Loading...
10/20/1987 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL OCTOBER 20, 1987 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) A. POLICE DEPARTMENT I. Police Chaplain 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (ORCHID) IIV. A. `` LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS, Off -Sale Liquor, On -Sale Liquor, Wine, Off -Sale Beer, On -Sale Beer P. •7 B. 1 ON -SALE BEER LICENSE, Change in Corporate Officials, Pizza Hut, 3992 Sibley Memorial Highway .`� C. TRANSFER OF FUND ASSETS D. SALE, 1976 Ford L-8000 Tandem Dump Truck E. AUDITING SERVICES, Approval of Deloitte Haskins & Sells as 1 F. Auditors for Year Ending December 31, 1987 SENIOR CITIZEN DEFERMENT, Special Assessment Deferment for Martha Dehler for Project 469 AG. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, Fire Training Facilities ,�S H. FINAL PLAT, BBD 2nd Addition IkI I. PROJECT 523, Stoney Point & Blackhawk Ridge - Trunk Water Main V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) A. PROJECT 452R (Revised), Pond AP -50 Outlet (To be Continued to the B. November 5, 1987 Meeting) (� PROJECT 487R, Braun Court - Street (Cont'd from October 6) p,2 --C. PROJECT 449R, Country Club Market - Driveway/Landscaping p 2D• PROJECT 509, Patrick Addition - Streets & Utilities (Cont'd from 1 October 6) .-E. PROJECT 516, Gopher Eagan Ind Park 2nd Add - Streets & Utilities n F. (Cont'd from October 6) 2 l VACATION, Utility Easement, L1, Bl 4, Oak Cliff 1st Addition VI. OLD BUSINESS (PINK) A. ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY, Parcel 011-75, Borchert -Ingersoll VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) A. B, ACCESSORY HOUSING PERMIT, 1725 Deerwood Drive, Michael Kalzenberg P(O PRELIMINARY PLAT, Sienna Corporation, Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition C. REZONING, Robert Engstrom Companies, Engstroms Deerwood Addition and a PRELIMINARY PLAT entitled Engstrom's Deerwood Addition ,1 D. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Keller Investment Company, Dorchester of Eagan Addition 1 E. PRELIMINARY PLAT, M.G. Astleford Company, Inc., Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition �O-q. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Yorkton Ltd., Inc., Yorkton Industrial Park South 2nd Addition, j712'G. VARIANCE TO CITY CODE (Maximum Street Grade), Hidden Valley Add S H. SPECIAL PERMIT, Mark Miller, Eagandale Industrial Center P- I. VARIANCE, Carlos and Melody McKee, 3947 Beryl Rd., 2' Sideyard ch . Setback VARIANCE, Vivienne Jabaay, 10' Rear Yard Setback P' X31 K. FOUNDATION PERMIT, Gopher Eagan 2nd Addition, Consolidated Freightways L. REVISED SITE PLAN AND CONDITION, Cutters Ridge Addition VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) A. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS: 1. CONTRACT 87-32A, Consider Award of Contract, Country Club Market - Driveway (Cont'd from October 6) 2. CONTRACT 87-32B, Consider Award of Contract, Braun Court - Streets (Cont'd from October 6) 3 3. CONTRACT 87-32D, Consider Award of Contract, Patrick Addition - P, Streets and Utilities (Cont'd from October 6) 4. CONTRACT 87-40, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids Gopher Eagan � Industrial Park 2nd Addition - Streets & Utilities (Cont'd from October 6) 5. CONTRACT 87-37, Approve Change Order No. 1, Park Cliff 2nd Add 6. CONTRACT 87-38, Receive Bids/Award Contract, Dallas Development 2nd Addition 7. CONTRACT 87-41, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids, St. Francis Woods 6th Addition s 8. CONTRACT 87-30, Approve Change Order #1, Country Hollow IX. VISITORS TO BE HEARD ( for those persons not on the agenda) X. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) XI. ADJOURNMENT i MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: OCTOBER 14, 1987 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION APRROVE-MINUTES/ADOPT;'AGENDA, After approval is given to the October 20, 1987 agenda, and regular City Council meeting minutes for October 6, 1987, the following items are in order for consideration: -DEPARTMENT HEAD�BUSINESS4 A. POLICE DEPARTMENT: Item 1. Police Chap lain --Pastor James Bloch recently and successfully completed police chaplain training through the St. Paul Police Chaplain Academy. Pastor Bloch is senior pastor at Christ Lutheran Church and was the only suburban chaplain to complete the academy. On behalf of the City of Eagan, both Captain Geagan and City Administrator Hedges, along with their spouses, attended the graduation ceremony at the St. Paul Arts and Science building -on Friday evening October 9, 1987. For additional information on the police chaplain program, refer to a memo prepared by the Police Administration enclosed on pages * through * . Also enclosed is a copy of a letter of thanks to the St. Paul Police Department for allowing Pastor Bloch to attend their academy; this copy is enclosed on page �. Pastor Bloch will be present at the meeting to be introduced to the City Council and formally accepted as a volunteer police chaplain. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept Pastor James Bloch as the designated police chaplain for the Eagan Police Department recognizing that Pastor Bloch will serve without compensation. *SPECIAL NOTE: Due to a trial now going on at the Courthouse in Hastings, Captain Geagan's memo will be included with the Additional Information packet on Monday. Ot,V cF eac, an 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mavor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VAC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Memcers October 13, 1987 THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk LIEUT LARRY MCDONALD VOLUNTEER SERVICES UNIT ST PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT 100 E 11TH ST ST PAUL, MN 55101 Dear Lieut. McDonald: Your brief ceremony last Friday to honor the first St. Paul Police Chaplain Academy was most impressive. My sincere thanks to you and your department for allowing the City of Eagan to participate in the Chaplain Academy. We are honored to have Pastor Bloch as our first police chaplain and feel the training that was provided through your academy will be most beneficial to Pastor Bloch and our police department. The continued support and intergovernmental cooperation extended to our police department is most gratifying and appreciated. Thanks again. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/mc cc: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Chief of Police Jay Berthe Pastor James Bloch, Eagan Police Chaplain THE LONE OAK TREE. .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 C NSSN-7,, AGENDA] There are nine (9) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS A. Liquor License Renewals, Off -Sale Liquor, On -Sale Liquor, Wine, Off -Sale Beer and On -Sale Beer --There are 12 on -sale liquor license renewals, one on -sale club, five off -sale liquor license renewals, seven wine licenses, 16 on -sale beer and 16 off -sale beer that are in order for consideration. All the aforementioned licenses are renewals for 1988. Refer to pages- through for an itemized list of each establishment requesting a renewal. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the liquor license renewals as stated. October 20, 1987 1988 ON SALE LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS Name & Address License # Al Baker's 9 3434 Washington Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Cedarvale Bowl, Inc. 8 3883 Beau d'Rue Drive Eagan, MN 55122 (Compri) Hotel 13 2700 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN55121 Dougherty's 12 1312 Town Centre Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Durnings 3 4625 Nicols Road Eagan, MN 55122 Eagandale Club 6 3330 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Hong Wong Restaurant 11 2139 Cliff Road Eagan, MN 55122 La Fonda's 7 3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan, MN 55122 Mediterranean Cruise 10 3945 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan, MN 55122 Richard's Food & Liquor 2 4185 S. Robert Trail Eagan, MN 55123 Starks Saloon 4 3125 Dodd Road EAgan, MN 55121 Valley Lounge 5 3385 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan, MN 55122 October 20, 1987 Agenda 1988 OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS Name & Address License # Applebaum Companies, Inc. 1 dba Big Top Wines & Spirits 3900 Beau d'Rue Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Kenny's Enterprises, Inc. 2 dba Kennys Liquor 1444 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, MN 55122 Perrier & Associates 3 dba Cedarcliff Liquors 2141 Cliff Road Eagan, MN 55122 Sidco, Inc. 5 dba Big Top Wines & Spirits 1282 Town Centre Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Spirits of Eagan, Inc. 4 dba MGM Warehouse 4178 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 1988 ON SALE CLUB Spur, Inc. 1C dba Osman's Spur Country Club 2750 Sibley Memorial Hwy. Eagan, MN 55121 3 October 20, 1987 Agenda 1988 WINE LICENSE RENEWALS Name & Address License # Broadway Pizza 6 2113 Cliff Road Eagan, MN 55122 Carbone's Pizzeria 3 Fratelli Tre, Inc. 1665 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, MN 55122 Diamond T Ranch 1 Jerry Thomas 4889 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Hunan Garden 5 1304 Town Centre Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Italian Pie Shoppe 2 James Basta 1438 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, MN 55122 Rocky Rococco's 8 2130 Cliff Road Eagan, MN 55122 Vi Huong, Ltd. 7 Ngan Truong 1989 Silver Bell Center Eagan, MN 55122 �f October 20, 1987 Agenda 1988 ON SALE BEER LICENSE RENEWALS Name & Address Airliner Motel Pui Man Wong 2788 Highway 55 Eagan, MN 55121 License # 8 Broadway Pizza 6 John Odeen 2113 Cliff Road Eagan, MN 55122 Carbone's Pizzeria 4 Fratelli Tre, Inc. 1665 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, MN 55121 Carriage Hill Country Club 9 William H. Smith 3535 Wescott Hills Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Diamond T Ranch 1 Jerry Thomas 4889 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dragon Palace of Lee 10 Lee Fo Len 1466 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, MN 55122 Eagan Tap, Inc. 14 Chris Diebold 3998 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan, MN 55122 Hunan Garden 5 Maurice Fung 1304 Town Centre Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Italian Pie Shoppe 15 James Basta 1438 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, MN 55122 J� Name & Address Mr D's Pizza Peter Christensen 3902 Beau d'Rue Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Parkview Golf Club Donald Larsen 1310 Cliff Road Eagan, MN 55123 Piccolo's Pizzeria Greg Heuer 4162 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Pizza Hut Lon Fjelstad 3992 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan, MN 55122 Rocky Rococco's James L. Hardy 2130 Cliff Road Eagan, MN 55122 Vi Huong, Ltd. Ngan Troung 1989 Silver Bell Center Eagan, MN 55122 West End Hunting Club Donald Steimer RR 2 Hwy 3 Box 293 Rosemount, MN 55068 License # 7 3 11 23 12 17 2 October 20, 1987 Agenda 1988 OFF SALE BEER LICENSE RENEWALS Name' & Address Brooks Superette 3390 Coachman Road Eagan, MN 55122 Country Club Market 3820 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan, MN 55122 R.C. Dick's 3910 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan, MN 55122 PDQ Food of Minnesota 4160 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 PDQ Food of Minnesota 1969 Silver Bell Road Eagan, MN 55122 Q Petroleum 4206 Nicols Road Eagan, MN 55122 Rainbow Foods 1276 Town Centre Drive Eagan, MN 55123 Superamerica #4049 Hwy 13 & Co. Rd 30 Eagan, MN 55122 Superamerica #4182 1406 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, MN 55122 Superamerica #4335 1379 Town Centre Drive Eagan, MN 55122 License # Name & Address License —# 17 Texaco Fuel Stop 4 3150 Dodd Road Eagan, MN 55121 3 Tom Thumb 7 3904 Beau d'Rue Drive Eagan, MN 55122 10 Tom Thumb 11 1430 Yankee Doodle Rd Eagan, MN 55122 9 Tom Thumb 13 2125 Cliff Road Eagan, MN 55122 8 Tom Thumb 18 4130 Blackhawk Rd Eagan, MN 55122 12 Walgreen Drug 15 1278 Town Centre Drive Eagan, MN 55123 14 9 N a Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 ON -SALE BEER LICENSE/PIZZA HUT B. On -Sale Beer License, Change in Corporate Officials for Pizza Hut --An application was submitted by Pizza Hut requesting a change in corporate officials. The two corporate officials to be added are Michael Moline and Teresa J. Roll both of Wichita, Kansas which is the corporate office for Pizza Hut. Since Pizza Hut is a corporate restaurant referenced as Pizza Huts of the Northwest, Inc., any time there is a change in corporate officers, our ordinance requires an investigation and approval by the City Council. For a copy of the personal information on Michael Moline and Teresa Roll, refer to the enclosure without page numbers. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an on -sale beer license, change in corporate officials for Pizza Hut. TRANSFER OF FUND ASSETS C. Transfer of Fund Assets --The Director of Finance is requesting authorization to transfer assets of the 1981-1 Equipment Certificates Fund (#48) and the 1981-2 Equipment Certificates Fund (#49) to the 1983 Equipment Certificates Fund (#43). All debt service payments have been made from these two funds and it is appropriate that they be closed at this time. No debt service tax levy was certified for either 1987 or 1988 for the 1983 Equipment Certificates fund because of the availability of these balances. The total asset transfer amounts to $36,388.19. It has been the City Council's policy to close these funds to the next oldest similar fund which is therefore the action being proposed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the transfer of fund assets from the 1981-1 and 1981-2 Equipment Certificates fund to the 1983 Equipment Certificates fund as stated. . SALE/1976 DUMP TRUCK D. Sale of 1976 Ford L-8000 Tandem Dump Truck --As a part of the 1987 General Fund Budget, the purchase of a new tandem dump truck was approved for a replacement for the 1976 Ford L-8000 tandem dump truck. The new truck has been received and been equiped for service. It was expected that the 1976 unit would be sold through the Hennepin County Purchasing Program at a public auction. According to the Director of Finance/City Clerk the timing did not work out and bids were therefore sought for the outright sale of the truck. Two bids were received as follows: 1) Johnson Motor Sales, Inc. for $10,217 and 2) Lott Excavating for $6,155. It is the recommendation of Superintendent of Streets Arnie Erhart and Director of Finance Van Overbeke that the high bid be accepted and the truck be sold to Johnson Motor Sales, Inc. Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the sale tis ,the 1976 Ford L-8000 tandem dump truck which was declared as sAxXP3-U!s property as a part of the 1987 General Fund Budget. Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 AUDITING SERVICES/DELOITTE, HASKINS AND SELLS E. Auditing Services, Approval of Deloitte, Haskins and Sells as Auditors for the Year Ending 12 -31 -87 --The Director of Finance and City Administrator are recommending that Deloitte, Haskins and Sells be retained to provide auditing services for the year ending December 31, 1987. Enclosed on pages /C) through __L::? -is a memo from the Director of Finance and letter bf`-transmittal from Michael Vinyon, Deloitte, Haskins and Sells, regarding auditing services for this calendar year. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Deloitte, Haskins and Sells as auditors for the year ending December 31, 1987. MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: OCTOBER 9, 1987 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF DELOITTE HASKINS + SELLS AS AUDITORS FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1987 Attached please find a copy of a proposal from Deloitte Haskins + Sells to provide auditing services for the year ending December 31, 1987. They have audited the City's records for the past four years and I would recommend approval of this proposal by the City Council. Previous fees have been as follows: Year Ending Amount December 31, 1983 $19,500 December 31, 1984 20,750 December 31, 1985 22,550 December 31, 1986 24,100 December 31, 1987 22,500 Proposed Finance Department staff feels that DH+S has done a good, professional job of providing the required services and that the proposed rate is reasonable. As noted in the proposal, there is a slight reduction in costs since the City no longer has Federal Revenue Sharing money and the related "single" audit requirements of the Federal Government. Please let me know if you would like to discuss this matter in more detail or if you would like additional information. L�') Finan`e�i Director/City Clerk EJV/kf 1� Deloifte Haskins+Sells . Mr. Eugene J. VanOverbeke Finance Director City of Eagan P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Dear Mr. VanOverbeke: Suite 1000 625 Fourth Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1660 (612) 333-2900 Telex: 290234 July 31, 1987 As you requested, we are pleased to provide you with our proposed audit services for 1987, as well as our estimated fees for these services. We are also providing information on our training and quality control standards. SCHEDULE: Preliminary - One week in December, 1987 Final - Weeks of March 28, and April 4, 11, and 18, 1988 Report date goal - April 30, 1988 PERSONNEL: Michael J. Vinyon, Partner John B. Lilja, Manager Eric S. Rangen, In -charge Accountant Assistants to be named SERVICES: Our services to the City for 1987 will include the following: • General audit of the financial statements of the City . Audit procedures required by the Legal Compliance Audit Guide issued by the State Auditor. REPORTS: Our reports will include the following: • Auditors' Opinion for inclusion in your Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. . A report for State compliance purposes, including our reports on examinations of your systems of internal control and of legal compliance matters. Mr. Eugene J. VanOverbeke July 31, 1987 QUALITY CONTROL: As part of our ongoing program of quality control, Deloitte Haskins & Sells provides that: The above individuals who will be responsible for planning, directing, and reporting on the audit and who will be spending a substantial portion of the hours expended for the audit will have completed one or more continuing professional education programs in state and local government accounting, auditing, financial reporting, and related subjects. As a charter member of the SEC Practice Section of the AICPA Division for CPA firms, Deloitte Haskins & Sells submits to regular peer reviews of our accounting and auditing practice. Ernst & Whinney is presently conducting the current peer review, and we will provide their opinion concerning this review to you when it is available. In ttie past, this review has culminated in an unqualified opinion regarding our quality control system, and we expect a similar opinion from the current review. These reviews do include a representative sample of audits of governmental units performed by DH&S. DH&S agrees to permit a reporting to you by a professional society or licensing organization of the status and disposition of any investigation of our audits of the City requested by a Federal Inspector General or other appropriate official. FEES: We estimate that our professional fees, including expenses, will not exceed $22,500. This estimate recognizes that Eagan will no longer be subject to the "single" audit requirements of the Federal government in 1987. However, we have assumed no other change in your financial operations. In 1987, several new accounting pronouncements will have to be implemented, and our audit services will increase as a result, especially in regard to special assessments and pension plan reporting. We will discuss these matters with you as they are implemented. Should the Council have any questions regarding our reappointment, we would be pleased to respond to them. We look forward to continuing to serve the City of Eagan. Yours very truly, DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS 5 MichaI Vin, Partner / l to Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 SENIOR CITIZEN DEFERMENT/MARTHA DEHLER F. Senior Citizen Deferment, Special Assessment Deferment for Martha Dehler for Project 469 --The Director of Finance has received and processed an application for a senior citizen deferment for Martha Dehler who resides at 3106 Pilot Knob Road. According to Finance Director Van Overbeke, Mrs. Dehler has been assessed for the Towerview Road project at the City Council meeting of August 18, 1987. Mrs. Dehler has submitted the documentation as required by Section 2.75 of the City Code and is clearly eligible for this deferment. The Finance Director is requesting that the City Council take action to grant the deferment and that staff be directed to notify the Dakota County Auditor. Mrs. Dehler has been the sole owner of property located at 3106 Pilot Knob Road since 1963. Mrs. Dehler's husband is deceased. The amount of the assessment is $6,771.51. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the special assessment deferment for Martha Dehler for Project 469, granting a senior citizen deferment. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT/FIRE TRAINING FACILITIES G. Joint Powers Agreement for Fire Training Facilities --The City of Burnsville has approved a bid for construction of the fire training facility from Metcon Metro of Faribault. The total bid was $129,459 for construction of the building which is under the City's estimate of $132,656. According to the Burnsville City Attorney's Office, it is necessary for each city to agree to a revised agreement now that the cost and completion date has been changed. The cost allocation by each city and the completion date of June 1, 1988 is in order for consideration. The total user fee for the cities of Lakeville, Eagan and Apple Valley will be $43,664 each with the first installment due December 1, 19.87 and the second installment due upon certification by Burnsville that the fa ilities are complete and ready for use. Enclosed on page is a copy of the bid tabulation. -� ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the execution of an agreement that changes the cost and completion date as stated. 13 6 n :? o o o. ° _ (D � co w �°° o o m m ro � m V l� Fv� C z - r Z 'Z^ V/ v C o< 00 i Om Oma.' o r �! R1 D M r- CO� mz C) -1z NO 0 z > n 06) �n 37 Y cz 0 z z G) cm 2 c n c 0 Z m -+Z ZZ m N n�z -O-i �O r z a >9 > N D cn Ic m z z )i r -I n z O zz cn c 0 0 a _J O z o m m W I' m O o i O Ul c # -Z-+ Q> rn C N � i 0 M m p 0Y�N o m � r O p� R O'9 � 3` C� ii,, _d 1 to 0 t l,N o � I � V, p h O V, o , v p x x X x x > av my nm N b� _ m Zl c� > > 7K l� Fv� C z Z 'Z^ V/ v C 0v > f r M T R1 D M q- mm w 0 rn �n o in z o co ZZ m N o 0 'n > N D cn Ic o F z -I n -C APPROVE FINAL PLAT, BBD 2ND ADDITION H. Approve Final Plat, BBD 2nd Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the above referenced subdivision located east of Coachman Road and north of Yankee Doodle Road and further described by the proposed plat enclosed on page All conditions of the preliminary plat approved by Council a tion on August 18, 1987 have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application requirements have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the BBD 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. I w O - w ` o 0 w W � n Q� O ° 1 I y !1 I m Z,: yr,; �y�• � t o O ' )>✓JT 0.Y \ � � N ti ` Z l w O - I 1 I y !1 I m _ } �y�• � t o I " I ; ►i V L{/Q� r L PROJECT 523 (STONEY POINT & BLACKHAWK RIDGE - TRUNK WATERMAIN) RECEIVE PETITION ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT I. Project 523 (Stoney Point and Blackhawk Ridge/Trunk Watermain) - Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report --As a part of the revised comprehensive water distribution system plan, it is anticipated that a large diameter trunk watermain will be required to be constructed through the proposed subdivisions referenced above. Subsequently, the developer has submitted a petition requesting the City to initiate the installation of this trunk watermain to be concurrent with their proposed development schedule. In addition to requesting the feasibility report, the developer is requesting simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specifications to facilitate the construction schedule process. The appropriate guarantee of all costs has been provided as a part of this petition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and order the feasibility report with detailed plans and specifications for Project 523 (Stoney Point & Blackhawk Ridge - Trunk Watermain) I� Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 PROJECT 452R, POND AP -50 OUTLET (TO BE CONTINUED TO 11-5-87 A. Project 452R, Storm Pond AP -50 87) --On August 18th, the Council report for the storm sewer outlet Cliff Road and east of Scott Trail Park 2nd Addition. At that same scheduled to be held on October Outlet (To be continued to 11 -5 - received a revised feasibility for Pond AP -50 located north of behind the Cedarcliff Commercial meeting, a public hearing was 20th to discuss these proposed improvements. However, it is necessary to continue this public hearing until November 5th to insure that all potentially affected property owners from the various alternates will be properly notified of the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public hearing for Project 452R (Pond AP-50/Storm Outlet) to November 5, 1387. PROJECT 487R, BRAUN COURT (STREETS & STORM SEWER) B. Project 487R, Braun Court (Streets and Storm Sewer) --On October 6th, a second public hearing was held to discuss the installation of the proposed improvements under this project due to solicited bids iF exceeding the feasibility report estimate. At that meeting, there were comments by various affected property owners regarding their objection to a variety of issues associated with this project. Subsequently, the Council continued the public hearing until October 20th and directed staff to schedule another neighborhood meeting to discuss the issues involved to see if there was a consensus whether to proceed with the project or not. A neighborhood meeting was held at 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 14th. As a result of the neighborhood meeting held on October 14, the affected property owners indicated a strong desire to still proceed with the improvement. The main issue in the past pertained to the financing of the storm sewer lateral extension necessary to drain the .low landlock drainage basin'on Henry Braun's property. This was resolved by putting the entire cost of the storm sewer system in as a part of the overall cul-de-sac street construction and splitting the cost 50/50 between the property owners fronting the street on the north and south sides. This would delete any assessments from the property owners further to the south of Henry Braun which were technically located within the drainage water shed. Subsequently, the Council should reapprove Project 487R based on a revised pending assessment roll taking into consideration the agreement reached by major property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and reapprove Project 487R (Braun Court - Street/Storm Sewer) with a revised pending assessment roll. Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 PROJECT 449R, COUNTRY CLUB MARKET (DRIVEWAY/LANDSCAPING) C. Project 449R, Country Club Market (Driveway/Landscaping)--On October 6, a new public hearing was held to discuss the proposed improvements as a result of solicited bids exceeding the feasibility report estimate by more than 10%. At the October 6 hearing, a representative of the Cedarvale Bowling Lanes indicated a concurrence to proceed with the project. However, a representative of the Country Club Market requested additional time to investigate the feasibility in performing their related improvements privately subject to a special agreement. On October 9, a meeting was held with Mr. Bob Nelson of Country Club Market who, after reviewing detailed unit cost, plans and specification requirements, concurred with the concept of performing the improvements privately in accordance with a performance bond and special agreement. Therefore, it would be appropriate to approve the project for the Cedarvale Bowling Lane driveway construction only and delete the proposed improvements from the City contract associated with the Country Club Market. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the hearing and approve Project 449R (Country Club - Driveway/Landscaping) for the driveway improvements only. PROJECT 509, PATRICK ADDITION (STREETS & UTILITIES) D. Project 509, Patrick Addition (Streets and Utilities) --On October 6, the Council held a new public hearing to discuss the proposed improvements associated with this project due to the competitive bids exceeding the feasibility report estimate by more than 10%. At that time, a representative of the developer requested additional time to investigate the feasibility performing those improvements privately rather than through the City contract process. At the time of this packet preparation, the developer has not indicated his intentions to the City staff regarding the disposition of this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 509 (Patrick Addition - Streets & Utilities). PROJECT 516, GOPHER EAGAN IND PARK 2ND ADDITION (STREETS/UTILITIES) E. Project 516, Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition - (Streets and Utilities) --On October 6, the public hearing was held to discuss the proposed improvements associated with this project. At that time, a representative of Minnesota Fence Company expressed objections to the fact that they had not been notified by Gopher Smelting of the proposed improvements which may become a financial liability of their option to purchase lease agreement. Agenda Information October 20, 1987 Subsequently, the Council ,continued the public hearing until October 20th to allow Gopher Smelting an opportunity to discuss theproposed improvements with these tennants. Enclosed on page — (( is a letter from Mr. Mark Kutoff apologizing for the confusion' and lack of communication which resulted in a delay of this project. Enclosed on pages ,15' through _,,-.2 6 is again a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this continued public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close public hearing and approve/deny Project 516 (Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd .addition - Streets and Utilities). 0E (612) 454-3310 `J GOPHER SMELTIHG & REFING CO. Manufacturers LEAD PRODUCTS 3385 So. Hwy. 149 Eagan, Minnesota 55121-2395 October 7, 1987 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob P. 0. Box 21199 E aoan, MN 55121 Dear Mayor and Council Members, It has been made clear to me that I made a gross mistake in jud:;ement and fairness. It was certainly not our intention to try and "put something over" on anyone. I can not fault your decision to delay our projects for the reasons you stated. We appreciate all the excellent cooperation you have given us especially the extra effort extended to us by Tom Colbert and the entire engineering and planning staff. It is unfortunate that I made the mistake and do hereby apologize and hope that such incidents do not happen again. Sincer ly, Mark Kut'off ap cc Tom Colbert John Tapper ER ALAN INDUSTRIAL PARX 2nd ADDITION (YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EXTENSION) N UTILITY &STREET IMFROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT No. 516 A A T � MINNESOTA 198 File 4944! SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. t-jo ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 51 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. Otto 0. Booslraa, P.E. Glenn Cook. P£. _ Kuberi W, kusene, r £ Aruh 4. GurJun. Pt O Juseph C. Anderkk, P E. l hwnw t. Alavvv. r E Bradford A Lemberg, P.E. Rn hard WI'asmr P E. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers & Architects Richard E. Turner, P. E. James C. Otto„. P.E. Robert G S'huwch4 P E Marvin L. Sur..ia. Pt St. Paul, MN 55113 Punald C. Burgarai. P £ 612.636-4600 Jerry A. Bourdon. A E .,lark A. Haman, P.E. Ted A. Field, P E Unhurt T kawmann, P E August 24, 1987 Robe,tR I).JJrr1r.l'L _ Gdv'd G. Lwkuru. P L Thomas K'. Pnersun, r 6 Honorable ?Mayor and Council Muhael C LYncn. P.L. City of Eagan Karen L. If No PE James R Ahiland. P E 3830 Pilot Knob Road Aennein P. Andmun, P.E. AruhA. Bmnmann, P£. Eagan, MN 55122 Afadt R kaltt. PF. Robert C. Rossrk..4 1_4 Thomas E. Angus. P E. Re: Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition Scary L. monk, P% (Yankee Doodle Road Extension) Charks A LFA A wn Leo Pa.rbkv Utility and Street Improvements Harlan MWon Project No. 516 swan'W. Ebrrl'n File No. 49440 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addi- tion (Yankee Doodle Road Extension) Project No. 516. This report covers sani- tary sewer, storm sewer, water main, and street construction and includes a preliminary assessment roll. Re would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, �B�OJN�ES 00,�ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li Approved 6016e I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of th/ Sta,Je o0llinnesota. Date: by:�_�7 Department of Public Wor Date: �- I rk 'A. Hanson Reg. No. 6. SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of Yankee Doodle Road east of T.H. No. 149 approximately 960' and related utilities to serve Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 1st and 2nd Additions. The property abutting this section of roadway is undeveloped except for the west 400' on the north side which in - eludes Minnesota Pump an industrial use. The remaining property is zoned in- dustrial. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract and will be submitted to Dakota County for their approval. This section of Yankee Doodle Road will ultimately be owned and maintained by Da- kota County as a part of the easterly extension of Co. Rd. 28. TNT C OTTO 0 T nAT. Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes constructing an 891 diameter PVC sanitary sewer in Yankee Doodle Road easterly of T.H. No. 149 as shown on Figure No. 1. The sanitary sewer will connect to the existing 151V RCP trunk sanitary sewer which parallels T.H. No. 149. The sanitary sewer will be constructed at a proper elevation to serve the abutting property. Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a 12" diameter DIP water main in Yankee Doodle Road easterly of T.H. No. 149 as shown on Figure No. 2. The trunk water main will connect to the existing 20" DIP water main in T.H. No. 149. The proper number of valves, hydrants, and fittings are also included. This section of water main is located in the intermediate pressure: zone and will experience static and residual pressures of 66.0 and 48.9 psi respectively. Services - Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed to the property line to serve Lots 7, 14, 15, & 16, Block 1 Gopher Eagan Indus - Page 1. 6016e 7 trial Park lst Addition and Lot 3, Block 1 and Outlot D Gopher Eagan Industri- al Park 2nd Addition. Services are proposed to be 6" water and 6" sewer. Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein includes extending a 36" and 66" RCP storm sewer through the future Bur Oak Hills to be constructed in the summer of 1988. The 42" RCP storm sewer will be continued within an existing ravine to a point where it can be constructed along property lines in Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition to Yankee Doodle Road as shown on Figure No. 3. The storm sewer would be extended in Yankee Doodle Road west to T.H. No. 149 as a 36" RCP. This storm sewer is designed to convey drainage from both Gopher Eagan Industrial Park lst and 2nd Addition in addition to approximately 33 acres located west of T.H. No. 149. This 33 acres is presently undeveloped and drains through existing culverts beneath T.H. No. 149 and the railroad on- to Gopher Eagan Industrial Park lst and 2nd Additions. In addition its' proposed to extend an 18" RCP storm sewer northerly from the storm sewer in Yankee Doodle Road to the frontage road. Street - Street construction proposed herein includes extending Yankee Doodle Road easterly from T.H. No. 149 within the existing platted right-of-way of Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 1st Addition. The street sections includes a 9 -ton rural section with a 28' wide interim paved surface (2-14' wide driving lanes) and an 8' wide gravel shoulder along each edge. Also included is the required grading and restoration. The existing frontage road abutting T.H. No. 149 is proposed to be up- graded to a 36' wide street which will provide for a parking lane along its east side. The street will be upgraded to a 9 ton design thickness with con- crete curb and gutter. The street will terminate in a 45' radius cul-de-sac as shown on the attached drawing. It is assumed for purposes of this report there is no salvage value to the existing frontage road. It is assumed the excess material generated from the frontage road construction will help build the approach of Yankee Doodle Road to T.H. No. 149. Page 2. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA BUR OAK HILLS Outlot E GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK IST ADDITION Lot 1-16, Block 1 S 1/2, SECTION 12 Parcel 010-55 (Outlot B Gopber Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition) Parcel 010-57 (Lot 2, Block I gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition) Parcel 020-57 (Lot 1, Block 1 Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition) Parcel 014-80 (Lot 3, Block 1, Outlot B, C, and D - Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition) COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: Sanitary Sewer $ 37,660 Water Main 47,540 Services 21,140 Storm Sewer -Future Bur Oak Hills 60,560 Gopher Eagan Ind. Pk. 2nd Addn. 154,700 Street - Yankee Doodle Rd. 84,580 Frontage Road 76,260 TOTAL....................................... $482,440 The total estimated project cost is $482,440 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and includ` legal., engineering, administration and bond interest. Page 3. 6016e ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over 10 years at an interest rate based on the- bond sale financing this project. SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral sanitary sewer on a front foot basis to the property abutting the sanitary sewer in Yankee Doodle Road. Trunk area sanitary sewer was previously assessed under Project No. 29. Lateral benefit from the existing trunk sanitary sewer in T.H. No. 149 is proposed to be assessed in accordance with the Development Agreement for the Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition. WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess the cost of water main on a front foot basis to the property abutting the water main in Yankee Doodle Road. Trunk area water main was previously assessed under Project No. 50 and 179. Lateral benefit from the existing trunk water main in T.H. No. 149 is proposed to be assessed in accordance with the Development Agreement for Gopher Eagan Indus- trial Park 2nd Addition. SERVICES: It is proposed to assess the cost of services to the abutting lots they serve. STORM SEWER: A portion of the storm sewer proposed herein is considered trunk due to the fact it is designed to convey drainage from approximately 32.7 acres west of T.H. No. 149. Therefore, the oversizing costs are considered trunk and not proposed to be assessed. The lateral cost for storm sewer con- structed in Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition is proposed to be as- sessed on an area basis to Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 1st and 2nd Addition. The lateral cost assumes the same lineal feet of storm sewer pipe is construc- ted as presented in Appendix A, however, the lateral cost assume a 15" and Page 4. 6016e I C) 30" equivalent pipe are of sufficient size to provide. drainage from Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 1st and 2nd Addition in lieu of the 36" and 42" respect- ively. The lateral cost for storm sewer constructed in the "future Burr Oak Hills is proposed to be assessed to Outlot E in Bur Oak Hills. The lateral cost assume: the same lineal feet of pipe: is constructed as presented in Appendix A, however, the lateral cost assumes a 21" and 27" equivalent pipe are of sufficient size to provide drainage from Bur Oak Hills in lieu of a 36" and 66", respectively. Trunk area storm sewer for this area was previously assessed as part of Project No. 319 and 381. STREET: Yankee Doodle Road is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis to the abutting property it serves. The frontage road is also proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis to to Lot 1, Lot 2, Outlot A and Outlot B of Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition. Also included in the front foot assessment for the frontage road is the 18" storm sewer from Yankee Doodle Read serving the frontage road. Page 5. 6016e REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as fall)ws: Project Cost Revenue Balance A. SANITARY SEWER ' Lateral $ 375,660 Lateral Assessment $ 37,660 $ 37,660 $ 37,660 - 0 - B. WATER MAIN Lateral $ 47,540 Lateral Assessment S 47,540 $ 47,540 $ 47,540 -$ 2,081 C. SERVICES Lateral $ 21,140 Lateral Assessment $ 21,140 $ 21,140 $ 21,140 - 0 - D. STORM SEWER Trunk $ 75,930 Lateral 139,330 Lateral Assessment $139,330 $215,260 $139,330 -$75,930 E. STREET Lateral $160,840 Lateral Assessment $160,840 $160,840 $160,840 - 0 - It is anticipated $75,930 will be required from the trunk storm sewer fund to finance the cost of this project. Page 6. 6016( - PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans & Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 6016e Page 7. September 1, 1987 October 6, 1987 Fall, 1987 Winter, 1988 July, 1988 September, 1988 May, 1989 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION PROJECT NO. 516 A. SANITARY SEWER 900 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $20.00/lin.ft. $ 18,000 4 Each STd. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each 4,000 20 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 1,200 6 Each 8"x6" wye branch @ $82.00/each 490 1 Each Connect MH to ex. 15" RCP @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 200 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,000 900 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 900 100 Cu.yds. Total $ 27,590 990 Lin.ft. +5% Contingencies 1,380 Total $ 28,970 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 8,690 TOTALSANITARY SEWER ............................. $ 37,660 B. WATER MAIN 910 Lin.ft. 12" DIP Water main in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. $ 20,020 80 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft. 1,120 2 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 2,000 2 Each 12" Gate valve and box @ $1,000.00/each 2,000 3 Each 6" Gate valve and box @ $400.00/each 1,200 3,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.50/lb. 4,500 1 Each Connect 12" DIP to existing 20" DIP @ $2,000.00/ea. 2,000 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.090/cu.yd. 1,000 990 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 990 Total $ 34,830 +5% Contingencies 1,740 $ 36,570 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 10,970 6016e TOTALWATER MAIN ................................ $ 47,540 Page 8. 14 C. SERVICES 360 Lin.ft. 6" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $8.00/each 360 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main service @ $14.00/each 6 Each 1.211x6" tee @ 4800.00/each 6 Each 6" Cate valve & box @ $400.00/each 360 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTALSERVICES ................................... D. STORM SEWER a.) Future Bur Oak Hills 60 Lin.ft. 66" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $120.00/lin.ft. 500 Lin.ft. 36" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $50.00/lin.ft. 1 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,200.00/each 1 Each Std. 6' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $2,600.00/each 1 Each 66" RCP flared end @ $3,000.00/each 16 Cu.vds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 20 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/Ac. 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 560 Lin.ft. Mechanical Trench Compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies 6016e +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL.......................................... Page 9. V` $ 2,880 5,040 4;800 2,400 360 $ 15,480 780 $ 16,260 4,880 $ 21,140 $ 7,200 25,000 1,00 2.,600 3,000 800 3,000 1,000 560 $ 44,360 2,220 $ 46,580 13.980 $ 60,560 b.) Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition 60 Lin.ft. 30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $38.00/lin.ft. 540 Lin.ft. 36" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $44.00/lin.ft. 1,170 Lin.ft. 42" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $56.00/lin.ft. 9 Each Std. MH w/cstg. in p1. @ $1,500.00/each LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $1,500.00/L.S. 1 Each Connect to existing MH @ $500.00/each 3.0 Acs. Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500/ac. 1,770 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% contingencies +30. Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL............... , . ........................ E. STREET a.) Yankee Doodle Road 3,000 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. 2,850 Ton Class 5, 100% crushed quarry rock @ $8.00/ton 550 Ton Bituminous base course @ $14.00/ton 275 Ton Bituminous wear course @ $16.00/ton 45 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $180.00/ton 150 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.40/gal. 2.5 Acs. Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac. Total +5 Contingencies +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL.......................................... Page 10. 6016e $ 2,280 23,760 65,520 13,500 1,500 500 4,500 1,770 $113,330 5,670 $119,000 35,700 $154,700 $ 15,000 22,800 7,700 4,400 8,100 210 3,750 $ 61,960 3,100 $ 65,060 19,520 $ 84,580 b.) Frontage Road 2,000 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd. $ 10,000 1,300 Tran C1.5 Aggr. base, 100% crushed quarry rock @ $8.00/ton 10,400 400 Ton. 2331 Bituminous base course @ $14.00/ton x,600 200 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $16.00/ton 3,200 35 Tran. Bituminous material for mixture @ $180.00/t.on 6,300 110 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 1.65 1,200 Lin.ft. B618 Conc. curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin..ft. 6,000 300 Lin.ft. 18" RCP storm sewer @ $28.00/lin.ft. 8,400 1 Each Std 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000/each 1,000 2 Each Std CB w/cstg @ $800.00/each 1,600 300 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 300 700 Sq.yds. Sod w/3" topsoil @ $2.00/sq.yd. 1,400 1.0 Acre Seed w/3" topsoil, mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/Ac. 1,500 Total $ 55,865 +5% Contingencies 2,735 $ 58,660 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest. 17,600 TOTAL............................................ $ 76,260 Page: 11. 6016e APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION PROJECT NO. 516 A. SANITARY SEWER Parcel Assessable Total Descrivtion Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK IST ADDITION Lot 7, Block 1 120 $22.83 $ 2,740 Lot 14, Block 1 217 22.83 4,954 Lot 15, Block 1 200 22.83 4,566 Lot 16, Block 1 269.52 22.83 6,153 GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION Parcel Lot 2, Block 1 355 $22.83 $ 8,105 Lot 3, Block 1 338 22.83 7,717 Outlot D 150 22.83 3,425 Lot 16, Block 1 1,649.52 28.82 $ 379660 B. WATER ;LAIN EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION Parcel Lot 2, Assessable 355 Total Description Lot 3, Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 1ST ADDITION 150 28.82 Lot 7, Block 1 120 $28.82 $ 3,458 Lot 14, Block 1 217 28.82 6,254 Lot 15, Block 1 200 28.82 5,764 Lot 16, Block 1 269.52 28.82 7,768 GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION Lot 2, Block 1 355 $28.82 $ 10,232 Lot 3, Block 1 338 28.82 9,741 Outlot D 150 28.82 4,323 1,649.52 $ 47,540 Page 12. 6016e C. SERVICES Parcel Block 1 2.55 Area Total Description Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 1ST ADDITION EAGAN INDUSTRIAL Lot 7, Block 1 1 $3,523 $ 3,523 Lot 14, Block 1. 1 3,523 3,523 Lot 15, Block 1 1 3,523 3,523 Lot 16, Block 1. 1 3,523 3,523 GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION 1,735 Lot Lot 3, Block 1 1 $3,523 $ 3,523 Outlot D 1 3,523 3,523 0.6 2,891 6 Lot $ 21,140 D. STORM SEWER Parcel Block 1 2.55 Area $ 8,241 Total Description 2.4 2,891 (Acre) Rate/Acre Assessment GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK IST ADDITION A 0.8 Lot 1, Block 1 0.6 $2,891 $ 1,735 Lot 2, Block 1 0.6 2,891 1,735 Lot 3, Block 1 0.6 2,891 1,735 Lot 4, Block 1 0.6 2,891 1,735 Lot 5, Block 1 0.6 2,891 1,735 Lot 6, Block 1 0.8 2,891 2,313 Lot 7, Block 1 0.6 2,891 1,735 Lot 8, Block 1 0.6 2,891 1,735 Lot 9, Block 1 0.6 2,891 1,735 Lot 10, Block 1 0.5 2,891 1,446 Lot 11, Block 1 1..3 2,891 3,759 Lot 12, Block 1 2.3 2,891 6,650 Lot 13, Block 1 1.1 2,891 3,181 Lot 14, Block 1 1.0 2,891 2,891 Lot 15, Block 1 1.0 2,891 2,891. Lot 16, Block 1 2.1 2,891 6,072 a GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 2.55 $2,891 $ 8,241 Lot 2, Block 1 2.4 2,891 6,939 Lot 3, Block 1 3.4 2,891. 9,831 Outlot A 0.8 2,891 2013 Outlot B 7.8 2,891. 22,553 Outlot C 2.0 2,891 5,783 Outlot D 3.8 2,891 10,987 37.95 $109,730 BUR OAK HILLS sOutlot E Lump Sum $ 29,600 6016e Page 13. 0 E. STREET a.) Yankee Doodle Road Parcel 1 355 Assessable $ 18,203 Total Description 338 51.28 _Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 1ST ADDITION 1,649.52 Lot 7, Block 1 120 $51.28 $ 6,153 Lot 14, Bleck 1 217 51.28 11,127 Lot 15, Block 1 200 51.28 10,255 Lot 16, Block 1 269.52 51.28 13,820 GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION 150 Lot 2, Block 1 355 $51.28 $ 18,203 Lot 3, Block 1 338 51.28 17,331 Outlot D 150 51.28 7,691 Total 1,649.52 $ 84,580 b.) Frontage Road Parcel Assessable Total Description Footage Rate/FF Assessment GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION Lot 1 250 $125.02 $ 31,255 Lot 2 150 125.02 18,752 Outlot A 60 125.02 7,501 Outlot B 150 125.02 18,752 Total 610 $ 76,260 Page 14. 6016e SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION PROJECT NO. 516 GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 $ 8,241 $ 31,255 $ 39,496 Street Block 1 $ 8,105 $10,232 6,939 $183203 18,752 62,231 Lot 3, Block 1 Yankee 9,741 Parcel 17,331 Sanitary Water A Storm Doodle: Frontage 2,313 Description 7,501 Sewer Main Services Sewer Road Road Total GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 1ST ADDITION 5,783 Lot 1, Block 1 D 3,425 4,323 $ 1,735 7,691 $ 1,735 Lot 2, Block 1 1,735 Outlot 1,735 Lot 33% Block 1 $ 29,600 TOTAL 1.,735 $37,660 1,735 Lot 4, Block 1 1,735 1,735 Lot 5, Block 1 1,735 1,735 Lot 6, Block 1 2,313 2,313 Lot 7, Block 1 $ 2,740 $ 3,458 $ 3,523 1,735 $ 6,153 17,609 Lot 8, Block 1 1,735 1,735 Lot 9, Block 1 1,735 1,735 Lot 10, Block 1 1,446 1,446 Lot 11, Block 1 3,759 3,759 Lot 12, Block 1 6,650 63650 Lot 13, Block 1 3,181 3,181 Lot 14, Block 1 4,954 6,254 3,523 2,891 11,127 28,749 Lot 15, Block 1 4,566 5,764 3,523 2,891 10,255 26,999 Lot 16, Block 1 6,153 7,768 3,523 6,072 13,820 37,336 GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 $ 8,241 $ 31,255 $ 39,496 Lot 2, Block 1 $ 8,105 $10,232 6,939 $183203 18,752 62,231 Lot 3, Block 1 7,717 9,741 $ 3,523 9,831 17,331 48,143 Outlot A 2,313 7,501 9,814 Outlot B .22,553 18,752 41,305 Outlot C 5,783 5,783 Outlot D 3,425 4,323 3,523 10,987 7,691 29,949 BUR OAK HILLS Outlot E $ 29,600 $ 29,600 TOTAL ...... $37,660 .$47,540 $21,140 $139,330 $84,580 $ 60,840 $391,090 Page: 15. 6016e / > NORTH 0 300, r, ' ' I BUR IOAK IH/LLS I ( I 1 t �`.LOU'LLOTI >?-7—T--T'—r 7—T --r-- 1-- -j POND I I 1 I I I I i j-----� (806.6 8200 ��- ----� ----I - I GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd ADDITION OUTLOT BOUTLOT C y 1 R. 6 "� t 2 c Ex. 15" RCP � .� 15 16 3 OUTLOT D I ROPOSE 8" PVC 010-77 YAN EE DOODLE RD. 12 EAGAN INDUS GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd ADD SANITARY SEWER CITY PROJECT No. 516 EAGAN, MINNESOTA (-,q -;�" II 6 PARK /s! 1ADD1r10N BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIX & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers A Architects St. Paul. Minn. Dote: AUGUST,1987 Comm. 49431 FIGURE No. I I 7 L) p 14 020-77 W W W 8 2 YLL- U- Q O 9 3 p 13 r n 4 10 : OUTLOT 5 B O 12 EAGAN INDUS GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd ADD SANITARY SEWER CITY PROJECT No. 516 EAGAN, MINNESOTA (-,q -;�" II 6 PARK /s! 1ADD1r10N BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIX & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers A Architects St. Paul. Minn. Dote: AUGUST,1987 Comm. 49431 FIGURE No. I NORTH r --T 0 300' EBUR IOA/C iN/L.LS ��.L OULLOT I E POND 820.0 i I E GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd ADDITION Cn OUTLOT 8 �{I, j Of ? 00TOUTLOT C �'0� I 1 1---r--�- - - 1 1 I R. 0. 2 1 � 15 ILV Ex. 20" DIP OUTLOT 0 PROPO 12" DIP YAN EE DOODLE RD. 12 GOPHER EAGAN INDUS GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd ADD. WATER MAIN CITY PROJECT No. 516 Q 5 II f PARK /St DD/T/ON 010-77 020-77 OUTLOT 0 BONE STROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers i Architects St. Paul. Minn. Dote: AUGUST,1987 (EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49431 FIGURE No. 2 7 1 U p Lv 8 2 O 9 3 him 10 4 Y Q 5 II f PARK /St DD/T/ON 010-77 020-77 OUTLOT 0 BONE STROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers i Architects St. Paul. Minn. Dote: AUGUST,1987 (EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49431 FIGURE No. 2 0 300' 8LiR OAK H/qLS L {. I } \�—L--UT, l T E� I 806.5 '36" ` 1 36" 166" 820.0 GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK j �1 /`� PROPOSED 2nd ADD/TION �� -r\ �; ,'`�-,STORM SEWER OUTLOT B 42 �� . �� (��OAK HILLS) "` pUjLOt P { OUTLOT C PROPOSED STORM SEWER (GOPH 76-w\:-2 ND) 42„ 3 OUTLOT D FRONTAGE ROD 1 E 8 STORM SEW 1..W- YANEE DOODLE R� 010.77 36"� D. 15 14 020-77 W W 8 2 W Y U_ 16 0O 9 3 p Q J• 13 �- 10 4 Y OUTLOT O 5 B 12 II 6 GOPHER EAGAN /NOUS TR AL PARK /St 1A DD/T/ON GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd ADD. STORM SEWER CITY PROJECT No. 516 EAGAN, MINNESOTA SONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK 3 ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers 4, Architects St. Paul, Minn. 7 Dote: AUGUST,19e7 Comm. 49431 FIGURE No. 3 NORTH !— — T r r O 300' \ IBUR lOAK HILL I`�: 1 0UTILOT E I `� �-J►1 E /,r T ? T i' -T — ?-- 1- _ _1 i j I PN GI 806.5 �.""—. `820.0 ! � 6 GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd ADDITION OU TLOT a —PROPOSED 36' URBAN SE T10f�. WITH 8618 CONO G 81 G. 001 0T �/ I GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd ADD. STREETS CITY PROJECT No. 516 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTPIOO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers, & Architects, St. Paul, Minn. Dote AUGUS1,1987 Comm. 49431 FIGURE No. 4 7 6 U p LU 8 2 0 9 3 p 10 4 BONESTPIOO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers, & Architects, St. Paul, Minn. Dote AUGUS1,1987 Comm. 49431 FIGURE No. 4 NORT H 0 400' r— .."n%. -- ' 1- -- - LATERAL AREA STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY (BUR OAK MILLS) V- —� 21 �� I ! • \ \ / ��—LOULLOT POND , T I —f LL Sl A! B( ICS IN 2 GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd ADD. ASSESSMENTS CITY PROJECT No. 516 �- EAGAN, MINNESOTA r �1`✓ SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers i Architects St. Paul, Minn. Dote AUGUST,19$7 Comm. 49431 FIGURE No. 5 Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1937 VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT (LOT 1, BLOCK 4 OAK CLIFF 1ST ADDITION) F. Vacation of Utility Easement, (Lot 1, Block 4, Oak Cliff 1st Addition) --On September 15th, the Council received a petition and subsequently scheduled a public hearing to be held on October 20 to consider the vacation of a portion of an existing side lot line utility easement along the west line of the above referenced parcel. This utility easement was dedicated for the purposes of, and currently incorporates, a sanitary sewer lateral servicing this subdivision located approximately 20 feet deep. This encroachment occurred through an error in the Certificate of Survey prepared for the building permit application which referenced only a 5 foot side lot easement instead of the 10 foot easement dedicated with the final plat. Once this was discovered, the builder was contacted and informed of three options to pursue in the resolution of this problem identified as follows: 1) To remove the encroachment of the third car garage stall. 2) To construct a new sanitary sewer line at another location. 3) To petition for a vacation of a portion of the easement to allow the encroachment. Because of the considerable expense associated with alternates number 1 and 2, the builder, homeowner and land surveyor elected to pursue the third alternate allowing the encroachment. Due to similar problems that staff has encountered in a similar situation in the Brittany 7th Addition pertaining to liability associated with future settlement of footings constructed within the backfill area and limited ability to excavate for any potential future relpairs, this encroachment should be allowed only subject to the property owners execution of a recordable agreement relieving the City of any liabilities for the encroachment. The remaining issue then pertains to the potential substantial costs associated with reconstruction or repare costs due to the footing being only 7 foot away from a 17 foot + or - deep sewer. The status of the execution of this agreement and any other liability related issues will be addressed by ou City Attorney during this public hearing. Enclosed on page is a copy of the Certificate of Survey showing the portion of the utility easement requested to be vacated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close public hearing and approve/deny the partial vacation of a utility easement as described over Lot 1, Block 4, Oak Cliff lst Addition. CP 7 �* rt * PIONEER LAND%URVeyoRy. rIVIL LNGINLLR9 * engineering LANL . PLter` --- ANNE 11S •LAN DSC AVE Akr:Ml TECTS * 4t * * 2422 Erlt..:pr„n Ef, - Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (6 12) 681 1914 �” DUpNE_,I (3UICDE2S, INC. - Ce7t7hdate n1 Survey far. :r rb. MES STREET 7 `. In.c � N ` V cv O ate_ O Cj �T cr, S V` 4 • 3 Z v : r M : N v ' l• V •;, 11 � v nN to n ' 4 I � 7 `. In.c cafe ;Bch, do n ---- --- 45.16 eanngs shown ore asps ume4, r> D1:::ina:-ie and Utility easanent t0 Ue in that part of Lot 1, Block 4, CLIFT LSi rDLDI ION, as piatteJ an: of record In the County Recorders Office In Z.,:ata Courcy, Minnesota descrined as follows: Co mencinj at the northwest corner of said Lot 1; t len, a on an assLaC,3 :�_ar ing of South 21 degrees 48 minutes 25 second= F ; t, along the w st_rl} line of said Lot 1, a distance of 53.1, .:met; L;exe North 6d da,r s ll manures 35 sc-c„xis E:,S:, a d_starce cf .2� feet to the 7.:lCa of LSF-girming Of ti,e Ease:rent to L-- dcScr iDcti; menci- Nor C: 76 dt^r=ea 54 s.inutes 4�:- sec -finis Esst, a distance of 2.722 f&et tU its :;l�ers2CC:o. with a line d?sta•lt IC.0U -- feet east ]t Of aCk: tw:railel �.'1:.• tile' said ktiSt2r1v line; &-ence North 21 c]ctjrc•e:s 49 min-tes Lo sccorus est, along said parallel line, 14.96 feet; thence south 11 do -Trees 05 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of 14.50 feet to the pjint of i>eginning• d fip+edaa I r: [,dy ed•g9 rh•s s.rt ae;•, yu an n= re•dra:t n -M, 4 •yra,arnd das Bey ulr re; �,rkLf, auk • bar n!.Olki 9fi,er fi cru .l . d + ,.YMeY.ri Sac,d ',•irarvrr uc urrrter It:e I,rs. , v5 tt+c ;SSe:x• �n5 AJl,,InalaUtm i^rstx.9 tihrs:A�+'r y �� ,�,,,. pp,pN' °�`d f .'7 � N ` V cv O O Cj �T cr, S O cafe ;Bch, do n ---- --- 45.16 eanngs shown ore asps ume4, r> D1:::ina:-ie and Utility easanent t0 Ue in that part of Lot 1, Block 4, CLIFT LSi rDLDI ION, as piatteJ an: of record In the County Recorders Office In Z.,:ata Courcy, Minnesota descrined as follows: Co mencinj at the northwest corner of said Lot 1; t len, a on an assLaC,3 :�_ar ing of South 21 degrees 48 minutes 25 second= F ; t, along the w st_rl} line of said Lot 1, a distance of 53.1, .:met; L;exe North 6d da,r s ll manures 35 sc-c„xis E:,S:, a d_starce cf .2� feet to the 7.:lCa of LSF-girming Of ti,e Ease:rent to L-- dcScr iDcti; menci- Nor C: 76 dt^r=ea 54 s.inutes 4�:- sec -finis Esst, a distance of 2.722 f&et tU its :;l�ers2CC:o. with a line d?sta•lt IC.0U -- feet east ]t Of aCk: tw:railel �.'1:.• tile' said ktiSt2r1v line; &-ence North 21 c]ctjrc•e:s 49 min-tes Lo sccorus est, along said parallel line, 14.96 feet; thence south 11 do -Trees 05 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of 14.50 feet to the pjint of i>eginning• d fip+edaa I r: [,dy ed•g9 rh•s s.rt ae;•, yu an n= re•dra:t n -M, 4 •yra,arnd das Bey ulr re; �,rkLf, auk • bar n!.Olki 9fi,er fi cru .l . d + ,.YMeY.ri Sac,d ',•irarvrr uc urrrter It:e I,rs. , v5 tt+c ;SSe:x• �n5 AJl,,InalaUtm i^rstx.9 tihrs:A�+'r y �� ,�,,,. pp,pN' °�`d f .'7 Aaenda Information. Memo October 20, 1987 ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PARCEL 011-75, BORCHERT-INGERSOLL A. Acquisition of Right -Of -Way, Parcel 011-75, Borchert -Ingersoll -- Mr. Ernie Peacock, representing Borchert -Ingersoll Company, has requested the City of Eagan to assist them in the acquisition of appropriate public right-of-way to their current "landlocked" parcel located in the southeast quarter of Section 11. Enclosed on pages through ^ 2 are two letters Mr. Peacock has submitted -to tiz City of Eagan regarding this matter. Enclosed on pages through is a response from the Director of Public Works incorporating a topographic map showing the relationship of this "landlocked" parcel to the Borchert -Ingersoll pond and related drainage and utility easements. At the present time, the staff has not received any specific site use plans to determine where the most appropriate public access should be provided if and when it was acquired by the appropriate party. Enclosed on page is a copy of the grading plan approved by Council action on eptember 15 for the Gopher Smelting property located to the south, which shows an appropriate location for future public road access to this parcel. The Public Works Director and City Planner will be available to discuss this issue in further detail at the Council meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS to provide public right-of-way (Borchert -Ingersoll). ITEM: To approve/deny the request to parcel 011-75 in Section 11 Business Properties Division August 4, 1987 Dale Runckle City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Dale: fa- elloo- 0//-71- I just wanted to follow up on our conversation of last week. You will recall that I -gave you a copy of a drawing which would allowed for access to a parcel of land I represent. To be specific I represent BORCHERT-INGERSOLL Company who would like to sell approximately 70 acres of land between Mike Collins Drive and Highway 149 and to the north of Yankee Doodle Road. A few years ago a ponding easement was increased and for all practical purposes a portion of the 70 acres became land locked. Some quick calculations would indicate that approximately 21 acres are involved. Sometime ago I contacted Paul Hauge, the attorney who represents your city. A Mr. Keller, a representative of the Hauge Firm, gave me a letter dated June 29, 1987 which indicated my clients did sign an agreement that in effect that allowed for the new easement. My clients however were not aware of the predicament this new easement agreement caused. After reviewing the information I put together on the parcel, it became apparent that access to the southwesterly part of the land was currently in accessible (see enclosed drawing). I talked to some of the neighbors and found that a company relatively close to the land had an interest in the Borchert property but some form of access was necessary to make the deal work. When I examined the half section map I noticed that the parcel of land I represent and the parcel of land owned by the interested party were relatively close and with the acquisition of some sort of easement across an adjoining parcel I could provide the interested party with access to my clients parcel and therefore consummate the sale of their land locked land. I spoke to the owner of the land over which access was necessary, Mark Kutoff of Gopher Smelting and Refining Co., but he had reservations because it might effect his land. I was advised that Mr. Kutoff had retained Pioneer Engineering to do some preliminary designing on his land so I also contacted Pioneer with the thought of designing an access that would work for everyone. Northland Plaza, Suile 770 Individual hleuibership, Society- of Industrial REALTORS 3800 West 8uth Street Nahundl Aswelation ut Industrial and Ullice Pdrls Bloomington, N1N 55.137 (672) 896-3636 1 ceruhrd Commercial Investment member Mr. Runckle August 4, 1987 Page 2 The concept was taken under advisement by Pioneer Engineering and a drawing was completed that reflected an easement from Barrel Reconditioners, across the Gopher Smelting property to the Borchert parcel. When I discussed this proposal with you, you indicated that you wanted to have a regular road easement to the parcel and that my proposal was unexceptable. My dilemma is this, I have a 20 acre parcel without access caused by the City of Eagan due to the increased ponding easement and I cannot sell the parcel because access cannot be provided? It is my thought that if the City of Eagan created this situation, than they should provide me with a solution to resolve this matter and allow me to sell the parcel. I currently have a prospective buyer but he may elect to look elsewhere if the matter cannot be resolved shortly, thereby causing my client to loose a potential buyer. I would like to have you and representatives from your city review this matter and advise me as to how you can resolve this problem. Time is critical in this issue so I would like to hear from you as quickly as possible. Sincerely, .4 04.s�� Ernie Peacock Business Properties Division cc: Lowell.Anderson Borchert -Ingersoll ErL)3� Business Properties Division EzAn 7.- Business Properties Division September 10, 1987 Beatta Bloomquist Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Miss Bloomquist, I e) -o t t o u- 01 I- 73' On September 1, 1987 I attended a City Council meeting and spoke to the council with reference to a parcel of land I represent for Borchert -Ingersoll Company. You will recall that we have a parcel of land that has been land locked because of an increase in a ponding easement on the property. I have enclosed two drawings, the first drawing illustrates the predicament we're in. The blue line indicates the approximate increase in the ponding area and the orange line represents the land locked parcel itself. The second drawing reflects an attempt to provide access to the parcel via acquisition of a small corner of land, owned by Gopher Smelting, in the southwest corner of our parcel. Barrell Reconditioning Company has expressed an interest in the parcel for their own use if access could be gained and exceptable terms could be worked out. Based on this information, Pioneer Engineering was retained to devise a plan that would allow direct access to our parcel via the acquisition of the corner piece of the Gopher Smelting property (see drawing). This proposal however was not excepted by Gopher Smelting or the City of Eagan Planners. It is our position that when the City of Eagan increased the ponding area it rendered the position of land in question, "Land Locked". Under these conditions we can not sell the property. We currently have an interested buyer in the parcel of land that is land locked but we can not provide access and are therefore prohibited from making a transaction. Northland Plaza, Suite 110 lndwidual Membership. Society of Indo+trial RfAHOR.S 3800 West 80th Street Naoonat Association of Indu_%tual and Office Parks Bloomington, NfN 55431 (612) 896-3636 ( -Ttint-d Cumrnctrial Imrshnent Memher We would like the City to review the matter as quickly as possible and devise a plan that would provide us the access necessary to sell this parcel. Would you take the necessary steps to start this action and advise me as to how the matter will progress. Should you have any questions would you please contact me at my office. I appreciate your prompt attention in this mater and look forward to a quick resolution to this problem. Sincerely, �IIIK�� Ernie Peacock Business Properties Division enclosure cc: Tom Eagan Vic Ellison James Smith Ted Uachter Tom Colbert Dale Runchle Paul Houge EP/110 Ma --Qn Business Properties Division :i T• p n � 24 rw i • \ —_ - • ay 7 i` 1 PART OF OIO-!9 dl 110, .0.8 :,_ ^ -i• ..fir BQ'I %yc •.'� ..X .... � _ J � � -`�. Nom,,,. J••�1� '•,'.LI.�'�� :`'f • 2rl ♦�1� Q H A _•.. 1}!,� IEI YOf�'RLL INC ZEST AOOITI ON :€ 4 SNC ORG FRS; NG I BORCMERT \ 1 /gT q00 i_ERS044 ' 1 ° PART Of LOT , ON i 011-50 1 4 •f �ti 4 i� /f .c 010-Tf 010-31 PART OF 0 29 PA 01 a . J.1+ndqu Hitghu, JAN 65120 W, 4 ISN/r� !II/f rII !I!r 7 7 "G'. it V PO I�4 eg 0 a oleo S \ s AN . \ r ` �• V v i I i l i dlal�' t 84CiiEPT-rhl4EeS0 -•- SW Orn?r OTINC. 1.6r Ap 104W cr .t • v N PAK4EL 1 a V 0 0 a rib 0 g1'0 S \ s AN . \ r ` �• V v 'XB3 • �% %\ .n ��.,\ s Ir v ., 1Q4p4`�' 4Z 2s 'W� I ccs l.1 J7 E'/zlhpl theaf I p� POINT OF p 9 V 4w Gp `�'p4 \ 5E. 4 Ac ,jr 09 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH MC ELLISON THEODORE WA CHTER October 15, 1987 Council Memoersaers THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator ERNIE PEACOCK EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk EDINA REALTY - BUSINESS PROPERTIES DIV NORTHLAND PLAZA SUITE 110 3800 W 80TH ST BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 Re: Parcel 10-01100-011-75 (Borchert -Ingersoll) Access to "Landlocked" Property Dear Mr. Peacock: Your letters to Mr. Dale Runkle (August 4) and Mayor Blomquist (September 10) have been to forwarded to my attention for review and comment by way of our City Administrator's response (September 14) to your attention. I have been made further aware of your concerns through various telephone conversations regarding the issue and your comments that were expressed at a public hearing held on September 1, 1987 regarding a grading permit issuance to Gopher Smelting for the property located immediately south of and adjacent to the above referenced parcel. In researching this property, the above referenced parcel is formally "landlocked" inasmuch as it does not have any access to public dedicated right-of-way. However, you contend that the specific portion located southwest of the Borchert -Inger so1 1 pond is further landlocked by the dedication of a drainage and utility easement incorporating said pond referenced as Pond EP -2 on the City's Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan. You have alluded to the fact that without this dedicated easement, this parcel could have obtained access from parcel 10-01200-011-50 located adjacent and to the east of this parcel in question. In reviewing topographic maps, it is the City's contention that this parcel in question was landlocked by topography and Department of Natural Resources' (DNR) jurisdiction of public waters prior to the City's acquisition of the referenced drainage and utility easement. The DNR -designated controlled water elevation of 830.5 completely severs the southwestern portion of this parcel from the northeastern portion and the adjacent easterly parcel previously referenced. I am enclosing with this letter a two -foot topographic contour map showing the relationship of the property lines of the parcels in question to the ponding area and easements. THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY E' ERNIE PEACOCK OCTOBER 15, 1987 PAGE TWO Therefore, the City does not feel that its amicable, negotiated acquisition of this easement from the owner of the property created a "landlocked parcel" that did not previously exist based on natural topography and other jurisdictional agency constraints. Subsequently, I do not feel that the City of Eagan should be responsible for acquiring public right-of-way access to this parcel from adjacent property owners. Rather, I feel that the acquisition of this right-of-way should be the responsibility of the property owner at a location that best fits all affected properties' concerns. However, with the grading permit issued to the Gopher Smelting property to the south, the City did require them to provide a grading plan that could accommodate future right-of-way access from Yankee Doodle Road to the south. While this does not grant the right-of-way access at this time, it provides a reasonable and logical access for potential future development of this property subject to the acquisition and/or dedication of the appropriate right-of-way across the Gopher Smelting property to the south, and upgrading of the access road to appropriate City standards. I hope that this background information has provided you with additional insights as to why I do not feel the City of Eagan should be responsible for the acquisition of public access per your request. However, should you be able to obtain the appropriate permit for encroachment in public waters from the DNR, the City will consider a vacation of a portion of the drainage and utility easement across the south property line, allowing a roadway access to be constructed connecting this parcel with the adjacent parcel to the east. This would be subject to submission of the appropriate grading, storm sewer, and street construction plans necessary to evaluate the loss of storm water storage volume required to be replaced in like kind from the adjacent properties to this public waters storm water pond. If you would like to review and discuss this issue in further detail, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Enclosure cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney Dale Runkle, City Planner Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator TAC/mc q i q t 4_ J / J BORCHERT-INGERSOLL iuvn �{ •; '±� 1ST ADDITIONj:i' 1 r ..B:::iii::::::::::.•.....;:ii�'tiii?::• •La ::.............s:.;�e . !..... _ :�aiii•.iFEiiiiiiiiiiii • :E}iEi^s {tta • ,1 t l � it '' .�.:�• iii i - �• r \ Ta i --- - - -_ $ \� '�'., =',. �.\ ♦ SL`s,'' �:iiili:j::' _ .�� 't,, t .� ♦11 �r t I • ••Hii li i , u >- ":' o � , • j ::. i:a , IN .. ; +..e- ---�� - �,�♦` l r �', 3..��•1 � �. �� ��;� t� I -� ell,\\``� \ Ia �l 11 t ' 1 FI 111 A- - , ♦iy'. ,:t.• ly` �yj �1 , `� _ 1'\. _ .-.:lC•�-1 - _>.X --• } al I\ 7 011-50 011-75NIL t J) iEEiEE �r1•:'1��, ::'E - � I,','' :::::::e:� : 1 � ', i 1♦• ._ �N,51 - 11 I T o�1 010-51 010-76 --IN, - a`T AN DOODLE AD _ _ - -- KEEL Dc-V_ ._•� - ViAli t '\ ' . . \� ♦ kJ V ♦\ � � . - :w �� � . 1� rf�� ��� �.•.. SL i. �•'.♦�, tp fl "a c'F"..'+ :.F•' }'�� �"i't' - `ter.....—� '``` `` . \. \`d t ; ,, l a t I � I i � /•'. � 5 i11• ! � I j �� • �, / � '+Ili i ., `:��.. ., ,.,,111• / rr � ,' r �( ! ! � �! .r 1 +' � / �/' iii ' /�^ -` `-'\ \ � �\ �`� ♦ \ :\•. � \'•''. \', \.. \ \ 1 ( I 1 Ol I f G%✓i ./,'.`. rr, I o \. �\•�`;`\ ;`.,,`\`•, \, �.1'.\ .t 1 1 , \ 111 tQ i Z, kill V 'I s ;' � �•._�- IS /^..t 111 i:i" � , ' I I' al CIA . . . . i� '}1., I��i��4� ! II�1 4�t�.\'1\.`\•. •:: 1 I i111j1 .. -__-�, !w '/---��' i R, 1J}T� 333 i ! :','�.�•� .,�c ',`` �'1 , .I / - 1 f • 1 �1{�1 ` !i: 1 Irl 1 .�. \ �_ _� /' '! I ) 1� i� i I ��6�y •l,'� i, ��� , 1 \i ', •I ilk'(, ```�`•� Il, r;,r^:I If10 l {; :--_ _ ---- Ir�r I- ``�`., '• .' '1 Ili It I \ ♦'',t1 , ,11,1 1 _ 111 N+ •1, • 1 I 'hl _ 1 / . .,•� r:it.; li' _ _ - '1 `'1 1 �\\U 1. 1`I'1I - t� J � :14%�;�'"1,";:'%�%/-!`tel i i i • it •q I',, -� -�-' �, :�• ''i"•'!:''♦ AZZ .>. i i. '• • \ `\`' ill i;�:i I�•k (!!,•. , .i ' -'" '.i- - � ��� � "• ' i . ''ill.: __ V s -'' �__-- ..I i '! ` � ,'• J7f.'i.: '/!. �. � _�+�-�_y-:rte-_•���_� 1� it \` 4 —._'l^ :l>.I,.i�` �_'- r• /J � ''i f i � 11 -\ •'•1 �,,�It v •I11 , . -1.�-`��`+'!I { 'lii' �• fr{JI �y '_'.�`1 i-li lil OI�1��;' `J - --_ _- ``. 1 �•1•• it � 1' ,•� f 1 •1.. . f I I�rl•I li ::' tl - - _- 1` •'`i �' ., 1';'l 1•, �'+�4����r• -'_%� ,,/�� ",iii"f,I i 'r ����`� I ' � �� • it � r• v "%'���'�- -',i 111 1 t S Vii:- ��- _,,�.�� �•/'•i,i ' � _. -� j..l�• !��/• T__'—'o.-- r - ��' __ is ' � l ' �' it NII ! �• ' - - _- _ -- -- - i • Vii'. I�• .... ; _ �.� %' . t wvd It 1 �..• i 1 _ _ -I= III -/; ; ; . I I, I .. ;-}�� 'i'=: �•� .' �� ,� ill' Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 ACCESSORY HOUSING PERMIT/MICHAEL KALZENBERG A. Accessory Housing Permit, 1725 Deerwood Drive for Michael Kalzenberg--Michael Kalzenberg who resides at 1725 Deerwood Drive made application for an accessory housing permit on August 25, 1987. Since this application is the first formal application received by the City for consideration of an accessory apartment, the Planning Department has carefully reviewed the intent of the ordinance and proposed accessory apartment to determine whether the unit meets the intent of the city ordinance. It was determined by the City Planner that the application appears to meet all the requirements of the Eagan City Code, Chapter 11.20, Subdivision 5.C.7. Therefore, a letter was sent to all residents within 200 feet of the Kalzenberg property stating that if any property owner wishes to object to the proposal, a written letter of appeal must be submitted to the City within 10 days of the date of that letter. The letter was mailed on Oc ober 9, 1987. For a copy of the City's notice, refer to page . For a copy of a rough drawing and sketch of the house, refer to pages i:3 through. This item appears on the City Council agenda due to an objection expressed by several neighbors in a petition dated August 26, 1987. The neighbors have asked that this item be heard by the City Council and are planning to attend the meeting on Tuesday to object to the accessory housing permit as requested by Michael Kalzenberg. Enclosed on pages ;-> through` is a copy of a brief update from City Planner Runkle including a petition received from home- owners in the area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the accessory housing permit as requested by Michael Kalzenberg of 1725 Deerwood Drive and, further, that action is required due to objections stated by residents within 200 feet of Kalzenberg's property. 5:. 7. pig 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPROVE ACCESSORY APARTMENTS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Please be advised that it is the intent of the City of Eagan Planning Department to approve the application for an accessory apartment at the following address: 1725 Deerwood Drive, Eagan, MN 55122 The application appears to meet all the requirements of Eagan City Code, Chapter 11.20, Subd. 5.C.7. You are hereby advised that if you wish to object to the proposal, that a written letter of appeal must be submitted to the City within ten (10) days of the date of this letter. The Eagan City Council will then make the final determination in regard to the application and may impose specific conditions or restrictive covenants in conjunction with the approval of the application for an accessory apartment. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Planning Department at #454-8100. DCR:ras Sincerley, Dale C. Runkle THE LONE OAK TREE. -THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY --OR 6al- aed ROO /Room A [Y ,)own r44.,, -.x H !IJrdi i Ni Q - I Loi i 1 QIQ w I )I It !IJrdi i Ni Q - I Loi i 1 QIQ w I )I MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE DATE: OCTOBER 16, 1987 SUBJECT: ACCESSORY HOUSING PERMIT] 1725 DEERWOOD DRIVE MICHAEL KELZENBERG The City has received an application for an Accessory Housing Permit located at 1725 Deerwood Drive. The Building Inspections Department and Planning Department have made the inspection of the unit at 1725 Deerwood Drive. This inspection has determined that the site plan with the parking spaces and external appearance will meet the accessory housing ordinance. The Building Inspections Department has also reviewed the interior in regard to the health and safety aspects of the City Code. Two conditions of approval were the relocation of certain smoke detectors and the installation of bigger windows in the bedrooms of the down -stairs unit. Two accesses from the downstairs are being provided. Therefore, the inspections made and the improvements would qualify this structure for the accessory housing component of the City Code. The City Code also allows for the ten-day notification of property owners within two -hundred feet. Notices have been sent to these property owners and it appears that on the notice, six residents would be notified. However, the City has received a petition from eleven property owners. With this petition, the staff has placed this permit on the City Council agenda for Council consideration. Attached is the petition submitted to the City regarding the accessory housing permit on Deerwood Drive. S#, -- City Planner Attachment DCR/kf S October 14, 1987 Mr. Dale Runkle, City Planner P.O. Box 21-199 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Runkle: This letter is in response to the NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPROVE ACCESSORY APARTMENTS. We, concerned homeowners of Eagan, request that you reconsider our letter of August 26 and not approve an application for the accessory apartment at 1725 Deerwood Drive. Attached is a copy of the August 26 letter. Many us have lived in our homes since the area was developed. We moved in because of the zoning and we want it to remain as single-family dwellings. We hope, you will consider our request to not approve the application, and also, put a stop to the present renting of the accessory apartment at 1725 Deerwood Drive. Again, thank you for your consideration of our request. Sincerely, Attachment cc: Mayor Bea Blomquist Councilmen: Theodore Wachter James A. Smith Thomas Egan Vic Ellison 210 �-k e. dqv.L.�, Y,4 /7�7 E�4v-vl 1717 Aet�� l7a6 - 5X4te-rez-4- 19-o e- 7 33 - 733 �)6 17 Z t Deer, w coc� f 73 ate-, 70 oC�� I-�z2 �8�.2P ate, August 26, 1987 Mr. Dale Runkle, City Planner P.O. Box 21-199 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Runkle: This letter is in regard to a matter that will be coming before you in the near future. We are concerned with the renting of the basement and single -room on the main floor in the house at 1725 Deerwood Drive. The owner of this house has been renting the two areas to non -family members since it was purchased in the fall of 1986. We feel that this should not be allowed since we are living in an area zoned for single-family dwelings. This practice of renting part of a house will lower the value our property. Most of us have lived in our homes since the area was developed. We moved in because of the zoning and we want it to remain as single-family dwellings. It is our understanding that according to the Eagan ordinance, which took effect April 2, 1987, the property must pass an inspection, and be approved by the City Planner for a permit to be issued. We hope, that when.the matter of issuing a permit to the owner of the property at 1725 Deerwood Drive comes before you, you will consider our request and not approve a permit. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Sincerely, cc: Mayor Bea Blomquist Councilmen: Theodore Wachter James A. Smith Thomas Egan Vic Ellison J-7/7 D-P--P-(-bUD o f 1-717 1) -e-et- (.v -D a d r 73 usl" • l l ' Ave--, Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 PRELIMINARY PLAT/BLACKHAWK GLEN 3RD ADDITION B. Preliminary Plat for Sienna Corporation, Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition Consisting of 33 Lots on 25.8 Acres --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on September 22, 1987, to consider a preliminary plat application for Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition consisting of 33 lots on 25.8 acres submitted by the Sienna Corporation. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of this item. For additional information, refer to the Planning and Engineering Departments reports found on pages T through. For a copy of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission recommendation for Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition, refer to pages 23 -.;2S For a7copy of the APC minutes for Blackhawk Glen, refer to page(s) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve or deny the preliminary plat for Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition as presented. �o SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (BLACKHAWK GLEN 3RD ADDN) APPLICANT: SIENNA CORPORATION LOCATION: SW 1/4 SECTION 16 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition. This proposal is for 33 single family lots on 25.8 acres located on Outlot B of the Blackhawk Hills Addition. That plat was rezoned R-1 in March 1970 and all conditions of that approval have been met with this proposal. This plat is in conformance with the January 1987 Land Use map that designates this area D-1 (0-3) units/acre. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently, this site is vacant and consists mostly of grassland with scattered immature scrub trees. A mature oak stand is on the western edge of this site and along the southwest property line. Minimal grading is proposed in these areas. This site is surrounded by R-1 plats: Blackhawk Hills to the west, Blackhawk Glen to the north (some lots undersized), Stoney Point to the northeast (some lots undersized), Blackhawk Ridge to the east and Blackhawk Park on the south. Outlot A (1.60 acres) and Outlot B (1.0 acres) will be dedicated to the City park system. SITE PLAN: One access to this site from Blackhawk Hills Road matching Ashbury Road to the north serves this site and connects to the Blackhawk Ridge Addition to the east. The shared cul-de-sac in excess of 500' received a Variance with the earlier proposal. The lot lines from the two plats line up well creating a nice overall consistency in the area.. A connection to the park on. the south has been provided jointly with the other plat. All lots exceed R-1 standards with a minimum lot area of 17,000 SF, averaging 26,492 SF. The average width at the setback line is 127'. Sienna Corporation will maintain architectural control on all homes for this single phase development. The number of builders has not been determined yet but the. proposed home/lot value will be in the $175,000 range. A Homeowners Association will be created to maintain aesthetic control of the area. The ponding area in the central portion of the site will be sealed so that when the water level drops, the Association can add more water bringing it up to the control level. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site consists of hilly topography with elevations ranging from a low of 790 at Blackhawk Lake to a high point of approximately 870 along the westerly side. The site grading includes the extension of Ashbury Road from Blackhawk Hills Road. The proposed street grades meet City of Eagan requirements thereby not exceeding the maximum allowable 8% grade. The site grading provides for a drainage basin located in the center of the development. It appears this basin is intended to be a wet pond with a proposed normal water elevation of 821 and a pond bottom of approximately 816. The high water level is proposed to be 824 resulting in a storage volume of approximately 6.2 ac/ft. Drainage within this site will be directed to this centrally located ponding area. This will require the catch basins proposed at the low point of Ashbury Road adjacent to Blackhawk Lake be connected to the inlet pipe to the pond as opposed to the outlet pipe from the pond. The development is proposing to provide an emergency overflow from the low point in Ashbury Road to the proposed ponding area. The approximate total drainage area to this pond is 64 acres requiring an outflow of 8-10 cfs based on the proposed storage volume of 6.2 ac/ft. The outlet pipe for the pond can be a submerged outlet due to the depth of the pond. The submerged outlet will provide skimming thereby allowing debris, etc., to remain in the pond prior to discharging to Blackhawk Lake. Slopes adjacent to the pond shall be constructed at a slope not to exceed the 4:1 criteria. The outlet pipe from the pond to Blackhawk Lake will require a permit from the Department of Natural Resources. An existing 18" storm sewer will discharge into the pond at its northerly end. The far end'elevation shall be constructed to be consistent with the normal water level of the proposed ponding area. Additional catch basins will be required at the southwest corner of Ashbury Road and Blackhawk Hills Road connecting to the existing storm sewer in Blackhawk Hills Road. The development shall be responsible for complying to the recommendations as made by the Dakota County Soil & Water' Conservation District. The recommendations from the Dakota County Soil & Water Conservation District are attached as part of the conditions of the staff report.. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer to serve this development will be provided from the existing trunk sewer in Blackhawk Hills Road along the easterly side of this development. The existing trunk sewer has adequate capacity to serve this development. The lots abutting the existing trunk along the east side of the site can be serviced by the existing trunk sewer. The development will be responsible for adjusting the existing manholes to match the proposed grades. Water service will be provided by the lateral water mains constructed from the existing 8" main in Blackhawk Hills Road. The development will be responsible for extending and connecting the lateral main in the easterly north/south cul-de-sac street abutting the proposed Blackhawk Ridge Addition to the existing 8" water main in Blackhawk Hills Road. House elevations below elevation 860 will require individual pressure reducing valves. V)-- STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: This site will be served by Ashbury Road connecting to Blackhawk Hills Road and the adjacent Blackhawk Ridge development to the east. The rights-of-way are all proposed to be 60' requiring 32' wide paved streets. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development will be responsible for providing all easements required for surface drainage, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water main systems and the park dedication along Blackhawk Lake. A pond easement shall be provided for the centrally located pond and Blackhawk Lake to their high water levels. Adequate right-of-way for Blackhawk Hills Road was previously dedicated with Blackhawk Glen lst Addition. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired in a timely manner as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed site has been previously assessed for sanitary sewer trunk, water area, water lateral benefit, sanitary sewer lateral benefit and storm sewer trunk. The proposed development is subject to the following pending assessments: "'-'.OJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 372 Street/Residential $29.49/ff 505 ff $14,922 Equivalent 372 Storm Sewer Lateral 9.24/ff 506 ff 4,675 TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENTS .......... $19,597 The proposed site is subject to the following proposed assessments as a condition of final plat approval. PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE,, QUANTITY AMOUNT 88 Lateral Benefit $15.06/ff from Sanitary Sewer 500 ff $ 7,530 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. l5 CONDITIONS: BLACKHAWK GLEN 3RD ADDITION 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. A copy of the Homeowners Association shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review. 3. There shall be no driveway access into Blackhawk Hills Road. 4. Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, shall have their driveways connect to the internal street, not Blackhawk Pt. 5. The development shall be responsible for completing the water main loop from the easterly adjacent cul-de-sac street to the existing water main in Blackhawk Hills Road. 6. This development shall be responsible for providing adequate easements for the storm sewer outlet into Blackhawk Lake. 7. This development shall also be responsible for constructing the required outlet into Blackhawk Lake. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined .in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. • 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way And temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadwayrp as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development 'shall dedicate adequate drainage and ,ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements.. C. Plans and Specifications JL_ All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer. in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control ,plan. must be prepared in -accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval.. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released21. until one year after the date of�'ns-t.aj llation. (OVER) STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Im rovements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. n : Advisory Planning Commission Approved: August 25, 1987 Revised: STANDARD I� LTS#2 • i City Council &UMNOWMWOMP-4 s ZONING -4 LAND USE MAP 0 i= �s ie ie i PQpPOaI.O ��LKMNy1t Q10 �L • 0 if E F -is BLACKHAWK GLEN ARD ADDITION"GAN•MN.u aJames R. Hill inc. PRELIMINARYPLAT / '°" PLANNERS /ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS SIENNA CORPORATION � .n. n.n° °n. ]wi( .e. ° •.°ll],uN. fltl. ..,.(;e MO.U.X4.0rafS •oiLoomNcxN.Lw!YL • sTs9b]on BLACKHAWK GLEN 311D ADDITIONJames R. I IIII, inc.�: r p n e e: i {AOAN. YM. ..:::• o PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN ^? ^:: i::. So.- PLANNERS / ENGINEERS'/ SURVEYORS SIENNA CORPORATION 5 0�1•—..4 e., SUITE 434 Yxxl.•OLIf,YM. fffff 'F <.aYl...�•�•' 82WK%%= PA S. BLCCW4TCK M 7543.612.064•3" M 0 p BLACKHAWK GLEN 3RD ADDITIO 'PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN James R. Hill, inc. PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS SIENNA CORPORATION jigif p BLACKHAWK GLEN 3RD ADDITIO 'PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN James R. Hill, inc. PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS SIENNA CORPORATION n a f PfL0�06 'LO d.I PCMAa�ffC QtOCL n gai a/ Ertl a It 1 h h N i r yS� I e r- tr. D Y:e: log' t [ t x 0,o 8�E • 10 D �c ar- o r f PfL0�06 'LO d.I PCMAa�ffC QtOCL 19 E 0 o BLACKHAWK AGAGLEN 3RD ADDITJON - James R. Hill, inc. " o PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 PLANNERS /ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS oo �J / •.. SIENNA CORPORATION/ x.f .r Ot�f.rN. ffff / ��a.,•�a. ...�r e7oO &WwrGtW.lN 5541 .62.BN.]029 RUPa gai Ertl It 1 h 4 r- tr. D (10 to u -{ w + 0,o oVs • 19 E 0 o BLACKHAWK AGAGLEN 3RD ADDITJON - James R. Hill, inc. " o PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 PLANNERS /ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS oo �J / •.. SIENNA CORPORATION/ x.f .r Ot�f.rN. ffff / ��a.,•�a. ...�r e7oO &WwrGtW.lN 5541 .62.BN.]029 '-.TA.qKENOFk V,, ADDITION A PILOT K f 3d if CENTE BLACKHAWK GLEN 3rd SUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan SANITARY SEWER PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN EPARTMENT cl FI G. -* A - approved: standard I plate #: MEMORANDUM TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: OCTOBER 16, 1987 SUBJECT: BLACKHAWK GLEN - 3RD ADDITION - ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION RECREATION At the October 1, 1987 Advisory Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed the proposed Blackhawk Glen - 3rd Addition. Present were the developer, Mr. Rick Packer, Sienna Corporation. Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat, and have made a recommendation to the City Council as follows: 1. The City acquire Outlot B for parkland dedication, with the remaining dedication requirement to be made up in cash. 2. The developer provide a conservation easement over the lots along the abutting Blackhawk Park, as determined adequate by staff. 3. The developer provide a temporary trail easement within the southwest portion of the par -cel, to provide for adequate area for trail construction as determined by City staff. This temporary easement shall last for a period of five years, and be replaced by a permanent easement once the trail is constructed. 4. The developer grade the proposed trail along the pedestrian access according to the parks and recreation design and standards. This area is adjacent to the proposed development to the east. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of a proposed conservation easement, as recommended by the Advisory Commission. KV/bls cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide �3 CONSERVATION EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is made this day of 1987, by the undersigned parties, being all the owners in fee and all the encumbrancers of the premises hereinafter described ("Grantors"), and the , a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"). The Grantors, for good and valuable consideration paid by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acr-Inowledged, grant the City a permanent conservation easement, as that term is defined in this instrument, over, under and across the premises described in the attached Exhibit "A" ("Subject Property") . 1. Grantors, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, agree that the following are prohibited in perpetuity on the Subject Property: A. Constructing, installing, storing or maintaining anything made by man, including but not limited to buildings, structures, fences, walkways, clothes line poles, and playground equipment. B. Parking of recreational vehicles. C. Vegetable gardens. D. Storage of firewood. E. Removal of or damage to any plants planted by the C, a -r 2. The Grantors, their heirs, successors and assigns, may establish ar.d maintain a lawn in the conservation easement area, as well &s other plant material which is approved in advance in writing by the 3. Grantors, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, further grant the City the affirmative right, but not the obligation, to do the following on the Subject Property: A. Preserve, improve and enhance the slope, trees, vegetation, and natural habitat. 0-4 B. Alter, Blear and remove trees or other vegetation. C. Plant trees and shrubs. D. After giving the owner or occupant reasonable notice, enter upon the Subject Property at any time to enforce compliance with the terms of this instrument. 4. This Easement is supplementary to the platted drainage and utility easement and does not supercede or replace it. GRANTORS: �ti APC Minutes September 22, 1987 BLACKHAWK GLEN 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The second public hearing of the evening was in regard to the application of Sienna Corporation for a preliminary plat consisting of 33 lots on approximately 25.8 acres, located in the southwest quarter of Section 16, south of Blackhawk Hills Road and abutting Blackhawk Lake to the south. Mr. Runkle introduced the development and its location relative to other developments in the area. Mr. Rick Packer was present on behalf of the applicant and asked to be considered by the City Council at its October 6 meeting, so that it might better match up with the Meritor Development to the east for the purposes of simultaneous grading. Mr. John Johnson, 1610 Blackhawk Hills Road expressed concern in regard to his view of the back yards in the new development. It was indicated that the lots in question were 300 feet deep and a lower elevation than Mr. Johnson's lot. There were several questions in regard to the necessity to a DNR permit and ability of a homeowner's association to maintain a sealed pond with only one outlet to -Blackhawk Lake. Mr. Packer indicated that a well will be drilled with the responsibility for the operation thereof to belong to a homeowner's association. It was suggested by member McCrea that the developer consider the ability to maintain the pond without it becoming too "green". It was indicated that Outlots A and B were to be dedicated as park land. Member Wilkins questioned the likelihood of success of a homeowners association in a single-family development, whose only responsibility is to maintain a pond. It was stated that a half cul-de-sac on the westerly portion of the plat was present for turn -around on a dead-end road. However, the new lots would not access on this cul-de-sac, nor was a cul-de-sac ever constructed. McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. A copy of the Homeowners Association shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review. 3. There shall be no driveway access into Blackhawk Hills Road. 4. Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 1, shall have their driveways connect to the internal street, not Blackhawk Point. 5. The development shall be responsible for completing the water main loop from the easterly adjacent cul-de-sac street to the existing water main in Blackhawk Hills Road. APC Minutes September 22, 1987 6. This development shall be responsible for providing adequate easements for the storm sewer outlet into Blackhawk Lake. 7. This development shall also be responsible for constructing the required outlet into Blackhawk Lake. 8. Houses having elevations below 860 feet will be required to have individual water -pressure reducing valves. 9. The developer shall be the pond storm system. All voted yes. required to obtain a DNR permit for ENGSTROM'S DEERWOOD ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing convened by Chairman Hall was in regard to the application of Robert Engstrom Associates requesting a rezoning of 39.75 acres of A (Agricultural) to a Mixed Use Planned Development district containing 83 single family lots and an Outlot for an estimated 22 townhouse units located along the southwest intersection of Deerwood Drive and Pilot Knob Road. Mr. Runkle advised that the January 1987 Land Use Map designated the area as D -II (0-6 units/acre). The first addition (37.35 acres) would be the single family area with the townhouse area being included as an Outlot (2.4 acres) for future development. Mr. Runkle described the circular street configuration and single access on Deerwood Drive. Member Wilkins noted that condition 6 required additional accesses to public streets which were not provided in the applicant's proposal. Member McCrea noted that staff had also stated that grading and drainage were insufficient. City Planner Runkle also suggested that there were many complications with this particular parcel of land and that the issues might be addressed to allow the applicant to receive direction from the Advisory Planning Commission. Wilkins moved, McCrea seconded the motion to continue the application for 30 days. Member Voracek indicated some agreement with the staff, but noted that a public hearing had been set and that a condition such as condition 6, may be struck by the Advisory Planning Commission. The motion died with one affirmative vote. City Planner Runkle then described the severe constraints on the property represented by the Williams Brothers pipeline and several City utility lines within the parcel. He noted that the development could be much denser if not for these easements. �a7 Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/ENGSTROM'S DEERWOOD ADDITION C. Rezoning, Robert Engstrom Companies, Engstrom's Deerwood Addition A to a PD and Preliminary Plat Entitled Engstrom's Deerwood Addition --A public hearing was held by the APC on September 22, 1987, to consider an application submitted by Robert Engstrom Associates to rezone 39.75 A (Agriculture) acres to a mixed use Planned Development containing 83 single family lots and 22 townhouse units and a preliminary plat entitled Engstrom's Deerwood Addition. The APC is recommending approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For a copy of the Planningand Engineering Departments report, refer to pages � through q, For a copy of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission action, refer to page �- C For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to page(s),/-S—V7 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from 39.7 A (Agriculture) acres to a mixed use Planned Development district containing single family and townhouse units and a preliminary plat entitled Engstrom's Deerwood Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING PRELIMINARY PLAT ENGSTROM'S DEERWOOD ADDITION APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOCIATES LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 21 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 39.75 AG (Agricultural) acres to a Mixed Use Planned Development District containing 83 single family lots and 22 townhouse units located along the southwest intersection of Deerwood Drive and Pilot Knob Road. The January 1987 Land Use Map designates this area D -II (0-6 units/acre). This proposal is consistent with that plan. The first addition (37.35 acres) will be the single family area with the townhouse area being included as an Outlot (2.4 acres) for future development. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently, the site is mostly open grassland with scattered mature trees along the north, south and eastern property lines. Because of that, the site appears somewhat sheltered from Pilot Knob Road. None of these tree'd areas will be disturbed and in areas where the tree line breaks, additional landscaping will be planted for screening and visual consistency. The developer has expressed concern over the possible unnecessary loss of trees with the Pilot Knob Road improvements. They propose the use of retaining walls or that maintenance free side slopes be planted as opposed to quick clearing of the R.O.W. wherever there is any chance of saving these trees. The pond along Pilot Knob Road will be a backyard amenity to seven adjacent lots. The 100' wide Williams Bros. Pipeline Easement bisects the property in a northeasterly manner at the northwest portion -of the site. The site has existing storm sewer and sanitary sewer easements running through it at 902 angles, making site planning with any regard to the existing topography difficult. This proposal is sensitive to these problems as well as the natural state of the land. The Knob Hill P.D. abutts to the south with R-3 and NB uses, the school to the west, AG and PD residential property to the north and the Hidden Valley Addition/St. John Neumann church on the east side of Pilot Knob Road. N SITE PLAN: A divided landscaped entry from Deerwood Drive serves the single family portion of this development forming a large looping street with 3 cul-de-sacs. The center cul-de-sac is in excess of 500' but would serve 11 lots at the most. The design goal of the plat is to create a 'strong' neighborhood feeling similar to the Chatterton Ponds Addition by the same developer. A 25' walkway easement for the school property will eliminate the need for children to walk along Deerwood Drive in the winter months when the trails are not cleared. The 83 lots on 37.35 acres give the single family area a gross density of 2.2 units/acre. The proposed 22 townhouses would have 9.2 units/acre and the entire P.D. would have 2.6 units/acre. The minimum lot width proposed for the single family area is 751. There are some stovepipe shaped lots in the southwest portion of the plat that are narrower at the 30' setback line, however there are easements that would prohibit building construction in that location so the homes need to be set back further into the lot. This was also done at Chatterton Ponds. The lots vary in size from 12,000 s.f. to 28,800 s.f. The developer will maintain architectural control of this subdivision. This project with 2 or 3 proposed builders would be graded as soon as possible in an effort to have streets and utilities in prior to the Pilot Knob Road improvements. The anticipated home price would range between $120,000 - $175,000. The additional landscaping being proposed is unique for a single family proposal in Eagan. Aside from the cul-de-sac islands and entryways, the developer will be adding front yard trees on every lot in groupings that will create a more natural setting as opposed to a single tree per front yard. Of the plant material listed, staff recommends the use of native materials as often as possible so the area retains as much of the original character as possible. All of the backyards in the loop area also have mass plantings that will help create privacy as well as maintenance free slopes on the rear property lines. All sizes meet or exceed City requirements in commercial districts. J1;D GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed preliminary grading plan is incomplete and 'does not adequately define the proposed grading and drainage areas. The proposed grading plan is deficient in the following areas: * The future proposed Pilot Knob Road elevations were not incorporated into the grading plan. * The existing contours for the upgraded Deerwood Drive were not incorporated into the grading plan. * The proposed grading along the northerly edge of Pond BP -27 is not defined in the grading plan. * Back yard and side lot line drainage swales were not defined. The proposed cut section along the Deerwood School Addition exceeds the maximum 3:1 allowable slope criteria. However, since the preparation of a proposed grading plan, the developer has been in contact with the Deerwood School and has stated that a slope easement from the school could be acquired thus eliminating the slope area which exceeds the maximum allowable 3:1 slope criteria. The most centrally located cul-de-sac in Block 2 needs to be raised to provide positive storm water drainage. The cul-de-sac as proposed will create a land locked low drainage basin. In summary, the developer must submit a revised grading plan. The development proposes to direct its storm water runoff directly into Pond JP -3 and directly into the existing trunk storm sewer which flows through the site north. Further analysis of the proposed storm sewer system cannot be performed until a new grading plan meeting the City's criteria is submitted. An incomplete preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan was submitted as a part of this application. The erosion and sediment control plan should follow the submittal requirements for a grading permit and general criteria as provided by the City of Eagan. The major erosion and sediment control issues for this site include the benching of all lots, directing surface drainage on individual lots back into the hill rather than down the hill from lot to lot, seeding and mulching after rough grading and utility installation and erosion and sediment control on individual lots during the home building phase. UTILITIIES: Water supply of sufficient capacity exists in Deerwood Drive and along Pilot Knob Road. The development proposes to adequately loop the lateral water main system through the development. Trunk sanitary sewer of sufficient size and depth presently exists throughout the proposed site. This development shall be responsible for any damages or modifications to the existing trunk storm and sanitary sewer system which may result from any grading or construction activities. c7 STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed site is taken from Deerwood Drive in one location. No access is proposed to be taken from Pilot Knob Road. The entrance location along Deerwood Drive is such that maximum site distances are obtained. Internal circulation is provided with a central loop street including three cul-de-sacs. The pedestrian walkway is provided in the southwest corner of the proposed site to the westerly adjacent school addition. The development shall be required to make the necessary connections to the southerly adjacent property and to Pilot Knob opposite the entrance to Chatterton Ponds. The proposed entrance island shall be removed in the final plat and construction plans. Street access to the southerly adjacent property (Knob Hill of Eagan) is not proposed. In the approved preliminary plat for Knob Hill of Eagan, Knob Lane is extended northerly from Diffley Road to the westerly boundary of the preliminary plat. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development shall be responsible for providing the required right-of-way and slope easements for Pilot Knob Road as required by the Dakota County Highway Department. The development shall also be responsible for providing right-of-way widths for proposed Deerwood Trail and the three cul-de-sac streets which take access from Deerwood Trail in accordance with City of Eagan requirements for street construction. All regulatory agency permits shall be required in a timely manner as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed development has been previously assessed for sanitary sewer trunk, water area, storm sewer trunk, the water lateral benefit (Deerwood Drive) and street (Deerwood Drive) at the single family rate. The following assessments are pending under Project 466, Pilot Knob Road street and storm sewer improvements: Description Rate Quantity Amount Street $17.72/FF 1,022.07 FF $18,111 Storm Sewer .12/SF 16,000 FF 1,920 Total Pending Assessment $20,031 The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval: Project # Description Rate Quantity Amount 24-A Water Lat. Benefit (Pilot Knob Road) $12.47/FF 1,317.04 FF $16,423 88 Sewer Lateral Benefit 30.12/LF 2,604 LF 78,432 257 Storm Sewer Lat. Benefit 20.78/LF 1,416 LF 29,424 Total Proposed Assessment 3_Z_ $124,279 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. It should be noted that Outlot A has an underlying use proposed as future multi -residential. Additional assessments will be required if and when Outlot A is developed to its future proposed use. CONDITIONS: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The cul-de-sac in excess of 500' shall be permitted. . 3. That development shall submit a grading and drainage plan acceptable to staff which addresses but is not limited to the issues outlined in the staff report. 4. The development shall assume full responsibility for all damages which may result and/or any reconstruction of the existing trunk facilities which may be necessitated by the grading and construction activities of the proposed development. 5. The proposed entrance island must be removed from the final plat and construction plans. 6. The development shall be required to provide access to the southerly adjacent property, access to Pilot Knob opposite the Chatterton Ponds entrance, coordinate the north entrance with the property owner north of Deerwood Drive, and connect the centrally proposed cul-de-sac with the proposed outer loop street. 33 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined .in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadway$ as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development 'shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. ` All public streets and utilities necessary to provide ..service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer. in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control .plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval.. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. (OVER) I l STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. + u Advisory Planning Commission Approved: August 25, 1987 Revised: STANDARD �� LTS#2 City Council September 15, 1987 Y SITE LAND USE MAP DEERWOOD ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES 4MO 621 -77-777 4 ---- --------- -Z ".6 z 1 1° 1,/ PRELIMINARY PLAT 0 50 100 FEET DEERWOOD PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER ROBERT ENGSTROM AND WATERMAIN PLAN e -A 17..j-7 UCOMPANIES 0 50 100 FEET 3 DEERWOOD PREL. GRADING, STORM SEWER .... . ....... ...... ....... .. ROBERT ENGSTROM AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN H�x COMPANIES J9 Z' ��/ 0 50 100 FEET !' 1 i 11 12 71 1 " 5 8 86.0'�' n 895 , A 40" BP -3 r,� '._Ata:)ALi� • .' , /;B P_ 9052 . 35 .---..—_�....----....----I v ; 908.0 A -P / n 920.2 B �'j I P-25 � ' v`v/ 924.0 Li I I %�/ • i! B -s j!2 927.2 s i J r 42.J_ C. S A H, q 12. —BP_24i' P-28......__.. 910,0 9 18J . 931.3--�...._.._�......R BP=9. "r, '932.3..%. 91.9 909.81 Bnq•,r, - . r 916,Q r`;2 \� 487A;'71' JP - 818.99 LS 1P -36 8 70.6 97JP-35� JP- 7. , 3,�N, 869.4 ° r859:4''•7C, 872.4 865.2 ................ SUBJECT PARCEL DEERWOOD ADDITION of 855:0.:•., a ;'e �U.: :858:0 FIG. -#1 city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: piste #d ED �PUBLICWORKS D DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN JP - 818.99 LS 1P -36 8 70.6 97JP-35� JP- 7. , 3,�N, 869.4 ° r859:4''•7C, 872.4 865.2 ................ SUBJECT PARCEL DEERWOOD ADDITION of 855:0.:•., a ;'e �U.: :858:0 FIG. -#1 city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: piste #d ED �PUBLICWORKS D DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN L - BLACKti. 'K e 31LACKHA'AiK PARK 36 11 , HALL 311 . ... ... C -I: 7- C - E-/. C. - G L C—K -3 130: Ef � T3 C' T I Z. i45 27, lj jj T hiO d HALL 311 . ... ... C -I: 7- city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME C 10 1 C—H I Coto 10 _7 NO. 2 C Lm L= 15 11-12 2 'G. L C—K 130: � T3 C' T 27, lj jj T hiO d 1 HFIGHTP iAZ L' city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME C 10 1 C—H I Coto 10 _7 NO. 2 C Lm L= 15 11-12 2 'G. DEERWOOD ADDITION SUBJECT PARCEL SANITARY MASTER SEWER PLAN FIG. +1e- approved: standard I plate #: L . . . ....... C' T LI -4 DEERWOOD ADDITION SUBJECT PARCEL SANITARY MASTER SEWER PLAN FIG. +1e- approved: standard I plate #: LACK H; ...... T71 I .......... 111.1 12-2 76.0 HILLS 78.7/96.0 CITY 4.0 HALL .!I . . . . ......... % 17.0 j� 13 LACK HAvVi PARK K 000 OPP- 51.7/67.0 81 ! wm- AN 0 1819 r54/67. . ........... .. 2 ....... M G 1411 GROUND STORAGE 124 44.6 /5 9.0 H.W-L, 1059 ............. rd- .............. .............. .............. E .............. >1020 1,61 38.3/94.0 125 .............. .............. .......... 21.8/31.0 do* 16 88.5/ 82-8/94 0 -A 100.0 !'j, j -q,, I 11611 �/ i I �, fj 9�.4/107.0 6" /lob/ 5.0 165i A H 6 1 51 12" re .E AD A DEERWOOD /ADDITION SUBJECT PARCEL .................. I FIG. *3 city of eagan approved:- standard WATER plate PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN co DEPARTMENT �, vnrs+r sada ,-+rear � .. .{ .�::� r.. ./' /-��- _-`\\ -...i •: :�:� \ \ ��� �.4'. .. ..._ %! I Itt i •�— K ..� I' '1.'`'`-ri''42:`-.CW.-.._. r a / `s :.e :.t.�..�.��..,:_. •_s...ka •� 1\v .. � A=' liwwwrw.'w~w!!!!`lwiww� \\ e��' `°' iN .` � _��•? '``� •�. �� f ' // � 9 fit" .\ J• ~\••:~ i �,� �.a 17 zz iL is to kt lCl r lr .r• •p �c. - •' \\ �� � )amu )` •��'� .0 % ;N � o � �l: O - �• `�' - :�' --- .•, ,� �� � vim_ _ :,, .� ._ s' j^.!X K /' ,/ w 1 �•A l � � _ � � ��o ^ .z�.a _ ,� �' ' � y 1'e+�� � ;1' I I' 1 - ,i• / r _ '^• I -P _ /I• a'"�� _'_' .:o �'.�C, '�� _�.• - C .9. _ I1 ;L Ij —V7 Rao? NO 3l P.r�07Rd9O i _ •-�-��.Y 13:70.1 — SANITARY SEWER LATERAL BENEFIT 2604 L.F. '666/66008 STORM SEWER LATERAL BENEFIT 1416 L.F. s ® m w ■ PILOT KNOB ROAD 900F.F. ------- WATER LATERAL BENEFIT 1317.04 F.F. 43 MEMORANDUM �!TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR -,1 ROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: OCTOBER 12, 1987 SUBJECT: ADVISORY COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION - ENGSTROMS - DEERWOOD ADDITION On Thursday, October 1, 1987, at the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission meeting, the Advisory Commission reviewed the Engstrom's Deerwood Addition, and made the following recommendation to the City Council: 1. That this plat be subject to a cash dedication. 2. For a trailway on Pilot Knob Road. 3. A trail connection to the Deerwood Elementary School site from the residential development. KV/bls cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide 44 APC Minutes September 22, 1987 6. This development shall be responsible for providing adequate easements for the storm sewer outlet into Blackhawk Lake. 7. This development shall also be responsible for constructing the required outlet into Blackhawk Lake. 8. Houses having elevations below 860 feet will be required to have individual water -pressure reducing valves. 9. The developer shall be required to obtain a DNR permit for the pond storm system. All voted yes. ENGSTROM'S DEERWOOD ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing convened by Chairman Hall was in regard to the application of Robert Engstrom Associates requesting a rezoning of 39.75 acres of A (Agricultural) to a Mixed Use Planned Development district containing 83 single family lots and an Outlot for an estimated 22 townhouse units located along the southwest intersection of Deerwood Drive and Pilot Knob Road. Mr. Runkle advised that the January 1987 Land Use Map designated the area as D -II (0-6 units/acre). The first addition (37.35 acres) would be the single family area with the townhouse area being included as an Outlot (2.4 acres) for future development. Mr. Runkle described the circular street configuration and single access on Deerwood Drive. Member Wilkins noted that condition 6 required additional accesses to public streets which were not provided in the applicant's proposal. Member McCrea noted that staff had also stated that grading and drainage were insufficient. City Planner Runkle also suggested that there were many complications with this particular parcel of land and that the issues might be addressed to allow the applicant to receive direction from the Advisory Planning Commission. Wilkins moved, McCrea seconded the motion to continue the application for 30 days. Member Voracek indicated some agreement with the staff, but noted that a public hearing had been set and that a condition such as condition 6, may be struck by the Advisory Planning Commission. The motion died with one affirmative vote. City Planner Runkle then described the severe constraints on the property represented by the Williams Brothers pipeline and several City utility lines within the parcel. He noted that the development could be much denser if not for these easements. 9 45 APC Minutes September 22, 1987 Mr. Bob Engstrom indicated that Dakota County did not or would not allow another access onto Pilot Knob Road. He also advised that the traffic pattern for the Knob Hill development to the south was designed to proceed westerly. He stated that the access provided to the north on Deerwood Drive was in compliance with any future development of the Bryant property to the north. Pair. Jack Buxell also appeared and described the plan, indicating that it was a neighborhood concept. He also suggested that the trunk utility lines running through the property, severely hampered the development of it. He stated that the double entrance with an island on Deerwood Drive would insure emergency access and that the plat had been carefully designed to avoid conflict with manholes and trunk utility lines. Mr. Engstrom argued that the divided entrance had been successful in other developments, including the Birnamwood townhome development in Burnsville. He advised that it was their hope to provide model homes by January or February. In response to questions by member Voracek, Mr. Foertsch indicated that the double entrance was a nuisance for City maintenance equipment. It was noted that the Birnamwood example was a private entrance and privately maintained. Mr. Foertsch also addressed the public safety issue in regard to other accesses and then indicated that County guidelines did not permit an additional access on Pilot Knob, across from Chatterton Ponds, but that it may consider such an access which had not been previously proposed. In response to Mr. Voracek's questions, he did suggest that one additional access would be adequate for public safety purposes. In response to questions in regard to the number of lots not being 8.5 feet in width at the setback, it was noted that most of the narrower lots would involve homes that were set back much farther, due to the existing utility lines. Mr. Engstrom also noted that a berm was anticipated along Pilot Knob in order to reduce noise to the neighborhood. Member McCrea noted that the developer's limitations on density should be tied into the Development Contract, and that future owners should be notified of the Williams Brothers pipeline location. She also suggested that the center islands owned by the homeowner's association would be tied to the individual lots for assessment purposes, should islands have to be maintained by the City. It was noted that while the idea of a small neighborhood was received favorably by the Planning Commission, public safety concerns for access also had to be addressed. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion -to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: V4� APC Minutes September 22, 1987 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet shall be permitted. 3. That development shall submit a grading and drainage plan acceptable to staff which addresses but is not limited to the issues outlined in the staff report. 4. The development shall assume full responsibility for all damages which may result and/or any reconstruction of the existing trunk facilities which may be necessitated by the grading and construction activities of the proposed development. 5. Future homeowners of this development shall be advised of the Williams Brothers pipeline. 6. The Development Agreement & Planned Development Agreement shall clearly indicate a density and number of units to be as requested by the developer. All voted in favor except Wilkins and Voracek who voted no. Gustafson moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning to the Planned Development of 5 years, which would have zoning that would revert to A (Agricultural) upon termination of the development contract or failure to comply with the agreement. It was also noted that the Homeowners Declarations should provide that the cost of the improvement by the City, if it becomes necessary, would be assessable to the homeowners. All voted yes. The developer requested an October 6, 1987 City Council review. The Commission suggested this be left up to staff. DORCHESTER OF EAGAN - PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Keller Investment Company for a preliminary plat for 320 apartment units on 37.5 acres within the Eagan 40 Planned Development, located south of County Road #30 and west of Thomas Lake Road in the northwest quarter of Section 28. City Planner Runkle noted that an EAW was completed in 1986 and received a negative declaration. In 1975, the Planned Unit Development provided for 338 units. In May 'of 1986, a PUD was extended for a 3 year period and the Deerfield Addition was approved for 322 apartment units, consisting of nine 36 unit building as opposed to four 80 unit buildings presently proposed. A neighborhood meeting had been held but staff had not been present. Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 PRELIMINARY PLAT/DORCHESTER OF EAGAN ADDITION D. Preliminary Plat, Keller Investment Company for the Dorchester of Eagan Addition for 320 Apartment Units --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on September 22, 1987, to consider a preliminary plat entitled Dorchester of Eagan Addition consisting of 320 rental apartment units on the Eagan 40 Planned Development site. The APC is recommending approval. For a copy the Planning and Engineering Departments report, refer to pages through -2a . For action that was taken by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, refer to page 7 3 . For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to page(s)7q l.(e_ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a preliminary plat entitled Dorchester of Eagan Addition for 320 apartment units on 37.5 acres within the Eagan 40 Planned Development. SPECIAL NOTE: On Friday, October 16, a letter was received from Mr. Robert A. Keller of Keller Investment Company withdrawing this application. Because they have requested withdrawing rather than continuance, no action is required on this item. Therefore, any further consideration of the Dorchester of Eagan Addition will require a new application to the Planning Commission for preliminary plat. qf CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (DORCHESTER OF EAGAN) APPLICANT: KELLER INVESTMENT CO. LOCATION: NW 1/4 SECTION 28 EXISTING ZONING: P.D. (EAGAN 40) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Dorchester of Eagan Addition consisting of 320 rental apartment units on the Eagan 40 Planned Development site south of County Road 30 and west of Thomas Lake Road. The January 1987 Land Use Map designates this area D-1 (0-3 units/acre); however, the P.D. zoning supercedes the Land Use Plan. An EAW that received a negative declaration was completed in 1986 for this site and the previously approved Deerfield Addition. The Eagan 40 Planned Development, containing 39.6 acres and 338 total units, was approved in 1975 for a ten-year period. In May of 1986, action was taken to extend the P.D. agreement for a three-year period. At that time, the Deerfield Addition was also approved for 322 apartment units on the west side of Thomas Lake Road and the 2.2 acres on the east side were to have no more than 16 housing units. A proposed road extension (Sandi Drive) connecting Thomas Lake Road westerly to Johnny Cake Ridge Road is consistent with the original P.D. concept plan. SITE CONTEXT: This site is -surrounded by the Boulder Ridge townhouse proposal and quad homes to the east, quad homes to the south, and undeveloped RB and R-4 land to the south. The topography is primarily rolling grassland that generally flows toward a ponding area near the center of the site. A deep ravine that enters that area from the west is wooded, as is the area along the southeast property line. Other immature tree stands are found scattered throughout the site. SITE PLAN: There would be four 80 -unit buildings, with two on each side of the east/west street as opposed to the nine 36 -unit buildings in the Deerfield proposal. The southeast portion of the site would remain an undisturbed open meadow. The buildings closest to Diffley Road would have a divided landscaped entry with a large retaining wall along the western property line. These buildings, similar in length to the LeMay Lake Apartments, would be constructed first, with the southerly buildings following in a second phase. The roof pitch of the buildings was reduced to lessen the height and potential impact on the Thomas Lake Heights Addition. Staff requested that the landscape architects provide sections to show W1 this relationship. The proposed landscape plan attempts to enhance the existing vegetation and recreate the natural conditions as often as possible. Oversized evergreens are being proposed in an effort to reduce the immediate impact. Staff also recommends planting all areas in the second phase (that would not be disturbed) with the first phase planting. All of the buildings will be on Lot 1, Block 1 or Lot 1, Block 2. Therefore, staff recommends that Lot 2, Block 2 be incorporated into Lot 1, Block 2 on the south side of the east/west road. The apartment area density is 8.5 units/acre and all setbacks meet Code requirements. The buildings themselves would be gray with white trim like the Royal Oaks Apartments. Two tennis courts and a recreation building are proposed with the first phase. There will be one parking stall included with the rent and one exterior stall meeting City requirements. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed site has elevation differentials ranging from a high point of approximately 984 in the southwest corner of this site to a low point elevation of 897. Extensive grading is required to accomplish the proposed finished floor elevations of 950 and 962 in the northerly and southerly buildings respectively. Cuts and fills in excess of 20 feet are required to accomplish the proposed building pad elevations. The development is proposing to provide on site ponding to handle the storm water runoff generated by the development. The area below the 910 elevation is required to adequately handle the storm water runoff generated by this site. The outflow from this ponding area will be limited to one (1) CFS. The area below and including the 910 elevation should be preserved in an easement to protect the proposed ponding area. Outlets to the ponding area should be extended to the NWL. UTILITIES: Water service of sufficient capacity to serve the development is readily available from the existing 12" trunk mains located in Diffley Road and Thomas Lake Road. The development proposes to adequately loop the proposed lateral systems throughout the site and provide the necessary stub to the westerly adjacent property. The development proposes to extend southeasterly and tie into the existing in the Thomas Lake Heights 2nd Addition. �s� sanitary sewer laterals sanitary sewer stub provided STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development proposes to take street access from Diffley Road on the north and Thomas Lake Road on the east. Dakota County has committed to allowing one opening along Diffley Road. The development is proposing to construct a private street from Diffley Road to the proposed east -west -public street which connects Thomas Lake Road with the westerly boundary of the proposed site. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Dakota County requires a 60' half right-of-way restrictive access, except for one location near the west end of the property, along Diffley Road. The development will be responsible for dedicating a 60' right-of-way for the proposed public street which connects Thomas Lake Road to the westerly boundary of the proposed site. Easements in accordance with City of Eagan standards will be required for all storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water mains. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed Dorchester of Eagan site has previously been asessed for sanitary sewer trunk, water area, street for Thomas Lake Road, water lateral benefit and storm sewer along Thomas Lake Road. There are no pending assessments against the proposed site and the following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval: Project # Description Rate Quantity 257 Storm Sewer Trunk -$.067/SF 1,422,347 SF 2 Trailway 12.40/FF 1,639.98 FF 237 Water Lateral Benefit 20.58/FF 902.40 FF 237 Water Lat. Ben. Upgrade 8.08/FF 584.58 FF County Road 30 76.92/FF 977.40 FF Outlot A Assessment Approved by City Council and Special Assessment Committee Total Proposed Assessment Amount $95,297 20,299 18,544 4,723 75,182 35,000 $249,045 The final assessment amount will be determined using rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval and based on final plat dimensions and areas. S( CONDITIONS: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The garage shall be included in the rental unit price if only two stalls per unit are provided with this project. 3. Lot 2, Block 2 shall be incorporated into Lot 1, Block 2 on the final plat. 4. Perimeter landscaping in undisturbed areas of the second phase shall be installed with the first phase. 5. All public utilities and streets necessary to serve this development shall be petitioned for by the developer and ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Wa 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way And temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadway$ as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan.must be prepared inaccordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval.. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. (OVER) S 3 e- • ff , STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Im rovements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission Approved: August 25, 1987 Revised: STANDARD C LTSn2 - City Council September 15, 1987 SITE ZONING 1980 LAND USE W 1987 LAND USE MAP., -- 'THp!'1Al L4rC%E Wr3 / q I C JD h % H -- 494.34 -- C d Z c pp v u u to ➢ r � O D y P 1 N v 17 F , i r t n d V c' a s c Ry 0 d a4 as v � a p J f dop j oo 1 0 - - 448 89 -- 10 - r: r 74 I r 0 � a r 0 r x -- e.58.aa-- -r K O M A3 Lj%.W.Vx Wr 5 � o � S i oto �•i.56 i I d //00 tio\ 1 4 / N - d •• 494 i6 Go A I I i d c ap o In Pp 4 f rF r P = p F r a ar F R s a 4 1 s t 1ri a O N A d 1 F h o j N 910.:10619 P y pP iy� +a CP so tj �F o 4y r r ao N F A h 0 4 �C i •�1 Q� v v Y 4 00 F C S P F 4 F r 1 0 t 4 Cs 10 0 I' 1 r o r: r 74 I r 0 � a r 0 r x -- e.58.aa-- -r K O M A3 Lj%.W.Vx Wr 5 � o � S i oto �•i.56 i I d //00 tio\ 1 4 / N - d •• 494 i6 Go A I I i d c ap o In Pp 4 f rF r P = p F r a ar F R s a 4 1 s t 1ri a O N A d 1 F h o j N 910.:10619 P y pP iy� +a CP so tj �F o 4y r r ao N F A h 0 4 �C i •�1 Q� v v Y 4 00 F C S P F 4 F r 1 �_•�_-__- -_ .___.-`___ ,._.' .�C.__`-- _--------- _ - '. 41-•+. -Jl •\_�1 t...--ter- _ 1�-" ----------- __------ -- �• i -� � -_-'•_•--sir.-...-- /'- _1: �l•� __ ,i _. 1 I I 1 ,\ 1 rj IM I - �'1 iii--- - --� r_ —= --ter _ .� �.v� _ »Li '_ "�:�.:a':�-.-.«''.' - _ •_r_-�. �� a- w .. _ �_1! 1 %,� _ ---- _-- __ - ---__ ' � ,� ---= -' "mss:' ;' "� -:•�: _ . �. . •,;' M ti ,.1 \� �'! I 'i_ - .`•...1'''i. '•%• 'eta`'-.: 1 j-;� t 1 1v -i-- _ - IIS 4,' _ __ P\ '.•-,! -1.% _- '� • \• ut le ZE/ I ,� .�� •}il �111_I� �J �l'}_ -�� -�' - ,1'1\' •/' '!•moi• ;=. - - -'- •�',,\•�;�;�'\ \, ";,�! _ ,� �; . :•�-� - `" \,-- .i �' ;:. � _ _dam; rte, ,,( \` . •,,•. •��1r tnf i , •1, /', �� _ �( ��-9,�1 � I � r€I' i I , _ _:... �\ t ` mss'-------_•%� i� �• '+� _ - _ ! �� , (/• l �'- � i /�'� ��� ��� % :i � -��.� `-��- ' � r . � � `ire-••,,,` , .�. Ma , � l .. ''� /�' -••. j' � iI i ,'tea. ",� "" •- _ /• _. - '- I t ' � \,. --- - � 1 .-,� �! _ •-''-. -. -i I '1 �- --' !' //j f!�%.:�.r: ,..= _-_, _--__1,��``r 1 '�'' f'w `• - /1 ri�� 11` ___' .' _-_-_ '- 1•�\`�.:; :$•'�;:� ^i �J ttt Nwtnm, anus ------------- --------- ------- i=__=a-'=_= _' "-_ _ -- r_=c r--_._..� `- ----- e Oil ------------ ., .tom - -.�dE .a � �� ,�';:.::•, , ,:� r '� "n '�j}� f�{{ 1 '�,�,lill/��I 'r�'r�l�,.•'ii�tT �� �_ J �••'.- \\1� F .;'��,,,1. ' .Ill _ / �b� � -�• � - f �: � 1 i p Y//ff// } - `' i 1 it l l � 1 •;t s i .� f - ta' ��F j i I i ♦� ..fit / ---------- Ow - ow 1 / - 1 I .r; ♦ .nm .citkiarp;7A 'Z ••— .pIAN ------ ---- --- -- ice_ -r--- =: i `" ��✓_- ------ --------------- --------------- .`C`4 Z z _-------� -- ----- r IX . .` - %,� ! - !/ _-- i%'. �.'���/: i�'�������`- iii _1.i _-__ I•� +1 r . i - f > •-,' _ _ l: i ,Vo i � ::•bye � _ /� � = r\ ��. •.�` . �\ .. �' .•—� 0 ELSE g f;g pa`;¢4€�5-ea'��t'} € F 1 uavn /1 ; ULI AND ASSAT:iD�i �FS AECTS NLq.f �• — fi :lfuA ae r..+rern. nae r Y. 3 DC/:G-ESiFA OF EAGAN PUSFfTNG .ru. •..c•,-cif ,..• NI�iM • JAMB M AAN A140 A550Ps1ES AnCHIECM IMG ) �. +atuo ,:•+,w KNcupS i.witx�l lv7e (\�](_lL_ CIA "M EM r . ' y� C fit•�t• ELM - NJ ��fat• ttit•�ri =MINE MEN -ME MEE 111111.11 m 111M Ems ME EMS NONE MEE ME 0 g ME m HEM MEE Im m on lion Ems loin ME 0 0 so Bills MENEEME MIIT mi ME --ME m m M ME M 0 SEEN MEN ME MEME a ME ME ENE on son ME MEN sm SEEM MEMO ME IN ON ME ME Em ----ME MEE ------ ENE EMME ME sm ME MEMIN m ----ME ME M 0 MEE MEN 0, i; j II'''I ijil hi j imi'i x ri. MEN. 0, i; j II'''I ijil hi j imi'i x ri. 0, v z D A 2 M U) m MEN v z D A 2 M U) m sial/ li Z W 1213 51.7/67.0 121123 I 18 52.6/67.0 cam_ 127 7 18 4�0 OF- " �-, -- ------ -6 M.G. `moi 16 -GROUND STORAGE; 24RAGE / a 44.6/59.0' H. W. L: 1059 126 37.5761.0-c-- 16111 154 34.2 43.3/70.0 `16° ' ; )/72.0 L "I 16 9.0/65.0 ,!1T: 20 25 1020 L 8 895/ 2.8 100.0 DORCHESTER OF EAGAN 42.6/57.0 (172 L i G� L' 8.6 1 .......... SUBJECT PARCEL rREATMFNT­PL4!uA�. (Cos FIG. +3 City of eagan approved:- standard PUBLIC WATER plate WORKS MASTER PLA DEPARTMENT t6 7923 I 801.0 A -t .. 9P-29 809.7 818.0 2 • i AP -2 '...'� JP -6 8663 B-0BP-28 �� 8300 BP -33 �$ 868:4 J8 72' 36' 27' A -s 886.0 48' B_b _ . •• • 9, A -n A -o A -r JP -36 - - 1 w r :870.6 J• a 36 873.2. JP -35 JP - 7 I� 869.4 BP -3 '�12�2,.,87-1.4 8652 9 889.9 2 JP37JP905.28P-35 e c9080 4 A -P 920..2 872.0 874.0 1� S BP -4 N (875.0 8 74, 5 p- a/ 924 a5 874.2 BP 2 �`v r...✓"� 886.5 .927'2ti!r 8B6.1 LF 63 42J ati ,.. � ' I : B5B.0 '. 12' 9 12.. AP -51 B -k . :I 874.5 15 � :•:923:L?..:.�; v 886.5 LP -44 88990.3846.0 :...:• 910 OB B -d BP -17 918.1N- .".887.1 BP -23 892.0 LP -42. N 0,5 931.3 2 BP -9 ,w 932.3 "'882.9 ;. \ 820.0, 12 AP 12 91 t 3 R 8920 N : L -a 27" i ___.. 893.3 9/9.6, ti� BP 6 `-�;.:..lii.: P_ [: 1 L. 904.0 g 16 S: 27 AP 43 882.0 8960 BP 10 910.0 90/8% 1- 898.3 �5 909.8 B-9 916.0 N 12' 27,' .6,r-� o B -e BP -15 ��rr't 8 L^b. ! L.S.--3 ; ��. BP -20 -'- 2` 1 M 8990 SP -1 .,, LP=54 90/. 899.0 916.0 ' G-!; 897,0 920.0 �L,.: 901'1° 900.4 10 �• BP -13 9221.4 AP -40 9 5!O B- h :._..97.0 24 i Ut::.i �,.. 2T' BP -I I 912.1 15 920.0 1 j_ .' B-n90�8 907.0 1 2 9182 48� Q" 7 BP -21 I -'� =',r 4a'90Q0 909.6 ,h 916.0 92:rl 0.0 r, BP 7"' ri 920.0 o p`.LP;55 „ 92622 34 90809-0� 924.6 1 927.4 41 BP -12` 93501 r+..•.� ,`8 -m` �+ - -.90 0. 'i i r,�� 2.1 BP -32 ��. Ir 1,` ~ BP�34 933.9 ,r ' 988.0 9.3 937.6 I :, • !! g /006.0 .. L�.f F ,., LP -57 .911.0i1CCI?* A 1 I n nn DORCHESTER OF EAGAN SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. * 1 city of eagan -- a Standard PUBLIC STORM SEWER approved: plate #: g WORKS Z-) DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN _ L e e� i : . hTel idi 101 CO O 0 v � m � l� I EE I m J ci T W � cn t �o9£ 6 a � „' _ IL .ro - --_ `a —A t cm W 1 > a W cc a 4'j1 =� CL r� I 6 > N <N r cr 1 " na 9E n(3 9£ ' r gO18 ou I ►u f PL.�NNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAME OF P..D.: EAGAN 40 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (75-3) OWNER/DEVELOPER: DAN DOLAN LOCATION: NE2 OF THE NWQ OF SECTION 28 ._ DATE INITIALLY APPROVED: NOVEMBER 5, 1975 TERM OF P.D.: 10 YEARS DATE REVIEWED: NOVEMBER 12, 1985 PREPARED BY: JIM STURM I. LAND USES PARCEL ACRES LAND USE DWELLING UNITS A 2.2 R-3 16 B 19.2 R-4 230 C 13.0 R-3 92 R.O.W. 5.2 TOTAL 39_6 II. ACTIVITIES WHICH HAVE OCCURRED DURING THE"PAST YEAR There was no activity in 1985.'' The developer is requesting an extention to the original 10 year P.D. that expires in ..January. . _ III. PROPOSE D CHANGES •_+•._ :; .: ,';_; •. There have been no plans submitted by the developer requesting changes in 1985. IV. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ' The original agreement was- for 10 years (expires in January 1986) with an option to 'request -two - three year extentions. V. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS With the opening of 35E the developer is hoping to receive more inquiries/options on this property. The original agreement was amended to reflect the land use of R-3 and R-4 with no commercial parcels. " citV of' • •.. _ •.• ... -. - •�l• �_=.I'y,• •. ... Department of PIi1 p � • ! •.. - •::y yy.,�.•. tit AQAQ ARCEL 8,3 IN J . . . p. <-1..a AC. Q Ilk, \..l- / / •r '/.�� ?4 Oo tii0 902 ��� J J ,7 - N" .� ./ � , • ` � � � _ ���_ ` �--moi..__ J� I r PARCE R3CO _•-_ �` . A DENOTES PO TEN T:: -L 7 FESMEN TI,: f BUILD]SU AREA '� me ••rA. I T CoLA.,�n 7o.. d 30 Parcel. B 19.2 Aces - Land use R-4 230 Dwelling Units 4-� p2o P05C 1 �(GC a33 Parcel C 13 acres ± ' Land use R-3 92 Dwelling Units Parcel A 0 2.2 acres - Land use R-3 C 16 D.U. F �o TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR •/FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: OCTOBER 12, 1987 SUBJECT: DORCHESTER OF EAGAN - ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION i At the October 1st, Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed the proposed development entitled "Dorchester of Eagan". The Commission made the following recommendation: 1. That this plat be subject to a cash dedication requirement. 2. That this plat be subject to a trailway on County Road #30. KV/bls cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide °"13 APC Minutes September 22, 1987 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet shall be permitted. 3. That development shall submit a grading and drainage plan acceptable to staff which addresses but is not limited to the issues outlined in the staff report. 4. The development shall assume full responsibility for all damages which may result and/or any reconstruction of the existing trunk facilities which may be necessitated by the grading and construction activities of the proposed development. 5. Future homeowners of this development shall be advised of the Williams Brothers pipeline. 6. The Development Agreement & Planned Development Agreement shall clearly indicate a density and number of units to be as requested by the developer. All voted in favor except Wilkins and Voracek who voted no. Gustafson moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning to the Planned Development of 5 years, which would have zoning that would revert to A (Agricultural) upon termination of the development contract or failure to comply with the agreement. It was also noted that the Homeowners Declarations should provide that the cost of the improvement by the City, if it becomes necessary, would be assessable to the homeowners. All voted yes. The developer requested an October 6, 1987 City Council review. The Commission suggested this be left up to staff. DORCHESTER OF EAGAN - PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Keller Investment Company for a preliminary plat for 320 apartment units on 37.5 acres within the Eagan 40 Planned Development, located south of County Road #30 and west of Thomas Lake Road in the northwest quarter of Section 28. City Planner Runkle noted that an EAW was completed in 1986 and received a negative declaration. In 1975, the Planned Unit Development provided for 338 units. In May of 1986, a PUD was extended for a 3 year period and the Deerfield Addition was approved for 322 apartment units, consisting of nine 36 unit building as opposed to four 80 unit buildings presently proposed. A neighborhood meeting had been held but staff had not been present. rl� APC Minutes September 22, 1987 Mr. Dave Sellergren appeared on behalf of the developer, Mr. Bob Keller, along with Bill Dolan. Mr. Sellergren noted that the Eagan 40 Partnership had owned the land for over 10 years and that it consisted of severe terrain, including a deep ravine between two buildings. He noted that the buildings had been consolidated into 4 buildings, to leave as much land untouched as possible. He also provided elevations, indicating the effect of lighting, shrubbery and drainage to the townhouses to the south. He advised that 18 to 20 foot tall trees would be planted along the south side of the southerly most apartment building. Additional plantings were to be provided along Thomas Lake Road, in addition to a bark path to the Thomas Lake School. He advised that one, two and three bedroom units were being constructed, ranging in size from approximately 700 to 1,300 square feet. Mr. Pat Geagan, 1577 Baylor Court, Unit B, was present and expressed concern in regard to the length of the units, which the developer indicated were approximately 250 feet. He also indicated there were some questions as to whether notice had been received by the new buyers of the New Horizon townhomes to the south. It was his understanding that many of the buyers had been advised by New Horizon that the area in question would be developed as R-1. Questions were raised in regard to the drainage, which the applicant and engineer- indicated would be taken to the pond in the center of the development. Ms. Pam Clinton, the Homeowner's Association President, to the south, indicated that the sellers were deceiving owners as to the proposed development and that a path to the school would help keep children from cutting across the townhome areas. The developer advised Member Wilkins that Lot 2, Block 2 would not be developed and would remain in its natural state and could, in effect, be indicated as part of Lot 1. It was noted that the east end of the building was within 100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline right-of-way. Member McCrea questioned the term of the PUD. It was indicated that it would have been extended three years from the expiration of its previous term. Member McCrea also questioned the height of the buildings, which were three stories, in addition to an underground parking area. The developer advised member Krisnik as to the location of retaining walls, including a 2 to 3 foot wall along the westerly portion of the property. It was noted that the 2.2 acres on the east side of Thomas Lake Road were not a part of this plat and have been designated for 16 units. Member McCrea asked that staff determine the expiration date of the PUD and the underlying zoning of the property. APC Minutes September 22, 1987 Gustafson moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The garage shall be included in the rental unit price if only two stalls per unit are provided with this project. 3. Lot 2, Block 2, shall be incorporated into Lot 1, Block 2, on the final plat. 4. Perimeter landscaping in undisturbed areas of the second phase shall be installed with the first phase. 5. All public utilities and streets necessary to serve this development shall be petitioned for by the developer and ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. 6. That a bark chip trail shall be provided from the apartments to the Thomas Lake Road toward -the school. 7. That future renters will be advised of the presence of the Williams Brothers pipeline. 8. The proposal shall be subject to review of the height restrictions imposed by City Code. All voted yea, except Wilkins, McCrea and Krisnik who voted nay. CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing of the evening was upon the application of M. G. Astleford Co., Inc. for preliminary plat consisting of 1.87 acre lot for a Building Block Day Care Center and two outlots containing 4.4 acres, located in. the southeast quarter of Section 30 on the north side of Cliff Road, east of Cliff Drive, and west of Scott Trail. Mr. Runkle indicated that the plat had been somewhat revised in order to provide an access from Cliff Drive. It had been suggested that the access should be changed to the east to provide a drive-through effect. Mr. Ray Williams indicated that there was no intent to change the drive access to the east and was not sure whether to proceed with the revised preliminary plat. Mr. Voracek pointed out that a straight -through drive would provide a short-cut to drivers wanting to go from Scott Trail to Cliff Drive and not wanting to attempt to access Cliff Road. Voracek moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: l Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 PRELIMINARY PLAT/CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION E. Preliminary Plat for M.G. Astleford Company, Inc., Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition Consisting of One .87 Acre Lot and Two Outlots Containing 4.4 Acres --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on September 22, 1987, to consider a preliminary plat application for Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition presented by M.G. Astleford Company consisting of one .87 acre lot and two outlots containing 4.4 acres located on the north side of Cliff Road. The APC is recommending approval of the preliminary plat. For additional information, refer to the Plann g and Eng Bering Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages q6 through �. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission is recommending a park- land dedication requirement according to commercial parkland dedication rates. For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page(s) Arn. I ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition. q9 MEMO TO: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: JIM STURM, PLANNER I MIRE FOERTSCH, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 SUBJECT: REVISED BUILDING BLOCK DAY CARE ADDITION In July 1987, the Building Block Day Care Addition received preliminary plat approval as well as a Planned Development Amendment to allow a day care facility in a LB district. Since then, a proposed automotive service center south of that plat abutting Cliff Road was denied by the Advisory Planning Commission and withdrawn by the developer prior to Council action on September 15, 1987. The developers of the Building Block Addition want to revise their original site plan so that a connection between Cliff Drive and Scott Trail can be made. This will split Outlot A of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 1st Addition into two separate outlots: Outlot A (2.57 acres), Outlot B (1.83 acres) and the Building Block, Lot 1 will increase from .69 acre to .87 acre. The two outlots will remain designated for LB use and future platting. In an effort to ensure proper legal notification this modification is being brought before the APC and City Council prior to the final plat submission. Staff recommends that this plat be renamed "Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition" so the natural progression of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park remains intact. The original -staff report and City Council conditions have been attached for your review with some new conditions. r� q REVISED ENGINEERING REPORT GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed grading plan provides for floor and parking lot elevations at 905 and 904 respectively. Outlot A is proposed to be graded to approximately a 906 elevation in anticipation of future development. At the time of the preparation of this staff report, the development of an auto mall proposed on Lot 1, Block 1 of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition is unknown. The proposed grading plan generally conforms to the existing grades on Cliff Drive and Scott Trail. The development is proposing to construct a storm water storage pond in the southerly portion of Outlot A immediately north and west of proposed Lot 1, Block 1. The runoff generated by Lot 1, Block 1 is directed into a proposed temporary drainage ditch which would in turn drain into the proposed storm water pond being constructed on the southerly portion of Outlot A. The proposed drainage ditch along the southerly portion of Lot 1, Block 1 redefines an existing drainage swale which currently receives runoff from the existing storm sewer located at a low point in Scott Trail. This low point in Scott Trail is located immediately to the southeast of the proposed Lot 1, Block 1. When the outlet to Pond AP -50 (lying easterly of Scott Trail) is provided in the future, the drainage from Lot 1, Block 1 and proposed Outlot B will be required to be directed east into Pond AP - 50. Considering the elevations proposed for Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot B, this alternate is the most feasible permanent drainage plan for these two areas. The developer shall escrow the necessary funds to provide the required storm sewer and to fill and relandscape the swale in the future when the Pond AP -50 outlet is constructed. The storm sewer system which conveys the water from the drainage swale between Lot 11 Block 1 and Outlot B into the proposed pond on Outlot A will need to be abandoned at that time. No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as part of this application. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water service of sufficient size and capacity are readily available from the existing facilities in Scott Trail. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to take access to the site from the easterly adjacent Scott Trail with a proposed future entrance off of Cliff Drive. The proposed access location from Scott Trail creates a potential for a conflicting left hand turn maneuvers with the existing entrance to the development on the east side of Scott Trail. Staff recommends against the Scott Trail location and proposes the development construct its future entrance at this time. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The appropriate easements will be required for the proposed pond, its outlet and for the future storm sewer to be constructed in the swale between.Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot B. Adequate streets rights-of-way have been provided for Cliff Drive and Scott Trail. All regulatory agency permits shall be required from the appropriate agency in the proper time frame. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed site has been assessed at the proper rate for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer trunk and laterals. There are no pending or proposed assessments of record. CONDITIONS: CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARR 3RD ADDITION 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted on grading plan. The financial guarantee shall not be released until one year after the date of installation. 3. If a shortage of parking is evident, the City may require parking lot expansion. Nineteen spaces shall be initially approved. 4. No mechanical units shall be visible from the residential property or from Scott Trail. 5. The development shall be responsible for the cost of the construction of the required storm sewer to convey the runoff from Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot B into the existing storm sewer system in Scott Trail when the outlet for Pond AP -50 is constructed. 6. The development shall be responsible for constructing its proposed entrance to Cliff Drive at this time and will not be allowed access to Scott Trail in the proposed location. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadway$ as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer. in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control _plan must be prepared in -accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval.. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date ofC�Tinstallation. (ovrR ) JS STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements'as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission Approved: August 25, 1987 Revised: STANDARD ^' LTS n 2U( City Council_ September 15, 1987 a I I I '(:0V UNL )lY,Vc: -rd -I0 l:VO J o I I I l \�� •�' -1IVlil 1100S --- cs / / a ` I ;W z0-uo U.I LL I— i z0 #90 z0-190 ` 1 V I 20-290 I � I zo-199 -- ~� •� i I � (�Y [_; I L�f / 101.100 I ern ..,�, i.�.r i •-- •• �i4, i 1 � sa *ON CIVOU AiNnoo 0 n V ^ t VV t\ v g 1 W d : zh I I I '(:0V UNL )lY,Vc: -rd -I0 l:VO J o I I I l \�� •�' -1IVlil 1100S --- cs / / a ` I ;W z0-uo U.I LL I— i z0 #90 z0-190 ` 1 V I 20-290 I � I zo-199 -- ~� •� i I � (�Y [_; I L�f / 101.100 I ern ..,�, i.�.r i •-- •• �i4, i 1 � sa *ON CIVOU AiNnoo 0 n 9 f t S� 5! 8 i N W CU. I Eo n teLLJ 3 N J I s '6$el3S$ i� m .Ws. r= t+ s; 3 1 iT i� m e 4 Y Z c T1 } ¢ W :s 'g 6T H Fe 6. 6sa -�: I € Q E E• ��. I t+ 11 6T H Fe 6. 6sa -�: I € Q E E• ��. I k SCD! TRAIL R S . ... ........ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL --AP-; 890... 8944 DAKOTA I COUNTY F. L-yy CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3rd FIG. -5P 1 city of eagan approved:standard PUBLIC STORM SEWER,-, plate 4: WORKS DEPARTMENT I MASTER PLA v 0.3469.0 c nIGN 'I 2 SCHOOL �A -- Y -C, 70.0 :OUNTY PARK CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3RD SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. -�P3 City of eagan WATER approved standard PUBLIC plate 4: WORKS MASTER PLAN —. �- DEPARTT1 cl� -T� W -S DAKOTA COUNTY CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3RD SUBJECT PARCEL FIG.. 10 city of eagan SANITARY SEWER approved: standard PUBLIC plate 4: WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENTI M CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PRELIMINARY PLAT (BUILDING BLOCK ADDITION) APPLICANT: WILLIAM DUNKLEY LOCATION: S.E. 1/4 SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONING: LB WITHIN CEDAR CLIFF P.D. 80-2 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 23, 1987 'DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 11, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: Separate applications have been submitted by Building Block Day Care Centers requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a day care facility in A P.D. LB (Limited Business) district and a Preliminary Plat for the Building Block Addition. The original P.D. Agreement designated this area for office buildings. Therefore an Amendment to the P.D. will be necessary. This one lot plat is located along the west side of Scott Trail immediately south of the existing duplex's. The 5600 S.F. building and site plan was designed to accommodate office use if this day care use were to change in the future. COMMENTS: The one story building is located on the northern portion of this .69 acre lot and,will act as a buffer between the parking lot and residential homes. The 19% lot coverage is within the 20% permitted by Code and all building and parking setbacks have been maintained. Code requires 29 parking stalls for office use. A plan demonstrating proof for 32 has been submitted and 19 are proposed for the day care. A possible secondary access to the west may be desireable in the future. If this occurred parking stalls would be expanded to the east. The landscape plan will need minor revisions and must be submitted on a grading plan with the final plat package. Emphasis will be on the north property line and along Scott Trail. The trash enclosure will be attached to the building and constructed of the same materials. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The existing site drains southerly and westerly to a low area located east of Cliff Drive. This low area will eventually outlet through an existing storm sewer in Cliff Drive at elevation 900.05, which is currently 6 ft. higher. This undeveloped low area is not intended to be a drainage basin under the overall development plan for the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park. However, the low area currently receives runoff from the existing storm sewer located at the low point in Scott Trail which is immediately south of this development. Therefore, the storm sewer in Scott Trail will have to be reconstructed sometime in the future to drain easterly into Pond AP -50 which currently has no outlet The City is currently involved in litigation regarding the lack of an outlet for Pond AP -50. Therefore, no additional runoff should be allowed into AP -50 until its outlet has been installed and no additional runoff should be allowed to the current low area west of this site. In summary, the existing circumstances prohibit any further development in this general area without a positive outlet for Pond AP -50. If, and when, the outlet for AP -50 is scheduled, it is recommended the approved grading plan insure that the parking lot drain easterly to Scott Trail and that catch basins be constructed as part of this development at the radius point of the driveway entrance at Scott Trail. The catch basins must then connect to the existing storm sewer in Scott Trail. In the interim, the temporary drainage ditch between the storm sewer in Scott Trail and Cliff Drive shall be preserved until the outlet for AP -50 is functional. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water service of sufficient size and capacity can be provided from the existing utilities in Scott Trail. ASSESSMENTS: The parcel has been assessed at the proper rate for all city utility services. There are no pending or proposed assessments of record. a CONDITIONS: (BUILDING BLOCK ADDITION) 1) All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2) A revised landscape plan shall be submitted on grading plan. The financial guarantee shall not be released until 1 year after the date of installation. 3) If a shortage of parking is evident, the City may require parking lot expansion. Nineteen spaces shall be initially approved. 4) No mechanical units shall be visible from the residential property or from Scott Trail. 5) The outlet for AP -50 must be authorized by Council action prior to final plat approval or building permit issuance. 6) Revised grading and site plans must be approved prior to building permit issuance. ill BLCEK CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL o\b C—) Lx3 C7-- 50 0 d q q C—) cxj z . z z z C—) HE Z m C4 F111 Z Q .ol 1!77:77 ih Al Eli —1A 4' 1 i TIN. % 1 ll G5 � � � ; . § m■9� eW� " HAI §� v ��) \ E m ; o= \ §\ � � ! -- � . °C, � ? � � ( � � � ! -- � . °C, 41 } i! � }}\ � � r . Council Minutes July 21, 1987 BUILDII-G.BLOCK CHILD CARE CENTER ADDITION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & PRELIMINARY PLAT An application was submitted by William Dunkley for conditional use permit and preliminary plat approval for Building Block Child Care Center Addition, intended for child care cem'Ier and further, amendment to the Cedar Cliff Planned Development for a day care in a Limited Business district. The application arzeli:consisted of 0.7 acres and the Advisory Planning Commission at,:ita meeting on June 23, 1987, recommended approval with certain conditions. Mr. Runkle explained that 19 parking spaces should'be adequate, with the Code requiring 29 spaces. Mr. Ellison noted that it would appear to be a good buffer to the single family tcd_the north. The proposal was for a 5,600 square foot building.' e.The plan provides for 32 maximum parking stalls in the event that additional parking is necessary. There was concern about the storm -outlet for AP -50 and Mr. Colbert explained that with developmentp in the area, the _ tree and easement issue may be resolved. The Council preferred a permanent resolution to the storm sewer issue. Thi Ellison moved, Wachter seconded the motion -tom amend the planned development as presented and also for conditional use permit approval. All voted in favor. ter_ �l Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion., to approve the application for preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: by 1. All standard platting conditions shall bec%dhered to. 2. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted on a grading plan. The financial guarantee shall not be reUeased until 1 year after the date of installation. _ 3. If a shortage of parking is evident, 'the City may require parking lot expansion and the owner shall,:i]upon such request, provide for and develop such additional spaces regb ested to conform t_ with City standards. Nineteen spaces shall be inCUtially approved. ` ikl 4. No mechanical units shall be visible f1mm the residential property or from Scott Trail. Cc' 5. Either the outlet for AP -50 shall be auitorized by Council action prior to final plat approval or building.tpermit issuance, or on-site ponding area must be developed to City sttand ards. 6. Revised grading and site plans shall beapproved prior to building permit issuance. All voted yes. 3.7-- �71 q C: G APC Minutes September 22, 1987 Gustafson moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The garage shall be included in the rental unit price if only two stalls per unit are provided with this project. 3. Lot 2, Block 2, shall be incorporated into Lot 1, Block 2, on the final plat. 4. Perimeter landscaping in undisturbed areas of the second phase shall be installed with the first phase. 5. All public utilities and streets necessary to serve this development shall be petitioned for by the developer and ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. 6. That a bark chip trail shall be provided from the apartments to the Thomas Lake Road toward -the school. 7. That future renters will be advised of the presence of the Williams Brothers pipeline. 8. The proposal shall be subject to review of the height restrictions imposed by City Code. All voted yea, except Wilkins, McCrea and Krisnik who voted nay. CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing of the evening was upon the application of M. G. Astleford Co., Inc. for preliminary plat consisting of 1.87 acre lot for a Building Block Day Care Center and two outlots containing 4.4 acres, located in the southeast quarter of Section 30 on the north side of Cliff Road, east of Cliff Drive, and west of Scott Trail. Mr. Runkle indicated that the plat had been somewhat revised in order to provide an access from Cliff Drive. It had been suggested that the access should be changed to the east to provide a drive-through effect. Mr. Ray Williams indicated that there was no intent to change the drive access to the east and was not sure whether to proceed with the revised preliminary plat. Mr. Voracek pointed out that a straight -through drive would provide a short-cut to drivers wanting to go from Scott Trail to Cliff Drive and not wanting to attempt to access Cliff Road. Voracek moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: APC Minutes September 22, 1987 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted on grading plan. The financial guarantee shall not be released until one year after the date of installation. 3. If a shortage of parking is evident, the City may require parking lot expansion. Nineteen spaces shall be initially approved. 4. No mechanical units shall be visible from the residential property or from Scott Trail. 5. The development shall be responsible for the cost of the construction of the required storm sewer to convey the runoff from Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot B into the existing storm sewer system in Scott Trail when the outlet for Pond AP -50 is constructed. 6. The development shall be responsible for constructing its proposed entrance to Cliff Drive at this time. 7. The developer shall resolve the issue of preventing a thoroughfare between Scott Trail and Cliff Drive. All voted yes except Gustafson and Krisnik who voted no. YORKTON SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The last public hearing of the evening convened by Chairman Harrison was in regard to the application of Yorkton Limited, Inc. for preliminary plat consisting of 5 lots and one outlot on approximately 37.3 acres (Outlot A of Yorkton Industrial Park South) located in the east half of Section 13, east of Highway #149 and south of Becker Road. Mr. Runkle introduced the project, including the overall concept plan. Mr. Jim Kramer was present to answer questions on behalf of the developer. There was no on,e from the public to address the proposal. Member McCrea questioned the applicability of an EAW once the overall project exceeds 300,000 square feet. Mr. Runkle indicated that one building clearly did not result in the impact requiring an EAW and that the state was presently re -looking at the threshold process to consider impacts, rather than square footage determinations. Wilkins moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 PRELIMINARY PLAT/YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK SOUTH 2ND ADDITION F. Preliminary Plat for Yorkton Industrial Park South 2nd Addition Consisting of Five Lots and One Outiot on 37.3 Acres --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on September 22, 1987, to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by Yorkton Ltd., Inc., for Yorkton Industrial Park South 2nd Addition consisting of five lots and one outlot on 37.3 acres. The APC is recommending approval of the preliminary lat application as presented. Enclosed on pages 41 through ` § is a copy of the Planning and Enginnering report. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is requiring a cash donation according to commercial parkland dedication requirements. For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page (s)("-�_O'*x�j ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled Yorkton Industrial Park South 2nd Addition. al CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (YORRTON SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARR 2ND ADDITION) APPLICANT: YORRTON LTD. LOCATION: E 1/2 SECTION 13 EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 22, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 14, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat for the Yorkton South Industrial Park 2nd Addition. This plat consists of 5 lots that are consistent with the overall conceptual plan that was reviewed in 1985. Lot 1 of the 2nd Addition is proposed for an office/warehouse facility while Lots 2-5 will be platted so they can be marketed as approved building sites. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The entire Yorkton South plat consists of 43.2 acres abutting Inver Grove Heights to the east and Hwy. 149 on the west. All adjacent land uses in Eagan are also LI except for an agricultural strip along the west side of Hwy. 149. The topography generally flows towards the enter of the .Situ i:at:r a rc^ather 'Large ponding area. The existing slough and scrub trees in the southeast portion of the site will not be disturbed at this time. There is no significant vegetation of any value on this site which contains mostly field grasses. The applicant will need to bring in fill to the proposed building sites. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES/OVERALL CONCEPT: The two existing buildings (45,502 s.f. total) and the proposed lots with potential development of 170,775 s.f. (35% of each lot) could total 216,257 s.f. of building area. This is below the 300,000 s.f. threshold of a mandatory EAW. This proposal will plat '11.5 acres into five lots (170,775 s.f maximum building area) and leave the rest of the site as an Outlot of this 2nd Addition. The applicant has a proposed user for Lot 1 and the other lots are being platted on a speculative basis. The turnaround time for platting each lot as an individual addition has made it difficult to market the area as an approved building site. All proposed uses for the 4 remaining lots would have to fit LI zoning regulations or else receive appropriate Council action prior to the building permit issuance. Staff recommends that the front of the buildings along Hwy. 149 and Becker Road have an 'office' appearance - not manufacturing look in order to be consistent with the previous buildings that have a brick facade. The applicant submitted a landscape plan for all 5 lots along Hwy. 149 and Becker Road in order to provide consistency for the entire development. All sizes, species and quantities are acceptable in a preliminary way. LOT 1 - This lot consists of 2.3 acres with a total building area of 31,481 s.f. or 31% in a 35% district. The office on the northwest corner of the building will contain 7,110 s.f. with the remaining 24,371 s.f. for warehousing. The office area would require 38 parking stalls with the warehouse parking to be determined by the Council. It appears that the 62 10' wide stalls will be sufficient for this building. Staff recommends either moving the building to the east slightly so that the drive aisle to the north matches the entry into the subject parking lot or eliminate the median on the north side in Lot 2. Hanco Corporation, a warehouse distributor, will be -the owner of the building. They are a distributor serving the tire industry, selling tire related products of all kinds. There is no manufacturing; they buy products from factories and sell to tire dealers in a 10 state area. No exterior storage or pylon sign is being proposed with this building. The applicant is aware of the City's requirement that roof top mechanical equipment is not visible from the street and none is being shown on the submitted elevations. If any is proposed (for all 5 lots), it should be incorporated into the building design and screened with the same materials as the building facade. The proposed 2 -story building will be constructed of bronze glass and precast concrete panels similar in color. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The existing site generally slopes from State Highway #149 easterly and westerly from County Highway #63 to a centrally located low area. The majority of this site requires approximately 6'-12' of fill with minimal areas of cut accept for the excavation for Pond GP -7. Pond GP -7 is a designated storm water pond in the City of Eagan Comprehensive Storm Sewer Guide. The development proposes to direct all storm water runoff generated by this site into this pond. The installation of trunk storm sewer facilities are required prior to the ultimate development of the property. The onsite ponding area, Pond GP -7 (and its outlet) are required for the development of this 5 -lot development. The required storage volume for Pond GP -7 is approximately 12 ac/ft with its outflow requirements limited to 8.5 cfs. An incomplete erosion and sediment control plan was submitted with the preliminary plat. The erosion and sediment control plan should follow the submittal requirements and general criteria provided by the City of Eagan. An erosion and sediment control pint which meets the general criteria including both the site map and a narrative are required to be submitted and approved by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service for this site is provided by an existing trunk sanitary sewer line which flows through this site from south to north to a lift station located south of County Highway #63A. The lift station then pumps the flow from this existing trunk sanitary sewer line to the existing gravity sanitary sewer on the east side of State Highway #149. Water service to this site is provided by a 16" trunk water main located along the easterly edge of State Trunk Highway #149 and an 8" water main located on the southerly side of County Highway #63A. The developer proposes to take his water service for the five proposed lots from the existing water mains in State Trunk Highway #149 and County Road 63A. Looping of the water main from the existing 8" water main in County Highway 63A south along the west side of County Highway #63 to an existing 8" water main stubbed at approximately the south lineofYorkton South development will be required as a condition of ultimate development of the property. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development proposes to take access from State Highway #149 for the southerly two lots of the proposed five lot subdivision. The remaining three lots are proposed to take their access from County Highway 63A. These proposed driveway locations are subject to the approval of their respective jurisdictional agencies. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The proposed development will be responsible for providing all easements required for the surface drainage, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water main systems required to adequately serve this development. The development will be required to dedicate a 40' half right-of-way for County Highway 63A and a 55' half right-of-way for County Highway #63. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired in a timely manner as required by the affected agencies. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed site has been previously assessed for sanitary sewer trunk and water area under Project #58. TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENTS ......$217,400 The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval: PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 58-4 Water Lateral Benefit $ 20.55/ff 11108 ff $ 22,769 195 Sanitary Sewer Lateral 15.06/ff 11095 ff 16,491 Benefit 442 Storm Sewer Trunk .075/sf 196,660 sf 14,750 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS .... $ 54,010 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on final plat dimensions and rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. 1b4 The proposed site is subject to the following pending assessment against the property from Project #442: PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 442 Storm Sewer Trunk $ .072/sf 641,200 sf $ 46,166 442 Water Lateral 14.56/ff 1,365 ff 19,874 442 Storm Sewer Lateral 174.72/lf 250 if 68,822 18.42/ff 1,365 ff 442 Street 58.31/ff 1,365 ff 79,600 442 Services 2,860 TOTAL PENDING ASSESSMENTS ......$217,400 The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval: PROJ # DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 58-4 Water Lateral Benefit $ 20.55/ff 11108 ff $ 22,769 195 Sanitary Sewer Lateral 15.06/ff 11095 ff 16,491 Benefit 442 Storm Sewer Trunk .075/sf 196,660 sf 14,750 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS .... $ 54,010 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on final plat dimensions and rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. 1b4 CONDITIONS: 1. All signage will be subject to the Sign Ordinance and one time fee of $ 2.50/s . f . 2. Lots 1-5 shall have an office appearance from the adjacent roads. 3. No roof top mechanical equipment shall be visible from adjacent streets. 4. No exterior storage shall be allowed without separate Conditional Use Permits. 5. The development shall be responsible for obtaining the appropriate approvals from MnDOT and Dakota County for proposed driveway locations. �o5 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined .in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights -of -Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development 'shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and S2ecifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer, in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control .plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval.. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. (OVER) I c ((�J STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. I Advisory Planning Commission Approved: Au ust 25, 1987 Revised: STANDARD LTSn2 City Council September 15, 1987 SITE ZONING LAND USE MAP NO od vj 'Y Ir ivy pug 462 lk A I -F - MAI Z' a Pq r 5 g sif od vj 'Y Ir ivy pug 462 lk CY liq to ,tA lfq" q 0 1 IV 10 Y Al tl W -A > ID X CY liq to ,tA lfq" q 0 1 IV 10 Y Al tl "I"V6,171 TS' 0) GRADING And DRAINAGE PLAN For: YORKTON DEVELOPMENT NORTH -7 scale: ,r=;4W Xt- 't TA flA i if, Av F 3.- Denote 'pmop"ed I looticgo A. � Denoces priposed a lovat 6. Donates propO.&d directima E. -G. RUD a SONSS'"'IN Land Survevors.-...,, c n \ j3'rta.� a,utN J� del Q111l i Ili i ,.-. r --3 R�[MIAIN� LA110SC-7e Peau �jL: r40: o• `- LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE MK- il0 I ��GR PTIpN Steri NOTES F'_'. i�� _ae1-..LLaIJ PorGA1r11_lA Zd'jbff..II C-- h:f. I I r,�LecK MWS SrR L)L� cWlp MUI.cH 1 5 �c DIM1T GBZAm, `•` P N-Zk SLOPE '/4 PER FOOT I 34• %. �. J �WmD _J I �, ,nAe5114u 5 CEEsJ %9P1 cMIP 'nILLM !0 1 12 I' RA01U6 ' % •:{ U1�Sz5E{p,ure,6eesN A5N jl:!--- T2 CONC. CURB Cl,R6 CONC. CURB e a CONC. CURB�WALK_ e S: APE eA �Tki 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE TO UECOMY- COMPLETELY FAHIL1AR NITH SITE CDNUITId115. :. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED IRTTIL ALL GRADING AND CDN- STRUCTWH UA6 BEEN CtiMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. I. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION ,)F TIIE AM -11 -AR 51ANVAWI II1R NIIRSERY STOI'K• AML.HICAN A::SI>,'IATIIUI OI' NIIX:+EXIMLH. 1• OY.!'r Wu:O ML'IAIH WILL. EB INSTAI.UO CIIIIER ALL TH—S AND 5XII BS IIIAT AXE LSJLATED YRCA GXUUND 01VER AREAS MU GENERAL SHRUB MASSES. S. ALL AREAS WERE SOD AND ROCK MULCH TDUCH SIW.L HAVE VALLEY VILM PLASTIC EWER OR EQUAL. 6. SOD SIIALL BE CULTURED KEWTUCKY BLUEGRASS TREE OF WEEDS AND CLUMP. LANDSCAPE MNTRACTD0. WILL WATER AT TINE OF INSTAL- LATION. ALL SWPES GREATER THAT J 10 1 SHALL BE STAKED. ANY SLIDING OF SOD SMALL BE REPLACED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 7. ALL DI TR118ED AREAS TO BE SODDED. E. RDCK MULCH 0 MAINTENANCE STRIP WITH BLACK POLY BELOW. F4A[S CEIITERlD � "1.6 Esfl�l� 12"oL LINE o Jj_DOOR LFTG. — a� I I � I I. I i "rLQnwE 1I„ T u . L _I � I q 4" 4 T,'LG. m LL 1 _I / B7 CONC. BLK. �-'• N W +. SI � SEG yTVULT. N cL sN a ENTRY STOOP k� r -' I/ a - =0• irl SECTION s I `1 �•I oWg;;l� No CURB CUT ELF- 5,5-�L O�KTOa-1 INpUS r►K� aarru VICINITY MAP .e AI c „ U. I'+ d 2y.o• I Io, 7 5r c ,_: 7o o' � d 14' 1 9 nr • V �o[„I la. 5oc" S� q A _ I N r1T CVL`{ fiRJMuJ.�a)S� �'_ . �—�— .__ __—_ i�� • 0 I 3V 4 dl O I I_�ilGt __� I a = Y -I 7110 SF -41 �. Q I �I �.� �•weAJY pull � I � •� "'� � 1rr�. _ I I 01 '^ <• LJAR�K7JSE 40.EA - 24371 sQ.•-- p 1 �0 0 • ��_ 111 _'_� � O • SITE PLAN @- I GEt-IERAL Nc>TSS - I UTILITY LEGEWID I •SANITARY SEWtR NAT1IRAL GAS TeLEowoNE DOMEiTIC- DATER CUKIE0 ELFGTRICAL. V, Y WFONMATIOTI SITE: 54epcaas SLi1LDR.1G: OF I°LCE : 1110 4"P.FT• D,IA�kvJSE ARC A, •Ih371. 6o.TT. TOTAL PARKI,JC-: (m2I GARS SUEET INDEX Ai —1 � SWEET, SITE/Lsnlo5c1PE P.ANs A2 GRAO',NG Q GRAINAL= p_:,.,, A3 �12si FLcv2 PLAN a4 FZ F:EcTEDGLG?LA.W G5 . LE ✓ �+•T 10 X15 :.� W a�L �JcGi IONS L-1 ✓c"�.LS a'1 e�Th,t� �rALL. � sTe.lr� �Tr-I�5 drawn tly K A J. IPK- date revisions A A 0 0 0 AIL 9 O D E_ R F V I F W KANCO OFF CE AM) WARF1Cll'SE @ill LarNG GM67 OCCUPANCY: B - 2 1- LLSLfPF-m CONSTRICTION TYPE: 2 - N L'I IWAT -L)EPT. BUILDING AREA: OFFICE AREA 1ST FLOOR: 3,529 SF OFFICE AREA 2ND FLMR: 7,581 SF VWARMOLISE AREA 1ST FLOOR: 24,311 SF' 4 PER FOOT 4�,CURD WAREHME AREA M FLOOR: 4,519 SF QLOS5SF:36,000 SF LEND SURFACESAI1aWABLE AREA: 12,000 SF ALLOWABLE AREA INCREASES: __ RADIUS leerence m all ides: IOOx a 24,000 SF j'—'1 wt—atic vpriN ler: 300% c 72,000 SF BUILDI.K. OONSTRUCrIai: 'LAN FOUNDATION: CONCRETE FLOORS: CCNCRMT = I -O E%7FRIOR WALIS: PRECAST WALL PANELS AND M-LSS ROOF: SITL DECK AND SINGLE PLY ROOFING OOCL?LNCV LOAD: 6,985 \h7 SF OFFICE AT 100 SF 70 BASED ON NET AREA 28,534 NET SF W.AREROLSE AT c 95 1 • TOTAL OOCLPANC1' = 165 I {`IGsz0k GNE2 � I41!E,S SAGA, 4 $ PAV INS VJNTRIAL w h 171TVMIIJ-k.Y Ur -N1 DJTY (( C0.RS� n '1 'L"MLN. L>ITOmOIX `yS; G1.Ay�rj 5' GLAtS Si �ASt O � _ 2 LAyr2S 11" WOUS� 144 O�/!'�E'1'JM •SANITARY SEWtR NAT1IRAL GAS TeLEowoNE DOMEiTIC- DATER CUKIE0 ELFGTRICAL. V, Y WFONMATIOTI SITE: 54epcaas SLi1LDR.1G: OF I°LCE : 1110 4"P.FT• D,IA�kvJSE ARC A, •Ih371. 6o.TT. TOTAL PARKI,JC-: (m2I GARS SUEET INDEX Ai —1 � SWEET, SITE/Lsnlo5c1PE P.ANs A2 GRAO',NG Q GRAINAL= p_:,.,, A3 �12si FLcv2 PLAN a4 FZ F:EcTEDGLG?LA.W G5 . LE ✓ �+•T 10 X15 :.� W a�L �JcGi IONS L-1 ✓c"�.LS a'1 e�Th,t� �rALL. � sTe.lr� �Tr-I�5 drawn tly K A J. IPK- date revisions A A 0 0 0 AIL Y 11 Q f Z I _. G new l Wol HANCO BUILDING . Yorkton Develops` l�t 1690 Unhmlly A...... tit. P ul. n _ Ina 1. (612) of v SUVA MN LTU Inc (612) 484-9000 �` �F 4 1� II O I� 'Ii II II I li I± �l 1� afli I I� 11 S91) cl 1 I iV° .898 b, rq .yII II G new l Wol HANCO BUILDING . Yorkton Develops` l�t 1690 Unhmlly A...... tit. P ul. n _ Ina 1. (612) of v SUVA MN LTU Inc (612) 484-9000 �` 0 cl N -T N -JJ 12' N -EE AOOO5. L -'7A 1- j T S X 12" _ -`/;' N 95 -w. N 8 B Igo, 10 v 0% IN I I --j! C -HH Q01 '12 55 11 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME N -AA AL YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd SUBJECT PARCEL SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN �'l' S Lu (D � FIG.- +2 approved: standard I plate #: b 51.4/72.0 ............. ra 8 . . ....6T6186.0 496/66.0 � 2 0' 7. �E)2d'63 2411 11 24 �6 D6 8 ..... .... .... aq.9-T , 8" HILLS , i 67 ' 5/43.0 62 10 M.G. WESCOTT i GROUND STORAGE H.W.L. 1059 '1611 F-,, b E N LOTS ........ .. ........ ............. . .... ......... 1611 C13 .. ...... . .....T. -Hj H -1 lu 50.3167.0 1791611 � malft � YORKTON "5/610 56.4/76.0 ,05 6o 2:6� ------------- (-60) 48.9/66:0 UV.-Ui 5 8. Z�K-7- (2-40 ')53.2/ . ......... ...... I114) 38.4/56.0 6V T N UJ \'o S P U a I I S! IN IW ' 1StADD 64e INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd ................. .................. ................. .................. SUBJECT PARCEL ................. .................. ................. .................. FIG. *3 City of eaganapproved L standard WATER plate PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENTI I114) 38.4/56.0 CC 64e 7 > 53.7? 72.0 INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd ................. .................. ................. .................. SUBJECT PARCEL ................. .................. ................. .................. FIG. *3 City of eaganapproved L standard WATER plate PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENTI L-'g G�b. 4" 48"' r--;.�1t---{ \� 15" t P-$ p 3 E -b 877 3 '6.3 &c �� <' ��'-'' I''.". `'• 886.0 '7.2 1 E -e a2" E_:d - - G E 2 7. E- f wAas -r'ap,;i»�, �.. i 85 5,.0 U11 1Ii( _GP -6 SII 866.0 GP -9 879.3 - « 1_ 'u 856.0 ` �`.�Lr^r=:Fr1 868.0 833.0 JP -16 '�'". �.K:STP pp --- - `i......... JP=33 874.7 J8580 *'.• ;i � 879./ JP -59 ! 2s :.832.0 871.0 8870 - JP -61 854.0 i 1 `' G c 42 864.0�"� f e.:P.`. . 879.7 ! "2 w.:� :..;.;.•. ;• JP8 6p ��2•, j r -� - Ir,IN`_. \ 'ts�=''• GP -7 1.2 ;.``:.�:., 1, ` ;:T 864.0 1- 887.0 JF=12. ; i`; r I JP -18 - 872.0 -" JP -41 L.S.-�j .826.0 ' Y'", ,�:' 8600 ti 885.3 ^^7T�� . 85.x.0 ' Y 871.0 rr� 887.0-67 876.3 j ,NI d 880.4 �': i 89.8840 0 T I GP -4 ti IQ IN. _ 21 , + : i8 74 883. h JP -15 3 0 a JP-58�874.0 2 882.0882 -•'1 - `- JP -30 f J_p i.._. JP -55 �- 873.0 JP -56 879.4 6 jp i / .......""'JP -54 .. 856.0 852.0 5 �6�� 8p 254 i �4.4 �,r y� J-0Rk 885.4 1 JP -21 L.S.-17 ". 8153 na _ c J/ . � n n a � � n,'ri �,-.� J P- 23 YORKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK 2nd SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. *1 city of eagan STORMS Siateard EMS- PUBLICEWER aPProved: P#: WORKS DEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN �'% CO --4 0 co m m .n. r' m 15 Ot ......... 0 iN N 611,10.111 A47 11 r, NTS :It z z 0 c 4 CL o1j, .n. r' m 15 Ot ......... 0 iN N 611,10.111 A47 11 r, NTS :It z z 0 c 4 CL CO z =4 CD m m co m z m n =i PM m -4 m m z m n q 0 OD IS lit m w f- rrs 7. o MEMO- :10 0 V;; z cr 1y` 0 0 z z CO N) =3 CL zjs ra ro IS lit m w f- rrs 7. o MEMO- :10 0 V;; z cr 1y` 0 0 z z CO N) =3 CL APC Minutes September 22, 1987 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted on grading plan. The financial guarantee shall not be released until one year after the date of installation. 3. If a shortage of parking is evident, the City may require parking lot expansion. Nineteen spaces shall be initially approved. 4. No mechanical units shall be visible from the residential property or from Scott Trail. 5. The development shall be responsible for the cost of the construction of the required storm sewer to convey the runoff from Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot B into the existing storm sewer system in Scott Trail when the outlet for Pond AP -50 is constructed. 6. The development shall be responsible for constructing its proposed entrance to Cliff Drive at this time. 7. The developer shall resolve the issue of preventing a thoroughfare between Scott Trail and Cliff Drive. All voted yes except Gustafson and Krisnik who voted no. YORKTON SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The last public hearing of the evening convened by Chairman Harrison was in regard to the application of Yorkton Limited, Inc. for preliminary plat consisting of 5 lots and one outlot on approximately 37.3 acres (Outlot A of Yorkton Industrial Park South) located in the east half of Section 13, east of Highway #149 and south of Becker Road. Mr. Runkle introduced the project, including the overall concept plan. Mr. Jim Kramer was present to answer questions on behalf of the developer. There was no one from the public to address the proposal. Member McCrea questioned the applicability of an EAW once the overall project exceeds 300,000 square feet. Mr. Runkle indicated that one building clearly did not result in the impact requiring an EAW and that the state was presently re -looking at the threshold process to consider impacts, rather than square footage determinations. Wilkins moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: APC Minutes September 22, 1987 1. All signage will be subject to the Sign Ordinance and the one-time fee of $2.50 per square feet. 2. Lots 1-5 shall have an office appearance from the adjacent roads. 3. No roof top mechanical equipment shall be visible from adjacent streets. 4. No exterior storage shall be allowed without separate conditional use permits. 5. The development shall be responsible for obtaining the appropriate approvals from MnDOT and Dakota County for proposed driveway locations. All voted yes. ADJOURNMENT Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 10:10 p.m. All voted yes. DGK Secretary - APC Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 VARIANCE TO CITY CODE/HIDDEN VALLEY ADDITION G. Variance to City Code, Hidden Valley Addition (Maximum Street Grade) --On April 21, 1987, the Hidden Valley Addition received preliminary plat approval by Council action. Condition # 8 indicated that the maximum street grade for the subdivision would be 8.0% in accordance with City Code. During the detailed final grading, utility and street plan preparation, the developer has indicated that compliance with this code requirement would necessitate substantial additional fill being imported to the site with considerable disturbance to the existing vegetation. Upon review of these final plans, the Engineering Division concurs with the developer's stated hardship. There have been instances where 10% street grades have been allowed subject to alternative secondary accesses being constructed at 8% or less. As can be seen by a copy of the final plat enclosed on page Z.3, a secondary access is being provided for future construction with the potential upgrading of Rocky Lane through the Skovdale #2 Addition. This would provide a secondary access at less than maximum street grade when it's costructed. Enclosed on page L---� 4 is a letter from the developer requesting a variance to the City Code and deletion of Condition # 8 from the development contract agreement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny a variance to City Code for Hidden Valley Addition (maximum street grade). F - U) 2 \\ 1L zV w N ti a - W z N / 1 O W z M ir a03 Li } Z.m ;� \ 31 � � Y _�,N.J �.r'. o wT / •�i\\} Iia I _ \ •. Q N to I- r N h W i Z to O > W oo•o '•' i Li ..Ir Z N Z LJ k cr = Z tL /� roi N�OpWy ? $/ a.io`•s°—a• _ _ J Im En LL 23 OQ / pro` , ,�Fi,, Ni, W z m H >� Q '�•uir.i')v — w�j P– UN) �I o o U)w 3 z W = , /! ♦ >el" s L _ •M.L9.G2.9'N 8I o z= o � -•` sl r f LUJ i.iii / \ \ \\\ii // �.�oP:+� �., •goo. � / � / / / " :n\ \`F. r \ �!r', .�.� `�F, W a •;�,• g.\ ars%.� 1 I J" /, .�` \ �. r� $�yss�+`�rrr ��.x '3 i :, y4- •, rY� / j e "' �I - o O51, r b/ ~ rIM � ��"F,r / AGN S\$•S \�= 9n.°° y '°% o I / / 'Ot'F0.Fi,, r `•\.\^ , _ J � a ,i ,+•nL_ — _ ul 'Ld ticX q`y GO'3GY ~'EE, :U.FF.00.D7+• r Ov0a BON51 ._ 10-Ild r , .r. .:... t �•: •, gni r.;� 26'rrt ! ;�It.. .... ..---•------ GRAHAM DEVELOPMENT CO. October 6, 1987 Mr. Thomas Colbert Director of Public Works CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RE: HIDDEN VALLEY Dear Mr. Colbert: 1000 SHELARD PARKWAY SUITE 270 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 TELEPHONE (612) 546-8216 it has come to our attention that there still remains, in the conditions of approval, a requirement for 8% maximum street grades. As we have discussed, adherence to this requirement renders the project im- possible, due to the lack of adequate fill. We understand that the 10% grades require a variance, and we hereby request such a variance. Sincerely yours, GRA' VELOPM T Thomas J. Graham President TJG:er Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 SPECIAL PERMIT/EAGAN INDUSTRIAL CENTER H. Special Permit for Mark Miller, Eagandale Industrial Center to Allow a Class II Restaurant --The City has received an application for a special permit for Mark Miller to locate a Lunch King Restaurant on Lot 3, Block 2, Eagandale Industrial Park. For additional information on this item, refert the Planning report, a copy is enclosed on pages �Z�2 through . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special permit for Mark Miller to allow a Lunch King on Lot 3, Block 2, Eagandale Industrial Park. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: LUNCH KING (MARK MILLER) LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 2, EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK EXISTING ZONING: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 20, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 14, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Lunch King for a special permit to grant the placement of a Class 2 restaurant in a light industrial area. PLANNER COMMENTS: The subject parcel is located near the intersection of Eagan Industrial Road and Eagandale Boulevard. (Please refer to enclosed exhibit). A special permit is required since Class 2 restaurants are not allowed in industrial zones pursuant to the Eagan City code. Lunch King is an on-site deli style lunch service, serving hot and cold sandwiches, salads, soups and beverages along with coffee and pastries. The facilities will include areas for dining and take-out as well as delivery. The principal purpose for locating at this site is to serve the Eagandale Business Campus which does not have restaurant services within close proximity. The applicant will be leasing approximately 1,000 square feet with store front facing the main road. Ample parking appears to exist for this facility. If this special permit is approved, all other applicable City ordinances shall apply. Enclose Exhibit e AREA LOCATION MAP FLOOR PLAN SITE LAK ROAD 201' CV O r 182' O N j N co I� 130' m !U1 oi - JOIN- by fe4►a14t Ale�wl /oC)o .5. 1= 6� - �ilvu— � (rie;t -tom �1►►� �� ,?ld�. 67 Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 VARIANCE/CARLOS AND MELODY MC KEE I. Variance for Carlos and Melody McKee at 3947 Beryl Road for 2' Side Yard Setback --The City has received an application for a variance from Carlos and Melody McKee requesting a two foot side yard variance for a dining room addition at 3947 Beryl Road. Enclosed on pages through -(-32-i s a copy of the Planning Department report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance for Carlos and Melody McKee to allow a 2' side yard variance for a dining room addition at 3947 Beryl Road. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC BEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: CITY OF EAGAN VARIANCE CARLOS & MELODY McKEE LOT 1, BLOCK 3, CEDAR GROVE #5 R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) OCTOBER 20, 1987 OCTOBER 14, 1987 PLANNING APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a 2' side yard variance for a dining room addition at 3947 Beryl Road. COMMENTS: The purpose for this variance is to allow a 131x14' dining room addition to be built 5' from the side property line. The existing dwelling unit is located 7' from the side property line. The variance, according to the applicant, will allow the dining room to be centered with the existing deck, concrete walk, and patio. If approved, this variance shall be subject to all applicable code requirements. � �o Ob! \ L \� ` , �^ •' � � \\ ck; 3$ 1+. OALw Ii21 60 r 1 • �•i� \ \ SITE IL ci Ci if • toy• \ \ �h �i \ 1 • �� a •ter � �.—.µ-�c.S LL 0 5, ,L. vtY 414 - O \ 1\ i 1 C. S � • rl LiV. b Y ;w.�s:rca N : 'I �' 9// r �� b � •vj :o� •� � �O � a"' � . • 111 \, �\ •T � `y4.J.• ��•• �'y �6'� LLJ W � rr cr sa�`v LZ'LaZ Oz/— - - - -- -Oz/- r _ r \ 1�'� �: •:oar all ui � vz/ ozI \ ,ow Mi / a1 -Z ^/Z.W.V s S'FLS — 75 •' //1 //)+ �/1! cl) I V ^'� •��' ENGINEERING, INC. Eryiicer-s Sur � -Cyors Mortgage Loan Survey for c.c� PROPOSED ADDITION �s lw ti Scar. 1--40' .7400�az W-l"+y Jed Dr-A1n4ge Eaeenrer7•f LOT,_BLOCK CEDAR -GROVE No. 5 DAKOTA COUNTY /t A+s ,i a It�e end �arrr/ rrprscrrlo�:x+ o te�rrry s''rNr ra.�?a- vc y •yr :�r�c+ ad+le J0l-J-f&d L►t/ A; Me .na!rm. �l Wyly !'rrr7, tJ7(r J" rr+rl�f CKl7R?L'><iry�I.f . v Irld, K�/7 a, Art We vA/. ? s %rvv i * ChAlp wj� I7 CVwrC?t'rp 0•11• 4 we"r2jr rat' .cr. diol :.nt l .n Mt p. qus�ly ad no ?w-,-jX & VV, ' .n.+n r+! a �rrri C: "r W3 r. 3LO rw wv4r3nnd wV agrrrri w aww-wentj hes- ern t*c d ,� bK 1pwllo.c .( esla6h/�M a.rs rr hxaxijry arnrrs Nrt� it?� / �. :�.v v % Ar lr% Su4v (AN mc. Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 VARIANCE/VIVIENNE JABAAY J. Variance for Vivienne Jabaay for a 10' Rear Yard Setback, Lake Park Shores --The City has received an application submitted by Vivian Jabaay requesting a variance to the ordinary high water mark of 908' for Thomas Lake on Lot 10, Block 1, Lake Park Shores Addition. Enclosed on pagesL3_4through 1,3(1P is a copy of the Planning Department report that addresses the variance as requested. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the 10' rear yard setback variance for Vivienne Jabaay for Lot 10, Block 1, Lake Park Shores to allow a house and attached garage to be constructed. (33 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: VIVIENNE L JABAAY LOCATION: LOT 10, BLOCK 1, LAKE PARK SHORES EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 20, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 14, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a variance to the OHWM (Ordinary High Water Mark) of 908' for Thomas Lake on Lot 10, Block 1, Lake Park Shores Addition. COMMENTS: The purpose for this variance is to allow a house and attached garage to be constructed in the Lake Park Shores Addition (recorded November 20, 1979). Platting of this Addition was done prior to the adoption of the Shoreland Zoning Ordinance. The proposed elevation of the dwelling unit is 917.5', finished garage floor elevation is 917.83. The proposed house would be at a distance of 33' from the OTWM and would meet all other setback requirements. If approved, this variance shall be subject to all applicable code requirements. 13q -•-.-lIO.0 cB9°3633-C ... .• IIS' _ _ o r,y �\ � /�I .• 3`1•'�\� I \ I/ER 19774ER141 /NOTO) f/�%-�`� I w 1 569°lfi 33 �C. II�,. \ ..• Y66R iR9°!6'!S'�.•.. ''S � - 'a' II'' - �12 e \\ I I I � „6 OUTLOT A ;� ! Alt 010.62 i.W 1 - ,� LOTn — !: �JJQ 1 30 00 B •"e�° BLOCK IRASMUSSEN � e J t � 26211 •',SURVEY ,•r r LINE '• a /fie` 0293° Ye' ADDITION x 1 SITE .. R=33.00 a 40 n I 30 30 P4 •I _ _ .= 8 9 0 -6`,•� STII6 ft• 1 •'*de b "y a6,� 14PyL� _ NII'Dt1 8 I.Ir.r s.•[. � ' •.'T •�- 41 010,63 I . r + P+ 7.'O •� - '.. 4x26 60 TJ" '•�•'- -_363-- _ : �9 10 7604 A "w m8, %0.�` �1200o g69�4zo6' 01p �= (]A` 5�°33'3fi'E I ICC.00���e_ r [Y 0 5 ` ' W' ` ^ � 8 YJ , 14321, • �_" 1• .+,1 � Iz�.� � p lil a gess 61�5°f I e �14,r r 6 69°12 Ofi•F .n� J 1 x� `•� d AIL) m D0 1 d A �i,. I `'�` � aw•UUllnt .. +` oot , v '+ tl oota tr t"u'm o 61� I \`` 8 o 8 2 o U _ JO �' ^ 371.9 14 1 ••,� 4+ 4 12000 ��A I 589°4206 E LL' +° O 5 .5Jl6r 6000 �P2• - 1 ��R �,J m ., 372 33 A:,e niW 19 51 • �+,� p -•'JJ e 6 OJO A: 'g7 � ,2�� o ape moo• 10 6000 'bon_ • p +�.ti• O.1-64 yy 4' .v 14 �•� •a-. to4 Iul e. 30 30 t � II e o n LOT 2, BLOCK l u tia I W =_ RASMUSSEN ADDITION cyJ °Je a2F°ey % m °o J :I torn F 256 60 M fOUNTY (PER NMT DOC NO 4652701 STATE (CLIFF ' ,�.,.. .BROAD AID,nl--- y n7i6 :, T/R0 F +•i660.12(RES.) l J J 261 C OMMAGE AND UT/C/TY EA.6VT Cj�;•07 DENOTES EVST/NG ELEV47WA/ ( 00 5) KNOW /WWW 6O ZVOKAT/DA/ ..a— /NO/Ca7-05 O/9EC7/ON OF SuRMCE G14L!/Nr+ 9/7" 03 = F/N/SHED FaARWE FLOOR 6W k47/oN SCAZZ : /^ = -:0' 3o' 051W 1UNIV6 9E704aC L/NE LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT /0 EILOCK /, LAKE pARj{ 5�'ES, DAKOTA CouNTY, M/n/NGSOTA SY Me 11 30 FOUNDATION PERMIT, GOPHER EAGAN 2ND ADDITION/CONSOLIDATED FRTWYS K. Foundation Permit, !?gher Eagan 2nd Additon/Consolidated Freightways --On page , the enclosed written request was received by staff regarding the footing and foundation permit issuance for the proposed Consolidated Freightways to be developed on Lot 3, Block 1 of the Gopher Eagan Industr al Park 2nd Addition as identified by the map enclosed on page 4 �. The developer is proceeding with the final plat application at the present time. However, there are several items and conditions that must be complied with before the final plat can be processed. It is anticipated that these items will be resolved with the formal final plat application being processed within the next 30 days. The referenced grading permit contained within this same request has been processed administratively subsequent to the preliminary plat approval by Council action on July 21st, 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the foundation/footing permit for Lot 3, Block 1, Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition (Consolidated Freightways). 3-� (612) 454-3310 RECEIVED CEP 2 x::37 GOPHER SMELTIHG & REFING CO. Manufacturers LEAD PRODUCTS 3385 So. Hwy. 149 Eagan, Minnesota 55121-2395 September 22, 1987 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road =- P.C. Box 21199 Eagan MN 55121 Dear Mayor and Council Members, We would like to request that at your next council meeting you approve a grading and foundation permit for the Consolidated Freightway terminal. This project is part of our final plat Gopher Eagan 2nd Addition.. This permit would allow us to get started while the weather is still good and we can get occupancy yet this year. We thank you in advance for your kind attention to this matter. We have appreciated your cooperation and assistance on this project and look forward to bringing it to a timely and successful completion. Sincerely, WK f cf . prmt X38 r Aqenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 REVISED SITE PLAN AND CONDITION/CUTTER'S RIDGE ADDITION L. Revised Site Plan and Condition for Cutters Ridge Addition -- Action was taken by the City Council during a regular meeting in August to approve a preliminary plat entitled Cutter's Ridge Addition with the understanding that the developer and adjacent property owner Mr. Jim Horne would agree to an alternative plan that would serve the Horne property in the north with a sixty foot right- of-way -- 30 feet that would be on the subject property. The staff is requesting that an additional condition be added to the Cutter's Ridge preliminary plat that reads as follows: The developer shall be responsible for the acquisition of an additional 30' of right-of-way on the adjacent property to the west for the north/south street connection to the Horne property to the north of this plat. Otherwise, Lot 1, Block shall be platted as an outlot. Enclosed on pages through L('Z is a staff memo and drawing indicating the reason for the additional condition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the site plan review/additional condition for Cutter's Ridge Addition. [40 MEMO TO: DALE RUNKLE FROM: JIM STURM DATE: OCTOBER 14, 1987 SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL CONDITION/SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CUTTERS RIDGE ADDITION This plat containing thirty-seven single-family lots was approved by the Advisory Planning Commission in July and by the City Council in August. Prior to the APC meeting, Mr. Jim Horne submitted an alternative plan to the City that would serve his property on the north with a 60' right-of-way --- 30' that would be on the subject property. The developer (Thomas Graham) agreed to this revised layout and this was the plan approved by the APC and Council. The developer will be requesting the final plat approval for this addition in the near future. The plans show the 30' dedicated half right-of-way along the western property line for the north/south connection to the Horne property, but the developer should also be responsible for the acquisition of an additional 30' of right-of-way on the adjacent property to the west. While working towards their final plat submission, the stovepipe lot along Pilot Knob Road has been eliminated --- thirty-six lots will now be in the first addition. The second addition, eleven - lot plat is scheduled for the APC on October 27, containing Outlot A of the first addition and the three acres to the south (Berkholtz property). This plat will pick up one lot. Therefore, the number of lots as originally planned for on the twenty acres will remain at forty-seven. Cutters Ridge Addition (additional condition): 1) The developer shall be responsible for the acquisition of an additional 30' of right-of-way on the adjacent property to the west for the north/south street connection to the Horne property to the north of this plat. Otherwise, Lot 1, Block 2 shall be platted as an outlot. Planner I JS/mc cc: Tom Colbert 14 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillip I.... IA A -:, - - .... &04' e L • 1 -FA y 1 �� �, ,f,��'/I:� .�i .;; A�• .��- _, -era ._ :. 1� :� �•' >: .__fix::• -,•, j^i �% :p, r r to :s�• %_ /• i� /_t'� ' ` -`t J_= 1 .�,f'/?t tLIFPFR3 FiOt �J� I-T ` tt �' ,�•� \, �•'•.:-/'�\)t•'�.`/,tff/.� �� ,• \ \ •�:_.�• _ •�!�i• t - .l. 5.? Imo`~~••`T• ��'1� � vo IN •li �= jJl �.'1, y '� 1 .tI yG •,. •titti. � 1 ! 1 � ••1 :� ;cG� ar Tj ce • 1 1 j 1.r1+. t 4'► • —' Il. t •tom \� '•� ' ! p V 1� Ilj{ }��; '*•J.i .- �• ��r , I� 1 I # t%• 1 •� ' II \• 1 •' .• rl • .\ x•- ��~.�/`.\•� ' • Y;I�•• � j+ � � is i�tl 1 _ 1 `•�•,' ��• .'.�\\'�f'`�— • ��. ��i •. n'.\'', %� �`i t• ♦\ :1 ' • ���tl � 1+ •I O / /S :l "�, i�\ �ri"k ��•: �..C; 1 ')' /') •moi • •t •. \ \ • ' ' , =.'' . 1'+i )!1: f• • • • • �� •L , • - __�� ��• \ \• , • L.� ��\ 1 I��:. •; .� �� •` � .;.•�•�:.1.�- - )•'I T `� •+ �. s \lam}--:\ �S. •t����I�YF�� .��`�\: . � •,•�% � / �.� � YI ' ,f �. is '� Y : , • t y b •:•/•'' :;: ��� .'.; � t• 1. a7-'�= '- i.•.a 1\I•r .• � :' .. ; .. •. - ._ = t .tom .-.�.. �'_ _ Maa..••.rasa.� / _ - /• CSA.KNO.J1v F-7-7. "V__ _ Vs. r�� �� _ Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 A I,TIONAL„I,TEIMS A. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS: Item 1. Project 87-32A, Consider Award of Contract, Country Club Market - Driveway --On October 6, formal bids were received for the installation of the driveway and landscaping improvements associated with Project 449R. Because the new public hearing was continued until October 20, the contract award consideration was also continued. Enclosed on page '? is a plan showing the proposed improvements under this contract. The lighter shading relates to the landscaping and curb improvements that were proposed to be the responsibility of the Country Club Market while the darker shading relates to the driveway extension improvements proposed as the responsibility of the Cedarvale Bowling Lane by the drive extension to Cedarvale Blvd. Country Club Market has objected to the requirement of installing landscaping in the boulevard area in front of the Rax restaurant but has agreed to proceed with the installation of all other related improvements (light shaded areas) privately. With the deletion of these landscaping improvements, the size of the proposed contract becomes relatively small. Subject to the action taken for Project 449R under Public Hearings of this agenda, this contract can be considered on its own merits. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny Contract 87- 32A, Country Club Market - driveways and landscaping, and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. II sr Zt .e t, 0 10 tr) 0 cr z 0 0 U oo+j I Ij II , a to cjw W ir 'i z w 0 D CL ,4:4 Ir W, ir 0 10 tr) 0 cr z 0 0 U oo+j I S-0 , to cjw W ir 'i z w 0 CL ,4:4 Ir W, ir 0 zoz < �-o 0 M1 Ti cjw W ir m WSJ uj (n >o > LLI ww>- cr it cr LF 0. V ( qjno jo. MOOG of ,Z 01 M1 Ti LF V ( Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 Item 2. Contract 87-32B, Consider Award of Contract, Braun Court - Streets --On October 6, formal bids were received for the installation of streets and storm sewer for the Braun Court improvements under Project 487R. Because the public hearing had been continued, the award of the contract was also continued until October 20. Based on the results of a neighborhood meeting held on October 14, the affected property owners have requested that this contract be denied and that new bids be solicited during the winter for construction to begin as soon as weather permits in the spring. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To reject the bids and deny the award of Contract 87-32B, Braun Court (Streets and Storm Sewer) and to authorize the readvertisement for bid solicitation to occur during the early part of 1988. Item 3. Contract 87-32D, Consider Award of Contract, Patrick Addition - Streets and Utilities --On October 6, formal bids were received to consider the installation of streets and utilities under Project 509. Because the public hearing for this project was continued until October 20, the formal consideration of contract award was similarly continued. Based on the disposition of the continued public hearing for Project 509 earlier on the agenda, appropriate consideration of this contract would be in order. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny Contract 87- 32D, Patrick Addition - streets and utilities, and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Item 4. Contract 87-40, Approve Plans/Authorized Ad for Bids, Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities -- On October 6, formal plans were presented to the Council for consideration of authorizing the advertisement for competitive bids for the installation of public improvements associated with Project 516. Because that public hearing was continued until October 20, - formal approval of these plans was similarly continued to the same meeting. Depending upon the disposition of the public hearing for Project 516, the approval of the plans and authorization to advertise for competitive bids should be acted on accordingly. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 87-40, Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2nd Addition - streets and utilities, and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on November 13, 1987. 3 Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 Item 5. Contract 87-37, Approve Change Order No. 1, Parkcliff 2nd Addition --On October 6, the Council received the bids and awarded the contract for the installation and extension of existing storm sewer facilities within the Parkcliff 2nd Addition. Subject to that contract award, the Engineering Division successfully negotiated a reduction in the contract amount of $4,067.50 which is being processed as a change order to the original contract award. With this change order, the estimated cost of construction based on bids is now $25,000 as compared to the $24,000 estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearings for this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 for Contract 87-37, Parkcliff 2nd Addition - storm sewer extensions, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Item 6. Contract 87-38, Receive Bids/Award Contract, Dallas Development 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities --On October 16, formal bids were received for the installation of improvements necessary to service the Dallas Development 2nd Addition. Enclosed on page * is a summary tabulation of the bids received with comparison to the feasibility report estimate presented at the public hearing. The bids will be reviewed ana checked for accuracy with a formal recommendation being provided by the Public Works Director at the October 20 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids and award/deny Contract 87-38, Dallas Development 2nd Addition - streets and utilities, and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. *SPECIAL NOTE: The summary tabulation was not available on Friday; therefore, it will be distributed with the Additional Information packet on Monday. 1� Agenda Information Memo October 20, 1987 Item 7. Contract 87-41, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids, St. Francis Woods 6th Addition - Streets and Utilities --On October 6, the formal public hearing was completed and the installation of public improvements to this subdivision was approved. The detailed plans and specifications have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their review for consideration of authorizing advertisement for competitive bids. The Public Works Director and consulting engineer will be available to review these detailed plans and answer any questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans for Contract 87-41, St. Francis Wood 6th Addition - streets and utilities, and order an ad for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on November 13, 1987. CONTRACT 87-30/CHANGE ORDER #1 - COUNTRY HOLLOW ADDITION Item 8. Contract 87-30, Approve Change Order #1 (Country Hollow Trunk Utilities) --The developer of the Country Hollow Addition has subsequently purchased additional land adjacent to this subdivision for future phase development. In order to facilitate this future development, it is necessary to extend additional trunk sanitary sewer within the Country Hollow. Addition to provide future service to these additional phase developments. Subsequently, a change order has been prepared to the existing contract to allow this additional work to occur at the existing contract unit prices. This will result in an additional cost of $21,917 which will be the responsibility of the trunk sanitary sewer fund financed through trunk area assessments of the existing and future phase developments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 87-30 (Country Hollow - Trunk Utilities) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: OCTOBER 15, 1987 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE PI" - Enclosed on pages_ through �/ is a copy of a Status Report from Dakota County for the Assisted Housing and Community Development Program. I-494 CORRIDOR STUDY The I-494 Corridor Study was completed in draft form and distributed to the participating communities last week. The City of Eagan was sent a copy for review and comment. Since the I-494 Corridor Study impacts our community, it seemed appropriate to provide a copy for review and consideration to the City Council. Please refer to a copy that is enclosed without page number for your review. MTC "OPT OUT" Enclosed on pages through 2 is a letter from Ed Kranz, Regional Transit Board Member that provides information and a copy of the legislation that considers the "Opt Out" option for metropolitan communities. A meeting is scheduled on Thursday, October 22 at 7:00 P.M. in the City of Rosemount to discuss the topic. The City Administrator is planning to attend and would like any input the City Council might provide at the meeting on Tuesday. Please refer to the let�er and attached legislation enclosed on pages �� through _` for your information. EAGAN STAGE DOOR PERFORMERS Enclosed on pages through are memos from the Director of Parks and Recreation entitled "Eagan Stage Door Performers" that provides information about the organization of a local community theatre -group. This item does not require any action by the City Council however, is enclosed as an informative item. PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT Enclosed on pages throughis a copy of the Protective Inspections Monthly Report for your review. rj�.04,) 4& City Administrator -- TLH/KF/af 1U A OTA COUNTY JL —WM Ai-- :ux� -a 4 �rsv MKA tea— m DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2496 - 145th STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4800 Serving People and Communities M E M O R A N D U TO: HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City Managers; Tom Novak, County Administrator; and Dakota County Planning Department FROM: Mark S. Ulfers, Executive Director SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: October 8, 1987 Enclosed is the September Status Report for all Assisted Housing Programs and Community Development Programs currently being operated in your community and a summary sheet for Dakota County. If you would like to also receive reports on other Dakota County communities, please call Lori Zierden of our staff. Enclosures "AN FOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" N Status Report for Dakota County** September, 1987 * + = Increase/- = Decrease ** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. 3 Amount of ASSISTED HOUSING Elderl-.= Famil-,,r Total (+/-)* Section 8 Existing: Certificates 423 1,139 1,562 - 3 Vouchers 21 160 181 +15 Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0 Section 8 New Construction 247 300 547 0 Low Rent Housing 380 182 562 0 235 Home 0 41 41 0 236 Rental 0 526 526 0 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,075 2,369 3,444 +12 Amount of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elder!v Family Commercial Total Increase MHFA Home Improvement Loan 33 151 0 184 3 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 63 76 0 139 0 MHFA Home Energy Loan 10 78 0 88 0 Rental Rehab 38 47 0 85 0 CDBG Rehab Loan 87 159 0 246 0 CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 20 0 21 0 MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0 312 Loan - Residential 4 15 0 19 0 312 Loan - Commercial/ Mixed Use N/A N/A 3 3 0 Weatherization 330 1,322 0 1,652 22 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 566 1,876 3 2,442 25 * + = Increase/- = Decrease ** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. 3 14 Status Report for the City of Eagan September, 1987 ASSISTED HOUSING Section 8 Existing: Certificates Vouchers Section 8 New Construction Low Rent Housing 236 Rental TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING Amount of Elderl%, Family Total + - 46 10 0 0 0 ALP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly MHFA Home Improvement Loan 2 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 CDBG Rehab Loan 1 Weatherization 5 0 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 12 * + = Increase/- = Decrease Z� 216 262 -1 69 79 +7 33 33 0 17 17 0 144 144 0 479 535 +6 Amount of Family Total Increase 10 12 0 3 6 0 7 8 0 4 5 0 62 67 0 86 98 0 October 8, 1987 Mr. Tom Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: This past June I notified you regarding recent transportation legislation that directly affects your community. For your con- venience I have included a copy of that letter with enclosures. The meeting scheduled for Thursday, October 22, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. in the City of Rosemount has been scheduled in response to interest on the topic from within your communities. Represen- tatives from the City of Plymouth, the Southwest Metropolitan Transit Commission (Eden Prairie, Chanhassen and Chaska) and the City of Shakopee will present a panel discussion on how their cities successfully dealt with transit problems within their com- munities. These communities have improved the level of transit service provided their residents without losing the regular route service to Minneapolis and St. Paul and they have not had to increase taxes for this service. I encourage you to attend this meeting in Rosemount as this may be the last opportunity your community has to design your own transit system. If I can be of further assistance to you on this matter, please contact me at 333-4500. Sincerely, f __ -- r Edward J. Kranz` Regional Transit Board Member N June 23, 1987 Mr. Tom Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: The cost of providing transit service to metropolitan communities has been discussed at various political levels over the last several years. Lack of service within communities like yours has been discussed in the past. Other than regular route services to downtown, transit service within your community is non-existent. Terms like "feathering" and "opt out" are words that have evolved and affect the cost of transit in your community as well as the type of transit your community may desire to see. As you know, the term "feathering" reduces the amount of property tax levied for transit in your community. "Opt out" is a term that permits your community to provide replacement service to the current MTC - provided service. I have included copies of the amount of tax levied on property in your community for transit. This also reflects the amount of "feathering". In 1984 your community submitted a letter of intent to "opt out" and as of this date your community has not taken steps to do so. Some communities in the metropolitan area have elected to "opt out" and have provided replacement service. These "opt out" com- munities have essentially restructured the type of service pro- vided their community. They have been able to do this by utilizing up to 90 percent of the property tax collected within their community to provide this service. No additional revenues were necessary. In all. cases .they have improved the level of transit service provided their residents without losing the regu- lar route service to Minneapolis or St. Paul. The reason they have been able to do this is very clear; it is because the property tax currently paid for transit in communities like yours totals much more than the amount of service received. This was the purpose of the "feathering" legislation. Recent legislation, copy enclosed, has put a sunset provision on your ability to "opt out". You must submit an application to "opt out" by July 1, 1988 if your community desires to pursue this venture. Prior to this legislation there was no deadline. Considering the amount of tax your community is paying for tran- sit, you may want to look into this issue. A June 23 , 1987 Page 2 I would encourage you to contact the City of Plymouth, the South- west Metropolitan Transit Commission (Eden Prairie, Chanhassen and Chaska) or the City of Shakopee and review how they have addressed transit in their communities. I would be happy to assist you in setting up a meeting with representatives of these communities and regional transit board staff planners if you are interested. I have enclosed information on the topic that may be of interest to you. If I can assist you in this matter, please contact rue at 333-4500. Sincerely, Edward J. Kranz Regional Transit Board Member H.F. No. 1043 1 council may approve or disapprove in whole or in part. The 2 council may disapprove only for inconsistency with the policy 3 plan of the council. 4 Sec. 16. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 473.388, 5 subdivision 2, is amended to read: 6 Subd. 2. (REPLACEMENT SERVICE; ELIGIBILITY.) The transit 7 board may provide assistance under the program to a statutory or 8 home rule cha=ter city or town or combination thereof, that: 9 (a) is located in the metropolitan transit taxing district; 10 (b) is not served by the transit commission or is served 11 only with transit commission bus routes which begin or end 12 within the applying city or town or combination thereof; and 13 (c) has fewer than four scheduled runs of metropolitan 14 transit commission bus service during off-peak hours defined in 15 section 473.408, subdivision 1. 16 Eligible cities or towns or combinations thereof may apply 17 on behalf of a transit operator with whom they propose to 18 contract for service. 19 The board may not provide assistance under this section to 20 a statutory or home rule charter city or town unless the city or 21 town, 22 (iL was receiving assistance under Minnesota Statutes 1982, 23 section 174.265 er �j July 1, 1984, 24 JLLL had submitted an application for assistance under that 25 section by Julr 1, 19@4, or 26 tiii) had submitted a letter of intent to apply for 27 assistance under that section by July 1, 1984, and submits an 28 aa.lication for assistance under this section by Jul 1, 1988. 29 A statutory or home rule charter city or town has an additional 30 twelve month extension if it has notified the board before.July 31 1, 1988, that the cit✓ or town is in the process of completino a 32 transnortation evaluation study that includes an assessment of 33 the local transit needs of the city or town. 34 Sec. 17. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 473.39, 35 subdivision 1, is amended to read: 36 Subdivision 1. (GENERAL AUTHORITY.) The council, if REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD SCHEDULE OF 1986/87 TAXES BY OPT -OUT COMMUNITY EXISTING OPT -OUT PROGRAMS Shakopee $ 299,601 1986/87 TAXES $ 229,382 Plymouth Gross Tax Less Feathering Net Tax_ OPT -OUT COMMUNITY 951,808 237,162 714,646 Apple Valley $ 534,989 $ 129,017 $ 405,972 Burnsville 1,099,736 265,210 834,526 Eagan 781,351 188,429 592,922 Lilydale 23,371 5,636 17,735 Maple Grove 562,997 140,282 422,715 Medicine Lake 12,690 3,162 9,528 Mendota 3,902 941 2,961 Prior Lake 212,544 49,815 162,729 Rosemount 127,514 30,751 96,763 Savage 124,309 29,135 95,174 Subtotal $3,483,403 $ 842,378 $2,641,025 EXISTING OPT -OUT PROGRAMS Shakopee $ 299,601 $ 70,219 $ 229,382 Plymouth 1,196,113 198,690 997,423 Eden Prairie 951,808 237,162 714,646 Chanhassen 182,414 27,226 155,188 Chaska 165,285 37,004 128,281 Subtotal $2,795,221 $ 570,301 $2,224,920 TOTAL $6,278,624 $1?412,679 $4,865,945 Based upon estimates prepared by the Regional Transit Board November 17, 1987 MF0004 RTBTXI of OPT -OUT COMMUNITIES The following communities are under contract to the RTB to provide replacement service: - Shakopee - Plymouth - Eden Prairie, Chanhassen, Chaska (joint powers authority formed under the name: Southwest Metropolitan Transit Commission) The following communities have submitted letters of intent to opt -out but have not taken the next step: completing a transit study and submitting an application to the RT8. - Apple Valley - Burnsville - Eagan - Lillydale - Maple Grove - Medicine Lake - Mendota - Prior Lake - Rosemount - Savage V G0 MEMORANDUM / TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION lk I' DATE: OCTOBER 5, 1987 SUBJECT: EAGAN STAGEDOOR PERFORMERS Tom, attached is a memorandum from Dorothy Peterson requesting the placement of a Fund Raising Board on City property, and more specifically, the Fire Administration building. Background The Stage Door Performers are a group of Eagan citizens who have recently been formed as a theatre and performing group. This department was somewhat instrumental in starting this group, by hosting several informational and organizational meetings of those interested in the performing arts. The group has come together rather quickly, and I might add, have organized themselves much faster than we had anticipated. They already have a Board of Directors, Artistic Director, chosen and named, and have performed some skits for our department at Trapp Farm Park, in late August. They are indeed a very ambitious and hard working group and a "neat" addition to our community. This department continues to assist the Eagan Stage Door Performers by providing them with guidance and expertise, as well as a shelter facility for their meetings, etc. As the group continues to mature, our help will continue to lessen, as it has already the last several months. Nonetheless, they still need our support and assistance during this initial phase of their development and growing as a group. Obviously, the community. theatre group - E.S.P. are in need of some capital funds. They have already embarked upon a few fund raising events, one of which will be the rental of adult costumes for Halloween. These costumes were given to them by the now defunct West St.Paul Community Theatre group, and are being stored at an Eagan residence. These funds will be utilized for their future performances, but obviously will not be sufficient to sustain them. Therefore, they are seeking a fund raising effort within the community for the solicitation of cash donations. They wish to recognize those donations through and fund raising board, as outlined in Dorothy's memo. I would have no objections to this, and in fact would endorse this concept, but would request the approval of yourself and/or the Council for this effort. KV/bls !I C MEMO TO: DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION, VRAA FROM: RECREATION SUPERVISOR, PETERSON V DATE: OCTOBER 1, 1987 RE: EAGAN STAGEDOOR PERFORMERS, CAPITAL FUND DRIVE Now that the Eagan Stagedoor Performers are in the process of solidifying their non-profit tax exempt status, the board wishes to proceed with a capital fund drive. A mailing is being prepared. The Stagedoor Performers identify who they are, announce their intent to stage a late winter production and indicate that a budget of approximately $10,000 is required for successful realization of that goal. Ellen Franz, E.S.P. Board President, has requested the City's assistance during this capital drive. As a technique to inform the community of the group's existence and of the drive, Ms. Franz proposes a "take -off" on the United Way method of demonstrating progress in fund raising. She proposes using the Parks & Recreation logo on a large "board". The trunk of the tree would be colored in as funds are received. To be effective, the board should be placed adjacent to a heavily travelled street. Ms. Franz has inquired whether City property could be used for placement of the board - either at City Hall or the Fire Administration Building. I am requesting that approval be sought for placement of Eagan Stagedoor Performers capital fund drive board adjacent to Pilot Knob Road on Fire Administration Building property. DP/js PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - SEPTEMBER 1987 .FIBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Electrical 133 1,500 Plumbing 73 884 HVAC 114 1,109 Water Softener 155 Signs 15 103 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 6 13 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED YTD MONTHLY TYPE I NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 17 FOUNDATION 4 $ 60.00 60.50 529 SINGLE FAMILY 57 $ 5,558,000 27,976.00 $ 13,934.00 141,703.50 44 DUPLEX 2 110,000 692.00 346.00 4,497.00 88 TOWNHOUSE 0 3 CONDO 0 8 APT BLDGS 0 0 AGRICULTURAL 0 27 COMMERCIAL 2 3,018,000 8,136.00 4,068.00 40,719.00 88 COMM/IND REMODEL 9 163,700 1,295.60 538.05 1;917.65 7 COMM/IND ADDITION 1 153,000 662.50 331.25 1,070.25 1 INDUSTRIAL 1 535,000 1,799.75 900.00 2,967.25 0 INSTITUTIONAL 0 5 PUBLIC FACILITIES 3 5,590,000 13,930.50 6,965.25 82,423.75 41 RES. GARAGES 9 44,470 609.00 60.75 700.75 29 RES. ADDITIONS 3 41,000 357.50 139.00 518.50 16 SWIM POOL 245 MISCELLANEOUS 34 291,360 2,632.70 64.25 2912-20 2 DEMOLISH 2 HOUSE MOVES 1 ADJUSTMENTS 1,153 TOTALS 125 15,504,530 , 58,151.55 27,346.55 279,490.35 YEAR-TO-DATE 133,003,366 536,331.53 254,334.90 3,322,263.43 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE SEPTEMBER 1987 MM.TT-FAMTT.T RRFAYbnWN TYPE MO. # OF PERMITS MO. # OF BUILDINGS YTD # OF BUILDINGS MO. # OF UNITS YTD. # OF UBITS # OF PERMITS1 VOIDED # OF UNITS MOVED I DUPLEX 2 1 .22 2 44 3-PLEX 4-PLEX 19 76 5 -PLEB 1 5 6-PLEX 2 12 7-PLEX 8-PLEX 10-PLEX 12-PLEX 16-PLEX 3 48 APT. BLDG. 8 160 OTHER i t TOTAL: 2 f 1 55 2 ! I 345 � i 5 :jjF� H' O m O A x w O-. a z 0 H H A H H H H a' a a a a a a a A 3 3 ❑ aWo aa. U 3 W W A z z z z z z z z z U W W W w z z d H H H H H H H H H O w. z z z A E z E E E W W 44 z O O O OO O O O O O O O W a 04 H U U v U U U U U U U U U W Lr) Ln Le) N V1 Ln V1 Lr) u1 V1 V1 V'1 O O O O C4 r` N r- N N r• N N 00 v'1 N N in p O O W O N O M . i H O O -4 r- NO ON 00 C O N -e �O Ur1 V1 O N N N E r 00 �p r- N M n r-4 H�O M y Lr) Lr, Lr, p in ir, V) in V) Lr, Lr) in wry N n N O r� N N N 00 N N 'Z, V]CN r -r •7 O 00 O+ .-a u 1 �O M Op �t c:4 00 M M 00 V1 Lr) t` W M M N m r- M M O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 H u') Lr) L r Ull Lr) u) ON r Lr) Ln Ln Lr) O N H - 00 M 00 C r 00 N O N n CO r-+ V1 00 r- N N ON V1 n % n 14 O V) N Lr) � %0 V1 W w n �0 v) r -d ID %0 .-a Cl) M -4 .-4 a w N 1-4 - O 0 O O O O O O O O o O O O O O Z o o O O O O O O O o O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln O O O V1 H ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ H O O O^ Lr a0 C M .-a r�^ V1 O+ V1 �t N N^ � N r -I -4 N 04 V1 .t �p -4 a a.' tr1 N W dH H OU cn cn rn H F H o z w w x w U) U as w o = z z ¢ a W E -H U H Pq U rn H H F H W cn Pr A z a4 a a4 z co cn cn d 3 >4 - A x x U c� H o 0 o a o > > > O a U V U d > U U V w h z z z d H H H F > rn x z x U w co � ��" O .1 H A z U U p a LD d . a ❑ ❑ A hd v a 3 o P4 04 Aw rz-r r, 0 0 E-4 w M a � W cA U x Q W a N V ¢ N N N U ❑ a o Z* 44: z4: w z z F H U x A(Y 0 O H 0 >4 W AG x 3L 0 w N ;Dcn a 3 0 00 a. a. P4 W z z a � A cn .-+ a rx 04 cn ❑ s ❑ ❑ ❑ o H H H W H a AU A U A U A O w 0 a A a L a A H o2f ❑ H ❑ W A H W v] a o F R. W W o o A 13 ❑ A A �& lYa W P: u� 0. O z A 14 p4 U U a o 04 O 04 O o 3 z d z d z d W W cn >4z>¢E4rnLno H U - w EnoA d W H W F H H 3> A O w w;DwWHwLn 0404 a z cnuu d Uuuu d d U04a zdW ^� aA7 0.❑1W� rz .a w a A. 0 3 ^ w ;D w A o ^ 04W a. W a. w ¢ w W P4 c) PP U as U M A ^ A W WU ?+ O �4 z .7 0% 04 W cx u z d d d A- A f=. • w W ^ 3 Fq U ^ O r� Un O^ o -0 - d -0 -0 ^ o ^ O -0 O d H H H '-4 W H x W a .-+ M= UN U CV U N W .-r U r-+ U r-4 U� U� A W A A ❑ Pa 3 PQ ^ Gq Fq Cq 1 ^ Pq CA Pq Pa Pa PCI W P7 .-4 H O V'l N O O O O O O O O O ^ O O Ln ^ 'O V1 V1 ^ O ^ N 00 ^ 00 -00 ^ O ^ O ^ ^ ON - OS r- N O�4 r� r- -%t •-+ CO 0 Ln -4 CN -4 n O M N M N M N �p �4 V1 H M S M�4 M-4• o O m a N .4 Ln .a N .-7 M .-41-4.4 .-4 a -+ .4 N a h a M a M H H O O N N O, N r- O .--r 00 M �t M N M O% U' = A R'+ - '-4 N 1-4 .-r O N O IO ti M .-4 -4 M %04 � 00 N N V1 N -t It 1t 7' It �t -It .--r 't 4 .--1 .t ri 1-4 N .t N .t ap a H H -1 H -4 1-4 H ..a H -4 -4 -4 .� it r PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH Building 168 Elect-'--' 13R Plumt HVAC Water Signs Well, SEPTEMBER 1986 YEAR -TG -DATE 1,298 t ALh NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED YTD MONTHLY --m DCDLTT CCC or Am urru LTC TnTAr_ FFF_C 6 FOUNDATION 0 749 SINGLE FAMILY 86 $ 6,601,000 $r 31,142.00 $ 15,540.50 185,106.00 28 DUPLEX 0 201 TOWNHOUSE 44 2,800,000 16,080.00 8,040.00 119,340.00 9 CONDO 0 1 APT BLDGS' 0 0 AGRICULTURAL 0 18 COMMERCIAL 1 250,000 808.00 404.00 4,116.00 64 COMM/IND REMODEL 18 1,168,195 4,376.50 1,970.00 •9,857.00 5 COMM/IND ADDITION 1 40,000 238.Oc 119.00 377.00 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 INSTITUTIONAL 0 10 PUBLIC FACILITIES 0 27 RES. GARAGES 4 27,300 '250.00 267.00 21 RES. ADDITIONS 2 27,856 209.00 64.25 287.25 19 1 SWIM POOL 1 16,000 116.50 58.25 182.75 137 MISCELLANEOUS 10 36,300 406.00 429.50 1 DEMOLISH 1 15.00 15.00 2 HOUSE MOVES 0 1,2981TOTS 168 10,966,651 53,641.00 28,196.00 319,977.50 YEAR-TO-DATE 128,852,731 506,153.00 246,840.95 3,214,146.95 it / 60 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLI REPORT DATE SEPTEMBER 1986 MOLTT-FAMILT BREAKDOWN TIPE / OF PERMITS # OF # OF BUILDINGS UNITS VALUATION PERMIT FEES SURCHARGE PLAN REVIEW FEES TOTAL FEES 3-PLEX PERMIT f ADDRESS 8 LEGAL OWNER VALUATION FEE SURCHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES 4-PLEX 40 10 40 $1,920,000 $10,960 $ 960.00 $5,480 $ 80,780 6-PLEX COMM NEW L45 6 B2 EAG CTR PK.3 -PLEX _ 12595 905 YANKEE DOODLE RD 8-PLEX L 1 B 1 EAG CTR PK 5 SNYDER'S DRUG 25,000 170.50 4 2 20 880,000 5,120 440.00 2,560 38,540 44 12 60 2,800,000 16,080 1,400.00 8,040 119,320 TOTALS 10,000 80.50 5.00 40.2 125.75 COMM IMP 12642 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL 8 INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN BLDG PERMIT STATE IPLAN REV PERMIT f ADDRESS 8 LEGAL OWNER VALUATION FEE SURCHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUP. 12611 855 APOLLO ROAD NAT'L MINERAL $ 250,000 $ 808.00 $ 125.00 $ 4o4.oc $ 4,116.00 COMM NEW L45 6 B2 EAG CTR PK.3 _ 12595 905 YANKEE DOODLE RD L 1 B 1 EAG CTR PK 5 SNYDER'S DRUG 25,000 170.50 12.50 85.25 268.25 COMM REM 1284 TOWN CENTRE DR 12564 L 2 B 1 TOWN CTR 70 2Nf FEDERAL LAND 10,000 80.50 5.00 40.2 125.75 COMM IMP 12642 2020 SILVER BELL RD L 1 B 1 DALLAS DEVEL DALLAS DEVEL 46,000 265.00 23.00 132.50 420.50 COMM IMP 1720 ALEXANDER RD 12618 L 1, B 1, R.L.JOHNSON 1 R.L. JOHNSON 404,050 1,195.50 202.50. 597.75 1,995.75 COMM IMP 00 YANKEE DOODLE RD 12601 L 1, B 1, TOWN CTR 100 FEDERAL LAND 10,000 80.50 5.00 40.25 125.75 COMM IMP 12602 1380 DUCKWOOD DR LITTLE CAESAR 35,000 215.50 17.50 107.7 340.75 COMM IMP L 1 B 1 EAG CONV CTR 12596 1380 DUCKWOOD DR G.N.W. INC 16,000 116.50 8.00 58.2_ 182.75 COMM IMP L 1 B 1 EAC CONV CTR 12652 DUCKWOOD DR AMERICAN CONC TS 180,000 l OVU) 633.00 90.00 316.5 3,963.50 COMM IMP L I L , , B 1, EAC �ONV CTR 12673 D EST E NAT'L BUSINES: L 18-20, B 5, EAG CTR INI SYSTEMS $ 400,000 $ 1,183.00 $ 200.00 $ 591.50 $ 1,974.5 COMM IMP. 1284 TOWN CENTRE DR 12565 L 2, B 1, TOWN CTR 70 2N FEDERAL LAND 1,345 23.50 1.00 24.50 COMM IMP 12590 1284 TOWN CTR DR L 2, B 1, TOWN CTR 70 2N FEDERAL LAND 2,500 38.50 1.50 40.50 COMM IMP' 12594 1981 112 SILVER BELL RD L 1, B 1, SILVER BELL CT. METRAM PROPERTIES 7,000 _ _ 62.50 3.50 66.00 COMM IMP 12649 1279 CORP CTR DR GLASS STEEL 4,000 44.50 2.00 - 46.50 COMM IMP L 142, B 3 EAC CTR PK 1 12646 2955 LAN OAK CIR EAGANDALE 8,500 74.50 4.50 - 79.00 COMM IMP L 063, B 00, EAG _CTR2 _ PK PARTNERSHIP' 1282 TOWN CTR DR 12697 L 2, B 1, TOWN CTR 70 2N FEDERAL LAND 1,000 17.50 .50 - 18.00 COMM IMP 12695 2020 SILVER BELL RD L 1 B 1 DALLAS DEVEL DALLAS DEVEL 3,500 44.50 2.00 46.50 COMH IMP 12653 2600 EAGAN WOODS DR 12,300 98.50 6.50 COMM IMP L 1' EACAN.WOQDS_OF TRAMMELL CROW _05.00 12668 3970 SIB MEM HWY SECT 19 U.S. SWIM/FITN'SS $ 2,000 $ 32.50 1.00 --- S 33.50 COMM IMP 12607 1424 YANKEE DOODLE RD P.F. INC 40,000 20.00_ 119.00 377.00 COMM ADD L 1 B 238.00 Y 117