05/19/1987 - City Council RegularNote: The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. and discussion of agenda items will commence at
that time; however, no official action Will be taken concerning individual items until
after the polls close at 8:00 p.m. due to the school board elections.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY BALL
MAY 19, 1987
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES
P.� III. 6:40 - SET BOND SALE FOR 1987 REFUNDING ISSUES
IV. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
pp 2 A. Lone Oak Addition Traffic Study
I
V. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
Q , 3 A. Personnel Items
I S B. Proclamation - National Pause for the Pledge Observance
�C. One -Day Consumption & Display License, St. John Neumann Church
ID D. Sale of Squad Car and Animal Control Van
E. Project 501, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale Center Industrial
Park 8th Addition - Watermain)
�jk F. Project 503, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 8th Addition -
Streets and Utilities)
G. Project 449, Receive Revised Report/Order Public Hearing (Country Club Market -
Driveway Improvement)
P13 H. Approve Final Plat, Carbone's Addition
!s I. Approve Final Plat, Greensboro 2nd Addition
P
VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
P17 A. Public Hearing for Project 498, Stafford Place, Streets and Utilities
'soB. Public Hearing for the Vacation of Utility Easements, Norwest 2nd Addition
�(continued from 5/5/87 City Council meeting)
Public Hearing for Project 482, Nancy Circle, Streets
Co'c-k. Street Name Change, Town Centre Drive
VII. / OLD BUSINESS
(0,5A. Approve Plans for Lakeside Park, Contract 87-1, Park Improvements
`yr) q B. Variance Consideration for Certain Parking Lot Improvements for Fire Stations
1, 2, and 3
P� -C. Consideration of Ordinance Amendment Regarding the Regulation of Off -Site
Temporary Advertising Signs
D. Special Permit (dominium Group) for Four, 4' X 81, Two -Directional Signs to be
located Near the Intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Cliff Road; the Intersec-
tion of Thomas Lake and Cliff Road; Lot 2, Block 1, Knob Hill Professional
Park; and the Intersection of Diff ley Road and Thomas Lake Road
Q,q s E. Rezoning (Pondview - Molinaro & Associates) of Approximately 30 Acres from A
(Agriculture) to PD (Planned Development) to Commercial and Mixed Residential
Planned Development Located in Part of the E1/2 of Section 16, Abutting
Duckwood Drive to the North and Pilot Knob Road to the East
F. Rezoning (R & B Addition - Leroy Rother and Gerald Braun) of 2.08 Acres from R-
4 (Multiple) to CSC (Community Shopping Center) a Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment, a Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot and a Parking Stall
Variance Located N of Crestridge Ln and S of Duckwood Dr, NW1/4 of Sec 15
C 130G. Preliminary Plat (Blue Ridge Addition - L.A. Laukka Development) of Outlots E &
F of the Lone Oak Addition into a 9.8 acre lot for an Office/Showroom and Two
Outlots Containing 37.25 Acres Located in the SW1/4 of Section 1 Abutting Hwy
55 on the West and Lone Oak Road on the South
VIII.
NEW BUSINESS
A.
Gambling License for Pull -Tabs at Richard's Food and Liquor, 4185 South Robert
Trail, for St. Joseph's Home for Children
157B .
57B.
Conditional Use Permit - Q -Petroleum - Conditional Use Permit for Pylon Signage
Located in the NW 1/4 of Section 32 West of I -35W in the Rahncliff Addition
P. «� C.
Lexington Pointe 2nd Addition - Tri -Land Properties - An Amendment to the
Lexington South Planned Development, a Rezoning of 57.6 acres from CSC (Com-
munity Shopping Center) within the Lexington South P.D. to a P.D.R-1 (Single
Family District), a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and'a Preliminary Plat
consisting of 169 Lts located NE 1/4 of Sec 26 S of Diff ley & E of Lexington
D.
Ultra IV Addition - Ultra IV, Inc. - Preliminary Plat for a Restaurant/Bar with
1
Athletic Fields in a LI District located on Tract F, RLS Lot #4 West of Hwy 13
between Blackhawk & Shawnee Roads in the W 1/2 of Section 17 and a Conditional
Use Permit for On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Beer Sales, Pylon Sign and Recreational Use
C)2>
'
in a LI District
PQ E.
Eagan Royale Addition - Partnership Royale -Rezoning of approximately 46.848
Acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a Preliminary Plat
Consisting of 65 Lots and 1 Outlot Located in the SE 1/4 of Section 31 Abutting
a��
Safari Pass on the East and Cedar Avenue on the West
p• F.
Country Hollow Addition - Progress Engineering, Inc. - Rezoning of Approxi -
11
mately 45.47 Acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a Pre-
liminary Plat Consisting of 99 Lots Located in the W1/2 of the SE 1/4 of
oQ
Section 24 Abutting Diffley Rd on S & E of Dodd
a30G.
Williams and LaRue Addition II, Preliminary Plat for Five Single -Family Lots on
1.9 Acres, Located NE Corner Lexington/Wescott SW1/4 Sec 14 Lexington &
Wescott, SW1/4 of Sec 14
IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS
- 41A. Review and Consideration of Two and Five Year Action Plans for the Economic
Development Commission
P° a53 B. Resolution Concerning the MAC FAR Part 150 Study
C. Public Improvement Contracts:
PZ 1. Contract 87-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington Hills Addition -
Sanitary Sewer & Northview Park Trunk Storm Sewer
�Z�%q 2. Contract 87-10, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Nancy Cir -Streets)
• 2S(o 3. Contract 87-12, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington Sq 6th Addition/
P• n Northview Park Rd, Streets & Utilities) To be Continued to 6/2/87 Meeting
Contract 87-11, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Greensboro 2nd Addition -
Streets and Utilities
�•QL 5. Contract 87-8, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (1987 Sealcoating)
P,2Otl 6. Contract 87-26, Permit to Extend Working Hours, Wells #8 & #9
D. Private Improvement Contracts:
P, aC 3 1. Contract 85-S, Final Acceptance (Brittany 8th Add -Streets & Utilities)
3 2. Contract 85-C, Final Acceptance (Eagan Center 1st Add -Streets & Utilities)
%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: MAY 13, 1987
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION
ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE MINUTES
After approval is given to the May 19, 1987, agenda and regular City
Council meeting minutes for the May 5, 1987, meeting, the following
items are in order for consideration:
SET BOND ISSUE/1987 REFUNDING ISSUES
The Finance Committee met on Thursday, April 30, to review the
status of refunding certain bond issues that were recently evaluated
by the Director of Finance and the City's fiscal consultant, Miller
& Schroeder Financial, Inc. Since the market has changed and
interest rates have increased in the past two to three weeks, it was
suggested by the fiscal consultant and concurred by the Finance
Committee and City staff that the market be observed until May 19
and a decision be made at that City Council meeting whether to
authorize a bond sale for refunding certain issues of record. If
the market is favorable, the bond sale would call for a 45 -day
window period allowing the fiscal consultant and City to observe the
market and finalize the bond sale at a time when interest rates are
favorable. Authorization by the City Council at the meeting on May
19 would establish a date to begin the 45 -day period which is
assumed to be sometime in mid-June. The two (2) bond issues that
have appeared to be feasible are a cross-over issue which involves
the refunding of two (2) bond issues that were previously refunded
in 1985, and the Water Treatment Plant revenue bond issue of 1983.
At the last City Council meeting, the proposed refunding bond issues
were discussed and concern was raised regarding the expenses that
the City would incur if a bond sale was ordered and the market
continued to increase and the refunding sale was never authorized.
The City would incur expenses for preparation of the operating
statement, legal preparation of all sale documents and other related
costs which could range somewhere from $10,000 to $15,000 per issue.
There is no way to recover these expenses unless the bonds are
refunded at a favorable rate of interest. However, if the City
approves the refunding sale and there is a dip in interest rates
during the 45 -day period, our City would have an advantage over many
other cities in that the sale documents are ready which could pro-
vide the city with a favorable refunding issue. It is the opinion
of Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., that the rise in the interest
rates reflects a brief "bubble" in the economy and that interest
rates will be coming down in the next several weeks. Enclosed
without page number is a summary report prepared by Miller and
Schroeder.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To determine whether a bond
sale to consider the refunding of certain bond issues should be
approved or disapproved. I
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Two
(DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
A. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Item 1. Lone Oak Addition Traffic Study/Cray Addition: Cray
Research Incorporated is processing a proposed subdivision
incorporating approximately 115 acres north of Lone Oak Road and
east of Trinity Lone Oak Church in the Lone Oak Subdivision. Their
development proposal provides a phased development with an ultimate
saturation of approximately 1.2 million square feet incorporating
multiple buildings as a part of their expansion operations.
In order to provide access for this development, the planned unit
development provided for the construction of Lone Oak Drive from the
existing Lone Oak Parkway down to Lone Oak Road (Co. Rd. 26).
During the staff review of this proposed development, it was
recommended that a traffic analysis be performed to identify the
impact on County Road 26 (Lone Oak Road) and its signalized
intersection with Trunk Hwy. 149/55. Also, analysis would be
provided relating to the impact of the existing Lone Oak Parkway and
Northwest Parkway intersecting with Trunk Highway 149 just south of
I-494. It is felt that this Traffic Impact Analysis Study is
necessary to coincide any proposed improvements or upgrading of
existing facilities to coincide with the proposed phase development
of the overall Cray Addition.
In the past, the Council has indicated that the Planning Commission
does not have the authority to initiate the traffic studies
necessary for staff to provide the information to be evaluated.
Therefore, the Public Works Department is requesting Council
authorization to proceed with this study so this information can be
provided with all other staff reviews to ensure a timely processing
of this proposed development.
While limited traffic analyses were performed with the EIS and
indirect source permit application, it did not address any impact on
existing facilities associated with phase development of the
Northwest Campus or the proposed Cray Research development proposals
in addition to the Blue Ridge Addition currently being processed in
any potential future users. Also, these studies were done without
any City input or analysis and were done solely by the applicant to
fulfill other regulatory agency requirements.
The Public Works Department would like direction from the Council as
to the depth of review staff should perform in processing this
application for formal Council approval with specific conditions.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the Traffic
Impact Analysis Study incorporating the proposed Cray development
and its impact on adjacent existing facilities.
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Three
CONSENT AGENDA
There are nine ( 9) items referred to as Consent Items requiring
one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council _wishes to
discuss any of these items in further detail, the item should be
removed from the consent agenda and placed under Additional Items
unless the discussion required is brief.
PERSONNEL ITEMS
A. Personnel Items:
Item 1. Police Clerk-Typist/Resignation--The City has received a
letter of resignation from Connie Jaeger, part-time, clerk -typist/
receptionist in the Police Department. The resignation is effective
May 29, 1987.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of
Connie Jaeger, effective May 29, 1987, and to authorize a
replacement for this position.
Item 2. City of Eagan Hearing Conservation Program --Cities as
employers are required by OSHA regulations to implement and maintain
hearing conservation programs which will minimize job-related noise
exposure, monitor hearing among employees exposed to excessive
noise, and motivate employees to adopt behaviors which conserve
their hearing. The City of Eagan has contracted with the City of
Bloomington in past years to provide such a hearing conservation
program. The City of Bloomington has a fully -staffed and developed
program which provides various efficiencies and cost savings to the
City of Eagan through being able to use the city of Bloomington's
personnel, equipment, and experience. Actions which will be
accomplished in the program' include testing the hearing of City of
Eagan maintenance employees who are routinely exposed to loud noises
for an extended period of time, mechanical analysis of machinery and
conditions at the City of Eagan as required, and education of City
of Eagan personnel regarding correct actions to take when exposed to
noise. The 1987 contract amount for these services is $2,050.
These services will be performed by the Bloomington Environmental
Health and Public Health Divisions.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an agreement
between the cities of Eagan and Bloomington in which Bloomington
would provide a hearing conservation program for the City of Eagan
during 1987.
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Four
A. Personnel Items: (continued)
Item 3. Seasonal Park Maintenance Workers --After interviews, the
following persons are recommended for hire by Superintendent of
Parks V onDeLinde as Seasonal Park Maintenance Workers: Troy
Christopherson and Michael Finnegan.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Troy
Christopherson and Michael Finnegan as Seasonal Park Mainatenance
Workers.
J�
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Five
PROCLAMATION
B. Proclamation - Pause for the Pledge Observance --To commemorate
the adoption of our flag, the Congress, by a joint resolution
approved August 3, 1949, designated June 14 of each year as Flag Day
and requested the President issue an annual proclamation calling for
its observance and for the display of the flag of the United States
on all government buildings. Congress also requested the President,
by joint resolution approved June 9, 1966, to issue annually a
proclamation designating the week in which June 14 occurs as
National Flag *Week and calling upon all citizens of the United
States to display the flag during that week. In 1985 the National
Flag Day Foundation Board, through a volunteer effort that started
in 1980, organized the "Pause for the Pledge" which is a grassroots
compaign to enlist Americans everywhere to join in a pause for the
Pledge of Allegiance each year at 7:00 p.m. EDT on Flag Day.
Enclosed on page_ is a copy of a proclamation declaring
National Flag Day, June 14, 1987, and that all Eagan residents pause
at 7:00 p.m. EDT on June 14 to recite the Pledge of Allegiance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge Mayor
Blomquist's proclamation of National Flag Day for June 14, 1987.
OF
5\ya
Flag Iia Information
National Flag Day Committee
418 South Broadway
Baltimore, Maryland 21231
301 -563 -FLAG
SAMPLE PROCLAMATION
PROCLAMATION
NATIONAL FLAG DAY June 14, 1987
ion
Pause For The Pledge of Allegiance
WHEREAS, by Act of the Congress of the United States dated June 14, 1777,
the.first official flag of the United States was adopted; and
WHEREAS, by Act of Congress dated August 3, 1949, June 14 of each year was
designated "National Flag Day;" and
WHEREAS, the Congress has requested the President to issue annually a
proclamation designating the week in which June 14 occurs as National Flag
Week; and
WHEREAS, on December 8, 1982 the National Flag Day Foundation was chartered
to conduct educational programs and to encourage all Americans to PAUSE FOR
THE PLEDGE of Allegiance as part of National Flag Day ceremonies; and
WHEREAS, the President of the United States at the national ceremony held in
Baltimore, Maryland on June 14, 1985, led the Pledge of Allegiance; and
WHEREAS, the year 1987 will be dedicated to the commemoration of the Bicenten-
nial of the United States Constitution; and
WHEREAS, Flag Day celebrates our nation's symbol of unity, a democracy in a
republic, and stands for our country's devotion to freedom, to the rule of all,
and to equal rights for all:
NOW, THEREFORE, I (Your Name and Title), do hereby proclaim June 14, 1987 as
Flag Day in (Your State) and urge all citizens of (Your State) to pause at
7:00 p.m. EDT on this date for the Eighth annual PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE and
recite with all Americans the Pledge of Allegiance to our Flag and Nation.
6
A Program of the National Flag Day Foundation, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland.
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Six
ONE DAY CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY LICENSE/ST JOHN NEUMANN
C. One Day Consumption and Display License for St. John Neumann
Church --The St. John Neumann Parish is requesting a consumption and
display one -day license for a church dance that is scheduled on June
6, 1987, at the St. John Neumann Church. The non-profit
organization entitled, St. John Neumann Parish, is sponsoring the
church dance and the applicant responsible as the manager of the
event is J'm Marshall who resides at 1807 Carnelian Lane. Enclosed
on pages is a copy of the application.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE ITEM: To approve the application for
consumption and display as presented by St. John Neumann parish for
a June 6, 1987, dance.
7
CITY OF EAGAN
&M PILOT KNOB ROAD
P.O.Box211W
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 65121 CITY OF EAGAN
APPLICATION FOR CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY - ONE DAY LICENSE
Fee: oo Date Submitted: %
Reason For Event: a*)ectvAAlCe ••- . • r •N 5107:g
Date of Event:
Name of Non -Profit Organization: X - r. %, Op j Plf,-els y
A. The following' is to be cottpleted by the duly authorized officer of the
organization: rl�
1. TRUE NAME:
Last First / Full Middle
2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: 1907 ,c1�Z;it� /-•�F�C� i -,4f,) -Lr Z z
Street City State/J Zip
3. DATE OF BIRTH: J/Z `/7 4. PLACE OF BIRTH: Sr /�r4uz
iL( �
Month/Day/Year City State%
ysy-,2 y a I
S. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense?
Yes No�
If yes, explain.-
B.
xplain:B. The following is- -to be completed by the designated Chairperson/Manager
of the event:
1. TRUE NAME: �'Sf�-�- ��l7rc•E,! eCrd,�c ,.c „J D
Last J First
Full Middle
2- RESIDENCE ADDRESS: / e �j �',�cIEL ��iJ !� sl.J �� - �SJ 2z
StreetCity State Zip
3. DATE OF BIRTH:—c3/2- 4. PLACE OF BIRTH:
Mon ay Year City Stat
5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense?
Yes No�
If Yes, explain:
6. How long have you been a member of the organization?
ORGANIZATION INFORMATION:
1. Address where regular meetings are held: .0 ,30
Street City
2. Day and time of meetings: As- A'IeG l) P,6
3. Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of the State of
Minnesota?. Yes No 7
4. How long has the organization been in existence?
5. How many members in the organization? :9-000rL�eS
• g •
QAQA 000V TOXq CEAC
Consumption & Display Application
Page Two
ORGANIZATION INFORMATION (continued)
6. What is the purpose of the organization? 124
7. Officers of the Organization:
NAME ADDRESS (street/city/zip) TITLE
if /� 6 r AS ivI
JA- as re c
J)Jad 4e
8. Give the names of any other persons paid for services to the organization:
NAME ADDRESS (sreet/city/zip) n TITLE
C r-
/�� N �l '{0 3d 1-151 ay- X� /,' .o1 d
9. In whose custody are organization records kept?
_ %� h ,mss
NAME: , 1�?-' G C' Ze5 a i S ADDRESS : ate i �L�J O Z z'
Street City State Zip.
Business Telephone Number: 2.0lftome Telephone Number:
THE LICENSEE HEREBY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE CITY OF EAGAN HARMLESS FROM
ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SLITS INCLUDING ATTORNEY FEES AND OTHER DEFENSE COSTS, WHICH
THE CITY OF EAGAN MAY INCUR BY REASON OF ANY ACTIVITIES ARISING FROM THE GRANT OF
THIS ONSUMPT/ION AND DISPLAY - ONE DAY LICENSE.
and I,
Name of Event Chairperson/Manager
by submit in duplicate this application for a consumption and display - one
license in accordane with the Eagan City Code, Chapter 5, Section 5.80, and
esota Statutes.
w� . % < -
Signature -
Signature - Chairperson/Manager
FOR CITY U NLY
POLICE APPROVAL: Yes " No ( ) SIGNED DATEDV 111)
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: Yes ( ) No ( ) SIGNED
DATED
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
SALE OF OLD SQUAD AND ANIMAL WARDEN VAN
D. Sale of Squad Car and Animal Van --The City has received three
(3) bids for the sale of Squad #9. Those bidders are: 1) Viking
Auto, $1,180; 2) Curt Sisco, $1,200; and 3) Suburban Auto, $2,085.
The City has also received one bid for the Animal Warden's vehicle,
a 1979 Chevrolet 1 -ton van for $688. The bidder for the Animal
Warden van is Viking Auto.
It is recommended that the high bid for Suburban Auto in the amount
of $2,085 for the sale of Squad #9 and the Viking Auto bid for $688
for the Animal Warden van be approved.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the high bid for
Suburban Auto in the amount of $2,085 for Squad #9 and Viking Auto
in the amount of $688 for the Animal Warden van, both pieces of
equipment having been declared surplus property.
ed
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Eight
PROJECT 501, RECEIVE REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
E. Project 501, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale
Center Center Industrial Park 8th Addition - Watermain)--As a
condition of approval of the above referenced subdivision, the
developer submitted a petition requesting the installation of
watermain facilities to service the newly created lots. This report
has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for
their consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to be held
on J une 16.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Feasibility
Report for Project 501 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th
Addition - Watermain) and schedule public hearing to be held on June
16, 1987.
PROJECT 503, RECEIVE REPORT,/''ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
F. Project 503, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 8th
Addition - Streets and Utilities) --In response to a petition
received from the developers of the proposed Windtree 8th Addition,
the Council authorized the preparation of the Feasibility Report for
the installation of streets and utilities within the Windtree 8th
Addition. This report has now been completed and is being presented
to the Council for consideration of scheduling a formal public
hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Feasibility
Report for Project 503 (Windtree 8th Addition - Streets and
Utilities) and schedule public hearing to be held on June 16, 1987.
PROJECT 449, RECEIVE -REVISED" REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
G. Project 449, Receive "Revised- Report/Order Public Hearing
(Country Club Market - Driveway Improvement) --On July 16th, 1985, a
public hearing was held to discuss proposed improvements to the
private driveway adjacent to Country Club Market. Although written
objections were received from Country Club Market at that hearing,
Council closed the hearing and authorized the installation of
project.
Because of the majority of the improvements were proposed to be
constructed on private property, continuous negotiations were held
to try and proceed with the approved project.
Most recently, representatives of Country Club Market indicated that `
they would resist any attempt to proceed with this project due to
their feeling that the majority of the improvements were the
responsibility of other property owners.
/I
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Nine
As a result of additional investigation regarding ownership and
access for the private drive, the staff prepared a "revised"
Feasibility Report to be reconsidered at a new public hearing. This
new public hearing is necessary because of proposals to levy
assessments against property owners not originally identified in the
public hearing process during 1985.
This report has now been completed and is being presented to the
Council in consideration of scheduling a new formal public hearing
to be held on June 16, 1987.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Feasibility
Report for Project 449 "Revised" (Country Club Boulevard and
Driveway Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on
June 16, 1987.
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Ten
APPROVE FINAL PLAT/CARBONE'S ADDITION
H. Approve Final Plat for Carbones' Addition --We have received an
application for final plat approval for the Carbone's Addition
located north of Yankee Doodle Road and wsst of Unisys and indicated
by the final plat map enclosed on page _'t
All conditions placed
on the preliminary plat approval gra ted by Council action on
October 21, 1986, have been complied with. All final plat
application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and
found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for
the Carbones Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute all related documents.
/3
CARBONES ADDITION
r L~ Oak Neal
A QC ALlO H
'
lt0 I
a�tiA
AM
ROAD to
Denote
repast O.NII A.N
( set 4
• NM
Seo bn 9, Tw;L27, R91.23
11
The South lot
— VICINITY MAP
I Sou►h.e,t phi
e&suotd fo h:
M &*cows IN
f o ,w is
grim w Fier
-
f d9'I!•06'E 130.00
—r--&--&— DENOTES -Right or A
DENOTES •Designaled
I -
I = r.s.
lip
p�
v + sl in
co
� I
a«
—J i
A _ Y
�� •K 13000 i
2
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD) $
S COUNTY ROAD NO. 28 fI��s�.
f 1P
_
Ndg'Rlbs'w 13000 —
COUNTY
I DAKOTA—
ROAD H)UHT • OF -WAY MAP NO. s
a
L
COUVTY ROAD NO 28
M.M Lw ee 9' of [ iF of im
of .«INF /— — — — — — — — —
EXHIBIT -"A7
SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Eleven
APPROVE FINAL PLAT/GREENSBORO 2ND ADDITION
I. Approve Final Plat, Greensboro 2nd Addition --We have received an
application for final plat approval for the 2nd addition of the
Greensboro development located north of Wescott Road about a quarter
mile east of Lexington Avenue as identified by the plat
configuration contained on page. All conditions of the
original preliminary plat approved by Council action on February 18,
1986, has been complied with. All final plat application materials
have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for
favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for
Greensboro 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute all related documents.
l5
X
LU
.4. U
-.11" 0.1
to]
jo,
%;
.4 L"
LLJ
Ij
IL
Ljj
cr_
n'6\0Z
LLI ................
20
t
iii!
I
LO
Et
A
If
Ilk
.4. U
-.11" 0.1
to]
jo,
%;
.4 L"
LLJ
Ij
IL
Ljj
cr_
n'6\0Z
LLI ................
20
t
iii!
I
.4. U
-.11" 0.1
to]
jo,
%;
.4 L"
LLJ
Ij
IL
Ljj
cr_
n'6\0Z
LLI ................
20
LO
Et
.4. U
-.11" 0.1
to]
jo,
%;
.4 L"
LLJ
Ij
IL
Ljj
cr_
n'6\0Z
LLI ................
20
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twelve
PROJECT 498/STAFFORD PLACE
A. Public Hearing for Project 498, Stafford Place - Streets and
Utilities --In response to a petition submitted by the developers of
the Stafford Place and surrounding properties, the Council
authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was
presented to the Council on April 21 with a formal public hearing.
being scheduled for May 19. Enclosed on pages throughis a
copy of the feasibility report that was reviewed in detail ith all
major developers affected by this proposed project at a special
meeting held on Thursday, May 7.
Our consulting engineer will be discussing in detail the proposed
improvements identified under this project and will be available to
answer any questions that may arise during the public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 498 (Stafford Place - streets and
utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed
plans and specifications and acquisition of all easements and
rights-of-way through condemnation and/or negotiation as may be
necessary.
/7
Yj
REPORT
I
STAFFORD PLACE / HIGH SCHOOL SITE
(NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD & BRADDOCK TRAIL)
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT No. 498
FOR
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1987
FILE No. 49417
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
Bonestroo, Rosene, A.nderlik & Associates, Inc.
2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers & Architects
St. Paul, MN 55113
612-636-4600
April 27, 1987
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Stafford Place/High School Site
(Northview Park Road & Braddock Trail)
Street and Utility Improvements
Project No. 498 - File No. 49417
Dear Mayor and Council:
Orin G. Bonestruu. P.E.
Ruben W. Rusene, P.E.
Joseph C. Anderlik, Y.E.
Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E.
Richard E. Turner, P.E.
Jumes C. Olson, P.E.
Glenn R. Cook, P.E.
Keith A. Gordon, P.E.
Thomas E. Noyes. l'.E.
Richard W. Faster, Y.E.
Robert G. Schunicht, P.E.
Marvin L. Suraalu, P.E.
Donald C. Burgurdi, P.E.
Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E.
Murk A. Hanson, P.E.
TM K. Field. P.E.
Micharl T Routmunn, P.E.
Robert N. PJiJJrdr. P.E.
David O. Luskuiu. P.E.
Thomas W'. Hversun, P.E.
Michael C. Lynch, P.E.
Karen L. Willis, P.E.
James R. Muland, P.E.
Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E.
Keith A. Bachmann. P.f.
Murk R. Rolls, Y.E.
Robert C. Ruuek, A.I.A.
Tharnus E. Angus, P.E.
Scott L. Young, P.E.
Charles A. Erickson
Leo M. Puwebky
Harlan M. Olson
Susan M. Eberlin
Enclosed is our report for Stafford Place/High School Site, Project No. 498.
This report covers utility and street improvements and includes a preliminary
assessment roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
jayider the laws of t/h, Sta a of innesota.
Approved by�:
PP ./
Department of Public Wks. *lark A. Hanson
Date: /-/- �;' ' -
Date: April 27, 1987 Reg. No. 14260
3370e
lJ�
SCOPE: This project. provides for the construction of Northview Park Road and
Braddock Trail to serve Stafford Place and the future high school and middle
school site. Also included is the construction of sanitary sewer, water main,
and storm sewer within the street rights-of-way to serve the abutting proper-
ty. Stafford Place includes approximately 180 lots on 80 acres. The future
high school and middle school site located west of Stafford Place is included
on approximately 95 acres.
Northview Park Road and Braddock Trail are designated as neighborhood col-
lectors and are designated as Municipal State Aid Streets in the City of
Eagan. Therefore, the plans and specifications for street surfacing will be
prepared in accordance with Municipal State Aid Standards and will be submit-
ted to Mn/DOT for their review and ultimate approval.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOM'.4ENDATIONS: The project as outlined herein is feasible
from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility
and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out
as two contracts. Contract I would include the construction of all utilities
and the grading of Northview Park Road west of Braddock Trail. Contract II
would include the street surfacing of Northview Park Road and Braddock Trail.
The plans and specifications for Contract II will be prepared in accordance
with Municipal State Aid Standards and be submitted to the State Aid Office
for their review and approval.
DISCUSSION:
Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes the westerly exten-
sion of the proposed trunk sanitary sewer in Northview Park Road to be con-
structed under Project 494 serving Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge Additions.
The trunk sanitary sewer extension will serve Stafford Place and the unplatted
property on the north side of Northview Park Road. The high school and middle
Page 1.
3370e
vv
school site will be served by the existing sanitary sewer located at the north
westerly corner of their property. It is also proposed to extend this
existing sanitary sewer easterly in Northview Park Road approximately 660'.
This sanitary sewer will serve the property north of Northview Park Road and
the land approximately 660' east of the Lexington Square Additions. It is
assumed the sanitary sewer required in Braddock Trail to serve the abutting
residential lots in Stafford Place will be constructed privately.
Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a 16" trunk main
in Northview Park Road and an 8" water main in Braddock Trail. The 16" main
at the westerly end will connect to the proposed 16" main to be constructed in
Northview Park Road under Project #485 as part of Lexington Square 6th
Addition. At the easterly end the 16" main will connect to proposed 16" main
to be constructed ..under Project 491 as part of the Bridle Ridge and Stone
Bridge Additions. The 8" main in Braddock Trail will connect to the existing
20" trunk main in County Road 30 located on the south side. Also required is
the construction of a pressure reducing station on the 8" main which crosses
the high and intermediate pressure zone. The location of the pressure
reducing station is shown on the drawing located at the back of this report
and is intended to maintain the southwesterly portion of Stafford Place and
the high school and middle school facility in the high pressure zone. Also
included is the required number of valves, hydrants and water stubs for
proposed and future connections.
Services - Services are proposed to be constructed to the 10 lots in Stafford
Place fronting Northview Park Road. Services are proposed to be 4" for sani-
tary sewer and 1" for water. It is assumed the services in Braddock Trail
will be constructed privately.
Page 2.
3370e 4
y
Storm Sewer - Storm sewer is separated into four systems as follows:
1.) Braddock Trail Storm sewer proposed in Braddock Trail includes two sep-
arate leads shown on the attached drawing. The storm sewer will convey runoff
from both the high school/middle school site and Stafford Place. Each storm
sewer system will be extended into Stafford Place to be extended privately as
part of the required improvements for Stafford Place.
2.) West End Northview Park Road - Storm sewer proposed in the west end of
Northview Park Road is shown on the attached drawing. Two detention areas are
included in the storm sewer design which each provide approximately 1 acre-
feet of storage. The storm sewer system in the west end of Northview Park
Road will discharge into Pond JP -20.
3.) East End Northview Park Road - Storm sewer proposed in the east end of
Northview Park Road will convey runoff from all of Stafford Place and the
northerly side of Northview Park Road east of Braddock Trail. Also included
is a storm sewer stub to provide for the future outlet of Pond JP -53.
4.) Pond JP -20 Outlet - The proposed outlet for Pond JP -20 includes a gravity
storm sewer extended from the southeasterly side of Pond JP -20 connecting to
the proposed storm sewer in Bridle Ridge. It is recommended the outlet be
constructed at the time due -to the westerly storm sewer system in Northview
Park Road discharging into Pond JP -20.
STREET: Street construction proposed herein includes the surfacing of North -
view Park Road from the east property line of the Lexington Square Addition to
the Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge Additions and Braddock Trail from County
Road No. 30 to Northview Park Road. Also included is the grading of Northview
Park Road from Braddock Trail to the east line of the Lexington Square 6th
Addition. It is assumed the grading for the remaining portion of Northview
Park Road and all of Braddock Trail will be done jointly by the developers of
Page 3.
3370e
�v
Stafford Place, Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge. Northview Park Road from
Braddock Trail to the Lexington Square 6th Addition is proposed to be 44' wide
with parking provided on both sides while the easterly portion will be 36'
wide with parking provided only on the south side. An 8' wide bituminous
trail is proposed on the south side. Braddock Trail is to be constructed 36'
wide (parking provided on east side only) from Northview Park Road to the most
southerly entrance to the High School/Middle School site. The remaining
section to County Road No. 30 will be constructed 48' wide which will provide
for two southerly lanes (left and right turn lane) onto County Road No. 30 and
one northerly lane. A parking lane will be provided on the east side. An 8'
wide bituminous trail will be provided on the west side along the high
school/middle school site outside of the public right-of-way in an easement.
EASEMENTS: Easements will be required for the westerly half of Braddock Trail
and those portions of Northview Park Road which will not be platted as part of
Stafford Place. It is anticipated these easements will be acquired at not
cost because the properties are controlled either by developers or the school
district. However, condemnation maybe required to acquire the right-of-way
for Northview Park Road within Parcel 010-01 which is approximately 1.4 acres
including permanent and temporary easements.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
ASSESSMENT AREA
E 1/2, SECTION 23
Parcel 010-01
Parcel 010-02
Parcel 010-03
Parcel 010-04
Parcel 010-75
Parcel 010-76
Parcel 010-77
W 1/2, SECTION 24
Parcel 010-50
Page 4.
3370e
COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at
the back of this report and are summarized as follows:
CONTRACT I
Sanitary Sewer $ 245,090
Water Main 332,080
Services 12,600
Storm Sewer a. Braddock Trail 40,050
b. West End Northview Park Road 112,590
c. East End Northview Park Road 147,430
d. Pond JP -20 Outlet 17,530
Grading 40,690
TOTAL CONTRACT I ................ $ 948,060
CONTRACT II
Northview Park Road (Lexington Square 6th Addition to
Braddock Trail) $ 151,850
Northview Park Road (Braddock Trail to Bridle Ridge/
Stone Bridge) 189,590
Braddock Trail (Co.Rd. No. 30 to Northview Park Road) 240,580
TOTAL CONTRACT II ............... $ 582,020
TOTAL CONTRACT I AND II ......... $1,530,080
The total estimated project cost for Contract I and II is $1,530,080 which
includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs
associated with right-of-way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are es-
timated at 259 and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond inter-
est.
Page 5.
3370e ��
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re—
port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs.
The assessments will be spread over 15 years. The interest rates will be
based upon the bond sale issue used to finance this project.
SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary sewer proposed herein is considered trunk. There—
fore, it is proposed to assess those areas benefiting from the trunk sanitary
sewer their related trunk area assessment. In addition, it is proposed to as—
sess those lots and parcels abutting the trunk sewer in Northview Park Road
the lateral benefit from trunk rate in accordance with the City of Eagan Fee
Schedule for 1987.
WATER MAIN: Water main in Northview Park Road is considered trunk. There—
fore, it is proposed to assess those areas benefiting from the trunk water
main their related trunk area assessment. In addition, it is proposed to as—
sess the abuting lots and parcels 50% of the lateral benfit from trunk rate
per front foot except for those lots in Stafford Place which obtain direct
service from the trunk :Hain where it is proposed they be assessed 100% of the
lateral benefit from trunk rate per front foot. The school property is con—
sidered commercial and will be assessed the full commercial rate. The water
main in Braddock Trail will be assessed equally against Stafford Place and the
school property, based on 1/2 the total cost of the 8" main in Braddock Trail
excluding the pressure reducing station which is considered trunk.
SERVICES: Services are proposed to be assessed entirely against the abutting
lots they serve.
STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is separated into three parts as
previously discussed. Each part is further separated into trunk and lateral.
3370e Page 6.
Trunk area storm sewer is proposed to be assessed on an area basis in accor-
dance with the City of Eagan 1987 Fee Schedule to those parcels shown on the
attached drawing.
a. Braddock Trail - The storm sewer in Braddock Trail is considered lateral
and is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis. Basically, it is pro-
posed the cost be shared equally between the high/middle school site and Staf-
ford Place.
b. West End Northview Park Road - This storm sewer is considered lateral and
is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis to the abutting property it
serves.
c. East End Northview Park Road - This storm sewer is considered trunk and is
proposed to be assessed at the lateral equivalent assessment rate in accor-
dance with the City..of Eagan Fee Schedule for 1987.
d. Pond JP -20 Outlet - This storm sewer is considered trunk and is not pro-
posed to be assessed.
STREET: It is proposed to assess Northview Park Road and Braddock Trail on a
front foot basis based on the calculated assessment rate presented in Appendix
C. However, because the unplatted property and specific lots in Stafford
Place will not have direct driveway access it is proposed to assess these par-
cels 50% the residential equivalent rate presented in Appendix C. Those lots
which have direct driveway access in Stafford Place will be assessed the full
residential equivalent rate. The school property will be assessed the full
cost to construct one-half the street for both Northview Park Road and Brad-
dock Trail. The grading of Northview Park Road from Braddock Trail to Lexing-
ton Square 6th Addition will be assessed on a front foot basis. The school
property will be assessed 75% of one half the total cost of grading due to its
3370e Page 7.
public facility zoning while the unplatted property to the north will be as-
sessed 50% of one half the total cost of grading due to its proposed residen-
tial use.
TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates established in 1987 City of
Eagan Fee Schedule proposed to be assessed as part of this project are as fol-
lows:
Sanitary Sewer
Trunk Area
Lateral Benefit from Trunk
Water Main
Trunk Area - Commercial/Public Facility
Trunk Area - Residential
100% Lateral Benefit from Trunk - Residential
50% Lateral Benefit from Trunk - Residential
100% Lateral Benefit from Trunk - Commercial/
Public Facility
Storm Sewer
Trunk Area - Commercial/Public Facility
Trunk Area - Residential
Equivalent Assessment Rate
Page 8.
3370e .;�-,
$1,300.00/Ac.
$15.06/F.F.
$3,170.00/Ac.
$1,250.00/Ac.
$12.47/F.F.
$ 6.24/F.F.
$20.55/F.F.
$0.079/Sq.ft.
$0.053/Sq.ft.
$10.30/F.F.
REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed below:
Project
Cost Revenue Balance
SANITARY SEWER
Trunk
$245,090
Trunk Area Assessment
Lateral Benefit from Trunk
$ 12,600
Lateral Assessment
$245,090
WATER MAIN
$ 12,600
Trunk
$233,970
Lateral
98,110
Lateral Assessment
152,640
Trunk Area Assessment
Lateral Benefit from Trunk
$ 82,030
120,630
$202,660
-$ 42,430
$ 98,110
111,242
79,563
$288,915 -$ 43,165
$ 12,600
$ 12,600
$326,655
201,462
$317,600 $528,117 +$210,517
STREET
Street $622,710
Street Assessment $362,406
$622,710 $362,406 -$260,304
TOTAL BALANCE -$135,382
The anticipated project deficit is -$135,382. The deficit for street will
be financed in part with Municipal State Aid funds while the deficit for sani-
tary sewer and water main will be financed by the major utility funds.
Page 9.
3370e
$332,080
SERVICES
Lateral
$ 12,600
Lateral Assessment
$ 12,600
STORM SEWER
Trunk
$164,960
Lateral
152,640
Trunk Area Assessment
Lateral Assessment
$ 82,030
120,630
$202,660
-$ 42,430
$ 98,110
111,242
79,563
$288,915 -$ 43,165
$ 12,600
$ 12,600
$326,655
201,462
$317,600 $528,117 +$210,517
STREET
Street $622,710
Street Assessment $362,406
$622,710 $362,406 -$260,304
TOTAL BALANCE -$135,382
The anticipated project deficit is -$135,382. The deficit for street will
be financed in part with Municipal State Aid funds while the deficit for sani-
tary sewer and water main will be financed by the major utility funds.
Page 9.
3370e
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans and Specifications
Open Bids/Award Contract
Construction Completion
Final Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due w/Real Estate Taxes
Page 10.
3370e '
April 21,'87
May 19,'87
June,'87
July, '87
Oct. '87
Spring, '88
May, '89
April 21,'87
May 19,'87
Fall, '87
Spring, '88
Summer,'88
Fall,'88
May,'89
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITE
(NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD & BRADDOCK TRAIL)
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 498
CONTRACT I
A. SANITARY SEWER
1,260 Lin.ft. 10" Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $40.00/lin.ft.
2,710 Lin.ft. 8" Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft.
16 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each
160 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. in pl. @ $70.00/lin.ft.
30 Lin.ft. 8" Outside drop @ $120.00/lin.ft.
10 Each 8"x4" wye in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
100 Lin.ft. 4" riser in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft.
100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization in pl. @ $10.00/cu.yd.
3,970 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
Total Construction
+5% Contingencies
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................
Page 11.
3370e
$ 50,400
97,560
16,000
11,200
3,600
600
2,400
1,000
3,970
$186,730
9,340
$196,070
49,020
$245,090
B. WATER MAIN
4,010
Lin.ft.
16" Water main in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft.
$120,300
3,000
Lin.ft.
8" Water main in pl. @ $16.00/lin.ft.
48,000
80
Lin.ft.
Jack or auger 8" water main @ $120.00/lin.ft.
9,600
500
Lin.ft.
6" Water main in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft.
7,000
12
Each
Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each
12,000
3
Each
16" Butterfly valve & box @ $1,200.00/each
3,600
5
Each
8" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $500.00/each
2,500
10
Each
6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $350.00/each
3,500
22,810
Lbs.
Fittings in pl. @ $1.00/Lb.
22,810
1
Each
8" Pressure reducing station @ $10,000.00/each
10,000
2
Each
Connect to existing water main @ $500.00/each
1,000
1
Each
Wet tap 8" DIP to ex. 20" DIP @ $1,500.00/each
1,500
100
Cu.yds.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
1,000
10,200
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
,10,200
Total Construction
$253,010
+5% Contingencies
12,650
$265,660
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
66,420
TOTAL WATER MAIN ................................ $332,080
Page 12.
3370e
C. SERVICES
550
Lin.ft.
4" Sanitary sewer service @ $6.00/lin.ft.
$
3,300
650
Lin.ft.
1" Water service @ $7.00/lin.ft.
18"
4,550
10
Each
1" Curb stop & box @ $80.00/each
Lin.ft.
800
10
Each
1" Corporation stop @ $30.00/each
3
300
650
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
2,700
650
Each
Std.
Total Construction
$
9,600
6
Each
+5% Contingencies
CB w/cstg. in pl. @
480
4,800
800
Lin.ft.
$
10,080
800
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
Total
2,520
$ 30,510
TOTALSERVICES .................................
$
12,600
D. STORM SEWER
a. Braddock Trail
610
Lin.ft.
21"
Storm sewer in pl. @
$28.00/lin.ft.
$ 17,080
50
Lin.ft.
18"
Storm sewer in pl. @
$24.00/lin.ft.
1,200
140
Lin.ft.
15"
Storm sewer in pl. @
$22.00/lin.ft.
3,080
3
Each
Std.
MH w/cstg. in pl. @
$900.00/lin.ft.
2,700
1
Each
Std.
CBMH w/cstg. in pl.
@ $850.00/each
850
6
Each
Std.
CB w/cstg. in pl. @
$800.00/each
4,800
800
Lin.ft.
Mechanical
trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
800
Total
Construction
$ 30,510
+5%
Contingencies
1,530
$ 32,040
+25%
Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
8,010
TOTAL STORM SEWER (Braddock Trail) ............. $ 40,050
Page 13.
3370e � �i
b. West End Northview Park Road
560
Lin.ft.
24"
Storm sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft.
$ 20,160
750
Lin.ft.
18"
Storm sewer in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft.
24,000
580
Lin.ft.
15"
Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft.
16,240
7
Each
Std.
MH w/cstg. in pl. @ $1,600.00/each
11,200
7
Each
Std.
CB w/cstg. in pl. @ $800.00/each
5,600
1
Each
24"
Flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each
800
3
Each
15"
Flared end w/trash guard @ $600.00/each
1,800
24
Cu.yds.
Rip
rap in place @ $50.00/cu.yd.
3,090
LUMP
SUM
Clear
& grub trees @ $1,000.00/L.S.
1,000
1,890
Lin.ft.
Mechanical
trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
1,890
Total
Construction
$ 85,780
+5%
Contingencies
4,290
$ 90,070
+25%
Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
22,520
TOTAL STORM SEWER (West End Northview Park Rd.) ... $112,590
c. East End Storm Sewer
1,010
Lin.ft.
42"
Storm sewer in pl. @ $66.00/lin.ft.
$ 66,660
260
Lin.ft.
36"
Storm sewer in pl. @ $46.00/lin.ft.
11,960
610
Lin.ft.
15"
Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft.
13,420
6
Each
Std.
6' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $2,000.00/each
12,000
8
Each
Std.
CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each
6,400
1,880
Lin.ft.
Mechanical
trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
1,880
Total
Construction
$112,320
+5%
Contingencies
5,620
$117,940
+25%
Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
29,490
TOTAL STORM SEWER (East End Storm Sewer) ......... $147,430
Page 14.
3370e i�.�
d. Pond JP -20 Outlet
550
Lin. ft.
12" Storm sewer in pl. @ $20.00/lin.ft.
$ 11,000
1
Each
Control MH w/cstg. @ $1,200.00/each
1,200
1
Each
12" Flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each
400
4
Cu.yds.
Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd.
200
550
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
550
Total Construction
$ 13,350
+5y Contingencies
670
$ 14,020
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
3,510
TOTAL STORM SEWER (Pond JP -20 Outlet ............. $ 17,530
e. Street Grading
LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $1,000.00/L.S. $ 1,000
12,000 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $2.00/cu.yd. 24,000
2,0.00 Cu.yds. Subgrade excavation @ $3.00/cu.yd. 6,000
Total Construction $ 31,000
+5y Contingencies 1,550
$ 32,550
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 82140
TOTALSTREET GRADING ............................. $ 40,690
Page 15.
3370e 2�
CONTRACT II
STREET SURFACING
A.) NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD (Lexington Square 6th Addition to Braddock Trail)
8,600
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation (street) @ $0.40/sq.yd.
$ 3,440
1,820
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation (trail) @ $1.00/sq.yd.
1,820
500
Cu.yds.
Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd.
1,500
300
Cu.yds.
Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd.
1,800
5,200
Ton
Class 5 aggregate base (street) @ $5.00/ton
26,000
680
Ton
Class 5 aggregate base (trail) @ $6.00/ton
4,080
1,400
Ton
Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton
15,400
700
Ton
Bituminous wear course (street) @ $18.00/ton
12,600
175
Ton
Bituminous wear course (trail) @ $18.00/ton
3,150
125
Ton
Bituminous material for mixture @ $160.00/ton
20,000
400
Gals.
Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.00/gal.
400
3,300
Lin.ft.
B518 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft.
16,500
20
Each
Adjust utility structure @ $150.00/each
3,000
4.0
Acres
Seeding w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac.
6,000
Total Construction
$115,690
+5Y Contingencies
5,790
$121,480
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 30,370
TOTAL........................................... $151,850
Page 16.
3370e 3L/
!I
B. NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD (Braddock Trail to Eagan Hills Farm)
10,300
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation (street) @ $0.40/sq.yd.
$ 4,120
2,700
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation (trail) @ $1.00/sq.yd.
2,700
500
Cu.yds.
Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd.
1,500
300
Cu.yds.
Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd.
1,800
6,300
Ton
Class 5 aggregate base (street) @ $5.00/ton
31,500
1,000
Ton
Class 5 aggregate base (trail) @ $6.00/ton
6,000
1,600
Ton
Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton
17,600
800
Ton
Bituminous wear course (street) @ $18.00/ton
14,400
260
Ton
Bituminous wear course (trail) @ $18.00/ton
4,680
150
Ton
Bituminous material for mixture @ $160.00/ton
24,000
450
Gals.
Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.00/gal.
450
4,740
Lin.ft.
B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft.
23,700
30
Each
Adjust utility structure @ $150.00/each .
4,500
5.0
Acres
Seeding w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac.
7,500
Total Construction
$144,450
+5Y Contingencies
7,220
$151,670
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
37,920
TOTAL...........................................
$189,590
3370e
Page 17.
U
C. BRADDOCK TRAIL (Co'. Rd. 30 to Northview Park Road)
13,300
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation (street) @ $0.40/sq.yd.
$ 5,320
3,300
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation (trail) @ $1.00/sq.yd.
3,300
600
Cu.yds.
Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd.
1,800
400
Cu.yds.
Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd.
2,400
8,100
Ton
Class 5 aggregate base (street) @ $5.00/ton
40,500
1,200
Ton
Class 5 aggregate base (trail) @ $6.00/ton
7,200
2,050
Ton
Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton
22,550
1,025
Ton
Bituminous wear course (street) @ $18.00/ton
18,450
340
Ton
Bituminous wear course (trail) @ $18.00/ton
6,120
190
Ton
Bituminous material for mixture @ $160.00/ton
30,400
600
Gals.
Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.00/gal.
600
5,930
Lin.ft.
B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft.
29,650
30
Each
Adjust utility structure @ $150.00/each
4,500
7.0
Acres
Seeding w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac.
10,500
Total Construction
$183,290
+5% Contingencies
9,170
$192,460
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
48,120
TOTAL...........................................
$240,580
Page 18.
3370e 77
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITE
(NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD & BRADDOCK TRAIL)
PROJECT NO. 498
A. SANITARY SEWER
a. Lateral Benefit from Trunk
Parcel
Description
Total
E 1/2,
SECTION
23
Parcel
010-01
(Govern.
Trust)
Parcel
010-03
(Govern.
Trust)
Parcel
010-03
(School)
390
Parcel
010-04
(Govern.
Trust)
Parcel
010-04
(School)
14,608
Parcel
010-02
(Sienna)
760
Parcel
010-02
(School)
15.06
Parcel
010-02
(Stafford
Place)
Parcel
010-75
(Sienna)
Parcel
010-75
(Stafford
Place)
W 1/2, SECTION 24
Parcel 010-50
Parcel 010-50 (Bridle Ridge)
TOTAL
b. Trunk
Parcel Descri tion
SE 1/4, SECTION 23
Stafford Place (010-75)
TOTAL
Area
Acres
Assessable
Total
Footage
Rate/F:F.
Assessment
740
$15.06(1)
$ 11,144
280
15.06
4,217
720
15.06
10,843
390
15.06
5,873
700
15.06
10,542
970
15.06
14,608
230
15.06
3,464
760
15.06
11,446
490
15.06
7,379
490
15.06
7,379
1,960 $15.06
280 15.06
8,010
Assessable
Credit Area Rate/Ac.
$ 29,518
4,217
$120,630
Total
78.9 Street 20% 63.1 $1,300(1) $ 82,030
$ 82,030
(1) Assessment Rate from "City of Eagan Fee Schedule."
Page 19.
3370e ,
B. WATER MAIN
a. Lateral Benefit from Trunk
E 1/2, SECTION 23
Parcel
010-01
(Govern.
Assessable
740
Total
Parcel
Descri2tion
010-03
Footaee
Rate/F.F.
Assessment
NORTHVIEW PARK
ROAD
Parcel
010-03
(School)
W 1/4,
SECTION
24
14,796
Parcel
010-04
Parcel
010-50
390
1,960
$ 6.24(1)
$ 12,230
Parcel
010-50
(Bridle Ridge)
280
6.24
1,747
E 1/2, SECTION 23
Parcel
010-01
(Govern.
Trust)
740
$ 6.24
$ 4,618
Parcel
010-03
(Govern.
Trust)
280
6.24
1,747
Parcel
010-03
(School)
720
20.55(1)
14,796
Parcel
010-04
(Govern.
Trust)
390
6.24
2,434
Parcel
010-04
(School)
Place)
700
20.55
14,385
Parcel
010-02
(Sienna)
Place)
970
6.24
6,053
Parcel
010-02
(School)
230
20.55
4,727
Parcel
010-75
(Sienna)
490
6.24
3,058
Parcel
010-75
(Stafford
Place)
290
6.24
1,810
Parcel
010-02
(Stafford
Place)
760
12.47(1)
9,477
Parcel
010-75
(Stafford
Place)
200
12.47
2,494
BRADDOCK TRAIL
E 1/2, SECTION 23
Parcel
010-02
(Stafford
Place)
150
$17.09(2)
$ 2,564
Parcel
010-02
(School)
150
17.09
2,564
Parcel
010-75
(School)
620
17.09
10,596
Parcel
010-75
(Stafford
Place)
670
17.09
11,450
Parcel
010-77
(Stafford
Place)
890
17.09
15,210
Parcel
010-75
(Stafford
Place)
1,160
17.09
19,824
Parcel
010-77
(School)
2,100
17.09
35,889
TOTAL
5,740
$177,673
(2) Assessment rate equals 1/2 the cost to construct the 8" water main in Brad-
dock Trail. `
Page 20.
3370e _? /
b. Trunk Area
Area Credit
Parcel Description (Ac.) (Ac.)
E 1/2, SECTION 23
Parcel 010-01 31.2 Pond 2.2
Street 20%
Parcel 010-02 (Sienna) 34.6 Pond 1.6
Street 20%
Parcel 010-02 (Stafford
C. SERVICES
Parcel Description
Stafford Place (010-75, 010-02)
D. STORM SEWER
a.) Lateral
1.) Braddock Trail
E 1/2, SECTION 23
Parcel Description
Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place)
Parcel 010-77 (Stafford Place)
Parcel 010-75 (School)
Parcel 010-77 (School)
No. of
Services
10
Assessable Total
Area Rate/Ac. Assessment
23.8 $1,250(1) $ 29,750
26.4 1,250
1.9 1,250
0.9 3,170(1)
29.3
1,250
Place)
2.4
Street
20%
Parcel
010-02
(School)
1.1
Street
20%
Parcel
010-75
(Stafford
Place)
36.6
Street
20%
Parcel
010-75
(Sienna)
1.3
Street
20%
Parcel
010-75
(School)
2.1
Street
20%
C. SERVICES
Parcel Description
Stafford Place (010-75, 010-02)
D. STORM SEWER
a.) Lateral
1.) Braddock Trail
E 1/2, SECTION 23
Parcel Description
Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place)
Parcel 010-77 (Stafford Place)
Parcel 010-75 (School)
Parcel 010-77 (School)
No. of
Services
10
Assessable Total
Area Rate/Ac. Assessment
23.8 $1,250(1) $ 29,750
26.4 1,250
1.9 1,250
0.9 3,170(1)
29.3
1,250
1.0
1,250
1.7
3,170
Assessable
Footage
1,830
890
620
2,100
5,440
Page 21.
3370e eZA
Tv
Cost/Service
$1,260
Rate/F.F.
7.36
7.36
7.36
33,000
2,375
2,853
36,625
1,250
5,389
$111,242
Total
Assessment
$ 12,600
Total
Assessment
$ 13,472
6,552
4,565
15,461
$ 40,050
Parcel Description
2.) West End Northview Park Road
E 1/2, SECTION 23
Parcel 010-01 (Govern. Trust)
Parcel 010-03 (Govern. Trust)
Parcel 010-03 (School)
Parcel 010-04 (Govern. Trust)
Parcel 010-04 (School)
Parcel 010-02 (Sienna)
Parcel 010-02 (School)
3.) East End Northview Park Road
E 1/2, SECTION 23
Parcel 010-02 (Stafford Place)
Parcel 010-02 (Sienna)
Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place)
Parcel 010-75 (Sienna)
W 1/2, SECTION 24
Parcel 010-50
Parcel 010-50 (Bridle Ridge)
Assessable Total
Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment
740
$34.22
$ 25,324
280
34.22
9,582
720
34.22
24,640
390
34.22
13,347
700
34.22
23,955
230
34.22
7,871
230
34.22
7,871
3,290
$112,590
Page 22.
3370e �V
760
$10.30(1)
$ 7,828
760
10.30
7,828
490
10.30
5,047
490
10.30
5,047
1,960
$10.30
$ 20,188
280
10.30
2,884
4,740
$ 48,822
Page 22.
3370e �V
b. Trunk Area
Street 20%
Parcel 010-02 (Stafford
Place)
Area
Credit
Assessable
Rate/
Total
Parcel
Description
010-02
Sq.ft.
Sn..ft.
Area
Sq.ft.
Assessment
E 1/2,
SECTION
23
010-75
(Sienna)
56,630
Street
20%
Parcel
010-01
(Sienna)
1,672,700
Pond 336,000
1,069,360
$0.053(1)
$ 56,676
Street 20%
Place)
3,266,120
Parcel
010-02
(Sienna)
1,868,720
Pond 182,950
1,348,620
0.053
71,477
Street 20%
Parcel 010-02 (Stafford
$326,655
Page 23.
3370e
Place)
104,540
Street
20%
83,630
0.053
4,432
Parcel
010-02
(School)
47,920
Street
20%
38,340
0.079(1)
3,029
Parcel
010-75
(Sienna)
56,630
Street
20%
45,300
0.053
2,401
Parcel
010-75
(Stafford
Place)
3,266,120
Street
20%
2,612,890
0.053
138,483
Parcel
010-75
(School)
91,480
Street
20%
73,180
0.079
5,781
Parcel
010-03
(Govern.
Trust)
16,400
Street
20%
13,120
0.053
695
Parcel
010-03
(School)
310,300
Street
20%
248,240
0.079
19,610
Parcel
010-04
(Govern.
Trust)
31,600
Street
20%
20,220
0.053
1,072
Parcel
010-04
(School)
295,100
Street
20%
236,080
0.079
18,650
Parcel
010-77
(Stafford
Place)
76,400
Street
20%
61,120
.0.053
3,239
Parcel
010-76
48,000
Large Lot
203940
0.053
1,110
$326,655
Page 23.
3370e
E. STREET
Assessable Total
Parcel Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment
NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD
E 1/2, SECTION 23
W 1/2, SECTION 24
Parcel
010-50
= $6.22 (50%
1,960
$11.40
$ 22,344
Parcel
Parcel
010-01
(Govern.
Trust)
740
$17.62(3)
$ 13,039
Parcel
010-03
(Govern.
Trust)
280
17.62
4,934
Parcel
010-02
(Stafford Place)
150
$11.40
Parcel
010-03
(School)
(School)
720
55.35(4)
39,852
Parcel
010-04
(Govern.
Trust)
390
17.62
6,872
Parcel
010-04
(School)
11.40
700
55.35
38,745
Parcel
010-02
(Sienna)
46,761
230
17.62
4,053
Parcel
010-02
(Sienna)
740
11.40 (5)
8,436
Parcel
010-02
(School)
230
55.35
12,731
Parcel
010-02
(Stafford
Place)
760
22.81
17,336
Parcel
010-75
(Stafford
Place)
290
22.81
6,615
Parcel
010-75
(Stafford
Place)
200
11.40
2,280
Parcel
010-75
(Sienna)
490
11.40
5,586
W 1/2, SECTION 24
Parcel
010-50
= $6.22 (50%
1,960
$11.40
$ 22,344
Parcel
010-50
(Bridle Ridge)
280
11.40
3,192
(5)
Assessment Rate
= $11.40 (50%
Residential Equivalent Rate).
(6)
$186,015
BRADDOCK TRAIL
2 - 2,870 F.F.).
Parcel
010-02
(Stafford Place)
150
$11.40
$ 1,710
Parcel
010-02
(School)
150
41.91(6)
6,287
Parcel
010-75
(School)
620
41.91
25,984
Parcel
010-75
(Stafford Place)
670
11.40
7,638
Parcel
010-75
(Stafford Place)
2,050
22.81
46,761
Parcel
010-77
(School
2,100
41.91
88,011
$176,391
(3)
Assessment Rate
= $6.22 (50%
Grading) + $11.40 (50% Residential Equivalent
Rate).
(4)
Assessment Rate =
($151,850 -
2 - 1,650 F.F.) + $9.33 (75% Grading).
(5)
Assessment Rate
= $11.40 (50%
Residential Equivalent Rate).
(6)
Assessment Rate
= $240,580 _
2 - 2,870 F.F.).
Page 24.
3370e ��
.. In
co
.r
n-+
aO
n
n
co
n
Go
n
M
•% n
a
J
n
`p
..
N
GO
N
.O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
uN1
M
M
�
n
.7
� :
O
•y
O .•••
a,
a
•O
M
O`
N
M
d
M
co
In
J N
N
O
O
J
M
wn
Ln
N
a
co
N
.y
Ln
Ln
' a
a
Ln
N
N M
OD
Ir
�
•j
V1
n
n
oD
U
M
u -n
a
M
J
M
n
a
n
Y1
Go
-e
J
•O
N
O
a
u
ao
u
m
NN
-+
a
a
CO
N
O
a
n
M
W
r+
Go O
OO n
O
M
a
^�
tiIT
w
.7
n .4
N N
M
a
co
a
co
N
n
u
O
u%
♦D n
n in
•"I
M
_
lot
ar
O
�7
V1
N W
WN M
n P•
�t v�
u
a 1
N
N
uI
M
In
J
a
O
O
V1
W
M
M M
n
✓1
J
M
N
v1
I
co
Go
M
a
O
O a
OD
w
n
n
J
v7
M
Go
O
M. J
O
W
rnn
ry (,.
►. C
.•�
r•+
'n
.+
°°
M
ra
r•, O
.+ O
ran
r
.N.
e•+
.� a
.Nr
cn
O
O H
O H
O
Ger
O
O
O
O
O
O w
N
O w
O
H
O
O '-+
10 w%
N
O
O
a
co
rr
n
.r
N
M
a
O
�O •D
O
•O
•O
O
M
rl
J
J
J
J
N
--'
•O
a
a
oo
M
.1
•O
a u
a
O
GG
M
.--i
w%
OG
.r
.••+
J
u
u
n
M
J
M
•••� J
�r1
N
O
M
u
d
n
.•�
n
ti
X
y
n
n
co
n
Go
n
M
N
GO
J
O
N
O
J
O
•+
M
O
O
O
O
C
M
n
In
n
W%
W
•o
�o'
O
O
O
O
a
0 a,
O
a,
M
+7
rl
n
O
N
Ln
Ln
' a
a
Ln
N
N M
OD
Ir
�
•j
V1
n
n
oD
U
M
u -n
a
M
J
M
n
a
n
Y1
M
.•+
N
•O
N
u
ayr
u
yr
NN
a
CO
W
W
W
r+
Go O
OO n
a
^�
Ln
w
.7
n .4
N N
M
a
co
a
co
a
n
u
O
Irl N
♦D n
n in
•"I
M
_
lot
M
O
�7
V1
N W
WN M
n P•
�t v�
u
n
7
O
•O
M
In
J
O
1
O
I
.•1
M 10
W
M
.r
p
7
n
I •O
n
1 b
n
1
N
v1
I
v1 A
I a
D.
U
a
O
vs
.1
X
y
a
O
ant
M
n
n
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
M
M
•o
�o'
O
O
O
O
O
0 a,
O
M
a
O
O
•n
Ln
Ln
' a
a
Ln
a0
O
M
n
N
n
oD
U
M
O
N
M
•O
a
a
a
N
Y1
M
.•+
N
•O
N
u
U
u
yr
NN
a
CO
W
W
W
r+
Go O
OO n
a
.O
M
w
.7
n .4
r -i J
M
a
co
a
co
a
-n
W%
O
Irl N
♦D n
M 11+
n
M
N
lot
M
O
O
•n
N W
WN M
n P•
•O
d
n
7
O
•O
M
N
1 V1
0 P'1 �--�
O
1
O
I
.•1
•••1
n
1
M
.r
p
7
n
I •O
n
1 b
n
1
N
v1
I
v1 A
I a
D.
U
O
O
.1
O
O
•N.
W
ra p
ry (,.
►. C
.•�
r•+
N
.+
.-•�
M
ra
r•, O
.+ O
ry O
.+
w
e•+
.� a
,4 u.
cn
O
O H
O H
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O w
N
O w
O
H
O
O '-+
VO
•r1
.•1 >
r1 >
N>
co
r4
N
N
r•
N
14
.4 Co
.+ W
N W
N
9*
J n
M
M
N
J
a 0
w O
W
a
10
a
J —
n
J
.1
•O
a u
a
O
n
a H .a
n
N
OG
OG
Ln
J
u
u
•O
M
J
M
•••� J
�r1
O
O
M
u
d
n
.•�
n
N
W
W
W
W
a
O
ant
M
n
n
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
0 a,
F
F
F
.0
F
' a
a
_
M
U
U
u
U
U
.4
•.I
a
a
a
N
u
U
u
NN
a
CO
W
W
W
a
M 11+
n
u1
N
•n
N W
WN M
n P•
•O
O
O
O•O
cc
►�
F
O F
1
O N
1
O F
1
O
1
O
I
O
1
n
I
n
1
p
1
n
I
p
7
n
I •O
n
1 b
n
1
H
.1U-+
v1
I
v1 A
I a
D.
U
O
O
.1
O
O
•N.
W
ra p
ry (,.
►. C
.•�
r•+
N
.+
.-•�
.•+
ra
r•, O
.+ O
ry O
.+
w
e•+
.� a
,4 u.
cn
O H
O H
O H
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O w
O w
O w
O
H
O
O '-+
VO
•r1
.•1 >
r1 >
N>
N
r4
N
N
r•
N
14
.4 Co
.+ W
N W
N
.+
N •'C,4 O
1,• 1+
a 0
a 0
w O
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a u
a u
a u
a
N
a
a H .a
�G U
j
u (9
u U
u C:J
U
u
u
U
U
u j
u
U u1
u u)
U Nu
U
u
p, W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
W
W
W
wW
s
a
a E•
a
O
ant
M
APPENDIX C
CALCULATED ASSESSMENT RATE
A.) GRADING - Northview Park Road (Lexington Square to Braddock Trail)
Total Grading = $40,690
Assessable Footage = 3,270
Rate/F.F. = $12.44
50% Rate/F.F. = $6.22 (Single Family)
75% Rate/F.F. = $9.33 (Public Facility)
B.) STREET SURFACING
Rate/F.F.
a) Residential
Equivalent Rate (32'
wide street)
2
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation
@ $0.40/sq.yd.
$ 0.80
0.04
Cu.yds.
Subgrade correction @
$3.00/cu.yd.
0.12
0.03
Cu.yds.
Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd.
0.18
0.73
Ton
Aggregate base Cl. 5,
(6" thick) @ $5.00/ton
3.65
0.16
Ton
Base course mixture,
W-2" thick) 2331 @ $11.00/ton
1.76
0.16
Ton
Wear course mixture,
(VV thick) @ $12.00/ton
1.92
0.0176
Ton
Bituminous mat'l. for
mixture @ $160.00/ton
2.82
0.086
Gals.
Bituminous mat'l. for
tack coat @ $1.00/gal.
0.09
1
Lin.ft.
B618 concrete curb &
gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft.
5.00
0.00069
Acre
Restoration @ $1,500.00/Ac.
1.04
3370e
$17.38
5% Contingencies 0.87
$18.25
+25% Legal,'Engrng.; Admin. & Bond Interest 4.56
TOTAL........................................... $22.81
Page 26.
K
41
■. Iii �111111�1��
fir► +mss #l��1/ ►�
STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITE ®ONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK
SANITARY SEWER & ASSOCIATES. INC.
Engineers do Architects
CITY PROJECT No. 498 St. Paul, Minnesota
Date: 4/87 LFIG. 1
EAGAN; MINNESOTA Comm. 49417
WESCOTT
ROAD
I6A
.l a B"DIP—
a
D �;I MIDDLE/, GH SCO
010- a
SIl'E
Ir
1\1 VIII/1�11��
010-.o L010...1 1
Ex. l "DIP
PROPOSED 0,
WATER MAIN O
oto -S4
PROPOSED PRESSURE
REDUCING STATION
24Sa
`"•� � �.... ....i -f ; 010-55 011-56 012-58 on -.a
BRA DDOC TR. 010-76IFF EY
R
N Ex. 20" DIPri
D
ESSMENT LEGEND
J "•" �'`" LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK
r Nil}IORM
TRUNK AREA WATER MAIN
STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITE BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK
WATER MAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineers do Architects `
CITY PROJECT No. 498 St. Paul, Minnesota
Date: 4/87 �I^� A
EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49417 �7 C
WAMI"m
3RTH I W
#,i ucr tee#
ZK
V -N JP -21
I STORM 18'
SEWER
r:EA6AN 18Y OTHERS
MIDDLE/HIGH SQA
�L/ ofo r fNi
21'
I
■
o1n-xT
;PROPOSED
MEAGAN HILLS:
FARMS STORK
42° 1
42'f
uy:���a� ola••sl,
G^"*--�FLITURE
STORM
JP -53 SEWER C
010-54
OIO-53 'Off -Si 012 -SB
IFF
- r . • ■IIIA ��: ��11�11
TRAIL
��Ir�►,► - --
ASSESSMENT LEGEND
:;;.."'.`"= TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER
STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITEN 80NESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK
do ASSOCIATES, INC.
STORM SEWER Engineers & Architects
St. Paul, Minnesota
CITY PROJECT No. 498
Date: 4/87 F1G. 3
EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49417
� 1►� /IIIIII�����
■
Ola -E0
8' BITUMINOUS
TRAILWAY
010-55 1 a1-54
01Q -EI O
OHO
O
010-54
50
012-W OII-sa
010-76 IFF EY
B' BITUMINOUS R AD
N TRAILWAY
ASSESSMENT LEGEND
— — STREET 81 TRAILWAY
STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITE BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK
do ASSOCIATES. INC.
STREETS Engineers & Architects
St. Paul. Minnesota PROJECT No. 498
Date: 4/87 FIG. "
EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49417
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirteen
VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENTS/NORWEST 2ND ADDITION
B. Public Hearing for the Vacation of Utility Easements, Norwest
2nd Addition (Continued from May 5, 1987, City Council Meeting) --On
April 7, the Council received a petition requesting the vacation of
a utility easement identified by the map enclosed on page_. The
public hearing was then scheduled to be held on May 19. All notices
were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially
affected utility companies. As of this date, the staff has not
received any objections to this proposed vacation.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny the vacation of utility easement over Norwest 2nd
Addition as described.
�d
-------------
P .. ....
%
...... I lli7vel
100
4,
t .'
0
1.0
a
c /
- ----- 0 117.71
;.9 4 -N.0622
21.
23
K Aa t" ul
X
O -W R
fa NI o
Qb
0
------- 120.00
"MO922101W
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE
VACATED IN LOT 1,. BLOCK 1, NORWEST -2ND ADDITION, DAKOTA
COUNTY, -.MINNESOTA.
The existing public utility and drainage easement over the
'e'of Lot 1, Block 1',
west 29-00 feet of the east 81-00 feet
NORWEST 2ND ADDITION, as platted and recorded, Dakota County,
Minnesota.
. ;`:\�.,5 :,\�\ W__ -„�' �' /1^�&aim/ /1 J/�//•//.n/�/i!`rl /�O Y
46G
(COUNTY STATE A.10
HIGHWAY INO-
31)
0 T K
N.. 0 8
R 0
A
D
I-N.0022123,W.
-W
Waier mala II
W-
W
al rCo#ch basirt
w-898.75
-7
-
I foskcaum-rr STATE -90AID -"J416I1W4Y Ha 3))
t!
rr 98 "as.s
1
Al.
to
PILOT
—4 IMP
ROAD
tptq,
th-e
11 ;k'
is , T.p 9mas
. . M. 834.95
q:
d-.
W*
-------------
P .. ....
%
...... I lli7vel
100
4,
t .'
0
1.0
a
c /
- ----- 0 117.71
;.9 4 -N.0622
21.
23
K Aa t" ul
X
O -W R
fa NI o
Qb
0
------- 120.00
"MO922101W
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE
VACATED IN LOT 1,. BLOCK 1, NORWEST -2ND ADDITION, DAKOTA
COUNTY, -.MINNESOTA.
The existing public utility and drainage easement over the
'e'of Lot 1, Block 1',
west 29-00 feet of the east 81-00 feet
NORWEST 2ND ADDITION, as platted and recorded, Dakota County,
Minnesota.
. ;`:\�.,5 :,\�\ W__ -„�' �' /1^�&aim/ /1 J/�//•//.n/�/i!`rl /�O Y
46G
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
PROJECT 482/NANCY CIRCLE
C. Public Hearing for Project 482, Nancy Circle - Streets --On
December 2, 1986, a public hearing was held to discuss the
improvement of Nancy Circle cul-de-sac and the installation of a
related storm sewer facility. At that hearing, representatives of
the neighborhood indicated that the estimated cost contained in the
feasibility report was not acceptable. Subsequently, the Council
continued the public hearing until such time that more refined cost
estimates could be obtained through a competitive bid process based
on final detailed plans and specifications.
Enclosed on page JrJ is a letter that was sent to the property
owners informing of this continued public hearing with the revised
cost estimate based on th formal bice opening held on April 24.
Also enclosed on pages A14 A is a copy of the original
feasibility report for th Council's information and review during
this continued public hearing. Our consulting engineer will be
available to discuss the project in detail and answer any additional
questions that may arise.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 482 (Nancy Circle - streets and storm
sewer).
S'y
_ � S
4 -
IIIA �
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
May 7, 1987
Re: Project 482, Nancy Circle Street Improvements
NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - MAY 19, 1987, 7:00 P.M.
Dear Property Owner:
BEA BLOMQUIS1'
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
VAC ELLISON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
THOMAS HEDGES
City Administrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
On December 2, 1986, a public hearing was held before the City Council to
consider street improvements to Nancy Circle incorporating concrete curb and
gutter, additional gravel base with bituminous surfacing and storm sewer
facilities to handle the drainage as identified by the enclosed drawing. At that
time a representative for the area expressed concerns regarding the estimated
cost of $5,462 per lot for these improvements.
Based on those reservations, the Council continued consideration of authorizing
the project until firm competitive bids could be received from various
contractors.
As a result of a competitive bid opening based on detailed construction design
quantities, this "estimated" cost has been reduced to $4,606 per lot. The low
bid was submitted by the contractor who is presently performing the reconstruc-
tion of Nicols Road in front of your subdivision. Subsequently, it is doubtful
that the upgrading of Nancy Circle would ever be able to be performed any cheaper
in the future than through this proposal.
Therefore, this letter is to inform you that these proposed improvements will be
formally discussed at the continued public hearing by the City Council on May 19,
1987, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The Council would like
to hear every property owner's position regarding these revised estimated con-
struction costs before making their decision to proceed or cancel this proposed
project. If for some reason you are =unable to attend this continued public
hearing, it is requested that your written comments be received at City Hall no
later than Friday, May 15, 1987, so that they can be forwarded to the Council for
their review and consideration prior to the May 19 meeting.
If you have any additional or specific questions regarding this project that you
would like to have answered prior to the May 19 meeting, please feel free to
contact Mark Hanson, who prepared the feasibility report and design drawings at
636-4600, or myself at 454-8100.
Sincerely,
I'a "111V
omas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
TAC/jj
Enclosure THE LONE OAK TREE_ THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
REPORT
FOR
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT No. 482
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
FILE No. 49402
BONES'TROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSODIATE$, INC..
ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS.
ST. PA.UL.. MINNESOTA.'
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc.
Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E.
G/eanR. Cook, P.E.
-
Robert W. Rower. P.E.
Keith A. Gordon, P.E. ... .
Jwrph C. Anderlik, Y.E.
Thom" E. Noyes, P.F.
Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E.
Richard W. Fasirr, P.E.
2335 W. Trunk Highway wa 36
9 Y Engineers & Architects
Richard E. Turner. P.E.
James C. Olson, P.E.
Robert G. Sehunichr, P.E.
Marvin L. Sarvale, P.E.
St. Paul, MN 55113
Donald C. Bursardr, P.E.
612.638.4600
Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E.
Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
Ted K. Fkld, P.E.
Michael T. Routmann, P.£.'
Robert R. Pfefferk, P.E. .
October 22, 1986
David O. Laskura, P.E.
Thomas W. Peterson. Y.E..
Michael C. Lynch, P.E.
Kann L. Willis, P.E.
Honorable Mayor and Council
James R. Maland. P.E.
Kenneth P. Anderson. P.E.
City of Eagan
Keith A. Bachmann, P.E.
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Mark R. Rolls, P.£. •-
Robert C Russek, A.LA.
Eagan, MN 55122
ThimusE.Anitus.P.F.
-
Sms L. younr. P.E.
Charks A. Erickson
Re: Nancy Circle
Lea M. Pawrlsky
Street Improvements
Harlan M. Olson
Susan M.Ebedin
Project No. 482
Our File No. 49402
Dear Mayor and Council:
Enclosed is our report for Nancy Circle, Project No. 482. This report" covers
street improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
B05STR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that .._
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer,
under the laws of th State of Minnesota.:
L Mark A. Hanson
Date: October 22, 1986 Reg. No. 14260
..
Approved by: { { o
epartment of Public Works
Date :,/,r -L
0117e
30 Year
SCOPt: This project proviaes.for street improvement of Nancy Circle.east of
Nichols .Road within Tousignant's First Addition. The proposed improvement
would include upgrading Nancy Circle to City of Eagan residential street stan-
dards with concrete curb and gutter and bitu:ainous paving. Nancy Circle is
abutted by six single family, platted parcels.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible -from an engineering
krl-,
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plan for the City of
Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract.
DISCUSSION: Nancy Circle is an existing 26' wide gravel .street ending in an
approximate 35' radius cul-de-sac. Water main and sanitary sewer for Nancy
Circle were installed under the 1971,.City Improvement Project No. 64. In 1979
storm sewer was installed east of Tousignant's First Addition with a' catch
basin manhole located as indicated on Figure 1.
For this project, it porposed to upgrade Nancy Circle to a 28' wide bi-
tuminous street and 40' radius bituminous cul-de-sac with concrete curb and
gutter. In addition, it is proposed. to construct a catch basin and storm
- :r c;�tc: _ 7
sewer line from the east end of the cul-de-sac to the existing catch basin
manhole.
It .is assumed, for purposes of this report, that the existing aggregate
base is .not of sufficient depth and cross -section -to be fully utilized in the
a.. -
til
upgrading of! the street. Minor excavation of the street will be required to
-d
bring it to proper elevation and cross section. Therefore, we have estimated
installation of an additional 4+ inches of aggregate base along with a minor.
amount of common excavation required for curb installation. However,:: as part:..
.of the preparation of' the plans 'and specifications, a more detailed analysis.
will be accomplished to better evaluate the depth and cross section of the ex-
isting aggregate base.to determine the amount of additiona base required. `
Page 1.
0117e /
'• it Y' ,
EASEMENTS: A 10' storm sewer easement along with a temporary construction
easement will be required over either lot 3 or 4 depending on where the storm
sewer is located.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
Assessment and Construction Area
Lots 1-6, Block 1, Tousignant's First Addition
COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at
the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $32,770 which
includes contingencies and all related overhead but no easement acquisition
costs. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering,
administration and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
properties. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located
at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final costs.
The assessments will be spread over a period of 15 years. The interest rate
will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment
hearing. It is proposed to assess the project costs equally on a per lot
basis to all lots within Tousignant's First Addition.
REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are esti-
mated to be as follows:
Project Cost Revenue Balance
Street Assessment $32,770 $32,770
TOTAL ................ $33,770 $32,770 - 0 -
All costs for this project are proposed to be assessed; therefore, there
are no funds required from the major street fund.
Page 2.
0117e
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report November 6, 1986
Public Hearing December 2, 1986
Approve Plans and Specifications Winter, 1987
Open Bids/Award Contract Spring, 1987
Construction Completion Summer, 1987
Final Assessment Hearing September, 1987
First Payment -Due with Real Estates Taxes May, 1988
Page 3.
0117e ��
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 482
LUMP
SUM
Clear & Grub @ L.S.
$ 200
150
Cu.yds.
Common Excavation,@ $5.00/cu.yd.
750
50
Cu.yds.
Subgrade correction @ $5.00/cu.yds.
250
1
Each
Catch basin @ $900.00/each
900
80
Lin.ft.
12" RCP Storm Sewer @ $35.00/lin.ft.
2,800
1
Each
Cut -in to existing CBMH @ $300.00/each
300
300
Ton
Class 5 Aggregate Base (streets) @ $7.00/ton
2,100
50
Ton
Class 5 Aggregate Base (driveways) @ $10.00/ton
500
90
Ton
2331 Bituminous Base Course @ $13.50/ton
1,215
90
Ton
2341 Bituminous Wear Course @ $14.50/ton
1,305
11
Ton
Bituminous Material for Mixture @ $180.00/ton
1,980
50
Gals.
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat @ $1.50/gal.
75
550
Lin.ft.
B618 Concrete Curb & Gutter @ $6.00/lin.ft.
3,300
130
Sq.yds.
6" Concrete Driveway @ $30.00/sq.yd.
3,900
130
Sq.yds.
2" Bituminous Driveway @ $12.00/sq.yd.
1,560
1
Each
Adjust G.V. Box @ $75.00/each
75
1,400
Sq.yds.
Sod w/topsoil @ $2.00/sq.yd.
2,800
TOTAL
$24,010
+5% Contingencies
1,200
$25,210
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
1 7,560
TOTAL.............................................
$32,770
Page 4.
0117e . 14;
Total `
Parcel Description
No. Lots
Rate/Lot Assessments
..Tousignant's First Addition
Lots 1-6, Block 1
.6
$5,462 $32,770:
r
•
f
'
4
• Y}'i^5v k�jSK
�f
•
Y t,
1
b
_
• _ •° Lis
• ,Y
Page 5.
0117e
r^
t 2:
5" t
z TCUSIGNANT'S ISt ADD.
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No. 482
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
J
BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK
& ASSOCIATES, INC. ;
Engineers do Architects
St. Paul, Minnesota
Date: Oct. 86
Comm. 49402 Fig• NO.
l�
..•
•tis
��.
2
3
r'=100'
I
PROPOSED
STOR
SEWER
I
A
r --EXISTING
I
I
NANCY CIRCLE
I 42' STORM
I SEWER
i
i
off,
�r
t
i
A
I
1
I
PROPOSE
STREET IM
ROVEMENT
I
8618 CONCRETE
CURB
S GUTTER
I
30' BACK 10
BACK
6
5
4
z
w
..
z TCUSIGNANT'S ISt ADD.
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No. 482
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
J
BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK
& ASSOCIATES, INC. ;
Engineers do Architects
St. Paul, Minnesota
Date: Oct. 86
Comm. 49402 Fig• NO.
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Fifteen
STREET NAME CHANGE/TOWN CENTRE DRIVE
D. Street Name Change, Town Centre Drive --The City Engineering
Division has received numerous complaints from Public Works
Maintenance, Building Inspection, and Police Department personnel
regarding the confusion associated with the street name designation
within the Town Centre 100 subdivision. Subsequently, it is
recommended that the Council give serious consideration to renaming
the portion of present Town Centre Drive as identified by the map
enclosed on page6.�3 to one of several names recom ended for
consideration by the Letter of Notice enclosed on page.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve changing the name
of a portion of Town Centre Drive to an acceptable alternate.
W
o T/
ICROSSRO
�aoti
O J
Y
:j - ilvrxvvmi r 1.
4 - FOREST RIDGE T j
5 - IRONWOOD LN.
67',REDWOOD PT.
YANKEE DOODLE
Co. Rd.
O'LEA R Y P,
go
w
Q
0
z
x
Lu
J
81 iF)
BLUE JAY* rWAY
i�
CT
LICK]
CIR.
I_
)LSTAD vR�y�N
LA.
)LAA
DE141ZARK
:1,�AFr-W,,,)C T E .
n
0
0
3
M
0
co
c LANE
JAY W
kY�'V
ALcON W
Q c
3 �
r
Q CP
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor
PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
MC ELLISON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
May 11, 1987 THOMAS HEDGES
City Administrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
Re: Street Name Change - Town Centre Drive
On May 19, 1987, the Eagan City Council will hold a public hearing
to consider changing the name of portions of Town Centre Drive.
Names for consideration are as follows:
Vernon Place
Martin Drive
Town Centre East
Town Centre West
Metro Drive
Commercial Park Drive
Crossroad Boulevard
Town Centre Place
Input from the public will be heard at 7:00 p.m. in regard to the
above. Any interested individuals who have concerns relating to
this item are urged to attend.
Sincerely,
V'clhi'aqel P. oe schstant City En4L
gineer
MJF/jj
Enclosure
cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner
Arnie Erhart, Street Supervisor
Pat Geagan, Administrative Captain
Doug Reid, Chief Building Official
Sue Sheridan, Utility Billing Clerk
Deanna Kivi, Special Assessment Clerk
Ken Southern, Fire Chief
Joe Connolly, Utility Supervisor
�i
THE LONE OAK TREE. .THE SYMBOL OF S RENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Sixteen
PROPOSED LAKESIDE PARK IMPROVEMENTS
A. Approve Plans for Lakeside Park, Contract 87-1, Park
Improvements --At the April 21, 1987 City Council meeting, several
residents from the Lakeside Estates neighborhood appeared under
visitors to be heard and presented concerns regarding the proposed
park improvements to Lakeside Park. After hearing discussion by the
residents, it was determined by the City Council that a hearing
should be held before the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
to determine whether residents representing the Lakeside Park
neighborhood desire the proposed improvements or the park left as a
passive parkland. The City Administrator sent a notice to
approximately (80) property owners residing in both Lakeside Estates
and South Oaks Additions, notifying those residents of the May 7
APRC meeting. A copy of the notice is enclosed on page -66--
At the APRC meeting the City Administrator presented background
information on the action that transpired at the April 21 City
Council meeting, the status of the project and a history of the park
planning process that developed the master plan and also proposed
improvements to Lakeside Park. The Director of Parks and Recreation
followed a 15-20 minute presentation by the City Administrator by
explaining the concept of a neighborhood park and also more
specifically the proposed improvements for Lakeside Park.
There were a number of residents present and after expressing
opinions, concerns, objections and support, the APRC is again
proposing that Lakeside Park be approved according to the Park
Master Plan with one modification that the backstop for the proposed
neighborhood ball diamond be reduced in size to more clearly reflect
use by children.
Enclosed on pages (p % through %3 is a copy of a letter that
was submitted by D ug and Lind�Dahl, a letter from Carleton
Peterson and a petition signed by.approximately 60 persons residing
in the area. The petition signed by the 60 + residents is in
support of the proposed improvements.
It was explained to the residents present at the APRC meeting that
the public hearing was to be held that evening and that the
recommendations of the APRC would be considered by the City Council
at the May 19 meeting. The residents were told at the APRC meeting
that it would be advantageous for the neighborhood to have a
spokesperson both representing the opposition and support if they
wish to comment at the City Council meeting of May 19.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the plans
as approved and recommended by the APRC for Lakeside Park_ and
defined as Contract 87-1.
6�
April 24, 1987
Dear Property Owners Residing in the Lakeside
Estates and South Oaks Additions:
In official action that was taken at a regular City Council
meeting held on Tuesday, April 21, 1987, the proposed parkland
improvements for Lakeside Estates Park, located on Atlantic Hills
Drive, was directed back to the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission to allow reconsideration of development plans.
The next regular meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission is Thursday, May 7, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. The location
is the City Council chambers of the Eagan Municipal Center
Building. A presentation will be made by a member of the City
staff that outlines the proposed parkland improvements.
Following the staff presentation, the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission will entertain public comment from
residents located within the Lakesides Estates parkland
neighborhood which includes both the Lakeside Estates and South
Oaks Additions.
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
and recommendation to the Eagan City Council
the future development status of the Lakeside
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
TLH/jeh
will make.a findings
that will determine
Estates Park.
"Yq _ a t x- terra ! ,rte ��'ev a,-_, 64,-
�c-�-,u,,.c� a.� ��,c�lc./ (i�Gc.,e,� � Ga-�.cc,!✓ G�.c.�- 7�'�`
.4-/- A�Lv-
.3, y��P c� a' �,,�� � cam►^-�.�. y�:�
�r✓ ✓Z�� Lc�-vii/ f�/ !%�•fi-Cc- j�c.
cam-
.Q- LAzz
�,�;e�-rte- �• �z.�..��. ,/� � a��..� �.--�-�� c�-� .lam
.,.�.� �-c•e �-� .,� c�.�e-f�.�� .mac-�.� ��,c..Fi �...� c�
67
`7�-►c..L a� JQ�fcy�,c.� �cZ,Ce,GZu� - a..,.u11 Gt. Gu-su��...� d�iL�C��G ..0.d
I 1, '�_' _ , . . .1
A II
!tA
W."113
'ePlf �4 W
Eagan,PJAM
11
-;'.J'',
Lpril,.
IM4 it i MOI "I
V
m Hedges t I'AN MIA
Mr. To' "H 1 V P W "g
ges,i, MI
LIP.
40
31
'N
R
r t
pq;z�✓-Z v,
Tom
.1,
All' J�M
PIA0 h M A�
t
0
lowing Up t 'd u
WY Y"ITMIIZ!�
Vt
p
that -'d
Ogee.hav j�t�n� t e
r us I -�`lhav
tar
r I camb."to. .start In Eagan
t,:_YoU,L,
,estopped ' by"', --s eve ra.L,;,- ,are so' busy that,.j!,drb idon't
P71ns"�'
oda s` we
A M 4,kir Ak
n J�p4i
"'i V
aga
1� with you.,,: ,,One -`bf."th6se'�d,
,work--�I ao will I :,.hope a
-,izo'.Eaga"$ _,V611iad 'the'' go""
o.,-Iunch h 4 Aq
! Vil
10, ZAY
,When ;we, moved Mast Y) od f or �'une 0
n .%,-LcL " July]
;
ui lg� on a b " understand
S
tan
bi 'idin Lakeside e lot "In La esi p Estates
A �!!Ii " . L " Contemplating
',1, - " beautiful"
11 ",
ontemp ating'developing'�Lakeslde Park ,,khIch"i "' ne' a r!
,our
OM6L
"To that ss' t 6 1 a
discussion 1',.woul&:LI:ike�. tb"' aii my -� ;two cents. espe
j6 fi,;:. add'
my 7, :for :Thu�rsday �:evening)
Ah P, `be`a�.A e-meeting��66h
�since cannot
scheduled
A&.
strategy o `E 'r
deliberate.
agan egar JjgLparks has impressed me
k?", ',OoThat-As i-noney;Was AniiI a Ily ,
spen 't
o" purchase many"Jclmos t"Yexcess
' land and'th6nt " ''deve'lop ol sIowlybut :'"surely.VB6b
""A dFexguson at
as
ng., me';about a
m,,personally. pleasedthat ",Z&kes ide � is 0 your ;agenda i �,f
mprovements '3Y�Al though ' 'J"mpr' ' "
'i Iessive now, ".. t
:,has .,even,.grpaip'r ,p;
-!";'think., most. days'--:' Vo 6
u ora 'walk , , ''In t and
ff I a 6 '-at" home ..Co.�.suggest Aha
•ok 'out on i-`w6uidl Ike - -
. , � ., j �.., � ."I.- t would 1� .1 -, 111�1, %,...
la'n submitted as"".',"a''n"a'lternc-itl�7"'b; h ",kea
Ae,ig..bors'�
Ist nc";.I its,'and, : 1,vy I :�j
u ,
merits
,hope'.- pl' 7
aving, tour Tl-child�re'�n"'�',"�'I'two ,of
1 71 .whom are,,:rezk .y., n o,,t,spor
a 1.�base
ore -pass We, ,plan is,,
t z,,now;'
h'i n g t
n�;two ,;weeks L'Ait.i4il'l.',�i�,hAiqg'e,,to.,�soccer.:',,�4Tnen
",'rA`,,Ic'irg a'kea'�!� other.�'AhAn"-It",,
00,t_ 611 6.
V a a" b 1 e'.iurn ';'*. t`� -6` ' ' , ' 'a"I 1;,� � - - ' - 'f J'
0 ,-th'ds6.
options�
wills,rea, 1yse
rve" us
although Yfhe '"IdP'"'
,apcording"..'
N list along with
9,roppings
e -paths 'and the hard court . I r di 1. , as'k-ei"
i h `t',` h'
quar4pi}y,etc.really�has,mer slbe•yond'a one,:,spor p an
A
ee ..,,so ny. trees
.nice,:�.and :'.hatdr 1be t' 'sca'rred "'TJ,
a _ au v �.
t e n t 1 a
2g
in g
hay.' 'my, ri.g. N
t
y has
P. 0,4
hi hkthe
ill;i,is Ah
:ome -�,rall
Y ),p'.'J' s'')
sentl
le
A`-
W,
1 -my
'I'Mough .
.; 1t.I�"f'l0
,;true '. t"ha"t"eVen"'u"nde"isI-z-
a'
1. o tbaAl I
ac,i
Ir6bably:getused"byAdults because "ofthe deaith"""t.„playing f 2
upport the alternative because., -best does what
par 11 k e "a
•,
y.
re meant lAo'd serves t he' most
.1 Y . __
""IRTi, OU lendi
44.4
Carleton {D �r<Pe
J,
1
`C,�o�venant Deyelo
t,.suppor ,would ,.be_.,`aat
' ' r
'' '' '
ppecl
Sir I
a
4,
el
We, the undersigned, hereby agree with the prepozed
improvements to Iakeside Park including a blacktop
play area, more playground equipment, a blacktop trail
through the park, picnic tables, benches, and a backstop
for -playin- ball.
UY-7
\DA
�►� 6/8- Erie Coc-A14
%
70
} L
` 0., �... t'Y.:�,."%u ;.v.., r np,,.. Vii`.. 9..,.'%}5. +; ♦�t�K-,a' ..-0F�d++a'tf. 1'EG _A.'•1.4.,+Y:. r- '�. nt+. tG.z.:x"�� ..,.-'St_. x.
y t ,:,-.•�si'1�`Y'' 7 �x ice"' Z r•'�'s #z;f fti e. 1
r e, the uridert�i®ned, hereby a, ee with tke proposed
W
rr �; imnrovementz to Lakeside park includin- a blacktop
play area, .ore 'playgxsund equipment, a blacktep trail
' ! �` .L � k4 r .Po ryT �Ji• .. ..
through'. the park, picnic ,tables, benches, and a backstop
w h r `y , r�' for playing ball.
0A /I//%}fZ� JY_ L/ -
6Yv.
S.
fi 7 4
Y t �a x .fnZa w ♦,t• , f� IC n r "(,
c ,Lt
_
�dy.y.lfp f.w M 3v
•�.Lr�. ,Y{-f{�r'�"r�•°i,•a� �$�. �j usd'w�aro
rt T r� �X�r z/' � �£ � i m t .tl,a .�y Y1•.. �5 ��x�: 'u •'•"+T'ar
xl3 z�.se v � t fy hr � � •�' i d}„c •y ^.° .
+. ?t•!,} :-'+,.� rr t• '� °' ai a.-.
r +
�t{5�:S x n {* sem- •i N s�`r-s.5, r P'" f,•i..,+�f
33
x' i a �; .,# s.'..•Ga•�6 V
{ J � �P � � Yv� ix +{ �# �• V " �( �CJ..�I ��1./' /"ice %� �� // • r/ I �/ �' �
7 -
� r���}t.�• .� � i ry, � ash s t -tr � /
R M
F
t _ 5t 4 7 gy L ,�Y ,,i ��� / �'x 1. � 4r+F �stii e�'vw,��zr?iy 9=f �t4c.*. �.'�:: :ta�rK�y'�v"g4'.�„ y-, 5•I� }Y? � � +K . Z �t ��"`r�'4.30,2�� '`fid x "'y,,.'e•L,�a. - ;,; a!Le3:t`,'��il�`;:
' ,.t ,:y, ..y- r - ° i �, .� w^ :. .5 ..c ,ii'` „r �a1 h_'�•.,(•-. �.,y,,. : �+.� t t f f.s ,�.i t +l � � �" - � y 'i � .+ yi h "'o �, fc �� � .:
--.-V tw�4
y}; ,� --• i L 'a3 z .. X .e Yt -) # qr,„y '3 x �1 a.<S {' - 4 -ii rrt { i. b- f y `I+"s t r 1,�@ !' f a
,z � ,ri.P 3 + �.' � 4 •rIV�' sN>Fr , �t+�-R'"<y.r't �i yti`r�,F -erg-s --.,x'+,-�-Y.s' �� � "'�r1':� x +nt,+�' .+ ,,r-.. u°x �i � r"� f -+t e� � - � •r v -,+^ :q: fir. [� w5�+ FSi+,r "To- 2. "' i.•4=;
.,T �' d"'r . �.Y � 2.s�r, T. T' r 'r .W f..�,' ; �'ta �t+� y;. . 4 F y I F . � ,4 i a4 >.=i. +'+. _- ,4M i, , r� ^t� �.f 'r i� �5 ,k�� r j �� p•,�..
w
- . �Sy- 1 k 'YT's.G�t � }i -r�f}; '�,•:+ i �'. T .}� i T .A' � i-.�3-t t "� r ..
+v i � y Y � � `t � n• s -�, 4 i"' »S "'L � y a y .s L .+r 1 � - _{
�„a,+�• } S' ,.�' 3 "� � �+' l J� ,� s z,g` { ,�� ) � ;� .,,y JI'a�sxt � y5 s 4 r�z-:`�' .�- _ -r .; --
� v
�7tT '�' �s AS.. �+`: Sr_ r'`"' t �' L �-.it - "= �� �Pt _ .{, Y"^, 4 -,R F�xT •4;
MS+ 1
f �"�. ! 3..�.-_!. Y� J' .Y 4t .awn.' 4 ••k `1°'�__4:.L.
;'2
_ N_t
ti _ gj
t � �
7 � �
t
We, the undersigned, hereby a.-ree with the proposed improve-
ments to Lakeside Park including a blacktop play area,
more playground equipment, a blacktop trail thr,&u5h the
park, picnic tables, benches, and a backstop lmr playing
ball.
&te
�3a p
S ! �
� ^ ' G� r Cl * ujM �� ' Car 5S1a�_
4 -m -t) 1, .C-
d X464 ), AO) sf /,Z3
� 7G
? l9e7
�Ta . /� i ta-Q- &ztalx_ /DaAA� 60-a-4
r
-70
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Seventeen
PARKING LOT VARIANCE FOR FIRE STATIONS
B. Variance Consideration for Certain Parking Lot Improvements for
Fire Stations 1, 2 and 3 --At the May 5 City Council meeting, the
Director of Public Works presented parking lot/driveway improvements
as recommended by the Fire Chief for Fire Stations 1, 2 and 3. The
improvement for Fire Station 3 is considered a minor patch and does
not cause encroachment or setback concerns to any adjoining property
owners. The improvement for Fire Stations 1 and 2 do impact the
City setback requirements and therefore the City has notified the
adjoining property owners for Fire Stations 1 and 2 that the City is
contemplating improvements to the parking lot and driveway surfaces
for each of those two fire stations.
The Director of Public Works and City Administrator were discussing
the proposed improvements and felt that it was appropriate to advise
the City Council of another alternative to the parking lot
improvements. Currently, the City requires curb and gutter for
driveway and parking lot improvements for all commercial/industrial
buildings. If the parking lots at Stations 1, 2 and 3 are improved
without curb and gutter, the City could be accused of inconsistently
enforcing its parking lot driveway development regulations. As an
alternative, the City could authorize any temporary patching this
summer with the understanding that the parking lots for all three
(3) stations will be brought into compliance in 1988.
Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the Planning
Department report.
Also enclosed on page5;% is a copy of a letter that was sent to
the adjoining neighbors for Fire Stations 1 and 2.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize improvements to
Fire Stations 1, 2 and 3 or authorize temporary patching and direct
a permanent improvement for all three (3) parking lots and driveways
for consideration in 1988.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REVISED SITE PLANS
APPLICANT: EAGAN FIRE DEPARTMENT
LOCATIONS: STATION 1, 3940 RAHN RD
STATION 2, 2980 LONE OAK CR
STATION 3, 4390 PILOT KNOB RD
EXISTING ZONING: STATION 1, PUBLIC FACILITY WITHIN CEDAR
GROVE
STATION 2, PUBLIC FACILITY WITHIN THE
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL
PARK NO. 2
STATION 3, PUBLIC FACILITY WITHIN WIL-
DERNESS RUN
DATE OF PUBLIC MEETING: MAY 19, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 12, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SITE PLAN SUMMARIES: The Eagan Fire Department has submitted
plans to revise the site plans for Fire Stations 1, 2, and 3.
Enclosed is a summary of the proposed changes.
Rtat; r%n i
The blacktop area on the north side of the station would be
enlarged to accommodate more firefighters' automobiles. The back
(east) side and the front sides would be enlarged to allow for
easier truck movement. No new concrete curbing would be
installed.
The. enlargement of the blacktop area on the back side of the
station is to allow for easier access to the rear entrance doors
of the station by larger trucks. The remaining grass areas to be
removed are to allow for more area for cars and trucks. No new
concrete curbing would be installed.
The small enlargement at the corner of the driveway and parking
area is to "fill-in" the hole that has been created by the trucks
cutting across the grass. This will then make a nearly straight-
out exit from the station to Pilot Knob Road for the emergency
vehicles. No new concrete curbing would be installed.
STAT � o Aj � I
06 LAQF-
OL 74-
10
tA
31 1
-3-31-97
3 —3 x-87
ST pt7- \o � a
PtibPaKTyp%o Pcft"
\NE L_%luE
ye'
Tqb� J TR 6
pvT
i
6t• 3't{�G�t
A l P, wat_L
Spp�EN .H�I
F:::T
tp �
2 � .
STPC-. e,�TYS
a
Cor,onLs
S, ----
•
f`' . Q TRK A OO �T1orV
3
OUT LLLLZ
_Q RETAjN�N(,
W R 4'- \ T1ikE
Tt� SP�+`^� CoNCRETF_ 50i� ou.T
. P►-A�-E \ �SucE
3� H VGH
/7
p Rv\to cz, A ?-"E N
X
X
X
3-31-87
P � i_�T l�No t3 fZO,
JrcPc� �
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
CITY OF EAGAN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on May 19 1987,
at 7:00 o'clock p.m. a Public Meeting will be held by the
Eagan City Council at the Eagan'City Hall pursuant to the
application of Eagan City_Fire Department
in accordance with chapters 11 & 13 of the Eagan City Code to
consider the application for Revised site plans to the
stati
of property located in DAkota County, Minnesota, T-27, R -23W,
described as follows: Located in the NW4 of Section 20 on Rahn
Road at Valley View Drive.
Dated: May 12, 1987 EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAGAN
E. J. VanOverbeke
City Clerk
179
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
CITY OF EAGAN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on May 19 1987,
at 7:00 o'clock p.m. a Public Meeting will be held by the
Eagan City Council at the Eagan City Hall pursuant to the
application of Eagan City Fire Department
in accordance with chapters 11 & 13 of the Eagan City Code to
consider the application for Revised site plans to the
fire station.
of property located in DAkota County, Minnesota, T-27, R -23W,
described as follows: Located in the SWC of Section 2 on Lone Oak
Circle.
Dated: May 12, 1987 EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAGAN
E. J. VanOverbeke
City Clerk
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
CITY OF EAGAN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on May 19 1987,
at 7:00 o'clock p.m. a Public Meeting will be held by the
Eagan City Council at the Eagan City Hall pursuant to the
application of Eagan Cite Fire Department
in accordance with chapters 11 & 13 of the Eagan City Code to
consider the application for Revised site plans to the
fire station.
of property located in DAkota County, Minnesota, T-27, R -23W,
described as follows: Located in the NA of Section 27 on the
NE corner of Pilot Knob Road and Wilderness Run Road.
Dated: May 12, 1987 EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAGAN
E. J. VanOverbeke
City Clerk
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Eighteen
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT/OFF-SITE TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
C. Consideration of Ordinance Amendment Regarding the Regulation
of Off -Site Temporary Advertising Signs --At the April 21, 1987
meeting, consideration was given to the adoption of an amendment to
the City Code that would restrict the location of off-site
advertising/developme t signs. A copy of that proposed ordinance is
enclosed on page and under Section 4.20, Subdivison 2A, the
last sentence reads as follows: "No off-site advertising/development
signs shall be permitted." The restriction in this regard is a ban
of all off-site advertising signs. Also included in that ordinance
proposal is the omission of item 3 under C which currently reads
"area identification signs for major apartment complexes." That
language is eliminated from the proposed ordinance.
Representatives of the Developers Task Force were present at the
April 21 meeting, and raised a number of issues and concerns about
the inverse effect a total ban of off-site temporary advertising
signs could cause to the community with the amount of development
that is occurring during these active growth years. The City
Council redirected the off-site temporary advertising sign issue
back to the Developers Task Force, asking that a findings be
presented no later than the May 19 City Council meeting. Enclosed
on pages f5 through & is a memo from the City Administrator to
the Developers Task Force, outlining the directive taken by the City
Council.
A meeting was held on May 7 and the Developers Task Force spent
approximately two hours discussing the impact a total ban of off-
site temporary advertising signs would have on the consumer finding
real estate development areas throughout the community. The
Developers Task Force expressed a concern that individual builders
and some developers would pepper intersections throughout the
community with small directional signs that conform to the less than
ten day regulation within the City Code. In other words, a develop-
ment that has several builders constructing homes within the
subdivision could all put up small signs on intersections on various
weekends and comply with the temporary off-site directional sign ten
day limit. There was a concern expressed that a more restrictive
ordinance as opposed to a total ban would allow fewer directional
signs if regulated properly.
The Developers Task Force is recommending two options for
consideration by the City Council and is highly supportive of option
number 1 which is entitled "the Restrictive Ordinance." The
Restrictive Ordinance would allow off-site temporary advertising
signs during each calendar year from April through November. Option
number 2 is a phasing schedule that is encouraged if the City
Council wishes to proceed with a total ban ordinance. Because the
construction season is so far along this year, it would be difficult
for developers and builders to change their marketing strategy
during this calendar year and, therefore, it was encouraged that
Ov
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Nineteen
OLD BUSINESS CONT'D.
temporary off-site advertising signs be allowed until November 1,
1987, under this consideration.
Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the review and
recommendations as prepared by the Developer Task Force at their
May 7 meeting, and also enclosed on page is a map indicating
the location of existing signs and propose signs for off-site
temporary advertising signs if the restrictive ordinance is
approved.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
recommendation of the Developers Task Force regarding the
enforcement of off-site temporary advertising signs.
ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF' EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN
CITY CODE, CHAPTER 4, ENTITLED "CO1110— 'RUCt'ION LICENSING, PERMITS AND
REGULATIONS, INCLUDING SIGNS, EXCAVATIONS, AND MOBILE HOME PARKS" BY
AMENDING PROVISIONS REGARDING LOCATION OF ADVERTISING AND BUSINESS
SIGNS.
THE CIi'Y COUNCIL OF THE CI'T'Y OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Eagan City Code, Chapter 4, is hereby amended by
amending a Section to read:
SEC. 4.20. PLACEMENT, ERECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS.
Subd. 2. Permitted Uses.
A. Location of Advertising Signs. Advertising signs
are permitted on property zoned Business or Industrial.
No off site advertising/development signs shall be
permitted.
B. Location of Business Signs. Business signs are
permitted on property zoned Business, Industrial,
Agricultural, Public Facilities, R & D or PD only in
conjunction with an approved Business, Industrial or
Agricultural use.
C. Location of Business Signs in Residential Areas.
Business signs in Residentially zoned areas or areas of
PO designation for residential use only under the
following cases:
1. "For Sale" or "For Rent" signs, 4 feet x 4
feet or smaller, advertising the premises upon
which such sign is located.
2. One (1) Temporary on site sign containing no
more than 100 square feet with a ten (10) foot
maximum height shall be permitted.
Section 2. Eagan City Code, Chapter 4.99 entitled "Violation, A
Misdemeanor" is hereby adopted in its entirety by reference as
though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect
upon.its adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST:
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Clerk Its Mayor
Date Ordinance Adopted: April 21, 1987
Date Ordinance Published in the legal newspaper:
s
MEMO TO: DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 24, 1987
SUBJECT: STATUS OF DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE AND REQUEST FOR
A SPECIAL MEETING ON THURSDAY, MAY 7, 1987
At a special City Council Meeting that was held on March 31, 1987
the City Council reviewed the status of the Developers Task
Force. It was determined by the City Council that the Developers
Task Force would continue as a special Ad Hoc Committee and meet
on a formal basis when directed by the City Council. The City
Council also recognizes the value of the Developers Task Force
meeting periodically to discuss issues of common concern to both
the City and development community and will recognize this future
effort understanding that there will be no formal agendas or
minutes taken. If the Developers Task Force is specifically
asked to address an issue, there will be agendas and formal
minutes.
Administrative Assistant Hohenstein provided a summarization of
the issues that have been reviewed by the Developers Task Force
in addition to organizational opportunities for the Developers
Task Force in light of its sunset of March 1, 1987. A copy of
this memo and support documents is enclosed for your review.
This information was forwarded to the City Council as a part of
their staff review in preparation for the March 31, 1987,
meeting.
Regarding the recommendation of the Developers Task Force for
uniform multi-user directional signs to replace the temporary
advertising signs that have been allowed for a maximum of two (2)
years by developers, the City Council did take action at their
March 31 meeting. The action taken by the City Council was to
ban any and all off-site directional/temporary advertising signs
for developments within our community. An ordinance ammendment
was given consideration at the City Council Meeting on Tuesday,
April 21, 1987. Both Rod'Hardy.and Dan Gustafson were present
representing the Developers Task Force. Mr. Hardy did present a
number of arguments as to why some type of directional signs are
required for development projects within the community. Mr.
Hardy suggested that the Developers Task Force be given an oppor-
tunity to address the City Council's concerns and review any
alternatives that would allow some type of directional sign for
the benefit of guiding potential lot or home buyers to develop-
ments within the community. The City Council is hopeful that the
development community can effectively use either the media or
some other information source to replace directional/ temporary
advertising signs.
The City Council continued any further consideration on a revised
ordinance that would ban directional/temporary advertising signs
until the May 21 meeting to allow the Developers Task Force to
meet again and review their concerns and make any additional
recommendations for City Council consideration. A special
meeting of the Developers Task Force is scheduled for Thursday,
May 7, at 4:30 P.M. in conference rooms A and B.
Please contact this office if you are unable to attend the
meeting.
C� X, 94� -
City A ministrator
TLH/yn
OFF-SITE TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN
DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE
REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
On May 7, the Developers Task Force met to review the proposed
ordinance regarding temporary off-site advertising signs
throughout the community. After considerable discussion and
review, the Task Force agreed with the concerns expressed by the
City Council regarding the problems with the proliferation of
temporary off-site advertising signs presently allowed under the
current ordinance, but felt that specific controls could provide
comparable results of the proposed "Total Ban" Ordinance.
Therefore, before formal action regarding a Total Ban Ordinance
is acted upon by Council, the Developers Task Force would like to
have the following two options given serious consideration by the
Council:
I. RESTRICTIVE ORDINANCE
This ordinance would restrict the number, location and timing of
any off-site temporary advertising signs according to the
following general outlines:
A. Timing
1. Seasonal: April 1 to November 1 of any given
year.
B. Location
1. Temporary on-site advertising signs would be
"banned" at the intersection of two (2) Community
Collector (or greater) type classification streets
identified by the attached map.
2. Signs would be allowed only within one-half mile
radius of the identified site.
C. Number
Maximum of two (2) signs for:
1. Any subdivision of five or more residential lots.
2. Any commercial development of 10,000 sq. ft. or
greater.
D. Enforcement
1. Enforcement would be by City personnel through a
forfeiture of: a) $50 escrow per sign; and b)
the right of a renewal application for the
following year. V
II. PHASING SCHEDULE
If the proposed "Total Ban" ordinance is adopted, it is
recommended that it be phased in to accommodate the
following:
A. New Applications/Permits
1. Permits would be issued for new applications
providing for installations valid only until
November 1, 1987.
2. No new permits would be issued thereafter in
accordance with the proposed ordinance.
B. Existing Permits
1. Signs permitted under existing permits would be
allowed until their previously approved expiration
date.
The attached map identifies the location of the regulated street
classification system to help identify those intersections where
temporary off-site advertising signs would be prohibited in
accordance with Option #I above. Also shown on this map are
those intersections where current temporary off-site advertising
signs are presently located by existing permits.
The Developers Task Force strongly recommends the adoption of
Option #I (Restrictive Ordinance) as it is felt that this will
greatly minimize the problems as identified by the Council and
general public. However, it will still provide those
developments an ability to provide direction from a major
collector street onto a minor side street once the individual is
within one-half mile of that site. It is felt this last
directional sign is necessary due to the diminishing ability of
the traveling public to identify the minor local street while
traveling the higher classified collector street. Also, it is
felt that by permitting these signs to be installed only from
April 1 to November 1, it will ensure that new signs are
installed every year thereby eliminating the potential of little
or no maintenance concerns on deteriorating signs.
0
�-. 'TEMPORARY. SIGNS,
A �r B DE F G H I J K L
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS MEN
COMMUNITY -COLLECTORS { �' ;r %
NMM MINOR ARTERIALS I ' i , �� •• RI .
••••••••N INTERMEDIATEARTERIALS -•) p..
PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS e ' " q eis. `
• icun�� � � � �"' � _ «our::. 6 , �.s ' • n. ,
=+ f :�—r. ---a. ®�1 - �•.. F .rte a e'--•—�.. E i
ja
Vs
—'� yyy. 5.. liT"—cid .� . `I - �}• _ ,
55 22� �� t
IR
L ,.
r.,. c . T�
mac., J• � ,s�_• r � ' � � :g- ?' o ..r � r
W `Zi.
FA
- APPL~ VALL Y ® I Ros. WT�
A a (R'* D A f' >< 0 1t �H "4':
4. r-1 k l� K L
OFF SITE 80 • .
r
:ON SITE ''1:16 .
3.
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty
SPECIAL PERMIT%TWO-DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR DOMINIUM GROUP
D. Special Permit for Four 4' x 8' Two -Directional Signs to be
Located on Certain Intersections --The Dominium Group, developers of
Thomas Lake Apartment Complex located on Thomas Lake Road, appeared
before the City Council at the April 21 meeting, requesting four (4)
4' x 8' two -directional signs to be located at 1) the intersection
of Pilot Knob Road and Cliff Road, 2) the intersection of Thomas
Lake and Cliff Road, 3) Lot 2, Block 1, Knob Hill Professional Park
and 4) the intersection of Diffley Road and Thomas Lake Road.
The Dominium Group was told in early April that the City Council was
considering a total ban of off-site temporary advertising/direc-
tional signs and the ordinance amendment would be considered at the
April 21 meeting. As a result of action at the April 21 meeting to
send the directional/off-site temporary advertising sign ordinance
amendment back to the Developers Task Force, the special permit as
requested by Dominium Group was continued until the May 19 meeting.
The present ordinance only allows for two (2) off-site temporary
advertising signs. If action is take under item C of Old Business
for either of the options, the Dominium Group could only be allowed
two (2) off-site advertising/directional signs. If the City Council
decides to adopt the ordinance totally banning off-site temporary
advertising/directional signs, this special permit would be denied
due to its nonconformance with City Code regulations.
Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the Planning
Department report that was prepared for the April 21 meeting,
regarding the request made by the Dominium Management Service Group.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
special permit for Dominium Group, allowing off-site directional
signs pending action taken under item C of Old Business.
is
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT
APPLICANT: DOMINIUM MANAGEMENT SERVICE, INC.
(THERESE MURPHY)
LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 28, SW AND SE 1/4'S OF
SECTION 21
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY), AGRICULTURE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (82-4)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 21, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 15, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a
special permit to allow four (4) two-way directional signs all of
which will be 4' x 8' in dimension, allowing for a total of 32
square feet per side.
PLANNER COMMENTS: At a March 31, 1987 meeting of the City Council,
direction was given relative to the processing of "directional" sign
�= applications and for the preparation of a sign code amendment that
. tightly regulates future placement of said signs. This application
is forwarded to the City Council for consideration, however, because
to date the pending code amendment has not been officially adopted.
In absence of this code amendment, the Planning Department will
continue to process sign applications pursuant to the duly adopted
City of Eagan sign ordinance.
Dominium Management Services, Incorporated is presently constructing
Thomas Lake Point Apartments located on Thomas Lake Road,
approximately equadistant between Diffley and Cliff Roads. The
project was given final plat approval by the City Council on
November 19, 1985 and consists of 216 units with occupancy expected
to commence in July, 1988. A
The purpose for the directional signs is to direct potential
occupants to the project area which is relatively secluded. The
four directional signs will be located at the northeast quadrant of
Thomas Lake and Cliff Roads, the northwest quadrant of Cliff and
Pilot Knob Roads, the northwest quadrant of Pilot Knob and Diffley
Roads, and directly across Thomas Lake Road as it intersects with
Diffley. (Please refer to the enclosed exhibits for specific sign
locations.)
If approved, the four two -directional signs shall be subject to all
} applicable sign and City Code Ordinances.
V
SIGN LOCATIONS
THOMAS LAKE POINTE
* SIGN LOCATIONS
PROJECT LOCATION
y4-
I
til
j• tli jr
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -One
REZONING/PONDVIEW
E. Rezoning of Approximately 30 Acres from A to PD to Commercial
and Mixed Residential Planned Development --At the May 5, 1987 City
Council meeting, a recommendation submitted by the APC to recommend
approval of the rezoning from A to PD Commercial and Mixed
Residential proposed for the Pondview development was continued
until the May 19 meeting. The purpose for the continuance was to
allow the proposed users of property scheduled for development
within the Pondview Addition an opportunity to more accurately
define their parcels before a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and
rezoning is considered.
To date, the City has not received any further indication from the
Fairview Group or landowners regarding the specificity of which
location the Fairview medical facility will own and develop. It is
anticipated that the developers will be notifying the City prior to
preparation of the Administrative Agenda on Monday, May 18 and,
therefore, additional information will be provided at that time.
For review purposes a copy of the reports that were presented with
the May 5 City Council agenda packet, are again enclosed on pages
through ZZa for your review.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
rezoning assuming there is a proposed site/use designated by the
Fairview Group for the property.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THE REZONING - POND VIEW P.D.
APPLICANT: MOLINARO AND ASSOCIATES
LOCATION: PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF
SECTION 16
EXISTING ZONING: R-2 UNDER THE BLACKHAWK PARK P.D.
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 23, 1986, CONTINUED TO THE APRIL
28, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 22, 1987
Attached with this update is the original staff report dated
September 16, 1986, which give background information on the area
being requested to be included in the Planned Development.
The updated portion of this report deals with two issues, the first
issue is the traffic study which was requested by the Advisory
Planning Commission at either the January or February APC meeting.
This traffic study report was submitted to the City staff on April
20, 1987, staff is in the process of reviewing the document and will
be ready to make comments to the Advisory Planning Commission on
April 28. In regard to the traffic area, it appears that the
developments surrounding the Pilot Knob/Yankee Doodle intersection
have been taken into account to determine the ultimate impact on the
intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road. In this
analysis, it appears that approximately 95,000 trips + will be
generated from all of the surrounding developments. Of the 95,000
trips approximately 50% will be generated from Town Centre 70 and
only 5% of the trips will be generated from the Pond View
development proposal. Therefore, the impact appears to be minor
with the trips generated from Pond View on the entire transportation
system. Again, the traffic aspect will be discussed in detail once
an analysis of the traffic report has been made.
The use or uses proposed are: :still somewhat similar to the original
application submitted in September of 1986. Lot 1 - the applicants
are still proposing a one-story restaurant facility seating 242
people. Lot 2 - this is still the location of the three-story motel
with 110 rooms. Lot 3• - the applicant is still proposing a car care
facility. This particular use has created the most concern to the
City Council in regard to uses in the planned development. The
multiple site on the west side of the proposed north/south street is
the first area of change from the last review. Since the time the
traffic study has been ordered, the Fairview Development Company
has become interested in this area for an Urgent Care Facility. The
major issue is signage and easy accessibility to the general public.
Presently, the applicants have chosen a site that does have exposure
from I -35E and also is located on part of the original graded pad
for the Check Technology building. This facility is proposed to
construct a 12,000 square foot one-story facility with an expansion
capability of 10,400 square feet of additional space. This facility
could be the start of the campus setting that the Economic
� 9a
Development Commission and City Council has tried to capture with
the one-year development goal.
As stated earlier, this use has decreased the multiple use from the
original 208 to 108 multiple units proposed. At the present time,
there is no specific proposal for construction of the multiple
facility and the City could consider this as one of the elderly
housing sites in the future if the P.D. is approved with the Urgent
Care Facility directly to the north. The elderly study which has
been suggested by the Council has been completed but the task force
to identify locations has not been initiated at this time,
therefore, any specific proposal or recommendation for elderly
locations would have to be determined in the future.
The last use of the parcel in the southwest corner was the townhouse
site. At the present time, this site has been sold to Meritor
Development who has indicated that they would like to retain the
townhouse area but had no immediate plans for development. It was
suggested at one time that with the 108 units of the original 208
units of multiple to the north that the density for this townhouse
area be transferred north of the pond and open space be required
to the south. The area now has been sold to Meritor Development and
this transfer is no longer possible. It is suggested, however, that
the density not be established at this time and that the number of
units be proven on the site at a later point in time.
The Urgent Care Facility proposed by the Ridges has a time frame
that would involve starting construction as soon as possible with a
goal to open the facility by December of 1987. Therefore, if the
P.D. does not proceed through the development process, the '
applicants will have to seek an alternate location in order to meet
the time schedule set forth in their development plan.
The conditions of the September 16 report are still applicable.
c
c:=
92
CONDITIONS: POND VIEW P.D.
1. The applicant and owner enter into a planned development
agreement or amendment to the conditions of the planned
development in accordance with the concept plan submitted for
the six or seven lots proposed.
2. The overall plan be reviewed by the Dakota County Highway
Department and the Minnesota Department of Transportation
because this project abutts these rights-of-way.
3. A comprehensive plan amendment be processed in accordance with
the particular used allowed in this plan.
4. Prior to any first phase development, the existing residents of
the property be in agreement as to how and when the relocation
will take place.
5. Due to the expeditious review process by the Ridges facility,
it would be suggested that any of the uses not specifically
approved in the concept be omitted and carried as an outlot in
order to expedite the planned development review process.
This hopefully updates you as to the status of the Pond View P.D.
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
DALE RUNKEL, CITY PLANNER
FROM: ENGINEERING DIVISION
DATE: APRIL 23, 1987
SUBJECT: POND VIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - STAFF REPORT UPDATE
(TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS)
The Engineering Report of October 28, 1986, is still applicable to
this proposed development.
However, consideration of this proposed development was continued to
allow staff to do a specific Traffic Impact Analysis Study for this
development in relationship to the adjacent roadway network system.
In order to determine the impact of the proposed Pond View
development, consideration had to be given for other potential
developments within an overall study area that might affect the same
roadway network system. This overall study area is bounded by Lone
Oak Road on the north, Wescott Road on the south, Lexington Avenue
on the east and T.H. 13 on the west. The attached map shows the
study area and the current remaining or proposed future developable
sites within this study area.
Results of this detailed Traffic Impact Analysis Study indicate that
there will be severe capacity problems on individual roadway
'.' segments and specific intersections in the year 1991 and the year
2000.
r
However, the volume of traffic generated by this development
represents a very small percentage of the overall traffic volumes
and, in and of itself, does not create any of the identified traffic
congestions or capacity problems at any given location. The
development, however, contributes to the growth in area traffic and
as a result may be obligated to financial support of future roadway
improvements.
In order to properly evaluate the impact on various intersections,
this study also incorporated the traffic generation considerations
from the Town Centre development which includes the pending Town
Centre 70 8th Addition and Town Centre 100 4th Addition proposals.
Attached to this report is the "Summary of Conclusions" and
"Recommended Improvements" that were identified in the Impact Study
performed by the consulting engineering firm of Strgar-Roscoe-
Fausch, Inc. Subsequently, with the proposed upgrading of Pilot
Knob Road scheduled by Dakota County to begin in 1987, which takes
into consideration this proposed development, no additional
significant improvements are anticipated or required beyond those
identified in the previous staff report of October, 1986.
mv
M
POND VIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PAGE 2
Staff will be available to discuss in further detail the results and
implications of the Comprehensive Traffic Impact Study in
relationship to this proposed development at the April Planning
Commission meeting. No additional conditions of approval beyond
those prey! usly presented are proposed by staff.
Director of Pdblic Works
TAC/ jj
0
GOND VIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT — ENGINEERING REPORT -Page 4
10/28/86
CONDITIONS POND VIEW:
1. This development shall be responsible for extending the 12"
trunk storm sewer from I -35E along with all internal storm
sewer to the NWL of JP -3.
2. This development shall extend an 8" sanitary sewer under
Duckwood Drive to provide service to the area to the north.
3. Council shall authorize the installation of the 30" and 12"
trunk water main and the upgrading of Duckwood Drive and
Englert Road to City standards prior to final plat approval.
4. This development shall be responsible for an 8' trail along
Pilot Knob Road and a 5' concrete sidewalk along the south side
of Duckwood Drive.
5. Dedicate ponding and utility easement for JP -3 to HWL.
6. Dedicate. sufficient right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road in
accordance with County requirements.
7. Dedicate the necessary drainage and utility easements in
accordance with City ordinances or Staff's recommendations.
8. Responsible for trunk area assessments or upgrading of
assessments for water area, storm area, water lateral benefit,
Pilot Knob Road upgrading and trailway at the rates in effect
at the time of final platting.
9. Include a portion of 010-76, which is east of Pilot Knob Road,
with this plat.
10. The applicant and owner enter into a planned development
agreement or amendment to the conditions of the planned
development, in accordance with the concept plan submitted for
the 6 lots.
11. The overall plan be reviewed by the Dakota County Highway
Department and the Minnesota Department of Transportation
because this project abuts these right-of-ways.
12. A comprehensive plan amendment be processed in accordance with
this particular plan.
13. Prior to any first phase development, the existing residents of
the property be in agreeement as to how and when their
relocation will take place.
M
F;
cc H
0 0
O O
O U)
Y �
'3AV N8VY4N30
N
F-
W
O
Z x O
Cl)
= Q
t- a , Z a
CO p>-�aui cZl=-
s•' -o? QOx tea,
Z aWccMLIJ 1= Z J
W 3oz =C/)zom
N woiWWZOQQO
O-1 pJZZdW L)CCQW
j OZ00a-i0a-j
W a0E-f-xm0Na
amV[][u�C7x_
167,11
p6.
0
E
OR0
CC,
T
W
Ir
V
w
W
W w
” a0
}
o
cn
z
3 AV N OION I X 3l •,
, . �.„„,
z
0.
+
LC
a:1
I
t
'0i:€r`Ut3NX 101id
F;
cc H
0 0
O O
O U)
Y �
'3AV N8VY4N30
N
F-
W
O
Z x O
Cl)
= Q
t- a , Z a
CO p>-�aui cZl=-
s•' -o? QOx tea,
Z aWccMLIJ 1= Z J
W 3oz =C/)zom
N woiWWZOQQO
O-1 pJZZdW L)CCQW
j OZ00a-i0a-j
W a0E-f-xm0Na
amV[][u�C7x_
167,11
p6.
0
E
OR0
CC,
T
W
Ir
V
w
W
W w
” a0
}
o
cn
z
POND VIEW DEVELOPMENT
:. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
! • The anticipated development in the study area, expected to
occur by 1991, would add close to 95,000 trips per day to
existing traffic.
Z * Pond View development represents approximately 5 percent of
all new trips generated in the study area.
3 a Development anticipated beyond 1991 would add over 5,000 trips
per day if the sites analyzed are developed residential and
over 48,000 trips per day if developed as commercial/office.
CL- Providing six lanes of through traffic between Federal
Drive and Denmark Avenue.
- Providing a westbound to northbound on-ramp from Yankee
Doodle Road to I -35E.. This would eliminate the need for a
signal at this location.
Provision of a loop system of roads that would allow non -
local traffic to bypass the Pilot Knob/Yankee Doodle/I-35
ramps area of congestion.
f • Another option consists of controlling traffic growth by
U limiting the amount of development in the area, or by
selecting the type of development that will reduce
transportation system demand.
The level of development anticipated in the study area is of
such a magnitude that serious congestion problems will occur,
particularly on Yankee Doodle Road.
The key problem intersection is Pilot Knob Road at Yankee
Doodle Road. The daily approach volumes at this intersection
are projected to increase between 100 percent and 200 percent
over existing volumes by the year 1991.
:
�
In addition to Pilot Knob, four more intersections along
Yankee Doodle (up to Lexington Avenue) will be over capacity
by 1991, unless certain roadway improvements are made.
+r
Even with limited roadway improvements, however, the growth in
anticipated traffic is such that longer range solutions should
-,�
have to be examined. These include:
CL- Providing six lanes of through traffic between Federal
Drive and Denmark Avenue.
- Providing a westbound to northbound on-ramp from Yankee
Doodle Road to I -35E.. This would eliminate the need for a
signal at this location.
Provision of a loop system of roads that would allow non -
local traffic to bypass the Pilot Knob/Yankee Doodle/I-35
ramps area of congestion.
f • Another option consists of controlling traffic growth by
U limiting the amount of development in the area, or by
selecting the type of development that will reduce
transportation system demand.
SUBJECT: REZONING
APPLICANT: MOLINARO AND ASSOCIATES — POND VIEW P.U.D.
LOCATION: PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF
SECTION 16 BETWEEN I -35E & PILOT KNOB ROAD
EXISTING ZONING: R-2, UNDER THE BLACKHAWK PARK P.D. AND A
(AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 23, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 16, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The first application submitted is a request to
rezone approximately 29.7 acres from R-2,in the Blackhawk Park
Planned Development, and A (agricultural) to a planned development
which would allow a mixed commercial multiple residential use on the
29.7 acres. The specific uses would include Lot 1, a Bonanza
Restaurant consisting of 242 seats, Lot 2, a three story motel
consisting of 110 units, Lot 3, a 14,000 S.F. office, Lot 4, a
14,000 S.F. office, Lot 5, a ten story 208 unit apartment and Lot 6,
a 41 unit townhouse development.
ZONING AND LAND USE: In the review of this 29 acre parcel it
appears that a portion is within the Blackhawk Park north and a
small portion of the property could be outside of the planned
development depending upon where the actual road right-of-way is for
I -35E. In either case, the property would require amending the
zoning to allow a mixed commercial/residential planned development
as specifically stated above. The Comprehensive Guide Plan had been
amended in 1985 with the application of the CTC Check Technology
proposal. The zoning and planned development was approved and the
Comprehensive Guide did allow a change in the land use to an LB
(limited business) use for the northern 10 acres of this property.
Technically, a comprehensive plan amendment should be required in
order to allow a higher intensity commercial use, as is now being
proposed, versus the limited business which is presently on the
property.
BACKGROUND: In October of 1984, the City received an application
from Anderson Development, Inc., proposing to construct a corporate
headquarters for a company called Check Technology Corporation.
POND VIEW - REZONING
SEPTEMBER 23, 1986
PAGE 2
This development proposal consisted of a 72,000 S.F. office show
room structure which was to be the corporate headquarters for Check'
Technology Corporation. This request was looked at as major land
use change from the 1980 Comprehensive Guide which originally
designated this entire parcel as an R -II mixed residential with a
density of 3 - 6 units per acre. It was in the 1984 - 1985 process
that it was determined to try to coordinate the individual parcels
and come up with one master plan or planned development as to how to
develop this entire tract of property. It was the intention of
Anderson Development to develop this parcel as a commercial
facility. Needless to say, this development has not gone forward
and Anderson Development is no longer involved as owners or
applicants with this proposed project.
The submission made in September, 1986, would consist of six lots,
four commercial and two residential. The four commercial lots
could possibly be conceived as a higher intensity use than what was
originally proposed in 1984. The applicants have, however, done an
excellent job in coordinating the entire tract of property between
the residential owners - the Reeds, Mr. Cornwall on the north and
Mr. Dunn on the south. The property takes into account mixed use,
an overall circulation and•a fairly detailed concept plan as to how
this area would be proposed to be developed. The original
application also included a request for a preliminary plat in the
first phase which would be the Bonanza Restaurant on Lot 1 of this
development. Their detailed plans were received late by the City
staff and the preliminary plat could not be processed in time to
consider the first phase development along with the overall concept
of the planned development. The plans have been submitted to City
staff and will be processed and scheduled for the October Planning:
Commission meeting for a detailed review of the first phase. Since
the concept plan was fairly detailed, the staff suggested that an
overall concept be looked at and a review made on the total
development versus detailing one specific use.
Along with the land use change, the circulation pattern has changed
from the original concept. As you may recall, the original concept
with the one use building had a loop circulation road running along
the east property all the way down to Englert Road. The new
circulation plan is showing a stub access on Duckwood Drive to the
right-of-way of I -35E. This would allow an alternative to an
overpass if in fact traffic studies and circulation patterns for
Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road would require alternate
bypasses. Again, this is only a preventative measure and it is by
no means suggested that it be done or would even be feasibile. The
access to the project would be from Duckwood Road bisecting Lots 1
and 2, 3 and 5 and 3 and 4, thus creating a loop system with a right
in, right out at Crestridge Lane and full movement from the
intersection of Duckwood Drive. There is a question as to the need
to provide access to the south to Englert Road in connection with
this development plan.
,. POND VIEW - REZONING
SEPTEMBER 23, 1986
PAGE 3
In review of the overall land use issues, there is one comment staff
would like to make in respect to the overall density of the
development proposal. Presently the property is zoned R-2 (mixed
residential) with a density of 3 - 6 dwelling units per acre allowed
in the Blackhawk Park Planned Development. The application
submitted is a request for a high-rise facility consisting of 208
units, 10 stories at a density of 25.3 units per net acre. This is
a substantial increase in density from the original planned
development agreement. The applicant is also proposing an
additional 41 townhouse units on Lot 6, on the south end of this
project. Staff is suggesting that some density shifts be made to
potentially allow the multiple unit on the north side of the pond
and the townhouse project eliminated with just open space provided.
This would create the open space and transition area of this
triangular piece of property for higher intensity uses on the north
changing to residential south of Englert Road. In developing the
plan in this manner, it would eliminate any potential need to
provide access to Englert Road from the property north of the pond.
This is merely a suggestion to create a buffer zone and separate
these land uses. It is staff's understanding that the developer is
not in agreement with this proposal and is requesting some density
on the south side of the pond, just north of Englert Road. If in
fact density is allowed south of,the pond, some environmental issues
may be triggered even though an Environmental Impact Statement has
been prepared for the Blackhawk Park Planned Development.
This gives you the overall concept for this planned development
proposal. Again, the first phase has been submitted to City staff
for a Bonanza Restaurant located on Lot 1 and if the planned
.=' development is approved, will be processed at the October 28, 1986,
Advisory Planning Commission meeting.
CONDITIONS:
1, The applicant and owner enter into a planned development
agreement or amendment to the conditions of the planned
development, in accordance with the concept plan submitted for
the 6 lots.
2. The overall plan be reviewed by the Dakota County Highway
Department and the Minnesota Department of Transportation
because this project abuts these right-of-ways.
3. A comprehensive plan amendment be processed in accordance with
this particular plan.
4. Prior to any first phase development, the existing residents of
the property be in agreeement as to how and when their
relocation will take place.
OUARRY PAW
6-
C
9jr. rm
X59F
4CILM"Wr .r
OLEAR
LW .6
KS
SARA"
PUSLOC
WOR
all
-,A It
AMPlb
ADAF N
rY-
-Y 8
DA 1.1
MUw/
CFRr'E"',A
rrw
Ac
trw,
I T
ACt, JAN
ox
XE D
SURREY
GARDE.
m H
+08 R
S A
9F.
'GAN]
A
Lt3
L
R-11
RAI z.ro
FN -csc
141
p FLB) R-91
R-1
-BLA,
T
P—
OTY R-11
ifsHALL
R-11
E
R U
p
R-11
R-11
LB
1 �! fie t1 i� i lid illi �iil ilii ilii
!) IIII Illi �l III) II I IIIE s,i F : fill ts¢C j _
i
—� w�
q1;j I kV6 •,.00I�T[R.
POND VIEW P.U.D.
ff---aomr
PRELIMINARY PLAT
THORSEN CORNWELL
6200
WILLSON RD.
1 0
Q% 0
R0 L
ASSOCUTIS-- POND VIEW P.U.D.
TMOR5EN CORNWELL
92DO WILLSON
"D
EDINA LIN
1414
.11-11.1.
I
APC Minutes
April 28, 1987
POND VIEW P.D. - REZONING
The first public hearing of the evening convened by Chairman
Hall was in regard to the request of Molinaro and Associates for a
rezoning and planned development for approximately 30 acres
presently zoned Agricultural and Planned Development, to a
Commercial and Mixed Residential Planned Development located in part
of the east half of Section 16, abutting Duckwood Drive to the
north, and Pilot Knob Road to the east. Mr. Runkle introduced the
proposal, indicating that a Comprehensive .Guide amendment may be
necessary and had been properly noticed. He also indicated that the
application had been continued several times in recent months and
that the application before the Planning Commission consists of 6
lots made up of the 5 lots previously requested north of the pond
and deleting the lot south of the pond. The previous proposal had
been for a restaurant, hotel, office building, 10 -story apartment,
and 41 townhomes. The application had been amended requesting that
Lots 3 and 4 allow for the construction of a car care center and
general business use. Mr. Runkle advised that only recently, a new
use had been proposed for Lot 5, being an Urgicare Center for
Fairview Ridges Hospital.
It was noted that City Council had expressed an interest in
obtaining such a facility for the City and directed staff to try to
accommodate such a development. It was also noted that the previous
lot 6 south of the pond, had been purchased by a separate developer,
Meritor Development Company, and was not a part of this proposal.
Mr. Wayne Tauer, engineer representing the developer, indicated
that the traffic study had now been completed and that the proposal
would have less than a 5% overall traffic impact on the
intersections in the Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle area. He
indicated that the uses on Lots 1 and 2 had remained the same and
that the car care center could be deleted for' Lot 3, with the
request that Lots 3 and 4 be allowed as a General Business
designation due to the high cost of the purchase of these lots,
which included nice single-family.dwellings.
He indicated that Lot 5 was to contain the Urgicare Center which
is proposed to advance in two phases of construction, including a
12,000 square foot building in the first phase and an addition of
10,000 square feet in the second phase. He also indicated that what
had previously been designated at Lot 7 could be elderly housing in
conjunction with the medical campus. He requested that Lot 7 not be
designated as an outlot unless an indication was made as -to the
density to be allowed. No one from the public was present to
respond.
APC Minutes
April 28, 1987
Member McCrea questioned how the deletion of the Meritor
property would be handled, and was advised that it could be resolved
through the PUD amendment process. In response to the impact of
the changed uses on the traffic study, Mr. Colbert indicated that
the traffic study did include an assumption for mixed uses, and that
any change on traffic impact would be nominal.
Member McCrea then inquired as to the agreement with the Ridges
Hospital. Mr. Tom O'Connell of BTO Development was present and
indicated that he had been negotiating for a site for Fairview, and
that a critical stage of negotiation had been• reached and
conceptually agreed to approximately at 4:30 that day. He hoped a
Purchase Agreement could be drawn the next day.
Chairman Hall then asked whether a PUD amendment would be
necessary and could be a condition of rezoning. Mr. Keller
responded that the approval of the rezoning could be conditioned
upon the PUD amendment which in essence was a rezoning. Mr. Hall
indicated that the developer could be required to bring each lot
back to the staff in regard to its proposed use as the rezoning and
planned development were merely a concept plan at this time. Member
Trygg questioned whether the proposal was to contain 6 or 7 lots and
was advised by the developer that 6 lots were being proposed with a
7th potential lot in control of a separate developer, Meritor
Development Company.
Mr. Voracek questioned the impact of the Planning Commission's
decisions upon negotiations between Fairview and the developer. Ms.
Meg Cleary of the Fairview corporate staff, indicated that Fairview
was presently recruiting physicians for a facility in Eagan and
would find another site if this site was delayed.
Mr. Dunn was present and in response to questions, indicated
that Lot 7 could be designated as an outlot for elderly housing. In
response to Mr. Gustafson's questions in regard to the density
conditions proposed, Mr. Keller advised that as a part of the
amendment to planned development agreement, such a condition could
be agreed upon by the developer and the City. Mr. Hall expressed
concern in regard to the general business uses proposed for Lots 3
and 4, in particular the car care center. Mr. Dunn indicated that
the staff report suggested that the City Council was concerned about
the proposed use and that it could be a restaurant. Mr. Runkle
indicated that the Council had been pursuing efforts to find a
location for an Urgicare Center and had considered the Pond View
site as a potential location. In reviewing the proposed site, the
Council then noted the car. care center proposal.
Chairman Hall moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the rezoning and PUD amendment subject to the first four
conditions in the staff report and that Lot 7 be redesignated as Lot
6 with the condition that it contain no more than 108 units of
APC Minutes
April 28, 1987
residential use if meeting all ordinance requirements. As an
additional condition, Lots 3 and 4, if used as General Business,
would be restricted to not having high traffic retail such as
convenience stores, gas stations, etc. Gustafson, Voracek and Hall
voted in favor; Trygg, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. The motion
failed to pass.
Trygg moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of
the rezoning and PUD amendment and comprehensive guide amendment,
subject to the condition that Lot 7, 3, and 4 be designated as
Outlots. McCrea and Trygg voted aye; Voracek, Wilkins, Gustafson
and Hall voted nay.
Wilkins moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the rezoning, planned development amendment, and comprehensive
guide amendment, subject to the condition that Lot 7 be designated
as an outlot without stipulation as to density of residential use
and that Lots 3 and 4 be designated as General Business. In
addition to the 5 conditions proposed in the staff report. Wilkins
voted aye; McCrea, Hall, Voracek, Gustafson and Trygg voted nay.
The motion died.
:{ Voracek then moved and Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend
-
approval of the rezoning and planned development and comprehensive
guide amendment, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant and owner shall enter into a planned
development agreement or amendment to the conditions of the planned
development in accordance with the concept plan submitted for the
six or seven lots proposed.
2. The overall plan shall be reviewed by the Dakota County
Highway Department and the Minnesota Department of Transportation
because this project abuts these rights-of-way.
3. A comprehensive plan amendment shall be processed in
accordance with the particular use allowed in this plan.
4. Prior to any first phase development, the existing residents
of the property shall be in agreement as to how and when the
relocation will take place.
5. Lots 3 and 4 shall not be used as convenience retail or
motor fuel sales generating a high volume of traffic.
6. The lot designated as Lot 7 shall be platted as an outlot.
The motion passed with Hall and Gustafson voting no, and McCrea,
Voracek, Wilkins and Trygg voting yes.
,,rte
'ra
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Two
REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/PRELIMINARY PLAT
AND VARIANCE FOR R & B ADDITION
F. Rezoning of 2.08 Acres from R-4 to CSC, a Comprehensive Guide
Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot and a Parking
Stall Variance for Leroy Rother and Gerald Braun --A public hearing
was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular
meeting held on April 28, 1987, to consider applications submitted
by Leroy Rother and Gerald Braun to rezone 2.08 acres from R-4 to
CSC, a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment from D -III to a commercial
status, a preliminary plat entitled R & B Addition and a variance to
the number of parking stalls were all considered. The APC is
recommending approval of the applications. At the request of the
developers, the City Council continued these applications from the
May 5, 1987 City Council meeting, until the May 19 meeting, allowing
Mr. Rother and Mr. Braun to reanalyze their parking lot layout.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and
Engineering Department reports, copies are enclosed on pages CS
through.
The City staff is coordinating meetings between Federal Land Company
and the applicants for R & B Addition in an effort to coordinate the
alignment of driveway accesses onto Duckwood Drive. The City is
currently awaiting a response and proposal by Federal Land and is
hopeful their review will be completed by Tuesday to allow these
applications to be further considered by the City Council. It is
anticipated that a resolution will be made prior to Tuesday's
meeting and a staff update will be provided with the Administrative
Agenda on Monday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) rezon-
ing from R-4 to CSC, 2) a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, 3) a
preliminary plat for R & B Addition and 4) a variance to the number
of parking stalls, if appropriate.
Special N ote: On Tuesday, May 12, the City staff met with the
developers of the R&B Addition,: Ken Applebaum and Federal Land
Company to review the proposed developments and potential future
developments in regard to common driveway access onto Duckwood
Drive. At that meeting, staff was informed by Federal Land Company
that they have not yet completed their revised lay out for the
second phase of the shopping center and were not ready to discuss
any proposed driveway locations. They indicated strong objections
to the City approving this plat with any driveway location that
would result in a restrictive constraint on the ultimate development
of their parking lot circulation pattern and accesses.
Subsequently, based on their schedule, consideration of the
preliminary plat for the R&B Addition is recommended to be continued
until the June 2 meeting to allow the property owners and City staff
to pursue further acceptable locations for the limited driveway
accesses that will be allowed onto Duckwood Drive. The City has
also requested a traffic consultant to provide recommendations on
proper spacing based on traffic generations and projected volumes,,on
Duckwood Drive. A/—
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN
AMENDMENT, VARIANCE, PRELIMINARY PLAT (R &
B ADDITION)
APPLICANT: LEROY ROTHER AND GERALD BRAUN
LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECTION 15
EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (MULTIPLE)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 28, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 16, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted
requesting a rezoning of 2.08 R-4 (multiple) acres to a CSC
(community shopping center) district and a preliminary plat for the
R & B Addition. This plat consists of one lot and a 12,000 S.F.
building with two tenants. The November, 1986 Land Use Map
designates this area D -III, mixed residential, (3-6 units/acre),
therefore,an amendment will be necessary.
SITE PLAN: Currently, the site is vacant and flat along Duckwood
Avenue. The rear portion rises quickly to a wooded knoll nearly 20'
above street grade. Across Duckwood Drive to the north and east is
the Town Centre 70 8th Addition (CSC). Unplatted (CSC) land is to
the west and undeveloped property along with the Hidden Oaks
Townhomes are to the south - separated from this plat by the mature
trees on both sides of the property line.
The building coverage is 13% gross area, 17% net area and 30% is
permitted. All building and parking setbacks conform to Code
requirements.
The 12,000 S.F. building occupied by Simik's Meats (3,360 S.F.) and
Hardware Hank (8,640 S.F.) would share parking and a single loading
dock on the back of the building. Code requires 80 10' wide parking
stalls for a building this size - 59 have been provided (1:150 up to
the first 20,000 S.F.). Since on site proof of 21 stalls cannot be
demonstrated with this layout, a variance will be needed to allow
the proposed number. The loading area will be screened from the
south by the grade change alone. A three tiered wall will be
constructed along the southern property line of the area between
levels is large enough for planting, maintenance free material
should be used. A final landscape plan on a grading plan will be
required with the final plat submission. It must be compatible with
the sizes, amount and species of the adjacent commercial
properties.
Possible trash locations should be determined prior to the final
building design as should any mounted signage since no pylon has
been requested at this time.
GRADING/DRAINAGE: This two -acre development located on the south e
side of Duckwood Drive just east of Denmark Avenue is proposed to
be tucked into the heavily wooded side hill on the south side
adjacent to the condominimum townhouse complexes. From the top of
the hill on the south to the bottom of the pond on the east, there
is a 28' elevation differential. The grading plan proposes to
construct a 15' high terraced retaining wall along the south side
removing a substantial portion of this side hill and its related
vegetation. The grading plan also proposes to complete the
development of the south half of Pond JP -67 adjacent to Duckwood
Drive in the eastern corner to accommodate the City's storm sewer
requirements. This development would involve the installation of a
semi -recessed loading dock on the south end of the building. The
resulting 10% cross slope grade of this southerly service road is
not feasible or acceptable. To obtain an acceptable 2% cross slope
would add another 1-2' to the height of the retaining wall.
Due to the inadequate preliminary design of the overall drainage
plan submitted with this application, extensive engineering reviews
had to be performed to ensure continuity for the existing drainage
patterns in addition to handling the runoff generated from this
development. Subsequently, instead of performing a conceptual
review, staff had to actually design this system on behalf of the
developer. These results indicate additional storm sewer facilities
being required to handle both the internal and external drainage as
it affects the development of this property and its proper discharge
into the City pond on the east end. The drainage system as proposed
with this application is inadequate and unacceptable without
incorporating the preliminary design of he City's review.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water service of sufficient size and
elevation is immediately available within Duckwood Drive to provide
service to this proposed development. The existing 6" water lateral
stub from Duckwood Drive will have to be extended to the west
property line to be continued with further development to the west
providing for proper looping. The size of the individual water
services to the building will be reviewed as a part of the building
permit application process.
STREETS/CIRCULATION: This application proposes to construct only
half of the required common driving aisle along the west property
line. This is inadequate for proper traffic circulation. Either
the entire driving aisle should be contained within this development
or adequate easements should be obtained to allow the construction
of the full driving aisle width along the west property line.
The two driveway access points to Duckwood Drive are not acceptable
or compatible with proposed driveways on the north side of Duckwood
Drive or the common internal cross easement driving aisle through
the property to the west. The access drive at the northern most
point of the property should be eliminated and relocated,
approximately 160' to the south opposite the proposed major entrance
into the Town Centre 70 8th Addition development and constructed at
a minimum 30' width dimension to provide for the required cross
traffic movement from the west. Also, the southerly most driveway
should be eliminated and consolidated into this singular major
driveway access. This will require a redesign of the internal
traffic circulation and parkin t configuration which should then
/ l e�,
be further reviewed by staff to ensure proper internal circulation
for customers, employees and delivery vehicles. All other minor
access drives should be constructed to a minimum 24' width.
Also, the comprehensive trail system requires a trailway along the
south side of Duckwood Drive across this development.
ASSESSMENTS: This development was previously assessed for trunk
area sanitary sewer, trunk water, lateral benefit from.trunk water
main and street improvements for the existing Duckwood Drive.
However, all previous assessments were levied at the single-family
or multiple residential rate and not at the proposed commercial.
rate. This property has not yet been assessed for trunk area storm
sewer. In addition to this unlevied assessment, this development
will be responsible for the upgrading of previous assessments to its
proposed commercial use. These are defined as follows:
Item
Trunk Area Water (Upgrade)
Duckwood Dr. Street (Upgrade)
Lat. Benefit from Trunk
Water Main (Upgrade)
Trunk Area Storm Sewer
Qty.
Rate
Amount
Proj. #
1.58 ac
$1,920/ac*
$3,029
58
363.16 ft
15.84/ff*
5,752
429
363.16 ft
8.08/lf*
2,934
429
68,721 sf
0.079/sf
5,429
429
Total
$17,144
Rate reflects difference between commercial and residential rates.
Final assessment obligations will be based on final quantities
defined in the final plat and will be based on the rates in effect
at the time of final plat application.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: A 44' half right-of-way must be
dedicated for the existing Duckwood Drive. Adequate easements for
the ponding area has previously been conveyed to the City in the
eastern corner of this development.
There are no outside .agency permits anticipated as a requirement of
this development approval.
R & B CONDITIONS:
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. A variance to allow 59 parking stalls shall be approved.
3. A landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat
submission compatible in sizes and species with the adjacent
commercial properties. The financial guarantee shall not be
released until after one year from the date of installation.
The SE portion of the parking lot shall be suitably screened
from the residential land to the south.
4. This plat shall adhere to all applicable Sign Ordinances.
5. No rooftop fan units shall be visable.
6. The trash enclosure (s) must be located next to or within the
building and approved by the Fire Marshall. No perimeter trash
enclosure will be allowed.
7. No exterior storage shall be permitted.
8. All four sides of the building shall be constructed of the same
materials.
9. Shall be subject to a parks dedication fee.
10. The two proposed driveway connections shall be consolidated
into one major access approximately 160' southeast of the
northern most corner. A 30' cross easement and driving aisle
shall be dedicated from this major driveway access to the
westerly property line.
11. The ponding area in the southeast corner shall be constructed
to provide the required storage volume in accordance with the
Comprehensive Storm Sewer system.
12. This development shall provide an internal storm sewer system
to handle the onsite runoff and the drainage from the west and
discharge it into the ponding area in the east corner. If any
portion of this project is to be performed under City contract,
the project must be authorized by Council action prior to final
plat approval.
13. The internal traffic circulation and parking lot layout shall
incorporate the minimum 24' driving aisle width with concrete
curb and gutter perimeters, especially in those areas where it
encroaches on adjacent private property.
14. A revised grading plan shall be submitted providing proper
cross slopes and parking lot grades within the service road on
the west and south side of the facility.
15. This development shall accept its financial obligations
pertaining to additional and upgraded special assessments.
16. This development shall extend the 6" water lateral to the west
property line for continuation of service.
17. This development shall be responsible for the installation of
an 8' bituminous trail along Duckwood Drive.
Of`
i
m m R'
;I
y 0 0!
p>�
mo0 !I
°c m
Iz m A
:1 s"
1 I 1 I —
B -CARs
I
I
I ��
I
o MFq T
x �3 Mq
a so s.R�fFT
1
I
'
yR
9,CARS ; -
..'fir
I � I
c•D
1'
-
; s;CARs`
i I I
f
a I
I• I
I
9,CARS ; -
..'fir
i
c•D
��-..-,
-
f
Z
K m -D
co Om
m co
O�Om m
mo rv-im�
NN --IN
m(n ZZ>>
Z N z z m m
Om L) 17DD
u,10M0)
O N cn I m 0
O n A ti 03
O N m
O i CA
C/) N 5D
T 'T1 71
/,=;z C) 1
// co
o�
,X 0
..'fir
c•D
��-..-,
-
s
gh
0 41 0w
-'•a. fll
•� G1
9 z .\ s
'.a it .t i 1 I i' Illilrll ',F�
' � � - // 1 �, ,11'1 l 1 I l\ �, �'� ::� •� �' i • � -'`' ' /
' / 1
IT
art ,I s,kFrl — —• ��-i!-- •
i I
f t f
`•, ' ' � ;, it
z
v Rl
ZZ
pyo Z a
C)
!7 f r t
j� v M
r0
O z z I'
z
:eep.
F
E � 'ill is -it
m m ii �F.� ►ie� rr e�tl
E icl F.
r -G jt- Fir, It,! -z
wo
2
z� I.
b / ;; '
I I
/
O
D
r—,-< o
/
v i
CCU
O i
naa
mD
._
:c m
M/ 74.0 /6,V
12 I Imo? 11
7 '0
7 4
0
'0" r6
loll QP
15
FOX
46 �3/6, 404
RIDGE
I.ij�9 i.0 57.9/73-0 46.3/62.0 40.4/
t7
41.9/60.0 61.5/80.0
2011 7rar'!'.1kil 1(�D -1.
21M
D00110LAD
3RD
A6ENT SUF E.? EN JINI�L At
TL�NT > - ------
( iku? �— . 1 4-);? K�
SITE dTH. ADD/J 4, TO
HEIGH,rs
2 kG. D, x
P jBLIC
fo 7. 5 . 2/ 703T% 2ND
n.fc- f D CGI ADDITION
6 6
811
55,/,7'aT" '.3V7XICOT KNOB 84
2 03- '2411
8.1 A3 Or
311 KWOOD
4 RAILS
8 4-1. C, I DO
3 P
30" 8 4 .9
43.3/1
100 ry)
84.7 98.0
IYK... . .... .. . .. . ..........
78J/96.0
CITY
HALL
L
1K 4
K
/� % � goo
,.0 7
�,, t
17, : ,
c
A I y of eagan
PUBLIC
2 f WORKS
-
IZOAM
I
in TME
1-69.0
S �4L--
%
%811
50.3/E
0
IT -
12' .1 181
-�FSIOTJ
53.2/68. -5 0-4
:X81.0
1611
am dmsm
CD 54.6/.
AD
-1--NO. 21611
CD 5 3.1
59.9/7x5.
59.8/76.
ef,78) 51.4
SUBJECT PARCEL
P A M A M
Lill I lully FIG. --1k _q
approved standard
plate #: ----
WATER
MASTER PLAN
Om Ic--?3
'U R rif Y
Sed IIAROENS
24""C
L HTS
C Ls
_P I
825.0/ zee
OP
Cz,
JP -2
844.0
85/.5
r —
44
47
855.4 1 4
-4 0"�' .
DP V_at�o� I .
D -2 7 2
874 , 8 1 1874.8 L.S.-7 1 7
C,008L8 to a
79'qOAD l..
e
yi, _EL_ Pt _j I
::-�w -fwz;QP -1
P0
L 8Z.0 D
7/ T jF,('�' DP -20 D -r -- ff, 60. 0 81
901.0 T0.11A - 8;
11>1 0
904.2 011
OP -i 23 DP -1 14�1
88?.� AQD1
2- 89'0
89�* 6 EA Y PARK 8 D -w CAR
1, H
12"
dr G
Qr�Ul
8
890.0 - kt7,
882 1
9z "ix
L �Xl N
8800,1 rlllk�i
ci-
\
.92.�
FIS'
jp
JP -5
823,8
8341 0
CITY
- - I
-BP-2'8
8 6 2.6 T_
668.0 5�OVD
1. _L
B -
48 b
P 3"
732,
! =1N
- L-970.6
'j
71
�.��4-9015
JP -6—
893.0
'W8973-,
895.5
'>jP-46
N
_T T
------- . ......
JP -63=' _.."
J
'jP-11
815.7
899.7:,
-90 XT
0. 73 di)
'13" 44'
830.0
8907
lt3ld3 4 LAt
.7
S?Ot-r., ROAD/i 4
-b'
-L
T'T't
TON,
jp-
820.8 ADD.
830.0
J_f
SQUARE
=4
T
P - 9
818.1 .._...----
830.0
0 . . ......
830.036" �-� NC
14, �g%74PATCH � 27
4.
12
863"i _dd
J -
UBJECT PARCEL
R & B ADDITION
FIG. +V_'.
city of eagan approved: standard
EDPUBLIC STORM SEWER plate #:
WORKS
DEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN-
STORM SEWER TRUNK APEA-,,68i721 sq ft
. .............
TRAILWAY 363.16'
DUCKWOOD DRIVE UPGRADE -.:363.16'
rl
r
0
Z
m m
moca
ITjC
0 to m x
mo ni Z-4 Z 0
0 U)
V Z N N T4
0 0 > >
N z z m m
M C) G)> >
3 CD CD
NI CD 0
(Do Cl)
0 0 to
:n Ln
ii
Non
STORM SEWER TRUNK APEA-,,68i721 sq ft
. .............
TRAILWAY 363.16'
DUCKWOOD DRIVE UPGRADE -.:363.16'
rl
..........
...........
....... WATER AREA 1.58 Ac
.............
...
363.16'
ra Em M WATER LATERAL UPGRADE
APC Minutes
April 28, 1987
R & B ADDITION - REZONING, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT
VARIANCE & PRELIMINARY PLAT
The applications of LeRoy Rother and Gerald Braun for rezoning
of 2.08 acres from R-4 (Multiple Residential) to CSC (Community
Shopping Center) and a preliminary plat for R & B Addition, was the
subject of the next public hearing convened by Chairman Hall. This
plat is to consist of one lot and a 12,000 square foot building with
two tenants. Mr. Runkle presented the application, which involved a
small triangle of land left out of the previous rezoning of the
property to the north and west, in conjunction with the relocation
of Duckwood Drive. Both the property to the west and the north were
anticipated to be developed as CSC with townhomes to the south. The
proposal had 13% lot coverage, less than the required parking but
more than these existing businesses had had in the past.
Mr. Wally Trost was present to represent Mr. Rother and Mr.
Braun and discussion centered around the proper access to Duckwood
Drive.
Mr. Steve Knutson of Hidden Oaks Homeowners Association raised
questions as to the barrier presented by the hill and woods between
the two properties. It appeared that the hill between the building
and the existing townhomes was 28 feet in height from the proposed
building pad level.
Mr. Colbert advised the Commission that there was a problem with
the location of access, due to the need to locate the access for the
major shopping center development to the north, in order to impede
traffic as little as possible. Staff preference was for the two
entrances to be aligned at an intersection since the major shopping
center has already been submitted, it would eliminate a right -turn
movement, and avoid an extra access. It was indicated that this
proposal was merely a portion of a larger section that failed to be
rezoned when the realignment of Duckwood Drive was being considered.
McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend rezoning
and Comprehensive Guide •amendment in order to "clean up" the
remainder parcel left because of the realignment of Duckwood Drive
and the ponding which has now been defined. All voted in favor.
McCrea moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend preliminary
plat approval and a variance to the parking stall requirement,
subject to the following conditions:
1. All. standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. A variance to allow 59 parking stalls shall be approved.
APC Minutes
April 28, 1987
3. A landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat
submission compatible in sizes and species with the adjacent
commercial properties. The financial guarantee shall not be
released until after one year from the date of installation. The
southeast portion of the parking lot shall be suitably screened from
the residential land to the south.
4. This plat shall adhere to all applicable Sign Ordinances.
5. No rooftop fan units shall be visable.
6. The trash enclosure(s) must be located next to or within the
building and approved by the Fire Marshall. No perimeter trash
enclosure will be allowed.
7. No exterior storage shall be permitted.
8. All four sides of the building shall be constructed of the
same materials.
9. The plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee.
10. The two proposed driveway connections shall be consolidated
into one major access approximately 160 feet southeast of the
1 northern most corner. A 30 foot cross easement and driving aisle
shall be dedicated from this major driveway access to the westerly
property line.
11. The ponding area in the southeast corner shall be
constructed to provide the required storage volume in accordance
with the Comprehensive storm sewer system.
12. This development shall provide an internal storm sewer
system to handle the onsite runoff and the drainage from the west
and discharge it into the ponding area in the east corner. If any
portion of this project is to be performed under City contract, the
project must be authorized by Council action prior to final plat
approval.
13. The internal traffic circulation and parking lot layout
shall incorporate the minimum 24 foot driving aisle width with
concrete curb and gutter perimeters, especially in those areas where
it encroaches on adjacent private property.
14. A revised grading plan shall be submitted providing proper
cross slopes and parking lot grades within the service road on the
west and south side of the facility.
15. This development shall accept its financial obligations
pertaining to additional and upgraded special assessments.
=S�Ti'
APC Minutes
April 28, 1987
16. This development shall extend the 6 inch water lateral to
the west property line for continuation of service.
17. This development shall be responsible for the installation
of an 8 foot bituminous trail along Duckwood Drive.
18. The developer, Mr. Applebaum and the Colon brothers, shall
meet with City staff to determine the best access location prior to
the City Council meeting, which for this proposal shall be May 19,
1987, in order to provide for time.
19. Staff shall meet with the neighbors to the south to discuss
the plantings and screening between the two developments.
All voted affirmatively.
BLUE RIDGE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
The last public hearing convened by
to the application of L. A. Laukka D,
plat of B ue Ridge Addition which will bi
F of Lonek Addition, into a 9.8 acre
and two out is containing 37.25 acres ,
west, with Lont-11Oak Road to the south.
application indi ating that proof of p,
to the slight s ortage being proposed.
requested in an aa designated Light
allowed. It was in icated that the
Silver Bell Center �cloposal and that ,a
suggested that the accb,.,;� ses off Lone
Chairman Halla in regard
velopment for a reliminary
a replat of tlots E and
lot for an,. ffice/showroom
butting Highway #149 to the
Mr. Ruprkle presented the
rking,.,taould be provided due
21 lot coverage was being
dustrial where 35% is
oposal was similar to the
traffic study done in-house
Oak Road were too close
together.
Mr. Dale Beck of BRW as present and discussed green space,
utilities, parking, and land caping. He indicated Mr. Rick Berger
of Laukka-Beck was also pres t Mr. Beck suggested that due to the
curvature in the road, the raff report was in error in regard to
the distance between th two a cesses. He indicated he would
request approval subjec_ to sta f review regarding the traffic
safety issues. An owne,( across the \road from the property was
present and indicatedAis approval.
McCrea moved, Vilkins seconded the mot.. on to recommend approval
of the preliminar,�( plat, subject to the foll wing conditions:
1. All standard plat conditions shall be ahered to.
2. No flan units shall be visable.
3. A Zandscape planting plan shall be required with the final
plat submission. The financial guarantee shall not be released
until after one year from the date of installation.
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Three
PRELIMINARY PLAT/BLUE RIDGE ADDITION
G. Preliminary Plat of Outlots E and F of the Lone.Oak Addition
into a 9.8 Acre Lot for an Office Showroom and Two Outlots Contain-
ing 37.25 Acres --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning
Commission at their last regular meeting held on April 28, 1987, to
consider a preliminary plat entitled Blue Ridge Addition, presented
by L.A. Laukka Development that would replat Outlots E and F of the
Lone Oak Addition into a 9.8 acre lot for an office/showroom and two
(2) outlots containing 37.25 acres. The APC is recommending
approval. The City Council at its May 5, 1987 meeting, recommended
continuance of this item until the May 19 meeting, allowing for
additional review and consideration of traffic analysis reports that
were performed independently by BRW for the developer and Stgar
Roscoe on behalf of the City of Eagan.
Enclosed on pages P through LTL is a copy of the Planning and
Engineering Department reports on this item. Also enclosed on pages
L�,IS through lq2 is a copy of a letter that was received from legal
counsel representing Northwest Orient Airlines regarding the traffic
study.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat entitled Blue Ridge Addition as presented.
Special Note: On Tuesday, May 12, City staff met with
representatives of the proposed Blue Ridge development to discuss
the proposed driveway access onto Lone Oak Parkway and the resultant
in the existing center median. While the original traffic review
indicated that the access should be located further the west,
resulting modifications to the original design concept will comply
with City standards and are acceptable by the developer. It is
anticipated these revised configurations will be available during
their presentation on May 19.
/00
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (BLUE RIDGE ADDITION)
APPLICANT: L.A. LAURRA DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: SW 1/4, SECTION 1
EXISTING ZONING: P.D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 28, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 20, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a
preliminary plat for the Blue Ridge Addition. This plat will replat
Outlots E and F of the Lone Oak Addition into a 9.8 acre lot for an
office/showroom and two outlots containing 37.25 acres abutting
Highway 149 to the west with Lone Oak Road to the south. The
Planned Development Agreement designates this area: office, office -
showroom or research and development. No amendment should be
necessary.
The breakdown. of the building will be 60% office, 20% light
manufacturing or assembly and 20% wholesale/warehousing. The entire
building is 90,000 S.F.
BUILDING/SITE PLAN: The building is very similar to the Silver Bell
Plaza along Highway 13. This one story building will have a truck
loading area on the interior portion with access to Lone Oak Parkway
is provided near the NE corner of the plat. All building and
parking setbacks meet Code requirements. The applicant is proposing
9' width stalls. Given the proposed building uses, 393 stalls will
be required. 324 have been provided. A separate drawing for proof
of parking shows 452 spaces.
The floor area ratio (lot coverage) is 21%. Phase 3-4 of the P.D.
exhibit (proposed Lot 1 and the area directly south) were designated
for 100,000 S.F. office and 43,000 S.F. retail on 73.9 acres.
The proposed building will be constructed of dry vit, a material
similar to stucco, along the top of the building, interrupted brick
facing and dark green reflective glass and a 2' berm to the grade
level. No fan units are being shown on the elevations/sections.
Therefore, it appears that the parapet wall will be tall enough to
screen them.
The preliminary landscape plan works well conceptually on all sides.
A utility easement runs along Highway 149 and modifications in plant
material selections may be necessary in order to not interfere with
those utilities. Parking lot screening will still be required.
C
GRADING/DRAINAGE: The proposed site was graded as part of the Lone
Oak Addition. The site gently slopes from Lone Oak Parkway towards
State Trunk Highway 149. A preliminary erosion and sediment control
plan was not submitted with the preliminary plat application.
The site is proposed to be drained through two separate storm sewer
systems. The northerly part of the site (approximately. 2.2 acres)
is intended to drain by storm sewer into the existing storm sewer in
Lone Oak Parkway. This existing storm sewer has sufficient capacity
for this drainage area. The southerly portion of the site
(approximately 7.6 acres) will drain by storm sewer into a future
storm sewer by others designated as trunk on the plans. It is
assumed for purpose of this report that the trunk storm sewer by
others will convey the drainage to Pond FP -7. However, the plans
don't provide information regarding the trunk storm sewer by others
relative to its size and alignment.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size and depth to serve
this site are readily available along Trunk Highway 149 and Lone Oak
Parkway. One 8" service is proposed from the existing sanitary
sewer in Trunk Highway 149 and the other is proposed from the
existing sanitary sewer in Lone Oak Parkway.
The site will be served by the existing 12" water main in Trunk
Highway 149 and Lone Oak Parkway. Also shown is a proposed 8" water
main loop along the south side of the site connecting the existing
12" water main in Trunk Highway 149 to the existing 12" water main
in Lone Oak Parkway. Hydrants are shown and it is recommended that
two additional hydrants be provided along Trunk Highway 149 on the
north and south side of the building.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this site is proposed from
Lone Oak Parkway in two different locations. The northerly entrance
is proposed as a right in - right out entrance only. The southerly
entrance is shown entering into Outlot A.
The City contracted to have an independent traffic consultant study
the traffic circulation along Lone Oak Parkway. The results of the
study recommend moving the major access to the proposed development
approximately 230 ffet west of where currently proposed. The site
will have to be redesigned in accordance with this recommendation.
M
ASSESSMENTS: The parcels that make up this proposed development
have been assessed in the following manner:
Project # Description Usage
12 Sanitary Sewer Trunk -
12 Water Area C/I
12 (A) Water Area C/I
302 Storm Sewer Trunk C/I
302 (B) Storm Sewer Trunk Multi
(A) Parcel #10-00200-010-75 864 acres (3.27 X .8) assessed.
(B) Parcel #10-00200-020-75 assessed @ multi
PENDING ASSESSMENTS: None
PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a
condition of final plat approval:
Project # Description Usage Rate Qty. Amount
12 (1) Water Area C/I 3,170/Ac 1/3 Ac $1,057
12 (2) Add'l. Water Area C/I 3,170/Ac 1.72 Ac 5,444
$6,501
(1) Area east of the section line i.e. amount that is in Section 1
(2) Balance 10-00200-010-75 which was not previously fully assessed
for water area
The above assessments are for only those areas going to Lot 1 of the
proposed Blue Ridge Addition.
In addition, there are additional assessments due on Outlot B when
that develops.. 125,000 S.F. of Outlot B, that which was 10-00200-
020-75 was assessed storm sewer trunk at the multi residential rate.
The portion of Outlot B that is the remainder of 10-00200-010-75 has
an additional obligation for water area that is approximately 1.98
acres.
The final assessment rates shall be those in effect at the time of
final plat approval based on final plat area and frontage
calculations.
BLUE RIDGE CONDITIONS:
1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
2. No fan units shall be usable.
3. A landscape planting plan will be required with the final plat
submission. The financial guarantee shall not be released
until after one year from the date of installation.
4. 9' wide parking stalls shall be approved.
5. A lighting plan shall be submitted. No direct light source
shall be visable from Highway 149 or the public streets.
6. Shall be subject to a parks dedication fee.
7. The developer shall submit an approved retaining wall design
prior to final plat approval.
8. The "storm sewer trunk by others" shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with City standards prior to final
plat approval.
9. The developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of the
internal storm sewer system.
10. The developer shall submit an acceptable erosion/sediment
control plan prior to final plat approval.
11. The 8" water main along the easterly side of the development
shall be located within Outlot A.
12. A 20 foot utility easement shall be provided for the proposed
8" water main along the southerly side of Lot 1.
13. Two additional hydrants shall be located along the north and
south side of the proposed building.
14. The development shall move its major access point approximately
230 west of where currently proposed.
15. The proposed development shall be responsible for obtaining the
appropriate Department of Health permit for water main
extensions.
16. The development shall be responsible for obtaining the
necessary down stream ponding easements.
17. Noafan units shall be visable.
18. A landscape planting plan will be required with the final plat
submission. The financial guarantee shall not be released
until after one year from the date of installation. `
19• 9' wide parking stalls shall be approved.
20. A lighting plan shall be submitted. No direct light source
shall be visable from Highway 149 or the public streets.
Shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. — 113
l J/Ij ��O 1 'fir �•' it (I I � �-'" ��t
::..• t_•, _v i \%ice•%� r ` ^�
! 1--
T,!,;r
CL F
any�,--
� - ' �`• _ : 'a 111 � :�"r' -•;: •':,- o, q,^
LJ
FT; 177
!�. 11-1, .• m�,"� W'�N`m
1 1 ■ !:r '_aL, e 4_ i i!3 a -'
=a
LLJ
.( I' I ••111 I I _ �•�� � ��
cc
Vv
� � fin. a--•
471 10, 4
�
I I ,` •' 'r� �; � - :. _ 644
LL
_ W
P,''
ur ,
w3�
�O,cg'
��
<
<im
<
< � aaaar� oaaaa
aaaad aaaap� a aaaae
�F^-
—
---
A
;•^�
acuE•
JI
N p
d
a
z
N
V
>
<
3
/}f
—� O
-
3
I
N
CV cu
U N
3 Y
J
g u ;moo- ;mos-
;ase '
IN Lal1 a
cu
ILL.J
Q
=o
471 10, 4
�
I I ,` •' 'r� �; � - :. _ 644
D
LL
_ W
P,''
ur ,
w3�
�O,cg'
off, ... •.
D
LL
ooL$-
w3�
.a
C-
W
U N
4 a!
�''•ai'1L:..
J
Q Q n lC
O H O
(11 LL
G
cC.)u. O'
N v
r
cr
cc
_
Of'f
n
c O m
Q O
9
:I
d
a
N vi N
W
N e
G
�• - y
N
J
J
°
O
W • a
Y N Q m
0
CC
`
1
O O
J J
c
e
l
A
a, OJ O O
d O O O
i /
C-
.....,{`...........fir'
... e`�MU
I I1
cc
W
Il6�ilt
I
I'
i' Ox
WA59Na7 WVV"
3NO 3SVHd )IVO 3NOl
NV -1d BUS NOISN3WIO
i•
V..
I O
CM
wo aY� Q
D Q ¢<a O
N �O iz a
4,,54- 37)
6j-
N n�.. x� •u.ou •xx..�•-. - • xa o 3wnar rix..Yxl
♦o •• .rr •alisiior •iio Yox.r v ra•
`JNitl33Ni0N3
Q DNWN tlOd5NVtl1
7NINNY Id
N
vlosarwiw NvOIG
3N0 3SVHd NVO 9NO-1
- J
} �= 3� 3 •7 � '. r w
a°�_Sa���
w
ff S :sir,; Q _ Q •�• �{,1�fS
E � Ir
�1�!
!!! .1
ilf!�M
1
1
w
,
3
Wz
NH'Id 3dVOSaNd 1
�
J
W
�`ilER 3"h's'c�1
Z
lxi a: 5= ~ :i 3 •Sys
1
R E
e
L
F
A
O
O O
V O N
N
m
0
b
Y ! GRADING AND DRAINAGE LONE OAK PHASE ONE
zLn EAGAN, MINNESOTA p1
3
mPLANNING
ry TRANSPORTATION p
rll [SSSi�i�J �Oi IMI' ENGINEERING Z
fff L' Y ARCNITECTORE
1 i LM NN[TT, Ill :�i o{e, ww�nn...... I`. p....... l.o.
0
SANITARY SEWER
AND WATERMAIN
Z02`
iIt
m
I
1
h
LONE OAK PHASE ONE
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
N
PUNNING
TRJNSOORIATION 0
ENGINEERING z
ARL NiTEGfURE
P,•i� •wrT Yr n[a �C rhIIL10 •lLO. J•r•e•, 0••Gr!•'I N
•1. •., r •lO II •, r• • _
C:
a
a
Z:
WATER AREA 0.33 AC.
ADDITIONAL WATER AREA 1.72 AC
NW COr. 01 SW 1/4,SW 1/4
SOC. 1, T 27. R 23
.s a9'40'15'W
xz�
0.90
a9'2444')Y
ft
W
_�,- M------_ _ ------------�--- ;- --IVE — T
TFNTfSTN 494
I-494
DITOR
S31 (I z
23.3%50.(,
39.
7.0
811
KOC L'O6K1'S
e _9�jrss.o 5 t l 16 )�
IL T
��
6 1611 --_- — --
e• .4901211 ,
`r 57.4/ 85.0
18. !43.j17� .0LEX
PARK
V
i
osill
'u
�/
EAGANDA
5.8/80.0 II 71.5/9V
DIE T AL K........ I2
`. r7s.�O szb 71.2 o
"� LO. 15 AK gIROA 14 ' ,1 _ ..... 11
IY�
wr 16 �., - 16 ! n x 26 I _
'2.4/85.0 10 50.0/76.0
1611 ! ' • �� AUDITORS j
10 �Ep - 92.i lj`� S SIAIE
18" . 6At fif: ! �i 'T r "i f I I�-. r Is"sT �5 112"''• ` ` S r o Y # 55 \ .,
_.—. 52 513 54 i II i� I v F
51.2/7 .0 675/91.0 670f SILleg
1 - NO. 38
u 51 2.3 77. \�
1 u ACRESILI
' '`'rc'•;
i
8 � :EBUR OA
;1
----
50.3/75.0 I i i I -- f% �' •.` \ }PARKJll
4g -r
i --....
�� 16 f \ 24� _'= - <_UTH DEI -'A
/I +A,II�I},T'l1m. HILLS
i8 N
72.0
��
72
51,47 .0 1-'-
7 u 56.4/76.0 ','l
'�r:,•_� ,
61.5/8.0.0 676/86.0 , 49.6/66.0 7.5/43.0 20.°----------
iter. A » 2R 18" 20"c..._.._._ . 1�`'J2d' 63 z4u 62 4' PHEfi E�lGd
BLUE RIDGE ADD.
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG.3 city of eagan WATER approved standard
PUBLIC plate #:
WORKS
co
D PARTMEN MASTER PLA
— 1
N
/7
APC Minutes
April 28, 1987
16. This development shall extend the 6 inch water lateral to
the west property line for continuation of service.
17. This development shall be responsible for the installation
of an 8 foot bituminous trail along Duckwood Drive.
18. The developer, Mr. Applebaum and the Colon brothers, shall
meet with City staff to determine the best access location prior to
the City Council meeting, which for this proposal shall be May 19,
1987, in order to provide for time.
19. Staff shall meet with the neighbors to the south to discuss
the plantings and screening between the two developments.
All voted affirmatively.
BLUE RIDGE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
The•last public hearing convened by Chairman Hall was in regard
to the application of L. A. Laukka Development for a preliminary
plat of Blue Ridge Addition which will be a replat of Outlots E and
F of Lone Oak Addition, into a 9.8 acre lot for an office/showroom
and two outlots containing 37.25 acres abutting Highway #149 to the
west, with Lone Oak Road to the south. Mr. Runkle presented the
application indicating that proof of parking would be provided due
to the slight shortage being proposed. 21% lot coverage was being
requested in an area designated Light Industrial where 35% is
allowed. It was indicated that the proposal was similar to the
Silver Bell Center proposal and that a traffic study done in-house
suggested that the accesses off Lone Oak Road were too close
together.
Mr. Dale Beck of BR4++T was present and discussed green space,
utilities, parking, and landscaping. He indicated Mr. Rick Berger
of Laukka-Beck was also present. Mr. Beck suggested that due to the
curvature in the road, the traffic report was in error in regard to
the distance between the two accesses. He indicated he would
request approval subject to staff review regarding the traffic
safety issues. An owner across the road from the property was
present and indicated his approval.
McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
2. No fan units shall be visable.
3. A landscape planting plan shall be required with the final
plat submission. The financial guarantee shall not be released
until after one year from the date of installation.
APC Minutes
April 28, 1987
4. 9 foot wide parking stalls shall be approved.
5. A lighting plan shall be submitted. No direct light source
shall be visable from Highway #149 or the public streets.
6. The plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee.
7. The developer shall submit an approved retaining wall design
prior to final plat approval.
8. The "storm sewer trunk by others" shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with City standards prior to issuance of
any building permits.
9. The developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of
the internal storm sewer system.
10. The developer shall submit an acceptable erosion/sediment
control plan prior to final plat approval.
11. The 8 inch water main along the easterly side of the
development shall be located within Outlot A.
12. A 20 foot utility easement shall be provided for the
proposed 8 inch water main along the southerly side of Lot 1.
13. Two additional hydrants shall be located along the north
and south side of the proposed building.
14. The development shall move its major access point
approximately 230 feet west of where currently proposed.
15. The proposed development shall be responsible for obtaining
the appropriate Department of Health permit for water main
extensions.
16. The development shall be responsible for obtaining the
necessary down stream ponding easements.
17. The developer shall work with City staff to resolve the
access issue. This item shall be considered at the May 19, 1987
council meeting to allow discussion between developer and staff.
All voted in favor.
ADJOURNMENT
Wilkins moved, McCrea seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting
at 12:00 midnight. All voted in favor.
DGK
Secretary - APC(
/l�
B. C'HART
PHILIP L. BRUNER
TIMOTHY M. O'BRIEN
DENNIS M. COYNE
JAMES W. LITTLEFIELD
STEVEN Z. KAPLAN
SUE HALVERSON
TIMOTHY R. THORNTON
STEPHEN L. WILSON
NILS F GROSSMAN
JAMES F. MEWBORN
BARBARA JEAN EYAQUILA
PATRICK J. O'CONNOR, JR.
PETER C. HALLS
EINAR E. HANSON
PETER E. HAPKE
PAUL T. MEYER
THOMAS J. VOLLBRECHT
LAW OFFICES
HART, BRUNER, O'BRIEN & THORNTON
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
1221 NICOLLET MALL, SUITE 700
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403
May 5, 1987
City Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: Wacovia Board Item
City Council Meeting of May 19, 1987
Dear Chairman and City Council Members:
TELEPHONE (612) 332-1431
TELECOPIER (612) 332-7221
HAND DELIVERED
Our office represents NWA, Inc. (the parent company of
Northwest Airlines). We have been working with the City
regarding development of Northwest's World headquarters site in
Eagan. At the urging of the City staff, Northwest is studying
the traffic impacts of its proposed development, taking into
consideration the development plans of Wacovia and Cray Research.
Northwest has hired a -traffic consultant and is spending
significant time and resources to address traffic issues.
Northwest is generally aware that Cray Research is proposing
a master plan for development of its parcel. We were not
specifically aware that Cray had actually submitted a master plan
for review by City staff and we were surprised today to learn
that City staff had met on May 3 with representatives of Cray
Research regarding their proposed development plans. A copy of
Cray's submittal to the City has,not been provided to us, so we
have asked the attorney for Cray Research to provide us a copy of
the submission.
Obviously, Northwest should.be kept informed as to the
development plans of Cray Research and Wacovia. Only with timely
notice by the City staff of proposed development plans can
Northwest be informed and be in a position to answer the
comprehensive traffic questions that the City staff has asked
Northwest to consider.
HART, BRUNER, O'BRIEN & THORNTON
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page 2
In the course of conversations today with City staff, we
learned for the first time that Wacovia has been to the City
Planning Commission and received approval of plans for a
warehouse and office space. Apparently, Wacovia has not been
asked to address the traffic impacts associated with this
proposed development, other than the roadway alignments and other
such engineering details. Wacovia should not be given approval
for the development of its warehouse and office plans, without
being directed to cooperate with Northwest and Cray Research in
an overall assessment of traffic demands for the entire site.
Northwest remains ready to address the traffic impacts of
its proposed development and to do so in the context of the
development plans of Cray Research and Wacovia. It is
fundamentally unfair, however, for the City staff to require only
Northwest to make such a comprehensive assessment of traffic
impacts. Wacovia and Cray should also be directed to address
traffic impacts and to cooperate with Northwest in the overall
assessment.
Northwest specifically asked the City Council to do the
following:
1. As a special condition of any plans by Wacovia for
warehouse and office space, require Wacovia to assess
the traffic impacts associated with all its development
plans and to do so in cooperation with Northwest and
Cray Research.
2. Provide written notice to Northwest of any and all
submittals to the City staff regarding development plans
by Cray Research and Wacovia, or any other developer on
the Laukka-Beck tract, and provide Northwest with an
opportunity to participate in the review and comment of
all proposed plans.
Northwest asks to be treated fairly and to be given timely
notice of development plans for the entire Laukka-Beck tract.
Iq(a
HART, BRUNER, O'BRIEN & THORNTON
City Council
May 5, 1987
Page 3
Northwest should only be asked to study traffic impacts, if Cray
Research and Wacovia have been asked to do the same.
TRT:llh
cc: S. Schwanke
S. Wheeler
J. Shardlow
Sincerely,
Timothy R. Thornton
Iq'
Agenda Information Memo
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Four
GAMBLING LICENSE/PULL-TABS AT RICHARDS FOOD AND LIQUOR
A. Gambling License for Pull -Tabs at Richards Food and Liquor for
St. Joseph's Home for Children --The City has received a request from
St. Joseph's Home for Children which is located in Minneapolis for a
charitable gambling license at Richard's Food and Liquor. The
proceeds for this program will benefit St. Joseph's Home for
Children, an agency of Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St.
Paul and Minneapolis. The applicant was made aware of the required
ratio of local versus national charitable gambling licenses for
pull -tabs. It is stated in the body of the proposal that "256 of
our members who contribute to the support of St. Joseph's are Eagan
residents" and further that "we have staff and volunteers in our
programs who live in Eagan. Presently, the City has one local
gambling license which is the Eagan Lion's Club for pull -tabs at
Cedarvale Lanes and there is a national organization, the MS
Society, that has pull -tabs at Valley Lounge. The City has recently
denied City of Hope at Richard's Food and Liquor and Camp New Hope
at the Eagan Tap due to their non -local charitable status.
This item is in order for consideration by the City Council and
action is required prior to May 26 or the Gambling Control Board
will take action on that date.
Enclosed is a copy of a letter, the rental agreement and proposal as
submitted by St. Jose h's Home for Children, this information is
referenced as pages ` "� � through /S'S� Also enclosed on page/ls o
is a copy of a letter received May 15 from the Supervisor of Family
Based Services at Dakota County in support of this application.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
charitable gambling license for Richard's Food and Liquor as applied
for by St. Joseph's Home for Children based on the evidence provided
to the City Council that' this is considered a local charitable
gambling license.
May 8, 1987
Mr. Tom Hedges
City Administrator
Eagan City Hall
3820 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges,
ST. JOSEPH'S
EMERGENCY SHELTER
RESIDENTIAL & DAY TREATMENT
DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION
At the suggestion of Gene Van Overbeke I am forwarding this
proposal to you and ask that it be considered for the Eagan City
Council agenda on Tuesday May 19th..
Fran and Tom Winkel will be presenting the request for a charitable
gambling license at Richard's Food and Liquor in Eagan. The
proceeds from the program will benefit St. Joseph's Home for
Children, an agency of Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of
St. Paul and Minneapolis.
The Winkels are both active in our organization, as are other
Eagan residents. Tom sits on the Corporate Board of Catholic
Charities and Fran is Special Events Chairperson for St. Joseph's
Annual Fund Steering Committee. Their knowledge of St. Joseph's,
its services and the extensive area it serves, make them well-
suited to answer any questions the council members may have.
We are in the process of applying to the state and hope to be
considered at the Gambling Control Board meeting on May 26th,
so timing is critical.
Please contact me at 827-6241 when the agenda is set, or if you
have any further questions.
Sincerely,
v
Ellen Hatfield
Associate Director of Development
1121 EAST 46TH STREET ® MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407 ■ (612) 827-6241
Accredited by the Council on Accreditation of Services for Fam' i ildren. Supported through private contributions, contrails for services and grants.
r 1q9)
RENTAL AGREEMENT
This Agreement, made and entered this 30th day of April , 19 87
by and between Richard Stariha (Owner) doing business at the address
Richard's Food & Liquor
of 4185 S. Robert Trail (Bar and Address) in the City/County of
Eagan 55123 , hereinafter called FIRST PARTY, and
St. Joseph's Homefor Children/a division of
Catholic Charities of the Arch- (.Organization), 1121 East 46th Street
diocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis
(Street and Box Number), Minneapolis 55407 (City), hereinafter
called SECOND PARTY,
WITNESSETH:
1. First Party, being the owner and operator of business premises, for
an_d in consideration of the sum of $ _-AU—.__per month and other con-
sideration hereinafter recited, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
does hereby grant to Second Party for- the period of June 1 , 1 287
th.rough June 1..: 1 988_ the right to locate, on the business premises
games of chance devices consisting of those legal in the state of Minnesota,
such devices to be located on the business premises where designated by
First Party. First. party -shall have no interest in the outcome of such
games of chance.
2. Second Party shall pay First Party a monthly rental fee, which shall
be a sum sufficient to provide for adequate rental of space. Either
party may notify the Other if said party wishes to renegotiate the ex-
isting rental fee. Negotiation of rental fees shall in no way reflect upon
the variance of monthly gross proceeds of the games of chance but shall
be contingent upon actual space usage incurred by the games of chance
and the patrons thereof. Any amendments to this lease must be furnished
to the Charitable Gambling Control Board at least 10 days prior to the
effecti.ye date of the change. I:f said amendment would cause loss of
license, it shall be negated .
3. Both parties will comply with all Federal, State, and Local Laws
r
pertaining to the conduct of games of chance.
4. First Party,agrees that only one eligible organization at a time
may operate on the above stated premises and that this premises shall
be subject to rules adopted by the state of Minnesota
5. This agreement may be terminated upon the giving of thirty (30)
days votive by either party, said notice to be in writing.
6. Brief description of the general area leased by the Second Party:
A space approximately 6' x 9' at the end and to the left of
the bar as you enter.
0
7. The signing of th%s agreement signifies nullification of any previous
agreements made 5y and between First and Scconl. Party or by and between
First Party and any other eligible organization for the purposes of con-
ducting games of chance.
IN WI:TNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hand the day
and year first above written.
FIRST PARTY; April 30, 1987
pate
Date
SECOND PARTY: April 30 1987
Date
/S/
X
K Or d 11 r"
EN
ON,
-,Qe,p--,,, ea1
)9
cl�
ST. JOSEPH'S
EMERGENCY SHELTER
RESIDENTIAL & DAY TREATMENT
DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION
Proposal Submitted To Eagan City Council
by
St. Joseph's Home for Children
1121 East 46th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55407
Contact Person: Ellen Hatfield
827-6241
1121 EAST 46TH STREET ® MINNEAPOLIS MN 55407 ® (612) 827-6241
Accredited by the Council on Accreditation of Services for Families and Children. Supported through private contributions, contracts for services and grants.
/.S t3
ST. JOSEPH'S
EMERGENCY SHELTER
RESIDENTIAL & DAY TREATMENT
DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION
St. Joseph's Home for Children is an emergency shelter and resi-
dential treatment center for children of all denominations who
are abused, abandoned, neglected or emotionally disturbed. The
goal of the agency is to promote growth in troubled families
and children by providing a therapeutic environment;' which
offers respect, security, opportunity and hope.
St. Joseph's is a division of Catholic Charities of St. Paul and
Minneapolis, and primarily serves twelve counties including
Hennepin, Ramsey, Dakota, Scott, Washington, Goodhue, LeSueur,
Carver, Wright, Anoka, Chisago and Rice.
Programs include emergency shelter for children whose families
are in crisis and who need temporary care; day treatment for
children with learning disabilities and emotional problems who
need specialized education and therapy; residential treatment
for children whose emotional and family problems are so severe
that they require out -of -home placement for an extended period
of 6 to 8 months; and shelter/diagnostic for children outside of
our host county who require shelter*or diagnostic evaluation.
Dakota County Social Services places children in both residential
treatment and in the emergency shelter/diagnostic unit. Children
placed in the 11 -bed shelter/diagnostic unit are generally chil-
dren whose problems are so severe or whose family situation is
too dangerous to allow them to remain in the home. Following
a 14 or 30 -day diagnostic evaluation, the multi -disciplinary
team makes recommendations to county social services for appro-
priate placements in a treatment program, group home or foster
care.
We are seeing an increasing number of children from Dakota County
in this program. Based on the first four months of 1987, pro-
jections for the year indicate an 85% increase over 1986 in the
number of children referred by Dakota County Social Services
(13 children in 1986; 8 children through April 30, 1987).
The shelter/diagnostic unit was opened in 1984 at the request of
1121 EAST 46TH STREET ■ MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407 ® (612) 827-6241
- Accredited by the Council on Accreditation of Services for Families j Children. Supported through private contributions, contracts for services and grants.
counties surrounding the Twin Cities who were in need of shelter
and diagnostic care. It is part of our effort to broaden our
services to offer assistance to cities and townships outside
of Minneapolis and St. Paul. The residential program has always
been open to children from throughout our service area and beyond.
Last year we served children from 36 counties, including Dakota.
our primary source of support comes from per diem payments made
by the referring counties. With the reduction in federal, state
and county budgets, per diem reimbursements no longer cover our
operating expenses. We are forced to go to the private sector
for contributions in order to continue to operate.
Currently, 256 of our members who contribute to the support of
St. Joseph's are Eagan residents. In addition, we have staff
and volunteers in our programs who live in Eagan. A case can
certainly be made that we are a service to Eagan.
Charitable gambling is a new venture for
to enhance the quality of our programs,
variety of fundraising vehicles which we
to broaden our base of support to enable
for hundreds of children who are brought
desperate need of help.
us and will enable us
It is only one of a
are currently developing
us to continue to care
to us each year in
Eagan businessman Richard Stariha has agreed to allow us to locate
in his restaurant, Richard's Food and Liquor, 4185 South -Robert
Trail. The sale of pull -tabs would be managed by a paid staff
member of St. Joseph's Home for Children.
In addition to St. Joseph's Home for Children, Catholic Charities
provides other services to Eagan and Dakota County residents,
including training of small group leaders in eight Dakota County
parishes including St. John Neumann in Eagan and Mary, Mother of
the Church; family counseling services located in Hastings;
support groups for separated and divorced in Apple Valley, Burns-
ville, and Hastings; aging programs such as Senior Recognition
Masses, retreats, grief and loss groups, and collaboration with
D.A.R..Tranport, the Dakota area referral and transportaion pro-
gram for seniors.
In addition to services located in Dakota County, Catholic Charities
has programs for unwed mothers, adoptive parents, mentally retarded
adults, and family counseling which are available to persons
living in the 12 -county Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis.
Please give this proposal your serious consideration. The license
application will be considered at the May 26th meeting of the
Minnesota Gambling Control Board and we are confident that it
will be approved. With the approval of the Eagan City Council,
we would plan to begin operations no later than June 15, 1987.
DAKOTA COUNTY (612) 450-2611
May 13, 1987
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION 33 EAST WENTWORTH, WEST ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55118
REPLY TO:
D Human Services Director, (612) 450-2742
0 Public Health Nursing Service
O Social Services
D Planning (612) 450-2742
744 -19th Ave. North
900 West 128th Street
O Employment 8 Economic Assistance,
South St. Paul, MN 55075
Burnsville, MN 55337
(612) 450-2611
(612) 455-2291
(612) 887-1577
0 Public Health, (612) 450-2614
O Public Health Nursing Service
O Social Services, (612) 450-2677
1101 West County Road 42
O Veteran's Services, (612) 450-2601
Burnsville, MN 55337
33 East Wentworth
(612) 435-8055
West St. Paul, MN 55118
Tom Hedges, City Administrator
Eagan City Hall
3820 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
This is a letter of support for St. Joseph Home for Children's request for
money through charitable gambling in Eagan.
Our staff use the facilities at St. Joseph's, especially their shelter program,
to help Dakota County families deal with problems such as truancy, running
away, emotional disturbance, domestic violence and child abuse and neglect. A
short term shelter placement of the child out of the home is often necessary
to stabilize a crisis situation, evaluate the nature of the child's and
family's disturbance and plan for the child's return home in a way that will
maintain the child at home in the future.
Space for such shelter placements is often limited within our county, and we
frequently need to use facilities outside Dakota County. St. Joseph's provides
us with an option for shelter, evaluation and treatment that is relatively
close to the families we serve in Eagan and capable of safely providing
comprehensive care to troubled youth.
Sincerely,
Anthony A. Bibus
Supervisor, Family Based Services
AAB:tlt
cc: Ellen Hatfield, St. Joseph Children's Home
Patrick Coyne, Manager, Children and Family Section,
Dakota County Social Services
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Five
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PYLON SIGNAGE FORQ PETROLEUM
B. Conditional Use Permit for Q Petroleum for a Pylon Sign in the
Rahncliff Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory
Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on April 30,
1987, to consider an application submitted by Q -Petroleum and M.G.
Astleford for two (2) pylon signs along Cliff Road in the Rahncliff
1st Addition. The APC is recommending approval of both pylon signs.
Enclosed on pages / 58 through L� is a copy of 'the Planning
Department report on this item.
Also enclosed on page is a copy of the APC minutes on this
item.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
conditional use permit for pylon signs as submitted by Q Petroleum
and M.G. Astleford.
/S 7
i41
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PYLON SIGNS)
APPLICANT: Q - PETROLEUM
LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, RAHN CLIFF 1ST ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: RB (ROADSIDE BUSINESS)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 30, 1987 A
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 20, 1987 - =1
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted by
Q -Petroleum and M.G. Astleford requesting two pylon signs along
Cliff Road on Lot 1, Block 1, Rahn Cliff 1st Addition.
The first sign is 8' wide,
27' tall and
has 120
S.F. of signage
area. This interior lighted pylon will
serve the muffler shop,
Rapid Oil Change and Big Wheel Auto Parts
Store.
Code permits 125
S.F. per side and a 27' maximum height. .
The second sign is for the Q
Superette and
car wash
that is attached
to the auto center. This
pylon would
have 66
square feet of
interior lighted signage.
The height is
undetermined
but should
match the other sign if both
are approved.
:.t
East of Lot 1 is Outlot D
that has over
500' of
street frontage
along Cliff Road. These
proposed signs
would
not effect the .,'1;$,,,-.
opportunity for that area to
have additional pylon
signage.
.If approved, these pylon' signs shall be subject to:
1. A 27' maximum height.
2. No additional signage area other than this proposal without
another public hearing.
3. To all other applicable Sign Ordinances.
4. The.one time sign fee of $2.50/square foot.
sq. TUBE
/ (CLIFFRCIAD). ILLUM, P(LO
i u►1.{ars r�..rr,.
-SINGLE FAGE ILLUA4.
1!6<A #ATID.SIGHS
1
1 � 4WtI�HK! Afd' 1
1 .1
1
('. 1 resat y ;
' (Z) C-• C=� - - AP i
CAA WASH' ;MEINEK BIG WHEEL �' 100.1
1 �:.` a,a•I `: MUFFLE.• CHANhE 1
1 1 �..
I
cra u:r ansaMcsmc•ru d 1 1
0"4~
. 1 1
1- 1 -
° • ��• . . '• %� D
"�r
SUPERETTE
I mewm�wr • � G
86' 1-----r-------T;---------- ---------- -------- ----------- -- --- i
tv d bd•J W, d d Q•
CALE::1L 40''O� �
�RAHNCLIFF COURT
A^p10 OIL,
t
? M.AtRl PEe
I
�
M-
Rao q
AAUGT 5
Ole
AWM. C BIAIE
BLACK CAR
SUPGRETT6 &ey
t
t
_
L-577
. .
� --
EWa
LS
'
9
13uFa?Ru�L:: f Awg;.. LUS.
sq. TUBE
/ (CLIFFRCIAD). ILLUM, P(LO
i u►1.{ars r�..rr,.
-SINGLE FAGE ILLUA4.
1!6<A #ATID.SIGHS
1
1 � 4WtI�HK! Afd' 1
1 .1
1
('. 1 resat y ;
' (Z) C-• C=� - - AP i
CAA WASH' ;MEINEK BIG WHEEL �' 100.1
1 �:.` a,a•I `: MUFFLE.• CHANhE 1
1 1 �..
I
cra u:r ansaMcsmc•ru d 1 1
0"4~
. 1 1
1- 1 -
° • ��• . . '• %� D
"�r
SUPERETTE
I mewm�wr • � G
86' 1-----r-------T;---------- ---------- -------- ----------- -- --- i
tv d bd•J W, d d Q•
CALE::1L 40''O� �
�RAHNCLIFF COURT
A^p10 OIL,
t
V`
�
M-
AAUGT 5
AWM. C BIAIE
sq. TUBE
/ (CLIFFRCIAD). ILLUM, P(LO
i u►1.{ars r�..rr,.
-SINGLE FAGE ILLUA4.
1!6<A #ATID.SIGHS
1
1 � 4WtI�HK! Afd' 1
1 .1
1
('. 1 resat y ;
' (Z) C-• C=� - - AP i
CAA WASH' ;MEINEK BIG WHEEL �' 100.1
1 �:.` a,a•I `: MUFFLE.• CHANhE 1
1 1 �..
I
cra u:r ansaMcsmc•ru d 1 1
0"4~
. 1 1
1- 1 -
° • ��• . . '• %� D
"�r
SUPERETTE
I mewm�wr • � G
86' 1-----r-------T;---------- ---------- -------- ----------- -- --- i
tv d bd•J W, d d Q•
CALE::1L 40''O� �
�RAHNCLIFF COURT
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING - EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
APRIL 30, 1987
A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was
held on Thursday, April 30, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal
Center. Present were Chairman Hall, Members Gustafson, Trygg, and
Wilkins. Absent were Members Krisnik, McCrea, Voracek and Harrison.
Also present were City Planner Dale Runkle, Public Works Director
Tom Colbert, Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch and Assistant
City Attorney David Keller.
AGENDA
It was noted that the applicant for Parkwood Presbyterian Church
had withdrawn their application. Also, that an informal
presentation had been requested for the end of the meeting in regard
to Eagan Hills Farm. Wilkins moved, Gustafson seconded the motion
to recommend approval of the agenda as prepared by staff, with the
two exceptions described above. All voted in favor.
,Q=PETROLEUM 'CONDITIONAL USE':' -PERMITS
Chairman Hall convened the first public hearing of the evening
in regard to.the applications of Q -Petroleum and M.G. Astleford for
two pylon signs along Cliff Road on Lot 1, Block 1, Rahn Cliff 1st
Addition. Mr. Runkle introduced the proposal which included a 27
foot tall, 8 foot wide, and 120 square foot interior lighted pylon
sign for tenants in the development. The second sign was for the Q-
Superette and Car Wash consisting of 66 square feet of signage and
interior lighting. No one from the public was present to address
this issue. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend
approval of conditional use permits for two pylon signs subject to
the following conditions:
1. There shall be a 27 foot maximum height.
2. No additional signage area other than this proposal shall be
allowed without another public hearing.
3. The conditional use permit for pylon signs shall be subject
to all other applicable Sign Ordinances.
4. This conditional use permit shall be subject to the one-time
sign fee of $2.50 per square foot.
All voted in favor.
/6
m
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Six
REZONING COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR LEXINGTON POINTE 2ND ADDITION -
C. Lexington Pointe 2nd Addition - Tri -Land Properties - an
Amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development, a Rezoning of
57.6 Acres from CSC to a PD R-1, a Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 169 Lots --A public
hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their
last regular meeting held on April 30 to consider applications
submitted by Tri -Land Properties requesting an amendment to the
Lexington South PD, a rezoning of 57.6 acres from CSC to PD R-1, a
Comprehensvie Guide Plan amendment and a preliminary plat entitled
Lexington Pointe 2nd Addition consisting of 169 lots. The APC is
recommending approval of all applications.
For additional information on these applications, refer to the
enclosed report as prepared by the Planning and Engineering
Departments found on pages (oP, through _1%a .
The parkland dedication was satisfied as a specia agreement with
the Lexington South PUD. Enclosed on pages l?,3-'17 s a copy of the
APRC recommendations regarding trailways.
For additional information on this item, refer to the APC minutes, a
copy is enclosed on pages _� 5 through Ll _Z.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) an
amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development, 2) a rezoning
of 57.6 acres from CSC to PD R-1, 3) a Comprehensive Guide Plan
amendment and 4) a preliminary plat entitled Lexington Pointe 2nd
Addition.
CITY OF EAGAN
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, REZONING,
SUBJECT.- COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, AND
PRELIMINARY PLAT (LEXINGTON POINTE 2ND ADDITION)
APPLICANT: TRI -LAND PROPERTIES
LOCATION: NE4 SECTION 26
EXISTING ZONING: CSC WITHIN LEXINGTON SOUTH PD
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 30 APRIL 1987
DATE OF REPORT: 21 APRIL 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINNERING
APPLICATIONS: Seperate applications have been submitted by Tri -Land
Properties requesting an Amendment to the Lexington South P.D.,
a Rezoning of 57.6 acres from CSC (Community Shopping Center)
within the Lexington South P.D. to a P.D. R-1 (Single Family)
District, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Preliminary
Plat consisting of 169 lots located south of Diffley Road just
west of the Northview Meadows area.
COMMENTS: The site is surrounded by unplatted R-3 land, Northview
Meadow Additions and the Lexington Pointe 1ST Addition to the
north and east. The Highline Trail/Parkland and CSC (Community
Shopping Center) designated property is to the south and west
respectively. The north/south NSP Powerline acts as the western
property line.
This 57.6 acre/169 lot proposal has a gross density of 2.93 units/
acre and net density of 3.66 units/acre. The lots range in size
from 10,500 sq. ft. to. 19,250 sq. ft. - averaging 11,870 sq.
ft.. The minimum lot width is 73' at the setback line. Since
the Lexington South P.D. allows sideyard setbacks of 15' between
buildings no additional sideyard variances should be allowed.
The- corner lots are larger than most and will easily accomodate
the 30' setback required along both streets.
GRADING/ DRAINAGE: The land within the proposed development has
rolling open topography with very little or no mature vegetation.
The site has elevation differentials of approximately 30'+/-. The
greatest elevation differentials occur in the southeast corner of
the proposed development.
Due to the inadequate preliminary design of the proposed storm sewer
facilities, only a conceptual analysis of the system can be
performed at this time. The development proposes backyard drainage
for Blocks 4-6. The development proposes to drain its easterly
portion into the proposed ponding area in the center of Lexington
Pointe 1st Addition. The outlet for this ponding area is proposed~
as a condition of final plat approval of Lexington Pointe 1st
Addition.- The development is proposing a ponding area westerly of
Lots 1-8, Block 3,' as a part of this development. The ponding is
proposed to handle the runoff generated by the southwesterly portion
of the development. The outlet for this ponding area is also the
ponding area in the center of L Pointe 1st Addition.
No erosion/ sediment control plan was submitted with this
application.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth is
readily available through the existing 10" subtrunk located in
Daniel Drive. Internal lateral collection systems will provide
individual service to the proposed lots.
Water service to this proposed development is readily available
through the existing 12" water main located within Daniel Drive.
Internal lateral facilities can be extended to provide service to
the individual lots. To provide maximum flexibility for the future
commercial land use, this 12" trunk water main will have to be
extended westerly within Lexington Pointe Parkway to the existing
CSC zoned property. Subsequently, this is not considered a trunk
water main but the lateral necessary to service the future
commercial uses and shall be the full responsibility of this
development.
It is felt that a firm commitment for the future use of the westerly
adjacent property through a rezoning is necessary to properly design
the utility services to their most economical and efficient use.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this proposed development is
readily available through the recent completion of Daniel Drive and
the proposed Lexington Pointe 1st Addition. However, when Daniel
Drive was installed as a condition of the Northview Meadows 2nd
Addition, it was understood that any future development would
require its northerly extension and connection to Diffley Road. The
location of this Daniel Drive intersection with Diffley Road must be
in a location approved by the Dakota County Highway Department to
ensure proper spacing between major intersections, taking into
consideration the commercial property to the west, the elementary
and future high school sites to the north, and the future Braddock
Trail extension to the Stafford Place Addition in the northeast.
The County will allow one major access onto Diffley Road between
Lexington Avenue and Braddock Trail. The development appears to be
extending Daniel Drive westerly to a point just south of the
westerly entrance to Northview Elementary School, then north to
Diffley Road. This location is acceptable to Dakota County for a
major access point. A secondary access to Diffley Road will be
allowed at the approximate westerly boundary of the proposed
development. The intersection of Daniel Drive and the north -south
connection to Diffley Road shall be a "T" configuration.
/6�
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development shall ensure that
a full 80' right-of-way dedication is provided for Daniel Drive to
its County approved intersections with Diffley Road.
Lexington Pointe Parkway is to be designed with an 80' right-of-way
dedication. All other internal streets within this proposed
residential development shall have a minimum 60' right-of-way.
All ponding easements for this development shall be dedicated to
incorporate the maximum storage volume capacities necessary to
handle the highest intensity use of the surrounding undeveloped
property in accordance with the overall Master Plan.
In addition to the County Highway access permits, this development
shall acquire all regulatory agency permits necessary for the
utility extensions.
ASSESSMENTS: The underlying property incorporated by this
subdivision has been previously assessed for trunk area sanitary
sewer and trunk water main at the single-family rates.
There are several pending assessments for streets and utilities
associated with Daniel Drive under Project #475. However, when
Daniel Drive was installed under that project, it was in
anticipation of this property being developed on a commercial basis.
Subsequently, the pending assessments are greater than that which
would be required with the residential development similar to this
proposal. However, it is recommended that this development agree to
assume those additional assessments beyond the residential benefit
as a condition of the proposed downzoning.
This property has not yet paid its trunk area storm sewer
assessments and as a condition of final plat approval should accept
them as follows:
Item Quantity Rate Amount
Trunk Area Storm Sewer 2,012,472/sf $.053/sf $106,661
All final assessment rates shall be those in effect at the time of
final plat approval, based on final plat area calculations.
/&V
CONDITIONS: LEXINGTON POINTE 2ND ADDITION
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. No side -yard variances with buildings less than 15' apart
shall be allowed.
3. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication Fee.
4. Downstream trunk storm sewer facilities shall be ordered for
installation by Council action prior to final plat approval.
5. An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted and
approved prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat
approval.
6. In addition to all common lot line drainage and utility
easements, appropriate utility and ponding easements must be
dedicated based on final design alignment and elevations.
7. This development shall be responsible for constructing a 12"
trunk water main within Lexington Pointe Parkway to provide
service to the adjacent commercial property.
8. This development shall be responsible for providing a sanitary
sewer stub to the adjacent commercial property.
9. Major and minor access locations onto Diffley Road shall be in
accordance with Dakota County Highway Department
recommendations.
10. Daniel Drive and Lexington Pointe Parkway shall be dedicated
with an 80' wide rights-of-way. All remaining interior
residential streets shall be a minimum 60' wide right-of-way.
11. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of
all regulatory agency and County permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
12. This development shall assume its assessment responsibilities
associated with trunk area storm sewer.
13. An 8' wide bituminous trailway shall be constructed along the
west side of Daniel Drive as the responsibility of this
development.
14. This development shall be responsible for a parks dedication
fee.
15. The westerly extension of Daniel Drive and its intersection
with the north -south major and minor connection to Diffley
Road shall have a "T" configuration.
16. A detail storm sewer system shall be submitted and approved by
staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat
approval.
l��
D
a
0
z
0
U
ujte%
V.1
0
i -
z
x
w
S
O
�
+ '
J �
a
j ,
• • � a �
III
.'r-' !•.-..J... 1.
CL
I,!I.i
W
O
�3
O
�
W
.'r-' !•.-..J... 1.
CL
It
w z
z
O
0
Z Q
O
~ O
c7 z
Z
O
X U
W Ld W
i J in
W
j
CL
0
7-f 1
ix
< z
14
4 z
LU X
m LLJ
�o
333 2;
JI I
- r
Z z
•ti
I
l
jLl,
Ll
LI. t:
0
UN
His
1J.H
0
UN
moi. ,s, � �
QI
I
>
PIN
CL - cr
cc
�' �,.•� / x.03, (c Z 0 6 1 r
�S :• ' �' ' f�_ 1 �` � 1_...t; /��\�\�.`�,lt 1i1 t� � U' 11�, t
I \'..`, i%•w \�r. '\\'�''' -;;y_' �.'•Ilw�11111 l/ a ii
•« /�'� fes. - \�c ori;\ Y�;� �`� I•rt ;A�•.h'�(•,i''=-- a !
III • � ,. � ' � - i �'\`��.�v�t�_ , 11 • _-� CC^... �'�; !!lIl.,{C�,'� _ r' �„��`- __ �,�, y
IL
C ii a f : . « I /' ; c xrvz �' tom. _ � 6. 4� . � ' 4 + 1`� I' _ -- "� 'I t• ,. ;s i t 11 � j ,
1Gii7� !• 'r=t=. �� w r��.-'�� +;/—'t' ,! r;•• '`•5�1��,'`. --• 3 f�:
r t ��` I. :tom i� cs. -- �� '• �
H a'{ i � I � �(.F, �_�\ �r r� ` 1 I �•�' .L� _,,.�� �} ti t Iti•i'i'i'i 'I 3 ! ,
J ¢ `� �_1"ti`s`,' 1 F .t '• _ �7 �1, `� i,'�//// ••—� ' ,,. I r :I! !!a.r :� :I�!;- 'I 3 ! t
Z `\ ;%j, .1-':� - .�` �. .I .�. :1• _i�l � ��.•� -r,�� ..._.�7 .I- r: �`.�J '�i 1 �:1 o;3j;�iir'e •'!''!E ;�3: �;
7 11 71� i� ,/•.. ���z—.--_L--13— J� a .1 � fl -� •err __ �-..I :r-' =t . �' i. :t: ::!
u /1 )�I 11� `/. �(I -�. "•j _l '�f�,i r••( ,/�/�'//.=�j;.-I._ -.�ir '�I'i 11� h, � u s i'! :i.' - 9ti=n' '!
'1 u' .� ,�. ,I /• I I• -s J' - ��~i /; /// �t" I '� is !: -i! :7: i :i i-
s_;i � /'���L'� \\! ` yi r ': I � c• ��cr!^'1T'��' -�• � rri• .�1 � �1 -_ii-i:_ __ �t �i
I -moi:./,] I 1 Y.-- ./ - ":��.�1..�.=:•: - �n�� Iii - '� - ii� 3!
}v •!7.-;:��l�i,. w=abtl+l�>t3 SiiiV U41 w•.. "'- - -- --- - - = --. _ ./• �`;.- _'•���' 'c�':Sie.: _c::
!_.
�✓yyj7 / _ p[ t:: ti is;:li ii= !!.l:::::'33!i
!ti
I ! 1 � � � : / �/ i 1 't �,� �I I 4 :. ili1��°.i.! E!! i;ItE•: t. `fi
is
iii•;iiii:?! 5=! t!11iihiEi: ii:
i. •;'.. _ 'ilii
' % -- ! "'� N � 1 Nil-�'� iry;_ - _ =:�fi�i'i':°�cii;? .`1•Ec3 �:'I";•:?3
i it
'�'� I` ! s'E;!i•:!a.ii;l: l� :.............
�._ 1 i •.��� J O ` 'I � r�l a.ii...:!i:1
I s1!I
ti t•J , ', I / —` : _';::; :::: i!!cai l; iili!ie:: i:; ii:::3:
1 3
i.. ..i --'
------------- -
II
((R
bNp.
Win
.
tip F ,
�r-.'
CJ-,'
. . . . . . . ju
NO
if i;'1! i'l
UA
Rot
OKI
0P1 -A'
cf
---•
-- - ------ T --------------- ---
I
holy!
Tim"! pq.-
Wo
rL
Z
Z 0
3,C
0" ,
ll
!fill
•LLJ
z 4
CL
bNp.
Win
.
tip F ,
�r-.'
CJ-,'
. . . . . . . ju
NO
if i;'1! i'l
UA
Rot
OKI
0P1 -A'
cf
---•
-- - ------ T --------------- ---
I
holy!
Tim"! pq.-
MIN
soualrE JP -20
C�F~�' 855 6 J-o�A J
— — J 523 L.S.-17
J -w
815.3— 840.0 �(a0
i
I L
dd �2• JP -3'4 ��,�J-s J -r
884.6 JP -4' 0 JP -2
0.
880.4 \ 8401
\ JP -29
926.0
945.0 W' P -27i —T
R 9 ki3O '
o; DIFFLEY ROAD 0
51
o
—
r� I •.� I ' w��a N 1 I i
0. 6. 0 x i
:NSINC... ;N H
PLACE V,1st�O '{'
;
G
Qc
JP- 23 '�' Z
652.2
857.4
JP -2
843.
"A
JP -25 �l
817.0 sl
824.0CC/
�x CY
L.S.-18
JP -26 --%
1806.0-
24-0. s
/�, :� H 4k �O 9•
-y J-oa 1,`
AUOI70R'S SU N N0. aF /
E 0 •----- -- JP -52 i
y� JP -68 862.0
0
878.0 /
J -bb
:nLJIDPARK
LP 471 u 3Q $
908.Oi 908.3
9/0.661 9I /6.0
9
J
I_ _.-1—
t
iF
z '.00i
LP- 27 '
922.0
925.4 r I
SUBJECT PARCEL
LEXINGTON POINTE ADD.
approved: standard
plate 4:
city of eagan
PUBLIC STORM SEWER
m
DEORKSPARTMENTio MASTER PLAN
I
N. E. 1/4 S E C. 2 6, T 2 79 R 2 3 ac.—. -.K .........
SEV4 SEP 23, T ZT R23
couNry STATE
HIGH.Al
Z,
A
I E
N "TH
Yo.
hl - ?,
ids W'. Y
/Y ".x
A N&
iCNING`f
LEXINGTON POINTE 1st ADD
� p/
•4"
......... ..
7
...............
..r.. ..1...:::'-::
... .......
Z:;�� .................
.... .....
............
t
...... ... ....
.. ........
... . . ....
...........
..........
. ..
..............
.... ............
.... N,
....... LEXINGTON POINTE 2nd ADD. SCHWANZ
..............
.... .......
012-05
LAKE
........ ... . ..
.................. ........
%
CADV
............ ...... ..........
SFIF'4
............
...........
STORM SEWER TRUNK AREA 46.2 Ac.
............
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: MAY 11, 1987
RE: LEXINGTON POINT 2ND ADDITION
At the Advisory Commission meeting on Thursday, May 7, the Advisory Commission
reviewed the Lexington Point 2nd Addition for trails requirements. Mr. Brad
Swenson, developer of this project, was present at the Commission meeting to
discuss with the members this particular residential development. Lexington
Point is a part of the Lexington South PUD and all parkland dedication has
been completed. However, trails remain an issue for the Commission's
recommendations. After significant review and discussion by the Advisory
Commission, the Commission made the following recommendations to the City
Council which the developer was in agreement with:
1) that the developer provide a ten -foot trailway in the south portion of
this plat connecting to the Highline Trail, location to be determined by
staff and the developer, generally located between Lots 16 and 26, Block
3;
2) that a trail be located in the 50 -foot NSP easement south of Lexington
Point Parkway;
3) that a sidewalk be extended along Lexington Point Parkway extending from
Daniel Drive to the 50 -foot NSP easement;
4) that an 8' bituminous trailway or concrete sidewalk of 5 feet in width be
extended along Daniel Drive from Diffley Road to Lexington Point Parkway;
5) that the triangular portion of the property located in the southeast
corner be dedicated to the City for parks purposes;
6) that, in an effort to save a significant number of oaks and vegetation,
the developer be granted a variance to the 30 -foot setback requirement
for lots in the southeast corner extending from approximately Lots 39
through 31. This variance to the setback requirement of approximately 10
feet should have the impact of saving a significant number of trees.
It is also understood that the City will provide a trailway along the current
road right of way extending south of Lexington Point Parkway to Trapp Farm
Park.
Jq5
TOM HEDGES
MAY 11, 1987
PAGE TWO
The Commission is also aware of the City's discussion regarding road width and
alignment for both the Lexington Point Parkway and the southeast residential
road. The Commission would like to draw the Council's attention to the
roadway width issue requesting that the narrowest road or 50' right of way be
req uied to allow for an adjustment of these lots in order to move the lots
and h es, forward to save the trees.
DirectbF of Parks & Recreation
KV/mc
cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works
Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide
Brad Swenson, Tri -Land, Inc.
J�q
t
APC Minutes
April 30, 1987
Hall moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of
the conditional use permit for on -sale 3.2 beer and wine. In
addition, but separate from the previous approval, it is recommended
that the conditional use permit, if allowed under the existing City
Code and approved by the City Council after the appropriate
applications for on -sale liquor, be approved. All voted in favor.
Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That staff verify that proper notice was provided for the
public hearing before the Planning Commission in regard to this
matter.
2. All Sign Ordinance requirements shall be adhered to.
All voted yes.
LEXINGTON POINTE 2ND ADDITION - PD AMENDMENT
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND
PRELIMINARY PLAT
The third public hearing of the evening was in regard to the
second item' on the- agenda and convened by Chairman Hall. The
request of Tri -Land Properties included an amendment to the
Lexington South Planned Development, a rezoning of 57.6 acres from
CSC (Community Shopping Center) within the Lexington South PD to
R-1 PD (Single Family district), Comprehensive Guide Amendment and a
preliminary plat consisting of 169 lots located on the northeast
quarter of Section 26, south of Diffley Road and east of Lexington
Avenue. Mr. Runkle introduced the application, noting that the
rezoning for this parcel had been requested upon the application for
the 1st Addition in order to facilitate the design and sizing of
utilities for that addition. Mr. Brad Swenson was present to answer
questions on behalf of the developer and no one from the public was
present to address this issue.
After discussion in regard to condition 15 of the staff report,
the developer indicated that he could comply with the suggestions.
The developer indicated the intent to develop the land west of the
proposal and east of Lexington Avenue as approximately 50 acres of
commercial and 37 acres of apartments. Mr. Colbert indicated that
at this time, the only issue was sanitary sewer sizing, which should
be based upon the highest use. In response to member Gustafson's
questions, the developer indicated that 60% of the lots were
undersized and under the 85 foot width. Mr. Swenson expressed
concern in regard to the 80 foot right-of-way being requested for
Lexington Pointe Parkway. Mr. Colbert indicated that indeed a 70
foot right-of-way would be sufficient if the Advisory Parks
Commission and City Council determined that a trailway was not
APC Minutes
April 30, 1987
necessary ``along -Lexington Pointe Parkway. Mr. Colbert also
indicated Ih -response to member Wilkins' questions, that the 44 foot
wide face-to-face street would be provided in either of the right-
of-way situations, providing for an 8 foot safety lane for residents
that would need to back onto the street from their homes.
Trygg moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the Comprehensive Guide Amendment. All voted yes.
Trygg moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend rezoning
and an amendment to the Planned Development from CSC (Commercial
Shopping Center) to R-1 PD. All voted yea.
Trygg moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. No side -yard variances with buildings less than 15 feet
apart shall be allowed.
3. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee.
4. Downstream trunk storm sewer facilities shall be ordered for
installation by Council action prior to final plat approval.
5. An erosion and sediment control plan shall -be submitted and
approved prior -to issuance of a grading permit or final plat
approval.
6. In addition to all common lot line drainage and utility
easements, appropriate utility and ponding easements must be
dedicated based upon final design alignment and elevations.
7. This development shall be responsible for constructing a 12
inch trunk water main within Lexington Pointe Parkway to provide
service to the adjacent commercial property.
8. This development shall be responsible for providing a
sanitary sewer stub to the adjacent commercial property.
9. Major and minor access, locations onto Diffley Road shall be
in accordance with Dakota County Highway Department recommendations.
10. Daniel Drive and Lexington Pointe Parkway shall be
dedicated with 80 foot wide rights-of-way if trailway is determined
to be necessary. All remaining interior residential streets shall
be a minimum 60 foot wide right-of-way.
11. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency and County permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
APC Minutes
April 30, 1987
12. This development shall assume its assessment
responsibilities associated with trunk area storm sewer.
13. An 8 foot wide bituminous trailway shall be constructed
along the west side of Daniel Drive or located as determined by the
Parks Commission, as the responsibility of this development.
14. The westerly extension of Daniel Drive and its intersection
with the north -south major and minor connection to Diffley Road
shall have a "T" configuration.
15. A detailed storm sewer system shall be 'submitted and
approved by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or final
plat approval.
All members voted affirmatively.
EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
The fourth public hearing of the evening was then called by
Chairman Hall in regard to the applications of Partnership Royale
for rezoning of approximately 46.848 acres from A (Agricultural) to
R-1 (Single Family) and a preliminary plat consisting of 65 lots and
one outlot located in the southeast quarter of Section 31, abutting
Safari Pass on the- east and Cedar Avenue on the west, with a
variance for a cul-de-sac in excess of subdivision standards. City
Planner Runkle described the location, topography and lot
configurations for 73 single family lots. Mr. Marvin Eggum, one of
the partners, was present to introduce the proposal, in addition to
Mr. Mike Halley and Mr. Loren Spande, who ind-icated that their homes
would range in value from $220,000.00 to $600,000.00. Mr. Ralph
Wagner, engineer for the partnership, was also present to describe
the large lots which anticipate 100 foot widths at the setback line.
Mr. Wagner also indicated that some platting would have to be
delayed to interface with the Watschke property to the north. There
was no one from the public to address the issue. In regard to Mr.
Gustafson's question, the developer and Mr. Foertsch indicated that
the looping of.water lines could be resolved between City staff and
the applicant. Staff also indicated that the cul-de-sac and tear-
drop cul-de-sac issue had been resolved in addition to grading.
In response to questions regarding estate zoning, Mr. Spande
indicated that the architectural controls and requirements for
overall value of homesites would create an estate type development.
In response to member Wilkins' question in regard to the variance
for cul-de-sac, Mr. Colbert indicated that indeed it was necessary
due to the topography. In response to Chairman Hall's question, Mr.
Foertsch indicated that changes received by the staff in the last
two days from the developer, were responsive to staff's concerns
expressed in the report. He also indicated that staff could review
the matter prior to the City Council meeting if detailed plans were
f+ M
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Seven
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ULTRA IV ADDITION
D. Ultra IV Addition for a Preliminary Plat to Include a
Restaurant/Bar with Athletic Fields in an R-1 District and a
Conditional Use Permit to Allow On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Beer Sales --A
public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their
last regular meeting held on April 30, 1987, to consider a
preliminary plat entitled Ultra IV Addition consisting of one lot
and a conditional use permit to allow on -sale wine and 3.2 beer
sales and pylon sign. The application also consisted of a
conditional use permit for recreational facilities in an L-1
district. The APC is recommending approval of the preliminary plat
and all three (3) conditional use permits as presented.
For a copy of the staff reports on the preliminary plat and
conditional use perm,*,t pertaining to Ultra IV Addition, refer to
pages 1-) _1_ through dL.
For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page(s)
Also enclosed on page00c_2-is a copy of the APRC recommendation that
this plat be subject to a commercial/industrial parks dedication
cash requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat for a restaurant/bar referred to as Ultra IV
Addition and conditional use permits for on -sale wine and 3.2 beer
sales, pylon sign and allowing a restaurant use in an LI district.
/7 F
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
ULTRA IV ADDITION
APPLICANT: ULTRA IV, INC.-
LOCATION:
NC_LOCATION: W1/2 SECTION 17
EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 30, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 15, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Ultra IV, Inc.
requesting a Preliminary Plat of approximately 12 LI acres for a
restaurant/ bar and athletic facility. This site, Tract F of Reg-
istered Land Survey #4 will contain 10.3 acres for the restaurant
and a 1.9 acre outlot. City Code permits Class I (sitdown) rest-
aurants in LI districts and indoor commercial recreation facilities
such as bowling alleys and tennis clubs. Outdoor facilities are
not specifically addressed.
On sale wine and 3.2 beer sales are listed as Conditional Use items.
A seperate liquor license will be required. The Conditional Use
Permit requested now is for a pylon sign.
The site,located on the west side of HWY 13 is surrounded by LaHass
Corporation across Blackhawk Road to the east, office type use and
undeveloped property to the north/west an existing single family
residence on the corner of Shawnee Road and HWY 13.
SITE PLAN/BUILDING CONCEPT: This 250 seat restaurant requires 83-
10' wide parking stalls. 308 have been provided in order to accom-
odate the needs of approximately 12 softball teams that may use this
facility for tournament play. The two story building contains two
volleyball courts on the lower level along with the bar/eating area
and dance floor.
The volleyball area is open to the second floor and visible from
that eating area through a glass wall. A large deck on the western
sides of the building over looks the two fenced softball fields.
These fields are designed for Class A teams - the highest level of
amateur play. The distance from home plate to the fence is 300'.
Ample warmup area has been provided between the fields. There has
been a concern by staff of balls being hit into lots with different
ownership.
The exterior of the building is playfull and very -appropriate for
its use. A prefinished metal canopy/roof design along with
pennants will add a festive color to the stucco on block main struc-
ture ture. All setbacks meet*Code requirements.
/77
Page 2
The preliminary landscape plan is well done and meets the performance
standards listed in the landscape policy. Screening the large park-
ing area was the main concern and the mixture of plant material,
sizes and species will also create year round interests.
The proposed pylon sign along HWY 13 at the Blackhawk intersection
has not been designed yet but the location, 125 sq. ft. per side 27'
height proposed meet the requirements of the Sign Ordinance.
GRADING/ DRAINAGE: This proposed development is located on a site
that generally slopes from the intersection of T.H. 13 and Blackhawk
Road to the east with a total elevation differential of
approximately 42'. Subsequently, the prleliminary grading plan
submitted proposes a two-tier development with the upper level
consisting of the parking lot and main floor facility with the lower
level incorporating two recreational softball fields.
This site has had a considerable amount of construction demolition
and sludge ash fill deposited from the Seneca Waste Water Treatment
Plant operations to achieve its current elevations. The attached
Soil and Water Conservation District report discusses this impact in
greater detail. The MPCA is currently monitoring the ground water
to determine the extend of potential contamination associated with
this fill material.
The proposed 3% slope of the recreational softball fields does not
meet the 1 & 1/2 - 2s slopes required by the City recreation
standards. In addition, a 20' flat area should be provided outside
of the foul lines adjacent to the parking lot side slope which is
not reflected in the submitted grading plan. It is also strongly
recommended that intercepting drainage swales be constructed
adjacent to each ballfield's foul line to intercept and prevent
drainage from the parking lot side slopes from crossing the playing
surface.
The grading required for the proposed parking lot construction
adjacent to T.H. 13 removes the minimum fill required over the
existing 16" trunk water main. Either a revised grading plan will
have to be submitted or this existing trunk water main will have to
be lowered in place to conform to the new grades.
The existing ditch along the east property line should be shaped to
its final configuration and properly established with permanent
vegetation to conform to the overall site development.
There is an existing 42" trunk storm sewer facility which parallels
Blackhawk Road traversing this site along the western edge of the
parking lot facility. An intercepting catch basin manhole should be
constructed between the two ballfields to provide better drainage
for the previously referenced drainage swales.
Existing drainage swales will either have to be provided for or,
properly relocated to ensure continuation of upstream drainage
areas.
Page 3
The internal parking lot storm sewer system is adequate to handle
the drainage from the proposed parking lot facility. However, a
storm sewer line with a capacity of 17 cfs must be extended to
Blackhawk Road to provide for future extension to the east to handle
the drainage from the LaHass property in conformance with the
Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan.
In light of these considerations, the revised detail site grading
plan should be prepared and resubmitted. In order to address these
cncerns, it may be necessary to construct significant retaining
walls or reduce/relocate the restaurant facility and its related
parking stall configuration.
Adjustment to the existing trunk storm sewer facilities will have to
be provided for in the final grading plan to maintain access to
manholes.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient capacity and
depth is immediately available along T.H. 13 and within Blackhawk
Road to provide adequate service to this proposed development. .
As previously mentioned, it is anticipated that a section of the 16"
trunk water main adjacent to T.H. 13 may have to be relocated due to
the proposed change in grades.
The internal placement of appropriate fire hydrants for fire
protection will be addressed as a part of the building permit
application process.
STREETS/CIRCULATION: This site is adequately serviced by existing
T.H. 13 and Blackhawk Road, both of which are currently upgraded to
its ultimate design standards and capable of handling the traffic
generated from this development.
However, with this and other additional developments in the overall
industrial park, it is anticipated that increased traffic demands
will ultimately require the installation of a traffic control signal
on T.H. 13 at Blackhawk Road.
The internal parking lot configuration and circulation appears to
conform to City Ordinances and standards. However, the northerly
most access on Blackhawk Road does not appear to line up opposite
the existing access to the LaHass Corporation facility on the
opposite side. Therefore, a revised parking lot layout will have to
be submitted and reviewed to ensure internal circulation
compatability.
The parking stalls located on the north side of the northerly most
entrance are located in an area that will be very susceptible to
foul balls. The parking stall ratio requirements should be reviewed
to see if these stalls can be eliminated. If not, they should be
relocated to provide an adequate separation from the ballfields.
The southerly entrance closest to T.H. 13 provides adequate spacing
and stacking and will not create a capacity problem.
/9l
Page 4
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Any grading or excavation work
performed within T.H. 13 will require the appropriate permit from
MnDOT.
Correspondence from the MPCA should be received in regards to the
acceptability of the existing fill material in relationship to the
proposed development and existing ground water system.
There does not appear to be any other utility, grading or street
construction located outside the boundary of this development
requiring additional permanent or temporary construction easements.
ASSESSMENTS:
The property proposed for development under the Ultra IV Addition
application has been previously assessed for trunk area sanitary
sewer, water and storm sewer facilities at the proper rates.
However, Blackhawk Road improvements installed under Project 110B
inadvertently ommitted 150' of frontage.
The assessments for the recent extension of Blackhawk Road with
related storm sewer facilities was withdrawn from the final
assessment roll based on objections submitted from the property
owner at the hearing held on September 16, 1986. Subsequently, any
development on this property should accept these outstanding special
assessments.
This property has not been previously assessed for its lateral
benefit from the trunk sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewr
facilities adjacent to this development. This responsibility should
be a condition of plat approval based on the rates in effect at the
time of that approval. These are all identified as follows:
Item Quantity Rate Amount Project
Blackhawk Rd. Streets 150'(1) $92.76/ff $13,914.00 110B
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Water Main 719.36' 20.55/ff 14,783.00 15
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Sanitary Sewer' 244.87' 15.06/ff 3,688.00 4
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Storm Sewer 740' 10.39/ff 7,689.00 279 & 428
Blackhawk Rd. Streets 225' 59.27/ff 13,335.10 428(2)
Blackhawk Rd. Storm
Sewer 225' 9.94/ff 2,236.83 428(2)
(1)Unassessed frontage for Blackhawk Road, Project 110B.
(2)Figure should be adjusted for interest incurred since September'
16, 1986, (final assessment hearing).
All quantities and rates will be in accordance with the final plat
documents and application year.
CONDITIONS: ULTRA IV ADDITION
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. The detailed landscape plan will be required with the final plat
and the financial guarentee shall not be released until one year
after the date of installation.
3. A parking lot lighting plan shall be submitted with the final plat.
No direct lighting source shall be visible from HWY 13.
4. All Sign Ordinances shall be adhered to.
5. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication Fee.
6. No tailgating parties will be allowed.
7. The northerly most driveway access must line up opposite the
exiting main entrance to LaHass Corporation on the east side.
8. A revised grading and drainage plan must be submitted to
provide the installation of softball fields compatible to City
of Eagan recreational standards and other standard engineering
concerns.
9. The adjustment to the existing trunk storm sewer and trunk
water main facilities shall be the full responsibility of this
development.
10. This development shall provide a 17 cfs capacity storm sewer
extension to Blackhawk Road for future extension to the east to
handle upstream drainage.
11. The northerly most portion of the parking lot should be reduced
or relocated to minimize the impact of foul balls from the
softball complex.
12- All regulatory agency permits and/or comments shall be obtained
prior to final plat approval.
13. This development shall accept its full financial responsibility
for additional assessment obligations associated with the
development of this property.
14. This development shall provide adequate drainage easements for
any existing or proposed utility system or drainage swales
providing service to other private/public properties.
/ �3
DAKOTA COUNTY SOMI AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
MINNESOTA
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
April 7, 1987
TO: ;Mike Foer tsch
City of Eagan
FROM: Lynn M. Chakoian
Dakota County S4:CD
PE: Ultra IV Preliminary Plat
3ACKCIZOUND:
Farmington Professional Building
821 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Phone: (612) 463.8626
A preliminary_ polat oronosal for Ultra IV was submitted for
erosion and sediment control review. Plans include a site
plan, landscape plan, utility and grading clan. A
Preliminary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has riot been
submitted.
SOIL AND 6'ATER PFSOURC'E,S:
The site area was nreviously used for sludge ash fill. The
suitability of this soil material for the Ultra IV
application needs investigation. The ;Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency should provide input with regard to the
potential for groudwater contamination from this material
being buried on a longterm basis.
No wetlands, water bodies or holding basins are located on
the subject Property. Channels leaving the site will carry
stormwater to the Minnesota River.
EPOSION AND SEDIMENT CONTPOL:
No Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been submitted.
The plan should follow the "Checklist" and "General
Criteria" provided by the City of Eagan. Some specific
information follows that may be useful in preparation of the
Ulan.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER.
O
al�CaSIOr1 CONTROL MEASURES
Within two days of completion of rough grading, the entire
site should be seeded and mulched to stabilize the disturbed
areas. This esaecially applies to the ball field area.
Once this is re -vegetated, sediment movement off site will
be greatly reduced. Seeding and mulching details, as
identified on the "Checklist", should be specified.
Structural measures needed for erosion control on this site
may include temoorary gravel construction entrances, silt
curtain along the north and west side of the develonment,
and storm sewer inlet filters. Detailed plans for these
structural practices should be provided.
The silt curtain shown on the grading and drainage plan is
not placed correctly. Relocate this silt fence to the other
side of the new channels. Phis will help reduce sediment
movement into the channels and downstream. Placing silt
fence across the channel would be ineffective because the
flows woulu become concentrated. After the silt fence is
properly installed, fill should be placed at the silt fence
first. This fill will create a berm that will greatly
contribute to the effectiveness of the silt fence in
stopping sediment movement into the channels.
EROSION CONTROL MANAGEMENT
All erosion and sediment measures should be in place before
grading and then regularly inspected and maintained as
needed. The individual responsible for this must be
.identified on the plan.
We recommend that a statement be placed on the development
plan indicating that the builders will be responsible for
erosion and sediment control during construction.
Schedules for installing utilities, revegetation of those
disturbed areas, building construction and blackt000ing are
required. These schedules impact what erosion control
measures will be necessary.
Disposition of erosion and sediment control measures needs
to be addressed. Include a contact person responsible for
final clean up of the site.
OTHER COMMENTS
Adeauate stabilization of the relocated
addressed, and of those downstream. No
information was provided in the grading
kgs
channels needs to be
downstream
and drainage Man.
CONCLUSIONS
We understand, that with any new program, it takes time to
educate those involved in developing, Erosion and Sediment
Control Plans. ;ve hope that Erosion and Sediment Control
Plans are submitted with future Preliminary Plats.
;,'e recommend that the Preliminary Plat be approved, but that
an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan be submitted and
approved before a grading permit is issued or final plat
approval.
cc: John Z. Marsh, Seenberg-z?enkel Co.
Heise, Vanny and Associates
Brad Swensen, Tri -Land Inc.
�V
Z � Bl
E
�i
` � n
s
> y A
tie
•4 O
{ ieeilci'i;c4
=iitcir:i3
Hebe ULTRA IV
mte, FGAN' MINNESUTA
ol.
1 Wse
Vanney IV(�%\ i FLOOR PLAN
p jz j'nl k.
Heise
!�_ ateS , ULTRA IV ELEVATIONS AND
_ - --
W AS.SOdr... SECTION —
__. w—es-aar�
Heise
soc'abes LLTRAp�\ �rAnare.
ORE.
...,.
0
-L.,
�-,
S~ -y. --
��w�-
��-. ai
-
i�•al•�.fi k.�11
�.. .,:
`1.'-_�`�-�
.'
0
' !I % r
II ■ fd t}'� M`
s o=
.L:{'.AC_
€i-9"rdv
.► - — - i X n pq �.a;,.r tom,. .
• � - ,1 f Gay �� � �� `F ���I�ti
Pitt `I
1 .� : fes-•. _ •7 � J_ `f ,1 �,., €���ppt�A��gRgRni��, �I•,
1
-A _
- '' l •. '! ... .f .: - , plyy tt1�iitt� �f�� jI
i - - - - --- -; m --t,--- --
cn
^r' • _ /Z>
q. t Z m
a
pt
1 •e�' `I �� 'I 11 %.
•t
I s
�• ll � ii � � � �fl:r1 I. 1 � � � t!'ll61
,I - ►J�1 � f I I. i;i ' . l ' 1. I � I Il 1 - �
.I 1 I- Ij!1t1i�111 �• �. I.�Ih6 a�!It'� I
•, � C1 .'7 •- •'Ti � q, �: � •id ,I L 5 � 'i� �' �: B '. y?y� w i i —
+I• ([ ! -_ + �.- I iii'_- i � +� --
>r e D' ULTRA N. :ME PLAN
Vanney F. Aseodates FAr W MNNi'SOTA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
...... a.0.•ra►.■1.0 f 02010.
n u ...14iD..
.. f.., 1O.f..OT. 11122 f1!/•.• -O V•
w,�
i
1
N
t a
I
[C
' I
'a
F
6 •
�
�
�
n
�"
,K
T1
R
'■�I
6
r
I
f
' !I % r
II ■ fd t}'� M`
s o=
.L:{'.AC_
€i-9"rdv
.► - — - i X n pq �.a;,.r tom,. .
• � - ,1 f Gay �� � �� `F ���I�ti
Pitt `I
1 .� : fes-•. _ •7 � J_ `f ,1 �,., €���ppt�A��gRgRni��, �I•,
1
-A _
- '' l •. '! ... .f .: - , plyy tt1�iitt� �f�� jI
i - - - - --- -; m --t,--- --
cn
^r' • _ /Z>
q. t Z m
a
pt
1 •e�' `I �� 'I 11 %.
•t
I s
�• ll � ii � � � �fl:r1 I. 1 � � � t!'ll61
,I - ►J�1 � f I I. i;i ' . l ' 1. I � I Il 1 - �
.I 1 I- Ij!1t1i�111 �• �. I.�Ih6 a�!It'� I
•, � C1 .'7 •- •'Ti � q, �: � •id ,I L 5 � 'i� �' �: B '. y?y� w i i —
+I• ([ ! -_ + �.- I iii'_- i � +� --
>r e D' ULTRA N. :ME PLAN
Vanney F. Aseodates FAr W MNNi'SOTA
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
...... a.0.•ra►.■1.0 f 02010.
n u ...14iD..
.. f.., 1O.f..OT. 11122 f1!/•.• -O V•
w,�
i
1
-- ;•+ . fit'; . . , .• - ' �,T r 1. 3 -�- I � - _-_-. _
1 j � ! ' '.lei• > .f .1 � p c
F
.t
---'__----------------_
F
rrreet"tUMS
tt�fti=c=!cF
c: •'i!'ii; 'ts
-csF
=Fei�'iireE�:
SF=r -
i
S"^WNCC ROAD ((60' ROMA . 44 25-8)
217 � �� •- y
/
�—/ � /
� Y. ,�\ �\\ VL �
��.—
r
rst •jf
cam.
a� _7L�_� = ••'mac\ �`� � �` y—��
�—J\ --�---
a V K oe' a
BLACK+"WH . ROAD (60' KO.W. ++' 9-0)
1 1 1
r
rst •jf
cam.
1 1 1
►y r, ; _ .. �:, ._ un"�1 A _ ............. LkiAd.a N
e„.
how.
67
N
MBNA`
,• LT i
25
- a. ` �p : iIA IRK r _
- Eagan -
-Int.erce fior 68
_ a
\ ; E}
i
,
. FOX L.
f
RIDGE I
I
48 T
V—
( 3 ✓C-- 1
,t 26 f�
Metropolitan_ Wasle
Control Commisslon 'I- ,� \� `t
Seneca �Piant j 2
r WT A ,
,.
54.: �T-E- . f ,C - E
US ' PA / §, / l
�
10
r
-
k
12 �•,,,TA
`
1211
-A/ - �.•, ADDITION , r :....,:_.,' 1
a W — B
72'1 0 r-' n -T
�.
�r t3L �K
BL (SR.C.
HILLS
W7 ve,
i \ 36
IR C
V,
iff
/ ^ ? GAN ME RD CENtER./Li_/�J�.. x,\\
a8rl
— -
SILLV �t !!{:: 2 _ ;
T i�
_ V...-•';/.--.-_� LAi�t�0 �.. �
ADD.'''�✓�,�G �
a rLACK
Y �`` / \:'� lli r• J;4a?.Scy�f�^ ; < PARK
d_GF � •� r
A .
SUBJECT PARCEL
- - -ULTRA IV FIG G. #-.2
City of eagan SANITARY approved. standard
SEWER
LFa\
PUBLIC plate #:
WORKS MASTER PLAN
Cm
DEPARTMEN
.... _.... .
CP
N:0, I 7 5. / -
j
769.4
y' � _� % .... � ..._.� --- :'air: I /Y /~ /� / ' \ ' • �\ .,l/
PIAL. CP
INDUST
790.7
806.
^ %GA P -2,.7
113 �. � *�� � • c✓' 796.3
r \lam` r l•Y;iCGt4i rt
1 . •'y - ' ; .._ �, y=- , ,—
G% b :
A- bb
�:- �'••.,,- \ •. ..-', ;:ENO 1rt-�---� - -
A—i j A D TI ON�
so
'w •A - k k / A- h AF - 3 8 ,-•- F C �ci c 8C
839.8
_
696,3 •i -.A= 84/.4
703.6'l
,ILVEii 7 %Z
A-9 ' ✓ } GAN MEII X816; 2T
t
A. \ _
►. /,i p. \ SILL I -..� (-A-PF36^rT1..._ = T
Q
1. aDD.� f�
I1 \\\tom-��� ) '�`�D� pf-...)`'�`i.
\ii� VILtL�E .
;.
1 /, �� i /\
J11 �r \,,'J� .'r1Cl:F�i`tiY /A\;� �/� \� r�. \.�54 l.' A k, ?��-{� ._, ` s
7.
Q'PgI,HAV[ N 54"`rI r
Nlrr / ,�_��/ �,;r:•'/ ./�\ _797 )3.RiC �.�
rr j
,856:6
G} cP .�� �; �/ �i•�.`1 ..1•y—ri i ,34T l jM L1.
1 I ��; A x'72 A�11' 36 r —, f'27.
6 �,.... r_....r ._r..�,� T.f.,T"A—
.AP-
r- 1`1
795.5 1y •� a _ C ,R�n
A
804.2 a y a' t
`\Y I' 5 EpA,
ED
f
it "`` � �_ �. 1 r � �'1`'`... }`r ! I � r. -� .-.-`•��_[ �._L�� `.
I
I h
�.Pr Et lirll�a -{E aI.NE �N I ANDAC
LIAN-C.GG h 72 ] t K A'
?AAkP_
LLL/.
6FENA-w PARK
J11 I ML
� AP 35
' 852:3-' Ef?f3riE 2 /
`•• `� 880:6 ..._
� r SCnOGL{-� T- .-._..
ITT . _ _ i 886.0
................
................
SUBJECT PARCEL
ULTRA IV-
F I G.
V-
FIG. #1
city of eagSTORM SEWER approved: standard
PUBLIC STORM :
�- -
- WORKS MASTER PLAN
°°
CPARTMENT l
Np IA` I RK '
h
Ix
"..j.a
FOX
I.
4A RIDGE
4,07 A 63.9
O.. --
%' I A �5�,. •; 0� 12r 79 , I 6r 20r
�8
..82
L• 60.T/..-.
887/
.,
61.0 95a g0 8 106.0 7TREA AIENT,:
68.8/84.0 PL NT
SITE
Y4p h�
1 91 *.1/92.0 CDG
--` 14,5 '/ _. ti • , 7.' 71;4/8 .0
a .0 5s�' .ir • 83 °
950 30
�c a -46�'� INOU IAL .� AFl. _�, a \t. 92 69.5/8 l0 / l�
75%71.0 - 'y '^': t 1•Lr - 93 60.4/78.0 p 18r All
. /
` f 0
69.9/70.0 a �T - -
` •u. 1 [ I 84.7
.0/65.0 (I T KENOF,. -�
8 567 T S' 8L ..0 i'
�.
ADlY6T(ANt la
95 94 JUMP 9
' / I ;86 73.3/74.0 1950 9CKH YK_.,,.
78 MIL'
SILL 96 9 -
/ 75'`3%76. TLi3�/71.0 /rao 1 7T ? 64.3/84.0 e
_ 'tao 'y
_ 135 q � 13'¢ , 133` C % I '4�
_ 1 i
1 SILL J sl 660 `131 Ari S5 56.2/770 --
` BLACKHAWK
PARK
WOODHAVEN
PARIS 7"- �
rE 136 ,69.6;(611.0 -lt�f -i -1�8'
` I 517/ 67.0 /
�� 1a;✓ I _ y. 18•. 123
•::_-y-:� �l � !•
r '
ULTRA IV
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG. *3
city of eagan WATER standard ate rd
0PUB#:
LIC
$ WORKS MASTER PLAN
co
N DEPARTMEN
n
�A A
J�PF' �,r
1'd'�
— ------ B — + t-------------------� ----
(a -Q �r
BLACKHAWK RD. i c
1 TI \Y'1'Y'7 •
ji
SI
Ir
po
-------�-- �— M .4►l�.r/N ,,i0'IL711_.,'. _`^/ / I IY�i�{9:y�1�!!Y
— (oa-� —MnaJ —o►) avoa 33NMVM9 —
77ee
I
I
• • • • 0 9.0 SANITARY SEWER LATERAL BENEFIT 244.87'
• WATERMAIN LATERAL BENEFIT 719.36'
* * * * * * * STORM SEWER LATERAL BENEFIT 740.0'
0 Im m m STREETS 150.0'
APC Minutes
April 30, 1987
ULTRA IV ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
At the request of a representative of the developer of Lexington
Point 2nd Addition, this item was continued further into the meeting
and the second hearing of the evening was in regard to the
applications of Ultra IV, Inc. for preliminary plat and conditional
use permit for a restaurant/bar with athletic field in a Light
Industrial district located on Tract F, RLS Lot #4, west of Highway
#13 between Blackhawk and Shawnee Roads in the west half of Section
17. It was noted by Mr. Runkle that City Code permits Class I
(sitdown) restaurant in Light. Industrial districts and indoor
commercial recreational facility such as bowling alleys and tennis
clubs: Outdoor athletic facilities are not addressed in the
ordinance. He also noted that on -sale wine and 3.2 beer sales are
listed as conditional uses within Light Industrial districts and
that the applicant had indicated a desire for a liquor license.
Finally, a conditional use permit was being requested for a pylon
sign.
Mr. Tom Reinen of Heise, Vanney & Associates, 123 No. 3rd
Street, #108, Minneapolis, MN was present on behalf of the applicant
and reviewed the plan, layout and proposed building construction.
There was no one present from the public to address this issue.
In response to questions in regard to locker room facilities,
attorney John Berglund indicated that none would be provided. Mr.
Berglund also indicated that the parking stall numbers could be
reduced to prevent potential damage to automobiles from foul balls.
Mr. Berglund further indicated that spectator seating would be
provided between the softball diamonds in addition to spectator
viewing from the decks of the building.
..Mr. Colbert indicated that erosion and sediment control would be
a standard condition of the plat. In response to member Trygg's
comments regarding alignment of the access drives, Mr. Colbert
indicated that this could be resolved with the developer.
In response to Mr. " Gustafson's questions, the developer
indicated that plans to resolve the issues expressed by staff could
be submitted to staff by Tuesday, May 5, 1987 if the proposal was
recommended for approval to the City Council.
Wilkins moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following
conditions:
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. The detailed landscape plan will be required with the final
plat and the financial guarantee shall not be released until one
year after the date of installation.
,i
AVC- Mii►utes
April 30, 1987
3... A parking lot lighting plan shall be submitted with the
final`plat.`- No direct lighting source shall be visible from Highway
#13.
A. ll, -Sign Ordinances shall be adhered to:
-- ,
-5.- -This plat shall be subject-toa parks dedication fee.
6. No tailgating parties shall be allowed.
7. The northerly most driveway access must line up opposite the
exiting main entrance to LaHass Corporation on the east side.
B. A revised grading and
provide the installation of
Eagan recreational standards
concerns.
9. The adjustment to the
water main facilities shall
development.
drainage plan must be submitted to
softball fields compatible to City of
and other standard engineering
existing trunk storm sewer and trunk
be the full responsibility of this
10. This development shall provide a 17 cfs capacity storm
sewer 'extension to-Blackhawk Road for future extension to the east
to handle upstream drainage.
11.. The northerly most portion of the parking lot should be
•educed" or -`relocated to'minimize-the impact of foul balls from the
softball complex.
12. All regulatory agency permits and/or comments shall be
obtained prior to final plat approval.
13. This development shall accept its full financial
responsibility for additional assessment obligations associated with
the development of this property.
14. This development shall provide adequate drainage easements
for any. -existing or proposed utility system or drainage swales
providing service to other private/public properties.
15. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is
conditioned upon the developer providing necessary plans and
information to the staff by May 6, 1987 to address staff concerns in
staff's report. Failure to comply with this condition shall result
in the plat being considered to have been continued by the Planning
Commission until its next regular meeting.
All voted yes.
Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit for softball fields. All voted aye.
IV aC�C)
APC Minutes
April 30, 1987
Hall moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of
the conditional use permit for on -sale 3.2 beer and wine. In
addition, but separate from the previous approval, it is recommended
that the conditional use permit, if allowed under the existing City
Code and approved by the City Council after the appropriate
applications for on -sale liquor, be approved. All voted in favor.
Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That staff verify that proper notice was provided for the
public hearing before the Planning Commission in regard to this
matter.
2. All Sign Ordinance requirements shall be adhered to.
All voted yes.
LEXINGTON POINTE 2ND ADDITION - PD AMENDMENT
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND
PRELIMINARY PLAT
The third public hearing of the evening was in regard to the
second item" on the- agenda and convened by Chairman Hall. The
request of Tri -Land Properties included an amendment to the
Lexington South Planned Development, a rezoning of 57.6 acres from
CSC (Community Shopping Center) within the Lexington South PD to
R-1 PD (Single Family district), Comprehensive Guide Amendment and a
preliminary plat consisting of 169 lots located on the northeast
quarter of Section 26, south of Diffley Road and east of Lexington
Avenue. Mr. Runkle introduced the application, noting that the
rezoning for this parcel had been requested upon the application for
the lstAddition in order to facilitate the design and sizing of
utilities for that addition. Mr. Brad Swenson was present to answer
questions on behalf of the developer and no one from the public was
present to address this issue.
After discussion in regard to condition 15 of the staff report,
the developer indicated that he could comply with the suggestions.
The developer indicated the intent to develop the land west of the
proposal and east of Lexington Avenue as approximately 50 acres of
commercial and 37 acres of apartments. Mr. Colbert indicated that
at this time, the only issue was sanitary sewer sizing, which should
be based upon the highest use. In response to member Gustafson's
questions, the developer indicated that 60% of the lots were
undersized and under the 85 foot width. Mr. Swenson expressed
concern in regard to the 80 foot right-of-way being requested for
Lexington Pointe Parkway. Mr. Colbert indicated that indeed a 70
foot right-of-way would be sufficient if the Advisory Parks
Commission and City Council determined that a trailway was not
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: MAY 11, 1987
RE: ULTRA IV ADDITION
The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission has reviewed the proposed Ultra
IV Addition at its May 7, 1987 Advisory Commission meeting. The Commission is
aware that this commercial development proposes softball facilities and indoor
volleyball courts associated with a restaurant. Based on the conversations
that staff has had with the developer, this is a commercial enterprise
operation that the Commission felt would provide little or no benefit to the
reduction of recreational needs within the community. Therefore, the
Commission has recommended to the City Council that this plat be subject to a
commWc:�al/industrial parks dedication cash requirement.
Director'of Parks & Recreation
KV/mc
cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig
Steve Hanson, Construction Analyst
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Eight
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION
E. Eagan Royale Addition - Rezoning of Approximately 46.848 Acres
from A to R-1 and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 65 Lots and One
Outlot--A public hearing was held at the April 30, 1987 Advisory
Planning Commission meeting, to consider two (2) applications
submitted by the Partnership Royale for a rezoning from A to R-1 and
a preliminary plat consisting of 73 lots on approximately 47 acres
abutting Safari Pass. The APC is recommending approval of both
applications. There is also a variance request for cul-de-sacs in
excess of 500 feet which were approved by the APC.
For additional inforination on these applications, refer to the staff
report on pages through -Q,1-5.
For a c y of the APC action regarding this item, refer to page(s)
0i& -air
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
rezoning from A to R-1 and a preliminary plat entitled Eagan Royale
Addition as presented.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE
(EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION)
APPLICANT: PARTNERSHIP ROYALE
LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 31
EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURE)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 30, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 21, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATIONS: Two applications have
been submitted requesting a
rezoning from A
(agricultural) to
R-1 (single
family) and a
preliminary plat
consisting of 73 lots
on 47 acres
abutting Safari
Pass on the east
and Highway 35E on the
west. Apple
Valley and the
City's water tower
abut to the south and
undeveloped
agricultural to
the north.
ZONING AND LAND USE: This site is heavily wooded, full of hills and
water holding depressions suited extremely well for upper bracket
housing.
The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site and the land to
the north D -II (0-6 units/acre). The 73 lots give this plat an
overall density of 1.5 units/acre. The average lot size is between
17,000 - 25,000 S.F. The smallest is 15,000 S.F. and the largest is
95,000 S.F. that contains a pond along I -35E. All lots meet or
exceed R-1 lot standards. Two lots have direct access onto Safari
Pass. If approved as is, stove pipe shaped Lot 8 should be given
distinct setback requirements in order to not infringe on the
privacy of the adjacent lots. The house pad in the proposed
location works well. The 'front' setback should stay a minimum 70'
from the southern property line or match the setback of Lot 9 if
that home is built first. Sideyard setbacks of 15' would increase
the distance between the housing but not infringe on the flexibility
of that lot to be built on.
A variance will be required for the cul-de-sacs in excess of 500'
serving the westernmost lots and the ones along the road to the
water tower.
GRADING/DRAINAGE: The proposed site offers extremely rugged
topography, a mixture of mature trees, numerous ponds and low areas,
and elevation differentials in excess of 1001plus or minus. The
proposed grading has a major impact on the existing low areas within
the site. Two low areas are being filled to accomodate house pads.
The proposed partial filling of three remaining low areas greatly
reduces their ponding storage volumes. One of the ponding areas
which is greatly affected by the proposed filling is a designated
ponding area in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer plan. Detailed
analysis of the proposed site's ponding requirements must be
completed prior to issuance of a grading permit.
The developer has failed to resolve staff's concerns regarding the
significant impact on the extensive vegetation with this proposed
grading plan.
The proposed preliminary storm sewer design is inadequate to handle
the runoff generated by this development and does not provide
adequate draining for landlocked low areas created by the proposed
grading. The low area at the terminus of the proposed storm sewer
does not have an outlet.
The proposed street grades are within acceptable standards
considering the extreme elevation differentials throughout this
site. The developer has failed to address staff's concerns regarding
the proposed elimination of the access road to the resevoir site.
This may affect the feasibility of this cul-de-sac. The preliminary
plat fails to define the intent of the proposed street stub and cul-
de-sac street running along its northerly boundary.
An inadequate erosion and sediment control plan was submitted with
the preliminary plat. The erosion and sediment control plan should
be revised and submitted to the Dakota County SWCD staff for their
approval before a grading permit is issued or final plat approval is
granted.
UTILITIES: Water main of sufficient size presently exists along
Safari Pass and the entrance to the water tower site. The
development proposes various water main loops to ensure adequate
pressure throughout the development. The dead-end water mains in
the two westerly cul-de-sacs should be interconnected. The proposed
water main connection along Lots 6 - 8 and 11 - 12, Block 2 is not
recommended. Water service to Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 can be obtained
from the existing water main along Safari Pass. The development is
proposing to stub water main to the adjacent northerly property for
future service and would ultimately connect to the existing water
main in Safari Trail.
Trunk sanitary sewer installation is required prior to construction
of the necessary lateral sanitary sewer to serve the proposed
development. Sanitary sewer of sufficient size and depth exists .
along Safari Pass to serve Lots 8 - 14 inclusive, Block 2. The
proposed sanitary sewer along the common lot lines in the
southeasterly portion of the development will not be allowed. A
C)�
sanitary sewer lateral can be constructed along the water tower
access road to serve Lots 10 - 14 inclusive, Block 2 from the
existing sewer in Safari Pass. Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 should be
served from the existing sanitary sewer in Safari Pass.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this site is provided by
Safari Pass on the east and through the Briar Oaks of Apple Valley
2nd Addition on the south. The development is in compliance with
the City policy of maintaining interconnection of roadways between
neighboring communities. The proposed entrance/through roadway into
this site will have a minimum 60' right-of-way. The proposed 50'
right-of-way cul-de-sac streets are acceptable. The proposed
teardrop design cul-de-sac is not acceptable. An acceptable
circular design cul-de-sac with center islands is available from
staff. The proposed cul-de-sac shall have a minimum radius of 601.
The minimum roadway width on the proposed cul-de-sac streets shall
be 28' face -of -curb to face -of -curb. The proposed entrance/ through
roadway minimum width shall be 32' face -of -curb to face -of -curb.
EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development shall ensure that
all appropriate ponding easements and utility easements are
dedicated as such on the final plat. The ponding easements for this
development shall be dedicated to incorporate the maximum storage
volume capacities necessary to handle the runoff generated by the
proposed development.
The 50' half right-of-way that presently exists for Safari Pass
exceeds the minimum 30' half right-of-way required by the City for a
residential street. The City will vacate the westerly 20' of the
existing 50' half right-of-way adjacent to the proposed development
upon submission of the appropriate petition by the developer.
This development shall be responsible for all the necessary permits
required by MnDot to construct utility improvements within the I -35E
right-of-way and all other regulatory agencies as necessary prior to
final plat approval.
ASSESSMENTS: The proposed site has been assessed for sanitary sewer
trunk and water area -under Project #254 at the single-family rate.
The development will be responsible for the following additional
assessments as a condition of final plat approval.
Description Rate Quantity Amount Proj #_
Trunk storm sewer $0.053/SF
Lateral benefit $12.47/ff
water main (B)
Lateral benefit $12.47/ff
water main (A)
Street - Safari Pass $35.44/ff
(A) Safari Pass
(B) Water tower road
2025540/SF
$107,350.00 316
609.29/ff
$ 7,598.00 366
1116.66/ff
$ 13,925.00 254
1011/ff
$ 35,830.00 254
Total
$164,702.84
'�?o( :)
All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the
final quantities contained in the final plat and in accordance with
the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
CONDITIONS: EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION
1. A revised grading plan shall be submitted to staff for their
approval prior to final plat approval. The following two areas
shall be addressed: (1) minimizing filling of existing low areas and
(2) revised street grades on the cul-de-sac street providing .access
to the water tower site.
2- Downstream storm sewer facilities shall be ordered by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
3- Storm sewer facilities shall be designed to adequately intercept the
runoff generated by the proposed development.
4- The appropriate ponding area easement shall be dedicated on the
final plat.
5- The development shall submit an erosion/sediment control plan
acceptable to staff.
6- Slope easements from the affected residents of Briar Oaks of Apple
Valley lst Addition shall be the responsibility of this development.
7- The development shall be responsible for providing storm sewer for
the existing drain at the water tower site.
8. The dead-end water mains in the two westerly cul-de-sacs shall be
interconnected.
9- The proposed water main connection in the southeasterly corner of
the development which follows the common lot line shall be
eliminated. Water service for Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 can be obtained
from existing water main in Safari Pass.
10. The development shall be responsible for providing a water main stub
to the adjacent northerly property.
11. Trunk sanitary sewer installation shall be ordered by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
12. The proposed sanitary sewer along the common lot lines in the
southeasterly corner of the proposed development shall not be
allowed.
13. Sanitary sewer service for Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 can be provided
from the existing sanitary sewer along Safari Pass.
14. Lots 10 - 14 inclusive, Block 2 shall be served by a sanitary sewer
lateral which connects to the existing sanitary sewer in Safari
Pass.
l`�r7
EAGAN ROYALE CONDITIONS
PAGE ,2
1,5. The proposed entrance/ through roadway into the site shall be
dedicated with a 60' right-of-way. The street width within the 60'
right-of-way shall be a minimum of 32' face -of -curb to face -of -curb.
16. The proposed cul-de-sac street shall be dedicated with a 50' wide
right-of-way, a minimum 60' radius on the bubble of the cul-de-sac,
and a minimum street width of 28' face -of -curb to face -of -curb.
17. In addition to common lot line drainage and utility easements, the
development shall be responsible for any additional easements
required for final approval of plans and specifications.
18. It shall be the responsibility of this development to provide
utility service to each individual lot in the proposed development.
19.
All standard plat
conditions
shall be adhered to.
20.
Variances for the
(2) 5001+
cul-de-sacs shall be granted.
21.
This plat shall be subject to
a Parks Dedication fee.
22.
Lot 8, Block 2
shall have
15' sideyard setbacks and a 'front
setback matching
Lot 9 or
a minimum 70' from the southern
property line.
T tg t�r•�
L.1 P
(% �
D•II C� P lEj
D -II -.,..
P D -III
J/
DIV
add
�, E : a o-•
1H a a
O� Oiji�7
b
66
;y J
s
/" N
i
N
� 2=l'�
6o •Y:l
•:iY _ ale:
• 1
i ;
•
A:
1t1YjV5;
�, E : a o-•
1H a a
O� Oiji�7
b
66
;y J
s
/" N
i
• 1
i ;
�, E : a o-•
1H a a
O� Oiji�7
b
66
;y J
s
/" N
4
LU
w
e
1 I X
9q
w
Lj
r.
C. -A"
{ALIt..
J w S
p t
v0
Z
4
W g,
W Z 2
C Q
-
C Zv
W
9CHOOL LLu
R
T H
41-�41417
21
pll;w
893 1 m
�, 9.1. A Pa RI 9/--,.
�i 1J \\, N. PRO
CEDAF
5 'R K
W
7
919.1
AP-
-925.6
930.6 2
OAP4605Aj"' 8\
946.
24'
"---q.
A P 46 J
9 4 5. 0 ; L�'T
948.5
P,
16L-- " , �54"
MA
LIFF.:
2nd
A
C,J6-00 15' 12 113',,' 4L-
P;63�5 SLY
88886.6126 A -cc
AP -23
RAFIN 889.3
AP49 900.01
881.7
889.0 A P. = I I/
889 z
"89,4.'7
P-25
80.5
AP -50 888.5
88.5
886.0 AP -42
-94.0 8950
8
j --- 11_11j
40
R 23 W
city of eagan
PUBLIC
C3 WORKS
.0
DEPARTME
_1tj
5.5
t 3:
7
4 2-1:
912.1
A3
'LE
.12
1935.0
AP -13 9376
)U., yi
!908 2 0a "'A P-14 4
4L:L `0 14. 6 912.1
919.3 L-- L!933.9,:-_
AP -44 _1047w,
,A -f
915.9
r
V L 9 �bf
--BID
F
is
P-48
920.61- Xr-
5 77
_934.
9:22,'O
9015,,?�
SAFA k
is APPLE
ESTA
vYy !
/0
LP -591
DKOTA COUNTY PARK 893.31
6,.A-Ayy 900.01
A -z'
LP
VALLEY
I N
SUBJECT PARCEL
. .........
EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION
NU. +11
approved: standard
I plate #:
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN/
or 8 1. 1,
all
19wm-....
WN'Iiwo�6
la
SL!
R,
R 23 W
SUBJECT PARCEL
EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION FIG. #3
City of eagan approved standard
PUBLIC WATER plate
WORKS k /-'MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT
STORM SEWER
00000 STREET/STORM
TRUNK 46.5 Ac.
SEWER LATERAL 1,011'
0 0 * 0 • WATER LATERAL BENEFIT 1,116.66'
APC Minutes
April 30, 1987
12. This development shall assume its assessment
responsibilities associated with trunk area storm sewer.
13. An 8 foot wide bituminous trailway shall be constructed
along the west side of Daniel Drive or located as determined by the
Parks Commission, as the responsibility of this development.
14. The westerly extension of Daniel Drive and its intersection
with the north -south major and minor connection to Diffley Road
shall have a "T" configuration.
15. A detailed storm sewer system shall be submitted and
approved by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or final
plat approval.
All members voted affirmatively.
EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
The 'fourth public hearing of the evening was then called by
Chairman Hall in regard to the applications of Partnership Royale
for rezoning of approximately 46.848 acres from A (Agricultural) to
R-1 (Single Family) and a preliminary plat consisting of 65 lots and
one outlot located in the southeast quarter of Section 31, abutting
Safari Pass on the- east and Cedar Avenue on the west, with a
variance for a cul-de-sac in excess of subdivision standards. City
Planner Runkle described the location, topography and lot
configurations for 73 single family lots. Mr. Marvin Eggum, one of
the partners, was present to introduce the proposal, in addition to
Mr. Mike Halley and Mr. Loren Spande, who indicated that their homes
would range in value from $220,000.00 to $600,000.00. Mr. Ralph
Wagner, engineer for the partnership, was also present to describe
the large lots which anticipate 100 foot widths at the setback line.
Mr. Wagner also indicated that some platting would have to be
delayed to interface with the Watschke property to the north. There
was no one from the public to address the issue. In regard to Mr.
Gustafson's question, the developer and Mr. Foertsch indicated that
the looping of.water lines could be resolved between City staff and
the applicant. Staff also indicated that the cul-de-sac and tear-
drop cul-de-sac issue had been resolved in addition to grading.
In response to questions regarding estate zoning, Mr. Spande
indicated that the architectural controls and requirements for
overall value of homesites would create an estate type development.
In response to member Wilkins' question in regard to the variance
for cul-de-sac, Mr. Colbert indicated that indeed it was necessary
due to the topography. In response to Chairman Hall's question, Mr.
Foertsch indicated that changes received by the staff in the last
two days from the developer, were responsive to staff's concerns
expressed in the report. He also indicated that staff could review
the matter prior to the City Council meeting if detailed plans were
k ;2lG
.. K
XPC 'M''iWA' s
April 30, 1987
submi-tted by the following Wednesday. Mr. Wagner indicated that the
developer --could comply- with this requirement. Mr. Runkle noted that
staff had requested the authority to allow setback variances to save
trees and topography.
Wilkins moved, Gustafson -seconded the motion'"'to recommend
approval of rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family).
All voted ;yes,.----
Wilkins
yes,: --
Wilkins moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the preliminary plat with a variance for the proposed
cul-de-sac, subject to the following conditions:
1. A revised grading plan shall be submitted to staff for their
approval prior to final plat approval. The following two areas
shall be addressed: (1) minimizing filling of existing low areas
and (2) revised street grades on the cul-de-sac street providing
access to the water tower site.
2. Downstream storm sewer facilities shall be ordered by
Council action prior to final plat approval.
3. Storm sewer facilities shall be designed to adequately
intercept the runoff generated by the proposed development.
.4: :The appropriate ponding area
shall be dedicated on
the final plat. -
5". The development shall submit an erosion/sediment control
plan acceptable to staff. -
6. Slope easements from the affected residents of Briar Oaks of
Apple Valley 1st Addition shall be the responsibility of this
development.
7. The development shall be responsible for providing storm
sewer for the existing drain at the water tower site.
8. The dead-end water mains in the two westerly cul-de-sacs
shall be interconnected if water pressure and volumes warrant such
looping.
9. The --proposed water main connection in the southeasterly
corner of the development which follows the common lot line shall be
eliminated. Water service for Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 can be obtained
from existing water main in Safari Pass.
10. The development shall be responsible for providing a water
main stub to the adjacent northerly property.
11. Trunk sanitary sewer installation shall be ordered by
Council action prior to final plat approval.
Z4ai7
APC Minutes
April 30, 1987
12. The proposed sanitary sewer along the common lot lines in
the southeasterly corner of the proposed development shall not be
allowed.
13. Sanitary sewer service for Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 can be
provided from the existing sanitary sewer along Safari Pass.
14. Lots 10-14 inclusive, Block 2, shall be served by a
sanitary sewer lateral which connects to the existing sanitary sewer
in Safari Pass.
15. The proposed entrance/through roadway into the site shall
be dedicated with a 60 foot right-of-way. The street width within
the 60 foot right-of-way shall be a minimum of 32 feet face -of -curb
to face -of -curb.
16. The proposed cul-de-sac street shall be dedicated with a 50
foot side right-of-way, minimum 60 foot radius on the bubble of the
cul-de-sac, and a minimum street width of 28 feet face -of -curb to
face -of -curb.
17. In addition to common lot line drainage and utility
easements, the development shall be responsible for any additional
easements required for final approval of plans and specifications.
18. It shall be the responsibility of this development to
provide utility service to each individual lot in the proposed
development.
19. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
20. Variances for the (2) 500+ feet cul-de-sacs shall be
granted.
21. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee.
22. Lot 8, Block 2, shall have 15 foot sideyard setbacks and a
front setback matching Lot 9 or a_minimum 70 feet from the southern
property line. -
23. Revised grading plan shall be submitted to the City staff
on or before May 6, 1987. If such plan is not approved at a
subsequent date or submitted timely, this matter shall be -considered
to be have been continued.
24. Setback variances shall be allowed pursuant to staff review
and approval to prevent unnecessary disruption of topography and
vegetation.
All voted yes.
The applicant was advised that vacation of 20 feet of right-of-
way for Safari Pass will require a separate public hearing.
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Nine
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR COUNTRY HOLLOW ADDITION
F. Rezoning of Approximately 45.47 Acres from A to R-1 and
Preliminary Plat for Country Hollow Addition --A public hearing was
held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular
meeting held on April 30, 1987, to consider a rezoning application
for 45.47 acres from A to R-1 and a preliminary plat for the Country
Hollow Addition consisting of 99 lots. The APC is recommending
approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat.
For additional information on the rezoning and preliminary plat
applications as presented, refer to the Engineering and Planning
Department reports, copies are enclosed on pages,?,20 through a�5_
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a cash
dedication for this proposed subdivison.
For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to page(s)
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
rezoning from A to R-1 and a preliminary plat entitled Country
Hollow Addition.
a V�'\
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT (COUNTRY HOLLOW
ADDITION)
APPLICANT: PROGRESS ENGINEERING INCORPORATED
LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 31
EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 30, 1987
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 22, 1987
REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATIONS: Separate applications have been submitted by Progress
Engineering requesting a rezoning of 45.47 agricultural acres to R-1
(single family) and a preliminary plat for the Country Hollow
Addition. This plat consists of 99 lots located north of Diffley
Road and just east of Dodd Road. The November, 1986 Land Use Map
designates this area D -II, 3-6 units per acre. No amendment will be
necessary.
SITE PLAN/CODE CONFORMANCE: This plat is surrounded by agricultural
parcels on all four sides including the area on the south side of
Diffley Road. The site has rolling topography with some very steep
slopes. The hillsides along the western property line and the area
abutting Diffley are among the steepest, containing dense hardwood
trees. This plan will save a majority of those creating a natural
buffer especially to Diffley Road. A single access to Diffley will
serve this property with stub extentions to the north and east.
The lots vary in size from 12,000 - 56,000 S.F. Most are between
12,000 - 14,000 S.F. The larger ones are due to ponding areas or
undevelopable hillsides. All lots will meet or exceed the 85' width
at the setback line. Staff recommends that'Lot 1, Block 1, be
granted a 30' setback along Diffley Road. Code requires 50' due to
the 100' right-of-way width. This lot will have its driveway on the
proposed street - the area along Diffley will act as a side yard.
R
GRADING & DRAINAGE: This proposed development is located adjacent
to some extremely rough and variable topography with maximum
differentials of approximately 90'. The most severe slopes are
located to the west and south adjacent to County Road 30. Because
of the severe topography, major grading will be performed over the
majority of the property to provide the required storm water storage
capacities and better define these drainage basins in relationship
to the adjacent buildable lots and streets. The preliminary grading
plan submitted does not indicate any encroachment into adjacent
private property to accommodate this development proposal.
This development is located in the lowest portions of the overall
larger drainage basin for the extreme eastern portion of the City.
Initially, the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan required the majority
of this proposed development to be used for storm water detention
purposes. However, through a detailed analysis of this portion of
the drainage basin, the storage volume within this development has
been reduced to a required 63 acre feet of storage with a controlled
water elevation established at 800 and an estimated high water flood
elevation of 818.0.
This development will require the installation of a major trunk
storm sewer lift station with a force main outlet pumping the water
northwest to Dodd Road and into the gravity storm sewer system being
constructed as a part of the overall Eagan Hill Farms concept
development.
Storm sewer laterals will have to be extended to the east line of
this development to provide outlets for the future ponding areas
located to the east. Similarily, a storm sewer extension will also
have to be provided at the north property line near the westerly
street extension and must be sized to accommodate direct runoff from
approximately 14.0 acres to the north. Another storm sewer
extension must be provided to the north property line along the
common rear lot lines within Block 5 for future runoff. It is not
anticipated that storm sewer interceptor laterals will have to be
extended to the south to the County Road right-of-way as all future
drainage should be conveyed and directed approximately 200' east of
this development into the easterly part of Pond JP -26 as a part of
the modified Comprehensive Storm Sewer system.
Due to the severe topography along the westerly edge of this
development, specific channelization and stabilization will have to
be performed on the side slopes to direct water to common lot lines
to propagate the existing drainage pattern based on existing
contours.
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL: Refer to the detailed report prepared
by the Soil and Water Conservation District regarding specific
concerns pertaining to this development.
UTILITIES: Presently, sanitary sewer and water main facilities'
necessary to allow this development are not immediately available in
the area.
e�:;� I
A major trunk sanitary sewer lift station will be installed within
this proposed development under Project 491 as a part of the overall
Eagan Hill Farm concept development plan. This lift station will be
sized accordingly to handle gravity flow generated from the internal
lateral distribution system to service this development. This lift
station will then pump sanitary flows through a force main to the
intersection of Dodd Road and County Road 30 into the existing trunk
sanitary facility. A trunk sanitary sewer line will have to be
installed to the northeast corner of this development to provide
future service to subdistrict C -KK, with another trunk sanitary line
to the east to service future subdistrict C -LL.
Water availability for this development will have to be provided
through the installation and extension of the trunk water main
system from the intersection of Dodd and Diffley Roads to the east
line of this development. This will also require the installation
of a trunk pressure reducing station to provide adequate pressures
for domestic use. It is strongly recommended that this internal
water main for this development be looped northwesterly to the trunk
water main extension in Dodd Road being provided as a part of the
Eagan Hill Farms development under Project 491.
STREET 'CIRCULATION: Due to the steep and rugged topography in this
general area and the undeveloped adjacent private property, there is
only one feasible access to this development from County Road 30
near the eastern end of this development. This developer has been
able to maintain a maximum 8s street grade throughout this
development through the extensive grading being proposed. All
streets should also provide a maximum 2s approach grade to all
intersections and a minimum of 75' from the existing edge of County
Road 30.
In order to accommodate emergency and maintenance vehicles, this
development must provide temporary turn-arounds either on the
adjacent private property or within this development for all
proposed dead-end stub streets. The proposed location of the stub
streets have been evaluated and appear to be properly located with
one exception. Three stub streets to the north are being proposed.
The middle street should be shortened and permanently cul-de-saced
due to its incompatibility for continuation based on existing and
forseeable future grades.
County Road 30 (Diffley Road) adjacent to the southern boundary of
this development presently exists as a two-lane rural county road.
There is no immediate or long-range schedules for the upgrading of
this segment of the county road system due to low projected traffic
volumes. Its current status is adequate to handle this proposed
development.
EASEMENT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development shall be
responsible for dedicating a 60' half right-of-way for Dodd Road
with a 20' construction easement to accommodate potential future.,
upgrading. All cul-de-saced streets shall have a minimim width of
50' with a 60' radius at the turn -around and a minimum 28' wide
street surface (face -of -curb to face -of -curb). All other through
streets shall have a minimum 60' right-of-way with a minimum 32'
street surface.
Q,;�_ Q
In addition to the common lot line drainage and utility easements,
additional easements along common lot lines shall be dedicated of
sufficient width to accommodate the sanitary sewer, water and/or
storm sewer extensions as required with the final approved plans and
specifications. The easements necessary for the water main looping
and storm sewer force main outlet across the property to the north
and west to Dodd Road shall be the acquisition responsibility of
this development. Also, all temporary cul-de-sacs constructed
outside of the boundaries of this development shall be acquired and
dedicated prior to final plat approval.
All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency (County
Highway, MPGA, Department of Health, etc.).
ASSESSMENTS: Due to the fact that no utilities have previously been
installed in this area, this development shall be responsible for
all trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer assessments as
a condition of final plat approval based on the rates in effect at
the time of final plat approval and final quantity calculations
providing appropriate credits for dedicated public right-of-way and
ponding easements.
In addition, this
development
shall prepay
its future assessment
obligations for the upgrading of County Road
30 based
on 25% of the
residential street equivalent
rate in effect at the
time of final
plat approval.
These assessment obligations are
estimated as
follows:
Item
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Project #
Trunk Area Water
37.87 ac
$1,250/ac
$47,338
491 (pending)
Trunk Area Sanitary Sewer
37.87
1,300/ac
49,231
491 (pending)
Trunk Storm Sewer
1,650,000 sf
0.053/sf
87,450
TOTAL $184,019
COUNTRY HOLLOW CONDITIONS:
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication fee.
3. Lot 1, Block 1, shall have a 30' setback or more along Diffley
Road.
4. The City Council must authorize the installation of trunk water
main and trunk storm sewer facilities necessary to service this
development prior to final plat approval.
5. A 60' half right-of-way and a 20' construction easement must be
dedicated for the future upgrading of County Road 30. All cul-
de-saced streets shall have a minimum right-of-way of 50' with
all remaining through streets having a minimum right-of-way of
60'.
6. In addition to the 10' common lot line drainage and utility
easement, additional easements shall be dedicated of sufficient
width to accommodate the installation of all required storm
sewer, water main and sanitary sewer facilities proposed to be
located outside of dedicated right-of-way.
7. This development shall provide and dedicate appropriate ponding
easements providing for 63 acre feet of storage based on a
controlled water elevation of 800.0 and a high water elevation
of 818.0.
8. This development shall install the required channelization and
related stabilization to convey existing drainage swales along
proposed common lot lines into the existing storm sewer system.
A minimum 20' drainage and utility easement shall be conveyed
over these drainage channels.
9. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of
all easements outside the boundaries of -this development as
necessary to provide water service and trunk storm sewer force
main outlets to serve this development in addition to any
permanent or temporary construction easements necessary to
accommodate temporary cul-de-sacs for dead-end streets.
10. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired in a time frame
required by the affected agency.
11. The middle of the proposed three -street connections to the
north shall be shortened and permanently cul-de-saced.
12. This development shall be responsible for all related
assessment obligations associated with its approval.
"?a
DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
MINNESOTA
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
April 7, 1987
TO: ,-like Foertsch
City of Eagan
FPOP: Lvnn M. Chakoian '�J^" w
Dakota County SWCD
RE: Country hollow Preliminary Plat
BACKGROUND:
Farmington Professional Building
821 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Phone: (612) 463-8626
A preliminary plat proposal for Country hollow was submitted
for erosion and sediment control review. Site, grading and
utility plans were submitted. An erosion and sediment
control plan has not been submitted.
SOIL AND WATER REVIEW:
Soil Resources
Three soil textures are found on this site: sandy loam,
loamy sand and Quam silt loam areas are present. The sandy
loam and loamy sand areas have a seasonal watertable that is
greater than 5 feet below the surface; these areas appear
not to nose limitations for the development. The Quam silt
loam presents limitations for the development --the seasonal
watertable is +2-1 feet below the surface. The Quam soil
areas are outlined in blue on the attached site plan.
1) Soil borings by a geotechnical firm should focus on
determining if the watertable is Perched.
2) Removal of this wet soil :material and replacement
with appropriately compacted fill should be planned
where street or building construction is indicated.
Water Resources
Two storm water holding ponds are to be constructed within
this develooment. The storm sewer Pipes entering the ponds
may need stabilization.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ��
3) The on-site drainage plan should be analyzed to
determine if the outlets require stabilization.
The site drainage plan also includes an outlet for the low
area in the northeast corner of the plat; the inlet does not
show grade in the direction the arrows indicate.
4) 't -le recommend that this area of the drainage plan b2
reviewed by the engineering staff.
We observed three steep channels entering the site from the
south and one from the north. These channels carry water
from significant drainage areas. Fill of the type proposed
on lots 11, 43 and 42 in block 2 will not be adequate. The
channel entering the stormwater pond through lots 12 and 13
will be difficult to restabilize after the ponding area cuts
have been made. These channels pose serious problems for
the stability of lots on this site.
5) In the erosion and sediment control plan, address
how the channels entering the site and the fill n_laced
within the channels will be stabilized and where
offsite water will be directed.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL:
Pio Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been submitted.
The plan should follow the "Checklist" and "General
Criteria" provided by the City of Eagan. Some specific
information follows that may be useful in preparation of the
plan.
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
within two days of completion of rough grading, the entire
site should be seeded and mulched to stabilize the disturbed
areas.
6) Seeding and mulching details, as identified on the
"Checklist", should be specified.
Structural measures needed for erosion control on this site
may include temporary gravel construction entrances, silt
curtain , and storm sewer inlet filters.
7) Detailed plans and proposed location of the
structural measures on a site map should be included.
The lots on steeper areas need to be "benched"; this grading
practice directs drainage into the hill and towards the `
street.
i
8) Show the benching feature on the grading plan and
provice a benching detail sheet.
EROSIOF CONTROL NAMAGrMENT
All erosion and sediment measures should be regularly
inspected and maintained as needed.
9) The individual responsible for maintenance _rust be
identified on the plan.
10) We recommend that a statement be placed on the
development plan that the home builders will be
responsible for E & SC during home construction.
Construction schedules impact what erosion control measures
will be necessary.
11) Include schedules for installing, utilities,
revegetation of those disturbed areas, building
construction and blac}:topping.
Disposition of erosion and sediment control measures needs
to be addressed.
12) Include a contact person responsible for final
clean up of the site.
CONCLUSIONS
we have been in contact with Progress Engineering concerning
other projects and have informed them about this erosion and
sediment control program and our requirements for new plans.
We hope that Erosion and Sediment Control Plans are
submitted with future Preliminary Plats.
We recommend that the Preliminary Plat be approved, but that
an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan be submitted and the
serious drainage concerns be addressed before a grading
permit is issued or final Plat approval.
cc: Warren Isrealson, Progress Engineering
r 10
aa%
If �
.W
D -II <<
/D-11INrH
SD
-II
° \
_•"figs: II W:•;
a
z�—
: I I oa
L
i:• :iFT .:
=3 WQ ,
W
a
�
0£ ON HVSD
f
°{
S C uG I 3.8J.OG.eO N
r t a N
r
N
a
Y
O
a • -
f J y
ii a
N
C
\ b Y
W
N
N
F
2
1Q ! L
O
z
.,
CL
i
OLL
w •u m ��� ♦ � p �N a
�'
at�
Ua
ti Pry �' �
le�•
/ j ~
`
2t�`bs�
J ♦ N
"1
LL
i
-
U
L)
Q
Z
b.l f , ff .6B M p1 G2CI
J
�WN
S 3 iSSSYYY ZSSYSSY
.............
...........
vf,
a
SYYYYSS YYSSYSYSZYSS �
/
SSSS SIYYYYZYSYYSSZSSSSY:
Y
Y
SSYSSSS 9SZYISSYZ? }
............. 33
------ - ----------------^_-_--
C6
" ---- csnA
C?�. 3
M 89'38' 71*w
COUNTRY HOLLOW
SUBJECT U JECT PARCEL
city of eagan SANITAR
PUBLIC Y SEWER
WORKS
MASTER PLAN.",
-DEPARTIVIENJ
FIG. +2
1
approved: standard
I plate #:
N 3T'Hv
-w
J P- 3-d
884.0
891.9
�JP-29
926.0
945.0 Ir
Lj
ti f r.5 �J- %--w
8822
J -P
JP- 201
8 0 6-
52.
855.6
JP -21 L.S.-17
8153
^j
840..0
JP -55
J P-1
i P
54 64
885872
.4
//JP -23
1 852.2
8574
2 JP -?-
843..
849.
JP -25
JP- 0
8 64.0 3 1,� JP -22 817.
820.7824.0
880.4 840.0 ;00 ......... ...... .
L.S. - I
i P
896.0 ji806.0
904.0 s,8240
- ------- 11A 30 'IT
J-
tii
-T I AUDITOR'S SUI NO. 4
L
JP -30
BJP -28 --DL
873.0
87-9.4
ARE
z
J.
N 3T'Hv
-w
J P- 3-d
884.0
891.9
�JP-29
926.0
945.0 Ir
Lj
ti f r.5 �J- %--w
8822
J -P
JP- 201
8 0 6-
52.
855.6
JP -21 L.S.-17
8153
^j
840..0
JP -55
J P-1
i P
54 64
885872
.4
//JP -23
1 852.2
8574
2 JP -?-
843..
849.
JP -25
JP- 0
8 64.0 3 1,� JP -22 817.
820.7824.0
880.4 840.0 ;00 ......... ...... .
L.S. - I
i P
896.0 ji806.0
904.0 s,8240
- ------- 11A 30 'IT
J-
tii
4/
964.0
-971.7 879.0
884.3
NUT
HILL 2--GL-P=50
=ARK
893.
844
JzI-
!
KE
LP -69 A 888.5 L.S
7 887.8
'-893
P
LP -48"-
t A -w 878.0 ` / l
J -bb
Tt
L A R K
L P-.:: -4 8RK
-24
COUNTRY HOLLOW
X -X
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG. #1
city of eagan approved: standardn
STORM SEWER late #:
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN-
-T I AUDITOR'S SUI NO. 4
L
BJP -28 --DL
"956.0 Q'I
969.4 H'-! JP -68 862.0
4/
964.0
-971.7 879.0
884.3
NUT
HILL 2--GL-P=50
=ARK
893.
844
JzI-
!
KE
LP -69 A 888.5 L.S
7 887.8
'-893
P
LP -48"-
t A -w 878.0 ` / l
J -bb
Tt
L A R K
L P-.:: -4 8RK
-24
COUNTRY HOLLOW
X -X
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG. #1
city of eagan approved: standardn
STORM SEWER late #:
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN-
RQAD�/ 12"!
67.0
,14 38.4/56.0
71.0
V12"
Li
58.0
50.3/67.0
La
179 1611
,ORO
117
53.7% 7 2.O
—door
ftmw agoA
55.0 12'
116 66.7/85.0
r
M.G. GROUND S,OZ,.".*-,>
5000 G.PM. BOOSTER
H.W.L 1059
�186
.0/ *4%
2011 .. ... ..
1020 - -- 1: 187"
30 .............
84:) 68.7/ 74.0QD 85
85.2/95.0 188
F74.4/82.0 16"
ALDi,_` SD. NO. 42
84.5/95-0 ............ .
(809
?011 1211
0 RylEr
zoo 70.8 76.o`
1641
4, 11211
rT, F
11, _02-01
47.5 /6 3.0 50.6/66.0 �-�I- - -
4
3.7/ 10' 0
,dkEWOOO
12,'
ir
COUNTRY HOLLOW
53A/72.6
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG. #3
City of eagan
WATER approved. standard
PUBLIC plate #: —
WORKS
co MASTER PLAN
C�
C4
m DEPARTIVIEN-d
SANITARY SEWER TRUNK 37.87 Ac.
STORM SEWER TRUNK 37.87 Ac.
WATER AREA 37.87 Ac.
I
I �
I .fw rwa.L•11Y I
C 5 4 H. NO. 30
L -N-
5
APC Minutes
April 30, 1987
COUNTRY HOLLOW ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
The next public hearing convened by Chairman Hall was in regard
to the application of Progress Engineering, Inc. for the rezoning of
approximately 45.47 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single
Family) and a preliminary plat consisting of 99 lots, located in the
west half of the southeast quarter of Section 24, abutting Diffley
Road on the south and east of Dodd Road. Mr. Runkle introduced the
proposal which included some difficult topography and future
proposed access to Dodd Road, with only one access to Diffley Road.
Mr. Warren Isrealson was present on behalf of the applicant and
questioned the requirements for temporary turn-arounds. Mr. Colbert
advised him that concrete curbs with an escrow for future removal
would be required with a 55 foot radius for turn -around area.
Mr. Don Klein, 4070 Dodd Road expressed concern regarding the
potential ponding areas. Mr. Klein also indicated that he had not
received a mailed notice in regard to the hearing. Mr. Runkle
indicated that the standard notice procedure was used with the
developer providing an abstractor's list of property owners within
350 feet. However, he indicated that notice would be sent also
prior to the hearing before the City Council.
In response to member Wilkins' questions, Mr. Colbert indicated
that while single access to Diffley Road was shown for the
development, future access was anticipated on Dodd Road.
Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family). All
voted aye, except Hall who abstained due to a potential conflict of
interest as owner of property adjacent to the property in question.
Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to.
2'. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee.
3. Lot 1, Block 1, shall have a 30 foot setback or more along
Diffley Road.
4. The City Council must authorize the installation of trunk
water main and trunk storm sewer facilities necessary to service
this development prior to final plat approval.
5. A 60 foot half right-of-way and
easement must be dedicated for the future
#30. All cul-de-saced streets shall have a
50 feet with all remaining through -streets
of -way of 60 feet.
4 2� �
a 20 foot construction
upgrading of County Road
minimum right-of-way of
having a minimum right -
APC Minutes
April 30, 1987
6. In addition to the 10 foot common lot line drainage and
utility easement, additional easements shall be dedicated of
sufficient width to accommodate the installation of all required =
storm sewer, water main and sanitary sewer facilities proposed to be
located outside of,dedicated right-of-way.
7. This development shall provide and dedicate appropriate
ponding easements providing for 63 acre feet of storage based on a
controlled water elevation of 800.0 and a high water elevation of
818.0.
8. This development shall install the required channelization
and related stabilization to convey existing drainage swales along
proposed common lot lines into the existing storm sewer system. A
minimum 20 foot drainage and utility easement shall be conveyed over
these drainage channels.
9. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of
all easements outside the boundaries of this development as
necessary to provide water service and trunk storm sewer force main
outlets to serve this development in addition to any permanent or
temporary construction easements necessary to accommodate temporary
cul-de-sacs for dead-end streets.
10. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired in a time
frame required by the affected agency.
11. The middle of the proposed three -street connections to the
north shall be shortened and permanently cul-de-saced.
12. This development shall be responsible for all related
assessment obligations associated with its approval.
All voted yes except Hall who abstained for the same reason as
previously indicated.
It was noted this matter would be heard by the City Council on
May 19, 1987.
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - RESIDENTIAL STREET WIDTHS
Chairman Hall convened the next public hearing concerning an
amendment to the residential street width Ordinance. Mr. Runkle
then introduced the proposed Ordinance amendment regarding
residential street widths, allowing for variations based upon ADT
(average daily trips). He indicated that the proposal was primarily
the result of the Developer's Task Force's efforts. Mr. Rod Hardy
who was present, and a member of the Developer's Task Force,
indicated his concern that the Task Force had received no notice of
the public hearing, nor that the draft had .been revised, deleting
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty
PRELIMINARY PLAT/WILLIAMS AND LA RUE ADDITION II
G. Williams and LaRue Addition II, Preliminary Plat for Five
Single -Family Lots on 1.9 Acres --This five lot, 1.9 acre single
family proposal was approved by the Advisory Planning Commission on
April 25, 1985, subject to 12 conditions. Earlier that month the
City Council denied the petition for utilities that would serve this
parcel. This item never went to the City Council since the utility
issue and assessment obligations could not be fully addressed until
the Wescott Road improvements were finalized.
The City Attorney's office has reviewed the request to proceed with
the original plan and it is their opinion that this item would not
need to go back to the APC for another public hearing.
The applicant is in agreement with the original conditions and the
adjoining property owners have been notified of the May 19 City
Council meeting. Enclosed is the original staff report on pages
through and also enclosed are APC minutes on page.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat entitled Williams and LaRue Addition II.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - WILLIAMS-LA RUE 2nd ADDITION
APPLICANT: DALE LA RUE
LOCATION: LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 1, WILLIAMS-LA RUE ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 25, 1985
DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 12, 1985
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS
PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval of
the Williams -LaRue 2nd Addition consisting of 5 single family lots on 1.9
acres. The proposal is located at the NE corner of Lexington Av. & Wescott
Rd.
ZONING & LAND USE: The parcel is zoned (R-1) residential single family and
has an existing home along. Lexington Av. A .65 acre pond is next to Wescott
Rd. & the east property line of the parcel. A major portion of the pond area
would be filled to create land for proposed Lots 4 & 5. The parcel is bordered
by Lexington Av. & Wescott Rd. to the west & south, single family houses are
- _--to—the .north -.&-.east..__— --- - — --- ---- -- — — ---_----
CODE COMPLIANCE: The Preliminary Plat shows 80' & 81' lot. widths for Lot
4 & 5. This is due to an attempt to provide Lot 3 with sufficient width to
allow for a 50' setback from Lexington Av. Lot 1 is shown with a 15' frontage
on Wescott Rd. for a driveway access. City Code requires a 60' minimum frontage
for platted lots. An alternative would be to create only 4 lots where each
could meet the lot width requirements.
GRADING & DRAINAGE: Existing drainage over this development is characterized by
a. large ridge across Lot 2 where an existing home is located. This ridge slopes
at 3:1 leading into a pond now covering the proposed pond area of Lot 1 and most
of Lots 4 & 5 of this proposed development. This pond is connected by overland
drainage to Pond JP 44 which is located to the north. Pond JP 44 has a positive
outlet that was constructed under the Lexington Place South development.
Proposed grading shows filling the southerly two-thirds of Lots 3, 4, & 5 and
creating a ponding area along the rear lot lines of Lots 4 & 5 and in Lot 1. It
will be the responsibility of this development to petition the City to install a
12" storm sewer line between the proposed ponding area and the storm sewer system
in Lexington Square. Lexington Square is the development to the south. This 12"
storm sewer will be the responsibility of the Storm Sewer Trunk Fund.
SANITARY SEWER: The sanitary sewer required to serve this project was proposed
under project number 442R. Project 422R was denied by the City Council due to
lack of public support.
WILLIAMS-LA RUE 2ND ADDITION
APRIL 25, 1985
PAGE 2.
k
Sanitary sewer could be served, to this development, by extending a line west
of a sub -trunk line located along the east property line of Parcel 030-53
(Barry Tilley). This sanitary sewer line would be the responsibility of this
development to install because the property owner of Parcel 030-53 is presently
being serviced by the trunk line of its east property line and therefore would
not benefit by installation of a sanitary sewer line within Wescott Rd.
WATERHAIN: An existing 181.' line is in place along the east side of Lexington
Avenue. The City would require this development to petition for a 12" trunk line
be installed down Wescott Road. Said 12" trunk line would be the responsibility
of -the watermain trunk fund with this development responsible for lateral benefit
costs.
STREETS: Lexington Avenue borders this proposed development along the west and
is an existing street classified as a minor arterial under the jurisdiction of
the Dakota County Highway Department. The ultimate design of this roadway is 52'
wide with bituminous surface, concrete curb and gutter and a 9 -ton load capacity.
No new access to Lexington Avenue should be allowed.
Wescott Road is an existing street, currently gravel, which borders this develop-
ment to the south. Wescott Road is classified as a community collector. The
ultimate design would be 52' wide, bituminous surface, and concrete curb and
gutter with a 9 -ton load capacity. Since Wescott Road is classified as a City
collector street, it will require a 6 -foot concrete sidewalk be constructed along
the north side. This sidewalk would be the responsibility of this development.
__.Staff _recommends _because of the projected high traffic volumes on Wescott Road
that driveways be combined for Lots 3 & 4 and 1 & 5.
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Both Wescott Road and Lexington Avenue currently have
50' half, right-of-way which should be adequate for future improvements.
A 20 -foot utility easement will be required to be dedicated over the alignment of
the 12" storm sewer line. Ponding and drainage easements will also be required
around the ponding area and along the lot line of Lots 1 & 2 to connect with Pond
JP 44.
ION
v
WILLIAMS-LA RUE 2ND ADDITION
APRIL 25, 1985
PAGE 3.
CONDITIONS:
1. All standard Preliminary Plat conditions shall be adhered to.
2. If the 5 lot scheme is approved, a Variance shall be granted to allow
the 15' frontage on Wescott Rd.
3. The filling of the pond area shall be done in conformance with MnDot speci-
ficat.tans 2105 and 2451.
4. This development will be responsible for petitioning -for the installation,
of a positive outlet from the ponding area and also the 12" trunk watermain.
5. No new access to Lexington Av be allowed.
6. A 6' concrete sidewalk along the north side of Wescott Rd shall be the
responsibility of this development.
7. The driveways for Lots 3 & 4 and Lots 1 & 5 be combined with appropriate
turn -grounds.
8. A 20' utility easement shall, be dedicated over the storm sewer line alignment.
9. Ponding & drainage easements will be required around the ponding area.
---10.—This- development.-.will-be.-responsible-_f.or.--.a11_unlevied _.trunk _-area_ rel.at-ed__.- _
assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting.
J4(
A I
,t1 I X11; N^5
LIF R_2
SCI C 83. .7,
P -
TCitRKi LB 3 eSCD`'
�.-
LB. 82_2 -
R-4
O'LEAhY PXRKj ADDITIO WE COTT
~� CARRIAGE
Ll
t ,
--H I Ls
P i
ter..A
LE • FcpE
IOU
PF
D..ON
�:.. `.RAILS R`_-
�! � :lit - %:. i�: � • - 1 I," l: ��•—s—= `r--�-..y ;—i!: �ee\ �.r� _ � i
`f
-34
t \ v;
___i I
T
Vt
C
_._.--....._.... 1 - -
�",a-.i fir- —� T i
T
-
1
LEXINGTON
ADD. -
K SQUARE
PK
PD L
1--1175-1
NORTHVIEW
PK -
__ PF
Preliminary Plat
DELMAR H. SCHWANZ
LAND SURVEYORS INC
Rpp-510te0 UnAM Lawq pl Th. SIM. of M,nnesola
14750 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 PHONE 612 623-1766
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
1
_ I /40 —� :/40 I1
I � I-
I PONDING'\_
L_ —104 _m 125
EASE MEKT--
.I
j—_ /S
co
H 3Yr
4i,5
ro4L46.4-1;3#5.
N; --_.;
� L. so
/SD I ,�.
ROAD EASEMENT � l6' 4Z
_ _ WE -S -GOT -Ti- ROAD
I
Owner -Developer:
Joyce and Dale LaRue
3780 Lexington Avenue
Eagan, MN 55123
Legal Description:
Lots 3.and 4, Block 1,
AND LARUE ADDITION.
,
i
i
WILLIAMS0
Present And Proposed Zoning:
R-1
Proposed
Lot Sizes:
Lot
1 22691
Sq.
Ft.
Lot
2 21272
Sq.
Ft.
Lot
3 13410
Sq.
Ft.
Lot
4 12000
Sq.
Ft.
Lot
5 12 000
Sq.
Ft.
Road
Easm. 1500 Sq.
Ft.
E
Scale: 1 inch s 100 feet
Proposed drainage &
utility easements are to t
10 ft. in width and
adjoining street lines anc
5 ft. in width and
adjoining side and rear
lot lines.
Proposed Name:
Williams And Larue 2nd Addition
Notes:
Z) Area to be served by sanitary
sewer (Eagan Sanitary Sewer,
Project No. 422R), water, and
storm sewer.
2) Low area on Lots 4 and 5 to be
filled and equal storage capaci.
ty to be created by dredging ou-
the northerly end of pond.
Elevation of pond to be control'
by proposed storm sewer outlet.
3) All lots to have minimum 5.0 foot w1de
utility easements on each side of lot line:
vr.::aw required. 10.00 foot wide easements
along all streets.
Date of Preparation: 4-1-85 NESOTA TIO NO. 8625
Revised: 4-10-85 ,1� 1 � RE ISTR �•
f -w- � 1A) w'4'e �
to Jz I fti")) S
a v�ec,�ow
f
w
x
ea.
W63eo7-7 ,eo,}D
— -- z P,eoP056_J_) CORM) .lf
67)57)A/6 coM76OX 11
,lAi�v� SGZo �✓D A-Av /T/D�+,/
¢-/ 8S
Y
w
x
ea.
W63eo7-7 ,eo,}D
— -- z P,eoP056_J_) CORM) .lf
67)57)A/6 coM76OX 11
,lAi�v� SGZo �✓D A-Av /T/D�+,/
¢-/ 8S
," " I
D 7 �4 -7 12
4
88.79'
8 L7s.
P
7
o
0000,-z AO -
Q=P 0_ n il. 4
!d
-DP�10
848.0 OP 9 2
9 860.0
P- J
10 TO G-3
,.jsc6i
-9 2 -7i
DP -23:-4
4 893 q DP -7:==.,- a
.0
8976 PARK, 882-2: ADD!
D WESCOTT
CARRIAGE
12" i HILLS
JP -14
110 0
OP -22 o0i, GARDEN )EN
8901 833.q)
B9.2 - i : ---873 0 854.6-
2' IN 1882 0 JP -IE
DP -25 L
.886.4 -- Fiz4cEl JP -33 8
33 '74-
8-92.0. -832.0 79.1
JP -59
13 .,:-,J 882.0 8540
18P;,4 88ZO 864.0
8.7 '-""8940 7-
jP '§, 2
67,? 6- 2 rp
901.5 8 ;360 97.j
8881 JP -60
895.5 a
-41 1p 812
��'JP
849.2^ 4-1 -- .: . 4,e 892.-.15 87:0
,;,854J 161 -41 L.S.-I P
893.5 ie 12 !��.S6.0
JP
L.S.- 11 885.3..
887.0
12' -63
1J; C:
7 - JP -32
--UTA� --' �7-;
44-- 888. 876.3
"99,
JP -II 9007 885.7 2 JP -31
P�.
830.0 /8840
895.7 880.4
0.7 8.95.-0 oil
21 j
i J -m JP -19 30
48- .,JP-58'Z:a,k . )874-0
877.5 �2L 882 0
JP -10
J -P
820.8 -- - ------ -%',O�, JP -30
830.0 873.0
J -f
Is. - 879.4
jp-
'Ll 77=: SQUARE 852s.
20
855.6
30. ip-PI %
J. I5.3
8 0
84' .0
7 l000
WATCH
2 1 lie,
J dd
- j1%. \�•
J -r
PJ JP -34I
ICK I J -S
819.S 884.0 JP -53
EAGAN, 891.9 864.0 820
830.
PAqK 880.4 84C
JP -29
926-
45.0
0:2 7-V
---�P8;1 0
t:s.
.9
904ZI
JP -51
I city of eagan
PUBLIC
01 WORKS
r'AC DA M
TME
................
................
SUBJECT PARCEL
................
................
FIG. * 1
approved - standard
STORM SEWER plate
MASTER PLAN/�
k-000
127
C -H2 :COITION
S
C a
10
C F(�
S
C -G- 7-7.7
�.7
30
~'C -NN
m
6:4:)
4T.
00.0 -
Is
C -pp
ILLE - 60M
C! m
15 27
27'
04 rF?I, K
E' AGAN C — I I
P69K
1-7
city of eagan
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTME
SUBJECT PARCEL
SANITARY SEWER
MASTER PLAf�/,qA�
FIG. *2
approved: standard
I plate #:
I city of eagan
PUBLIC
.1 WORKS
co
M IDA 0
Cm
J., I TME
I 111VI �
L
'23-
59.8/76.0 51.4/65.0
118.4/29.0
PAr.RwK � F�o a-; 0 Z.
U,' EAGAN
%
PARK
6 M.G. GROUND STORAGE
5000 QRM. BOOSTERH.WL 1059
EO (i83)
176 68.0/82.0 ai (18288.0, 24
1020
680/"0%72 0- 'n.
184 68.7/74.0
35-5/50 0 238 121.
F7:
185 1
= w 74A/82.0
186.0/91.0
EEL-
5UBJECT PARCEL
WATER
MASTER PLAN
FIG. *3.
approved - standard
I plate #:
105 )53. 2/68.Q-'-
L
w
16 AvnAj r
L
--:.NO. 2
JLKCN;Z, _E i
I city of eagan
PUBLIC
.1 WORKS
co
M IDA 0
Cm
J., I TME
I 111VI �
L
'23-
59.8/76.0 51.4/65.0
118.4/29.0
PAr.RwK � F�o a-; 0 Z.
U,' EAGAN
%
PARK
6 M.G. GROUND STORAGE
5000 QRM. BOOSTERH.WL 1059
EO (i83)
176 68.0/82.0 ai (18288.0, 24
1020
680/"0%72 0- 'n.
184 68.7/74.0
35-5/50 0 238 121.
F7:
185 1
= w 74A/82.0
186.0/91.0
EEL-
5UBJECT PARCEL
WATER
MASTER PLAN
FIG. *3.
approved - standard
I plate #:
r �
APC Minutes
April 25, 1985
WILLIAMS & LaRUE 2nd ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
The next public hearing convened by the Chairman concerned the application
of Dale LaRue for preliminary plat approval of the Williams & LaRue 2nd
Addition consisting of 5 single family lots on 1.9 acres. The location is at
the northeast corner of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. Greg Ingraham
introduced the proposal and noted the zoning is currently R-1. He stated that
the City Council held a hearing regarding the utilities and that the affected
property owners all opposed the improvements and therefore, the application
for utility improvements was denied.
Mr. LaRue was present and also Kelmer Bratland, owner of the property to
the east. Mr. Bratland asked whether additional assessments would be levied
against his property and also questioned the location of the street access.
He opposed further assessments and opposed the access easement adjacent to the
west line of the property. Mr. LaRue stated that he will re -petition for
utilities and it was noted that the 15 foot strip along the west line would be
for access to one lot only. Mr. Bratland also objected to filling in any
portion of the pond in the proposed plat, but it was noted that the storm
sewer outlet for the pond will be provided, according to Mr. Hefti.
Member Trygg noted the three lots will require a variance below the 85
foot minimum lot width, and Member Mulrooney noted 4 lots will eliminate the
need for any variances. Mr. LaRue opposed the reduction to four lots, noting
lots to the north and to the south provide for as low as 60 foot frontage.
There was discussion whether the 15 feet would be adequate for snow storage.
Mr. Hefti noted that the side lot easement would add area for snow removal.
After discussion, Harrison moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to approve the
application, subject to the following:
1. A determination should be made as to the feasibility of the
installation of utilities prior to final plat approval.
2. Variances shall be allowed in view of the configuration of the land in
relation to the surrounding properties.
3. Standard preliminary plat conditions shall be adhered to.
1-
4. If the 5 lot scheme is approved, a variance shall be granted to allow
the 15 foot frontage on Wescott Road.
5. The filling of the pond area shall be done in conformance with MnDOT
specifications 2105 and 2451.
6. This development shall be responsible for petitioning for the
installation of a positive outlet from the ponding area and also the 12 inch
trunk watermain.
7. No new access to Lexington Avenue shall be allowed.
8. A 6 foot concrete sidewalk along the north side of Wescott Road shall
be the responsibility of this development.
%a�k6i
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -One
REVIEW AND CONSIDER TWO AND FIVE YEAR ACTION PLANS FOR EDC
A. Review and Consideration of Two and Five Year Action -Plans for
the Economic Development Commission --During the past four (4)
months, the Economic Development Commission has held its monthly
meeting and discussed a work plan for both a two year and five year
projection. Enclosed on pages "throughc�S/ is a copy of the
two year action plan and five year action plan as prepared by the
EDC. Many of the items listed as work tasks will require monitoring
by the EDC, however, some items will require more involvement by
members of the Commission. Examples include the labor survey and
public relations/promotional material. Some of the work tasks are
ongoing from those work tasks identified previously by the EDC and
City Council as a part of the Star City effort.
Action is required by the City Council to confirm both the Two Year
and Five Year Action Plans with or without modifications.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or modify the
Eagan Two Year and Five Year Action Plans as presented by the
Economic Development Commission.
Resignation of David Kleimola
Enclosed on page �6Q- is a letter from Dave Kleimola who is
resigning as a member of the Eagan Economic Development Commission
due to the sale of his business and the fact that he is not a
resident of the City of Eagan. The City Administrator would like
direction regarding a replacement for Mr. Kleimola who represents
small retail.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve and accept the
resignation of David Kleimola as a member of the Eagan Economic
Development Commission.
a 41
EAGAN TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN
ASSIGNMENT MATRIX
�� Q
WORK TASKS
ASSIGNMENT
STAFF COMMISSION
COMPLETION
DATE
1.
Update Five -Year
City Administrator
Community
July
1,
1987
Capital Improvement
Public Works
Assessment
Plan
Director
2.
Update Labor Survey
City Administrator
Industrial
Oct.
1,
1987
City Planner
Call
3.
Solid Waste Study
Solid Waste
Community
Dec. 31,
1987
Abatement Comm.
Assessment
4.
Review Financing and
City Administrator
Community
Jan.
1,
1988
Economic Development
Assessment
Tools including Eco-
nomic Development
Authority and
Revolving Fund
5.
Review Zoning Code
City Planner
June
1,
1987
Classifications In-
cluding Freeway Category
6.
Upgrade County/
Public Works
Jan.
1,
1988
City Collector Roads
Director
7.
24 Hour Emergency
City Administrator
July
1,
1987
Care Center
City Planner
8.
Update Star City
City Administrator
Public
Nov.
1,
1987
Book, Slide Set,
Relations
Promotional Materials
& Review Promotional
Material
9.
Develop Categorized
City Administrator
Public
Oct.
1,
1987
Presentation File
Relations
10.
Review Industrial
City Administrator
Industrial
Sept.
1,
1987
Call Process/Budget
Call
Review Industrial Mix
-
11.
Monitor Airport
City Administrator
Jan.
1,
1988
Adequacy Developments
�� Q
EAGAN FIVE YEAR ACTION PLAN
ASSIGNMENT MATRIX
WORK TASKS ASSIGNMENT COMPLETION DATE
STAFF COMMISSION
1.
Promote Large and
City Administrator
Public
Small Retail
City Planner
Relations
Facilities
2.
Construct Eagan
Park & Rec. Dir.
Public
Community Center
City Administrator
Relations
3.
Promote Seneca
Director of
Treatment Plant
Public Works
Expansion
4.
Develop 5 -Year
Director of
Major Street Plan
Public Works
5.
Develop Schedule of
Director of
Trunk Utility
Public Works
Completion
6.
Develop Commercial-
City Administrator
Industrial
Industrial Databases
City Planner
Call
7.
Identify and Study
City Planneg
Industrial Call
Redevelopment Needs
City Administrator
and Community
Assessment
8. Assess Airport City Administrator
Impacts and
Alternatives
9. Assess Mass Transit City Planner Community
Needs Public Works Assessment
Director
1987-1989
1989
1989
1987-1989
1987-1989
1987-1990
1988
1987-1991
1987-1988
10. Monitor Concepts City Planner Community 1987-1988
of Senior Life Assessment
Style Housing
11. Monitor Legislative City Administrator Industrial Call
Action City Planner
a�l
PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Yankee Square / East Professional Building
3435 Washington Drive / Eagan, Minnesota 55122
612/452-8300 Telex 495-0772
April 22, 1987
Mr. Larry Wenzel
Chairman
Eagan Economic Development Commission
Subject: Resignation of David L. Kleimola, Secretary SEDC
Dear Chairman and Fellow Commission Members,
In lieu of the fact that Professional Travel Management Co.,Inc.
has been sold to Meeting & Travel Concepts,Inc. of Eden Prairie,
and .the management of Meeting 8 Travel Concepts has decided not to
maintain an Eagan.retail office outlet, I feel it is necessary
to resign from the commission as a representative of the retail
business community and as your secretary.
After four years of service during an exciting growth period in
Eagan, and a period in which the city has scored many pluses:i.e.
Star City status, freeway opening, Town Center, Sperry addition,
Northwest Airlines, 24 Hour Medical Facility, High School, and
rapid commercial and residential expansion, I find it difficult
to have to give -up a "winner".
�� I wish Eagan, the city staff and members of the commission
continued success in your most worthy goals:..and objectives.
Respe tf lly,
David L. Kleimola
Executive Vice President
PTM Co.
Secretary, Eagan Economic Development Commission
�®� International Air Transport Association
��
ARC Airlines Reporting Corporation
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Two
RESOLUTION/PART 150 STUDY
B. Resolution Concerning the MAC FAR Part 150 Study --The City has
received a copy of the Part 150 Study which is approximately 3" in
thickness and must respond to a public hearing that will be held on
May 21 at the MAC general offices. The FAR Part 150 submittal
describes two documents to be submitted to the FAA by the
Metropolitan Airports Commission which is elected to conduct the
Part 150 program. The noise exposure map defines the noise
compatibility problem and the noise compatibility program describes
the operational land use solutions. The Part 150 submittal builds
upon the extensive work completed since the early 1970's in noise
abatement, including the 1981 noise abatement operations plan and to
integrate the operational actions which land use management actions
geared toward both preventative and corrective land use measures to
provide a comprehensive program. Since the record only remains open
for five (5) working days after the public hearing, it was
appropriate for staff to prepare a resolution concerning the Part
150 Study. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein has prepared a
lengthy resolution which attempts to address issues of importance to
the City of Eagan. After the record is closed, the document and
comments will be referred to a MAC committee for a final report to
the MAC. Final MAC action, submitting the documents to the FAA is
expected on June 15. For a copy of the resolution concerning the
MAC Far Part 150 Study, refer to the resolution enclosed on pages
c [
through o"7�.
For a copy of the eAecutive summary prepared for Part 150 submittal,
refer to pagesc;7S_T through cQR 1
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve with or without
modification the resolution entitled "A Resolution Concerning the
MAC FAR Part 150 Study."
as3
CITY OF EAGAN
RESOLUTION
CONCERNING THE MAC
FAR PART 150 STUDY
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) has undertaken
the Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 Study for purposes of providing
a comprehensive noise abatement plan and procuring federal funding assistance
for the implementation of such plan, and
WHEREAS, FAR Part 150 requires a review and assessment of both
operational and land use alternatives appropriate to the region, and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has and continues to support the airport
as a regional amenity and with respect to its environment, has and continues
to support noise abatement strategies and the study of alternatives to reduce
noise impacts from current levels, and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has anticipated noise impacts to the
extent possible based upon representations of the MAC and the FAA and has
maintained or modified land use planning and zoning to provide a substantial
area of compatible land use, and
WHEREAS, the MAC has recommended a Noise Compatibility Program as
part the FAR Part 150 submittals incorporating both operational and land use
elements and has requested comment on the program from the public and effected
agencies at a public hearing on May 21, 1987, and
WHEREAS, the conduct of the FAR Part 150 Study process has resulted
in an uneven treatment of its elements, input regarding those elements and the
effected communities and, therefore, conclusions of widely varied substance
and adequacy, and
WHEREAS, given the qualifications above, the City of Eagan finds
certain elements of the Noise Compatibility Plan to be reasonable and
supportable and others to be unnecessarily detrimental, poorly substantiated
and absent adequate public notice given the gravity of their impact, -
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan supports the
general concept of the FAR .Part,1,50 Study Noise Abatement Program and its
operational elements with the following qualifications;
1. NA2 - Exempt the Quietest Stage 3 Aircraft from Noise Abatement
Flight Tracks - Differential analysis does not yet exist to
substantively justify the costs of this systematic degradation
of noise abatement flight tracks such as those in the Eagan -
Mendota Heights Corridor. Moreover, the inclusion of DC-10, L-
1011 and 7147 aircraft in the Stage 3 definition places an undue
burden on residential areas when commercial -industrial
alternatives exist. Absent adequate analysis and public
process, the City cannot support this element. .
2. NA3 - Negotiate with the Airlines a User Fee to be Levied on
Landings by Stage 1 and Stage 2 Aircraft, with Revenues to be
Used for Noise Compatibility Programs -The City of Eagan
strongly supports the use of differential landing fees to
increase operating costs for noisier aircraft. By introducing
ash
an economic disincentive, airlines' financial decisions will
tend toward quieter aircraft while dedicating the proceeds to
the reduction of noise impacts.
3. NA4 - Relocate Runway 4-22 to the South of Runway 11L -29R -The
City of Eagan reserves comment on this element until full
documentation of its impacts is available. The obvious
benefits of the relocation to the Preferential Runway System
(PRS) may be offset by new or expanded effected populations.
If the extension is necessary to expand airport capacity, it
should be analyzed in that light, but its noise abatement
benefit must be proven before the City can support it.
4. NA? - Negotiate New and Binding Agreements with the Operators
for Nighttime Use; et. seq -The City of Eagan strongly supports
the maintenance of low volumes of nighttime operations as such
are among the most detrimental to an acceptable noise
environment.
5. NA9 - Obtain FAA Agreement to Implement the Cedar Avenue
Procedure for Aircraft Departing Runway 22 -The City of Eagan
reserves comment on this element until full documentation of
its impacts is available. It is not yet proven that the
procedure enhances PRS capacity, abates noise or will be flown
under the Part 150 Study assumptions. Absent adequate
documentation, support of this element would not be
appropriate.
6. NA10 - Tighten Up Procedures for Keeping Aircraft Departing
Runways 11 L and 11 R to the "Eagan Corridor" -The City of Eagan
introduced this element of the Part 150 Study and believes the
concept to be integral to its support of the study. To date,
however, it has not been adequately addressed.
a. Established Corridor - The established land use corridor was
based on representations of the MAC and FAA concerning
historic f light track assumptions. These assumptions are no
longer in use by the tower.
b. Prescribed Procedure - The City of Eagan requested a review
of the procedur.e.in place at the outset of the Part 150
Study. The procedures were modified in a tower order dated
ten days after the Eagan request. In essence, the
consultant then studied compliance with a procedure
implemented after the study began, bearing marginal.
relationship to the land use provided.
c. Non -Compliance - The consultant's "compliance study" which
identifies eighteen percent non-compliance lasted less
than one day and has not been supported by recent MAC and
HNTB studies. Moreover, these studies have shown up to two-
thirds of all departures are more than five degrees deviant
from the established land use corridor assumptions.
a 5-s'-
d. Impact. - The consultant's conclusion of minor impact as a
result .of corridor compliance was graphically refuted by
comparison of its original and modified Part 150 base maps.
Dramatic variations in impact area resulted from modified
concentrations within the same operational area. Therefore,
substantial benefits can accrue from adequate operational
standards.
e. Qualified Support - The City must predicate its support of
the Part 150 Study on the adequate study of and acceptable
findings concerning the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor. A
study has been approved by the MAC to address the best means
of utilizing appropriate flight track modifications to place
the worst of the impact at the middle of the compatible land
use. Only upon acceptable completion of the study, will the
City endorse this element of the Program.
7. NA12 - Enforce and Optimize Nighttime Run-up Policy -The City of
Eagan strongly supports the enforcement of the nighttime run up
policy. Further, it encourages the installation of equipment
and adoption of procedures necessary to mitigate run-up noise
impacts.
8. NA13 - Improve the Monitoring and Enforcement of All Noise
Abatement Measures -The City of Eagan strongly supports this
element, particularly with respect to off -airport noise
monitoring. Permanent monitoring locations should be located in
noise sensitive areas of all noise impacted communities.
9. NA14 - Install a Microwave Landing System at MSP -The City of
Eagan strongly supports the early installation of MLS and other
navigational aid systems to better control flight tracks and
altitudes over the effected communities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan supports the FAR Part
150 Study Noise Abatement Program land use elements with the following
qualifications:
1. Preventative Land Use Measures (LU1-LU5) - The City'of Eagan is
generally compliant with the Metropolitan Council Guidelines.
Further it supports the concepts of zoning performance standards
and the necessary building code revisions to implement them.
2. Corrective Land Use Measures (LU6-LU10) - The City of Eagan will
consider -soundproofing of public and private buildings,.
acquisition of developed property and purchase guarantees as
potential corrective strategies, provided the City has the right
of review and approval of any such program. The City will only
consider these alternatives when operational means of noise
abatement have been exhausted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan does not recognize the
validity of the 1987 and 1992 Noise Exposure Maps upon which the land use
elements are predicated because:
1. Flight track assumptions in the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor
area are neither historically supported nor consistant with the
cited Metropolitan Council guidelines.
a s&
2. Flight track assumptions in the Eagan -Mendota Heights area fan
air traffic unnecessarily thereby impacting residential areas
and underutilizing the noise absorbing capacity of the
compatible corridor.
3. No differential analysis exists showing current operations to be
the most effective use of the noise compatible corridor.
4. Certain residential areas lying within the Ldn 65 contour are
not depicted as such and certain noise sensitive public
facilities are misrepresented or omitted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff be directed to prepare oral and
written comments consistent with these findings for introduction into the
public record of the Metropolitan Airports Commission.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
Motion made by:
Seconded by:
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated:
CERTIFICATION
I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in
a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1987.
E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
City of Eagan
as7
S
MINNEAPOLIS -SAINT PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Federal Aviation Regulation Part 150 Study
SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS
SUMMARY REPORT
MAY 1987
Prepared by
HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF
Table of Contents
Figures
Follows
Page
Figure 1. Noise Exposure Map 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Figure 2. Noise Exposure Map 1992 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Table
Follows
Page
Noise Compatibility Program Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
X59
Page
Introduction . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
Consultation . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . • . • • •
2
Noise Exposure Maps .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 4
Noise Compatibility
Program . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 6
Noise Abatement
Measures . . . . . . . . • • .
• • • • • • • 6
Land Use Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 12
Preventive
Land Use Measures . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 12
Corrective
Land Use Measures . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 14
Implementation . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 17
Figures
Follows
Page
Figure 1. Noise Exposure Map 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Figure 2. Noise Exposure Map 1992 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Table
Follows
Page
Noise Compatibility Program Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
X59
INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes the FAR Part 150 documents to be submitted to
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) by the Metropolitan Airports
Commission (MAC). These submittals describe the Noise Exposure Maps and
the- proposed Noise Compatibility Program for Minneapolis -St. Paul
International Airport.
Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 was promulgated by the FAA
in 1984 in compliance with the Airport Safety and Noise Abatement Act of
1979. Its stated objectives include:
o establishing a uniform system of describing aircraft noise and
noise exposure nationally, to eliminate confusion resulting from
use of different descriptors in different communities;
o describing land use compatibility criteria for the guidance of
local communities, but recognizing that these criteria will be
influenced by local values and factors; and
o providing technical assistance to airport operators and other
governmental agencies to prepare and execute noise compatibility
planning and implementation programs.
The stress is on programs of actions which provide a balanced and
coordinated programmatic response to the problems, rather than the piece-
meal response which has, in the past, typified the reaction of many
communities. To this end, a comprehensive listing of categories of
measures to be addressed is included in the regulation, categories which
include noise abatement and land use management actions..
The approach adopted in the study at Minneapolis -St. Paul International
Airport (MSP) was to build upon the extensive work completed since the
early 1970's in noise abatement, including the 1981 Noise Abatement
Operations Plan, and to integrate the operational actions with land use
management actions to provide a comprehensive program.
The regulation describes two documents to be submitted to the FAA by
airport operators electing to conduct a Part 150 program. The Noise
Exposure Map (NEM) defines the noise compatibility problem, and the Noise
Compatibility Program (NCP)' describes the operational and land use
solutions. The FAR Part 150 submittal for Minneapolis -St. Paul
International Airport includes both the Noise Exposure Maps and the Noise
Compatibility Program in a single package. The complete set of Part 150
submittal documents is available for public review at the offices of the
Metropolitan Airports Commission, 6040 28th Avenue South, Minneapolis.
f
pp
CONSULTATION
The FAR Part 150 Compatibility Program recommendations were developed
under the auspices of the MetropolitanA-rcraftSound Abatement Council
(MASAC), the established forum for the consideration of aircraft noise
abatement in the Minneapolis -St. Paul area. In addition, consultations
were conducted with the individual agencies where appropriate.
The development of the noise compatibility program was part of an
on-going process that goes back to the early 1960s. Significant items in
this process follow.
- Formulation of the current noise abatement program, which has been
subject to continuing revision to meet changing needs and
conditions since it was first put in place in 1969.
- Preparation of the Noise Abatement Operations Plan in 1981.
- Adoption of the Metropolitan Council land use guidelines and
policy contour in 1983.
- Activities by MAC and Governors Task Force in 1986 to find a
solution to growing public concern regarding noise.
- The continuing activities of the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound
Abatement Council since 1969.
- The continuing activities of MAC staff.
In the development of the recommended program, the Metropolitan
Aircraft Sound Abatement Council was the primary means of disseminating
information to the public and of receiving data and comments from airport
users, concerned agencies and groups, and members of the public.
There were other opportunities for public participation in the
development of the recommendations. These included the Governors Task
Force on Airport Noise, which presented its recommendation in a report
dated January 2, 1986; the Metropolitan Airports Commission, which
recommended a seventeen point program of noise compatibility measures on
January 7, 1986, and a more extensive program of noise abatement actions in
April 1986; and the Noise Budget Working Group, established by MAC in May
of- 1986 to examine the feasibility of a noise budget ordinance and to
report to the Commission in November of 1986.
Air carriers and other airport users are members of MASAC and
participated in discussions of noise compatibility measures. Attachment 10
to the full set of Part 150 documents includes further details of the
consultation process.
a��
All meetings of.MASAC, as well as those of other committees and task
forces concerned with airport noise, were open to the public. Many
meetings included opportunity for public comment during the development of
the recommendations. Additional meetings were held principally to provide
a forum for public comment.
A public hearing on the Part 150 noise compatibility program for
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport will be held in late May.
Following that hearing and consideration of public comments, the Part 150
documents will be revised and formally.submitted to the FAA.
11
11
WO
NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS
The NEM submittal consists of two maps, one depicting existing
conditions, and one showing noise exposure for aircraft activity forecast
five years in the future. The existing and 1992 Noise Exposure Maps for
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport are presented as Figures 1 and
2. Originals of these maps, at a scale of one inch to 2000 feet, are
available for inspection at the offices of 'the Metropolitan Airports
Commission.
The Noise Exposure Maps show noise contours for existing and future
aircraft operations at MSP. The noise descriptor used on the NEM is the
Day -Night Noise Level (DNL or Ldn). The use of the Ldn metric is specified
in FAR Part 150 to provide a uniform system of evaluating aircraft noise
exposure nationally. Ldn is a widely accepted noise descriptor and is
recognized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of
Transportation, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and by
many state and local agencies as an appropriate measure of community noise
exposure from a variety of sources.
Ldn is the 24-hour energy -averaged sound level in A -weighted decibels,
with a 10 decibel penalty added to noise events between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00
a.m. The Ldn values and contours (lines connecting points of equal Ldn)
were calculated using the Integrated Noise Model (INM) Version 3.8. The
INM is a computer model that uses as its inputs the numbers of aircraft
operations, fleet mix, time of day, runway use, takeoff and landing
profiles, flight tracks, and other factors. The flight tracks used in the
model are depicted on the NEM.
The Noise Exposure Maps show contours of Ldn 65, Ldn 70, and Ldn 75.
The future noise contours assume the implementation of the additional noise
abatement measures recommended in the Noise Compatibility Program. The
maps also show land uses in the vicinity of the airport and the areas of
land use that are not compatible with the aircraft noise levels within each
contour. The non -compatible land uses are determined by the compatibility
criteria developed by the FAA and included in FAR Part 150. Generally, all
land uses are considered compatible with noise levels below Ldn 65.
The locations of noise sensitive public buildings are indicated on the
Noise Exposure Maps. Properties on or eligible for the National Register
of Historic Places are also located on the map.
The estimated population residing within each contour is presented in
the following table.
E
Ldn
Estimated Population
Within Contour
Contour
Existing
Future (1992)
--------------------------------------------
65-70
Ldn
14,520
11,456
70-75
Ldn
3,820
2,152
75+
Ldn
204
53
TOTAL
65+
Ldn
18,544
13,661
The existing and future Ldn 65 contours lie within a portion of
Hennepin and Dakota Counties. In Hennepin County, the contours affect
parts of the cities of Minneapolis, Bloomington and Richfield. In Dakota
County, the contours affect parts of Mendota Heights and Eagan.
A number of other public and planning agencies also have jurisdiction
within the Ldn 65 contour. The Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities
Area is the regional planning agency for the.seven-county area and has the
role of reviewing the comprehensive land use plans of the local
communities. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (PCA), a state agency,
has the responsibility for control of noise throughout the state.
0
-a
N
O
Ln
a
CL
w
0�
r
:
a
N
Q
F
• •
W
� � 7
W
Z
y ° O
7
L Z •
• • •°
(�
••
•
E
•
GLU
O •
1
i
O
J
W
° S H
O O •
==;a�.d
O ° O: e /z
e
CL
°
E ° .. i.
W
o
s `
a E a e:
o, e n
= a Z 2 y
r x u 1 u s° >
Z i� v u.
d
H
I
Z
i
I-
OD
0)
T.
CL
m
d
N
O
CL
K
W
44
O
` Z
.7
0
L
r�
L
L
0
Q.
L_
_
.C_
_
L
_
a
CL
_
�n
N
—
0
Q
a
a�
N
N
•
N
S O
F
Z
i •
• a
W
• s � C
- � � O �
j � `'
N
Lu
�
N
y9 e
Lu
J
S N
°•Iz
•O. r
N
_
y 0
r S- 0 •t !
O• O
O 9
: N s Z V
Z U ° V >
z u V<
�I
Z
i�F• ■ ♦�
a d v_ ari s a
I S I
v
LL
cCo, (o
NOISE COMPA IEILIT'Y PROGRAM
-ise compatibility program measures fall into two basic
='t are noise abatement or Operational measures, which have
ar reducing noise exposure in the populated areas near
?aul International Airport. Second are land use management
are tbsigned to eliminate existing non -compatible uses and
:tern of cDmpatible land uses in the airport vicinity.
3f identifying noise abatement and land use measures to be
'art 130 Noise Compatibility Program included:
by MASAC and MAC staff of potential measures;
.on of measures and review with airport users and agencies;
idation by MASAC to MAC;
f action program by MAC. This implemerts certain of the
!commendations, identifies measures which should be studied
detail, and prepares one measure beyond the program
:ded by MASAC, mainly installation of an MLS at MSP.
EASURES
se abatement measures are recommended in the Noise
gram for Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. They
=eTher vi.th an assessment of the relative contribution of
:festiveness.
:3t byordinance a
i International A
rt,
-in noise budget for Minneapolis-
rt,
innea olis-
;AC recommendation of March 27, 1986, was that a noise
abung the lines of that in place at McArthur/Islip Airport
grated for MSP. The MAC Noise Abatement Program of May
:plemented this recommendation by establishing a working
-th the assignment of evaluating the feasibility of such
;nanr_e and reporting back to the Commission in November
Me zeport of the working group, together with a draft
z*, -and. associated documents, appears as Attachment 6 to
i Mittal, available for inspection at the MAC offices.
ft ordibance was the subject of a public hearing conducted
:arp 2$, 1987. Upon review of the comments from the
.from agencies and from airlines, MAC staff has
coded a revised version of the ordinance which would
i10 the restrictions an the amount of noise energy
:gal operators would be allowed to make. This' revised
of the ordinance is proposed as a measure in the Noise
oility program.
4
The phased -in ordinance, as proposed, would initially (June 1987)
cap total airport noise at 124.9 EPNdB, a level 11 percent below
the noise energy produced in August 1986. The cap would then be
phased down annually, to 124.8 in 1988, 124.6 in 1989, 124.5 in
1990, 124.4 in 1991, and• 124.2 in 1992. This final cap
represents 1984 noise levels, is a reduction of 24 percent in
noise energy from August 1986, and is the level projected for
1992 operations assuming that schedules for introduction of quiet
aircraft currently on order by the airlines at MSP are met.
The major provisions for the ordinance include the following:
- a guaranteed minimum level of noise for any airline currently
serving the airport;
- a set-aside of noise energy for a minimum of three new -
entrant airlines flying three daily B-727-200 flights, and
potentially many more airlines flying quieter aircraft;
- the ability for incumbent airlines to temporarily use noise
energy not being utilized by new -entrant airlines;
- an allocation of the remaining noise to incumbent airlines
based on historical level of service, favoring operators of
quiet aircraft;
- the ability for airlines to buy and sell noise from other
airlines, while maintaining the overall airport cap;
- the exemption of general aviation, federal, and state
operators from the provisions of the ordinance; and
- penalties and sanctions for airlines not in compliance with
the provisions of the ordinance.
NA2. Exempt the quietest Stage 3 aircraft from noise abatement flight
tracks.
This would provide a small benefit to the carriers for
introducing new generation Stage 3 aircraft and could be a factor
in reducing Stage 2 operations with only minor costs in terms of
noise over new areas. Changes in noise would not be large enough
to bring about any revision of the noise contours. This
recommendation was endorsed by MAC in the May 1986 Noise
Abatement Program.
R
NA3. Ne
tiate with the airlines a user fee to be levied on landi
,taae 1 and Stage 2 aircraft, with revenues to be used
noise compatibility programs.
or
A large differential fee on Stage 1 and 2 landings of $860 at
night and up to $430 during the day would result in the
elimination of 98 percent of night and 6 percent of daytime
operations by these categories of aircraft. Major noise
reductions would occur to the southeast and southwest of the
airport, primarily as a result of the virtual elimination of
night operations; minor improvements would be experienced over
South Minneapolis and Highland Park.
At a lesser level of differential, no Stage 2 aircraft would be
eliminated from the fleet, but the differential fee could provide
funding for the corrective :.and use compatibility measures
described below. The noise abatement benefits of the modest
differential fee scale would be insignificant.
The measure is proposed for inclusion in the program, with
accounting procedures and level of differential to be determined
after further study.
NA4. Relocate Runway 4-22 to the south of Runway 11L -29R.
This measure would permit significant increases in use of the
Preferential Runway System (PRS) without the imposition of a slot
allocation system. As a result, about one-third of the
overflights over South Minneapolis would be shifted to less
populated areas south of the airport, yielding good middle -term
noise benefits to this part of the vicinity even without any
restriction on levels of operations. This benefit would occur
because the improved capacity of the 29/22 PRS would permit its
use for a larger part of the day when winds permit. The measure
would have the effect of shifting some noise impacts from the
South Minneapolis area to Richfield and Bloomington off Runway
4-22, an area that experienced significant overflight until the
increase in traffic levels limited PRS utilization. This measure
is currently the subject of an Environmental Assessment analysis.
NA5. Reduce general aviation activities by providing incentives to
relocate at other airports.
There will be a component of general aviation, air taxi service,
and FBO functions that provides essential services at MSP, which
will not and should not move to another airport. The shift of
the non-essential operations would leave small but worthwhile
noise benefits. The increased use of the PRS in the short-term
would decrease overflights over South Minneapolis for the equiva-
lent of one hour on the average day, and increase overflights
southwest of the airport over Bloomington. In 1990, some use of
the PRS would still be possible with this measure in effect.
V
The MAC Noise Abatement Program includes a number of actions
which would implement this measure, including the following:
installation of the ILS at Airlake;
completion as soon as possible of the on-going improvement
program at St. Paul Downtown Airport;
accelerated program of improvements at Anoka and Airlake
airports;
- restricted construction of new corporate and general aviation
.hangars at MSP.
The revised forecasts of air activity (January 1987) assume that
the incentives program, together with a current downward trend in
the -levels of general aviation activity at MSP, will result in a
reduction from 106,700 operations in 1985 to about 75,600
operations in 1992. The noise effects in levels of jet aircraft
use of the PRS is included in calculation of the 1992 Noise
Exposure Map.
The benefits of this measure in its contribution to program
effectiveness would be minor.
NA6. Assign propeller aircraft to Runways 11L -29R and 11R -29L when the
PRS is in use.
The noise benefits would be those associated with use of the
Preferential Runway System, reduced overflights of South
Minneapolis and increased operations to the southwest where the
adverse effects of overflight can be better ameliorated. The
measure is implemented by ATC today when a large number of light
aircraft arrivals is experienced. Maximization of the measure
could extend by a small amount the number of daytime hours that
the preferential runways are currently used. In the long term,
projected increases in traffic will minimize the potential noise
benefits to be derived from this measure, since use of the
preferentials would be all but eliminated during the daytime
hours by the volume of turbojet operations alone.
The measure is a proposed program action. The benefits in terms
of evaluated utilization of the PRS would be minor, but in
conjunction with other similar measures, the aggregate effect
would be significant.
NA7. Negotiate new and binding agreements with the operators for
nighttime use; if this cannot be achieved in six months, regulate
the number of nighttime operations (11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.) to
current levels.
No effects on existing noise levels would result. The value of
the measure would be to ensure that future nighttime noise does
not exceed today's levels.
Q
ado
NA8. Extend the ni httime restricted hours to 11:00 .m. to 8:00 a.m.
on Saturday and Sunday mornings.
If the restriction is made mandatory, the weekend restriction
would remain voluntary. The extension would be applied in two
phases, 11:00 F.m. - 7:00 a.m. on weekends immediately, and 11:00
p.m. - 8:00 a.m. on weekends in 1988. Operations by Stage 3
aircraft in the 6:00 a.m.- 8:00 a.m. time frame would not be
subject to the restriction. The principal noise benefits that
would be accrued would be the reduction in potentially.disruptive
overflights during the late evening and early morning hours on
weekends. Mosc of the benefits would be accrued southeast and
southwest of the airport, where nighttime activity is
concentrated.
NA9. Obtain FAA agreement to implement the Cedar Avenue procedure for
aircraft departing Runway 22.
FAA policy, at the time of preparation of this report, is not to
implement the 1800 departure heading for south and
southeast -bound aircraft departing Runway 22, despite a formal
request from MAC that this procedural turn be instituted as a
standard procedure. This turn is critical to the effectiveness
of the program. It is strongly recommended that this be pursued
with FAA on the basis that use of the Preferential Runway System
(and Runway 22 for departures) would be significantly increased
over current use, if the program is implemented. An
Environmental Assessment of this procedure would be required.
NA10. Tighten up procedures for keeping aircraft departing Runways 11L
and 11R to the "Eagan Corridor."
Eighteen percent of aircraft currently fly outside of the
corridor, most of them to meet ATC safety regulations. Observed
deviation from the established corridor by some aircraft was
apparently not necessary, and stricter compliance by ATC could
reduce such incidents. The improved compliance would apply to
deviation both. to the north and south of the established
corridor.
The measure is to encourage ATC to utilize headings for departure
off Runways 11L and 11R that keep aircraft in the designated
Eagan corridor, except where safety considerations dictate diver-
sions outside of the corridor.
The Noise Exposure Maps utilize the split of traffic observed in
1986 surveys. The change in the noise contours which would
result from improved compliance with the established procedures
would be insignificant, but this does not fully represent the
benefits which would be perceived by residents of the affected
areas. This measure would have a small impact on overall program
effectiveness, but would be important from the perspective of
affected communities.
0
all
NAll. Test use of I-494 corridor for aircraft departing Runway 22.
The noise abatement program includes measures to enhance use of
the PRS, so this measure will become much more important in
handling Runway 22 departures such that noise impacts are
minimized.
The procedure would shift noise impacts from residential areas to
the I-494 commercial corridor. The analysis of mitigating
measures in the Environmental Assessment of the extension of
Runway 4-22 will include detailed evaluation of the benefits from
use of noise abatement departure headings, including use -of the
I=494 corridor. The noise benefits would be significant in terms
of overall program effectiveness. Additional documentation of
the benefits will be identified as analysis of the 4-22 extension
continues.
NA12. Enforce and optimize MAC nighttime -run -UD Dolicy.
Review of sample monitoring records for periods between February
1984 and July 1985 indicates that of 288 run -ups recorded in the
9:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. time frame, sixty-nine occured in the
curfew hours of 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. of these 69, 49 either
started prior to 11:00 p.m. and finished after that hour, or
started prior to 6:00 a.m. extending beyond 6:00 a.m., or
occurred wholly within the hours immediately after the start or
immediately_ before the termination of curfew hours. The balance
occurred at other hours during the night. Enforcement of the
measure would probably remove some of these potentially
disturbing noise incidents from hours when they are most prone to
disturb sleep, though the incidents would not be eliminated, due
to the exemption for "emergencies."
The contribution of the measure in terms of overall program
effectiveness would be very small, amounting to a potential
reduction of 18 seconds of take -off thrust power on the average
night with peak noise levels of 65-75 dBA in nearby residential
areas.
NA13. Improve the monitoring and enforcement of all noise abatement
measures.
The effect probably would be small for individual items, but a
general tightening -up on procedures could provide a noticeable
improvement overall, especially in removing individual noise
inc,idents which are clearly in violation of established
procedures.
The series of small changes is difficult to quantify and cannot
be described in terms of changes in the Ldn contours. The effect
in terms of overall program effectiveness would be more important
with respect to public perception than would be indicated by the
noise contours.
o
The Metropolitan Airports Commission proposed a series of actions
in this area, namely:
- sensitivity sessions with air traffic. controllers;
- sensitivity sessions with pilots;
- letter to the CEOs of airlines;
- formal communication of MAC concerns to ATC;
- increase in MAC noise abatement personnel; and
- installation of off -airport, permanent monitoring system.
NA14. install a Microwave Landing Svstem at MSP.
Microwave Landing Systems (MLS) will ultimately permit pilots to
fly varying glide angles and curved approaches to runway ends.
Chese features, however, will not be available until the mid to
Late 1990s.
By the late 1990s, the variable glide angle feature could provide
some minor noise benefits beyond one or two miles from the
runway. The curved approach capability would only provide
benefits beyond three miles from the runway. This measure would
have only a small impact in terms of overall program
effectiveness.
LAND USE MEASURES
The recommended program of land use management measures consists of two
types of measures. First are the preventive_ land use controls, which will
be exercised within areas defined by the Metropolitan Council's Policy
Contour and consistent with the criteria spelled out in the Aviation
Chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide. The second type of land use
management measure is corrective actions, which are intended to alleviate
noise effects in existing areas of incompatible land use and which will
generally be applied to areas within the 1992 Ldn 65 contour.
Preventive Land Use Measures
The MAC "Noise Abatement Program endorses a Metropolitan Council
policy of encouraging jurisdictions within the MC Policy Contour to enact
plans and land use controls which are consistent with the Metropolitan
Development Guide. The policies would have less direct effect on the more
fully developed areas of Minneapolis, St. Paul, Richfield, and Bloomington,
but would have more effect on communities south and east of the Minnesota
River, which are less developed. Any redevelopment within the area would
be subject to the provisions of the Guidelines. Specific preventive
measures are described below.
73
LUl. Amend local land use plans to bring into conformance with the
Metropolitan Council's noise compatibility guidelines.
In coordination with the Metropolitan Council, local
jurisdictions would review their comprehensive plans to determine
if amendments are required to conform with the Guidelines for
Land Use Compatibility with Aircraft Noise contaiied in the
Metropolitan Development Guide, Aviation Chapter. Implementation
assistance may be available for jurisdictions within the Ldn 65
noise contour.
In terms of overall program effectiveness, this measure is
necessary to apply regulatory actions which will inhibit
non -compatible development.
LU2. Zone for compatible development.
Local jurisdictions would review existing zoning in Airport Noise
Zones to determine consistency with the Guidelines for Land Use
Compatibility with Aircraft Noise. They would rezone for
compatible development if such rezoning is consistent with other
community development factors. Federal grants for implementation
assistance may be available for jurisdictions within the Ldn 65
noise contour.
The proposed action provides an important regulatory mechanism
for preventing future non -compatible uses in the noise zones.
LU3. Application of zoning performance standards.
In coordination with the Metropolitan Council, local jurisdic-
tions would adopt the Model Ordinance for Aircraft Noise
Attenuation developed by the Metropolitan Council. Federal
implementation assistance may be available for jurisdictions
within the Ldn 65 noise contour.
This measure is the principal regulatory means of improving land
use compatibility with aircraft noise.
LU4. Public information program
Under this measure, MAC would develop and distribute
informational materials concerning aircraft noise and Noise
Compatibility Program elements. Materials would be distributed
to land developers, planning agencies, housing authorities, local
offices of FHA/VA, lending institutions, and realtors.
This measure would assist potential new residents in the airport
environs to make informed real estate decisions.
LU5. Building Code revision.
The Metropolitan Council would request modification of the State
Building Code to require specified interior noise level reduction
for new construciton in areas affected by aircraft noise.
The proposed action may be required to implement the Model
Aircraft Noise Attenuation Ordinance.
Corrective Land Use Measures
The following measures addressing existing non -compatible development
are listed in descending order of priority.
LU6. Soundproofing of schools
Recent comments from local residents have indicated an especially
high level of public concern regarding the interruption of
classroom instruction by aircraft overflight. The following two
schools are located in the Ldn 65 contours and should be
soundproofed:
- Winonah Elementary School, Minneapolis, and
- Centennial School, Richfield.
Additional schools within the Metropolitan Council Policy Contour
experience significant classroom disruption due to aircraft
noise. A follow-up school insulation program will be required,
following assessment of the need for further insulation on a
case-by-case basis. Sound insulation for schools outside of the
Ldn 65 contour may not be eligible for federal funding
assistance.
It is recommended that treatment of these schools be conditional
on confirmation by the respective school boards that they will
remain as educational facilities. Following such confirmation,
these schools would be eligible for a noise insulation program
which includes:
- mechanical ventilation,
- double -glazing of outside windows, and
- acoustical wall and ceiling treatment if required.
LU7.- Soundproofing of other public buildings
Other public buildings recommended for soundproofing are those
where a quiet indoor environment is important to their
functioning. Libraries, nursing homes, convalescent homes and
community centers within the Ldn 65 contours are candidates for
noise insulation.
The proposed action does not identify specific structures for
treatment, but recognizes that such treatment may be appropriate
within the overall systems of priorities established for noise
correction activities.
to
a 76
LU8. Soundproofing of homes
A combination of soundproofing of homes and purchase guarantee of
homes would be the primary actions applied in the Ldn 65-75
zones, with homeowners being offered the option of:
- soundproofing,
- purchase assurance, or
- no action.
Individuals who are bothered by aircraft noise, but not to the
extent that they feel the need to leave the neighborhood, will be
offered additional soundproofing at public expense. The sound-
proofing may take the form of general treatment of the whole
structure, or treatment of a "quiet room" at the discretion of
the homeowner, if the type and condition of the building permits.
LU9. Purchase guarantee of homes
Purchase assurance will be selected by those who believe that
aircraft noise levels to which they are subjected are
intolerable, even with additional soundproofing. If they are
unable to dispose of their homes after bona fide efforts to sell,
public purchase or marketing assistance and minimum sales price
assurance will occur. Any acquired property will be soundproofed
(if required) and resold as a residence.
LU10. As a last resort, acquire property developed in incompatible uses
and clear or sell for compatible uses
The measure would involve purchase by MAC of a group of
properties, probably residential, in the Ldn 65-75 zone, with
either:
- clearance and maintenance of the area as a buffer;
- use for other airport purposes; or
- resale, with avigation easements, for commercial,
open -space, or other uses compatible with aircraft noise
levels and adjacent land uses. .
The measure would be applied only at the initiative of the
jurisdiction in which it lies, and presumably only in
neighborhoods where the jurisdictions have established that there
is a reasonable consensus among residents that they prefer to
vacate the area. Redevelopment in a specific compatible use will
be subject to jurisdictional approval.
The Metropolitan Airports Commission will not acquire property on
a "spot" basis except where it is to be subsequently resold as a
residence as part of a program of maintaining the residential
integrity of a neighborhood.
04-1
'Ma
The survey of the neighborhoods proposed for priority action in
the implementation plans will identify if any of these or other
areas are candidates for acquisition.
The proposed noise abatement measures along with projected changes in
air carrier operations are expected to reduce the number of people living
within the Ldn 65 noise zone from an estimated 18,500 to 13,700 by 1992, a
reduction of approximately 26 percent.
The preventive land use measures are expected to reduce the amount of
additional non -compatible land use in the future. It is anticipated that
the measures could prevent development of 450 new dwelling units in noise
zones where this would be non -compatible. The effectiveness of the
measures will depend upon the degree to which these preventive planning
measures are implemented by the local jurisdictions. The corrective land
use measures could improve compatibility for approximately 5,800 dwelling
units.
a
a "7 7
IMPLEMENTATION
The Noise Exposure Maps and the Noise Compatibility Program are to be
submitted to the FAA by MAC. The FAA will first determine whether the NEM
are in compliance with the Part 150 requirements and will then consider the
NCP.
When the airport's FAR Part 150 Program is approved by the FAA, the
applicable program measures will be eligible for federal funding.
-Implementation of the program will require cooperation by several
different agencies and levels of government. The noise abatement measures,
which involve aircraft operations, generally are the responsibility of the
airport operator (MAC), the FAA, and the airlines. Responsibility for the
various land use management measures is shared by MAC, the Metropolitan
Council, local governments, and state agencies.
The table on the following pages summarizes the recommended measures
that make up the MSP Noise Compatibility Program. This table includes the
essential government agencies and the agencies responsible, and it
describes anticipated costs and funding sources.
e
E
m
C,
z
R
v r.
Q =N
N
F
a;
N
z
¢
S
C
N
¢
1.. -+ T
L d
.r
3
N
-
6
W I••. r1
r
>
r x
=�
ti
co
co
d n Ol
01
CZ
wr
T (O
co
T
co
O`
z
=
Y
Y
..0. �""
.•r
.r
I
N
z
°
71 ^!
.ai
I
nn
=
^
>
v a 0)
< 3
V
°
r
Vl
Lna
LnZ
W C
N
C
N
x O
Fc
`^
EO
."
rr
C
�
9
G
�
v
W
+r
r N
y
Y ++
a
a v
S vi
y
O
W*o
>¢>,
Y
d
G
I
�cUc
Y
�
M
_
t cc
u
s
s m
�v
N d
x
mm
G^
... Y
C^^ N
N Q
:rl
c
10 y
r N
N
enO
V
V
•�
y
t r
u o EM
•v G G
J
.. d
r
CEON
¢
y E
w
>
¢
O
Y O [n
Z 9
y
IC
m
O
to
c�
C •: m G
.•°i
r
r
v
r E
y .aOi
Ol d
41 >
y
W
>
c
c -J v
y
_
R
12--2
M
u 47
C
C
CL
e•+
EO EO
N
..
N 1
L
..
L
Ul
A
C
.y .0+.�
E
Ei
ro
b y C
N
••°A—
Ol
O IO
Y
i 0
Y
M E R E m
Oc.
y
.+ r bo
C
°
_>
O y v
V
r
V V G
U C- cn
S
6 ►: c] A
co
L
O
4-1
m
C,
z
R
v r.
Q =N
N
F
a;
N
z
¢
S
C
N
¢
L d
.r
3
N
-
6
r
>
r x
=�
ti
g
of
U
U
y .�
z
=
z
=
=
a
N
z
71 ^!
=
x
>
< 3
V
N
N
G
N
x O
Fc
`^
C4
rr
7
S vi
W*o
>¢>,
°:W
oma'
I
�cUc
yu
t cc
cal
a c
�v
N d
x
mm
G^
... Y
C^^ N
N Q
G
10 y
r N
N
•�
C
•v G G
J
EC r
¢
bl i
•GI
L W
¢
Z 9
••C•
Cal
C •: m G
E
pp Z
e•+
EO EO
N
..
N 1
L
In
ro
N
c] W
CO
G
_>
G I
•p °
Ol v
of '+
L
O
4-1
.
I
I
O.
.+
N
lu
I
.v
Y
�
—oa
E
Oi�: m
c i s
y
h
z mc
.c
•�
_I
-
yw u
I
r Ed
E u u
41
N
G a
'.Z •-
ui
Z r+
cc
6 F
a W¢
°
i
5
.Nal
-I
N
z
zl al
z
z
z
Gi
m
C,
z
R
v r.
Q =N
N
J
a;
z
¢
S
N
L d
y
3
N
-
E �
>
r x
=�
ti
g
of
O
y .�
G
Z 10
y
N
r
71 ^!
=
x
>
< 3
V
x O
Fc
`^
C4
rr
con W W I Z S �•
96 I
N
U
00
c
N
6
I C
Y
C d
1
1
y Y
r0.1
0
O
1
E
M .•-1 3 W
W
y C W
Y Y W
1•T •'E1 C E
N X
VWa Z > ly+
m
C L C V
y
I/I Y O
y
10 W L C
I
•.' O E 6
fW/I
d 3 O
W
W
Z H
Wry-I
07
U
a>.
Va i
w C
Gla u
n
M u 4
yf� W 111
co
O I
C
y
•"
U- .0.: y
U 1
N .�-1 N Wz O •0.1
con W W I Z S �•
96 I
U
C
c
1
1
6
>�
Y
1
1
W L
r0.1
0
O
1
E
bO
C
W
O 0 u
Y Y W
O. I
N X
G O
m
L)
y
�+U L
d
y
�0 y
I
y
fW/I
y
W
W
cc v
Wry-I
ayi
U
10
Va i
O
O y¢
O
N
O I
C
y
•"
M y .n 7
U 1
0
U C O
O1
j
Csa I
u
W .y C
.a
W
6
tq L
�
N
b0 u
h7 O
6 I
•.to
•1>•1 7
J D
••>a
=C6
uU
s
C+] I
C O
v N
I
I
E
w u A
~~
Q
(V
1
0
bQ•Y
0
y
Z
GI
F a
•.yi •O W O
C r.-
O
C u
I
O
O.O
L
I
I
C
•~
E O
'D G w N
C
E y
'O O
1
S
a— ovr
E
a u
i
I
.-I O
O
.--I W bo -0 O
OC
I
1
6.V
GV
�M
VC7
i
V
L
v ?
10.1 01
0
l9
C
r�^I :0
5-03
SU
xcn
5„03
5.]
W3
cq
H I
N
!•1
ems-
ul
6 Z i
^
V
U
C
2.
cn a i
2 V1 1
000
0. W
con W W I Z S �•
96 I
J
Y
N i
c
F
>�
Y
ro
W L
r0.1
0
O
6 j
E
0 W'09
W
O 0 u
Y Y W
O. I
•+
G O
C7
L)
L
G
i
•.+ to
C ✓ 30t~
�0 y
•.0i
w
E U 'Oi U w
L F
V
r
cc v
Wry-I
ayi
o
u W
n
cI
Q
O
ca i
I
1
a
o o ¢E
I
I
I
C
L
a0+ 0
•C
M y .n 7
•.�
I
yUy yto f0 01
w°
j
N
L Oyl
O
m
7
6
tq L
Y Y
O
b0 u
h7 O
Y 0
O 6
ON i
r•I
J D
n
=C6
uU
s
C+] I
C O
v N
I
3 L
_
~~
Q
_d¢y
I
bQ•Y
y C
I
E- U
F a
I
�
Q
Z
ti
Z
J
>
H
a
>�
Y
•> C
W L
r0.1
0
O
n
C
d
W
O 0 u
O.
00
Y C 6. W bO
W = Y 'O
rl u
co
y
C
>
U
C
•.+ to
C ✓ 30t~
aq'
•.0i
w
E U 'Oi U w
10a C'
G W
V
r
0
Wry-I
C w= y
y
,
'y V
6 W
Y
C W W
L4 v
C
C
a
a0+ 0
•C
M y .n 7
•.�
O
•7
yUy yto f0 01
'•' '
E
S N vi E M
O 1Fj
J
a
ca
0
O
C,
O
O
O
n
n
r,
co
V
m
00
co
00
co
0%
N
O,
N
N
p�•1
'�•1
y
y
y
V
r
L
10.1
,
y
V
y
y
y6
y
-C
C
C
C
�+•
L
Y
Y
9
a
>
>
O
m
6
C
C
O
d
.-I
.••1
r•I
u
n
u
s
uU
s
s
G O
�a
c n
3 L
_
~~
Q
_d¢y
_66
o
ri
V E
E
V y
.•-1
�.
y
L
L
y y
y
y
G
Z
J
a
O
O
O
O
O
U
u
u
u
V
C
7
a
M
'•"1
W
O L:
0
L
V
r
L
10.1
,
y
V
y
y
y
•C
y
-C
M
C
C
•C
E
E
Eo
9
a
6
C
C
6
d
n
Y
c s
a
c n
3 L
Q
W
V
o
6 I
V E
E
V y
.•-1
O W>
y
L
L
y y
y
y
u O D
„y >
M >
•n >
0
L
•n G y >
.-I O
O
.--I W bo -0 O
OC
0. C.9
6.V
GV
�M
VC7
V
L
v ?
10.1 01
0
l9
C
r�^I :0
5-03
SU
xcn
5„03
5.]
W3
y
N
!•1
ems-
ul
C
^
V
41C
000
0. W
.00.
y
L
Y
W
C0
a ro• >
'
u
0.0
W+
y
—
.y y
14.0.1
Y
O
..�
ci
V Itl ^7
u u-3
C
V
'S7 ..+ y
u
^' b0—
O W
E r�
S N
e uC
y
U CO r••1
N
y
u u O y
y
y v O
u O
D. y
N
y V1 0 C
y9
W
^ .u.
C•n y�•O
:n 0
y .:y . y
G •n .,y
Y
.0 C. •n u
W = U ra
7 = _.CL
10
.W+
._Oi
O.
~ C 7 7 b0
cr
Y 00 V)
L 00 y 9
W '0 -U
dY
C •Y
C
Y
G
v 0
W
6 L = E
G L O
c
J 0 O 7
U
4 :J
W u .0. :J •n
i U ':••1 0u
A 10
S V O
i i
S VI Na r
J
7
E
C
7
a
,W,1
10
W
O L:
0
E
>
bc
n
Y
Z
Z
S VI
c=4 W
r
W
W W
.. to
6 I
N
1�0 w
^ cr
bo
�I
>
N
!•1
ems-
.0 i y
J
O
�
U
O
v
v�j
u W
cr,m
8�
NN
u E
g
u
I
CD
T
W
m
C00IO
OD
m
m
m
O,
m
C5,
N
T
N
N
.�.1
c�
xco
✓: I
I.
N
N
N
,O
E
O
U a
V)
.y.
C
Y
�....
..Ci u0i
..w G
. eeO
'y Y, O
r••1 C
Itl t
un
> O!
V) m
d
O T O
aa
�
C t;Q
VG
G
au
S
C
06OO
y
ay S
10
N y✓
m
OD'
co s
T
u
CD
m
m
da W
¢y 0
Y
W
4. b0.O O'
[s. 7 W
4. 00 3 N
b dO E
0 T C
O N
C
O
p
O
y
°' °
0.0
C6
a w
a i
apM
no u
.p u 6 O G DO
✓ C N 00 •J 5O
L O N
c
� a
��
O.
a
�+ a
y G
7
•N C
�•'
'+
s •�
3 0
•n Y
S J 3 .0 ,�0i
S 'C b •r"I .�+
$ t 3 G
6
Z 7 U
Q (O
N
d
d
s a
S O.
W >
W •j
>
>
01 b
t0 u
W
u
u U
N
N
N
N
G
OJ N
•.•I
c
W VI
u
C T
N
=
N L
�
W
T
Cm
J
w Y
d L
Ln
O
E .N.1
.•1 T
'� T
,,,�
mow
En y
Ci
.+
CO
O
E
0
spi
tN'1 r 0
O
O Y
0
Z a
VS
N
Z a
V) VT u
N VT U
O
U
N
0 u
u
u W
u N
,V, E
u E
g
u
E
Q E
c
L
u
v
1
V N
c 'o
q >0
a o
is
xu
c�
xco
✓: I
I.
N
N
N
'.tea
Si
E
O
U a
V)
.y.
z
°•
V
�....
..Ci u0i
..w G
. eeO
'y Y, O
r••1 C
Itl t
un
> O!
u In yN
V) m
O
O T O
O>
�
C t;Q
VG
G
au
S
C
06OO
y
ay S
10
N y✓
la7
t
E L W C
H E N
'•' p 10 Y
u
Qq E Vl
da W
¢y 0
Y
W
4. b0.O O'
[s. 7 W
4. 00 3 N
b dO E
0 T C
O N
L01 N O¢
U O•�N
N O Y Y
N Y d W O
y
C 0..0.. •� G
C r+ 6 C
G> O •.r
C G 00
10 ul0
..Ci y
no u
.p u 6 O G DO
✓ C N 00 •J 5O
L O N
�
•.u•I
-0
u 0—
>
0 Oy 4 0
O
7
•N C
0.
0
W
•n Y
S J 3 .0 ,�0i
S 'C b •r"I .�+
$ t 3 G
$ Y
Z 7 U
I
U
1
r-1
p
1
a.
v
1
c
-
✓: I
I.
O
'.tea
Si
p
O N
V)
.y.
z
°•
V
�....
'a
u y
= o
u
V!
-
O ~
N
1 V
V) m
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Three
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
C. Public Improvement Contracts:
Item 1. Contract 87-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington
Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer and Northview Park - Trunk Storm
Sewer) --On May 15, formal bids were received regarding installa-
tion of the above referenced utilities under this contract.
Enclosed on page 2,L3 is a summary tabulation of the bids
received with the comparison of the low bid to the estimate
contained in the feasibility report presented at the public
hearings held on November 18 and December 16 of 1986. The
increased costs associated with the Northview Park trunk storm
sewer (Project 479) relates to the requirement to increase the
size of the storm sewer outlet from Northview Park down to
Patrick Eagan Park to minimize the impact of temporary flooding
on the proposed park improvements by providing a greater outlet
capacity. This design modification was a result of extensive
review with the Park Department and its Commission. All costs
associated with this design change would be the responsibility of
the storm sewer trunk fund.
All bids will be reviewed for their accuracy in extension and
addition and a formal recommendation will be provided by the
Director of Public Works at the meeting on May 19.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 87-5 (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer and
Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) and award the contract to the
lowest responsible bidder and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute all related documents.
=a-
CITY CONTRACT NO. 87-5
LEXINGTON HILLS FIRST ADDITION
SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 478
LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK
(POND JP -29, -JP -34 OUTLET)
TRUNK STORM SEWER
CITY PROJECT NO. 479
EAGAN MINNESOTA
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M. C.D.S.T.
BID DATE: Thursday, May 14, 1987
CONTRACTORS ' TOTAL BASE BID
1.
Norex
$449,420.75
2.
Nodland Associates
463,090.00
3.
Burschville
469,471.20
4.
Northdale Construction
473,229.50
5.
L & G Rehbein
479,960.20
6.
Richard Knutson
487,640.92
7.
F.F. Jedlicki
492,493.50
8.
Orfei
534,607.39
Feasibility Report ............................$382,130.00
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE .......................... 450,000.00
% Under Engineer's Estimate .................. -0.1%
% Over Feasibility Report .................... +17.6%
X 83
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Four
Item 2. Contract 87-10, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Nancy
Circle - Streets) --On April 24, formal bids were received for the
proposed improvements of Nancy Circle cul-de-sac with related
storm sewer facilities. Consideration of award of this contract
was continued to the May 19 meeting to allow the public hearing
for Project 482 to be completed. If the project is approved
under the public hearing portion of the May 19 agenda, it would
be appropriate to award the contract to the lowest responsible
bidder. Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids
received, showing the relationship of the low bidder to the
estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the
December 2, 1986 public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 87-10 (Nancy Circle - Streets and Storm Sewer) and if
Project 482 is approved award the contract to Bituminous Roadways
in the amount of $22,008 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute all related documents.
a84
CITY CONTRACT NO. 87-10
NANCY CIRCLE
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 482
EAGAN MINNESOTA
1. Bituminous Roadways
2. Valley Paving
3. S.M. Hentges
4. Alexander Construction
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
FEASIBILITY REPORT
% UNDER ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
% UNDER FEASIBILITY REPORT
ass
Bid Time: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T.
Bid Date: Thursday, April 16, 1987
$22,008.00
22,665.75
23,553.30
26,029.00
u
25,000.00
25,210.00
-12%
-12.7%
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Five
Item 3. Contract 87-12, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington
Square 6th Addition/Northview Park Road - Streets and Utilities) --
Consideration of contract award was continued from the May 2nd
meeting to allow completion of the state aid approval process.
Recent contact with that office indicates that due. to their
workload, they will not be able to complete their review and
subsequent approval process until after the May 19 meeting. In
order to protect the state aid financing required for this project,
formal consideration of contract award must be delayed until formal
approval is received from MnDOT State Aid. Therefore, this item
should be continued for formal consideration to the June 2 meeting.
Conditions in the specifications require the low bidder to guarantee
his bids through the June 2nd City Council meeting.
Enclosed on page ,;2R7is a tabulation of the bids received.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue consideration to
June 2, 1987, for contract award regarding Contract 87-12 (Lexington
Square 6th Addition/Northview Park Road - Streets and Utilities).
Our File No. 49405
LEXINGTON SQUARE 6th ADDITION
NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD)
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
M.S.A.P. No. 195-118-01
CITY CONTRACT NO. 87-12
CITY PROJECT NO. 485
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M. C.D.S.T.
BID DATE: Fri. Mayl, 1987
CONTRACTORS
1. Richard Knutson
2. Burschville Construction
3. G.L. Contracting
4. Northdale Construction
5. Orfei & Sons
6. Lake Area Utility
7. Widmer Bros.
8. S.J. Louis Construction
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ------------
3470e FEASIBILITY REPORT EST.
% UNDER FEASIBILITY REPORT ESTIMATE
% UNDER ENGINEER'S REPORT ESTIMATE
0-4'7
TOTAL BASE BID
$431,381.20
434,244:95
447,196.72
448,004.70
459,851.22
465,80 9.30
439454.60
506.425.10
$455,000.00
$509,445.00
-17.1%
- 5.2%
i
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Six
Item 4. Contract 87-11, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Greensboro 2nd
Addition - Streets and Utilities) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, May 15,
formal bids were received regarding the installation of streets and
utilities for the second phase development of the Greensboro
Addition which received final plat approval earlier on the agenda.
However, the City has not yet received the appropriate permits
required from all regulatory or permitting agencies as necessary to
allow formal consideration of contract award. Therefore, it is
recommended that formal consideration be continued to June 2.
Enclosed on page c2n is a tabulation of the bids received.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Continue consideration of
contract award to June 2, 1987, for Contract 87-11 (Greensboro 2nd
Addition - Streets and Utilities).
GREENSBORO 2ND ADDITION
' UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
CITY -PROJECT NO. 493, CONTRACT 87-11
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1. GL Contracting
2. NodIand Xssociates
3. Orfei & Sons
4. Burschville Construction
5. Annandale Cont.
._r
6. Ceca Utilities
7. Lake Area Utility
8. Northdale Construction
x
ENGINEER'S EST.IMATE-----------
Feasibility Report
% Bid Under Feasibility Report
% Bid Under Engineer's Estimate
.BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T.
BID DATE: Wednesday, May 13, 1987
A •
$288,883.49
302,132.50
335,568.67
352,366.95
356,151.75
368,946.00
370,511.45
388,226.00
$346,000.00
346,875.00
-16.7%
-16.5%
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Seven
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (continued)
Item 5. Contract 87-8, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for
Bids (1987 Sealcoating)--In accordance with the approved budget for
1987, the Engineering Division has prepared a sealcoating program
necessary for the long-term preservation of our capital investment
in City streets. The Public Works Director will be reviewing the
location fo the streets to sealcoated along with the Engineering
estimate as compared to the approved budget at the meeting on May.
19.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 87-8
(1987 Sealcoating) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening
to be held at 10:30 a.m. on June 12, 1987.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (continued)
Item 6. Contract 85-26, Permit for Extended Working Hours, Wells #8
and #9 --Enclosed on page�a- is a letter from the contractor
requesting authorization from the City to allow well drilling
construction operations to occur beyond the restrictive hours of
7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. as defined by current City ordinance. This
request for additional working hours will allow the contractor to
employ two full shifts in trying to speed up the completion of these
wells so that they can be put into operations. These wells have
encountered significant delays due to unforeseen circumstances
during the well drilling operations. With the continued expansive
growth of the City, the need for these wells are quickly becoming
critical, especially in light of the recent weather conditions.
However, staff has received complaints from a resident in the Surrey
Heights Addition regarding the noise associated with this
construction and the duration of this contract. The consulting
engineer will be able to provide additional information in regard to
this request on the meeting on May 19.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approved/deny a permit for
extended working hours for Contract 85-26 (Wells #8 and #9).
aq�
Be,
May 13, 1987
,.City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
'P.O. Box 21199
Eagan, MN 55121
Attn: Mr. Tom Colbert P.E.
Dear Sir:
RECEIVED
i lie i 7
5115 Industrial Street
Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359
(612) 479-3121
Bergerson-Caswell has worked diligently in an attempt to complete
the Mt. Simon Well for the City of Eagan. We have cooperated with
the City Engineer and Consulting Engineer to overcome many unusual
problems. These problems have caused delays beyond our control.
Bergerson-Caswell is aware that the City would like to have this
project completed as soon as possible to fulfill their water demand.
Therefor Bergerson-Caswell respectfully requests that we be allowed
to drill the Mt. Simon Well using two(2) crews working 3 days per week
at 13 hours per day. Our working hours would be from 7:00 AM until
8:00 PM Monday thru Saturday. We feel that this will facilitate
completion of the well in the most expedient manner.
We thank you very much for your attention to this manner.
Sincerely,
Bergerson-Caswell Inc.
G� 2 "
John W. Henrich
Vice President
cc: Mr. Robert Rosene P.E.
Mr. Richard Foster P.E.
WELL DRILLING AND REPAIRING Q� MP INSTALLATION AND SERVICE
MUNICIPAL - INDUSTRIADOM ESTIC - ANY SIZE - ANY DEPTH
Agenda Information Memo,
May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Eight
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
D. Private Improvement Contracts:
Item 1. Contract 85-S, Final Acceptance (Brittany 8th Addition -
Streets and Utilities) --We have received a request from the
developer of the Brittany 8th Addition for final acceptance of the
street and utilities installed privately. This request was
accompanied by a certification from a consulting engineering firm
that the installation of these public facilities were installed in
accordance with the City approved plans and specifications. All
final verification inspections have been performed by
representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in
order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve the installation of
streets and utilities installed under Contract 85-S (Brittany 8th
Addition) and accept those improvements for perpetual City
maintenance.
Item 2. Contract 85-C, Final Acceptance (Eagan Center 1st Addition
- Streets and Utilities) --We have received a request from the
developer for final acceptance of the streets and utilities instal-
led privately within the Eagan Center lst Addition. This request
was accompanied by a certification from a consulting engineering
firm indicating that these improvements were installed in accordance
with City approved plans and specifications. Final verification
inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public
Works Department and is now being recommended for formal acceptance
of perpetual maintenance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the streets and
utilities installed under Contract 86-C (Eagan Center 1st Addition)
and accept for perpetual maintenance.
aq3