04/07/1987 - City Council RegularAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY HALL
APRIL 7, 1987
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
.� II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL .OF MINUTES
III. 6:40 - TAX ABATEMENTS - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
IV. 6:45 --DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
p-4 A. Parks Department
i5 B. Fire Department
V. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
Z3 A. Personnel Items
.26 B. Plumbers Licenses
,Z91C. New Manager (Liquor License) LaFonda's Restaurant
.70 Resolution Regarding Commercial Recycling
.33 E. Vacate Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Norwest 2nd Addition)
3q F. Approve Final Plat, Fairway Hills
%G. Project 499, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Chapel Hill Baptist
Church)
P.3%H. Project 500, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Briar Oaks of Apple
Valley)
p•37 I. Project 501, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Eagandale Center
Industrial Park 8th Addition)
P7 J`
Approve Final Plat, Lexington Square 6th Addition
.3 . K. Approve Final Plat, Burr Oak Hills Addition
Pp.Z L. Approve Resolution Requesting MnDOT Speed Study/Authorization (Miscellaneous
a�: (
Streets)
VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
VII. OLD BUSINESS
p.46 A. Conditional Use Permit (Blackhawk Plaza, Inc.) to Allow Gas Pumps and Service
B on Se rate Lots at the Blackhawk Plaza at the NE Intersection of
R.
pa
Blackhawk, and Diff ley Roads in the SE1A Sec 32
VIII.
- - NEW BUSS
5y'
A.
-Special Assessments and Water Revenue Bonds Refunding
B.
Variance to Allow a 17' Canopy Setback Variance- Along Pilot Knob Rd for the
SuperAmerica Facility at the SW Intersection of Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle
-P-r,
C.
Road?s
V ti nce To Allow Change in Sideyard Setback -Requirements for Kalvin Hedlund
11
F d Steven Johnson, Lot 6, Block 3, Rahn Ridge Addition
47
D.
Variance to' Al low Change in Frontyard Setback Requirements for Edward L.
Gallagher, Lot 16, Black 5, Cedar Grove 2nd Addition
-F.7 Z
E.
Variance to Allow Change in Frontyard Setback Requirements for Michael Marxer,
Lot 1, Block 1, Greensboro 1st Addition
7 'p /
'�
F.
Waiver of Plat to Allow a Duplex Lot Split for Advance Developers, Inc., at
Lots 1, 4 & 5, Block 1, Suncliff 3rd Addition
G.
Special Permit to Allow One 4' X 8' Two -Directional Signs for Coldwell Banker
at NW1%4 of Section 34
.
H.
Waiver of Plat (James Unker) in order to split Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview
Pg�
Addition, into 2 separate 1/2 acre parcels abutting Cliff Road to the south and
east of Lenore Lane in the SE 1/4 of Sec 29
)a� I.
Preliminary Plat (Overview 2nd Addition - Dunn Real Estate) consisting of (1)
.98 acre lot located on the west side of Dodd Road just north of Golden Meadow
Road in the NW1/4 of Section 25.
J.
Conditional Use Permit (Madison Pizza Corp.) for a drive-thru facility, pylon
sign, and beer sales, located in Lot 2, Block 1, Flour Bin 1st Addition in the
NE1/4 of Section 31.
)Z� K.
Waiver of Plat (Joyce & Reuben Meissner) in order to split Lot 4, Block 1, of
the Killdeer Addition for separate ownership in this (NB) Neighborhood Business
District located in the NW1/4 of Section 12 on the east side of Hwy 149.
ep. 135 L.
Rezoning - Mueller School Site (ISD #196) of 28.43 acres to a Public Facility
Park designation, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Preliminary Plat
for an elementary school located on the north side of Wescott Road east of
Lexington Ave. in the SE1/4 of Section 14.
M.
Replat of the Safari at Eagan Shopping Center (Linvill Properties, Inc.) to the
f
Thomas Lake Center, Safari at Eagan along the north side of Cliff Road, west of
Thomas Lake Road in the SW1/4 of Section 28.
.17 N.
Planned Development Amendment (Winkler Jackson PD - Richard Winkler) - And
Rezoning of (3) R-2 (Duplex) Lots to R-1 (Single Family) on Block 1 of the Oak
Cliff Addition Located West of Slaters Road and South of Cliff Road in the
,175 0.
NW1/4 of Section 31.
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment (Walley & Michael Nelson) and Rezoning o{
110,175
Lot 4, Carlson Acres from R-1 (Single Family) to LB (Limited Business) located
at the SW intersection of Pilot Knob and Diff ley Roads in the NE1A of Sec 20
11
P.
Ordinance Amendment to the City Code, Chapter 11.20 Subdivision 11C, to Require
Service Bays in General Business Districts with Motor Fuel Sales.
Q.
Replat (LeMay Lake Hills - Al Kempf) of a Townhouse Project to Convert from
Rental to Owner Occupancy Status, Located in the NW 1/4 Section 10, at the SE
Intersection of Pilot Knob and Lone Oak Roads.
I%. - ADDITIONAL ITEMS
A. Public Improvement Contracts
-p,J9a 1. Contract 87-11, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Greensboro 2nd Addition)
r ((70 2. Contract 87-12, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Lexington Square
�• 6th/Northview Park Road)
170 3. Contract 87-14, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Eagan Hills Farm/Country
Hallow)
�Jq 4. County Contract 32-18, Approve Plans/Resolution (Cliff and Galaxie Signals)
•,�� b 5. Contract 85-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storr
Sewer and Streets)
6. Contract 87-1, Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize Ad for Bids (Park
I Construction for Six Parks)
�•J56 7. Contract 87-13, Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize Ad for Bids
'Q (Park Shelter Buildings)
I 8. Contract 86-2, Approve Supplemental Agreement #3 (Nicols Road)
7 9. Contract 86-23, Approve Change Order #2 (Holland Lake Outlet)J,
B. Private Improvement Contracts x�
'p 19 1. Contract -83-F, Final Acceptance (St.Francis Woods 3rd Add)
�•1� q 2. Contract 85-D, Final Acceptance (Westbury 4th Addition)
�rG p 3. Contract 85-Q, Final Acceptance (Blackhawk Townhouse Apts)
X. ! 1 - VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
%I. - ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 4, 1987
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION
APPROV& MINUTES/AGEND
After approval is given to the April 7, 1987, agenda and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the March 17, 1987 meeting, the
following items are noted for consideration:
MAD6. ASATMl4EN;T ,DACC A* C ' A SESSOR: OM, -
There were two tax abatements presented to the City for properties
described as Parcel 10-72988-120-02 and the property owner is Dennis
and Nancy Raas and the second parcel is described as 10-84473-010-01
and the property owners are Dan and Patricia Dee. Mr. Bill Peterson
of the Dakota County Assessors Office is planning to be present to
review the two (2) tax abatements with the City Council.
RAAS PROPERTY
The tax abatement as requested for Dennis and Nancy Raas property
was described as follows by the assessor's office: "upon review of
the property, it was found that a mathematical error in calculating
the square footage was done. It should be less than the
aforementioned. Therefore, the estimated market value should be
reduced from $110,800 to $91,600 and the assessed valuation should
be reduced from $24,524 to $19,148 for 1986, taxes payable in 1987.
DEE PARCEL
Upon review of the property the valuation should have been at 75%
completion instead of 100%. Therefore, the estimated market value
should be reduced from $106,300 to $76,500 and the assessed value
should be reduced from $26,514 to $18,170 for 1986, taxes payable in
1987."
The Engineering Department has prepared a map that indicates the
loc-ation of each parcel and a copy or copies are enclosed on page
or pages 7- through �.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE MATTER: To approve or deny the tax
abatement for 1) the Dennis and Nancy Raas property and 2) the Dan
and Patricia Dee property.
U
Parcel No. 10-84473-010-01
Dan & Patricia Dee
Z.-
c�
cc
w
F_.
u
Lu
v
4J
U.
LJ
ry
Parcel No. 10-72988-120-02
Dennis & Nancy Raas
Agenda Information Memo
April 4, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Two
A. PARRS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Item 1. Highview Park Skating Rink -- The Parks and Recreation
Commission is recommending that the City abandon continued
maintenance of the hockey building and shelter building at Highview
Park. In place of the hockey, rink and shelter building, the City
would provide an open skating area in Highview Park. For additional
information on this item refer to a memo prepared by the Director of
Parks and Recreation which is enclosed on pages through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission recommendation to
discontinue the hockey rink and shelter building in Highview Park
and maintain the same area as an open skating area in future years.
d
MEMO TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
THOMAS L. HEDGES/CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN VRAA/DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: MARCH 11, 1987
SUBJECT; HIGHVIEW PARK SKATING RINK
Attached is a staff memorandum to the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission pertaining to Highview Skating Rink.
The issue is relative to whether the City should continue to
maintain a hockey rink and a shelter building at Highview Park or to
discontinue operation of these facilities in the future years.
Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Action: The Commission
reviewed the staff report dated March 2nd and after discussion
recommended to the City Council that the hockey rink and park
shelter building be removed from the park. In it's place, the
Commission recommended that an open skating area be maintained.
Benches for outside skate changing and adaptation for the lighting
fixtures be made to facilitate this open skating rink operation.
The Commission made the recommendation to eliminate the hockey
facility because of the expense involved for replacement of the
hockey boards and shelter building estimated at between thirty two
thousand and thirty six thousand dollars. Further, that the limited
use of the facility did not warrant this replacement particularly
since the City will be -constructing two new hockey facilities at
Quarrey Hill Park and approving the skating facility at Pilot Knob
Park.
For Council Action: To approve/disapprove of the Advisory Parks and
Recreationommission's actions regarding Highview Rink or to make a
subsequent/1re/ommendat ion.
Director of Parks & Recreation
Attachments
KV/af
MENTO TO: -ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: MARCH 2, 1987
HE: HIGHVIEW SKAT12IG RINK
The purpose of this agenda item is to discuss the continuation of maintaining
the warming house/shelter building at Highview Park for future skating
seasons.
AAMrRnn"
Highview Park has had an open skating and hockey rink for a number of years.
The warming house is a "temporary" facility, with an estimated age of fourteen
to fifteen years. The building is now in generally poor condition.
Skating attendance at Highview Park has been historically very, very low.
Three years ago, the department discontinued having the shelter building open
on Mondays through Thursdays during school days. An attendant was assigned
on weekends and during Christmas vacation hours. Broomball games have been
scheduled at this rink on Sundays and Mondays in an attempt to make use of
this facility, and to alleviate burdens at other facilities. Staff
anticipates that broomball will be moving to Quarry Park for the 1987/88
winter season.
FACILITY CONDITIONS
The warming house at Highview is in poor condition. The structure is
approximately fourteen years old, and was considered a temporary facility at
the time it was placed in the park. The hockey rink is in very poor
condition, with the hockey boards falling in, as a result of soil conditions
pushing against the exterior of the boards. Staff has attempted to repair the
boards repeatedly, but the rotting wood timbers often failed to hold the nails
securely. Little more can be done to repair the boards, unless a complete
replacement/rebuilding is done. Maintenance Staff have expressed concern for
safety of the hockey rink users, because of loose boards, etc.
The hockey lights are in fair to good condition, certainly adequate for
today's needs.
COST
As stated before, the rink is attended at a lesser schedule than other
facilities. Attendant cost is programmed at 280/300 hours per season, or
$1,250/$1,500 per season.
Staff does not have a cost for ice maintenance, but it is assumed to be very
comparable with most other skating locations within the community.
ATTENDANCE
Attendance again this year reflects very few skaters. Even during Christmas
vacation, and on days in which other facilities note a significant number of
skaters, this site continues to record low attendance.
ISSUE
At issue is a continuation of this facility at it's current programming level.
With the moving of broomball from Highview to Quarry Park, use of this
facility will continue to drop. As noted previously, there is relatively
little attendance at this facility. This, combined with the issue of
expensive replacement of the hockey rink and warming house facility; staff
questions whether it is the desire and direction of the Commission to
continue use, or to provide an alternate service.
Replacement of the hockey rink and the warming houses is estimated at
approximately $32,000 to $36,000 for the building and hockey rink.
Open skating could continue with the City maintaining a pleasure skating rink,
but removing both the hockey and warming house facility. This would be
similar to the situation at Cedar Pond Park and Country Home. Lighting of the
area could be accomplished with the use of an electric eye or timing clock for
turning on/off of the lights.
Another alternative would be to simply remove the hockey rink, warming house,
and lights, and discontinue this park for open skating altogether.
SUMMATION
There has been limited use of Highview Park for open skating. Hockey boards
and the warming house are in poor condition. Replacement of both would be
necessary if the City is to continue use of the site at it's present level of
service. Repair is not an option, unless it would be extensive, because of
the rotting wood and expense involved relative to the benefit. One option is
to remove the hockey rink and warming house, but maintain the pleasure
skating area.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION
To recommend (a) replacement of the building and hockey rink, (b) remove the
warming house and hockey rink in favor of maintaining a pleasure skating rink
only, (c) remove the warming house and hockey rink, and discontinue the use
of the site for a winter skating facility.
7 2
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Three
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS CONTINUED:
Item 2. Bid Approval for Mowing Equipment --The Director of Parks
and Recreation has completed a bidding process for the replacement
of two (2) existing Toro Groundmaster units and the acquisition of
an additional unit. The existing units were purchased in 1978/1979.
The original intent for the 1987 budget was to trade in the basic
units, removing a cab and broom attachment from one unit for reuse
due to the fact that they were in good serviceable condition.
Bidding was performed cooperatively with the city of Burnsville.
For additional information on this item and background information
on the com etitive bidding process, please refer to pages _
through The Director of Parks and Recreation will be resent
9 P
at the mee ing on Tuesday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the bids for
replacement of two (2) Toro Groundsmaster mowing units.
A I
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
PZY FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
DATE: MARCH 31, 1987
RE: BID APPROVAL - MOWING EQUIPMENT
BACKGROUND:
The City Council has approved the replacement of two existing Toro
Groundsmaster units and the acquisition of an additional unit. The existing
units were purchased in 1978 and 1979. Staff's original intent was to trade
in the basic units, removing a cab and broom attachment from one unit for re-
use due to the fact that they were in good, serviceable condition. Bidding
was done cooperatively with the City of Burnsville. This City will retain
three (3) other Toro units, which have been purchased in the last four years.
COMPETITIVE BIDDERS
John Deere Company has recently become a strong, competitive bidder against
the Toro product. Although, the John Deere machine has been on the market for
some time, it has only recently modified it's design to become very similar to
the Toro product. This no doubt, in order to compete "head on" with the Toro
unit. Toro has long been considered the standard of the industry. John
Deere has also taken on an "aggressive" position in bidding it's equipment, in
order to gain a market foothold. This aggressive bidding has worked to the
advantage of purchasers of mowing equipment, as the price submitted by Toro is
substantially less than that which was quoted the last time the City received
bids for identical Toro equipment.
COMPARISONS
Staff has done a comparative analysis between the two machines. Due to the
fact that John Deere has designed their machines after the Toro unit, there is
very little difference between the two units. Please see the attached
memorandum from John VonDeLinde, which details these differences.
The biggest issue that staff has identified is a lack of interchangeability
between the attachments of the Toro unit and that of the John Deere. That is,
the brooms, blower, and R.O.P.S cab are not compatible and can not be
switched between units. This is of significant importance to the department
in instances whereby the basic unit i.e., prime mover, breaks down and a
switching between the prime mover and the attachments need to be made to
accomplish the work needed. Please keep in mind that the City will still
retain three (3) Groundsmasters.
7
The second significant difference is in the size of the mowing deck. John
Deere is 88" versus 76" for Toro. This size difference is significant,
because the City trailers which are used to transport the groundsmasters are
not able to accept the larger 88" deck size. Larger trailers would have to be
purchased to accept these units if the bid is awarded to John Deere.
BID PRICES
Bids were opened and the results were tabulated as follows:
TORO JOHN DEERE NET DIFFERENCE
Base Bid $21,576. $21,090. $1486.
Attachments 7,673. 6,889. 784.
Sub Total 29,249. 27,979. $1,270.
BID ANALYSIS
The bid by John Deere is $486.00 lower than Toro for the base bid, and with
the various attachments that are required, would total $1,270.00 less than
Toro.
Toro and John Deere have offered trade-in of $5,700 and $7,400 respectively.
This widens the net difference between the two bids to $2,970. However, due
to the original bid specifications, it was intended that the department make
use of existing attachments, therefore, would be an additional cost of $1,952.
to bring the John Deere equipment into a workable condition for intergration
into the department. Thus, the total net difference between Toro and John
Deere of $1,018., would be in favor of the John Deere unit.
STAFF DISCUSSION
Although, the acquisition of the John Deere units would be approximately
$1,000 less in cost, several concerns remain:
1. Lack of compatibility between the attachment of the John Deere and Toro
units.
2. Mowing decks of the John Deere being larger, are not compatible with
existing trailers.
3. A change to John Deere would require the City to add to it's inventory of
spare parts needed to maintain the John Deere equipment.
/6
It is staff's opinion that any savings achieved in the acquisition of the John
Deere units will be more than lost, in the creation of a minimal inventory of
necessary spare parts for the John Deere units. Combined with the other two
issues previously mentioned, staff's opinion is that it would cost the City
more to acquire the John Deere units than is saved in the bid price.
Consequently, in the best interests of the City, staff is recommending that
the bid award be made to Toro, MTI, Incorporated. The bids received are
within the budgeted amount.
FOR COUNCIL ACTION
To award the bid for the mowing equipment in the best interest of the City.
KV/bls
Attachments
MEMO TO: 1987 EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION FILE
FROM: JOHN VONDELINDE, SUPERINTENDENT OF PARRS
DATE: MARCH 3, 1987
SUBJECT: ANALYSIS OF JOHN DEERE RIDING MOWERS
The Cities of Eagan and Burnsville are currently preparing
specifications for the acquisition of new 1987 rotary type, 72-
inch,,riding lawn mowers. Both Cities have used Toro
Groundsmaster lawn mowers as their primary turf maintenance
equipment. Both Cities have had a good track record with the
Toro and are writing specifications around that unit. Analysis
of the market, however, has shown that the John Deere Corporation
is manufacturing a unit with similar features and capabilities.
This memo will attempt to outline the staff's analysis of the
John Deere mower and point out difficulties of integrating the
John Deere mower with the City's current fleet.
John Deere vs. Toro Groundsmaster - Features
Analysis of the John Deere line by City staff has revealed the
following perceived advantages.
1. Larger fuel system, i.e., 11 gallons vs. 8.5 gallons
2. Power steering as a standard feature (although this may be a
disadvantage during snow removal on ice).
3. ROPS cab is roomier and provides better visability.
4. Access to the battery and other instrument components appears
to be easier with the John Deere.
5. 72 -inch deck offers heavier gauge steel and heavier blades.
6. Deck lift is higher, providing easier accessibility over
curbs.
7. Prime mover offers quick couple linkup to accessories.
8. Forward and reverse speeds are controlled by a two -pedal
system (this would appear to cut down on employee fatigue).
However, some employees indicated a preference for the one -
pedal system.
9. Cruise control is a standard feature.
Staff also noted the following disadvantages associated with the
John Deere mower.
1. Top speed on the mower unit is 7 miles per hour. This could
place potential limitations on time efficiency of the mower
in open mowing conditions. /Z
1987 EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION FILE
MARCH 3, 1987
PAGE TWO
2. The hydrostatic and other mechanical systems require the use
of three different types of fluids. In contrast, the Toro
uses one type of fluid in all systems.
3. The rear wheels on the mowing deck are significantly smaller
and contain no grease zerks. This may increase the potential
for turf damage in wet conditions.
4. The mowing deck on the 72 -inch unit is a unibody
construction. There is no flip -up chute which is useful
during tall grass conditions.
5. This is the first year that John Deere has used a diesel
engine. Though it is equivalent in horse power, it does not
have a demonstrated track record.
Integration Of John Deere Line
A review of the specifications and field tests indicates that
both machines have comparable qualities and features. However,
the greatest drawback would appear to be integration of the John
Deere line into the existing line of prime movers and attachments
in the City fleet. Problems associated with integration include:
1. The fixed deck on the John Deere 72 -inch mower has a width of
88". This width would preclude the loading of this deck onto
existing trailers. The capacity of current trailers is a
maximum of -84".
2. The John Deere mowing deck is a right discharge design; the
Toro is a left discharge design. This contrary design
feature would create conflicts of use between these mowers at
the same site.
3. Acceptance of the John Deere mower would necessitate the
purchase of additional inventory repair supplies. This would
create an additional up -front expense for the City of $1,500
to $2,000.
4. Additional commitments of staff time would be required to
educate and train employees on routine preventative
maintenance and repairs. Associated paperwork related to
maintenance would also increase.
5. The flexiblility and compatibility of accessories (mowing
decks, snow blowers, and brooms) would be reduced with the
addition of the John Deere line. John Deere accessories are
not compatible with Toro prime movers and vice versa. This
factor would have the net result of decreasing the efficiency
of the fleet and accessories. Interchangeability of
accessories between machines would be more restrictive with
the addition of a new line of mowing equipment.
/3
1987 EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION FILE
MARCH 3, 1987
PAGE THREE
6. Included in the City's current mower fleet are four ROPS
cabs, two brooms, and two snow blowers. The acquisition of a
non -Toro line would leave the City with three Toro mowers.
This would necessitate the trade-in of one ROPS cab and at
least one attachment. In exchange, the City would be put in
a position of acquiring a new ROPS cab and at least one new
accessory for the new acquisitions (John Deere). This would
be an additional unanticipated cost of accepting a non -Toro
product. The net result would be an increase of $2,000 to
$3,000 in additional cost to the City. All existing cabs and
accessories are in good working order.
Conclusion
An analysis of the Toro Groundsmaster and John Deere mowers
indicates a comparability in standard equipment and features.
John Deere has made several modifications in the past few years
to bring it in closer line with Toro specifications. Despite
these specifications, the Toro line continues to demonstrate a
solid reputation with years of dependable service to our City.
While John Deere may offer a comparable product, its newness on
the market raises some questions about life expectancy.
The addition of the John Deere line to the existing fleet raises
concerns relative to compatibility of accessories, conflicts in
mowing deck design, adaptability to existing trailers, added
expenses in inventory control, additional staff commitments for
training and maintenance documentation, costs of trading in
useable equipment, and lack of a lengthy service record on the
John Deere mower and drive train components.
a
Superintenden
Parks
cc: Jim McGuffee, Park Supervisor
Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation
J V/mc/af
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Four
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS CONTINUED:
B. FIRE DEPARTMENT:
Item 1. Fire Department Business -- During the fall of 1986,
action was taken to pursue site locations for Fire Stations 4 and 5,
hire an architect to begin design work and cost estimates for Fire
Station 4 and direct the Fire Department Building Committee to
review station aides as well as equipment needs. It was anticipted
that a land acquisition specifically for Fire Station 4 and
selection of an architect would be completed between the months from
January through March and a referendum held in the late spring so
that Fire Station 4 can be constructed during this calendar year.
The City has retained their architectural services of Art Dickey &
Associates who has specialized in the design and construction of
fire stations. They have completed conceptual design work and cost
estimates for Fire Station 4. The City has offered a purchase
agreement for the acquisition of Fire Station 4 and is hopeful that
that purchase agreement will be executed within the next several
days.
At a special City Council Work Session held on Tuesday, March 31, it
was determined that City Council would consider at the April 7 City
Council Meeting 1) setting the bond referendum date for May 26 and
2) decide the amount in question that will appear on the referendum.
A representative of the architectural firm, fire chief and City
Administrator will provide further information on the cost and
present a design concept for Fire Station 4 at the meeting on
Tuesday. As a part of the action for the May 26 meeting, specific
direction should be given to the City Attorney to draft a specific
question or questions that will appear on the May 26 ballots.
Enclosed on pages__ through.._ is a copy of a memo written by
the Director of Finance that includes debt schedules prepared by
Miller and Schroeder.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) establish Tuesday, May 26,
as the date for a special election to consider a bond referendum for
a new fire station or fire stations, 2) direct the City Attorney to
prepare the questions for the referendum which will be considered at
the April 21 meeting.
15
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE
DATE: APRIL 3, 1987
SUBJECT: 1987 FIRE STATION, LAND AND EQUIPMENT BONDS
Per your request, I have assembled some information regarding
debt service schedules, mill rates and taxes payable for two
different -sized issues, each with 15 and 20 -year amortization
schedules.
Amounts were determined as follows:
ISSUE SIZE #1:
Land (Station 4)
$ 50,000
Land (Station 5)
75,000
Building & Furnishings (Station 4)
430,000
Pumpers (3)
525,000
Issue 1 Subtotal
$1,080,000
Issuance Costs
70,000
Bond Sale Total
$1,150,000
ISSUE SIZE #2:
Number 1 Subtotal
$1,080,000
Building & Furnishings (Station 5)
430,000
Pumper (1) and Equipment
210,000
Issue 2 Subtotal
$1,720,000
Issuance Costs
80,000
Bond Sale Total
$1,800,000
Miller and Schroeder was asked to run the debt service schedules
based on a Summer or Fall 1987 issuance with the first tax
installment collected in 1988 and the first principal payment
made February 1, 1989. The schedules as attached show interest
payments in 1988 which would not work unless the bond amounts
were increased to include money for those interest payments. I
do not believe this causes a problem for the current comparative
purposes of these schedules but it would have to be addressed.
The schedules also assume relatively level debt service payments
over the 15 or 20 -year periods; consequently, any increase to
total City assessed valuation would reduce the mill rate or taxes
payable for any particular property owner. The other option, of
course, would be to estimate an overall increase to assessed
valuation and increase the debt service payments each year over
the life of the bonds to maintain a constant mill rate or taxes
payable amount. As you recall, the latter method was used with
the 1984 Park Improvement Bonds while the Municipal Center
Expansion Bonds follow the first method.
1987 FIRE STATION, LAND & EQUIPMENT BONDS
APRIL 3, 1987
PAGE TWO
The following table summarizes the impacts of these two different
sized issues based on these assumptions:
$1,150,000 Issue (#1) $1,800,000 Issue (#2)
15 Yr. Amt. 20 Yr. Amt. 15 Yr. Amt. 20 Yr. Amt.
Approximate Annual
Installment (Excluding
1988 Interest as Shown)
Net Interest Rate
Average Bond Life
Assessed Valuation for
1987 Taxes Payable (1)
Estimated Assessed
Valuation for 1988
Taxes Payable
(Approx. 10% Increase)
Mill Rate for 1988 Taxes
Payable
Annual Dollar Impact On
$80,000 Market Value
House (2)
Annual Dollar Impact On
$100,000 Market Value
House (2 )
125,000
105,000
195,000
165,000
6.255%
6.596%
6.252%
6.5920
8.91 yrs.
12.29 yrs.
8.89 yrs.
12.26 yrs.
$270,660,726
$300,000,000
.417 .350 .650 .550
$7 $6 $10 $9
$9 $8 $14 $12
(1) Net of fiscal disparities contribution, effect of distribution is not
considered.
(2) Calculated for taxes payable with estimated 1988 mill rates above with
no state law changes.
17
1987 FIRE STATION, LAND & EQUIPMENT BONDS
APRIL 3, 1987
PAGE THREE
It would also be appropriate to consider selling the bonds at two
different times if the second option were chosen. Voter approval
can be given up to a specific dollar amount but that amount does not
have to be sold at one time. The current tax law makes it
impractical to issue bonds unless the proceeds can be spent within
six (6) months.
Please let me know if you would like any additional information or
if you would like to discuss this in more detail.
Financ Director/City Clerk
EJV/af
$1,150,000 G.O. Fire Station Bonds of 1987
City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota
Debt Service Schedule
Issue Date:
8/01/87
Settlement Date:
8/01/87
First Coupon:
/01/88
Estimated
Date
-----
Principal
---------
Coupon
------
Interest
--------
Debt Service
------------
2/01/88
0.00
0.000
34,05B.75
34,05B.75
8/01/88
0.00
0.000
34, 058. 75
34, 058.75
2/01/89
55, 000, 00
4.300
34, 058. 75
89, 058. 75
8/01/89
0.00
0.000
32, 876. 25
32, 876. 25
2/01/90
60, 000. 00
4.600
32, 876. 25
92,B76.25
8/01/90
0.00
0.000
31, 496. 25
31, 496.25
2/01/91
65, 000. 00
4.900
31,496.25
96, 496. 25
8/01/91
0.00
0.000
29, 903. 75
29, 903. 75
2/01/92
65, 000. 00
5.100
29, 903. 75
94,903.75
8/01/92
0.00
0.000
28,246.25
2B,246.25
2/01/93
70, 000. 00
5.300
28, 246. 25
98, 246. 25
8/01/93
0.00
0.000
26, 391. 25
26,391.25
2/01/94
75, 000. 00
5.500
26, 391.25
101, 391.25
8!01/94
0.0141
0. 000
24, 326. 75
24, 328. 75
2/01/95
75, 000. 00
5.750
24,328.75
99, 328. 75
8/01/95
0.00
0.000
22, 172. 50
22, 172. 50
2/01/96
80, 000. 00
6.000
22, 172. 50
102, 172. 50
8/01/96
0.00
0.000
19, 772. 50
19, 772. 50
2/01/97
85, 000. 00
6.200
19, 772. 50
104, 772. 50
8/01/97
0.00
0.000
17, 137. 50
17, 137.50
2/01/98
921, 000. 00
6.400
17, 137. 50
107, 137. 50
8/01/96
0.00
0.000
14,257.50
14, 257.50
2/01/99
95, 000. 00
6.500
14, 257. 50
109. 257. 50
8/01/9.9
0.014)
0.000
11, 170.00
11, 170.00
2/01/00
105, 000. 00
6.600
11, 170. 00
116, 170. 00
8/01/00
0.00
0. 000
7,705.00
7,705.00
2/01/01
110, 000. 00
6.700
7,705.00
117. 705. 00
8/01/01
0.00
0.000
4,020.00
4,020.00
2/01/02
120, 000. 00
6.700
4, 020. 00
124, 020. 00
TOTALS 1,
150, 000. 00
641, 131. 25
1,791,131.25
Accrued Interest tc. 8/01/87 =
0.00
Total Bond Years =
10250.
Grass Interest Cast = $
641,131.25
Average Coupon
6.2255%
NIC =
6.255%
Average Life
=
8.91
Years
Discount @ 100.000
0.00
File: fi.dbt
Prepared by MILLER R SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 4/02/87
/9
��.^1.>:s-•''37�. mac.,?d'-;Y'S^5r E"u,�i�k.iY r ..ts t:,w:.i � ir;yc,�-+'�
$1.150.000 G.O. Fire Station Bonds of 1987
City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota
Debt Service Schedule
Issue Date:
8/01/87
Settlement Date:
8/01/87
First Coupon:
2/01/B8
Estimated
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Debt Set -vice
2/01/8B
0.00
0.000
36, 168.75
36,1E3.75
8/01/88
0.00
0.000
36, 168.75
36, 168.75
2/01/89
35, 000. 00
4.300
36, 168.75
71, 168. 75
8/01/89
0.00
0.000
35,416.25
35,416.25
2/01/90
35, 000. 00
4.600
35,416.25
70, 416. 25
8/01/90
0.00
0. 000
34, 611.25
34, 611. 25
2/01/91
40, 000. 00
4.900
34, 611.25
74, 611.25
8/01/91
0.00
0.000
33, 631.25
33, 631.25
2/01/92
40, 000. 00
5.100
33, 631.25
73, 631.25
8/01/92
0. 00
0.000
329611.25
32,611.25
2/01/93
40, 000. 00
5.300
32, 611.25
72, 611.25
8/01/93
0.00
0.000
31, 551.25
31, 551.25
2/01/94
45, 000. 00
5.500
31, 551.25
76, 551.25
8/01/94
0.00
0.000
30, 313. 75
30, 313. 75
2/01/93
45, 000.00
5.750
30,313.75
75, 313. 75
8/01/95
0.00
0.000
29, 020.00
29, 020. 00
2/01/96
50, 000.00
6.000
29, 020. 00
79.020.00
8/01/96
0.00
0.000
27, 520. 00
27, 520. 00
2/01/97
55, 000. 00
6.200
27, 520. 00
82,520.00
8/01/97
0.00
0.000
25,815.00
25, 815. 00
2/01/98
55, 000. 00
6.400
25, 815. 00
80, 815. 00
8/01/98
0. 00
0.000
c4, 055. 00
E4, 055. 00
2/01/99
60, 01-1)0. 00
6.500
24, 055. 00
84, 055. 00
8/01/99
0.00
0. 000
22, 105. 00
22, 105. 00
2/01/00
65, 000. 00
6.600
22,105.00
87, 105. 00
8/01/00
0.00
0. 000
19, 960. 00
19, 960. 00
2/01/01
70, 000. 00
6.700
19, 960. 00
89, 960. 00
8/01/01
0.00
0.000
17, 615. 00
17, 615. 00
2/01/02
75, 000. 00
6. 700
17, 615. 014)
92, 615. 00
8/01/02
0.00
0.000
15, 102. 50
15, 102. 50
2/01/03
75, 000. 00
6.800
15, 102. 50
90, 102,. 50
3/01/03
0.00
0.000
12, 552. 50
12, 55-2. 50
2/01/04
80, 000. 00
6.800
1'2, 552. 50
92, 552. 50
81clI/04
0.00
0.000
9,a32.50
9, 532. 50
2/01/05
909 000. 00
6.900
9, 832. 50
99, 832. 50
8/01/05
0. 00
0.000
6,727.50
6,727.50
2/01/06
95, 000. 00
6.900
6, 727. 50
101, 727. 50
8/01/06
0.00
0.000
3, 450. 00
3,450.00
2/01/07
------------------------------------------------------------------
100, 000. 00
6.900
3,450.00
103, 450. 00
TOTALS 1, 150, 000. 00
932, 286. 25
2,082,286.25
Accrued Interest to 8/01/87
=
0.00
Tc,tal Bond Years =
14135.
Gross Interest Cost = $
9:;'._,'286.25
Average Coupon
6.596%
NIC =
F. 596%
Average Life
=
12. 29 Years
Discount @ 100.000
0.00
File: f3.dbt
Prepared by MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 4/02/87
�b
$1,800,000 G.O. Fire Station Bands of 1987
City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota
Debt Service Schedule
Issue Date:
8/01/87
Settlement Date:
8/01/87
First Coupon:
2/01/88
Est imat ed
Date
principal
Coupon
Interest
Debt Service
2/01/88
0.00
0.000
53,:_70.00
53,270.00
8/01/88
0.00
1-11.00141
53, 270. 00
5-3,270.00
2/01/89
'30,000.00
4.300
53,270.00
143, 270. 00
8/01/89
0.00
0. u}QJ0
51, 335. 00
51, 335. 00
/01/90
95, 000.00
4.600
51, 335. 00
146. 335. 00
8/01/90
0.00
0.000
49, 150. 00
49, 150. 00
2/01/91
100, 000. 00
4.900
49, 150. 00
149, 150. 00
8/01/91
0.00
0.000
46, 700. 00
46, 700. 00
2/01/92
100, 000. 00
5.100
46, 700. 00
146, 700. 00
8/01/92
0.00
0.000
44, 150.00
44, 150.00
2/01/93
110, 00k1. 00
5.300
44, 150. 00
154, 150. 00
8/01/93
0.00
0.000
41, 235.00
41,235.00
2/01/94
115, 000. 00
5.500
41, 235. 00
156, 235. 00
8/01194
0. 00
0.000
38, 072. 50
3" 072. 50
2/01/95
120, 000. 00
5.750
38, 072. 50
158, 072. 50
8/01/95
0.00
0.000
34.622.50
3.4.622.50
2/01/96
1259 000. 00
6.000
155, 622. 50
8101196
0.00
0.000
30, 872. 50
30, 872. 50
2/01/97
135, 000. 00
6.200
30,872.50
165. 872. 5u'1
8/01/97
0.00
0.000
26, 687. 50
26, 687. 50
2/01/98
145, 000. 00
6.400
26, 687. 50
171, 687. 50
8/01/98
0.00
0. 000
22. 047. 50
22, 047. 50
2/01/99
150, 000. 00
6.500
22, 047. 50
172, 047. 50
8/01/99
0.00
0.000
1.7, 172.50
17, 172.50
2/01/00
160, 000. 00
6.600
17, 172. 50
177, 172. 50
8/01/00
0. 00
0.000
11,892.50
11,892.50
2/01/01
170, 000. 00
6.700
11, 892. 50
181, 892. 50
8/01/01
0.00
0.000
6,197.50
6,197.50
2/01/02
-------------------------------------------------------------------
185, 000.00
6.700
6,197.50
191, 197.50
TOTALS 1, 800, 0021. 00
1,
000, 080. 00
2, 800. 080. 00
Accrued Interest to 8/01/87 =
0.00
Total Bond Years =
15995.
Br. s Interest Cost = $
1, 000, 080. 00
Average Coupon
6.232%
NIC =
6.25'2-/.
Average Life
=
8.89
Years
Discount @ 100.000
0.00
File: f2.dbt
Prepared by MILLER R SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 4/02:/87
Issue Date:
Settlement Date:
First Coupon:
$1,800,000 G.O. Fire Station Bonds of 1987
City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota
Debt Service Schedule
8/01/87
8/01/87
2/01/88
Interest to 8/01/87 =
Total Bond Years =
Grass Interest Cost = b
Average Coupon
NIC =
Average Life =
Discount C@ 100.000
0.00
22065.
1, 454, 623. 75
6.592%
6.592%
12.26 Years
0.00
File: f4. dbt
Prepared by MILLER K SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 4/02/87
z7-
Estimated
Principal
---------
Coupon
------
Interest
--------
Debt Service
------------
---------
0. 00
------
0.000
--------
56, 571.25
------------
56, 571.25
0.00
0.000
56, 571.25
56, 571.25
55, 000. 00
4.300
56, 571.25
111, 571.25
0.00
-0.000
55, 388. 75
55, 388. 75
55, 000. 00
4.600
55, 388. 75
110, 388. 75
0.00
0.000
54, 123. 75
54, 123. 75
60, 000. 00
4.900
54, 123. 75
114, 123. 75
0.00
0.000
52, 653. 75
52, 653. 75
65, 000. 00
5.100
52, 653. 75
117, 653. 75
0.00
0.000
50, 996. 25
50, 996. 25
65, 000.00
5.300
50, 996. 25
115, 996. 25
0.00
0.000
49, 273. 75
49, 273. 75
70, 000.00
5.500
49, 273. 75
119, 273. 75
0.00
0.000
47, 348. 75
47, 348. 75
75, 000. 00
5.750
47, 348. 75
122, 348. 75
0.00
0.000
45, 192. 50
45, 192. 50
80, 000.00
6.000
45, 192. 50
125, 192. 50
0.00
.0. 000
42, 792. 50
42, 792.50
85, 000. 00
6.200
42, 792. 50
127, 792. 50
0.00
0.000
40, 157. 50
40, 157.50
85, 000. 00
6.400
40, 157. 50
125, 157.50
0.00
0.1000
37, 437. 50
37, 437.50
95, 000. 00
6.500
37, 437. 50
132, 437. 50
0.00
0.000
34, 350. 00
34, 350. 00
100, 000. 00
6.600
34, 350. 00
134, 350. 00
0.00
0.000
31, 050. 00
31, 050. 00
105, 000. 00
6.700
--1,050.00
136, 050.00
0.00
0.000
27,532.50
27, 532. 50
i 15, 000. 00
6.700
27, 532. 50
142, 532. 50
0.00
0.000
23, 680. 00
23, 680. 00
120, 000. 00
6.800
23, 680. 00
143, 680. 00
0.00
0.000
19, 600. 00
19, 600. 00
130, 000. 00
6.800
19, 600. 00
149, 600. 00
0.00
0.000
15, 180. 00
15, 180. 00
140, 000. 00
6.900
15, 180. 00
155, 180. 00
0.00
0.000
10, 350. 00
10, 050. 00
145, 000. 00
6.900
10, 350. 00
155, 350. 00
0.00
0.000
5,347.50
5,347.50
155, 000. 00
-------------------------------------------------------
6.900
5,347.50
160, 347. 50
-------------------------------------------------------
1, 800, 000. 00
1, 454, 623.75
3,254,623.75
Interest to 8/01/87 =
Total Bond Years =
Grass Interest Cost = b
Average Coupon
NIC =
Average Life =
Discount C@ 100.000
0.00
22065.
1, 454, 623. 75
6.592%
6.592%
12.26 Years
0.00
File: f4. dbt
Prepared by MILLER K SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 4/02/87
z7-
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Five
There are twelve (12) items on the
agenda referred
to as consent items
requiring
one (1) motion by the
City Council.
If the City Council
wishes to
discuss any of these
items in further
detail, the items
should be
removed from the
Consent Agenda
and placed under
Additional
Items unless the discussion required
is brief.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
A. Personnel Items --
Item 1. Engineering Technician --A new Engineering Technician
position was approved in the 1987 budget. This position was
advertised and approximately 35 applications were received. After
screening of these applications, ten applicants were invited to the
Eagan Municipal Center for a written engineering technology test.
From the results of this testing, the four top scoring applicants
were invited to the Municipal Center for an interview with Assistant
City Engineer Foertsch, Senior Engineering Tech/Supervisor Kirsch
and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that
Gordon Stauff be hired to fill the new position, subject to
successful completion of the City's physical examination
requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Gordon Stauff as an Engineering Technician, subject to successful
completion of the City's physical examination requirement.
Item 2. Engineering Intern/Technician Assistant -- After
notification of the engineering schools at local colleges and
universities, three applications to serve an internship with the
City of Eagan engineering department were received. The three
applicants were interviewed by Assistant City Engineer Foertsch and
Senior Engineering Tech/Supervisor Kirsch and it is their
recommendation that Catherine Meuwissen be hired for the temporary
six month internship. As a point of information for the members of
the City Council, Jill Pennie, who began an engineering internship
in 1986 and returned to school during the year, will return to
complete her internship beginning in June. Provision is made for
both these positions in the 1987 budget.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Catherine Meuwissen for a temporary, six month internship in the
City of Eagan engineering department.
Item 3. Municipal Center Receptionist (Two Positions) --
Approximately 65 applications were. received for these positions.
After screening of the applications, 22 candidates were invited to
the Eagan Municipal Center for a written test and a preliminary
interview with Administrative Assistant Witt and Administrative
Assistant Duffy. From the results of the written test and the
interview, eight applicants were invited to return to the Municipal
Center for a practical test operating the switchboard with
Administrative Assistant Duffy and a final interview with Director
of Finance VanOverbeke, Administrative Assistant Witt and Head
Cashier Krech. It is the consensus recommendation of all concerned
in the process that Enda Asl son and Denice Muccio Grout be hired to
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Six
PERSONNEL ITEMS CONTINUED:
fill the two positions, subject to successful completion of the
City's physical examination requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Enda
Asleson and Denice Muccio Grout as receptionists at the Municipal
Center, subject to successful completion of the City's physical
examination requirement.
Item 4. Part -Time Police Dispatcher -- The City has posted and
advertised an opening for a part time police dispatcher. During the
time allowed for applications, a current employee of the Police
Department, Marlene Adam, requested to be considered for that part-
time position. Ms. Adam is currently the Records Technician with
additional dispatch duties (full-time). It is the policy of the
City of Eagan that when a vacancy occurs in a dispatch position,
another dispatcher may request the opening with a new time (i.e.,
full to part-time, part to full-time). Therefore it is the
recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe, Office Manager Knight and
Administrative Assistant Duffy that Marlene Adam be transferred to
the part-time Police Dispatcher opening.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the transfer of
Marlene Adam to the open part-time Police Dispatcher position.
Item S. Police Records Technician -- The transfer of Marlene Adam
to part-time Police Dispatcher, if approved by Council action, will
leave vacant the Records Technician position in the Police
Department. This reorganized position was recently approved by
Council action to eliminate dispatching duties. Authorization is
needed to advertise the newly created vacancy.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the advertisement
of the vacancy for a Records Technician in the Police Department.
Item 6. Maintenance Facility Secretary -- A new secretary position
for the Maintenance Facility was approved in the 1987 budget.
Approximately 58 applications were received for this position.
After screening of the applications, twenty-two applicants were
invited to come to the Eagan Municipal Center for a written and a
typing test. From the results of these tests, ten applicants were
invited to the Municipal Center for an interview with Superintendent
of Utilities and Buildings Connolly, Superintendent of Streets and
Equipment Erhart, Superintendent of Parks and Forestry VonDeLinde
and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that
Nancy Bailey be hired to fill this newly created position, subject
to successful completion of the City's physical examination
requirement.
v
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
PERSONNEL ITEMS CONTINUED:
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Nancy
Bailey as the Maintenance Facility Secretary, subject to successful
completion of the City's physical examination requirement.
Item 7. Seasonal Park Maintenance Worker -- It is the
recommendation of Park Superintendent VonDeLinde that Dave Wills be
hired as a temporary seasonal park maintenance worker. Mr. Wills
was a seasonal park maintenance worker with the City last summer.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Dave
Wills as a temporary seasonal park maintenance worker.
Item 8. Utility Maintenance Worker -- A new Utility Maintenance
Worker position was approved in the 1987 budget. Approximately 48
applications were received for this position. After screening the
applications, twelve applicants were invited to the Eagan Municipal
Center for a written test. From these test results, six applicants
were invited back for an interview with Superintendent of Utilities
Connolly, Utilities Supervisor Heur and Administrative Assistant
Duffy. It is their recommendation that Robert Zwiener be hired to
fill the position, subject to successful completion of the City's
physical examination requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Robert Zwiener as a Utility Maintenance Worker, subject to
successful completion of the City's physical examination
requirement.
7, 1T
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Eight
PLUMBERS LICENSES
B. Plumbers Licenses --Enclosed on page is a copy of the
plumber licenses that are in order for consider tion.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of
plumbers licenses as presented.
PLUMBING LICENSES
APRIL 7, 1987
1. A.A.A. Abbott
2. A.A.A. Co-op
3. Robert B. Hill Company
4. John Hiltner Plumbing
5. Janecky Plumbing
6. Jenniges Plumbing & Heating
7. Northrup Mechical Inc.
8. Olberg Construction
9. Plymouth Plumbing, Inc.
10. Quality Rooter Plumbing
11. Regency Plumbing
12. Scherer Plumbing
13. Tom Tix Plumbing & Heating
Z7
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Nine
NEW MANAGER FOR LA FONDA'S
C. New Manager (Liquor License) LaFonda's Restaurant --The City has
received and processed an application from Randy Paul Ringsby, the
new manager of La Fonda's Restaurant. City Code specifies that a
"resident manager must take full responsibility for conduct of the
licensed premises and be a person who could qualify individually as
a licensee." Mr. Ringsby has paid the appropriate fees and
successfully passed the Eagan Police Department investigation. A
copy of his information form is attached without page number for
City Council review.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Randy Paul Ringsby as
manager of La Fonda's for purposes of issuance of a liquor license
to that restaurant establishment.
RESOLUTION REGRADING COMMERCIAL RECYCLING
D. Resolution Regarding Commercial Recycling --As a result of the
March 11, 1987 Solid Waste Abatement Commission meeting, a recom-
mendation is being forwarded to the City Council to consider a
resolution concerning commercial recycling. The purpose of the
resolution is to encourage Eagan businesses to take advantage of
private sector recyclers able to provide office paper and corrugated
cardboard recycling. The City of Eagan is currently participating
in the recycling of office paper and corrugated cardboard and by the
passage of this resolution would make local business aware of the
commercial recycling potential in hopes that they would contact a
recycling firm and participate in a commercial recycling effort.
This resolution supports the short-term strategy of the Solid Waste
Abatement Commission and City Council to comply with the recycling
mandate.
For a copy of the resolution and support information, refer to pages
through SIL.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution
allowing Eagan businesses to take advantage of private sector
recyclers able to provide office paper and corrugated cardboard
recycling as presented.
2F
CITY OF EAGAN
RESOLUTION CONCERNING
COMMERCIAL RECYCLING
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has adopted the Minnesota Waste
Management Act, Minnesota Statute 473.803, -to encourage the abatement of the
landfill disposal of certain recyclable and recoverable wastes and has
established a mandate that no unprocessed solid waste may be landfilled after
1990; and,
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has adopted policy guidelines' to
encourage the implementation of the Act, recognizing within such guidelines
the need to remove high grade office paper and corrugated materials from the
commercial wastestream; and,
. WHEREAS, the City of Eagan, through its Solid Waste Abatement
Commission, has defined office paper and corrugated material recycling as a
Positive alternative to landfill disposal; and,
WHEREAS, the cost of landfill disposal is increasing substantially
as the 1990 deadline for landfill abatement approaches and cost-effective
alternatives to such disposal are available through various vendors throughout
the metropolitan area; and,
WHEREAS, the Eagan City Council supports the role of free enter-
prise in the management of social issues and the mitigation of regional
challenges,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan encourage its
business community to undertake individual assessments of its means of solid
waste disposal and the presence of recyclable and recoverable materials in its
wastestream.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City shall make available, through
the local media and otherwise, a list of metropolitan area firms which provide
office paper and corrugated recycling services to facilitate commercial
recycling in the City of Eagan.
Motion made by:
Seconded by:
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated:
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I, E. J. VanO verbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in
a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1987.
E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
City of Eagan
Z�J
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN
DATE: MARCH 18, 1987
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION CONCERNING COMMERCIAL RECYCLING
At ,its meeting on Wednesday, March 11, 1987, the Eagan Solid
Waste Abatement Commission recommended for consideration to the
City Council the attached resolution concerning commercial
recycling. The purpose of the resolution is to encourage Eagan
businesses to take advantage of private sectorrecyclers able to
provide office paper and corrugated cardboard recycling. While
the Commission is not in a position to provide its final report,
it believes that the publication of information pertinent to
commercial recycling and the availability of a list of private
sector recyclers can be compatible with any program which it may
eventually recommend.
It is the intention of staff to publicize the availability of the
commercial recycler list through the City newsletter and by press
release to the local newspapers. It would then be the function
of staff to act merely as an information channel and not to
promote a particular vendor over any other.
In summary, the Solid Waste Abatement Commission would request
action approving or denying the resolution
concerning commercial
recycling
and thereby
directing staff to
undertake publicity
concerning
available
vendors. If you
have any questions
concerning
this matter,
please contact me.
The Commission would
appreciate
it going to
the Council at the next available meeting.
Adm'"istrative Assistant
JDH/jeh
3a
OFFICE PAPER RECYCLING FIRMS
Certain -Teed Building Products
Valley Industrial Park
Shakopee, MN 55379
(612) 445-6450
Materials accepted: High-grade office paper and corrugated
containers. Bulk loads of 1000 pounds or more preferred.
Data Fiber Products Corp
201 Girard Ave
Minneapolis, MN 55405
(612) 377-0886
Redemption center for commercial/industrial generators.
Materials accepted: High-grade office paper, corrugated
containers, IBM cards.
Haselberger Associates
392 W County Rd B
New Brighton, MN 55113
(612) 636-9452
Materials accepted: Office paper, computer paper, books
Metro Paper Recovery
965 Eustis
Minneapolis, MN 55414
(612) 332-3501
Materials accepted: All types of paper from commercial sources.
Large tonnages preferred.
Office Paper Pick -Up Inc.
860 Moore Lake Dr
Fridley, MN 55432
(612) 571-3596
Will pick up computer paper, office paper and file folders.
Pioneer Paper Stock
155 Irving Ave N
Minneapolis, MN 55405
(612) 374-2280
Materials accepted: All types of paper including colored,
corrugated, printers' waste paper, office paper. Keep individual
grades separate. 13 /
OFFICE PAPER RECYCLING FIRMS
PAGE TWO
Recycling Services
P 0 Box 409
Minneapolis, MN 55411
(612) 522-6558
Drop-off and redemption center for commercial -industrial
generators. Materials accepted: High-grade paper, computer
printouts, IBM cards, printers' waste paper. Will not accept
newspapers, magazines, phone books.
Rohn Industries
P 0 Box 464
Minneapolis, MN 55440
(612) 593-5458
(612) 333-4748
Materials accepted: High-grade office paper, computer paper,
baled cardboard. Confidential document destruction. Will not
accept loose cardboard or newspaper.
Steve's Cardboard Salvage
381 York Ave
St Paul, MN 55101
(612) 774-0984
Will pick up corrugated cardboard containers.
Waldorf Corporation
2200 Myrtle Ave
St Paul, MN 55164
(6 12) 641-4248
(612) 641-4675
Materials accepted: Corrugated, newspapers, office and computer
paper, printers' waste paper, newsprint and many other types of
paper.
37.--
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Ten
VACATE EASEMENT, RECEIVE PETITION ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
NORWEST 2ND ADDITION
E. Vacate Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Norwest
2nd Addition) --We have received a request from the property owner of
Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 2nd Addition, to vacate an existing drainage
and utility easement for the existing sanitary sewer service to the
bank facility in the northeast corner of Yankee Doodle and Pilot
Knob Roads. All application materials have been submitted as
required for proceeding with the public hearing process.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the petition to
vacate the utility easement for Norwest 2nd Addition and schedule a
public hearing to be held May 5, 1987.
33
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Eleven
APPROVE FINAL PLAT, FAIRWAY HILLS
F. Approve Final Plat, Fairway Hills --We have received a request
for final plat approval for the Fairway Hills first phase
development located on the SE corner of Pilot Knob Road and Cliff
Road as indicated by the final plat map enclosed on page All
conditions of the preliminary plat approval, granted y Council
action on May 6, 1986 have been satisfactorily resolved. All final
plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff
and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for
Fairway Hills and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all
related documents.
3�z
8
i =
x a x
1..j s
=W I 3Ell
_ 1 V
tiZ � Zy an O p
• o c. 0 S �iS• I
�'-s''-`'• \ ; � iii` ' ` � c
N
,
0
i G ��� I'} a •_:tt} / 1 .tea ,,' \ h I °I^TI i S
r ti, as SB/ � --
- ...� CTS �°C , /' ;/, d//• \'"> `< a//,° o\' �- 'p' I';
Cr
fill
c mI
•vv _ :%Li ` / ;' w/w w ,f`.. "' y �' _ i 'LI o `_��., ice`; '� ¢ :; C,
477
3 '�' =- --- a lea = = r.,......'�• � i �.
M +':• ... i - � ;'r .'r%/ .I!/% `\ � �� -alas �r �- - .1 �' es e♦r ? .�I .
c,. -I -_ -.•z- �` ,-:r.= v �.Idyvi`•
`' 4 - _j_ ,° qty:'_ :. :r'C_'•`•.$ I
♦Jy
t.ar,• M ' I I .
-av m �..
- --. � f �.°' y it;� •.I •- �+q Lie, �!I v r � I. _ ��
.) oNM y '$"(JTn� �mr�3f� a I� �, : r^,. `H'"\rC ' • r �ti ci ^ L
.F wrr-
*3a 1;'.,.V 1$ of A-
S� . .... L.�y w'.T` I �l•..'. ari—.♦. _.I c r'� 1. /1 L [ P059/
a�a
z"
.t
Nj
•k•, _ ;^ s-'�- ,la,' �'/. ter. _�L., -'I- - -�I - -- —=�^ "o I�
—. - -- JAI191 sa.. wr zE ON 14V"57
3 _LO,Yr .6I S 'iN 'H 7 5 a
•1♦
1
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twelve
PROJECT 499, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT
G. Project 499, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Chapel
Hill Baptist Church) --The staff has received a petition from the
developers of the Chapel Hill Baptist Church requesting the
preparation of a feasibility report and detail plans and
specifications for the installation of streets and storm sewer to
service that proposed development. With all costs being guaranteed,
it would be appropriate for the Council to receive this petition and
order the requested work.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for
Project 499 (Chapel Hill Baptist Church) and authorize the
preparation of the feasibility report, plans and specifications.
PROJECT 500, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT
H. Project 500, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Briar
Oaks of Apple Valley) --We have received a petition from the
develpers of the Briar Oaks of Apple Valley development just south
of the Safari resevoir. This petition requests the installation and
extension of trunk sanitary sewer facilities to service that
development. This is in compliance with the Comprehensive Sanitary
Sewer Plan and the Joint Powers Agreement recently executed between
Eagan and Apple Valley. With all costs being guaranteed by the
petitioner, it would appropriate for the Council to order the
requested report.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the petition for
Project 500 (Briar Oaks of Apple Valley) and authorize the
preparation of the feasibility report.
3�
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirteen
PROJECT 501, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT
(EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARR 8TH ADDITION)
I. Project 501, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report
(Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition) --The staff has
received a petition from the developers of the above referenced
subdivision to install a water main loop necessary to provide
service. With all costs being guaranteed in the petition, it is
recommended that the Council authorize the requested feasibility
report, plans and specifications.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for
Project 501 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition - water
main) and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report, plans
and specifications.
FINAL PLAT, LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION
J. Final Plat, Lexington Square 6th Addition --The staff has
received an application for final plat approval for the Lexington
Square 6th Addition located north of and adjacent to Northview Park
Road. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval by
Council action on March 22, 1984 have been resolved and all
requirements of the final plat application process have been
satisfactorily complied with. The copy of the proposed final plat
is provided on page -3,.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for
Lexington Square 6th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute all required documents.
37
....r�•.,w..,.V..• tea• •V.,_w
"�Yi��i' �� I nil i I +• �n
t lox,
4NNbA I Ip f i s E 3
i8 a 41; I %� sit a •i a i A =r
;�--EZ-
EllNIQ
ssrt=
•� �i I -ss Ts s �, 3j
!8'otai'8'.
J 1-as_r.or R 6Y.
ii esiti g i I • I � s
>e; I j _- s
o
r
ES
gig
r` • 7 + 1
_ =j C _:
�$�,srP�; ti i� (�� e5�io��.isre:.�s � •;Si
li�-���vx.J o E� fi�=: � :�;3�ia�s�aiss n, •.�6
ai-
�'�_stm�, � t3 fi��+?�=:s"s=�s�•4st-�:.s s; �: �
ovr!-, '-:9is:e]aE.:;a3:Y jcs3 a
,,,t��,� yb• fs N��e xey°"��=t?��i��.$��4�ir �]aa'
�•`.r?,.. �•,8 / ]y s��. _ate"t'��_-$�rt�' ih:•aw+
i�y:n5sis, _•pill iEssS
1 •Y� Y . 5 Y
ffiiE..a 'i
� ��■ � ��� aEeYEy�sxY�y�'i'.3':rci• �rsFci
4:3
if
iygaag
3
z
a
i
l
i
I
f if
F
�i
E�
�y
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
FINAL PLAT, BURR OAR HILLS ADDITION
K. Final Plat, Burr Oak Hills Addition --The staff has received an
application for final plat approval for the first phase of the Burr
Oak Hills Addition located adjace t to Inver Grove Heights and south
of T.H. 55. Enclosed on page 7is a copy of the proposed final
plat. All conditions placed n the preliminary plat approval by
Council action on April 15, 1986 have been resolved. All final plat
application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and
found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for
Burr Oak Hills Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute all required documents.
3j
X
LU
cn
747--
A.
I.
Re 'os .9 1.
cc:
1.0 t
Za'aft
fn
ai
tN
dr
N.,
ej
ro-s. -TiCco ti -
CD
4"
IL
r
O'
J.,
4p
A
-7kZ-
cu r
Amt. -i
uj
w -ft to
-0-
i It 'ZAr-V" all.'a
IQ,
�41
tcn 9 7
ro
L
.i.;Q. W.
Co
L r'to IC S
9, 47
T. -Wxm ru
'tco
0 CJ A
g. All
7,
C[ .-UW- cult..m
•1;., 1 Dos koe "fi,'3;
I crn)
.. ........ aft '— "I
ir
'00
16
.. ..........
Ncu
0
vk
M*
Cd
cc
nom.
cn
747--
A.
I.
Re 'os .9 1.
cc:
1.0 t
Za'aft
fn
ai
tN
dr
N.,
ej
ro-s. -TiCco ti -
CD
4"
IL
r
O'
J.,
4p
A
-7kZ-
cu r
Amt. -i
uj
w -ft to
-0-
i It 'ZAr-V" all.'a
IQ,
�41
tcn 9 7
ro
L
.i.;Q. W.
Co
L r'to IC S
9, 47
T. -Wxm ru
'tco
0 CJ A
g. All
7,
C[ .-UW- cult..m
•1;., 1 Dos koe "fi,'3;
I crn)
.. ........ aft '— "I
ir
'00
16
.. ..........
Ncu
0
vk
M*
H
—IriCN
LIE '6' — --�
' 325.16
N69 51'40'E
I
i
o ,�.._ ��•r,
L rw P rl 1
- r a
I � i I
;.
'+�� i,
o• 4
�r�j
337.59 IN8951'90•E!
ZI
gy; a0UTLOT Ag .\1
-W r -,,Z H-
t a
/w fi'�'Y
W�
5 R
W
Nii��r
-i
rw.'e:o�i
�T C'iNri:
��'� -.Y_rL
L J�llw J
I 1 iii+ C
Je Y r •L J L'_ _a J L _� _ L
�. 1a _ arY �i I
1J2a 6B NN9 36'12-L
iwlw llr I rw�w n Nri I r r/a r r/w
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Fifteen
RESOLUTION REQUESTING MNDOT SPEED STUDY/AUTHORIZATION
(MISCELLANEOUS STREETS)
L. Resolution Requesting MnDOT Speed Study/Authorization
(Miscellaneous Streets --With the continued expansion and growth
within the City of Eagan, several new streets are being constructed
requiring speed limit designations to be established by the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to ensure legal
enforcement of the appropriate speeds. In order to get the speed
limit established by MnDOT, it is necessary to request a formal
sp ed study to be performed by their personnel. Enclosed on pages
_ and __ is a copy of the requesting resolution and the
h
attaced lis_tinc_R streets to be included in MnDOT's study.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution
requesting MnDOT to perform a speed study for speed limit
designation on miscellaneous streets and authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute all related documents.
RESOLUTION
CITY OF EAGAN
SPEED LIMIT DESIGNATION
MnDOT SPEED STUDY REQUEST
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has recently constructed or
upgraded several streets within the community; and,
WHEREAS, the City would like to establish enforceable
speed limits along those local streets referenced on the -attached
Exhibit A;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council,
the City of Eagan, Dakota County, hereby request MnDOT District 9
to perform all required speed studies necessary to designate the
proper speed limit for those streets referenced in the attached
Exhibit A.
Motion made by:
Seconded by:
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated:
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
CERTIFICATION
Its Clerk
I, E.J. V anOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting
thereof assembled this day of , 1986.
E.J. VanOverbeke, City Cler
AL3
April 7, 1987
EXHIBIT A
TO
APRIL 7, 1987, RESOLUTION REQUESTING
MNDOT SPEED STUDY
FOR
SPEED LIMIT
MAP
SECT.
STREET
FROM
TO
22
Denmark Ave
Wescott Rd
Deerwood Dr
15
Town Center Dr
Duckwood Dr
Lexington Ave
16&17
Ashbury Rd
Blackhawk Hills
Rd Blue Cross Rd
1&2
Lone Oak Pkwy
O'Neill Dr
TH 149
1&2
Northwest Pkwy
TH 14
Lone Oak Pkwy
0
30 mph
30 mph
30 mph
35 mph
35 mph
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Sixteen
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/BLACKHAWK PLAZA
A. Conditional Use Permit to Allow Gas Pumps and Service Bays on
Separate Lots in Blackhawk Plaza --At the March 17 City Council
meeting, a conditional use permit was considered to allow gas pumps
and service bays on separate lots at the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping
Center. The APC held a public hearing on February 26 and considered
an application submitted by the owner of the Blackhawk Plaza
facility requesting a conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in
an NB district and for the separation of pumps and service bays.
The APC's recommendation is denial on the conditional use permit
application.
There were several neighbors present who raised questions regarding
the status of landscaping and other issues pertaining to the
Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center. The specific concern raised by the
abutting neighborhood was the landscaping proposed for the north
side of the shopping center that would reduce the visual impact the
shopping center creates for the neighborhood. Since the landscaping
has not occurred, the staff was directed to review the landscaping
plan and provide an update at the April 7 City Council meeting. The
Director of Public Works was asked to prepare a cross-section or
profile that illustrates the visual impact of the shopping center
once the landscaping is completed according to the landscape plan.
The Planning Department has reviewed all conditions and for a report
on he ,5onditions, please refer to a memo as attached on page(s)
_ (p -,F 7 7 A copy of the cross-section map and a location map
prepared by the Engineering Department, are enclosed on page3 419-40
for your review. f
For additional information regarding the conditional use permit
application as presented to t APC, refer to the staff report
enclosed on pages through.
Correspondence was received from Peter Stalland specifically
addressing the issue of gas pumps and service bays for Blackhawk
Plaza. Enclosed on pages _T15 through is a copy of his
letter.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
conditional use permit to allow gas pumps and service bays on
separate lots for the Blackhawk Plaza neighborhood shopping center.
Special Note: The City Attorney and City Administrator are
recommending that this item be continued until the April 21 City
Council meeting to allow evaluation of the Peter Stalland letter and
further address all the issues raised by the surrounding
neighborhood.
MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
DATE: APRIL 2, 1987
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON BLACKHAWK PLAZA
CONDITIONAL USE REPORT
At the March 17, 1987, City Council meeting, the City Council
requested the Planning Department to review the present status of
the Blackhawk Plaza Development.
The Preliminary Plat was approved June 4, 1985, subject to 18
conditions of approval placed by the Eagan City Council. It
appears that most of these 18 conditions have been fulfilled with
the granting of the final plat for the first phase. The only
conditions which have not been complied with at this time are the
following:
3. No building permit shall be allowed for Lot 8 until the
Planning Commission/City Council have reviewed and approved
the layout with the understanding there will be no variances
for building permits on that lot. It appears the ponding
area has been changed and approved in regard to the final
plat and that this condition would no longer be applicable.
7. A detailed landscape plan has been submitted and reviewed by
City staff. Attached is a portion of the landscape plan
pertaining to the area to the west and north showing the
detail of plant materials being proposed. This does exceed
the requirements the City has in regard to the landscaping
policy.
9. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be concealed by a parapet
wall or suitable screening. At this time, staff does not
know if this has been complied with but is pointing out that
additional screening for the rooftop should be considered in
the building design.
It is Planning Department's understanding that Engineering is
preparing cross sections and will be able to discuss the grade
and elevation issues of the building as it relates to Blackhawk
Road and property to the north.
City Planner
DCR/jj
Attachment
NY To Fsie nLrITEP
A -T I3ax OF "IMINCI
AREA To 1$E t;;FFP <D
w/ #10 HKII-WAY mD M
I P_ LANTING SCHEDULE
CODE
QTY.
COMMON NAME/LATIN NAME SIZE
ROOT
REMARKS
A
��
C LT17 o�ulp�nTAl.17 CAL
IERT
LBAP-
B .
i�
Furls?IRE WriPEM z' z"
11LIA roFwTA'GRE SPIRE' CAL.
LI:APEiL
C
—pca CaI�uCA PE1'1,�TA '_ HToizM
-.
-..4.�.
YIGEA GU►uCA DENSATII — - T
Gcx CAGO SLvE gPIz�CE _._.r ...
�.
_ .
FOW
F
_
G
�p2
1-' 70 �._n•G.
--
H
-
52
ELh1Y_�bK1fp_�LJcroD 9' t
Gomer, _LatytEERK I'LL KEL` F -Y_ NT_-_
Alc lt'i'f i4V:
Fob'.
�z----._-.
-
DELP59-M
c-
K
L
�b
PAARF_Pt"It�F 3' .
vI PowA F -F_ I Iu oPorEAK CRAM> M€ Y _�T_:.
NT
T
-
►Z
1 N 12 ��vvvI_S V zps9'^ ` W� ;�•• ,SO2dy-�,
6% Tn�l n ' .,, ` 4 or 95 71 103 71 so
ON- V :ool
8489 BB 99 8899
.125.09 � n, � 8°j � /z9 03 � / 'royrn. aaw re �
�= 489it135 m 42 rvf r Ir`aa n.�a . esSs e�_c _•zs c-.._ <
- LANE R
6 e
h,. �•ae..r ,La„ x o. _
�� do• °.° II a;e E - 36 29gj2q
g. e E � � a.m o y� � .9•
22 - - ya3V a 2• -_!40 69 - -
m i120 0 ry S91°Sy';6 E
14162 Q. I NB99e SOW a so
`o 37 CARNELIAN -°
to pp p -
23 a. _ � 3 p W _ 1400
Q, Z N87'472( -W °
:Q
--- .. - _ - --- 132_ i_ _ -
1487°4i2:"W- 36
p
24 - 0 9 oa� 4 -- City of
l
128.76 - Eagan 010-77
- ;4
NB7°4, 2i W,
S m _
a 23 a m p CN m 6�
° 125 0
N>O
N i5jc ,Z 120 12490 _ i 34
iV N S.W N83305OW I - rry
140 0 p
p 26 ^ S w_p :
33• w_ 7 0 6 ,0 1 so R -
m 128 3° - 33 6e PAR K
44S j3 "07 59 r 3 / '� '.Psr' Sun •, ° r _
r
'. • �. efaa �dw i.o oo•'c>3`aa'y
27 /mss HALITE ' dti 5w� `•
j Gq p 020-77
.,b - : `a 9g9g 07701 92 3 65� •a �as .s '^:,�,
ti W 3 JJ 32
P� 26 '•S/rj
�. nr 29 p'•- 30 0^ 31 4 5 `- �Jo PO sw'• OUTLOT Ate✓
0.O
96 2r
3 I \' • Y 5 \�
1700 Inn 35 r 158 0 76 G N'h EST EAST b S 89°38.56 . OJO-78 0
8863 \ IIS - 90. 90 9C 9C 95 = •' JJ' 040. + J
aB' 44--^/•� W __ X030 ! !
� 2 $_ I 'y} _��s,�-- 4', 335
7 \ z. z a .� 10*P`-- BiE30w 6
90 9C �9C SB 723Y gg dr ; SOEv0 1
.vd'a . 4 R a v 2�•.
a
`^ °�•Z -1'% N B9°40'224. 46
r+ iJ2'!�' o^^ �E�— r 226. ' �';'/ M•.
a WI KATFIRYN \ IRCLEO-'1 010-78 ; ; �•
BIO\i 109 53
s5
N
N.B9°4409r _60- 60 _ � �i,°/12 n ~ A/O n rte- 14 •:
r 120 73 N 89°40,2 !I' „
3 'm __ q a. o = O
z P 3-.18C1b0o0 a i'/'L` S 78°1y O:"1
9 P, R-60 y 8 17 z 81 70.91 1r2 ° E o-�
y,_.. +BBS '
020
l o 0-78
plQ ♦ d o
EF ,
' ISO zl BO z 182 21 °a•2' ��,'^. \� I
• - - - - N 89°40 22"W 473 68
I
( wE^°
N 89`.0
030-79 - so
c1r,
I .. jT- ..1'+.... 11'1.1.: •1(.`. `: .r.': 1)1
�� GL
_ __EAST 3375- --.-_- --1__ ��•._��•-.' _.-_ 'ria '
= 040lit-
-79 �// ' B `L ------ p----} -� ti._ �• — ;`,�- "
-� -
wE ST :a `i ,• 4•a.
050 -79 -
ms o �•�;•....��- °
n ,
4 4 6.041 22- W/--..1Btvs _ -. `- N p `1 22- • '
1� 070 79to pa c+ • c _ ; �•1 4
060 —79
EArAN TOWN CEYETERT
p f
_
I
010-80 Z ovm& 'e `.
9 2640 26
Ei
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: BLACKHAWR PLAZA INC., STEVE RAMSEY
LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 20
EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 26, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT '
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the owner
of the Blackhawk Plaza facility, requesting a conditional use permit
to allow gas pumps in a N.B. (neighborhood business) district and
for the separation of pumps and service bays. Tom Thumb will be the
tenant located on the westernmost portion of Blackhawk Plaza along
Blackhawk Road.
This application does not include service bays, however, Lot 5 of
this plat did receive a conditional use permit approval for a full
service gas station as per Code r.e,quir.ements at the time of
preliminary plat approval. Code does not allow the opening of such
a facility until at least 10,000 square feet of retail space has had
occupancy. In addition, the owner intends to provide auto related
service facilities on Lot 7 near the cemetary along County Road 30.
The City's Engineering Department has reviewed this plan and all
auto turning radius' meet requirements. All-setbacks.meet Code
requirements and only 3 parking stalls will be removed.
If approved, this conditional use permit shall be subject to the
following conditions:
1. The canopy will not be used for additional signage.
2. The storage tanks shall be located entirely under the drive
area so if they are replaced or repaired, the landscaping along
Blackhawk Road will not be disturbed.
3. The canopy shall be no closer than 50 feet to the Blackhawk
Road right-of-way.
4. All other applicable Code requirements shall be adhered to.
r�-
• L7riILLN
RRA
TOM THUMB
9]50 Sp FT. I
tZIPROP05En GIL&MLO M717-1
I
• I
PROPOSED CONSOLE FpFI R6h`
MINI AGEMENT'"OF SELF- SEI
DISPENSERS WI INTERLOM TE
1 bLAN D
_0 PROPOSCD CfaNOPY tU�
EN611'v FFR w/ No .mer••
f31 P0.OPDSE.� Z" C ALV 0.1.11,
t2� PllDYO SED 4L0 � 11�-0
KEINFDRLEO CDNC MS r
'// )
% �. PROPQOEC ZH'-0 • 52.'-O CIPANOPV W i
t'31 PROPOSED 2' GALVAUIZED YENT'�
UNES TO \2' R1]ERS OU CANOPY
COLUMN
/—'SN?RfU?0SE0 3/4 FIP 5U$PUiJIPS �-
f PRDFOSED OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS TANKS-�
I■f 12112.000 GALLON . R'.O • 'Ste, -0 • \�
U1 10.000 C+ALLON. 5'-0 * 30'-O ANO CONTAIN: �\
11 G
REGULAR
REGULAR
UNLENV
O SUPER- UNLENO -
C11 PROPOSED A, rILL rIrE% Vv/ DROP TUBFti 1
.� Y14DYUSE0 ZW-O •3D'•L+ •td' REINFOKLEL7 CONf_IIL--TE SLFPM'
OVER TGNIK'S
NOTE! uNvEr GROUND TANKS HAVE 2.'•C SEf ARNTION AND 3'-O
DURY DEPTLI
7-
_0 PROPOSCD CfaNOPY tU�
EN611'v FFR w/ No .mer••
f31 P0.OPDSE.� Z" C ALV 0.1.11,
t2� PllDYO SED 4L0 � 11�-0
KEINFDRLEO CDNC MS r
'// )
% �. PROPQOEC ZH'-0 • 52.'-O CIPANOPV W i
t'31 PROPOSED 2' GALVAUIZED YENT'�
UNES TO \2' R1]ERS OU CANOPY
COLUMN
/—'SN?RfU?0SE0 3/4 FIP 5U$PUiJIPS �-
f PRDFOSED OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS TANKS-�
I■f 12112.000 GALLON . R'.O • 'Ste, -0 • \�
U1 10.000 C+ALLON. 5'-0 * 30'-O ANO CONTAIN: �\
11 G
REGULAR
REGULAR
UNLENV
O SUPER- UNLENO -
C11 PROPOSED A, rILL rIrE% Vv/ DROP TUBFti 1
.� Y14DYUSE0 ZW-O •3D'•L+ •td' REINFOKLEL7 CONf_IIL--TE SLFPM'
OVER TGNIK'S
NOTE! uNvEr GROUND TANKS HAVE 2.'•C SEf ARNTION AND 3'-O
DURY DEPTLI
Ci
i tip
L 1
UJ
Xv %.I
a a
Ci
APC Minutes
February 26, 1987
Kennebec and Seneca Roads intersection on Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Industrial
Park in the southwest quarter of Section 17. Mr. Runkle indicated that.the
proposed sign met all ordinance requirements. There was no one from the
public, however, the owner was present to respond to questions. Staff
indicated that there were no other tenants in the building. Mr. Voracek was
advised that future signs could meet the 300 foot spacing requirement on
adjacent lots. Krisnik moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit for a 20 foot tall pylon sign with a signage
area of approximately 104 square feet, subject to all applicable sign
ordinances and a one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. All voted in
favor.
BLACKHAWK PLAZA - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The application of Blackhawk Plaza, Inc., Steve Ramsey, for a conditional
use permit to allow gas pumps in a NB (Neighborhood Business) district, and
for the separation of gas pumps and service bays in Blackhawk Plaza in the
southeast quarter of Section 20, was the subject of the third public hearing
convened by Mr. Harrison. City Planner Runkle introduced the proposal which
was a request from Tom Thumb, a major anchor tenant on the western most
portion of Blackhawk Plaza Center, to have gas pumps with a canopy, while the
service bays would be located in a separate facility on a separate lot, with a
separate owner near the cemetery along County Road #30. Mr. Chuck Carmichael,
attorney for the applicant, was present. There was no one from the public.
Mr. Krisnik questioned the validity of the proposed buffer to residents to
the west in the single family homes and the location of the gas pumps and
canopies so close to Blackhawk Road. Mr.. Voracek requested information
regarding the location of R-1 residents relative to the proposed gas pumps and
information as to any potential fire code violations. Mr. Runkle indicated
that State Fire Marshall and City Fire Chief approval would be required.
The applicant was reminded that under City Ordinance, service bays would
have to be operational in order for gas pumps to be allowed. Mr. Carmichael
pointed out that the shopping center itself was due to open very soon and that
the car service center which would have the bays, is not yet being
constructed. There was discussion regarding the berm between the Center and
Blackhawk Road, which apparently could not exceed 3 feet in height, if even
that high. It was indicated that the Tom Thumb lease was contingent upon
obtaining gas pumps. Mr. Krisnik indicated concern in regard to the shielding
of lighting from the gas pump canopy.
Trygg moved to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and
Chairman Hall seconded the motion in order to put the matter on the floor
before the Commission. Trygg and Harrison voted yea; Gustafson and Krisnik
voted nay; and Voracek abstained based on his belief that Tom Thumb was a
client of his employer. Krisnik then moved to recommend denial of the
conditional use permit, based upon:
�r-
APC Minutes
February 26, 1987
1. The fact that the pumps would be provided without a direct tie to
service bays as required under the ordinance.
2. That the service bays would be located too close to the cemetery area.
3. That the gas pumps and lighting were too close to the residential
areas.
Harrison seconded the motion to put the matter on the floor. Gustafson,
Krisnik and Harrison voted yea; Trygg voted nay; and Voracek abstained. The
motion passed.
JAMES UNKER - WAIVER OF PLAT
Chairman Harrison then called the public hearing in regard to the request
for waiver of plat by James Unker for lot 10, Block 3, Cle arview Addition, in
the southeast quarter of Section 29. Mr. Runkle introduced the application.
Mr. Unker was present and requested that the matter be tabled to allow him to
review the conditions proposed by City staff in regard to the request of lot
split. There was significant discussion in regard to the large number of
easements required to service the property. There was no one from the public
to respond. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to continue the matter
to the regular March APC meeting. All voted yes.
DANBURY ADDITION - REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT & VARIANCE
At 7:50 p.m., Mr. Harrison called the public hearing in regard to the
application of Tri -Land Properties for rezoning from Agricultural to R-1
single family, and preliminary plat for Danbury Addition with a variance from
R-1 requirements in the northwest quarter of Section 23, surrounded by the
Lexington Square Additions. It was noted that the preceding applicant on the
agenda was not yet ready, and requested to be placed later on the agenda.
City Planner Runkle presented the application for the 17 lots completely
surrounded by previously platted additions of Lexington Square. He indicated
that a Comprehensive Guide Amendment was not required, however, a variance
would be needed from R-1 requirements. The Lexington Square parcels
surrounding the proposed plat did consist of lots of similar dimensions. Mr.
Brad Swenson was present on behalf of the applicant consisting of an out-of-
state partnership. Mr. Bill Kennedy of Lot 4, Block 7, Lexington Square was
present and expressed concern regarding the value of the homes to be
constructed in comparison to the homes presently built in that area. Mr.
Swenson advised that the same builders, College City Builders, would be
building the homes of a very similar nature to the ones in Mr. Kennedy's
addition. The public hearing was closed.
Discussion centered around the size of the lots in comparison to the
surrounding lots. Voracek moved to recommend approval of the rezoning with a
variance for the proposed lot dimensions to coincide with the residential lots
;. surrounding the proposed plat, Krisnik seconded the motion and all voted in
.'' favor.
LAW OFFICES
,STALLAND 8c STALLAND
ONE CORPORATE CENTER FINANCIAL PLAZA
7261 OHMS LANE
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 86436
LUTHER M. STALLAND
K. PETER STALLAND
April 1, 1987
Mayor Bea Blomquist and
Members of the Eagan City Council
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Blackhawk Plaza Conditional Use Permits to Allow
Gas Pumps and Service Bays on Separate Lots
Dear Madam Mayor and Members of the City Council:
TELEPHONE
(619) 835-8577
Please be advised that our office represents Mr. Steve Ramsey,
dba Haven Enterprises, Inc. who is the developer and owner of
Blackhawk Plaza at the corner of Blackhawk Road and Diffley
Road in Eagan. As you know Mr. Ramsey has applied for condi-
tional use permits to allow separation of gas pumps and ser-
vice bays within the project. Although at time of preliminary
and final plat, we received approval for a gas station with
pumps on Lot 5 (which borders on Diffley Road), tenant demand
has changed and Mr. Ramsey needs to place gas pumps next to the
Blackhawk Road side of the shopping center for Tom Thumb's gro-
cery store. The service bays will be incorporated into an auto
service center which will be located on Lot 7 almost directly
across from the Tom Thumb store.
It is our opinion that Mr. Ramsey has a legal right to get the
conditional use permits applied for pursuant to Eagan Ordinance
Chapter 11.20, Subdivision 10(C). This Ordinance outlines cer-
tain requirements which an applicant must meet for a condi-
tional use permit within a neighborhood business district which
is what the subject property is currently zoned. Where a
zoning ordinance specifies standards for the approval of a
special use permit which an applicant fully complies with, a
denial of the permit is arbitrary as a matter of law. Metro
500, Inc. vs. City of Brooklyn Park (1973) 211 NW 2d 358. The
City of Eagan's Ordinance states that automobile service sta-
tions may be permitted if the applicant complies with five
requirements. Mr. Ramsey will do his best to adhere to those
requirements despite the fact that the Ordinance does not
55
Mayor Bea Blomquist and
Members of the City Eagan Council
April 1, 1987
Page Two
address a situation where a permit application requests a
separation of pumps and service bays. It should be noted by
the City Council that when a city's ordinance is ambiguous
relative to an application which affects a property owner's
rights, the Supreme Court of Minnesota has made it clear that a
city ordinance will be strictly construed against the city and
in favor of the property owner. Amcon vs. City of Eagan (1984)
348 NW 2d 66.
The City Council has already set a precedent in granting condi-
tional use applications for separation of gas pumps and service
bays. Examples are the Nichols and Cliff Road corner with the
Holiday gas and service bays; Diffley and Lexington for the
Kunz Oil pumps and bays; and more recently the B. B. D. Brooks
Superette pumps and service bays at the corner of Yankee Doodle
and Coachman Road where that project was also a neighborhood
business district. Municipalities are constitutionally
required to treat similarly situated people alike in applying
standards contained in local zoning ordinances. Odell vs. Cit,,,_
of Eagan (1984) 348 NW 2d 792. Since the City has allowed
other landowners to separate the pumps and the service within a
commercial business district, it would only appear reasonable
and fair for them to allow our client to do the same.
As you know from your packet from the Planning staff, the
Advisory Planning Commission on February 26, 1987 denied the
permit application of our client. Three reasons were given for
the denial as the Minutes reflect. The first reason was that
"the pumps would be provided without a direct tie to service
bays as required under the Ordinance." There is no such
requirement under the Ordinance. The Ordinance itself does not
refer in any manner whatsoever to a situation where pumps and
service are separated. As stated before, the law in this state
is that where an ordinance is ambiguous and vague the City
should construe it in favor of the landowner.
The second reason given was that "the service bays would be
located too close to the cemetery area." It is hard to respond
to this reason for denial since there appears to be no reason
why a service bay would adversely affect this cemetery area by
being too close. The third reason for denial states that "the
gas pumps and lighting were too close to the residential
areas." In a very recent case before the Court of Appeals of
Minnesota a landowner was denied a conditional use permit to
operate a 24 hour combination gas station and grocery store
Mayor Bea Blomquist and
Members of the Eagan City Council
April 1, 1987
Page Three
across the street from a residential neighborhood in the City
of Minneapolis. The Court held that there was no adverse
affects upon the residential neighborhood and that neighborhood
opposition was not a legally sufficient reason for denying the
permit. Amoco Oil Company vs. City of Minnea:,,olis (1986) 395
NW 2d 115.
At the last City Council meeting the City Council allowed cer-
tain neighbors to voice their objections about the project.
These neighbors have objected to the project from the very
beginning and have continuously attempted to thwart the develop-
ment of the project at every turn. Not only are the neighbors'
objections relative to the height of the shopping center and
the lack of landscaping (which obviously cannot be installed
until construction has been completed) irrelevant to the City
Council determination on this conditional use permit, but also
their objections relative to the specific conditional use per-
mits are not legally sufficient for a City Council denial of
same. Amoco Oil Company vs. City of Minnea2olis. It has long
been the law of this state that a municipality may not condi-
tion restricted uses of property upon the consent of private
individuals such as owners of adjoining property. State ex rel
Foster vs. City of Minneapolis (1959) 97 NW 2d 273; Metro 500,
Inc. vs. City of Brooklyn Park (1973) 211 NW 2d 35.8; C. R.
Investments, Inc. vs. Village of Shoreview (1981) 304 NW 2d-
320; Chanhassen Estates Residents Association vs. Cite of Chan-
hassen (1984) 342 NW 2d 335.
The owners and developers of the Blackhawk Plaza property have
met with the adjoining neighbors on numerous occasions and have
attempted to develop a project which will be an asset to both
the City of Eagan and to the adjoining community. The subject
property was zoned for general commercial business use many
years before any of the surrounding residential properties were
ever developed. That zoning has been public record and those
neighbors had every opportunity to educate themselves to the
surrounding uses of their property before they built their
homes. Therefore, the neighbors have no legitimate basis to
complain about gas pumps and service bays which are normal com-
mercial uses.
Our client has every intention of developing a beautiful neigh-
borhood business center. He will comply with those conditions
which the Planning Department has suggested in their staff
5',
r
Mayor Bea Blomquist and
Members of the Eagan City Council
April 1, 1987
Page Four
report. We ask only that Mr. Ramsey be given the same type of
fair treatment which other landowners have received from the
City Council relative to their applications for gas pumps and
service bays within a business district.
Thank you for your consideration.
Yours very truly,
Peter Stalland
PS/7J
cc: Paul. Hauge, Esq.
i --T- mas Hedges, City Administrator
Dale Runkle, City Planner
Thomas Colbert, City Engineer
Steve Ramsey
Charles Carmichael, Esq.
George L. May, Esq.
Darrel Deming
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Seventeen
REFUNDING/SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS & WATER REVENUE BONDS
A. Special Assessments
and Water Revenue Bonds Refunding --The
Director of Finance and City Administrator have been working with
representatives of Miller
& Schroeder Financial, Inc., to review and
discuss the feasibility
of refunding several general obligation
improvement bonds and a
water revenue bond issue for the City.
Nearly all outstanding bond issues have been reviewed and it has
been the conclusion of
the City staff and Miller & Schroeder
Financial, Inc., that two
(2) bond issues that have previously been
refunded should again
be refunded in what is described as a
crossover refunding bond
issue and, six other bond issues should be
grouped together into one (1) advanced refunding bond issue. The
City Council could also refund
the water revenue bonds of 1983.
The Director of Finance and City Administrator are recommending that
the two (2) bonds that were previously refunded be included in a
crossover refunding bond issue and several other general improvement
bond issues be grouped into one umbrella and sold as an advanced
refunding bond issue. In the case of the umbrella bond issue, the
debt will be shortened to four (4) years and there will be assurance
to the City that all of the general obligation improvement bond
issues will not have a negative cash flow at the end of the four
years. Anytime debt is shortened by either a call or a refunding,
the City improves its future status for a higher bond rating. Also,
due to the high rate of pre -payments and the restriction on
reinvestments due to the low rate of interest, one or two funds
could incur a negative balance which would either require a transfer
from another bond fund or general tax levy prior to defeasing the
bond issue. The advanced refunding will provide certain assurances
to the City that these bond funds will have a positive cash flow at
the time debt is retired. Most of the bond issues that are out-
standing have interest rates at approximately 9% and would be
refunded at a rate of approximately 5% which generates a consider-
able savings to the City.
The City Administrator requested a memo from Miller and Schroeder
that outlines the bond issues that are being proposed for refunding,
explains and defines a crossover refunding bond issue and gives
reasons why the City should consider refunding certain bond issues
at this time. This memo is no longer appropriate due to the
continuance.
�9
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Eighteen
The Chairman of the Finance Committee, City Councilmember Jim Smith,
has been apprised of the proposed refunding and if members of the
Finance Committee, either City Councilmember Egan or City
Councilmember Smith, have any concerns upon reviewing this informa-
tion and would like a Finance Committee meeting prior to the City
Council meeting on Tuesday, arrangements will be made on either
Monday or Tuesday to hold the meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS
ITEM: To 1)
establish
a bond sale
date for May 6, 1987, at 12:00
noon, 2) authorize a
bond rating
from Standard and Poor's and Moody's, and 3)
authorize
a member of
the City Council, Director of
Finance and
City Administrator to
secure a bond rating in New York
if a meeting
is deemed
necessary.
Special Note: This item is to be continued indefinitely allowing
staff and the fiscal consultants additional review.
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Nineteen
VARIANCE FOR CANOPY SETBACK SUPER AMERICA FACILITY
B. Variance to Allow a 17' Canopy Setback Variance Along Pilot Knob
Road for the SuperAmerica Facility --An application was submitted by
the SuperAmerica Company requesting a 17' canopy setback variance
along Pilot Knob Road. The normal setback requirement is 50' and
the canopy is proposed at a location that would require a 17'
variance or would be placed 33' from the right-of-way.
For additional information and the reason SuperAmerica Inc. is
proposing the new canopy, refer to the Planning Department report, a
copy is enclosed on pages _(.Z, through 6,S .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
variance as submitted by SuperAmerica Inc.
variance along Pilot Knob Road.
(V
To approve or deny the
for a 17' canopy setback
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: SUPERAMERICA INC
LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SUPERAMERICA ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 7, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: :MARCH 27, 1987
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM, PLANNING DEPT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the
Superamerica Company requesting a 17' canopy setback variance
along Pilot Knob Road. This canopy, considered a building struc-
ture, has a 50' setback requirement - 33' is proposed. The
canopy will cover a proposed fourth gas pump island with 5 pumps.
The parking/drive lane setback will not be affected by this
request.
With this proposal, Superamerica will substantially increase
the .perimeter landscaping. The original/approved plan in 1984
did not have berming or any coniferous plant material for year-round
interest and screening. This revised plan with undulating berming
between the existing ash trees will add: 100 Maney Junipers, a
bluish shrub with a vertical form; 39 Isanti Dogwoods grouped
around the trunks of the ash trees; and 128 'Gold Flame' Spirea.
This plant has bright green leaves and hot pink flowers in the
spring.
The revised landscape plan will greatly enhance the image of
that intersection as well as provide screening of the cars around
the pump area.
This plan meets all of the performance standards within the
City's landscape policy.
If approved, this Variance shall be subject to:
1) A striped 'No Parking' area as shown to allow an uninterrupted
drive aisle.
JS/j j
�§ � � � ƒ
14!|... .
K ROM
i � /\ \��
��i
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty
VARIANCE SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR HEDLUND AND JOHNSON
C. Variance to Allow Change in Side Yard Setback Requirement for
Kal vin Hedlund and Steven Johnson on Lot 6, Block 3, Rahn Ridge
Addition --A variance application was submitted to the City by Kal vin
Hedlund and Steven Johnson requesting a 2' variance in Parcel B and
a 5' variance in Parcel A for a duplex family home located on Lot 6,
Block 3, Rahn Ridge Addition.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages j through e'(,_.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
variance request for a 5' variance in Parcel A and a 2' variance in
Parcel B as requested by Kalvin Hedlund and Steven Johnson.
6�
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: KALVIN HEDLUND AND STEVEN JOHNSON
LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 3, RAHN RIDGE
EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 7, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 24, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a 2'
variance on Parcel Banda 5' variance on Parcel A for duplex family
homes located on Lot 6, Block 3, Rahn Ridge Addition.
PLANNER COMMENTS: The applicant property is bounded by Vienna Lane
on the east and south, Kings Road on the west and Pin Oak Drive on
the north. The appl.icant's property is principally bounded by
duplex structures.
Initial construction plans for this property called for a deck on
both Parcels A and B which requires a 5' setback in both cases.
During the construction of the duplex, however, the owners chose to
convert the decks into three season porches which instead of the 5'
setback, requires a 10' setback. As a consequence, Parcel B
requires a variance of 2' and Parcel A requires a variance of 5'.
Examination of Building Inspection records indicate the contractor
was informed construction of three -season porches instead of decks
would violate City Ordinances concerning building setbacks. To
date, however, construction of the porches has essentially been
completed and the Building Inspections Department is withholding the
structure occupancy permit until the setback issue is resolved.
If the variance application is approved, all other City ordinances
shall apply to this property.
(�5
Hedlund Engineering Services 9201 East WoominatonFrog"
61001011Vton,Mhrreota 66420
Lod Surveyors Civil Engineers Land Planners Phone: 688-02as
r Sur gO,r-(S e&i1iWtC AIWA
BOOK _ PAGE
JOB NO. 86' 329
IlWft Y FOR: Calvin Hedlund / Steve Johnson
DLV.RWD AS: PARCEL A:
That Part of Lot 6, Block 3, RAHN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County,
Minnesota, lying northeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said
Lot 6 distant 21.09 feet east of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the south
line of said Lot 6 distant 112.08 feet east of the southwest corner thereof, as measured
along said line, and reserving easements of record.
PARCEL B:
That part of Lot 6, Block 3, RAHN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County,
Minnesota, lying southwesterly of a line drawn from a Point on the north line of said
Lot 6 distant 21.09 feet east of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the south
line of said Lot 6 distant 112.08 feet east of the southwest corner thereof, as measured
along said line, and reserving easements of record.
CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION OF SUILO1NG
1 hereby certify that an 9-8- i�oRCH oG�+o +u V•+•�•
I made a survey of the location of the
building on the above doscribed property(
and that 1110 location of said building Is U V
corrocily shown an the above at.
�, ,.+
W
Z
934,0
936.9
{
° L 344_2
9..62
�
.�
EH57 947j
^'
PROPOS
�,,�� 00Oro
d�0� 'R
IOP OF FO ATION = 941.0
GARAGE OOR =940.5
• 5�
v I E N IV A
FAS�btENT FLOOR
:;—F ER SERVICE ELEV. _
9_44.6 9'42,g
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS : Q
EXISTING ELEVATIONS
DRAINAGE DIRECTIONS : —►—
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
-
DENOTES LOT CORNERS : 0
I hereby certify that on
7 /29 /86 I surveyed the propW
!�!�_ i0Q'1 1"VTdWtho1
the above plot is a correct representation of sold survey.((-'
J
Jaffr y
indgren, LiceWse No. 14376
MY
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -One
VARIANCE/FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT/EDWARD GALLAGHER
D. Variance to Allow Change in Front Yard Setback Requirement for
Edward L. Gallagher, Lot 16, Block 5, Cedar Grove 2nd Addition --An
application for a variance request has been submitted by Edward L.
Gallagher requesting a 9' front setback variance for a front entry
and attached garage for a single family home located on Lot 16,
Block 5, Cedar Grove 2nd Addition.
For additional information on the variance request, refer to the
Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages
through.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a 9' front
yard setback variance for front entry and attached garage for Edward
L. Gallagher as presented.
Note: The City requires that all persons within 200' of any
property owner requesting a variance be sent a notice of the
proposed variance and a date when the variance will be considered by
the City Council. This applies to all the variances that are under
consideration by the City Council as a part of New Business.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: EDWARD L. GALLAGHER
LOCATION: LOT 16, BLOCK 5, CEDAR GROVE ADDITION #2
EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY
DATE OF -PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 7, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 24, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a 9'
front setback variance for a front entry and attached garage for a
single family home located on Lot 16, Block 5, Cedar Grove 2nd
Addition.
PLANNER COMMENTS: The applicant's property is bounded by Jasper
Drive on the east, Sandstone Drive on the south, Amber Drive on the
west and Coral Lane on the north. Adjacent lots are typically
75' x 120' with an approximate total square footage of 9,000 square
feet. Specifically, the applicant's property is 75' x 120' for a
total of 9,000 square feet.
The applicant argues that a 9' front setback variance is essential
to construct a front entry and attached garage on the east side of
the existing one story house because sufficient space is not
existent for an attached standard two car garage; and an unattached
garage is not feasibile since a side variance would be required and
result in -the removal of a mature large willow tree.
If this variance application is approved, the applicant shall adhere
to all other City ordinances.
I I
Ur11Nj say nue PLAT DRAWING
insurance comoanU (THIS IS NOT A SURVEY)
f J,
ORDER NO.: 1 V- / 2 3 0 �- INSP. DATE:
STREET ADDRESS: l_f
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ZC2�
INS . BY: _6 -7—c--
w
7immisimi
■■■■
■■ll
■E■ ■ ���>.I■II�■■wi�www■■■r ■�■� r■■ MEMO `►. 1►■■■■
■EM■■■Eat■■�`�■��■ NOON■■.■■.■
■■■■
■..E■■■■■■■ ■■ 0■■■ ■"
■. ■■
NONE ■M.■■■ ■■■■OMI..INNOON..■.■■I■■. ■�.E■ 1�■NNE■ ■E■..■■
■■ ■■.■
■■■ ■. ■■■■■ 1■■■■�.■■■■
■■■O M �■ ■■■ E■■M.ME ■ .� .■■■ IM►.
■.■■■E►�.O.M.�■E• ■iINN ■.■■■
NONE ■GI■■■■■■■■�■ ►I i� ■■ ■■■E■
Gi11■■�■ EENT ■■■E■
■■,,, ,R 'ME ■■■ ■■■■■■
■■1■■■■�I■ EE■J■■■ ■
/i■■ ■■■� NOON
NOON■ N1■ ■■RRI NWIMM I■ M■■■ i■■■�■■■■.■■
MEMO
■■■■■■■■■■.■ ■■■■.■.■■■■■■■■■
IMMEMEMMIMEMMIMMEMENNEEMEN No
NOON ■■�E■■■■tet■r�.■■■.■■■r■■■ ■■E■■.
NONE ■.■■■.■■■.■■..■■■.■■.■■CSEEMS
ON
....[�■E.■.■..M.IMEMISIMEM `■■■EE■E■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■E■■■E ■■■■■ SEMI
im■ ■■■■■■■M■ME■S
IMMESIM EM■■MSICon EMso MONISM F. MEN
EEM 0 SOMEONE=■■EEM■IM■■.■E■■■C ■■M■■ ■■.NNE■ MENEON■■
WMEME E®■GENG= :.ii :rte � ■ � :..1 I
■■■■■■■E■■■■■■■■■■M■E5■�■■- ■■MIME
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■G�:`Ni■E.E■ ■■■N
■ MEMO=
■.EME■E.■E■ ■■E ■ ME M■■ ■ ..■■■
■.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■■.■■■■. ■INI■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■ ■■■■:
. ructiv 911 11 e
inspection,w�sescribecl in the insured Mortgage, as on a visual and taped
land shown those Countv records which under the .:
autl Fjrad0Jd ISOM
70
Jasper Dr.
I z 3 4 S u S e 1a It, Il IS 11 2021 .D4 Z':.
" 3 Ft.
75' X 120' = 9,000' t 9 = 1,000' t 5 = 200'
Existing Structure 44' X 22' = 968'
Proposed Garage 20' X 39' = 780'
Proposed Entry 5' X 9' - 45'
1,795' t 9 = 199.3'
See Attached Letter for Notes A (Back Step & Door)
B (Large Healthy Willow Tree)
71
,1
B L rge Healthy
Will,u Tree
I
i
m
r
T,
u
;
peck' i''utuTe
N
+
IIj
d
w
Proposed Attached
Garage (20' X 39')
780'
w
ff A
Existing Structure (One Story House)
(44' X 221) 968'
Pi� posed Fron Entry (5' X 9') 45'
APRON 1
1
�
l
'
DRIVEWAY
1
J*
1
1
f
1
EXHIBIT A.
Jasper Dr.
I z 3 4 S u S e 1a It, Il IS 11 2021 .D4 Z':.
" 3 Ft.
75' X 120' = 9,000' t 9 = 1,000' t 5 = 200'
Existing Structure 44' X 22' = 968'
Proposed Garage 20' X 39' = 780'
Proposed Entry 5' X 9' - 45'
1,795' t 9 = 199.3'
See Attached Letter for Notes A (Back Step & Door)
B (Large Healthy Willow Tree)
71
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty-two
VARIANCE%FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR MICHAEL MARXER
E. Variance to Allow Change in Front Yard Setback Requirements for
Michael Marxer, Lot 1, Block 1, Greensboro 1st Addition --An
application for a variance was submitted by Mr. Michael Marxer,
requesting a 4.35' building setback along Wescott Road in the
Greensboro 1st Addition. This property is zoned R-1 single family
and described as Lot 1, Block 1, Greensboro 1st Addition. This lot
has front yard setbacks on two streets: 50' along Wescott and 30'
along Greensboro Drive where the driveway is proposed. The building
cannot be moved to the north anymore and meet and side yard setback
of 10'. If approved the variance shall be subject to all applicable
ordinances.
For a copy of a site location for the Michael and Coleen Marxer
property, refer to the attachment on page
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the front
yard setback requirement for the Michael Marxer property.
TRI -LAND CO.
SURVEYING
SERVICES
4655 NICOLS ROAD
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122
j � 5
4� rq__
SITE PLAN FOR:
MICHAEL. a COLEEN
MARXER
6^
Z �
J1
=e
N 89031'56" E
150.00 j
Drainage o�rd WPI
� X220.000-oo 1
- -* r,
0 I LOT I r
90
N 0
o - vv;/
5�
o Dr*Jr+g9e and Arty Ewgemem;
993 150.00
E A S T
WESCOTT ROAD
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
10
N d'
N 0
ON
O
z
a
9;
LOT I , BLOCK I ,
GREENSBORO FIRST ADD.
according to the recorded plat thereof 73 SCALE I 30
DAKOTA County, Minnesota
=
PXr. nl
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty-three
WAIVER OF PLAT/DUPLEX LOT SPLIT FOR ADVANCE DEVELOPERS
F. Waiver of Plat to Allow a Duplex Lot Split for Advance
Developers on Lot 1, Block 1, Suncliff 3rd Addition --An application
was received from Advance Developers Inc. requesting a waiver of
plat to split three (3) duplex lots for individual ownership. The
applicant's properties are located in the northeast quadrant of
Beaver Dam Road and Deer Hills Trail, immediately south of Diffley
Road. All setbacks for this property meet code requirements and are
serviced by separate utilities. The zoning is planned development
under the Eagan Hills P.U.D.
If the waiver of plat application is approved, the property shall be
subject to all applicable ordinances. For a copy of the location
maapp and specific unit descriptions, refer to pages through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver
of plat to allow a duplex lot split for Advance Developers as
presented.
7�
A
Z
ur
W
1-
Q
U
O
N
N
4
mo
oQ
Z�
avoa NMVHHOVISce
a
�s S
I
z
OI Opp,Opp,
_ Q sfli tirp
O 1.y ~^
cc TlI/
Q !rM
W 1j H
QU OCl/
Q
Q
a�
1s1J
2 sfa
a1.1 Kd
Q �{� l I aM 0111
24
It#/ "Ol0-1
i
r
U �
a
NII 1�
01AF*
// p
LL Z . _ Tcw ne
O O / 1 °ICY
CL
U
1 5'
1
Ui z au lou V
x Iqy 2
f i
LL�� ar -10"
1/rJ 1fr/ 10 ` i7
�7 p
I ,Fl 9
I „
011
I w 0
e L =�
avoa wvo a3AV39
I
C.R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS Tel. 645.3646
181 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 55108
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
Foil: ADVANCE DEVELOPERS, INC
DEER / /lLL5 TX,414.
Lot 4, Dlock 1, SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION,
Dakota County, Minnesota exept the southeasterly
44.4 feet thereof.
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND
ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE. ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY.
FROM OR ON SAID LAND.
Dated this ZO day of NOUC ti`r/ A.D. 19 !7G C. R. WINDEN 6 ASSOCIATES. INC.
Av-m Zce kd /2 -/8 -BG
by
Surveyor, Minnesota Registration No.� G /q
D
I
i
i
��-�NO�YTh'ERN
/Y�ru.PNL
(� AS �Ompc�ny `gSE,NEyr
S 47' 20' SO" E
4J.60
f_EO
/
_
j
S�
u
A.4
rn
a
h�
oh
Scale: 1" = 30'
a N
x/885
=�
a�
o Denotes Iron Monument
2.1
'
I
!Y4 -92_, J
1
s
f
43.60
44.40
DEER / /lLL5 TX,414.
Lot 4, Dlock 1, SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION,
Dakota County, Minnesota exept the southeasterly
44.4 feet thereof.
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND
ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE. ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY.
FROM OR ON SAID LAND.
Dated this ZO day of NOUC ti`r/ A.D. 19 !7G C. R. WINDEN 6 ASSOCIATES. INC.
Av-m Zce kd /2 -/8 -BG
by
Surveyor, Minnesota Registration No.� G /q
D
I
i
i
C.R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS Tel. 645.3646
1381 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 55108
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR: ADVANCE DEVELOPERS, INC.
NO,YTHERAI NATURAL CAS COmPANY L A5EM elyr-,
1
13.60 _
0. 4r0
m
� � V
`CV I ,Z'Ovlfrwns 2 I n
2B--�--/
b.i QM W
#1893
m j
22.1 �,N 2.r 2 Scale: 1" 301.
t 9 Denotes Iron Monument
1p
e
93.60 49.90
5 SO'/F'E9'�E
DEER /7/LL5 /RANG
The southeasterly 44.4.fcet of
Lot 4, Block 1, SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION,
Dakota County, Minnesota
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF TIIE BOUNDARIES OF TIIE LAND
ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON. AND ALI. VISIBLE ENCROACIIMENTS. IF ANY,
FROM OR ON SAID LAND.
Dated this 70 day of /1/'j4C--%k/ A.D. 172/ C. R. WINDEN b ASSOCIATES, INC.
ISSwe loeoln/ /z•/g •g6
-77 by w•" f C.
Surveyor, Minnesota Registration No. l
C.R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS Tel. 6A5.3646
1381 EUSTIS ST., ST, PAUL, MINN. 53108
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR: ADVANCE DEVELOPERS, INC.
;..�Norlhern Naiurcgl Gas Compdng E asernenf
-
66.23 63.43
/ -1-
i_ S 5I inrn/
0' /
•� Q I F' 213
O
O
JrL�_ Scale: I"=30'
ry e Denotes Iron
�Monument
14.4 3 c.: � � i
550'14'29"E R• lei BE5j/.a �
�
4. /�•g8ep0..
DEE R HILLS T
That part of Lot 5, Block 1, SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION,
Dakota County, Minnesota lying northwesterly of a line
described as follows and its southwesterly prolongation:
Beginning at a.point on the northeast line of said
Lot 5 distant 63.43 feet northwest of the most easterly
corner of said Lot 5; thence southwesterly to a point
on the southwesterly line of said Lot 5 distant 37.87
feet northwesterly, measured along said southwesterly
line, from the most southerly corner of said Lot 5 and
said line there terminating.
WE iIEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF TIIF- BOUNDARIES OF TIIE LAND
ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, tF ANY,
FROH OR ON SAID LAND.
Dated thle L79 day of LklyA.D. 196� C. R. WINDEN h ASSOCIATES, INC.
AUse Loealed /Z•/8-86
g by ._•�'. L �_�'
Surveyor, Minnesota Registration No.J/ 7 9
Agenda Information
April 7, 1987, City
Page Twenty -Four
Memo
Council Meeting
SPECIAL PERMIT/DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR COLDWELL BANKER
G. Special Permit to Allow a 4' x 8' Two Directional Sign for
Coldwell Banker --A special permit application was submitted by
Coldwell Banker to allow a two directional sign located in the NW
1/4 of Section 34, adjacent to Cliff Road and across from Ches Mar
Drive. - This application was received prior to a special workshop
session that was held on Tuesday, March 31, and the City Council
determined that no additional advertising signs will be allowed and
further that existing advertising signs would be phased out during
the next two (2) years. Since the applicant has processed their
special permit and this item was advertised in the newspaper as an
official agenda item, they have the right to be heard and considered
by the City Council.
The City is proceeding with a review and revision of the temporary
advertising sign language in the City Code, however, that will not
be available for a final ratification until a May meeting.
For additional information on the special permit as presented by
Coldwell Banker, refer to the Pla ing Department report, a copy is
enclosed on pages 00 through .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the two -
directional sign as requested by Coldwell Banker.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT
APPLICANT: COLDWELL BANKER
(DALE MEANS)
LOCATION: 1370 CLIFF ROAD (NW 1/4 OF SECTION 34)
EXISTING ZONING: AGRICULTURE
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 7, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 24, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a special permit
to allow a two directional sign located in the NW 1/4 of Section 34,
adjacent to Cliff Road and across from Ches Mar Drive. The purpose
of a sign is to publicize the location of Wilderness Ponds, a single
family development recently approved by the Eagan City Council.
The subject sign is within the 'City Code requirement and has a
dimension of 4' x 8' for a total -of 32 square feet on each side.
The sign will consist of blue and brown colors and if approved by
the City Council, be at least 10' or more from the property line.
If approved, the sign shall be subject to all applicable sign
ordinances.
•`
��
,
?I
z
fi
Z.
•
� �
-
-
1-- {fit t {I;
{ 1
Proposal
For
Wilderness
Ponds-
L t
yyy��ppp4
Development
r'
• •
Sign
blue & brown09Cliff �y
- b
Road
/H1lNE PARI
/ -
Zi
z } Fl_AJ(E m HIGH SITE OR.' O + J
¢ O
z u {
Y
19
-SLDRIN-M----
J 9 W� t7
,RICE I-TAMARAC PT. \'
/ a r QUARRY PARK - 2- BIRCH PT. 7%
_ r•' 3- NORWAY Pr.
I BLUFF w 4- FOREST RIDGE T -i
6- IRONWOOD LN.
6- REDWOOD
7 - SPRUCE PT. i
VANIcf :, -�.:#C LE {hofs sC a'> ACF' xaaa•..,�-., J y;
x I I = J r 1 Co Re. No.OR
-
iti \��
WATER i 5 ,T I CENTRE Y�6---_- _r___ �J
'P N - yOP• rN KOST
TREATMENT - G ',4Y .' ® '
C -1
I FACILITY ¢ - OR '* 0LEARY PARK I
s S EEN •di a2 10
CARR/ACi
PUBLIC O W000 4• 31.
WORKS u I e .-ti .Q`th HILLS GOLF!r------------
GARAGE JX11 �3«)t i BLUE JAY COURSE
`\ iiip Cyl3 FSk , OUCKWOOO ' N
YIOLET _I'1'+ \ 1 J
I ¢
I WOO 3°CJ'vR � L• CK DR.
tVE
----- 4 f4 -
STRIDGEST.
_. LA !. _
¢i IRCHPONp LI12!I" S c2'
.BL E JAr WA/17� r` I �,fJ
z,!5fJIC
Y IA
ENGLE' KOLS7A T _ SUR
G' ' �tPVO, ��:CKH-0MK IJr � L4- pVE ; 3 SOUTH
I Pp 31 HILLS -R0. DEpRK .� Q ." SOUT}f
.'%i� -`•i s% 1 xFj r CT E. :S S � QI p�2 '�s' HILLS ' MAv LA.
` �,'h,:, i} y
FIRE' cFRT. AOM. 6 �i ARK DRMA E
qk` I COMM. ROOM�yo A4E LPTO 1 TRAIL ✓ L� so HI S w
•J _ __ _ 1 -"V�"Y �� SOE --
RD. •"*+ HIL S
xEscc pAKPT L AIR o • 4: 7I I~ h cr
F, �M:3COTT
O �IIrAGAN
SI
MUKCPAL IELA LIfFI
4 - u f j I � 'NST CR
Ca/YTER J h RD. ft
4,.. KCCyGS� I: WIN CRE WFSi P I� �la
z, 'MpOp Rpol P
RC-:,W
¢A L.tir. STy�W 'YAB
}• ' .. OCA„
DAVAVE ORT o I
�aLD AVE m W14DCREST
g; PARR
IDGEu NORTHVIEW PAR
ONI. D ERWOOD_ xl _r OR.-
_ I
jWRRY- h .
d PATCH ,a, _
P' RK P� ,r . - 55,121
WIlm
w
WLN.
bOLARK R0. 1 � c? jr Y �i � , w C
v' 1
i I
lo
. Lq 41 X�iA
co. Re N. ?o 14 _ r � � � = m'O (Co. Rd.
N R 3 = �
Q No. 3O
' OIFFLEY AO - '
w �y J a LSA. I < IFFLE
le
.a
LLEMSON EM,L'CK i W '¢ riORfS N PL.
S
Z � J � � •l. J � J 11d6L`LA NPL.
' CT. ++ SL.M I -,•y ST Y L LAKE Opp p1 FJ IT
T B4rL� j w VPN gW ST EOME - P i d �. �4'S pl. 'KE INGtON `O (It'ACKR1pRE rr
�q
CT -yoI'q N t a p N iL COAT C F
VERG/7FE IR.ra S7 S L o '. z u4 J zHILL
¢ �T PARK ¢
W ar 2 Y
S7LING CIEMSON PARK I Y CA o ] CC' M1
r- LIR. } ¢ WALNUT HILL
r� PARK j/
AQUARIUS LA (al
R
'.^"-;g `, •P i tiQ X02,+"1 WEOGW0py/3
�Rr
y�LL PARK a x /jVL�
41-L f tir r, I \ C �•. .ti�OR. OAK LEAf WATE OR,SUDB
�• ER v1
` CIR Y 3 .•pPRr-;,l'��� j j _¢ R r
QK
f": �m P'I'E PH LA„•, mq�, D
RR AVARK INE! •It 1'9 !l
LIRI SAFARI' C+ Y- LAK
i N �`P. ,PF ¢ 4- /�l py
3P LA. o_ Y _ \P' i6 pp'I'.
OAK POND
N'z' 'HILLS PARK
HZ a u z i
WAY
�—,-�I!BEA LA ICA. RQ No ORI
NARO•S CLIFF R
w Co. Rd No. 32) -CLIFF_..:
�a� H[TL d - EN
TON e'f
4 ? 3 ¢ LA
WALDENIr.
N£1GN73 Ir
y Y S a I PARK PARKVIEW
II Q �Z z AL Z. �J
`7 L GOLF
c ING N
�J ' • a o n'ILL
7
_ � 't ,rte I ; W �:'•� COURSE g _ All. ��v� •.�
��NN CIR. v P c
Pa
CAMP
r .
cIP• �:'.. 11�+ ! .V \\�9i �I�.� BUTWIN
A MEMBER Of THE SEARS FINANCIAL NETWORK
g
COLDWELL BANKER
RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES
7495 W te7TH STREET
APPLE VALLEY MN 55124
(612) 432-0020
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Permission is hereby granted to Dale Means - Coldweil Banker to
install a Development Sign on my Property.
NAME
—CM2 " C � 6 / 17e, �
DATE
I
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Five
WAIVER OF PLAT/JAMES UNRER, CLEARVIEW ADDITION
H. Waiver of Plat (James Unker) in Order to Split Lot 10, Block 3,
Clearview Addition Into Two Separate 1/2 Acre Parcels --A public
hearing was first held by the Advisory Planning Commission at the
February 26 meeting to consider a waiver of plat application to
split Lot 10, Block 3 of the Clearview Addition into two (2)
separate parcels sharing a common accesss on the north side of Cliff
Road. The APC continued the application for 30 days raising concern
with several conditions that were originally contained in the
staff's report. At the March 24, 1987 meeting, the APC again
considered the waiver of plat application and is recommending
approval of the lot split as presented with modification to the
original conditions.
For a copy of the staff report submitted for the February 26
meeting and the revisions that pertain mainly to the Engineering
Department, refer to a copy of that port dated March 19, 1987.
These reports are enclosed on pages through
For a copy of the APC minutes on both the February 26 and March 24
meetings, refer to pages /D Y through .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver
of plat as requested by James Unker for a lot split of Lot 10, Block
3, Clearview Addition.
01
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: JAMES UNKER
LOCATION: LOT 10, BLOCK 3, CLEARVIEW ADDITION
SE 1/4 OF SECTION 29
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 26, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 13, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by James Unker of
1775 Cliff Road, requesting a waiver of plat in order to split Lot
10, Block 3, of the Clearview Addition into two separate parcels
sharing a common access on the north side of Cliff Road, just east
of Lenore Lane.
Parcel A, containing the existing home will measure 188 feet x 280
feet (27,518 S.F.). Parcel B will measure 90 feet x 280 feet (25,200
S.F.). The applicant intends to build another single family home on
Parcel B and has stated that he would not propose any additional
splits in the future. An additional access to Lenore Lane and full
platting requirements will be required if in the future the creation
of another lot is desired.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer is available from the existing 8"
lateral and manhole in the southeast corner of Lot 10. The
elevation of this sanitary sewer requires a minimum basement floor
elevation of 940.0 for any house constructed on Parcel B (west half
of Lot 10). In order to provide service for Parcel B, an easement
will have to be dedicated across Parcel A (east half of Lot 10). In
addition, due to the minimum elevations and the existing topography
of the property, this seer service will have to be insulated as it
crosses under the existing driveway presently servicing the existing
house on proposed Parcel A. The alignment of this sewer service
should be directed through the existing opening in the grove of
trees on this property.
There is presently an existing water service for the existing house
on proposed Parcel A. A new water service will have to be installed
to provide service to the newly created lot (Parcel B). Either a
new water service will have to be bored underneath Cliff Road (no
open cuts allowed), or an easement will have to'be acquired from Lot
9 on the west to allow connection to the existing water main in
Lenore Lane. Due, to the complexities involved with either
alternate, it is anticipated that this water service will be
relatively expensive. 96
GRADING & DRAINAGE: There is presently a landlocked low drainage
basin over the common lot line of existing Lots 9 and 10 of Block 3,
Clearview Addition. This drainage basin presently serves the east
one-third of Lot 9, the south two-thirds of Parcel B and the south
one-third of Parcel A, and a small portion of Outlot B of Woodgate
2nd Addition to the east. If this Waiver is approved, a storm sewer
outlet should be constructed for this drainage basin draining the
outlet into the Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north and not into the
existing storm sewer system along Cliff Road.
STREETS/DRIVEWAYS: Cliff Road (County Road 32) is presently
classified as a minor arterial. Subseqently, it is anticipated that
the County will not allow an additional driveway access associated
with this lot split. Therefore, it should be a condition of this
Waiver that restricted access control be`dedicated across the entire
frontage of Lot 10 (both Parcels A and B) allowing only a singular
driveway access at its present location to be shared by both lots.
EASEMENTS/PERMITS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY: Sufficient right-of-way has bee -
previously dedicated to accommodate the existing Cliff Road sectio;
In addition, the County has retained a 25' construction easement
across the south portion of Lot 10 to accommodate any potential
future reconstruction activities that may be necessary.
Either a permit from the County Highway Department or an easement
from the owner of Lot 9 must be obtained prior to final approval
providing for the accessibility of a new water service for the newly
created lot.
Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be acquired and/or
dedicated to accommodate the storm water outlet from the existing
low drainage basin presently existing along the west side of Lot 10
to the Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north.
A sanitary sewer service easement shall be dedicated across t
southeast corner of Lot 10 (Parcel A) to accommodate the sew -r
service extension to service Parcel B.
A cross easement shall be executed providing for common use of the
existing driveway for the newly created parcel and the existing
house.
c
e,
ASSESSMENTS: Lot 10, Block 3, of Clearview Addition was previously
assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer and trunk area water main for
its existing one lot use. Any subsequent subdivisions will have to
pay the additional per lot equivalent for these related trunk, area
assessments.
The entire frontage of Lot 10 had been previously assessed for Cliff
Road improvements. Therefore, no additional street related
assessments are associated with this proposed split.
Trunk area storm sewer has not yet been levied over any of the lots
within the Clearview Addition. Therefore, the entire area of Lot 10
is subject to trunk area storm sewer assessments as a condition of
this approval.
Lateral benefit from existing water main will be required as a
condition of approval to allow connection of the additional water
service. All these assessment obligations are identified as
follows:
ITEM
QUANTITY
RATE
A14OUNT
PROJECT #
Trunk Area
Sanitary Sewer
1 Lot
$625/Lot
$625
86-A
Trunk Area
Water Main
1 Lot
$600/Lot
$600
147
Trunk Area
Storm Sewer
52,000 sf
$0.053/sf
$2,794
235
Lateral Benefit
from Water Main
90 if
$12.47
$1,122
235
Final assessment obligations will be based on final quantities and
rates in effect at the time of final waiver of platting approval.
SOILS: Due to the existing low drainage basin incorporating a major
portion of the proposed newly created lot and the limited area for
constructing a single-family house, it is strongly recommended that
a soils investigation study be completed to ensure adequate
foundation material exists for a new house.
41
CONDITIONS JAMES DNKER:
1. All applicable Code requirements shall be adhered to.
2. Any further divisions of Lot 10 will require a replatting
process.
3. This waiver shall be subject to a parks dedication fee.
4. Either a permanent and construction easement shall be obtained
from Lot 9 or a County utility permit shall be obtained to
allow construction of the required water service for the newly
created lot.
5. A sanitary sewer service easement shall be dedicated over the
southeast portion of Lot 10 as required to provide sanitary
sewer service to the newly created parcel (west half).
6. A drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated and a storm j
sewer outlet shall be constructed from the existing low
drainage basin on the west side of Lot 10 to the Woodgate pond
(BP -22) to the north.
7. A restrictive access control easement shall be dedicated to the
County Highway Department across the entire frontage of Lot 10
with the exception of the existing driveway access location.
S. A cross easement shall be provided allowing common use of the
existing.driveway for both newly created parcels.
9. Minimum floor elevation of the new house shall be established
at 940.0, and the sanitary sewer service construction shall be
properly insulated.
10. A soils investigation report shall be prepared verifying
adequate soils to accommodate a new building site.'
11. This development shall be responsible for any outstanding,
unlevied or deferred assessments or other financial obligations i
associated with this development at the rates in effect at the
time of final approval.
12. Sanitary sewer and water services shall be installed to the
lot line of the newly created lot as a condition of approval.
SIGMA
SURVEYING'
SERVICES
3908 Sibley Memorial Highway
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Phone: (612) 452-3077
t;T
P.O.I.
Lot Division Certificate Fot.
Mr. JIM UNKER
'c3 I
EAST 189.00 - I
nn7f
O PAL.
d PARCEL
OD
25,200 Sq. Ft.
z , 7I
�i qo.c
Z ,I
: 01 I "`—
PARCEL' r I
A x
27,518 Sq.Ft. �W
r col
� N
W I •� I N
A i
u
i � � • Zp,6 � � i
x"
fix
Q C I
Proposed
� �'�� ' / w - 7 DRIVEWAY N la 0%
�r ,� I•-td�. �P9, / �e / o? / EASEMENT
_
G ram .a -k a I
Zoo OD.
... 9't 5 6 e
E$T 87.56
- PP__._.- 125.2 •—. _—. .�_
_ _C_ur6�
( CL 1 FF ROAD)
96
-N-
1 1�I=5o
i:0
C.S.A.H. No. 32
91
L�
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: ENGINEERING DIVISION
DATE: MARCH 19, 1987
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT - JAMES LINKER (LOT 10, BLOCK 3 CLEARVIEW
ADDITION)
At the February 26 Planning Commission meeting, the above -referenced
application was continued for 30 days due to the applicant's concern
with several conditions of approval that were contained in the
staff's report. A copy of the original staff report and conditions
is again presented to the Planning Commission for their review and
reference during consideration of this item.
Also attached is a copy of a letter from the attorney representing
Mr. Unker addressing their concerns regarding the conditions of
approval.
The following is staff's response to their comments as identified in
that letter:
#4 Revised condition is the same as staff's original
condition.
#5 Revised condition is the same as as staff's original
condition. k
-
#6 The staff is agreeable to revising the original condition
to provide for a grading plan that would allow overland
drainage in lieu of the required storm sewer. However,
staff objects to deferring this condition until issuance
of building permit as it is critical tQ mak.ing this
proposed newly created lot a buildable lot.
#7 Staff has no objection to their proposed revision.
#9 Staff has no objection to their proposed revision.
#10 Staff has no objection to their proposed revision.
#11 Staff does not agree with the proposed condition revision.
Through the creation of a new buildable lot, all
outstanding, unlevied or deferred assessments should be
brought up to date as a condition 'of creating this new
parcel.. Detailed assessment checks are not routinely
performed with building permit applications. This is
based on the City's policy that all assessment obligations
are current at the time of creating a buildable lot. 'The
trunk,area storm sewer should be an obligation whether or
not an internal lateral storm sewer system is installed. .
#12 Staff objects to the proposed revision. Through the
creation of a new buildable lot, it is City policy to
ensure that it is properly serviced with sanitary sewer
and water services in// addition to adequate street access.
(/
/ 1
' N
The staff will be available to discuss our response to their
proposed revision in further detail at the Planning Commission
meeting.
Director of Public Works
TAC/jj
MINNESOTA OFFICE:
4635 NICOLS RD. - SUITE 206
EAGAN. MN 55122
(6121454-5440
March 6, 1987
SCHEIDE, STAHNKE & SMITH, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PHILIP N. SCHEIDE •
BRADLEY SMITH •'
KATHRYN COOPER STAHNKE "
CARRIE G. MARSH "
• Admitted to Praoice in Minnnota. Wisconsin, and West Virginia
— Admitted to Practice in Minnesota
Planning and Engineering Departments
City of Eagan
Eagan Municipal Center
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: James Unker
Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview
Dear Planning and Engineering Departments:
I have reviewed with James Unker the City Staff report dated February
13, 1987 and on his behalf would propose certain changes to the
proposed conditions for the purpose of allowing added flexibility for
Mr. Unker's ultimate development of the property.
A. Mr. Unker would like to clarify that while he has no present
intention to propose future lot splits, he would like to
leave that option open, with the understanding that the
formal platting process would have to be followed at that
time.
B. We understand that a sanitary sewer connection to Parcel B
could be done by gravity connection or a pumped connection.
If a gravity connection is used the 940 foot minimum
elevation is appropriate. If a pumped connection is made, we
prefer that the minimum elevation not be required.
C. To the extent possible, Mr. Unker would prefer to use
utility easements along the lot line between Lots 8 and 9,
Block 3, Clearview for connecting sanitary sewer and water
to Lenore Lane. He understands that additional easements,
either temporary, permanent or both, may be necessary, and
to the extent necessary, he would agree to be responsible
for obtaining additional easements.
D. While the report does not specifically state this, we assume
that utility lines and services would not„need to be
installed until the time of construction on Parcel B.
E. Mr. Unker would like the option to fill and grade Lot 10 to
provide natural storm water drainage to the pond, rather
than install a storm sewer line on the lot. Any filling and
grading would only be done after approval by the City of an
appropriate grading plan.
q3
SCHEIDE, STAHNKE & SMITH, P.A.
Page Two
Planning and Engineering Departments
March 6, 1987
F. The restrictive access control easement is acceptable, if
the allowed access width is 20 feet at the current location.
Mr. Unker will deal directly with the County on this issue
and merely wants City approval for up to 20 feet in width
subject to County approval.
G. Mr. Unker is unsure when actual construction of a home will
start on Parcel B and he would prefer to have utility
assessments levied at the time of construction at rates in
effect at that time.
H. Mr. Unker has no objection to paying storm sewer assessments
if he actually does have storm sewer constructed on the
property, and in that event he would agree to assessments at
the rates then in effect. If no storm sewer is constructed,
he does not believe he should pay storm sewer assessments
because the property will not benefit, and because the other
parcels in Clearview Addition, including previous lot
splits, have not been subject to such assessments.
Based upon these comments, we would propose the following revised
conditions:
4. Either a permanent and/or construction easement shall be
obtained, if necessary, from Lot 9, or a county utility
permit shall be obtained to allow construction of the
required water service for the newly created lot.
5. A sanitary sewer service easement shall be dedicated over
the southeast portion of Lot 10 as required to provide
sanitary sewer service to the newly created parcel (west
half) ,�
6. A drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated and a
storm sewer outlet shall be constructed from the existing
low drainage basin on the west side of Lot 10 to the
Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north, or in the alternative,
the property shall be filled and graded at the time of
building construction, according to a grading plan
acceptable to the City to provide natural storm water
drainage into the pond to the north.
q4
SCHEIDE, STAHNKE & SMITH, P.A.
Page Three
Planning and Engineering Departments
March 6, 1987
7. A restrictive access control easement shall be dedicated to
the County Highway Department across the entire frontage of
Lot 10 with the exception of the existing driveway access
location, with the allowed access to be up to 20 feet wide,
subject to County approval.
9. Minimum floor elevation of the new house shall be
established at 940.0, if a gravity line is installed. In the
alternative, if a pumped line is installed, there shall be
no minimum floor elevation. The sanitary sewer service
construction shall be properly insulated.
10. A soils investigation report shall be prepared verifying
adequate soils to accommodate a new building site, prior to
construction.
11. This development shall be responsible for any outstanding,
unlevied or deferred assessments or other financial
obligations associated with this development at the rates in
effect at the time of construction on Parcel B, with the
exception of storm sewer assessments, which shall be payable
only if a storm sewer line is constructed on Lot 10.
12. Sanitary sewer and water services shall be installed to the
lot line at time of building construction.
We would be most appreciative if you could give serious consideration
to these proposed revisions.
Very truly yours,
Bradley th
BS:kmb
cc: James Unker
12
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: JAMES UNKER
LOCATION: LOT 10, BLOCK 3, CLEARVIEW ADDITION
SE 1/4 OF SECTION 29
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 26, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 13, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by James Unker of
1775 Cliff Road, requesting a waiver of plat in order to split Lot
10, Block 3, of the Clearview Addition into two separate parcels
sharing a common access on the north side of Cliff Road, just east
of Lenore Lane.
Parcel A, containing the existing home will measure 188 feet x 280
feet (27,518 S.F.). Parcel B will measure 90 feet x 280 feet (25,200
S.F.). The applicant intends to build another single family home on
Parcel B and has stated that he would not propose any additional
splits in the future. An additional access to Lenore Lane and full
platting requirements will be required if in the future the creation
of another lot is desired.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer is available from the existing 8"
lateral and manhole in the southeast corner of Lot 10. The
elevation of this sanitary sewer requires a minimum basement floor
elevation of 940.0 for any house constructed on Parcel B (west half
of Lot 10). In order to provide service for Parcel B, an easement
will have to be dedicated across Parcel A (east half of Lot 10). In
addition, due to the minimuvlelevations and the existing topography
of the property, this sewer service will have to be insulated as it
crosses under the existing driveway presently servicing the existing i
house on proposed Parcel A. The alignment of this sewer service
should be directed through the existing opening in the grove of
trees on this property.
There ispresently an existing water service for the existing house
on proposed Parcel A. A new water service will have to be installed ;
to provide service to the newly created lot (Parcel B). Either a
new water service will have to be bored underneath Cliff Road (no !�
open cuts allowed), or an easement will have to'be acquired from Lot
9 on the west to allow connection to the existing water main.in
Lenore Lane. Due to the complexities involved with either
alternate, it is anticipated that this water service will be i
relatively expensive. n� I,
n 4
GRADING & DRAINAGE: There is presently a landlocked low drainage
basin over the common lot line of existing Lots 9 and 10 of Block 3,
Clearview Addition. This drainage basin presently serves the east
one-third of Lot 9, the south two-thirds of Parcel B and the south
one-third of Parcel A, and a small portion of Outlot B of Woodgate
2nd Addition to the east. If this Waiver is approved, a storm sewer
outlet should be constructed for this drainage basin draining the
outlet into the Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north and not into the
existing storm sewer system along Cliff Road.
STREETS/DRIVEWAYS: Cliff Road (County Road 32) is presently
classified as a minor arterial. Subsegently, it is anticipated that
the County will not allow an additional driveway access associated
with this lot split. Therefore, it should be a condition of this
Waiver that restricted access control be dedicated across the entire
frontage of Lot 10 (both Parcels A and B) allowing only a singular
driveway access at its present location to be shared by both lots.
EASEMENTS/PERMITS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY: Sufficient right-of-way has been
previously dedicated to accommodate the existing Cliff Road section.
In addition, the County has retained a 25' construction easement
across the south portion of Lot 10 to accommodate any potential
future reconstruction activities that may be necessary.
Either a permit from the County Highway Department or an easement
from the owner of Lot 9 must be obtained prior to final approval
providing for the accessibility of a new water service for the newly
created lot.
Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be acquired and/or
dedicated to accommodate the storm water outlet from the existing
low drainage basin presently existing along the west side of Lot 10
to the Woodgate pond (BP -22) to the north.
A sanitary sewer service easement shall be dedicated across the
southeast corner of Lot 10 (Parcel A) to accommodate the sewer
service extension to service Parcel B.
A cross easement shall'be'executed providing for common use of the
existing driveway for the newly created parcel and the existing
house.
ASSESSMENTS: Lot 10, Bloc), 3, of Clearvie; Addition was previously
assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer and trunk area water main for
its existing one lot use. i.ny subsequent suudivisions will have to
pay the additional per lot ecu
ivalent for these related trunl: area
assessments.
The entire front«ge of Lot 10 lnad been previously ilssesseUl for Cliff
Road improvements. Therefore, no additional streat related
assessments are associated with this propose(; split.
'I`runl; area storm sewer has not yet been levied over any of the lots
within the Clearview Addition. T;zerefore, the entire area of Lot 10
is su'.Djeet to trunk area storm sewer assessments as a condition of
this approval.
Lateral benefit from existing water main will be rec;uired as a
condition of approval to allow connection of tae additional grater
service. All these assessment obligations are identified as
follows:
ITEIM
QUANTITY
IUj,TE
A1,10M;_:T
PROJECT t
Trun:; Area
Lianitar1� Sewer
1 L_ot
$v25/Lot
$025
c7J—
I'runk Area
1�Fater Lain
1 Lot
$600/Lot
$6.00
17
Trunk Area
Storm :,ec',er
52,000 sf
$U.053/sr
Y', 7---
^?�
I
Lateral Benefit for
90 LF
i Sanitary Sewer
(Parcel "B")$30.12
$2,710.80
235
Latera1.Lenefit
from Seater Xain
7U if
$12.47
$1,122
2;5
QTAL
$7,851.80
i Final assessr.ient obligations wi be base:
on final quantities
ane.
rates in effect at
t;ie. time of
final waiver
of platting approval.
SOILS: Due to the existi_zr lol; drainage basin incorporating a major
portion of tie proposes: newly creates: lot and the lir:itesa area for
constructing a single-family house, it is strongly recommerdec: that
a sciis investigation stu,ly be completed to ensue adequato
fcuniation material exists for a new house.
CONDITIONS JAMES QNKER:
1. All applicable Code requirements shall be adhered to.
2. Any further divisions of Lot 10 will require a replatting
process.
3. This waiver shall be subject to a parks dedication fee.
4. Either a permanent and construction easement shall be obtained
from Lot 9 or a County utility permit shall be obtained to
allow construction of the required water service for the newly
created lot.
5. A sanitary sewer service easement shall' be dedicated over the
southeast portion of Lot 10 as required to provide sanitary
sewer service to the newly created parcel (west half).
6. A drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated and a storm
sewer outlet shall be constructed from the existing low
drainage basin on the west side of Lot 10 to the Woodgate pond
(BP -22) to the north.
7. A restrictive access control easement shall be dedicated to the
County Highway Department across the entire frontage of Lot 10
with the exception of the existing driveway access location.
3. A cross easement shall be provided allowing common use of the
existing driveway for both newly created parcels.
>vY;.,9. Minimum floor elevation of the new house shall be established
at 940.0, and the sanitary sewer service construction shall be
properly insulated.
10. A soils investigation .report .shall be prepared verifying
adequate soils to accommodate a new building site.,
'll. This development shall be responsible for any outstanding,
unlevied or deferred assessments or other financial obligations
associated with this development at the rates in effect at the '
time of final approval. 4
12. Sanitary sewer and water services shall be installed to the "
lot line of the newly created lot as a condition of approval. ?
9s
RB
y!
It
PK
AI
SIGMA
S U RVEYI N G' Lot Division Certificate Fof:
SERVICE Mr. JIM LINKER
3908 Sibley Memorial Highway
` Eagan. Minnesota 55122
Phone: (612) 452-3077
LU
Z
a
J
EA Sr 189.00 -,
i
90. -
`� �o�a
,
\
r 1
94. o -
I
PARCEL
'Ar
00
27,518 Sq.Ft. IW
j I
I PARCEL
-
Ox
CO
t
�,-our �'•.,•
I
o
N
®
25,200 Sq. Ft.
,
I ^ I a
N
m
N"
i•" N
_
N1 Y
s
Z I
10.0
!'
xJ
y� psl
-
O
I PP
r /,
Proposed
��� / �v
:;—DRIVEWAYIJ I` lox
in I—t!nL. �p9/ /! / / O? / EASEMENT
LU
i
�i'P
ISO- I . l ' t
...Zoo 00 .56
--#'--- �-
E$1—_1875 ._
Pse lzs,z
-:YISti.•� u•;+•i:,. s �'I •�r1: :3'.::.-:—.�.: .w .. � ti�-I .•.\i -1••e
(CLIFF ROAD) C.S`A.H. No
• � 11,50 - ' - .i
J
CJ
is c.Z
n
1
,
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING - EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
MARCH 24, 1987
A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was
held on Tuesday, March 24, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal
Center. Present were Chairman Hall, Members Gustafson, Voracek,
Trygg, McCrea, Harrison and Krisnik. Also present were City Planner
Dale Runkle, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Assistant City
Engineer Mike Foertsch and Assistant City Attorney David Keller.
AGENDA
Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the agenda, noting that items A and B under Old Business shall be
continued until the traffic study is completed. Chairman Hall asked
the audience if anyone was present in regard to items A and B under
old business. There was no response. The agenda was approved as
changed. All voted yes.
MINUTES
Chairman Hall noted that the minutes from the February 24, 1987
regular meeting incorrectly indicated on pages 3 and 15, that he had
made motions when in fact he was not present that evening. Harrison
moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
minutes with the corrections indicated. All voted in favor.
Harrison moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the minutes for the February 26, 1987 regular meeting.
All voted yea.
WAIVER OF PLAT - JAMES UNKER
Chairman Hall called the first public hearing of the evening in
regard to the application of James Unker to split Lot 10, Block 3,
Clearview Addition into two separate 1/2 acre parcels abutting Cliff
Road to the South and east of Lenore Lane in the southeast quarter
of Section 29. Mr. Runkle gave a brief history of the proposal,
which had been continued from the previous month's Advisory Planning
Commission meeting. Mr. Foertsch briefly described the engineering
issues and easements. Mr. Brad Smith, attorney for Mr. Unker, was
present to respond.
1
APC Minutes
March 24, 1987
Mr. Smith indicated that Mr. Unker could Com 1
conditions suggested by staff, and indicated that P n with the
completed immediately but applicant would grading would be
easements and hold up construction of
until the location utilitiesefor theosecondvlot
of the home was determined, and requested that
any assessment for storm sewer be delayed until the remainder of the
Clearview Addition was assessed. It
applicant would like to keep open the was indicated that the
splits, as there was a remote Possibility of part of the
future lot
Parcel with Mr. Amundson's parc`lotolcreate of
fcul-de-sac from Lenore
Lane.
In response to Member McCrea's question regarding the timing of
the levying of assessments, Mr. Colbert indicated that it had been
City policy to bring assessments up
development to prevent any surprisetoo adat` at the time of
buyer. In
response to member Voracek's question in regardtial tottile location of
the utility lines, Mr. Foertsch indicated that again the policy was
based on the desire to
indicated that the extensiionsewould ct oonly lbe toal utheslot dli�ne and no
Colbert
affect the location of the home. t
assessments, Mr. Colbert indicated that the regard to storm sewer
Pond to the north of the
Property did have a storm sewer outlet and the property had not been
assessed in this regard.
McCrea moved, Krisnik seconded the m
otinrecommend
of the waiver of plat, subject to the followingtconditions: approval
1. All applicable Code requirements shall be adhered to.
2• Any further divisions of Lot
process. 10 will require a replatting
3. This waiver shall be subject to a parks dedication fee.
4. Either a permanent and/or construction easement shall be
obtained, if necessary, from Lot 9, or a county utility
be obtained to allow construction of the required waterpermit servicehfor
the newly created lot.
5. A sanitary sewer service easement shall be dedicated over
the southeast portion of Lot 10 as required to
sewer service to the newly created parcel provide sanitary
(west half).
6. A drainage and utility easement
storm sewer outlet shall be constructedshall frombethedicexistdingnlow
drainage basin on the west side of Lot 10 to the Woodgate Pond (BP_
22) to the north.
/63
K
APC Minutes
March 24, 1987
d to
7. A restrictive access °ntrol acrossethe1nentirent hafrontagebe dofaLoa 10
the County Highway Department
with the exception of the existing driveway access location.
B. A cross easement shall be provided allowing common use of
the existing driveway for both newly created parcels.
e shall be
9. Minimum floor elevaesanitary s
lhwerservice new sconstruction
established at 940.0, and to
shall be properly insulated.
10. A soil investigation report shall be prepared verifying
adequate soils to accommodate a new building site.
11. This development shall be responsible for any outstanding,
ligions
unlevied or deferredassesn t the ratesother or financial
b
ineffectattheattime
associated with this development
of final approval. shall be installed
12. Sanitary sewer and water seras alcondition of approvals to the
lot line of the newly created
All voted in favor, except Harrison who voted against.
OVERVIEW 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
public hearing of the evening convened by Chairman
The second p ng
Hall was in regard to the application of Dunn Real Estate for a
preliminary plat consisting of one .98 acre lot on Oust°north
Overview Estates RRoadt located °Plannerthe `sDale d Runklee of introducedthe
of Golden Meadowparcel
proposal, which was to pent left this oas sane outlot lfoor opotential
family lot, which had be
combination with adjacent property for development. Mr. Runkla
aring
indicated that
neighbors
Ed Dunnaexpressed
was presentand answered questions.
neighborhood park. Mr. Ed
Ms. Deb Schad of 4332 Stirrup Street appeared and distributed a
letter drafted on behalf °� neighbor in
1731egGolden to tMeadowosRoadn
for a local park. Mr. Ric
which Mr. Runkle indicated was for one
questioned the type of use
single family home. In response to Chairman Hall's question, Mr.
vie
Runkle indicated that the Park Commission would reHarrison rmoved,
subsequent to the Planning
Commission meeting- roya
Gustafson seconded of the
the motion to recommend app
preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
.2. Driveway access onto Dodd Road shall be allowed.
/D
3
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Six
PRELIMINARY PLAT OVERVIEW 2ND ADDITION
I. Preliminary Plat for Overview 2nd Addition Consisting of a .98
Acre Lot Located on the West Side of Dodd Road, North of Golden
Meadow Road --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning
Commission at the March 24, 1987 meeting, to consider an application
submitted by Dunn Real Estate for a preliminary plat entitled
Overview 2nd Addition. This plat consists of a .98 acre lot on
Outlot A of Overview Estates Replat. The APC is recommending
approval.
For additional information on t is item, ref r to the staff report,
a copy is enclosed on pages through.
A letter was sent to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
and Parks and Recreation -Director b�4.
sidents of this area, a copy
is enclosed on pages J �/ throughThis letter is suggesting
that the City acquire and develop.98 acre parcel, proposed as
Overview 2nd Addition, for City park land. The Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission met on Thursday, April 2, 1987 and reviewed
the neighborhood request and is recommending to the City Council
that the land not be purchased or developed for park land purposes.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat entitled Overview 2nd Addition.
R
•�l
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: DUNN REAL ESTATE
LOCATION: NA SECTION 25
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (WITHIN LEXINGTON SOUTH PD)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Prelim-
inary Plat for the Overview 2nd Addition. This plat consists of one
.98 acre lot on Outlot A, Overview Estates Replat. This site is lo-
cated on the west side of Dodd Road just north of Golden Meadow Road.
The area to the west and south is R-1 (Overview Estates Replat) and
the R-1 (Haeg Addition) Outlot is to the north. That plat, approved
in July 1985, called for 8 single family lots on approximately five
acres - built-in 2 phases. The first phase was for 4 lots abutting
Hackmore Drive on the north and an Outlot (Phase 2) on the south. A
condition of approval stated that the driveway entrances for Phase 2
shall be constructed so that lots l and 2 have a common driveway and
lots 3 and 4 have a common driveway to Dodd Road. The subject lot
has 130 feet of frontage where the 4 proposed lots in the Haeg Add-
ition are 91 feet wide. The land is open and falls gently to the
� xF= ;`s> '_ northwest.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water service stubs have been
provided to the property line of this proposed lot. The service
stubs are of sufficient size and depth to provide adequate -service
to the lot.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE: The,lot currently drains to the northwest
across the existing residential development abutting the west side
of the lot, and then to the existing catch basins on Stirrup Street.
The proposed development offers no adverse affect to the existing
drainage patterns. The limited amount of extra storm water runoff
that will be generated from the addition of one: single family house
is not significant.
STREETS/DRAINAGE: The proposed lot will have its driveway access
onto Dodd Road and this access should be allowed. Dodd Road is -on
the City's municipal state aid street system but has not been
upgraded to state aid standards. Dodd Road is currently a 34 ft.
wide street with bituminous curb. In the future, . it wi 11 be
upgraded to a 44 ft. wide street with concrete curb and gutter.
The abutting properties along Dodd Road will be assessed for the
improvements to the street. Municipal state aid funds will also be
used to pay for a portion of ;he'upgrading of Dodd Road.
s
a
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAYS: The appropriate common side and rear lot
line drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated.
A 50 ft. half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd Road.
ASSESSMENTS: The property proposed to be platted under this
application was assessed for the following improvements:
PROJECT # DESCRIPTION USAGE
241 Dodd Road (Restoration) S.F.
278A Water Area S.F.
278A Sanitary Sewer Trunk S.F.
278A Storm Sewer Trunk S.F.
There are no pending assessments against the property.
The following are the proposed assessments for this plat:
Proj. # Description Usage Rate Quantity Amt.
241 Dodd Rd. Upgrade S.F.* 8.70/F.F. 130.75 F.F. $1,138
241 Water Lateral Benefit S.F. 12.47/F.F. 130.75 F.F. 1,630
Trailways 12.40/F.F. 130.75 F.F. 1,620
Total $4,388
*Prorata increase of Dodd Road to residential equivalent.
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
final quantities contained in the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: OVERVIEW
1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
2. Driveway access onto Dodd Road shall be allowed.
3. Appropriate common side and rear lot line easements shall
be dedicated for Dodd Road.
4. A 50 ft. half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd Road.
5. This lot shall be subject to a Parks Dedication Fee.
/07
C-YVT.—Y IVv— #-tp/r
4
16
I
I
J 3lk
4
sit,
a�E
4MY$
A
•�
I_
F— 90 —
I i !o -T •I r— 90 —
t— -i30 — -�
•ap
1
A4
'T
1QQ
t
F-
�:
3vh
z
p
Sco
vz
W
wIr
¢°
fo
3
j '
Seo. ar ..
. ••�'
1
�
6
ovTtor q
I �
I
i
10
?reliminary Plat:
OVERVIEW SECOND ADDITION
Sheet 1 of 2
F- 40
--� '-iA IE' %,'3 FI RS ;_ AD411Y10N'
329.89 N 69°46'05E
e= W I 'W
to (D LOT I ,,�
M . CO
i
I 90
N
0-- N" 5 BLOC K I b
J , to
j �_ _ _
(D— — 312.36 N8 11284E ' 1
0 V E- R 1'1:-W ,_ T AT E., gEF'LAT
STREET ASSESSMENT UPGRADE 130.75'
TRAILWAY 130.75'
GOLDEN MEADOW ROAD
Preliminary Plat: OVERVIEW SECOND ADDITI N'
Fee Owner: Dunn Real Estate Management Inc.
4194 Knob Circle
Eagan, MN 55122 Tel. 452-1561
Legal Description: Outlot A, OVERVIEW ESTTAES REPLAT, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota.
Zoning: R-1, Single Family Residential
Notes: 1)Lot has existing sanitary sewer and water stubed to
property.
2) Contains 41,740 square feet.
Date of Preparation: February 10, 1987
Preliminary Plat:
nVF.RVfEW SECOND ADDITION
.0
:tj
w,
L
-=
329.89 N89°46'05�E
L 0 T
0-
5
BLOCK
—
—
312.361
N 89°}41
28 E '
ri V rL---R E -W
i
,_TATS REPLAT
GOLDEN MEADOW ROAD
Preliminary Plat:
Fee Owner:
1 40 t
WATER LATERAL BENEFFT 130.75'
OVERVIEW SECOND ADDITI N'
Dunn Real Estate Management Inc.
4194 Knob Circle
Eagan, MN 55122 Tel. 452-1561
Legal Description: Outlot A, OVERVIEW ESTTAES REPLAT, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota.
Zoning: R-1, Single Family Residential
Notes: 1)Lot has existing sanitary sewer and water stubed to
property.
2) Contains 41,740 square feet.
Date of Preparation: February 10, 1987
/�D
12"
72 750.4/67.0 38.4/56.0 1
:1:19) 54.6/ 71.0
611
0 53.1 /68.0 t. 50.3/67.0
117 53.7/M0
P A I Al
i`2'
:t�78) 51.4/65.0
18.4/29.0 i::i i 116 66.7/85.0
180 :D.
53.!
9N
QAO- 6 M.G. GROUND STORAGE
5000 G.P.M. BOOSTER
H.W.L. 1059
42.2/58.
183 0
182 183 24
68.0/
7210, 2011 120 187 39.0J54 9
H tL 30
12" 1�184 68.7/ 74.0 4 185 1 85.2 /95.0 1818 UL;,, 51000. NO. 42
74.4/82.0 16e
84.5/95.0 .........
189D 1211
20"
0
70.8/76.
d7 16"
1
45.6/58.0 12
2011
-26
r02 0 ... .... .. . ............. ..
-
(203) 43,3/58.0 884/9§0
.d- 20295
�7 74.6/170
1
4 2
47.5/63.0 50.6/66.0
OVERVIEW
9 3.7/ 104 a:
16
OVERHIL.L:..
2nd ADD.
SUBJECT PARCEL
.................
o
83.3,95.0
1.91
FIG. +3
city of eaganapproved: standard
. WATER plate #:
PUBLIC
WORKS MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT� 41t I I I
a
March 18, 1987
Roger Martin, Chairman
Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Ken Vraa, Director
Parks & Recreation Department
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Sirs:
We, the members of the community residing in or near the
development known as Overview Estates wish to submit a proposal
to the Parks & Recreation Department. The parcel of land
consisting of approximately .98 acre located on the west
side of Dodd. Road and just north of Golden Meadow Road is
now a vacant lot. We have been given notice that a Public
Hearing is scheduled for March 24, 1987 for consideration
of an application submitted by Dunn Real Estate for this
parcel of land.
We would propose that the above-described vacant lot be
utilized for a community park. Our development currently
lacks a park and recreation area for the many children in
our neighborhood. The map issued by the City of Eagan for
calendar year 1987 locates the forty existing park sites
in the city. According to this map, there are three parks
x' within one mile of Overview Estates. Of these three #32
South Oaks and #33 Lakeside are approximately one-half mile
from Overview Estates. These two parks are inaccessible
to children as they are on the east side of heavily traveled
Dodd Road. The remaining park #31 Trapp Farm is also
approximately one-half mile away. This park is only accessible
by way of Wilderness Run Road. Therefore, children would
have to travel along Dodd Road. It should be noted that
in computing the above distances, they were measured "as
the crow flies", not the actual distance which would. have
to be traveled for access.
In conclusion, we support the proposal for an area park in
our neighborhood and ask that you give this matter your sincere
consideration.
/12---
RTrMQ" RF.
AnnRFns
97- /7s�-73s3
I!
`!
L
45-x- ai l J--
-bct 33
*5-t,o-S63 S'
j?J, 4-5a-9-7-�
zlS-�l - ,-7"
if
��✓,.�,. 4- ,% M.A�1 e A -135 ooldtn
#Lea cf cv 4,fi -
76 oolk,
9-s'6-S`6s�s
f
43q,-2- R-P-�tP-z C,4 4 5: IB5
SIGNATURE
p r
1-11A
, , U0, 11" 0— v 0, W�,� I �ld -
ADDRESS
9,xs2. 5yLirr up -9-.
1/3Z)oI,- / /J-- � 912, F- 1 vx4c-, (I
�
e1:5-2 -�9 TO
If 52 --&/ 21
4�z-- '!S70-73
y5Y— u/Z
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Seven
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/FLOUR BIN IST ADDITION
J. Conditional Use Permit for a Drive-Thru Facility, Pylon Sign and
Beer Sales, Located in Lot 2, Block 1, Flour Bin 1st Addition --A
public hearing was held at the March 24, 1987, APC meeting to
consider an application submitted for a conditional use permit to
allow a drive-thru facility, pylon sign and 3.2 beer sales for a
Rocky Rococo Pizza restaurant. The application was submitted by the
Madison Pizza Corporation and is being recommended for approval by
the APC.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and
Engineering Departments' report, a copy is enclosed on pages_yly,_
through --L for your review.
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to those minutes
enclosed on page (s) _x/2,3
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
conditional use permit for Madison Pizza to provide a Rocky Rococo
Pizza restaurant, pylon sign, drive-through facility and 3.2 beer
sales on Lot 2, Block 1, Flour Bin 1st Addition.
//_5
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: MADISON PIZZA
LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, FLOUR BIN FIRST ADDITION:
EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a cond-
itional use permit for a drive-thru facility, pylon sign and 3.2
beer sales for a Rocky Rococo Pizza restaurant. The site, Lot 2,
Block 1, Flour Bin First Addition was previously approved for a
Burger King restaurant when recorded in June 1986. Flour Bin is
to the west and undeveloped LB land is to the east. Agriculturally
zoned single family lots are to the south.
SITE PLAN: This 1.4 acre lot is served by 'right in/ right, out
entry drives with a concrete median onto Cliff Road and by the full
access onto Nicols Road thru the Flour Bin site. With either one,_
the drive thru facility will not pass thru a parking area. Ample
stacking for eight cars is provided. The "middle" concrete median
is to be removed so that the parking stalls on the west side of the
-,f:=:>>s;•n'. building have easier access. All 39 stalls are ten feet wide, 33
are required for this 99 seat restaurant. Additional parking can
be provided on the southern portion of the site if building expan-
sion were to occur.. All setbacks meet Code requirements.
The trash enclosure has been moved closer to the building and must
meet the structural requirements of the Fire Marshall. A prelim-
inary landscape plan was also submitted and will need to be upgraded
to meet the current city standards. The applicant is in the process
of working with a local landscape architect to ensure proper plant
material selection and placement.
SIGNAGE: A pylon sign has been proposed in the northeastern corner
of the site, within the setback requirements. However, the proposed
contains 293 sq. ft. per side and is 40 feet tall. Code allows
125 sq. ft. per side and a 27 foot maximum height. The distance to
the Flour Bin sign is approximately 280 feet - 300 feet is the
typical spacing requirement for pylon signs on the same side of
the street. If approvedlstaff recommends the maximum height match
that of the -Flour -,Bin sign.-
114
w
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size,
capacity and depth is available and has been stubbed to this
development.
GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL: The property in its present
state is generally flat and covered with weeds. A majority of the
site was disturbed when the adjacent development to the west was
built.
The grading plan proposes to drain the site to two existing catch
basins and to one new catch basin in the center of the site. All
three -catch basins will be drained by an existing 15" storm sewer
line that connects to an existing 42" storm sewer along the east
propety line of the development. The 42" storm sewer line
eventually empties into Pond AP -9. The existing storm sewer
facilities that drain this development are adequate and they are
designed to serve this development.
Erosion/ sediment control practices designed to contain sediment on
site shall be installed and functional before any grading begins.
The developer shall be responsible for maintaining the erosion
control measures until the bitumious parking lots have been
constructed.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed development from
the north will be from Cliff Road, a four -lane divided roadway.
This access was constructed when the adjacent development to the
west was constructed. The Cliff Road access is a right -in and
right -out.
Access to the proposed development from the west will be through the
south end of the Flour Bin development to Nicols Road. Nicols Road
is currently being upgraded to a 44 ft. wide urban design roadway.
The Nicols Road access will allow traffic to enter the development
from all directions. Also, the Nicols Road/Cliff Road intersection
is signalized.
The two accesses that will serve this development, plus the adjacent
Flour Bin Restaurant access, should be adequate. The demand at
either driveway should be minimal.
In order to improve the circulation to this development, an existing
concrete median is proposed to be be removed and replaced with new
bituminous and striping. The other two concrete medians that
separate the incoming traffic from the outgoing traffic shall
remain. The concrete median that will be removed will allow the
incoming traffic from Cliff Road to turn into the proposed parking
areas along the north and west side of the proposed Ricky Rococo
Restaurant.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAYS/PERMITS: All appropriate utility easements
shall be provided in accordance with City standards prior to isuance
of a building permit.
The final layout plan should be submitted to the Dakota County
Highway Department to allow them to review the proposed improvements
along Cliff Road. //7
CONDITIONS:
1. The pylon sign shall contain a maximum 125 sq. ft. per side
and be no taller than the Flour Bin sign.
2. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted prior to the build-
ing permit application. A financial guarantee shall be included
and not released until after 1 year from the installation date.
/a
1
- ♦IM100 alOiO as a -x-. �7 a1Ma.win'xwal LY61 •CI TI►1' .L.f. ,OZ •.1 'TADS.
xmawm 'ul ,a+ou•.aun ....w•Ico.•..c,
d l'3 d13- NVId lfandO13AM = Ki
��•aY./nn
w. .,.. , laQYaa.i . ��M 10•Ta •L•lai 1».YIM . 4. L11.. Aal f.(¢, n at• �' � O
fY7w9M3 9MlRC110�
SNO{SIA3a '0l1 a9NIa33N19N37LLSIHH08VW � —
Yy C
II
I , -
_ ,
1'I 3a2gE? A-
�if
.w` W Z e7C7
Y ...>cr
Z w.
I , •.... rar. I �� O H-.! Ac Q �ei:@e Q ago
i
1 N
A'r ie
rl I'
8 I Y 6•: ' / 1' i
LU
YI
g
R:
�.Y �( i=: •o
Iri V fjA e3. � ,� . p•� I •\.\1
I K W» �• l T
YII ��4 _ IOW =1; �•'
I Ei li
4Yj.
sl I :mc va-.I
Mr
gem
� I Y9 Y� �'-.. � '�tiaw• �� I.'
1 { e• I I 1
I
r cadoa N 'Hb'S'�
—�-1--- ---- W
JLLI
--- �_ o
R
h
17=0"
/1'- 3d
CEMlr � In CE CCR.,
(Z� It' x IZ'x 395w 5Q.
'WR/ / To SE oXFo"
KoWm
+/0'
IW Oz IT O MAIN PY•L(i! 1 `iIUk)
FACE 17ECDS-kZ10N
Ah liFerlIPIEV
— ASC' LA -C7r- "A" EXTv-IJ'i101a CM,
ACRYLIC, FPALE4-) CA61NET 19 IIV"
PL -F -P 4.r TO VE OU -MV 0-OWA1
OV70WT CF-KTAQ.
Fm -Ey /,R,s 3/ib• AGRzf LIC WITH
I" PILLOW 41 IV' EHVWlMC-,
'APIC' TYPE I EX'UNTION 10" PEE -IN
CABINET TO 2•E OXF0V0 vPDWI.I/WITI �.-j
111 FLAT LEXAr1 FACOy /(5) LINF`r �Wwo**s
OF W SLIP -IN REAPU-"APP
—� t4AWLE
. I3/�'I PLATE y�c.
f
Z It
f ELECTPJCAL Ua. HNIM I.P. 7.7.fi-ANIS.
tiEADFr•"
—
W 1TH 14 ) 4,-0' A 1?/4' AIJ(FIOV_
30LT6i VE& HOLf-
IELEUMMNL CONVU11Ab, rEQ.
f ELECTPJCAL Ua. HNIM I.P. 7.7.fi-ANIS.
tiEADFr•"
a
t------- -
CT I
APC Minutes
March 24, 1987
3. Appropriate common side and rear lot line easements shall be
dedicated for Dodd Road.
4. A 50 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd
Road.
5. This lot shall be subject to a parks dedication fee.
6. All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on
the final quantities contained in the final plat and in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
All voted yea. The Commission directed staff to advise the
Advisory Park Commission of the neighbor's request.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - MADISON PIZZA
LOT 2, BLOCK 1, FLOUR BIN FIRST ADDITION
Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing in regard to the
application of Madison Pizza requesting conditional use permits for
a drive-through facility, pylon sign and 3.2 beer sales for a Rocky
Rococo Pizza Restaurant on Lot 2, Block 1, Flour Bin First Addition.
City Planner Runkle indicated that the proposal complied with the
previously anticipated use for a Burger King restaurant. The main
issue of concern was the request for a 293 square foot pylon sign.
Mr. Dan Rooney appeared on behalf of Madison Pizza and indicated
that the applicant found the staff conditions acceptable, including
the limitation of 125 square feet of signage for the pylon sign.
Mr. Linkert of 4640 Nicols Road, appeared and expressed his
belief that a fence was to have been constructed along the back side
of this property to allow some privacy for his single family home.
Mr. Runkle indicated he would review the conditions of the original
plat prior to the next City Council meeting.
Mr. Runkle indicated that the proposed sign was 280 feet from
the existing Flour Bin sign. Harrison moved, Krisnik seconded the
motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for
drive-through facility and 3.2 beer sales, subject to the condition
that a revised landscape plan shall be submitted prior to the
building permit application. The financial guarantee shall be
included and not released until one year from the installation date.
Staff shall.review the requirement for a fence, and enforce if such
a requirement exists. All voted in favor.
Harrison moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign to contain a
maximum of 125 square feet per side of signage and no taller than
the Flour Bin sign. All voted yes except McCrea who voted nay, on
the basis that the sign should meet code spacing requirements.
t z-3
,i
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Eight
WAIVER OF PLAT/KILLDEER ADDITION
K. Waiver of Plat in Order to Split Lot 4, Block 1, of the Killdeer
Addition for Separate Ownership in an NB District --A public
hearing was held on March 24 at the APC meeting to consider an
application submitted by Joyce and Rueben Miessner requesting a
waiver of plat in order to split Lot 4, Block 1, of the Killdeer
Addition for separate ownership. The APC is recommending
approval of the lot split.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
and Engineering Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages
41� through_13L. For a copy of the AFC minutes on this item,
refer to pages ^/33 through 13 .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat for Joyce and Rueben Miessner, referred to as a
lot split for Lot 4, Block 1, Killdeer Addition.
F
CITY OF EAGAN
-SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: JOYCE AND RUEBEN MEISSNER
LOCATION: LOT 4, BLOCK 1, KILLDEER ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 10, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver
of Plat in order to split Lot 4, Block 1, of the Killdeer Addition
for seperate ownership. This(NB)Neighborhood Business zoned lot is
located along the east side of Hwy. 149 just south -of Hwy. 55.
COMMENTS: Lots 4 and 5 contain 59,480 sq. ft. and 33,780 sq. ft.
respectively. The division of Lot 4 will create 2 parcels; A) 42,830
square feet and B) 16,650 square feet. '.Currently there is a single
family home owned by the Meissner's sons on proposed Parcel "B". The
new lot line will not effect setback requirements in any way. That
house will remain a non conforming use within a NB district. Lot 5
to the south contains a T.V. repair shop operated by the Meissner's
sons. The lot to the north is the recently improved Skelly Service
'=,;';;.;, Station. A single access for parcels A, B, and Lot 5 will be prov-
ided from Hwy. 149.
GRADING/DRAINAGE: Parcel A in its present state is lowerthanthe '.�.
surrounding developed properties.. The site contains a dense grass is
cover with numerous 1" - 2" trees.
The drainage ditch along the east side of S.T.H. 149 drains to the
low area on Parcel A. The high point on the ditch system to the
south is at Chapel Lane. The south half of the Texaco Gas Station
on the north side of Parcel A also drains to the low area on Parcel
A. Currently,,the storm water runoff from the highway ditch drains
across Parcel A and then to the north across the residential
properties to the Highway 55 frontage road ditch system.
If Parcel A develops, the lot will need to be filled to around
elevation 864, which will match the elevations of the surrounding
properties. Also, it is strongly recommended that a soils
investigation study be completed to determine the amount of organic
material that will have to be removed prior to the filling of the
lot.
If Parcel A develops, the natural drainage that crosses through this
lot must be allowed to continue. The storm water runoff from the
drainage ditch along S.T.H. 149 should be intercepted by a gravity
storm sewer system that would convey the runoff from the ditch along
S.T.H. 149 to the north and to the east and connect to the existing
storm sewer system at Joyce Court and Highway 55. The new storm
sewer system should be designed to convey approximately 16 c.f.s. as
it crosses Parcel A.
If Parcel A is improved, the developer shall submit a detailed
grading, drainage, and erosion control plan to the City for their
review.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service is available to Parcel A from the
existing 9" V.C.P. sanitary sewer line that flows northerly through
the east side of the property. If Parcel A develops, then the new
development would have to connect directly to the existing 9" line.
There are no service stubs provided to the proposed Parcel A.
A new water service will have to be installed to provide service to
the newly created lot (Parcel A). The new water service should
connect directly to the existing 8" water main on the east side of
the S.T.H. 149. There is presently an existing water service for
the existing house on Parcel B.
Depending on the location of the existing water service for Parcel B
in relationship to the proposed development on Parcel A, the water
service line might have to be relocated.
If Parcel A develops and the lot is filled, then the existing
sanitary sewer manhole shall be reconstructed to accommodate the new
grade. Also, if fill is added over the existing 9" sanitary sewer,
then the City would need to evaluate if the additional loading on
the clay pipe would be acceptable.
A detailed sanitary sewer and water service layout shall be
submitted to the City for their review when Parcel A develops.
STREETS/DRIVEWAYS/ACCESS: 'The proposed Parcel A can be adequately
served with street access from S.T.H. 149, along the west property
line of the parcel. S.T.H: 149 is a two-lane rural section roadway
under the jurisdiction of MnDot. At this time, there has not been a
schedule established for upgrading S.T.H. 149 to a four -lane urban
roadway with storm sewer.
S.T.H. 149 is a controlled access roadway in this area according to
Mr. Don Fashant of the Permit Section of Mn Dot. Therefore, no new
accesses will be permitted onto S.T.H. 149.- Parcel A will have to
use the existing access that connects to S.T.H. 149 at the south
property line of Lot 4 of Block 1 of the Killdeer Addition.
Therefore, it shall be a condition of this report that restricted.
access control shall be dedicated across the entire frontage of
Parcels A and B of Lot 4 and Lot 5 allowing only a singular driveway
access at its present location to be shared by all three parcels.
The existing common driveway opening shall be upgraded to a 32 ft.
wide entrance with 30 ft. turning radii.
�2�
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Easements shall be dedicated
across Parcel A for the sanitary sewer and water services for Parcel
B.
A maintenance agreement shall be executed providing for the common
use of the existing driveway between Parcels A and B of Lot 4 and
Lot 5.
Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated to
accommodate the future storm sewer system from the drainage ditch
along S.T.H. 149 to the north end of the storm sewer system.
Sufficient right-of-way has been dedicated for S.T.H. 149.
If Parcel A develops, then a preliminary layout plan should be
submitted to MnDot as soon as possible to allow them to review the
proposed improvements and provide comments.
ASSESSMENTS: Lot 4, Block 1, Killdeer Addition was previously
assessed as follows:
Project # _Type Usage
49 Sanitary Sewer Trunk - -�
49 Water Lateral S.F.
49 Water Area C/I
182 Storm Sewer Trunk C/I
There are presently no pending assessments.
Proposed assessments:
Project # Usage Description Rate Quantity
49 C/I * Water Lateral Benefit $8.08/F.F. 215.71 F.F.
-*.T.H. 49 C/I Street 92.76/F.F. 215.71 F.F.
Assessment
$1,743
20,009
Total $21,752
* The original assessment was not at a lateral benefit rate, however, it is part
of the trunk system. Therefore, the proposed assessment is at the upgrade rate.
P-7
CONDITIONS: KILLDEER ADDITION
1. All applicable Code requirements shall be adhered to.
2. A soils investigation report shallbe prepared to verify
existing soil conditions prior to construction on Parcel A.
3. Prior to development on Parcel A, adequate storm sewer shall be
constructed. Storm sewer construction shall be subject to
approval by MnDot as well as the City of Eagan.
4. Sanitary sewer and water service easements shall be provided
across Parcel A to serve Parcel B.
5. The developer of Parcel A shall submit an appropriate grading,
drainage and erosion control plan prior to improvement.
6. Restricted access control shall be dedicated across the entire
frontage of Lots 4 and 5.
7. A 50ft.x 50 ft. driveway easement shall be provided for
access off S.T.H. 149.
8. As a condition of commercial development on Parcel A, the
existing drive which serves the two existing houses shall be
upgraded to a 28 ft. wide bituminous roadway with concrete curb
and gutter.
9. The existing common driveway opening shall be upgraded to a 32
ft. wide entrance with 30 ft. radii.
10. Appropriate drainage and utility easements to accommodate
future storm sewer.
ll.All NB building and parking setbacks shall be maintained for
parcel "A" when developed.
Proposed waiver of platting for:
y1 Rev. Reuben F. Meissner
�\\ 384.88 S 89°53' 23"E
294.88 0.0
90 -Mg.
90.00
r -- SANITARY SEwa 1
w EASEMENT
rt \I DOC. NQ spa
O ��
¢��V 4 w I g, 1
;
0
0 172.25 I I I- I
�By6'^� ��7_2 5 1.30 S89°53' 23 E
-Pr\ ac°rosde utility easement
Q� Proposed cross access easement
A utility easement will be provided for the house
on Parcel B along the route of the existing line
to the sanitary sewer easement on Parcel A.
*► WATER LATERAL UPGRADE 215.71'
PROPOSED DESCRIPTION PARCEL A
Lot 4, Block I., KILLDEER ADDITION, according to -the recorded plat thereof, Dakota
County, Minnesota, Except the East 90.00 feet thereof. Also except the South
15.00 feet of said Lot 4, lying west of the East 90.00 feet.
PROPOSED DESCRIPTION PACEL B
The East 90.00 feet of Lot 4 and the South 15.00 feet of said Lot 4 lying west
of the East 90.00 feet thereof. All in Block 1, KILLDEER ADDITION, according to
the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota.
13
12
57.4 / 8,5.0 \�I
L 18 43.3/7Q.0
16u;......._ 1 \
_ r
r_c,;;ArvUacE CuTEn
{�\\. 55.8/800
7/78:0 „ 57~§
53. 82.071.2\f.9 O 12 •,8
16 $ i_O 45
16 nIC,IROA 14'
12 16 60.x/82.0
1 EA( Ni A' � ? --u rT
�i2
56 op/8?0
�
1 I
51.2/ 760 67.5/91.0 67.0(Q9. �•
, 7�7
�
49.7/74.0.: � '-----_. s -
1
t `. "(8
,
r\,
51 ,52.3177.Q 1. -
i
- �\ .... —
PARK w
f 49I ' 4 16n L7 \\ ` 24' LI _-_ )l Tri DEENY .4
18"
112"
�12 ° -/- IIt
,71hiY1 Ta . 8 65 51.4/72-0 \ 58 _ _•_}
�
4-
16" 6 56.4/76.0
Za/ss.o�
61.5/80.0 i 676/86.0 49.6/66.07.5/43-0 20"- ----- -- j
GD I8" ' 18" I 20 64 2d 63 24" Q6J2 _241 -GOPHEF1 EAGA.*g
67 66 8° 24' 60. PARK
TU`t:lAR �53.6/p2.0 sl ��eggTT 6 ;ILLS 48.9/66.0•
10 M.G.
;Cu11lCN LVESCOTT ROUND STORAGE \\
CARRIAGE I - H.W.L. 1059
18° I HILLS'.GREN
--
COURSE II G;;RDEN I LQTS 'CAGE
`� K�7F
city of eagan
MLE�
PUBLIC
WORKS
co
CY
-�� DEPARTME
MEISSNER PROPERTY
SUBJECT PARCEL
WATER
MASTER PLAN
I '7-..,-
0 j
FIG. #3
approved - standard
plate #: -
APC Minutes
March 24, 1987
WAIVER OF PLAT - LOT 4, BLOCK 1, KILLDEER ADDITION
JOYCE & RUEBEN MEISSNER
The public hearing in regard to the application of Joyce and
Rueben Meissner for waiver of plat in order to split Lot 4, Block 1,
Killdeer Addition, was then convened by Chairman Hall. Mr. Runkle
described the proposal which consisted of a Neighborhood Business
zoned lot located on the east side of Highway #149 just south of
Highway #55. The request was to allow the development of the front
portion of the lot while the rear portion would obtain access for a
single family home. Mr. Runkle indicated that the City would hold
the waiver of plat resolution until development did occur and all
conditions were complied with.
Mr. Mike Wills, part owner of the proposed single family lot,
and son of Joyce Meissner, was present to respond to questions. It
was noted that a variance from the 50 foot public street access
requirement was necessary, and that a 15 foot easement was necessary
from the lot adjacent to the south, which contained a T.V. Repair
business also operated by the Wills.
Hall moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the waiver of plat with variance for street frontage, subject to
the following conditions:
1. All applicable code requirements shall be adhered to.
2. A soil investigation report shall be prepared to verify
existing soil conditions prior to construction on Parcel A.
3. Prior to approval of the waiver of plat,, adequate storm
sewer shall be constructed. Storm sewer construction shall be
subject to approval by MnDOT as well as the City of Eagan.
4. Sanitary sewer and service easements shall be provided
across Parcel A to serve Parcel B.
5. The developer of Parcel A shall submit an appropriate
grading, drainage and erosion control plan prior to improvement.
6. Restricted access control shall be dedicated across the
entire frontage of Lots 4 and 5.
7. A 50 foot by 50 foot driveway easement shall be provided for
access off S.T.H. #149.
8. Prior to the approval of the waiver of plat, the existing
driveway which serves the two existing houses shall be upgraded to a
28 foot wide bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter.
2
5
APC Minutes
March 24, 1987
9. The existing common driveway opening shall be upgraded to a
32 foot wide entrance with 30 feet radii.
10. Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall
accommodate future storm sewer.
11. All NB building and parking setbacks shall be maintained
for Parcel A when developed.
12. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining a 15 foot
driveway easement from Lot 5 to the south.
All voted yes.
MUELLER SCHOOL - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing in regard to the
application of Independent School District #196 for rezoning of
28.43 acres to Public Facilities Park designation, and a preliminary
plat for an elementary school located on the north side of Wescott
Road, east of Lexington Avenue, in the southeast quarter of Section
14. Dale Runkle indicated that the Land Use Map had designated the
area as P/E (Parks & Elementary) and therefore, a Comprehensive
Guide Amendment was not necessary.
Mr. Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation, was present to
respond to any questions in regard to the park area use. There was
no one present from the public. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the
motion to recommend approval of the rezoning from A (Agricultural)
to PF (Public Facilities). All voted yes.
Harrison moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following
conditions:
1. All standards plat conditions shall apply.
2. All land swaps between the City and School District shall be
completed prior to final plat.
3. All necessary ponding easements shall be provided to the H'4L
as outlined above.
4. Utility easements necessary to extend storm sewers from the
proposed Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Addition shall be provided.
5. The required permit from the DNR shall be secured prior to
work on Pond JP -32.
6. Storm sewer constructed across the Williams Pipeline shall
be coordinated with Williams Pipeline Company.
/3�
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Nine
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/WESCOTT SCHOOL SITE
L. Rezoning for Mueller School Site (ISD #196) of 28.43 Acres to
a Public Facility Park Designation, a Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment and a Preliminary Plat for an Elementary School Located
on Wescott Road --A public hearing was held by the APC at their
regular meeting held on March 24 to consider two (2) applications
submitted by Independent School District #196 requesting a
rezoning of 28.43 acres from agricultural to public facility and
a preliminary plat for the Mueller School Addition. The
comprehensive guide plan redesignated the side as parks for parks
and elementary, therefore, no comp guide plan amendment will be
required. The APC is recommending approval.
For additional information on this item, refer to a report
prepared by the Planning and Engineering Departments found on
pages Zvi through 14tZ.-.
For additional information and action that was taken by t e APC,
refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s) / 3 •! /
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1)
rezoning of 28.43 acres from A to PF and 2) the preliminary plat
entitled Mueller School.
/35
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT (MUELLER SCHOOL)
APPLICANT: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196
LOCATION: SE4 SECTION 14
EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING
APPLICATIONS: Two seperate applications have been submitted by
Independent School District 196 requesting a rezoning of 28.43 A
(Agricultural) acres to a PF (Public Facilities) district and a pre-
liminary plat for the Mueller School Addition. The November 1986
Land Use Map designates this area P/E (Parks & Elementary), therefore
no Amendment will be necessary. The site is located east of the
Greensboro Addition, west and south of the Sunrise Hills Addition
and abutts Wescott Road.on the south.
CODE COMPLIANCE / SITE PLANNING: This site is dominated by 3 large
ponding areas and a dense hardwood zone in the northwestern -most
portion of the proposed .park. The Williams Brothers Pipeline Ease-
ment crosses through that area and will not be affected by this plat.
The City will enter a joint usage agreement to develop the 28.43
acres. The City will own 10 acres and ISD 196 18.43 acres. Basically,
the responsibility of the City will be for the design, construction,
coordination, and maintenance of the recreation areas. ISD 196 will
have jurisdiction of the entire property during the regular school
year and during summer school.sessions. They will also pay for.their
share of customary recreational facilities. -
A land exchange between the developers of Sunrise Hills and the
school district will provide more athletic field area in exchange
for need single family lots in exchange for needed single family lot
areas. This agreement will be finalized prior to the final plat
submission. (See Exhibit)
A looped vehicular access from Wescott will serve this site. Ped-
estrian Easements connecting to the Greensboro and Sunrise Hills
Additions -will be provided. A secondary bus loading/ handicapped
parking area is on the south side of the school. The building foot-
print is almost identical to Deerwood School._ Only small detailing
changes will occur. That school was built to accomodate approximately
700 students in grades K-5. It is anticipated that this school will
open in the -fall -of 1988. -
There will be 104 parking stalls at a nine foot width provided - 25
more than the Deerwood site and should be sufficient for potential
joint usage. The City's Park Planner will provide the landscape plan
for the entire site. /?J!o
4a _
WESCOTT ROAD
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
GRADING/DRAINAGE: The site incorporates rolling topography and 4 wetlands.
The southerly and easterly portion of the site drains into Pond JP -31 and the
pond directly abutting Wescott Road. The pond abutting Wescott Road is not
designated as a pond in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan, however, it is in-
tended to be preserved as a pond with this development and will receive storm
water runoff from the adjacent parking lots. Therefore, this pond will be in-
corporated into the Eagan Storm Sewer System and pond easement will have to be
provided to the HWL. The controlled outlet for this pond _will be provided by
proposed storm sewers constructed in Wescott Road. Pond JP -31 located north-
easterly of the previously mentioned pond will receive runoff from the adja-
cent parking lot, the ballfields located to the north, and the proposed Sun-
rise Hills and Woodland Addition. The controlled outlet for this pond will be
provided by proposed storm sewers in Wescott Road and will be maintained lower '
than the pond abutting Wescott Road. Pond easement will have . rn ha, nrn.,y r�o,a
to the HWL in addition to those utility easements necessary to extend storm
sewers from the proposed Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Addition. The northwest-
erly part of the site drains into a pond located in the northerly and central
part of the site. This pond will drain northwesterly by storm sewer required
as part of this development to Pond JP -32 which the storm sewer outlet will be
provided as part of the Greensboro 2nd Addition. Pond easement for Pond JP -32
will be required to the HWL. Pond JP -32 is a wetland protected by the Depart-
ment of Natural Resources and will require a permit to work below the normal
ordinary high water level. - -
/91
The grading of the site provides for gradual slopes and is in accordance
with City of Eagan standards. Williams Pipeline does cross the site in the
northwest corner but no grading is proposed in this area. However, storm
sewer providing the outlet for the pond located in the northerly central part
of the site to Pond JP -32 will cross the pipeline. Therefore, its construc-
tion must be coordinated with Williams Pipeline Co.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main service will be provided with the
proposed upgrading of Wescott Road. It is recommended the water main in the
school site be looped through the trailway easement provided as part of
Greensboro 2nd Addition and connect to the proposed water main in Greensboro
2nd Addition.
STREETS: This site will be served by Wescott Road. Wescott Road is presently
proposed to be upgraded in 1987 to a 52' width with concrete sidewalk on the
north side and an 8' wide bituminous trail on the south. The site will be
served by -a looped driveway around the pond abutting Wescott Road.
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate a 50' half
tiy_Y right-of-way for Wescott Road. This development shall also provide the neces-
sary pond and utility easements.
This development shall acquire all regulating agency permits within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
/0 ,
,y
EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES: This development shall adhere to the
erosion/ sediment control measures in accordance with the City of Eagan's
Erosion Control Manual and the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation
District (SWCD) recommendations.
ASSESSMENTS: The assessment records indicate there are no pending assessments
against the property and the following levied assessments:
Project # Tyne Usaae
58 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Single -Family
433 Storm Sewer Trunk* Single -Family
Only a portion of the property was assessed (see exhibits).
As a condition of final platting, the City will require this development
to be responsible for the following assessments:
Description Usage Rate Quantity Assessment
Water Area P.F. $1,250/Ac. 28.43 Ac. $ 35,538
Storm Sewer Upgrade P.F. .026/S.F. 247,424 S.F. 6,433
Wescott Road P.F. 92.76/F.F. 862.06 F.F. 79,965
Wescott Road Trail P.F. 12.40/F.F. 862.06 F.F. 10,690
Storm Sewer Additional P.F. .079/S.F. 990,987 S.F. 78,288
Assessment
TOTAL ASSESSMENTS: $210,914
The above assessments are proposed; however, they may be levied as part
of a public improvement project. All areas shown are "gross areas". There
have been no deductions made for ponding areas.
/37
,
r.
CONDITIONS:
1. All standard plat conditions shall apply.
2. All land swaps between City and School District shall be completed prior
to final plat.
3. All necessary ponding easements shall be provided to the HWL as outlined
above.
4. Utility easements necessary to extend storm sewers from the proposed
Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Addition shall be provided.
5. The required permit from the DNR shall be secured prior to work on Pond
JP -32.
6. Storm sewer constructed across the Williams Pipeline shall be coordinated
with Williams Pipeline Company.
7. This development shall dedicate a 50 -foot, half right-of-way for Wescott
Road.
8. Water main looping as recommended shall be provided.
9. This development shall adhere to erosion/sediment control measures as
outlined in Exhibit A.
Wi
9' width parking stalls shall be approved.
A detailed landscape plan shall be a part of the final plat
package. If a phasing plan is"used, all parking and service
areas for the building shall have phase I status.
14
r:
r
.�, s ,� ,,—; s
+� �, ,_ � ,
APC Minutes
March 24, 1987
9. The existing common driveway opening shall be upgraded to a
32 foot wide entrance with 30 feet radii.
10. Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall
accommodate future storm sewer.
11. All NB building and parking setbacks shall be maintained
for Parcel A when developed.
12. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining a 15 foot
driveway easement from Lot 5 to the south.
All voted yes.
MUELLER SCHOOL - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing in regard to the
application of Independent School District #196 for rezoning of
28.43 acres to Public Facilities Park designation, and a preliminary
plat for an elementary school located on the north side of Wescott
Road, east of Lexington Avenue, in the southeast quarter of Section
14. Dale Runkle indicated that the Land Use Map had designated the
area as P/E (Parks & Elementary) and therefore, a Comprehensive
Guide Amendment was not necessary.
Mr. Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation, was present to
respond to any questions in regard to the park area use. There was
no one present from the public. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the
motion to recommend approval of the rezoning from A (Agricultural)
to PF (Public Facilities). All voted yes.
Harrison moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following
conditions:
1. All standards plat conditions shall apply.
2. All land swaps between the City and School District shall be
completed prior to final plat.
3. All necessary ponding easements shall be provided to the HWL
as outlined above.
4. Utility easements necessary to extend storm sewers from the
proposed Sunrise Hills and Woodlands Addition shall be provided.
5. The required permit from the DNR shall be secured prior to
work on Pond JP -32.
6. Storm sewer constructed across the Williams Pipeline shall
be coordinated with Williams Pipeline Company.
103
i
APC Minutes
March 24, 1987
7. This development shall dedicate a 50 foot, half right-of-way
for Wescott Road.
8. Water main looping as recommended shall be provided.
9. This development shall adhere to erosion/sediment control
measures as outlined in Exhibit "A".
10. A detailed landscape plan shall be a part of the final
package. If a phasing plan is used, all parking and service areas
for the building shall have phase I status.
Member McCrea noted that she would vote for the preliminary
plat, in spite of the 9 foot parking spaces. All voted yea.
SAFARI AT EAGAN - REPLAT TO THOMAS LAKE CENTER
The next public hearing convened by Chairman Hall was upon the
request of Linvill Properties, Inc. for a replat of Safari at Eagan
consisting of 6 lots on 10.7 acres with Lot 1 containing a 41,000
square foot strip center. Additional lots were proposed for
restaurant or small retail areas. Mr. Runkle gave a history of
several previous preliminary plats that had preceded this
preliminary plat. He also indicated that the County had now
eliminated theright-in right -out access on Cliff Road. Mr. Ralph
Linvill, partner with Mark Reilly, was present, in addition to the
architect J. D. McRae, and also a civil engineer and traffic
engineer. Mr. McRae presented elevation plans, descriptions of the
proposed colors, building materials and berming.
Sonja Tollefson was present and expressed concern regarding the
number of retail sites along Cliff Road. Mr. Myron Smith, a single
family owner on the south side of Cliff Road expressed concern
regarding the sign size, heights and locations. Mr. Ed Dunn
requested information as to the use of the property on the north
side of Safari Lane. Mr. Linvill indicated that they had no
interest in buying additional property. In response to member
McCrea's questions, the applicant through Mr. Lou Stockville, a real
estate agent, indicated that it had several interested tenants,
although had signed none at this time. It was indicated that
construction would start in May and the center would be open in
November. . The developer indicated that the mechanical units were
proposed to be located on the tops of the building, but not visible,
due to the proposed facade. Member Trygg questioned the access on
Thomas Lake Road, which Mr. Colbert said the staff had maximized as
to the distance between Cliff 'Road and the access, without
increasing the entrance grade to a point that was safe.
7
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REPLAY (THOMAS LAKE CENTER)
APPLICANT: LINVILL PROPERTIES, INC.
LOCATION: LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 1, SAFARI AT EAGAN
EXISTING ZONING: CSC WITHIN BLACKHAWK SOUTH PD
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 17, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting
a Preliminary Plat for the Thomas Lake Center. This replat of
the Safari at Eagan proposal consists of 6 lots on 10.7 acres
with lot 1 containing a 41,000 sq. ft. strip center. The original
proposal in 1981 was for an 83,000 sq. ft. mall type building.
That plan was revised in late 1986 to _3 lots with one being
a 42,000 sq. ft. strip center. The following is a breakdown
of each lot in the March 1987 proposal:
Lot 1
5.8 acres with an allowable building coverage of 65,000 sq. ft.
The building proposed is 42,000 sq. ft. Parking required 205;
.parking provided 216.
The service area is on the North side of the building. Since
the building has frontage on all four sides, a common sign band
area should be required to eliminate a loading dock image on
the North side. The trash enclosures -have been incorporated
into the building itself. The exterior finish will be brick
and potentially concrete block on. the lower half of the North
side, a stucco sign band area, and aluminum store front area.
Gabled reflective glass canopies create interest in the roof
line area. The fan units are not shown in the elevations and
therefore, are assumed to not be visible.
Lot 2
A 1 acre lot designated for 93 seat restaurant. Parking for
31 required; 31 provided. -
Lot 3
A 1.1 acre lot for a restaurant or retail use. The parking/building
coverage shown for either use would meet code requirements.
47
REPLAT (THOMAS LAKE CENTER) - Page 2
Lot 4
If developed for= use other than parking, there will need to be
proof that there will not be a shortage of spaces for the strip
building.
Lot 5
A 1 acre lot for retail/restaurant use; parking requirements
have been met.
Lot 6
A 9 acre lot for a 126 seat restaurant or 3,900 sq. ft. retail
use building; parking requirements have been met.
COMMENTS: The landscape plan with this submission reflects all
City standards and is an excellent example of perimeter parking
lot screening. This plan has overall consistency and from a
design standpoint provides year round color and interest.
Three pylon signs are being requested. The major sign 'along
Cliff Road is 32 feet tall and contains 125 sq. ft. of signage
area. If this center is determined to be a 'major complex' under
the terms of the Sign Ordinance, the size shall be determined
by the Council.
The other signs are 16 feet tall with 40 sq. ft. of signage area
at the Safari Boulevard and Thomas Lake entrances. Those signs
are scaled down visions of the major sign. The consistency will
add to the aesthetics of the site.
r4?
GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL: The property in its present
state generally drains from south to north. The site is covered
with dense grasses and there are a few trees surrounding the old
farmhouse.
The grading plan proposes a maximum cut of 19 ft. in the center of
the development and a maximum fill of 11 ft. in the northeast corner
and 8 ft. in the southeast corner. The grading plan proposes to
level the site and maintain the drainage from south to north. The
drainage from the site will be handled by the existing storm sewer
system on Safari Boulevard that discharges to the north through an
existing 36" storm sewer and then to a drainage ditch that empties
into Pond BP -13. Pond BP -13 is drained by an existing 24" gravity
storm sewer line that discharges into Thomas Lake.
The existing storm sewer system that will serve this development is
of sufficient size and capacity to handle the storm water runoff
from this development plus the other areas that contribute to the
system. The low area in the northwest corner of Safari Boulevard
and Cliff Road will be developed as a ponding area and the outlet
for this pond is a part of the Safari Boulevard storm sewer system.
When Cliff road is upgraded, then the future storm sewer facilities
that will be required should empty into this .pond rather than
connect directly to the existing storm sewer line on Safari
Boulevard.
In regard to erosion control, the streets surrounding the proposed
development must be protected to prevent sediment movement into the
existing catch basins on Safari Boulevard and Thomas Lake Road.
Sediment can be retained on this site by revegetating the site in a
timely manner, by proper placement and maintenance of silt curtains
and by using temporary gravel construction entances of at least 50
ft. at ingress and egress points. Also, erosion and sediment
control practices designed to contain sediment on site shall be
installed and functional before any grading begins.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size,
capacity and depth is available to serve this development from
Thomas Lake Road and Safari Boulevard.
The developer's layout on the preliminary utility plan is
acceptable, however, staff would recommend an alternative layout
for the sanitary sewer. The developer proposed to connect to an
existing manhole on the 27" sanitary sewer on Thomas Lake Road,
however, this .sewer is almost 30 ft. deep and the connection to
the manhole would require an outside drop section. Adding an
outside drop section to an existing manhole is expensive plus the
contractor might encounter ground water problems. Also, the
contractor might have to close down Thomas Lake Road to make the
connection and the repair work involved with replacing Thomas
Lake Road to its original condition would be expensive.
The alternative layout for the sanitary sewer would be to connect to
the existing 8" sanitary sewer on Safari Boulevard. The alternative
layout would require an extra 300 ft. of 8" sanitary sewer, but the
total cost of the two alternatives might be similar.
10
W -
�n
The developer proposes to install sanitary sewer and water services
to Lot 4 of this development which is shown as a parking lot on the
site plan. In the future, if the use for Lot 4 was changed from a
parking lot to a building, then the parking requirements might not
be met for this development. The proposed temporary storm drainage
system from Cliff Road through this site needs some further study as
to final design to handle this problem.
The preliminary utility plan should be revised to show at least a 10
ft. horizontal separation from the water main to the sanitary sewer
and storm sewer lines that are parallel.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: This development will be adequately
served by the existing streets that currently surround this
development. Along the south side of the development is Cliff Road,
a two-lane rural design roadway that is controlled by the Dakota
County Highway Department. Along the east side of the development
is Thomas Lake Road, a 44 ft. wide urban design roadway that is on
the City's State Aid street system. Along the west and north sides
of this development is Safari Boulevard, a 44 ft. wide urban design
roadway installed for this development in 1981.
In the future, Cliff Road will be upgraded to a.four-lane roadway
with left -turn lanes. Also, a signed system will be installed at
Cliff Road and Thomas Lake Road when the traffic volumes warrant a
new signal system. Therefore, the County strongly recommends that
no accesses will be allowed onto Cliff Road between Thomas Lake Road
and Safari Boulevard/Beacon Hill Road.
The developer's site plan showed a driveway access onto Cliff road
310 ft. west of Thomas Lake Road. However, this access will not be
allowed. Staff recommends that a new access onto Safari Boulevard
be added at the east property line of Lot 6. The new access will
provide a driveway opening near the trunk loading area to keep
delivery trucks from driving through the parking lot areas.
At the City's request, the developer has submitted a traffic, access
and parking lot review report prepared by a traffic engineer. The
report determined that special site distance or alignment problems
were not apparent along Cliff Road or Thomas Lake Road. Also, the
entering and exiting traffic wil 1 have four opportunities to enter
or exit at the four driveways and the demand at any given driveway
should be minimal. The report states that the 504 parking spaces
provided will be adequate to serve this mixed use commercial
development. .The proposed access driveway grade is approximately
10% on the east side of this development which is too steep. Staff
recommends that the grading plan be revised so the driveway grade
does not exceed 4%.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Staff recommends this development
dedicate a 75 ft. half right-of-way for Cliff Road. Also, because
of the potential grading required to upgrade Cliff road, staff
recommends this development provide a 20 ft slope easement adjacent
the southerly boundary of this proposed development.
A 20 ft. utility easement shall be dedicated over the proposed 8"
sanitary sewer line. Also, a 20 ft. utility easement shall be
dedicated over the proposed 8"anitary sewer line. Also, a 20 ft.
10
utility easement shall be dedicated over the proposed " and 6" water
mains up to an including all the hydrants but not including the
service lines to the buildings. A 30 ft. wide combined utility
easement is required when the proposed water main and sanitary sewer
lines are parallel and 10 ft. apart.
No unusual permit requirements are anticipated beyond the normal
MPCA, MWCC and Department of Health permits for sanitary sewer and
water extensions. A revised preliminary layout plan should be
submitted to the Dakota County Highway Department as soon as
possible to allow them to review the proposed improvements along
Cliff Road and process the permit for work within County right-of-
way.
ASSESSMENTS: This property, will. be responsible for the following
assessments at the rate in effect at the time of final plat
approval. The rates listed below are 1987 rates and is calculated
as follows:
PROJ. # DESCRIPTION USAGE RATE QTY. ASSESSMENT
237
236
Cliff Rd. Upgrading
Cliff Rd. Trail
Water Main Lateral Benefit
Upgrade
Water Main Lateral Benefit
Cliff Rd.
Lateral Benefit Storm
Sewer Trunk
C/I
C/I
C/I
$82.37/ff 829.8/ff $68,351.0(
12.40/ff 829.8/ff 10,290.0(
8.08/ff 649.4/ff 5,267.0(
20.55/ff 829.8/ff 17,052.0(
10.39/ff 40 Lin. Ft. 416.0(
$101,356.(
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL: See attached letter dated March 12,
1987, from the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District
for requirements and recommendations.
lea
CONDITIONS:Thomas Lake Center
1) All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to
2) A review of -the parking situation for the strip center shall
be done before building on lot 4 occurs
3) A financial guarantee shall be submitted with the final land-
scape plan and not released until after one (1) year from
the installation date
4) This plat shall be responsible for trails along Cliff Road
and Thomas Lake Road
5) The pylon signs shall be approved as submitted. They must
be 10 feet within. the property line
6) This Plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks & Recreation
Commission for their recommendations
7) The fan units shall not be visable
8) The trash shall be incorporated within the building on Lot
1
9) All lots shall have site plan reviews by the Council prior
to building permit issuance
10) The sign band shall be uniform on all sides of the building
11) All signage is subject to the one time sign fee of 2.50/sq.
ft.
12) All of the perimeter landscaping shall be installed with
the first phase construction.
13) All drainage and ponding easements required by the City of
Eagan shall be dedicated on the final plat. A minimum 20'
easement shall be dedicated for all utilities not located
within public right-of-way. All other drainage and utility
easements shall be dedicated as required by staff as a part of
the final plat.
14) All permits required by local, County, Regional and State
agencies shall be acquired prior to final plat approval.
15) This development shall be responsible for all the additional
assessments required with this proposal as determined by the
rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
16) this development shall comply with all applicable standard
Engineering conditions.
a
t�
17) If public improvements are to be installed under City contract,
the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for installation
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
18) If public- improvements are installed privately, plans and
specifications for improvements must be prepared by a
registered engineer in accordance with City designed
guidelines.
19) All costs of internal public improvements within this
development shall be the sole responsibility of this
development.
20) A 75' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Cliff Road.
16!z
cc
W
W
CL U
} W
m Y
a a
Z J
W �
CC n
IL O
z W
4 =
0 ~
a O
w
H O
a z
z ¢ o
O Q o
a
U a
U)0 LZ
Y
LLJ Ucf) O
mw w
z_ ¢
J w
Q v r
W'0
> f-
f -
J j a
N O
U p
W
Q O
r ¢
(A O O
r Y U
O Q w
J O ¢
63
-iVIOSSNNIW 'NV9VS
_ s:ssnj NV'Id MISSaIwc o s 1 i
2IS,LNHO SJIV'I SYNOH,L Aa,YU19
!
f
OVOH 3Hr► SVV40RL
3
1
1
Hy
?
s=
I
X11111
M1111
d1ill
dill
411111111!111
!91(d
a
r
OVOH 3Hr► SVV40RL
3
W
<
w
z ti
1; p
z
0 7
w
>
cr
avou 3)4vl
Ah
0HI
-----------III �I
----------
a;
WN
v
•�lbiNNIW. A.IM rill VAllMVU. liVUYd --LU
sAepro�_.
SNOUNATIR ONIa llflO
gg, NAD gMVI SVWOHl
1 dauue�
I�
GI�•�
P• - .1 •
I—T]tlG
— F
1
7Y
c
=:
9
rr
1
I
4 3
!
l -
+
1
e
0
-
7
z=.
SLS
l
WN
A
SNOW
400-
128 51.7/67.0
—4
12, 118" F I §JkO4* 1
1 8
.i t -j- g�, ' 5 2.6 /.6 7. 0
'17'117 1? 4'] Ci
207 5 0"
M. G-"
--GROUNO AGE
STOFr-44.6/59.0
H.W. ')059 0
z
12
E -AI.rol 38.3/94.0
Flo 2 ol (�P)
j CAN-&
qf- CL'11!A N
PAR.K �j 160
21.8/31.0
A PUL- i0o c
:j
16 001100'88.5/ 82.8/9'4.0
100.0
JJ
-ro 0-65.0
4.4 /10 C/
m
A H12 12
159
16S .17CP 43.2/58.0
0 80.7/92.0 176-3/ 1020
Sao
- - - -------------------
IV/ 1870/98.01
A
J,
Z' 10), /
�jj [THOWS
158 C�-
116
17-
81.1/92.0 ' .-I . F
HEIG' tt
CHOO
8-1
-r Ez G., \PowrR UTILITY e-�'
NO T �"l RENT 66'
-f 93.5/104.0
156 157 9"/94.0 r4INIAS LAKE
PARK
"'m "UA
C11 16 9)
..44
6.0/ %s Ifi
C r
A
AFAR[
L
AT
E A
Q�2
-4
221 i JT 'b/74.0 (D(00 70.5/ 74D
F7-, 4, 1 2 M.G. GROUND STORAGE' 6:478
3000 G.P.M. BOOSTER
H
XL;. 1055
6iECLIF
PARKVIEW
ADDITION 11 16
L COURSEGOLF
w
X
DCS' ---
fel
nn
59.8/76.0
WIA BrA a 9
G'
Pi
r
68.0/82.0
12
35.5/50.(
Q�K�P 71-17
i1sVe"
540
it 1 �
1020
208
'A 20
THOMAS LAKE- CENTER
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG. -*3
city of eagan approved: standard
PUBLIC
plate #:
WORKS MASTER PLAN
10
DEPARTMENT
m
/5)
3NVI SVWOHI
g
T
�
3
12 '
cam_
N oZ
m N
CIS
,
oG
\
Q'
00
O
\
SO
\
m
1
02�
•_-
I
°E of
:II I
Q
II
I
I
I>
�-
I
`
r�
O
I
I
°ll
I
I
\I1 N
O �
3.E1.SF sO N
/ If 'A." 9
4
St
I
LL
LL
J
U
ji
Ju
j
ii
J
zc
i
D
J
CV08 3NVI SVNOHI
g
:?-r/
Ef a0 IV
co-
�;I C
co� " N
LL
LU
LU
LU
I �
m m p
'
1 OF
OFOF LU I a,
N ii; I O
�m
Q am
r �
; T
I I 102
I I
ll W op I
IO
A
n N
♦ ) I In \D
� ' M
OF
--- --- -, ---- CO OEz
00 001?
m�
< Q• N ' II p h
O V l O
\ •00 b rr'C.i Y oC vY2
3..00 .'2 Q0 N.—
`_; M I�lvvs
m
si
L
4
ad08 3NVI SdWOHI
R
adds
0
�1
MWE
LL
U—
J
U
L
F
r
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
1610 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454
MEMORANDCH TO: Mr. J. D. McRae
123 North Third Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota
FROM: Deane M. Wenger
& ton-Aschnan Associates, Inc.
1610 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota '
DATE: February 25, 1987
SUH7ECT': PROPOSED DEVEIDPM= SITE
DAKM CO= ROAD 32 AT nnIA.S = ROAD
EAGAN, MDWESOT_A
612-332-0421
The proposed site was viewed on February 23, 1987. The check was made to
determine whether special sight distance or alignment problems were
apparent. Our conclusion was that the problems did not exist.
• H91 I211.f',
In a development of this type, where the basic center is to be developed
then additions made, the total trip generation is scanewhat nebulous.
The values used to develop the preliminary trip generation are:
1. 45,000 square feet of retail space oriented toward convenience goods.
2. Office space to be provided on one .lot. The square footage would
likely be 8,000 to 10,000 square feet.
LE
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
Page 2
3. Four fast food sites of about 2,500 to 4,000 square feet.
The trip generation of a smaller commercial center is normally higher than
for a lamer center unless the smaller center is,to concentrate on specialty
stores.
Having a mix of fast food and other restaurants are quite desirable in terms
of both trip generation and parking accumulation. The principal idea is
that the individual uses in the mixed use development do not create peak
demands during the same hours.
Trip generation calculations are most pertinent for the P.M. peak hour.
This hour represents reasonably high trip generation from the site and
maxm= volumes on the adjacent arterial streets for a single hour.
Though 24 hour volumes are useful for factors such as pavement thickness,
they have no effect on peak hour capacity and, therefore, design and lane
Preliminary estimates of trip generation indicate this site might generate
the following numbers of trips per hour during the P.M. peak hour:
JW
r
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
Page 3
Table 1
P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation
Trip Rate Trips/ Trip Rate Trips/
Land Use Size In Hour Out Haar
Retail 42,000
Sq. Ft. 2.6
-s
109 2.0
84
Office 9,000
Sq. Ft. 0.2
3 2.0
18
Restaurant 30,000
Sq. Ft. 8.0
240 5.0
180
Total
352 VPH
282 VPH
Both the inbound and outbound trip volumes are relatively low for a
commercial development As a rule of thumb, one can compare the demand to a
rush hour lane capacity of about 500 vehicles per hour.
In this instance, the entering and exiting traffic will have four
opportunities to enter or exit four driveways. The demand for capacity at
any given driveway should be minimal.
A characteristic of trip generation to the type of retail development
proposed is that it attracts relatively short trips. Therefore, the trade
area is localized arra quite symetrical. This is a distinct advantage to the
handling of traffic.
The trips generated by the development must be added to the trip forecasts
and patterns of trip increases on both Lake Thomas Road and on Cliff Road.
At this junction, it is unlikely the intersection of the two would have to
163
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
Page 4
be signalized nor would Cliff Road east and west of the site have to be
widened to a four lane cross-section, except to provide for turn slots to
insure the safety of the dons.
ass
The parking standards for the City of Eagan have not been made available.
The following summarizes what we believe are minimum workable parking ratios
per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area.
The city may wish to have a higher ratio or a factor of safety. Similarly,
the developer may choose to provide higher ratios to enhance the
attractiveness of the center.
Nonetheless, we submit the minimum ratios listed can be documented for an
average or design data based on counts assembled for the Twin Cities
metropolitan area.
We have consistently found that in the past 10 years, the older standards
for trip generation and parking needs are excessively high.
F,
No one is interested in providing inadequate parking supply but conversely,
an excessive ratio only raises project costs or prevents the city from
attaining the density of development (arra, therefore, tax base) that can be
144
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
Page 5
justified. Rates that are too high harm the developer (city objectives
about as much as too low rates creating unworkability).
Table 2
Mi n i mtnn Recoamended parking Ratios .1
11
Parking Parking
Land Use Size (Sq. Ft.) Ratio/1,000 S. F. Req ire
Retail 42,000 5.0 210
Office 8,000 3.0 24
Restaurants 30,000 8.0 240
Total 474
The number of spaces proposed for the site totals 504. The developer is not
trying to minimize the number of spaces to be provided; especially when one
has not even considered the desirable mix of land uses which permits a
reduction in the number of parking spaces required.
Studies done by Barton-Aschman for the Urban Larxi Institute, indicate the
total number of parking spaces needed in a mixed land use development can be
14 to 25 percent lower than the aggregate for the individual uses. With the
proposed supply, the city has, in our opinion, a safety factor of about 20
percent.
An important factor is that the parking supplied is reasonably convenient or
desirable and not tucked into corners of the parking areas. In addition,
the office, retail and restaurant parking areas must be accessible
/'6-5--
e
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
(conveniently) to more than one use. Walking distance between differing
uses is also important.
V24121-• •e •.
The site has good access from the east and west V -1a CSAH 32 as well as to
the north on Take Thomas Road. It should be noted, however, that CSAH 32 to
the west has significantly higher volumes near Johnny Cake Ridge Road and
west of Galaxie Drive.
These sections are four lane. The
induced
traffic is
caused by the
convenient interchange access from Cedar
Avenue
(TH 7) and
the development
east of the interchange.
In 1984, which is the last year for which counts are available, the volumes
on CR 32 at Take 'Thomas Road were about 6,900 vehicles per day. This is at
the break point for which designers. should shift from a two to a four lane
section. The inclusion of another moderate sized center will not merit the
increase to the number of lanes required but may accelerate the need for the
widening. The volumes already indicate a need for widening to four lanes.
4
Take Thomas Road is not a critical street in terms of capacity needs; based
on observation. Limited access points to the arterial appear, however, to
be most appropriate. Capacity analyses can verify these conclusions.
7k /
MINNESOTA
SOIL AND WATER
March 12, 1987
DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
TO: Mike Foertsch
City of Eagan
FROM: Barb McCarthy
Dakota County SWCD
Farmington Professional Building
821 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Phone: (612) 463-8626
RE: Review of Preliminary Plat for Thomas Lake Center.
We would like to submit the following comments for our
review of the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan
for Thomas Lake Center, dated March 9, 1987.
INVENTORY OF SOIL RESOURCES
There are two areas on the proposed site where the Dakota
County Soil Survey indicates that wet soils occur. These
areas, identified on the enclosed Plan, generally have a
"perched" water table one ft. above to two ft. below the
existing ground surface during the months of November -May.
The developer should be aware of this soil condition during
the planning process. Perhaps the soil borings done on-site
identified this condition. Prior to fill being placed in
these areas, all unsuitable soil materials should be
excavated. All fills should be properly compacted.
INVENTORY OF WATER RESOURCES
No "wetlands" occur on this site. The site is proposed to
discharge stormwater north directly into Thomas Lake.
Because of the potential for significant sediment loadings
as this site is being developed, we recommend that a
properly designed sediment basin be constructed on the
northeast corner of the site (see discussion under GC -5 to
follow) .
147
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW
An incomplete erosion and sediment control (E & SC) plan was
submitted with the plat. The "General Criteria" and
"Checklist" for an erosion and sediment control plan should
be used in developing these plans, including a site plan and
accompanying narrative.
GC -1 and GC -2 Stabilization of Denuded Areas
The E & SC plan should address re -vegetation of the entire
site and not only on slopes greater the 4:1. The following
items should be addressed on the plan and in the narrative
section: the location of vegetative measures and seeding
and mulching specifications (types, seeding date, species,
rate of application, seed placement, fertilizer
requirements, method of anchoring mulch). We recommend that
the site be re -vegetated within 1-2 days after rough
grading. Please include a proposed schedule for
blacktopping roads and parking areas.
GC -3 Protection of Adjacent Property,_
The streets surrounding the proposed development must be
protected to prevent sediment movement into catch basins and
into Thomas Lake. Sediment can be retained on this site by
"benching" more lots, by re -vegetating the site in a timely
manner, by the proper placement and maintenance of silt
curtains, by using temporary gravel construction entrances
at ingress and egress points, and by using a temporary
sediment basin on-site to minimize sediment damage to Thomas
Lake.
Perhaps a segment of the silt curtain running along the west
side of the site could be eliminated because it appears from
the proposed contours that runoff will be directed towards
the site.
GC -4 Timing and Stabilization of Sediment Tranping
Measures_
Erosion and sediment control practices designed to contain
sediment on-site must be installed and functional before any
clearing, grubbing, or grading begins. The person
responsible for installing and maintaining these practices
must be identified on the E & SC Plan.
GC -5 Sediment Basins
Runoff from this site is proposed to drain directly into
Thomas Lake. To minimize sediment and nutrient loadings to
Thomas Lake, we recommend that a sediment basin be
constructed in the northeast c/o er of the site before any
1�
J + r
clearing, grubbing, and grading occurs. Runoff from the
site should be directed into this basin. We recommend that
this basin be designed according to the Soil Conservation
Service's (SCS) standards that are enclosed. (ie, minimum
detention time of 24 hours, minimum detention storage of 1.0
acre -inch per acre of drainage area). Sediment basins are
generally 70-80o effective in removing sediments. Thus, it
is important to implement upstream conservation practices.
GC -6 Cut and Fill Slopes
We recommend that lots be "benched". We expect that lots
2,3,5, & 6 will be leveled at some time to accommodate the
proposal structure. We recommend that drainage from these
lots be directed back into the hill rather than "with the
hill".
GC -7 Stormwater Management Criteria for
Controllinq Off -Site Erosion.
See description of GC -7 in the "General Criteria".
GC -8 Stabilization of Waterways and Stormsewer
n„f-I c+ -a
Not applicable.
GC -9 Stormsewer Inlet Protection
We do not anticipate a need for stormsewer inlet filters at
this time. If a sediment basin is used, lots are benched,
gravel access pads are used, and if the site is re -vegetated
in a timel-; manner, few problems should result.
GC -10 Working in or Crossing Watercources
Not applicable.
GC -11 Utility Construction
Re -vegetation of all areas disturbed by utility construction
should be addressed in the plan.
GC -12
Construction Access Routes
To minimize the tracking of mud by vehicles onto paved
roads, we recommend that a temporary gravel construction
entrance be installed (and maintained) at all ingress and
egress points. Specifications for this gravel pad are
contained in Eagan's Erosion Control Manual. The gravel pad
should be at least 50 ft. -in length, not 30 ft. as
identified on the prepared plan.
16l
GC -13 Disposition of Temporary Measures
All erosion and sediment control measures should be removed
after these measures are no longer required. The company
responsible for removing these measures should be identified
on the E & SC Plan.
GC -14 Maintenance
All erosion and sediment measures should be regularly
inspected and maintained as needed.
We recommend that a statement be placed on the development
plan that the builders will be responsible for E&SC during
construction.
At this time, we cannot approve the Erosion Control Plan
submitted for this project. We understand that with any new
program, it takes time to educate those involved in
developing adequate Erosion and Sediment Control Plans. We
hope that acceptable Erosion and Sediment Control Plans are
submitted with future Preliminary Plats.
We recommend that the Preliminary Plat be approved, but that
an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan be submitted and
approved by SWCD staff before a grading permit is issued.
cc: Eagan Center Association
Ralph Wagner, Probe Engineering
/7o
APC Minutes
March 24, 1937
7. This development shall dedicate a 50 foot, half right-of-way
for Wescott Road.
8. Water main looping as recommended shall be provided.
9. This development shall adhere to erosion/sediment control
measures as outlined in Exhibit "A".
10. A detailed landscape plan shall be a part of the final
package. If a phasing plan is used, all parking and service areas
for the building shall have phase I status.
Member McCrea noted that she would vote for the preliminary
plat, in spite of the 9 foot parking spaces. All voted yea.
SAFARI AT EAGAN - REPLAT TO THOMAS LAKE CENTER
The next public hearing convened by Chairman Hall was upon the
request of Linvill Properties, Inc. for a replat of Safari at Eagan
consisting of 6 lots on 10.7 acres with Lot 1 containing a 41,000
square foot strip center. Additional lots were proposed for
restaurant or small retail areas. Mr. Runkle gave a history of
several previous preliminary plats that had preceded this
preliminary plat. He also indicated that the County had now
eliminated the right -in right -out access on Cliff Road. Mr. Ralph
Linvill, partner with Mark Reilly, was present, in addition to the
architect J. D. McRae, and also a civil engineer and traffic
engineer. Mr. McRae presented elevation plans, descriptions of the
proposed colors, building materials and berming.
Sonja Tollefson was present and expressed concern regarding the
number of retail sites along Cliff Road. Mr. Myron Smith, a single
family owner on the south side of Cliff Road expressed concern
regarding the sign size, heights and locations. Mr. Ed Dunn
requested information as to the use of the property on the north
side of Safari Lane. Mr. Linvill indicated that they had no
interest in buying additional property. In response to member
McCrea's questions, the applicant through Mr. Lou Stockville, a real
estate agent, indicated that it had several interested tenants,
although had signed none at this time. It was indicated that
construction would start in May and the center would be open in
November. The developer indicated that the mechanical units were
proposed to be located on the tops of the building, but not visible,
due to the proposed facade. Member Trygg questioned the access on
Thomas Lake Road, which Mr. Colbert said the staff had maximized as
to the distance between Cliff Road and the access, without
increasing the entrance grade to a point that was safe.
171
7
APC Minutes
March 24, 1937
Mr. Bill Mauer of Probe Engineering indicated that the entrance
would have a 4% grade. It was indicated that the three proposed
pylon signs were over 300 feet apart. Member Voracek raised
questions as to the ability of semi -trailers to negotiate the rear
driveways in light of the slope and retaining walls. Mr. Harrison
questioned the need for future pylon signs for restaurants. In
response to Member Trygg's questions, Mr. Foertsch indicated there
was a need to address the drainage problem associated with the Cliff
Road upgrade and that water presently drained on to the property
under Cliff Road. Mr. Colbert said that the County would review
the signalization of the Thomas Lake Road and Cliff Road
intersection in 1988. In response to member McCrea's questions, the
applicant indicated that it was requesting 3 pylon signs for Lot 1.
Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
2. A review of the parking situation for the strip center shall
be done before building on Lot 4 occurs.
3. A financial guarantee shall be submitted with the final
landscape plan and not released until after one (1) year from the
installation date.
4. This plat shall be responsible for trails along Cliff Road
and Thomas Lake Road.
5. This plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission for their recommendations.
6. Roof top fan units shall not be allowed.
7. The trash shall be incorporated within the building on Lot
1.
8. All lots shall have a site plan review by the Council prior
to building permit issuance.
9. The sign band shall be uniform on all sides of the building.
10. All signage is subject to the one time sign fee of 2.50 per
square foot.
11. All of the perimeter landscaping shall be installed with
the first phase construction.
12. All drainage and ponding easements required by the City of
Eagan shall be dedicated on the final plat. A minimum 20 foot
easement shall be dedicated for all utilities not located within
public right-of-way. All other drainage and utility easements shall
be dedicated as required by staff as a part of the final plat.
APC Minutes
March 24, 1987
13. All permits required by local, County, Regional and State
agencies shall be acquired prior to final plat approval.
14. This development shall be responsible for all the
additional assessments required with this proposal as determined by
the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
15. This development shall comply with all applicable standard
engineering conditions.
16. If public improvements are to be installed under City
contract, the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for
installation by Council action prior to final plat approval.
17. If public improvements are installed privately, plans and
specifications for improvements must be prepared by a registered
engineer in accordance with City designed guidelines.
13. All costs of internal public improvements within this
development shall be the sole responsibility of this development.
19. A 75 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Cliff
Road.
20. The temporary drainage issue in regard to the upgrading of
Cliff Road shall be resolved.
All voted yea, except Hall who abstained because of the
potential appearance of a conflict resulting from an association
with two of the individuals present on behalf of the application.
Voracek moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend
continuance of the request for pylon signs until the entire parcel
can be reviewed. All voted in favor, except Hall who abstained for
the reasons previously stated.
OAK CLIFF ADDITION - REZONING
Chairman Hall called the public hearing in regard to the
application of Richard Winkler to rezone Lot 1, Block 2, and Lots 7
and 8, Block 1, Oak Cliff Addition from R-2 PD to R-1 PD to allow
single family homes in lieu of duplexes. Mr. Runkle introduced the
application which was a request to rezone 3 lots presently indicated
as duplex and adjacent to single family, into single family. Mr.
Dick Winkler was present and indicated again, that the Oak Cliff
Addition was surprising him and others as the homes became bigger
and more expensive than anticipated. Father Burns of the
neighboring Mary Mother Church, was present to express his agreement
and applaud the development that had occurred.
113
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -One
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND REZONING/OAR CLIFF ADDITION
N. Planned Development Amendment and Rezoning of R-2 lots to R-1
on Block 1 of the Oak Cliff Addition -- A public hearing was held
at the March 24, 1987 APC Meeting to consider an application for the
Rezoning of three R-2 lots to single family lots and a Planned
Development Amendment for Lot 1, Block 2, and Lots 7 and 8, Block 1
of the Oak Cliff Addition. The APC is recommending approval of the
Planned Development Amendment and Rezoning.
For a copy of the staff report on the R zoning Application submitted
by Richard Winkler refer to pages through
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page or pages
_111through for a copy of the Minutes.
It
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Rezoning for Richard Winkler on Lot 1, Block 2 and Lots 7 and 8,
Block 1, of the Oak Cliff Addition.
/%r
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING (OAK CLIFF ADDITION)
APPLICANT: RICHARD WINKLER
LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, AND LOTS 7 & 8, BLOCK 1, OAK
CLIFF ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: R-2 WITHIN WINKLER/JACKSON PD
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting
a rezoning of three R-2 lots to single family lots and a Planned
Development Amendment for Lot 1, Block 2, and Lots 7 and 8, Block 1,
of the Oak Cliff Addition. This plat is apart of the Winkler/Jackson
PD. No Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will be necessary.
The lots to the east are twinhomes and all of the lots to the west
and south are single family... These lots exceed all R-1 requirements
and are serviced by Mahogany Drive.
If approved, this Rezoning shall be subject to all applicable R-1
requirements.
* With this application, Mr. Winkler included a request for an
extension of the Winkler/ Jackson PD. That agreement was signed
on July 6, 1982 for a five year period.
san sA'as'v ��..•.,r
ne.:1
:: '�, • .•—iii®.. ��
OAK CLIFF y
1987
Lr•-
Lt
aaa +I.7
1`
.MAH•• ANY, 4 � � - I� � ��
a `. *tea, L. .b 'R•' s _ i
Lin. 'r v.a-'. _ n �'� i •-- "tip
icc
0 MAHOGANY WAY
41 V
V
12 2 /- ir
I ..� 2 ag . 3
—2-j Ldw-w L•—_ 'O ��ai :�� ml �lI ±�I. ���
13 :I I. I-� 1�1=era[•a IZ
JI `.I ~ 1 Y ^� 4 j. ', ` 4-./J,"�`\'a
2 cc
>� 91 C
14 I': t u a•w G. ,1..
.t LI 1 a0 . I`�a__—I --- ' I
• ^r..=- t 3 �e1 `6 i 2 I L:�:-9 a
17
1.0
15
o
4 6 ?,.c'
L s 15•�T111 _M1!�•� 1s t ��._._wi ;....•.1sJ7� '/• �•%s, �i''lL�s ``\
IW
It
17 : _ _ +�,_••'lL iii Y N i asa t .� c . Lt 1' „ •' VSIB+
_jam yl•.� .A a..
8 TA
- �-F,-�; `. - • -:Ja f ,' I is 1 i7�� r� � � t 4 I b
fu
I I Lam— '' w,, ,.�' ;>3 >a
20•= •STREET 't a L•JAMES STRE
4.
-.:�,_ �• �1 I .. � 11 q .,\ rl -� -'
21 -_ __L.: 2 ;c - biii ,`E
5 4 3 2
Y
----J' '_r,,..__. -JL .... J l a•.. .•� r. 1 I _.w \ ww ____—_____—__"4a
'� .R'rM0/l •
,� SCa1L.L IN Fier
INSET SCALE
176
VICINITY MAP
z�� v a:{F
NORTH
NO SCALE
-r-
SEC. 31, T. 27, R. 23
DRAINAGE AND UTILITI
ARE SHOWN
:
V
4 Y ' L
I
III:IIR: 5 f';LT IN Will -III, 1w
II:II I l:t 1.1:11. A:III .\11.1111111111: I
111 11.1.1' II. Vl Nlll, 11:11115 1
t':u A11.111Illlla: 51'KI.1.T 1.1 tIi_
APC Minutes
March 24, 1987
13. All permits required by local, County, Regional and State
agencies shall be acquired prior to final plat approval.
14. This development shall be responsible for all the
additional assessments required with this proposal as determined by
the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
15. This development shall comply with all applicable standard
engineering conditions.
16. If public improvements are to be installed under City
contract, the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for
installation by Council action prior to final plat approval.
17. If public improvements are installed privately, plans and
specifications for improvements must be prepared by a registered
engineer in accordance with City designed guidelines.
13. All costs of internal public improvements within this
development shall be the sole responsibility of this development.
19. A 75 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Cliff
Road.
20. The temporary drainage issue in regard to the upgrading of
Cliff Road shall be resolved.
All voted yea, except Hall who abstained because of the
potential appearance of a conflict resulting from an association
with two of the individuals present on behalf of the application.
Voracek moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend
continuance of the request for pylon signs until the entire parcel
can be reviewed. All voted in favor, except Hall who abstained for
the reasons previously stated.
OAK CLIFF ADDITION - REZONING
Chairman Hall called the public hearing in regard to the
application of Richard Winkler to rezone Lot 1, Block 2, and Lots 7
and 8, Block 1, Oak Cliff Addition from R-2 PD to R-1 PD to allow
single family homes in lieu of duplexes. Mr. Runkle introduced the
application which was a request to rezone 3 lots presently indicated
as duplex and adjacent to single family, into single family. Mr.
Dick Winkler was present and indicated again, that the Oak Cliff
Addition was surprising him and others as the homes became bigger
and more expensive than anticipated. Father Burns of the
neighboring Mary Mother Church, was present to express his agreement
and applaud the development that had occurred.
ill
APC Minutes
March 24, 1937
Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the rezoning and amendment of the Planned Development
Agreement. All voted aye.
It was indicated that a notice of public hearing would be
necessary for the extension of the Planned Development Agreement as
requested by the developer.
LOT 4, CARLSON ACRES - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
Mr. Runkle introduced the application of Wally and Michael
Nelson to rezone a residential single family lot, presently a legal
non -conforming use for construction storage, to LB (Limited
Business) on approximately 1.3 acres at the intersection of Pilot
Knob Road and Diffley Road. The request was to allow an 11,520
square foot office building on a single 60,000 square foot lot.
Hans Timper of Cedar Corporation was present on behalf of the
applicants. Mr. Timper indicated that the proposal was to construct
one building, possibly in two parts, that all construction storage
would be removed during the construction process. He also reviewed
a three page report indicating the pros and cons of the use of the
property for various uses. Mrs. Gail Stahl was present. As a
landowner adjacent to the property, she indicated that non-
conforming use, in her opinion, had created additional water run-off
on her property. She indicated she had to pay $240.00 for a survey
to determine that the Nelsons were expanding beyond their own
property lines. Mr. Jim DelGreco, a resident at the intersection of
Sequoia and Sigfrid, read a letter in opposition to the proposal
from neighbors and indicated that two other neighbors had indicated
their opposition.
Mr. Harrison indicated that it was his position that the
rezoning of the single parcel would be spot zoning. Harrison moved,
Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the rezoning and
to direct staff to review the expansion of non -conforming use. All
voted in favor except Gustafson who voted no.
ADJOURNMENT
Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to adjourn the
meeting at 10:10 p.m. All voted affirmatively.
Secretary
APC
DGK
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty-two
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING/WALLY NELSON
O. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning of Lot 4,
Carlson Acres from R-1 to LB -- A public hearing was held by the
Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on
March 24, 1987, to consider a request submitted by Wally and Michael
Nelson to rezone approximately 1.38 acres from R-1, Residential
Single District to LB, Limited Business, to allow two (2) 11,520
total square feet office buildings. The Preliminary Plat would
consist of 60,000 square feet and contain one lot. The APC is
recommending denial of both the Rezoning and Comprehensive Guide
Plan.
Enclosed on pages ffV _ through J is a copy of the Staff
Report. For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to Minutes
enclosed on page or pages _JF5 -
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning from R-1 to LB as proposed
by Wally and Michael Nelson.
17�
.r,
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: WALLY B & MICHAEL NELSON
LOCATION: LOT 4, CARLSON ACRES
EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1.987
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 19, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED: The first application submitted is a request
to rezone approximately 1.38 acres from R-1, Residential Single
District, to LB, Limited Business, to allow two 11,520 total sq. ft.
office buildings. The Preliminary Plat would consist of 60,000 sq.
ft. (1.3 acres) and contain one lot.
ZONING & LAND USE: Currently, the parcel is zoned R-1, Residential
Single District, and would only allow a single family development to
occur in this area. There is an existing home/office and outside
storage for a construction company on the site. This company has
been operating for the past 25 years and currently has been --
established as a legal nonconforming use. Therefore, this business
operation can continue to remain and operate as long as the use does
not increase in intensity or size. The Comprehensive Guide Plan
also designates this parcel as D-1, low density residential, with
the density of 0-3 dwelling units per acre.
COMMENTS:- The applicants are proposing to remove the single family
home and construct the first :office building containing 5,760 sq.
ft. and retain the outside storage and existing office until the new
facility is built. The second phase would then be constructed and
contain approximately 6,048 sq. ft. This office is proposed to be a
one-story building. The parking spaces provided is 61, which is the
required number by the zoning ordinance.
Access to this facility would be from Diffley Road on the westerly
corner of the plat. This access would be from the relocated service
road running along the southerly boundary of Diffley Road. No
access is being proposed from Pilot Knob Road. It appears that the
buildings meet all setback requirements and parking requirements
from the County roads.
In review of this particuiar plan, it appears to be more of a
land use question - does the City rezone a new parcel which has
not been designated or proposed on the Comprehensive Guide or
does the City follow the guide with the D-1 land use and allow
Mr. Nelson to operate as a legal nonconforming use as long as
the business does not increase in Qsize or intensity.
j
.r,
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: WALLY B & MICHAEL NELSON
LOCATION: LOT 4, CARLSON ACRES
EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 24, 1.987
DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 19, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED: The first application submitted is a request
to rezone approximately 1.38 acres from R-1, Residential Single
District, to LB, Limited Business, to allow two 11,520 total sq. ft.
office buildings. The Preliminary Plat would consist of 60,000 sq.
ft. (1.3 acres) and contain one lot.
ZONING & LAND USE: Currently, the parcel is zoned R-1, Residential
Single District, and would only allow a single family development to
occur in this area. There is an existing home/office and outside
storage for a construction company on the site. This company has
been operating for the past 25 years and currently has been --
established as a legal nonconforming use. Therefore, this business
operation can continue to remain and operate as long as the use does
not increase in intensity or size. The Comprehensive Guide Plan
also designates this parcel as D-1, low density residential, with
the density of 0-3 dwelling units per acre.
COMMENTS:- The applicants are proposing to remove the single family
home and construct the first :office building containing 5,760 sq.
ft. and retain the outside storage and existing office until the new
facility is built. The second phase would then be constructed and
contain approximately 6,048 sq. ft. This office is proposed to be a
one-story building. The parking spaces provided is 61, which is the
required number by the zoning ordinance.
Access to this facility would be from Diffley Road on the westerly
corner of the plat. This access would be from the relocated service
road running along the southerly boundary of Diffley Road. No
access is being proposed from Pilot Knob Road. It appears that the
buildings meet all setback requirements and parking requirements
from the County roads.
In review of this particuiar plan, it appears to be more of a
land use question - does the City rezone a new parcel which has
not been designated or proposed on the Comprehensive Guide or
does the City follow the guide with the D-1 land use and allow
Mr. Nelson to operate as a legal nonconforming use as long as
the business does not increase in Qsize or intensity.
CONDITIONS: WALLY B & MICHAEL NELSON
1. The standard plat conditions should be adhered to.
2. The plat should be subject to a Park's Dedication Fee.
3. A detailed landscape plan shall be provided and reviewed
and a landscape bond shall be submitted and not released
until one year after the landscaping has been completed.
4. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted and reviewed by
City staff prior to issuance of a building permit.
5. Only an office building shall be allowed as a permitted
use in this Limited Business District.
�L�J ���� ��-�
PROPOSED DIFFLEY ROAD
PROPOSED .......
i
OFFICE COMPLEX corporation
FOR W.V.NELSON=EAGAN.MIRAL�cedor
--- I
t-711
C)
C4
A C2
A
Z
PROPOSEO OFFICE COMPLEX
Ct-4
-j
7
PROPOSED .......
i
OFFICE COMPLEX corporation
FOR W.V.NELSON=EAGAN.MIRAL�cedor
--- I
t-711
PROPOSED DIFFLEY ROAD
I I
w
u
�
L
r�
=
i
n Riley
y�i
Yc
O
.
1 f
f
m
o
n
LP
I
PC
4
07
a
A
4 `
i
�:
_ I
Yln��
L
r
I I
w
u
r�
C3
i
n Riley
y�i
Yc
O
.
1 f
I I
w
C3
i
n Riley
y�i
ON It
O
1 f
f
m
o
n
LP
I
PC
0
07
a
A
4 `
i
�:
_ I
- •••� PROPOSED i..w.w e,«. .I....
OFFICE COMPLEX cedar corporation
EOR W.V.NMON cc
EAGAN,MINN. n. :a
w
n Riley
y�i
ON It
'�•
1 f
Ol-
��
n
LP
.. r
0
a
i
- •••� PROPOSED i..w.w e,«. .I....
OFFICE COMPLEX cedar corporation
EOR W.V.NMON cc
EAGAN,MINN. n. :a
APC Minutes
March 24, 1937
Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the rezoning and amendment of the Planned Development
Agreement. All voted aye.
It was indicated that a notice of public hearing would be
necessary for the extension of the Planned Development Agreement as
requested by the developer.
LOT 4, CARLSON ACRES - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
Mr. Runkle introduced the application of Wally and Michael
Nelson to rezone a residential single family lot, presently a legal
non -conforming use for construction storage, to LB (Limited
Business) on approximately 1.3 acres at the intersection of Pilot
Knob Road and Diffley Road. The request was to allow an 11,520
square foot office building on a single 60,000 square foot lot.
Hans Timper of Cedar Corporation was present on behalf of the
applicants. Mr. Timper indicated that the proposal was to construct
one building, possibly in two parts, that all construction storage
would be removed during the construction process. He also reviewed
a three page report indicating the pros and cons of the use of the
property for various uses. Mrs. Gail Stahl was present. As a
landowner adjacent to the property, she indicated that non-
conforming use, in her opinion, had created additional water run-off
on her property. She indicated she had to pay $240.00 for a survey
to determine that the Nelsons were expanding beyond their own
property lines. Mr. Jim DelGreco, a resident at the intersection of
Sequoia and Sigfrid, read a letter in opposition to the proposal
from neighbors and indicated that two other neighbors had indicated
their opposition.
Mr. Harrison indicated that it was his position that the
rezoning of the single parcel would be spot zoning. Harrison moved,
Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the rezoning and
to direct staff to review the expansion of non -conforming use. All
voted in favor except Gustafson who voted no.
ADJOURNMENT
Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to adjourn the
meeting at 10:10 p.m. All voted affirmatively.
DGK
Secretary - APC
)9-15
10
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Three
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT/REQUIREMENT OF SERVICE BAYS IN GB DISTRICT
P. Ordinance Amendment to the City Code, Chapter 11.20 Subdivision
11C, Requiring Service Bays in General Business Districts With Motor
Fuel Sales -- Recently, it was discovered that during the ordinance
conification there was no requirement included in the City Code
under General Business Districts that require service bays with the
sale of motor fuel sales. Since this regulatory language exists in
all other commercial zoning districts, the City Attorney's Office
was directed to prepare an Ordinance Amendment that would keep the
General Business District consistent with all other commercial
zoning districts. An Ordinance Amendment was prepared by the City
Attorney's Office and because any amendment to the zoning ordinance
requires a public hearing before the Advisory Planning Commission,
this item was considered by the APC in an official public hearing at
the March 26, 1987, meeting.
The APC is recommending approval of the Ordinance Amendment as
presented. For a copy of the Ordinance Amendment as prepared by the
City Attorney's Office refer to page .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the
Ordinance Amendment to the City Code, Chapter 11.20 Subdivision 11C,
that requires service bays in General Business Districts with motor
fuel sales.
C
ORDINANCE N0. , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE,
CHAPTER 11, ENTITLED "LAND USE REGULATIONS" BY CHANGING PROVISIONS RELATING TO
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR MOTOR FUEL SALES IN GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICTS AND
BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 11.99, WHICH,
AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Eagan City Code, Chapter 11, is hereby amended by changing
Section 11.20, Subd. ll.C. to read as follows:
Section 11.20, Subd. ll.0 (1). Motor fuel sales as part of a full—
service service station including service bays for vehicle repair and
maintenance.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for
Violations" is hereby adopted in its entirety by reference as though repeated
verbatim herein.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST:
By:
Its Clerk
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published in the legal newspaper:
IV
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Four
REPLAY LEMAY LAKE HILLS TOWNHOUSE PROJECT
Q. Replat of a Townhouse Project to Convert from Rental to Owner
Occupancy Status -- At the March 26, 1987 APC Meeting, the Staff
presented a replat of the LeMay Lake Hills Project on behalf of a
developer who is requesting the conversion of a conventional rental
townhouse facility to owner occupancy. Physically, there are no
changes to the project; it is merely the process which has to occur
in order to convert the plat from rental to owner occupancy.
Attached on page /el _ is a copy of the replat converting LeMay
Lake Hills. The City Planner will provide any additional comments
regarding the procedural transaction for the LeMay Lake Hills
Project at the meeting on Tuesday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the LeMay
Lake Hills conversion of a conventional rental townhouse facility
project to that of an owner occupancy.
• xx.cr �i
mazer ` CT: •��
. vi `sa [ -= �3 Q •� '.a as `�
S •�'��;;--ie3"e �,_;:��`_ 9w -f 101
-
XAr
t,00L:at p
• 1- f 101
,-"N:-7
a Mn
11 101 r
_
f N�4ua
aaua+.t
i 101
N 101
a • -�
a 8�
» 101
- if 10'7
f N�4ua
•_.-�
liac
M 107
”
• •al It
'
tl Lcn
s
f
IY
3.
al Lai
» 101
- if 10'7
,•taw
��
i »Lal
3.
t
ail Q
'- +l +Y layt.m..al Y \\ 3 3� i \``'• •n _ � .. a_l
a 3iI-�_ ,"'✓ •.`. _ y,ta,ara' 11� __[jiltii 02
8 'F+ �
�•a;caau:i'' •aytte.aa::5 j vacaa A ~ : y11
119 1011
— �
lof Loll
of lol ' Nl Kant H,'g
iy
eee43t1.1,K R.a�.n - Y r w _, _aA• /
>.00,OLJt1—l-t4aWa- e"`r�; a� � n d"-10 � '•af'r
(fa 1011 ';/j-� ;„•awa .. a, ,
4z LD1
ez lal
107
41y4ua.Y.n )_ ttuN_..t
LLS loll
•l,eaee.+aCp'L-� t< 107 cq lo, Flo/
12 lol >.ca•atF ��a _ la `l9
laeaet�s.l a.tut..w W J g .K'T�yy -
laza�ll sayaawa'�+t �` lnaaNw "II O V / il:
l6z loll
!z lol 'fit:--,---•—�� oa I —_
�a met.ur a.aw 7t lae�9 -1,;y It lo,
lK
loll -a `I 1p�Z t 7 I ' '-- _ •' Y
em�i 101 I,�ay.s'= 101 �C QaGM �q S ... ' S= y Q
• .�j}, i� _ °1 ; - a+al 101 � d I ♦� til"( ,. . �
j33 33 tl 107 jpyy „a,a„„+
0
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Five
The Additional Items relating to Public Improvement Contracts and
Private Improvement Contracts are listed separate from Consent.
However, City staff discussion will be limited on each item unless
there is a specific question or questions by the City Council. It
is suggested that each item be identified as an Agenda Item and
additional discussion will be given by City staff if there are any
questions by the City Council.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
Item 1. Contract 87-11, Approve P lans/Order Advertisement for Bids
(Greensboro 2nd Addition) --As a result of the public hearing
process, the Council authorized the preparation of detailed plans
and specifications for the installation of streets and utilities to
service the Greensboro 2nd Addition. These plans have now been
completed and are being presented to the Council for their review
and consideration of authorizing the advertisement for formal bids.
The Director of Public Works will be available to discuss and
further explain the details of this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 87-11 (Greensboro 2nd Addition - streets and utilities) and
authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30
a.m. on Friday, May 1, 1987.
Item 2. Contract 87-12, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids
(Lexington Square 6th/Northview Park Road) --As a result of the
public hearing process, the Council authorized the preparation of
detailed plans and specifications for the installation of streets
and utilities to service the Lexington Square 6th Addition
incorporating the upgrading of Northview Park Road from Lexington
Avenue to Northview Park. These plans have now been completed and
are being presented 'to the Council for their review and
consideration of authorizing the advertisement for formal bids. The
Director of Public Works will be available to discuss and further
explain the details associated with this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 87-12 (Lexington Square 6th Addition/Northview Park Road -
streets and utilities) and authorize the advertisement for a bid
opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, May 1, 1987.
Item 3. Contract 87-14, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids
(Eagan Hills Farm/Country Hallow - Trunk Sanitary Lift Station) --
With the proposed development of the Eagan Hills Farm concept
development, Stafford Place, and high school facilities, it is
necessary to install the major trunk sanitary sewer lift station in
the eastern central portion of the City. Although the public
X90
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Six
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS CONTINUED:
hearing process has not been completed for the installation of the
related trunk infrastructure, it is necessary to proceed with the
bid solicitation process for the lift station structure itself due
to the 4 - 5 month lead time associated with the manufacturing and
installation of the related pump facilities and electrical control
panels. Therefore, staff is requesting Council authorization to
proceed with the bid solicitation for the equipment only. The
Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further detail
this proposed contract.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 87-14 (Eagan Hills Farm/Country Hallow - trunk sanitary
lift station) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to
be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, May 1, 1987.
Item 4. County Contract 32-18, Approve Plans/Resolution (Cliff Road
and Galax ie/B lackhawk Road - Traffic Signals) --We have received the
detailed plans from Dakota County for the installation of traffic
signals at the above referenced intersection. They are also
requesting the City Council to approve the resolution enclosed on
page 4qk which is required prior to final state aid approval.
These signals will provide for full traffic control at this critical
intersection. Left turn movements will be allowed on a left turn
arrow only.
In the past, the City Council has expressed a concern regarding
traffic signal design which does not allow the left turn movement on
a green light but rather restricts it to a left turn only on a green
arrow indicator. The traffic signals at Cliff Road and Cedar Avenue
have been used as an example of the system desirable by the Council.
However, the City Police Department has experienced a considerable
number of accidents by allowin the more permissible left turn
movement. Enclosed on page allow
is a copy of a memo received
from the Police Department reg rding this matter. Also enclosed
is a copy of a letter received from Pete Sorenson, Count Traffic
Engineer. This letter is enclosed on pages �through
Taking into consideration the time required to approve the plans
through the state aid process, ordering and manufacturing the
materials and installation, it is anticipated these traffice signals
will be operational by late October of this year.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
County Contract 32-18 (Cliff Road and Galaxie/Blackhawk Road -
Traffic Signals) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
the referenced resolution.
i9�
nrcni IIrrnu
WHEREAS, plans for Project No. 19-632-12 showing proposed traffic
signal construction and miscellaneous construction on County State Aid
Highway No. 32 within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project have
been prepared and presented to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all
things approved.
Dated this day of 1987
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
County of
City of
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct
copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of
at a meeting thereof held in the City of
Minnesota, on the_ _ _day o
1987, as disclosed by the records of said City
n my possession.
(SEAL)
/7v
tit- Clerk
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
police deportment
2 April, 1987
T0: TOM COLBERT
FROM: CAPTAIN ASZMANN
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SIGNALS - CLIFF & CEDAR
DIFFLEY & CEDAR
I have received a request from Patrol to have the
above intersections evaluated for left turns onto
Cedar Avenue.
Apparently we have been called to accidents where
the left turning vehicles are not yielding to oncoming
traffic, hence causing accidents and near misses.
Their concern is the potential of serious injuries
with these type of accidents.
Thank you,
Ken
/lb
/73
THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
JAY M. BERTHE
Chlef of Police
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
Administrative Captain
KENNETH D. ASZMANN
of (za an
Operations Captain
2 April, 1987
T0: TOM COLBERT
FROM: CAPTAIN ASZMANN
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SIGNALS - CLIFF & CEDAR
DIFFLEY & CEDAR
I have received a request from Patrol to have the
above intersections evaluated for left turns onto
Cedar Avenue.
Apparently we have been called to accidents where
the left turning vehicles are not yielding to oncoming
traffic, hence causing accidents and near misses.
Their concern is the potential of serious injuries
with these type of accidents.
Thank you,
Ken
/lb
/73
THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
DAKOTA COUNTY DAVID L. EVERDS, P.E.
COUNTY ENGINEER
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT (612) 431-1150
7300 WEST 1471h STREET. SUITE h402 APPLE VALLEY. MINNESOTA 5.51:'
February 5, 1987
Mr. M. L. Robinson, P.E.
District Traffic Engineer
Mn/DOT, District 9
3485 Hadley Ave. N.
N. St. Paul, MN 55109
Re: Traffic Signal Operation
TH 77 at CSAH 32 in Eagan
Dear Mike:
I have received communication from the Eagan Police Department
requesting re-evaluation of the signal operation at the interchange
signals. The operation of the signals at the TH 77 interchanges (CSAR
30 and CSAH 32) allows a "permissive/protected" left turn movement
from the County roads on to the freeway ramps. This operation is
different from the current operating signals at the I -35E interchanges
in Eagan.
To promote uniformity in the operation of the signals in this area
and to address issues of safety problems mentioned by the Eagan Police
Department, I request that Mn/DOT study the operation of the signals
on TH 77 at CSAH 30 and CSAH 32 to determine whether it would be
appropriate to change the signal phasing and displays to a "protected"
only left turn opertion.
Please contact me if I can provide additional information to you or
be of assistance to you on this request.
Sincerely,
qPetMeL. Sorenson
Traffic Engineer
PLS/bv
cc: Ken Aszmann, Eagan P.D.
/V
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
WEL', APR 1. 1987, 1:52 PM
ACCIDENTS -CLIFF u 77
PAGE 1
C-uFFENGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STREET -NAME
STREET -TYPE
X -ST -NAME
X -ST -TYPE
DATE -REPORTED
CASE -NO
PIN -OFFICER
BEAT
1424
DIFFLEY
RD
RAHN
RD
870124
0700/407
20
3320
9424 S.Z
CLIFF
RD
HWY 77
370126
8700i491
4
3320
9424
CLIFF
RD
CLIFF
DR
870129
$1001731
0
332?)
9424
DIFFLEY
RD
NICOLS
RD
870130
8101816
10
3320
9424
DIFFLC
RD
BLACKHAWK
RD
870.319
87004942
4
3320
9424
DIFFLEY
RD
BLACKHAWK
RD
870327
9700554E
20
3320
942'6
SANDSTONE
DR
810207
87002267
34
3320
9440
SILVER BELL
RD
BEAU DE RUE
DR
870301
8700=345
2
3320
91144
SIBLEY MEMORIAL
Hk
870108
87000414
0
3320
9444
CINNAMON RIDGE
RD
87000426
23
3320
9444
CLIFF
RD
SLATERS
RD
810109
37000471
to
3320
9444
CLIFF
RD
NICOLS
RD
870122
81001260
4
3320
9444
NICOLS
RD
87001274
20
3320
Sa
CLIFF
RD
HWY 77
870125
81001469
17
3320
9444
ERIN
DR
NICOLS
RD
870128
870016i9
16
3320
9444
CLIFF
RD
NICOLS
RD
810129
07001753
22
3320
1444
DIFFLEY
RD
SIBLEY MEM
HW
870206
87002168
4
3320
9444
CLIFF
RD
RAHN
RD
870201
87002227
23
3320
9444
METCALF
DR
870221
87003:60
20
3320
94Y4
DIFFLEY
RD
BLACKHAWK
RD
870325
87005'93
6
3320
9444
SILVER BELL
RD
HWY 13
B10330
87005698
20
3320
9445
MARBLE
LA
870118
8700108
B
3320
9445
BEAU DE RUE
DR
810129
87001719
6
3320
9446
CEDARVALE SHOP CTR
870318
870048/6
4
3320
94512
DIFFLEY
RD
THOMAS LAKE
RD
870324
87005332
32
3320
9453
VALLEY VIEW
DR
870126
87001525
8
3320
9453
`-VALLEY VIEW
DR
870211
87002648
17
3320
942
VALLEY VIEW
DR
RAHN
RD
870228
87003765
17
3320
9453
DIFFLEY
RD
870309
67AO4337
20
3320
9453
CLIFF
RD
SLATERS
RD
87015
87004680
16
3320
94x-3
BALLANTRAE
RD
870316
87004756
18
3320
31r
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Seven
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS CONTINUED:
Item 5. Contract 85-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Industrial
Park Trunk Storm Sewer and Streets) --We have received a request for
final payment, via our consultant engineering firm, along with a
certification of compliance with City -approved plans and
specifications for the installation of the trunk storm sewer through
the Cedar Industrial Park, and the installation of streets and
utilities necessary for the extension of Blackhawk Road to Kennebec
Road. All final inspections have been performed and verified by
representatives of the Public Works Department and favorable action
for final acceptance and perpetual maintenance is requested.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS
final payment for Contract 85-5
sewer and streets) in the amount
Inc., and accept the improvements
ITEM: To approve the eleventh and
(Cedar Industrial Park trunk storm
of $9,582.35 to ARI Contracting,
for perpetual maintenance.
Item 6. Contract 87-1, Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize
Advertisement for Bids (Park Construction for Six Parks) --Plans and
specifications have been prepared for Contract 87-1, park
construction for six parks, which include Lakeside Park, O'Leary
Park, Carnelian Park, Vienna Woods Park, Thomas Lake Park and the
recent Northview Addition. Funding for the parks construction is
from the 1984 Bond and Park Site Fund. In the case of the Thomas
Lake Park, from the LAWCON/LCMR Grant and the Park Site Fund.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans and
specifications for Contract 87-1, Parks Construction and for a bid
opening on May 1, 1987 at 2:00 p.m.
Item 7. Contract 87-13, Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize
Advertisement for Bids (Park Shelter Buildings) --Plans and
specifications and construction documents have been prepared for the
construction of park shelter buildings for four (4) parks located in
Quarry, Carnelian, Walnut Hill and Blue Cross Parks. Funding for
the construction is from the 1984 Parks Bond Program. The City used
the architectural firm of Schwartz/Weber in 1985/1986 and because
the park shelter buildings should not deviate from the plans that
were prepared by Schwartz/Weber for other park locations, the
architectural firm was contracted on an hourly basis to complete
preliminary design and layout work for shelters in the four (4)
aforementioned parks.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans and
specifications for Contract 87-13, Park Shelter Buildings and for a
bid opening on April 30, 1987.
14
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Eight
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS CONTINUED:
Item 8. Contract 86-2, Approve Supplemental Agreement #3 (Nicols
Road) --Supplemental Agreement (Change Order) #3 is comprised of four
parts:
Part A: An existing buried box culvert was encountered during .the
construction of storm sewer facilities and had to be removed (Add
$1,856.25).
Part B: Due to the early onset of winter weather, existing
commercial business driveways could not be reconstructed and a
temporary access had to be provided for those businesses near the
intersection of Cliff Road and Nicols Road. (Add $4,069.50).
Part C: A groundwater spring condition was encountered near Rahn
Park which required the installation of a drain field to dry out the
subgrade to allow continued construction. (Add $2,980.00).
Part D: During the lowering of an existing water main, a temporary
bypass had to be provided to maintain service to the adjacent
commercial businesses. (Add $825.00).
The total amount of Supplemental Agreement #3 is $9,730.75, which
has been reviewed by the Public Works Director and is being
recommended for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Supplemental
Agreement #3 to Contract 86-2 (Nicols Road) and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
Item 9. Contract 86-23, Approve Change Order #2 (Holland Lake Trunk
Storm Sewer Outlet) --Change Order #2 consists of three parts
described as follows:
Part A: The existing subgrade material within the road bed of Oak
Pond Road is not suitable for reconstruction during winter
conditions. Subsequently, this material had to be replaced with
suitable subgrade soil. (Add $1,500.00).
Part B: Buried trees and debris were encountered during trench
construction in the northeast corner of Cliff and Pilot Knob Road.
Extra costs were incurred for its removal and disposal. (Add
$2,000.00).
Part C: The contract inadvertently omitted the installation of two
flared end sections for the storm sewer system. (Add $1,425.17).
The total amount of this Change Order is $4,925.17 and has been
reviewed in detail by the Director of Public Works and is being
recommended for favorable action.
177
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Nine
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS CONTINUED:
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #2 to
Contract 86-23 (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
Agenda Information Memo
April 7, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Forty
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
B. Private Improvement Contract --
Item 1. Contract 83-F, Final Acceptance (St. Francis Woods 3rd
Addition) --We have received a request for final acceptance through
our consulting engineering firm along with a certification of
compliance to City approved plans and specifications for the
installation of streets and utilities within this subdivision. All
final inspections have been verified by representatives of the
Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable
Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Contract 83-F (St.
Francis Woods 3rd Addition) and accept those public improvements for
perpetual maintenance.
Item 2. Contract 85-D, Final Acceptance (Westbury 4th Addition) --We
have received a request for final acceptance by the developer
through our consulting engineering firm along with the certification
of compliance to City approved plans and specifications for the
installation of streets and utilities within this subdivision. All
final inspections have been verified by representatives of the
Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable
Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 85-D
(Westbury 4th Addition) and accept those public improvements for
perpetual maintenance.
Item 3. -Contract 85-Q, Final Acceptance (Blackhawk Townhouse
Apartments) --We have received a request for final acceptance from
the developer through our consulting engineering firm along with the
certification of compliance with City approved plans and
specifications for the installation of utilities to service the
Blackhawk Townhouse Apartments. All final inspections have been
verified by representatives of the Public Works Department and found
to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 85-Q
(Blackhawk Townhouse Apartments) and accept those improvements for
perpetual maintenance.
i99