Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
02/03/1987 - City Council Regular
.AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL FEBRUARY 3, 1987 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Fire Department ?.1 1. Selection of Architect for Fire Station #4 Project B. Public Works Department r,�.9 1. Review County Functional Classification System IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA RA. Personnel Items ?.at B. Approve Purchase of Vehicles #113 and #124 (Dump Trucks) Through Hennepin County Bid Approve Joint Powers Agreement for 1987 Traffic Lane Striping V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS P. -23A. Public Hearing for Project 486, E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer Public Hearing for Project 488, Blackhawk Road - Street Improve- ments Public Hearing for Project 492, Lone Oak 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities VI. OLD BUSINESS .-7BA. Request to Eliminate the Condition Requiring Indoor Trash Storage for the Town Centre 100 Professional Building Located on Town Centre Drive East of Denmark Avenue, Lot 2, Block 1, Town Centre 100 2nd Addition, NW 1/4 of Sec 15 VIQI. NEW BUSINESS A. Consideration to Update Comprehensive Guide Plan and Submit Plan to Metropolitan Council for Review 0%0 B. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from D -II to RSC, Preliminary Plat, Bieter Company, for 35E Diffley Center Addition and a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to RSC (Regional Shopping Center) Planned for Approximately 91 Acres, Located NE Quadrant of 35E and Co Rd 30, SW 1/4 of Section 21 C. Resolution Authorizing Division of Parcels 10-01900-015-05 and 10-01900-011-54, Splashland Waterparks, Inc. NEW BBUSINESS (continued) D. Special Permit to Allow a 2nd Building -Mounted Sign Totaling 110 SF at the Eagan Convenience Center Located at the Intersection of Duckwood and Krestwood Lane, NW 1/4 of Sec 15 OE. Waiver of Plat in Order to Split a Duplex Lot for Owner Occupancy on Lot 10, Block 2, Cedar Cliff 3rd Addition, Along Scott Trail, SE 1/4 of Sec 30 P • 11 F. Waiver of Plat, Northwestern Bell (R. Dokken) to Combine a 40'X50' Parcel with the Existing Utility Building Located Along Lexington tt Avenue, North of County Road 30, SW 1/4 of Sec 23 Preliminary Plat, Requested by Chapel Hill Baptist Church, for a Church on Approx 9 Acres and a Rezonin=g from A (Agricultural) to PF (Public Facility) Located Abutting Pilot Knob Rd to the West, North of Carriage Hill Dr, NW 1/4 of Sec 34 P.igo H. Lone Oak 2nd Addition, Final Plat Condition Review and Temporary Building Permit Request VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS A.••11 Public Improvement Contracts: 1. Contract 86-15, Final Payment/Acceptance (Hampton Heights - Trunk Watermain) 2. Contract 85-15, Final Payment/Acceptance (Royal Oak Circle - Streets and Utilities) 3. Contract 85-21, .Approved Change Order #5 (Maintenance Building) B. Private Improvement Contracts: VC � 1. Contract 84-D, Final Acceptance (Lexington Square 1st Addition - Streets and Utilities) 2. Contract 86-K, Final Acceptance (Dallas Development lst Addition (Trunk Watermain Relocation) •p.14 C. Restructuring Program for the Series 1980 1 3,wo.i. Update and Status Regarding Collective Bargaining Demands IX. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 30, 1987 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval is given to the February 3, 1987 agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the January 20, 1987 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: A. FIRE DEPARTMENT Item 1. Selection of Architect for Fire Station #4 Project --The Public Works Committee met on Monday, January 26 and interviewed four (4) architectural firms and it is the recommendation of that Committee and other members of the interview panel that the firm of Arthur Dickey Architects, located at 4930 France Avenue South, Minneapolis, be retained as the architect for the Fire Station 4 project. For additional information regarding the interview process, referto a memo prepared by the City Administrator found on page (s) Z — ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the selection of Arthur Dickey Architects as the architect to be retained for the proposed Fire Station #4 project. r MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 29, 1987 SUBJECT: SELECTION OF ARCHITECT FOR FIRE STATION #4 AND UPDATE REGARDING FIRE STATION #4 The Public Works Committee was directed by the City Council to interview four (4) architectural firms and recommend the selection of a firm to the City Council. That Committee met on Monday, January 26, from approximately 5:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. and interviewed four (4) firms and is recommending that the City Council select Arthur Dickey Architects Inc. An interview committee consisting of City Council members Wachter and Ellison, Fire Chief Southorn, District Chief Schindeldecker, Fire Building Committee Chairman John Grinland and City Administrator Hedges interviewed the following firms: Boarman and Associates_, Peter Racchini and Associates, Arthur Dickey Architects Inc. and Trossen/Wright and Associates Architects. An RFP was prepared by Administrative Assistant Hohenstein and sent to twelve (12) architectural firms. Those firms were reduced to four firms by Chief Southorn and City Administrator Hedges. The entire interview team was in agreement that Arthur Dickey Architects Inc. was the number one recommendation, pending reference checks by the City staff. Those reference checks were completed and the firm was given good recommendations by all persons contacted. Enclosed on pagesthrough is a copy of the personnel and project approa�hasprepared by Arthur Dickey for the Eagan Fire Station project. That firm was awarded the Inver Grove Heights fire station # 1 project, which is a new four bay fire station.consisting of 14,840 square feet. The Eagan fire station will be approximately 4,000 square feet. Other similar projects include Minneapolis fire station's # 6 and 7, Eden Prairie fire stations and the Edina fire station. He has also recently constructed the Bloomington National Guard Armory, vehicle storage buildings and various park shelters in various suburban communities. This firm also constructed approximately six (6) outstate fire departments. The Committee was impressed with the firm's record of estimating projects, realizing that the Bloomington National Guard was 9% under bid. The most recent bid was for the Inver Grove Heights fire station which is 1% within budget. This firm emphasized the ability to work closely with volunteers in the initial design. The Fire Department representatives were impressed with the firms knowledge of fire station detail and project management inspection schedules. The fee structure is based on the standard 7 1/2% with 1/3 of the fee before the bond referendum and the remaining 2/3 during and upon completion of the bond referendum. v Fire Station #4 January 29, 1987 Page Two Site Location For Fire Station #4 The City Administrator and Fire Chief Southorn have investigated sites on Dodd Road between Diffley and Wilderness Run Road. The site that appears to be the choice of the Fire Department is the Haeg property which is located between Hackmore and Golden Meadow Road on the west side of Dodd Road. The cost for four lots that include a house, barn and shed is $99,000 plus approximately $15,000 of special assessments. The City Administrator will discuss the site in further detail at the meeting on Tuesday. r loma Q,,'° City Administrator ZEN cc: Fire Chief Ken Southorn District Chief Dick Schindeldecker Building Committee Chairperson John Grinland Administrative Assistant Jon Hohenstein TLH/jeh N (D :3rt (h A) w �t nC r' P. I.E. Erl rot Cis � •�•�'� � i� rt rt r n • 0 r -34 M(D ••En0rpj~ �{rt0 rt p b M1 ° (11 0 �•' r• P. .• �d' cn cn J rt 0 b H (Drt � a m P- re o n0 vIP 0 rtP-�,� nrt r• �o � n W. 00 N c�pt rt 0 rt A N � r°h w v .D rh � ?p N !rte X11 H rt H. rt FA Kr U1 H. �t rt Fes-' r. 10 " rrt Ft k� a Hhh��•w RR 20rt2 rt ro �•rta rt r - 01 •0 a I .. h' � � �ri• � R Mme•• � N rlW rt n rt v If0 O r ft rt� K co N FA Kr -; I- [ F— cat P• rt,H (D H• x w to n(( � Er oV 8 11 N w � am r p,obnNn a o w n s � n' to H. 0 0] rpt PO Mm m "�w• �•�:oN< En H� �o' H. rr rt m L' cu o �• m rat �• m N•r•a ctwLw7d (D �- n H• ] rt O• •• (n n n �• (D w (rD o N' ". � Gm`s � rur' m H• H. rt, °. n tfi O (D r• 1 (n N pi O • fi 7 2 W fn rpt rt. U) m s :rm ►�-� (n (D N• rt, W x n� rr c cr y U), n 0 ril PV `4 rt,aw F-' � rt* O �+ (D n (n p RR�. r R+ f1 d Wt � (Dt G t-1Ai N cctkC Pi Or �� c U) g � m • fi �rro�'' Fit m(rn`tH. H 2 in 0 rt (a F��• r• N rt Ea 0 c~t tot, (rD om a ".. ° ro `n(D6(Dn ctro n(�oGrt FH. a + rt .� • rt (D r r SaoW."o n mts ro R �� � (�rt 9H.P.m� C K :30z P. ft �N0 (D H0to c0i rtto rt 'R� a�� ro K K r• •cr• r(D N Q'Nr08D o0)o � rtp, � r• K ~ rt , �En a• Z0oart CD rt0 (n �no rt. o �t�naD H fifi E G+ q( m W. (D 0 N rt 0 0• W ��'• roi, W G1+ K n m fG]Nr rrm rr 00 � K~ 8 fDn w N Md O r• : rt pp�0 01 Hrt Ul .. H. �. xt rt (n IQ N o ,t rt 0 �o o r• rt- , N m,• C r• 1 A� (Dh r:31- o Q• 0 ca lw �• o tri� � 2 �' :' N is mfi R up.0rt rt* p, W Q ,r"f hS In•• (j S)i > S» to > 0 Q rt a 0 0 ) O N K 1r -h• " G a N 1H. 1...• 9) r• ¢, K n O rt 0- (D0 �0 d aa� rtw m 0 I N rt* (D (D o rt �C (D xpr•�wa H. o' P �p gyp; a� "'Q 0 r'• fb cr H tD i O r. haw ,U)M pt H� p' H � Hoto ro(D U1 QJ Nrt " �pj� 0 FJ ownn ~r* K r- o , � '� En rt fv (D n O H. O Fd (D rt- A► o� o In En N hti ( M rt* 9) std ((DD 0• /j rrr w (D C ���+ +'?. _y x •ye'Jy„ -.s1f `.� - �: •- '�• '' vyy"'F{-°" fa`gxri^.'i"7ax+f. "gax'e,'�'',l R. rY-t S-•r'wr: "w7'+..•,df-••�-✓m-.rg.wr k"'aa"�,gtpp:. yam+ _.{Y-trx,h0 �:� _--,.�-._;. :_1>:: �-_,fie. .. :.• -•.,a ... . - _ _ -- _ _ _ � Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Two B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Item 1. Review County Functional Classification System --Enclosed on page11} is a letter the staff received from the Dakota County High ay Department concerning the preliminary functional classification system as adoped by the County Board. That portion of the overall County system within the City of Eagan is referenced on page . This functional classification system is based on the definition provided by th Metropolitan Council as further explained on pages /2" through 'W. Enclosed on pages 4� and -I,. is a listing of the various functional classifications of streets within the City of Eagan as approved by the City Council on July 23, 1985. These classifications were created taking into consideration the definition referenced in the 1980 Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan as shown on page 4- In comparing the County's proposed functional classification system with thea City of Eagan's, identified discrepencies are listed on page With these exceptions, their functional classification system conforms to the City of Eagan's. It is staff's recommendation that the City's response make reference to these classification discrepencies and that the final map be modified accordingly. The Public Works Director will have larger scale maps to further identify the various streets involved at the meeting on Tuesday night. If the Council has any other questions, comments or concerns, they should be provided for staff's response to the County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve/modify the preliminary functional classification system for major routes within Dakota County. DAKOTA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 7,znn WCCT 1 A7:h CTPCGT CI IITP H&W December 18, 1986 Mr. Tom Colbert City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Colbert: DAVID L. EVERDS, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER (612) 431-1150 APPI C 1/6I I CV AAIAIAICC(1TA rC;19A Attached for your review and comment is a map indicating the recently adopted preliminary Functional Classification System for major routes in Dakota County. The preliminary system adopted by the County Board is marked as Exhibit 1. We have also included for your review and comment Exhibit 1a, which includes a possible alignment of a cross county minor arterial highway primarily on the 170th street alignment. Please forward any comments you or your agency wish to make regarding the adopted preliminary Functional Classification System and/or regarding the Exhibit 1a alternative to: Mr. David Robley Dakota County Highway Department 7300 147th Street East Suite 402 Apple Valley, MN 55124 Sincerely, ' David M. Robley Transportation Engineer PIIS/DMR/mjh attachment: Maps AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER INTERSTATE FREEWAY MAJOR ARTERIAL MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR TRANSPORTATION T/9/84 6. Subregional boundaries should, where practical, follow other administrative boundaries such as: a. Political units b. Municipal service districts (e.g. fire, police protection, school districts) c. Established transportation data collection zones 7. Subregions should to the extent possible be centrally traversed by existing and proposed metropolitan highway links. 8. A subregion should incorporate the majority of home-based trips to a major activity center located within that subregion. lv APPENDIX C FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CRITERIA AND ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Functional classification involves determining what function each roadway should perform before determining streetwidths, speed limits, intersection control, or other design features. Functional classi- fication ensures that non -transportation factors, such as land use and development, are taken into account. A major purpose of functional classification is to determine which routes should be on the metro- politan roadway system. Functional classification is also used to decide which roads to use for transit service. Once function is established, appropriate or desirable design and operational characteristics can be used as further guidelines for implementation. The criteria of the functional classification system are presented in Table C-1. Table C-2 lists typical characteristics for roadways. The criteria are intended to be the primary tool for determining the function of a roadway. The characteristics are intended to be guidelines when plans are developed for a given classified route. However, if the guide- lines are significantly different for a given highway, they may be used to supplement the criteria in making a final decision on the function of that given highway. The functional classification system consists of five classes of roadways within the Seven -County Metropolitan Area: Interstate freeway, major arterials, minor arterials, collector streets and local streets. The roadways are the publicly provided elements of a land transportation system. 55 Metropolitan Highways A. Interstate freeways B. Major arterials Local Highways and Roads A. Minor arterials B. Collector streets E. Local streets TRANSPORTATION T/9/84 MC73 t C C N y U L Y 7 p L y O % •Y Y C y C C ? C Ccc "U O p ,> 7 L s 0 0 0 0 E a c m Y X C Y M C O O U O� L C mCm v N 61 N •O N CD .0 ;� O crnuE o '� O O y Uo� 1i O Q .. -0 cf0i Q o'm Q0 a' oRnF w o Eo.�a J U c yL o a ct m F y Q y y y C O O m + -O 00 +-' y ; U E C t y O p c y O` _ C a m O uYi N 2 y vi V •� T — D Lr+ +T rn y •� L a O a1 }`y U O i •D O N 7 d m y y Col`o +�co U Ec°i d 0 o > w = a QC Q y, V a1 a) c Cn O •— a) O N O > 3 E a7 v m Y y E 0 Q _ O U O '- U 3 m C o a m _ p 0 F- u- 0 a C O O •� a m. Y O o: cc O y Y m a0. C m a7 'o v C 0 •Y Vi 2 aci c 3 yo'°�� �3a_ W A Q "O O m C 'p� _ y Z a) C , 11 Y O f0 N` O O 0 wcc — e`+ .d •O al m C -p rn -Co Cu y _� O LU W a Y c C: Cu "O C N Y V Y 7 y Y Ua,} p H E E 2 E o m U 3 CL 3 u-5 CN �z OY Cu C y L a y i 0 0 rn _ a C m c '— Q m m Y Q C p w 0 C O E •- v 0a y O y.2 YO m C X m p_0 L Y cc LL avi a > `c° aiafi m m i vyi c E a7i V) _ Q O C -aFu o m .0 y ... '•' y U U p� C O Y Y < �" ou o °� rn F' L •'' m @ 01m 'U w c C ayi �o v v :CL Q _0 ..2-, rna p CD « 07 Y E m m `-° Y f E m 3 W J Z'A C N C Y m> COL N O y C E Y - 2 •m °• cOi� .Ern DoO.L Q L .0 ami ami 2«.° o O OR 6 -Ea Hoe°vE H v z L=L U m `� m aY' -0 •y m m p_ e o y m w m a� O`W j+L+ C m m.- E"Q .y.,,O E L LL E C c -c,p._ Q C E'o Q m m y d O m C U U L U Y H L 3 'm ��-• c w C N O. d Y C m Y ccv m +�+ 07 L c L Y N p` p 'C O w y ayi C L Y C Q C i O U m 7 m O Y c .Y o_ E m mai Q C Y cVi H m m m 3 G Y ar U j U r > w - d O U y C n m " m E y y 0 E aY' E U 7 y a ,° V) I— a t r w TRANSPORTATION T/9/84 MINOR ARTERIALS The minor arterial system complements and supports the interstate freeway and major arterial systems, but is primarily oriented toward travel within and between adjacent subregions. Minor arterials are generally spaced from one-half mile to two miles apart and typically are two- to four - lane streets in the urban service area and two-lane roads in the rural service area with signals or stop signs at major intersections. Minor arterials are primarily oriented toward the provision of sub - metropolitan mobility and any land access should be oriented to collection and local streets and major traffic generators. Single-family driveways onto minor arterials should be strongly discouraged. Minor arterials are generally not to be continuous across two or more subregions. Minor arterials are also an important component of the transit system providing many of the routes for local transit service. Both design and layout of the minor arterial should reflect this when appropriate. COLLECTOR STREETS The collector system is to be deployed nearly entirely within subregions to provide mobility between communities and neighborhoods. The collector system provides as much for land access as it does for vehicle mobility. The collector system also provides a "collection and distribution" system for the trips coming from or going to minor arterials and thus to the metropolitan highway system. That is, the collector system provides access to commercial, industrial, and high-density residential development, while the metropolitan highways are more oriented toward the "nonstop" portion of trips, sometimes referred to as the. "line -haul" function. Collectors are spaced between major and minor arterials usually from one-quarter mile to one mile apart. Collectors are usually two- or four -lane streets with four-way stop signs and traffic signals at intersections with other collectors and minor arterials. Collectors should not normally provide access directly to interstate freeways. LOCAL STREETS The local street system is deployed continuously through all developed areas to provide for local circulation and direct land access. The local street system is deployed within the grid of streets created by the collector and minor arterial system and comprises the largest percentage of total street mileage. The local street system should be addressed in all local transportation plans. Figure C-1 shows the schematic layout of the functional classes. Figure C-1. ROADWAY SPACING CHARACTERISTICS OF FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 3 erg Not to Scale k 59 C Interstate Freeway ■■w Major Arterial -- Minor Arterial Collector - - - Local ❑ Interchange With No Land Access O Interchanges With Land Access Grade Separation • Signal or Four -Way Stop STREET CITY DEFINITIONS OF FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS I. NEIGHBORHOOD COLLECTORS (30 - 35 MPH) FROM Blue Cross Rd. Blackhawk Rd. - Carnelian Lane -. Rahn Rd. Coachman Rd. Four Oaks Rd. Covington Lane Galaxie Ave. Deerwood-Dr. Denmark Ave. Denmark Ave. Duckwood Dr. Dodd Rd. Rosemount Duckwood Drive Denmark Ave. Elrene Rd. Yankee Doodle Federal Dr. Washington Dr. Four Oaks Rd. T.H. 13 Gold Trail Turquoise Tr. Johnny Cake Ridge Rd. Cliff Rd. Nicols Rd. Kings Rd. Nicols Rd. Minn. River Si 1 verBe l l Road T.H.13 Slater Rd. Cliff Rd. Thomas Lake Rd. Cliff Rd. Turquoise Tr. Rahn Rd. ;Wilderness Run Rd. Pilot Knob Rd. II. COMMUNITY COLLECTORS (35 - 45 MPH) Beau de Rue Dr. Nicols Rd. Blackhawk Rd. Cliff Rd. Cedarvale Blvd. ? Beau De Rue/Nicols Deerwood Dr. Blackhawk Rd. Denmark Ave. Duckwood Dr. Duckwood Dr. Pilot Knob Rd. Galaxie Ave. Apple Valley Johnny Cake Ridge Rd. Apple Valley Nicols Rd. Cliff Rd. O'Neill Dr. T.H. 149 7-23-85 Page 1 of 2 TO Yankee Doodle Rd. Blackhawk Rd. Yankee Doodle Rd E.Beacon Hill Rd Pilot Knob Rd. Deerwood Dr. Wescott Rd. Lexington Ave. Wescott Rd. Blackhawk Hills Rd. Coachman Rd. Beau De Rue Rd. Diffley Rd. Cliff Rd. Silver Bell Rd. Nicols Rd. Burnsville Diffley Rd. Blackhawk Rd. Dodd Rd. Silver Bell Rd. T.H.13 Silver Bell Rd. Pilot Knob Rd. Yankee Doodle Rd Denmark Ave. Cliff Rd. Cliff Rd. Beau De Rue Dr. Inver Grove Hts. (E. Blue Gentian Rd.) Rahn Rd. Cliff Rd. Cedarvale Blvd. Silver Bell Road Blackhawk Rd. T.H. 13 Wescott Rd. Pilot Knob Rd. T.H. 149 16 III. MINOR ARTERIALS (40 - 50 MPH) IV. INTERMEDIATE ARTERIALS (45 - 55 MPH T.H. 13 Burnsville T.H. 55 Mendota Hts. T.H. 77 (Cedar Ave.) Bloomington T.H. 149 Mendota Hts. V. PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS (45 - 55 MPH) I -35E Burnsville I-494 Bloomington Page 2of2 Inver Grove Hts. T.H. 3 T.H. 55 Inver Grove Hts. Mendota Hts. T.H. 149 Rosemount Mendota Hts. T.H.3 Silver Bell Rd. Inver Grove Hts. Apple Valley T.H. 55 Mendota Hts. Inver Grove Hts. Cliff Rd.(Co.Rd.32) Burnsville Diffley Rd. (Co.Rd.30) T.H. 13 Lexington Ave. (Co.Rd. 43) Cliff Rd. Lone Oak Rd. (Co.Rd.26) T.H. 13 •' Pilot Knob Rd.(Co.Rd.31) - Apple Valley Yankee Doodle Rd..(Co.Rd. 28) T.H. 13 T.H. 3 T.'H. 149 T.H. 13 Silver Bell Rd. T.H. 149 T.H. 55 '• IV. INTERMEDIATE ARTERIALS (45 - 55 MPH T.H. 13 Burnsville T.H. 55 Mendota Hts. T.H. 77 (Cedar Ave.) Bloomington T.H. 149 Mendota Hts. V. PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS (45 - 55 MPH) I -35E Burnsville I-494 Bloomington Page 2of2 Inver Grove Hts. T.H. 3 T.H. 55 Inver Grove Hts. Mendota Hts. T.H. 149 Rosemount Mendota Hts. T.H.3 Silver Bell Rd. Inver Grove Hts. Apple Valley T.H. 55 Mendota Hts. Inver Grove Hts. / 99 G 64,,va v Ar Go,otr pc.IN FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR HIGHWAYS MAJOR MiNOR INTER- ON JURISDICTIONAU CROSS CROSS SECTION PRIVATE -STREET IT uLASS FUNCTION CHARACTERISTICS LOCATION SPACING STPEETS STREETS CONTROL ACCESS PARKING RESPONSIBILITY I Principal 'Major inter & In natural 3-6 Separated Termin- Separated None None State Arterial intra regional community miles or some ated i some sig - trips separations. at grade mals 'Connect urban defining de- with Tig- places 6 major velopment 3 _ nals traffic not separat- ' •Serve longest Ing it trips at high level of ser- " vice *Resemble grid pattern 'Continuous II Inter- 'Same as Same as i-3 Separated At grade Separated None None State sediate Principal ex- Principal miles at grade w/ signals Or signals Arterial cept does not or at grade or none Serve inter- w/ signals regional trips III Minor -Intra-county On edges 1 - 3 At grade At grade Signals None None County.or -Arterial 8 some shorter of neigh- miles or some Municipal State Aid inter -county borhoods stop signs *Redium length within trips community 'Continuity within prin- cipal grid system at - minimum 3;. 'Serve county facilities such as parks. etc. 'Connect popu- lation & employ- ment centers within princi- pal grid IV Community *Short trips Within 1/4 to At grade At grade Stop signs Restric- Restric- Local Collector with access Community 2 miles or some ted ted by Govern - to minor signals local went generators ordinance •Collect L distribute ' trips be- ' - tween uses i arterial Systems k V Neighbor- *Access to land Within 1/4 to At Grade At Grade Stop Sign Unr-- Unre- hood *Collect 6 dis- Neighbor- 1 stile stricted stricted Local Collector tribute hood Government neighborhood trips to higher service ar- terial V local *Access to land Within 1 Block -At Grade At Grade Usually Unre- Unre- Local Access •Discontinuous Neighbor- None stricted stricted Government hood 4y' VI -7 DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN CITY & COUNTY FUNCTIONAL HIGHWAY CLASSIFICATIONS Cliff Rd. (Burnsville to 35E) 149 (Mendota Heights - Hwy 55) Lexington Avenue Lone Oak (13 - Pilot Knob) Beau De Rue Drive Denmark Avenue Duckwood Drive O'Neill Drive Silver Bell Road Eagandale Boulevard Wilderness,Run Road Johnny Cake Ridge Road 11 to 3 * No formal definition available L.S.#2 Func.Hwy. CITY Minor Arterial Major Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Community Collector Community Collector Community Collector Community Collector Community Collector Industrial Collector Neighborhood Collector Neighborhood Collector (Cliff to Diffley) Community Collector (Apple Valley to Cliff) January 29, 1987 Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Collector Not/Des. Not/Des. Not/Des. Not/Des. Not/Des. Collector Collector Collector Collector Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Three There are three (3) items on the agenda referred requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. wishes to discuss any of the items in further should be removed from the Consent Agenda Additional Items unless the discussion required PERSONNEL ITEMS to as consent items If the City Council detail, those items and placed under is brief. A. Personnel Items --There are five (5) items to be considered under Personnel Items at this time. 1. Temporary Planning Aide --Marilyn Wucherpfennig, the Planning Aide in the Planning Department, was scheduled for major surgery and has take a medical disability leave of absence from the City due to that disability. Because of the large volume of work in the Planning Department it is necessary to hire a temporary replacement for that position for the period of the disability. Two prospective replacements were interviewed by City Planner Runkle and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Shannon Tyree be hired as a Temporary Planning Aide in the Planning Department. The official replacement period begins January 27, and will end when the disability period is over (approximately 6 weeks). ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Shannon Tyree as a Temporary Planning Aide for the Planning Department. 2. Contractual Sign Inspector --Approximately 25 applications were received by the City from persons interested in serving as a contractual Sign Inspector. After screening these applications, two applicants with professional sign experience and background were invited to the Eagan Municipal Center for an interview. These applicants were interviewed by Acting Chief Building Official Reid, Planner I Sturm and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Donna Rollins be offered the contract as the City's contractual sign inspector. Ms. Rollins has been a professional sign painter and maker. She is also familiar with zoning restrictions and regulations regarding signs in various communities. Ms. Rollins contract would become effective February 4, 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a contract with Donna M. Rollins as the City's contractual Sign Inspector (approximately 20 hours per week) with the contract to become effective February 4, 1987. 1 // Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Four Item 3. Police Secretary --In the 1987 budget, a full-time Secretary was approved for the Police Department. Approximately 25 applications were received for this position. After screening the applications, six applicants were invited to -the Municipal Center for written and typing tests and an interview. At that time, one applicant withdrew her application. The remaining five were tested and interviewed by Chief of Police Berthe, Office Manager Knight and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Linda Bendt be hired to fill the Police Secretary position, effective February 2, 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Linda Bendt as the Police Secretary, effective February 2, 1987. Item 4. Police Clerk Typist --Since Linda Bendt is currently one of the part-time Clerk Typists in the Police Department, it will be necessary to advertise for a replacement for this position. The position entails approximately 20 hours per week on an average. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the advertisement for a replacement for the part-time Police Clerk -Typist position. 5. Part -Time Police Dispatcher --Approximately 20 applications were received for this vacant position. After screening, nine applicants were invited to the Eagan Municipal Center for written and typing tests. Of these nine applicants, only six applicants actually appeared to take the tests. These six applicants were subsequently interviewed by Chief of Police Berthe, Office Manager Knight, Dispatcher Kathy Bartell, Dispatcher Eileen Zimmerman and Administrative Assistant Duffy on Thursday, January 29, 1987. It is their recommendation that Lynn Lipinski-Pesek be hired for this position, contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical and psychological examination requirements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Lynn Lipinski-Pesek for the part-time Police Dispatcher position, contingent upon the successful completion of the City's physical and psychological examination requirements, effective February 3, 1987. M Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Five APPROVE PURCHASE OF VEHICLES #113 & 124 B. Approve Purchase of Vehicles #113 & 124 (Dump Trucks) Through Hennepin County Bid --The approved 1987 budget provided for the replacement of existing unit #121 (Wabco Motor Grader) with a single axle dump truck with front, side and under body plows. It also approved the reaplacement of unit #11 (Tandem Axle Dump Truck) with a like piece of equipment, incorporating an under body plow. The City of Eagan was able to purchase these vehicles through the Cooperative Hennepin County Bid Purchase Program, for a cost of $39,520 and $51,201 respectively. This purchase provides for the acquisition of a cab and chassis only. With the estimated cost to install the required hydraulics, dump box, front, side and under body plows and sander, at $25,000, the resulting cost of acquisition will be $64,520 and $76,201 respectively. This compares to a budget of $65,000 and $75,000 respectively. Through the combined purchase of both vehicles for a cost of $90,721, we will be within $700 of the approved 1987 budget. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the acquisition of Vehicles #113 (Single Axle Dump Truck) and Vehicle #124 (Tandem Axle Dump Truck) through the Hennepin County Bid Purchase Program for a total of $90,721. 7/ Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Six APPROVE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT 1987 TRAFFIC LANE STRIPING C. Approve Joint Powers Agreement for 1987 Traffic Lane Striping -- As in past years, the staff is requesting authorization to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with the cities of Burnsville, Apple Valley, Lakeville and Savage for our traffic lane striping. The city of Burnsville coordinates the Joint Powers Agreement in preparing plans and specifications for singular bid. Through these increased quantities, all cities have been successful in obtaining much better rates. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve the Joint Powers Agreement for the 1987 traffic lane striping. 7;— Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Seven PROJECT 486,__E -Z AIR PARK - STORM SEWER A. Public Hearing for Project 486, E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer --In response to a petition submitted by the developer for the proposed expansion of the E -Z Air Park, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility -report which was completed and presented to the Council on January 6, with the formal public hearing to discuss these improvements scheduled for February 3. Enclosed on pages_ through is a copy of that feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. Several meetings have been held with the affected property owners regarding the proposed alignment, easement acquisition and related assessments. There are some concerns expressed by Contract Beverages and K.W. McKee Company to this project and these will be further addressed during staff's presentation. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed or affected by this construction. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 486 (E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detail plans and specifications and acquisition of necessary easements. z3 REPORT E - Z AIR PARK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 486 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 9 FILE No. 49406 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA l� Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612-636.4600 January 2, 1987 O Engineers & Architects Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: E -Z Air Park Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 486 File No. 49406 Dear Mayor and Council: Ono G. Bonestroo, P.E. Robert W. Rosen, P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner, P.E. James C. Man, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keith A. Gordon, Y.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. Richard W. Faster. P.E. Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. Marvin L. Survala, P.E. Donald C. Burgordr, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T. Routmann, P.E. Hubert R. Pfefferle, P.E. David O. Laskolit, P.E. Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. Michael C. Lynch. P.E. Kann L. Willis, P.E. James R. Malond. P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson. P.E. Keith A. Bachmann, P.E. Murk R. Rolfs, P.E. Robert C. Rwmk. A.I.A. Thomas E. Angus, P.E. Scull L. Young. P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawrlsky Harlon M. Olson Susan M. Eberin Enclosed is our report for E -Z Air Park, Project No. 486. This report covers storm sewer improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at.a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONEST 00 ROS NE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mar A. Hanson MAH/ aes I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registe ed Profe sional Engineer under the laws of thStte o Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: January 2,_198 Approved by: j Department of Public Works Date: 1331e Yea r Anniversary Reg. No. 14260 SCOPE: This project provides for storm sewer improvements for E -Z Air Park. E -Z Air Park is located east of Lexington Avenue and south of the Chicago Milwaukee Railroad near T.H. No. 55. E -Z Air Park provides for parking and a shuttle service between the airport and their parking facility. E -Z Air Park is proposing to expand their existing parking facility by approximately seven (7) acres requiring storm sewer improvements. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Storm Sewer Plan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Storm water runoff from the existing E -Z Air Park facility is presently discharged into a shallow open ditch located along the south side of the Chicago Milwaukee Railroad. Storm water is further conveyed through an existing 36 inch CMP located beneath the railroad tracks east of the E -Z Air Park facility and is discharged north into an overland drainage swale located in the large parking area east of the K. W. McKee Inc. building. The runoff is then discharged into an open ditch along T.H. No. 55 into two - 54 inch equivalent arch pipes beneath T.H. No. 55 which discharges to an open ditch to Pond FP -1. The drainage area located south of the Chicago Milwaukee Railroad discharging through the existing 36 inch CMP is 69 acres of which 15 acres is included in E -Z Air Park. 9 Storm sewer proposed herein is shown on the drawing located at the back of this report. As noted, the proposed storm sewer alignment does not follow the existing overland drainage alignment. In an effort to provide a more economi- cal storm sewer system it is recommended the storm sewer be constructed bet- ween the K. W. McKee Inc. westerly building and Contract Beverages, Inc. This alignment also enables runoff to be collected in the loading dock area located between the two buildings and conveyed directly to the two arch culverts 133le Page 1. beneath T.H. No. 55. Presently, the runoff collected in the loading dock area must percolate through two sump manholes. South of the Chicago Milwaukee Railroad the storm sewer system is designed to convey only that runoff genera- ted from and between the E -Z Air Park facility and -Lexington Avenue (approxi- mately 45 acres). The remaining 24 acres will continue to run through the existing 36 inch CMP and east of the K. W. McKee Inc. building. Therefore, any future storm sewer improvements required in this area would be constructed within the existing swale located east of the K. W. McKee Inc. and would be capable of conveying the 24 acres located south of the Chicago Milwaukee Rail- road. EASEMENTS AND PERMITS: Permanent and temporary easements are required from E -Z Air Park and Contract Beverages, Inc. Permits will be required from the Chicago Milwaukee Railroad to jack or auger storm sewer beneath their tracks and from Mn/DOT to discharge into their ditch along T.H. 55. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 2 Lot 6 ROBERT O'NEILL HOMESTEAD Part of Lots 7 and 8 - Parcel 081-00 Contract Beverages, Inc. Part of Lots 7 and 8 - Parcel 082-00 K. W. McKee COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $199,040, which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated wih easement acquisition. Overhead costs are estimated at 30 percent and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. Page 2. 133le ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefitted property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. Trunk area storm sewer for this area has been previously assessed as part of Project 302 and,383. It is proposed to assess lateral storm sewer based on the benefit received for storm sewer constructed within that parcel. E -Z Air Park is proposed to be assessed for that lateral storm sewer which is con- structed adjacent to the Chicago Milwaukee Railroad and 50 percent of the jacking cost. It is also proposed to assess an 18 inch lateral equivalent for that storm sewer constructed within the loading dock area between K. W. McKee Inc. and Contract Beverages, Inc. and an 18 inch equivalent for that storm sewer constructed from the loading dock area to the ditch along T.H. No. 55. It is assumed for purposes of this report that the bituminous removal and patching will not be included in the lateral assessment for storm sewer. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Storm Sewer $199,040 - Lateral Assessment $57,310 $199,040 $57,310 $-141,730 The anticipated project deficit for this project is $-141,730. 1331e Page 3. 79 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibilty Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing 133le Page 4. 71 . December 16, 1986 February 3, 1987 April 1987 May 1987 August 1987 September 1987 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE E -Z AIR PARK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 486 100 Lin.Ft. 48" RCP arch storm sewer in place @ $90/L.F. $ 9,000 310 Lin.Ft. 48" RCP storm sewer in place @ $70/L.F. 21,700 100 Lin.Ft. 36" RCP arch storm sewer in place @ $80/L.F. 8,000 370 Lin.Ft. 33" RCP storm sewer in place @ $46/L.F. 17,020 50 Lin.Ft. Jack or auger 33" RCP storm sewer in place @ $200/L.F. 10,000 320 Lin.Ft. 30" RCP storm sewer in place @ $40/L.F. 12,800 350 Lin.Ft. 24" RCP storm sewer in place @ $32/L.F. 11,200 150 Lin.Ft. 18" RCP storm sewer in place @ $26/L.F. 3,900 5 Each Std. 4' diameter manhole with casting @ $1,000/each 5,000 2 Each Std. 6' diameter manhole with casting @ $1,500/each 3,000 2 Each Std. CB with casting @ $800/each 1,600 6 Cu.Yd. Rip Rap @ $50/cu.yd. 300 1,800 Sq.Yd. Remove bituminous pavement @ $2/sq.yd. 33%600 1,800 Sq.Yd. Bituminous mixture for patch @ $20/sq.yd. 36,000 200 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $7/ton 1,400 0.7 Acre Seed with topsoil and mulch @ $1,000/acre 700 300 Sq.Yd. Sod with topsoil @ $2/sq.yd. 600 $145,820 +5% Contingencies __L,290 $153,110 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 453,930 TOTAL $199,040 1331e Page 5. 36 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL E -Z AIR PARK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 486 PARCEL DESCRIPTION TOTAL ASSESSMENT Ea andale Center Industrial Park No. 2 Lot 6 $ 33,420 Robert O'Neill Homestead - Part of Lot 7 K. W. McKee Inc. - Parcel 082-00 $ 11,945 Contract Beverages, Inc. - Parcel 081-00 11,945 $ 57,310 133le Page 6. 3/ J 11 10 vort E9 6 �6 6A 01 ON 4 0 3 2 1 12 13 12 11 10 9 6 7 6 S 4 3 2 t 15 16 1 }Q N t9 19 20 21 22 2! 24 25 26 2T 26 29 3C 17 BEATRICE STREET � It 10 vort E9 6 �6 6A 01 ON 4 0 3 2 1 12 10 8 2 7 6 3 4 0 3 2 1 n BEATRICE STREET � 14 13 12 11 10 9 9 7 6 S 4-1� 2 1 W 0 N W 13 - 12 II 10 8 ! 7 6 S 4 3 2 1 Q 14 z McKEE STREET 0 z X W J II 10 vort E9 6 2V 6A 01 ON 4 0 3 2 1 12 10 8 9 7 6 3 4 0 3 2 1 n dKEEFE STREET 11 10 J?A" B 37 6 DS 4 ® I 2 1 IS2-00 I LEXINGTON PARK 062.00 CRY OF EAGAN E - Z AIR PARK PROJECT No. 466 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA sr4TF r ( IN41 EInSrWIN , . T 010-29 ! HpARCN EXISTING c• SARC.1 E_NT � OVERLAND DRAINAGE 1 „d 1 020-29 u R P STORM SEWER e CEIITER OF 9EC. 2 % T. 27, q.23 t Pon s1 ! 1 P+ 7 e 9 ( I 1 I I f \ �� L AIR A ` /HOMESTEAD NSION/O CMP 1 6 £e E G -.G QpL F� pN GroDhic Scow m Feel , 4 BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota LDate: JAN. 1986 1 Comm. 49406 Fig. No. Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eight PROJECT 488, BLACKHAWK ROAD - STREET IMPROVEMENTS B. Public Hearing For Project 488, Blackhawk Road - Street Improvements --As a condition of the approval of the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center in the northeast corner of Blackhawk Road and Diffley Road, the developer submitted a petition requesting the upgrading of Blackhawk Road from Diffley Road to the northern limits of their addition. Subsequently, the Council authorized the preparation of the feasibility report which was presented on January 6, with the formalpu lic hearing being scheduled for February 3. Enclosed on pages through � is copy of that report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. The intersection improvements adjacent to Diffley Road are necessary to handle the traffic volumes proposed to be generated by the Blackhawk Plaza development. With the recent completion of the upgrading of Deerwood Drive connecting Blackhawk Road with Pilot Knob Road, the staff projects continually increasing traffic on Blackhawk Road, necessitating the completion of the full width improvement up to Deerwood Drive. The scope and impact of this project will be discussed in further detail by the staff during the public hearing presentation. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed or impacted by the construction proposal. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify/deny Project 488 ( Blackhawk Road - Street Improvements) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detail plans and specifications and acquisition of necessary easements. 33 REPORT FOR BLACKHAWK ROAD (DIFFLEY ROAD TO DEEftW00D DRIVE STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT No. 488 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA p 1986 File No. 49409 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 311 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 December 23, 1986 Engineers & Architects Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Blackhawk Road (Diffley Road to Deerwood Drive) Street and Utility Improvements Project No. 488 File No. 49409 Dear Mayor and Council: Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. Robert W. Rosen, Y.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, Y.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner, P.E. James C. Olson, P.E. Gknn R. Cook, P.E. Keith A. Gordon, Y.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. Rkhard W. Faster, P.E. Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. Marvin L. Sorvala. P.E. Donald C. Burgardt, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson. P.E. Ted K. Fuld, P.E. Michael T. Rautmenn, P.E. Robert R. PJeJJrrle, P. E. David O. Laskolu, P.E. Thomas W. Peterson. P.E. Michael C. Lynch. P.E. Kann L. Willis, P.E. James R. Maland, P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. Keith A. Bachmann, P.E. Murk R. Rolls, P.E. Robert C. Russek. A.LA. Thomas E. Angus, P.E. Scott L. Young, P.E. Charles A. Erkkson Leo M. Pawrlsky Harlan M. Olson Susan M. Eberlin Enclosed is our report for Blackhawk Road (Diffley Road to Deerwood Drive), Project No. 488. This report covers utility and street improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00 RO�ENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH/aes I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer ' under the laws of tt),6 St to o Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson 7 Dote: December 23, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: �22c-t�c.tr'7 /r (_�Y Department of Public Works Date: /, - Z -a ` 1260e SCOPE: This project provides for the upgrading of Blackhawk Road from Diffley Road (Dakota County Road 30) north to Deerwood Drive. Also included is the construction of storm sewer. Within the project area Blackhawk Road is abut- ted by a combination of residential and commercial property and several un - platted and undeveloped parcels. Blackhawk Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid Street within the City. Therefore the plans and specifications will be prepared in accordance with Municipal State Aid Standards and will be submitted to Mn/DOT for review and approval. 1 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project as outlined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City. The project can be best carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Storm Sewer: Storm sewer includes two separate lateral systems and catch basin connections to existing lines. The majority of the work will be located along the east side of Blackhawk Road as shown on the attached drawing. The southerly line will provide an outlet for storm water from a low area on the east side of the intersection of Blackhawk Road and Kathryn Circle and for storm water from a ponding area within Blackhawk Plaza. This line would 3 be connected to existing storm sewer at the northeast corner of Blackhawk Road and Diffley Road. The northerly line will provide an outlet for storm water from a low area between Kathryn Circle and South Meadowlark Road along with the collection of storm water at the intersection of Blackhawk Road and South Meadowlark Road. Page 1. 1260e ,36 This portion of the system would be connected to an existing storm sewer at the southeast corner of Meadowlark Road and Blackhawk Road. In addition to these systems, catch basins are proposed where appropriate along Blackhawk Road to collect runoff from streets and yards. Due to exist- ing street and yard grades, field type catch basins will be required at the northwest and southwest corners of Kathryn Circle. Street: The street construction, as proposed, includes the upgrading of Blackhawk Road to a 9 ton design thickness and a 44' width north of Kathryn Circle. Between Diffley Road and the entrance to Blackhawk Plaza, it is pro- posed to upgrade the road to a 74' width which would include a left turn lane and center island at the intersection with Diffley Road. From Blackhawk Plaza to Kathryn Circle, the road would be tapered back to the proposed 44' width. A sketch of the intersection is shown on the attached drawing. Eight foot wide bituminous trailways are proposed along both sides of Blackhawk Road to Carnelian Lane. From Carnelian Lane to Deerwood Drive, the trailway would be located only on the east side. Under City Project No. 25, the road was graded to accommodate future im- provements to a 44' width but did not include a width sufficient to accommo- date construction of trailways. In addition the street was constructed with both a rural section, including gravel shoulders and ditches, and an urban section with concrete curb gutter to the full half width of 22'. The section with curb and gutter is located along the west side from Deerwood Drive to the south side of Carnellian Park. Because of the previous improvements to Blackhawk Road, the proposed grad- ing will be limited to filling and cutting slopes and filling ditches to ac- commodate the proposed trailways. In addition a limited amount of excavation will be required to widen the road to 74' in the area previously mentioned. 1260e Page 2. . 3, Grading to change vertical and horizontal alignments will not be required since the existing road meets current MSA requirements for grade and alignment. Grading will require resloping of existing yards, transplanting of trees and shrubs, and reconstruction of portions of driveways. If temporary con- struction easements cannot be obtained for regrading, either portions of trail - ways will need to be eliminated from the project or retaining walls will need to be constructed. The typical section for the roadway will require a 2.5" overlay of exist- ing bituminous street. In order to maintain the same street cross slope and curb elevations, it is proposed to replace the existing concrete curb and gut- ter to accommodate the overlay. In areas of existing gravel shoulders, suffi- cient gravel will be removed to allow for the placement of curb and gutter and a 4.5" bituminous surface. EASEMENTS AND PERMITS: Right-of-way and temporary construction easements are required to allow for the construction of trailways. It is proposed that a minimum 40' half right-of-way be acquired in areas of exiting 33' right-of- way. In areas where the proposed street width is 74', a minimum 50' half right-of-way is proposed to be acquired. In addition, temporary construction easements will be required to allow for the construction of proper slopes from the widened right-of-way., The estimated amount of right-of-way and temporary construction easement required from each parcel is listed below: Page 3. 1260e PARCEL DESCRIPTION SE 1/4, SECTION 20: Parcel 011-75 Parcel 040-75 Parcel 030-77 Parcel 040-77 Parcel 010-78 Parcel 020-78 Parcel 030-78 Parcel 030-79 Parcel 040-79 Parcel 050-79 Parcel 070-79 Parcel 010-80 ART RAHN FIRST ADDITION: TEMPORARY RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT (Acre) (Acre) 0.13 0.05 0.23 0.02 -- 0.01 -- 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.35 0.04 0.03 0.10 0.11 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 -- 0.06 -- Lot 1 -- 0.02 Lot 14 -- 0.03 Lot 15 0.01 0.03 TOTAL 0.48 1.01 Permits will be required from lin/DOT and Dakota County for construction at the intersection of Diffley and Blackhawk Roads. COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized below: Storm Sewer $ 89,090 Street 292,890 TOTAL $3813980 The total estimated project cost is $381,980 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right- of-way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are estimated at 30 percent and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. Page 4. 1260e -3� ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the public hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Construction Area SE 1/4, Section 20 Parcel 011-75 Parcel 040-75 Parcel 010-77 Parcel 030-77 Parcel 040-77 Parcel 010-78 Parcel 020-78 Parcel 030-78 Parcel 030-79 " Parcel 040-79 Parcel 050-79 Parcel 070-79 Parcel 010-80 Blackhawk Plaza Lot 1, Block 1 Outlot A Art Rahn First Addition Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 14, Block i Lot 15, Block 1 Hillandale 1st Addition Lot 1, Block 2 Lot 1, Block 1 Hillandale 2nd Addition Outlot A Blackhawk Woods Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 3, Block 1 Cedar Grove No. 7 Lot 12, Block 7 Lot 13, Block 7 Lot 14, Block 7 Lot 14, Block 8 Lot 15, Block 8 Lot 12, Block 9 Lot 13, Block 9 1260e Page 5. no: Assessment Area SE 1/4, Section 20 Parcel 011-75 Parcel 040-75 Parcel 030-77 Parcel 040-77 Parcel 010-78 Parcel 020-78 Parcel 030-78 Parcel 030-79 Parcel 040-79 Parcel 050-79 Parcel 070-79 Parcel 010-80 Blackhawk Plaza Lot 1, Block 1 Art Rahn First Addition Lo.t 14, Block 1 Lot 15, Block 1 Hillandale No. 1 Lot 1, Block 2 Lot 1, Block 1 Blackhawk Woods Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 3, Block 1 Storm Sewer: Storm sewer proposed herein is to be assessed as trunk and lat- eral. It is proposed to assess for trunk area those benefitting parcels not previously assessed. It is proposed to assess benefitting parcels for lateral storm sewer on a front foot basis at the current equivalent zoning assessment rate and Lot 1, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza on a lump sum rate. Lot 1, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza is responsible for 100% of a 12" storm sewer from their pond to the existing storm sewer at the intersection of Blackhawk and Diffley Roads. The estimated cost of the 12" storm sewer is $12,450 and is the proposed lump sum assessment. As a condition of final plat approval, the lump sum assessment includes the assumption of the lateral storm sewer assessment for Outlot A, Blackhawk Plaza and Parcel 010-80. Oversizing of storm sewer will be financed by the City through lateral benefit assess- ments to the remaining benefiting parcels. Corner lot credits of 75' will be applied in accordance with Assessment Policy 86-3. Large unplatted parcels (011-75, 040-75, 010-78, 020-78, 030-78 and 030-79) will be assessed based on 100' of front footage in accordance with Assessment Policy 86-3. Trunk storm sewer and lateral storm sewer equivalent assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: Trunk Area: Single Family/Agricultural $0.053/S.F. Lateral Equivalent: $10.30/F.F. Street: The street improvements to Blackhawk Road are proposed to be assessed to those parcels (platted and unplatted) which do not front on existing con- crete curb and gutter. Each parcel is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis in accordance with Assessment Policy 86-3 based on the cost to upgrade Blackhawk Road to an equivalent street standard based on each parcel's zoning Page 6. 1260e . 1P (residential - 32' wide and multiple - 44' wide). However, as a condition of final plat approval, Lot 1, Block 1, Blackhawk Plaza will pay for all costs associated with upgrading one-half of Blackhawk Road from its north line to Diffley Road (County Road 30). The anticipated project cost for these im- provements including trailway is $39,000 and is the proposed lump sum assess- ment. Trailway is proposed to be assessed against multiple and commercial par- cels based on actual project cost across the front of each multiple or commer- cial parcel. The same corner lot credits and large unplatted parcel credits as applied for storm sewer will be applied for street and trailway assess- ments. Final assessment rates will be based on actual bid unit prices and project costs. The computed rates for residential and multiple parcels are as follows: Residential: $15.98/F.F. Multiple: $33.98/F.F. (includes trailway) REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Storm Sewer Project Cost Revenue Balance Trunk $ 11,254 Lateral $ 89,090 22,372 3 $ 89,090 $ 33,626 -$ 55,464 Street & Trailwav Street Lateral $292,890 $ 73,892 $292,890 $ 73,892 $218,998 TOTAL ................... -$274,462 The anticipated project deficit is $274,462. This amount will be financed in part from the major street and storm sewer funds. 1260e Page 7. �Z 1260e PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 8. 9AM January 6, 1987 February 3, 1987 April, 1987 May/June, 1987 Fall 1987 Spring, 1988 May, 1989 ADnWMnTV A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE BLACKHAWK ROAD UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 488 A) STORM SEWER 800 Lin.ft. 21" RCP storm sewer @ $30.00/l.f. $24,000.00 630 Lin.ft. 12" RCP storm sewer @ $22.00/1.f. 13,860.00 20 Lin.ft. Salvage & relay 18" RCP storm sewer @ $18.00/l.f. 360.00 9 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/ea. 9,900.00 4 Each Std. CBMH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/ea. 4,000.00 7 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/ea. 5,600.00 2 Each Field CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/ea. 1,600.00 1 Each 12" Flared End Section w/TG @ $500.00/ea. 500.00 1 Each Cut -in to CB @ $500.00/ea. 500.00 2 Each Cut -in to storm sewer @ $200.00/ea. 400.00 1 Each Relocate CB @ $500.00/ea. 500.00 2 Each Salvage and relay flared end @ $300.00/ea. 600.00 2 Each Change CBMH to MH @ $250.00/ea. 500.00 2 Each Remove flared end @ $200.00/ea. 400.00 10 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $60.00/c.y. 600.00 50 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/c.y. 500.00 1,450 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/l.f. 1,450.00 Subtotal $65,270.00 + 5% Contingencies 3,264.00 $68,534.00 1260e +30% Legal, Eng., Admin. & Bond Interest 20,556.00 TOTAL ................................ $89,090.00 Page 9. . A4 APPENDIX A (CONT'D) B) STREET & TRAILWAYS LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $2,000.00/L.S. $ 2,000.00 4,500 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $2.00/c.y. 9,000.00 3,000 Cu.yds. Common borrow @ $3.00/c.y. 9,000.00 1,700 Sq.yds. Bituminous street removal @ $1.00/s.y. 1,700.00 1,960 Lin.ft. Concrete curb & gutter removal @ $1.50/l.f. 2,940.00 150 Lin.ft. Culvert removal @ $2.00/l.f. 300.00 2 Each Relocate Hydrant @ $500.00/ea. 1,000.00 4,500 Sq.yds. Subbase preparation @ $0.50/s.y. 2,250.00 1,380 Ton Class 3 aggregate subbase @ $3.00/ton 4,140.00 920 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $5.00/ton 4,600.00 1,900 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (trailway) @ $5.00/ton 9,500.00 880 Ton Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton 9,680.00 1,470 Ton Bituminous binder course @ $12.00/ton 17,640.00 530 Ton Bituminous wear course (driveways/trailways) @ $15.00/ton 7,950.00 980 Ton Bituminous wear course (2361) @ $18.00/ton 17,640.00 245 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $140.00/ton 34,300.00 1,620 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 2,430.00 6,300 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.50/l.f. 34,650.00 500 Lin.ft. Concrete valley gutter @ $10.00/l.f. 5,000.00 300 Lin.ft. Reinforcing for concrete curb & gutter @ $0.50/l.f. 150.00 2,900 Sq.ft. Concrete Island @ $1.50/sq.ft. 4,350.00 12 Each Adjust MH & CB frame @ $200.00/ea. 2,400.00 10 Each Adjust valve box @ $150.00/ea. 1,500.00 LUMP SUM Transplant exist. trees & shrubs @ $5,000.00/L.S. 5,000.00 600 Lin.ft. Salvage & reinstall fence @ $3.00/l.f. 1,800.00 800 Cu.yds. Topsoil borrow @ $8.00/c.y. 6,400.00 10,000 Sq.yds. Sodding @ $1.50/s.y. 15,000.00 1.5 Ac. Seeding w/fertilizer & mulch @ $1,500.00/ac. 2,250.00 Subtotal $214,570.00 + 5% Contingencies 10,729.00 $225,299.00 +30% Legal, Eng., Admin. & Bond Interest 67,591.00 Total $292,890.00 Page 10. 1260e APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BLACKHAWK ROAD UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 488 A) STORM SEWER a) Lateral Storm Sewer Front Assessable Equivalent Parcel Footage Credit Footage Assessment Total Description (F.F.) (F.F.) (F.F.) Rate/F.F. Assessment M, SECTION 20 Parcel 030-77 153.5 53.5(1) 100 $10.30 $ 1,030 Parcel 040-77 83.5 -- 83.5 10.30 860 Parcel 010-78 120.9 20.9(1) 100 10.30 1,030 Parcel 020-78 503.0 403.0(1) 100 10.30 1,030 Parcel 030-78 273.4 173.4(1) 100 10.30 1,030 Parcel 030-79 243.6 143.6(1) 100 10.30 1,030 Parcel 040-79 93.2 -- 93.2 10.30 960 Parcel 050-79 90.3 -- 90.3 10.30 930 BLACKHAWK PLAZA Lot 1, Block 1 -- -- -- -- 12,450(5) ART RAHN FIRST ADDITION Lot 14, Block 1 128.40 75.00(2) 53.40 10.30 550 Lot 15, Block 1 142.89 -- 142.89 10.30 1,472 $22,372 I Page 11. 1260e .Tt� APPENDIX B (CONT'D) b) Trunk Area Storm Sewer Assessable Equivalent Parcel Footage Credit Footage Assessment Total Assessable (F.F.) Parcel Area Credit Assessment Area Total Description (S.F.) (S.F.) (S.F.) Rate/S.F. Assessment SES, SECTION 20 $15.98 $ 1,598 Parcel 040-75 330.2 230.2(1) Parcel 030-77 12,383 -- 030-77 12,383 $0.053 $ 656 Parcel 040-77 2,024 -- 83.5 2,024 0.053 107 Parcel 010-78 36,599 20,099(3) 20.9(1) 16,500 0.053 874 Parcel 020-78 197,421 114,921(3) M 82,500 0.053 4,372 Parcel 030-78 32,182 15,682(3) 15.98 16,500 0.053 874 Parcel 030-79 77,429 44,429(3) 1,598 33,000 0.053 1,749 Parcel 040-79 22,968 6,468(3) Parcel 16,500 0.053 874 Parcel 050-79 20,398 3,898(3) 070-79 16,500 0.053 874 Parcel 010-80 36,543 20,043(3) 16,500 0.053 874 Total $11,254 B) STREET Page 12. 1260e � 7 Front Assessable Equivalent Parcel Footage Credit Footage Assessment Total Description (F.F.) (F.F.) (F.F.) Rate/F.F. Assessment SE14, SECTION 20 Parcel 011-75 281.7 181.7(1) 100 $15.98 $ 1,598 Parcel 040-75 330.2 230.2(1) 100 15.98 1,598 Parcel 030-77 153.5 53.5 100 15.98 1,598 Parcel 040-77 83.5 -- 83.5 15.98 1,334 Parcel 010-78 120.9 20.9(1) 100 15.98 1,598 Parcel 07.0-M) e S')3. ) 7 i.:1` � ) M 13.)3 1,598 Parcel 030-78 273.5 173.4(1) 130 15.98 1,598 Parcel 030-79 243.5 143.6(1) 100 15.98 1,598 Parcel 040-79 93.2 -- 93.2 15.98 1,489 Parcel 050-79 90.3 -- 90.3 15.98 1,443 Parcel 070-79 146.7 75.0(2) 71.7 15.98 1,146 Page 12. 1260e � 7 APPENDIX B (CONT'D) Front Assessable Equivalent Parcel Footage Credit Footage Assessment Total Description (F.F.) (F.F.) (F.F.) Rate/F.F. Assessment BLACKHAWK PLAZA Lot 1, Block 1 -- -- -- -- $ 39,000 (5,6) ART RAHN FIRST ADDITION Lot 14, Block 1 128.40 75.0(2) 53.40 15.98 853 Lot 15, Block 1 142.89 -- 142.89 15.98 2,283 HILLANDALE NO. 1 Lot 1, Block 2 250.47 75.0(2) 175.47 33.98(4) 5,962 Lot 1, Block 1 247.18 75.0(2) 172.18 33.98(4) 5,851 BLACKHAWK WOODS Lot 1, Block 1 66.97 -- 66.97 15.98 1,070 Lot 2, Block 1 .90.00 -- 90.00 15.98 1,438 Lot 3, Block 1 52.38 -- 52.38 15.98 837 Total $ 73,892 (1) Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3 (2) Corner Lot Credit (3) Large Lot Credit Policy (4) Includes Trailway (5) Lump sum assessment based on estimated cost for constructing 12" storm sewer to Diffley Road. (6) Lump sum assessment based on estimated cost for constructing half of street from Diffley Road to north property line. Page 13. 1260e Parcel Description SES, SECTION 20 Parcel 011-75 Parcel 040-75 Parcel 030-77 Parcel 040-77 Parcel 010-78 Parcel 020-78 Parcel 030-78 Parcel 030-79 Parcel 040-79 Parcel 050-79 Parcel 070-79 Parcel 010-80 BLACKHAWK PLAZA Lot 1, Block 1 ART RAHN FIRST ADDITION Lot 14, Block 1 Lot 15, Block 1 HILLANDALE NO. 1 SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BLACKHAWK ROAD UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 488 Storm Sewer Street & Total Lateral $1,030 860 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 960 930 12,450 550 1,472 Lot 1, Block 2 -- Lot 1, Block 1 -- BLACKHAWK WOODS Lot 1, Block 1 -- Lot 2, Block 1 -- Lot 3, Block 1 -- TOTALS $22,372 1260e Trunk Area Trailwav Assessment -- $ 1,598 $ 1,598 -- 1,598 1,598 $ 656 1,598 3,284 107 1,334 2,301 874 1,598 3,502 4,372 1,598 7,000 874 1,598 3,502 -* + 1,749 1,598 4,377 874 1,489 3,323 874 1,443 3,247 -- 1,146 1,146 874 -- 874 -- 39,000 51,450 -- 853 1,403 -- 2,283 3,755 -- 5,962 5,962 -- 5,851 5,851 -- $ 1,070 $ 1,070 -- 1,438 1,438 -- 837 837 $11,254 $73,892 $107,518 Page 14. CEDAR GROW Na a CEDAR GROVE NO. a , ,z 110 1.z DEERWOOD DRIVE _. _..._ ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._:._.._.._.._---.._.._.._.._--- 9 7 1 I I I 1 011-73 10 13 1 I 1 1 I I " 12 F-73 TACONITE TRAIL -------------- � 1 1 �13 1 PROPOSED j STORM SE11FR I I i di9� ©iaI o40 -7S j BLUESTONE jl)Rld�VE I' I I ; 11 -------------- 12 I 2 CARN 14 13 O I LME - 1 -------------i 1 j 1 oe CARNELIAN PARK _ --_ - qRK 6D. ; r 11010-77 * I i Ill PROPOSED STORY SEWER 1 j V� �� S Q ��• I 020-77 o A 78 q�0 1V i 7 A 5 Y CRC E'p4- ---- ------- pL__________-- a ; O k / 010-7a 12 13 14 1 T 1ST 10 11 15 020-78 ? 1 I i 030-79 , / MACKHAWK PLAZA j I O 1 / PROPOSED 0 400 aw 040-79 1 STORY SEWER ; I 1 1 j 050-79 A GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET a f 010-°° DIF.FLEY ROAD '• .._.._ ��._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..-.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._........ _.._.._.._........ _.._........ _.._.._.._.._.._.. 1 1F_1' S1R+ a.IFF " 010-05 (COUNTY ROAD No. 30) THIRD ADD. O 1 1 BLACKHAWK ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 488 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA 50 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: DEC. 1986 Comm. 49409 Fig. NO. 0 CEDAR GROVE No. 6 CEDAR GROVE NO. 8 2 1 IM 12 ®1 to DEERWOOD DRIVE j 9 7 1 I 011-75 END 8' BIT. TRAILWAY I t0 13 I (EAST SIDE) j 1 I END CONSTRUCTION I 11 12 1012-75 TACONITE TRAIL ! I 13 I4 i 1 I i j 601", @16 15 1 040-75 i i BLUESTONE IDRIVE i i I 17 12 I 1 I 1 I 3 i 14 13 j 2 i CARNE IA N I !_• ENO 8' BIT. TRAILWAY Q j 1 Q (WEST SIDE) CARNELIAN PARK _`rye/ _ "EADO A -- Al K RD. 010-77 , 020-77 T R IST ADD 10 It 15 i i / / 30:1 TAPER / 030-79 ' t , I iTRUC110N / 040-79 j OW -79 • n n i �d 6 i ' 010-78 02D•-78 BLACKNAW PLAZA 1Q PROPOSED STREET /// IMPROVEMENTS 8618 CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER 74' F -F B 8616 CURB K' F DIFFLEY ROAD �- BEGIN 6' BIT. TRAILWAY I I' (EASi t HEST SIDES) SUN CUFF A THIRD AMDD. (COUNTY ROAD No. 30) I I I Q II II BLACKHAWK ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 488 STREET IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA J5-/ BONESTR00. ROSENE. ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: DEC. 1986 Comm. 49409 Fig. No. 2 44' F—F p 2W KATHRYN CIRCLE GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET a i 2 13 A T RA N 1ST ADD, j P�� `~ END TAPER ( W. R E. SIDES) i to +t +s 020-78 i BEGIN TAPER (W. SIDE) BEGIN TAPER (E. SIDE) _ !/t i 030-79 � BLACKHAWK PLAZA S' BIT. TRAILWAY i - -- (D i 040-79 `— END CENTER ISLAND 050-79 --- _.. 74' F—F A B' BIT. TRAILWAY I IBEGIN CENTER ISLAND ! i I o 0 oto -so DIFFLEY ROAD SUN CLIFF THIRD ADD. I �— I 010-05 — BLACKHAWK ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 488 STREET IMPROVEMENTS LEFT TURN LANE EAGAN, MINNESOTA �v (COUNTY ROAD No. 30) BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: DEC. 1986 Comm. 49409 Fig. No. 3 CEDAR GROVE No. 6 2 , ' I O I i 14 9 Q I i I I 10 i3 1 I 11 12 I I I I � 1 " 13 14 ' BLUESTONE R1 1s ' I i 11 12 I CEDAR GROVE NO. 6 121/11101 DEERWOOD DRIVE _.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._... i 011-7s I i • i [;;-75] TACONITE TRAIL Oso -75 3 2 CA 14 13 RN ' A A E _ ; ASSESSMENT LEGEND ---------------TRUNK '1 I I O I 1 O � ® (S.F) AREA STORM SEWER ! d� LATERAL STORM SEWER AND i I p� I ° MEgDO STREET (FX.) I CARNELIAN PARK �. �-- ARK R ........... STREET (F.F.) 010-77 / ° - z� 1 020-77 F O O 7 6 s YN CRC E1 *j A 6 O ° > 14 12 13 ' I T .15TH 70 11 � 1 BLACKNAWI( PLAZA J / O I / 040-79 / / 79 ! I A '0 Df'FFLEY ROAD L.._.._.._.._._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._....._.. I SUN f.1,JFF I 010—OS ...— _ TN1Ro ADD. (COUNTY ROAD No. 30) p , BLACKHAWK ROAD CITY PROJECT No. 488 ASSESSEM EN TS EAGAN, MINNESOTA 0 100' MAIOMUM ASSESSMENT PER ASSESSMENT POLICY 66-3 O 73' CORNER LOT CREDIT BONESTR00, ROSENE. ANDERUK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: DEC. 19 Comm. 4940986 FICA. NO. 4 Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Nine PROJECT 492 LONE OAR 2ND ADDITION - STREETS AND UTILITIES C. Public Hearing for Project 492, Lone Oak 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities --In response to a petition submitted by the developers of the Lone Oak 2nd Addition (Northwest Airlines), the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report to discuss the installation of utilities and street improvements along O'Neill Drive to adequately service this proposed development. Subsequently, the feasibility report was completed and presented to the Council on January 6, with the public hearing being scheduled for February 3. Enclosed on pages�is a copy of that report for the Council's information and review during the public hearing presentation. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed or affected by this construction. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify/deny Project 492 (Lone Oak 2nd Addition/Streets and Utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detail plans and specifications and easement acquisition as necessary. 5� FOR LONE OAK SECOND ADDITION (0'NEILL'S DRIVE) STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 492 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1987 FILE No, 49411 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 2515 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 January 2, 1987 Engineers & Architects Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Lone Oak 2nd Addition (O'Neill's Drive) Street and Utility Improvements Project No. 492 File No. 49411 Dear Mayor and Council: Otto G. Boneslroo, P.E. Robert W. Ruane. P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Brad/wd A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner. P.E. James C. Olson, P.E. Gknn R. Cook, P.E. Keith A. Gurdon. Y.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. Richard W. Farter, P.E. Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. Marvin L. SorvaM, P.E. Donald C. Butgardt, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P. E. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field. P.E. Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. Robert R. PJe%Jerle, P.E. Duvid G. Lorkuto, P.E. Thomas W. Peterson, Y.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Kann L. Willis, P.E. James R. Muland. P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson. P.E. Keith A. Bachmann, P.E. Mark R. Rolls P.E. Robert C. Russek, A.J.A. Thomas E. Angus, P.E. Ssrnt L. Young. P.E. Charles A. Erickwn Leo M. Pawebky Harlan M. Olson Susan M. Ebrrhn Enclosed is our report for Lone Oak Second Addition (O'Neills's Drive), Proj- ect No. 492. This report covers utility and street improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas E. Angus TEA/kf I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of_the?Stade d Minnesota. Date: January 2. 1987 Approved by: z�ci" `Department of Public Works 1332e Date: -516 30 Year Anniversary 31 Reg. No. 14260 SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of the portion of O'Neill's Drive between T.H. 149 and the City of Inver Grove Heights that was not recon- structed by Mn/DOT as part of the I-494 construction under City Project Nos. 349 and 416. Also included is the construction of trunk water main to serve Lone Oak Second Addition, water services, sanitary sewer to serve Auditor's Subdivision No. 31 (Ames Estate) and storm sewer. The majority of the area to be served by these improvements is industrial/ commercial with the remaining agricultural and a small portion residential. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project as outlined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City. The project can be best carried out as one contract. TTCnTTCCT(%M- Sanitary Sewer - The proposed sanitary sewer will extend from Lone Oak Parkway east along the south side of O'Neill's Drive to the eastern side of Auditor's Subdivision No. 31. The extension will consist of an 8" line and provide ser- vice to the property immediately south of O'Neill's Drive. Water Main - The proposed water main involves the construction 'of a 12" trunk main to serve the project area. A recent analysis of the trunk water system area determined that to provide the proper fire flow and supply; a 12" main is required. This size will also accommodate water demands for future planned development within the northeast corner of Section 1. Properties being served will experience static and residual pressures of approximately 78 and 68 psi, respectively, at elevation 874. In addition a pressure of 60 psi based on a fire flow condition of 1250 gpm will be provided to the Northwest Aerospace Training Center which meets the requirements provided by the insurance car- riers for the new facility. e 1. 1332e 7 The line is proposed to be constructed along T.H. 149 from Northwest Park- way to O'Neill's Drive then east to the east side of Lone Oak Second Addi- tion. From this point, it would extend south along the east side of Lone Oak Second Addition and terminate on the south line of the addition as shown on the attached drawing. Looping of the line is proposed to be accomplished by the developers of the property to the south during 1987. If this looping is not accomplished in a timely manner, the main will be looped by extending an 8" main between the Northwest Aerospace Training Center and Northwest World Headquarters. Water Service - It is proposed to provide water services to five existing homes at the intersection of T.H. 149 and O'Neill's Drive and to an existing building within Parcel 010-28. The services would be 1" diameter. Storm Sewer - Storm sewer is proposed to be constructed within O'Neill's Drive to collect street runoff and a small amount of runoff from adjoining land. The storm sewer would consist of 15" and 18" pipe and outlet into Pond FP -4 within Lone Oak Second Addition. Street - Street construction as proposed would involve the construction of a 9 ton road to a 40' width. The construction would connect the east and west ends of O'Neill's Drive that have recently been constructed as a part of Mn/DOT's I-494 project. EASEMENTS & PERMITS: Right-of-way, permanent utility easements, and temporary construction easements are required to allow for the construction of the street and water main. It is proposed that a minimum 40' half right-of-way be acquired in areas of existing 33' half right-of-way. In addition, temporary construction easements will be required to allow for the construction of prop- er slopes from the widened right-of-way. Page 2. 1332e zoa I Additional permanent utility and temporary construction easements will be required to allow for the construction of the water main along the west side Of Outlot N, Lone Oak Addition. The estimated amount of right-of-way, perma- nent utility easement, and temporary construction easement required from each parcel is listed below: Parcel Descri tion NWS, SECTION 1 Parcel 010-25 Parcel 010-26 Parcel 010-27 Parcel 010-29 LONE OAK ADDITION Outlot N TOTAL Street Right-of-way (Acre) 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.12 0.21 Permanent Utility Easement (Acre) 0.19 0.19 Temporary Construction Easement (Acre) 0.05 0.03 1.70 1.78 A permit from Mn/DOT will be required for construction of utilities and street along T.H. 149 and O'Neill's Drive within I-494 right-of-way. COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized below: Sanitary Sewer $ 30,740 Water Main 362,090 Water Service 4,060 Storm Sewer 66,320 Street 241,910 TOTAL .................. $705,120 The total estimated project cost is $705,120 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right- of-way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and in- clude legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. Page 3. 1332e �y ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited prop- erties. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. Assessments for sanitary sewer, water services, and storm sewer will be based on final project costs. Assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing 's AREA TO BE INCLUDED: .Construction Area Assessment Area Lone Oak Addition Lone Oak Addition Outlot A Outlot A Outlot N Outlot N Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 1 Lone Oak 2nd Addition Lone Oak 2nd Addition Outlot A Outlot A Outlot B Outlot B Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 1 O'Neill's First Addition O'Neill's First'Addition Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 3, Block 1 Lot 3, Block 1 Lot 4, Block 1 Lot 4, Block 1 NW -4, SECTION 1 NWS, SECTION 1 Auditor's Subdivision No. 31 Auditor's Subdivision No. 31 Parcel 010-01 Parcel 030-01 Parcel 030-01 Parcel 010-02 Parcel 010-02 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 020-04 Parcel 020-04 Parcel 010-25 Parcel 010-25 Parcel 010-26 Parcel 010-26 Parcel 010-27 Parcel 010-27 Parcel 010-29 . Parcel 010-29 AREA TO BE INCLUDED CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. Page 4. 1332e NWS, SECTION 1. The Robert O'Neill Homestead Parcel 088-00 NW14, SECTION 1 The Robert O'Neill Homestead Parcel 088-00 NE14, -SECTION 1 Parcel 010-02 Sanitary ewer - Sanitary sewer is proposed to be assessed entirely to the property that -it abuts based on the total construction cost of the line.. Water Main - The 12" water main is considered to be a trunk main. Therefore, it is proposed to assess benefiting properties at the rate for lateral benefit from trunk water main. Corner lot credits would be applied to assessable footages. Since there are no benefiting parcels west of T.H. 149 and north of O'Neill's Drive, the full centerline assessment rate is proposed to be applied to those parcels abutting these roads. It is also proposed to assess trunk 'area water main to those parcels not previously assessed. Pond credits will be applied to parcels with ponds or parcels where ponding is proposed. A 20% future road right-of-way credit will be applied to unplatted parcels that are larger than 3 acres and Outlot N, Lone Oak Addition. Water Services - The services are proposed to be assessed to each of the bene- fiting parcels based on the total construction cost. Storm Sewer - Storm sewer is proposed to be assessed as lateral based on the total construction cost. There is no trunk storm sewer being constructed as a part of this project and therefore there are no proposed assessments for trunk storm sewer. A trunk storm sewer assessment will be levied against Lone Oak Second Addition as a part of the development contract with the City of Eagan. Street - Street is _proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis to all bene- fiting parcels (platted and unplatted) based on the current equivalent zoning rates. 1332e Page 5. �l� ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk, lateral, and street assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: Lateral Benefit from Trunk Main Single Family $24.94/Centerline Foot Commercial & Industrial $41.10/Centerline Foot Trunk Water Main Oversizing Agricultural $13,250.00/Acre Residential $600.00/lot Street Agricultural Equivalent $35.44/Front Foot Commercial/Industrial Equivalent $82.37/Front Foot REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue Sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: SANITARY SEWER Lateral Lateral Assessment WATER MAIN Trunk Lateral Benefit from Trunk a Trunk Area WATER SERVICE Lateral Lateral Assessment Project Cost Revenue Balance $ 30,740 $ 30,740 $ 30,740 $ 30,740 - 0 - $362,090 $263,475 313,974 $362,090 $577,449 +$215,359 $ 4,060 $ 4,060 Page 6: 1332e �Y $ 4,060 $ 4,060 -0- Project Cost Revenue Balance STORM SEWER Lateral $ 66,320 , Lateral Assessment $ 66,320 $ 66,320 $-66,320 -0- STREET Street $241,910 Assessment $134,474 $241,910 $134,474 -$107,436 TOTAL BALANCE ............. +$107,923 The anticipated project surplus is $107,923. Deficits, as noted above for streets, will be financed in part from the Major Street Fund. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report January 6, 1987 Public Hearing February 3, 1987 Approve Plans and Specifications Spring, 1987 Open Bids/Award Contract May/June 1987 Construction Completion October, 1987 Final Assessment Hearing Winter, 1988 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1989 1332e Page 7. 45 Z APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION (0'NEILL'S DRIVE) UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 492 A.) SANITARY SEWER Sq.yds. Remove bituminous street @ $2.00/sq.yd. 1,100 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 10'-20' dp. in pl. @ $16.00/l.f. $ 17,600 3 Each STd. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $ $900.00/each 1,200 2,700 22 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/1.f. 130 1,320 1 Each Connect to ex. 8" PVC @ $200.00/each Each 200 50 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 12" Buteerfly valve & box @ $800.00/each 500 1,100 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/l.f. 500 1,100 Each 6" Gate valve & box @ $350.00/each Total $ 23,420 Fittings @ $1.00/each 162000 +5% Contingencies Each 1,171 2,000 500 Sq.yds. $ 24,591 70 Ton +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 700 6,149 Lin.ft. B618 Concrete curb & gutter @ $10.00/l.f. TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $ 30,740 B.) WATER MAIN 500 Sq.yds. Remove bituminous street @ $2.00/sq.yd. $ 1,000 120 Lin.ft. Remove concrete curb & gutter @ $2.00/l.f. 240 150 Lin.ft. Remove 8" DIP @ $8.00/l.f. 1,200 8,600 Lin.ft. 12" DIP water main @ $22.00/l.f. 189,200 130 Lin.ft. 6" DIP water main @ $14.00/l.f. 1,820 13 Each Hydrant @ $1,050.00/each 13,650 8 Each 12" Buteerfly valve & box @ $800.00/each 6,400 1 Each 8" Gate valve & box @ $500.00/each 500 13 Each 6" Gate valve & box @ $350.00/each 4,550 16,000 Lbs. Fittings @ $1.00/each 162000 2 Each Connect to existing DIP @ $1,000.00/each 2,000 500 Sq.yds. Bituminous street restoration @ $25.00/sq.yd. 12,500 70 Ton Gravel for driveways @ $10.00/ton 700 120 Lin.ft. B618 Concrete curb & gutter @ $10.00/l.f. 13,200 50 Lin.ft. Salvage & Reinstall Chainlink Fence @ $7.00/l.f. 350 Page 8. 1332e B.) WATER MAIN - Continued 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. $ 1,000 8,720 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/l.f. 8,720 3,900 Sq.yds. Sodding @ $2.00/sq.yd. 7,800 4.7 Acres Seeding w/fertilizer & mulch @ $1,500.00/Ac. 7,050 1 Each Total $ $275,880 4 Cu.yds. +5% Contingencies 13,794 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. $ $289,674 1;670 Lin.ft. +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 72.416 TOTALWATER MAIN ...................................... $362,090 C.) WATER SERVICE 420 Lin.ft. 1" Type K copper @ $5.00/l.f. $ 2,100 6 Each 1" corporation stop @ $25.00/each 150 6 Each 1" Curb stop & box @ $70.00/each 420 420 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/l.f. 420 1 Each Total $ 3,090 4 Cu.yds. +5X Contingencies 155 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. $ 3,245 1;670 Lin.ft. +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 815 TOTALWATER SERVICE ................................... $ 4,060 D.) STORM SEWER 340 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer @ $25.00/l.f. $ 8,500 1,330 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer @ $22.00/l.f. 29,260 4 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 3,600 7 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 5,600 1 Each 18" RCP 'apron w/T.G. @ $700.00/each 700 4 Cu.yds. Riprap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 200 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 1;670 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/l.f. 1,670 Total $ 50,530 +5% Contingencies 2,525 $ 53,055 +25%,Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 13,265 TOTALSTORM SEWER.........................0.......... $ 66,320 Page 9. 1332e E.) STREET LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $5,000.00/L.S. $ 5,000 170 Sq.yds. Remove bituminous street @ $2.00/sq.yd. 340 1,500 Lin.ft. Slavage & reinstall chain link fence @ $7.00/1.f. 10,500 10,000 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $1.50/cu.yd. 15,000 2,000 Cu.yds. Subgrade excavation @ $2.00/cu.yd. 4,000 1,000 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $7.00/cu.yd. 7,000 7,700 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $5.50/ton 42,350 2,320 Ton Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton 25,520 880 Ton Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton 111440 180 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $140.00/ton 25,200 490 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 735 4,750 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/l.f. 23,750 75 Lin.ft. B624 concrete curb & gutter @ $7.00/l.f. 525 300 Lin.ft. Reinforcing for concrete curb & gutter@ $0.50/l.f. 150 1,000 Cu.yds. Topsoil borrow @ $8.00/cu.yd. 8,000 3.2 Acres Seed w/fertilizer & mulch @ $1,500.00/Ac. 42800 Total $184,310 +5% Contingencies 9,216 $193,526 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 48,384 TOTAL STREET ........................................ $241,910 Page 10. 1332e APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION (O'NEILL'S DRIVE) UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS A. SANITARY SEWER Parcel Description NW 1/4, SECTION 1 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 31 Parcel 010-02 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 020-04 B. WATER MAIN a.) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Assessable Assessment Total Footage Rate/Foot Assessment 695 $27.44 $ 19,072 115.0 27.44 3,156 310.2 27.44 8,512 TOTAL ........................ O'NEILL'S 1ST ADDITION $ 30,740 Parcel Front Description Footage Credit LONE OAK ADDITION Outlot A 368.02 150(1) Outlot N 817.10 -- Lot 1, Block 1 80.0 -- LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION Outlot B Total 1565.6 Outlot B 218.02 817.1 .Lot 1, Block 1 1425 Lot 1, Block 1 490 O'NEILL'S 1ST ADDITION 3,118 Lot 1, Block 1 130.0 Lot 2, Block 1 125.0 Lot 3, Block 1 115.0 Lot 4, Block 1 100.52 NW 1/4, SECTION 1 THE ROBERT O'NEILL HOMESTEAD 088-00 127.48 1332e Assessable Assessment Total F_ootage Rate/Foot Assessment 218.02 $41.10 $ 8,961 817.10 20.55 16,791 80.0 41.10 3,288 150(1) 1415.6 $41.10 $ 58,181 -- 817.1 20.55 16,791 -- 1425 41.10 58,568 -- 490 20.55 10,070 -- 130.0 $24.94 $ 3,242 -- 125.0 24.94 3,118 -- 115.0 24.94 2,868 -- 100.52 24.94 2,507 -- 1.27.48 Page 11. 41 $24.94. $. 3,179 B. WATER MAIN - Continued 32170 52,400 Outlot B 26.06 7.13(2) 18.93 3,170 Parcel Front 3,170 Assessable Assessment Total Description Footage Credit Footage Rate/Foot Assessment NW 1/4, SECTION i Lot 3, Block 1 -- -- -- 600 600 Lot 4, Block 1 -- -- -- 600 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 31 NW 1/4, SECTION 1 THE ROBERT O'NEILL HOMESTEAD Parcel 030-01 26.3 -- 26.3 $24.94 $ 656 Parcel 010-02 1026.1 -- 1026.1 24.94 25,591 Parcel 010-03 115.0 -- 115.0 24.94 2,868 Parcel 020-04 310.2 -- 310.2 24.94 7,736 Parcel 010-25 134.4 -- 134.4 24.94 3,352 Parcel 010-26 164.8 -- 164.8 24.94 4,110 Parcel 010-27 251.3 -- 251.3 24.94 6,267 Parcel 010-29 770.7 -- 770.7 24.94 19,221 NE 1/4, SECTION 1 Parcel 010-02 490 -- 490 $12.47 _ 6;110 TOTAL ........................... $263,475 b. Trunk Area Parcel Area Credit Assessable Assessment Total Description (Ac.) (Ac.) Area (Ac.) Rate/Acre Assessment LONE OAK ADDITION Outlot N 24.56 4.91 (2) 19.65 $ 3,170 $ 62,291 LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION Outlot A 16.53 -- 16.53 32170 52,400 Outlot B 26.06 7.13(2) 18.93 3,170 60,008 Lot 1, Block 1 39.73 16.30(2) 23.43 3,170 74,273 O'NEILL'S 1ST ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 -- -- -- 600 600 Lot 2, Block 1 -- -- -- 600 600 Lot 3, Block 1 -- -- -- 600 600 Lot 4, Block 1 -- -- -- 600 600 NW 1/4, SECTION 1 THE ROBERT O'NEILL HOMESTEAD 088-00 -- -- -- 600 600 Page 12. 1332e d �00 B. WATER MAIN - Continued Parcel Area Description(Ac.) NW 1/4, SECTION 1 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 31 Credit Assessable Assessment Total (Ac.) Area (Ac.) Rate/Acre Assessment Parcel 010-01 0.45 -- 0.45 Parcel 030-01 1.62 -- 1.62 Parcel 010-02 9.34 2.28(2) 7.06 Parcel 010-03 0.08 -- 0.08 Parcel 020-04 0.39 -- 0.39 Parcel 010-25 1.95 -- 1.95 Parcel 010-26 0.69 -- 0.69 Parcel 010-27 3.08 0.62(2) 2.46 Parcel 010-29 21.60 4.32(2) 17.28 NE 1/4, SECTION 1 Parcel 010-02 29.66 12.04(2'3) 17.62 TOTAL........................... C. WATER SERVICE Parcel No. of Description Services O'NEILL'S 1ST ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 1 Lot 2, Block 1 1 Lot 3, Block 1 1 Lot 4, Block 1 1 NW 1/4, SECTION 1 Parcel 010-26 1 THE ROBERT O'NEILL HOMESTEAD Parcel 088-00 1 Page 13. 1332e $ 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 Assessment Rate/Service $ 563 2,025 8,825 100 488 2,438 863 3,075 21,600 22,025 $313,974 Total $677 $ 677 677 677 677 677 677 677 677 677 677 677 $4,060 D. STORM SEWER Parcel Description NW 1/4, SECTION 1 Parcel 010-25 Parcel 010-26 Parcel 010-27 Parcel 010-29 LONE OAK ADDITION Lot 1, Blk. 1 LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION Outlot B E. STREET Parcel Description NW 1/4, SECTION 1 Parcel 010-25 Parcel 010-26 Parcel 010-27 Parcel 010-29 LONE OAK ADDITION Lot 1, Blk. 1 LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION Outlot B (1) Corner Lot Credit (2) Pond Credit (3) 20% Future Road Credit 1332e Assessable Footage 80 164.8 251.3 770.7 80 Assessment Rate/Foot $33.06 33.06 33.06 33.06 Total $ 2,645 5,449 8,309 25,483 2,645 659 $33.06 21,789 TOTAL ........................ $66,320 Page 14. Equivalent Assessable Assessment Total Footabe Rate/Foot Assessment 80 $35.44 $ 23,835 164.8 35.44 5,841 251.3 35.44 8,906 770.7 35.44 272314 80 82.37 6,590 1007.50 $82.37 82:988 TOTAL ........................ $134,474 Page 14. F Z N 00 M C4 O M ~ O. W ch O M1 d M1 o. .�.� v� M �f .r n �D �n m lD W N M M1O d u'1 Yui M d E W H W w M1 •Ny N v� O. M N d d d d M N It %p M d O M y N .ti M .-, .-' .r N N < K 00 f/T I N co LM .r W ti d c N M 00 P. d N M Vn An {V IT 11 0 M co 1 M N �p W W Wra N n n n n M1 M1 10 W d NN ti O 00 O O 'n n N O O O O O O O O M 'D .n N M N O O 00 00 co M M 'D u'f n O O O O Vn N 7 1+ 1 04 O .O .D O O� f'" b Y1 N h N F ' as y PC W 0+ cc �y 04 Wyt b .D o m n O en N d 00 .-, 00 .D M1 o .p H 00 .D N O M1 .� O. O N O. w N O. .D N O u. �n %D o. In �D en N N N V1 N M1 M d .O .r M �p t M N W H H N �D N oG n U"t .r ' ^W O, "� M 00 n W FA �•� vi cn W� x F o F C N o � .r H .ti q.. .-. ti .-i � •m a O Y O Y Y Y Y Y ~ • > O O O O O N ►� H u O A < u H u u u u x •.i 1 I 1 1 1 O 1 O 'M W0 O O O O ►+ 'o O O O M O O O iD M CI Iq .ti O O .-� O _ O N O IA N .O M1 O,OD K w' U y N N N O O H O a ►+ O O .r N O O — W N Oeu•1 O.0+ W .Mbduu u � V •-+ M d W 0 u W uM W a6HO W Ob O u O u u O u O O m Od 0!Oa m 41 OF M a w a►aaa a wa a .+ eOua wu-� 4) z , INTERSTATE No. 494 . � CONNECT TO Ex. 8" PVC — WA. THE ROEENT O'NEILL HOMEOTEAU, Oi®-00 A�a Cfry OF MENDOTA 1(WOOT! D 7 010-27 w �« �a � I, i 010-08 0/0728 PROPOSED 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER OUMOT A } OUTLOT 0 O'NEILL'O RIROT ADDITION OUTLOT C OUTLOT E LONE OAK 2nd ADDITION CITY PROJECT NO. 492 SANITARY SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA OUTLOT D [ate 1ke) T� m 1 O Ex. NORTHW96T AIRLINES CORPORATE HEADQIIARTERO ROAfe FP-4 ?RC1gO 4IC OUTLOT G BONESTR00. ROSENE. ANDERUK do ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul. Minnesota Date: JAN. 1987 1 Fig. NO. 'Comm, 49411 d sed aar► �htiM LONE OAK 2nd ADDITION CITY PROJECT NO. 492 SANITARY SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA OUTLOT D [ate 1ke) T� m 1 O Ex. NORTHW96T AIRLINES CORPORATE HEADQIIARTERO ROAfe FP-4 ?RC1gO 4IC OUTLOT G BONESTR00. ROSENE. ANDERUK do ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul. Minnesota Date: JAN. 1987 1 Fig. NO. 'Comm, 49411 CONNECT TO Ex. 8" DIP -- sw tw...r V"" rora.tt�. w� .•wra•. rrnr a.arwr CONNECT T EIL 12" DIP 010-" N r r r LONE OAK 2nd ADDITION BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERUK do ASSOCIATES. INC. CITY PROJECT No. 492 Engineers & Architects ` St. Poul, Minnesota WATER MAIN Dote: JAN. 1887 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 'Comm. 49411 F19• .No• z " anorrr ooti,rr�rrl— NTERSTATE ft 4" too Mitr-r.. 170rr 010-#/ POSED 12r DIP w�a x u O WATER MAIN i • • I ,OUR= A CKMMOT ■ \ 7 (D � • / troiiisri ; . uuir.n wnrrunu riixrrrar rriiraii :��y"` rriNgi ...w. Cil ..,,.�.'i ... OUROTC roMo rr-s rs� r w r Its r A OUTLOT 0 A. r!�• r NO 12" DIP OUnOT N OUTIM 1 j OUROT O OUROT [ 0* 1 i OUROt L 1 OURAT R %00 r 1' 010-66 � 7 OUTLOT a 060-06 OUTLOT K ; 020-01 070-66 0 0," ob 060.66 COUNTY ROAD ft 2 1 N r r r LONE OAK 2nd ADDITION BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERUK do ASSOCIATES. INC. CITY PROJECT No. 492 Engineers & Architects ` St. Poul, Minnesota WATER MAIN Dote: JAN. 1887 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 'Comm. 49411 F19• .No• z CfTV of OIENDOTA HEIGHTS INTERSTATE No. 494 .� O NEILL S DR --- 010-0 r 10 p 0 0 tit ()Its 010-02 LOr1E *10-27 PROPOSED'' STORM SEWER 010-29 is„ POND FP -11 8 POND Ex. STO M SEWER FP -4 �O yF )ND FP -4 1 rlloroEEO PARKING Ea. NO WEST AINUNEE rROPOSID '�•••:':,• CORPORATE MEAOONARTENE NORTHWEST ;yrr': �,• T01 AIMING TRAIMING O CENTER 0 O ?' P DF 4 PND a . . 1 POND FP -6 D 9� A O OUTLOT O F OUTLOT H LONE OAK 2nd ADDITION CITY PROJECT No. 492 STORM SEWER EAGANF MINNESOTA w A BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERUK do ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul. Minnesota Date: JAN. 1987 3 Comm. 49411 Fig. NO. -,,.- �, %i �;. OUTLOT 1 1 i A 0 1 .I 1 1 1 r �-- � rtes .ar S.M. A F.M BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERUK do ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul. Minnesota Date: JAN. 1987 3 Comm. 49411 Fig. NO. BEGIN TNs sonN1 N'NSN.L WNEW"s ►1Ns7 ADIN11 N LONE OAK 2nd ADDITION CITY PROJECT No. 492 STREET IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA 4 " BONESTR00. ROSENE. ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: JAN. 1987 I1jp 4 Comm. 49411 Fig. L.O N E OAK 2nd ADDITION CITY PROJECT No. 492 WATER MAIN ASSESSMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTR00. ROSENE, ANDERUK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: JAN. 1987 No. 5 Comm. 49411 FIC]. a r O W G � u J Z J 7,F W Q Y W Q a 2 ¢ZZW 2 W • BONESTR00. ROSENE, ANDERUK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: JAN. 1987 No. 5 Comm. 49411 FIC]. a 11 is 4 co o�llpw�' E.- Rk as N 1 O r O 7- 0 .A - O.A J t ° 0 f Y 04C F W O 0 0 9 0 9 ° V LONE OAK 2nd ADDITION CITY PROJECT No. 492 SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND STREET ASSESSEMENTS ;EAGAN, MINNESOTA HNna j BONESTROD. ROSENE. ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: ---. Comm.Fig. No. 6 f aIL .... ° b o re r � VY rYse_ •SO V< �L a Y O�s�s Q. 10 MUM asi..0 = 1� 0 o _a _, O E) !O to 9� r O. Q►Y rr s� 90 s a „0 azo, p � O O OZ E -W �z� Gw itd3:)W Uzi 5w,- ZWt; J OW z M-1 3XNH Wm N WIZ mWU Z O N3ZZ �- as �f- �gw w OW U ���.ai W— WSW W 4 Q2WV) as N a�� JV1N � ~jr WW ll 0 cn cn snQ J t ° 0 f Y 04C F W O 0 0 9 0 9 ° V LONE OAK 2nd ADDITION CITY PROJECT No. 492 SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND STREET ASSESSEMENTS ;EAGAN, MINNESOTA HNna j BONESTROD. ROSENE. ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: ---. Comm.Fig. No. 6 Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Ten TOWN_ CENTRE 100 PROFESSIONAL BUILDING INDOOR TRASH STORAGE REQUEST A. Request to Eliminate the Condition Requiring Indoor Trash Storage for the Town Centre 100 Professional Building Located on Town Centre Drive --At the January 20, 1987 City Council meeting, a request by Laura Marks, representing Town Centre 100 2nd Addition, to change a condition that would displace the trash containment from the interior of the office building to the exterior, was continued until the February 3, 1987 City Council meeting, at the request of the applicant. Enclosed on pages 19 through 9 _ is a copy of a letter and drawing requesting the change. Also enclosed on page(s) . ;9/ is a copy of a letter from Federal Land Company, objecting to the request to change this condition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a change in condition #7 that was granted with the July 1, 1986 preliminary plat that requires trash to be enclosed within the interior of the building. The request being considered would allow the trash to be stored within a brick enclosed trash area connected to the building. 23 I RECEIVEp j-" 14 I987r January 12, 1987 Mr. Jim Sturm City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Town Centre 100 2nd Addition Office Building Trash Enclosure Dear Jim: rk At the City Council meeting of July 1, 1986, Condition #7 was placed on the prelimnary plat approval stating that a trash enclosure be incorporated into the interior of the building. We are requesting that this condition be changed to an outside brick enclosed trash area connected to the building by a wall con- :...structed of the same material as the building and the trash enclosure. Attached is a drawing illustrating this proposed change. „..rYour favorable consideration of this matter would be appreciated. Sincerely, 4 t., 4. MX62_< A4= Laura Marks LM/ble Enclosure � �9 A pq1 F ` a3`rj '+ P4 3 , jr+t3yr 3R•" ,cin �'' I� Federal �� Land Com I7t ] ; �, �+Tf Ia Y. Twit j Yankee Square Office II 0 3470 Washington Drive 0 Suite lOQ 4, Eagan, Minnesota 55122 0 YTel. 612-452-3303 3, January 20, 1987Ar Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Administrator �City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road ` P. O. Box 21-199 ; sf s� Eagan,' Mn. 55122 RE Town Centre 100 Project Dear Mr. Hedges, I I 1 I .Y ., IAF ,. It hascome to the attention of Federal'Land Company that a request has y ..been made to eliminate the condition in the Town Centre 100 Second `�_, Addition Development Agreement requiring inside trash storage for the Town Centre 100 Professional Building. Federal Land Company, as a ..,,.-party to the Development Agreement, strongly opposes and does not agree, to the elimination.of this condition. In developing the Town Centre 100 Project, Federal Land Company is very. concerned with the site design, appearance and aesthetics of the area. It is for this reason that a Development Framework Criteria was created• by Federal Land Company for the Town Centre 100 Project. The ;. Development Framework Criteria specifies that trash storage be confined ?° ,to the interior of the buildings. The City staff has also adopted this requirement by making it a contractual obligation in the Development`s Agreement ..•' t ,' + '_. t t+•S'=. ,{ >.� t C .r.',: ,L.•i•r,.. '. t•}•' : i�,. q.. 'I I' ��.a 'a41e I��,i Federal. Land Company intends to.diligently enforce the requirement that trash be stored within the'interior'of the buildings within the Town t�'r Centre 100 Project and requests that the City not change its Position�.,r..`T'' ;,�.�' •: ,from what was agreed to and is presently stated in the Development Contract. �" ,, `. • :� , a 1 C, 1 i i 1 J G f J- 1 !i, a a+ fit1 d 'L;•, w E. as 5 .Sy .SinYours, 2 i c 1,y , r .. L Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eleven COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN UPDATE A. Consideration to Update Comprehensive Guide Plan and Submit Plan to Metropolitan Council for Review --A decision was made by the City Council in early 1985 to direct its planning consultant and City Planning staff to commence a review of the Comprehensive Guide Plan to be used as a mid -decade update and review of the Comprehensive Guide Plan as adopted in 1980. Meetings were held jointly by the City Council and Planning Commission in excess of one (1) year. A public hearing was scheduled in early December 1986 and the record was kept open for 30 days to allow public comment. That time frame/record was closed January 9, 1987. Numerous letters were received from residents and other concerned parties and copies were distributed for City Council review on January 22. If any member of the City Council is missing these letters, please feel free to contact the City Administrator's office and a new copy will be made. For a copy of a report by the City Planner, a memo by the City Attorney and copy of a resolution adopted by the Lagan. Advisory Planning Commission, refer to pages$3through g The proper action by the City Council is to receive the Comprehen- sive Guide Plan update as presented the Advisory Planning Commis- sion with or without any final changes. The City will then submit the Comprehensive Guide Plan update to the Metropolitan Council for their review and consideration. Once the Met Council conducts their review, the plan will be returned to the City for final ratification and approval by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Comprehensive Guide Plan update, with or without amendments, as presented by the APC and submit the same to the Metropolitan Council for their review and consideration. The minutes for the APC meeting of January 27, 1987, are enclosed on pages and M.- 0/ MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 30, 1987 SUBJECT: EAGAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE On January 27, 1987, the Advisory Planning Commission reviewed the findings of the December 9, 1986, public hearing. In their -review, they found the amendment to be adequate with the exception that the Research and Development District around Country Home Heights should be removed because of the existing Planned Development and platting which has occurred in that area. Also, the Commission requested that the Freeway Development Designation be removed from the Comprehensive Guide Plan and that efforts be taken to look at the Freeway Development District,as well as a potential study of the proposed locations where the Freeway Development District could occur. On January 29, 1987, the Advisory Planning Commission brought up the Comprehensive Guide Plan designation for CPD for clarification. In this clarification, the Commission reaffirmed the step that they took on January 27 and that all of the CPD designations should remain as proposed on the Comprehensive Guide Plan map dated November 1986. It was the Planning Commission's understanding that the CPD District is not a change in zoning, however, a tool the City can use to tighten control over certain commercial and industrial districts that have been previously designated in the 1980 Comprehensive Guide Plan. Fopefully, this memorandum updates you and clarifies the concern regarding action taken on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. If you have any additional questions or further information, please advise. Planner DCR/jj MEMO TO: PAM MC CREA, CHAIRPERSON AND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 21, 1987 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THE EAGAN COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN Since the December 9, 1986 public hearing, the Comprehensive Plan record has been left open for 30 days in order to obtain additional written comment. In this 30 day period, numerous letters have been received by the City. These letters have been reviewed by City staff and have been split into three general categories. These categories are 1) specific requests to change land uses within the Comprehensive Guide Plan, 2) general comments regarding the Comprehensive Plan, such as much commercial zoning, not enough commercial zoning, etc., and, 3) comments regarding the Diffley Center proposal and how land uses should or should not be changed for this development request. Enclosed with this memorandum are copies of all letters the City has received in the 30 day period for your review. Also with this memorandum is a copy of the transcript of the hearing record of December 9, 1986 for your review. In review of the January 27, 1987 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, it is expected that the Planning Commission will review the public comment regarding the Comprehensive Guide Plan. City staff is in the process of preparing a presentation in regard to the comments requesting specific change in the plan. This presentation will highlight all of the changes which were requested and respond in general to the overall land use issues. Staff will also be available to answer any questions which the Commission may have regarding any of the specific responses to the Comprehensive Guide Plan. After this presentation by staff and questions answered of the Advisory Planning Commission, it is expected that the Planning Commission would make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The City Council will then review the Advisory Planning Commission's recommendations and review any outstanding issues regarding the Comprehensive Guide and forward the Comprehensive Guide Plan to the Metropolitan Council for their review and comment. It would not be until the Comprehensive Guide Plan comes back from the Metropolitan Council that the City Council would take formal action to adopt the amendment package proposed for the Comprehensive Guide Plan. It is expected that this process may take several months to complete and execute the Comprehensive Plan amendment process. Again, enclosed with this memorandum is a complete copy of all of the letters submitted to the City of Eagan which have been entered into the public record. Also enclosed is the transcript of the December 9, 1986 public hearing and a memorandum and resolution prepared by the City Attorney regarding some suggested reasons for accepting the Comprehensive Guide or rejecting the Comprehensive Guide Plan. �� f The last comment is in regard to the letters received by the City of Eagan. The City has reviewed and logged in all. people who have submitted letters regarding the comprehensive planning process. The City has prepared a form letter thanking the individuals for their comment and response to the Comprehensive Guide Plan and that their letters will be forwarded on to the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council for their review. If anyone has any questions or would like additional information on this item, please contact me at City Hall. -__L—& City Planne Enclosures DCR/jeh HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW WATER VIEW OFFICE TOWER, SUITE 303 1200 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123 PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN DEBRA E. SCHMIDT Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: 1987 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Tom: January 22, 1987 AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 456.9000 454-4224 The Eagan Advisory Planning Commission has scheduled on its agenda at its regular meeting on January 27, 1987 a review of the proposed amendment to the Eagan Comprehensive Guide. In order to place the amendment process into perspective, the following are some comments that may be helpful to the Planning Commission members: 1. M.S. 462.355, Subd. 1 provides that the planning agencies shall prepare the Comprehensive Municipal Plan, and shall review the plan and recommend amendments whenever necessary. 2. Subd. 2 provides that the City Council may propose amendments to the Municipal Plan by Resolutions submitted to the planning agency and the planning agency shall hold at least one public hearing regarding the amendments. 3. The adoption of the amendment of the plan or any section shall be by a Resolution of a majority of all of the members of the Planning Commission. 4. A copy of the plan adopted by the planning agency shall be certified to the governing body of the City. 5. M.S. § 473.864 defines the role that the Metropolitan Council has in reviewing comprehensive plans. 6. Under Subd. 3 of the same section, the City Council may by Resolution of a majority of its members, adopt and amend the Comprehensive Plan so recommended, as the official municipal plan, upon notice and hearing prescribed by ordinance. In this respect, it would be advisable for the City Council, after it has been returned to it by the Metropolitan Council, that there be a formally noticed public hearing concerning the adoption of the amended plan. Subd. 3 also indicates that until so adopted by the governing body, the plan shall constitute only the recommendation of the Planning Commission. W Thomas Hedges January 22, 1987 Page 2 The Advisory Planning Commission will have before it the City of Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment/December 1986, together with other materials submitted by the staff. Although I realize that the Planning Commission has adopted a policy that will not accept draft resolutions covering applications submitted to it for its recommendation, I would recommend that the Planning Commission review the draft Resolution that I have prepared covering the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the draft Resolution is enclosed, but it should be understood that it is only a draft and for illustration purposes and need not be accepted in its entirety. It includes the alternates for either approval or denial of the amendment and should be received in that context. PHH:ras cc: Dale Runkle ry truly yours, HAU", EIDE &KE R, P.A. I Paul H. Hauge CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 1986 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 462.353, Subd. 1, provides that municipalities may carry on comprehensive municipal planning activities for guiding the future development and improvement of the municipality and may prepare, adopt and amend a comprehensive municipal plan and implement such plan by ordinance and other official actions in accordance with Minnesota Statute; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes also authorize a municipality to collect and analyze data, prepare maps, charts, tables and conduct necessary studies in order to implement the plan; and WHEREAS, under Minnesota Statutes Section 462.355, Subd. 1, the planning agency or advisory planning commission shall prepare the contents of the municipal plan and shall periodically review the plan and recommend amendments whenever necessary; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan adopted an Eagan Land Use Development Guide, dated January, 1974; and WHEREAS, the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission and City Council adopted a Comprehensive Guide Plan dated March, 1980 and described certain goals and policies for development of the City; and WHEREAS, the goals and policies section of the Plan state that "over - zoning for commercial and industrial development will be resisted and a special effort will be made to make zoning consistent with economic viability." (Page 11-2) and _ W^ - WHEREAS, the Plan provides that "the city will continue its efforts to relate zoning to the demonstrative potential of commercial and industrial [am development and not to over -zone areas beyond the realistic potential that exits within the city."; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan provides that it- is meant to serve as a guide and should possess a decree of flexibility; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Guide Plan included a Land Use Guide Plan Map utilizing a land use intensity approach for residential development, but more specifically, designating locations for proposed residential, commercial and industrial development, a copy of which Land Use Map is attached to this Resolution and marked Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted zoning regulations under Code Chapter 11 and subdivision regulations under Code Chapter 13 in accordance with M.S.A. Chapter 462, The Municipal Planning And Development act which code sections provide for the minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City; and WHEREAS, the Eagan City Council, in early 1985, directed its planning consultant and City Planning Staff to commence a review of the Comprehensives Guide Plan to include a review of the existing development, the existing comprehensive land use guide map, changes and request for revisions in use categories, etc.; and WHEREAS, regular joist meetings of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission and City Council have been held commencing with October 8, 1985 at which meetings interested persons, property owners, developers and representatives were present and were given an opportunity to make presentations at certain meetings; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission in conjunction with a special meeting of the Eagan City Council on December 9, 1986, at which developers, owners, interested persons and representatives were allowed to submit written and oral testimony; and Sq WHEREAS, the Advisory Planning Commission allowed written comments and information to be submitted to the City through January 9, 1987 which would become a part of the Comprehensive Guide review record and considered by the Advisory Planning Commission in its draft Amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan; and WHEREAS, a written record including minutes of each of the joint Advisory Planning Commission and City Council Comprehensive Guide Amendment meetings has been kept, at each of which meetings a quorum of the City Counsel and/or Advisory Planning Commission members were present and which meetings were open to the general public and to the news media; and WHEREAS, copies of all of the written documents relating to the Comprehensive Guide Review including agenda packets, staff and consultant reports, minutes of meetings, and written comments from interested persons, owners and developers, are on file at the Eagan City Hall; and WHEREAS, since the adoption of the 1980 Comprehensive Guide Plan there have been numerous requests for amendment to the Plan and the City Council, at its meeting on October 8, 1985, indicated that the purpose of the current amendment process was to implement the changes that have been approved and to authorize appropriate revisions; and WHEREAS, owners and developers have submitted requests and formal applications to amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan in specific locations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed and considered the adoption of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment dated December, 1986, including a Land Use Guide Plan Map dated November, 1986; NOW THEREFORE, upon motion by Member Harrison, seconded by Member Wilkins, it was resolved that the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission is hereby on record recommending approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment dated December, 1986, including the Land Use Guide Plan Map, dated November, 1986 as amended with the following revisions: a. The freeway development proposal on page 13 be stricken from the draft amendment. b. The R & D designation on, the Land Use Map on the north and east of Country Home Heights be stricken in compliance with earlier action of the City Council and Planning Commission. FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of such Comprehensive Guide Plan and Map shall be filed with the Eagan City Council according to statute; FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Advisory Planning Commission recommend to City. Council that it forward copies of the Plan to the Metropolitan Council for its review and consideration according to M.S. Section 473.864. Those in favor: Hall, Harrison, Wilkins, McCrea, Trygg, Voracek and Gustafson. Those against: None. Dated: January 27, 1987 S EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COM,*1ISSION By: Its: Secretary APC Minutes January 27, 1987 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN UPDATE At 7:30 p.m., Chairman Hall who took over as Chairperson for the meeting, introduced Dale Runkle and stated that a public hearing had been held at the December 9, 1986 Joint Advisory Planning Commission/City Council meeting regarding the Comprehensive Guide Plan update. A large number of interested persons, developers and owners were present in the audience. Dale Runkle was asked to review the update and introduced John Voss, the Consulting Planner. He mentioned that this is the third Comprehensive Plan review and a formal document was prepared and submitted to the members at the December 9, 1986 meeting. He briefly reviewed the general areas covered at the joint meetings of the Planning Commission and Council during the past approximately 18 months, and paraphrased for those present, the December 1986 Amendment document. Mr. Voss explained the proposed freeway development which had been included in the draft amendment, but noted that no parcels had been specified for that use. Dale Runkle described the two Land Use Guide Plan Maps that were prepared and presented to the Planning Commission: a. Land Use Guide Plan Map dated July 1986. The blue parcels indicate changes that have taken place and developed in accordance with the zoning; pink parcels indicate a higher intensity use; yellow noted terminology changes that had been provided. b. Land Use Guide Plan Map dated November 1986. The area colored red indicates where owners have requested specific changes. Mr. Runkle described several of those parcels. He noted that the major changes are along the I -35E corridor area and about 13 of 18 requests appeared in that specific area. He stated that the Richard Cole property at the northeast corner of the City had been proposed to be guided comparable to the land immediately adjacent to the west. The Reid parcels along Pilot Knob Road indicate Limited Business. The amount of industrial use land has increased, including the Laukka-Beck changes from retail planned development. Member McCrea noted :that the purpose was to bring the map up to date with some narrative changes and further stated there is strong emphasis on increasing the number of high value single family residential homes in the City. Member McCrea suggested that the Planning Commission not recommend approval of the freeway classification without incorporating some safeguards. Mr. Gustafson asked if the freeway designation would be a new commercial category, and Mr. Voss stated that it was a mixture of industrial and commercial uses. Member Harrison was concerned about adopting the freeway category without further study and Consultant Voss suggested that the designation of freeway category could be implemented but that no parcels be designated freeway until later studies have been completed. Mr. Harrison also recommended that no 3 APC Minutes January 27, 1987 specific action be taken on the high value housing portion until the areas are more clearly specified and he recommended Estate zoning be designated for higher value housing. He also requested that the R & D use around the Country Home Heights Addition be stricken, according to earlier action of the Planning Commission and Council. Member McCrea suggested lessening the requirements to allow more higher value housing and Mr. Gustafson also favored not limiting the area where such housing would be permitted. City Attorney Paul Hauge submitted a proposed set of Findings and Conclusions and suggested a final draft of the Resolution be returned to the Planning Commission to incorporate the changes. At approximately 8:15 p.m., Member Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and revised map with two changes, including the deletion of the freeway development provision on page 13, and revising the R & D designation on the north and east sides of Country Home Heights, according to earlier Planning Commission and Council action, all according to a Resolution adopted by the Advisory Planning Commission, a copy of which is attached to these Minutes. All members voted yes. Harrison then moved, McCrea seconded the motion that the freeway development use concept be studied further by the staff and the Planning Commission with consideration at a later time, with the understanding that the freeway concept could be implemented along each of the freeway corridors within the City; further, that the study include a traffic analysis and also take into account existing comprehensive guide uses along the freeways. All commission members voted in favor. 35-E DIFFLEY CENTER - BIETER COMPANY APPLICATION PRELIMINARY PLAT, REZONING & COMP GUIDE REVISION At 8:15 p.m. Chairman Hall reconvened the continued public hearing regarding the application of the Bieter Company for rezoning 88.76 acres of A (Agricultural) land and 2.2 acres of RB (Roadside Business) land to RSC -PD (Regional Shopping Center -Planned Development); preliminary plat approval of the first phase of the major shopping complex; and comprehensive guide plan revision from R -II (Mixed Residential) and PF (Public Facilities) to RSC (Regional Shopping Center) use designation. Mr. Hall indicated the Planning Commission had considered the application at its November 25, 1986 regular meeting, at which time the Planning Commission requested further information from the staff. Agenda Information Memo February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twelve PRELIMINARY PLAT AND REZONING/I-35E DIFFLEY CENTER ADDITION A Preliminary Plat, Bieter Company, for I -35E Diffley Center Addition and a Rezoning from A to RSC for Approximately 91 Acres --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on November 25, 1986 to consider applications for a preliminary plat entitled I -35E Diffley Center Addition, a rezoning from A to RSC and a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment changing this parcel from D -II to RSC, as submitted by the Bieter Company. The APC recommended continuance for 60 days to allow the staff an opportunity to address some specific questions that were raised by members of the Planning Commission at that meeting. Those questions were addressed by the City staff and the public hearing was reopened at the January 27, 1987 APC meeting. After hearing public testimony, reviewing the response to the questions raised by the APC and addressed by City staff, it was the recommendation of the Commission that the Comprehensive Guide Plan not be amended from a D -II status to an RSC status. As a result of that action, there was no action required on the rezoning or preliminary plat. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the original report sent to the Planning Commission, dated November 25, 1986, and prepared by the Planning and Engineering Departments. Also enclosed on pages 1/ through 13( is a copy of a memo from the City Administrator and a special report that was prepared by City staff, at the request of the Planning Commission. At the Advisory Planning Commission meeting, letters were circulated by Peter Jarvis on behalf of his client that were written by Target and the Northwest Swim and Fitness Club. Copies of those letters are enclosed on pages J3 through �_. Also a report was distributed to the APC fr m James B. McComb and Associates that provided data and shopping center locations, giving several s�cce� Lar los. This information is enclosed on pages _W1____ through Enclosed on pages > through is a copy of the resolution adopted with respect to th s proposed project by the Advisory Planning Commission at their meeting held on January 27, 1987. Also enclosed on pages through ISD are copies of the minutes of this meeting. The letters written by residents and other interested parties were distributed to each member of the City Council, with a copy of the Planning Commission packet last Thursday. If any member of the City Council would like another copy of those letters or any additional information on this item, please feel free to contact this office or the City Administrator at this time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan, changing the D -II designation to an RSC designation and if that action is affirmative, to change/amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Then it is appropriate to address the rezoning from an A to an RSC and the preliminary plat entitled Diffley Center Addition. goo: C. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: CITY OF EAGAN REZONING, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT (35-E DIFFLEY CENTER) BIETER COMPANY SW 1/4, SECTION 21 A (AGRICULTURAL) & RB (ROADSIDE BUSINESS) NOVEMBER 25, 1986 NOVEMBER 20, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS: Two separate applications have been submitted to the City for the 35-E Diffley Center, a shopping center complex consisting of 735,000 sq. ft. The first application is a request to rezone 88.76 acres of A (Agricultural Land) and 2.2 acres of RB (Roadside Business) to a Regional Shopping Center Planned Development RSC (P.D.). The second application is for a Preliminary Plat of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 5 in the first phase of this major shopping complex. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area as R -II (Mixed Residential, 3-6 dwelling units per acre) and P (Parks & Public Space). Therefore, an Amendment will be necessary. This proposal is located north of Diffley Road at the 35-E interchange and has its easterly property line approximately 250' east of Thomas Lake Road. PROJECT SCOPE: The proposal calls for a phased development consisting primarily of five major anchors located within two large building structures. These include a 102,000 sq. ft. Target store, a 170,000 sq. ft. Northwest Swim and Racquet Club and a 60,000 sq. ft. department store in the first phase. Two other larger tenants may include a childrens store, sporting goods store or a catalog showroom -type store. Supporting retail uses would fill in the areas between these major tenants, creating a Phase I total of 470,000 sq. ft. of gross building area. Phase II would contain an 89,000 sq. ft. home improvement center and a 75,000 sq. ft. discount grocery store. Supporting uses will also be included. Both phases will be physically separated by a proposed extention of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. This road will loop to the east and tie into the extention of Thomas Lake Road from Diffley Road to Deerwood Drive. 9/ 35E DIFFLEY CENTER NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE TWO A 6 -acre area east of the Thomas Lake Road extention has been designated for 40,000 sq. ft. of office use and would act as a buffer to the adjacent undeveloped land to the east. An 8.4 acre area on the northeast portion of the site has been designated as a Public Use area. This may be used to fulfill the City's Park Dedication requirement. ZONING & LAND USE: Currently, this site is inactive. The area closest to the 35-E interchange was used as a temporary cement plant for the 35-E construction through Eagan. At that time, a grading permit was issued, and approximately 1/3 of the site has been rough graded. The natural characteristic of the site is one of knolls with a mixture of young to mature hardwood trees, most of which are oaks. This 90+acre site is surrounded by agricultural parcels to the north and east. A possible City water storage facility near the northwest portion of the site and along 35-E has been discussed, but is not an imminent proposal. The Deerfield Apartment project consisting of 324 units is across Diffley to the south, along with RB (Roadside Business) zoning extending west to the freeway. Across 35-E to the west is more high density housing and the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center. The 100' wide Williams Brothers Pipeline easement crosses the site in a northerly manner near the eastern portion of the site. The pipeline will be lowered in this area when the Diffley Road improvements take place., SITE PLAN/CODE CONFORMANCE: Johnny Cake and Thomas Lake Roads will provide the actual access into this site and to the major parking areas required for retail use. Instead of breaking down the parking requirements for each proposed user, staff based the parking requirements on the worst possible scenerio, or that of all retail use. In that case, Code would require 2,966 parking stalls. This site plan provides 3,442 stalls. In other cities, health clubs are often reviewed separately because of the specific nature of the facility. Also, their hours of operation do not necessarily correspond with those of the adjacent retail use. In any event, cross easements will be a necessity for the overall continuity of this project. Each building component should be reviewed, in detail by the staff/Advisory Commissions and Council prior to final plat submission in order that specific concerns can be addressed and resolved. The Planned Development Agreement should be signed before any site development and/or grading takes place. The overall lot coverage is 18.5% and 30% is permitted by City Code in RSC Districts. All setbacks meet Code requirements in this Preliminary Plat proposal. q�- 35E DIFFLEY CENTER NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE THREE TRAFFIC: The actual amount of traffic and the patterns generated by this proposal have inititated much of the prepublic hearing discussion. This site will be serviced by two City collector streets, a County road and a full diamond- Interstate highway interchange. All of these roads have been or will be designed to accommodate the additional traffic in the area. Staff has reviewed preliminary numbers that indicate the traffic generated by this development should not cause undue stress on the improved roadway system. However, the detailed traffic study has not been reviewed in detail at this point in time. Pilot Knob Road will begin to be improved in 1987 and take two years to complete. Cliff Road is also scheduled for improvements in the near future. Since Diffley and Cliff Roads cannot both be closed at the same time, there will have to be a coordinated effort between the County, City and developer regarding the improvement schedule in order to minimize traffic delays within the City. A detailed traffic analysis has been provided by B.R.W., Inc. It has been prepared to include a "Post Development" scenerio, that is, with this project completed, Blackhawk Plaza fully developed and all existing traffic around the site included in the ADTS (Average Daily Trips) figures. All roads were calculated on their improved status or proposed design capabilities. ENVIRONMENTALS: An EAW (Environmental Assessment Worksheet) and ISP (Indirect Source Permit) will be required and staff is currently working with the appropriate governmental agencies to determine what elements will be required to obtain the specific permit. It has not been determined whether a full EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) will be necessary. Other permits may need 'to be obtained from the MWCC (Metropolitan Waste Control Commission) and the Metropolitan Council. Another concern the City must deal with is the amount of existing retail commercial zoning in Eagan as well as the amount in other surrounding cities. Also related would be the market absorption for a major complex of this type. Both the Target and Northwest Swim and Racquet Club have committed to this specific site and to the first phase of development. FIRE & POLICE PROTECTION: Both of these departments have only reviewed this proposal on a preliminary basis. However, there were no major issues that would appear to be unresol vable with the proper platting and building permit procedure. Access to and within the site will be critical to the safety of all those in the general area. Aside from the Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Thomas Lake Road improvements, all other interior parking areas and road systems shall be reviewed more extensively with the detailed building and individual lot plans. F-3 35E DIFFLEY CENTER NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE FOUR PARK ISSUES: Trails along Diffley and Thomas Lake Roads will be required and the APRC (Advisory ParKs & Recreation Commission) will need to review this project for the appropriateness of the Parks Dedication fee. The Public Recreation portion of this site has been deliberately left undeveloped so that the City would be able to study this area in greater detail. Should that area not fit in with the City's overall Park System and Master Plan, another use will need to be proposed prior to the signing of the P.D. Agreement. SITE AESTHETICS: Staff is recommending that an overall landscape plan be submitted to ensure compatability of species and overall continuity in this large proposal. All plant material sizes shall be in conformance with the City's Landscape Policy. Special design emphasis will be placed on the berming and screening of parking areas, trash locations and loading/service areas. All detailed plans submitted on a grading plan would then be required with the individual lot plans. These plans should be prepared by a Landscape Architect familiar with native species and plant material hardiness. An overall Sign Agreement shall also be entered into by the developer prior to the issuance of any individual sign permits. This will eliminate any undue variances and provide a more uniform cohesive development. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The western portion of this site has been previously graded under Excavation Permit No. EX 21-194 in 1984 in conjunction with the construction of I -35E. The eastern two-thirds of this site still remains in the natural undisturbed condition consisting of extreme elevation differentials of approximately 60'. The proposed grading of this development would include the development of seven onsite storm water detention basins. Several extensive retaining walls will have to be constructed along adjacent property lines due to the extreme change in elevations. The final approved grading plan adjacent to Diffley Road must be compatible with the final design grades of the future County Road 30 (Diffley Road) road improvements. The required grading of the overall site involves extensive cuts and fills up to 40'. Although this development is proposed to be constructed in a phased program, it is recommended that the grading of the entire site be completed with the first phase to ensure that all the storm water detention basins are developed and to minimize the negative impact of potential significant unbalanced final cut/fill quantities and to allow the construction of the required retaining wall structures, buffer landscape screening and permanent vegetation restoration for erosion control. 4 35E DIFFLEY CENTER NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE FIVE The two storm water detention basins in the extreme southeast corner of this development will have to have a storm sewer outlet extended approximately 600' east along Diffley Road to the existing City trunk system, which has adequate capacity to handle this proposed runoff. The remaining five proposed storm water detention basins which provide for a total storage volume of 25 acre-feet shall be interconnected by a master storm sewer system approved by the City with an ultimate discharge to the north. The storm sewer system will have to be extended across the adjacent property (Francis Franz) to the existing City/state storm sewer system north of Deerwood Drive adjacent to I -35E. The final storm sewer and drainage system will have to be revised to eliminate the proposed discharge into the I -35E right-of-way along the western boundaries of this development due to current restrictions by MnDOT. In addition, a storm sewer system will have to be extended to the south of Diffley Road to provide a future outlet with a capacity of approximately 65 CFS. In summary, there are no major concerns associated with the grading and drainage of this proposed development subject to maintaining the proposed onsite storm water detention capacities and extending the storm sewer system to existing downstream trunk facilities. Figure 1 shows the relationship and the compatibility of this development to the existing comprehensive storm sewer system. These existing trunk facilities will provide positive drainage all the way to the Minnesota River. UTILITIES: Trunk sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and capacity is presently available on Diffley Road approximately 1,000' east of Thomas Lake Road. Figure.2 shows the relationship of this property to the existing trunk sanitary sewer system. This development will require the westerly extension of a minimum 10" diameter sanitary sewer along Diffley Road with an internal 8" lateral distribution system providing for a stub to the north (Francis Franz property) for possible extension. Water main of sufficient capacity and pressure is immediately available along Diffley Road from Johnny Cake Ridge Road to the east. Figure 3 shows the relationship of this development to the existing and proposed trunk water distribution system. The existing 16" trunk water main extending south from Diffley Road along the previous proposed alignment of Johnny Cake Ridge Road will have to be relocated to conform to the proposed new alignment of Johnny Cake Ridge Road and its intersection with Diffley Road. This 16" trunk water main must then continue through this development to the extreme northeast corner for a future extension and connection to Deerwood Drive. A 12" trunk water main extension from the Thomas Lake Road alignment must also connect with this 16" extension to provide an adequate looped trunk system. The future extension and connection to the Deerwood Drive trunk water main will not be necessary due to the fact that the northern boundaries of this proposed development is the dividing line between the high and intermediate pressure zones of the City's overall trunk distribution rAWA 35E DIFFLEY CENTER NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE SIX system. The remainder of the internal lateral distribution system will have to have its size and alignment designed with the final site plan configuration and building plan review to ensure adequate pressure and fire hydrant placement. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: This site will be serviced primarily by County Road 30 (Diffley Road), which is a two-lane rural road section currently scheduled for upgrading by Dakota County in 1988- 89. It is proposed to be constructed as a four -lane divided roadway, with trailways on both sides, providing signalized intersections at Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Thomas Lake Road which will be the two major access points to this proposed development. Any additional accesses onto County Road 30 will be restricted to "right-in/right-out" at specific locations as may be approved by Dakota County. It is recommended that the Johnny Cake Ridge Road extension and the Thomas Lake Road extension, to their mutual intersection, be designed as four -lane divided roadways with a trailway on both sides. The Thomas Lake Road extension to the northeast corner of this development shall continue the trailway system on one side, with the final street width design yet to be determined by the City's thoroughfare plan analysis. In addition, a 32' street shall be stubbed to the north at the northern loop of Johnny Cake Ridge Road, between the two proposed storm water detention _.basins, to provide a secondary outlet for the future development of this adjacent parcel (Francis Franz). While the developer has submitted detailed traffic generation, distribution and impact analysis studies, the staff has not had adequate time to review this complex information to provide adequate comments. However, with the pending improvement of Diffley Road (County Road 30) and Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31), along with the existingI-35E interchange, it is not anticipated that this development will generate traffic problems that cannot be handled by these existing and scheduled future road improvements. However, additional detailed studies will be necessary to verify this along with the final size and alignment of the Thomas Lake Road extension to the north and its ultimate connection to Deerwood Drive. This development shall be responsible for its appropriate financial costs associated with the upgrading of County Road 30, the full cost of the Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Thomas Lake Road extensions and the related trailways, including the north side of Diffley Road. The proposed intersection of the Thomas Lake Road extension at Diffley Road shall line up with the existing Thomas Lake Road intersection to the south. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The final configuration and location of the storm water detention basins incorporating the required storage volumes shall be defined and incorporated on the final plat. 13 35E DIFFLEY CENTER NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE SEVEN Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Thomas Lake Road extensions shall provide for a minimum 100' right-of-way with Thomas Lake Road north of its intersection with Johnny Cake Ridge Road being a minimum 80' right- of-way. Sufficient right-of-way and temporary construction easements shall be dedicated as required by the County for the upgrading of County Road 30. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all easements necessary to extend the sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems to the existing trunk facilities. This developer shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPCA, MWCC, Department of Health, etc.) are acquired prior to final plat approval or building permit issuance, whichever is required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: All property proposed to be developed under this application has been previously assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer under Project #88. Therefore, there are no further assessment obligations for trunk area sanitary sewer. Except for the small triangular residual of Hillandale Addition #1 in the southwestern corner of this development, no trunk area water assessment has previously been levied. Therefore, this development will be responsible for trunk area water assessments at the commercial/industrial rate over the net assessable area excluding public dedicated right-of-way and ponding easements. There is a pending assessment against the northerly most 220' of this proposed development from Project #372 (I-35E/Deerwood Drive). However, this pending assessment was calculated based on a single- family residential useage.. Therefore, this portion will be responsible for the additional assessments associated with the proposed upgrading to commercial/industrial. The remainder of the property to be developed has never been assessed for its trunk area storm sewer obligations. This will also have to be calculated at the commercial/ industrial rates. Appropriate credits will be provided for all dedicated public right-of-way and ponding easements. The lateral benefit assessment from the existing 16" trunk water main along Diff ley Road was deferred at the time of installation until development of the adjacent benefitting properties. Therefore, this development will be responsible for this lateral benefit calculated at half the frontage adjacent to this trunk water main. This development will also be responsible for assessments associated with the future upgrading of Diffley Road and the related trailway. F7 35E DIFFLEY CENTER NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE EIGHT This development will be responsible for all costs associated with the extension of sanitary sewer, watar, storm sewer laterals and internal streets necessary to service this development. The final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the final net assessable area and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. Based on 1986 rates and gross area, less a 20% credit for future right-of-way and easements, these assessment obligations are estimated as follows: Item Quantity Rate Amount P�roj. Code Trunk Area Water 71.0 ac $3,020/ac $214,420 44 Trunk Area Storm Sewer (Zoning Upgrade) 416,756 sf $0.025/sf $ 10,419 Trunk Area Storm Sewer 2,753,055 sf $0.075/sf $206,479 Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main Diffley Road Street Improvement Diffley Road Trail 660 if $19.57/ff $ 18,592 2,574.42 if $78.45/ff $201,963 2,574.42 if $11.81/ff $ 30,404 TOTAL ................................ $682,277 Em 372 372 44 35E DIFFLEY CENTER -NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE NINE CONDITIONS: 35E DIFFLEY CENTER ADDITION 1. A Planned Development Agreement with a specific time period shall be entered into. 2. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 3. All necessary governmental permits shall be obtained. 4. Each lot shall be subject to an individual detailed review. 5:, This P.D. shall be subject to the Park's Dedication fee and reviewed by the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission. 6. Overall landscape and signage plans shall be submitted to ensure project cohesiveness. 7. Entire site shall be graded to the final design with vegetative restoration and required erosion control as a part of the 1st Phase. 8. The final grading plan shall be compatible with County Road 30 plans as approved by Dakota County. 9. The final storm sewer system shall restrict the outflow to the north at 4.0 cfs and to the east at 1.0 cfs with a minimum discharge into the 35E right-of-way as approved by MnDOT, and provide for 65 cfs of flow from the area south of Diffley near Johnny Cake Ridge Road. 10. The trunk storm sewer extensions to the existing City's trunk facilities to the north and east shall be the responsibility of this development. 11. A 10" sanitary sewer will have to be constructed westerly along Diffley Road with an 8" internal lateral system and a stub to the north for future extensions. 12. The existing 16" trunk water main on Johnny Cake Ridge Road south of Diffley will have to be relocated to the new intersection alignment and extended to the northeast corner, along with a 12" trunk extension from Thomas Lake Road. Final size and alignment of the remaining internal water mains will have to meet the, requirements of the City for proper pressure and fire protection. 13. Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Thomas Lake Road extensions shall be a four -lane divided section with trailways on both sides designed to City approved Engineering standards. 14. County Road 30 shall be scheduled for construction to its final design section from I -35E to Johnny Cake Ridge Road prior to final plat approval for the 1st phase and the remainder County road construction concurrent with the final phase. F7 35E DIFFLEY CENTER NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE TEN 15. This development shall dedicate a 100' right-of-way for Johnny Cake Ridge Road and the southerly leg of Thomas Lake Road. The northerly leg of Thomas Lake Road to the northeast corner shall be a minimum of 80'. 16. This development shall provide a stub street to the north from the northerly loop of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. 17. This development shall dedicate right-of-way and construction easements necessary for the upgrading of County Road 30. 18. This development shall be restricted to the two major accesses at Johnny Cake Ridge Road and Thomas Lake Road, with any other secondary accesses being restricted to "right-in/right-out" at locations approved by Dakota County. 19. This development shall dedicate as a part of the final plat all required ponding easements necessary to incorporate the required storage volumes identified in the Master Storm Sewer Plan and generated by this development. 20. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all easements necessary to extend the trunk sanitary sewer and storm sewer system beyond the limits of this development to the existing City trunk sewer systems. 21. This development shall be responsible for the upgrading of trunk area assessments associated with the rezoning and any additional trunk areas, lateral benefit or front footage assessments previously not levied and/or associated with the future upgrading of County Road 30. 22. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all required regulatory agency permits in accordance with their stipulated time frames. 160 LOCATION EXISTING ZONING [/y�+rrY •�; -" a R ua' R «' %R -I 'tom � :Y ,•R -II I -III P R-II4Iilr COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN 4�78� N "''.' ••'I BRB R -III — :i R III .::; : f: :P ".a,`wih.. R—III- i ,.,;; � `�'"•'� � ..:ws R -III .� :A. �� .. 1••. ..�.• '1 ;!Tf. 0 W LL 0 cc 0 - . P LL 0 cc x i LU /o-- 0 3911 9 YeLa L c0 00. LU CD OC.) og LO (1) w 0 ;!Tf. 0 W LL 0 cc 0 - . P LL 0 cc x i LU /o-- 0 3911 9 YeLa ;!Tf. 0 W LL 0 cc 0 - . P LL 0 cc x i LU /o-- 0 3911 9 • C C C ID � ` m m �' CD + COCE- co 0 a� V. 0 o 0� o a o M❑ U = -2 /03 L^, El W O +m Z ° m W o a L C X o u E y W= '�� C° �s S J3 Co /.o U)HU U o U z U li �q r t 0 i CL U a > a o W �- naw w O. �-0 j .q Ian Z I •�®1 map 0 QIll iL�`-�3dld 'S� .3:0 xO ~�o/ z U a L) peoa )IMeH Hoeyg L--. _ _ \ D U ILL_y mfr E'e E am- _<`¢ -•/ fl!/,Ijd.�: N U2 ±'d t�. _om � I• � II I Of G 3 all V III I c` t � ` • �� O ---U � III I oi2 � a�uc l I Soeo"o in /o CL 3 WEm v W ( +r u O i r ,^ o OCU y �_I Li�, 0-2 U row Q I_F 8 x -' > g I -Y e- 10 N i e u O Y O a o g LL , N i { mfr E'e E am- _<`¢ -•/ fl!/,Ijd.�: N U2 ±'d t�. _om � I• � II I Of G 3 all V III I c` t � ` • �� O ---U � III I oi2 � a�uc l I Soeo"o in /o /oJ L c� a pU l i LO cooU ul �hY in a f n laaayd;--- V '9 �� 1p: ' 1 v u •s e go t2 % 9118 1 I I 4 I N v \ � 1 01 1. – v' 0 MMlt VIII � Y. ` ��•'—A•'� I m m O O e O _m�"" AON m �ocA � � m�o. r mm fN'a`aQ0 m e IL Op ED m� 1`o a0 is•:I iib 1 p'3wi0 � pi_- c— 1 L W�1 a c m Q Sgt QO � m ¢a QeSQ Yy NN N y ypp N Y1. Nm yy 1 O 1 YYYY Y^ Y Y Y Y„ Y^ y 0 n LM W ++ `a o u E rJ - ow 1 aaa,_ oU 08 L / f n laaayd;--- V '9 �� 1p: ' 1 v u •s e go t2 % 9118 1 I I 4 I N v \ � 1 01 1. – v' 0 MMlt VIII � Y. ` ��•'—A•'� I m m O O e O _m�"" AON m �ocA � � m�o. r mm fN'a`aQ0 m e IL Op ED m� 1`o a0 is•:I iib 1 p'3wi0 � pi_- c— 1 L W�1 a c m Q Sgt QO � m ¢a QeSQ Yy NN N y ypp N Y1. Nm yy 1 O 1 YYYY Y^ Y Y Y Y„ Y^ y 0 n m m m O 1 •:- 1 m Ui � N F N �{ I y t +S I� y E + I L d �' a E L- a) W W (D Zj M- a) 0130 /o7 e c O� N r8- of rn E m m cn a L EC CL C � a o E c _ �j� NN a � °' 'R AM N W LSM, inU HY + ■8 ani ll� V »- E d E EE —E o`E o :: cn °' U) :3 Naga va.v>. Ccn CN N(n NN VJ •� He •N� H°' a01 a0 3 . 3 w� wc°n' win it (n It U) O � a � a log \v ---------- b3M33 NYS •Lt 'LSIT3 1W • : o'�a�-� 0 wM i.7 L' C �q U E _ $ W a)+� a o U AA oa Lb c� U �YoE b3M33 NYS •Lt 'LSIT3 1W • : o'�a�-� 0 wM i.7 SUBJECT PARCEL 35E-DIFFLEY CENTER ADD. FIG. *1 city of eagan approved: standard . PUBLIC STORM SEWER approveplate: WORKS l(�- . DEPARTMENTJ MASTER PLAN 4� CL l 35E-DIFFLEY CENTER ADD. SUBJECT PARCEL FIG.. #2 city of PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER approved:- plate #d PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN //3 $ f DEPARTMEN In 35E-DIFFLEY CENTER ADD, SUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan PUBLIC $ WORKS DEPARTME WATER MASTER PLAN I1� I R H FIG. *3 approved-:- standard plate #: MEMO TO: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS COLBERT FROM. CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1986 SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL STAFF RESEARCH/REPORT FOR I -35E DIFFLEY CENTER PROPOSAL As a result of our meeting on Thursday, December 4, 1986, it is my understanding that five (5) areas will be studied as requested by the Advisory Planning Commission. Those items are as follows: 1) a thorough Police and Fire review, similar to the race track, 2) a detailed traffic analysis and review of infrastructure by the Director of Public Works and an independent traffic engineer selected by the City, 3) data that states the national average for commercial square footage per person in communities of Eagan's population, 4) what is the proposed tax impact on the community and 5) study alternate zoning trade-offs throughout the community. It is my understanding that the Planning Department will handle Items 1, 3 and 5, Engineering Item 2, and this office will handle Item 4. I met with Mayor Blomquist this past Monday morning and she related a telephone conversation that she had had recently with Planning Commission member Harrison who suggested that some addi- tional land use/zoning research be included relative to the subject parcel and adjacent property. Joe suggested to the Mayor that the City staff compile a brief history of the comprehensive guide planning in the early 1970's and specifically address the subject parcel and adjacent property. Also, property immediately to the south of the proposed Diffley Center was rezoned or the comp guide plan designation was changed from a commercial status. It would be helpful to know when that change occurred and whether it included a trading of zoning/ comprehensive guide plan designation for another parcel of property of equal size. There was some concern apparently in the 1970's that commercial south of the proposed Diffley site would constitute spot zoning and that is why a swap occurred. I would like the Planning Department to compile historical data and include this information in your report and findings. In conclusion, I believe the information is to be compiled no later than mid-January to allow this office an opportunity to review all the information before the final report is completed and distributed to the Advisory Planning Commission for their review. 1 �D City Administrator TLH/kf ��� -;y MEMO TO: PAM MC CREA, CHAIRPERSON AND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 21, 1987 SUBJECT: 35E DIFFLEY CENTER ADDITION At the November 25, 1986 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, this item was continued in order to obtain more specific information regarding the development proposal. The specific requests consisted of six items which are listed below. 1. An analysis of traffic and a traffic study for the area. 2. A legal opinion from legal staff in regard to the impact on the O'Neil action. 3. An analysis by the Eagan Fire and Police Departments. 4. An analysis of the real estate taxes and impacts. 5. Discussion as to an alternative of trading zoning and the legality of such a trade. 6. Information as to appropriate standards for square feet of retail area per capita in a city the size of Eagan and in anticipation of the growth thereof. The Planning Department has tried to coordinate the requests of the Advisory Planning Commission and split the work up into several departments in order to provide the information the APC is seeking. The City staff has been reviewing the traffic study submitted by BRW and the City has hired a consulting engineer, Stigar Roscoe, to review BRW's traffic study to determine the accuracy of this study and, if in fact, all of the impacts have been addressed in regard to BRW's traffic study. Attached with this overview memorandum is a memorandum from the Public Works Department which summarizes the issues regarding utilities as well as the traffic studies and reviews which have transpired in the past sixty days. The Planning Department has been in contact with the City Attorney's office regarding the legal opinion. It was indicated to staff that City Attorney Paul Hauge will be available at the January 27 meeting to answer any questions regarding the legality and impacts on the legal issues regarding this development proposal. The Planning Department has discussed the Diffley project with the Eagan Police and Fire Departments and has requested that they review the project in regard to the project's impact on each of the two departments. Attached are the reports from both the Eagan Fire Marshal and Fire Chief regarding the issues and concerns the Fire Department has in regard to the Diffley 35E proposal. e The Planning Department has worked with the Finance Department and City Administration in order to evaluate the impact of real estate taxes versus level of service that would have to be provided to the Diffley Center and how this would affect the overall community. Attached is the Finance and Administration memorandum, outlining the tax impacts of the Diff ley 35E project. In review of the alternative of trading zoning and the legality of - such a trade, the Planning Department has studied the terminology and concept of such a procedure. The more formal term or concept used to achieve this process is called "Transfer Development Rights." Typically, this process is used in higher density locations, such as major cities, in order to preserve open space and historical structures and to allow the transfer of development rights from the area of preservation to another area, therefore, there is a process which allows the transfer, however, City Ordinances have not been drafted or designed to set guidelines or regulations as to how and what would be allowed to be transferred. Consequently, the concept has some merit, but the implementation process would be very difficult or impractical to consider at this time. Since the November 25 meeting, applications have been submitted to rezone and preliminary plat approximately 24 acres of the Lexington South commercial property to a residential classification. Therefore, the transition is starting to eliminate some of the CSC zoning by a natural process of down zoning. The last issue to be researched was in regard to appropriate standards for square feet of retail area per capita in a city of the size of Eagan and in anticipation of its growth. The City Planning Department has contacted the Metropolitan Council as well as the Urban Land Institute to try to find what a norm or average square foot per capita would be through the metropolitan area and the nation. During this research, it was found that it is very difficult to compare this calculation because so many variables, i.e., market areas, population and demographics differ and categorization of retail groupings vary throughout the country. Staff then tried a new methodology which involved comparisons to the total amount of square footage constructed within the- metropolitan area, as compared to;the total population for this metropolitan area, and also comparisons with other communities based on the information provided by the Metropolitan Council. Attached is a report provided by the Planning Department which analyzes the square footage comparison and the methodology used in each of the four comparisons proposed. Hopefully this provides an overview of the information the City has tried to tie together regarding the specific points requested from November 25. If anyone has additional questions or would like further information, please feel free to contact me. `-�-oR City P anne ir Attachments I/J DCR/jeh T INFRASTURCTURE ANALYSIS: A comparative analysis was performed evaluating the impact of this proposed rezoning for a commercial/ retail development to the current land use guide of medium density residental (0-6 units/acre). While the analysis was performed on both four and six units per acre for the medium density residential scenario, the results presented herein relate to the maximum density of six units per acre to show the most conservative comparison as follows: A. Sanitary Sewer Based on the proposed uses identified in the development application, the commerical/retail development results in a sanitary sewer peak flow rate of 0.532 million gallons per day (MGD) which is equivalent to approximately 5.5 residential units per acre. The existing trunk sanitary sewer system in place approximately 1,000' east of Thomas Lake Road is adequately sized to handle this volume. B. Water The commercial/retail development will result in an average maximum day demand rate of 253 gallons per minute (gpm). This equates to a maximum day water demand requirement of approximately 5.0 residential units per acre. With the existing trunk water main on Diffley Road and its proposed looping with a connection to Deerwood Drive, adequate water supply will be provided for any of the discussed development scenarios. C. Storm Sewer: Although the commercial/retail development will generate approximately 40% greater surface water runoff rates than a medium density residential development, the proposed onsite ponding restricting maximum discharge rates to 4.0 cubic feet per second (cfs) to the north and 1.0 cfs to the east will not result in a negative impact on the trunk storm 'sewer system presently available to service the development of this site. The proposed commercial/retail development will have less of an impact on the existing trunk utility system than the maximum density residential development currently allowed by the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan. Final detail design review and approval will be necessary to ensure adequate service to all facilities proposed to be developed within this site. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS: A comprehensive review of the detailed Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by the developer's consultant (BRW) was performed by an independent consultant traffic engineering firm of Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, Inc., (SRF). Because the SRF review is complex, the 10 point analysis summary enclosed on Exhibit "A" and the following explanation are provided for consideration of this proposed development application. The major difference in the reports relate to the projection of future traffic volumes taking into consideration "background" traffic generated from other offsite developments throughout the City of Eagan and Northern Dakota County. The developer's Traffic Impact Analysis used the Metropolitan Council's population, household and employment projections through the year 2000 for projecting the future traffic volumes and resulting intersection capacities. The City's consultant projected greater future traffic volumes based on a "background" traffic projection rate of 2% per year (1986-1990) and 4% per year (1990-2000) in addition to the traffic generation anticipated with the proposed development. Both consultants compared the traffic generation and intersection capacities of the proposed commercial/retail development with a medium density residential development of a maximum six units per acre. A comparison of other similar developing areas in the metropolitan area and the projected growth rates of population/households/employment result in an average growth rate of 3.9-5.6% per year resulting in an increase of 15-32% of the traffic projections presented in the developer's original Traffic Impact Analysis study. The other area of difference relates to the proportion of ingress/egress movements at peak hours and the resultant critical intersection capacity results. Aside from those two professional approaches to future traffic projections, both consultants concur that while the proposed development will "generate" approximately 600% greater traffic volume than a six unit/acre residential development (32,000 vs. 5,500 per day), with the added impact of additional community "background" traffic projected through the year 2000, the impact on various portions of Diffley Road range from an increase of 19-64% as shown on Exhibit "B" (Figure 5) attached. The results of the various road improvements required by this development and/or projected community growth of "background" traffic are summarized by the attached Exhibit "C". Due to the scheduled improvements of Diffley Road by Dakota County in 1988-89 and the proposed upgrading of Blackhawk Road north of Diffley Road, all of the recommended road improvements necessary to handle the year 2000 projected traffic volumes and intersection capacities can still be designed to be incorporated in the future construction schedules depending upon the type of development ultimately approved. Consequently, residential or commerical development at this site will necessitate roadway improvements by the year 2000. All of these improvements, however, may be incorporated in future construction projects. In this light, residential or commercial development at this site will have no major impacts on the roadway system. The Traffic Analysis Review prepared by Strgar-Roscoe -Fausch is available if further information is necessary. irq W O U U) O a I a u a H to U H H aw Ow a� a Ea aw CQ E-4 cj. w 0 E -t z w u W a Co z W Ei H b v O cd k a) as O O 00 O •r1 0 A . V 0 9:1 .H N x 0 10 sa (a a a>4 >1 al • �' ri O 1-I 44 C)% 0 Q 44 0% W •H r-4 -Q Zf O b b •0 4J a) a +-) >' b a 4J 4-) i1 s~ � O e un 44 a) M > 1 () O Q) H () $4 a) by 9 to O OC4 -r1 04 " .O bN O 4) •r, r-4rof� w pb > m � 0 i4 •r4 d P Q {' aami •� -r0i 0 Q) >. 04 41 r-4 > O N M A W N 04 b 0 tT x U M� AO ON 0 ON 4-) H N t ani v, >t 0 0) sa ri Aa U 0\0 -ri N 44 a) 44ra a) TI )a bl 44-) g w b $4 r I a) x 4J a>i U M 44 :3 N ON 3 (1) O 1A - 1-) x r-1 1n p N U (k w> •r♦ r0 W O )4 X r-1 •,I T) a) awwA Oro 4-) U •,4 ro r~ w 44 to U b U E-4 a) a) r -I r. 1.1G4 >I Q .r, o) 0 c(d 3 44 0 •(0 44 A a ) O A M •ri U O rn ••� a riHA ro�ro O r♦ 1~ 44 •rl H � U (A 0 0 N b a) a) U1 M LO a) O a) co %D CO $4 0A tn 0)N 01040 ld 41 N � a 0 0 U O .. O x lD a Iq 4J r -i � 44 'O Q) t0 O a H W •c O N a) go •� rn010n � 00 (0 • td . 1n \ b7 H CA W rn " M CH' N 10n Wrik U +► w 0 W to 134 $4 O E-4 o .. > �o a) O 4-) co rl CAA 4J A ri >•1 rd .,i ,. •°, ani 4-) tyl � ani •r04-3+ •r+ C7 A to a)x a a 41 W O E4 E1 b 0 tT x U M� AO ON 0 ON 4-) H N t ani v, >t 0 0) sa ri Aa U 0\0 -ri N 44 a) 44ra a) TI )a bl 44-) g aa)) 3 0 "4 p0 c UN N a) 1 -A 00 U •r1 Ol -1 W ON 44 44 r-1 (1) td U >+-> l4 p a) N X44 U 4J O t0 � U a) a) }� > •r1 O (1) (1) 44 04 ri •rI '17 41 N qr e N cd W O '0 W O N •r1 ri a4-1 O a) -r+ ami (a ani I~ 4-) 44 O N O ate) ani W N 3-r > CQ 44 ri ' J b W N N a) >4 .O 0 z $4 a) s~ a) U a) 0 01 r44 4-) N A >190c N r 4 -Jr >4a)v 14 0 > a O 3 O +) .-a b>4roa) M 04H > 0r:;0w a •r, N TI H N (4 4 U) CO 0\ O T r4 w O $4 r I x 4J a>i U M ON 3 (1) 1-) x r-1 •r1 N U (k w> •r♦ r0 W O )4 X r-1 •,I T) a) awwA �cn U w 44 to E-4 a) r. � Q 0 c(d 0 0 A a ) M M V O rn ••� a ra v) aa)) 3 0 "4 p0 c UN N a) 1 -A 00 U •r1 Ol -1 W ON 44 44 r-1 (1) td U >+-> l4 p a) N X44 U 4J O t0 � U a) a) }� > •r1 O (1) (1) 44 04 ri •rI '17 41 N qr e N cd W O '0 W O N •r1 ri a4-1 O a) -r+ ami (a ani I~ 4-) 44 O N O ate) ani W N 3-r > CQ 44 ri ' J b W N N a) >4 .O 0 z $4 a) s~ a) U a) 0 01 r44 4-) N A >190c N r 4 -Jr >4a)v 14 0 > a O 3 O +) .-a b>4roa) M 04H > 0r:;0w a •r, N TI H N (4 4 U) CO 0\ O T r4 C) 12, 1 Mr. Tom Colbert - 4 - January 19, 1987 9. To obtain a more acceptable level of operation in the year 2000, the following geometric improvements are suggested: Assumed improvements in BRW's report o Widening of Diffley Road to four through lanes plus turn lanes o Extension of Thomas Lake Road north to Deerwood Drive o Extension of Johnny Cake Road north into project site o Signalization of Diffley Road with Thomas Lake Road an Johnny Cake Road o Widening of Pilot Knob Road to four through lanes plu turn lanes o Signalization of Pilot Knob Road at Diffley Road o Widening of the north leg of Blackhawk Road/Diffley Roa to 52 feet of width with curb and gutter o Signalization of Diffley Road with Rahn Road an Blackhawk Road Development -Related Additional Improvements Based on Strgar- Roscoe-Fausch, Inc.'s review o Add a second left turn lane to west leg of Diffley Road at Pilot Knob Road o Add a second left turn lane to south leg of Pilot Knob Road at Diffley Road Non -Development Related Additional- Improvements Based on Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, Inc.'s Review o Widen north leg of Blackhawk Road (by the addition of one lane) to provide for two exclusive left turn lanes plus a third lane for through and right turn traffic o A second right turn lane for the southbound ramp from I - 35E will be needed by the year 1995, regardless of development scenario . o The a.m. peak traffic flow will require the addition of a second left turn lane on Diffley for traffic turning to northbound I -35E by the year 2000 FOR:bba 6 MEMO TO: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: DOUG REID, FIRE MARSHAL L' KEN SOUTHERN, FIRE CHIEF DATE: JANUARY 8, 1986 RE: REVIEW OF I -35E, DIFFLEY CENTER In reviewing plans for the above referenced parcel, the Fire Department feels access through the project is satisfactory. The tennis and swim club could present a potential access problem. This lack of access has been improved by installation of an outside remote standpipe system on the northwest end of the building. A requirement of the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code, based upon square footage per building, is that all buildings will be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems. The Fire Department's main concern is the number and locations of water hydrants. In order for fire hydrants to best service the building, they must be located in an area accessible to the Fire Department. It is a requirement of this department that.placement of hydrants will be approved when final plans are submitted. The size of the water main must be calculated for domestic use, automatic fire sprinkler system and the Fire Dept. needs, requiring approval of the Eagan City Engineering Department. Upon receipt of more complete plans, we will designate fire lanes. /z3 V .. •1. 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 police department JAY M.BERTHE Chid of Poiiu PATRICK J. GEAGAN Admini-iw CGpnin itV of Cagan KENO ...i-CPUi. Owrrtion� dpnin 22 January 1987 TO: Dale Runkel, City Planner FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: POLICE INCIDENTS/COMPARABLE SHOPPING CENTERS BLOOMINGTON: I used the Southtown Shopping area for comparison as this includes a Target store. The square footage of this area is approximately 475,000'. The Bloomington Police' Department has a computer system which classifies Calls for Service to each business establishment in the city. They could not retrieve the number of calls in the Southtown Shopping Center area. Although there is considerable traffic in the area of the Southtown Shopping Center, there is no way to determine how many of the accidents in the area are caused by shoppers vs those passing through the area. EDEN PRAIRIE: I .used the Eden Prairie Shopping Center, which also includes a Target Store, for comparison. The square footage of this area is 757,000' which is approximately a third larger in square footage than the proposed Eagan site. Eden Prairie's area is 757,000 square feet and Eagan's proposed area is 525,000 square feet. I spoke to someone at the Eden Prairie Police Department and requested information regarding the Calls for Service they have had because of the shopping center and I was told they would see what information they could come up with for me. As of January 21, 1987, I have not received a response from Eden Prairie. BROOKLYN CENTER: I used the Brookdale Shopping Center for comparison as this THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENG H AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Dale Runkel 22 January 1987 Page Two includes a Target store. The square footage of this area is very close to double, the size of the proposed site in Eagan. The Brooklyn Center area is 1,040,000 square feet and Eagan's is 525,000 square feet. The only information that Brooklyn Center could supply was that during the holiday season (mainly during the- Christmas season), their Calls for Service at the Shopping Center ran approximately 12% of their total calls. During normal months, the calls run approximately 80 of their total calls. In summary, consideration should be given to the manner in which different departments responds to or answer calls. Because of different policies and procedures involved with each and every police department, it is impossible to come up with a uniform way for responding or answering calls. Every police department is required to enter all Class I and Class II crime into the State computer (these crimes would be the type most often generated within a shopping center but not all of them). The way each police department handles a specific situation or incidents varies greatly from department to department. For example, when pursuing a person who writes an NSF check to a retailer, some police departments say the amount must be at least $25.00, some say $50.00, and it can vary up to $300. Now the monthly report comes back to each department and the first department, that had the $25.00 policy, would show quite a few Calls for Service under the Theft statute for NSF checks. The second department that had the $50.00 minimum would have fewer calls, and finally, the last department that had the $300.00 limit, would have very few incidents under the Theft statutes for NSF checks. To carry this a step further, if I now contact the three police departments mentioned above and ask "do you have a lot of theft by NSF checks?", I would get three different responses ranging from "just a few" to "many". The above example of =Theft by NSF check is only one example of the different way in which police departments respond to calls in their area. To mention a couple more: Motor Vehicle Accidents - No Injuries. Some departments do not write accident reports unless injuries are involved. Others write the reports only if they occur on city streets and have the State Patrol write reports for accidents on State highways and the County Sheriff's office write reports for accidents that occur on county roads. In Eagan, we write reports for any type of accident whether it be on a state highway, county road or city street. Which police department would show more acci- dents? Opening Locked Car Doors - Some departments do this and some do not. Eagan does respond to such requests. Dale Runkel 22 January 1987 Page Three And the list goes on and on. It is a known fact that more homes, more businesses, more people and more vehicles in any city will create Calls for Service to any police department. The number of Calls for Service would e impossible to predict. M. Berthe - JMB/vk El MEMO TO: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 22, 1987 SUBJECT: ANALYSIS OF REAL ESTATE TAXES AND IMPACTS/ I -35E DIFFLEY CENTER ADDITION The Director of Finance was asked to evaluate the real estate tax impact on the City if the Diffley Center Addition were approved. It was necessary to make several assumptions to determine a market value valuation. According to your office, the building program is $20,000,000; other improvements at $10,000,000; land and utilities at $15,000,000; and soft costs are estimated at $5,000,000 for a total project cost of $50,000,000. It can be assumed that the actual market valuation --on the conservative side --would be approximately 50%, estimating the market value at $25,000,000. Please review the following data: Building and Land Valuation Assume $25,000,000 Market Valuation: 1985/1986 Taxes Payable (.288877) Fiscal Disparities $60,000 @ 28% $24,940,000@ 43% Balance Vnl nn+-; r%" $16,800 10,724,200 $10,741,000 Total Valuation $3,102,828 $7,638,172 $10,741,000 Mill Rate .107553 .104506 Taxes $333,718 $798,235 $1,131,953 Balance Only $ $798,235 Total Eagan 20.1 $160,445 $227,523 Met Council .6 4,789 6,792 Mosquito Control .4 3,193 4,528 Transit 2.5 19,956 28,299 Dakota County., 21.0 55.4 167,629 237,710 442,223 627,101 100.0 $798,235 $1,131,953 X2-7 STAFF MEMO JANUARY 22, 1987 PAGE TWO Taxes Per Million Dollars of Market Value Eagan Met Council Mosquito Contro� Transit Dakota County Rosemount School District $1,131,953 $9,101 272 181 1,132 9,508 25,084 $45,278 Assuming the market value may be higher or lower, the taxes generated, including fiscal disparities, are $45,278 per $1,000,000 of market value. The total taxes after fiscal disparities for distribution to all taxing authorities is $798,235 per year which would generate a new tax distribution for the City of Eagan in the amount of $160,445. These tax dollars would increase the valuation base which either allows taxing authorities the ability to raise more dollars for capital and operating expenses without any adjustment to the mill rate or reduce the mill rate assuming no changes in services. The aforementioned information addresses the analysis of real estate taxes and its impact based on the proposed Diffley Center. There is no consideration given in this study on the overall community impact of other commercial centers. City Administrator TLH/kf fv$ Ya-1-*VLAr✓ 1 of MEMO TO: CHAIRPERSON PAM MCCRAE & PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS FROM: STEVEN SCHWANRE, PLANNER I DATE: JANUARY 22, 1987 SUBJECT: PER CAPITA RETAIL SPACE STUDY (BEITER COMPANY — DIFFLEY CENTER PROJECT) Please find enclosed the per capita retail space study described in Planning Director Runkle's summary memorandum. This study has been prepared pursuant to the Planning Commission's request at the November, 1986, Planning Commission meeting. As stated in the minutes for the November, 1986, Planning Commission meeting, Planning Commission members requestedinformation concerning "appropriate standards" for square feet of retail area per capita in a city such as Eagan. The purpose of this memorandum and corresponding study is to compare the City of Eagan's per capita retail space with that of similar cities located in the twin cities metropolitan area. The enclosed study also attempts to project the growth in retail space that the City of Eagan can reasonably expect in the future given that there are no artificial barriers to commercial development such as infrastructure limitations that might be placed on the City by various regional bodies. A unique feature of this study is that data regarding retail space only includes those facilities located in shopping centers of at least 10,000 square feet. No freestanding retail facilities have been considered in this study. The primary purpose for such an approach is to measure.and thereby analyze the exclusive impact of retail shopping centers. The enclosed is not to be construed, compared to, nor interpreted as a retail market study. No effort was made to ascertain the market capacity for retail services in the Eagan quadrant of the twin cities metropolitan. area. Because this is not a market study, absorption rates, financial solvency of existing or potential retail business, and related policy issues have not been addressed. Rather, the question to be addressed by the material contained herein is whether Eagan's retail space per capita is below, above, or equal to that of an average retail space per capita of comparable sample cities. General Conclusions The planning staff has reached several general conclusions concerning retail space.in the City of Eagan based on discussions with planning professionals and on material contained within this study. The first conclusion is that there is no "appropriate standard" for the amount of retail square footage a specific city should have. Rather, in conversations with officials at the Urban Land Institute, the American Planning Association, the Metropolitan Council of the twin cities area, and planning officials from several metropolitan cities, the consensus is that PAGE 2 the extent to which a city will experience retail development is based on a variety of complex and inter -related circumstances. The most essential variables for retail development is location within a metropolitan area, accessability to major interstate freeways and trunk highways, population and employment, and proximity to significant regional facilities such as the Twin Cities Metropolitan Airport. Because the City of Eagan has immediate access to the Metropolitan Airport; has uninhibited access to two interstate freeways, four state trunk highways, and several major county roadways; and is projected to have a significant population and employment base; the Planning Department believes that the City of Eagan can reasonably expect significant retail development in the near future. The second conclusion to be reached from this study is that, for the moment, retail space per capita in the City of Eagan is below the average and the composite retail space per capita of sample cities. Using Metropolitan Council data and including only retail space found in shopping centers, the City of Eagan has a retail space per capita of 12.2 square feet. Based on the scenarios described below, the closest composite of retail space per capita is 25.2 per square feet and the closest average of retail space per capita is 26 square feet. The final conclusion to be reached by this study is illustrated in Table D concerning the growth potential of retail space in the City of Eagan. Based on this material, the City of Eagan can theoretically expect a retail base between 893,000 and nearly 1.1 million square feet given a population of approximately 40,000 people. Summary_Of Findings The retail space per capita study is based on the analysis of four scenarios regarding retail development. The purpose of this section of the memorandum is to briefly describe the approach of each scenario and their respective findings. Scenario #1 is contained in Table A and titled "cities with similar characteristics." This approach attempts to identify physical and natural characteristics which the City of Eagan possesses and by its very nature may attract retail development. The hypothesis is that it would be appropriate to look at the retail space per capita of cities which exude similar characteristics and as a consequence attract retail development. The physical and natural characteristics examined in this scenario include proximity to the Minneapolis/Twin Cities Metropolitan Airport, population and employment bases, and access to major regional roadways. This approach makes no attempt to control for the amount of development activity a particular city is experiencing. As Commission members will see, this scenario includes cities experiencing significant development activity such as Burnsville and Brooklyn Park, and cities that are fully developed such as Richfield, St. Louis Park, and Edina. 130 PAGE 3 The City of Eagan's retail space per capita is 12.2 square feet. The composite for scenario #1 is 25.2 square feet with an average of 26.5 square feet. Please refer to Table A. Scenario #2 is a sample of cities experiencing significant development activity. This approach attempts to control for the type and amount of development activity experienced by sample cities, ostensibly including only those cities which experience growth comparable to the City of Eagan. The hypothesis is that the retail space per capita of developing cities should be separately analyzed from that of fully developed cities. As in scenario #1, the City of Eagan retail space per capita is 12.2 square feet. The composite of scenario #2 is 28 square feet with an average of 26 sqaure feet. Please refer to Table B. Scenario #3 examines the retail space per capita of cities which presently have facilities similar in size and function to the Di`ffley Center and to what the City of Eagan can reasonably expect in terms of future retail facilities. This approach is a deviation from scenarios 1 and 2 in that the focus of analysis is on the function and size of retail facilities and less on the specific characteristics of sample cities. As in scenario #1, this approach includes a wide variety of cities experiencing varying degrees of development activity. Again, the City of Eagan retail space per capita is 12.2 square feet. The composite for scenario #3 is 30 square feet per capita with an average of 33.4 square feet per capita. Please refer to Table C. Scenario #4 addresses the Commission's question regarding what can be anticipated for future retail development activity. This approach attempts to project the amount of retail space the City of Eagan can expect given particular assumptions concerning population base, median sales volume per square feet of gross leasible area, and the percentage of Eagan residents who will patronize Eagan retail facilities. Again, I must stress that this approach makes no attempt to replicate the detailed analysis found in responsible retail market studies and should not be construed as a statement concerning the absorption rate of the retail market area of Eagan. Further, the population base contained herein is exclusively for the City of Eagan and should not be confused with a market population base that has been presented by proposers of the Diffley Center project or that may be presented by future retail developers. Table D indicates that the growth in Eagan's population base will allow for a corresponding growth in retail development. It is anticipated that with a population base of approximately 40,000 people, the City can reasonably expect approximately 893,000 square feet of retail space, or a retail space per capita of approximately 22.3 square feet. This data is presented in ranges so that the Commission understands retail development cannot be based on absolute assumptions. What one retail developer may view as a saturated market, might very well be viewed by another 13 PAGE 4 as a prime retail opportunity. Therefore, the Planning Department believes this material is best presented in a relative fashion. I trust the enclosed information is suffici.ent to address the Planning Commission's concerns related to the retail space per capita in the City of Eagan when compared to other metropolitan cities and to what the City of Eagan may be able to expect in way of future retail development activity. As mentioned, the City of Eagan can reasonably expect to experience continued, and perhaps accelerated, retail development activity. This is based on the conclusion that the City of Eagan has all the necessary physical and natural characteristics to attract retail development, and in terms of retail space per capita is below the average and com osi --of sample cities considered in this study. V- anner I SS/jj I81✓ TABLE A CITIES WITH (1) SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS SAMPLE RETAIL (2) CITY (3) RETAIL / CITIES SQ. FT. POPULATION CAPITA EAGAN 430,300 35,311 12.2 BROOKLYN PARK 362,925 51,424 7.1 EDINA 1,752,000 45,523 38.5 MINNETONKA 2,376,983 42,636 55.8 ST. LOUIS PARK 927,000 42,713 21.7 RICHFIELD 380,675 36,891 10.3 BLOOMINGTON 1,120,000 84,289 13.3 BURNSVILLE 2,254,000 42,583 52.9 TOTAL 9,603,883 381,370 25.2 (1) THIS COMPARISON INCLUDES THOSE CITIES WHICH HAVE SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS AS THE CITY OF EAGAN IN TERMS OF ROADWAY ACCESS, POPULATION AND EMPLOY- MENT BASES, AND PROXMITY TO THE MINNEAPOLIS/ST.PAUL AIRPORT. (2) THESE FIGURES COMPRISE RETAIL SPACE FOUND ONLY IN SHOPPING CENTERS OF AT LEAST 10,000 SQUARE FEET, AND DO NOT INCLUDE FREESTANDING RETAIL FACILITIES. (3) APRIL 1, 1986 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ESTIMATE. /5E TABLE E CITIES EXPERIENCING (1) DEVELOPMENT SAMPLE RETAIL (2) CITY (3) RETAIL / CITIES SQ. FT. POPULATION CAPITA EAGAN 430,300 --------------------- 35,311 12.2 APPLE VALLEY 394,775 28,538 13.8 BURNSVILLE 2,254,000 42,583 52.9 WOODBURY 102,000 14,520 7.0 MAPLE GROVE 509,500 30,969 16.5 PLYMOUTH 191,248 41,207 4.6 COON RAPIDS 1,004,300 42,900 23.4 EDEN PRAIRIE 1,262,000 26,214 48.1 MINNETONKA 2,376,983 42,636 55.8 TOTAL 8,525,106 8,525,106 304,878 28.0 (1) THIS COMPARISON ONLY INCLUDES "DEVELOPING CITIES." "DEVELOPING CITIES" ARE DEFINED HEREIN AS THOSE CITIES LOCATED IN THE DEVELOPING AREA OF THE "METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK" AS PUBLISHED BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL. PLEASE REFER TO THE "GEO- GRAPHIC POLICY AREAS" SECTION, PP. 13-20. (2) THESE FIGURES INCLUDE RETAIL SPACE LOCATED IN SHOP- PING CENTERS OF AL LEAST 10,000 SQUARE FEET. FREESTANDING RETAIL FACILITIES ARE NOT INCLUDED. (3) APRIL 1, 1986 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ESTIMATE. /.3 � TABLE C CITIES WITH LIKE (1) SHOPPING FACILITIES SAMPLE RETAIL (2) CITY (3) RETAIL / CITIES SQ. FT. POPULATION CAPITA EAGAN 430,300 ----------------- 35,311 12.2 ST. ANTHONY 567,386 7,641 74.3 ROSEVILLE 2,166,647 35,178 61.6 BLOOMINGTON 1,120,000 84,289 13.3 COON RAPIDS 1,004,300 42,900 23.4 CRYSTAL 325,000 24,628 13.2 BURNSVILLE 2,254,000 42,583 52.9 SHAKOPEE 172,500 11,236 15.4 RICHFIELD 380,675 36,891 10.3 WEST ST. PAUL 665,500 18,134 36.7 ROBBINSDALE 470,000 14,212 33.1 MINNETONKA 2,313,983 42,636 54.3 TOTAL 11,870,291 11,870,291 395,639 30.0 (1) THIS COMPARISON INCLUDES CITIES WITH COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS AS DEFINED BY THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE. PER THIS DEFINITION, COMMUNITY SHOP- PING CENTERS:RANGE IN SIZE FROM 100,000 TO 300,000 SQUARE FEET. REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS RANGE IN SIZE FROM 300,000 TO 900,000 SQUARE FEET. (2) THIS DATA ONLY INCLUDES RETAIL SPACE LOCATED IN SHOPPING CENTERS OF AT LEAST 10,000 SQUARE FEET. FREE- STANDING RETAIL FACILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN CONSIDERED. (3) APRIL 1, 1986 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ESTIMATE. 135 POTENTIAL RETAIL SPACE ( 1 ) IN THE CITY OF EAGAN EAGAN RANGE OF (1) POPULATION RETAIL SQ. FT. 40,000 893,280 - 1,071,936 50,000 1,116,600 - 1,339,920 60,000 1,339,920 - 1,607,904 70,000 1,563,240 - 1,875,888 80,000 1,786,560 - 2,143,872 90,000 2,009,880 - 2,411,856 100,000 2,233,200 - 2,679,840 (1) THE "RANGE OF RETAIL SQUARE FEET" IS CALCULATED BY DIVIDING MEDIAN SALES VOLUME PER SQUARE FOOT INTO TOTAL RETAIL DOLLARS GENERATED PER PERSON PER YEAR IN THE CITY OF EAGAN. THIS IS THAN MULTIPLIED BY 50% TO OBTAIN THE LOW NUMBER IN THE RANGE. THE HIGH NUMBER IN THE RANGE IS OBTAINED BY USING 60%. (2) RETAIL DOLLARS GENERATED PER PERSON PER YEAR HAS ASSUMED TO BE $5583 (19841S FIGURE WITH AN INFLATION FACTOR OF 1.03). (3) MEDIAN SALES VOLUME PER SQUARE FOOT FOR REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY FACILITES HAVE BEEN AVERAGED AND RESULT IN $125 PER SQUARE FOOT. i3� Target Stores 33 South Sixth Street P.O. Box 1392 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440-1392 Telex No. 6879103 The Honorable Beatta Blomquist, Members of the Eagan City Council Members of the Eagan Planning Commission City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Madam Mayor, Councilmembers, and Planning Commission Members: Target Stores (a division of Dayton Hudson Corporation) is a Minnesota based corporation. Over the past several years, Target has achieved an outstanding success record unique in the retailing industry. Target has also earned an excellent reputation for community involvement and participation. Target's successes are the result of developing a system of thorough and in-depth market studies and community analysis. These guidelines and standards have been applied not just to the City of Eagan, but to every location Target has selected in the entire country. These guidelines have been used to analyze every site in Eagan, including Town Centre, Cliff Lake -Galleria and Lexington and Diffley. The proposed center at 35-E and Diffley is the only site in Eagan that satisfied Target's standards, no other site is acceptable. We encourage the staff and various governmental bodies to carefully study the 35-E Diffley Center submission. We would anticipate that an objective analysis of the application by the city will arrive at the same conclusion we reached and the consumer, the citizens of.Eagan, will be best served by Target's location in this center. Very truly yours, Ed�Ar'd J. Bierman Vice President Target Stores /jr /37 A Division of the Dayton Hudson Corporation Burnsville Midwest ffiw q 1001,!�t Wim noRmmOAle J%TrDQ a hm',Fc; 0 NORT14 STAR RICHFIELD Sauthdale OAKDALE Ral St. The Honorable Mayor Blomquist City Council Members City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Madam Mayor and Council Memb�J_J. You have on file my letter of Sept. 22, 1986 discussing the important site location characteristics of the Diffley-35E Center proposal. A copy of the letter is attached and I call your atten- tion to the third paragraph of that letter. Additionally I com- mented on the good relationship we have had with the developer: Thorson-Cornwell-Klohs, people of highest integrity with an excel- lent long-term reputation. We have worked closely with the developer, giving our input for- establishing the site plan requirements. In our portion of the plan, we will build our newly designed 170,000 Sq. Ft. facility. The specific location, the freeway exposure and all other aspecs of the plan satisfies our criteria for our participation in the, development. We have reached agreement on price and terms with the developers. We eagerly look forward to participating in this mixed-use development along with Target and the other anchors who wish to be -at this location. Simply put, for our proposed use, this is the pre-eminent site in your city due to freeway visibility, direct access off a major county road and its central location within the City of Eagan. In closing, all of our comments in my letter of Sept. 22, 1986 still stand. Jerry Noyce will again attend your Planning Commission and Council meetings in January and February and we look forward to being a part of the Diffley-35E development in Eagan. I ask for your support of this project. Ver truly yours, M ry Wolfenson B1ARNSVILLE RACQUETBALL CENTER - 14600 BURN-HAVVMPDeri VE - BURNSVILLE. MN 55337 - 435-7127 encl. MIDWEST TEt:NIS CENTER - 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD - EDINA, MN 55435 - 835-3113 NORM IANDALE RACQUET and S'.'✓IMA CLUB - 6701 WEST 78TH'STREET - BLOOMINGTON. MN 55435 - °44.2434 NORTHWEST RACQUET and SV✓ M CLUB • 5525 CEDAR LAKE ROAD • ST. LOUIS PARK. MN 55416 - '346-5474 NORTH STAR TENNIS CLUB - 1621 VERNON AVENUE SOUTH - ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 - 544.4236 RICHFIELD RACQUET CLUB - 7620 PENN AVENUE SOUTH - RICHFIELD, MN 55423 - 861.4528 SOUTHDALE RACQUET CLUB - 6950 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH - EDINA, MN 55423 - 920.6530 OAKDALE RACQUET CLUB - 1201 SOUTH FORD ROAD - MINNETONKA. MAN 55343 - 546-2231 98TH STREET RACQUET and SWIM CLUB - 1001 W. 98TH STREET - BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 - 884.1612 HIWAY 100 NORTH FRANCE - 4001 LAKE BREEZE AVENUE - BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 - 535-3571 i38 Midwest noT manbAl.., 1-1 ST RICHFIELD Scut da !° OAKDALL �+ghGi• September 22, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges City Administration Eagan, Minnesota Subject: Northwest Racquet, Swim and Health Club I -35E and Diffley Road, Eagan, Minnesota Dear Mr. Hedges: Northwest Racquet, Swim and Health Club would like to open a 170,000 sq. ft. recreational facility in Eagan in 1988. We have selected your city because of the opportunity to be a part of the planned Diffley Road - 35E Center. The club will offer tennis, racquetball, aerobics, swimming, nautilus, jogging, basketball, volleyball and many other activities. Northwest now has ten clubs in the Metro area and is just beginning construction of an eleventh club in Eden Prairie. The Diffley Road - 35E Center allows us excellent freeway exposure which we consider essential, plus easy and quick access to Eagan, Apple Valley, West Saint Paul and East Bloomington. The opportunity to be part of a major shopping center is also a key to our early success. We are very familiar with the developers and the fine quality of their projects. Because of the developers and the quality of their proposed center, we have advanced our plans to build in the City of Eagan. Northwest Racquet, Swim and Health Clubs are known for their first class facilities, well trained instructors and immaculately clean appearance. So that you can know us better, I'd encourage you to visit our recently opened Highway 100 North France Club in Brooklyn Center. Jerry Noyce, our director of tennis, or I will be pleased to take you on a personal tour or you are welcome to tour the club on your own at any time. This facility is our new prototype and I believe you'll find a visit extremely interesting and informative. BURNSVILLE RACQUETBALL CENTER • 14600 BURN -HAVEN DRIVE • BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 • PHONE 435-7127 MIDWEST TENNIS CENTER • 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD • EDINA, MN 55435 • PHONE 835.3113 NORMANDALE RACQUET and SWIM CLUB • 6701 WEST 78TH STREET BLOOMINGTON, KIN 55435 • PHONE 944-2434 NORTHWEST RACQUET and SWIM CLUB • 5525 CEDAR LAKE ROAD ST. LOUIS PARK, KIN 55416 • PHONE 546.5474 NORTH STAR TENNIS CLUB • 1621 VERNON AVENUE SOUTH • ST. LOUIS PARK. MN 55416 • PHONE 544-4236 RICHFIELD RACQUET CLUB • 7620 PENN AVENUE SOUTH • RICHFIELD, %IN 55423 • PHONE 8614528 SOUTHDALE RACQUET CLUB • 6950 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH • EDINA. MN 5523 • PHONE 920.6530 OAKDALE RACQUET CLUB • 1201 SOUTH FORD ROAD • MINNETONKA. KIN 55343 • PHONE 546-223 98TH STREET RACQUET and SWIM CLUB • 1001 W. 98TH STREET • BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 0 PHONE 884-1612 I Mr. Tom Hedges September 22, 1986 Page Two In closing, we are very enthusiastic about opening an athletic club in your city and we hope you are equally enthusiastic about us. Our long affiliation with the developers assures us we will be part of a quality project and we are looking forward to a long and successful relationship. MW/jk ve truly yours, Ma Wo l nson er -/0 METROPOLITAN AREA RETAIL PURCHASES AND HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 1985 (Per Household) Estimated Annual RETAIL PURCHASES Shoppin- Goods General Merchandise Group $ 1,902 Apparel and Accessory 685 Furniture, Home Furnishings and Equipment 597 Miscellaneous Shopping Goods Stores 1,248 Subtotal $ 4,432 Convenience Goods Food Stores $ 3,041 Drug and Proprietary Stores 391 Liquor Stores 386 Florists 55 Subtotal $ 3,873 Eating and Drinking Places $ 1,498 Total $ 9,803 HOUSEHOLD INCOME Median $ 27,887 Average 33,589 Source: 1982 Retail Census, Urban Decisions, Inc. and James B. McComb & Associates. V( Table MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL SMSA SHOPPER. GOLDS RETAIL SALES 10,82, ESTIMATED 1985 AND FORECAST 1990 (In Millions or Dollars) Total Shopper Goods/ Other Stores All Major Shopping Areas Minneapolis CBD St. Paul C3D All Major Retail Centers Total Pr imary Shopping Areas Minneapolis C3D St. Paul C3D Maior SnouOinz Centers3/ Total 1982 Actual 1985 1990 Estimate Forecast/ S 3,026.7 S 3,710 S 4,450 889.0 1,062 1,275 254.3 340 410 62.9 78 9I 1.820.5 2.230 2.674 S 2,137.7 S 2,648 S 3,175 254.3 S 340 S 410 62.9 78 92 1'.005.7 1.299 1.558 S 1,322.9 S 1,717 S 2,059 I/ Expressed in constant 1985 dollars. 2/ Includes St. Croix County in Wisconsin. 3/ Souchdale, Ridsedale, Brookdale, Rosedale, Burnsville Mall, Maplewood Mall, Eder Prairie Mall and Northtown. Source: James B. McComb & Associates James B. McComb & Associates :n ^rnn•rr� I'!a ro�n.......n. 'nR Map 1 SHOPPING CENTER LOCATIONS ' 1.5 MILE TRADE AREAS MLNUUTA _ 4 - —��- 1 Q e _ � ,. :. � .. � VIII! �i Iilll i%� `• .j��'t\� jd- � �.� ,) .�i '�o= ONE n4K R _ ./� :;r,,�,''�� i - e ,Y,�,2_✓•:� •j .i..., rrr,,.....11'r - H.CGHw i .; a �%r`,� : , 9 :� .:��� _ Ali •�I, I •��_.:,. ��;�. �: Town Centre YA NKEE I Cj Ic Ln epr 24 111{ •�� ti _ I.• .;�' , 2 COUNTY • ROAD'. 30 I �'� J I � 'o '•r:,; :� Tri Land ••i E 0. w : -i ::.'` •::•.�I l I F ROAD ft- •I 34 EE}} .S'E- - - I J- I 7u• y,•I;�I •.r�� (' � ,..,. ...,._.. � I !ter •���.1 ! (:.•ILI:��_i�t• /) If+, .,1:. ' , ^ �. v - .POSEUOUNf APVLE VOLLEY ; _ 1 1 _ l9(3 Map 2 SHOPPING CENTER LOCATIONS 2.0 MILE TRADE AREAS uu I, k "I, I Vill J( ....... .. � ONE CA IJ J11 7 Town Centre -YANKEE z . 73. Tj W.z % . Ln 0 -Z 24 0 COUNTY. ROAD* 30 Tri Land— 7 3: :r HDG tf LI F 0 A J. az J4 i. F0SEIA0UNf' APPLE VALLEY 14 Map 3 SLOPPING CENTER LOCATIONS 1.5 MILE TRADE AREAS .,.,.� .. � f� �••/ 1,..1.44 _ 1 ' B � I - •� � • t � j4 �%..1;1•a � II � I I•�+ 1. I•�3 l�li.�' +-' '.� 11'� 1� ' �� I • iEaj •l•r•�.'•-nt' +•: ..r. I.4• ..- •.'. -tN• ; -4 f, ''• i� '_ .- _ ')"• _ 1�ONE OAK 17•'-' n - - - .•rr`.l ..£^111111 t��• �VS�wll �� •il I Si` •HIGkW4 Y' Ll NKEE Town Centre j; >y• .�NJ LI f Inti . ,' -� 1• .�'l G� :A� • i Ul z. ' .0 CUNT'Y.� ROAD TO Land _ .I r Hp :.i. ....." _..lr '•' �•.TI L I d F O A D - .s 1 1.) �.,1,• � 12 .11 1,l ,.S')_ =,�•1 1 1 '.'e. i.a • 1.1 . -�., f � r—...-._ -.`_� .�.�.. � �. v � •-• �ROSEMOl1Nr " PILE YAILEY �• --•--^ IV5 Map 4 SHOPPING CE TER LOCATIONS 2.0 MILE TRADE AREAS r pYaIT ' r.......... ... .[OFJE _OAK' ROAD) - 51 • _ `- , fir, _�_L• 7 •( `sties ��' �' � I f �nrw , 1 ��\ .�I^'. Town Centre y-& N zJill ; lLn 2 24 ii�;ea• -. i z _ -�—� °• COUNTY ROAD' 30 1 Tri Land ,I HDG ��' '�•'t' � , -,: •w L���_�l ►:'�-.- . L .+-; amu;. IW + _ !..':AOSENOUNf'�I ig APPLE v�ICEY 1 �' j` E m 4-) OD ra a) C -o a) 0o00 0 0002 o O O row 0000 0 0000 O O O CJ -j O O VI O 0 0 Ln Un 0 O O 0 CO H a) ill ^ M 0 Ca ca a) O w H 0*, %.DMr4O "0 %.OMN I �'O n Ln CO CL CU O " M N 00 CV 1-1 -1 Cf) 00 N (O1 W 04a 01 w U O O r --I U-% trl Lr) N 7 v I'D N N Ln �10 N •.D cn C u'1 -4 r� H 7 Q) P4 a) V>- jf. th N4-1 O Ln O Ln O U11 t!1 O tP1 CO M O ww ON r` r` I'D tr) r` I'D r` N () 7 O C) r -I r - -f N N -4 r1 r4 r1 r-' =4 V)- tn- p W C/] James B. McComb & Associates 1�17 Consultants in Economics, Development and Govemment Finance D a) 4-1CU .', U O 5 O U U E GO a) 6 CO N U w 0 U] OD C •� r` ND O O M O .D ON M IT \D M r -i 00 r-1 Lr) %.D %.D N N M ill r� M 0 Ca ca a) O M O c•M N 0*, S M O r* u'1 r` N 01 w U O O r --I U-% trl Lr) %�D I'D N N Ln �10 N •.D u'1 -4 r� 7 V>- jf. th ww 3 W p W a.a Pa c (L) (1) W COQ C•+ 0000 M 0000 O u'1 M UC:4 bDw M 00 04 00 00 ',D NNNN (N r- It z roro-0 P-40 Wzcn Ena x U W 0� G H U)W e-, Zr M M �D r` O M a% r- O u'1 '�j a) � -,7 �O V) N M %D r -i \O r- r- r - O 'I ca O U 0 U OO r-1Ln%D%D O 04-4000 N M lD Q. pa w a4 u% N M M r -q '-1 N 00 c -- w U) 0 CD C V1 CO .0 z b Q) p cn w U •r+ 7 -0 Q1 Mww0 x to •ra O O • C -d cn a) C� cn •r+ C7 W U) O C •• = U x C .�4 O •ri t)) U U .,qr-I c� -v w a n A OL a) CO o a) f o CO :3 C O r-4 r-{ 7 cn O a) d0 H 11 M (1) L 1! •� C O . a C w w --w .0 C b• 4 CD O O •ra a) c0 C (1) O •ra a) O .0 7 v" En C CL $a a cn -0 r-4 9 O EU H •H (1) CL� O 41 'A CO C w 0 o 0¢w0 •H � o.a a O U V] CD E-4 James B. McComb & Associates 1�17 Consultants in Economics, Development and Govemment Finance D a) 4-1CU .', U O 5 O U U E GO a) 6 CO N U w 0 U] a) � an � v n u oC) 00 0 0000 0 0 0 ca w 0000 0 0000 0 0 0 G,_., 0000 0 000Ln U-)�n 1-4 o ro P a) r-1 - Un ., - a) o W0 w Ln r-�rn� : �aLn 't � w ao Cu 0. M 3 O NMMN N Mr-+ -qN 00 N M W 0.,a r1 N O O O -A L0 �-0 '.0 M 7 t- cV N -T n M 00 W 1:14 V) V7 00 6+ 7 v p.i U? V1 rh ch G4 F w tj OD Lr) 0 n O Ln u 1 O U -i N ca 0 W W ONt-r.O u1�%.0r- N Q) 7 O M ri r -i N N i-•4 -4 r -t r4 VW t r ✓� tn- O W James B. McComb & Associates /4 consultants in Economics, Development and Govemment Finance v ro .r., u 0 ro CO 5 O U u E ai Q) a CO n a) U $4 0 0 M an •r -I '--1 00 00 CO O Ln O N tr) N 00 O G U) N /1 M T 00 ON 1-4 IZT ON M � r-1 N Un Lr) ro cn a) o u-) 0 u1 N Ln r� .� -+ --� M rn ON ta0.� 3 O •• M ro u O O O -A L0 �-0 '.0 00 t- cV N -T n M 00 W 1:14 00 7 p.i U? V1 rh ch G4 F W W � W O W �+ R+ G (1) a) o w M 4 w 0000 CO 0000 0 u, Ln u x w to ro 00 N 00 00 N N N N N t- -t z¢ ro ca �a wEcn v? a U W cl! .a oo AO., •� Lr) 00 %0 1.0 Ln u, r- N <t m rl_ O H U) t4 /1 r -I 00 M %.0 O N "I' �O N to M O ro (1) O ON � N 00 u1 n M —1 n Lr) :r u•I u Ra U 0 0 r• -I O 00 r- 00 00 M N 0 ►n -It 00 %D CO o Cr) —1'-+ci 00 M w a r -a 1-4 cn a rrr yr ;rr in- crr Q G � sa � ro •r•� 3 m G r0 CO mNr.4O x ND •r4 O o • G -o ro a) O •� aEna C ro -kA 0 v o to a) o G •• .n u x G •� O •H d) U U •H r-1 w a wdLZ 0. M r -I o a) a r -t a) CO o z z a) O ro :3 U La 1J u W= 4j V] G O r-4 r4 7 V) O a) a0 P 41 bc ro a) a + :j •-+ G O .n G P P •ri P-0 G G "0 •r•+ CO :3 a •H 0 ro t a 7 •, � (L) o m a a" Cn G a w En 10 r-4'. > 0 ro N •r+ (1) 0.0 r -I ro r✓ wWMa o c7<wo 4I o 01 U V) CO H James B. McComb & Associates /4 consultants in Economics, Development and Govemment Finance v ro .r., u 0 ro CO 5 O U u E ai Q) a CO n a) U $4 0 0 M RESOLUTION EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION BIETER COMPANY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF EAGAN January 27, 1987 WHEREAS, applications were submitted to the City of Eagan by Thorson, Cornwell, Klohs/Bieter Company for the development of approximately 91 + acres at the northeasterly intersection of I -35E and Diffley Road in the City of Eagan for multi -use commercial center called 35E Diffley Center; and WHEREAS, the applications include rezoning from A (Agricultural) and RB (Roadside Business) to RSC -PD (Regional Shopping Center - Planned Development) to include several commercial uses within the development; and WHEREAS, in addition, a revision to the Comprehensive Guide Plan for the parcel is required in order to change the Guide Plan from R -II Residential and P (Parks & Public Facilities), to Regional Shopping Center use; and WHEREAS, an application for preliminary plat approval has been submitted in order to subdivide the property for such commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed uses for the property include a tennis and swim club, Target store, home improvement center, grocery store, office buildings, and miscellaneous retail uses; and WHEREAS, the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission at its regular meeting on November 25, 1986, held a public hearing concerning the application, at which time the Planning Commission members reviewed the applications in detail; and WHEREAS, representatives of the applicant were present and submitted oral and written presentations to the Advisory Planning Commission members, requesting favorable action on behalf of the Commission; and i�9 WHEREAS, the Advisory Planning Commission at its November 25, 1986 meeting, continued the hearing and requested further information from staff; and WHEREAS, the Advisory Planning Commission reconvened its public hearing at the January 27, 1986 regular APC meeting, with all members present, at which time the applicant made a presentation. The staff responded to the concerns of the Advisory Planning Commission and a large number of concerned persons were in attendance; and WHEREAS, property owners in the general area of the proposed 35E Diffley Center appeared in person .and submitted written comments regarding the application and the effect upon their property and the general area; and WHEREAS, the City Planner made a presentation to the Advisory Planning Commission outlining the applications; and NOW THEREFORE, upon motion by Member Voracek, seconded by Member Harrison, it was resolved that the Advisory Planning Commission be and it hereby is on record recommending to the City Council that the request for Comprehensive Guide amendment be denied for reasons, including the following: 1. The Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan (land use portion in place since 1974) provides for (R -II) Mixed Residential for the subject property, and it is not appropriate, based upon all information and testimony submitted, tc revise the Comprehensive Guide to increase the intensity for commercial uses. Although revisions to the Comprehensive Guide may be desirable and required occasionally for specific parcels; reliance on the Comprehensive Guide is important for governmental agencies, developers, residents and property owners. Any deviations or revisions must be well substantiated. /50 2 2. Development of traffic corridors, infrastructure, and County/City services have been planned contemplating (R -II) Residential for this site. The large scale proposed commercial use would require upgrading of such improvements and services, for example: entrance, exit and left turn lanes onto and off of I -35E. Disbursement of traffic into residential areas along Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Thomas Lake Road and Deerwood Drive would be increased substantially. 3. Property owners and residents in general have expressed orally and in writing, objections to the development for reasons including traffic and safety. 4. Residents and property owners have purchased surrounding properties based on the intended use of this site. It would be detrimental to the surrounding residents and property owners if this use were changed. 5. The Comprehensive Guide Plan adopted in 1975 and reaffirmed in 1980, with supporting statistics indicates there is a relatively high percentage of commercial property within the City at present, both in relation to potential development and to surrounding suburban communities. 6. The Comprehensive Guide Plan provides for residential uses surrounding the parcel with one small commercial site to the south. There are strong concerns by APC members and others whether the existing and proposed population can justify additional commercial property zoning. Those in favor: Hall, Harrison, McCrea, Trygg, Wilkins and Voracek. Those against: Gustafson. ATTEST By: E.J. VanOverbeke /e/ 3 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY 'OF EAGAN By: Secretary APC Minutes January 27, 1987 specific action be taken on the high value housing portion until the areas are more clearly specified and he recommended Estate zoning be designated for higher value housing. He also requested that the R & D use around the Country Home Heights Addition be stricken, according to earlier action of the Planning Commission and Council. Member McCrea suggested lessening the requirements to allow more higher value housing and Mr. Gustafson also favored not limiting the area where such housing would be permitted. City Attorney Paul Hauge submitted a proposed set of Findings and Conclusions and suggested a final draft of the Resolution be returned to the Planning Commission to incorporate the changes. At approximately 8:15 p.m., Member Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and revised map with two changes, including the deletion of the freeway development provision on page 13, and revising the R & D designation on the north and east sides of Country Home Heights, according to earlier Planning Commission and Council action, all according to a Resolution adopted by the Advisory Planning Commission, a copy of which is attached to these Minutes. All members voted yes. Harrison then moved, McCrea seconded the motion that the freeway development use concept be studied further by the staff and the Planning Commission with consideration at a later time, with the understanding that the freeway concept could be implemented along each of the freeway corridors within the City; further, that the study include a traffic analysis and also take into account existing comprehensive guide uses along the freeways. All commission members voted in favor. 35-E DIFFLEY CENTER - BIETER COMPANY APPLICATION PRELIMINARY PLAT, REZONING & COMP GUIDE REVISION At 8:15 p.m. Chairman Hall reconvened the continued public hearing regarding the application of the Bieter Company for rezoning 88.76 acres of A (Agricultural) land and 2.2 acres of RB (Roadside Business) land to RSC -PD (Regional Shopping Center -Planned Development); preliminary plat approval of the first phase of the major shopping complex; and comprehensive guide plan revision from R -II (Mixed Residential) and PF (Public Facilities) to RSC (Regional Shopping Center) use designation. Mr. Hall indicated the Planning Commission had considered the application at its November 25, 1986 regular meeting, at which time the Planning Commission requested further information from the staff. 11�v 4 APC Minutes January 27, 1987 Mr. Runkle briefly reviewed the traffic analysis and traffic study prepared at the City's request by Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, Inc. and the memorandum prepared by Public Works Director Tom Colbert marked Addendum 1 to the January 21, 1987 memo by Dale Runkle to the Advisory Planning Commission. In addition, a memo from the Eagan Fire and Police Departments, a memo regarding safety and fire issues and a memo from Finance Director Vanoverbeke regarding real estate tax and the impact of the development, were reviewed. A report prepared by Steven Schwanke of the City staff, dated January 22, 1987, providing a per -capita retail space study, was discussed and Mr. Runkle indicated it was not intended to be a market analysis but only a comparison, using statistics available to the City staff. Peter Jarvis, representing the applicant, requested 10 minutes introduction on behalf of the applicant, and 5 minutes after the public comment. Mr. Jarvis commented on the large amount of letters that had been received by the City from interested persons, developers and owners in the area. He briefly commented on the letter dated January 26, 1987 from Marvin Wolfenson of Northwest Tennis, indicating that Northwest would build at the 35-E Diffley Center and that it is the preeminent site for their purposes. A letter from Mr. Bergren of Super Valu Stores was also discussed and Mr. Runkle stated that he had been contacted by Mr. Bergren who noted that the 35-E Diffley site was the principal site being reviewed by Super Valu for a Cub Store in Eagan. A January 22, 1987 letter from Target Stores to the City indicated that I -35E and Diffley is the only site acceptable, which letter was signed by Edward J. Bierman. Mr. Jarvis introduced other representatives of the applicant who were present. An overflow audience was also present during deliberation, and a show of hands was requested both for and opposed to the project. Chairman Hall acknowledged a large group of letters had been submitted, both for and against the project, and then gave an opportunity to the general public to make comments. Louis Saukey of Meadowlark Court was opposed, as was Mike Stinson. Dave Frieberg favored the proposal. Colleen Hippler of Diffley Road was in opposition, whereas Susan Bjerke favored the project. Francis Franz who owns land to the north, stated that he had no objections to the proposal. Brad Swenson, a developer, was present and opposed the project on behalf of the developers of the commercial parcel at the southeast corner of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road. He introduced James E. McComb, a consultant from Minneapolis, who presented written information, and indicated the proposal may threaten the viability of the existing commercial centers, already designated in the City. Dan Funk appeared on behalf of the Board of the Woodgate Homeowners Association and was strongly opposed, for reasons including the following: 1. It would require a change in the Comprehensive Plan. APC Minutes January 27, 1987 2. It destroys the natural surrounding. 3. Other major shopping center areas that are already zoned are available for development. 4. The jobs proposed are all low-paying, part-time service jobs. 5. Substantial additional noise and traffic would result. Jim Burt favored the type of development taking place and recommended a responsible decision based upon all of the people's decision. Bill Laramy recommended a Walmart Store be considered for a commercial site in Eagan. Joseph Christenson, an attorney for the developer, and resident of Eagan, spoke in favor, and indicated it was his opinion that the Comprehensive Guide Plan suggests numerous commercial centers and favors disbursing them. David Mulden favored the project because of the additional tax base, whereas Mary Winchester stated there were very few persons in favor who live near the proposed site and was opposed because of all the additional commercial sites in the City. Vic Nelson, representing the Hilltop of Eagan Condominium Association appeared and was in opposition, as was Jim Haynes. Jerry Thomas, a former councilmember, appeared in opposition because it was his opinion that it would constitute spot zoning. Becky Goodwin expressed her opposition and was concerned about the traffic on the side roads leading to Diffley Road. Greg Johnson stated more traffic will be created on residential streets leading to other commercial sites, than on the proposed site. At 9:15, the chairman closed the public portion of the hearing. The Advisory Planning Commission members then made comments as follows: Member Gustafson stated that he had not weighed how many are for or against the project and evaluated the reasons made by those present. It was his conclusion that the decision was to do the project right, that we don't need additional commercial land, but that that has not been proven by a definitive study, and that other concerns were traffic, fire safety and the rolling hills. His concerns were that if three parcels are already designated for commercial, that that may be reasonable, but that there may be other sites that may be worse, on the basis of the above concerns, than is the I -35E Diffley site. Member Harrison's opinion was that the Comprehensive Plan designations are valid and that if a vote were given by the electorate, that the project would not succeed. City Attorney Paul Hauge recommended the Comprehensive Guide portion of the question be voted on first by the Planning Commission members, .and then the rezoning- application and the application for preliminary plat approval be voted on in that order. Peter Jarvis then had the following questions: 6 APC Minutes January 27, 1987 1. How to react to the staff reports. 2. How does the Advisory Planning Commission feel about the project. 3. Have conditions changed to warrant a reconsideration of the existing Comprehensive Guide Use designation. Other questions are whether it's good for the City, is it a strategic and convenient location. He argued that there would be no disruption to the immediate neighborhood, that it would be a major creator of jobs and that it is good planning. Other issues that he raised were as follows: 1. The interchange designation had been changed about 4 times and finally, a full diamond interchange had been designed. 2. I -35E was significantly realigned to move the alignment to the east. 3. Thomas Lake Road was relocated and moved west. 4. The present zoning is only a holding zoning. 5. There no longer is an RSC site in the City, and the former Dayton - Hudson site did not develop with retail because there were no anchors available. 6. The retail acreage has been a major issue but varies greatly statistically from city to city. 7. The change in the population growth is much greater than anticipated by the Metropolitan Council. 8. The changed conditions are logical and may be necessary. Mr. Jarvis also argued that the Hoffman project on Cliff Road is inconsistent with the present guide plan and the existing planned development and there is no access from Cliff Road, but only from side roads. Mr. Voracek stated that residents and tax payers are paying real estate taxes based upon the current Comprehensive Guide designations. At approximately 9:35 p.m. member Voracek moved to recommend that the request for Comprehensive Guide amendment from R -II to Regional Shopping Center Planned Development use be denied for reasons more specifically detailed in a Resolution, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of these minutes. Member Harrison seconded the motion. 7 APC Minutes January 27, 1987 Member Trygg stated the Comprehensive Guide Plan provides that it is a guide and that deviations should be well thought out. There is no demonstrated need for the change in use and no demonstrated showing that it could not be developed according to the current guide designation; further, that there is no indication that the proposed tenants could not locate in other commercial districts within the City. Member Voracek noted that he had no opposition to the proposed tenants locating in Eagan, but that he was looking toward the future of the entire City. All members voted in favor of the motion, except Gustafson who voted no. The consideration of the issue ended at 9:45 p.m. 16() Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen RESOLUTION/DIVISION OF PARCELS C. Resolution Authorizing Division of Two (2) Parcels Concerning Splashland Water Parks, Inc. --The City has initiated an application to divide certain parcels owned by Splashland Water Parks, Inc., L_ allow for the respreading of special assessments against the new parcels. The Director of Finance has coordinated this issue and enclosed on pages /6Z, through is a memo and corresponding information regarding the suggested division of certain parcels as defined in Exhibit A. Also enclosed on page1Z is a copy of the resolu- tion to be considered by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a resolu- tion authorizing the division of certain real property within the City and directing the Finance Director/City Clerk to file this resolution with the Dakota County Audi'Lor. /6/ MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: JANUARY 26, 1987 SUBJECT: SPLASHLAND PROPERTY SPLIT Please find attached a request and supporting documentation to split two parcels within the City. As you may recall, this request has been necessitated by the failure of the Splashland final plat to be recorded and by the sale of portions of both parcels. City Planner Runkle has determined that no formal planning commission review is necessary at this time since it was reviewed as a part of the preliminary platting process and since the parcels are physically split by highway/street right-of-way. I am satisfied that the appropriate authorization to respread the special assessments is included and can be complied with. I am, therefore, requesting that this matter be placed on the City Council agenda for consideration at the February 3, 1987, meeting. The action would be to adopt the attached resolution. Please note that any development covering one or more of the parcels designated as 1, 2, or 3 on Exhibit A would require additional formal action by the City Council with either a formal plat or a waiver of platting. The City also should be reluctant to further split current parcel #10-01900-015-50 without a detailed agreement to avoid an obvious tax forfeit possibility. Let me know if you would like any additional information and also whether or not you want a representative of Splashland to be at the meeting. Finan Director/City Clerk cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner EJV/kf /� FREDRIKSON & BYRON EARL P. DIESSNER JAMBS R. HALLER A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION JOHN M. EONBCK CIIN7ON E. CUTLER JOHN P. BYRON ROBERT H. TALK ROBERT 1. BURNS, JR. RANDY B. EVANS BBR71N A. 615888, JR. LBO G. STERN PAUL L. LANDRY SHIVA J. SANDERS JOHN M. E.RTFINCH 1100 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE TIED S. S MI UKLZ HARBI�N MAN G�AYLS P.HRNDDLXY-ZAPPIA R HAN RICHARD R. HAN58N ON THOMAS W THOMAS W. GARTON DORSO WEST 900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH A. BRTINON PATRICMICHAEL PATROBERT H. RO SET G WEBER ROBERT G. WEBER JOHN A. SATORIUS A. A. TR17TiP0 ROBERT C. ROISYERT, JA. OISVERN ROBERT P. SANDS MICHAEL A. STERN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-3397 LINDAC. SCHWAB n C. SUWN C. ROOT KEITH A. LIBBEY NEI. A. WRIKART JAMES B. PLATT JAMES SANDRAYAEGER BODRAU RAYMOND M. 1I.R. WILLIAM J. BRODY TELEX 290569 FREDRIKSON MPS DAVID P. BUNDS MARY B. STRAND ALLEN I. oL50N JOHN H. MERIIETELECOPIER 612 347-7077 RAYMOND C. LALLIBR LYNN M. GARDIN KEVIN D. McCARY THOMAS R. KING oHN x. STOUT THOMAS S. FRASER A. cBIMSTAD TELEPHONE (612) 347-7000 ORIGORY P. KAIHOI SHARON K. FREIBR MALLORY K. MULLINS JOL. SAILLIe �oxH RIC S. ANDERSON XRIS 1N ARNESON JOHN P. WURM WILLIAM 1. KAMPF I DAVID R. BUSCH ROBERT K. RANUM BRIAN G. FORMEI I R. BERTA GREENER DAVID C. GRORUD WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL HAL B. MORGAN SUSAN J. HARDMANCONKLIN WARREN E. MACK KONRAD J. FRIEDEMANN THOMAS B. HOPPMAN NANCY I. ONKRA JOHN L. POWERS LARRY J. BERG MARY S. H BRADA P. BAYER CHARLES P. jOHN J. HRHAAT L. ZR ELIZABETH L. ZeRBY BRADLEY P. L. SYVRRSON %:NBR QUENTIN T. JOHNSON JOHN G. KOST LARRY D. HAUSR STEVEN N. BECK TIMOTHY M. HEANEY KATHLEEN A. HUGHES H. BRUCH — OHLRN ANN M. LADD 347-7124 WILLS J. WRIGHT 11912-19851 OF COUNSEL HAROLD M. FREDRINSON EARL P. COLBORN, JR. January 14, 1987 E. J. Van Overbeke, C.P.A. City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Splashland Waterparks, Inc. Ladies and Gentlemen: Splashland Waterparks, Inc. ("Splashland") requests a resolution from the City Council of the City of Eagan regarding creation of new tax parcels by the splitting of existing tax parcels located in the City of Eagan. For ease of discussion, a diagram of the real property discussed herein is attached as Exhibit A. The shading and numerical designations are for reference only. Splashland acquired title to the property designated as Parcel 1 on Exhibit A and legally described on Exhibit lA by a warranty deed executed by Roger and Darlene Slater, dated June 19, 1985. A copy of the warranty deed is attached as Exhibit B. There is an outstanding purchase money mortgage with respect.to Parcel 1, executed by Splashland Waterparks, Inc. as mortgagor and the Slaters and Robert and Rita Winkler, as mortgagees. Splashland acquired title to the real property designated as Parcel 2 on Exhibit A and legally described on Exhibit 1B by a warranty deed executed by Metram Properties Company, dated December 18, 1986. A copy of the warranty deed is attached as Exhibit C. Splashland acquired title to the real property designated as Parcel 3 on Exhibit A and legally described on Exhibit 1C by a warranty deed executed by M.H.E. Eagan Town Investment Property Enterprises No. 2, signed July 2, 1985. A /6-3 FREDRIKSON & BYRON A PROFESSIONAL ASS=A71ON E. J. Van Overbeke, C.P.A. Page 2 January 14, 1987 copy of the warranty deed is attached as Exhibit D. There is an outstanding Mortgage, Security Agreement and Financing Statement with respect to Parcel 3 between Splashland, as mortgagor, and M.H.E. Eagan Town Investment Property Enter- prises No. 2, as mortgagee. Parcel 2 and certain other real property owned by Metram Properties, Inc. and designated as "Metram" on Exhibit A are covered by one tax parcel identification number. Because legal ownership of Parcel 2 has passed to Splashland, and by an agreement between Metram Properties, Inc. and Splashland, (see attached Exhibit E) Splashland has agreed to assume respons- ibility for all levied and outstanding special assessments against tax parcel No. 10-01900-011-54. As to pending and future assessments, Splashland hereby requests that the City of Eagan hereby adopt a resolution creating a new tax parcel consisting entirely of Parcel 2, separate from the remainder of tax parcel No. 10-01900-011-54. Pending and future special assessments against Parcel 2 would be assessed separately and independently from those assessed against the "Metram" property, which would continue to be designated as tax parcel No. 10-01900-011-54. Splashland agrees to accept all responsibility for all levied assessments assessed against Parcel 2. Parcel 1 and certain other real property owned by the Slaters and designated as "Slater" on Exhibit A are covered by one tax identification number. Because Parcel 1 has been transferred to Splashland, and by an agreement between Splashland and the Slaters, attached as Exhibit F, the parties have agreed to and hereby request the City of Eagan to create a new, separate tax parcel consisting entirely of Parcel YA All levied and outstanding assessments assessed against tax parcel No. 10-01900-015-50 should be reassessed between ParcellY and tax parcel No. 10-01900-015-50 as separate tax parcels, based on the criterion currently employed by the City of Eagan for' assessments. All pending and future special assessments should be assessed on Parcel 1 and the "Slater" parcel separately and 4�J independently, and Splashland agrees to accept full respon- 1 sibility for the special assessments assessed against Parcel 3. All of the real property designated as Parcel 3 is currently owned by Splashland, and Splashland requires no further action by the City of Eagan in regards to its tax identification number or assessments thereon. F G FREDRIKSON & BYRON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION E. J. Van Overbeke, C.P.A. Page 3 January 14, 1987 If there is any further information which the City of Eagan feels would be helpful in its deliberations on this matter, please contact Ann Marie Ladd, Attorney for Splashland Waterparks, Inc., at the address designated below. The City's cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Thomas Webster, President Splashland Waterparks, Inc. 1500 East 79th Street Bloomington, MN 55420 Ann Marie Ladd Attorney for Splashland Waterparks, Inc. Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. 1100 International Centre 900 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 347-7124 X-5 a I�O ••IrrM " s � Z -16 • 'gee •a=°�; -- 6 = + • rO•i� • ''' •� a1� ''� µgr '.F rn �(j\1 jIb I". :X, •tr • �. / / ` ~ ►aAC[L LISpf .[Ir r a i './••�.r:r�}.• i � ±g\� u.[ ILCn "+!1• �•.. �;.r. N. /ti I 7p•.ti~✓Z,:'°!. `. tan, y I \•• ,1.11, 1., iq W. A. Ul �; � �I C �L 1Yw m1, H ` � � =.'�4 Vii• . t Z �.� a '' ,f- b 8 it ,� 1\\ rte. 0 •'I 1 r 7 1 .1 ti NONI -it. N.T W Cyt• :� � ;. - L— 1 (pY [aaI [ •may J i ff � a - rye 'Y .i S G`•h('Gi(� • C ! • � 1 � �� .... _ •'s t'�.�—` � �" �1•a Tana f} � 'h"+��� t•���5^'' L ' \\\\\\ ti i '�af+r tax;7._.._ N n $ Y 1pIN jl 4 22 . IN aa ,. ib'•, 0 L r.,•1r a ;• S. • _ , Y ; '+• IN w . - $ - y r a1ao0 1tY a i .0 ` . 4 X 'G. J,., n A 1 $7 uao•we•IrW . ''� .. •S _L•• 'f=.�.� ... " !, w i 'a rpt ^ No Rew .r` -1u.1.a. a.[a a•urarl •, - •aa r ,+ `. at Ow eve-if •{Q r+ 'j I-1M It 1t•H >t —._ -"taw' u,•.: fit S " aE__a C.S.a.. 2! �° � J • •, CEDAR vEtiu_ � Ila••• Ig0rM-a0Y 111 1/a l.N[ \�j./,] 1 1 V � n CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION Authorizing the Division of Certain Real Property Within the City and Directing the Finance Director/City Clerk to File this Resolution With the Dakota County Auditor WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has adopted regulations governing the subdivision of land within its boundaries; and WHEREAS, Splashland Waterparks, Inc., has requested that parcels 10-01900-015-05 and 10-01900-011-54 be divided to allow the transfer of title to be recorded; and WHEREAS, these parcels are physically divided by street and highway right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the dividing of these two parcels is not detrimental to property development or special assessment levy collection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of'Eagan authorizes the division of this real property per Exhibit A and directs the notification of the Dakota County Auditor. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: MEMBERS IN FAVOR: MEMBERS OPPOSED: Date: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN Mayor City Clerk CERTIFICATION I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a RESOLUTION adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, on , 19 E. J. _ VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen SPECIAL PERMIT/SIGN FOR EAGAN CONVENIENCE CENTER D. Special Permit to Allow a Second, Building -Mounted Sign Totaling 110 Square Feet at the Eagan Convenience Center --The owners of the Eagan Convenience Center are requesting a special permit to allow a second, building -mounted sign totaling 110 Square feet on the west side of the Eagan Convenience Center. The sign would be read by motorist on Crestwood Lane and viewed at the intersection of Duckwood and Crestwood Lane. For additional information on this request, refer to the Planning Department report found on page/L49, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special permit to allow a second, building -mounted sign at the Eagan Convenience Center as presented. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: ALI HAGHIGHI LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, EAGAN CONVENIENCE CENTER EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 5, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 29, 1987 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been received by the City requesting a Special Permit to". allow a 2' x 55' .(110 S.F. ) building mounted sign on the eastern side of the Eagan Convenience Center located at the southeast intersection of Duckwood Drive and Krestwood Lane. Staff previously approved a V-10" x 25'-6" (approximately 100 S.F.)'sign on the front of the building - consistent with the others on that side. Since this building contains more than one tenant, has individual signs on the front and a pylon sign - the subject sign was not approved. Code states that: "No more than one Business Sign for each major street frontage shall be permitted on a building for each -business located within such building. Staff has three concerns.- 1. oncerns:1. Should Krestwood Lane be considered a major street. ,2. The building is not owned by the applicant and cannot be judged the same as say a fast food facility with four-sided building mounted signs. =3. No other tenants were permitted more than one business sign. . h. Y Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen WAIVER OF PLAT/DUPLEX LOT E. Waiver of Plat in Order to Split a Duplex Lot for Owner - Occupancy on Lot 10, Block 2, Cedar Cliff 3rd Addition Along Scott Trail --An application was presented to the City by Jerome and June Thompson who reside at 4551 and 4553 Scott Trail, request- ing a duplex lot split to allow separate ownership. This type of lot split does require City Council action; however, due to the typical formality of the lot split request for private ownership, there was no staff report prepared. Enclosed on page is a copy of the surveyor's certificate that identifies the parcel which is Lot 10, Block 2, Cedar Cliff 3rd Addition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a duplex lot split for Lot 10, Block 2, Cedar Cliff 3rd Addition to allow for private ownership of both units A and B. /710 f � i CALVIN H. HEDLUND Land Surveyor Civil Engineer 9609 Girard Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 Phone, 888-2080 Surveyors certificateXyKAVF ae NO 156 SURVEY FOR: Zachman Homes DESCRIBED AS: Lot 10, Block 2, CEDAR CLIFF 3RD ADDITION, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, and reserving easements of record. g0S.6 I � I I I I I I I + _ 40.00 I r I I I I I �I I �I o1.7 I ol•"1 110 ,•r- — 24 0'/z 24-0%z" 'N UN IT 6 NIT \N I 10 �O S'ha kc s i °� �' I `T/I.i. GAQ / GAR ol- 1.1 O 1 I DRIVE I pRIVE I 9o0.a RO Qo 3.6 Basement Floor -- 902.0 Garage Floor-- 901.4 Proposed Elevations 0 Exisfin9 Elevations Denotes Or naSe. —� Denotes Lot Corner O /1 L.� lo'(S Make.. s99. a c� 9oo.s SC TT 11SA) L 899.5 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY goo.is 8`19.85 I hereby certify that on I2-3) - $o I surveyed the property described above and that the above plat is a correct representation of sold survey. 1 Calvin H. Hedlund, Minn. Rey. No. 5942 Id Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen WAIVER OF PLAT/NORTHWESTERN BELL F. Waiver of Plat, Northwestern Bell, to Combine a 401X50' Parcel With the Existing Utility Building Located Along Lexington Avenue --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on January 27, 1987, to consider an application submitted by Northwestern Bell requesting a waiver of plat to combine a 40'X50' parcel to the existing utility building site along Lexington Avenue, north of Diffley Road. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineerin Department report; a copy is enclosed on pages f hrough. For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, rifer to page(s) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for Northwestern Bell to allow a 401X50' parcel to be combined with the existing building site located along Lexington Avenue. /,V } `}r u.� tr*n d. ,^ 4 `^+.74- s SE 4Nc:.` t, 4�.-t 1a-ri�rra ^S'„ ?Al �+ .a'ist'x`-.? v3�' # •�. S•ax�:' d+'?n't�f;°, a� rr.# >r s,T,;'4'�rJe�F±+#` ..; -. -'�° -r '�'s fin, '$ �"� ��' e � c.`Yw ''ae4u� 9 .;•i R w "d' meq; x . ;y b ,p+•Aa i u.. i?± A a i41 R. N A4 +ry:+i,-n v �, ,, .f�R , fi��`� � ?�„s .+ � ",, ,� ., � �4 ±� yf n� �n,a 4 „4 ,:� •ei, � ,tet¢, `' o��,�,*�,�;ta �y, .f ��* "�V - .t �r 1 'ks' �Wl �lS F i a '�•'tbs{+i Ka;�+` f:fs q .l,r u4 i a fir 1a? :Z -i ea"3x.•s.: --r tW 14 }< : 2v - - .' fir, +.= " , ':�,t',•,. e� 5 a4 'k.3£ d i°1.4'F '�'r°�' ° �a, ':'r .s .elf".�'�T� t- ,rR ''«fs' �r4".r�"t�.F•� � J'�, '.:�, 'rylsf' sry' #'���'-�'�m.'�y'4'`�.,��Ya ..irk" �'� � nc�4� CITY OF EAGAN 3 >. ri'tra,.G rr,M r 4 a � �r • y- ,+. 4 , ^ 1 fys'�{ :� k r:'�`<� �` 'S r ��y� f sF,1 k� � i•°, �y_+"�x� "Y{-y't�,�, s•,r._.; ea �,L s i a i 'r"a`Z `,. .",,,•,Cu' `•'i :�'•slk' •'if.. -* _ Pr ,3yE,'As. ;m•+� r x.:•7�s5r t< -A �''Yi' w� 3"n'i't' `" Rrs`' .y>•, Y :. y�>y,t +5.-...;A•,1�' n ,. ;+:.. `y,. . s ;..�,j^t �, qa--? S .fie ..; ss'r{y£ '^S�ai` 4��"{':'" ak d� . p+��b•�'yq, e e"z .c u�f {• e Chi ,- s. is rt" `, •+• .. ''r'. ,r''-.. " kk"" k Akp ry".7•a'*Y -,S' il. r.. 15s t My r>' �*•v t °T� t r se' ,.. 3 Zx , ;,� r .,yF -. sz, SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT �� ;� Z s, x �i si rm � t; L� a 47 gtVy Y,�s�ry ;e q !1 F i r f ' x -:. , ..y '. •. ::: - ', c:, !. r F y -. -tr''„3nA Y -'L )�iA i "rF '. i ��, AAr a. ; ?.�. ,i w 3, t ... y t +� -' :nf _ i'T.7r s° i. n t v x 3 '+ �•`' a "Nyr'rzi.y¢1 APPLICANT NORTHWESTERN BELL£ ( * 13Y}�' r e r�'i' � v 7. r s,.; .. . -.:, �#, :�i e-, �+ _ .,,?5. r ., s �.; �� T-n<•F ri,. � s�' tiez � � � �� � � •�y� ��;. ;'6 F LOCATION SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23 Nr tri r ;r r.�'t�et.t�.cYfi ev�tkd 0"' 4 a-.` a <',g•t; "'" :c, i �� `., 4 a .,,;r...,r ;i:, '.._ .. ; "'ia'^•£ ..t ... `.., <, ...f ., ••; �'i`. } n•r a, t� ie EXISTING ZONING R-4# WITHIN THE LEXINGTON SOUTH P.D.�� F yrz.t i",1S'i rt ti'i4 :ti'r-',y_J{'' : •. a -'.i,. -% � :- -�`:.- + � ` ,$-r a'f t y.�. 'k a ✓ e ���y�4i�3� s DATE OF PUBLIC SHEARING: JANUARY+ 27, 1987 �t . 'r lS Y Y .; ... _ _:.. • „ ..'i- t JANUARY 20, g j • R , re�s y :r i a f -Sr.t afi a' DATE OF RE JANUARY �1987 -IN �wi'•ri .�a ��` REPORTED BY. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS rg� ad _�{��1 vj x-::'� "[.x _t S �, w -' - :vp• :rik s xa} i.,4v"'T'i�aw S3 u � n'• V�' i � +., rt .: �' ?i �At t�' s. r .r. Y �t,ry i t }�--5�`,.1� .� n�- kSF•;a4.tF + '} ,'e;+a ` "-r,#r '"t :•r rx `':-fir 7th cX f'i $ Y 7, -'' 1 4 •:-... 'l Y " s ;kxt .,yr"' iF �,i_, k .':,�Yitr4' �#+y 'Y,"; APPLICATION. An application has been submitted by Northwestern Be requesting a waiver of plat to combine a 40' X 50' parcel to the 'existingutility building site along Lexington Avenue Y 9 9 9 ,' just north of " Diff ley Road. A second 171, X 22' building, very similar to the"' existing one, will be built on this area. °{ a��r,f✓.y•a Earlier this month, a variance was'requested in order'to allow this 2nd .building to be 5' from the existing property 'line with the —understanding that the waiver of plat process would be initiated in. February. The Council referred this item to the January 27 APC Aq meeting and did not act on the variance request. x•'1* new parcel will measure.approximatelyi 50' X 150' and all setbacks meet code requirements. -Northwestern Bell also wishes to -remove the access drive to Lexington Avenue with the completion letion of P this project if an agreement for a single, shared access with the CitY s Water Pobtained. Department can be �; �..r •�.;;�,�� _ '� ,,�' °�•�� dx�r �d� ��?�w �' as�'•f�t i� ����ay'�<<v�,•y �yp4�;a"�., iiRSXi ' f•.��+p{= x na• t f" 3fk� If approved, this waiver of plat shall be subject to }i>�'fy#: +��. �•�tti"x,,"�--_,,. ti+r`s•S� .. � t. , s. 2 ! : �, i'a ..� ' ,3 .� .>rt *+'�.. +�s � <ra ms's ""� r„ lar � � y�' ! -L ,r: '4 ,.a i� -'1 f,.F.' K3 ..¢, A' .s i•E} '1Y ik .'ii A'.terr`'<t.q p�7' L+f=�,qq K' 'ia'.r,m' ts� 'i. �.,;% t+•�rtT'•,1�°�, A parks dedication fee.. ,�>Y5 `� s t' .�rYiy, f� f .•_v k:#' rs.h} .£ t, .,. f x Errs S't s :(. j y54 4, 4 yy ds �z'%."t, 'Ar„Co °v+sr:'�r .. s.'s' k µ. {✓",' r-F(:1�'rxr`^f �;t'- % } Fm •r,iy k. {�gv'J�3.a �S' Yg,a'/����}•,r T,',t - '•x1; a. .x �./ •i"4y 2. p Additional appropriate landscape material. �rig��itif"¢4, ak' 7f ` 43 a�� t•5{ i ..' : s'..t � d .'� ! 4 ` s� -t. .L+t �C."': g �,+'�ah � .. £�° �..t.. �,�.y }.h Thi.: a"yr `}'y"T'C,S J � ':.. ,- • ' F 7'k' • : .S: 4"%1 .•"•4..,? •:..vx FY'.ri'."� � � ,. 9 ��{.SA,�i.' �-.J�F S '. TdC �Y M. �4� � L hJS� �h`t N.� �-�'�3'. uirementsk>?`k"'� 3 re � ; • ¢,,?',."k �" r+_ ' �,f�` �`'..t��t �ri t� �'�4.* 'r�..,p,?4 "k$ } rA„'`?`'`�s & W,'�mA" f x , ! . v u'^ i _ ; 4 r � y! ..., A r 'li x 3. �"_ r Ep i rez� � �S, •[ �`rf K''i x, �Y r `�3: rpt �� ` , y{ Or - .}. j,��•rj %t'�-�` � v�, +n`�� e � F u•, �'•+,;<r. .;4 rn. � � � A i . r R #X a� �y� 7g•.+; s t _ 3':' y .- �. rvr'-sv.`t e:� .;r.> �� �, f � v j �. e e s tv sr�' P' : f ° �f`v r4 �cra�•� �� �;' :.�.,rfl+r_. Ss`� r •a' -..,s *.*: N:s+:", $..:..`:+, iY �F �• 1�::. 'r:+>.• :• .:,c .�• �.'4Se•Zi, .7?T%'r?'.'., x..Ss -r. �. - .'`y.,, a..c• •� . z �.�' ?r .w s.�:ia�. fi-.:-x9S�4''�'Fs,��is,�.:n �v✓:.� ' � _� r^ ,.. �-.. P ty. „ - >r gti'r'trW* �` ^�e3yss?µ y a• _ a.- -vrt �'r;rc ra.. i.MrT r .. ax.' Sr. --7F,.t<6=x. • !r , a: �, �_, �y C..e E�� L�( A� �jA N� `` F„� "' � ` s'`, '"`a #�, +r� •� Ar•'. ic• "�'•'r . ;Wyv } '`,.y r`' Cz 4°-v yrs° IN �1r1�.i�� ��t+l�:c2,'c'�54.+-', - ��'*A;,';�.a�;���'�"�.+2; s; ,rt�ss''a',.-:xr a.�.t:;vA�...s�"..'.rz>'.�,.��.•:s•' =int �.: �,t's�,+���.�z+�n".s.r. +•w''� „� �"1 d> el r CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: N.W. B91L THE ■f. C01l.,Rls.l.r. ANDPOWT OFCD"IATRCE"ERT OFOESCRNKD LRIE'aa1C- , ,to o w L"941.07 :- R=1125.65 a=47.5402" i Sg8.065q. SCALE,1"R2d F POINT OF BCCIMMIMB Of DESCRIBED LI"E a 88 82 20 0 20 40 RR101 • Denotes found I.P. ° Denotes sat I.P. T38 } Denotes found P.E. nail EXISTING am"Noos WIVE OSLO 84 0 Be -O DESCRIBED LIN[ 'a' S89'52'25" 300.00. N D o Zo a d a: n Z ' ...: Jr = b .. BOOSTER V ^ -^ BWLDN"G Q Z Q u Bu « 4 _.SUR.MA tl1IGdM[.fJ mi, f�711L Meana ............. r ..rte. ,. • : a 1 q.;'RANG , �1 OR"ER B. � . a.Bi f I ND _,_—KSCRDED LINE'C' �M.IV lr i S890 52'2-5 171.31 - 82.6 - 100 - lr-- 80.00 IN a U . 5131 oa V 1 PROPOSED i 16` KB GIISTwe au 'rD Z 1 SITMINOOS 1 I DIIIVL 1 BITIBIIMOO! DRIVE •. co in 6 t ---------�IlB — —� eao nB a. �try=d Y B z c � PROPOSED [T L f= OpN ► 01 "BUR.p Hr7Kll ° 1 S Q 0 MD Budame et.a u is o N r L ° 0 B7 "4.0 tl aJ E In © IalurR y ' ' . i -- 40.00 6.3 •' •. ITOp'. 90.13 S[.9 azi A-2-29'14" - `50-77 'L -- S89°52'25"E 180.90 ,LR44.174 '••%-R'1017.38 -- Oti '�+ N J"'* N CDII.,Br.ih,tr. EI.... _ K.s S89'SZ 25 E at.4OKiatori'roouwTRr T95A1 .300.00' BE asK BDYT" LINE W TK rl/B, B,r.W,KCsl.7.lT, R.B! 17 t Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT/CHAPEL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH G. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from R-2 to Public Facil- ities, Preliminary Plat, Requested by Chapel Hill Baptist Church for a Church on Approximately 9 Acres and Rezoning from A to PF --The public hearing was first held on December 18 to consider an application submitted by the Chapel Hill Baptist Church for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for a Baptist Church on 9.4 Acres Abutting Pilot Knob Road on the west with Lebanon Hills Regional Park on the south. This item was continued until the January 27, 1987, meeting. The APC is recom- mending approval of the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, rezon- ing and preliminary plat. For a copy of the Planning and Engineering report, refer to pages — through For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page ( s 71ki1d ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from R-2 to Public Facilities, 2) rezoning from A to PF, and 3) preliminary plat approval for Chapel Hill Addition. �v 4,1, Oh g4i �v Y'll X, 4 n v, WA sg WOK "A3 Jr N, MU 9 Ir A, jq CITY OF EAGAN 4" h 4,4 -v 'rn"WA, Ap 6 W -e; 7 col 1, Z, . 4, q io , — '. I ;J� SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT & COMPREHENSIVE TIO GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT (CHAPEL HILL ADDI LICANTaa!': CHAPEL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH ".."y NW 41 SECTION ECTION 34 LO i Cw, W 'nAp._ " q! Wo , _:� : , V 'j", . , EXISTING ZONING. -''A (AGRICULTURAL) j, A j _J DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 18t 1986- C -N A. G A DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBER 11,1986 4", R EPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING -z VV -Two separate applications ha[v e been submitted to the APPLICATION: ;City requesting a Rezoning from A (agricultural) to PF (public C facilities) for the Chapel Hill Addition.' This plat consists of one lot for a Baptist church on 9.4 acres, abutting Pilot Knob Road on -A: `the west with Lebanon Hills 'Regional Park on the south. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will be ..required for this J, �Rezoning since the current -land use designation -is R-11.,. W 'ZONING -LAND USE: site "is surrounded by two agricultural"'; Jr. parcels served from a single drive on the north, a small agricultural parcel and park on the south, and a park to the east Across Pilot Knob Road to the west is agricultural land containin pp_ athe Diamond T Ranch. OX"'This site would have been served by utilities extending soyuth from7, "*',,;4V,'the Fairway Hills Additions. .,.Due to the revocation of the '1st Addition Final Plat and the uncertainty of the 2nd Addition, the 4 ',applicants are requesting a Variance to allow temporary well and septic tank systems. The City Inspections Department -would require , W;�t "that the septic system conform to all regulations within the MPCA Manual WPC 40.'. This document provides guidelines for all on site-., -sewage. disposal systems. The City will also require an on site i nspection of this system if. approved. 7 The topography falls to the South towards a marshy pond area' -wit -the park. .,Vegetation is mostly grassy with Oaks dominating the hardwood tree areas. The proposed landscaping should incorpora -,native species with those in the adjacent park. to, provide a more .-.'natural re-establishment of -the- disturbed areas. -A preliminary."'Zil -landscape plant material.. list was provided but a more detailed ray planting 1 g plan listing sizes, quantities and species will be'- e 1,,required prior to the Final Plat submission. cThis plan shall berz by a landscape architect familiar with plant material native M CHAPEL HILLS ADDITION DECEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE TWO SITE PLAN: Access to this 9 acre parcel will be from a 60' easement along the northern portion of this site connecting to Pilot Knob Road. This easement also serves both parcels to the north, one of which contains a single-family home. The church itself is proposed to be built in four phases as the congregation grows. Parking lot expansion will be required with each phase. The main hexagonal sanctuary is proposed with the final phase of construction and will seat 1300 people. Code requires one parking stall per 3.5 seats or 371 total stalls. Area for 404 has been designated on the long- range site plan. Since the 60' entry easement will someday become public, now there will be a 20' parking setback along that area as well as along Pilot Knob Road. Other parking setbacks shown at 20' were done to lessen the impact on the different adjacent land uses. All building setbacks are a minimum of 40' from the property lines. The first phase of construction will have a 480 -seat facility and require 137 10' stalls. Detailed building elevations have not been provided for staff review at this time. GRADING/DRAINAGE: This proposed development is located on the southern exposure of a hill that has a 60' drop from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. All present surface water drainage is directed to the south into the Dakota County Lebanon Hills Regional Park. There is presently no storm sewer .facilities immediately available to handle the additional runoff generated from this proposed development.. Due to the fact that all runoff will be directed into County Road 31 (Pilot Knob Road) right-of-way or Dakota County Park property, it will be necessary to obtain the County's requirements before any approval or additional review can be performed by the City. It is recommended that all internal storm sewer facilities to handle both the present and proposed future parking lot facilities be installed to the property line of this development for future connection and extension with the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. This upgrading is presently scheduled for 1990. Due to the extreme slopes of this property, extensive erosion control measures will have to be installed and maintained until permanent vegetation restoration has been completed. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water of sufficient size, capacity and depth are presently not available to service this proposed development. Sanitary sewer and water main was originally intended to be installed to a point approximately 300' north under the Fairway Hills development which has subsequently died. Even with the installation of sanitary sewer through the previous Fairway Hills proposal, it would be necessary for this facility to install an internal private sanitary lift station/ejector pump due to the building's proposed location on the lower slopes of this parcel. /1% CHAPEL HILLS ADDITION DECEMBER 18,1986 PAGE THREE The developer has submitted a letter requesting a variance to the City's requirement of sanitary sewer and water availability. They are requesting permission to construct an on-site well and septic system to handle their facility until such time that City utilities are made available to this site. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: This development proposes to dedicate a 60' public street at the northwest corner of their plat to provide access not only to this development, but to the two unplatted parcels to the north. This major access onto County Road 31 (Pilot Knob Road) must be approved by the Dakota County Highway Department. Itis recommended that this proposed street be dedicated as a public right -of-way and appropriately named to ensure public access to all parcels. However, until such time that it is extended and provides service to the adjacent parcels, it should be the maintenance responsibility of -this church due to its use only as a private access for their parking lot. The internal parking lot configuration and circulation pattern shall be designed in accordance with engineering standards, policies and codes. This development shall be responsible for the installation of an 8' bituminous trail along Pilot Knob Road. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Because this plat abuts existing County Road 31 (Pilot Knob Road), it shall be subject to the conditions of the Dakota County Plat Commission and Highway Department. 'This includes the requirement of dedicating sufficient additional right-of-way to accommodate the proposed future upgrading of Pilot Knob Road and the -location of the proposed public access street. The discharge of surface water runoff into County right-of- way or County parks shall require the appropriate permit acquisition from the affected agency. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition or dedication of appropriate permanent and temporary construction easements necessary to provide sanitary sewer and water main to this site if the requested variance for connection to public utilities is granted. This developer shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits (MPGA, MWCC, Department of Health, County, etc.) are acquired prior to final plat approval or building permit issuance, whichever is required by the.affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: No trunk area utility or road improvment assessments have been levied against this property allowing for its proposed development. Subsequently, the following assessment obligations will be the responsibility of this development as a condition of final plat approval: 17f CHAPEL HILLS ADDITION DECEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE FOUR ITEM 1987 RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Trunk Area Water $1,250/ac. 8.4 ac. $10,500 Trunk Area Sanitary Sewer $1,300/ac. 8.4 ac. $10,920 Trunk Area Storm Sewer $0.079/s.f. 8.4 ac. $28,906 Pilot Knob Road Upgrading $35.44/f.f. 302.70 ft. $10,728 Pilot Knob Road Trail $12.40/f.f. 302.70 ft. $ 3,753 TOTAL................................. $64,807 These amounts will be adjusted based on the final area and frontage calculations based on the recorded plat and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval or public improvment project award, whichever occurs first. IR CHAPEL HILLS ADDITION DECEMBER 18, 1986 PAGE FIVE CONDITIONS: CHAPEL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH 1. All standard platting Conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The Parks Dedication shall be deferred until the use changes from a public facility use. 3. The septic tank system shall be designed in accordance with the MPGA Manual WPC 40. An on site inspection will be performed by City Staff to ensure proper installation. 4. All parking stalls shall be 10' in width with double loadfad parking area aisles 24' in width. 5. All signage above 7' shall require a Conditional Use Permit. 6. A landscape plan shall be required for the overall design. The plan shall be drawn by a landscape architect familiar with native species and place special emphasis on screening the residential area to the north. A financial guarantee shall be submitted and not released until after one year from the installation date. 7. Each additional parking lot expansion will be reviewed by City Staff and the landscaping will be required with that expansion. 8. Parking for 137 will be required with the first phase. 9. This development shall be subject to the conditions and requirements of the Dakota County Plat Commission. 10. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all required regulatory agency permits in accordance with their stipulated time frames. 11. This development shall install a1:1 internal storm sewer facilities necessary to handle the first and ultimate phased development.of packing lot and building facilities. 12. Sanitary sewer and water main shall be ordered for installation by Council action to this development, or a variance for an onsite well and septic system shall be approved prior to final plat approval. 13. This development shall be responsible for the dedication or acquisition of all required road and utility easements as required by the County or City. 14. The proposed access street shall be constructed to City standards but maintained totally by this development until further extension for service or use by other properties. 15. This development shall be responsible for all trunk area utility and future County Road improvements in accordance with LOCATION ZONING ( - E ' _ - -- -7: --- R -I I R-11 'p ' R -I F R- R -1 R-1 P' 1 GOLF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - R -I R -II E I.SOEZ---H MASTER SITE PLAN C3-io?Ei- Hl�.i: F�+PTI ST o so m too / �Rl3ifi EG t"/ PLHV JC)Z J. t7►Twwuc niT riE�L t:/v/ea 'X 363.00 N N°SU' 25"W - >i PROPOSED STREET =Ngg°y325•yy 58T°43'�otir_ _ 436.39 • '. Z I L 0 ., T 1 z 3Y I :• BLOC KrL - �'S`• iii *- • EnSEMENT L 1'L 389°58'25"E • Mri" UNE W N. M2.70 R. Or W W OF SW IA E I.SOEZ---H MASTER SITE PLAN C3-io?Ei- Hl�.i: F�+PTI ST o so m too / �Rl3ifi EG t"/ PLHV JC)Z J. t7►Twwuc niT riE�L t:/v/ea 9 Ii p\0 0� _.__baa Katyn lo�i� 99 .M.9m mow vmxin 7W IN yon m ftwm an M... 131 1 H ) naH01iv*4 >icad-wa r . ■ 48^vu. 8- _j L�:.�suvurua I ow.v p P=3P. 2-870.6p 3Bo 36 �p1 N�89.4 %j7PATCHj ' ?�.,N 872.4 865x2 1 ��i 9 _... - 8-c , JP- 8'-� Il �r a JP -8 PATRICK a JP�7 y l/ B72i 874.0 12" 630. EAGAN o �J BP 4 ♦ &75�C�1 8r9.9�,Tj J �)ti ot PARK ya-u ,u/ 874.2 BP- d7 P i 1986.5 882.11 1E 58:4 I - AG�T��-�77�."-.''` 874.5 _ T� LP'dg444-' r g B dC J �i L t ;f /`893•' �- ", 851.1 853.8 8 1j 1 i la '-.JRA Pl n HE1GHf`s gP gffi l rjjj Rina_ n H t2 n EASEMEMt �� -' d� I w�q.` i'IIJ.I_I11. L T]-(TTr[T�I�Fii 999 4 809 ` F� t FFL QU?; 5 .r<sl 89.JL �x0 Rcz e 3:6 n , " rr 't2 }► 2r A5 4 � BFFB BP ff` kA(- �88�(�{�- 9�^905 � i ,- t 4+� �9 �`��E�� t 0a.� ���•'. "�ipM55t���+J` ��IIIIVVV�� 8 8. f ttiy S>L h4K L� 6fn a D P 908.0- L: T 914.0F BPJ34 oC 984.0 rE , In /aoe.o �, I P� 9 L.S.-21� oj, ,�y t LP -68 ' 911.0� (Qc.\ 9/B0 2{ fjl PARKVIEW 0 GOLF 5:21A COURSE _ -II LP46� I LP -20 L -58 0 .1 .), I ! 915.4 907. / `•� 9/7.3 916.2 I ` 9P77 LP -56 `'.I: ......... J \ LP -13 `92G.3 964.0 - '-.920.4 LP -7 97/.6; � 9220 r- �, LP- I I-� W f/ 27 RK � --• s4. r I dd JP -3.'- 4 ��'J-s J r JP -53 884.0 864.0 880.1 \ 926.0 v T. 945.0 2 _ _ �tI PLACE : I 956.0 tet ADD. I 969.4 w4 JP -50 964.0 8P -9p2 .r1 971.7 --681 J (j -"9034 WALNUT( HILL ryr 9- 3 - L•Kr PARK x84:4 L 69 893.6 ..Kh•�nD 863 Lf•1 itri ,(8678-_ Hy,uy -�ir;T � ) 930-- �= a•c , LP 46 rt L; i 8 EJG ' Tt�l- 8792 �-+� rx_• AJ 1 LP -37 1BBi_5Y LC4 - �` 0^6.1 878.3 v JJJ 11 880.6 � �i 88ss5 I le tz/LP.-36NIB¢•.6798'. 11-26) &..26 gALIZ- LP -45 -� A �\\ LP 865.0 \ l �,,.rJAKOTA �a f COUNTY LP -21 y' LP 24 P.4 R K 902.5 ♦ 883.2 903.0 � BB6.0 jP• 12 6e ? EYC€PT:. J + /` G4 (NPT INCLUDED LP 2 903.0 �^ 908.6 a j i \ ` 9/07 ovr cn V a 925.0 'r'JNTe' n 4i z•%-��- N 1.A 1 �9i�.;. 12' -LP-15 1 Lr ✓-J5� -��� �i w �ti 9/9.� -1P-66 DAK01COUNI-Y PARK 920.2 �•I f'• 4P-17 LP -10 LP -16 96' I RO�EMOUN7� - CHAPEL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH SUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan �- PUBLIC WORKS STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN FIG. #1, approved: standard plate #: C- i3: C I rl-40� ROSEN CHAPEL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH ............... ................ SUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER FIG. #2 approved standard plate #: i I I ''" 1-1 -'sitOyp-t, I ft. 52.6/6ff7.0 6 O 59.9/7! .ateP.x , lip .GE j:j2D 44.6/59.0 Z w - !D5 1020 1161 38.3/94.0 31.0 (ig-) dop & awo 16 op 00 885/ 82.8/ 40 106.0 . LX1 116" /�.7.01 V 4 o/ 5.0 42.61 7.0 165 12"172 --) 17 1% A 41?* 163 To. 432 5 Z8.6143.0 80.7/92.0 yrl 76.3/ 10 880 16 1 6 Au /87.0/0.0 - - 4 r 4 THOMAS 158 Y 16. 1/92-0 HEI -5 J C. I aRW SCHOOL 'TV ENT 93.5/104.0 2- ;3�v / 9 4.0 1 THOMAS LAKE PARK 5 Pfi�!169 '4-j T4 86.0/ _ SAFARI AT Q 7 57- 59.8/76.6 1 78 51.4 65.0 - 61 18.4/29.0 PATRICK EAGAN PARK --3', �-S•^� 6 OR OUF�TST�I.AIE A. 6 00 P.M. BOOSTER H.W.L. 1059 183 7' __1O 24" 14 182 68.0/ pl 1� i96 68.0/82.0 10201 -2 0/ ?'0 72.-Ol 20* 12" — - D LE1=EL- 35.5/50.0 238, 12" 68.7/74.0 185 >'+ 86.0/911.0 F 74A/82.0 I 20, 1-2- --%1qD rll"rl� E7 a 4 A• 70.8/76.1f. ' A LL L!L /58.0 1112! 175 201 26 --- -'F�J P4 5r840 r'7 58.0 2.02, !�,199 47.5/63.0 -4 -A ne, 9MD 54- ANT OW t020 0 'IT SIT EA ,Ar —-t34 L 'i M 11— 91.1/ 'M 213 I " 212 f 14; 4 --20� !4 tV74.0 (ED (DO 70.5/74.0 "47, 9. 2 M.G. GROUND STORAGE 6:.. 3000 G.P P.M. BOOSTERS WL g'mO.O 416H.W.11. 1055 R m7- 18 - j PARKVIEW GOLF DAKOTA COURSE I II COUNTY ...... ..... L8- I PA R K 5 N191 EYEP N (NOT INCL !CED 74.0 Q D4 65.6 1v PARK) DAKr,)TA '.0�.rfJNTY PARK - -: s I- - DAKQIA COU :Y PARK I ROs EIAOU CHAPEL HILL B A P T I S T CHURCH SUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. #3 approved - standard I plate #: EEEEEE Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. (612) - 866-8424 E PPPPP Consulting Engineers EEEEE P 6607 18TH Ave. So. E PPPPP Minneapolis, MN 55423 EEEEEE P Member Consulting Engineers Council/Minnesota City of Eagan Planning Department Re: Chapel Hill Baptist Church A note to the City Council, After a very lengthy time of negotiation and re -negotiation, Chapel Hill Baptist finally was able to complete the purchase of parcel' "H" of the Ohman estate on Pilot Knob road. Atthat time the church started meeting with the city to determine what requirements would have to be met, and at what times, to proceed with platting, rezoning and eventual construction on our new property. Since our initial meeting with the city we have hired an Architect who has designed for the church a master plan, we have continued to meet with the city, we have met with the county, we have compiled the extensive information required for a preliminary plat application, and we have continued in good faith, to the best of our ability, on a time line that would have allowed us to occupy our "new building" approximatly Thanksgiving 1987. At our first official meeting with the planners on 12/1/86, we were informed that in the previous week, the plat application for the property to the north of us (Fairway Hills) had been terminated. We were also informed that because city sewer and water had to come thru this property to the north of us, that we would not be allowed to build until the utilities were installed, unless a varience could be granted from the council. Chapel Hill Baptist Church is presently renting space from district #196, but the space that the school can provide will not be adaquate at the present rate of growth. The best time to leave the school and enter a new facility would be Thanksgiving '87. If things do not work out for that, a delay of 9 months or so could be tollerated but much beyond that would be a hardship on the church. Chapel Hill................varience request ................. page 1 In reaction to all of the above issues, Chapel Hill Baptist Church requests that the City Council grant a temporary varience to City Code Chapter #13 (Platting), Subdivision #14.A (Building permit not issued until a contract is signed for sewer & water). Article #14.D grants varience to lots that have private sewer systems (septic systems), and private water systems (wells), provided they meet city approval. The church requests that they be allowed to construct a septic system and well (to city standards) on the north side of the building (in the direction that sewer and water will be comming from in the future). At any time that the city requests that the church hook up to a sewer main & a water main, the church will make the connection and abandon the septic system. The well will be used for ground water cooling in the church's normal HVAC equipment. On behalf of Chapel Hill Baptist Church, 4j Paul Emanuelson Building Committee Member cc: Pastor John Peterson Larry Severson Committee Chapel Hill................varience request ................ page 2 Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1957, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen LONE OAR 2ND ADDITION, FINAL PLAT REVIEW TEMPORARY BUILDING PERMIT REQUEST H. Lone Oak 2nd Addition, Final Plat Condition Review and Temporary Building Permit Extension Request --On October 21, the Council gave authorization for the issuance of a foundation permit to allow the beginning of the construction of the Northwest Airlines Training Company facility within the proposed Lone Oak 2nd Addition. On December 16, the preliminary plat was approved for the Lone Oak 2nd Addition, incorporating 13 conditions of compliance before final plat approval. After final plat approval consideration, the Council then authorized the issuance of a building permit for the super structure (steel) only, to allow this development to continue prior to final plat approval. Enclosed on page Z�Z_ is a letter that the staff has received from Northwest Airlines, requesting Council consideration to omit condition #4 of the December 16 minutes for preliminary plat approval for the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. In addition to omitting condition #4 to the preliminary plat approval, the developer is requesting the City to issue a 90 day temporary building permit to allow them to proceed beyond the super structure phase while they continue to work out the utility, access and related easement acquisitions. Enclosed on pagesl4/3is that portion of the December 16 minutes pertaining to the previous issuance of the super structure permit. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny Lone Oak 2nd Addition's request for a temporary building permit and deletion of condition #4. /9a All NORTI-PNEEIT NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. -WORLD HEADQUARTERS • 2700 LONE OAK PARKWAY. EAGAN, MINNESOTA MAILING ADDRESS: MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ST. PAUL,MINNES�TAA 55111 - Ug7 January , �tff OFFICE OF VICE PRESIDENT PROPERTIES Mr. Tom Colbert Public Works Director City of Eagan Eagan MN Dear Mr. Colbert: A condition of the plat approval for Lone Oak 2nd Addition requires sanitary and storm sewer to be constructed from the South to serve this site as approved in the original P.U.D. NWA, Inc. has received agreement from the developers to the South that an acceptable align- ment can be determined across their property, however the timing of their development has made it impossible to accommodate our schedule. As a result we request the Council grant NWA, Inc. a 90 day temporary building permit extension in anticipation of resolving the specifics of the sanitary and storm sewer easement to the South. While we feel fully confident that an alignment will be achieved in a time frame that will satisfy the plat approval conditions prior to occupancy we are dependent upon other entities that have little or no interest in NWA, Inc.'s schedule. 'If necessary NWA is prepared to handle sanitary and storm sewer requirements through other means to complete the project. We would construct a temporary lift station connecting to the existing sanitary sewer that our HDQ building is served by. The storm water would be controlled within over 35 acres of ponding on our site. We would hold the City of Eagan harmless against any problem resulting from the temporary sanitary and storm water systems we would create. In addition at such time when per- manent facilities are available, NWA, Inc. would agree to connect to these as requested by the City. We regret being in the position of requesting another temporary permit but the extremely favorable weather has allowed our building to remain on schedule and the difficulty of gaining timely commitments from the new owners -to South was underestimated. However we are in discussion with these people and will continue to pursue efforts to complete the conditions precedent to final plat approval. Your favorable response to this request will be greatly appreciated by NWA, Inc. Sincer R. ames Thorne RJT:bao 012887.6 Council Minutes EXHIBIT "B' December 16, 1986 LONE OAR 2ND ADDITION — PRELIMINARY PLAT The application of Northwest Aerospace Training Corporation for preliminary plat approval of Lone Oak 2nd Addition consisting of a flight simulator training facility was next heard. Dale Runkle reviewed the application indicating that the Advisory Planning Commission at its meeting on November 25, 1986 recommended approval. The footprint of the building is approximately 103,600 square feet and the plat will cover only the area needed for Outlot A consisting of 15.15 acres with access from the west. 341 parking stalls will be provided in two separate lots with 553 spaces required in an office building. It was recommended, however, that because the aerospace building is a 24 hour facility and for a specific user group, that parking appeared to be sufficient and no further parking space is required, but that expansion area has been provided. After a presentation, there being no objections, Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to approve the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. The installation of trunk sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer facilities and the upgrading of O'Neil Drive to City standards shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 2. The acquisition of an MPCA Indirect Source Permit shall be required prior to final plat approval. 3. Ponding easements incorporating the required storm water capacity shall be dedicated with the final plat. 4. This development shall be responsible for providing the necessary easements for the construction of O'Neil Drive and the required sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer facilities prior to final plat approval. If they cannot be provided, the developer shall be financially responsible for all costs associated with the City's acquisition of both permanent and temporary construction easements for these public improvements. 5. The developer shall obtain all required DNR permits prior to final plat approval. 6. All internal utility and drainage easements necessary to incorporate public improvements shall be dedicated on the final plat. 7. All public improvements constructed within this development, whether performed privately or under City contract, shall be in conformance with City approved engineering standards. 8. The development shall be financially responsible for its proportionate share of the assessments associated with the development of this property. 9. The grading plan or the Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan shall be revised to accommodate the proposed surface water runoff associated with this development prior to final plat approval. /%L Council Minutes December 16, 1986 EXHIBIT "B' LONE OAR 2ND ADDITION — PRELIMINARY PLAT Council Minutes December 16, 1986 10. All existing drainage and utility easements required to be vacated shall be approved prior to the release of the plat for recording at the County. 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. This plat shall be subject to the parks dedication fee. 13. A detailed landscape plan shall- be submitted on an approved grading plan prior to the final plat submission. A financial guarantee shall also be submitted and not released until after a full year from the time of installation. All councilmembers voted yes, except: Blomquist who abstained. Mr. Hedges then explained that the applicant was also requesting a building permit for the erection of a steel superstructure, noting the hardship involved in waiting until the normal City requirements of final plat approval are completed. It is.expected to take about a month and a half to complete the final plat and Mr. Hedges noted the conflict with the City policy in granting building permits before final plat approval. Jim Thorn, Vice President of Real Estate for Northwest Airlines was present and stated that a significant delay will occur if the authorization to proceed is not granted, and that Northwest Airlines will cooperate in every possible way to ensure compliance with the final plat requirements. Mark Westin of M. A. Mortenson Construction Co. was present and noted the superstructure construction time will be from 8 to 10 weeks. After a lengthy discussion, Smith moved, Ellison seconded the motion to approve the application for building permit for the superstructure only, with the understanding that no other permits will be granted until the final plat is approved according to City requirements. All members voted affirmatively, except Blomquist who abstained. Ay3 Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen !-ADDITIONAL_- •ITEMS: - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS A. Public Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Contract 86-15, Final Payment/Acceptance (Hampton Heights - Trunk Water Main) --We have received a request for final payment from our consulting engineering firm, along with the certification of compliance with City approved plans and specifications for the installation of the trunk water main through the Hampton Heights subdivision. All final acceptance inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the fifth and final payment for Contract 86-15 (Hampton Heights - Trunk Water, Main) in the amount of $16,102.14 to Orfei and Sons Incorporated and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. Item 2. Contract 85-15, Final Payment/Acceptance (Royal Oak Circle - Streets and Utilities) --We have received a request for final payment from our consulting firm along with a certification of compliance to City approved plans and specifications for the installation of utilities to service the Royal Oaks Apartment development and the upgrading of Violet Lane west of Federal Drive. All final acceptance inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the ninth and final payment for Contract 85-15 (Royal Oak Circle - Streets and Utilities) in the amount of $35,424.14 to Orfei and Sons Incorporated and accept the improvements for perpetual maintenance. Item 3. Contract 85-21, Approve Change Order #5 (Maintenance Building) --Change Order #5 is broken down into two parts as follows: Part A: At the time of approval for Change Order #1 which provided for the extension to the equipment maintenance garage, final detail electrical plans had not been prepared to arrive at a firm cost estimate. Subsequently, there is an additional $379 associated with electrical needs (Add $379). Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty Part B: During the adjustment of the existing sump manhole (collecting the internal vehicle maintenance drainage system), it was discovered that the old field constructed structure could not be properly adjusted to accommodate the new design of the new vehicle storage building. In addition, after analyzing the waste oil in this drain field system, it was determined that the majority of this material had to be removed in compliance with hazardous waste rules and regulations. This resulted in cost beyond the scope of the original contract and results in this change order (Add $7,887). There have been sufficient contingencies included in the overall budget to provide for these additional costs. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #5 to Contract 85-21 in the amount of $8,266 and authorize the Mayor to execute all related documents. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS B. Private Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Contract 84-D, Final Acceptance (Lexington Square 1st Addition - Streets and Utilities) --The City has been informed by our consulting engineering firm that all streets and utilities servicing the Lexington Square 1st Addition have been installed in compliance with City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Contract 84-D (Lexington Square 1st Addition - Streets and Utilities) for final acceptance and perpetual maintenance. Item 2. Contract 86-K, Final Acceptance (Dallas Development lst Addition (Watermain Relocation) --We have received a report from a consulting engineering firm verifying compliance with City approved plans and specifications in the relocation of the existing trunk watermain to facilitate the development of the above Silver Bell Plaza Center. Based on final inspections performed by representatives of the Public Works Department, favorable action is recommended in response to this request for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Contract 86-K (Dallas Development 1st Addition - Trunk Watermain Relocation) for formal acceptance and perpetual maintenance. /i-,5' Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council meeting Page Twenty -One RESTRUCTURING PROGRAMS/SERIES 1980 C- Restructing Program for the Series 1980 --The Finance Committee fret on Wednesday, ,anuary 21, 1987, to review a restructuring program for the emeries 1980, Single -Family Mortgage Revenue Pond Program. Representatives of Miller & Schroeder Financial Inc., Paul Ekholm, Fred Morris, and john Wenker, were present at the meeting as well as the Director of Finance and City Admin- istrator. The City has an opportunity at this time to use residual funds that have accrued in the single-family mortgage revenue bond fund, Series 1980. As the City Council may recall, approximately $300,000 was conunited for a down -payment assistance program in April 1986 to assist first-time homebuyers who were approved for new mortgages in the $10,000,000 single-family program for low and moderate income as approved through the Dakota County HRA. The City's total amount of residuals is estimated to be approximately 1.3 to 1.4 million dollars. With the reduction of the down -payment assistance of $300,000, the net amount avail- able to the City is approximately $700,000 to $800,000. The Finance Committee has evaluated present value and is of the opinion that if a specific use or uses are defined by the City Council for use of the residual funds in 1987, these dollars should be withdrawn from the bond fund and designated for a City purpose. The City is not restricted to using the residual funds for housing -related projects. However, it was the opinion of the Finance Co-mmittee that a part of or all funds should be designated for possibly a senior housing project. If the residual funds are made available, it would be possible for the City to purchase land and pursue a senior housing project as an example with the Dakota County HRA. Any other uses that the City Council may wish to consider, should benefit the entire corrm--nunity such as seed money for an equipment fund or payment of the radio communications system. In any event, use of the -residual fund should be regarded as a one-time capital investment for the commun4ty and treated similar to the use of federal revenue sharing funds. It is suggested that they not be used as a revenue source for the City's operating budget. The City Administrator requested a memo from Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., that outlined many of the questions that were raised at the Finance Committee meeting and provided the appro- priate background information for the City Council. A copy of that memo is enclosed on pages '7 through. The estimated cost of issuance totals approximately $300,000. That cost plus the commitment toward the down -payment assistance 1�4 Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two program is the reason the net amount available to the Ci-cy is between $700,000 and $800,000. After speaking with the City's auditor, it is possible for the City to manage the restructuring program and retain each of the consultants or contractors as listed in Exhibit A. The Director of Finance says it would be agreeable to manage the program which might save the City of Eagan some expenses and generate additional residual funds. Whether the advisory/management fee or bond insurance premium could be reduced any further by the City's being involved with all other contractors would have to be further negotiated. In summary, the City could proceed with the restructuring program due to the favorable interest rates and further discuss a specific use for the residual funds. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) Approve or deny the restructuring program for the Series 1980, single-farmily mortgage revenue bond program, 2) designate or provide direction for the designation of the residual proceeds and 3) retain the firm of Piller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., as the advisory/management firm for the transaction with or without direct involvement by the City's Director of Finance as it relates to all other consultants and contractors. Toll Free Minnesota (800) 862-6002 Toll Free Other States (800) 328-6122 er & Schroeder Fm' anciai, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center • 7900 Xerxes Avenue South • P.O. Box 789 • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 (612) 831-1500 January 23, 1987 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RE: Restructuring Program for the Series 1980 City of Eagan, MN Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program Dear Tom: Thank you once again for allowing us the time to make a presentation to the Finance Committee. The purpose of this letter is to provide an overview of the proposed restructuring as it has evolved over the last several months and also to specifically address the issues which arose at the Finance Committee meeting. You will recall that at the time the 1980 bonds were issued, several detailed cash flow schedules were prepared and submitted to Standard & Poor's Corporation for a rating analysis and the assignment of a rating on the bonds. In that analysis, Standard & Poor's insisted that the program's cash flows simulate several "worst case" situations, including cases where no loans were originated by the program, cases where only half of the loans were originated and cases where all of the loans experienced early pre -.payments within their first five years. We now know, six years after the bonds were issued, that none of these worst case results have materialized and even a conservative analysis of the program's cash flows at this time indicates that a substantial amount of "residual" or excess income has been generated by the program. However, under the terms of the documents that were prepared fo'r the issue, all of these excess revenues are "trapped" by the program until all of the bonds have been retired. In April, 1986 the Eagan City Council, in anticipation of a new $10,000,000 single family program for low and moderate income first-time homebuyers, passed a resolution allowing the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority to issue, on the City's behalf, a taxable zero coupon bond secured by the residual value of the 1980 single family program. The proceeds from the sale of the taxable zero coupon bond (anticipated to be $300,000) were to be used to provide a downpayment assistance program to mortgagors using the new single family program. The new single family program has been on hold for several months now due to 17 Headyuahers. Minneapolis, Minnesota Branch Offices: Solana Beach, California -St. Paul, Minnesota • Milwaukee, Wisconsin -San Francisco, California Memheroi,he Srnuu iex I mexur Prorccunn I]ugr,rauun Mr. Thomas Hedges January 23, 1987 Page Two the continued downward trend in conventional mortgage rates; we do not want to issue the new bonds until a mortgage rate can be established which we know will be competitive for the full origination period. As time passed in 1986, it occurred to us that a program could be developed which released the built-up residuals in certain single family programs. To that end, we have developed a "Restructuring Program" which involves the liquidation of certain reserve funds at an attractive premium and the downsizing of other reserve funds to meet the necessities of today's outstanding bond levels. The restructuring program involves the use of bond insurance to raise the bond rating to a "AAA" level, thus ensuring the program trustee, bondholders, and bond counsel of the ongoing viability of the program. The restructuring would involve an amendment to the Trust Indenture, but would not alter any existing contractual arrangements of the City or in any way affect the City's ongoing relationship with the trustee, servicer or mortgagors under the mortgage program. All funds made available may be used imme- diately for any purpose permitted under applicable state law and are not restricted by any indenture povisions. The restructuring program is market driven in that today's low interest rates allow the sale of the treasury security backing the debt service reserve fund at an attractive premium. At the Finance Committee meeting on January 21, 1987 several questions arose regarding the restructuring program: 1. How much monies could the restructuring program provide? The restructuring would provide gross residuals between $1.3 and $1.4 million (we currently estimate $1,360,763). The final number is dependent on negotiations with the bond insurer regarding cash flow runs and TICOR reserves; and the program trustee and compliance agent regarding ongoing fees. Transaction costs for the program will be approximately $290,000 (as shown on Exhibit A). Also, the City had committed $300,000 to the down payment assistance program. Thus, the net amount available to the City will be somewhere between $700,000 and $800,000 (currently estimated at $770,000). 2. Is it better for the City to take monies out now through the restructuring program or wait until all the bonds are paid off and receive the residuals in later years? Mr. Thomas Hedges January 23, 1987 Page Three The answer to this question can be arrived at through a present value analysis. However, an analysis of residual value is dependent on some subjective determination of the prepayment levels for mortgage loans. This analysis assumes prepayments based on a three year average life of the mort- gage portfolio. This is somewhat slower than has actually occurred over the last several months, but is probably a good estimate of prepayments over the next several years. Under this analysis, if the 1980 program was left alone, the present value of the estimated residuals is $1,191,537. This does not include the commitment to the downpayment assistance program for $300,00, which would actually cost an additional $75,000 - $100,000 in costs of issuance, so that the net amount to the City would be approximately $800,000. These monies would flow to the City over time beginning in late 1997 and lasting until late 2011. Thus, the present value difference between doing a restructuring program or leaving the program alone is currently estimated to be approximately $30,000. If a restructuring program occurs, the City, in addition to the monies received immediately, will receive any residuals that build up from this point forward. 3. If the restructuring program took place, what is the amount of residuals that could build up from this point in time? What's the best case and worst case? Again, the answer to this question is dependent upon the actual prepayment levels of the mortgage loan portfolio. Using our three-year average life assumption, the present value of remaining residuals is approximately $4,900. Using the best case, a zero prepayment assumption, could provide for further residuals of approximately $700,000. The zero prepayment assumption, although providing the "best case" situation, will in all probability not occur. 4. What are the transaction costs involved with the restructuring program? These are detailed on Exhibit A. 5. What can the released monies be used for? All funds made available may be used immediately for any purpose permitted under applicable state law. Mr. Thomas Hedges January 23, 1987 Page Four Tom, the opportunity to complete a restructuring transaction is market driven; current low interest rates provide the ability to liquidate, at a substantial premium, the treasury security in the debt service reserve fund. However, it is also possible to provide funds for the downpayment assistance program through the sale of taxable zero coupon bonds, as originally planned. As always, Paul Ekholm, Fred Morris and I are available to provide additional information or answer any questions that may arise. Sincerely, MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL, INC. Wenker Assistant Vice President JGW/blh Enclosures CC: Eugene VanOverbeke Paul Ekholm Fred Morris 1/21/87 JGW EXHIBIT A City of Eagan, Minnesota Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program Series 1980 ESTIMATED COSTS OF ISSUANCE - Restructuring Program Bond Insurance Premium (1st year's premium) $62,344 Mortgage Insurance Transfer Premium 8,625 Underwriter's Counsel (Kutak, Rock & Campbell.) 35,000 Trustee (including counsel) 13,000 Cash Flow Simulations 46,000 Laventhol Horwath (Cash Flow Verification) 15,000 G.I.C. Securization/Securities Trades 18,000 Issuer's Counsel 5,000 Servicer 3,000 Miscellaneous/Travel 1.500 Sub -Total $207,469 Advisory/Management Fee 85,000 TOTAL 5292,469 Zo/ Agenda Information Memo, February 3, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three UPDATE AND STATUS/COLLECTIVE BARGAINING DEMANDS D. Update and Status Regarding Collective Bargaining Demands --The City Administrator will present a contract ratification for a two (2) year contract between the clerical unit and the City of Eagan. The clerical unit has agreed to the City Council's last proposal which will be outlined by the City Administrator if requested at the meeting on Tuesday. As a part of the Administrative Agenda on Monday, the City Administrator will provide additional information regarding collective bargaining demands as an informative update and request certain direction. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To ratify a two (2) year contract between the clerical employees and City of Eagan per a contract proposal made by the City of Eagan at the January 20, 1987, meeting. 7Uv