The URL can be used to link to this page

09/15/1987 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 15, 1987 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) -p.1 II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) p.( III. 6:40 - TAR ABATEMENT - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE (BLUE) 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Reconsider Condition of Plat Approval, FIRE DEPARTMENT Action to Amend Number of Firefighters POLICE DEPARTMENT Hills of Stone Bridge Contract for Radio Communication Equipment, Receive Bids/Award Contract V. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (ORCHID) •� A. PERSONNEL ITEMS B. PROCLAMATION, National Business Women's Week II �tf,,rC. 1 -DAY CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY/GAMBLING LICENSES, St. John Neumann Church .?f D. OFF -SALE BEER & CIGARETTE LICENSES, Tom Thumb, 4130 Blackhawk Road T ,/( E. COLLECTION, Household Hazardous Waste .13 F. FINAL PLAT, Hills of Stone Bridge Addition ./`,5 G. FINAL PLAT, Bridle Ridge Addition T .ZD H. ��FINAL PLAT, Blackhawk Acres 2nd Addition Z I. FINAL PLAT, Kinder Care Addition J. FINAL PLAT, Praise Lutheran Church Addition 2_(o K. FINAL PLAT, Brittany 10th Addition L. UNISYS LEASE AGREEMENT, Sperry Reservoir Antenna �p•Z$�M. PROJECT 517, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing, St. I a Francis Woods 6th Addition �.Z b N. PROJECT 520, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report, Yorktown 2nd Addition - Storm Sewer 0. Project 518, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report, Eagan High School Addition VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) 7 % A. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Delinquent Utility Bills B. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 490, Woodgate Lane .{o C. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 477, Windtree 7th Addition D. EXCAVATION PERMIT, Gopher Smelting f d E. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 475, Daniel Drive F. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 482, Nancy Circle G. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 467, Wescott Road H. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 460A, South Nicols Road .20 I. PUBLIC HEARING, Project 512, Cutter's Ridge - Utilities (To be 1 Continued to October 6, 1987) Z( J. VACATION, Utility Easements, Blackhawk Acres Addition .Z.miK. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 442, UPS 1st Addition 7,ZI L. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Wedgewood Add (Lexington South Assoc Agreemt) M. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 443, Parcels 10-01000-010-77 and 10-01000-010-56 (Robert O'Neil - Storm Sewer) N. PUBLIC HEARING, Proposed 1988 General Fund Operating Budget VII. OLD BUSINESS (PINK) -P-1 A. Knob Hill of Eagan Homeowner's Association (continued from 8/18/87) ( B. VARIANCE, James Del Greco, 12' Sideyard Variance, 4243 Sequoia Drive VIII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) -p.( A. VARIANCE, Dennis Boldt, 10' Rear Yard Setback Variance at 2103 Garnet Lane �•� B. WAIVER OF PLAT, Kenneth Wason, Duplex Lot Split, 773 & 775 Cougar Drive n . , C. SPECIAL PERMIT, Fairview Development Company, Temporary 8' X 201, Construction Sign, Lot 2, Block 1, Proposed Pondview PD T, (t D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Haven Enterprises, Inc., To Allow Automotive Service in a NB (Neighborhood Business ) District, Blackhawk Plaza at NE Corner of Blackhawk Road and County Road 30 �.z ( E. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Robert Engstrom Associates, Inc., Dodd Farm Addition, Consisting of 7 Lots on 3.0 Acres, West Side of Dodd Road/ North of Golden Meadow Road P.3 F. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, Meritor Development Company, Blackhawk Park PD PRELIMINARY PLAT, Blackhawk Ridge Addition, Consisting of 64 Single - Family Lots on 32.4 Acres VARIANCE, For Cul De Sac in Excess of 500 Feet, South of Blackhawk Hills Road/North of Blackhawk Lake P.`j 3 G. REZONING, Richard Land Associates, St. Francis Wood 6th Addition, 20.96 Acres from R-4 (Multiple) to R-1 (Single Family) PRELIMINARY PLAT, 34 Lots, South of Duckwood Drive/West of Lexington Avenue �•7 T H. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, Austin Companies, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Pylon Sign PRELIMINARY PLAT, 1.83 Acres for Automotive Service Center on LB (Limited Business) Land within Cedar Cliff Commercial Park PD, North of GGCliff Road/Between Cliff Drive and Scott Trail -p•7`¢ I. REZONING, Cliff Plaza Partnership, Galaxie Cliff Plaza Addition, 26 A (Agricultural) Acres to LB (Limited Business) PRELIMINARY PLAT, One 4.4 Acre Lot Containing an Office Building, South of Cliff/West of Galaxie Avenue/East of I -35E 1(0 J. FOUNDATION PERMIT REQUEST, R&B Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 11Z- K. Refunding Request for the LeMay Lake Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds L. EAW Review for Cliff Lake Galleria & Towers Project_ IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) A. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT: 1. Contract 87-32, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Braun Court, Chapel Hill, Country Club Market, Patrick Addition n. 2 2. Contract 87-37, Receive Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Dallas Development 2nd Addition/Kennebec Drive) �J 3. Contract 87-20, Approve Lease/Easement Agreement (E -Z Air Park Storm 1 Sewer X. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) XI. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) XII. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1987 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval is given to the September 15, 1987 agenda, and regular City Council meeting minutes for September 1, 1987, the following items are in order for consideration: LTAXABATEMENT —DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S. -OFFICE The City has received a request from the Dakota County Assessor's office to consider a tax abatement for the George and Miriam Nall property. For a copy of the property location, refer to page _7,,--. According to the Assessor's office it was discovered that the square footage had a calculation error of 351 square feet. Therefore, the 1986 estimated market value should be reduced from $84,900 to $78,200. By reducing the market value the assessed value is reduced from $17,272 to $15,396. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the tax abatement for George and Miriam Nall as recommended by the Dakota County Assessor's office. 2624 se nes •'i-. _ Doc 95W .�� No � _ �I-j�GHWAY�cox• =:.�°y: � r 54031 47781 -- 471 - •9s Do I wesT . 255 i'" .ES' a, Z f 1659. 2,65 o 7 ne I jT V W O Z _ — DD 9 12 ,. _ 2 v HEMLOCK o 16 y _ 7 929 N9932 w _1'. E•9r� CIRCLE '3D b - �P 4`2 o �~ !� A. 265 00 '= Q 30 '961• NP2°y p1 a 1211• 1505.8 133 29 13 • `ll 75: EAST iNP9°4}W 30 r 13 _ la~Iz IS Cc 14i I 13 g ,.2 51 1. :y> op'O i 15 c - ~ 1 ��/// � 39:`9'E -o 07 •2'2j E� ' 14 1399 i)S , SURVEY LINE - E6S1 N 0. 'u` - 10 Ile 200 2A as 3 40 110 'n-.7132 255 po N 14 ? = II 10 •I EAST� I.. � o Ev+ 12T BS 23'24"F O•'_v. j� j IS n S6o° •'9 _ 7 : _~ NP2°Ot 24 E JOU• 10 6. bte 2i 21 b:63°.. a> '�•' F6 TI 22 B ^� �'?9 17 c' m 9 F`♦ 1 3'•32j• 1 E65T 219 32 — TRAILWAYM y2ro^ a , ec 21 39 32'r . - -4; aY4.. • •74 9: IB !9 / r 20 POND W �' •'i-. � O Z ,113 1YJ zssW a, Z L n' (� N R-ep -.1. j o 7 ne I jT V W O Z _ — DD 9 12 ,. _ 2 v HEMLOCK lJI _ 7 929 N9932 w _1'. E•9r� CIRCLE '3D b 9.3 4`2 o �~ !� - '= Q 30 '961• NP2°y p1 a 1211• 1505.8 133 29 13 • `ll 75: EAST iNP9°4}W 30 r 13 _ la~Iz IS Cc 14i I 13 g ,.2 51 1. :y> op'O - ~ 1 ��/// � 39:`9'E -o 07 •2'2j E� ' 14 1399 i)S SIGFRID • 6 s el~ II 0 46393-- 23'24"F O•'_v. j� j IS n S6o° •'9 _ 7 : _~ NP2°Ot 24 E JOU• 10 6. bte 2i 21 b:63°.. a> '�•' F6 TI 22 B ^� �'?9 17 c' m 9 F`♦ 1 3'•32j• 1 E65T 219 32 — TRAILWAYM y2ro^ a , ec 21 39 32'r . - -4; aY4.. • •74 9: IB !9 / r 20 POND W �' 2c 19 I 110 110 Ll 22 10 9 0i 1: •f.,ta.. W I i :•:.ti;:;:Y: - - : -tiff•: 3 `:••fes:}.: ;; ••'• { ; ° - •23'c •-60 S.°°.612 W 5 o c? n I •�°= 2 0 -- NR9°•3W-� 3D 3.3 13'1 p - B ! N19°43W ~`IP!` N99°43'Wpl'° I j: I I Ic Ib 1_ N99°43'W -- B ' Q 4!2�� TAX ABATEMENT: George & Miriam Nall 10-24880-040-01 N -I? s '30 12746 !30 p � - 7 _ 5 a: 1 - 9 ^ o 7 ne I NP9°.! W NP9°43 W 14fi 2F ;3D 9 3 - °i •5' s O e 3 P4 2' 2 v HEMLOCK _ 7 929 N9932 w CIRCLE 9.3 � Iz 1505.8 133 29 ,13 9- 100 iNP9°4}W r 13 _ la~Iz IS Cc 14i I ,.2 51 1. BGLSAM 2c 19 I 110 110 Ll 22 10 9 0i 1: •f.,ta.. W I i :•:.ti;:;:Y: - - : -tiff•: 3 `:••fes:}.: ;; ••'• { ; ° - •23'c •-60 S.°°.612 W 5 o c? n I •�°= 2 0 -- NR9°•3W-� 3D 3.3 13'1 p - B ! N19°43W ~`IP!` N99°43'Wpl'° I j: I I Ic Ib 1_ N99°43'W -- B ' Q 4!2�� TAX ABATEMENT: George & Miriam Nall 10-24880-040-01 N -I? s '30 o B 0 p � - 7 _ 5 2 4 NR9043'W 3 2 v 9 t o yo 1 d U st-- STREET IPD M94^•y W C�! YP9°4. W 9 10 0. 6 5 •9Y43 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 A. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT: Item 1. Reconsider Condition of Plat Approval, Hills of Stone Bridge --On March 17, 1987, the Council approved the preliminary plat of Hills of Stone Bridge with several conditions. Because of the concern of increased drainage from a portion of this development on downstream ponding areas (GP -7), Condition #5 required the installation of an outlet and related storm sewer facilities to be authorized by Council action through the completion of the public h ring process prior to final plat approval. Enclosed on page __ is a location map referencing Pond GP -7 in relationship to the thirty plus acres of the Hills of Stone Bridge that would drain into this drainage basin. While the developer has only recently petitioned for these improvements, the required public hearing process cannot be completed until November 1987 at the earliest. Enclosed on page ,� is a letter from the developer requesting reconsideration of this plat condition to allow them to proceed with final plat approval prior to the completion of this public hearing process. In response to staff's concern regarding development prior to these downstream storm sewer facilities being autho ized, the developer has provided the letter enclosed on page __ and indicated a C willingness to enter into an agreement with the ity, holding the City harmless from any problems that might arise in the interim. If this condition is revised as requested, the final plat scheduled under the consent agenda is in order for favorable consideration. However, if this request is not approved, the final plat will have to be withdrawn from consideration and revised to plat this drainage area into an outlot or wait until the public improvement process can be completed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny a request to modify Condition #5 to the Hills of Stone Bridge preliminary plat approval. 3 .�/ CARRIAGE HILLS GOLF OO-Ujg5F 873.0 882.0 WEGCOTT ,D M GARDEN _- -I � I �L��3P�310 -1 JP-59�L 00010 '882 P 1:45 394.0 l!-42 197;3,.1'.: 88.1 N'JP 60r BBB., - 881.2 "JP887.0 892.3 I B93.512•JP-41 .; 885.3__ 887.0 7 .: ` ' 885372 JP -31 ! 888./�� ` 876.3 -44 - 880.4 e,; 30.7 NI it X517 Rot _ �_1 J -m _ J., lt''lir.::i °/ JP -58d 877.5 \`1 8822 'tJ JP -30 48f 873.0 879.4 8 8. NC tTH ti :"�v 27" iRK ��• JP -34' �� J -s ♦ 884.0 89/.9' , I I JP -29 al 926.0vl N�......_.! 945.0 w: i�- J-ee �=JP-28 "'956.0 969.4 J P -5l, ----854. OV ._-854.Of .1 P-•.3. ��`�• II832.! 854.1 16'4.0 ►79.7 L1N J' L.S.-I5�, _,.82 N� _j 9747 1L�-8 9p 2 i I: }� 4 (f�-- :8.0. I V'At NUT '.35 ' }TILL ,1NZ i LAI: 891.3 884.4. 893.6 r::kWno HR.5-A1,v'll 8660... N GP -9 L BT9'856.0 3 `"' 868.0 JP -16 JP-17� �► / 874.7 858.0 879.1 87/.0 \ /1010 ■ ` ~ Z�WL COTT ` tD ro, GP -7N sT Arlo' aa4.o l2 T JP -18 :872.00. �� 1 `'r • 860.0 t- 44rtg . RSC;. WESCOTT ROAD ,i ! .j P Q856.0• 864.4 nil -7 I J -w I ,.� JP -23 0 ♦ �/, 852.2 657.4 ro / JP -24 843.3 O Q 849.0 p0O JP -25 �l 817.0 00 - 824.0 1 - 14 }L.S. lI JP -26 96.0 806.0 04.0' )1824.0• s4, 1 0. � J-00 I f_ 30 _� J -y J:Z N . I \ I JP -52 jp-68 862.0 878.0 i t T-'•, I 1 rLP-48 .._.r ........ 14 UNITED MORTGAGE CORPORATION 8300 NORMAN CENTER DRIVE—SUITE 1000 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55437-1091 (612) 835-3096 September 3, 1987 Mr. Tom Colbert, P.E. Engineering Department City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE Dear Mr. Colbert, We request the city council of Eagan to amend item 6 of Exhibit "B" of the Developer's Agreement to read: An outlet for pond GP -7 shall be petitioned by the developer with the plans and construction to be accomplished in an expeditious manner. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. Sincerely, Ronald C. Helmer Assistant Vice President September 11, 1987 City of Eagan Attn: Tom Colbert Director of Public Works 3830 Pilot Knob Road, PO Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 RE: Hills of Stonebridge Dear Mr. Colbert: Thank you for meeting with Dave Sellergren and me on September 8, 1987. As discussed, United Mortgage Corporation wishes to finally plat the approximately 30 lots in the northeast corner of the Hills of Stonebridge, as directed by the City Council on March 17, 1987. We have submitted a petition for storm sewer improvements, including an outlet for Pond GP -7. Pond GP -7 is part of the Eagan storm sewer system and receives runoff from a larger watershed which includes the 30 lots in the northeast corner of the Hills of Stonebridge. It is our understanding that the feasibility report and public hearing leading to an ordering of the outlet for Pond GP -7 will be held in November, 1987. United Mortgage Corporation hereby commits to hold the City of Eagan harmless from any damages suffered by it attributable to runoff from the said 30 lots if developed with homes and accessory structures. As you stated, the hold harmless would expire if and when the City Council orders the installation of an outlet for Pond GP -7. This hold harmless is provided to the City on the condition that the City Council approve the final plat of Hills of Stonebridge. Sincerely, UNITED MORTGAGE CORPORATION By: Rona_ C. Helmer, Assistant Vice President d Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 B. FIRE DEPARTMENT: Item 1. Consider Action to Amend the Number of Firefighters --T was discussion in advance of the recent referendum which a here Fire Stations No. 4 and 5 to increase the number of volunteer firefighters. It was approved firefighters be increased to 105dwhich last spring that the numberofor 15 per station. provides a net increase of 30 additional analysis and isesu Chief Southorn has performed some to 20 per station or a new total t of 115 ing tvolu t ethe re firefighters. increased Please review the attached memo found on Southorn for additional information on the r prepared by firefighters. Y Chief quest for additional As a matter of history, the City Council at a G„e..; March 24, 1983 established the number of volunteer yfirefiehters °n an average of 75. The action reads as follows, The n volunteer firefighters was established at an average 75 at nd the Fire Chief was directed to umber of relating to the number offirefightersmonthat hly nwouldtincalareport factors that cause change to the average of 75 firefighters include further, that specifically, the number r volunteer fir Jude all the day shift be increased for Stations No. 2 and 3 to be g s and with Station No. 1.O firefighters for consistent ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM; increase in the number of volunteer firefighters beyond the cur number of 75 for the TO approve or deny an purpose of providing volunteers to staff Fire Stations No. 4 and 5, DATE: September 11, 1987 TO: Tom Hedges FROM: Ken Southorn SUBJECT: Manning Level - Fire Department The addition of Fire Stations 4 and 5 has ncessitated an incfor rease in volunteer firefighters. To provide adequate I am proposing that the numbProff115 from an average of firefighters be increased City, 75 to an average The proposed distribution of theepersonnel would be as follows: Station 1 - 30 firefighters Station 2 - 25 firefighters Station 3 - 20 firefighters Station 4- 20 firefighters Station 5 _ 20 firefighters We have 28 new recruits approved as of last week. They will begin training on September 28th and 29t h. sttions, Distribution of current personnel into newnewarecruitssasfof that s ago, was as follows; these counts in cludpoint in time. Tot l Day_ Avai able Nig t Avail ble _ 27— StatiQn New Swin 10 13 25 1 5 1 11 17 12 2 2 2 3 8 13 4 7 1 4 10 14 5 7 on Current recruitment practices are ails duringly cdaytime dhours band ntoga firefighters available to answer cathe new lesser degree upon obtaining night a person increas to stations. sufficient time for basic training an stations. Manning levels are being now d seasoning before the new stations are p cluding pump/driver training equals into service. Training time, ex given after 20 weeks. Driver training usu8 to 121wa one year eek duration• probation period and has an Action Required - Resolution increasing the number of volunteer firefighters to an average of 115- e Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 CONTRACT RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM 1. Contract for Radio Communications System to Receive Bids/Award Contract --Bids were received on Wednesday, September 9, 1987 for the police dispatch console and related equipment. Dr. John DuBois, the City's consulting communications engineer, was present for the bid opeing and has analyzed the bids and enclosed on pages r/ through is a letter and copy of the bid tabulation. You will note that the contract was divided into three parts. As Dr. DuBois' letter states, the City was fortunate to receive a total bid package that is lower than the estimate and meets all specifications and requirements established by the City. The City Administrator asked Dr. DuBois to put his comments in writing, however, he will be present at 6:30 if the City Council would like to discuss this item or have questions regarding the bids. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the low bid for radio communications equipment as follows: Contract 1903A (Dispatch Console) to Kustom Electronics, Inc., in the amount of $87,994.59; Contract 1903B (Logging Tape Recorder) to Magnasync/ Moviola Co., in the amount of $13,343.50; and Contract 1903C (Fixed Radio Equipment) to General Communications Company in the amount of $84,316.00. I t JOHN R. DuBOIS Communications Consulting Engineer Registered Professional Electrical Engineer September 9, 1987 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Nr. Hedges: 7005 Heatherton Trail Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Telephone (612) 927-6810 It gives me great pleasure to write this report, to the Eagan City Council, that summarizes the competitive bidding results on all of the fixed radio equipment :or the City Fire, Police and Public Works Departments. The bids for this "fixed" radio equipment consist of three categories: • Dispatch Console and accessories: Contract 11903A • Logging Audio Tape Recorder: Contract #1903B M All other base radio equipment: Contract f1903C Bids were opened at 1:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers today with the following results; all bids had the proper bid bonds and all bids were complete and fully compliant: Contract 11903A DIsDatch Console Bid No. Bidder Instal 1,er 1 Console Systems, Inc. Two -Way Radio Co. Los Angeles, CA Burnsville, MN 2 Kustom Electronics, Inc. General Comm. Co Lenexa, Kansas St. Louis Park, MN Contract #1403B LoRxinu Taoe Recorder 1 Wahl and Wahl Bloomington, MN 2 Dictaphone Rye, NY 3 Magnasync/Moviola Co North Hollywood, CA /v Amount $89,741.00 $87,994.59 $26,571.50 $16,014.00 $13,343.50 John R. DuBois Page 2 Contract ,4190 C Fixed Radio E u' ment 1 Mobile Radio Co No Bid Golden Valley, MN 2 General Communications Co $84,316.00 St. Louis Park, MN For all three contracts, in each case, I recommend contract award to the low, compliant bidders; the contract recommendations are to: Contract No, Recommend Award r.nount 1903A Kustom Electronics, Inc. $87,994.59 1903B I_agnasync/Moviola Co. $13,343.50 19030 General Communications Co. $84,g16.00 Total Contracts 1903: $185,654.09 On August 16, 1985, I submitted a Radio Communications System Report and ACTION PLAN to the Eagan City Council to modernize the radio communications systems for the Fire Department, Police Department and Public Works Department (including Streets, Parks, Inspections, Engineering and Utilities). In mid -1986, I was given approval by the City Council to implement the ACTION PLAN that I presented on August 16, 1985. Some of the walkie-talkies and two-way mobile radios have been purchased; the remainder will be purchased in the next two months. These have and will be all below the budgeted amount, approved by the City Council in mid -1986. The radio system for the new Public Works .Building was bid and the Contract awarded in April of 1987. That system was budgeted at $6,600 and the low bid, contract award was made to Contact Mobile Communications of Eden Prairie, MN for $5,028.60; that system is now in and operational ($1,571.40 under budget). Thus, the major portion of the upgraded radib communications systems to serve the Police, Fire and Public Works Departments is covered by Contracts 1903A, 1903B and 1903C for the total of $185,654.09. The amount budgeted in my August 16, 1985 report for the items covered by Contract 1903A, 1903B and 1903C include (from Table Eight, the ACTION PLAN, on pages 29, 30 and 31): U Page 3 John R. DuBois Task Budgeted Number Department Amount 1 Police -Fire Depts $ 6,600 2 P/F 71,500 3 P/F 27,500 4 P/F 8,800 5 P/F 7,700 6 P/F 11,000 12 P 6,050 13 P 6,600 16 F 6,600 17 F 5,500 24 F 5,500 �5 F 5,500 26 Public Works 9,900 28 PW TOTAL $1$1,6^0 The difference between the budgeted amount (184,800) and the actual bid amount ($185,654) is $854.09 which is more than offset by the $1,571.40 that the new Public Works Building radio communications system was under budget. One further bit of good news associated with this procurement is that several items were purchased that were not anticipated in my August 16, 1985 report, but they are covered by the $185,654 of Contracts 1903A, 1903B and 1903C. The unanticipated items are: s Base radio station and transmitting antenna/tower for Fire Station #4. r Base radio station and transmitting antenna/tower for the Fire Administration Building. a Replacement closed circuit television system for the Dispatch Center. 'e Base radio station for Fire Station #5. • One extra monitor receiver for the Dispatch Center. I am extremely pleased with the results of these competitive procurements. The level of discount below "list prices" is in excess of 40% and the equipment is extremely good quality. I will be at the City Council meeting on September 15, 1987 at 6:30 p.m. to discuss this bid and to answer any questions that the City Council may have on this report or on the bids. I will be pleased to work with the City Attorney in the preparation of Contracts with the successful bidders after the City Council decides on the successful bidders. / Z,— John R. DuBois Page 4 I am pleased to be of continuing service to you in this important project. Call me at 348-4081 if you have any questions about this report prior to the City Council meetings. Yours-VLsi cerely, • / s John R. DuBois, Ph.D. Registered Professional Communications Engineer Minnesota Registration #7350 JRD: nli cc: Police Chief Jay Berthe Director of Public Works Thomas Colbert, P.E. Fire Chief Ken Southorn 13 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 CONSBNT'AGENDA, There are fifteen (15) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. Personnel Items --There is one (1) item to be considered under Personnel Items at this time. Item 1. Seasonal Forestry Aide --After screening applications and holding interviews, it is the recommendation of Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde that Michael D. Higgins be hired as the Seasonal Forestry Aide for the fall season. This is a temporary position which is fully funded in the Park Department 1987 budget and will last no longer than 67 working days. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Michael D. Higgins as a Seasonal Forestry Aide. Item 2. Administrative Intern --The City has received a letter of resignation from Bruce Robertson, the intern in Administration. The effective date of the resignation will be September 25, 1987. Mr. Robertson is joining the staff of the City of Lakeville as Assistant to the City Administrator. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Administrative Intern Bruce Robertson and to authorize staff to proceed with the hiring process for a new Administrative Intern. Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 PROCLAMATION%NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S WEER B. Proclamation for National Business Women's Week --Mayor Blomquist has received a letter from the Northern Dakota County Business and Professional Women's Club requesting that the week of October 19 - 24, 1987 be proclaimed as National Business Women's Week. Enclosed on page _,� is a copy of the proclamation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To proclaim the week of October 19 - 24, 1987 as National Business Women's Week. 9 PROCLAMATION Whereas working women constitute mlIIIons of the natlonIs working force, and are constantly striving to serve their communities, their states and their nation in civic and cultural programs, and Whereas major goals of business and professional women are to help create better conditions for business women through the study of social, educational, economic and political problems; to help them be of greater service to their community, to further friendship with women throughout the world, and Whereas all of us are proud of their leadership in these many fields of endeavor, NOW, THEREFORE, I e. D± -t a. q, LL c S MAYOR OF n , MINNESOTA, by the authority vested In me, do hereby proclaim d c'f o v C-2- -4-as NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S WEEK sponsored by The National Federation of Business and Professional Women's Clubs, Inc., and locally by Northern Dakota County Business and Professional Women, and urge all citizens in this community, all civic and fraternal groups, all educational associations, all news media and other community organizations to join in this salute to working women by encouraging and promoting the celebration of the achievements of all business and professional women as they contribute daily to our economic, civic and cultural purposes. Date By Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 ONE DAY CONSUMPTION/GAMBLING LICENSE FOR ST. JOHN NEUMANN CHURCH C. One Day Consumption and Display/Gambling License for St. John Neumann Church --The St. John Neumann parish is planning a parish celebration on the evening of September 26 and afternoon of September 27. The St. John Neumann parish is requesting a one day consumption and display license and gambling license. For.a copy of th consumption and display license, refer to pages __ through . For a copy of the gambling license, which has been submitted E�_the State Gambling Control Board, refer to page __7__. The application describes the events that are proposed for the parish celebration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a consumption and display license for September 26 and 27 and a non for profit gambling license for the same period of time to the St. John Neumann's parish for a special parish celebration. CITY OF EAGAN son= KW* r"M M Cott n+w DAM, MINNESOTA SS121 Fee: �.57oo CITY OF EAGAN APPLICATION FOR CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY - ONE DAY LICENSE Reason For Event: I CLrisl� C��e_(�ra.�.0 Name of Non -Profit Organization: s Date Submitted: OEM Date of Event: 2 u Gve,� jO /f AJ N �*,v.J Xe «o A. The following' is to be completed by the duly authorized officer of the organization: 1. TRUE NAME: MA/LS#^_L �!}w�C'S �aA) Last First Full M le w 2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: /807 e -,_,AJ - Oa -67,+J r D -Z_ Street Street City State Zip 3. DATE OF BIRTH: ?d Z /Lel 7 4. PLACE OF BIRTH: 19f . 9MIL /,foi Month/Day/Year City State may- z qd8 / 5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No CJ If yes, explain: B. The following is•to be completed by the designated Chairperson/Manager of the event: 1. TRUE NAME : R RSftr�w �fh. c�� LCA mus/ 1� Last �D First (7 Full/Middle 2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: I 307 l_ ff�2�E4iR� 4W , /K ,J fJ%Z Z 3. DATE OF BIRTH: %3 /7- 5( 7 4. PLACE OF BIRTH: &. r- /i4.) . Month/Day Year City/State 5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No If Yes, explain: 6. How long have you been a member of the organization? ORGANIZATION INFORMATION: 1. Address where regular meetings are held: 1/30 6 01407- 1(dO d Ah Street City 2. Day and time of meetings: & 3. Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota? Yes X No 4. How long has the organization been in existence? 0 .'16AA S 5. How many members in the organization? SO o o ( / 6 z 13 F_1 -XC OAOR ears:~ Tei. m q," "Its xoe .o.1 Consumption & Display Application Page Two ORGANIZATION INFORMATION (continued) 6. What is the purpose of the organization? Cv0/�Sffip /c=2cac�Stt�P 7. Officers of the Organization: NAME ADDRESS ./(streets/city/zip) /� TITLE R e - 6e�'Z hLb ;i Ie' lL 4°20 Y/sur ��o R. iib `�� 7- - i�Sm `%3 /Lfxiul�-�e-t- /367 6) -.5�?z z - -7XZx .-rE-25- I ,5: O6 UA - o UtXQC-i6 �r b6C7c', D'O' 8. Give the names of any other persons paid for services to the organization: NAME ADDRESS (street/city/zip) TITLE /S 9.' 3-� /'�i o /j ✓�B - t1 cS �z z- �c �' %��e �r 9: In whose custody are organization records kept? /% /� NAME:Ak�� _ S ADDRESS: `. /"t Lz)i .4,411 4 Street City State Zip. Business Telephone Number: 91d -V-21)'71 Home Telephone Number: -/J S. 7 THE LICENSEE HEREBY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE CITY OF EAGAN HARMLESS FROM ANY AMID ALL CLAIMS OR SLITS INCLUDING ATTORNEY FEES AND OTHER DEFENSE COSTS, WHICH THE CITY OF EAGAN MAY INCUR BY REASON OF ANY ACTIVITIES ARISING FROM THE GRANT OF EN S ONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY - ONE DAY LICENSE. k-4-149 , and I of thorize O =icer o Org. o Event airperson Managereby st in duplicate this application for a consumption and display - one day +license in accordane with the Eagan City Code,. Chapter 5, Section 5.80, and Mi nr,�aCni-a G+-a+-iitcc FCJ^ TY LSE ONLY POLICE APPROVAL: Yes (V) No ( ) S IGfDATID ��• 2_ CITY COLMIL APPROVAL: Yes ( ) No ( ) SIGNED DATED M. s , Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board Room N475 Griggs -Midway Building ., 1821 University Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104-3383 ` (612) 642-0555 LAWFUL GAMBLING EXEMPTION FOR BOARD USE ONLY INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Submit request for exemption at least 30 days prior to the occasion. 2. When completing form, do not complete shaded areas. 3. Give the gold copy to the City or County. Send the remaining copies to the Board. The copies will be returned with an exemption number added to the form. When your activity is concluded; complete the PLEASE TYPE financial information, sign and date the form, and return to the Board within 30 days. Organization Name �' VC�I"I/:a! �(✓C.,.� f�(f# ��Jff',/� u.'-1 r.�%i%�%fr C✓rf1-'r'f`�.J'f License Number(if currently or previously licensed) Address j City, County, State, Zip Code Chief Executive Officer's Name Phone Number :ai [.. Manager's Name Phone Number ; L 1S:✓ J, 671--11044-6 10 7 `1<.�0r-A 14/:4 7 �? Type of Organization If Other Nonprofit Organization (Check One) ❑ Fraternal ❑ Veterans ❑ IRS Designation Religion " ❑Other Nonprofit Organization '0 In corporated with Secretary of State ❑ Affiliate of Parent Nonprofit Organization Name of Premises Where Activity Will Occur Date (a) of Activity Premises Address �J Games Yes No Gross Receipts Value of Prizes Expenses Profit Bingo x Raffles Paddlewheels Tipboards Pull -Tabs Use of Profit Distributor From Whom Gambling Equipment Acquired License No. I affirm all information submitted to the Board is true, accu- I affirm all financial information submitted to the Board is - rate, and complete. true, accurate, and complete. Chief Execur ve Officer Signature Date Chief Executive Officer Signature Date — - -. -- ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of this application. By acknowledging receipt, I admit having been served with notice that this application will be reviewed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board and will become effective 30 days from the date of receipt (noted below) by the City or County, unless a resolution of the local governing body is passed which specifi- cally disallows such activity and a copy of that resolution is received by the Charitable Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the below noted date. CITY OR COUNTY TOWNSHIP Name of Local Governing Body (City or County) Township Name (Must be notified when County is the approving body) r, � L ri. 6 a 5- nat a otperson Receiving Ap' hbati"' Signature of Person Receiving Applicatiom,tt Title Date Received Title Date VA IV CG -00020-01 (4/86) White — Board Canary — Board returns to Organization to keep Pink — Organization Gaid — City or County f: Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 OFF -SALE BEER AND CIGARETTE LICENSE/TOM THUMB AT BLACRHAWR ROAD D. Off -Sale Beer and Cigarette License for Tom Thumb at 4130 Blackhawk Road --Applications for an off -sale beer license and cigarette license have been applied for by Tom Thumb for their new store located in the Blackhawk Plaza. For a copy of their non intoxicating off -sale beer license application and cigarette license, refer to pages � _ through ../0 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve both the non intoxicating malt liquor license and cigarette license for the Tom Thumb food store located in the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center. 5 TOTAL FEE .7 'r CITY OF EAGAN RECEIPT N0. _ 3830 Pilot Knob Road --- EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 NEW L� RENEWAL PREPARE IN DUPLICATE LICENSE NO. APPLICATION FOR NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE PLEASE PRINT r FSI APPLICANT i c -rr / -r— . '� ;1 � c', (` LAST FIRST- MIDDLE ADDRESS c/ Z_`l STREET CITY STATE ZIP PHONE �1'y `� �, BIRTHDATE 11- L�• 3 FIRb1 c ADDRESS /I ST= CITY STATE ZIP PHONE L '3 7 _ `�61 W-1-5 671 � 1 15 LAST ADDRESS STREET' CITY PHONE MANAGER'S NAME _ LAST ADDRESS STtR=- �T CITY PHONE PLEASE CHECK -------------ON SALE OFF SALE � FIRST STATE__'_ BIRTHDATE_ FIRST MIDDLE 4,1t MIDDLE STATE ZIP IWA N 115P• HEREBY APPLIES FOR NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE /` ��'JYEAR FRal TO '� ? !� `' EVENT: Month Date Month Date ARE YOU THE ACTUAL PROPRIETOR? YES NO ( ) LOCATION: ?�r /It Ck' ,iYl�I��' ADDRESS ARE YOU THE OMR OF THE PROPERTY OF THE BUSINESS LOCATION? YES,(A-) NO ( ) HAS ANY OTHER LICENSE OF THIS KIND BEEN GRANTED TO YOU? YES NO ( ) WHERE i/d K9 r v q k ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES? YES NO ( ) City►year ARE YOU A REGISTERED VOTER? YES NO ( ) CITY�.r A� I j'/v 6 C _ RAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICT? YES ( ) NO (I"CITY (Other than a traffic offense) If joint ownership or if a silent partnership is involved, specify complete names, dates of birth, addresses and telephone number for everyone concerned. YES ( ) NO ( ) If YES, please list on the back or on separate sheet, all the information required. I HEREBY VERJ_FY THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP OR MANAGERS IN TIME PAST YEAR. THE LICENSEE, HEREBY AGREES TO INDEfiM1IFY AND HOLD EAGAN HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SUITS INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AND OTHER DEFENSE COSTS, WHICH THE CITY OF EAGAN MAY INCUR BY REASON OF ANY ACTIVITIES ARISING FROM THE GRANT OF THIS 3.2 BEER LICENSE. I (we) HEREBY AGREE TO OPERATE SUCH BUSINESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA AND THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF EAGAN. THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. AUTHORIZED S fIATURE�� L (%t;%r� ' '//� G,; •�,+- :-,. ,�' ' ! FIRSTMIDDL LAST POLICE APPROVAL: YES ( ) NO ( ) CITY CCUICIL P.PPROVA1..: YES ( ) c r -F,7 FOR CrrY USE ONLY SIGNED DATED NO ( ) SIGNED_ DATED 3830 Pilot Knob Road CITY OF EAGAN 454-8100 P.O. Box 21-199 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE Ea an MN 55122 g 'I Cil �� I, 4.L,l- d C 4E 7'T 1 hereby (name) - C1 JLIAJ�. F- T"Tt License for the make application for year from, the city of Eagan. i i 161' _L A,LL A C 1-t 1 1' '� /4 ," ` d I` C _ LEE 'VI tam S / ��,�+'�n-+ !3 S � Q� � �-�3 �,' r �' �'!'� U I�}•��''/��7�i'� 1� �,� �A � icy itSTATE: ZIP: If corporation or partnership: Name & address of partners or corporate officers: 411 A, LrQ;,--* %i �G7� /�l Municipalities presently licensed: Municipalities which have -denied licenses to applicant: tileJii CHECK CORRECT BLANK 1. PLUMBING & CESSPOOL INSTALLER & OUTSIDE SEWER & WATER CONNECTIONS 2. WATER SOFTNER LICENSE 3. WELL DRILLERS LICENSE 4. RUBBISH HAULERS LICENSE 5. __'�-CIGARE= LICENSE 6. KENNEL LICENSE MN Master Plumbers License # $2000.00 Bond & Certificate of Insurance. State Insurance No. State Bond No. State Water Cond. Contractors License. No. $2000.00 Bon & -Certificate of Insurance. MN State License # $2000.00 Bond & Certificate of Insurance. $40.00 First Truck, $20.00 each additional truck. $2000.00 Bond & Certificate of Insurance. ENCLOSE SCHEDULE OF RATES ALSO. $25.0 a year each -machine. NUMBER OF MACHINES_ $50.00 Initial & $25.00 Renewal. MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: CITY OF EAGAN. Licenses are issued for a Calendar year period (Jan. -Dec,) and t ere is NO PRORATED FEE on any license. Licenses will be issued to individuals or firms who are qualified for the particular license applied for. Failure to provide true and correct information shall constitute a violation of the ordinance in question and in addition to penalities, the license of any applicant may be revoked. OFFICE USE ONLY: LICENSE NO. DATE ISSUED: Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 COLLECTION/HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE E. Col lection/Household Hazardous Waste --Dakota County has requested a joint household hazardous waste collection between the County, Unisys Corporation, and the City of Eagan. The County will assume all liability and will be responsible for contracting for disposal of the wastes collected. The City will be responsible for publicity of the event and the cost of disposal for pesticides and other materials. The cost of those items is currently estimated to be $4,290. Staff intends to negotiate an agreement with the County such that the City's financial obligation not exceed $5,000, in the event that response to the event exceeds budget expectations. Enclosed on page 42 is a breakdown of expected costs and responsible parties by waste category. The event is tentatively scheduled for Friday and Saturday, November 6 and 7 at the Unisys Defense Systems Building. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the County proposal for a household hazardous waste collection with a City responsibility for publicity and costs not to exceed $5,000. Attachment 1 Expected Costs of Household Collection Assume 250 participants Unisys Costs Acid/Base Adhesives Aerosols Chlorinated Solvents Flammable Solvents Dakota County Costs Latex Paint Oil Paint Citv of Eaaan 74 gal. 271 gal. 11 gal. 63 gal. 207 gal. 568 12 drums at $425/drum $5,100 437 gal 9 drums at $425/5 gal. $3,825 "Other" 77 gal. Inorganic Poison Solid $270/55 gal. lab pack = $1,350 HWNOS - 938/55 gal. lab pack + $ 938 Pesticides 66 gal: $182/16 gal. lab pack = $2,002 (holds 5-6 gal. pest.) Nonhaz Material Oil Rejected Material Unknown Material 1,350 gal. 180 gal. 188 gal. 12--- Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, HILLS OF STONE BRIDGE ADDITION F• Final Plat Approval, Hills of Stone Bridge Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Hills of Stone Bridge Addition locatec I south of Wescott Road and east of Dood Road as shown on page /*. All conditions of preliminary plat approval granted by Cou cil action on March 17, 1987 have been complied with (subject to approval of the Public Work's Department Item #1). All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff, and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Hills of Stone Bridge Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /3 I . ...... .... . . . ..... ... . . ........... ..... ......... . Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, BRIDLE RIDGE ADDITION G. Final Plat Approval, Bridle Ridge Addition --Staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Bridle Ridge Addition located south of Wesco t Road and adjacent to Elrene Road, extended as shown on pages _ through __ All conditions of the preliminary plat app oval by Council on•June 18, 1987 have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff, and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Bridle Ridge Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /5 £f£ I`•'J` I Ll �__ �°t'Z. E 6�La.6s YM 5 S9 r 11 i it' e• i/Iwr 1/ r„;- Fir. �m..� u F- A ^T•� . "" ^r riE �i o. I • o•vB + .•' �. Q ^ •.i �({rjf..�~ Z`. �/ kIlm1l!~il Im�II! �- ?•�\\,4 w I/%I�\�* g a,S% G . , `II iI a I• iC +i EV*1 L - - =}--. * '' a F9 • •r�r'-.1 L—•,.uar J �. I 1 • �ti! ¢ -- n 1' �' II`` a '• — J^ pj � � �,r �� . Z u: I c `� •°s',i/• Q ,fie rs Lm„ -.J WZ; ':�...-� �, ,:ice. `\.els%� N f n`•r \�.j� I 1•.a�r-:. ay 4�4 .� • 1.'�' �'� ••y/ y. �1.-.r• : `.1CIIUD� a Ei Z4 FF To to w v/2�g `•r: —fin y►' ,t tri` /�\s �4 1 .- �r ,s• �s ; \t •ti i e, a ��•. ` s '►, F$� ''v�� ^'"' J Ui Fes- I n � ,; �.i� { �\ �: Yr}�4�♦.• � � •.M Sj [ ,:;y-' `.�.:f 1 . 1- .e. i �\� Q� ,m�• N 1 : j I? In i�,rt•�'''1l L, _L.r.�! � ` J (n .n s�1(, �•� 4 �_. ��`E ttt • -=1f L--�.J T , ;+''+.- + i:e - ww i � te W U t �� a�k�\a y� ;'rte .�b� _.:•: •:',b+� � I Y � :� 1 �_j{"`tb'^ � m I °' fr I? 'e111`a \� �4�� 4�.�,��'•Q �� y_I°�_. � �� '1I'!� \�� it w LL I'�.Ld•i,.,_. i IW... �� -� oy \°`. \/�4•i'►•. 7 r i. 1`- I �� p� • i� O I .•o�, �. 4 jf N �.~ ^ �a Ilia u.• 1 W I;,ry o , k•••.,, .2' C _ �j "'' o• �"r�.,�. ,�,'�� .^.•- , �s mss' J m • (A C ti y� rte.. � a 1. - ; C ' 4., '��y? '� @ Q YI m �. 1 a ��w � 1 r e1.9' I" � I ....... '�tiw �i a n �✓�� , � _ � J =^ Ci � . t , { ♦ V ~ Ir 1 W r t •`.,, �y,t`bis � ✓�;F" ` �,,,e B/.y% } � ! m r:� ��+• yS.�� '1 N •1 /�I1 �� %n>•ryzu ..-+• �3w:-J A.�,• / It .11 • ' �J.~%: +� moo• r `- obi, � 3N3813 .;.��•sxP % 5L23.5 � 9 !O 9 13314S -;UP/ 1 f `�—�—mob 3Ml H�1VWL---r a A l;Of1f •((`S �l.y Nq00 R P7 ly 4 Qa3 II 'r L�m ` 1 /]�' �l, r n '@ h�.I '/�\ * ill 'j�/I •'F in Co T ❑ WO JaiM.w •.a-, • S �' , ate+'- .�♦ 't �z •.w..+ • N ¢wx • o Qx 11.4 d r��= yj ; o ul•i ��l/%� W 0 i / �• � �_,. ww.1.. � — ___• L'aL L,� \mow d�" i • a Q[II e �•+' ^ PIIS �i+.r40 �:�e'n ♦ bt, 4170 Ln4 \ao a�'\'� ,y _ ��j. �1'tS'' s� qea •mgr' °'. �r6\\. p�e�� . • �f� ;\ ^��\� r NM❑ S •off — �S rr'�.t!- ^�6 �.w\ \!ami ) '�" .s �� _ap.�� ' q �� w / �� \\,e t1�o 1 ,i�. •�\fit '1,, ( �s\\� ��. � • CL N" _ ' = pvs .r at •r t� •i \'a' a'�\ . r . � �\; 'a \ ' Vie' Or i7 V UN� .t< <��'`"�;"• •.. rer1 .\\fin .e\, _y y♦, �by,�� 11A.0101L N W H . wN it ^ e J rr� U Z J J _ ISi33Ns 9-40 1,13-1 3351 1 3NIl .11f` e. ..:.�_. ,., •.�.—IIiir 3N32f"139� lym `s•,\\' ifl'lj^°�I -fl v...-� � '. � _ �� ya '� ''� � I"• u� I? ., �� :. ^= i l f ► af. n.1. - { y,. a ` 1 ,may' ='� O I - } � _a. 1 \ -j+�:+f'7 N =' 1 � ✓� f n � � (� • s�11�1�a `...�� 1, :� `� N-•=�� . �° _ '_ '� ,. � -•.,.� W r m F- `( • G. a ��pNcw •--•�� l; � � n � �`�'.��M..=lt �'tl',+ 3 �//rP °I� m?III•fII3Q)II�C= � ^ -,rr'� Y �ImIll �6.• �; sl. ►� 1 C Z NIN may- L ^ IZ7I ;— N --j -6� r L T Q W = 0 H Q r L11 .._.. _.. --- r ---------- ww. ^^_ _' nn ^^ ---- - _ - .... ..�.. .. ..-----_ _ ^....... ........ .... ------------- WG----------------- m--------- -----------^ V YYYYYYYYYUYYY. YYYYYY.....YYYYYUYYYYYY uuuu Yuuuuuwvuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu YYuu YuuuYYuuuuuuuuuuwuuuuYvu Is U. Z 1 Q la •� �a N 5G� Q e t!°�r� � i ¢ I • •9.0• dd ,N Y� 8 r wJr • !. lei N v C� Q li � ►.� a -P. 7 + f • i^fib ie R _ � * _ • f- R r� Ss Iti \ Y : EE W _ _ GLR[K • �T Vf Y ❑ KEP I cc W I � _ ! i�• +�� .� • Cdr � °t .%• I• .� RYNL 11 :�,. �r1n11�0 Yd / A�'a. ' �..i� Vim: � J t ` •off e �d • "�_ _� COW - � Q70YMN Y JZ,H�' N•e 7 W771.N �.GLILILN O i 98651 WUC `�ILTDG. I ` W006 GO.ON - GOLtoII I Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, BLACRHAWR ACRES 2ND ADDITION H. Final Plat Approval, Blackhawk Acres 2nd Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Black awk Acres 2nd Addition adjacent to Robin Lane as shown on page- 1', conditions of the preliminary plat approval granted by Co ncil action on October 7, 1986 have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff, and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Blackhawk Acres 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. I I 71 ■ Z: cn C.0 =D 6z;; -.E z W L) LLJ cr I I 71 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, KINDER CARE ADDITION I- Final Plat Approval, Kinder Care Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Kinder Care Addition located east of Krestwood Lane and south of Duckwood Drive as indicated on pageAll conditions of the preliminary plat approval granted by ouunncil action on July 21, 1987 have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff, and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Kinder Care Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 2-2— -2,5 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL PLAT, PRAISE LUTHERAN CHURCH ADDITION J. Final Plat, Praise Lutheran Church Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Praise Lutheran Church Addition located sou h of Diffley Road and west of Dodd Road as shown on page _. All conditions of the preliminary plat approval granted by Council action on June 16, 1987, have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Praise Lutheran Church Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. z u z 071 -vLLvv, M.BE.Iv .v ON H. i - .E __ (300(3 — - adoa - �� d Ja s Y n.7 �4 ar Ir` O ' - 4ip �E x •J} wi�`-c ty�p O I T f CQ Z h, Liw ;b.y u z 071 -vLLvv, M.BE.Iv .v ON H. i - .E __ (300(3 — - adoa - �� Ir` O ' - 4ip �E x •J} wi�`-c ty�p O I T f CQ Z h, Liw ;b.y u z 071 -vLLvv, M.BE.Iv .v ON f � 1 (300(3 — adoa _ �� Ir` O ro a O I f CQ Z h, .• a Q I m Ld I s6 1 I sa Y• ``' � I I` O � o F (l y_ �� O I � ooav N0I1dMX3 O � p. I fA Ki MSG ,II.00N F iO �s J O � u z 071 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL PLAT, BRITTANY 10TH ADDITION K. Final Plat, Brittany 10th Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Brittany 10th Addition located east of Beacon Hill and south of Covington Road extended as shown on page All conditions of the preliminary plat approval of May 3t of 1987 have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Brittany 10th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Z4 C Q r(� f T X W lit (. � �f I Hid It I /C / 4�y r'..r .. r, ..j • MiLr •� :I i•. •• I O Cow D 1 �� f - �a�•y,• y ; �' • • t N i, ` �: • ( is r ru R ' • �• �f ��{'I ow Z ~ ru 1-4 so ri 0 to 49 10 in •4 a .►f.rt.aa w •4. � � a •. �. •. i. 0- Is Us J It •� L �.�• X11 �� - • .7. t.__ - �� ..'. VI +, Jon 4i �� • t ry • �! 6 a aa•a•r = �, •� —89 •M'M.10 f • fl •• ire + �: v t I z, lit (. � �f I Hid It I /C / 4�y r'..r .. r, ..j • MiLr •� :I i•. •• I O Cow D 1 �� f - �a�•y,• y ; �' • • t N i, ` �: • ( is r ru R ' • �• �f ��{'I ow Z ~ ru 1-4 so ri 0 to 49 10 in •4 a .►f.rt.aa w •4. � � a •. �. •. i. 0- Is Us J It •� L �.�• X11 �� - • .7. t.__ - �� ..'. VI +, Jon 4i �� • t ry • �! 6 a aa•a•r = �, •� —89 •M'M.10 f • fl •• ire + �: v Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 UNISYS LEASE AGREEMENT, SPERRY RESERVOIR ANTENNA L• Unisys Lease Agreement, Sperry Reservoir Antenna --Staff has completed the preparation of an appropriate lease agreement for Unisys to install a private radio communications antenna on the Sperry reservoir. This agreement took into consideration the concerns expressed by Council during their initial review of their earlier requests. Agreement has been executed by Unisys Corporation and properly countersigned by the City Attorney and Public Works Director and is in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Unisys Lease Agreement for the Sperry Reservoir Antenna installation and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. PROJECT 517, RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING M. Project 517, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (St. Francis Woods 6th Addition) --In response to a petition submitted by the developer of the proposed St. Francis Woods 6th Addition, the Council authorized the preparation of the Feasibility Report for the installation of internal streets and utilities. This report has now been completed as being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing. The preliminary plat application for this subdivision will be considered by the Council under Item G as new business. If that preliminary plat is approved, it would be in order for the Council to consider scheduling the public hearing for October 6th. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Feasibility Report for Project 517 (St. Francis Woods 6th Addition) and schedule a public hearing to be held on October 6th, 1987. PROJECT 5201 RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT N. Project 520, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Yorktown 2nd Addition - Storm Sewer) --One of the concerns of the staff regarding the development of the Hills of Stone Bridge Addition was the need for downstream storm sewer facilities between Wescott Road and Becker Road east of Trunk Hwy. 149. Subsequently, the developer of that subdivision has submitted a petition requesting the preparation of the Feasibility Report for the installation of these required drainage facilities. This petition is in compliance with the condition of plat approval that was previously discussed under Public Works Department Item A-1. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 520 (Yorktown 2nd Addition - Storm Stewer) and authorize the preparation of the Feasibility Report. Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 PROJECT 518, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT p. Project 518, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Eagan High School Addition - Utilities) --The staff has received a petition from the school district requesting preparation of the feasibility report and detail plans and specifications for the installation of trunk storm sewer along with water and sanitary sewer to service the proposed new high school site. Although this petition is prior to the Council approval of the preliminary plat for this development, the petition guarantees all costs incurred if for some reason the project is delayed, withdrawn or not approved. However, this early petition allows the City to concurrently begin working on the feasibility report and detail plans and specifications to ensure the completion of the public hearing process which is required prior to consideration of final plat approval and building permit issuance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 518 (Eagan Hills School Addition - Utilities) and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report and plans. Z`7 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS A. Final Assessment Roll, Delinquent Utility Bills --On August 18, the Council received the final assessment roll and scheduled the public hearing to be held on September 15, 1987, for delinquent utility bills. Enclosed on pages 2- and 3 is a listing of the proposed final assessments. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to the affected property owners along with the amount of the proposed assessments. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections to these proposed assessments. The assessments are for one (1) year at 9%. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close and approve/modify the Final Assessment Roll utility bills and authorize the certification collection. e the public hearing for the delinquent to the County for v OPEN ACCOUNTS 12 PLAT,�PARCEL AMOUNT PLAT,IPARCEL AMOUNT 10 16701 440 01 $77.03 10 63981 040 09 $55.73 10 45075 100 04 14.52 10 84252 050 02 140.85 10 16711 160 01 47.40 10 81950 040 04 12.69 10 83600 020 01 39.74 10 17400 186 00 23.03 10 20960 320 04 25.52 10 17402 071 04 31.64 10 84351 050 01 72.02 10 16706 190 05 76.83 10 84602 030 01 83.47 10 76501 020 02 37.45 10 48050 041 04 38.41 10 33000 080 03 24.41 10 48050 032 04 77.61 10 53815 010 01 17.13 10 39802 020 04 127.56 10 39802 030 12 27.56 10 16703 370 04 151.14 10 17400 199 00 39.72 10 32001 050 01 71.09 10 17400 173 00 33.00 10 17400 051 01 102.59 10 63981 020 02 10.31 10 63981 020 02 85.10 10 17400 170 00 173.63 10 63982 020 06 72.66 10 13750 180 02 41.09 TOTAL 1830.93 12 2 ACCOUNTS SHUT-OFF PLAT PARCEL AMOUNT PLAT PARCEL AMOUNT 10 73004 030 05 $111.05 10 14993 110 01 $79.51 10 52100 050 02 98.32 10 17153 010 02 78.99 10 17402 062 04 40.15 10 17400 182 00 121.65 10 63983 010 04 160.81 10 17400 186 00 188.61 10 39802 030 10 109.97 10 17400 183 00 101.10 10 39802 040 08 86.83 10 17400 122 01 48.37 10 16602 021 02 72.43 10 53801 130 01 89.65 10 17402 150 02 123.11 10 84460 170 03 98.85 10 17402 050 02 127.88 10 84460 070 03 183.'53 10 17402 021 03 81..12 10 84460 050 03 98.44 10 72978 130 03 53.12 10 63984 020 05 184.66 10 18075"320 01 88.64 10 65800 070 01 111.91 10 14992 020 01 121.13 10 81950 072 05 100.45 10 76400 160 01 123.25 TOTAL 2883.53 2 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGe PROJECT 490 (WOODGATE LANE -STREETLIGHTS) B. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 490 (Woodgate Lane - Streetlights) --On August 18th, the Council received the final assessment roll and scheduled a public hearing to be held on September 15th for the installation of streetlights under Project 490 on Woodgate Lane. Enclosed on page __,&r -is a summary tabulation of the final assessment rate as compared to that estimated in the Feasibility Report presented at the public hearing held on June 16, 1987. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all effective property owners. As of this date, staff has not received any objections to these proposed assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 490 (Woodgate Lane - Streetlights) and authorize its certification to the county for collection. �1 FINAL ASSESSMENT 11EARING PROJECT NO: 490 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Woodgate Lane FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING. September 15, 1987 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report Street Light FINAL RATE $145.44/Lot NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 17 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 3 RATE OF INTEREST: 9% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $2,472.48 TOTAL AMOUNT CITY IFINANCED: -C""- CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: June 2 & lb, 1987 s F.R. RATES $152.00/Lot (F.R. $2,580.00) NA Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, PROJECT 477 (WINDTREE 7TH ADDITION - STREETS & UTILITIES) C. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 477 (Windtree 7th Addition - Streets and Utilities) --On August 18th, the Council received the final assessment roll for the above referenced project and scheduled th public hearing to be held on September 15th. Enclosed on page is a summary tabulation of the final assessment rates as co pared to those contained in the Feasibility Report presented at the public hearing held on August 5, 1986. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners. As of this date, the staff has not received any written objections to the proposed assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 477 (Windtree 7th Addition - Streets and Utilities) and authorize certification to the county for collection. 11 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 477 SUBDIVISION/AREA: WINDTREE 7TH ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: September 15, 1987 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. =.Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES Area Q Laterals $1,532.81/Lot $1,687/Lot XQ Service $ _991.55/Lot $1.003,'Lot Q Lat. Benefit/ Trunk ;ANITARY Area aLaterals OService E]Lat. Benefit/ Trunk STORM. STREETS ❑X Area $ 792.05/Lot $792/Lot C Gravel Base ❑X Lateral $ 193.60/Lot $147/Lot[K]Surfacing Both Sanitary Sewer & Water Services Res. Equiv. 1 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 39 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 RATE OF INTEREST: 9% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $297,301.29 TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: August 5, 1986 (F.R. $354,783.00) 86-20 FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $1 G.RS Aa /T_ $l, 538/Lot $2,627.19/Lot $3,930/Lot Aaenca Information demo September 15, 1987 EXCAVATION PERMIT/GOPHER SMELTING D. Excavation Permit No. 12-167, Gopher Smelting --On September 1, the Council considered an application for grading/excavation permit for Gopher Smelting Incorporated for the property located north of Yankee Doodle Road and west of the existing smelting operations plant. At that meeting, a real estate broker for the Borchert - Ingersoll property, expressed concerns regarding apparent lack of access to an existing land locked parcel. Subsequently, the Council continued consideration of this grading permit until September 15 to allow the applicant (Gopher Smelting) to resolve the concerns with the adjacent property owner. As a result of subsequent meetings, Gopher Smelting has submitted a revised grading plan which provides for a potential future street access to this existing land locked parcel. Enclosed on page is a copy of the proposed grading plan for this application. All other application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the excavation permit No. 12-167 for Gopher Smelting Incorporated. L-9 r 0 __7 -- ------ --` _a�----_ =- 1. �•,....•\�p`��'ty\x.1„•..1_ —"t- 1 I' ..! � �/ � � 'li .jl 1/ � -moi ��.��';. `�,: ��`; .,'`�\' ,, ,,.I, 1• 1 1, il` ill i ' 'ii' f � Yjr+ :r,, `, �, •`111 '. ,,. 1 -�• , 1 ' �.I L_i •r ...ice_-:� , _ �'�,�`\\.; •�' • �_ C•,. 1 / / --- )� fir'' ' J Try�_� - �i••9�j� � `,`` '• Ir ", .1:1�� /; ,r .• I ! ,\ }� �. �'•!. M, ;Illi `I 'i r• j '•I l \--iii"'� � ��r/ � i �� , � }!� I 1 ! '�1 ,,. \ �. it •' 1', II ia;1Q1 � �-�`` Y `` Ip ,ter. �%•= J" -_--- •�� r � ra. i `� � , 6 111 "�, , `� t `,1`�I •��_ -_-;_ -� __ IIIII� ��1` 1 • y.�, _ _- ___ � l � r �t'1�•� /1 , l . rl I F•• Y 111 1 I I • 1' I - _ ----- rte! � 11 .. .'•n!'i'-.1 1. - 1 I I 1' '• 1 1' I:i11 I � 1 �' �, __ _ _ -'- ` f_�t / `• i r '�i°I i is ,�' - - • � 1 ' ,.11I,I0I�; I1 S ' 111 `\\•\•',11 11� I11`I\:'ry}�1`_•hl 41, ol , 1 : •'ll ' f ', 1•` ,,11 ,`,•` \\\1,\ '1 iI 1,1'1 �'` � 'i , ^l 1� '• P ?t _ 1 1. � : 11 1 j \\. 1.1t.y1 ",,, - -- .✓ , "+. .{. '((r . ,111.,\ �. .' i V 11 .,,111 '1 i 1 ,ll\, i — , ;\ ri .f •� � r r o � � Ili '_ -- �.. ..` `\ ♦ 1 , •' f ; ''� �. ! r I III'!!•/ 1 :�4• 1\.` � __ _ _ ' f,% i � \ 1 • `II •, } - _ .,/�� _ I IV 1 � ,jr �'I i r '� _i `•11 `.�i, j -- - .III j 1 I r-F!r i•: ��%� • ''• a' �' i! •�„i� �J,/� _ ��_•�_____ � R 1\ I� III a \_., + \( .�... .._ ... •. /��y I�1r S� `a � � - _.. . 1 •ti. .. �` 111 .... ` \ _ ._s � � �� S � Ii�IIU� 1i''1�1, .'��--' -' �--- .-._I --- ----'I ...- L,• �-. "� .:. r: --• '��` "1 � _- _I:__ -!� I 1 1 I " I I� t Agenda Information Memo September 15, 10-87 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, PRQTECT 475 (DANIEL DRIVE - STREETS & UTILITIES) E. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 475 (Daniel Drive - Streets and Utilities) --On August 18th, the Council received the assessment roll for the above referenced project and scheduled public hearing to be held on September 15th. Enclosed on page is a summary tabulation of the final assessment figures in relationship to those estimated in the Feasibility Report presented at the public hearing held on June 17, 1986. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners. As of this date, the staff has not received any written objections regarding these proposed assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 475 (Daniel Drive - Streets and Utilities) and authorize the certification to the county for collection. E FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT 140: 475 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Daniel Drive FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: September 15, 1987 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES Area 124 Laterals $ 35.72/FF $43.55/FF Service Lat. Benefit/ Trunk STORM .. Area QLateral $36.37/FF $40.75/FF NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 42 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL'AHOUNT ASSESSED: $301,758.17 TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: -0- CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: June 17. 1986 SANITARY Area lX Laterals Service r-ILat. Benefit/ Trunk FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $_49.24/FF W .88/FF _ STREETS CGravel Base Q Surfacing $ 51.72/FF Res. Equiv. $ 24.08/FF (F.R. $369,040) 86-18 $80.85/FF $24.08/FF Agenda Information Nemo September 15, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, PROJECT 482 (NANCY CIRCLE - STREETS F. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 482 (Nancy Circle - Streets) -- On August 18, the Council received the final assessment roll and scheduled a public hearing to be held on Septe �er 15th for the above referenced project. Enclosed on page % is a summary tabulation of the final assessment rates as compared to those estimated in the Feasibility Report presented at the public hearing held on December 2, 1986. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. As of this date, the staff has not received any written objections to these proposed assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 482 (Nancy Circle - Streets) and authorize the certification to the county for collection. 0 0 Ok FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 482 SUBDIVISION/AREA: NANCY CIRCLE i FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: September 15, 1957 f IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. NATER RATES RATES Area QLaterals QService F-jLat. Benefit/! Trunk STORM . 11 Area ® Lateral SANITARY Area CLaterals Service Lat. Benefit/ Trunk FINAL F.R. RATES RATES STREETS CGravel Base . Surfacin5 & $4,400.19/Lot $5, 462/Lot Storm Sewer , ORes. Equiv. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 6 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 RATE OF INTEREST: 9% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $26,401.14 -0- TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 2, 1986 /3 (F.R. $32,770) 87-10 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT 467 (WESCOTT ROAD_- STREETS & UTILITIES) G. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 467 (Wescott Road - Streets and Utilities) --On August 18th, the Council received the final assessment roll for the above referenced project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on September 15th. Enclosed on page -_is a summary tabulation of the final assessment rates as compared to those contained in the Feasibility Report presented at the public hearing held on March 19, 1986. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners. As of this date, the staff has not received any written objections to these proposed assessments. The notices sent to three property owners based on the final assessment roll, which proposes a reduced assessment in accordance with Special Assessment Policy 86-3, were without the proper execution of the required agreements which allow the City to levy the additional postponed assessments at a later date if, and when, subsequent development might occur. Therefore, it is recommended that the final assessment hearing for Parcels No. 10-01400-030-53, 041-53 and 050-53 be continued until October 6 to allow staff to renotice the property owners of the entire assessment obligation of the respective property prior to any potential execution of the required agreements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 467 (Wescott Road - Streets and Utilities) and, with the exception of Parcels No. 10-01400-030-53, 041-53 and 050-53, authorize the certification to the county for collection. f C� 1h FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING ZOJECT NO: 467 1BDIVISION /AREA: Wescott Road [NAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: September 15, 1987 1PROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES t{ Area $1.190/Ac $1.190/Ac QLaterals 1" $621.80 $1,200 Q Service 6" $2.237.14 1 $1.687 Lat. Benefit/ $11.875/FF A-11.875 FF Trunk STORM . ElArea QLateral $0.05/SF ,$0.05/SF $9.80/FF $9.80/FF NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: SANITARY Area OLaterals Service ❑ X Lat. Benefit/ Trunk FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $28.69/CLF $28.69/CLF STREETS QGravel Base Surfacing Half Rate $16.88 $16.88 XO Res. Equiv.Fbll $33.75 $33.75 Rate 343 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 Years RATE OF INTEREST: 8.5% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $300,124.53 fF R_ t-297,670) TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: $ 281,368.35 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: March 19, 1986 86-13 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, PROJECT 460A SOUTH NICOLS ROAD - STREETS) H. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 460A (South Nicols Road - Streets) --On August 18th, the Council received the final assessment roll for the above referenced project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on September 15, 1987. Enclosed on page is a summary tabulation of the final assessment rates as compared to those contained in the Feasibility Report presen ed at the public hearing on March 19, 1986. Enclosed on pages and Z17 are two written objections that staff received regarding the roposed assessments. Also, staff has identified four single-family residential properties taking direct driveway access onto Nichols Road south of Cliff Road which were only assessed at one-half the residential equivalent rate in accordance with the original Feasibility Report. However, that original report incorrectly applied the street assessment policy based on its previous county road designation instead of its present local street designation. If the proper assessment rates are to be applied, it is recommended that the final assessment hearing for Parcels No. 10-03000-020-06, 030-04, 050-04, and 060-04 be continued until October 6th to allow new notices to be properly published in the mail regarding the additional assessment obligation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 460A (South Nicols Road - Streets) and with the exception of specific referenced parcels, authorize the certification to the county for collection and reschedule a new public hearing as may be appropriate. // FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 460A SUBDIVISION/AREA: Nicols Road FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: September 15, 1987 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES Area Laterals Service Lac. Benefit/ Trunk STORM . Area Lateral NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 30 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 10 RATE OF INTEREST: 8..5% SANITARY '[]Area Laterals 11 Service Cl Lac. Benefit/ Trunk FINAL F.R. RATES RATES STREETS CX Surfacing Comm/Ind. $78.45/FF $78.45/FF Multi—Family 78.45/FF 78.45/FF Full Residential 33.75/FF 33.75/FF Half Residential 16.88/FF 16.88/FF TOTAL AMOU14T ASSESSED: $537,910.04 (F.R. $575,14 TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: NA CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 4 and 18, 1986 /7 86-02 ,�erry' Carders & ilamezpr eentez Vitt. 4381 Nicots Road EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 E.J. Van Overbeke City Clerk -City of Eagan September 1, 1987 Dear Mr. Van Overbeke, Regarding the notice of Special Assessment, Project #460A, against the following property: 10-16820-010-02, 1 hereby submit a written objection of the assessment amount for your consideration. The property described does not have direct access on to Nichols Road, in fact, the property has already been assessed for access on to Cedar Ridge Court. To stress the matter, direct access on to Nichols Road was requested by the owners at the time of planning and denied. had the City of Eagan approved this request, the special assessment would be justifiable and the prcq-rty owners would be anticipating such an assessment. Based on the facts presented, the assessment is invalid, and refusal to requite is implied. Thank you for your consideration and cooperation surrounding this matter. Sincerely, Richard Schweim (612) 454-5311 m H. J. MASON DDS 2574 90 Street East Inver Grove Heights, 55075 Eagan City Council and Special Assessments City of Eagan - Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 * My property, identified as 10-16820-030-017, Lot 3, Block 1, Cedar Ridge 1st Addition, is located on the corner of Cedar * Ridge Circle and Nicols Road. It is proposed that I should be charged $10,329.51 for the improvement of Nicols Road.. My property is entirely located on Cedar Ridge Circle, Nicols Road is on my eastern side and the edge of my property is 20 feet west of the new curb on Nicols. When I built my building I made s?-ecial request that my access be from Cedar Avenue. The Councilres po-n ed that my property is located on Cedar Ridge Circle and not Cedar Avenue, therefore my only access was and is Cedar Ridge Circle. This required me to pay $10000-00 for the construction of Cedar Ridge Circle. Further, I had to request special assignment of my address to be ,Cedar Avenue instead of Cedar Ridge Circle so my patients could see I was still in the same area as I was before the Highway construction moved us. I am not interested in donating to Nicols Road improvement as my property and access is on Cedar Ridge Circle. Plainly this road improvement is for the benefit of Cedarvale Shopping Center and the Federal Land Bank properties on Cliff Road. This road improvement does not benefit my property or my Dental Practice, as I have established clientl.e who find me specifically. In closing, I hope that this letter covers all bases. I do not feel that my property on Cedar Ridge Circle should be assessed any more than any property located on Diffley or Cliff Road or any other intersecting road. If the assessemnt of my property is not dropped completely, I will have to seek help from several other properties that fall into my same catagory to secure legal help in settling this. Thank you, Harold J. M on DDS Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 PUBLIC HEARING, PROJECT 512 (CUTTER'S RIDGE — UTILITIES I. Public Hearing, Project 512 (Cutter's Ridge - Utilities) --To be continued. On August 18th, the Council received the Feasibility Report for the above referenced project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on September 15th. However, staff is recommending that this public hearing be continued until October 6th to insure that all required notification procedures have been complied with. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public hearing for Project 512 (Cutter's Ridge Addition - Utilities) to October 6, 1987. M4 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 VACATION/BLACKHAWK ACRES ADDITION J. Vacation, Utility Easements (Blackhawk Acres Addition)—with the proposed Blackhawk Acres 2nd Addition, it is necessary to vacate some of the drainage and utility easements previously dedicated with the original Blackhawk Acres Addition. All similar easements necessary for the development of the 2nd Addition are being properly dedicated with the final plat considered under the Consent Agenda. Enclosed on page 7-7, is a description and location of the proposed easements to be vacated. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies. As of this date, staff has not received any objections to this proposed vacation request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of drainage and utility easements as described within the Blackhawk Acres Addition and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. I/ Ob 0 J Lu W z 0 0 Q N L U Q 'i s I C�•.w�i�J �•i„, aoe1J �� T w,» e�'..+.•a .a;�.• », .•a •4r� \. (%1 Para � .. error f.N,1. • � I i I —ief.ee � I oo ' I ". �:, . ` .*• , f .. ; � �•9 ..' ;WSJ. �� ; - . .., � ., , �. T ~ I „ _ J ' v' ��, 8,;,s•� ,0�ty orf •'• t r `� . ,�L cq: . � � � -` �!' 'r,. 'f.t E•M1. 1� aL7 i �' i _ _� `.',� ,...rte/�•� �• , Ao El •� ''psi. ..a-:, �: p •. r� ,s b v,,. �• 'Y `-0+ 1• 1011n 0 t (• 'f -n — I Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT 442 UPS 1ST ADDITION K. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 442 (UPS 1st Addition - Streets and Utilities) --On August 18, the Council received the final assessment roll for the above referenced project and scheduled the public hearing to be held on September 15. Enclosed on page is a summary tabulation of the final assessment rates as compared to those contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on May 21, 1985. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners. As of this date, the staff has not received any written objections to the proposed assessments. However, the staff would like to present an alternate final assessment roll for consideration that properly allocates all additional costs associated with the delay of the UPS Addition in acquiring the necessary easements for the timely completion of the originally approved project. This revised assessment summary tabulation is enclosed on pages,764Z4 for the Council's information. Additional background information will be provided by the Public Works Director regarding the need for possible continuation of the final assessment hearing to October 6 to allow proper notification of any increased assessments associated with the adoption of the alternate assessment roll. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the original or proposed alternate assessment roll for Project 442 (UPS lst Addition - Streets and Utilities) with the exception of specific parcels to be continued to October 6 for further consideration while authorizing the certification of the remaining assessment roll to the County for collection. E mCM ONM r40 r•i 0000 t—a-%NN(DNt-0N m O m co � _:r O ko O O t0 111 00 a0 Lf\ %0 ON M 00 N Oh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d � � N OD S � N <` O o O O 1O OO N tl: Ltl tO � lD rl r-I N ti Lf1 N IT r 4 O .� Lf) O 00 m N M Ln m� t— O O O d; <` CT CO CDN CO 00 O CO O � c o m � =' N CA 00 O N Ln w w w H ON N 0� m ti ri r i ri ri N ri m t0 ? fEi r-i N M CNrI co to N N tD jol -66- ti 00 01 o �D cn N o m fir t� do co t` H 44 Ln m 00 LIl ? � Lf\ lfl w N N Op t. 00 m Ln 00 O to N NCV 0CV M 00 N 0000 =:rL-- OnNN ONt—OCV I'D m . . LfY . . . ao O . N . O O O . . . . tD Ln 00 aD In %DCn M ao ti. . . . . . . . . . O . ri ti 00 kD N k0 r-I O Ol O O =:r 1.0 co N ti O � Lf\ t0 � m � N -T USN OTM H .-• L'1000 MN MLf\M=r t— C) O O LO 00 OT ri 00 N Lf1 M N ri O OO O =• 00 m _:r 4- N Ol co 0 N %0 M Lf% N m m M l0 lD ti r i —i r-I ri N r-I M tD 6?i CN N --:r d0 rm-I m H .6} �4 !r 10d I m O� 01 a O a to -613- O Z a CM N O � r•1 N 0N0 r�-i N E A r-i .I� fr ti ri ti Ion N rI aWW cv N LLnn yt�i]� f+9.V 49• y d c O M -3 coa o N M r4 cm r-i C LL M v0 tD cn Ln _ a% 4-5 0 1 N � CO4cH N q43 co oo N 0 LNn m QI w w w Q w .N r-I m N m r-I O r-1 i M ,-t4] ER H � 419. r-I r-I ri m W S-1 v1 q' U C-4 q b O H 4m)q .4Pq s~ O Ww •r1 q +� U •rlO t7 v 0 'U .. m Ln V w4�1 .N •r1 �' 4.3 N 0 0 0 0 cd •U O.- N M t0 O N 0 0 b r-i O O 4� r-I N H S" O 0 0 0 0 0 bo C' M--r to l0 m r-' r- .-- .-- r rl Cq 1 1 r-I r-I •r1 1) ri Cd 1 1 I I cc �1 O O d-) d-) O d-) r-I r-I O O rml CA d.) dm� 43 .V 43 +1 43 43 4 H N .N O U: b O O 0 0 a4 rA � Ln Ln u7 r-I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O d HZl00 ula00 Baa 0to0 aaa H D0000 �r•xaaaa.aa. a0i W a O ca O O Ca r0-► ara z tD x ;�4 a4� a c5aM H A >+ W O • vE�z W EE-, H y 0 U W c3a N w d] O a E-4 m co 44 cd E Q ra O O H 4 C 6 q w m 0-• v c. O N a CEJ O 43 Cd a ..a q 4 44 dr A 43 h N 4.4 E map 0 0 M V rl it a ca O A W. * IK 0,:-�aLN0Ln MLnM00 MM L��N.7Nr 100 co 110 Ln L— Ul N 00 U1 -:r M 00 ON O1 N N N O Ul O U\ O Ln M Ln M 00 M M L'N--r Nr �O l0 m M ON 00 t0 Ul L Ln w 00 U1 0 co C C N N N 49- m %O N m0 Ln,a!I10co N[ NNNNNNN[-t--00om %O m Gn m rn Ui Ltl L l M, U\ Ln U1 ko M 11 11 C� 0 _:r MMmMmmm L—N MMO lo r-1 l0 w XT ON Ll- h- L-- L` L— L�- L,- L�- 00 00 ti r-1 •' CA r1 N - w r I N 00 M 00 M q r Ln r -I 0 O O 000000 OtnOCOOOO O N O [ O Ln O�U\mm01M r -I t0 r --I -:r •-- Ln r -i U\ r -I Ul -69. LONLOf\Ll-U1N f1H L'00 L!00 til0 M 00 r 00 r 00 U1 M ri O� ri O\ ri r O w w � M r1 M rI r{ 0 0 0 4 0 0 p w O Ln O L I O Ln O M OO N 00 ti 00 N N C Ln 00 M 00 M q r Ln \ V. N 1,0 r kO r- t0 00 w �O Cl 3 -r4 O 4.3 m r -I _-r O Ln C> O co 0 O O O p Z p N N 0 EO u7 7,� 000*000 000000 O O mm01�m0UIO%U1000 N LI- CV NNNNNNL-- tiCOOM O.-' Co _:r OO M 11C1LALnLnLnUIUlU AU1 (,0 CA m00 M00 M OWN m O» O O CD =:I, mmmmmmML—N m m 0 O�L�L�l�t—t--L—Ll-C-0000 t-- r -I m M m C\ , { 0 O O 000000 OtnOCOOOO O N O [ O Ln O�U\mm01M r -I t0 r --I -:r •-- Ln r -i U\ r -I Ul -69. LONLOf\Ll-U1N f1H L'00 L!00 til0 M 00 r 00 r 00 U1 M ri O� ri O\ ri r O w w � M r1 M rI r{ rlr C: 1/1 0 O vi r-1 r-{ r I r 1 r i rl r I r -I r- I r� r I r r♦ rl -N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rl w ON O H N Ln \O LI. 00 O1 O r4 �r-IrINNNNNNNNNNMM OD N Ul Ln L 0 N ti ra of ri M M 00 W O J N m s~ O sr w O 43 +� O M J .0 Llr b O N m w r M M M N Ln \ C Ln Ul Ln \ V. N 3 -r4 O 4.3 m r -I _-r O Ln -r1 ip 3 -N rI co 0 O o p Z p 0 EO u7 7,� rlr C: 1/1 0 O vi r-1 r-{ r I r 1 r i rl r I r -I r- I r� r I r r♦ rl -N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rl w ON O H N Ln \O LI. 00 O1 O r4 �r-IrINNNNNNNNNNMM OD N Ul Ln L 0 N ti ra of ri M M 00 W O J N m s~ O sr w O 43 +� O M J .0 Llr b O N N co O r -I s L`llo N%cLi Lin 110 rn rn N N N N tmn Ln w rl rl N N %.0 %D rn rn N N r -i r-1 Ln Ln w co � � 00 N N N410 > cl IliO�0 ° Oli co Cl-.,� a U'\ 0 — •ri .c.3 (0 •ri � O as .N o4.5 dN"e M O o •ri a o E .194 cd C4 WOO C, N N '•ri M -T co 00 co co 4A 1�9 L" 11 11 ti 3 r -I a � CM tOn L ° in L`�n ( N Ln Ln Ln Ln O d C� w C% w 3co OD � � ko d 4.3 a r� Lid •rel E" O O O O O N N N N N d ti N ti Lam- N ri � � rn rn rn cn rn d� ri r♦ ri ri m M E a 43 M m M M a Co XT Oo =T ao : Oo C� W t9. 4.3 'N .F) 43 .N to .°a .°a "°a ,.°a .a° 64 PZ M rn M o r -i rn Ln r i l0 q O O, O� O O CH O M+ •rl 430 -H .V 4.3o •ri 4. .No -ri .N .No -H .N o O s. 43 -ri " •ri ..a •ri . a •ri , ] O v �a �a tea. �a �a ani aA M Ln %D 76 N co O r -I s L`llo N%cLi Lin 110 rn rn N N N N tmn Ln w rl rl N N %.0 %D rn rn N N r -i r-1 Ln Ln w co C) M 00 .-' Ln M CA N Ln -0. O t -- C) -- O Ln M M 0 Ln C> 110 � rn ao 0 O Ln I'D M Ln -.r M M w w Ln 00 0 0 0 Ln N 00 AL o C) C) Cs1 ti �f1 cn O m cr, 4-3 o wk N 00 L O L4 W LO O w sal a ao ., Cl. 00 CD 01 .ice cn M G -a O w 7k O a •,tet Ole- 4.) Cl N CD w �a .('9. * 4-3 Ln M ON1 � • O o � Ln O •ri M N «! M O .r -j O Cd H O N CM o ani .r.f N .-3 H r- � � 00 N N > ° oa° r Cl-.,� a 0 — •ri .c.3 (0 •ri � O as .N o4.5 4-) o4.1 •ri a o •ri a o cd C4 WOO C, N N '•ri M � 0 v V)a •rl �- N 3 C) M 00 .-' Ln M CA N Ln -0. O t -- C) -- O Ln M M 0 Ln C> 110 � rn ao 0 O Ln I'D M Ln -.r M M w w Ln 00 0 0 0 Ln N 00 AL o C) C) Cs1 ti �f1 cn O m cr, 4-3 o wk N 00 L O L4 W LO O w sal a ao ., Cl. 00 CD 01 .ice cn M G -a O w 7k O a •,tet Ole- 4.) Cl N CD w �a .('9. * 4-3 Ln M ON1 � • O o � Ln O •ri M N «! M O .r -j O Cd H O N CM o ani .r.f N .-3 H r- Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 WEDGEWOOD ADDITION/LEXINGTON SOUTH ASSOCIATES AGREEMENT L. Final Assessment Hearing, Wedgewood Addition (Lexington South Associates Agreement --On July 21, the Council received the final assessment roll and scheduled a public hearing for August 18 for certain assessment obligations related to the development of Wedgewood Addition. The total assessment obligation which should have been respread to the Lexington South PUD was $63,251. The final assessment hearing has subsequently been continued twice to allow for proper notice. During this period the Director of Finance and City Attorney have continued to negotiate with Jim Curry and representatives of First Banks in an effort to reach a satisfactory settlement. Tri -Land Properties, the current owner, has participated only to the extent that they have clearly indicated that they will object to the assessment if it is levied. At this point, First Bank has agreed to pay $10,000 and Jim Curry one-half of the balance or approximately $26,600. It is the recommendation of the Director of Finance and City Attorney that the City agree to this negotiated settlement and cancel the assessment hearing. Attached on pages 19 and 430 is City Attorney Hauge's letter explaining the proposed agreement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the negotiated settlement or'to authorize the certification of these assessments to the County for collection. 2-7 HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. -ttorneys at drnaw nd TOWN CENTRE PROFESSIONAL BLDG., SUITE 200 1260 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD �►''� EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123 (612) 456-9000 September 11, 1987 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 AS RE: Project '/ Wilderness Run Road Assessments Dear Tom: PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN DEBRA E. SCHMIDT THOMAS P. LOWE Gene VanOverbeke, Jerry Wobschal and I have been negotiating for a period of many months to resolve the special assessments regarding 3-45 Project 493 covering Wilderness Run Road improvements which were completed approximately in 1983. You may remember that an agreement was entered into approximately in 1980 with Dunn & Curry and Sienna Corporation for the re -spread of assessments for Wilderness Run Road to land primarily along the north, along Lexington Avenue. The assessments were levied in' 1983 and inadvertently were taken off of the park land that it was originally intended to cover but not re - spread over the Dunn & Curry property to the north of Wilderness Run Road. The parties that we have dealt with are Jim Curry, who was the subsequent owner of that area to be assessed, and also, First National Bank of Minneapolis which has taken title to what was formerly known as the Kensington property on the west side of Lexington Avenue which they received title to be default from the developer of the Kensington property. One complication was that First National Bank was then in the process of transferring title under the loan guarantee to HUD, and it's my understanding that that transfer of title has now taken place or will take place shortly. First National is very concerned about upsetting the transfer in any way if the assessments were levied arbitrarily against that property. The City Council scheduled an assessment hearing covering the property intended to be assessed on September 1, 1987 which was continued to September 15, and the following is a progress report: Mf Mr. Thomas Hedges September 11, 1987 Page Two 1. First National Bank of Minneapolis has, through a letter from its attorney, Kevin Ellis, and through its real estate officer, Bill McRostie, agreed to pay to the City $10,000 cash. The Bank was attempting to condition the payment upon approval of a waiver of plat property owned by First Bank and being sold by Meritor Corporation within the Pondview area on the west side of Pilot Knob Road. We explained that the City could not accept such a condition but it was my understanding that an application has been submitted for a waiver of plat, and I assume that that application will move through the City process in due course. 2. We've also dealt with Jim Curry and his attorney, Bruce Odlaug, who sent a letter to the City, a copy of which is enclosed, indicating that of the total approximately $64,000 in the base assessments that were not re -spread, that Mr. Curry will assume 1/2 of the balance or approximately $54,000 to be re -spread against approximately 17 acres owned by Mr. Curry at the northwest intersection of Cliff Road and Highway 3. Although we have not done a title search to determine what liens and encumbrances are on the property, we've received indication from Mr. Curry's attorney that the property is free and clear and that there are no unpaid real estate taxes. 3. The recommendation of Gene VanOverbeke and myself is that the City Council consider accepting the balance of the assessments of about $27,000 in consideration of the approximately $37,000 that will be paid or assumed by First National Bank and Jim Curry. If the City Council approves this distribution, I would recommend the following motion at the September 15, 1987 meeting: Upon motion by seconded by it is resolved that the Eagan City Council is on record approving the proposed settlement for the assessments under Project -+43 146 Wilderness Run Road street improvement to be distributed as follows: 1. The sum of $10,000 will be paid by First National Bank of Minneapolis toward its share of the assessments under Project -44-3. 31AS VA Thomas Hedges tember 11, 1987 Three Sys 2. The Council will approve the transfer of approximately $27,000 of assessments for Project 44.3 to property owned by James Curry at the northwest intersection of Cliff Road and Highway 3 upon assurance that the existing liens and encumbrances against the property, plus the assessments in the amount of approximately $27,000, will not exceed the approximate total value of the property; further that Jim Curry will execute a waiver of assessment agreement with the City on a form approved by the City staff and attorney for the transfer of the assessments. 3. The City of Eagan will accept the balance of the special assessments for Project 443 in the approximate amount of $27,000 to be paid from a fund designated by the City Finance Director. Very truly yours, HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER P.A. Paul H. Hauge PHH:jjmL Enclosures cc: Gene VanOverbeke Agenda information Memo September 15, 1987 FINAL ASSESSMENT _HEARING, PROJECT 443 PARCELS 10-01000-010-77 & 10-01000-010-5 M. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 443, Parcels 10-01000-010-77 and 10-01000-010-56 (Robert O'Neil - Trunk Storm Sewer) --This original final assessment objection recently considered by the Council on September 1 was continued until September 15, to allow additional written documentation of any further objectionspy the affected property owner. Enclosed on pages �' through - is a copy of the findings and conclusions as prepared by staff and recommended for Council action based on previous appraisals, Special Assessment Committee recommendations and Council reviews. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 443 for parcels 10-01000-010-77 and 10-01000-010-56 and authorize their certifica- tion to the County for collection. 31 CITY OF EAGAN FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FINDINGS 1. Project #443 was properly noticed, heard and approve3 by the City Council. Project #443 was heard originally on August 19, 1986 and at that time a written objection was submitted by Robert and Grace O'Neill covering parcels 010-77 and 010-56. 2. The Contract for Project #443 was properly noticed, bid and awarded by the City Council. 3. The total costs of the Project, including construction, administration, legal, engineering, bond interest and miscellaneous costs are a part of the City record and amount to $ 4. The total assessments against the Robert and Grace O'Neill property covering the parcels described above, are as follows: Parcel 10-01000-010-77 - $115,064.64 , Parcel 10-01000-010-56 - $ 42,547.16 5. The City engaged Mark Parranto of J. E. Parranto Associates, Inc. to perform an appraisal, which appraisal was performed and dated January 29, 1987 determining the benefit to the parcels as a result of the installation of the improvements under the project described above. 6. The City Council referred the objections submitted by the property owners to the Special Assessment Committee on July 9, 1987 at which time Robert and Grace O'Neill, attorney Jerry Duffy, and John Klein appeared on behalf of the O'Neills. The Special Assessment Committee recommended approval of the assessments as -3Y proposed in the assessment roll and a public hearing was again held before the City Council at its regular meeting on September 1, 1987 after proper notice, both published and mailed notice, at which time the Public Works Director described the project in detail and reviewed the improvements under Project #443. In addition, Mark Parranto appeared as the appraiser for the City and reviewed the appraisal, indicating that the total benefit to the property was approximately $158,000.00, or as great or greater than the proposed assessments; all notices were published in the legal- newspaper and sent to the property owners informing them of the assessments. 7. At the September 1, 1987 regular meeting, there were no appearances on behalf of the property owners, and the Council then continued the hearing until the regular meeting of September 15, 1987 to allow the property owners adequate time to submit any written material, including proposed Findings and Conclusions, regarding the assessments. They closed the hearing at that time. 8. A copy of the proposed Findings, Conclusions and Levy of Assessments prepared by the City was sent to the attorney for the property owner, Jerry Duffy, on or about September 8, 1987. 9. The City Council, at its regular meeting on September 15, 1987 reviewed all information, including transcript regarding the proposed assessments and the Findings and Conclusions. CONCLUSIONS 1. That the parcels to be assessed have been specifically benefited at least the amount of the proposed assessments. 2. That the proposed assessments are uniform across the same class of property. 3 -3 LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS icil hereby levies the proposed assessments against all r.._ .__.. except those for which objections have been filed. MOTION Upon motion by , seconded , the hearing was closed and the assessment roll adopted .as to the above-described parcels at the regular meeting of September 15, 1987. CITY COUNCIL By: Mayor Attest: 3� City Clerk Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 PROPOSED 1988 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET N. Public Hearing to Consider the Proposed 1988 General Fund Operating Budget --The City Council has held two (2) budget workshop sessions to date, August 20 and September 8, to review the City Administrator's proposed 1988 General Fund Budget. The budget process began in late May when department heads were asked to compile their individual departmental budgets for calendar year 1988. The total department request for 1988 was $10,185,130. The City Administrator reviewed the departmental requests and adjusted the budget to $8,837,080 for review and consideration at the August 20 meeting. At that meeting the City Council reduced the proposed expenditures and requested an additional reduction by the City Administrator which totalled approximately $200,000. Revenues were adjusted to reflect a more conservative projection of permits, license and other related fees to be collected in 1988. At the September 8 Special City Council meeting there was a review of the proposed capital requiring equipment certificates and it was determined by the City Council that certain capital items should be removed from the proposed budget understanding that a one year instead of a two year equipment certificate would be approved for 1988. The main capital expenditure is a commitment to fund $200,000 of the radio communications equipment. There were some other general fund reductions totalling approximately $50,000. The budget as proposed to date for 1988 reflects a constant level of service for most departments. The mandate to compensate comparable worth, excessive growth in terms of street miles, population and other factors that require additional manpower and equipment to maintain a constant delivery of service are considered in the operating budget. As an example, the City Council is considering the hiring of five (5) new police officers during 1988, a community development director, additional maintainance personnel for both Streets and Parks as well as other clerical and staff support in other departments. The total operating budget under consideration by the City Council is $8,652,100. The City Council reserves the right to further examine the budget and shift expenditure appropriations or revenue estimates as they see fit prior to its final adoption later this fall. The mill rate that is under consideration by the City Council and will be formally adopted at the October 6 City Council meeting is 19.722 mills. This mill rate represents a reduction of .483 mills from the 1987 mill rate. A copy of the proposed 1988 budget handout that will be provided to the general public at the meeting on Tuesday will be distributed with the Administrative Agenda on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: There is no formal action, however, the City Administrator will present the 1988 budget as proposed and entertain any questions the general public might have regarding this document. -35 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 KNOB HILL/HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION A. Knob Hill of Eagan Homeowners Association --At the August 18, 1987, meeting residents representing the Knob Hill of Eagan Homeowers Association appeared before the City Council and expressed a number of complaints regarding the quality of construction, painting and a general lack of compliance with the original parking plan and landscaping. The homeowners association was told by the City Council that the City has limited enforcement regarding the issues raised by the homeowners and, further, that the willingness by the builder and homeowners associations to pursue arbitration appeared to be a reasonable course for settlement. The City Council also asked that this item be placed on the September 15 agenda for an update. On September 8, the Knob Hill Homeowners Association met with Bart Dunn of E. Barlow and Sons for purposes of defining a final punch list for the issues raised by the homeowners. Efforts are being made to comply with the painting and joint cover requests. In addition, Mr. Dunn indicates he has passed on information concerning arbitration to Karen Ganter of the homeowners association and that they expect to be pursuing arbitration on the remaining parking and landscaping issues. There is no formal action required on this item. VARIANCE JAMES DEL GRECO B. Variance for James DelGreco for a 12 -Foot, Sideyard Variance --At the September 1, 1987, City Council meeting, an application for a variance for James DelGreco was given consideration. It was determined at that meeting that the intrepretation of the variance was in error and, therefore, the item was continued until September 15, 1987, to correct the staff report and official notification regarding the correct variance being requested by Mr. DelGreco. For a copy of the staff report that revi ws the 12' sideyard variance request, refer to pages 7- through . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a 12' sideyard variance requested by Mr. James DelGreco to allow a garage to be situated 18' from the side property line along Sigfried Street at 4243 Sequoia Drive. FA CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: JAMES DEL GRECO LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 1, EVERGREEN PARR ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-1 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 15, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 9, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a 12' side yard variance that would allow a garage to be situated 18' from the side property line along Sigfrid Street at 4243 Sequoia Drive (Lot 6, Block 1, Evergreen Park Addition). PLANNER COMMENTS: The purpose for the 12' variance is to allow the homeowner to build an additional stall on the south end of the existing garage. This 14' addition will allow for increased off- street parking and storage. The new stall would be 18' from Sigfrid Street, thus the need for the 12' variance. IN 51GF�-►D c I I a� I I` 0 I m c �-- �c m n 1� 7� I I I I N 3 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 VARIANCE/DENNIS BOLDT A. Variance for Dennis Boldt for a 10, Rearyard Setback Variance -- An application has been received by the Planning Department from Dennis Boldt who resides at 2103 Garnet Lane requesting a 10' rearyard setback variance on his property. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages_,through-3_ for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the 10' rearyard setback variance for a detached garage for Dennis Boldt who resides at 2103 Garnet Lane. 5 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: DENNIS BOLDT LOCATION: LOT 11, BLOCK 3, CEDAR GROVE 1ST ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-1 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 15, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 8, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a 10' rear yard setback variance for a detached garage at 2103 Garnet Lane (Lot 11, Block 3, Cedar Grove lst Addition). PLANNER COMMENTS: The purpose for this variance is to allow a 101 - deep addition to.be built onto the rear of the existing detached garage. The addition would, at its closest, be 5'10" from the rear property line. The addition would be for additional indoor storage, including a boat. The addition, according to the applicant, will conform with the architectural design of the existing garage and house. --------- -- . ...... Bbl LIP.. ce") C4 Tv 'I'm 0 .p lla�- I I —91 210 02 IA I —91 210 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 WAIVER OF PLAT/KENNETH WASON B. Waiver of Plat for Kenneth Wason for a Duplex Lot Split --An application was submitted by Mr. Kenneth Wason for waiver of plat requesting the division of a duplex lot on Lot 11, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition. For additional information and the property description, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages S� through_ . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat as presented by Kennether Wason for division of a duplex lot described as Lot 11, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: KENNETH WASON LOCATION: L 11, B 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (R-2 DUPLEX) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 15, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 8, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a Waiver of Plat requesting the division of a duplex lot on Lot 11, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition. PLANNER COMMENTS: Lot 11, Block 1, is located along the north side of Cougar Drive near Schwanz Lake. This lot abuts duplex lots to the east and west. Sufficient utilities exist to meet the needs of the subsequent individual lots. If this Waiver of Plat is approved, all other applicable City ordinances shall apply. AC)!3E ENGINECRING COMPRNY1 INC. 1000 EAST 14611 STREET, PARCM A UNrv6R.SAL 13!//L.DE�4 COHSULTIHO E11011M. PLIIIII1EAS and LAHO �URVEYOIS PRO A10 l2S.UZ QW 76 BUANSVILLE, LHIMESOTA 51337 PH 432-3000 PG Z That part of Lot 11, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, l.v.ina easterly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said Lot 11 distant 37.56 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said .Lot 11, to a point on the south line of said Lot 11 distant 53.15 feet westerly of the southeast corner of. said Lot 11. PARCEL, B That part of Lot 11, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said Lot 11 distant 37.56 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said Lot 1.1, to a point on the south line of said J-ot 11 distant 53.15 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said Lot 11. NOR r/f SCA[E : 30 ' fifo,vr BU/L O as SETBACK L/NE, u `SAS yEE^; �/Ti[/ry I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a tract of land as shovn'and described hereon,. As prepared by me on this 12 'day of 25 t V 1 Q 9 .. 1k h i Jd.� soh r. N N n N I r y 0 Y I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a tract of land as shovn'and described hereon,. As prepared by me on this 12 'day of Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 SPECIAL PERMITfFAIRVIEA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY C. Special Permit for Fairview Development Company for a Temporary, SO X 201 Construction Sign --An application was submitted by the Fairview Development company for a special use permit for a temporary construction sign (8' high X 20' long) on Lot 2, Block 1, Pondview Addition. The purpose of the sign is to announce leasing space for the Fairview Medical Building. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages through for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special use permit for the Fairview Development Company to allow the temporary construction sign. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: FAIRVIEW DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LOCATION: L 2, B 1, PONDVIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 15, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 8, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: Application has been submitted for a special use permit for a temporary construction sign (8' high by 20' long) on Lot 2, Block 1, Pondview Addition. PLANNER COMMENTS: The purpose for the special use permit is to allow a temporary construction sign which will be 8' tall (rather than the 7' maximum). The sign will be 20' long advertising leasing space for the Fairview Medical Building. This will be facing I -35E at the highest point along the right-of-way near the proposed medical building site. 5 wQXJOIGAGa mun mould , _ t 1V'Id JLHVNIWll3ad %:fflA (IN � � ,il � � a -, - -., ftK, " Agenda Information September 15, 1987 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/HAVEN ENTERPRISES D. Conditional Use Permit for Haven Enterprises to Allow Automotive Service in a NB District --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 25, 1987 to consider an application submitted by Haven Enterprises requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow automotive service in a neighborhood business district at the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center. Action was taken by the APC to recommend approval to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Depa tment report, a copy is enclosed on pages _ through - For a copy of the APC action, refer to those minutes found on pages) through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the Conditional Use Permit application submitted by Haven Enterprises to allow automotive service in a NB District at the Blackhawk Plaza. SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: HAVEN ENTERPRISES LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 20 (LOT 7, BLACKHAWK PLAZA) EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 25, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 7, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Haven Enterprises requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow automotive service in a NB (Neighborhood Business) district at the Blackhawk Plaza located on the northeast corner of Blackhawk Road and Co. Rd. 30. Auto Max, primarily a muffler repair shop, would be the main tennant with a 2 bay car wash attached to the north side of the building. SITE PLAN: This .73 acre lot is located south of the internal circulation drive and north of Diffley Road abutting the cemetery on the west. All.building setbacks meet code requirements. The lot coverage is 21% in a 20% district and the applicant WILL revise the plans to meet the 20% ratio. The 16 proposed 10' wide parking stalls meet code requirements. The trash enclosure is on 'the Diffley Road side of the building but will not be visible from the street due to existing berm and landscaping. Only changes in plant material selection will be necessary to the proposed landscape plan that ties in well conceptually with the overall 11 acre perimeter plan. The building itself will be similar to the strip center - constructed of rock faced concrete block with wood trim along the top. All signage will be contained in a uniform sign band on the south and west sides of the building. 17,-- (LOT 7, BLACKHAWK PLAZA) CONDITIONS: 1) All signage shall be subject to the one time sign fee of $2.50 per square feet. 2) The three (3) parking stalls on the southwest portion of the building shall be designated for employee use only. 3) No roof top mechanical units shall be visible from Co. Rd. 30 or Blackhawk Road. /3 co -ww. I N W m C%jW �- z • W i Q rfI � _ r L " ujW � let l i:11 'i i1(�i til'.+i,�' s :y lii7 �1 J1a Jiii co -ww. I N W m C%jW �- z W i Q 2 � } � _ r ujW � -ww. I N U m �j � l a OL "TO MAX m r--§, q6 a OL "TO MAX m r--§, ~•n .. '�� .,'.'� � : t •: * �r'.1 .�. •. ... ... .. .i 1. JJt '� I ^= � •r'�Y'"!'E�H� �. .-�v� �%�+7�Y'^e 1 .r dt Vr rn ;4q u' l� • "M •__. TSD MAX • .. IMtlefd_ • • CiMG4C • - oar rr � �� )� �� § V�,_ �.5-m=z7iel -g. tr.., clr�n APC Minutes August 25, 1987 '•.; Member McCrea expressed extreme concern in regard to traffic and the impact on the school. Mr. Runkle explained that the detailed traffic analysis was being completed, and that school districts had only expressed concern regarding school bus stops on Rahn Road. In response to McCrea's questions, it was agreed that the proposal required additional curb cuts, as compared to the traffic pattern described in the Planned Development Contract. Chairman Hall explained to the public that the differentiation between Regional Shopping Center and Community Shopping Center was an inexact science and the commercial classifications follow rather than set trends in development. Member Trygg asked the City's traffic consultant, Bob Byers, why there was a difference between the background traffic described by the developer's traffic expert and the City's. Mr. Byers indicated that the 2% increase in background traffic proposed by the developer's consultant was consistent with the average city in Minnesota, but far below the type of growth being experienced in Eagan, which might be more like 10% per year. Trygg then asked whether access on Cliff Road was an impossibility. Mr. Foertsch advised that the Dakota County Plat Commission had recommended restricting access. However, the County can be approached if, in the City's opinion, it would be best that access be provided on Cliff Road. Mr. Trygg then asked the staff to address, before the next meeting, whether rezoning is necessary and whether the acreage had changed. Mr. Voracek indicated that a person has an obligation to review the zoning of the property in the area he is moving into. He also asked legal staff to consider whether an amendment to the PD is necessary; whether the entire development can be reviewed as a part of the current proposal, and whether the EAW is adequate. Harrison moved to continue the proposal for 30 days, subject to a review of all the legal questions discussed, including amendment to the PD, rezoning, an EAW and addressing the traffic problems. Voracek seconded the motion. All voted yea, except Trygg, McCrea and Gustafson who voted nay. HAVEN ENTERPRISES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - BLACKHAWK PLAZA The second public hearing of the evening was convened at 10:30 p.m. by Chairman Hall in regard to the application of Haven Enterprises, Inc. for a conditional use permit to allow an automotive service center in an NB (Neighborhood District) at the Blackhawk Plaza located on the northeast corner of Blackhawk Road and County Road #30 (Diffley Road) in the southeast quarter of Section 20. Mr. Runkle introduced the project and the applicant appeared indicating that the exterior would be similar to the /9 7 APC Minutes August 25, 1987 shopping center with building sign only. Mr. Mario Racelis, a homeowner on Blackhawk Road, appeared, indicating that they had no problem with the location, although he requested that no parts be stored outside and that the facility be closed by 9:00 or 10:00 p.m. The developer was not sure when the tenant would close his facility but indicated the shopping center closed at 12:00 p.m. Wilkins questioned whether a pylon sign would be allowed later on. Mr. Runkle indicated there probably was room for another pylon sign and that the building sign would require a permit and fee. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 2. The three (3) parking stalls on the southwest portion of the building shall be designated for employee use only. 3. No roof top mechanical units shall be visible from County Road #30 or Blackhawk Road. 4. Business hours shall not extend beyond 8:30 to 9:00 p.m. 5. Lot coverage shall not exceed 200. All voted yes. DODD FARM ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall called the next public hearing of the evening in regard to the request of Robert Engstrom Associates, Inc. for preliminary plat consisting of 7 lots ori 3.0 acres abutting the west side of Dodd Road, north of Golden Meadow Road, in the northwest quarter of Section 25. Mr. Runkle described the proposal briefly. Ms. Deb Schad, 4332 Stirrup Lane, requested consideration for the standing water problem in her lot and the adjacent property. Mr. Foertsch indicated that the drainage was being addressed in the proposed storm sewer plan. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. Lots 1 and 7 shall have their driveways connect to Haeg Court. O Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 PRELIMINARY PLAT/DODD FARM ADDITION E. Preliminary Plat for Robert Engstrom Associates for Dodd Farm Addition consisting of 7 Lots on 3 Acres --A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting held on August 25, 1987 to consider a preliminary plat application entitled Dodd Farm Addition consisting of seven (7) single-family lots along the west side of Dodd Road south of Hackmore Drive on Outlot A of the Haeg Addition. The APC is recommending approval of the application. For a copy of the Planning and Engineering Department's report, refer to pages Zy- through The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission met on Thursday, September 3, 1987 and are recommending a cash dedication to satisfy this proposed development. For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to those minutes, copies enclosed on pages through 3!5 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled Dodd Farm Addition consisting of seven (7) lots. ,7/ V SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (DODD FARM ADDITION) APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOCIATES, INC. LOCATION: NW 1/4 SECTION 25 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 SINGLE FAMILY DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 25, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 7, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a - Preliminary Plat for the Dodd Farm Addition consisting of 8 single family lots along the west side of Dodd Road south of Hackmore Drive on Outlot A of the Haeg Addition. This site was rezoned R-1 in July 1984 and was intended to be the Phase 2 part of that development. The original plan was to create 4 lots with frontage on Dodd Road. A condition of the Haeg Addition stated that Lots 1 and 2 shall have a shared driveway as would Lots 3 and 4. The new proposal is for a short cul-de-sac with no individual driveways onto Dodd Road. The lots vary in size from 12,000 SF to 19,798 SF and all are at least 85' wide at the setback line. The existing house on Lot 1 meets setback requirements. This plat has a gross density of 2.3 units/acre and is consistent with the January 1987 Land Use Plan that designates this areas as D-1 (0-3 Units/Acre). The site is primarily open grassland with scattered trees of little value except for some along -the west property line that should be preserved if possible. � Z GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The existing topography of the proposed site slopes from northeast to southwest. The proposed grading generally follows the existing topography in concept that the majority of the drainage is directed to the south and west. The directing of the drainage to flow overland onto the southerly and westerly adjacent Overview Estates will not be allowed. Staff is concerned with the potential problems which arise from allowing a development to direct its backyard drainage onto adjacent backyards along common side lot lines for conveyance into the sewer system. The conveying of the street drainage from proposed Haeg Court onto Dodd Road will not be allowed. The development will be required to intercept all street and backyard drainage and convey this runoff by storm sewer into the existing storm sewer in Stirrup Street. The existing storm sewer irr Stirrup Street is adequately sized to handle the runoff generated from this proposed development. A suggested storm sewer layout would be to slope Haeg Court to the west, change the high point in the cul-de-sac to a low point, construct the storm sewer along the lot line common to Lots 4 and 5 of the proposed Dodd Farm Addition to a low point in the backyards of Lots 4 and 5 of the Overview Estates and the back yard of Lot 5 of the Dodd Farm Addition, construct a catch basin in this common low area, continue the storm sewer along the common lot line of Lots 4 and 5 of Overview Estates into the existing 24" storm sewer in Stirrup Street. The development will be responsible for providing and maintaining erosion and sediment control measures in accordance with City of Eagan standards throughout the entire construction phase of the development. UTILITIES: Water main and sanitary sewer service of adequate capacity and depth are readily available to the proposed site. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed site is readily available from Dodd Road. ASSESSMENTS: The parcel proposed to be platted as the Dodd Farm development has been partially assessed for sanitary sewer trunk, water area and Dodd Road upgrade at -the single family rate. There are no pending assessments of record and the following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval: Project # Description Usage Rate Quantity Amount 241 Storm Sewer Trunk SF $.053/S.F. 112,075 S.F. $5,940.00 241 Sanitary Sewer Trunk SF 1,300/Acre 1 Acre 1,300.00 241 Water Area SF 1,250/Acre 1 Acre 1,250.00 241 Dodd Road Upgrade SF 8.70/F.F. 362.85 F.F. 3,158.00 TSL P140POSED ASSFSSMENr $11,648.00 The final assessment obligations are determined based on final plat dimensions and areas and the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. 23 CONDITIONS: DODD FARM ADDITION 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. Lots 1 and 8 shall have their driveways connect to Haeg Court. 3. All runoff by the proposed Dodd Farm Addition shall be intercepted by storm sewer and conveyed into the existing storm sewer system in Stirrup Street. 4. This development shall also comply with the most recent requirements of the standard conditions of approval as adopted _by Council action. 2� ✓% . K STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Wav _1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to.final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. (OVER) 25 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Imorovements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: Rev ised: STANDARD r,� LTS=2 _�- J' r �:2ai i j I ��06 ti7 I v CIii 7 11 :. JE S T (I 5 ,2 i _.3 <_ I 33 - i r\�O Z3 o � � t DOD` D ROAD — H . — — — — —.. —-- .. l i — — � ;. — _ — __ �'i'`-� ;fir• � �� ------- 1A DODD FARM _-- James R. Hili, inn. e .ar... V oo a i o a PRELIMINARYuDaPLAT / SITE PLAN ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOCIATES, INC. ""- PLANNERS / ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS 0 OU 1[OT < <[O...T .DD TIOw. D.aDT. [DUwT•, r [ WWICD[M S. WOOa CTCt W 5". N.RR -3029 sa mZ 3D � Ii u I m i L-�--- I v CIii 7 11 :. JE S T (I 5 ,2 i _.3 <_ I 33 - i r\�O Z3 o � � t DOD` D ROAD — H . — — — — —.. —-- .. l i — — � ;. — _ — __ �'i'`-� ;fir• � �� ------- 1A DODD FARM _-- James R. Hili, inn. e .ar... V oo a i o a PRELIMINARYuDaPLAT / SITE PLAN ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOCIATES, INC. ""- PLANNERS / ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS 0 OU 1[OT < <[O...T .DD TIOw. D.aDT. [DUwT•, r [ WWICD[M S. WOOa CTCt W 5". N.RR -3029 FH I v El„I :� EI;T:.Tc= 6 ( S 1 2 .3 I g J -- F' EPL " T ! i DODD ROAD rn rfl :fir! m • •Mt :� 1 -1 -95H. -I. -i-713:3 _3 C ZZ tv 2q DODD FARM � James R. Hil I, inc. oy o a; PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN -=`r*' �gROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNERS / ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS y .a I•tt •a0iti0.. 0••oTt COu.tt, .i..f tot• '^—+�— R200MM%JLO� SES •�OP�•1P1 W YSt7 • 6C-0lt-ba ' ou T.Ot ;1EW EIS1�44TE'S Q 4 II 3 = I 1 REPLA� i • R 4 ` ` —�-- r rr 111, .117 15; 11 . fl II ` 1 1 t; • ti `�j a tl I! rat iii: s� _i in i13 '=' 1 # , I • II '! 11 I'_, pat, i1 .1 J14 IM I b E•3 l z 212-4 1 4e�c7 :z a :'a 5E t: a --! 1 ::32 ..... S r V. -� o 3000 FARM' -- James R. Hill inc- PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN !,ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNERS/ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS ' oV iiori.-�♦ ••nT�■.n•a. o.aa...... y'. •..Ott ® —19O<Df A[. i. ALDCL-10.-5.5 7.02-60-400 \n N 1 • R 4 ` ` —�-- r rr 111, .117 15; 11 . fl II ` 1 1 t; • ti `�j a tl I! rat iii: s� _i in i13 '=' 1 # , I • II '! 11 I'_, pat, i1 .1 J14 IM I b E•3 l z 212-4 1 4e�c7 :z a :'a 5E t: a --! 1 ::32 ..... S r V. -� o 3000 FARM' -- James R. Hill inc- PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN !,ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNERS/ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS ' oV iiori.-�♦ ••nT�■.n•a. o.aa...... y'. •..Ott ® —19O<Df A[. i. ALDCL-10.-5.5 7.02-60-400 N 1 L • R 4 ` ` —�-- r rr 111, .117 15; 11 . fl II ` 1 1 t; • ti `�j a tl I! rat iii: s� _i in i13 '=' 1 # , I • II '! 11 I'_, pat, i1 .1 J14 IM I b E•3 l z 212-4 1 4e�c7 :z a :'a 5E t: a --! 1 ::32 ..... S r V. -� o 3000 FARM' -- James R. Hill inc- PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN !,ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNERS/ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS ' oV iiori.-�♦ ••nT�■.n•a. o.aa...... y'. •..Ott ® —19O<Df A[. i. ALDCL-10.-5.5 7.02-60-400 DODD FARM 1+16" � 119 54.6/71.0 V ' 1 12» 16" ~ �2 1 118 53.1/66.0 � 50.3/670 I i P 12 179 ' �r—� � � � �� r �� r � 117 53.7/ 72.0 <�;�-'• 23 `�� ♦ 24 / ,_ _1 178 51.4 / 65.0 18.4/29.0 ,' � 116 66 7/ 85 CK 20" 160 tf; 19.I � 3 f. O-' f�`C)o 181 1 1020 I 11 182 1 680/720 J 1237 12" 860/9.0 45.6/,- 20" 5.6/; is� `t84'eliQQ.O� !?c'• y 20" 94.7/100.0 i I 6 M, G. GROUND STORAGE 5000 G.P.M. BOOSTER \ \ H.W.L. 1059 I 68.0 24" i 72 0- 20" -- 20" _s 184 68.7/ 74.0 185 74.4/82.0 20» a 85.2/95 J 200 70.8/76.07 10 !2 20 6 '203 43.3/56.0 � r� q ;9SL'�TiO:i'f=ter{', 1,475/63.0 50.6/66.0`- L.. 1s L (EWOCO' %1 ` II : Q lil�i5 1 DAKOTA COUNTY PARK ��. ..iii' •�-,:i '�------ �pp} EKCEPTi;N (NOT INCLUDED tr, IBJ PAR, n• city of eagan Lt PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME 78.7/9 W z 40Fo , _. __.._. 42.2/58.0 1020 187 39.0/54Q .0 188 16"--... ;'•' . NO.42 a2 OAU - 8/ 95.0--_ ':prnr r 12° --� / S.�t. 16" r 112" % D20 2 3.0 884/990 ,� 1 190 1 195 174.6/820 � F % 196 6" OVERHlt-C --1 1 GA'K3 11 1833/95.0 194 ' '- - •12 -` �� 1 191 jl2" tiQ/a 112„ e 193' __..-.a0 DODD IIEN HC.�LE�Sr r ST-� MAROTZIE 12" f� 60,.9/740 192 SUBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN R23W FIG. +3 approved L standard plate # : --- DODD FARM I12 I C-JJ\�� ! 1 C -PP _i I C -HH 1 > i�... lZ ' / —. ^''•` `211 24 C - KK lr i 211- s,= -� C -II i� 54 , 11�1 211 1 .�� 12 nAue1TOR'S SUED NO4- 5g ;;ui , Of C -8V �YfC-C i C -LL J __30 46 26 30 Fc.i., C -EE �a,FkSx +may; 50 12' 51 " 1 DAKOTA + COUNTY �4 PARK FF C -A0000 ; �L (NOT IrJLL CED IN PARK) 1 Yi:-';�• 5 LLETS —� ADD, 'AAROTZKE \ I C -GG' z ............... ................ ............... SUBJECT PARCEL FIG.. #2 city of eagan SANITARY SEWER approved : plate #d EDPUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMEN -3 7,- m Jr 1 i 108 100 100100 137.75 50 y -Wwm --j �� HACKMORE DRIVE n 6 ,,,,, ; 623.618 3 N8904 r- 89046 03 E�rArce 1 - 0 434 3��9 ^4 6,0 WMtFVVWW z 2 S 89046bTw Pn r 14 I 90 90 90 126.63 f a - I cwr 8 1 w w!� v w It = I n i� r d o O O I �' rt O 2 V r► 3 O e 4 - -0 r rn N r 90 90 90 IIS.37Q 0CD 00 W 2 804 ' o "w. 3 5. - X c W n n in r4eri � m m _ �g ( h V1 3 t in _ to to ®tl R in .d 14921 - f 0000 X. :.tib ':•:•:..:::::: .......r:•:•Vi .•' . h • 'n '.�a •'ti� N 49.61 '.�•: •:ti �•:�•:• :�:'. :�:��. v :•h• {:� 4Q I 329.89 - 30.4f :D roo.as f � n r 2- OUTLOT ADO 7r3s A STORM SEWER TRUNK 112,075 sq.ft. SANITARY SEWER TRUNK 1 Ac. and WATER TRUNK 1 ACRE A m m ®m i DODD ROAD UPGRADE 362.85 ft. City Of @agar approved: standard PUBLIC DODD FARM plate # - WORKS DEPARTMENT�� APC Minutes August 25, 1987 shopping center with building sign only. Mr. Mario Racelis, a homeowner on Blackhawk Road, appeared, indicating that they had no problem with the location, although he requested that no parts be stored outside and that the facility be closed by 9:00 or 10:00 p.m. The developer was not sure when the tenant would close his facility but indicated the shopping center closed at 12:00 p.m. Wilkins questioned whether a pylon sign would be allowed later on. Mr. Runkle indicated..there probably was room for another pylon sign and that the building sign would require a permit and fee. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 2. The three (3) parking stalls on the southwest portion of the building shall be designated for employee use only. 3. No roof top mechanical units shall be visible from County Road #30 or Blackhawk Road. 4. Business hours shall not extend beyond 8:30 to 9:00 p.m. 5. Lot coverage shall 'not exceed 20%. All voted yes. DODD FARM ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall called the next public hearing of the evening in regard to the request of Robert Engstrom Associates, Inc. for preliminary plat consisting of 7 lots on 3.0 acres abutting the west side of Dodd Road, north of Golden Meadow Road, in the northwest quarter of Section 25. Mr. Runkle described the proposal briefly. Ms. Deb Schad, 4332 Stirrup Lane, requested consideration for the standing water problem in her lot and the adjacent property. Mr. Foertsch indicated that the drainage was being addressed in the proposed storm sewer plan. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. Lots 1 and 7 shall have their driveways connect to Haeg Court. 12 APC Minutes August 25, 1987 3. All runoff by the proposed Dodd Farm Addition shall be intercepted by storm sewer and conveyed into the existing storm sewer system in Stirrup Street. 4. This development shall also comply with the most recent requirements of the standard conditions of approval as adopted by Council action. 5. The existing barn and shed shall be removed. 6. The drainage system for the development shall provide for drainage of lots 4 and 5, Block 2, Overview Estates. All voted yes. BLACKHAWK RIDGE ADDITION - PD AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT & VARIANCE The next hearing of the evening convened by Mr. Hall was in regard to the applications of Meritor Development Company for preliminary plat for Blackhawk Ridge Addition. This plat consists of 64 single family lots on 27.2 acres, designated R -III and R -IV within the Blackhawk Park Planned Development. An amendment to the planned development will be necessary and a variance for the length of two cul-de-sacs. Mr. Runkle introduced the proposal. A representative of the developer, Mr. Larry Frank, was present and indicated that variances for the cul-de-sacs were necessary due to the topography, location and curvature of Blackhawk Hills Drive. He also indicated that park dedication had been completed and that some of the water described in conditions 9 and 11 may be converted to the neighboring development, per the request of that developer. McCrea moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the amendment to the PUD, to allow R -I development. All voted yes. McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. Construction fencing shall be installed on Lots 26, 27, 29, and 30, Block 1 abutting the park during the grading period. 3. This plat shall be subject to parks dedication fee if park dedication has not been completed. 4. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. 9 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 MERITOR DEVELOPMENT/BLACKHAWK RIDGE ADDITION F. Planned Development Amendment, Preliminary Plat and Variance as requested by Meritor Development Company for the Blackhawk Ridge Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 25, 1987 to consider application submitted by the Meritor Development Company for 1) a Planned Development Amendment to allow a single-family development on property originally designated as R -III and R -IV, 2) a preliminary plat consisting of 64 single-family lots entitled Blackhawk Ridge Addition and, 3) a variance for a cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet. The APC is recommending approval of all three (3) applications. For a copy of the Planning and Engineer ng Department report on this item, refer,to pages through �. For a copy of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commissio action on the proposed Blackhawk Ridge Addition, refer to page tO ® For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to pages � _ through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) an amendment to the planning and development redesignating the R -III and R -IV to a single-family status, 2) a preliminary plat consisting of 64 single-family lots. and, 3) a cul-de-sac exceeding the 500 feet requirement. 36 SUBJECT: P.D. AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT/VARIANCE (BLACKHAWK RIDGE ADDITION) APPLICANT: MERITOR DEVELOPMENT CO. LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 16 - NE 1/4 SECTION 21 EXISTING ZONING: R-3 & R-4 WITHIN THE BLACKHAWK PARK P.D. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 25, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 12, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINGEERING APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Blackhawk Ridge Addition. This plat consists of 64 single family lots on 27.2 acres designated R -III and R -IV within the Blackhawk Park Planned Development. An Amendment to the planned development will be necessary, however, no Amendment to the January 1987 Land Use Plan will be required since that plan designates this area D -II (0-6 Units/Acre). EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently the site is vacant. Adjacent land uses are: 35E to the east, Blackhawk Park to the south, the pending Stoney Point Addition also being proposed by Meritor Corp. to the north and R-1 zoned land owned by Sienna Corp. to the west that will be submitted for Preliminary Plat review by the City in the near future (Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition). A large mass of deciduous hardwood trees are on the northeast portion of the site. Grading the street and house pads will eliminate most or all of these trees, but this is the only feasible location to access this parcel of land. Another large mass of primarily oaks on the park property to the south will not be disturbed with this proposal. The rest of the site is scattered with immature trees and grassland. The site is buffered from 35E by a land form and will not be as visually impacted by the freeway as one might expect. SITE PLAN/CODE CONFORMANCE: A single access matching the one in Stoney Point to the north and from Blackhawk Hills Road will serve these lots and a connection to the west has been provided. This was done cooperatively with Sienna Corp. Those two plats will share a cul-de-sac (Street F) in excess of 500'. Street E is al.s.o longer than 500'. The project will be built in two phases with the second phase along the proposed Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition. Three or four builders are anticipated, all governed by a common set of covenants. The homes may range from $135,000-$250,000, increasing in value as you move south. The lots vary in size from 12,500 SF to 39,000 SF averaging 18,500 SF. All R-1 lot standards have been maintained and no individual lot variances have been requested. The gross density of the plat is 1.98 units/acre. 37 GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: Extensive grading is required in certain areas of the proposed development in order to provide suitable house pads. Street grades meet City requirements and have two areas of maximum 8% grades. Careful attention will be required in the grading of the rear and side lot lines in the areas where lots are proposed to handle the runoff from an adjacent lot. Side lot line and backyard drainage swale construction to provide the proper overland drainage is a critical item which must be addressed in the final grading plan to eliminate potential backyard and side lot line drainage problems. Storm sewer is proposed to intercept the street drainage and convey it to Blackhawk Lake. An existing 18" diameter storm sewer discharges into the '7roperty just west of this addition in the proposed Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition. The proposed storm sewer in Street F is required to provide the needed capacity for the runoff generated by the westerly adjacent proposed Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition. This will enable the storm sewer discharge from the. area to be carried to Blackhawk Lake as one outlet into the lake rather than two. An incomplete erosion and sediment control plan was submitted with the preliminary plat. A sediment basin designed according to Soil Conservation Service specifications shall be constructed adjacent to Blackhawk Lake before any site grading occurs. Drainage from the site should be directed into this basin rather than into Blackhawk Lake directly. Staff highly recommends that this basin be retained during both rough grading and the home building phase. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service for this area is provided by a 33" diameter trunk sanitary sewer which flows through the proposed development. The existing trunk sanitary sewer is adequately sized to accommodate the flows generated by the development. The development may want to assess the feasibility of relocating portions of the existing sanitary trunk into public right-of-way. The relocations in the public right-of-way will provide lateral service directly into the trunk and will allow for lots which are affected by the existing trunk sanitary sewer easements across them the flexibility of having these existing easements vacated. Care will need to be exercised during the grading operations where the existing trunk sanitary sewer is quite shallow in the low area by Blackhawk Lake. Manholes will need to be adjusted to meet the new grades. Water service will be provided by lateral water mains connected to the 8" diameter trunk main in Blackhawk Hills Road. The development is proposing to properly loop the water main system within the development. Water pressure in excess of 80 psi will be present at the lowest lots near Blackhawk Lake. Houses on these lots must be provided with pressure reducing valves in their water systems. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Initially, only one traffic outlet from this addition will be provided. This will be the connection north to Blackhawk Hills Road. The future connection through the proposed Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition to the west is planned to provide a second connection to Blackhawk Hills Road. The existing topography, Blackhawk Lake and I -35E all combine to provide justification for five cul-de-sacs within the development. The area has a relatively direct connection to the major street system through the Blackhawk Hills Road connection to Federal Drive and onto Yankee Doodle Road. Street A is proposed with a 60' right-of-way through the addition. Cul-de-sac streets are shown with 50' rights-of-way. All street construction shall be in accordance with City Codes and standards. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The proposed development will be responsible for providing all easements required fo,r the surface drainage, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water main systems and the park dedication along Blackhawk Lake. The development is required to phase his development in conjunction with the proposed Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition tQ ensure that the required right-of-way dedication for proposed Street F occurs. All regulatory agency permits shall be required in a timely manner as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed site has been previously assessed for sanitary sewer trunk and storm sewer trunk. The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval: PROD # DESCRIPTION USEAGE QTY RATE AMT 58 & 88 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit SF 1,540 cf $30.12/cf $46,385 ------- --------------- SF 11010 ff 15.06/cf 16,717 49 Water Area SF 27.2 ac. 1,250/ac. 34,000 TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS ....... $97,101 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on final plat .dimensions and rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 3�j CONDITIONS: BLACKHAWK RIDGE 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. Variances for cul-de-sac streets E and F in excess of 500' shall be approved. 3. Construction fencing shall be installed on lots 26, 27, 29, and 30, Block 1 abutting the park during the grading period. 4. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication Fee. -5. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. 6. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 7. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer and in accordance with City Codes and engineering standards and policies and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 8. All internal public streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way with City designed standards. 9. This development shall be responsible for providing adequate easements for the storm sewer outlet into Blackhawk Lake. 10. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in a time frame required by the affected agency. 11. This development shall be responsible for constructing the required outlet into Blackhawk Lake. 12. This plat shall be subject .to the recommendations of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission and approved by City Council. 13. This development shall be responsible for the construction of the storm sewer in Street F adequately sized to handle the runoff generated by the westerly adjacent proposed Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition. 14. The development shall be responsible for constructing and maintaining a sedimentation basin designed in accordance with the Soil Conservation Service specifications until such a time that all the development is completed. Y/o CONDITIONS: BLACKHAWK RIDGE 15. The development shall be responsible for submitting an erosion and sediment control plan including both a site map and a narrative in accordance with City of Eagan recommendations before a grading permit is issued or final plat is approved. 16. The development shall be responsible for either dedicating the required right-of-way for Street F or phasing the development in cooperation with the westerly adjacent proposed Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition to ensure the proper right-of-way for Street F. - ILI P 5IRWWA-0-11 - P 01-ck"Ilk Lak,, _ : 8';'CkhiWk 8 C f..- R-3 15.4 ac R-4 10. 6 a r-L—ice J �3 .BLACKHAVJK PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EAGAN MINNESOTA 1977 PUD CONTRACT UPDATED FOR j -75e RIGHT OF WAY NOVEMBER 1985 LAND USE R-1. Sin9w Family t2 u/ac) R-2. Mixed Residential (3-6 u/ac) R-3: Mixed Residential (6�12 u/ac) R-4 Multi -family (12+ u/ac) N.B. Neighborhood Business G.B. General Business C.S.C. Community Shopping Center P Park J NORTH 400 boo ll. 114 Mae :'1986 LAND USE PLAN -Emma Fj DEDICATED PARK LAND AIIIIIA DEVELOPED AREAS In r LO 4ctj to �� '•� 'may \\ ?'" �, -M'O-b 39S 9181sialul V V V J i N N N Ix N � m I Q O O J J L Y • Y � Y Y In r LO 4ctj to �� '•� 'may \\ ?'" �, -M'O-b 39S 9181sialul I... y!n@E �, • EPEE _ �� S ! �p � \� _ 'E7k.,o� r =a .. ) � 8- �•, I /,til%,'-� .-.r ,��' ��+ } Jr� •:f- '.,_-- `,e,> \\rl'�`�-� a .. i�,n�t"l�).,.�•-8^y9'ri: r- ^-�� g j!,ry � 1 ° ti.! f: f �" .......... cc r ' CD cc 3 m r m m V V V J i N N N Ix N � m I Q O O J J r Opl I �tip fill ; a�a G7777771S . � m tt 3131 v ilr� N _a !e}i m c D 3�� -cc i�p;p" a ■ ; p FF i jg b ■ J 1 I om '10 C m v v c J 9�i i �d� ay a e m m .Jo.. J -, _ m I... y!n@E �, • EPEE _ �� S ! �p � \� _ 'E7k.,o� r =a .. ) � 8- �•, I /,til%,'-� .-.r ,��' ��+ } Jr� •:f- '.,_-- `,e,> \\rl'�`�-� a .. i�,n�t"l�).,.�•-8^y9'ri: r- ^-�� g j!,ry � 1 ° ti.! f: f �" .......... cc r ' CD cc 3 m r m m �..... ._....4,.S.ar a.�..,tM. In _ r r •� f t 1 \ \ r t II'� � • m J'� `'� oyt/`�i�?, `•�'_�1,1•FI�, •��.�� ' - 1 _-"_ I '1.,1 �I•r -'t'� 1t '�l�"� �. 'I- �',f ` �}��4•_I• •'t._s.J �/ ��ay^�'��e��Ij�!` � �-��`- �� ''' .moi/ 3 .a r'il Y � a a= ... = 1 ,�� Y.'- :. . MI 'L / I � :.7,-: it. :�:Y' •fir'./T ...- _ C ro a a S v ro E CL m !T M Y 3 ro L x U ro m } =i ■ 1 � J a 3 ' J t •} i � a ?3 �i _ r r •� f t 1 \ \ r t II'� � • m J'� `'� oyt/`�i�?, `•�'_�1,1•FI�, •��.�� ' - 1 _-"_ I '1.,1 �I•r -'t'� 1t '�l�"� �. 'I- �',f ` �}��4•_I• •'t._s.J �/ ��ay^�'��e��Ij�!` � �-��`- �� ''' .moi/ 3 .a r'il Y � a a= ... = 1 ,�� Y.'- :. . MI 'L / I � :.7,-: it. :�:Y' •fir'./T ...- _ C ro a a S v ro E CL m !T M Y 3 ro L x U ro m 61.0 r950• --1, 71.4/8,9.0 90 WENT NT "IE I.G, D,) �atr1C 41 56.2/67. ,1. Di. 8 ,oil 55. 1027 3011 oil' 12Ll. CITY .... ...... HALL K 4'R 0001P sollill! 0011, 0100, ! .... 400 . ... ........ .. . ..... ..... .. 1IB" OEM -mom snow 7! Q2.7) 5 L " Ilk 6 M. G: STORAGE 124 44'.6/59.0 —,*, 2 4 r -GROUND J059 0 8 38.3/94.0 125 21.8 / 31.0 BLACKHAWK RIDGE ................. .................. ................. .................. SUBJECT PARCEL .................. ................. .................. ................. .................. �1 �O3 oO 2 CENT�k .56.6 na ,104 75.0 ? . 100 53.2/68. E s Y, sew "4 59.9/ 75:� FIG. *3 city of eaganapproved �- standard WATER plate PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN co DEPARTMENT 61.0 71.4/819.6 , / 90 80 i. II E N 7 i .;i 4L � �5 TREA�;MENT 0(� 68LS/84.0 PLANT "A ALL) 4T H iCet rS�. fp SITE b •- 1, " 'HEiGh (32 4.CLD,) P )r, irl C 56.2/67.OjT 2 N 0 91 7 �.I/ 92.0 v' 1j C 301 92 69-5/87."0 55.i/ 76-6�- 89 105.0 \(010 2 ¢8.1 /831 0' C' OD' 30 12" 93 60.4/7 301 " MV (LOOD 1 j F g.84.T 98.0 T;�u,Kv't' r 5 95 94 414 991 Y C RR CGJ ILACKH,•,K-.. ------- . ........... 59.5/ 9;3/C B 78.0 96.0 HILLS 7 8. 7:1.."-Q- ....... Sr 96 CITY 64.3/8 .0 L HALL 56.2/77.0 BLACKHANK 'Xz 4� - �xr PARK r I, �77 a 17 TJ- . . ......... . 51.7/67.0 TI 1113" D 123 /21 -ft"m -mom a "52.6/67.01 (127) 59':'p r -GROUND STORA61E, `124 GROUND 116 ca 811 -j 59 )10 126T'W' E •j L ib- 1 38.3/94.0 ---+'37.5 61 1 .0- (2�� I-- - (DippI 16 BLACKHAWK RIDGE ................. .................. ................. .................. .......... .. ... ................. SUBJECT PARCEL ............ .................. I I J1 103. ow 2 CIENTEP 72.0 I L 5 1175.0 (05)53.2/68. 120 59.9/75 1' ' 12° FIG. +3 City of eagan approved:- standard WATER plate #: Ifia' PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT ILI //HEIGrt H C rS ST ND1: /c7D- V PILOT Kph .. ...... ... ii 1 L CENTI20 It )r -u C I �5 :) \,\ , !. . I,, , " , NOF�,.L .!. !. 8 It fFJ,I A 0 D Tj ON \'k 44 $5" BIL ti,' K a F18 36 RE t. i4>09 AC K fit jy HILLS I 17 BLACKHA K PARK 33 Cr T . ... . ...... 0 Ld], ------- hiL-! ;.ItL;ALL A 27' C -K 17 A H 4 0 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS ED -DEPARTME BLACKHAWK RIDGE SUBJECT PARCEL SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN C-H I FIG. +2 approved:- standard I plate #: 0 ro `1 ..... �'.1'.:�-��•.•'.•:.' •11.111': z_ -._... {aid'' ;:�_a�'r:•' �1'�'�;.•.•:::•`•)C•:{•. ..�. ' .>rvs un .. •iiw.'v.1•_'__r :. ... -if:.•:%•-• •. r.•yU.•'•'�:•'�: • 'i1- •'�'�i-'�,•:°i.'.•. w� •'{..ter, ... .. - • . � . 3 :•�:• .':2> roc � :'i.�.:'.'7''}:�'�:.;-: > r • :-�1�L — , -.r _: .•�...`-a--.�'_.�• :.•.•.'-'• �T .moi..... H"a road 26 X. 7. fir:•;?.;:;.•:•:;:;.•-�••.•. ;:.�: • ' :.;_ �' � �• ;` r 'Pert r:io• • ,ig_.•.,.y'}.ei.c -'••:.':_;�-__, `:\ = tier• ", Blackhawk Lake `�� =�.•"r SANITARY LATERAL BENEFIT WATER AREA 27.2 AC City of eagan approved standard ED PUBLIC plate #: WORKS �LACKHAWK RIDGE DEPARTMENTLID MEMORANDUM TO: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: AUGUST 27, 1987 SUBJECT: BLACKHAWK RIDGE ADDITION Meritor Development Company is proposing a preliminary plat consisting of sixty-four (64) single family lots on thirty-two (32) acres, north of Black - hawk Park, but within the Blackhawk Park PUD. As part of the Blackhawk Park PUD agreement, this developer will not be required to pay a cash dedication fee, as the land dedication has been agreed to. Concerns of the department staff relate to extention of a trailway north and south from Blackhawk Lake to Blackhawk Hills Road. In the review with the developer, it was generally agreed that a trailway through the proposed Black - hawk Glen - 3rd Addition, to the west of this development would be preferred. Meritor Development and the developers for Blackhawk Glen Addition are coor- dinating their site planning, and a trailway connection is agreeable. One additional concern relates to construction of storm sewers with both developments, which will enter into Blackhawk Lake. The Engineering Depart- ment is requesting a sedimentation pond which would be contained within park property. Obviously, a sedimentation pond will be beneficial for maintaining lake quality, but concern for final design and construction remain. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending that this developer be responsible for coordinating and ensuring a trailway from Blackhawk Hills Road, south to the park property. Secondly, that a scenic easement preserving Oaks at the rear lot line be en- tered into. Thirdly, that required storm sewer outlets for this development through Black - hawk Park and Blackhawk Lake be reviewed by department staff. Fourthly, that the appropriate erosion control measures be strickly enforced. KV/bls 60 APC Minutes August 25, 1987 3. All runoff by the proposed Dodd Farm Addition shall be intercepted by storm sewer and conveyed into the existing storm sewer system in Stirrup Street. 4. This development shall also comply with the most recent requirements of the standard conditions of approval as adopted by Council action. 5. The existing barn and shed shall be removed. 6. The drainage system for the development shall provide for drainage of lots 4 and 5, Block 2, Overview Estates. All voted yes. BLACKHAWK RIDGE ADDITION - PD AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT & VARIANCE The next hearing of the evening convened by Mr. Hall was in regard to the applications of Meritor Development Company for preliminary plat for Blackhawk Ridge Addition. This plat consists of 64 single family lots on 27.2 acres, designated R -III and R -IV within the Blackhawk Park Planned Development. An amendment to the planned development will be necessary and a variance for the length of two cul-de-sacs. Mr. Runkle introduced the proposal. A representative of the developer, Mr. Larry Frank, was present and indicated that variances for the cul-de-sacs were necessary due to the topography, location and curvature of Blackhawk Hills Drive. He also indicated that park dedication had been completed and that some of the water described in conditions 9 and 11 may be converted to the neighboring development, per the request of that developer. McCrea moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the amendment to the PUD, to allow R -I development. All voted yes. McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. Construction fencing shall be installed on Lots 26, 27, 29, and 30, Block 1 abutting the park during the grading period. 3. This plat shall be subject to parks dedication fee if park dedication has not been completed. 4. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. 9 APC Minutes August 25, 1987 5. This development shall dedicate 10 feet drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 6. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer and in accordance with City Codes and engineering standards and policies and approved by staff prior to final plat approval.. 7. All internal public. streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way with City designed standards. 8. This development shall be responsible for providing adequate easements and constructing the storm sewer outlet into Blackhawk Lake, unless an alternate proposal is approved by staff, and agreed upon with neighboring developer. 9. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in a time frame required by the affected agency. 10. This plat shall be subject to the recommendations of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by City Council. 11. This development shall be responsible for the construction of the storm sewer in Street F adequately sized to handle the runoff generated by the westerly adjacent proposed Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition. 12. The development shall be responsible for constructing and maintaining a sedimentation basin designed in accordance with the Soil Conservation Service specifications until such a time that all the development is completed. 13. The development shall be responsible for submitting an erosion and sediment control plan including both a site map and a narrative in accordance with City of Eagan recommendations before a grading permit is issued or final plat is approved. 14. The development shall be responsible for either dedicating the required right-of-way for Street F or phasing the development in cooperation with the westerly adjacent proposed Blackhawk Glen 3rd Addition to ensure the proper right-of-way for Street F. All voted affirmatively. McCrea moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the variance for two cul-de-sacs in excess of 500 feet, due to the hardship created by the topography and street alignment. All voted yes. 621- 10 L 10 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ST FRANCIS WOODS 6TH ADDITION G. Rezoning, Richard Land Associates from R-4 to R-1 for a Preliminary Plat Entitled St. Francis Woods 6th Addition Consisting of 34 Lots --The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 25 meeting to consider applications submitted by Richard Land Associates for the rezoning of approximately 21 acres from R-4 to R-1 and a preliminary plat consisting of 34 lots entitled St. Francis Woods 6th Addition. The APC is recommending approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. The approvals were conditional upon a neighborhood meeting being conducted before the City Council meeting of September 15. For additional information and a copy of he Planning- nd Engineering Department report, refer to pages through . The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission met on September 3 and are recommending 1) a cash dedication requirement and 2) that the landowner insure the trailway on Lexington Avenue as required in the St. Francis Woods 5th Addition. For a copy of the APC minutes on ;.:nis item, refer to pages through �. In response to the concerns raised at the Planning Commission meeting of August 25, the developer met with representatives of the St. Francis Woods Condominium on September 3 to further discuss and resolve those issues. Enclosed on pages through 3 is a summary of how those items were resolved. In regard to tlYe access onto Lexington Avenue, the Public Works Director has contacted Dakota County to verify that the removal of the existing condominium entrance will be incorporated in the future county road project at no cost to the property owners in consideration of relocating this access opposite Falcon Way as a part of this proposed subdivision. After reviewing the economics involved of relocating the existing access on to Duckwood Drive to line up with existing Duckwood Trail, the engineering staff would be willing to delete that condition from approval if appropriate. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from R-4 to R-1 and preliminary plat entitled St. Francis Woods 6th Addition as presented. 5�3 SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT (ST FRANCIS WOOD 6TH ADDITION) APPLICANT: RICHARD LAND ASSOCIATES LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 15 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 25, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 10, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION: Separate applications have been submitted reut' i rezoning of Preliminary consists of Francis Wood the January Units/Acre). qes ng a 20.96 R-4 (Multiple) acres to R-1 (Single Family) and a Plat for the St. Francis Wood 6th Addition. This plat 34 lots south of Duckwood Drive and east of other St. Townhouse Additions. This proposal is consistent with 1987 Land Use PLan that designates this area D-11 (0-6 EXISTING CONDITIONS: This site is heavily wooded containing a variety of mature deciduous trees on rolling topography. Three ponding areas add aesthetically to the site which is extremely well suited for upper bracket housing. The undeveloped agricultural land to the south is designated D-1 (03 Units/Acre) in the January 1987 Land Use Plan. SITE PLAN: In 1984, there was a town house development proposed consisting of 134 units; approximately 24 units have been constructed. Access to these -units are through a private drive and with access points on Lexington and Duckwood. The Duckwood access is proposed to be a -public street; Duckwood Trail on north side of Duckwood is not offset properly according to City ordinances. This new plat should require lining up the street, or provide proper offset distance. A proposed street will be looped from, Duckwood Drive to Lexington Avenue and have 3 cul-de-sacs connecting to it on the west. These cul-de-sacs will have center islands for plantings similar to those at Chatterton Ponds. All lots meet R-1 requirements and vary in size from 14,000 SF to 45,000 SF. s� GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading plan for the proposed development addresses mostly street grading. A limited amount of grading is proposed outside of the street right-of-way adjacent to Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block 1 and Lots 12, 16 and 17 of Block 2. Proposed street grades are in accordance with City of Eagan requirements. Drainage on this site is proposed to be conveyed either directly or indirectly into Pond JP -65. Pond JP -65 is a designated ponding area in the City of Eagan Comprehensive Storm Sewer Guide. The specific details of the storm sewer design and drainage requirements will be addressed in the feasibility report covering the public improvements necessary to serve the site. An incomplete erosion and sediment control plan was submitted with the preliminary plat application. An item of major concern is preventing sediment from entering Pond JP -65 which in turn drains into Hurley Lake. Specific erosion and sediment control measures needed to contain sediment on site and out of Pond JP -65 are required to be maintained during rough grading and the home building phase. UTILITIES: Water and sanitary sewer to this site have been petitioned by the developer for installation under a public improvement contract. The public improvement must be ordered in by Council action prior to final plat approval. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the site is proposed in two locations. One proposed access location is from Lexington Avenue across from Falcon Way. The proposed access location is subject to the requirements as outlined in the attached letter from Dakota County Highway Department. The second access location is proposed at Abbey Way just south of Duckwood Drive. Additional right-of-way is needed before this connection can be made. The existing Abbey Way access to Duckwood Drive is required to be moved west to line up with Duckwood Trail on the north side of Duckwood Drive. The acqui- sition of the additional right-of-way needed to serve this develop- ment shall become the responsibility of the development. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed parcel was previously assessed for storm sewer trunk, sanitary sewer trunk, water area, water lateral benefit and street improvements for Duckwood Drive and Lexington Avenue. The parcel is subject to the possible additional assessments which will be identified under petition number 517. The approximate cost of installation of the required public utilities to serve the site will be identified in the feasibility report for the improvements. In addition to the assessments which will be identified in the feasibility report, the development is responsible for the water lateral benefit at the rate of $12.47 per front foot for the 370 feet of frontage along Duckwood Drive. The existing frontage and the proposed rate equate to a total proposed assessment of $4,613.90. A final assessment amount will be determined using rates in effect at the time of final plat approval and based on final plat dimensions and areas. 65 r CONDITIONS: ST FRANCIS WOODS 6TH ADDITION 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The cul-de-sac islands shall be maintenance free with no rock near the edge. A separate maintenance agreement shall be included with the final plat submission and reviewed by the City Attorney. 3. The development shall be responsible for negotiating the necessary agreements with the easterly adjacent condominium development necessary for Dakota County to allow the proposed Lexington Avenue access opposite Falcon Way. 4. . This development shall also comply with the most recent requirements of the standard conditions of approval as adopted by Council action. 5. The development shall be responsible for acquiring the right- of-way necessary to provide access to Duckwood Drive opposite Duckwood Trail. _ft STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Riqhts-of-Wa 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private prbperty or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements oto incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to.final plat approval. r 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. (OVER)1�1 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Imorovements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: Rev ised: STANDARD LTS82 DAKOTA COUNTY SURVEY DEPARTMENT 7300 WEST 147th STREET, SUITE 4300 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Att: Dale Runkle, City Planner RE: ST. FRANCIS WOOD 6TH ADDITION Dear Mr. Runkle: GARY H. STEVENSON, R.L.S. COUNTY SURVEYOR (612) 431-1153 APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124 August 12, 1987 The Dakota County Plat Commission met on August 10, 1987, to consider the preliminary plat of ST. FRANCIS WOOD 6TH ADDITION. Said plat is adjacent to CO. RD. #43 and is, therefore, subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. This is a replat of Outlot D of ST FRANCIS WOOD 4TH ADDITION. Outlot D contains restricted access along its entire length with Co. Rd. #43. This preliminary plat now requests an access to Co. Rd. #43 opposite Falcon Way to the east. Letter dated April 10, 1987, from Thomas Colbert explains the property ownership situation and why this, new access point is being proposed. Present access to the Condominium development is located approximately 300 feet north. For the new access point to be allowed, the County Board will have to release the dedicated restrictive access. The Plat Commission's recommendation is not to release the restriction without the present access 300 feet north being closed and restriction of access deeded to Dakota County. The Plat Commission concurs with Mr. Colbert's opinion that this new access will be a much more desirable location from an engineering and safety situation. The location of Falcon Way meets the spacing standards for a possible future traffic light location. The present Condominium development could easily route its access to this new road as shown on the preliminary plans. If the developer could obtain the necessary agreements with the Condominium owners, the Plat Commission will recommend approval of this plat. County staff feels this will create a much safer intersection. Present situation with offset intersections will provide difficulty for left turns. With the greater volume of traffic predicted for Lexington Avenue, the problem will worsen with time. This is an excellent opportunity to correct the situation. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER If the developer is successful with the change in access, the latest plan showing an island at this entrance will not be recommended. The lanes should align opposite the lanes in Falcon Way to eliminate conflicts with opposing left turning traffic. The plan should be resubmitted with the changes. No additional right of way is required. Present plats show 60 feet dedicated. No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Highway Department. Sincerely yours, Gary H. Stevenson Dakota County Surveyor Plat Commission Secretary cc: Probe Engineering Dave Everds, County Highway Engineer Tom Swanson, Permits Technician Tom Colbert, Public Works Director Richard Land Associates GHS:vf 11 cr'T cr.. w m O�LEAR7 PAR IARRIA MILCS GOLF! COURSE [COURSE f4- jAl $rA RX' L J I lo IN TA L rvrw CARRI HILL GOI COUR! GC L T1 &SC 6 LB R-� l,rA Y PA R-? Rod CRO?SOF try CARRI HILL GOI COUR! GC L T1 I••• Y7i— I y ' � . 4 _ 1 I I • ` W / � ��J 6+�1 ��- I I • I a GOP �1, 3xrIM1Lx � L--- •„ ....v.w • w.nrM\OOOM 7 0 �< iz a a 9 U � WO s a ...ul 1 8 R v O i 1 ]� a -^ NOl`JNIX41 S, —�-- �'- 3nN3AV 1—i—T--- pq I••• Y7i— I y ' � . 4 _ 1 I I • ` W / � ��J 6+�1 ��- I I • I a GOP �1, 3xrIM1Lx � L--- •„ ....v.w • w.nrM\OOOM 1 13i i 7�IZL1I t ., Mj' J ire.:•i Q 3 t W moo. Vs U awl -W I i <i F- O !; ;• J IO �O y�pp 13 -"+✓7d I�N/1t37! .y.�r. ; Z � _.__-�-- c � �'' ' lam- �' �' ~• � 4 _ IV Ir— _--� 'fix'- a*�y �4 ,, r-. •�•� ",iXX ,. I I { ` ,', ,� � ,' {, '� ` •�f � Kiri^�� — � �" �� ,. .ham- -'i ``•r�.rF ".I•�•l,� Y '--�y :�Y , �IIF�1�``^��•111 .1' moi:• �. ,� r�� tJ =yl 3+•wl+Jn Q It � „ bi gC IO �O y�pp 13 -"+✓7d I�N/1t37! .y.�r. ; Z � _.__-�-- c � �'' ' lam- �' �' ~• � 4 _ IV Ir— _--� 'fix'- a*�y �4 ,, r-. •�•� ",iXX ,. I I { ` ,', ,� � ,' {, '� ` •�f � Kiri^�� — � �" �� ,. .ham- -'i ``•r�.rF ".I•�•l,� Y '--�y :�Y , �IIF�1�``^��•111 .1' moi:• �. ,� r�� tJ =yl 3+•wl+Jn Q It � „ bi C z 3 i \ yr rf uc�{ y �• a I 3nN3AAVV—NNOIDNI%31 _ Y _ 4 Z }} yy 4� �3t } 4f ;II al. Tsai a�Zip lZ\ ivw4r ii �� illll V W f! 1y ;II al. Tsai i ❑ 3.e= i 3 Q Vr F- �� d0� Ey • 5 q� i w3 b $ tltl LLI i..: 95516�sEI co m! lnill 91 1; E 8i 1111iiii s�3E: 2 9°sa �y17. al i5 ii_ '•:�? :i 3i 3! 4 31 f• � f r � 1' 3 i o Z ! J O_ 0 F - z U Q O = I• - m (p cc Q w 0 00 W .N z U a Z Qa ❑ LL LL z H ❑ u z Q a m . rL 3? _3a s 3j 33 _ S .i•� -aa ijy st�.?"�+1. j'•Y.I� - = 1 ! —^� p ii -A 3 !LLI 31'- ❑ _: l 1. 3 p W Z=- � ¢ 7 ��✓ ca m _ cc zV f! 1y ;II al. Tsai i ❑ 3.e= i 3 Q Vr F- �� d0� Ey • 5 q� i w3 b $ tltl a 1lfi 95516�sEI m! lnill 91 1; E 8i 1111iiii s�3E: �y17. al i5 t:filf 2gg5: 523Se: 3 i o Z ! J O_ 0 F - z U Q O = I• - m (p cc Q w 0 00 W .N z U a Z Qa ❑ LL LL z H ❑ u z Q a m . rL 3? _3a s 3j 33 _ S .i•� -aa ijy st�.?"�+1. j'•Y.I� - = 1 ! —^� p ii -A 3 !LLI 31'- ❑ _: l 1. 3 p W Z=- � ¢ 7 ��✓ ca m _ cc zV LU U ❑ i 3 Q Vr w3 b $ 3 i o Z ! J O_ 0 F - z U Q O = I• - m (p cc Q w 0 00 W .N z U a Z Qa ❑ LL LL z H ❑ u z Q a m . rL 3? _3a s 3j 33 _ S .i•� -aa ijy st�.?"�+1. j'•Y.I� - = 1 ! —^� p ii -A 3 !LLI 31'- ❑ _: l 1. 3 p W Z=- � ¢ 7 ��✓ ca m _ cc zV 9 t 43.8/68.6 ZItMVILt (� 48D 8,72 Lt $10T\QN /A '551 Tv DITION . (I c7a P 363.11 74.0 8 47 71 4�.9/75:'0 62.0 40.4/e�.4 419/60.0 207"ANKFF nno]069 rnm) 18" L 71' CIT HALL \jq rs 7 QD5 53.2168. -city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME I - I I 01i) 811A it `11 50.3/75.0 G9) 18,11 91 12 615/80.0 68 (a 1811 I I 67 66 TollR0,3.6/ 72.0 61.6 R( ADDITION ....... .......... C A R R I A G E 18 HILLS GOLF COURSE DOCKWOOD `.TRAILS 110 43.3/650. 6: _4 & 50.3/67.0 181 m IVAN 007- 4, n i 112 50.4/67.0 /BI.O 16 54 6/71 0 ST. FRANCIS WOOD 6TH ADDITION .................. SUBJECT PARCEL .................. ................. WATER MAST,ER PLAN FIG. #3 approved standard Plate #: 16'; T /,.70-6- 66.3'%15ICDT KNOB ',10�-300..w•24 at 3F 11* y 30" -,'' I - - -! CENTE7_-F'%-j N E; Z77 - 71' CIT HALL \jq rs 7 QD5 53.2168. -city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME I - I I 01i) 811A it `11 50.3/75.0 G9) 18,11 91 12 615/80.0 68 (a 1811 I I 67 66 TollR0,3.6/ 72.0 61.6 R( ADDITION ....... .......... C A R R I A G E 18 HILLS GOLF COURSE DOCKWOOD `.TRAILS 110 43.3/650. 6: _4 & 50.3/67.0 181 m IVAN 007- 4, n i 112 50.4/67.0 /BI.O 16 54 6/71 0 ST. FRANCIS WOOD 6TH ADDITION .................. SUBJECT PARCEL .................. ................. WATER MAST,ER PLAN FIG. #3 approved standard Plate #: i !JL 1 x l t'f?i ae 1 ys I ---• j " I—t•---� � I � \ `$ � •.'�:lL'K bl•'r^:" TFia1C s DUCKWOOD 1 �Sr fxar:a� -.•r r �I z ,To L-� 61/Mx'L:1 TTEiJ WATER LATERAL BENEFIT 370 F.F. 'L--- I DRr = �' I�, I 4� I 1• rt 6 _ ,--j ST. FRANCIS WOOD 6TH ADDITION 1 17 C ltd/ of eagan approved: standard plate #: PUBLIC WORKS 10 co DEPARTMENT 67 APC Minutes August 25, ST. FRANCIS WOODS 6TH ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall then called the public hearing on the separate applications of Richard Land Associates requesting a rezoning of 20.96 R-4 (Multiple) acres to R-1 (Single Family), and a preliminary plat for the St. Francis Woods 6th Addition. Mr. Runkle described the plat consisting of 34 acres south of Duckwood Drive and east of other St. Francis Woods townhouse additions. He indicated the proposal was consistent with the January 1987 Land Use Plan and designates the area as D -II (0-6 units per acre). Mr. Ralph Wagner appeared on behalf of the developer and indicated that the rezoning would result in a reduction from 134 units to 34 units. He also indicated that in his opinion, the applicant could not possibly line up its street with Duckwood Trail to the north. He did indicate that the County requested that the development's street line up with Falcon Way to the east. Mr. Tom Minnelli, indicated he represented the Homeowner's Association for the condominium built in accord with the original plat. He indicated that the original developer had withdrawn and that the proposal now is being made by the owner. He also advised that the people in his development had not been properly noticed, having received materials "dropped off" on the previous Friday. He expressed concern in regard to the use of their private road and the potential buffer to the rear of their development. Mr. Tony Cammer, 3635 St. Francis Woods, submitted a letter from Mr. Jim Horst, indicating his opinion that the developer mislead the owners in the condominiums, and that common area has been lost. A copy of the letter is attached hereto. In response to Chairman Hall's questions, Mr. Runkle indicated that the abstractor's list had been inaccurate. Mr. Joseph Christensen, an attorney representing Richard Land Associates, appeared and indicated under Statute and Ordinance, an error in the notice does not necessarily invalidate the proceeding. He also suggested that the owner was not party to the promises made to the condominium owners and that the condominium document itself, gave notice that the remainder of the outlots in the plat may not be developed as condominiums. He also suggested that the private street in the condominium for the project was subject to easements in Iavor of the additional land. Mr. Gene Lange appeared and indicated that the proposed street may be too close to his home in regard to proper setbacks. Mr. Tom Healy, the President of Timberton, the previous developer, was present and indicated his support of the R -I development. APC Minutes August 25, 1987 Harrison moved for a continuance. There being no second, the motion failed. McCrea questioned whether the condominium owners were against the project and whether the time between the present meeting and the City Council meeting could be used to address those concerns. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning. All voted in favor except Harrison and Voracek who voted no, and the Chair abstained to prevent any potential appearance of conflict of interest. McCrea moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The cul-de-sac islands shall be maintenance free with no rock near the edge. A separate maintenance agreement shall be included with the final plat submission and reviewed by the City Attorney. 3. The development shall be responsible for negotiating the necessary agreements with the easterly adjacent condominium development necessary for Dakota County to allow the proposed Lexington Avenue access opposite Falcon Way. 4. This development shall also comply with the most recent requirements of the stapdard conditions of approval as adopted by Council action. 5. The development shall be responsible for acquiring the right-of-way necessary to provide access to Duckwood Drive opposite Duckwood Trail. 6. The developers shall meet with the condominium owners at least one week prior to the City Council meeting. 7. The proposed street shall meet setback requirements for the southerly townhome. 8. The possibility of a stub street to the south shall be subject to staff review and approval. All voted yes, except Harrison and Wilkins who voted no, and Chairman Hall abstained for the same reason as above. *' OLSEN, SNELLING & CHRISTRINS- < ., P.A. STANLEY C. OLSEN, JR. ATTORNEYS AT LAW OF COUNSEL RONALD L. SNELLING SUITE 307 WALTER C. GUSTAFSON JOSEPH J. CHRISTENSEN 6200 WILLSON ROAD THOMAS A. BRIANT MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 66424 ROBERT P. LAUE TELEPHONE (612) 827.6866 September 9, 1987 Owners of St. Francis Wood Condominium Units RE: St. Francis Wood 6th Addition Dear St. Francis Wood Condominium Owners: This letter is being written to set forth the substance of the conversations which occurred at a meeting on the evening of September 3, 1987. The meeting was attended by Mr. and Mrs. Carmen Tuminelly and other owners of the St. Francis Wood Condominiums ( the "Condominiums"), as well as Mr. Thomas Healy (on behalf of Timberton Co.), Mr. Richard M. Geifer (on behalf of Richard Land Associates, the "Developer"), Mr. Ralph Wagner of Probe Engineering and, the undersigned, Mr. Joseph Christensen, as the attorney for the Developer. The purpose of the meeting was to comply with the request of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission that the Developer of the St. Francis Wood 6th Addition single family subdivision ( the "Proposed Development"), meet with the owners of the St. Francis Wood Condominiums (the "Condominium Owners") to discuss and attempt to resolve various issues which have been raised in connection with the Proposed Development. The issues discussed and the Developer's agreement with regard to each issue is as follows: 1. Access to Lexington Avenue. The Condominium Owners are unwilling to participate in closing the existing access onto Lexington Avenue in exchange for a new access onto Lexington to be developed opposite Falcon Way unless the costs of closing the existing access and restoring the areas occupied by it are born by parties other than the Condominium Owners. In the event parties other than the Condominium Owners agree to pay for the costs of closing and restoring the existing access area, including landscaping, the Condominium Owners are agreeable to closing the existing access in preference for one opposite Falcon Way. The Developer is not willing to bear the costs of closing and restoring the existing access area. Mr. Wagner and I will explore the possibility of having these costs paid for by Dakota County and/or the City of Eagan in conjunction with the upgrading and widening of Lexington Avenue which is projected to occur within the next two years. An additional possibility would be to use the escrow held by the City of Eagan for a tot lot, which Mr. Healy mentioned, if the city would consent to this use of these funds. 76 e St. Francis Wood Condominium Owners Page 2 September 9, 1987 The timing of closing the existing access and opening the new access should be coordinated with the city and county and the specific manner in which the existing access area would be restored and landscaped will be specified in a written agreement with the party or parties agreeing to do the work. In the event the existing access to Lexington Avenue cannot be closed, restored and landscaped without cost to the Condominium Owners, the proposed new access opposite Falcon Way will be eliminated from the Proposed Development which will obtain access to Lexington Avenue over the existing roads in the Condominium, pursuant to the existing easements. 2. Restrictive Covenants. Restrictive covenants will be placed against all of the lots in the Proposed Development prior to the sale of any of the lots. The restrictive covenants will include a prohibition against unnecessary removal of vegetation within thirty feet of the most easterly lot lines of the lots lying immediately westerly of the Condominiums. If the vegetation is required to be disturbed in connection with development activities such as installation of utilities, storm sewer lines, or grading, etc., the Developer or lot owner will be required to plant appropriate screen vegetation. The restrictive covenants will also require the purchaser of each lot to submit plans as well as a fee to the Developer's architect and/or engineer for review and approval prior to the commencement of construction to ensure that the restrictive covenants are being adhered to and that the architectural integrity of the Proposed Development and neighboring Condominiums will not be impaired. The restrictive covenants will also require attached garages, prohibit out buildings and will prohibit swimming pools on the three lots lying immediately westerly of the existing pond on the west side of the Condominiums. Prior to finalizing and recording the restrictive covenants, the Developer will provide copies to the Condominium Owners for their review and input. The final terms of the restrictive covenants, however, will remain subject to the Developer's final judgment except as is otherwise specified in this letter. 3. Access To Duckwood Drive. The plan to access Duckwood Drive over the existing internal street, without requiring the Developer to move and relocate the street further to the west to align it with Duckwood Trail to the north, is agreeable to the Condominium Owners. The Condominium Owners have given their support to the Developer's request that the Proposed Development be approved without requiring relocation of this access further to the west as proposed in the city staff report. 71 J St. Francis Wood Condominium Owners Page 3 September 9, 1987 4. Single Family Lots Around Access Onto Duckwood Drive. The Condominium Owners do not oppose a request which may be made in the future by the Developer and/or Mr. Healy, on behalf of Timberton Co., to rezone and subdivide the three existing condominium lots in the most northwesterly portion of the condominium subdivision as single family lots. 5. Dedication Of Internal Roads. The existing internal private roadways serving the Condominiums and the property owned by Timberton Co. to the north, are presently private roadways. In connection with the Developer's discussions with the City of Fagan concerning the approval of the Proposed Development, the Developer will encourage the city to accept the existing internal private roadway system as public streets. If the city is willing to accept the roadways as public streets, the Condominium Owners and Timberton Co. will join in a grant dedicating the existing forty foot wide parcel within which the streets are presently located, as well as an additional ten feet, to the city for public right of way. This dedication will not include any obligation of the Condominium Owners to alter existing improvements or incur additional expenses in connection with the roadway dedications. In connection with this proposal, the Developer will advise the city that, in respect of the additional undeveloped lots owned by Timberton Co., variances for setback from a public roadway must be granted in order to permit construction of additional condominium buildings on those lots in accordance with the original concept plan. 6. Realignment Of Roadways. The Developer has agreed to make alterations to certain portions of roadways the Developer plans to develop to serve the lots in the Proposed Development in accordance with drawings presented to the Condominium Owners on the evening of September 3, 1987. These alterations will include shifting the east -west portion of the new roadway located to the south of the most southerly existing Condominium units, to the south. The north -south segment of the roadway lying west of the pond abutting the existing Condominium units on the west side will also be moved to the west to allow for somewhat larger lots on the west side of the pond. 7. Signs on Lexington Avenue. In the event of the construction of a new access onto Lexington Avenue, located opposite Falcon Way, the Developer will landscape and provide space for signs for the Condominiums and a sign for the single family homes on the parcel of property which will remain just north of the new access onto Lexington Avenue and south of the Condominium property. Plans for the signs which will be placed 7;--- T j St. Francis Wood Condominium Owners Page 4 September 9, 1987 in this area will be subject to the review and approval of the Condominium Owners and Timberton Co., prior to installation. 8. Screening By Condominium Owners and Timberton Co. The Condominium Owners and Timberton Co. will agree to maintain a thirty foot vegetation and screening area on the most westerly end of the Condominium lots abutting the Proposed Development. The foregoing is intended to be a statement of the issues concerning the Condominium Owners and Timberton Co. together with a statement of the agreements the Developer has made with respect to each of these issues. The foregoing will apply to the development of the Proposed Development as a single family neighborhood in accordance with the presentation made to the Planning Commission of August 25, 1987 and as modified by the drawings shown to the Condominium Owners on the evening of September 3, 1987. The foregoing agreements, as contained in this letter, will not be considered binding upon the Developer in the event the Proposed Development is not given all required or necessary approvals prior to December 31, 1987, or in the event of prior sale of the property to another developer for development in accordance with an alternate plan or in the event the Proposed Development is not developed for other reasons. It is the Developer's intent that the terms and conditions of this letter be provided to the City of Eagan for its review and may be made a part of the approvals granted by the city for the Proposed Development. JJC/bc Very truly yours, Yours very truly, OLSEN, SNELLING-_& CHRISTENSEN, P.A. 73 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 PD/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PRELIMINARY PLAT CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION H. Planned Development Amendment, Conditional Use Permit for a Pylon Sign and a Preliminary Plat Entitled Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 25, 1987, to consider three (3) applications requesting 1) a planned development amendment to allow an automotive service center on LB designated land, 2) a preliminary plat entitled Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition and 3) a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign. The APC is recommending denial of the applications to the City Council. For a copy of the report as prepared by the Planning and Engineering Departments on these applications, refer to pages through Com. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission met at—their September 3, 1987, meeting and is recommending that a cash donation be required if the City Council should approve the preliminary plat. For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the planned development amendment, conditional use permit for a pylon sign, and a preliminary plat entitled Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition. ;V SUBJECT: PD DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PYLON SIGN) CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION APPLICANT: AUSTIN COMPANIES LOCATION: OUTLOT A, CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK, SE 1/4 SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONING: LB WITHIN CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 25, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 13, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Planned Development Amendment to allow an automotive service center on LB (Limited Business) designated land within the Cedar Cliff Commerical Park P.D. and a Preliminary Plat for the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition. This 1.83 acre one lot plat is located on the north side of Cliff Road between Cliff Drive and Scott Trail and is currently a portion of Outlot A of the 1st Addition. Immediately to the north is the Building Block Addition (day care center). Before any final approvals can occur in that area, the storm water issue must be resolved. In an effort to do so, the Building Block Addition will be replatted into the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 4th Addition as Lot 1 and the remaining area to the northwest will become Outlot A with a drainage and utility easement for the ponding area. It is anticipated that the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 4th Addition will be scheduled for the September APC meeting. SITE PLAN/CODE_C_ONFORMANCE: This 15,170 SF automotive service center will have four main tennants: Tires Plus, Lavells Auto Parts (retail sales only), Muffler Pro and an undetermined user. A single access from Cliff Drive matching that of the shopping center to the west will serve this site. All building and parking setbacks meet code requirements. Sixty-seven exterior parking stalls have been provided and eighteen are proposed as service bays within the building (85 total). If a strict 'retail only' sales parking ratio were -used, 101 stalls would be required. At the 30,000 SF Car Care Center along Pilot Knob Road and Duckwood Drive, 143 stalls were approved in that site plan. That also included 19 that would be shared with a proposed restaurant site. Austin Companies is also proposing a similar 17,000 + SF project in Eden Prairie with 88 stalls. It appears that parking should be sufficient for this proposal since most uses are short term and the total 'retail only' space is 5,870 SF. All stalls are 10' wide except for the 26 designated employee only ones on the rear side of the building. The lot coverage is 19% in a 20% (LB) district. The building itself will be constructed of face brick, precast concrete and prefinished aluminum. The proposed main color will closely resemble the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center -- adding to the continuity of the Planned Development. The applicant is aware that no roof top mechanical equipment shall be visible. The trash will be contained completely in the building and no exterior storage has been proposed. The landscape plan works well conceptually - all sizes and species are acceptable. The proposed pylon sign is located on the southeast corner of the site - over 300' from the shopping center sign. The detailed design has not been completed but all code requirements would be adhered to. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed auto mall site occupies Lot 1 of the proposed Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd _Add-ition. Lot 1 is bounded by Cliff Road on the south, Cliff Drive on the west, and Scott Trail on the east. The proposed grading plan generally conforms to the existing grades of Cliff Drive and Scott Trail. Drainage along the northerly edge of Lot 1 is proposed to be provided by a deep swale into which all drainage from Lot 1 and Lot 2 is directed. This drainage swale is shown initially to drain northwest into a regraded portion of the existing pond. When the outlet to Pond AP -50 (lying easterly of Scott Trail) is provided in the future, the drainage from Lot 1 and Lot 2 is required to be directed east into Pond AP -50. Considering the elevations proposed for the Building Block Child Daycare Center on Lot 2 and the auto mall on Lot 1, this alternate is the most feasible permanent drainage plan for these two lots. The study of the outlet to Pond AP -50 has considered this eventuality. The developer shall escrow the necessary funds to provide the required storm sewer and to fill and relandscape the swale in the future when the Pond AP -50 outlet is constructed. The storm sewer system which conveys the water from the drainage swale between Lots 1 and 2 into the proposed pond on Outlot A will need to be abandoned at that time. No grading plan for the ultimate use of Lot 3 is provided. Much of the existing lower area on Lot 3 and on Outlot A is shown to be regraded to provide a small but deep detention pond. The bottom elevation of the pond is proposed at elevation 888.0 and the overflow outlet elevation is proposed at 900.0._ (The pond outlet is connected to the storm sewer system which ultimately discharges into Pond AP -9.) A pond with a depth of approximately twelve feet below the outlet is of questionable value for storm water drainage purposes. It is recommended that the bottom elevation be raised to approximately two to three feet below the controlled outlet elevation. This proposed elevation is low enough to receive storm water temporarily from Lots 1 and 2 and can ultimately serve as a permanent ponding area for the balance of this site. The dependable storage volume of this pond is not increased by the proposed greater depth. A permanent ponding easement should be provided for the pond and the maintenance of the pond should remain with the property draining into it. No erosion and sediment controplan was submitted as a part of this application. /�J UTILITIES: The existing sanitary sewer and water lines in Cliff Drive are of adequate capacity and depth to serve this development. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The development is proposing to take access to the site from westerly adjacent Cliff Drive in one location. Dakota County will be requiring dedication of restricted access along the entire border with Cliff Road. Traffic circulation throughout the site can be easily accomplished for cars and single -axle trucks without encroachment into the parking stalls. A semitrailer -type unit would not be able to make turning maneuvers without encroachment into the parking stall areas. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS: The proper easements will be -required for the proposed pond, its outlet, and for the future storm sewer to be constructed in the swale between proposed Lots 1 and 2. Adequate street rights-of-way have been provided for Cliff Drive and Scott Trail. Adequate right-of-way is shown to be provided with the platting to accommodate Cliff Road. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired from the appropriate agency in the proper time frame. ASSESSMENTS: The parcel proposed for platting as Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition has been assessed for the following public utilities at the commercial/industrial rate: sanitary sewer trunk, water area, storm sewer trunk, sanitary sewer lateral benefit, water lateral benefit, water area upgrade, and water lateral benefit. The proposed parcel will be required to pay its proposed assessment for trailway along Cliff Road as a condition of final plat approval. The trailway assessment is identified at the rate of $12.49 per front foot for the frontage along Cliff Road which is 285.38 front feet. The rate and the total front footage equate to a total proposed assessment of $3,564.00. All final assessment obligations will be calculated on the quantities and dimensions of the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. 77 CONDITIONS: CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PK 3RD ADDITION 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. No exterior storage, sales or displays shall be permitted. 3. No roof top mechanical equipment shall be permitted. 4. The pylon sign shall be no taller than the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center sign and contain no more than 125 SF of signage per side. All building mounted signage shall be compatible and uniform in size. All signage shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50 SF. -5. The detailed landscape plan shall -be submitted on a grading plan. The financial guarantee shall not be released until - 1 year after the date of installation. 6. 26 employee parking stalls with a 9' width shall be permitted. 7. The development shall be responsible for the cost of construction of the required storm sewer to convey the runoff from Lots 1 and 2 into the existing storm sewer system in Scott Trail when the outlet for Pond AP -50 is constructed. g. The proposed pond bottom elevation shall not be more than three feet below the controlled water elevation of the ponding area. 9. The development shall modify its proposed site plan to provide adequate room for turning maneuvers of tractor/trailer-type unit. 10. This development shall also comply with the most recent requirements of the standard conditions of approval as adopted by Council action. S STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Wa ,1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate Jurisdictional agency. 4. This development, shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. 7�(OVER) STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: Revised: STANDARD SA LTS12 1 � 1 4: • �t%tsr i:.�� ej' r.re Sc •% S'• Sa: — _ ��n..3. v SO`/6'38-W30. C0•;, �w�'1 ''� o P4. ter;• Q - �-• ,71 7 1- /V O'/6�JO''V✓ NO'�O.23 E 5_Z7.9/t r ' I r• VNI• _ 4: � v SO`/6'38-W30. C0•;, �w�'1 ''� o P4. ter;• Q / ,71 7 r PIN vp 03 .. 3103. 96 • fHI •1• •1�, - - (�i CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL 8t . . . . . . . . . . Q :61 4 z i Ria t iL t� I l, •� f- i ka —_ I �- ----+------- ; �--�---_• Irl I ,yjr I mp__-. t� I l, •� f- a I 1 �iiil�ll e: - � fX z U� Oa •6, Q aQ• 4z h � mp__-. el�ln t� I l, •� A I �iiil�ll e: - � a _y x §I I al I i ^ 3i n V.1: ..�v1.0 • J9v Z^� I _ I "+ S e ' -'tom eeuQ 33110.1, el�ln •� A I I �iiil�ll e: - � a _y el�ln •� I I eey it �B� e: - _ a I I I I tl r 11 c� x s T; 9 O Jy 3� 9 i �J z m= az C: I` I r�3 dl 9 __E .v]7 9 W I a O w ! O . C 3 . O m z �I U E- 12 p Iliii� I `• 7 c� yy s 4 9 O Jy 3� 9 i �J z m= C: I` I __E .v]7 W I a O w ! O . C 3 . O m z `• 7 yy o 4 9 O Jy W 9 i �J z m= I` I __E .v]7 O cn w ! O 3 m `• 7 O Jy W __E .v]7 O cn w ! O 3 m `• 7 9PrsG L'L�3 6� l 2 17 S 1 sit \ 1 1 �I1 "'mi, �n C. 1 (1) l 2 17 S 1 mj C2 W E. mj ME11HENT ! 3LBEH ASSOCIATESINC• 367 East Kellogg Blvd. - St. Paul, MN. 55101 - 612-228-9564 EGENED CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK AUG 7 1987 THIRD ADDITION J.G. Carlstrami z'14 Asscdatas, Inc. 1D0 North � ;th St. Su;'Le 925 CITY OF EAGAN Knneapo:-,, M! N 55403 PRELIMINARY REPORT ON STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM INTRODUCTION: It is proposed that a storm water detention pond be constructed within the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park, Third Addition. This pond is to be designed to contain the storm water run-off from this 5.75 acre development. At the present time, all storm water within the 5.75 acres drain into an existing pond within this proposed development. Also, storm water from the westerly one half of Scott Trail drains into a catch basin and into a drainage ditch which discharges into the pond area. EXISTING CONDITIONS: An 80 foot, 12 inch diameter storm pipe extends from the storm sewer main on Cliff Drive to the pond area. The inlet elevation of this 12 inch pipe is at 900.0. Storm water is discharged into the main on Cliff Drive and is eventually discharged into a pond area, designated AP -9, located on the west side of Nichols Road. The normal pond elevation of AP -9 is 892.3. The maximum pond elevation of AP -9 is 898.8. A street, Scott Trail, is located to the east. of this development. The centerline elevation at the catch basin, at its lowest elevation, is 902.4. Storm water from the east half of Scott Trail drains into the drainage ditch within the development. The west one half of Scott Trail drains into a catch basin which drains into a pond area designated as AP -50. The normal elevation of AP -50 is 886.0. The maximum pond elevation of AP -50 is 894.0. An interceptor storm sewer system is proposed to the AP -50 pond in the near future to control storm water run-off from this area. V ENGINEERS - LAND SURVEYORS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN: It is proposed that a new storage pond be constructed and a drainage system designed to accommodate storm water run-off in this development. The 5.75 acre parcel is to be platted into three lots and one outlot. The three lots are for commercial development and the outlot is for the storm water detention pond. The proposed detention pond, when empty; will contain'a 6 inch rainfall. However, the inlet of the 12 inch storm sewer pipe is at elevation 900.0 and has a -minimum grade of 0.07%. The capacity of this 12 inch pipe is approximately 1 cubic feet per second. In the event the pond is at elevation 900.0, the maximum storage is 2.0 feet (elevation 900 to 902) or 26,795 cubic feet. Therefore, a 1-1/4 inch rain will fill this pond to the maximum. DRAINAGE AND HYDROLOGY INFORMATION: Area: 5.75 Acres (Use 6 acres) (261,360 square foot surface area) Storage Pond Information: Bottom Elevation: 888.0 Maximum Elevation: 902.0 Storage Capacity: (Empty) 148,130 cubic feet Storage Capacity: Elevation 888 to 990 = 118,335 cubic feet Elevation 900 to 902= 26,795 cubic feet 12 inch diameter storm pipe inlet at elevation 900.0 (Cliff Drive). Scott Trail street elevation at catch basin inlet 902.0. SUMMARY: When the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park, Third Addition is completed, storm water run-off can be contained and controlled within the designated areas to a certain extent. However, due to existing conditions, the maximum effective elevation control is elevation 902.4. At that elevation, storm water will flow across Scott Trail, to the east, into Pond AP -50. When the interceptor storm sewer is extended to AP -50, a storm sewer should be installed along the lot lines of Lots 1 and 2 and the storm water diverted into Pond AP -50. 517 r w J J U) CC D m : MARI 1^11 NiN(LER w ■moo �f. !'DRIVER ENTEI 12 /JACKSON 12, ` 15'1 r : � RIDGE w .'; GST RELN I �y�y/ : ;i f" Wr H_� " . ir,N SIT(" RI r NiN(LER w ■moo �f. !'DRIVER ENTEI 12 /JACKSON 12, ` 15'1 r : � w -KU r 118 .'; GST RELN I �y�y/ : ;i f" Wr H_� " . ir,N SIT(" RI r w_s ,.. I. _, - •��y , _� V -r f J% _ r r18, w -KU r .'; 16 ; ��ffI{. 15 RI r w_s ,.. I. sem•. . DAKOTA COUNTY •f':z CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3RD SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. #2 city of eagan SANITARY SEWER standard PUBLIC approved: plate WORKS MASTER PLAN Cq DEPARTMENT �. mGm CHOOL P Ld —j AP-9.710ill 1 9 1, 925.6 AP -46 945.0O , 948.5.c ... ......... . city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME IAI SAP -I2;' A 912.1 SP -32!. 919.31 .9 9.376 .--AP-48 1.016 ! 1 9 ao. 6 P-15-1 923,51 SUBJECT PARCEL 00 DAKOTA COUNTY F A-yy N r'' CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL ARK 3RD STORM SEWER q1 - MASTER PLAN I FIG. -*1 approved: standard I plate :#: 880:6 88 ... .. . .. A P 890.. .. ............8941 IFF SAP -I2;' A 912.1 SP -32!. 919.31 .9 9.376 .--AP-48 1.016 ! 1 9 ao. 6 P-15-1 923,51 SUBJECT PARCEL 00 DAKOTA COUNTY F A-yy N r'' CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL ARK 3RD STORM SEWER q1 - MASTER PLAN I FIG. -*1 approved: standard I plate :#: 0.3/69.0 0 11 / HIGH m; SCHOOL 24 RtDGECLIfF'�\ ADD{TION 1� DAKOTA ! COUNTY PARK CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3RD city of eagan PUBLIC o , WORKS m DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. +3 approved standard plate 4;: rte, ;'> ,<"•,a, i r K4 pi`236 ... F • �. 7' Ipu 1l 1• LLJ 1 j l_ J Lo — -- \ RtDGECLIfF'�\ ADD{TION 1� DAKOTA ! COUNTY PARK CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK 3RD city of eagan PUBLIC o , WORKS m DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. +3 approved standard plate 4;: APC Minutes ;1 August 25, 1987 'i •r lrr CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARR 3RD ADDITION - PD AMENDMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall then called the next public hearing of the evening in regard to the application of Austin Companies for an amendment to the Planned Development Agreement, to allow a car care service center on a Limited Business designated parcel within the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park PUD, and a preliminary plat for the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition. A conditional use permit for pylon sign is also requested for this 1.83 acre one lot plat located on the north side of Cliff Road between Cliff Road and Scott Trail, a portion of Outlot A of Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 1st Addition. Mr. Runkle indicated that immediately to the north is the Building Block Addition (Day Care Center). He also indicated that the storm water issue must be resolved prior to final plat approval. Mr. Runkle then addressed the location,traffic circulation, size and lot coverage. The applicant was present to respond to questions. Mr. Victor Twaddell, 1849 Narvik Court, was present and indicated that while he was not here in regard to this project, he had to question whether such use could possibly be considered proper in an LB District. Mr. Vernon Colon was present and indicated that in his opinion, there was no notice of rezoning, although there was notice of a PD amendment. He felt that such a use should not be allowed in an LB designated area within a PD and that such use had previously been denied to Federal Land Company. McCrea moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of the rezoning as being inconsistent with the PUD, office use and the day care located. adjacent thereto. All voted in favor. Member McCrea then stepped down from the Commission, explaining that she had a financial interest in the next development, as realtor for the property. GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT -The last public hearing of the evening convened by Chairman Hall was on the applications of Cliff Road Partnership to rezone approximately 25 acres from A (Agricultural) to LB'•(Limited Business) and for a preliminary plat consisting of one lot on 4.4 acres proposed for up to a 50,000 square foot office building with 21 acres of outlots. Mr. Runkle introduced the proposal. Brad Swenson was present on behalf of the applicant, and described the RB parcel to the south and west of the proposal, along with the proposed fire hall. He indicated that a neighborhood meeting had been held and as a result, the developer would perform a tree survey and an EAW. He indicated that the developer was in agreement with the staff conditions, except for condition 11, indicating that the change in the access to Galaxie Avenue may cut off access to neighboring land, plus bisect an existing building site. 93 13 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA ADDITION I. Rezoning for Cliff Plaza Partnership and a Preliminary Plat for Galaxie Cliff Plaza Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their August 25, 1987 meeting to consider a rezoning from A to LB of approximately 25 acres and a preliminary plat consisting of one lot containing 4.4 acres of an office building and 21 acres of outlots entitled Galaxie Cliff Plaza. The APC is recommending denial of the applications. For additional information on this Engineering Departments reports, through �. item, refer to the Planning and copies are enclosed on pages If the project is to be approved by the City Council, the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting a cash donation according to the commercial parkland dedication requirement. For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to pages)/Q J/0 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the rezoning from A to LB and, 2) the preliminary plat entitled Galaxie Cliff Plaza. 9� SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA APPLICANT: CLIFF ROAD PARTNERSHIP LOCATION: PART OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 SECTION 32 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 22, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 17, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATIONS: The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately- twenty-five acres from A (agricultural) to LB (limited business) district. A second application submitted is a request for preliminary plat approval consisting of one lot containing 4.4 acres that would contain a 50,000 s.f. office building and twenty-one acres of outlots that would be developed in accordance with the concept and limited business uses allowed in the zoning ordinance. ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently the parcel is zoned A ------------------- (agricultural). The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this twenty-five acre parcel as an LB (limited business) use. The applicants are proposing to zone in accordance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. This parcel abuts 35E right-of-way to the west, Cliff Road to the north, residential property to the east, and in the southwest corner this parcel abuts an existing zoned parcel of RB (roadside business) and a two -acre parcel which the City just purchased for a future fire station location. COMMENTS: The property owner presently owns twenty-five acres of which he wishes to .zone at this time. However, the first phase of this development will only consist of approximately 4.4 acres and contain a 50,000 s.f. office building. The remainder, or twenty-one acres, has been looked at through a concept plan which provides road access through the entire parcel and sets up building pads and locations for the overall twenty-five acres. The applicant has indicated, however, that,he has no specific tenant or uses established at this time but would market the property in accordance with the LB (limited business) portion of the• zoning code for uses that would be allowed within this development. Access to this development will be from Galaxie Avenue. The proposal consists of one interior street where full access would be taken. This street would bisect the site and tie into the old alignment of Galaxie Avenue. The first phase of development would consist of one lot containing 4.4 acres located in the northeast corner of the parcel at the intersection of Cliff Road and Galaxie Avenue. Access to the site would be a right in/right out movement with full access being taken from the internal street which abuts the southerly lot line. y5 The proposed building is to be between 30,000 and 50,000 s.f. If 30,000 s.f. is requested, the applicant would have to provide 160 parking spaces, which are shown on the site plan. If the building is increased to 50,000 s.f., 266 parking spaces would be required. At the present time, 266 spaces have not been shown. In reviewing the lot coverage, the building is less than 10% in either case. The office building proposed is a permitted use within the limited business district. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary plans received to _date provide development concepts without detailed grading or lot information. The drainage plan for the proposed development should provide that all site drainage be conveyed to Pond AP -14. Pond AP -14 has been designated as a permanent ponding area in the City of Eagan Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Pond AP -14's outlet was constructed under the Galaxie Avenue project. If the wetland at the northeast corner of this plat remains, it should be drained by storm sewer to Pond AP -14. The proposed surface overflow from this area into the I -35E freeway right-of-way is subject to approval by MnDOT. No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as a part of this preliminary plat applicatiop. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: A street (Circulation Drive) is proposed through the plat connecting to Galaxie Avenue on the east and old Galaxie Avenue on the west. The proposed right-in/right-out into Lot 1, Block 1, from Galaxie Avenue is subject to review by the City traffic engineering consultant. The westerly end of Circulation Drive should be realigned to meet Galaxie Avenue at the intersection of Westwind Trail. The layout of the proposed fire station on the west side of old Galaxie Avenue near this location should be coordinated with this street layout to provide one good access point onto Galaxie Avenue for both the proposed fire station and the proposed Galaxie Cliff Plaza. Circulation Drive should be extended to the west end of the proposed site to provide an access to the existing vacant property east of I - 35E at old Galaxie Avenue. Old Galaxie Avenue could then be vacated when adequate access for this area is provided. Dakota County is requiring restricted access dedication along the entire border with Cliff Road. UTILITIES: Adequately sized sanitary sewer and water service to serve the proposed development are readily available from the existing facilities in Galaxie Avenue. An 8" sanitary sewer service stub has been provided to the north property line of Galaxie Avenue near Westwind Trail. The existing 8" sanitary sewer service stub provided is adequately sized to serve the entire development. Cutting a new sanitary sewer service into the main near the northeast corner of the proposed site is not recommended as it would require cutting into the existing heavily travelled Galaxie Avenue. Costs of extending the line on Circulation Drive to serve this area are estimated to be less than the cost of the special construction required to connect to the existing sanitary sewer in Galaxie Avenue. An 8" water main connection is provided to the property line of Galaxie Avenue at two locations to allow the water main to be looped through the proposed site without disturbing the surfacing of Galaxie Avenue. Water pressure in this addition for all but the -highest sites will be. - .greater than 80 psi. Pressure reducing valves will be required for the water systems in those buildings having a floor elevation lower than 865. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Easements in accordance with City of Eagan standards will be required for all storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water mains. It is proposed that Circulation Drive be provided with a 70' right-of-way because of its collector street status. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed Galaxie Cliff Plaza site has been assessed for the following public utilities at the single family rate: sanitary sewer trunk, water area, storm sewer trunk, street (Galaxie Avenue) and water lateral benefit. There are no assessments Bending against the proposed site and the following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval: PROD $ DESCRIPTION USEAGE RATE QTY AMT. 254 Water Area Upgrade C/I 316 Storm Sewer Upgrade C/I 316 Street Upgrade C/I $1,920/ac 4.4 ac $8,448 .026/sf 191,664 sf 46.93/ff 220 ff Trailway 12.40/ff 575 ff County Rd. 32 Upgrade C/I 92.67/ff 280 ff TOTAL PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ........ $56,834 4,983 10,325 7,130 25,948 The final assessment amount will be determined using rates in effect at the time of final plat approval and based on final plat dimensions and areas. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Additional study in the preparation of more detailed information on grading and drainage are required before additional consideration or approval can be given to the proposed Galaxie Cliff Plaza development. '?7 • CONDITIONS: GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA 1. That portion of the internal street should be constructed which abuts Lot 1. 2. Detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and an adequate landscape bond shall be required. 3. If the total development exceeds 300,000 s.f., an EAW should be done prior to the construction of the first office building. 4. The northerly access shall be limited to a right in/right out. 5. - All other standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 6. The proposed development shall be subject to compliance of all applicable standard conditions of final plat approval. 7. The development shall be responsible for providing a traffic impact analysis supporting the location of the northerly intersection of Circulation Drive with Galaxie Avenue. 8. The proposed right-in/right-out from Galaxie Avenue shall not be allowed. The right -in only will be considered based on the traffic impact analysis study. 9. The outlet for the low area in the southwest quadrant of the Galaxie Avenue/Cliff Road intersection shall be constructed to Pond AP -14. 10. The development is subject to the recommendations of the Dakota County Plat Commission. 11. The southerly intersection of Circulation Drive with Galaxie Avenue shall line up with Westwind Trail. 12. This development shall also comply with the most recent requirements of the standard conditions of approval as adopted by Council action. � t� STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Wav ,1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. r 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. (OVER) STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL PAGE TWO 5. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: Revised: r STANDARD lbo LTS;`2 A i� - /0 i D-111 , •f , . i I I P_ a, 1 f pC L B _ +� •SaFaFi -- � ,�� CLIFF ROAD CUFF GAa (CO. RD. 32) ---------------------- LJ- = --I; .�� :•• e�'`•--� `: e., •. %,•---;.�---.: .,, ;ill {. i11 �,,: vIl _- �� - •••+� 1 ; fX1Rif1NC,q`- -- - - ..��4- ---l�----P� ':PAFt}41VQ�� "� i��i,,'. WANK LD) id / %' /'r ;-:-•;; •,,, � 1�. � �,_-' lel41�a •••, . 1',; �i , ; ARIQw :111 r '��; ;; �;: = ; � = '=—� i �-• - ` .1 ```� INfiJLI•�!!!.•j` "i�' , r�/ i�� I 4 ',1, ( ...' : '� r i, i T i' 1, ! ' r . :�� `•. - r '.'� f ' • i l � ';%,. ',��'1l:P14RiaNG % � �;i ; j, I i �1 `.`•.• �,; ` ',�.��%: ,i',: i! I ' egp �• �f I� 3i P ii; ' � � 'irl i�, ��`1�„D*i;`: :��~`": •_=i~ _ :'q- /.\i � �yBU1LD1iVCa � ,-_.%,"1, 'iiiri� /� t___ ___ _ `,�,',:, � = fy' •t.l ,, . GALAxIE AVE le `P� I�'"'•�' \\ -ate ��i - •(� �\ LB -Limited Business COMPREHENSIVE SITE PLAN Jsmrm USES. GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA TRI -LAND l _Existing Comprehensive Plan-destgnatiofi LB - Limited Business SURVEYING CO.,INC. i- ',Proposed zoning LB- Limit6d Business "°'"•"•"'°"'°""""""° I CLIFF ROAD .. (CO. RD. 32)Aral . � J .N /f LOT I ry'y � - BLOCK I W -�:• unor z� ��_-- I % "'PRELIMINARY PLAT & UTILITY PLAN GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA Ti-RLAND : SURVEYING CQ,INC. 4'2..,� ._•,• . - .. ' .. .. - ..Ca•:iir'�:�C-o lei,�li`:; a. fu:. �..w3tiCi?it _.i��i :4. .. �.. ..a•l;r... /a 3 - `cR sT '9 TF W N a Lor , , aLJCY 1 °:;;;•�: .� T TRI—LAND INC. - ? P -0 dp GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA P f L... .11n. 51.1. e• +inw••are •• ro _ 1� PLANNERS ENGINEERS r PRELIMINARYCa 0 0 = GRADINpLA�1 %�., ✓� ', �^ =-- � SURVEYORS 0r....n y1 ,7.., v R.3 Ne 17235 0.1. �i3 �3�J �e59 M1COl3 ROAD EAGGAN. u aYE 30n 7.123 (6121 A25-7830 j a .1 F", 'A«: " 81.1792. -is 1,61 He—, (Rcry 87,1-k!6 153 46.0/72.0 145 463/76-0- 7 4, A, rrr 16� ..1 157 Tj i 152 39.0/65.0 I, J16" 4 —1-2 2.5(50 vrqVLR 2 7 kt 2.9 16" 9qD F:i� .0 7 .0 rl 22 2.5/firs.0 87 970 f 30.8 0 41 RIDGECLIF D, 20" — 219 /55. 227 1 161 0. Gja 32 75.1h. 7 ADDITION 223 85.8/91 4i 'I % -- A - - (2 w-1 8 52 DAKOTA COUNTY PARK 6t.6 -- 4 M.G GROUNO STORAGE �4 H.W.L. 1150 0_ 2 GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA ........ ... SUBJECT PARCEL .......... ................. .................. I FIG. +3 -city of eagan approved -_ standard PUBLIC WATER plate WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT ,X h..11N ikj/A 9i.I'i�'•P �-- I4 9 81.7 89.00886. 54r' 894.0 A }I 43 tF2L9A-vv,RC Cj P-18 925.5 `/ ,•' 93 1.3 AP- 17 9.S 926.0 1 I , 'a/A_99 990...5. /i 7�. 111 g90.gi 94 ; v I.i... 8499;4.'9i1' 4 X910.0 I x��•I J.g {.. g� 1 �. ;�BPr9. r pp...P_ 12 /`^ 11� :911:3' J' _itl'I�Il:f�-ft`12nd ]/ rifi`'11JJi+ :: ;i'• n;•�893.3/ Ij ti-`r?t*.�� 21 BP -6 AP-:22`'Ii, AP�i4�,'9040 ;,..,Ifs.. N 882.0 li 8736 (_ `-8960! �SP-10' f r 910.0 _ L. `/j9 882.0 _ �5' (�'tI •') il:' 1 •, t.l.,... L.S.-3 20 -2 916.0 AP 3u,ITt 889.3 !t i ,-,,.J ti r , � �::.r a ;�;'� BP. 900.0 ,h �1' 'NI J i\1 r1 •li• 921 AP -II' �912.'1P _ �? .915.0 .8�"h.' 1 8892-/ . �) v LL',tiV1 y'L ' ' , 916.0 `SAP 2_ _ .^ f' BP- ?2' 1 5.0 �- �' T 5� it ,926Ai _ 40 Add•. -- -- --- �•"�". ..�:..92T-.4-,� i:..c'`.:..:_......- `• .:, BP -31 B -F+ ` 9 3 5-0 -14 - I f.:;i. !9.37',6�'' JJ •I • . / 912.1 f �. -32f:. 1, '\_�•�,. I �' % �• /9.3 933.9. ff f i -ee�J, �Z. ��'I�a 1 fl.�ffp :�) iicltjC, •4� 121 ; i f fir• "r�, / . ]I . , n,`. 4! if . i. ',✓ il;�':;rr',1,.'r. \,'C iii:''' I 'Co 14; 6 .-�L.sP,15 P 934.0')908:8 ! 913.0 ( 1 i [QI"G l= �� rri�i;Ec r� I'�'ilri��•,;_� '!I ,11. •� I LP -59 DAKOTA COUNTY PARK 893.3 A -YY t 900.0 GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. -*1 City of eagan approved : standard PC- . PUBLIC STORM WER plate #:WORKS a DEPARTMENT MAST PLAN GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA city of eagan PUBLIC CD WORKS co DEPARTME CLIFF ROAD (CO RD 3:1 000000060 COUNTY ROAD 32 UPGRADE 130 FF. w-� IRALWAYS 575M 167 approved: Standard plate #: APC Minutes August 25, 1987 CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARR 3RD ADDITION - PD AMENDMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall then called the next public hearing of the evening in regard to the application of Austin Companies for an amendment to the Planned Development Agreement, to allow a car care service center on a Limited Business designated parcel within the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park PUD, and a preliminary plat for the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 3rd Addition. A conditional use permit for pylon sign is also requested for this 1.83 acre one lot plat located on the north side of Cliff Road between Cliff Road and Scott Trail, a portion of Outlot A of Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 1st Addition. Mr. Runkle indicated that immediately to the north is the Building Block Addition (Day Care Center). He also indicated that the storm water issue must be resolved prior to final plat approval. Mr. Runkle then addressed the location, traffic circulation, size and lot coverage. The applicant was present to respond to questions. Mr. Victor Twaddell, 1849 Narvik Court, was present and indicated that while he was not here in regard to this project, he had to question whether such use could possibly be considered proper in an LB District. Mr. Vernon Colon was present and indicated that in his opinion, there was no notice of rezoning, although there was notice of a PD amendment. He felt that such a use should not be allowed in an LB designated area within a PD and that such use had previously been denied to Federal Land Company. McCrea moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of the rezoning as being inconsistent with the PUD, office use and the day care located adjacent thereto. All voted in favor. Member McCrea then stepped down from the Commission, explaining that she had a financial interest in the next development, as realtor for the property. GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The last public hearing of the evening convened by Chairman Hall was on the applications of Cliff Road Partnership to rezone approximately 25 acres from A (Agricultural) to LB (Limited Business) and for a preliminary plat consisting of one lot on 4.4 acres proposed for up to a 50,000 square foot office building with 21 acres of outlots. Mr. Runkle introduced the proposal. Brad Swenson was present on behalf of the applicant, and described the RB parcel to the south and west of the proposal, along with the proposed fire hall. He indicated that a neighborhood meeting had been held and as a result, the developer would perform a tree survey and an EAW. He indicated that the developer was in agreement with the staff conditions, except for condition 11, indicating that the change in the access to Galaxie Avenue may cut off access to neighboring land, plus bisect an existing building site. 13 APC Minutes August 25, 1987 Mr. Bill Sowles, owner of the parcel, appeared and indicated that the property had been purchased 20 years ago for investment through industrial development, and that construction of I -35E has caused the relocation of Galaxie Avenue, bisecting the original 80 acres of which the area to the east and south had been developed as a single family area. Mr. Bill Winchester, 1830 Karis Way, indicated that in his opinion, the plans were too vague and that the City should avoid a I-494 strip situation such as in Bloomington. He also suggested that more upper level homes should be constructed in this wooded, rolling, ponded area. Mr. Jeff Carlson, 4730 Ridge Wind Trail, indicated that his investigation showed that the owner, contrary to its presentation, does not pay taxes at a commercial rate. Mr. Ray Williams of Astleford Company indicated opposition to the City's proposed realignment of the street. Mr. Vic Twaddell appeared and indicated that LB was much too broad a use for this area and requested a delay in the zoning. Mr. Jim Kohl, 4732 Ridge Wind Trail, indicated the proposed development didn't fit in the existing area. Mr. Gene Brock of Narvik Court, pointed out that it was his understanding that the tree survey would only involve the 4.4 acre lot. Mr. Swenson advised that the EAW and a tree survey would be completed on the entire development. Mr. Brock then questioned whether traffic could be kept out of the residential area and who would pay for injuries to the children. Member Harrison expressed concern regarding the dual access onto Galaxie Avenue from the proposed lots, as did member Wilkins. Member Trygg questioned rezoning the entire 25 acres when plans were available, only for the 4.4 acre parcel. Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the rezoning on the basis that the plat was not properly completed, there was no schedule for construction, there were access problems and there were no plans for the remainder of the development. All voted yea. ADJOURNMENT Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 1:25 a.m. All voted affirmatively. DGK Secretary - APC /47 14 Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 FOUNDATION PERMIT REQUEST, R & B ADDITION, LOT 1, BLOCK 1 J. Foundation Permit Request, R & B Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 -- Enclosed on page is a letter received from the developers of the proposed R & Addition requesting Council authorization to issue a foundation permit prior to final plat approval. It is anticipated that the final plat application will be in order for Council consideration at the October 6 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the issuance of a foundation permit for Lot 1, Block 1, R & B Addition. HAVRE-105 1AEATS- EAIFOOD ® ��68 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD, EAGAh, MINNESOTA 55122 (612) 452-8660 September 9, 1937 City Council City of Eagan REE: R & B Addition Honorable Council ;embers, The required drai,:ings and materials were submitted to the city for final approval at the end of July 1937• :!e understand that several large development projects in the city have taken more time than anyone could estimate. We are not asking for any favors or to rush these projects through, because vie live in Lagan and want it to be a ilrell developed city just as you do. ?1e do ho,,kever under- stand that permission can be granted to put in the build- ing foundation. The grading should be completed -jrithin a feet days, so in order to keep the project rolling ire are asking for this permission: Thank You i 0 Jerry -Braun LeRoy Rother glb cc: Tom Colbert Agenda Information September 15, 1987 REFUNDING REQUEST/LEMAY LAKE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING K. Refunding Request for the LeMay Lake Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds --The City Administrator was contacted by Marsha Cohodes, representing Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., requesting on behalf of the LeMay Lake Partnership, that the City of Eagan consider the refunding of $12,500,000 of multifamily housing revenue bonds for the LeMay Lake project. It is the opinion of the partner- ship that the interest savings resulting in a refunding of the outstanding bonds will justify a payment of the premium to all bond holders. According to the bond documents, the partnership may prepay the bonds, prior to the 1992 maturity, beginning April 1, 1988. On that date, the current holders of the bonds will be paid the face amount of their bond plus a 2% premium. The City Administrator requested an explanation of the request from Miller & Schro der Financial, Inc., and a copy is enclosed on pages A -through. Also enclosed is a resolution that would give preliminary approval to the issuance of refunding bonds and a copy of that resolution is enclosed on pages 1/6 through //& . A representative of Miller & Schroeder and from the partnership will be present to answer questions. If the City Council would like additional information, please contact this office or the item could be continued allowing the Finance Committee to meet and further discuss the merits of the refunding issue. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a resolution that allows for the refunding of the multifamily housing revenue bonds that were originally issued for the LeMay Lake Partnership by the issuance of the multifamily housing and revenue refunding bonds. Toll Free Minnesota (800) 862-6002 Toll Free Other States (800) 328-6122 3 \» � e e e Northwestern Financial Center ■ 7900 Xerxes Avenue South ■ P.O. Box 789 ■ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 (612) 83 1- 15 00 September 8, 1987 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: $12,500,000 City of Eagan, Minnesota Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (LeMay Lake Project) Series 1985 Dear Mr. Hedges: The LeMay Lake Partnership (the "Partnership") is approaching the City of Eagan (the "City") seeking approval of their request to refund the above referenced bonds (the "Bonds"). Pursuant to the Bond documents, the Partnership may pre -pay the Bonds, prior to their 1992 maturity, beginning April 1, 1988. On this date, the current holders of the Bonds will be paid the face amount of their bond plus a 2% (two percent) premium. It is the opinion of the Partnership that the interest savings resulting in the refunding of the outstanding bonds justifies the payment of the premium to bondholders. The Bonds are currently rated "AAA" by Standard & Poor's due to insurance provided by Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company (the "Insurance") and their 50% ownership in LeMay Lake Apartments (the "Project"). After the refunding, a proposed schedule of which is attached, the bonds will continue to be rated "AAA" by Standard & Poor's and the Insurance will remain in place. //3 Headquarters: Minneapolis, Minnesota Branch Offices: Solana Beach, California • San Francisco, California • St. Paul, Minnesota • Milwaukee, Wisconsin • Columbus, Ohio • Honolulu, Hawaii Wmhe al,he S—raw., In, e tm Pro,c.,inn Cugn,mtwn Thomas Hedges September 8, 1987 Page 2 In response to requests of the residents occupying the Project, the Bond refunding will enable the Partnership to pay for capital improvements. Water softeners and improved hallway ventilation systems will be installed. Upsized trees, landscaping and lighting have been installed along Eagandale Boulevard as well. Additional trees and plants will be added to the to the entire site and outdoor picnic/barbeque facilities will be installed. The Partnership feels that these capital improvements will add to the enjoyment of residents and will enhance the rentability and appearance of the Project. Leonard, Street & Deinard (the "Bond Counsel") has determined that the legal action required by the City is the passage of a final resolution by the City Council prior to Bond closing, currently estimated to be on January 6, 1988. The City Attorney will receive copies of all documentation, for review on behalf of the City prior to closing. The Mayor, City Clerk and City Manager will be required to sign documents, at the convenience of the respective parties, prior to closing. At the September 15, 1987, City Council meeting, the Partnership is requesting that the City indicate their agreement to proceed with,the refunding of the outstanding Bonds by adopting the attached preliminary resolution. Bond Counsel does not require a public hearing for the refunding, nor is there a legal requirement that a preliminary resolution be passed. As always, we look forward to working with the City of Eagan and would be happy to answer any questions you may have. Very truly yours, MILLER & SCHROED/ER FINANCIAL, INC. Marcia A. Cohodes Vice President MAC/tjw Enclosure cc: Tom Maple V-" lN� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS TO REFUND MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS ORIGINALLY ISSUED UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AUTHORIZING THE INCURRENCE OF COSTS AND EXPENSES WITH REGARD TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the City of Eagan (the "City"), adopted April 2, 1985, and pursuant to the Indenture of Trust, dated as of April 1, 1985, between the City and First Trust Company of St. Paul, in St. Paul, Minnesota as Trustee, the City issued its Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Le May Lake Apartments Project), in the aggregate prinicipal amount of $12,500,000 (the "Prior Bonds"); and WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Prior Bonds were loaned by the City to Le May Lake Apartments, a Minnesota general partnership (the "Company"), to acquire, renovate and construct a 282 -unit multifamily rental housing development (the "Project"), located south and west of the intersection of Eagandale Boulevard and Loan Oak Road in the City and owned and operated by the Company; and WHEREAS, the City has been advised by the Company that on the basis of information available to the Company, it appears economically feasible for the Prior Bonds to be refunded in their entirety by the issuance by the City of its Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Le May Lake Apartments Project) in the aggregate principal amount of $12,500,000 (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, neither the City nor the State of Minnesota shall be liable on the Bonds and the Bonds shall not be a debt of the City within the meaning of any state constitutional provision or statutory limitation, and will not constitute or give rise to a charge against the general credit or taxing power of the City or a pecuniary liability of the City, nor shall the Bonds be payable out of any funds or properties other than those provided as security therefor; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Minnesota: Section 1. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to -2 - the issuance of the Bonds in an aggregate prinicipal amount of up to $12,500,000 to refund all of the Prior Bonds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a legal obligation on the part of the City or its City Council to issue or cause the issuance of the Bonds. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds, should the City, at any time prior to issuance thereof, determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. Section 2. The staff of the City is hereby directed to take those actions necessary for review of the proposal to issue the Bonds. The staff of the City is hereby authorized and directed to provide the Company, the underwriter or the trustee with any preliminary information needed for this purpose. Section 3. The Company has agreed, and it is hereby determined, that any and all direct and indirect costs incurred by the City in connection with the issuance of the Bonds and the continued operation of the Project, whether or not the City by resolution authorizes the issuance of the Bonds, will be paid by the Company upon request. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of September, 1987. Mayor ATTEST: Secretary to the Council Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 EAW REVIEWfCLIFF LAKE GALLERIA & TOWERS PROJECT L. EAW Review for Cliff Lake Galleria and Towers Project --An application to consider a retail shopping center is currently under consideration by the Advisory Planning Commission for the Cliff Lake Galleria and Towers project. This application was first considered by the APC at the August 25 meeting and continued until the September 22 meeting. Therefore, the merits of the project regarding the commercial shopping center will be again considered at an APC public hearing before any consideration is to be given by the City Council. A resident, Michelle Swanson, who resides at 1977 Badger Court, has sent a letter and petition to the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board requesting an EAW for the Cliff Lake Galleria and Towers project. The MEQB, in receipt of the petition, has sent a letter to the City outlining a number of points and procedures which include "if preparation of an EAW is neither mandatory nor exempted, the City of Eagan has the option to prepare an EAW. The City has 30 working days in which to respond to the EQB as to whether an EAW will be required which is cause for this item to be placed on the September 15, City Council agenda. The City staff researched the EAW that was performed in 1982 and their conclusions were outlined in the staff report to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission also requested a legal opinion regarding the project and, more specifically, whether the 1982 EAW conforms with the project presented in 1987. The City Administrator was contacted by a representative of Hoffman Development Company and apparently, the development team is planning to proceed with an EAW to satisfy questions that have been raised by the City staff and update the initial EAW that was performed in 1982. There has been some question as to whether an EAW is required for the Cliff Lake Galleria and Towers Project and for additional information refer to the memo from the City Attorney's office that will be enclosed with the Addditional Information packet on Monday. For additional information refer to the petition submitted by approximately thirty-one (31) property owners requesting an EAW and, second, the response from the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, which outlines the rules and procedures for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet, enclosed on pages l 1L. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To determine whether an EAW is required for the!Cliff Lake Galleria and Towers Project that is presently under consideration by the Advisory Planning Commission. 117 Minnesota Environmental Quality Board 100 Capitol Square Building 550 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Phone August 21, 1987 Dale Runkle City Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Petition for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for Cliff Lake Galleria and Towers Dear Mr. Runkle: The Environmental Quality Board (EQB) has received a petition requesting that an EAW be prepared on the project described in the petition, and has determined that City of Eagan is the appropriate governmental unit to decide the need for an EAW. The requirements for environmental review, including the preparation of EAWs, can be found in the Minnesota Rules parts 4410.0200 - .7800. Please contact me if you do not have access to these rules. The procedures to be followed in making the EAW decision are set forth in part 4410.1100, (page 13 of the rules). Key points in the procedures include: 1. No final.government approvals may be given to the project named in the petition until the need for an EAW has been determined. If the decision is to prepare an EAW, approval must be withheld until either a Negative Declaration is issued or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is completed (see part 4410.3100, subp. 1, page 25). 2. A first step in making the decision regarding the need for an -EAW would be to compare the project to the mandatory EAW, EIS and Exemption categories listed in parts 4410.4300, 4410.4400, and 4410.4600, respectively (starting on page 32). If the project should fall under any of these categories, environmental review is automatically required or prohibited. If this should be the case, proceed accordingly. 3. If preparation of an EAW is neither mandatory nor exempted, City of Eagan has the option to prepare an EAW. The standard to be used to decide if an EAW should be done is given in part 4410.1100, subp. 6. Note that this requires that a record of decision including specific findings of fact be maintained. //9 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER &5 Mr. Runkle August 21, 1987 Page Two 4. You are allowed 15 working days (Saturdays, Sundays and holidays do not count) for your decision unless it must be made by a board or other body which meets only periodically, in which case you have 30 working days. You may request an extra 15 days from EQB if the decision is not made by a board. 5. You must notify, in writing, the proposer, the petitioners' representative and the EQB of your decision within five (5) working days (again, Saturday, Sunday and holidays do not count). I would appreciate your sending a copy of your record of decision on the petition along with notification of your decision for our records. This is not required, however. Notice of the petition and its assignment to your unit of government will be published in the EOB Monitor on September 7, 1987. If you have any questions or need any assistance, please do not hesitate to call my staff. The phone number is (612) 296-8253 or you may call on our toll-free line by dialing 1-800-652-9747 and asking for the Environmental Quality Board, Environmental Review Program. Sincerely, Gregg M. Downing Environmental Review Coordinator cc: Michele Swanson, petition representative Ryan Construction Co. Hoffman Development Group //9 Subpart 2A. We, the undersigned, request that a new Environmental Assessment Worksheet be done for, The land on the north side of Cliff Road, East side of Rahn Road, South of the Northern States Power lines and West side of Blackhawk Road and Interstate 35E, which is being developed to included a proposed Target, Super Valu, tenant shops and other commercial buildings. Subpart 2B. The development is a joint venture of: Ryan Contruction Co. 900 2nd Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55401 Hoffman Development Group 2214 E117th Street Burnsville, MN 55437 Subpart 2C. I, Michele Swanson, represent the petitioners. 1977 Badger Court Eagan, MN 55122 452-6236 Subpart 2D and 2E. This project, as originally constituted in 1982, required a MANDATORY EAW because of its potential for significant environmental effects. The present project now being proposed is two to three times larger than the "project" reviewd in the 1982 EAW. The present project differs significantly and materially in the following respects: 1982 EAW 1. 200,000-300,000 square feet 2. 1800 parking stalls 3. 25.85 acres of impervious surfaces 4. Traffic count of 20,000 ADT 5. Wooded areas would be preserved and con- strution would be avoided around Cliff Lake 1987 Proposal 745,000 square feet In excess of 4,000 parking stalls, based on the required parking for 745,000 square feet of commercial/hotel/ office development While the total area is unknown, it far exceeds the area shown in 1982 Traffic count will double or triple for 745,000 square feet. Therefore an increase of traffic noise, air pollution and odors. Will eliminate virtually all trees and building would be in close proximity to Cliff Lake /;D 6. Natural area6to be preserved to accomodate surface runoff 7. Residential across street from school park, with one access point to Rahn Road from the shopping center 8. Important site characteristics such as trees, valleys, marshlands to be preserved 9. Rahn Road adequate to carry traffic n All natural areas would virtually eliminated (Army Corps permit will be needed) High intensity commercial use across street from school and park with three access points on Rahn Road From the shopping center Virtually all of these site characteristics would be changed and eliminated Rahn Road must be widened /9-2-7 c 6�1 �"G/- 175, 71 7-7 fad , 714"4 L 0a'V-e 17 ...� �`�`�Y 3 ,` «l� : i"�1, /,�. iA yjj � �r%c,-� �w -. ' Gari' E:.E.t�� J ��__. _�,�-�_� �.� ��'�Y'J • �` """` ' 1771 PAGE 2 o2l 9 9:5- otl�t. I :�O� 7sunr'l-z'« tea,t \0 30. H, Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 -:ADDITIONAL_ ITEMS' PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS A. Public Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Contract 87-32, Receive Bid/Award Contract (Braun Court, Chapel Hill, Country Club Market in Patrick Addition) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, September 11, formal bids were received for the installation of utilities and/or streets for the above referenced subdivisions. Enclosed on page *-is a tabulation of the bids received showing a relationship of the low bid to the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing for each related project. After a review and verification of the bids submitted by staff, a recommendation will be provided by the Public Works Director at the meeting on September 15 along with the status regarding the appropriate easements or Rights -of -Entry agreements necessary to proceed with the installation of these improvments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 87-32 (Braun Court et al) and award the contract to the low bidder. The bid tab for Contract 87-32 was not available for the packet on Friday and will be included 'in the Additional Information packet on Monday. Agenda Information Memo September 15, 1987 Item 2. Contract 87-38, Receive Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Dallas Development 2nd Addition/Kennebec Drive - Streets and Utilities) --On July 21, the Council approved the installation of streets and utilities for the above referenced project and authorized the preparation of detail plans and specifications which have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for review and authorization to advertise for bids. The Public Works Director and consultant engineer will update the Council regarding the design concerns of the storm sewer outflow into the Minnesota River. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 87-38 (Dallas Development 2nd Addition/Kennebec Drive - Streets and Utilities) and authorize advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, October 16, 1987. CONTRACT 87-20, APPROVE LEASE EASEMENT AGREEMENT Item 3. Contract 87-20, Approve Lease/Easement Agreement (E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer) --Previously, the Council authorized the payment of the required fee to the Soo Line Railroad Company for an easement to install the storm sewer within their right-of-way. Subsequently, a formal lease agreement has been prepared which requires execution by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the lease agreement for the Soo Line Railroad under Contract 87-20 (E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1987 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE CORRESPONDENCE/CLIFF LAKE GALLERIA & TOWERS PROJECT Enclosed are two (2) letters addressed to Mayor Blomquist and the City Council from residents expressing their opinions on the proposed Cliff Lake Galleria nd Towers project. These letters are attached on pages 3 and $ . IDS 191/NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Enclosed on pages( through 17i is a copy of a Media Release on Review and Comment Statement performed by the Minnesota Department of Education regarding the proposed construction of a new 26 -classroom elementary school to be located in the City of Savage. This information is provided to the City Council as 1) informational and, 2) to provide any input regarding the proposed project and how it relates to the present closure of Cedar Elementary School. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW Enclosed on pages _L3 __ through Z/ _ is a copy of a letter received from the Metropolitan Council regarding the review status of our Comprehensive Guide Plan Update. The Planning Department, with the assistance of John Voss, are addressing the issues and concerns as identified in the attachment. PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT/AUGUST Enclosed on naQes Z?i throuch Z6 is the Protective Inspections Monthly Report for the month of August. Please note the reduction in total single-family homes from 663 to 472 in comparison with August, 1986. The total permits is running slightly under 1986. As stated at the last City Council meeting, it is the opinion of our staff that the reduction in single-family housing permits is directly related to the shortage of lot inventory and with the increasing number of -final plat approvals is anticipated that single-family building permits will be extremely high for the remainder of the year. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE/STATUS OF RECENT LEVY LIMIT APPEAL Enclosed on pages through Zg is a copy of the Department of Revenue's response to the City of Eagan's appeal for a payable 1988 levy limit base adjustment. The department is willing to allow a levy limit base adjustment for the use of reserve funds in the amount of $98,000 which reduced the 1987 property tax levies. The other arguments presented by the City were loss of Federal Revenue Sharing, the Comparable Worth mandate and increased expenditures to maintain basic services were denied. The League of Minnesota Cities is asking that all communities who submitted an appeal to- the Department of Revenue and were denied the right to adjust their levy limit base further appeal that decision. The City Council should take a moment and discuss whether there is any interest to pursue a further appeal. VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT MAY 1987 Enclosed on paget e is a copy of the Volunteer Fire Department Monthly Report for month of May. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM The City of Eagan has been approached by Dakota County to participate in a Geographic Information System for county and city use. This project was briefly explained to the City Council at the Budget Workshop Session and appeared to receive support last Thursday evening. The City's participation which is estimated at a range of fifteen to twenty-two thousand dollars depending on participation by Dakota Electric, would be budgeted as an expenditure from cable franchises. The first utility to be placed on the map for informational purposes could be the location of cable condj it throughout the community . E'.^.cicsed on pages 0 throug:: - . is a memo from Administrative Assistant Hohenstein with the appropriate attachments further defining the Geographic Information System and its practical implementation for the City of Eagan. Staff will further discuss the funding issue with the Cable Commission and the City of Burnsville. CORRESPONDENCE/LAWSUITS Enclosed without page number are copies of memos from the City Attorney's Office regarding the O'Neill vs City of Eagan and Tom Thumb vs City of Eagan. CITY OF SAVAGE OPEN HOUSE An invitation was received for the Mayor and City Councilmembers from the City of Savage announcing their Open House. This open house celebrates the completion of their new City Hall at 6000 McColl Drive and Water Treatment Plant on County Road 27. The celebration begins at 4:00 and continues to 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 24, 1987. CITY CONTRACT 87-16, NORTH NICOLS ROAD CLOSURE Enclosed on page ' is a letter sent to all property owners between Diffley Road and Beau D'Rue Drive informing them of the impending closure of Nicols Road to facilitate the reconstruction of this roadway to insure completion prior to snowfall. Any questions should be directed to the Engineering Department for proper review and response. -Isl Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator Y Council Members Eagan City Council 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 Dear Council Members: As residents of Eagan and homeowners who live on Rahn Road, we are very much opposed to the Cliff Lake Galleria and Towers project. We consider this project to be too large for the existing neighborhood in which it is intended to be placed. Rahn Road is not a high density area, it is residential, and to put a shopping center as large as the one proposed by the Hoffman, Ryan developers, in this area would be detrimental to the surrounding community. At present Rahn Road has more traffic than one cares for on a residential street. Putting in a major shopping center on Rahn and Cliff would increase the traffic and thereby endanger the children and pedestrians of the area. Another concern is the close proximity to Rahn school. Why put a large shopping center so close to an elementary school? Certainly it would increase the potential of child abductions, shoplifting, and truancy. We are not opposed to a Target in the Eagan area, in fact we would welcome it, but it must be placed in an area that is better suited for such high density traffic as this project will generate. Sincerely, Jim and Cheryl Bodin 4052 Rahn Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 Dear Mayor Bl omhu i st and Council a i"lerrither"s Smith, Wachter, Egan, and Ellison: - am a concerned resident of the proposed Cliff Rahn site. From 11 that 1 have read and heard, there seems to to a bias on the part of our Mayor. She is p!J'L1.1Ic1y opposed to a site on piffles becau_e of the impact on the residents that are in close prox:imiti. hill,,! far away are these residents? Then she turn=. .around and publicly praises her'se i f for bringing "Target" to this community. The Cliff Rahn site wi 1 i have a greater impact on resident=_ that wi l l live in a closer proximity to the proposed site. To quote from the denial of the Diffley site, with a few wird change= that 1 will mark with underlines, 1 will state why this site should also be denied. 1. The Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan (land use portion in place since 1974) pro'v'ides for = mixture of R-111 , i _Q LB and RB. The Guide plan was changed in 1980 to a mixture omoi' R -I11, 1'19 _I.i!d LB for, the subject property, and it is not appropr i •ate, based JCion a i i information =.rid testimony submitted, to revise the Comprehensive Guide to increase the intensity for commercial uses. Although revisions to the Comprehensi h;e Guide may be desirable and r'equir'ed occasionally for specific parcels, reliance on the Comprehensive Guide is impor'ta.nt for iiovermental agencies, , ev d- eloper=•, residents and prooer'ty owners. Any deviations or revisions must be well substantiated. 2. Development of traffic corridors, infrastructure, and i_i,un tx/C i tx services have been planned .ontemp1atinu R-111 , !'•10', LE for this site. The large _.rale proposed commercial use would r'equir'e upgrading of such improvements and services, for example: entrance, exit and left turn lanes onto: and off of 1- 5E. Disbursement of traffic into residential areas along Rahn Road and Bl ackha11:k Road would be increased substantially. �~- _ . Property owner's and residents in general have expressed orally and in writing, objections to the development for r'eason's including traffic and s-a.f tey. 4. Resident's and property owners have purchased surrounding properties based on the intended u'_e of this _•i to . It would be detrimental to the surrounding residents and property owners if this use were changed. 5. The Comprehensive Guide Plan adopted in 1 5 and reaffirmed in 19801 with supporting statistics, indicate there is relatively higher percentage of 1._.nd designated for commercial uses in Eagan at present, both in relation to potential development and to surrounding suburban communities, causing at least one commercial lanhdowner,'developer• to down-zoneto .esidental in order to market the undeveloped land. 6. The i-: ompr•ehens i ve Guide Plan provides for residential uses surrounding the parcel with one small commercial site to the south. There are strong concerns by APC member_- and others whether the existing and proposed population can justify additional commercial property zoning. 7. It would be unfair to the Surrounding property owners and developers in the City to revise the Comprehensive Guide Plan, after having been adopted and approved by the City Council for a. number of years, noting many property owners have relied upon the original Comprehensive Guide Plan. 8. There clearly would be sustantia.l increase in traffic resulting from the conversion of the use of the object parcel from land use - density of a. mixture of :-III, NB, LB, causing an adverse impact upon the health, :;elfar'e artd saftey of the residents of the City; and in addition, it would create a significant impact upon surrounding residents, including an increase in traffic on the local residential streets. 9. In the event the City Council did approve the revision in the land use and the zoning, the council then would have no valid reason to deny comparable applications for revision to commercial use and zoning in other areas in the City, which could result in up to 400 acres of additonal land being converted to commercial use. None of these even addresses the issue of the elementary school being across the street. I urge you to use the Same good judgement and common sense to vote down this proposal. Michele Swanson 1977 Cadger Court Eagan, MN 55122 452-6216 1 9/3/87 9:46 AM Media Release on Review and Comment - Independent School District 191 Burnsville -Eagan -Savage 100 River Ridge Court Burnsville, MN 55337 Contact: David Siegel Public Information Coordinator 887-7212 MediaRelease.................................................................................................................9/3/87 Commissioner of education recommends new elementary school in District 191 The School Board of the Burnsville -Eagan -Savage School District heard ex- citing news Thursday evening with the receipt of Comments from the Com- missioner of Education regarding the construction of a new elementary school. All major school construction in the state must be subjected to an ob- jective analysis by the Commissioner before a School board can hold a school bond election. In her letter to the District, Commissioner of Education Ruth Randall said, "Based on the department's analysis...the Commissioner of Ed- ucation judges the proposed construction to be educationally and economically feasible." The District proposed to construct a 26 -classroom elementary school on property currently owned by the School District. The site is located on Glen- dale Road in the City of Savage and is adjacent to the Scott/Dakota County line. This site is strategically placed in the area of the District that is experi- N 2 9/3/87 9:46 AM Media Release on Review and Comment - encing the greatest residential growth. In 1981-82, 34 percent of the elemen- tary population lived west of I -35W and was served by three schools. In 1991- 92, 50 percent of the elementary age population will reside west of 35-W and, with the new building, will be served by four schools. In addition to the regional population shift, the District's elementary en- rollment is expected to increase by over 1,100 students, an increase of 23 per- cent, between 1986-87 and 1991-92. The new building will accommodate 725 students in kindergarten through grade six and will be near capacity when it opens in 1989. A positive response from the Commissioner was expected be- cause the population growth and demographics are so dynamic. However, Superintendent Sally Bell said that, "It is no less reassuring and gratifying to have our building plans and population projections affirmed by an indepen- dent and knowledgeable source." The Commissioner's Review and Comment will be published in its entirety prior to the October 6th election. The cost for the new school is estimated to be $6,986,000 including construction, furnishings and equipment. The cost to the property owner is 1.5 mills — $33 per year on a home with an assessor's market value of $100,000. Debt on existing buildings is nearly retired, there- fore district residents can expect property taxes for debt purposes to steadily decline from nine mills in 1988 to just over two mills in 1992. According ,to District 191 Business Manager, Carter Christie, "The District is fortunate to be an a very unique situation whereby a significant educational project can be undertaken with a negligible impact on property taxes. The need is obvious, the benefits are great but the cost is low. We are in a most enviable position." 3 9/3/87 Media Release on Review and Comment - 9:46 AM The new school would continue District 191's high standards for education- al effectiveness coupled with operating efficiency. The board election will be held on October 6, 1987. Polls will be open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Attachments: Elementary Enrollment Projections Commissioners Review and Comment ON Capitol Square 550 Cedar Street August 24, 1987 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Dr. Sally Bell, Superintendent Independent School District 191 100 River Ridge Court Burnsville, MN 55337 Dear Superintendent Bell: . Enclosed is my review and comment statement on your proposed constriction project. This statement is based on information supplied by your office together with pertinent infor- mation available from Department of Education sources. As M.S. 121.15 requires, I have commented on the education and economic advisability of your project. The attached "review and comment statement" shall be published in a legal newspaper of general circulation in the area for at least 20 days, but not more than 60 days, prior to any referendum for bonds or the solicitation of Ods for the construction of the proposed facility. The Introduction part does not hive to be published; however, I encourage that it be -dobe in order to adequately explain the. -review and comment process to the public. The remainder must be published in its entirety. If you have any questions, please contact Floyd Erickson, Facilities Specialist, District Financial Management and Transportation, 936 Capitol Square Buildings -St. Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone: 612-296-2288. k - The use of capital expenditure levy funds for this project, in the extent indicated in your project proposal, is approved in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 275.125, Subd. lla(c). If funding involves a bond referendum, please report the results so that we may complete our annual report to the Legislature as required. Preliminary -plans for this project are required to be submitted as they are further developed. Final plans are required to be submitted and approved (M.S. 121.15, Subd. 2). Thank you for working with us in meeting the requirements of the legislation, and furthering our mutual interest in providing an efficient system of quality education in Minnesota. Sincer , Dr. Ruth E. Randall Commissioner of Education RERIIFE:L3f :mhs35-5 Enclosure cc: School Board Chairpersons✓ 9 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 3 THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION'S REVIEW AND COMMENT ' ON THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION PROJECT OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 191, BURNSVILLE-EAGAN-SAVAGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INTRODUCTION The Department of Education is required to perform a review and comment on any proposal for the construction of an educational facility which requires a capital expenditure in excess of $400,000. No school district may conduct a referendum for bonds or solicit bids for construction prior to the Department'& review and comment. Each school board proposing to engage in the construction of an educational facility shall submit to the Commissioner of Education a proposal which con- tains the following information: (a) The geographic area likely to be served, whether within or outside the boundaries of the school district; (b) the projected school population to be served; (c) the reasonably anticipated need for the facility or service to be provided; (d) a description of the construction in reasonable detail, including capital expenditures contemplated, estimated annual operating cost, and energy efficiency; (e) existing institutions within the area to be served, so far as is known, that offer the same or similar service; 'the extent'of utili- zation of existing -facilities or services; the extent to which space is available from other sources, including institutions for higher education or other public buildings; and the anticipated effect that the proposal will have on existing facilities and services; (f) the anticipated benefit to the area that will result from the proposal; (a) the relationship of the proposed construction to any priorities, if known, which have been established for the area to be'served; (h) the availability and manner of financing the proposed construction and the estimated date to begin and complete the project; and (i) any desegregation requirements, provided they cannot be met by any other reasonable means. If, after the review and comment from the Department of Education, the School Board decides to proceed with their construction plans, they shall publish the Department's review and comment in a legal newspaper of general circulation in the area. The review and comment shall be published at least 20 days, but not more than 60 days, -prior to any referendum for bonds or the solicitation of bids for construction of the proposed educational facility. /6 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT Independent.School District 191, Burnsville—Eagan—Savage Public Schools, proposes to construct an elementary school in the city of Savage for the purpose of accommodating the enrollment growth in the western part of the district. The new school will house approximately 725 students. Presently, there are enough preschool students in the area of the proposed new school to fully utilize it when completed. The district believes its enrollment projections to be conservative and that it needs to continue providing neighborhood—type elementary schools in the growing residential areas of the district. The district is currently operating with eight elementary schools. A ninth school, Cedar School, is located in the far eastern_ portion of the district and is being utilized for a variety of purposes including: 1. Preschool instruction. 2. Early childhood and family education. 3, hearing impaired (toddler and preschool). 4. District media services. 5. Alternative school programs for high school dropouts. 6. Nonprofit day care and developmental learning through Dakota, Inc. The district considers the Cedar building to be fully utilized and that if reopened for use as an elementary school would cause the displacement of the programs and services listed above. The district has temporary classrooms on five of its elementary sites, which they will continue to use. All of the district's facilities are presently operating at or near full capacity. The total cost of the proposed construction is estimated at $6,985,000. The financing will be done through the sale of bonds pending voter approval. REVIEW AND COMMENT STATEMENT Based on the Department's analysis of the district's required documentation and any other pertinent information from sources of the Department of Education, the Commissioner of Education judges the proposed construction to be educationally and economically advisable. The proposed construction continues the historical pattern of district development whereby neighborhood elementary schools are constructed in areas experiencing substantial new residential growth. The construction provides the district's present high growth area with a neighborhood school comparable in size, quality, and travel distance with existing schools in the district. . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE Persons desiring'additional information regarding the s bl district suintendent's office. �-i-4�� -Sr. Ruth E. Randall Commissioner of Education RER/ FE:L3e:mhs36-5 8/24/87. this proposal should contact 0 ELEMENTARY ENROLLMENT CUR NEW YEAR K 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL CAP CAP 86-87 749 727 670 681 657 635 629 4748 5125 87-88 751 775 717 679 688 664 634 4908 5125 --- 88-89 803 778 764 727 686 695 663 5116 5125 --- 89-90 804 831 767 775 735 693 694 5299 90-91 904 832 820 778 783 743 692 5552 91-92 942 936 821 832 786 791 742 5850 5125 5850 5125 5850 5125 5850 August 28, 1987 Tom Hedges, Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: City of Eagan Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Update 1980 Comprehensive Guide Plan Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 12872-5 Dear Mr. Hedges: Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building Seventh and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone (612) 291-6359 At its meeting on August 27, 1987, the Metropolitan Council considered city of Eagan's comprehensive plan. This consideration was based on a report of the Metropolitan and Community Development Committee, Referral Report No. 87-77. A copy of this report is attached. The Council approved the following recommendations contained in the above report: 1. Approve the Eagan comprehensive plan amendment with the exception of: a. Provisional and conditional uses within aircraft noise exposure zones as identified in Figure 1 and; b. The eight (change) new commercial planned development areas. The Council will reconsider these areas at such time as the city demonstrates that these areas would not have a negative impact on the metropolitan highway system. 2. Direct Eagan to submit plans to the Council for any development occurring within the shaded areas identified in Figure 1, and include documentation demonstrating that sufficient noise attenuation measures are being required of the developer, including but not limited to those discussed in the Council's Aviation Chapter. 3. Encourage Eagan to complete its Aviation Chapter as soon as possible. An Equal Opportunity Employer Page 2 Tom Hedges Please note that recommendation 1b on the staff report has been revised. Sincerely, Steve Keefe Chair SK: 11 Attachment cc: Dale Runkle, Planning, Director, City of Eagan John S. Voss, Planning Consultant R.A. Odde, Metropolitan Waste Control -Commission Barbara Senness, Metropolitan Council Staff v ., Metropolitan Council Meeting of August 13, 1987 Business Item: B-2 M E T R O P O L I T A N C O U N C I L Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 612-291-6359 REPORT OF THE METROPOLITAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Referral Report No. 87-77 DATE: August 7, 1987 TO: Metropolitan Council SUBJECT: City of Eagan Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Update 1980 Comprehensive Guide Plan, Metropolitan Council District 15, Council Referral No. 12872-5 BACKGROUND At its meeting on August 20, 1987, the Metropolitan and Community Development Committee discussed a staff report and recommendations dealing with the review of Eagan's Update to its 19080 Comprehensive Guide Plan. ISSUES AND CONCERNS Barbara Senness, Council staff (ext. 419), presented the report and answered questions from the Committee. John Voss, planning consultant to the city, indicated that Eagan has followed its plan closely to date and therefore the plan has required few changes. He also noted that the city has a history of promoting the production of lower-cost housing. Barb Senness noted than an additional commercial planned development area was changed by plan amendment. Therefore the text on page 2 of the staff report will be changed to reflect that and identify which parcels have been approved. Recommendation l.b. will also be revised. RECOMMENDATIONS That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Approve the Eagan comprehensive plan amendment with the exception of: a. Provisional and conditional uses within aircraft noise exposure zones as identified in Figure 1 and; b. The eight (change) new commercial planned development areas. The Council will reconsider these areas at such time as the city demonstrates that these areas would not have a negative impact on the metropolitan highway system. -2- 2. Direct Eagan to submit plans to the Council for any development occurring within the shaded areas identified in Figure 1, and include documentation demonstrating that sufficient noise attenuation measures are being required of the developer, including but not limited to those discussed in the Council's Aviation Chapter. 3. Encourage Eagan to complete its Aviation Chapter as soon as possible. Respectfully submitted, Joan Campbell, Chair /6 M E T R O P O L I T A N C 0 U N C I L 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 DATE: Revised August 13, 1987 TO: Metropolitan and Community Development Committee FROM: Long Range Planning Department (Barbara Senness) SUBJECT: City of Eagan Comprehensive Plan Amendment Update 1980 Comprehensive Guide Plan Metropolitan Council District 15 Metropolitan Council Referral No. 12872-5 AUTHORITY TO REVIEW The Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1976 requires that amendments to local comprehenive plans be prepared and submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and adopted in the same manner as the original plans (Minnesota Statutes 1473.864, Subd. 2, 1978). Guidelines adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. 473.864 for reviewing proposed amemdments provide for a 90 -day review period for amendments potentially affecting one or more of the metropoolitan systems, and a 60 -day review period for amendments that do not have a potential impact on metropolitan systems. Eagan submitted its proposed amendment on May 13, 1987. On May 28, 1987, the Chair determined that the amendment presented a potential impact on the metropolitan airport system; therefore, the 90 -day review period applies. The 90 -day deadline for review of the amendment is August 11, 1987. However, the city has requested that the review period be extended to AuEust 27, 1987. DESCRIPTION OF PLAN AMENDMENT This amendment is intended to be a housekeeping update of the city's 1980 plan. Most of the changes were an outgrowth of daily activity, rather than a wholesale review and revision. ANALYSIS The following analysis addresses Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework, transportation, airport and housing issues. Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework The MDIF classifies Eagan as a developing area. During the past few years, Eagan has been one of the fastest growing communities in the region. The city is now projecting that its population will reach 60,000 by the year 2000. Council forecasts indicate a somewhat lower year 2000 population of 52,500. The city's year 2000 employment projection of 24,000 is slightly lower than the Council's forecast of 27,000. The Eagan amendment indicates a number of areas as "Commercial Planned Development." The amendment does not indicate proposed intensity of use for these areas. /7 Transportation This plan amendment does not include a revision of the transportation section of the city's plan. However, the amendment indicates that the city is planning to develop a revised transportation plan in the near future. Eagan has adopted a goal to protect the city's transportation system by controlling development and not permitting uses which would generate trips in excess of highway system capacity. This goal is consistent with metropolitan policies and should be encouraged. However, it will be difficult for Eagan to implement this goal until the city completes its transportation plan and determines the highway system capacity. For instance, the amendment designates nine new parcels as commercial planned development. The city should analyze the uses and intensity of uses for each of these planned developments as part of the transportation planning process to determine that the highway capacity will not be exceeded. The amendment also mentions that the city will define a "Freeway Development" land use designation to promote quality development and protect freeway interchanges from traffic congestion. This city should coordinate this effort with the development of the transportation plan. Airports This comprehensive plan update does not include the adoption of the Council's Guidelines for Compatibility of Land Use with Aircraft Noise. .The plan acknowledges that the issues and activities relating to aircraft noise were considered in the scope of the amendment, but no further references are made. Eagan staff has indicated that an aviation chapter is being prepared, but this chapter has been forthcoming for several years. Some of the delay can be attributed to the Metropolitan Airports Commission's (MAC) Part 150 Study, which was only recently completed and requires federal approval by the end of the year. The Part 150 Study identifies and attempts to address the most significant concern of Eagan: that aircraft are being allowed to deviate from normal flight paths, thus making the planned noise contours less meaningful and spreading significant noise levels south of the adopted noise contour boundaries. Eagan would like to proceed with compatibility planning once this issue is successfully resolved, and may be interested in funding that may be made available as part of the Part 150 process. The Metropolitan Council approved a model noise ordinance in 1986 to help implement its land use compatibility guidelines. The 1987 Legislature passed a bill exempting the ordinance from state building standards, thereby facilitating local government adoption of the model ordinance or comparable standards. Approximately ten land use areas in Eagan currently fall under the "provisional" or "conditional" land uses identified by the Council's Aviation Chapter (see Figure 1). Several of these areas have already been fully or partially developed, and given Eagan's growth rate, many of the other areas will likely be developed in the future. The city has not proposed any "incompatible" land uses in currently undeveloped areas. 06 Eagan has a history of being responsive to concerns about land use compatibility. Examples include construction measures on commercial buildings and deed statements on residential properties. Although such efforts, in the absense of formal adoption of the guidelines, are commendable, the Council considers a standing commitment in the form of comprehensive plan language more desirable. Housinw This amendment changes the dwelling unit mix in Eagan to reflect a slight decrease in low-density zones and an increase in high-density zones. The increase in high-density zones should ensure greater opportunities for a variety of housing types and costs in Eagan. Eagan also plans to encourage 300 to 500 high-cost housing units over the next ten years. One of the policies being considered to accomplish this objective is to provide financial incentives by reducing land development costs. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The difference between the Council's population forecast for Eagan and the city's population projections is not dramatic, given Eagan's fast rate of growth and the possibility that the city's projections are based on higher persons per household assumptions. 2. The Metropolitan Council cannot determine the impact of the commercial Tanned development areas on the metro Titan highway system until the cit completes its transportation plan and determines the highway system capacity. 3. This amendment does not adequately incorporate the Council's Land Use Compatibility Guidelines. 4. Eagan is -awaiting the implementation of the Part 150 Study by MAC, particularly the "Eagan Corridor" measure, before the city plans to prepare its airport chapter. 5. On a case-by-case basis, Eagan has frequently been responsive to Council concerns regarding land use compatibility. 6. The land use compatibility guidelines, model noise -ordinance, and recent state legislation provide tools for Eagan to use in its aircraft noise compatibility planning. 7. If Eagan adopts a policy of providing financial incentives to encourage high-cost housing, it should offer these incentives to all price ranges of housing. RECOMMENDATIONS That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Approve the Eagan comprehensive plan amendment with the exception of: a. Provisional and conditional uses within aircraft noise exposure zones as identified in Figure 1 and; /y b. The nine new commercial Dlanned develo_cment areas. The Council will reconsider these areas at such time as the city demonstrates that these areas would not have a negative impact on the metropolitan highway system. 2. Direct Eagan to submit plans to the Council for any development occurring within the shaded areas identified in Figure 1, and include documentation demonstrating that sufficient noise attenuation measures are being required of the developer, including but not limited to those discussed in the Council's Aviation Chapter. 3. Encourage Eagan to complete its Aviation Chapter as soon as possible. BGS1614, PHLPAI LO ,1 1 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - AUGUST 1987 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Electrical 164 19367 Plumbing 85 811 HVAC 1.35 1,005 Water Softener 43 120 Signs 7 88 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 0 7 7,y NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED YTD MONTHLY TYPE I NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 13 FOUNDATION 3 $ $ 45.00 $ $ 45.00 472 SINGLE FAMILY 49 4,659,000 23,602.00 11,820.00 121,150.00 42 DUPLEX 2 110,000 692.00 346.00 4,497.00 88 TOWNHOUSE 4 307,000 1,688.50 844.25 9,495.25 3 CONDO 0 8 APT BLDGS 4 1,954,000 6,676.00 3,338.00 115,631.00 0 AGRICULTURAL 25 COMMERCIAL 1 770,000 23446.00 1,223.00 10,280.00 79 COMM/IND REMODEL 8 185,500 1,385.70 638.30 2,117.00 6 COMM/IND ADDITION 2 5,022,000 12,256.00 6,128.00 58,741.00 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 INSTITUTIONAL 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES 1 580,000 1,786.00 893.00 10,630.00 32 RES. GARAGES 4 22,800. 269.00 --- 281.50 26 RES. ADDITIONS 2 43,000 342.60 171.30 536.40 16 SWIM POOL 2 20,000 187.00 --- 197.00 211 MISCELLANEOUS 23 2,583,475 7,472.40 107.50 8,724.65 2 DEMOLISH 2 HOUSE MOVES (CHURCH)) 1 30.00 30.00 1 ADJUSTMENTS 1,028 TOTALS 106 16,256,775 58,878.20 25,509.35 340,238.80 YEAR-TO-DATE 117,548,836 478,179.98 226,988.35 3,042,773.08 7,y z 0 H H O H H H z H NQ P4 a P4 a a otD o O o 0 0 o O o 0 0 U Pa U U U U U U U U U U O O v1 u•1 611 Ln Lr) Ln Ln u'1 O O V3 O O I, N r- N N Ln N -It vl o W W O O W N %0 It N r -i N to 4 N M E O O � O H p O O v1 Lr) Lf) Ln Ln Ln vl vl W O O N r- N r- r- 00 N �t a 14 ni O� ao 1; ori 9 ap �D C%00 �o O W N 00 O a w �o o O o 0 0 0 oO o 0 0 0 H 0 u, u, o v, Lf) , r- u, Lr) v, v, H ll� 1D 00 9 00 00 00r4 rl 00 -zr r- u'1 V) jr4 -t O -1 14 14 M N . 1 N 114 W N H N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o u, o O H O O O N N .t O t- 00 O N r -d N �o M -4 N p Lr) O U cn w crS cn W6 U H r-4 N W z 1:4 P4 0z x w w Pr a U w c7 H a P4 o x aPa _aa a aa E-4 w a O 41 O F WLe P4 w z a U ¢ Upq z F d d W a D H z x U 3 u O O 3 x U a n z fm 4 N4 z= N x H Pa a N H P4 " w P4 A A A A a N A 9 a4 P4 A H P4 a Pa W az P4 a, z 04 P+_ F H z U a A N H ,a W H ;m _ U U H P4 a W W Po pq x' Pa A n U U A Cl > a Pa O F o a .-4 z w W u w 04' z w �4 d zzcn zza Pa 0W0 daHA0PCI , x V)�4 W �G W A W H A F H A w d U 0 U' W d �4 to 3 Pa 04 F pq U W DG U u z A O w> x U W Hx E-4 -c4 cnww P4 d H zU'3uw.axd py 00 O x C] W z cn A O P4 W _ M d d d4 d> H U a A az .4UA3z Cl>4P4 c9w0w0w.4w q H H O WO 0 d d H a Pa ^ P4 Cl p4 O AC N W �t W A w a1 ^ _ r -I M ri W 11-+' .-4 1-1 -4 'D al -t pq M Ctrl o Pa O Pa O O M Ln M O m M m O W 00 ^ 00n ^ O n 00 ^ - M N 00 r- M M '--� 00 I- r4 %o H %D N M N N N M M M -4 O� H -4 r-4 Ma t Marta rta.-104 -4 --1aHa1-1a414 H O+ 00 Ln O -4 M N Ln �o 00 C, M ON O d .t N N N Ln It ra a: o o O 0 .-.1 0 0 0 O o o O aw t � � � It -:T 4 It � � It NQ PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE AUGUST 1987 MM.TT-FAMTi_Y RRRAlrnn V TYPE MO. # OF PERMITS MO. # OF BIIILDINGS YTD # OF BIIILDINGS M0. # OF UNITS YTD. # OF UNITS # OF PERMITS VOIDED # OF UNITS MOVED I DUPLEX 2 1 •21 T 2 42 3 -PLEB 4-PLEX 4 1 19 4 76 5-PLE% 1 5 6-PLE% 7-PLE% 2 12 8-PLE% 10-PLEX 12-PLEX 16-PLEX 3 48 APT. BLDG. 4 4 8 64 160 OTHER TOTAL: 10 6 54 70 343 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - AUGUST 1986 SUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE 3uilding 154 1,130 'slectrical ?lumbing 1 208 3VAC 900 dater Softener 1,044 Signs 186 Sept— dell, Cesspool, Septic TankLl� 70 1 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED YTD MnMTM-v 6 FOUNDATION 663 SINGLE FAM 28 DUPLEX 157 TOWNHOUSE 9 CONDO 1 APT BLDGS 0 AGRICULTURI 17 COMMERCIAL 46 COMM/IND RE 4 COMM/IND AT 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 INSTITUTION 10 PUBLIC FACI 0$ -- I - 91 7,441,000 $ 34,223.50 17,106.25 $ 199,263.75 7 154,000 728.00 364.00 4,338.00 12 2,532,000 8,267.00 4,183.50 85,203.50 1 778,000 2,128.00 1,064.00 25,389.00 0 82,25 508.75 127 MISCELLANEOUS - 0 67,168 769.50 -- 809.00i 2 14,005,000 35,233.50 17,591.50 132,016.50 8 204,544 1,235.00 555.25 1,895.75, 1 222,000 738.00 369.00• 1,218.00 0 154 27,129,612 84,465.5 41,526.5 0 YEAR_TO_DATE 117,886,080 452,512.00 7 1 583 000 Im -- 50.50 6,047.00 23 RES. GARAGES _ 3 23,000 199.50 —-- 211.00 19 RES. ADDITIONS 4 67,000 478.00 .210:75 722.25 18 SWIM POOL 4 52,900 400.00 82,25 508.75 127 MISCELLANEOUS 18 67,168 769.50 -- 809.00i 0 DEMOLISH 0 2 HOUSE MOVES 1 -- 15.00 -- 15.00 1,130 TOTALS 154 27,129,612 84,465.5 41,526.5 457,637.50 YEAR_TO_DATE 117,886,080 452,512.00 218,644.95 2,894,169.45 Im PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE AUGUST 1986 MM.TT-FAMTT.V RRRAWnnWLT TYPE # OF PERMITS # OF BUILDINGS # OF l UNITS 1 VALUATION PERMIT FEES SURCHARGE PLAN REVIEW FEES TOTAL FEES DUPLEX 2 1 2 $ 154,000 $ 728.00 77.00 $ 364.00 $ 4,338.00 4-PLEX 3584 KENNEBEC DR u 6-PLEX 2 2 12 634,000 1,951.00 317.00 975.50 21,495.50 7-PLEX 7 1 7 308,000 1,792.00 154.00 896.00 13,489.00 8-PLEX 2 2 16 974,000 2,801.00 487.00 1,450.50 29,074.50 12 UNIT 1 1 12 616,000 1,723.00 308.00 861.50 21,144.50 16 UNIT 1 1 16 778,000 2,128.00 389.00 1,064.00 25,389.00 TOTALS 15 8 65 3,464,000 11,123.00 1,732.00 5,611.50 114,930.50 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTTONAL BRFARTXZVN BLDG PERMIT STATE PLAN REV PERMIT # ADDRESS & LEGAL OWNER VALUATION FEE SURCHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCDP. 12505 3584 KENNEBEC DR u L 1, B 30, SECT 17 L. WENZEL $ 5,000 $ 50.50 2.50 -- 53.00 P.F. IM; 12487 3501 COACHMAN RD L 1, B 28, SECT 16 CITY OF EAGAN 1,200,000 N/A 580.00 1 N/A 3,905.00 P.F. NE;4 4391 LEXINGTON AVE 12449 L 015, B 30, SECT 26 CITY OF EAGAN 82,000 N/A 41.00 N/A 516.00 P.F. NEJ 12450 841 WILDERNESS RD L 023, B 75, SECT 26 CITY OF EAGAN 83,000 N/A 41.50 N/A 41.50 P.F. NEW - 1, 12451 841 WILDERNESS RD L 023, B 75, SECT 26 CITY OF EAGAN 76,000 N/A 38.00 N/A 513.00 P.F. NEJe 12452 4440 NICOLS RD L 012 B 76 SECT 30 CITY OF EAGAN 54,000 N/A 27.00 N/A 502.00 F.F. NEW 12453 980 NORTHVIEW PARK RD L 012 B 52 SECT 23 CITY OF EAGAN 83,000 N/A 41.50 N/A 516.50 P.F. NE: 12410 3199 PILOT KNOB RD L 1, B 1, SPERRY PARK SPERRY CORP 14,000,000 35,183.00 1,950.00 17,591.50 131,963.50 COMM NEW' 12392 1075 LONE OAK RD BEL1. LEXINGTON NW BELL TELE 5,000 50.50 2.50 ------ 53.00 COMM NEW 12533 5126EY -L ECT 9WY LULL ENGR $ 222,000 738.00 111.00 369.00 1,218.0 COMM ADD 12499 1284 TOWN CTR DR L 2 B 1 T.C. 70 2ND FED. LAND CO 1,344 23.50 1.00 24.5 COMM IMP 1275 CORP CTR DR _ 12489 L 141. B 03 EAG CTR PK 1 OPUS CORP 75,000 358.00 37.50 179.00 574.5 COMM IMP 12469 2121 CLIFF DR FED. LAND CO 7,500 68.50 4.00 74.5 COMM IMP L 1 B 1 CED CLIFF COMM K 12463 1279 TOWN DR CTR L 2, B 1, T.C. 70 2ND ADD FED. LAND CO 18,500 134.50 9.50 67.25 211.2 COMM IMP 1380 CORP CTR CURVE 12503 L 2 B 2, EAG OFC PK 2ND NW MUT'L LIFE 43,200 256.00 22.00 128.00 406.0 COMM IMP 4178 KNOB DR 12427 L 2, B 2, KNOB HILL PROF RUD, DR JEFF 18,000 128.50 9.00 64.25 201.71 COMM IMP 12534 1312 TOWN CENTRE DR L 2 B 1 T.C. 70 2ND FED. LAND CO 39,000 233.50 19.50 116.75 369.7 COMM.IMP 12429 3938 BEAU D -RUE DR L 2, B 10, SECT 19 D.C.R. CO 2,000 32.50 1.00 33.5 COMM IMP M STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT Or REVENUE Mail Station 2240 St. Paul, MN 55146-2240 August 31, 1987 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road P. O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Mr. Hedges: The appeal you submitted for a payable 1988 levy limit base adjustment for the City of Eagan has been reviewed. The City of Eagan's requested levy limit base adjustment of $824,961 is based on the following reasons: 1. The use of reserve funds in the amount of $98,000 to reduce 1987 property tax levies; 2. Loss of Federal Revenue Sharing; 3. Comparable Worth expenses; 4. Increased expenditures to maintain basic services provided by the city. I have recommended to John E. Haynes, Assistant Commissioner in the Department of Revenue, that $726,961 of the $824,961 requested levy limit base adjustment be denied. A determination has yet to be made on consideration number one, the $98,000 involved in the use of reserve funds. More documentation is needed showing that projected fund balances for December 31, 1987 are lower than the fund balances for December 31, 1986, and that those funds were used to lower property tax levies. Attached is an example of a budget summary that we would like the City of Eagan to submit to the Department of Revenue to justify their statement that fund balance reserves from 1986 were used in 1987 to reduce the property tax levy. In addition, we would like a detail of the revenue and expenditures which make up the summary. The detail can be a xeroxed copy of a financial statement or audit report. The reason for my recommended denial of the remaining reasons, numbers 2, 3 and 4, is that the City of Eagan's appeal meets none of three reasons for allowing a levy limit base adjustment as outlined in the "Levy Limit Appeal Guidelines." The three reasons for allowing a levy limit base adjustment are: 1. The expenditure of reserve funds in 1987 which reduced the local unit's payable 1987 property tax levy; AN EQUAL OPPOT7TY EMPLOYER Page 2 City of Eagan 8/31/87 2. State mandates imposed by the 1987 Minnesota Legislature which require expenditures in 1988 for a new service or activity or for an increased level of an already existing service or activity; and 3. Expenditures for extraordinary or emergency situations which could not have been anticipated by the 1987 Minnesota Legislature and which are in excess of reserves that a local unit would be reasonably expected to maintain to deal with unanticipated expenditures. The loss of federal revenue sharing is not a valid reason for an appeal because it is based on the loss of a levy limit adjustment authorized for prior years. For payable 1987, the calculation of a city's levy limit included an adjustment for any loss in federal revenue sharing. The 1987 Legislature repealed that adjustment for payable 1988. The fourth criterion of the "Levy Limit Appeal Guidelines" states that no appeal based on the loss of an adjustment authorized for prior years is to be accepted. In regard to your argument that the levy limit base adjustment calculated for the City of Eagan by the Department of Revenue last year was incorrect, it was done in accordance with the levy limit law. At the time that the payable 1987 levy limitation was certified, August 8, 1986, the 1987 federal revenue sharing amounts were not known - Congress had not yet acted to repeal revenue sharing. The levy limit law at that time allowed us to use the revenue sharing amounts for the two previous years, 1985 and 1986, to determine the levy limit base adjustment for the loss of federal revenue sharing. This was allowed on the basis that we did not know what the payable 1987 amounts of revenue sharing would be. The city's compliance with the Local Government Pay Equity Act of 1984 does not constitute a 1987 mandate. The city could have started its plan earlier and the levy for it would be in the base for payable 1988. The costs could also have been anticipated by the 1987 Legislature. The costs could also have been covered in the regular city reserve fund. The fourth reason for appeal was increasing costs for basic services in the amount of $434,200. Increased costs of maintaining basic services is not a valid basis of appeal under the 'extraordinary or emergency' clause because it not an unanticipated expense nor does the expenditure exceed reasonable reserves. You have until September 21, 1987 to respond to the recommendations concerning your city's appeal. Commissioner Triplett will then make a final decision taking into account both the recommendations and your city's response. You will be notified of Commissioner Triplett's final decision by letter on or before October 1, 1987. If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me. Very truly yours, XdBo C -p- I Jk WALLACE O. DAHL, Director Local Government Aids and Analysis Division WOD:RBG:Scf cc: Finance Director/City Clerk Van Overbeke Mayor and City Council members Senator Howard Knutson Representative Arthur Seaberg ?i� EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT ----"T' FOR MONTH OF May 1987 WORK PERFORMED TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 751 Training 686 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 244 Station Maintenance 126 Fire Prevention 22 Administrative 393 TOTAL MANPOWER Available Nights Available Days Available Days and Nights Available Rotating On Leave Rookies FIRE/RESCUE TYPE Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME None TOTAL 2,222 STATION #] STATION #2 STATION #3 14 14 9 6 4 3 3 5 3 3 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 26 25 19 NUMBER $ LOSS 7 9 7 15 7 5 TOTAL 50 LOCATION $ 0,00 i OCCUPANCY $ LOSS TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JON HOHENSTEIN, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DATE: 9/8/87 SUBJECT: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM - DAKOTA COUNTY PROPOSAL In recent months, Dakota County approached staff with a proposal to consider the development of a geographic information system (GIS) for County and City use. A GIS, as its name implies, is a computer software which correlates various databases with geographic locations (for instance plat conditions with specific parcels, etc.). Certain systems include limited mapping and design capacity, such that information such as lot dimensions, building pad locations and the like can be stored and accessed as well. In short, a well -conceived GIS can provide virtually any information about a defined area in graphic or report formats. The other advantage of such an automatic system is that it can reduce duplication of effort and inefficiencies resulting from various departments or units of government maintaining similar information or maps for different purposes. Through on line systems, plat information entered in the City Planning Department could be promptly accessed in Building Inspections to determine whether permits could be issued or in Finance and Public Works for assessment computations. Various levels of clearance and access would insure that information has maximum accessibility, but limited control and changeability. Dakota County has budgeted for a feasibility study to define County/City needs and to bhoose a vendor for such a system. The County proposes to begin a pilot project in 1988 in which base maps would be established and all parcels in the project.city or cities would be digitized. Beginning in 1989, cities could begin to access the information to develop applications of their own. The choice of city or cities in which to do the pilot project will depend on the willingness of cities to dedicate staff time and resources to the digitization for their particular base maps. The County is especially interested in Eagan since the rapid development pace throughout the City has resulted in a large proportion the base -map being current. Unfortunately, the County did anticipate a need to request local financial participation in 1988 until very recently. As the budget process was well underway, it seemed inappropriate to request an additional allocation from the general fund. As we discussed, alternative funding sources were considered, the most logical of which would appear to be cable franchise fees. Because such systems are eminently valuable to utilities and quasi -utilities, such as our cable franchise, initial participation in such a program can definitely be defined as cable -related. The system can be utilized to do line extension analysis, basic system design, as -built maintenance and the like. The system is so valuable to line utilities, that Dakota Electric has expressed an intention to participate in the costs of its MR development just to have access to its information. In addition, the Cable Budget for 1988 currently has a surplus due to the system's high penetration and relatively few capital requests by the City. The County has requested City participation in the digitization of the City base map at a rate of one-half of the budget approximation of $3/parcel. Based on a conservative projection of the last four years, Eagan will likely have roughly 15,000 parcels by the end of 1987. The City's participation then would need to be budgeted at $22,500 for 1988. If Dakota Electric were to become involved as they have indicated, the cost would drop to one-third of the total, or about $15,000. In addition, the City would be expected to commit an appropriate amount of staff time to system development. This would primarily come through the MIS Coordinator, with a lesser time commitment from the various departments which would interface with such a system. It is not anticipated that this time commitment will be excessive and should be manageable within the course of normal work assignments. If the City Council desires, staff can approach the Joint Cable Commission with this suggested amendment to the Cable budget at the Commission's meeting on September 10. If you have any questions, please let me know. A copy of the County proposal is attached for your review. A inistrative Assistant Att. 3/ DAKOTA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & PROGRAM MANAGEMENT September 3, 1987 7300 WEST 147th STREET, SUITE x503 Tom Hedges Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom, JEFFREY J. CONNELL DIRECTOR (612) 431-1158 APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124 Dakota County is interested in the development of a geographic information system (GIS) that would benefit both the County and the City. A geographic information system involves the development of computerized mapping, drafting and information system with the ability to relate property tax data, permit records, and utility information (eg. cable TV, sewer and water, electric). On August 11, 1987, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners directed County staff to investigate the potential for development of a geographic information system among cities and utilities. The County has completed surveys and interviews which have identified problems among County departments, cities and utilities concerning duplication of records and lack of current data. Those problems create inefficiencies in the delivery of services to the public. From our discussions with your staff, other cities and utilities, we believe that a Geographic Information System has the potential for improving coordination and productivity 'in government services. County residents, public agencies and private businesses should have the ability to obtain the most accurate information about property and associated utilities without visiting several government agencies in different locations throughout the County. We are interested in the participation and level of commitment that your organization can make towards development of a Geographic Information System. We would like to involve cities and utilities in the development process so that the selection and design of a system will have the highest degree of compatibility and functionality for various organizations. Would 'you commit staff to investigating the feasibility for joint system development? - Would you participate in the design and funding of a pilot project? Would you contribute to the cost of preparing a computerized parcel base -map for your area of the County (1988 or future years)? 37— . .. Z .., 1-1in1 -^MTI IN IIT\/ nACH nVCr) Tom Hedges City of Eagan September 3, 1987 Page 2 Dakota County is in the process of reviewing a proposed budget for 1988. A portion of the proposed budget includes funds to begin a 5 -year program for development of a Geographic Information System. One of the first steps in the development of a system is the preparation of a computerized parcel base map which can be used by the County, cities, and utilities for the implementation of GIS. The costs for development of this parcel base map is estimated a $3/parcel if done by an independent data conversion vendor. We are interested in the participation of your city in the cost sharing of this data base for use by the City, as well as the County. We hope that the cities will wish to commit both financial and staff resources for the joint development of a GIS. We hope to involve as many cities and utilities as possible in the development of a GIS. We anticipate selecting an area of the County to begin the development of the parcel base map based on the interest and commitment shown by the cities and utilities in Dakota County. We have scheduled a meeting for September 11, in our offices in Apple Valley, to discuss these issues further. (See attached agenda.) We will have a presentation of the concepts of a geographic information system and discuss the steps for involving cities and utilities in the process. If you have any questions or concerns, please give me a call at 431-1158. Sincerely, Allen Moe PROGRAM MANAGER AM/jmn Enclosure cc: Jon Hohenstein Steve Schwanke Kristi Morast r BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE August 11, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87-999 Motion by Commissioner VOSS Seconded by Commissioner S _ r f 1 a nd WHEREAS, the problems of records duplication, data currency, and interrelationships of geographic data usage among County departments, cities and other agencies creates inefficiencies in the delivery of services to the public; and WHEREAS, development of a Geographic Information System has the potential for improving coordination and increasing productivity of government services; and WHEREAS, there is widespread support among County departments, cities, and utilities for the development and use of a Geographic Information System. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That staff be directed to prepare recommendations for the development of a Geographic Information System; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That staff investigate the potential for joint system development of a Geographic Information System among cities and utilities. YES NO Harris X Harris Mahar X Mahar Voss X Voss Loading X Loading Streafland X Streefland State of Minnesota County of Dakota I. Norma B. Marsh, duly elected, qualified and acting County Auditor of the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution with the original minutes of the proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners, Dakota County, Minnesota, at their session held on the 11th day Of August 19-U— now on file in my office, and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof. Witness my hand and official seal at Hastings. Minnesota, this day of dtV ®F lacog X1'"1 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members September 9, 1987 THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Re: City Contract 87-16 Nicols Road Street Improvements To Whom It May Concern: The City of Eagan has entered into contract with Valley Paving, Inc., for the reconstruction of Nicols Road from Diffley Road to Beau D`Rue Drive. Nicols Road will be closed to through traffic for approximately six to seven weeks, depending upon weather conditions, commencing on Monday, September 14, 1987. Rahn Road has been designated as the alternate route during this construction. Access will be maintained for local residents and businesses only. The City realizes that this causes an inconvenience to all parties concerned and would appreciate your cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact the City of Eagan Engineering Department at ¢54-8100. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, chael P. Foertsch Assistant City Engineer MF/j j 35 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY MINUTES OF A REGULAV;._.:9ZE-T-1--NG' OF"TRE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL %PAN, MINNESUTRA S4ftEMBER. 1, ,1987 A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, -September 1, 1997 at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan municipal Center. Present were Mayor Blomquis.t.:.:-a.n4..-:-Co..Qp*:i-.1--members Smith, Wachter, Egan and Ellison. In a d d i t D' I. d:!-ty:::* * n&-ztistrator Tom Hedges, Public :'L]** Works Director Tom Colbert, City:.-:::.Plannq6,:f-,:: Dale Runkle, Consulting Engineers Robert Rosene and Mark- Hanson, and City Attorney Paul Hauge were present. AGEND Mayor Blomquist noted that the Wilderness Run Road hearing was not included on the agenda and the public hearing that was scheduled will be continued. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to adopt the agenda as presented.-V.pted in favor. .'%Jd I NUT .... .. . . ..... . Wachter moved, Egan second;g!d.**:-:.:E':.:6::-*:"-M*'Ot ion to approve the 30 pages of minutes of the regul.'4t.:.*:,:--kh;�!*,�-:ting of August 18, 1987. All councilmembers voted in fay.-;b'**j'f:-:.--- MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOCIATION CITATION Park Director' Ken ud-ed Bruce Anderson, a representative of the and Park Association who presented an award to the Eagan P�t:k & �e:Preation Department. The purpose of the award was for th0:::')'G-rou-ff-d Pounders" running series, coordinated by Apple Valley, BU'--r*'*nsvi!:�;*:�, Lakeville and Eagan, and the award was presented to Mayor B 0mquD15':*t'-. Dorothy Peterson and d . Paula Nowariak were present in the audience and recognized by Ken Vraa' for their very diligent recreational service work for the Park Department. VOLUNTEER FIRE DEVA-UTMENT ... ........... ***r.*�_,pared to date for the Fire Thomas Hedges described::*::*:t.*-h.�x-::::.v.l-ati.s.:.:::::� was present and made Station No. 4. Ken South'a"t.i.i....' the following report: 1. He noted that 23 new recruits wire approved with 91 persons on the fire department roster at the present time. 1 Council Minutes September 1, 1997 2. He recommended thq'h:: the Coun"**. "*� authorize Arthur Dickey & Associates to proceed wi:irIh - the grading,. * plan for Lots 1, 2, and 3, for Fire Station No. 4 in t-8*-.'--.am0Unt of -:::9:1, 800.00. Egan moved, Wachter motion to authorize the preparation of the grading plan 15y.krthur Dickey & Associates. All voted yes. Upon recommendation of the staff, Egan moved, Ellison seconded the motion to schedule for bids for Fire Station No. 4 to be opened on Septe'ii*�i'�'**-"t':*::*,-*2':Ij.':;:::::.*j.,.'g-'�.?..:.-':.*-, ........ 2:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. All voted yea,:*--'%: HAZ ARDQUSX:q.A�_T�- .. -ECTION ...... ......... ......... Tom Hedges reported that the City has an opportunity to work jointly with Dakota County y and Unisys Corporation for a special household hazardous collection schedule for November 6 and 7, 1987 at the Unisys Defense Systems building on Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob Roads. The cost ...to the City would be between $2,000.00 to $5,000.00 and the staff rec:.i��e.pded approval. John Hohenstein was present and answered questf"C*�,��.:::b:f:::::.:..t;be City Council, indicating that paints, aerosol and pest ic ld.:.e:.:.s.*.**'."'-a'.:'.r'..j.�'.:*'.':'I:.ntended to be collected. The Councilmembers authorized procL'5':�ding.-`*�4j-t-b the pilot program and directed the staff to assist i'ft*::*:Set:t.:i,':ii'.'.::'.:'.:'.a'.'- the program. :CONSENT AGENDA The following consent agenda - items were submitted and recommended to be approved: 1. Proclafinatio'n./Constf.:t-L.I:f,::JO:r,.- City Council proclaimed September 17, 1987 as Cons 1E*1tUt**0'n the City of Eagan. 2. Personnel Items. It wa2:-::-::-:::`recoMm�?nded that Steven Baehr and Bob Goering be hired as season A**' -"1'L:' mairi-6,_4 nanc e workers in the Parks Department for the fall season. 3. 'Plumbers Licenses. A schedule of applications from six plumbing companies attached to the Council packet, was recommended to be approved. 4. Town Centre 70 and Town #519. A petition has been-......r..e,c the installation of street.'-':-J-'.*:i.4: 100 and it was recommended th*67` Council direct the authorization Centre of a 2 Street Lights - Project Federal Land Company for PgN41� Centre 70 and Town Centre 'Extion be received and the fe-&:.tibility report. Council Minutes September 1, 1987 5. Gophar Eagan Indu:: The feasibility Jreport :car Project utility improvements in Gopher -Eagan I was submitted and it was :.8coinmend ed: hearing be scheduled for (Nitb•r•_.;6:.r:::: Municipal Center. .. :2nd Addition - Project #516. 5.16 consisting of street and ustrial Park 2nd Addition to be received and a public 87 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan 6. Wescott School Addition - Final Plat. The application by School District #196 for final plat approval of Wescott School Addition was submitted. The staff recommended approval of the final plat, subject to compliance::w..th..all::::::ty. requirements. 7. Lone Oak 2nd Addition - the staff that the City Counci for Lone Oak 2nd Addition and au execute all related documen.s.;.._ )Final......:lat. It was recommended by approve the final plat application prize .he Mayor and City Clerk to 8. Digital Printer - Public Works Department - Surplus Property. It was a recommendation of the Public :Yorks Department that the digital printer originally purchased for the card control gas system, be declared surplus property to be made available for sale. Inver Grove Heights:•is interested in acquiring it and it was recommended that negotia.be authorized to sell the printer to Inver Grove Heights. Upon motion by Wachter, segonded' Egan, it was resolved that the foregoing Consent Agenda itoJns.;....:1 :::::;:approved as recommended. All members voted affirmatively. GREENSBORO FIRST ADDITION - PROJECT #470 - PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Bea Blomquist convened the public assessment hearing regarding Project -#470 consisting of street and utility improvements for Greensboro - First Adc�* �7*:4n�--*::::'." e;::were no appearances and Tom Colbert described the a 'sL!viii= n..s== ow-ering 38 parcels, to be assessed over 5 years at 8.5% :1-�teres-;:. Smith moved, Ellison seconded. the motion to close the :kiearii 4::, to approve the assessment roll and authorize the certification U::the County for collection. All members voted in favor. WOODLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - PERMIT City Administrator Tom Hedges annou&c:gid that Dr. Tom Wilson was present on behalf of ISD #196 and regapsted a building permit for Woodland Elementary School eca.ue.e..:o;f....the backlog of approximately 20 subdivision plats in th::fl::6::::c3:: Surveyor's office as of August 20, 1987, a delay ''Ii s='='''beeri ''='err Ountered and it is critical that construction of the school building::be commenced. There was no objection. Smith moved, Ellison secorrcad the motion to approve the request as submitted, subject to compliance with all City requirements. All voted yes. 3 Council Minutes S-iptember 1, 1987 WILDERNESS RUN ROAD - IMPROVEMENT PROJF•CT #345 - ASSESSMENT HEARING The public assessment eAr;y.nq .;::t carding Wilderness Run Road improvement Project #345''::;stt;t:::='improvements, scheduled for September 1, 1987 was then convened by the Mayor. It was recommended by the staff that the Council continue the public hearing until September 15, 1987 in order to complete negotiations with the affected property owners. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to continue the hear: r........ .p�:pmber 15, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Municipal Center. :::3:C7=::ice:::�vor . DANIEL DRIVE - PROJECT 4475 -: SSESSMENT HEARING The next assessment hea*$:tt: ::.,co:ftVr�n:e8 by Mayor Blomquist covered street and utility improvements on Daniel Drive under Project #475. It was recommended by the staff that there be a continuance, and upon motion by Egan, seconded Wachter, it was resolved that the hearing be continued to September 15, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall. All members voted ye.q. BLUEBERRY CIRCLE - PRO J''::$J;:;::.- ASSESSMENT HEARING .r After convening the public::'hregarding Blueberry Circle storm sewer improvements undo:::?:i*;�.j`2ct #481, Mr. Colbert explained the project. He briefly :;:r:�:1:etaed the agreement affecting the project and two affected: :'property owners were present with no objections. Egan moved,.Ellison seconded the motion to close the hearing and to approve the final roll and authorize the certification to the County for collection. All councilmembers voted yes. HOLLAND LAKEPR0JEC.-T #444R The public hearing regarding kl�e firl assessments for the trunk storm sewer for Holland Lake under"'Projeet #444R was next opened by the Mayor. Tom Colbert described the project in some detail and indicated that certain parcels had received large. lot credit. A resume' of the assessments proposed was presented and Martin DesLauriers appeared and filed objections to the assessments against his property. There were no other appd;�-�ances or objections. Egan then moved, Smith seconded the mot`aJ` to close the hearing, to approve the assessment roll: ,.and:::e.r.ta...:.;all assessments under the roll to Dakota County fore::::::A:�:.��'ti3:F:::::; with the exception of the DesLauriers parcel, which was''"str'fciceri''f'r'dm the roll; further, that the DesLauriers assessments be referred::.to the Assessment Committee and in the event that there is no resolO.Uon to the objections, that an appraiser be hired to determine benefits to the property. All voted in favor. 4 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 TRUNK WATER MAIN - PROJECT #404 The public hearing reg-0.*iA_q....p. ct #404 covering assessments for the trunk water main" * :::::u:a r:&*�3:' 013-76 along Lexington Avenue consisting of the Patrick MCCartli'y'"property next was convened by the Mayor. Patrick McCarthy was present but there were no objections. After explanation by Mr. Colbert, Egan moved, Ellison seconded the motion to close the hearing, to approve the assessment roll, providing for a reduction .©..;:.::.t.�;.;.as.sq-qsments from $6,551.26 to $1,084.00, subject to the t:: -:an appropriate agreement by October 1, 1987 and authorize:: the ceit.Xification to the County for collection. All members voted af_firmatiVely. TRUNK STORM SEWERASSESSMENT HEARING The next assessment hearing regarding property owned by Patrick McCarthy near Hurley Lake for trunk storm sewer purposes under Project #411 covering Parcel 011-04 was then convened by Mayor Bea Blomquist. Mr. Colbert explained that at the time of the final assessment hearing on Spt�ember 17, 1985, a written objection was submitted by the property,. the assessments and an appraisal was done with a benefit establi fi44::::4:t:::-:550,000.00 compared with the proposed $60,680.12 to be :::::asses�.'25.,.:. The Special Assessment Committee reviewed the its July 1987 meeting and recommended reduction to $50.,.0:O:Q:t'>''' Pat McCarthy appeared::•'- and stated that the catch basin was causing water to come into McCarthy Pond and Mr. Colbert explained that all ponds would equalize after heav-y rains. McCarthy asked the City to plug the outlet and to hold. the water on his property. After review of the' -assessment roll which had been -reviewed by the Council on September 17,; i; :$:5:.:.:�r��:.:i -b. : ssessment Committee in July of 1987, and upon the-request'''trf'''N---,i &C - Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to close :::the hearing and to approve the assessment roll and authorize :t:t to b;t: forwarded to Dakota County for spread on the tax rolls, b:�:fed upon the benefit received; further, that Findings and Coni usio :s:: be prepared covering the assessments which shall be attached to these minutes. All councilmembers voted in favor. TRUNK STORM SEWER - ELLERBE ARCR-1TECTS - PROJECT #428 The final assessment hgaring....co. Gerning Tract F, RLS No. 4, Parcel 019=00 owned by Elle:r:::A3::treat:., covering street and storm sewer improvements was ;2�d-*i* '=' A final assessment hearing was held on March 1, 1986 'at which time.•:::::pbjections were filed by Ellerbe. The Special Assessment Commitee reviewed the assessments at its July 1987 meeting and recommended that the property be 5 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 assessed at the total iiazit'' ='o t' 3:, 321.53 according to the assessment roll. There be £:fig no obj ec.0-i)ns , and Mr. Colbert stated that he understood the prop.sr.ty owner ,was now in agreement with the assessments, Wachter moved,;::-Qan seconA." the motion to close the hearing, to approve hessSa*0r:�' roll and to authorize certification to the County !-*Ction. All members voted yes. TRUNK STORM SEWER - PROJECT #443 - ROBERT O'NEIL PROPERTY The final assessment Ye:x::s�4n::ex;ning Project #443 covering the Robert O'Neil proper ty:::::::E'::r~:�mmendation, upon motion by Egan, seconded Smith, continued :::itil 1;a:ter in the Council meeting. All councilmembers voted yes. TRUNK WATER MAIN - PRC�'J'Et:T'':#4"� :�::::WILLARD BERFELZ PROPERTY The hearing regarding the Willard Berfelz property under Parcels 010-28 and 010-12 under Project #447 was then considered by the Council. The Council had reviewed the recommendation of the Special Assessment Committee and..._there was no appearance by Mr. Berfelz until later in the meeting;::::::::y?hen he appeared, he indicated he had no objection to the ass'e's -die::$.,,. Mr. Colbert reviewed the assessments and recommended .'ag:ctt:::::of the roll. Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to cli3i�e the'"he.a.ring, to approve the final assessment roll and authorize:::::: c,e.: : ::t1on to the Dakota County Auditor. All voted affirmativ''i=':=:':' HIDDEN VALLEY ADDITION - PROJECT #511 - SANITARY SEWER The public hearing regarding Project #511 consisting of sanitary sewer extension in- 't -he Hidden Valley Addition, east of Pilot Knob Road then came befb-re the :::::iri::::::r `its review. Mark Hanson described the proposal.,. inetu'c1rig''t-i'=s=sssments and the- necessary easements. No lateral assessm��:ts wo:old be proposed under the current project and the cost.Would ::::::be provided from the trunk sanitary sewer funds. There were::::: no ::*�pearances or objections. Smith moved, Ellison seconded the'*' m0ticifi to close the hearing, to order in the project and to authorize "the preparation of plans and specifications. All voted yes. BRITTANY 10TH ADDITION - PROJECT f:%3 - TRUNK WATER MAIN The public hearing regar.d.139..... 8.r.jttan.X 10th Addition trunk water main under Project #513a::ne�z:rd:::by the ' Mayor. Mark Hanson explained the project inclui'*i'rig'''-''=.�e'qu' 'i~ed easements that would be necessary to complete the project. He k-dicated that a water main running' easterly is intended to be coni:.:eructed because the 24 inch trunk on Cliff Road will be eliminatLdl"during the Pilot Knob Road 6 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 upgrading. He noted that no appearances and afte•' the motion to close the fie project to be installed and=? and specifications; further';; condemnation if necessary, damage. All Councilmembers c3*�iii.ii$-*i�-Ecri :: shay be required. There were iscussion; '4achter moved, Egan seconded ring, toapprove and authorize the irect the:::.Pteparation of detailed plans be directed to commence :;:::::::L hire an appraiser to determine voted yes. FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT A letter was received David Sellergren on behalf of the developer of the Fal:r:way #f7::lls Addition requesting a preliminary plat extension for Fairway *f.i lls 2nd Addition. Based upon the background of the requ st:, E:g :n moved, Smith seconded the motion to approve the re..qu.e.s:t ::i*6r.;.e.:�:t;ension for one year from the date of expiration. All vgj; es =` JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The application of Good. Value Homes for Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition next came befo**:::.:.:.t,ha City Council. Tom Hedges and Dale Runkle explained the bac kgro:itt:t:::::o:t.ing that a Court Order had been entered in the District Court "reit:??g. the City Council to approve the application and Larry Jd4nson, "At.t. rney for the applicant, was present. Mr. Hedges indicated::::that.:.ori:L:::neighboring owner called and had a question concerning the...::s:t:tU15?-,*of the preliminary plat. Mayor Blomquist was concerned abd:ti :=:�l�'e:.:soil condition and Mr. Johnson indicated that soil tests vr'il be taken and that corrective measures will be implemented. Smith moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the application with the followi-ng conditions: 1. This development shall use existing services for sanitary sewer and water to the.. & e:::::lots. The only new service .............i?...... that will be allowed will ice to Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1, and Lots 3 and 4 of Bloc*k-: 3. 2. The vacation of the neces:*;dry d::mage and utility easements over Outlot B for proposed Blocks"'''1,:::; and 3 of the 5th Addition shall occur prior to final plat approvai* 3. All costs associated with completing this development shall b2 the sols responsibility of this development. 4. All standard City of Eagan play;'::conditions shall be adhered to. 5. A detailed landsciijie:::::-:— ''='` iall be submitted and the financial guarantee shall' not be releas:i,-.d until after one year from time of -installation. 7 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 6. The plat shall :::?ttij`ct::.ao the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission revip.v and dedicahKon requirements. 7. The chief building::::::•inspector•:::::::::shall review and approve the soil samples at the time t::::kn..s©iz of the grading plan to make sure the plan conforms with app:a:e building requirements. All members voted yes. HOLIDAY STATION.:STORES::-.:•Q2•TIONAL USE PERMIT A request was submitted by :)Ovid ::nbeschen of the real estate department for Holiday Statiori'. Stores, asking that the Council reconsider the requirement for se:&1ce.1::&ys in its conditional use permit for the station a.;::ol:;s::.:.i?i Cliff Road. A Holiday representative was preseti: �::�i'i'd rtet:t:�-oned that Holiday may include the service bays but would prefer no.t.-to do so. City Attorney Paul Hauge explained the motion that was brought by Tom Thumb regarding Yankee Square and Cedar Cliff Shopping Center gas pump applications, and the staff asked direction from the City Council regarding the requirement for service bays with the issuance of gas pumps. After discussion, Wacht'ex:Yie::::::::i�i �v.eid, Egan seconded the motion to authorize the removal of t:ij.rement of the conditional use permit for Holiday regarding s rv1ce"f�a :�rs. All members voted yes. JAMES De1GRECO - E` GR tN PARK ADDITION - VARIANCE The application of James DelGreco for variance for 1 foot side yard setback for Lot 6, Block 1, Evergreen Park Addition came to the City Council. Mr. Runkle indicated that the request was for 14 feet rather than 1 f-o-ot and recommended a continuance. Egan moved, Ellison seconded the motion::=fl:::rii::.tie' request until the next regular meeting for further'=Y*Llli"='�ta::.':.:.:: 1:I: -voted in favor. - ROBERT O'NEIL PROPERTY - TR,03**K STORM SEWER - PROJECT #443 The reconvened public hearing regarding Project #443 consisting of 'trunk storm sewer improvements over the Robert O'Neil property consisting of parcels 010-77 and 010-56 was then convened by Mayor Blomquist. City Attorney Paul Hauge introduced the project and indicated that Public Works Director TC7it:: Colbert and Mark Parranto, the appraiser for the City, would be test-*fying on behalf of the City. He asked whether there :::.:was ..... ny.Q.ne present on behalf of the O'Neils, -and there were '::::;ri :::::`:: :a:: iJ.�!s. It was noted that the Special Assessment Commit't''*�'-'-'-,-'Ifi'' -• July of 1987 reviewed the assessments and at that time, Mr. anz :Mrs. O'Neil_, attorney Jerry Duffy and John Klein were present. A rj�:0)mmendation was made by the Assessment Committee to the City Council -""that the roll be adopted as proposed. 0 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 Mark Parranto was intr:&Tuced and reviewed an appraisal that he had done covering the -property dated January 29, 1987. He reviewed the value of properr:;:: before the assessments, indicating $2,674,000.001 ati::::the_..:v:t after of $2,842,000.00 for an increase in value ofThe proposed amount of the assessments was approximately $15'8,000.00 and, according to his opinion, after having reviewed comparables to the property, that the increase in value did equate or was greater than the proposed assessments. Mr. Colbert reviewed the project in some detail, indicating that the storm:r.cr:•:•:::npt:4?:eents had been installed, including the use of twoc:s property. Councilman Smith questioned the increase Mr. Hauge recommended that he:�:ing be closed but that the owner and the City beal:ordn,.:.s:tkSiit any further information, including Findings and Con:to'ns ::i:'the Council then consider the approval of the roll at its regular 'September 15, 1987 meeting. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to implement the recommendation and to close the hearing and adopt the assessment roll at the regular September 15, 1987 meeting. All councilmembers voted in favor. LAKE PARK CIRCLERRANTO - VARIANCE The application of Steven ::.P r.: rt r :: for variance for a 15 foot side yard setback at 1478 came to the Council for its consideration. The lot:;:;Ais=isted of Lot 8, Block 1, Thomas Lake Addition. The request was.'to allow construction of a 76 foot wide, two-story home on an odd -shaped lot. Mark Parranto appeared as did Steve Parranto, indicating that the hardship was based upon the 60 foot cul-de-sac radius and noted that the house would conform with other houses in the --subdivision with the kitchen, the only.portion that requires the 'varianc�.':. :�:��v:;�.*:.i?: arito explained that he tried five house designs on -the cr't' aM:::iicioned that there were no objections from the neighbor ink:::. owneX:8. Ellison moved, Smith seconded. the motion, noting tY the:::PYoposed home was of a large residential variety and that it al -:to wat:-at the end of a cul-de-sac, thereby justifying the hardship aria the::::::application was approved. All members voted yes, except Wachter who voted -no. CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION - ZACHMAN HOMES - WAIVER OF PLAT An application was submitted by X.-Xchman Brothers Construction for waiver of plat for Ridge 6th Addition consisting of a duplex lot. Yi:r::t:e::::::;no appearances. Ellison moved, Wachter seconded the'''iifiori'' :f�''`��prove the application, with the understanding that all City requ$-pements will be complied with and the -following: D Council Minutes September 1, 1987 1. That the proper f :Y:Y: = t ' "'0u City requirements for thl:? storm sew River Hills 9th Addition and•.the Cinna All voted yes. be completed according to onding that exists between Ridge Addition. METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION — SPECIAL PERMIT An application of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission to expand the existing sewage ;� :i;3-i;3south of Highway #55 on the Veronica McClean prd. -t . .... 'considered by the Council. The Commission plans to expa ick:::the z;ft station on Lot 5, Robert O'Neil Homestead, and to purchase::a 120 , :oot by 120 foot parcel of land for the expansion of the :i�stiniift station. The question was whether a regional :.:tr:::::us::is appropriate for light industrial area and the q0a:�;6�r* of:::pt` for land recording purposes would be required. Dale Runkle described the request and noted that the Commission was having difficulty with acquiring access to the parcel across the McKee property. Representatives of the Commission were present and there were no objections. Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to appove the special permit requested by the MWCC. All voted yea. PINECREST OF EAGAN A¢DITIO4':"--.:.,9-TREET NAME CHANGE A request was made for st.z,-*e:e:t::::::::game change in Pinecrest of Eagan Addition, noting that Cres: tic3<j-e Court was already used, and it was recommended that Pinecrest court be substituted. Ellison moved, Wachter seconded the motion, to approve the change from Crestridge Court to Pinecrest Court in the final plat documents of Pinecrest of Eagan Addition. All.voted yes. HILLS OF .STO1$'irD'OE"='- :P1DLf, HOME PERMITS An application was submitted :::by Un$t�d Mortgage Corporation for approval of 12 model home perm"-i:ts fo ::::Hills of Stonebridge. Ron Helmer appeared on behalf of United' Mortgage Corporation and it was noted the final plat process has not been completed. The normal requirement is that the homes could not be sold or occupied before final plat approval. Noting the variance from the normal City procedure, Egan moved, Ellison seconded the motion to grant approval of permits for up to 12 model homes;:::. -::but that no more than the identical number approval for Bridle Rj;�:ge Addition be approved for Hills of Stonebridge. All vo.t.ed.._ye.S.Y.,......:except Wachter who voted against. 10 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 ELRENE ROAD & BRAD00C-*K-:':TRAii ::�: CONTRACT #87-25 Plans for Contract #87-25- consisting. of street improvements for Elrene Road and Braddock : •ail were j.C:esented. It was recommended that the plans be approved' :::end...-tka::::::::'the Council authorize the advertisement for bids to f3::::::::4?eCl'' at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, October 1, 1987 at the City''�'�Mui nicipal Center. Mr. Colbert recommended approval but that the Council will reconsider the MSA Funding prior to the award. Smith moved, Wachter seconded the motion to implement the recommendation of the staff to schedule the bid opening. All voted in ap:r.:.:;.:...... BRITTANY 10TH ADDITION - CONTRACT #87-35 Upon motion by it was resolved that the plans for Contract .. ... :5` cbFis : Ping of trunk storm sewer and watermain for Brittany 10th Addition be approved and that the Council authorize the advertisement for bids to be opened on October 1, 1987 at 10:30 a.m. at the City Municipal Center. All members voted in favor. WHISPERING WOODSfV &::::B::`APPTTION - CONTRACT #87-36 Mr. .Colbert indicated that: Ken 'App;lebaum was not willing to grant the easement across pr.gpe .t '& ;Cent c :cent to R & B Addition, but recommended that the Council::p eek*: *With the plans. Upon motion by Egan, seconded Wachter, it �;4*a:S: -*:r 'solved that the plans for Contract #87-36 covering storm sewer=''*`improvements be approved, and that the Clerk be authorized to advertise for bids to be opened at 11:30 a.m. at the Municipal Center on October 1, 1937. All voted yea. TOWERVIEW ROAD &::fit: i CONTRACT #$6-4 E 1::::A N E` - Egan moved, Ellison seconded ::-;he gq:tion to authorize the final payment -and formal acceptance of :: owerT`.XP_w Road and Highview Avenue for utility and street improvemen:tz and& :Contract #86-4. All voted yes. GREENSBORO. ADDITION - CONTRACT #86-14 Upon motion by Ellison, seconded Sml't]�, it was resolved that the City Council authorize the final payme# and formal acceptance for perpetual maintenance of-,M f,,.....Lnd... utilities for Greensboro Addition provided by Conti - of Compliance submitted by 'Bnries't'rzin-i.."Ito•stne, Anderlik & Assoc. All' members voted positively. 11 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 BRITTANY 9Tji-:::ADDITION - CONTRACT #86-4 Wachter moved, Egan sea-.gtided the -'ifi:btion to authorize the final payment and the acceptance'maintenance of the streets P and utilities in Brittany qt----..-.:.:.-.-.--- under Contract #86-4 awarded affirmatively. by the City. All councilmembers—, EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK a UPS 1ST ADDITION - CONTRACT #86-10 A Certificate of Corti :!-a Z*X'aWi --*.-"::::'*".. .... City approved plans and specifications had been submitte.':by th§i::::consulting engineers and it was recommended that the final p4X.ment b.e:approved for Contract #36- 10 and that the City accept for perpetual maintenance. Egan moved, Wachter motion to implement the recommendation of the staf:6*�:'::.:.*-.k-T! favor. 1987 SEAL COAT - CHANGE ORDER #1 - CONTRACT #87-8 A proposed Change Order... No. 1 to Contract #87-8 covering 1987 sealcoating improvements, motion by Egan, seconded Wachter, approved in the amount8 6 6. 2 8 and authorized payment to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Al l.. vo .: e i M. except Councilman Wachter who voted no, indicating tha:�-*-.' the "C'.h-a-nqe Order should have been approved at an earlier t im.d.'—..a have been a part of the street reconstruction impr 0 PARKCLIFF STORM SEWER - CONTRACT #87-37 The plans for Parkcliff storm motion by Wachter ,-'8econded Egan, X specifications for theI-: #87-37 in- Parkcliff Add itDon'**':':15e"":-: authorized to advertise for bids on Thursday, October 1, 1987 at t a.m. All members voted yea. sewer have been submitted and upon it was resolved that the plans and mprovements under Contract and that the City Clerk be K. the :.3:.'�gal newspaper to be opened �:City-.:.Municipal Center at 11:00 -X GREENSBORO 2ND ADDITION - CONTRACT #87-11 Councilman Smith moved, Councilman Ellison seconded the motion to approve Change Order No. 1 to Contra6:h:-*.'#87-11 covering street and utility improvements in Greensboro 2nd,...' dition. All members voted yes. 12 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 PARKS IM Change Order No. 1 to. -Parks I submitted covering Quarry:i.:.:.. Carnel is Parks. Mr. Hedges reviewed''*:. #Ie;;.pzo.pa seconded the motion to approV*::Xha't in the amount of $18, 015. 00- -%%'0 th detailed information will be submitted the Change Order at a later time. All GOPHER SMELTING #87-2 mpr.ovement Contract #87-2 was and Blue Cross/Blue Shield k1' and Wachter moved, Egan =Order No. 1 to Contract #87-2 the understanding that further to the City Council covering members voted aye. RMIT - EX -12-167 A permit application was rec6ived ''from Gopher Smelting Company for the grading of approxima.t y 401: acres lying east of the Eagandale Center Industrial;:P;a:`ai:.;n�rth of Yankee Doodle Road. The proposed grading entai.=i-er;c3'ing of a ponding area, Pond EP -2 and grading for the construction" of future roadways. Mr. Ernie Peacock was present on behalf of Borchert -Ingersoll and Mr. Runkle explained the need to acquire access to the parcel just south of Borchert -Ingersoll and on the west side of Pond EP -2. Mr. Peacock requested the City provide access to the parcel on the west side, noting that it was landlocki�4-j..and the logical access would -be to the south, across Gopher ttt 1 . ri .::..:.property, or to the west. No access was available, according"tb••::i'4:z.::.::Peacock, and Councilman Smith questioned whether the City::. -::paid f t::.:.size ponding easement in that location for Borchert-Ingersol:l:. - .:,. ;-.:.;;::::;#?eacock noted that Barrel Reconditioning is interested,.::.:i=ig' the 17 acres. Wachter moved, Egad-" seconded the motion to continue consideration of the request for the grading permit until September 15, 1987 regular meeting, because no plan had been submitted, and there is need to acquire access for the Borchert -Ingersoll property. All members voted -yea. • t = a GOPHER SMELTING ASSE;%,�%NENT$::= PROJECT #447 Upon motion by Smith, second Fa Eg4;h-:-, it was resolved that the public hearing covering spec iaY"' assments under Project #447 regarding Gopher Smelting Company property be continued to September 15,`1987 at 7:00 p.m. All voted aye. PATRICK ADDITION - BUII#JING PERMIT A request was submitted ,y,.,.,._Mz�C.,.:a ranto for a building permit prior to final platting:::iQ.::::.:::ti#c 1, Patrick Addition. The City Council adopted a pol'zc'y='=' 'tati'e''eby '' building permits are not issued prior to final plat applicati«o: and authorization and the only ekception is for model 'homes. Parranto was present and stated that grading is complete and the*:"!.bt is sold, and the request 13 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 could be considered the mo:::oi: :rgist. After discussion, Egan moved, Ellison seconded t�:e motion to:pprove the request for model home permit, noting the haeffship to proceed with the construction. All voted in favor e x c e p a c h t e r W��' voted against, noting the serious staff backlog. POLICE DEPARTMENT — DRUG ENFORCEMENT GRANT APPLICATION Police Chief Berthe and Captain Geagan were present to discuss with the City Council, .a::;:.d.r.e.felement grant application. Captain Geagan indicated tY .� r, .P.O �a:� was for 25% participation by the City and 75% by the Federal:::::govetXtent. He explained some of the drug problems within the City;:. incliic7''ing arrests recently at the Bulk Mail Center. Five maj.X.; Eag;8*;i felony cases are pending concerning drug dealers. He further noted that 'e' Minnesota Narcotics Commission will distribute $3,000,000.00 and applications are being submitted at the present time for participation. A Joint Powers Agreement with the South Metro Task Force covering nine units of government with up to $15,000.00 payable by the City, was discussed. Egan questioned why Burnsville was making tYt ::::;:::app1ication and it was indicated that Burnsville was the most app't0-pr.pj;ate..:City to do so at that time. There were also questions about" se�:::::::at .e.ut in charge and whether the Board will actually incur �xpens s..' ..and make decisions on the expenses. Wachter moved, Egan sec :nftd::::':' the motion to approve the request for the application and :bshtry into the Joint Powers Agreement because of the importance of drug control in the area. All members voted yes. COMPREH3.to :x_ENT Dale Runkle described the app:r-:Dval :::•fay the Metropolitan Council for the Eagan Comprehensive P1 :: Amer�i�rpent of 1987 but noted that the provisional and conditional uai: wick n the noise corridor had been voluntarily sent through the *'* Metrc:*iolitan Council. Also, the Metro Council representative claimed ...that t -he CPD District is a change and could impact the metro systems. The City's position is that they create no effective change because of the 8 CPD changes. There had been no resolution regarding that issue at that time. In addition, there had been considerable. --discussion concerning the airport section. 14 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 COMMUN K GRANTS Mr. Runkle stated that..Dakota County.Commissioner John Voss, has recommended that County spot ;.ored day-.---Qire facilities be considered for low to moderate in�com*i�.*.'.'.'�.4Ri.;'-.l..*LO:$"***'*'***** allow single parents to get y- is being proposed and into the work force. Count Apple Valley, Burnsville and Ea*i*§aiih' under the Community Development Block Grant are being requested to consider their involvement. SPERRY - WAT Formal bids have been rec refinishing the Sperry water res recommended that the bid of Ra be approved and the contra(zt-be:-:: moved, Wachter seconded All voted yes. NTRACT #87-34 . V e d c*;:' r repairing, cleaning and voir off August 31, 1987 and it was bow, ;c. in the sum of $72,441.50 the low bidder. Egan approve the recommendation. CRAY RESEARCH, INC. - VACATION It was requested by Ct%Research, Inc. that the City Council receive the petition to Xte.:... utility easement for Lone Oak Addition andschedulea pu bli t�-X:z1*i!:::--on October 6, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal CEii�-ter.%:1H . iison moved, Wachter seconded the motion to accept the reque:§t a public hearing on October 6, 1987. All council affirmatively. EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK - CONTRACT #87-18 The bids have now been received for Eagandale Center Industrial Park street impr-ovements * under City Contract #87-18 and it was recommended thatthe contr'St'i�.a--*:.,:4-9:-:.*iA:-Xto*-'�,--- -' the lowest responsible bidder, Valley Paving,-- Inc'*.**-*-*i-it'-*-t-�f-Lit:-:-'s*'**u-'i�::::&f $151,267.59. Smith moved, Egan seconded the motion to appi:fve tb:o contract award to Valley Paving, Inc. All voted in favor.::::::::::: CEDAR CLIFF GALLERIA The City Administrator stated that the Advisory Planning Commission had delayed consideration of the Cedar Cliff Galleria project until its regular September 198-7:.:.:ineeting. He mentioned that the City traffic consultant had reco�"nded that 14 issues be reviewed in the traffic• the cost would not exceed $5,500.00. He asked whethe'::*:r*::.::':.'t':.h�.:e.:.:::.:.C..-i,:t'.y,-::-::C.'-O-u.ncil would order the study. There was discussion concee*'n":I*i*f*'g**":"-"'*t".'h.:.�'i:.'.;�...6...�..�'.*'t.:.i:.bility of continuance until the October Planning Commission mee-t:kng to properly complete the traffic study and cover all other issue'.s.,.:heeded for complete review 15 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 by the Planning Commission;;:::; Egan seconded the motion to authorize the preparati6i*: of the tra"*' $%�j�ortation study as proposed and request the developer tp. r-eimburse.:-t-_h_,-e City for the cost; in the event that the developer re-5es to do-::::i��, that the study would then be terminated All members'*::*- or. CONTRACT SNOW REMOVAL - 1987-88 Tom Colbert recommended that the Council advertise for bids for main line snow removaland one cul-de-sac for .. the 1937-88 as recommended .................. Ugh Tested that there be an . option for bids to be based on :::::two QE -:three year contract. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to: authorize the advertisement for bids to include options covei::�pig 2,�ill� 3 years, which bids will be received on September 2%.: ..... . .... 0 0 a at City Hall. All members voted yea. SERVICE ORGANIZATION MEMBERSHIPS A policy was prepared membership by City Departit . A member of each department by City Administrator Tom Hedges for t -:....beads in local service organizations. one service organization for *wh-! - 6 department head for all m e6'%",1 i n q expenses incurred as a meml>t-r, responsibility of the employQe;:.-*-*--*:-':::::::: .X...... ' motion to approve the poli(�:* "-.:,5 -3-:s"u -b All voted aye. ity is encouraged to belong to e City would reimburse the te'l ' a.t;*d expenses and that social club would be the j*6-ft moved, Wachter seconded the itted by the City Administrator. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING Upon motion by, Egan, %e:q*6j6i!�"a.:.-:*:.-*:* ... )it:i� t-, it was resolved that a ... ... ....... special City Council meetxff9%,- for Tuesday, September 8, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. to include revi;:;4r:of Gh* 1988 Budget. All members voted yea. THOMAS LAKE PARK PARKING LOT PROSECT #87-1 Mr. Colbert indicated that soil borings discovered soil problems in the Thomas Lake Park parking lotunder Project #87-1 and recommended a Change Order No. 1 .. the sum of $21,307.56 for Central Landscaping, Inc. Egan moved, AT hter seconded the motion to approve Change Order No. in favor. OPEN HOUSE:.:::::::: There will be an open house for tM .*.'City Maintenance Garage on September 17, 1987 from 4:30 to 7:30 p.m. 16 Council Minutes September 1, 1987 -CHECKLIST Egan moved, Wachter sec�ric��d.-the•:•:tib:Eion to approve the following checklist dated September 1,::::-: 5::: ti:;:: fie amount of $841,968.80. All voted affirmatively. EXECUTIVE SESSION City Attorney Paul Hain:e::: : ss_ :::::::::vaith the City Council, the progress of the action entitied*•°C':'Neil;: Vis. City of Eagan" including the status of freeway zoning and the tr•fnsportation study. Upon motion duly made 'and seconded, the meeting adjourned at 11:35 p.m. PHH r 17