Loading...
04/07/1987 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL APRIL 7, 1987 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE .� II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL .OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - TAX ABATEMENTS - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE IV. 6:45 --DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS p-4 A. Parks Department i5 B. Fire Department V. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA Z3 A. Personnel Items .26 B. Plumbers Licenses ,Z91C. New Manager (Liquor License) LaFonda's Restaurant .70 Resolution Regarding Commercial Recycling .33 E. Vacate Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Norwest 2nd Addition) 3q F. Approve Final Plat, Fairway Hills %G. Project 499, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Chapel Hill Baptist Church) P.3%H. Project 500, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Briar Oaks of Apple Valley) p•37 I. Project 501, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition) P7 J` Approve Final Plat, Lexington Square 6th Addition .3 . K. Approve Final Plat, Burr Oak Hills Addition Pp.Z L. Approve Resolution Requesting MnDOT Speed Study/Authorization (Miscellaneous a�: ( Streets) VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS VII. OLD BUSINESS p.46 A. Conditional Use Permit (Blackhawk Plaza, Inc.) to Allow Gas Pumps and Service B on Se rate Lots at the Blackhawk Plaza at the NE Intersection of R. pa Blackhawk, and Diff ley Roads in the SE1A Sec 32 VIII. - - NEW BUSS 5y' A. -Special Assessments and Water Revenue Bonds Refunding B. Variance to Allow a 17' Canopy Setback Variance- Along Pilot Knob Rd for the SuperAmerica Facility at the SW Intersection of Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle -P-r, C. Road?s V ti nce To Allow Change in Sideyard Setback -Requirements for Kalvin Hedlund 11 F d Steven Johnson, Lot 6, Block 3, Rahn Ridge Addition 47 D. Variance to' Al low Change in Frontyard Setback Requirements for Edward L. Gallagher, Lot 16, Black 5, Cedar Grove 2nd Addition -F.7 Z E. Variance to Allow Change in Frontyard Setback Requirements for Michael Marxer, Lot 1, Block 1, Greensboro 1st Addition 7 'p / '� F. Waiver of Plat to Allow a Duplex Lot Split for Advance Developers, Inc., at Lots 1, 4 & 5, Block 1, Suncliff 3rd Addition G. Special Permit to Allow One 4' X 8' Two -Directional Signs for Coldwell Banker at NW1%4 of Section 34 . H. Waiver of Plat (James Unker) in order to split Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Pg� Addition, into 2 separate 1/2 acre parcels abutting Cliff Road to the south and east of Lenore Lane in the SE 1/4 of Sec 29 )a� I. Preliminary Plat (Overview 2nd Addition - Dunn Real Estate) consisting of (1) .98 acre lot located on the west side of Dodd Road just north of Golden Meadow Road in the NW1/4 of Section 25. J. Conditional Use Permit (Madison Pizza Corp.) for a drive-thru facility, pylon sign, and beer sales, located in Lot 2, Block 1, Flour Bin 1st Addition in the NE1/4 of Section 31. )Z� K. Waiver of Plat (Joyce & Reuben Meissner) in order to split Lot 4, Block 1, of the Killdeer Addition for separate ownership in this (NB) Neighborhood Business District located in the NW1/4 of Section 12 on the east side of Hwy 149. ep. 135 L. Rezoning - Mueller School Site (ISD #196) of 28.43 acres to a Public Facility Park designation, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Preliminary Plat for an elementary school located on the north side of Wescott Road east of Lexington Ave. in the SE1/4 of Section 14. M. Replat of the Safari at Eagan Shopping Center (Linvill Properties, Inc.) to the f Thomas Lake Center, Safari at Eagan along the north side of Cliff Road, west of Thomas Lake Road in the SW1/4 of Section 28. .17 N. Planned Development Amendment (Winkler Jackson PD - Richard Winkler) - And Rezoning of (3) R-2 (Duplex) Lots to R-1 (Single Family) on Block 1 of the Oak Cliff Addition Located West of Slaters Road and South of Cliff Road in the ,175 0. NW1/4 of Section 31. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment (Walley & Michael Nelson) and Rezoning o{ 110,175 Lot 4, Carlson Acres from R-1 (Single Family) to LB (Limited Business) located at the SW intersection of Pilot Knob and Diff ley Roads in the NE1A of Sec 20 11 P. Ordinance Amendment to the City Code, Chapter 11.20 Subdivision 11C, to Require Service Bays in General Business Districts with Motor Fuel Sales. Q. Replat (LeMay Lake Hills - Al Kempf) of a Townhouse Project to Convert from Rental to Owner Occupancy Status, Located in the NW 1/4 Section 10, at the SE Intersection of Pilot Knob and Lone Oak Roads. I%. - ADDITIONAL ITEMS A. Public Improvement Contracts -p,J9a 1. Contract 87-11, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Greensboro 2nd Addition) r ((70 2. Contract 87-12, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Lexington Square �• 6th/Northview Park Road) 170 3. Contract 87-14, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Eagan Hills Farm/Country Hallow) �Jq 4. County Contract 32-18, Approve Plans/Resolution (Cliff and Galaxie Signals) •,�� b 5. Contract 85-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storr Sewer and Streets) 6. Contract 87-1, Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize Ad for Bids (Park I Construction for Six Parks) �•J56 7. Contract 87-13, Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize Ad for Bids 'Q (Park Shelter Buildings) I 8. Contract 86-2, Approve Supplemental Agreement #3 (Nicols Road) 7 9. Contract 86-23, Approve Change Order #2 (Holland Lake Outlet)J, B. Private Improvement Contracts x� 'p 19 1. Contract -83-F, Final Acceptance (St.Francis Woods 3rd Add) �•1� q 2. Contract 85-D, Final Acceptance (Westbury 4th Addition) �rG p 3. Contract 85-Q, Final Acceptance (Blackhawk Townhouse Apts) X. ! 1 - VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) %I. - ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 4, 1987 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION APPROV& MINUTES/AGEND After approval is given to the April 7, 1987, agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the March 17, 1987 meeting, the following items are noted for consideration: MAD6. ASATMl4EN;T ,DACC A* C ' A SESSOR: OM, - There were two tax abatements presented to the City for properties described as Parcel 10-72988-120-02 and the property owner is Dennis and Nancy Raas and the second parcel is described as 10-84473-010-01 and the property owners are Dan and Patricia Dee. Mr. Bill Peterson of the Dakota County Assessors Office is planning to be present to review the two (2) tax abatements with the City Council. RAAS PROPERTY The tax abatement as requested for Dennis and Nancy Raas property was described as follows by the assessor's office: "upon review of the property, it was found that a mathematical error in calculating the square footage was done. It should be less than the aforementioned. Therefore, the estimated market value should be reduced from $110,800 to $91,600 and the assessed valuation should be reduced from $24,524 to $19,148 for 1986, taxes payable in 1987. DEE PARCEL Upon review of the property the valuation should have been at 75% completion instead of 100%. Therefore, the estimated market value should be reduced from $106,300 to $76,500 and the assessed value should be reduced from $26,514 to $18,170 for 1986, taxes payable in 1987." The Engineering Department has prepared a map that indicates the loc-ation of each parcel and a copy or copies are enclosed on page or pages 7- through �. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE MATTER: To approve or deny the tax abatement for 1) the Dennis and Nancy Raas property and 2) the Dan and Patricia Dee property. U Parcel No. 10-84473-010-01 Dan & Patricia Dee Z.- c� cc w F_. u Lu v 4J U. LJ ry Parcel No. 10-72988-120-02 Dennis & Nancy Raas Agenda Information Memo April 4, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Two A. PARRS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Item 1. Highview Park Skating Rink -- The Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending that the City abandon continued maintenance of the hockey building and shelter building at Highview Park. In place of the hockey, rink and shelter building, the City would provide an open skating area in Highview Park. For additional information on this item refer to a memo prepared by the Director of Parks and Recreation which is enclosed on pages through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission recommendation to discontinue the hockey rink and shelter building in Highview Park and maintain the same area as an open skating area in future years. d MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL THOMAS L. HEDGES/CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA/DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MARCH 11, 1987 SUBJECT; HIGHVIEW PARK SKATING RINK Attached is a staff memorandum to the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission pertaining to Highview Skating Rink. The issue is relative to whether the City should continue to maintain a hockey rink and a shelter building at Highview Park or to discontinue operation of these facilities in the future years. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Action: The Commission reviewed the staff report dated March 2nd and after discussion recommended to the City Council that the hockey rink and park shelter building be removed from the park. In it's place, the Commission recommended that an open skating area be maintained. Benches for outside skate changing and adaptation for the lighting fixtures be made to facilitate this open skating rink operation. The Commission made the recommendation to eliminate the hockey facility because of the expense involved for replacement of the hockey boards and shelter building estimated at between thirty two thousand and thirty six thousand dollars. Further, that the limited use of the facility did not warrant this replacement particularly since the City will be -constructing two new hockey facilities at Quarrey Hill Park and approving the skating facility at Pilot Knob Park. For Council Action: To approve/disapprove of the Advisory Parks and Recreationommission's actions regarding Highview Rink or to make a subsequent/1re/ommendat ion. Director of Parks & Recreation Attachments KV/af MENTO TO: -ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MARCH 2, 1987 HE: HIGHVIEW SKAT12IG RINK The purpose of this agenda item is to discuss the continuation of maintaining the warming house/shelter building at Highview Park for future skating seasons. AAMrRnn" Highview Park has had an open skating and hockey rink for a number of years. The warming house is a "temporary" facility, with an estimated age of fourteen to fifteen years. The building is now in generally poor condition. Skating attendance at Highview Park has been historically very, very low. Three years ago, the department discontinued having the shelter building open on Mondays through Thursdays during school days. An attendant was assigned on weekends and during Christmas vacation hours. Broomball games have been scheduled at this rink on Sundays and Mondays in an attempt to make use of this facility, and to alleviate burdens at other facilities. Staff anticipates that broomball will be moving to Quarry Park for the 1987/88 winter season. FACILITY CONDITIONS The warming house at Highview is in poor condition. The structure is approximately fourteen years old, and was considered a temporary facility at the time it was placed in the park. The hockey rink is in very poor condition, with the hockey boards falling in, as a result of soil conditions pushing against the exterior of the boards. Staff has attempted to repair the boards repeatedly, but the rotting wood timbers often failed to hold the nails securely. Little more can be done to repair the boards, unless a complete replacement/rebuilding is done. Maintenance Staff have expressed concern for safety of the hockey rink users, because of loose boards, etc. The hockey lights are in fair to good condition, certainly adequate for today's needs. COST As stated before, the rink is attended at a lesser schedule than other facilities. Attendant cost is programmed at 280/300 hours per season, or $1,250/$1,500 per season. Staff does not have a cost for ice maintenance, but it is assumed to be very comparable with most other skating locations within the community. ATTENDANCE Attendance again this year reflects very few skaters. Even during Christmas vacation, and on days in which other facilities note a significant number of skaters, this site continues to record low attendance. ISSUE At issue is a continuation of this facility at it's current programming level. With the moving of broomball from Highview to Quarry Park, use of this facility will continue to drop. As noted previously, there is relatively little attendance at this facility. This, combined with the issue of expensive replacement of the hockey rink and warming house facility; staff questions whether it is the desire and direction of the Commission to continue use, or to provide an alternate service. Replacement of the hockey rink and the warming houses is estimated at approximately $32,000 to $36,000 for the building and hockey rink. Open skating could continue with the City maintaining a pleasure skating rink, but removing both the hockey and warming house facility. This would be similar to the situation at Cedar Pond Park and Country Home. Lighting of the area could be accomplished with the use of an electric eye or timing clock for turning on/off of the lights. Another alternative would be to simply remove the hockey rink, warming house, and lights, and discontinue this park for open skating altogether. SUMMATION There has been limited use of Highview Park for open skating. Hockey boards and the warming house are in poor condition. Replacement of both would be necessary if the City is to continue use of the site at it's present level of service. Repair is not an option, unless it would be extensive, because of the rotting wood and expense involved relative to the benefit. One option is to remove the hockey rink and warming house, but maintain the pleasure skating area. FOR COMMISSION ACTION To recommend (a) replacement of the building and hockey rink, (b) remove the warming house and hockey rink in favor of maintaining a pleasure skating rink only, (c) remove the warming house and hockey rink, and discontinue the use of the site for a winter skating facility. 7 2 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Three DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS CONTINUED: Item 2. Bid Approval for Mowing Equipment --The Director of Parks and Recreation has completed a bidding process for the replacement of two (2) existing Toro Groundmaster units and the acquisition of an additional unit. The existing units were purchased in 1978/1979. The original intent for the 1987 budget was to trade in the basic units, removing a cab and broom attachment from one unit for reuse due to the fact that they were in good serviceable condition. Bidding was performed cooperatively with the city of Burnsville. For additional information on this item and background information on the com etitive bidding process, please refer to pages _ through The Director of Parks and Recreation will be resent 9 P at the mee ing on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the bids for replacement of two (2) Toro Groundsmaster mowing units. A I MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR PZY FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MARCH 31, 1987 RE: BID APPROVAL - MOWING EQUIPMENT BACKGROUND: The City Council has approved the replacement of two existing Toro Groundsmaster units and the acquisition of an additional unit. The existing units were purchased in 1978 and 1979. Staff's original intent was to trade in the basic units, removing a cab and broom attachment from one unit for re- use due to the fact that they were in good, serviceable condition. Bidding was done cooperatively with the City of Burnsville. This City will retain three (3) other Toro units, which have been purchased in the last four years. COMPETITIVE BIDDERS John Deere Company has recently become a strong, competitive bidder against the Toro product. Although, the John Deere machine has been on the market for some time, it has only recently modified it's design to become very similar to the Toro product. This no doubt, in order to compete "head on" with the Toro unit. Toro has long been considered the standard of the industry. John Deere has also taken on an "aggressive" position in bidding it's equipment, in order to gain a market foothold. This aggressive bidding has worked to the advantage of purchasers of mowing equipment, as the price submitted by Toro is substantially less than that which was quoted the last time the City received bids for identical Toro equipment. COMPARISONS Staff has done a comparative analysis between the two machines. Due to the fact that John Deere has designed their machines after the Toro unit, there is very little difference between the two units. Please see the attached memorandum from John VonDeLinde, which details these differences. The biggest issue that staff has identified is a lack of interchangeability between the attachments of the Toro unit and that of the John Deere. That is, the brooms, blower, and R.O.P.S cab are not compatible and can not be switched between units. This is of significant importance to the department in instances whereby the basic unit i.e., prime mover, breaks down and a switching between the prime mover and the attachments need to be made to accomplish the work needed. Please keep in mind that the City will still retain three (3) Groundsmasters. 7 The second significant difference is in the size of the mowing deck. John Deere is 88" versus 76" for Toro. This size difference is significant, because the City trailers which are used to transport the groundsmasters are not able to accept the larger 88" deck size. Larger trailers would have to be purchased to accept these units if the bid is awarded to John Deere. BID PRICES Bids were opened and the results were tabulated as follows: TORO JOHN DEERE NET DIFFERENCE Base Bid $21,576. $21,090. $1486. Attachments 7,673. 6,889. 784. Sub Total 29,249. 27,979. $1,270. BID ANALYSIS The bid by John Deere is $486.00 lower than Toro for the base bid, and with the various attachments that are required, would total $1,270.00 less than Toro. Toro and John Deere have offered trade-in of $5,700 and $7,400 respectively. This widens the net difference between the two bids to $2,970. However, due to the original bid specifications, it was intended that the department make use of existing attachments, therefore, would be an additional cost of $1,952. to bring the John Deere equipment into a workable condition for intergration into the department. Thus, the total net difference between Toro and John Deere of $1,018., would be in favor of the John Deere unit. STAFF DISCUSSION Although, the acquisition of the John Deere units would be approximately $1,000 less in cost, several concerns remain: 1. Lack of compatibility between the attachment of the John Deere and Toro units. 2. Mowing decks of the John Deere being larger, are not compatible with existing trailers. 3. A change to John Deere would require the City to add to it's inventory of spare parts needed to maintain the John Deere equipment. /6 It is staff's opinion that any savings achieved in the acquisition of the John Deere units will be more than lost, in the creation of a minimal inventory of necessary spare parts for the John Deere units. Combined with the other two issues previously mentioned, staff's opinion is that it would cost the City more to acquire the John Deere units than is saved in the bid price. Consequently, in the best interests of the City, staff is recommending that the bid award be made to Toro, MTI, Incorporated. The bids received are within the budgeted amount. FOR COUNCIL ACTION To award the bid for the mowing equipment in the best interest of the City. KV/bls Attachments MEMO TO: 1987 EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION FILE FROM: JOHN VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARRS DATE: MARCH 3, 1987 SUBJECT: ANALYSIS OF JOHN DEERE RIDING MOWERS The Cities of Eagan and Burnsville are currently preparing specifications for the acquisition of new 1987 rotary type, 72- inch,,riding lawn mowers. Both Cities have used Toro Groundsmaster lawn mowers as their primary turf maintenance equipment. Both Cities have had a good track record with the Toro and are writing specifications around that unit. Analysis of the market, however, has shown that the John Deere Corporation is manufacturing a unit with similar features and capabilities. This memo will attempt to outline the staff's analysis of the John Deere mower and point out difficulties of integrating the John Deere mower with the City's current fleet. John Deere vs. Toro Groundsmaster - Features Analysis of the John Deere line by City staff has revealed the following perceived advantages. 1. Larger fuel system, i.e., 11 gallons vs. 8.5 gallons 2. Power steering as a standard feature (although this may be a disadvantage during snow removal on ice). 3. ROPS cab is roomier and provides better visability. 4. Access to the battery and other instrument components appears to be easier with the John Deere. 5. 72 -inch deck offers heavier gauge steel and heavier blades. 6. Deck lift is higher, providing easier accessibility over curbs. 7. Prime mover offers quick couple linkup to accessories. 8. Forward and reverse speeds are controlled by a two -pedal system (this would appear to cut down on employee fatigue). However, some employees indicated a preference for the one - pedal system. 9. Cruise control is a standard feature. Staff also noted the following disadvantages associated with the John Deere mower. 1. Top speed on the mower unit is 7 miles per hour. This could place potential limitations on time efficiency of the mower in open mowing conditions. /Z 1987 EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION FILE MARCH 3, 1987 PAGE TWO 2. The hydrostatic and other mechanical systems require the use of three different types of fluids. In contrast, the Toro uses one type of fluid in all systems. 3. The rear wheels on the mowing deck are significantly smaller and contain no grease zerks. This may increase the potential for turf damage in wet conditions. 4. The mowing deck on the 72 -inch unit is a unibody construction. There is no flip -up chute which is useful during tall grass conditions. 5. This is the first year that John Deere has used a diesel engine. Though it is equivalent in horse power, it does not have a demonstrated track record. Integration Of John Deere Line A review of the specifications and field tests indicates that both machines have comparable qualities and features. However, the greatest drawback would appear to be integration of the John Deere line into the existing line of prime movers and attachments in the City fleet. Problems associated with integration include: 1. The fixed deck on the John Deere 72 -inch mower has a width of 88". This width would preclude the loading of this deck onto existing trailers. The capacity of current trailers is a maximum of -84". 2. The John Deere mowing deck is a right discharge design; the Toro is a left discharge design. This contrary design feature would create conflicts of use between these mowers at the same site. 3. Acceptance of the John Deere mower would necessitate the purchase of additional inventory repair supplies. This would create an additional up -front expense for the City of $1,500 to $2,000. 4. Additional commitments of staff time would be required to educate and train employees on routine preventative maintenance and repairs. Associated paperwork related to maintenance would also increase. 5. The flexiblility and compatibility of accessories (mowing decks, snow blowers, and brooms) would be reduced with the addition of the John Deere line. John Deere accessories are not compatible with Toro prime movers and vice versa. This factor would have the net result of decreasing the efficiency of the fleet and accessories. Interchangeability of accessories between machines would be more restrictive with the addition of a new line of mowing equipment. /3 1987 EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION FILE MARCH 3, 1987 PAGE THREE 6. Included in the City's current mower fleet are four ROPS cabs, two brooms, and two snow blowers. The acquisition of a non -Toro line would leave the City with three Toro mowers. This would necessitate the trade-in of one ROPS cab and at least one attachment. In exchange, the City would be put in a position of acquiring a new ROPS cab and at least one new accessory for the new acquisitions (John Deere). This would be an additional unanticipated cost of accepting a non -Toro product. The net result would be an increase of $2,000 to $3,000 in additional cost to the City. All existing cabs and accessories are in good working order. Conclusion An analysis of the Toro Groundsmaster and John Deere mowers indicates a comparability in standard equipment and features. John Deere has made several modifications in the past few years to bring it in closer line with Toro specifications. Despite these specifications, the Toro line continues to demonstrate a solid reputation with years of dependable service to our City. While John Deere may offer a comparable product, its newness on the market raises some questions about life expectancy. The addition of the John Deere line to the existing fleet raises concerns relative to compatibility of accessories, conflicts in mowing deck design, adaptability to existing trailers, added expenses in inventory control, additional staff commitments for training and maintenance documentation, costs of trading in useable equipment, and lack of a lengthy service record on the John Deere mower and drive train components. a Superintenden Parks cc: Jim McGuffee, Park Supervisor Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation J V/mc/af Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Four DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS CONTINUED: B. FIRE DEPARTMENT: Item 1. Fire Department Business -- During the fall of 1986, action was taken to pursue site locations for Fire Stations 4 and 5, hire an architect to begin design work and cost estimates for Fire Station 4 and direct the Fire Department Building Committee to review station aides as well as equipment needs. It was anticipted that a land acquisition specifically for Fire Station 4 and selection of an architect would be completed between the months from January through March and a referendum held in the late spring so that Fire Station 4 can be constructed during this calendar year. The City has retained their architectural services of Art Dickey & Associates who has specialized in the design and construction of fire stations. They have completed conceptual design work and cost estimates for Fire Station 4. The City has offered a purchase agreement for the acquisition of Fire Station 4 and is hopeful that that purchase agreement will be executed within the next several days. At a special City Council Work Session held on Tuesday, March 31, it was determined that City Council would consider at the April 7 City Council Meeting 1) setting the bond referendum date for May 26 and 2) decide the amount in question that will appear on the referendum. A representative of the architectural firm, fire chief and City Administrator will provide further information on the cost and present a design concept for Fire Station 4 at the meeting on Tuesday. As a part of the action for the May 26 meeting, specific direction should be given to the City Attorney to draft a specific question or questions that will appear on the May 26 ballots. Enclosed on pages__ through.._ is a copy of a memo written by the Director of Finance that includes debt schedules prepared by Miller and Schroeder. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) establish Tuesday, May 26, as the date for a special election to consider a bond referendum for a new fire station or fire stations, 2) direct the City Attorney to prepare the questions for the referendum which will be considered at the April 21 meeting. 15 MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: APRIL 3, 1987 SUBJECT: 1987 FIRE STATION, LAND AND EQUIPMENT BONDS Per your request, I have assembled some information regarding debt service schedules, mill rates and taxes payable for two different -sized issues, each with 15 and 20 -year amortization schedules. Amounts were determined as follows: ISSUE SIZE #1: Land (Station 4) $ 50,000 Land (Station 5) 75,000 Building & Furnishings (Station 4) 430,000 Pumpers (3) 525,000 Issue 1 Subtotal $1,080,000 Issuance Costs 70,000 Bond Sale Total $1,150,000 ISSUE SIZE #2: Number 1 Subtotal $1,080,000 Building & Furnishings (Station 5) 430,000 Pumper (1) and Equipment 210,000 Issue 2 Subtotal $1,720,000 Issuance Costs 80,000 Bond Sale Total $1,800,000 Miller and Schroeder was asked to run the debt service schedules based on a Summer or Fall 1987 issuance with the first tax installment collected in 1988 and the first principal payment made February 1, 1989. The schedules as attached show interest payments in 1988 which would not work unless the bond amounts were increased to include money for those interest payments. I do not believe this causes a problem for the current comparative purposes of these schedules but it would have to be addressed. The schedules also assume relatively level debt service payments over the 15 or 20 -year periods; consequently, any increase to total City assessed valuation would reduce the mill rate or taxes payable for any particular property owner. The other option, of course, would be to estimate an overall increase to assessed valuation and increase the debt service payments each year over the life of the bonds to maintain a constant mill rate or taxes payable amount. As you recall, the latter method was used with the 1984 Park Improvement Bonds while the Municipal Center Expansion Bonds follow the first method. 1987 FIRE STATION, LAND & EQUIPMENT BONDS APRIL 3, 1987 PAGE TWO The following table summarizes the impacts of these two different sized issues based on these assumptions: $1,150,000 Issue (#1) $1,800,000 Issue (#2) 15 Yr. Amt. 20 Yr. Amt. 15 Yr. Amt. 20 Yr. Amt. Approximate Annual Installment (Excluding 1988 Interest as Shown) Net Interest Rate Average Bond Life Assessed Valuation for 1987 Taxes Payable (1) Estimated Assessed Valuation for 1988 Taxes Payable (Approx. 10% Increase) Mill Rate for 1988 Taxes Payable Annual Dollar Impact On $80,000 Market Value House (2) Annual Dollar Impact On $100,000 Market Value House (2 ) 125,000 105,000 195,000 165,000 6.255% 6.596% 6.252% 6.5920 8.91 yrs. 12.29 yrs. 8.89 yrs. 12.26 yrs. $270,660,726 $300,000,000 .417 .350 .650 .550 $7 $6 $10 $9 $9 $8 $14 $12 (1) Net of fiscal disparities contribution, effect of distribution is not considered. (2) Calculated for taxes payable with estimated 1988 mill rates above with no state law changes. 17 1987 FIRE STATION, LAND & EQUIPMENT BONDS APRIL 3, 1987 PAGE THREE It would also be appropriate to consider selling the bonds at two different times if the second option were chosen. Voter approval can be given up to a specific dollar amount but that amount does not have to be sold at one time. The current tax law makes it impractical to issue bonds unless the proceeds can be spent within six (6) months. Please let me know if you would like any additional information or if you would like to discuss this in more detail. Financ Director/City Clerk EJV/af $1,150,000 G.O. Fire Station Bonds of 1987 City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Debt Service Schedule Issue Date: 8/01/87 Settlement Date: 8/01/87 First Coupon: /01/88 Estimated Date ----- Principal --------- Coupon ------ Interest -------- Debt Service ------------ 2/01/88 0.00 0.000 34,05B.75 34,05B.75 8/01/88 0.00 0.000 34, 058. 75 34, 058.75 2/01/89 55, 000, 00 4.300 34, 058. 75 89, 058. 75 8/01/89 0.00 0.000 32, 876. 25 32, 876. 25 2/01/90 60, 000. 00 4.600 32, 876. 25 92,B76.25 8/01/90 0.00 0.000 31, 496. 25 31, 496.25 2/01/91 65, 000. 00 4.900 31,496.25 96, 496. 25 8/01/91 0.00 0.000 29, 903. 75 29, 903. 75 2/01/92 65, 000. 00 5.100 29, 903. 75 94,903.75 8/01/92 0.00 0.000 28,246.25 2B,246.25 2/01/93 70, 000. 00 5.300 28, 246. 25 98, 246. 25 8/01/93 0.00 0.000 26, 391. 25 26,391.25 2/01/94 75, 000. 00 5.500 26, 391.25 101, 391.25 8!01/94 0.0141 0. 000 24, 326. 75 24, 328. 75 2/01/95 75, 000. 00 5.750 24,328.75 99, 328. 75 8/01/95 0.00 0.000 22, 172. 50 22, 172. 50 2/01/96 80, 000. 00 6.000 22, 172. 50 102, 172. 50 8/01/96 0.00 0.000 19, 772. 50 19, 772. 50 2/01/97 85, 000. 00 6.200 19, 772. 50 104, 772. 50 8/01/97 0.00 0.000 17, 137. 50 17, 137.50 2/01/98 921, 000. 00 6.400 17, 137. 50 107, 137. 50 8/01/96 0.00 0.000 14,257.50 14, 257.50 2/01/99 95, 000. 00 6.500 14, 257. 50 109. 257. 50 8/01/9.9 0.014) 0.000 11, 170.00 11, 170.00 2/01/00 105, 000. 00 6.600 11, 170. 00 116, 170. 00 8/01/00 0.00 0. 000 7,705.00 7,705.00 2/01/01 110, 000. 00 6.700 7,705.00 117. 705. 00 8/01/01 0.00 0.000 4,020.00 4,020.00 2/01/02 120, 000. 00 6.700 4, 020. 00 124, 020. 00 TOTALS 1, 150, 000. 00 641, 131. 25 1,791,131.25 Accrued Interest tc. 8/01/87 = 0.00 Total Bond Years = 10250. Grass Interest Cast = $ 641,131.25 Average Coupon 6.2255% NIC = 6.255% Average Life = 8.91 Years Discount @ 100.000 0.00 File: fi.dbt Prepared by MILLER R SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 4/02/87 /9 ��.^1.>:s-•''37�. mac.,?d'-;Y'S^5r E"u,�i�k.iY r ..ts t:,w:.i � ir;yc,�-+'� $1.150.000 G.O. Fire Station Bonds of 1987 City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Debt Service Schedule Issue Date: 8/01/87 Settlement Date: 8/01/87 First Coupon: 2/01/B8 Estimated Date Principal Coupon Interest Debt Set -vice 2/01/8B 0.00 0.000 36, 168.75 36,1E3.75 8/01/88 0.00 0.000 36, 168.75 36, 168.75 2/01/89 35, 000. 00 4.300 36, 168.75 71, 168. 75 8/01/89 0.00 0.000 35,416.25 35,416.25 2/01/90 35, 000. 00 4.600 35,416.25 70, 416. 25 8/01/90 0.00 0. 000 34, 611.25 34, 611. 25 2/01/91 40, 000. 00 4.900 34, 611.25 74, 611.25 8/01/91 0.00 0.000 33, 631.25 33, 631.25 2/01/92 40, 000. 00 5.100 33, 631.25 73, 631.25 8/01/92 0. 00 0.000 329611.25 32,611.25 2/01/93 40, 000. 00 5.300 32, 611.25 72, 611.25 8/01/93 0.00 0.000 31, 551.25 31, 551.25 2/01/94 45, 000. 00 5.500 31, 551.25 76, 551.25 8/01/94 0.00 0.000 30, 313. 75 30, 313. 75 2/01/93 45, 000.00 5.750 30,313.75 75, 313. 75 8/01/95 0.00 0.000 29, 020.00 29, 020. 00 2/01/96 50, 000.00 6.000 29, 020. 00 79.020.00 8/01/96 0.00 0.000 27, 520. 00 27, 520. 00 2/01/97 55, 000. 00 6.200 27, 520. 00 82,520.00 8/01/97 0.00 0.000 25,815.00 25, 815. 00 2/01/98 55, 000. 00 6.400 25, 815. 00 80, 815. 00 8/01/98 0. 00 0.000 c4, 055. 00 E4, 055. 00 2/01/99 60, 01-1)0. 00 6.500 24, 055. 00 84, 055. 00 8/01/99 0.00 0. 000 22, 105. 00 22, 105. 00 2/01/00 65, 000. 00 6.600 22,105.00 87, 105. 00 8/01/00 0.00 0. 000 19, 960. 00 19, 960. 00 2/01/01 70, 000. 00 6.700 19, 960. 00 89, 960. 00 8/01/01 0.00 0.000 17, 615. 00 17, 615. 00 2/01/02 75, 000. 00 6. 700 17, 615. 014) 92, 615. 00 8/01/02 0.00 0.000 15, 102. 50 15, 102. 50 2/01/03 75, 000. 00 6.800 15, 102. 50 90, 102,. 50 3/01/03 0.00 0.000 12, 552. 50 12, 55-2. 50 2/01/04 80, 000. 00 6.800 1'2, 552. 50 92, 552. 50 81clI/04 0.00 0.000 9,a32.50 9, 532. 50 2/01/05 909 000. 00 6.900 9, 832. 50 99, 832. 50 8/01/05 0. 00 0.000 6,727.50 6,727.50 2/01/06 95, 000. 00 6.900 6, 727. 50 101, 727. 50 8/01/06 0.00 0.000 3, 450. 00 3,450.00 2/01/07 ------------------------------------------------------------------ 100, 000. 00 6.900 3,450.00 103, 450. 00 TOTALS 1, 150, 000. 00 932, 286. 25 2,082,286.25 Accrued Interest to 8/01/87 = 0.00 Tc,tal Bond Years = 14135. Gross Interest Cost = $ 9:;'._,'286.25 Average Coupon 6.596% NIC = F. 596% Average Life = 12. 29 Years Discount @ 100.000 0.00 File: f3.dbt Prepared by MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 4/02/87 �b $1,800,000 G.O. Fire Station Bands of 1987 City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Debt Service Schedule Issue Date: 8/01/87 Settlement Date: 8/01/87 First Coupon: 2/01/88 Est imat ed Date principal Coupon Interest Debt Service 2/01/88 0.00 0.000 53,:_70.00 53,270.00 8/01/88 0.00 1-11.00141 53, 270. 00 5-3,270.00 2/01/89 '30,000.00 4.300 53,270.00 143, 270. 00 8/01/89 0.00 0. u}QJ0 51, 335. 00 51, 335. 00 /01/90 95, 000.00 4.600 51, 335. 00 146. 335. 00 8/01/90 0.00 0.000 49, 150. 00 49, 150. 00 2/01/91 100, 000. 00 4.900 49, 150. 00 149, 150. 00 8/01/91 0.00 0.000 46, 700. 00 46, 700. 00 2/01/92 100, 000. 00 5.100 46, 700. 00 146, 700. 00 8/01/92 0.00 0.000 44, 150.00 44, 150.00 2/01/93 110, 00k1. 00 5.300 44, 150. 00 154, 150. 00 8/01/93 0.00 0.000 41, 235.00 41,235.00 2/01/94 115, 000. 00 5.500 41, 235. 00 156, 235. 00 8/01194 0. 00 0.000 38, 072. 50 3" 072. 50 2/01/95 120, 000. 00 5.750 38, 072. 50 158, 072. 50 8/01/95 0.00 0.000 34.622.50 3.4.622.50 2/01/96 1259 000. 00 6.000 155, 622. 50 8101196 0.00 0.000 30, 872. 50 30, 872. 50 2/01/97 135, 000. 00 6.200 30,872.50 165. 872. 5u'1 8/01/97 0.00 0.000 26, 687. 50 26, 687. 50 2/01/98 145, 000. 00 6.400 26, 687. 50 171, 687. 50 8/01/98 0.00 0. 000 22. 047. 50 22, 047. 50 2/01/99 150, 000. 00 6.500 22, 047. 50 172, 047. 50 8/01/99 0.00 0.000 1.7, 172.50 17, 172.50 2/01/00 160, 000. 00 6.600 17, 172. 50 177, 172. 50 8/01/00 0. 00 0.000 11,892.50 11,892.50 2/01/01 170, 000. 00 6.700 11, 892. 50 181, 892. 50 8/01/01 0.00 0.000 6,197.50 6,197.50 2/01/02 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 185, 000.00 6.700 6,197.50 191, 197.50 TOTALS 1, 800, 0021. 00 1, 000, 080. 00 2, 800. 080. 00 Accrued Interest to 8/01/87 = 0.00 Total Bond Years = 15995. Br. s Interest Cost = $ 1, 000, 080. 00 Average Coupon 6.232% NIC = 6.25'2-/. Average Life = 8.89 Years Discount @ 100.000 0.00 File: f2.dbt Prepared by MILLER R SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 4/02:/87 Issue Date: Settlement Date: First Coupon: $1,800,000 G.O. Fire Station Bonds of 1987 City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Debt Service Schedule 8/01/87 8/01/87 2/01/88 Interest to 8/01/87 = Total Bond Years = Grass Interest Cost = b Average Coupon NIC = Average Life = Discount C@ 100.000 0.00 22065. 1, 454, 623. 75 6.592% 6.592% 12.26 Years 0.00 File: f4. dbt Prepared by MILLER K SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 4/02/87 z7- Estimated Principal --------- Coupon ------ Interest -------- Debt Service ------------ --------- 0. 00 ------ 0.000 -------- 56, 571.25 ------------ 56, 571.25 0.00 0.000 56, 571.25 56, 571.25 55, 000. 00 4.300 56, 571.25 111, 571.25 0.00 -0.000 55, 388. 75 55, 388. 75 55, 000. 00 4.600 55, 388. 75 110, 388. 75 0.00 0.000 54, 123. 75 54, 123. 75 60, 000. 00 4.900 54, 123. 75 114, 123. 75 0.00 0.000 52, 653. 75 52, 653. 75 65, 000. 00 5.100 52, 653. 75 117, 653. 75 0.00 0.000 50, 996. 25 50, 996. 25 65, 000.00 5.300 50, 996. 25 115, 996. 25 0.00 0.000 49, 273. 75 49, 273. 75 70, 000.00 5.500 49, 273. 75 119, 273. 75 0.00 0.000 47, 348. 75 47, 348. 75 75, 000. 00 5.750 47, 348. 75 122, 348. 75 0.00 0.000 45, 192. 50 45, 192. 50 80, 000.00 6.000 45, 192. 50 125, 192. 50 0.00 .0. 000 42, 792. 50 42, 792.50 85, 000. 00 6.200 42, 792. 50 127, 792. 50 0.00 0.000 40, 157. 50 40, 157.50 85, 000. 00 6.400 40, 157. 50 125, 157.50 0.00 0.1000 37, 437. 50 37, 437.50 95, 000. 00 6.500 37, 437. 50 132, 437. 50 0.00 0.000 34, 350. 00 34, 350. 00 100, 000. 00 6.600 34, 350. 00 134, 350. 00 0.00 0.000 31, 050. 00 31, 050. 00 105, 000. 00 6.700 --1,050.00 136, 050.00 0.00 0.000 27,532.50 27, 532. 50 i 15, 000. 00 6.700 27, 532. 50 142, 532. 50 0.00 0.000 23, 680. 00 23, 680. 00 120, 000. 00 6.800 23, 680. 00 143, 680. 00 0.00 0.000 19, 600. 00 19, 600. 00 130, 000. 00 6.800 19, 600. 00 149, 600. 00 0.00 0.000 15, 180. 00 15, 180. 00 140, 000. 00 6.900 15, 180. 00 155, 180. 00 0.00 0.000 10, 350. 00 10, 050. 00 145, 000. 00 6.900 10, 350. 00 155, 350. 00 0.00 0.000 5,347.50 5,347.50 155, 000. 00 ------------------------------------------------------- 6.900 5,347.50 160, 347. 50 ------------------------------------------------------- 1, 800, 000. 00 1, 454, 623.75 3,254,623.75 Interest to 8/01/87 = Total Bond Years = Grass Interest Cost = b Average Coupon NIC = Average Life = Discount C@ 100.000 0.00 22065. 1, 454, 623. 75 6.592% 6.592% 12.26 Years 0.00 File: f4. dbt Prepared by MILLER K SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 4/02/87 z7- Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Five There are twelve (12) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of these items in further detail, the items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. Personnel Items -- Item 1. Engineering Technician --A new Engineering Technician position was approved in the 1987 budget. This position was advertised and approximately 35 applications were received. After screening of these applications, ten applicants were invited to the Eagan Municipal Center for a written engineering technology test. From the results of this testing, the four top scoring applicants were invited to the Municipal Center for an interview with Assistant City Engineer Foertsch, Senior Engineering Tech/Supervisor Kirsch and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Gordon Stauff be hired to fill the new position, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Gordon Stauff as an Engineering Technician, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. Item 2. Engineering Intern/Technician Assistant -- After notification of the engineering schools at local colleges and universities, three applications to serve an internship with the City of Eagan engineering department were received. The three applicants were interviewed by Assistant City Engineer Foertsch and Senior Engineering Tech/Supervisor Kirsch and it is their recommendation that Catherine Meuwissen be hired for the temporary six month internship. As a point of information for the members of the City Council, Jill Pennie, who began an engineering internship in 1986 and returned to school during the year, will return to complete her internship beginning in June. Provision is made for both these positions in the 1987 budget. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Catherine Meuwissen for a temporary, six month internship in the City of Eagan engineering department. Item 3. Municipal Center Receptionist (Two Positions) -- Approximately 65 applications were. received for these positions. After screening of the applications, 22 candidates were invited to the Eagan Municipal Center for a written test and a preliminary interview with Administrative Assistant Witt and Administrative Assistant Duffy. From the results of the written test and the interview, eight applicants were invited to return to the Municipal Center for a practical test operating the switchboard with Administrative Assistant Duffy and a final interview with Director of Finance VanOverbeke, Administrative Assistant Witt and Head Cashier Krech. It is the consensus recommendation of all concerned in the process that Enda Asl son and Denice Muccio Grout be hired to Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Six PERSONNEL ITEMS CONTINUED: fill the two positions, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Enda Asleson and Denice Muccio Grout as receptionists at the Municipal Center, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. Item 4. Part -Time Police Dispatcher -- The City has posted and advertised an opening for a part time police dispatcher. During the time allowed for applications, a current employee of the Police Department, Marlene Adam, requested to be considered for that part- time position. Ms. Adam is currently the Records Technician with additional dispatch duties (full-time). It is the policy of the City of Eagan that when a vacancy occurs in a dispatch position, another dispatcher may request the opening with a new time (i.e., full to part-time, part to full-time). Therefore it is the recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe, Office Manager Knight and Administrative Assistant Duffy that Marlene Adam be transferred to the part-time Police Dispatcher opening. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the transfer of Marlene Adam to the open part-time Police Dispatcher position. Item S. Police Records Technician -- The transfer of Marlene Adam to part-time Police Dispatcher, if approved by Council action, will leave vacant the Records Technician position in the Police Department. This reorganized position was recently approved by Council action to eliminate dispatching duties. Authorization is needed to advertise the newly created vacancy. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the advertisement of the vacancy for a Records Technician in the Police Department. Item 6. Maintenance Facility Secretary -- A new secretary position for the Maintenance Facility was approved in the 1987 budget. Approximately 58 applications were received for this position. After screening of the applications, twenty-two applicants were invited to come to the Eagan Municipal Center for a written and a typing test. From the results of these tests, ten applicants were invited to the Municipal Center for an interview with Superintendent of Utilities and Buildings Connolly, Superintendent of Streets and Equipment Erhart, Superintendent of Parks and Forestry VonDeLinde and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Nancy Bailey be hired to fill this newly created position, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. v Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Seven PERSONNEL ITEMS CONTINUED: ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Nancy Bailey as the Maintenance Facility Secretary, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. Item 7. Seasonal Park Maintenance Worker -- It is the recommendation of Park Superintendent VonDeLinde that Dave Wills be hired as a temporary seasonal park maintenance worker. Mr. Wills was a seasonal park maintenance worker with the City last summer. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Dave Wills as a temporary seasonal park maintenance worker. Item 8. Utility Maintenance Worker -- A new Utility Maintenance Worker position was approved in the 1987 budget. Approximately 48 applications were received for this position. After screening the applications, twelve applicants were invited to the Eagan Municipal Center for a written test. From these test results, six applicants were invited back for an interview with Superintendent of Utilities Connolly, Utilities Supervisor Heur and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Robert Zwiener be hired to fill the position, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Robert Zwiener as a Utility Maintenance Worker, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. 7, 1T Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eight PLUMBERS LICENSES B. Plumbers Licenses --Enclosed on page is a copy of the plumber licenses that are in order for consider tion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of plumbers licenses as presented. PLUMBING LICENSES APRIL 7, 1987 1. A.A.A. Abbott 2. A.A.A. Co-op 3. Robert B. Hill Company 4. John Hiltner Plumbing 5. Janecky Plumbing 6. Jenniges Plumbing & Heating 7. Northrup Mechical Inc. 8. Olberg Construction 9. Plymouth Plumbing, Inc. 10. Quality Rooter Plumbing 11. Regency Plumbing 12. Scherer Plumbing 13. Tom Tix Plumbing & Heating Z7 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Nine NEW MANAGER FOR LA FONDA'S C. New Manager (Liquor License) LaFonda's Restaurant --The City has received and processed an application from Randy Paul Ringsby, the new manager of La Fonda's Restaurant. City Code specifies that a "resident manager must take full responsibility for conduct of the licensed premises and be a person who could qualify individually as a licensee." Mr. Ringsby has paid the appropriate fees and successfully passed the Eagan Police Department investigation. A copy of his information form is attached without page number for City Council review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Randy Paul Ringsby as manager of La Fonda's for purposes of issuance of a liquor license to that restaurant establishment. RESOLUTION REGRADING COMMERCIAL RECYCLING D. Resolution Regarding Commercial Recycling --As a result of the March 11, 1987 Solid Waste Abatement Commission meeting, a recom- mendation is being forwarded to the City Council to consider a resolution concerning commercial recycling. The purpose of the resolution is to encourage Eagan businesses to take advantage of private sector recyclers able to provide office paper and corrugated cardboard recycling. The City of Eagan is currently participating in the recycling of office paper and corrugated cardboard and by the passage of this resolution would make local business aware of the commercial recycling potential in hopes that they would contact a recycling firm and participate in a commercial recycling effort. This resolution supports the short-term strategy of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission and City Council to comply with the recycling mandate. For a copy of the resolution and support information, refer to pages through SIL. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution allowing Eagan businesses to take advantage of private sector recyclers able to provide office paper and corrugated cardboard recycling as presented. 2F CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION CONCERNING COMMERCIAL RECYCLING WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has adopted the Minnesota Waste Management Act, Minnesota Statute 473.803, -to encourage the abatement of the landfill disposal of certain recyclable and recoverable wastes and has established a mandate that no unprocessed solid waste may be landfilled after 1990; and, WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has adopted policy guidelines' to encourage the implementation of the Act, recognizing within such guidelines the need to remove high grade office paper and corrugated materials from the commercial wastestream; and, . WHEREAS, the City of Eagan, through its Solid Waste Abatement Commission, has defined office paper and corrugated material recycling as a Positive alternative to landfill disposal; and, WHEREAS, the cost of landfill disposal is increasing substantially as the 1990 deadline for landfill abatement approaches and cost-effective alternatives to such disposal are available through various vendors throughout the metropolitan area; and, WHEREAS, the Eagan City Council supports the role of free enter- prise in the management of social issues and the mitigation of regional challenges, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan encourage its business community to undertake individual assessments of its means of solid waste disposal and the presence of recyclable and recoverable materials in its wastestream. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City shall make available, through the local media and otherwise, a list of metropolitan area firms which provide office paper and corrugated recycling services to facilitate commercial recycling in the City of Eagan. Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk CERTIFICATION I, E. J. VanO verbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1987. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan Z�J MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN DATE: MARCH 18, 1987 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION CONCERNING COMMERCIAL RECYCLING At ,its meeting on Wednesday, March 11, 1987, the Eagan Solid Waste Abatement Commission recommended for consideration to the City Council the attached resolution concerning commercial recycling. The purpose of the resolution is to encourage Eagan businesses to take advantage of private sectorrecyclers able to provide office paper and corrugated cardboard recycling. While the Commission is not in a position to provide its final report, it believes that the publication of information pertinent to commercial recycling and the availability of a list of private sector recyclers can be compatible with any program which it may eventually recommend. It is the intention of staff to publicize the availability of the commercial recycler list through the City newsletter and by press release to the local newspapers. It would then be the function of staff to act merely as an information channel and not to promote a particular vendor over any other. In summary, the Solid Waste Abatement Commission would request action approving or denying the resolution concerning commercial recycling and thereby directing staff to undertake publicity concerning available vendors. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me. The Commission would appreciate it going to the Council at the next available meeting. Adm'"istrative Assistant JDH/jeh 3a OFFICE PAPER RECYCLING FIRMS Certain -Teed Building Products Valley Industrial Park Shakopee, MN 55379 (612) 445-6450 Materials accepted: High-grade office paper and corrugated containers. Bulk loads of 1000 pounds or more preferred. Data Fiber Products Corp 201 Girard Ave Minneapolis, MN 55405 (612) 377-0886 Redemption center for commercial/industrial generators. Materials accepted: High-grade office paper, corrugated containers, IBM cards. Haselberger Associates 392 W County Rd B New Brighton, MN 55113 (612) 636-9452 Materials accepted: Office paper, computer paper, books Metro Paper Recovery 965 Eustis Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612) 332-3501 Materials accepted: All types of paper from commercial sources. Large tonnages preferred. Office Paper Pick -Up Inc. 860 Moore Lake Dr Fridley, MN 55432 (612) 571-3596 Will pick up computer paper, office paper and file folders. Pioneer Paper Stock 155 Irving Ave N Minneapolis, MN 55405 (612) 374-2280 Materials accepted: All types of paper including colored, corrugated, printers' waste paper, office paper. Keep individual grades separate. 13 / OFFICE PAPER RECYCLING FIRMS PAGE TWO Recycling Services P 0 Box 409 Minneapolis, MN 55411 (612) 522-6558 Drop-off and redemption center for commercial -industrial generators. Materials accepted: High-grade paper, computer printouts, IBM cards, printers' waste paper. Will not accept newspapers, magazines, phone books. Rohn Industries P 0 Box 464 Minneapolis, MN 55440 (612) 593-5458 (612) 333-4748 Materials accepted: High-grade office paper, computer paper, baled cardboard. Confidential document destruction. Will not accept loose cardboard or newspaper. Steve's Cardboard Salvage 381 York Ave St Paul, MN 55101 (612) 774-0984 Will pick up corrugated cardboard containers. Waldorf Corporation 2200 Myrtle Ave St Paul, MN 55164 (6 12) 641-4248 (612) 641-4675 Materials accepted: Corrugated, newspapers, office and computer paper, printers' waste paper, newsprint and many other types of paper. 37.-- Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Ten VACATE EASEMENT, RECEIVE PETITION ORDER PUBLIC HEARING NORWEST 2ND ADDITION E. Vacate Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Norwest 2nd Addition) --We have received a request from the property owner of Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 2nd Addition, to vacate an existing drainage and utility easement for the existing sanitary sewer service to the bank facility in the northeast corner of Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob Roads. All application materials have been submitted as required for proceeding with the public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the petition to vacate the utility easement for Norwest 2nd Addition and schedule a public hearing to be held May 5, 1987. 33 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eleven APPROVE FINAL PLAT, FAIRWAY HILLS F. Approve Final Plat, Fairway Hills --We have received a request for final plat approval for the Fairway Hills first phase development located on the SE corner of Pilot Knob Road and Cliff Road as indicated by the final plat map enclosed on page All conditions of the preliminary plat approval, granted y Council action on May 6, 1986 have been satisfactorily resolved. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Fairway Hills and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 3�z 8 i = x a x 1..j s =W I 3Ell _ 1 V tiZ � Zy an O p • o c. 0 S �iS• I �'-s''-`'• \ ; � iii` ' ` � c N , 0 i G ��� I'} a •_:tt} / 1 .tea ,,' \ h I °I^TI i S r ti, as SB/ � -- - ...� CTS �°C , /' ;/, d//• \'"> `< a//,° o\' �- 'p' I'; Cr fill c mI •vv _ :%Li ` / ;' w/w w ,f`.. "' y �' _ i 'LI o `_��., ice`; '� ¢ :; C, 477 3 '�' =- --- a lea = = r.,......'�• � i �. M +':• ... i - � ;'r .'r%/ .I!/% `\ � �� -alas �r �- - .1 �' es e♦r ? .�I . c,. -I -_ -.•z- �` ,-:r.= v �.Idyvi`• `' 4 - _j_ ,° qty:'_ :. :r'C_'•`•.$ I ♦Jy t.ar,• M ' I I . -av m �.. - --. � f �.°' y it;� •.I •- �+q Lie, �!I v r � I. _ �� .) oNM y '$"(JTn� �mr�3f� a I� �, : r^,. `H'"\rC ' • r �ti ci ^ L .F wrr- *3a 1;'.,.V 1$ of A- S� . .... L.�y w'.T` I �l•..'. ari—.♦. _.I c r'� 1. /1 L [ P059/ a�a z" .t Nj •k•, _ ;^ s-'�- ,la,' �'/. ter. _�L., -'I- - -�I - -- —=�^ "o I� —. - -- JAI191 sa.. wr zE ON 14V"57 3 _LO,Yr .6I S 'iN 'H 7 5 a •1♦ 1 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twelve PROJECT 499, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT G. Project 499, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Chapel Hill Baptist Church) --The staff has received a petition from the developers of the Chapel Hill Baptist Church requesting the preparation of a feasibility report and detail plans and specifications for the installation of streets and storm sewer to service that proposed development. With all costs being guaranteed, it would be appropriate for the Council to receive this petition and order the requested work. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 499 (Chapel Hill Baptist Church) and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report, plans and specifications. PROJECT 500, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT H. Project 500, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Briar Oaks of Apple Valley) --We have received a petition from the develpers of the Briar Oaks of Apple Valley development just south of the Safari resevoir. This petition requests the installation and extension of trunk sanitary sewer facilities to service that development. This is in compliance with the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan and the Joint Powers Agreement recently executed between Eagan and Apple Valley. With all costs being guaranteed by the petitioner, it would appropriate for the Council to order the requested report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the petition for Project 500 (Briar Oaks of Apple Valley) and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report. 3� Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen PROJECT 501, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT (EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARR 8TH ADDITION) I. Project 501, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition) --The staff has received a petition from the developers of the above referenced subdivision to install a water main loop necessary to provide service. With all costs being guaranteed in the petition, it is recommended that the Council authorize the requested feasibility report, plans and specifications. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 501 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition - water main) and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report, plans and specifications. FINAL PLAT, LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION J. Final Plat, Lexington Square 6th Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Lexington Square 6th Addition located north of and adjacent to Northview Park Road. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval by Council action on March 22, 1984 have been resolved and all requirements of the final plat application process have been satisfactorily complied with. The copy of the proposed final plat is provided on page -3,. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Lexington Square 6th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all required documents. 37 ....r�•.,w..,.V..• tea• •V.,_w "�Yi��i' �� I nil i I +• �n t lox, 4NNbA I Ip f i s E 3 i8 a 41; I %� sit a •i a i A =r ;�--EZ- EllNIQ ssrt= •� �i I -ss Ts s �, 3j !8'otai'8'. J 1-as_r.or R 6Y. ii esiti g i I • I � s >e; I j _- s o r ES gig r` • 7 + 1 _ =j C _: �$�,srP�; ti i� (�� e5�io��.isre:.�s � •;Si li�-���vx.J o E� fi�=: � :�;3�ia�s�aiss n, •.�6 ai- �'�_stm�, � t3 fi��+?�=:s"s=�s�•4st-�:.s s; �: � ovr!-, '-:9is:e]aE.:;a3:Y jcs3 a ,,,t��,� yb• fs N��e xey°"��=t?��i��.$��4�ir �]aa' �•`.r?,.. �•,8 / ]y s��. _ate"t'��_-$�rt�' ih:•aw+ i�y:n5sis, _•pill iEssS 1 •Y� Y . 5 Y ffiiE..a 'i � ��■ � ��� aEeYEy�sxY�y�'i'.3':rci• �rsFci 4:3 if iygaag 3 z a i l i I f if F �i E� �y Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen FINAL PLAT, BURR OAR HILLS ADDITION K. Final Plat, Burr Oak Hills Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the first phase of the Burr Oak Hills Addition located adjace t to Inver Grove Heights and south of T.H. 55. Enclosed on page 7is a copy of the proposed final plat. All conditions placed n the preliminary plat approval by Council action on April 15, 1986 have been resolved. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Burr Oak Hills Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all required documents. 3j X LU cn 747-- A. I. Re 'os .9 1. cc: 1.0 t Za'aft fn ai tN dr N., ej ro-s. -TiCco ti - CD 4" IL r O' J., 4p A -7kZ- cu r Amt. -i uj w -ft to -0- i It 'ZAr-V" all.'a IQ, �41 tcn 9 7 ro L .i.;Q. W. Co L r'to IC S 9, 47 T. -Wxm ru 'tco 0 CJ A g. All 7, C[ .-UW- cult..m •1;., 1 Dos koe "fi,'3; I crn) .. ........ aft '— "I ir '00 16 .. .......... Ncu 0 vk M* Cd cc nom. cn 747-- A. I. Re 'os .9 1. cc: 1.0 t Za'aft fn ai tN dr N., ej ro-s. -TiCco ti - CD 4" IL r O' J., 4p A -7kZ- cu r Amt. -i uj w -ft to -0- i It 'ZAr-V" all.'a IQ, �41 tcn 9 7 ro L .i.;Q. W. Co L r'to IC S 9, 47 T. -Wxm ru 'tco 0 CJ A g. All 7, C[ .-UW- cult..m •1;., 1 Dos koe "fi,'3; I crn) .. ........ aft '— "I ir '00 16 .. .......... Ncu 0 vk M* H —IriCN LIE '6' — --� ' 325.16 N69 51'40'E I i o ,�.._ ��•r, L rw P rl 1 - r a I � i I ;. '+�� i, o• 4 �r�j 337.59 IN8951'90•E! ZI gy; a0UTLOT Ag .\1 -W r -,,Z H- t a /w fi'�'Y W� 5 R W Nii��r -i rw.'e:o�i �T C'iNri: ��'� -.Y_rL L J�llw J I 1 iii+ C Je Y r •L J L'_ _a J L _� _ L �. 1a _ arY �i I 1J2a 6B NN9 36'12-L iwlw llr I rw�w n Nri I r r/a r r/w Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen RESOLUTION REQUESTING MNDOT SPEED STUDY/AUTHORIZATION (MISCELLANEOUS STREETS) L. Resolution Requesting MnDOT Speed Study/Authorization (Miscellaneous Streets --With the continued expansion and growth within the City of Eagan, several new streets are being constructed requiring speed limit designations to be established by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to ensure legal enforcement of the appropriate speeds. In order to get the speed limit established by MnDOT, it is necessary to request a formal sp ed study to be performed by their personnel. Enclosed on pages _ and __ is a copy of the requesting resolution and the h attaced lis_tinc_R streets to be included in MnDOT's study. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution requesting MnDOT to perform a speed study for speed limit designation on miscellaneous streets and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN SPEED LIMIT DESIGNATION MnDOT SPEED STUDY REQUEST WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has recently constructed or upgraded several streets within the community; and, WHEREAS, the City would like to establish enforceable speed limits along those local streets referenced on the -attached Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council, the City of Eagan, Dakota County, hereby request MnDOT District 9 to perform all required speed studies necessary to designate the proper speed limit for those streets referenced in the attached Exhibit A. Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: CERTIFICATION Its Clerk I, E.J. V anOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1986. E.J. VanOverbeke, City Cler AL3 April 7, 1987 EXHIBIT A TO APRIL 7, 1987, RESOLUTION REQUESTING MNDOT SPEED STUDY FOR SPEED LIMIT MAP SECT. STREET FROM TO 22 Denmark Ave Wescott Rd Deerwood Dr 15 Town Center Dr Duckwood Dr Lexington Ave 16&17 Ashbury Rd Blackhawk Hills Rd Blue Cross Rd 1&2 Lone Oak Pkwy O'Neill Dr TH 149 1&2 Northwest Pkwy TH 14 Lone Oak Pkwy 0 30 mph 30 mph 30 mph 35 mph 35 mph Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/BLACKHAWK PLAZA A. Conditional Use Permit to Allow Gas Pumps and Service Bays on Separate Lots in Blackhawk Plaza --At the March 17 City Council meeting, a conditional use permit was considered to allow gas pumps and service bays on separate lots at the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center. The APC held a public hearing on February 26 and considered an application submitted by the owner of the Blackhawk Plaza facility requesting a conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in an NB district and for the separation of pumps and service bays. The APC's recommendation is denial on the conditional use permit application. There were several neighbors present who raised questions regarding the status of landscaping and other issues pertaining to the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center. The specific concern raised by the abutting neighborhood was the landscaping proposed for the north side of the shopping center that would reduce the visual impact the shopping center creates for the neighborhood. Since the landscaping has not occurred, the staff was directed to review the landscaping plan and provide an update at the April 7 City Council meeting. The Director of Public Works was asked to prepare a cross-section or profile that illustrates the visual impact of the shopping center once the landscaping is completed according to the landscape plan. The Planning Department has reviewed all conditions and for a report on he ,5onditions, please refer to a memo as attached on page(s) _ (p -,F 7 7 A copy of the cross-section map and a location map prepared by the Engineering Department, are enclosed on page3 419-40 for your review. f For additional information regarding the conditional use permit application as presented to t APC, refer to the staff report enclosed on pages through. Correspondence was received from Peter Stalland specifically addressing the issue of gas pumps and service bays for Blackhawk Plaza. Enclosed on pages _T15 through is a copy of his letter. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit to allow gas pumps and service bays on separate lots for the Blackhawk Plaza neighborhood shopping center. Special Note: The City Attorney and City Administrator are recommending that this item be continued until the April 21 City Council meeting to allow evaluation of the Peter Stalland letter and further address all the issues raised by the surrounding neighborhood. MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: APRIL 2, 1987 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON BLACKHAWK PLAZA CONDITIONAL USE REPORT At the March 17, 1987, City Council meeting, the City Council requested the Planning Department to review the present status of the Blackhawk Plaza Development. The Preliminary Plat was approved June 4, 1985, subject to 18 conditions of approval placed by the Eagan City Council. It appears that most of these 18 conditions have been fulfilled with the granting of the final plat for the first phase. The only conditions which have not been complied with at this time are the following: 3. No building permit shall be allowed for Lot 8 until the Planning Commission/City Council have reviewed and approved the layout with the understanding there will be no variances for building permits on that lot. It appears the ponding area has been changed and approved in regard to the final plat and that this condition would no longer be applicable. 7. A detailed landscape plan has been submitted and reviewed by City staff. Attached is a portion of the landscape plan pertaining to the area to the west and north showing the detail of plant materials being proposed. This does exceed the requirements the City has in regard to the landscaping policy. 9. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be concealed by a parapet wall or suitable screening. At this time, staff does not know if this has been complied with but is pointing out that additional screening for the rooftop should be considered in the building design. It is Planning Department's understanding that Engineering is preparing cross sections and will be able to discuss the grade and elevation issues of the building as it relates to Blackhawk Road and property to the north. City Planner DCR/jj Attachment NY To Fsie nLrITEP A -T I3ax OF "IMINCI AREA To 1$E t;;FFP <D w/ #10 HKII-WAY mD M I P_ LANTING SCHEDULE CODE QTY. COMMON NAME/LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS A �� C LT17 o�ulp�nTAl.17 CAL IERT LBAP- B . i� Furls?IRE WriPEM z' z" 11LIA roFwTA'GRE SPIRE' CAL. LI:APEiL C —pca CaI�uCA PE1'1,�TA '_ HToizM -. -..4.�. YIGEA GU►uCA DENSATII — - T Gcx CAGO SLvE gPIz�CE _._.r ... �. _ . FOW F _ G �p2 1-' 70 �._n•G. -- H - 52 ELh1Y_�bK1fp_�LJcroD 9' t Gomer, _LatytEERK I'LL KEL` F -Y_ NT_-_ Alc lt'i'f i4V: Fob'. �z----._-. - DELP59-M c- K L �b PAARF_Pt"It�F 3' . vI PowA F -F_ I Iu oPorEAK CRAM> M€ Y _�T_:. NT T - ►Z 1 N 12 ��vvvI_S V zps9'^ ` W� ;�•• ,SO2dy-�, 6% Tn�l n ' .,, ` 4 or 95 71 103 71 so ON- V :ool 8489 BB 99 8899 .125.09 � n, � 8°j � /z9 03 � / 'royrn. aaw re � �= 489it135 m 42 rvf r Ir`aa n.�a . esSs e�_c _•zs c-.._ < - LANE R 6 e h,. �•ae..r ,La„ x o. _ �� do• °.° II a;e E - 36 29gj2q g. e E � � a.m o y� � .9• 22 - - ya3V a 2• -_!40 69 - - m i120 0 ry S91°Sy';6 E 14162 Q. I NB99e SOW a so `o 37 CARNELIAN -° to pp p - 23 a. _ � 3 p W _ 1400 Q, Z N87'472( -W ° :Q --- .. - _ - --- 132_ i_ _ - 1487°4i2:"W- 36 p 24 - 0 9 oa� 4 -- City of l 128.76 - Eagan 010-77 - ;4 NB7°4, 2i W, S m _ a 23 a m p CN m 6� ° 125 0 N>O N i5jc ,Z 120 12490 _ i 34 iV N S.W N83305OW I - rry 140 0 p p 26 ^ S w_p : 33• w_ 7 0 6 ,0 1 so R - m 128 3° - 33 6e PAR K 44S j3 "07 59 r 3 / '� '.Psr' Sun •, ° r _ r '. • �. efaa �dw i.o oo•'c>3`aa'y 27 /mss HALITE ' dti 5w� `• j Gq p 020-77 .,b - : `a 9g9g 07701 92 3 65� •a �as .s '^:,�, ti W 3 JJ 32 P� 26 '•S/rj �. nr 29 p'•- 30 0^ 31 4 5 `- �Jo PO sw'• OUTLOT Ate✓ 0.O 96 2r 3 I \' • Y 5 \� 1700 Inn 35 r 158 0 76 G N'h EST EAST b S 89°38.56 . OJO-78 0 8863 \ IIS - 90. 90 9C 9C 95 = •' JJ' 040. + J aB' 44--^/•� W __ X030 ! ! � 2 $_ I 'y} _��s,�-- 4', 335 7 \ z. z a .� 10*P`-- BiE30w 6 90 9C �9C SB 723Y gg dr ; SOEv0 1 .vd'a . 4 R a v 2�•. a `^ °�•Z -1'% N B9°40'224. 46 r+ iJ2'!�' o^^ �E�— r 226. ' �';'/ M•. a WI KATFIRYN \ IRCLEO-'1 010-78 ; ; �• BIO\i 109 53 s5 N N.B9°4409r _60- 60 _ � �i,°/12 n ~ A/O n rte- 14 •: r 120 73 N 89°40,2 !I' „ 3 'm __ q a. o = O z P 3-.18C1b0o0 a i'/'L` S 78°1y O:"1 9 P, R-60 y 8 17 z 81 70.91 1r2 ° E o-� y,_.. +BBS ' 020 l o 0-78 plQ ♦ d o EF , ' ISO zl BO z 182 21 °a•2' ��,'^. \� I • - - - - N 89°40 22"W 473 68 I ( wE^° N 89`.0 030-79 - so c1r, I .. jT- ..1'+.... 11'1.1.: •1(.`. `: .r.': 1)1 �� GL _ __EAST 3375- --.-_- --1__ ��•._��•-.' _.-_ 'ria ' = 040lit- -79 �// ' B `L ------ p----} -� ti._ �• — ;`,�- " -� - wE ST :a `i ,• 4•a. 050 -79 - ms o �•�;•....��- ° n , 4 4 6.041 22- W/--..1Btvs _ -. `- N p `1 22- • ' 1� 070 79to pa c+ • c _ ; �•1 4 060 —79 EArAN TOWN CEYETERT p f _ I 010-80 Z ovm& 'e `. 9 2640 26 Ei CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: BLACKHAWR PLAZA INC., STEVE RAMSEY LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 20 EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 26, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the owner of the Blackhawk Plaza facility, requesting a conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in a N.B. (neighborhood business) district and for the separation of pumps and service bays. Tom Thumb will be the tenant located on the westernmost portion of Blackhawk Plaza along Blackhawk Road. This application does not include service bays, however, Lot 5 of this plat did receive a conditional use permit approval for a full service gas station as per Code r.e,quir.ements at the time of preliminary plat approval. Code does not allow the opening of such a facility until at least 10,000 square feet of retail space has had occupancy. In addition, the owner intends to provide auto related service facilities on Lot 7 near the cemetary along County Road 30. The City's Engineering Department has reviewed this plan and all auto turning radius' meet requirements. All-setbacks.meet Code requirements and only 3 parking stalls will be removed. If approved, this conditional use permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The canopy will not be used for additional signage. 2. The storage tanks shall be located entirely under the drive area so if they are replaced or repaired, the landscaping along Blackhawk Road will not be disturbed. 3. The canopy shall be no closer than 50 feet to the Blackhawk Road right-of-way. 4. All other applicable Code requirements shall be adhered to. r�- • L7riILLN RRA TOM THUMB 9]50 Sp FT. I tZIPROP05En GIL&MLO M717-1 I • I PROPOSED CONSOLE FpFI R6h` MINI AGEMENT'"OF SELF- SEI DISPENSERS WI INTERLOM TE 1 bLAN D _0 PROPOSCD CfaNOPY tU� EN611'v FFR w/ No .mer•• f31 P0.OPDSE.� Z" C ALV 0.1.11, t2� PllDYO SED 4L0 � 11�-0 KEINFDRLEO CDNC MS r '// ) % �. PROPQOEC ZH'-0 • 52.'-O CIPANOPV W i t'31 PROPOSED 2' GALVAUIZED YENT'� UNES TO \2' R1]ERS OU CANOPY COLUMN /—'SN?RfU?0SE0 3/4 FIP 5U$PUiJIPS �- f PRDFOSED OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS TANKS-� I■f 12112.000 GALLON . R'.O • 'Ste, -0 • \� U1 10.000 C+ALLON. 5'-0 * 30'-O ANO CONTAIN: �\ 11 G REGULAR REGULAR UNLENV O SUPER- UNLENO - C11 PROPOSED A, rILL rIrE% Vv/ DROP TUBFti 1 .� Y14DYUSE0 ZW-O •3D'•L+ •td' REINFOKLEL7 CONf_IIL--TE SLFPM' OVER TGNIK'S NOTE! uNvEr GROUND TANKS HAVE 2.'•C SEf ARNTION AND 3'-O DURY DEPTLI 7- _0 PROPOSCD CfaNOPY tU� EN611'v FFR w/ No .mer•• f31 P0.OPDSE.� Z" C ALV 0.1.11, t2� PllDYO SED 4L0 � 11�-0 KEINFDRLEO CDNC MS r '// ) % �. PROPQOEC ZH'-0 • 52.'-O CIPANOPV W i t'31 PROPOSED 2' GALVAUIZED YENT'� UNES TO \2' R1]ERS OU CANOPY COLUMN /—'SN?RfU?0SE0 3/4 FIP 5U$PUiJIPS �- f PRDFOSED OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS TANKS-� I■f 12112.000 GALLON . R'.O • 'Ste, -0 • \� U1 10.000 C+ALLON. 5'-0 * 30'-O ANO CONTAIN: �\ 11 G REGULAR REGULAR UNLENV O SUPER- UNLENO - C11 PROPOSED A, rILL rIrE% Vv/ DROP TUBFti 1 .� Y14DYUSE0 ZW-O •3D'•L+ •td' REINFOKLEL7 CONf_IIL--TE SLFPM' OVER TGNIK'S NOTE! uNvEr GROUND TANKS HAVE 2.'•C SEf ARNTION AND 3'-O DURY DEPTLI Ci i tip L 1 UJ Xv %.I a a Ci APC Minutes February 26, 1987 Kennebec and Seneca Roads intersection on Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park in the southwest quarter of Section 17. Mr. Runkle indicated that.the proposed sign met all ordinance requirements. There was no one from the public, however, the owner was present to respond to questions. Staff indicated that there were no other tenants in the building. Mr. Voracek was advised that future signs could meet the 300 foot spacing requirement on adjacent lots. Krisnik moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a 20 foot tall pylon sign with a signage area of approximately 104 square feet, subject to all applicable sign ordinances and a one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. All voted in favor. BLACKHAWK PLAZA - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The application of Blackhawk Plaza, Inc., Steve Ramsey, for a conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in a NB (Neighborhood Business) district, and for the separation of gas pumps and service bays in Blackhawk Plaza in the southeast quarter of Section 20, was the subject of the third public hearing convened by Mr. Harrison. City Planner Runkle introduced the proposal which was a request from Tom Thumb, a major anchor tenant on the western most portion of Blackhawk Plaza Center, to have gas pumps with a canopy, while the service bays would be located in a separate facility on a separate lot, with a separate owner near the cemetery along County Road #30. Mr. Chuck Carmichael, attorney for the applicant, was present. There was no one from the public. Mr. Krisnik questioned the validity of the proposed buffer to residents to the west in the single family homes and the location of the gas pumps and canopies so close to Blackhawk Road. Mr.. Voracek requested information regarding the location of R-1 residents relative to the proposed gas pumps and information as to any potential fire code violations. Mr. Runkle indicated that State Fire Marshall and City Fire Chief approval would be required. The applicant was reminded that under City Ordinance, service bays would have to be operational in order for gas pumps to be allowed. Mr. Carmichael pointed out that the shopping center itself was due to open very soon and that the car service center which would have the bays, is not yet being constructed. There was discussion regarding the berm between the Center and Blackhawk Road, which apparently could not exceed 3 feet in height, if even that high. It was indicated that the Tom Thumb lease was contingent upon obtaining gas pumps. Mr. Krisnik indicated concern in regard to the shielding of lighting from the gas pump canopy. Trygg moved to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and Chairman Hall seconded the motion in order to put the matter on the floor before the Commission. Trygg and Harrison voted yea; Gustafson and Krisnik voted nay; and Voracek abstained based on his belief that Tom Thumb was a client of his employer. Krisnik then moved to recommend denial of the conditional use permit, based upon: �r- APC Minutes February 26, 1987 1. The fact that the pumps would be provided without a direct tie to service bays as required under the ordinance. 2. That the service bays would be located too close to the cemetery area. 3. That the gas pumps and lighting were too close to the residential areas. Harrison seconded the motion to put the matter on the floor. Gustafson, Krisnik and Harrison voted yea; Trygg voted nay; and Voracek abstained. The motion passed. JAMES UNKER - WAIVER OF PLAT Chairman Harrison then called the public hearing in regard to the request for waiver of plat by James Unker for lot 10, Block 3, Cle arview Addition, in the southeast quarter of Section 29. Mr. Runkle introduced the application. Mr. Unker was present and requested that the matter be tabled to allow him to review the conditions proposed by City staff in regard to the request of lot split. There was significant discussion in regard to the large number of easements required to service the property. There was no one from the public to respond. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to continue the matter to the regular March APC meeting. All voted yes. DANBURY ADDITION - REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT & VARIANCE At 7:50 p.m., Mr. Harrison called the public hearing in regard to the application of Tri -Land Properties for rezoning from Agricultural to R-1 single family, and preliminary plat for Danbury Addition with a variance from R-1 requirements in the northwest quarter of Section 23, surrounded by the Lexington Square Additions. It was noted that the preceding applicant on the agenda was not yet ready, and requested to be placed later on the agenda. City Planner Runkle presented the application for the 17 lots completely surrounded by previously platted additions of Lexington Square. He indicated that a Comprehensive Guide Amendment was not required, however, a variance would be needed from R-1 requirements. The Lexington Square parcels surrounding the proposed plat did consist of lots of similar dimensions. Mr. Brad Swenson was present on behalf of the applicant consisting of an out-of- state partnership. Mr. Bill Kennedy of Lot 4, Block 7, Lexington Square was present and expressed concern regarding the value of the homes to be constructed in comparison to the homes presently built in that area. Mr. Swenson advised that the same builders, College City Builders, would be building the homes of a very similar nature to the ones in Mr. Kennedy's addition. The public hearing was closed. Discussion centered around the size of the lots in comparison to the surrounding lots. Voracek moved to recommend approval of the rezoning with a variance for the proposed lot dimensions to coincide with the residential lots ;. surrounding the proposed plat, Krisnik seconded the motion and all voted in .'' favor. LAW OFFICES ,STALLAND 8c STALLAND ONE CORPORATE CENTER FINANCIAL PLAZA 7261 OHMS LANE MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 86436 LUTHER M. STALLAND K. PETER STALLAND April 1, 1987 Mayor Bea Blomquist and Members of the Eagan City Council 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Blackhawk Plaza Conditional Use Permits to Allow Gas Pumps and Service Bays on Separate Lots Dear Madam Mayor and Members of the City Council: TELEPHONE (619) 835-8577 Please be advised that our office represents Mr. Steve Ramsey, dba Haven Enterprises, Inc. who is the developer and owner of Blackhawk Plaza at the corner of Blackhawk Road and Diffley Road in Eagan. As you know Mr. Ramsey has applied for condi- tional use permits to allow separation of gas pumps and ser- vice bays within the project. Although at time of preliminary and final plat, we received approval for a gas station with pumps on Lot 5 (which borders on Diffley Road), tenant demand has changed and Mr. Ramsey needs to place gas pumps next to the Blackhawk Road side of the shopping center for Tom Thumb's gro- cery store. The service bays will be incorporated into an auto service center which will be located on Lot 7 almost directly across from the Tom Thumb store. It is our opinion that Mr. Ramsey has a legal right to get the conditional use permits applied for pursuant to Eagan Ordinance Chapter 11.20, Subdivision 10(C). This Ordinance outlines cer- tain requirements which an applicant must meet for a condi- tional use permit within a neighborhood business district which is what the subject property is currently zoned. Where a zoning ordinance specifies standards for the approval of a special use permit which an applicant fully complies with, a denial of the permit is arbitrary as a matter of law. Metro 500, Inc. vs. City of Brooklyn Park (1973) 211 NW 2d 358. The City of Eagan's Ordinance states that automobile service sta- tions may be permitted if the applicant complies with five requirements. Mr. Ramsey will do his best to adhere to those requirements despite the fact that the Ordinance does not 55 Mayor Bea Blomquist and Members of the City Eagan Council April 1, 1987 Page Two address a situation where a permit application requests a separation of pumps and service bays. It should be noted by the City Council that when a city's ordinance is ambiguous relative to an application which affects a property owner's rights, the Supreme Court of Minnesota has made it clear that a city ordinance will be strictly construed against the city and in favor of the property owner. Amcon vs. City of Eagan (1984) 348 NW 2d 66. The City Council has already set a precedent in granting condi- tional use applications for separation of gas pumps and service bays. Examples are the Nichols and Cliff Road corner with the Holiday gas and service bays; Diffley and Lexington for the Kunz Oil pumps and bays; and more recently the B. B. D. Brooks Superette pumps and service bays at the corner of Yankee Doodle and Coachman Road where that project was also a neighborhood business district. Municipalities are constitutionally required to treat similarly situated people alike in applying standards contained in local zoning ordinances. Odell vs. Cit,,,_ of Eagan (1984) 348 NW 2d 792. Since the City has allowed other landowners to separate the pumps and the service within a commercial business district, it would only appear reasonable and fair for them to allow our client to do the same. As you know from your packet from the Planning staff, the Advisory Planning Commission on February 26, 1987 denied the permit application of our client. Three reasons were given for the denial as the Minutes reflect. The first reason was that "the pumps would be provided without a direct tie to service bays as required under the Ordinance." There is no such requirement under the Ordinance. The Ordinance itself does not refer in any manner whatsoever to a situation where pumps and service are separated. As stated before, the law in this state is that where an ordinance is ambiguous and vague the City should construe it in favor of the landowner. The second reason given was that "the service bays would be located too close to the cemetery area." It is hard to respond to this reason for denial since there appears to be no reason why a service bay would adversely affect this cemetery area by being too close. The third reason for denial states that "the gas pumps and lighting were too close to the residential areas." In a very recent case before the Court of Appeals of Minnesota a landowner was denied a conditional use permit to operate a 24 hour combination gas station and grocery store Mayor Bea Blomquist and Members of the Eagan City Council April 1, 1987 Page Three across the street from a residential neighborhood in the City of Minneapolis. The Court held that there was no adverse affects upon the residential neighborhood and that neighborhood opposition was not a legally sufficient reason for denying the permit. Amoco Oil Company vs. City of Minnea:,,olis (1986) 395 NW 2d 115. At the last City Council meeting the City Council allowed cer- tain neighbors to voice their objections about the project. These neighbors have objected to the project from the very beginning and have continuously attempted to thwart the develop- ment of the project at every turn. Not only are the neighbors' objections relative to the height of the shopping center and the lack of landscaping (which obviously cannot be installed until construction has been completed) irrelevant to the City Council determination on this conditional use permit, but also their objections relative to the specific conditional use per- mits are not legally sufficient for a City Council denial of same. Amoco Oil Company vs. City of Minnea2olis. It has long been the law of this state that a municipality may not condi- tion restricted uses of property upon the consent of private individuals such as owners of adjoining property. State ex rel Foster vs. City of Minneapolis (1959) 97 NW 2d 273; Metro 500, Inc. vs. City of Brooklyn Park (1973) 211 NW 2d 35.8; C. R. Investments, Inc. vs. Village of Shoreview (1981) 304 NW 2d- 320; Chanhassen Estates Residents Association vs. Cite of Chan- hassen (1984) 342 NW 2d 335. The owners and developers of the Blackhawk Plaza property have met with the adjoining neighbors on numerous occasions and have attempted to develop a project which will be an asset to both the City of Eagan and to the adjoining community. The subject property was zoned for general commercial business use many years before any of the surrounding residential properties were ever developed. That zoning has been public record and those neighbors had every opportunity to educate themselves to the surrounding uses of their property before they built their homes. Therefore, the neighbors have no legitimate basis to complain about gas pumps and service bays which are normal com- mercial uses. Our client has every intention of developing a beautiful neigh- borhood business center. He will comply with those conditions which the Planning Department has suggested in their staff 5', r Mayor Bea Blomquist and Members of the Eagan City Council April 1, 1987 Page Four report. We ask only that Mr. Ramsey be given the same type of fair treatment which other landowners have received from the City Council relative to their applications for gas pumps and service bays within a business district. Thank you for your consideration. Yours very truly, Peter Stalland PS/7J cc: Paul. Hauge, Esq. i --T- mas Hedges, City Administrator Dale Runkle, City Planner Thomas Colbert, City Engineer Steve Ramsey Charles Carmichael, Esq. George L. May, Esq. Darrel Deming Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen REFUNDING/SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS & WATER REVENUE BONDS A. Special Assessments and Water Revenue Bonds Refunding --The Director of Finance and City Administrator have been working with representatives of Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., to review and discuss the feasibility of refunding several general obligation improvement bonds and a water revenue bond issue for the City. Nearly all outstanding bond issues have been reviewed and it has been the conclusion of the City staff and Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., that two (2) bond issues that have previously been refunded should again be refunded in what is described as a crossover refunding bond issue and, six other bond issues should be grouped together into one (1) advanced refunding bond issue. The City Council could also refund the water revenue bonds of 1983. The Director of Finance and City Administrator are recommending that the two (2) bonds that were previously refunded be included in a crossover refunding bond issue and several other general improvement bond issues be grouped into one umbrella and sold as an advanced refunding bond issue. In the case of the umbrella bond issue, the debt will be shortened to four (4) years and there will be assurance to the City that all of the general obligation improvement bond issues will not have a negative cash flow at the end of the four years. Anytime debt is shortened by either a call or a refunding, the City improves its future status for a higher bond rating. Also, due to the high rate of pre -payments and the restriction on reinvestments due to the low rate of interest, one or two funds could incur a negative balance which would either require a transfer from another bond fund or general tax levy prior to defeasing the bond issue. The advanced refunding will provide certain assurances to the City that these bond funds will have a positive cash flow at the time debt is retired. Most of the bond issues that are out- standing have interest rates at approximately 9% and would be refunded at a rate of approximately 5% which generates a consider- able savings to the City. The City Administrator requested a memo from Miller and Schroeder that outlines the bond issues that are being proposed for refunding, explains and defines a crossover refunding bond issue and gives reasons why the City should consider refunding certain bond issues at this time. This memo is no longer appropriate due to the continuance. �9 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen The Chairman of the Finance Committee, City Councilmember Jim Smith, has been apprised of the proposed refunding and if members of the Finance Committee, either City Councilmember Egan or City Councilmember Smith, have any concerns upon reviewing this informa- tion and would like a Finance Committee meeting prior to the City Council meeting on Tuesday, arrangements will be made on either Monday or Tuesday to hold the meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To 1) establish a bond sale date for May 6, 1987, at 12:00 noon, 2) authorize a bond rating from Standard and Poor's and Moody's, and 3) authorize a member of the City Council, Director of Finance and City Administrator to secure a bond rating in New York if a meeting is deemed necessary. Special Note: This item is to be continued indefinitely allowing staff and the fiscal consultants additional review. Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen VARIANCE FOR CANOPY SETBACK SUPER AMERICA FACILITY B. Variance to Allow a 17' Canopy Setback Variance Along Pilot Knob Road for the SuperAmerica Facility --An application was submitted by the SuperAmerica Company requesting a 17' canopy setback variance along Pilot Knob Road. The normal setback requirement is 50' and the canopy is proposed at a location that would require a 17' variance or would be placed 33' from the right-of-way. For additional information and the reason SuperAmerica Inc. is proposing the new canopy, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages _(.Z, through 6,S . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: variance as submitted by SuperAmerica Inc. variance along Pilot Knob Road. (V To approve or deny the for a 17' canopy setback CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: SUPERAMERICA INC LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SUPERAMERICA ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 7, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: :MARCH 27, 1987 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM, PLANNING DEPT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the Superamerica Company requesting a 17' canopy setback variance along Pilot Knob Road. This canopy, considered a building struc- ture, has a 50' setback requirement - 33' is proposed. The canopy will cover a proposed fourth gas pump island with 5 pumps. The parking/drive lane setback will not be affected by this request. With this proposal, Superamerica will substantially increase the .perimeter landscaping. The original/approved plan in 1984 did not have berming or any coniferous plant material for year-round interest and screening. This revised plan with undulating berming between the existing ash trees will add: 100 Maney Junipers, a bluish shrub with a vertical form; 39 Isanti Dogwoods grouped around the trunks of the ash trees; and 128 'Gold Flame' Spirea. This plant has bright green leaves and hot pink flowers in the spring. The revised landscape plan will greatly enhance the image of that intersection as well as provide screening of the cars around the pump area. This plan meets all of the performance standards within the City's landscape policy. If approved, this Variance shall be subject to: 1) A striped 'No Parking' area as shown to allow an uninterrupted drive aisle. JS/j j �§ � � � ƒ 14!|... . K ROM i � /\ \�� ��i Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty VARIANCE SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR HEDLUND AND JOHNSON C. Variance to Allow Change in Side Yard Setback Requirement for Kal vin Hedlund and Steven Johnson on Lot 6, Block 3, Rahn Ridge Addition --A variance application was submitted to the City by Kal vin Hedlund and Steven Johnson requesting a 2' variance in Parcel B and a 5' variance in Parcel A for a duplex family home located on Lot 6, Block 3, Rahn Ridge Addition. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages j through e'(,_. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance request for a 5' variance in Parcel A and a 2' variance in Parcel B as requested by Kalvin Hedlund and Steven Johnson. 6� CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: KALVIN HEDLUND AND STEVEN JOHNSON LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 3, RAHN RIDGE EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 7, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 24, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a 2' variance on Parcel Banda 5' variance on Parcel A for duplex family homes located on Lot 6, Block 3, Rahn Ridge Addition. PLANNER COMMENTS: The applicant property is bounded by Vienna Lane on the east and south, Kings Road on the west and Pin Oak Drive on the north. The appl.icant's property is principally bounded by duplex structures. Initial construction plans for this property called for a deck on both Parcels A and B which requires a 5' setback in both cases. During the construction of the duplex, however, the owners chose to convert the decks into three season porches which instead of the 5' setback, requires a 10' setback. As a consequence, Parcel B requires a variance of 2' and Parcel A requires a variance of 5'. Examination of Building Inspection records indicate the contractor was informed construction of three -season porches instead of decks would violate City Ordinances concerning building setbacks. To date, however, construction of the porches has essentially been completed and the Building Inspections Department is withholding the structure occupancy permit until the setback issue is resolved. If the variance application is approved, all other City ordinances shall apply to this property. (�5 Hedlund Engineering Services 9201 East WoominatonFrog" 61001011Vton,Mhrreota 66420 Lod Surveyors Civil Engineers Land Planners Phone: 688-02as r Sur gO,r-(S e&i1iWtC AIWA BOOK _ PAGE JOB NO. 86' 329 IlWft Y FOR: Calvin Hedlund / Steve Johnson DLV.RWD AS: PARCEL A: That Part of Lot 6, Block 3, RAHN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying northeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said Lot 6 distant 21.09 feet east of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the south line of said Lot 6 distant 112.08 feet east of the southwest corner thereof, as measured along said line, and reserving easements of record. PARCEL B: That part of Lot 6, Block 3, RAHN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying southwesterly of a line drawn from a Point on the north line of said Lot 6 distant 21.09 feet east of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the south line of said Lot 6 distant 112.08 feet east of the southwest corner thereof, as measured along said line, and reserving easements of record. CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION OF SUILO1NG 1 hereby certify that an 9-8- i�oRCH oG�+o +u V•+•�• I made a survey of the location of the building on the above doscribed property( and that 1110 location of said building Is U V corrocily shown an the above at. �, ,.+ W Z 934,0 936.9 { ° L 344_2 9..62 � .� EH57 947j ^' PROPOS �,,�� 00Oro d�0� 'R IOP OF FO ATION = 941.0 GARAGE OOR =940.5 • 5� v I E N IV A FAS�btENT FLOOR :;—F ER SERVICE ELEV. _ 9_44.6 9'42,g PROPOSED ELEVATIONS : Q EXISTING ELEVATIONS DRAINAGE DIRECTIONS : —►— CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY - DENOTES LOT CORNERS : 0 I hereby certify that on 7 /29 /86 I surveyed the propW !�!�_ i0Q'1 1"VTdWtho1 the above plot is a correct representation of sold survey.((-' J Jaffr y indgren, LiceWse No. 14376 MY Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One VARIANCE/FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT/EDWARD GALLAGHER D. Variance to Allow Change in Front Yard Setback Requirement for Edward L. Gallagher, Lot 16, Block 5, Cedar Grove 2nd Addition --An application for a variance request has been submitted by Edward L. Gallagher requesting a 9' front setback variance for a front entry and attached garage for a single family home located on Lot 16, Block 5, Cedar Grove 2nd Addition. For additional information on the variance request, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a 9' front yard setback variance for front entry and attached garage for Edward L. Gallagher as presented. Note: The City requires that all persons within 200' of any property owner requesting a variance be sent a notice of the proposed variance and a date when the variance will be considered by the City Council. This applies to all the variances that are under consideration by the City Council as a part of New Business. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: EDWARD L. GALLAGHER LOCATION: LOT 16, BLOCK 5, CEDAR GROVE ADDITION #2 EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DATE OF -PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 7, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 24, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a 9' front setback variance for a front entry and attached garage for a single family home located on Lot 16, Block 5, Cedar Grove 2nd Addition. PLANNER COMMENTS: The applicant's property is bounded by Jasper Drive on the east, Sandstone Drive on the south, Amber Drive on the west and Coral Lane on the north. Adjacent lots are typically 75' x 120' with an approximate total square footage of 9,000 square feet. Specifically, the applicant's property is 75' x 120' for a total of 9,000 square feet. The applicant argues that a 9' front setback variance is essential to construct a front entry and attached garage on the east side of the existing one story house because sufficient space is not existent for an attached standard two car garage; and an unattached garage is not feasibile since a side variance would be required and result in -the removal of a mature large willow tree. If this variance application is approved, the applicant shall adhere to all other City ordinances. I I Ur11Nj say nue PLAT DRAWING insurance comoanU (THIS IS NOT A SURVEY) f J, ORDER NO.: 1 V- / 2 3 0 �- INSP. DATE: STREET ADDRESS: l_f LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ZC2� INS . BY: _6 -7—c-- w 7immisimi ■■■■ ■■ll ■E■ ■ ���>.I■II�■■wi�www■■■r ■�■� r■■ MEMO `►. 1►■■■■ ■EM■■■Eat■■�`�■��■ NOON■■.■■.■ ■■■■ ■..E■■■■■■■ ■■ 0■■■ ■" ■. ■■ NONE ■M.■■■ ■■■■OMI..INNOON..■.■■I■■. ■�.E■ 1�■NNE■ ■E■..■■ ■■ ■■.■ ■■■ ■. ■■■■■ 1■■■■�.■■■■ ■■■O M �■ ■■■ E■■M.ME ■ .� .■■■ IM►. ■.■■■E►�.O.M.�■E• ■iINN ■.■■■ NONE ■GI■■■■■■■■�■ ►I i� ■■ ■■■E■ Gi11■■�■ EENT ■■■E■ ■■,,, ,R 'ME ■■■ ■■■■■■ ■■1■■■■�I■ EE■J■■■ ■ /i■■ ■■■� NOON NOON■ N1■ ■■RRI NWIMM I■ M■■■ i■■■�■■■■.■■ MEMO ■■■■■■■■■■.■ ■■■■.■.■■■■■■■■■ IMMEMEMMIMEMMIMMEMENNEEMEN No NOON ■■�E■■■■tet■r�.■■■.■■■r■■■ ■■E■■. NONE ■.■■■.■■■.■■..■■■.■■.■■CSEEMS ON ....[�■E.■.■..M.IMEMISIMEM `■■■EE■E■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■E■■■E ■■■■■ SEMI im■ ■■■■■■■M■ME■S IMMESIM EM■■MSICon EMso MONISM F. MEN EEM 0 SOMEONE=■■EEM■IM■■.■E■■■C ■■M■■ ■■.NNE■ MENEON■■ WMEME E®■GENG= :.ii :rte � ■ � :..1 I ■■■■■■■E■■■■■■■■■■M■E5■�■■- ■■MIME ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■G�:`Ni■E.E■ ■■■N ■ MEMO= ■.EME■E.■E■ ■■E ■ ME M■■ ■ ..■■■ ■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■■.■■■■. ■INI■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■ ■■■■: . ructiv 911 11 e inspection,w�sescribecl in the insured Mortgage, as on a visual and taped land shown those Countv records which under the .: autl Fjrad0Jd ISOM 70 Jasper Dr. I z 3 4 S u S e 1a It, Il IS 11 2021 .D4 Z':. " 3 Ft. 75' X 120' = 9,000' t 9 = 1,000' t 5 = 200' Existing Structure 44' X 22' = 968' Proposed Garage 20' X 39' = 780' Proposed Entry 5' X 9' - 45' 1,795' t 9 = 199.3' See Attached Letter for Notes A (Back Step & Door) B (Large Healthy Willow Tree) 71 ,1 B L rge Healthy Will,u Tree I i m r T, u ; peck' i''utuTe N + IIj d w Proposed Attached Garage (20' X 39') 780' w ff A Existing Structure (One Story House) (44' X 221) 968' Pi� posed Fron Entry (5' X 9') 45' APRON 1 1 � l ' DRIVEWAY 1 J* 1 1 f 1 EXHIBIT A. Jasper Dr. I z 3 4 S u S e 1a It, Il IS 11 2021 .D4 Z':. " 3 Ft. 75' X 120' = 9,000' t 9 = 1,000' t 5 = 200' Existing Structure 44' X 22' = 968' Proposed Garage 20' X 39' = 780' Proposed Entry 5' X 9' - 45' 1,795' t 9 = 199.3' See Attached Letter for Notes A (Back Step & Door) B (Large Healthy Willow Tree) 71 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-two VARIANCE%FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR MICHAEL MARXER E. Variance to Allow Change in Front Yard Setback Requirements for Michael Marxer, Lot 1, Block 1, Greensboro 1st Addition --An application for a variance was submitted by Mr. Michael Marxer, requesting a 4.35' building setback along Wescott Road in the Greensboro 1st Addition. This property is zoned R-1 single family and described as Lot 1, Block 1, Greensboro 1st Addition. This lot has front yard setbacks on two streets: 50' along Wescott and 30' along Greensboro Drive where the driveway is proposed. The building cannot be moved to the north anymore and meet and side yard setback of 10'. If approved the variance shall be subject to all applicable ordinances. For a copy of a site location for the Michael and Coleen Marxer property, refer to the attachment on page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the front yard setback requirement for the Michael Marxer property. TRI -LAND CO. SURVEYING SERVICES 4655 NICOLS ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 j � 5 4� rq__ SITE PLAN FOR: MICHAEL. a COLEEN MARXER 6^ Z � J1 =e N 89031'56" E 150.00 j Drainage o�rd WPI � X220.000-oo 1 - -* r, 0 I LOT I r 90 N 0 o - vv;/ 5� o Dr*Jr+g9e and Arty Ewgemem; 993 150.00 E A S T WESCOTT ROAD PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 10 N d' N 0 ON O z a 9; LOT I , BLOCK I , GREENSBORO FIRST ADD. according to the recorded plat thereof 73 SCALE I 30 DAKOTA County, Minnesota = PXr. nl Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-three WAIVER OF PLAT/DUPLEX LOT SPLIT FOR ADVANCE DEVELOPERS F. Waiver of Plat to Allow a Duplex Lot Split for Advance Developers on Lot 1, Block 1, Suncliff 3rd Addition --An application was received from Advance Developers Inc. requesting a waiver of plat to split three (3) duplex lots for individual ownership. The applicant's properties are located in the northeast quadrant of Beaver Dam Road and Deer Hills Trail, immediately south of Diffley Road. All setbacks for this property meet code requirements and are serviced by separate utilities. The zoning is planned development under the Eagan Hills P.U.D. If the waiver of plat application is approved, the property shall be subject to all applicable ordinances. For a copy of the location maapp and specific unit descriptions, refer to pages through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat to allow a duplex lot split for Advance Developers as presented. 7� A Z ur W 1- Q U O N N 4 mo oQ Z� avoa NMVHHOVISce a �s S I z OI Opp,Opp, _ Q sfli tirp O 1.y ~^ cc TlI/ Q !rM W 1j H QU OCl/ Q Q a� 1s1J 2 sfa a1.1 Kd Q �{� l I aM 0111 24 It#/ "Ol0-1 i r U � a NII 1� 01AF* // p LL Z . _ Tcw ne O O / 1 °ICY CL U 1 5' 1 Ui z au lou V x Iqy 2 f i LL�� ar -10" 1/rJ 1fr/ 10 ` i7 �7 p I ,Fl 9 I „ 011 I w 0 e L =� avoa wvo a3AV39 I C.R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS Tel. 645.3646 181 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 55108 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Foil: ADVANCE DEVELOPERS, INC DEER / /lLL5 TX,414. Lot 4, Dlock 1, SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota exept the southeasterly 44.4 feet thereof. WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE. ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND. Dated this ZO day of NOUC ti`r/ A.D. 19 !7G C. R. WINDEN 6 ASSOCIATES. INC. Av-m Zce kd /2 -/8 -BG by Surveyor, Minnesota Registration No.� G /q D I i i ��-�NO�YTh'ERN /Y�ru.PNL (� AS �Ompc�ny `gSE,NEyr S 47' 20' SO" E 4J.60 f_EO / _ j S� u A.4 rn a h� oh Scale: 1" = 30' a N x/885 =� a� o Denotes Iron Monument 2.1 ' I !Y4 -92_, J 1 s f 43.60 44.40 DEER / /lLL5 TX,414. Lot 4, Dlock 1, SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota exept the southeasterly 44.4 feet thereof. WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE. ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND. Dated this ZO day of NOUC ti`r/ A.D. 19 !7G C. R. WINDEN 6 ASSOCIATES. INC. Av-m Zce kd /2 -/8 -BG by Surveyor, Minnesota Registration No.� G /q D I i i C.R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS Tel. 645.3646 1381 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 55108 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: ADVANCE DEVELOPERS, INC. NO,YTHERAI NATURAL CAS COmPANY L A5EM elyr-, 1 13.60 _ 0. 4r0 m � � V `CV I ,Z'Ovlfrwns 2 I n 2B--�--/ b.i QM W #1893 m j 22.1 �,N 2.r 2 Scale: 1" 301. t 9 Denotes Iron Monument 1p e 93.60 49.90 5 SO'/F'E9'�E DEER /7/LL5 /RANG The southeasterly 44.4.fcet of Lot 4, Block 1, SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF TIIE BOUNDARIES OF TIIE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON. AND ALI. VISIBLE ENCROACIIMENTS. IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. Dated this 70 day of /1/'j4C--%k/ A.D. 172/ C. R. WINDEN b ASSOCIATES, INC. ISSwe loeoln/ /z•/g •g6 -77 by w•" f C. Surveyor, Minnesota Registration No. l C.R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS Tel. 6A5.3646 1381 EUSTIS ST., ST, PAUL, MINN. 53108 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: ADVANCE DEVELOPERS, INC. ;..�Norlhern Naiurcgl Gas Compdng E asernenf - 66.23 63.43 / -1- i_ S 5I inrn/ 0' / •� Q I F' 213 O O JrL�_ Scale: I"=30' ry e Denotes Iron �Monument 14.4 3 c.: � � i 550'14'29"E R• lei BE5j/.a � � 4. /�•g8ep0.. DEE R HILLS T That part of Lot 5, Block 1, SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota lying northwesterly of a line described as follows and its southwesterly prolongation: Beginning at a.point on the northeast line of said Lot 5 distant 63.43 feet northwest of the most easterly corner of said Lot 5; thence southwesterly to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 5 distant 37.87 feet northwesterly, measured along said southwesterly line, from the most southerly corner of said Lot 5 and said line there terminating. WE iIEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF TIIF- BOUNDARIES OF TIIE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, tF ANY, FROH OR ON SAID LAND. Dated thle L79 day of LklyA.D. 196� C. R. WINDEN h ASSOCIATES, INC. AUse Loealed /Z•/8-86 g by ._•�'. L �_�' Surveyor, Minnesota Registration No.J/ 7 9 Agenda Information April 7, 1987, City Page Twenty -Four Memo Council Meeting SPECIAL PERMIT/DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR COLDWELL BANKER G. Special Permit to Allow a 4' x 8' Two Directional Sign for Coldwell Banker --A special permit application was submitted by Coldwell Banker to allow a two directional sign located in the NW 1/4 of Section 34, adjacent to Cliff Road and across from Ches Mar Drive. - This application was received prior to a special workshop session that was held on Tuesday, March 31, and the City Council determined that no additional advertising signs will be allowed and further that existing advertising signs would be phased out during the next two (2) years. Since the applicant has processed their special permit and this item was advertised in the newspaper as an official agenda item, they have the right to be heard and considered by the City Council. The City is proceeding with a review and revision of the temporary advertising sign language in the City Code, however, that will not be available for a final ratification until a May meeting. For additional information on the special permit as presented by Coldwell Banker, refer to the Pla ing Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages 00 through . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the two - directional sign as requested by Coldwell Banker. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: COLDWELL BANKER (DALE MEANS) LOCATION: 1370 CLIFF ROAD (NW 1/4 OF SECTION 34) EXISTING ZONING: AGRICULTURE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 7, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 24, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a special permit to allow a two directional sign located in the NW 1/4 of Section 34, adjacent to Cliff Road and across from Ches Mar Drive. The purpose of a sign is to publicize the location of Wilderness Ponds, a single family development recently approved by the Eagan City Council. The subject sign is within the 'City Code requirement and has a dimension of 4' x 8' for a total -of 32 square feet on each side. The sign will consist of blue and brown colors and if approved by the City Council, be at least 10' or more from the property line. If approved, the sign shall be subject to all applicable sign ordinances. •` �� , ?I z fi Z. • � � - - 1-- {fit t {I; { 1 Proposal For Wilderness Ponds- L t yyy��ppp4 Development r' • • Sign blue & brown09Cliff �y - b Road /H1lNE PARI / - Zi z } Fl_AJ(E m HIGH SITE OR.' O + J ¢ O z u { Y 19 -SLDRIN-M---- J 9 W� t7 ,RICE I-TAMARAC PT. \' / a r QUARRY PARK - 2- BIRCH PT. 7% _ r•' 3- NORWAY Pr. I BLUFF w 4- FOREST RIDGE T -i 6- IRONWOOD LN. 6- REDWOOD 7 - SPRUCE PT. i VANIcf :, -�.:#C LE {hofs sC a'> ACF' xaaa•..,�-., J y; x I I = J r 1 Co Re. No.OR - iti \�� WATER i 5 ,T I CENTRE Y�6---_- _r___ �J 'P N - yOP• rN KOST TREATMENT - G ',4Y .' ® ' C -1 I FACILITY ¢ - OR '* 0LEARY PARK I s S EEN •di a2 10 CARR/ACi PUBLIC O W000 4• 31. WORKS u I e .-ti .Q`th HILLS GOLF!r------------ GARAGE JX11 �3«)t i BLUE JAY COURSE `\ iiip Cyl3 FSk , OUCKWOOO ' N YIOLET _I'1'+ \ 1 J I ¢ I WOO 3°CJ'vR � L• CK DR. tVE ----- 4 f4 - STRIDGEST. _. LA !. _ ¢i IRCHPONp LI12!I" S c2' .BL E JAr WA/17� r` I �,fJ z,!5fJIC Y IA ENGLE' KOLS7A T _ SUR G' ' �tPVO, ��:CKH-0MK IJr � L4- pVE ; 3 SOUTH I Pp 31 HILLS -R0. DEpRK .� Q ." SOUT}f .'%i� -`•i s% 1 xFj r CT E. :S S � QI p�2 '�s' HILLS ' MAv LA. ` �,'h,:, i} y FIRE' cFRT. AOM. 6 �i ARK DRMA E qk` I COMM. ROOM�yo A4E LPTO 1 TRAIL ✓ L� so HI S w •J _ __ _ 1 -"V�"Y �� SOE -- RD. •"*+ HIL S xEscc pAKPT L AIR o • 4: 7I I~ h cr F, �M:3COTT O �IIrAGAN SI MUKCPAL IELA LIfFI 4 - u f j I � 'NST CR Ca/YTER J h RD. ft 4,.. KCCyGS� I: WIN CRE WFSi P I� �la z, 'MpOp Rpol P RC-:,W ¢A L.tir. STy�W 'YAB }• ' .. OCA„ DAVAVE ORT o I �aLD AVE m W14DCREST g; PARR IDGEu NORTHVIEW PAR ONI. D ERWOOD_ xl _r OR.- _ I jWRRY- h . d PATCH ,a, _ P' RK P� ,r . - 55,121 WIlm w WLN. bOLARK R0. 1 � c? jr Y �i � , w C v' 1 i I lo . Lq 41 X�iA co. Re N. ?o 14 _ r � � � = m'O (Co. Rd. N R 3 = � Q No. 3O ' OIFFLEY AO - ' w �y J a LSA. I < IFFLE le .a LLEMSON EM,L'CK i W '¢ riORfS N PL. S Z � J � � •l. J � J 11d6L`LA NPL. ' CT. ++ SL.M I -,•y ST Y L LAKE Opp p1 FJ IT T B4rL� j w VPN gW ST EOME - P i d �. �4'S pl. 'KE INGtON `O (It'ACKR1pRE rr �q CT -yoI'q N t a p N iL COAT C F VERG/7FE IR.ra S7 S L o '. z u4 J zHILL ¢ �T PARK ¢ W ar 2 Y S7LING CIEMSON PARK I Y CA o ] CC' M1 r- LIR. } ¢ WALNUT HILL r� PARK j/ AQUARIUS LA (al R '.^"-;g `, •P i tiQ X02,+"1 WEOGW0py/3 �Rr y�LL PARK a x /jVL� 41-L f tir r, I \ C �•. .ti�OR. OAK LEAf WATE OR,SUDB �• ER v1 ` CIR Y 3 .•pPRr-;,l'��� j j _¢ R r QK f": �m P'I'E PH LA„•, mq�, D RR AVARK INE! •It 1'9 !l LIRI SAFARI' C+ Y- LAK i N �`P. ,PF ¢ 4- /�l py 3P LA. o_ Y _ \P' i6 pp'I'. OAK POND N'z' 'HILLS PARK HZ a u z i WAY �—,-�I!BEA LA ICA. RQ No ORI NARO•S CLIFF R w Co. Rd No. 32) -CLIFF_..: �a� H[TL d - EN TON e'f 4 ? 3 ¢ LA WALDENIr. N£1GN73 Ir y Y S a I PARK PARKVIEW II Q �Z z AL Z. �J `7 L GOLF c ING N �J ' • a o n'ILL 7 _ � 't ,rte I ; W �:'•� COURSE g _ All. ��v� •.� ��NN CIR. v P c Pa CAMP r . cIP• �:'.. 11�+ ! .V \\�9i �I�.� BUTWIN A MEMBER Of THE SEARS FINANCIAL NETWORK g COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES 7495 W te7TH STREET APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 (612) 432-0020 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Permission is hereby granted to Dale Means - Coldweil Banker to install a Development Sign on my Property. NAME —CM2 " C � 6 / 17e, � DATE I Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five WAIVER OF PLAT/JAMES UNRER, CLEARVIEW ADDITION H. Waiver of Plat (James Unker) in Order to Split Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition Into Two Separate 1/2 Acre Parcels --A public hearing was first held by the Advisory Planning Commission at the February 26 meeting to consider a waiver of plat application to split Lot 10, Block 3 of the Clearview Addition into two (2) separate parcels sharing a common accesss on the north side of Cliff Road. The APC continued the application for 30 days raising concern with several conditions that were originally contained in the staff's report. At the March 24, 1987 meeting, the APC again considered the waiver of plat application and is recommending approval of the lot split as presented with modification to the original conditions. For a copy of the staff report submitted for the February 26 meeting and the revisions that pertain mainly to the Engineering Department, refer to a copy of that port dated March 19, 1987. These reports are enclosed on pages through For a copy of the APC minutes on both the February 26 and March 24 meetings, refer to pages /D Y through . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat as requested by James Unker for a lot split of Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition. 01 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: JAMES UNKER LOCATION: LOT 10, BLOCK 3, CLEARVIEW ADDITION SE 1/4 OF SECTION 29 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 26, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 13, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by James Unker of 1775 Cliff Road, requesting a waiver of plat in order to split Lot 10, Block 3, of the Clearview Addition into two separate parcels sharing a common access on the north side of Cliff Road, just east of Lenore Lane. Parcel A, containing the existing home will measure 188 feet x 280 feet (27,518 S.F.). Parcel B will measure 90 feet x 280 feet (25,200 S.F.). The applicant intends to build another single family home on Parcel B and has stated that he would not propose any additional splits in the future. An additional access to Lenore Lane and full platting requirements will be required if in the future the creation of another lot is desired. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer is available from the existing 8" lateral and manhole in the southeast corner of Lot 10. The elevation of this sanitary sewer requires a minimum basement floor elevation of 940.0 for any house constructed on Parcel B (west half of Lot 10). In order to provide service for Parcel B, an easement will have to be dedicated across Parcel A (east half of Lot 10). In addition, due to the minimum elevations and the existing topography of the property, this seer service will have to be insulated as it crosses under the existing driveway presently servicing the existing house on proposed Parcel A. The alignment of this sewer service should be directed through the existing opening in the grove of trees on this property. There is presently an existing water service for the existing house on proposed Parcel A. A new water service will have to be installed to provide service to the newly created lot (Parcel B). Either a new water service will have to be bored underneath Cliff Road (no open cuts allowed), or an easement will have to'be acquired from Lot 9 on the west to allow connection to the existing water main in Lenore Lane. Due, to the complexities involved with either alternate, it is anticipated that this water service will be relatively expensive. 96 GRADING & DRAINAGE: There is presently a landlocked low drainage basin over the common lot line of existing Lots 9 and 10 of Block 3, Clearview Addition. This drainage basin presently serves the east one-third of Lot 9, the south two-thirds of Parcel B and the south one-third of Parcel A, and a small portion of Outlot B of Woodgate 2nd Addition to the east. If this Waiver is approved, a storm sewer outlet should be constructed for this drainage basin draining the outlet into the Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north and not into the existing storm sewer system along Cliff Road. STREETS/DRIVEWAYS: Cliff Road (County Road 32) is presently classified as a minor arterial. Subseqently, it is anticipated that the County will not allow an additional driveway access associated with this lot split. Therefore, it should be a condition of this Waiver that restricted access control be`dedicated across the entire frontage of Lot 10 (both Parcels A and B) allowing only a singular driveway access at its present location to be shared by both lots. EASEMENTS/PERMITS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY: Sufficient right-of-way has bee - previously dedicated to accommodate the existing Cliff Road sectio; In addition, the County has retained a 25' construction easement across the south portion of Lot 10 to accommodate any potential future reconstruction activities that may be necessary. Either a permit from the County Highway Department or an easement from the owner of Lot 9 must be obtained prior to final approval providing for the accessibility of a new water service for the newly created lot. Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be acquired and/or dedicated to accommodate the storm water outlet from the existing low drainage basin presently existing along the west side of Lot 10 to the Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north. A sanitary sewer service easement shall be dedicated across t southeast corner of Lot 10 (Parcel A) to accommodate the sew -r service extension to service Parcel B. A cross easement shall be executed providing for common use of the existing driveway for the newly created parcel and the existing house. c e, ASSESSMENTS: Lot 10, Block 3, of Clearview Addition was previously assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer and trunk area water main for its existing one lot use. Any subsequent subdivisions will have to pay the additional per lot equivalent for these related trunk, area assessments. The entire frontage of Lot 10 had been previously assessed for Cliff Road improvements. Therefore, no additional street related assessments are associated with this proposed split. Trunk area storm sewer has not yet been levied over any of the lots within the Clearview Addition. Therefore, the entire area of Lot 10 is subject to trunk area storm sewer assessments as a condition of this approval. Lateral benefit from existing water main will be required as a condition of approval to allow connection of the additional water service. All these assessment obligations are identified as follows: ITEM QUANTITY RATE A14OUNT PROJECT # Trunk Area Sanitary Sewer 1 Lot $625/Lot $625 86-A Trunk Area Water Main 1 Lot $600/Lot $600 147 Trunk Area Storm Sewer 52,000 sf $0.053/sf $2,794 235 Lateral Benefit from Water Main 90 if $12.47 $1,122 235 Final assessment obligations will be based on final quantities and rates in effect at the time of final waiver of platting approval. SOILS: Due to the existing low drainage basin incorporating a major portion of the proposed newly created lot and the limited area for constructing a single-family house, it is strongly recommended that a soils investigation study be completed to ensure adequate foundation material exists for a new house. 41 CONDITIONS JAMES DNKER: 1. All applicable Code requirements shall be adhered to. 2. Any further divisions of Lot 10 will require a replatting process. 3. This waiver shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 4. Either a permanent and construction easement shall be obtained from Lot 9 or a County utility permit shall be obtained to allow construction of the required water service for the newly created lot. 5. A sanitary sewer service easement shall be dedicated over the southeast portion of Lot 10 as required to provide sanitary sewer service to the newly created parcel (west half). 6. A drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated and a storm j sewer outlet shall be constructed from the existing low drainage basin on the west side of Lot 10 to the Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north. 7. A restrictive access control easement shall be dedicated to the County Highway Department across the entire frontage of Lot 10 with the exception of the existing driveway access location. S. A cross easement shall be provided allowing common use of the existing.driveway for both newly created parcels. 9. Minimum floor elevation of the new house shall be established at 940.0, and the sanitary sewer service construction shall be properly insulated. 10. A soils investigation report shall be prepared verifying adequate soils to accommodate a new building site.' 11. This development shall be responsible for any outstanding, unlevied or deferred assessments or other financial obligations i associated with this development at the rates in effect at the time of final approval. 12. Sanitary sewer and water services shall be installed to the lot line of the newly created lot as a condition of approval. SIGMA SURVEYING' SERVICES 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Phone: (612) 452-3077 t;T P.O.I. Lot Division Certificate Fot. Mr. JIM UNKER 'c3 I EAST 189.00 - I nn7f O PAL. d PARCEL OD 25,200 Sq. Ft. z , 7I �i qo.c Z ,I : 01 I "`— PARCEL' r I A x 27,518 Sq.Ft. �W r col � N W I •� I N A i u i � � • Zp,6 � � i x" fix Q C I Proposed � �'�� ' / w - 7 DRIVEWAY N la 0% �r ,� I•-td�. �P9, / �e / o? / EASEMENT _ G ram .a -k a I Zoo OD. ... 9't 5 6 e E$T 87.56 - PP__._.- 125.2 •—. _—. .�_ _ _C_ur6� ( CL 1 FF ROAD) 96 -N- 1 1�I=5o i:0 C.S.A.H. No. 32 91 L� MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE: MARCH 19, 1987 SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT - JAMES LINKER (LOT 10, BLOCK 3 CLEARVIEW ADDITION) At the February 26 Planning Commission meeting, the above -referenced application was continued for 30 days due to the applicant's concern with several conditions of approval that were contained in the staff's report. A copy of the original staff report and conditions is again presented to the Planning Commission for their review and reference during consideration of this item. Also attached is a copy of a letter from the attorney representing Mr. Unker addressing their concerns regarding the conditions of approval. The following is staff's response to their comments as identified in that letter: #4 Revised condition is the same as staff's original condition. #5 Revised condition is the same as as staff's original condition. k - #6 The staff is agreeable to revising the original condition to provide for a grading plan that would allow overland drainage in lieu of the required storm sewer. However, staff objects to deferring this condition until issuance of building permit as it is critical tQ mak.ing this proposed newly created lot a buildable lot. #7 Staff has no objection to their proposed revision. #9 Staff has no objection to their proposed revision. #10 Staff has no objection to their proposed revision. #11 Staff does not agree with the proposed condition revision. Through the creation of a new buildable lot, all outstanding, unlevied or deferred assessments should be brought up to date as a condition 'of creating this new parcel.. Detailed assessment checks are not routinely performed with building permit applications. This is based on the City's policy that all assessment obligations are current at the time of creating a buildable lot. 'The trunk,area storm sewer should be an obligation whether or not an internal lateral storm sewer system is installed. . #12 Staff objects to the proposed revision. Through the creation of a new buildable lot, it is City policy to ensure that it is properly serviced with sanitary sewer and water services in// addition to adequate street access. (/ / 1 ' N The staff will be available to discuss our response to their proposed revision in further detail at the Planning Commission meeting. Director of Public Works TAC/jj MINNESOTA OFFICE: 4635 NICOLS RD. - SUITE 206 EAGAN. MN 55122 (6121454-5440 March 6, 1987 SCHEIDE, STAHNKE & SMITH, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW PHILIP N. SCHEIDE • BRADLEY SMITH •' KATHRYN COOPER STAHNKE " CARRIE G. MARSH " • Admitted to Praoice in Minnnota. Wisconsin, and West Virginia — Admitted to Practice in Minnesota Planning and Engineering Departments City of Eagan Eagan Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: James Unker Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Dear Planning and Engineering Departments: I have reviewed with James Unker the City Staff report dated February 13, 1987 and on his behalf would propose certain changes to the proposed conditions for the purpose of allowing added flexibility for Mr. Unker's ultimate development of the property. A. Mr. Unker would like to clarify that while he has no present intention to propose future lot splits, he would like to leave that option open, with the understanding that the formal platting process would have to be followed at that time. B. We understand that a sanitary sewer connection to Parcel B could be done by gravity connection or a pumped connection. If a gravity connection is used the 940 foot minimum elevation is appropriate. If a pumped connection is made, we prefer that the minimum elevation not be required. C. To the extent possible, Mr. Unker would prefer to use utility easements along the lot line between Lots 8 and 9, Block 3, Clearview for connecting sanitary sewer and water to Lenore Lane. He understands that additional easements, either temporary, permanent or both, may be necessary, and to the extent necessary, he would agree to be responsible for obtaining additional easements. D. While the report does not specifically state this, we assume that utility lines and services would not„need to be installed until the time of construction on Parcel B. E. Mr. Unker would like the option to fill and grade Lot 10 to provide natural storm water drainage to the pond, rather than install a storm sewer line on the lot. Any filling and grading would only be done after approval by the City of an appropriate grading plan. q3 SCHEIDE, STAHNKE & SMITH, P.A. Page Two Planning and Engineering Departments March 6, 1987 F. The restrictive access control easement is acceptable, if the allowed access width is 20 feet at the current location. Mr. Unker will deal directly with the County on this issue and merely wants City approval for up to 20 feet in width subject to County approval. G. Mr. Unker is unsure when actual construction of a home will start on Parcel B and he would prefer to have utility assessments levied at the time of construction at rates in effect at that time. H. Mr. Unker has no objection to paying storm sewer assessments if he actually does have storm sewer constructed on the property, and in that event he would agree to assessments at the rates then in effect. If no storm sewer is constructed, he does not believe he should pay storm sewer assessments because the property will not benefit, and because the other parcels in Clearview Addition, including previous lot splits, have not been subject to such assessments. Based upon these comments, we would propose the following revised conditions: 4. Either a permanent and/or construction easement shall be obtained, if necessary, from Lot 9, or a county utility permit shall be obtained to allow construction of the required water service for the newly created lot. 5. A sanitary sewer service easement shall be dedicated over the southeast portion of Lot 10 as required to provide sanitary sewer service to the newly created parcel (west half) ,� 6. A drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated and a storm sewer outlet shall be constructed from the existing low drainage basin on the west side of Lot 10 to the Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north, or in the alternative, the property shall be filled and graded at the time of building construction, according to a grading plan acceptable to the City to provide natural storm water drainage into the pond to the north. q4 SCHEIDE, STAHNKE & SMITH, P.A. Page Three Planning and Engineering Departments March 6, 1987 7. A restrictive access control easement shall be dedicated to the County Highway Department across the entire frontage of Lot 10 with the exception of the existing driveway access location, with the allowed access to be up to 20 feet wide, subject to County approval. 9. Minimum floor elevation of the new house shall be established at 940.0, if a gravity line is installed. In the alternative, if a pumped line is installed, there shall be no minimum floor elevation. The sanitary sewer service construction shall be properly insulated. 10. A soils investigation report shall be prepared verifying adequate soils to accommodate a new building site, prior to construction. 11. This development shall be responsible for any outstanding, unlevied or deferred assessments or other financial obligations associated with this development at the rates in effect at the time of construction on Parcel B, with the exception of storm sewer assessments, which shall be payable only if a storm sewer line is constructed on Lot 10. 12. Sanitary sewer and water services shall be installed to the lot line at time of building construction. We would be most appreciative if you could give serious consideration to these proposed revisions. Very truly yours, Bradley th BS:kmb cc: James Unker 12 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: JAMES UNKER LOCATION: LOT 10, BLOCK 3, CLEARVIEW ADDITION SE 1/4 OF SECTION 29 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 26, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 13, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by James Unker of 1775 Cliff Road, requesting a waiver of plat in order to split Lot 10, Block 3, of the Clearview Addition into two separate parcels sharing a common access on the north side of Cliff Road, just east of Lenore Lane. Parcel A, containing the existing home will measure 188 feet x 280 feet (27,518 S.F.). Parcel B will measure 90 feet x 280 feet (25,200 S.F.). The applicant intends to build another single family home on Parcel B and has stated that he would not propose any additional splits in the future. An additional access to Lenore Lane and full platting requirements will be required if in the future the creation of another lot is desired. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer is available from the existing 8" lateral and manhole in the southeast corner of Lot 10. The elevation of this sanitary sewer requires a minimum basement floor elevation of 940.0 for any house constructed on Parcel B (west half of Lot 10). In order to provide service for Parcel B, an easement will have to be dedicated across Parcel A (east half of Lot 10). In addition, due to the minimuvlelevations and the existing topography of the property, this sewer service will have to be insulated as it crosses under the existing driveway presently servicing the existing i house on proposed Parcel A. The alignment of this sewer service should be directed through the existing opening in the grove of trees on this property. There ispresently an existing water service for the existing house on proposed Parcel A. A new water service will have to be installed ; to provide service to the newly created lot (Parcel B). Either a new water service will have to be bored underneath Cliff Road (no !� open cuts allowed), or an easement will have to'be acquired from Lot 9 on the west to allow connection to the existing water main.in Lenore Lane. Due to the complexities involved with either alternate, it is anticipated that this water service will be i relatively expensive. n� I, n 4 GRADING & DRAINAGE: There is presently a landlocked low drainage basin over the common lot line of existing Lots 9 and 10 of Block 3, Clearview Addition. This drainage basin presently serves the east one-third of Lot 9, the south two-thirds of Parcel B and the south one-third of Parcel A, and a small portion of Outlot B of Woodgate 2nd Addition to the east. If this Waiver is approved, a storm sewer outlet should be constructed for this drainage basin draining the outlet into the Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north and not into the existing storm sewer system along Cliff Road. STREETS/DRIVEWAYS: Cliff Road (County Road 32) is presently classified as a minor arterial. Subsegently, it is anticipated that the County will not allow an additional driveway access associated with this lot split. Therefore, it should be a condition of this Waiver that restricted access control be dedicated across the entire frontage of Lot 10 (both Parcels A and B) allowing only a singular driveway access at its present location to be shared by both lots. EASEMENTS/PERMITS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY: Sufficient right-of-way has been previously dedicated to accommodate the existing Cliff Road section. In addition, the County has retained a 25' construction easement across the south portion of Lot 10 to accommodate any potential future reconstruction activities that may be necessary. Either a permit from the County Highway Department or an easement from the owner of Lot 9 must be obtained prior to final approval providing for the accessibility of a new water service for the newly created lot. Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be acquired and/or dedicated to accommodate the storm water outlet from the existing low drainage basin presently existing along the west side of Lot 10 to the Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north. A sanitary sewer service easement shall be dedicated across the southeast corner of Lot 10 (Parcel A) to accommodate the sewer service extension to service Parcel B. A cross easement shall'be'executed providing for common use of the existing driveway for the newly created parcel and the existing house. ASSESSMENTS: Lot 10, Bloc), 3, of Clearvie; Addition was previously assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer and trunk area water main for its existing one lot use. i.ny subsequent suudivisions will have to pay the additional per lot ecu ivalent for these related trunl: area assessments. The entire front«ge of Lot 10 lnad been previously ilssesseUl for Cliff Road improvements. Therefore, no additional streat related assessments are associated with this propose(; split. 'I`runl; area storm sewer has not yet been levied over any of the lots within the Clearview Addition. T;zerefore, the entire area of Lot 10 is su'.Djeet to trunk area storm sewer assessments as a condition of this approval. Lateral benefit from existing water main will be rec;uired as a condition of approval to allow connection of tae additional grater service. All these assessment obligations are identified as follows: ITEIM QUANTITY IUj,TE A1,10M;_:T PROJECT t Trun:; Area Lianitar1� Sewer 1 L_ot $v25/Lot $025 c7J— I'runk Area 1�Fater Lain 1 Lot $600/Lot $6.00 17 Trunk Area Storm :,ec',er 52,000 sf $U.053/sr Y', 7--- ^?� I Lateral Benefit for 90 LF i Sanitary Sewer (Parcel "B")$30.12 $2,710.80 235 Latera1.Lenefit from Seater Xain 7U if $12.47 $1,122 2;5 QTAL $7,851.80 i Final assessr.ient obligations wi be base: on final quantities ane. rates in effect at t;ie. time of final waiver of platting approval. SOILS: Due to the existi_zr lol; drainage basin incorporating a major portion of tie proposes: newly creates: lot and the lir:itesa area for constructing a single-family house, it is strongly recommerdec: that a sciis investigation stu,ly be completed to ensue adequato fcuniation material exists for a new house. CONDITIONS JAMES QNKER: 1. All applicable Code requirements shall be adhered to. 2. Any further divisions of Lot 10 will require a replatting process. 3. This waiver shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 4. Either a permanent and construction easement shall be obtained from Lot 9 or a County utility permit shall be obtained to allow construction of the required water service for the newly created lot. 5. A sanitary sewer service easement shall' be dedicated over the southeast portion of Lot 10 as required to provide sanitary sewer service to the newly created parcel (west half). 6. A drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated and a storm sewer outlet shall be constructed from the existing low drainage basin on the west side of Lot 10 to the Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north. 7. A restrictive access control easement shall be dedicated to the County Highway Department across the entire frontage of Lot 10 with the exception of the existing driveway access location. 3. A cross easement shall be provided allowing common use of the existing driveway for both newly created parcels. >vY;.,9. Minimum floor elevation of the new house shall be established at 940.0, and the sanitary sewer service construction shall be properly insulated. 10. A soils investigation .report .shall be prepared verifying adequate soils to accommodate a new building site., 'll. This development shall be responsible for any outstanding, unlevied or deferred assessments or other financial obligations associated with this development at the rates in effect at the ' time of final approval. 4 12. Sanitary sewer and water services shall be installed to the " lot line of the newly created lot as a condition of approval. ? 9s RB y! It PK AI SIGMA S U RVEYI N G' Lot Division Certificate Fof: SERVICE Mr. JIM LINKER 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway ` Eagan. Minnesota 55122 Phone: (612) 452-3077 LU Z a J EA Sr 189.00 -, i 90. - `� �o�a , \ r 1 94. o - I PARCEL 'Ar 00 27,518 Sq.Ft. IW j I I PARCEL - Ox CO t �,-our �'•.,• I o N ® 25,200 Sq. Ft. , I ^ I a N m N" i•" N _ N1 Y s Z I 10.0 !' xJ y� psl - O I PP r /, Proposed ��� / �v :;—DRIVEWAYIJ I` lox in I—t!nL. �p9/ /! / / O? / EASEMENT LU i �i'P ISO- I . l ' t ...Zoo 00 .56 --#'--- �- E$1—_1875 ._ Pse lzs,z -:YISti.•� u•;+•i:,. s �'I •�r1: :3'.::.-:—.�.: .w .. � ti�-I .•.\i -1••e (CLIFF ROAD) C.S`A.H. No • � 11,50 - ' - .i J CJ is c.Z n 1 , MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING - EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA MARCH 24, 1987 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, March 24, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Hall, Members Gustafson, Voracek, Trygg, McCrea, Harrison and Krisnik. Also present were City Planner Dale Runkle, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch and Assistant City Attorney David Keller. AGENDA Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the agenda, noting that items A and B under Old Business shall be continued until the traffic study is completed. Chairman Hall asked the audience if anyone was present in regard to items A and B under old business. There was no response. The agenda was approved as changed. All voted yes. MINUTES Chairman Hall noted that the minutes from the February 24, 1987 regular meeting incorrectly indicated on pages 3 and 15, that he had made motions when in fact he was not present that evening. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the minutes with the corrections indicated. All voted in favor. Harrison moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend approval of the minutes for the February 26, 1987 regular meeting. All voted yea. WAIVER OF PLAT - JAMES UNKER Chairman Hall called the first public hearing of the evening in regard to the application of James Unker to split Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition into two separate 1/2 acre parcels abutting Cliff Road to the South and east of Lenore Lane in the southeast quarter of Section 29. Mr. Runkle gave a brief history of the proposal, which had been continued from the previous month's Advisory Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Foertsch briefly described the engineering issues and easements. Mr. Brad Smith, attorney for Mr. Unker, was present to respond. 1 APC Minutes March 24, 1987 Mr. Smith indicated that Mr. Unker could Com 1 conditions suggested by staff, and indicated that P n with the completed immediately but applicant would grading would be easements and hold up construction of until the location utilitiesefor theosecondvlot of the home was determined, and requested that any assessment for storm sewer be delayed until the remainder of the Clearview Addition was assessed. It applicant would like to keep open the was indicated that the splits, as there was a remote Possibility of part of the future lot Parcel with Mr. Amundson's parc`lotolcreate of fcul-de-sac from Lenore Lane. In response to Member McCrea's question regarding the timing of the levying of assessments, Mr. Colbert indicated that it had been City policy to bring assessments up development to prevent any surprisetoo adat` at the time of buyer. In response to member Voracek's question in regardtial tottile location of the utility lines, Mr. Foertsch indicated that again the policy was based on the desire to indicated that the extensiionsewould ct oonly lbe toal utheslot dli�ne and no Colbert affect the location of the home. t assessments, Mr. Colbert indicated that the regard to storm sewer Pond to the north of the Property did have a storm sewer outlet and the property had not been assessed in this regard. McCrea moved, Krisnik seconded the m otinrecommend of the waiver of plat, subject to the followingtconditions: approval 1. All applicable Code requirements shall be adhered to. 2• Any further divisions of Lot process. 10 will require a replatting 3. This waiver shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 4. Either a permanent and/or construction easement shall be obtained, if necessary, from Lot 9, or a county utility be obtained to allow construction of the required waterpermit servicehfor the newly created lot. 5. A sanitary sewer service easement shall be dedicated over the southeast portion of Lot 10 as required to sewer service to the newly created parcel provide sanitary (west half). 6. A drainage and utility easement storm sewer outlet shall be constructedshall frombethedicexistdingnlow drainage basin on the west side of Lot 10 to the Woodgate Pond (BP_ 22) to the north. /63 K APC Minutes March 24, 1987 d to 7. A restrictive access °ntrol acrossethe1nentirent hafrontagebe dofaLoa 10 the County Highway Department with the exception of the existing driveway access location. B. A cross easement shall be provided allowing common use of the existing driveway for both newly created parcels. e shall be 9. Minimum floor elevaesanitary s lhwerservice new sconstruction established at 940.0, and to shall be properly insulated. 10. A soil investigation report shall be prepared verifying adequate soils to accommodate a new building site. 11. This development shall be responsible for any outstanding, ligions unlevied or deferredassesn t the ratesother or financial b ineffectattheattime associated with this development of final approval. shall be installed 12. Sanitary sewer and water seras alcondition of approvals to the lot line of the newly created All voted in favor, except Harrison who voted against. OVERVIEW 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT public hearing of the evening convened by Chairman The second p ng Hall was in regard to the application of Dunn Real Estate for a preliminary plat consisting of one .98 acre lot on Oust°north Overview Estates RRoadt located °Plannerthe `sDale d Runklee of introducedthe of Golden Meadowparcel proposal, which was to pent left this oas sane outlot lfoor opotential family lot, which had be combination with adjacent property for development. Mr. Runkla aring indicated that neighbors Ed Dunnaexpressed was presentand answered questions. neighborhood park. Mr. Ed Ms. Deb Schad of 4332 Stirrup Street appeared and distributed a letter drafted on behalf °� neighbor in 1731egGolden to tMeadowosRoadn for a local park. Mr. Ric which Mr. Runkle indicated was for one questioned the type of use single family home. In response to Chairman Hall's question, Mr. vie Runkle indicated that the Park Commission would reHarrison rmoved, subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting- roya Gustafson seconded of the the motion to recommend app preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. .2. Driveway access onto Dodd Road shall be allowed. /D 3 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six PRELIMINARY PLAT OVERVIEW 2ND ADDITION I. Preliminary Plat for Overview 2nd Addition Consisting of a .98 Acre Lot Located on the West Side of Dodd Road, North of Golden Meadow Road --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at the March 24, 1987 meeting, to consider an application submitted by Dunn Real Estate for a preliminary plat entitled Overview 2nd Addition. This plat consists of a .98 acre lot on Outlot A of Overview Estates Replat. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information on t is item, ref r to the staff report, a copy is enclosed on pages through. A letter was sent to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and Parks and Recreation -Director b�4. sidents of this area, a copy is enclosed on pages J �/ throughThis letter is suggesting that the City acquire and develop.98 acre parcel, proposed as Overview 2nd Addition, for City park land. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission met on Thursday, April 2, 1987 and reviewed the neighborhood request and is recommending to the City Council that the land not be purchased or developed for park land purposes. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled Overview 2nd Addition. R •�l CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: DUNN REAL ESTATE LOCATION: NA SECTION 25 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (WITHIN LEXINGTON SOUTH PD) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Prelim- inary Plat for the Overview 2nd Addition. This plat consists of one .98 acre lot on Outlot A, Overview Estates Replat. This site is lo- cated on the west side of Dodd Road just north of Golden Meadow Road. The area to the west and south is R-1 (Overview Estates Replat) and the R-1 (Haeg Addition) Outlot is to the north. That plat, approved in July 1985, called for 8 single family lots on approximately five acres - built-in 2 phases. The first phase was for 4 lots abutting Hackmore Drive on the north and an Outlot (Phase 2) on the south. A condition of approval stated that the driveway entrances for Phase 2 shall be constructed so that lots l and 2 have a common driveway and lots 3 and 4 have a common driveway to Dodd Road. The subject lot has 130 feet of frontage where the 4 proposed lots in the Haeg Add- ition are 91 feet wide. The land is open and falls gently to the � xF= ;`s> '_ northwest. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water service stubs have been provided to the property line of this proposed lot. The service stubs are of sufficient size and depth to provide adequate -service to the lot. GRADING AND DRAINAGE: The,lot currently drains to the northwest across the existing residential development abutting the west side of the lot, and then to the existing catch basins on Stirrup Street. The proposed development offers no adverse affect to the existing drainage patterns. The limited amount of extra storm water runoff that will be generated from the addition of one: single family house is not significant. STREETS/DRAINAGE: The proposed lot will have its driveway access onto Dodd Road and this access should be allowed. Dodd Road is -on the City's municipal state aid street system but has not been upgraded to state aid standards. Dodd Road is currently a 34 ft. wide street with bituminous curb. In the future, . it wi 11 be upgraded to a 44 ft. wide street with concrete curb and gutter. The abutting properties along Dodd Road will be assessed for the improvements to the street. Municipal state aid funds will also be used to pay for a portion of ;he'upgrading of Dodd Road. s a EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAYS: The appropriate common side and rear lot line drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated. A 50 ft. half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd Road. ASSESSMENTS: The property proposed to be platted under this application was assessed for the following improvements: PROJECT # DESCRIPTION USAGE 241 Dodd Road (Restoration) S.F. 278A Water Area S.F. 278A Sanitary Sewer Trunk S.F. 278A Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. There are no pending assessments against the property. The following are the proposed assessments for this plat: Proj. # Description Usage Rate Quantity Amt. 241 Dodd Rd. Upgrade S.F.* 8.70/F.F. 130.75 F.F. $1,138 241 Water Lateral Benefit S.F. 12.47/F.F. 130.75 F.F. 1,630 Trailways 12.40/F.F. 130.75 F.F. 1,620 Total $4,388 *Prorata increase of Dodd Road to residential equivalent. All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the final quantities contained in the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. CONDITIONS: OVERVIEW 1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 2. Driveway access onto Dodd Road shall be allowed. 3. Appropriate common side and rear lot line easements shall be dedicated for Dodd Road. 4. A 50 ft. half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd Road. 5. This lot shall be subject to a Parks Dedication Fee. /07 C-YVT.—Y IVv— #-tp/r 4 16 I I J 3lk 4 sit, a�E 4MY$ A •� I_ F— 90 — I i !o -T •I r— 90 — t— -i30 — -� •ap 1 A4 'T 1QQ t F- �: 3vh z p Sco vz W wIr ¢° fo 3 j ' Seo. ar .. . ••�' 1 � 6 ovTtor q I � I i 10 ?reliminary Plat: OVERVIEW SECOND ADDITION Sheet 1 of 2 F- 40 --� '-iA IE' %,'3 FI RS ;_ AD411Y10N' 329.89 N 69°46'05E e= W I 'W to (D LOT I ,,� M . CO i I 90 N 0-- N" 5 BLOC K I b J , to j �_ _ _ (D— — 312.36 N8 11284E ' 1 0 V E- R 1'1:-W ,_ T AT E., gEF'LAT STREET ASSESSMENT UPGRADE 130.75' TRAILWAY 130.75' GOLDEN MEADOW ROAD Preliminary Plat: OVERVIEW SECOND ADDITI N' Fee Owner: Dunn Real Estate Management Inc. 4194 Knob Circle Eagan, MN 55122 Tel. 452-1561 Legal Description: Outlot A, OVERVIEW ESTTAES REPLAT, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. Zoning: R-1, Single Family Residential Notes: 1)Lot has existing sanitary sewer and water stubed to property. 2) Contains 41,740 square feet. Date of Preparation: February 10, 1987 Preliminary Plat: nVF.RVfEW SECOND ADDITION .0 :tj w, L -= 329.89 N89°46'05�E L 0 T 0- 5 BLOCK — — 312.361 N 89°}41 28 E ' ri V rL---R E -W i ,_TATS REPLAT GOLDEN MEADOW ROAD Preliminary Plat: Fee Owner: 1 40 t WATER LATERAL BENEFFT 130.75' OVERVIEW SECOND ADDITI N' Dunn Real Estate Management Inc. 4194 Knob Circle Eagan, MN 55122 Tel. 452-1561 Legal Description: Outlot A, OVERVIEW ESTTAES REPLAT, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. Zoning: R-1, Single Family Residential Notes: 1)Lot has existing sanitary sewer and water stubed to property. 2) Contains 41,740 square feet. Date of Preparation: February 10, 1987 /�D 12" 72 750.4/67.0 38.4/56.0 1 :1:19) 54.6/ 71.0 611 0 53.1 /68.0 t. 50.3/67.0 117 53.7/M0 P A I Al i`2' :t�78) 51.4/65.0 18.4/29.0 i::i i 116 66.7/85.0 180 :D. 53.! 9N QAO- 6 M.G. GROUND STORAGE 5000 G.P.M. BOOSTER H.W.L. 1059 42.2/58. 183 0 182 183 24 68.0/ 7210, 2011 120 187 39.0J54 9 H tL 30 12" 1�184 68.7/ 74.0 4 185 1 85.2 /95.0 1818 UL;,, 51000. NO. 42 74.4/82.0 16e 84.5/95.0 ......... 189D 1211 20" 0 70.8/76. d7 16" 1 45.6/58.0 12 2011 -26 r02 0 ... .... .. . ............. .. - (203) 43,3/58.0 884/9§0 .d- 20295 �7 74.6/170 1 4 2 47.5/63.0 50.6/66.0 OVERVIEW 9 3.7/ 104 a: 16 OVERHIL.L:.. 2nd ADD. SUBJECT PARCEL ................. o 83.3,95.0 1.91 FIG. +3 city of eaganapproved: standard . WATER plate #: PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT� 41t I I I a March 18, 1987 Roger Martin, Chairman Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Ken Vraa, Director Parks & Recreation Department City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Sirs: We, the members of the community residing in or near the development known as Overview Estates wish to submit a proposal to the Parks & Recreation Department. The parcel of land consisting of approximately .98 acre located on the west side of Dodd. Road and just north of Golden Meadow Road is now a vacant lot. We have been given notice that a Public Hearing is scheduled for March 24, 1987 for consideration of an application submitted by Dunn Real Estate for this parcel of land. We would propose that the above-described vacant lot be utilized for a community park. Our development currently lacks a park and recreation area for the many children in our neighborhood. The map issued by the City of Eagan for calendar year 1987 locates the forty existing park sites in the city. According to this map, there are three parks x' within one mile of Overview Estates. Of these three #32 South Oaks and #33 Lakeside are approximately one-half mile from Overview Estates. These two parks are inaccessible to children as they are on the east side of heavily traveled Dodd Road. The remaining park #31 Trapp Farm is also approximately one-half mile away. This park is only accessible by way of Wilderness Run Road. Therefore, children would have to travel along Dodd Road. It should be noted that in computing the above distances, they were measured "as the crow flies", not the actual distance which would. have to be traveled for access. In conclusion, we support the proposal for an area park in our neighborhood and ask that you give this matter your sincere consideration. /12--- RTrMQ" RF. AnnRFns 97- /7s�-73s3 I! `! L 45-x- ai l J-- -bct 33 *5-t,o-S63 S' j?J, 4-5a-9-7-� zlS-�l - ,-7" if ��✓,.�,. 4- ,% M.A�1 e A -135 ooldtn #Lea cf cv 4,fi - 76 oolk, 9-s'6-S`6s�s f 43q,-2- R-P-�tP-z C,4 4 5: IB5 SIGNATURE p r 1-11A , , U0, 11" 0— v 0, W�,� I �ld - ADDRESS 9,xs2. 5yLirr up -9-. 1/3Z)oI,- / /J-- � 912, F- 1 vx4c-, (I � e1:5-2 -�9 TO If 52 --&/ 21 4�z-- '!S70-73 y5Y— u/Z Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/FLOUR BIN IST ADDITION J. Conditional Use Permit for a Drive-Thru Facility, Pylon Sign and Beer Sales, Located in Lot 2, Block 1, Flour Bin 1st Addition --A public hearing was held at the March 24, 1987, APC meeting to consider an application submitted for a conditional use permit to allow a drive-thru facility, pylon sign and 3.2 beer sales for a Rocky Rococo Pizza restaurant. The application was submitted by the Madison Pizza Corporation and is being recommended for approval by the APC. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Departments' report, a copy is enclosed on pages_yly,_ through --L for your review. For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to those minutes enclosed on page (s) _x/2,3 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for Madison Pizza to provide a Rocky Rococo Pizza restaurant, pylon sign, drive-through facility and 3.2 beer sales on Lot 2, Block 1, Flour Bin 1st Addition. //_5 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MADISON PIZZA LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, FLOUR BIN FIRST ADDITION: EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a cond- itional use permit for a drive-thru facility, pylon sign and 3.2 beer sales for a Rocky Rococo Pizza restaurant. The site, Lot 2, Block 1, Flour Bin First Addition was previously approved for a Burger King restaurant when recorded in June 1986. Flour Bin is to the west and undeveloped LB land is to the east. Agriculturally zoned single family lots are to the south. SITE PLAN: This 1.4 acre lot is served by 'right in/ right, out entry drives with a concrete median onto Cliff Road and by the full access onto Nicols Road thru the Flour Bin site. With either one,_ the drive thru facility will not pass thru a parking area. Ample stacking for eight cars is provided. The "middle" concrete median is to be removed so that the parking stalls on the west side of the -,f:=:>>s;•n'. building have easier access. All 39 stalls are ten feet wide, 33 are required for this 99 seat restaurant. Additional parking can be provided on the southern portion of the site if building expan- sion were to occur.. All setbacks meet Code requirements. The trash enclosure has been moved closer to the building and must meet the structural requirements of the Fire Marshall. A prelim- inary landscape plan was also submitted and will need to be upgraded to meet the current city standards. The applicant is in the process of working with a local landscape architect to ensure proper plant material selection and placement. SIGNAGE: A pylon sign has been proposed in the northeastern corner of the site, within the setback requirements. However, the proposed contains 293 sq. ft. per side and is 40 feet tall. Code allows 125 sq. ft. per side and a 27 foot maximum height. The distance to the Flour Bin sign is approximately 280 feet - 300 feet is the typical spacing requirement for pylon signs on the same side of the street. If approvedlstaff recommends the maximum height match that of the -Flour -,Bin sign.- 114 w UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size, capacity and depth is available and has been stubbed to this development. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL: The property in its present state is generally flat and covered with weeds. A majority of the site was disturbed when the adjacent development to the west was built. The grading plan proposes to drain the site to two existing catch basins and to one new catch basin in the center of the site. All three -catch basins will be drained by an existing 15" storm sewer line that connects to an existing 42" storm sewer along the east propety line of the development. The 42" storm sewer line eventually empties into Pond AP -9. The existing storm sewer facilities that drain this development are adequate and they are designed to serve this development. Erosion/ sediment control practices designed to contain sediment on site shall be installed and functional before any grading begins. The developer shall be responsible for maintaining the erosion control measures until the bitumious parking lots have been constructed. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed development from the north will be from Cliff Road, a four -lane divided roadway. This access was constructed when the adjacent development to the west was constructed. The Cliff Road access is a right -in and right -out. Access to the proposed development from the west will be through the south end of the Flour Bin development to Nicols Road. Nicols Road is currently being upgraded to a 44 ft. wide urban design roadway. The Nicols Road access will allow traffic to enter the development from all directions. Also, the Nicols Road/Cliff Road intersection is signalized. The two accesses that will serve this development, plus the adjacent Flour Bin Restaurant access, should be adequate. The demand at either driveway should be minimal. In order to improve the circulation to this development, an existing concrete median is proposed to be be removed and replaced with new bituminous and striping. The other two concrete medians that separate the incoming traffic from the outgoing traffic shall remain. The concrete median that will be removed will allow the incoming traffic from Cliff Road to turn into the proposed parking areas along the north and west side of the proposed Ricky Rococo Restaurant. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAYS/PERMITS: All appropriate utility easements shall be provided in accordance with City standards prior to isuance of a building permit. The final layout plan should be submitted to the Dakota County Highway Department to allow them to review the proposed improvements along Cliff Road. //7 CONDITIONS: 1. The pylon sign shall contain a maximum 125 sq. ft. per side and be no taller than the Flour Bin sign. 2. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted prior to the build- ing permit application. A financial guarantee shall be included and not released until after 1 year from the installation date. /a 1 - ♦IM100 alOiO as a -x-. �7 a1Ma.win'xwal LY61 •CI TI►1' .L.f. ,OZ •.1 'TADS. xmawm 'ul ,a+ou•.aun ....w•Ico.•..c, d l'3 d13- NVId lfandO13AM = Ki ��•aY./nn w. .,.. , laQYaa.i . ��M 10•Ta •L•lai 1».YIM . 4. L11.. Aal f.(¢, n at• �' � O fY7w9M3 9MlRC110� SNO{SIA3a '0l1 a9NIa33N19N37LLSIHH08VW � — Yy C II I , - _ , 1'I 3a2gE? A- �if .w` W Z e7C7 Y ...>cr Z w. I , •.... rar. I �� O H-.! Ac Q �ei:@e Q ago i 1 N A'r ie rl I' 8 I Y 6•: ' / 1' i LU YI g R: �.Y �( i=: •o Iri V fjA e3. � ,� . p•� I •\.\1 I K W» �• l T YII ��4 _ IOW =1; �•' I Ei li 4Yj. sl I :mc va-.I Mr gem � I Y9 Y� �'-.. � '�tiaw• �� I.' 1 { e• I I 1 I r cadoa N 'Hb'S'� —�-1--- ---- W JLLI --- �_ o R h 17=0" /1'- 3d CEMlr � In CE CCR., (Z� It' x IZ'x 395w 5Q. 'WR/ / To SE oXFo" KoWm +/0' IW Oz IT O MAIN PY•L(i! 1 `iIUk) FACE 17ECDS-kZ10N Ah liFerlIPIEV — ASC' LA -C7r- "A" EXTv-IJ'i101a CM, ACRYLIC, FPALE4-) CA61NET 19 IIV" PL -F -P 4.r TO VE OU -MV 0-OWA1 OV70WT CF-KTAQ. Fm -Ey /,R,s 3/ib• AGRzf LIC WITH I" PILLOW 41 IV' EHVWlMC-, 'APIC' TYPE I EX'UNTION 10" PEE -IN CABINET TO 2•E OXF0V0 vPDWI.I/WITI �.-j 111 FLAT LEXAr1 FACOy /(5) LINF`r �Wwo**s OF W SLIP -IN REAPU-"APP —� t4AWLE . I3/�'I PLATE y�c. f Z It f ELECTPJCAL Ua. HNIM I.P. 7.7.fi-ANIS. tiEADFr•" — W 1TH 14 ) 4,-0' A 1?/4' AIJ(FIOV_ 30LT6i VE& HOLf- IELEUMMNL CONVU11Ab, rEQ. f ELECTPJCAL Ua. HNIM I.P. 7.7.fi-ANIS. tiEADFr•" a t------- - CT I APC Minutes March 24, 1987 3. Appropriate common side and rear lot line easements shall be dedicated for Dodd Road. 4. A 50 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd Road. 5. This lot shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 6. All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the final quantities contained in the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. All voted yea. The Commission directed staff to advise the Advisory Park Commission of the neighbor's request. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - MADISON PIZZA LOT 2, BLOCK 1, FLOUR BIN FIRST ADDITION Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Madison Pizza requesting conditional use permits for a drive-through facility, pylon sign and 3.2 beer sales for a Rocky Rococo Pizza Restaurant on Lot 2, Block 1, Flour Bin First Addition. City Planner Runkle indicated that the proposal complied with the previously anticipated use for a Burger King restaurant. The main issue of concern was the request for a 293 square foot pylon sign. Mr. Dan Rooney appeared on behalf of Madison Pizza and indicated that the applicant found the staff conditions acceptable, including the limitation of 125 square feet of signage for the pylon sign. Mr. Linkert of 4640 Nicols Road, appeared and expressed his belief that a fence was to have been constructed along the back side of this property to allow some privacy for his single family home. Mr. Runkle indicated he would review the conditions of the original plat prior to the next City Council meeting. Mr. Runkle indicated that the proposed sign was 280 feet from the existing Flour Bin sign. Harrison moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for drive-through facility and 3.2 beer sales, subject to the condition that a revised landscape plan shall be submitted prior to the building permit application. The financial guarantee shall be included and not released until one year from the installation date. Staff shall.review the requirement for a fence, and enforce if such a requirement exists. All voted in favor. Harrison moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign to contain a maximum of 125 square feet per side of signage and no taller than the Flour Bin sign. All voted yes except McCrea who voted nay, on the basis that the sign should meet code spacing requirements. t z-3 ,i Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight WAIVER OF PLAT/KILLDEER ADDITION K. Waiver of Plat in Order to Split Lot 4, Block 1, of the Killdeer Addition for Separate Ownership in an NB District --A public hearing was held on March 24 at the APC meeting to consider an application submitted by Joyce and Rueben Miessner requesting a waiver of plat in order to split Lot 4, Block 1, of the Killdeer Addition for separate ownership. The APC is recommending approval of the lot split. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages 41� through_13L. For a copy of the AFC minutes on this item, refer to pages ^/33 through 13 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for Joyce and Rueben Miessner, referred to as a lot split for Lot 4, Block 1, Killdeer Addition. F CITY OF EAGAN -SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: JOYCE AND RUEBEN MEISSNER LOCATION: LOT 4, BLOCK 1, KILLDEER ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 10, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lot 4, Block 1, of the Killdeer Addition for seperate ownership. This(NB)Neighborhood Business zoned lot is located along the east side of Hwy. 149 just south -of Hwy. 55. COMMENTS: Lots 4 and 5 contain 59,480 sq. ft. and 33,780 sq. ft. respectively. The division of Lot 4 will create 2 parcels; A) 42,830 square feet and B) 16,650 square feet. '.Currently there is a single family home owned by the Meissner's sons on proposed Parcel "B". The new lot line will not effect setback requirements in any way. That house will remain a non conforming use within a NB district. Lot 5 to the south contains a T.V. repair shop operated by the Meissner's sons. The lot to the north is the recently improved Skelly Service '=,;';;.;, Station. A single access for parcels A, B, and Lot 5 will be prov- ided from Hwy. 149. GRADING/DRAINAGE: Parcel A in its present state is lowerthanthe '.�. surrounding developed properties.. The site contains a dense grass is cover with numerous 1" - 2" trees. The drainage ditch along the east side of S.T.H. 149 drains to the low area on Parcel A. The high point on the ditch system to the south is at Chapel Lane. The south half of the Texaco Gas Station on the north side of Parcel A also drains to the low area on Parcel A. Currently,,the storm water runoff from the highway ditch drains across Parcel A and then to the north across the residential properties to the Highway 55 frontage road ditch system. If Parcel A develops, the lot will need to be filled to around elevation 864, which will match the elevations of the surrounding properties. Also, it is strongly recommended that a soils investigation study be completed to determine the amount of organic material that will have to be removed prior to the filling of the lot. If Parcel A develops, the natural drainage that crosses through this lot must be allowed to continue. The storm water runoff from the drainage ditch along S.T.H. 149 should be intercepted by a gravity storm sewer system that would convey the runoff from the ditch along S.T.H. 149 to the north and to the east and connect to the existing storm sewer system at Joyce Court and Highway 55. The new storm sewer system should be designed to convey approximately 16 c.f.s. as it crosses Parcel A. If Parcel A is improved, the developer shall submit a detailed grading, drainage, and erosion control plan to the City for their review. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service is available to Parcel A from the existing 9" V.C.P. sanitary sewer line that flows northerly through the east side of the property. If Parcel A develops, then the new development would have to connect directly to the existing 9" line. There are no service stubs provided to the proposed Parcel A. A new water service will have to be installed to provide service to the newly created lot (Parcel A). The new water service should connect directly to the existing 8" water main on the east side of the S.T.H. 149. There is presently an existing water service for the existing house on Parcel B. Depending on the location of the existing water service for Parcel B in relationship to the proposed development on Parcel A, the water service line might have to be relocated. If Parcel A develops and the lot is filled, then the existing sanitary sewer manhole shall be reconstructed to accommodate the new grade. Also, if fill is added over the existing 9" sanitary sewer, then the City would need to evaluate if the additional loading on the clay pipe would be acceptable. A detailed sanitary sewer and water service layout shall be submitted to the City for their review when Parcel A develops. STREETS/DRIVEWAYS/ACCESS: 'The proposed Parcel A can be adequately served with street access from S.T.H. 149, along the west property line of the parcel. S.T.H: 149 is a two-lane rural section roadway under the jurisdiction of MnDot. At this time, there has not been a schedule established for upgrading S.T.H. 149 to a four -lane urban roadway with storm sewer. S.T.H. 149 is a controlled access roadway in this area according to Mr. Don Fashant of the Permit Section of Mn Dot. Therefore, no new accesses will be permitted onto S.T.H. 149.- Parcel A will have to use the existing access that connects to S.T.H. 149 at the south property line of Lot 4 of Block 1 of the Killdeer Addition. Therefore, it shall be a condition of this report that restricted. access control shall be dedicated across the entire frontage of Parcels A and B of Lot 4 and Lot 5 allowing only a singular driveway access at its present location to be shared by all three parcels. The existing common driveway opening shall be upgraded to a 32 ft. wide entrance with 30 ft. turning radii. �2� EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Easements shall be dedicated across Parcel A for the sanitary sewer and water services for Parcel B. A maintenance agreement shall be executed providing for the common use of the existing driveway between Parcels A and B of Lot 4 and Lot 5. Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated to accommodate the future storm sewer system from the drainage ditch along S.T.H. 149 to the north end of the storm sewer system. Sufficient right-of-way has been dedicated for S.T.H. 149. If Parcel A develops, then a preliminary layout plan should be submitted to MnDot as soon as possible to allow them to review the proposed improvements and provide comments. ASSESSMENTS: Lot 4, Block 1, Killdeer Addition was previously assessed as follows: Project # _Type Usage 49 Sanitary Sewer Trunk - -� 49 Water Lateral S.F. 49 Water Area C/I 182 Storm Sewer Trunk C/I There are presently no pending assessments. Proposed assessments: Project # Usage Description Rate Quantity 49 C/I * Water Lateral Benefit $8.08/F.F. 215.71 F.F. -*.T.H. 49 C/I Street 92.76/F.F. 215.71 F.F. Assessment $1,743 20,009 Total $21,752 * The original assessment was not at a lateral benefit rate, however, it is part of the trunk system. Therefore, the proposed assessment is at the upgrade rate. P-7 CONDITIONS: KILLDEER ADDITION 1. All applicable Code requirements shall be adhered to. 2. A soils investigation report shallbe prepared to verify existing soil conditions prior to construction on Parcel A. 3. Prior to development on Parcel A, adequate storm sewer shall be constructed. Storm sewer construction shall be subject to approval by MnDot as well as the City of Eagan. 4. Sanitary sewer and water service easements shall be provided across Parcel A to serve Parcel B. 5. The developer of Parcel A shall submit an appropriate grading, drainage and erosion control plan prior to improvement. 6. Restricted access control shall be dedicated across the entire frontage of Lots 4 and 5. 7. A 50ft.x 50 ft. driveway easement shall be provided for access off S.T.H. 149. 8. As a condition of commercial development on Parcel A, the existing drive which serves the two existing houses shall be upgraded to a 28 ft. wide bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter. 9. The existing common driveway opening shall be upgraded to a 32 ft. wide entrance with 30 ft. radii. 10. Appropriate drainage and utility easements to accommodate future storm sewer. ll.All NB building and parking setbacks shall be maintained for parcel "A" when developed. Proposed waiver of platting for: y1 Rev. Reuben F. Meissner �\\ 384.88 S 89°53' 23"E 294.88 0.0 90 -Mg. 90.00 r -- SANITARY SEwa 1 w EASEMENT rt \I DOC. NQ spa O �� ¢��V 4 w I g, 1 ; 0 0 172.25 I I I- I �By6'^� ��7_2 5 1.30 S89°53' 23 E -Pr\ ac°rosde utility easement Q� Proposed cross access easement A utility easement will be provided for the house on Parcel B along the route of the existing line to the sanitary sewer easement on Parcel A. *► WATER LATERAL UPGRADE 215.71' PROPOSED DESCRIPTION PARCEL A Lot 4, Block I., KILLDEER ADDITION, according to -the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, Except the East 90.00 feet thereof. Also except the South 15.00 feet of said Lot 4, lying west of the East 90.00 feet. PROPOSED DESCRIPTION PACEL B The East 90.00 feet of Lot 4 and the South 15.00 feet of said Lot 4 lying west of the East 90.00 feet thereof. All in Block 1, KILLDEER ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. 13 12 57.4 / 8,5.0 \�I L 18 43.3/7Q.0 16u;......._ 1 \ _ r r_c,;;ArvUacE CuTEn {�\\. 55.8/800 7/78:0 „ 57~§ 53. 82.071.2\f.9 O 12 •,8 16 $ i_O 45 16 nIC,IROA 14' 12 16 60.x/82.0 1 EA( Ni A' � ? --u rT �i2 56 op/8?0 � 1 I 51.2/ 760 67.5/91.0 67.0(Q9. �• , 7�7 � 49.7/74.0.: � '-----_. s - 1 t `. "(8 , r\, 51 ,52.3177.Q 1. - i - �\ .... — PARK w f 49I ' 4 16n L7 \\ ` 24' LI _-_ )l Tri DEENY .4 18" 112" �12 ° -/- IIt ,71hiY1 Ta . 8 65 51.4/72-0 \ 58 _ _•_} � 4- 16" 6 56.4/76.0 Za/ss.o� 61.5/80.0 i 676/86.0 49.6/66.07.5/43-0 20"- ----- -- j GD I8" ' 18" I 20 64 2d 63 24" Q6J2 _241 -GOPHEF1 EAGA.*g 67 66 8° 24' 60. PARK TU`t:lAR �53.6/p2.0 sl ��eggTT 6 ;ILLS 48.9/66.0• 10 M.G. ;Cu11lCN LVESCOTT ROUND STORAGE \\ CARRIAGE I - H.W.L. 1059 18° I HILLS'.GREN -- COURSE II G;;RDEN I LQTS 'CAGE `� K�7F city of eagan MLE� PUBLIC WORKS co CY -�� DEPARTME MEISSNER PROPERTY SUBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN I '7-..,- 0 j FIG. #3 approved - standard plate #: - APC Minutes March 24, 1987 WAIVER OF PLAT - LOT 4, BLOCK 1, KILLDEER ADDITION JOYCE & RUEBEN MEISSNER The public hearing in regard to the application of Joyce and Rueben Meissner for waiver of plat in order to split Lot 4, Block 1, Killdeer Addition, was then convened by Chairman Hall. Mr. Runkle described the proposal which consisted of a Neighborhood Business zoned lot located on the east side of Highway #149 just south of Highway #55. The request was to allow the development of the front portion of the lot while the rear portion would obtain access for a single family home. Mr. Runkle indicated that the City would hold the waiver of plat resolution until development did occur and all conditions were complied with. Mr. Mike Wills, part owner of the proposed single family lot, and son of Joyce Meissner, was present to respond to questions. It was noted that a variance from the 50 foot public street access requirement was necessary, and that a 15 foot easement was necessary from the lot adjacent to the south, which contained a T.V. Repair business also operated by the Wills. Hall moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat with variance for street frontage, subject to the following conditions: 1. All applicable code requirements shall be adhered to. 2. A soil investigation report shall be prepared to verify existing soil conditions prior to construction on Parcel A. 3. Prior to approval of the waiver of plat,, adequate storm sewer shall be constructed. Storm sewer construction shall be subject to approval by MnDOT as well as the City of Eagan. 4. Sanitary sewer and service easements shall be provided across Parcel A to serve Parcel B. 5. The developer of Parcel A shall submit an appropriate grading, drainage and erosion control plan prior to improvement. 6. Restricted access control shall be dedicated across the entire frontage of Lots 4 and 5. 7. A 50 foot by 50 foot driveway easement shall be provided for access off S.T.H. #149. 8. Prior to the approval of the waiver of plat, the existing driveway which serves the two existing houses shall be upgraded to a 28 foot wide bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter. 2 5 APC Minutes March 24, 1987 9. The existing common driveway opening shall be upgraded to a 32 foot wide entrance with 30 feet radii. 10. Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall accommodate future storm sewer. 11. All NB building and parking setbacks shall be maintained for Parcel A when developed. 12. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining a 15 foot driveway easement from Lot 5 to the south. All voted yes. MUELLER SCHOOL - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Independent School District #196 for rezoning of 28.43 acres to Public Facilities Park designation, and a preliminary plat for an elementary school located on the north side of Wescott Road, east of Lexington Avenue, in the southeast quarter of Section 14. Dale Runkle indicated that the Land Use Map had designated the area as P/E (Parks & Elementary) and therefore, a Comprehensive Guide Amendment was not necessary. Mr. Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation, was present to respond to any questions in regard to the park area use. There was no one present from the public. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning from A (Agricultural) to PF (Public Facilities). All voted yes. Harrison moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standards plat conditions shall apply. 2. All land swaps between the City and School District shall be completed prior to final plat. 3. All necessary ponding easements shall be provided to the H'4L as outlined above. 4. Utility easements necessary to extend storm sewers from the proposed Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Addition shall be provided. 5. The required permit from the DNR shall be secured prior to work on Pond JP -32. 6. Storm sewer constructed across the Williams Pipeline shall be coordinated with Williams Pipeline Company. /3� Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/WESCOTT SCHOOL SITE L. Rezoning for Mueller School Site (ISD #196) of 28.43 Acres to a Public Facility Park Designation, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Preliminary Plat for an Elementary School Located on Wescott Road --A public hearing was held by the APC at their regular meeting held on March 24 to consider two (2) applications submitted by Independent School District #196 requesting a rezoning of 28.43 acres from agricultural to public facility and a preliminary plat for the Mueller School Addition. The comprehensive guide plan redesignated the side as parks for parks and elementary, therefore, no comp guide plan amendment will be required. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to a report prepared by the Planning and Engineering Departments found on pages Zvi through 14tZ.-. For additional information and action that was taken by t e APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s) / 3 •! / ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) rezoning of 28.43 acres from A to PF and 2) the preliminary plat entitled Mueller School. /35 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT (MUELLER SCHOOL) APPLICANT: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196 LOCATION: SE4 SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS: Two seperate applications have been submitted by Independent School District 196 requesting a rezoning of 28.43 A (Agricultural) acres to a PF (Public Facilities) district and a pre- liminary plat for the Mueller School Addition. The November 1986 Land Use Map designates this area P/E (Parks & Elementary), therefore no Amendment will be necessary. The site is located east of the Greensboro Addition, west and south of the Sunrise Hills Addition and abutts Wescott Road.on the south. CODE COMPLIANCE / SITE PLANNING: This site is dominated by 3 large ponding areas and a dense hardwood zone in the northwestern -most portion of the proposed .park. The Williams Brothers Pipeline Ease- ment crosses through that area and will not be affected by this plat. The City will enter a joint usage agreement to develop the 28.43 acres. The City will own 10 acres and ISD 196 18.43 acres. Basically, the responsibility of the City will be for the design, construction, coordination, and maintenance of the recreation areas. ISD 196 will have jurisdiction of the entire property during the regular school year and during summer school.sessions. They will also pay for.their share of customary recreational facilities. - A land exchange between the developers of Sunrise Hills and the school district will provide more athletic field area in exchange for need single family lots in exchange for needed single family lot areas. This agreement will be finalized prior to the final plat submission. (See Exhibit) A looped vehicular access from Wescott will serve this site. Ped- estrian Easements connecting to the Greensboro and Sunrise Hills Additions -will be provided. A secondary bus loading/ handicapped parking area is on the south side of the school. The building foot- print is almost identical to Deerwood School._ Only small detailing changes will occur. That school was built to accomodate approximately 700 students in grades K-5. It is anticipated that this school will open in the -fall -of 1988. - There will be 104 parking stalls at a nine foot width provided - 25 more than the Deerwood site and should be sufficient for potential joint usage. The City's Park Planner will provide the landscape plan for the entire site. /?J!o 4a _ WESCOTT ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADING/DRAINAGE: The site incorporates rolling topography and 4 wetlands. The southerly and easterly portion of the site drains into Pond JP -31 and the pond directly abutting Wescott Road. The pond abutting Wescott Road is not designated as a pond in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan, however, it is in- tended to be preserved as a pond with this development and will receive storm water runoff from the adjacent parking lots. Therefore, this pond will be in- corporated into the Eagan Storm Sewer System and pond easement will have to be provided to the HWL. The controlled outlet for this pond _will be provided by proposed storm sewers constructed in Wescott Road. Pond JP -31 located north- easterly of the previously mentioned pond will receive runoff from the adja- cent parking lot, the ballfields located to the north, and the proposed Sun- rise Hills and Woodland Addition. The controlled outlet for this pond will be provided by proposed storm sewers in Wescott Road and will be maintained lower ' than the pond abutting Wescott Road. Pond easement will have . rn ha, nrn.,y r�o,a to the HWL in addition to those utility easements necessary to extend storm sewers from the proposed Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Addition. The northwest- erly part of the site drains into a pond located in the northerly and central part of the site. This pond will drain northwesterly by storm sewer required as part of this development to Pond JP -32 which the storm sewer outlet will be provided as part of the Greensboro 2nd Addition. Pond easement for Pond JP -32 will be required to the HWL. Pond JP -32 is a wetland protected by the Depart- ment of Natural Resources and will require a permit to work below the normal ordinary high water level. - - /91 The grading of the site provides for gradual slopes and is in accordance with City of Eagan standards. Williams Pipeline does cross the site in the northwest corner but no grading is proposed in this area. However, storm sewer providing the outlet for the pond located in the northerly central part of the site to Pond JP -32 will cross the pipeline. Therefore, its construc- tion must be coordinated with Williams Pipeline Co. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main service will be provided with the proposed upgrading of Wescott Road. It is recommended the water main in the school site be looped through the trailway easement provided as part of Greensboro 2nd Addition and connect to the proposed water main in Greensboro 2nd Addition. STREETS: This site will be served by Wescott Road. Wescott Road is presently proposed to be upgraded in 1987 to a 52' width with concrete sidewalk on the north side and an 8' wide bituminous trail on the south. The site will be served by -a looped driveway around the pond abutting Wescott Road. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate a 50' half tiy_Y right-of-way for Wescott Road. This development shall also provide the neces- sary pond and utility easements. This development shall acquire all regulating agency permits within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. /0 , ,y EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES: This development shall adhere to the erosion/ sediment control measures in accordance with the City of Eagan's Erosion Control Manual and the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) recommendations. ASSESSMENTS: The assessment records indicate there are no pending assessments against the property and the following levied assessments: Project # Tyne Usaae 58 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Single -Family 433 Storm Sewer Trunk* Single -Family Only a portion of the property was assessed (see exhibits). As a condition of final platting, the City will require this development to be responsible for the following assessments: Description Usage Rate Quantity Assessment Water Area P.F. $1,250/Ac. 28.43 Ac. $ 35,538 Storm Sewer Upgrade P.F. .026/S.F. 247,424 S.F. 6,433 Wescott Road P.F. 92.76/F.F. 862.06 F.F. 79,965 Wescott Road Trail P.F. 12.40/F.F. 862.06 F.F. 10,690 Storm Sewer Additional P.F. .079/S.F. 990,987 S.F. 78,288 Assessment TOTAL ASSESSMENTS: $210,914 The above assessments are proposed; however, they may be levied as part of a public improvement project. All areas shown are "gross areas". There have been no deductions made for ponding areas. /37 , r. CONDITIONS: 1. All standard plat conditions shall apply. 2. All land swaps between City and School District shall be completed prior to final plat. 3. All necessary ponding easements shall be provided to the HWL as outlined above. 4. Utility easements necessary to extend storm sewers from the proposed Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Addition shall be provided. 5. The required permit from the DNR shall be secured prior to work on Pond JP -32. 6. Storm sewer constructed across the Williams Pipeline shall be coordinated with Williams Pipeline Company. 7. This development shall dedicate a 50 -foot, half right-of-way for Wescott Road. 8. Water main looping as recommended shall be provided. 9. This development shall adhere to erosion/sediment control measures as outlined in Exhibit A. Wi 9' width parking stalls shall be approved. A detailed landscape plan shall be a part of the final plat package. If a phasing plan is"used, all parking and service areas for the building shall have phase I status. 14 r: r .�, s ,� ,,—; s +� �, ,_ � , APC Minutes March 24, 1987 9. The existing common driveway opening shall be upgraded to a 32 foot wide entrance with 30 feet radii. 10. Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall accommodate future storm sewer. 11. All NB building and parking setbacks shall be maintained for Parcel A when developed. 12. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining a 15 foot driveway easement from Lot 5 to the south. All voted yes. MUELLER SCHOOL - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Independent School District #196 for rezoning of 28.43 acres to Public Facilities Park designation, and a preliminary plat for an elementary school located on the north side of Wescott Road, east of Lexington Avenue, in the southeast quarter of Section 14. Dale Runkle indicated that the Land Use Map had designated the area as P/E (Parks & Elementary) and therefore, a Comprehensive Guide Amendment was not necessary. Mr. Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation, was present to respond to any questions in regard to the park area use. There was no one present from the public. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning from A (Agricultural) to PF (Public Facilities). All voted yes. Harrison moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standards plat conditions shall apply. 2. All land swaps between the City and School District shall be completed prior to final plat. 3. All necessary ponding easements shall be provided to the HWL as outlined above. 4. Utility easements necessary to extend storm sewers from the proposed Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Addition shall be provided. 5. The required permit from the DNR shall be secured prior to work on Pond JP -32. 6. Storm sewer constructed across the Williams Pipeline shall be coordinated with Williams Pipeline Company. 103 i APC Minutes March 24, 1987 7. This development shall dedicate a 50 foot, half right-of-way for Wescott Road. 8. Water main looping as recommended shall be provided. 9. This development shall adhere to erosion/sediment control measures as outlined in Exhibit "A". 10. A detailed landscape plan shall be a part of the final package. If a phasing plan is used, all parking and service areas for the building shall have phase I status. Member McCrea noted that she would vote for the preliminary plat, in spite of the 9 foot parking spaces. All voted yea. SAFARI AT EAGAN - REPLAT TO THOMAS LAKE CENTER The next public hearing convened by Chairman Hall was upon the request of Linvill Properties, Inc. for a replat of Safari at Eagan consisting of 6 lots on 10.7 acres with Lot 1 containing a 41,000 square foot strip center. Additional lots were proposed for restaurant or small retail areas. Mr. Runkle gave a history of several previous preliminary plats that had preceded this preliminary plat. He also indicated that the County had now eliminated theright-in right -out access on Cliff Road. Mr. Ralph Linvill, partner with Mark Reilly, was present, in addition to the architect J. D. McRae, and also a civil engineer and traffic engineer. Mr. McRae presented elevation plans, descriptions of the proposed colors, building materials and berming. Sonja Tollefson was present and expressed concern regarding the number of retail sites along Cliff Road. Mr. Myron Smith, a single family owner on the south side of Cliff Road expressed concern regarding the sign size, heights and locations. Mr. Ed Dunn requested information as to the use of the property on the north side of Safari Lane. Mr. Linvill indicated that they had no interest in buying additional property. In response to member McCrea's questions, the applicant through Mr. Lou Stockville, a real estate agent, indicated that it had several interested tenants, although had signed none at this time. It was indicated that construction would start in May and the center would be open in November. . The developer indicated that the mechanical units were proposed to be located on the tops of the building, but not visible, due to the proposed facade. Member Trygg questioned the access on Thomas Lake Road, which Mr. Colbert said the staff had maximized as to the distance between Cliff 'Road and the access, without increasing the entrance grade to a point that was safe. 7 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REPLAY (THOMAS LAKE CENTER) APPLICANT: LINVILL PROPERTIES, INC. LOCATION: LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1, SAFARI AT EAGAN EXISTING ZONING: CSC WITHIN BLACKHAWK SOUTH PD DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 17, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Thomas Lake Center. This replat of the Safari at Eagan proposal consists of 6 lots on 10.7 acres with lot 1 containing a 41,000 sq. ft. strip center. The original proposal in 1981 was for an 83,000 sq. ft. mall type building. That plan was revised in late 1986 to _3 lots with one being a 42,000 sq. ft. strip center. The following is a breakdown of each lot in the March 1987 proposal: Lot 1 5.8 acres with an allowable building coverage of 65,000 sq. ft. The building proposed is 42,000 sq. ft. Parking required 205; .parking provided 216. The service area is on the North side of the building. Since the building has frontage on all four sides, a common sign band area should be required to eliminate a loading dock image on the North side. The trash enclosures -have been incorporated into the building itself. The exterior finish will be brick and potentially concrete block on. the lower half of the North side, a stucco sign band area, and aluminum store front area. Gabled reflective glass canopies create interest in the roof line area. The fan units are not shown in the elevations and therefore, are assumed to not be visible. Lot 2 A 1 acre lot designated for 93 seat restaurant. Parking for 31 required; 31 provided. - Lot 3 A 1.1 acre lot for a restaurant or retail use. The parking/building coverage shown for either use would meet code requirements. 47 REPLAT (THOMAS LAKE CENTER) - Page 2 Lot 4 If developed for= use other than parking, there will need to be proof that there will not be a shortage of spaces for the strip building. Lot 5 A 1 acre lot for retail/restaurant use; parking requirements have been met. Lot 6 A 9 acre lot for a 126 seat restaurant or 3,900 sq. ft. retail use building; parking requirements have been met. COMMENTS: The landscape plan with this submission reflects all City standards and is an excellent example of perimeter parking lot screening. This plan has overall consistency and from a design standpoint provides year round color and interest. Three pylon signs are being requested. The major sign 'along Cliff Road is 32 feet tall and contains 125 sq. ft. of signage area. If this center is determined to be a 'major complex' under the terms of the Sign Ordinance, the size shall be determined by the Council. The other signs are 16 feet tall with 40 sq. ft. of signage area at the Safari Boulevard and Thomas Lake entrances. Those signs are scaled down visions of the major sign. The consistency will add to the aesthetics of the site. r4? GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL: The property in its present state generally drains from south to north. The site is covered with dense grasses and there are a few trees surrounding the old farmhouse. The grading plan proposes a maximum cut of 19 ft. in the center of the development and a maximum fill of 11 ft. in the northeast corner and 8 ft. in the southeast corner. The grading plan proposes to level the site and maintain the drainage from south to north. The drainage from the site will be handled by the existing storm sewer system on Safari Boulevard that discharges to the north through an existing 36" storm sewer and then to a drainage ditch that empties into Pond BP -13. Pond BP -13 is drained by an existing 24" gravity storm sewer line that discharges into Thomas Lake. The existing storm sewer system that will serve this development is of sufficient size and capacity to handle the storm water runoff from this development plus the other areas that contribute to the system. The low area in the northwest corner of Safari Boulevard and Cliff Road will be developed as a ponding area and the outlet for this pond is a part of the Safari Boulevard storm sewer system. When Cliff road is upgraded, then the future storm sewer facilities that will be required should empty into this .pond rather than connect directly to the existing storm sewer line on Safari Boulevard. In regard to erosion control, the streets surrounding the proposed development must be protected to prevent sediment movement into the existing catch basins on Safari Boulevard and Thomas Lake Road. Sediment can be retained on this site by revegetating the site in a timely manner, by proper placement and maintenance of silt curtains and by using temporary gravel construction entances of at least 50 ft. at ingress and egress points. Also, erosion and sediment control practices designed to contain sediment on site shall be installed and functional before any grading begins. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size, capacity and depth is available to serve this development from Thomas Lake Road and Safari Boulevard. The developer's layout on the preliminary utility plan is acceptable, however, staff would recommend an alternative layout for the sanitary sewer. The developer proposed to connect to an existing manhole on the 27" sanitary sewer on Thomas Lake Road, however, this .sewer is almost 30 ft. deep and the connection to the manhole would require an outside drop section. Adding an outside drop section to an existing manhole is expensive plus the contractor might encounter ground water problems. Also, the contractor might have to close down Thomas Lake Road to make the connection and the repair work involved with replacing Thomas Lake Road to its original condition would be expensive. The alternative layout for the sanitary sewer would be to connect to the existing 8" sanitary sewer on Safari Boulevard. The alternative layout would require an extra 300 ft. of 8" sanitary sewer, but the total cost of the two alternatives might be similar. 10 W - �n The developer proposes to install sanitary sewer and water services to Lot 4 of this development which is shown as a parking lot on the site plan. In the future, if the use for Lot 4 was changed from a parking lot to a building, then the parking requirements might not be met for this development. The proposed temporary storm drainage system from Cliff Road through this site needs some further study as to final design to handle this problem. The preliminary utility plan should be revised to show at least a 10 ft. horizontal separation from the water main to the sanitary sewer and storm sewer lines that are parallel. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: This development will be adequately served by the existing streets that currently surround this development. Along the south side of the development is Cliff Road, a two-lane rural design roadway that is controlled by the Dakota County Highway Department. Along the east side of the development is Thomas Lake Road, a 44 ft. wide urban design roadway that is on the City's State Aid street system. Along the west and north sides of this development is Safari Boulevard, a 44 ft. wide urban design roadway installed for this development in 1981. In the future, Cliff Road will be upgraded to a.four-lane roadway with left -turn lanes. Also, a signed system will be installed at Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road when the traffic volumes warrant a new signal system. Therefore, the County strongly recommends that no accesses will be allowed onto Cliff Road between Thomas Lake Road and Safari Boulevard/Beacon Hill Road. The developer's site plan showed a driveway access onto Cliff road 310 ft. west of Thomas Lake Road. However, this access will not be allowed. Staff recommends that a new access onto Safari Boulevard be added at the east property line of Lot 6. The new access will provide a driveway opening near the trunk loading area to keep delivery trucks from driving through the parking lot areas. At the City's request, the developer has submitted a traffic, access and parking lot review report prepared by a traffic engineer. The report determined that special site distance or alignment problems were not apparent along Cliff Road or Thomas Lake Road. Also, the entering and exiting traffic wil 1 have four opportunities to enter or exit at the four driveways and the demand at any given driveway should be minimal. The report states that the 504 parking spaces provided will be adequate to serve this mixed use commercial development. .The proposed access driveway grade is approximately 10% on the east side of this development which is too steep. Staff recommends that the grading plan be revised so the driveway grade does not exceed 4%. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Staff recommends this development dedicate a 75 ft. half right-of-way for Cliff Road. Also, because of the potential grading required to upgrade Cliff road, staff recommends this development provide a 20 ft slope easement adjacent the southerly boundary of this proposed development. A 20 ft. utility easement shall be dedicated over the proposed 8" sanitary sewer line. Also, a 20 ft. utility easement shall be dedicated over the proposed 8"anitary sewer line. Also, a 20 ft. 10 utility easement shall be dedicated over the proposed " and 6" water mains up to an including all the hydrants but not including the service lines to the buildings. A 30 ft. wide combined utility easement is required when the proposed water main and sanitary sewer lines are parallel and 10 ft. apart. No unusual permit requirements are anticipated beyond the normal MPCA, MWCC and Department of Health permits for sanitary sewer and water extensions. A revised preliminary layout plan should be submitted to the Dakota County Highway Department as soon as possible to allow them to review the proposed improvements along Cliff Road and process the permit for work within County right-of- way. ASSESSMENTS: This property, will. be responsible for the following assessments at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. The rates listed below are 1987 rates and is calculated as follows: PROJ. # DESCRIPTION USAGE RATE QTY. ASSESSMENT 237 236 Cliff Rd. Upgrading Cliff Rd. Trail Water Main Lateral Benefit Upgrade Water Main Lateral Benefit Cliff Rd. Lateral Benefit Storm Sewer Trunk C/I C/I C/I $82.37/ff 829.8/ff $68,351.0( 12.40/ff 829.8/ff 10,290.0( 8.08/ff 649.4/ff 5,267.0( 20.55/ff 829.8/ff 17,052.0( 10.39/ff 40 Lin. Ft. 416.0( $101,356.( EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL: See attached letter dated March 12, 1987, from the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District for requirements and recommendations. lea CONDITIONS:Thomas Lake Center 1) All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to 2) A review of -the parking situation for the strip center shall be done before building on lot 4 occurs 3) A financial guarantee shall be submitted with the final land- scape plan and not released until after one (1) year from the installation date 4) This plat shall be responsible for trails along Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road 5) The pylon signs shall be approved as submitted. They must be 10 feet within. the property line 6) This Plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission for their recommendations 7) The fan units shall not be visable 8) The trash shall be incorporated within the building on Lot 1 9) All lots shall have site plan reviews by the Council prior to building permit issuance 10) The sign band shall be uniform on all sides of the building 11) All signage is subject to the one time sign fee of 2.50/sq. ft. 12) All of the perimeter landscaping shall be installed with the first phase construction. 13) All drainage and ponding easements required by the City of Eagan shall be dedicated on the final plat. A minimum 20' easement shall be dedicated for all utilities not located within public right-of-way. All other drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated as required by staff as a part of the final plat. 14) All permits required by local, County, Regional and State agencies shall be acquired prior to final plat approval. 15) This development shall be responsible for all the additional assessments required with this proposal as determined by the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 16) this development shall comply with all applicable standard Engineering conditions. a t� 17) If public improvements are to be installed under City contract, the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 18) If public- improvements are installed privately, plans and specifications for improvements must be prepared by a registered engineer in accordance with City designed guidelines. 19) All costs of internal public improvements within this development shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 20) A 75' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Cliff Road. 16!z cc W W CL U } W m Y a a Z J W � CC n IL O z W 4 = 0 ~ a O w H O a z z ¢ o O Q o a U a U)0 LZ Y LLJ Ucf) O mw w z_ ¢ J w Q v r W'0 > f- f - J j a N O U p W Q O r ¢ (A O O r Y U O Q w J O ¢ 63 -iVIOSSNNIW 'NV9VS _ s:ssnj NV'Id MISSaIwc o s 1 i 2IS,LNHO SJIV'I SYNOH,L Aa,YU19 ! f OVOH 3Hr► SVV40RL 3 1 1 Hy ? s= I X11111 M1111 d1ill dill 411111111!111 !91(d a r OVOH 3Hr► SVV40RL 3 W < w z ti 1; p z 0 7 w > cr avou 3)4vl Ah 0HI -----------III �I ---------- a; WN v •�lbiNNIW. A.IM rill VAllMVU. liVUYd --LU sAepro�_. SNOUNATIR ONIa llflO gg, NAD gMVI SVWOHl 1 dauue� I� GI�•� P• - .1 • I—T]tlG — F 1 7Y c =: 9 rr 1 I 4 3 ! l - + 1 e 0 - 7 z=. SLS l WN A SNOW 400- 128 51.7/67.0 —4 12, 118" F I §JkO4* 1 1 8 .i t -j- g�, ' 5 2.6 /.6 7. 0 '17'117 1? 4'] Ci 207 5 0" M. G-" --GROUNO AGE STOFr-44.6/59.0 H.W. ')059 0 z 12 E -AI.rol 38.3/94.0 Flo 2 ol (�P) j CAN-& qf- CL'11!A N PAR.K �j 160 21.8/31.0 A PUL- i0o c :j 16 001100'88.5/ 82.8/9'4.0 100.0 JJ -ro 0-65.0 4.4 /10 C/ m A H12 12 159 16S .17CP 43.2/58.0 0 80.7/92.0 176-3/ 1020 Sao - - - ------------------- IV/ 1870/98.01 A J, Z' 10), / �jj [THOWS 158 C�- 116 17- 81.1/92.0 ' .-I . F HEIG' tt CHOO 8-1 -r Ez G., \PowrR UTILITY e-�' NO T �"l RENT 66' -f 93.5/104.0 156 157 9"/94.0 r4INIAS LAKE PARK "'m "UA C11 16 9) ..44 6.0/ %s Ifi C r A AFAR[ L AT E A Q�2 -4 221 i JT 'b/74.0 (D(00 70.5/ 74D F7-, 4, 1 2 M.G. GROUND STORAGE' 6:478 3000 G.P.M. BOOSTER H XL;. 1055 6iECLIF PARKVIEW ADDITION 11 16 L COURSEGOLF w X DCS' --- fel nn 59.8/76.0 WIA BrA a 9 G' Pi r 68.0/82.0 12 35.5/50.( Q�K�P 71-17 i1sVe" 540 it 1 � 1020 208 'A 20 THOMAS LAKE- CENTER SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. -*3 city of eagan approved: standard PUBLIC plate #: WORKS MASTER PLAN 10 DEPARTMENT m /5) 3NVI SVWOHI g T � 3 12 ' cam_ N oZ m N CIS , oG \ Q' 00 O \ SO \ m 1 02� •_- I °E of :II I Q II I I I> �- I ` r� O I I °ll I I \I1 N O � 3.E1.SF sO N / If 'A." 9 4 St I LL LL J U ji Ju j ii J zc i D J CV08 3NVI SVNOHI g :?-r/ Ef a0 IV co- �;I C co� " N LL LU LU LU I � m m p ' 1 OF OFOF LU I a, N ii; I O �m Q am r � ; T I I 102 I I ll W op I IO A n N ♦ ) I In \D � ' M OF --- --- -, ---- CO OEz 00 001? m� < Q• N ' II p h O V l O \ •00 b rr'C.i Y oC vY2 3..00 .'2 Q0 N.— `_; M I�lvvs m si L 4 ad08 3NVI SdWOHI R adds 0 �1 MWE LL U— J U L F r Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 1610 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454 MEMORANDCH TO: Mr. J. D. McRae 123 North Third Street Minneapolis, Minnesota FROM: Deane M. Wenger & ton-Aschnan Associates, Inc. 1610 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota ' DATE: February 25, 1987 SUH7ECT': PROPOSED DEVEIDPM= SITE DAKM CO= ROAD 32 AT nnIA.S = ROAD EAGAN, MDWESOT_A 612-332-0421 The proposed site was viewed on February 23, 1987. The check was made to determine whether special sight distance or alignment problems were apparent. Our conclusion was that the problems did not exist. • H91 I211.f', In a development of this type, where the basic center is to be developed then additions made, the total trip generation is scanewhat nebulous. The values used to develop the preliminary trip generation are: 1. 45,000 square feet of retail space oriented toward convenience goods. 2. Office space to be provided on one .lot. The square footage would likely be 8,000 to 10,000 square feet. LE Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Page 2 3. Four fast food sites of about 2,500 to 4,000 square feet. The trip generation of a smaller commercial center is normally higher than for a lamer center unless the smaller center is,to concentrate on specialty stores. Having a mix of fast food and other restaurants are quite desirable in terms of both trip generation and parking accumulation. The principal idea is that the individual uses in the mixed use development do not create peak demands during the same hours. Trip generation calculations are most pertinent for the P.M. peak hour. This hour represents reasonably high trip generation from the site and maxm= volumes on the adjacent arterial streets for a single hour. Though 24 hour volumes are useful for factors such as pavement thickness, they have no effect on peak hour capacity and, therefore, design and lane Preliminary estimates of trip generation indicate this site might generate the following numbers of trips per hour during the P.M. peak hour: JW r Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Page 3 Table 1 P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation Trip Rate Trips/ Trip Rate Trips/ Land Use Size In Hour Out Haar Retail 42,000 Sq. Ft. 2.6 -s 109 2.0 84 Office 9,000 Sq. Ft. 0.2 3 2.0 18 Restaurant 30,000 Sq. Ft. 8.0 240 5.0 180 Total 352 VPH 282 VPH Both the inbound and outbound trip volumes are relatively low for a commercial development As a rule of thumb, one can compare the demand to a rush hour lane capacity of about 500 vehicles per hour. In this instance, the entering and exiting traffic will have four opportunities to enter or exit four driveways. The demand for capacity at any given driveway should be minimal. A characteristic of trip generation to the type of retail development proposed is that it attracts relatively short trips. Therefore, the trade area is localized arra quite symetrical. This is a distinct advantage to the handling of traffic. The trips generated by the development must be added to the trip forecasts and patterns of trip increases on both Lake Thomas Road and on Cliff Road. At this junction, it is unlikely the intersection of the two would have to 163 Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Page 4 be signalized nor would Cliff Road east and west of the site have to be widened to a four lane cross-section, except to provide for turn slots to insure the safety of the dons. ass The parking standards for the City of Eagan have not been made available. The following summarizes what we believe are minimum workable parking ratios per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. The city may wish to have a higher ratio or a factor of safety. Similarly, the developer may choose to provide higher ratios to enhance the attractiveness of the center. Nonetheless, we submit the minimum ratios listed can be documented for an average or design data based on counts assembled for the Twin Cities metropolitan area. We have consistently found that in the past 10 years, the older standards for trip generation and parking needs are excessively high. F, No one is interested in providing inadequate parking supply but conversely, an excessive ratio only raises project costs or prevents the city from attaining the density of development (arra, therefore, tax base) that can be 144 Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Page 5 justified. Rates that are too high harm the developer (city objectives about as much as too low rates creating unworkability). Table 2 Mi n i mtnn Recoamended parking Ratios .1 11 Parking Parking Land Use Size (Sq. Ft.) Ratio/1,000 S. F. Req ire Retail 42,000 5.0 210 Office 8,000 3.0 24 Restaurants 30,000 8.0 240 Total 474 The number of spaces proposed for the site totals 504. The developer is not trying to minimize the number of spaces to be provided; especially when one has not even considered the desirable mix of land uses which permits a reduction in the number of parking spaces required. Studies done by Barton-Aschman for the Urban Larxi Institute, indicate the total number of parking spaces needed in a mixed land use development can be 14 to 25 percent lower than the aggregate for the individual uses. With the proposed supply, the city has, in our opinion, a safety factor of about 20 percent. An important factor is that the parking supplied is reasonably convenient or desirable and not tucked into corners of the parking areas. In addition, the office, retail and restaurant parking areas must be accessible /'6-5-- e Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. (conveniently) to more than one use. Walking distance between differing uses is also important. V24121-• •e •. The site has good access from the east and west V -1a CSAH 32 as well as to the north on Take Thomas Road. It should be noted, however, that CSAH 32 to the west has significantly higher volumes near Johnny Cake Ridge Road and west of Galaxie Drive. These sections are four lane. The induced traffic is caused by the convenient interchange access from Cedar Avenue (TH 7) and the development east of the interchange. In 1984, which is the last year for which counts are available, the volumes on CR 32 at Take 'Thomas Road were about 6,900 vehicles per day. This is at the break point for which designers. should shift from a two to a four lane section. The inclusion of another moderate sized center will not merit the increase to the number of lanes required but may accelerate the need for the widening. The volumes already indicate a need for widening to four lanes. 4 Take Thomas Road is not a critical street in terms of capacity needs; based on observation. Limited access points to the arterial appear, however, to be most appropriate. Capacity analyses can verify these conclusions. 7k / MINNESOTA SOIL AND WATER March 12, 1987 DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT CONSERVATION DISTRICTS TO: Mike Foertsch City of Eagan FROM: Barb McCarthy Dakota County SWCD Farmington Professional Building 821 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: (612) 463-8626 RE: Review of Preliminary Plat for Thomas Lake Center. We would like to submit the following comments for our review of the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan for Thomas Lake Center, dated March 9, 1987. INVENTORY OF SOIL RESOURCES There are two areas on the proposed site where the Dakota County Soil Survey indicates that wet soils occur. These areas, identified on the enclosed Plan, generally have a "perched" water table one ft. above to two ft. below the existing ground surface during the months of November -May. The developer should be aware of this soil condition during the planning process. Perhaps the soil borings done on-site identified this condition. Prior to fill being placed in these areas, all unsuitable soil materials should be excavated. All fills should be properly compacted. INVENTORY OF WATER RESOURCES No "wetlands" occur on this site. The site is proposed to discharge stormwater north directly into Thomas Lake. Because of the potential for significant sediment loadings as this site is being developed, we recommend that a properly designed sediment basin be constructed on the northeast corner of the site (see discussion under GC -5 to follow) . 147 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW An incomplete erosion and sediment control (E & SC) plan was submitted with the plat. The "General Criteria" and "Checklist" for an erosion and sediment control plan should be used in developing these plans, including a site plan and accompanying narrative. GC -1 and GC -2 Stabilization of Denuded Areas The E & SC plan should address re -vegetation of the entire site and not only on slopes greater the 4:1. The following items should be addressed on the plan and in the narrative section: the location of vegetative measures and seeding and mulching specifications (types, seeding date, species, rate of application, seed placement, fertilizer requirements, method of anchoring mulch). We recommend that the site be re -vegetated within 1-2 days after rough grading. Please include a proposed schedule for blacktopping roads and parking areas. GC -3 Protection of Adjacent Property,_ The streets surrounding the proposed development must be protected to prevent sediment movement into catch basins and into Thomas Lake. Sediment can be retained on this site by "benching" more lots, by re -vegetating the site in a timely manner, by the proper placement and maintenance of silt curtains, by using temporary gravel construction entrances at ingress and egress points, and by using a temporary sediment basin on-site to minimize sediment damage to Thomas Lake. Perhaps a segment of the silt curtain running along the west side of the site could be eliminated because it appears from the proposed contours that runoff will be directed towards the site. GC -4 Timing and Stabilization of Sediment Tranping Measures_ Erosion and sediment control practices designed to contain sediment on-site must be installed and functional before any clearing, grubbing, or grading begins. The person responsible for installing and maintaining these practices must be identified on the E & SC Plan. GC -5 Sediment Basins Runoff from this site is proposed to drain directly into Thomas Lake. To minimize sediment and nutrient loadings to Thomas Lake, we recommend that a sediment basin be constructed in the northeast c/o er of the site before any 1� J + r clearing, grubbing, and grading occurs. Runoff from the site should be directed into this basin. We recommend that this basin be designed according to the Soil Conservation Service's (SCS) standards that are enclosed. (ie, minimum detention time of 24 hours, minimum detention storage of 1.0 acre -inch per acre of drainage area). Sediment basins are generally 70-80o effective in removing sediments. Thus, it is important to implement upstream conservation practices. GC -6 Cut and Fill Slopes We recommend that lots be "benched". We expect that lots 2,3,5, & 6 will be leveled at some time to accommodate the proposal structure. We recommend that drainage from these lots be directed back into the hill rather than "with the hill". GC -7 Stormwater Management Criteria for Controllinq Off -Site Erosion. See description of GC -7 in the "General Criteria". GC -8 Stabilization of Waterways and Stormsewer n„f-I c+ -a Not applicable. GC -9 Stormsewer Inlet Protection We do not anticipate a need for stormsewer inlet filters at this time. If a sediment basin is used, lots are benched, gravel access pads are used, and if the site is re -vegetated in a timel-; manner, few problems should result. GC -10 Working in or Crossing Watercources Not applicable. GC -11 Utility Construction Re -vegetation of all areas disturbed by utility construction should be addressed in the plan. GC -12 Construction Access Routes To minimize the tracking of mud by vehicles onto paved roads, we recommend that a temporary gravel construction entrance be installed (and maintained) at all ingress and egress points. Specifications for this gravel pad are contained in Eagan's Erosion Control Manual. The gravel pad should be at least 50 ft. -in length, not 30 ft. as identified on the prepared plan. 16l GC -13 Disposition of Temporary Measures All erosion and sediment control measures should be removed after these measures are no longer required. The company responsible for removing these measures should be identified on the E & SC Plan. GC -14 Maintenance All erosion and sediment measures should be regularly inspected and maintained as needed. We recommend that a statement be placed on the development plan that the builders will be responsible for E&SC during construction. At this time, we cannot approve the Erosion Control Plan submitted for this project. We understand that with any new program, it takes time to educate those involved in developing adequate Erosion and Sediment Control Plans. We hope that acceptable Erosion and Sediment Control Plans are submitted with future Preliminary Plats. We recommend that the Preliminary Plat be approved, but that an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan be submitted and approved by SWCD staff before a grading permit is issued. cc: Eagan Center Association Ralph Wagner, Probe Engineering /7o APC Minutes March 24, 1937 7. This development shall dedicate a 50 foot, half right-of-way for Wescott Road. 8. Water main looping as recommended shall be provided. 9. This development shall adhere to erosion/sediment control measures as outlined in Exhibit "A". 10. A detailed landscape plan shall be a part of the final package. If a phasing plan is used, all parking and service areas for the building shall have phase I status. Member McCrea noted that she would vote for the preliminary plat, in spite of the 9 foot parking spaces. All voted yea. SAFARI AT EAGAN - REPLAT TO THOMAS LAKE CENTER The next public hearing convened by Chairman Hall was upon the request of Linvill Properties, Inc. for a replat of Safari at Eagan consisting of 6 lots on 10.7 acres with Lot 1 containing a 41,000 square foot strip center. Additional lots were proposed for restaurant or small retail areas. Mr. Runkle gave a history of several previous preliminary plats that had preceded this preliminary plat. He also indicated that the County had now eliminated the right -in right -out access on Cliff Road. Mr. Ralph Linvill, partner with Mark Reilly, was present, in addition to the architect J. D. McRae, and also a civil engineer and traffic engineer. Mr. McRae presented elevation plans, descriptions of the proposed colors, building materials and berming. Sonja Tollefson was present and expressed concern regarding the number of retail sites along Cliff Road. Mr. Myron Smith, a single family owner on the south side of Cliff Road expressed concern regarding the sign size, heights and locations. Mr. Ed Dunn requested information as to the use of the property on the north side of Safari Lane. Mr. Linvill indicated that they had no interest in buying additional property. In response to member McCrea's questions, the applicant through Mr. Lou Stockville, a real estate agent, indicated that it had several interested tenants, although had signed none at this time. It was indicated that construction would start in May and the center would be open in November. The developer indicated that the mechanical units were proposed to be located on the tops of the building, but not visible, due to the proposed facade. Member Trygg questioned the access on Thomas Lake Road, which Mr. Colbert said the staff had maximized as to the distance between Cliff Road and the access, without increasing the entrance grade to a point that was safe. 171 7 APC Minutes March 24, 1937 Mr. Bill Mauer of Probe Engineering indicated that the entrance would have a 4% grade. It was indicated that the three proposed pylon signs were over 300 feet apart. Member Voracek raised questions as to the ability of semi -trailers to negotiate the rear driveways in light of the slope and retaining walls. Mr. Harrison questioned the need for future pylon signs for restaurants. In response to Member Trygg's questions, Mr. Foertsch indicated there was a need to address the drainage problem associated with the Cliff Road upgrade and that water presently drained on to the property under Cliff Road. Mr. Colbert said that the County would review the signalization of the Thomas Lake Road and Cliff Road intersection in 1988. In response to member McCrea's questions, the applicant indicated that it was requesting 3 pylon signs for Lot 1. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 2. A review of the parking situation for the strip center shall be done before building on Lot 4 occurs. 3. A financial guarantee shall be submitted with the final landscape plan and not released until after one (1) year from the installation date. 4. This plat shall be responsible for trails along Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road. 5. This plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission for their recommendations. 6. Roof top fan units shall not be allowed. 7. The trash shall be incorporated within the building on Lot 1. 8. All lots shall have a site plan review by the Council prior to building permit issuance. 9. The sign band shall be uniform on all sides of the building. 10. All signage is subject to the one time sign fee of 2.50 per square foot. 11. All of the perimeter landscaping shall be installed with the first phase construction. 12. All drainage and ponding easements required by the City of Eagan shall be dedicated on the final plat. A minimum 20 foot easement shall be dedicated for all utilities not located within public right-of-way. All other drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated as required by staff as a part of the final plat. APC Minutes March 24, 1987 13. All permits required by local, County, Regional and State agencies shall be acquired prior to final plat approval. 14. This development shall be responsible for all the additional assessments required with this proposal as determined by the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 15. This development shall comply with all applicable standard engineering conditions. 16. If public improvements are to be installed under City contract, the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 17. If public improvements are installed privately, plans and specifications for improvements must be prepared by a registered engineer in accordance with City designed guidelines. 13. All costs of internal public improvements within this development shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 19. A 75 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Cliff Road. 20. The temporary drainage issue in regard to the upgrading of Cliff Road shall be resolved. All voted yea, except Hall who abstained because of the potential appearance of a conflict resulting from an association with two of the individuals present on behalf of the application. Voracek moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend continuance of the request for pylon signs until the entire parcel can be reviewed. All voted in favor, except Hall who abstained for the reasons previously stated. OAK CLIFF ADDITION - REZONING Chairman Hall called the public hearing in regard to the application of Richard Winkler to rezone Lot 1, Block 2, and Lots 7 and 8, Block 1, Oak Cliff Addition from R-2 PD to R-1 PD to allow single family homes in lieu of duplexes. Mr. Runkle introduced the application which was a request to rezone 3 lots presently indicated as duplex and adjacent to single family, into single family. Mr. Dick Winkler was present and indicated again, that the Oak Cliff Addition was surprising him and others as the homes became bigger and more expensive than anticipated. Father Burns of the neighboring Mary Mother Church, was present to express his agreement and applaud the development that had occurred. 113 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND REZONING/OAR CLIFF ADDITION N. Planned Development Amendment and Rezoning of R-2 lots to R-1 on Block 1 of the Oak Cliff Addition -- A public hearing was held at the March 24, 1987 APC Meeting to consider an application for the Rezoning of three R-2 lots to single family lots and a Planned Development Amendment for Lot 1, Block 2, and Lots 7 and 8, Block 1 of the Oak Cliff Addition. The APC is recommending approval of the Planned Development Amendment and Rezoning. For a copy of the staff report on the R zoning Application submitted by Richard Winkler refer to pages through For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page or pages _111through for a copy of the Minutes. It ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the Rezoning for Richard Winkler on Lot 1, Block 2 and Lots 7 and 8, Block 1, of the Oak Cliff Addition. /%r CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING (OAK CLIFF ADDITION) APPLICANT: RICHARD WINKLER LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, AND LOTS 7 & 8, BLOCK 1, OAK CLIFF ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-2 WITHIN WINKLER/JACKSON PD DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a rezoning of three R-2 lots to single family lots and a Planned Development Amendment for Lot 1, Block 2, and Lots 7 and 8, Block 1, of the Oak Cliff Addition. This plat is apart of the Winkler/Jackson PD. No Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will be necessary. The lots to the east are twinhomes and all of the lots to the west and south are single family... These lots exceed all R-1 requirements and are serviced by Mahogany Drive. If approved, this Rezoning shall be subject to all applicable R-1 requirements. * With this application, Mr. Winkler included a request for an extension of the Winkler/ Jackson PD. That agreement was signed on July 6, 1982 for a five year period. san sA'as'v ��..•.,r ne.:1 :: '�, • .•—iii®.. �� OAK CLIFF y 1987 Lr•- Lt aaa +I.7 1` .MAH•• ANY, 4 � � - I� � �� a `. *tea, L. .b 'R•' s _ i Lin. 'r v.a-'. _ n �'� i •-- "tip icc 0 MAHOGANY WAY 41 V V 12 2 /- ir I ..� 2 ag . 3 —2-j Ldw-w L•—_ 'O ��ai :�� ml �lI ±�I. ��� 13 :I I. I-� 1�1=era[•a IZ JI `.I ~ 1 Y ^� 4 j. ', ` 4-./J,"�`\'a 2 cc >� 91 C 14 I': t u a•w G. ,1.. .t LI 1 a0 . I`�a__—I --- ' I • ^r..=- t 3 �e1 `6 i 2 I L:�:-9 a 17 1.0 15 o 4 6 ?,.c' L s 15•�T111 _M1!�•� 1s t ��._._wi ;....•.1sJ7� '/• �•%s, �i''lL�s ``\ IW It 17 : _ _ +�,_••'lL iii Y N i asa t .� c . Lt 1' „ •' VSIB+ _jam yl•.� .A a.. 8 TA - �-F,-�; `. - • -:Ja f ,' I is 1 i7�� r� � � t 4 I b fu I I Lam— '' w,, ,.�' ;>3 >a 20•= •STREET 't a L•JAMES STRE 4. -.:�,_ �• �1 I .. � 11 q .,\ rl -� -' 21 -_ __L.: 2 ;c - biii ,`E 5 4 3 2 Y ----J' '_r,,..__. -JL .... J l a•.. .•� r. 1 I _.w \ ww ____—_____—__"4a '� .R'rM0/l • ,� SCa1L.L IN Fier INSET SCALE 176 VICINITY MAP z�� v a:{F NORTH NO SCALE -r- SEC. 31, T. 27, R. 23 DRAINAGE AND UTILITI ARE SHOWN : V 4 Y ' L I III:IIR: 5 f';LT IN Will -III, 1w II:II I l:t 1.1:11. A:III .\11.1111111111: I 111 11.1.1' II. Vl Nlll, 11:11115 1 t':u A11.111Illlla: 51'KI.1.T 1.1 tIi_ APC Minutes March 24, 1987 13. All permits required by local, County, Regional and State agencies shall be acquired prior to final plat approval. 14. This development shall be responsible for all the additional assessments required with this proposal as determined by the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 15. This development shall comply with all applicable standard engineering conditions. 16. If public improvements are to be installed under City contract, the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 17. If public improvements are installed privately, plans and specifications for improvements must be prepared by a registered engineer in accordance with City designed guidelines. 13. All costs of internal public improvements within this development shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 19. A 75 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Cliff Road. 20. The temporary drainage issue in regard to the upgrading of Cliff Road shall be resolved. All voted yea, except Hall who abstained because of the potential appearance of a conflict resulting from an association with two of the individuals present on behalf of the application. Voracek moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend continuance of the request for pylon signs until the entire parcel can be reviewed. All voted in favor, except Hall who abstained for the reasons previously stated. OAK CLIFF ADDITION - REZONING Chairman Hall called the public hearing in regard to the application of Richard Winkler to rezone Lot 1, Block 2, and Lots 7 and 8, Block 1, Oak Cliff Addition from R-2 PD to R-1 PD to allow single family homes in lieu of duplexes. Mr. Runkle introduced the application which was a request to rezone 3 lots presently indicated as duplex and adjacent to single family, into single family. Mr. Dick Winkler was present and indicated again, that the Oak Cliff Addition was surprising him and others as the homes became bigger and more expensive than anticipated. Father Burns of the neighboring Mary Mother Church, was present to express his agreement and applaud the development that had occurred. ill APC Minutes March 24, 1937 Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning and amendment of the Planned Development Agreement. All voted aye. It was indicated that a notice of public hearing would be necessary for the extension of the Planned Development Agreement as requested by the developer. LOT 4, CARLSON ACRES - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Runkle introduced the application of Wally and Michael Nelson to rezone a residential single family lot, presently a legal non -conforming use for construction storage, to LB (Limited Business) on approximately 1.3 acres at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Diffley Road. The request was to allow an 11,520 square foot office building on a single 60,000 square foot lot. Hans Timper of Cedar Corporation was present on behalf of the applicants. Mr. Timper indicated that the proposal was to construct one building, possibly in two parts, that all construction storage would be removed during the construction process. He also reviewed a three page report indicating the pros and cons of the use of the property for various uses. Mrs. Gail Stahl was present. As a landowner adjacent to the property, she indicated that non- conforming use, in her opinion, had created additional water run-off on her property. She indicated she had to pay $240.00 for a survey to determine that the Nelsons were expanding beyond their own property lines. Mr. Jim DelGreco, a resident at the intersection of Sequoia and Sigfrid, read a letter in opposition to the proposal from neighbors and indicated that two other neighbors had indicated their opposition. Mr. Harrison indicated that it was his position that the rezoning of the single parcel would be spot zoning. Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the rezoning and to direct staff to review the expansion of non -conforming use. All voted in favor except Gustafson who voted no. ADJOURNMENT Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 10:10 p.m. All voted affirmatively. Secretary APC DGK Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-two COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING/WALLY NELSON O. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning of Lot 4, Carlson Acres from R-1 to LB -- A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on March 24, 1987, to consider a request submitted by Wally and Michael Nelson to rezone approximately 1.38 acres from R-1, Residential Single District to LB, Limited Business, to allow two (2) 11,520 total square feet office buildings. The Preliminary Plat would consist of 60,000 square feet and contain one lot. The APC is recommending denial of both the Rezoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan. Enclosed on pages ffV _ through J is a copy of the Staff Report. For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to Minutes enclosed on page or pages _JF5 - ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning from R-1 to LB as proposed by Wally and Michael Nelson. 17� .r, CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: WALLY B & MICHAEL NELSON LOCATION: LOT 4, CARLSON ACRES EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1.987 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 19, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED: The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 1.38 acres from R-1, Residential Single District, to LB, Limited Business, to allow two 11,520 total sq. ft. office buildings. The Preliminary Plat would consist of 60,000 sq. ft. (1.3 acres) and contain one lot. ZONING & LAND USE: Currently, the parcel is zoned R-1, Residential Single District, and would only allow a single family development to occur in this area. There is an existing home/office and outside storage for a construction company on the site. This company has been operating for the past 25 years and currently has been -- established as a legal nonconforming use. Therefore, this business operation can continue to remain and operate as long as the use does not increase in intensity or size. The Comprehensive Guide Plan also designates this parcel as D-1, low density residential, with the density of 0-3 dwelling units per acre. COMMENTS:- The applicants are proposing to remove the single family home and construct the first :office building containing 5,760 sq. ft. and retain the outside storage and existing office until the new facility is built. The second phase would then be constructed and contain approximately 6,048 sq. ft. This office is proposed to be a one-story building. The parking spaces provided is 61, which is the required number by the zoning ordinance. Access to this facility would be from Diffley Road on the westerly corner of the plat. This access would be from the relocated service road running along the southerly boundary of Diffley Road. No access is being proposed from Pilot Knob Road. It appears that the buildings meet all setback requirements and parking requirements from the County roads. In review of this particuiar plan, it appears to be more of a land use question - does the City rezone a new parcel which has not been designated or proposed on the Comprehensive Guide or does the City follow the guide with the D-1 land use and allow Mr. Nelson to operate as a legal nonconforming use as long as the business does not increase in Qsize or intensity. j .r, CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: WALLY B & MICHAEL NELSON LOCATION: LOT 4, CARLSON ACRES EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1.987 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 19, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED: The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 1.38 acres from R-1, Residential Single District, to LB, Limited Business, to allow two 11,520 total sq. ft. office buildings. The Preliminary Plat would consist of 60,000 sq. ft. (1.3 acres) and contain one lot. ZONING & LAND USE: Currently, the parcel is zoned R-1, Residential Single District, and would only allow a single family development to occur in this area. There is an existing home/office and outside storage for a construction company on the site. This company has been operating for the past 25 years and currently has been -- established as a legal nonconforming use. Therefore, this business operation can continue to remain and operate as long as the use does not increase in intensity or size. The Comprehensive Guide Plan also designates this parcel as D-1, low density residential, with the density of 0-3 dwelling units per acre. COMMENTS:- The applicants are proposing to remove the single family home and construct the first :office building containing 5,760 sq. ft. and retain the outside storage and existing office until the new facility is built. The second phase would then be constructed and contain approximately 6,048 sq. ft. This office is proposed to be a one-story building. The parking spaces provided is 61, which is the required number by the zoning ordinance. Access to this facility would be from Diffley Road on the westerly corner of the plat. This access would be from the relocated service road running along the southerly boundary of Diffley Road. No access is being proposed from Pilot Knob Road. It appears that the buildings meet all setback requirements and parking requirements from the County roads. In review of this particuiar plan, it appears to be more of a land use question - does the City rezone a new parcel which has not been designated or proposed on the Comprehensive Guide or does the City follow the guide with the D-1 land use and allow Mr. Nelson to operate as a legal nonconforming use as long as the business does not increase in Qsize or intensity. CONDITIONS: WALLY B & MICHAEL NELSON 1. The standard plat conditions should be adhered to. 2. The plat should be subject to a Park's Dedication Fee. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be provided and reviewed and a landscape bond shall be submitted and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 4. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by City staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Only an office building shall be allowed as a permitted use in this Limited Business District. �L�J ���� ��-� PROPOSED DIFFLEY ROAD PROPOSED ....... i OFFICE COMPLEX corporation FOR W.V.NELSON=EAGAN.MIRAL�cedor --- I t-711 C) C4 A C2 A Z PROPOSEO OFFICE COMPLEX Ct-4 -j 7 PROPOSED ....... i OFFICE COMPLEX corporation FOR W.V.NELSON=EAGAN.MIRAL�cedor --- I t-711 PROPOSED DIFFLEY ROAD I I w u � L r� = i n Riley y�i Yc O . 1 f f m o n LP I PC 4 07 a A 4 ` i �: _ I Yln�� L r I I w u r� C3 i n Riley y�i Yc O . 1 f I I w C3 i n Riley y�i ON It O 1 f f m o n LP I PC 0 07 a A 4 ` i �: _ I - •••� PROPOSED i..w.w e,«. .I.... OFFICE COMPLEX cedar corporation EOR W.V.NMON cc EAGAN,MINN. n. :a w n Riley y�i ON It '�• 1 f Ol- �� n LP .. r 0 a i - •••� PROPOSED i..w.w e,«. .I.... OFFICE COMPLEX cedar corporation EOR W.V.NMON cc EAGAN,MINN. n. :a APC Minutes March 24, 1937 Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning and amendment of the Planned Development Agreement. All voted aye. It was indicated that a notice of public hearing would be necessary for the extension of the Planned Development Agreement as requested by the developer. LOT 4, CARLSON ACRES - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Runkle introduced the application of Wally and Michael Nelson to rezone a residential single family lot, presently a legal non -conforming use for construction storage, to LB (Limited Business) on approximately 1.3 acres at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Diffley Road. The request was to allow an 11,520 square foot office building on a single 60,000 square foot lot. Hans Timper of Cedar Corporation was present on behalf of the applicants. Mr. Timper indicated that the proposal was to construct one building, possibly in two parts, that all construction storage would be removed during the construction process. He also reviewed a three page report indicating the pros and cons of the use of the property for various uses. Mrs. Gail Stahl was present. As a landowner adjacent to the property, she indicated that non- conforming use, in her opinion, had created additional water run-off on her property. She indicated she had to pay $240.00 for a survey to determine that the Nelsons were expanding beyond their own property lines. Mr. Jim DelGreco, a resident at the intersection of Sequoia and Sigfrid, read a letter in opposition to the proposal from neighbors and indicated that two other neighbors had indicated their opposition. Mr. Harrison indicated that it was his position that the rezoning of the single parcel would be spot zoning. Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the rezoning and to direct staff to review the expansion of non -conforming use. All voted in favor except Gustafson who voted no. ADJOURNMENT Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 10:10 p.m. All voted affirmatively. DGK Secretary - APC )9-15 10 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three ORDINANCE AMENDMENT/REQUIREMENT OF SERVICE BAYS IN GB DISTRICT P. Ordinance Amendment to the City Code, Chapter 11.20 Subdivision 11C, Requiring Service Bays in General Business Districts With Motor Fuel Sales -- Recently, it was discovered that during the ordinance conification there was no requirement included in the City Code under General Business Districts that require service bays with the sale of motor fuel sales. Since this regulatory language exists in all other commercial zoning districts, the City Attorney's Office was directed to prepare an Ordinance Amendment that would keep the General Business District consistent with all other commercial zoning districts. An Ordinance Amendment was prepared by the City Attorney's Office and because any amendment to the zoning ordinance requires a public hearing before the Advisory Planning Commission, this item was considered by the APC in an official public hearing at the March 26, 1987, meeting. The APC is recommending approval of the Ordinance Amendment as presented. For a copy of the Ordinance Amendment as prepared by the City Attorney's Office refer to page . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the Ordinance Amendment to the City Code, Chapter 11.20 Subdivision 11C, that requires service bays in General Business Districts with motor fuel sales. C ORDINANCE N0. , 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE, CHAPTER 11, ENTITLED "LAND USE REGULATIONS" BY CHANGING PROVISIONS RELATING TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR MOTOR FUEL SALES IN GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICTS AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Eagan City Code, Chapter 11, is hereby amended by changing Section 11.20, Subd. ll.C. to read as follows: Section 11.20, Subd. ll.0 (1). Motor fuel sales as part of a full— service service station including service bays for vehicle repair and maintenance. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violations" is hereby adopted in its entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: By: Its Clerk CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the legal newspaper: IV Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four REPLAY LEMAY LAKE HILLS TOWNHOUSE PROJECT Q. Replat of a Townhouse Project to Convert from Rental to Owner Occupancy Status -- At the March 26, 1987 APC Meeting, the Staff presented a replat of the LeMay Lake Hills Project on behalf of a developer who is requesting the conversion of a conventional rental townhouse facility to owner occupancy. Physically, there are no changes to the project; it is merely the process which has to occur in order to convert the plat from rental to owner occupancy. Attached on page /el _ is a copy of the replat converting LeMay Lake Hills. The City Planner will provide any additional comments regarding the procedural transaction for the LeMay Lake Hills Project at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the LeMay Lake Hills conversion of a conventional rental townhouse facility project to that of an owner occupancy. • xx.cr �i mazer ` CT: •�� . vi `sa [ -= �3 Q •� '.a as `� S •�'��;;--ie3"e �,_;:��`_ 9w -f 101 - XAr t,00L:at p • 1- f 101 ,-"N:-7 a Mn 11 101 r _ f N�4ua aaua+.t i 101 N 101 a • -� a 8� » 101 - if 10'7 f N�4ua •_.-� liac M 107 ” • •al It ' tl Lcn s f IY 3. al Lai » 101 - if 10'7 ,•taw �� i »Lal 3. t ail Q '- +l +Y layt.m..al Y \\ 3 3� i \``'• •n _ � .. a_l a 3iI-�_ ,"'✓ •.`. _ y,ta,ara' 11� __[jiltii 02 8 'F+ � �•a;caau:i'' •aytte.aa::5 j vacaa A ~ : y11 119 1011 — � lof Loll of lol ' Nl Kant H,'g iy eee43t1.1,K R.a�.n - Y r w _, _aA• / >.00,OLJt1—l-t4aWa- e"`r�; a� � n d"-10 � '•af'r (fa 1011 ';/j-� ;„•awa .. a, , 4z LD1 ez lal 107 41y4ua.Y.n )_ ttuN_..t LLS loll •l,eaee.+aCp'L-� t< 107 cq lo, Flo/ 12 lol >.ca•atF ��a _ la `l9 laeaet�s.l a.tut..w W J g .K'T�yy - laza�ll sayaawa'�+t �` lnaaNw "II O V / il: l6z loll !z lol 'fit:--,---•—�� oa I —_ �a met.ur a.aw 7t lae�9 -1,;y It lo, lK loll -a `I 1p�Z t 7 I ' '-- _ •' Y em�i 101 I,�ay.s'= 101 �C QaGM �q S ... ' S= y Q • .�j}, i� _ °1 ; - a+al 101 � d I ♦� til"( ,. . � j33 33 tl 107 jpyy „a,a„„+ 0 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Five The Additional Items relating to Public Improvement Contracts and Private Improvement Contracts are listed separate from Consent. However, City staff discussion will be limited on each item unless there is a specific question or questions by the City Council. It is suggested that each item be identified as an Agenda Item and additional discussion will be given by City staff if there are any questions by the City Council. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS Item 1. Contract 87-11, Approve P lans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Greensboro 2nd Addition) --As a result of the public hearing process, the Council authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Greensboro 2nd Addition. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of authorizing the advertisement for formal bids. The Director of Public Works will be available to discuss and further explain the details of this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 87-11 (Greensboro 2nd Addition - streets and utilities) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, May 1, 1987. Item 2. Contract 87-12, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Lexington Square 6th/Northview Park Road) --As a result of the public hearing process, the Council authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Lexington Square 6th Addition incorporating the upgrading of Northview Park Road from Lexington Avenue to Northview Park. These plans have now been completed and are being presented 'to the Council for their review and consideration of authorizing the advertisement for formal bids. The Director of Public Works will be available to discuss and further explain the details associated with this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 87-12 (Lexington Square 6th Addition/Northview Park Road - streets and utilities) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, May 1, 1987. Item 3. Contract 87-14, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Eagan Hills Farm/Country Hallow - Trunk Sanitary Lift Station) -- With the proposed development of the Eagan Hills Farm concept development, Stafford Place, and high school facilities, it is necessary to install the major trunk sanitary sewer lift station in the eastern central portion of the City. Although the public X90 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Six PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS CONTINUED: hearing process has not been completed for the installation of the related trunk infrastructure, it is necessary to proceed with the bid solicitation process for the lift station structure itself due to the 4 - 5 month lead time associated with the manufacturing and installation of the related pump facilities and electrical control panels. Therefore, staff is requesting Council authorization to proceed with the bid solicitation for the equipment only. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further detail this proposed contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 87-14 (Eagan Hills Farm/Country Hallow - trunk sanitary lift station) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, May 1, 1987. Item 4. County Contract 32-18, Approve Plans/Resolution (Cliff Road and Galax ie/B lackhawk Road - Traffic Signals) --We have received the detailed plans from Dakota County for the installation of traffic signals at the above referenced intersection. They are also requesting the City Council to approve the resolution enclosed on page 4qk which is required prior to final state aid approval. These signals will provide for full traffic control at this critical intersection. Left turn movements will be allowed on a left turn arrow only. In the past, the City Council has expressed a concern regarding traffic signal design which does not allow the left turn movement on a green light but rather restricts it to a left turn only on a green arrow indicator. The traffic signals at Cliff Road and Cedar Avenue have been used as an example of the system desirable by the Council. However, the City Police Department has experienced a considerable number of accidents by allowin the more permissible left turn movement. Enclosed on page allow is a copy of a memo received from the Police Department reg rding this matter. Also enclosed is a copy of a letter received from Pete Sorenson, Count Traffic Engineer. This letter is enclosed on pages �through Taking into consideration the time required to approve the plans through the state aid process, ordering and manufacturing the materials and installation, it is anticipated these traffice signals will be operational by late October of this year. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for County Contract 32-18 (Cliff Road and Galaxie/Blackhawk Road - Traffic Signals) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the referenced resolution. i9� nrcni IIrrnu WHEREAS, plans for Project No. 19-632-12 showing proposed traffic signal construction and miscellaneous construction on County State Aid Highway No. 32 within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project have been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved. Dated this day of 1987 CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of City of I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of at a meeting thereof held in the City of Minnesota, on the_ _ _day o 1987, as disclosed by the records of said City n my possession. (SEAL) /7v tit- Clerk 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 police deportment 2 April, 1987 T0: TOM COLBERT FROM: CAPTAIN ASZMANN SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SIGNALS - CLIFF & CEDAR DIFFLEY & CEDAR I have received a request from Patrol to have the above intersections evaluated for left turns onto Cedar Avenue. Apparently we have been called to accidents where the left turning vehicles are not yielding to oncoming traffic, hence causing accidents and near misses. Their concern is the potential of serious injuries with these type of accidents. Thank you, Ken /lb /73 THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY JAY M. BERTHE Chlef of Police PATRICK J. GEAGAN Administrative Captain KENNETH D. ASZMANN of (za an Operations Captain 2 April, 1987 T0: TOM COLBERT FROM: CAPTAIN ASZMANN SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SIGNALS - CLIFF & CEDAR DIFFLEY & CEDAR I have received a request from Patrol to have the above intersections evaluated for left turns onto Cedar Avenue. Apparently we have been called to accidents where the left turning vehicles are not yielding to oncoming traffic, hence causing accidents and near misses. Their concern is the potential of serious injuries with these type of accidents. Thank you, Ken /lb /73 THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY DAKOTA COUNTY DAVID L. EVERDS, P.E. COUNTY ENGINEER HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT (612) 431-1150 7300 WEST 1471h STREET. SUITE h402 APPLE VALLEY. MINNESOTA 5.51:' February 5, 1987 Mr. M. L. Robinson, P.E. District Traffic Engineer Mn/DOT, District 9 3485 Hadley Ave. N. N. St. Paul, MN 55109 Re: Traffic Signal Operation TH 77 at CSAH 32 in Eagan Dear Mike: I have received communication from the Eagan Police Department requesting re-evaluation of the signal operation at the interchange signals. The operation of the signals at the TH 77 interchanges (CSAR 30 and CSAH 32) allows a "permissive/protected" left turn movement from the County roads on to the freeway ramps. This operation is different from the current operating signals at the I -35E interchanges in Eagan. To promote uniformity in the operation of the signals in this area and to address issues of safety problems mentioned by the Eagan Police Department, I request that Mn/DOT study the operation of the signals on TH 77 at CSAH 30 and CSAH 32 to determine whether it would be appropriate to change the signal phasing and displays to a "protected" only left turn opertion. Please contact me if I can provide additional information to you or be of assistance to you on this request. Sincerely, qPetMeL. Sorenson Traffic Engineer PLS/bv cc: Ken Aszmann, Eagan P.D. /V AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER WEL', APR 1. 1987, 1:52 PM ACCIDENTS -CLIFF u 77 PAGE 1 C-uFFENGE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STREET -NAME STREET -TYPE X -ST -NAME X -ST -TYPE DATE -REPORTED CASE -NO PIN -OFFICER BEAT 1424 DIFFLEY RD RAHN RD 870124 0700/407 20 3320 9424 S.Z CLIFF RD HWY 77 370126 8700i491 4 3320 9424 CLIFF RD CLIFF DR 870129 $1001731 0 332?) 9424 DIFFLEY RD NICOLS RD 870130 8101816 10 3320 9424 DIFFLC RD BLACKHAWK RD 870.319 87004942 4 3320 9424 DIFFLEY RD BLACKHAWK RD 870327 9700554E 20 3320 942'6 SANDSTONE DR 810207 87002267 34 3320 9440 SILVER BELL RD BEAU DE RUE DR 870301 8700=345 2 3320 91144 SIBLEY MEMORIAL Hk 870108 87000414 0 3320 9444 CINNAMON RIDGE RD 87000426 23 3320 9444 CLIFF RD SLATERS RD 810109 37000471 to 3320 9444 CLIFF RD NICOLS RD 870122 81001260 4 3320 9444 NICOLS RD 87001274 20 3320 Sa CLIFF RD HWY 77 870125 81001469 17 3320 9444 ERIN DR NICOLS RD 870128 870016i9 16 3320 9444 CLIFF RD NICOLS RD 810129 07001753 22 3320 1444 DIFFLEY RD SIBLEY MEM HW 870206 87002168 4 3320 9444 CLIFF RD RAHN RD 870201 87002227 23 3320 9444 METCALF DR 870221 87003:60 20 3320 94Y4 DIFFLEY RD BLACKHAWK RD 870325 87005'93 6 3320 9444 SILVER BELL RD HWY 13 B10330 87005698 20 3320 9445 MARBLE LA 870118 8700108 B 3320 9445 BEAU DE RUE DR 810129 87001719 6 3320 9446 CEDARVALE SHOP CTR 870318 870048/6 4 3320 94512 DIFFLEY RD THOMAS LAKE RD 870324 87005332 32 3320 9453 VALLEY VIEW DR 870126 87001525 8 3320 9453 `-VALLEY VIEW DR 870211 87002648 17 3320 942 VALLEY VIEW DR RAHN RD 870228 87003765 17 3320 9453 DIFFLEY RD 870309 67AO4337 20 3320 9453 CLIFF RD SLATERS RD 87015 87004680 16 3320 94x-3 BALLANTRAE RD 870316 87004756 18 3320 31r Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Seven PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS CONTINUED: Item 5. Contract 85-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer and Streets) --We have received a request for final payment, via our consultant engineering firm, along with a certification of compliance with City -approved plans and specifications for the installation of the trunk storm sewer through the Cedar Industrial Park, and the installation of streets and utilities necessary for the extension of Blackhawk Road to Kennebec Road. All final inspections have been performed and verified by representatives of the Public Works Department and favorable action for final acceptance and perpetual maintenance is requested. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS final payment for Contract 85-5 sewer and streets) in the amount Inc., and accept the improvements ITEM: To approve the eleventh and (Cedar Industrial Park trunk storm of $9,582.35 to ARI Contracting, for perpetual maintenance. Item 6. Contract 87-1, Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Park Construction for Six Parks) --Plans and specifications have been prepared for Contract 87-1, park construction for six parks, which include Lakeside Park, O'Leary Park, Carnelian Park, Vienna Woods Park, Thomas Lake Park and the recent Northview Addition. Funding for the parks construction is from the 1984 Bond and Park Site Fund. In the case of the Thomas Lake Park, from the LAWCON/LCMR Grant and the Park Site Fund. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans and specifications for Contract 87-1, Parks Construction and for a bid opening on May 1, 1987 at 2:00 p.m. Item 7. Contract 87-13, Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Park Shelter Buildings) --Plans and specifications and construction documents have been prepared for the construction of park shelter buildings for four (4) parks located in Quarry, Carnelian, Walnut Hill and Blue Cross Parks. Funding for the construction is from the 1984 Parks Bond Program. The City used the architectural firm of Schwartz/Weber in 1985/1986 and because the park shelter buildings should not deviate from the plans that were prepared by Schwartz/Weber for other park locations, the architectural firm was contracted on an hourly basis to complete preliminary design and layout work for shelters in the four (4) aforementioned parks. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans and specifications for Contract 87-13, Park Shelter Buildings and for a bid opening on April 30, 1987. 14 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Eight PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS CONTINUED: Item 8. Contract 86-2, Approve Supplemental Agreement #3 (Nicols Road) --Supplemental Agreement (Change Order) #3 is comprised of four parts: Part A: An existing buried box culvert was encountered during .the construction of storm sewer facilities and had to be removed (Add $1,856.25). Part B: Due to the early onset of winter weather, existing commercial business driveways could not be reconstructed and a temporary access had to be provided for those businesses near the intersection of Cliff Road and Nicols Road. (Add $4,069.50). Part C: A groundwater spring condition was encountered near Rahn Park which required the installation of a drain field to dry out the subgrade to allow continued construction. (Add $2,980.00). Part D: During the lowering of an existing water main, a temporary bypass had to be provided to maintain service to the adjacent commercial businesses. (Add $825.00). The total amount of Supplemental Agreement #3 is $9,730.75, which has been reviewed by the Public Works Director and is being recommended for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Supplemental Agreement #3 to Contract 86-2 (Nicols Road) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Item 9. Contract 86-23, Approve Change Order #2 (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) --Change Order #2 consists of three parts described as follows: Part A: The existing subgrade material within the road bed of Oak Pond Road is not suitable for reconstruction during winter conditions. Subsequently, this material had to be replaced with suitable subgrade soil. (Add $1,500.00). Part B: Buried trees and debris were encountered during trench construction in the northeast corner of Cliff and Pilot Knob Road. Extra costs were incurred for its removal and disposal. (Add $2,000.00). Part C: The contract inadvertently omitted the installation of two flared end sections for the storm sewer system. (Add $1,425.17). The total amount of this Change Order is $4,925.17 and has been reviewed in detail by the Director of Public Works and is being recommended for favorable action. 177 Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Nine PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS CONTINUED: ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #2 to Contract 86-23 (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Agenda Information Memo April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Forty PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS B. Private Improvement Contract -- Item 1. Contract 83-F, Final Acceptance (St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition) --We have received a request for final acceptance through our consulting engineering firm along with a certification of compliance to City approved plans and specifications for the installation of streets and utilities within this subdivision. All final inspections have been verified by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Contract 83-F (St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition) and accept those public improvements for perpetual maintenance. Item 2. Contract 85-D, Final Acceptance (Westbury 4th Addition) --We have received a request for final acceptance by the developer through our consulting engineering firm along with the certification of compliance to City approved plans and specifications for the installation of streets and utilities within this subdivision. All final inspections have been verified by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 85-D (Westbury 4th Addition) and accept those public improvements for perpetual maintenance. Item 3. -Contract 85-Q, Final Acceptance (Blackhawk Townhouse Apartments) --We have received a request for final acceptance from the developer through our consulting engineering firm along with the certification of compliance with City approved plans and specifications for the installation of utilities to service the Blackhawk Townhouse Apartments. All final inspections have been verified by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 85-Q (Blackhawk Townhouse Apartments) and accept those improvements for perpetual maintenance. i99