1f 1 i 1 I 1 O { F'• 11 ISl 7 u^.1 1 .so 'I t9 1 @ ' 19 I B 1 t9 i 45b 1 V B !y a @ i .•y 1 m3 a It a i � 1 1 11 1 1 • 1 1 S*f 00 1 ry a r i 1 t R t 1 a 1 ►— i ; V 11 +® a +�, 1 •J �� $ ; vWl a r 8 _' E. t 9q l d C3T-11 P!i 1 Z Tl X 1 1 R M 1 1 + 1 S t! 1 1 1 • 1 ! 1 f 1 :{ '�I [rf =1 1 t I ➢F3� D --1 � �1 f � 1 45b f' 'S1 7 @ 1 '® . •1 .A 1 C.i N x m 1 19 1 t9 1 d 1 Q 61 t Y.J 1 V a a 1 {- n� J• O f 1 • tU11 '1 1: 7 1 i 1 1 ii t 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 , r 1 1 -4 O - s [ a i '' 9 7 Z it '1 a 1 1 T t r+ .' 1 t 1 ! TJ • a 1 �+ 1 z V 9 N '6Y' ; SY ,j 1 V i (V _ O ! ISO A a t9 1 - u7 �1 Ln ti► t 0 a_f•1 i 1 >=• � 1 1! 1i • 1 1 J 1 t [ 'Q:• 9 n @ Q9 'ta, .1 1 •SY tl f i1 t 9 •Si @ t B f @ r N 1 Ff � � 9 1 `sl � •9 I d .T' Rte+ ■ t r It tl H N t t t 1 � 1 f 1 1 I i i 7 1 y I 3 2 1T ; .,3 a9 1 13 m 1 d ' T / I.N 1 •6i f•i layi .. .r.Y + -� fD 4 7 d t i � i 1 1 1 I j t C U3 ---11 1 • '1 ➢ 1 t 1 c:F. C+ t IFa d19 R n 6► • a R5 v 1.-A 1 a5^ '9 I '3 9 d 9 1 9C7,t 1 t U 1 !? 1 f, } i s � [ 1 r I 1 ; t l a t � L•o O 1 i [ r K tl @ t1 4 6l 1 S 1: N / :41 9 .! B 1 @ 1 fU t I 9 i A r • j bR [ ■ 4 • f .1 1 / f 1 1 0 It 1 N q Irai 1 n >ti 1 IF 711 tl A 1 j , •1 1 1 • 9 1 1 1 �• 1 m t -f b' W @ 1 •9: 4 •9 f y r 6 �+ t9 I Iv i @ ■ IRV 1 Si r f9 { .ti 1 9 7 9. a :K- D •- I^N iA { R IF1 1 1 (•. 1 t 1 1 i 1 1 { 1 1 r t"' Z [ M l f n f 1 11 f f i i 1 t 1 t ,1 e o n R �■ / N LJ A 1 I '-•' . ! t 1 -• T1 @ ; •.•� ; N U I 1 CO , .9 fU r 1 '11;11 t w t V , ro 1 ti r Ifl I w r Ct V ^- r a cs o tr_ -c : •� [ n 1 to I + V IF 1 C'• 1 ;5 7 �- 1 ! r CII 1 r^•1 , • 1 f1J I,'t9 1 P ; W .•+ I tq 1 ap Y C.3 1 1 rJ f1 :,47 11 1 ! 1 1 ! I tl j i 1 M ■ 1 '1 1 t 1 1 R� •-1 ' •w+ p i t -ti 1 �� 1 � ! i 3 a 1 !.a 1 +-• i :.I i .A V �-•- ➢ 3, f7 1 U V 11 e e N 4�i a.a 1 •g 'U r L• 1 .--. W I 1 Cn " T 1 7.11 1 9 1 1 W / t9 1 ;,n ry I ry r :il+ 1 I, L� ./ • L Brief description of Community Development Programs: 1. Weatherization: Through a joint effort of the Dakota County HRA and Economic Assistance, low-income homeowners and rental units occupied by low- income tenants are being weatherized to reduce the consumption of precious fuels, promote energy conservation, and reduce the burden of high heating costs on low-income county residents who can least afford rapidly rising utility bills.. 2. MHFA Home Improvement Loans: The Dakota County HRA administers this State program as a Title I lender. Loans are made to eligible homeowners (adjusted gross income less than $24,000 annually) for code compliance items and certain general improvements. An interest rate of 3% to 11.5% is charged depending on the applicant's income. 3. MHFA Home Rehab Loan: These loans are made to eligible low-income homeowners adjusted gross income under $7,000 annually) for rehabilitation items that directly affect the health, safety, energy conservation and accessibility of the home. The interest rate is 3% and deferred loans are available to households with adjusted gross incomes under $6,000 annually. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 4. MHFA Home Energy Loan: These loans are made to eligible homeowners for energy items. The interest rate is 8% for homeowners with adjusted gross incomes of less than $24,000 annually and an interest rate 9% for those with adjusted gross incomes of more than $24,000 annually. This program is admi- nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 5. Rental Rehab: Rental Rehabilitation loans are available to owners of rental units. There are no income or asset limitations. The loan amount cannot exceed $15,000 per one dwelling unit and for structures with more than one unit the loan limit is $7,500 per unit with a maximum of $37,500. The interest rate on the loan is 11%. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 6. CDBG Rehab Loan: Various housing rehabilitation programs have been done using Community Development Block Grant funds. They have assisted low and moderate income homeowners in making repairs to their homes with low interest loans and grants (grants are no longer available). This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 7. MHFA Solar Bank: Deferred loans are given to eligible low and moderate income homeowners for energy items. The eligible homeowners are referred from Northern States Power Company and Minnegasco. This program is admi- nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 8. 312 Loans: These loans are given to eligible owners of residential struc- tures at an interest rate of 3%. The loan funds must be used to bring the property into compliance with local codes, rehabilitation standards and some types of general improvements. Commercial and mixed use (commercial and residential) properties may apply for loans with an interest rate of 9%. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA in HUD approved target areas. 96 �/';'.C+i9paA'x.S�1:9�Ltb•[• . k . •�..y ,; ..:�: -rir�:N�4�'k+.±g:1c�t,'"a4,7ci.#�''"P'��A•3' ns.7�".�w�;s �-=�-+•�••s O�.�4➢ Al drl= V !! !! 1 1 I 1 / 1 1� 1 1 I ! ! 1 1 ! 1 I 1 ■1� ' 1� I�■rislciclol� ! { I lxl� 11 Im 1.21011y 1.�■ OI MIIp� Irlt 1 1 1x11 t!• 1' lST�1I�nI� r+ I t+ iani' _ ! li 0 1 ON ��] � Z l app l a l 11 1 �•�+ I���— aPp I m I B 1 9 1 •+ [ 0 1 r 1 9! U I r 1 Oa 1 �t1 I B Oa I m! A I fJ 1 1# 1 •� I N I W O mM V 1 B 11 I J I # 1 m I r! 1 a0 1 4 1 1 ! 11 1 Da 1 I W I m 1 tT 1 P 1 t0 !I g[ g l r 1 @ I N I@ 1 •� I m! 1— I U a0 t 1 A a J• � 1 '3 ••-� • N I r[ 1 ro I ! 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 �` 1 I 1 I to I 1 O•••• W 1 I 1 I U I 11 1 I I 1 1 •O I I G I t V1 I I 1 N --tp-- 1 0 1 W 1@; v• P 1 O! B; 4j1 I N I la 1# 1 B I V 1� 1 G I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 { 1 1 1 ! I I 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1� 1 ! 1 I I 1 1 I• { ! DS ro 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 m I m I r l 1 r 1 1 r m[ Ifa 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 t M 1 [ 1 w I W I 1 ! !' ! ! 1 !! I I 1 1 1 •+ 1 I N 11 Y i 1 t 1 •+ E B I m l m• P 1 ••� a g l= 1 g l N I m I B l ro 1 g I N I g 1 V; 6J1 1 r! B; { u! I C Y+ 1 G 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 It a 1 I r! I W I 1 I f A { ! HD V I V l m I g; g 1 V I N! B r I B 1 W 1 N! g 1 N 1 J 1 N 1 •-� 1 ftp i pf 1 t+ 1 B 'i ■# t 2 — --- — 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 — 1 — 1 — � — ! i ' — ' - ! — 1 ^ ' — 1 — � — 1 — • — YI � — ! m z G I r l 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i N I • 1 1 ■ 1 r— a0 I 1 I 1 ! ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O. I P I t9 I m l m 1 B I B I O E m I e l e I }9 I B I r I N! B I A I �+ 1 •� �+ !@ u bj I B! m 1' I 1 1 1 1 1 { 1 1 1 t a 1 1 1 _ i • !r! r J I U I m I g l@ 1 g I B t B I B I m I N 1@ 1 @ I N l cn [ -- 1 •••` 1 r 1 •+ I r f u ,I a, ! g[ -- 1 1 1 • I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 • I W 1 WA t 1 1 1 I� 1 1 I 1/ 1 � I W 1 1 \ a f •-I a 1 t 1 ■---- 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ! MRS m I U l g t g l m l B! g I m l@; m l r I m l m l m 1 0! m 1 •+ I N 1 •+ ; m! g ii g M B 1 tf ^t P I m I m I B I m! B I •+ t Isa 1@ 1 8 1 0 1 B I m I m m g I N •-� I r t m @ �I g! .-. � m � I--IBI@7g1tT1..l...E@1@l.telglBl...lPlmlNlNlNlmeg:l •#• { • 1 i [ 1 1 1! 1 / 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / I` ! ■ 130 I tf l m 1 0 1@ 1 PIN 1 •+ ;@; m f P I m! m 1 �-- ! P I B I U! aA I A l g l @ i1 �! u! D 2 1 1 1t 1 1 1 f1 1' 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 � B; -- A — 1 1 1 I I 1 t 1 1 1 I ! 9 O ------ r ; 1 ! 1 f 1 If 1 (A m ! ! C] —= 1 1 I 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 • n Y I r e 1 1 1 t [ t 1 1 ! 1 II 1 I rcl m I U I 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •— V 1 •T 1@ m•@ 1 .+ g m B I @ I N I r B # 1 •+ • R 1 W I L 9! g l .+ ! B t O V • 1 1 •: ! 1 1 1 1 ! ■ r I / 1 1 I r! 1 t D I t 1 t i 1 f 1 � 1 t 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 , 1 11— i 1 # is�g�mi@lwlBlmim�ml•-Iplal�flml.•-�m�rofNlg:d�lwlB! � 1 40 1 I 1 1 ■ 1 1 ! 1 1 I l r! 1 1 •� t 1 � 11 I G _ —10 --- u I m I g• g l �- I r a m 1@ I g a A I +-_ m l O Y W N m 1@ 1# 9 g I I }, ; B I 1 l 1 1 1 f 1 1 ! 1 - I f-"■ g I g 1 g g•@ I B I@! m l@; m f g ! B g I g I m f •� 1 9 1@� g I m 1@ 1j g II B I OD ! t 1 1 t 1 1 1 I t• 1 1 1 i li R I Pr g I g l m I m 1 g t m l m l@• m m! m! g I m g l m @ m m! g I g 1 g l p f m 1 x 1 1 t 1 1 1 [ I 1 1 l 1 1 t t 1 Y I. 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 t 1 I I 1 1 i I II 1 i 1 3z m f ro g 1@• m 1@ I g I m I m I B! g B I@ I d I N! g 1# I m a@ 1 0! 8 II g Y m l S _---- �—�— �---- — 1 1 I 1 i 1 1 I — 1 i i 1 II ■ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 ! f ! tl 1 m IDD L i r ! ! ! ! ! I 1 II 1 lel ! •ii 10 t •� t m I g a g• B I m 1 m l@ 1 @ I B 1@• p I g I g 1 g 1 •-� 1 m 1 m 1 b I p l l g II m I IP I _—~#— ; W I g t g i g! r! m; B; 9; m E m 1 •� I B; g; g 1 9; W ; g! m i •�• 1 g II •Bug E sN � 1 ! ! 1 1 11 � • I 1 1 1 ; 1 � GO g I g l m 1@ i g 1 B 1 B d i g 1 R! g 1 B[ m 1 ti• R 1 g t B 1 t9 1 A? 1 •m I g 11 /D :I g! _ _ •_ 1 t f 1 1 11 Y �[LD I 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 t c i Bt q!g � ,-{ g �'m!@• g�@ i •-wm1•n.i +9 i�.naugn v 1 ! i 0 ! m!@! B 1 B 1 •+ I m I m� m! y!@ N f 9 .®/ g d[ d 1 •. g l •a• f Tal 11 t� 11 g 1 a 1 a 1 1 1 a r i i I {(t 1 I November 8, 1985 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: Thank you for the time we had at your Mayors and Administrators meeting this morning to discuss the critical issue of the future location of county facilities. I am impressed with your strength of feeling that we must make our best effort to act now at this crucial time in our County's history. Because the time factor is critical, I am following up immediately with information to support your efforts in discussing the issues and gathering the support of your city leaders. We discussed the following action at the meeting this morning: A. I am enclosing the relevant legal statutes from our County Attorney, dated August 29, 1985. B. I am also enclosing a map giving the geographical centers, building locations and population centers. C. Each city offered to adopt a resolution in support of centralizing facilities and calling on their County legislative delegation to take action to provide the County with a more reasonable method of making decisions in locating facilities and providing the most effective services at the most efficient cost. D. Cities offered to contact legislators to impress upon them the importance of the issue and the fact that they must act now before we lock ourselves into what could be a $35 million mistake in the long run. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER STEVEN G DAKOTA COUNTY COMMISSIONER - FOURTH DISTRICT 1 7TH ST. 3260 W. 147TH ST. DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ROSE TUNELEP MN 55068 TELEPHONE 1560 HWY. 55 - HASTINGS, MINNESOTA 55033 PHONE 437-0430 HOME (612) 423-4150 November 8, 1985 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: Thank you for the time we had at your Mayors and Administrators meeting this morning to discuss the critical issue of the future location of county facilities. I am impressed with your strength of feeling that we must make our best effort to act now at this crucial time in our County's history. Because the time factor is critical, I am following up immediately with information to support your efforts in discussing the issues and gathering the support of your city leaders. We discussed the following action at the meeting this morning: A. I am enclosing the relevant legal statutes from our County Attorney, dated August 29, 1985. B. I am also enclosing a map giving the geographical centers, building locations and population centers. C. Each city offered to adopt a resolution in support of centralizing facilities and calling on their County legislative delegation to take action to provide the County with a more reasonable method of making decisions in locating facilities and providing the most effective services at the most efficient cost. D. Cities offered to contact legislators to impress upon them the importance of the issue and the fact that they must act now before we lock ourselves into what could be a $35 million mistake in the long run. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Y November 8, 1985 Page 2 E. County Commissioners are available to work with you to lobby your legislative delegation (if necessary and if requested) and to attend your meeting to speak on behalf of a resolution and to enlist the active support of your city officials. Again, thank you for the time and your support. If we can provide more information or can be of help in your efforts in any way, please call on me or your County Commissioner. Time is our major enemy - we must act fast and vigorously. Warmest regards, Steve Loeding, Commissioner 4th District SGL:dod enclosures 93 DAKOTA COUNTY MINNESOTA 9�4 M E M O R A N D U M DAKOTA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE CIVIL DIVISION Dakota County Government Center Hastings, Minnesota 55033 DATE: August 29, 1985 TO: Dakota County Board of Commissioners FROM: Robert F. Carolan, Dakota County Attorney SUBJECT: Relevant Statutes Relating to Location of County Seat and County and Judicial Office Facilities 1Y1 Our File No. C-85-491 I. County Seat A. Minn. Stat. Ch. 372 provides the following procedure for relocating the county seat: 1. A change in location of the county seat must be initiated by a petition signed by a number of legal voters equal to not less than 60 percent of those voting at the last preceding general election presented to the county auditor. Minn. Stat. §372.01 2. County Board must determine validity of signatures on petition. Minn. Stat. §377.03 3. If petition is valid, auditor must set date for special election not less than 20 days nor more than 30 days after receiving certification of validity of the petition from the county board, Minn. Stat. §372.04, and must publish two -weeks notice of the election. Minn. Stat. 372.05 4. A 55% majority vote in the special election is required in order to change the location of the county seat. Minn. Stat. §372.08 5. If the referendum passes, county seat must be changed within 60 to 90 days of election. Minn. Stat. §372.08 6. Elections to change the county seat may not be held for a period of five years after the last preceeding election for that purpose. -Minn., Stat. §372.09 .w 9� 9 Page 2 Memo to Dakota County August 29, 1985 II. Court Facilities Board of Commissioners The following statutes concern location of court facilities in Dakota County: 1. Minn. Stat. §373.05: "Each county shall provide at the county seat and keep in good repair, a suitable courthouse, supplied with fireproof vault's and other necessary. buildings." 2. Minn. Stat. §375.18 Subd. 3: "Each county is empowered to erect, furnish, and maintain a suitable courthouse. No indebtedness shall be created for a courthouse in excess of 1 2/3. mills on each dollar of assessed valuation without the approval of a majority of the voters of the county voting on the question of issuing the obligation at an election." 3. Minn. Stat. §2.722, Subd. 1, 1: Provides for maintenance of - a permanent District Court chambers in Hastings. 4. Minn. Stat. §480.22: _The Minnesota Supreme Court designates locations of chambers for judges of all courts. This is the only method of changing the permanent designations found in Minn. Stat. §2.722. 5. Minn. Stat. §375.14: This Statute provides in part that: "The County Board shall provide offices at the county seat for . . . judge of probate court, clerk of the district court . . . " 6. Minn. Stat. §487.21 Subd. 1: "The [County] court by rule designates the locations within the county court district at which regular sessions of the court shall be held provided, however, that regular sessions of the court shall be held in at least the county seat of each county within the county court district." County Jail The following statutes concern location of jail facilities in Dakota County: 1. Minn. Stat. §373.05: "Each county shall provide at the county seat _and keep in good repair . . . a suitable and sufficient jail and other necessary buildings. 0 i Page 3 Memo to Dakota County Board of Commissioners August 29, 1985 2. Minn. Stat. §641.01: "The county board of each county is authorized to construct, purchase, or lease, regulate, and maintain, at the expense of the county, a jail for the safe keeping of prisoners, and also, adjoining and connected to it, a residence for the use of the sheriff." 3. Leasing Minn. Stat. §641.24 allows the county board to enter into a lease agreement with a city, or county housing and redevelopment authority whereby the city or HRA would construct a jail in accordance with the County's plans, as approved by the commissioner of correction, and the county would lease back the jail site and improvements. There is no requirement in this statute that the leased jail be located in the county seat. However, Minn. Stat. §373.05 would require a jail at the county seat in addition to such a leased facility. 4. County Regional Jails a. Minn. Stat. §641.261 et seq. sets forth the ,requirements of funding sources and authority to join with other counties in establishing regional jails. IV. Other County Offices The following statutes concern location of offices for other county officials: 1. Minn. Stat. §382.04: "Every county auditor, treasurer, county recorder, clerk of district court, sheriff, judge of probate court and court commissioner shall keep their offices at the county seat. In any county where general terms of district court are established and 'held at a place other than the county seat, the court commissioner may have his/her office at such other place." 97. Page 4 Memo to Dakota County Board of Commissioners August 29, 1985 2. Minn. Stat. §375.14: "The county board shall provide offices at the county seat for the auditor, treasurer, county recorder, sheriff, judge of probate, clerk of the district court, and an office for the county engineer at a site to be determined by the county board " 3. Minn. Stat. 5373.05: "tach county shall provide at the county seat, and keep in good repair . . . other necessary buildings." GJ/vaa Jim 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 November 18, 1985 MR FRED JOY, DAK CTY ADMIN DAK CTY GOVT CTR 1560 HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 Re: Centralization of Countv Facilities Dear Mr. Joy: i7 P BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Recently, Commissioner Steve Loeding attended a Mayor/Manager Break- fast in West St. Paul and discussed the future location of County- wide facilities. Apparently, Dakota County is considering several public facilities that could total up to $35 million and obviously, the location of these public facilities is of great importance to the County's constituency. The City of Eagan is experiencing rapid growth which appears to be typical of northern Dakota County. In order to consider centraliza- tion of County facilities to the constituency, both geographical and population centers should be strongly considered when future public facilities are funded and constructed within our County. In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council, at a special meeting that was held on Tuesday, November 12, 1985, a resolution was enacted that strongly encourages the Dakota County Board of Commissioners to acquire land and construct future County facilities in locations that consider 1) a central geographic location, taking into consideration interstate and County highway accessibility, and 2) the present and future population center. A copy of that resolution is enclosed for your review. The in that was sent to the City by Commissioner Loeding has been very helpful and on behalf of the Eagan City Council, we are very appreciative of our County commissioners taking the time to share their long-range, public -facility planning objectives with our communities. �17 THE LONE OAK TREE. .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY LETTER TO DAKOTA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR NOVEMBER 14, 1985 PAGE TWO If I can be of any assistance or provide some future County Board meeting on the significance County facilities, I would be more than happy to tance. Sincerely, F\V� Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc: Chairman & County Commissioner Russ Streefland County Commission John Voss County Commissioner Joseph Harris County Commissioner Gerald Hollenkamp County Commissioner Steve Loeding Mayor Will Branning, Apple Valley Mayor Connie Morrison, Burnsville Mayor Patrick Akin, Farmington Mayor Duane Zaun, Lakeville Mayor Lu Stoffel, Hastings Mayor William Saed, Inver Grove Heights Mayor Robert Lockwood, Mendota Heights Mayor Leland Knutson, Rosemount Mayor Ken Kube, W. St. Paul TLH/kf Enclosure 1" discussion at a of centralizing provide my assis- CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION CENTRALIZATION OF COUNTY FACILITIES WHEREAS, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners is proposing a major capital improvements program to fund the construc- tion and location of certain public buildings within Dakota County; and, WHEREAS, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners has determined these public facilities are needed for the purpose of serving residents throughout Dakota County; and, WHEREAS, geographic location in population centers are an important consideration when public facilities are planned providing for the delivery of County services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan strongly encourages the Dakota County Board of Commissioners to acquire land and construct future County facilities in locations that consider 1) a central geographic location taking into consider- ation Interstate and County highway accessibility, and 2) the present and future population center. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: '_r!y -. Its; Mayo . Motion made by: Wachter Seconded by: Egan Those in favor: All Those against: Dated: November 12, 1985 CERTIFICATION 111� 1111711 2AVII!,1111111! 11 11 It�J Clerk ,r '�'+i I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a special meeting thereof assembled this 12th day of November, 1 85. nnD-aju_ 4noverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan �1twr� v�iS t.16cc QC4", J 11 -22 -QS Sabo announces aircraft noise study and quieter ILS system Congressman Martin Olav Sabo (D -MN) today an- nounced that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will begin studying ways to accelerate the mod- ernization of airline fleets in order to reduce airport noise. The agency will also give the Minneapolis -St. Paul Airport new landing equipment that will allow planes to fly at higher altitudes over South Minneapolis and Richfield. Earlier this year, Sabo, who is the ranking majority member of the House panel that funds the FAA, inserted language in legislation directing the FAA to conduct a six-month study of possible incentives to .get airlines to modernize their fleets with quieter planes. The FAA will hold a public hearing in Washington to begin the study on December 10. Sabo said he intends to appear at the hearing, along with Twin Cities officials. Representatives of the House and Senate yesterday began to reconcile differing versions of the transporta- tion spending bills passed earlier by the two bodies. Al- though the conferees have not completed action on the measure, they agreed to a provision Sabo offered that directs the FAA to install a precision Instrument Land- ing System (ILS) for a runway at the Twin Cities airport. Current landing procedures require aircraft to descend to low altitudes over residential neighborhoods in South Minneapolis and Richfield. The million -dollar ILS will allow planes to fly at. higher altitudes, thus reducing noise. It will also reduce the length of time that airport operations are at their peak and enhance overall airport safety. L -Ji E-1