The URL can be used to link to this page

04/16/1996 - City Council RegularAGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING April 16,1996 6:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (10 MINUTE TOTAL TIME LIMIT) IV. DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) V. CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) p A. PERSONNEL ITEMS B. CHANGE ORDERS, Municipal Center Building Project .F C. APPROVE CONTRACT, Municipal Code Corporation for City Code Republication and Ordinance Codification Sr D. DECLARE SURPLUS PROPERTY, Set Date for City Auction jr E. MASSAGE THERAPIST LICENSE for Lisa Heyerman to Practice at Wastl Chiropractic Clinic, 1340 Duckwood Drive F. FINAL SUBDIVISION, Kresse Addition Located on Skyline Road & Skyline Drive Q G. RENAME, Burnsville/Eagan Telecommunications Commission ■,p H. EXTENSION FINAL SUBDIVISION, Good Value Homes Inc., Deerwood Townhomes 2nd / Addition Located on the North Side of Deerwood, East of I -35E APPROVE RESOLUTION Restricting On -Street Parking, Project 695 (Yankee Doodle Rd - Lexington Ave. to Federal Dr.) ADA J. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1, Contract 95-15 (Well #19) K. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1, Contract 95-16 (Well #18) I 'IDL. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1, Contract 96-02 (Well #18 - Site Improvements) VI. ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS (GOLDENROD) A00A.DECLARE VACANCY AND APPOINT REPLACEMENT, Airport Relations Commission Ill B. APPOINTMENT, Solid Waste Abatement Commission Hauler Representative VIZ. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) . PROJECT 687, Biscayne Ave. (Streets & Utilities) . PROJECT 615R,_Meadowview Rd. (Streets & Utilities) FINAL ASSESSMENT, Project 643R, Oslund Timberline (Street Reconstruction) D. FINAL ASSESSMENT, Project 664, Wescott Square (Street Reconstruction) rII!TIOLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) P 112 A. AMENDMENT, City Code Section 6.37 Regarding the Maximum Number of Residential Refuse Hauling Licenses 16B. 6 B. FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, Lot 2, Block 1, Rahncliff 4th Addition (Green Mill) Located on Rahncliff, Next to Holiday Inn Express 1;1 TC. AMENDMENT, City Code Section 3.2,- Subd. 8 (Permitting Water Hydrant Usage) IX. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) ' 0A. REZONING,• City of Eagan, 5.3 Acres from PD (Planned Development) to I-1 (Limited Industrial), Lots 1 & 2, Imre Addition, Except Part in the Highway A Located on the West Side of Highway 149, in the SE 1/4 of Section 2 1F� 1 B. PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, Derrick Investment No. 91, Located in the Southwest Corner of Lone Oak & Pilot Knob Road, in the NE 1/4 of Section 9 X. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE (BUFF) XI. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) XII. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XIII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 12, 1996 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR APRIL 16, 1996 CITY COUNCIL MEETING After approval is given to the April 16, 1996 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration. The regular meeting minutes for the April 2, 1996 City Council meeting and the minutes for the April 2, 1996 Special City Council meeting will be included with the Administrative Agenda on Monday. AID;3I7SINES. There is no Department Head Business to come before the Council at this time. Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 Eagan City Council Meeting The following items referred to as consent items require one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brief. A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Park Maintenance Workers -- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Brian Banaszewski and David Downs as seasonal park maintenance workers. B. CHANGE ORDERS. MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING PROJECT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve change orders in the amount of $1,816.08 for the Municipal Center Expansion as presented. FACTS: • Staff is in the process of working with the Construction Manager to finalize this project and close out of the contracts. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff memorandum on page C —city of eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: APRIL 5, 1996 SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CENTER EXPANSION CHANGE ORDERS MEMO The City is in receipt of five change orders for the municipal center remodeling in the net amount of $1,816.08. The changes are described below: 1. Peterson Electric - Change Order #10/pco #107 - Patch existing walls for additional electrical installations - $1,168.00. 2. Peterson Electric - Change Order #9/pco #101 - Delete fire alarm connection to magnetic door lock, delete extra pump connection and modify light fixtures to fit revised ceiling opening - $220.25. 3. Glewwe Doors - Change Order #6/pco #99 - Backcharges for caulking and repainting necessary due to door installation and exchange one hollow metal door for wood - ($335.93). 4. McGuire Mechanical - Change Order #8/pco #54 - Relocate existing lines for new boiler flue and backcharge for regrading after plumbing connections - $33.76. 5. McGuire Mechanical - Change Order #7/pco #51 - Install drain spout extension and backcharge for site clean up - $730.00. These changes have been reviewed in detail by the consultants and staff. If any Council member wishes additional information, please let me know. W Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 Eagan City Council Meeting C. APPROVE CONTRACT, MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION FOR CITY CODE REPUBLICATION AND ORDINANCE CODIFICATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the republication and ordinance codification contract with Municipal Code Corporation. FACTS: • In June of 1995, as part of the Finance Department's work plan, the City Council reviewed republication of the City Code. • Staff subsequently issued a request for proposals to provide this service and responses were received from five potential providers. After a thorough review of the proposals, telephone and in-person interviews were conducted with the two finalists, Sterling Codifiers, Inc. and Municipal Code Corporation. While neither of the finalists could provide the required service to the City, Municipal Code Corporation is less expensive and therefore, is being recommended by staff. • The ordinance codification component of this contract, which will bring the Code current by including ordinances approved since July 1994, has been completed annually by Municipal Ordinance Codifiers of MN (last done in June of 1994). Although they responded to the RFP, this firm was not given consideration for the new project because they do not provide search and retrieval software for an electronic code. • The objectives of the republication component of the contract are as follows: - A change to an 8'/2 X 11 page format printed on both front and back. - An editorial review/report on areas of concern in the Code with suggested changes for improvement. - A more comprehensive index and table of contents to make the Code more user-friendly. - A better historical index of Code changes. • The republication component includes an optional analyzation which will point out conflicts, inconsistencies and obsolete provisions in conjunction with current state statutes, as well as conflicts within the Code itself. Staff is recommending that this optional project be undertaken at this time also. 3 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 Eagan City Council Meeting • The objectives of making the Code computer accessible are as follows: - Provide better accessibility for users through computers and the network. - Reduce the number of paper copies. - Provide a better basis as a working document for making changes. - Position the Code for future internet access for better customer service. • Staff is also recommending that Municipal Code Corporation be designated as the total Code Administrator which means they will maintain an inventory of Codes and Supplements for sale to the public. They will handle the complete marketing and subscription service. The City would receive a 10% commission on sales after an agreed upon sales price is set. This is an opportunity to privatize a service that the City has no fundamental need to be involved in and which can be handled better by Municipal Code Corporation. • The only other Code project of this magnitude was the original codification effective January 1, 1983. • The proposed time schedule is as follows: a) Submission of editorial and analyzation report 4 months b) Review of report by City 1 month c) Submission of proofs to City 3 months d) Review of proofs by City 1 month e) Delivery of completed Codes 2 months Total 11 months (Any City caused delays will lengthen the schedule.) • The estimated cost is as follows: a) Republication with analyzation, first codification and related items $11,650 b) Electronic Code 1.015 Total I l 2,665 This will require both the 1995 and 1996 Finance Department appropriations for codification, along with a small reallocation of 1996 Finance Department line -items which can be accommodated. • The proposed contract is available for review by any City Councilmember, if desired. • Both staff and the City Council share a concern that a change in the form of government could cause certain sections of the newly republished Code to be outdated quite soon. Research with other cities regarding change of form of government has not identified this situation as a problem; consequently, the recommendation to proceed as described is being presented for action. i` Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 Eagan City Council Meeting D. DECLARE SURPLUS PROPERTY, SET DATE FOR CITY AUCTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To declare unclaimed property and miscellaneous City property to be surplus and to set the annual City auction on Saturday, May 18, 1996 at 10:00 a.m. at the Eagan Maintenance Facility at 3501 Coachman Point. FACTS: The City holds an annual auction to dispose of unclaimed stolen property and miscellaneous City property which has been reviewed by staff and is no longer needed by the City. Pending Council approval, this year's auction will be on Saturday morning, May 18, at the City Maintenance Facility. E. MASSAGE THERAPIST LICENSE FOR LISA HEYERMAN TO PRACTICE AT WASTL CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC 1340 DUCKWOOD DRIVE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a massage therapist license for Lisa Heyerman to practice at Wastl Chiropractic Clinic. FACTS: The City is in receipt of an application from Ms. Heyerman for a license to practice therapeutic massage at the Wastl Clinic at Town Centre. The application has been reviewed by staff and the Police Department and no reasons have been identified for denial at this time. • In response to the Council discussion at the April 2 meeting, staff will prepare a comprehensive list of licenses which may be handled on an administrative basis. The analysis will be provided to the City Council for its consideration in the future. ATTACHMENTS: • Application form enclosed without page number. so, Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 Eagan City Council Meeting F. FINAL -SUBDIVISION - KRE SE ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a Final Subdivision for the Kresse Addition located on Skyline Road adn Skyline Drive. FACTS: so Final plans, development contracts, and financial guarantees are in order. ISSUES: None ATTACHMENTS: Final plat map - page. i m m In co T N � O01 ON QI JN JT Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 Eagan City Council Meeting G. RENAME, BURNSVILLE/EAGAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize the renaming of the Joint Cable Commission to the Burnsville/Eagan Telecommunications Commission. FACTS: • At their joint meeting with the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission, both Cities' Councils indicated a desire to change the name of the Commission to the Burnsville/Eagan Telecommunications Commission to reflect the changing role of the group and to contemplate the need for the Cities to form policy with respect to emerging telecommunications issues. The purpose of this action is to authorize the Commission to be renamed and to provide staff direction to modify the joint powers agreement as necessary to reflect the Commission's role. Any modifications to legal documents will be returned to the Councils for separate action at a later date. UJOIr Agenda Information Memo April 16,1996 Eagan City Council Meeting H. EXTENSION FOR RECORDING FINAL SUBDMSION - DEERW005 TOWN—HOMES 2ND ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny a 90 -day extension for recording the Deerwood Townhomes 2nd Addition plat located north of Deerwood Drive and east of I -35E. FACTS: On February 6, 1996, the City Council approved the final plat for Deerwood Townhomes 2nd Addition consisting of two portions of property that were previously MnDOT right-of- way. Good Value Homes submitted the plat for review at Dakota County, but they are unable to proceed with the review until the applicant furnishes additional updated title work which is tied to a Quiet Title Action. At the time of Council approval, Good Value Homes Inc. was operating under the assumption that the Quiet Title Action necessary to plat the second addition was at, or near, completion. Due to some legal issues, this was not the case. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: (2) April 1, 1996 letter from Passe Engineering representing Good Value Homes, page Final Plat Exhibit, page 91 APR -01-19% 1129 1 612 755 6240 1 612 755 1362 P.02 r PO&W � �• , 9445 East Isar Road. 5utte 208 - WwWapok W WAM - (612) 755-6W FAX (61 Z) 7b5-1962 R-99% City of Eagan April lot, 1996 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, M., 55122-1897 Re:Deerwood 2nd. Addition plat~ for Good value Homes Inc. APR Attn: Mike Ridley Dear Mike; On behalf of our client Good Value Homes Inc., I am requesting a 90 day extension for the above referenced plat because of delays by the court system in finalizing the Quiet Title Action. The plat is in for review at Dakota County but they are unable to proceed with the review until we furnish updated title work, which is tied into the Quiet Title Action. We understand that we will be beyond the April 6th. expiration date for approval but we are caught up in this snails pace legal process and would appreciate any consideration the city mould give us for this extension request. sincerely .. _ /U 1 612 755 1362 TOTFL P.02 04-01-96 12:21PM P002 #08 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 L YANKEE DOODLE ROAD PARKING RESTRICTION ACTION FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: To approve a Resolution restricting onstreet parking for Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) from Lexington Avenue to Federal Drive, Pilot Knob Road from Duckwood Drive to FEghsite Drive and Denmark Avenue from Tamarac Pointe to Yankee Doodle Road. FACTS: City Project 695 provides for the capacity expansion improvements of Yankee Doodle Road, Pilot Knob Road and Denmark Avenue which are designated on the State Aid street system. While the design provides for the addition of travel lanes in each direction, safety/emergency vehicle shoulders, and turn lanes, it does not provide for onstreet parking. As such, in order to receive State Aid funding to finance this project, it is necessary for the Council to formally pass a Resolution prohibiting onstreet parking through the limits of this project. ATTACHI%UNTS: • Resolution, page '" fit r 1 r r••iiNt• WNOW- . +......,•nr+ ...i, . t•, PLAT s, +1.73. ..neo. u• r 1 \ • - G —1 ,• r � � I' \ a .•. I � Q -------- --:Gar V � � � S 7 L -T-1 �►� K ' r �J S \ • - G —1 ,• r � � I' \ a .•. I � Q sow r V � � � S 7 L sow r CITY OF EAGAN A RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS On Roadway From To Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) Lexington Avenue Federal Drive Pilot Knob Road (CSAH 31) Duckwood Drive Highsite Drive Denmark Avenue Tamarac Pointe Yankee Doodle Road THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 16th day of April, 1996, by the City of Eagan in Dakota County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) from Lexington Avenue to Federal Drive, Pilot Knob Road from Duckwood Drive to Highsite Drive and Denmark Avenue from Tamarac Pointe to Yankee Doodle Road; and WHEREAS, the "City" will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvement of this street; and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the "City" shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) from Lexington Avenue to Federal Drive, Pilot Knob Road (CSAR 31) from Duckwood Drive to Highsite Drive and Denmark Avenue from Tamarac Pointe to Yankee Doodle Road at all times. DATED this 16th day of April, 1996. Thomas A. Egan, Mayor ATTEST: E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk State of Minnesota County of Dakota City of Eagan I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a Resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Eagan at a duly authorized meeting thereof held in the City of Eagan, Minnesota, on the 16th day of April, 1996, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk RESOLUl NOMM.YDR/CB 1.3 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 J. CONTRACT 95-15, WELL NO 19 ACTION FOR COUNCE, CONSIDERATION: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 95-15 (Well #19) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: Contract 95-15 was awarded by Council action on December 5, 1995, which provided for the drilling and development of Well No. 19 in the southwest corner of Thomas Lake Elementary School. The contract documents stipulated a completion date of March 15, 1996. Due to the City's inability to issue a Permit To Proceed until the DNR's Water Appropriate Permit was issued, the contractor was delayed from beginning construction until February 5, 1996. Subsequently, it would be appropriate to approve a Change Order extending the contractual completion date to May 11, 1996. There is no change in the contract costs associated with this Change Order. /4/ Agenda Information Memo April 16,1996 K. CONTRACT 95-16 WELL NO 18 ACTION FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: To approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract 95-16 (Well No. 18) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • On December 19, 1995, the City Council awarded Contract 95-16 for the drilling and development of Well No. 19 located east of the Cliff Road Water Treatment Facility. • Based upon delays of the DNR to issue the Water Appropriation Permit, the contractor was not allowed to begin construction within the timeframe anticipated by the contractual completion date. Subsequently, it is appropriate to extend the completion date from June 1, 1996 (substantial completion) and July 1, 1996.(faW completion) to June 22, 1996, and July 22, 1996, respectively. In addition, there was a seven-day delay while the City investigated a potential groundwater contamination through sampling and testing which subsequently proved negative. • There is no increased cost associated with this Change Order. /S Agenda Information Memo April 16,1996 L. CONTRACT 96-02, WELL NO 18 ACTION FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 96-02 (Well No. 18 - Site Improvements) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: Contract 96-02 provided for the construction of raw water transmission mains and other miscellaneous site improvements to facilitate the addition of Well No. 18 to the City's water system. Based on changes to the City's Comprehensive Water Supply & Distribution Plan, it was determined economically feasible to modify the contract to convert the existing 16" watermain for the Cliff Road Reservoir into the raw water transmission main in lieu of constructing a new 10" parallel raw water transmission main. This design modification results in a cost savings and a deduct of $10,594.50 to the original contract amount. There is no necessary change in the completion date associated with this Change Order. 16 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 Eagan City Council Meeting A. DECLARE VACANCY AND APPOINT REPLACEMENT AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To declare a vacancy on the Airport Relations Commission and appoint the current altemate,-Ted Gladhill, to fill that position and to appoint an individual to fill the remainder of the alternate tern. FACTS: • Commission member Pat Todd has contacted staff and indicated that her new job will prevent her from continuing to actively participate in Commission activities. Ms. Todd has been unable to attend the last three Commission meetings and staff has requested a letter from her relative to her plans. Ms. Todd's term expires in January of 1997. Mr. Gladhill currently serves as the Commission alternate and it would be appropriate to consider him to complete Ms. Todd's term. Edward Hannasch of 3711 Greensboro Drive and Max Ramsey of 849 Great Oaks Trail had expressed interest in the Commission during Organizational Business in January. Staff has contacted both individuals and they are interested in appointment for the remainder of the alternate position. If the Council wishes to make a selection at Tuesday's meeting, they can pull this item and identify either Mr. Hannasch or Mr. Ramsey for the alternate position or direct staff to request applications for this position. B. APPOINTMENT, SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT COMMISSION HAULER REPRESENTATIVE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To appoint a representative to fill a hauler position vacancy on the Solid Waste Abatement Commission. FACTS: • The Council previously declared a vacancy for one of the hauler positions on the Solid Waste Abatement Commission. Staff contacted other licensed haulers and has received three applications to be considered for appointment. All applicants are active in refuse and recycling activities in the City of Eagan. Mr. Moening of BFI and Mr. Elliott of Quality Waste Control have also been participants in the Commission's discussion regarding the hauling system over the past year. ATTACHMENTS: Application letters on pages through 1 . Waste Systems BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES of MINNESOTA Action Disposal Systems — St. Paul District April 2, 1996 Ms. Joanna Foote Recycling/Communications Coordinator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Dear Ms. Foote: This letter serves as my application for the vacancy on the Eagan Solid Waste Abatement Commission as a hauler representative. I have been in the Solid Waste business since 1973. The 23 years in the business have been as an employee of Browning-Ferris Industries (BFI). I have held various positions from accounting to Regional Controller to Regional Operations Manager to Division Marketing Manager. Presently I am the District Manager of the Inver Grove Heights District that service Dakota, Ramsey and Washington Counties. Since June 1994, I have been a monthly attendee of the monthly Solid Waste Commission meetings. I am married and have two grown children and live in Bloomington. I ask that you consider me as the hauler representative. Sincerely, Ronald F. Moening District Manager 4325 E. 66TH ST. • INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, MN. 55076 9 612-455-8634 9 FAX 612-455-0257 1I'i. in - 41 I' I I M I "DEDICATED TO BUILDING A QUALITY FUTURE" April 5th, 1996 Ms. Jenna Foo(e, Rec-,,^.ling/Commun;catiln� ��nord;nator City of Eagan Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 Dear Joanna: This letter is in reference to yours of March 28. 1995 regarding the opening on the Eagan Solid Waste Abatement Commission. I am interested in applying for this vacancy. In the past 1 have sat in on many of your meetings and have enjoyed the feeling that something was getting accomplished. The Past several meeting I have not attented due to a conflict of time. This has bean resolved. Thank you for your consideration. Even if 1 am not appointed I will still be attending some of the meetings. Sincerely, 4&ze-;el Bob Elliott Company Representative /17 1901 West 144th Street • Bumsville, MN 55337 • 435-3454 - +I'!r P,adanreWded paWW,myrft. FAX 435-9764 Recycle. & part of dw sohaiomf A A 0%- A " ff% AAGARD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Joanna Foote Recycling and Communications Coordinator City of Eagan, Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 April 3, 1996 I am responding to your notice regarding the vacancy existing on the Eagan Solid Waste Abatement Commission. Please consider this letter as a formal request for consideration of appointing an Aagard Sanitation, Inc. representative to the panel. As Operations Manager for Aagard Sanitation, Inc. located in Eagan, I feel compelling reasons for involvement on the Commission. First, I understand the business of hauling for profit both trash and recycling. Second, Aagard is licensed for both residential and commercial hauling in the City of Eagan. Third, trash and recycling issues that impact the city affect Aagard as a business and as an Eagan resident. Please direct any correspondence to my attention, and I look forward to meeting you soon. Sincerely, 411 Anders J. Stone m 3291 Terminal Drive • St. Paul, MN 55121 • 612.686.2371 • Fax 612.686.2373 Agenda Information Memo April 16,1996 MLIIfC IM&=Gs A. PROJECT 687 BISCAYNE AVE ACTION FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 687 (Biscayne Avenue - Streets & Utilities) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. FACTS: On March 19, the City Council received a feasibility report for the above -referenced project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on April 16. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. On March 5, an informational neighborhood meeting was held to present this project to affected/mterested property owners. The minutes from that meeting are enclosed. ISSUES: • The project being presented at this public hearing has been reduced in scope based on concerns expressed by affected property owners, preproject appraisals and several City Council Workshop sessions. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility report, pages through -q-40— . • Informational meeting minutes, pages through. C2 / city of Qagan Report for Biscayne Avenue (Halley's First Addition) Street and Utility Improvements City Project No. 687 Eagan, Minnesota March 1996 File No. 49566 4" Sonestroo ® Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers a Archit*cts St. Paul, Minnesota Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects March 13,1996 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. Is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. Robert W. Rosene, P.E.* Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. Richard E. Turner, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.F. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. Robert G. Schunicht. P.E. Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A.' • Senior Consultant Re: Biscayne Avenue (Halley's 1 st Addition) Street and Utility Improvements Project No. 687 Our File No. 49566 Dear Mayor and Council: Howard A. Sanford, P.E. Keith A. Gordon., P.E. Robert R. Pfefferle. P.E. Richard W. Foster, PE. David O. Loskota. P.E. Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Thomas R. Anderson. A.I.A. James R. Rosenmerkel, P.E. Donald C. Burgardt, P.E. Thomas A. Syfko. P.E. Frederic J. Stenborg, P.E. Ismael Martinez, P.E. Michael P. Rau. P.E. Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. James R. Maland, P.E. Jerry D. Pertzsch. P.E. Scott J. Arganek. P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson. P.E. Mark R. Rolfs, P.E. Mark A. Seip, P.E. Gary W. Morien. P.E. Paul J. Gannon, A.I.A. Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E. A. Rick Schmidt, P.E. Dale A. Grove, P.E. Philip J. Caswell, P.E. Mark D. Wallis, P.E. Miles B. Jensen, P.E. L. Phillip Gravel, P.E. Karen L. Wiemeri. P.E. Gary D. Kristofitz, P.E. Brian K. Gage. P.E. F. Todd Foster, P.E. Keith R. Yapp, P.E. Douglas J. Benoit. P.E Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E Cecilio Olivier, P.E. Kent J. Wagner, F.E. Paul G. Heuer. P.E. John P. Gorder, P.E Dan D. Boyum, P.E. Jeffrey J. Ehleringe•, P.E. Joseph R. Rhein, P.E. Lee M. Mann, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Lee M. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson Agnes M. Ring James F. Engelhrrdt Attached is our Report for Biscayne Avenue (Halley's 1st Addition) Street and Utility Improvements. The proposed improvements are presented and discussed within the report along with detailed cost estimates and a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the City Council and other interested parties to discuss this report at a mutually convenient time. Yours very truly, BONESOO, ROSE ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark Hanson a3 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional En 'neer under the laws of the Suam of Min eso Mark A. Hanson Date: March 13, 1996 Reg. No. 14260 2335 West Highway 36 v St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 612-636-4600 REPORT FOR BISCAYNE AVENUE (HALLEY'S 1ST ADDITION) STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Project No. 687 TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Page Number LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1 DISCUSSION 2 Sanitary Sewer 2 Water Main 2 Services 2 Storm Sewer 2 Streets 3 EASEMENTS / PERMITS 4 COST ESTIMATE 4 AREA TO BE INCLUDED 5 ASSESSMENTS 5 REVENUE 7 PROJECT SCHEDULE 8 APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL FIGURES 1-7 SCOPE This project provides for street and utility improvements to serve Halley's I st Addition, which is located north of Gun Club Road on Biscayne Avenue east of T.H. 3, as shown on Figure No. 1. Halley's 1st Addition includes 9 existing lots zoned industrial and is served by Biscayne Avenue, which is an existing gravel street. The project is proposed at this time to properly serve the existing industrial development in accordance with Eagan development standards for industrial zoning. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with Eagan's Comprehensive Plans for utility and streets serving this area. The project, as outlined herein, can best be carried out as one contract. In September the City of Eagan contracted with a real estate appraiser to prepare a preliminary property value benefit (appraisal) analysis for three representative lots in Halley 1st Addition based on the proposed improvements for this project. Listed below are the results of the preliminary appraisal analysis based on value of benefit to each lot for each improvement compared to the estimated assessment based on project costs for this project (Project No. 687). As noted, the estimated assessment to Lot 1 Block 1 exceeds the estimated benefit by 10.7% ($2,385), while Lots 3 and 4 Block 2 exceed the estimated benefit by 15.7% ($4,135). as 49566h MLV,pd I Lot 1 Block 1 Lot 3 Block 2 Lot 4 Block 2 Improvement Benefit Assm't. Benefit Assm't. Benefit Assm't. Sanitary Sewer/Service $ 3,998 $ 4,147 $ 5,070 $ 5,069 $ 5,070 $ 5,069 Water Main/Service 3,998 5,204 5,070 6,007 5,070 6,007 Storm Sewer 5,237 5,733 6,658 7,269 6,658 7,269 Street Curb 8,917 9,451 9,400 11,988 9,400 11,988 Total $22,150 1 $24,535 $26,198 $30,333 $26,198 $30,333 As noted, the estimated assessment to Lot 1 Block 1 exceeds the estimated benefit by 10.7% ($2,385), while Lots 3 and 4 Block 2 exceed the estimated benefit by 15.7% ($4,135). as 49566h MLV,pd I DISCUSSION Sanitarw Sewer Sanitary sewer proposed herein is shown on Figure No. 2 located at the back of this report. An 8" diameter sanitary sewer is proposed in Biscayne Avenue to Gun Club Road. The 8" sanitary sewer will connect to the existing 8" sanitary sewer in the northerly portion of Biscayne Avenue recently constructed as part of T.H. 3/School Road (Red Pine Lane), City Project No. 673 -Revised. The undeveloped industrial zoned property located west of Halley's 1st Addition will be served by the existing 10" sanitary stubbed from Red Pine Lane near the easterly right-of-way of C.P. Rail. It's assumed this sanitary sewer will be extended to the south, as shown on Figure No. 2, when the lower undeveloped land along the north and east sides of Pond LP -23 develop. Water Main Water main proposed herein is shown on Figure No. 4 located at the back of this report. A 12" diameter lateral water main is proposed in Biscayne Avenue to Gun Club Road. The proposed water main is in the high pressure zone and will experience residual and static pressures of 45 psi and 74 psi respectively. Services Sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed to the existing right-of-way line for Biscayne Avenue to serve each.of the industrial lots in Halley's 1st Addition. Due to the industrial zoning, 6" diameter sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed to serve each lot. Storm Sewer Storm sewer proposed herein is lateral and is shown on Figure No. 6 located at the back of this report. The storm sewer improvements in Halley's 1st Addition can be constructed based on two alignments which both include a 27" diameter storm sewer pipe and catch basins in the low point of Biscayne Avenue. Alignment A provides for constructing a 27" diameter storm sewer in Biscayne Avenue south to Gun Club Road and west to Pond LP -23. Alignment B provides for constructing a 27" diameter storm sewer west from Biscayne Avenue along the common lot line between Lots 2 and 3 Block 1 to their west line (east line Parcel 021-79). The drainage improvements across Parcel 021-79 include grading an overland Swale to Pond LP -23A and Pond LP -23. It's assumed the overland swale will be upgraded in the future when Parcel 021-79 develops. It should be noted water quality requirements are not satisfied based on Alignment A. However, some water quality improvements can be satisfied based on Alignment B. 4"661 MLv/pd c262 Pond LP -23 does have an existing storm sewer outlet to Pond LP -22 in Dakota County Park (Lebanon Hills Regional Park). The existing storm sewer outlet includes a 12" CMP culvert under C.P. Rail and T.H. 3 and an 18" CMP culvert under Dodd Road at Farm Road. The culverts are interconnected by existing drainage ditches and the wetland located south of Farm Road between T.H. 3 and Dodd Road. The discharge of storm water from new development into Lebanon Hills Regional Park (Pond LP -22) has not been reviewed with Dakota County Parks. It's recommended the elevation of the existing culverts and drainage ditches be determined and the impact of storm water flows be reviewed with Dakota. County Parks when this area develops further. Streets Street improvements proposed herein are shown on Figure No. 7. Street improvements provide for upgrading Biscayne Avenue to a 36' wide bituminous street (9 ton design) with concrete curb and gutter. The proposed section, which is the same section in Red Pine Lane, is noted below: 11/2" bituminous wear 2" bituminous binder 2" bituminous base 10" Class S aggregate base Boulevard and driveway improvements include seeding all boulevards in the street right-of-way and constructing bituminous driveway approaches to each lot. The location and number of driveways to each lot, including width, will be reviewed during plan preparation. The cost for driveway approaches is based on one driveway approach to each lot (28' wide). Street improvements are not proposed in Gun Club Road. Street lights are not proposed at this time. However, it is recommended street light requirements be reviewed with each property owner and Dakota Electric. 49566VeMLwo 3 EASEMENTS / PERMITS Easements are required for storm sewer/drainage improvements across Parcel 010-80 for Alignment A and Parcel 021-79 for Alignment B. For purposes of this report it's assumed the easement from Parcel 010-80 can be acquired at no cost, since it's minimal. The easement from Parcel 021-79 is estimated at 0.2 acre. The estimated cost is $2,000 based on $10,000/acre. It's assumed Lots 2 and 3 Block 1 Halley's 1st Addition will grant the required permanent easement for storm sewer for Alignment B at no cost. Permits are required from MPCA, M1:ID, and MCES. The City of Eagan will have to review improvements adjacent to Pond LP -23A for compliance with the Wetland Conservation Act. COST ESTIMATE A preliminary cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at the back of this report and is summarized below: The total estimated project cost is $240,570, which includes contingencies and indirect costs based on Alignment A for storm sewer. The total estimated project cost based on Alignment B is $223,790. Contingencies are estimated at 5%, while indirect costs (including legal, engineering, admiriistration and bond interest) are estimated at 35%. 49S661eepott.wpa C� 4 Storm Sewer Storm Sewer AliLmment A Alignment B Sanitary Sewer $ 33,090 $ 33,090 Water Main 38,270 38,270 Services 23,300 23,300 Lateral Storm Sewer 55,080 36,300 Street 90,830 90,830 Easements - 2.000 Total $240,570 $223,790 The total estimated project cost is $240,570, which includes contingencies and indirect costs based on Alignment A for storm sewer. The total estimated project cost based on Alignment B is $223,790. Contingencies are estimated at 5%, while indirect costs (including legal, engineering, admiriistration and bond interest) are estimated at 35%. 49S661eepott.wpa C� 4 AREA TO BE INCLUDED Section 36 SE'/4 Parcel 010-80 - Alignment A - Storm Sewer Parcel 021-79 - Alignment B - Storm Sewer Halley's I st Addition Lots 1-4 Block 1 Lots 1-4 Block 2 ASSESSMENTS Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property in accordance with the City of Eagan's Assessment Policy for utility and street construction. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. Estimated assessments associated with lateral utility and street costs will be revised based on final project costs. Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer proposed herein is lateral and is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis (Figure 3) dividing the project cost ($33,090) by the assessable footage (1182 F.F.). Trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer are pending to Halley's 1st Addition as part of Project 673 -Revised. Therefore, trunk area assessments -for sanitary sewer are not proposed to be assessed as part of this project. Water Main Water main proposed herein is trunk. Therefore, it's proposed to assess the benefitted industrial lots based on an 8" diameter equivalent water main. The trunk oversize cost (12" versus 8") is estimated at $9,500 and is summarized below: Pipe (6201f x $10/!f x 1.05 x 1.35) $8,800 Valve (1 ea x $500/ea x 1.05 x 1.35) 700 Total Oversize $99500 From: Gayleacuter eonestroo Engineering Fax: (612) 636.1311 Voice: (612) 6044811 To: Mike Foertsch Pape 2 of 2 Friday, April 12,1986 ):19:31 A& The lateral assessment rate per. front foot is determined by dividing the lateral equivalent project cost ($28,770) ($38,270 - 9500 = $28,770) by the assessable footage (1182 FF). Trurik area assessments for water main are pending as part of Project 673 -Revised. Therefore, trunk area assessment for water main are not proposed to be assessed as part of this project. Services Services are proposed to be assessed based on their cost to the benefitting property they serve. Storm Sewer Storm seer proposed herein is lateral and is proposed to be assessed on an area basis dividing the project cost by the total estimated square footage (290,772 sq. ft.). The project cost for assessment purposes is based on the higher cost to construct the storm sewer south in Biscayne Avenue to Pond LP -23 (Alignment A= $55,080) versus overland through Parcel 021-79 (Alignment B = $38.300, which includes $2,000 for easement acquisition). Listed below is the estimated rate per square foot for each alignment. Rate/Sq. Ft, Alignment A (South in Biscayne Avenue to Pond LP -23) $0.19 Alignment B (Open channel through Parcel 021-79) $0.13 As stated, existing culverts and drainage ditches provide the outlet for Pond LP -23. Therefore, because trunk storm sewer improvements are not proposed to be constructed as part of this project, it is not proposed to assess trunk area storm sewer at this time. In the event trunk storm sewer improvements are constructed in the future, trunk area storm sewer assessments will be assessed. Street Biscayne Avenue serving the industrial property is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis (Figure 7), dividing the project cost ($90,830) by the assessable footage (1182 F.F.). 49566treport.wpd 6 ila.3 0 I.I A summary of project costs and revenues based on assessing final project costs is as listed below: Project Cost Revenue DAIance Sanitary Sewer Lateral $33,090 Lateral Assessment33090 Subtotal $33,090 $33,090 -0- Water Main Trunk Oversize $ 9,500 Lateral 28,770 55 0 Lateral Assessment (industrial) $55,080 $28.770 Subtotal $38,270 $28,770 -$9,500 Services $90,830 Lateral $23,300 $90,830 Lateral Assessment $90,830 _1213Q0 Subtotal $23,300 $23,300 -0- Storm Sewer (Alignment A) Lateral $55,080 Lateral Assessment 55 0 Subtotal $55,080 $55,080 -0- Street Lateral $90,830 Lateral Assessment $90,830 Subtotal $90,830 $90,830 -0- Total Balance 49,500 The anticipated project deficit is $9,500, based on assessing the final project costs, which will be the responsibility of the Trunk Water Main Fund. 3 J 4.wN A summary of project costs and revenues based on assessing the preliminary appraisal amounts is listed below: Project Cost _ evenu Balance Sanitary Sewer / Service Lateral $38,710 Benefit3$ 8,416 Subtotal $38,710 $38,416 -$ 294 Water Main / Service Trunk Oversize $ 9,500 Lateral 46,450 Benefit $38,416 Subtotal $55,950 $38,416 -$17,534 Storm Sewer Lateral $55,080 Benefit 50,422 Subtotal $55,080 $50,422 -$4,658 Street Lateral $90,830 Benefit7$ 4.234 Subtotal $90,830 $74,234 -$16,596 Total Balance -$39,082 The anticipated project deficit is $39,082, based on assessing the preliminary appraisal amount. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report March 19, 1996 Public Hearing April 16, 1996 Approve Plans/Specifications June 1996 Award Contract July 1996 Substantial Construction Completion (excluding final bituminous surface) October 1996 Assessment Hearing Summer 1997 1st Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May 1998 �2 4"66VepwLv/pd APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE BISCAYNE AVENUE (HALLEY'S 1ST ADDITION) STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Project No. 687 Al Sanitary Sewer 620 LF 8" PVC sanitary sewer @ $28.00/lf 2 EA Std. 4' diameter MH w/cstg @ $1,400 ea 14 LF MH depth greater than 8' deep @ $90/lf 8 EA 8" x 6" wye @ $90 ea 1 EA Connect to existing sewer @ $1,000 ea 100 LF Improved pipe foundation @ $2/lf 100 IF Subtotal + 5% Contingency Subtotal + 35% Indirect Cost Total Sanitary Sewer B} Water Main 620 LF 12" DIP water main @ $30/lf 25 LF 6" DIP water main @ $16/lf 1 EA 12" butterfly valve @ $1,100 ea 3 EA Hydrants @ $1,400 ea 2,000 LB Fittings @ $1/lb 1 EA Connect to existing water main @ $500 ea 100 IF Improved pipe foundation @ $2/lf Subtotal + 5% Contingency Subtotal + 35% Indirect Cost Total Water Main 33 495"WM v/pa 9 $17,360 2,800 1,260 720 1,000 200 $23,340 1.170 $24,510 8.580 $33,090 $18,600 400 1,100 4,200 2,000 500 200 $27,000 1,350 $28,350 9.920 $38,270 Service 264 IF 6" PVC sewer service @ $15/lf $ 3,960 264 LF 6" DIP water service @ $20/lf 5,280 8 EA 6" gate valve & box @ $400 ea 3,200 8 EA 12" x 6" tee @ $500 ea 4,000 2 EA Subtotal $16,440 I EA + 5% Contingency 820 15 CY Subtotal $17,260 0.5 AC + 35% Indirect Cost 6,040 4 EA Total Service $23,300 D1 Lateral Storm Sewer al Alignment A - South in Biscayne Avenue to Pond LP -23 750 LF 27" RCP storm sewer @ $37.20/lf $27,900 1 EA Std CBMH w/cstg @ $1,500 ea 1,500 3 EA Std CB w/cstg @ $1,100 ea 3,300 2 EA Std MH w/cstg @ $1,500 ea 3,000 I EA 27" RCP apron @ $900 ea 900 15 CY Riprap @ $60/cy 900 0.5 AC Seed w/mulch @ $1,500/ac 750 4 EA Storm inlet protection @ $100 ea 400 100 LF Silt fence @ $2/lf 200 Subtotal $38,850 + 5% Contingency 1,950 Subtotal $40,800 + 35% Indirect Cost 14.280 Total Lateral Storm Sewer - Alignment A - South $55,080 in Biscayne Avenue to Pond LP -23 - 3y 4"66VepMvq)d b) Aliernment B - Oven Channel Throusih Parcel 021-79 $15,000 300 LF 27" RCP storm sewer @ $36/lf $10,800 1 EA Std. CBMH w/cstg @ $1,500 ea 1,500 3 EA CB w/cstg @ $1,100 ea 3,300 1 EA 27" RCP apron @ $900 ea 900 20 CY Riprap @ $60/cy 1,200 700 CY Channel/pond excavation @ $8/cy 5,600 1.0 AC Seed w/mulch @ $1,500/ac 1,500 4 EA Storm inlet protection @ $100 ea 400 200 IF Silt fence @ $2/lf 400 200 CY Subtotal $25,600 + 5% Contingency 1,280 Subtotal $26,880 + 35% Indirect Cost 9.420 Total Lateral Storm Sewer - Alignment B - Open $36,300 Channel Through Parcel 021-79 $90,830 E Street 2,500 CY Common excavation @ $6/cy $15,000 300 CY Subgrade excavation @ $3/cy 900 300 CY Select granular borrow @ $6/cy 1,800 1,700 TN Class 5 aggregate 100% crushed @ $7.50/tn 12,750 550 IN Bituminous base course @ $13/tn 7,150 210 TN Bituminous wear course @ $14/tn 2,940 45 TN Bituminous material for mixture @ $130/tn 5,850 1,240 IF B618 concrete curb @ $6/lf 7,440 350 SY Bituminous driveway pavement @ $15/sy 5,250 2.0 AC Seed w/mulch @ $1,500/ac 3,000 200 CY Topsoil borrow @ $10/cy 2.000 Subtotal $64,080 + 5% Contingency 3.200 Subtotal $67,280 + 35% Indirect Cost 23.550 Total Street $90,830 500' 4996ftepo LVVd APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BISCAYNE AVENUE (HALLEY'S IST ADDITION) STREET & UTILITY EUPROVEMENTS Project No. 687 Al Sanitary Sewer Parcel Assessable Total scri tion Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment Jialley;s 1st Addition 156 24.34 3,797 Lot 1 Block 1 123 $27.99 $ 3,444 Lot 2 Block 1 156 27.99 4,367 Lot 3 Block 1 156 27.99 4,367 Lot 4 Block 1 156 27.99 4,367 Lot 1 Block 2 123 27.99 3,444 Lot 2 Block 2 156 27.99 4,367 Lot 3 Block 2 156 27.99 4,367 Lot 4 Block 2 156 27.99 4,36 Total Sanitary Sewer 1,182 $33,090 BI Water Main alle 's I st Addition Lot 1 Block 1 123 $24.34 $ 2,994 Lot 2 Block 1 156 24.34 3,797 Lot 3 Block 1 156 24.34 3,797 Lot 4 Block 1 156 24.34 3,797 Lot I Block 2 123 24.34 2,994 Lot 2 Block 2 156 24.34 3,797 Lot 3 Block 2 156 24.34 3,797 Lot 4 Block 2 156 24.34 3.797 Total 19182 $28,77011, 0 Cost is based on 8" equivalent ($38,270 - $9,500 = $28,770) D 49566Vepon.wpd 12 C Service Parcel Number Desch]tion Service Rate/Service Total Halley's 1st Addition Lot 1 Block 1 1 2,913 $ 2,913 Lot 2 Block 1 1 2,913 2,913 Lot 3 Block 1 1 2,913 2,913 Lot 4 Block 1 1 2,913 2,913 Lot 1 Block 2 1 2,912 2,912 Lot 2 Block 2 1 2,912 2,912 Lot 3 Block 2 1 2,912 2,912 Lot 4 Block 2 1 2,912 2.912 Total 8 $23,200 171 Lateral Storm Sewer (Aliznment Al Parcel Parcel Area scri tion (SQ. ft.) Rate/sg. ft Total liallev's 1 st Addition Lot 1 Block 1 30,258 $0.19 $ 5,733 Lot 2 Block 1 38,376 0.19 7,269 Lot 3 Block 1 38,376 0.19 7,269 Lot 4 Block 1 38,376 0.19 7,269 Lot 1 Block 2 30,258 0.19 5,733 Lot 2 Block 2 38,376 0.19 7,269 Lot 3 Block 2 38,376 0.19 7,269 Lot 4 Block 2 38.376 0.19 7,269 Total 290,772 $55,080 4M*qort.v,Vd 13 Street Parcel Assessable scri tion Footage Rate/F.F, Total Tialleyl l st Addition Lot 1 Block 1 123 76.84 $ 9,451 Lot 2 Block 1 156 76.84 11,988 Lot 3 Block 1 156 76.84 11,988 Lot 4 Block 1 156 76.84 11,988 Lot 1 Block 2 123 76.84 9,451 Lot 2 Block 2 156 76.84 11,988 Lot 3 Block 2 156 76.84 11,988 Lot 4 Block 2 156 76.84 11.988 Total 19,182 $90,830 49566VcpmwN 14 SUMMARY PRELDIINARY ASSESSMENT BISCAYNE AVENUE (HALLEY'S IST ADDITION) STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Project No. 687 .39 49566VeMLv,pd15 Lateral Parcel Sanitary Water Storm Sewer Description Sewer. LVlain Service (Alienment Al S= Total Halley's 1 st Addition Lot 1 Block 1 $ 3,444 $ 2,994 $ 2,913 $ 5,733 $ 9,451 $ 24,535 Lot 2 Block 1 4,367 3,797 2,913 7,269 11,988 30,334 Lot 3 Block 1 4,367 3,797 2,913 7,269 11,988 30,334 Lot 4 Block 1 4,367 3,797 2,913 7,269 11,988 30,334 Lot 1 Block 2 3,444 2,994 2,912 5,733 9,451 24,534 Lot 2 Block 2 4,367 3,797 2,912 7,269 11,988 30,333 Lot 3 Block 2 4,367 3,797 2,912 7,269 11,988 30,333 Lot 4 Block 2 4,367 3.797 2.912 7.269 11,988 30.333 Total $33,090 $28,770 $23,300 $55,080 $90,830 $231,070 .39 49566VeMLv,pd15 0 I I I I I i N a s00 1000 kale in foot LOCATION PLAN CLIFF ROAD (C.S.A.H. EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 BISCAYNE AVENUE (HALLEY'S ADD.) STREET & UTIL. IMP., CITY PROD. No. 687 49566FOI.DWG DECEMBER 1995 COMM. 49566 C r r\v%;Gl,. I I LOCATION jjBonesfroo W. Rosene Anderlik A Associafes I i I CA OL r I ST1 RGET LP -26.1 gA6ZAR)" %ST/ASG_ 1 jr\ ,iiiJ:i '010-82`�•��`- A) �FUTUA'E SAN/TA/'Y A\. n sE�EJQ 1 171 fr • I ! i ��/frj � � I LP -23A 021-79 1'l 7 � rl,4lr � li 1 f -1 f! f 11 I } fr 022-79 I(r1; f 1 I f 11 r 11 t 1 t f j 1 GUN I CL UB I I ROAD I I u� Outlol 'A' N-, 1 1 ' � I r 111 �O • �-��: it I ; � I �SF,�fR I ''' ''' _Svc. 1 r 41 Lu O 'I 3 C- IN ��!fl st �1 I; I; ,S4NWY ' I `' SElfYEf�I I 010-80 I POND LP -2-T I N 0 100 200 SmIN In tet SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA BISCAYNE AVE. (HALLEY'S ADD.) STREET & UTILITY IMP., CITY PROJ. No. 49566F02.DWG DECEMBER 1995 COMM. OUTLW E =-- 2 0 Q� \. .----------------------------- S 1 1 ' � I 011-81 l; FIGURE 2 687 49565 Sonestroo ® Rosene Anderlik d Associates I C 12 ''• :: f i +f f 11 13 CARSOL STREET 032-0- �;+ t OUTLOT I C Q� !i:' •` { I I G\ i A�010-82 "Z% . -.a. +'"' -- ij•� J f': 411 01 y y 71 I •rr.+r f ( i� l rJi, f1 I ' l� f riJ �,•. ,, 1 j, � k i7 f 021-79 r f I j�lli - 11 022-79 it ^'�;Jl�� r —•' rtI I�t� . , ,lrLP' CLUB 1 ROAD GUNr N �t r DL:q ,n1�1 i I i uI Outlot --------------------------- t i I 011-61 "ems 121, ASSESSABLE 1407,40E SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE I BISCAYNE AVE. (HALLEY'S ADD.) STREET & UTILITY IMP., CITY PROJ. No. 687 49566r02.0WG DECEMBER 1995 COMM. 49566 Ufa Sonestroo © Rosene Anderlik d Associates ------------------------------------ ---------------------------------1010-80 010-80�1 H --------------------------- t i I 011-61 "ems 121, ASSESSABLE 1407,40E SANITARY SEWER ASSESSMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE I BISCAYNE AVE. (HALLEY'S ADD.) STREET & UTILITY IMP., CITY PROJ. No. 687 49566r02.0WG DECEMBER 1995 COMM. 49566 Ufa Sonestroo © Rosene Anderlik d Associates il}12 t 13 ` 1 CAROL m PDND t STREET LP -26.1 OUTLOT C r 1 Outlot 'A' •� t i J�jv , / / J J /i f'sI N iI ., h,!!h'� r1 t -1 rr POND LP-2.?A 021-79 f' ol 01-1 A. /,v G r•.03 r 1 Outlot 'A' •� t i J�jv , / / J J /i f'sI N iI ., h,!!h'� r1 t -1 rr POND LP-2.?A 021-79 r 1 Outlot 'A' A01N N iI ., h,!!h'� r1 t -1 rr POND LP-2.?A 021-79 f' r 7" 022-79 i�ht( ri t rl ii GUN CLUBIIi ROAD 4-- Ea i' M,4MR ' 5 _1'� Outlot 'A' A01N N 3 r � J ; K�L • O i OUTLOT 8 I O•I ----------------------------------- - r-- ---------- ------------------ 010-80 ------------ -010-80 011-81 N 0 100 200 Sole in feel WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 BISCAYNE AVE. (HALLEY'S ADD.) STREET & UTILITY IMP., CITY PROJ. No. 687 113 AQr%AAf:n: nwr. nrrrunrp 1005 rmAAA AOc,RR Sonestroo t0 Rosene Anderlik & Associates A01N pil -- 3 r � J ; K�L • O i OUTLOT 8 I O•I ----------------------------------- - r-- ---------- ------------------ 010-80 ------------ -010-80 011-81 N 0 100 200 Sole in feel WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 4 BISCAYNE AVE. (HALLEY'S ADD.) STREET & UTILITY IMP., CITY PROJ. No. 687 113 AQr%AAf:n: nwr. nrrrunrp 1005 rmAAA AOc,RR Sonestroo t0 Rosene Anderlik & Associates �J j1 IS[ \ !u 1 – Outlot I '^ ID t �' D10-82,- . J 5 1 . e� i r 3 .J J :y Jt_—__----------------_---_---_----- titt I Jl!►i ` �.; pow ( 1 ist � �t 1213 PONE LP -2J7 010-80 1� tl CwOo STREET /63 ' •--�� iin�tJ / � , • is �( �J j1 IS[ \ !u 1 – Outlot I '^ ID t �' D10-82,- . J 5 1 . e� i r 3 .J J :y Jt_—__----------------_---_---_----- titt I Jl!►i ` �.; pow ( 1 I ; ; PONE LP -2J7 010-80 1� tl It ;;;;;;` LP-2.�A •--�� iin�tJ / 021-79 iJ �:tfrr 022-79 ,, / i •-. ; , ,; r ; T ,: GUN CLUB ! i ROAD L--=�rrli� tom— f �J j1 IS[ \ !u 1 – Outlot I '^ ID t �' D10-82,- . J 5 1 . e� i r 3 .J J :y Jt_—__----------------_---_---_----- titt I Jl!►i ` It'll rl r! ( 1 I ; ; PONE LP -2J7 010-80 1� tl N Q_ ,aa zeo scam in fest WATER MAIN ASSESSMENTS 1ZO, ASSESSABLE r00b40E EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 5 BISCAYNE AVE. (HALLEY'S ADD.) STREET & UTILITY IMP., CITY PROJ. No. 687 AGSRFrns nwr- nrrrmnra icor, rnuAA 4oFRF 011-81 l l Sonestroo Rosene Anderlik b 1 Associates 0 Nil! L - e=amu '--Z : wlr 1 ,11• � I'�iiin� EhWJILU f�i�fHi�; It I LA- ZNIL � DYE 1 ii of — 5. If 6 1 II ■nw 1 'i. �t4'VV O O ;, 0 h0 0 IN In VZh�� E------------------ J H« Ju ur- O C� Aw 0 h h -w ;.t-2 '----------j----�1CN ----•--- --C4 It yin� O� 1 1? a < O - 1 Of! yJI _ i m 11 Q W W Z F W Z Q m W to Z zQuj w: �aL'c N : �I � m 0 J .A- it. 12 I CA I STREET LP -26.1032-0 r /; : ;'•% Gj 1 D � r Outlet '1 IV \� �� //`l;��;;/ / ' :yam,`` ````- J r•,'�i 010-82 ) N Stole in f"t S 4 4 GUTTER b 3 Q W �0 3 0 ' CURB dl I r`,' ;•` POND LP-2,�A ;''��;�� 021-79 f,j I ;!r�! 022-79 GUN CLUB ROAD -fill; S ----_.-----------------------.--. ----. r'rf, 1, 1 oto -8o N Stole in f"t S 4 4 GUTTER b 3 Q W �0 3 0 2In L£GENO �� me, ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE STREET IMPROVEMENTS & ASSESSMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 7 BISCAYNE AVE. (HALLEY'S ADD.) STREET & UTILITY IMP., CITY PROD. No. 687 Z16 49566FQ4.DWG DECEMBER 1995 COMM. 49566 juSonestroo Rosene Anderlik b Associates ' MEMO _city of eagan TO: FILE FROM: MICHAEL P FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: APRIL 11, 1996 SUBJECT: CITY PROJECT NO 687, BISCAYNE AVE STS & UTILITIES INFORMATIONAL MEETING At 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 5, 1996, City staff, consisting of myself and Mark Hanson of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, hosted an informational meeting with the following property owners regarding improvements to Biscayne Avenue in the Halley's Addition: • Kevin Mellon, 4816 Biscayne Ave. • Rick Skinn, 4890 Biscayne Ave. • John Young, 4870 Biscayne Ave. • Bill Schiltz, 4860 Biscayne Ave. • Don Marotzke, 700 Gun Club Rd. • Ted Wood, 4881 Biscayne Ave. • Diana & Art Mulvihill, 4841 Biscayne Ave. After a brief introduction by City staff, Mark Hanson provided an overview of the information contained in the draft feasibility report for the Biscayne Avenue improvements. The property owner of Lot 1, Block 2, stated they were contemplating a 20' easterly expansion of their existing building and questioned what building code requirements would apply to the expansion of the existing building. Staff referred the property owner to the building inspection department for the building code requirements. Generally, the buildings within the Halley's Addition are approximately 6,000 -10,000 SF in size. The property owners requested information on fire requirements, sprinkling requirements inside the building, what size water service was required for the 6,000 - 10,000 SF of building given the fire code requirements, and what building use options were available to the property owners. Again, staff referred these questions to the City's Fire Marshal and the Building Inspection Department. Staff also stated they would see if there is general information on the size of water service required for a typical building within the Halley's Addition. Staff reviewed the water service size requirements with the Fire Marshal and the plumbing inspectors and there are no typical numbers included within the plumbing code or the fire code. (See attached letter to property owners in this regard.) y ? The property owners noted the locations of their well and septic systems on the exhibits prepared in the draft feasibility report. Staff stated they would include the locations of the wells and septics for each of the parcels in the final draft of the report. The property owners questioned the feasibility of the storm sewer installation between Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1 in the Halley's Addition. They questioned the feasibility of the storm sewer installation between these two lots discharging into a ditch section across the westerly adjacent property. As a result, staff included a second alignment alternative in the feasibility report which provided a cost estimate for a storm sewer alignment which paralled Biscayne Avenue south to Gun Club Road thence westerly along Gun Club Road and discharging into Pond LP 23 (Gun Club Lake). Staff explained to the property owners there would be an additional cost associated with this alternative, but the property owners seemed to agree with the conceptual idea of directing the storm sewer along Biscayne Avenue and Gun Club Road versus dealing with the property owner to the west. The property owners questioned the need for a "B° type curb versus a mountable type curb. Staff explained the mountable curb is only used in situations where the adjacent property has not been developed such as residential street installation prior to home construction, whereas the Halley's Addition has existing buildings and businesses where driveway locations can more clearly be defined. The property owners questioned the southerly extension of Biscayne Avenue. Staff responded that the extension of Biscayne Avenue is dependent upon development of the southerly adjacent property if and when that occurs. The property owners questioned the timing of requiring connection to the sewer and water system installed within Biscayne Avenue. Staff responded that current City policy does not require connection to the City's system unless the private system is in need of repair or replacement. Th4meeting joumed at approximately 6:15 p.m. Assistant City Engineer MPFrjj . PROPERTY OWNERS ATTENDING INFORMATIONAL MEETING I . _ r'► a •. � � la �� mi_iL .,,0 1 15� 111 17 g } _ SiREET 1 3 - - i3ooiF T.ra�•I -- � / � = la I � l8 04, I I 13ow, I W 12 CPN 'A 1 a �0 R inQ N 7 793 .=1M 244.73, W 7 i+j 1 0 �I I 1 1 I I ozz.n 071-n 4.7..0 CLL17VAT[p rELD NY17 Or 011_.1 012.41 F7 C_/ --- I . _ r'► a 10 Z la } I 3 = la I � W 12 inQ N W 7 1 � :I a 1 � 1 U I I P.r or II ��-�1 ■i^01'1-.1 4.7..0 CLL17VAT[p rELD NY17 Or 011_.1 012.41 F7 C_/ Agenda Information Memo April 16,1996 B. PROJECT 615B2 MEADOWMW ROAD ACTION FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: To close the public hearing and approveldeny/modify Project 615R (Meadowview Road - Streets & Utilities) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. FACTS: On March 19, the Council received the feasibility report for the above -referenced project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on April 16. Several neighborhood informational meetings have been held to review this project with affected property owners. Copies of minutes from those meetings are enclosed. All notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this formal public hearing. ISSUES: Project 615 was originally considered for approval at a public hearing held on August 20, 1991, but was subsequently denied due to objections from affected property owners. However, since that time, Lull Engineering was reactivited as a vibrant industrial manufacturing business and has expanded their operations necessitating the need for storm drainage facilities and improved industrial street access on Meadowview Road. Through the initiative and assistance of Lull Engineering, this project has been revived and is being reconsidered at this public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility report, pages through • Minutes from informational meetings, pages through so Meadow View Road Street and Utility Construction Feasibility Report City of Eagan Minnesota City Project No. 615R SEH No. A-EAGAN9601.00 March 14, 1996 sl Meadow View Road Street and Utility Construction Feasibility Report City of Eagan Minnesota City Project No. 615R SEH No. A-EAGAN9601.00 March 14, 1996 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. V Date: Review By: -Rewf6 u is Forks gt. Date Review By:M�kj ce ept. Date Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive 200 SEH Center St. Paul, Minnesota 55110 (612) 490-2000 4r CZ March 14,1996 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: City of Eagan, Minnesota Meadow View Road Feasibility Report for Street and Utility Construction City Project No. 615R SEH No. A-EAGAN9601.00 ATTN: Thomas Colbert, Director of Public Works Dear Mr. Colbert: Enclosed is our report for storm sewer the street and utility construction in the vicinity of Meadow View Road west of T.H. 13. The proposed improvements are feasible and will benefit the adjacent properties. Estimated costs and preliminary assessment roll are included in this report. We would be pleased to meet with you at your convenience to discuss this report. Sincerely, L�7 —z4 -r'- c 1 0 Leonard C. Newquist, P.E. Project Manager tlo 5.3 Table of Contents Certification Page Letter of Transmittal Table of Contents Page Scope.......................................................... 1 Report Contents ............................................ 1 Background ............................................... 1 Feasibility...................................................... 3 StormSewer .................................................... 3 Roadway....................................................... 3 Utilities........................................................ 4 General............ ..................................... 4 Sanitary Sewer ............................................. 4 WaterMain................ ................................ 4 Easements/Right-of-Way.......................................... 4 Permits........................................................ 5 CostEstimate ................................................... 5 Assessments................................................... 6 RevenueSource ................................................. 6 ProjectSchedule ................................................ 7 Feasibility Report A-EAGAN9601.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page i List of Appendices Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix C Exhibits Exhibit No. 1 - Location Map Exhibit No. 2 - Storm Sewer - Ravine Exhibit No. 3 - Storm Sewer - Meadow View Road Exhibit No. 4 - Typical Street Section Exhibit No. 5 - Street Layout Exhibit No. 6 - Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Exhibit No. 7 - Easement Map Exhibit No. 8 - Storm Sewer Drainage District Exhibit No. 9 - Assessment Map Feasibility Report A-EAGAN9601.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota � Page ii March 14, 1996 Feasibility Report Meadow View Road City of Eagan, Minnesota Scope Report Contents This project consists of the construction of storm sewer facilities to control runoff through a ravine located north of Meadow View Road. Also included in this report is the construction of Meadow View Road and associated sanitary sewer and water main. The properties to both the north and south of Meadow View Road are zoned light industrial. The general location of this project is shown on Exhibit No. 1. Background The storm sewer portion of this report is the result of a grading permit request by Lull Industries (PIN 00900-010-26) for improvements to their property located north of and adjacent to Meadow View Road and west of and adjacent to T.H. 13. The concern with the Lull Industries development was the increased runoff discharging through a ravine located west of the Lull property and north of Meadow View Road. The ravine, located on private property (PIN 00800-030-04), discharges water across highly erodible private property (PIN 00800-010-04) and through a box culvert crossing under the C.P. railroad tracks before entering the Minnesota River Valley. Of particular concern was the erodible soils at the downstream end of the ravine and the potential of the box culvert becoming blocked. A draft report, dated October 12, 1995, was prepared proposing the installation of a storm sewer in the ravine extending from the upstream portion of the ravine to the railroad track box culvert. The ravine storm sewer was identified as a Phase I installation with later phases required when Meadow View Road is improved. All phases of the storm sewer system proposed in the draft October 12, 1995 report are shown on Exhibit No. 2. A-EAGAN9601.00 SI!5 Page 1 An informational meeting was held on October 26,1995 to review the October 12, 1995 draft report storm sewer system. The property owners (PIN 00800-030-04 and PIN 00800-010-04) objected to the storm sewer location on their property. Instead, they favored a storm sewer system to be located in Meadow View Road that collected the storm water before entering into the ravine. The Meadow View Road system is the same as the storm sewer proposed in the Meadow View Road Street Construction Report, City Project No. 615, dated July 16,1991. The Meadow View Road storm sewer like the ravine storm sewer will pick-up storm water from an 11 acre tributary area before it enters into the upstream portion of the ravine. The ravine storm sewer, unlike the Meadow View Road storm sewer will collect storm water runoff from a 2 -acre private property (PIN 00900-010-26 and PIN 00800-030-04) tributary area that discharges directly into the ravine. Both storm sewer systems accomplish the need to intercept storm water runoff before reaching the ravine located on private property. This report addressed the concerns of the property owners by proposing that the storm sewer be located in Meadow View Road. In addiiton, this report proposes the construction of Meadow View Road and associated sanitary sewer and water main similar to the July 16, 1991 report. The street, sanitary sewer and water main improvements were not requested by the adjacent property owners but are proposed in the is report to complete the street and utility improvements in this area of the City. Construction of the improvements can be phased with the storm sewer constructed prior to the street, sanitary sewer, and water main improvements. The improvements in 1991, were denied by the Council because of the high costs and resulting high assessments. Street construction costs were particularly high. The 1991 street section was based on anticipated soil values. The street section proposed Mi this report is based on subsurface investigation, as stated in the Roadway section of this report, which results in a much more economical section without sacrificing needed roadway strength. The total estimated cost of the project in the 1991 report was $456,750 which is approximately $61,000 more than the total estimated costs as proposed herein and as outlined later in this report. The estimated cost of the ravine storm sewer is approximately $49,000 more than the estimated cost of the Meadow View Road storm sewer. A second informational meeting was scheduled on February 20,1996 to review the improvements contained herein. Notices were sent to all property owners adjacent to Meadow View Road; however, one person attended the second informational meeting. Therefore, this report is prepared without public comment, but with direction obtained at the October 26,1995 meeting. Feasibility Report A-EAGAN9601.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 2 Feasibility Based on our study, it is concluded that: 1. The estimated cost for storm sewer, street and utilities, including easements, is $395,725. 2. The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint. 3. It is recommended that the project be constructed as proposed in this report. Storm Sewer The storm sewer as proposed is shown on Exhibit No. 3, and the drainage district is shown on Exhibit No. 8. Design is based on the rationale method of estimating storm water runoff. A 5 year return frequency and a runoff coefficient of 0.7 were used to estimate storm water runoff. Future development was considered in the selection of the runoff coefficient. The drainage district extends to the east side of T.H. 13. Storm water from the area east of T.H. 13 reaches Meadow View Road through a culvert crossing under T.H. 13. The storm sewer as proposed will pickup the drainage at the west end of the culvert. Storm water will discharge into Pond CP -9 through an existing 42" storm sewer crossing under the railroad tracks. Pond CP -9 receives 207 acres of direct runoff and 1,077 acres of ponded runoff, for a total tributary area of 1,284 acres. The storage volume of Pond CP -9 is 63.7 acre feet, with a normal water level elevation of 698.7 feet, a high water level elevation of 702.0 feet and an outflow of 204 cfs. Storm sewer pipe sizes range from 15 -inch to 30 -inch in diameter. Roadway Roadway work proposed consists of a reconstruction of an existing gravel -surfaced roadway. The roadway is proposed to be 36 feet wide, 10 ton design with B-618 concrete curb and gutter. Typical street section is shown on Exhibit No. 4, and the geometrics are shown on Exhibit No. 5. Street section is based on Sigma -N18 design utilizing Hveem stabilimeter R -value on the existing soil recommended in a Soil Investigation Report for the Meadow View Road improvement dated September 7,1991. Meadow View Road will terminate in a cul-de-sac near the railroad right-of-way as shown on Exhibit No. 5. Feasibility Report A-EAGAN9601.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 3 In addition to the above street improvement, nine driveways are proposed to be constructed to serve the adjacent properties. These driveways will built in accordance with Eagan Public Works Department Standard Plate No. 440 for commercial/industrial entrance. Utilities General The properties on the south side of Meadow View Road are developed and are served with City sanitary sewer and water main. A majority of the property on the north side of Meadow View Road is undeveloped. A 12 -inch water main is located on the south side of Meadow View Road right-of-way, and a 12 -inch trunk water main is located on the east side of T.H. 13. A 36 -inch trunk (MCES) sanitary sewer is located on the west side of and adjacent to T.H. 13. An existing City of Eagan sanitary sewer is located on railroad right- of-way just west of Meadow View Road. Sanitary Sewer An 8 -inch sanitary sewer is proposed to serve the westerly three properties north of Meadow View Road as shown on Exhibit No. 6. The parcel north of and adjacent to Meadow View Road and west of and adjacent to T.H. 13 may be served by an existing MCES 36 -inch sanitary sewer located on the west side of T.H. 13. Water Main Two water main service extensions are proposed from the Meadow View Road water main as shown on Exhibit No. 6. This extension will serve the westerly two properties north of Meadow View Road. Six-inch services are proposed to serve these Light Industrial zoned parcels. Easements/Right-of-Way Both permanent and temporary easements are shown on Exhibit No. 7. The existing Meadow View Road right-of-way is 30 feet. The existing gravel road encroaches on the northerly private properties. An additional 30 feet of right-of-way is needed over the northerly private properties in order to install the storm sewer and reconstruct Meadow View Road. Also, additional right-of-way is needed to construct the cul-de-sac at the west end of the roadway and additional right-of-way is needed on the south side adjacent to T.H. 13 in order .to maintain a more perpendicular connection to the highway. Temporary easements are necessary for slope grading and are also shown on Exhibit No. 7. Feasibility Report A-EAGAN9601.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 4 Feasibility Report City of Eagan, Minnesota Permits The following regulatory agency permits will be needed: I. Minnesota Department of Health Water Main Extension 2. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Sanitary Sewer Extension 3. Lower Minnesota Watershed District Storm Water Drainage 4. Chicago Northwestern Railroad Work on Railroad Right -of -Way 5. Minnesota Department of Transportation Roadway Work on Highway Right -of -Way Cost Estimate Detailed cost estimates are located in Appendix A. The estimates are based on anticipated 1996 construction costs and include contingency and legal, administration, engineering and bond interest. A summary of the cost are as follows: • Storm Sewer $95,515 • Easements/Right-of-Way 23.800 Subtotal Storm Sewer $119,315 • Roadway 210,060 • Driveways 23,400 • Sanitary Sewer 31,440 • Water Main 11.510 Total Estimate Cost $395,725 A-EAGAN9601.00 Page 5 Assessments Assessments will be based on final construction costs plus related overhead expenses, estimated to be 35 percent of the construction cost and all costs associated with easement and right-of-way acquisition. The assessments will be spread over a 15 year period with the interest rate determined by the results of the bond sale. Assessments will be made in accordance with current City policy and in the following manner: Storm Sewer - On an area basis to that portion of the property within the storm drainage district as shown on Exhibit No. 8. The City will participate for that portion of the district east of T.H. 13. Roadway - One-half of the cost assessed on a front foot basis and one-half of the cost on the number of existing or potential future connecting driveways. Driveway - Unit assessment based on the number of existing or potential future driveways. Sanitary Sewer - Unit assessment based on the number of properties served. Water Main - Unit assessment based on the number of properties served. Exhibit No. 9 shows the type of assessment to each of the parcels adjacent to Meadow View Road. Revenue Source All of the costs for this improvement is proposed to be assessed in accordance with current City policy. Feasibility Report A-EAGAN9601.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Page 6 Feasibility Report City of Eagan, Minnesota Project Schedule Informational meeting February 20, 1996 Draft report due March 14,1996 Present report March 19,1996 Hearing April 16,1996 Plans and specifications approved May 20,1996 Award construction contract June 18,1996 Substantial completion September 1996 * Final assessment hearing February 1997 First payment due with real estate taxes May 1998 * Date dependent upon scope of construction A-EAGAN9601.00 Page 7 Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate Meadow View Road City Project No. 615R r.� Meadow View Road City Project No. 615R Storm Sewer Preliminary Cost Estimate Description Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Amount 12" Storm Sewer L.F. 35 19 665 15" Storm Sewer L.F. 435 21 91351 18" Storm Sewer L.F. 1501 24 3600 21" Storm Sewer L.F. 115, 27 3105 24" Storm Sewer L.F. 215 31 6665 27" Storm Sewer L.F. 480. 35 16800 30" Storm Sewer L.F. 1201 37 4440 15" Apron Each 1 650 6501 48" Manhole L.F. 691 1601 11040i 60" Manhole L.F. 16. 230 3680. Manhole Casting I Each ! 101 300: 3000 Beehive Casting Each 1 340 340 Connect to Exist. M.H. Each 1 4001 400 Connect Exist. Pipe to M.HJ Each 2, 4001 8001 Subtotal Storm Sewe $64j320 +10% Construction Contin encie� 64321 Estimated Construction Cosi $70,7521 +35% Le al Admin.. EnQineeriftc L&Bond Interest) 24763 I Total Estimated Cost - Storm Sewer i $95,5151 6Y Meadow View Road City Project No. 615R Roadway Preliminary Cost Estimate Description Clear and Grub Trees Unit. Est. Qty. 1 Unit Each 81 ! Common Excavation { C.Y. Topsoil Borrow C.Y. Sub rade Preparation Rd. St Aggre2ate Base, C1.5 Ton 1 Type 41 Wear Ton Type 31 Base Ton Tack_ Coat Gal. 1 Conc. Valle Gutter 1 L.F. 11 B-618 Conc. Curb L.F. ! Adjust Valve Box 1 Each 1 12" Catch Basin Leads 1^ L.F. 1 Catch Basin L.F. Catch Basin Casting Each Remove Culverts L.F. 1 Sodding__ 1 S.Y. 2800 5801 14 2140 750 I 10001 3001 4801 28001 61 1951 321 81 2401 2500' 281 210001 251 11 141 25000! 3001 672011 71 19600 1301 780 351 68251 1401 44801 320 2 2 2560 480 5000 Seeding Mulch, Type I Disc Anchoring Amount 1 4001 $3,200 61 168001 91 52201 1501 2100! 81 17120 281 210001 251 11 141 25000! 3001 672011 71 19600 1301 780 351 68251 1401 44801 320 2 2 2560 480 5000 Seeding Mulch, Type I Disc Anchoring Acre 1 Ton Acre 11 5401 21 2251 1 1 1001 5401 4501 100 I Hydrant Extension L.F. _ 41 1201 4801 Silt Fence Bale Check L.F. . Each 12001 21 I 601 51 01 24001 30011 Subt_.,otal Roadway 1 +10% Construction Contingencies $141,455 14146 1 ` Estimated Construction Cost! $155,601 ' +35% Legal, Admin., Engineering & Bond Interest' 54459' 1 _ Total Estimated Cost - Roadway $210,0601 6S Meadow View Road City Project No. 6158 Driveways Preliminary Cost Estimate Description Unit Est. O!X. Unit Price I Amount Aggregate Base, CI.5 Ton 160 $8 . $1,280 Conc. DrivewayAron S.Y. 500 29 14500 Subtotal driveways $15,7801 Plus 10% Contin en 1578 Estimated Construction Cost 1 $17,358 Plus 35% Legal, Admin. En ineerin & Bond Interesi 6042 Total Estimated Cost Drivewa i $23,4;0 1 Meadow View Road City Project No. 615R Sanitary Sewer Preliminary Cost Estimate Description Unit Est. Qty. Unit Price Amount 8" Sanitary Sewer 8'- 10' Deep L.F. 325 $19 $6,1-75, 8" Sanitary Sewer 10'- 12' Deep L.F. 2601 22 5720, Std. Manhole 8' Deep Each 3 1300 3900 Additional Manhole L.F. 16 110 1760 Service W es Each 3 55 165 6" Service Pie L.F. 150 15 2250 Connect to Exist. Manhole Each 11 1200 1200 Subtotal Sanita Sewerl $21,1701 +10% Contingencies 21171 Estimated Construction Cosi $23,287 ' +35% Legal, Admin., Engineering & Bond Interes 8153 Total Estimated Cost - Sanitary _Sewer' .$31,440 0 Meadow View Road City Project No. 615R Watermain Preliminary Cost Estimate Descri tion Unit i Est. Ct . Unit Price Amount 6" Watermain L.F. 1201 $_46 $1,920 8" Watermain L.F. 100 19 1900 6" Gate Valve & Box Each 2 550 1100 Fittings Pound 600 3 1800 Cut into & Connect to Existina W.M. Each 1 730 730 Connect to Exist. W.M. Each 1 3001 300 Subtotal Watermain $7,7501 +10% Contin encies 775 Estimated Construction Cosi $8,5251 +35% Legal, Admin.. Enqineerinq & Bond Interest 29851 Total Estimated Cost - Watermaini $11,5101 Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll Meadow View Road City Project No. 615R •+�,M!CD!LnIcoIm10)'CID imlr', CI'W•Lo O OI iLn.LomoIN1 I d:'c iCD1^i LA l to l'n! SCD ICD1 �:INILL�ILD�f�ICDIcOltnCD�O+N �.� W�Ln!tt7;0�1� O10!r;CD�u')I OI W co1co;COiLAI1 N:CY;co; N W1 ~ p"LA!L)Icr)Ic),to1�I N Wil1 NN I la :I f +C,I 0101 Wlj OO! 1 EII Ln iui �I ^inl 31I Lo Ln I. �0l0101 0 0101 ml m; Icilolo x! co co I co cl tyi' v vIv Nlyl OrIOrITOI I 1 WIO!010!O!010101 OI 710101010c l a O! �N C.fICOpICOpIIR!COp_ILLICIOI wI 1 olNlNlN1NIto Ir�NI wI I cr) m Lo M co10 CDIco!rl 0 2 NILn10101r,LC11tn1 N VI-1micciINIO!f- LAIcVICDICD) Q Q 11— y�U, (O OILAINIO N Z!plInlvlN cA O,vICp LD OI t0 "��F—�oD!O n O 71icolicoiv�NIlco Nir N TN Z 4)010!010 OIOIOI OI V y WI 2.. 010 0 3 O a NI 13ilOhiOl^Ini�lLLco OSI t'yllCp!(npICDICpIriWICDi .Cpl W W I.`ilrtrlrlr1°' lnlrt rl CU �' C Dllr rlririNl Irl TI 2a F ! coico Ln1COlco1Im LOIC!Dlr, I I WINLnIOIOIr;LnjLmiglNl d Imlmw 04 0INt01NICDIcD1 �O..IIm10 0 r-imi DILnIO to C'IcoIco LnINtcoICp OfILO N OicDIoD LAlp�lv!OICp tD M WN I IT r Id lot 1 pp pp ttpi OIO10! • £i ylit0l 1 01 c co01 V: e E ! 0 ; Cp uluwl wo r fs13: 11k d? NIS I ��I1 n ~I I i i W I .!,m 0 I I I Lp Ln C.00 �• 1+ r N NI��UI,mi T. Lnl �Iaf�►C�'I TI IQI vITI !=1 1 7� I 30l01o�0�!LnfO of 0 .I �iW Ir rlr�r NIO r r, LA WTI rol—lWljOtOlOIOiOIOiOIOIOI 0 C WIOiCICIC 0!0iC10 LDI cCp pILLi1C0!O1N 0 cm c71Ln 0Xo1 N V i�ILO 'rirtNlOIN N N Ito viv'TITI0icm NIv;0i0 O 9I9I9I9 OIOIOIO 0 0 0 0 0 ^f Z;TIOp jT!NIN r!LAIrITINi �II1hIO!0!1O.OfOIOIO1i `�iO!0LjOINI(dO!OOOO!0 OI'S !OO � I i IImlN1Nl_IO;O:OICDF,0 I0i0;0 LVNV0 O Appendix C Exhibits Meadow View Road City Project No. 615R a N LOCATION MAP 902 FILE N0. � w EAGAN9601 MEADOW ROADVIEW ROAD PROJECT NO. 615R EXHIBIT 3/14/96 EAGAN, MINNESOTA NO.1 Lin, nv i' 1 AA I,- tK \ O -.� a rV Q�/ ::1 •..I.�'� 'lie � / / � / 30" �' ;7 s Ll \ STORM SEWER i RAVINE FILE N0. ii EAGA9601 MEADOW VIEW ROADDATEXHIBIT PROJECT NO. 61SR �� /4/96 EAGAN, MINNESOTA NO. 2 c 4 Al \fir; STORM SEWER MEADOW VIEW ROAD F E No. MEADOW VIEW ROAD EAGA9601 PROJECT NO. 615R EXHIBIT DATE:96 EAGAN, MINNESOTA NO. 3 'tet•^ " i i L c 4 Al \fir; STORM SEWER MEADOW VIEW ROAD F E No. MEADOW VIEW ROAD EAGA9601 PROJECT NO. 615R EXHIBIT DATE:96 EAGAN, MINNESOTA NO. 3 0 TYPICAL STREET SECTION FILE' NO. MEADOW ROADVIEW ROAD EAGAN9601 DATE: PROJECT NO. 61SR 3/14/96 EAGAN, MINNESOTA EXHIBIT NO. 4 O rr•: � ..r.r •� _ � ^ cin `•... DATE: PROJECT NO. 61SR EXHIBIT NO. 5 3/14/96 EAGAN, MINNESOTA •,!. Ila W > ^ lit jJ • :fry O/~' i • W v � rJ,•y ' I � � // 1 7 FUTURE R LINE``; UD F �� L in4 • j ��} �. STREET LAYOUT �;.. Al FILE NO. MEADOW VIEW ROAD EAGA9601 DATE: PROJECT NO. 61SR EXHIBIT NO. 5 3/14/96 EAGAN, MINNESOTA EXISTING -�YDRANT _ •� itw? -, 1i l EXI fiING HYDRANT � 7•�4. � 7r�r:ylr 7? i' i EXT'8TING H DRA \N11 \ FUTURE R/ INE EXISTING LIFT~STATI\ �Y+ \ \ w = ;SANITARY SEWER & W '.. \l��J` WATERMAIN CONNECT TO l UPSTREAM MANHOLE W FILE No. MEADOW VIEW ROAD EAGA9601 c' s DATE: PROJECT NO. 615R EXHIBIT NO. 6 314/96 ALAN, MINNESOTA 9 FILE No. MEADOW VIEW ROAD EAGAN9601 PROJECT NO. 615R EXHIBIT �► DATE: NO. 7 3/1496 �EAGAN, MINNESOTA 0 1 —"�lowo 0 - � ��m LEGEND 00900"010-28 I, OOB00-030-04 00800-010-04 4�A1 00800-020-04 ---� STORM DISTRICT BOUNDARY ® ASSESSMENT AREA FILE N0. EAGAN9601 DATE: 3/14/96 22480-020-01 39900-010-02 80220-010-01 STORM SEWER .� DRAINAGE DISTRICT MEADOW VIEW ROAD EXHIBIT PROJECT NO. 615R NO. 8 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 00900-010-26 STREET STORM SEWER 00800-030-04 STREET SAN. SEWER 00800-010-04 STREET WATER SAN. SEWER v JJ � 22480-020-01 V NN STREET ``o STORM SEWER 22480-010-01 o STREET po N STORM SEWER 48100-050-0 o STREET " STORM SEWER 02 m I 9•••• •• •, r000 �o STREET a' 0 N 00800- �'�0 020-04 o N c S EET WA R :i -I SAN. SEWE Q AV 00 80220-010-01 N STREET \ � ASSESSMENT MAP FILE NO. MEADOW VIEW ROAD EAGAN9601 EXHIBIT DATE: PROJECT NO. 61SR NO. 9 3/14/96 ALAN, MINNESOTA —city of eagan TO: FILE FROM: MIKE FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: APRIL 12, 1996 SUBJECT: CITY PROJECT NO.615R MEADOWVIEW ROAD - STREETS AND UTILITIES INFORMATIONAL MEETING DISCUSSIONS MEMO As a result of Lull Industries desire to expand its existing facilities located at the northwest quadrant of Meadowview Road and Trunk Highway 13, discussions relative to storm sewer improvements necessary to accommodate the proposed expansions were resumed with the property owners adjacent to Meadowview Road. A past project proposal in 1991 for improvements to Meadowview Road was denied at that time. On October 26,1995, all property owners adjacent to Meadowview Road were noticed and representatives of City staff met with three property owners (Parcels 030-04, 010-04, 010-26) adjacent to Meadowview Road to review a conceptual storm sewer configuration that would address the storm sewer needs for Lull Industries expansion. This conceptual alignment crossed Parcel No. 030-04 "Goldsworthy" and Parcel No. 010-04"Lehner" In reviewing this alignment with the directly affected property owners, they were not in favor of an alignment that would incumber their property with a storm sewer construction as well as a permanent utility easement. The property owners suggested reviewing the feasibility of maintaining the storm sewer along the existing Meadowview Road alignment As a result of the discussions at this October 1995 informational meeting, representatives from City staff developed a storm sewer alignment that did not cross the Goldsworthy and Lehner parcels. This alignment is contained within what would be the necessary roadway alignment for a reconstructed Meadowview Road. Also, at the October 1995 informational meeting, the property owners suggested including the reconstruction of Meadowview Road along with the storm sewer in one project. As a result, representatives of City staff prepared a revised feasibility report including the construction of Meadowview Road to current City standards as well as a storm sewer alignment that would be contained within the Meadowview Road street right-of-way. An informational meeting was scheduled for February 20, 1996 at which time one property owner"Lull Industries" attended the informational meeting. Lull Industries basically supports the upgrade of Meadowview Road and the storm sewer construction contained within the roadway. Subsequent to the informational meeting on February 20, 1996, Goldsworthy and Lehner have requested information relative to the proposal being presented for consideration by the City Council on April 16, 1996. Continued attempts to contact the property owners along the south side of Meadowview Road have failed. Representatives of City staff have sent mail notification and attempted to contact the property owners along the south side of Meadowview Road by telephone. As identified in the feasibility report for Project 615R, the storm sewer improvements can be constructed regardless of the reconstruction of Meadowview Road. Meadowview Road construction can take place in conjunction with the storm sewer or can be constructed in a subsequent contract. The current Meadowview Road Street and Utility Feasibility Report includes costs for both options. Assis nt t9ityEngineer MPF85. MMEET.MEM/CB From Wayne A. Goldsworthy 3083 Sibley Memorial Highway (Meadow View Road) Eagan MN 121 October 26, 1995 RE: CITY PROJECT 61 SR MEADOWVIEW STORM SEWER. To Michael P. Foertsch, P.E.&& Assistant City Engineer The following are questions and concerns regarding this proposed project. 1.Why the run-off problem was not recognized when the planing of the numerous additions was approved across Highway 13 on the North end of Coachman Road and Four Oaks Road taken in to consideration. During the last 19 years we have lived here the run off has increased many times. 2.What affect will the easement in middle of my property have on sale or further development as 1 (one) parcel. 3.What type of landscaping finish be accomplished after construction will there be a manhole to the North east of my garage preliminary plan indicates. What excess would the city need for inspection ect? 4.What trees would be removed and will the city forester assess the damage to the root damage to the oak tree adjacent to the garage on my property. 5.On the 20 ft temporary easement close to the garage what precautions will be taken to protect from slippage of the footings. I have a concern of further slippage if a cut is made close to the garage. 6.What configuration slope would there be from meadow view road to the ravine. 7.Question what is the document number granting the present easement on my property for the existence of meadow view road? Wayne A. Goldsworthy Sy imm STRET I WATER TER Ll SAN. SEWER-,,,,., CN pr) CN 0 22430-020-01 STREET STORM SEWER 22480-010-01 STREET STORM SEWER 48100-050-0 b STREET Lo � STORM SEWER .39900-010-0 C:, STREET C) 80220-010-01 i co CN STREET i ASSESSMENT MAP PROPERTY OWNERS ATTENDING INFORMATIONAL MEETING Agenda Information Memo April 16,1996 C. PROJECT 643R, TIMBERLINE ADDITION (ST RECONSTRUCTION) ACTION FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: To close the public hearing and approvelmodify the final assessment roll for Project 643R (Oslund-Timberline Addition - Street Reconstruction) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • On March 19, 1996, the City Council received the final assessment roll for the above -referenced project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on April 16 to formally present the roll for consideration of final adoption. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of their final assessment obligation. As of this date, staff has not received any objections to the proposed assessments. • An informational neighborhood meeting was held on Monday, April 1, to review the proposed final assessments with affected/interested property owners. Only three of the 109 property owners attended this meeting. A summary of that informational neighborhood meeting is enclosed. • The final assessment roll was prepared taking into consideration the Council's direction at the time of approving the project to reduce curb and gutter assessments to properties that did not have direct frontage to McCarthy Road and to limit the assessment amount to the preproject appraisal and/or calculated cost, whichever was less. • Subsequently, the final assessment rates are substantially less than the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the original public hearing held on June 20, 1995. ATTACHMENTS: • Informational neighborhood meeting minutes, ages ,_V and • Final Assessment Roll, pages -9through . 0 I Sonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects Bonestroo. Rosene, Antrerhe ..no Assoc:.+te:. Inc rs an Alfirmabve Action Equal Opportunity EMDIOVef Principals- Otto G. Bonestroo. PE. • JOSebh C. Anderlik. PE. - Marvin L. Sorvala. PE. - Richaro E. Turner, PE. • Glenn R Cook. P.E. - Thomas E. Noyes. PE. - Robert G Schunicht. P.E. Jerry A Bourdon. PE. • Roriert 'N Rusene, PE. and Susan M Eberhn. C.PA.. Senior Consultants Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE. - Keith A. Gordon, P.E. - Robert R. Pfefferle, PE Richard W Foster. P.E. -Da: id O. Loskota. PE. • Robert C. Russek. A.I.A. - Mark A. Hanson, PE Michael T. Rautmann. PE. - Ted K.Field, P.E. Offices. St. Paul and Rochester. MN - Mequon. WI 1%J�l—I�146INC- +1 TO: Mike Foertsch FROM: Mark Hanson DATE: April 4, 1996 MEMO RE: Project 643R - Oslund-Timberline Addition Final Assessment Informational Meeting — ►A, x v 'tx-s Monday, April 1, 1996 Our File No. 49532 Three property owners attended the informational meeting, as listed below: l�� '�� 19 ►�VJ 1. Larry McNurlin - 3036 McCarthy Ridge (Lot 7 McCarthy Ridge) - - 2. Greg Stevenson - 3030 Sibley Memorial Hwy (Lot 2 McCarthy Ridge) 3. Gene Miller - 3061 Loon Lane (Lot 22 Block 4 Oslund-Timberline Addition) Relative to construction, the following concerns were mentioned by each property owner: The property owner of Lot 2 felt his driveway to McCarthy Road near T.H. 13 was too narrow and felt it needed to be widened. It was noted because concrete curb did not previously exist, the access to his driveway was less restrictive than it is now with concrete curb. We stated we would Iook at the new driveway and determine if it is more restrictive. The property owner of Lot 7 noted the private drive that accesses McCarthy Road from their property was raised because the elevation of McCarthy Road was raised to match the boulevards on either side of the drive. In addition, the elevation was raised to prevent drainage from McCarthy Road onto the private driveway. It was stated that to improve the grade, considerably more paving was done in the driveway to provide a gentler slope to McCarthy Road. 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN SS113-3898 ■ 612-636-4600 Mr. Mike Foertsch City of Eagan Re: Oslund-Timberline Addition Page -2- April 4, 1996 • Manhole covers were noted as being low. It was stated they would be inspected to determine if they were within tolerance. In some areas reflective cracking has also occurred. It was noted reflective cracks will occur shortly after construction. Reflective cracking will be controlled in the future through crack sealing and seal coat. • The property owner in Loon Lane cul-de-sac expressed concern relative to drainage in the cul-de-sac. It was noted the high point in the cul-de-sac was offset to match the existing boulevards and driveways located in the northeast corner of the cul-de-sac. The fact that snow is stockpiled in the center of the cul- de-sac does cause snow melt to sheet across the cul-de-sac to the gutter, creating ice. It was also noted the two large pines on his property do prevent the sun from warming the asphalt to melt the ice. • All three property owners felt they were paying for mistakes made many years ago when the homes on the north side of McCarthy Road were constructed opposite Red Cedar Road, blocking the overland drainage. Staff responded that, although storm sewers were constructed to improve the drainage in this area, those costs were not assessed and are the responsibility of the City. The other issue of concern was relative to the assessments and the process to appeal those assessments. In general, the two property owners in McCarthy Ridge objected to their assessment because they don't have any frontage on McCarthy Road. Although their assessment does not include concrete curb, they were of the opinion their assessment was still too high and the amount should be reduced further. The property owner in Loon Lane felt the assessment was substantially higher than the benefit received, and the condition of the existing streets before the project was just fine. The property owners also expressed concern regarding the snow plowing efforts this winter in their area. It was felt the snow plows travel too fast in McCarthy Road from T.H. 13, such that the snow spills into the center of the road. It was also noted a mailbox at McCarthy Road and T.H. 13 was knocked down, and sod in the area was damaged due to plowing. It was stated the mailbox would be put back and the sod would be replaced this spring similar to other areas in Eagan. Z N 1/ SEC 0 9 N PROPERTY OWNERS ATTENDING INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS C.S.A.N. NO.26 7(LONE�OAK RD.)_ _ 1 4 103.07' 15254' MCCAQ ruA L 9 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NUMBER 643R ASSESSMENT HEARING DATE: A ril 16 1996 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Oslund Thberline PUBLIC HEARING DATE: June 20 1995 IMPROVEMENT INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report SANTTARY FINAL F.R. SEWER RAS RATES Trunk ❑ Laterals Service 11Lat. BenefiVrrunk wax Tnmk STORM FINAL F.R. SEWER TES RATES Trunk ❑ Laterals 1-1 Lat Benefitfrtvnk STREETS El Gravel Base $2,224.884,ot S2,947/Lot Exist Curb IlLaterais ® Surfacing S3.224.884,ot S5.125/Lot w/out Curb 13Service 13 Res. Equiv. Off. Benefit/Trunk []Multi Equiv. O WAC ❑ C/I Equiv. Trail SEWICES SMET LIGHTS E]Water & Sea Sewer 0 Installation Energy Charge CONTRACT # OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY —�Lo- PARCELS ChM RATE ASSESSED FINANCED 5510,708 F.R. 5305,597 F.R. 95-08 109 15 Years 7.0% S323.511.92 $362.630.17 COMMENTS:. ASSFSSbIEN MS5SAFURM w {: city of eagan TO: DEANNA KIVI, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CLERK FROM: GERALD R. WOBSCHALL DATE: MARCH 6, 1996 SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL - PROJECT NO. 643R OSLUND TIMBERLINE STREET RECONSTRUCTION MEMO The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing on June 20, 1995 ordered Project 643R. According to the feasibility report the following improvements were to be constructed and/or assessed. The improvements are: sanitary sewer manhole upgrades, and the location and replacement of 15 existing curb boxes, replacement of 600 lineal feet of watermain, street drainage, and street reconstruction. On August 8, 1995 the Council amended the feasibility assessment rates by establishing the following assessment rates: $3,500 per lot for street reconstruction and concrete curb and gutter, where curb and gutter did not exist, and $2,500 per lot for street reconstruction where curb and gutter existed. Construction is being completed underContract 95-08. Final payment has not been made to the contractor at this time. The assessment hearing is scheduled for April 169 1996. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll. I. PROJECT COST No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment roll. `l/ Construction Other Improvement Improvement Costs Costs Costs Sanitary Sewer $10,760.00 $ 3,754.40 $ 14,514.40 Water 25,200.53 8,793.03 33,993.56 Street Drainage 1.12,505.54 39,355.69 151,761.23 Curb and Gutter Installation 119,196.19 41,590.21 160,786.40 Street Reconstruction 239,709.04 83,639.83 323,348.87 Curb and Gutter Repair 1.288.16 449.47 1.737.63 TOTAL 5508.659.46 5177.482.63 .5686.142.09 IL ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment roll. `l/ B. UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Sanitary Sewer Manhole Reconstruction The sanitary sewer improvements consisted of reconstruction of the manhole structures at a construction cost of $10,760.00. Other costs in the amount of $3,754.40 were added which results in an improvement cost of $14,514.40. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be financed by the Sanitary Sewer division of the City's Utility Fund. 2. Water The water service improvements consisted of the location, repair of 14 curb boxes and replacement of 500 feet of water main. The construction cost of these improvements was $25,200.53. Other costs in the amount of $8,793.03 to the construction cost which results in an improvement cost of $33,993.56. According to the feasibility report this improvement is to be financed by the Water division of the City`s Utility Fund. 3. Street Drainage Improvements The storm sewer improvements included the replacement, modification and expansion of the existing system. The construction costs totaled$112,505.54. Other costs in the amount of $39,255.69 were added which results in an improvements cost of $151,761.23. The Major Street Fund will finance the cost of these improvements. 4. Curb and Gutter Installation According to the analysis supplied by the City's consulting engineers, the following items and quantities were used to determine the cost of the installed curb and gutter. Description Price Quantity Cost B618 Concrete Curb $5.50 /L. F. 11,508 L.F. $63,294.00 Reinforcing for Curb .51 /L. F. 1,041 L. F. 530.91 6" Concrete Driveway Repair 23.69 /Sq. Yd. 284 Sq. Yd. 6,727.96 3" Bituminous Driveway Repair 9.50 /Sq. Yd. 2,377 Sq. Yd. 22,581.50 Topsoil Borrow 8.13 /Cu. Yd. 914 Cu. Yd. 7,430.82 Sod 1.50 /Sq. Yd. 12,334 Sq. Yd. 18,501.00 Aggregate Base CL5 10.00 /Ton 13 Ton 130.00 Construction Cost $119,196.19 Other Costs at 34.89° $41_,590.21 Improvement Cost $1 0606 •7. According to the feasibility report and the existing City assessment policy, curb and gutter is 100% assessed when the curb is installed to raise the improvement to City standards. The curb and gutter installed under this improvement meets those standards. The City Council at the meeting of June 20, 1995 deleted the curb and gutter assessments from 6 of the 87 lots that were proposed in the feasibility report. Based on that action 81 lots are used to compute the improvement rate. Arm The improvement rate is determined in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST $160,786.40 ASSESSABLE UNITS 81 LOTS IMPROVEMENT RATE $1,985.02/LOT The improvement rate of $1,985.02/lot exceeds the pre -project benefit of $1,000.00/lot determined by appraisal and approved by Council. Because state law limits assessing amounts greater than the benefit, this improvement will be assessed at the rate of $1,000.00 per lot. 5. Street Reconstruction The street reconstruction improvement was constructed at a cost of $239,709.04. Other costs in the amount of $83,639.83 were added to the construction cost which results in an improvement cost of $323,348.87. The improvement and assessment rates were determined in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT COST UNITS RATE $323,348.87 109 LOTS $2,966.50/LOT It is City policy to participate in street reconstruction costs a minimum of 25%. The assessable portion of the costs then is equal to 100% - 25% = 75%. IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT RATE FACTOR RATE $2,966.50/LOT X's .75 $2,224.88 /LOT The assessment rate was established at $2,500 per lot by the Council based upon pre - project appraisals. Because the computed project assessment rate of $2,224.88 is less than the $2,500.00 appraisal rate, the $2,224.881Lot rate will be used in this assessment roll. 6. Concrete Curb and Gutter Repair The concrete curb and gutter repair was performed at a construction cost of $1,288.16. Other costs in the amount of $449.47 were added resulting in an improvement cost of $1,737.63. This expenditure is to be financed by the City's Major Street Fund. C. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT RATES The following table lists the assessment rate charged to the properties. IMPROVEMENT TYPE ASSESSMENT RATES Street reconstruction with new curb and gutter $3,224.28 / Lot Unit Street reconstruction with existing curb and gutter $2,224.28 / Lot Unit D. ASSESSMENT SPREAD The special assessments are spread to the abutting and adjacent parcels. E. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments for this project are to be spread for a term of 15 years at an annual interest rate of 7.0 % on the unpaid balance. 111. CITY REVENUES/RESPONSIBILITIES IMPROVEMENT LIEPROVEMENT COST Sanitary Sewer Lateral Water Street Drainage Street Reconstruction w/Curb & Gutter Curb and Gutter Repair TOTAL $14,514.40 33,993.56 151,761.23 484,135.27 1,737.63 $686,142.09 ASSESSMENT $ 0.00 0.00 0.00 323, 511.92 0.00 $323,511.92 The following funds will provide financing for the listed improvements. Major Street Fund Water Division of the Utility Fund Sanitary Sewer Division of the Utility Fund TOTAL Gerald R. Wobschall Reviewed: Public Works Department 1 Dated: � e,g HCl/ Reviewed: CITY RESPONSIBILITY $14,514.40 33,993.56 151,761.23 160,623.35 1,737.63 $362,630.17 $314,122.21 $33,993.56 $14,514.40 $362,630.17 cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works E. J. VanOverbeke, Director of Finance/City Clerk Jim Sheldon, City Attorney Tom Pepper, Assistant Finance Director 9y 00 Qf o 4 4 4 4 4 4 4L 3N`dl H8VI(300M 3AIaC) 30021 IMA 0 W qrt .Nr :r a rn 4L 4L 4L 4L 4L # ._ N NI N 1 N (O n m t 3AIaC) 30021 IMA O0OMANN3HO 4:2 A cr IV) 0 W qrt .Nr :r a rn n n N J U W O � a Z LLI V) Ni W n ON O0OMANN3HO 4:2 A cr IV) 0 W qrt W CD J U W O � a Z LLI V) Ni W O O a a OP � N N N N MM N J O O W Z 90I 0 N N N N N d N N N N N N N NM -M --m- N N N N N _N N N N N mm mm MN mm N N N m N J m V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O O N N O O O N O N O O N O N O O N N O O O N N O 0 0 m` Z O O pp pp pp pp O pp O O pp pp O pp N N pp O O N N pp pp O N pp N O O N a'-� PPPPO•aDPPPPPPPPAAPPP AA PP'APAPP O N pp O NAO O Ppp N AN 9 A 0O.P K W 7 N. V UN &M V11n to O Nt N1 V% N11n In 1n M A A In M 1nAA 1n In u'1 A 1n A N N A V1 A 1n In A A M. Nv 1n A A In In to >• N N N N N Y 1 N N N N N N N N �T d N I V r4 d 101, N N N d N_ d N N d N C-P. N d d _N _N N d d 1 V N N = � Ln&M Ln Sn N U,'n U, LM L^ .- .- gy p. p Ln &—m N M P LM V% W% pQ, &M .- P •- P � ul P pQ, % P .- � U � In 11'. Y1 Y1 Y1 O Y1 1fl M Y1 11'1 Y1 Y1 Y1 N N 1n � Y1 N N Y1 In In N N N In N N H1 N N Y1 N N V1 11'1 Y1 N N V1 1n Y1 J r Y W m d IL .. W h Y W W t- d d d d d Pd d N d d d 4 d d d d d d d da' NNNNdNV NNNN N N N NNIVNN N N IV N N N idV Nd Nd Nd Nd Nd Nd idV Nd d d d W NNNNd N N N N NNNNNNN N d Nd NN d Nd N N N SK O M M N N M d M N N M M M M M N N M M M N N M M M N M N M M N M N M M N N M M M N N M M M CL J 11 LO OO Lfl IC 00 A Cp Op 00 1D a0 00 N CO CO C00 2 00.9 a I a 2 2 0 Iwo 0 aD fO Ca CD a0 ISO a 00 2 J _a It d d d d Sr" d d d d d d d d 'f d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d N U 11 N d N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N MMN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M O Z" M M N N M d M N N M M M M M N N M M M N N M M M N M N M M N M N M M N N M M M N N M M M r N h . N W Z •�' WW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z _Z Z Z _Z Z Z Z Z Z Z.Z. Z Z Z 4747 G7 V U' C7 JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ O 00000o00��OC OG OCYYOCa a'OC aC OLCYOC OC OCa OC OCYO[d'tY OLCYaaOCKaOC •� W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ... W W W W W W W W JOaYCC CC OLKOL OL _�1�mmmiD fa tOm fammmmmmmmmmmmmmmq1 mmmpo mmmm WA�YYIYI~)r�>O OS SSiSZiS�S SSSZi�SSSi Z=�`S^`ii i2S 1� LL H H ►_- i- % ►- 1� 1- ►- H �- r r- ►- ►� r ZZOC w a'=OC OC OC6 0000000000000000 00 0000 00 0000 oWeUS6.1i V i�07»0.7��» 7 W WUUUUU UU pW pWNpNHf/1 NNN oh ypJ{J�yJyJ (/JIyN{nhNNhhyJ JyJ yJh N(/pJlhhh 009959 g OSONM JtOn ONr9i �T 10��1010 YO O N MIOnvONfO'r10 ONM'f Lm ry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O N O— O O O O O O O O O O Coco 0OOOO O o 0 0 0 0 >~ NN N M 1nggAAltirc�i �� N NNN N M MMM Mme? d dd Y11n 1n V11nle .-ae00000025000000Coco000000000000o0i00000 m 1- . W Z O O O O O O O O O O N1 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p� O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a W O O O C pp O O O G O r- O C C C C G C G O C O O O O C S C C O G O O O G C O C O Coco C O d A A A !r A A CO O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M A 1�� A A A A M M U% Ln In 1n 1n to 1n N1 M 64N LM 1n 1n to In 1n v11n 1n .n 1n 1n 1n to to N4 uY 1n 1n to to u9 6 N N d d d d d d d din Y1 In 1n Y1 M 1n 1f1 1n N'+ u't 1n 1n M 1n N v1 M 11'. 1n In N N 1n Nn to V1 H1 1n W% Y1 In to Y1 . i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^ 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r r r N N W N H i N No ON O O - - - - - - - - ft( -4 - - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - m N N N � N N O O O O O N N O O O N N O O O N N O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O N O A P P P A A P P P A A P Co. P IN► N P P A P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N PPA P ----------------- ------ N M O O N 1n A Nin U1 In N P� IA In 9AP- N M IA A N M &RLM M M V1 V1 Y1 IA Y1 W% V1 U9 V1 IA IA NIA in In N M M N M M N IA �? N N N V V N N N V V N N N V V N N V N N N N N N_ _N N_ N_ _N N_ N N_ _N N N N N N N N N N N V N N V N --0' — Pp.--U—NZ'm--0'-- — —----------p.--p. IA in 11'1 N M 1n In N NIA Y1 11'1 N NMN NIA U1 Y'1 Y'I N If1 N Y1 Y1 fA N In IA IA V1 N N {A 11'1 In Y1 In Y1 -Y'1 N U1 Y1 N 11'1 fD IO O O a0 CO ID CO t0 CO W CO CO aOD a0 a0 c0 W I>D � a0 a0 a0 a0 CO CO CD � OD � CD e0 e0 a0 a0 CO � a0 � � c0 a0 t7D aD a0 CD CO c0 V VOOVVV V V VV N N MANN N N N m N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N- N N N N N M M on N N M in M N N on M M N N M M N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N M M N M ID CO O O � � � W CO W 000 Q1 m COO COD CO � COO � CO 00 e0 la t0 CmD 00 a0 a0 CO a0 a0 i0 QO a0 a0 a0 CD i0 00 CO CO �.� CmD W OD a0 00 00 a0 4 VOO't VV V V V V V V VV VV V V V V VVVVVVVVVVVVVV.fVV V 4 V V VVVV.TVV.! N N N N" N N N NN N N tV N NN N m tV N N N N N N N N N N N N.N N N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N M' M M 1V N M M M New M M M m N M M N M M M M M M M M M M M M Mtn MM M M M M M M M M N r" M. N M W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W sxxxxzzsz:szszszzssaszazxssszxszzzzxzsaxzszzzzzzzZ J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J aC at aCM aCLLaC CIC CC aC W CLfJ aC K aC G' CIC of LW a aC a K CIC aC aC WW aC M CIC aC W M aC 1 L= aL YOC aC OG aC aL fY aL aCW am CIL W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m co m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m en to S S Z== S S S S S S S S Z S S Z Z S Z S S S S S S Z S S S S S S Z Z Z= S S S S i S Z Z S S S H1-rr��rr��r��.►.�-r��►-i.1=1-�f-�r�r�rr F1��►.�-.1-��-.moi. �f-��.� 00000c0000�Q00000cococooecc0000cc0000000000000c000 zzzzzzzxzz sxszzzxxzzx zzzzzxzzzxzxaxzzss ssxzx »»»»»> »»»»»>zS»»»»»»»»» »»> J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J. d J J J J J. J J J. J J J J J J J J J. J J NNNN N N VINH N VIN0 N 0000 NN NNNNNN00 NNNfRN C/fN Vl 000000Qo 0 0000oob"000000000000000 d Ll N M V V1 — N M V 1f1 — M V V1 — M V M1 — V V5 — M VIA —MVM — M V In MVM V V N V N V 0O0000O0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 t► f. A f� ID t0 aD to 00 0� P 50� O O O O O O O O O O OO O O —.— — — — — T i O O O$ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Ln W% M M M Y1 Y1 NUN IA Y1 Y1 U1 IA M M H1 N to to M U9 1A N Y'1 Y1 N V1 Y1 lA Y1 N N U'1 In In M N M M N N M N M N 1A N M M IA V1 M Y'1 IA -Y'1 1A V1 Y1 M M M MIA N N II'1 In {A Y'1 V1 In IA V1 IA Y1 Y1 Y1 Y1 Y1 If1 IA M N M N N M M M N M N NN h 1A IA V1 IA V1 Y► V1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N S S. p. p. p. p. CONp P P P P m r _N N N N _N _N N N N N N _N N N N N O U1 U1 U1 U% U1 61 h U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 O N OmSCDSSSSCOCDSSSSSCDa N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N M f10 e0 00 eD W cD e0 e0 �O c0 a0 CD S SCD S P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N M W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W i Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J KK CCK K K K K K K K K K KK W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W co go cc go go cc Z z z z z0 cis clk coo S S S Z S S S Z S=% 1- r- � " r- r 8- 1- ►. r- •- r- ►. r- ►- r- J-222221ml»-20 ��J��11111yJytJJtftfftJ��11111t—yA j VJy►yJytJI��tyi—A yi yii-i -t�i► .r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 0 0 0 0 0 001.1 N N N N N N N N M M M M M M r r r r r r r r r r r r r S S S S S r O O O O O O O O O O O t. MM M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O U1 U1 IA V1 U1 U7 N U1 U1 U1 N U1 N V1 U1 = Uin 1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16,1996 D. PROJECT 664, WESCOTT SQUARE FINAL ASSMT HEARING ACTION FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: To close the public hearing and approve/amend the final assessment roll for Project 664 (Wescott Square - Street Reconstruction) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: On March 19, 1996, the City Council received the final assessment roll for the above -referenced project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on April 16. On April 1, an informational neighborhood meeting was held to present the final assessment amounts to the affected/interested property owners. Of the 146 parcels proposed to be assessed, two property owners attended. Minutes from that meeting are enclosed. Due to a successful grant application from Community Development Block Grant funds, the final assessment rates were substantially below the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on April 18, 1995. ISSUES: At the time of the public hearing, the Council determined that Lots 5-9, Block 2, of Wescott Square, should be deleted from the preliminary assessment roll due to the fact that their direct driveway access connected to Trails End Road, which was not part of this project. The final assessment roll inadvertently continued to include these properties for proposed final assessments. Five lots @ $175.17 per lot = $875.85. Two options are available for Council consideration: 1. Delete these parcels from the assessment roll and have the City's participation increased by a like amount. 2. Respread this amount over the remaining assessable parcels (146). This would require a renotification and new public hearing to increase the proposed assessments beyond what has been legally advertised for this public hearing. The Public Works and Finance Departments recommend that the Council give consideration to Option #1 in modifying the final assessment roll. ATTACHMENTS: • Informational neighborhood meeting minutes, pages % through. • Final assessment roll, pages,/B3 through f�. rA xk i3 'c. } —city of eagan TO: FILE FROM: MIKE FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: APRIL 8, 1996 SUBJECT: CITY PROJECT NO 664, WESCOTT SO ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMENT INFORMATIONAL MEETING MEMO On Monday, April 1, 1996, at 6:00 p.m. in the Eagan City Council Chambers, representatives of City staff hosted an informational meeting regarding the final assessment amount for the Wescott Square Addition. The informational meeting was attended by the following property owners: 1. Darlene Ninteman 3463 Trails End Road 2. Mary & Robert M. Gangs 849 Wescott Square The property owners at 849 Wescott Square had two concerns. The first concern was that the notification that was sent to them listed Andrew Gangl as the property owner, not Robert M. & Mary. Staff responded saying that they would research the address information used to send the notifications. The second concern of the Gangl's was the apparent water that was collecting at the intersection of Yankee Doodle/Ivy Lane/Mike Collins Drive. Staff responded stating that a certain amount of water would collect at the intersection because the final wear course had not yet been placed on Yankee Doodle Road. The property owner at 3463 Trails End Road expressed concern with paying for an assessment for Ivy Lane when their driveway access is to Trails End Road. The property owner went on to state that in the approval process for the Wescott Square improvement, the City Council had deleted their property from the pending assessment roll. Staff responded in stating they would research the record and revise the assessment roll as necessary. Please refer to the attached correspondence regarding this issue. The meeting adjourned at approximately 6:30 p.m. Assistant City Engineer MPFyj 1490 2^0 PROPERTY OWNERS ATTENDING INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS 140DW Y 140.00• - 1RljH ADD. 10e.00• 7= �� 9• hl Ih, pI � ••� ! 013-01 raw WESCOTT SQUARE 1 . 120., s o0 1V-00' 70.00• TRAILS END RD. W%0T A 4 wESCOTT GARpEry FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NUMBER: 664 ASSESSMENT HEARING DATE: April 16. 1996 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Wescott Hills Street Reconstruction PUBLIC HEARING DATE: April 18, 1995 IMPROVEMENT INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report SANITARY FINAL F.R. SEWE RATES RATES O Think 0IAt Benefit/Tnmk WATER a Trunk I-ILaterals Service Lat. Benefit/Trunk- WAC SERVICES DWater A San. Sewer STORM FINAL SEWER RATES Tnmk Eluarals LaL Benefit/Trunk STREETS Gravel Base $ 50.874.ot Unit $101.74/Lot Unit ®surfacing S ] 75.17/Lot Unit Res. Equiv. Multi Equiv. C/I Equiv. Trail STREET LIGHTS Installation F.R. RATES $213.00/Lot Unit S426.00/Lot Unit $298.00/Lot Unit Energy Charge CONTRACT # OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITy NO. PARCELS TERMS RATE ASSESSED FINANCED $64,234 F.R. $56,931 F.R. 95-05 _ 1465l Yews 7.0% $18.776.77 (1) 548.513.03 COMMENTS: (11 The assessable amount is reduced by the proceeds of a $30.000.00 Communi1y Development Block Grant ASSESSMEN73%.664w*d.fah D — city of eagan TO: DEANNA KIVI, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CLERK FROM: GERALD R. WOBSCHALL DATE: MARCH 13,1996 SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT NO. 664 - WESCOTT HILLS STREET RECONSTRUCTION MEMO The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing on April 18, 1995 ordered Project 664. According to the feasibility report the following improvements were to be constructed and/or assessed. The improvements are: sanitary sewer upgrades, curb and gutter replacement and street reconstruction. Construction was completed under Contract 95-05. Final payment has not been made to the contractor at this time. The assessment hearing is scheduled for April 16, 1996. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll. 1. PROJECT COST 1,03 Construction Other Improvement Improvement Costs Costs Costs Street Reconstruction - $33,971.30 $15,314.30 $49,285.60 Wescott Square Street Reconstruction - 10,947.07 4,934.95 15,882.02 Ivy Lane Curb and Gutter 16,551.00 7,461.21 24,012.21 Sanitary Sewer 3,140.00 1,415.52 4,555-52 Street Lights 2,450.00 1,104.45 3,554.45 TOTAL $67x059.37 $30,230.43 $97,289.80 1,03 II. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment roll. B. UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Street Reconstruction The street reconstruction improvement excluding the curb and gutter repair was constructed at a cost of $44,918.37. Other costs in the amount of $20,249.25 were added to the construction cost which results in an improvement cost of $65,167.62. a. According to the feasibility report, the assessment rate was to be determined in the following manner. The properties lying east of Ivy Lane were to be assessed for 75% of one half the cost of reconstructing Ivy Lane. The City policy is to participate a minimum of 25% in street reconstruction costs. The assessable portion then equals 100% - 25% = 75% of the reconstruction cost, and the assessment rate is computed in the following manner: Improvement Cost Factor Assessable Cost $15,882.02 X's (.5 x .75) $59955.76 Assessable Cost Assessable Units Assessable Rate $5,955.76 34 LOT UNITS $175.17/Lot unit b. According -to the feasibility report the properties west of Ivy Lane and abutting Wescott Square are to be assessed for 75% of 50% of the cost to reconstruct Ivy Lane and 75% of the cost to reconstruct Wescott Square. The City policy is to participate a minimum of 25% in street reconstruction costs. The assessable portion then equals 1001% - 25% = 75% of the construction cost. The reconstruction cost of Wescott Square was determined at $33,971.30. Other costs in the amount of $15,314.30 were allocated resulting in an improvement cost of $49,285.60. The City received a Community Development Block Grant in the amount of $30,000.08 to offset the cost of this improvement. According to the feasibility report, the properties that take direct driveway access to either Ivy Lane or Wescott Square will be assessed at twice the rate of those parcels that do not take direct driveway access to. those streets. There are 94 units that take direct driveway access and 80 units that do not have direct driveway access. The assessable units was determined in the following manner. Weighted Description Units Weight Costs Direct Driveway Access 80 1 80 Indirect Driveway Access 94 .5 47 Assessable Units 127 The assessment rate was determined in the following manner. Improvement Cost $49,285.60 X's $15,882.02 X's Assessable Cost CDBG Proceeds Amount Assessable AMOUNT ASSESSABLE $12,919.96 Factor (.75) (.5 x.75) ASSESSABLE UNITS 127 Lot Equiv. The assessment rate used is determined to be: Weighting Lot Equiv. Rate Direct Driveway Access Indirect Driveway Access Assessable Cost $36,964.20 $5,955.76 $42,919.96 ($30,000-00) $12,919.96 ASSESSMENT RATE $101.74/1-ot Equiv. Assessment Rate 1 x $101.74 $101.74 .5 x $101.74 $50.87 2. Concrete Curb and Gutter Replacement concrete curb and gutter was installed at a construction cost in the amount of $16,551.00. Other costs in the amount of $7,461.21 were allocated resulting in an improvement cost of $24,012.21. This improvement will be financed by the City's Major Street Fund. 3. Sanitary Sewer improvements The sanitary sewer improvements consisted of replacement of manhole castings, the removal of cones and installation of barrel sections at a construction cost of $3,140.00. Other costs in the amount of $1,415.52 were added which results in an improvement cost of $4,555.52. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be financed by the Sanitary Sewer Division of the City's Utility Fund. 105- 4. Streetlights There were 2 streetlights relocated, and 1 other streetlight upgraded at a construction cost of $2,450.00. Other costs in the amount of $1,104.45 resulting in an improvement cost of $3,554.45. This improvement is to be financed by the City's Major Street Fund. C. ASSESSMENT SPREAD The special assessments are spread to the abutting and adjacent parcels. D. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments for this project are to be spread for a term of 15 years at an annual Interest rate of 7.0% on the unpaid balance. 111. CITY REVENUES/RESPONSIBILITIES Improvement City's Improvement Cost Assessment CDBG Responsibility Street Reconstruction Curb and Gutter Sanitary Sewer Street Light $65,167.62 24,012.21 4,555.32 3,554.45 $18,776.77 • •e • •• $30,000.00 $16,390.85 0.00 24,012.21 0.00 4,555.52 0.00 0.00 $3,554.45 TOTAL $97,289.80 $18,776.77 $30,000.00 $48,513.03 cmxm�The following funds will provide financing for the listed improvements. Major Street Fund $43,957.51 Sanitary Sewer Division of the Utility Fund $4,555.52 TOTAL $48,513.03 Gerald R. Wobschall Reviewed: Public Works Department Dated: Reviewed: O -D % %> AM L&4 i ce Department NA Dated: + cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works E.J. VanOverbeke, Director of Finance/City Clerk Jim Sheldon, City Attorney Tom Pepper, Assistant Finance Director /tO u SNI1103 3NIIN a 0 E3 Z� /o i i�jnoo O W F •i rr r Li U 0 o N::DN V) �— W F- •'' 0 .J z U O V) 0i U W 0 ri 0 J / F— c0 W W Co LAJ W Y � U Z ca �f-- V / LLJ O /o i i�jnoo O W F z O U N::DN /L.L V J z O U W F— c0 W Co W U �f-- V / LLJ O ry^^ LiJ j D V) w J ao F— Zs�► Dor- ~ v� O L LI Muun U U) Lv ❑ V Q J O 4r r =US y N N t O W i L A N M M M W1 a 9;e N N N N N O O O O O O M M M M N M M M M M M M M M M M M N M M W M M M M M M M M N N N N V1 V1 V1 V1 IA M M M M M A V � �- J m u % N N mm mew N" V V V V 49 49 49 49 49� � � � O� N N N N_ NN N N N N N N N N N N N 49 N N m C i 10 O O O O O O O O N N N N ��}} �t N N N N N �VA1 .O .O .O .p .O .0 .0 .O .0 m .O N .0 N .O .p�} m ,0 t �= x-1+1 M P, In .p .O .p .OA��-�� e-e-a-.-�,0 r OC << N v v v v v v v v C ---- z r- > IL i V y N��O �C �O �O N N N N IV O0O00111M M MMIA M M M M M MMMMM_M_MNMM NNNN V1 V1 V1 V1 V\ M M M _M M_ .O � � � � .O — — — — — — � r �•. V1 � � .r. r M N N N N ��111 N �Ay1 N v a d d m m m O O N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N i M 6 A A AA I�AAA W M 0. N a. -+W N CC i W W A A A A A A A A d V V V 49 0 0 0 0 0 O pp pp pp N A A A t.00 A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 A A 17 -AAAA dV d V VA A1�I�I�N 9O9 40 O 49049 O 49494949 Od 4949 r M y1y� y1y�y�y1y1 �� MM M M M pppp pppp 0 00 V1 O 00 O M 00 O O 00 00 O O O O M O O 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 V1 V1 V1 VI O N V1 V1 V1 V1 V1 N V1 111 V1 H1 V1 O V1 V1 W t V1 - - - - .- e-- - - - - - fV N N N NIA V1 M V1 V1 M N 4y $o of r IL N � A A A A A A A A d d d V 0 0 0 040 O O O O O N A A A A CD A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 A A . J N V1��r-r-��.-AAAA dV dddAAA A -A N49OO49d049O4949494949494949Od4949 t 11 JS 11 V1 y{A,1�AAV�A VV11ycy,y�MMMMM0mO sV7000OmO00O0000O0OOMOO 1< 0 NAA A---- A O O O O O O O O O O O O in O O N V1 V1 V1 O V1 V1 V1 V1 V1 V1 61 V1 V1 V1 V1 V1 O V1 V1 I rca C V1��.��NNNNNIAMMMVtM N Iy O 2 11 . r .+ 11 O. 11 r N N . W 2 as 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z i 2 2 i i i i Z 2 2 i Z = NNNAINNNIV NNNNNNNNNNAiNN O D D O O O D O D D D D D O O D D D O O D W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W N N_ H H NN N N NN_ N N _N N N D D D O 2 S S 2 = S 2 2 s S > > > > > > >>:1015:5555:5555 > > > > > > i C OC G' r r r r r r r r r r W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W _ MMMMddddddddddCCK CIC CC mm ococacmaaac4rC4coc04aaac D N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J -I J J J-4 ,,j N NNVlNVlNNN J_J J__J JJ_JJJJJJ_J_J_J__J _J J_ JJ__JJJ Jw_J JJ J_JJ__J JJJ tYt t Yt Y Y S YS Y Y Y Y S S 2 2 x s S 2 S 2 S S x 2 x S S 2 S 2 S 2 SSSS s S S S S S S S x 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0� ►- r r r r r r r r r r r ►- r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r rrrrcrrprcrGrGrrprrrrrrrrrprrprrrrGrGr�rGrrrrr testti<isi`uuvc�suuc�u8uusUBUQcO, uuuuc�i8uuuc�uuuuuu83 V C7 C7a a339 N NyNl yN yN WN N N U3o{N N NNyN W Vf NNNNNNNN VINNNNNNN VENN C, i W ii�!!i iLs `}�' 33'3'3 Ys'�s's'3'�"5i' Y'3'41 I{I {"= 6L' ""4' W W W W W W W W W IV 3 S 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OOOOOpp.pp 49Cp0000 O__OOOO�O} OOOOO�NM.T O�NMd �NMd �.NMd V1� N 09 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 O OO O O O p O..pp A CD N NN N N NN M M.t d �y �} M G O i r 0 1 -. . I . WSO0Op OppOppOOOO��-.---r-r.-- .-- — —.--�— —.- W.O�O�O�O.O�O.0�0.0OOO pp00OOO'aspso --------- =.------.----- D d V V V d. V d V V �O .O .O .O �O % .O .O �O �O �O .O �O .O �O 10 �O �O �O .O .O .O �O 10 10 .O �O 10 10 10 10 �O 10 .O N NN N fV N N fN N Mi M M M M M M M M M M M M M /Me� M M M M MM MM M M M M M M M M M M M d NNNNNNNNN4949 C0494949494949�C0494949494049494949494949494949494949494949494949 0 4:666 0 660 0 0 47 O O O O O _ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /O s MMMMMMMmmMg -O.OJJ�}�} M�MNIMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM r 1 O O N N N N 0 0 0 0 .- -:7 771:7 717 - 7 0 — 1 1: r - N N N N N N N N N N h p N. Q PQ �} v J J h P hp, h LV N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N M N N N N � � � � � N N N N N N N P P N P �O •O �O 'O �O �O �O �O 'O 'O 'OD 'O �O �O •O �O %0 �O MM MM NN c�i fV �-r--- —ems---------� %0 r•'cr.D'0� �� O W S APPhhhhhhh.p.0.p �YJJ-tPPPPChOaADahO� ChOahDahOCh0ah0oA0aA0ehDCA00A0OPOmNhCAD��ahO� aAOahOCADW OPOChOChO aDaOmCOmaDaOCOQOt00•vPO�hPPA 000 C" 000051% a S 9 •�� 0— 91p 980000000000000000 In in in 0000000 N N Vol V1 V1 V1 V1 Y1 V1 V1 O -t O O O O O C O CS O 1f� M1 �l'1 �A U1 Y1 �A If1 Ifs �A Y1 Y1 V1 If1 YY Y1 V1 If\ YS �f1 Y1 IA Y1 V1 IR Y1 Y1 •H Y1 JVJJvvJ 19mah0ah9aA0ahDah0aP0ah0ah00�aP9tiA.PPO.PahD�aAOahOmaqaag9C9OaagOih0ah09maA0aPDQPCaDCP0iiIliC9D9Qa CC9Qh19C9 Oa700000000.00.-00.O.O.O.p00000000000000000000000000000 0 c c N 2 C V1 0 0 N O 6 O O O O O O O O O •n Ln 2 An W% LM Ln U1 N An in uY 1n �A �n &n in V7 V1 A 6n Ln �n Ln V% In to V1 Y% N N N N N Cu N Cm N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M +1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M21 M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O p O 0 0 0 0 p O 0 0 p p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O 0 0 00 0 p O p O 0 0 0 0 p p 0 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 444 FA W V/LA 22LAN4 /A N VINNNNNNNNNNHN NN VlNN VlNV1NNNN VlNNNNNNNNNN W W W W D-:0 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W OG OL S OL OL S OC OC OC OC OC OG OC OL S OC OC OL OL OC OL OL OL K OC OC OL OC OC OC S OL OC S OL OC OC OL OC OL OL OL OL OL aC OL OC ala OL OC W N N N N N N V l V1 V! N W J J H- a J J J J N N N N N V! V l h N V l h N N N N N N N V l N N N V l- j J j J J J N Jj N N H N H N V! J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J .J J J J J J J S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSSS S S S S S S S S S SSSS S S S S SSSS S S SSS S S S S S S S �.rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr-rrrrrrrrrrrr ♦-rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 888888888888888888888888$8888888888888888888888888 0888MOM N�N�yy �N�yy {N{yy {N{yy yNy�� {Nyy1 y{Ny,� N yNI �Vy/ �Vy! yV,l� yy� �yN/ �Ny �Vy/ {Hy {N�ui1 {{Nyy L�/11 yN,/ �Vy! {Ny �Ny {Ny N {UyNy,,��{N{y,� {N{yy yNy�� yNy�! yNy11 {N{YY CN�VV N yN1yJ yN� yNW� N 3 3' 3 3' N^ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3^ 3^^ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7^^ 3 3 3 3 3^ 3 w^ 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � N J� OOOCCCD � POS-NNNNMJVI .O�� NNNNMMMM.} J V1 Ln V1 Ln �p .p �p PP!P;! 0000 • GOA ��.-r ��OOOOOO OO O OO OO 9? 1? C? OOOOO --------- N N N N N N N N— N N N N N N G N N N N N N N N N N N N • ��p��-��-e-��.'p-.�p.�p.�p ��p .gyp �-��-��r-�� •O �O M d A A A A A A � �O •O �O �O �O •D �O •O M .O �O M M M M �i �O •O �p •O .p �O �O �O �O �O �O �O �O '�O O M M MMM M MMMMMMMM M M e6 M MMM MMMMMM N� M en Mf S 1007 �aOOOOa0a0a0Oa0OOaDmOaDOO aOOm www Oa0Oa0 aOMCM0 0LOO eDOD apq�apap��aMp A O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O _O O_ 6 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6.:6 6 0 6 6 0 0 /01 M n nn nn n—nn nnn r' N NN If1 U100 00 0 0 0 0000 00 0 0100 0 rcy o v lo -a ry N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d d d 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ,O `C`C`O`O �O �O �O 1010 +O �C �O �O �ONNN NNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN --�MMM---ems------- -----w--- r MMMNM7+:M MMMMMM_M M7MMMtRMMMMM�O �O+O NIV IDOCD CO CO C0O000OCDO000OOOOO _ M��'��`�"�� N��NNNU1UtiPPPPPPPP PPPPPPpp..PPPPPP = N9N N 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d d d 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Uf W H Ul O W AAAt70AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAdddOODAf►AAAfANNNNNAAAAAAAAAA m OOOVOOOOOOd0OOOO000000000OAAAVd��1�y��y��yr��yy��y��yy��y��t{l��1U��yy��yU��yU��y��r.y�� UO1 UO1N OUO1 UO1N N1OR UO1 U0►UO1N UO1 UO1 ff�UO1 UO1 u0%In CD A W% Ln UCD CD m O10000Oh1� fel. 1eAAfe PAAI►1eAicAAA )Cie le N NN--------------------- NONONiNAAA.AAAAAANNNNNAdddtl:A: A O0O9 O O O O O O O O O O O OOA�� O O O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M N �n 1n u1 U%M O U1 U% Ln U1 I^1,M u1N U1 M U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 V1 W% Ln f. !� A N f��NN�.�.��------------- CCCCCOOc�O0000[OOLYYYaoeGoeGoeGOCOOC�OOC�KOOCOOc0000OCGoeCOOL M M1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M to O O O O O O O O O O O W O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HNNNNNIWANNNNHNNNLU NNNCWA iW/JNN0 NNNNNN W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Z. W W W W W W W OC a C GC W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W UINMH J j J U! NN UJH N-NMNNNd1 W NNVJNl UIUI GCC OCY OLY YGC GCC COC OCK 0.'GCK GC OC OC GC J J J J J J J J J J J J J . J J . J J J J J ".i J ".i J J J! !!!! !!!!!! !!!!!!!!! J_ J _J J_ _J J_ J J_ J J _J _J J J_ J_ J J C 7 l t* fA J C C�� C(A I W C C C SSSSS SSSS=SSS=SSS SSSSSS SSSS SSNNNNN NNN UI NN HN UINNNI// rrr�rr�rrrrrrrrrrrrr�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr0.4 0... rrrr rpercrrC�crrrrrrrl-rrrrcrrrrr�rrcrrrrrrrprrrrcrrrrrrprrcerrrrrr uuuuuLO'i uuuul8auuu uuuuuuuuls" 18" uuuu1ot8uu8uuuuuuuu NUfN UfNN VlNNNUl H1ANN VlN tANNU/ V/NfANNNNN VJNNNNNh Vl 41NNNVIN VJ VfNNNNN N o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 00" 0 0 0 0 0 N M d N M d N M d O O O O O O _O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0000000 U1:0 A O P 00=10,40=99210008 IC -11 M 0 A P O—N M d u14 N N N N N N N N N— N N N N N— N— N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L .o .o .o .o �o'4,0 a�oAg'O•C'e,0,014101o•o-9—AZ—;2pr.'�.'K'%'%'%'�.'�.'K'�.'�.'�.'K'�.'�.'�'�.'�.'K' A ."ae"da►OGooaMoa"W'om"�o"dwaMoo"'oaMoet'+o mm a'^o oeaaMo"a3'aammeoao 000e+��aMo�a�o'�mme"de�+oa3�aMommaMomer'+o�"113aMo t► o0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 //D O ICOI N N N A NNFIR � � W W C OG F N H H 8V N W3N N O O A r r .I.MM MMO O i 4 N r Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 Eagan City Council Meeting BUENOS A. AMENDMENT, CITY CODE SECTION 6.37 REGARDING THE MAXIM M NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE HAULING LICENSES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny an ordinance amending Eagan City Code Chapter 6 entitled "Other Business Regulation and Licensing" by amending Section 6.37 regarding refuse hauling licenses; and by adopting by reference Eagan City Code Chapter 1 and Section 6.99 as presented. FACTS: At the direction of the City Council, the Solid Waste Abatement Commission engaged in an extensive study of the City's waste hauling system and presented a report to the City Council at the workshop meeting in January. At that time, the Council concurred with the Commission recommendation and directed staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to implement a phased reduction of the residential refuse hauling licenses to begin to limit the number of refuse and recycling trucks operating within individual neighborhoods. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff memorandum on page • Ordinance amendment on pages A through //Ca TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: APRIL 5, 1996 MEMO SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF CITY CODE SECTION 6.37 CONCERNING THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL REFUSE HAULERS At the recommendation of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission, the Eagan City Council directed the preparation of an amendment of the City Code to cap the number of residential refuse haulers and to reduce them by attrition from the current number of eleven to a maximum of five. Upon review of the issue, the City Attorney's office is recommending that this be accomplished in a step -wise fashion by setting the cap at one less than the number of licenses outstanding at any given time. Each time a license is terminated by a business dosing or change in ownership, the Council can modify the ordinance to reduce the cap until the target of five is achieved. If the Council wishes to reissue the license in the case of an outside firm purchasing an existing licensed hauler, the cap would not be changed. Under the proposed ordinance, attrition would occur primarily by the consolidation of current licensed haulers. Each time an existing licensee purchases another existing licensee, one of the licenses would be terminated and the combined business would operate under a single license. Because of this approach to the reduction issue, it will be essential for our licensing and recycling personnel to offer the Council a code amendment any time a change in ownership occurs. The reason the Commission is recommending this approach is that consolidation of the industry as a whole has not translated into fewer haulers in Eagan neighborhoods. As some haulers have gone out of business in the last ten years, larger haulers from other parts of the metro area or country have entered the Eagan market. Without a cap and reduction ordinance, this pattern is likely to continue as the national refuse business has become more competitive and haulers expand their markets to protect their businesses. A copy of the proposed ordinance is attached. If you have questions, please let me know. _% to the Citv Administrator 113 ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER SIX ENTITLED "OTHER BUSINESS REGULATION & LICENSING' BY AMENDING SECTION 6.37 REGARDING REFUSE HAULING LICENSES; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 6.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter Six is hereby amended by changing Section 6.37, Subd. 1(F) and (G), to read as follows: F. "Residential Dwelling Haulin " means -Rarbage, refuse and recycli . hauling services in which the hauler snecificallv services an individual residential dwellinunit for the pickup of the garbage refuse or recyclable of that individual residential dwelling unit at that specific unit, regardless of whether it is a sin e -f gplily dwelhg or a dwellm unit within a multi le dwelling unit structure. G. Multiple Residential Dwelling" "Commercial/Multiple Dwelling Hauling" means .... J, b,,: ding used f e i enfia, pwpes of Ifiefe one dwefling anit and ag dweRing units am sewed by the same fg—RA-aage Amid feeyeling garbage. refuse or recycling mauling services provided to gpy commercial establishment or py Multiple dweft units of which all residents commingle their garbbA a and refuse in a dumpster or other similar container for shared icku service by the hauler or commingle their regyclables in a dum sten or other similar container for shared pickup service by the hauler. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter Six is hereby amended by changing Section 6.37, Subd. 4(C), to read as follows: C. The Council, in the interest in maintaining healthful and sanitary conditions in the City, hereby reserves the right to specify and assign certain areas to all licensees, and to limit the number of licenses issued. The Council shall issue no more than ten (IQ) residential dwelling; hauling licenses. No license shall be transferable between persons or entities An, change in individual or corporate ownership or substitution in partners shall constitute a transfer and shall automatically terminate the license. /iy Section 3. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation"' and Section 6.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: By: E. J. VanOverbeke Its: Clerk Date Ordinance Adopted: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: IX -5 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 - Eagan City Council Meeting ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED To approve the Final Planned Development to allow a 7,700 sq. ft. Greenmill restaurant on Lot 2, Block 1, Rahncliff 4th Addition. FACTS On February 21, 1995, the City Council approved an amendment to the Rahncliff Addition Preliminary Planned Development to allow a Class I restaurant on Lot 2, Block 1, Rahncliff 4th Addition in association with the expansion of Holiday Inn Express. The applicant has submitted plans that are in conformance with the preliminary plans approved by Council and therefore. they are requesting Final Planned Development approval. The Planned Development Amendment to allow a Greenmill restaurant with liquor will be heard at the April 23, 1996 APC meeting and the May 7, 1996 City Council meeting. BACKGROUND/ ATTACHMENTS: (2) PD Agreement / / 1 Site plan Building Elevations a e Landscaping plan Lighting plan 116 FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LOT 2, BLOCK 1, RAHNCLIFF 4TH ADDITION THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of 1996, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City") and Thomas Torgerson (hereinafter the "Applicant"). WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eagan is the official governing body of the City of Eagan; and WHEREAS, the City and the original Owner and Developer entered into a Preliminary Planned Development Agreement for Rahncliff 2nd Addition (hereinafter the "Agreement") on the 6th day of September 1988 for a term of five (5) years; and WHEREAS, the Agreement runs with the land until terminated and is binding upon the successor and assigns of the original owner and developer; and WHEREAS, Thomas Torgeson is the successor in interest of Lot 2, Block 1, Rahncliff 4th Addition; and WHEREAS, the Agreement provides for amendments to said Agreement upon application by the Applicant and approval of the City pursuant to Eagan City Code; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied for an amendment to Exhibit C of the Agreement to allow a restaurant on Lot 2, Block 1, Rahncliff 4th Addition; and WHEREAS, the Advisory Planning Commission of the City of Eagan did hold a public hearing on January 24, 1995, and did recommend approval of an amendment to the Agreement on that date; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eagan did review the amendment to the Agreement on February 21, 1995, and did concur with the recommendation of the Advisory Planning Commission to approve an amendment to the Agreement; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed to and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. This agreement applies solely to Lot 2, Block 1, Rahncliff 4th Addition. 2. The Agreement shall be further amended to revise Exhibit C of the Rahncliff 2nd Addition Planned Development Agreement as amended, to allow a restaurant on Lot 2, Block 1, Rahncliff 4th Addition. 3. The Agreement shall be amended to include specific conditions to the development as set forth herein (Exhibit A). All other requirements of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as fully set forth in the Agreement. 4. The applicant shall comply with the plans, Labeled B through E, attached hereto: Final Site Plan, Final Building Elevation/Sign Plan, Final Planting Plan, and Final Lighting Plan which are made part of this agreement (full size plans are on file with the City of Eagan Community Development Department). 5. This Amendment shall run with the land until terminated and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the Applicant. 6. This Agreement shall become part of the Agreement, fully binding upon the parties, as if fully set forth in the agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and year first above written. (Seal) (Seal) CITY OF EAGAN A- Minnesota Municipal Corporation BY: BY: BY: DATE: //S Thomas Egan Its Mayor E.J. VanOverbeke Its Clerk Thomas Torgeson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Mike Ridley Senior Planner APPROVED AS TO FORM: Eagan City Attorney STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) On this day of 1996 before me a Notary Public within and for said County personally appeared THOMAS EGAN and E.J. VANOVERBEKE to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed in behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) Notary Public On this day of 1996 before me a Notary Public within and for said County personally appeared Thomas Torgeson to me personally known, who, acknowledged said instrument to be his free act and deed. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Community Development City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 56122 (612) 681-4600 Department //9 Notary Public EXHIBIT A 1. A 7,700 SF Greenmill restaurant is approved to be developed on Lot 1, Block 2, Rahn Cliff 4th Addition. 2. The site design shall be consistent with the proposed Site Plan dated February 21, 1995, with the latest revision date of March 29, 1996. 3. Landscaping shall be provided as shown on Planting Plan dated March 26, 1996. 4. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view. 5. The property owner must file declarations that all cross parking easements will always remain. 6. The following exhibits are necessary for the Final Planned Development Agreement: • Final Site Plan " Final Building Elevation/Sign Plan * Final Planting Plan * Final Lighting Plan /.Q 6 E781 z A W I— im 'r - LU LLI < 23 LU C7) cc CD LLI C" .. C% � �� IL \� � } \ E781 z A W I— im 'r - LU LLI < 23 LU .•`§ Cf) \ cc CD LLI 2\ .. }k � �� IL A.,s;oov ri SO lq_ }ƒ |§ � }k � �� IL DZI. A I J ul zj Lu 1 -WE UJ D. LU X q i LU Ula W I LAJ Lu cr UJ w L -U if $- ic u or LU m x W LU I CA ! : ! i ei11 „a, t k$ yW w �� gad Is w /ay Agenda Information Memo April 16,1996 Q AMENDMENT, CITY CODE SECTION 3.2 (HYDRANT USAGE) ACTION FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: To approve the amendment to City Code Section 3.2, Subd. 8, (Permitting Water Hydrant Usage), authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents, and order publication in the legal newspaper. FACTS: • Effective January 1, 1983, the current City Code precludes anyone other than the Fire Department or City personnel from operating any fire hydrant. • Over the years, the City has been contacted by builders, developers, contractors, and/or business owners requesting permission to connect to a City fire hydrant for a temporary supply of water for building construction, dust control, turf irrigation/fertilization, etc. • Consideration of amending the current Ordinance to allow private use of fire hydrants through a permit process was presented to the City Council at a Workshop Session held on February 6, 1996. As a result of that Session, the Council directed staff to proceed with a proposed Ordinance amendment. • This Ordinance amendment proposal has been prepared by the City Attorney's Office and circulated through all City departments. There have been no concerns raised regarding the proposed Ordinance amendment as presented. ATTACHMENTS: • Proposed Ordinance amendment, pages L& through has ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER THREE ENTITLED "MUNICIPAL & PUBLIC UTILITIES - RULES & REGULATIONS, RATES, CHARGES & COLLECTIONS" BY AMENDING SECTION 3.20, SUBDIVISION 8, REGARDING PERMITTED WATER HYDRANT USE; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 3.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Eagan City Code Chapter Three is hereby amended by changing Section 3.20, Subd. 8, to read as follows: Subd. 8. Water Hydrant Use. a. Opening Hydrants. It is unlawful for any person, other than members of the Fire Department or other person duly authorized by the City; in pursuance of lawful purpose, to open any fire hydrant or attempt to draw water from the same or in any manner interfere therewith. without first obtaining a_ ermit therefor from the _City. It is also unlawful for any person so authorized to deliver or suffer to be delivered to any other person any hydrant key or wrench, except for the purposes strictly pertaining to their lawful use. A se crate ermit shall be required. in addition to all re uired fees and de osits. for each se arate water hvdrant to be used. b. Permit Application and Fee. An application for a permit hereunder shall be filed with the Citv Clerk upon an application form furnished by the City. The application shall include, but not be limited to, the name and address of the applicant and the person signing the application. the location of theVroposed water hydrant to be used and the reason for the applicant's connection to or use of the water hydrant. The fee for a permit hereunder shall be established by the Council. by resolution from time to time. C. Conditions of Issuance of ,Permit. No permit shall be issued unless the following conditions are met: 1. The connection and _ use of the public water hydrant is solely for temporary water supply where a public water connection is not otherwise available for building constructiol dust control. turf irrigation and other related needs 2. _ The permit fee, the hydrant damage deposit and the meter damage de osit is submitted with the gRplication. d. Permit Conditions and Restrictions. A germit issued hereunder shall be subject to the following standards and any violation thereof shall constitute grounds for revocation of the ennit: 1. The permit shall be in the possession of the water hydrant user ursuant to the permit while the water hydrant is in use. 2. The permitholder shall take all necesspa actions to prevent the water meter or other City QWRment from being damaged. stolen or operated by Imauthorized Rersons. 3. The permitholder shall pay all water use ch r es no later than the due date gRecified by ±LCit y for its apecific account. 4. The water hydmt shall not be used for an p ose_other than that for which the permit was issued. 5. The Rermitholder shall not use an hydrant other than the hydrant for which the vermit was snecificallv issued. 6. No water hydrant shall be used exc t with the use of a City - issued water meter gLoperly installed. e. D2Rosits and Use Charges. An applicant for a hermit hereunder shall make a hydrant damage deposit and ameter damMe deposit the amounts of which shall be established by Council by resolution, from time to time. The deposits shall be retumed to the applicant only after compliance with the following conditions: 1. The meter and other equipment provided to the applicant has been returned to the. Citv undamaged and in proper .worldng ore deposit shall be forfeited in an amount equal to the costs incmred by the City to repair or replace the damaged meter or other equipment. For every day after the expiration of the permit that the meter or other a ui ment Rrovided by the Cigy is not returned to the Citythe deposit shall be forfeited at the rate of 20% per day. 2. _ Payment of all delinquent or unpaid water use charges accumulated to the date of the termination of the temooM water usage from the water hvdrant. 3. The water hydrant is undamaged and in proper working order. The d osit shall be forfeited to the extent a ual to the costs incurred bythe Citv to r air or reylace the dgMed water hydrant. f. Water Em=M Restrictions. The Ct shall have the rigLt to cancel a � rpt ess such action. without Rdor notice when a water„ emergence within the action. g. All water use charms shall be charged_ against the 2ennitholder and the owner and property for which the water is sought The vermitholder shall be reT&ed to pay the use cbWes at a rate_ established by the CounciL by resolution from time to time. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation!" and Section 3.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: By: E. J. VanOverbeke Its: Clerk Date Ordinance Adopted: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: Thomas A. Egan Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper. Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 Eagan City Council Meeting A. REZONING FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO I-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL OF PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE OF T.H. 149 AT NORTHWEST PARKWAY - CITY OF EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ► To approve or deny a Rezoning of Lots 1 and 2 of Imre Addition (approx. 5.3 acres) from PD Planned Development to I-1 Light Industrial located on the west side of T.H. 149 at Northwest Parkway. FACTS: ► At their March 4, 1996 meeting, the City Council approved rezoning of surrounding properties, subject to final approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, pending Metropolitan Council Approval. This property was intended to be included in that area rezoning, however, it was unintentionally omitted from the legal notice, and therefore could not be considered for rezoning at that time. ► A Ietter from the property owner, Jim Imre dated March 8, 1996 indicates his support for the rezoning from PD to I-1. ► The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this proposed Rezoning at its regular meeting on March 26, 1996. ► The Commission recommends approval of the Rezoning of Lots 1 and 2 of Imre Addition from PD to I-1. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: APC minuted of Mar h 26, 1996, ages hrough Staff report, pages,%, 1 through Page 4 March 26, 1996 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION REZONING - CITY OF EAGAN Chairman Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Rezoning of approximately 5.3 acres from PD (Planned Development) to I-1 (Limited Industrial) for property currently platted as Lots 1 and 2, Imre Addition, except the part in the highway located on the west side of Highway 149, in the SE'/4 of Section 2. Planner Farnham introduced this item. Ms. Farnham highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated March 13, 1996. Ms. Farnham noted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject property. Ms. Farnham noted that the subject property was intended to be included with the rezoning of the "triangle" area reviewed at the February APC meeting but it was unintentionally omitted from the public hearing notice and thus had to be considered separately. The property owner, James Imre, was present and stated that he consents to the rezonmg. Member Burdorf moved, Member Frank seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Rezoning of approximately 5.3 acres from PD (Planned Development) to I- 1 (Limited Industrial) for property currently platted as Lots 1 and 2, Imre Addition, except the part in the highway located on the west side of Highway 149, in the SETA of Section 2. All approved in favor. 120 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: March 13, 1996 APPLICANT: City of Eagan CASE: 2-RZ-5-3-96 HEARING DATE: March 26, 1996 PROPERTY OWNER: James Imre PREPARED BY: Julie Farnham REQUEST: Rezonings from PD Planned Development to I-1 Light Industrial LOCATION: On the west side of TH 149 at the intersection with Northwest Parkway COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial Planned Development (CPD); pending redesignation to BP Business Park ZONING: Planned Development (PD) SUMMARY OF REQUEST The City of Eagan is proposing a Rezoning of 5.35 acres from PD Planned Development to I-1 Light Industrial for property described as Lots 1 and 2, Imre Addition, located on the west side of TH 149 in the SE 1/4 of Section 2. This property was not included in the rezoning of the "triangle" area reviewed at the February APC meeting because it was unintentionally omitted from the public hearing notice. Rezoning of this property from PD to I-1 was intended as part of the overall area rezoning. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 11.40, Subd. 5 A. Provisions, states that "amendments changing the boundaries of any district or changing the regulations of any existing district may only be made by an affirmative vote of 2/3rds of all members of the Council."; and Section 11.40, Subd. D. Public Hearing states that "The Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing affording the parties interested the opportunity to be heard." BACKGROUND/HISTORY Historically, this property was zoned for Agriculture, then I-1 Light Industrial uses. Property within the entire "triangle" area was rezoned to PD (Planned Development) in the mid-1970s, however a planned development agreement was never executed to guide development. The property currently includes a variety of light industrial uses, namely, TMI Coatings, Inc (corrosion control) and Auto Dismantling Research Center. At their March 4, 1996 meeting the Eagan City Council approved rezoning of surrounding properties, subject to final approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, pending Metropolitan Council Approval. This property was intended to be included in that area rezoning, 131 Planning Report - City of Eagan Rezoning March 26, 1996 Page 2 however, it was unintentionally omitted from the legal notice and therefore could not be considered for rezoning at that time. SURROUNDING USES North - Proposed Eagan Flagship Business Campus; pending BP land use designation and PD (BP) zoning. East - The Waters; designated CPD, zoned PD South - Light Industrial (Great Dane), vacant; pending BP land use and I-1 zoning West - Residential, vacant; pending BP land use, BP and R-1 zoning EVALUATION OF THE REQUEST Because of the ambiguity of the, present PD zoning, it is unclear what new uses would be allowed on the property. PD zoning is intended to be applied via an agreement that specifies uses and any special conditions relative to that development. In effect, PD zoning does not exist independent of a PD agreement. Every property must be given some zoning classification which defines how it can be used. Property owners look to the City to provide direction on how their property can be used. The intent of the proposed rezoning is to clear up the existing ambiguities to provide better definition and direction regarding the use of this property. Rezoning of this property to I-1 would eliminate the non -conforming status of the existing uses. While the City considers existing residential and industrial uses in the area to be transitional, the City also recognizes that redevelopment of the area to business park uses will occur over the next 10-20, or even more years. In the meantime, removing the non -conforming status of existing uses will allow property owners to make improvements and fully utilize their properties until private market forces trigger redevelopment to business park uses. Policies specific to redevelopment of this area were included in the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment approved by the City Council, pending Metropolitan Council review. These policies outline the City's approach to make the transition from existing uses to future BP uses. SUMMARY/CON ,LUSION This property was intended to be included as part of the area rezonings considered last month by the APC and approved on March 4, 1996 by the City Council. However, it was unintentionally omitted from the legal notice and could not be included in that rezoning. This proposed rezoning is simply a follow up to the rezonings considered last month to complete the area rezonings as originally intended. The property owner, Jim Imre, supports the proposed rezoning to I-1. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED A. To recommend approval or denial of a Rezoning from PD to I-1 for property described as Lots 1 and 2 of Imre Addition. I I 110 950 0 650 MITE'RSTATE 444 ---- - -- "--- _�___—..� -- O'PE1 OR Q ROAD p I I QAL O I r �'• aJ I , H T. LEXiVGT rf4 PjARK �� 1� I U SERVCE � I 5. POST Y " O IF E <o 90 J 94 CO. 26 LOPE OAK 6AD LOPE OAK RO I CO. RD. 25 s i " CLUBYIEW DRII APOLLO ' ROAD I Gt' M►IYYAZ 3s Ii JI' Y U �' � RITA CT. < GEMN RD. ALDMN DR.\ � CT. , P I �' "AC PT. � \, CM PT mus IWAY PT, W. 1 EST RAGE TIL %VIOOO LA. I LLNG tlf000 PT. h PILLS ACE PT. Q � ® a YANKEE E CT. ol M DOODLE ROAD _ - <EE PL- �� 11 ri CARRUC£ AXLS ' S WE OT °E COLF COL04SE , r 7m cT. F 133 LOCATION CIN OF EAGAN EXISTING ZONING PD rk an d Dtvct oP cr.t- 1-1 l itk+ �n�iMs is 1 R-1 5 ing tG ti� �eestder�� A A�r 139 PD �W PF Niplic Fvvli+v P Foxlc PD ' PROPERTY TO BE REZONED FROM PD TO I-1 TRIANGLE OFFICE PARK QHRFc-, BEVEL OFNEN7 2805 Dodd Road * Eagan, Minnesota 55121 0 Telephone (612) 454-6700 City of Eagan Attn: Julie Farnham Planner 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1897 681-4600 • Fax 681-4612 Re: Dear Julie: EJ0,MAR 1 1 1,99 TMI Coatings Zoning for Light Industrial March 8, 1996 Thank you for your letter of March 5, 1996 and PLEASE USE THIS LETTER AS AUTHORIZATION AND MY FORMAL REQUEST TO ASK THE CITY OF EAGAN TO ZONE MY PROPERTY AS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. The specific property for which I am requesting a light industrial zoning is highlighted in the attached drawing and includes: Lot 1 , Lot 2 • Part of Lot 5 N 'fN1S wA7 W -r or The combined land area is 7.68 acres. The property that I own, identified as the Kollofski property, west of the small pond, should be zoned "business park" to blend, in with the current construction planned north of the pond. Therefore, please also consider this letter a formal request to zone my Kollofski property as business park !,'you have any further question or is I can be of any further assistance, pla se do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, LK James D. Imre JocikAmWjuzam Enc: Highlighted Survey of Lot 1, Lot 2, and Part of Lot 5 Letter from City of Eagan dated March 5, 1996 Where 494.35E • HWY 55 • HWY 149 • LEXINGTON AVE. AND THE NEW RIVER BRIDGE MEET LARGEST CLOVERLEAF IN MINNESOTA! /36 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1996 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (TIMBERWOOD VILLAGE) AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - DERRICK INVESTMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ► To approve or deny a Preliminary Subdivision (Timberwood Village Addition) consisting of 16 lots on approximately 14.07 gross acres at the southwest comer of the intersection of Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 9, subject to the conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. ► To approve or deny a Preliminary Planned Development to allow construction of 63 condominiums on Lots 1-16, Block 1 Timberwood Village Addition, on approximately 14.07 gross acres located in the NE 1/4 of Section 9, subject to the conditions recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. FACTS: ► The site poses several limitations on development. The site is fairly narrow, particularly the northern half. This is exacerbated by a Dakota County requirement for a 100 ft. half right-of-way along Pilot Knob Road, which will result in an additional 25 ft. of right-of- way dedication along the east property edge. There are too easements on the site (100 ft. NSP pipeline and 40 ft. City drainage/utility) that restrict placement of buildings. The site has varied topography which requires considerable grading. And, the site contains some stands of trees considered significant woodland. ► The proposed Timberwood Village development will consist of 63 condominiums in 16 four -unit buildings. One of the buildings will also contain a community activity center offering space for residents to meet and recreate. The development will be restricted to adults 55 and older. ► The buildings will be colonial cottage style. Exteriors will consist of vinyl lap siding, some buildings will have partial brick treatment. Most of the units will be one -level, although some walk -outs will be available. All units will have attached garages and patios. Prices will range from approximately $110,000 to" $175,000. ► The proposed density, with 63 units on 12.77 net acres is 4.9 units per acre which is lower than the 6-12 units/acre allowed under D -III land use. ► Access to the site will be via a private street. Driveways serving the buildings will take access onto the private street. 13 The Advisory Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Preliminary Subdivision and Preliminary Planned Development at its regular meeting on March 26, 1996. ► The Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Subdivision (Timberwood Village) and Preliminary Planned Development, subject to the conditions in the staff report. ISSUES: Setback Deviations: The applicant is requesting several deviations from required building and parking setbacks from internal and external streets. Staff notes that the site is difficult to development, at the proposed lower density, without setback deviations. 01 Grading: Approximately 6-14 feet of additional fill are proposed over the existing soil on top of the drainage outlet pipe for LeMay Lake that crosses this site. The additional fill will put additional structural load on the pipe and increase the potential of pipe failure. The developer will be required to protect and maintain the integrity of the pipe. ► Tree Preservation: The proposed development will result in removal of about 83% of the significant woodlands identified by staff. The APRNC recommended that the developer provide a more precise tree inventory and work with staff to recalculate mitigation requirements. BACKGROUND/ATTACHMENTS: APC minutes of March 26, 1996,794 996,pa es through Y.rZ Staff report, pages through 13 g Page 3 March 26, 1996 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT & PRELE IINARY SUBDIVISION - DERRICK INVESTMENT NO. 91 Chairman Miller opened the next public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Subdivision (Timberwood Village) consisting of 14.02 gross acres of unplatted property to create sixteen lots; and a Preliminary Planned Development to allow construction of 63 condominium units for adults age 55 and over on property locate in the southwest corner of Lone Oak and Pilot Knob Road, in the NEI/. of Section 9. Planner Farnham introduced this item. Ms. Farnham highlighted the information presented in the City staffs planning report dated March 20, 1996. Ms. Farnham noted the background and history, the existing conditions and the surrounding uses of the subject property. Ms. Farnham further outlined the City staffs evaluation of the proposed preliminary subdivision and the preliminary planned development. Ms. Farnham noted that the site is difficult to develop at the proposed density without setback deviation due to the topography, narrow property width and the various easements currently on the . property. The applicant, Roger Derrick of Cottage Homesteads of America, presented a revised site plan and two photographs of their condominium units in Inver Grove Heights and West St. Paul. Mr. Derrick noted that the proposed residential development will be marketed for persons 55 and older. They have a special federal exemption which allows the development to restrict its residents to senior citizens. Mr. Derrick further described the proposed development, including the building designs and floor plans, the association amenities and the clubhouse activity center amenities for the residents. A resident who stated that he is a parent of a student at the neighborhood school was concerned about the increase in traffic to the area with the proposed development. The applicant stated that the roadway through the development is a private road and will not be for through traffic and that two-thirds of the residents in their developments are retired, therefore the traffic will be significantly less than if it was a family oriented development. In response to Member Richard's inquiry, Planner Farnham stated that the main impact of the setback deviations is that the development may appear denser. Planner Farnham noted, however, that the site is difficult to develop at the proposed lower density without setback deviations. She added that the setback from Pilot Knob Road may not be very noticeable because it may be a long time before the County widens the road, .even though the ample right-of-way will provide some buffering. Member Burdorf noted his concern that the tree removal is 80% of the significant trees, but Member Frank noted that four of the significant trees are cottonwood and other 139 Page 6 March 26, 1996 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION softwoods which are "garbage" trees. He stated that he would prefer to have those poor quality trees removed and replaced with quality hardwood trees. In response to Member Heyl's inquiry, Mr. Derrick stated that it is intended that the large trees around the boundaries will be saved and that the replacement trees will be bigger that required by Code, rather than plating more trees because of the site's size limitations. Additionally, in response to Member Heyl's inquiry, Mr. Derrick stated that the off-street parking for the clubhouse is an ample parking area because the clubhouse does not function as a party room but is a social gathering place for the residents. In response to Member Segal's inquiry, Mr. Derrick stated that he does not anticipate any conflicts between the proposed residential use and the adjacent baseball and hockey rink uses. Member Heyl moved, Member Richards seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision (Timberwood Village) consisting of 14.02 gross acres of unplatted property to create sixteen lots on property located in the southwest comer of Lone Oak and Pilot Knob Road, in the NEV4 of Section 9, subject to the following conditions: Standard Conditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: B111 B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C411 D19 E1, F1, G1 Gradim 2. The developer shall obtain slope grading easements from ISD No. 197 to accommodate the proposed grading on the Pilot Knob Elementary school site. 3. The developer shall maintain the integrity of the outlet pipe from LeMay Lake which crosses this development and should be responsible for any damage to the pipe as a result of development activities. 4. No grading shall occur within 30 feet of the delineated edge of the wetland on the property. 5. The developer shall submit detailed plans and specifications covering construction of the retaining walls prior to final plat approval. /tLU Page 7 March 26, 1996 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Stonn Drainage/Water Quality 6. The development shall maintain adequate emergency overland drainage for the low point of Pilot Knob Road to drain across the site toward Pond DP -17. 7. Stormwater shall be managed to preserve the wooded character of the Type 7 wetland located along the west edge of the property. 8. The development shall be subject to a cash water quality dedication. Access 9. Restricted access shall be dedicated on the final plat along the entire length of Pilot Knob Road and along Lone Oak Road except in the area of the proposed street access onto Lone Oak Road. 10. Private driveways shall be constructed in accordance with all City Code requirements. 11. Driveway turnarounds shall be constructed as wide as the driveways. 12. No parking shall be allowed on private driveways. Trails 13. The developer shall dedicate a 10 ft. easement for the existing City trail through Pilot Knob Park currently located on a portion of the site. 14. The developer shall provide an internal trail connection from the development to the existing City trail located on the west edge of the site. 15. The developer shall provide a trail easement along Lone Oak Road. 16. The development shall be subject to a cash trails dedication. Tree Preservation 17. The developer shall re -inventory the existing woodlands on site to determine more precisely the actual area of significant woodlands and number of significant trees prior to final subdivision application. Plamn 18. The developer shall plat the property. Page 8 March 26, 1996 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION All approved in favor. Member Heyl moved, Member Richards seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Preliminary Planned Development to allow construction of 63 condominium units for adults age 55 and over on property locate in the southwest corner of Lone Oak and Pilot Knob Road, in the NEV4 of Section 9, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Timberwood Village Planned Development shall consist of 63 condominiums for adults 55 and over, including a community center and private access roadway as shown on the Site Plan submitted. 2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be executed prior to final subdivision (Timberwood Village) and final planned development approval. The following exhibits are necessary to this agreement: * Final Site Plan * Final Landscape Plan * Final Tree Inventory Plan * Final Building Elevation and Signage Plan * Final Lighting PIan Upon submission of these final plans, provided they are in conformance with the Preliminary Planned Development, the Final PD may proceed to the City Council for approval. All approved in favor. PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: March 20, 1996 CASE: 9 -PP -2-2-96 APPLICANT: Roger Derrick (Derrick Invest.) HEARING DATE: March 23, 1996 PROPERTY OWNER: Balfany Development PREPARED BY: Julie Farnham REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision and Preliminary Planned Development LOCATION: SW intersection of Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: D -III Mixed Residential (6-12 units/acre) ZONING: PD (Shields Addition) SUMMARY -OF REQUEST Roger Derrick, of Derrick Investment, is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of 12.77 acres of unplatted property to create 16 lots; and a Preliminary Planned Development to allow construction of 63 condominium units for adults 55 and over located in the southwest comer of Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road, next to Pilot Knob Elementary School in the NE 1/4 of Section 9. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto:" A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding; water storage, and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of the development. /y.3 Planning Report - Derrick Investment March 26, 1996 Page 2 E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgement of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds or similar burden. I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public. Planned Development: Chapter 11.20, Subd. 8, B., Determination. states: "In considering any petition for such district, the Planning Commission and the Council in the interests of carrying out the intent and purpose of this Subdivision, shall determine whether or not such planned development will: (1) better adapt itself to its physical and aesthetic setting and that of surrounding lands than does development of the underlying zoning district; (2) be feasible for the owner and developer economically to complete according to proposed plans; /yy Planning Report - Derrick Investment March 26, 1996 Page 3 (3) benefit the community at large to a greater degree than would development of the underlying zoning district." BACKGROUNDMISTORY In 1975 this property was rezoned from Agriculture to PD (R-3 and R-4). The PD R-4 portion was subsequently rezoned to PD R-3 in 1990. In 1982 a final plat was approved for this property to allow townhouse and multi -family development. However, the approval was revoked due to non-compliance with the subdivision ordinance pertaining to financial guarantees. To date there is no PD Agreement for this property and it remains unplatted. EXISTING COND IONS The site is bound by Lone Oak Road on the north, Pilot Knob Road on the east, Towerview Road on the south and Pilot Knob Elementary School on the west. The site is undeveloped. It has varied topography, generally sloping from surrounding roadways toward the center of the site. Existing vegetation consists of stands of smaller softwood trees (some considered significant woodlands) and a few large cottonwoods (considered significant specimen trees). In addition to some physical limitations posed by topography and trees, the site has other building constraints. First, the site is relatively narrow, particularly the north half, and Dakota County is now requiring a 100 ft. half right-of-way, (versus previous requirement of 75 ft. half) which further reduces the property width. A 100 ft. NSP pipeline easement runs diagonally through the north portion of the site. A 40 ft. wide City drainage and utility easement also bisects the site. While pavement can be placed on top of these easements, buildings cannot. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - Single family residential; zoned R-1, guided D-1 South - Unisys; zoned RD, guided R&D East - LeMay Lake Hills PD (townhomes); zoned PD, guided D -II West - Pilot Knob Elementary and Pilot Knob Park; zoned P and PK, guided PF and P EVALUATION QF REQUEST Preliminary Subdivision and Preliminary Planned Development Project Description - The proposed Timberland Village will consist of 63 condominiums in 16 four -unit buildings. The development will be restricted to adults 55 and over. A community activity center, proposed in building #16, will offer space for residents to meet and recreate and Planning Report - Derrick Investment March 26, 1996 Page 4 will be equipped with a large screen TV, fireplace, exercise room and kitchen. While most of the units will be one -level, some walk -out units will also be available. All units will have attached garages and patios. The floor plans range in size from 970 s.f. to more than 1600 s.f. Prices will range from approximately $110,000 to S 175,000. The proposed Timberwood Village development, should be compatible with adjacent single family and multi -family development as well as Pilot Knob Elementary School. Demand for this type of housing development, which caters to older, empty -nester adults, is growing. The proposed development would be one of the first of its type to locate in Eagan. Lots - The proposed subdivision (Timberwood Village) will consist of 16 lots. Each lot will contain a 4 -unit building. When all the units are constructed the developer intends to create separate tax identification numbers for individual units through a condominium plat. ensi - The proposed density, with 63 units on 12.77 acres is 4.9 units per acre. This is lower than the 6-12 units/acre allowed under D -III land use. Setbacks - The proposed site plan indicates several deviations from setback requirements. Buildings on lots 1, 3, 4 and 12-16 are less than the required 25 ft. from a private road. Building and parking (driveway) setbacks along Lone Oak and Pilot Knob Roads are also less than required by Code. The setback proposed for building #16 is 37 ft. rather than 40 ft. as required by Code. Building setbacks from Pilot Knob are proposed to be 25 ft. (125 ft. from the center line) rather than 50 ft. as required by Code. This setback stems from Dakota County's requirement for a 200 ft. right- of-way (100 ft. half) on Pilot Knob. The current 75 ft. half right-of-way would allow the required 50 ft. building setbacks to be met with the propose site plan. The applicant is challenging Dakota County's requirement for a 100 ft. half right-of-way along this segment of Pilot Knob. To date, the issue has not been resolved. As such, the applicant is requesting a deviation to the 50 ft. required building setback from Pilot Knob as well as deviations from the 25 ft. building setback from the private road. There are also a few places where driveways encroach into the 20 ft. required setback. These include buildings 3, 7, 8, and 16. In addition, the spacing between buildings #2 and #3 is less than 30 ft. There appears to be ample room to shift building #3 south to meet the 30 ft. building spacing requirement. Grading - The site generally slopes towards the west edge of the development near the center of the site. This existing slope provides overland drainage for the low point on Pilot Knob Road to drain to the west during large storm events. The grading of the site with this development should maintain adequate emergency overland drainage for the low point of Pilot Knob Road to drain across the site to the west. The preliminary grading plan shows maximum cuts of 11 feet Planning Report - Derrick Investment March 26, 1996 Page 5 and maximum fills of 14 feet. It also depicts slope grading extending off the site onto the Pilot Knob Elementary (ISD No. 197) property to the west near the access to Lone Oak Road. The developer should obtain slope grading easements from ISD No. 197 for this proposed grading. The developer is proposing to construct retaining walls in five locations. Detailed plans and specifications covering the construction of these retaining walls should be submitted prior to final plat approval. The existing outlet pipe with a 40 -foot wide drainage and utility easement for LeMay Lake crosses this development east to west through the middle of the site. The developer is proposing to place approximately 6 to 14 feet of additional fill over the existing 20 to 22 feet of soil on top of the pipe. This proposed fill will put additional structural load on the pipe and will increase the potential of pipe failure. Engineering staff is concemed about the structural strength of this pipe if the area over the pipe is graded as proposed. The developer must protect and maintain the integrity of this pipe by: 1) removing the existing pipe in the proposed area of additional fill and replacing it with a pipe of adequate strength to accommodate the additional load proposed; or 2) decreasing the potential load on the pipe by acceptable trench engineering methods subject to approval by City staff; or 3) maintaining the existing grades over the pipe. The developer should ensure the structural integrity of the outlet pipe by one or a combination of these altematives and should be responsible for any damage to the pipe as a result of development activities. Storm Drainage/Water Ouality - This property is located in Drainage Basin D just downstream of LeMay Lake. Stormwater runoff from this development will drain to Pond DP -17, a 2.7 acre Type 3 cattail marsh identified as a Class III scenic recreation water body in the City's Water Quality Management Plan. Pond DP -17 is the only downstream recreational water body. The only feasible location for a treatment pond within the development is a 0.16 acre Type 7 wetland located along the western edge of the site just east of Pond DP -17. Consideration was given to recommending that the developer excavate this wetland to create a wet pond for stormwater treatment. However, because the wetland is heavily wooded, it would help provide screening between the proposed development and the City trail and Pilot Knob Park along the westem margin of the property. In addition, Pond DP -17 supports a wetland community that is more resistant to stormwater impacts than other types of wetland communities. For these reasons, staff recommends that the development be subject to a cash water quality dedication and that stormwater be managed to avoid adverse impact to the woodland in the Type 7 wetland. Wetlands - As mentioned previously, there is one wetland on the site. No fill or drain impacts are proposed for this wetland. In addition, staff has requested that the developer provide a 30 - foot wide ungraded buffer along the edge of the wetland. The revised grading plan for the site complies with this request. /1� Planning Report - Derrick Investment March 26, 1996 Page 6 "Jiitt - The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and capacity is readily available to this site from an existing line that crosses Pilot Knob Road near Lots 3 and 4. The development is proposing to utilize this connection and serve the entire site by gravity flow. Water main of sufficient pressure and capacity is available to serve this development along the north and south edges of the development within Lone Oak Road and Towerview Road. The developer is proposing to loop water main through this development by extending water main from Lone Oak Road to Towerview Road. Access/Street Design - The developer proposes to construct one private street in a north -south alignment that will connect to Lone Oak Road on the north and Towerview Road on the south. The preliminary site plan shows 14 private driveways which take access onto this private street. The driveway will serve from 2 to 10 townhouse units. The private driveways should be constructed in accordance with all City Code requirements. Staff notes that the driveway turnarounds should be as wide as the driveways to accommodate emergency vehicle maneuvering. In addition, parking should not be allowed on the driveways to ensure adequate emergency vehicle access. The site plan also indicates 11 parking spaces directly off the private street to serve the community center. This situation poses safety concerns and staff has requested that the developer create on -street parking for the community center. Easements/Rights of Wav/Permits - The Dakota County Plat Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat for the development and is requiring the dedication of 100 feet of half right-of- way for Pilot Knob Road on the east edge of the development and 60 feet of half right-of-way for Lone Oak Road on the north edge of the development on the final plat. Current half right-of- ways are 75 ft. along Pilot Knob and 40 ft. on Lone Oak. Also, restricted access should be dedicated on the final plat along the entire length of Pilot Knob Road and along Lone Oak Road except in the area of the proposed street access onto Lone Oak Road. No right-of-way for the internal through street will be dedicated with the plat since the street will be privately owned and maintained. With the additional fill proposed over the outlet pipe from LeMay Lake as mentioned above, the developer is proposing to dedicate sufficient drainage and utility easement to accommodate a 1:1 slope on both sides of the pipe. A 100 ft. NSP pipeline easement runs diagonally through the north and west part of the site. The applicant has negotiated with NSP to reduce the easement to 50 ft. A letter from NSP dated April 17, 1995 indicates that they are willing to release the gas easements not required for the existing pipeline, subject to NSP approval of the grading and site layout plans. This will reduce the easement from 100 feet to 50 feet as shown on the proposed site plan. Planning Report - Derrick Investment March 26, 1996 Page 7 Tree Preservation - The tree inventory submitted indicates 214,520 s.f of significant woodlands and 4 significant trees on site. Species composition within the woodlands is mostly softwood deciduous trees (poplar, box elder and willow) ranging from 4" to about 10" in diameter. The proposed development will result in removal of about 83% of the woodlands. Allowable removal is 47.5%. Consequently 76,043 s.f. of woodland (304 category B trees) must be replaced. This woodland replacement is in addition to any landscape requirements. At their March 18, 1996 meeting, the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission recommended that the developer re -inventory the existing woodlands on site to determine more precisely the actual area of significant woodlands and number of significant trees. Following re -inventory, the developer should work with staff to recalculate mitigation requirements, and to the extent possible, modify the site layout to reduce significant woodland removal. Parks and Trails - In 1975 approximately 10 acres of land was dedicated to the City by Martin and Myrtle Shields. The conveyance resolution states that "no additional land shall be required to be dedicated for park and open space purposes in accordance City Ordinances". However, that dedication did not apply to trails. Therefore a cash trail dedication is required to accommodate construction of trails along the south side of Lone Oak and the west side of Pilot Knob Road. It also appears that a portion of the existing City trail through Pilot Knob Park encroaches on this property. As such, a 10 ft. easement should be provided for the trail which would include 5 ft. for access and maintenance. In addition, given the close proximity of this development to Pilot Knob Park and the presence of the existing trail, staff suggests that a trail connection be provided from the development to the existing City trail along the west edge of the site. This connection will likely have to be provided from a private driveway, such as between buildings 11 and 12 or buildings 13 and 14. Landscaping - The landscape plan submitted is acceptable with some modifications. Given the requested setback deviation and higher noise levels adjacent to Pilot Knob, the landscape screening should be quite dense to provide good visual screening and some noise mitigation. While most of the proposed planting along Pilot Knob should provide good screening, the area east of building #3 should be enhanced with trees and shrubs. Building„ Elevations - The proposed 22 foot high buildings will be colonial cottage style. The exterior finish will consist of vinyl lap siding with accent window shutters and roof cupolas. The buildings will also have front porches or stoops with picket railings. Signage - Entrance monument signs for the development are proposed at the north and south entrances. These signs will consist of a brick monument with a 4 s.f name plate. The brick /�9 Planning Report - Derrick Investment March 26, 1996 Page 8 monument will be flanked by picket fencing. monument. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION A light will be placed on top of the brick The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create 16 lots on 12.77 acres of unplatted property and a Preliminary Planned Development to allow construction of 63 condominium units for adults 55 and over. The development will also include a community activity center. The proposed density of 4.9 units per acre is lower than the 6-12 units per acre allowed for areas designated for D -III Mixed Residential land use. Staff notes that the site is difficult to develop, at the proposed lower density, without setback deviations and other site impacts due to its narrow width, particularly at the north end, and the existence of an NSP pipeline easement and City utility easement on the property. The applicant is requesting several deviations from required building and parking setbacks. In addition, the site contains some significant woodlands and varied topography that make development more complicated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED A. To recommend approval or denial of the proposed Preliminary Subdivision (Timberwood Village) consisting of sixteen (16) lots on currently unplatted property, subject to the following conditions: Standard Cgnditions 1. The developer shall comply with these standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, D1, E1, F1, GI Grading 2. The developer shall obtain slope grading easements from ISD No. 197 to accommodate the proposed grading on the Pilot Knob Elementary school site. 3. The developer shall maintain the integrity of the outlet pipe from LeMay Lake which crosses this development and should be responsible for any damage to the pipe as a result of development activities. 4. No grading shall occur within 30 feet of the delineated edge of the wetland on the property. 5. The developer shall submit detailed plans and specifications covering construction of the /S0,00 Planning Report - Derrick Investment March 26, 1996 Page 9 retaining walls prior to final plat approval. Storm Drainage/Water Quality 6. The development shall maintain adequate emergency overland drainage for the low point of Pilot Knob Road to drain across the site toward Pond DP -17. 7. Stormwater shall be managed to preserve the wooded character of the Type 7 wetland located along the west edge of the property. S. The development shall be subject to a cash water quality dedication. Access 9. Restricted access shall be dedicated on the final plat along the entire length of Pilot Knob Road and along Lone Oak Road except in the area of the proposed street access onto Lone Oak Road. 10. Private driveways shall be constructed in accordance with all City Code requirements. 11. Driveway turnarounds shall be constructed as wide as the driveways. 12. No parking shall be allowed on private driveways. Trails 13. The developer shall dedicate a 10 ft. easement for the existing City trail through Pilot Knob Park currently located on a portion of the site. 14. The developer shall provide an internal trail connection from the development to the existing City trail located on the west edge of the site. 15. The developer shall provide a trail easement along Lone Oak Road. 16. The development shall be subject to a cash trails dedication. Tree Preservation 17. The developer shall re -inventory the existing woodlands on site to determine more precisely the actual area of significant woodlands and number of significant trees prior to final subdivision application. Platting 19. The developer shall plat the property. /S/ Planning Report - Derrick Investment March 26, 1996 Page 10 B. To recommend approval or denial of the proposed Preliminary Planned Development (Timberwood Village) to allow construction of 63 condominiums on Lots 1-16, Block 1 Timberwood Villages Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Timberwood Village Planned Development shall consist of 63 condominiums for adults 55 and over, including a community center and private access roadway as shown on the Site Plan submitted. 2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be executed prior to final subdivision (Timberwood Village) and final planned development approval. The following exhibits are necessary to this agreement: * Final Site Plan * Final Landscape Plan * Final Tree Inventory Plan * Final Building Elevation and Signage Plan * Final Lighting Plan Upon submission of these final plans, provided they are in conformance with the Preliminary Planned Development, the Final PD may proceed to the City Council for approval. /Sa STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. FinancialOblivations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10 foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. /5 3 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements I. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission Approved: Aug ust 25, 1987 LTS*5 STANDARD.CON City Council September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 Revised: February Z. 1993 /S � FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Timberwood Village There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $2,747 on the parcels proposed for platting. The pay-off balance will be allocated to the lots created by the plat. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for platting. The estimated financial obligation presented is subject to change based upon areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final plat. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and the connections proposed to be made to the City's utility system based on the submitted plans. Improvement Use Rate Quantity Anxii t Lateral Benefit Water Trunk M.F. $5.60/ff 400 ff $ 2,240 Lateral Benefit Water Trunk M.F. $25.90/ff 1,200 ff 31,080 Storm Sewer Trunk M.F. $.02/sq ft 610,711 sq ft 12.214 Total4�5} 34 /ss ^ LOCATION _—`^"``"`�...•....�. J (,� Ili �I II'Ic 1 lj II' I�v i ! 011-02�-�.....,.,-� u� I"Ic 4 I ��•- � 1 _SISTE00,- II III I••, . _�^��— 1 �,_,'� ! >✓�l �,,.—._� IIS jl I �;�. t 0 OF EAGAN - - 012-02 � I I • �� 1 M�tll � � � alll IILm mons -- — — —— I--� �.----__---- ^_-------------------- _. 7�1 •I ' 1 l .1 rl-__�__� I---11 � ,� ,�. �\ .mil' .J' 1 _--____-�� \=y-•�0-__-___--___-�----I __-__- �� ' 1 ill 111 1- ol __--- ��Y--__------------------- L. - ��i ♦ ; 1 Il� _ , � .• I i t III 7 i D. c % •rt' �' - .I /� AREA MAP ' - I 9li MiEIMLL FIELD- • SCHOOL DIS' . No. 1971 010 ILI _ 1 ----------- Vp _—`^"``"`�...•....�. J (,� Ili �I II'Ic 1 lj II' I�v i ! 011-02�-�.....,.,-� u� I"Ic 4 I ��•- � 1 _SISTE00,- II III I••, . _�^��— 1 �,_,'� ! >✓�l �,,.—._� IIS jl I �;�. t 0 OF EAGAN - - 012-02 � I I • �� 1 M�tll � � � alll IILm mons -- — — —— I--� �.----__---- ^_-------------------- _. 7�1 •I ' 1 l .1 rl-__�__� I---11 � ,� ,�. �\ .mil' .J' 1 _--____-�� \=y-•�0-__-___--___-�----I __-__- �� ' 1 ill 111 1- ol __--- ��Y--__------------------- L. - ��i ♦ ; 1 Il� _ , � .• I i t III 7 i D. c % •rt' �' - .I /� AREA MAP 4 �7F o 3 ° Q y L r" ny Q a q �� F [c.� o G�i7 97S' O� 1 _ • 11%II I I i �f1 i ,I F4 a F E. P 5 F- w E Z U as z 6z M8 am /S-Jp F- w E Z U o O LL U I.I. O X X ... it Q —_ Z Z m OL �, p Y o L� N E E U Q 1— .r Q c� co E v C o -!e Y N � O 0 0 V) E E U q a> L`Z M o •-+ —— O= vl V f H O 0 <Z rn ami w 4)R O LL J t7 v 'v co 0� I v Q — p- 3 3 O 3N 3N Y ~a QQ� 0: 2Z CL I I <}Q I I I m U cn cn JJ (7 w o O> w * C)c0 00 Oo 00 O O Q M M M cn cn ►— cn o as z 6z M8 am /S-Jp O p l F � � w , dos aA�e .. ;�•� ;�� o-�;� Mill A t}PYpTE Ia -y� : a � 9 i F SIO al ly�;t a ;� t} i 1 t i� pe t IiIB { ie 1y Pon � F a !�i ip a mw 151 Ll I pop; 1111111 tI }Ltitpt7� 91ii9p$¢°5i pi �I FB�F� }�t� iFcF!°'�c�i tont=tip!!' . „ Iiiici?91ee /60 i 1 /60 o Z'� 0 o Q N L IF 1-QZ - W — n _ l,j s i Or0a .Tl WS 3n01 Ol 5537- _ 5'S06 0 Oe i s 081 2 i.: o� _ ...,.fir 1 1 m e 0:uuu +1 C x yaa vitt .O.NIC ///J!J!J! ( is N=x NNN p�tV� e�IC 01 D 01 h h 1 0 e 1 L J . till —m— .N•.N L pCl�r • @ 1 0 Yi- �•3, ,! O� �J. f 1 e 13 CA N ZI z MN64 C _ I m e ou�i 1 1 J re co 1fA ' / i•' 1 ' / 3j61/,99 .695 J. 1:��;N � ; 7 x•.1.1 • s O'; aCR:Ol Li 1 i •-3 d -d 0.1 • E ;Afl + •'3' / I C. .NI I • • 1I 1 1. 'OOl r .Z • �...3.61 95.695 ,�--------- ,3�rrrbi 3 slHi 01 a310A J JSI. aw(% HN0' rD 31 61 S9399r 6 . f 3.ei. .695, ON H' d S ' r a- DN V S 0 a Sn" ;TJ OL a A 4 --J 1 0I 4c ? i rwi� 40 L11 0 a A 4 tt-/ON -H-V S'O 1 0I 4c ? i rwi� 40 L11 0 1 NI tt-/ON -H-V S'O M 'NVJy3 d0 SQy31S3WOH 30Y1100 AVDJ 032Md3ild f Y1053NN1MI 'NdJY3 �9VTIJA aooxa3enzi �i a =1) O Z Y N Y� N Uin V c 0 C �m -E a E-> u w a U m Uin 002x U 0< ��W -E a :n- —:==° °�=� °1 .g a%"—•e••O. as oii � _ e°�• _ _ � a•°°ss - o _ `:fi Se.ig'.8`:'.R 666 �° ��"- <U « �� i e �= • I �:°• Y�.. ee•e=- noon E � - - --_ ir e O VI ze �Z s- epv c- i i2 �O = 3^O ..c eo-Z n•�o.°. 1 =a^ ••�_..�. iii i W W < m � iie - -<oWV1 00=0 - -�-• <<J - � I -� oo-s---°aW Ir z .� a a.•_ Z� -nom a-=eo°i.ri=o--W - y Timberwood Village Presented by: COTTAGE HOMESTEADS Of AMERICA (Lot Areas) Block i Lot 1 36,601 sq. ft. Lot 2 22,394 sq. ft. Lot 3 24,805 sq. ft. Lot 4 30,244 sq. ft. Lot 5 30,370 sq. ft. Lot 6 35,449 sq, ft. Lot 7 31,891 sq. ft. Lot 8 32,418 sq. ft. Lot 9 35,129 sq. ft. Lot 10 37,063 sq. ft. Lot 11 33,230 sq. ft. Lot 12 37,989 sq. ft. Lot 13 45,326 sq. ft. Lot 14 33,657 sq. ft. Lot 15 53,207 sq. ft. Lot 16 36,700 sq. ft. TOTAL 556,473 sq. ft. f 12.77 acres M y � JO SGV31S3r40H 3oviloo 46 J! if I I FSOV'11'11A (100A 38"LL I 1801 03byd3bd VlOS3NNIM 'NVOV3 ti ........ - -------- .............. - - -Jm %YW3 A SCPv31S3mm 30Y110O 180A 03MVd3bd vlos3wm IWOV3 (C73,D!V'IrIIA (100AN38P(I.L ............................../.. ........................................... .... .. ....... 0 '301 *WVV3 A SCW31S3VOH 3911I103 WOJ 03Wd3bd VIOUNNIM *WDY3 SOV111A QOOAV38KIL .0. 1. - I -- - .. ..... .. . ...... 111L ... [.3 L . ...... * .......... ......................... L ................................. 612 831 1215 TEL:612-831-1215 Mar 07'96 16:41 No.015 P.02 Northem Statos Powor COrnpany h5p Gas Utility 025 nice Street Sarni Paul. Mmnasota 551 17-5459 April 17, 1995 Mr. Roger Derrick RECEIVED MAR 1 1 1996 _ Derrick Investment Company 7301 Ohms Lane Suite 560 Edina, MN 55439 Re. NSP Gas Easement for Line TL0204 (Map D-52) SW quadrant, Pilot Knob Rd and Lone Oak Rd, Eagan Dear Mr. Derrick: This is to inform you that Northern States Power Company will release the gas easements, over the subject property, which are not required for the existing 12" gas line. It is likely that these "extra" easements were mistakenly defined in anticipation of a future gas line relocation which never occurred. The 100 foot wide easement for the presently existing 12" gas transmission line will be reduced to 50 feet in width, subject to Northern States Power Company Gas Utility approval of the grading plan and the building layout plan. Sincerely, Nick J. Boosalis, P.E. Engineer 229-2317 c: Juan Galloway hA0WVe"iC Q.dQc cy ire m o p c x AM I3. r �x PN AIR e�A ' ap� O m o p c x