05/01/1990 - City Council Regulara
1 AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
PAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, XIR?ESOTA
MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
MAY 1, 1990
6:30 P.K.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE)
P, ZiA. RESOLUTION Authorizing the Issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds
(FHA Insured) Relating to an Existing Multifamily Housing Development (Crossroads
of Eagan Project - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) Series 1990A and Taxable Multifamily
Housing Revenue Refunding .Bonds (Crossroads of Eagan Project - FHA Insured
Moitgige Loan) Series 1990B
•3 O B. PROJECT 542, Final Assessment Hearing (Alden Ponds - Streets & Utilities)
C. PROJECT 4528, Final Asse.ssment''Hearing (Pond AP -50, Trunk Storm Sewer)
3 c D. Project 473, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Pilot Knob Road
' Trunk Storm Sewer)
E. PROJECT 494, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Wescott Road
Streets & Utilities)
F'PROJECT 491, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Eagan Hill Farms
Trunk Utilities)
G. PROJECT 505, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Country Hollow
(�' Trunk Utilities)
II.
6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
ry I III.
?
6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSIRESS (BLUE)
IV.
6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK)
P. 2
A.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
3
B.
LICENSES, Plumbers
P•.
C.
FINAL PLAT, Lexington Pointe 6th Addition
D.
CONTRACT 90-06, Receive Bids/Award contract (Cray, Coventry Pass 2nd & Effress
'
Additions -Storm Sewer)
r%
fTreatment
E.
CONTRACT 89-13, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Cliff Road Water
Plant)
F.
PROJECT 589, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Elrene & Kost Road -
Utilities & Streets)
VEHICLE #145, Receive Bids/Authorize Purchase (Public Works Front End Loader)
P. 8G.
H.
CONTRACT 90-04, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Rahn Road
Reconstruction)
I.
CONTRACT BB -K, Final Acceptance (Manor Lake - Streets & Utilities)
i J.
CONTRACT 89-16, Approve Change Order 01 (Stearns Addition - Streets & Utilities)
K.
AGREEMENT Between Dakota County, City of Eagan, Dakota Electric/Cost Sharing of
Aerial Photography and Stereo Digitizing
V.
7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON)
P, ZiA. RESOLUTION Authorizing the Issuance of Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds
(FHA Insured) Relating to an Existing Multifamily Housing Development (Crossroads
of Eagan Project - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) Series 1990A and Taxable Multifamily
Housing Revenue Refunding .Bonds (Crossroads of Eagan Project - FHA Insured
Moitgige Loan) Series 1990B
•3 O B. PROJECT 542, Final Assessment Hearing (Alden Ponds - Streets & Utilities)
C. PROJECT 4528, Final Asse.ssment''Hearing (Pond AP -50, Trunk Storm Sewer)
3 c D. Project 473, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Pilot Knob Road
' Trunk Storm Sewer)
E. PROJECT 494, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Wescott Road
Streets & Utilities)
F'PROJECT 491, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Eagan Hill Farms
Trunk Utilities)
G. PROJECT 505, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Country Hollow
(�' Trunk Utilities)
VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID)
A. RECONSIDERATION of Area K for Rezoning Process in R-4 Study (Request to be
�• Continued)
B. REZONING, Diffley Cedar Planned Development, Koldt Properties, to Amend the
n Splashland PD to Allow a Nixed Use Multi -Family Residential and Retail Development
{l' and a COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT for Specification of Development within
an Existing CPD Designation of Approximately 41 Acres Located in the Northwest
Corner of the Intersection of Hwy 77 and Diffley Rd in the SW 1/4 of Section 19
VII. M BUSINESS (TAN)
8O A. SPECIAL PERMIT, City of Apple Valley, Burnsville and Eagan to Allow a Police
�Firearms Range to be Located in a Light Industrial District, SE 1/4 of Sec 8
B. SPECIAL PERMIT, Eagan Christian Center, for Two Years to Allow the Eagan Christian
Center to Use a Building Located on Light Industrial Zoned Property for Purpose
of Holding Church Meetings, Cedar Industrial Park R.L.S., Part of Tract F
�}l��C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Elizabeth A. Aird, to Allow a Veterinary Clinic in a CSC
y' (Community Shopping Center) District on Lot 4, Block 1, Town Centre 100,6th
1 Addition Located on South Side of Denmark Ave in the North Half of Sec 15
13 D. CONSIDERATION of Traffic Signal, Coachman Road & Yankee Doodle Road
P'
VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD)
IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN)
X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
%I. ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 26, 1990
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR MAY 1, 1990 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
After approval is given to the May 1, 1990 City Council agenda and regular meeting
minutes for April 17 and Board of Equalization minutes for the April 24 meeting, the
following items are in order for consideration.
There are no formal items of Department Head Business scheduled at this time.
Questions for staff or City Council or the handling of additional items that would normally
occur at the end of the City Council meeting are appropriate prior to consideration of the
Consent Agenda.
Agenda Information Memo
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
qw A l
There are eleven (11) items on the agenda referred to as Consent items requiring one
(1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in
further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under
Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
A. PERSONNEL ITEMS
Item 1. Civil Engineering Interns --There were approximately 30 applicants for the two
Civil Engineering Internships available this summer with the Engineering Division. After
the applications were screened, eight applicants were invited to the Eagan Municipal
Center for interviews. It is the recommendation of Assistant City Engineer Foertsch that
Patricia Gutzmann and Mike Pike be hired as Civil Engineering Interns for the City of
Eagan.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Patricia
Gutzmann and Mike Pike as temporary Civil Engineering Interns for the City of Eagan.
Item 2. Summer Recreation Program Assistant --After interviews, it is the
recommendation of Recreation Supervisor Nowariak that Jill Gruenke be hired as the
Seasonal Summer Recreational Program Assistant for this coming season.
Agenda Information Memo
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Jill Gruenke
as Seasonal Summer Recreation Program Assistant.
Item 3. Seasonal Park Department Workers --After interviews, it is the recommendation
of Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde that the following be hired as seasonal park
workers:
Seasonal Parks Maintenance
Roy Newland
Christopher Darwitz
David Smith
Michael Marxer
Mike Finnegan
Tyrone Johnson
Joel Kivi
Ballfield Attendants
Richard Marhula
Timothy Gill
Dean Downs
Agenda Information Memo
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of the above-
named persons as seasonal park workers.
LICENSEIPLUMBERS
B. Licenses, Plumbers --There are five (5) plumbers' licenses that are in order for
consideration:
1) Bruce Plumbing
2) Domestic Mechanical
3) Northbridge Plumbing
4) Palma Plumbing
5) Plumber Ted
There are also two (2) water softner licenses to be issued to Bruce Plumbing and Metro
South Water Conditioning.
All seven (7) license applications meet City Code regulations and are in order for
consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the five (5) plumbers'
licenses and two (2) water softner licenses as presented.
FINAL PLAT LEXINGTON POINTE 6TH ADDITION
C. Final Plat, Lexington Pointe 6th Addition --All conditions, including the development
agreement, for consideration of the Lexington Pointe 6th Addition final plat have been
received, reviewed and are in order for consideration. Please refer to the final plat
drawing enclosed on page T for your review.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for
Lexington Pointe 6th Addition as presented.
3
z
0
0
0
Q
Z
X
U)
W
F—
z
n0
l_1..
0
z_
X
W
J
F.
Q
,I
�I
T
`
5 Ia
1'o
11
w��d
I
np
f Q�
;i If-� �•��1
I
U-6ci
p lj1el.1N � . �i 1;0 X11
M cr 00.0"
I 1
M
t796
� �I
F.
Q
,I
�I
I
•a
1 i
S
i J
.86
5 Ia
1'o
11
w��d
I
np
f Q�
t
I
•a
1 i
S
i J
.86
5 Ia
1'o
11
w��d
I
np
f Q�
Ill
e
Agenda Information Memo
May 3, 1990 City Council Meeting
RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CON'T'RACT (CRAY, COVENTRY PASS 2ND
& EFFRESS ADD. -STORM SEWER
D. Contract 90-06, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cray, Coventry Pass 2nd & Effress
Additions -Storm Sewer) --At 10:30 a.m. on April 27, 1990, formal bids were received for
the installation of stprm sewer facilities at several locations combined under this contract.
Enclosed on page lF is a tabulation of the bids received with a comparison of the low
bid to the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held
for each respective improvement. All bids will be further evaluated for compliance with
plans and specifications and any deviations will be addressed by the Public Works Director
along with the status of the required easement acquisitions on May 1st.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 90-
06 (Cray, Coventry Pass 2nd & Effress Additions -Storm Sewer), award the contract to the
lowest responsible bidder and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related
documents.
500,
EFFRESS ADDITION.—CRAY ADDITION & COVENTRY PASS 2ND ADDITION
CITY CONTRACT NO. 90-06
RAGAN MINNESOTA
1990
CONTRACTORS
1. Fredrickson Excavating
2. Ceca Utilities
3. F. F. Jedlicki
4. Danner, Inc.
5. Mille Lac Contractors
6. Landwehr Heavy Moving
7. Northdale Const.
8. S. M. Hentges & Sons
9. Austin P. Keller
10. Nodland Const.
LOW BID
Feasibility Estimate
Engineer's Estimate
% Over (+) Under (-) F.R.
% Over (+) Under (-) E.E.
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M.
BID DATE: FRIDAY, APRIL 27, 1990
TOTAL BASE BID
$ 186,390.50
$ 186,982.00
$ 197,280.50
$ 200,859.05
$ 205,650.30
$ 211,993.40
$ 212,412.00
$ 230,558.70
$ 234,912.00
$ 249,051.50
$ 186,390.50
$ 214,210.00
$ 225,000.00
- 12.99%
- 17.16%
214.210 $225,000 $186,390.50
(9
Preliminary
`k over(+)
Engineer's
% over(+)
Report
Under (-_]_
Estimate
Under (-)
Low Bid
Effress Addition
$ 105,480
- 29.15
$ 97,000
- 22.96
$ 74,729.50
Cray Addition
$ 60,190
+ 23.06
$ 78,000
- 5.04
$ 74,068.00
Coventry Pass
$ 48,540
- 22.55
$ 50.000
- 22.55
$ 37,593.00
2nd
214.210 $225,000 $186,390.50
(9
Agenda Information Memo
May 3, 1990 City Council Meeting
CONT. 89-131APPROVE PLANSfAUTHORIZE AD FOR BID
CLIFF ROAD WATER TREATMENT PLANT
E. Contract 89-13, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Cliff Road Water Treatment
Plant) --Detailed Plans and Specifications have been completed for the construction of the
City's second Water Treatment Plant located at the intersection of Cliff and Pilot Knob
Roads. They are being presented to the City Council for review and authorization to
proceed with public advertisement and solicitation of formal bids. A pre-bid conference
proposed for May 30th, with the final bid opening scheduled for June 13th with final
contract award being considered at the June 19th Council meeting. The Director of Public
Works and consulting engineer will be available to review and discuss any aspect of these
Detailed Plans and Specifications to whatever extent the Council may desire.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 89-
13 (Cliff Road Water Treatment Facility) and authorize advertisement for a bid opening
to be held at 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, June 13, 1990.
Agenda Information Memo
May 3, 1990 City Council Meeting
PROD. 5891RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORTIORDER PUBLIC HEARING
ELRENE & KOST ROAD -UTILITIES & STREETS
F. Project 589, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Elrene & Kost Road -
Utilities and Streets) --In response to a Petition submitted by the developer of the
proposed Wescott Square Addition near the intersection of Kost and Elrene Road, the
Council authorized the preparation of a detailed feasibility report. In reviewing the
requirements of this proposed development and the anticipated needs of the proposed
Woodlands North Addition presently being processed through the Advisory Planning
Commission, it is determined prudent to expand the scope of this project to incorporate
the upgrading of Elrene Road from Yankee Doodle Road to the Windtree Addition as
well as Kost Road. Subsequently, this feasibility report has now been completed and is
being presented to City Council for review and consideration of scheduling a public
hearing for formal presentation to all potentially affected property owners.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for
Project 589 (Elrene and Kost Road -Utilities and Streets) and schedule a public hearing
to be held on June 5, 1990.
P6
Agenda Information Memo
May 3, 1990 City Council Meeting
VEHICLE #145 RECEIVE BIDS AUTHORIZE PURCHASE
(PUBLIC WORKS FRONT END LOADER)
G. Vehicle #145, Receive Bids/Authorize Purchase (Public Works Front End Loader) --
At 2:00 p.m., Friday, April 20th, formal bids were received for the purchase of an
Articulated 160 HP Front End Loader (Unit #145) for the Street Maintenance Division
of the Public Works Department. The specifications soliciting bids were prepared with
several alternates relating to purchase price with and without the "total cost to bid" format
which provides a guaranteed maximum maintenance expenditure by the City of Eagan as
well as a guaranteed repurchase rice for this machine at the end of 5 years. Enclosed
on pages through is a memo prepared by the Superintendent of
Streets/Equipment tabulating and evaluating the bids received with a recommendation for
Council's consideration. The purchase of this vehicle has been provided for in the
approved 1990 budget. Both the Director of Public Works and Superintendent of
Streets/Equipment will be available to answer any questions or provide additional
information as may be necessary.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Vehicle #145
(Public Works Front End Loader) and authorize the purchase from the lowest responsible
bidder.
iN
MEMO TO: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: ARNIE ERHART, SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS/EQUIPMENT
DATE: APRIL 25, 1990
SUBJECT: LOADER BID COMPARISON AND EVALUATION (UNIT 145)
Bid opening for one articulated loader with plow and wing was held
in the City Hall at 2:00 p.m., on April 20, 1990. Bids were
received from Ziegler Inc. for a new Cat Model 905E and a low hour
Cat 950E; Case Power and Equipment for a new Case Model 821; and
a No Bid from Carlson Lake State Equipment.
By Council direction, four alternate bids were included in the
proposal.
Alternate I: Total cost bid with trade-in of our 1978 Model
A-64 Ford Loader (Unit 122)
Alternate II: Total Cost Bid with no trade-in
* Alternate III: Base price only with trade-in and no guaranteed
maintenance or buy back
* Alternate IV: Base price only with no trade-in and no
guaranteed maintenance or buy back
* Because there was no reduction of price for alternates III and
IV, the Bid Tabulation and comparison includes only Alternate
I and II.
In an attempt to perform a fair evaluation of the bidder's
equipment, we specified that vendors provide the City of Eagan the
same model of the piece of equipment it intended to bid, for one
working day, so the City could evaluate it's performance. An
evaluation of the Cat 950 and Case 821 was conducted at our
Maintenance Facility by the Street Supervisor, Chief Mechanic/Shop
Supervisor, and the Street Maintenance personnel.
While each machine had some minor differences in operation, they
both performed equally well during the evaluation
� rD
■l
i o
LID�
cben
�
94
94
fj). *-,
ao
r -I
ri
0o
�o
N
N
rel
u
II
II
II
�+
UlCh
0
IIN
MN
IIco
d
41
II
th
ro
II NNN
4
V
II to
H .-1
II u
II
yr �►
�
II
14
II $4 W
M
uL1qr
N � r-1
II O U)
00
O ON
II pC 0%
-
LO r%
0
4J 0 41 -4 R
4141 �
IIp3p+.'m
N
11
00 w4)
9-ri
aU
41 41 11
r-1 °
OR
$4 II
W
00
co r -q 11
LO
•.� to 04— O
4j IT II
Cn
•
O
N_ 1-1 U
0
0
to N II
ro
ri
000
a
v
ro
'a to O Q
to
a
iir-+Lno
N
$4 r -I r..
IICD
0) A
II
LO
li
F II
b
C4
lNd
I
rN-1
ii
awe aH b
II
0 0 it
sa ka14WM
N 41
U 00t-
b4J�
az r-1 ii
x 0)
00
rbc
u 0
N
-q
4) E 11
a Ur
0 ;p +-1
O
bA II
d
$4� II
N
3
II
O
4-)-1 $4
Da
00
rlV 0 II
a%D
N r-1 II
U'1
N
O O+ II
Cn
-
C? 4! II
r-1
10D
ra NII
�
r♦
+� II
V•
O II
u
n
n
II
II
$4E- -�
O
a.1 b 0 .
roW
N II
tOb V
d
-P C V •pip r? 'C3
to 1
9
-V
IV M U 4)
m ii
1
a
■l
i o
LID�
cben
�
94
94
fj). *-,
ao
r -I
ri
0o
�o
N
N
rel
A N
0 `
4
4$4i
4J 41
uL1qr
00 O
04.0 U .41
LO r%
0
4J 0 41 -4 R
• •
0%
00 w4)
OR
--1
t 41 04 ?A
tr}
•.� to 04— O
N_ 1-1 U
0
N
rp 4
W W tto o
000
•
ro
'a to O Q
to
r• -H-A
N
$4 r -I r..
LO
go to 41
Cn
I
Ott 1-I d b
awe aH b
v}
0 0 it
b4J�
rbc
u 0
°0°'
000
b
0 ;p +-1
O
d
N
O
erg
�.
4l ro y 41 fufu
d'
Nh
UO•N.0V'C
10D
V•
$4E- -�
a.1 b 0 .
roW
tOb V
-P C V •pip r? 'C3
IV M U 4)
0
o:.
N
N
o�
ro b r -I
aa)A ro
4.) -4
m
O
to
wr
ODD lin
o
e
O
oro
ON
ro-H04r
U)
0 %D
OO 4)
O
-
-�
H •r+ U I.1 A ro
o
o
N
••
o
N
,�
H
z
CA *
Ln
Ln
W
Ln
O
4)
coo
IA
b
O
00
o
0
un
�
-44
O
O
en
O -H
-
LO
04-)
In
i
O $410
OUB
l'
r� 4J V
sR
4) O
C 0.0
+
1
+b
•ri
'� •r1 r• -i
V
O
N
&ro
�01G01'o9m
U
4J
WEOE
4)
��A
r-4 9U
v
C 41
s~ U
0 4)
0
41 N
k:�4)
9
4)
$4
$4
9
b
M
it x
to
0 41
U ro
0
41
: a
t7
0
M
E
go �
TOM COLBERT
PAGE 3.
APRIL 25, 1990
Specification Compliance
I. The Caterpillar 950E meets all of our specifications.
II. The Case 821 does not meet our specifications in the following
areas.
Specification Exception
A. Radiator: Modular core design Standard single core
automotive type.
B. Transmission Type: Planetary Countershaft -heavier
full power shift tooth loading - Case
stated compliance.
C. Differential: Conventional Torque proportioning
which will cause tires
to wear on hard
surfaces.
D. Axles: 20" oscillation each side Case stated compliance
but manual states only
15.4"
E. Brakes: Air operated parking brakes Manual applied cable
type
F. Steering: hydraulic stops Case was frame mounted
rubber stops
G. Hydraulics: reusable hose ends Compression fittings
that are not reusable
H. Air Horn Electric horn
I. Steps on either side for easy entry One side only -
additional cost of
$475
J. Alternator: 50 amp brushless Case states compliance
but alternator uses
brushes
K. Testing System: Diagnostic connector Case states compliance
to test electrical functions but is only checking
circuit when key is
turned on
TOM COLBERT
PAGE 4.
APRIL 25, 1990
n
L. Bucket wear plates: must be bolt Welded - more
on type difficult for
replacement
M. Bucket: Mounting to be compatible A compatible coupler
with Balderson hitch on existing is offered for an
City loader additional $2650
N. Controls for plow & wing: Pilot operated -
Mechanically operated hydraulic electric selenoid
valves operated - not as
reliable over an
extended period and
less expensive
IV. Other Design Factors
The Caterpillar 950E includes the following additional design
advantages:
A. Box section frame instead of C section for greater strength.
B. Four plate loader tower for more strength and protection for
lift cylinders.
C. Hydraulic system test ports for ease in trouble shooting
hydraulics.
D. Cast Z bar linkage for rebuildability.
E. Patented XT series hydraulics hose.
F. "O" ring faced hydraulic connections.
IV. The Cat 950 loader is a proven machine with over 800 operating
in Minnesota alone. Cities currently operating Cat 950E
loaders:
Burnsville Minnetonka
Bloomington Richfield
Edina Plymouth
Eagan
Presently there are no Case 821 loaders in operation in the
seven county metro area. A major concern is reliability and
availability of a replacement machine during a snow storm.
Ziegler has many units available and a full stock of parts.
1 3
TOM COLBERT
PAGE 5.
APRIL 25, 1990
V. Presently the City of Eagan owns one Cat 950E loader. There
would be an added value of having two machines with parts
compatibility of better than 95%.
VI. The resale value history between the Cat 950 and the
competitive Case loader shows that in 10 years the 950 would
be worth about $37,500 in today's dollars, and the Case 821
about $23,500. In addition, going out to a 15 year time
frame, the Cat 950 will be worth about $31,000 and the Case
821 about $15,000. These values show that an additional
investment of City funds will be more than offset by the extra
value of the 950E at trade-in time in 10 to 15 years.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
Our 1978 Model A-64 Ford loader (Unit 122) has been a high
maintenance cost machine. At the present time it is not reliable
and major work would have to be done to the plow to make it
operational. Because of the condition of the loader and the amount
of usage it would get, I would recommend a trade-in on the new
loader. Because we no longer maintain the compost site, the usage
should decrease.
While the delivery for Case is 60 to 90 days, and Ziegler for 60
to 75 days, the low hour machine has been on rent to the
Metropolitan Airports Commission for snow removal and would be
available within 3 weeks with installation of plow and wing within
60 days. This would give us the availability of utilizing it more
during this summer's construction season.
BID ANALYSIS
Cat 950
Low Hour Case 821
Purchase Price
With Trade -In $117,873.00 $113,720.00*
Cat 950E low hour loader would be $4153 more initial cost
than Case
Total Bid Price
With Trade -In $ 55,923.80
$ 63,305.00*
Cat 950E low hour loader would cost the City $7,381.20
less than Case over a 5 year period.
* Adjusted price to include specified compatible coupler
and steps.
TOM COLBERT
PAGE 6.
APRIL 25, 1990
Because the Cat 950E low hour loader meets or exceeds our
specifications, has an earlier delivery date, and provides the
lowest total cost over the next 5 years, I think this machine would
best meet the needs of the City of Eagan. I recommend the City of
Eagan purchase the Caterpilar 950E low hour machine from Ziegler
Inc. in the amount of $117,878.00. This machine has less than 400
hours and would have the full five-year warranty.
a -a 941Jf
Arnie Erhart
Superintendent of Streets/Equipment
AE/nab
Attachment
strt:colbert.115
15
ATTACMCENT I
Comments from 10 major, local construction companies that are in
the business of making money with heavy equipment
Alexander Const. 688-2755 (Bill) Strictly Cat loaders, reason
is parts and service. "When you need the
machine you know it is ready." "Zieglers is the
standard by which the others are judged. Have
staff to address any problem. Machine
population supports Cat's superiority."
Bituminous Roadway 457-8462 (Ron Nelson) They have 3 brands -
Fiat, Terex, and Cat. "Cat without a doubt
will save you money in the long haul." Fiat
transmission went out at 5,000 hours, Terex at
7,000 hours. Cat(s) had 14,000 hours with
original transmission. Has examined Case -
feels Cat is heavier built where needed.
Encon 894-3200 (Ray) Exclusively run Cat loaders.
"They are the best."
Barbarossa & Sons 720-2208 (Ken) They have all Cat loaders.
"Wouldn't go with anything else. They have had
other brands in the past (Fiat, JD, Hough,
Case). Now they buy strictly Cat.
Enebak 333-1307 (Kent) " A majority of our equipment
is Cat because we can't affort any downtime and
the great parts and service available." "Our
920 loader is indestructible."
Fischer Const. 432-7132 (Pete Fischer) They have Michigan,
Komatsu, Dresser, and Cat loaders. "Nobody
builds a better loader than Cat, and nobody
compares with their parts and service and
resale." 950, 966 - "Cat builds best loader
in that size" - determining factor is dealer -
good parts and service, at Ziegler - more value
for dollar with Cat.
C.S. McCrossan 425-4167 (Larry) They have almost all Cat
loaders except for 2 small JD's. "Parts and
service warrants spending the extra money."
Northdale Const. 428-4868 (Tom Wilesbski) They have all Cat
loaders because he said, "They are the best,
most reliable, and have great resale value.
Ziegler is a very good house. Our equity is
our equipment." Resale is key. Reliability
is incredible. Cat is far above everyone else.
I(V
Attachment I (continued)
E.J. Kraemer 890-3611 (Bob Miller) They have about 150
rubber tired loaders; 145 are Cat. Bob said,
"Buying Cat is the best thing you can do
because of their resale, reliability, and parts
and service." He has done extensive research
and comparison and found they get more for
their dollar with Cat.
Opus 454-4444 (Victor Buchols) They have a 950 and
966 Cat because they are the most reliable.
They hire 30 to 40 trucks to haul at a time and
can't afford to have a loader go down. They
have had other brands in the past and now just
buy Cat. "The new 950 is a gem."
strt:colbert.115
11
Agenda Information Memo
May 3, 1990 City Council Meeting
_CONT. 90-04/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE AD FOR BIDS
(RAHN ROAD RECONSTRUCTION -STS & UTILSJ
H. Contract 90-04, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Rahn Road Reconstruction -
Streets and Utilities) --The preparation of detailed plans and specifications for the
reconstruction of Rahn Road under the above -referenced contract has now been
completed and is being presented to the City Council for their review and authorization
to advertise for the solicitation of competitive bids. These plans have been prepared in
accordance with a specific Council directive incorporating the following areas of past
specific concerns:
1. An 8' bituminous trail will be constructed along the east side only of Rahn Road
from Diffley to Beau De Rue Drive. An alternative bid is being requested to
replace a segment of this trailway from Jade to Fire Station #1 with concrete for
further evaluation by the Council.
2. Street width between Diffley and Beau De Rue Drive will be 44' wide at the
intersections to accommodate the appropriate turn lanes and will taper down to a
maximum width of 36' which will preclude any consideration for allowing future on -
street parking.
3. Rahn Road from Diffley to Shale Lane will be reconstructed to the MSAS Standard
of 44'. No trailway is proposed along this segment due to the existing 8' bituminous
trail along the east side.
These detailed plans have been personally reviewed with the affected property owners by
representatives of the consulting firm during the preceding week. The Public Works
Director and consultant will be available to provide any additional information as necessary
regarding this item.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 90-
04 (Rahn Road Reconstruction -Streets and Utilities) and authorize the advertisement for
bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., June 1, 1990.
l+
Agenda Information Memo
May 3, 1990 City Council Meeting
FINAL ACCEPTANCE (MANOR LAKE -STS & UTILS)
I. Contract 88-K, Final Acceptance (Manor Lake - Streets and Utilities) --Installation
of streets and utilities within the Manor Lake Addition was provided privately by the
developer in accordance with plans and specifications submitted under the Development
Contract agreement. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the
Public Works Department and found to be in order for formal acknowledgement of
completion and perpetual maintenance by City forces.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of
Contract 88-K (Manor Lake -Streets & Utilities) and authorize perpetual maintenance by
the City.
� C�
Agenda Information Memo
May 1, 1990, City Council Meeting
APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 (STERNS ADDN - STS & UTILITIES)
J. Contract 89-16, Approve Change Order #1 (Sterns Addition - Streets & Utilities) --
This Change Order provides for additional payment to the contractor for extra costs
incurred due to delays and changed conditions which were beyond the control of the
contractor. This contract consisted of the following separate projects:
Project 541, Country Hollow 2nd Addition - Trunk Utilities
Project 566, Coventry Pass Addition - Trunk Utilities
Project 561, Sterns Addition - Streets & Utilities
The progression of the development of these subdivisions required the City to expedite the
public improvement process. However, the developer did not comply with his required
time frames of major grading activities and/or easement acquisitions in a time frame
necessary to allow the City's contractor to proceed as required under the City's contract.
As such, additional costs were incurred by the contractor who had to suspend construction
operations and change the means and methods of construction until the developers had
satisfactorily complied with their development agreement requirements.
All costs associated with this Change Order will be properly prorated and charged back
to the respective developments and added to their final assessment obligations. The total
amount of this Change Order is $15,895.05 in relationship to the total contract cost of
$518,973.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to
Contract 89-16 (Sterns Addition, etal - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute all related documents.
Agenda Information Meeting
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
COST SHARING AGREEMENT/AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY -STEREO DIGITIZING
K. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF DAKOTA, THE CITY OF EAGAN AND
DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION FOR COST SHARING OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
AND STEREO DIGITIZING -- Enclosed without page number in the Mayor
and Councilmembers' packets is a copy of a proposed agreement
between the City of Eagan, Dakota County and Dakota Electric
Association in which the parties agree to share the cost and
benefit of obtaining aerial photography and stereo digitizing for
the geographical information system (U1tiMap). The City has
budgeted money in 1990 to pay for this service for Sections 19
through 36.
In addition, Dakota Electric Association has approached the City
with a suggestion for cost saving measures for the process as a
whole. Because the contractor will already be in the air, it would
be cost beneficial to all parties if Sections 10 through 18 were
performed at the same time. The cost for these sections to the
City would be approximately $8,000.
Each year, the City of Eagan receives fairly substantial rebates
from Dakota Electric's wholesale power commercial/ industrial rebate
program. Staff is seeking Council approval to propose to Dakota
Electric Association that they allocate a portion of future rebates
toward the financing of Eagan's share necessary to complete
Sections 10 through 18 at this time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Agreement
Between the County of Dakota, the City of Eagan and Dakota Electric
Association for Cost Sharing of Aerial Photography and Stereo
Digitizing and to authorize staff to propose to Dakota Electric
Association that a portion of future power rebates to the City of
Eagan be used to finance Eagan's share of costs for Section 10
through 18.
Agenda Information Meeting
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
CROSSROADS OF EAGAN SOLUTION TO ISSUE
MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
A. Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of Multi -Family Housing Revenue Refunding
Bonds (FHA Insured) Relating to an fisting Multi -Family Housing Development
(Crossroads of Eagan Project - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) Series 1990A and Taxable
Multi -Family- Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Crossroads of Eagan Project - FSA
Insured Mortgage Loan) Series 1990B --The City has received a request from Crossroads
Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership, that the City refinance a multi -family rental
housing development located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection with Denmark
and Duckwood. The City originally financed the project through the issuance of
$1,700,000 of housing development revenue notes, Series 1984. The project consists of
real estate and a 32 unit multi -family rental housing development including related
improvements and equipment.
The owner is proposing that a financing agreement to be dated May 1, 1990 be approved
allowing the City to loan the proceeds of the bonds to the company in order to redeem
in advance of maturity the prior note that a redemption price equal to the outstanding
principal balance accrued interest to the date of redemption. The basic payments will
be made by the company under the FHA insured mortgage loan provided for in the
financing agreement are fixed so as to provide revenue sufficient to pay the principal, both
premium and interest, on the bonds when due. The City would assign its rights, the basic
payments and certain other rights under the financing agreement to First Trust National
Association in St. Paul.
The documents have been reviewed by the City Attorney's office and prior to a final
document was the recommendation of the staff that two (2) conditions be added;
1. 1/8 of 1% City Administration Fee (this is consistent with recent housing issues to
offset any and all City administration costs for the life of the bonds.)
2. Upgrade the property with certain improvements to include landscaping, irrigation
and general building inspection requirements.
A copy of the resolution is enclosed for City Council review on pages through
Agenda Information Meeting
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a resolution
authorizing the issuance of multi -family revenue refunding bonds relating to an existing
multi -family housing development (Crossroads of Eagan Project) series 1990A and taxable
multi -family housing revenue refunding bonds for the Crossroads of Eagan project FHA
insured mortgage loan Series 199013.
a3
CITY OF EAGAN, KINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
XULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
(CROSSROADS OF LAGAN PROJECT - FRA INSURED 19ORTGAGE LOAN)
SERIES 1990A
and
TAXABLE KULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
(CROSSROADS OF EAGAN PROJECT - FHA INSURED XORTGAGE LOAN)
SERIES 1990D
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City
of Eagan, Minnesota (the "City") as follows:
1. The Council has received a request from Crossroads
Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership (the "Company") that
the City undertake to refinance a multifamily rental housing
development as herein described pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462A and 462C, as amended (the "Act"), through issuance by
the City of its Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Crossroads of Eagan Project - FHA Insured Mortgage Loan) Series
1990A in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $1,700,000
(the "Series 1990A Bonds"), and its Taxable Multifamily Housing
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Crossroads of Eagan Project - FHA Insured
Mortgage Loan) Series 1990B (the "Series 1990B Bonds") in an
aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $190,000 (the "Series
1990B Bonds"). The Series 1990A Bonds and the Series 1990B Bonds
are referred to herein collectively as the "Bonds."
2. The City originally financed the Project herein described
through the issuance of its $1,700,000 Housing Development Revenue
Note (Crossroads Partnership Project) Series 1984 (the "Prior
Note").
3. The Company has acquired certain real estate and
constructed thereon a 32 -unit multifamily rental housing
development and related improvements and equipment (hereinafter
referred to as the "Project"). The Project furthers the policies
and purposes of the Act and the findings made in the resolution
adopted by the Council on November 20, 1984, which findings with
respect to the Project are hereby ratified, affirmed and approved.
4. it is proposed that, pursuant to a Financing Agreement
proposed to be dated May 1, 1990, between the City and the Company
(the "Financing Agreement") , the City will loan the proceeds of the
Bonds to the Company in order to redeem in advance of maturity the
Prior Note at a redemption price equal to the outstanding principal
1
2
�
balance thereof plus accrued interest to the date of redemption.
The basic payments to be made by the Company under the FHA -insured
mortgage loan provided for in the Financing Agreement are fixed so
as to produce revenue sufficient (together with revenues derived
from the investment of funds and accounts relating to the Bonds)
to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds
when due. It is further proposed that the City assign its rights
to the basic payments and certain other rights under the Financing
Agreement to First Trust National Association, in St. Paul,
Minnesota (the "Trustee") as security for payment of the Bonds
under an Indenture of Trust proposed to be dated May 1, 1990 (the
"Indenture").
5. Prior to the date of issuance of the Prior Note, the City
approved and submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
CIMHFA") a "financing program" for the Project as required by
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, and MHFA approved the financing
program, and no new or amended financing program need be submitted
to MHFA in connection with the issuance of the Bonds.
6. Forms of the following documents have been submitted to
this Council for approval:
(a) the Financing Agreement;
(b) the Indenture;
(c) an Amended and Restated Regulatory Agreement proposed to
be dated as of May 1, 1990 (the "Regulatory Agreement"),
between the City and the Company;
(d) a Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement")
among the Company, the City and Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood
Incorporated (the "Purchaser"); and
(e) Preliminary Official Statements with respect to the
Bonds.
7. It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
(a) the Project described in the Financing Agreement and
Indenture referred to above constitutes a multifamily
rental housing development authorized by the Act;
(b) the purpose of the Project is and the effect has been to
promote the public welfare by providing additional
decent, safe and sanitary rental housing opportunities
for low and moderate income persons within the City;
(c) the Project is located within the City limits;
2
0�,
(d) the refinancing of the Project, the issuance and sale of
the Bonds, the execution and delivery by the City of the
Financing Agreement, the Purchase Agreement, the
Regulatory Agreement and the Indenture, and the
performance of all covenants and agreements of the City
contained in the Financing Agreement, the Purchase
Agreement, the Regulatory Agreement and the Indenture and
of all other acts and things required under the
constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to make
the Financing Agreement, the Purchase Agreement, the
Regulatory Agreement, Indenture and Bonds valid and
binding obligations of the City in accordance with their
terms, are authorized by the Act;
(e) it is desirable that the Prior Note be redeemed and that
the Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set forth
in the Indenture;
(f) the Purchaser has determined that the basic payments
under the FHA insured mortgage loan provided for in the
Financing Agreement are fixed to produce revenue
sufficient (together with earnings derived from the
investment of funds and accounts held pursuant to the
Indenture and together with cash deposited by the Company
and held by the Trustee) to provide for the prompt
payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest
on the Bonds issued under the Indenture when due, and the
Financing Agreement and Indenture also provide that the
Company is required to pay all expenses of the operation
and maintenance of the Project, including, but without
limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance
against all liability for injury to persons or property
arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and
special assessments levied upon or with respect to the
Project premises and payable during the term of the
Financing Agreement and Indenture;
(g) under the provisions of the Act, and as provided in the
Financing Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not to
be payable from or charged upon any funds other than the
revenue pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not
subject to any liability thereon; no holder of any Bonds
shall ever have the right to compel any exercise by the
City of its taxing powers to pay any of the Bonds or the
interest or premium thereon, or to enforce payment
thereof against any property of the City except the
interests of the City in the Financing Agreement and FHA -
insured mortgage loan which has been assigned to the
Trustee under the Indenture; the Bonds shall not
constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or
equitable upon any property of the City except the
interests of the City in the Financing Agreement and FHA -
3
Wro
insured mortgage loan which has been assigned to the
Trustee under the Indenture; the Bonds shall recite that
the Bonds are issued without obligation on the part of
the state or its political subdivisions, and that the
Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely
from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof; and,
the Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within
the meaning of any constitutional or statutory
limitation.
S. Subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the
provisions of paragraph 12 hereof, the forms of the Financing
Agreement, the Purchase Agreement, the Regulatory Agreement and
the Indenture and exhibits thereto are approved in substantially
the form submitted. The Financing Agreement, Purchase Agreement,
Regulatory Agreement and Indenture, in substantially the form
submitted, are directed to be executed in the name and on behalf
of the City by the Mayor and City Clerk -Treasurer. Copies of all
of the documents necessary to the transaction herein described
shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided herein and in
said Financing Agreement, Purchase Agreement, Regulatory Agreement
and Indenture.
9. The forms of the Preliminary Official Statements are
hereby approved and the City hereby authorizes the use of such
Official Statements in connection with the offer and sale of the
Bonds. The City has not participated in the preparation of the
Official Statements and makes no representations either express or
implied as to the content or adequacy thereof.
10. The City shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds, in
the form and upon the terms set forth in the Indenture and at
interest rates to be determined following marketing of the Bonds,
but in any event not exceeding a net effective rate of 4 per
annum with respect to the Series 1990A Bonds and t per annum
with respect to the Series 1990E Bonds. The maximumaggregate
principal amount of the Bonds shall not exceed $1,884,000 with not
more than $1,700,000 of such amount allocated to the Series 1990A
Bonds (or so much thereof as bond counsel shall be able to opine
as to the tax-exempt status thereof). The offer of the Purchaser
to purchase the Bonds at the price set forth In the Purchase
Agreement, including accrued interest to the date of delivery at
the interest rate or rates to be specified in the Indenture is
hereby accepted. The Mayor and City Clerk -Treasurer are authorized
and directed to prepare and execute the Bonds as prescribed in the
Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee for authentication and
delivery to the Bond Purchaser.
11. The Mayor and City Clerk -Treasurer and other officers of
the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the
Purchaser certified copies of all proceedings and records of the
City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and
4
certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the
legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and
records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known
to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and
affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute
representations of the City as to the truth of all statements
contained therein.
12. The approval hereby given to the various documents
referred to above includes approval of such additional details
therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications
thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto by the City
Attorney and the City officials authorized herein to execute said
documents prior to their execution; said City officials are hereby
authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The
execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers
of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the
approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In
the absence of the officers specifically named herein, any of the
documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be
executed by a person authorized to act in their absence.
13. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage.
Adopted: May , 1990
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk -Treasurer
(SEAL)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
CO=Y OF DAKOTA )
CITY OF EAGAN )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk -
Treasurer of the City of Eagan, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with
the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a
full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of
the City Council of the City of Eagan duly called and held on the
date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the
authorization of the issuance of the Multifamily Housing Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Crossroads of Eagan Project - FHA Insured Mortgage
Loan), Series 1990A and Taxable Multifamily Housing Revenue
Refunding Bonds (Crossroads of Eagan Project - FHA Insured Mortgage
Loan) Series 1990B.
Z24wROsswertifieetion 5
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City of Eagan this
day of May, 1990.
(SEAL)
224\CROSS\Ce,tifie&tion
City Clerk -Treasurer
City of Eagan, Minnesota
Agenda Information Memo
May 3, 1990 City Council Meeting
PRQJ 542, FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
ALDEN POND -STS & UTILSI
B. Project 542, Final Assessment Hearing (Alden Ponds - Streets & Utilities) --On
April 3rd, the City Council received the final assessment roll associated with the above-
referenc d project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on May 1st. Enclosed on
page '0'
is a summary tabulation of the final assessment rates as compared to those
estimated in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on September 5,
1988. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected
property owners informing them of this final assessment public hearing. Several meetings
have been held with the developer, Rosewood Corporation reviewing the final costs
associated with this project. As of this date, the staff has not received any formal
objections to these proposed final assessments. Therefore, it would be appropriate for the
Council to adopt the roll as presented and authorize the certification to the County.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and
approve the final assessment roll for Project 542 (Alden Ponds -Streets & Utilities) and
authorize its certification to Dakota County.
r
3�
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
PROJECT NO:
SUBDIVISION/AREA: ALDEN PONDS
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING: MAY 1, 1990
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AHD/OR ASSESSED:
F.R. = Feasibility Report
FINAL F.R.
WATER RATES RATES
Area
® Laterals S5120.42.1pt� 162_ R+1,t
Service
FlLac. Benefit/
Trunk
Services $4228.36/lot $4779/lot
STORM .
11 Area
SANITARY
Area
® Laterals
Service
Lac. Benefit/
Trunk
STREETS
QGravel Base
® Lateral R54Sn JLJ „ .r WSurfaeing &1957_1Q11nr S��zl2et
CRes. Equiv.
Trailway' $•286.97 $ 478/lot
NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 22
NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 10
FINAL F.R.
RATES RAPES
RATE OF INTEREST: 8%
TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $643,973.12 ($700,200 F.R.)
TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED:
CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 88-34
PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 6. 1988
51
Agenda Information Memo
May 3, 1990 City Council Meeting
PROD 452R, FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
OND AP -50 TRUNK STORM SEWER
C. Project 452R, Final Assessment Hearing (Pond AP -50, Trunk Storm Sewer) --On
April 3rd, the City Council received the final assessment roll associated with the
installation of trunk storm sewer under the above -referenced project and scheduled a
formal public heato be held on May 1st to present and discuss these final costs.
Enclosed on page 3 is a tabulation of the final assessment rates as compared to those
estimated in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on May 3, 1988.
All notices have been published in a legal newspaper and sent to all affected property
owners informing them of this public hearing. As of this date, the staff has not received
any formal objections associated with the final assessments for these public improvements.
Therefore, it would be appropriate for the Council to close the public hearing and
authorize its certification to the County for collection.
AC71ON TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and
approve the final assessment roll for Project 452R (Pond AP -50, Trunk Storm Sewer) and
authorize its certification to Dakota County.
r
3,2--
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
PROJECT NO: 452R
SUBDIVISION%AREA: PONDS AP -50 and AP -49 Outlets
FINAL ASSESSmENT HEARINC: May 1 1990
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AHD/OR ASSESSED:
F.R. = feasibility Rrport
WATER
•❑ Area
MLaterals
[3Service
M Lit. Berefit/
Ir6,nk
FINAL F.R.
RATES RTES
STOP.ri .
�ncta 056/s.f. _05f1c_f_
L7Latera:
NUOIEER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 2
SANITARY
Asea
Laterals
Service
riLat. Benefit/
Trunk
STREETS
-o Cravel Base
Surfacing
Res. Equiv.
NV'!!EF OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15
RATE OF INTEREST: 8%
TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $82,336.41 -(F.R. 78.0091
TOTAL AMOUNT CITY FINANCED: S 9140.13 (F.R. 34,701)
CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWINC CONTRACTS: 88-13
PUBLIC HEARINC DATE: May 3, 1988
-ilo mm
33
FINAL F.R.
RATES RATZS
Agenda Information Memo
May 3, 1990 City Council Meeting
PROI 473, FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
SMI SC OBJECTIONS -PILOT KNOB ROAD TRK STM SEM
D. Project 473, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Pilot Knob
Road Trunk Storm Sewer) --On September 19, 1988, the final assessment hearing was held
for the above -referenced project, At that time, the following property owners submitted
written objections pertaining to the proposed final assessments and were subsequently
removed from the final adopted assessment roll:
Property Owner Legal Description
Tom Rooney
Tony Caponi
Tony Caponi
Theresa & Bernard
Fritz
Mike Kohler
Tom Bergin
#10-02200-012-86
#10-02200-010-80
#10-02200-010-84
#10-02200-014-54
#10-02200-016-54
#10-02200-011-85
Assessment Value of Appraised
Benefit
$ 17,160 $ 20,000
$ 16,552 $ 20,000
$ 16,552 $ 20,000
$ 3,300 $ 3,300
$ 3,300 $ 3,300
$ 3,300 $ 3,300
This particular project provided for the installation of trunk storm sewer facilities from
Berry Patch Park (Mooney Lake) within the Hilltop Addition and within Patrick Eagan
Park. Enclosed on pages 3-5 and 3 (V is a topographic map showing the relationship
of the individual parcels to the specific improvement.
As a result of the objections submitted in September of 1988, the Council directed staff
to proceed with the preparation of a formal appraisal necessary to substantiate the
increase in value of the property associated with this improvement as it relates to the
proposed assessment.
Upon completion of this appraisal, the Public Works Director discussed the reconsideration
of the final assessments with Mr. Bergin and Ms. Fritz and, along with the Assistant City
Attorney, met with Mr. Kohler. Although all parcels will be identified and presented
3 4
collectively, specific discussion on individual parcels may be appropriate if further
objections are presented.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property
owners informing them of this reconsideration of their continued final assessment for this
project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and
approve/modify the final assessments for Project 473 (Miscellaneous Objections -Pilot Knob
Road Trunk Storm Sewer) for those parcels so identified and, if approved, authorize its
certification to Dakota County.
3-S
-Z oil
s 1 \� „--=�'``�\ `�, w, , {� !'I of
�.� '-��: �J'�s"''?.��';\ :•� '� 1 �� ;111
010=61
-:� �,� ;'' Z: ,lz :� •' '�. '�� ��'I �''�.�",�%fir-= �--- �' � �" ��a i';
i � �. __— •1 /�If ,fir
♦ c� r' • 4 /�� \�� uirgE\aa.+\• 1, �� ; P 010-78101
1,
^ �. -- 4�� ��'i - !•� _ �. �i fl� � ,�I��t• � =r.•• 4tcc.".J a":��,��� it i i !^,�� I� �.� '
Stk,
;;\..;:' - ,'�f�rr $�� � •'•�\� � � _ ` •\,•yam`'- / � :,�I �+� t � � �; >
�_ _ �,IL1 /rte. l`�1 I. !' �. � � \ 4 R �J• r I• ''`�'^-'''�I1 f '
ry � �,� _ II' r'I•,'//�•',��`':\�, �`\1 r 1
ATE6
�/ e -%12-85.: '.�:, .'�1 � i'// - � � � 1� i\•.�'_ =: � �.: 1 ,1 + ; i -'' ."ri
.r
'�_ ` I�11.1� • /y 1 1'1�`'� Ir� �f �j � � r // , f 1 �� /+ l rl�i�,
I.•�',—,r y ,., ;� 1r �.. 1, 1, � • + ", ) ,, ; /)! /,/ 1,;;' �, is
� r
` L:G+•• y�`�\ y. r,`"p ! �,, , ��. /. , / �N 1,4:5
,,faw
� ' � EaO
��j = 1 �i s = ; •a". •;Y. I,.'° I;11� ,�1�� 'I. 010-79'
T.i.`. ����',/ ���;` II� ;I�p1I, • \. �', • .r�'t /,.'' f .c �'. ( �/ :S �� :11 ��1 :�t f
_ , P1 ('\`tel--� � � Ali' • �\ �"�� 1E F-�'aS,..' � ♦ ' .� � � i E \.° � �. \\\•
v Ni
00099` \ t - r f d am':.. CJ�`ji'� `'• .1,,._. °`-43
� ---tet � ^\tT� ��c� �/ .��,�' ��„` � ✓ /�j- .-,r �- �`� 1' IO •;��•^- •1 ,
4j ;/ 2-86 1.4'1 ►�'�¢r 010=84'1
� r ,� , !j'� ----�' � / ' 1 � .hid � � � - � P• J1(�f �' ! �� i • � '� %i/- _` �1 i � t
.31
2.
f. •1.'�` _ — - •�'Y'�^'_ __1 _'r v G J _ - t ,
Ff-2E,
3-7
,Agenda Information Memo
May 1, 1990, City Council Meeting
FINAL ASSMT HEARING
(NIISC OBJECTIONS - WESCOTT RD STS & UTILITIES)
E. Project 494, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Wescott Road
Streets & Utilities) --On September 19, 1988, a final assessment hearing was held for the
costs associated with the improvements installed along Wescott Road under the above -
referenced project. As a result of that final assessment hearing, the following property
owners submitted written objections and were removed from the final approved assessment
roll:
Property Owner Legal Description Assessment Value of Appraised
Benefit
Robert Mueller #10-01400-020-82 $181379.93 $30,000.00
Ed Kalal #10-01400-010-82 $28,614.43 $39,400.00
Subsequent to their removal from the final adopted assessment roll, the Council authorized
the preparation, of a formal appraisal to substantiate the increased value of the property
in relationship to the assessments associated with this project. Now that this appraisal
process has been completed and is substantiated, these properties are being presented
again to the City Council for consideration of final adoption of the final assessments.
The Public Works Director and Assistant City Attorney have met with both propem7
owners and explained the appraisals, final assessment amounts and procedure associated
with this final assessment hearing. A11 notices have been published in the legal newspaper
and sent to both property owners informing therm of this final assessment hearing
reconsideration on May 1.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and
approve the final assessment roll for Project 494 (Miscellaneous Objections - Wescott
Road Streets & Utilities) and, if approved, authorize their certification to Dakota County.
�58
Agenda Information Memo
May 1, 1990, City Council Meeting
FINAL ASSMT HEARING
SCELLANEOUS OBJECTIONS - EAGAIN HILL FARMS TRUNK UTILITIES)
F. Project 491, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Eagan Hills Farms
Trunk Utilities) --On September 19, 1988, the final assessment hearing was held for the
public improvements installed under the above -referenced project. At that time, the City
received a written objection from the following property owner:
Property Owner Legal Description Assessment Valle Of Ag isad
Benefit
Myron Hanson # 10-02400-010-78 $11,007.17 $30,000.00
As a result of that written objection, that particular parcel was removed from the final
adopted assessment roll. The staff was directed to prepare a formal appraisal to
substantiate the amount of the assessments in relationship to the increased value of the
property resulting from these improvements. This appraisal has now been completed.
Therefore, this final assessment for this project against this parcel is being brought back
to the City Council for formal reconsideration. The Public Works Director and Assistant
City Attorney have met with the property owner to explain the public improvement and
this special assessment process. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper
and sent to the affected property owner informing him of this final assessment hearing
scheduled for May 1.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and
approve the final assessment for Project 491 (Miscellaneous Objection - Eagan Hill Farm
Trunk Utilities) for the parcel identified and authorize its certification to Dakota County.
Agenda Information Memo
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
(MISCELLANTEOUS OBJECTIONS - COUNTRY HOLLOW TRUNK UTILITIES)
G. Project SOS, Final Assessment Hearing (Miscellaneous Objections - Country Hollow
Trunk LTtilities)--On September 19, 1988, a final assessment hearing was held for the
public improvements installed under the above referenced project. At that time, the
following property owners submitted formal objections and were subsequently removed
from the final approved assessment roll:
Property Owner LeZal Description Assessment Valtie of Apraised
Benefit
George Doeffler #10-02400-010-60 $10,006.99 $101007.00
James Mayer #10-02400-011-59 $ 7,132.82 $ 7,133.00
Lawrence Oldenburg #10-02400-020-60 $10,140.87 $10,105.00
As a result of these written objections, the Council directed staff to have a formal
appraisal prepared to substantiate the amount of the assessment in relationship to the
increased value of the property resulting from the installation of these improvements.
Now that this appraisal process has been completed, these final assessments are being
presented to the City Council for reconsideration. The Director of Public Works and
Assistant City Attorney have met with each of the property owners to explain the
improvements, appraisal and special assessment process. All notices have been published
in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this
final assessment public hearing on May 1.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and
approve the assessments for Project 505 ('Miscellaneous Objections - Country Hollow
Trunk Utilities) for the parcels identified and authorize their certification to Dakota
County.
Agenda Information Memo
May 1, 1490 City Council Meeting
PW-AUSMM
R4 STUDYIARF.A M
A. Reconsideration of Area M for Rezoning Process in R4 Study—Originally, the
reconsideration of Area M of the R-4 study was continued to the May 1 meeting for a
presentation by the property owner and further review by the City Council. The owner,
Hoffman Development Company, informed the City Council that official notification of the
hearing processes previously held were sent to a partner who resides out-of-state and,
unfortunately, was unable to participate in the proceedings. Since that City Council
meeting, the Director of Community Development has received requests from two other
property owners who have requested a special review of their property by the City Council
before the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council hold formal public hearings
on all sixteen tracts identified in the R-4 Study. The Director of Community Development
is recommending that all three (3) parcels be considered at a workshop session during the
month of May prior to formalizing the public hearing process.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue further consideration of
Area M under review as a part of the R-4 Rezoning Study to a workshop allowing a
formal presentation by the property owner.
REZONING{COMP GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR
DIFFLEYICEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
B. Rezoning, Diflley/Cedar PD, Koldt Properties, to Amend the Splashland PD to Allow
Mixed Use Multi -Family Residential and Retail Development and a Comprehensive Guide
Plan Amendment for Specification of Development within an Existing CPD Designation
of Approximately 41 Acres --The Advisory Planning Commission, at the direction of the
City Council, held a public hearing at their March 27 APC meeting to consider the
proposed Diffley/Cedar Planned Development. This item was originally considered by the
Advisory Planning Commission at their January 23, 1990 meeting, continued to the
February meeting and heard by the City Council at their March 6, 1990 meeting.
Originally, the item was to be scheduled at the April 17 meeting but, due to the length
of that agenda, the item was scheduled for the May 1 City Council meeting. The APC's
action at the February 22 meeting was to recommend approval of both the rezoning and
comprehensive guide plan amendments. The action of the APC at their March 27
meeting, after the matter was referred back to the Commission for further review, was to
recommend denial of the two (2) applications as stated.
For additional information on the items, refer to the staff report as prepared by the City
Planner, enclosed on pages�.—through Additional information is enclosed on
Agenda Information Memo
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
pages through which includes a memo from the City Player and the attached
information as referenced.
For a copy of the APC action for the January 23, February 22 and March 27 meetings
are enclosed on pages'U through M.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a rezoning for
the Diffley/Cedar Planned Development by amending the Splashland PD to allow mixed
use multi -family residential and retail and a comprehensive guide plan amendment for
specifications of development within an existing CPD designation of aproximately 41 acres.
�Z
MEMO TO: GARY GRAPES, CHAIRMAN
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER
DATE: MARCH 22, 1990
RE: DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
On March 6, the City Council reviewed the proposed Diffley/Cedar
Planned Development and after a lengthy presentation and Council
discussion, this item was referred back to the Advisory Planning
Commission prior to any action taking place. The applicants were
directed to review their plans and make modifications where
possible based on the following:
I. Public safety and traffic concerns relating both to the
proposed development and the adjacent elementary school.
2. Possibility of increasing school facilities which would add
to the burden already existing on Eagan taxpayers.
3. The appropriateness of the proposed zoning R-4 since there is
such little leeway on the upper limit of the zone for any
flexibility or later modification.
4. Conflict with Enron and cable sites and landscaping adjacent
to the site and the sites themselves.
5. Fewer units per acre would be more appropriate based on the
location, topography: existing number of multiple units in
the City and overall City planning.
If modifications can be made, they will be presented to the
Commission next Tuesday. This item has been scheduled for the
April 17 City Council meeting. If anyone would like further
information on this item, please feel free to contact me.
MEMO TO: GARY GRAVES, CHAIRMAN
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER
DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1990
RE: DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
At the January 23 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, this iter
was continued at the applicant's request prior to action by the
Commission so they could review the concerns expressed that night
and to see if possible modifications to the site plan could be
made.
Since that time, the following changes have occurred:
The retail square footage has been reduced from 73,000
sq. ft. to 41,000 sq. ft. which includes a 28,000 sq. ft.
retail center and two free-standing pads containing 5,000
and 8,000 sq. ft., respectively.
For comparison purposes, the Eagan Convenience Center along
Duckwood Drive containing the Dairy Queen is approximately 18,000
sq. ft. and Thomas Lake Center consists of approximately 43,000 sq.
ft. in the retail building alone (not including any free-standing
pads.)
The total number of residential units has been lowered by 17% from
494 to 412. The previous proposal had two 140 unit apartment
clusters. The revised plan has one 108 unit apartment grouping.
The overall density has been reduced from 15.8 units/acre to 11.9
units/acre. The Commission also requested further review of the
relocation of the Cable TV/North Central facility. The applicants
have stated their desire to accomplish this and another exhibit has
been attached showing how the site would ultimately be designed if
the relocation took place. The original staff report has been
attached and all conditions still apply.
Citf Planner
JS/js
44
_
F-�
U-
C) u
LU
U
L
,
I:
V
€"M. I;
jk-
:. �• � -., 1 moi. s� � r
,
I:
V
€"M. I;
jk-
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT,
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (REZONING)
DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
APPLICANT: ROLDT PROPERTIES
LOCATION: SW 1/4 OF SECTION 19
EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)
DATE OF PUBLIC BEARING: JANUARY 23, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 17, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted
requesting a Comprebensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Rezoning of
the existing Splashland Planned Development to allow a mixed use
multi -family and retail development on approximately 41 acres along
the north side of Diffley Road and west of Cedar Avenue. The
City's Land Use Plan designates this area as CPD (Commercial
Planned Development).
BACKGROUND: This area was rezoned in 1982 from GB (General
Business) to the Bluffview Planned Development consisting of 17
acres, allowing a motel/hotel, offices, and other GB uses.
However, nothing was constructed and -in 1985 the area was increased
to approximately 33 acres and the Splashland Planned Development
and Preliminary Plat were approved. Splashland would have been a
water theme park, but the Final Plat was never completed. The
current applicants wanted to include the Cable TV North Central
site, but over the past months they have been unable to reach an
agreement on the terms and the relocation of the existing facility.
The intent was to move the studios into the proposed retail center
and remodel the building for clubhouse purposes. The applicants
would still like to acquire the site in the future if negotiations
can be worked out. This revised site plan has reduced the retail
component from 100,000 sq. ft. to 73,500 sq. ft., including a
55,000 sq. ft. retail center with three free-standing pads
consisting of 7,500, 6,500, and 4,500 sq. ft. building pads.
There are three building styles proposed in the residential area,
instead of the two originally shown. They include: a townhouse
style unit, smaller three story type apartment building with
private entrances, and the typical elevator type apartment
building. The applicant feels that a mixed use, multi -family and
neighborhood commercial development is an appropriate use of the
site because it can be developed as an identifiable community with
strong physical boundaries. The commercial development along
Diffley Road will reinforce its image as a commercial street and
the residential development will take advantage of the views
towards the Minnesota River.
a�
r
w
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is highly visible as one enters
Eagan from the north. The applicant is proposing to take advantage
of the panoramic views towards the Minnesota River where the
vertical distance between this site and the river is over 100 ft.
The land is open grassland, falling gradually towards the northeast
property lines where it then falls dramatically. Adjacent land
uses are: the Superamerica store to the west, E -Z Mini -storage to
the north, Cedar Avenue to the east, and Metcalf Jr. High School
to the south. Enron Gas Company is also along the northeast corner
of this site.
ENRON GAS COMPANY: Enron's major concern was having direct access
to their facility, as well as the buried gas lines on the site.
Enron, Minnegasco, NSP, and Peoples Natural Gas are users of this
facility. This facility is NSP's main feeder to St. Paul and
Minnegasco's to the north. The facility is a point of exchange
where gas supplied by Enron is distributed into local utility
pipelines. Gas pressure is also reduced from the trunk lines to
the local lines. Enron typically generates two to three trips to
the site a week, along with monthly inspections of the utility
easements. Service -type vehicles are smaller trucks and pickups;
big vehicles are only needed in the event of an emergency or
necessary major repair. If there was a gas leak, there would be
little or no chance of an explosion since gas is lighter than air
and it would naturally dissipate. The Moundsview pipeline fire a
couple of years ago was a gasoline fire.
PROJECT SCOPE: The site plan shows 31.1 acres of housing with
following breakdown:
2 140 unit apartment courts 280 units
2 90,000 & 60,000 unit clusters 156 units
of smaller style apartments
48 unit rental townhouses 48 units
Total Units: 484 units
This adds up to 15.6 units per gross acre. The retail area with
a total building square footage of 73,500 sq. ft. on ten acres has
a gross lot coverage under 17%. Limited Business and Neighborhood
Business zoning districts allow 20% coverage, with other districts
either 30 or 35%. The applicant feels that the approximately
4,000,000 sq. ft. Mall Of America in Bloomington will be a major
contributor to the development of this site since it will employ
approximately 5,000 people.
The residential component will consist of three housing types: an
eight unit townhouse style building with attached garages, a
rowhouse style building with individual entries and underground
parking, and a three story apartment building with elevators and
heated underground parking. In addition, a 5,000 sq. ft. clubhouse
will be constructed at the entry to the residential development.
The clubhouse will be the visual focal point for the development.
It will feature steeply pitched roofs, tall interior volumes, and
expansive windows to take advantage of views to the west and north.
It will house the management and leasing offices, party room,
recreational amenities, and outdoor swimming pool overlooking the
river valley.
The eight unit townhouse style buildings with attached garages will
feature stepped roof massing ranging from one story over the end
garages to three stories at the center., Each unit will have on -
grade entries and each building will have one and two story
dwelling units ranging in size from 1,030 sq. ft. to 1,350 sq. ft.
The three story rowhouse building is unique to the Minneapolis -St.
Paul market. It offers the identity and feel of townhouse
buildings by having individual on -grade entries for each unit. A
primary benefit of this plan is the development of courtyards that
will feature entry doors and bay windows and that will express the
smaller scale of individual units. The underground parking will
accommodate 1-1/2 cars per dwelling unit, which will allow more
landscaping in the entry courts.
The elevator apartment homes with underground parking are grouped
in two neighborhoods, one at the north end of the site with views
over the river valley, and one at the southeast edge of the site
visible from the main entrance. The shape of these buildings
maximize views and encloses landscaped courtyards. Unit sizes will
range from studios, 815 sq. ft. one bedrooms, to 1,200 sq. ft. two
bedroom units.
The architectural treatment will emphasize traditional elements
including steep pitched roofs, bay windows, covered balconies, and
enclosed screen porches.. The townhouse style buildings will be
massed and detailed as a large country house with prominent
chimneys. The rowhouse building will feature articulated entries
and facades, and the elevator apartment homes will emphasize a
contemporary architecture, and will develop a strong end profile
of paired chimneys visible from the valley and Cedar Avenue bridge.
The primary exterior materials will be brick, stucco and horizontal
lap siding.
PROJECT TEAM: Pfister Architects of Minneapolis are the project
designers. They were the architects for the Thomas Lake Pointe
apartments along Thomas Lake Road. They also did the design work
for the Residences at Edinborough in Brooklyn Park, the Bristol
Apartments in Bloomington and the exterior of the Timberwolves
arena presently under construction in Minneapolis. The developer,
E.J. Plesko & Associates/Koldt Properties of St. Louis Park had
developed major projects throughout the country and locally have
completed a 227 -unit Radisson/Ridgedale Hotel in Minnetonka, Market
Plaza Retail Center and Tower in Richfield consisting of a 166 -unit
highrise located at West 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue and
Parkshore Place, a 13 -story 207 -unit, senior care center near
Byerly's off Highway 100 in St. Louis Park.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: Although no grading, drainage
and erosion control plan was submitted at this time with this
application, the development in concept proposes a single area
which may potentially store storm water runoff. The existing
drainage over the proposed development is generally northeasterly
toward Cedar Avenue. The City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan
shows this area tributary to Pond AP -6. Pond AP -6 is a designated
ponding area in the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Pond
AP -6 is located north of the E -Z Mini Storage Facility and
southerly of the Cedar Avenue/T.H. 13 interchange.
An area of increasing sensitivity for the City is the impact of
development on downstream waterbodies receiving site generated
storm water runoff. No water quality analysis was performed at
this point but the development will be subject to a detailed
analysis and subsequent requirements when the development reaches
the platting stages of development.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity
to provide service to the proposed development is readily available
along the westerly side of the property. No sanitary sewer trunk
improvements are required as a result of the proposed development.
A 12" trunk water main service has been provided to the proposed
development in two locations. With the construction of the Cedar
Avenue Freeway, a 12" trunk water main was stubbed to the
development's northeasterly corner. A 12" trunk water main also
exists along the westerly and northwesterly boundaries of the
property beginning at Diffley Road and extending northerly and
northeasterly. The City's Water Supply & Distribution Plan
identifies the need for the connection of the existing 12" trunk
water main stubbed to the easterly property line during the
construction of the Cedar Avenue Freeway and connecting this 12"
stub to the existing 12" line at the corner of Diff ley Road and Old
Highway 13. This 12" trunk water main connection connects the
City's intermediate pressure zone with the low pressure zone. The
connection of the two different pressure zones will require the
installation of a pressure reducing station. The installation of
the pressure reducing station is a responsibility of the City's
Water Supply Trunk Fund as is the oversizing costs associated with
the 12" trunk water main required through this site.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Street widths, easement requirements
and right-of-way widths will be addressed in detail as a part of
the final platting of the proposed development.
*A ;L9
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO BOX 21199, EAGAN, MN 55121
612 454.8100
N E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: CITY PLANNER STURM /�
FROM: CABLE COORDINATOR REARDON 114 /'yj,
DATE: JANUARY 18, 1990 �`
SUBJECT: DIFFLEY/CEDAR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT RE: CABLE TV
As per our recent conversation, I understand the portion of this
proposed development that included the Cable TV North Central site,
has been removed from the proposal. This information was relayed
to the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission at their January 11th
meeting.
There was one concern was raised at the meeting. The Commission
asked that any construction, that may take place on the proposed
site, be subject to review as to the impact it may have on the
operations of Cable TV North Central's system. Specifically, there
is a concern that the sight lines for the satellite dishes and
tower be not obstructed or so that any structure not interfere with
the reception of signals.
When and at such time the concept for the proposal be approved, I
ask that a condition be included, as and when you determine
appropriate, for an analysis of signal interruption/interference.
If you have any further questions regarding this item, or if I or
the Cable Commission can be of any further assistance regarding the
proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me.
51
DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
1. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a
five year period.
2. A phasing plan shall be submitted with the Preliminary Plat
of the 1st Addition.
3. An overall landscape plan shall be prepared.
4. An overall sign agreement shall be entered into.
5. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened.
6. An overall design theme shall be carried out in the
residential area.
7. All commercial areas shall be constructed with the same
materials with all sides of the buildings being constructed
of the same material.
8. All trash/recycling areas shall be contained within the
buildings.
9. All applicable environmental permits shall be obtained.
10. The development is subject to additional requirements as
identified by City staff during the platting phases of
development necessary to provide adequate public
infrastructure facilities to service the development.
oil
ll �� ■ ■ R
t
,
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DALE RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER
DATE: APRIL 27, 1990
RE: DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
The following is a chronology of the proposed Diffley/Cedar Planned Development located
on 41 acres in the northwest corner of the intersection of Cedar Avenue and Diffley Road.
This site includes the existing 33 acre Splashland Planned Development and 11 acres of
existing Light Industrial zoned property. This area was rezoned in 1982 from GB (General
Business) to the Bluffview Planned Development consisting of 17 acres, allowing a
hotel/motel, offices, and other GB uses. However, nothing was constructed and in 1985,
the area was increased to approximately 33 acres and the Splashland Planned
Development and Preliminary Plat were approved. Splashland would have been a water
theme park, but the Final Plat was never completed.
In January 1990, a public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission with the
applicant requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Planned
Development Amendment to allow a mixed-use P.D. consisting of 73,500 sq. ft. of retail
space (including three small pad locations) and 484 multi -family housing units. Three
housing building styles were proposed ... the typical three story type building, a rowhouse
style with underground parking, and townhouse scale units. They had 280, 156, and 48
units, respectively.
The gross density was 15.06 units per acre and the retail lot coverage was 17%. Limited
Business and Neighborhood Business districts allow 20% coverage, with other commercial
districts either 30-35%. There was no one from the public at that meeting. After a lengthy
discussion, there was strong direction given to the applicant to lower the density and
square footage of the retail space and the item was unanimously continued until the
February meeting so the applicant could take into consideration the concerns expressed
by the Commission.
In February, the Commission reviewed revised plans that reduced the retail square footage
from 73,500 to 41,000 sq. ft. which included two free-standing pads and a 28,000 sq. ft.
retail center. For comparison purposes, the Thomas Lake Center is 43,000 sq. ft. The
residential units were lowered by 17% to 412, with more emphasis on smaller scale
6�
buildings. Only one typical three-story apartment building was proposed. The total
density was lowered to 11.09 units per acre on the line between the Comprehensive Guide
Plan designation of D -III (6-12 units per acre) and D -IV (12+ units). The item was
approved unanimously. At the March 6 City Council meeting, the item was referred back
to the Advisory Planning Commission based upon the following:
1. Public safety and traffic concerns relating both to the proposed development and
adjacent elementary school.
2. Possibility of increasing school facilities which would add to the burden already
existing on Eagan taxpayers.
3. The appropriateness of the proposed zoning R-4 since there is such little leeway on
the upper limit of the zone for any flexibility or later modification.
4. Conflict with Enron and Cable sites and landscaping adjacent to the site and the sites
themselves.
5. Fewer units per acre would be more appropriate based on the location,
topography... existing number of multiple units in the City and overall City planning.
At the March 27 APC meeting, the applicants again presented their plan to the
Commission. No changes were proposed by the applicant since they felt they previously
reduced the project as much as they possibly could, and they now had a more desirable
housing mix. The discussion revolved around the Council concerns. There was a motion
to reaffirm the February meeting vote to approve the proposal, however that motion failed
with a 2/5 vote. Two Commission members who voted against the motion were not
present at the February APC meeting. Since that time, the applicants have been working
to address issues raised by the City Council dealing with the impact on City systems
including the fire department, police department, traffic along Diffley Road, and the
Burnsville School district. It appears that City services are not negatively impacted by the
proposed development, however the police information shows there are more calls to
rental housing than owner -occupied units.
Attached are copies of the correspondence, as well as a breakdown of vacancy rates in
rental housing provided by the Dakota County HRA and a listing of all rezonings from
R -4s to other districts in Eagan since January 1987. Four hundred ten acres have been
changed to date. , and Maxeh -412C minutark for.
If you would like additional information, please advise.
JS/js
Attach.
S(o
REVISED PLAN
FEBRUARY 1990
1 •r
fill
+ ' _ h .I ,
O
T
4
:I
o■
Y `
:I
o■
3?95 Pi!ot Knob Roac
Eagan, Minnesota 55122.138
Phone (614` 454-5474
fire department
TO: Jim Sturm, City Planner
FROM: Ken Southorn, Fire Chief
DATE: April 16, 1990
RE: DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
THOMAS EGAN
Mayor
DAVID K G'JSTAFSON
PAMELA ;;CRE-
Tim,
;CRehTIM PAVI'LE ,TY
THEODORE VV AC�-TEP
Counc-- Me—^>e•s
THOMAS HEDGES
CGt. Ac" ,,^s^a'z,
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City C.erk
In reference to your inquiry on the impact this proposal will have upon fire protection
services in the City, I can offer the following comments:
• From the information you have supplied, I do not detect any unique hazards in
the proposal.
• My main concern with this, or any other large complex, is to have access to two
or three sides of each structure to facilitate fire suppression or rescue operations.
• Adequate street widths and driveways are needed to allow fire apparatus to
maneuver.
• Historically, multiple housing units have created additional calls resulting from
unfounded alarms.
• The Fire Department would appreciate the opportunity to review plans of the
project as it progresses.
This proposal does not appear to pose any unusual conditions for fire services if adequate
access if provided.
KRS/tp
MSturm.KRS
THE LONE OAK TREE.. ,THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
KEN SOUTHORN
Che,
DICK SCHINDELDECKER
Ass,sta^". Cn,e`
DAVE DI IOTA
of czagan
pmt, -C. Chef
TO: Jim Sturm, City Planner
FROM: Ken Southorn, Fire Chief
DATE: April 16, 1990
RE: DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
THOMAS EGAN
Mayor
DAVID K G'JSTAFSON
PAMELA ;;CRE-
Tim,
;CRehTIM PAVI'LE ,TY
THEODORE VV AC�-TEP
Counc-- Me—^>e•s
THOMAS HEDGES
CGt. Ac" ,,^s^a'z,
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City C.erk
In reference to your inquiry on the impact this proposal will have upon fire protection
services in the City, I can offer the following comments:
• From the information you have supplied, I do not detect any unique hazards in
the proposal.
• My main concern with this, or any other large complex, is to have access to two
or three sides of each structure to facilitate fire suppression or rescue operations.
• Adequate street widths and driveways are needed to allow fire apparatus to
maneuver.
• Historically, multiple housing units have created additional calls resulting from
unfounded alarms.
• The Fire Department would appreciate the opportunity to review plans of the
project as it progresses.
This proposal does not appear to pose any unusual conditions for fire services if adequate
access if provided.
KRS/tp
MSturm.KRS
THE LONE OAK TREE.. ,THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
CRIME SUMMARY FOR 1989
BY LOCATION
ASSAULT
TOTAL REPORTED FOR 1989 311
BY LOCATION OCCURRED:
RENTAL RESIDENCE 151 OR 49%
NON -RENTAL RESIDENCE 103 OR 33%
OTHER 57 OR 18%
CRIME AGAINST FAMILY
TOTAL REPORTED FOR 1989 135
BY LOCATION OCCURRED:
RENTAL RESIDENCE 63 OR 47%
NON -RENTAL RESIDENCE 68 OR 50%
OTHER 4 OR 3%
CRIMINAL SEXUAL CONDUCT
TOTAL REPORTED FOR 1989 45
BY LOCATION OCCURRED:
RENTAL RESIDENCE 15 OR 33%
NON -RENTAL RESIDENCE 24 OR 53%
OTHER 6 OR 13%
*OTHER -INCLUDES BUSINESSES, PARKS, STREETS, AND ALL PUBLIC AREAS.
EAGAN POLICE REPORT
AS OF 11/1/89 THERE ARE 17,900 DWELLING UNITS IN THE CITY OF EAGAN.
(STATISTIC FROM KRISTY MARNIN, CITY OF EAGAN/PLANNING DEPT.)
TOTAL NUMBER OF RENTAL UNITS IN CITY OF EAGAN ARE 5,021.
(FROM RENTAL LISTING 1/1/89, CITY OF EAGAN.)
BASED ON ABOVE TWO FIGURES, RENTALS ACCOUNT FOR 28% OF CITY OF
EAGAN'S DWELLING UNITS.
TOTAL NUMBER OF RENTAL DWELLINGS
TOTAL NUMBER OF NON -RENTAL DWELLINGS
TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLINGS:
(cc)
5,021
12,879
1/, 7VV
OR 28%
OR 72%
THOMAS LAKE POINTE POLICE CALLS
�. SPR 17, 1990, 1:15 PH SINCE 1987 PAGE 1
CASE-NBR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TIME -RECEIVED
CALL -CODE CALL-CODE-DESCR
CALL -LOCATION
90/03/30
19:47:08
9860
SUSP ACTIVITY
1510
THOMAS
LAKE
PT #102
90/03/30
19:47:50
9860
SUSP ACTIVITY
1510
THOMAS
LAKE
PT 0102
90/03/30
20:07:00
9310
FOUND CAT
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
90/04/01
20:02:20
9800
MISCELLANEAOUS
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT 4113
90/04/05
00:32:34
9100
PARK
1510
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR 8DO025467
87/12/30
13:15:00
9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
THOMAS LAKE
APT
CR8700003844
87/03/01
12:27:00
9916
SECURITY CHECKS
THOMAS LAKE
PT
CR87DODD6592
87/04/12
17:55:00
P3310
TRESPASS -MS -PRI
THOMAS LAKE
APTS
CR8700009470
87/05/23
09:40:00
P3139
PROP DAMAGE -MS-
THOMAS LAKE
APTS
CR8700012660
87/07/01
06:26:00
9991
CITY ORD VIO-0TH
THOMAS LAKE
APTS
CR8700012724
87/07/01
21:49:00
9600
FIRE
THOMAS LAKE
APARTMENTS
CR8700014777
87/07/27
17:56:00
T4159
THEFT -$250 LESS
THOMAS LAKE
PT APARTMENTS
CR9700017397
87/09/01
12:30:00
W3190
DISTURB PEACE -M
1510
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8700020391
67/10/16
15:40:00
T4029
THEFT -$250 LESS
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT RD
CR8700020784
67/10/22
18:29:00
9600
FIRE -MULTIPLE DW
1510
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8700022969
87/11/24
06:50:00
T2099
THEFT -$2514250
THOMAS LAKE
POINT APT
CR88000DD526
88/01/09
23:49:00
9800
911 MISDIALS
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRBBODD02386
88/02/07
14:51:00
9720
MEDICALS
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
P1 RD
CRBB00002428
88/02/08
13:00:00
9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT _
CRBBODO03868
88/03/04
06:22:00
9800
MISCELLANEOUS
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8800004899
88/03;21
04:18:00
N3070
DISTURB PEACE -M
THOMAS LAKE
POINTE APT
CRBSD0006096
88/04/08
07:50:00
9035
SCHOOL BUS VIOLA
THOMAS LAKE
RD 9
THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8800006162
88/04/09
00:57:00
9801
DOMESTICS
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRBBCD006684
88/04/16
18:59:00
9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT RD
CRBBO0007345
88/04/26
17:25:00
N3190
DISTURB PEACE -M
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRBBODO07422
88/04/27
22:08:00
9830
GUN PURCHASE -TRA
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8800007636
88/04/30
21:45:00
9011
SPEEDING
THOMAS LAKE
PT
CR8800008094
68/05/06
22:37:00
A9501
TERROR-THRT INF
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRSSODO08169
BB/05/07
19:35:00
A9501
TERROR-THRT INF
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8800009002
88/05/18
23:50:00
N3070
DISTURB PEACE -M
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8800009160
88/05/20
20:48:00
9720
MEDICALS
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRBBOOO10478
88/06/06
16:45:00
V4110
THEFT -PARTS FRO
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8800010543
88/06/07
14:06:00
9934
ASSIST OTHER DEP
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8800010831
88/06/11
20:20:00
9520
HOME ACCIDENTS -P
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRBB00011276
68/06/18
01:28:00
M3070
DISTURB PEACE -M
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8800011730
88/06/24
19:03:00
9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRBBDOO12174
88/06/30
23:08:00
9860
$USP PERSON
THOMAS LAKE
APT
CR8800012176
88/05/30
23:21:00
M4199
LIGUOR - OTHER
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRSSD0013333
88/07/16
01:30:00
9720
MEDICALS
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRBSDDO13809
88/07/22
23:24:00
U3070
DISTURB PEACE -M
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT RD
CRBSODO13820
88/07/23
02:55:00
N3070
DISTURB PEACE -M
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
POINT RD
CR8800014418
88/07/31
16:53:00
A9500
TERROR-THRT INF
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRBBOOO15088
88/08/10
20:15:00
9835
CIVIL MATTERS
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8800015571
88/08/18
20:03:00
T2029
THEFT -5251-52500
1510
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRBBODO15706
88/08/21
01:14:00
N3070
DISTURB PEACE -M
1500
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRB800015714
88/08/21
02:04:00
M3070
DISTURB PEACE -M
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRBB00016443
BB/09/01
12:41:00
9520
NOME ACCIDENTS
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8800016602
86/09/03
20:04:00
9603
PUBLIC ASSIST
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT RD
CRBBOOO17223
88/09/13
22:51:00
9934
ASSIST OTHER DEP
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
POINT RD
CRBBODO17584
88/09/18
22:51:00
9660
SUSP PERSON
THOMAS LAKE
APT
CR8800018255
88/09/29
18:42:00
9720
MEDICALS
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT RD
CRBBDO018376
68/10/01
13:15:00
9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT RD
CRBBOOO18941
88/10/10
19:42:00
9020
CARELESS/EXHIBIT
THOMAS LAKE
i THOMAS LAKE PT
CRBBOOO19309
88/10/16
14:59:00
9860
$USP PERSON
WOODS NR THOMAS LAKE APT
CR8800020617
88/11/08
11:16:00
9011
SPEEDING
THOMAS LAKE
RD 9
THOMAS LAKE PT
CR8800020729
88/11/10
15:07:00
A5355
ASLT 5 -INFLICTS
1530
c\
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
TUE, APR 17, 1990, 1:15 PM
1
CASE-NBR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TIME -RECEIVED CALL -CODE CALL-CODE-DESCR
CALL -LOCATION
CR8800020760
88/11/11 02:50:00 9070
EQUIPMENT VIOLAT THOMAS LAKE
PT
CRUND21276
88/11/19 23:23:00 N3190
DISTURB PEACE -M
1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CISM22082
88/12/04 08:00:00 9991
JUNK ORD VIOLATI
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
0118800022821
88/12/17 16:58:00 9105
HANDICAPPED PARK 1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8800023278
88/12/26 20:35:00 9000
ROAD AND DRIVING 1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
COMM023304
88/12/27 02:12:00 9700
SUICIDE -THREATEN
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
C18900000779
89/01/14 08:37:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8904000786
89/01/14 15:13:00 9835
CIVIL MATTERS
1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8900001224
89/01/21 18:19:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CRBMD02085
89/02/06 19:15:00 9600
FIRE
1510 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900002488
89/02/13 18:54:00 9520
HOME ACCIDENTS
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
C28900003241
89/02/24 22:03:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
C289000D3326
89/02/26 10:36:00 9301
LOST PERSON
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8900003459
89/03/01 DD:20:00 9830
GUN PURCHASE -TRA
1510 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR89D0003932
89/03/09 12:34:00 P3119
PROP DAMAGE -MS-
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900004023
89/03/10 19:30:00 C1211
FORGERY-FE-UTT
1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900004110
89/03/12 02:08:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900004323
89/03/15 16:44:00 N3190
DISTURB PEACE -M
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
214
CR8900004452
89/03/17 12:39:00 9870
INTELLIGENCE -PUB
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900006531
89/04/20 12:27:00 T4159
7HEFT-5250 LESS
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PTNTS
CRMD006548
89/04/20 16:39:00 74159
THEFT -5250 LESS
1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8900006900
89/04/26 04:11:00 9960
SUSPICIOUS ACTIV
THOMAS LAKE
PT &
THOMAS LAKE DR
CR8900007861
89/05/11 23:34:00 9870
INTELLIGENCE -PUB
THOMAS LAKE
APT
CR8900008987
89/05/29 03:49:00 9860
SUSPICIOUS ACTIV
1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR89000D9396
89/06/03 13:16:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8900009550
89/06/05 16:31:00 T2159
THEFT -5251-5250
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR89D0009814
89/06/09 17:33:00 9990
ANIMAL ORDINANCE
THOMAS LAKE
PT RD
CR8900011521
89/07/02 03:34:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900011938
89/07/07 11:40:00 T2159
THEFT -!2514250
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900012218
89/07/11 00:22:00 9860
SUSPICIOUS ACTIV
1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8900012320
89/07/12 16:46:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8900012849
89/07/19 14:45:00 9453
ACCIDENT -PD -HIT
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8900013325
89/07/26 00:24:00 9870
INTELLIGENCE -PUB
THOMAS LAKE
PT
CR8900013623
89/07/29 12:56:00 9720
MEDICALS
1510 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8900014121
89/08/05 08:59:00 P3119
PROP DAMAGE -MS-
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8900014146
89/08/05 16:08:DO 9801
DOMESTICS
1520TROMAS LAKE PT RD
CR8900014663
89/08/12 10:22:00 9310
FOUND
1510 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900014673
89/08/12 13:05:00 9934
ASSIST OTHER DEP
1510 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8900014857
89/08/15 14:47:00 A9505
TERROR-THRT INF
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900015261
89/08/20 19:32:00 P3310
TRESPASS -MS -PRI
1510 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900015539
89/08/23 20:28:00 U3496
THEFT-MS-BICYCL
THOMAS LAKE
APT
CR8900015883
89/08/27 21:42:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900015894
89/08/28 01:11:00 9800
MISCELLANEOUS
1510 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900015953
89/08/28 19:37:00 9720
MEDICALS
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR89DO016820
89/09/08 22:40:00 9000
ROAD AND DRIVING
THOMAS LAKE
PT
CR8900017117
89/09/13 10:02:00 9105
HANDICAPPED PARK
THOMAS LAKE
APTS
CR8900017314
89/09/16 02:11:00 N3070
DISTURB PEACE -M
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900018175
89/09/28 19:30:00 9870
INTELLIGENCE -PUB
THOMAS LAKE
PT
CR8900018232
89/09/29 17:26:00 9600
FIRE
1530 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900018333
89/09/30 23:04:00 A5554
ASLT 5-THRT BOD
1520 THOMAS
LAKE PT
RD
CR8900018781
89/10/08 05:59:D0 9800
MISCELLANEOUS
THOMAS LAKE
PT APT
CR8900019972
89/10/26 02:29:00 A1155
ASLT 1 -GREAT BO
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900020327
89/10/31 01:01:00 P3310
TRESPASS -MS -PRI
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900020360
89/10/31 13:53:00 9934
ASSIST OTHER DEP
1520 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900020614
89/11/03 22:06:00 9700
SUICIDE -ATTEMPT/
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900021391
89/11/15 22:35:00 A5352
ASLT 5 -INFLICTS
1540 THOMAS
LAKE
PT
PAGE 2
APR 17, 1990, 1:15 PM
PAGE 3
CASE-NBR
TIME -RECEIVED CALL -CODE CALL-CODE-DESCR
CALL -LOCATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CR8900021429
89/11/16
12 -42 -bb 9444
ACCIDENT-PROPERT
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900021478
89/11/17
00:08:00 9601
DOMESTICS
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900021945
89/11/24
MOM 9000
ROAD AND DRIVING
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900022337
89/12/01
23:19:00 9934
ASSIST OTHER DEP
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR8900022767
89/12/09
14:30:00 9453
ACCIDENT -PD -HIT
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CRBM022821
89/12/10
04:47:00 9818
ALARMS
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900022995
89/12/13
14:19:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900023319
89/12/18
09:20:00 9803
PUBLIC ASSIST
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900023345
89/12/18
17:59:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900023365
89/12/18
22:41:DO 9700
SUICIDE -ATTEMPT/
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR890D023492
89/12/21
02:46:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR8900023645
89/12/22
22:52:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR9000000181
90/01/04
09:46:00 P3119
PROP DAMAGE -MS-
1500
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR9000000455
90/01/08
15:06:60 U3026
THEFT -MS -ISSUE
1510
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR9000001854
90/01/29
08:25:00 9800
MISCELLANEOUS
1530
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR9000001943
90/01/31
09:56:00 0190
DISTURB PEACE -M
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR9000002249
90/02/04
20:36:60 9720
MEDICALS
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR9000002752
90/02/12
19:27:00 9000
ROAD AND DRIVING
THOMAS LAKE
RD b
THOMAS LAKE PT
CR9000002804
90/02/13
19:01:00 9000
ROAD AND DRIVING
THOMAS LAKE
RD b
THOMA,J LAKE PT
CR9000002906
90/02/15
15:06:00 9801
DOMESTICS
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR9000002939
90/02/16
06:37:00 9800
MISCELLANEOUS
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR9000003907
90/03/03
11:33:00 9444
ACCIDENT-PROPERT
1540
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR9000004163
90/03/07
18:01:00 9800
MISCELLANEOUS
1510
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
CR9000004440
90/03/11
15:52:00 T2159
THEFT -52514250
1520
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
RD
CR9000005785
90/04/14
23:00:27 N
MUSIC
151D
THOMAS
LAKE
PT
0205
1370 f[" r4
.• .L
(0 3
BURNSVILLE• EAGAN• SAVAGE
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 9 1
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CENTER
April 17, 1990
Michael Gould
Koldt Properties
Suite 1311
3663 Park Ctr. Blvd.
St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416
Dear Mr. Gould,
APR 23 1990
We have reviewed your proposal to construct 444 residential housing
units on a site near Metcalf Junior High. We estimate .25 students
per unit for a total of 111 students. This number can be accommodated
within Independent School District 191 facilities and will not place a
strain on school buildings in the immediate vicinity.
The plans submitted earlier suggest that this development will be
served primarily by culdesacs. Please keep in mind that students
would be required to walk to a bus stop located on a through street as
it is our policy not to enter culdesacs with school buses. We would
also call your attention to the need for traffic lights for students
attending Metcalf Junior High. We are concerned about traffic con-
jestion on Diffley Road resulting from increased traffic flow and the
creation of a major intersection immediately across from the entrance
to Metcalf Junior High. Commercial development along Diffley Road
would exacerbate the traffic problem and might also create an
uncontrollable urge for students to congregate at the stores at par-
ticular times during the day. The safety of students crossing Diffley
Road needs to be addressed.
Thank you for your cooperation.
erely,
era a AckermanTi "
Acting Superintendent
GA/ak
cc: Tom Hedges, City of Eagan
Rudy DeLuca, Principal
`1J
100 RII-ER RIDGE COURT • BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 • (612)86'•7300
An Equo; Opponunrt, Employe,
M 1\ 1 . i -J 3J' JV r "I.I
ASSEH
AFSG �fi RALOWlI'Mf
DATE: APRIL 17, 1990
3535 WD1VA15 [ENrERDRn ST. P1"MINNESM 55710
70: DALE RUNW, D113M R OF C"MM DEMMM
CITY OF EAGA,N
FROM : BOB VMS, 'iR RSPORTATIOH sMINM
'•.JIV JVJ I � VJ
MEMORANDUM
612 490.2000
we have reviewed the concept plan dated February 2, 1990 as presented to us by
Koldt Properties, Inc.. Our review has included:
- Trips generated by the proposed development versus
trips anticipated using the Comprehensive land Use Plan
- Potential operational Impacts to Diffley Road
- Access and internal circulation
Our findings are that the proposed development should have little impact on
Diffley Road operations. Also it appears that traffic to/frov the site should
be able to be accommodated by the existing roadway design and traffic controls.
TRIP GWERATION
The proposed develgvent is located near Eagan's western city boundary.
The site is bounded by Diffley Road on the south, old Trunk highway 13 on
the west and Cedar Avenue (TH-77) on the east. The Comprehensive Land Use
Plan designates this site as GB -PD or a general business planned
development. Currently there exists a number of developments in the
Immediate vicinity of the site:
- west: SuperAmerlea at Diffley Road / TH-13
- South: Metcalf Junior High school
- Northwest: A single family residence and a mini -storage facility
- Horth: Enron Gas Company pipeline pap housings
There is also an existing gable television station located within the
proposed development site on the northwest.
The Sagan Transportation Plan used the Comprehensive OB land use
designation (office and retail) and estimated that approximately 8,60o
average daily trips would occur by year 2010. The current proposal is
estimated to produce roughly the same traffic, however the peak hour
STE- directional distribution would be heavier in -bound in the evens due to
KEN04.*0Nmc. the residential land u 4�*ponent. rHIFFIEWA
WSMAr
G05
DIFFLEY ROAD OPERATIONs AHALySIS
Diffley Road is a four lane roadway divided by a median which provides
left tura lanes at the eastern proposed access. The median ends gear the
westerly access and a painted eastbound left turn lane is provided.
Diffley Road am eptly Carriers slightly more than 5,000 vehicles on an
average day (ADT) at this location. Traffic has been growing at about. 3
Percent per year over the last 10 T'eal`s which is s is i lar to the average
growth for other roads in the state. The Tra►nffportation Flan projects
that In 20 years the volume will be approximately 9,900 ADT.
An avtaalycis of the vpmratimV during the peak tress 20 years hence has
found that the roadway should function quite well under its current design
and with the current stop sign controls on the sidestreets. Some delay
will be inmxred by traffic desiring to tarn onto Diffley Road, however
the delays are t,ed to be relatively short.
ACCSSS AND IRTBRNAL CIRGULATioN
Acoess to Diffley Road ag ears to fuwtion well provided that the lotion
of the easterly m=ess Is refined to line up properly with the Junlor High
School entrance. There are a number of Internal circulation concern
which will have to be resolved during the project review prooess. our
Primary oxxcerns center on the function of the north -south residential
street which connects with the only access to the retail development, The
north -south residential street Carries through traffic through the retail
parking area. The two combined traffic sues say negatively Impact one
another as well as cause a pedestrian safety problem. We also have some
other geometric and parking concerns which Can be resolved during later
more in depth reviews.
�0� TOTAL P.04
RENTS & VACANCY RATES
FOR RENTAL HOUSING IN
EAGAN
CITY OF EAGAN
Projects Constructed 1985 to iDresent:
0 BR 1BR 2 BR, 3 B
Vacancy Rate 14.29% 3.42% 5.03% .61%
Average Monthly Rent $402.50 $543.46 $638.90 $695.95
Protects Constructed Between 1980 and 1985:
0 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR
Vacancy Rate 21.99% 0% 0%
Average ?forth y Rent $500.60 $572.00 $675
Pro-,ec-s Cor.str.:cted Prior to 1980
0 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR
Vacancy Rate 0% 4.23% 3.88% 2.60%
Ave_ace Montlnly Rent $386.43 $438.19 $520.93 $619.16
SOURCE: DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING
& REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MARK S. ULFERS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
w
OVERALL TOTALS
R-2 to R-1
12.90
acres
R-2 to PF
6.00
acres
R-3 to R-1
47.13
acres
R-3 to LI
14.64
acres
R-3 to Commercial
57.00
acres
R-3 to R-2 and R-1
1.47
acres
R-4 to R-1
57.50
acres
-4 to R-3
31.22
acres
R-4 to PF
76.22
acres
R-4 to LI
16.27
acres
R-4 to LB
10.00
acres
R-4 to Commercial
9.00
acres
R-4 to CSC
2.08
acres
R-4 and R-1 to
40.00
acres
Commercial
R-4. PF. and R-3
39.30
acres
to R-1 and R-2
TOTAL 410.83 ]ACRES
REZONED R-4 (MULTIPLE) ACRES
SINCE 1987
1989 REZONINGS
Rasmussen College
Rezoning of 8.5 acres from R-4 to LB.
Campus
Located in NE 1/4 Section 16, W of I -35E,
abutting Federal Drive to the west.
City of Eagan
Comp. Guide Plan Amendment/Rezoning of 1.5
acres of R-4 PD to LB PD.
Located N of Diffley along W side of
Lexington Avenue in Lexington South PD,
SW 1/4 Section 23.
City of Eagan
Comp. Guide Plan Amendment/Rezoning of
10.9 acres from R-2 to R-1 in Lexington
South PD.
Located along the N side of Wilderness Run
Road, and E of Walnut Hill Park in the S
1/2 Section 26.
City of Eagan
Comp. Guide Plan Amendment/Rezoning of 7.4
acres from R-3 to R-1 in Lexington South
PD.
Located S of Diffley, E of Lexington in
the NE 1/4 Section 26.
City of Eagan Comp. Guide Plan Amendment/Rezoning of 60
acres from -R-4 to PF in Lexington South
PD.
Located at SW corner of Diffley and
Lexington in NW 1/4 Section 26 and NE 1/4
Section 27.
Eagan Evangelical Comp. Guide Plan Amendment/Rezoning of
Covenant Church 4.84 acres in Lexington South PD from
R-4 to PF.
Located in SW 1/4 Section 23 between
Lexington Way and Lexington Avenue.
Rings Wood 4th Rezoning of 1.73 acres of R-3 PD to R-1.
Located in NE 1/4 Section 21.
west Publishing Rezoning and PD Amendment of 16.27 acres
Company from R-4 to LI, and 14.64 acres from R-3
to LI.
Located in SE 1/4 Section 13.
Community of Joy
Church Addition
Blackhawk Pond
Thomas Lake Woods
Lexington Land Company
Alden Pond
1988 REZONINGS
Rezoning of 6 acres from R-4 to PP.
Located in SW 1/4 Section 23.
Rezoning of 36.6 acres from R-4 to R-1.
Located in N 1/2 Section 21.
Rezoning of 39.3 acres from R-4 and PP and
R-3 to R-1 and R-2.
Located in SW 1/4 Section 28.
Rezoning of 57 acres fro
Commercial PD.
Located in SE 1/4 Section 10.
Rezoning of 31.22 acres from
Located in W 1/2 Section 9.
Carl R. Olson/ Rezoning of 9 acres from R-4
Lance Company Commercial.
Located in SW 1/4 Section 10
35E.
Saints Martha and Mary
Episcopal Church
Cray Research, Inc.
Rezoning of 5.38 acres from R -
Located at NE intersection of
and Diffley.
Rezoning of 40 acres from R-4
Commercial PD.
Located in S 1/2 Section 1.
'�O
Winkler Development
Company
Tri -Land Properties
1987 REZONINGS
Rezoning of 2 acres from R-2 to R-1.
Located in NW 1/4 Section 31 Winkler -
Jackson PD, Oak Cliff Addition, Block 1.
Rezoning of 28 acres from R-3 PD to R-1.
Lexington Parkview Addition, SW 1/4
Section 1.
Leroy Rother and
Rezoning of
2.08 acres from R-4 to CSC.
Gerald Braun
Located in
SE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 15 N of
(R & B Addition)
Crestridge
Land and S of Duckwood Drive.
Praise Lutheran
Rezoning of
6 acres from R-2 to PF.
Church Addition
Located in
Lexington South PD.
St. Francis Wood 6th
Rezoning of
20.9 acres from R-4 to R-1.
Located in
SE 1/4 Section 15.
Berry Ridge Addition
Rezoning of
1.47 acres from R-3 to R-2 and
R-1.
Located in
the SW 1/4 Section 22.
-J�
1989 TOTALS:
R-2
to
R-1
R-3
to
R-1
R-3
to
LI
R-4 to PF
R-4
to
LI
R-4
to
LB
TOTAL
to
1988 TOTALS:
R-3 to Commercial
R-4 to R-1
R-4 to R-3
R-4 to PF
R-4 and R-1
to Commercial
R-4 to Commercial
R-4, PF, and R-3
to R-1 and R-2
TOTAL
1987
TOTALS•
64.84
R-2
to
R-1
10.00
acres
R-2
to
PF
R-3
to
R-1
R-3
to
R-2 and R-1
R-4
to
R-1
R-4
to
CSC
10.90 acres
9.13 acres
14.64
acres
64.84
acres
16.27
acres
10.00
acres
40.00
acres
125.78
ACRES
57.00
acres
36.60
acres
31.22
acres
11.38
acres
40.00
acres
9.00 acres
39.30 acres
224.50 ACRES
2.00
acres
6.00
acres
28.00
acres
1.47
acres
20.90
acres
.08 acres
TOTAL 60.45 ACRES
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JANUARY 23, 1990
DIFFLEY CEDAR PLANNED DE'i►ELOPMEWT/XOLDT PROPERTIES
Chairman Graves opened the public hearing regarding a rezoning to
amend the Splashland Planned Development to allow a Mixed Use
Multi -Family Residential and Retail Development, and a Comprehensive
Guide Plan amendment for specification of development within an
existing Commercial Planned Development designation of approximately
41 acres located in the northwest corner of the intersection of
Highway 77 and Diffley Road in the southwest quarter of Section 19.
City Planner Jim Sturm reviewed the proposal for the Commission.
Mike Gould (Koldt Properties, Inc.) introduced members of the
team. He pointed out the following regarding the request:
1. Isolation from lower density property;
2. Access to major highways;
3. Excellent views;
4. Reference to the Maxfield letter;
5. Excellent for Mixed Use development.
Peter Pfister
Architects of Mi
the benefits and
that Enron would
outlined the uti
plan.
(architect) reviewed previous projects of Pfister
nneapolis. He reviewed the Eagan sites and explained
draw backs. He stated the views are excellent and
provide landscaping and screening on its site. He
lity availability and reviewed the proposed site
Mike Falk gave an overview of the leasing of retail.
Chairman Graves explained that the City was looking to down -zone
R-4 uses. He stated the proposal looked very nice. Commissionmember
Miller questioned the current zoning. City Planner Jim Sturm pointed
out the current zoning was Planned Development. Commissionmember
Miller asked if the use was appropriate for the zoning. He also asked
what would happen when the Planned Development lapsed. Community
Development Director Dale Runkle stated that the City must terminate
Planned Developments. City Attorney Mike Dougherty explained the
process.
-j3
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JANUARY 23, 1990
Commissionmember Gorman commented that the developers did their
homework as the proposal was a quality product. He felt uncomfortable
accepting more R-4 and strip malls. Commissionmember Miller stated he
felt the proposal was a nice affair but that the citizens had stated
they did not want more R-4 development. Commissionmember Merkley
echoed their concerns. He stated he was against more high density
housing. He appreciated the project, but felt there was enough R-4
zoned land in Eagan. Commissionmember Miller asked if the strip mall
were eliminated, if the plan would be better received by the
Commission. Commissionmember Voracek felt the Commercial needed to
eliminated or the density reduced. He felt R-2 zoning would be
acceptable. He pointed out the problem with the Cable TV location.
Peter Pfister pointed out that the area on the ridge was zoned
Industrial. He explained the cable location options.
Commissionmember Trygg remarked that the plan was nice but that
it would be creating more apartments. Chairman Graves asked what the
City would do with the parcel. He pointed out that if General
Business use was proposed, the City's hands may be tied. He commented
that the project looks very nice but that it was not the best use for
the property.
Commissionmember Voracek questioned the feasibility of an R-1
development. Chairman Graves referenced the Burnsville development.
Mike Gould explained that from a planning standpoint, the
proposed use would be the best use. He felt down -zoning was an
economic issue. He stated that economics were not there for
townhouses. He explained that housing can stand on its own merits and
that the retail use could be reexamined.
Commissionmember Miller suggested a continuance. Chairman Graves
questioned if the developer would agree to a continuance or if it
requested the matter go before the Council. Mr. Gould stated he would
like time to reexamine the matter.
Chairman Graves suggested further review regarding the relocation
Of the cable company, elimination of the R-4 zoning and removal of
the retail center. He felt the design was nice. Commissionmember
Voracek requested better graphics of the chimney. He pointed out that
vacancy in Eagan was high.
Miller moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and continue the rezoning and a Comprehensive Guide Plan
amendment for the Diffley Cedar Planned Development as requested by
Koldt Properties to a future Advisory Planning Commission meeting.
All voted in favor.
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 1990
DIFFLEY CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPXZNT/XOLDT PROPERTIES
Chairman Graves convened the next public hearing regarding a
rezoning to amend the Splashland Planned Development to allow a mixed
use multi -family residential and retail development and a
Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment for specification of development
within an existing Commercial Planned Development designation of
approximately 41 acres located in the northwest corner of the
intersection of Highway 77 and Diffley Road in the southwest quarter
of Section 19.
City Planner Jim Sturm explained the application to the
Commission and detailed the changes.
Mike Gould (Koldt Properties, Inc.) further explained the changes
to the Commission.
Peter Pfister (architect) reviewed and compared the previous
proposal to the new proposal. He displayed diagrams and slides of
similar developments. He also diagramed the zoning changes in the
City. Mr. Gould further described the slides and explained that
retail and residential would work well together.
Chairman Graves stated that most of the issues had been addressed
and felt that Koldt Properties were responsive to the concerns of the
City. He felt it was a nice plan and that the density had been
reduced.
Commissionmember Merkley questioned if the apartments could be
eliminated. Mr. Gould pointed out that the cost would be prohibitive
and that having all townhomes was not feasible. Commissionmember
Merkley further had questions regarding the status of the cable
company, site line interference and the use of the strip portion. Mr.
Gould responded to his concerns and pointed out that the use of the
strip portion would be community uses - neighborhood center.
Commissionmember Staehli asked for the phasing timeframe. Mr.
Gould stated the timeframe was three years. Commissionmember Hoeft
asked if there would be drainage into the pond. Mr. Pfister stated
there would be partial draining into the pond. Assistant City
Engineer Mike Foertsch explained the proposed drainage.
Commissionmember Hoeft questioned if there would be other recreation
facilities. Mr. Pfister explained that the matter needed to be
explored in further detail.
Commissionmember Gorman had questions regarding the Planned
Development and the total capacity. Mr. Pfister pointed out that the
total capacity would be 750 people. Commissionmember Trygg asked who
would manage the site. Mr. Gould explained that Koldt Properties
would be on-site managers.
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 1990
Commissionmember Merkley felt the change was a better plan but
still would prefer the elimination of the apartments. Chairman Graves
pointed out that the view would be nice but that he too had concerns
with the apartments. Commissionmember Staehli asked if any similar
projects had already been built by Koldt Properties. Mr. Pfister
explained two similar projects. Commissionmember Trygg felt there was
a good mix and location. Commissionmember Gorman felt the building
features needed to be pinned down further. Mr. Gould described the
building materials and the rental rates. Chairman Graves questioned
the range of the Planned Development. City Attorney Mike Dougherty
explained Planned Developments.
Chairman Graves requested an additional condition allowing only
two -three story 66 unit apartments. Commissionmember Staehli
requested an addition of a condition stating no gas pumps would be
allowed. Commissionmember Merkley recommended Koldt Properties
contact the cable company and obtain its agreement with the plan and
the relocation of its building.
Merkley moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment from a
Commercial Planned Development designation to a Mixed Residential and
Retail Planned Development, of approximately 41 acres located in the
northwest corner of the intersection of Highway 77 and Diffley Road
in the southwest quarter of Section 19, as requested by Koldt
Properties. All voted in favor.
Merkley moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to approve the rezoning
to amend the Splashland Planned Development to allow a Mixed Use
Multi -Family Residential and Retail Development known as Diffley
Cedar Planned Development, as requested by the Koldt Properties,
subject to the following conditions:
1. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a
five year period.
2. A phasing plan shall be submitted with the Preliminary Plat of
the 1st Addition.
3. An overall landscape plan shall be prepared.
4. An overall sign agreement shall be entered into.
5. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened.
6. An overall design theme shall be carried out in the
residential area, to include materials referenced in the staff
report.
*"? (140,
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 1990
7. All commercial areas shall be constructed with the same
materials with all sides of the buildings being constructed of the
same material.
8. All trash/recycling areas shall be contained within the
buildings.
9. All applicable environmental permits shall be obtained.
10. The development is subject to additional requirements as
identified by City staff during the platting phases of development
necessary to provide adequate public infrastructure facilities to
service the development.
11. Only two -three story 66 unit apartments will be allowed.
12. No gasoline pumps shall be allowed.
All voted in favor.
_� I
EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MARCH 27, 1990
DIFFLEY/CEDAR PLANNED DEVELOPXM - XOLDT PROPERTIES
Chairman Graves opened the first public hearing for the evening
regarding a rezoning to amend the Splashland PD (Planned Development)
to allow Mixed Use Multi -Family Residential and Retail Development
and a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for specification of
development within an existing CPD (Commercial Planned Development)
designation of approximately 41 acres located in the northwest corner
of the intersection of Highway 77 and Diffley Road in the southwest
quarter of Section 19.
City Planner Jim Sturm summarized the application for the
Commission and presented the background information. He noted that
the City Council had referred the item back to the Planning
Commission, and recapped the five general concerns made known by the
Council at their March 6 meeting. City Planner Jim Sturm indicated
the plan had not changed from the previously approved plan but that a
staging plan has been developed and the landscape architect had been
retained. He further stated that Enron will meet with the City to
discuss this landscaping.
Mike Gould (Koldt Properties) stated that they will meet with
Short -Elliott -Hendrickson to study the Diffley traffic affect. SEH
will then prepare a letter on the affect. Mr. Gould further stated
that the developer will be meeting with the School Superintendent to
determine the school impact. He also stated that the project has been
cut back as much as possible.
Peter Pfister (Architect for the project) described the phasing
of the project. He stated that the development would start on the
southern end of the property and develop northwards. He estimated
approximately two years to complete the project. He presented details
on the row house buildings and described the hard cover on the
project as being approximately 35%.
Fred Dukatz, 1915 East Blue Stone, asked if handicapped access
would be available. The architect responded that it would.
Chairman Graves stated that he was surprised when this item came
back and he needed more information on why it was referred back. City
Planner Sturm referred to the resolution of the Council and reviewed
the five points raised. Commissionmember Trygg stated she did not
understand condition 3 in that this was a Planned Development and not
an R-4 zoning. Mr. Pfister stated that there was a lot of green space
on the project. City Planner Sturm stated that the staging plan may
eliminate some of the concern of item 3.
Chairman Graves asked how many acres of retail would be involved
in the project. The developer stated approximately 6.7 acres.
Chairman Graves further questioned the unit density. Commissionmember
Merkley stated that he felt that the Council was not comfortable with
the density of the project and that they wanted a different use. He
felt that the Advisory Planning Commission should not act on the same
project.
-? i
jAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
ARCH 27, 1990
Commissionmember Gorman stated that the Council thought that the R
Advisory Planning Commission was not in tune with the City'rs
direction on this project and that they wanted a more creative and
innovative alternative project. Commissionmember Voracek stated that
the Council concerns had not been addressed and felt that the only
options were to continue for more information or deny.
Commissionmember Miller stated that this was the same proposal
that the Advisory Planning Commission gave unanimous approval to the
month before and wondered what had changed. Chairman Graves recapped
the history of the proposal and stated that the Council minutes and
conditions did not give sufficient direction to the Planning
Commission. Commissionmember Miller agreed and stated that nothing
had changed since the last review by the Planning Commission. He
further stated that had he been present at the last month's meeting,
he would have objected to the Cable and Enron parcels in the
development.
Mr. Gould stated that the developer planned to approach the cable
site relocation through the Cable Commission but that Enron could be
buffered and would not require acquisition. He stated that three of
the five Council points would be addressed in the next week or so and
that the School had not raised the issue of increased enrollment. He
further stated that he did not have all the answers tonight. Chairman
Graves asked if retail was necessary for the project. Mr. Gould
stated that it was. Chairman Graves then asked if the retail could be
delayed and have the residential put in first. Mr. Gould stated that
half of the residential would be built in the first phase and then
retail. Chairman Graves stated that the developer should examine this
option. Commissionmember Hoeft stated that the Council felt there
were too many units in this project; that the project did not change
and therefore the discussion of the matter may be moot.
There was more discussion regarding the Council rationale for
referring it back to the Planning Commission. Chairman Graves stated
that a continuance was not appropriate on this item. Commissionmember
Merkley stated that he felt that it was a quality development but
that the Council wanted something different.
City Attorney Mike Dougherty explained that the applicant had
requested the return to the Planning Commission rather than have the
Council vote on the item on March 6. Chairman Graves stated that the
minutes from the Council should be more informative on items such as
these. Commissionmember Merkley agreed. Chairman Graves stated that
the return of two members who were not present last month and the
developerfs future meetings would provide more information for the
Council. Commissionmember Voracek stated he was against the proposal
as did Commissionmember Miller.
Miller moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to reaffirm the February
Advisory Planning Commission vote to approve the Diffley/Cedar
Planned Development proposal. Trygg and Graves voted for; Miller,
Voracek, Hoeft, Merkley and Gorman voted against. The motion failed.
Agenda Information Meeting
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
POLICE FIREARMS RANG SPECIAL PERMIT
A. Special Permit, City of Apple Valley, Burnsville and Eagan to Allow a Police Firearms
Range to be Located in a Light Industrial District --An application has been submitted by
the Apple Valley Police Department for a special use permit to allow a firing range in a
limited industrial district. A special use permit application does not require review by the
Advisory Planning Commission.
For additional information on the item, refer to a report prepared by the Community
Development Department enclosed on pages through �.
The City Council might recall that action was taken to approve an allocation of up to
$30,000 to participate in the outdoor shooting range with the City of Apple Valley,
assuming any additional dollars in the fund balance carry over from 1989. There has been
no commitment made to the City of Apple Valley and the City may want to evaluate that
commitment once the financial report is completed for calendar year 1989.
City Councilmember Gustafson, Chief of Police Geagan and the City Administrator have
had discussions periodically about the feasibility of an indoor shooting range. Although
the action before the City Council is land use related, it seemed appropriate to provide
a brief background on the concept of an indoor range. Following some informal
discussions with City Councilmember Gustafson and Chief of Police Geagan during the
months of January and February the City Administrator contacted the Apple Valley City
Administrator to discuss their plans regarding both an outdoor and indoor shooting range.
For additional information on that discussion, refer to a copy of the mem randum dated
February 27, 1990 entitled 'Police Shooting Range" enclosed on pages and
Since that meeting the city manager/city administrators of Burnsville, Apple Valley and
Eagan met to further discuss the feasibility of a joint shooting range. The City of Apple
Valley is willing to include both the cities of Burnsville and Eagan as users or partners in
the outdoor shooting range as proposed. As a part of the new municipal center/police
department complex that was built for the City of Burnsville space was provided for an
indoor shooting range. The City of Burnsville would entertain a joint venture with the
cities of Apple Valley and Eagan for finishing off that facility and providing an indoor
shooting range opportunity. It is the intention of Burnsville to consider public use of the
facility coordinated by their Parks and Recreation Department. This discussion is offered
for informational purposes with no recommendation or action intended regarding the
concept of an indoor shooting range at this time.
Agenda Information Meeting
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
permit that would allow the City of Apple Valley and
police firearms range to be located in a light industrial
To approve or deny the special
Cities of Burnsville and Eagan a
district located in Section 8.
SUBJECT: SPECIAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: CAPTAIN TERRY COOK, APPLE VALLEY POLICE
DEPARTMENT
LOCATION: PID #10-00800-040-75, SE SECTION 8
EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 1, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 24, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY:. An application has been submitted by Captain Terry Cook
of the Apple Valley Police Department for a Special Use Permit to allow a firing range
in a Limited Industrial district.
COMMENTS: The outdoor firing range has been purchased by the City of Apple Valley;
an additional three and a half acres will be deeded to the City by MSA (Dunn &
Bradstreet) which will be used for access to the site. Also, Captain Cook is negotiating
with Mr. Roger Olson for an additional 66' along the railroad and the 382' north property
line. A Joint Powers Agreement between Apple Valley, Burnsville, and Eagan will be
entered into as all three police departments will be sharing the operations of this facility.
The site plan indicates three shooting positions, a decision shooting area, a 50 yard and
a 100 yard position. The site was designed according to the NRa manual. There are a
couple of buffer zones which are separated from the shooting areas by 7' barrier walls,
with 6' of rock in 2" x 8" planks. There will be traps at the end of the ranges with
concrete bottoms to catch the lead.
A 24' x 32' building will be located on the site to be used as a classroom.
If approved, this Special Use Permit shall be subject to all applicable Code requirements.
:,
ZONING MAP
9%
STREET MAP
H
19L
z
u
W
W
W
J
u
Z
>
Q
M
C
z
C
0
m
W
h
�O
IL
W
O
�
d
Q
W
J
a
IL
M
MEMO TO: CITY COUNCILMEMBER GUSTAFSON l
CHIEF OF POLICE GEAGAN
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1990
SUBJECT: POLICE SHOOTING RANGE
The Apple Valley City Administrator Tom Melena has been at Guard
camp the past two (2) weeks and I was unable to contact him with
questions about their plans for an outdoor shooting range until
today. Apparently, the City of Apple Valley is planning to move
ahead with land acquisition and development of an outdoor shooting
range in the Sibley Industrial Park. The purpose of the shooting
range is to allow combat/SWAT activities that require physical
movement, use of squad cars and, eventually, pop-up figures that
would provide a shoot/no shoot simulation. The cost is $25,000 for
the land acquisition and approximately $100,000 to $125,000 for on-
site improvements. The National Guard has agreed to construct a
road to the site and, according to the City Administrator, this is
their only involvement in the development of the outdoor shooting
range. The City of Apple Valley is hopeful that the communities
of Burnsville and Eagan will participate, however, with or without
joint participation, they are proceeding ahead.
I asked about the feasibility of an indoor shooting range and their
plans for an armory. It is true that the City, their total cost,
could include an indoor shooting range with the armory that would
be available for use by other departments and possibly as a quasi
public facility if properly staffed by the Apple Valley Parks and
Recreation Department. It appears the armory will not be
constructed for approximately three (3) years. I asked the City
Administrator if the City of Apple Valley would consider joint
ownership or use in a facility if the City of Eagan were to either
acquire a building or negotiate a long-term lease or buy an indoor
shooting range that was available their use. It is his opinion
that the total cost for the shooting range is an obligation to the
City of Apple Valley and, whether funds are appropriated for the
armory or a building in the City of Eagan, they, would consider both
alternatives.
In summary, the City of Apple Valley's philosophy regarding a
police shooting range is two -fold: 1) They believe an outdoor
shooting range is important for maneuvers such as shoot/no shoot
behind squad cars, actual physical movement with pop -ups and other
simulated activities, and 2) An indoor shooting range provides a
different type of training, including target practice and other
still -shot operations.
It would seem appropriate that we pursue the Jerry Lewis Theatres
and other buildings that might provide the opportunity for either
acquisition or long-term lease and provide a business proforma to
determine what type of cost would be associated with an indoor
shooting range for our City. I would suggest that Chief Geagan
contact the surrounding communities, including Burnsville,
Bloomington, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota Heights and Rosemount in
addition to Apple Valley, to see what type of interest there is in
an indoor shooting range. We also need to make a policy decision
as to whether the City of Eagan wants to invest in both types of
shooting ranges as Apple Valley is proposing with their outdoor
shooting range and eventually an indoor range. Obviously, another
opportunity is to participate with Apple Valley in the outdoor
shooting range which provides at least target practice and some
other on-site operations and commit to a joint ownership of the
shooting range within the armory to be constructed in Apple Valley.
There a number of opportunities to pursue and we need to discuss
the various alternatives, adopt some City Council policy and
objectives and proceed with the appropriate negotiations.
City Administrator
TLH/vmd
Q'
Agenda Information Meeting
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
SPECIAL PERMITIEAGAN CHRISTIAN CENTER
B. Special Permit, Eagan Christian Center, for Two Years to Allow the Eagan Christian
Center to use a Building Located on Light Industrial Zoned Property for Purpose of
Holding Church Meetings --An application was submitted by Pastor J. Zinn, requesting a
special permit for two years to allow the Eagan Christian Center to use a building located
on light industrial zoned property for the purpose of holding church meetings. For
additional information on this item, refer to a report prepared by the Community
Development Department enclosed on pages through .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special permit
to the Eagan Christian Center for two years to allow the Eagan Christian Center to use
a building located on light industrial zoned property for the purpose of holding church
meetings.
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT
APPLICANT: EAGAN CHRISTIAN CENTER
LOCATION: CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARR R.L.S.
PART OF TRACT F
EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 11 1990
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 11, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Pastor
Jay Zinn requesting a Special Permit for two years to allow the
Eagan Christian Center to use a building located on Light
Industrial zoned property for the purpose of holding church
meetings.
COMMENTS: The Eagan Christian Center originally was granted a
Special Permit for two years in August 1986. In August of 1988,
the Center was granted an extension of two years. According to the
applicant, the church has no intention of making this
office/warehouse site their permanent location, but they do plan
to purchase and develop land in Eagan within two years.
If approved, this Special Permit shall be subject to the following
conditions:
1. This temporary permit shall expire two years after approval.
2. Church functions shall be limited to Wednesday evenings and
weekends.
3. The permit shall be subject to all Code requirements.
3
Agenda Information Meeting
May 1, 1990 City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITNETERINARY CLINIC
C. Conditional Use Permit, Elizabeth A. Aird, to Allow a Veterinarian Clinic in a CSC
District on Lot 4, Block 1, Town Centre 100 6th Addition --A conditional use permit
application was submitted by Elizabeth Aird to allow a veterinarian clinic in a community
shopping center district, specifically Town Centre Shoppes, Lot 4, Block 1, Town Centre
100 6th Addition.
For additional information on this item, refer to a copy of a report pre ,a,r�ed by the
Community Development Department enclosed on pages through �.
AC71ON TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use
permit for Elizabeth A. Aird to allow a veterinarian clinic in a CSC district on Lot 4,
Block 1, Town Centre 100 6th Addition.
N4
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: ELIZABETH AIRD
LOCATION: TOWN CENTRE SHOPPES
LOT 4, BLOCK 1, TOWN CENTRE 100 6TH ADD.
EXISTING ZONING: CSC PD (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER,
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 24, 1990
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 17, 1990
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional
Use Permit to allow a veterinary clinic in a Community Shopping Center district.
COMMENTS: The Zoning Code (Chapter 11 of the City Code) does not list veterinary
clinics as a use in the CSC zoning district. This use is permitted in the General Business
district and is allowed as a land use in the Neighborhood Business district; however Eagan
Pet Clinic has been located in a CSC district for years and approximately one year ago,
a Conditional Use Permit was granted for a veterinary clinic to locate in Cliff Lake Centre
which is also zoned CSC.
According to the applicant, care for animals will be for small pet animals only (dogs, cats,
rabbits, etc). The majority of service will be outpatient, however clients requiring surgery
will be held overnight.
If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to all applicable Ordinances and
licensing requirements.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - IS -CU -3-3-90:
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the
past and the uses proposed for the property, no charges are
proposed.
G�O
0
SUJOIIS 3HINX) NMOI
%< b b
u u y
z z
ommoodbibmi
lml�j.
an
Lt
Val
C)
0
I
•QAV >fiewuaq
Agenda Information Memo
May 1, 1990, City Council Meeting
CONSIDERATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL
COACHMAN & YANKEE DOODLE ROADS
D. Consideration of Traffic Signal, Coachman & Yankee Doodle Roads --City staff has
been receiving several requests for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of
Coachman Road and Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28). During December of
1989, the City Council reviewed Dakota County's proposed 5 -year CIP Program. At that
time, although the traffic signal was proposed to be installed in 1991 under the County's
program, the City Council requested that it be accelerated for installation in 1990.
However, Dakota County personnel indicated that they did not have the funding available
to accelerate this signal installation as requested by the City.
Recently, Dakota County Commissioner Chapdelaine has contacted City staff indicating
that numerous requests continue to be made for this early installation. In discussions with
Dakota County staff, the City was informed that if the City would agree to prefinance the
County's share of this installation, they would consider installing it during the later part
of 1990.
Therefore, the City Council should determine whether they want to consider prefinancing
the County's share (approximately $45,000) in addition to the City's equal share or,
reiterate our earlier position and request that the County similarily try to respond to their
local constituents by arranging the appropriate financing for their share.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To restate the City's position
requesting the installation of a traffic signal at Coachman & Yankee Doodle Roads during
1990 with either a) the City agreeing to prefinance the County's share, or; b) request
Dakota County to provide their share of financing similar to the City for installation in
1990.
C�3
