12/17/1987 - City Council RegularAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY HALL
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1987
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE)
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
III. 6:40 - SPECIAL PRESENTATION
IV. 6:45 - DAKOTA COUNTY"- PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENTS (BLUE)
V. 6:50 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE)
A. FINANCE DEPARTMENT
1. AWARD - Financial Reporting Achievement
�3 B. FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. FUNDING - Firefighters Compensation
C. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE - Conformance to Subdivision
Development Plans (L4, B14, Bridle Ridge Addition)
VI. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (ORCHID)
{� (a A. PERSONNEL ITEMS
(` •12 B. FINAL PLAT, Cray Addition
`•��i C. FINAL PLAT, Woodlands Addition
(cp D. PROJECT 529, Cliff Lake Galleria & Towers, Receive Petition/Order
Feasibility Report and Plans and Specifications
(J l(o E. PROJECT 528, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th Addition, Receive
Petition/Order Feasibility Report
F. FINAL PLAT, Sunrise Addition
VIII. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON)
VIII1.. OLD BUSINESS (PINK)
p- t1 A. FINAL RATIFICATION, 1988 General Fund and Public Utilities
1 Operating Budgets
B. WAIVER OF PLAT, Pond View Planned Development, TXI, Inc., Combine 4
Existing Parcels into 2 Separate Parcels
C. CONSIDERATION OF EAW/Cliff Lake Galleria & Towers Project
1 I%. NEW BUSINESS (TAN)
�Z A. RECOMMENDATION/Solid Waste Commission Recycling Facility
P 3l B. CONSIDERATION of Joint Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission Budget
�( C. VARIANCE, Sunrise Hills Addition, Argus Development, 10'Variance to
�• the 30' Front Yard Setback on. Lots 28, 29, and 30, Block 2 and Lots
8 and 9, Block 3
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Judith & Orlin Myrlie, fora Day Care
VV Facility at a Single Family Residence in Light Industrial District,
820 Lone Oak Road
s E.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Health Central Enterprises, to allow pylon
signage for the Health One Urgent Care Facility, Lot 1, Block 1,
Norwest 2nd Addition along Pilot Knob Road
Sj F.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Lexington Center, to Allow a Pylon Sign on
Lot 1 , Block 1 , Eagan Center 1 st Addition
G.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Naegele Outdoor Advertising, to Allow a
Billboard Advertising Sign Along Hwy. 13 on Lot 3 of the Dallas
Development 2nd Addition.
H.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Triangle Metallurgical Inc., to Allow a
Freight Terminal in a LI (Light Industrial) District Along State
Hwy. 149.
`i I.
WAIVER OF PLAT, Blackhawk Plaza, Inc., to Combine the Western 15'
of Lot 4 with Lot 5 of the Blackhawk Plaza Addition for an Automo-
tive Service Station Located along Diff ley Road
J.
WAIVER OF PLAT, Edward McMenomy/Kirchner, to Split 22.06
Agricultural Acres into Two Separate Parcels with Different
Ownership Containing 5.81 and 16.25 Acres, Respectively, West of
87 K.
Hwy. 3 and North of Carol Street
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Arcon Construction Company,
Berry Ridge Addition,
REZONING, and a
PRELIMINARY PLAT for 1.47 R-3 (Townhouse) Acres within the Hilltop
of Eagan Addition to One R-2 Duplex Lot and Four R-1 (Single
103
Family) Lots Along Hilltop Lane and Berry Ridge Road
L.
PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT), Donald Christenson, Buffer Hills 2nd
Addition, of Lot 5 Buffer Hills Addition into 4 Single Family Lots
on 2.1 Acres, South of Crestridge Lane/East of Pilot Knob Road
�M.
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Opus Corporation, Eagandale
Center Industrial Park 9th Addition
PRELIMINARY PLAT of 33.8 LI (Light Industrial) and GB (General
Business) Acres Containing 6 Industrial/Commercial Lots
REZONING of 8.38 LI and GB acres to a Roadside Business Planned
Development District with a Hotel and Restaurant on Lots 1 & 2,
Block 1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS for a Building in Excess of 35' and a Pylon
Sign South of Lone Oak Road and West of Lexington Avenue
X. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD)
x.14( A. Pilot Knob Road - Temporary and Permanent Easements
15 (B. Williams Brothers Pipeline Company/Westbury Addition
%I. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN)
%II. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
%III. ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: DECEMBER 10, 1987
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR DECEMBER 17, 1987 MEETING
APPROVE�MINUTES/ADOPT AGENDA
After approval is given to the December 17, 1987 agenda, and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the December 1, 1987 meeting and
special City Council minutes for the November 23, 1987 meeting, the
following items are in order for consideration.
� .-SPECIAL .PRESENTAT:I'ON
There will be a special presentation recognizing the years of public
service given by Mayor Bea Blomquist and City Councilmember Jim
Smith.
DAKOTA; COUNTY%- PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENTS'•
Mr. Bill Peterson, Dakota County Assessor's Office, is recommending
a real estate tax abatement for Regina Hummel who resides in a
condominium unit located at the intersection of Abbey Way and St.
Francis Way immediately west of Lexington Avenue. Apparently, the
amount of percentage of completion for January 2, 1986 was
incorrect. The estimated market value should be reduced from
$68,100 to $35,800. The assessed value should be reduced from
$19,068 to $10,024. For a location map, refer to the attached
drawing on page '2,- .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appove or deny the tax
abatement as recommended by the Dakota County Assessor's Office for
Regina Hummel.
N
r
SUBJECT PARCEL
10-65903-005-04
REGINA HUMMEL
co
D
co
co
m'
D
LA
WAY
m
c
m
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
L. DgP.AR'fI1V'.HEAIBiiSSNE-
A. FINANCE DEPARTMENT:
Item 1. Award of Financial Reporting Achievement --Mayor Blomquist
has received notification by the Government Finance Officers
Association that our Director of Finance/City Clerk Gene Van
Overbeke is again the recipient of an award of Financial Reporting
Achievement. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of
recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and
its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a
government and its management. Gene will be present to receive the
certificate.
There is no formal action required on this matter.
B. FIRE DEPARTMENT:
Item 1. Funding for Firefighters Compensation --The proposed 1988
Operating Budget includes a personal services expenditure in the
amount of $190,000. This expenditure is considered volunteer
firefighter compensation for fighting fires, meetings, training,
officer's pay and related employment services. As discussed at the
December 1, 1987 meeting, it is the Fire Chief's calculation that
approximately $206,000 will be required for volunteer firefighter
compensation realizing that the City will compensate all new
trainees at the beginning of their training. Fire Chief Southorn
and the City Administrator are discussing methods to adjust the
budget to allow an increase under the category of compensation.
Information will be available as a part of the Administrative Agenda
on Wednesday, December 16.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an
increase in the compensation amount for volunteer firefighters from
$190,000 to $206,000.
3
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
C. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT:
Item 1. Building Permit Issuance/Conformance to Subdivision
Development Plans (Lot 4, Block 14, Bridle Ridge Addition) --As a
part of the City's increased efforts to perform more detailed review
of development within the City, the new engineering tech position
authorized as a part of the 1987 budget has been reviewing
individual single family building permits to determine if the
proposed house plans properly conform to City and development
standards in relationship to the lot being built upon.
Recently, a building permit application and related site plan as
shown on page was submitted for Lot 4, Block 14, Bridle
Ridge Addition. In reviewing the proposed finish floor elevations,
it was determined that this required the placement of 4 feet of
additional fill in the rear yard walkout area in relationship to the
approved subdivision development/grading plan processed with the
final plat approval for the Bridle Ridge Addition as shown on page
(0 Although this would not negatively impact the drainage
ability of the four adjacent lots, it would result in the rear yard
area being approximately 3.5 to 4.5 feet higher than the proposed
back yard elevations of the adjacent lots.
Based on our concerns regarding the proposed revision to the
approved development plan, the revised grading plan for Lot 4 was
submitted as shown on page.
Upon further investigation of this proposed revision at the site, it
was determined that the footing and full block foundation for a
split entry house had been constructed prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
The builder and the developers engineer feel that the placement of
a split entry walkout on a proposed full walkout lot is not a
specific deviation from the approved development plan as long as
overall site drainage can be maintained. While the engineering
division agrees with the technical workability of this revision, it
is being brought to the Council's attention to receive direction as
to the extent of review and discretion the staff should exercise in
trying to maintain conformity to the approved development plan and
uniformity with the overall development. Currently, the builder has
indicated a hardship regarding conformance to the original approved
development plan due to the fact that the footing and block
foundation already exists. The developer and other builders would
also like to determine the amount of flexibility allowed in
modifications to the approved development plans as individual house
site plans are submitted.
Enclosed on pages i through is a letter sent to the
developer regarding this issue. Itis anticipated that both the
builder and the developer will be at the Council meeting to discuss
this issue.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the revised
grading plan and related building permit for Lot 4, Block 14, Bridle
Ridge 1st Addition. 4
sUHVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
ASN gsgs
M I Li, RUN
S86042 3"W1 889.5 D" 3
0 1
12.0 1. 63.83 R�18 o a
990 ' t
`
4 �5
to
gs ZA.33 m
ggo r� ••,4 5�0'1
/
A/ 33/-83
n 1 W O
O
C1 m om, OSED p
pRHOUSE w
Ln
46-00' W
o
u� x B� C889 z> o
W 1 1
0 N �
a, l` m
LA
1
m 1
pRpEMEINp6E.r pER PU►T7\ 5
6, I
��•• EpSN �1 I
5 � o ggoa x
,` xg o N74o34�32,�
-
-76.3c)
�l
BURR OAK BUILDERS
Z
DENOTES PROPOSED SURFACE DRAINAGE
0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET SCALE: 1 INCH — 30 FEET
0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR — $92.3 FEET
X000.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED LOWEST FLOOR — eg9.•S FEET
(000.0) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF BLOCK — $92.? FEET
0 DENOTES NAIL SET
WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO BURR OAK BUILDERS THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT
REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF:
Lot 4. Block 14, BRIDLE RIDGE I ST ADDITION, according to the recorded
plot thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota.
IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW IMPROVEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. AS
SURVEYED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERV
1StOS HIS/ Il,7u DAY OF C1W Ft�K'� r ,19 �n
SIGNED: JA S LL, INC.
BY:✓ —
HAROLD C. PETER ON, LAND SURVEYOR
MINNESOTA LICENSE NUMBER 12294
m
m
_
O
r m
CO 0
m
00__
D
M
r D
O
m OZ
n
N i
a1 D
0
V
m
-D Z
T
O
m
I
James R. Hill, inc.
PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS
9401 JAMES AVE. S.. BLOOMINGTON, MN. 55431 • 612-884-3029
r ............
;TT
�� /\ w1 % \ � to � .�... �.� ,. ...•
Nil, x
h s
to g'
o f
Cf
:Ac ff
i�, _ °� m,��`:..•, ,� Ste.
,....-. .,r .-•QQ
f s o�$ � . •�� Fes: �� .�� ...•=�. ,>� ��... c�-''"'..., -
co
ir
it
�.,
LCp, - m r i f :�.� CPQ Q - y,'_.. . \ :'�•
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
.m
{
BURR OAK BUILDERS
i
P�
-- - .• . - � .r i3s,.� �-,,,•rte �{���� kf i < '�''-t !1
SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET
NOTE: THE BASE MAP FOR THIS SKETCH IS PART OF
THE GRADING PLAN FOR BRIDLE RIDGE 1ST ADDITION
REVISED -GRADING PLAN FOR
LOT 4, BLOCK 14, BRIDLE RIDGE 1ST ADDITION
R.1-1111 Inc.Jam-es 7
PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS
9401 JAMES AVE, S. • BLOOMINGTON, MN. 55431 • 612.084.3029
i
P�
-- - .• . - � .r i3s,.� �-,,,•rte �{���� kf i < '�''-t !1
SCALE: 1 INCH = 50 FEET
NOTE: THE BASE MAP FOR THIS SKETCH IS PART OF
THE GRADING PLAN FOR BRIDLE RIDGE 1ST ADDITION
REVISED -GRADING PLAN FOR
LOT 4, BLOCK 14, BRIDLE RIDGE 1ST ADDITION
R.1-1111 Inc.Jam-es 7
PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS
9401 JAMES AVE, S. • BLOOMINGTON, MN. 55431 • 612.084.3029
P
LSF e'agan
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
Mayor
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
THOMASEGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
MC ELLISON
December 4, 1987
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Administrator
ROD HARDY
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
SIENNA CORP
Cily Clerk
4940 VIKING DR SUITE 608
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435
Re: Bridle Ridge Addition
Conformance of Development to Approved Subdivision Plans
Dear Mr. Hardy:
4
Recently, the City of Eagan encountered a situation with Mr. Tim
Jaywar of Burr Oak Builders regarding the application of a
building permit for Lot 4, Block 14, Bridle Ridge Addition.
In reviewing the site plan submitted with the building permit
application, it was discovered that the proposed house and
related lot grading did not conform to the overall site grading
plan approved with the Bridle Ridge subdivision. Subsequently,
the building permit application was not processed due to the
identified deviation. Further site investigation indicated that
the excavation, footings, and block foundation had already been
completed prior to the issuance of the building permit.
In a follow-up meeting with City personnel, Mr. Jaywar indicated
that when purchasing the lot, representatives of your development
firm and your engineering firm, J. R. Hill, Inc., indicated that
there are no problems associated with deviating from the approved
site development or grading plan as long as setbacks and drainage
problems were not created.
When the City reviewed the proposed development plans for your
subdivision, it was with the understanding that development would
occur in conformance with the ultimate approved plans. This is
essential, as the City uses these plans to inform new and
existing property owners of what has been committed to be
constructed in that area. Subsequently, these property owners
rely on the integrity of the City to ensure that what has been
approved will be constructed.
Therefore, it is important for you as a developer to emphasize
the necessity of compliance with these approved plans and to
discourage rather than encourage any deviations without receiving
prior written approval from the -City.
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
ROD HARDY
DECEMBER 4, 1987
PAGE TWO
The requested deviation from the approved grading plan and the
issue of construction initiation prior to permit issuance will be
presented to the City Council at their meeting on Thursday,
December 17 for discussion and direction. You and any other
personnel associated with your development are encouraged to
attend this meeting to help ensure that all involved personnel
understand the flexibility and latitude associated with
conformance to your subdivision's development.
Sincerely,
'homas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
TAC/mc
cc: Jim Hill, James F
Tim Jaywar, Burr
Thomas L. Hedges,
Doug Reid, Chief
1. Hill, Inc.
Oak Builders
City Administrator
Building Official
0
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
There are six (6) items on the agenda referred to as consent items
requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council
wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items
should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under
Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
A. PERSONNEL ITEMS:
Item 1. Police Officers --Effective January 1, 1988, the Police
Department is authorized to hire two new Police Officers for the
1988 budget. Chief of Police Berthe is recommending that the two
present Community Service Officers employed by the City be approved
for hiring as Police Officers. The hiring of Steven Anselment would
be effective January 4, 1988 and the hiring of Joseph Marshall would
be effective January 5, 1988. Both are currently eligible to be
licensed under the Police Officer's Standards and Training Board.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Steven Anselment (effective January 4, 1988) and Joseph Marshall
(effective January 5, 1988) as Police Officers for the City of
Eagan.
Item 2. Community Service Officer --If the hirings of Steven
Anselment and Joseph Marshall are approved per the preceding
personnel item, two vacancies will exist for CSO's with the City of
Eagan. It is the recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe, Captains
Aszmann and Geagan, and Administrative Assistant Duffy that
Stephanie Maczko be hired as a Community Service Officer for the
City of Eagan effective December 28, 1987, subject to successful
completion of the City's psychological and physical testing
requirement. The December 28, 1987 date is recommended because it
would enable Ms. Maczko to receive one week's training prior to the
transfer of the present LSO's to Police Officers. The hiring
process for the second CSO has begun and it is expected that a name
will be presented to the Council for approval sometime in January'.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Stephanie Maczko as a Community Service Officer for the City of
Eagan, effective December 28, 1987, subject to successful completion
of the City's psychological and physical testing requirements.
Item 3. Seasonal Winter Recreation Staff Positions --After
interviews, Recreation Supervisors Peterson and Nowariak are
recommending that the following persons be hired for seasonal
positions at the skating rink sites and at the sliding hill site.
/D
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
Returning Staff
John Von Bank
David A. Carney
Kevin D. Duffy
Timothy J. Gill
Brent D. Tait (effective 1-1-88)
Greg T. Ellingson
Robbie L. DeRosier
Robert H. Merrill
Rebecca A. Latzke
Gina K. Penn
Brent R. Eichten (effective 1-1-88)
Matthew P. Dow
Adam R. Wortman
Thomas C. McNurlin
New Staff
John McShane
Michelle L. Hansen
Dana J. Iffert
Gary M. Rutherford
Tam W. Wise
Jeffrey R. Olson
Michael J. Mooney
Katherine K. Roche
Renee L. Menzel
Amy L. Tarmann
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
winter seasonal staff as recommended.
Stephen J. Cramer
.Robert J. Kerry
John M. Tracy
Jason T. Wandersee
Sean A. Flaherty
Michael P. Geere
Bradley R. Czubernat
Robert L. Schroeder
Kevin Lazachic
To approve the hiring of the
Agenda
Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
APPROVE FINAL PLAT, CRAY ADDITION
B. Approve Final Plat, Cray Addition --Staff has received an
application for final plat approval for the Cray Addition located
north of Lone Oak Road and south of the Northwest Airlines Corporate
Headquarters as shown by the plat contained on page% All
conditions of the preliminary plat approval of June 16, 1987 have
been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application
materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in
order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for
the Cray Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
all related documents.
CRAY ADDITION
L3
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
APPROVE FINAL PLAT, WOODLANDS ADDITION
C. Approve Final Plat, Woodlands Addition --We have received an
application for final plat approval for the Woodlands Addition
located north of Wescott Road and west oft,heSouth Hills Addition
as shown by the plat contained on page . You will note that
not all of the lots have been platted due to a boundary description
discrepancy with the common lot line adjacent to the South Hills
Addition. Subsequently, this has been platted as an outlot to be
replatted once the final descriptions have been resolved. All
conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval of March 17, 1987
have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application
materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in
order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for
the Woodlands Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute all related documents.
IA
'• � moi•' \,,16
LA
o
�\��r �—�—f �;L y ._!, �_�• � — —.. .:... fir/
L.? ,:i
Lh
�•► - i \ D
CO
VZ
•I � \ -� , off',,\ �` \ ,
•' .,c L•� •• I I �.JI an. j7J..r Ts=-
•/ i � t f� lr � i - f 'I
IL
..�•:.=�� .. N[scorr�-_ —:� .,." w.o NLSLa>'r:...,f.
V
Agenda Information Memo,
December_ 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
PROJECT 529, RECEIVE PETITIONS/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPPORT &
DETAILED PLANS (CLIFF LAKE GALLERIA - STREETS & UTILITIES)
D. Project 529, Receive Petitions/Order Feasibility Report and
Detailed Plans (Cliff Lake Galleria - Streets and Utilities) --Staff
has received a petition from the developers of the proposed Cliff
Lake Galleria development for the installation of streets and
utilities necessary to service that subdivision. A petition
guarantees all cost incurred by the City for the preparation of a
feasibility report and the simultaneous preparation of detailed
plans and specifications if for some reason the project is not
approved as a result of the required public hearing process.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and
authorize the feasibility report for Project 529 (Cliff Lake
Galleria - Streets and Utilities) along with detailed plans and
specifications.
PROJECT 528, RECEIVE PETIT
EAGANDALE
INDUSTRIAL PARK
ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT
ADDITION STREETS & UTILITIES)
E. Project 528, Receive Petitions/Order Feasibility Report
(Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th Addition - Streets and
Utilities) --The staff has received a petition for the preparation of
a feasibility report regarding the installation of streets and
utilities to service the proposed development located in the
southwest corner of Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue. The
petition guarantees the cost of the preparation of this feasibility
report if for some reason the project is not approved as a result of
the public hearing process.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS
authorize the preparation of a
(Eagandale Center Industrial
Utilities).
16
ITEM: To receive the petition and
feasibility report for Project 528
Park 9th Addition - Streets and
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
APPROVE FINAL PLAT, SUNRISE ADDITION
F. Approve Final Plat, Sunrise Addition --The staff has received an
application for final plat approval for the Sunrise Addition located
north of Wescott Road surrounding the new Wo dlands Elementary
School as shown by the plat enclosed on page . All conditions
of the preliminary plat approval of March 17, 1987 have been
satisfactorily complied with. The single family lots surrounding
the only cul-de-sac within this subdivision have been platted as
outlots to preclude their development until such time that the soil
contamination regarding the Williams Brothers Pipeline issue has
been satisfactorily tested. These outlots will then be replatted
into future additions of the Sunrise Hills development at a later
date. All final plat application materials have been submitted,
reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council
action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for
the Sunrise Hills Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute all related documents.
/I
J
E
Agenda Information Memo
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
OLD BUS.LNESS
RATIFICATION/1988 GENERAL FUND AND UTILITY BUDGET
A. Final Ratification, 1988 General Fund Operating Public Utilities
Budget --At the November 23, 1987 Special City Council meeting, the
final revised 1988 General Fund Budget was examined and established
at $8,652,100. At that same meeting the proposed operating budget
for the Water Utility is $1,465,600 and Sewer Utility is $1,629,380.
The City Council has held several budget workshop sessions in
August/September, a public hearing on September 15, mill rate/levy
certification at the October 6 City Council meeting and a special
City Council meeting to finalize all the budget work on November 23.
The budget is in order for final ratification. Once final action is
taken, the budget documents will be printed and distributed for use
in early January, 1988.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To ratify the 1988 General
Fund and Public Utilities Operating Budgets as presented.
WAIVER OF PLAT/POND VIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
B. Waiver of Plat for Pond View Planned Development, TXI, Inc., to
Combine Four Existing Parcels into Two Separate Parcels --A public
hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their
regular meeting held on October 27, 1987 to consider an application
submitted by TXI, Inc. for a waiver of plat to combine four existing
parcels into two separate parcels as a part of the Pond View Planned
Development. The APC recommended approval. At the request of the
developer, this item was continued from the November 5, 1987 meeting
until December I. At the December 1 City Council meeting, there was
a question raised regarding several conditions that need to be
addressed between the Meritor Development Company and TXI, Inc.
Therefore, the matter was continued until the December 17 meeting
with an understanding that the Planning Department would work with
both parties to achieve a common resolution of conditions.
Enclosed on pages 02ka0's a memo from Director of Public Works
Colbert that outlines the conditions as they pertain to the waiver
of plat for the Pond View Planned Development.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a waiver
of plat for Pond View Planned Development as presented with certain
conditions.
/17
MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: DECEMBER 11, 1987
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT, TXI, INCORPORATED
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
At the December 1 Council meeting, the City Council continued
consideration of the waiver of plat for the above referenced
applicant to resolve the following issues:
1. Redraft of the description to eliminate the land locked parcels
and create only two parcels for this waiver.
2. To allow the execution of the appropriate street right-of-way,
ponding and utility easements.
3. The preparation of specific conditions of approval.
Enclosed on page * is a copy of the revised waiver of plat
showing the acceptable configuration of the newly created parcels.
Appropriate street right-of-way and ponding/utility easement
dedication documents have been prepared by the City and forwarded to
Mr. Kevin Ellis, representing the applicant, on December 11. It is
anticipated that these documents will be executed and returned to
the City prior to the December 17 City Council meeting.
Past staff reports reviewed the current assessment status for the
property involved in this waiver of plat and determined that, based
on the revised description most recently submitted, there are
outstanding future assessment obligations of $18,350 for the
northern parcel (TXI, Inc.) and $14,575 for the southern parcel
(Meritor Inc.). Based on concerns expressed by the applicant at the
December 1 meeting, the City Council agreed to postpone the
collection of these future assessments until such time as future
platting, development and/or building permit application is made.
Therefore, the previous staff condition regarding these outstanding
additional future assessments can be removed from consideration of
approval. However, the following conditions should be complied with
as a condition of approval:
1. The property owner shall dedicate the necessary permanent
right-of-way and temporary slope easements for the proposed
Pilot Knob Road improvements and the storm water utility and
ponding easements as defined by staff. These documents must be
executed prior to the release of the resolution of approval for
the requested waiver of plat.
* The revised plat will be distributed with the Administrative
Agenda. 112O
Waiver of Plat, TXI, Inc.
December 11, 1987
Page Two
2. This waiver shall be described to contain only two parcels each
of which must have adequate access to public right-of-way.
3. This waiver of plat shall be subject to all applicable City
ordinances.
Your assistance in helping to insure that these conditions are
properly addressed and complied with in the consideration of this
waiver of plat will be appreciated. Please let me know if any
additional information or clarification is necessary.
Director of Public Works y
CC: Dale Runkle, City Planner
Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer
TAC/ jeh
Agenda Information Memo
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
CONSIDERATION OF EAW AND STREET ALIGNMENT
CLIFF LAKE GALLERIA AND TOWERS
C. Consideration of EAW and Street Alignment for Phase I/Cliff Lake
Galleria and Towers Project --At the December 1, 1987 City Council
meeting, approval was given to the Cliff Lake Galleria and Towers
preliminary plat for phase 1 of that development project. As a part
of this proposed development an Environmental Assessment Worksheet
was required which has been processed through the various state
agencies. The first EAW filed earlier this fall took into
consideration this project as it was originally described in the
first application. Once the developers changed the location of the
project to conform with the planned unit development zoning, it was
necessary to amend the EAW which has required additional review by
several state agencies. Letters will be received from varying State
agencies on either Friday, December 11 or Monday, December 14
regarding the EAW. Once these letters are reviewed, a staff memo
will be prepared and distributed for City Council review as a part
of the Administrative Agenda.
The final street alignment will be presented for Council review to
allow the developer and City staff to prepare the final plat and
development agreement based on a specific design. Plans are to be
finalized by Monday, December 14, then reviewed by staff and
distributed as a part of the Administrative Packet on Wednesday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny either
1) a negative declaration for the EAW or 2) a positive declaration
which would require an Environmental Impact Statement and 3) to
approve or modify the final street alignment for Phase I of the
Cliff Lake Galleria project.
z/
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
RECOMMENDATION SOLID WASTE RECYLING FACILITY
A. Recommendation for Solid Waste Abatement Commission Recycling
Facility --Pursuant to Council direction that the Solid Waste
Abatement Commission move forward in attempting to develop a
recycling drop off facility in the City of Eagan. Under the
Solid Waste Abatement strategy statement approved by the Council
in October, the Commission recommends acceptance of a proposal by
Minnesota Soft Drink Recycle to develop and operate a recycling
redemption center at 1971 Seneca Road near Highway 13.
Enclosed on pages through 30 you will find a memo from
Administrative Assistant Hohenstein outlining the details of the
MSD proposal and a competitive proposal by Goodwill Industries.
Under the proposal, MSD will redeem aluminum, steel, glass and
plastic and will accept newsprint.
MSD offered the least expensive of the alternatives reviewed by
the Commission. Under the proposal, MSD requests assistance in
the purchase of a piece of capital equipment to be used in a
facility at a cost of $4,000 per year for the next three years.
Funds to cover this amount are anticipated to be available from
the Dakota County Landfill Abatement Fund as long as the obliga-
tion would exist. The firm also requests that the City assist in
promoting the facility through its newsletter and other means,
that it assist in the provision of adequate signage for the site
and that the City pass through the $4.00 per ton recyclable.
rebate as long as such a program is available through Dakota
County.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the Minnesota
Soft Drink (MSD) Redemption Center proposal and to direct staff
to negotiate conditions including a cost not to exceed $4,000 per
year for the next three years for capital equipment.
ZZ^
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Administrator Hedges
FROM: Administrative Assistant Hohenstein
DATE: December 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Solid Waste Abatement Commission Recycling Proposal
Recommendation
In action taken at its meeting of Tuesday, December 8, the Eagan
Solid Waste Commission recommended approval of a proposal by
Minnesota Soft Drink (MSD) Recycle to provide a recycling
redemption center to be located at 1971 Seneca Road. In making
this recommendation the commission received and compared
proposals from both MSD and Goodwill Industries.
Under MSD's proposal, the firm will develop and operate a
recycling center in a 3000 square foot leased facility in the
Cedar Industrial Park. The facility is intended to be a model
for a new generation of recycling centers planned by MSD in which
densification and packaging occur on-site to reduce
transportation costs to improve the operating margin of such
businesses. MSD will redeem aluminum and steel beverage cans,
glass, plastic P.E.T. containers and aluminum foil. The facility
will also accept newsprint, but will not redeem it. In its first
year of operation, MSD expects to collect approximately 300 tons
of these recyclables. By the third year of operation, it is
expected that about 500 tons can be processed.
Under the proposal, MSD has requested that the City of Eagan:
1. Assume the cost of a CP -3000 Densifier which will
reduce and compact beverage cans and other materials.
The cost of this equipment is $12,000 to be spread over
three years. The City currently has budgeted $4,000
for such a purpose in its Dakota County landfill
abatement application. The County Landfill Abatement
Fund is anticipated to be available for such a purpose
for the next three years.
2. Promote the facility through the city newsletter, local
access television, waste abatement flyers, etc.
3. Assist in the approval and provision of adequate
signage, including a request for possible MNDOT signage
on Highway 13.
4. Pass through the $4.00 per ton rebate for recyclables
to be administered by Dakota County. The City has made
such a pass-through available to other church and non-
profit recycling programs in the past.
In its action, the Commission accepted all of the conditions with
direction to staff to negotiate a cost not to exceed $4,000 per
year for assistance with the capital equipment.
The Commission also considered a proposal from Goodwill
Industries which would provide for a Goodwill Recycling attended
donation center trailer similar to those in Burnsville and Apple
Valley at a site to be negotiated in the City. The trailer would
be monitored eight hours a day, seven days a week. It would
accept aluminum, newsprint and glass as well as the household
M
goods which Goodwill has traditionally accepted. Goodwill
requested of the City an operating subsidy of $22,131 per year
and capital cost participation of $5,371 per year for the first
three years.
Currently, MSD and Goodwill are the principal providers of
recycling services in the Metropolitan Area. It is the
Commission's position that it is in the best interest of the City
to implement one of these two provider's programs rather than
begin an exhaustive search for additional alternatives or attempt
to develop a City program at a relatively high public cost. It
is anticipated that a City program of similar service level would
cost as much as, if not more than, the Goodwill proposal.
Despite the fact that MSD has not proposed to accept household
goods, its broader range of accepted recyclables, redemption of
certain recyclables and lower public cost were reasons for the
Commission decision. If you have further questions in this
regard, please let me know.
Ad nistrative Assistant
Z�
Hillsborough Office Bldg, • 2353 Rice Street No. 0 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 + (612) 483-8815
December 1, 1987
City of Eagan
Jon Hohenstein
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55112
Dear Jon,
Enclosed is the additional information which you have requested. Volume projections
which you have received are based on an annual average experienced by MSD Recycle
redemption center in the past. This average yearly recovery rate will differ from
the first year's volume and expenses. The first year is a building year for the
Eagan community. To acheive appropriate consumer participation, MSD Recycle and
the City of Eagan will need to educate the resident on the benefits of recycling
and have creative promotions to add greater incentives for recycling. MSD Recycle
will increase the advertising budget to meet the first year needs by $4,000.00.
First year projected volume and
revenue:
Aluminum
144,000
lbs.
$28,800.00
Steel
108,000
lbs.
4,320.00
Glass
144,000
lbs.
1,440.00
Foil
Newsprint 1" 4
2,160
180,000
lbs.
108.00
lbs.
1,350.00
TOTAL
578,160
lbs.
elm
$36,018.00
First year expenses:
Wages & Benefits
$13,200.00
FICA
880.00
Rent
13,230.00
Utilities
2,400.00
Telephone
720.00
Workers Compensation
2,500.00
Insurance
300.00
Processing Equipment R/M
1,200.00
Rental Equipment
600.00
Depreciation
4,020.00 ✓
Supplies
1,200.00
Advertising
5,000.00 ✓
Miscellaneous
600.00
`► TOTAL First Year Operating Expense
$45,850.00
Profit/Loss $(9,832.00)
Jon Hohenstein
December 1, 1987
Page Two
As the participation increases in the following years so will the volume
which in turn will increase revenues and produce a profit.
Jon, I also wanted to note that I met with Larry Knutson last week. We ex-
changed our programs and possibilities of future ideas. I look forward to working
with Larry, as well as other community organizations interested or actively working
in recycling. Larry and I realize there are alternatives available to landfilling
and together in exchanging ideas, we can best achieve better solutions for recycling.
Please let me know if there is other information necessary for your Solid Waste
Abatement Commission meeting. We would like to attend the meeting on December 8,
1987, and look forward to your reply.
Yours truly,
Peggy ney Wander
Manager of Development and Promotion
PTW/lib
cc: David Locey
Del Dibilzen
9
mi
Hillsborough Office Bldg. 0 2353 Rice Street No. a Roseville, Minnesota 55113 * (612) 483-8815
November 9, 1987
`'City of Eagan
John Hohenstein
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55112
Minnesota Soft Drink Recycle is committed to recycling and is
eager to start a comprehensive recycling program in Eagan. We
have sought out a location which we feel is feasible to meet
both community and MSD Recycle needs.
John, hopefully this information will
tation before the City Council.
yts, MSD Recycle proposed Eagan redemption
1971 Seneca Road.
Wa,5,,e & Benefits
FICA
Rent
Utilities
Telephone : 7 - - - _ 00
x ,r Workers Compensation 2,500 00 ,
I
• .:.::..: °..
nsLAI ance. :......_ : .
Processing Equipment R/M
1,200.00
Rental Equipment
Depreciation
600.'00:
335 00
Supplies
900.00
Advertising'
1,000.00
Miscellaneous
600.00
Total Annual Operating Expense
$37,865.
Capital Equipment:
Separator
$ 2,000.00
Densifier
.12,000.00
Glass Crusher
' 72,500.00
Gaylord Boxes
-
Scale
�1.
awl
Total Capitol Cost
300.00
1,200.00
,..�..
600.'00:
335 00
900.00
1,000.00
V
600.00
$37,865.
. • ���'
$ 2,000.00
'
.12,000.00
' 72,500.00
_
_120.00
3,500.00
$20,120.00
City of Eagan
Page 2
11/9/87
.fo,J s 4
240,000 lbs. 120 48,00
180, 000 lbs. qo 7,zc
240,000 lbs. Izd Z,qo
3,600 lbs. - 4% �$
300,000 lbs. 156 =Zzs
963,600 lbs, w6,G3e
MSD RECYCLE EXPECTATIONS OR CITY OPTIONS
1. Equipment cost of densifier amortized over 3 years. This
would calculate to $4,000 per year. Ownership would be
worked out.
2. Work with the city to promote the recycling program effectively
using city newsletter, cable T.V., etc..
3. Work with the city in obtaining proper visual signage.
4. Receive waste abatement money of $4 per ton from the county..
MSD Recycle would receive $1,928.00 based on 482 ton
collected. +;
We hope this will be helpful in consideration of our proposal.
If there are any -questions in regard to this proposal, please
call our office and we -will answer your questions.
Yo rs truly,
Pe Tane
g Y
cc: Dave Locey -MSD Recycle
-Del Dibilzen-Coca Cola
1 ��
P �
,s,�3
Pounds Collected (Projected)
go 01.
Aluminum
20,000
per
month
12
Steel
15,000
per
month
y
Glass
.20,000
per
month
Foil
300
per
month
Y
Newsprint
25,000
per
month
Total Annual Pounds Collected
.fo,J s 4
240,000 lbs. 120 48,00
180, 000 lbs. qo 7,zc
240,000 lbs. Izd Z,qo
3,600 lbs. - 4% �$
300,000 lbs. 156 =Zzs
963,600 lbs, w6,G3e
MSD RECYCLE EXPECTATIONS OR CITY OPTIONS
1. Equipment cost of densifier amortized over 3 years. This
would calculate to $4,000 per year. Ownership would be
worked out.
2. Work with the city to promote the recycling program effectively
using city newsletter, cable T.V., etc..
3. Work with the city in obtaining proper visual signage.
4. Receive waste abatement money of $4 per ton from the county..
MSD Recycle would receive $1,928.00 based on 482 ton
collected. +;
We hope this will be helpful in consideration of our proposal.
If there are any -questions in regard to this proposal, please
call our office and we -will answer your questions.
Yo rs truly,
Pe Tane
g Y
cc: Dave Locey -MSD Recycle
-Del Dibilzen-Coca Cola
1 ��
cyt:
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, INC.
EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF MINNESOTA
December 3, 1987
Jon Hohenstein
City of Eagan
P.O. Box 21199
Eagan, MN 55121
Dear Jon:
I understand the Solid Waste Abatement Commission is prepared to
consider proposals for recyclable drop off centers. It is
encouraging to see the body I addressed in October of 1986 ready
to take action.
Goodwill/Easter Seal is indeed interested in working with the
City of Eagan to set up a recycling center. I've attached an
updated proposal and will be available to make a presentation to the
Commission if needed.
I would like to point out that our yearly contract is $22 1 0
for the center that would be open seven days a week, eight hours
per day, 365 days per year. The cost of the capital equipment,
in your proposal, is spread over three
years. The total issue
of payment for equipment is negotiable. It is our goal to have
the city cover costs that are appropriate and be competetive.
We have negotiated this same contract with all of our cities and
they have or are in the process of signing the second year
contract. They have all purchased the equipment.
I would like to emphasize that this is a turn key operation. We
welcome your contact with any City Manager currently in our
program. It is our goal to provide comprehensive recycling ser-
vice meeting community needs. If this means working with other
providers of service to fashion the best plan for Eagan, we are ,
more than willing to do so. ►...{
Thank you for considering our Attended Donation System and look
forward to your decision.
Del Edwards
Partners in Progress
tg Z9
2543 Como Avenue
St Paul, Minnesota
55108-1298
(612) 646-2591
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
LaVerne Armbruster
Margaret Arnold
Roger W. Berg
Robert H. Bratnober
Jacqueline A Bronson
David D. Gross
Kermit W. Heiden
James R. Hartzell
William W. Helms
James R. Jensen
Phillip D. Klone
Norman E. Lidke
Anne T. Ousdigian
Jan Prazak
Orem O. Robbins
/OFFICERS
David D. Gross
Chairman of the Board
Jan Prazak
Vice Chairman
James R. Jensen
Vice Chairman
Jacqueline A Bronson
Secretary
Phillip D. Klone
Treasurer
Norman E. Lidke
Chaplain
James A Dreiling
President
Accredited by the
Commission on Accreditation
o/ Rehabilitation Facilities
Remember Goodwill -Easter Seals
in your will
ANNUAL COSTS
Operational
Public Relations
899.00
Propane Gas
200.00
Preventative MX
400.00
Scaling $10 x 52
520.00
Forms, Office Equipment
100.00
Management
10 - #1 DT Jumbo
$8.55 x 140 hours
1,365.00
Dispatch
-
$9.19 x 130 hours
1,362.00
Attendant
$4.75 x 2920 hours
15,812.00
May, June, July, Aug.,
Sept.
$4.75 x 272 hours
1,473.00
TOTALS
22,131.00
On time expenditure
Capital
depreciation 3 yrs.
10,0
2 - 40' trailers
400
1 - 5 tier steps
1,800
2 - Heaters
900
8 - #20 Duratainers
2,114
10 - #1 DT Jumbo
200
Freight
15,514 - 3 = 5,171
Annual Cost to be recovered
22,131.00
5,371.00
2M;72.00 - 12 = $2,276 per month
C21 so(.
Collections of 480 tons per year at a cost of:
27,402 - 480 = $56 t8 per ton
ST,
JK/2
Agenda Information Memo,
December_ 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
JOINT CABLE COMMISSION BUDGET
B. Consideration of Joint Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission
Budget --With the departure of Ralph Campbell as Cable Administrator,
the Cities of Eagan and Burnsville designated their administrative
assistants to staff the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission. A major
staff function this past fall was further development of the 1988
cable budget. There were a number of cable revenue and expenditure
questions, ambiguities as to the policies governing the cable
budget, cable expenditure accounting and the use of franchise fees,
all of which have been examined by the Joint Commission and City
Councils.
The 1988 cable budget is similar to the budgeting/accounting
priorities set forth in the two (2) cities for other accounting
standards. There were a number of issues examined throughout the
budget process, with special meetings held with the presence of the
Burnsville City Manager, Eagan City Administrator, Commission
Chairman Paul Wood, Mayor Dan McElroy, and City Councilmember Jim
Smith. As a result, the form of the cable budget has been
drastically modified. There are basically two (2) budgets being
recommended: one for the Cable Commission, which supports its
activities, and the second is entitled "Local Programming" and would
cover expected expenditures for this proposed operation. These
budgets were proposed on a needs basis and, as joint expenditures of
the two cities, would be funded by equal contributions.
The staff has recommended that the residue of the franchise fee
stream not used for these two jointly fund budgets be directed back
to the member cities for their individual cable -related expenditures
(e.g. cable -ready City Council Chambers). These funds would be
retained in trust accounts by the cities. Unspent monies from prior
years would also be retained by the cities for their individual use
in these trust accounts.
For background information and a copy of the budget as seen by the
City Council at the November 23 meeting, refer to pages .3Z_
through The only modification which will appear in the
finalized budget is a $200 expenditure for magazine subscriptions.
The Burnsville City Council has met and discussed two areas of
concern which are reviewed in the memo on pages throughf4
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the
proposed cable budget for 1988 as presented with or without
modification.
.5l
1 *_
For Discussic—, F°.,..,;�.,,.
PROPOSED CABLE BUDGET AND
IMPLEMENTATION - POLICY ASSUMPTIONS
1. Franchise fees should only be used for cable -related expenses.
2. The city councils will be the final authority for the definition
of "cable -related expenses" and how franchise fees will be spent.
3. To carry out the purposes of the joint powers agreement, the
activities of the Cable Commission will be supported by adequate
budget appropriations from the franchise fees. For administrative
ease, this appropriation should continue to be shared on a 500 -
50o basis by the member cities.
4. In anticipation of future policy decisions and in recognition of its
unique subject matter, Local Programming expenditures should be dis-
tinguished from Cable Commission support expenditures and be separ-
ately listed in another budget. Pending.future policy decisions by.
the city councils, implementation and oversight of this budget would
remain the responsibility of the Cable Commission. For administra-
tive ease, this budget appropriation.should continue to be shared on
a 500 - 50% basin by the member cities.
5.- Franchise fees not allocated to the joint funding of Cable Commission
or Local Programming budgets should be retained by the member cities
in trust accounts. The member cities could spend these retained
franchise fees on cable -related expenses that are of -primary use/
benefit to each member city. Furthermore, cable -related property and
equipment that is for the primary use/benefit of one member city
should.be owned, insured, accounted, maintained, and replaced through
that city's accounting and budgeting system.
6. The Cable Commission and Local Programming budgets should be prepared
by methods and in a format that are consistent with the practices of
the two member cities. To that end, the cable administrator/staff
member, (with the input and consultation of the Cable Commission),
should prepare need -based budgets that are submitted for review/
approval to .the city manager/administrator and city councils in the
same time frame and in the same manner as all other proposed depart-
mental budgets.
7. When preparing need -based Cable Commission and Local Programming
budgets, dollar amounts included for contingencies/reserve funds
should be consistent with the practices of the member cities.
Similarly, contingency/reserve funds should not be spent as a line
item but instead, saved for emergency purposes, consistent with the
standards and practices of the member cities. Furthermore, the member
cities should be aware that special circumstances may arise that
necessitate additional appropriations in support of Cable Commission
or Local Programming functions and services.
7-
DI�E�: :
For D -(;.^.USCI^ 1 !'.�'•'�
S. With the councils' approval of the Cable Commission and Local
Programming budgets, the cities should fully fund the budgets at
the beginning of the budget year and rely upon the Cable Commission
to review and approve expenditure items that are consistent with
the budgets. To bring better consistency with the practices of the
two cities, the preparation and payment of expenditures should be
processed through the city of Eagan's accounting system and be sub-
ject to its standards and procedures.
33
Draf t
CABLE COMMISSION BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
18.200 PERSONAL SERVICES
$ 11,000 Admin. Salary (1/3 of total - balance in local
programming budget) ( Line 20 )
3,300 Admin. Benefits (1/3 of total) (Paht-Line 22 )
3,000 City/Staff support wages (1/3 of total) WaAt-Line 21 )
900 City/Staff support benefits (1/3 of total) (PaAt-Line 22)
$ 35,650 OTHER CURRENT EXPENSES
$ 1,600 Office supplies (Linen 26, 38)
15,000 Professional Services
$ 7,500 Legal (Line 29) (Linen 200-233)
- 2,000 Audit: General and Franchise Fees (Lane 32 9
3,000 Planning Facilitation (Line 33) PgAt oA Lane 30
2,500 Other (PaAt_Line 30)
750 Communication - postage/ telephone (Line 37)
50 Advertising/publish (none)
9,150 Insurance
- $
4,000 Liability insurance ( Line 34 )
5, 000 Deductible for single occurrence (Line.5127-155 )
150 Bond (Line 31 )
6,100 Travel, Schools, Conferences,: Meetiags
Expenses (i.e., tuition/fees, travel,
lodging, meals)
$ 200 mileage/parking (Line 23 )
* -
5,400 conferences (Line 40 )
500 meeting expenses (Line 36)
*
2,400 Board Member Cable Service ( Line 35 )
600 Membership dues (Lane 39)
$ 300 CAPITAL OUTLAY
$ 300 Office furniture and equipment (Line 52)
$ 15,750 DEBT SERVICE
$ 15,750 repayment of advanced Franchise Fees (Line 57)
3,500 RESERVE CONTINGENCIES
$ 73,400 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
3�-
.. .... «_.w.,. ....,. ..—� �. ... ......... ,'..�:'ir... �':F:` ..r .. .... .�w�.";.wri=Mei'Z!4Ja:<i��.:�i'fi�.-S°A'....��...�_..... ...• .a ..... s.e..a ..
11/9/87
Draft
LOCAL PROGRAMMING BUDGET
EXPENDITURES
36,400 PERSONAL SERVICES
$ 22,000 Administrative Salary (2/3 of total - balance in Cable
Commission budget ) (Lane 20)
6,600 Administrative Benefits (2/3 of total) (Line 22)
6,000 City/Staff Support wages (2/3 of total) (Line 211
1,800 City/Staff Support benefits (2/3 of total) (Line 22)
$ 49,100 OTHER CURRENT EXPENSES
$ 500 Tapes (Line 93)
23,000 Professional Services
- $ 7,500 Legal (Line 110 and Linez 200-233)
- 13,000 Promotion/Advertising (Line 111)
- 2,500 Other (New)
50 Legal Advertising/Notices (New)
5,000 Insurance (New)
5,000 Travel, Schools, Conferences, Meeting Expenses
$ 400 Mileage/parking (Line 23)
* -
3,600 Conferences (Line 40)
1,000 Meeting expenses (Line 109)
150 Membership dues (Line 39)
300 Videotape duplication (Line 96)
5,000 Production labor -municipal programming ( Line 92 )
100 Publications (Line 108)
10,000 Local Programming Grants/ Subsidies (Line 89)
$ 0 CAPITAL OUTLAY
$ 0 DEBT SERVICE
4,300 RESERVE/CONTINGENCIES
89,800 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
City of
BURNSVILLE MEMO
DATE: December 8, 1987
TO: Burnsville -Eagan Cable Commission
FROM: Staff
SUBJECT: PROPOSED 1988 BUDGET(S) - AREAS OF CONCERN TO
BURNSVILLE CITY COUNCIL
The Burnsville City Council reviewed and discussed the
staff proposals for 1988 Cable Budgets. The following
modifications were requested:
1. TRAVEL, SCHOOLS, CONFERENCES
The Council suggests attendance at state conferences
and seminars for all Commission members. However,
they felt that attendance at national conferences
should be limited to a Staff member and one Commission
member.
Implementation of this policy direction has the following
consequence:
a. The line item for "conference" in the Cable
Commission Budget would be reduced from $5,400
to $3,925. The line item, (as per Ralph's
rationale), would include eleven participants
at the MACTA Annual Conference at a cost of
$150 per participant, ($1,650); eleven participants
at the MACTA Fall Conference at a cost of $25 per
participant, ($275); and two participants at the
NATOA Annual Conference at a cost of $1,000 per
participant, ($2,000).
b. The line item for "conferences" in the Local
Programming Budget would be reduced from $3,600
to $1,800. The line item, (as per Ralph's
rationale), would include two participants at
the NFLCP Annual Conference at a cost of $900
per participant.
2. BOARD MEMBER SUBSCRIPTIONS
The Council was initially confused by the name for
this line item. Therefore, Staff proposes to call
this line "Board Member Cable Service" to accurately
and clearly convey the intent of this expenditure.
_56
December 8, 1987 Page 2
PROPOSED 1988 BUDGET(S) - AREAS OF CONCERN TO
BURNSVILLE CITY COUNCIL
The Burnsville Council expressed reservations about
subsidizing any of the Commission members' service
charges. Based on that philosophy, this line item
would go from $2,400 in the Cable Commission Budget
to $0.
Staff intends to suggest a compromise position whereby
the basic service, but no premium service, of Commission
members would be funded. The rationale is that
Commissioners will then monitor the local programming
efforts and that premium services require no monitoring;
that the market place will 'weed out' poor premium
services. This compromise will be suggested to the
Eagan and Burnsville City Councils.
37
co
\
rn
\
r -I
---aaauna x�zn�zor---
bo
°rI E �
.n w y w w
rl 0 :+ =S
•rl I rI 'O ra tJ bO a.)
> >� •ri •11 E •rl O •rl
C C N •r�1 N U C O P+ C O
N C 0..0 C w� w O
u w~ 97 u W Oc
44 < 'O w ca v} O 00
O w 4 44 U tJ a +J CO-
414J
rtJu 0 w w
Lo ro 00 to CO bO
tJ O —4 >•+ w co 'C3 co ra
O
•,I p w O ON W
U H PG 44 a '4 90
)to
\ h�
Ln
M
0
yr
w M
w m M
W w
w r. 0000
cn w r-1
,1 > v,
U C4 i.
C 'O
RS r` w
is co L
Cza CT fd
r•i �
+� O N
O p w
Hv.4—
u
w
N
►d r1
co
W
I iJ O
H
w -4 'L3
1�
r -I b •rl
C
p C >
c0
ca
w w •11
C
b0
U a •d
r,1
b
X C
bO
.0
c+1
00
w
W
aJ r7 w
44
O
C w .0
44
C aJ IJ
O
>1
O c0
aJ
u rl w
w
rl
U w O
y
U
-�4 P4 w
O
w M
w m M
W w
w r. 0000
cn w r-1
,1 > v,
U C4 i.
C 'O
RS r` w
is co L
Cza CT fd
r•i �
+� O N
O p w
Hv.4—
1-
OD
1�
N
O
c0
O
04
.0
c+1
00
v1
M
44
M
N
v1
l4
f?
l/}
cu
n
U
00
$4
w 00
C
w C OO
w rn
w C OO
w rn
to
a Orn
P. r.
04rn
a0r4
bO
—1 r4
O \
•r1 r 1
O —
�
I •r1 r I
I aJ \
I •r1 r-
w
cd O
aJ M
cU O
a.) M
2 Q
to. i M
N to \
0 r -I M
N cb
�O
w=1\
w E N
w z\
w E N
Y1
w u
w •rl .-1
w u
w •r1 r -I
v
W —4
W aJ^
W 4
W 4.1
c0 1
cA I
I
to I
w�
wU
ww
ae
wv
ww
,a
•rl >1 W
•rl >I 00
.7
•r1 >, 00
vi >, O
>
U cC —4
u co 1-1u
c0 'A
u b r -I
a a\
P: a\
G u.\
4
C a\
b r
w O\
al E, I
w O\
C7
M E,
Sc O\
co E r4
Ia O
W U ri
W V crl
W
W V r -I
W V til
w M
w m M
W w
w r. 0000
cn w r-1
,1 > v,
U C4 i.
C 'O
RS r` w
is co L
Cza CT fd
r•i �
+� O N
O p w
Hv.4—
PROPOSED BUDGET PROCESS
STEP 1 - Calculate Revenues
- Estimate year-end carryovers, (if any), from current year Cable
Commission and Local Programming budgets
- Receive estimate from company of current year franchise fees
- Estimate other funding sources, (e.g., grants, donations, company
subsidies,solicitations)
STEP 2 - Propose joint cable related expenditures
- Cable Commission budget. With input/consultation of Commission,
the cable administrator/staff member will prepare a need -based budget
for the operation/support of the Cable Commission. As a general
rule, the proposed expenditure should be of mutual benefit to -the
two cities.. Format and preparation timing should be consistent with
the processes of the two cities. Size/scope of budget will vary
with role/activity level of Commission.
- Local Programming budget. With input/consultation of Commission or
other appropriate entity, Cable administrator/staff member will
prepare a need -based budget for the operation/subsidy of the local
programming/public access effort. Size/scope will depend on major
policy decisions regarding cities' support/assistance/involvement;
and consequences of possible divestment of this function by Cable
Company.
STEP 3 - Propose cable related expenditures for the -primary benefit
of .a single member Citi
- Each city identifies cable related expenditures of primary benefit
only to itself. Upon request, the Cable Commission, administrator/
staff member, or other appropriate. entity provides input and
consultation. The expenditure requests are prepared within each
city's usual budgeting processes. To the extent that available
revenues exceed the needs of the Cable Commission and Local Program-
ming budgets, each City is.able to use its portion of the revenues
for its own cable related expenditures.
STEP 4 - Management review and adjustments
- Burnsville City Manager and Eagan City Administrator jointly review
the Cable Commission and Local Programming budgets and judge
appropriateness for recommendation to respective City Councils.
- City Manager and City Administrator individually review cable related
expenditures proposed by their staff.
3�
STEP 5 - Council review
- As a part of the normal budget process, Burnsville City Manager and
Eagan City Administrator recommend cable related expenditures to
their respective Councils, who then approve budget amounts.
STEP 6 - Implementation
- Approved cable related expenditures of primary benefit to a single
city are incorporated within that city's municipal budget and
accounting control system, as a dedicated trust fund.
- The approved Cable Commission and Local Programming budgets are
fully funded by the cities at the beginning of the budget year.
Administration of the budget is managed by the Cable Administrator/
staff member and the Cable Commission and/or other appropriate entity.
5
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
VARIANCE/SUNRISE HILLS ADDITION
C. Variance for
Sunrise
Hills Addition, Argus Development,
for a
10' Variance to
the 30'
Front Yard Setback --A variance request
was submitted
by Argus
Development for the Sunrise
Hills
Addition, requesting
a
10' setback variance from the 30'
front
yard regulation
on Lots
28, 29, and 30, Block 2 and Lots 8
and 9,
B 1 ock 3.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planr�ing
and Engin ing report; copies are enclosed on pages
through -
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the 10'
variance for Sunrise Hills Addition from the 30' front yard
setback requirement for the aforementioned lots.
411
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: ARGUS DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: LOTS 4, 5, 6, BLOCK 4, AND
LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 5, SUNRISE ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: R-1
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 17, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBER 8, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Argus Development
requesting a 10' variance to the 30' front yard setback on Lots 28,
29 and 30, Block 2 and Lots 8 and 9, Block 3 of Sunrise Hills
Addition.
COMMENTS: The purpose of this variance request is to allow the
parcels to be developed with a 20' front yard setback. For
efficient development of the plat, a 10' variance is required. The
steep terrain, location of ponding easements and existing trees are
obstructions in the development of these lots. The applicant feels
approval of these variances prior to final plat approval will
simplify, in the best interest of development, the future
construction of these lots.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS: The hardships identified for justification of
granting the variance have been reviewed. The proposed grading plan
for the development shows a grade differential of 4' to 8' from the
proposed top of curb to the existing grades of the building pad back
yard areas. This 4' to 8' grade differential is not an extreme
terrain hardship for a walkout type of home construction. The
location of the pending easement allows for a minimum of 45 feet of
home building depth between the 30 foot setback line and the pending
assessment line. The smallest buildable area produced by complying
with the 30' setback requirement is approximately 3,250 square feet
on Lot 6, Block 4. As far as trying to'minimize tree removal during
home construction is concerned, this applicant has made no attempt
to identify the number, size or species of tree which could be saved
in designing a home to specifically fit each individual lot with the
10' variance versus no variances at all.
If approved, this variance shall be subject to all applicable code
requirements and the 10' variance be granted for this dwelling
portion of the home only. The garage would still be required to
comply with the 30 foot setback requirement. The garage setback at
30 feet allows for adequate driveway stacking without impacting the
traveled roadway.
�v
r
Ea
W
H M ■sl .4 M .V
Cin Os "Z
J
a—
W --
-� _ Ls I sC7Y Y75
Z Q
c
E5,;
g: •§��
s
NOI1si3DX3
s�
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MYRLIE FOR DAY CARE FACILITY
D. Conditional Use Permit for Judith and Orlin Myrlie for a Day
Care Facility at a Single-family Residence in a Light Industrial
District --A public hearing was held at the November 24, 1987
Advisory Planning Commission meeting to consider a conditional
use permit application from Judith and Orlin D. Myrlie to allow a
day care facility at a single-family residence in a light
industrial district. The APC is recommending approval.
For of the Tanning Department report, refer to pages
through The recommendation of the APC is to
remove the assessment condition that was included in the report
by the Engineering Department. The Director of Public Works will
comment on why assessments are proposed as a condition of
granting this conditional use permit.
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page;(
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
conditional use permit for Judith and Orlin Myrlie for a day care
facility at a single-family residence in a light industrial
district.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: JUDITH & ORLIN MYRLIE
LOCATION: N.E. 1/4, SECTION 11
EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 9, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a day care facility with 11 or more
children in a LI district. This single family home is located at
820 Lone Oak Road just west of the Hwy. 55/Lone Oak Road
intersection. Mrs. Myrlie is licensed by the county for the day
care use. Day care facilities are not listed in any LI category,
therefore the existing use would be considered a non -conforming use.
Since R-1 districts allow day care facilities (with Conditional Use
Permits for 11 or more children), staff required the applicant
adhere to the single family requirements.
If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to all
applicable ordinances.
ASSESSMENTS: The parcel applying for the Conditional Use Permit has
been assessed for sanitary sewer trunk, water trunk, water lateral
benefit and storm sewer trunk.
There are no pending assessments of record.
The following assessments are proposed as a condition of granting
the Conditional Use Permit:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
Water Availability Charge
$1,920/ac
.588
ac
$1,128
391
Water Lateral Upgrade
8.08/ff
136
ff
1,099
381
Storm Sewer Trunk Upgrade
.026/sf
16,000
sf
429
381
Storm Sewer Trunk
.079/sf
9,100
sf
719
Future
Street •.
82.37/ff
136
ff
11,202
Future
Trailway
12.40/ff
136
ff
1,686
TOTAL PROPOSED
ASSESSMENTS
$16,263
4
L jI
�7 01.
RDS
e2il
LOCATION
_ �iAxS
AlV.
r,
74-0
RSC ----
LFM
—K — LI�`— ;.R74
='` \
GB'-
ZONING
B' ZONING nhF
K
auu�
eW+�:
NB
GBR
iA X� a
DETAILED LOCATION
..............
WATER AVAILABILITY 0.59 ac
.............
•
WATER LATERAL,.UPGRADE 136'
'Milt,
A cxv- S
STORM SEWER TRUNK UPGRADE 16,500 sf
STORM SEWER TRUNK ADDITIONAL 9,100 sf
STREET UPGRADE 136'
TRAILWAY 136'
T� C' LE 455 L
pl�IV, 3 SmEE d
I'm �'E' —
RO
0 Y,
A 't .4 JE
4 V
R!15PZ 4;: jr urq
wu.c:v
..................
E
Fi,l 2!
I-V
..................
........ 1 -0
012 A4
cl-
z 613`04
9C 87
4t $ P9' 44
f
o91—OI
<4 4
5, 14
C,
, " F%A Will A CXv-
)rp7 FILE 4^. �455
C; E
C t No 5: C) t
R0
Y,
2PF
E.........
...........
02 -04
S 0�
-'_.O
13- 0
........ .......
..........
................
...................
0
7
w
'Milt,
A cxv- S
STORM SEWER TRUNK UPGRADE 16,500 sf
STORM SEWER TRUNK ADDITIONAL 9,100 sf
STREET UPGRADE 136'
TRAILWAY 136'
T� C' LE 455 L
pl�IV, 3 SmEE d
I'm �'E' —
RO
0 Y,
A 't .4 JE
4 V
R!15PZ 4;: jr urq
wu.c:v
..................
E
Fi,l 2!
I-V
..................
........ 1 -0
012 A4
cl-
z 613`04
9C 87
4t $ P9' 44
f
o91—OI
<4 4
5, 14
C,
, " F%A Will A CXv-
.0
/,-;i-LUt. GENT�N ROAD
..........
T
47
41 AUDITOR:,S
EK,
.0311 2
ci:x1
39.467.0
7%
31
40 .0- 1 ylyY 00 KO�LQSK;":'1j r
86.0 5-
%
PL T
42�8
21
716, 12 6 (9
I.; ji 57.4 8 �.O
),t4 .0
1211 0>4i
:M"
-7.0.0
'88.2/65.0 LEX
PAkrt
60-=-71]
EAGANDA4F-- C TER -
121,
. ................ . - -
55.8/8 71.5 98.0
-04D TJJA .. ......... ....... .
%�77�.�A 12 �4
.0
49_4 /65.6,,"' 6 all 5 1)11 7
,15
- J, - K -RW
C, G) Lo if; A' I
2 9 r ro 1611
-.0
L6,,W—
moo
�162.4/85.0
2"
4L9/60.0
�6 �9, () � r) IB"
city of eagan
L -`
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
10.
EAt 14
------ (H5 2 D3
7 .0 6715/91.0
49 7 ij
77.
503/75.0
GD I
I- IJ
1811
61.5/80.0
GD� (191' R pa 18"
ill d l I ,\/ " Aui
16
ST11T.
-
`55 51 Hwy
56
24
4)
67 .0 KIL�l Tk
1 ra
�, \ I f-- ' lit.
-- - - -------
16 24-1
-.R .
8 r;,v
51.4172.0
10
5
6.0 4R6/66.0 /43.0
dl63 -2 4u 62u
... ...........
SUBJECT PARCEL
WATER
MASTER
LAN
FIG. -#3
approved:- standard
plate j;:
49.2/74.0
U.S. POSTAL
438/68.0
SERVICE
8 .(D 4 .'
PW 6M**M7- .- -
'4ft 1'2"
L t c TQ N
}(IV \. ",
07mamm!
71 J,
2"
4L9/60.0
�6 �9, () � r) IB"
city of eagan
L -`
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT
10.
EAt 14
------ (H5 2 D3
7 .0 6715/91.0
49 7 ij
77.
503/75.0
GD I
I- IJ
1811
61.5/80.0
GD� (191' R pa 18"
ill d l I ,\/ " Aui
16
ST11T.
-
`55 51 Hwy
56
24
4)
67 .0 KIL�l Tk
1 ra
�, \ I f-- ' lit.
-- - - -------
16 24-1
-.R .
8 r;,v
51.4172.0
10
5
6.0 4R6/66.0 /43.0
dl63 -2 4u 62u
... ...........
SUBJECT PARCEL
WATER
MASTER
LAN
FIG. -#3
approved:- standard
plate j;:
4A t
L*0
H -j - d, . ...... . .....
Fa 6
LTJ
'k FP P-1
888;3 kF
193 3*3 '.LOSS <I 0 9
63-9.1
H
> i 7. . ...... r
--F'-- b-
-'-'-FP- 15861.(
83 8.0
868.t
400!�- H..,:
<F- f
IV
F-
.7
F-
X:
di
1: -k 10-
LEX
DP -12 -.24'
/868.0
72.0 EAGANDA E------CqrIQ.....__......__._...........
TEA
. . ......... . FP -7
'
S2
840.0
K- NO.
852.0
s &-N.GNIE OkK ROACD)_�
36 24
alf D—Z
CQ
1) m L.S.-30
DP—I§
5 884.0
S. 0'; TA
890.0
— SER' DP— 3
'966.0
871.7
1)P—m!J3
T-6
874.6 DP -61
878.0
857.31
866.5!
�EP-3ti
P�--—
83
. 876.3
855.4
DP -4877.2
874.8 L7 -S —v7tj� 2
879.8 7JD —
C7 110AD CO RD / 28
SUBJECT PARCEL
................
Judith & Orlin Myrlie
city of eagan STORM EWER
PUBLIC
WORKS N
PLAN
DEPARTMENT MAST
7
6N.
FIG. -5P1
approved: standard
I plate 4:
APC Minutes
November 24, 19£37
ORLIN & JUDITH MYRLIE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson Wilkins then convened the first public hearing of
the evening in regard to the application of Judith A. and Orlin D.
I4yrlie for a conditional use permit to allow a day care facility at
a single family residence in an LI (Light Industrial) district,
located along Lone Oak Road, just west of Highway #k55 in the
northeast quarter of Section 11. Assistant Planner Jim Sturm
introduced the application for the expansion of day care for 10 to
14 children in a single family home within the Light Industrial
district. Ha advised that the City Council could address the
assessments described by the engineering department.
In response to member McCrea's inquiry, he advised that the
conditional use permit could be recommended for approval without the
condition of assessments. Member Wilkins expressed concern in
regard to the policy of imposing assessments for future
improvements.
McCrea moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit without any conditions, but with the
recommendation that the issue of assessments be reviewed prior to
the City Council meeting. All voted aye.
HEALTH CENTRAL ENTERPRISES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The second public hearing of the evening in regard to
app cation of Health Central Enterprises to allow a pylon s' for
the He th One Urgent Care facility located on Lot 1, ock 1,
Norwest d Addition*, along Pilot Knob Road, in a southwest
quarter o Section 10, was then called by Chairper Wilkins. Mr.
Sturm outlin the concerns of the staff i�� cating that the
proposed pylon ign was in a good location, b,ys r would be closer than
300 feet to the a sting temporary sign f the northerly access to
the Norwest Bank an other facilities. a described a need for this
additional sign, du to the right,,'-`n/right out only access at the
southerly entrance to t bank.
Mr. Mery Layton was pr: gent on
indicated that the dpi �tiona sign
now reduced to 3 square feet. Th C
address the issue,.
Mr . _,j�-us�' afson stated that he had
use pe-rinit, and suggested that the
.eated separately by the City with
of an application submitted within a
2
behalf of the applicant and
proposed for this facility was
was no one from the public to
no btQection to the conditional
additi al Norwest Bank Sign be
additio information as part
reasonable - e period.
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City C
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/HEALTH CENTRAL ENTERPRISES
E. Conditional Use Permit for Health Central Enterprises to
Allow Pylon Signage for the Health One Urgent Care Facility --A
public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission
at its last regular meeting held on November 24, 1987 to consider
a conditional use permit to allow pylon signage for the Health
One Urgent Care Facility located on Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 2nd
Addition. The APC is recommending approval.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
Depa tment report, copies enclosed on pages _� through
Again, Engineering will comment on the reason
assessments were proposed as a condition of the conditional use
permit. The APC minutes are enclosed on page (s) 64�"' ,
77_
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign for Health One
Urgent Care Facility.
6y
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: HEALTH CENTRAL ENTERPRISES
LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, NORWEST 2ND ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING:
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE OF REPORT:
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
NOVEMBER 24, 1987
NOVEMBER 17, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign with approximately 80
SF of signage area and a maximum height of no more than 10' at the
nearly completed Urgent Care facility along Pilot Knob Road just
north of Yankee Doodle Road.
The proposed sign will be constructed of brick and stone matching
the building exterior. The shape also resembles the gable above the
building entrance. Two secondary signs near the health care
entrances must be removed to conform to the Sign Ordinance. This
proposed sign is located visually very well near the center of the
building. However, it is approximately 100' from the wood Norwest
Bank entry sign to the north. Since that sign is 'off site', staff
recommends either 1) approving a Variance to the 300' spacing
guideline with this proposal, 2) requiring Norwest Bank to submit an
application for a Special Permit to allow the existing wood sign to
remain in its present location and, 3) the removal of the existing
wood sign. Another sign approximately 140, to the south designates
right -in, right out only movement to the bank. The northern sign
designates the only full access to the bank, medical facility and
the preliminarily approved office building.
If approved, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to one of
the three above listed options, all other Sign Ordinances and the.
one time sign fee of $2.50 SF.
ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a condition
of the Conditional Use Permit:
PROJ #
DESCRIPTION
RATE
QTY
AMT
200
Pilot Knob Rd: Upgrade
$46.93/ff
150 ff
$7,040
177
Storm Sewer Trunk
.079/sf
2,700 sf
213
200
Trailway
12.40/ff
150 ff
1,860 _
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
$9,113
a
Pa
1
i
5v
P e D1 !0
-
3-37 �PARrCBB/.9P- L74-.0
*LJ S4 aE
%4� 1 F
(.'jAKS r I
CP -4
--8 2-T77-1 IT
842.6<i
OACHMA141 -4
III �;HLAN of /,r FF
7,7:
CP-��� ( I!- 3
841.9 Im
850.5
'j Z74 F
FOX R K
is RIDGE
Q4TURfJJ i
2 L
5
rd
7 ARDEN
24" . 'a T1
L
12� ,I, C P,- I
5 825.0
6 829.7---
m
< CP- 11
)
795.0
808.1
JP -2
B44.0
851.5
-S-
H I L L
ur 71 Z7
884.0 0
890.0s. Fn
SER 0P-
871.7
DP -6
8573 T
164
838.31.,
855.4
, D -8
D
DP -4
P-26
874.8 '874.8 L.S.-7 12
.'-
O
0"'
DP -20
901.0
IDP`23904.2.
8 30 2 8 9P -6
D -C z"t 0 - I.EARY P;,"R K, 882.2
C14.
;I JP -668 DP-22,F5��-
PIL �
890.0
---
BBoa--C.DP-25.
L". i k:,- 886A
HEALTH CENTRAL ENTERPRIZES
SUBJECT PARCEL
................
...............
city of eagan
E`�PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTME
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
FIG. � 1
approved: standard
I plate :#: :-
NC-,),-RW
ST
&
7"
o DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH MONUMENT SET
NO. 9053, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
2? E WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Oi
RANGE 23, IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING O(
MINUTES 23 SECONDS WEST.
-°—°—°- DENOTES "RIGHT OF ACCESS DEDICATED TO
J
�I
ra
v ....
Q1 �
�ro
W
I, `f' N.89 ° 19'31 "E•
I
'.=.---
.00 178.00
r>Zmo-'y
250.Q
FOUND 1/2 INCH 1RON
North line oP the South 80
of the North 250 ft of fi
%2 oP fhe S.W. h of the
W44 of Sec. 10
ki
. N :..;
N
0
0
-NORWEST- COURTi'
Oao
lu
v �• t^ N °
{ �. I + I o 0
.•.4. � -.1.)
I b I •Z '-Y...
�,;e
'inn
m ! 5 0
o
• to
I 6.39 y��c.,�
PIEC019D.
1
Q
m o
63 0
°p 55 0
'
55,00
O
.
No
1••' o
<zD:oD
N �
Cl)m l
-
N�
o
O,�D
Z_
o-
•
z
•
1
z3o
D J I
O=�
I
Lu
tjL x
4-Q
�I
ra
v ....
Q1 �
�ro
W
I, `f' N.89 ° 19'31 "E•
I
'.=.---
.00 178.00
r>Zmo-'y
250.Q
FOUND 1/2 INCH 1RON
North line oP the South 80
of the North 250 ft of fi
%2 oP fhe S.W. h of the
W44 of Sec. 10
ki
. N :..;
N
0
0
-NORWEST- COURTi'
Oao
lu
v �• t^ N °
{ �. I + I o 0
.•.4. � -.1.)
I b I •Z '-Y...
�,;e
'inn
m ! 5 0
o
• to
I 6.39 y��c.,�
PIEC019D.
159.51 - - 74.52 - ' \
289.03 ------ -'
�5oufh line of fhe 5outh 150 ff. of fhe
Norfh 250 Ff. of fhe S.%2 of fhe
S.W.!14 oP the SA Y,4 ol:' Sec. 10 ,
° TRAILWAY 150'
STORM SEWER TRUNK AREA 2700 s.f.
PILOT KNOB ROAD UPGRADE 150'
J74
F y Fes\
s� �
1
159.51 - - 74.52 - ' \
289.03 ------ -'
�5oufh line of fhe 5outh 150 ff. of fhe
Norfh 250 Ff. of fhe S.%2 of fhe
S.W.!14 oP the SA Y,4 ol:' Sec. 10 ,
° TRAILWAY 150'
STORM SEWER TRUNK AREA 2700 s.f.
PILOT KNOB ROAD UPGRADE 150'
J74
F y Fes\
s� �
APC Minutes
November 24, 1907
ORLIN & JUDITH MYRLIE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson Wilkins then convened the first public hearing of
the evening in regard to the application of Judith A. and Orlin D.
Myrlie for a conditional use permit to allow a day care facility at
a single family residence in an LI (Light Industrial) district,
located along Lone Oak Road, just west of Highway #55 in the
northeast quarter of Section 11. Assistant Planner Jim Sturm
introduced the application for the expansion of day care for 10 to
14 children in a single family home within the Light Industrial
district. Ha advised that the City Council could address the
assessments described by.the engineering department.
In response to member McCrea's inquiry, he advised that the
conditional use permit could be recommended for approval without the
condition of assessments. Member Wilkins expressed concern in
regard to the policy of imposing assessments for future
improvements.
McCrea moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit without any conditions, but with the
recommendation that the issue of assessments be reviewed prior to
the City Council meeting. All voted aye.
HEALTH CENTRAL ENTERPRISES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The second public hearing of the evening in regard to the
application of Health Central Enterprises to allow a pylon sign for
the Health One Urgent Care facility located on Lot 1, Block 1,
Norwest 2nd Addition,, along Pilot Knob Road, in the southwest
quarter of Section 10, was then called by Chairperson Wilkins. Mr.
Sturm outlined the concerns of the staff indicating that the
proposed pylon sign was in a good location, but would be closer than
300 feet to the existing temporary sign for the northerly access to
the Norwest Bank and other facilities. He described a need for this
additional sign, due to the right in/right out only access at the
southerly entrance to the bank.
Mr. Mery Layton was present on behalf of the applicant and
indicated that the directional sign proposed for this facility was
now reduced to 3 square feet. There was no one from the public to
address the issue.
Mr. Gustafson stated that he had no objection to the conditional
use permit, and suggested that the additional Norwest Bank Sign be
treated separately by the City with additional information as part
of an application submitted within a reasonable time period.
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
In response to Member Wilkins, staff indicated that discussions
had not been held with Norwest Bank.
Voracek moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the pylon sign, without conditions or assessments. All
voted in favor.
Voracek then moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to direct staff
to notice Norwest Bank that it should apply for a permit within 60
days, for the sign on the northwest corner of the property, warning
that it may be removed, if application is not made. All voted yea.
LEXINGTON CENTER — CONDITIONAL USE PERI4IT
The next public hearing convened by Chairperson Wilkins was in
regard to the application of Lexington Center (Mark Ravich) for a 27
foot tall pylon sign containing 120 square feet of interior lighted
signage area. The sign would be located on the parking lot island
near the center of the existing building. It was noted by Mr.
Sturm, who reviewed the application, that there would be more than
300 foot spacing between the proposed sign and the corner of
Lexington and Diffley, and also to the Phase II southerly
development.
Mr. Mark Ravich did appear on behalf of the applicant and
indicated that there appeared to be an error in regard to the first
and third assessments in the report. Mr. Foertsch agreed.
Member Krisnik questioned the staff recommendation that the sign
be a maximum of 25 feet. Mr. Sturm noted that signs at many other
locations in commercial areas in Eagan had been, by agreement,
restricted to 25 feet in height. Mr. Ravich indicated that the
applicant was unconcerned with the differentiation between 25 and 27
feet.
McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the co,nditional,use permit for a pylon sign of 25 or 27
feet in height. All voted in favor, except Voracek who voted no.
NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The public hearing in regard to the application of Naegele
Outdoor Advertising for a conditional use permit for a pylon sign on
Lot 3, Block 1, Dallas Development 2nd Addition, was called by
Chairperson Wilkins. Mr. Sturm indicated that there was an error in
the report and that the sign to be constructed was the actual same
sign previously standing near the proposed location and taken down,
due to grading and construction of the new development.
3
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/LEXINGTON CENTER
F. Conditional Use Permit for Lexington Center to Allow a Pylon
Sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Center 1st Addition --A pubic
hearing was held at the November 24, 1987 APC meeting to consider
an application for a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign
for the Lexington Center shopping center located adjacent to
Lexington Avenue and south of Diffley Road. The APC is
recommending approval of this item.
For additional information, refer to the Planning Department
report, copies enclosed on pages �� through 63. Again,
Engineering will discuss the proposed assessment, a condition
that was removed by the APC.
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page (�
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
conditional use permit for a pylon sign at Lexington Center.
6�
r'1 _.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: LEXINGTON CENTER (MARK RAVICfi)
LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1 (MEAGAN CENTER 1ST ADDITION)
EXISTING ZONING: CSC WITHIN LEXINGTON SOUTH P.D.
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 6, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign for the Lexington
Center shopping center along Lexington Avenue just south of Diff ley
Road.
The proposed 27 foot tall sign conforms to all sign ordinances and
contains 120 S.F. of interior lighted signage area. This sign will
be located on a parking lot island near the center of the existing
building. The 2nd phase building received preliminary plat approval
in June, 1987 -- no pylon was requested with that approval.
However, there would be 300 lineal feet between the proposed sign
and an area for another pylon for this phase 2 building.
Staff recommends a 25' MAXIMUM height -- similar to the fast food
restaurants along Yankee Doodle Road and Cliff Road.
ASSESSMENTS: The Eagan Center 1st Addition has previously been
assessed for water availability charge, sanitary sewer trunk, storm
sewer trunk, street and lateral benefit from trunk water main.
There are no pending assessments of record. The following
assessments are proposed as a condition of granting this Conditional
Use Permit:
PROJ #
DESCRIPTION
RATE
QTY
AMT
299/304
Water Trunk
$1,250/ac
2.4ac
$3,000
299/304
Lateral Benefit
1.92/ff
394 ff
756
Upgrade
330
Trailway
12.40/ff
394 ft
4,886
TOTAL PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT
$8,642
If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to:
1) All applicable sign ordinances.
i
2) The one-time sign fee of $2.50 S.Fiy
3) A maximum height of 25'.
(� I
/f1lr 9,r► 7'
'COUNTY s Tr.
5 s9l4s'od'E. 751,9e
.,
4�.go (it E s.)
0 AID
DOC. NO. 571617 j�-li(j�IWAY
S 890 52' 2511 E 736.39
•
PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PER DOCS NO 52
1 AND 73382
15
%
.......... :
... . .....
............. ........ * .......
.... ................
..........................................
....... ....
...............
.................
.................
....... ......
iQ
......... ... ...
......... : 7
..... ......
. . ......
.... .......
-SEE DETAIL-
. ................ . .....
N 55006'5E
A= 42° 02' 14'
R= 230.97
L= 169.46
S 82'0 50 5C
.........
...........
...... . 80.00
. . .. . ..............
...................
Q:--w*-N 07009'10
80.00
vow-
==PON
0 rn
o
WATER TRUNK AREA 2.4 ac
N 82 0 5 0'50
80.00
--N 07009 lo'
255.00
``' WATER LATERAL BENEFIT UPGRADE 394'
Mummm TRAILWAY 394'
671--
,b
3
DESIGNATED ACCESS
_tL030d2$t, _14a f%l 000 nom'
0-2
J `fff `i7
-t1 /Es1oTRb
o/�i 2 ; I -
�rl--
68 h "jf k_.16 ��— II2 50.4/67.0
Q�0 53.2
1611
Ifa�K dpA E AD ow ..r �� 119 5 �....
L _ 4.6/ 71.0 �
1611 y
/ ^:� .�. •, 118 53.1/68.0 50.3/67.0
-I-�-__� -I''j •r I�lt f lJ'
179 IrOEMn
6(120D59.9/75� \\
NV 17 7 I - 2:3--
59.8/76.0 3-_59.8/76.0 51.4/65.0
i 11 18.4 / 2 9.0
12 180
r i r PATRICK
.-_ ...
E
) ,�''�� u.. PARK I( �59-6086
ROUND STORAGE
�1..ljt �- �� P.M. BOOSTER
171.': Y.. �- __ .�; • L 1059
42.6/.57.0 �i'102`m:
"
as 172 „rI3176 68.0/82.0 182 68.0/ 24 i!
2 17u 1020_ O/720 72.0.1 Vin" CL �0�
4 Z[] ! 111_U -mmk-i •
35.5/50.0 238 231 I 12' 184 68.7/ 74.0 185
i�
86,0/9.0 w 74.4/82.0
►•:,:_;i..tflv��� � I�� 111: '��•. ' �, \ �
Lu
RIJ5 N
70.8 76.
RK, %� ! r��•�+{,`;. 21LI '� a 200 / 0-:
2'_(� L �L!� rt5 .2/6�.�•�„ j'auUL,�-{jf•)}`
[iLl_��i75 ;,�i C'�ri�]L%i 45.6/58.0
v• 173 '49.7,/�OIO{.�12"��I 1: 201 t
43:4 5fi 0: 174 020 - 2
er�2Qz f 203 43,3/58.0
h� n fi
.•;til;>t v' \ ,1 16 a .1�� 2Q 77 . �'Qyg? k� ,� ( 1211
1117 TIOr= 199 425/63.0 5
X11 Lj Wim— �hn' 4 r:2`/_' �:. Q / �rlim i�� �rL'-.
I I 'L-AkE',YGOp '
Jnr '�`
i
TR Ar. ENS` 1( Atl 208 t'1`>J
D SITE 4 i•1)[j_ �'•s
WL i �-.�� ]T �ti 9.�. n ! '�dv1•: 207 91.1 /'ggam� l Jrl_U J I I �) � �' ��f�-`;
'n' �: .rg :��3+i�;1•.�- O t1r�•S: -] I � `11 �!y � O�.n _
12 1.
. ... ......
24 i r� 124- - 24°* ;�^ ��
n . Y
70',5/74.0 211 211 7o.si7anf i` TT1 �n� �-"�` -'7
2 Ili `.�O_r 20'
city of eagan
�i PUBLIC
-`�-;
WORKS
DE PARTME
LEXINGTON CENTER
SUBJECT PARCEL
WATER
MASTER PLAN
FIG. 7+3
approved:- standard
plate 4:
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
In response to Member Wilkins, staff indicated that discussions
had not been held with Norwest Bank.
Voracek moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the pylon sign, without conditions or assessments. All
voted in favor.
Voracek then moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to direct staff
to notice Norwest Bank that it should apply for a permit within 60
days, for the sign on the northwest corner of the property, warning
that it may be removed, if application is not made. All voted yea.
LEXINGTON CENTER - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The next public hearing convened by Chairperson Wilkins was in
regard to the application of Lexington Center (Mark Ravich) for a 27
foot tall pylon sign containing 120 square feet of interior lighted
signage area. The sign would be located on the parking lot island
near the center of the existing building. It was noted by Mr.
Sturm, who reviewed the application, that there would be more than
300 foot spacing between the proposed sign and the corner of
Lexington and Diffley, and also to the Phase II southerly
development.
Mr. Mark Ravich did appear on behalf 'of the applicant and
indicated that there appeared to be an error in regard to the first
and third assessments in the report. Mr. Foertsch agreed.
Member Krisnik questioned the staff recommendation that the sign
be a maximum of 25 feet. Mr. Sturm noted that signs at many other
locations in commercial areas in Eagan had been, by agreement,
restricted to 25 feet in height. Mr. Ravich indicated that the
applicant was unconcerned with the differentiation between 25 and 27
feet.
.:.McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign of 25 or 27
feet in height. All voted in favor, except Voracek who voted no.
NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The public hearing in regard to the application of Naegele
Outdoor Advertising for a conditional use permit for a pylon sign on
Lot 3, Block 1, Dallas Development 2nd Addition, was called by
Chairperson Wilkins. Mr. Sturm indicated that there was an error in
the report and that the sign to be constructed was the actual same
sign previously standing near the proposed location and taken down,
due to grading and construction of the new development.
3
Agenda Information Memo,
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
G. Conditional Use Permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising to
Allow a Billboard Advertising Sign along Highway 13 on Lot 3 of
the Dallas Development 2nd Addition --A public hearing was held by
the APC at its last regular meeting held on November 24, 1987 to
consider an application -for a conditional use permit to allow the
reconstruction of the Naegele billboard that was previously
located on the north side of the Highway 13/Blackhawk Road
intersection. The APC is recommending approval.
Fo a copy of the Planning Department report, refer to pages
through
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to pages -�b--
through �.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
conditional use permit for an advertising sign for Naegele
Outdoor Advertising.
L6
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ADVERTISING SIGN
APPLICANT: NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 1,
DALLAS DEVELOPMENT 2ND ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 12, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a
Conditional Use Permit to allow the re -construction of the Naegele
billboard that was previously located on the north side of the Hwy.
13/Blackhawk Road intersection.
The sign was originally erected in October 1984 and removed early
this fall when the grading for the Dallas Development 2nd Addition
began. That sign measured 10' x 36' (360 SF) and had a 40' maximum
height. The billboard will be relocated on the N.E. corner of Lot
3. The proposed sign measures 19'x 48' (912 SF) with a maximum
height of 40'. Staff is concerned with the additional signage area
greater than the 360 SF previously approved. No other pylons are
within 300 lineal feet and no other advertising signs are within
1,000 feet (on the same side of the street).
If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to:
1) A minimum 20' setback from the Hwy. 13 row.
2) The one-time sign fee of $2.50 S.F.
OW,
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
In response to Member Wilkins, staff indicated that discussions
had not been held with Norwest Bank.
Voracek moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the pylon sign, without conditions or assessments. All
voted in favor.
Voracek then moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to direct staff
to notice Norwest Bank that it should apply for a permit within 60
days, for the sign on the northwest corner of the property, warning
that it may be removed, if application is not made. All voted yea.
LEXINGTON CENTER — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The next public hearing convened by Chairperson Wilkins was in
regard to the application of Lexington Center (Mark Ravich) for a 27
foot tall pylon sign containing 120 square feet of interior lighted
signage area. The sign would be located on the parking lot island
near the center of the existing building. It was noted by Mr.
Sturm, who reviewed the application, that there would be more than
300 foot spacing between the proposed sign and the corner of
Lexington and Diffley, and also to the Phase II southerly
development.
Mr. Mark Ravich did appear on behalf of the applicant and
indicated that there appeared to be an error in regard to the first
and third assessments in the report. Mr. Foertsch agreed.
Member Krisnik questioned the staff recommendation that the sign
be a maximum of 25 feet. Mr. Sturm noted that signs at many other
locations in commercial areas in Eagan had been, by agreement,
restricted to 25 feet in height. Mr. Ravich indicated that the
applicant was unconcerned with the differentiation between 25 and 27
feet.
McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the conditional;use permit for a pylon sign of 25 or 27
feet in height. All voted in favor, except Voracek who voted no.
NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The public hearing in regard to the application of Naegele
Outdoor Advertising for a conditional use permit for a pylon sign on
Lot 3, Block 1, Dallas Development 2nd Addition, was called by
Chairperson Wilkins. Mr. Sturm indicated that there was an error in
the report and that the sign to be constructed was the actual same
sign previously standing near the proposed location and taken down,
due to grading and construction of the new development.
3
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
Mr. Michael Cronin was present to answer questions on behalf of
the applicant. Mr. Sturm advised member Gustafson that indeed this
same sign was being constructed and had previously been approved at
672 square feet. He also advised member McCrea that a new sign fee
of $2.50 per square foot would be imposed.
Krisnik moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following
conditions:
1. There shall be a minimum 20 foot setback from the Highway
#13 row.
2. There shall be a one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot.
All voted affirmatively.
TRIANGLE METALLURGICAL, INC. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson Wilkins convened the public hearing upon the
application of Triangle Metallurgical, Inc. for conditional use
permit to allow a freight terminal in an LI (Light Industrial)
district, located on the east side of Highway #49, just north of the
UPS facility. Mr. Sturm described the application, indicating that
the site had previously been used as a freight terminal by Brown
Transport. He also described the applicant's business, which was to
buy and sell scrap metal in amounts as small as 1,000 pounds, which
were then stored inside until a truck load shipment could be made.
He advised that no processing was involved nor any outside storage.
He also indicated that the site was presently fenced with chain link
fencing. It was noted that the applicant was not present and that
members indicated that since they appeared to have no questions,
they might act upon the matter.
There was no one from the public to discuss the application.
Member Gustafson questioned whether it was a good time to
consider landscaping. Mr. Sturm indicated that landscaping was
considered, but that the site was presently asphalt from the
building to the street, leaving no area for landscaping without
major renovation. He also indicated that the applicant would be
advised of the proposed assessment, prior to City Council meeting.
Voracek moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit, subject to the applicant being
contacted in regard to the assessment and upcoming City Council
meeting. All voted yes.
67
n
Y
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT%TRIANGLE METALLURGICAL, INC
H. Conditional Use Permit for Triangle Metallurgical, Inc. to
Allow a Freight Terminal in a Light Industrial District along
State Highway 149--A public hearing was held by the Advisory
Planning Commission at its last regular meeting held on November
24, 1987 to consider a conditional use permit to allow a freight
terminal in a light industrial district located on the east side
of Highway 149 just north of the UPS facility. The APC is
recommending approval.
For a copy of the Planning Department"report, refer to pages
through %% 'A small assessment in the amount of
was recomm nded as a condition by Engineering; however,
the assessment condition was removed by the APC as a part of its
action.
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to pages)
r
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
conditional use permit for Triangle Metallurgical, Inc. to allow
a freight terminal in a light industrial district.
70
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: TRIANGLE METALLURGICAL INC.
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE OF REPORT:
NE 1/4, SECTION 13
LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
NOVEMBER 24, 1987
NOVEMBER 12, 1987
REPORTED BY: 'PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a freight terminal in a LI district
located along the east side of Hwy. 49 just north of the UPS
facility. There currently is a freight terminal on the site that
was most recently occupied by Brown Transport.
Even though the previous use was similar, no Conditional Use Permit
was ever processed prior to this application.
Triangle Metallurgical of Granite City, Illinois operates 20
facilities throughout the country. They buy and sell scrap metals
for small business' to large industrial accounts. A typical
'truckload' carries 40,000 pounds of metal -- Triangle Metallurgical
will purchase as little as 1,000 pounds and then store the material
until a truckload size shipment can be made. This provides both
competitive buy and sell prices of the metal. There is no
processing involved and no outside storage is requested. The site
is completely fenced.
If approved, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to all
applicable ordinance and that there shall be no outside storage.
ASSESSMENTS: The parcelapplying for this Conditional Use Permit
has previously been assessed for sanitary sewer trunk, water trunk,
water availability, storm sewer trunk, and lateral benefit from
sanitary sewer.
Based on a review of the previously levied assessments and using the
rates in effect at the time the assessments were levied, it was
found that the lateral benefit from the water main and the lateral
benefit from sanitary sewer were not properly allocated. As a
result of this misallocation of those two items, the property was
underassessed in the amou'4, of $1,434. As a condition of granting
this Conditional Use Permit,, the property will be responsible for
paying this underassessment of $1,434.
-71
SITE
ZONING
PU
R-1
a
A
3400
mc
A
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
Mr. Michael Cronin was present to answer questions on behalf of
the applicant. Mr. Sturm advised member Gustafson that indeed this
same sign was being constructed and had previously been approved at
672 square feet. He also advised member McCrea that a new sign fee
of $2.50 per square foot would be imposed.
Krisnik moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following
conditions:
1. There shall be a minimum 20 foot setback from the Highway
#13 row.
2. Thera shall be a one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot.
All voted affirmatively.
TRIANGLE METALLURGICAL, INC. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson Wilkins convened the public hearing upon the
application of Triangle Metallurgical, Inc. for conditional use
permit to allow a freight terminal in an LI (Light Industrial)
district, located on the east side of Highway #49, just north of the
UPS facility. Mr. Sturm described the application, indicating that
the site had previously been used as a freight terminal by Brown
Transport. He also described the applicant's business, which was to
buy and sell scrap metal in amounts as small as 1,000 pounds, which
were then stored inside until a truck load shipment could be made.
He advised that no processing was involved nor any outside storage.
He also indicated that the site was presently fenced with chain link
fencing. It was noted that the applicant was not present and that
members indicated that since they appeared to have no questions,
they might act upon the matter.
There was no one from the public to discuss the application.
Member Gustafson questioned whether it was a good time to
consider landscaping. Mr. Sturm indicated that landscaping was
considered, but that the site was presently asphalt from the
building to the street, leaving no area for landscaping without
major renovation. He also indicated that the applicant would be
advised of the proposed assessment, prior to City Council meeting.
Voracek moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit, subject to the applicant being
contacted in regard to the assessment and upcoming City Council
meeting. All voted yes.
715
4
Agenda Information Memo
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT/BLACKHAWK PLAZA
I. Waiver of Plat for Blackhawk Plaza, Inc., to Combine the Western
15' of Lot 4 with Lot 5 of the Blackhawk Plaza Addition for an
Automotive Service Station --A public hearing was held by the
Advisory Planning Commission to consider a waiver of plat
application submitted by Blackhawk Plaza, Inc., for the purpose of
combining the western 15' of Lot 4 with Lot 5 of the Blackhawk Plaza
Addition abutting Diffley Road just east of Blackhawk Road. The APC
is recommending approval.
For a copy of the Planning and Engineering Department report, refer
to pages through %Gf
T_
For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page(s)
0 __Y/ -
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver
of plat for Blackhawk Plaza to combine the western 15' of Lot 4 with
Lot 5 of the Blackhawk Plaza Addition for an automotive service
station located adjacent to Diffley Road.
7�
e ,1 u
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT;
1 �
APPLICANT: BLACKHAWK PLAZA INCORPORATED
LOCATION: LOT 4 AND 5, BLACKHAWK PLAZA
EXISTING ZONING: N.B. (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 12, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting
a waiver of plat to combine the western 15' of Lot 4 with Lot 5 of
the Blackhawk Plaza Addition abutting Diffley Road just east of
Blackhawk Road. The 15' increase is necessary so the proposed gas
station and single bay car wash are able to meet side yard setback
requirements. A conditional use permit was approved in 1985 with
the initial Blackhawk Plaza plat allowing motor fuel sales on Lot 5.
A site plan was also approved at that time. This new proposal
will not adversely affect Lot 4 as a buildable lot.
The Phillips 66 Company has become involved with this lot and is
proposing changes to the original plan approved in 1985. This plan
calls for two separate buildings on the same lot - controlled by a
single owner.
The convenience store and car wash have a combined lot coverage of
only 6% but the canopy adds an additional 15.6%. Either a variance
for 1.6% will be required or the canopy will need to be reduced by
517 S.F. to meet the 20% requirement in NB districts. The canopy is
considered a building setback and 50' is required along Diffley Road
- 41' is proposed. Similar canopy variances were allowed at the Q
station along Diffley and the new Superamerica at Town Centre.
Four gas pump islands are proposed and seven 'employee type'
parallel parking stalls will be provided along with the eight along
the pump islands.. This should be adequate since no service bays are
proposed. There is some flexibility for the north/south location of
the car wash that would provide for more stacking area. The
orientation of the building is desirable with the exit on the south
allowing for sun exposure in the winter months. Both buildings will
be constructed with a flagstone finish.
No pylon signage is proposed since the main Blackhawk Plaza entry
sign is on the southwest corner of the lot.
ASSESSMENTS: The parcels in the Blackhawk Plaza Addition have been
previously assessed for sanitary sewer trunk. water trunk, water
availability charge, water availability upgrade and storm sewer
trunk.
The Blackhawk Plaza Addition is subject�to the following pending
assessments:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
372 Street (Diffley Rd.) $64.81/ff $355.22 ff $23,022 (1)
372 Lateral Benefit 9.29/ff 355.22 ff 3,300 (1)
Storm Sewer
372 Trailway 10,67/ff 355.22 ff 3,790 (1)
(1) Respread on an area basis to the parcels in Blackhawk Plaza
The following assessments are proposed as a condition of this Waiver
of Plat:
PROJ #
DESCRIPTION
RATE
QTY
AMT
372
Street (Diffley
Rd.) $82.37/ff
$285.00 ff
$23,475
372
Trailway
12.40/ff
285.00 ff
3,534
372
Lateral Benefit
10.39/ff
285.00 ff
2,961
Storm Sewer
TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
$29,970
CONDITIONS: BLACKHAWK PLAZA
1. The lot coverage shall be no more than 20; or the canopy shall
be reduced by 517 S.F.
2. The signage on the canopy shall be no more than 20% of each
side.
3. No additional pylon sign will be permitted on this lot.
4. There shall be no exterior sales or displays.
5. A variance to allow a 41' canopy variance along Diffley Road
shall be approved.
Q:
A
fir• '•'�:�,
m \
7 1--.•
i =
i � _�`.. :� 'moi• ` _�-.'_.
!' 'F ►'' �� .._ .ter
] 9y 3 ter• •, '•O �i�•
77
y r 1 .`,.•I_ 816:Z!Tf_P ' 790.3
I
r A-1, 8/8.8 .I ( ;r I i flri) ! -^';; 80/.0 I
AP�36' 1-i!Ji .``Y!+ti:!'(' ~
a0 I z"
tia,. ce...
=c•.i -2803.6 SP807.6 -1 54` 792.3 !:
w 79 2.3 ;
AP=1•.,•, 801.0
"
797.3-1( , $4" . J.; -.' Li I, r�1 BP -29
"8017.6 :. '• �. ; . I : - I 609.7
818.
856.6 `I C, •M F �_, - BP 28
. t^•;E, 1'p ` 866.3 B -a 862.6
a BP 33 �4
�8611,10%72 36" '2 7 S 886.0 E
1 I' ,A�n - -r �_=_ _ 895.2
ICU
BP -3
•-.li- - - --- .tel �r I 1•L; -'{`t~- .., i - -- � /�� 889.9
I .. ....... ........ : 15 r2
_ _ i f�
905
1' ' = 1- d I /B P- 35 1 . E
72 i' 908.0
\�. I_. A_P. 920.2
?
A-V r %,886.3 j j��t/ BP -4
! J 3... A -w F. 2
_� / % BP -25 8 4.
24.0 BF
7
-35 Ii 2 272 886.5
9 8f
3.
880.6 i�01111� i B-sj.! 86
i' 6.
A- 886.0' + ti
x
� 42J
E3
k.BP-24'
.jfi
i. . `E
�'--AP-511/ i i ! 918.0 r
1,7 •`
AP 1 8 90.p i! �' 1 923.2 E
889.2 t5 894.Orr - _!
J .893.9, !; A P-28' + = B -d
918,1
A_y N :i BP -23 _....._. .. �i
,I:r i' '� �f. :-93L3 I _ ,r•BP-IB
A -z BP -9.r`-" "932,:3 I 882.9 r:
24 ' .� ?n<, AP- 12 - �ti k ` 911 .3 1 7 - 892.0 •N
0% i ( ,1 893.3 f �.9/9.S•. <L1 BP-
04.0
! AP -24/ AP -22 AP -43. ° �' '�Y`• 882.0 ; �;� gP-16
" r 872.0 873.6 ! 896.0: I�P-ib'. - %� 910.0 -898.9 ,
a 874.2 882.0 '. 693, \�. •J909.8�+ 8!'g• v,; 901.1%
A -ab Is' 12'18" -= 9/6.0 122,7,'-.-... B -e BP - Ir
4-1 rw,.J 4 ; r t ! v::a; f '= i -i. L.S.-31 16 g
12
+ -cc �!' ;'�'� r!C}�~'_916.O,r
f,APTO. I
SUBJECT PARCEL
BLACKHAWK PLAZA
City of eagan
PUBLIC STORM SEWER
C
WORKS
DEPARTMENT1 MASTER PLAN
7�
FIG. -*1
approved: standard
plate #:
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
4. The impact of 18 to 24 foot retaining walls had not been
addressed.
5. Staff had not had time to review the significance of the
revised ponding plan.
6. No soil and erosion control plan had been reviewed by the
staff, nor submitted.
7. No information as to the necessary agency permits was
available.
S. While minor issues are often left to be resolved through
staff before City Council action, there were many major issues left
in this application.
9. The DNR has stated that the Shoreland Zoning Ordinance
should be applied including revision by the DNR, and no specific
resolution has been made.
10. Shoreland conservation had not been adequately discussed.
11. The impact on the elementary school and playground parking
needed to be resolved.
12. It appeared that nearly all the trees would be destroyed by
the massive grading and utility construction.
Member Voracek again pointed out that he, as well as others,
were not necessarily against the development, but that there was a
lack of sufficient answers. All voted yes, except Wilkins who voted
no, and pointed out that this was a only a preliminary plat and that
these issues may or may not be resolved prior to council approval,
but certainly could be resolved prior to final plat approval. She
also pointed out that in her opinion, there was a legal right to the
development through the PD's designation of CSC, LB and RB.
_•Y The Commission then took a short recess until 9:40 p.m.
BLACKHAWK PLAZA - WAIVER OF PLAT
Chairperson Wilkins then convened the next public hearing of the
evening �iri `"regard to- the application of Blackhawk Plaza, Inc.
requesting a waiver of plat to combine the western 15 feet of Lot 4
with Lot 5 of Blackhawk Plaza Addition, abutting Diffley Road, just
east of Blackhawk Road. Mr. Runkle indicated that the 15 foot
increase was necessary so that the proposed gas station and single
bay car wash would be able to meet the side -yard setback
requirements. He noted that a conditional use permit was approved
'J_-4 : l�
11
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
in 1985 with the initial Blackhawk Plaza plat, allowing motor fuel
sales on Lot 5. A site plan was also approved at that time. This
new proposal would not adversely affect Lot 4 as a buildable lot.
He also pointed out that in discussing the application with the
applicant that evening, that a variance for lot coverage was not
necessary, as the canopy also covered the proposed building. He did
advise that a variance was needed from the street setback, as the
canopy was only 41 feet from the right-of-way. However, the City
had allowed such encroachments for the Q Petroleum, SuperAmerica and
other sites.
Mr. Jim Phillipe of North Star Consultants was present and
reiterated that the building is under the proposed canopy and
therefore the lot coverage computations are inaccurate. It was his
understanding that the assessment issue would be clarified at the
Council meeting. No one from the public was present to address the
issue.
The public hearing was closed. Member McCrea questioned the
hardship for variance for the setback for the canopy, and Mr. Runkle
indicated that really, there was none other than that inconsistency
of previous approvals.
Member Krisnik expressed concerns about outside storage and
display, which staff said had been addressed in other similar
developments. He advised that the neighborhood had generally
approved the appearance of the development, even though it had
initially opposed it, and that gas service would be acceptable if
located where proposed, rather than along Blackhawk Road adjacent to
the Tom Thumb store.
Member Voracek questioned whether the neighbors had been noticed
about a variance. Mr. Runkle _indicated that this would be checked
and notice provided before the City Council meeting.
Voracek moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the waiver of plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. The lot coverage shall,be no more than 20%.
2. The signage on the canopy shall be no more than 20% of each
side.
3. No additional pylon sign will be permitted on this lot.
4. There shall be no exterior sales or displays.
5. A variance to allow a 41 foot canopy variance along Diffley
Road shall be approved.
6. There shall be no outside storage or display of goods.
All voted in favor.
FA
Agenda Information Memo
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT/MC MENOMY AND KIRCHNER
J. Waiver of Plat for Edward McMenomy and Cedric Kirchner to Split
22.06 Acres of Agriculturally Zoned Property into Two Separate
Parcels with Different Ownership Containing 5.81 and 16.25 Acres --A
publi hearing was held by Advisory Planning Commission to consider
an application submitted by Cedric Kirchner and processed by Edward
Mc Menomy, Mr. Kirchner's attorney, for a waiver of plat to split
22.06 agricultural acres into two separate parcels with different
ownership along the west side of Highway 3 and south of Cliff Road.
The purpose of the waiver of plat is to allow for the conveyance and
recording of land sales only. The APC is recommending approval of
this item.
Enclosed on pagesVIA
(;J through is a copy of the Planning and
Engineering Report.
For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of those
minutes found on page(
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat in the name of Cedric Kirchner to split 22.06
agricultural acres into two (2) separate parcels with different
ownership containing 5.81 and 16.25 acres.
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: EDWARD McMENOMY
(ATTORNEY FOR CEDRIC KIRCHNER)
LOCATION: NE 1/4 & NW 1/4, SECTION 36
EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a
Waiver of Plat in order to split 22.06 A (Agricultural) acres into
two separate parcels with different ownership located along the west
side of Hwy. 3 and south of Cliff Road. This Waiver of Plat is
necessary for the conveyance and recording of land sales only. The
City will not issue any building permits or allow any site
development until the area is platted.
The Kirchners sold the existing home and 5.81 acre parcel earlier
this year and the remaiing 16.25 acres have been purchased by
Harstad Development - a single family home builder that replatted
the Bur Oak Hills Addition in 1986.
The Kirchners also own the 3.5.1 acres and a 16' x 410' strip just
west of this 22.06 acres that abutts Dodd Road. Those two parcels
should be combined into a single parcel. No building permits will
be issued until that area is platted also.
If approved, the Waiver of Plat shall be subject to:
1) The 16' x 410' strip and 3.51 acres abutting Dodd Road shall be
combined into a single parcel.
2) No building permits or site development shall occur until
platting takes place.
un
SITE
ZONING
LAND USE
1:
0
APC Minutes
November 24. 1987
EDWARD McMENOMY - WAIVER OF PLAT
The next public hearing was called in regard to the application
of Edward McMenomy for waiver of plat in order to split 22.06
Agricultural acres in two separate parcels with different ownership
containing 5.81 and 16.25 acres, located in the northeast quarter of
Section 36, west of Highway tt3. Mr. Runkle indicated that in
addition, the applicant was required to incorporate a 3.5 acre and
16 foot by 410 foot strip into the 16.25 acre oar --el. He advised
that staff had determined that it might be premature to require
replatting of the property as the 5.8 acre site presently included a
homestead.
Mr. Paul Steer was present on behalf of Mr. McMenomy to respond
to questions. There was no one from the public.
Gustafson moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. The 16 by 410 foot strip, the 16.25 acre parcel and the 3.51
acres abutting Dodd Road shall be combined into a single parcel.
2. No building permits or site development shall occur until
platting takes place on the 20+ acre parcel.
All voted affirmatively.
BERRY RIDGE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT, REZONING
- AND COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
Chairperson Wilkins then convened the next public hearing of the
evening in regard to the applications of Arcon Construction,
requesting a. rezoning of -1.47 -R-3 (townhouse) acres into two
separate R-1 and R-2 districts containing 3 single family lots and
one duplex lot,_-•respectively;•a preliminary plat of Berry Ridge
Addition, and a Comprehensive Guide amendment. Mr. Runkle described
the. -proposed- along Berry Ridge'- Road:..on an -undeveloped -portion of the
":Hilltop of Eagan condominium plat.
.Mr. Scott—Johnson :,of --Arcon' Construction ,:
Agenda Information Memo
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
ARCON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY/BERRY RIDGE ADDITION
K. Comp Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for
Arcon Construction Company for 1.47 R-3 Acres within the Hilltop of
Eagan Addition to one R-2 Duplex Lot and Four R-1 Single Family
Lots --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission
at their last regular meeting held on November 24, 1987, to consider
a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, rezoning from R-3 to R-1 and
R-2 and a preliminary plat for 1.47 acres within the Hilltop
Addition to allow a duplex and three single family lots. The APC is
recommending approval.
.For a copy the Planning and Engineering Department reports, refer
to pages through _ f0� .
For a copy of the action that was taken by the APC, refer to those
minutes found on page (s
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny
1) Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, 2) rezoning from R-3 to R-2
and R-1 and 3) a preliminary plat entitled Berry Ridge Addition as
presented.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING,
PRELIMINARY PLAT (BERRY RIDGE ADDITION)
APPLICANT: ARCON CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION: HILLTOP OF EAGAN (SW 1/4 OF SECTION 22)
EXISTING ZONING: R-3 (
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 7, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION: Separate applications have been submitted
requesting a rezoning of 1.47 R-3 (townhouse) acres into two
separate R-1 and R-2 districts containing three single family
lots and one duplex lot respectively and a preliminary plat for
the Berry Ridge Addition. This site is located along Berry Ridge
Road on an undeveloped portion of the Hilltop of Eagan
condominium plat. The January, 1987 Land Use Plan designates
this area as D -III, therefore, an amendment will be necessary.
SITE PLAN: This plan replats the northern undeveloped portion of
the Hilltop of Eagan plat that was approved/revised in 1983 to
allow two buildings with a total of 28 units. The original
developer is proposing this revised plat that will compliment the
single family homes on the north side of Berry Ridge Road much
better than a multiple unit project. Other adjacent land uses
are the Hilltop Plaza to the west and single family homes to the
east.
This site, containing a number of existing easements, slopes
steeply from the west to the east with a total grade change of
over 40' making it rather difficult to develop. There is an
existing stand of low quality jack pines on Lot 4 that will
removed with the grading. All other trees are immature pines of
little significant value.
All lots exceed R-1 and R-2 code requirements. The single family
lots vary in size from 12,010 S.F. to 15,106 S.F. and the overall
plat density in 4.08 units/acre. Staff recommends allowing a 20'
sideyard setback for the single family Lot 4 along Hilltop Lane
since the driveway will connect to Berry Ridge Road.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The existing topography of the
proposed site generally ranges from a high of approximately
elevation 930 in the southwest corner to a low of about elevation
885 in the southeast corner, an existing elevation differential of
approximately 45'. The proposed grading plan complies with the
City's maximum allowable 3:1 slope criteria.
The proposed grading plan shows cuts of 4'-6' in areas where the
existing water main is approximately 7 1/2' deep. Staff advises the
abandonment of the existing 6" water main in this area.
The grading plan proposes to direct the storm water runoff from the
street side areas of the proposed building pad locations to the
street. A side lot line drainage swale is proposed between Lots 4
and 5 which directs their sideyard drainage and backyard drainage
easterly and northerly to Berry Ridge Road. The backyard areas of
Lots 1, 2, 3 and 5 is proposed to be conveyed easterly along a
rearyard drainage swale to an existing catch basin located in the
southeasterly portion of proposed Lot 1. Said drainage swale is
proposed to be slightly bermed along its southerly edge to prevent
the drainage, generated on Lots 1, 2, 3 and 5, from impacting the
existing buildings located within the Hilltop of Eagan Condominiums.
Staff advises the construction of a berm from the existing
condominium building directly south of proposed Lots 1 and 2 to a
point easterly and northerly of the existing catch basin. This berm
will then, in fact, direct drainage directly into the existing catch
basin, therefore, minimizing the possibility of the backyard runoff
adversely impacting the existing condominium buildings and their
parking lot. The development will be responsible for extending the
existing outlet into Pond LP -63 to its normal water level. Prior to
the City accepting this existing private storm sewer as a public
facility, the development will be responsible for televising the
line and verifying that the line was constructed to acceptable City
standards.
An erosion and sediment control plan was not submitted as a part of
this application. Attached to this report are recommendations made
by the Dakota County Soil & Water Conservation District.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service to the proposed site is readily
available in numerous locations. Lot 1 is served by an existing 6"
sanitary sewer line along its easterly boundary, Lots 2 and 4 will
need to cut a service into the existing sanitary sewer line in Berry
Ridge Road and Lots 3 and 5 will take service from an existing 6"
sanitary sewer line which was stubbed to the site from the southerly
adjacent Hilltop of Eagan Condominiums. The existing sanitary sewer
lines which serve the proposed site will need to be televised and
verified prior to the City accepting the line as a public facility
and assuming perpetual maintenance responsibilities.
Water service is readily available from the existing 6" water main
which extends through the proposed site. Due to the proposed
grading of Lots 4 and 5, staff advises the development to eliminate
the existing 6" water main which connects the water main in Hilltop
Lane with the water main along the common lot lines between Lots 2
and 3. Elimination of this connection will require an extension of
the water main along the said common lot line to the existing 8"
water main in Berry Ridge Road. The duplex Lot 5 can then take its
P
water service from the street side of the existing hydrant along
Hilltop Lane and Lot 4 will take service from the existing water
main in Berry Ridge Road. Water service to Lots 1, 2 and 3 are
acceptable as proposed.
! i•
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development will be
responsible for any costs incurred in obtaining offsite easements
for storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water main. An additional 10
foot wide easement is needed along the east line of proposed Lot 1
where only a 10 foot wide easement is proposed. The existing 27"
sanitary sewer is approximately 28' deep in this location. A 20'
wide easement is needed across proposed Lot 3 for the existing
sanitary sewer as well as across the Hilltop of Eagan Condominiums.
A 20' wide easement is needed along the existing storm sewer outlet
into Pond LP -63 as well as along the existing 6" water main which
serves the proposed development and crosses the Hilltop of Eagan
Condominiums.
The development is responsible for verifying the locations of all
existing utilities to ensure proper easement descriptions are
drafted. Sufficient right-of-way for Hilltop Lane and Berry Ridge
Road have been provided in previous platting processes.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed site is readily
available from Berry Ridge Road and Hilltop Lane.
ASSESSMENTS: The proposed site has been previously assessed for
sanitary sewer trunk, water area trunk, storm sewer trunk, water
lateral benefit from trunk and sanitary sewer lateral benefit from
trunk.
There are no pending or proposed assessments of record proposed as a
condition of final plat approval.
90
CONDITIONS: BERRY RIDGE ADDITION
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. The driveway for Lot 4 shall connect to Berry Ridge Road and
a 20' setback shall be allowed if desired along Hilltop
Lane.
3- The development shall be responsible for extending the existing
outlet into Pond LP -63 to its normal water level.
4. All sanitary and storm sewer lines which were previously
designated as private lines are required to be televised and
their existing condition determined' to be acceptable to City
standards prior to the City accepting the line as a public
facility and assuming perpetual maintenance responsibilities.
5- Staff advises the development to abandon the existing 6" water
main which connects the existing 6" water main in Hilltop Lane
with the existing water main along the common lot lines between
proposed Lots 2 and 3. This elimination will require the
necessary looping connection to the existing water main in
Berry Ridge Road.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B_ Easements and Rights-of-Wa
.1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water.
elevation necessitate -i by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to.final plat approval.
. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development- shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
(OVER) ?I?--
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval:
E. Permits
a s
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Approved:
Revised:
STANDARD
LTS=2
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
93
If
MINNESOTA
SOIL AND WATER
DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Farmington Professional Building
821 Third Street
Farmington. MN 55024
1 y•
Phone: (612)463.8626
CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
Zlovember 6, 1987
TO: `like Foertsch
City of Eagan r ,/ ,✓
FROM: Lynn Chakoian t -t � u
Dakota County JPJCD
RE: Alpine Court 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat Review.
BACKGROUND:
A preliminary plat proposal for alpine Court 2nd Addition
was submitted for erosion and sediment control review.
Grading, Drainage and Utility Plans were provided; an
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has not been submitted.
SOIL AND WATER REVIEW:
Soil Resources
The soils on this proposed site have been disturbed during
previous construction. Therefore no accurate soils
information is at our disposal at the time of this review.
Water Resources
The pond LP -63 is immediately downstream of this
construction site. It is a deep marsh that has a mat of
vegetation covering half its area. Protecting this Pond
from sediment deposition will pose a major challenge during
active construction.
A related challenge is the landscape position of the
construction site in relation to retaining walls downslope
from the proposed site. Increased stormwater runoff
quantity and velocity could pose a hazard to these existing
structures.
1) We recommend a-ternnnorary sediment basin be
constructed on this site to safely outlet runoff and
trap sediments. This basin should be designed by a
Professional engineer because of the potential risks to
property. The location of the basin and the outlet
detail should be presented on the plan.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL:
)f
`10 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been submitted.
The plan should follow the "Checklist" and "General
Criteria" and be comprised of a site man and a narrative.
Some specific information follows that may be useful in
pre-oaration of the olan.
2) Lot benching will be an important erosion control
practice in this situation. Lot benching is a grading
practice that directs drainage into the hill and
towards the street. This shortens slope length and
will aid in controlling the drainage problem.
The grading olan submitted reflects the lot benching
feature. A benching detail sttouli be provided on the
Lrosion Control Plan to further demonstrate how the
drainage should not be allowed to flow from lot to lot.
3) Seeding and :nulchinq this site will be required to
assist in reducing sediment damage downstream. Seeding
specifications should be provided on the plan.
4) The location(s) of rock construction entrance(s)
should be shown on the plan. This will minimize :mud
trac;;ing onto the paved roacds along this development.
5) Silt fence should be shown on the plan where sheet
flow runoff will impact areas off site. This practice
should be used to help keep sediment from entering
Berry Ridge Road and Hilltoo Lane.
6) The construction schedules should be detailed on
the plan. Include that the sediment basin construction
will occur before rough grading proceeds.
7) The individual responsible for maintenance of
erosion control practices should be included on the
plan.
Conclusions
We recommend that the Preliminary Plat be approved, but that
an Erosion an:? Sediment Control Plan be submitted and the
serious drainage concerns be addressed before a grading
permit is issued or final plat approval.
cc: Arcon Construction
Greg Brick, Probe Engineering
96
SITE
ZONING
LAND USE
09
FAME
A
-4 1 . LAKE
PARK
'77-2 1 P Kar
I
S,999,�L;E Ip '
- z
NoF
R- PD,
-i v riT
ll
!BP
ERRY PAT
.-m.H . 1 B
; PARK
^'a
Z 9
Zo
9
'ZZ
� G1
(�- r
�0
IJ
° �. ,'per � ■
i • P
I.e i ESTATES
e I'AlI1
es 74 reS
L
COUNTY STATE .41D 1116pilfoy . /v,7 30 MIACZ EY ofkULP
lob
0
i �3zm
�
`
m
afr
3
y�C
I
A
COUNTY
M
rr-
h
t=9
n
f�. rP.Y
l,
giES r4 7'ef-S
! ` I 1 6 / fit• �3�— eha Y� i
\�{1�•,� ,�•:� �f � � ,fie 1= I I��/ �e! +� �7s.=-.�,rr __�
1 y.
e 1
\t
sr
S _
n `
STATE A/D 11A;1-11,foYj` M2 347 Off, -LEY A24D}
I
I � i
le "i ESTATE -S
I
I
x
(DIrFL hT ROAD)
9mNhb
0" >
`
mc,
no Q
0 � v G7 Z
I
MTZ����I
IWO
��',
O
bb�
�
� an
y
�
I
I
I
x
(DIrFL hT ROAD)
��',
O
bb�
�
� an
y
�
I
///LLTa�P E57.•fTES
I
I
GDUKTY
STATE ATD HiGlgw.4y Nc^. 30
I
I
x
(DIrFL hT ROAD)
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
EDWARD McMENOMY - WAIVER OF PLAT
The next public hearing was called in regard to the application
of Edward McMenomy for waiver of plat in order to split 22.06
Agricultural acres in two separate parcels with different ownership
containing 5.81 and 16.25 acres, located in the northeast quarter of
Section 36, west of Highway 13. Mr. Runkle indicated that in
addition, the applicant was required to incorporate a 3.5 acre and
16 foot by 410 foot strip into the 16.25 acre Parcel. He advised
that staff had determined that it might be premature to require
replatting of the property as the 5.8 acre site presently included a
homestead.
Mr. Paul Steer was present on behalf of Mr. McMenomy to respond
to questions. There was no on-- from the public.
Gustafson moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. The 16 by 410 foot strip, the 16.25 acre parcel and the 3.51
acres abutting Dodd Road shall be combined into a single parcel.
2. No building permits or site development shall occur until
platting takes place on the 20+ acre parcel.
All voted affirmatively.
BERRY RIDGE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT, REZONING
AND COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
Chairperson Wilkins then convened the next public hearing of the
evening in regard to the applications of Arcon Construction,
requesting a rezoning of 1.47 R-3 (townhouse) acres into two
separate R-1 and R-2 districts containing 3 single family lots and
one duplex lot, respectively,,a preliminary plat of Berry Ridge
Addition, and a Comprehensive Guide amendment. Mr. Runkle described
the proposed along Berry Ridge Road on an un3eveloped portion of the
Hilltop of Eagan condominium plat.
Mr. Scott Johnson of Arcon Construction was present and
indicated agreement with all conditions except condition 5 and
proposed that the developer could provide 7 1/2 feet cover over the
watermain.
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
Ms. Buffy Mobroten of 1301 Berry Ridge Road, indicat,2d that she
was representing the adjacent Homeowners Association for single
family homes, and requested that the Commission consider requiring
the applicant to impose restrictions similar to the covenants
applicable to the association, specifically stating that their
covenants provided square footage restrictions with minimums of
1,300 square feet for single story, and 1,500 square feet for two-
story homes. She also requested that rental units not be allowed,
that homes be of similar market value, and that a berm be installed
to separate the single family homes from the condominium units.
Mr. Johnson indicated that they would try their best to comply
with the covenants once reviewed. He also advised that they
envisioned comparable valued homes with berming separating the area
from the condominium units.
McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the rezoning. All voted yes.
McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the Comprehensive Guide amendment. All voted in favor.
McCrea moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. The driveway for Lot 4 shall connect to Berry Ridge Road and
a 20 foot setback shall be allowed if desired along Hilltop Lane.
3. The development shall be responsible for extending the
existing outlet into Pond LP -63 to its normal water level.
4. All sanitary and storm sewer lines which were previously
designated as private lines are required to be televised and their
existing condition determined to be acceptable to City standards
prior to the City accepting the line as a public facility and
assuming perpetual maintenance responsibilities.
5. The developer shall abandon the existing 6 inch water 'ain
which connects the existing 6 inch water main in Hilltop Lane with
the existing main along the common lot lines between proposed lots 2
and 3, or assure the City that 7 1/2 feet of earth. cover shall be
maintained over the water main.
6. Staff approved berming shall be required along the southerly
ends of Lots 1, 2, and 3.
7. The developer has agreed to restrict construction in accord
with the covenants of the neighboring single family homeowners
association.
All voted yes.
/�Z__ -.
14
Agenda Information Memo
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT/DONALD CHRISTENSON
L. Preliminary Plat for Donald Christenson, Buffer Hills 2nd
Addition for Lot 5, Buffer Hills Addition into Four Single Family
Lots on 2.1 Acres --A public hearing was held by the Advisory
Planning Commission to consider a preliminary plat application that
would replat Lot 5, Buffer Hills Addition into four single family
lots on 2.1 acres located south of Crestridge Lane and east of Pilot
Knob Road. The APC is recommending approval of this item.
For a copy of the Planning and Engineering Departments reports,
refer to page(s)I� a- .
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page ,
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON TRIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat for Donald Christenson to replat Buffer Hills 2nd
Addition by creating four single family lots on Lot 5, Buffer Hills
Addition.
.
Is
166
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (BUFFER HILLS 2ND ADDITION)
APPLICANT: DONALD CHRISTENSON
LOCATION: SW 1/4, SECTION 15
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 SINGLE FAMILY
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a
Preliminary Plat for the Buffer Hills 2nd Addition. This 2.1 acre
plat will replat Lot 5 of the Buffer Hills Addition into 4 single
family lots located south of Crestridge Lane - just east of Pilot
Knob Road.
The Buffer Hills Addition was approved in 1978 for 7 single family
lots and a townhouse unit on Lot 4. Currently, there are homes on
Lots 2, 3, 4 (townhome), 5 (the Christenson home), and 7. This
proposal creates 3 additional lots all exceeding R-1 Code Standards.
They contain 12,724 SF, 14,700 SF and 27,400 SF. All setback
requirements for the existing home meet code requirements. Lot 2,
the largest lot, has frontage on Fish Lake and will be subject to
the City's Shoreland Ordinance. The 3 proposed lots are heavily
wooded with pines and appear rather secluded from the commercial
property on the north side of Crestridge Lane. Undeveloped
agricultural parcels are to the east.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: No lot grading is proposed as a
part of this preliminary plat application.
The development is proposing to construct storm sewer to intercept
the runoff generated and convey it to Fish Lake. The proposed Fish
Lake outlet is to be constructed to the NWL and adequately sized to
handle approximately 7 cfs.
No erosion/sediment control plan was submitted as a part of this
application. See attached recommendations by Dakota County Soil and
Water Conservation District.
UTILITIES: Water service of sufficient capacity is readily
available in Crestridge Lane. The development is responsible for
providing water service to all the proposed lots and providing the
water service to the easterly boundary of the proposed plat for
future extension through the easterly adjacent property.
Sanitary sewer service is readily available from an existing 15"
trunk sanitary -sewer line along the north side of Fish Lake. The
development proposes to connect a lateral sanitary sewer to the -
existing trunk and is responsible for providing sanitary sewer:-'
service to all proposed lots. /D
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access -to the proposed development is
readily available from Crestridge Lane and Crestridge Court.
Crestridge Court is presently a platted street but not constructed
to City standards. Street construction, as well as utility
construction, will either be accomplished privately by the developer
or petitioned for and ordered by Council action to be constructed
under a City contract prior to final plat approval.
The question of street access being provided to the easterly
adjacent property has been reviewed. The developer has provided an
alternate lot configuration showing this easterly extension of
Crestridge Court. The easterly extension seems to provide the best
flexibility for the development of the easterly adjacent property.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Sufficient street right-of-way for
Crestridge Court was previously dedicated in the platting of Buffer
Hills 1st Addition.
A 30 foot wide easement along the lot line common to proposed Lots 1
and 2 is required for the proposed parallel storm and sanitary
sewers in that location. A 20 foot wide easement is required for
the easterly extension of the proposed watermain.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
ASSESSMENTS: The proposed site has been previously assessed for
sanitary sewer trunk and water area trunk under Project #58 and
storm sewer trunk under Project #238.
There are no pending assessments of record and the following
assessment is proposed as a condition of final plat approval:
DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
Lateral Benefit Trunk
Sanitary Sewer $15.06/FF 235 FF $3,539
Total Proposed Assessment $3,539
The final assessment amount will be determined using the rates in
effect at the time of final plat approval and based on final plat
dimensions and areas.
CONDITIONS:
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. Lot 2 shall be subject to the City's Shoreland Ordinance.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
S•
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights -of -Way
.1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
'- easements cen-tered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitatet_1 by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer- in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to.final plat approval.
r 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development- shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City- engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
(OVER) /441
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval:
E. Permits
T. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition -
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved:
Revised:
r
STANDARD �61
LTS=2
r
SITE
ZONING
LAND USE
f/RE cc
170"1
! d'IE—A r
}-- a ,,
D1� f
WAM
a
0 °� o
0 0
o
V
PRELIMINARY PLAT
BUFFER HILLS
SECOND. ADOMot-4
J
•M rwwwr M 1... 1 ^M .y
R.^wr.1 l
�w
� r .w w r�r.�.
&.r1.I I...r. � r• R.& -was
D.r.'.
W�
r
Z
O
2
m
Ln
D
0
0
TRI-UkND INC.
PLANNERS ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS
7VRN cufrRE EaK�I 8lJ - "TE 202
�: N0 +A tir
17 , r 1.4E50:• S712S .6121{25-7050
TRI -LAND INC.
3
�;
BUFFER HILLS
••^-•-•---��—• «+�
L••.wry• L.•• Lam.•... �.. ."
,V
b*
SECOND ADDITION
••-•••��•M r—...I..
PLANNERSENGINFERS
o
I
G
PRELIMINARY GRADINC-i
!
�
'"
C6
'
UTILITY PLAN
r N
rNM.
SURVEYORS
y.
J .w.•h r. "aft p[15
7VA7i Q7f�� PO $liiE 2M1?6- E mo
?
pN,
iM^rar.,EEO^M
ELGAM, Y.M'LJDTL 55113 (612)425-78 50
/I 1
LA
m
0
0
z
v
m
v
�
�
r
Z
TO
I V
Z
m
03
C
9
m
r
r
LA
m
0
0
z
v
BUFFER HILLS 2nd ADD.
4'"m 0> S r t i SEE. M
Iw woM1
. I J r.J i MCI LI.
—Ta —
O
Ix
m
0
z
Y
ao.00 I aow
D I
0.1
.1
iw.w • E1Jw I
I II I
I
=I
� s ;I 7 i
r— — — Ieaaa — — sse•.a 6o c -- —
0
i
± %b
M60093--- EAST
1 4W ^
30
a�
J
0
:e
r I
iB SURVEY I�
gd
5
I
UTILITV
r— __ 1••� fTl ryy�� I
3URVE► LIME_
DRAIGE
g FIS NA ` —
s IwrEa
ELEV ` y\ \\EASEMENT `� c R
n! asq. Ie71 • 0611. ap /? A >� • R
I5000 NORTH 6500 0600 S\
S89'48'50'E 300.00 EAST
111 rte' KNOE, lIr-1^1 IC ICT PQL
^:
I• 1 L.tI I I L I VG d utility
U1� �I I B aEMOswaa6 LTOP wroe6wT Fo"N Soc LTIETMI, �c LAME
Drainage and IIt111ty Oda eAento are 36Oft LAST of ro So SI ELL, aM N TT. w SL. NG V.O. Ieia)
shorn thus: 1 I
LOCATION MAP
Being 5 feet in width, unless SEG IS, TWP 27, RGE. 23
HORTFI othervlse Sndloated, snd
adjoining lot linea, and 10 - ••�r •�'•�
.. fact in width and adJoining
street lines, as shown on the plat Mrs/6 NE I/.
v SANITARY SEWER TRUNK
LATERAL BENEFIT -235'
1117--
0
City of eagan SANITARY SEWER
PUBLIC
WORKS
co
15rr VI� I ADDITION,/,,li J I ;,/:'ems _ N —to
.
1 _ /
I ,t
FOX
RIDGE ,( !/.
•.�1y�J11j�4? I ...__..1L''�N —E
N - V _
E ROADPr, �.�CO
'--��PJAL i W i
-27
(• HEIGH.S 12 UbfARk11 _
�T � D
C H 2-
? ® I I o9 ADDITION
_
PILOT KNOB _I
t �/ I ��
�12 I�'r' w`4, KwD_Di
E� ( S �h I'4AILS
_-Ile .-� Y _'•^_•III nIL:� N 51 (3:T—]F–
rr _ L .lriA S
u AC _ 5 _ ' ca iiL} '' Op 1''1 C
I
CITY
I! HALL
331' I
A
i GLACKHANK
Q2) 'ca
' 33
-:C=J - -
I
'� 33 2�1
tl A
27„
J'
C — K
n`1 I
C—H I
:NO.2
sKovz'
r_r C_ N N -
�=.1- /l
1 12E
ADG, �rIZS 4100P 61
�T2
F-71
SUFFER HILLS 2nd
SUBJECT PARCEL
DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN
PA'RICtC
EAGAN
a j
PARK
FIG.. �2
approved: standard
plate #:
MINNESOTA
SOIL AM) WATER
DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
November 9, 1987
To: Mike Foertsch
City of Eagan '
From: Lynn Chakoian
Dakota Counter Sr CD
Re: suffer tills 2nd Addition
Background:
Farmington Professional Building
821 Third Street
Farmington. MN 55024
Phone: (612) 4638626
A preliminary plat oror.osal for Buffer ;dills 2nd Addition
was submitted for erosion and sediment control review.
Grading, Drainage and Utility Plans were arovi-ea; an
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has not been sub•nitted.
Soil and Water Review:
Soil Resources
The soils on this
Mahtomedi colllplex
suitable for the
Water Resources
site are tCingsley (342) and Kingsley
(396F.). These are sandy loam soils
proposed land use.
This development is on Fish Lake and has a storm sewer
outfall proposed to enter Fish Lake. Although the
development is small, the stormsewer construction will
probably increase nutrient loading to Fish Lake and
adversely affect the Lake water quality. During utility
construction and "home building several erosion and sediment
control measures need to be implemented to reduce
sedimentation in Fish Lake. These practices are outlined in
the next section of this review.
Erosion and Sediment Control:
No Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been submitted.
The plan should follow the "Checklist" and ''General
Criteria" and be comprised of a site map and a narrative.
Some specific information follows that may be useful in
preparation of the plan. //
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY tMPLOYER
1) Construction schedules for utility installation needs
to be-Orcvided on the plan. These schedules will
impact what erosion control practices will be rec*uired.
At a minimum silt fence will be needed along Fish Lake
and, de?:�endin(,r on the schedules, a temporary sediment
tray_ may be re-xuired.
2) Give seeding specifications for areas disturbed by
utility construction.
3) Provide for outlet protection at the storm seiner
outfall.
4) After utilities are in and the road is paved, ho=ne
building erosion control will ne=ed to be implemented.
This is especially imrortant given that the plan does
not inc;icate that lots will be brought to final grade
during street construction.
The following are practices co;nxonly used during home
building-
-Show the placement of silt fence on lots and where
soil stocr,piles will be located.
-Show roci{ construction .gads that .)roviae access to
lots for hone building crews. This practice li:rits mud
tracking on the street and sediment loading into the
storm sewer and 7ish Lake.
5) The individual responsible for maintenance of the
erosion control practices should be included on the
plan.
Conclusions
We recommend that the Prelimrinary Plat be approved, but that
an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan be submitted and the
hone building concerns be addressed before a grading permit
is issued or Final Plat approval.
cc Donald Christenson
Brad Swenson, Tri -Land
1l6
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
BUFFER HILLS 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
Chairperson Wilkins next convened the public hearing on the
application of Donald Christenson for preliminary plat of Buffer
Hills 2nd Addition consisting of a 2.8 acre plat resulting from a
replat of Lot 5 of the Buffer Hills Addition into 4 single family
lots, located south of Crestridge Lane, just east of Pilot Knob
Road. Mr. Runkle indicated that the Buffer Hills Addition was
approved in 1978 for 7 single family lots and a townhouse unit on
Lot 4. Currently, there are homes on lots 2, 3, 4 and 5 (the
Christenson home) and Lot 7. The proposal would create 3 additional
lots, all exceeding R-1 Code standards, with the sizes of 12,724
square feet, 14,700 square feet, and 27,400 square feet.
Mr. Bra3 Swenson appeared on behalf of the applicant and
indicated agreement with the staff report, other than not extending
the water main from the cul-de-sac between two lots to the east.
There was no one from the public present. He also indicated it
is anticipated there is no further subdivision of the 27,000 square
foot lot.
Mr. Foertsch did request that the water main extension be
considered a third condition.
Mr. Christenson indicated that he was retiring and could not
sell the existing large lot. Further, he did not want to be loaded
down with the additional'improvement. In response to questions, he
indicated that lots 1 and & were duplex lots, which he intended to
access to Crestridge Lane with garages to the north, providing a
buffer to the commercial development to the north.
McCrea moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. Lot 2 shall be subject to the City's Shoreland Ordinance.
All voted in favor.
Gii%JftNUabL L;LNTLX INDUSTRIAL PARK 9TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
REZONING, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
& CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
The final public hearing of the evening was then called by
Chairperson Wilkins in regard to the separate applications of Opus
Corporation requesting a rezoning of 7.8 LI (Light Industrial) and
/1AK9
15
Agenda Information Memo
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT/REZONING/CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS/OPUS CORP.
M. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat for 33.8
Limited Industrial and GB Acres, Rezoning of 8.38 LI and GB Acres to
Roadside Business Planned Development District and a Conditional Use
Permit for a building in excess of 35 feet and a Pylon Sign Located
South of Lone Oak Road and West of Lexington Avenue --Separate
applications have been submitted by the Opus Corporation requesting
a rezoning of 7.8 LI and GB acres to roadside business planned
development district and a preliminary plat of 33.7 acres that
includes a PD district with the remaining 25.9 limited industrial
acres for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th Addition. This
plat contains six industrial/commercial lots located at the
southeast intersection of Highway 35E and Lone Oak Road adjacent to
the Bulk Mail Facility. Two conditional use permits are necessary
for a pylon sign and building height in excess of 35 feet.
For a co of the Planni g and Engineering Department report, refer
to pagesf through .
For a copy of the APC action, refer to page(s)/A3 �S
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) A
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, 2) preliminary plat entitled
Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th Addition, 3) rezoning of 8.38
LI and GB acres to Roadside Business Planned Development and
4) conditional use permits for building height in excess of 35' and
a pylon sign.
/i7
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE
PLAN AMENDMENT,; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
(EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK 9TH ADDITION)
APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION
LOCATION: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 10
EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) & GB (GENERAL BUSINESS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted
requesting a Rezoning of 7.8 LI and GB acres to a Roadside Business
Planned Development district and a Preliminary Plat of 33.7 acres
that includes this P.D. district with the remaining 25.9 LI acres
for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th Addition. This plat
contains 6 industrial/commercial lots located at the southeast
intersection of Highway 35E and Lone Oak Road adjacent to the Bulk
Mail facility. Two Conditional Use Permits are necessary for a
pylon sign and building height in excess of 35'. The January, 1987
Land Use Plan designates this area Light Industrial, therefore, an
Amendment will be necessary.
DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT: Currently, this site is primarily open
grassland dominated by two large knolls near the intersection of the
two proposed streets. The proposed industrial/commercial land uses
compliment the natural site characteristics since little or no loss
of significant vegetation will occur.
The approximate three acres of General Business zoning on the corner
of Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue would be eliminated with the
7.8 acres of proposed P.D. zoning. The P.D. would cover Lots 1 and
2, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2. The following is a breakdown of each
lot in the 33.7 acre plat.
Block 1
Lot 1 .88 Ac. Class 1 Restaurant
(no liquor)
Lot 2 3.1 Ac. Hotel 123 Room
Lot 3 15 Ac. Health Club or High
Tech Industrial
Block 2
Lot 1 3.8 Ac. Office or Retail
Lot 2 3.1 Ac. Office
Lot 3 3.3 Ac. Office or High Tech
Industrial
lf�
4,862 S.F.
62,932 S.F.
130 - 160,000 S.F.
45,000 S.F.
40,000 S.F.
35,000 S.F. 16.
Other than the hotel and potential supportive retail use on Lot 1,
Block 2, all proposed uses are permitted in LI districts. Opus
proposes to plat the entire development into marketable building
sites subject to Council review of each building proposal prior to
the issuance of any building permits. 'I,.
The third lot of the P.D. scheduled for future development (Lot 1,
Block 2) will be subject to review by both the APC and Council prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
The focus of this proposal will be a four story, 123 room Hampton
Inn Hotel located adjacent to Highway 35E. This would be the 3rd
hotel within this Eagandale Campus. As with the previous hotels,
Hampton Inns are constructed for a specific market group. The
Compri Hotel was designed with the business traveler in mind, the
Residence Inn for more long term accommodations and the Hampton Inn
with primarily short term accommodations for the economically
concerned traveler.
Hampton Inns are a division of the Holiday Corporation with a
nightly room price in the $40 range. Currently, there are 150
Hampton Inns throughout the country and 300 should be operable by
1990, making them the largest hotel chain in the country. Free
continental breakfasts are provided at all Hampton Inns, however no
other eating or liquor services are available.
While there is a proto-typed exterior look for Hampton Inns, Opus
will require the addition of brick for the infill panels of the
building along with the stucco like textured surface. The dark
bronze mansard roof detail is continued through the entrance canopy
area.
SITE PLAN: All building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements
as well as potential lot coverages for all 6 lots. 138 parking
stalls are required by Code for the hotel - 123 9' wide are
proposed, however, there is proof of parking for an additional 18
spaces if necessary. The typical Hampton Inn provides one space per
room. No shortage is anticipated based upon comparisons with other
metropolitan hotels and the 9' stall width was approved at the
Compri Hotel.
The restaurant site
would allow for
a 4,900 S.F. family oriented
facility that would
not serve liquor.
The Hampton Inn group
will
control this lot and
hopes to request
Council approval in the
near
future if the rezoning and platting applications
are approved.
Opus
anticipates the 6 lot
plat to be fully
developed in a 3-5 year
time
period.
AIRPORT NOISE: This site is located in Airport Noise Zone 4 and
therefore subject to NLR (Noise Level Reductions) as monitored by
the Metropolitan Council. Since the construction of hotels is
generally of a high standard, they are a permitted use in all three
zones even closer to the airport subject to an interior NLR of 20
decibels. The City Inspections Department and Met Council will
review the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to _
ensure compliance with that requirement. '
III
SIGNAGE: A 25' tall interior lighted pylon sign near Hwy 35E
contains 180 S.F. of signage area but would advertise both the
Hampton Inn and restaurant site. The Council could deem this
project a "Major Complex" and approve all signage as proposed with
no specific variances. An 18' tall 100 S.F. pylon at the entry to
the hotel will serve that site only, as will a ground sign (7 - 8
feet tall) for the restaurant site at its private entry from Hampton
Way. Individual 8' tall ground signs will help direct individuals to
either the: restaurant or hotel. All signage, architecturally
compatible, will be very important to the vehicular circulation in
this development since primary access will be limited to Lone Oak
Road and channeled towards Lexington Avenue on the east and
eventually to the south.
LANDSCAPING: Preliminary landscape plans have been reviewed with
staff and are consistent with previously approved Opus projects.
Detailed plans for the hotel and retaurant site will be approved as
customary with the final submission.
4W s
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The existing topography of the
proposed development ranges from a high point elevation of 932 in
the central portion of proposed Lot 3, Block 2, to a low point
elevation of app oximately 864 in the southeasterly corner of
proposed Lot 2, Block 2. The grading plan calls for proposed
building elevations of 890 in the easterly portion of this site to a
proposed first floor elevation of approximately 904 in Lot 2, Block
1. These proposed building elevations result in cuts and fill areas
across the site in excess of 30'.
Areas of grading beyond the boundaries of the plat will require a
slope easement from the affected property.
The existing storm sewer system on Lone Oak Road and Lexington
Avenue in the areas immediately adjacent to the proposed plat are
presently at capacity. No runoff generated by this development will
be allowed to flow directly into the storm sewer in Lone Oak Road
and Lexington Avenue. Only the street and boulevard areas of Lone
Oak Road and Lexington Avenue can be allowed to drain into the
existing storm sewer systems in their respective right-of-ways.
At a point approximately 100' south of the south line of the
development, the existing Lexington Avenue storm sewer capacity
increases to approximately 70 CFS. At that point, the existing flow
into the storm sewer system is approximately 50 CFS which leaves
approximately 20 CFS available capacity in the existing 42" storm
sewer.
A detailed analysis of the capacity of Pond DP -3 has determined that
the pond has adequate capacity to handle direct runoff from
approximately 19 acres of the proposed 33.7 acre development. The
remaining 14.7 acres can discharge directly into Pond DP -19. The
routing of 19 acres of direct runoff into Pond DP -3 and 14.7 acres
of direct runoff into Pond DP -19 eliminates the need for any onsite
ponding. However, if the 14.7 acres of runoff is ponded and
discharged at a rate of 1 CFS, then Pond DP -3 is adequately sized to
handle the entire 33.7 acre development. The problem with the
entire site discharging into Pond DP -3 is that the existing 42"
storm sewer in Lexington Avenue is undersized to handle the flow.
The development will be responsible for providing the adequately
sized outlets to the ponding areas - be it Pond DP -3, DP -19, or
both.
An existing 12" storm sewer force main which provides the outlet for
Pond DP -3 on the Bulk Mail site presently drains across the south
side of Lot 3, Block 1.
An incomplete erosion and sediment control plan was submitted with
the preliminary plat application. The main water quality concern of
this site is the effect the development will have on LeMay Lake.
Prior to discharging into LeMay Lake, the storm water will pass
through Ponds DP -3 and DP -19. The nutrient removal efficiencies of
these ponds will. need to be determined in order to ensure that
excessive nutrient loading to LeMay Lake will not occur as a result
of the site development.
a-1
Site drainage during construction and prior to storm sewer
installation will be to the east along Lone Oak Road and to the
southwest along I -35E. Proper erosion control measures need to be
implemented to prevent sediment from moving offsite to Pond DP -19
and from there to LeMay Lake. .l,
UTILITIES: Trunk water main of sufficient size and capacity is
readily available in Lone Oak Road as well as Lexington Avenue. The
City of Eagan's Water Supply and Distribution Plan calls for a 12"
trunk water main being extended from the existing 16" water main in
Lone Oak Road, along the east side of I -35E and extending this water
main southerly to its ultimate connection with the existing trunk
water main in Yankee Doodle Road. This proposed 12" trunk water
main is intended to serve all of the property between Lone Oak Road
and Yankee Doodle Road, east of I -35E, and west of Lexington Avenue.
The lots in this development can then take their water service
directly from the proposed trunk line. The lateral connection
between the proposed 12" trunk water main in Hampton Drive and the
existing 18" trunk water main in Lexington Avenue will be required
to provide adequate water service.
Sanitary sewer service of sufficient capacity and depth is available
along the easterly side of Lexington Avenue. The proposed sanitary
sewer lateral extensions along Hampton Drive and Hampton Way are
required to be of sufficient depth and capacity to serve the area to
the south of the proposed development.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to the proposed
development is shown in two locations. The proposed Hampton Drive
connection to Lone Oak Road will be allowed as a right -in right -out
only connection. The Hampton Way connection to Lexington Avenue
will be allowed full access.
Hampton Drive and Hampton Way both require 70' right-of-ways and a
40' wide face -of -curb to face -of -curb pavement. Hampton Drive is
proposed to be stubbed to the southerly adjacent property. A
temporary cul-de-sac will be required to be constructed at the south
end of Hampton Drive.
The development proposes to take specific site accesses to Hampton
Drive and Hampton Way in locations which are opposite one another
and properly spaced.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Slope easements will be required
from adjacent properties where the proposed grading exceeds the
limits of the proposed development. The proper utility easement
will be required for service lines which serve more than one user.
The appropriate ponding easements are required for Pond DP -3, Pond
DP -19 and any onsite ponding areas.
Hampton Way and Hampton Drive are required to have 70' right -of ways
dedicated. The County will require a 75' half right-of-way
dedicated along Lone Oak Road and a 60' half right-of-way along
Lexington Avenue. Restricted access is required to the lots along
the entire boundary of Lone Oak Road and Lexington Avenue.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
I2- 7-
ASSESSMENTS: The parcels that are proposed to be platted have been
assessed for the following: Water trunk area, water availability,
sanitary sewer trunk, storm sewer trunk, lateral benefit from trunk
water main and Lexington Avenue street a�spessments at 45% of the
actual cost. I.
The proposed site is subject to a pending storm sewer trunk
assessment under Project 372.
The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat
approval:
PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QTY AMT
28 Lateral Benefit Trunk
Water Main
$20.55/ff
737.62 ff
$15,158
Lone Oak Road
82.37/ff
892.62
ff
73,525
104 Lexington Avenue
Upgrade
45.30/ff
817
ff
37,010
104 Lexington Avenue
37.07/ff
200
ff
7,414
104 Lateral Benefit Trunk
Storm Sewer
10.39/ff
1,237
ff
12,852
Trailway
12.40/ff
784.62
ff
22,129
TOTAL
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
$168,088
The final assessment amount will be determined using rates in effect
at the time of final plat approval and based on final plat
dimensions and areas.
r13
CONDITIONS (EAGANDALE 9TH ADDITION):
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
1 s.
2. A planned development agreement shall be entered into for the
three lots and the length of the P.D. shall be determined with
this plat.
3. All signage as proposed shall be approved and subject to the
$2.50 S.F. one time sign fee.
4. Lot 1, Block 2 shall be reviewed/approved by the APC and
Council prior to the issuance of the building permit.
5. The parking stall number and size shall be approved as per the
site plan for the hotel.
6. All mechanical equipment and trash enclosures shall be
screened or incorporated into the building design constructed
with the same material as the building.
7. The development is responsible for providing the properly sized
storm sewer outlets to Ponds DP -3 and DP -19 as needed to serve
the proposed development.
/z�
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Riqhts-of-Wa
_1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development- shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City. engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
( OVER ) IZ5
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design statidrds.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
s
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition -
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved:
Revised:
STANDARD %14
LTS=2 1
SITE
ZONING
LAND USE
LOME
4,
EAGANDAqc--::--. TrR
H 140 Z
LONE
T,
A KaAi? arc
FF
- E
In
Co
Al
l t b
ZN
ti
41 11V
J
- �- u •%-- _ EX/NGTON—
.gym— ��•..., s.... L
M nDWMMOAK WK;
� a�c�w a., urxlr�r rub}, — ' � • ' f z/ '�!'''S!"!""'�"�' _ :: _, �i
4�?R
04
O t
Z
m
0
0
8
mm =)D. m� ',P 9= 0�� ��50 0 �
pn � ((9'� f-4 p0(-04� oo gg
�00pptCl) (A
QQ
Cl)
m0-
q
i i
m .Aa v m (�A- W ,Ni A yV (A�l co pi 0
. N atR En mo of WONT 2R'tn Cl) Ny j
.... HAMPTON INN
P j ,,. EAGAM MWNESOTA """" '""" OPUS CORPORATION
SITE PLAN °11`.... ""' CEEAGNFj$• elms• oev9.OPERS
~►Olw 150,MwwoollL MN 65.�01ll tl p�}4N4
i
Iz
0
U
—44a�
o•
o
o
000010001=
i Ad t'. �� Caw "eo a
0
Qao
Mn t -
p
m � s m
O
HAMPTONINN �_-- •--• �• +-- .�...+
PZ twEAOAK MINNESOTA w c.�..... OPUS CORPORATION
o..o n n... �.- �� � oFcr�.s_RS- atDEFS- DEVELJ PE S
LANDSCAPE PLAN,
/�� PO ew 15G. Mw—o&& uN 534401812)63644"
IIIIIIIIIIf-� ,
0
s♦..,W y
II
.Z
I p • � �1
m
.P
L
0
p
;
t�
,.
';Ii�1iiilf I
I�It
�i�s�(P1l
0
L
1
0
'
m
m
U)
r
m
rn
O
N
Z
.Z
I p • � �1
t[r �rat■�1��1��
;
t�
,.
';Ii�1iiilf I
.Z
I p • � �1
0
i
HAMPTON INN
P9 EAGAN, MINNESOTAF`i OPUS CORPORATION
DCSK�f�• euLDET-s- OEVELOPErs
SIGN ELEVATIONS �� »•/ �/} /I
Foeo.1w.Ml—oft wNae+.wa1x1aae4a.+
t�
,.
';Ii�1iiilf I
I�It
�i�s�(P1l
0
i
HAMPTON INN
P9 EAGAN, MINNESOTAF`i OPUS CORPORATION
DCSK�f�• euLDET-s- OEVELOPErs
SIGN ELEVATIONS �� »•/ �/} /I
Foeo.1w.Ml—oft wNae+.wa1x1aae4a.+
r• 3t�t I+� •1r�
•� 'L C[ dr
ri
r
Im
4
2
HAMPTON INN
P5 EAGAN, M*R&SOTA "^" �� �... OPUS CORPORATION
,r
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS '.�.... �... aFs-eLwE`s oEvacrIss
/313
"illlllllle
I
I
I
I
I �
I
aG• cr
56'6"
HAMPTON INN y'
EAGAN, MINNESOTA " ' 'r"
P3 ��S� r°�UL� DEVE�RS
FIRST FLOOR PLAN•�� �.•..
roe..na.w+w�..w.�swn�iivaa...wrm�...a..u�..,,....nnwm�.�.ima..o Mc...r...r..�,..,�uarravrn�roao
---2e.47-
Lcl
Lq L-A
25.4"
HAMPTON INN ;6
P8 EAGAN, MINNESOTA OPUS CORPORATION
+r o.. —xd A -W DESK3r-4EF:tS-BLX
TYPICAL ROOM LAYOUTS
12� PO. Box 154 Mm—o0x. MN SS4401612193644"
x
r
RA
if_
SMOO
:.. SCALES / /NCH 30 FEET
s2>.
f }�
s CINE• ?�6.• �/` _
4• 1{' 0
1 .
a
m r
N I =
y m
_ � o
m
N 1
n � �
C rrNNr7;yP
Zn02nm yy
Irl=111. y111TDNm2
p
OVaSOr CM
�lP �D Dy •�pp
ND�� rO-Ni- D
��ix�Im'tfnrlml ra
BrNnYaiOm$ u I=rVrm
fMX6 $ P ulr v
�AIyOmP'1� $ N(Y
"'lily_ vZZ E �Vml
a=Ym$� Mo
I ^Te- AP�* 1V NN
1 � EAST LINE OF SEL. 10
BS0.00-•.
120000 -.
n N 0 0 n 0 A 0 -)
M m m 7 a
NQ=n 1* -0 ..+VY N O F ,0 NPI a K =O1d S S� •p Ip O
mmm 07n+m +-wm 0�•OO Sr' nO� EmNTna
n + 1n � m '1 v1 c m + � m
N7 Mee n mrr7
-ft 1w -h 0 101 C^u1 O +Kn
m o _mo o ::r m � o � 0,
� p+ �
,m0 c^r �ow'amm�I.m�
1a m > > 1c n a'< r. • n N M 1c s M
oy'n� r'3In,.a�o _ oin ".+n
mO m O+ N cu u1 0• O O rn 3 Y+ D
�Sw� v N
1p O a9 � "lo n o �. ° � r a o Z N fTl
w y m m F 7 ...• a j p^~ m O+ n m 6 0• rr f+l 3
Y m m m ry '1 m m 7 r* l+ C l O 1 7 fl' Oc O
A ng�m?NooJo�o=�O�ID moo nmm vR a0
Z
r 7
!' ��y,t0 ~n OO S po mW Oil l0.D to?��•O�Ovy m
a ��
X 3
Sr >+ otnrv�m^^SoJ22 t "�o'om ni0 -� 7C
a r+ m^ lb n 0 N rt 7 O N O M m j 0.n O m rY ,_ 0 7 m ..,{
[> wyoso mm.m.°�0w'7°^oms �• Cl
Ln
o n •wo n o7w n 0 CM0�3m o
•lil y mn S.r Lo S N- m 7 0 J p 0. 0. ry m
i doom on me m Inmv1 0 0 N O
r= O O H r+
a 7 I.1 S Q
o C S m N O n m
O C � � m m r2
m �r�
N n n 7 N O m In 7 0 O n n 7 N 7 7 O C
w O. r. 1 m10 m ST0.r•1 1 7 •< 7 m N m "'h 0.ID --+5 Sin
A n 0 c 2.1 n n m
Ir
E. 1/4 SEC, 10, T27, R23
BERNARD K LARSON
COUNTY SURVEYOR
OAKCITA COUNTY. mjNm
JANUARY. 1972
F=Ar,At\lr)AI P: r.POTPQ Mini PTmiAl QApV X -a a
PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK WATER MAIN
,197
•BERNARD N.
LARSON
MINTY CORN[ yon
SEC. 10.1 "F27, R 23 DAKOTA COUNTY, MINN
JANUAky. 1979
I I I
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK # 9
PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR
LONE OAK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
E. 1/4 SEC., 10.9 T279 R23
BERNARD K (ARSON
COUNT TSUR W EVOR
DAXOT aCOU". MINN
JANUANV..".
i I I
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK # 9
PROPOSED ASESSMENTS FOR
LEXINGTON AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS UPGRADE
13�? -
BERNARD tt CARSON
• COUNT u E OR
DAKOT
l/A--r SEC* 10, T279 R23 'r 5JR
OU"" Y
Ty, W"4
" '
•IA ... HV. 1979
x
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK -* 9
PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR
.-..,,,..-.LEXINGTON AVENU IMPROVEMENTS
BERNARD R LARSON
COUNTY SUR " EY
E., 1/4 SEC., 10., T279 R23 DAKOTA COU.TTM HN
JANUART. 1979
-i v Al
ml
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK -# 9
PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR
LATERAL BENEFIT
,,ROM STORM SEWER
E. 1/4 sic. I -r27,
R-23
BERNARD K LARSON
COUNTY SUR VEYON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINN
JANUANT. 1979
11
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK -* 9
PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR
TRAIL WAY 1l v
APC Minutes
r November 24, 1987
BUFFER HILLS 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
Chairperson Wilkins next convened the public hearing on the
application of Donald Christenson for preliminary plat of Buffer
Hills 2nd Addition consisting of a 2.8 acre plat resulting from a
replat of Lot 5 of the Buffer Hills Addition into 4 single family
lots, located south of Crestridge Lane, just east of Pilot Knob
Road. Mr. Runkle indicated that the Buffer Hills Addition was
approved in 1973 for 7 single family lots and a townhouse unit on
Lot 4. Currently, there are homes on lots 2, 3, 4 and 5 (the
Christenson home) and Lot 7. The proposal would create 3 additional
lots, all exceeding R-1 Code standards, with the sizes of 12,724
square feet, 14,700 square feet, and 27,400 square feet.
Mr. Bra] Swenson appeared on behalf of the applicant and
indicated agreement with the staff report, other than not extending
the water main from the cul-de-sac between two lots to the east.
There was no one from the public present. He also indicated it
is anticipated there is no further subdivision of the 27,000 square
foot lot.
Mr. Foertsch did request that the water main extension be
considered a third condition.
Mr. Christenson indicated tha t he was retiring and could not
sell the existing large lot. Further, he did not want to be loaded
down with the additional' improvement. In response to questions, he
indicated that lots 1 and 6 were duplex lots, which he intended to
access to Crestridge Lane with garages to the north, providing a
buffer to the commercial development to the north.
McCrea moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. Lot 2 shall be subject to the City's Shoreland Ordinance.
All voted in favor.
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARR 9TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
REZONING, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
& CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
The final public hearing of the evening was then called by
Chairperson Wilkins in regard to the separate applications of Opus
Corporation requesting a rezoning of 7.8 LI (Light Industrial) and
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
GB (General Business) acres to a Roadside Business planned
development district, and a preliminary plat of 33.7 acres, which
would include the PO district and the remaining 25.9 Light
Industrial acres for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th
Addition. Mr. Runkle reviewed the several applications, indicating
the plat would consist of 06 Industrial/Commercial lots located on
the southeast intersection of Highway I -35E and Lone Oak Road,
adjacent to the Bulk Mail facility.
The applicant was now requesting one conditional use permit for
a pylon sign, and one for a building height in excess of 35 feet.
It was proposed that the rezoning would result in better utilization
of the site.
Mr. Bob Worthington of Opus Corporation was present and provided
a brief history of the mixed use concept introduced by Opus some 5
years ago, which would now move forward with a third 'hotel site. He
described the six new lots and the construction of two new major
roads. He indicated it was his understanding that the PD would
require approval of each additional structure, other than the hotel,
which was being requested at this meeting. He also advised the
Commission that 3.1 acres of the total area was already zoned GB.
Mr. Wayne Morris of Oak Leaf Hotel Group, a Tennessee partnership,
provided a brief history of the Hampton Inn and the large numbers
being constructed nation-wide. He indicated that Hampton Inn was a
leader in affordable lodging, nation-wide, providing rooms that cost
$35.00 to $45.00 per night, without restaurant or bar facilities.
Mr. Greg Nuke, architect with Opus Corporation, indicated that
there would be 123 parking stalls, which appeared sufficient in
light of the lack of a restaurant or bar. He indicated that the 4 -
story hotel would be above 35 feet in height and that a 25 foot
pylon sign was being requested along Lone Oak Road. The alternate
entrance would be marked by an 8 foot ground sign.
Mr. Worthington indicated in summary that they worked
extensively with staff and had accepted all conditions proposed.
Ms. Nicki Cole, resident along Lexington Avenue, questioned the
massive grading and removal of trees. Mr. Worthington indicated
that the site would be entirely graded in addition to the
installation of streets, with a boulevard theme that included trees.
He indicated a park -like setting was intended for the development.
The Commission advised that a detailed landscape plan would be
required by the City to insure proper landscaping.
Mr. Mary Rahn requested information as to the location of the
proposed east -west street, relative to his home. It was determined
that his home was a significant distance to the north from that
intersection. Mrs. Cole then questioned the direction of storm run-
off which would be to the west and south.
APC Minutes
November 24, 1987
McCrea moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the rezoning of 7.8 acres from LI and GB to PD. All voted aye.
McCrea moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the Comprehensive Guide Amendment. All voted yes.
Voracek moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat of Lot 2, Block 1, the hotel site. After
discussion, the motion was withdrawn.
Voracek then moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend the
preliminary plat of 33.8 acres, subject to the following conditions:
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. A planned development agreement shall be entered into for
the three lots and the length of the PD shall be determined with
+4his plat.
3. All signage as proposed shalt be approved and subject to the
$2.50 per square foot one time sign fee.
4. The restaurant shall be reviewed and approved by the
Advisory Planning Commission and City Council prior to the issuance
of the building permit.
5. The parking stall number and size shall be approved as per
the site plan for the hotel.
6. All mechanical equipment and trash enclosures shall be
screened or incorporated into the building design constructed with
the same material as the building.
7. The development is responsible for providing the properly
sized storm sewer outlets to Ponds DP -3 and DP -19 as needed to serve
the proposed development.
8. An approved landscaping plan ..shall be submitted prior to
final plat.
All voted in favor.
Gustafson moved,. Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend
approval of one pylon sign, 25 feet in height, and 180 feet of
interior lighted signage, in lieu of two separate pylon signs. All
voted yea.
--McCrea moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit of the construction of the hotel to
allow 4 stories: All voted yes. -
17
Agenda Information Memo
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
�_ DDITIONAL=,'.I.TEMS
PILOT KNOB ROAD/TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EASEMENTS
A. Pilot Knob Road for Temporary and Permanent Easements --Dakota
County Highway Department is requiring both permanent and temporary
easements for the upgrading and construction of Pilot Knob Road for
several City -owned parcels. In exchange for road right-of-way and
easements, the County is willing to convey to the City a ninety-nine
(99) year lease for the Burow home located on the northeast
intersection of Cliff and Pilot Knob Roads. At the December 3, 1987
APRC meeting, action was taken to recommend that the City grant the
necessary permanent and temporary easements to Dakota County and
further that the City reaffirm intention to enter into a lease
agreement for the Burow house with said facility being a sublet to
an athletic associate n for their storage and meeting needs.
Enclosed on pages through A50 is a memo providing
additional explanation on this item.
ACTON TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
granting of temporary and permanent easements for the upgrading and
construction of Pilot Knob Road and further that the City will lease
the Burow home from Dakota County located on the northeast
intersection of Cliff and Pilot Knob Roads and further that the City
will sublease the house to the athletic association to solve its
storage and meeting space needs.
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1987
SUBJECT: PILOT KNOB ROAD - TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EASEMENTS
R A r_Wr.RnrnhM
Dakota County will require both permanent and temporary easements for the
upgrading and construction of Pilot Knob Road from the City for several
parcels now owned by Eagan. In exchange for the road right-of-ways and
easements, the County is willing to convey to the City a ninety-nine (99) year
lease for the Burow home located on the northeast intersection of Cliff and
Pilot Knob Road. In leasing the home, the City would sub -lease the house to
the Athletic Association to solve their storage and meeting space needs.
ADVISORY COMMISSI0'11 REVIEW
At the December 3rd, Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission meeting, Landscape
Architect/Parks Planner, Steve Sullivan, reviewed each of the seven (7)
parcels owned by the City which require both temporary and permanent
easesments. Staff made several recommendations concerning proposed grades,
trail connections, etc., which have been communicated to the County Highway
Department. The Advisory Commission adopted staff's recommendations and have
also included three (3) additional recommendations to City Council, as they
affect two parcels, and one general recommendation. The specific
recommendation for Well Site Park. Staff should develop a revised site plan
for the park, due to the proposed relocation of the access point to this
parcel.
Second, that the Advisory Commission be directed to review alternatives for
the moving of the old township/City hall building which will be required to be
moved, as a result of the project.
The third recommendation is due to the necessary removal of several existing
trees for the widening project, landscape plantings be considered for re-
placement along the roadway as a beautification effort.
1�7
Pilot Knob Road
December 8, 1987
Page Two
ENGINEERING REVIEHAL
Traditionally road right-of-ways are provided by the City at the time of
project reviewal and approval by the City Council. Public Works Director, Tom
Colbert, has indicated that he does not see a problem with the City providing
the requested easements at this time, as it will not hinder the City's
reviewal or approval of the project at a later date.
STAFF CONCERNS
Parks & Recreation Department staff see no problems with the transmittal of
easement agreements at this time; of concern, however, is input of the project
for the utilization of Well Site Park, due to the relocation of the
driveway/road access. The proposed relocation of the access to the north will
undoubtedly impact use of the site for winter skating purposes, as well as the
water department's need to access the existing well and water filling station.
Potential use of this site for a possible water treatment plant for the south
well field, also must also be considered. For this reason, staff feels that a
new site plan must be developed for Well Site Park in conjunction with the
siting of the roadway access to this facility.
FOR COUNCIL ACTION
The Council is requested to approve/deny the transmittal of the road right-of-
way easements to Dakota County at this time.
The Council is also requested to reaffirm their- intent to enter into a lease
agreement for the Burow house, with said facility being sub -let to the
Athletic Association for their storage and meeting needs.
KV/bls
cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works
Kevin Mitchell, President - Eagan Athletic Association
Jerry Kingray - Dakota County Right -of -Way
DAKOTA COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY REPORT
Director of Parks and Recreation and the Landscape Architect stated
that the City has received a request from Dakota County to provide both
temporary and permanent road right-of-way easements with the proposed
construction of Pilot Knob Road. These easements affect several City owned
parcels of which two directly impact parks. Mr. Vraa indicated that upon
return of the easements, the County would be willing to enter into an
agreement for a 99 year lease of the Burow house on Cliff and Pilot Knob
Roads. .This house would then revert to use by the Athletic Association.
Mr. Sullivan then reviewed each of the parcels and responded to
questions. He provided specific information regarding grades, distances and
impact upon the parks. Mr. Martin questioned the point of access for Well
Site Park and its proximity to the open skating area. Mr. Sullivan indicated
that the County is not showing a roadway, only an access apron to the park.
The access location is north of the current access point. This is of concern,
bearing review by the staff and the Commission, because of its impact upon the
park. The Commission then asked several questions regarding the grades,
impact on the skating rink, impact on the well location, the possibility of a
future water treatment plant located on this site. Poor soil problems and
poor conditions of both the hockey rink and present warming house need to be
reviewed.
/0
4
Member Bertz stated that with all the concerns mentioned, safety of
the rink users must be considered too, particularly because of the grades and
access to the park off of Pilot Knob Road. Mr. Caponi stated that there may
be an opportunity to review and make significant changes in the park, noting
that the Director's past indications of the substandard quality of the warming
house and hockey rink should be taken into consideration. Mr. Sames
questioned the amount of flat space beyond the trail near Cliff Road. Mr.
Sullivan stated he will review this as the layout plan does not indicate
proposed grades relative to the road and pathway.
In regards to parcel #42, the former township city hall building, it
will have to be moved. Mr. Caponi questioned the value of the building and if
it indeed had not already lost its historical value as a result of it being
changed and remodeled previously. The Commission had a brief discussion
regarding the township/city hall building, and it was noted that the City
Council has not made a determination of what specifically needed to be done.
It was suggested that a subcommittee of the advisory commission be formed to
follow up on this. Mr. Kubik questioned with the tree removal being proposed
at the former township city hall site and along the roadway, that if this
wasn't an opportunity to transplant and bring into use some new planting
material to upgrade the visual qualities of this roadway. Mr. Carroll added
that the City will be giving up nearly seven acres and that the addition of
trees on a sharing basis is appropriate. Mr. Caponi also stated his
agreement. There was additional discussion and review of the proposed right-
of-way. Upon a motion by Carroll, seconded by Caponi, the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission made the following recommendations to the City Council:
1. Place a 3:1 slope adjacent to Thomas Lake Park, north of the park access
road, provide a connection from the Highline Trail to the Boulevard Trail
across from the Wilderness Run Road/Pilot Knob Road intersection, remove
and replace the driveway apron to Thomas Lake access road to accommodate
proposed road grades.
2. Parcel 12 - provide a park access road from the proposed apron to the
existing parking lot, grade and revise the free skate areas as a result
of the road improvements influencing the existing free skate area,
subject to review by staff and the Advisory Commission.
3. Parcel 14 - that the County revise the legal description for permanent
easement removing the northerly 120 feet of parcel 14.
4. Parcel 42 - the Advisory Commission and City Council create a committee
to review, and make alternative recommendations regarding the historical
value and suitabiity of the old township/city hall building to
accommodate the right-of-way road realignment.
5. Parcel 48 - the City Forester reviewed the possibility of transplanting
trees north of the Fire Administration Building. Further, the City and
the County develop a landscaping plan for the roadway which would provide
for additional and significant tree plantings.
On a vote on a motion, all members indicated in favor.
/.6D
5
Agenda Information Memo
December 17, 1987, City Council Meeting
WILLIAMS BROTHERS PIPELINE '—STBURY ADDITION
B. Williams Brothers Pipeline Company/Westbury Addition --Williams
Brothers Pipeline Company acquired three (3) lots in the Westbury
Addition adjacent to Wescott Road in order to monitor an earlier oil
spill which occurred on this property. Recently, representatives of
the Williams Brothers Pipeline had contacted the City to determine
if there was sufficient interest in the City receiving a donation of
the three lots for park purposes.
In a motion by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission at their
Thursday, December 3 meeting, they recommended to the City Council
that it not seek the donation of the three lots in Westbury under
the current offer submitted by Williams Brothers Company. For
additiona information this item, refer to the attached report on
pages 11Z- through �.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
donation of three (3) lots in Westbury from Williams Brothers
Pipeline with the understanding that the City is responsible for the
payment of assessments in an amount exceeding $17,000.
/51
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1987
SUBJECT: WILLIAM BROS. PIPELINE
BACKGROU9D
Williams Brothers Pipeline Company, the fee/title owner to three (3) lots in
the Westbury Addition (See Attachment). The company acquired these three lots
at the time of the Westbury Addition platting, in order to monitor an earlier
oil spill which occurred on this property. Williams Bros. also maintains a
pipeline easement over a portion of these three lots.
Recently, representatives of Williams Bros. Pipeline contacted the City to
deterLaina if there was sufficient interest in the City receiving a "donation"
of tho three lots for parks purposes.
WILLIAMS BROS. PROPOSAL
Staff nas received a letter from Williams Bros. Company indicating they would
be willing to donate the property in question to the City of Eagan for park
purposas, with conditions. These conditions include:
1. Tncre shall be no permanent structure located on the property, and deep
rooted trees will be prohibited.
2. Access to the property by Williams Bros. Pipeline in the event of a
disruption of service, be retained.
3. The $17,000 of assessments be the responsibility of the City.
ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On Thursday, December 3rd, the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed
the offer by Williams Bros. Pipeline. The Commission reasoned that the use of
the property would be limited, due to its size and location for parks
purposes. Further, the City has already acquired a small parcel on the south
portion of the Westbury Addition, which is intended for a future tot -lot. The
Commission was also concerned about use of the land for other parks purposes
that may be disruptive to the neighborhood, noting that there would only be
street parking.
It was also the consensus of the Advisory Commission that an expenditure of
$17,000 for property of less than an acre in size, with no recognizable need
existing for this parcel; the expenditure was therefore deemed not
/�z
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: DECEMBER 9, 1987
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
"PAY -FOR -VIEW" CABLE TV CHANNEL
Enclosed on pages %o through �� is a memo drafted by
Steve King, Administrative Assistant from the City of Burnsville,
regarding the new "Pay -for -View" cable TV channel that was
discussed briefly by the City Administrator at the last City
Council meeting. The Cable Commission will address this issue at
its next regular meeting which is Monday, December 14 instead of
December 17.
HRA/ASSISTED HOUSING UPDATE
Enclosed on pages through -- is an HRA Status Report
for the month of December regarding Assisted Housing and
Community Development.
OFF-SITE TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN UPDATE
According to Donna Rollins, Sign Inspector, as of July, fifty-two
temporary advertising signs had been removed as a result of the
May 1987 Council action to amend the sign ordinance involving
off-site temporary advertising signs. The Sign Inspector will
continue to monitor signs. It is expected that additional
temporary advertising signs will be removed.
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS REPORT/NOVEMBER 1987
Enclosed on pages � � through is a copy of the November
1987 Protective Inspections Report.
RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Enclosed on page rr is a copy of a letter addressed to the
City of Eagan by Jeff Connell, Director of Planning and Program
Management for Dakota County, that discusses the schedule for
identifying alternative sites for a Resource Recovery Facility.
This office will keep the City Council updated on specific sites
as the County proceeds with its study.
AIR QUALITY ISSUE
Enclosed on pages 1 through / is a memo from Captain
Geagan entitled "Eaga rf Air Quality Issue" and a letter from the
Dakota County Public Health Director to MPCA regarding the air
quality problems at Koch Refinery. It appears that the County is
attempting to correct the odor problems.
X55
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE UPDATE
Enclosed on pages , _� through _1,7g is a copy of the
November 10, 1987 Air ort Relations Committee Minutes and an
Action Summary of the last Committee meeting held on December 8,
1987.
EVALUATION OF 1986 DEER HERD CONTROL PLAN
The City has received correspondence from the United States
Department of the Interior that provides a status of the 1986
Deer Reduction Program. Enclosed on pages/ 7/ through /77
is a copy of their cover letter and the firs-E7p—age of the repo t.
If members of the Council would like additional information
including maps and a statistical breakdown, please notify this
office and additional copies will be reproduced.
I-494 CORRIDOR STUDY SUMMARY
The City has received a final copy of the I-494 Corridor Study
Summary. The first two pages of that summary are enclosed for
your review. If members of the City Council would like a copy of
this document reproduced, please indicate and a copy will be made
available.Lp. /7g 179)
EHLERS NEWSLETTER
Enclosed without page number is a copy of the Ehlers Newsletter
for your review.
ENERGY MANAGEMENT STUDY - WATER SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
As a part of the approved 1987 budget, the City Council
authorized the expenditure of $14,000 to have a special Energy
Management Study performed by Triangle Engineering, Inc.,
to make our water supply and distribution system energy and
economically efficient.
Enclosed on pages Iro� and L_0l is a report from the
Superintendent of Utilities providing the first six months'
results of the implementation of this energy management program.
As can be seen, this program was a huge success in saving
substantial sums of money for the City water system and its
users.
The Public Works Department would like to express its apprecia-
tion to the City Council for its support of this study and
providing the financing necessary to achieve the substantial
savings.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
Draft 12/2/87
New "Pay -for -View" Cable TV Channel will offer Adult -theme Movies
Be advised that "blue" movies, but not hard-core pronography (X-rated),
will be offered on the new "Pay -for -View" Cable Channel 34. Ken Wolf
has received a phoned complaint and others may follow. Some
background:
Prior to December 1, the Burnsville -Eagan cable system included
one "Pay -for -View channel," Channel 35. The offered selections
included sporting events and, primarily, recent movies (e.g.,
"Outrageous Fortune," "Tin Men," "Star Trek IV"). By phone call,
offered selections are ordered for specific dates and times either
by voice request over a rotary dial phone or by push button entry
of a cable subscriber's billing account number.
In September, the Cable Company informed the Cable Commission that
it wanted to make some channel changes by December 1. Part of the
process included getting KXLI-41 onto the system on Cable Channel 39.
Other infrequently viewed stations were proposed to be dropped,
and new offerings were to be added. The Commission was told that
the new offerings would include the Fashion Channel, the Travel
Channel, another over -the -air sales channel; and, another Pay -for
View Channel. Commission discussion of these changes was focused
on the channels proposed for deletion and on the addition of yet
another sales channel. There was little or no discussion of the
programming planned for the new Pay -for -View Channel.
The programming content of the new "Pay -for -View" Channel became
apparent with the delivery of the -December program guide. Most
of the movies are packaged under the "Rendezvous" series name and
/56
-2 -
are unrated "adult-oriented" films, such as "Crocodile Blondee."
Steve has spoken to the Company and been assured that the films
are not hard core, X-rated pornography and are not necessarily as
graphic as other like -titled editions that are available in video
rental shops. The Company maintains that there is a very strong
market for the material.
For lst Amendment reasons, there is virtually no regulatory
recourse for the Commission and cities. Additionally, the current
F.C.C. has voluntarily restricted its regulatory power to those
channels that are broadcast over open airways (e.g., Channels 2,
4, 5, 9, 11, 23, 29, 41) and declined to regulate satellite -
transmitted, cable -fed channels. However, even in the F.C.C.
bailiwick, the trend is to loosen content restrictions. For
example, the F.C.C. recently declared that between midnight and
6 a.m., it will now permit the over -the -air transmission of "adult"
themes and language.
The Cable Company assured Steve that it has a number of safety
features and procedures to help prevent inappropriate access to the
new Pay -for -View Channel by children. Through the "parental
lockout" mechanism, parents can use a key to prevent the converter
box from access to Channel 34. In the alternative, the subscriber
can instruct the Company to program the converter box to deny
all but sporting events on Channel 34. A third available safety
procedure is to deactivate the premium stations on a converter
box and allow selected activation only upon an oral phone call
request (i.e., no push button orders). The theory is that a
Company service representative will recognize the voice of an
147
-3 -
inappropriately young caller. Furthermore, the caller would need
to recite the subscriber's billing account number, which is informa-
tion that can be controlled by the parent.
The programming on the new "Pay -for -View" channel will probably be
raised at the next Commission meeting. At P.. minimum, anger and
dismay are expected over the Company's failure to give any notice
of this new program content. We will keep you posted on additional
developments.
S. King 12/2/87
�i
DAKOTA
COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
2496 - 145th STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
612-423-4800
Serving People and Communities
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City
Managers; Tom Novak, County Administrator; and Dakota
County Planning Department
FROM: Mark S. Ulfers, Executive Director
SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DATE: December 4, 1987
Enclosed is the November Status Report for all Assisted Housing
Programs and Community Development Programs currently being
operated in your community and a summary sheet for Dakota County.
If you would like to also receive reports on other Dakota County
communities, please call Lori Zierden of our staff.
Enclosures
167
"AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER"
Status Repoft for Dakota County**
November, 1987
ASSISTED HOUSING
Section 8 Existing:
Certificates
Vouchers
Moderate Rehab
Section 8 New Construction
Low Rent Housing
235 Home
236 Rental
Amount
of
Elderl,,- Famil,„r Total + -
392
1,160
1,552
+2
37
163
200
+4
4
21
25
0
247
300
547
0
380
182
562
0
0
41
41
0
0
526
526
0
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,060 2,393 3,453 +6
Amount
Commercial/ of
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly,, Family Multifamily Total Increase
MHFA Local Participation
MHFA Home Improvement Loan
MHFA Home Rehab Loan
MHFA Home Energy Loan
Rental Rehab
CDBG Rehab Loan
CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home
MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan
312 Loan - Residential
312 Loan - Commercial/
Mixed Use
Weatherization
0
1
0
1 0
33
153
0
186 1
63
76
0
139 0
10
92
0
102 6
38
49
5
92 0
87
159
0
246 0
1
20
0
21 0
0
8
0
8 0
4
15
0
19 0
N/A N/A
334 1,355
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 570 1,921
* + = Increase/- = Decrease
3 3 0
0 1,689 15
8 2,499 22
** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in
Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are
excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs;
South St. Paul operates separate Community Development
programs.
140
Status Report for' the City of Eagan
November, 1987
ASSISTED HOUSING
Section 8 Existing:
Certificates
Vouchers
Section 8 New Construction
Low Rent Housing
236 Rental
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING
Amount
of
Elderly, Famil%, Total + -
40
230
270
+8
20
57
77
-2
0
33
33
0
0
17
17
0
0
144
144
0
60
481
541
+6
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderi
MHFA
Home
Improvement Loan
2
MHFA
Home
Rehab Loan
3
MHFA
Home
Energy Loan
1
CDBG
Rehab
Loan
1
Weatherization
0
5
5
TOTAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
12
* + = Increase/- = Decrease
141
Amount
of
F=^rn l y
Total
Increase
10
12
0
3
6
0
7
8
0
4
5
0
62
67
0
86
98
0
4 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - NOVEMBER 1987
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
Electrical 110 1,734
Plumbing 85 1,067
HVAC 88 1,281
Water Softener 10 180
Signs 26 146
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 0 15
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
YTD
MONTHLY
TYPE
i NO.
VALUATION
PERMIT FEE LAN REV FEE
TOTAL FEES
23
FOUNDATION
I 3
I 45.00
$ 45.00
648
SINGLE FAMILY
45
1$ 4,547,000
22,547.50 ,$ 11,273.75
112,505.75
46
DUPLEX
0
92
TOWNHOUSE
4
I 244,000
I 1,468.00
I 734.00
9_,133.00
3
CONDO
F XYl tSLll(i�
0 1 AGRI CULTURAL
32 I1COMMERCIAL
105 COMM/IND REMODEL
7 COMM/IND ADDITION
2 INDUSTRIAL
0 INSTITUTIONAL
6 PUBLIC FACILITIES
52 RES. GARAGES
37 RES. ADDITIONS
17 SWIM POOL
289 MISCELLANEOUS
3
DEMOLISH
2
HOUSE MOVES
1,375
MO. TOTALS
—3 ADJUSTMENTS
1,372 V"ftn TA Tftm?
I
3 I 843,000 ' 3,105.70 •1,552.85 18,022.05
9 I 296,875 1,905.60 i 773.50 i 2,828.10
1 h
14z -
250.00
1,815.00
81.75 347.75
856.25
14,511.60 I 145,552.90
291,059.80 13,642,580.33
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT
DATE NOVEMBER 1987
MULTI -FAMILY BREAKDOWN
TYPE
I
MO.MO.
# OF MO. # OF YTD # OF
PERMITS BUILDINGS BUILDINGS
# OF
UNITS
YTD.
# OF
UNITS
# OF
PERMITS
VOIDED
OF
UNITS
MOVED I
DUPLEX 23
3 -PLEB
46
.) 4-PLE% 4 1 20
I'
80
5-PLE% 1
5
6 -PLEB 2
12
4 7 -PIS
L ,
@ 8-PLE%
�10-PLEX
12-PLEX
!
16-PLEX 3
48 �
i
!i
APT. BLDG..; 11
I
! 232
OTHER
I
TOTAL: -I
60 �
'
423 +
j
i
1
/63
6
0
w
rx+
CIO
Z
O
U
Tr
0
U
7'
EE�H
O
U
0
U
0
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
H
O
U
H
O
U
H
O
U
0
O
N
N
Vl
N
N
O
O
N
Lr)
O
O
O
.O
O
N
ri
i*r
�
CO
^
CO
O
�O
%0
It
00
d
M
n
Ln
- O+
N
t,
'T
�O
1p
^
n
c1
Lt).�
N
u'
N
M
M
cn cn
M
N
z z
�
o
wa cHn a
W
za
¢ z
"
a o
^
p
o > a
a
co
M
N
�T
�O
0
�O
�
N
A
H
w
E-4
�"
F
a Ma
ti
.a
H
isr
H
x
fes; N n OO n 1` On r I
H
o
0
o
0
0
0
Ln
00
O
O
C7
N
0
0
0
0
Lno
H
7
co
00
-O
N
MO
.t
cn
M O
H
N
ri
N
^
[s7
M
�7
M
eel
.t
M
--r
w
a
M
M
cn cn
a
z z
�
o
wa cHn a
W
za
¢ z
"
a o
^
p
o > a
a
co
M
N
�T
�O
O�
�O
�
N
A
H
w
E-4
�"
H
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
O
O
O
C7
N
0
0
0
0
M
�
O
n
'i
N M
H
co
< �
¢
%D
0
co
^
[s7
M
�7
M
eel
.t
M
--r
w
a
M
M
cn cn
a
z z
.¢
o
wa cHn a
W
za
¢ z
"
a o
^
.a
o > a
a
co
M
N
�T
�O
O�
�O
�
N
A
H
w
E-4
�"
H
o
O
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
C7
N
0
0
0
0
H
o z
w
C
co
< �
¢
0
0
0
0
0
�T
M
� �
-T
-T
°�
w
a
M
M
cn cn
a
z z
.¢
o
wa cHn a
o
za
¢ z
"
a o
^
.a
o > a
d
co
M
N
�T
�O
O�
�O
N
o
o
L
Ln p
o �
N
• O
N
C7
N
Ln
z
H
0 0
0 0en
o �
N
4
N
P
o �
o
7
N
C7
N
M
P
N
z
o z
z o
co
< �
¢
o
z
a
w ❑ �
N
Nr
�T
M
� �
-T
-T
°�
w
a
M
M
cn cn
a
z z
.¢
o
wa cHn a
o
za
¢ z
"
a o
a
.a
o > a
E-4
z
o
a
� z w
a
A
H
w
E-4
�"
F
a Ma
ti
.a
❑ Q
H
x
w
z
aez
cw N
E
N
�+
F❑❑
❑
C4 Z
U
O
F
Lo z z
U N N
U
W H
O
❑
❑
cn 3
W x
aG
W 0
W ►] Z
f74
H>
W Z
H
P4 pC ❑ O
F L] ❑
¢
z❑
a04
a
UaQ=
a
<X
r� N
U ❑¢x
❑¢
¢Um. -r
❑
HFoo
U
w
-4
Urz ❑c4
C� C]❑
O¢w
¢M
aW
>UOti
z
W f7. E-4 Cl
,W1<
F
Q<a
H6OzqFUOU00
=a
.y w
cod
3
to a>-4 U
.a¢ww
o
k..x
w ¢ wa
W
❑
C14
Ua
x 0 � ai U rxw
O cn
4.F
U
zw
0¢^-
W
aw
Ua
4
cF z4
H
HPQ
co z 0 Cl
z F Cl
O ..r ^"
D ❑.-
H
Z-4U)rn
U.-+
3 M>4
U�
w ^
a
O o ^O Ori
UNU-4 F
q O CQ
PQ
O
M N
M u'i
PQ
cn
CC
Ln O
CQ
W
^❑M
CO CQ -4 CQ
O ^
N
O� n ^
^
p O� ^
.�
N ^
O
0` ^
O O % O
W ^ O� ^ co ^ ,n
N H
tea.-�a�ar•,a�aN.aHaNaNa
M .--�
M -4 to
Vl �--�
ON �-+ r� r-+ .-i ,-r
D` H
M N M H N N M N
-aMa-4
MM,
N
M
co
--
Ln
Ln
0
M
N
Nr
�T
M
M
-T
-T
Cn r�
-T -t M
M
M
M
C�
M
.t O�
M
�T
�T
-T
NT
-T
.T �t �T
�7
iv
7
PROTECTIVE
INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT NOVEMBER 1986
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED
THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
2
Building
80 1 505
- ,
Electrical
122 1 676
Plumbing
70 9q&
RVAC
837
7.
water Softener
1
7- ' -
Sin
Signs
t 7
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
0
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
YTD
7TPE
NO.
MONTHLY
VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE
TOTIL FEES -
t
16 FOUNDATION
FOUNDATION
4
$
Vie, Z-
-
867 SINGLE FAMILY
SINGLE FAMILY
48
3,819,000
3,8 19'000
.60.00
17,734.00
8,867.00
60.00
104,566.50
32
DUPLEX
DUPLEX
2
--- ---
1 24,010
638.00
319.00
4,188.00
21
TOWNHOUSE
4
245,000
1,267.00
633.56
8,361.00
10 CONDO
0
APT BLDGS
0
0 AGRICULTURAL
0
2 COMMERCIAL
-
2
1,298,000
3,611.00
1,805.5
29,677.50
� 677 50
COMM/IND REMODEL
10
253,050
1,541.50
657.7
2,327.25
2,327.25
COMM/IND ADDITION
1
10,000
80.50
85.30
C INDUSTRIAL
C INSTITUTIONAL
0
PUBLIC FACILITIES
0
31 RES. GARAGES
0
21 RES. ADDITIONS
111S* ADDITIONS
2
17,065
149.00
49.25
207.25
21 SWIM POOL
POOL
0
154 MISCELLANEOUS
7
72,225
557-50.
160.75
7 54.75
11 -;:-J
DEMOLISH
0
2 HOUSE MOVES
0
...... ........ 1
1,50TO
5 TALS
80
5,838,340
25,638.50
12,492.75
186,227.75
YEAR-TO-DATE
146,021,196
577,254.00
281,430.7
3,74 1,708.2o
f7
iv
7
- _ .. ...-.. � - _�.. =yam ._ .. � - - �c�
/� 1a �3_ 1S. /�.i.�Jtr `r ^'_�....... ��f r a_..�_.., ._.�. _._r- _ �_ .. �_ i' .-... � ... __., '';. c- . .. _ .__ _ _ ..._. _ _ _. ..�(��_ _ _ _ ... .�. .
_ _. _ lea. (:Oi -.=.f: M1:f .' _ =.4+ 'l:1 _� � �Si' _ i-
.. - - �.. - .. :r:
DAKOTA COUNTY JEFFREDIREcONNELL
O
December 1, 1987
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & PROGRAM MANAGEMENT (612) 431-1158
7300 WEST 147th STREET. SUITE 4503 APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124
Jon Hohenstein
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Jon:
I am writing to you at the request of Lyle Wray, in order to update you on the
County's siting efforts for its resource recovery facility.
Currently, the County's consultant is conducting a screening of sites in the
County, based upon first-round criteria. These criteria include accessibility
to major thoroughfares, proximity to the generation of waste in the County,
land use compatibility, avoidance of environmentally -sensitive areas (e.g.
floodplains), and potential availability of viable energy markets.
The current schedule now is to identify alternative sites within the County by
December 11, in a preliminary staff report. At that point, we anticipate
having discussions with city staffs regarding the alternative sites, prior to
holding public meetings on the alternative sites. It is hoped that a final
site(s) can be approved by the County Board in the middle of January.
In order for the three vendors, with whom the County is negotiating for the
resource recovery project, to submit a meaningful and complete final bid, it
is important that a final site.(s) -be i-dentified 6 -10 -weeks prior to submittal -
of the final bid. Therefore, it is anticipated final bids will be received
about March 31, 1988.
I hope this provides you with an understanding where the County is in its site
selection process, and our anticipated schedule. We will continue to keep you
informed as additional information becomes available through our consultant's
study.
Sincerely,
Jeff ey J. Connell, Director
PLANNING AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
JJC/jmn
cc: Lyle Wray, County Administrator
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
police department
4 November, 1987
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: PAT GEAGAN, CAPTAIN
SUBJECT: EAGAN AIR QUALITY ISSUE
The past several months the City of Eagan has experienced
an air -pollution problem on .3 occasions. The last incident
was on Sunday, November 1, 1987. On that date, the Eagan
Police Department received approximately 60 calls starting
at 12:15 P.M. and continuing throughout the early afternoon.
The callers were complaining about a strong, unpleasant
odor in the air, mainly in the area of Cliff Road from Hwy.
3 to Johnny Cake Road.
On at least 2 of the occasions that this odor occurred,
Koch Refinery in Rosemount was found to be the source. The
source of the odor on November lst is currently unknown,
but again, Koch Refinery is highly suspect.
I have had meetings with the Director of Dakota County
Civil Defense, Dave Gisch, as well as people from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding this problem.
Dave Gisch has had additional discussions with officials
from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. They indicated
to him that their agency is too busy to actively respond to
complaints regarding air -pollution being emitted from the
Koch Refinery. They also indicated that, as of this time,
Koch Refinery sends samples to them from the monitoring
systems the M.P.C.A. has placed around the refinery for
analysis.
Dave Gisch advised me that the Dakota County Environmental
Health staff is concerned about the situation at the Koch
Refinery, but it is difficult for them to intervene, as the
monitoring at the refinery belongs to the M.P.C.A. and they
have not asked Dakota County for assistance. It is my
understanding that although Dakota County is willing to
assist with this problem, they feel the M.P.C.A. should
monitor the situation more closely, particularly because it
is their equipment doing themonitoring.
�//
(D 7
THE LONE OAK TREE. .THE SYMBOL OF SfRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
JAY M. BERTHE
Chief of Police
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
Administrative Captain
f
KENNETH .ASZMANN
o cragan
Operationns Cep Win
4 November, 1987
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: PAT GEAGAN, CAPTAIN
SUBJECT: EAGAN AIR QUALITY ISSUE
The past several months the City of Eagan has experienced
an air -pollution problem on .3 occasions. The last incident
was on Sunday, November 1, 1987. On that date, the Eagan
Police Department received approximately 60 calls starting
at 12:15 P.M. and continuing throughout the early afternoon.
The callers were complaining about a strong, unpleasant
odor in the air, mainly in the area of Cliff Road from Hwy.
3 to Johnny Cake Road.
On at least 2 of the occasions that this odor occurred,
Koch Refinery in Rosemount was found to be the source. The
source of the odor on November lst is currently unknown,
but again, Koch Refinery is highly suspect.
I have had meetings with the Director of Dakota County
Civil Defense, Dave Gisch, as well as people from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding this problem.
Dave Gisch has had additional discussions with officials
from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. They indicated
to him that their agency is too busy to actively respond to
complaints regarding air -pollution being emitted from the
Koch Refinery. They also indicated that, as of this time,
Koch Refinery sends samples to them from the monitoring
systems the M.P.C.A. has placed around the refinery for
analysis.
Dave Gisch advised me that the Dakota County Environmental
Health staff is concerned about the situation at the Koch
Refinery, but it is difficult for them to intervene, as the
monitoring at the refinery belongs to the M.P.C.A. and they
have not asked Dakota County for assistance. It is my
understanding that although Dakota County is willing to
assist with this problem, they feel the M.P.C.A. should
monitor the situation more closely, particularly because it
is their equipment doing themonitoring.
�//
(D 7
THE LONE OAK TREE. .THE SYMBOL OF SfRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Page 2
EAGAN AIR QUALITY ISSUE
I am extremely concerned about the frequency of the
air -pollution problems, as well as the fact that Koch
Refinery is in almost a constant state of expansion. It
would seem that with this expansion, the community can
expect to have further air quality problems, with the added
difficulty that M.P.C.A. appears reluctant to intervene.
If you feel it is an order, we would like to see an
official position taken, by the city, regarding the air
quality issue and a letter to the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, as well as the Dakota County Commissioners,
requesting assistance in solving the air quality issues and
determining the levels of toxicity that could effect the
community.
Pat Geagan
Captain
PJG/lb
DAKOTA COUNTY (6,•).=0-x,1
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION 33 EAST WENTWORTH, WEST ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55118
•� REPLY TO:
y k -w -+-• 0 Human Services Director. (612) 450-2742
a 1 D Planning (612) 450-2742
• DEmployment 8 Economic Assistance.
}:i �' ✓- (612) 450-2611
a - J"ublic Health. (612) 450-2614
0 Social Services. (612) 450-2677
0 Veteran's Services. (612) 450-2601
33 East Wentworth
West Sl. Paul. MN 55118
November 19, 1987
Michael Valentine, Director
Air Pollution Control Division
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
1935 West County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
Richard Svanda, Director
Hazardous Waste Management Division
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
1935 West County Rd B2
Roseville, MN 55113
Dear Mr. Valentine and Mr. Svanda:
0 Public Health (Nursing Service) 0 Social Services
1101 West County Road 42 900 West 128th Street
Burnsville. MN 55337 Burnsville, MN 55337
(612) 435-8055 (6121 895.3577
Over the past several months, Dakota County residents have made
numerous complaints to local police departments and to Dakota County
agencies (Sheriff and Public Health) about a pungent odor in the
atmosphere. There have been eight separate incidents in the past 12
weeks, and an estimated 218 telephone calls received are described in
the enclosed chart. Many residents reported eye irritation,
headaches, nausea and congestion as a result of these airborne
emissions. Reportedly, several persons with chronic respiratory
diseases suffered severe reactions requiring medical attention and one
possible hospitalization.
With each separate incident, Dakota County Public Safety and
Public Health (Environmental Health) staff, along with local
officials, followed appropriate procedures for notification and
requests for assistance from the State of Minnesota. The current
procedure is to notify the State Duty Officer at the Division of
Emergency Management (DEM) of any incident involving chemical
releases. The State Duty Officer then calls the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPGA) for assistance and, if appropriate, to authorize
dispatching of the Hazardous Material Vehicle. On September 15, 1987,
the Eagan Police Department requested the vehicle to assist with the
identification of airborne emissions. The response of the vehicle was
not in a timely fashion. (It arrived 2 1/2 hours after the request).
/K
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
X"
We are concerned that MPCA either does not have a timely response
or failed to respond to our requests for assistance. Specifically:
1. No immediate site visits were made to investigate the
reported complaints.
2. No telemetry data from several monitoring stations in
Dakota County was evaluated in a timely fashion.
3. No immediate requests were made for available air quality
reports from industries in the area.
4. The potential public health and safety risks of airborne
sulfurous/hydrocarbon plumes have been minimized as the
incidents have been regarded as nuisance odors only.
We need appropriate and effective response procedures for these
kinds of situations to protect the health and safety of Dakota County
residents. Practical and workable procedures need to be developed for
implementation by state, county, and local officials.
Because these incidents represent potential serious health
hazards, we request your immediate attention to develop satisfactory
response procedures. A high priority is to modify the Pine Bend Area
Notification Plan to include additional airborne emissions and to
develop more specific notification procedures for refinery
malfunctions or breakdowns.
We would like to meet with you and appropriate MPCA staff at the
end of November or early December to further discuss the issues of
emergency response and to sort out our respective roles and
responsibilities. I will be calling you early next week to arrange a
mutually convenient meeting time. Your cooperation is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Donna M. -Anderson
Public Health Director
Enclosure
cc: Lyle Wray, County Administrator
Howard Strabala, Division Emergency Management
Department of Public Safety
Rod Boyd, Sheriff, Dakota County
Pat Geagan, Captain, Eagan Police Department
Ray Thron, Minnesota Department of Health
DMA/mt
/,0
J-
W
W
W�
Wa
a
a
a
U
H
w
x
U
O
a
W
W
O
H
U?
N
H
w
a
H
4
Ea
E-1
z
w
A
H
:�, O U
�i
A E-+
W O
�: FC
a A
a
a
U
'C
ro
O
N
41
O
�4
w
O
O
N
W
GAJ
Ln
O
u9
m
O
to
O
O
r -i
N
G
N
1O
�
C
G
W
E•
H
H
N
W
W
E4
x
H
W
x
W
O
W
E
ia]
O
E-1
zz
U
3
O
3
3
Z
O
2
a
O
Z
a
Q
W
2
W
E
E
4
X
z
a
4
a
z
o
a
a
P
O
CO
CO
co
co
a)
P
co
P
co
U1
ON
ON
O1
01
0%
OD
M
co
0%
r i
.i
r -I
.-i
H
rn
r 4
O%
�
r -I
E
a
in
in
in
%D
o
r-
P
in
r-1
H
r-1
r -i
H
N
N
co
ri
ri
awa
owa
wW
owo
owgo
x
a
w
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
¢1
m
E
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
°z
491-71
i<
1
Subject to -Approval
MINUTES OF THE AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING
Eagan, Minnesota
November 10, 1987
A regular meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Committee Meeting
was held on Tuesday, November 10, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. Present were Chairman
John Gustin, Dustin Mirick,,Carol Dozois, Tom Baker and Carolyn Braun. Absent
was Joe Harrison. Also present was Jon Hohenstein, Administrative Assistant.
INTRODUCTION
Chairman Gustin introduced the Committee to the audience consisting
of a number of McKee Addition residents present to discuss aircraft noise in
their neighborhood. He stated that the Committee was an advisory body to the
City Council in the area of airport related issues. He stated that the
Committee is not directly related to the Metropolitan Airports Commission.
MINUTES
Upon motion by Baker, seconded by Mirick, all members voting in
favor, the minutes of the September 8, 1987 Airport Relations Committee
meeting were approved.
AGENDA
Upon review and by acclamation the agenda was approved.
MC KEE ADDITION NOISE CONCERNS
Chairman Gustin invited comments from the audience and indicated
that the Committee would attempt to answer questions raised by the neighbors
and would forward their comments to the City Council for its consideration.
Debbe Garvey indicated that she and her neighbors do not want to
sell their homes but also would avoid additional investments in the property
if it is going to be bought out.
Ted Plante stated that he has noticed a sizable increase in traffic
since deregulation but does not feel that bandaid approaches such as sound
insulation or quiet rooms make sense. He stated that if the City could not
change the noise generator that a total buy out of the neighborhood is more
reasonable than bandaid approaches but not much more reasonable. Certain
neighborhood residents asked how a buy out would be structured because they
understood that the Mendota Heights/Acosta Park buy out that involved
condemnation and the purchase of homes at discount prices. The Committee
responded that no program is currently in place so the details of how one
would be structured are not available.
17Z--
MI
Rose Buntjer raised questions concerning the corridor and flight
tracks within it. Hohenstein described the f light tracks used in the corridor
before deregulation and those currently used as a result of higher traffic
levels and safety separations. He stated that the unfortunate consequence of
the McKee Addition lying within the commercial/industrial area was that
traffic using the corridor for sound absorption also impacted a noise
sensitive area. Ted Plante asked how the area had become
commercial/industrial since zoning maps still show it as residential property.
Hohenstein explained that the Comprehensive Guide process has designated the
area commercial/ industrial in a long term sense. He said that means that it
makes the most sense, given surrounding land uses that the area ultimately be
commercial, but that does not mean that there are any implementation plans to
bring that about.
Plante asked if there was any discussion of a second airport.
Mirick responded by describing a proposal prepared by John Richter, a South
Minneapolis activist. He said that under the Richter proposal, the University
of Minnesota site in Rosemount would be purchased along with residential
development rights in several directions and that a large new airport could be
built there. Plante asked if such a site wouldn't affect southern Eagan.
Mirick responded that the configuration described in the proposal would not
but that it would be possible to route traffic in such a fashion to impact
all communities surrounding the Rosemount site. Hohenstein pointed out that
the proposal is merely a discussion concept raised by South Minneapolis
residents and that it did not have endorsement of any official planning or
decision making bodies.
Mirick also described the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement
Council and how it maintains information on complaints lodged from various
areas around the airport. He indicated that South Minneapolis does not
believe that northern Dakota County has a noise problem due to complaint
levels. He said that while operational considerations prevent a change in the
location of impacts, telephone and written complaints will certainly indicate
the severity of the problem. Chair Gustin also indicated that if individuals
are bothered they should use the noise complaint numbers. Hohenstein provided
the numbers to the group.
Hohenstein stated that the greatest benefit would come from the
introduction of stage three aircraft into the airline fleets. He stated that
this would occur naturally over the next 15 years and could only be
accelerated through some federal action. Steve Rosenthal asked if it would
help to write to the congressional delegation. The Committee indicated that
that would help and that it would reinforce correspondence which the Committee
has been forwarding to those individuals.
Residents asked how they could be kept informed of Airport Relations
Committee and other airport related meetings. Staff offered to place them on
the mailing list for the local committee and inform them of the standard dates
for regional group meetings.
Buntjer asked what the Committee would be able to take to the
Council. Gustin responded that it would report the facts presented at the
meeting to the extent possible and ask direction of the City Council. Upon
motion by Baker, seconded by Braun, all members voting in favor, staff was
directed to prepare a memo to the City Council for consideration as an
informative item on its November 17 agenda which would indicate the level of
concern coming from the McKee Addition, recommend correspondence to the
Metropolitan Airports Commission reiterating the need for left turn procedures
173
during off-peak traffic, indicate that the neighborhood is concerned about the
noise situation but is generally not interested in buy outs or condemnation
and requests Council action.
Upon conclusion of the motion, Chair Gustin invited interested
residents to apply to the City for consideration as members of the Airport
Relations Committee. Mirick stated that the residents who were present were
obviously those most interested in the issue and that they should consider
getting together to discuss their options. Chair Gustin stated that if the
neighborhood wished to have a meeting, City facilities and staff or Airport
Relations Committee members could be present to provide information and
support.
OTHER BUSINESS
All other business was continued to a future agenda for
consideration.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 8, 1987.
ADJOURNMENT
Upon motion by Mirick, seconded by Gustin, all members voting in
favor, the meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m.
Date
174
Chairperson
Secretary
JH
ACTION SUMMARY
EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMITTEE
DECEMBER 8? 1987
I. ROLL CALL AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approved as amended.
II. ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Adopted
III. STAFF REPORT
A. City Council Action McKee Addition Noise Issue
Received with questions from Mckee residents.
B. Chamber of Commerce - Airport Adequacy
Position
Received without comment.
IV. OLD BUSINESS
A. MAC Eagan - Mendota Heights Corridor Study
Acted to recommend Council action to support
study alternative #3 which provides for a 5
degree left turn at the middle marker as a
standard southern boundary for corridor
operations.
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. Potential Preferential Runway System
Modification
Acted to direct staff to correspond with the
MAC requesting that any modification of
runway configurations maintain the integrity
of the corridor and not be tied to a runway
4/22 extension.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
VII. DISTRIBUTION
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
/ 7$
IN REPLY REFER TO:
?AIMj
P' DEINs
United States Department of the Interior uma®••�
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICEmom
■
Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge
4101 East 80th Street
Bloomington, 211N 55420
November 13, 1987
Mr. Thomas Hedges
City Administrator
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road, Box 21199
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Dear Mr. Hedges:
In response to a growing deer population problem in the metropolitan Minnesota
River valley, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in cooperation with the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, has been working on the development
of a long-term deer herd control plan for the area.
A pilot deer reduction program utilizing public hunting and professional
sharpshooters has been implemented in the Ft. Snelling State Park/Long Meadow
Lake/Blackdog Lake area for the past three years. The program has had an
excellent safety record and has been moderately successful in keeping
population numbers in check in this area.
Because of the experimental nature of the program, many different approaches
and methods have been used in the deer reduction program. Periodic review of
these methods is important if they are to be applied in the formulation of a
safe and effective long-term deer control program for the metropolitan
Minnesota River valley deer population.
A report evaluating the effectiveness of our 1986 deer reduction program has
recently been completed and is enclosed for your information. I feel this
information will help you in making well-informed decisions about the future
application of these deer herd reduction methods in the long-term deer control
program.
Please feel free to contact me with your comments or questions at 854-5900.
Enclosure
Sincerely yours,
i
Edward S. Crozier
Refuge Manager
176
-1-
INTRODUCTION
Since 1982, the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge has been monitoring
a rapidly increasing deer population in the Minnesota River floodplain and
surrounding communities. Deer populations are reaching such high numbers that
severe browse damage to vegetation and increasing deer/car collision incidents
are resulting. Therefore, in 1984, the refuge along with the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources initiated a deer reduction program to curb
herd growth. This effort began with a public hunt which has been expanded
over the past three years and was supplemented with sharpshooting operations
in 1986. In 1987, the deer herd reduction program will call for a 25%
reduction in the post -hunt deer population targeting 283 deer for removal.
METHODS
Two deer removal operations were conducted, a public hunt in November and
sharpshooting in late winter. Both operations were conducted jointly by the
Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge and the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources.
Metro Deer Hunt
Both archery and shotgun hunting permits were issued and hunting was allowed
in designated areas of Fort Snelling State Park and the Blackdog Lake and Long
Meadow Lake Units of the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge (See
Map A). The metro deer hunt was held on November 8 & 9 and 15 & 16. Deer of
either sex could be taken and a second permit for taking antlerless deer was
offered.
Sharpshooting Operation
Sharpshooting was conducted from January through mid -march by state and
federal law enforcement officials. Priority was given to the taking of female
deer. Deer were taken using three methods: nightlighting from an automobile,
night shooting over bait and daylight drives. Deer hides were removed and
collected by the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association and the meat was sold to
charitable organizations.
RESULTS
A total of 225 deer were taken during the winter of 1986, 100 during the
public hunt and 125 with supplemental sharpshooting. The sex/age breakdown of
the deer taken are given in Table 1.
AGE
SEX Adult Fawn Total
Male 53 46 99
Female 78 48 126
Total 131 94 225
TABLE 1. Age/Sex Breakdown of Deer Taken in 1986.
1-77
J�
SUMMARY
I-494 is one of the oldest interstate highways in the Twin
Cities Metropolitan Area. The segment between CSAH 18 and
the airport was opened in 1960-61 and "is well beyond its
twenty-year design life. Peak period traffic congestion is
a common occurrence. The highway currently has a substan-
tial amount of deteriorating pavement which will require
extensive maintenance or replacement in the near future. In
many areas design features such as narrow shoulders do not
comply with current design standards.
The Metropolitan Council's Transportation Policy Plan
recognizes the need to increase the traffic carrying capa-
city west of TH 100 to TH 169 in Eden Prairie where back-ups
currently occur during peak hours. It also identifies the
need to upgrade interchanges at TH 77 (Cedar Avenue) and
24th Avenue.
In addition to today's need for improvements on I-494,
current and future development proposals in the corridor are
expected to significantly increase the travel demand on the
facility. Two existing proposals, the Fashion Mall of
America and Fantasyworld in the Airport South District and
Homart's Minnesota Center, are representative of the higher
intensity development which is expected in the corridor in
the future. Other areas are also expected to be redeveloped
at higher densities.
Although the need to improve I-494 is evident today and will
become more pressing in the next decade, the Minnesota
Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has not yet scheduled
any major upgrading for I-494. This is because Mn/DOT does
not have sufficient funding to meet the tremendous demands
of maintaining the metropolitan and state highway system
already in place, upgrading the existing system, and
building new facilities.
Because of identified need, the expectation of further
growth and severe funding limitations, the Metropolitan
Significance Review of both the Fashion Mall of America and
the Homart proposals emphasized the need for a planning
study in the I-494 corridor. -In 1986, the Metropolitan
Council initiated this study in cooperation with Mn/DOT, the
� 7�
Regional Transit Board, the Metropolitan Airports
Commission, Hennepin County, and the Cities of Richfield,
Bloomington, Edina, Eden Prairie, and Minnetonka. The
objectives of this study are:
o To produce a design concept for the metropolitan
transportation facilities in the corridor.
o To identify transit and travel demand management strate-
gies for the corridor.
o To identify development levels and land use types com-
patible with the proposed transportation infrastructure.
o To recommend a strategy, including timetable and funding
mechanisms, for implementation of the proposed transpor-
tation improvements.
The intent of this study is to provide a planning framework
for further work in the corridor. It is not intended to
replace environmental review, preliminary geometric design,
detailed final design, or transit service design and sche-
dule plans which will be required prior to implementing the
study recommendations.
The study area is divided into two subareas. The primary
study area runs from CSAH 62 on the west to TH 5 on the
east. The secondary study area runs from CSAH 62 to I-394
and from TH 5 to I -35E (Figure S1).
SOCIO-ECONOMIC FORECASTS
The Metropolitan Council is the agency responsible for popu-
lation and employment forecasts for the entire region. The
intensity of recent commercial development proposals along
I-494 has caused some local concern over whether the
Metropolitan Council's employment forecasts are understated
in this corridor. Consequently, for the purposes of the
I-494 Corridor Study, each of the municipalities supplied a
forecast of 2010 land use, which was then translated into
population and employment forecasts. Figure S2 compares the
2010 forecasts made by the Metropolitan Council and the
cities, and shows the relationship of these forecasts with
the 1980 census information. The information is summarized
below.
liq
MEMO TO: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: JOE CONNOLLY, SUPERINTENDENT OF UTILITIES/BUILDINGS
DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1987
SUBJECT: ELECTRIC COSTS FOR UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
Tom, as you recall, in late 1986 the Utilities Department requested Triangle
Engineering Inc. to put together an energy efficiency study for us. As a
result of this study, a program to conserve electricity was written. One part
of this program was the "Time of Day" electric rate, which really means no
pumping between 5:00 PM and 11:00 PM at night.
This program was put into our operations in March of 1987. The Lexington
Booster Station cut over to the "Time of Day" rate on March 13, 1987. Table I
shows the savings at this Booster Station.
TABLE I
Well House #4 and our Water Treatment Plant, which are on the same electric
service, were cut over to the "Time of Day" rate on March 26, 1987. Table II
shows the savings at this service location.
Old Rate
3-26-87 $ 11,756.41
4-27-87
Old Rate
New Rate
3-13-87
$ 115.76
$ 119.79
4-16-87
714.99
417.39
5-19-87
2,084.36
1,780.88
6-16-87
1,474.18
1,234.77
7-16-87
2,124.62
1,711.24
8-14-87
1,513.49
995.16
9-17-87
2,043.16
1,454.12
TOTAL
$10,070.56
$7,713.35
Showing a savings of
$ 2,357.21
Well House #4 and our Water Treatment Plant, which are on the same electric
service, were cut over to the "Time of Day" rate on March 26, 1987. Table II
shows the savings at this service location.
Old Rate
3-26-87 $ 11,756.41
4-27-87
17,273.38
5-27-87
18,331.88
6-25-87
18,648.91
7-27-87
19,856.43
8-25-87
17,513.92
9-25-87
17,101.85
TOTAL
$120,482.78
Showing a savings of
TABLE II
New Rate
$ 6,696.34
13,859.21
14,205.09
16,008.66
15,283.16
12,548.20
12,438.50
$78,569.16
$41,913.62
THOMAS A. COLBERT
PAGE 2.
DECEMBER 8, 1987
Well House #1 was out over on May 27, 1987.
this pumping station.
TABLE III
Old Rate
5-27-87 $ 3,331.21
6-25-87
3,352.55
7-27-87
3,655.99
8-25-87
3,512.09
9-25-87
3,457.80
TOTAL
$17,309.64
Showing a savings of
The combined savings from these three tables:
Table III shows the savings at
TABLE I $ 2,357.21
TABLE II $41,913.62
TABLE III $ 3,750.05
New Rate
$ 2,511.00
2,423.46
2,643.86
3,200.45
2,780.82
$13,559.59
$ 3,750.05
TOTAL SAVINGS $48,020.88
EXPENSE FOR THE STUDY BY TRIANGLE ENGINEERING $14,000.00
TOTAL SAVINGS YEAR TO DATE $34,020.88
These figures are only for a 6 -month time period, and are right in line with
the projections of the study. If we project these figures to a full year, the
savings may well run to $70,000 a year.
Some minor problems did pop up with the "Time of Day" rate, although they were
nothing we could not overcome. I must commend Mr. Paul Heuer in overseeing
this program and working with Triangle Engineering to bring about such
outstanding results. Paul, along with Mr. Mike Chell - our operator in the
plant - did yeomen's duty in working out the little bugs in the program.
Goe Connolly 6
Superintendent of Utilities/Buildings
JC/nab
/8/