07/17/1990 - City Council RegularAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
JULY 17, 1990
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE)
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE)
A. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
p 1. Review Drainage Concern (Lot 20, Block 1, Blackhawk Glen 1st Addition)
1 IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK)
�•� A. PERSONNEL ITEMS
B. LICENSES, Plumbers
C. RESOLUTION Authorizing the Submission of the City's Legal Fees Regarding McCarthy
Lawsuit to LMCIT for Reimbursement
010 D. DEFERMENT, Senior Citizen Special Assessment
1,.0 E. DECLARE Surplus Property/Advertise for Bids, 1986 Snowmobile, Police Department
.17, F. FINAL PLAT, Summer Place Second Addition
14G. CONTRACT 90-02, Change Order #1 (Park Shelter E,xilding Construction)
11H. CONTRACT 89-07, Acknowledge Completion/Authorize Final Payment (Well #14)
�P;,'7I. CONTRACT 89-08, Change Order #2 (Wells #14 & #15, Pumping Facilities)
p,18 J. PROJECT 88-U, Acknowledge Completion/Acceptance of City Maintenance (Michael Sill
U p Addition)
P.1D K. PROJECT 586, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (South Oaks -
Streetlights)
L. PROJECT 575, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (James Street and
Court - Streetlights)
M. CONTRACT 88-26, Acknowledge Completion/Authorize Final Payment (Daniel Drive - Streets
and Utilities)
p y0 N. PROJECT 88-J, Acknowledge Completion/Accept for City Maintenance (Deerwood Addition -
Streets and Utilities)
r;b 0. PROJECT 88 -II, Acknowledge Completion/Accept for City Maintenance (Woodlands Addition
-Streets and Utilities)
CONTRACT 90-09, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (West Publishing 3rd
9 & Wilmus Addition - Trunk Storm Sewer)
P. AMENDMENT, Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 10. 20, Shade Tree Control and Prevention; and
10.21, Planting and Maintenance of Trees and Grass on Private Property
V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON)
Q
.,A. REVISED Fee Schedule, Beer, Wine and Liquor Licensing and Regulation
1 N B. PROJECT 594, Water Quality Pond JP -67
+(QOC. PROJECT 596, Woodlands North Addition - Streets & Utilities
PD. PROJECT 597, Hills of Stonebridge 3rd Addition - Trunk Storm Sewer
PROJECT 589, Elrene Road and Kost Road - Streets and Utilities
W
VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID)
(41A: REZONING, Diffley Cedar Planned Development, Koldt Properties, to Amend the Splashland
�� PD to Allow a Mixed Use Multi -Family Residential and Retail Development and a
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT for Specification of Development within an Existing
CPD Designation of Approximately 41 Acres Located in the Northwest Corner of the
Intersection of Hwy 77 and Diffley Rd in the SW 1/4 of Section 19
VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN)
,2,03A. AMENDMENT, City Code Chapter 10, Section 10.51, Residential Off -Street Parking
C B. RESOLUTION, Collaborative Airport Planning
f�� C. LICENSE, Off -Sale Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License, Duckwood 66 Service Station,
l- �1(3 SERVICE STATION LICENSE, and CIGARETTE LICENSE, Located at 3575 Pilot Knob Road
,&/D. RESOLUTION Providing for the Issuance of a Temporary Note
SPECIAL USE PERMIT, Woodland Elementary School, to Allow Continuation of Portable
Classrooms at Woodland Elementary School
F�3!E.
�yyjF. VARIANCES, Al Herrmann Construction, 20' Setback Variances on Lot 1, Block 2, Fairway • Hills Addition Along Cliff Road, Lot 1, Block 5, Fairway Hills 2nd Addition, and Lot
4, Block 1, of Proposed Fairway Hills 4th Addition Along Pilot Knob Road in the NW
1/4 of Sec 34
REZONING, Trinity Lone Oak Church Addition, of Approximately 9.95 Ag (Agricultural)
R-4 (Multiple) and GB (General=Business) Acres to a PF (Public Facilities) District
and a PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting of One Lot and a Cemetery Located on the East Side
of State Highway 149 North of Lone Oak Road in the SW 1/4 of Sec 1 and the SE 1/4 of
2�r Sec 2
PRELIMINARY PLAT, Coventry Pass 3rd Addition/United Mortgage Corporation, Consisting
�I of 50 Lots on Approximately 19.8 Previously Zoned R-1 (Single -Family) Acres East of
Dodd Road in the E 1/2 of Sec 24
I. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Galaxie Cliff Plaza 2nd Addition/Galaxie Cliff Plaza Partnership,
Consisting of 7.59 Acres with on Lot and an Outlot for a Medical Clinic Located West
of Plaza Drive in the NW 1/4 of Sec 32
J. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, City of Eagan, Area D, Multifamily Residential
y7 Land Study, to Change the Land Use Designation of Approximately 9 Acres from D -III
11 Mixed Residential (6-12 Units Per Acre) to D -I Single Family Residential (0-3 Units
Per Acre) and a REZONING of Approximately 9 Acres from R-3 Townhouse Residential to
R-1 Single Family Residential. Property Located West of I -35E and South of Lemay
Lake in the NW and SW 1/4's of Sec 10 (Request to Continue to August 7, 1990, Regular
City Council Meeting)
K. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, City of Eagan, Area I, Multifamily Residential
Land Study, to Change the Land Use Designation of Approximately 16 Acres from D -III
Mixed Residential (6-12 Units Per Acre) to D -I Single Family Residential (0-3 Units
Per Acre) and a REZONING of Approximately 16 Acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 Single
Family Residential. Property Located on West Side of Federal Drive Along Violet Lane
in the NE 1/4 of Sec 16
3\3L. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, City.of Eagan, Area J, Multifamily Residential
Land Study, to Change the Land Use Designation of Approximately 7.5 Acres from D -III
Mixed Residential (6-12 Units Per Acre) to LB (Limited Business) and a REZONING of
Approximately 7.5 Acres from A (Agricultural) to LB (Limited Business). Property
Located on the South Side of Yankee Doodle Road East of Coachman Road in nthe NW 1/4
of Sec 16
M. REZONING, City of Eagan, Area L, Multifamily Residential Land Study, of Approximately
29 Acres from R-4 Multiple Residential to I-1 (Industrial). Property Located on the
West Side of Kennebec Drive and Silver Bell Road in the SE 1/4 of Sec 18
VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD)
IR. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN)
R. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
RI. ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CTTY COUNCILIEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JULY 13, 1990
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR JULY 17, 1990 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
The minutes for the July 10, 1990 regular City Council meeting are in the process of
transcription and if they are ready they will be included with the Administrative packet on
Monday. After approval is given to the July 17, 1990 City Council agenda the following
items are in order for consideration:
A. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1. Review Drainage Concern (Lot 20, Block 1, Blackhawk Glen 1st Addition - Lynn
Lewis) --Enclosed on pages �? _ and .3 is a letter the City received from the above -
referenced property owner expressing concerns pertaining to. the drainage associated with
the recent development of the Stoney Pointe Add'tion adjacent to and east of the above -
referenced property. Also enclosed on page is a composite grading and drainage
map of the general area in question which was previously reviewed and discussed with the
City Council at the June 19 Council meeting. Staff's review of these concerns and a
response will be provided with the Administrative Packet.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide appropriate direction
regarding a response to these drainage concerns.
1568 Ashbury Place
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
June 13, 1990
Thomas Egan, Mayor
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55123
Dear Mayor Egan:
My husband and I live at 1568 Ashbury Place in Blackhawk Glen First Addition.
A problem with erosion and drainage has resulted from the development of Stony
Point Second Addition that is of concern to us and our neighbors in Blackhawk
Glen. With the heavy rains that occurred in late April, more recently on June
2, and most recently on June 12 and 13, a great deal of erosion occurred from
a house under construction at 1566 Lakeview Curve in Stony Point. As you can
see by the enclosed photographs (taken during the June 2 event), the amount of
soil lost from the property was substantial and at times has resulted in
damage to adjacent property owners' lawns. Other property owners in Blackhawk
Glen have also had problems with erosion and run off from other lots in Stony
Point. Needless to say, such carelessness with our precious soil resources
also leads to increased public works expenses when storm sewers clog and
retention ponds fill prematurely. The City should do a better job of
controlling erosion from the many building sites in Eagan.
I spoke with the City Engineer, Craig Knutson, on June 4 and explained the
problem to him. In a subsequent conversation with Mr. Knutson on June 6, he
assured me that he had spoken with the builder, M.T. Edgell, and that erosion
control measures would be taken at 1566 Lakeview Curve.
As a result of the June 12 rain, it became obvious that the builder either
took no precautions to prevent erosion or mitigated the problem in a very
ineffective manner. My husband contacted Mr. Edgell last night to let him
know that the erosion was continuing and to ask him what erosion -control
measures had been taken. Mr. Edgell said he was aware of the problem, but
would not explain what measures he had instituted. We informed him that we
would be contacting you. Unfortunately, even if erosion -control measures are
implemented, it is likely that trees in a buffer area between Ashbury Place
and Lakeview Curve will die as a result of sediment around their bases.
More importantly, this recent erosion situation has pointed out to us that a
much larger problem exists for the residents of 1556 through 1572 Ashbury
Place. Our backyards were designed to carry run off from these houses, not
from an additional number of houses on Lakeview Curve. In developing Stony
Point, the original topography of the area was changed significantly, along
with drainage patterns of that area and on our properties. When I pointed
this out to Mr. Knutson, he said it was "only drainage from backyards." While
it may be "only drainage from backyards," it adds up to a substantial volume
of water passing through our backyards - a volume they were not designed to
handle.
9
We are particularly concerned that our yards would not be able to handle rapid
snow melt, especially if combined with ice dams at the lower end of the
drainage and/or a rainstorm.
To resolve this problem before we have water damage and additional erosion
damage to our properties, I request that you and a representative of the City
come out to view the situation and then work with us, our neighbors, and the
developer and builders in Stony Point to devise a better stormwater run off
plan for Lakeview Curve. This would be in keeping with Eagan's new policy to
retain as much stormwater on site (e.g., within a development) as possible.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. I would like my
photographs returned after you have shared them with the City Council and Mr.
Knutson. I can be reached during the day at 725-3536 or in the evening at
688-8804 to arrange a site visit.
Sincerely,
Lynn M. Lewis
■
Enclosures
cc City Council members (w/o encl.)
Craig Knutson (w/o encl.)
Meritor Development Corporation (w/o encl.)
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
There are seventeen (17) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one
(1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in
further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under
Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
A. PERSONNEL ITEMS:
Item 1. Flex Spending Plan/Police Officers and Investigators At this time, it would be
appropriate for the Council to take official action approving the inclusion of members of
the Police Officer/Investigator collective bargaining unit in the City's flex spending account
program.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the inclusion of members
of the Police Officers/Investigators collective bargaining unit in the City of Eagan's flexible
spending account plan which will become effective July 29, 1990.
PLUMBERS LICENSES
B. Plumbers licenses—Cit} Code regulatio s require that plumbers licenses be renewed
on an annual basis. Enclosed on page are those companies that are performing
plumbing ser%ices in the City of Eagan whose license application is in order for
consideration at this Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plumbers licenses
as presented.
s
July 11, 1990 PLUMBERS LICENSE
1. All-American Mechanical
2. Lamere Plumbing
3. Roberts Plumbing Inc.
0
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
RESOLUTIOMUBMISSION OF LEGAL FEES TO LMCIT
MCCARTHY V. EAGAN
C. Resolution Authorizing Submission of the City's Legal Fees Regarding McCarthy
Lawsuit to LIVICIT for Reimbursement—The City of Eagan recently settled the McCarthy
lawsuit. Under provisions made with the League of Minnesota Cities insurance trust, the
City is titled to reimbursement to its legal expenses related to this case. Enclosed on
pages through —�— is a copy of a resolution authorizing the submission of legal fees
related to this case to LMCIT at this time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the resolution
authorizing submission of the City's legal fees regarding the McCarthy lawsuit to LMCIT
for reimbursement.
CITY OF EAGAN
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has been named as a defendant in the
lawsuit titled The Estate of Dennis McCarthy,et al. Plaintiffs v.
City of Eagan, Defendant, District Court, First Judicial District,
Court File No. 88-01-7829; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has tendered the defense of the
lawsuit to the League of Municipal Cities Insurance Trust pursuant to
the insurance policies the City has with the League; and
WHEREAS, to the extent of the insurance coverage, the League has
agreed to defend the City subject to reservation of rights; and
WHEREAS, this matter has recently been settled between the
parties by a Settlement Agreement executed May 17, 1990; and
WHEREAS, to date the City has incurred legal fees in connection
with the defense of the lawsuit; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks reimbursement from the League of
Municipal Cities Insurance Trust with respect to the fees incurred in
the defense of this matter.
NOW, THEREFORE, upon motion duly made and seconded, the City
Council does resolve that:
1. That any legal bills for attorneys fees in connection with the
defense of the McCarthy lawsuit be forwarded on to the League of
Municipal Cities by the City Finance Director for reimbursement.
L
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan this day of
June, 1990.
ATTEST:
By: E. J. VanOverbeke
Its: City Clerk
CITY OF EAGAN
By: Thomas A. Egan
Its: Mayor
i1
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
DEFERMENT ENIOR CITIZEN SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
D. Deferment of Senior Citizen Special Assessment—Enclosed on page I ( you wi
a copy of an application received of Erik and Shirley Erikstrup, requesting deferm
assessments related to Project 466 for parcel #10-02800-010-80. The property is lc
at 4575 Pilot Knob Road. Also enclosed without page number is support inforr
concerning this application.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS TI'EM: To approve or deny the
citizen deferment for special assessments for Erik and Shirley Erikstrup for parcel
02800-010-80 as presented.
`c)
APPLICATION AND AUTHORIZATION FOR DELAYED PAYMENT OF TAX
ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS' HOMESTEAD
LAWS 1974, CHAPTER 206
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
� 19�
TO: County Auditor, Dakota County, Minnesota DATE
I, the undersigned, declare under penalties of perjury:
That I reside at L p &A9z fA1 111,v. 5- I.—
That
That I am not less than 65 years of age and that the date of my birth is
Th I am the owned of the property legally described as: _
, Property Identification No. /0- 0 2 $C0 -0/D
That my interest in the ownership of the above property was aquired ons 7
19 and is as follows:
1. Sole ownership (Enter Yes, if applicable
2. Joint tenancy, held with
3. 07,HER undivided interest (Snecif%•)
T;Lat on January 2, 19!V -j or Jure 1, 1996 I owned and occupied the above property as my
homestead and such occupancy began on � ,,,,� ,AF G 7 19 e_ )
That the installments �or improvements on the SPECIAL ASSESS?�.E'�?S duly adopted in ordin-
ance by the / Tr OF if,4 2,qt/ AS OF Za.L.� 19_f r -
which: have been allocated against the subject property would create undue p rsen 1 hard-
ship on my behalf and I respectfully request that payment be delayed and that such in-
stall me^._s be so deferred for the years 19-Eoto 2 0 Z 0
SIGNED: _a. -
0WNER SPOUSE
I, F_ T_ t'anOverbeke , Clerk of the City OF Eagan
IN Dakota County, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the application
Of E4k Q_._A__5bir1ey L. ErikstruR above named, has been duly reviewed ani that
in ac_erdance with they minutes of official record in said chambers was duly :
APPROVED or DENIED as of 19
That in accordance with approval granted, the SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS listed below on the
affiants subject property levied for annual collection in the amounts and for the years
shown be so deferred with interest at the annual rate shown until such time as it is
deemed the applicant no longer qualifies or the property loses its eligibility.
ASSESS%r_E-%iT D/P NO. TOTAL A.MO `NT YEARS INTEREST RATE
Sanitary Sewer Lateral 2065 $6,407.26 10
Water Lateral
Street
2066 3,857.18 10
2069
9,734.66
10
DATED 19
Clerk or Authorized Deputy
9%
9%
9%
(over)
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
DECLARE SURPLUS PROPERTYJADVERTISE FOR BIDS
1986 SNOWMOBU "LICE DEPARTMENT
E. Declare Surplus Property/Advertise for Bids, 1986 Snowmobile, Police Department—
The City currently owns a 1986 Arctic Cat Cougar snowmobile which was used by the
Police Department to enforce snowmobile violations. As a consequence of the increased
development and the decreased availability of areas of operation for snowmobiles within
the City, the Police Department has not had reason to use this vehicle for the past two
years and probably will not use it in the future. The current estimated value of the
property is between $1,800 and $2,300. If this request is approve, the Police Department
would propose to advertise for bids with a minimum bid of $1,800.
AC'T'ION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ][TEM: To declare the 1986 Arctic Cat
Cougar snowmobile surplus property and advertise for bids with a minimum bid of $1,800.
FINAL PLAT5UM ER PLACE SECOND ADDITION
F. Final Plat, Summer Place Second Addition—Documents relative to the final plat for
Summer Place Second Addition are being processed by both the applicant and the
Department of Community Development. Assuming the agreements are properly executed
and all conditions have been met, the final plat will be in order for approval at the July
17, 1990 Council meeting. If not, a recommendation to continue will be made at the time
of adoption of the agenda for the meeting.
Enclosed on page --L�— is a copy of the final plat as it appears for signature and
recording at Dakota County.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for
Summer Place Second Addition.
rr
W
c�
G
Cn
O
n a
33.06aF; b a 1J + .tea JJ
so
Mtn/ o
1^ °' o
Anc
f3
dO
s CiG
� F
' P. T MSL ... �. � •� �^�• � �+
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER #1
G. Contract 90.02, Change Order #1 (Park Shelter Building Construction)–Two additions
and one deduct with respect to park shelter building construction are identified within
Change Order #1. The conditions relate to the area of electric service which is not
included in the plans and specifications and a requirement to increase water service from
1 112 inches to 4 inches to conform with revised Engineering Department standards. The
deduct results from the substitution of cedar shingles for the metal roof on the Northview
Park shelter building. The less expensive roofing material results in a lower cost.
Together, these changes result in a net additional cost of $6,997.40. For additional
information in this regard, please refer to a memorandum from Parks Planner Sullivan
which is enclosed on pages--t'-'oe — through/(,a.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to
Contract 90-02 for park shelter building construction in the amount of $6,997.40.
N EMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, trTY ADINIFNISTRATOR
KE'N 'RAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN2 LA_N'DSCAPE ARCHTTECT/PARKS PLANNER
DATE: JULY 10, 1990 '
RE: CHANGE ORDER #1
I. C. 90-2
PARD SHELTER BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
This request for Change Order #1 within Contract 90-2 is for material and labor for the
follow r:g irnprovements:
I. Pro%ide direct burial electric service from the transformer to service panel at Northview
and 01hman Park Buildings.
(ADD) $2,722.50
* The plans and specifications do not include this work.
2. Increase water ser%ice size from 1-1/2" copper to 4" malleable iron at Bridle Ridge and
:�orth�iew Park Buildings.
(ADD) $6,664.90
* The Engineering Department has revised the standards for water service
eliminating 1-1;12" copper.
3. Substitute cedar shingle roof for metal roof at Northview Park.
SS nh
(DEDUCT) $ 2,390.00
* The wood shingle does not influence the visual architectural quality and provide
a significant savings to the project cost.
CHA'N'GE ORDER #1 TOTAL $6,997.40
15-'-
CHANGE Distribution to
• ORDER OWNER
❑
ARCHITECT
[►
AIA DOCL`.'l4t':'�'T G%OT CONTRACTOR
❑
FI ELD
❑
OTHER
❑
PROJECT: 1990 PARK BUILDING PROJECTS CHA',,GE ORDER NUMBER: ONE (1)
(name, address) CITY OF EAGAN PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT.
TO (Contractor) INITI aTION DATE: June 8, 1990
—
t W.H. CATES CONSTRUCTION, INC. --j ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 89035
300 HIGHWAY 55 CONTRACT FOR: GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
HAMEL, MN 55340
L J CONTRACT DATE: May 1 1990
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
A. Preside eirect burial electric service wiring at Northview Park and Ohman Park
Shelter tuildings per attached proposal request #1 and C.O. request #3
ADD $2,722.50
B. Increase water service size from 1 1/2" copper to 4" malleable iron at
Northview Park and Bridleridge Park shelter buildings per attached
proposal request #3 and C.O. requests 2.1 and 2.2
ADD 6,664.90
C. Substitute ceder shingle roof for metal roof at Northview Park
(Attached Cates Construction Co. letter of May 1, 1990).
DEDUCT -2,390.00
TOTAL $6,997.40
Not %alid until signed by both the O%tner and Architect.
Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time
The original iContract Sum; was ........................... $ 235746.00
Net change b•, pre•:iousk. authorized Change Orders ................................... $ -0-
The ,Contract Sum prior to this Change Order vas .......... $ 235746.00
The :Contract Sure will be (increased' rdeVAXAX9 X X 6997.40
b� th,s Change O -der ......................................................... $
The new lContract'urn i0,WX44MX&V6WkUXXncIuding this Change Order will be ... $ 242743.40
The Contract Time v d! be iunchanged.X
The Date of Completion as of the date of this Chanre Order therefore it, November 26, 1990
Authorized:
SCV WARZ?WEBER ARCHITECTS, INC W.H. CATES CONSTRUCTION, INC CITY OF EAGHN
`3"OT VHi" Vl ary 55
1ar1�1, MN 55340
AIA DOCUMENT G701 CHA\GE UDDER I APRIL 1976 EDITION I mN• _ 1978
THE ANIERIC k\ I\>TIT;'TE OF ARCHITECTS, 1-3; '.E'.\ YORK A%I . � t�� 7 C 20rnar, G701 — 1978
Agenda Information ?Nemo
July- 17, 1990, Cite Council Meeting
ACMOWLEDGE COMPLETIONN!AUTHOR_IZE FINIAL PYMT
NVELL #14
H. Contract 89-07, Acknowledge Completion/Authorize Final Payment (Well #14) -.The
City has received a request for final payment from the contractor along with a certification
from the City's consulting engineering firm of acceptable compliance with City approved
plans and specifications for the drilling and installation of Deep Well #14 located in
Thomas Lake Park adjacent to Pilot Knob Road. All final inspections have been
performed by appropriate City personnel and determined that this contract is in order for
favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITE.%I: To approve the 6th and final payment
for Contract 89-07 (Well #14) in the amount of $1,800 to E.H. Renner & Sons. Inc.
APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #2 0WELLS #14 R 15
I. Contract 89-08, Approve Change Order #2 (Wells #14 & #15, Pumping Facilities) --
During the excavation of the footings for Pumphouse #15. approximately 2' of unsuitable
material was discovered which had to be removed and replaced with compacted granular
sand prior to pouring the footings. This additional work required four hours of work and
101 tons of granular sand. The contract specifications indicated that existing conditions
were presumed suitable for installation of footings without corrective soil work.
Subsequently, the contract did not include an estimated cost for this soil correction
resulting in the need to process this change order in the amount of $1,068.01.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #2 for
Contract 89-08 (Wells #14 & #15 - Pumping Facilities) and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
�1
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990, City Council Meeting
ACKNOWLEDGE CO?17PLETIONIACCEPTANTCE/ *TICHAEL SILL ADDN
J. Project 88-U, Acknowledge Completion/Acceptance For City Maintenance (Michael Sill
Addition - Streets & Utilities) --The public streets and utilities necessary to service the
above -referenced development were designed and installed privately by the developer
under the terms and conditions of the development agreement for that subdivision. These
public improvements have now been completed, inspected by City staff and found to be
in compliance with the development plans and specifications. The developer is requesting
formal Council acknowledgement of their completion and the City's assumption of
perpetual maintenance responsibilities subject to the warranty provisions of the
development agreement. Staff has reviewed all related information, concurs with the
developer's request and recommends favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of
Contract 88-U (Michael Sill Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the assumption
of perpetual maintenance by the City subject to appropriate warranty provisions of the
development agreement.
RECEIVE FINAL ASS'1iT ROLLIORDER PUBLIC HEARING
(SOUTH OAKS - STREETLIGHTS)
K. Project 586, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (South Oaks -
Streetlights) --The installation of streetlights within the South Oaks Addition has been
completed and all costs associated with this project have been tabulated allowing the City
staff to prepare the final assessment roll for this public improvement. This assessment roll
is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling a public
hearing to formally present and receive comments regarding the proposed final
assessments.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS IMNI: To receive the final assessment roll
for Project 586 (South Oaks Addition - Streetlights) and schedule a public hearing to be
held on August 21, 1990.
is
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990, City Council Meeting
RECEIVE FINAL ASSMT ROLIJORDER PUBLIC HEARING
(,DAMES ST & CT - STREETLIGHTS)
L. Project 575, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (James Street &
Court - Streetlights) --The installation of streetlights on James Street and James Court has
been completed and all costs associated with this project have been tabulated allowing
the City staff to prepare the final assessment roll for this public improvement. This
assessment roll is being presented to the City Council for their consideration of scheduling
a public hearing to formally present and receive comments regarding the proposed final
assessments.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITE'11: To receive the final assessment roll
for Project 575 (James Street & Court -Streetlights) and schedule a public hearing to be
held on August 21. 1990.
ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETIONJAUTHORIZE FINAL PY`MT
(DANIEL DR)
M. Contract 88-26, Acknowledge CompletionrAuthorize Final Payment (Daniel Drive -
Streets & Utilities) --City staff has received a request for final payment from the contractor
for the above -referenced public improvement along with a certification from the consulting
engineer that the work was performed in accordance with City approved plans and
specifications. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public
Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the fourth and final
payment for Contract 88-26 (Daniel Drive - Streets & Utilities) in the amount of $9,539.72
to Imperial Developers. Inc.
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990, City Council Meeting
ACKNOWLEDGE COMPLETION/ACCEPT FOR CITY MAINTENANCE
(DEERWOOD ADDN)
N. Project 88-J, Acknowledge Completion/Accept For City Maintenance (Deet VVV"U
Addition - Streets & Utilities) --The public streets and utilities necessary to service the
above -referenced development were designed and installed privately by the developer
under the terms and conditions of the development agreement for that subdivision. These
public improvements have now been completed, inspected by City staff and found to be
in compliance with the development plans and specifications. The developer is requesting
formal Council acknowledgement of their completion and the City's assumption of
perpetual maintenance responsibilities subject to the warranty provisions of the
development agreement. Staff has reviewed all related information, concurs with the
developer's request and recommends favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of
Contract 88-J (Deerwood Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the assumption of
perpetual maintenance by the City subject to appropriate warranty provisions of the
development agreement.
ACKNOWLEDGE_ COMPLETION/ACCEPT FOR CITY MAINTENANCE
(WOODLANDS. ADDN1
_
O. Project 88 -II, Acknowledge Completion/Accept For City Maintenance (Woodlands
Addition - Streets & Utilities) --The public streets and utilities necessary to service the
above -referenced development were designed and installed privately by the developer
under the terms and conditions of the development agreement for that subdivision. These
public improvements have now been completed, inspected by City staff and found to be
in compliance with the development plans and specifications. The developer is requesting
formal Council acknowledgement of their completion and the City's assumption of
perpetual maintenance responsibilities subject to the warranty provisions of the
development agreement. Staff has reviewed all related information, concurs with the
developer's request and recommends favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERS N THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of
Contract 88 -II (Woodlandv Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the assumption
of perpetual maintenance by the City subject to appropriate warranty provisions of the
development agreement.
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990, City Council '.fleeting
APPRONT PLANS AUTHORIZE AD FOR BIDS
MEST PUBLISHING 3RD & WILMUS ADDN)
P. Contract 90-09, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad For Bids (West Publishing 3rd & Wilmus
Addition - Trunk Storm Sewer)Contract90-09 incorporates Project 585 (West Publishing
3rd Addition) along with Project 592 (Wilmus Addition) for the installation of trunk storm
sewer facilities as authorized by the public hearings held on January 16 and May 17, 1990.
respectively. At that time, detailed plans and specifications were ordered for preparation.
These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the City Council for
consideration of authorizing a formal solicitation of bids for subsequent consideration of
contract award.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 90-
09 (XVest Publishing 3rd Addition & Wilmus Addition - Trunk Storm Sewer) and authorize
the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:00 a.m., Friday. August 17, 1990.
a I
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
AMENDNIEh9A IDSCAPE ORDINANCEICHAPTER 10, SECTION 10.20 AND 10.21
Q. Amendment, Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 10, Sections 10.20, Shade Tree Control
and prevention; and 10.21, Planting and Main nance of Trees and Grass on Private
Property—Enclosed on pages a through for your review are final versions of the
above referenced sections as they pertain to shade tree disease control and prevention and
planning and maintenance of trees and grass on private property. These portions of the
ordinance amendments were inadvertently excluded from the action item on the landscape
ordinance at the July 10, 1990 City Council meeting. They have also been previously
reviewed by Council in a work session.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve amendment to the City
Code Chapter 10, Sections 10.20 and 10.21 concerning landscape regulations.
a.,/2--
CHAPTER 10 PUBLIC PROTECTION, CRIMES, AND OFFENSES
SEC 10.20 SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION
Subd. 1 Policy and Purpose
The City has determined that the health of oak and elm trees is
threatened by fatal disases known as oak wilt and Dutch elm
disease. It has also been determined that the health of many tree
species may be threatened by diseases of an epidemic nature. It
has further been determined that the loss of oak, elm and other
trees threatened by epidemic diseases on public and private
property would substantially depreciate the value of property and
impair the safety, good order, general welfare, and convenience of
the public. It is declared to be the intention of the council to
control and prevent the spread of these diseases, and provide for
the removal of dead or diseased trees, herein defined as nuisances.
Subd. 2 Definitions
The following terms, as used in this section, shall have the
meanings stated:
A• "Shade Tree Disease" - Dutch elm disease, oak wilt
disease, or any other tree disease of an epidemic nature
as declared by the Council.
11
B. "Nuisance"
1. Any living or standing trees infected to any degree
with a shade tree disease.
2. Any logs, branches, stumps, or other parts of any
dead or dying tree so infected unless such parts
have been fully burned or treated under the
direction of the city forester or tree inspector.
3. Any standing dead trees or limbs on public or
private property which may threaten human health or
property.
C. "Forester" - A qualified person, holding a combination
of education and experience equivalent to a four year
college degree in Urban Forestry, hired to perform the
duties of the City Forester as designated by the Council.
The forester shall exercise the powers and duties
necessary to enforce the provisions of this ordinance.
The forester shall be a certified pesticide applicator
and a certified tree inspector under the laws of the
State of Minnesota. The powers and duties of the
forester may be assigned to other qualified persons in
his absence.
12
,�4
D. Duties of Forester
It is the duty of the forester to administer all
activities of the City relating to the control and
prevention of Dutch elm disease, oak wilt, and other
epidemic diseases of shade trees. Each year, the
forester shall recommend the details of a program for the
control of said diseases and shall perform the duties
incident to such a program. The forester shall also act
as liaison between the City and the public, keeping the
public informed of new changes, modifications or
developments related to City policies or tree
maintenance.
E. Duties of Tree Inspectors
It is the duty of tree inspectors, under direction and
control of the city forester to know the appropriate
Minnesota laws and rules relative to oak wilt, Dutch elm,
and other epidemic diseases of shade trees and to know
the approved control methods of these diseases. The
inspectors must know the proper method of collecting
samples for the purpose of diagnosing disease. The
inspector, when so designated, shall assist the city
forester in the planning and control of shade tree
diseases.
13
as
Subd. 3 Scope and Adoption by Reference
Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.023, is hereby adopted by reference,
together with the Rules and Regulations of the Minnesota
Commisioner of Agriculture relating to shade tree diseases;
provided, that this Section shall supersede such Statutes, Rules
and Regulations, only to the extent of inconsistencies.
Subd. 4 Unlawful Act
It is unlawful for any person to keep, maintain or permit, upon
Premises owned by him or upon public property where he has the duty
of tree maintenance, any nuisance as herein defined.
Subd. 5 Inspection, Diagnosis and Abatement
It is the power and duty of the forester or tree inspector to enter
upon private property at any reasonable time for the purpose of
inspecting for, and diagnosing, and if necessary, abating shade
tree disease. In the case of suspected shade tree disease, and in
the performance of his duties, the tree inspector or forester may
remove such specimens or samples as may be necessary or desirable
for diagnosis.
14
Subd. 6 Abatement of Nuisance
Abatement of a nuisance, defined herein, shall be by spraying,
removing, burning, or otherwise effectively treating the infected
tree or wood to prevent spread of shade tree disease. Such
abatement procedures shall be carried out in accordance with
current technical and expert methods and plans as may be designed
by the Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Minnesota. The
City shall establish specifications for tree removal and disposal
methods consistent therewith. Such stAnA., .4- -u-,, L . _
in the office of the City Forester and shall be revised from time
to time based on current research.
Subd. 7 Procedure for Removal of Trees and Wood
A. Whenever the City Forester or Tree Inspector finds, with
reasonable certainty, that the infection or danger of
infection exists in any tree or wood on any public or
private property, he shall proceed as follows:
1• If the tree inspector or forester finds that the
danger of infection of other trees is not imminent
because of dormancy of the shade tree disease, he
15
C�7
may choose to reinspect said tree either later the
same growing season or at the beginning of the
following growing season. If at that time the tree
has not recovered, the tree inspector or forester
shall proceed by abating the nuisance as a public
improvement under Minnesota Statute 429.
2. If the tree inspector or forester finds that danger
of infection to other trees is imminent, he shall
notify the owner of the property by certified mail
that the nuisance will be abated by a specific time,
not more than 20 days from the date of receipt of
such notice. After the expiration of the notice the
tree inspector may abate the nuisance.
3. If the tree inspector or forester finds with
reasonable certainty that immediate action is
required to prevent the spread of shade tree
disease, he may proceed to abate the nuisance
forthwith. When an outside contractor is hired to
abate said nuisance, that contractor must meet the
licensing requirements as stated in Sec. 7.08, Subd.
1, of the City code. The forester shall upon the
completion of the nuisance abatement, ascertain the
cost attributable to each lot. The City Clerk -
Treasurer shall certify to the County Auditor of
Dakota County a statement of the amount of the cost
incurred by the City. Such amount together with
interest shall be entered as a special assessment
against such lot or parcel of land and be collected
in the same manner as real estate taxes.
B. The Tree Inspector shall keep a record of the costs of
abatements done under this Subdivision and shall report
monthly to the City Clerk -Treasurer all work done for
which assessment are to be made stating and certifying
the description of the land, lots, parcels involved and
the amount chargeable to each.
C. On or before September 1 of each year, the City Clerk -
Treasurer shall list the total unpaid charges for each
abatement against each separate lot or parcel to which
they are attributable under this Section. The Council
may then spread the charges or any portion thereof
against the property involved as a special assessment
under Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.101 and other
pertinent statutes for certification to the County
Auditor and collection the following year along with
current taxes.
17
D. No damage shall be awarded the owner for destruction of
any tree, wood or part thereof pursuant to this Section.
Subd. 8 Spraying Trees
A. Whenever the forester of tree inspector determine that
any tree or wood is infected or threatened with
infection, he may spray or treat all nearby high value
trees with an effective pesticide or fungicide or both.
Activities authorized by this subdivision shall be
conducted in accordance with current technical and expert
specifications or, where appropriate, the plans of the
Commissioner of Agriculture.
B. The notice and assessment provisions of Subdivision 7
apply to spraying and treatment operations conducted
under this Subdivision.
Subd. 9 Transporting Wood Prohibited
It is a petty misdemeanor for any person to transport any elm wood
into or through the City unless the same is debarked, or, in the
months of April, May or June, to transport any oak wood, without
having obtained a permit from the tree inspector. The tree
18
3e
inspector shall grant such permits only when the purposes of this
Section will be served thereby.
Subd. 10 Interference Prohibited
It is unlawful for any person to prevent, delay or interfere with
the forester or tree inspector while they are engaged in the
performance of duties imposed by this Section.
Subd. 11 Diseased Trees in Streets
The rights, duties and responsibilities of property owners set
forth in this Section shall be equally applicable to, and binding
upon, abutting property owners with tree maintenance
responsibilities under Section 7.08 of the City Code entitled
"Regulation of Grass, Weeds and Trees".
Subd. 12 Subsidies
The duty of any property owner to bear the cost of removing or
maintaining trees, whether by private contract or assessment, may
be subject to a subsidy policy, if any, established by the City
for the treatment or removal of trees infected with shade tree
disease.
SEC. 10.21 PLANTING AND MAINTENANCE OF TREES AND GRASS ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY
Subd. 1 Purpose and Application
The regulations set forth in this Section are for the purpose of
protecting and promoting the public health, safety and general
welfare of the people of the City by regulating the planting and
maintenance of trees in order to protect trees and to prevent and
abate hazaradous and nuisance conditions within the City. This
Section applies to all private property at all times on a
continuing basis.
Subd. 2 Turfgrass Establishment
It is the primary responsibility of any owner or occupant of any
lot to establish suitable turfgrass on all maintained portions of
said property within a period of one full growing season from the
completion of final grading or date of occupancy, whichever is
sooner. Maintained areas are defined to include all front and side
lots and all rear portions of the lot which are intended for
private usage, occupation. EaTK maintenance-) In cases where
turfgrass establishment is required for the purposes of controlling
erosion, the City may, at its discretion, establish a shorter
period of time for compliance with this provision.
Subd. 3 City to Control Tree Planting
It shall be unlawful to introduce prohibited species to any lot or
20
5-
land parcel whre such trees are not naturally occurring.
Prohibited species are defined as the following trees:
Gingko (female only)
Box elder
Non disease resistant elm species
Non hybrid cottonwood species
Subd. 4 Maintenance of Grass, Weeds, and Trees
It is the primary responsibility of any owner or occupant of any
lot or parcel of land to abate any nuisance or noxious [-mainta-in
any-] weeds, to maintain turfgrass {-or-gre,&s] growing thereon at a
height of not more than six inches, to remove all public health or
safety hazards therefrom, [-to-insta-ll-or-r-eparr-water-sere-iee-li-nes
-thQxsom,-] and to treat or remove insect -infested, diseased [-trees-],
or nuisance trees.
Subd. 5 Shade Tree Diseases
A. It is unlawful for any peson to keep, maintain or permit, upon
premises owned by him or upon public property where he has the
duty of tree maintenance, any nuisance as defined in Section
10.20 "Shade Tree Disease Control and Prevention," of the City
Code.
21
33
B. Inspection, diagnosis and abatement of a nuisance shall be by
spraying, removing, burning, or otherwise effectively treating
the infected tree or wood in accordance with the procedures
and methods specified in Section 10.20 of the City Code.
Subd. 6 City to Perform Work
If any such owner or occupant fails to assume the primary
responsibility described in Subd. 2, Subd. 4, or Subd. 5 of this
section, and after notice given, has not complied within the
allowed time, the City may cause such work to be done and the
expenses thus incurred shall be a lien upon such real estate. The
City Clerk -Treasurer shall certify to the County Auditor of Dakota
County a statement of the amount of the cost incurred by the City.
Such amount, together with interest, shall be entered as a special
assessment against such lot or parcel of land and be collected in
the same manner as real estate taxes.
17wp:treeordn.059
Rev. 5/18/90
22
34
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
REVISED FEE SCHEDULE
BEER. WINE AND LIQUOR LICENSING AND REGULATION
A. Revised Fee Schedule, Beer, Wine and Liquor Licensing and Regulation—A notice of
public hearing in regard to the above referenced item was published in the July S, 1990
edition of the Dakota County Tribune and notices were sent to all current holders of beer,
wine and liquor licenses. A copy of the notice is enclosed for your review on pages
through _J7 . The City Council has also reviewed this matter in the past at work
sess ns and a copy the survey information pertinent to this matter is enclosed on pages
through Ll
At the present time, staff is suggesting increases in all license categories to place fees
more in line with those of comparable communities. Comments concerning level of fees
has been received at previous work sessions and by staff in anticipation of Tuesdav's
hearing. It is expected that a number of the current license holders will be present to
cuss the fee levels.
TION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and
)rove, modify or deme the proposed increase in liquor license fees as presented.
3-!5
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED
INCREASE IN LIQUOR LICENSE FEES
IN THE CITY OF EAGAN, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the city Council of the City of
Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, will meet at the Eagan Municipal
Center at 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, Minnesota 55121, on Tuesday,
July 17, 1990, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as possible. The
purpose of the meeting will be to hold a public hearing on the
proposed increase in liquor license fees. The proposed increased fees
are listed below.
FROM:
TO:
Off -sale beer
$ 40
$ 75
On -sale beer
175
350
On -sale wine
200
2,000
On -sale liquor
3,500
7,500
FURTHER:
Wine investigation fee $ 200 $ 350
Wine/Beer combination 350 400
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question
of whether or not the above increases in fees should be made shall be
heard at said time and place.
Dated this 11th day of June, 1990.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Vn J� A %&Lat
By: J. VanOverbeke
Ea n City Clerk
'EES
Wm The following pages show liquor licenses fees identified in
a 1989 Association, of Metropolitan Municipalities survey. The
City of Eagan generally falls in the low end of the range.
f
0
The range and average for cities over 20,000
g g population are
shown on the bottom of each page along with a suggested fee.
a
I
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
3.2 BEER OFF SALE
CITIES 0 - 2,500
FEE
CITIES 10,000 - 20,000
FEE
St. Francis
25.00
Anoka
25.00
Spring Park
80.00
Champlin
35.00
Woodland
NIA
Chaska
50.00
Columbia Heights
75.00
CITIES 2,500 - 10,000
Hastings
25.00
Hopkins
25.00
Araen Hills
40.00
Mounds View
110/year
Bzyport
75.00
No. St. Paul
50.00
Chanhassen
50.00
Oakdale
50.00
Circle Pines
25.00
Prior Lake
50.00
Dayton
15.00
Ramsey
Deephaven
30.00
Robbinsdale
50.00
Falcon Heights
50.00
Shakopee
100.00
Mahtomeci
50.00
Stillwater
5.00
Mendota Heights
15.00
West St. Paul
20.00
Mound
25.00
Woodbury
50.00
Newport
75.00
Orono
25.00
Osseo
15.00
Rosemount
15.00
St. Anthony
75.00
St. Paul Park
30.00
Savage
30.00
Snorewoad
25.00
Spring Lake Faris
50.00
Wayzata
75.00
CITIES OVER 20 OGO
Apple Valley
40.00
Golden Valley
50.00
Blaine
35.00
Inver Grove Hgts.
35.00
Bloomington
50.00
Lakeville
30.00
Brooklyn Center
100.00
Maple Grove
35.00
Brooklyn, Paris
Sc. tc
Maplewood
Burnsville
65/year
Minneapolis
130.00
Coon Raids
75.00
Minnetonka
100.00
Cottage Grove
50.00
New Brighton
55.00
Crystal
42.00
New Hope
50.00
Eagan
40.00
Plymouth
85.00
Eden Prairie
10.00
Richfield
Eaina 220.00;1/renew
Roseville
30.00
Fridley
60. 0
St. Louis Park
50.00
St. Paul
75.75
South St. Paul
10.00
RANGE = $10 - $165
AVE.=
$58.35 SUGGEST: $75.00
i
ICITIES 0 - 2,500 FEE
St. Francis 100.00
Spring Park 11064.00
Woodland N/A
CITIES 2,500 - 10,000
Arden Hills 120.00
Bayport 100.00
Chanhassen 250.00
Circle F:r.es
Da yton
100. 00
Deephaven
50.00
Falcon Heights
100.00
Mahtomedi
65.00
Mendcta Heights
150.00
Mound
200.00
Newport
1C.00
Orono
75.00
Osseo
100.00
f osemount
100.00
St. Anthony
2C0. 00
St. Paul Fark
250.00
Savage
200.00
Shorewood
25.00
Spring LaKe Fark
300.00
idayzata
500.00
Apple Palley
200.00
Blaine
300.00
Bloomington
600.00
Brooklyn Center
500.00
Brooklyn Park
30c.00
Burnsville
400.00
Coon Rapids
350.00
Cottage Grove
250.00
Crystal
522.50
Eagan
175.00
Eden Prairie
50.00
Edina
220.00; 165
Fridley
325.00
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
3.2 BEER ON -SALE
CITIES 10,000 - 20,,000 FEE
Anoka
250.00
Champlin
250.00
Chaska
300.00
Columbia Heights
325.00
Hastings
100.00
Hopkins
600.00
Mounds View
1,100/year
No. St. Paul
100.00
Oakdale
250.00
Prior Lake
200.00
Ramsey
Robtinsdale
550.00
Shakopee
312.00
Stillwater
50.00
West St. Paul
200.00
W_,odbury
300.00
CITIES OVER 20,000
Golden Valley 450.00
Inver Grove Hgts. 250.00
Lakeville 150.00
Maple Grove 300.00
Maplewood
Minneapolis 725-3,315 dep.on entm't
Minnetonka 650/n;500 renew
New Brighton 160.00
New Hope 500.00
Plymouth 400.00
Richfield
renew Roseville 100.00
St. Louis Park 750.00
St. Paul 379.50
South St. Paul 100.00
RANGE = $50 - $750 AVE. = $327 ST)rrEST: $350
CITIES OVER 20,000
Apple Valley
ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGE
61250.00
Blaine
LIQUOR
ON -SALE
39120.00
CITIES 0 - 2,500
FEE CITIES 10,000 -
20,000 FEE
St. Francis
41000.00
Anoka
50.00
Spring Park
N/A
Champlin
51000.00
Woodland
N/A
Chaska
3,750.00
39935.00
Coon Rapids
Columbia Heights 6,300.00 w/bar
CITIES 2,500 - 10,000_
79500.00
Hastings
2,300.00
New Brighton
4-12,000 dep.on
Hopkins
79500.00
Arden Hills 3000-6000
dep.sq.ft.
Mounds View
49730 + $/sq.ft.
Bayport
1,000
No. St. Paul
21000.00
Chanhassen 5600-13,600
dep.sq.ft.
Oakdale
3,500.00
Circle Pines
49000
Prior Lake
4,750.00
Dayton
3,000
Ramsey
Deephaven
N/A
Robbinsdale
51500.00
Falcon Heights
49000
Shakopee
dep.on sq.ft.
Mahtomedi
20100.00
Stillwater
21000.00
Mendota Heights
10,000; 3,000 limited
West St. Paul
2,500.00
Mound
4,000.00
Woodbury
109000.00
Newport
1,500.00
Orono
4,000.00
Osseo
5,750.OG
Rosemount
2,000.00
St. Anthony
St. Paul Park
2,500.00
Savage
7,500.00
Shorewood
79500.00
Spring Lake Park
C1.A 5000; C1.B 7500
wayzata
8,000.00
CITIES OVER 20,000
Apple Valley
51000.00
Golden Valley
61250.00
Blaine
59500.00
Inver Grove Hgts.
39120.00
Bloomington
81000.00
Lakeville
39500.00
Brooklyn Center
C1.A 8,000;B/11;C&D14
Maple Grove
5.500.00
Brooklyn Park
c0; 00c. 00
Maplewood
Burnsville
59000.00
Minneapolis
39935.00
Coon Rapids
61000.00
Minnetonka
79500.00
Cottage Grove
3.000.00
New Brighton
4-12,000 dep.on
Crystal
5,500.00
New Hope
69000.00
Eagan
39500.00
Plymouth
7,500.00
Eden Prairie
71500.00
Richfield
109750.00
Edina
N/A
Roseville
7,000.00
Fridley dep.on
sq.ft. & entm't.
St. Louis Park
5400 - 7800
St. Paul
dep. on class
South St. Paul
2280.00
RANGE= $2250 -
$10,750 AVE. = $5634
SUGGEST: $7500
sz.
I
CITIES 0 - 2,500_
St. Francis
Spring Park
Woodland
CITIES 2,500 - 10,000
AdINE ON -SALE
FEE CITIES 10,000 - 20,000 FEE
100.00 Anoka
N/A Champlin
N/A Chaska
Columbia Heights
Arden Hills 21000.00
Bayport N/A
Chanhassen 2,000 or 1/2 or, sa.lesser
i Circle Pines
Dayton
200.00
Deephaver.
N/A
Falcon Heig"ts
21000.00
Mahtozedi
150.00
Mendota HeiE' is
2, 000.00
Mound
200.00
Newport
2,000.00
Orono
750.00
Osseo
8 cc. cc
RcsetioUnt
250.00
St. Anthc:ny
250.00
St. Pa;:l Farr:
300.00
Savage
Minnetonka
Shoren �d
L200.00
500.00
Spring Lake Park
500.00
Wayzata
11500.00
Hastings
Hopkins
Mounds View
No. St. Paul
Oakdale
Prior Lake
Ramsey
Robbinsdale
Shakopee 2,000
Stillwater
West St. Paul
Woodbury
CITIES OVER 20,000
400.00
250.00
750.00
2,000.00
200.00
$00.00
500.00
200.00
600.00
1,250.00
2,000.00
or 1/2 on sa.lesser
200.00
750.07
1,000.00
Apple Valley
900.00
Golden Valley
21000.00
Blaine •
900.00
Inver Grove Hgts.
500.00
Bloomington
11750.00
Lakeville
500.00
Brooklyn, Center
2,000.00
Maple Grove
2,000.00
Brooklyn Park
8 cc. cc
Maplewood
Burnsville
750.00
Minneapolis 1000-2000 dep.on
Coon Rapids 1000
up to 99/more 2000
Minnetonka
21000.00
Cottage Grove
200.00
New Brighton
21000.00
Crystal
500.00
New Hope
21000.00
Eagan
200.00
Plymouth
10900.00
Eden Prairie
29000.00
Richfield
750.00
Edina 550-700 dep. on seats
Roseville 750-1500 dep.on
Fridley
11000.00
St. Louis Park
2,000.00
St. Paul
N/A
South St. Paul
750.00
RANGE = $200 - $2000 AVE. = $1245 SUGGEST: $2000
entry.
seats
1990 SURVEY
LIQUOR - WINE - BEER - LICENSE FEES
�D_
Graph l
G_ r, h 2
Graph3
Graph 4
Nan-ln=xicatirv.
Malt Li r
On -Sale
On-Sa le
Of f-Sa le
Liquor
Wine
Beer
Beer
Apple Valley
$4000 x$250,000
$1000
$400
$75
5000
250,000-
500,000
6000
>500,000
Brooklyn nark
6000
800
300
50
Btlrrsville
5000
750
400
65
Cccr Rapids
6300
seat 35-99
1000
368
79
seat >100
2000
Eagan,
3500
200
175
40
Eden Prairie
7500
2000
50
10
Maple Grove
5500
2000
300
35
Minnetonka
7500
2000
initial 650
100
reraal 500
�D_
GRAPH 1
1990 ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FEES
e
7
a
2
1.9
1.8
17
1a
1.5
1.4
1.3
E Its' !1 AIG OP CR E P A4
*based or; vclune of liquor sales
GRAPH 2
1990 WINE LICENSE FEES
F dP CR CA EP HC N
..,
2'°
mo
o
,co
100
90
w
70
1 In
2
w
�o
0
GRAPH 3
1990 ON—SALE BEER LICENSE FEES
EP E BP MG m m
RENEWAL INITIAL
GRAPH 4
1990 OFF—SALE BEER LICENSE FEES
0
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990, City Council Meeting
WATER QUALITY POS -67
B. Project 594, Water Quality Pond JP -67 --On June 19, the City Council received the
feasibility report for the above-refereipced project and scheduled a public hearing to be
held on July 17. Enclosed on pages_through is a copy of the feasibility report
for the Council's information and review during the presentation by City staff.
This particular project is the first of the City's proposed. water quality improvements to
help maintain/improve water quality in high priority waterbodies such as Fish Lake. The
location of this pond incorporates three previous tax forfeit parcels, two of which the City
has already obtained appropriate easements from Dakota County. The third and major
piece (part of Lot 1, Block 1 - Pilot Knob Heights) was sold to a developer by HRA prior
to reserving the required easements for this proposed improvement. Subsequently, the
City will be forced to acquire the necessary easements to accommodate this project if it
is approved by Council action. Preliminary discussions with the proposed developer have
not been able to arrive at a satisfactory value for the easement acquisition.
Although this project would be financed by the City's Storm Water Utility Fund and not
assessed against any private property, a neighborhood meeting was held at 5:30 p.m., on
Wednesday, July 11, 1990, to inform adjacent property owners of the proposed
improvements and its potential impact on their properties. Four homeowners from the
Hidden Oaks Homeowners Association and the owner of Hardware Hank attended the
neighborhood meeting. As a result of this meeting, the property owners raised a safety-
concern requesting that consideration be given to installing a chain link fence along the
south side of the pond adjacent to the townhouses in addition to the landscaping. The
most easterly end unit presently is a licensed daycare facility that would not be allowed
to continue without a fence due to the proposed development of this ponding area. They
collectively expressed a desire to work with the final detailed landscaping plan to meet
their specific desires. It was also stated that they do not wish to assume any maintenance
responsibilities associated with the area around this pond.
The Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further detail the concerns and
issues associated with this proposed improvement at the public hearing on July 17.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and
approve/deny Project 594, Water Quality Pond JP -67 and, if approved, authorize the
preparation of detailed plans and specifications along with acquisition of easements
through condemnation if necessary.
Report for
Pond JP -67
Trunk Storm Sewer/
Water Ouality Management
Project No. 594
Eagan, Minnesota
June 1990
File No. 49510
Bones troo
Rosene
0
Anderlik &
Associates
Engina*rt & Architects
St. ftuL Yinn..ot.
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Pond JP -67
Trunk Storm Sewer
Project No. 594
Our File No. 49510
Dear Mayor and Council:
Attached is our report for Pond JP -67 Trunk Storm Sewer/Water Quality Man-
agement. This project is one of the first public improvements to be under-
taken under the newly adopted Water Quality Management Plan.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss this report.
Sincerely,
BONESTRO ,
Phi
ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
q lip Gravel
III
LPG:li
Approved
I hereby certify that this report was FrApared
by me or under my direct supervisiou and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of nnes tan
L. Phil ip Gravel III
Date:- June 11, 1990 Reg. No. 19864
Date:
RPT49510
2335 West Highway 36 9 St. Paul, Minnesota
i 3 • 612-636-4600
Otto G Benmve PE
Keith A Gcrd— PE
James R Wand. PE
Thomas R Anderson, A; A
Bones t roo
Robert W Rosene PE
Richard W Foster. PE
Kenneth P Anderson PE
Gay F Rylande• PE
Joseph C Anded;k PE
Donald C Burgaidt. PE
Mark R Rot's PE
Miles B Jensen PE
Rosene
Marvin L Sovala PE
Richard E Turner PE
Jerry A Bourdon. PE
Mark A Hanson PE
Robert C Russek A I A
Thomas E Angus. PE
L Phillip G,a%v Ill. PE
Rene C Pluma^_ A! A
a
Anderlik &
James C Olson. PE
Glenn R Cook PE
Ted K Peld PE
M�raer T Rauhnann PE
Howam4 A Sanford PE
Dana J Edgerton. PE
Ages M Ring !! IC P
Jer y D Permsch. PE.
Thomas E Noyes PE
Robert R PfeRerie PE
Mark A Sero PE
Cecaio Olivier PE
Robert G SChuniCh: PE
David 0 Loskota PE
Pharr J CasvmP PE
Charles A EricksonAssociates
Susan M Ebenin, CPA
Thomas W Peterson PE
Ismael Martinez PE
Leo M Pav«elsky
Michael C lynch. PE
Mark D Wallis, PE
Haran M. Olson
Engineers & Architects
June 11, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Pond JP -67
Trunk Storm Sewer
Project No. 594
Our File No. 49510
Dear Mayor and Council:
Attached is our report for Pond JP -67 Trunk Storm Sewer/Water Quality Man-
agement. This project is one of the first public improvements to be under-
taken under the newly adopted Water Quality Management Plan.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss this report.
Sincerely,
BONESTRO ,
Phi
ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
q lip Gravel
III
LPG:li
Approved
I hereby certify that this report was FrApared
by me or under my direct supervisiou and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of nnes tan
L. Phil ip Gravel III
Date:- June 11, 1990 Reg. No. 19864
Date:
RPT49510
2335 West Highway 36 9 St. Paul, Minnesota
i 3 • 612-636-4600
POND JP -67
TRUNK STORM SEWER/WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 594
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.
SCOPE
3.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION
3•
FIGURE NO. 1 - LOCATION PLAN
4.
DISCUSSION
5.
STORM SEWER
5.
EASEMENTS AND PERMITS
7.
COST ESTIMATE
8.
ASSESSMENTS
8.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
8.
APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
9•
FIGURE NO. 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
FIGURE NO. 3 - PROPOSED CONDITIONS
FIGURE NO. 4 - PROPOSED EASEMENTS
Page 2.
RPT49510
POND JP -67
TRUNK STORM SEWER/WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 594
SCOPE
This project provides for the reconstruction of trunk storm sewer Pond
JP -67 and the acquisition of a ponding easement for that pond. The improve-
ments will develop Pond JP -67 to provide the necessary water quality parame-
ters to maximize its nutrient removal capability. The required storage volume
for a 100 year event storm will also be provided. Pond JP -67 is located
southwest of the intersection of Duckwood Drive and Denmark Avenue (see Figure
No. 1). Pond JP -67 works hydraulically in conjunction with Pond JP -66.
Outflow from these ponds flows through Pond JP -15 and into Fish Lake. The
purpose of this project is to develop and define Pond JP -67 by easement and to
increase its 'wet volume" to improve its storm water treatment capacity and
thus reduce its impact on Fish Lake.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accor-
dance with the objectives established in the City's 1990 Comprehensive Storm
Water Management Plan and Water Quality Management Plan. The project can best
be carried out as one contract or in conjunction with similar improvement
projects.
RPT49510
Page 3.
T.
i,
o
t=
,
o
_ 1 0
Y0 .ee Epodle Rd
`. �—._..... p- �—..
_ r E J
uckwood
Dr~rf,�
JP-
T"R�
;.: Qp Q:
yy yy
� ��. i 11 � •'�Y i'1.1.11.
��� \ '
----------------
Project Location
0 2000 4000
Scale in feet
Pond JP -67 Improvements
Location Plan
City Project No. 594
so
Bonestroo EflQtMora &i;chItacts
KimRosene
Anderllk
l` Associates st. rw trEnr,..ota
Date: June 1990
Comm. 49510 F-ig. No. 1
DISCUSSION
Storm Sewer - Storm sewer described herein provides for the construction of a
water quality pond (Pond JP -67) to provide nutrient removal for storm water
runoff from approximately 24.0 acres of primarily Retail Commercial Develop-
ment.
Presently Pond JP -67 provides adequate hydraulic capacity (volume between
the normal water level and the high water level) but provides essentially no
'wet volume" (volume below the normal water level). Analysis of the drainage
area characteristics was performed using the Walker Quality Model to determine
the required pond characteristics for adequate nutrient removal. By using the
model analysis and examining the limited site characteristics, it was deter-
mined that a pond with the characteristics listed below would best provide the
necessary hydraulic and water quality benefits.
POND JP -67 DESIGN INFORMATION
Drainage Area 24.0 Acres
Existing Wet Volume 0.3 Acre feet
Phosphorus Concentration 194 ppm
Required Wet Volume 5.6 Acre feet
Proposed Water Depth 10 feet (Max.)
Nutrient Removal 62 Percent
Required Hydraulic Storage 2.9 Acre feet
Design Outflow 20 cfs
Pond Configuration 2 cell
The parameters listed above can be achieved by regrading the existing pond
area and excavating material to provide the necessary wet volume. The pro-
posed grading for Pond JP -67 is shown on Figure No. 3. The proposed grading
will provide the maximum possible amount of wet volume. The pond configura-
Page 5.
RPT49510
tion will consist of a two cell pond to maximize the nutrient removal before
discharging to Fish Lake. Design characteristics of Pond JP -67 in accordance
with the 1990 Comprehensive Storm Vater Man- agement Plan are listed below.
Also listed are parameters for Pond JP -66 which functions in conjunction with
Pond JP -67. The water quality parameters of Pond JP -66 will be developed when
Dutlot E of Town centre 70 First Addition is developed.
From a rater quality standpoint, Ponds JP -66 and 67 are designed to
function separately during a 2" rainfall event. As a result, additional storm
sewer and modification to the existing stor.z sewer system are also required.
New storm sewer incudes constructing an outlet pipe from Pond JP -67 to the
existing 42" storm sewer in Denmark Avenue. In addition, because the combined
outflow from Pond JP -66 and 67 is 22 cfs, the storm water outflow will have to
be controlled in the existing manhole in Denmark Avenue which incorporates the
outlet pipes from each pond and the existing 42" storm sewer outlet pipe for
this area. The existing 48" equalizer pipe between ponds JP -66 and 67 in
Duckwood Drive is required during large event storms to equalize the existing
storage in each pond. However, during small event storms where the ponding
areas function primarily for water quality purposes, the OR equalizer pipe is
not required. Therefore, it is proposed to construct a timber or concrete box
around the upstream end of the existing 48" RCP apron preventing low flows
from discharging directly from Pond JP -67 into Pond JP -66. The top of the box
will be located at elevation 876 which is 4' above the normal water level of
Page 6.
RPT49510
S�-
Vet
Drainage
Pond
Volume
Pond Area
Bottom
NWL HWL Required Std
JP -67 24.0 Ac.
862.0
872 880 4.8 ac.ft. 2.9 ac.ft.
JP -66 48.0 Ac.
862.0
872 880 8.1 ac.ft. 5.0 ac.ft.
From a rater quality standpoint, Ponds JP -66 and 67 are designed to
function separately during a 2" rainfall event. As a result, additional storm
sewer and modification to the existing stor.z sewer system are also required.
New storm sewer incudes constructing an outlet pipe from Pond JP -67 to the
existing 42" storm sewer in Denmark Avenue. In addition, because the combined
outflow from Pond JP -66 and 67 is 22 cfs, the storm water outflow will have to
be controlled in the existing manhole in Denmark Avenue which incorporates the
outlet pipes from each pond and the existing 42" storm sewer outlet pipe for
this area. The existing 48" equalizer pipe between ponds JP -66 and 67 in
Duckwood Drive is required during large event storms to equalize the existing
storage in each pond. However, during small event storms where the ponding
areas function primarily for water quality purposes, the OR equalizer pipe is
not required. Therefore, it is proposed to construct a timber or concrete box
around the upstream end of the existing 48" RCP apron preventing low flows
from discharging directly from Pond JP -67 into Pond JP -66. The top of the box
will be located at elevation 876 which is 4' above the normal water level of
Page 6.
RPT49510
S�-
872. Therefore, once the water elevation exceeds 876 in each pond, the storm
water will flow between each pond in the 48" pipe.
Finally, landscaping, tree planting, and restoration will be used to min -
imine the impacts of the proposed project on neighboring properties. Proposed
landscaping will include honeysuckle bushes for screening on the south side of
Pond JP -67 abutting the town homes and continuation of the boulevard
landscaping along Duckwood Drive on the north side of JP -67.
EASEMENTS AND PERMITS
Storm sewer easements for Pond JP -67 are required from Parcel 013-01 (Part
of Lot 1, Blk. 1, Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition) in the SW 1/4 of Section 15
(see Figure No. 4). The proposed easterly edge of the easement on Parcel
013-01 has been designed to provide a buildable area along Denmark Avenue (see
Figure No. 4). The estimated easement area required for Parcel 013-01 is
listed below:
Parcel Number Required Easement Area
013-01 31,495 sq.ft.
Easements over Parcels 021-50 and 013-00 (Outlot D) have been previously
acquired from Dakota County over these tax forfeit properties. There
presently is a commitment from the property owner to dedicate the westerly 55'
of Parcel 013-01. The additional easement required over Parcel 013-01 will
have to be acquired.
No special permits would be required for the construction of this project.
Page 7.
RPT49510
3-5
COST ESTIMATE
A detailed construction cost estimate for the proposed project is pre-
sented in Appendix A. The estimated total project costs are summarized below:
PROJECT NO. 594 COST ESTIMATE
Storm Sewer Const./Mod. $72,360
Landscaping 18,70
TOTAL $91,130
The construction cost estimate includes contingencies and related over-
head but does not include any costs for easements which have not been deter-
mined at this time. Overhead costs are estimated at 251 and include legal,
administrative, and engineering costs.
ASSESSMENTS
No assessments are proposed to be levied as part of this project. All
parcels within the drainage areas of Ponds JP -66 and JP -67 have previously
been assessed trunk storm sewer.
Costs incurred as part of this project will be funded through the Storm
{later Utility Fund.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report June 19, 1990
Public Hearing July 17, 1990
Approve Plans and Specifications August 7, 1990
Open Bids/Award Contract August 21, 1990
Complete Construction Fall, 1990
Assessment Hearing N/A
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes N/A
RPT49510
Page 8.
5`�
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
POND JP -67 IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 594
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
I. STORM SEVER
Clear and grub
Common Excavation
18" RCF Storm Sewer
Construct Outlet Weir
Construct Control MH
Class 2 rip rap
II. LANDSCAPING
Seed w/topsoil
Staked Sod w/topsoil
Trees, shrubs, & landscaping
materials
RPT49510
Unit
Unit Price
Quantity
Total
L.S.
$1,000.00
1
$ 1,000
C.Y.
5.00
9,000
45,000
L.F.
32.00
65
2,080
L.S.
2,800.00
1
2,800
Each
2,000.00
1
2,000
C.Y.
30.00
75
2.250
Total
+5Z Contingency
+25Z Legal, Admin., & Engineering
TOTAL PART I STORM SEVER ...........
$55,130
2,756
$57,886
14.474
$72,360
Acre $1,000.00 1.30 $ 1,300
S.Y. 2.50 1,200 3,000
Each 200.00 29
Total
+5Z Contingency
+252 Legal, Admin.. & Engineering
TOTAL PART II LANDSCAPING ..........
Page 9.
S-5
10.000
$14,300
715
$15,015
3,755
$18,770
TOWN CENTRE 70 FIRST ADDITION
\5 OUTLOT E
DRAINAGE S UTILITY
` EASEMENT
POND JP -66
�'� ,� •\ " _ _ _ — NWL°8720 1
•\ HWL=880.0
12=le�w DRi
\\ : • tea N., \ /
F -A
16
'0UF
POND JP47 Or --
• � I � t NWl■872.0) � rl
HWL=880.0 �l '",
021-50'�� -'r,-, /r r _ _,\ ♦�_� ' ♦♦
l
PILOT ; K� N08 -HEIGHTS "FIRSTBLOCK I
256,59
-'-- - 5S
tx M2. EdCE lo�Lwuw'•
TOWNHOME ,
HIDDEN OAKS
Crestwood Lane
124.64
42"
FIGURE NO. 2
Pond JP -67
EXISTING CONDITIONS
04
TOWN
\,N
CENTRE 70
FIRST ADDITIONOi`I__ OUTLOT E
Existing --,
Concrete Walk
Proposed -
Boulevard Trees o
40' O.C.
(Behind future
and Existing Walk)
Proposed
Timber or Conc
Outlet Structure
020-50
Existing Edge
of Woods
(To Remain)
Q
Lam..
0C r
Cli
C II
N II
�\
Fu idewalk Il
to Rip Rap
on Dike
( 72 5)
®its!
5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Proposed Honeysuckle 1
Shrubs for Screening
LEGEND
NWL = NORMAL WATER LEVEL
HWL = HIGH WATER LEVEL
Pond
Proposed
Project
NWL •
HWL ::0 •
1 2 3 4 5 013-01
HIDDEN OAKS
Crestridgo Lane
JP -67
Conditions
N o. 594
57
`k
6
Proposed
I Storm
1 -Sewer
7
1�
1 10
I
1
1 11
I �
15
0 100 200
Scale in feet
14
40 0. Bonestroo Engineers & Architects
Rosene
Anderllk &
Associates St. Psul, Minnesota
Date: July 1990
Comm. 49510 fig• No. 3
TOWN ()
�0GENTRE 70 >
a Q
East ADMON
OUTLOT E
II �
JP -66 '
I 1
♦ � I 1 1
1 1
r
T D —
13-00 ( 6
`« r'
55'
020-50 `
1
t
1
1
1 10
' 1 1
r 1
4 1
2
3 4 5 013—D1
3 5 6 2 11
5 6 1 � s 1
HIDDEN a4KS 124.84' 14
® Required Easement Area ' C restri d g Lane
15
N
0 100 200
Scale in feet
Pond JP -67
Required Easement Area
Project No. 594
Bonestroo Engineers &Arch►fects
Rosene
Ander(fk &
Associates St. Psut, Minnesota
Date: June 1990
Comm. 49510 Fig. No.
0 100 200
Scale in feet
Rip Rop
High Water Level = 880.0
Normal Water Level = 872.0
42"
R�ttnm = RR7 n �
POND SECTION A -A
Ex Tree Proposed
Blvd. Tree
Id PL Proposed
� Screening
High Water Level =' 880.0
c
Normal Water Level = 872.0
o�
m
Bottom = 862.0
POND SECTION D-8
Pond JP -67
Proposed Pond
Cross Sections
City Project No. 594
S1�
L
Bonestroo Engineers d Archltsets
Rosene
Andorlik &
Associates
St. Paul, MPnnesota
Date: July 1990
Comm. 49510 Fig. No. 5
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990, City Council Meeting
x7t'OODLAI\rnS NORTH ADDN
C. Project 596, Woodlands North Addition -Street ed Utilities. -On
Ont and ordered a public
19, the Council
received the feasibility report for the above-referen throuhg improvement
is a copy of that
hearing to be held on July 17. Enclosed on pages _(a(
feasibility report for the Council's information and staff's
presentation aper and sent
of this proposed project. All notices have been published in the legal newsp
to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this concerns thaP mayed arise during this
Staff will be available to address any questionso
public hearing process.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To
close
(Streets e& bl litie hearing
and
approve/deny Project 596. Woodlands North Addition
preparation of detailed plans
and specifications along with
approved, authorize the
sa
acquisition of easements through condemnation if necessary..
FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ESTI?!ATE OF COST
FOR
THE WOODLANDS WORTH
V71LITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROOJECT NO. 596
EAGAN ?M
JIINE, 1990
rtp�
-citVoFcagan
3EK1 PIL07 KNOE ROAD
EAGAN WNNESO7A 55121-1S7
PHONE (t121454-8100
FAX (t'2,454-8363
June 22, 1990
HONORABLE MAYOR
CITY OF EAGAN
3830 PILOT KNOB
EAGAN MN 55122
AND COUNCIL
ROAD
TH•DM,AS EGAN
neyca
DAVID K GUS,Ar501,
PAW.LA, WCOCA
TIM PAW-EN—y'
THEODORE WAC- ER
Counoi me'»e5
THOMAS HEDGES
Cry AcMn5;ra,.--,
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
Cay Clerk
Re: City Project No. 596
The Woodlands North
Utility and Street Improvements
Dear Mayor and City Council:
Enclosed is the feasibility report for The Woodlands North -
Utility and Street Improvements. Included is a preliminary cost
estimate and preliminary assessment roll for the project.
Staff will be available to discuss and present the details of the
project to the Council and other interested public at a time
convenient to the Council.
in e I y yo s
_chael P. Foertsch, P. E.
ssistant City Engineer
Enclosures
MPF/jj
I hereby certify that the attached plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a
ly
duegistered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State
xnesota.
Date: Z� Cly Reg. No.
THE LONE OAK TREE. .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Equal Opportunity,'AOirir at!% Act i o) Employer
FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ESTIMATE COST
THE WOODLANDS NORTH
PROJECT 596
SCOPE
This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer,
watermain, storm sewer, streets and street lights to serve the
duplex and single family homes of The Woodlands North. These are
62 duplex style homes located in the southwest corner of Kost Road
and Elrene Road. Twelve single family homes will be located along
two cul-de-sacs connecting to Elrene Road and abutting the
Woodlands Addition and Windtree Addition to the south. Refer to
Figure Number 1 for a general layout of the project location,.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMLXENDATIONS
This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in
ccn.piance with the Faster Street Plan, the Comprehensive Sewer
Policy Plan, Water Supply and Distribution Plan, the Comprehensive
Stcr- Water Management Plan and Water Quality Management Plan for
the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be
carries: ort as one contract or combined with a similar type project
to be constructed at the same time.
DISCUSSION
The following is a discussion of how utilities, streets and street
lights will be provided to service the areas. The preliminary
layout for the steets was provided by the developer with the
preliminary plat submittal.
A. Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer to serve the duplex homes
abutting Kost Road will be provided by 8" diameter PVC sewer
laterals that connect to the proposed 8" sanitary sewer stubs
at the south right-of-way of Kost Road constructed as part of
Project 589, Elrene and Kost Road Streets & Utilities.
Sanitary sewer service for the two single-family cul-de-sacs
will be provided by 8" PVC laterals that connect to the
proposed stubs constructed as part of Project 589.
It is also proposed to extend an 8" sanitary sewer in Trails
End Road from the proposed stub constructed as part of Project
589. The sanitary sewer in Trails End Road would be provided
to the south plat line of the duplex area of the proposed
Woodlands North development.
Preliminary locations for the sanitary sewer lines are shown
on Figures 2 and 3.
Sanitary sewer to serve the duplex area and the single-family
area of the Woodlands North development will connect to an
existing 12" trunk sanitary sewer in Mike Collins Drive. The
12" trunk sanitary sewer was designed to accommodate flows
from these areas.
The 1988 Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan estimated that the
Woodlands North area would contain 37 +/- acres of R-4,
Multiple Zoning, along Elrene Road; and 21 +/- acres of D-1,
Single Family Residential area. The preliminary plat that was
approved by the City Council on June 5, 1990, contains 15
acres of D-1, Single Family Residential; 17 acres of D -II,
Mixed Residential (0-6 units per acre); and 25 acres of D -III,
Mixed Residential (0-12 units per acre), for the future
apartment area. Based on the average wastewater flows from
the 1988 Comprehensive Plan, the Woodlands North Development
will have less of an impact on the sanitary sewer system than
the typical development would have produced for this area.
Previous sanitary sewer assessments to this area include:
Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer Trunk - Project 58
Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sewer Trunk - Project 525
Sanitary Sewer Trunk - Project 58
Some of the parcels within this project will have additional
costs assessed against them as part of proposed Project 589.
B. Water Main - As part of this project, it is proposed to
construct water main to serve the duplex area abutting Kost
Road. The water main will loop through the area along the main
road and connect to existing 6" water main stubs at Kost Road
constructed as part of Project 589. There will also be a 6"
water main connection to this loop from the water main on Kost
Road through the cul-de-sac in the center of the duplex area.
It is also proposed to extend an 8" water main in Trails End
Road from the proposed stub constructed as part of Project
589. The water main in Trails End Road would be provided to
the south plat line of the duplex area of Woodlands North.
Water main for the two single-family cul-de-sacs that connect
to Elrene Road shall be by 6" water main that connects to
water main stubs constructed as part of Project 589.
Preliminary locations for the water main lines are shown on
Figures 2 and 3.
The water main for the Woodlands North development is located
in the intermediate level pressure zone and will experience
static pressure of approximately 75 p.s.i.
Previous assessments to this area for water main include:
Water Trunk - Project 58
Lateral Benefit Water Trunk - Project 58
So:ae of the parcels within this project will may have
additional costs assessed against thea. as part of proposed
Project 589.
C. SERVICES - Sanitary sewer and water main services will be
constructed to a point 15 feet beyond the property line.
Sanitary sewer service lines shall be 4" diameter and water
service lines shall be 1" diameter. Each unit of the duplex
homes shall have a separate sewer and water service.
D. STORUM SEWER - The northerly ends of the loop road through
proposed Blocks 3 and 4 shall drain into catch basins
canstructed as part of Project 589. The remainder of the
stcrn sewer system for the duplex area shall drain to proposed
Pond A, a stcrr water pond at the southwest corner of Block
3.
The store water pond is not shown on the City's Storrs Water
Management Plan but is needed to improve water quality and to
reduce flow to an overburdened 33" storm sewer line located
in the Wescott Hills Revised 3rd Addition. An outlet for Pond
A is proposed to be provided with this project along Trails
End Road. Also, storm sewer to drain Trails End Road at the
south end of the improved street is also being proposed.
Preliminary locations for the storm sewer system to serve the
duplex area are shown on Figure #r4.
The duplex area of the Woodlands North development is located
in District E of the City's Storm Water Management Plan.
Figure 5 shows a layout of the storm sewer drainage system,
including proposed and future ponds and drainage boundaries
for the southern portion of District E. The four ponds
identified as Ponds A, B, C, and D have drainage areas well
defined by the local topography. The ponds will drain to the
33" storm sewer line located in the Wescott Hills Revised 3rd
(-0S
Addition which drains to waterbodies classified as nutrient
traps and are designated as Ponds EP -2 and EP -1. All four
ponds will only need to be required to meet the minimum water
quality criteria since the downstream waterbodies are
classified as nutrient traps. The four ponds shall be
designed to have a minimum size of 0.4 acres and an average
depth of 4 feet in order to obtain an efficient performance
for the treatment and detention of nutrients.
Listed below are the specifics for each of the ponding areas:
( DIRECT I I
I I POND ( WET
I
I I I
i DRAINAGE I BOTTOM I NroMAL
I *ION ( STORAGE I STORAGE
INUTRIENT
I PNOSPNOPUS I I
I AREA I Or ( WATER
I WATER I VOLUME ( VOLUME
I REMOVAL
I CONCENTRATION I I
POWO 1 (in Acres) ( POND I LEVEL
I LEVEL 10n Ac. Ft.)1(In. Ac. Ft.)
I =
I ppb I OUTFLOW 1
I
POW: A 1
I
16.4
I I I i
1 874 I 978.0 ( 682.2 1
I
3.2
I
I 2.0
I I
1 60.2 (
169
I i
1 2.1 i
FUIUPE P'N^ B 1
I
14.8
I I I
1 664 1 + 1 + 1
i
3.0
I
I 1.6
I I
1 61.0 1
185
I I
( 3.5••
rUtURE POW; C(
I
12.6
I I I
I 645 I I I
I
2.5
I
I 1.5
1 i
1 62.1 i
160
I I
1 2.0 1
rUTUPr PO4. e 1
14.5
I I I
( 878 I I • I
3.0
I
1 1.8
I I
1 61.2 I
184
I I
1 2.0 1
+ to be dete-erined when the a-eas develop
+• CLM!ative flor that includes ovtflow (rm re•� D
A minimal amount of storm sewer construction will be required
with this project to serve the two cul-de-sacs in the single-
family residential portion of the Woodlands North development.
Two other City projects will be providing the trunk and
lateral storm sewer system to serve the two cul-de-sacs. City
Project 585, West Publishing 3rd Addition, is proposed to
construct a trunk storm sewer line from Pond JP -16 to Pond JP -
14. The alignment of the storm sewer line is proposed to
follow the cul-de-sac in Block 2 so only catch basins and
catch basin leads will be needed to drain this cul-de-sac.
Preliminary lcoations for the storm sewer system to serve the
single-family area of the Woodlands North are shown on Figure
6.
Storm sewer in the cul-de-sac in Block 1 shall pick up the
street run-off and connect to a storm sewer stub that will be
provided with Project 589.
The developer of the Woodlands North has requested that the
City raise the normal water level of Ponds JP -14 and JP -33 to
improve water quality and the aesthetics of the ponds. Based
on the vegetation and trees surrounding the ponds, the
developer would prefer that the NWL be set at elevation 837.0.
The outlets for the two ponds would have to be reconstructed
and all trees below the NWL would need to be removed.
Previous assessments to this area for storm sewer include:
Storm Water Trunk - Project 525
Storm Sewer Trunk Upgrade - Project 525
Some of the parcels within this project will have additional
costs assessed against them as part of proposed Project 589.
E. STREET - Street construction for both areas shall consist of
28' wide bituminous streets constructed to a 7 ton residential
design thickness based on existing soil conditions. The
proposed street construction shall include aggregate base,
bituminous surfacing, concrete curb and gutter and restoration
of boulevards. Landscaping of cul-de-sac islands shall be by
others. Additionally, included is the 1st Phase construction
of a portion of Trails End Road. This will consist of
constructing a 32' wide bituminous street from the
intersection of Trails End Road and Kost Road to a point 280'
south thereof. The west � of this new roadway will be
constructed as a rural section road. The east k of this road
will be constructed as a typical 7 ton road residential street
using B618 concrete curb and gutter.
Figure 7 shows the proposed street construction for the duplex
area of Blocks 3 and 4 of The Woodlands North and the
upgrading of Trails End Road from Kost Road to the south plat
line of Block 3.
Figure 8 shows the proposed street construction for the two
cul-de-sacs to serve the single-family residential area of
Blocks 1 and 2.
Some of the parcels within this project will have additional
costs assessed against them as part of proposed Project 589.
F. STREET LIGHTING - Street lighting shall be 100 watt high
pressure sodium luminaire. The type luminaires and the
spacing of the street lights shall be according to the City
of Eagan's standards for street lights.
EASEMENTSIRIGHT-OF-RAY
The right-of-way for the proposed streets will be dedicated
with The Woodlands North final plat.
Permanent easements for drainage and utility, ponding,
ingress -egress and trailways shall be dedicated on the plat
Val
of The Woodlands North in accordance with the conditions of
the Development Agreement Contract for the proposed
development.
COST ESTIMATES
Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located
at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is shown
below.
A. Sanitary Sewer $ 124,160.40
B. Water Main 104,408.85
C. Services 82,029.68
D. Storm Sewer 79,675.05
E. Streets 204,226.40
F. Street Lights 10,237.50
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 604,737.88
The total estimated project cost is $604,737.88 which includes
contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are
estimated at 30% and include legal, administration,
engineering and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS
Assessments for the improvements under Project 596 are
proposed to be levied against the benefitted properties on a
per lot basis with the exception of Parcels 10-83700-011-02
and 10-83700-014-02. These two parcels will be assessed on
a lineal footage basis for the cost of constructing the
improvements on Trails End Road. The assessments that will
be on a per lot basis will be assessed differently within two
areas of The Woodlands North development. Lots within Block
1 and 2, the cul-de-sac area, will be assessed to cover all
costs associated with improvements in that area. Likewise,
the 62 lots of Block 3 and 4, the duplex area, shall be
assessed for the cost of those improvements. A preliminary
assessment roll is included at the back of this report in
Appendix B. The assessments will be spread over a period of
5 years unless otherwise specified by the City Council at the
public hearing. The interest rate will be based upon the bond
sale used to finance these improvements.
ASSESSMENT AREA
SW ; - Section 13
- Unplatted Property:
- Parcel 021-29
NW - Section 13
Unplatted Property:
- Parcel 021-29
Platted Property:
- Wescott Garden Lots
Lot 1, Block 1
Lot 2, Block 1
Lot 1, Block 4 (Parcel 010-04)
Lot 1, Block 4 (Parcel 011-04)
Lot 2, Block 4
Lot 4, Block 4
Lot 1, Block 2 (Parcel 011-02)
Lot 1, Block 2 (Parcel 014-02)
REVENUE
The project is proposed to be financed 100% through special
assessment's to 'A. -,he benefitted property.
ITEC+:
COST
ASSMT REVENUE
CITY SHARE
Sanitary Sewer
$124,160.40
$124,160.40
-0-
Water Hain
104,408.85
104,408.85
-0-
Serr.�ices
82,029.68
82,029.68
-0-
Storm Sewer
79,675.05
79,675.05
-0-
Streets
204,226.40
204,226.40
-0-
Streetlights
10,237.50
10,237.50
-0-
TOTAL
PROJECT SCHEDULE
$604,737.88
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans & Specifications
Open Bids/Award Contract
Substantial Conpletion of Construction
Conplete Construction
Assessment Hearing
First Pay-ment Due with Taxes
$604,737.88 -0-
June 19, 1990
July 17, 1990
August, 1990
September, 1990
November, 1990
Spring, 1991
Fall, 1991
May, 1992
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
THE WOODLANDS NORTH
PROJECT 596
SANITARY SE16'ER
1. Duplex Area
2,620
l.f.
8" PVC
Sanitary Sewer in place @$16.00/l.f.
$41,920.00
16
each
4' Std.
MH incl/cstg @ $950/ea.
17,100.00
80
l.f.
4' Std.
MH in excess of 8' @$75/l.f.
6,000.00
3
each
Connect
to exist. 8" San. Sewer @$250/ea.
750.00
62
each
4" x 8"
PVC Wye in place @$50/ea.
3,100.00
31
C.Y.
Rock stabilization
below pipe @$10/C.Y.
310.00
Subtotal $69,180.00
5% Contingencies S 3.459.00
+30% Legal, Fiscal, Eng. & Bond Interest $21,791.70
TOTAL SANITARY SEVER (AREA 1) $94,430.70
2. Cul -De -Sac Areas
790
l.f.
8" PVC
Sanitary Sewer in place @$16/l.f.
$12,640.00
6
each
4' Std.
PLS: incl/cstg @$950/ea.
5,700.00
30
l.f.
4' Std.
MH in excess of 8' @$75/l.f.
2,250.00
2
each
Connect
to exist. 8" sanitary sewer @$250/ea.
500.00
12
each
4" x 8"
PVC Wye in place @$50/ea.
600.00
9
C.Y.
Rock stabilization,
below pipe @$10/C.Y.
90.00
Subtotal $21,780.00
5% Contingencies $ 1,089.00
+30 Legal, Fiscal, Eng. & Bond Interest S 6,860.70
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER (AREA 2) $29,729.70
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER (AREA 1 & 2) $124.160.40
WATER ?iAIN
1.
Duplex Area
430
l.f.
8" CL 52 DIP Water Main @$17/l.f.
$ 7,310.00
2,610
l.f.
6" DIP Water Main @$14/l.f.
36,540.00
2
each
8" Gate Valve and Box @$425/each
850.00
8
each
6" Gate Valve and Box @$375/each
3,000.00
8
each
Hydrants @$1,050/each
8,400.00
3,400
lbs.
Fittings @$1.50/lbs.
5,100.00
4
each
Connect to exist. 6" DIP Water Main @$200/ea.
800.00
35
C.Y.
Rock Stabilization below pipe @$10/C.Y.
S 350.00
f
0
Subtotal
+54 Contingencies
+304 Legal, Fiscal, Erg., & Bond Interest
TOTAL WATER MAID (AREA 1)
2. Cul -De Sac Area
740 l.f. 6" DIP Water Main @$14/l.f.
2 each Hydrants @$1,050/each
800 lbs. Fittings 0$1.50/lbs.
8 C.Y. Rock Stabilization below pipe @$10/C.Y.
2 each Connect to exist 6" DIP Water main @$200/each
Subtotal
t5% Ccntingencies
+31'4 Legal, Fiscal, Eng., & Bond Interest
TOTAL WATER MAI? (AF..EA 2 )
TOTAL WATER MAIN (AREAS 1 & 2)
,SERVICES
1. D-aplex Area
2,780 I , f . 4" PVC Sarita:-} Sewer Services @$9.50/1.f.
2.61C l.f. 1" Copper Water Service @$8.00../i. f .
62 each: 1" Corporation Stop @$20/each
62 each 1" Garb Stop @$75/each
3C C.Y. Rock Stabilization below pipe @$10/C.Y.
Subtotal
+54 Contingencies
+308 Legal, Fiscal, Erg., & Bond Interest
TOTAL SERVICES (AREA 1)
$ 62,350.00
3,117.50
X19.640.25
L 85,107.75
$ 10,360.00
2,100.00
1,200.00
80.00
400.00
$ 14,140.00
S 707,0
$ 14,847.00
S 4.454.00
$ 19,301 10
$104,408.85
$ 26,410.00
20,880.00
1,240.00
4,650.00
30.00
$ 53,480.00
S 2.674.Q0
$ 56,154.00
$ 16.846.20
S 73.000.20
2. Cul -De -Sac Area
310
l.f.
4" PVC Sanitary Sewer Service @$9.50/l.f.
$ 2,945.00
310
l.f.
1" Copper Water Service @$8.00/l.f.
2,480.00
12
each
1" Corporation Stop @$20/each
240.00
12
each
1" Curb Stop @$75/each
900.00
5
C.Y.
Rock Stabilization below pipe @$10/C.Y.
50.00
21"
RCP
Subtotal
$ 6,615.00
7
each
+5% Contingencies
S 330.75
with Cstg. @$780/each
5,460.00
4
$ 6,945.75
CE Manhole @$1,000/each
4,000.00
+30% Legal, Fiscal, Eng., & Bond Interest
S 2.083.73
Std.
Manhole @$1,000/each
TOTAL SERVICES (AREA 2)
S 9.029.48
each
12"
TOTAL SERVICES (AREAS 1 & 2)
S 82.029.68
STORM SKER
1. Duplex Area
300
l.f.
12"
RCP
Stora Sewer @$19/l.f.
$ 5,700.00
435
l.f.
15"
RCP
Stora Sewer @$20/l.f.
8,700.00
60
l.f.
16"
RCP
Storm Sewer @$23/1.f.
15,640.00
290
l.f.
21"
RCP
Storm Sewer @$25/l.f.
7,250.00
7
each
Std.
CB
with Cstg. @$780/each
5,460.00
4
each
CE Manhole @$1,000/each
4,000.00
2
each
Std.
Manhole @$1,000/each
2,000.00
1
each
12"
RCP
Flared End Section @$450/each
450.00
1
each
15"
RCP
Flared End Section 0$450/each
450.00
1
each
21"
RCP
Flared End Section @$550/each
550.00
1
each
Connector to Existing MR @$200/each
200.00
Subtotal $ 50,400.00
+5% Contingencies ,$ 2.520.00
$ 52,920.00
ON Legal, Fiscal, Eng., & Bond Interest 5 15.876.00
TOTAL STORM SEVER (AREA 1) $ 68,796.00
2. Cul -De -Sac Area
60
l.f.
12" RCP
Stora Sewer @$19/l.f.
$ 1,140.00
150
l.f.
15" RCP
Stora Sewer @$20/l.f.
3,000.00
1
each
Std. CB
with Cstg. @$780/each
780.00
1
each
CB Ma^hole @$1,000/each
1,000.00
1
each
Std. frui
with Cstg. @$1,000/each
1,000.00
1
each
12" RCP
Flared End Section @$450/each
450.00
3
each
Connect
to Existing storm sewer @$200/each
600.00
Subtotal $ 7,970.00
+5% Contingencies 398.50
$ 8,368.50
+30 Legal, Fiscal, Eng., & Bond Interest S 2.510.55
TOTAL
STORM
SEir-ER
(AREA
2)
$ 10
TOTAL
STORM
SEWER
(AREAS
1 & 2)
S 79.675.05
TREETS
1. Duplex Area
4,153
tons
Class 5 Aggregate Base @$7.00/ton
$29,071.00
884
tens
2331 Bit:.::inous Base Course @$11.50/ton
10,166.00
63_
tens
2341 Bituainous i:ear Course @$1-2.50/ton
7,887.50
79
tcns
Biti:,;--ous Material for Mix @$200/tor:
15,800.00
382
gal.
Tack Coat @$1.00/ton
382.00
5,520
1.f.
Su=cuntable Concrete C & G @$5.00/l.f.
27,600.00
1,495
l.f.
B -61E Conc. C & G @$5.00/l.f. (Center Islands)
7,475.00
8,520
s.f.
Concrete Sidewalk @$1.50/s.f.
12,780.00
4,970
s.v.
Sod with 4" topsoil @$1.80 s.y.
8.946.00
Subtotal $120,107.50
+5% Contingencies 6.005.38
$126,112.88
+30% Legal, Fiscal, Eng. & Bond Interest 37_,833.86
TOTAL STREETS (AREA 1) 5163,946.74
'� 3
2. Cul -De -Sac Areas
1,289 tors Class 5 Aggregate Base @$7.00/ton
284 tons 2331 Bituminous Base Course @$11.50/ton
213 tors 2341 Bituminous Wear Course @$12.50/ton
13 tons Bituminous Material for Mix @$200.00/ton
114 gal. Tack Coat @$1.00/gal.
1,295 l.f. Surmountable Conc. C & G @$5.00/l.f.
340 l.f. B-618 Conc. C & G @$5.00/l.f. (Center Islands)
2,038 s.y. Sod with 4" topsoil @$1.80/s.y.
Subtotal
+58 Contingencies
+30 Legal, Fiscal, Eng., & Bond Interest
TOTAL STREETS (AREA 2)
TOTAL STREETS (AREAS 1 & 2)
STREET LIGHTS
1. Duplex Area
7 each Street lights @$750/each
Subtotal
+5% Contingencies
+30 Legal, Fiscal, Eng., & Bond Interest
TOTAL STREET LIGHTS (AREA 1)
2. Cul -De -Sac Area
3 each Street lights @$750/each
Subtotal
+58 Contingencies
+30% Legal, Fiscal, Eng., & Bond Interest
TOTAL (AREA 2)
TOTAL STREET LIGHTS (AREAS 1 & 2)
$ 9,023.00
3,266.00
2,662.50
2,600.00
114.00
6,475.00
1,700.00
S. 40
$29,508.90
S 1.475.45
$30,984.35
9.295.31
$4027
5204.22_ 26 40
$ 5,250.00
$ 5,250.00
S 262.50
$ 5,512.50
S 1.653.75
6 7.166.25
$ 2,250.00
$ 2,250.00
S 112.50
$ 2,362.50
S 708.75
)71.25
$10$10.._. 23
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
THE WOOD:Ah'DS FORTS
PROJECT 596
A , SANITARY SE;•'ER
Parcel Costrwet Total Assessment
Block 1, Lots
1-5
$ 2,477.48
$ 12,387.38
Block 2, Lots
1-7
2,477.48
17,342.33
Block 3, Lots
1-38
1,409.91
53,576.69
Block 4, Lots
1-24
1,409.91
33,837.91
10-011-02
1-2-.
4,729.58
4,729.58
10-014-02
2,286.52
2.286.52
TOTAL $ 124,160.40
B. EATER PAIN
Parcel
Cost/Lot
Total Assessment
Tlcck 1, Lots
1-5
$ 1,608.43
$ 8,042.13
Block 2, Lots
1-7
1,608.43
11,258.98
Block 3, Lots
l --'-E
1,245.95
47,346.02
Block 4. Lots
1-2-.
1,245.95
29,902.75
IC--C'-`-C2
5,297.78
5,297.78
2,561.21
_ _ 2.561.21
TOTAL
$ 104,408.85
C. S70R.M SEVER
Parcel
Cost/Lot
Total Assessment
Block 1, Lots
1-5
$ 906.59
$ 4,532.94
Block 2, -Lots
1-7
906.59
6,346.11
Block 3, Lots
1-38
1,055.34
40,103.04
Block 4, Lots
1-24
1,055.34
25,328.24
10-011-02
2,268.17
2,268.17
10-014-02
1,096.55
1,096.55
TOTAI.
79 675.05
D. SERVICES
Parcel
Cost/Lot
Total Assessment
Block 1, Lots
1-5
$ 752.46
$ 3,762.28
Block 2, Lots
1-7
752.46
5,267.20
Block 3, Lots
1-38
1,177.42
44,741.96
Block 4, Lots
1-24
1,177.42
28.255,08
TOTAL $2,029.68
�5
E. STREETS
Parcel
Block 1, Lots 1-5
Block 2, Lots 1-7
Block 3, Lots 1-38
Block 4, Lots 1-24
10-011-02
10-014-02
TOTAL
F, STREET LIGHTS
Parcel
Block 1, Lots 1-5
Block 2, Lots 1-7
Block 3. Lots 1-38
Block 4, Lots 1-24
TOTAL
Parcel San.
Sewer
Cost/Lot
$ 3,356.64
3,356.64
2,561.30
2,561.30
3,469.02
1,677.10
Cost/Lot
$ 255.94
255.94
115.58
115.58
TOTAL ASSESSMENTS
SUMMARY
Total Assessment
$ 16,783.19
23,496.47
97,329.49
61,471.20
3,469.02
1,677.10
S 204,226.40
Total Assessment
$ 1,279.69
1,791.56
4,392.22
2,774.03
S 10.237.50
Water Storm Services Streets Street Total
Lights Assessment
Per Lot
Si,., Section 13
(Proposed Block 1, Lots 1-5)
$2,477.48 $1,608.43 $
K*a,-, Section 13
Wescott Garden Lots, Block 4, Lot 4
(Proposed Block 2, Lots 1-7)
906.59 $ 752.46 $3,356.64 $ 255.94.$ 9,357.54
$2,477.48 $1,608.43 $ 906.59 $ 752.46 $3,356.64 $ 255.94 $ 9,357.54
Wescott Garden Lots, Block 1, Lots 1 & 2, Block 4, Lots 1 &2
(Proposed Block 3, Lots 1-38)
$1,409.91 $1,245.95 $1,055.34 $1,177.42 $2,561.30 $ 115.58 $ 7,565.50
14
Parcel San. Water Stors Services Etreets treet Total
Sewer Lights AssessWent
r Lot
Wescott Garden Lots, Block 1, Lots 1 & 2
(Proposed Block 4, Lots 1-24)
$1,409.91 $1,245.95 $1,055.34 $1,177.42 $2,561.30 $ 115.58 $ 7,565.50
Wescott Garden Lots, Block 2, Lot 1
011-02 $4,729.58 $5,297.78 $2,268.17 ---- $3,469.02 ---- $15,764.55
014-02 $2,286.52 $2,561.21 $1,069.55 ---- $1,677.10 ---- $ 7,594.38
2
m
I I vJW%.16 Lmvti.Q461vII
0 200 400
scale in feet
city of eagan 'Woodlands Forth DATE
PUBLIC FIG. * 1
� Location Plan JUNE 1990
4, WORKS
DEPARTMEN City Project No. 596
OTT
7 /
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
'_ EXIST. WATERMAIN
WM WATERMAIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED
UNDER PROAL 596
w WATERMAIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED
UNDER PROs. 589
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DE PARTME
EX. 12- SAN SFwFR
o&r4oT
4
THE WOODLANDS NORTH
WATERMAIN &SANITARY SEWER
PROJECT 596
Z`�
11
0 100 200
DATE
NE 1990 FIG. * 2
S� ®
10-01400-013-01
0
o:
w
M
03 �s W
KOST ROAD
'_ EXIST. WATERMAIN
WM WATERMAIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED
UNDER PROAL 596
w WATERMAIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED
UNDER PROs. 589
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DE PARTME
EX. 12- SAN SFwFR
o&r4oT
4
THE WOODLANDS NORTH
WATERMAIN &SANITARY SEWER
PROJECT 596
Z`�
11
0 100 200
DATE
NE 1990 FIG. * 2
F
EX,1611 watermain
L11
N
0 100 200
1;0-
0
�O
Ex, 9" ScHiory
Sewer
city Of eagan THE WOODLANDS NORTH PATE:
PUBLIC WATERMAIN & SANITARY SEWER JUNE 1990 FIG. # 3
$ WORKS PROJECT 596
DEPARTMENT
8 0
M,
SEIA SEC 11,727,H'La
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
I •'� L0114S— T 1 MUMr.1' •o !•�- .rr �.�•� � �� 7fr—� •
is
..1 r2✓ OTT
wHI LSAbD
hpR H • �., �� 11 I
,. • 4
1
�•� �� r� r N r 1. ■ '•=S�y
•••• r ;`;,, �.w� :f'�� � .o.ra«.�f ■. I � t �� KOST ROAD
r
00
000 g, to
Vol
iVa / • 011-02 ••• % • 70(ar
i
•
• • LJ
0 0 ( • w Is
•
z»n • � ff4.n 0 I 0 • CC,
• Q • J
%fi ••• W
POND C a o1a-o�z �S► 014-02 POND A y0 •� I
G'0 � I
I
• 010-04 I
•
r' I •
I Z0
POND Q POND B I •Q� �►
FUTURE STORM SEWERS ••� • y 0x_04
•
031-03 041'03 •
DRA I AGE AREA
03.1.0 1 NDARY
OM2 -03
P — 59 o3 -03
—t•------- --
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
21 P, DE PARTME
P-14
THE WOODLANDS NORTH DATE
STORM SEWER DRAINAGE SYSTEM FIG 0 5
JUNE 1990
PROJECT 596
STORM SEWER TO BE
CONSTRJCTED UNDER
WEST PUK Sm;NG 3RD ADO.
CITY PfiOJ 585 � \ \ 18'
BY PROD
t?G 589
T <0� 0 100 200 ,
STS 27 6 C
q
022-29
POND JP-14 sr 7
NWL = 83! 5 PROPOSE.^. R Cn
HWL = 854 S?On"d S�hER ` 18
ST 9
�ELOC O `\ �Q BY 585 PROJ
X.15tiOs �o
a EX. L. S. BY PROJ
Q / EX. FM _ J /� 589
2 3 4 \ SEX 18
5 PON JP- 33 :} 5 \
N W a_ = 832
6
HWL= 854 STOR': EVER
7
4
8
3 15
BLOCK (
7 6
W INDT RE E ADDITION 5
city Of eagan THE WOODLAI":DS NOr,TH DATE
PUBLIC STORM SEWER JUNE 1990 FIG.* 6
WORKS PROJECT 696
DEPARTMEN
W3
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
�m
WESCOTT SQ.
32'F-
4�4�
0
T40�
KOST
10-01400-013-01
C<l
0
cr_
Lli
z
Ld
KOST ROAD
TO BE UPGRADED Uj
BY PROJ 589
ROAD
city of eagan'
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTME
ray
OUTLOT A
THE WOODLANDS NORTH
STREETS
PROJECT 596
M6
N
0 100 200
DATE
FIG #7
JUNE 1990
i
G . rmug;==
0 100 200
4
7 � ,
5 2�
ELRENE ROAD
a'1 TO BE UPGRADED
BY PROJ 589
�•
00
B LOC K Q O�� 5o Row �► \ �o
3 s 2 \ '
T,y X
\�
BLOCK'(D 2 1
10-013-00 - 021 -a 9
City of eagan . THC WOODLANDS 140P,75-11
DATE
PUBLIC STREETS FIG. sa
WORKS JUNE 1990
DEPARTMENT�� 5�6
J�
N I -
5tl
........... .
...............
............. .
.............
...............
........... .
a .
.............................
.................
...................
.................
...............
...........
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
.............
......... . ...
0 ............ ....................
............. ........... .........
............ ........... .........
............. ......
ol ...... (
..... .....................
....... .....................
............
..................... I ............
.............. ......................
.............
..............
............................. ..................
................................................
............ ........
....................
...............
............
..........
O
O
. .........
ASSESSMENT PER LOT -
ASSESSMENT PER LINEAL FOOT
City of eagw THE WOODLANDS NORTH
r.nk PUBLIC ASSESSMENTS
lu;-am WORKS PROJECT 596
L= DEPARTMENT1
FIG *9
0
zui
W
W
KOST ROAD
.............
......... . ...
0 ............ ....................
............. ........... .........
............ ........... .........
............. ......
ol ...... (
..... .....................
....... .....................
............
..................... I ............
.............. ......................
.............
..............
............................. ..................
................................................
............ ........
....................
...............
............
..........
O
O
. .........
ASSESSMENT PER LOT -
ASSESSMENT PER LINEAL FOOT
City of eagw THE WOODLANDS NORTH
r.nk PUBLIC ASSESSMENTS
lu;-am WORKS PROJECT 596
L= DEPARTMENT1
FIG *9
ASSESSMENT PER LOT
�p�
\� t
10-01300-021-29
City Of eagan' THE W00CLANDO IlOr ll DATE
RAPUBLIC ASSESSMENTS FIG .#10
WORKS JUNE 1990
$ DEPARTMENT
a
g
Agenda Information 'Memo
July 17, 1990. City Council Meeting
HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE 3RD ADDN
D. Project 597, Hills of Stonebridge 3rd Addition - Trunk Storm Sewer --In response to
a petition submitted by the developer of the proposed Hills of Stonebridge 3rd Addition,
the staff prepared a detailed feasibility report to evaluate the trunk storm sewer
improvements associated with the development of this 3rd Addition. This feasibility report
was presented to the City Council on J e 19 with 4 formal public hearing being
scheduled for July 17. Enclosed on pages through s a copy of the feasibility
report for the Council's information and review during the public hearing presentation by
staff.
This particular project addresses the necessity for the acquisition and development of Pond
JP -27 located adjacent to and south of this development just north of Diffley Road. With
the continued development of our community, many times subdivisions have put a burden
on the City's storm sewer system to the extent that ponding easements had to be acquired
beyond the limits of the proposed development to accommodate the runoff associated with
that particular subdivision. Usually, the acquisition of the easements necessary for this
downstream pond acquisition has been the responsibility of the development. However,
this particular project is unique that while this development has dedicated the appropriate
storm ponding facilities within the limits of the 2nd Addition, it will inherently create a
ponding area upstream and to the south (JP -27) due to the fact that it will be developed
in a natural drainage way thereby restricting the amount of water and requiring it to be
detained in the upstreampondingarea (JP -27). The developer has indicated that he feels
it is not his obligation to acquire this pond as it is upstream of his development and no
water generated from this development will flow into that pond. However, the mere
development of this subdivision will require the acquisition and construction of this
ponding area which could be considered to be its responsibility.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected
property owners informing them of this public hearing. Staff N011 be available to address
this and any other issues associated with this improvement during the public hearing
process.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny Project 597, Hills
of Stonebridge 3rd Addition (Trunk Storm Sewer) and, if approved, authorize the
preparation of detailed plans and specifications along with acquisition of easements
through condemnation if necessary.
Report for
Hills of Stonebridge
3rd Addition
Trunk Storm Sewer
Project No. 597
Eagan, Minnesota
June 1990
File No. 49509
Attached is our report for Hills of Stonebridge 3rd Addition Trunk Storm
Sewer. Also included is a preliminary cost estimate and assessment roll.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss this report.
Sincerely,
BONEST 00, ROSENE, ERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mari: eanson
MAH:1
I hereby certify that this report was prepare
by me or under my direct supervision and tha
I am a duly Registered Profess 'onal Enginee
under the laws of t State of esota.
Mark A. Vlanson
Date: June 4, 1990 Reg. No. 14260
Lpproved b
4Dertment o,ffPuub ' c W&Vs
rate: C—�-� C1
I� 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 * 612-636-4600
Otto G Sonesm)o, P.E.
Keith A. Gordon. PE
lames R Maiano, PE
Thomas R. Ardersan, A.i A
Bones t roo
Robert W Rosene. P.E.
Richard W. Fester. PE.
Kenneth P Anderson, P.E.
Gary F. Rysanoer, Pc".
Joseph C. Anclerlik P.E.
Donato C. Bum dt PE
Mark R. Rohs RE
Mlles 8 Jensen, PE
Rosene
Marvin L. Sorvala, PE.
Richard E Turner, PE
Jerry A. Bourdon. PE
Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
Robert C Russek. A.I.A.
Thomas E. Angus, P.E.
L Philip Gravel III, PE,
Rene C. Piurnart A..I.A,
MAW
Anderlik &
James C. O!son, P.E.
Glenn R. C— °F
Teo K, Fieid. PE,
Michael T Rautmann. PE
Howard A. Sanford, P.E.
Danks J. Edgerton, RE
Agnes M. Ring, AIC.F.
Jerry D Pertzsch, P.E
Thomas E.
Robert R. Plefferle, PE
Mark A Sep, RE
Ceciiio Olive REAssociates
Robert G. Schunirht PE
David C Loskota, PE
Philip J. Caswell, PE
Charles A. Erikson
Susan M. Ebenin, C.P.A.
Thomas W. Peterson. PE
Lvwl Martinez. PE.
Lec M. Pawelsky
`
Michael C Lynch, PE.
Mark D. Wallis, P.E.
Hanar. M Olson
Engineers & Architects
June 1, 1990
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Hills of Stonebridge 3rd
Addition
Trunk Storm Sewer
Project No. 557
Our File No. 49509
OP gear Mayor and Council:
Attached is our report for Hills of Stonebridge 3rd Addition Trunk Storm
Sewer. Also included is a preliminary cost estimate and assessment roll.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss this report.
Sincerely,
BONEST 00, ROSENE, ERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mari: eanson
MAH:1
I hereby certify that this report was prepare
by me or under my direct supervision and tha
I am a duly Registered Profess 'onal Enginee
under the laws of t State of esota.
Mark A. Vlanson
Date: June 4, 1990 Reg. No. 14260
Lpproved b
4Dertment o,ffPuub ' c W&Vs
rate: C—�-� C1
I� 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 * 612-636-4600
HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE 3RD ADDITION
TRUNK STORM SEWER
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 597
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
SCOPE 2.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION 2•
FIGURE NO. 1 - LOCATION PLAN 3.
DISCUSSION 4.
STORM SEVER 4.
EASEMENTS AND PERMITS 5.
COST ESTIMATE 5.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED 6.
ASSESSMENTS 6.
REVENUE 6.
PROJECT SCHEDULE 7.
APPENDIX A - COST ESTIMATE S.
APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 9•
FIGURE NO. 2 - STORM SEWER LAYOUTS
FIGURE NO. 3 - TRUNK STORM SEVER ASSESSMENT AREAS
FIGURE NO. 4 - REVISED LOT LAYOUT (MAINTAIN OVERLAND DRAINAGE)
Page 1
RPT49509
HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE 3RD ADDITION
TRUNK STORM SEWER
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 597
SCOPE
This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer to Outlet
Pond JP -27 and the acquisition of a ponding easement for that pond. The
improvements will serve the Hills of Stonebridge 3rd Addition and surrounding
areas. The Hills of Stonebridge 3rd Addition is located northwest of the
intersection of Diffley Road (County Road 30) and Dodd Road (County Road 63).
The outlet for Pond JP -27 was sized r^ both minimize the ponding area of Pond
JP -27 and address environmental considerations.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accor-
dance with the objectives established in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan.
The project as presented is recommending a pond easement be acquired for Pond
JP -27. Alternatives were investigated other than acquiring the pond ease-
ment. One alternative considered maintaining the existing overland drainage
swale between Pond JP -27 and JP -53 while the other alternative considering
oversizirg the proposed storm sewer between Ponds JP -27 and JP -53. Figure 4
shows a proposed layout by the developer which maintains the existing overland
drainage. However, it's not recommended either alternative be considered due
to limitations in downstream ponding and storm sewers.
RPT49509
Page 2
_� ;�-•��+�/ '� {{$ ."Tei ���,t YS/� ,�^•
14 + LL�+�I+�! / ` � ,r..;s � •�. ,� + 'ice. y%� A'
Nor thvier,'':3
ark R ` ,� •' 'r
tea•, '
�J s
Diffle Rd.
� Rd 30
Co.
E„ 3
.,? ..ass „_ � .�..� • ....�..�.r
3
• ,� '; �.. 1' 'tib : ( j . ' �� � i
Project Location
0 2000 4000
Scale in feet
Hills of Stonebridge
3rd Addition
Location Plan
City Project No. 597
r} engin"ra QArommugm
Bonestroo
Rosene
Ci Anderlik d
Associates st, pawl, Minnesota
Date: June 1990 � No•
Comm. 49509 9• 1
3
DISCUSSION
Trunk Storm Sewer - Storm sewer herein provides for constructing a storm sewer
outlet for Pond JP -27. Storage and outflow requirements for Pond JP -27 were
determined as part of the Hills of Stonebridge Plat 2 trunk storm sewer design
(Project 581). At that time, the pond was designed (in conjunction with Pond
JP -53) with an effort to minimize its required storage volume and therefore
reduce the amount of land acquisition required. An outlet for Pond JP -27 was
not proposed under Project 581. The phasing of the Hills of Stonebridge Addi-
tions did not require it at that time.
Proposed grading plans for the Hills of Stonebridge 3rd Addition will re-
quire that the outlet for Pond JP -27 be constructed at this time since the
existing overland flow route will be eliminated. Pond JP -27 receives storm
water runoff from 65.5 acres south of Diffley Road and 36.5 acres north of
Diffley Road (See Figure 2). Design considerations based on a 100 year event
storm for Pond JP -27 in accordance with the recent update of the Comprehensive
Storm Sewer Plan and the feasibility report for Project No. 581 (Hills of
Stonebridge Plat 2) are listed below:
Drainage
Area NWL HWL Storage Outflow
Pond JP -27 102 ac. 896 902.5 23.4 ac.ft. 6.5 cfs
The storm sewer outlet for Pond JP -27 to JP -53 is proposed to be construc-
ted by the developer of Hills of Stonebridge 3rd Addition. However, the pond
easement required for Pond JP -27 will be acquired by the City in accordance
with the above design considerations. It should be noted to minimize pond
easement acquisition, it is proposed at this time not to incorporate wet
RPT49509
Page 4
volume requirements as part of the pond design. In the future, when the land
abutting Pond JP -27 is developed, water quality considerations will be re-
quired.
EASEMENTS AND PERMITS
As previously mentioned, a pond easement for Pond JP -27 is required. The
land area below the existing normal water level elevation of 896.0 is 2.3
acres. The land area between elevations 896.0 and the proposed high water
level of 902.5 is 3.1 acres. Therefore, the total pond area incorporates 5.4
acres. It should be noted Pond JP -27 is included on the Wetland Inventory
Maps for Eagan and is also under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engi-
neers. As a result, a permit may be required from the Army Corps of Engineers
due to the grading which will block the overland drainage route between Pond
JP -27 and JP -53.
COST ESTIMATE
Detailed cost estimate for easement acquisition for Pond JP -27 is pre-
sented in Appendix A and is summarized below:
PROJECT NO. 597 COST ESTIMATES
Easement Acquisition $137,190
TOTAL..................... $137,190
The cost estimate includes contingencies and all related overhead. Over-
head costs are estimated at 30S and include legal, administrative, engineer-
ing, and bond interest costs. Estimated cost for easement acquistion is based
on land value utilized in acquiring pond easement for Pond JP -68 (Sterns
Addition).
Page 5
RPT49509 �/
AREA TO BE INCLUDED
Listed below are the parcels proposed to be assessed. These parcels ar
included in the Pond JP -27 drainage area and have not previously been assesse
trunk storm sewer.
PROJECT 597, ASSESSMENT AREA
NUI 1/4. SECTION 25
Parcel 050-26
Saddle Horn Addition Lots 1-7, Block 1
Lots 1-12, Block 2
Lots 1-6, Block 3
SW 1/4, SECTION 24
Hills of Stonebridge 3rd Addition
ASSESSMENTS
Trunk area storm sewer is proposed to be assessed to those parcels not
previously assessed. Appendix B located at the back of this report includes
the estimated trunk area storm sewer assessment for each parcel/lot. It is
assumed the remaining trunk area storm sewer assessments for the outlots in
Hills of Stonebridge Addition will be assessed as part of their development
agreement.
REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed
Proiect Cost Revenue
Easement Acquisition $137,190
Trunk Assessment $27,252
$137,190 $27,252
RPT49509
Page 6
1� (9
-$109,93
The estimated project deficit for this project is $109,938. The alloca-
tion of cost for easement acquisition for Pond JP -27 shall be determined by
the City Council at the public hearing for this improvement or as part of the
development agreement for Hills of Stonebridge 3rd Addition.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Easement Acquisition
Complete Construction (Hills of Stonebiidge 3rd Addition)
Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes
Page 7
RPT49509
RI
June 19, 1990
July 17, 1990
November, 1990
Fall, 1990
Spring, 1991
May, 1992
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES
HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE 3RD ADDITION
TRUNK STORM SEWER
PROJECT 597
Easement Acquisition - 3.1 acres at $25,000/acre
RPT49509
2.3 acres at $10,000/acre
+52 Contingencies
Total
+302 Legal, Engineering, Admin., & Interest
TOTAL......................................
Page 8
a!
$ 77,500
23,000
$100,500
5,030
$105,530
31,660
$137,190
I. TRUNK STORM SEWER
Parcel Descriptio
NW 1Z4, SECTION 25
Parcel 050-26
SADDLE HORN ADDITION
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE 3RD ADDITION
TRUNK STORM SEWER
PROJECT 597
Trunk Credit Assessable
Area S.F. (S.F.) Area
71,325 0 71,325
Rate Total
Per S.F. Assessment
$0.056 $ 3,994.20
Lot
1,
Block
1
14,348
(1
14,348
$0.056
$ 803.49
Lot
2,
Block
1
14,106
0
14,106
0.056
789.93
Lot
3,
Block
1
20,747
0
20,747
0.056
1,161.83
Lot
4,
Block
1
20,645
0
20,645
0.056
1,156.15
Lot
5,
Block
1
20,645
0
20,645
0.056
1,156.15
Lot
6,
Block
1
14,991
0
14,991
0.056
839.50
Lot
7,
Block
1
15,002
0
15,002
0.056
840.11
Lot
1,
Block
2
15,762
0
15,762
0.056
882.67
Lot
2,
Block
2
14,807
0
14,807
0.056
829.19
Lot
3,
Block
2
15,554
0
15,554
0.056
871.02
Lot
4,
Block
2
16,515
0
16,515
0.056
924.84
Lot
5,
Block
2
15,000
0
15,000
0.056
840.00
Lot
6,
Block
2
15,000
0
15,000
0.056
840.00
Lot
7,
Block
2
16,145
0
16,145
0.056
904.12
Lot
8,
Black
2
15,421
0
15,421
0.056
863.56
Lot
9,
Block
2
15,330
0
15,330
0.056
858.48
Lot
10,
Block 2
21,000
0
21,000
0.056
1,176.00
Lot
11,
Block 2
21,000
0
21,000
0.056
1,176.00
Lot
12,
Block 2
19,341
0
19,341
0.056
1,083.10
Lot
1,
Block
3
15,000
0
15,000
0.056
840.00
Lot
2,
Block
3
15,000
0
15,000
0.056
840.00
Lot
3,
Block
3
15,000
0
15,000
0.056
840.00
Lot
4,
Block
3
15,000
0
15,000
0.056
840.00
Lot
5,
Block
3
15,000
0
15,000
0.056
840.00
Lot
6,
Block
3
18,961
0
18,961
0.056
1,061.82
TOTAL TRUNK
STORM
ASSESSMENT
...........
$27,252.16
RPT49509
Page 9
JP -27 —
HWL=902.5
NWL=896.0
E
NSEi 4TH ADD ...N.
SUNSET DR
MWWORE DR
.7-7 Pond JP -27 J
Drainage Area
Hills of Stonebridge
3rd Addition
Storm Sewer Layout
City Project No. 597
6 -
:..
osed 15tbrm Sewer 1
SUNSET
tSE LUTHMURCH ADD
12TH ADD SUNSET
I
n Bonestroo Engineers QArchltects
WIN Rosene
Anderlik d
Associates at Paul. Minnesota
Date: June 1990
Comm. 49509 Fig. No.
foo
LASSO 'LN
T�....w•
r
•
;
0
500
1000
Scale in feet
n Bonestroo Engineers QArchltects
WIN Rosene
Anderlik d
Associates at Paul. Minnesota
Date: June 1990
Comm. 49509 Fig. No.
foo
Pt
KMWTOWNIV
rm Sewe
lessrnent A ea,
SUNSET
Vi
—1,07W
D
4........._.......»..-....__ ................
YORKTOWN
PL
SUAGI!!T 5
12TH ADD -
.. .........
...........
7 i5�
....... .
sumaT -Aw AM
14:3
'2
&�O 4N, 2
�UNDR
SSLT
3%
54
2
Hills of Stonebridge
3rd Addition
Storm Sewer Assessment Area
City Project No. 597
1 7 b 5
DR 6 3
FT] I
0 500 1000
Scole in feet
el Bonestroo Engimers &Arch1tocts
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates at. PAUL MIAM090ta
Date: June J 1990
Comm. 4950]�Fig. No. 3
0-
)
�o�
L
JP -53
L=875,0`
NWL=866.0,____
IND
Or
'410
Crv_ir,fa n Dra�in� oul e
i . ........ . ...... I . ......
Existing St r
Sewer
-----------
. . ........ . I-
JP -27
Jr3 HWL=902
NWL=896.0
KrO WN
SUNSET
Suhw :V%SE LUTH
CHURCH ADD
PL: 12TH ADD
YORK7Z AV P'� YORKTIO
•
CLAREN P4 SUMSET'477Y ADD 11 I LASSO LN
C -Ln
.,'SUNSEr OR W'
0
H4 KMORE DR
Pond JP -27
Drotha"ge Area 0 500 1000
MENEM----
Scale in feet
Hills of Stonebridge 3rd
Revised Lot Layout -Maintain
Existing Overland Drainage
City Project No. 597
Bonestroo Erogineers &Architects
Rosene
Anderilk &
Associates St. Paul. kfinrommis
Dote: June 1990
Comm. 49509 Fig. No. 4
�02
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990, City Council Meeting
ELRENE RD & KO ST RD
E. Project 589, Elrene Road & Kost Road - Streets & Utilities --On May 1, 1990, the
Council received the feasibility report for the above -referenced improvement and ordered
a public hearing to be held on June 5. Due to the preliminary plat application submitted
by Robert Engstrom for the Woodlands North Addition and the subsequent modifications
and alternatives to be included in t e feasibi i eport, this public hearing was continued
to Julv 17. Enclosed on pages \ hrough tis a copy of the revised feasibility report
for the Council's information arld r view dunng the staff's presentation of this proposed
project. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially
affected property owners informing them of this proposed improvement. Staff will be
available to address any questions or concerns that may arise during this public hearing
process.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITE1%1: To close the public hearing and
approve/deny Project 589, Elrene Road & Kost Road (Streets & Utilities) and, if
approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications along with
acquisition of easements through condemnation if necessary.
�03
Report for
Elrene Road & Kost Road
Utility and Street Improvements
Project No. 589
Eagan, Minnesota
MAY 1990
File No. 49504
Bonestroo
RoserNEW x
Anderilk
\ 1 Associates
r== COS
Bones t roo
Otto G Bonescroc PE
Roder W knene PE
Joseph C Anoenrk PE
Kean, A GorcorPE
Richarn A, Foste' PE
Dcaaio C BurgarQ; PE
Ja-ie; G Maanc PE
Kenne:r P ArdersGr PE
Md"k P Ra" t PE
Thomas R Ance-sor A
Ga'. F RyaiGe, PE
Mies B uense- FE
Mavir L Sorvala PE
Jerry A Bourdbr PE
Robe.^, C Risser A' A
L Pnnne GraveIf: PE
Rosene
RKhard E Turner. PE
Mark A Hanson. PE
Thomas E Angors FE
Rene C PLumart A A
James C Own PE
Tee K Frelo PE
Ho,%ard A Sanford PE
Agnes M Ring A IC P
Q
&Anderiik
Genn R Cook PE -
Mc-.ae, T Rairmanr PE
Daniel u Eocy.^:.r PE
Jerr: D Pe^scr, PE
Thomas E Noyes PE
Robert R Pefferte PE
MarK A Sec PE
Cecoc Orver PE
pp
Associates
Robert G Schunicht PE
David O Loskota PE
Philip J Caswell PE
PE
Chanes A ErncKson
M Pirwvsry
Susar M Eberlln. CPA
Thomas W Pet-Wn PE
Ismae- Martine:.
Lec
Mrchae.! C Lyn&, PE
Mark D Walaa PE
Har�a- M Oisor
Engineers & Architects
May 1, 1990
Honorable Mayor and City
Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Elrene Road and Kost
Road
Street and Utility Improvements
Project No. 589
Our File No. 49504
Dear Mayor and Council:
Attached is our report for Elrene Road and Kost Road Street and Utility Im-
provements, Project No. 589.
The report presents and discusses the proposed utility and street construc-
tion/improvements for Elrene Road from Wescott Road to Yankee Doodle Road and
for Kost Road west of Elrene Road. Also included in the report are cost
estimates and a preliminary assessment roll.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss this report.
Yours very truly,
BO T 09 R SENE ANDERLIK &
Mark son
MAH:li
ASSOCIATES, INC.
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Regis..pered Professional Engineer
under the laws ofAtM St e o innesota.
Date:(7
Approved by: 4ci
y-1
Date: �'�
RPT49504
/CLtuOe-,—
Date:—
Approved
-,—
Mark A. Hanson
0 Reg. No.
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota_55113 • 612-636-4600
r.
ELRENE ROAD AND KOST ROAD
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 589
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE
FEASIBILITY ANTD RECOMMENDATION
FIGURE 1 - LOCATION PLAN
DISCUSSION
STREET
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
WATER MAIN
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENT/PERMITS
COST ESTIMATE
AREA TO BE INCLUDED
ASSESSMENTS
STREET
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
WATER MAIN
REVENUE
PROJECT SCHEDULE
APPENDIX A - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES
APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
FIGURE 2 & 3 - STREET ASSESSMENT LENGTHS
FIGURE 4 & 5 - STORM SEWER
FIGURE 6 & 7 - LATERAL STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT AREAS
FIGURE 8 - TRUNK STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT AREAS
RPT49504
T-1
� o�
Pane No.
1.
1.
2.
3.
3.
4.
5.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
9.
10.
il.
11.
12.
13.
ELRENE ROAD AND ROST ROAD
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
PROJECT NO. 589
SCOPE: This project provides for the upgrading of Elrene Road (from just
north of Windtree Drive to Yankee Doodle Road) and Kost Road (from Elrene Road
to Trails End Road). The location of the project is shown in Figure No. 1.
The upgrading of Elrene Road consists of widening the existing 24' wide
rural roadway to a 36' wide urban roadway. The new 36' section will connect
to the existing 44' wide roadway to the south between Wescott Road and
Windtree Drive. A bituminous trail is preliminarily planned for on the east
side of Elrene Road in accordance with the City's Master Trail Plan. The need
for relocating the trail to the west side will be evaluated by the City Parks
Department in the near future. The upgrading of Kost Road consists of
regrading the existing rural gravel roadway and constructing a 32' wide
bituminous urban roadway. Upgrading both roads will also include utility
construction.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with street reconstruction policies in the
City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one
contract. Elrene Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid Street in the
City of Eagan. Therefore, the plans must be prepared in accordance with
Municipal State Aid Standards and be submitted to the State Aid Office for
their review and approval. Furthermore, Elrene Road will have to be upgraded
in accordance with Municipal State Aid Standards based on projected traffic
- 1 -
RPT49504
ELRENE ROAD 8 KOST ROAD
LOCATION PLAN
CITY PROJECT No. 589
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Aw."troo NyNkWW6 6 `fWW1�sw
PAWO"
AAderllk a
Date: MAY 1990
Comm. 49504 Fig. No.
counts for the year 2010. The existing average daily traffic count (ADT) for
this section of Elrene Road is 2790. The projected ADT for the year 2010 is
3570.
DISCUSSION:
Street - The proposed street construction under this project can be separated
into three sections (see Figure 1):
Rost Road - 32' wide residential roadway.
Elrene Road (north portion) - 36' wide roadway reconstruction.
Elrene Road (south portion) - 44' wide mill and overlay.
The first section, Kost Road, consists of the upgrading of the existing
gravel road to a 32' wide residential roadway. As part of the proposed con-
struction, street entrances for the proposed developments north and south of
Kost Road (Wescott Square and Woodlands North Addition) will be provided. The
intersection of Kost Road and Trails End Road will also be completed. Since
there will be no homes directly accessing Kost Road, it is proposed to install
B618 (non -surmountable) curb and gutter along the roadway.
The second street section, Elrene Road reconstruction, consists of the
reconstruction of Elrene Road between the north edge of the Windtree Additions
and Yankee Doodle Road (see Figure 1). The roadway in this section presently
consists of a 22' wide bituminous surface. It is proposed to reconstruct the
roadway to a 36' wide surface to connect to the existing urban road section
between Wescott Road and Windtree Drive. The present roadway was constructed
in 1974. At that time, the gravel base for the roadway was constructed to a
width of 401. This project will utilize the existing 40' wide gravel base
3
RPT49504
lo`t
where possible. However, part of the proposed project will require regrading
of roadway to meet sight distance requirements near Kost Road. The existing
gravel base will not be salvagable in the area that must be regraded. The
proposed Elrene Road design section is:
1' 2361 Bituminous Wear (to be placed in 1991)
1-1/2' 2341 Bituminous Binder
2-1/2" 2331 Bituminous Base
6' Class 5 Aggregate Base (existing)
9' Class 3 Aggregate Base (existing)
It is proposed to install B624 (non -surmountable) curb as part of this
construction. Also included is an 8' wide bituminous trail presumably along
the east side of the roadway (in accordance with the City's Master Trail Plan).
The final street section, Elrene Road overlay, consists of milling and
overlaying the existing 44' wide roadway between Wescott Road and 200' north
of Windtree Drive (see Figure 1). The existing surface in this section does
not meet State Aid design standards for the projected traffic counts of the
roadway. The proposed 1-1/4" overlay will add enough stability to the exist-
ing section to meet State Aid standards. It is also proposed to construct
valley gutters and repair broken concrete curb and gutter and street
settlements in this section prior to the overlay.
Storm Sewer - Storm sewer is proposed to be constructed to convey runoff from
streets and adjacent areas. The construction will include catch basins, man-
holes, and storm sewer outlets for the adjacent ponding areas. The proposed
storm sewer will provide an outlet from Pond JP -33.1 to Pond JP -33 (see Fig -
0 ures 4 & 5)•
The proposed storm sewer consists of lateral and trunk. The lateral storm
sewer will collect surface drainage from Kost Road, Elrene Road, and the sur-
RPT49504
- 4 -
�oo
rounding areas and discharge into either Pond JP -33.1 or the existing 33"
storm sewer located west of Mike Collins Drive on Kost Road. The lateral
storm sewer drainage area is shown in Figures 6 and 7.
Trunk storm sewer as part of this project consists of an 18" diameter
outlet pipe from Pond JP -33.1 connecting to the inlet pipe to Pond JP -33. The
inlet pipe to pond JP -33 will be constructed as part of the West Publishing
3rd Addition, project No. 585. Although an outlet to Pond JP -33.1 will be
provided, the exact dimensions of the pond will not be defined until the
adjacent property is developed. Listed below are the requirements for Pond
JP -33.1 which assume normal and high water levels.
Pond
Storage
Wet Vol. Reqd.
Outflow
Designation
NWL HWL (Ac.Ft.,,
(acre-feet)
cfs'
Pond JP -33.1
870 880 19.5
13.0
1.5 to 4.3
Sanitary Sewer - Presently sanitary sewer exists in both Kost Road and Elrene
Road. As part of this project, it is proposed to provide sanitary sewer stubs
for the proposed developments along Rost Road and the two proposed cul-de-sacs
on Elrene Road. It is also proposed to extend sanitary sewer in Kost Road
westerly from Mike Collins Drive to Trails End Road. Preliminary locations
for the sanitary sewer extension and stubs are shown on Figures 9 & 10.
Water Main - As part of this project, it is proposed to construct water main
in Kost Road. The proposed water main will connect to existing water main at
Elrene Road and at Mike Collins Drive. Water main stubs and hydrants will
also be provided for the proposed developments along Kost Road and the pro-
posed cul-de-sacs on Elrene Road (see Figures 9 & 10).
5 -
RPT49504
It is also proposed to construct a 16" trunk water main stub to the west
from Elrene Road, consistent with the City's Comprehensive Water Distribution
Plan. The exact location of this stub will be determined when final develop-
ment plans for the property west of Elrene Road is available.
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: Sufficient right-of-way exists to construct
both Elrene and Kest Roads. However, it is proposed to acquire an additional
2' of R.O.W. along the east side of Elrene Road for bituminous trail construc-
tion. Also, temporary slope easements will be needed along both roadways. A
permanent street easement will be required on the southeast corner of the in-
tersection of Trails End and Kest Roads. This easement will be necessary to
provide a 20 MPH street curve at that location.
A permanent storm sewer easement will be required for storm sewer dis-
charging into and out of Pond JP -33.1. A storm sewer easement will also be
necessary along the east side of Elrene Road to allow the storm sewer to be
constructed behind the east curb line to protect the existing gravel base.
Also, a storm sewer easement will be necessary to connect the proposed storm
sewer to existing storm sewer on the west end of Kest Road.
Listed below are the parcels requiring permanent easements:
Parcel Description
WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS
Easement Type Estimated Area
Lot 2, Block 1 Street 2,800 ft2
WESCOTT HILLS THIRD ADDITION
Lot 14, Block 1 Storm Sewer 600 ft2
NW 114, SECTION 13
Parcel 012-26 Street 1,440 ft2
Parcel 011-26 Storm Sewer 2,200 ft2
Pond 2,600 ft2
Street 1,070 ft2
RPT49504
\u-
NW 114, SECTION 13 - Continued ....
Parcel Description
Parcel 010-28
Parcel 022-29
SW 1/4, SECTION 13
Parcel 022-29
Easement Type Estimated Area
Storm Sewer 5,800 ft2
Pond 15,000 ft2
Street 690 ft2
Storm Sewer 5,100 ft2
Street 2,040 ft2
Street 700 ft2
A permit is required from the Minnesota Department of Health for all water
main construction. A permit is also required from Dakota County for the inter-
section of Elrene Road and Yankee Doodle Road.
ST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented at the back of
report in Appendix A. A summary of these costs are as follows:
Street and Trail $576,320
Utilities - Water Main 70,480
Storm Sewer 210,030
Sanitary Sewer 50,980
TOTAL....................... $907,810
The total estimated project cost as outlined herein including contin
cies and all related overhead is $907,810. Overhead costs are estimate
301 and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest.
RPT49504
- 7 -
`\3
AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Listed below are the parcels proposed to be assessed.
NW IZ4 SECTION 13
Un latted Property:
Parcel 012-26
Parcel 011-26
Parcel 010-28
Parcel 022-29
Parcel 021-29
SW 1/4/ SECTION 13
Unplatted Property:
Parcel 022-29
Parcel 021-29
Platted Property:
South Hills First Addition
NE 1/4 SECTION 14
Unplatted Property:
Parcel 013-01
Platted Property:
Wescott Hills Revised 2nd Addition
Wescott Hills Revised 3rd Addition
Wescott Hills
Wescott Garden Lots
Lots 1 and 9; Block 2
Lots 1 and 2, Block 2
Lots 15-17, Block 1
Lot 1, Block 3
Lot 1, Block 1
Lot 1, Block 4 (Parcel 010-04)
Lot 1, Block 4 (Parcel 011-04)
Lot 2, Block 1
Listed below is property abutting the overlay portion of Elrene Road that
is not proposed to be assessed (construction area).
Platted Property:
Windtree Addition
Windtree 3rd Addition
Windtree 5th Addition
Windtree 7th Addition
South Hills First Addition
RPT49504
Lots 1, 4, 5, & 14; Block 1
Lot 1; Block 1
Lots 1, 8, 9, & 10; Block 3
Lots 10 & 11; Block 1
Lots 1-4; Block 1
Lots 10 & 11; Block 2
- 8 -
l ��
Listed below is property abutting Rost Road that is not proposed to be
assessed (construction area).
NE 1/4, SECTION 14
Parcel 011-02
FESCOTT HILLS REVISED 3RD ADDITION
Lot 14, Block 1
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
properties in accordance with assessment policies established in the City of
Eagan. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B (attached).
Assessments will be spread over a 10 year period at an interest rate deter-
mined at the time of the bond sale.
The proposed assessments are separated into street, bituminous trail
trunk storm sewer, lateral storm sever, sanitary sewer, and water main
Figures 2-9 (attached) illustrate the assessments.
Street Assessments - Street is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basi
to the adjacent properties. Corner lot credit of 75' is applied to the lon,
side of all residential corner lots. Street assessments for this project fal
into three sections: Rost Road, the north portion of Elrene Road (reconstruc-
tion), and the south portion of Elrene Road (overlay). It is proposed to
assess the street in these three sections on a front foot basis to the adja-
cent properties based on the final construction costs for section. The
assessment rate for the Elrene Road Overlay is determined by dividing the
estimated cost of an equivalent 32' vide residential street by the total
footage of the overlay section. Those lots taking direct access to Elrene
Road are proposed to be assessed one-half of this rate.
- 9 -
♦ RPT49504
Estimated assessment rates based on the cost estimates in Appendix A are
shown below. Rates were determined by dividing the assessable footage in each
section by the estimated cost. The assessable footage was determined by
taking the total length of street in each section and subtracting all street
right-of-ways. The bituminous trail rate is from the approved 1989 City Trunk
Assessment Rates.
PRELIMINARY STREET ASSESSMENT RATES
Assessable
Street Footage Estimated Cost Rate
Rost Road 2,535.90 $114,090 $44.99
Elrene Rd. (reconstruction) 6,213.47 397,430 63.96
Elrene Road (overlay)
Bituminous Trail, Predetermined Rate
3,961.53 41,200 10.40*
8.10
* Residential assessment rate is $4.29. This is based on one-half of the
equivalent cost of an overlay for a 32' wide street.
Storm Sewer Assessments - Storm sewer proposed herein is lateral and trunk.
Lateral storm sewer is to be assessed on a square foot basis to the properties
which drain to, or benefit from, the storm sewer constructed as part of this
project. The lateral assessment rate per square foot is determined by taking
the total lateral storm sewer cost divided by the total drainage area includ-
ing street right-of-vay.
The rate per square foot is separated into commercial, multiple, and resi-
dential rates based on the percentage difference for the trunk area storm
sewer rate. The estimated lateral storm sewer cost (to be assessed by drain-
age area) is $144,190.
Listed below are the drainage areas used for determining each lateral
rate. It is assumed for purposes of this report that street right-of-way is
commercial and is not to be assessed.
Street R.O.W.
Commercial
Multiple (.8434 Comm.)
Residential (.6747 Comm.)
Area s .ft.
Rate(per s .ft.
301,500
N/A
430,800
0.111
669,500
0.093
6,870
0.075
Final lateral storm sewer assessment rates will be determined by using the
actual storm sewer costs. The final lateral costs along with the areas and
percentages above can be used to determine the final rate.
It is also proposed to assess trunk storm sewer to the benefited proper-
ties east of Elrene Road which have not yet been assessed. The parcels to be
assessed trunk storm sewer are shown on Figure 8.
Sanitary Sewer Assessments - Sanitary sewer proposed herein is lateral and is
to be assessed totally to the benefited properties. All sanitary sewer in
Rost Road between Trails End Road and Mike Collins is to be assessed to the
assessable property along Kost Road on a front foot basis. The estimated rate
is $18.50/F.F. Preliminary assessments are presented in Appendix B. Final
assessments will be based on actual construction costs.
Water Main Assessments - dater main proposed herein is lateral and is to be
assessed to the benefiting properties. Water main in Rost Road will be
assessed to abutting properties on a front foot basis. The preliminary rate
as shown in Appendix B is $26.47/front foot. Actual rates will be based upon
final construction costs.
RPT49504
<<1
Water main proposed along Elrene Road is for future development and is to
be assessed totally to the benefited properties. It is proposed to assess
Parcel 011-04 the equivalent value of an 8' water main stub as a lateral
benefit from the 16' trunk water main stub to be constructed.
REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project as listed below:
Balance
Proiect Cost Revenue CDeficit)
STREET
Street $552,720 $513,240 ($39,480)
Bituminous Trail 23,600 25,531 1,931
UTILITIES
Lateral hater Main
$ 65,091
$ 65,091
0
Trurk Water Mair:
5,400
3,700
($ 1,700)
Trunk Storm Sever
65,840
124,251
58,411
Lateral Storm Sever
144,190
110,597
(33,593)
Sanitary Sever
50,969
50,969
0
The deficit for street of $39,480 will be the responsibility of the major
street fund. The trunk storm sever surplus of $58,411 will be deposited into
the Trunk Storm Sever Fund.
+ RPT49504
- 12 -
�l�
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans and Specifications
Open Bids/Award Contract
Substantial Completion of Construction
Complete Construction
Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes
RPT49504
- 13 -
May 1, 1990
July 17, 1990
August, 1990
August, 1990
November 1990
June 1991
September 1991
May 1992
ET IMPROVEMENTS
A. KOST ROAD
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
ELRENE ROAD AND KOST ROAD
PROJECT NO. 589
Unit
Unit Price
Common excavation
C.Y.
Subgrade Correction
C.Y.
Subgrade Preparation
S.Y.
1002 Crushed Class 5 aggregate
Ton
Concrete curb & gutter
L.F.
Bituminous base course
Ton
Bituminous wear course
Ton
Bituminous Material for Mixture
Ton
Bituminous Material for Tack
Gal.
Adjust Manhole
Ea.
Adjust gate valve and box
Ea.
Pavement Striping
L.F.
Topsoil borrow
C.Y.
Sod
S.Y.
Seed with mulch & fertilizer
Ac.
Total
+52 Contingencies
RPT49504
$ 3.00
5.00
1.00
7.00
5.00
12.00
14.00
150.00
1.00
100.00
80.00
0.16
5.00
2.00
1,000.00
Quantity
3,500
700
5,000
1,980
2,850
580
290
49
380
7
7
1,000
500
6,400
1.0
+305 Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
TOTAL KOST ROAD STREETS ...................
A-1
Total
Cost
$ 10,500
3,500
5,000
13,860
14,250
6,960
4,060
7,350
380
700
560
160
2,
12,
1,
$ 83,
4,
$ 87,
26,
$114,
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD STREETS W/CURB .......... $397,430
A-2
RPT49504 a1\
Unit
Total
Unit
Price
Quantity
Cost
B. ELRENE ROAD WITH CURB North Section
Traffic control
L.S.
$5,000.00
1
$ 5,000
Remove bituminous surface
S.Y.
1.00
10,000
10,000
Clearing & grubbing
L.S.
3,000.00
1
3,000
Common excavation
C.Y.
3.00
7,900
23,700
Subgrade correction
C.Y.
5.00
1,000
5,000
Subgrade preparation
S.Y.
1.00
20,900
20,900
Common borrow
C.Y.
3.00
4,000
12,000
Class 5 aggregate base
Tor,
5.00
6,500
32,500
B624 conc. curb & gutter
L.F.
6.00
6,800
40,800
Bituminous base course
Ton
12.00
2,200
26,400
Bituminous binder course
Ton
13.00
1,330
17,290
Bituminous wear course
Ton
14.00
900
12,600
Bituminous material for mixture
Ton
150.00
200
30,000
Bituminous material for tack coat
Gals.
1.00
2,050
2,050
Adjust manhole & catch basin
Ea.
100.00
23
2,300
Adjust gate valve and box
Ea.
80.00
10
800
Pavement Striping
L.F.
0.15
24,667
3,700
Modular Block Retaining Wall
S.F.
14.00
1,430
20,020
Topsoil borrow
C.Y.
5.00
1,500
7,500
Sod
S.Y.
2.00
6,800
13,600
Seeding w/mulch & fertilizer
Ac.
1,000.00
2
2,000
Total
$291,160
+5Z Contingencies
14,558
$305,718
+301 Legal,
Engrng.,
Admin. & Bond
Interest
91,712
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD STREETS W/CURB .......... $397,430
A-2
RPT49504 a1\
Total $ 30,200
+51 Contingencies 1,500
$ 31,700
+301 Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 9,500
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD OVERLAY .................. $ 41,200
Unit
Unit
Total
Unit
Unit
Price
Quantity
Cost
C. ELRENE ROAD OVERLAY (South
section)
Remove existing bituminous
S.Y.
$ 1.00
320
$ 320
Repair existing conc. curb
L.F.
10.00
310
3,100
Install conc. valley gutter
L.F.
10.00
200
2,000
Class 5 Aggregate base
Ton
5.00
100
500
30 Bituminous patch
S.Y.
4.00
320
1,280
Mill Ex. bituminous
S.Y.
1.25
3,000
3,750
Adjust manhole
Ea.
100.00
6
600
Adjust gate valve
Ea.
80.00
3
240
1-1/40 bituminous wear overlay
Ton
14.00
750
10,500
Bituminous material for mixture
Ton
150.00
45
6,750
Bituminous material for tack
Gal.
1.00
350
350
Pavement striping
L.F.
0.15
5,400
810
Total $ 30,200
+51 Contingencies 1,500
$ 31,700
+301 Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 9,500
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD OVERLAY .................. $ 41,200
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD TRAIL ................... $ 23,600
A-3
RPT49504 D—
Unit
Total
Unit
Price
Quantity
Cost
D. ELRENE ROAD BITUMINOUS TRAIL
Aggregate base for trail Ton
$ 5.00
1,500
$
7,500
2" Bituminous walk S.F.
0.30
32,650
9,800
Total
$
17,300
+51 Contingencies
865
$
18,165
+301 Legal, Engrag.,
Admin. & Bond
Interest
5,435
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD TRAIL ................... $ 23,600
A-3
RPT49504 D—
II. STORM SEWER
Unit Total
Unit Price Quantity Cost
A. TRUNK
15" R.C.P.
L.F.
$ 23.00
380
$
8,740
18" R.C.P.
L.F.
26.00
1,225
31,850
15" R.C.P. Flared
end Ea.
640.00
1
640
Rip rap
C.Y.
30.00
5
150
Standard Manhole
Ea.
1,000.00
5
5,000
Mechanical trench
compaction L.F.
1.00
1,605
1,605
Marker sign w/post
Ea.
50.00
5
250
Total
$
48,235
+52 Contingencies
2,412
$
50,647
+302 Legal, Engrng.,
Admin. & Bond
Interest
15,193
TOTAL KOST ROAD STORM SEWER ................ $ 65,840
A-4
RPT49504 g— 3
6..
B. LATERAL
Unit
Unit Price Quantity
Total
Cost
12" R.C.P.
L.F.
$ 20.00
18
$ 360
15" R.C.P.
L.F.
23.00
1,016
23,368
18" R.C.P.
L.F.
26.00
156
4,050
21" R.C.P.
L.F.
30.00
773
23,190
24" R.C.P.
L.F.
32.00
340
10,880
30" R.C.P.
L.F.
38.00
120
4,560
15" RCP Flared end
Ea.
620.00
1
620
30" RCP Flared end
Ea.
865.00
1
865
Rip rap
C.Y.
30.00
15
450
Standard catch basin
Ea.
750.00
18
13.500
Standard catch basin manhole
Ea.
900.00
11
9,900
Standard manhole
Ea.
1,000.00
6
6,000
Reconstruct catch basin
Ea.
250.00
6
1,500
Remove Ex. catch basin
Ea.
100.00
2
200
Remove Ex. manhole
Ea.
100.00
3
300
Remove Ex. RCP
L.F.
5.00
550
2,750
Mechanical trench compaction
L.F.
1.00
2,740
2,740
Marker sign w;post
Ea.
50.00
8
400
Total
$105,633
+5Z Contingencies
5,282
$110,915
+30Z Legal,
Engrng.,
Admin. & Bond
Interest
33,275
TOTAL LATERAL ............................. $144,190
A-5
RPT49504 [ 4
III. SANITARY SEWER
RPT49504
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD, WOODLAND NORTH .......... $ 10,650
A-6
has
Unit
Total
Unit
Price
Quantity
Cost
A. KOST ROAD
ROAD WOODLANDS NORTH
8" D.I.P.
L.F.
$ 25.00
520
$
13,000
8" P.V.C.
dia. manhole
L.F.
15.00
285
4,275
Outside drop
trench compaction
L.F.
150.00
20
3,000
Connect to Ex. manhole
Total
Ea.
400.00
3
$
1,200
Standard 4" dia. manhole
+51 Contingencies
Ea.
1,500.00
5
390
7,500
Mechanical trench compaction
L.F.
1.00
570
$
570
Total
Engrng.,
Admin. & Bond
Interest
$
29,545
+51 Contingencies
1,477
$
31,022
+301 Legal,
Engrng.,
Admin. & Bond
Interest
9,308
TOTAL KOST
ROAD ...........................
$
40,330
RPT49504
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD, WOODLAND NORTH .......... $ 10,650
A-6
has
Unit
Total
Unit
Price
Quantity
Cost
B. ELRENE
ROAD WOODLANDS NORTH
8" P.V.C.
L.F.
$ 15.00
200
$
3,000
Standard 4'
dia. manhole
Ea.
1,500.00
3
4,500
Mechanical
trench compaction
L.F.
1.00
200
200
Total
$
7,800
+51 Contingencies
390
$
8,190
+301 Legal,
Engrng.,
Admin. & Bond
Interest
21460
RPT49504
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD, WOODLAND NORTH .......... $ 10,650
A-6
has
IV. WATER MAIN
Unit Total
Unit Price Quantity Cost
A. KOST ROAD
6" D.I.P. Cl. 52
L.F.
$ 20.00
100
$
2,000
8" D.I.P. Cl. 52
L.F.
22.00
1,380
Fittings Lbs.
30,360
8" Gate valve & box
Ea.
550.00
2
1,100
6" Gate valve & box
Ea.
500.00
6
3,000
Hydrant w/fittings
Ea.
1,200.00
3
$
3,600
Relocate E_. hydrant
Ea.
520.00
1
�1 700
520
Connect to Ex. WM
Ea.
100.00
2
200
Mechanical Trench compaction L.F.
1.00
1,480
1,480
Total
$
42,260
+5I Contingencies
2,110
$
44,370
+301 Legal, Engrng..
Admin. & Bond
Interest
13,310
TOTAL KOST ROAD WATER MAIN ................ $ 57,680
Unit Total
Unit Price Quantity Cost
B. ELRENE ROAD (Parcel 021-29)
8" Wet tap Ea.
$1,600.00
2
$
3,200
8" D.I.P. Cl. 52 L.F.
22.00
100
2,200
Fittings Lbs.
1.50
20
30
Total
$
5,430
+5I Contingencies
270
$
5,700
+30Z Legal, Engrng.,
Admin. & Bond
Interest
�1 700
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD WATER MAIN .............. $ 7,400
A-7
RPT49504
gL�
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD TRUNK STUB ............... $ 5,400
V. PROJECT NO. 589 ESTIMATED COST TOTALS
A. STREET IMPROVEMENTS
a.) Rost Road $114,090
b.) Elrene Road with Curb (north section) 397,430
c.) Elrene Road Overlay (south section) 41,200
d.) Elrene Road Trail 23,600
B. UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
a.) Trunk Storm Sever $ 65,840
b.) Lateral Storm Sever 144,190
c.) Rost Road Sanitary Sewer 40,330
d.) Elrene Road Sanitary Sever 10,650
e.) Rost Road Water Main 57,680
f.) Elrene Road Water Main 7,400
g.) Elrene Road Trunk Water Main 5,400
TOTAL PROJECT NO. 589 ................................. $907,810
A-8
RPT49504
Unit
Total
Unit
Price
Quantity
Cost
C.
ELRENE ROAD TRUNK
STUB
Cut
in 16x16 Tee
Ea.
$2,000.00
1
$
2,000
16"
DIP
L.F.
25.00
40
1,000
168
Butterfly valve
Ea.
970.00
1
970
Fittings
Lbs.
1.50
20
30
Total
$
4,000
+51 Contingencies
200
$
4,200
+301 Legal, Engrng.,
Admin. & Bond
Interest
1,200
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD TRUNK STUB ............... $ 5,400
V. PROJECT NO. 589 ESTIMATED COST TOTALS
A. STREET IMPROVEMENTS
a.) Rost Road $114,090
b.) Elrene Road with Curb (north section) 397,430
c.) Elrene Road Overlay (south section) 41,200
d.) Elrene Road Trail 23,600
B. UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
a.) Trunk Storm Sever $ 65,840
b.) Lateral Storm Sever 144,190
c.) Rost Road Sanitary Sewer 40,330
d.) Elrene Road Sanitary Sever 10,650
e.) Rost Road Water Main 57,680
f.) Elrene Road Water Main 7,400
g.) Elrene Road Trunk Water Main 5,400
TOTAL PROJECT NO. 589 ................................. $907,810
A-8
RPT49504
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
ELRENE ROAD AND ROST ROAD
PROJECT NO. 589
I. STREET AND TRAIL
Parcel Assessable Street Total
Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment
A. ROST ROAD
NE 114 SECTION 14
WESCOTT HILLS REVISED 2ND ADDITION
Lot 1,
Block 2
93.94
$44.99
$
4,226.36
Lot 2,
Block 2
95.62
44.99
Parcel
4,301.94
WESCOTT
HILLS REVISED
3RD ADDITION
Parcel
022-29
1,020
Lot 15,
Block 1
30.00
021-29
$
1,349.70
Lot 16,
Block 1
47.00
$44.99
2,114.53
Lot 17,
Block 1
90.00
$63.96
$ 33,898.80
4,049.10
WESCOTT
HILLS
63.96
33,898.80
Lot 1,
Block 3
922.53
$44.99
$
41,504.62
WESCOTT
GARDEN LOTS
Lot 1,
Block 1
628.50
$44.99
$
28,276.21
Lot 2,
Block 1
628.40
44.99
28,271.72
2,179.43
TOTAL ROST ROAD ...
$114,094.18
B. ELRENE ROAD WITH CURB (NORTH SECTION
NW 114 SECTION 13
Parcel
012-26
720
$63.96
$ 46,051.20
Parcel
011-26
535
63.96
34,218.60
Parcel
010-28
345
63.96
22,066.20
Parcel
022-29
1,020
63.96
65,239.20
Parcel
021-29
1,020
63.96
65,239.20
SW 114
SECTION 13
Parcel
021-29
530
$63.96
$ 33,898.80
Parcel
022-29
530
63.96
33,898.80
RPT49504
NE 1/4 SECTION 14
Parcel 013-01
YESCOTT HILLS
Lot 1, Block 3
WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS
Lot 1, Block 1
Lot 1, Block 4 (1010-04)
Lot 1, Block 4 (1011-04)
280
$63.96
$
17,908.80
293.10
$63.96
$
18,746.67
595.37
$63.96
$
38,079.86
190
63.96
12,152.40
155
63.96
9.913.80
6,213.47
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD STREET...
$397,413.54
C. ELRENE ROAD OVERLAY (SOUTH SECTION
SOUTH HILLS ADDITION
Lot 1, Block 2 193.85
Lot 9, Block 2 210.00
403.85
D. BITUMINOUS TRAIL
NW 1/4, SECTION 13
Parcel
Description
Parcel 012-26
Parcel 011-26
Parcel 010-28
Parcel 022-29
SW 1/4. SECTION 13
Parcel 022-29
RPT49504
Assessable
Footage
720
535
345
1,022
530
$ 4.29 $ 831.62
4.29 900.90
TOTAL ELRENE RD. OVERLAY... $ 1,732.52
Street Trail
Total
Rate/F.F. Rate/F.F.
Assessment
-- $8.10
$ 5,832.00
-- 8.10
4,333.50
-- 8.10
2,794.50
-- 8.10
8,278.20
-- $8.10 $ 4.293.00
TOTAL BITUMINOUS TRAIL ... $ 25,531.20
B-2
�aq
r
0
II. STORM SEWER
B. LATERAL STORM SEWER
NW 114 SECTION 13
Parcel 012-26
Parcel 011-26
Parcel 010-28
Parcel 022-29
Parcel 021-29
SW 114 SECTION 13
Parcel 021-29
Parcel 022-29
NE 114 SECTION 14
Parcel 013-01
WESCOTT HILLS
Lot 1, Block 3
WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS
TOTAL TRUNK STORM SEWER ...... $124,251.83
29,600
$0.111
$ 3,285.60
Assessable
0.00
Parcel
Trunk
Credit
Area
Rate
Total
Description
Area (S.F.)
(S.F.)
(SQ.ft.)
Per S.F.
Assessment
A. TRUNK STORM
SEWER
NW 114, SECTION
13
Parcel 012-26
453,930
0
816,450
$0.083
$ 67,765,35
362,520
0
Parcel 011-26
684,680
4,120
680,560
0.083
56,486.48
B. LATERAL STORM SEWER
NW 114 SECTION 13
Parcel 012-26
Parcel 011-26
Parcel 010-28
Parcel 022-29
Parcel 021-29
SW 114 SECTION 13
Parcel 021-29
Parcel 022-29
NE 114 SECTION 14
Parcel 013-01
WESCOTT HILLS
Lot 1, Block 3
WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS
TOTAL TRUNK STORM SEWER ...... $124,251.83
29,600
$0.111
$ 3,285.60
0.00
38,000
0.111
4,218.00
284,800
0.111
31,612.80
59,600
0.093
5,542.80
0.00
78,400 $0.111 8,702.40
6,870 $0.075 515.25
144,200 $0.093 13,410.60
Lot 1, Block 1 250,500 $0.093 23,296.50
Lot 2, Block 1 215,200 $0.093 20,013.60
TOTAL LATERAL STORM SEWER .................. $110,597.55
B-3
RPT49504
13°
III. SANITARY SEWER
Total
Assessment
B. ELRENE ROAD
NW 1/4, SECTION 13: Parcel 021-29 $ 5,325.00
SW 1/4, SECTION 13: Parcel 021-29 _ 5,325.00
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD SANITARY SEWER ........................... $10,650.00
IV. WATER MAIN
A. KOST ROAD
Assessable Total
Footaze Rate/F.F. Assessment
WESCOTT HILLS: Lot 1, Block 3 922.53 $26.47 $ 24,419.36
WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS: Lot 1, Block 1 628.50 26.47 16,636.39
Lot 2, Block 1 628.40 26.47 16 ,633.75
2.189.43 TOTAL KOST ROAD
WATER MAIN $ 57,689.50
B. ELRENE ROAD
NE 1/4,
Assessable
N/A
Total
Project Description
Footage
Rate/F.F.
Assessment
A. KOST ROAD
$ 3,700.00
SW 1/4,
SECTION 13: Parcel 021-29
WESCOTT HILLS: Lot 1, Block 3
922.53
$18.50
$ 17,066.80
WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS: Lot 1, Block 1
628.50
18.50
11,627.25
Lot 2, Block 1
628.40
18.50
11,625.40
2,179.43
TOTAL KOST RD.
SANITARY SEWER
$ 40,319.45
Total
Assessment
B. ELRENE ROAD
NW 1/4, SECTION 13: Parcel 021-29 $ 5,325.00
SW 1/4, SECTION 13: Parcel 021-29 _ 5,325.00
TOTAL ELRENE ROAD SANITARY SEWER ........................... $10,650.00
IV. WATER MAIN
A. KOST ROAD
Assessable Total
Footaze Rate/F.F. Assessment
WESCOTT HILLS: Lot 1, Block 3 922.53 $26.47 $ 24,419.36
WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS: Lot 1, Block 1 628.50 26.47 16,636.39
Lot 2, Block 1 628.40 26.47 16 ,633.75
2.189.43 TOTAL KOST ROAD
WATER MAIN $ 57,689.50
B. ELRENE ROAD
NE 1/4,
SECTION 14: Parcel 011-04
N/A
N/A
$ 3,700.00*
NW 1/4,
SECTION 13: Parcel 012-29
N/A
N/A
$ 3,700.00
SW 1/4,
SECTION 13: Parcel 021-29
N/A
N/A
3,700.00
TOTAL ELRENE
ROAD WATER MAIN
..............
$ 11,100.00
* Lateral benefit from trunk.
RPT49504
B-4
X31
APPENDIX B CONT.
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY
ELRENE ROAD AND KOST ROAD
PROJECT NO. 589
WESCOTT HILLS REVISED 2ND ADDITION
Lot 1, Block 2 S 4,226
Lot 2, Block 2 4,302
WESCOTT HILLS REVISED 3RD ADDITION
Lot 15, Block 1 $ 1,350
Lot 16, Block 1 2,114
Lot 17, Block 1 4,049
WESCOTT HILLS:
Lot 1, Block 3 S 60,251
S 4,226
4,302
$ 1,350
2,114
4,049
-- S 13,411 $17,067 $24,419 $115,148
WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS:
Lot 1, Block 1 S 66,356 -- -- $ 23,297 $11,627 $16,636 $117,916
Lot 2, Block 1 28,272 20,014 11,627 16.634 76,545
TOTALS ......... $513,240 $25,531 0124,251 $110,597 $50,969 $68,791 $893,379
* Lot 1, Block 4, Wescott Carden Lots
e-5
Trunk
Lateral
Sanitary
Yater
Total
Parcel DescriCtian
Street
Trail
Stora
Storm.
Sewer
ain
Assessserts
NW 1/4, SECTION 13:
Parcel 012-26
S 46,051
$ 5,832
$ 67,765
S 3,286
--
--
$122,934
Parcel 011-26
34,219
4,333
56,486
--
--
-_
95,038
Parcel 010-28
22,066
2,794
--
4,218
--
--
29,078
Parcel 022-29
65,239
8,278
--
31,613
--
--
105,130
Parcel 021-29
65,239
--
--
5,543
S 5,325
$ 3,700
79,807
SW 1/4, SECTION 13•
Parcel 021-29
s 33,899
--
-
--
$ 5,325
$ 3,700
S 42,924
Parcel 022-29
33,899
$ 4,293
--
S 8,702
--
--
46,894
SOUTH HILLS ADDN:
Lot 1, Block 2
$ 832
--
--
--
--
--
s 832
Lot 9, Block 2
901
--
--
--
--
--
9Q1
NE 1/4, SECTION 14-
ParceL 013-01
S 17,909
--
--
S 515
--
--
S 18,424
*Parcel 010-04
12,152
--
--
--
--
--
12,152
*Parcel 011-04
9,914
--
--
--
--
S 3,700
13,614
WESCOTT HILLS REVISED 2ND ADDITION
Lot 1, Block 2 S 4,226
Lot 2, Block 2 4,302
WESCOTT HILLS REVISED 3RD ADDITION
Lot 15, Block 1 $ 1,350
Lot 16, Block 1 2,114
Lot 17, Block 1 4,049
WESCOTT HILLS:
Lot 1, Block 3 S 60,251
S 4,226
4,302
$ 1,350
2,114
4,049
-- S 13,411 $17,067 $24,419 $115,148
WESCOTT GARDEN LOTS:
Lot 1, Block 1 S 66,356 -- -- $ 23,297 $11,627 $16,636 $117,916
Lot 2, Block 1 28,272 20,014 11,627 16.634 76,545
TOTALS ......... $513,240 $25,531 0124,251 $110,597 $50,969 $68,791 $893,379
* Lot 1, Block 4, Wescott Carden Lots
e-5
YANKEE DOODLEI ROAD
5 6 7 8
`WESCOTT SQUARE
116
1 14
kms'
013-01
0%
I ow).
b
922 53'
n n 62b.40� K O$ 626.50' i
II 11 1,11
PROP08ED WOO ANDS NORTH ADDITION
� I
O
2 i
Z oI
W �1
J ADO O
OI Ast4owbis fooroq#
�
I— �� Se • I • b /eN
S' CEDAR STREET
17- i [+ .
I �
I O
m
;1I W
012-26
8' BIT.
TRAIL
-' C Q 1;l
2 S' 011- 04 010.04 $i �/i 010.26
4 I in
sm"If00 lyar.«r• Is.•+Irw•.
Amen m
Arl MIM A
AYa�vlile ac rnr� w.r...•.
Dote: MAY 1990 O. 2
Comm. 49504 [Fig.
a
Ln
i'
V
4
4
0
zoo O POO
Score in tee/
WEST 1/4 COR.,SEC. 13
010-28
8' BIT. TRAIL
�co 1
PC' Assessable
Footage
oQ�
�O
W
�<v 021- 29 Q-
_0
022-29
022-29
WINDTREE ADDITION .0�1DW\INDT
ELRENE ROAD 8 KOST ROAD
STREET ASSESSMENT LENGTHS
CITY PROJECT No. 589
EAGAN, MINNESOTA,
�3
�
el�tPo !�{...... An........
AA~i* a
Date: MAY 1990 3
Comm. 49504 F19. No
�1
A YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
5 6 7 g W ROAD
>
O ¢ O I 013-01
i
*e,9 o
WESjCOTT SQUARE 00rT
16 0
Q 1 I I Y GO'�•� N RF 40 012-26
X15 16 17 2 Vy�s O I O�riON
14
IB 15 15" O
t KOST ROAD ¢
r
w
01!-02 PROPOSED WOOCILANDS NORTH ADDITION
15 W
Z
W
2 1 a
J
W
X011-26
014-02p OI r
� `� E; 15�� RCP TO 1 oi'
BE REMOVED 1 u J`f POND
Sswl. /w JNJ 1 8� w �4 dP-33.1
CEDAR STREET 1 /,f/ twobbo
Z 1
W
M `0%' 010.04
2 O 0{ {• 04
i ; f4f0l0.28
� 4 *I iLf 15••
ELRENE ROAD 8 KOST ROAD
STORM SEINER
CITY PROJECT No. 589
EAGAN# MINNESOTA
3�
YET,•
flow•atraa e......�.. +I...f1..1.
Ao"►m
Aarv"l"
Dau: MAY 1690 FI NO. 4
comm. 4► a 60� 9
.l
200 0 200
scale in tool
WEST 1/4 COR., SEC. 13
010-28
021-29 ,
IB�
PON' ) JP -33
1 NWL=833
HWL =850
022-29
'27 _ 94
181•
021-29 l u 022-29
STORM SEWER TO BE
CONSTRUCTED UNDER
WEST PUBLISHING 3r
ADD., CITY CONTRACT
No. 585.
ELRENE ROAD 8 KOST ROAD
STORM SEWER,
CITY PROJECT No. 588
EAGAN, MINNESOTA,
WINDTREE ADDITION WINDTR
3rd p,
i rpo4troo seem~* 6 Am"wa. "
"N 4"
&L •tea �.....�.
oma: MAY 1990
QMM- 49504 Fig. No. 5
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD
90
j 0 6,870 Sq. ft.
013-01
cl)
z o� .
J
U
w r 16,500 Sq.ft.
f t o
.100,
� \.
215, 200 Sq.ft.
PROPOSED/ -
Iwo`
1
1
2 �
170 o
i
Sc a /h
CEDAR
2
O
s4 /
Fi
. ;0 127,700 Sq.ft.
110
ti
KOST ROAD
DL -ANDS �250, 500Sq. ft. j ORTH ADD/T
t - 'Oy
I
0 1
STREET
ELRENE ROAD $ KOST ROAD
STORM SEINER ASSESS. AREAS
CITY PROJECT No. 589
EAGANs MINNESOTA
29,600Sq.ft. /
012-26
LATERAL
AREA RAINAGE
BOUNDARY
� a
I
z
w
Iz
w
ND JP -33.1
010-04 � � \
//ip 1 10 -
/ 28
I 1 iii/
Arralrl�t +
A+Nvc.L� .L rr...m.m. ft
Date: MAY 199
Comm. 49504 LFig. No. 6
4
ril
X00 0 zeo
sco/r 'm feet
WEST 1/4 COR.,SEC. 13
A�
38,000 Sgft. 010-28
LATERAL DRAINAGE
1,000, 17 AREA BOUNDARY
I( �
e
1 -29
284,800 Sq. ft. \
1 �
021-29
59,60OSq.ft.y 0
O 78, 400Sq . ft.
94
100,
021-29 i 022-29
WINDTREE ADDITION
ELRENE ROAD 8 KOST ROAD
STORM SEWER ASSESS. AREAS
CITY PROJECT N0. 589
EAGANl MINNESOTA,
iorwrstroe
J4�+ ='
Data: MAY 1
Comm. 49504
WIND
� 3rd
s..w,rr. ; +4`r
.L .ts .m...,..,.
Fig. No. 7
0
Q
O
m
W
Z
J
W
KOST
YANKEEIDOODLE ROAD
r
1
■
1 "
1
012-26
r 816450 Sq. ft.
1
■
1
■
1
050-25
some=
"TRUNK STORM SEWER
ASSESSMENT AREA
BOUNDARY.
01 1- 26
6803560 Sq,ft.
■�■�■�■�+e�■�■�■tire■�■�
o Poo 400
5co/e in fee!
ELRENE ROAD & KOST R
STORM SEINER
TRUNK ASSESS. AREA
CITY PROJECT No. 58
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
010-28
1
OA D Ion.stroo e...�,......►..�s..�.
�:lx A
L 0 Am"llame OL 04"
8 Date: MAY 1990
# Comm. 49504 F19• No. 8
WESCOTT S[3W►aa
011-02 t
014-02
1 �
- - - - CIL 20_ WA
El 24 WATER MAIPI
012-26
c
00
II
ui
l
I
1 W
I I b1 J
I !^ W
y
&011- 26
I 1- tf
I
T /N POND .P•3,
1 26
ELFdEE ROAD & KOST ROAD �or�wRa>ro� ' "• • •"'r°"«•
SANITARY SEWER & WATER MANY AnOWIlk A .
CITY Nm 588 �"•'` " ""
EAGW SSA Comm. 4950 4 90 FI 9. No. 9
/ 1011-04
Ai/ N
O /j
f
4
200 O 200
Scale in !re/
WEST 1/4 COR., SEC. 13
010-28
021-29 \
16" WATER MAIN � p
�Z
N : �0
\� 7-
021-29
o021-29 \Un-
R
WINDTREE ADDITION
ELRENE ROAD & COST ROAD
SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN
CITY PROJECT No. 580
EAGANg MINNESOTA,
l�1
a�
Oatc APRIL 1
ConVru 49504
022-29
022-29
WIND
3rd
aftatUVA.
Fig. No. 10
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
DIFFLEY CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OLDT PROPERTIES
A. Rezoning, Diffley/Cedar Planned Development, Koldt Properties, to Amend the
Splashland PD to Allow Mixed Use Multifamily Residential and Retail Development and
a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for Specification of Development within an
Existing CPD (Commercial Planned Development) Designation of Approximately 41 Acres
Located in the Northwest Section of Highway 77 and Diffley Road in the Southwest 1/4
of Section 19—The Advisory Planning Commission has considered a rezoning and
comprehensive guide plan amendment for the Diffley/Cedar Planned Development on two
occasions. The item was originally considered by the APC at its January 23, 1990 meeting
and continued to the February 22, 1990 meeting at which time it was recommended for
approval. The item was heard by the City Council at its March 6, 1990 meeting at which
time it was redirected to the APC for additional consideration of City Council concerns.
Those concerns are outlined in a memorandum from City Planner Sturm 0 the Advisory
Planning Commission dated March 27, 1990 and enclosed on page
The APC again heard this matter at its March 27, 1990 meeting and, based upon the
Council concerns, an action to reaffirm their previous approval of this item failed.
The item has been heard by the City Council at its May 1, 1990 meeting. The developer
indicated that no changes had been made to the original submission heard by the Planning
Commission at its January 23 and February 22 meetings. Following discussion of the
relative merits of the project with respect to Council concerns, the Council acted to direct
staff to work with the developer in the formulation of a development agreement to address
the Council's concerns with respect to the quality, phasing and composition of the project.
A copy of the planned elopme agre
dpement negotiated by staff and the developer is
enclosed on pages through for your review. Staff would encourage that
specific attention b given to article 3 conditions regarding development" and exhibit C
"conditions" in addition to the remainder of the agreement.
By way of backgrou d, lease refer to a Community Development staff report which is.
enclosed W. ages through refer
your review. Also enclosed on pages
through are the Advisory Planning Commission minutes of Anuary 23, February
22 andarch 27, 1990 and, finally, on pages -)-QO-1hroughQSd is a copy of the City
Council minutes of May 1, 1990 at which staff direction was provided.
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
While the appropriate order of action is to consider the comprehensive guide plan
amendment and rezoning prior to the planned development agreement, the Council may
wish to review the planned development agreement to be certain that it identifies and
addresses the concerns raised on May 1, 1990, prior to undertaking the specific actions for
rezoning and comprehensive guide plan amendment.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS rrEM: 1) To approve or deny the
comprehensive guide plan amendment for specification of a development within an existing
CPD (commercial planned development) of approximately 41 acres, 2) a rezoning of the
Diffley/Cedar Planned Development for Koldt Properties to amend the Splashland PD
to allow a mixed use multifamily residential and retail development in the northwest corner
of the intersection with Highway 77 and Diffley Road in the southwest quarter of section
19 and 3) to approve or deny the planned development agreement for Diffley/Cedar
Planned Development as presented.
/( 3
KEM0 TO: GARY GRAPES, CHAIRlSAN
JLDVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION XZM,BERS
TROM: JIM STURM, CITY BL"WER
DATE: XhACE 22, 1990
RE: DIFFLEY/CEDAR BLANKED DEVELOPMENT
On March 6, the City Council reviewed the proposed Diffley/Cedar
Planned Development and after a lengthy presentation and Council
discussion, this item was referred back to the Advisory Planning
Cc: -.,fission prior to any action taking place. The applicants were
directed to review their plans and make modifications where
pcssihle based on the following:
1. Pshlic safety and traffic concerns relating both to the
proposed development and the adjacent elementary school.
2. Fcssihility of increasing school facilities which would add
to the burden already existing on Eagan taxpayers.
3. The appropriateness of the proposed zoning R-4 since there is
r such little leeway on the upper limit of the zone for any
flexihility or later modification.
4. Conflict with Enron and cable sites and landscaping adjacent
to the site and the sites themselves.
5. Fewer units per acre would be more appropriate based on the
location, topography: existing number of multiple units in
the City and overall City planning.
If rodifications can be made, they will be presented to the
C=iission next Tuesday. This item has been scheduled for the
April 17 City Council meeting. If anyone would like further
information on this item, please feel free to contact me.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
DIFFLEY-CEDAR
This agreement, made this day of , 1990, by and
between the CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation
(hereinafter the "City") and KOLDT PROPERTIES, INC., 3663 Park Center
Boulevard, St. Louis Park, Minnesota, (hereinafter the "Applicant").
R E C I T A L S
The Applicant has made application for rezoning of approximately
41 acres located in Section 19, Township 27, Range 23, west of Trunk
Highway 77 and Diffley Road within the City of Eagan, County of
Dakota, State of Minnesota, and legally described as set forth on
Exhibit "A" (hereinafter the "Property") to a Planned Development
District Zoning and has submitted a preliminary Development Plan,
(the "Development Plan", Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part
hereof). This agreement setting forth the conditions of development
governing the Property is part of the final Development Plan. It is
the intention of the Applicant that all development and improvements
on the Property be consistent with the standards contained in this
agreement. The City intends to amend its officially adopted Land Use
Plan to reflect the pattern and intensity of land uses illustrated in
Exhibit "B".
The purpose of this agreement is to set forth the zoning
standards and conditions which will govern the development of the
Property. It is intended to cover matters relating to compliance with
the City's ordinances and not to address other issues of property
subdivision, public improvements, assessments, or other matters that
may be part of the process of development of the Property, unless
specifically set forth. This agreement contemplates the use of the
Property as set forth on Exhibit "B". Any proposed change in the use
of the Property from the uses as set forth on Exhibit "B" will
necessitate an amendment to this agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants stated
herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Recitals: The recitals contained above are expressly
incorporated in and declared to be a part of this agreement.
2. Obligation of the Applicant: The Applicant agrees that it will
develop the Property in conformance with the Eagan City Code, with
the Development Plan, and with the conditions attached thereto as
listed in Exhibit "C", which are incorporated herein by reference.
3. Condition Regarding Development:
(i) Applicant's development shall consist of no more than 108
apartment units within two 3 -story corridor buildings and no more
than 41,000 square feet of commercial space.
(ii) Except as noted in subparagraph (D), the following uses
shall be solely permitted within the area designated as Commercial as
shown on Exhibit "B".
(A) Limited Business uses;
(B) Neighborhood Business Uses; and
(C) Commercial Shopping Center Uses.
(D) The following uses shall not be allowed: outside
storage; sales or displays; automobile, trucks or recreational
vehicle sales or service; outdoor research or testing facilities;
paraphernalia shops; truck stops; animal kennels; or
motels/hotels.
(E) Any conditional use item set forth in the City Code for
the uses identified in subparagraph A, B, and C shall require
approval by the City Council pursuant to the requirements of the
City Code.
(iii) Construction of the housing units and clubhouse noted in
Phase I as shown on Exhibit "D" must be initiated prior to the
issuance of the building permit for the construction of the
commercial building(s).
(iv) The townhouse and rowhouse units in Phase I and Phase II as
shown in Exhibit "D" shall be completed prior to Applicant commencing
construction on the second 3 -story corridor apartment building, which
building is shown as part of Phase 3 on Exhibit "D".
4. Obligations of the City: The City hereby approves the
Development Plan subject to the conditions as set forth in paragraph
2 hereof, and in Exhibit "C", and further agrees to cooperate in the
approval of any site plan and final plats as may be necessary to
implement the approved Development Plan. The City reserves the right
to object to any particular element of such plans or plats which it
reasonably determines is contrary to the law, or the health, safety
or general welfare of the citizens of the City.
/q7
5. Events of Default: The term "Default" shall mean, whenever it
is used in this agreement (unless the context otherwise provides),
any one or more of the following events:
(a) Failure by the Applicant to observe or perform any covenants,
condition or obligation contained within this agreement or within the
City Code, within thirty (30) days after written notice to the
Applicant specifying the failure and requesting that it be remedied
(or within such other period as the parties may agree in writing).
(b) Failure by the Applicant to commence construction of
improvements and structures pursuant to the Development Plan within
five (5) years of the date of this agreement. If the Applicant
commences construction of improvements and structures that are
consistent with the Planned Development Agreement (e.g. mass grading,
installation of streets and utilities, platting, buildings, etc.)
upon a portion of the Property within five years of the date of this
agreement, failure of the Applicant to commence construction on any
additional portion of the Property shall not constitute a default
under this agreement, until an additional five (5) year period from
the date of this agreement has expired without further construction
of improvements and structures. In that event, the default shall only
apply to that portion of the Property upon which construction of
improvements and structures have not commenced.
ii) Whenever a default referred to in this section occurs, the
City may take one or more of the following actions, with respect to
the Property or any portion thereof which is in default:
14Y
(a) Initiate rezoning of the Property or any portion thereof
which is in default to a zoning classification consistent with the
land use designation for the Property shown in the adopted
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Eagan. The Applicant hereby waives
any right to object to such rezoning or to notice of the hearing.
(b) Declare null and void any building and site plans or
Development plans approved pursuant to the Planned Development
Ordinance.
(c) Refuse building or other permits.
(d) Stop work on Applicant's project through the issuance of stop
work orders.
(e) Take whatever action at law or in equity as may appear
necessary or desirable to the City to enforce performance and
observation of any obligations, agreements or covenants of the
Applicant under this agreement.
iii) The term "event of default by the City" shall mean, whenever
it is used in this agreement, (unless the context otherwise provides)
a failure by the City to observe or perform any covenant, condition
or obligation under this agreement on its part, within thirty (30)
days after written notice to the City specifying the failure and
requesting that it be remedied (or within such other period as the
parties may agree in writing).
Whenever any event of default by the City occurs, the applicant
may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or
desirable to the Applicant to enforce performance and observance of
r q?
any obligation, agreements or covenant of the city under this
agreement.
7. Waiver of Claims: The Applicant expressly waives any claims
against the City of Eagan or its employees or agents for actions
taken in good faith in the exercise of the remedies for default
specified above.
S. Notice & Demands: A notice, demand or other communication
under this agreement by either party to the other shall be
sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and
addressed to the party and its attorney at the addresses listed
below. Either party may designate another address or attorney for
receipt of notice under this section by designating in writing, and
forwarding such writing, to the other party as provided in this
section.
In the case of the City, notices shall be mailed to City of
Eagan, Attention: City Administrator, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box
21199, Eagan, Minnesota 55121.
In the case of the Applicant, notice shall be mailed to:
Koldt Properties, Inc.
Suite 1311
3663 Park Center Boulevard
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
9. Amendments: This agreement may be amended in writing from time
to time as the parties shall mutually agree. Furthermore, the plans,
standards, stipulations, and other information constituting the
Development Plan and conditions, may be amended upon application by
15c,
the Applicant and approval of the City pursuant to Eagan City Code.
Amendments to the Development Plan and conditions, once approved,
shall become part of this Agreement, fully binding upon the parties,
as if fully set forth herein.
10. Exhibits: The exhibits attached hereto and incorporated
herein and made reference to are made a part of this agreement. The
exhibits are:
Exhibit A Legal Description
Exhibit B Development Plan
Exhibit C Conditions
Exhibit D Phasing
Exhibit E Landscaping
Exhibit F Architecture
11. Successors & Assians. This agreement shall be binding upon
and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective
successors and assigns.
12. Recordin7: This agreement shall run with the subject land and
may be recorded in the Office of the Dakota County Recorder or
Registrar of Titles.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
agreement on the day and year first above written.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF EAGAN,
a Minnesota municipal
corporation
City Attorney's Office
Dated:
By: Thomas A. Egan
Its: Mayor
/V
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Public Works Department
Dated:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
By: E. J. VanOverbeke
Its: City Clerk
KOLDT PROPERTIES, INC.,
a Minnesota corporation
By: _
Its:
By: _
Its:
On this day of 1 1990, before me a Notary
Public within and for said County, personally appeared THOMAS A. EGAN
and E. J. VanOVERBEKE to me personally known, who being each by me
duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and
Clerk of the City of Eagan, the municipality named in the foregoing
instrument, and that the seal affixed on behalf of said municipality
by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk
acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said
municipality.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of
Public within and
appeared
Notary Public
for said
and
1990, before me a Notary
County, personally
to me
/S�
personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that
they are respectively the
and of the corporation named in the
foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is
the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was
signed and sealed on behalf of said corporation by authority of its
Board of Directors and said
and acknowledged said instrument to be the
free act and deed of the corporation.
City Attorney's Office
Dated:
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Public Works Department
Dated:
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
SEVERSON, WILCOX & SHELDON, P.A.
600 Midway National Bank Bldg.
7300 West 147th Street
Apple Valley, MN 55124
(612) 432-3136
MGD
Notary Public
� S-3
EXHIBIT A
�s�
'h .� .:74�',{� 41 f twi t+yJ.�:T`•V' Qi - 75-:_ ,°:•,, .1
oZ
-
vM.
f � {� *� � � \\ \ e : 'qty„L' ;;-. � •.,.'r � y._ �
x
„ - ♦
N
`,R IL
;- 1 r -
I
\.
tc
\ \ \ \``�° \\
.]-HY ..� _��y Y. .:T' 9 �T.tr ,.� Vel �• �`\
5-5
�
yNVVj
♦,
aw
O
M
y
n
'
'h .� .:74�',{� 41 f twi t+yJ.�:T`•V' Qi - 75-:_ ,°:•,, .1
oZ
-
vM.
f � {� *� � � \\ \ e : 'qty„L' ;;-. � •.,.'r � y._ �
x
„ - ♦
N
`,R IL
;- 1 r -
I
\.
tc
\ \ \ \``�° \\
.]-HY ..� _��y Y. .:T' 9 �T.tr ,.� Vel �• �`\
5-5
�
yNVVj
♦,
O
M
y
n
'
U
v
c° t°- <F•�
66
n��
a
;;.7;^+_'•.._? .,.
0
'h .� .:74�',{� 41 f twi t+yJ.�:T`•V' Qi - 75-:_ ,°:•,, .1
oZ
-
vM.
f � {� *� � � \\ \ e : 'qty„L' ;;-. � •.,.'r � y._ �
x
„ - ♦
N
`,R IL
;- 1 r -
I
\.
tc
\ \ \ \``�° \\
.]-HY ..� _��y Y. .:T' 9 �T.tr ,.� Vel �• �`\
5-5
EXHIBIT C
1. Applicant shall develop the Property in conformance with the
Eagan City Code or Ordinances and shall be required to obtain all
necessary permits and licenses required to develop the Property
consistent with this agreement.
2. The rowhouse and townhouse units shall provide for washers and
dryers and have individual utility metering.
3. The entire Property shall have a lawn irrigation installed.
4. Approximately 50% of the rowhouse and townhouse units and
approximately 25% of apartment units shall have fireplaces.
5. The clubhouse as shown and noted on Exhibit "B" shall be
constructed as part of the first phase of development of the Property
as noted on Exhibit "D".
6. Prior to initial development of the Property, the Applicant
shall submit a detailed landscaping plan to the City for its review
and approval in conformance with the submitted plan as shown and
noted on Exhibit "E".
7. Prior to initial development of the Property, the Applicant
shall submit detailed construction plans for all building to the City
for its review and approval in conformance with the submitted plans
as shown and noted on Exhibit "F".
S. Materials used in the construction of the building on the
Property shall be submitted to the City for its review and approval
and shall be in conformance with the submitted plans as shown and
noted on Exhibit "F" and shall have a minimum of 50% maintenance -free
exterior.
IL
d
A \
;57
m
�
_
CO
r
N y
�"^ ;..`t;.w• i ,.. 1 �,� ,�Y��d: rit�.� _ f.�i+�\� -h .tom i ',Etl i i � � b d —� <G L8 f � r
_ice _� '`,? �:c,,;•.��r d� ��. Q tl �F<F F Q c�c o. n. ►�, a H
� 7 -z -
alp
cV
\ � +�. � \'.�-' 'I � t � s _ � ♦♦ ��;.��. ,, � . �` \ 1 1 "'t+ -cam
NONa
err+♦-. — � � ♦♦♦\v\^,• � ��
,�� � . = -� � _ _ ♦ �(�� 111 ���VJ1 j '' \ `` ..; �
IV
ot
tire
ZQ\\ \2� •._- r � - -- \ �' _�` r •i�r� iia■+�'-�- ;*' - \
\ ` \ 1 1)11 } ( �?A \ a \�•`. ``. % � � r g
A \
;57
°- •^• � � i w a � � �
u �
G131
Q gCg I
4)7
�I ZI � Gg �i IS S7 ��C�` • �� �7j S�� ��� ��<���
,
Q _ '
ZZ
x
',, .—e `\� � �.,\ � _yam �/ ••( I { � j , �,
, '.` ` �`1 ,� R fes:\�. v^�yh`,1`�,' � j�\; �•` � x. �,' ( rr' � gyp/
_ ` \ �': �-� ' S , s:'ti �~•. _' b, r�`� ,. i . - `sem_.. •, � y .I � I r
\, f ti,'l� •; .;``' �\k I :�:? R if
21
`••\ \ .} � = � �°� +..�L • , C � � � •.1 - �' • o ,..:ai+>` x'149 I v
W71 M_
• _ q,r�.w���,* ry. -,_T _._..__ - � l�1_ ��' `k ��` ply-` \ J. Q ___ --
�s8
4�.y
C
C
• �
X7'1
J�
O `vLi
wHA.
�.i_�
M
..�
.�
Go
4w
7 N
V)
oL4
"
W
� cn
■ a ■ _ ;
ce (
1
0
V
1
.^
7'. i
W
i
cr
'+ a
"L�
t_Ftt
1j4
�illyyy�
22
!1
cmc �
Y il�.
■ r
��
■ua
W
�w
■ gxa
■ � e
a
�-
ce (
1
0
N -s
w v
c o o
W Hw ■ a ■ —o
to
• �
III II
•
�II
I
I
�I
1 )
�
IIII
i
i
I
I i
i I
I•
I
I
1
1
•IIh
l
�I
G
c
�I
0
x
N -s
w v
c o o
W Hw ■ a ■ —o
to
0
i
i
I
I i
i I
I•
I
I
1
1
•IIh
to
0
• ,x
Rti I
t.
11'1
I^
a
• t"3
< a°O
11'1
I^
�
LE
V
• j � i
I
I
!,
'I
D
w
a�
� W ■
I
LE
• j � i
I
I
!,
'I
lii',i
Ica
dam,
bo
MEMO To: GARY GRAVES, CHAIRMAN
AsDVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION NI ERS
FROM: JIM STORM, CITY PLANNER
DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1990
RE: DIFFLEY/CEDAR PIJYNED DZ"LOPMENT
At the January 23 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, this item
was continued at the applicant's request prior to action by the
Commission so they could review the concerns expressed that night
and to see if possible modifications to the site plan could be
made.
Since that time, the following changes have occurred:
The retail square footage has been reduced from 73,000
sq. ft. to 41,000 sq. ft. which includes a 28,000 sq. ft.
retail center and two free-standing pads containing 5,000
and 8,000 sq. ft., respectively.
For comparison purposes, the Eagan Convenience Center along
Duckwood Drive containing the Dairy Queen is approximately 18,000
sq. ft. and Thomas Lake Center consists of approximately 43,000 sq.
ft. in the retail building alone (not including any free-standing
pads.)
The total number of residential units has been lowered by 17% from
494 to 412. The previous proposal had two 140 unit apartment
clusters. The revised plan has one 108 unit apartment grouping.
The overall density has been reduced from 15.8 units/acre to 11.9
units/acre. The Commission also requested further review of the
relocation of the Cable TV/North Central facility. The applicants
have stated their desire to accomplish this and another exhibit has
been attached showing how the site would ultimately be designed if
the relocation took place. The original staff report has been
attached and all conditions still apply.
Citf Planner
JS/js
F-1
1
m
LLL
LE.
0
U
W
L
�*k
r
F-1
1
m
LLL
LE.
0
U
W
L
\� 1
r
SUBJECT: COMPRERENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT,
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (REZONING)
DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
APPLICANT: ROLDT PROPERTIES
LOCATION: B"R 1/4 OF SECTION 19
EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)
DATE OF PUBLIC 88ARINO: %TANUARY 23, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: .TANUARY 17, 1990
COMPILED BY: COKK7,h`ITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted
requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Rezoning of
the existing Splashland Planned Development to allow a mixed use
multi -family and retail development on approximately 41 acres along
the north side of Diffley Road and west of Cedar Avenue. The
City's Land Use Plan designates this area as CPD (Commercial
Planned Development).
BACKGROUND: This area was rezoned in 1982 from GB (General
Business) to the Bluffview Planned Development consisting of 17
acres, allowing a motel/hotel, offices, and other GB uses.
However, nothing was constructed and -in 1985 the area was increased
to approximately 33 acres and the Splashland Planned Development
and Preliminary Plat were approved. Splashland would have been a
water theme park, but the Final Plat was never completed. The
current applicants wanted to include the Cable TV North Central
site, but over the past months they have been unable to reach an
agreement on the terms and the relocation of the existing facility.
The intent was to move the studios into the proposed retail center
and remodel the building for clubhouse purposes. The applicants
would still like to acquire the site in the future if negotiations
can be worked out. This revised site plan has reduced the retail
component from 100,000 sq. ft. to 73,500 sq. ft., including a
55,000 sq. ft. retail center with three free-standing pads
consisting of 7,500, 6,500, and 4,500 sq. ft. building pads.
There are three building styles proposed in the residential area,
instead of the two originally shown. They include: a townhouse
style unit, smaller three story type apartment building with
private entrances, and the typical elevator type apartment
building. The applicant feels that a mixed use, multi -family and
neighborhood commercial development is an appropriate use of the
site because it can be developed as an identifiable community with
strong physical boundaries. The commercial development along
Diffley Road will reinforce its image as a commercial street and
the residential development will take advantage of the views
towards the Minnesota River.
EEIST12;G CONDITIONS: The site is highly visible as one enters
Eagan from the north. The applicant is proposing to take advantage
of the panoramic views towards the Minnesota River where the
vertical distance between this site and the river is over 100 ft.
The land is open grassland, falling gradually towards the northeast
property lines where it then falls dramatically. Adjacent land
uses are: the Superamerica store to the west, E -Z Mini -storage to
the north, Cedar Avenue to the east, and Metcalf Jr. High School
to the south. Enron Gas Company is also along the northeast corner
of this site.
LNRON GAS CO1KPANY: Enron's major concern was having direct access
to their facility, as well as the buried gas lines on the site.
Enron, Minnegasco, NSP, and Peoples Natural Gas are users of this
facility. This facility is NSP's main feeder to St. Paul and
Minnegasco's to the north. The facility is a point of exchange
where gas supplied by Enron is distributed into local utility
pipelines. Gas pressure is also reduced from the trunk lines to
the local lines. Enron typically generates two to three trips to
the site a week, along with monthly inspections of the utility
easements. Service -type vehicles are smaller trucks and pickups;
big vehicles are only needed in the event of an emergency or
necessary major repair. If there was a gas leak, there would be
little or no chance of an explosion since gas is lighter than air
and it would naturally dissipate. The Moundsview pipeline fire a
couple of years ago was a gasoline fire.
PROJECT SCOPE: The site plan shows 31.1 acres of housing with the
following breakdown:
2 140 unit apartment courts 280 units
2 90,000 & 60,000 unit clusters 156 units
of smaller style apartments
48 unit rental townhouses 48 units
Total Units: 484 units
This adds up to 15.6 units per gross acre. The retail area with
a total building square footage of 73,500 sq. ft. on ten acres has
a gross lot coverage under 174. Limited Business and Neighborhood
Business zoning districts allow 204 coverage, with other districts
either 30 or 354. The applicant feels that the approximately
4,000,000 sq. ft. mall Of America in Bloomington will be a major
contributor to the development of this site since it will employ
approximately 5,000 people.
The residential component will consist of three housing types: an
eight unit townhouse style building with attached garages, a
rowhouse style building with individual entries and underground
parking, and a three story apartment building with elevators and
heated underground parking. In addition, a 5,000 sq. ft. clubhouse
will be constructed at the entry to the residential development.
V"P
i
The clubhouse will be the visual focal point for the development.
It will feature steeply pitched roofs, tall interior volumes, and
expansive windows to take advantage of views to the west and north.
It will house the management and leasing offices, party room,
recreational amenities, a-nd outdoor swimming pool overlooking the
river valley.
The eight unit townhouse style buildings with attached garages will
feature stepped roof massing ranging from one story over the end
garages to three stories at the center.. Each unit will have on -
grade entries and each building will have one and two story
dwelling units ranging in size from 1,030 sq. ft. to 1,350 sq. ft.
The three story rowhouse building is unique to the Minneapolis -St.
Paul market. It offers the identity and feel of townhouse
buildings by having individual on -grade entries for each unit. A
primary benefit of this plan is the development of courtyards that
will feature entry doors and bay windows and that will express the
smaller scale of individual units. The underground parking will
accommodate 1-1/2 cars per dwelling unit, which will allow more
landscaping in the entry courts.
The elevator apartment homes with underground parking are grouped
in two neighborhoods, one at the north end of the site with views
over the river valley, and one at the southeast edge of the site
visible from the main entrance. The shape of these buildings
maximize views and encloses landscaped courtyards. Unit sizes will
range from studios, 815 sq. ft. one bedrooms, to 1,200 sq. ft. two
bedroom units.
The architectural treatment will emphasize traditional elements
including steep pitched roofs, bay windows, covered balconies, and
enclosed screen porches.. The townhouse style buildings will be
massed and detailed as a large country house with prominent
chimneys. The rowhouse building will feature articulated entries
and facades, and the elevator apartment homes will emphasize a
contemporary architecture, and will develop a strong end profile
of paired chimneys visible from the valley and Cedar Avenue bridge.
The primary exterior materials will be brick, stucco and horizontal
lap siding.
PROJECT TRAM: Pfister Architects of Minneapolis are the project
designers. They were the architects for the Thomas Lake Pointe
apartments along Thomas Lake Road. They also did the design work
for the Residences at Edinborough in Brooklyn Park, the Bristol
Apartments in Bloomington and the exterior of the Timberwolves
arena presently under construction in Minneapolis. The developer,
E.J. Plesko & Associates/Roldt Properties of St. Louis Park had
developed major projects throughout the country and locally have
completed a 227 -unit Radisson/Ridgedale Hotel in Minnetonka, Market
Plaza Retail Center and Tower in Richfield consisting of a 166 -unit
highrise located at West 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue and
Parkshore Place, a 13 -story 207 -unit, senior care center near
Byerly's off Highway 100 in St. Louis Park.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: Although no grading, drainage
and erosion control plan was submitted at this time with this
application, the development in concept proposes a single area
which may potentially store storm water runoff. The existing
drainage over the proposed development is generally northeasterly
toward Cedar Avenue. The City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan
shows this area tributary to Pond AP -6. Pond AP -6 is a designated
ponding area in the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Pond
AP -6 is located north of the E -Z Mini Storage Facility and
southerly of the Cedar Avenue/T.H. 13 interchange.
An area of increasing sensitivity for the City is the impact of
development on downstream waterbodies receiving site generated
storm water runoff. No water quality analysis was performed at
this point but the development will be subject to a detailed
analysis and subsequent requirements when the development reaches
the platting stages of development.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity
to provide service to the proposed development is readily available
along the westerly side of the property. No sanitary sewer trunk
improvements are required as a result of the proposed development.
A 12" trunk water main service has been provided to the proposed
development in two locations. With the construction of the Cedar
Avenue Freeway, a 12" trunk water main was stubbed to the
development's northeasterly corner. A 12" trunk water main also
exists along the westerly and northwesterly boundaries of the
property beginning at Diffley Road and extending northerly and
northeasterly. The City's Water Supply & Distribution Plan
identifies the need for the connection of the existing 12" trunk
water main stubbed to the easterly property line during the
construction of the Cedar Avenue Freeway and connecting this 12"
stub to the existing 12" line at the corner of Diffley Road and Old
Highway 13. This 12" trunk water main connection connects the
City's intermediate pressure zone with the low pressure zone. The
connection of the two different pressure zones will require the
installation of a pressure reducing station. The installation of
the pressure reducing station is a responsibility of the City's
Water Supply Trunk Fund as is the oversizing costs associated with
the 12" trunk water main required through this site.
@TREETB ACCZSS/CIRCUL!`T10 N: Street widths, easement requirements
and right-of-way widths will be addressed in detail as a part of
the final platting of the proposed development.
IWEAGAN
kp� 19
COMMUNICATIONS
z COMMISSION
/ 3E30 PILOT KNOB ROAD. PO BOX 21199, EAGAN. UN $5121
612 454.8100
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY PLANNER STURM 4W.J
FROM: CABLE COORDINATOR REARDON DATE: JANUARY 18, 1990
SUBJECT: DIFFLEY/CEDAR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT RE: CABLE TV
As per our recent conversation, I understand the portion of this
proposed development that included the Cable TV North Central site,
has been removed from the proposal. This information was relayed
to the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission at their January 11th
meeting.
There was one concern was raised at the meeting. The Commission
asked that any construction, that may take place on the proposed
site, be subject to review as to the impact it may have on the
operations of Cable TV North Central's system. Specifically, there
is a concern that the sight lines for the satellite dishes and
tower be not obstructed or so that any structure not interfere with
the reception of signals.
When and at such time the concept for the proposal be approved, I
ask that a condition be included, as and when you determine
appropriate, for an analysis of signal interruption/interference.
If you have any further Questions regarding this item, or if I or
the Cable Commission can be of any further assistance regarding the
proposal, please do not besitate to contact me.
(-73
DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DMLOPXZNT CONDITIONS
1. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a
five year period.
2. A phasing plan shall be submitted with the Preliminary Plat
of the 1st Addition.
3. An overall landscape plan shall be prepared.
4. An overall sign agreement shall be entered into.
5. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened.
6. An overall design theme shall be carried out in the
residential area.
7. All commercial areas shall be constructed with the same
materials with all sides of the buildings being constructed
of the same material.
S. All trash/recycling areas shall be contained within the
buildings.
9. All applicable environmental permits shall be obtained.
10. The development is subject to additional requirements as
identified by City staff during the platting phases of
development necessary to provide adequate public
infrastructure facilities to service the development.
ITS
� � a
Jill ■ � ■ � �' � ■
Ff
*,�4_x,. "
EA
• fit z
all
Bit 86 3 I
-
tr
I
•
4
Im
MEMORANDUM
TO. TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DALE RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER
DATE: APRIL 27, 1990
RE: DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
The foIlowing is a chronology of the proposed Dif0ey/Cedar Planned Development located
on 41 acres in the northwest corner of the intersection of Cedar Avenue and Diffley Road.'
This site includes the existing 33 acre Splashland Planned Development and 11 acres of
existing Light Industrial zoned property. This area was rezoned in 1982 from GB (General
Business) to the Bluffview Planned Development consisting of 17 acres, allowing a
hotel,�motel, offices, and other GB uses. However, nothing was constructed and in 1985,
the area was increased to approximately 33 acres and the Splashland Planned
Development and Preliminary Plat were approved. Splashland would have been a water
theme park, but the Final Plat was never completed.
In January 1990, a public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission with the
applicant requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Planned
Development Amendment to allow a mixed-use P.D. consisting of 73,500 sq. ft. of retail
space (including three small pad locations) and 484 multi -family housing units. Three
housing building styles were proposed ... the typical three story type building, a rowhouse
style with underground parking, and townhouse scale units. They had 280, 156, and 48
units, respectively.
The gross density was 15.06 units per acre and the retail lot coverage was 17%. Limited
Business and Neighborhood Business districts allow 20% coverage, with other commercial
districts either 30.35%. There was no one from the public at that meeting. After a lengthy
discussion, there was strong direction given to the applicant to lower the density and
square footage of the retail space and the item was unanimously continued until the
February meeting so the applicant could take into consideration the concerns expressed
by the Commission.
In February, the Commission reviewed revised plans that reduced the retail square footage
from 73,500 to 41,000 sq. ft. which included two free-standing pads and a 28,000 sq. ft.
retail center. For comparison purposes, the Thomas Lake Center is 43,000 sq. ft. The
residential units were lowered by 17% to 412, with more emphasis on smaller scale
l77
buildings. Only one typical three-story apartment building was proposed. The total
density was lowered to 11.09 units per acre on the line between the Comprehensive Guide
Plan designation of D -III (6-12 units per acre) and D -IV (12+ units). The item was
approved unanimously. At the March 6 City Council meeting, the item was referred back
to the Advisory Planning Commission based upon the following:
1. Public safety and traffic concerns relating both to the proposed development and
adjacent elementary school.
2 Possibility of increasing school facilities which would add to the burden already
existing on Eagan taxpayers.
3. The appropriateness of the proposed zoning R-4 since there is such little leeway on
the upper limit of the zone for any flexibility or later modification.
4. Conflict with Enron and Cable sites and landscaping adjacent to the site and the sites
themselves.
S. Fewer units per acre would be more appropriate based on the location,
topography...existing number of multiple units in the City and overall City planning.
At the March 27 APC meeting, the applicants again presented their plan to the
Commission. No changes were proposed by the applicant since they felt they previously
reduced the project as much as the- ;possibly could, and they now had a more desirable
housing mix. The discussion revolved around the Council concerns. There was a motion
to reaffirm the February meeting vote to approve the proposal, however that motion failed
with a 2!5 vote. Two Commission members who voted against the motion were not
present at the February APC meeting. Since that time, the applicants have been working
to address issues raised by the City Council dealing with the impact on City systems
including the fire department, police department, traffic along Diffley Road, and the
Burnsville School district. It appears that City services are not negatively impacted by the
proposed development, however the police information shows there are more calls to
rental housing than owner -occupied units.
Attached are copies of the correspondence, as well as a breakdown of vacancy rates in
rental housing provided by the Dakota County HRA and a listing of all rezonings from
R4s to other districts in Eagan since January 1987. Four hundred ten acres have been
changed to date. ,F-sbFaaFy, and -3
--�e
&w, If you would like additional information, please advise.
JS/js
Attach.
REVISED PLAN
FEBRUARY 1990
i �
�';;. #
li!i ■ � . iJ
•Y
x;z
s<\
t
war
A
�S&loww',,
1�j
P
Fire department
3795 No: Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122.1316
Phone (612;45x•5274
TO: Jim Sturm, City Planner
FROM: Ken Southorn, Fire Chief
DATE: April 16, 1990
RE: DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLAI'\'?\'ED DEVELOPMENT
THOMAS EGAN
Mayor
DAVID K. GUSTArSON
PAMELA WCREA
TIM PAWLENTr
THEODORE WAC -+TER
Counc-i Wr ovs
THOMAS HEDGES
Crty Aa^ in stwor
EUGENE VAN OVEKEEKE
Crty Ccr.
In reference to your inquiry on the impact this proposal will have upon fire protection
services in the City, I can offer the following comments:
• From the information you have supplied, I do not detect any unique hazards in
the proposal.
• M} main concern with this, or any other large complex, is to have access to two
or three sides of each structure to facilitate fire suppression or rescue operations.
• Adequate street widths and driveways are needed to allow fire apparatus to
maneuver.
• Historically, multiple housing units have created additional calls resulting from
unfounded alarms.
• The Fire Department would appreciate the opportunity to review plans of the
project as it progresses.
This proposal does not appear to pose any unusual conditions for fire services if adequate
access if provided.
KRS/tp
MSturtn.ItRS \%t
THE LONE OAK TREE—THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
KEN SOUTNORti
Chc,
DICK SCHINDELDECKER
Ass•6canr Cnc'
1tv of aingan
DAVE DI IOtA
Dmnc.Cl�c'
3795 No: Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122.1316
Phone (612;45x•5274
TO: Jim Sturm, City Planner
FROM: Ken Southorn, Fire Chief
DATE: April 16, 1990
RE: DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLAI'\'?\'ED DEVELOPMENT
THOMAS EGAN
Mayor
DAVID K. GUSTArSON
PAMELA WCREA
TIM PAWLENTr
THEODORE WAC -+TER
Counc-i Wr ovs
THOMAS HEDGES
Crty Aa^ in stwor
EUGENE VAN OVEKEEKE
Crty Ccr.
In reference to your inquiry on the impact this proposal will have upon fire protection
services in the City, I can offer the following comments:
• From the information you have supplied, I do not detect any unique hazards in
the proposal.
• M} main concern with this, or any other large complex, is to have access to two
or three sides of each structure to facilitate fire suppression or rescue operations.
• Adequate street widths and driveways are needed to allow fire apparatus to
maneuver.
• Historically, multiple housing units have created additional calls resulting from
unfounded alarms.
• The Fire Department would appreciate the opportunity to review plans of the
project as it progresses.
This proposal does not appear to pose any unusual conditions for fire services if adequate
access if provided.
KRS/tp
MSturtn.ItRS \%t
THE LONE OAK TREE—THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
CRIME SUMMARY FOR 1989
YY _LOCATION
ASSAULT
TOTAL REPORTED FOR 1989 311
BY LOCATION OCCURRED:
RENTAL RESIDENCE 151 OR 49%
NON -RENTAL RESIDENCE 103 OR 33%
OTHER 57 OR 18%
CRIME AGAINST FAMILY
TOTAL REPORTED FOR 1989 135
BY LOCATION OCCURRED:
RENTAL RESIDENCE 63 OR 47%
NON -RENTAL RESIDENCE 68 OR 50%
OTHER 4 OR 3%
CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT
TOTAL REPORTED FOR 1989 45
BY LOCATION OCCURRED:
RENTAL RESIDENCE 15 OR 33%
NON -RENTAL RESIDENCE 24 OR 53%
OTHER 6 OR 13%
*OTHER -INCLUDES BUSINESSES, PARKS, STREETS, AND ALL PUBLIC AREAS.
(el
rm%aftLr ru'jlL z AZeUKT
AS OF 11/1/89 THERE ARE 17,900 DWELLING UNITS IN THE CITY OF EAGAN.
(STATISTIC FROM KRISTY MARNIN, CITY OF EAGAN/PLANNING DEPT.)
TOTAL NUMBER OF RENTAL UNITS IN CITY OF EAGAN ARE 5,021.
(FROM RENTAL LISTING 1/1/891 CITY OF EAGAN.)
BASED ON ABOVE TWO FIGURES, RENTALS ACCOUNT FOR 28% OF CITY OF
EAGAN'S DWELLING UNITS.
TOTAL NUMBER OF RENTAL DWELLINGS
TOTAL NUMBER OF NON -RENTAL DWELLINGS
TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLINGS:
5,021 OR 28%
12,879 OR 72%
17,900
THOMAS LAKE POINTE POLICE CALLS
OR 17, 1990, 1:15 PM SINCE 1987 PAGE 1
CASE -"P
..............
71HE->RECEIVEO CALL -CODE CALL-CODE-DESCR
.......................................................................
CALL -LOCATION
90/0313C 19:47:08 9860
SUSS ACTIVITY
1510 TMOMAS LAKE PT #102
90/03/30 19:47:50 9860
SUSP ACTIVITY
1510 THOMAS LAKE PT #102
90/03/30 20:07:DD 9310
FOUND CAT
1520 THOMAS LAKE PT
90/0&101 20:02:20 9800
PISCELLAMEAOJS
1530 THOMAS LAKE PT #113
90/04/05 00:32:34 9100
PARK
1510 TNOMAS LAKE PT
CR SM25467
87/12/30 13:15:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
THOMAS LAKE APT
C18700003844
87/03/01 12:27:00 9916
SECURITY CHECKS
THOMAS LAKE PT
037DOOD6592
87/64/12 17:55:00 P3310
TRESPASS -%S -PRI
THOMAS LAKE APTS
CR87OM47D
87/05/23 09:40:00 P3139
PROF DAMAGE -MS-
TNO4AS LAKE APTS
C287DO012660
67/07/01 06:26:00 9991
CITY ORD VIO-OTN
TMOMAS LAKE APTS
CR87DO012724
87/07/01 21:49:00 96DO
FIRE
TNOIAS LAKE APARTMENTS
a87DOO14777
87/07/27 17:56:00 74159
THEFT -5250 LESS
TNOMAS LAKE PT APARTMENTS
CR6700017397
87/09/01 12:30:00 93190
DISTURI PEACE -M
1510 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRB700020391
87/10116 15:40:00 74029
THEFT -S250 LESS
1540 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CR8700020784
87/10/22 11:29:00 9600
FIRE -MULTIPLE DW
1510 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8700022969
87/11/24 01:50:00 12099
THEFT -5251-5250
THOMAS LAKE POINT APT
C18800D00526
88/01/09 23:49:00 9800
911 14ISDIALS
1520 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8800002386
B8/C21C7 14:51:00 9720
MEDICALS
1520 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
COSED0002428
88/C210! 13:00:00 9103
PUBLIC ASSIST
1530 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8800003868
81/03/94 06:22:0" 9600
MISCELLANEOUS
1540 TNCKAS LAKE PT
CRB800004877
BEIl,71 04:18:00 83070
DISTURB PEACE -M
THOMAS LAKE POINTE APT
CRBSD0006C96
88/04108 G7:5D:00 9035
SCHOOL BUS VIOLA
THOMAS LAKE RD A THOMAS LAKE PT
08800006162
BE/04/09 OC:57:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1530 THOMAS LAKE PT
CWBSDD006654
88/04/16 11:59:00 98^3
PUBLIC ASSIST
1530 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CRBSDD007345
81/04/2!✓ 17:25:00 W3190
DISTURB PEACE -M
1520 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRM°"1007422
88/04/27 22:01:00 9830
M;A>N PURCHASE -TRA
1520 THOMAS LAKE P1
CRE 37636
88/04/311 21:45:00 9011
SPEEDING
THOMAS LAKE PT
CR68OOD08D94
88/05/06 22:37:00 A9501
TERROR-TMRT IMF
1520 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRUDDOOS169
86/0511'7 19:35:0" A9501
TERROR-TMRT IMF
1520 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR88000090C2
86/05111 23:50:00 N3070
DISTURB PEACE -M
1530 THOMAS LAKE P1
CR88000019160
88/CS/20 2:•:41:00 9720
MEDICALS
1520 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRBBDD010475
88/06/05 16.45:00 V4110
THEFT -PARTS FRO
1520 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRBBDD010543
98/06/ 7 14:06:00 9934
ASSIST OTHER DEP
1530 THOMAS LAKE P1
"/28800010131
98/06/11 20:20:00 9520
NOME ACCIDENTS -P
1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
"/28800011276
80/06/18 01":28:00 93070
DISTURB PEACE -M
1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRBBODDI1730
88/06/24 19:03:00 9603
PUBLIC ASSIST
1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
C25800012174
80/06/3+; 23:08:00 9860
SUSP PERSON
THOMAS LAKE APT
CRB800012176
98/06/30 23:21:00 94199
LIQUOR - OTHER
1530 THOMAS LAKE PT
028800013333
80/07/16 01:30:D0 9720
MEDICALS
1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR980D013609
98/07/22 23:24:00 93070
DISTURB PEACE -M
1530 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CRUDD013820
61/07/23 02:55:00 U307D
DISTURB PEACE -M
1540 THOMAS LAKE POINT RD
CR8800014418
88/07/31 16:53:00 A9500
TERROR-TMRT INF
1540 TOWS LAKE PT
CR880DO15081
98/08/10 20:15:00 9835
CIVIL MATTERS
1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRBBDDDI5571
68/06/18 20:03:00 T2029
THEFT -5251.52500
1510 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRUD00157D6
88/06/21 01:14:00 M3070
DISTURI PEACE -M
1500 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRs800015714
98/06/21 02:04:00 93070
DISTURB PEACE -M
1540 TMOMAS LAKE PT
CRSB00016443
88/09/01 12:41:00 9520
NOME ACCIDENTS
1520 TNOMAS LAKE PT
CRB600D16602
56/09/03 20:04:00 9903
"LIC ASSIST
1520 TMCMAS LAKE PT RD
08600017223
U/09/13 22:51:00 9934
ASSIST OTHER DEP
1530 THOMAS LAKE POINT RD
CIBBOOD17584
88/09/19 22:51:00 9960
SUSP PERSON
THOMAS LAKE APT
CISM018255
B8/09/29 11:42:00 9720
MEDICALS
1540 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CRs 1376
68/101."•1 13:15:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1530 TNOMAS LAKE P1 RD
CR88DU018:41
91/10/10 19:42:00 9020
CARELESS/EKHIIIT
TNOMAS LAKE i THOMAS LAKE PT
CR6800019309
80;10/16 14:59:00 9560
SJSP PERSON
WOWS MR THOMAS LAKE APT
CR000020617
88/11/09 11:18:00 9011
SPEEDING
THOMAS LAKE RD 9 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRBB00020729
81/11/10 15:07:00 AA.355
ASL7 5-INfL1C1'
153/1 AKE PT
TM>F, APR 17, 1990, 1.15 PM
f
'
CASE-NBR
..................---------..........-----..........----...----------------------------------
TIME -RECEIVED CALL -CODE CALL-COOE-DESCR CALL -LOCATION
CR8800020760
88/11/11 02:50:00 9070
EQUIPMENT VIOLAT THOMAS LAKE PT
CRIM21276
88/11/19 23:23:00 X3190
DISTURB PEACE -M 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8800022082
88/12/04 0B:00:D0 9991
JUNK ORD VIOLATI 1520 THOMAS LAKE PT
CISM22821
88/12117 16:58:00 9105
HANDICAPPED PARK 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT
:!8800023278
88/12/26 20:35:00 9000
RM AND DRIVING 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CRUN023304
88/12/27 02:12:00 9700
SUICIDE -THREATEN 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CR89000DO779
89/01/14 08:37:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST 1520 TNOMAS LAKE PT RD
CR89000D0786
89/01/14 15:13:00 9835
CIVIL MATTERS 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CR8900D01224
89/01/21 18:19:00 9801
DOMESTICS 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT
CAM002085
89/02/06 19:15:00 9600
FIRE 1510 TNOMAS LAKE PT
CR8900002488
89/D2/13 18:54:00 9520
!TOME ACCIDENTS 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
089OM3241
89/02/24 22:03:DD 9801
DOMESTICS 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8900003326
89/02/26 10:36:00 9301
LOST PERSON 1540 TNOMAS LAKE PT RD
C18900003459
89/03/01 00:20:00 9830
ON PURCHASE -TRA 1510 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRMD03932
89/03109 12:34:00 P3119
PROP DAMAGE -MS- 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8900004023
89/03/10 19:30:00 C1211
FORGERY-FE-UTT 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT
CROMOO4110
89/03/12 02:08:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8900004323
89/03/15 16:44 -DO N3190
DISTURB PEACE -M 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT 214
CIRMOD4452
89/03/17 12:39:00 9870
INTELLIGENCE -PUB 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
[*8900006531
89/06/20 12:27:00 74159
THEFT -5250 LESS 1520 THOMAS LAKE PINTS
CR8900006548
89/04/20 16:39:00 74159
THEFT -S250 LESS 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CR890DD06900
89/04/26 D4:11:00 9960
SUSPICIOUS ACTIV THOMAS LAKE PT t THOMAS LAKE DR
08900007861
89/05/11 23:34:00 9870
iNTELLIGENCE-PUB THOMAS LAKE APT
CR89D0008987
89/05/29 03:49:00 9860
SUSPICIOUS ACTIV 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
0890DOD9396
89/06/03 13:16:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST 1520 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
0!8900009550
89/06/05 16:31:00 T2159
THEFT -5251.9250 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
C289D0009814
89/06/09 17:33:00 9990
ANIMAL ORDINANCE THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CRO900011521
89/07/02 03:34:00 9801
DOMESTICS 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRO900011938
89/07/07 11:40:00 72159
THEFT -52514250 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR89DO012218
89/07/11 00:22:00 9860
SUSPICIOUS ACTIV 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CR8900012320
89/07/12 16:46:00 9601
DOMESTICS 1520 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
08900012849
89/07/19 14:45:00 9453
ACCIDENT -PD -NIT 1520 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
018900013325
89/07/26 00:24:00 9870
IXTELLIGENCE-PUB THOMAS LAKE PT
CRO900013623
89/07/29 12:56:00 9720
MEDICALS 1510 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CR8900014121
89/08/05 08:59:00 P3119
PROP DAMAGE -MS- 1520 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CR0900014146
89/08/05 16:08:DD 9801
DOMESTICS 1520THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CR8900014663
89/CR112 10:22:00 9310
FOUND 1510 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8900014673
89/08/12 13:05:00 9934
ASSIST OTHER DEP 1510 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
08900014857
89/08/15 14:47:00 A9505
TERROR-TNRT IXF 1520 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8900015261
89/0912D 19:32:00 P3310
TRESPASS -MS -PRI 1510 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8900015539
89/08/23 20:28:00 U3496
THEFT-MS-BICYCL THOMAS LAKE APT
CR8900015883
89/06/27 21:42:00 9801
DOMESTICS 1530 TNOMAS LAKE PT
CRO900015894
89/08/28 01:11:00 9800
MISCELLANEOUS 1510 THOMAS LAKE PT
CRO900015953
89/08/28 19:37:00 9720
MEDICALS 1520 TNOMAS LAKE PT
CR8900016B20
89/09/08 22:40:00 9000
ROAD AND DRIVING THOUS LAKE PT
CR8900017117
89/09/13 10:02:00 9105
HANDICAPPED PARK TNOMAS LAKE APTS
018900017314
89/09/16 02:11:00 X3070
DISTURB PEACE -14 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR89DODIS175
89/09/28 19:30:00 987D
INTELLIGENCE -PUB THOMAS LAKE PT
CR0900018232
89/09/29 17:26:00 %00
FIRE 1530 THOMAS LAKE PT
08900018333
89/09/30 23:04:00 A5554
ASLT 5-TNRT SM 1520 THOMAS LAKE PT RD
CR89DO019781
89/10/08 05:59:00 9800
MISCELLANEOUS THOMAS LAKE PT APT
:28900019972
89/10/26 02:29:00 A1155
ASLT 1-GREA7 00 1520 THOMAS LAKE PT
08900020327
85/10/31 01:01:00 P3310
TRESPASS -MS -PRI 1520 THOMAS LAKE PT
08900020360
89/10/31 13:53:D0 9934
ASSIST OTHER DEP 1520 THOMAS LAKE 9T
CR8900020614
89/11/03 22:06:00 9700
SUICIDE -ATTEMPT/ 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8900021391
89/11/15 22:35:00 A5352
ASLT 5 -INFLICTS 1540 THOMAS LAKE PT
PAGE 2
1990, 1:15 PM PAGE 3
CASE•NBR TIME -RECEIVED CALL -CODE CALL-CODE-DESCR CALL -LOCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t 1021429
89/11/16 12:42:b0 $444
ACCIDENT-PROPERT
1520
THOMAS
LAKE PT
CRoYM021478
89/11/17 00:08:00 4801
DOMESTICS
1520
TNOMAS
LAKE PT
08900021945
89/11/24 20:43:60 9000
ROAD AND DRIVING
1530
THOMAS
LAKE PT
CRMD022337
89/12/01 23:19: DO 9934
ASSIST OTHER DEP
1530
THOMAS
LAKE PT
RD
CRBM022767
89/12/09 14:30:00 9453
ACCIDENT -PD -MIT
1540
THOMAS
LAKE PT
RD
CR8900022821
89/12/10 04:47:00 4818
ALARMS
1520
THOMAS
LAKE PT
CR8900022995
8;/12/13 14:19:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1540
THOMAS
LAKE PT
CR89DO023319
89/12/18 09:20:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1530
THOMAS
LAKE PT
CR8900023345
09/12/18 17:59:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1520
THOMAS
LACE PT
tR890D023365
(39112/18 22:41:00 9700
SUICIDE -ATTEMPT/
1540
THOMAS
LAKE P1
CR8900023492
89/12121 02:46:00 4801
DOMESTICS
1540
THOMAS
LAKE PT
CR8900023645
8+7/12122 22:52:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1530
THOMAS
LAKE PT
CR9000000181
90/01/04 09:46: DC P3119
PROP DAMAGE -MS-
1500
THOMAS
LAKE PT
WDOD000455
90/01/08 15:06:00 U3026
THEFT -MS -ISSUE
1510
THOMAS
LAKE PT
RD
CR9D00001854
90/01/29 08:25:00 9800
MISCELLANEOUS
1530
THOMAS
LAKE PT
RD
CR9DD0001943
90/01/31 D9:56:D0 1(3190
DISTURB PEACE -M
1540
THOMAS
LAKE PT
CR9000002249
90/02/04 20:36:00 9720
MEDICALS
1540
THOMAS
LAKE PT
RD
CR9000002752
90/02/12 19:27:00 9000
ROAD AND DRIVING
THOMAS LAKE
RD i THOMAS LAKE PT
CR9000002804
90/02/13 19:01:00 9000
ROAD AND DRIVING
THOMAS LAKE
RD A TNOMAJ LAKE PT
CR9000002906
9C/02/15 15:06:D0 9801
DOMESTICS
1540
THOMAS
LAKE PT
CR9000002;39
9^/02/16 06:37:00 9800
MISCELLANEOUS
1520
THOMAS
LAKE PT
RD
C29000003907
90/03/03 11:33:00 9444
ACCIDENT-PROPERT
1540
THOMAS
LAKE PT
CR90DOOD4163
90/03/07 18:01:00 9500
MISCELLANEOUS
1510
THOMAS
LAKE PT
CR9000004440
90/03/11 15:52:00 T2159
TNEFT-9251-9250
1520
THOMAS
LAKE PT
RD
WD00005785
90/04/14 23:00:27 N
MUSIC
1510
THOMAS
LAKE PT
5205
131- fT ek
. _L
111111
BURNSVILLE*EAGAN* SAVAGE
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 9 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERY1cEs CENTER
April 17, 1990
Michael Gould
Koldt Properties
Suite 1311
3663 Park Ctr. Blvd.
St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416
Dear Mr. Gould,
APR 231990
We have reviewed your proposal to construct 444 residential housing
units on a site near Metcalf Junior High. We estimate .25 students
per unit for a total of 111 students. This number can be accommodated
within Independent School District 191 facilities and will not place a
strain on school buildings in the immediate vicinity.
The plans submitted earlier suggest that this development will be
served primarily by culdesacs. Please keep in mind that students
would be required to walk to a bus stop located on a through street as
it is our policy not to enter culdesacs with school buses. We would
also call your attention to the need for traffic lights for students
attending Metcalf Junior High. We are concerned about traffic con-
jestion on Diffley Road resulting from increased traffic flow and the
creation of a major intersection immediately across from the entrance
to Metcalf Junior High. Commercial development along Diffley Road
would exacerbate the traffic problem and might also create an
uncontrollable urge for students to congregate at the stores at par-
ticular times during the day. The safety of students crossing Diffley
Road needs to be addressed,
Thank you for your cooperation.
erely,
er s Ackermarfil "
Acting Superintendent
GA/ak
cc: Tom Hedges, City of Eagan
Rudy DeLuca, Principal
�� �Q
t00 RII-ER RIDGE COURT • !L +NESOTA 55777 . (617)197.7100
An En,plo v,
t MEMORANDUM
AdEr
A�
M ARC #TM%n r ftAh%Tff 35:S ►SCS a*nv Lon 7, A" hNl1NY = 55110 612 low -2=
D kTE: A.FFM 17, 1990
10: DALE iilWW, Dnmcm or CL9li'imm
CITY OF EAGAN
?7*m: WE VMS, TRANSPORTATION IM
We have reviewed the conoopt plan dated February 2, 1990 as presented to us by
iKcldt Properties, Inc.. Our review hes Included:
- Trips serrated by the proposed development versus
trips anticipated using the Compreh ralve Land Use Plan
- Potential omrational impacts to Diffley Road
- Ac^ess and internal circulation
Our findings are that the proposed development should have little impact on
Diffley Road operations. Also it appears that traffic to/from the aite should
be able to be aodated by the existing roadway design and traffic controls.
TRIP MERATION
The proposed development le located near Wigan's western city boundary.
7be site is bounded by Diffley Road on the south, Old Trunk Highway 13 on
the vest and Cedar Avenue (TH-77) on the east. The Comprehensive Land Use
Plan designates this site as GD -PD or a general business plarmed
development. Currently there exists a number of developments in the
imrediate vicinity of the site:
- West: SWwAserica at Diffley load / ZH-13
- South: Metc&lf Junior High School
- Northwest: A single iaaily residewe and a ■ini-storage facility
- North: Enron Gas CompaM pipeline pup howings
T`vre is also an existing cable television station iocated *within the
proposed development site on the northwest.
The Eagan Transportation Plan used the comprehensive G8 land use
designation (office mid retail) and estieated that approximately 8,600
average daily trips would occur by Tear 2010. The current proposal is
estimated to produce roughly the same traffic, however the peak hour
.E` directional distribution would be heavier ire -bound in the eveninzdue to
reHaar,►-,�, ►�� the res 14entiall land U&%
L27
DIFFLBY ROAD OPERATICHS AMLySIS
Diffley Road is a fow lane may divided by a eedian which provides
left turn lanes at the eastern prvpvsed accees. The median ends near the
westerly access and a Wnteid antDrsxd left tirn lane is provided.
Diffley Road OM ently marries slightly 9*re than 5,000 vehicles on an
average del' (AUT) at this location. Traffic has been growing at about 3
percent. Per rear over the last 10 Tam which is similar to the average
graph for other in the state. The Trawpoxtation plan projects
that in 20 rears the volume will be appraocisatrlr 9, 900 APT.
An Wa.lysis of the aperatiorr during the peak hours 20 Tears herce has
found that the rmd4way st*uld fu-Ctlon quite well under its current design
and with the airrent stop # ign controls on the s i degtreets . Bare delay
will be incurred by traffic demirint to turn onto Diffler head, mer
the delays are emoted to be relatively abort.
AO= AND DrfM?iAL CIRCULATION
Acoecs to Diffley Road aMCS to function well provided that the location
Of the easterly aoc"s is refined to line up properly with the Junior High
School entrance. 'There are a mater of internal Circulation concerns
x`iich will have to be resolved during the project review ;wooers. Our
prixarY ow) erns cater on the funetion of the ria h -south reeideMtial
street which oorrects with the only aoves9 to the retail development. The
north -youth residential street carries through traffic through the retail
parking area. The two oambined traffic uses may negatively impact one
another as well as cause a pedestrian safety problem. We also have some
other geceetric and parking aoncerrg which Can be resolved during later
sore in depth r*vlews.
1 2
U TOTAL P.04
RENTS & VACANCY RATES
FOR RENTAL HOUSING IN
EAGAN
CITY OF EAGF►N
ro=ects Constructed 1985 to rese,- :
0 BR —1 ER Z_m 3$
Vacancy Rate 14.298 3.428 5.03% .618
Average Monthly Rent $402.50 $543.46 $638.90 $695.95
arc ,ects
ConstrLcted
Between 1980
and E5:
0 ER
I BR
Vacancv
nate
21.99%
08
08
;vera ce
11c..— .h -2 y Rent
$500.60
$572.00
$675
Prc=ec`s
Ccns` .:ctec
Prior to 2980:
0 E
a BIZ
2 BR
3
Vacancy
Race
08
4.23%
3.88%
2.60%
;vera a
Mcnl-ly Rent
$386.43
$538.19
$520.93
$619.16
SOURCE: DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING
& REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MARK S. ULFERS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
/ Sq
a
JKZLULNZL) n—g kmULTIFLL) ACRES
SINCE 1987
OVERALL TOTALS
R-2 to R-1
12.90
acres
R-2 to PF
6.00
acres
P-3 to R-1
47.13
acres
P-3 to LI
14.64
acres
R-3 to Commercial
57.00
acres
R-3 to R-2 and R-1
1.47
acres
R-4 to R-1
57.50
acres
R-4 to R-3
31.22
acres
R-4 to PF
76.22
acres
R-4 to LI
16.27
acres
R-4 to L3
10.00
acres
R-4 tc C-nnerc-al
9.00
acres
R-4 tc CSC
2.08
acres
F-4 and R-1 to
40.00
acres
Con-erc1 al
R-4, PF, and R-3
39.30
acres
to R-1 and R-2
TOTAL 410.83 ACRES
,1989 REZONINGS
Rasmussen College
Rezoning of 8.5 acres from R-4 to LB.
Campus
Located in HE 1/4 Section 16, W of I -35E,
abutting Federal Drive to the west.
City of Eagan
Comp. Guide Plan Amendment/Rezoning of 1.5
acres of R-4 PD to LB PD.
Located N of Diffley along W side of
Lexington Avenue in Lexington South PD,
SW 1/4 Section 23.
City of Eagan
Comp. Guide Plan Amendment/Rezoning of
10.9 acres from R-2 to R-1 in Lexington
South PD.
Located along the N side of Wilderness Run
Road, and E of Walnut Hill Park in the S
1/2 Section 26.
City of Eagan
Corp. Guide Plan Amendment/Rezoning of 7.4
acres from R-3 to R-1 in Lexington South
PD.
Located S of Diffley, E of Lexington in
the NE 1/4 Section 26.
City of Eagan Comp. Guide Plan Amendment/Rezoning of 60
acres from -R-4 to PF in Lexington South
PD.
Located at SW corner of Diffley and
Lexington in NW 1/4 Section 26 and NE 1/4
Section 27.
Eagan Evangelical Comp. Guide Plan Amendment/Rezoning of
Covenant Church 4.84 acres in Lexington South PD from
R-4 to PF.
Located in SW 1/4 Section 23 between
Lexington Way and Lexington Avenue.
Kings Wood 4tb Rezoning of 1.73 acres of R-3 PD to R-1.
Located in HE 1/4 Section 21.
West Publishing Rezoning and PD Amendment of 16.27 acres
Company from R-4 to LI, and 14.64 acres from R-3
to LI.
Located in SE 1/4 Section 13.
r
1988 REZONINGS
Community of Joy Rezoning of 6 acres from R-4 to PF.
Church Addition Located in SW 1/4 Section 23.
Blackhawk Pond Rezoning of 36.6 acres from R-4 to R-1.
Located in N 1/2 Section 21.
Thomas Lake Woods Rezoning of 39.3 acres from R-4 and PF and
R-3 to R-1 and R-2.
Located in SW 1/4 Section 28.
Lexington Land Company Rezoning of 57 acres from R-3 to
Commercial PD.
Located in SE 1/4 Section 10.
Alden Pond Rezoning of 31.22 acres from R-4 to R-3.
Located in W 1/2 Section 9.
Carl R. Olson/ Rezoning of 9 acres from R-4 to
Lance Company Commercial.
Located in SW 1/4 Section 10 East of I -
35E.
Saints Martha and Mary Rezoning of 5.38 acres from R-4 PD to PF.
Episcopal Church Located at NE intersection of Lexington
and Diffley.
Cray Research, Inc. Rezoning of 40 acres from R-4 and R-1 to
Commercial PD.
Located in S 1/2 Section 1.
.--w �R '�V-'
,I;-
1987 R ZO WINGS
Winkler Development Rezoning of 2 acres from R-2 to R-1.
Company Located in NW 1/4 Section 31 Winkler -
Jackson PD, Oak Cliff Addition, Block 1.
Tri -Land Properties Rezoning of 28 acres from R-3 PD to R-1.
Lexington Parkview Addition, SW 1/4
Section 1.
Leroy
Rotber and
Rezoning
of
2.08 acres from R-4 to CBC.
Gerald
Braun
Located
in
SE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 15 N of
(R & B
Addition)
Crestridge
Land and S of Duckwood Drive.
Praise
Lutheran
Rezoning
of
6 acres from R-2 to PF.
Church
Addition
Located
in
Lexington South PD.
St. Francis
Wood 6th
Rezoning
of
20.9 acres from R-4 to R-1.
Located
in
SE 1/4 Section 15.
Berry
Ridge Addition
Rezoning
of
1.47 acres from R-3 to R-2 and
R-1.
Located
in
the SW 1/4 Section 22.
1989 TOTALS:
�~
R-2 to R-1
10.90
acres
B-3 to R-1
9.13
acres
R-3 to LI
14.64
acres
R-4 to PF
64.84
acres
-4 to LI
16.27
acres
R-4 to LB
10.00
acres
TOTAL
12S.78
A CRE S
1988 TOTALS:
F-3 to Connercial
57.00
acres
R-4 to R-1
36.60
acres
R-4 to R-3
31.22
acres
R-4 to PF
11.38
acres
R-4 and R-1
40.00
acres
to Comrercial
R-4 to Connerc'al
9.00
acres
R-4, PF, and R-3
to R-1 and R-2
39.30
acres
TOTAL
224.50
ACRES
1987 TOTALS:
R-2 to R-1
2.00
acres
R-2 to.PF
6.00
acres
R-3 to R-1
28.00
acres
R-3 to -P-2 and R-1
1.47
acres
R-4 to R-1
20.90
acres
R-4 to CSC
2.08 acres
TOTAL
60.45
ACRES
E J
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JANUARY 23, 1990
DIFFLEY CEDAR FLAWED DMLOPktZ T/T.OLDT PROPERTIES
Chairman Graves opened the public hearing regarding a rezoning to
amend the Splashland Planned Development to allow a Mixed Use
Multi -Family Residential and Retail Development, and a Comprehensive
Guide Plan amendment for specification of development within an
existing Commercial Planned Development designation of approximately
41 acres located in the northwest corner of the intersection of
Highway 77 and Diffley Road in the southwest quarter of Section 19.
City Planner Jim Sturm reviewed the proposal for the Commission.
Mike Gould (Koldt Properties, Inc.) introduced members of the
team. He pointed out the following regarding the request:
1. Isolation from lower density property;
2. Access to major highways;
3. Excellent views;
4. Reference to the Maxfield letter;
5. Excellent for Mixed Use development.
Peter Pfister (architect) reviewed previous projects of Pfister
Architects of Minneapolis. He reviewed the Eagan sites and explained
the benefits and draw backs. He stated the views are excellent and
that Enron would provide landscaping and screening on its site. He
outlined the utility availability and reviewed the proposed site
plan.
Mike Falk gave an overview of the leasing of retail.
Chairman Graves explained that the City was looking to down -zone
R-4 uses. He stated the proposal looked very nice. Commissionmember
Miller questioned the current zoning. City Planner Jim Sturm pointed
out the current zoning was Planned Development. Commissionmember
Miller asked if the use was appropriate for the zoning. He also asked
what would happen when the Planned Development lapsed. Community
Development Director Dale Runkle stated that the City must terminate
Planned Developments. City Attorney hike Dougherty explained the
process.
(�s
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JANUARY 23, 1990
Commissionmember Gorman commented that the developers did their
homework as the proposal was a quality product. He felt uncomfortable
accepting more R-4 and strip malls. Commissionmember Miller stated he
felt the proposal was a nice affair but that the citizens had stated
they did not want more R-4 development. Commissionmember Merkley
echoed their concerns. He stated he was against more high density
housing. He appreciated the project, but felt there was enough R-4
zoned land in Eagan. Commissionmember Miller asked if the strip mall
were eliminated, if the plan would be better received by the
Commission. Commissionmember Voracek felt the Commercial needed to
eliminated or the density reduced. He felt R-2 zoning would be
acceptable. He pointed out the problem with the Cable TV location.
Peter Pfister pointed out that the area on the ridge was zoned
Industrial. He explained the cable location options.
Commissionmember Trygg remarked that the plan was nice but that
it would be creating more apartments. Chairman Graves asked what the
City would do with the parcel. He pointed out that if General
Business use was proposed, the City's hands may be tied. He commented
that the project looks very nice but that it was not the best use for
the property.
Cor=issionmember Voracek questioned the feasibility of an R-1
development. Chairman Graves referenced the Burnsville development.
Mike Gould explained that from a
proposed planning standpoint, the
use would be the best use. He felt down -zoning was an
economic issue. He stated that economics were not there for
townhouses. He explained that housing can stand on its own merits and
that the retail use could be reexamined.
Commissionmember Miller suggested a continuance. Chairman Graves
questioned if the developer would agree to a continuance or if it
requested the matter go before the Council. Mr. Gould stated he would
like time to reexamine the matter.
Chairman Graves suggested further review regarding the relocation
Of the cable company, elimination of the R-4 zoning and removal of
the retail center. He felt the design was nice. Commissionmemberr
Voracek requested better graphics of the chimney. He pointed out that
vacancy in Eagan was high.
Miller moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and continue the rezoning and a Comprehensive Guide Plan
amendment for the Diffley Cedar Planned Development as requested by
Roldt Properties to a future Advisory Planning Commission meeting.
All voted in favor.
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 1990
DIFFLEY CEDAR PLATED Dr7XLOPH /XOLDT PROPERTIES
Chairman Graves convened the next public bearing regarding a
rezoning to amend the Splashland Planned Development to allow a mixed
use multi -family residential and retail development and a
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment for specification of development
within an existing Commercial Planned Development designation of
approximately 41 acres located in the northwest corner of the
intersection of Highway 77 and Diffley Road in the southwest quarter
of Section 19.
City Planner Jim Sturm explained, the application to the
Commission and detailed the changes.
Mike Gould (Koldt Properties, Inc.) further explained the changes
to the Commission.
Peter Pfister (architect) reviewed and compared the previous
proposal to the new proposal. He displayed diagrams and slides of
similar developments. He also diagramed the zoning changes in the
City. Mr. Gould further described the slides and explained that
retail and residential would work well together.
Chairman Graves stated that most of the issues had been addressed
and felt that Koldt Properties were responsive to the concerns of the
City. He felt it was a nice plan and that the density had been
reduced.
Coirnissionmember Merkley questioned if the apartments could be
eliminated. Mr. Gould pointed out that the cost would be prohibitive
and that having all townhomes was not feasible. Commissionmember
Merkley further had questions regarding the status of the cable
company, site line interference and the use of the strip portion. Mr.
Gould responded to his concerns and pointed out that the use of the
strip portion would be community uses - neighborhood center.
Cor"missionmember Staehli asked for the phasing timeframe. Mr.
Gould stated the timeframe was three years. Commissionmember Hoeft
asked if there would be drainage into the pond. Mr. Pfister stated
there would be partial draining into the pond. Assistant City
Engineer Mike Foertsch explained the proposed drainage.
Commissionmember Hoeft questioned if there would be other recreation
facilities. Mr. Pfister explained that the matter needed to be
explored in further detail.
Commissionmember Gorman had questions regarding the Planned
Development and the total capacity. Mr. Pfister pointed out that the
total capacity would be 750 people. Commissionmember Trygg asked who
would manage the site. rr. Gould explained that Koldt Properties
would be on-site managers.
(9 �
FEBRUARY 22, 1990
Commissionmember Merkley felt the change was a better plan but
still would prefer the elimination of the apartments. Chairman Graves
pointed out that the view would be nice but that he too had concerns
with the apartments. Commissionmember Staehli asked if any similar
projects had already been built by Koldt Properties. Mr. Pfister
explained two similar projects. Commissionmember Trygg felt there was
a good mix and location. Commissionmember Gorman felt the building
features needed to be pinned down further. Mr. Gould described the
building materials and the rental rates. Chairman Graves questioned
the range of the Planned Development. City Attorney Mike Dougherty
explained Planned Developments.
Chairman Graves requested an additional condition allowing only
two -three story 66 unit apartments. Commissionmember Staehli
requested an addition of a condition stating no gas pumps would be
allowed. Commissionmember Merkley recommended Koldt Properties
contact the cable company and obtain its agreement with the plan and
the relocation of its building.
Merkley moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment from a
Commercial Planned Development designation to a Mixed Residential and
Retail Planned Development, of approximately 41 acres located in the
northwest corner of the intersection of Highway 77 and Diffley Road
in the southwest quarter of Section 19, as requested by Koldt
Properties. All voted in favor.
Merkley moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to approve the rezoning
to amend the Splashland Planned Development to allow a Mixed Use
Multi-Far.:ily Residential and Retail Development known as Diffley
Cedar Planned Development, as requested by the Koldt Properties,
subject to the following conditions:
1. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a
five year period.
2. A phasing plan shall be submitted with the Preliminary Plat of
the 1st Addition.
3. An overall landscape plan shall be prepared.
4. An overall sign agreement shall be entered into.
5. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened.
6. An overall design theme shall be carried out in the
residential area, to include materials referenced in the staff
report.
�k�
FAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 1990
7. All commercial areas shall be constructed with the same
materials with all sides of the buildings being constructed of the
same material.
S. All trash/recycling areas shall be contained within the
buildings.
9. All applicable environmental permits shall be obtained.
10. The development is subject to additional requirements as
Identified by City staff during the platting phases of development
necessary to provide adequate public infrastructure facilities to
service the development.
11. Only two -three story 66 unit apartments will be allowed.
12. No gasoline pumps shall be allowed.
All voted in favor.
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MARCH 27, 1990
DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLMMD DE9TLOPX2 T - ROLDT PROPERTIES
Chairman Graves opened the first public hearing for the evening
regarding a rezoning to amend the Splashland PD (Planned Development)
to allow Mixed Use Multi -Family Residential and Retail Development
and a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for specification of
development within an existing CPD (Commercial Planned Development)
designation of approximately 41 acres located in the northwest corner
of the intersection of Highway 77 and Diffley Road in the southwest
quarter of Section 19.
City Planner Jim Sturm summarized the application for the
Commission and presented the background information. He noted that
the City Council had referred the item back to the Planning
Commission, and recapped the five general concerns made known by the
Council at their March 6 meeting. City Planner Jim Sturm indicated
the plan had not changed from the previously approved plan but that a
staging plan has been developed and the landscape architect had been
retained. He further stated that Enron will meet with the City to
discuss this landscaping.
Mike Gould (Koldt Properties) stated that they will meet with
Short -Elliott -Hendrickson to study the Diffley traffic affect. SEH
will then prepare a letter on the affect. Mr. Gould further stated
that the developer will be meeting with the School Superintendent to
determine the school impact. He also stated that the project has been
cut back as much as possible.
Peter Pfister (Architect for the project) described the phasing
of the project. He stated that the development would start on the
southern end of the property and develop northwards. He estimated
approximately two years to complete the project. He presented details
on the row house buildings and described the hard cover on the
project as being approximately 35%.
Fred Dukatz, 1915 East Blue Stone, asked if handicapped access
would be available. The architect responded that it would.
Chairman Graves stated that he was surprised when this item came
back and he needed more information on why it was referred back. City
Planner Sturm referred to the resolution of the Council and reviewed
the five points raised. Commissionmember Trygg stated she did not
understand condition 3 in that this was a Planned Development and not
an R-4 zoning. Mr. Pfister stated that there was a lot of green space
on the project. City Planner Sturm stated that the staging plan may
eliminate some of the concern of item 3.
Chairman Graves asked how many acres of retail would be involved
in the project. The developer stated approximately 6.7 acres.
Chairman Graves further questioned the unit density. Commissionmember
Merkley stated that he felt that the Council was not comfortable with
the density of the project and that they wanted a different use. He
felt that the Advisory Planning Commission should not act on the same
project.
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MARCH 27, 1990
Commissionmember Gorman stated that the Council thought that the
A�visory Planning Commission was not in tune with the City's
direction on this project and that they wanted a more creative and
innovative alternative project. Commissionmember Voracek stated that
the Council concerns had not been addressed and felt that the only
options were to continue for more information or deny.
Commissionmember Miller stated that this was the same proposal
that the Advisory Planning Commission gave unanimous approval to the
unnth before and wondered what had changed. Chairman Graves recapped
the history of the proposal and stated that the Council minutes and
conditions did not give sufficient direction to the Planning
Commission. Commissionmember ,Miller agreed and stated that nothing
had changed since the last review by the Planning Commission. He
further stated that had he been present at the last month's meeting,
he would have objected to the Cable and Enron parcels in the
development.
Mr. Gould stated that the developer planned to approach the cable
site relocation through the Cable Commission but that Enron could be
buffered and would not require acquisition. He stated that three of
the five Council points would be addressed in the next week or so and
that the School had not raised the issue of increased enrollment. He
further stated that he did not have all the answers tonight. Chairman
Graves asked if retail was necessary for the project. Mr. Gould
stated that it was. Chairman Graves then asked if the retail could be
delayed and have the residential put in first. Mr. Gould stated that
half of the residential would be built in the first phase and then
retail. Chairman Graves stated that the developer should examine this
option. Cornissionmember Hoeft stated that the Council felt there
were too many units in this project; that the project did not change
and therefore the discussion of the matter may be moot.
There was more discussion regarding the Council rationale for
referring it back to the Planning Commission. Chairman Graves stated
that a continuance was not appropriate on this item. Commissionmember
Merkley stated that he felt that it was a quality development but
that the Council wanted something different.
City Attorney Mike Dougherty explained that the applicant had
requested the return to the Planning Commission rather than have the
Council vote on the item on March 6. Chairman Graves stated that the
minutes from the Council should be more informative on items such as
these. Commissionmember Merkley agreed. Chairman Graves stated that
the return of two members who were not present last month and the
developer's future meetings would provide more information for the
Council. Commissionmember Voracek stated he was against the proposal
as did Comnissionmember Miller.
Miller moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to reaffirm the February
Advisory Planning Commission vote to approve the Diffley/Cedar
Planned Development proposal. Trygg and Graves voted for; Miller,
Voracek, Hoeft, Merkley and Gorman voted against. The motion failed.
")(0t
OC153
Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 1, 19W
Councilmember Pawlenty asked why two additional parcels were requesting review when presumably the
Council was reviewing Area M because the property owner had not received proper notice. Director of Community
Development Runkle said that staff had been working with the property owners and were close to agreement with
what the City wants and what the owners want to bring in. He said they would like to find something that all could
Ove with. Councilmember Pawlenty asked if this would set a precedent. Mr. Runkle said of the 16 properties, these
are the only three that there are major concerns with.
Councilmember McCrea said she originally voted against removing Area M from the rest of the parcels being
considered for rezoning because ft would set a precedent and now two additional properties have come forward.
Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, a motion to continue further consideration of Area M under review as
a part of the R-4 Rezoning Study to a workshop allowing a formal presentation by the property owner. Aye: 4 Nay:
1 (McCrea)
REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT
DfFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
The City Administrator provided a chronology on this item. He said the project first appeared on the Advisory
Planning Commission agenda in January of 1990 and again in February when it was recommended for approval.
The City Council heard the item for the first time in March and then referred ft back to the Planning Commission with
specific direction. At the March 27 APC meeting, a motion to reaffirm the February approval failed. However, the
City Administrator added that whether this could be construed as a denial was open to interpretation. He then
turned the discussion of the background of this item over to the Director of Community Development.
Director of Community Development Runkle pointed out that the applicant had reduced the density of the
original application. He said the plan that had been originally presented to the APC at their January meeting had
been reduced for reconsideration in February by 17%. It was this reduced density plan that was recommended
for approval. After hearing the proposal at the March 6, 199, City Council meeting, the City Council referred the
project back to the Planning Commission meeting for additional review. Mr. Runkle said the motion at that meeting
did not affirm the original motion. Mr. Runkle also said the Planning Commission had reevaluated the issues and
concerns regarding public safety, schools, zoning, appropriateness of use and now it was a land use decision. Mr.
Runkle said the applicant was there to answer any questions.
Mayor Egan said he was a little disappointed in the product coming back from the APC. He said he thought
the Council had expressed their concerns to the Planning Commission and had wanted those concerns addressed.
He said he did not see anything in the APC action that indicated they had addressed the issue of whether this
product was the project the City wanted for this site. He then asked the applicant if the project had been changed.
Mike Gould of Koldt Properties said that it had not.
Councilmember Gustafson asked ff the R-4 (apartments) had been removed from the project and the Director
of Community Development said no, there were two, 140 unit apartment buildings in the project. Councilmember
McCrea said that the proposal had nal changed from that brought before the Council in March.
The Mayor told the applicant that the City is studying R-4 and R-3 zoning in the City and is looking for a net
downzoning of those properties. He said the Council was receiving the same project as before and it would be up
to the developer to convince the Council that they should look at the property differently than they had on March
6.
Mike Gould then attempted to clarify the developer's position on the project. He said they had reduced the
density previously but had to balance economies with what was marketable and with what would serve the people
Page 101EAGAN CRY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 1, 1994
00154
of Eagan. He said because of the quality and uniqueness of the site, the market they wanted to reach was at that
$600-$950 rent range, or at the upper end of the rent market. He said the product would appeal to the higher
income renter, many of whom would be buying in the area and rent 1-2 years before buying. He said the quality
of the project would appeal to the senior population and they have 98% occupancy in their other senior
developments. He said they had paid special attention to the amenities of the project such as, landscaping, an
irrigation system, maintenance free (metal) exteriors, wader amenities, a 5,000 s.f. clubhouse, adhietic facilities for
children, and trailways. Mr. Gould said they are also working with Enron to improve the site fines.
Mr. Gould then addressed some of the aftemate uses that had been suggested by the Council for this
property. He said he had talked to an associate with the Radisson Hotel chain and was told the hotel market is
extremely soft right now. Mr. Gould also said the office space market had a 25% - 35% vacancy rate. He added
that K on the off chance a hotel development or corporate headquarters development were to come in, they would
have to be very sizeable for a 40 acre site. He said quality was the substitute here and they would like to do the
project.
Mr. Peter Pfister then spoke to the Council regarding their concerns about the density of the project. He said
that a typical project with 16 units per acre would translate into 50% hard cover; however, because this project
has three story apartments and underground parking, they are looking at 35% hard cover. He also pointed out that
the parcels involved with this development carry three different zonings: light industrial, agricultural, and general
business. He said one of the benefits of the project would be to remove some of the industrial zoned land. They
would also landscape and shield the Enron property, He said there is a lot of open space at Enron, and with the
new development and landscaping, the Enron buildings would tend to subside from view. He said that their
development would focus on the 'new town' concept integrating diverse housing types with recreation and retail on
site. The concept envisioned for the Diffley/Cedar site is modeled architecturally after an English village with steep
roofs, chimneys, row houses and gardens.
Councilmember McCrea questioned whether the slides indicated what would actually be built or whether they
were just ideas. Mr. Pfister said the slides showed conceptual drawings. The Councilmember also asked how many
people were proposed to live in the development. Mr. Pfister said from 650 - 700. Councilmember McCrea was
also concerned about the number of persons per household. Director of Community Development Runkle said that
the number of persons per household in Eagan is approximately 3-4 persons in single-family and 1.5 persons in
multiple. The numbers for students per household is approximately 1.25 for single-family and less than .5 for
multifamily.
Councilmember McCrea then asked with those numbers, how the development would support the daycare
and retail centers. Mr. Gould said they would also serve other residents. The Councilmember said that was not
a 'new town' concept. Mr. Gould said the development was not on a scale to be self-supporting.
Councilmember Gustafson said an office or hotel use for this parcel may not be realistic. He said he
personally did not consider a mixed residential use inappropriate for this site, particularly since the market and
quality are there. He said he had looked at other developments the developer has in the Twin Cities and is assured
of the quality. Councilmember Gustafson said that with all things considered, they may be hard-pressed to find
anything better.
Mary Teske, a resident of Cinnamon Ridge, said that a hotel or the previously proposed Splashland did not
excite the neighborhood and they were not anxious to have any more commercial. She said it is a residential area
and she did not understand the zoning. She expressed concerns about an LPG line that ran through the property
and recommended that it be checked to see If it had been abandoned. Prior to approval, however, she requested
that the Council address traffic and drainage problems. Because of its location, she was concerned that properties
below it would experience flooding.
X 03
00155
Page 11/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 1, 1990
Tom Webster, the owner of three of the parcels, said they had dealt with the drainage issue when Splashland
was proposed. He said even with the parking lot, the drainage was no problem. He also pointed out that there
were a number of different parcels on the ridge and a number of different zonings. He said he would like to see
someone development the entire area as one project rather than a piecemeal approach. He also said he has had
a number of persons approach him to buy individual parcels for a gas station or a plumbing supply company, but
has tried to wait for one big development.
Councilmember Pawlenty said he had struggled with the quality and quantity issue. He said the developer
was aware that they would have to have a quality project but the Courdimember was concerned about the details
of the project. He said he liked the drawings but was hesitant until the details were bolted down with a definite
commitmenL He said as he k)oked at other ahematives for the site, the proposed project may be the lesser of two
evils.
The City Administrator said the Council had identified an important point and suggested that the Council direct
City staff to meet with the developer to generate a development agreement. He said this would allow them to satisfy
their concems before making a commitment to the project.
Councilmember McCrea asked the Director of Community Development If there were any possiblity the
Metropolitan Council would not approve the project. Mr. Runkle said that in addition to the comprehensive guide
plan, it would have a lesser impact as residential and would frt the environmental standards. He said he did not
foresee any problem.
Councilmember Wachter asked if the Council should take for granted that this was the best use of the
property. He said it did not live up to his expectations. Councilmember Gustafson said the project was better than
that allowed under the present zoning. With the present zoning, however, he said it would be difficult to tum down
a developer who met the requirements and wanted to put in a gas station.
The City Administrator asked if the Council had any desire to direct Community Development to kook at other
land use options. Councilmember Pawlenty said he was interested in other options' however, for the present
proposal, he needed to be convinced that the quality of the exteriors was exceptional. Mayor Egan recommended
a two-way dialogue between the staff and City Council during the next 30 days.
Gustafson moved, McCrea seconded, a motion to direct staff to work with Koldt Properties in the formulation
of a development agreement to be brought back to the City Council for their consideration at the June 5, 1990,
regular City Council meeting.
Councilmember McCrea wanted her second to the motion tempered with the understanding that she reserves
the right not to follow through with approval for the project if the exterior quality of the development's buildings are
not suitable or site sensitive or concems about traffic circulation are not satisfactorily addressed.
Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Pawlenty) Councilmember Pawlenty said he was in favor of the spirit of the project but
warned to explore other options.
SPECIAL PERMIT,POLICE RREARMS RANGE
CRY OF APPLE VALLEY
The City Administrator said that the City of Apple Valley had approached the City several month ago regarding
development of a Police shooting range or firing range and asked if the City of Eagan had any interest in
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
AhW- MENTACTI'Y CODE CHAPTER 1QgESIDENTIAL OFF-'TRESI' PARIGNG
A. Amendment, City Code Chapter �,0, Section 10.51, Residential Off -Street Parking—
Enclosed on pages (� through you will find a proposed City Code amendment
incorporating changes and additions to City Code Section 10.51 concerning "Junk Cars,
Furniture, Household Furnishings and Appliances Stored on Public or Private Property."
The intent of the amendment would be to define specific areas within which motor
vehicles, motorized vehicles, boats or trailers can be parked within residential districts and
requiring proper screening if such storage is outside of a building.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amendment to City
Code Section 10.51 as presented.
�c�S
Subject: Residential Off -Street Parking
Purpose: (1) To protect and. conserve the value of real property
throughout the City.
(2) To protect the character and social and economic
stability of all areas of the City.
?mendeJ Section: 10.51
Chanties and Additions.
1. Change: "any unlicensed, unregistered or inoperable motor
vehicle" to:
2. After "unless housed within a lawfully erected building"
add.
"as
UA?_, i
3. Add subdivision 1: uz SLreem parxing OP. 1.1T,Y Urciicu iaaiu
The boulevard portion or unpaved island portion of a street shall
not be used for parking except when leased or otherwise conveyed
by the City to the adjoining property owner.
4. Add subdivision 2• Driveway setbacks. All driveways require a
minimum side yard setback of five (5) feet.
5, paid subdivision 3• Modification of Code. Any of the above
requirements may be waived or modified with special approval from
tt:e City Council after notice and opportunity to be heard is
given to all abutting or surrounding property owners.
6. Definitions
a. Motor vehicle motorized vehicle brut or trailer.
D_'d I.eludes but is not limited to: car, truck:, _.tor.cycle, go-cart,
all -terrain vehicle, water bike, r:'3t, including.
motorized and non -motorized, and any trailer typically used in
connection with any of the above or as a general utility trailer.
b. Properly Screened:
All the screening required by this section shall consist
of either a fence or green belt planting strip as provided below:
(1) A required screening fence shall be constructed of
masonry, brick, wood, or metal. Such fence shall provide a solid
visual screening effect six (6) feet in height. The design and
materials used in constructing a required fence shall be subject
to the approval of the City Council. Fences in excess of six (6)
feet in height shall require prior approval of the Zoning
Administrator.
(2) A green belt planting strip shall consist of
evergreen trees and/or deciduous trees and plants and shall be of
sufficient width and density to provide an effective visual
screening effect to a minimum height of six (6) feet. Earth
mounding or berms may be used, but shall not be used to achieve
more than three (3) feet of the required screen. The planting
plan and type of plantings shall be subject to the approval of
the City Council.
c. Boulevard. The portion of the street right-of-way between
the curb line and the property lire.
,
251
�
SEC. 10.58. ABANDONING A MOTOR �m�%��� I� is
vehicle unlawful for any person to abandon a mo�or v�h^ on any
public o,
private property without the consent of t=
in control such nePerso»
'
-of property. For the Purpose of this acc-
tion, a ~motor vehicle" is as defined
in Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 169, and an "abandoned motor vehicle" z� as defined
in City Code, Section 2,70_
SEC. 10.51. JUNK CARS, FURNITURE,HOUSEHOLD
FURNISHINGS AND APPLIANCES STORED ON PUBLIC OR PRIVATE
PROPERTY. It is unlawful
to park or at ore wn
unregistered or inoperable motor vehicle,Y uolicensed,
inge household �orn1sh-
or appliances or parts or co
" components thereof, on any
property, public or
privateunless housed within a lawfully
erected building. Any violation
o -f this Section is declared
to be a nuisance and upon seven days written notice to e
c�
owner, as shown by the records in the office of the County
Auditor, of private
premises on which such material zo
found, the City may
remove the same and certify the coot of
such removal as any other special aaoessment.
SEC. 10.52. PROHIBITED USE AND PARKING OF MOBILE HOMES
AND RECREATIONAL
CAMPING VEHICLES.
Gobd. Iop�in�ouo. The terms "mobile home"
and "recreational camping
vehicle" shall and includetbe following definitions.mnan
�
A. "Travel Trailer" - & vebicular, portable
structure built on a chassis, designed to be '
used as
temporary dwelling for travel, recreational m
vacation
uses, permanently identified "Travel Tro'ian�"
manufacturer of the trailer, �er �y the
B' "pick-up Coach" - A structure designed to
b� mounted
o `n chassis for use as a temporary
dweIli f a truck
ng for travel, recreation
and vacation.
Home" - & Portable, temporary
dwelling to be used for
o zor travel,
^
recreation and vaoation
constructed as an integral part of a self-propelled '
vehicle.
D. "Camping Trailer" - A folding mtroctor e~
mounted on wheels and designed for
`
travel,recreation
vacation uses. aou
Subd. 2. Unlawful Acts.
A. It is unlawful for any person to park a
mobile home o reore��ionalcampinq
1i
A
vehicle upon public or
private Property
^ z ^"^ """on habitation
except in m licensed
251
�
Agenda Information Memo
CP
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
RESOLUTIONICOLLABORATIVE AIRPORT PLANNING
B. Resolution, Collaborative Airport Planning—Enclosed on pagesg2ZO througha �--
you will find a resolution expressing support for collaborative community airport planning
with the Metropolitan Airports Commission. The concept of such a practice was discussed
by Mayor Egan and mayors of the cities of Richfield, Bloomington and Mendota Heights
at a recent meeting hosted by the city of Richfield. The purpose of the resolution is to
encourage the Metropolitan Airports Commission to engage in a collaborative and
interactive planning process with noise affected communities to be certain that
improvements both at the airport and within the communities consider airport operations
and existing development patterns.
The resolution has been approved by the city of Richfield and is pending before the cities
of Minneapolis, St. Paul, Bloomington and Mendota Heights. Staff has expressed concern
to the city of Richfield that the resolution in its original form did not include a role for
the Metropolitan Council which, of course, is responsible for coordination between local
planning efforts and the metropolitan systems of which the airport is one. With respect
to that, staff has inserted a reference to the Metropolitan Council within the resolution
and suggesting their participation in this process. This has been discussed with
Metropolitan Council representatives and staff and they are in concurrence with the
proposed role suggested in the resolution.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the resolution
expressing support for collaborative community airport planning as presented.
RESOLUTION
EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR COLLABORATIVE
COMMUNITY AIRPORT PLANNING PROCESS
Eagan, Minnesota
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has established a dual
track process to address airport adequacy at Minneapolis St. Paul
airport (MSP); and
WHEREAS, the Legislature through adoption of 1989
Metropolitan Airport Planning, Chapter 279 has endorsed the 'dual
track planning process as a balanced approach to continued aviation
growth; and
WHEREAS, Track A of the dual track process provides for
capacity enhancements at MSP; and
WHEREAS, MSP causes adverse environmental impacts upon
a number of cities including Minneapolis, St. Paul, Bloomington,
Richfield, Mendota Heights and Eagan; and
WHEREAS, these adverse environmental impacts may be
expected to increase with capacity enhancement plans; and
WHEREAS, MAC is currently developing a plan to provide
for expansion at MSP; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate for MAC to determine how the
current airport or future expansions of the airport impact the
surrounding communities and how these impacts could be mitigated;
and
WHEREAS, Track B of the dual track strategy calls for the
siting and recommendation on construction of a new major airport
replacement, in case one is needed; and
WHEREAS, another new airport, if one is ever constructed,
is decades away at the earliest; and
WHEREAS, current airport operations negatively impact
communities surrounding the airport; and
WHEREAS, deferring efforts to mitigate MSP's noise
impacts on residents of surrounding communities based on the
possibility another airport will eventually be constructed decades
from now is unsound public policy; and
WHEREAS, identification of mitigative measures including,
but not limited to, sound insulation, sound abatement,
redevelopment and clearance are appropriate planning measures which
should be included in the MAC ten year capital improvement plan;
and
C;? 0
WHEREAS, cities adjacent to MSP may either facilitate or
impede appropriate airport improvements by such activities as
development, redevelopment, construction of capital improvements
and regulation of land use; and
WHEREAS, such activities by adjacent communities may also
be frustrated by decisions made by MAC about MSP improvements; and
WHEREAS, it is therefore not in the best interest of the
public to undertake planning for airport improvements or
identification of adverse impacts and means of mitigating them
without participation by the communities most effected;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Eagan, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the Metropolitan Airport Commission initiate
a collaborative community airport planning process;
and
2. That the planning process include the cities of
Minneapolis, St. Paul, Richfield, Bloomington,
Mendota Heights and Eagan and the Metropolitan
Council; and
3. That the purpose of the collaborative interactive
planning process be to identify airport adverse
environmental impacts on communities surrounding the
airport and identify measures to mitigate these
adverse impacts; and
4. That this information be considered as part of the
MAC capital improvement planning process and
documents; and
5. That this process be initiated as soon as possible;
and
6. That the information gathered as part of the inter-
active planning process be forwarded together with
the MAC capital improvement plan to the legislature;
and
7. That the state legislative deadline for receipt of
the MAC capital improvement plan be extended to at
least June 30, 1991, in order to provide sufficient
time to complete this process.
art
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Eagan, Minnesota, this day of , 1990.
Motion Made By:
Seconded By:
Those In Favor:
Those Opposed:
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
Bv:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution
was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof
assembled this day of , 1990.
E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
City of Eagan
iia
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
LICENS OFF -SALE MALT LIQUORJSERVICE STATION
CIG UCKWOOD 66,33575 PILOT KNOB ROAD
C. License, Off -Sale Non-Intmdcating Malt Liquor License, Duckwood 66 Service Station,
Service Station License, and Cigarette License, Located at 3575 Pilot Knob Road—The City
has received application from Phillips 66 doing business as Duckwood 66 at 3575 Pilot
Knob Road for the above referenced licenses. The applications are in order and all fees
have been paid. The Police Department is in the process of reviewing the application and
they will make their recommendation when the investigation is completed. This
recommendation will be included as an agenda item for a future packet.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the application
by Duckwood 66 for an off -sale non-into)dcating malt liquor license, service station permit
and liquor license for the property at 3575 Pilot Knob Road.
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
RESOLLMONJEMPORARY NOTE
D. Resolution Providing for the Issuance of a Temporary Note—The City has incurred
certain costs in association with tax increment financing development district #2 in
northeast Eagan. These costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax increment proceeds
and the City anticipates receipt of the first of these proceeds in 1991.
At the present time, the following costs have been identified as pending in relation to this
project:
Short Elliott Hendrickson $369139.09
Springsted $26,462.76
Faegre and Benson 119,896.15
TOTAL $82,498.00
In order to pay these current obligations prior to receipt of the tax increment proceeds,
the tax resolution would provide for the issuance of a temporary note to cothese costs
at a rate of 8 1/2%. A copy of the resolution is enclosed on pages 2 / S through,-1Lf
for your review. A copy of the temporary note is enclosed on pages through.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the resolution
authorizing issuance of a temporary note to provide funding for development district #2
and the purchase of the temporary notes from available funds.
Authorizing Issuance of Temporary
Notes to Provide Funding for
Development District No. 2 and the Purchase of
the Temporary Notes from Available Funds
Resolved by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Minnesota,
as follows:
1. Background and Findings. Pursuant to a
Resolution adopted January 17, 1989, this Council approved the
Development Program for Development District No. 2 and the Tax
Increment Financing Plan for a related Tax Increment Financing
District. The Tax Increment Financing Plan contemplates the
issuance of tax increment bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.178. The City has incurred certain costs in
connection with Development District No. 2 which require
financing. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, Subd. 5,
temporary tax increment notes may be purchased on their initial
issuance from funds which the City Council determines will not
be required for other purposes before the maturity date of the
notes.
2. Temporary Note. To provide funds presently
needed for the initial costs of Development District No. 2, the
City shall issue its Temporary Tax Increment Note as described
below and shall purchase such Note from available funds on
deposit, all as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.178, Subd. 5. The Note shall be in the principal amount of
$82,498, shall mature on August 1, 1991, shall be subject to
prior redemption at the option of the City on any date at par
plus accrued interest, shall bear interest at the rate of 8.50%
per annum, payable at maturity, and shall be dated as of the
date of delivery. As authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.178, Subd. 5, clause (b), the Note shall be purchased upon
its initial issuance at par from funds currently on deposit in
the City's Investment Trust Fund. It is hereby found and
determined that the foregoing fund to be used for the purchase
of the Note includes sufficient amounts which are not required
for other purposes prior to the maturity of the Note. The Note
shall be issued in anticipation of tax increment and permanent
bonds which the City is authorized to issue for Development
District No. 2 under the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the
Tax Increment Financing District related thereto, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178. The Note shall be in such
form and shall contain such other provisions as the officers
executing the same shall approve, which approval shall be
conclusively evidenced by the execution thereof. The Note
shall be executed by the the Mayor and the signature of the
City Clerk and sealed with the seal of the City. The City
shall expend the proceeds of the Note on current Development
District No. 2 costs in the manner required by law and the Tax
Increment Financing Plan. The Note shall be paid from the
proceeds of permanent tax increment bonds which the City shall
issue and sell pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Subdivisions 2,
3 or 4, prior to the maturity of the Note, except to the extent
available tax increment is sufficient for the payment thereof.
3772e
-2-
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
CITY OF EAGAN
No. R-1 $82,498
TEMPORARY TAX INCREMENT NOTE (DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 2)
Maturitv Date of Original Issue
August 1, 1991 July 17, 1990
The City of Eagan, in the County of Dakota and State
of Minnesota, for value received, hereby certifies that it is
indebted and hereby promises to pay to the City of Eagan, or
registered assigns, but solely from the sources described
below, the principal sum of Eighty-two Thousand Four Hundred
Ninety-eight dollars ($82,498), together with interest thereon
at the rate of 8.50% per annum, both principal and interest
payable on the maturity date specified above, upon the
presentation and surrender hereof, at the office of the Eagan
City Treasurer as Registrar and Paying Agent, or at the offices
of such successor agents as the City may designate upon 60
days' notice to the registered owners at their registered
addresses.
This Note is subject to redemption at the option of
the City, in whole or in part, on any date at par plus accrued
interest. Thirty days' notice of prior redemption will be
given by mail to the registered owner, and published notice of
prior redemption will be given in the manner provided by
Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes.
This Note is issued for the purpose of providing funds
for the payment of certain expenses for Development District
No. 2 of the City as set forth and described in the Resolution
of the City Council relating to the issuance hereof adopted
June 17, 1990 (the "Note Resolution"), and in strict conformity
with the provisions of Section 469.178, Subd. 5, Minnesota
Statutes.
This Note and interest hereon is payable solely from
tax increment received with respect to Tag Increment Financing
District heretofore established in Development District No. 2
of the City and from the proceeds of long term bonds which the
City shall issue and sell pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.178, subdivisions 2, 3 or 4, prior to the maturity
hereof. To the extent that the principal of and interest on
this Note cannot be paid from tax increment pledged, or other
funds appropriated for the purpose, it shall be paid from the
proceeds of long-term bonds or additional temporary bonds that
the City shall sell or cause to be sold pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.178, subdivision 2, 3 or 4. Subject to
the limitations of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178,
Subd. 5, and in addition to other available remedies if 'this
Note is not paid in full at maturity the holder hereof may
demand that the City issue replacement temporary Notes in
accordance with such subdivision. Tag increment pledged to
this Note may be subordinated to the pledge of such tax
increment to any other obligations of the City to the extent
provided by the City Council.
This Note is transferable, as provided in the Note
Resolution, only upon books of the City kept at the offices of
the Note Registrar by the registered owner hereof in person or
by his duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Note
for transfer at the office of the Note Registrar, duly endorsed
by, or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in form
satisfactory to the Note Registrar duly executed by, the
registered owner hereof or his duly authorized attorney, and,
upon payment of any tax, fee or other governmental charge
required to be paid with respect to such transfer, a new fully
registered Note of the series of the same principal amount will
be issued to the designated transferee or transferees.
It is Hereby Certified, Recited and Declared that the
Tax Increment Financing District has been duly created after
public hearings, all as required by law; that all acts,
conditions and things required to exist, happen and be
performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Note do
exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due
time, form and manner as required by law; and that this Note,
and the series of which it is a part, is within every debt and
other limit prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the
State of Minnesota.
In Witness Whereof, the said City of Eagan, acting by
and through its City Council, has caused this Note to be
executed with the signatures of its Mayor and City Clerk, and
the corporate seal of said City to be affixed hereto, all as of
the Date of Original Issue specified above.
Dated: July 17, 1990
(Seal)
CITY OF EAGAN
By
Mayor
And by:
City Clerk
ASSIGNMENT
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells,
assigns and transfers unto _
(Please Print or Typewrite Name and Address of Transferee) the
within Note and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably
constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer
the within Note on the books kept for registration thereof,
with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated:
Please Insert Social Notice: The signature to this
Security Number or Other assignment must correspond with
Identifying Number of the name as it appears on the face
Assignee of this Note in every particular,
without alteration or any change
whatever.
3773e
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
SPECIAL USE PERh=OODLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.+''f'ORTABLE CLASSROOMS
E. Special Use Permit, Woodland Elementary School, to Allow Continuation of Portable
Classrooms at Woodland Elementary School—An application has been received of
Woodland Elementary School (Independent School District 196) located at 945 Wescott
Road requesting a special use permit to allow the use of two portable classrooms at the
school site. This special permit was previously approved on August 15, 1989 for the
1989/1990 school year only.
Enclosed on pages--k-_�' l through,.022.>-for your review is the Community Development
Department staff report regarding this item.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special use
permit for Woodland Elementary School to permit the continued use for two portable
classrooms at the school site as presented.
M'01
SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: WOODLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
LOCATION: 945 WESCOTT ROAD
EXISTING ZONING: PF (PUBLIC FACHXnES)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 17, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 12, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Woodland Elementary
School requesting a Special Use Permit for the continued use of two portable classrooms.
COMMENTS: The original Special Use Permit was approved at the August 15, 1989 City
Council meeting. The permit allowed two portable classrooms located in the northwest
portion of the building. The reason for the request was due to overcrowding in the
school. The third condition for approval was that the permit be valid through the 1989/90
school year only. Further use would require reapplication, and so this application has
been filed.
If approved, the Special Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. The portable classrooms shall be handicapped accessible, if necessary.
2. All City building permit requirements and building code standards shall be met.
3. The permit is valid through the 1990/91 school year only. Reapplication will be
required if the applicant wishes to extend this permit.
OR
,L
s
I
F avow 110053m
c�
t
a
� 1
JAIMQ 5N/�S•e3
�o
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
VARIANCESIAL HERRMANN CONSTRUCTION
F. Variances, Al Herrmann Construction, 20' Setback Variances on Lot 1, Block 2,
Fairway Hills Addition Along Cliff Road, Lot 1, Block 5, Fairway Hills 2nd Addition, and
Lot 4, Block 1, of Proposed Fairway Hills 4th Addition Along Pilot Knob Road in the NW
1/4 of Section 34—Staff is in receipt of an application from AI Herrmann Construction for
LLr—
' tback varianc for three lots in the Fairway Hills Additions. Enclosed on pages
through�� for your review is the Community Development Department staff
report regarding these parcels. The reasons stated for the variance request in each case
is the affects on the lots as a consequence of the Pilot Knob Road/Cliff Road construction
project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS TI'EM: To approve or deny applications for
a 20' variance to the 50' setback from major thoroughfares for the following: 1) Lot 1,
Block 2, Fairway Hills Addition, 2) Lot 1, Block 5, Fairway Hills 2nd Addition, and 3) Lot
4, Block 1, proposed Fairway Hills 4th Addition.
2�
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: AL HERRMANN CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, FAIRWAY HILLS
LOT 1, BLOCK 5, FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND
LOT 4, BLOCK 1, PROPOSED FAIRWAY HILLS 4TH
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 17, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: JULY 9, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: The plat for the Fairway Hills project was approved in ".play
of 1987. This concept consisted of phased development. Since the time of City Council
approval, Dakota County has increased the right-of-way along Cliff Road from 100' to
125'. Also, the County improvement of Pilot Knob Road resulted in an alignment shift
to the east.
COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a 20' Variance to the 50' setback required
from major thoroughfares (Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road). The setback Variance for
each lot is to be a side yard setback. The additional right-of-way acquired along Cliff
Road has resulted in Lot 1, Block 2, Fairway Hills Addition, becoming a non -buildable lot.
Lot 1, Block 5, Fairway Hills 2nd Addition and the proposed Lot 4, Block 1, Fairway Hills
4th Addition both were negatively impacted by the approximately 24' shift of Pilot Knob
Road when it was improved.
If approved, this Variance shall be subject to the following:
1. All other setbacks shall be met.
2. All applicable Ordinances are adhered to.
LLJ
cn
Cc
Z)
0
L)
LL
-j
0
0
CL
Mel
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT INIl-Y LONE OAK CHURCH ADDITION
G. Rezoning, Trinity Lone Oak Church Addition, of Appra dmately 9.95 Ag (Agricultural),
R-4 (Multiple) and GB (General Business) Acres to a PF (Public Facilities) District and
a Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot and a Cemetery Located on the East Side of
State Highway 149 North of Lone Oak Road in the SW Quarter of Section 1 and the SE
Quarter of Section 2—The Advisory Planning Commission at its regular meeting of June
26, 1990 considered applications from Trinity Lone Oak Church for a rezoning of 9.95
acres from GB and R-4 to PF (public facility) and a preliminary plat for one lot for the
property located at 2950 Dodd Road. Trinity Lone Oak is currently considering expansion
of their existing facilities which will bring the property to its final development stage.
Because the City Code prohibits expansions of a non -conforming use, these applications
were submitted.
For additional information regarding this application, please refer to the Community
Development Department report which is enclosed on pages .2�througl%,2� for your
review. As a part of the plat application, a 14' variance from he 20' setback for the
parking/drive area is required. Also enclosed on page througkQ _L/rare the
minutes of the Advisory Planning Commission meeting. The Commission is recommending
approval.
In association with this application, the sanitary sewer, water and storm water trunk
financial obligation in the amount of $11,813 have been identified. A cash contribution
of $7,916 for the City's water quality management plan has been identified and a cash
contribution for park land dedication is also recommended.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning of
approximately 9.95 acres of Ag (Agricultural), R-4 (Multiple) and GB (general business)
to a PF (public facilities) district and a preliminary plat consisting of one lot and a
cemetery as presented.
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING
APPLICANT: TRINITY LONE OAK LUTHERAN CHURCH
LOCATION: 2950 DODD ROAD (SE 1/4 SECTION 2)
EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) & R4 (MULTIPLE
RESIDENTIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 26, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 18, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a
Preliminary Plat and a Rezoning of approximately 9.95 acres of land currently zoned GB
and R-4 to PF (Public Facility) of the 9.95 acres gross area, 4.32 acres represent the
cemetery. In addition to these applications, the church is also preparing to expand their
facility.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently the church site contains a cemetery, the church
built in 1904, the old school building built in 1954, and the Trinity Lone Oak Lutheran
School built in 1972. The school serves grades K-2. The site has City water, but not
sewer.
CONENIENTS: When the City was made aware of the expansion plans for this site, the
owner was informed of the need for platting and rezoning the property. Because this
expansion will result in the final development phase of this property, platting is necessary.
Because the City Code does not allow the expansion of a non -conforming use, the
Rezoning of the property will clean up the conflicting zoning situation. The PF zoning will
coincide with the Land Use Guide Plan designation of Public Facility for this area.
The expansion will include the removal of the old school building which is currently being
utilized as office space. The expansion will be built off the rear or east side of the
existing church and will include additional church seating space that will double the seating
capacity to approx. 400 persons, meeting rooms, day care area and a basketball court
which will double as a multi-purpose room. The basement of the addition will connect
with the school and accommodate offices, a kitchen area, storage, and a washroom.
�a�
Based on seating capacity, the City Code requires 114 on-site parking spaces. The plans
submitted provide 120 parking spaces. All building and parking setbacks also meet Code
requirements, except for the parking setback along the southern boundary. This
parking/drive area has a setback of approximately 6' from the adjacent Agricultural zoned
land. Because a 20' setback is required where a PF district abuts Agricultural or
Residential land, a Variance of 14' is necessary to allow this parking area along the south
property line.
The facade of the addition will be brick, except for the basketball/multi-purpose building
which will have painted, textured concrete walls, and a pitched roof that will tie in with
the existing church.
Other improvements to the site will include City sewer and paved parking for vehicles.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROh: This plat provides for the
regrading of a portion of a site that is partially developed.
Approximately 70% of the 10 acre plat is a combination of cemetery,
ponding area, or land that will not be developed as part of this
plat. The proposed grading will result in minimal disturbance of
vegetation since the area of the grading is over existing gravel
surfaced parking and driving areas.
The grading will not result in any significant change to the
existing drainage patterns and storm sewer will be provided for
surface water drainage from the proposed parking areas and
buildings. Surface water drainage will be directed either east to
Pond FP -7 or southwest to the easterly ditch along TH 149/55. Pond
FP -7 is a designated ponding area in the City's Comprehensive Storm
Water Management Plan.
WATER QUALITY: Storm water drainage from the developed portion of
the site and from the areas that will not be further developed will
ultimately flow into either Pond FP -7 or GP -11. These ponds are
classified as a nutrient trap (FP -7) and a storm water basin
(GP -11) under the Water Quality Management Plan. Based on the land
use and runoff characteristics from the site, a total of 0.6 acre-
feet of wet storage volume should be provided for these drainage
areas. Since Pond FP -7 is a nutrient trap and partially within the
plat, staff recommends that a cash contribution to the water
quality fund be required for this plat.
UTILITIES: Existing sanitary sewer for the plat consists of a
septic tank and drain field. As part of the plat, sanitary sewer
is proposed to be extended from an existing sanitary sewer main
along the north edge of the plat to the area of the existing and
proposed buildings. As proposed, the extension would be through
the middle of the property, be privately owned, and not be extended
to the south property line. Since sanitary sewer for properties
south of this plat must be provided from the same sanitary main
along the north edge of this plat, staff recommends that the
sanitary sewer be extended to the south property line and the sewer
be a public line.
Existing'buildings within the plat are served by an 8" water main
along TH 149/55 that is of adequate size and pressure to serve the
proposed addition to the site. Fire hydrants located northwest of
the existing church building and along the north side of the
existing buildings provide the existing fire protection.
Additional hydrants are not included in the preliminary plans, but
staff recommends that water main be extended and an additional
hydrant be added along the edge of the proposed parking lot SE of
the existing school building to provide adequate fire protection.
2 2�j
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Existing street access is provided by
an entrance off of TH 149/55 and is not proposed to be changed.
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: An easement for sanitary sewer
will be required for the sewer extended to the south property line
in addition to the easement required for Pond FP -7.
A drainage permit and a utility permit will be required from MnDOT
for construction of storm sewer at the entrance from TH 55/149.
The development will be responsible for ensuring that all
regulatory agency permits are obtained prior to final plat
approval.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - TRINITY LONE OAK LUTHERAN:
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the
past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges
are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing
fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's
utility system based on the submitted plans.
Improvement
Sanitary Sewer Trunk
Water Trunk
MWater Availability
Charge
Storm Water Trunk
Upgrade
Proi
Use
Rate
Qtv
12
P.F.
$1,435/A
1 Acre
49
P.F.
$1,450/A
1.45 A
538
P.F.
$2,285/A
1.45 A
302
P.F.
.027/SF
183,823 SF
Amount
$1,435
2,102
3,313
4,963
(')Parcel #10-00200-030-75 assessed 3.36 A acres of WAC in 1972.
If levied here no WAC should be collected as part of the building
permit.
� 30
TRINITY LONE OAK LUTHERAN CHURCH CONDITIONS
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on
September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B2, B4, C1, C2, Dl, E1, and F1
2. A setback Variance of 14' for the parking area along the south property line.
3. All trash and recycling materials shall be contained within the building or the
enclosure shall be attached to the building and constructed of the same materials
as the building.
4. No rooftop mechanical equipment shall be visible from the streets.
5. A drainage and utility permit will be required from MnDOT for
the storm water drainage which is directed towards the State
Highway Right -of -Way.
6. The development is required to extend sanitary sewer to the
southerly adjacent property.
7. Additional hydrant coverage is required along the parking lot
area southeasterly of the existing school building.
8. A cash contribution of $7,916 is identified as the
development's requirement in accordance with the criteria
identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan.
A.
B.
C.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage,
ponding, and utility easements as required by the
alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required
public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public
right-of-way as necessary to service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development
of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not release
until one year after the date of installation.
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised:
PLATAPPR.CON
LTS #1
6/12/89
�3�
` IDkbs✓�6L �vsittl�/
I I f'WAe *10erVA
.. 784.!9
I
�Ir
CEMETERY a
r
7 •
�s
to
I
30!37•••
147.13 .W �°a,,� N89'24'4� "6
t}
o PRELIMINARY PLAT:
n
3 TRINITY LONE OAK CHURCH ADD.
h
5E Cod✓EYt Sc%f 5W &A N&V srv%
SGC. 2-T1?W-d?3 ; SEI. /-Tl7N-�Ii�✓
4C✓
i
DELMAR H. SCHWANZ
l Noe Ro,.q•o" -Cft w. U— 1 , Mw y. N --
1`4710 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA $IOM alb4MI M
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I Mvb, enlll, IMI Ih't Iun•, rl.n el ne0.l w.1`
pr•I'.r•d b, n,• eJr tend•, ,.., dn•Ci fubMl.,On .nd
IAN I t- 1 dul, I{.p ll•r•0 l•ne Swlvoiel YrlOtr
Mo low& of the SIN• of Ml.no.ele
Doted "f -/6 -1`o
Mrnn•.ela R•pnlnlien No 6675
i
timer -Developer:
Trinity Lone Oak Lutheran Church
2950 Dodd Road (hwys 149 and 55)
Began, MN 55121
Tel. 454-7235
Contact Person:
Mr. Leonard Perron
450-5691 (day)
Present Zoning:
Areal
Gross Area - 9.95 acres
Legal Description:
ice attached sheet.
Utilities)
Present buildings are served by
City rater system.
New construction will be served
by City sanitary sewer to the
north at a hook up in the plat
of Blue Ridge Second Addition.
Project Scope:
Construction of a new building which
will resodel the present sanctuary
enlarge the sanctuary, and connect
on to the present school buildings.
Architect:
Morrison/Nalijarvi Architects
Contact person! Michelle Maier
^ 5/
Tel1..426426-3287
pRELIM11VARY PLAT:
TRINITY LONE OAK LUTHERAN CHURCH 40,01TION
LON
DgLUAR M..SCHWANZ
Mr a -W
1 IPI
ol
4d
;7,j
Ir
��� `�. 1;�\�.\
V
L �ij(j lr„ Ij"
tr
110 -r
7'7
PROPOSI'O 04AINA647
\ 1 \ ,'L- - "I 1 I - I� 4
10'
V HW4
4(
�2`
f
85P.0 I
\ \ �' L \'�' S CID
cr)
41
"NA
ci
V
In
CID
r (p
�/'� i X11,,1\\ \,'+`'� *\ _... ��•: ^:,.,I '' .. � •ra-� • I� -��\ 1; ` e•�`\4`\��—
IL
P, *o9.14 447 p -
I CID%
'q
�7—
it
a
bt
OF -
0,
_4
A FF.—V
X, -
t. r—?7,
a
s
'* Ir
v f
x ,il 3 Y
L
�
p
b L ^y
Z �
e
r: ft
F
z
N
�K
T
n
O P
x
r
*�
rp.
s•
T
k
610
x * �•
t ry.al�
\
'v
r
r
•
J
;
K
�
La
s
~ 1 — •1
T
•�
kq
X
-51 Y
f
°•r •1 Iit SS v1053111-Nvo,a
lD[C Dcr IiiDl ^r� . Di A.- OW
m l5s rao5a+l+w'iDri .nae 31N1v. I t. m w" •. �n r. H'Jfl�y-10 Ny'0 fN6- A.Ilfo +
133u15 MIWWAinli „p 1°nlr.':n M�• �' i
•�1: 1 :tl0! VNI�300N ib,D NOIlI��v
es cn sr 'ONI `S1O311HOEIV IAtivrnvM/NOSl8UOW
Lr y,
Ii i
M1LU
;T7.
`\•\\I.,'�*I ♦ ,, W j�` � +I. 1 1 �� tl i y i t i 'I 1 r ! y 's= = i -Y+-- --T'f
;'•� I, °• j:. wl � � ,o- •' i � yl i � F i l; l t �� l r 11 1 1 �II
iia 1 i t! •=i 1 �I
�� i• I_ I J r
F F I(j I I'
1.
Ey I;v I Ir
Pt • �` i i � r �- f I II � �.,
Z I,F
I Q In lid
�Dr Ilc I; i�L11J.. I I_e 1E j cr
W 5� 7 50,
` - ewe IA.DNl"�— — �� r 1
SdM
ej
Z w
I �
zYzo-iz. 1219, r'7^A �� " zzzsS V1D63NN111 'Nr OVA m
41,55 r1053NNn '3rrl b<3d ZZ SS �Mw GSSi T
117b.5 wsb.lu, n.1z 1! i..w'ii,l� n��r::is`.� �• ,:`i r FCJklfY'i'J Htl0 3ti0-' i.11Md1 � ,
'ONI'S1O311HOliV IAuv nvM/NOSIU80W L.4 -J, e i : ;YOJ DNI130004Y N011,00Y
Q
+ � :r;A : �, i : ' S •.i 617 %� ._ .� _ .� ..� -i .,, J
I
of . � f I u ►--�—., j-._ 1.,...... ,
I"I u I o sl
� � �h" i ,_—_r- i� • I �, .III I I ,,I II � �) II �.�. �i J�
\`' •I I Vii" I y .; •SS
�• !'? U I
I' I
FT
X71
I
1 1
I !
OILa
i__j.-�
-1
rl "R
Howm Wo 3w
LO
1A1dvrnvM/NoS1w80W
LLiLIJ
:woj ON113CON3W q Nowoov
C -d
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION
SANITARY SEWER TRUNK
04(
G/
A/it 14. 'a 'ir I 0~ ab"Po! Alerw'4w*.r
CEM�j E
Ln
xik%:x
V,
jVOP*20r 'MAW
jj
PRE:LIMJN,
Sulo
TRINITYA
w-'cld z
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION
WATER TRUNK
WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE
ex -
.e
/3/ vii:.
9
-q�.rso �rnv+y
TRINITYONEK_ \�'i �Aa
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION
STORM SEWER TRUNK UPGRADE
2 43
Page 7/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNI14?a?::C£iMM'38"IDN';MINUTES
June 26, 1990
TRINITY Lo ADDITION
AiDDITION
Chairman Voracek then presehted"the next item for consideration
regarding a rezoning of approximately 9.95 Agricultural, Multiple and
General Business acres to a Public Facilities district and a
preliminary plat consisting of one lot and a cemetery located on the
east side of State Highway::::::::�49:;:;::-4:9th:::::::of Lone Oak Road in the
southwest quarter of Section :izi::ti::sutiteast quarter of Section 2.
City Planner Jim Sturm presented the staff report to the Planning
Commission.
Francis Trost, the buildfor the Church, said he was
available for questions.
Eldon Warson, the architect for the project, showed the plans to
the Advisory Planning Commission and reviewed them with the
Commission. He stated that the storm drainage cost was an issue.
Chairman Voracek asked staff'**''t0-:;.address the storm drainage cost issue
with the applicant priortd uncil presentation. He asked that
this be a condition. City Eiiginiieerr:::::::,Mike Foertsch stated that
condition 8 should delete the:::: dollar,..:.;.amount and that staff would
review this amount prior to Counc'il. r!q**:i tion.
Member Merkley had quest aris""' concerning the siding. Mr. Warson
explained that it would b& -stone faced concrete block painted to
match the Church. Member Merkley then asked if condition C4 was
needed as a condition. City Planner Sturm stated that conditions C4
and G1 should be added to condition 1.
Trygg moved, Hoeft secorilai4 :
Page 8/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING:::.COMM
ISSION :1�#fiNUTES
June 26, 1990 •••
2. A setback variance the parking area along the
south property line.
3. All trash and recyling materials shall be contained within the
building or the enclosure .,sha1=.1..... ba....attached to the building and
constructed of the same mater: 4 .#*:::A:9: -..U� ?U�.lding.
4. No rooftop mechanical egspment:;::::::shall be visible from the
streets.
5. A drainage and utility permit will be required from MnDOT for
the storm water drainage which is directed towards the state highway
right-of-way.
6. The development is:zit t .ed to extend sanitary sewer to the
southerly adjacent property.
7. Additional hydrant cover';iigo:::'.is:':'required along the parking lot
area southeasterly of the exi&.t. ,J::::school building.
8. A cash contribution shall be required of the development as
identified in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's
Water Quality Management Plan.
9. The storm drainage cost :Issue .,.shall be addressed with the
staff prior to Council presentation.::::::::
All voted in favor. . . .
COVENTRY PASS 3RD ADDITION - UNITED MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Chairman Voracek opened the public hearing regarding a
preliminary plat consisting of 50 lt:s on approximately 19.8
previously zoned R-1 (Single Family) acres east of Dodd Road in the
east half of Section 24.
City Planner Jim Sturm provided the:.:application summary to the
Advisory Planning Commission.
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT COVENTRY PASS 3RD ADDITION
UNITED MORTGAGE CORPORATION
H. Preliminary Plat, Coventry Pass 3rd Addition/United Mortgage Corporation, Consisting
on Approximately 19.8 Previously Zoned R-1 (Single Family) Acres East of Dodd Road
in the East Half of Section 24 --At its regular meeting of June 26, 1990 the Advisory
Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider an application for preliminary plat
for Coventry Pass 3rd Addition consisting of 50 single family lots on 19.8 R-1 acres. As
proposed, the project meets and exceeds the R-1 minimum requirements for 12,000 square
foot lots.
For additional information concerning this application,]ease refer t� the ommunity
Development staff report which is enclosed on pages-Zl?throu%; t4I." for your
review. Also enclosed on pages��� through- > 1�f are the Advisory Planning
Commission minutes related to this item. The APC is recommending approval of this
application.
Financial obligations in the amount of $20,700 have been identified for this project.
Park land dedication was previously provided in earlier phases of Coventry Pass. In
addition, a cash trails dedication is being recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary
plat for Coventry Pass 3rd Addition consisting of 50 R-1 lots on approximately 19.8 R-1
acres east of Dodd Road in the east half of Section 24.
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT
COVENTRY PASS 3RD ADDITION
APPLICANT: UNI'T'ED MORTGAGE CORPORATION
LOCATION: E 1/2 OF SECTION 24
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 26, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 19, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary
Plat for the Coventry Pass Third Addition consisting of 50 single family lots on 19.8 of
previously zoned R-1 acres. The site is the eastern half of the originally platted Outlot
at the Coventry Pass Addition that was final platted on October 3, 1989. The proposed
Coventry Pass Third Addition is bordered by the City of Inver Grove Heights to the east,
north of Outlot D, Coventry Pass, Coventry Pass Addition, and Dodd Road is located west
of this site, and south of Wescott Road approximately 388'.
United Mortgage Corporation has been working with the City of Inver Grove Heights and
intends on platting 55 acres in Inver Grove Heights. The project would be served by
Eagan sewer and water.
As proposed, the lots meet the R-1 requirements and vary in size from 12,000 square feet
(Code minimum) to 22,165 square feet. The overall net density for the project is 2.53
lots/acre. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area as D -II (Mixed Residential,
0-6 units/acre.)
a(�7
GRADING DRAINAGE EROSION CONTROL: This plat involves the
replatting of a previously approved plat and grading plan.
Revisions to the previously approved plan are minimal even though
the street circulation has been revised. The preliminary street
grades for the revised layout as shown on the revised grading plan
meet the City's standards.
Storm water drainage from the revised grading plan will flow into
both Ponds JP -56, which is located within Inver Grove Heights, and
JP -54. Both ponds are identified as designated ponding areas in
the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. The outlet
for Pond JP -56 will be provided for under this project.
WATER QUALITY: As indicated above, runoff from the plat will be
directed into either Pond JP -54 or 56 which are both classified as
nutrient traps. Based on the land use and runoff characteristics
from the site, a total of 2.4 acre-feet of wet storage volume
should be provided for the 19.8 acres of this plat. Ponds JP -54
and 56 are classified as nutrient traps and wet storage volume can
be provided within these ponds. The water quality requirements for
the JP -54 drainage area portion of this development were provided
with the Coventry Pass 2nd Addition.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity, and depth
is available from the previously developed portions of this
addition. Although not included in the preliminary plat, staff
recommends that sanitary sewer be extended north along Dodd Road
to an existing manhole on the east side of Dodd approximately 40'
north of the plat. This would allow for the rerouting of sanitary
sewer from the northeast corner of the Hills of Stonebridge
Addition as previously planned under the Hills of Stonebridge
Addition project.
Water main of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is available
to serve this site from an existing lines within the previously
developed addition and from the existing 8" main in Dodd Road.
Connections to these mains are indicated on the preliminary water
main layout.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Revisions to the previously approved
platting for this land provide for an additional access to Dodd
Road and future access to land within Inver Grove Heights.
Temporary cul-de-sacs will be required on the stub streets that
will provide future access to Inver Grove Heights.
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: All required right-of-way and
easements of sufficient width based on depth of utilities for
streets and utilities will be dedicated as part of the plat.
Temporary easements will be required for the temporary cul-de-sacs.
04
The development will be responsible for ensuring that all
regulatory agency permits are obtained prior to final plat
approval.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - COVENTRY PASS THIRD
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the
past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges
are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing
fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's
utility system based on the submitted plans.
Improvement
Proi I use Rate
Sanitary Sewer Trunk 566 SF $690/Lot
QtyAmount
30 Lots $20,700
COVENTRY PASS THIRD ADDITION
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action of
September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C3, C5, D1, EL F1 and G1.
2. No direct roadway access shall be allowed on Dodd Road.
3. The development is required to provide sanitary sewer service
to the existing sanitary sewer (provided with the Hills of
Stonebridge development) which is located on the east side of
Dodd Road approximately 40' north of this development.
4. A cooperative agreement between the City's of Inver Grove
Heights and Eagan is required to ensure that the quantity and
the quality of storm water runoff generated by this
development which flows from Pond JP -56 (located within Inver
Grove Heights) into the City of Eagan storm sewer system is
in accordance with the requirements identified in the City's
Storm Water Management Plan and Water Quality Management Plan.
,:PSO
A.
B.
C.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
Easements and Rights-of-Wa
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage,
ponding, and utility easements as required by the
alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required
public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public
right-of-way as necessary to service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development
of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
Plans and Specifications
1.: All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
SSI
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not release
until one year after the date of installation.
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1.
Approved:
Revised:
All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
council action.
Advisory Planning Commission
Auqust 25, 1987
PLATAPPR. CON
LTS #1
6/12/89
� J�
city council
September 15, 1987
I
rr
ee
1z
62
Jill. FINANCIAL OBLIGA71ON
SANITARY SEWER TRUNK
30 Lots
a��
I
Page 8/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNII4q*::'•COMmiSSION:MINUTES
June 26, 1990 •••
2. A setback variance of :1::::deet ::d'r the parking area along the
south property line.
3. All trash and recyling materials shall be contained within the
building or the enclosure sha.1....be.....attached to the building and
constructed of the same materas:::fii$::#.l ding.
4. No rooftop mechanical eg144ment.::::: shall be visible from the
streets.
5. A drainage and utility permit will be required from MnDOT for
the storm water drainage which is directed towards the state highway
right-of-way.
6. The development is etf.ed to extend sanitary sewer to the
southerly adjacent property.
7. Additional hydrant cove racl ::::3s -required along the parking lot
area southeasterly of theexis:ta; :;:s�h 1 building.
8. A cash contribution shall be required of the development as
identified in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's
Water Quality Management Plan.
9. The storm drainage cost Issue ...shall be addressed with the
staff prior to Council presentation.::::;:::
All voted in favor. ""
COVENTRY PASS 3RD ADDITION - UNITED MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Chairman Voracek opened the put'lic hearing regarding a
preliminary plat consisting of 50 l#.'s on approximately 19.8
previously zoned R-1 (Single Family) acres east of Dodd Road in the
east half of Section 24.
City Planner Jim Sturm provided tha:.:application summary to the
Advisory Planning Commission.
c-;LS7
Page 9/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING.':COMMI
>SSION :.MINUTES
June 26, 1990 .••
Wayne Tauer of Pioneer Eh'1*1ing (applicant) stated he was
available for questions and that he had no problems with the
conditions. Member Merkley asked if a temporary cul-de-sac would be
required as a condition if Inver Grove Heights did not approve the
adjoining development. City p1.nner..stuzxn..Stated it was not needed as
a condition. City Engineer:::::::Fseso:;::::::sated that C3 adequately
addressed the issue. MembeM'eiryMtn asked that condition 2 be
amended to prohibit driveway as::::6pposed:::to roadway, access to Dodd
Road. He further stated that cq dition:::: 4 should be amended to
encompass street, utility and .:gii:l iic .::: fety issues in the joint
powers agreement.
Merkley moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to approve a
preliminary plat consisting of 50 lots on approximately 19.8
previously zoned R-1 (Single Family) acres east of Dodd Road in the
east half of Section 24, subject to the following conditions:
1. These standard cond: t; -Qn:s:.:..., of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15;':�::i-9;8�::::::shall be complied with: Al, B1,
B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C3, C5, D1, Fs1., F1' ::aii3 G1.
2. No direct driveway acces;sall be allowed on Dodd Road.
3. The development is required to provide sanitary sewer service
to the existing sanitary sewer (provided with the Hills of
Stonebridge development) which is located on the east side of Dodd
Road approximately 40 feet north::::qf.::::thi.s:::.development.
4. A cooperative agreement b0,tween :::::::the Cities of Inver Grove
Heights and Eagan is required to insure that all street, utility and
public safety issues are resolved::: between the Cities of Eagan and
Inver Grove Heights. ..••
All voted in favor.
GALABIE CLIFF PLAZA 2ND:::6DDITI0N
GALA%IE CLIFF PLAZA PAitkERBHIP
Chairman voracek hearing
preliminary plat consisting of 7.59 acres....with one lot
for a medical clinic located west of plaza Drive in
quarter of Section 32.
as8
dealing with a
and an outlot
the northwest
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLATIGALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA 2ND ADDITION
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA PARTNERSHIP
I. Preliminary Plat, Galaxie Cliff Plaza 2nd Addition/Galaxie Cliff' Plaza Partnership,
Consisting of 7.59 Acres with One Lot and an Outlot for a Medical Clinic Located West
of Plaza Drive in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32 --The Advisory Planning Commission
held a public hearing at its regular meeting of June 26, 1990 to consider a preliminary plat
application for Galaxie Cliff Plaza 2nd Addition consisting of approximately 7.6 acres
comprising one 2.1 acre lot for a medical clinic and remaining area as an outlot.
For additional information regarding this application, please refer to the Community
Development Department's staff report w ich ' enclosed��ages��bthrough l -
for your review. Also enclosed on page throughv,�CL are the Advisory Planning
Commission minutes with respect to this application. The Commission is recommending
approval of this application.
Financial obligations for water availability and trunk storm sewer in the amount of $9,828
have been identified for this project. A cash dedication of $42,369 has been identified for
the City's Water Quality Management Plan.
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a cash trails and
parkland dedication for this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a preliminary plat
for Galaxie Cliff Plaza 2nd Addition consisting of 7.59 acres with one lot and an outlot for
a medical clinic located west of Plaza Drive in the northwest quarter of Section 32 as
presented.
2651
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA 2ND ADDITION
APPLICANT: GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA PARTNERSHIP
LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECTION 32
EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 26, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 20, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary
Plat for the Galaxie Cliff Plaza 2nd Addition consisting of approximately 7.6 acres with
one 2.1 acre lot for a medical clinic, with the remaining area for future development and
extension of Plaza Drive. The 25.36 acre Galaxie Cliff Plaza Planned Development was
approved in September 1988, allowing development of the Burnet Realty building (Merrill
Lynch) and seven Outlots for Limited Business uses. The PD has a five-year length and
a condition stating that all Outlots shall be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission
and the City Council. Park Nicollet Medical Center will own and be the sole tenant of
the building.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently the proposed building site consists of grass on fill
from the previous development. There are no trees on this area. With this development,
Plaza Drive will be extended to the southwest, looping out to Galaxie Avenue at the
intersection of West Wind Trail. Lot 1, Block 1, is a portion of what previously was
platted as Outlot C in the Galaxie Cliff Plaza Addition.
SITE PLAN: Site circulation will be nearly the same as with the Burnet Realty Building,
with shared entry drives on the property lines and drive aisles that promote a continuous
flow. A covered drop-off area is provided on the front of the building. It should be
noted that this is a "walk in" type of clinic only, not an urgent care facility. There will be
no ambulance service or regular late office hours. For a medical clinic, Code requires one
parking stall for each 150 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The 20,000 sq. ft. clinic requires 133
parking stalls and 103 have been provided. Typically a net leasable square footage, rather
than the gross building area, is used when determining parking requirements in a Limited
Business district. With that scenario, 106, spaces would be required. Cross parking
easements will be provided with the Burnet Realty building and the area to the west when
it develops. All other Limited Business Code requirements and setbacks have been
satisfied.
Building elevations have been submitted, however the finish has not been selected as of
yet. Staff recommends brick in order to be consistent with the Burnet building. The
landscape plan is consistent in quantity, but the street/tree effect along Plaza Drive will
not be uniform due to the multiple species of overstory trees. The original design goal
was to have a boulevard effect such as that along Blue Cross Road. The plan should be
modified, placing only ash trees in the right-of-way.
GRADINGZ DRAINAGE ZEROSION CONTROL: This development involves the
grading of one lot and the extension of Circulation Drive south to
Galaxie Avenue. Within the proposed lot, there is a differential
in elevation of approximately 301. The proposed grading of the lot
will significantly change the topography by lowering the high point
15' and approximately matching the low point. Grading for the
street construction will consist primarily of filling with maximum
fills of 161. Cuts for street construction will be minimal.
The maximum proposed street grade is 6.7% near the intersection
with Galaxie Avenue but the city standard for 2% street grade at
the intersection is proposed.
Storm water drainage from the site is proposed to be directed into
Pond AP -14 in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Water
Management Plan. The outlet for Pond AP -14 is existing. Outlets
for two low areas west of the proposed street will be provided by
the proposed storm sewer. Storm water from low areas between the
street and Galaxie Avenue will outlet overland to Pond AP -14.
WATER QUALITY: Storm water drainage from the lot will flow into
Pond AP -14 which is classified as a Sediment Basin under the City's
Water Quality Management Plan.
The total drainage area to Pond AP -14 consists of 50 acres of which
80 percent is commercial and 20 percent residential. Pond AP -14
requires a total wet storage volume of 9.0 acre-feet in a single
cell pond or 4.9 acre-feet as a two -cell pond.
A total of 0.95 acre-feet of wet pond volume and 0.3 acres of land
is required to serve the proposed development of the one lot.
Since the required wet storage volume can be provided within Pond
AP -14, staff recommends that a cash contribution to the water
quality fund be required for the development of the lot. Wet
storage requirements for the proposed Outlot will be determined
when development occurs.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity, and depth
is available within Galaxie Avenue. The sewer is proposed to be
extended within the proposed street from the intersection with
Galaxie Avenue to serve the adjacent outlots and proposed lot.
The sewer is proposed to be connected to an existing stub within
the west boulevard of Galaxie Avenue.
An 8" water main of sufficient size, pressure and capacity to serve
the development, is proposed to be extended south from the existing
end of Circulation Drive to the intersection with Galaxie Avenue.
At the intersection the main is proposed to be connected to an
existing stub within the west boulevard of Galaxie Avenue.
e�5? co .)--
STREETlACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street access to the development will
consist of the extension of Circulation Drive south to an
intersection with Galaxie Avenue opposite Narvik Drive. In
addition, a street will be stubbed to the southwest for access to
parcel 010-28 which is presently landlocked.
RIGHT-OF-WAY%EASEMENTS/PERMITS: All required right-of-way and
easements of sufficient width based on depth of utilities for
streets and utilities will be dedicated as part of the plat.
The development will be responsible for ensuring that all
regulatory agency permits are obtained prior to final plat
approval.
X 4 3
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - GALAXY CLIFF PLAZA 2ND
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the
past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges
are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing
fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's
utility system based on the submitted plans.
Improvement Proj # use Rate Qty Mount
Water Availability 538 C/I $2,285/A 3.18 A $7,266
Charge
Trunk Storm Sewer 316 C/I .027/SF 94,900 SF 2,562
Upgrade
$9,828
GALA= CLIFF PLAZA 2ND ADDITION CONDITIONS
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on
September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
A.1,B1, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C5, D1, and E1 and F1, and G1 .
2. Cross parking and ingress/egress easements shall be provided. 103 parking stalls
shall be allowed.
3. No regular ambulance service shall be allowed.
4. All trash and recycling areas shall be contained in the building.
5. All mechanical rooftop equipment shall not be visible from Plaza Drive.
6. The building shall be constructed of brick on all four sides.
7. Tree planting shall be allowed in the right-of-way as per the landscape plan
dated 6/7/90. Only overstory ash trees shall be allowed in the right-of-way.
8. All Signage Ordinances shall be adhered to.
9. The construction of streets and utilities under public
contract to serve this development must be authorized by
Council action prior to final plat approval.
10. The development is required to provide a cash dedication of
$42,369 as fulfillment of water quality requirements in
accordance with the City's Water Quality Management Plan.
a c��
A.
B.
C.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
Easements and Rights-of-Wa
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee the acquisition costs of additional drainage,
ponding, and utility easements as required by the
alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required
public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public
right-of-way as necessary to service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development
of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
m4w
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not release
until one year after the date of installation.
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
F.
G.
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Approved:
Revised:
Advisory Planning commission city council
August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
PLATAPPR.CON
LTS #1
6/12/89
a 6 7
CUFF' F ---A=
�- 7.
our I If
3 rNc yPc,�Ti�i A
���, - i,'�, "Z 1• �, 1 _ ��� IStING VEGE�AjiD
' ✓. i ,'' ��`
DRAINAGE EAS`ENEHT�i�`^�I. 1 ,��,••%�. � .
,��'11i'1.11 �'•'�� '1' '�! J
I I l i li Igtn4b?
' � 'J� l �I '1�� (,i�' � ,r ii�ll rl. I/Ii;l I •, 11�\�.�L :.f%
A w Yc Y
rLrl
/ T
tiLl j •'ree
P40,7"
V'
GALAXI— A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN A i
EAGAN, MINNESOTA r..+.
°A* ;
Wo
Cz`
NN
...... Revision WNW—
PRELWARr RAT FOR. rw-Lm apvr"w0
GA ZA SECOND ADDITION ,ear i ooa7e IR OM
575 RA2s DWVt
r '
--,
nimlli'�i��II.I-�
v
--,
nimlli'�i��II.I-�
Flovlsions _ WAS
„. 11 Ga&DNG DM"AGL caosch CDMTaOL. DEVELO-WNT, VTs1*T nAN
�. .. T � $r.�•� soa TIb-LkM SINErWG CO,VX
PJti[laes i [w D i rLw.[as
GALA%IE CLIFF PLAZA SECOND ADDITION Wt Y, A2A 7J parv[
w , .-..� .•.sss �n.� . au ' u6b". i�.i 5.72
fit
:r.�• A, � t �� i jig,.. r f t ff
C)
Z n>
rn r-
70 r
n
Ll
;,I
9
My TI
Q �
i
i c
Q
I
p
p
= ~ rm
Y rm — >
17 n
fill m�0�
�o
j nE r r rri�
oa
z
Q
Q
Q i
Q
r-7
114
Q
Q �
�
Q
Q
Q
Q o
Q
Q
= ~ rm
Y rm — >
17 n
fill m�0�
�o
j nE r r rri�
WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE
STORM SEWER TRUNK UPGRADE
e
R�
i
v =
1` 1 •.
I
jl�ii
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION
' \ 1.
uor,3 a'SS NE. r..r• J.'.7MG -"W- MOWN Cdit*M. Of.E_yW[MT 61IL *• R..
.uct�s Rawtn
s..... .. ,... ... - G.L6Y;E CL PLAZA SECOND ADDITION r.. ..2. D -'*E
w. ....aa gra. C..aP,r"N22
U< ce
se 0 E5
ce z
< MLu
CL Z:2 U
IIIIIII! TH
P jAL
zi
It
I
I
Page 9/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNI14C.:::COMMISSION X1NUTES
June 26, 1990
Wayne Tauer of Pioneer ii *:-: �ieez-ing (applicant) stated he was
available for questions and that he had no problems with the
conditions. Member Merkley asked if a temporary cul-de-sac would be
required as a condition if Inver Grove Heights did not approve the
adjoining development. City pl,anner..turm..Stated it was not needed as
a condition. City Engineer:::::::Ftier�s�)::::::::stated that C3 adequately
addressed the issue. Member•• I+Ierk-ey•.:t�ei asked that condition 2 be
amended to prohibit driveway as::-6pposed:::to roadway, access to Dodd
Road. He further stated that condition:.::4 should be amended to
encompass street, utility and .:pirilic ..::�fety issues in the joint
powers agreement.
Merkley moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to approve a
preliminary plat consisting of 50 lots on approximately 19.8
previously zoned R-1 (Single Family) acres east of Dodd Road in the
east half of Section 24, subject to the following conditions:
1. These standard condYtci:s;.;.,.,of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, *'-19:8'i:'-:::::shall be complied with: Al, B1,
B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C3, C5, D1, Fil., F1::::and G1.
2. No direct driveway access;;:sh6:1:1' be allowed on Dodd Road.
3. The development is required to provide sanitary sewer service
to the existing sanitary sewer (provided with the Hills of
Stonebridge development) which is located on the east side of Dodd
Road approximately 40 feet north::::Qf;:::thi;s:::development.
4. A cooperative agreement b4tween::::::the Cities of Inver Grove
Heights and Eagan is required to insure fiat all street, utility and
public safety issues are resolved:: bet*een the Cities of Eagan and
Inver Grove Heights. ••••
All voted in favor.
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA 2ND:::►DDITION
GALAXIE CLIFF PLAZA PARTNERBEIP
Chairman Voracek convened:::tie::�i.eXt::pubiic hearing
preliminary plat consisting of 7.59 acres.:.:with one lot
for a medical clinic located west of *PT'aza Drive in
quarter of Section 32.
dealing with a
and an outlot
the northwest
Page 10/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNZINfz-'-'CCiNIl�'l!gglCN:;:'MINUTES
June 26, 1990 ...
City Planner Jim Sturm pres'ehtecl:'e staff report to the Advisory
Planning Commission and further stated that minor changes to the
parking would be required and that this should be resolved prior to
the Council meeting. He further explained that the City was
comfortable with the 103 stalls proposed due to the cross -parking
easements required as condi k:oii$:::;:::I::::::::a{ded that two additional
conditions should be required: 'i'iiise'kietg that all landscaped areas
shall be irrigated and secondly,::::that Plaza Drive shall be extended
to Galaxie Avenue.
Gary Nyberg, the arch project, project, introduced the
Galaxie Cliff development team::' 'He shoiii d' a model of the building and
site to the Commission. He described the driveway change and that it
was now a circular drive.
The development architect then explained that he wanted several
species of boulevard trees;.;...in order to prevent disease loss. He
further explained the landscaitg;::;:;::
John Dekoster, representing:.... th-6::::::0edica1 Center, explained the
purpose of the Center and stated:::that a...;nalghborhood meeting would be
held before the Council meeting to.;.d;suSs 'issues.
Brad Swenson, representi�ig:' ttie developer, stated that he objected
to condition 10 as well as the water quality and certain budget
costs. City Engineer Mike Foertsch explained how the costs were
derived for the water quality contribution.
Bill Soules, the owner Q...:,the..;.gxope,rty.., stated that a $42,000.00
assessment would be ruinou,$:::': t:v.::tht::;:;:::d�-v:eloper's profits. He also
stated that he could not guarantee..h'ared.'.'parking to the west of the
Center.
Member Trygg asked if only :;i&h ti?ees would be allowed in the
boulevard. City Planner Sturm stated that::::the City doesn't generally
allow plantings in right-of-way, however, the PUD agreement did allow
ash trees and that this should not be deviated from.
Member Merkley stated C4 should be added as a condition. Member
Trygg asked if cross -parking would be a �toblem if the west area was
not utilized. City Planner Sturm stated::::that it would and that the
condition should remain. C}4.a:rza;'�:;:;:.ilaraeek stated that condition 2
should be revised to react::::::::::::::tie:::::;::103 parking stalls were
conditioned upon the cross -parking and ingress and egress easements.
a2 7
Page lI/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNI0-f3'MMI'S'Sl�Tf'rIINUTES
June 26, 1990
Merkley moved, Hoeft gnd;:::'the motion to approve a
preliminary plat consisting o:7:59:: -Acres with one lot and an outlot
for a medical clinic located west of Plaza Drive in the northwest
quarter of Section 32, subject to the following conditions:
1. These standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 5:y:.387:;.::5:1 be complied with: Al, B1,
B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C4, C5, D1:---:-:: E I
2. Cross -parking and ingress::;::::.and ::;egress easements shall be
provided in order to allow 10:3:.:. ?er: i g::stat:lS.
3. No regular ambulance service shall be allowed.
4. All
building.
trash and recycling areas shall be contained in the
5. All mechanical
Plaza Drive.
6. The building shall
shall not be visible from
brick on all four sides.
7. Tree planting shall be allowed in the right-of-way as per the
landscape plan dated June 7,.,.1990,Only . overstory ash trees shall be
allowed in the right-of-way.
8. All signage ordinances shall: adhed to.
9. The construction of streets and utilities under public
contract to serve this development must be authorized by Council
action prior to final plat approval.
10. The development is required to :P -:,.:r -:.'b -vide a cash dedication of
$42,369.00 as fulfillment of .W.titer....Qua.l3.ty....requirements in accordance
with the City's Water Quality'2?riiieieaat::an.
P4, 0 0, WE 1,
:.:.:.:................................•.•.
Page 12/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNTIT COMMISSIOlf"NINUTES
June 26, 1990
11. All landscaped areas shai;:::e::: rgated.
12. The extension of Plaza Drive shall be completed to Galaxie
Avenue.
All voted in favor.
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDXNTIAL::::4AND STUDY
Kristi Marnin of the P1"nri'11::ng?egatment stated that four areas
would be examined at the evening's 1�1'anning Commission meeting. She
gave a brief overview of the residential land study and what had
occurred to date.
CITY OF EAGAN - AREA D
MULTI -FAMILY:::RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
The first multi -family land' sttdy:::a dealt with a Comprehensive
Guide Plan amendment to chi.nge t1i'e......land use designation of
approximately 9 acres from arZII.,...:.tts:::::A-I and the rezoning of
approximately 9 acres from Subject property is located
west of I -35E and south of Item! y.:: :ake in the northwest and southwest
quarters of Section 10 and --has been labeled "Area D" in the
Multi -Family Residential Land Study.
Kristi Marnin outlined the background and recommendations as
presented in the staff report.
Bill Griffith, an attone : stir: :the:::: owners, stated that the
property had been owned for 23 years. The:.:.owners were opposed to the
rezoning. He further stated the property rias rezoned in 1970 and that
the owners had granted a pondin.g:::: easerAent to the City in 1973 in
�rg
connection with the Donnywood approl. Ti'ii�::owners also agreed to the
vacation of Jurde Road. In 1982, the'.owners developed a plan for
condominiums and townhouses but didn't go forward due to economic
considerations. He stated R-1 was not an appropriate zoning because
(1) the owners' expectations and cooperation with the City in the
past; (2) R-1 was not compatible to the::::south freeway and could be
considered a regulatory taking; (3) taxes:: were paid based on medium
and high density development. He requested that the owners not be
penalized by down -zoning.
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENTIREZONINGIAREA Df
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
I Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, City of Eagan, Area D, Multi -Family
Residential Land Study, to Change the Land Use Designation of Approximately 9 Acres
from D -III Mixed Residential (6 to 12 Units Per Acre) to D -I Single -Family Residential
(0 to 3 Units Per Acre) and a Rezoning of Approximately 9 Acres from R-3 Townhouse
Residential to R-1 Single -Family Residential for Property Located West of I -35E and
South of Lemay Lake in the Northwest and Southwest Quarters of Section 10 --At its
regular meeting of June 26, 1990, the Advisory Planning Commission met to consider four
areas from the multi -family residential land study. Included was a public hearing for Area
D located west of I -35E and south of Lemay Lake in the northwest and southwest quarters
of Section 10. For additional information on this item, please review the Community
Development Department and City Attorney's staff reportw4io is enclosed on pages _
hroughcfor your review. Also enclosed on pagephrough2� a copy of
the Advisory Planning Commission minutes related to this item. The Commission is
recommending approval of the comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning as
presented.
Subsequent to the public hearing, staff received correspondence from property owners
requesting continuance of this item (copy enclosed on pagQr9„4j to the August 7, 1990
meeting to permit one of the owners who is out of town to be present.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To consider a property owner's
request for a continuance to August 7, 1990 or 2) to approve or deny the comprehensive
guide plan amendment and rezoning of multi -family residential land study Area D as
presented.
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT &
REZONING -
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
AREA D
APPLICANT: CITY OF EAGAN
LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF I -35E SOUTH OF LEMAY LAKE
NW AND SW 1/4S SECTION 10
EXISTING ZONING: R-3 TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 26, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 19, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT &
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
BACKGROUND: Over the past year, the Community Development Department has been
studying multi -family residential land use in Eagan. Multi -family residential development
was designated by the City Council as a topic for review for two primary reasons: one,
the large amount of undeveloped multi -family zoned/designated land currently available
in Eagan, and two, Eagan's higher -than -average percentage of existing multi -family units.
Three reports have been prepared as part of this comprehensive review of multi -family
residential land. These reports, entitled "Multi -Family Residential Land Study Draft
Report" (July 1989), "Update Report" (December 1989), and "Comment Report" (March
1990), are supplementary to this Advisory Planning Commission staff report and should
be used for complete information regarding study background and methodology.
Each of the three "Multi -Family Residential Land Study" reports were presented to the
City Council for review and discussion. Based on the study reports, comments from
affected property owners, and Council discussion, the City Council recommended
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments and/or rezonings for 16 of the 23 study areas.
Staff was directed to schedule public hearings for those study areas recommended for plan
amendments and/or rezonings.
STUDY AREA D: Study Area D consists of one parcel, P.I.D. 10-01000-010-57, which is
divided by I -35E. This application involves only that portion of the parcel that is west of
I -35E, which is approximately 9 acres in size. This study area is currently designated for
D -III Mixed Residential (6 to 12 units per acre) in the Comprehensive Land Use Guide
Plan and zoned R-3 Townhouse Residential.
a�3
The attached data sheets from the "Draft Report" (July 1989) and exhibits provide
additional descriptions of Study Area D.
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: The City Council recommended consideration
of a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and rezoning such that Area D would be
designated D -I Single-family Residential (0 to 3 units per acre) and zoned R-1 Single-
family Residential.
PROPERTY OWNER COMMENTS RECEIVED: The property owner, Lance Company,
has not been in contact with City staff regarding the recommended changes.
LEGAL ISSUES: As noted in the cover memo to this agenda packet, review of material
related to Area D does not indicate any special or unique legal principles or issues to be
resolved. The general principles outlined in the May 15, 1990, memo included with this
agenda packet serves as a guide in the potential plan amendment and/or rezoning of this
property.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To recommend approval or denial of
a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to change the land use designation of
approximately 9 acres within P.I.D. 10-01000-010-57 (part west of I -35E only) from D -III
Mixed Residential (6 to 12 units per acre) to D -I Single-family Residential (0 to 3 units
per acre) and a rezoning of the same land from R-3 Townhouse Residential to R-1 Single-
family Residential.
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
AREA D Area D consists of the west part of
one parcel which is split by I -35E
GENERAL LOCATION: Along the west side of I -35E south
of Lemay Lake, in the NW and SW
1/4s of Section 10
SIZE: 9 acres
Area D is of sufficient size to
support a variety of development -
intensity options.
ZONING: R-3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION: D -III
EXISTING LAND USE: vacant and agriculture
SURROUNDING LAND USE,
ZONING, AND COMP PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION: North - Lemay Lake and multi-
family residential; zoned
R-4; designated D -IV
South - vacant; zoned NB;
designated LB
East - I -35E
West - park (pond) and single-,
two- and multi -family
residential; zoned P, R-
1(PD) and R-4; designated
P, D -II and D -IV
The existing nearby uses are mainly
residential, with a range of
densities. However, the vacant
land to the south is designated for
commercial use. Considering this
variety, no single land use will be
completely compatible with all
surrounding uses. Buffering will
be necessary regardless of
development type.
TOPOGRAPHY: The site contains gently rolling
slopes throughout.
Area D's topography is suitable to
- PAGE D.1 -
2aS
VEGETATION:
ACCESS:
UTILITIES:
ASSESSMENTS:
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
most development types. Extensive
grading should be unnecessary.
Area D is primarily open grassland
(and crops), with the exception of
relatively dense mixed wood with
understory vegetation around the
edge of Lemay Lake and the pond to
the west.
Most development intensities can be
sensitive to the existing
vegetation around Lemay Lake and
the off-site pond. Landscaping
requirements of any proposed
development can mitigate the loss
of other existing vegetation.
Area D borders Marice Drive and
High Site Drive, both LOCAL
STREETS. Although the site also
abuts I -35E, no direct access would
be allowed.
The access currently provided to
Area D is sufficient to accommodate
low -intensity uses. Direct land
access would be allowed to both
Marice and High Site Drives.
Sanitary sewer and water service is
available to Area D. Storm sewer
service is potentially available
given the proximity of existing
lines.
Utility service to Area D should
not be an issue.
Area D has not been assessed.
Lemay Lake, on the northern border
Area D, is designated a General
Development Lake under the City's
shoreland ordinance. This
ordinance does not restrict uses,
but applies separate performance
standards for development near
waters governed by this ordinance.
In addition, Lemay Lake is a
protected wetland (Lake) also under
the jurisdiction of the Department
- PAGE D.2 -
of Natural Resources. The pond
immediately adjacent to Area D is
not a protected wetland.
A DNR permit will be necessary for
any development which affects Lemay
Lake.
Area D may receive traffic noise
from I -35E, although an existing
earthen berm along the site's
eastern border provides some
buffering.
Also, although not technically
located in an aircraft noise zone,
the site may be impacted by
aircraft noise. Developments which
minimize associated outdoor
activities and utilize noise-
attenuable construction may be most
appropriate. Future occupants of
development on Area D should be
informed of potential noise
impacts.
- PAGE D.3 -
Lac -
'm IRS
��"`'►,
14R&M
J
NK
9
..
N
lvlm��.Ify is
L NK
0
_,
r.
PLOl�
I
.■wA�A
U
zoo,
EB—: L
4k- MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
N
STUDY AREA D
EXISTING ZONINC
_..dwj
ISMO !WAu��
•
•
............... .........
Page 12/EAGAN ADVISORY PL&NN1-ff-$ COMMISSI014:44INUTES
June 26, 1990
11. All landscaped areas S )r-1gated.
12. The extension of Plaza Drive shall be completed to Galaxie
Avenue.
All voted in favor.
MULTI -FAMILY RES Z1>XKTIAL:::VM STUDY
Kristi Marnin of the P16iffii-ng stated that four areas
be examined at the anning Commission 'meeting. She
would evening's Pl
gave a brief overview of the residential land study and what had
occurred to date.
CITY OF EAGAN -'AREA D
MULTI -FAMI LY:::3tE$ IDENTIAL LAND STUDY
..........
The first multi -family lan'd"""�'s*'i'-u"'a,y::.:4(r,e.a dealt with a Comprehensive
Guide Plan amendment to chOnge "'the .....-land use designation of
approximately 9 acres from and the rezoning of
approximately 9 acres from subject property is located
west of 1-35E and south of L-tK V:::L.Ake in the northwest and 'southwest
,
quarters of Section 10 and-.::::*'h'as been labeled "Area D11 in the
Multi -Family Residential Land Study.
Kristi Marnin outlined the background and recommendations as
presented in the staff report.
Bill Griffith, an attorney.:.:.:.- owners, stated that the
property had been owned for 23 years. Thp,:.:.pwners were opposed to the
rezoning. He further stated the pro-P4*rty v4s rezoned in 1970 and that
the owners had granted a pond in.ig*`.::*: easement to the City in 1973 in
connection with the Donnywood approv'"a"'l. T1ie"':owners also agreed to the
vacation of Jurde Road. In 1982, the"o""V'ners developed a plan for
condominiums and townhouses but didn't go forward due to economic
considerations. He stated R-1 was not an appropriate zoning because
(1) the owners' expectations and cooperation with the City in the
past; (2) R-1 was not compatible to tho.::::*outh freeway and could be
considered a regulatory taking; (3) tax0',t**.:':were paid based on medium
and high density development. He requo-9ted that the owners not be
penalized by down -zoning.
Page 13/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING'-'-COMMI'SSIbg.:::MINUTES
June 26, 1990
Bob Reny of Jurde Road ask **"a::::x:::::tae::park would remain. Ms. Marnin
stated the park was owned b::::iie::C'ity and she was unaware of any
plans for change. Carl Olson, one of the owners of Area D, gave a
background of the park dedication.
Wayne Larson gave further park information.
Claire Chesnick had a " 'p"ark ::k36�7 dart' question and stated she
supported the rezoning.
Chairman Voracek asked what:::�ype of:`gtreet access was available
to the property. Ms. Marnin sta-ted tiat:::tical streets were available.
Chairman Voracek asked what. the Capacity of a local street was.
Community Development Director Runkle stated he was unsure but that
the high site development still had a potential for 300 more units,
therefore generating more traffic. Member Merkley stated that traffic
is congested now during certain times of the day in the area.
Attorney Griffith asked :::::any: traffic studies had been prepared.
Ms. Marnin stated no. The '' att:arney;.:., then stated that any traf f is
considerations would be sheer tpecUlation. Ms. Marnin further
clarified the tax issue by stating that::::Dakota County said that the
taxes were based on residenti:a.�;::::tii:y: With no distinction between
density of residential.
Member Merkley doubted that this would be a regulatory taking
because there were numerous R-1 developments along 35E in other
areas. City Attorney Dougherty stated that the taking issue had not
been analyzed but that the rezoning would need to take all viable use
of the property away in order....for....a;.:.taYing.. to occur.
Chairman Voracek asked . . .a)5out ' "- theimpact of the development on
LeMay Lake. Ms. Marnin stated that::;bis iia' act could be analyzed upon
development of the property. City- ::Attor oy Dougherty asked what the
connection was between the rezoning:: ::in 19-jb:and the easement grant in
1973. Attorney Griffith stated that there" -:::'Was no connection but that
this would show the owners' cooperation in the past.
Chairman Voracek stated that if the property were rezoned, a
subsequent rezoning could also occur if tbe.developer proved hardship
under the new zoning.
Member Trygg stated that;:;:sZi:::;fQ;�t:;:::th::;:three objections raised by
the landowners' attorney Wtt-d::'4Rt::::cQatp :l ling and that the area was
more compatible with the surrounding R-1 than with its present
zoning.
Page 14/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNXNG,:*: OI-MSSION ;MINUTES
June 26, 1990
Trygg moved, Hoeft seeo��::::::::::':'the motion to approve the
recommended Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to change the land use
designation of approximately 9 acres from D -III Mixed Residential
(6-12 units per acre) to D -I Single Family Residential (0-3 units per
acre). All voted in favor.
Trygg moved, Hoeft :e'e'c,6hd*.Pd: -:----- iffip.. motion to approve the
recommendation to rezone approximAily 16::::"cres from A (Agricultural)
to R-1 (Single Family Residential) loo.ated on the west side of
Federal Drive along Violet Lane..:: -I; . the.:. rtheast quarter of Section
16 based on the following:
1. Increased traffic and the resultant public safety concerns.
2. R-1 was more compatible with the other uses in the area.
3. The maintenance of Water. Quality and Air Quality in the area.
4. The reduction of new :i .r.::: -:-::expanded facilities that would be
required under the current zoning..upon:_:t�?�velopment.
All voted in favor.
CITYF::'AGAN - AREA I
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing regarding a
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to change the land use designation
of approximately 16 acres ..from,.....D-.I.I.I....to D -I and the rezoning of
approximately 16 acres fa to Single Family. The
subject property is located... 'the west"side of Federal Drive along
Violet Lane in the northeast quarter':bf SeO-*t'don 16.
Kristi Marvin of the Planninit::: Depk�tment presented the staff
report to the Planning Commission. She also distributed photographs
of the area provided by the landowners.
John Daubnee, an attorney representing Harry Lemeiux, the
landowner at Federal Drive and Violet Lane, stated the property
should not be rezoned to R-1 for the follo�i3-`ng reasons:
1. There was no access
2. There was no problem
with availability
of utilities.
July 11, 1990 tJ
Mr. Dale Runkel
City Of Eagan
Dear Dale:
I am writing to request an extention of time to
appear before the City Council regarding the Lance
Company property in Eagan. We are scheduled for a
hearing next week and Mr. Burger co—owner, is out
of state.
Please grant us a continuance from next weeks meeting.
kin
dest
regards,
Carl Olson
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENTIREZONING AREA
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
IC Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, City of Eagan, Area I, Multi -Family
Residential Land Study, to Change the Land Use Designation of Approximately 16 Acres
from D -III Mixed Residential (6 to 12 Units Per Acre) to D -I Single -Family Residential
(0 to 3 Units Per Acre) and a Rezoning of Approximately 16 Acres from A (Agricultural)
to R-1 (Single -Family Residential) of Property Located on the West Side of Federal Drive
Along Violet Lane in the Northeast Quarter of Section 16 --At its regular meeting of June
26, 1990, the Advisory Planning Commission held public hearings to consider four areas
of the multi -family residential land study. The public hearing for a comprehensive guide
plan amendment and rezoning of Area I was among these. For additional information
concerning this item, please refer to the Community Development Department and City
Attorney's staff report which is enclosed on pagesthrough-�9ior your review.
Also enclosed on pages through 2241, -for your review is a copy of the Advisory
Planning Commission minutes related to this item. The Commission voted to deny the
comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning to change the use from D -III (Mixed
Residential) to D -I (Single -Family Residential) and the rezoning from A (Agricultural) to
R-1 (Single -Family Residential) and further acted to recommend that the parcel's
comprehensive guide plan designation be changed from D -III (Mixed Residential, 6 to 12
units per acre) to D -II (Mixed Residential, 0 to 6 units per acre) and further that the
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission review this park service area for additional
parkland needs. Apart from the denial of the proposed rezoning, the Advisory Planning
Commission made no recommendation concerning rezoning this parcel.
Given the Commission's action, the Council may consider several courses of action. They
may approve or deny the original recommendation for Area I or they may continue this
item with direction to staff and Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission to further
study the recommendation of the Advisory Planning Commission to change the
comprehensive guide plan designation of Area I from D -III to D -II. Because this public
hearing was not noticed as a consideration of changing the parcel's guide designation from
D -III to D -II, however, it would appear necessary to direct a new public hearing for this
specific recommendation if the Council chooses to pursue it.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To approve or deny the
comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of multi -family residential land study
Area I as originally presented or 2) to continue this item with direction to staff and the
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission to review the recommendation of the Advisory
Planning Commission and set a new public hearing for its consideration.
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT &
REZONING -
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
AREA I
APPLICANT: CITY OF EAGAN
LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF FEDERAL DRIVE ALONG VIOLET
LANE
NE 1/4 SECTION 16
EXISTING ZONING: A AGRICULTURAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 26, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 19, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT &
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
BACKGROUND: Over the past year, the Community Development Department has been
studying multi -family residential land use in Eagan. Multi -family residential development
was designated by the City Council as a topic for review for two primary reasons: one,
the large amount of undeveloped multi -family zoned/designated land currently available
in Eagan, and two, Eagan's higher -than -average percentage of existing multi -family units.
Three reports have been prepared as part of this comprehensive review of multi -family
residential land. These reports, entitled "Multi -Family Residential Land Study Draft
Report" (-July 1989), "Update Report" (December 1989), and "Comment Report" (March
1990), are supplementary to this Advisory Planning Commission staff report and should
be used for complete information regarding study background and methodology.
Each of the three "Multi -Family Residential Land Study" reports were presented to the
City Council for review and discussion. Based on the study reports, comments from
affected property owners, and Council discussion, the City Council recommended
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments and/or rezonings for 16 of the 23 study areas.
Staff was directed to schedule public hearings for those study areas recommended for plan
amendments and/or rezonings.
STUDY AREA I: Study Area I consists of three parcels, P.I.D.s 10-01600-010-06, 10-
01600-010-05 and 10-01600-012-07, approximately 16 acres in size (total). This study area
is currently designated for D -III Mixed Residential (6 to 12 units per acre) in the
Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan and zoned A Agricultural.
a��
The attached data sheets from the 'Draft Report" (July 1989) and exhibits provide
additional descriptions of Study Area I.
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: The City Council recommended consideration
of a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and rezoning such that Area I would be
designated D -I Single-family Residential (0 to 3 units per acre) and zoned R-1 Single-
family Residential.
PROPERTY OWNER COMMENTS RECEIVED: The property owners, Rodney and Judy
Horgen (10-01600-010-06), Harry and Pearl Lemieux (10-01600-010-05), and G. William
Smith (10-01600-012-07), have indicated in meetings with City staff and through written
correspondence that they are all opposed to the recommended plan amendment and
rezoning. In general, the property owners indicated they feel that single-family residential
development is inappropriate for their properties, and that such a change could adversely
affect the value of their properties. (See Page 8 and Appendix A of the "Comment
Report" for additional details on comments received).
LEGAL ISSUES: As noted in the cover memo to this agenda packet, review of the
material related to Area I does not indicate any special or unique legal principles or issues
to be resolved. The general principles outlined in the May 15, 1990, memo included with
this agenda should serve as a guide in the potential plan amendment and/or rezoning of
this area.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To recommend approval or denial of
a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to change the land use designation of
approximately 16 acres within P.I.D.s 10-01600-010-06, 10-01600-010-05, and 10-01600-012-
07 from D -III Mixed Residential (6 to 12 units per acre) to D -I Single-family Residential
(0 to 3 units per acre) and a rezoning of the same land from A Agricultural to R-1
Single-family Residential.
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
AREA I Area I consists of three parcels
GENERAL LOCATION: On the west side of Federal Drive
by Violet Lane, in the NE 1/4 of
Section 16
SIZE: 16 acres
Area I is of sufficient size to
support a variety of development -
intensity options.
ZONING: A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION: D -III
EXISTING LAND USE: The two parcels on the north side
of Violet Lane each have a single-
family dwelling unit. The parcel
on the south side of Violet Lane is
vacant.
Single-family residential
development of Area I could
incorporate the existing dwellings,
while other development types may
require removal of these dwellings.
SURROUNDING LAND USE,
ZONING, AND COMP PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION: North - multi -family residential;
zoned R-4; designated D -
III
South - single-family
residential; zoned R-1;
designated D -II
East - I -35E
West - single-family
residential; zoned R-
1(PD); designated D -I
The existing uses surrounding Area
I are residential, both single- and
multi -family. Considering this
factor, residential development of
a density or design that would be
compatible with both single- and
multi -family uses would be
- PAGE I.1 -
301
appropriate.
TOPOGRAPHY: The terrain of Area I drops
steadily from the northeast to the
southwest. A small ravine runs
northeast/southwest through the
parcel on the south side of Violet
Lane.
The topography of Area I should be
suitable to most development
intensities, although those with
smaller building pads would likely
require less grading.
VEGETATION: A significant number of mature, but
scrubbish, trees are located along
the edge of the ravine. In
addition, the two parcels with
dwellings are landscaped.
Less -intense development could
potentially be designed around the
ravine and thus alleviate wholesale
removal of the natural vegetation.
Some of the landscaping around the
existing dwellings, given its
dispersal, would be removed
regardless of the level of
development.
ACCESS: Area I has access to Violet Lane, a
LOCAL STREET, and Federal Drive a
NEIGHBORHOOD COLLECTOR.
The access currently provided to
Area I is sufficient to accommodate
lower -intensity developments.
Direct land access would be allowed
to both Violet Lane and Federal
Drive.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer, storm sewer and
water service is available to all
parcels in Area I.
Utility service to Area I should
not be an issue.
ASSESSMENTS: Area I has been assessed at single-
family rates for storm sewer trunk
improvements. In addition, one
- PAGE I.2 -
3 0�-
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
parcel has a pending assessment for
street improvements at single-
family rates.
Development on Area I may receive
traffic noise from I -35E. Although
the noise levels received from this
roadway may not be consistently
severe, development design should
be sensitive to traffic noise
generated by principal arterials.
- PAGE I.3 -
303
1
r
low'
mop
2% ;Afesja 'age
Ap
9
-gniGM
a ala a 11 _'
�1� W-41 alb is Ail
ultri
;."k-610.409
i PSSO
r�
ImW;1►IPI&Ma110
or"!
0.=
.m
I�rA
its
I
Cl
a
Mom W"
.m
I�rA
its
I
Cl
a
_ i r
w
ae� mow•
a■ lima
■ M2W4&%bit Aa
immill�� •
be&lrA
ltr r
ICIA:01412 IRM
NONE
I o
dr
W. UAW_ ,, •� �."-:+ 441 I
9
Page 14/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNT#�i:;:::-C "H'NIi IOht:::�tINUTES
June 26, 1990
Trygg moved, Hoeft sea=eti:' motion to approve the
recommended Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to change the land use
designation of approximately 9 acres from D -III Mixed Residential
(6-12 units per acre) to D -I Single Family Residential (0-3 units per
acre). All voted in favor.
Trygg moved, Hoeft secorrd:ac:I motion to approve the
recommendation to rezone approxima:+- 'ly ion:::%"cres from A (Agricultural)
to R-1 (Single Family Residential) lo.C.ated on the west side of
Federal Drive along Violet Lane.:;:ih. the•:rtrtheast quarter of Section
16 based on the following:
1. Increased traffic and the resultant public safety concerns.
2. R-1 was more compatible with the other uses in the area.
3. The maintenance of Water Quality and Air Quality in the area.
4. The reduction of nes;+:'.:*::' r:::::::expanded facilities that would be
required under the current zoning uptiri:':Qvelopment.
All voted in favor.
CITY :M!.-::1A*GAN - AREA I
MULTI-FAMILV`kESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing regarding a
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to change the land use designation
of approximately 16 acres from ......Dr.I.1.I....to D -I and the rezoning of
approximately 16 acres froi;::::':gr:clttiira to Single Family. The
subject property is located bh� 'th'e:vest" side of Federal Drive along
Violet Lane in the northeast quarter::::of Seddon 16.
Kristi Marnin of the Plannini::: Dep i:tment presented the staff
report to the Planning Commission. She a3;so distributed photographs
of the area provided by the landowners.
John Daubnee, an attorney representing Harry Lemeiux, the
landowner at Federal Drive and Violet Lane, stated the property
should not be rezoned to R-1 for the follo. ng reasons:
1. There was no access
2. There was no problem
with 'Ava l'abiY ty
3.0
of utilities.
....................
........................
............................
.............................
............................
.............................
............................
.............................
..............................
...................* * * * '
Page 15/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNii4;5""*C*'O*'M'*M"ISSION'.:'::'1*4'INUTES
June 26, 1990
h ..
3. The County had appraised::E::Et-....px'ety at $73,000-00.
4. The property has been assessed in the past.
5. There is no market for single family for this type of
property.
..............
................
...........
6. Rezoning to R-1 may be ... a ... ke *ghi 1:6 t ::"-ta k i n g .
7. The location of the huge apprtment:::-complex immediately to the
north.
S. The property was bett6r'r:--s---u1 e ... or townhouses or duplexes and
the properties to the south were of lower elevation.
He further stated that Eagan had rezoned the huge apartment and
created the problem. He requested a reasonable zoning and stated that
a down -zoning from D -III to:::j>.!-!.II would be feasible. Chairman Voracek
..........
asked if the owners would be'::':j�b.b-eptive to a D -II zoning. Mr. Daubnee
stated they would.
Harry Leneiux stated that t -h*' ':�:t
.Wy w * eren notified of the apartment
development. He gave backgrouiiO,::::::.b.f.::'�'.."t'-"h"'e''"'a"rea development and stated
that a pond had been stated single family was not
appropriate because of the 4Y.a'y'barn-like apartments. He asked for a
chance. City Engineer Foertsch stated that the City would research
the ponding issue prior to the Council presentation.
Judy Lemeiux-Horton, another landowner, stated that her home had
been on the market for a even get an offer because
of the apartments.
Pearl Leneiux had drainage concerns.
Rythe Franke of Hampton Height-*S*::::state"'d:: that she wanted space for
children and presented a petition that:':*:'the land be made into
parkland. Chairman Voracek explained that the property would have to
be dedicated or purchased by the City.
Rob Brown, resident, asked where the Hampton park money went.
Chairman Voracek stated the City Hall wOld research the issue for
him upon request. Chairman Voracek then stated that he felt the area
was not suitable foreither ' that the Comp Guide and
the zoning should be brou44ii:::-!--- ":::tbm'Pliance in any event. Member
Merkley stated that the apartment is ...:qverbearing and that a good
compromise would be a D -II zoning. He fiiether stated that this type
3�1
:.:.:....................................
Page 16/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNII C COMMISSI09:'::.IgINUTES
June 26, 1990 ...
of buffering made sense.Citi:,Atri'Dougherty explained that the
Planning Commission must ei't2ier•••"approve or deny the Council
recommendation for rezoning to R-1.
Member Hoeft stated that the Parks Department could evaluate the
petition of the landowners but:-:•that-.-D,-I;.:.j.ust didn " t fit and would be
completely incompatible. Mem3 r:: ' y g....'tat-ed that the City had always
tried to have buffers and that this:::caould:::be a logical place for one.
She could readily envision an R-2 use'.
Voracek moved, Merkley .%ecori(l cl,,.t e:: motion to recommend denial
of a Comprehensive Guide Plar:::: amd?serit to change the land use
designation of approximately....16 acres' from D -III Mixed Residential
(6-12 units per acre) to D -I Single Family Residential (0-3 units per
acre). All voted in favor.
Voracek moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to recommend denial
of a rezoning of approximatej:y.:.16 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1
Single Family Residential �tb..... :!,operty located on the west side of
Federal Drive along Violet Laiie•-':iti::;• ti.e.:.northeast quarter of Section
16. All voted in favor.
Voracek moved, Merkley secoxd�lte''motion to recommend that the
parcel I be consideredlige from D -III to D -II in the
Comprehensive Guide Plan and. -'reviewed by Parks for park area needs.
All voted in favor.
CITY OF EAGAN - AREA J
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
Chairman Voracek opened tae ri$Xt:::::: public hearing regarding a
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment t.o chan(c.p the land use designation
of approximately 7.5 acres from Mixed Resa:dential to Limited Business
and a rezoning of approximately :::::? . 5 66res from Agricultural to
Limited Business. The subject property : located on the south side
of Yankee Doodle Road east of Coachman R64d in the northwest quarter
of Section 16.
Kristi Marnin presented the staff report to the Advisory Planning
Commission.
Don Sandberg (owner) stated that theif"rezoning was not necessary
and that the pond levels hack: e::?~a;si:. He had concerns that his
taxes would go up.
3 c2
—
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENTYAREA JI
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
L. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, City of Eagan, Area J, Multi -Family
Residential Land Study, to Change the Land Use Designation of Approximately 7.5 Acres
from D -III Mixed Residential (6 to 12 Units Per Acre) to LB (Limited Business) and a
Rezoning of Approximately 7.5 Acres from A (Agricultural) to LB (Limited Business) for
a Property Located on the South Side of Yankee Doodle Road East of Coachman Road
in the Northwest Quarter of Section 16 --At its regular meeting of June 26, 1990, the
Advisory Planning Commission held public hearings to consider four areas of the multi-
family residential land study. These included a hearing concerning the comprehensive
guide plan amendment and rezoning of Area J of the multi -family residential land study.
For additional information concerning this item, please refer to the Community Develop-
ment Department and City Attorney's staff report which is enclosed on page,
through for your review. Also enclosed on pages through.� are the
Advisory Planning Commission minutes with respect to this item. A Commission motion
to approve the comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning as presented failed on
a tie vote.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM
comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning
residential land study as presented.
3 t3
To approve or deny the
of Area J of the multi -family
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT &
REZONING -
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
AREA J
APPLICANT: CITY OF EAGAN
LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAST OF
COACHMAN ROAD
NW 1/4 SECTION 16
EXISTING ZONING: A AGRICULTURAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 26, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 19, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT &
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
BACKGROUND: Over the past year, the Community Development Department has been
studying multi -family residential land use in Eagan. Multi -family residential development
was designated by the City Council as a topic for review for two primary reasons: one,
the large amount of undeveloped multi -family zoned/designated land currently available
in Eagan, and two, Eagan's higher -than -average percentage of existing multi -family units.
Three reports have been prepared as part of this comprehensive review of multi -family
residential land. These reports, entitled "Multi -Family Residential Land Study Draft
Report" (July 1989), "Update Report" (December 1989), and "Comment Report" (March
1990), are supplementary to this Advisory Planning Commission staff report and should
be used for complete information regarding study background and methodology.
Each of the three "Multi -Family Residential Land Study" reports were presented to the
City Council for review and discussion. Based on the study reports, comments from
affected property owners, and Council discussion, the City Council recommended
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments and/or rezonings for 16 of the 23 study areas.
Staff was directed to schedule public hearings for those study areas recommended for plan
amendments and/or rezonings.
STUDY AREA J: Study Area J consists of one parcel, P.I.D. 10-01600-010-26,
approximately 7.5 acres in size. This study area is currently designated for D -III Mixed
Residential (6 to 12 units per acre) in the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan and
zoned A Agricultural.
3t �/
The attached data sheets from the 'Draft Report" (July 1989) and exhibits provide
additional descriptions of Study Area J.
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: The City Council recommended consideration
of a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and rezoning such that Area J would be
designated LB Limited Business and zoned LB Limited Business.
PROPERTY OWNER COMMENTS RECEIVED: Bradley Smith, representing the
property owners, Donald and Betty Sandberg, has indicated in meetings with City staff and
through written correspondence that the Sandbergs are not opposed to the recommended
plan amendment provided that some flexibility in developing the property is maintained.
However, the Sandbergs do object to any rezoning of their property at this time because
they feel it may limit their ability to market the property and because they feel it may
adversely affect their property taxes. The letter submitted by Mr. Smith regarding the
Sandbergs comments on the recommended changes is attached to this report.
LEGAL ISSUES: Bradley Smith, representative of the property owners, has written a
letter to the City addressing a number of factors for consideration by the City in analyzing
a rezoning. The property owners have indicated that they agree to the Comprehensive
Guide land use designation change of the property to LB Limited Business, but do not
support the rezoning of the property to LB Limited Business from A Agricultural. The
property is not being farmed presently and the property owners have a single-family
residence on the property. Under Minnesota Statutes 473.865, should the City
redesignate this property as LB Limited Business under the Comprehensive Guide Plan,
the City would be required to bring its zoning ordinance into compliance with the
Comprehensive Guide within nine months of the change of the Comprehensive Guide.
Thus a Comprehensive Guide change to LB Limited Business would require a zoning
change to LB Limited Business.
With respect to real estate taxes, the Dakota County Assessor's Office has informed City
staff that the zoning designation of the property has little to do with the assessment
method for the property. The real estate taxes are assessed based on the use of the
property and not on the zoning. Therefore, since the property owners are presently using
the property as a single-family residence, the property will be taxed as a single-family
residence rather than the Agricultural designation which it is presently zoned.
The property owners have raised the issue of assessments against the property, and it
should be kept in mind that assessments are a charge against the property in connection
with public improvements, and again regardless of what the zoning classification of the
property may be, the City could not levy an assessment against the property greater than
the benefit that the property has received from the public improvement.
And finally, the property owner has raised the issue of access. To the extent that the
property is presently a distinctive identified parcel, the property owners are entitled to
reasonable access from their property to a public right-of-way. But it should be kept in
3is
mind that the rezoning of the property is in contrast to the actual development of the
property and at issue is rezoning the land use and not with any development concerns.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To recommend approval or denial of
a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment to change the land use designation of
approximately 7.5 acres within P.I.D. 10-01600-010-26 from D -III Mixed Residential (6 to
12 units per acre) to LB Limited Business and a rezoning of the same land from A
Agricultural to LB Limited Business.
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
AREA J Area J consists of one parcel
GENERAL LOCATION: On the south side of Yankee Doodle
Road east of Coachman Road, in the
NW 1/4 of Section 16
SIZE: 7.5 acres
Area J is of sufficient size to
accommodate a variety of
development -intensity options.
ZONING: A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION: D -III
EXISTING LAND USE: vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE,
ZONING, AND COMP PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION: North -
commercial and vacant;
zoned NB and A;
designated NB and R & D
South -
single-family
residential; zoned R-
1(PD); designated D -I
East -
townhouse residential;
zoned R-4; designated D -
III
West -
single-family residential
and vacant; zoned R-
1(PD); designated D -III
The range of uses around Area J
indicates that no single land use
type will be completely compatible
with all surrounding uses.
Buffering will be necessary
regardless of development type.
TOPOGRAPHY: The terrain drops from Yankee
Doodle Road on the north to a large
pond/marsh in the center of Area J,
then rises steeply in the southeast
corner up to the adjacent property.
Extensive filling would be
necessary with any type of
- PAGE J.1 -
3/7
development in order to provide a
stable building pad.
VEGETATION: Area J is heavily wooded
throughout. Dense aquatic
vegetation is located in and around
the pond.
Development of any type would
require removal of significant
amounts of vegetation. Landscaping
requirements for any proposed
EL development may not adequately
mitigate the loss of aquatic
vegetation.
ACCESS: Area J has access to Yankee Doodle
Road, a MINOR ARTERIAL.
Adequate access to serve most
development types is available,
although direct land access to
Yankee Doodle Road should be
prohibited.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer, storm sewer and
water service is available to Area
J.
Utility service to Area J should
not be an issue.
ASSESSMENTS: Area J has been assessed for storm
sewer trunk improvements and
lateral benefit from trunk water
main service at single-family
rates.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: The pond/marsh on Area J is a
protected wetland (Class IV deep
marsh) under jurisdiction of the
Department of Natural Resources.
Less -intense developments can often
be more sensitive to wetland
requirements. Nevertheless, a DNR
permit will be necessary for any
development which affects this
pond.
In addition, Area J may be impacted
by traffic noise from Yankee Doodle
- PAGE J.2 -
3 T
Road. Although the noise levels
received from this roadway may not
be consistently severe, development
design should be sensitive to
traffic noise generated by minor
arterials.
- PAGE J.3 -
31�
SCHEIDE, SMITH AND LOFSTROM, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PHILIP N. SCHEIDE
BRADLEY SMITH
JAMES C. LOFSTROM
CARRIE G. MARSH
March 26, 1990
Mr. Dale C. Runkle
Director of Community Development
Eagan City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Donald and Betty Sandberg
Dear Mr. Rinkle:
4635 NlcoLs RD. • SUITE 206
EAGAN, MIN 55122
(612) 454.8440
This office represents Donald and Betty Sandberg with respect to the
proposals contained in the Multi -Family Residential Land Study of
July 1989, and the Comment Report dated March 1990.
The Sandbergs have no objection to revising the comprehensive guide
plan designation of their property from D -III to Limited Business.
However, they do object to any rezoning of the property at this time,
and they object to any restriction on access to the property at this
time. The rer.ainder of this letter will explain the reasons for the
Sandberg's position. This letter in not intended to go into the
legal rarifications in any detail, except to state that to the extent
that any of the changes proposed result in a reduction in market
value of the property, the Sandbergs reserve the right to make any
appropriate claims for compensation.
As the Lard Study dated July 1989 appropriately states, development
of the property under the existing D -III designation could be
suitable if development standards limit the impact on the pond and
the existing vegetation. Property to the east and the south of
subject property has developed as townhouses and small lot single
family homes, making D -III development appropriate. Any development,
whether D -III or otherwise would have to consider such impacts.
However, the commercial development to the north of the property,
across Yankee Doodle Road, would make commercial development under a
Limited Business designation appropriate as well. The Sandbergs have
no objection to changing the comprehensive guide plan designation to
Limited Business with the understanding that comprehensive guide plan
designations are not intended to be the same as zoning
classifications, and that a certain amount of flexibility is intended
SCHEIDE, SMITH AND LOFSTKOM, P.A.
Page 2
Mr. Dale C. Runkle
March 26, 1990
to exist in comprehensive guide plan designations. In short, the
Sandbergs have no objection to attempting to market and develop the
property as Limited Business property, but they feel it would be
inappropriate to tie their hands if a residential development
sensitive to the referenced environmental concerns is proposed in the
future for the property. Any change of the comprehensive guide plan
designation should include language allowing for flexibility in this
regard.
For the same reasons, a rezoning to Limited Business would be
inappropriate. Some flexibility is required and it would be
important to wait until development of the property to determine the
appropriate zoning.
Another reason the Sandbergs are opposed to a zoning change at this
time is a concern, that this will adversely affect the taxes against
the parcel. At this time, the parcel contains one single family
dwellina which is currently being rented. A rezoning from
Agricultural to Limited Business would undoubtedly result in a
substantial increase in taxes before the development of the parcel.
This wo,,ald be completely inappropriate given the current use of the
property. Given the willingness of the Sandbergs to accept a change
in comprehensive guide designation subject to the condition stated
above, it would be inappropriate for the City to insist on a zoning
chance at this time. In addition, change in the zoning of the
property would result in the City reevaluating assessments against
the parcel, and in all likelihood increasing assessments
considerably. This is inappropriate given the undeveloped state of
the property at this time.
Finally, the Sandbergs object to any restriction on access to Yankee
Doodle Road. The parcel has been effectively land locked by
surrounding development approved by the City of Eagan.
That is, no access to the parcel was allowed at the time of
development of the properties to the east and the south. There is no
guaranty that in the future access would be allowed from the parcel
to the west. If the Sandbergs' parcel develops in conjunction with
the parcel to the west, then at that time it may be appropriate to
discuss access questions. However at this time, with development of
both parcels uncertain, discussion of restricting the access is not
appropriate.
In summary, the Sandbergs will not have any objection to changing the
comprehensive guide plan designation of their property to limited
business if the resolution making that change allows for flexibility
for an appropriate D -III development; the Sandbergs strongly oppose
SCHEIDE, SMITH AND LOFSTROM, P.A.
Page 3
Mr. Dale C. Runkle
March 26, 1990
any rezoning at this time; and the Sandbergs strongly oppose any
restriction on access to the parcel.
Thank you very much.for your consideration of these comments.
Very ruly,yours,
Badley S,.i
BS:h's
cc: Don and Betty Sandberg
3�
-0•
dolb
►''� IL
rj � !
owA
\` 'a -,X,
r
DY%
m
•
a
a
•
l 11
F I pm -10 W_
■r r
clu
ir;
OEM ■
AN
�. MULTI -FAMILY HE5IDENIIAL LAND
STUDY A
PROPOSED COMP LAND USE C
db
•PARK
ley TV
1 : .
a
IA
AL
m r
:.: a
am
i
sin`ior'
NMI
116� w
_AND STUD`
Page 16/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNI.M COMMISSI02i:::kINUTES
June 26, 1990
of buffering made sense. City::::rsrziey.:-'Dougherty explained that the
Planning Commission must eithez''' approve or deny the Council
recommendation for rezoning to R-1.
Member Hoeft stated that the Parks Department could evaluate the
petition of the landowners but:.:•that.•.:D.-I,.;..J.ust didn't fit and would be
completely incompatible. Member::::{I'yg:::S:taed that the City had always
tried to have buffers and that this::::would.:::be a logical place for one.
She could readily envision an R-2 use. •.••
Voracek moved, Merkley ser, -.on
.l,..the:::motion to recommend denial
of a Comprehensive Guide Play:::: amediiierit to change the land use
designation of approximately ... '16 acre's from D -III Mixed Residential
(6-12 units per acre) to D -I Single Family Residential (0-3 units per
acre). All voted in favor.
Voracek moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to recommend denial
of a rezoning of approximatel.y..;.16 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1
Single Family Residential ir:::::pxaperty located on the west side of
Federal Drive along Violet Lane ii::t ie....northeast quarter of Section
16. All voted in favor.
Voracek moved, Merkley seco; cdg4 ::::th6''motion to recommend that the
parcel I be considered fo::::::ange from D -III to D -II in the
Comprehensive Guide Plan and"reviewed by Parks for park area needs.
All voted in favor.
CITY OF RAGAN - AREA J
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
Chairman Voracek opened ::tie rieX:t::: public hearing regarding a
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment -t -o change the land use designation
of approximately 7.5 acres from Mired Residential to Limited Business
and a rezoning of approximately ;:;7..5 E�& from Agricultural to
Limited Business. The subject property 3e::located on the south side
of Yankee Doodle Road east of Coachman Rued in the northwest quarter
of Section 16.
Kristi Marnin presented the staff report to the Advisory Planning
Commission.
Don Sandberg (owner) stated. that thik"rezoning was not necessary
and that the pond levels iiaa-'� beeii::::ra: sec . He had concerns that his
taxes would go up.
3�7
Page 17/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNINg"COMMISSION::::MINUTES
June 26, 1990
Martin DesLauriers (realtor::::f-#i{ her) said he opposed the
rezoning.
Rob Brown (neighbor) distributed a letter to the Advisory
Planning Commission. He stated he had environmental concerns and that
Limited Business use would deValue.•the._surrounding homes. He opposed
Limited Business rezoning.
Greg Gee (neighbor) stated that'- the '-ptflperty should be purchased
by the City for a reserve.
Pat Kness stated she was agai+i:st 'tY::xe�zoning.
Mr. Sandberg reiterated his tax concerns. Member Trygg asked if
the City was compelled to rezone if the Comp Guide was changed. City
Attorney Dougherty stated that the City must rezone if the Comp Guide
is changed. Chairman Voracek had questions regarding the tax effects.
Ms. Marnin stated that the assessor had told the City that the taxes
were based on the current us:that. being a Single Family homestead.
City Attorney Dougherty stated*:��€h t;::h-e:..:had checked specifically with
the Assessor on this property:And thatit, would only be assessed at
commercial rates if it were vaunt. Mr...:::::bd-sLauriers gave examples of
taxes going up when the zoning Y'A-aged. Member Trygg stated that
she had a lot of questions... ga-r-ing the development because of the
wetlands, etc., and felt tri�t:".rezoning would be premature at this
time.
Member Merkley stated that the DNR would not allow fill into the
wetland in any event and that the zoning would not affect it.
Chairman Voracek discussed it ion issues and the
rezoning's affect on the tree$ :'Oh*::.thie::::$ .�e:;::::::
Merkley moved, Hoeft seconded :::the Qtion to recommend approval
of a Comprehensive Guide Plan apendmeht-:. to change the land use
designation of approximately 7.5 At"res €rom D -III Mixed Residential
(6-12 units per acre) to LB (Limited Business) in order to make the
site more harmonious with the existing Yankee Doodle businesses in
the area. Members Hoeft and Merkley voted for the motion. Members
Trygg and Voracek voted against the motion.
The motion failed.
33°
Agenda Information Memo
July 17, 1990 City Council Meeting
REZONINGZAREA UNIULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
M. Rezoning, City of Eagan, Area L, Multi -Family Residential Land Study, of
Approximately 29 Acres from R4 Multiple Residential to I-1 (Industrial) for Property
Located on the West Side of Kennebec Drive and Silver Bell Road in the Southeast
Quarter of Section 18 --At its regular meeting of June 26, 1990, the Advisory Planning
Commission held public hearings on four areas of the multi -family residential land study.
Among these was a public hearing on a rezoning of Area L located west of Kennebec
Drive and Silver Bell Road in the southeast quarter of Section 18. For additional
information on this item, please refer to the Community Development Department and
City Attorney's staff report which is a closed on pages3,� 2- through -3 o for your
review. Also enclosed on page,.'Sd7is a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission
minutes concerning this item. The Commission is recommending approval of this rezoning
as presented.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a rezoning of
multi -family residential land study Area L of approximately 29 acres from R-4 multiple
residential to I-1 (Industrial) as presented.
�231
SUBJECT: REZONING -
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
AREA L
APPLICANT: CITY OF EAGAN
LOCATION: NORTHWEST SIDE OF KENNEBEC DRIVE AND
SILVER BELL ROAD
SE 1/4 SECTION 18
EXISTING ZONING: R4 MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 26, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 19, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARnIENT &
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
BACKGROUND: Over the past year, the Community Development Department has been
studying multi -family residential land use in Eagan. Multi -family residential development
was designated by the City Council as a topic for review for two primary reasons: one,
the large amount of undeveloped multi -family zoned/designated land currently available
in Eagan, and two, Eagan's higher -than -average percentage of existing multi -family units.
Three reports have been prepared as part of this comprehensive review of multi -family
residential land. These reports, entitled "Multi -Family Residential Land Study Draft
Report" (July 1989), "Update Report" (December 1989), and "Comment Report" (March
1990), are supplementary to this Advisory Planning Commission staff report and should
be used for complete information regarding study background and methodology.
Each of the three "Multi -Family Residential Land Study" reports were presented to the
City Council for review and discussion. Based on the study reports, comments from
affected property owners, and Council discussion, the City Council recommended
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments and/or rezonings for 16 of the 23 study areas.
Staff was directed to schedule public hearings for those study areas recommended for plan
amendments and/or rezonings.
STUDY AREA L: Study Area L consists of five parcels. However, this application
involves only two parcels, P.I.D.s 10-68060-020-00 and 10-68060-031-00, approximately 29
acres in size. This study area is currently designated for IND Industrial in the
Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan and zoned R-4 Multiple Residential.
The attached data sheets from the "Draft Report" (July 1989) and exhibits provide
332
additional descriptions of Study Area L.
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: The City Council recommended consideration
of a rezoning such that Area L would be zoned I-1 Limited Industrial, and would thence
be consistent with the existing Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designation.
PROPERTY OWNER COMMENTS RECEIVED: The property owners, Norman and
Patricia Vogelpohl, have indicated in meetings with City staff and through written
correspondence that they are not opposed to the recommended rezoning for the two
parcels involved in this application, provided that the City grants building permits for two
apartment buildings on Lots 4 and 5 of the approved Silver Bell Addition. (See Page 10
and Appendix A of the "Comment Report" for additional details on comments received).
LEGAL ISSUES: Area L presents a unique set of circumstances. The property owner
of Area L has recently been levied assessments against his property for storm sewer trunk
improvements at multi -family rates. Any rezoning of a property, albeit to an increased
intensity, needs to be reviewed in light of the property owners' investment backed
expectations. Thus, if a property owner has significantly invested in the R-4 use
classification, a rezoning could lead to a taking despite the fact that the property owner
is rezoned to a higher "use". Such a case of taking may in the end be moot if damages
could not be proven, but the fact that a potential lawsuit may exist is important to keep
in mind.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To recommend approval or denial of
a rezoning of approximately 29 acres within P.I.D.s 10-68060-020-00 and 10-68060-031-00
from R-4 Multiple Residential to I-1 Limited Industrial.
333
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
AREA L
GENERAL LOCATION:
SIZE:
ZONING:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USE,
ZONING, AND COMP PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION:
Area L consists of five parcels,
two platted as lots and three
platted as outlots of Silver Bell
Addition.
On the west side of Kennebec Drive
and Silver Bell Road in the SE 1/4
of Section 18
34 acres
Area L is of sufficient size to
accommodate most development -
intensity types.
R-4
IND
vacant
Northeast -
industrial; zoned I-
1; designated IND
Northwest -
vacant; zoned I-1;
designated IND and P
Southeast -
commercial and
vacant; zoned I-1
and I-1(PD);
designated IND
Southwest -
single- and multi-
family residential;
zoned A, R-1 and R-
4; designated IND
The existing uses around Area L
range from residential to
industrial. As such, no single
land use type will be completely
compatible with all surrounding
uses. Considering the overall
industrial character of the area,
expansion of residential uses may
be inappropriate. Buffering,
possibly through a transitional
use, will be necessary.
- PAGE L.1 -
33�
TOPOGRAPHY: The northern section of Area L is
mostly flat, except for a large
earth/sand pile probably moved here
from an off-site excavation.
The southern parts of Area L are
generally flat, but are at a higher
elevation than Silver Bell Road and
the northern parts of the site.
The topography of Area L is
suitable to all development
intensities.
VEGETATION: Area L is open grassland.
Landscaping requirements for any
proposed development should
adequately mitigate any loss of
existing vegetation.
ACCESS: Area L has access to Kennebec
Drive, a LOCAL STREET, and Silver
Bell Road, a NEIGHBORHOOD
COLLECTOR.
The access currently provided to
Area L is sufficient to accommodate
lower -intensity developments.
Direct land access would be allowed
to both Kennebec Drive and Silver
Bell Road.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer, storm sewer and
water service is available to all
of the parcels in Area K with the
exception of two parcels. One of
these parcels has available
sanitary sewer and water service,
and can potentially be served by
storm sewer lines. The remaining
parcel has available sanitary
service and can potentially be
served by water and storm sewer
lines nearby.
Utility service to Area L should
not be an issue.
ASSESSMENTS: Two of the five parcels have
pending assessments for storm sewer
trunk improvements at multi -family
- PAGE L.2 -
33�
rates. The remaining three parcels
have not been assessed.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Area L is adjacent to the Seneca
Wastewater Treatment Plant and may
on occasion receive odors from
plant operations. However, as part
of the pending facility expansion,
an odor control program has been
initiated which may reduce the
potential of nuisance -level odors
reaching this area.
- PAGE L.3 -
33(0
�-I�
SILVER BELL ROAD
INNS
4b- MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
N STUDY AREA L
PARCELS
33-7
I I i I I
`SILVER BELL ROAD
INDUS
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
N STUDY AREA L
EXISTING ZONING
3,38
\.�
SILVER BELL ROAD
4
4*- MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
N STUDY AREA L
PROPOSED ZONING
3,3�
�i:
.� 61 04 DU
IL
Mel
SILVER BELL ROAD
I N!
•.•
LLAS .,,9
ILS
/BELL
CENTV
4.. MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
N STUDY AREA L
EXISTING/PROPOSED COMP LAND USE GUIDE PLAN
Page 18/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNINQ"COMMISSION::::MINUTES
June 26, 1990
CITY OF : A 1>::+::: MEA L
MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY
Chairman Voracek opened the next public hearing regarding a
rezoning of approximately 29 acres from R-4 Multiple Residential to
Industrial. The subject prQ�aerty;;::::::i.:.:.:::;gcated in the west side of
Kennebec Drive and Silver the southeast quarter of
Section 18.
Kristi Marnin presented the :;::staff :::r:eport and stated that the
owner was not opposed to the..:.:reonitig.:: as long as Lots 4 and 5
received their building permits.:':::::::
Chairman Voracek stated that he had a problem with this condition
and that the action tonight had no bearing on Lots 4 and 5 and the
owner must abide by all City ordinances in order to get his building
permits.
Member Merkley stated that:::e:;:f:a.yored I-1 use and that there were
many semi -trucks driving in the area::::::::::::
Member Hoeft stated that the:::prox:1M:i:ty.::to Seneca and the smell as
well as environmental concerns f.avcired:::i'ezoning.
Hoeft moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to recommend approval
of a rezoning of approximately 29 acres from R-4 Multiple Residential
to I-1 (Industrial). The subject property is located on the west side
of Kennebec Drive and Silver Bell Road in the southeast quarter of
Section 18.for the following reasons:
1. The proximity to the h 4h1y:::bbritr:4versial Seneca plant.
2. The heavy truck traffic in thi6::::area � ',
All voted in favor.
CITY OF EAGAN - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Chairman Voracek opened the last public hearing of the evening
regarding an ordinance amending Chapters::::J;X and 13 of the Eagan City
Code pertaining to general requirements for:::4'Past Delinquent Bills".
City Finance Director ariOwris3te gave an overview of the
ordinance and review of tie : history o'f the delinquent escrow
accounts.
3 �//