Loading...
05/19/1987 - City Council RegularNote: The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. and discussion of agenda items will commence at that time; however, no official action Will be taken concerning individual items until after the polls close at 8:00 p.m. due to the school board elections. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY BALL MAY 19, 1987 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES P.� III. 6:40 - SET BOND SALE FOR 1987 REFUNDING ISSUES IV. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS pp 2 A. Lone Oak Addition Traffic Study I V. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA Q , 3 A. Personnel Items I S B. Proclamation - National Pause for the Pledge Observance �C. One -Day Consumption & Display License, St. John Neumann Church ID D. Sale of Squad Car and Animal Control Van E. Project 501, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition - Watermain) �jk F. Project 503, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 8th Addition - Streets and Utilities) G. Project 449, Receive Revised Report/Order Public Hearing (Country Club Market - Driveway Improvement) P13 H. Approve Final Plat, Carbone's Addition !s I. Approve Final Plat, Greensboro 2nd Addition P VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS P17 A. Public Hearing for Project 498, Stafford Place, Streets and Utilities 'soB. Public Hearing for the Vacation of Utility Easements, Norwest 2nd Addition �(continued from 5/5/87 City Council meeting) Public Hearing for Project 482, Nancy Circle, Streets Co'c-k. Street Name Change, Town Centre Drive VII. / OLD BUSINESS (0,5A. Approve Plans for Lakeside Park, Contract 87-1, Park Improvements `yr) q B. Variance Consideration for Certain Parking Lot Improvements for Fire Stations 1, 2, and 3 P� -C. Consideration of Ordinance Amendment Regarding the Regulation of Off -Site Temporary Advertising Signs D. Special Permit (dominium Group) for Four, 4' X 81, Two -Directional Signs to be located Near the Intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Cliff Road; the Intersec- tion of Thomas Lake and Cliff Road; Lot 2, Block 1, Knob Hill Professional Park; and the Intersection of Diff ley Road and Thomas Lake Road Q,q s E. Rezoning (Pondview - Molinaro & Associates) of Approximately 30 Acres from A (Agriculture) to PD (Planned Development) to Commercial and Mixed Residential Planned Development Located in Part of the E1/2 of Section 16, Abutting Duckwood Drive to the North and Pilot Knob Road to the East F. Rezoning (R & B Addition - Leroy Rother and Gerald Braun) of 2.08 Acres from R- 4 (Multiple) to CSC (Community Shopping Center) a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, a Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot and a Parking Stall Variance Located N of Crestridge Ln and S of Duckwood Dr, NW1/4 of Sec 15 C 130G. Preliminary Plat (Blue Ridge Addition - L.A. Laukka Development) of Outlots E & F of the Lone Oak Addition into a 9.8 acre lot for an Office/Showroom and Two Outlots Containing 37.25 Acres Located in the SW1/4 of Section 1 Abutting Hwy 55 on the West and Lone Oak Road on the South VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Gambling License for Pull -Tabs at Richard's Food and Liquor, 4185 South Robert Trail, for St. Joseph's Home for Children 157B . 57B. Conditional Use Permit - Q -Petroleum - Conditional Use Permit for Pylon Signage Located in the NW 1/4 of Section 32 West of I -35W in the Rahncliff Addition P. «� C. Lexington Pointe 2nd Addition - Tri -Land Properties - An Amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development, a Rezoning of 57.6 acres from CSC (Com- munity Shopping Center) within the Lexington South P.D. to a P.D.R-1 (Single Family District), a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and'a Preliminary Plat consisting of 169 Lts located NE 1/4 of Sec 26 S of Diff ley & E of Lexington D. Ultra IV Addition - Ultra IV, Inc. - Preliminary Plat for a Restaurant/Bar with 1 Athletic Fields in a LI District located on Tract F, RLS Lot #4 West of Hwy 13 between Blackhawk & Shawnee Roads in the W 1/2 of Section 17 and a Conditional Use Permit for On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Beer Sales, Pylon Sign and Recreational Use C)2> ' in a LI District PQ E. Eagan Royale Addition - Partnership Royale -Rezoning of approximately 46.848 Acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 65 Lots and 1 Outlot Located in the SE 1/4 of Section 31 Abutting a�� Safari Pass on the East and Cedar Avenue on the West p• F. Country Hollow Addition - Progress Engineering, Inc. - Rezoning of Approxi - 11 mately 45.47 Acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a Pre- liminary Plat Consisting of 99 Lots Located in the W1/2 of the SE 1/4 of oQ Section 24 Abutting Diffley Rd on S & E of Dodd a30G. Williams and LaRue Addition II, Preliminary Plat for Five Single -Family Lots on 1.9 Acres, Located NE Corner Lexington/Wescott SW1/4 Sec 14 Lexington & Wescott, SW1/4 of Sec 14 IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS - 41A. Review and Consideration of Two and Five Year Action Plans for the Economic Development Commission P° a53 B. Resolution Concerning the MAC FAR Part 150 Study C. Public Improvement Contracts: PZ 1. Contract 87-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer & Northview Park Trunk Storm Sewer �Z�%q 2. Contract 87-10, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Nancy Cir -Streets) • 2S(o 3. Contract 87-12, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington Sq 6th Addition/ P• n Northview Park Rd, Streets & Utilities) To be Continued to 6/2/87 Meeting Contract 87-11, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Greensboro 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities �•QL 5. Contract 87-8, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (1987 Sealcoating) P,2Otl 6. Contract 87-26, Permit to Extend Working Hours, Wells #8 & #9 D. Private Improvement Contracts: P, aC 3 1. Contract 85-S, Final Acceptance (Brittany 8th Add -Streets & Utilities) 3 2. Contract 85-C, Final Acceptance (Eagan Center 1st Add -Streets & Utilities) %. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 13, 1987 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE MINUTES After approval is given to the May 19, 1987, agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the May 5, 1987, meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: SET BOND ISSUE/1987 REFUNDING ISSUES The Finance Committee met on Thursday, April 30, to review the status of refunding certain bond issues that were recently evaluated by the Director of Finance and the City's fiscal consultant, Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. Since the market has changed and interest rates have increased in the past two to three weeks, it was suggested by the fiscal consultant and concurred by the Finance Committee and City staff that the market be observed until May 19 and a decision be made at that City Council meeting whether to authorize a bond sale for refunding certain issues of record. If the market is favorable, the bond sale would call for a 45 -day window period allowing the fiscal consultant and City to observe the market and finalize the bond sale at a time when interest rates are favorable. Authorization by the City Council at the meeting on May 19 would establish a date to begin the 45 -day period which is assumed to be sometime in mid-June. The two (2) bond issues that have appeared to be feasible are a cross-over issue which involves the refunding of two (2) bond issues that were previously refunded in 1985, and the Water Treatment Plant revenue bond issue of 1983. At the last City Council meeting, the proposed refunding bond issues were discussed and concern was raised regarding the expenses that the City would incur if a bond sale was ordered and the market continued to increase and the refunding sale was never authorized. The City would incur expenses for preparation of the operating statement, legal preparation of all sale documents and other related costs which could range somewhere from $10,000 to $15,000 per issue. There is no way to recover these expenses unless the bonds are refunded at a favorable rate of interest. However, if the City approves the refunding sale and there is a dip in interest rates during the 45 -day period, our City would have an advantage over many other cities in that the sale documents are ready which could pro- vide the city with a favorable refunding issue. It is the opinion of Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., that the rise in the interest rates reflects a brief "bubble" in the economy and that interest rates will be coming down in the next several weeks. Enclosed without page number is a summary report prepared by Miller and Schroeder. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To determine whether a bond sale to consider the refunding of certain bond issues should be approved or disapproved. I Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Two (DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Item 1. Lone Oak Addition Traffic Study/Cray Addition: Cray Research Incorporated is processing a proposed subdivision incorporating approximately 115 acres north of Lone Oak Road and east of Trinity Lone Oak Church in the Lone Oak Subdivision. Their development proposal provides a phased development with an ultimate saturation of approximately 1.2 million square feet incorporating multiple buildings as a part of their expansion operations. In order to provide access for this development, the planned unit development provided for the construction of Lone Oak Drive from the existing Lone Oak Parkway down to Lone Oak Road (Co. Rd. 26). During the staff review of this proposed development, it was recommended that a traffic analysis be performed to identify the impact on County Road 26 (Lone Oak Road) and its signalized intersection with Trunk Hwy. 149/55. Also, analysis would be provided relating to the impact of the existing Lone Oak Parkway and Northwest Parkway intersecting with Trunk Highway 149 just south of I-494. It is felt that this Traffic Impact Analysis Study is necessary to coincide any proposed improvements or upgrading of existing facilities to coincide with the proposed phase development of the overall Cray Addition. In the past, the Council has indicated that the Planning Commission does not have the authority to initiate the traffic studies necessary for staff to provide the information to be evaluated. Therefore, the Public Works Department is requesting Council authorization to proceed with this study so this information can be provided with all other staff reviews to ensure a timely processing of this proposed development. While limited traffic analyses were performed with the EIS and indirect source permit application, it did not address any impact on existing facilities associated with phase development of the Northwest Campus or the proposed Cray Research development proposals in addition to the Blue Ridge Addition currently being processed in any potential future users. Also, these studies were done without any City input or analysis and were done solely by the applicant to fulfill other regulatory agency requirements. The Public Works Department would like direction from the Council as to the depth of review staff should perform in processing this application for formal Council approval with specific conditions. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the Traffic Impact Analysis Study incorporating the proposed Cray development and its impact on adjacent existing facilities. Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Three CONSENT AGENDA There are nine ( 9) items referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council _wishes to discuss any of these items in further detail, the item should be removed from the consent agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. Personnel Items: Item 1. Police Clerk-Typist/Resignation--The City has received a letter of resignation from Connie Jaeger, part-time, clerk -typist/ receptionist in the Police Department. The resignation is effective May 29, 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Connie Jaeger, effective May 29, 1987, and to authorize a replacement for this position. Item 2. City of Eagan Hearing Conservation Program --Cities as employers are required by OSHA regulations to implement and maintain hearing conservation programs which will minimize job-related noise exposure, monitor hearing among employees exposed to excessive noise, and motivate employees to adopt behaviors which conserve their hearing. The City of Eagan has contracted with the City of Bloomington in past years to provide such a hearing conservation program. The City of Bloomington has a fully -staffed and developed program which provides various efficiencies and cost savings to the City of Eagan through being able to use the city of Bloomington's personnel, equipment, and experience. Actions which will be accomplished in the program' include testing the hearing of City of Eagan maintenance employees who are routinely exposed to loud noises for an extended period of time, mechanical analysis of machinery and conditions at the City of Eagan as required, and education of City of Eagan personnel regarding correct actions to take when exposed to noise. The 1987 contract amount for these services is $2,050. These services will be performed by the Bloomington Environmental Health and Public Health Divisions. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an agreement between the cities of Eagan and Bloomington in which Bloomington would provide a hearing conservation program for the City of Eagan during 1987. Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Four A. Personnel Items: (continued) Item 3. Seasonal Park Maintenance Workers --After interviews, the following persons are recommended for hire by Superintendent of Parks V onDeLinde as Seasonal Park Maintenance Workers: Troy Christopherson and Michael Finnegan. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Troy Christopherson and Michael Finnegan as Seasonal Park Mainatenance Workers. J� Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Five PROCLAMATION B. Proclamation - Pause for the Pledge Observance --To commemorate the adoption of our flag, the Congress, by a joint resolution approved August 3, 1949, designated June 14 of each year as Flag Day and requested the President issue an annual proclamation calling for its observance and for the display of the flag of the United States on all government buildings. Congress also requested the President, by joint resolution approved June 9, 1966, to issue annually a proclamation designating the week in which June 14 occurs as National Flag *Week and calling upon all citizens of the United States to display the flag during that week. In 1985 the National Flag Day Foundation Board, through a volunteer effort that started in 1980, organized the "Pause for the Pledge" which is a grassroots compaign to enlist Americans everywhere to join in a pause for the Pledge of Allegiance each year at 7:00 p.m. EDT on Flag Day. Enclosed on page_ is a copy of a proclamation declaring National Flag Day, June 14, 1987, and that all Eagan residents pause at 7:00 p.m. EDT on June 14 to recite the Pledge of Allegiance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge Mayor Blomquist's proclamation of National Flag Day for June 14, 1987. OF 5\ya Flag Iia Information National Flag Day Committee 418 South Broadway Baltimore, Maryland 21231 301 -563 -FLAG SAMPLE PROCLAMATION PROCLAMATION NATIONAL FLAG DAY June 14, 1987 ion Pause For The Pledge of Allegiance WHEREAS, by Act of the Congress of the United States dated June 14, 1777, the.first official flag of the United States was adopted; and WHEREAS, by Act of Congress dated August 3, 1949, June 14 of each year was designated "National Flag Day;" and WHEREAS, the Congress has requested the President to issue annually a proclamation designating the week in which June 14 occurs as National Flag Week; and WHEREAS, on December 8, 1982 the National Flag Day Foundation was chartered to conduct educational programs and to encourage all Americans to PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE of Allegiance as part of National Flag Day ceremonies; and WHEREAS, the President of the United States at the national ceremony held in Baltimore, Maryland on June 14, 1985, led the Pledge of Allegiance; and WHEREAS, the year 1987 will be dedicated to the commemoration of the Bicenten- nial of the United States Constitution; and WHEREAS, Flag Day celebrates our nation's symbol of unity, a democracy in a republic, and stands for our country's devotion to freedom, to the rule of all, and to equal rights for all: NOW, THEREFORE, I (Your Name and Title), do hereby proclaim June 14, 1987 as Flag Day in (Your State) and urge all citizens of (Your State) to pause at 7:00 p.m. EDT on this date for the Eighth annual PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE and recite with all Americans the Pledge of Allegiance to our Flag and Nation. 6 A Program of the National Flag Day Foundation, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland. Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Six ONE DAY CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY LICENSE/ST JOHN NEUMANN C. One Day Consumption and Display License for St. John Neumann Church --The St. John Neumann Parish is requesting a consumption and display one -day license for a church dance that is scheduled on June 6, 1987, at the St. John Neumann Church. The non-profit organization entitled, St. John Neumann Parish, is sponsoring the church dance and the applicant responsible as the manager of the event is J'm Marshall who resides at 1807 Carnelian Lane. Enclosed on pages is a copy of the application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE ITEM: To approve the application for consumption and display as presented by St. John Neumann parish for a June 6, 1987, dance. 7 CITY OF EAGAN &M PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O.Box211W EAGAN, MINNESOTA 65121 CITY OF EAGAN APPLICATION FOR CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY - ONE DAY LICENSE Fee: oo Date Submitted: % Reason For Event: a*)ectvAAlCe ••- . • r •N 5107:g Date of Event: Name of Non -Profit Organization: X - r. %, Op j Plf,-els y A. The following' is to be cottpleted by the duly authorized officer of the organization: rl� 1. TRUE NAME: Last First / Full Middle 2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: 1907 ,c1�Z;it� /-•�F�C� i -,4f,) -Lr Z z Street City State/J Zip 3. DATE OF BIRTH: J/Z `/7 4. PLACE OF BIRTH: Sr /�r4uz iL( � Month/Day/Year City State% ysy-,2 y a I S. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No� If yes, explain.- B. xplain:B. The following is- -to be completed by the designated Chairperson/Manager of the event: 1. TRUE NAME: �'Sf�-�- ��l7rc•E,! eCrd,�c ,.c „J D Last J First Full Middle 2- RESIDENCE ADDRESS: / e �j �',�cIEL ��iJ !� sl.J �� - �SJ 2z StreetCity State Zip 3. DATE OF BIRTH:—c3/2- 4. PLACE OF BIRTH: Mon ay Year City Stat 5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No� If Yes, explain: 6. How long have you been a member of the organization? ORGANIZATION INFORMATION: 1. Address where regular meetings are held: .0 ,30 Street City 2. Day and time of meetings: As- A'IeG l) P,6 3. Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota?. Yes No 7 4. How long has the organization been in existence? 5. How many members in the organization? :9-000rL�eS • g • QAQA 000V TOXq CEAC Consumption & Display Application Page Two ORGANIZATION INFORMATION (continued) 6. What is the purpose of the organization? 124 7. Officers of the Organization: NAME ADDRESS (street/city/zip) TITLE if /� 6 r AS ivI JA- as re c J)Jad 4e 8. Give the names of any other persons paid for services to the organization: NAME ADDRESS (sreet/city/zip) n TITLE C r- /�� N �l '{0 3d 1-151 ay- X� /,' .o1 d 9. In whose custody are organization records kept? _ %� h ,mss NAME: , 1�?-' G C' Ze5 a i S ADDRESS : ate i �L�J O Z z' Street City State Zip. Business Telephone Number: 2.0lftome Telephone Number: THE LICENSEE HEREBY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE CITY OF EAGAN HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR SLITS INCLUDING ATTORNEY FEES AND OTHER DEFENSE COSTS, WHICH THE CITY OF EAGAN MAY INCUR BY REASON OF ANY ACTIVITIES ARISING FROM THE GRANT OF THIS ONSUMPT/ION AND DISPLAY - ONE DAY LICENSE. and I, Name of Event Chairperson/Manager by submit in duplicate this application for a consumption and display - one license in accordane with the Eagan City Code, Chapter 5, Section 5.80, and esota Statutes. w� . % < - Signature - Signature - Chairperson/Manager FOR CITY U NLY POLICE APPROVAL: Yes " No ( ) SIGNED DATEDV 111) CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: Yes ( ) No ( ) SIGNED DATED Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Seven SALE OF OLD SQUAD AND ANIMAL WARDEN VAN D. Sale of Squad Car and Animal Van --The City has received three (3) bids for the sale of Squad #9. Those bidders are: 1) Viking Auto, $1,180; 2) Curt Sisco, $1,200; and 3) Suburban Auto, $2,085. The City has also received one bid for the Animal Warden's vehicle, a 1979 Chevrolet 1 -ton van for $688. The bidder for the Animal Warden van is Viking Auto. It is recommended that the high bid for Suburban Auto in the amount of $2,085 for the sale of Squad #9 and the Viking Auto bid for $688 for the Animal Warden van be approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the high bid for Suburban Auto in the amount of $2,085 for Squad #9 and Viking Auto in the amount of $688 for the Animal Warden van, both pieces of equipment having been declared surplus property. ed Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eight PROJECT 501, RECEIVE REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING E. Project 501, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale Center Center Industrial Park 8th Addition - Watermain)--As a condition of approval of the above referenced subdivision, the developer submitted a petition requesting the installation of watermain facilities to service the newly created lots. This report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to be held on J une 16. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Feasibility Report for Project 501 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 8th Addition - Watermain) and schedule public hearing to be held on June 16, 1987. PROJECT 503, RECEIVE REPORT,/''ORDER PUBLIC HEARING F. Project 503, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 8th Addition - Streets and Utilities) --In response to a petition received from the developers of the proposed Windtree 8th Addition, the Council authorized the preparation of the Feasibility Report for the installation of streets and utilities within the Windtree 8th Addition. This report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Feasibility Report for Project 503 (Windtree 8th Addition - Streets and Utilities) and schedule public hearing to be held on June 16, 1987. PROJECT 449, RECEIVE -REVISED" REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING G. Project 449, Receive "Revised- Report/Order Public Hearing (Country Club Market - Driveway Improvement) --On July 16th, 1985, a public hearing was held to discuss proposed improvements to the private driveway adjacent to Country Club Market. Although written objections were received from Country Club Market at that hearing, Council closed the hearing and authorized the installation of project. Because of the majority of the improvements were proposed to be constructed on private property, continuous negotiations were held to try and proceed with the approved project. Most recently, representatives of Country Club Market indicated that ` they would resist any attempt to proceed with this project due to their feeling that the majority of the improvements were the responsibility of other property owners. /I Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Nine As a result of additional investigation regarding ownership and access for the private drive, the staff prepared a "revised" Feasibility Report to be reconsidered at a new public hearing. This new public hearing is necessary because of proposals to levy assessments against property owners not originally identified in the public hearing process during 1985. This report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration of scheduling a new formal public hearing to be held on June 16, 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Feasibility Report for Project 449 "Revised" (Country Club Boulevard and Driveway Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on June 16, 1987. Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Ten APPROVE FINAL PLAT/CARBONE'S ADDITION H. Approve Final Plat for Carbones' Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Carbone's Addition located north of Yankee Doodle Road and wsst of Unisys and indicated by the final plat map enclosed on page _'t All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval gra ted by Council action on October 21, 1986, have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Carbones Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /3 CARBONES ADDITION r L~ Oak Neal A QC ALlO H ' lt0 I a�tiA AM ROAD to Denote repast O.NII A.N ( set 4 • NM Seo bn 9, Tw;L27, R91.23 11 The South lot — VICINITY MAP I Sou►h.e,t phi e&suotd fo h: M &*cows IN f o ,w is grim w Fier - f d9'I!•06'E 130.00 —r--&--&— DENOTES -Right or A DENOTES •Designaled I - I = r.s. lip p� v + sl in co � I a« —J i A _ Y �� •K 13000 i 2 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD) $ S COUNTY ROAD NO. 28 fI��s�. f 1P _ Ndg'Rlbs'w 13000 — COUNTY I DAKOTA— ROAD H)UHT • OF -WAY MAP NO. s a L COUVTY ROAD NO 28 M.M Lw ee 9' of [ iF of im of .«INF /— — — — — — — — — EXHIBIT -"A7 SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eleven APPROVE FINAL PLAT/GREENSBORO 2ND ADDITION I. Approve Final Plat, Greensboro 2nd Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the 2nd addition of the Greensboro development located north of Wescott Road about a quarter mile east of Lexington Avenue as identified by the plat configuration contained on page. All conditions of the original preliminary plat approved by Council action on February 18, 1986, has been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Greensboro 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. l5 X LU .4. U -.11" 0.1 to] jo, %; .4 L" LLJ Ij IL Ljj cr_ n'6\0Z LLI ................ 20 t iii! I LO Et A If Ilk .4. U -.11" 0.1 to] jo, %; .4 L" LLJ Ij IL Ljj cr_ n'6\0Z LLI ................ 20 t iii! I .4. U -.11" 0.1 to] jo, %; .4 L" LLJ Ij IL Ljj cr_ n'6\0Z LLI ................ 20 LO Et .4. U -.11" 0.1 to] jo, %; .4 L" LLJ Ij IL Ljj cr_ n'6\0Z LLI ................ 20 Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twelve PROJECT 498/STAFFORD PLACE A. Public Hearing for Project 498, Stafford Place - Streets and Utilities --In response to a petition submitted by the developers of the Stafford Place and surrounding properties, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was presented to the Council on April 21 with a formal public hearing. being scheduled for May 19. Enclosed on pages throughis a copy of the feasibility report that was reviewed in detail ith all major developers affected by this proposed project at a special meeting held on Thursday, May 7. Our consulting engineer will be discussing in detail the proposed improvements identified under this project and will be available to answer any questions that may arise during the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 498 (Stafford Place - streets and utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications and acquisition of all easements and rights-of-way through condemnation and/or negotiation as may be necessary. /7 Yj REPORT I STAFFORD PLACE / HIGH SCHOOL SITE (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD & BRADDOCK TRAIL) UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 498 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1987 FILE No. 49417 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA Bonestroo, Rosene, A.nderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers & Architects St. Paul, MN 55113 612-636-4600 April 27, 1987 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Stafford Place/High School Site (Northview Park Road & Braddock Trail) Street and Utility Improvements Project No. 498 - File No. 49417 Dear Mayor and Council: Orin G. Bonestruu. P.E. Ruben W. Rusene, P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, Y.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner, P.E. Jumes C. Olson, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keith A. Gordon, P.E. Thomas E. Noyes. l'.E. Richard W. Faster, Y.E. Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. Marvin L. Suraalu, P.E. Donald C. Burgurdi, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Murk A. Hanson, P.E. TM K. Field. P.E. Micharl T Routmunn, P.E. Robert N. PJiJJrdr. P.E. David O. Luskuiu. P.E. Thomas W'. Hversun, P.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. Willis, P.E. James R. Muland, P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. Keith A. Bachmann. P.f. Murk R. Rolls, Y.E. Robert C. Ruuek, A.I.A. Tharnus E. Angus, P.E. Scott L. Young, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Puwebky Harlan M. Olson Susan M. Eberlin Enclosed is our report for Stafford Place/High School Site, Project No. 498. This report covers utility and street improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer jayider the laws of t/h, Sta a of innesota. Approved by�: PP ./ Department of Public Wks. *lark A. Hanson Date: /-/- �;' ' - Date: April 27, 1987 Reg. No. 14260 3370e lJ� SCOPE: This project. provides for the construction of Northview Park Road and Braddock Trail to serve Stafford Place and the future high school and middle school site. Also included is the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer within the street rights-of-way to serve the abutting proper- ty. Stafford Place includes approximately 180 lots on 80 acres. The future high school and middle school site located west of Stafford Place is included on approximately 95 acres. Northview Park Road and Braddock Trail are designated as neighborhood col- lectors and are designated as Municipal State Aid Streets in the City of Eagan. Therefore, the plans and specifications for street surfacing will be prepared in accordance with Municipal State Aid Standards and will be submit- ted to Mn/DOT for their review and ultimate approval. FEASIBILITY AND RECOM'.4ENDATIONS: The project as outlined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as two contracts. Contract I would include the construction of all utilities and the grading of Northview Park Road west of Braddock Trail. Contract II would include the street surfacing of Northview Park Road and Braddock Trail. The plans and specifications for Contract II will be prepared in accordance with Municipal State Aid Standards and be submitted to the State Aid Office for their review and approval. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes the westerly exten- sion of the proposed trunk sanitary sewer in Northview Park Road to be con- structed under Project 494 serving Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge Additions. The trunk sanitary sewer extension will serve Stafford Place and the unplatted property on the north side of Northview Park Road. The high school and middle Page 1. 3370e vv school site will be served by the existing sanitary sewer located at the north westerly corner of their property. It is also proposed to extend this existing sanitary sewer easterly in Northview Park Road approximately 660'. This sanitary sewer will serve the property north of Northview Park Road and the land approximately 660' east of the Lexington Square Additions. It is assumed the sanitary sewer required in Braddock Trail to serve the abutting residential lots in Stafford Place will be constructed privately. Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a 16" trunk main in Northview Park Road and an 8" water main in Braddock Trail. The 16" main at the westerly end will connect to the proposed 16" main to be constructed in Northview Park Road under Project #485 as part of Lexington Square 6th Addition. At the easterly end the 16" main will connect to proposed 16" main to be constructed ..under Project 491 as part of the Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge Additions. The 8" main in Braddock Trail will connect to the existing 20" trunk main in County Road 30 located on the south side. Also required is the construction of a pressure reducing station on the 8" main which crosses the high and intermediate pressure zone. The location of the pressure reducing station is shown on the drawing located at the back of this report and is intended to maintain the southwesterly portion of Stafford Place and the high school and middle school facility in the high pressure zone. Also included is the required number of valves, hydrants and water stubs for proposed and future connections. Services - Services are proposed to be constructed to the 10 lots in Stafford Place fronting Northview Park Road. Services are proposed to be 4" for sani- tary sewer and 1" for water. It is assumed the services in Braddock Trail will be constructed privately. Page 2. 3370e 4 y Storm Sewer - Storm sewer is separated into four systems as follows: 1.) Braddock Trail Storm sewer proposed in Braddock Trail includes two sep- arate leads shown on the attached drawing. The storm sewer will convey runoff from both the high school/middle school site and Stafford Place. Each storm sewer system will be extended into Stafford Place to be extended privately as part of the required improvements for Stafford Place. 2.) West End Northview Park Road - Storm sewer proposed in the west end of Northview Park Road is shown on the attached drawing. Two detention areas are included in the storm sewer design which each provide approximately 1 acre- feet of storage. The storm sewer system in the west end of Northview Park Road will discharge into Pond JP -20. 3.) East End Northview Park Road - Storm sewer proposed in the east end of Northview Park Road will convey runoff from all of Stafford Place and the northerly side of Northview Park Road east of Braddock Trail. Also included is a storm sewer stub to provide for the future outlet of Pond JP -53. 4.) Pond JP -20 Outlet - The proposed outlet for Pond JP -20 includes a gravity storm sewer extended from the southeasterly side of Pond JP -20 connecting to the proposed storm sewer in Bridle Ridge. It is recommended the outlet be constructed at the time due -to the westerly storm sewer system in Northview Park Road discharging into Pond JP -20. STREET: Street construction proposed herein includes the surfacing of North - view Park Road from the east property line of the Lexington Square Addition to the Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge Additions and Braddock Trail from County Road No. 30 to Northview Park Road. Also included is the grading of Northview Park Road from Braddock Trail to the east line of the Lexington Square 6th Addition. It is assumed the grading for the remaining portion of Northview Park Road and all of Braddock Trail will be done jointly by the developers of Page 3. 3370e �v Stafford Place, Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge. Northview Park Road from Braddock Trail to the Lexington Square 6th Addition is proposed to be 44' wide with parking provided on both sides while the easterly portion will be 36' wide with parking provided only on the south side. An 8' wide bituminous trail is proposed on the south side. Braddock Trail is to be constructed 36' wide (parking provided on east side only) from Northview Park Road to the most southerly entrance to the High School/Middle School site. The remaining section to County Road No. 30 will be constructed 48' wide which will provide for two southerly lanes (left and right turn lane) onto County Road No. 30 and one northerly lane. A parking lane will be provided on the east side. An 8' wide bituminous trail will be provided on the west side along the high school/middle school site outside of the public right-of-way in an easement. EASEMENTS: Easements will be required for the westerly half of Braddock Trail and those portions of Northview Park Road which will not be platted as part of Stafford Place. It is anticipated these easements will be acquired at not cost because the properties are controlled either by developers or the school district. However, condemnation maybe required to acquire the right-of-way for Northview Park Road within Parcel 010-01 which is approximately 1.4 acres including permanent and temporary easements. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AREA E 1/2, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 Parcel 010-02 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 010-04 Parcel 010-75 Parcel 010-76 Parcel 010-77 W 1/2, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-50 Page 4. 3370e COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized as follows: CONTRACT I Sanitary Sewer $ 245,090 Water Main 332,080 Services 12,600 Storm Sewer a. Braddock Trail 40,050 b. West End Northview Park Road 112,590 c. East End Northview Park Road 147,430 d. Pond JP -20 Outlet 17,530 Grading 40,690 TOTAL CONTRACT I ................ $ 948,060 CONTRACT II Northview Park Road (Lexington Square 6th Addition to Braddock Trail) $ 151,850 Northview Park Road (Braddock Trail to Bridle Ridge/ Stone Bridge) 189,590 Braddock Trail (Co.Rd. No. 30 to Northview Park Road) 240,580 TOTAL CONTRACT II ............... $ 582,020 TOTAL CONTRACT I AND II ......... $1,530,080 The total estimated project cost for Contract I and II is $1,530,080 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right-of-way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are es- timated at 259 and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond inter- est. Page 5. 3370e �� ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re— port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. The assessments will be spread over 15 years. The interest rates will be based upon the bond sale issue used to finance this project. SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary sewer proposed herein is considered trunk. There— fore, it is proposed to assess those areas benefiting from the trunk sanitary sewer their related trunk area assessment. In addition, it is proposed to as— sess those lots and parcels abutting the trunk sewer in Northview Park Road the lateral benefit from trunk rate in accordance with the City of Eagan Fee Schedule for 1987. WATER MAIN: Water main in Northview Park Road is considered trunk. There— fore, it is proposed to assess those areas benefiting from the trunk water main their related trunk area assessment. In addition, it is proposed to as— sess the abuting lots and parcels 50% of the lateral benfit from trunk rate per front foot except for those lots in Stafford Place which obtain direct service from the trunk :Hain where it is proposed they be assessed 100% of the lateral benefit from trunk rate per front foot. The school property is con— sidered commercial and will be assessed the full commercial rate. The water main in Braddock Trail will be assessed equally against Stafford Place and the school property, based on 1/2 the total cost of the 8" main in Braddock Trail excluding the pressure reducing station which is considered trunk. SERVICES: Services are proposed to be assessed entirely against the abutting lots they serve. STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is separated into three parts as previously discussed. Each part is further separated into trunk and lateral. 3370e Page 6. Trunk area storm sewer is proposed to be assessed on an area basis in accor- dance with the City of Eagan 1987 Fee Schedule to those parcels shown on the attached drawing. a. Braddock Trail - The storm sewer in Braddock Trail is considered lateral and is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis. Basically, it is pro- posed the cost be shared equally between the high/middle school site and Staf- ford Place. b. West End Northview Park Road - This storm sewer is considered lateral and is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis to the abutting property it serves. c. East End Northview Park Road - This storm sewer is considered trunk and is proposed to be assessed at the lateral equivalent assessment rate in accor- dance with the City..of Eagan Fee Schedule for 1987. d. Pond JP -20 Outlet - This storm sewer is considered trunk and is not pro- posed to be assessed. STREET: It is proposed to assess Northview Park Road and Braddock Trail on a front foot basis based on the calculated assessment rate presented in Appendix C. However, because the unplatted property and specific lots in Stafford Place will not have direct driveway access it is proposed to assess these par- cels 50% the residential equivalent rate presented in Appendix C. Those lots which have direct driveway access in Stafford Place will be assessed the full residential equivalent rate. The school property will be assessed the full cost to construct one-half the street for both Northview Park Road and Brad- dock Trail. The grading of Northview Park Road from Braddock Trail to Lexing- ton Square 6th Addition will be assessed on a front foot basis. The school property will be assessed 75% of one half the total cost of grading due to its 3370e Page 7. public facility zoning while the unplatted property to the north will be as- sessed 50% of one half the total cost of grading due to its proposed residen- tial use. TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates established in 1987 City of Eagan Fee Schedule proposed to be assessed as part of this project are as fol- lows: Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main Trunk Area - Commercial/Public Facility Trunk Area - Residential 100% Lateral Benefit from Trunk - Residential 50% Lateral Benefit from Trunk - Residential 100% Lateral Benefit from Trunk - Commercial/ Public Facility Storm Sewer Trunk Area - Commercial/Public Facility Trunk Area - Residential Equivalent Assessment Rate Page 8. 3370e .;�-, $1,300.00/Ac. $15.06/F.F. $3,170.00/Ac. $1,250.00/Ac. $12.47/F.F. $ 6.24/F.F. $20.55/F.F. $0.079/Sq.ft. $0.053/Sq.ft. $10.30/F.F. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed below: Project Cost Revenue Balance SANITARY SEWER Trunk $245,090 Trunk Area Assessment Lateral Benefit from Trunk $ 12,600 Lateral Assessment $245,090 WATER MAIN $ 12,600 Trunk $233,970 Lateral 98,110 Lateral Assessment 152,640 Trunk Area Assessment Lateral Benefit from Trunk $ 82,030 120,630 $202,660 -$ 42,430 $ 98,110 111,242 79,563 $288,915 -$ 43,165 $ 12,600 $ 12,600 $326,655 201,462 $317,600 $528,117 +$210,517 STREET Street $622,710 Street Assessment $362,406 $622,710 $362,406 -$260,304 TOTAL BALANCE -$135,382 The anticipated project deficit is -$135,382. The deficit for street will be financed in part with Municipal State Aid funds while the deficit for sani- tary sewer and water main will be financed by the major utility funds. Page 9. 3370e $332,080 SERVICES Lateral $ 12,600 Lateral Assessment $ 12,600 STORM SEWER Trunk $164,960 Lateral 152,640 Trunk Area Assessment Lateral Assessment $ 82,030 120,630 $202,660 -$ 42,430 $ 98,110 111,242 79,563 $288,915 -$ 43,165 $ 12,600 $ 12,600 $326,655 201,462 $317,600 $528,117 +$210,517 STREET Street $622,710 Street Assessment $362,406 $622,710 $362,406 -$260,304 TOTAL BALANCE -$135,382 The anticipated project deficit is -$135,382. The deficit for street will be financed in part with Municipal State Aid funds while the deficit for sani- tary sewer and water main will be financed by the major utility funds. Page 9. 3370e PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due w/Real Estate Taxes Page 10. 3370e ' April 21,'87 May 19,'87 June,'87 July, '87 Oct. '87 Spring, '88 May, '89 April 21,'87 May 19,'87 Fall, '87 Spring, '88 Summer,'88 Fall,'88 May,'89 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITE (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD & BRADDOCK TRAIL) UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 498 CONTRACT I A. SANITARY SEWER 1,260 Lin.ft. 10" Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $40.00/lin.ft. 2,710 Lin.ft. 8" Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft. 16 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each 160 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. in pl. @ $70.00/lin.ft. 30 Lin.ft. 8" Outside drop @ $120.00/lin.ft. 10 Each 8"x4" wye in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 100 Lin.ft. 4" riser in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization in pl. @ $10.00/cu.yd. 3,970 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total Construction +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................ Page 11. 3370e $ 50,400 97,560 16,000 11,200 3,600 600 2,400 1,000 3,970 $186,730 9,340 $196,070 49,020 $245,090 B. WATER MAIN 4,010 Lin.ft. 16" Water main in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. $120,300 3,000 Lin.ft. 8" Water main in pl. @ $16.00/lin.ft. 48,000 80 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 8" water main @ $120.00/lin.ft. 9,600 500 Lin.ft. 6" Water main in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft. 7,000 12 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 12,000 3 Each 16" Butterfly valve & box @ $1,200.00/each 3,600 5 Each 8" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $500.00/each 2,500 10 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $350.00/each 3,500 22,810 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.00/Lb. 22,810 1 Each 8" Pressure reducing station @ $10,000.00/each 10,000 2 Each Connect to existing water main @ $500.00/each 1,000 1 Each Wet tap 8" DIP to ex. 20" DIP @ $1,500.00/each 1,500 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 10,200 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. ,10,200 Total Construction $253,010 +5% Contingencies 12,650 $265,660 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 66,420 TOTAL WATER MAIN ................................ $332,080 Page 12. 3370e C. SERVICES 550 Lin.ft. 4" Sanitary sewer service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 3,300 650 Lin.ft. 1" Water service @ $7.00/lin.ft. 18" 4,550 10 Each 1" Curb stop & box @ $80.00/each Lin.ft. 800 10 Each 1" Corporation stop @ $30.00/each 3 300 650 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,700 650 Each Std. Total Construction $ 9,600 6 Each +5% Contingencies CB w/cstg. in pl. @ 480 4,800 800 Lin.ft. $ 10,080 800 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest Total 2,520 $ 30,510 TOTALSERVICES ................................. $ 12,600 D. STORM SEWER a. Braddock Trail 610 Lin.ft. 21" Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 17,080 50 Lin.ft. 18" Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 1,200 140 Lin.ft. 15" Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 3,080 3 Each Std. MH w/cstg. in pl. @ $900.00/lin.ft. 2,700 1 Each Std. CBMH w/cstg. in pl. @ $850.00/each 850 6 Each Std. CB w/cstg. in pl. @ $800.00/each 4,800 800 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 800 Total Construction $ 30,510 +5% Contingencies 1,530 $ 32,040 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 8,010 TOTAL STORM SEWER (Braddock Trail) ............. $ 40,050 Page 13. 3370e � �i b. West End Northview Park Road 560 Lin.ft. 24" Storm sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft. $ 20,160 750 Lin.ft. 18" Storm sewer in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft. 24,000 580 Lin.ft. 15" Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 16,240 7 Each Std. MH w/cstg. in pl. @ $1,600.00/each 11,200 7 Each Std. CB w/cstg. in pl. @ $800.00/each 5,600 1 Each 24" Flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 800 3 Each 15" Flared end w/trash guard @ $600.00/each 1,800 24 Cu.yds. Rip rap in place @ $50.00/cu.yd. 3,090 LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $1,000.00/L.S. 1,000 1,890 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,890 Total Construction $ 85,780 +5% Contingencies 4,290 $ 90,070 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 22,520 TOTAL STORM SEWER (West End Northview Park Rd.) ... $112,590 c. East End Storm Sewer 1,010 Lin.ft. 42" Storm sewer in pl. @ $66.00/lin.ft. $ 66,660 260 Lin.ft. 36" Storm sewer in pl. @ $46.00/lin.ft. 11,960 610 Lin.ft. 15" Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 13,420 6 Each Std. 6' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $2,000.00/each 12,000 8 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 6,400 1,880 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,880 Total Construction $112,320 +5% Contingencies 5,620 $117,940 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 29,490 TOTAL STORM SEWER (East End Storm Sewer) ......... $147,430 Page 14. 3370e i�.� d. Pond JP -20 Outlet 550 Lin. ft. 12" Storm sewer in pl. @ $20.00/lin.ft. $ 11,000 1 Each Control MH w/cstg. @ $1,200.00/each 1,200 1 Each 12" Flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 400 4 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 200 550 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 550 Total Construction $ 13,350 +5y Contingencies 670 $ 14,020 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 3,510 TOTAL STORM SEWER (Pond JP -20 Outlet ............. $ 17,530 e. Street Grading LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $1,000.00/L.S. $ 1,000 12,000 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $2.00/cu.yd. 24,000 2,0.00 Cu.yds. Subgrade excavation @ $3.00/cu.yd. 6,000 Total Construction $ 31,000 +5y Contingencies 1,550 $ 32,550 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 82140 TOTALSTREET GRADING ............................. $ 40,690 Page 15. 3370e 2� CONTRACT II STREET SURFACING A.) NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD (Lexington Square 6th Addition to Braddock Trail) 8,600 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation (street) @ $0.40/sq.yd. $ 3,440 1,820 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation (trail) @ $1.00/sq.yd. 1,820 500 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 1,500 300 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 1,800 5,200 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (street) @ $5.00/ton 26,000 680 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (trail) @ $6.00/ton 4,080 1,400 Ton Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton 15,400 700 Ton Bituminous wear course (street) @ $18.00/ton 12,600 175 Ton Bituminous wear course (trail) @ $18.00/ton 3,150 125 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $160.00/ton 20,000 400 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.00/gal. 400 3,300 Lin.ft. B518 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 16,500 20 Each Adjust utility structure @ $150.00/each 3,000 4.0 Acres Seeding w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac. 6,000 Total Construction $115,690 +5Y Contingencies 5,790 $121,480 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 30,370 TOTAL........................................... $151,850 Page 16. 3370e 3L/ !I B. NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD (Braddock Trail to Eagan Hills Farm) 10,300 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation (street) @ $0.40/sq.yd. $ 4,120 2,700 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation (trail) @ $1.00/sq.yd. 2,700 500 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 1,500 300 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 1,800 6,300 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (street) @ $5.00/ton 31,500 1,000 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (trail) @ $6.00/ton 6,000 1,600 Ton Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton 17,600 800 Ton Bituminous wear course (street) @ $18.00/ton 14,400 260 Ton Bituminous wear course (trail) @ $18.00/ton 4,680 150 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $160.00/ton 24,000 450 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.00/gal. 450 4,740 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 23,700 30 Each Adjust utility structure @ $150.00/each . 4,500 5.0 Acres Seeding w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac. 7,500 Total Construction $144,450 +5Y Contingencies 7,220 $151,670 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 37,920 TOTAL........................................... $189,590 3370e Page 17. U C. BRADDOCK TRAIL (Co'. Rd. 30 to Northview Park Road) 13,300 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation (street) @ $0.40/sq.yd. $ 5,320 3,300 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation (trail) @ $1.00/sq.yd. 3,300 600 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 1,800 400 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 2,400 8,100 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (street) @ $5.00/ton 40,500 1,200 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (trail) @ $6.00/ton 7,200 2,050 Ton Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton 22,550 1,025 Ton Bituminous wear course (street) @ $18.00/ton 18,450 340 Ton Bituminous wear course (trail) @ $18.00/ton 6,120 190 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $160.00/ton 30,400 600 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.00/gal. 600 5,930 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 29,650 30 Each Adjust utility structure @ $150.00/each 4,500 7.0 Acres Seeding w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac. 10,500 Total Construction $183,290 +5% Contingencies 9,170 $192,460 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 48,120 TOTAL........................................... $240,580 Page 18. 3370e 77 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITE (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD & BRADDOCK TRAIL) PROJECT NO. 498 A. SANITARY SEWER a. Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel Description Total E 1/2, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 (Govern. Trust) Parcel 010-03 (Govern. Trust) Parcel 010-03 (School) 390 Parcel 010-04 (Govern. Trust) Parcel 010-04 (School) 14,608 Parcel 010-02 (Sienna) 760 Parcel 010-02 (School) 15.06 Parcel 010-02 (Stafford Place) Parcel 010-75 (Sienna) Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) W 1/2, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-50 Parcel 010-50 (Bridle Ridge) TOTAL b. Trunk Parcel Descri tion SE 1/4, SECTION 23 Stafford Place (010-75) TOTAL Area Acres Assessable Total Footage Rate/F:F. Assessment 740 $15.06(1) $ 11,144 280 15.06 4,217 720 15.06 10,843 390 15.06 5,873 700 15.06 10,542 970 15.06 14,608 230 15.06 3,464 760 15.06 11,446 490 15.06 7,379 490 15.06 7,379 1,960 $15.06 280 15.06 8,010 Assessable Credit Area Rate/Ac. $ 29,518 4,217 $120,630 Total 78.9 Street 20% 63.1 $1,300(1) $ 82,030 $ 82,030 (1) Assessment Rate from "City of Eagan Fee Schedule." Page 19. 3370e , B. WATER MAIN a. Lateral Benefit from Trunk E 1/2, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 (Govern. Assessable 740 Total Parcel Descri2tion 010-03 Footaee Rate/F.F. Assessment NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD Parcel 010-03 (School) W 1/4, SECTION 24 14,796 Parcel 010-04 Parcel 010-50 390 1,960 $ 6.24(1) $ 12,230 Parcel 010-50 (Bridle Ridge) 280 6.24 1,747 E 1/2, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 (Govern. Trust) 740 $ 6.24 $ 4,618 Parcel 010-03 (Govern. Trust) 280 6.24 1,747 Parcel 010-03 (School) 720 20.55(1) 14,796 Parcel 010-04 (Govern. Trust) 390 6.24 2,434 Parcel 010-04 (School) Place) 700 20.55 14,385 Parcel 010-02 (Sienna) Place) 970 6.24 6,053 Parcel 010-02 (School) 230 20.55 4,727 Parcel 010-75 (Sienna) 490 6.24 3,058 Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) 290 6.24 1,810 Parcel 010-02 (Stafford Place) 760 12.47(1) 9,477 Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) 200 12.47 2,494 BRADDOCK TRAIL E 1/2, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-02 (Stafford Place) 150 $17.09(2) $ 2,564 Parcel 010-02 (School) 150 17.09 2,564 Parcel 010-75 (School) 620 17.09 10,596 Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) 670 17.09 11,450 Parcel 010-77 (Stafford Place) 890 17.09 15,210 Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) 1,160 17.09 19,824 Parcel 010-77 (School) 2,100 17.09 35,889 TOTAL 5,740 $177,673 (2) Assessment rate equals 1/2 the cost to construct the 8" water main in Brad- dock Trail. ` Page 20. 3370e _? / b. Trunk Area Area Credit Parcel Description (Ac.) (Ac.) E 1/2, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 31.2 Pond 2.2 Street 20% Parcel 010-02 (Sienna) 34.6 Pond 1.6 Street 20% Parcel 010-02 (Stafford C. SERVICES Parcel Description Stafford Place (010-75, 010-02) D. STORM SEWER a.) Lateral 1.) Braddock Trail E 1/2, SECTION 23 Parcel Description Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) Parcel 010-77 (Stafford Place) Parcel 010-75 (School) Parcel 010-77 (School) No. of Services 10 Assessable Total Area Rate/Ac. Assessment 23.8 $1,250(1) $ 29,750 26.4 1,250 1.9 1,250 0.9 3,170(1) 29.3 1,250 Place) 2.4 Street 20% Parcel 010-02 (School) 1.1 Street 20% Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) 36.6 Street 20% Parcel 010-75 (Sienna) 1.3 Street 20% Parcel 010-75 (School) 2.1 Street 20% C. SERVICES Parcel Description Stafford Place (010-75, 010-02) D. STORM SEWER a.) Lateral 1.) Braddock Trail E 1/2, SECTION 23 Parcel Description Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) Parcel 010-77 (Stafford Place) Parcel 010-75 (School) Parcel 010-77 (School) No. of Services 10 Assessable Total Area Rate/Ac. Assessment 23.8 $1,250(1) $ 29,750 26.4 1,250 1.9 1,250 0.9 3,170(1) 29.3 1,250 1.0 1,250 1.7 3,170 Assessable Footage 1,830 890 620 2,100 5,440 Page 21. 3370e eZA Tv Cost/Service $1,260 Rate/F.F. 7.36 7.36 7.36 33,000 2,375 2,853 36,625 1,250 5,389 $111,242 Total Assessment $ 12,600 Total Assessment $ 13,472 6,552 4,565 15,461 $ 40,050 Parcel Description 2.) West End Northview Park Road E 1/2, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 (Govern. Trust) Parcel 010-03 (Govern. Trust) Parcel 010-03 (School) Parcel 010-04 (Govern. Trust) Parcel 010-04 (School) Parcel 010-02 (Sienna) Parcel 010-02 (School) 3.) East End Northview Park Road E 1/2, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-02 (Stafford Place) Parcel 010-02 (Sienna) Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) Parcel 010-75 (Sienna) W 1/2, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-50 Parcel 010-50 (Bridle Ridge) Assessable Total Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment 740 $34.22 $ 25,324 280 34.22 9,582 720 34.22 24,640 390 34.22 13,347 700 34.22 23,955 230 34.22 7,871 230 34.22 7,871 3,290 $112,590 Page 22. 3370e �V 760 $10.30(1) $ 7,828 760 10.30 7,828 490 10.30 5,047 490 10.30 5,047 1,960 $10.30 $ 20,188 280 10.30 2,884 4,740 $ 48,822 Page 22. 3370e �V b. Trunk Area Street 20% Parcel 010-02 (Stafford Place) Area Credit Assessable Rate/ Total Parcel Description 010-02 Sq.ft. Sn..ft. Area Sq.ft. Assessment E 1/2, SECTION 23 010-75 (Sienna) 56,630 Street 20% Parcel 010-01 (Sienna) 1,672,700 Pond 336,000 1,069,360 $0.053(1) $ 56,676 Street 20% Place) 3,266,120 Parcel 010-02 (Sienna) 1,868,720 Pond 182,950 1,348,620 0.053 71,477 Street 20% Parcel 010-02 (Stafford $326,655 Page 23. 3370e Place) 104,540 Street 20% 83,630 0.053 4,432 Parcel 010-02 (School) 47,920 Street 20% 38,340 0.079(1) 3,029 Parcel 010-75 (Sienna) 56,630 Street 20% 45,300 0.053 2,401 Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) 3,266,120 Street 20% 2,612,890 0.053 138,483 Parcel 010-75 (School) 91,480 Street 20% 73,180 0.079 5,781 Parcel 010-03 (Govern. Trust) 16,400 Street 20% 13,120 0.053 695 Parcel 010-03 (School) 310,300 Street 20% 248,240 0.079 19,610 Parcel 010-04 (Govern. Trust) 31,600 Street 20% 20,220 0.053 1,072 Parcel 010-04 (School) 295,100 Street 20% 236,080 0.079 18,650 Parcel 010-77 (Stafford Place) 76,400 Street 20% 61,120 .0.053 3,239 Parcel 010-76 48,000 Large Lot 203940 0.053 1,110 $326,655 Page 23. 3370e E. STREET Assessable Total Parcel Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD E 1/2, SECTION 23 W 1/2, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-50 = $6.22 (50% 1,960 $11.40 $ 22,344 Parcel Parcel 010-01 (Govern. Trust) 740 $17.62(3) $ 13,039 Parcel 010-03 (Govern. Trust) 280 17.62 4,934 Parcel 010-02 (Stafford Place) 150 $11.40 Parcel 010-03 (School) (School) 720 55.35(4) 39,852 Parcel 010-04 (Govern. Trust) 390 17.62 6,872 Parcel 010-04 (School) 11.40 700 55.35 38,745 Parcel 010-02 (Sienna) 46,761 230 17.62 4,053 Parcel 010-02 (Sienna) 740 11.40 (5) 8,436 Parcel 010-02 (School) 230 55.35 12,731 Parcel 010-02 (Stafford Place) 760 22.81 17,336 Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) 290 22.81 6,615 Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) 200 11.40 2,280 Parcel 010-75 (Sienna) 490 11.40 5,586 W 1/2, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-50 = $6.22 (50% 1,960 $11.40 $ 22,344 Parcel 010-50 (Bridle Ridge) 280 11.40 3,192 (5) Assessment Rate = $11.40 (50% Residential Equivalent Rate). (6) $186,015 BRADDOCK TRAIL 2 - 2,870 F.F.). Parcel 010-02 (Stafford Place) 150 $11.40 $ 1,710 Parcel 010-02 (School) 150 41.91(6) 6,287 Parcel 010-75 (School) 620 41.91 25,984 Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) 670 11.40 7,638 Parcel 010-75 (Stafford Place) 2,050 22.81 46,761 Parcel 010-77 (School 2,100 41.91 88,011 $176,391 (3) Assessment Rate = $6.22 (50% Grading) + $11.40 (50% Residential Equivalent Rate). (4) Assessment Rate = ($151,850 - 2 - 1,650 F.F.) + $9.33 (75% Grading). (5) Assessment Rate = $11.40 (50% Residential Equivalent Rate). (6) Assessment Rate = $240,580 _ 2 - 2,870 F.F.). Page 24. 3370e �� .. In co .r n-+ aO n n co n Go n M •% n a J n `p .. N GO N .O O O O O O O C uN1 M M � n .7 � : O •y O .••• a, a •O M O` N M d M co In J N N O O J M wn Ln N a co N .y Ln Ln ' a a Ln N N M OD Ir � •j V1 n n oD U M u -n a M J M n a n Y1 Go -e J •O N O a u ao u m NN -+ a a CO N O a n M W r+ Go O OO n O M a ^� tiIT w .7 n .4 N N M a co a co N n u O u% ♦D n n in •"I M _ lot ar O �7 V1 N W WN M n P• �t v� u a 1 N N uI M In J a O O V1 W M M M n ✓1 J M N v1 I co Go M a O O a OD w n n J v7 M Go O M. J O W rnn ry (,. ►. C .•� r•+ 'n .+ °° M ra r•, O .+ O ran r .N. e•+ .� a .Nr cn O O H O H O Ger O O O O O O w N O w O H O O '-+ 10 w% N O O a co rr n .r N M a O �O •D O •O •O O M rl J J J J N --' •O a a oo M .1 •O a u a O GG M .--i w% OG .r .••+ J u u n M J M •••� J �r1 N O M u d n .•� n ti X y n n co n Go n M N GO J O N O J O •+ M O O O O C M n In n W% W •o �o' O O O O a 0 a, O a, M +7 rl n O N Ln Ln ' a a Ln N N M OD Ir � •j V1 n n oD U M u -n a M J M n a n Y1 M .•+ N •O N u ayr u yr NN a CO W W W r+ Go O OO n a ^� Ln w .7 n .4 N N M a co a co a n u O Irl N ♦D n n in •"I M _ lot M O �7 V1 N W WN M n P• �t v� u n 7 O •O M In J O 1 O I .•1 M 10 W M .r p 7 n I •O n 1 b n 1 N v1 I v1 A I a D. U a O vs .1 X y a O ant M n n O O O O O O O O O C M M •o �o' O O O O O 0 a, O M a O O •n Ln Ln ' a a Ln a0 O M n N n oD U M O N M •O a a a N Y1 M .•+ N •O N u U u yr NN a CO W W W r+ Go O OO n a .O M w .7 n .4 r -i J M a co a co a -n W% O Irl N ♦D n M 11+ n M N lot M O O •n N W WN M n P• •O d n 7 O •O M N 1 V1 0 P'1 �--� O 1 O I .•1 •••1 n 1 M .r p 7 n I •O n 1 b n 1 N v1 I v1 A I a D. U O O .1 O O •N. W ra p ry (,. ►. C .•� r•+ N .+ .-•� M ra r•, O .+ O ry O .+ w e•+ .� a ,4 u. cn O O H O H O O O O O O O O w N O w O H O O '-+ VO •r1 .•1 > r1 > N> co r4 N N r• N 14 .4 Co .+ W N W N 9* J n M M N J a 0 w O W a 10 a J — n J .1 •O a u a O n a H .a n N OG OG Ln J u u •O M J M •••� J �r1 O O M u d n .•� n N W W W W a O ant M n n O O O O O C O O O O O O 0 a, F F F .0 F ' a a _ M U U u U U .4 •.I a a a N u U u NN a CO W W W a M 11+ n u1 N •n N W WN M n P• •O O O O•O cc ►� F O F 1 O N 1 O F 1 O 1 O I O 1 n I n 1 p 1 n I p 7 n I •O n 1 b n 1 H .1U-+ v1 I v1 A I a D. U O O .1 O O •N. W ra p ry (,. ►. C .•� r•+ N .+ .-•� .•+ ra r•, O .+ O ry O .+ w e•+ .� a ,4 u. cn O H O H O H O O O O O O O O w O w O w O H O O '-+ VO •r1 .•1 > r1 > N> N r4 N N r• N 14 .4 Co .+ W N W N .+ N •'C,4 O 1,• 1+ a 0 a 0 w O a a a a a a a a u a u a u a N a a H .a �G U j u (9 u U u C:J U u u U U u j u U u1 u u) U Nu U u p, W W W W W W W W W W W W W wW s a a E• a O ant M APPENDIX C CALCULATED ASSESSMENT RATE A.) GRADING - Northview Park Road (Lexington Square to Braddock Trail) Total Grading = $40,690 Assessable Footage = 3,270 Rate/F.F. = $12.44 50% Rate/F.F. = $6.22 (Single Family) 75% Rate/F.F. = $9.33 (Public Facility) B.) STREET SURFACING Rate/F.F. a) Residential Equivalent Rate (32' wide street) 2 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $0.40/sq.yd. $ 0.80 0.04 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 0.12 0.03 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 0.18 0.73 Ton Aggregate base Cl. 5, (6" thick) @ $5.00/ton 3.65 0.16 Ton Base course mixture, W-2" thick) 2331 @ $11.00/ton 1.76 0.16 Ton Wear course mixture, (VV thick) @ $12.00/ton 1.92 0.0176 Ton Bituminous mat'l. for mixture @ $160.00/ton 2.82 0.086 Gals. Bituminous mat'l. for tack coat @ $1.00/gal. 0.09 1 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 5.00 0.00069 Acre Restoration @ $1,500.00/Ac. 1.04 3370e $17.38 5% Contingencies 0.87 $18.25 +25% Legal,'Engrng.; Admin. & Bond Interest 4.56 TOTAL........................................... $22.81 Page 26. K 41 ■. Iii �111111�1�� fir► +mss #l��1/ ►� STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITE ®ONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK SANITARY SEWER & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers do Architects CITY PROJECT No. 498 St. Paul, Minnesota Date: 4/87 LFIG. 1 EAGAN; MINNESOTA Comm. 49417 WESCOTT ROAD I6A .l a B"DIP— a D �;I MIDDLE/, GH SCO 010- a SIl'E Ir 1\1 VIII/1�11�� 010-.o L010...1 1 Ex. l "DIP PROPOSED 0, WATER MAIN O oto -S4 PROPOSED PRESSURE REDUCING STATION 24Sa `"•� � �.... ....i -f ; 010-55 011-56 012-58 on -.a BRA DDOC TR. 010-76IFF EY R N Ex. 20" DIPri D ESSMENT LEGEND J "•" �'`" LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK r Nil}IORM TRUNK AREA WATER MAIN STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITE BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK WATER MAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers do Architects ` CITY PROJECT No. 498 St. Paul, Minnesota Date: 4/87 �I^� A EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49417 �7 C WAMI"m 3RTH I W #,i ucr tee# ZK V -N JP -21 I STORM 18' SEWER r:EA6AN 18Y OTHERS MIDDLE/HIGH SQA �L/ ofo r fNi 21' I ■ o1n-xT ;PROPOSED MEAGAN HILLS: FARMS STORK 42° 1 42'f uy:���a� ola••sl, G^"*--�FLITURE STORM JP -53 SEWER C 010-54 OIO-53 'Off -Si 012 -SB IFF - r . • ■IIIA ��: ��11�11 TRAIL ��Ir�►,► - -- ASSESSMENT LEGEND :;;.."'.`"= TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITEN 80NESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK do ASSOCIATES, INC. STORM SEWER Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota CITY PROJECT No. 498 Date: 4/87 F1G. 3 EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49417 � 1►� /IIIIII����� ■ Ola -E0 8' BITUMINOUS TRAILWAY 010-55 1 a1-54 01Q -EI O OHO O 010-54 50 012-W OII-sa 010-76 IFF EY B' BITUMINOUS R AD N TRAILWAY ASSESSMENT LEGEND — — STREET 81 TRAILWAY STAFFORD PLACE/HIGH SCHOOL SITE BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK do ASSOCIATES. INC. STREETS Engineers & Architects St. Paul. Minnesota PROJECT No. 498 Date: 4/87 FIG. " EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49417 Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENTS/NORWEST 2ND ADDITION B. Public Hearing for the Vacation of Utility Easements, Norwest 2nd Addition (Continued from May 5, 1987, City Council Meeting) --On April 7, the Council received a petition requesting the vacation of a utility easement identified by the map enclosed on page_. The public hearing was then scheduled to be held on May 19. All notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections to this proposed vacation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of utility easement over Norwest 2nd Addition as described. �d ------------- P .. .... % ...... I lli7vel 100 4, t .' 0 1.0 a c / - ----- 0 117.71 ;.9 4 -N.0622 21. 23 K Aa t" ul X O -W R fa NI o Qb 0 ------- 120.00 "MO922101W LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE VACATED IN LOT 1,. BLOCK 1, NORWEST -2ND ADDITION, DAKOTA COUNTY, -.MINNESOTA. The existing public utility and drainage easement over the 'e'of Lot 1, Block 1', west 29-00 feet of the east 81-00 feet NORWEST 2ND ADDITION, as platted and recorded, Dakota County, Minnesota. . ;`:\�.,5 :,\�\ W__ -„�' �' /1^�&aim/ /1 J/�//•//.n/�/i!`rl /�O Y 46G (COUNTY STATE A.10 HIGHWAY INO- 31) 0 T K N.. 0 8 R 0 A D I-N.0022123,W. -W Waier mala II W- W al rCo#ch basirt w-898.75 -7 - I foskcaum-rr STATE -90AID -"J416I1W4Y Ha 3)) t! rr 98 "as.s 1 Al. to PILOT —4 IMP ROAD tptq, th-e 11 ;k' is , T.p 9mas . . M. 834.95 q: d-. W* ------------- P .. .... % ...... I lli7vel 100 4, t .' 0 1.0 a c / - ----- 0 117.71 ;.9 4 -N.0622 21. 23 K Aa t" ul X O -W R fa NI o Qb 0 ------- 120.00 "MO922101W LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE VACATED IN LOT 1,. BLOCK 1, NORWEST -2ND ADDITION, DAKOTA COUNTY, -.MINNESOTA. The existing public utility and drainage easement over the 'e'of Lot 1, Block 1', west 29-00 feet of the east 81-00 feet NORWEST 2ND ADDITION, as platted and recorded, Dakota County, Minnesota. . ;`:\�.,5 :,\�\ W__ -„�' �' /1^�&aim/ /1 J/�//•//.n/�/i!`rl /�O Y 46G Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen PROJECT 482/NANCY CIRCLE C. Public Hearing for Project 482, Nancy Circle - Streets --On December 2, 1986, a public hearing was held to discuss the improvement of Nancy Circle cul-de-sac and the installation of a related storm sewer facility. At that hearing, representatives of the neighborhood indicated that the estimated cost contained in the feasibility report was not acceptable. Subsequently, the Council continued the public hearing until such time that more refined cost estimates could be obtained through a competitive bid process based on final detailed plans and specifications. Enclosed on page JrJ is a letter that was sent to the property owners informing of this continued public hearing with the revised cost estimate based on th formal bice opening held on April 24. Also enclosed on pages A14 A is a copy of the original feasibility report for th Council's information and review during this continued public hearing. Our consulting engineer will be available to discuss the project in detail and answer any additional questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 482 (Nancy Circle - streets and storm sewer). S'y _ � S 4 - IIIA � 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 May 7, 1987 Re: Project 482, Nancy Circle Street Improvements NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - MAY 19, 1987, 7:00 P.M. Dear Property Owner: BEA BLOMQUIS1' Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VAC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk On December 2, 1986, a public hearing was held before the City Council to consider street improvements to Nancy Circle incorporating concrete curb and gutter, additional gravel base with bituminous surfacing and storm sewer facilities to handle the drainage as identified by the enclosed drawing. At that time a representative for the area expressed concerns regarding the estimated cost of $5,462 per lot for these improvements. Based on those reservations, the Council continued consideration of authorizing the project until firm competitive bids could be received from various contractors. As a result of a competitive bid opening based on detailed construction design quantities, this "estimated" cost has been reduced to $4,606 per lot. The low bid was submitted by the contractor who is presently performing the reconstruc- tion of Nicols Road in front of your subdivision. Subsequently, it is doubtful that the upgrading of Nancy Circle would ever be able to be performed any cheaper in the future than through this proposal. Therefore, this letter is to inform you that these proposed improvements will be formally discussed at the continued public hearing by the City Council on May 19, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The Council would like to hear every property owner's position regarding these revised estimated con- struction costs before making their decision to proceed or cancel this proposed project. If for some reason you are =unable to attend this continued public hearing, it is requested that your written comments be received at City Hall no later than Friday, May 15, 1987, so that they can be forwarded to the Council for their review and consideration prior to the May 19 meeting. If you have any additional or specific questions regarding this project that you would like to have answered prior to the May 19 meeting, please feel free to contact Mark Hanson, who prepared the feasibility report and design drawings at 636-4600, or myself at 454-8100. Sincerely, I'a "111V omas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj Enclosure THE LONE OAK TREE_ THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY REPORT FOR NANCY CIRCLE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 482 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49402 BONES'TROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSODIATE$, INC.. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS. ST. PA.UL.. MINNESOTA.' Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. G/eanR. Cook, P.E. - Robert W. Rower. P.E. Keith A. Gordon, P.E. ... . Jwrph C. Anderlik, Y.E. Thom" E. Noyes, P.F. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard W. Fasirr, P.E. 2335 W. Trunk Highway wa 36 9 Y Engineers & Architects Richard E. Turner. P.E. James C. Olson, P.E. Robert G. Sehunichr, P.E. Marvin L. Sarvale, P.E. St. Paul, MN 55113 Donald C. Bursardr, P.E. 612.638.4600 Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Fkld, P.E. Michael T. Routmann, P.£.' Robert R. Pfefferk, P.E. . October 22, 1986 David O. Laskura, P.E. Thomas W. Peterson. Y.E.. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Kann L. Willis, P.E. Honorable Mayor and Council James R. Maland. P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson. P.E. City of Eagan Keith A. Bachmann, P.E. 3830 Pilot Knob Road Mark R. Rolls, P.£. •- Robert C Russek, A.LA. Eagan, MN 55122 ThimusE.Anitus.P.F. - Sms L. younr. P.E. Charks A. Erickson Re: Nancy Circle Lea M. Pawrlsky Street Improvements Harlan M. Olson Susan M.Ebedin Project No. 482 Our File No. 49402 Dear Mayor and Council: Enclosed is our report for Nancy Circle, Project No. 482. This report" covers street improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, B05STR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that .._ I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer, under the laws of th State of Minnesota.: L Mark A. Hanson Date: October 22, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 .. Approved by: { { o epartment of Public Works Date :,/,r -L 0117e 30 Year SCOPt: This project proviaes.for street improvement of Nancy Circle.east of Nichols .Road within Tousignant's First Addition. The proposed improvement would include upgrading Nancy Circle to City of Eagan residential street stan- dards with concrete curb and gutter and bitu:ainous paving. Nancy Circle is abutted by six single family, platted parcels. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible -from an engineering krl-, standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plan for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Nancy Circle is an existing 26' wide gravel .street ending in an approximate 35' radius cul-de-sac. Water main and sanitary sewer for Nancy Circle were installed under the 1971,.City Improvement Project No. 64. In 1979 storm sewer was installed east of Tousignant's First Addition with a' catch basin manhole located as indicated on Figure 1. For this project, it porposed to upgrade Nancy Circle to a 28' wide bi- tuminous street and 40' radius bituminous cul-de-sac with concrete curb and gutter. In addition, it is proposed. to construct a catch basin and storm - :r c;�tc: _ 7 sewer line from the east end of the cul-de-sac to the existing catch basin manhole. It .is assumed, for purposes of this report, that the existing aggregate base is .not of sufficient depth and cross -section -to be fully utilized in the a.. - til upgrading of! the street. Minor excavation of the street will be required to -d bring it to proper elevation and cross section. Therefore, we have estimated installation of an additional 4+ inches of aggregate base along with a minor. amount of common excavation required for curb installation. However,:: as part:.. .of the preparation of' the plans 'and specifications, a more detailed analysis. will be accomplished to better evaluate the depth and cross section of the ex- isting aggregate base.to determine the amount of additiona base required. ` Page 1. 0117e / '• it Y' , EASEMENTS: A 10' storm sewer easement along with a temporary construction easement will be required over either lot 3 or 4 depending on where the storm sewer is located. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Assessment and Construction Area Lots 1-6, Block 1, Tousignant's First Addition COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $32,770 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but no easement acquisition costs. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final costs. The assessments will be spread over a period of 15 years. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. It is proposed to assess the project costs equally on a per lot basis to all lots within Tousignant's First Addition. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are esti- mated to be as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Street Assessment $32,770 $32,770 TOTAL ................ $33,770 $32,770 - 0 - All costs for this project are proposed to be assessed; therefore, there are no funds required from the major street fund. Page 2. 0117e PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report November 6, 1986 Public Hearing December 2, 1986 Approve Plans and Specifications Winter, 1987 Open Bids/Award Contract Spring, 1987 Construction Completion Summer, 1987 Final Assessment Hearing September, 1987 First Payment -Due with Real Estates Taxes May, 1988 Page 3. 0117e �� APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE NANCY CIRCLE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 482 LUMP SUM Clear & Grub @ L.S. $ 200 150 Cu.yds. Common Excavation,@ $5.00/cu.yd. 750 50 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $5.00/cu.yds. 250 1 Each Catch basin @ $900.00/each 900 80 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm Sewer @ $35.00/lin.ft. 2,800 1 Each Cut -in to existing CBMH @ $300.00/each 300 300 Ton Class 5 Aggregate Base (streets) @ $7.00/ton 2,100 50 Ton Class 5 Aggregate Base (driveways) @ $10.00/ton 500 90 Ton 2331 Bituminous Base Course @ $13.50/ton 1,215 90 Ton 2341 Bituminous Wear Course @ $14.50/ton 1,305 11 Ton Bituminous Material for Mixture @ $180.00/ton 1,980 50 Gals. Bituminous Material for Tack Coat @ $1.50/gal. 75 550 Lin.ft. B618 Concrete Curb & Gutter @ $6.00/lin.ft. 3,300 130 Sq.yds. 6" Concrete Driveway @ $30.00/sq.yd. 3,900 130 Sq.yds. 2" Bituminous Driveway @ $12.00/sq.yd. 1,560 1 Each Adjust G.V. Box @ $75.00/each 75 1,400 Sq.yds. Sod w/topsoil @ $2.00/sq.yd. 2,800 TOTAL $24,010 +5% Contingencies 1,200 $25,210 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 1 7,560 TOTAL............................................. $32,770 Page 4. 0117e . 14; Total ` Parcel Description No. Lots Rate/Lot Assessments ..Tousignant's First Addition Lots 1-6, Block 1 .6 $5,462 $32,770: r • f ' 4 • Y}'i^5v k�jSK �f • Y t, 1 b _ • _ •° Lis • ,Y Page 5. 0117e r^ t 2: 5" t z TCUSIGNANT'S ISt ADD. NANCY CIRCLE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No. 482 EAGAN, MINNESOTA J BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ; Engineers do Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: Oct. 86 Comm. 49402 Fig• NO. l� ..• •tis ��. 2 3 r'=100' I PROPOSED STOR SEWER I A r --EXISTING I I NANCY CIRCLE I 42' STORM I SEWER i i off, �r t i A I 1 I PROPOSE STREET IM ROVEMENT I 8618 CONCRETE CURB S GUTTER I 30' BACK 10 BACK 6 5 4 z w .. z TCUSIGNANT'S ISt ADD. NANCY CIRCLE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No. 482 EAGAN, MINNESOTA J BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ; Engineers do Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: Oct. 86 Comm. 49402 Fig• NO. Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen STREET NAME CHANGE/TOWN CENTRE DRIVE D. Street Name Change, Town Centre Drive --The City Engineering Division has received numerous complaints from Public Works Maintenance, Building Inspection, and Police Department personnel regarding the confusion associated with the street name designation within the Town Centre 100 subdivision. Subsequently, it is recommended that the Council give serious consideration to renaming the portion of present Town Centre Drive as identified by the map enclosed on page6.�3 to one of several names recom ended for consideration by the Letter of Notice enclosed on page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve changing the name of a portion of Town Centre Drive to an acceptable alternate. W o T/ ICROSSRO �aoti O J Y :j - ilvrxvvmi r 1. 4 - FOREST RIDGE T j 5 - IRONWOOD LN. 67',REDWOOD PT. YANKEE DOODLE Co. Rd. O'LEA R Y P, go w Q 0 z x Lu J 81 iF) BLUE JAY* rWAY i� CT LICK] CIR. I_ )LSTAD vR�y�N LA. )LAA DE141ZARK :1,�AFr-W,,,)C T E . n 0 0 3 M 0 co c LANE JAY W kY�'V ALcON W Q c 3 � r Q CP 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH MC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members May 11, 1987 THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Re: Street Name Change - Town Centre Drive On May 19, 1987, the Eagan City Council will hold a public hearing to consider changing the name of portions of Town Centre Drive. Names for consideration are as follows: Vernon Place Martin Drive Town Centre East Town Centre West Metro Drive Commercial Park Drive Crossroad Boulevard Town Centre Place Input from the public will be heard at 7:00 p.m. in regard to the above. Any interested individuals who have concerns relating to this item are urged to attend. Sincerely, V'clhi'aqel P. oe schstant City En4L gineer MJF/jj Enclosure cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner Arnie Erhart, Street Supervisor Pat Geagan, Administrative Captain Doug Reid, Chief Building Official Sue Sheridan, Utility Billing Clerk Deanna Kivi, Special Assessment Clerk Ken Southern, Fire Chief Joe Connolly, Utility Supervisor �i THE LONE OAK TREE. .THE SYMBOL OF S RENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen PROPOSED LAKESIDE PARK IMPROVEMENTS A. Approve Plans for Lakeside Park, Contract 87-1, Park Improvements --At the April 21, 1987 City Council meeting, several residents from the Lakeside Estates neighborhood appeared under visitors to be heard and presented concerns regarding the proposed park improvements to Lakeside Park. After hearing discussion by the residents, it was determined by the City Council that a hearing should be held before the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission to determine whether residents representing the Lakeside Park neighborhood desire the proposed improvements or the park left as a passive parkland. The City Administrator sent a notice to approximately (80) property owners residing in both Lakeside Estates and South Oaks Additions, notifying those residents of the May 7 APRC meeting. A copy of the notice is enclosed on page -66-- At the APRC meeting the City Administrator presented background information on the action that transpired at the April 21 City Council meeting, the status of the project and a history of the park planning process that developed the master plan and also proposed improvements to Lakeside Park. The Director of Parks and Recreation followed a 15-20 minute presentation by the City Administrator by explaining the concept of a neighborhood park and also more specifically the proposed improvements for Lakeside Park. There were a number of residents present and after expressing opinions, concerns, objections and support, the APRC is again proposing that Lakeside Park be approved according to the Park Master Plan with one modification that the backstop for the proposed neighborhood ball diamond be reduced in size to more clearly reflect use by children. Enclosed on pages (p % through %3 is a copy of a letter that was submitted by D ug and Lind�Dahl, a letter from Carleton Peterson and a petition signed by.approximately 60 persons residing in the area. The petition signed by the 60 + residents is in support of the proposed improvements. It was explained to the residents present at the APRC meeting that the public hearing was to be held that evening and that the recommendations of the APRC would be considered by the City Council at the May 19 meeting. The residents were told at the APRC meeting that it would be advantageous for the neighborhood to have a spokesperson both representing the opposition and support if they wish to comment at the City Council meeting of May 19. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the plans as approved and recommended by the APRC for Lakeside Park_ and defined as Contract 87-1. 6� April 24, 1987 Dear Property Owners Residing in the Lakeside Estates and South Oaks Additions: In official action that was taken at a regular City Council meeting held on Tuesday, April 21, 1987, the proposed parkland improvements for Lakeside Estates Park, located on Atlantic Hills Drive, was directed back to the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission to allow reconsideration of development plans. The next regular meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is Thursday, May 7, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. The location is the City Council chambers of the Eagan Municipal Center Building. A presentation will be made by a member of the City staff that outlines the proposed parkland improvements. Following the staff presentation, the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission will entertain public comment from residents located within the Lakesides Estates parkland neighborhood which includes both the Lakeside Estates and South Oaks Additions. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and recommendation to the Eagan City Council the future development status of the Lakeside Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/jeh will make.a findings that will determine Estates Park. "Yq _ a t x- terra ! ,rte ��'ev a,-_, 64,- �c-�-,u,,.c� a.� ��,c�lc./ (i�Gc.,e,� � Ga-�.cc,!✓ G�.c.�- 7�'�` .4-/- A�Lv- .3, y��P c� a' �,,�� � cam►^-�.�. y�:� �r✓ ✓Z�� Lc�-vii/ f�/ !%�•fi-Cc- j�c. cam- .Q- LAzz �,�;e�-rte- �• �z.�..��. ,/� � a��..� �.--�-�� c�-� .lam .,.�.� �-c•e �-� .,� c�.�e-f�.�� .mac-�.� ��,c..Fi �...� c� 67 `7�-►c..L a� JQ�fcy�,c.� �cZ,Ce,GZu� - a..,.u11 Gt. Gu-su��...� d�iL�C��G ..0.d I 1, '�_' _ , . . .1 A II !tA W."113 'ePlf �4 W Eagan,PJAM 11 -;'.J'', Lpril,. IM4 it i MOI "I V m Hedges t I'AN MIA Mr. To' "H 1 V P W "g ges,i, MI LIP. 40 31 'N R r t pq;z�✓-Z v, Tom .1, All' J�M PIA0 h M A� t 0 lowing Up t 'd u WY Y"ITMIIZ!� Vt p that -'d Ogee.hav j�t�n� t e r us I -�`lhav tar r I camb."to. .start In Eagan t,:_YoU,L, ,estopped ' by"', --s eve ra.L,;,- ,are so' busy that,.j!,drb idon't P71ns"�' oda s` we A M 4,kir Ak n J�p4i "'i V aga 1� with you.,,: ,,One -`bf."th6se'�d, ,work--�I ao will I :,.hope a -,izo'.Eaga"$ _,V611iad 'the'' go"" o.,-Iunch h 4 Aq ! Vil 10, ZAY ,When ;we, moved Mast Y) od f or �'une 0 n .%,-LcL " July] ; ui lg� on a b " understand S tan bi 'idin Lakeside e lot "In La esi p Estates A �!!Ii " . L " Contemplating ',1, - " beautiful" 11 ", ontemp ating'developing'�Lakeslde Park ,,khIch"i "' ne' a ­r! ,our OM6L "To that ss' t 6 1 a discussion 1',.woul&:LI:ike�. tb"' aii my -� ;two cents. espe j6 fi,;:. add' my 7, :for :Thu�rsday �:evening) Ah P, `be`a�.A e-meeting��66h �since cannot scheduled A&. strategy o `E 'r deliberate. agan egar JjgLparks has impressed me k?", ',OoThat-As i-noney;Was AniiI a Ily , spen 't o" purchase many"Jclmos t"Yexcess ' land and'th6nt " ''deve'lop ol sIowlybut :'"surely.VB6b ""A dFexguson at as ng., me';about a m,,personally. pleasedthat ",Z&kes ide � is 0 your ;agenda i �,f mprovements '3Y�Al though ' ­'J"mpr' ' " 'i Iessive now, ".. t :,has .,even,.grpaip'r ,p; -!";'think., most. days'--:' Vo 6 u ora 'walk , , ''In t and ff I a 6 '-at" home ..Co.�.suggest Aha •ok 'out on i-`w6uidl Ike - - . , � ., j �.., � ."I.- t would 1� .1 -, 11­1�1, %,... la'n submitted as"".',"a''n"a'lternc-itl�7"'b; h ",kea Ae,ig..bors'� Ist nc";.I its,'and, : 1,vy I :�j u , merits ,hope'.- pl' 7 aving, tour Tl-child�re'�n"'�',"�'I'two ,of 1 71 .whom ­are,,:rezk .y., n o,,t,spor a 1.�base ore -pass We, ,plan is,, t z,,now;' h'i n g t n�;two ,;weeks L'Ait.i4il'l.',�i�,hAiqg'e,,to.,�soccer.:',,�4Tnen ",­'rA`,,Ic'irg a'kea'�!� other.�'AhAn"-It",, 00,t_ 611 6. V a a" b 1 e'.iurn ';'*. t`� -6` ' ' , ' 'a"I 1;,� � - - ' - 'f J' 0 ,-th'ds6. options� wills,rea, 1yse rve" us although Yfhe '"IdP'"' ,apcording"..' N ­list along with 9,roppings e -paths 'and the hard court . I r di 1. , as'k-ei" i h `t',` h' quar4pi}y,etc.really�has,mer slbe•yond'a one,:,spor p an A ee ..,,so ny. trees .nice,:�.and :'.hatdr 1be t' 'sca'rred "'TJ, a _ au v �. t e n t 1 a 2g in g hay.' 'my, ri.g. N t y has P. 0,4 hi hkthe ill;i,is Ah :ome -�,rall Y ),p'.'J' s'') sentl le A`- W, 1 -my 'I'Mough . .; 1t.I�"f'­l0 ,;true '. t"ha"t"eVen"'u"nde"isI-z- a' 1. o tbaAl I ac,i Ir6bably:getused"byAdults because "ofthe deaith"""t.„playing f 2 upport the alternative because., -best does what par 11 k e "a •, y. re meant lAo'd serves t he' most .1 Y . __ ""IRTi, OU lendi 44.4 Carleton {D �r<Pe J, 1 `C,�o�venant Deyelo t,.suppor ,would ,.be_.,`aat ' ' r '' '' ' ppecl Sir I a 4, el We, the undersigned, hereby agree with the prepozed improvements to Iakeside Park including a blacktop play area, more playground equipment, a blacktop trail through the park, picnic tables, benches, and a backstop for -playin- ball. UY-7 \DA �►� 6/8- Erie Coc-A14 % 70 } L ` 0., �... t'Y.:�,."%u ;.v.., r np,,.. Vii`.. 9..,.'%}5. +; ♦�t�K-,a' ..-0F�d++a'tf. 1'EG _A.'•1.4.,+Y:. r- '�. nt+. tG.z.:x"�� ..,.-'St_. x. y t ,:,-.•�si'1�`Y'' 7 �x ice"' Z r•'�'s #z;f fti e. 1 r e, the uridert�i®ned, hereby a, ee with tke proposed W rr �; imnrovementz to Lakeside park includin- a blacktop play area, .ore 'playgxsund equipment, a blacktep trail ' ! �` .L � k4 r .Po ryT �Ji• .. .. through'. the park, picnic ,tables, benches, and a backstop w h r `y , r�' for playing ball. 0A /I//%}fZ� JY_ L/ - 6Yv. S. fi 7 4 Y t �a x .fnZa w ♦,t• , f� IC n r "(, c ,Lt _ �dy.y.lfp f.w M 3v •�.Lr�. ,Y{-f{�r'�"r�•°i,•a� �$�. �j usd'w�aro rt T r� �X�r z/' � �£ � i m t .tl,a .�y Y1•.. �5 ��x�: 'u •'•"+T'ar xl3 z�.se v � t fy hr � � •�' i d}„c •y ^.° . +. ?t•!,} :-'+,.� rr t• '� °' ai a.-. r + �t{5�:S x n {* sem- •i N s�`r-s.5, r P'" f,•i..,+�f 33 x' i a �; .,# s.'..•Ga•�6 V { J � �P � � Yv� ix +{ �# �• V " �( �CJ..�I ��1./' /"ice %� �� // • r/ I �/ �' � 7 - � r���}t.�• .� � i ry, � ash s t -tr � / R M F t _ 5t 4 7 gy L ,�Y ,,i ��� / �'x 1. � 4r+F �stii e�'vw,��zr?iy 9=f �t4c.*. �.'�:: :ta�rK�y'�v"g4'.�„ y-, 5•I� }Y? � � +K . Z �t ��"`r�'4.30,2�� '`fid x "'y,,.'e•L,�a. - ;,; a!Le3:t`,'��il�`;: ' ,.t ,:y, ..y- r - ° i �, .� w^ :. .5 ..c ,ii'` „r �a1 h_'�•.,(•-. �.,y,,. : �+.� t t f f.s ,�.i t +l � � �" - � y 'i � .+ yi h "'o �, fc �� � .: --.-V tw�4 y}; ,� --• i L 'a3 z .. X .e Yt -) # qr,„y '3 x �1 a.<S {' - 4 -ii rrt { i. b- f y `I+"s t r 1,�@ !' f a ,z � ,ri.P 3 + �.' � 4 •rIV�' sN>Fr , �t+�-R'"<y.r't �i yti`r�,F -erg-s --.,x'+,-�-Y.s' �� � "'�r1':� x +nt,+�' .+ ,,r-.. u°x �i � r"� f -+t e� � - � •r v -,+^ :q: fir. [� w5�+ FSi+,r "To- 2. "' i.•4=; .,T �' d"'r . �.Y � 2.s�r, T. T' r 'r .W f..�,' ; �'ta �t+� y;. . 4 F y I F . � ,4 i a4 >.=i. +'+. _- ,4M i, , r� ^t� �.f 'r i� �5 ,k�� r j �� p•,�.. w - . �Sy- 1 k 'YT's.G�t � }i -r�f}; '�,•:+ i �'. T .}� i T .A' � i-.�3-t t "� r .. +v i � y Y � � `t � n• s -�, 4 i"' »S "'L � y a y .s L .+r 1 � - _{ �„a,+�• } S' ,.�' 3 "� � �+' l J� ,� s z,g` { ,�� ) � ;� .,,y JI'a�sxt � y5 s 4 r�z-:`�' .�- _ -r .; -- � v �7tT '�' �s AS.. �+`: Sr_ r'`"' t �' L �-.it - "= �� �Pt _ .{, Y"^, 4 -,R F�xT •4; MS+ 1 f �"�. ! 3..�.-_!. Y� J' .Y 4t .awn.' 4 ••k `1°'�__4:.L. ;'2 _ N_t ti _ gj t � � 7 � � t We, the undersigned, hereby a.-ree with the proposed improve- ments to Lakeside Park including a blacktop play area, more playground equipment, a blacktop trail thr,&u5h the park, picnic tables, benches, and a backstop lmr playing ball. &te �3a p S ! � � ^ ' G� r Cl * ujM �� ' Car 5S1a�_ 4 -m -t) 1, .C- d X464 ), AO) sf /,Z3 � 7G ? l9e7 �Ta . /� i ta-Q- &ztalx_ /DaAA� 60-a-4 r -70 Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen PARKING LOT VARIANCE FOR FIRE STATIONS B. Variance Consideration for Certain Parking Lot Improvements for Fire Stations 1, 2 and 3 --At the May 5 City Council meeting, the Director of Public Works presented parking lot/driveway improvements as recommended by the Fire Chief for Fire Stations 1, 2 and 3. The improvement for Fire Station 3 is considered a minor patch and does not cause encroachment or setback concerns to any adjoining property owners. The improvement for Fire Stations 1 and 2 do impact the City setback requirements and therefore the City has notified the adjoining property owners for Fire Stations 1 and 2 that the City is contemplating improvements to the parking lot and driveway surfaces for each of those two fire stations. The Director of Public Works and City Administrator were discussing the proposed improvements and felt that it was appropriate to advise the City Council of another alternative to the parking lot improvements. Currently, the City requires curb and gutter for driveway and parking lot improvements for all commercial/industrial buildings. If the parking lots at Stations 1, 2 and 3 are improved without curb and gutter, the City could be accused of inconsistently enforcing its parking lot driveway development regulations. As an alternative, the City could authorize any temporary patching this summer with the understanding that the parking lots for all three (3) stations will be brought into compliance in 1988. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the Planning Department report. Also enclosed on page5;% is a copy of a letter that was sent to the adjoining neighbors for Fire Stations 1 and 2. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize improvements to Fire Stations 1, 2 and 3 or authorize temporary patching and direct a permanent improvement for all three (3) parking lots and driveways for consideration in 1988. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REVISED SITE PLANS APPLICANT: EAGAN FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCATIONS: STATION 1, 3940 RAHN RD STATION 2, 2980 LONE OAK CR STATION 3, 4390 PILOT KNOB RD EXISTING ZONING: STATION 1, PUBLIC FACILITY WITHIN CEDAR GROVE STATION 2, PUBLIC FACILITY WITHIN THE EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 2 STATION 3, PUBLIC FACILITY WITHIN WIL- DERNESS RUN DATE OF PUBLIC MEETING: MAY 19, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 12, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN SUMMARIES: The Eagan Fire Department has submitted plans to revise the site plans for Fire Stations 1, 2, and 3. Enclosed is a summary of the proposed changes. Rtat; r%n i The blacktop area on the north side of the station would be enlarged to accommodate more firefighters' automobiles. The back (east) side and the front sides would be enlarged to allow for easier truck movement. No new concrete curbing would be installed. The. enlargement of the blacktop area on the back side of the station is to allow for easier access to the rear entrance doors of the station by larger trucks. The remaining grass areas to be removed are to allow for more area for cars and trucks. No new concrete curbing would be installed. The small enlargement at the corner of the driveway and parking area is to "fill-in" the hole that has been created by the trucks cutting across the grass. This will then make a nearly straight- out exit from the station to Pilot Knob Road for the emergency vehicles. No new concrete curbing would be installed. STAT � o Aj � I 06 LAQF- OL 74- 10 tA 31 1 -3-31-97 3 —3 x-87 ST pt7- \o � a PtibPaKTyp%o Pcft" \NE L_%luE ye' Tqb� J TR 6 pvT i 6t• 3't{�G�t A l P, wat_L Spp�EN .H�I F:::T tp � 2 � . STPC-. e,�TYS a Cor,onLs S, ---- • f`' . Q TRK A OO �T1orV 3 OUT LLLLZ _Q RETAjN�N(, W R 4'- \ T1ikE Tt� SP�+`^� CoNCRETF_ 50i� ou.T . P►-A�-E \ �SucE 3� H VGH /7 p Rv\to cz, A ?-"E N X X X 3-31-87 P � i_�T l�No t3 fZO, JrcPc� � NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CITY OF EAGAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on May 19 1987, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. a Public Meeting will be held by the Eagan City Council at the Eagan'City Hall pursuant to the application of Eagan City_Fire Department in accordance with chapters 11 & 13 of the Eagan City Code to consider the application for Revised site plans to the stati of property located in DAkota County, Minnesota, T-27, R -23W, described as follows: Located in the NW4 of Section 20 on Rahn Road at Valley View Drive. Dated: May 12, 1987 EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAGAN E. J. VanOverbeke City Clerk 179 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CITY OF EAGAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on May 19 1987, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. a Public Meeting will be held by the Eagan City Council at the Eagan City Hall pursuant to the application of Eagan City Fire Department in accordance with chapters 11 & 13 of the Eagan City Code to consider the application for Revised site plans to the fire station. of property located in DAkota County, Minnesota, T-27, R -23W, described as follows: Located in the SWC of Section 2 on Lone Oak Circle. Dated: May 12, 1987 EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAGAN E. J. VanOverbeke City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING CITY OF EAGAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on May 19 1987, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. a Public Meeting will be held by the Eagan City Council at the Eagan City Hall pursuant to the application of Eagan Cite Fire Department in accordance with chapters 11 & 13 of the Eagan City Code to consider the application for Revised site plans to the fire station. of property located in DAkota County, Minnesota, T-27, R -23W, described as follows: Located in the NA of Section 27 on the NE corner of Pilot Knob Road and Wilderness Run Road. Dated: May 12, 1987 EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAGAN E. J. VanOverbeke City Clerk Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen ORDINANCE AMENDMENT/OFF-SITE TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS C. Consideration of Ordinance Amendment Regarding the Regulation of Off -Site Temporary Advertising Signs --At the April 21, 1987 meeting, consideration was given to the adoption of an amendment to the City Code that would restrict the location of off-site advertising/developme t signs. A copy of that proposed ordinance is enclosed on page and under Section 4.20, Subdivison 2A, the last sentence reads as follows: "No off-site advertising/development signs shall be permitted." The restriction in this regard is a ban of all off-site advertising signs. Also included in that ordinance proposal is the omission of item 3 under C which currently reads "area identification signs for major apartment complexes." That language is eliminated from the proposed ordinance. Representatives of the Developers Task Force were present at the April 21 meeting, and raised a number of issues and concerns about the inverse effect a total ban of off-site temporary advertising signs could cause to the community with the amount of development that is occurring during these active growth years. The City Council redirected the off-site temporary advertising sign issue back to the Developers Task Force, asking that a findings be presented no later than the May 19 City Council meeting. Enclosed on pages f5 through & is a memo from the City Administrator to the Developers Task Force, outlining the directive taken by the City Council. A meeting was held on May 7 and the Developers Task Force spent approximately two hours discussing the impact a total ban of off- site temporary advertising signs would have on the consumer finding real estate development areas throughout the community. The Developers Task Force expressed a concern that individual builders and some developers would pepper intersections throughout the community with small directional signs that conform to the less than ten day regulation within the City Code. In other words, a develop- ment that has several builders constructing homes within the subdivision could all put up small signs on intersections on various weekends and comply with the temporary off-site directional sign ten day limit. There was a concern expressed that a more restrictive ordinance as opposed to a total ban would allow fewer directional signs if regulated properly. The Developers Task Force is recommending two options for consideration by the City Council and is highly supportive of option number 1 which is entitled "the Restrictive Ordinance." The Restrictive Ordinance would allow off-site temporary advertising signs during each calendar year from April through November. Option number 2 is a phasing schedule that is encouraged if the City Council wishes to proceed with a total ban ordinance. Because the construction season is so far along this year, it would be difficult for developers and builders to change their marketing strategy during this calendar year and, therefore, it was encouraged that Ov Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen OLD BUSINESS CONT'D. temporary off-site advertising signs be allowed until November 1, 1987, under this consideration. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the review and recommendations as prepared by the Developer Task Force at their May 7 meeting, and also enclosed on page is a map indicating the location of existing signs and propose signs for off-site temporary advertising signs if the restrictive ordinance is approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a recommendation of the Developers Task Force regarding the enforcement of off-site temporary advertising signs. ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF' EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE, CHAPTER 4, ENTITLED "CO1110— 'RUCt'ION LICENSING, PERMITS AND REGULATIONS, INCLUDING SIGNS, EXCAVATIONS, AND MOBILE HOME PARKS" BY AMENDING PROVISIONS REGARDING LOCATION OF ADVERTISING AND BUSINESS SIGNS. THE CIi'Y COUNCIL OF THE CI'T'Y OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Eagan City Code, Chapter 4, is hereby amended by amending a Section to read: SEC. 4.20. PLACEMENT, ERECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. A. Location of Advertising Signs. Advertising signs are permitted on property zoned Business or Industrial. No off site advertising/development signs shall be permitted. B. Location of Business Signs. Business signs are permitted on property zoned Business, Industrial, Agricultural, Public Facilities, R & D or PD only in conjunction with an approved Business, Industrial or Agricultural use. C. Location of Business Signs in Residential Areas. Business signs in Residentially zoned areas or areas of PO designation for residential use only under the following cases: 1. "For Sale" or "For Rent" signs, 4 feet x 4 feet or smaller, advertising the premises upon which such sign is located. 2. One (1) Temporary on site sign containing no more than 100 square feet with a ten (10) foot maximum height shall be permitted. Section 2. Eagan City Code, Chapter 4.99 entitled "Violation, A Misdemeanor" is hereby adopted in its entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon.its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Clerk Its Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: April 21, 1987 Date Ordinance Published in the legal newspaper: s MEMO TO: DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 24, 1987 SUBJECT: STATUS OF DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE AND REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL MEETING ON THURSDAY, MAY 7, 1987 At a special City Council Meeting that was held on March 31, 1987 the City Council reviewed the status of the Developers Task Force. It was determined by the City Council that the Developers Task Force would continue as a special Ad Hoc Committee and meet on a formal basis when directed by the City Council. The City Council also recognizes the value of the Developers Task Force meeting periodically to discuss issues of common concern to both the City and development community and will recognize this future effort understanding that there will be no formal agendas or minutes taken. If the Developers Task Force is specifically asked to address an issue, there will be agendas and formal minutes. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein provided a summarization of the issues that have been reviewed by the Developers Task Force in addition to organizational opportunities for the Developers Task Force in light of its sunset of March 1, 1987. A copy of this memo and support documents is enclosed for your review. This information was forwarded to the City Council as a part of their staff review in preparation for the March 31, 1987, meeting. Regarding the recommendation of the Developers Task Force for uniform multi-user directional signs to replace the temporary advertising signs that have been allowed for a maximum of two (2) years by developers, the City Council did take action at their March 31 meeting. The action taken by the City Council was to ban any and all off-site directional/temporary advertising signs for developments within our community. An ordinance ammendment was given consideration at the City Council Meeting on Tuesday, April 21, 1987. Both Rod'Hardy.and Dan Gustafson were present representing the Developers Task Force. Mr. Hardy did present a number of arguments as to why some type of directional signs are required for development projects within the community. Mr. Hardy suggested that the Developers Task Force be given an oppor- tunity to address the City Council's concerns and review any alternatives that would allow some type of directional sign for the benefit of guiding potential lot or home buyers to develop- ments within the community. The City Council is hopeful that the development community can effectively use either the media or some other information source to replace directional/ temporary advertising signs. The City Council continued any further consideration on a revised ordinance that would ban directional/temporary advertising signs until the May 21 meeting to allow the Developers Task Force to meet again and review their concerns and make any additional recommendations for City Council consideration. A special meeting of the Developers Task Force is scheduled for Thursday, May 7, at 4:30 P.M. in conference rooms A and B. Please contact this office if you are unable to attend the meeting. C� X, 94� - City A ministrator TLH/yn OFF-SITE TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS On May 7, the Developers Task Force met to review the proposed ordinance regarding temporary off-site advertising signs throughout the community. After considerable discussion and review, the Task Force agreed with the concerns expressed by the City Council regarding the problems with the proliferation of temporary off-site advertising signs presently allowed under the current ordinance, but felt that specific controls could provide comparable results of the proposed "Total Ban" Ordinance. Therefore, before formal action regarding a Total Ban Ordinance is acted upon by Council, the Developers Task Force would like to have the following two options given serious consideration by the Council: I. RESTRICTIVE ORDINANCE This ordinance would restrict the number, location and timing of any off-site temporary advertising signs according to the following general outlines: A. Timing 1. Seasonal: April 1 to November 1 of any given year. B. Location 1. Temporary on-site advertising signs would be "banned" at the intersection of two (2) Community Collector (or greater) type classification streets identified by the attached map. 2. Signs would be allowed only within one-half mile radius of the identified site. C. Number Maximum of two (2) signs for: 1. Any subdivision of five or more residential lots. 2. Any commercial development of 10,000 sq. ft. or greater. D. Enforcement 1. Enforcement would be by City personnel through a forfeiture of: a) $50 escrow per sign; and b) the right of a renewal application for the following year. V II. PHASING SCHEDULE If the proposed "Total Ban" ordinance is adopted, it is recommended that it be phased in to accommodate the following: A. New Applications/Permits 1. Permits would be issued for new applications providing for installations valid only until November 1, 1987. 2. No new permits would be issued thereafter in accordance with the proposed ordinance. B. Existing Permits 1. Signs permitted under existing permits would be allowed until their previously approved expiration date. The attached map identifies the location of the regulated street classification system to help identify those intersections where temporary off-site advertising signs would be prohibited in accordance with Option #I above. Also shown on this map are those intersections where current temporary off-site advertising signs are presently located by existing permits. The Developers Task Force strongly recommends the adoption of Option #I (Restrictive Ordinance) as it is felt that this will greatly minimize the problems as identified by the Council and general public. However, it will still provide those developments an ability to provide direction from a major collector street onto a minor side street once the individual is within one-half mile of that site. It is felt this last directional sign is necessary due to the diminishing ability of the traveling public to identify the minor local street while traveling the higher classified collector street. Also, it is felt that by permitting these signs to be installed only from April 1 to November 1, it will ensure that new signs are installed every year thereby eliminating the potential of little or no maintenance concerns on deteriorating signs. 0 �-. 'TEMPORARY. SIGNS, A �r B DE F G H I J K L FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS MEN COMMUNITY -COLLECTORS { �' ;r % NMM MINOR ARTERIALS I ' i , �� •• RI . ••••••••N INTERMEDIATEARTERIALS -•) p.. PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS e ' " q eis. ` • icun�� � � � �"' � _ «our::. 6 , �.s ' • n. , =+ f :�—r. ---a. ®�1 - �•.. F .rte a e'--•—�.. E i ja Vs —'� yyy. 5.. liT"—cid .� . `I - �}• _ , 55 22� �� t IR L ,. r.,. c . T� mac., J• � ,s�_• r � ' � � :g- ?' o ..r � r W `Zi. FA - APPL~ VALL Y ® I Ros. WT� A a (R'* D A f' >< 0 1t �H "4': 4. r-1 k l� K L OFF SITE 80 • . r :ON SITE ''1:16 . 3. Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty SPECIAL PERMIT%TWO-DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR DOMINIUM GROUP D. Special Permit for Four 4' x 8' Two -Directional Signs to be Located on Certain Intersections --The Dominium Group, developers of Thomas Lake Apartment Complex located on Thomas Lake Road, appeared before the City Council at the April 21 meeting, requesting four (4) 4' x 8' two -directional signs to be located at 1) the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Cliff Road, 2) the intersection of Thomas Lake and Cliff Road, 3) Lot 2, Block 1, Knob Hill Professional Park and 4) the intersection of Diffley Road and Thomas Lake Road. The Dominium Group was told in early April that the City Council was considering a total ban of off-site temporary advertising/direc- tional signs and the ordinance amendment would be considered at the April 21 meeting. As a result of action at the April 21 meeting to send the directional/off-site temporary advertising sign ordinance amendment back to the Developers Task Force, the special permit as requested by Dominium Group was continued until the May 19 meeting. The present ordinance only allows for two (2) off-site temporary advertising signs. If action is take under item C of Old Business for either of the options, the Dominium Group could only be allowed two (2) off-site advertising/directional signs. If the City Council decides to adopt the ordinance totally banning off-site temporary advertising/directional signs, this special permit would be denied due to its nonconformance with City Code regulations. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the Planning Department report that was prepared for the April 21 meeting, regarding the request made by the Dominium Management Service Group. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special permit for Dominium Group, allowing off-site directional signs pending action taken under item C of Old Business. is CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: DOMINIUM MANAGEMENT SERVICE, INC. (THERESE MURPHY) LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 28, SW AND SE 1/4'S OF SECTION 21 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY), AGRICULTURE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (82-4) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 21, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 15, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a special permit to allow four (4) two-way directional signs all of which will be 4' x 8' in dimension, allowing for a total of 32 square feet per side. PLANNER COMMENTS: At a March 31, 1987 meeting of the City Council, direction was given relative to the processing of "directional" sign �= applications and for the preparation of a sign code amendment that . tightly regulates future placement of said signs. This application is forwarded to the City Council for consideration, however, because to date the pending code amendment has not been officially adopted. In absence of this code amendment, the Planning Department will continue to process sign applications pursuant to the duly adopted City of Eagan sign ordinance. Dominium Management Services, Incorporated is presently constructing Thomas Lake Point Apartments located on Thomas Lake Road, approximately equadistant between Diffley and Cliff Roads. The project was given final plat approval by the City Council on November 19, 1985 and consists of 216 units with occupancy expected to commence in July, 1988. A The purpose for the directional signs is to direct potential occupants to the project area which is relatively secluded. The four directional signs will be located at the northeast quadrant of Thomas Lake and Cliff Roads, the northwest quadrant of Cliff and Pilot Knob Roads, the northwest quadrant of Pilot Knob and Diffley Roads, and directly across Thomas Lake Road as it intersects with Diffley. (Please refer to the enclosed exhibits for specific sign locations.) If approved, the four two -directional signs shall be subject to all } applicable sign and City Code Ordinances. V SIGN LOCATIONS THOMAS LAKE POINTE * SIGN LOCATIONS PROJECT LOCATION y4- I til j• tli jr Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One REZONING/PONDVIEW E. Rezoning of Approximately 30 Acres from A to PD to Commercial and Mixed Residential Planned Development --At the May 5, 1987 City Council meeting, a recommendation submitted by the APC to recommend approval of the rezoning from A to PD Commercial and Mixed Residential proposed for the Pondview development was continued until the May 19 meeting. The purpose for the continuance was to allow the proposed users of property scheduled for development within the Pondview Addition an opportunity to more accurately define their parcels before a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and rezoning is considered. To date, the City has not received any further indication from the Fairview Group or landowners regarding the specificity of which location the Fairview medical facility will own and develop. It is anticipated that the developers will be notifying the City prior to preparation of the Administrative Agenda on Monday, May 18 and, therefore, additional information will be provided at that time. For review purposes a copy of the reports that were presented with the May 5 City Council agenda packet, are again enclosed on pages through ZZa for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning assuming there is a proposed site/use designated by the Fairview Group for the property. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THE REZONING - POND VIEW P.D. APPLICANT: MOLINARO AND ASSOCIATES LOCATION: PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 16 EXISTING ZONING: R-2 UNDER THE BLACKHAWK PARK P.D. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 23, 1986, CONTINUED TO THE APRIL 28, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 22, 1987 Attached with this update is the original staff report dated September 16, 1986, which give background information on the area being requested to be included in the Planned Development. The updated portion of this report deals with two issues, the first issue is the traffic study which was requested by the Advisory Planning Commission at either the January or February APC meeting. This traffic study report was submitted to the City staff on April 20, 1987, staff is in the process of reviewing the document and will be ready to make comments to the Advisory Planning Commission on April 28. In regard to the traffic area, it appears that the developments surrounding the Pilot Knob/Yankee Doodle intersection have been taken into account to determine the ultimate impact on the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road. In this analysis, it appears that approximately 95,000 trips + will be generated from all of the surrounding developments. Of the 95,000 trips approximately 50% will be generated from Town Centre 70 and only 5% of the trips will be generated from the Pond View development proposal. Therefore, the impact appears to be minor with the trips generated from Pond View on the entire transportation system. Again, the traffic aspect will be discussed in detail once an analysis of the traffic report has been made. The use or uses proposed are: :still somewhat similar to the original application submitted in September of 1986. Lot 1 - the applicants are still proposing a one-story restaurant facility seating 242 people. Lot 2 - this is still the location of the three-story motel with 110 rooms. Lot 3• - the applicant is still proposing a car care facility. This particular use has created the most concern to the City Council in regard to uses in the planned development. The multiple site on the west side of the proposed north/south street is the first area of change from the last review. Since the time the traffic study has been ordered, the Fairview Development Company has become interested in this area for an Urgent Care Facility. The major issue is signage and easy accessibility to the general public. Presently, the applicants have chosen a site that does have exposure from I -35E and also is located on part of the original graded pad for the Check Technology building. This facility is proposed to construct a 12,000 square foot one-story facility with an expansion capability of 10,400 square feet of additional space. This facility could be the start of the campus setting that the Economic � 9a Development Commission and City Council has tried to capture with the one-year development goal. As stated earlier, this use has decreased the multiple use from the original 208 to 108 multiple units proposed. At the present time, there is no specific proposal for construction of the multiple facility and the City could consider this as one of the elderly housing sites in the future if the P.D. is approved with the Urgent Care Facility directly to the north. The elderly study which has been suggested by the Council has been completed but the task force to identify locations has not been initiated at this time, therefore, any specific proposal or recommendation for elderly locations would have to be determined in the future. The last use of the parcel in the southwest corner was the townhouse site. At the present time, this site has been sold to Meritor Development who has indicated that they would like to retain the townhouse area but had no immediate plans for development. It was suggested at one time that with the 108 units of the original 208 units of multiple to the north that the density for this townhouse area be transferred north of the pond and open space be required to the south. The area now has been sold to Meritor Development and this transfer is no longer possible. It is suggested, however, that the density not be established at this time and that the number of units be proven on the site at a later point in time. The Urgent Care Facility proposed by the Ridges has a time frame that would involve starting construction as soon as possible with a goal to open the facility by December of 1987. Therefore, if the P.D. does not proceed through the development process, the ' applicants will have to seek an alternate location in order to meet the time schedule set forth in their development plan. The conditions of the September 16 report are still applicable. c c:= 92 CONDITIONS: POND VIEW P.D. 1. The applicant and owner enter into a planned development agreement or amendment to the conditions of the planned development in accordance with the concept plan submitted for the six or seven lots proposed. 2. The overall plan be reviewed by the Dakota County Highway Department and the Minnesota Department of Transportation because this project abutts these rights-of-way. 3. A comprehensive plan amendment be processed in accordance with the particular used allowed in this plan. 4. Prior to any first phase development, the existing residents of the property be in agreement as to how and when the relocation will take place. 5. Due to the expeditious review process by the Ridges facility, it would be suggested that any of the uses not specifically approved in the concept be omitted and carried as an outlot in order to expedite the planned development review process. This hopefully updates you as to the status of the Pond View P.D. MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DALE RUNKEL, CITY PLANNER FROM: ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE: APRIL 23, 1987 SUBJECT: POND VIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - STAFF REPORT UPDATE (TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS) The Engineering Report of October 28, 1986, is still applicable to this proposed development. However, consideration of this proposed development was continued to allow staff to do a specific Traffic Impact Analysis Study for this development in relationship to the adjacent roadway network system. In order to determine the impact of the proposed Pond View development, consideration had to be given for other potential developments within an overall study area that might affect the same roadway network system. This overall study area is bounded by Lone Oak Road on the north, Wescott Road on the south, Lexington Avenue on the east and T.H. 13 on the west. The attached map shows the study area and the current remaining or proposed future developable sites within this study area. Results of this detailed Traffic Impact Analysis Study indicate that there will be severe capacity problems on individual roadway '.' segments and specific intersections in the year 1991 and the year 2000. r However, the volume of traffic generated by this development represents a very small percentage of the overall traffic volumes and, in and of itself, does not create any of the identified traffic congestions or capacity problems at any given location. The development, however, contributes to the growth in area traffic and as a result may be obligated to financial support of future roadway improvements. In order to properly evaluate the impact on various intersections, this study also incorporated the traffic generation considerations from the Town Centre development which includes the pending Town Centre 70 8th Addition and Town Centre 100 4th Addition proposals. Attached to this report is the "Summary of Conclusions" and "Recommended Improvements" that were identified in the Impact Study performed by the consulting engineering firm of Strgar-Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. Subsequently, with the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road scheduled by Dakota County to begin in 1987, which takes into consideration this proposed development, no additional significant improvements are anticipated or required beyond those identified in the previous staff report of October, 1986. mv M POND VIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PAGE 2 Staff will be available to discuss in further detail the results and implications of the Comprehensive Traffic Impact Study in relationship to this proposed development at the April Planning Commission meeting. No additional conditions of approval beyond those prey! usly presented are proposed by staff. Director of Pdblic Works TAC/ jj 0 GOND VIEW PLANNED DEVELOPMENT — ENGINEERING REPORT -Page 4 10/28/86 CONDITIONS POND VIEW: 1. This development shall be responsible for extending the 12" trunk storm sewer from I -35E along with all internal storm sewer to the NWL of JP -3. 2. This development shall extend an 8" sanitary sewer under Duckwood Drive to provide service to the area to the north. 3. Council shall authorize the installation of the 30" and 12" trunk water main and the upgrading of Duckwood Drive and Englert Road to City standards prior to final plat approval. 4. This development shall be responsible for an 8' trail along Pilot Knob Road and a 5' concrete sidewalk along the south side of Duckwood Drive. 5. Dedicate ponding and utility easement for JP -3 to HWL. 6. Dedicate. sufficient right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road in accordance with County requirements. 7. Dedicate the necessary drainage and utility easements in accordance with City ordinances or Staff's recommendations. 8. Responsible for trunk area assessments or upgrading of assessments for water area, storm area, water lateral benefit, Pilot Knob Road upgrading and trailway at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 9. Include a portion of 010-76, which is east of Pilot Knob Road, with this plat. 10. The applicant and owner enter into a planned development agreement or amendment to the conditions of the planned development, in accordance with the concept plan submitted for the 6 lots. 11. The overall plan be reviewed by the Dakota County Highway Department and the Minnesota Department of Transportation because this project abuts these right-of-ways. 12. A comprehensive plan amendment be processed in accordance with this particular plan. 13. Prior to any first phase development, the existing residents of the property be in agreeement as to how and when their relocation will take place. M F; cc H 0 0 O O O U) Y � '3AV N8VY4N30 N F- W O Z x O Cl) = Q t- a , Z a CO p>-�aui cZl=- s•' -o? QOx tea, Z aWccMLIJ 1= Z J W 3oz =C/)zom N woiWWZOQQO O-1 pJZZdW L)CCQW j OZ00a-i0a-j W a0E-f-xm0Na amV[][u�C7x_ 167,11 p6. 0 E OR0 CC, T W Ir V w W W w ” a0 } o cn z 3 AV N OION I X 3l •, , . �.„„, z 0. + LC a:1 I t '0i:€r`Ut3NX 101id F; cc H 0 0 O O O U) Y � '3AV N8VY4N30 N F- W O Z x O Cl) = Q t- a , Z a CO p>-�aui cZl=- s•' -o? QOx tea, Z aWccMLIJ 1= Z J W 3oz =C/)zom N woiWWZOQQO O-1 pJZZdW L)CCQW j OZ00a-i0a-j W a0E-f-xm0Na amV[][u�C7x_ 167,11 p6. 0 E OR0 CC, T W Ir V w W W w ” a0 } o cn z POND VIEW DEVELOPMENT :. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ! • The anticipated development in the study area, expected to occur by 1991, would add close to 95,000 trips per day to existing traffic. Z * Pond View development represents approximately 5 percent of all new trips generated in the study area. 3 a Development anticipated beyond 1991 would add over 5,000 trips per day if the sites analyzed are developed residential and over 48,000 trips per day if developed as commercial/office. CL- Providing six lanes of through traffic between Federal Drive and Denmark Avenue. - Providing a westbound to northbound on-ramp from Yankee Doodle Road to I -35E.. This would eliminate the need for a signal at this location. Provision of a loop system of roads that would allow non - local traffic to bypass the Pilot Knob/Yankee Doodle/I-35 ramps area of congestion. f • Another option consists of controlling traffic growth by U limiting the amount of development in the area, or by selecting the type of development that will reduce transportation system demand. The level of development anticipated in the study area is of such a magnitude that serious congestion problems will occur, particularly on Yankee Doodle Road. The key problem intersection is Pilot Knob Road at Yankee Doodle Road. The daily approach volumes at this intersection are projected to increase between 100 percent and 200 percent over existing volumes by the year 1991. : � In addition to Pilot Knob, four more intersections along Yankee Doodle (up to Lexington Avenue) will be over capacity by 1991, unless certain roadway improvements are made. +r Even with limited roadway improvements, however, the growth in anticipated traffic is such that longer range solutions should -,� have to be examined. These include: CL- Providing six lanes of through traffic between Federal Drive and Denmark Avenue. - Providing a westbound to northbound on-ramp from Yankee Doodle Road to I -35E.. This would eliminate the need for a signal at this location. Provision of a loop system of roads that would allow non - local traffic to bypass the Pilot Knob/Yankee Doodle/I-35 ramps area of congestion. f • Another option consists of controlling traffic growth by U limiting the amount of development in the area, or by selecting the type of development that will reduce transportation system demand. SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: MOLINARO AND ASSOCIATES — POND VIEW P.U.D. LOCATION: PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 16 BETWEEN I -35E & PILOT KNOB ROAD EXISTING ZONING: R-2, UNDER THE BLACKHAWK PARK P.D. AND A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 23, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 29.7 acres from R-2,in the Blackhawk Park Planned Development, and A (agricultural) to a planned development which would allow a mixed commercial multiple residential use on the 29.7 acres. The specific uses would include Lot 1, a Bonanza Restaurant consisting of 242 seats, Lot 2, a three story motel consisting of 110 units, Lot 3, a 14,000 S.F. office, Lot 4, a 14,000 S.F. office, Lot 5, a ten story 208 unit apartment and Lot 6, a 41 unit townhouse development. ZONING AND LAND USE: In the review of this 29 acre parcel it appears that a portion is within the Blackhawk Park north and a small portion of the property could be outside of the planned development depending upon where the actual road right-of-way is for I -35E. In either case, the property would require amending the zoning to allow a mixed commercial/residential planned development as specifically stated above. The Comprehensive Guide Plan had been amended in 1985 with the application of the CTC Check Technology proposal. The zoning and planned development was approved and the Comprehensive Guide did allow a change in the land use to an LB (limited business) use for the northern 10 acres of this property. Technically, a comprehensive plan amendment should be required in order to allow a higher intensity commercial use, as is now being proposed, versus the limited business which is presently on the property. BACKGROUND: In October of 1984, the City received an application from Anderson Development, Inc., proposing to construct a corporate headquarters for a company called Check Technology Corporation. POND VIEW - REZONING SEPTEMBER 23, 1986 PAGE 2 This development proposal consisted of a 72,000 S.F. office show room structure which was to be the corporate headquarters for Check' Technology Corporation. This request was looked at as major land use change from the 1980 Comprehensive Guide which originally designated this entire parcel as an R -II mixed residential with a density of 3 - 6 units per acre. It was in the 1984 - 1985 process that it was determined to try to coordinate the individual parcels and come up with one master plan or planned development as to how to develop this entire tract of property. It was the intention of Anderson Development to develop this parcel as a commercial facility. Needless to say, this development has not gone forward and Anderson Development is no longer involved as owners or applicants with this proposed project. The submission made in September, 1986, would consist of six lots, four commercial and two residential. The four commercial lots could possibly be conceived as a higher intensity use than what was originally proposed in 1984. The applicants have, however, done an excellent job in coordinating the entire tract of property between the residential owners - the Reeds, Mr. Cornwall on the north and Mr. Dunn on the south. The property takes into account mixed use, an overall circulation and•a fairly detailed concept plan as to how this area would be proposed to be developed. The original application also included a request for a preliminary plat in the first phase which would be the Bonanza Restaurant on Lot 1 of this development. Their detailed plans were received late by the City staff and the preliminary plat could not be processed in time to consider the first phase development along with the overall concept of the planned development. The plans have been submitted to City staff and will be processed and scheduled for the October Planning: Commission meeting for a detailed review of the first phase. Since the concept plan was fairly detailed, the staff suggested that an overall concept be looked at and a review made on the total development versus detailing one specific use. Along with the land use change, the circulation pattern has changed from the original concept. As you may recall, the original concept with the one use building had a loop circulation road running along the east property all the way down to Englert Road. The new circulation plan is showing a stub access on Duckwood Drive to the right-of-way of I -35E. This would allow an alternative to an overpass if in fact traffic studies and circulation patterns for Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road would require alternate bypasses. Again, this is only a preventative measure and it is by no means suggested that it be done or would even be feasibile. The access to the project would be from Duckwood Road bisecting Lots 1 and 2, 3 and 5 and 3 and 4, thus creating a loop system with a right in, right out at Crestridge Lane and full movement from the intersection of Duckwood Drive. There is a question as to the need to provide access to the south to Englert Road in connection with this development plan. ,. POND VIEW - REZONING SEPTEMBER 23, 1986 PAGE 3 In review of the overall land use issues, there is one comment staff would like to make in respect to the overall density of the development proposal. Presently the property is zoned R-2 (mixed residential) with a density of 3 - 6 dwelling units per acre allowed in the Blackhawk Park Planned Development. The application submitted is a request for a high-rise facility consisting of 208 units, 10 stories at a density of 25.3 units per net acre. This is a substantial increase in density from the original planned development agreement. The applicant is also proposing an additional 41 townhouse units on Lot 6, on the south end of this project. Staff is suggesting that some density shifts be made to potentially allow the multiple unit on the north side of the pond and the townhouse project eliminated with just open space provided. This would create the open space and transition area of this triangular piece of property for higher intensity uses on the north changing to residential south of Englert Road. In developing the plan in this manner, it would eliminate any potential need to provide access to Englert Road from the property north of the pond. This is merely a suggestion to create a buffer zone and separate these land uses. It is staff's understanding that the developer is not in agreement with this proposal and is requesting some density on the south side of the pond, just north of Englert Road. If in fact density is allowed south of,the pond, some environmental issues may be triggered even though an Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared for the Blackhawk Park Planned Development. This gives you the overall concept for this planned development proposal. Again, the first phase has been submitted to City staff for a Bonanza Restaurant located on Lot 1 and if the planned .=' development is approved, will be processed at the October 28, 1986, Advisory Planning Commission meeting. CONDITIONS: 1, The applicant and owner enter into a planned development agreement or amendment to the conditions of the planned development, in accordance with the concept plan submitted for the 6 lots. 2. The overall plan be reviewed by the Dakota County Highway Department and the Minnesota Department of Transportation because this project abuts these right-of-ways. 3. A comprehensive plan amendment be processed in accordance with this particular plan. 4. Prior to any first phase development, the existing residents of the property be in agreeement as to how and when their relocation will take place. OUARRY PAW 6- C 9jr. rm X59F 4CILM"Wr .r OLEAR LW .6 KS SARA" PUSLOC WOR all -,A It AMPlb ADAF N rY- -Y 8 DA 1.1 MUw/ CFRr'E"',A rrw Ac trw, I T ACt, JAN ox XE D SURREY GARDE. m H +08 R S A 9F. 'GAN] A Lt3 L R-11 RAI z.ro FN -csc 141 p FLB) R-91 R-1 -BLA, T P— OTY R-11 ifsHALL R-11 E R U p R-11 R-11 LB 1 �! fie t1 i� i lid illi �iil ilii ilii !) IIII Illi �l III) II I IIIE s,i F : fill ts¢C j _ i —� w� q1;j I kV6 •,.00I�T[R. POND VIEW P.U.D. ff---aomr PRELIMINARY PLAT THORSEN CORNWELL 6200 WILLSON RD. 1 0 Q% 0 R0 L ASSOCUTIS-- POND VIEW P.U.D. TMOR5EN CORNWELL 92DO WILLSON "D EDINA LIN 1414 .11-11.1. I APC Minutes April 28, 1987 POND VIEW P.D. - REZONING The first public hearing of the evening convened by Chairman Hall was in regard to the request of Molinaro and Associates for a rezoning and planned development for approximately 30 acres presently zoned Agricultural and Planned Development, to a Commercial and Mixed Residential Planned Development located in part of the east half of Section 16, abutting Duckwood Drive to the north, and Pilot Knob Road to the east. Mr. Runkle introduced the proposal, indicating that a Comprehensive .Guide amendment may be necessary and had been properly noticed. He also indicated that the application had been continued several times in recent months and that the application before the Planning Commission consists of 6 lots made up of the 5 lots previously requested north of the pond and deleting the lot south of the pond. The previous proposal had been for a restaurant, hotel, office building, 10 -story apartment, and 41 townhomes. The application had been amended requesting that Lots 3 and 4 allow for the construction of a car care center and general business use. Mr. Runkle advised that only recently, a new use had been proposed for Lot 5, being an Urgicare Center for Fairview Ridges Hospital. It was noted that City Council had expressed an interest in obtaining such a facility for the City and directed staff to try to accommodate such a development. It was also noted that the previous lot 6 south of the pond, had been purchased by a separate developer, Meritor Development Company, and was not a part of this proposal. Mr. Wayne Tauer, engineer representing the developer, indicated that the traffic study had now been completed and that the proposal would have less than a 5% overall traffic impact on the intersections in the Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle area. He indicated that the uses on Lots 1 and 2 had remained the same and that the car care center could be deleted for' Lot 3, with the request that Lots 3 and 4 be allowed as a General Business designation due to the high cost of the purchase of these lots, which included nice single-family.dwellings. He indicated that Lot 5 was to contain the Urgicare Center which is proposed to advance in two phases of construction, including a 12,000 square foot building in the first phase and an addition of 10,000 square feet in the second phase. He also indicated that what had previously been designated at Lot 7 could be elderly housing in conjunction with the medical campus. He requested that Lot 7 not be designated as an outlot unless an indication was made as -to the density to be allowed. No one from the public was present to respond. APC Minutes April 28, 1987 Member McCrea questioned how the deletion of the Meritor property would be handled, and was advised that it could be resolved through the PUD amendment process. In response to the impact of the changed uses on the traffic study, Mr. Colbert indicated that the traffic study did include an assumption for mixed uses, and that any change on traffic impact would be nominal. Member McCrea then inquired as to the agreement with the Ridges Hospital. Mr. Tom O'Connell of BTO Development was present and indicated that he had been negotiating for a site for Fairview, and that a critical stage of negotiation had been• reached and conceptually agreed to approximately at 4:30 that day. He hoped a Purchase Agreement could be drawn the next day. Chairman Hall then asked whether a PUD amendment would be necessary and could be a condition of rezoning. Mr. Keller responded that the approval of the rezoning could be conditioned upon the PUD amendment which in essence was a rezoning. Mr. Hall indicated that the developer could be required to bring each lot back to the staff in regard to its proposed use as the rezoning and planned development were merely a concept plan at this time. Member Trygg questioned whether the proposal was to contain 6 or 7 lots and was advised by the developer that 6 lots were being proposed with a 7th potential lot in control of a separate developer, Meritor Development Company. Mr. Voracek questioned the impact of the Planning Commission's decisions upon negotiations between Fairview and the developer. Ms. Meg Cleary of the Fairview corporate staff, indicated that Fairview was presently recruiting physicians for a facility in Eagan and would find another site if this site was delayed. Mr. Dunn was present and in response to questions, indicated that Lot 7 could be designated as an outlot for elderly housing. In response to Mr. Gustafson's questions in regard to the density conditions proposed, Mr. Keller advised that as a part of the amendment to planned development agreement, such a condition could be agreed upon by the developer and the City. Mr. Hall expressed concern in regard to the general business uses proposed for Lots 3 and 4, in particular the car care center. Mr. Dunn indicated that the staff report suggested that the City Council was concerned about the proposed use and that it could be a restaurant. Mr. Runkle indicated that the Council had been pursuing efforts to find a location for an Urgicare Center and had considered the Pond View site as a potential location. In reviewing the proposed site, the Council then noted the car. care center proposal. Chairman Hall moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning and PUD amendment subject to the first four conditions in the staff report and that Lot 7 be redesignated as Lot 6 with the condition that it contain no more than 108 units of APC Minutes April 28, 1987 residential use if meeting all ordinance requirements. As an additional condition, Lots 3 and 4, if used as General Business, would be restricted to not having high traffic retail such as convenience stores, gas stations, etc. Gustafson, Voracek and Hall voted in favor; Trygg, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. The motion failed to pass. Trygg moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning and PUD amendment and comprehensive guide amendment, subject to the condition that Lot 7, 3, and 4 be designated as Outlots. McCrea and Trygg voted aye; Voracek, Wilkins, Gustafson and Hall voted nay. Wilkins moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning, planned development amendment, and comprehensive guide amendment, subject to the condition that Lot 7 be designated as an outlot without stipulation as to density of residential use and that Lots 3 and 4 be designated as General Business. In addition to the 5 conditions proposed in the staff report. Wilkins voted aye; McCrea, Hall, Voracek, Gustafson and Trygg voted nay. The motion died. :{ Voracek then moved and Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend - approval of the rezoning and planned development and comprehensive guide amendment, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant and owner shall enter into a planned development agreement or amendment to the conditions of the planned development in accordance with the concept plan submitted for the six or seven lots proposed. 2. The overall plan shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Highway Department and the Minnesota Department of Transportation because this project abuts these rights-of-way. 3. A comprehensive plan amendment shall be processed in accordance with the particular use allowed in this plan. 4. Prior to any first phase development, the existing residents of the property shall be in agreement as to how and when the relocation will take place. 5. Lots 3 and 4 shall not be used as convenience retail or motor fuel sales generating a high volume of traffic. 6. The lot designated as Lot 7 shall be platted as an outlot. The motion passed with Hall and Gustafson voting no, and McCrea, Voracek, Wilkins and Trygg voting yes. ,,rte 'ra Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/PRELIMINARY PLAT AND VARIANCE FOR R & B ADDITION F. Rezoning of 2.08 Acres from R-4 to CSC, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot and a Parking Stall Variance for Leroy Rother and Gerald Braun --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on April 28, 1987, to consider applications submitted by Leroy Rother and Gerald Braun to rezone 2.08 acres from R-4 to CSC, a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment from D -III to a commercial status, a preliminary plat entitled R & B Addition and a variance to the number of parking stalls were all considered. The APC is recommending approval of the applications. At the request of the developers, the City Council continued these applications from the May 5, 1987 City Council meeting, until the May 19 meeting, allowing Mr. Rother and Mr. Braun to reanalyze their parking lot layout. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department reports, copies are enclosed on pages CS through. The City staff is coordinating meetings between Federal Land Company and the applicants for R & B Addition in an effort to coordinate the alignment of driveway accesses onto Duckwood Drive. The City is currently awaiting a response and proposal by Federal Land and is hopeful their review will be completed by Tuesday to allow these applications to be further considered by the City Council. It is anticipated that a resolution will be made prior to Tuesday's meeting and a staff update will be provided with the Administrative Agenda on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) rezon- ing from R-4 to CSC, 2) a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment, 3) a preliminary plat for R & B Addition and 4) a variance to the number of parking stalls, if appropriate. Special N ote: On Tuesday, May 12, the City staff met with the developers of the R&B Addition,: Ken Applebaum and Federal Land Company to review the proposed developments and potential future developments in regard to common driveway access onto Duckwood Drive. At that meeting, staff was informed by Federal Land Company that they have not yet completed their revised lay out for the second phase of the shopping center and were not ready to discuss any proposed driveway locations. They indicated strong objections to the City approving this plat with any driveway location that would result in a restrictive constraint on the ultimate development of their parking lot circulation pattern and accesses. Subsequently, based on their schedule, consideration of the preliminary plat for the R&B Addition is recommended to be continued until the June 2 meeting to allow the property owners and City staff to pursue further acceptable locations for the limited driveway accesses that will be allowed onto Duckwood Drive. The City has also requested a traffic consultant to provide recommendations on proper spacing based on traffic generations and projected volumes,,on Duckwood Drive. A/— CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, VARIANCE, PRELIMINARY PLAT (R & B ADDITION) APPLICANT: LEROY ROTHER AND GERALD BRAUN LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECTION 15 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 28, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of 2.08 R-4 (multiple) acres to a CSC (community shopping center) district and a preliminary plat for the R & B Addition. This plat consists of one lot and a 12,000 S.F. building with two tenants. The November, 1986 Land Use Map designates this area D -III, mixed residential, (3-6 units/acre), therefore,an amendment will be necessary. SITE PLAN: Currently, the site is vacant and flat along Duckwood Avenue. The rear portion rises quickly to a wooded knoll nearly 20' above street grade. Across Duckwood Drive to the north and east is the Town Centre 70 8th Addition (CSC). Unplatted (CSC) land is to the west and undeveloped property along with the Hidden Oaks Townhomes are to the south - separated from this plat by the mature trees on both sides of the property line. The building coverage is 13% gross area, 17% net area and 30% is permitted. All building and parking setbacks conform to Code requirements. The 12,000 S.F. building occupied by Simik's Meats (3,360 S.F.) and Hardware Hank (8,640 S.F.) would share parking and a single loading dock on the back of the building. Code requires 80 10' wide parking stalls for a building this size - 59 have been provided (1:150 up to the first 20,000 S.F.). Since on site proof of 21 stalls cannot be demonstrated with this layout, a variance will be needed to allow the proposed number. The loading area will be screened from the south by the grade change alone. A three tiered wall will be constructed along the southern property line of the area between levels is large enough for planting, maintenance free material should be used. A final landscape plan on a grading plan will be required with the final plat submission. It must be compatible with the sizes, amount and species of the adjacent commercial properties. Possible trash locations should be determined prior to the final building design as should any mounted signage since no pylon has been requested at this time. GRADING/DRAINAGE: This two -acre development located on the south e side of Duckwood Drive just east of Denmark Avenue is proposed to be tucked into the heavily wooded side hill on the south side adjacent to the condominimum townhouse complexes. From the top of the hill on the south to the bottom of the pond on the east, there is a 28' elevation differential. The grading plan proposes to construct a 15' high terraced retaining wall along the south side removing a substantial portion of this side hill and its related vegetation. The grading plan also proposes to complete the development of the south half of Pond JP -67 adjacent to Duckwood Drive in the eastern corner to accommodate the City's storm sewer requirements. This development would involve the installation of a semi -recessed loading dock on the south end of the building. The resulting 10% cross slope grade of this southerly service road is not feasible or acceptable. To obtain an acceptable 2% cross slope would add another 1-2' to the height of the retaining wall. Due to the inadequate preliminary design of the overall drainage plan submitted with this application, extensive engineering reviews had to be performed to ensure continuity for the existing drainage patterns in addition to handling the runoff generated from this development. Subsequently, instead of performing a conceptual review, staff had to actually design this system on behalf of the developer. These results indicate additional storm sewer facilities being required to handle both the internal and external drainage as it affects the development of this property and its proper discharge into the City pond on the east end. The drainage system as proposed with this application is inadequate and unacceptable without incorporating the preliminary design of he City's review. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water service of sufficient size and elevation is immediately available within Duckwood Drive to provide service to this proposed development. The existing 6" water lateral stub from Duckwood Drive will have to be extended to the west property line to be continued with further development to the west providing for proper looping. The size of the individual water services to the building will be reviewed as a part of the building permit application process. STREETS/CIRCULATION: This application proposes to construct only half of the required common driving aisle along the west property line. This is inadequate for proper traffic circulation. Either the entire driving aisle should be contained within this development or adequate easements should be obtained to allow the construction of the full driving aisle width along the west property line. The two driveway access points to Duckwood Drive are not acceptable or compatible with proposed driveways on the north side of Duckwood Drive or the common internal cross easement driving aisle through the property to the west. The access drive at the northern most point of the property should be eliminated and relocated, approximately 160' to the south opposite the proposed major entrance into the Town Centre 70 8th Addition development and constructed at a minimum 30' width dimension to provide for the required cross traffic movement from the west. Also, the southerly most driveway should be eliminated and consolidated into this singular major driveway access. This will require a redesign of the internal traffic circulation and parkin t configuration which should then / l e�, be further reviewed by staff to ensure proper internal circulation for customers, employees and delivery vehicles. All other minor access drives should be constructed to a minimum 24' width. Also, the comprehensive trail system requires a trailway along the south side of Duckwood Drive across this development. ASSESSMENTS: This development was previously assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer, trunk water, lateral benefit from.trunk water main and street improvements for the existing Duckwood Drive. However, all previous assessments were levied at the single-family or multiple residential rate and not at the proposed commercial. rate. This property has not yet been assessed for trunk area storm sewer. In addition to this unlevied assessment, this development will be responsible for the upgrading of previous assessments to its proposed commercial use. These are defined as follows: Item Trunk Area Water (Upgrade) Duckwood Dr. Street (Upgrade) Lat. Benefit from Trunk Water Main (Upgrade) Trunk Area Storm Sewer Qty. Rate Amount Proj. # 1.58 ac $1,920/ac* $3,029 58 363.16 ft 15.84/ff* 5,752 429 363.16 ft 8.08/lf* 2,934 429 68,721 sf 0.079/sf 5,429 429 Total $17,144 Rate reflects difference between commercial and residential rates. Final assessment obligations will be based on final quantities defined in the final plat and will be based on the rates in effect at the time of final plat application. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: A 44' half right-of-way must be dedicated for the existing Duckwood Drive. Adequate easements for the ponding area has previously been conveyed to the City in the eastern corner of this development. There are no outside .agency permits anticipated as a requirement of this development approval. R & B CONDITIONS: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. A variance to allow 59 parking stalls shall be approved. 3. A landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat submission compatible in sizes and species with the adjacent commercial properties. The financial guarantee shall not be released until after one year from the date of installation. The SE portion of the parking lot shall be suitably screened from the residential land to the south. 4. This plat shall adhere to all applicable Sign Ordinances. 5. No rooftop fan units shall be visable. 6. The trash enclosure (s) must be located next to or within the building and approved by the Fire Marshall. No perimeter trash enclosure will be allowed. 7. No exterior storage shall be permitted. 8. All four sides of the building shall be constructed of the same materials. 9. Shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 10. The two proposed driveway connections shall be consolidated into one major access approximately 160' southeast of the northern most corner. A 30' cross easement and driving aisle shall be dedicated from this major driveway access to the westerly property line. 11. The ponding area in the southeast corner shall be constructed to provide the required storage volume in accordance with the Comprehensive Storm Sewer system. 12. This development shall provide an internal storm sewer system to handle the onsite runoff and the drainage from the west and discharge it into the ponding area in the east corner. If any portion of this project is to be performed under City contract, the project must be authorized by Council action prior to final plat approval. 13. The internal traffic circulation and parking lot layout shall incorporate the minimum 24' driving aisle width with concrete curb and gutter perimeters, especially in those areas where it encroaches on adjacent private property. 14. A revised grading plan shall be submitted providing proper cross slopes and parking lot grades within the service road on the west and south side of the facility. 15. This development shall accept its financial obligations pertaining to additional and upgraded special assessments. 16. This development shall extend the 6" water lateral to the west property line for continuation of service. 17. This development shall be responsible for the installation of an 8' bituminous trail along Duckwood Drive. Of` i m m R' ;I y 0 0! p>� mo0 !I °c m Iz m A :1 s" 1 I 1 I — B -CARs I I I �� I o MFq T x �3 Mq a so s.R�fFT 1 I ' yR 9,CARS ; - ..'fir I � I c•D 1' - ; s;CARs` i I I f a I I• I I 9,CARS ; - ..'fir i c•D ��-..-, - f Z K m -D co Om m co O�Om m mo rv-im� NN --IN m(n ZZ>> Z N z z m m Om L) 17DD u,10M0) O N cn I m 0 O n A ti 03 O N m O i CA C/) N 5D T 'T1 71 /,=;z C) 1 // co o� ,X 0 ..'fir c•D ��-..-, - s gh 0 41 0w -'•a. fll •� G1 9 z .\ s '.a it .t i 1 I i' Illilrll ',F� ' � � - // 1 �, ,11'1 l 1 I l\ �, �'� ::� •� �' i • � -'`' ' / ' / 1 IT art ,I s,kFrl — —• ��-i!-- • i I f t f `•, ' ' � ;, it z v Rl ZZ pyo Z a C) !7 f r t j� v M r0 O z z I' z :eep. F E � 'ill is -it m m ii �F.� ►ie� rr e�tl E icl F. r -G jt- Fir, It,! -z wo 2 z� I. b / ;; ' I I / O D r—,-< o / v i CCU O i naa mD ._ :c m M/ 74.0 /6,V 12 I Imo? 11 7 '0 7 4 0 '0" r6 loll QP 15 FOX 46 �3/6, 404 RIDGE I.ij�9 i.0 57.9/73-0 46.3/62.0 40.4/ t7 41.9/60.0 61.5/80.0 2011 7rar'!'.1kil 1(�D -1. 21M D00110LAD 3RD A6ENT SUF E.? EN JINI�L At TL�NT > - ------ ( iku? �— . 1 4-);? K� SITE dTH. ADD/J 4, TO HEIGH,rs 2 kG. D, x P jBLIC fo 7. 5 . 2/ 703T% 2ND n.fc- f D CGI ADDITION 6 6 811 55,/,7'aT" '.3V7XICOT KNOB 84 2 03- '2411 8.1 A3 Or 311 KWOOD 4 RAILS 8 4-1. C, I DO 3 P 30" 8 4 .9 43.3/1 100 ry) 84.7 98.0 IYK... . .... .. . .. . .......... 78J/96.0 CITY HALL L 1K 4 K /� % � goo ,.0 7 �,, t 17, : , c A I y of eagan PUBLIC 2 f WORKS - IZOAM I in TME 1-69.0 S �4L-- % %811 50.3/E 0 IT - 12' .1 181 -�FSIOTJ 53.2/68. -5 0-4 :X81.0 1611 am dmsm CD 54.6/. AD -1--NO. 21611 CD 5 3.1 59.9/7x5. 59.8/76. ef,78) 51.4 SUBJECT PARCEL P A M A M Lill I lully FIG. --1k _q approved standard plate #: ---- WATER MASTER PLAN Om Ic--?3 'U R rif Y Sed IIAROENS 24""C L HTS C Ls _P I 825.0/ zee OP Cz, JP -2 844.0 85/.5 r — 44 47 855.4 1 4 -4 0"�' . DP V_at�o� I . D -2 7 2 874 , 8 1 1874.8 L.S.-7 1 7 C,008L8 to a 79'qOAD l.. e yi, _EL_ Pt _j I ::-�w -fwz;QP -1 P0 L 8Z.0 D 7/ T jF,('�' DP -20 D -r -- ff, 60. 0 81 901.0 T0.11A - 8; 11>1 0 904.2 011 OP -i 23 DP -1 14�1 88?.� AQD1 2- 89'0 89�* 6 EA Y PARK 8 D -w CAR 1, H 12" dr G Qr�Ul 8 890.0 - kt7, 882 1 9z "ix L �Xl N 8800,1 rlllk�i ci- \ .92.� FIS' jp JP -5 823,8 8341 0 CITY - - I -BP-2'8 8 6 2.6 T_ 668.0 5�OVD 1. _L B - 48 b P 3" 732, ! =1N - L-970.6 'j 71 �.��4-9015 JP -6— 893.0 'W8973-, 895.5 '>jP-46 N _T T ------- . ...... JP -63=' _.." J 'jP-11 815.7 899.7:, -90 XT 0. 73 di) '13" 44' 830.0 8907 lt3ld3 4 LAt .7 S?Ot-r., ROAD/i 4 -b' -L T'T't TON, jp- 820.8 ADD. 830.0 J_f SQUARE =4 T P - 9 818.1 .._...---- 830.0 0 . . ...... 830.036" �-� NC 14, �g%74PATCH � 27 4. 12 863"i _dd J - UBJECT PARCEL R & B ADDITION FIG. +V_'. city of eagan approved: standard EDPUBLIC STORM SEWER plate #: WORKS DEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN- STORM SEWER TRUNK APEA-,,68i721 sq ft . ............. TRAILWAY 363.16' DUCKWOOD DRIVE UPGRADE -.:363.16' rl r 0 Z m m moca ITjC 0 to m x mo ni Z-4 Z 0 0 U) V Z N N T4 0 0 > > N z z m m M C) G)> > 3 CD CD NI CD 0 (Do Cl) 0 0 to :n Ln ii Non STORM SEWER TRUNK APEA-,,68i721 sq ft . ............. TRAILWAY 363.16' DUCKWOOD DRIVE UPGRADE -.:363.16' rl .......... ........... ....... WATER AREA 1.58 Ac ............. ... 363.16' ra Em M WATER LATERAL UPGRADE APC Minutes April 28, 1987 R & B ADDITION - REZONING, COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT VARIANCE & PRELIMINARY PLAT The applications of LeRoy Rother and Gerald Braun for rezoning of 2.08 acres from R-4 (Multiple Residential) to CSC (Community Shopping Center) and a preliminary plat for R & B Addition, was the subject of the next public hearing convened by Chairman Hall. This plat is to consist of one lot and a 12,000 square foot building with two tenants. Mr. Runkle presented the application, which involved a small triangle of land left out of the previous rezoning of the property to the north and west, in conjunction with the relocation of Duckwood Drive. Both the property to the west and the north were anticipated to be developed as CSC with townhomes to the south. The proposal had 13% lot coverage, less than the required parking but more than these existing businesses had had in the past. Mr. Wally Trost was present to represent Mr. Rother and Mr. Braun and discussion centered around the proper access to Duckwood Drive. Mr. Steve Knutson of Hidden Oaks Homeowners Association raised questions as to the barrier presented by the hill and woods between the two properties. It appeared that the hill between the building and the existing townhomes was 28 feet in height from the proposed building pad level. Mr. Colbert advised the Commission that there was a problem with the location of access, due to the need to locate the access for the major shopping center development to the north, in order to impede traffic as little as possible. Staff preference was for the two entrances to be aligned at an intersection since the major shopping center has already been submitted, it would eliminate a right -turn movement, and avoid an extra access. It was indicated that this proposal was merely a portion of a larger section that failed to be rezoned when the realignment of Duckwood Drive was being considered. McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend rezoning and Comprehensive Guide •amendment in order to "clean up" the remainder parcel left because of the realignment of Duckwood Drive and the ponding which has now been defined. All voted in favor. McCrea moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend preliminary plat approval and a variance to the parking stall requirement, subject to the following conditions: 1. All. standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. A variance to allow 59 parking stalls shall be approved. APC Minutes April 28, 1987 3. A landscape plan shall be submitted with the final plat submission compatible in sizes and species with the adjacent commercial properties. The financial guarantee shall not be released until after one year from the date of installation. The southeast portion of the parking lot shall be suitably screened from the residential land to the south. 4. This plat shall adhere to all applicable Sign Ordinances. 5. No rooftop fan units shall be visable. 6. The trash enclosure(s) must be located next to or within the building and approved by the Fire Marshall. No perimeter trash enclosure will be allowed. 7. No exterior storage shall be permitted. 8. All four sides of the building shall be constructed of the same materials. 9. The plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 10. The two proposed driveway connections shall be consolidated into one major access approximately 160 feet southeast of the 1 northern most corner. A 30 foot cross easement and driving aisle shall be dedicated from this major driveway access to the westerly property line. 11. The ponding area in the southeast corner shall be constructed to provide the required storage volume in accordance with the Comprehensive storm sewer system. 12. This development shall provide an internal storm sewer system to handle the onsite runoff and the drainage from the west and discharge it into the ponding area in the east corner. If any portion of this project is to be performed under City contract, the project must be authorized by Council action prior to final plat approval. 13. The internal traffic circulation and parking lot layout shall incorporate the minimum 24 foot driving aisle width with concrete curb and gutter perimeters, especially in those areas where it encroaches on adjacent private property. 14. A revised grading plan shall be submitted providing proper cross slopes and parking lot grades within the service road on the west and south side of the facility. 15. This development shall accept its financial obligations pertaining to additional and upgraded special assessments. =S�Ti' APC Minutes April 28, 1987 16. This development shall extend the 6 inch water lateral to the west property line for continuation of service. 17. This development shall be responsible for the installation of an 8 foot bituminous trail along Duckwood Drive. 18. The developer, Mr. Applebaum and the Colon brothers, shall meet with City staff to determine the best access location prior to the City Council meeting, which for this proposal shall be May 19, 1987, in order to provide for time. 19. Staff shall meet with the neighbors to the south to discuss the plantings and screening between the two developments. All voted affirmatively. BLUE RIDGE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The last public hearing convened by to the application of L. A. Laukka D, plat of B ue Ridge Addition which will bi F of Lonek Addition, into a 9.8 acre and two out is containing 37.25 acres , west, with Lont-11Oak Road to the south. application indi ating that proof of p, to the slight s ortage being proposed. requested in an aa designated Light allowed. It was in icated that the Silver Bell Center �cloposal and that ,a suggested that the accb,.,;� ses off Lone Chairman Halla in regard velopment for a reliminary a replat of tlots E and lot for an,. ffice/showroom butting Highway #149 to the Mr. Ruprkle presented the rking,.,taould be provided due 21 lot coverage was being dustrial where 35% is oposal was similar to the traffic study done in-house Oak Road were too close together. Mr. Dale Beck of BRW as present and discussed green space, utilities, parking, and land caping. He indicated Mr. Rick Berger of Laukka-Beck was also pres t Mr. Beck suggested that due to the curvature in the road, the raff report was in error in regard to the distance between th two a cesses. He indicated he would request approval subjec_ to sta f review regarding the traffic safety issues. An owne,( across the \road from the property was present and indicatedAis approval. McCrea moved, Vilkins seconded the mot.. on to recommend approval of the preliminar,�( plat, subject to the foll wing conditions: 1. All standard plat conditions shall be ahered to. 2. No flan units shall be visable. 3. A Zandscape planting plan shall be required with the final plat submission. The financial guarantee shall not be released until after one year from the date of installation. Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three PRELIMINARY PLAT/BLUE RIDGE ADDITION G. Preliminary Plat of Outlots E and F of the Lone.Oak Addition into a 9.8 Acre Lot for an Office Showroom and Two Outlots Contain- ing 37.25 Acres --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on April 28, 1987, to consider a preliminary plat entitled Blue Ridge Addition, presented by L.A. Laukka Development that would replat Outlots E and F of the Lone Oak Addition into a 9.8 acre lot for an office/showroom and two (2) outlots containing 37.25 acres. The APC is recommending approval. The City Council at its May 5, 1987 meeting, recommended continuance of this item until the May 19 meeting, allowing for additional review and consideration of traffic analysis reports that were performed independently by BRW for the developer and Stgar Roscoe on behalf of the City of Eagan. Enclosed on pages P through LTL is a copy of the Planning and Engineering Department reports on this item. Also enclosed on pages L�,IS through lq2 is a copy of a letter that was received from legal counsel representing Northwest Orient Airlines regarding the traffic study. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled Blue Ridge Addition as presented. Special Note: On Tuesday, May 12, City staff met with representatives of the proposed Blue Ridge development to discuss the proposed driveway access onto Lone Oak Parkway and the resultant in the existing center median. While the original traffic review indicated that the access should be located further the west, resulting modifications to the original design concept will comply with City standards and are acceptable by the developer. It is anticipated these revised configurations will be available during their presentation on May 19. /00 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (BLUE RIDGE ADDITION) APPLICANT: L.A. LAURRA DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: SW 1/4, SECTION 1 EXISTING ZONING: P.D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 28, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 20, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat for the Blue Ridge Addition. This plat will replat Outlots E and F of the Lone Oak Addition into a 9.8 acre lot for an office/showroom and two outlots containing 37.25 acres abutting Highway 149 to the west with Lone Oak Road to the south. The Planned Development Agreement designates this area: office, office - showroom or research and development. No amendment should be necessary. The breakdown. of the building will be 60% office, 20% light manufacturing or assembly and 20% wholesale/warehousing. The entire building is 90,000 S.F. BUILDING/SITE PLAN: The building is very similar to the Silver Bell Plaza along Highway 13. This one story building will have a truck loading area on the interior portion with access to Lone Oak Parkway is provided near the NE corner of the plat. All building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements. The applicant is proposing 9' width stalls. Given the proposed building uses, 393 stalls will be required. 324 have been provided. A separate drawing for proof of parking shows 452 spaces. The floor area ratio (lot coverage) is 21%. Phase 3-4 of the P.D. exhibit (proposed Lot 1 and the area directly south) were designated for 100,000 S.F. office and 43,000 S.F. retail on 73.9 acres. The proposed building will be constructed of dry vit, a material similar to stucco, along the top of the building, interrupted brick facing and dark green reflective glass and a 2' berm to the grade level. No fan units are being shown on the elevations/sections. Therefore, it appears that the parapet wall will be tall enough to screen them. The preliminary landscape plan works well conceptually on all sides. A utility easement runs along Highway 149 and modifications in plant material selections may be necessary in order to not interfere with those utilities. Parking lot screening will still be required. C GRADING/DRAINAGE: The proposed site was graded as part of the Lone Oak Addition. The site gently slopes from Lone Oak Parkway towards State Trunk Highway 149. A preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was not submitted with the preliminary plat application. The site is proposed to be drained through two separate storm sewer systems. The northerly part of the site (approximately. 2.2 acres) is intended to drain by storm sewer into the existing storm sewer in Lone Oak Parkway. This existing storm sewer has sufficient capacity for this drainage area. The southerly portion of the site (approximately 7.6 acres) will drain by storm sewer into a future storm sewer by others designated as trunk on the plans. It is assumed for purpose of this report that the trunk storm sewer by others will convey the drainage to Pond FP -7. However, the plans don't provide information regarding the trunk storm sewer by others relative to its size and alignment. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size and depth to serve this site are readily available along Trunk Highway 149 and Lone Oak Parkway. One 8" service is proposed from the existing sanitary sewer in Trunk Highway 149 and the other is proposed from the existing sanitary sewer in Lone Oak Parkway. The site will be served by the existing 12" water main in Trunk Highway 149 and Lone Oak Parkway. Also shown is a proposed 8" water main loop along the south side of the site connecting the existing 12" water main in Trunk Highway 149 to the existing 12" water main in Lone Oak Parkway. Hydrants are shown and it is recommended that two additional hydrants be provided along Trunk Highway 149 on the north and south side of the building. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this site is proposed from Lone Oak Parkway in two different locations. The northerly entrance is proposed as a right in - right out entrance only. The southerly entrance is shown entering into Outlot A. The City contracted to have an independent traffic consultant study the traffic circulation along Lone Oak Parkway. The results of the study recommend moving the major access to the proposed development approximately 230 ffet west of where currently proposed. The site will have to be redesigned in accordance with this recommendation. M ASSESSMENTS: The parcels that make up this proposed development have been assessed in the following manner: Project # Description Usage 12 Sanitary Sewer Trunk - 12 Water Area C/I 12 (A) Water Area C/I 302 Storm Sewer Trunk C/I 302 (B) Storm Sewer Trunk Multi (A) Parcel #10-00200-010-75 864 acres (3.27 X .8) assessed. (B) Parcel #10-00200-020-75 assessed @ multi PENDING ASSESSMENTS: None PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments are proposed as a condition of final plat approval: Project # Description Usage Rate Qty. Amount 12 (1) Water Area C/I 3,170/Ac 1/3 Ac $1,057 12 (2) Add'l. Water Area C/I 3,170/Ac 1.72 Ac 5,444 $6,501 (1) Area east of the section line i.e. amount that is in Section 1 (2) Balance 10-00200-010-75 which was not previously fully assessed for water area The above assessments are for only those areas going to Lot 1 of the proposed Blue Ridge Addition. In addition, there are additional assessments due on Outlot B when that develops.. 125,000 S.F. of Outlot B, that which was 10-00200- 020-75 was assessed storm sewer trunk at the multi residential rate. The portion of Outlot B that is the remainder of 10-00200-010-75 has an additional obligation for water area that is approximately 1.98 acres. The final assessment rates shall be those in effect at the time of final plat approval based on final plat area and frontage calculations. BLUE RIDGE CONDITIONS: 1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 2. No fan units shall be usable. 3. A landscape planting plan will be required with the final plat submission. The financial guarantee shall not be released until after one year from the date of installation. 4. 9' wide parking stalls shall be approved. 5. A lighting plan shall be submitted. No direct light source shall be visable from Highway 149 or the public streets. 6. Shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 7. The developer shall submit an approved retaining wall design prior to final plat approval. 8. The "storm sewer trunk by others" shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City standards prior to final plat approval. 9. The developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of the internal storm sewer system. 10. The developer shall submit an acceptable erosion/sediment control plan prior to final plat approval. 11. The 8" water main along the easterly side of the development shall be located within Outlot A. 12. A 20 foot utility easement shall be provided for the proposed 8" water main along the southerly side of Lot 1. 13. Two additional hydrants shall be located along the north and south side of the proposed building. 14. The development shall move its major access point approximately 230 west of where currently proposed. 15. The proposed development shall be responsible for obtaining the appropriate Department of Health permit for water main extensions. 16. The development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary down stream ponding easements. 17. Noafan units shall be visable. 18. A landscape planting plan will be required with the final plat submission. The financial guarantee shall not be released until after one year from the date of installation. ` 19• 9' wide parking stalls shall be approved. 20. A lighting plan shall be submitted. No direct light source shall be visable from Highway 149 or the public streets. Shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. — 113 l J/Ij ��O 1 'fir �•' it (I I � �-'" ��t ::..• t_•, _v i \%ice•%� r ` ^� ! 1-- T,!,;r CL F any�,-- � - ' �`• _ : 'a 111 � :�"r' -•;: •':,- o, q,^ LJ FT; 177 !�. 11-1, .• m�,"� W'�N`m 1 1 ■ !:r '_aL, e 4_ i i!3 a -' =a LLJ .( I' I ••111 I I _ �•�� � �� cc Vv � � fin. a--• 471 10, 4 � I I ,` •' 'r� �; � - :. _ 644 LL _ W P,'' ur , w3� �O,cg' �� < <im < < � aaaar� oaaaa aaaad aaaap� a aaaae �F^- — --- A ;•^� acuE• JI N p d a z N V > < 3 /}f —� O - 3 I N CV cu U N 3 Y J g u ;moo- ;mos- ;ase ' IN Lal1 a cu ILL.J Q =o 471 10, 4 � I I ,` •' 'r� �; � - :. _ 644 D LL _ W P,'' ur , w3� �O,cg' off, ... •. D LL ooL$- w3� .a C- W U N 4 a! �''•ai'1L:.. J Q Q n lC O H O (11 LL G cC.)u. O' N v r cr cc _ Of'f n c O m Q O 9 :I d a N vi N W N e G �• - y N J J ° O W • a Y N Q m 0 CC ` 1 O O J J c e l A a, OJ O O d O O O i / C- .....,{`...........fir' ... e`�MU I I1 cc W Il6�ilt I I' i' Ox WA59Na7 WVV" 3NO 3SVHd )IVO 3NOl NV -1d BUS NOISN3WIO i• V.. I O CM wo aY� Q D Q ¢<a O N �O iz a 4,,54- 37) 6j- N n�.. x� •u.ou •xx..�•-. - • xa o 3wnar rix..Yxl ♦o •• .rr •alisiior •iio Yox.r v ra• `JNitl33Ni0N3 Q DNWN tlOd5NVtl1 7NINNY Id N vlosarwiw NvOIG 3N0 3SVHd NVO 9NO-1 - J } �= 3� 3 •7 � '. r w a°�_Sa��� w ff S :sir,; Q _ Q •�• �{,1�fS E � Ir �1�! !!! .1 ilf!�M 1 1 w , 3 Wz NH'Id 3dVOSaNd 1 � J W �`ilER 3"h's'c�1 Z lxi a: 5= ~ :i 3 •Sys 1 R E e L F A O O O V O N N m 0 b Y ! GRADING AND DRAINAGE LONE OAK PHASE ONE zLn EAGAN, MINNESOTA p1 3 mPLANNING ry TRANSPORTATION p rll [SSSi�i�J �Oi IMI' ENGINEERING Z fff L' Y ARCNITECTORE 1 i LM NN[TT, Ill :�i o{e, ww�nn...... I`. p....... l.o. 0 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN Z02` iIt m I 1 h LONE OAK PHASE ONE EAGAN, MINNESOTA N PUNNING TRJNSOORIATION 0 ENGINEERING z ARL NiTEGfURE P,•i� •wrT Yr n[a �C rhIIL10 •lLO. J•r•e•, 0••Gr!•'I N •1. •., r •lO II •, r• • _ C: a a Z: WATER AREA 0.33 AC. ADDITIONAL WATER AREA 1.72 AC NW COr. 01 SW 1/4,SW 1/4 SOC. 1, T 27. R 23 .s a9'40'15'W xz� 0.90 a9'2444')Y ft W _�,- M------_ _ ------------�--- ;- --IVE — T TFNTfSTN 494 I-494 DITOR S31 (I z 23.3%50.(, 39. 7.0 811 KOC L'O6K1'S e _9�jrss.o 5 t l 16 )� IL T �� 6 1611 --_- — -- e• .4901211 , `r 57.4/ 85.0 18. !43.j17� .0LEX PARK V i osill 'u �/ EAGANDA 5.8/80.0 II 71.5/9V DIE T AL K........ I2 `. r7s.�O szb 71.2 o "� LO. 15 AK gIROA 14 ' ,1 _ ..... 11 IY� wr 16 �., - 16 ! n x 26 I _ '2.4/85.0 10 50.0/76.0 1611 ! ' • �� AUDITORS j 10 �Ep - 92.i lj`� S SIAIE 18" . 6At fif: ! �i 'T r "i f I I�-. r Is"sT �5 112"''• ` ` S r o Y # 55 \ ., _.—. 52 513 54 i II i� I v F 51.2/7 .0 675/91.0 670f SILleg 1 - NO. 38 u 51 2.3 77. \� 1 u ACRESILI ' '`'rc'•; i 8 � :EBUR OA ;1 ---- 50.3/75.0 I i i I -- f% �' •.` \ }PARKJll 4g -r i --.... �� 16 f \ 24� _'= - <_UTH DEI -'A /I +A,II�I},T'l1m. HILLS i8 N­ 72.0 �� 72 51,47 .0 1-'- 7 u 56.4/76.0 ','l '�r:,•_� , 61.5/8.0.0 676/86.0 , 49.6/66.0 7.5/43.0 20.°---------- iter. A » 2R 18" 20"c..._.._._ . 1�`'J2d' 63 z4u 62 4' PHEfi E�lGd BLUE RIDGE ADD. SUBJECT PARCEL FIG.3 city of eagan WATER approved standard PUBLIC plate #: WORKS co D PARTMEN MASTER PLA — 1 N /7 APC Minutes April 28, 1987 16. This development shall extend the 6 inch water lateral to the west property line for continuation of service. 17. This development shall be responsible for the installation of an 8 foot bituminous trail along Duckwood Drive. 18. The developer, Mr. Applebaum and the Colon brothers, shall meet with City staff to determine the best access location prior to the City Council meeting, which for this proposal shall be May 19, 1987, in order to provide for time. 19. Staff shall meet with the neighbors to the south to discuss the plantings and screening between the two developments. All voted affirmatively. BLUE RIDGE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The•last public hearing convened by Chairman Hall was in regard to the application of L. A. Laukka Development for a preliminary plat of Blue Ridge Addition which will be a replat of Outlots E and F of Lone Oak Addition, into a 9.8 acre lot for an office/showroom and two outlots containing 37.25 acres abutting Highway #149 to the west, with Lone Oak Road to the south. Mr. Runkle presented the application indicating that proof of parking would be provided due to the slight shortage being proposed. 21% lot coverage was being requested in an area designated Light Industrial where 35% is allowed. It was indicated that the proposal was similar to the Silver Bell Center proposal and that a traffic study done in-house suggested that the accesses off Lone Oak Road were too close together. Mr. Dale Beck of BR4++T was present and discussed green space, utilities, parking, and landscaping. He indicated Mr. Rick Berger of Laukka-Beck was also present. Mr. Beck suggested that due to the curvature in the road, the traffic report was in error in regard to the distance between the two accesses. He indicated he would request approval subject to staff review regarding the traffic safety issues. An owner across the road from the property was present and indicated his approval. McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 2. No fan units shall be visable. 3. A landscape planting plan shall be required with the final plat submission. The financial guarantee shall not be released until after one year from the date of installation. APC Minutes April 28, 1987 4. 9 foot wide parking stalls shall be approved. 5. A lighting plan shall be submitted. No direct light source shall be visable from Highway #149 or the public streets. 6. The plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 7. The developer shall submit an approved retaining wall design prior to final plat approval. 8. The "storm sewer trunk by others" shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City standards prior to issuance of any building permits. 9. The developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of the internal storm sewer system. 10. The developer shall submit an acceptable erosion/sediment control plan prior to final plat approval. 11. The 8 inch water main along the easterly side of the development shall be located within Outlot A. 12. A 20 foot utility easement shall be provided for the proposed 8 inch water main along the southerly side of Lot 1. 13. Two additional hydrants shall be located along the north and south side of the proposed building. 14. The development shall move its major access point approximately 230 feet west of where currently proposed. 15. The proposed development shall be responsible for obtaining the appropriate Department of Health permit for water main extensions. 16. The development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary down stream ponding easements. 17. The developer shall work with City staff to resolve the access issue. This item shall be considered at the May 19, 1987 council meeting to allow discussion between developer and staff. All voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Wilkins moved, McCrea seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 12:00 midnight. All voted in favor. DGK Secretary - APC( /l� B. C'HART PHILIP L. BRUNER TIMOTHY M. O'BRIEN DENNIS M. COYNE JAMES W. LITTLEFIELD STEVEN Z. KAPLAN SUE HALVERSON TIMOTHY R. THORNTON STEPHEN L. WILSON NILS F GROSSMAN JAMES F. MEWBORN BARBARA JEAN EYAQUILA PATRICK J. O'CONNOR, JR. PETER C. HALLS EINAR E. HANSON PETER E. HAPKE PAUL T. MEYER THOMAS J. VOLLBRECHT LAW OFFICES HART, BRUNER, O'BRIEN & THORNTON PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 1221 NICOLLET MALL, SUITE 700 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403 May 5, 1987 City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Wacovia Board Item City Council Meeting of May 19, 1987 Dear Chairman and City Council Members: TELEPHONE (612) 332-1431 TELECOPIER (612) 332-7221 HAND DELIVERED Our office represents NWA, Inc. (the parent company of Northwest Airlines). We have been working with the City regarding development of Northwest's World headquarters site in Eagan. At the urging of the City staff, Northwest is studying the traffic impacts of its proposed development, taking into consideration the development plans of Wacovia and Cray Research. Northwest has hired a -traffic consultant and is spending significant time and resources to address traffic issues. Northwest is generally aware that Cray Research is proposing a master plan for development of its parcel. We were not specifically aware that Cray had actually submitted a master plan for review by City staff and we were surprised today to learn that City staff had met on May 3 with representatives of Cray Research regarding their proposed development plans. A copy of Cray's submittal to the City has,not been provided to us, so we have asked the attorney for Cray Research to provide us a copy of the submission. Obviously, Northwest should.be kept informed as to the development plans of Cray Research and Wacovia. Only with timely notice by the City staff of proposed development plans can Northwest be informed and be in a position to answer the comprehensive traffic questions that the City staff has asked Northwest to consider. HART, BRUNER, O'BRIEN & THORNTON City Council May 5, 1987 Page 2 In the course of conversations today with City staff, we learned for the first time that Wacovia has been to the City Planning Commission and received approval of plans for a warehouse and office space. Apparently, Wacovia has not been asked to address the traffic impacts associated with this proposed development, other than the roadway alignments and other such engineering details. Wacovia should not be given approval for the development of its warehouse and office plans, without being directed to cooperate with Northwest and Cray Research in an overall assessment of traffic demands for the entire site. Northwest remains ready to address the traffic impacts of its proposed development and to do so in the context of the development plans of Cray Research and Wacovia. It is fundamentally unfair, however, for the City staff to require only Northwest to make such a comprehensive assessment of traffic impacts. Wacovia and Cray should also be directed to address traffic impacts and to cooperate with Northwest in the overall assessment. Northwest specifically asked the City Council to do the following: 1. As a special condition of any plans by Wacovia for warehouse and office space, require Wacovia to assess the traffic impacts associated with all its development plans and to do so in cooperation with Northwest and Cray Research. 2. Provide written notice to Northwest of any and all submittals to the City staff regarding development plans by Cray Research and Wacovia, or any other developer on the Laukka-Beck tract, and provide Northwest with an opportunity to participate in the review and comment of all proposed plans. Northwest asks to be treated fairly and to be given timely notice of development plans for the entire Laukka-Beck tract. Iq(a HART, BRUNER, O'BRIEN & THORNTON City Council May 5, 1987 Page 3 Northwest should only be asked to study traffic impacts, if Cray Research and Wacovia have been asked to do the same. TRT:llh cc: S. Schwanke S. Wheeler J. Shardlow Sincerely, Timothy R. Thornton Iq' Agenda Information Memo May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four GAMBLING LICENSE/PULL-TABS AT RICHARDS FOOD AND LIQUOR A. Gambling License for Pull -Tabs at Richards Food and Liquor for St. Joseph's Home for Children --The City has received a request from St. Joseph's Home for Children which is located in Minneapolis for a charitable gambling license at Richard's Food and Liquor. The proceeds for this program will benefit St. Joseph's Home for Children, an agency of Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis. The applicant was made aware of the required ratio of local versus national charitable gambling licenses for pull -tabs. It is stated in the body of the proposal that "256 of our members who contribute to the support of St. Joseph's are Eagan residents" and further that "we have staff and volunteers in our programs who live in Eagan. Presently, the City has one local gambling license which is the Eagan Lion's Club for pull -tabs at Cedarvale Lanes and there is a national organization, the MS Society, that has pull -tabs at Valley Lounge. The City has recently denied City of Hope at Richard's Food and Liquor and Camp New Hope at the Eagan Tap due to their non -local charitable status. This item is in order for consideration by the City Council and action is required prior to May 26 or the Gambling Control Board will take action on that date. Enclosed is a copy of a letter, the rental agreement and proposal as submitted by St. Jose h's Home for Children, this information is referenced as pages ` "� � through /S'S� Also enclosed on page/ls o is a copy of a letter received May 15 from the Supervisor of Family Based Services at Dakota County in support of this application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the charitable gambling license for Richard's Food and Liquor as applied for by St. Joseph's Home for Children based on the evidence provided to the City Council that' this is considered a local charitable gambling license. May 8, 1987 Mr. Tom Hedges City Administrator Eagan City Hall 3820 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges, ST. JOSEPH'S EMERGENCY SHELTER RESIDENTIAL & DAY TREATMENT DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION At the suggestion of Gene Van Overbeke I am forwarding this proposal to you and ask that it be considered for the Eagan City Council agenda on Tuesday May 19th.. Fran and Tom Winkel will be presenting the request for a charitable gambling license at Richard's Food and Liquor in Eagan. The proceeds from the program will benefit St. Joseph's Home for Children, an agency of Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis. The Winkels are both active in our organization, as are other Eagan residents. Tom sits on the Corporate Board of Catholic Charities and Fran is Special Events Chairperson for St. Joseph's Annual Fund Steering Committee. Their knowledge of St. Joseph's, its services and the extensive area it serves, make them well- suited to answer any questions the council members may have. We are in the process of applying to the state and hope to be considered at the Gambling Control Board meeting on May 26th, so timing is critical. Please contact me at 827-6241 when the agenda is set, or if you have any further questions. Sincerely, v Ellen Hatfield Associate Director of Development 1121 EAST 46TH STREET ® MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407 ■ (612) 827-6241 Accredited by the Council on Accreditation of Services for Fam' i ildren. Supported through private contributions, contrails for services and grants. r 1q9) RENTAL AGREEMENT This Agreement, made and entered this 30th day of April , 19 87 by and between Richard Stariha (Owner) doing business at the address Richard's Food & Liquor of 4185 S. Robert Trail (Bar and Address) in the City/County of Eagan 55123 , hereinafter called FIRST PARTY, and St. Joseph's Homefor Children/a division of Catholic Charities of the Arch- (.Organization), 1121 East 46th Street diocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis (Street and Box Number), Minneapolis 55407 (City), hereinafter called SECOND PARTY, WITNESSETH: 1. First Party, being the owner and operator of business premises, for an_d in consideration of the sum of $ _-AU—.__per month and other con- sideration hereinafter recited, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant to Second Party for- the period of June 1 , 1 287 th.rough June 1..: 1 988_ the right to locate, on the business premises games of chance devices consisting of those legal in the state of Minnesota, such devices to be located on the business premises where designated by First Party. First. party -shall have no interest in the outcome of such games of chance. 2. Second Party shall pay First Party a monthly rental fee, which shall be a sum sufficient to provide for adequate rental of space. Either party may notify the Other if said party wishes to renegotiate the ex- isting rental fee. Negotiation of rental fees shall in no way reflect upon the variance of monthly gross proceeds of the games of chance but shall be contingent upon actual space usage incurred by the games of chance and the patrons thereof. Any amendments to this lease must be furnished to the Charitable Gambling Control Board at least 10 days prior to the effecti.ye date of the change. I:f said amendment would cause loss of license, it shall be negated . 3. Both parties will comply with all Federal, State, and Local Laws r pertaining to the conduct of games of chance. 4. First Party,agrees that only one eligible organization at a time may operate on the above stated premises and that this premises shall be subject to rules adopted by the state of Minnesota 5. This agreement may be terminated upon the giving of thirty (30) days votive by either party, said notice to be in writing. 6. Brief description of the general area leased by the Second Party: A space approximately 6' x 9' at the end and to the left of the bar as you enter. 0 7. The signing of th%s agreement signifies nullification of any previous agreements made 5y and between First and Scconl. Party or by and between First Party and any other eligible organization for the purposes of con- ducting games of chance. IN WI:TNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hand the day and year first above written. FIRST PARTY; April 30, 1987 pate Date SECOND PARTY: April 30 1987 Date /S/ X K Or d 11 r" EN ON, -,Qe,p--,,, ea1 )9 cl� ST. JOSEPH'S EMERGENCY SHELTER RESIDENTIAL & DAY TREATMENT DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION Proposal Submitted To Eagan City Council by St. Joseph's Home for Children 1121 East 46th Street Minneapolis, MN 55407 Contact Person: Ellen Hatfield 827-6241 1121 EAST 46TH STREET ® MINNEAPOLIS MN 55407 ® (612) 827-6241 Accredited by the Council on Accreditation of Services for Families and Children. Supported through private contributions, contracts for services and grants. /.S t3 ST. JOSEPH'S EMERGENCY SHELTER RESIDENTIAL & DAY TREATMENT DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION St. Joseph's Home for Children is an emergency shelter and resi- dential treatment center for children of all denominations who are abused, abandoned, neglected or emotionally disturbed. The goal of the agency is to promote growth in troubled families and children by providing a therapeutic environment;' which offers respect, security, opportunity and hope. St. Joseph's is a division of Catholic Charities of St. Paul and Minneapolis, and primarily serves twelve counties including Hennepin, Ramsey, Dakota, Scott, Washington, Goodhue, LeSueur, Carver, Wright, Anoka, Chisago and Rice. Programs include emergency shelter for children whose families are in crisis and who need temporary care; day treatment for children with learning disabilities and emotional problems who need specialized education and therapy; residential treatment for children whose emotional and family problems are so severe that they require out -of -home placement for an extended period of 6 to 8 months; and shelter/diagnostic for children outside of our host county who require shelter*or diagnostic evaluation. Dakota County Social Services places children in both residential treatment and in the emergency shelter/diagnostic unit. Children placed in the 11 -bed shelter/diagnostic unit are generally chil- dren whose problems are so severe or whose family situation is too dangerous to allow them to remain in the home. Following a 14 or 30 -day diagnostic evaluation, the multi -disciplinary team makes recommendations to county social services for appro- priate placements in a treatment program, group home or foster care. We are seeing an increasing number of children from Dakota County in this program. Based on the first four months of 1987, pro- jections for the year indicate an 85% increase over 1986 in the number of children referred by Dakota County Social Services (13 children in 1986; 8 children through April 30, 1987). The shelter/diagnostic unit was opened in 1984 at the request of 1121 EAST 46TH STREET ■ MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407 ® (612) 827-6241 - Accredited by the Council on Accreditation of Services for Families j Children. Supported through private contributions, contracts for services and grants. counties surrounding the Twin Cities who were in need of shelter and diagnostic care. It is part of our effort to broaden our services to offer assistance to cities and townships outside of Minneapolis and St. Paul. The residential program has always been open to children from throughout our service area and beyond. Last year we served children from 36 counties, including Dakota. our primary source of support comes from per diem payments made by the referring counties. With the reduction in federal, state and county budgets, per diem reimbursements no longer cover our operating expenses. We are forced to go to the private sector for contributions in order to continue to operate. Currently, 256 of our members who contribute to the support of St. Joseph's are Eagan residents. In addition, we have staff and volunteers in our programs who live in Eagan. A case can certainly be made that we are a service to Eagan. Charitable gambling is a new venture for to enhance the quality of our programs, variety of fundraising vehicles which we to broaden our base of support to enable for hundreds of children who are brought desperate need of help. us and will enable us It is only one of a are currently developing us to continue to care to us each year in Eagan businessman Richard Stariha has agreed to allow us to locate in his restaurant, Richard's Food and Liquor, 4185 South -Robert Trail. The sale of pull -tabs would be managed by a paid staff member of St. Joseph's Home for Children. In addition to St. Joseph's Home for Children, Catholic Charities provides other services to Eagan and Dakota County residents, including training of small group leaders in eight Dakota County parishes including St. John Neumann in Eagan and Mary, Mother of the Church; family counseling services located in Hastings; support groups for separated and divorced in Apple Valley, Burns- ville, and Hastings; aging programs such as Senior Recognition Masses, retreats, grief and loss groups, and collaboration with D.A.R..Tranport, the Dakota area referral and transportaion pro- gram for seniors. In addition to services located in Dakota County, Catholic Charities has programs for unwed mothers, adoptive parents, mentally retarded adults, and family counseling which are available to persons living in the 12 -county Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis. Please give this proposal your serious consideration. The license application will be considered at the May 26th meeting of the Minnesota Gambling Control Board and we are confident that it will be approved. With the approval of the Eagan City Council, we would plan to begin operations no later than June 15, 1987. DAKOTA COUNTY (612) 450-2611 May 13, 1987 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION 33 EAST WENTWORTH, WEST ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55118 REPLY TO: D Human Services Director, (612) 450-2742 0 Public Health Nursing Service O Social Services D Planning (612) 450-2742 744 -19th Ave. North 900 West 128th Street O Employment 8 Economic Assistance, South St. Paul, MN 55075 Burnsville, MN 55337 (612) 450-2611 (612) 455-2291 (612) 887-1577 0 Public Health, (612) 450-2614 O Public Health Nursing Service O Social Services, (612) 450-2677 1101 West County Road 42 O Veteran's Services, (612) 450-2601 Burnsville, MN 55337 33 East Wentworth (612) 435-8055 West St. Paul, MN 55118 Tom Hedges, City Administrator Eagan City Hall 3820 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: This is a letter of support for St. Joseph Home for Children's request for money through charitable gambling in Eagan. Our staff use the facilities at St. Joseph's, especially their shelter program, to help Dakota County families deal with problems such as truancy, running away, emotional disturbance, domestic violence and child abuse and neglect. A short term shelter placement of the child out of the home is often necessary to stabilize a crisis situation, evaluate the nature of the child's and family's disturbance and plan for the child's return home in a way that will maintain the child at home in the future. Space for such shelter placements is often limited within our county, and we frequently need to use facilities outside Dakota County. St. Joseph's provides us with an option for shelter, evaluation and treatment that is relatively close to the families we serve in Eagan and capable of safely providing comprehensive care to troubled youth. Sincerely, Anthony A. Bibus Supervisor, Family Based Services AAB:tlt cc: Ellen Hatfield, St. Joseph Children's Home Patrick Coyne, Manager, Children and Family Section, Dakota County Social Services AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PYLON SIGNAGE FORQ PETROLEUM B. Conditional Use Permit for Q Petroleum for a Pylon Sign in the Rahncliff Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on April 30, 1987, to consider an application submitted by Q -Petroleum and M.G. Astleford for two (2) pylon signs along Cliff Road in the Rahncliff 1st Addition. The APC is recommending approval of both pylon signs. Enclosed on pages / 58 through L� is a copy of 'the Planning Department report on this item. Also enclosed on page is a copy of the APC minutes on this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for pylon signs as submitted by Q Petroleum and M.G. Astleford. /S 7 i41 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PYLON SIGNS) APPLICANT: Q - PETROLEUM LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, RAHN CLIFF 1ST ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: RB (ROADSIDE BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 30, 1987 A DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 20, 1987 - =1 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted by Q -Petroleum and M.G. Astleford requesting two pylon signs along Cliff Road on Lot 1, Block 1, Rahn Cliff 1st Addition. The first sign is 8' wide, 27' tall and has 120 S.F. of signage area. This interior lighted pylon will serve the muffler shop, Rapid Oil Change and Big Wheel Auto Parts Store. Code permits 125 S.F. per side and a 27' maximum height. . The second sign is for the Q Superette and car wash that is attached to the auto center. This pylon would have 66 square feet of interior lighted signage. The height is undetermined but should match the other sign if both are approved. :.t East of Lot 1 is Outlot D that has over 500' of street frontage along Cliff Road. These proposed signs would not effect the .,'1;$,,,-. opportunity for that area to have additional pylon signage. .If approved, these pylon' signs shall be subject to: 1. A 27' maximum height. 2. No additional signage area other than this proposal without another public hearing. 3. To all other applicable Sign Ordinances. 4. The.one time sign fee of $2.50/square foot. sq. TUBE / (CLIFFRCIAD). ILLUM, P(LO i u►1.{ars r�..rr,. -SINGLE FAGE ILLUA4. 1!6<A #ATID.SIGHS 1 1 � 4WtI�HK! Afd' 1 1 .1 1 ('. 1 resat y ; ' (Z) C-• C=� - - AP i CAA WASH' ;MEINEK BIG WHEEL �' 100.1 1 �:.` a,a•I `: MUFFLE.• CHANhE 1 1 1 �.. I cra u:r ansaMcsmc•ru d 1 1 0"4~ . 1 1 1- 1 - ° • ��• . . '• %� D "�r SUPERETTE I mewm�wr • � G 86' 1-----r-------T;---------- ---------- -------- ----------- -- --- i tv d bd•J W, d d Q• CALE::1L 40''O� � �RAHNCLIFF COURT A^p10 OIL, t ? M.AtRl PEe I � M- Rao q AAUGT 5 Ole AWM. C BIAIE BLACK CAR SUPGRETT6 &ey t t _ L-577 . . � -- EWa LS ' 9 13uFa?Ru�L:: f Awg;.. LUS. sq. TUBE / (CLIFFRCIAD). ILLUM, P(LO i u►1.{ars r�..rr,. -SINGLE FAGE ILLUA4. 1!6<A #ATID.SIGHS 1 1 � 4WtI�HK! Afd' 1 1 .1 1 ('. 1 resat y ; ' (Z) C-• C=� - - AP i CAA WASH' ;MEINEK BIG WHEEL �' 100.1 1 �:.` a,a•I `: MUFFLE.• CHANhE 1 1 1 �.. I cra u:r ansaMcsmc•ru d 1 1 0"4~ . 1 1 1- 1 - ° • ��• . . '• %� D "�r SUPERETTE I mewm�wr • � G 86' 1-----r-------T;---------- ---------- -------- ----------- -- --- i tv d bd•J W, d d Q• CALE::1L 40''O� � �RAHNCLIFF COURT A^p10 OIL, t V` � M- AAUGT 5 AWM. C BIAIE sq. TUBE / (CLIFFRCIAD). ILLUM, P(LO i u►1.{ars r�..rr,. -SINGLE FAGE ILLUA4. 1!6<A #ATID.SIGHS 1 1 � 4WtI�HK! Afd' 1 1 .1 1 ('. 1 resat y ; ' (Z) C-• C=� - - AP i CAA WASH' ;MEINEK BIG WHEEL �' 100.1 1 �:.` a,a•I `: MUFFLE.• CHANhE 1 1 1 �.. I cra u:r ansaMcsmc•ru d 1 1 0"4~ . 1 1 1- 1 - ° • ��• . . '• %� D "�r SUPERETTE I mewm�wr • � G 86' 1-----r-------T;---------- ---------- -------- ----------- -- --- i tv d bd•J W, d d Q• CALE::1L 40''O� � �RAHNCLIFF COURT MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING - EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA APRIL 30, 1987 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Thursday, April 30, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Hall, Members Gustafson, Trygg, and Wilkins. Absent were Members Krisnik, McCrea, Voracek and Harrison. Also present were City Planner Dale Runkle, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch and Assistant City Attorney David Keller. AGENDA It was noted that the applicant for Parkwood Presbyterian Church had withdrawn their application. Also, that an informal presentation had been requested for the end of the meeting in regard to Eagan Hills Farm. Wilkins moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the agenda as prepared by staff, with the two exceptions described above. All voted in favor. ,Q=PETROLEUM 'CONDITIONAL USE':' -PERMITS Chairman Hall convened the first public hearing of the evening in regard to.the applications of Q -Petroleum and M.G. Astleford for two pylon signs along Cliff Road on Lot 1, Block 1, Rahn Cliff 1st Addition. Mr. Runkle introduced the proposal which included a 27 foot tall, 8 foot wide, and 120 square foot interior lighted pylon sign for tenants in the development. The second sign was for the Q- Superette and Car Wash consisting of 66 square feet of signage and interior lighting. No one from the public was present to address this issue. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of conditional use permits for two pylon signs subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be a 27 foot maximum height. 2. No additional signage area other than this proposal shall be allowed without another public hearing. 3. The conditional use permit for pylon signs shall be subject to all other applicable Sign Ordinances. 4. This conditional use permit shall be subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. All voted in favor. /6 m Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six REZONING COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LEXINGTON POINTE 2ND ADDITION - C. Lexington Pointe 2nd Addition - Tri -Land Properties - an Amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development, a Rezoning of 57.6 Acres from CSC to a PD R-1, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 169 Lots --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on April 30 to consider applications submitted by Tri -Land Properties requesting an amendment to the Lexington South PD, a rezoning of 57.6 acres from CSC to PD R-1, a Comprehensvie Guide Plan amendment and a preliminary plat entitled Lexington Pointe 2nd Addition consisting of 169 lots. The APC is recommending approval of all applications. For additional information on these applications, refer to the enclosed report as prepared by the Planning and Engineering Departments found on pages (oP, through _1%a . The parkland dedication was satisfied as a specia agreement with the Lexington South PUD. Enclosed on pages l?,3-'17 s a copy of the APRC recommendations regarding trailways. For additional information on this item, refer to the APC minutes, a copy is enclosed on pages _� 5 through Ll _Z. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) an amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development, 2) a rezoning of 57.6 acres from CSC to PD R-1, 3) a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment and 4) a preliminary plat entitled Lexington Pointe 2nd Addition. CITY OF EAGAN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, REZONING, SUBJECT.- COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, AND PRELIMINARY PLAT (LEXINGTON POINTE 2ND ADDITION) APPLICANT: TRI -LAND PROPERTIES LOCATION: NE4 SECTION 26 EXISTING ZONING: CSC WITHIN LEXINGTON SOUTH PD DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 30 APRIL 1987 DATE OF REPORT: 21 APRIL 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINNERING APPLICATIONS: Seperate applications have been submitted by Tri -Land Properties requesting an Amendment to the Lexington South P.D., a Rezoning of 57.6 acres from CSC (Community Shopping Center) within the Lexington South P.D. to a P.D. R-1 (Single Family) District, a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 169 lots located south of Diffley Road just west of the Northview Meadows area. COMMENTS: The site is surrounded by unplatted R-3 land, Northview Meadow Additions and the Lexington Pointe 1ST Addition to the north and east. The Highline Trail/Parkland and CSC (Community Shopping Center) designated property is to the south and west respectively. The north/south NSP Powerline acts as the western property line. This 57.6 acre/169 lot proposal has a gross density of 2.93 units/ acre and net density of 3.66 units/acre. The lots range in size from 10,500 sq. ft. to. 19,250 sq. ft. - averaging 11,870 sq. ft.. The minimum lot width is 73' at the setback line. Since the Lexington South P.D. allows sideyard setbacks of 15' between buildings no additional sideyard variances should be allowed. The- corner lots are larger than most and will easily accomodate the 30' setback required along both streets. GRADING/ DRAINAGE: The land within the proposed development has rolling open topography with very little or no mature vegetation. The site has elevation differentials of approximately 30'+/-. The greatest elevation differentials occur in the southeast corner of the proposed development. Due to the inadequate preliminary design of the proposed storm sewer facilities, only a conceptual analysis of the system can be performed at this time. The development proposes backyard drainage for Blocks 4-6. The development proposes to drain its easterly portion into the proposed ponding area in the center of Lexington Pointe 1st Addition. The outlet for this ponding area is proposed~ as a condition of final plat approval of Lexington Pointe 1st Addition.- The development is proposing a ponding area westerly of Lots 1-8, Block 3,' as a part of this development. The ponding is proposed to handle the runoff generated by the southwesterly portion of the development. The outlet for this ponding area is also the ponding area in the center of L Pointe 1st Addition. No erosion/ sediment control plan was submitted with this application. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth is readily available through the existing 10" subtrunk located in Daniel Drive. Internal lateral collection systems will provide individual service to the proposed lots. Water service to this proposed development is readily available through the existing 12" water main located within Daniel Drive. Internal lateral facilities can be extended to provide service to the individual lots. To provide maximum flexibility for the future commercial land use, this 12" trunk water main will have to be extended westerly within Lexington Pointe Parkway to the existing CSC zoned property. Subsequently, this is not considered a trunk water main but the lateral necessary to service the future commercial uses and shall be the full responsibility of this development. It is felt that a firm commitment for the future use of the westerly adjacent property through a rezoning is necessary to properly design the utility services to their most economical and efficient use. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this proposed development is readily available through the recent completion of Daniel Drive and the proposed Lexington Pointe 1st Addition. However, when Daniel Drive was installed as a condition of the Northview Meadows 2nd Addition, it was understood that any future development would require its northerly extension and connection to Diffley Road. The location of this Daniel Drive intersection with Diffley Road must be in a location approved by the Dakota County Highway Department to ensure proper spacing between major intersections, taking into consideration the commercial property to the west, the elementary and future high school sites to the north, and the future Braddock Trail extension to the Stafford Place Addition in the northeast. The County will allow one major access onto Diffley Road between Lexington Avenue and Braddock Trail. The development appears to be extending Daniel Drive westerly to a point just south of the westerly entrance to Northview Elementary School, then north to Diffley Road. This location is acceptable to Dakota County for a major access point. A secondary access to Diffley Road will be allowed at the approximate westerly boundary of the proposed development. The intersection of Daniel Drive and the north -south connection to Diffley Road shall be a "T" configuration. /6� EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development shall ensure that a full 80' right-of-way dedication is provided for Daniel Drive to its County approved intersections with Diffley Road. Lexington Pointe Parkway is to be designed with an 80' right-of-way dedication. All other internal streets within this proposed residential development shall have a minimum 60' right-of-way. All ponding easements for this development shall be dedicated to incorporate the maximum storage volume capacities necessary to handle the highest intensity use of the surrounding undeveloped property in accordance with the overall Master Plan. In addition to the County Highway access permits, this development shall acquire all regulatory agency permits necessary for the utility extensions. ASSESSMENTS: The underlying property incorporated by this subdivision has been previously assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer and trunk water main at the single-family rates. There are several pending assessments for streets and utilities associated with Daniel Drive under Project #475. However, when Daniel Drive was installed under that project, it was in anticipation of this property being developed on a commercial basis. Subsequently, the pending assessments are greater than that which would be required with the residential development similar to this proposal. However, it is recommended that this development agree to assume those additional assessments beyond the residential benefit as a condition of the proposed downzoning. This property has not yet paid its trunk area storm sewer assessments and as a condition of final plat approval should accept them as follows: Item Quantity Rate Amount Trunk Area Storm Sewer 2,012,472/sf $.053/sf $106,661 All final assessment rates shall be those in effect at the time of final plat approval, based on final plat area calculations. /&V CONDITIONS: LEXINGTON POINTE 2ND ADDITION 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. No side -yard variances with buildings less than 15' apart shall be allowed. 3. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication Fee. 4. Downstream trunk storm sewer facilities shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 5. An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval. 6. In addition to all common lot line drainage and utility easements, appropriate utility and ponding easements must be dedicated based on final design alignment and elevations. 7. This development shall be responsible for constructing a 12" trunk water main within Lexington Pointe Parkway to provide service to the adjacent commercial property. 8. This development shall be responsible for providing a sanitary sewer stub to the adjacent commercial property. 9. Major and minor access locations onto Diffley Road shall be in accordance with Dakota County Highway Department recommendations. 10. Daniel Drive and Lexington Pointe Parkway shall be dedicated with an 80' wide rights-of-way. All remaining interior residential streets shall be a minimum 60' wide right-of-way. 11. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency and County permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. 12. This development shall assume its assessment responsibilities associated with trunk area storm sewer. 13. An 8' wide bituminous trailway shall be constructed along the west side of Daniel Drive as the responsibility of this development. 14. This development shall be responsible for a parks dedication fee. 15. The westerly extension of Daniel Drive and its intersection with the north -south major and minor connection to Diffley Road shall have a "T" configuration. 16. A detail storm sewer system shall be submitted and approved by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval. l�� D a 0 z 0 U ujte% V.1 0 i - z x w S O � + ' J � a j , • • � a � III .'r-' !•.-..J... 1. CL I,!I.i W O �3 O � W .'r-' !•.-..J... 1. CL It w z z O 0 Z Q O ~ O c7 z Z O X U W Ld W i J in W j CL 0 7-f 1 ix < z 14 4 z LU X m LLJ �o 333 2; JI I - r Z z •ti I l jLl, Ll LI. t: 0 UN His 1J.H 0 UN moi. ,s, � � QI I > PIN CL - cr cc �' �,.•� / x.03, (c Z 0 6 1 r �S :• ' �' ' f�_ 1 �` � 1_...t; /��\�\�.`�,lt 1i1 t� � U' 11�, t I \'..`, i%•w \�r. '\\'�''' -;;y_' �.'•Ilw�11111 l/ a ii •« /�'� fes. - \�c ori;\ Y�;� �`� I•rt ;A�•.h'�(•,i''=-- a ! III • � ,. � ' � - i �'\`��.�v�t�_ , 11 • _-� CC^... �'�; !!lIl.,{C�,'� _ r' �„��`- __ �,�, y IL C ii a f : . « I /' ; c xrvz �' tom. _ � 6. 4� . � ' 4 + 1`� I' _ -- "� 'I t• ,. ;s i t 11 � j , 1Gii7� !• 'r=t=. �� w r��.-'�� +;/—'t' ,! r;•• '`•5�1��,'`. --• 3 f�: r t ��` I. :tom i� cs. -- �� '• � H a'{ i � I � �(.F, �_�\ �r r� ` 1 I �•�' .L� _,,.�� �} ti t Iti•i'i'i'i 'I 3 ! , J ¢ `� �_1"ti`s`,' 1 F .t '• _ �7 �1, `� i,'�//// ••—� ' ,,. I r :I! !!a.r :� :I�!;- 'I 3 ! t Z `\ ;%j, .1-':� - .�` �. .I .�. :1• _i�l � ��.•� -r,�� ..._.�7 .I- r: �`.�J '�i 1 �:1 o;3j;�iir'e •'!''!E ;�3: �; 7 11 71� i� ,/•.. ���z—.--_L--13— J� a .1 � fl -� •err __ �-..I :r-' =t . �' i. :t: ::! u /1 )�I 11� `/. �(I -�. "•j _l '�f�,i r••( ,/�/�'//.=�j;.-I._ -.�ir '�I'i 11� h, � u s i'! :i.' - 9ti=n' '! '1 u' .� ,�. ,I /• I I• -s J' - ��~i /; /// �t" I '� is !: -i! :7: i :i i- s_;i � /'���L'� \\! ` yi r ': I � c• ��cr!^'1T'��' -�• � rri• .�1 � �1 -_ii-i:_ __ �t �i I -moi:./,] I 1 Y.-- ./ - ":��.�1..�.=:•: - �n�� Iii - '� - ii� 3! }v •!7.-;:��l�i,. w=abtl+l�>t3 SiiiV U41 w•.. "'- - -- --- - - = --. _ ./• �`;.- _'•���' 'c�':Sie.: _c:: !_. �✓yyj7 / _ p[ t:: ti is;:li ii= !!.l:::::'33!i !ti I ! 1 � � � : / �/ i 1 't �,� �I I 4 :. ili1��°.i.! E!! i;ItE•: t. `fi is iii•;iiii:?! 5=! t!11iihiEi: ii: i. •;'.. _ 'ilii ' % -- ! "'� N � 1 Nil-�'� iry;_ - _ =:�fi�i'i':°�cii;? .`1•Ec3 �:'I";•:?3 i it '�'� I` ! s'E;!i•:!a.ii;l: l� :............. �._ 1 i •.��� J O ` 'I � r�l a.ii...:!i:1 I s1!I ti t•J , ', I / —` : _';::; :::: i!!cai l; iili!ie:: i:; ii:::3: 1 3 i.. ..i --' ------------- - II ((R bNp. Win . tip F , �r-.' CJ-,' . . . . . . . ju NO if i;'1! i'l UA Rot OKI 0P1 -A' cf ---• -- - ------ T --------------- --- I holy! Tim"! pq.- Wo rL Z Z 0 3,C 0" , ll !fill •LLJ z 4 CL bNp. Win . tip F , �r-.' CJ-,' . . . . . . . ju NO if i;'1! i'l UA Rot OKI 0P1 -A' cf ---• -- - ------ T --------------- --- I holy! Tim"! pq.- MIN soualrE JP -20 C�F~�' 855 6 J-o�A J — — J 523 L.S.-17 J -w 815.3— 840.0 �(a0 i I L dd �2• JP -3'4 ��,�J-s J -r 884.6 JP -4' 0 JP -2 0. 880.4 \ 8401 \ JP -29 926.0 945.0 W' P -27i —T R 9 ki3O ' o; DIFFLEY ROAD 0 51 o — r� I •.� I ' w��a N 1 I i 0. 6. 0 x i :NSINC... ;N H PLACE V,1st�O '{' ; G Qc JP- 23 '�' Z 652.2 857.4 JP -2 843. "A JP -25 �l 817.0 sl 824.0CC/ �x CY L.S.-18 JP -26 --% 1806.0- 24-0. s /�, :� H 4k �O 9• -y J-oa 1,` AUOI70R'S SU N N0. aF / E 0 •----- -- JP -52 i y� JP -68 862.0 0 878.0 / J -bb :nLJIDPARK LP 471 u 3Q $ 908.Oi 908.3 9/0.661 9I /6.0 9 J I_ _.-1— t iF z '.00i LP- 27 ' 922.0 925.4 r I SUBJECT PARCEL LEXINGTON POINTE ADD. approved: standard plate 4: city of eagan PUBLIC STORM SEWER m DEORKSPARTMENTio MASTER PLAN I N. E. 1/4 S E C. 2 6, T 2 79 R 2 3 ac.—. -.K ......... SEV4 SEP 23, T ZT R23 couNry STATE HIGH.Al Z, A I E N "TH Yo. hl - ?, ids W'. Y /Y ".x A N& iCNING`f LEXINGTON POINTE 1st ADD � p/ •4" ......... .. 7 ............... ..r.. ..1...:::'-:: ... ....... Z:;�� ................. .... ..... ............ t ...... ... .... .. ........ ... . . .... ........... .......... . .. .............. .... ............ .... N, ....... LEXINGTON POINTE 2nd ADD. SCHWANZ .............. .... ....... 012-05 LAKE ........ ... . .. .................. ........ % CADV ............ ...... .......... SFIF'4 ............ ........... STORM SEWER TRUNK AREA 46.2 Ac. ............ MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: MAY 11, 1987 RE: LEXINGTON POINT 2ND ADDITION At the Advisory Commission meeting on Thursday, May 7, the Advisory Commission reviewed the Lexington Point 2nd Addition for trails requirements. Mr. Brad Swenson, developer of this project, was present at the Commission meeting to discuss with the members this particular residential development. Lexington Point is a part of the Lexington South PUD and all parkland dedication has been completed. However, trails remain an issue for the Commission's recommendations. After significant review and discussion by the Advisory Commission, the Commission made the following recommendations to the City Council which the developer was in agreement with: 1) that the developer provide a ten -foot trailway in the south portion of this plat connecting to the Highline Trail, location to be determined by staff and the developer, generally located between Lots 16 and 26, Block 3; 2) that a trail be located in the 50 -foot NSP easement south of Lexington Point Parkway; 3) that a sidewalk be extended along Lexington Point Parkway extending from Daniel Drive to the 50 -foot NSP easement; 4) that an 8' bituminous trailway or concrete sidewalk of 5 feet in width be extended along Daniel Drive from Diffley Road to Lexington Point Parkway; 5) that the triangular portion of the property located in the southeast corner be dedicated to the City for parks purposes; 6) that, in an effort to save a significant number of oaks and vegetation, the developer be granted a variance to the 30 -foot setback requirement for lots in the southeast corner extending from approximately Lots 39 through 31. This variance to the setback requirement of approximately 10 feet should have the impact of saving a significant number of trees. It is also understood that the City will provide a trailway along the current road right of way extending south of Lexington Point Parkway to Trapp Farm Park. Jq5 TOM HEDGES MAY 11, 1987 PAGE TWO The Commission is also aware of the City's discussion regarding road width and alignment for both the Lexington Point Parkway and the southeast residential road. The Commission would like to draw the Council's attention to the roadway width issue requesting that the narrowest road or 50' right of way be req uied to allow for an adjustment of these lots in order to move the lots and h es, forward to save the trees. DirectbF of Parks & Recreation KV/mc cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Marilyn Wucherpfennig, Planning Aide Brad Swenson, Tri -Land, Inc. J�q t APC Minutes April 30, 1987 Hall moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for on -sale 3.2 beer and wine. In addition, but separate from the previous approval, it is recommended that the conditional use permit, if allowed under the existing City Code and approved by the City Council after the appropriate applications for on -sale liquor, be approved. All voted in favor. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. That staff verify that proper notice was provided for the public hearing before the Planning Commission in regard to this matter. 2. All Sign Ordinance requirements shall be adhered to. All voted yes. LEXINGTON POINTE 2ND ADDITION - PD AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The third public hearing of the evening was in regard to the second item' on the- agenda and convened by Chairman Hall. The request of Tri -Land Properties included an amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development, a rezoning of 57.6 acres from CSC (Community Shopping Center) within the Lexington South PD to R-1 PD (Single Family district), Comprehensive Guide Amendment and a preliminary plat consisting of 169 lots located on the northeast quarter of Section 26, south of Diffley Road and east of Lexington Avenue. Mr. Runkle introduced the application, noting that the rezoning for this parcel had been requested upon the application for the 1st Addition in order to facilitate the design and sizing of utilities for that addition. Mr. Brad Swenson was present to answer questions on behalf of the developer and no one from the public was present to address this issue. After discussion in regard to condition 15 of the staff report, the developer indicated that he could comply with the suggestions. The developer indicated the intent to develop the land west of the proposal and east of Lexington Avenue as approximately 50 acres of commercial and 37 acres of apartments. Mr. Colbert indicated that at this time, the only issue was sanitary sewer sizing, which should be based upon the highest use. In response to member Gustafson's questions, the developer indicated that 60% of the lots were undersized and under the 85 foot width. Mr. Swenson expressed concern in regard to the 80 foot right-of-way being requested for Lexington Pointe Parkway. Mr. Colbert indicated that indeed a 70 foot right-of-way would be sufficient if the Advisory Parks Commission and City Council determined that a trailway was not APC Minutes April 30, 1987 necessary ``along -Lexington Pointe Parkway. Mr. Colbert also indicated Ih -response to member Wilkins' questions, that the 44 foot wide face-to-face street would be provided in either of the right- of-way situations, providing for an 8 foot safety lane for residents that would need to back onto the street from their homes. Trygg moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Guide Amendment. All voted yes. Trygg moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend rezoning and an amendment to the Planned Development from CSC (Commercial Shopping Center) to R-1 PD. All voted yea. Trygg moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. No side -yard variances with buildings less than 15 feet apart shall be allowed. 3. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 4. Downstream trunk storm sewer facilities shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 5. An erosion and sediment control plan shall -be submitted and approved prior -to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval. 6. In addition to all common lot line drainage and utility easements, appropriate utility and ponding easements must be dedicated based upon final design alignment and elevations. 7. This development shall be responsible for constructing a 12 inch trunk water main within Lexington Pointe Parkway to provide service to the adjacent commercial property. 8. This development shall be responsible for providing a sanitary sewer stub to the adjacent commercial property. 9. Major and minor access, locations onto Diffley Road shall be in accordance with Dakota County Highway Department recommendations. 10. Daniel Drive and Lexington Pointe Parkway shall be dedicated with 80 foot wide rights-of-way if trailway is determined to be necessary. All remaining interior residential streets shall be a minimum 60 foot wide right-of-way. 11. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency and County permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. APC Minutes April 30, 1987 12. This development shall assume its assessment responsibilities associated with trunk area storm sewer. 13. An 8 foot wide bituminous trailway shall be constructed along the west side of Daniel Drive or located as determined by the Parks Commission, as the responsibility of this development. 14. The westerly extension of Daniel Drive and its intersection with the north -south major and minor connection to Diffley Road shall have a "T" configuration. 15. A detailed storm sewer system shall be 'submitted and approved by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval. All members voted affirmatively. EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The fourth public hearing of the evening was then called by Chairman Hall in regard to the applications of Partnership Royale for rezoning of approximately 46.848 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a preliminary plat consisting of 65 lots and one outlot located in the southeast quarter of Section 31, abutting Safari Pass on the- east and Cedar Avenue on the west, with a variance for a cul-de-sac in excess of subdivision standards. City Planner Runkle described the location, topography and lot configurations for 73 single family lots. Mr. Marvin Eggum, one of the partners, was present to introduce the proposal, in addition to Mr. Mike Halley and Mr. Loren Spande, who ind-icated that their homes would range in value from $220,000.00 to $600,000.00. Mr. Ralph Wagner, engineer for the partnership, was also present to describe the large lots which anticipate 100 foot widths at the setback line. Mr. Wagner also indicated that some platting would have to be delayed to interface with the Watschke property to the north. There was no one from the public to address the issue. In regard to Mr. Gustafson's question, the developer and Mr. Foertsch indicated that the looping of.water lines could be resolved between City staff and the applicant. Staff also indicated that the cul-de-sac and tear- drop cul-de-sac issue had been resolved in addition to grading. In response to questions regarding estate zoning, Mr. Spande indicated that the architectural controls and requirements for overall value of homesites would create an estate type development. In response to member Wilkins' question in regard to the variance for cul-de-sac, Mr. Colbert indicated that indeed it was necessary due to the topography. In response to Chairman Hall's question, Mr. Foertsch indicated that changes received by the staff in the last two days from the developer, were responsive to staff's concerns expressed in the report. He also indicated that staff could review the matter prior to the City Council meeting if detailed plans were f+ M Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ULTRA IV ADDITION D. Ultra IV Addition for a Preliminary Plat to Include a Restaurant/Bar with Athletic Fields in an R-1 District and a Conditional Use Permit to Allow On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Beer Sales --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on April 30, 1987, to consider a preliminary plat entitled Ultra IV Addition consisting of one lot and a conditional use permit to allow on -sale wine and 3.2 beer sales and pylon sign. The application also consisted of a conditional use permit for recreational facilities in an L-1 district. The APC is recommending approval of the preliminary plat and all three (3) conditional use permits as presented. For a copy of the staff reports on the preliminary plat and conditional use perm,*,t pertaining to Ultra IV Addition, refer to pages 1-) _1_ through dL. For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page(s) Also enclosed on page00c_2-is a copy of the APRC recommendation that this plat be subject to a commercial/industrial parks dedication cash requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for a restaurant/bar referred to as Ultra IV Addition and conditional use permits for on -sale wine and 3.2 beer sales, pylon sign and allowing a restaurant use in an LI district. /7 F CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ULTRA IV ADDITION APPLICANT: ULTRA IV, INC.- LOCATION: NC_LOCATION: W1/2 SECTION 17 EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 30, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 15, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Ultra IV, Inc. requesting a Preliminary Plat of approximately 12 LI acres for a restaurant/ bar and athletic facility. This site, Tract F of Reg- istered Land Survey #4 will contain 10.3 acres for the restaurant and a 1.9 acre outlot. City Code permits Class I (sitdown) rest- aurants in LI districts and indoor commercial recreation facilities such as bowling alleys and tennis clubs. Outdoor facilities are not specifically addressed. On sale wine and 3.2 beer sales are listed as Conditional Use items. A seperate liquor license will be required. The Conditional Use Permit requested now is for a pylon sign. The site,located on the west side of HWY 13 is surrounded by LaHass Corporation across Blackhawk Road to the east, office type use and undeveloped property to the north/west an existing single family residence on the corner of Shawnee Road and HWY 13. SITE PLAN/BUILDING CONCEPT: This 250 seat restaurant requires 83- 10' wide parking stalls. 308 have been provided in order to accom- odate the needs of approximately 12 softball teams that may use this facility for tournament play. The two story building contains two volleyball courts on the lower level along with the bar/eating area and dance floor. The volleyball area is open to the second floor and visible from that eating area through a glass wall. A large deck on the western sides of the building over looks the two fenced softball fields. These fields are designed for Class A teams - the highest level of amateur play. The distance from home plate to the fence is 300'. Ample warmup area has been provided between the fields. There has been a concern by staff of balls being hit into lots with different ownership. The exterior of the building is playfull and very -appropriate for its use. A prefinished metal canopy/roof design along with pennants will add a festive color to the stucco on block main struc- ture ture. All setbacks meet*Code requirements. /77 Page 2 The preliminary landscape plan is well done and meets the performance standards listed in the landscape policy. Screening the large park- ing area was the main concern and the mixture of plant material, sizes and species will also create year round interests. The proposed pylon sign along HWY 13 at the Blackhawk intersection has not been designed yet but the location, 125 sq. ft. per side 27' height proposed meet the requirements of the Sign Ordinance. GRADING/ DRAINAGE: This proposed development is located on a site that generally slopes from the intersection of T.H. 13 and Blackhawk Road to the east with a total elevation differential of approximately 42'. Subsequently, the prleliminary grading plan submitted proposes a two-tier development with the upper level consisting of the parking lot and main floor facility with the lower level incorporating two recreational softball fields. This site has had a considerable amount of construction demolition and sludge ash fill deposited from the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant operations to achieve its current elevations. The attached Soil and Water Conservation District report discusses this impact in greater detail. The MPCA is currently monitoring the ground water to determine the extend of potential contamination associated with this fill material. The proposed 3% slope of the recreational softball fields does not meet the 1 & 1/2 - 2s slopes required by the City recreation standards. In addition, a 20' flat area should be provided outside of the foul lines adjacent to the parking lot side slope which is not reflected in the submitted grading plan. It is also strongly recommended that intercepting drainage swales be constructed adjacent to each ballfield's foul line to intercept and prevent drainage from the parking lot side slopes from crossing the playing surface. The grading required for the proposed parking lot construction adjacent to T.H. 13 removes the minimum fill required over the existing 16" trunk water main. Either a revised grading plan will have to be submitted or this existing trunk water main will have to be lowered in place to conform to the new grades. The existing ditch along the east property line should be shaped to its final configuration and properly established with permanent vegetation to conform to the overall site development. There is an existing 42" trunk storm sewer facility which parallels Blackhawk Road traversing this site along the western edge of the parking lot facility. An intercepting catch basin manhole should be constructed between the two ballfields to provide better drainage for the previously referenced drainage swales. Existing drainage swales will either have to be provided for or, properly relocated to ensure continuation of upstream drainage areas. Page 3 The internal parking lot storm sewer system is adequate to handle the drainage from the proposed parking lot facility. However, a storm sewer line with a capacity of 17 cfs must be extended to Blackhawk Road to provide for future extension to the east to handle the drainage from the LaHass property in conformance with the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. In light of these considerations, the revised detail site grading plan should be prepared and resubmitted. In order to address these cncerns, it may be necessary to construct significant retaining walls or reduce/relocate the restaurant facility and its related parking stall configuration. Adjustment to the existing trunk storm sewer facilities will have to be provided for in the final grading plan to maintain access to manholes. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient capacity and depth is immediately available along T.H. 13 and within Blackhawk Road to provide adequate service to this proposed development. . As previously mentioned, it is anticipated that a section of the 16" trunk water main adjacent to T.H. 13 may have to be relocated due to the proposed change in grades. The internal placement of appropriate fire hydrants for fire protection will be addressed as a part of the building permit application process. STREETS/CIRCULATION: This site is adequately serviced by existing T.H. 13 and Blackhawk Road, both of which are currently upgraded to its ultimate design standards and capable of handling the traffic generated from this development. However, with this and other additional developments in the overall industrial park, it is anticipated that increased traffic demands will ultimately require the installation of a traffic control signal on T.H. 13 at Blackhawk Road. The internal parking lot configuration and circulation appears to conform to City Ordinances and standards. However, the northerly most access on Blackhawk Road does not appear to line up opposite the existing access to the LaHass Corporation facility on the opposite side. Therefore, a revised parking lot layout will have to be submitted and reviewed to ensure internal circulation compatability. The parking stalls located on the north side of the northerly most entrance are located in an area that will be very susceptible to foul balls. The parking stall ratio requirements should be reviewed to see if these stalls can be eliminated. If not, they should be relocated to provide an adequate separation from the ballfields. The southerly entrance closest to T.H. 13 provides adequate spacing and stacking and will not create a capacity problem. /9l Page 4 EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Any grading or excavation work performed within T.H. 13 will require the appropriate permit from MnDOT. Correspondence from the MPCA should be received in regards to the acceptability of the existing fill material in relationship to the proposed development and existing ground water system. There does not appear to be any other utility, grading or street construction located outside the boundary of this development requiring additional permanent or temporary construction easements. ASSESSMENTS: The property proposed for development under the Ultra IV Addition application has been previously assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer facilities at the proper rates. However, Blackhawk Road improvements installed under Project 110B inadvertently ommitted 150' of frontage. The assessments for the recent extension of Blackhawk Road with related storm sewer facilities was withdrawn from the final assessment roll based on objections submitted from the property owner at the hearing held on September 16, 1986. Subsequently, any development on this property should accept these outstanding special assessments. This property has not been previously assessed for its lateral benefit from the trunk sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewr facilities adjacent to this development. This responsibility should be a condition of plat approval based on the rates in effect at the time of that approval. These are all identified as follows: Item Quantity Rate Amount Project Blackhawk Rd. Streets 150'(1) $92.76/ff $13,914.00 110B Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main 719.36' 20.55/ff 14,783.00 15 Lateral Benefit from Trunk Sanitary Sewer' 244.87' 15.06/ff 3,688.00 4 Lateral Benefit from Trunk Storm Sewer 740' 10.39/ff 7,689.00 279 & 428 Blackhawk Rd. Streets 225' 59.27/ff 13,335.10 428(2) Blackhawk Rd. Storm Sewer 225' 9.94/ff 2,236.83 428(2) (1)Unassessed frontage for Blackhawk Road, Project 110B. (2)Figure should be adjusted for interest incurred since September' 16, 1986, (final assessment hearing). All quantities and rates will be in accordance with the final plat documents and application year. CONDITIONS: ULTRA IV ADDITION 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The detailed landscape plan will be required with the final plat and the financial guarentee shall not be released until one year after the date of installation. 3. A parking lot lighting plan shall be submitted with the final plat. No direct lighting source shall be visible from HWY 13. 4. All Sign Ordinances shall be adhered to. 5. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication Fee. 6. No tailgating parties will be allowed. 7. The northerly most driveway access must line up opposite the exiting main entrance to LaHass Corporation on the east side. 8. A revised grading and drainage plan must be submitted to provide the installation of softball fields compatible to City of Eagan recreational standards and other standard engineering concerns. 9. The adjustment to the existing trunk storm sewer and trunk water main facilities shall be the full responsibility of this development. 10. This development shall provide a 17 cfs capacity storm sewer extension to Blackhawk Road for future extension to the east to handle upstream drainage. 11. The northerly most portion of the parking lot should be reduced or relocated to minimize the impact of foul balls from the softball complex. 12- All regulatory agency permits and/or comments shall be obtained prior to final plat approval. 13. This development shall accept its full financial responsibility for additional assessment obligations associated with the development of this property. 14. This development shall provide adequate drainage easements for any existing or proposed utility system or drainage swales providing service to other private/public properties. / �3 DAKOTA COUNTY SOMI AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT MINNESOTA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS April 7, 1987 TO: ;Mike Foer tsch City of Eagan FROM: Lynn M. Chakoian Dakota County S4:CD PE: Ultra IV Preliminary Plat 3ACKCIZOUND: Farmington Professional Building 821 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: (612) 463.8626 A preliminary_ polat oronosal for Ultra IV was submitted for erosion and sediment control review. Plans include a site plan, landscape plan, utility and grading clan. A Preliminary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has riot been submitted. SOIL AND 6'ATER PFSOURC'E,S: The site area was nreviously used for sludge ash fill. The suitability of this soil material for the Ultra IV application needs investigation. The ;Minnesota Pollution Control Agency should provide input with regard to the potential for groudwater contamination from this material being buried on a longterm basis. No wetlands, water bodies or holding basins are located on the subject Property. Channels leaving the site will carry stormwater to the Minnesota River. EPOSION AND SEDIMENT CONTPOL: No Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been submitted. The plan should follow the "Checklist" and "General Criteria" provided by the City of Eagan. Some specific information follows that may be useful in preparation of the Ulan. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER. O al�CaSIOr1 CONTROL MEASURES Within two days of completion of rough grading, the entire site should be seeded and mulched to stabilize the disturbed areas. This esaecially applies to the ball field area. Once this is re -vegetated, sediment movement off site will be greatly reduced. Seeding and mulching details, as identified on the "Checklist", should be specified. Structural measures needed for erosion control on this site may include temoorary gravel construction entrances, silt curtain along the north and west side of the develonment, and storm sewer inlet filters. Detailed plans for these structural practices should be provided. The silt curtain shown on the grading and drainage plan is not placed correctly. Relocate this silt fence to the other side of the new channels. Phis will help reduce sediment movement into the channels and downstream. Placing silt fence across the channel would be ineffective because the flows woulu become concentrated. After the silt fence is properly installed, fill should be placed at the silt fence first. This fill will create a berm that will greatly contribute to the effectiveness of the silt fence in stopping sediment movement into the channels. EROSION CONTROL MANAGEMENT All erosion and sediment measures should be in place before grading and then regularly inspected and maintained as needed. The individual responsible for this must be .identified on the plan. We recommend that a statement be placed on the development plan indicating that the builders will be responsible for erosion and sediment control during construction. Schedules for installing utilities, revegetation of those disturbed areas, building construction and blackt000ing are required. These schedules impact what erosion control measures will be necessary. Disposition of erosion and sediment control measures needs to be addressed. Include a contact person responsible for final clean up of the site. OTHER COMMENTS Adeauate stabilization of the relocated addressed, and of those downstream. No information was provided in the grading kgs channels needs to be downstream and drainage Man. CONCLUSIONS We understand, that with any new program, it takes time to educate those involved in developing, Erosion and Sediment Control Plans. ;ve hope that Erosion and Sediment Control Plans are submitted with future Preliminary Plats. ;,'e recommend that the Preliminary Plat be approved, but that an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan be submitted and approved before a grading permit is issued or final plat approval. cc: John Z. Marsh, Seenberg-z?enkel Co. Heise, Vanny and Associates Brad Swensen, Tri -Land Inc. �V Z � Bl E �i ` � n s > y A tie •4 O { ieeilci'i;c4 =iitcir:i3 Hebe ULTRA IV mte, FGAN' MINNESUTA ol. 1 Wse Vanney IV(�%\ i FLOOR PLAN p jz j'nl k. Heise !�_ ateS , ULTRA IV ELEVATIONS AND _ - -- W AS.SOdr... SECTION — __. w—es-aar� Heise soc'abes LLTRAp�\ �rAnare. ORE. ...,. 0 -L., �-, S~ -y. -- ��w�- ��-. ai - i�•al•�.fi k.�11 �.. .,: `1.'-_�`�-� .' 0 ' !I % r II ■ fd t}'� M` s o= .L:{'.AC_ €i-9"rdv .► - — - i X n pq �.a;,.r tom,. . • � - ,1 f Gay �� � �� `F ���I�ti Pitt `I 1 .� : fes-•. _ •7 � J_ `f ,1 �,., €���ppt�A��gRgRni��, �I•, 1 -A _ - '' l •. '! ... .f .: - , plyy tt1�iitt� �f�� jI i - - - - --- -; m --t,--- -- cn ^r' • _ /Z> q. t Z m a pt 1 •e�' `I �� 'I 11 %. •t I s �• ll � ii � � � �fl:r1 I. 1 � � � t!'ll61 ,I - ►J�1 � f I I. i;i ' . l ' 1. I � I Il 1 - � .I 1 I- Ij!1t1i�111 �• �. I.�Ih6 a�!It'� I •, � C1 .'7 •- •'Ti � q, �: � •id ,I L 5 � 'i� �' �: B '. y?y� w i i — +I• ([ ! -_ + �.- I iii'_- i � +� -- >r e D' ULTRA N. :ME PLAN Vanney F. Aseodates FAr W MNNi'SOTA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: ...... a.0.•ra►.■1.0 f 02010. n u ...14iD.. .. f.., 1O.f..OT. 11122 f1!/•.• -O V• w,� i 1 N t a I [C ' I 'a F 6 • � � � n �" ,K T1 R '■�I 6 r I f ' !I % r II ■ fd t}'� M` s o= .L:{'.AC_ €i-9"rdv .► - — - i X n pq �.a;,.r tom,. . • � - ,1 f Gay �� � �� `F ���I�ti Pitt `I 1 .� : fes-•. _ •7 � J_ `f ,1 �,., €���ppt�A��gRgRni��, �I•, 1 -A _ - '' l •. '! ... .f .: - , plyy tt1�iitt� �f�� jI i - - - - --- -; m --t,--- -- cn ^r' • _ /Z> q. t Z m a pt 1 •e�' `I �� 'I 11 %. •t I s �• ll � ii � � � �fl:r1 I. 1 � � � t!'ll61 ,I - ►J�1 � f I I. i;i ' . l ' 1. I � I Il 1 - � .I 1 I- Ij!1t1i�111 �• �. I.�Ih6 a�!It'� I •, � C1 .'7 •- •'Ti � q, �: � •id ,I L 5 � 'i� �' �: B '. y?y� w i i — +I• ([ ! -_ + �.- I iii'_- i � +� -- >r e D' ULTRA N. :ME PLAN Vanney F. Aseodates FAr W MNNi'SOTA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: ...... a.0.•ra►.■1.0 f 02010. n u ...14iD.. .. f.., 1O.f..OT. 11122 f1!/•.• -O V• w,� i 1 -- ;•+ . fit'; . . , .• - ' �,T r 1. 3 -�- I � - _-_-. _ 1 j � ! ' '.lei• > .f .1 � p c F .t ---'__----------------_ F rrreet"tUMS tt�fti=c=!cF c: •'i!'ii; 'ts -csF =Fei�'iireE�: SF=r - i S"^WNCC ROAD ((60' ROMA . 44 25-8) 217 � �� •- y / �—/ � / � Y. ,�\ �\\ VL � ��.— r rst •jf cam. a� _7L�_� = ••'mac\ �`� � �` y—�� �—J\ --�--- a V K oe' a BLACK+"WH . ROAD (60' KO.W. ++' 9-0) 1 1 1 r rst •jf cam. 1 1 1 ►y r, ; _ .. �:, ._ un"�1 A _ ............. LkiAd.a N e„. how. 67 N MBNA` ,• LT i 25 - a. ` �p : iIA IRK r _ - Eagan - -Int.erce fior 68 _ a \ ; E} i , . FOX L. f RIDGE I I 48 T V— ( 3 ✓C-- 1 ,t 26 f� Metropolitan_ Wasle Control Commisslon 'I- ,� \� `t Seneca �Piant j 2 r WT A , ,. 54.: �T-E- . f ,C - E US ' PA / §, / l � 10 r - k 12 �•,,,TA ` 1211 -A/ - �.•, ADDITION , r :....,:_.,' 1 a W — B 72'1 0 r-' n -T �. �r t3L �K BL (SR.C. HILLS W7 ve, i \ 36 IR C V, iff / ^ ? GAN ME RD CENtER./Li_/�J�.. x,\\ a8rl — - SILLV �t !!{:: 2 _ ; T i� _ V...-•';/.--.-_� LAi�t�0 �.. � ADD.'''�✓�,�G � a rLACK Y �`` / \:'� lli r• J;4a?.Scy�f�^ ; < PARK d_GF � •� r A . SUBJECT PARCEL - - -ULTRA IV FIG G. #-.2 City of eagan SANITARY approved. standard SEWER LFa\ PUBLIC plate #: WORKS MASTER PLAN Cm DEPARTMEN .... _.... . CP N:0, I 7 5. / - j 769.4 y' � _� % .... � ..._.� --- :'air: I /Y /~ /� / ' \ ' • �\ .,l/ PIAL. CP INDUST 790.7 806. ^ %GA P -2,.7 113 �. � *�� � • c✓' 796.3 r \lam` r l•Y;iCGt4i rt 1 . •'y - ' ; .._ �, y=- , ,— G% b : A- bb �:- �'••.,,- \ •. ..-', ;:ENO 1rt-�---� - - A—i j A D TI ON� so 'w •A - k k / A- h AF - 3 8 ,-•- F C �ci c 8C 839.8 _ 696,3 •i -.A= 84/.4 703.6'l ,ILVEii 7 %Z A-9 ' ✓ } GAN MEII X816; 2T t A. \ _ ►. /,i p. \ SILL I -..� (-A-PF36^rT1..._ = T Q 1. aDD.� f� I1 \\\tom-��� ) '�`�D� pf-...)`'�`i. \ii� VILtL�E . ;. 1 /, �� i /\ J11 �r \,,'J� .'r1Cl:F�i`tiY /A\;� �/� \� r�. \.�54 l.' A k, ?��-{� ._, ` s 7. Q'PgI,HAV[ N 54"`rI r Nlrr / ,�_��/ �,;r:•'/ ./�\ _797 )3.RiC �.� rr j ,856:6 G} cP .�� �; �/ �i•�.`1 ..1•y—ri i ,34T l jM L1. 1 I ��; A x'72 A�11' 36 r —, f'27. 6 �,.... r_....r ._r..�,� T.f.,T"A— .AP- r- 1`1 795.5 1y •� a _ C ,R�n A 804.2 a y a' t `\Y I' 5 EpA, ED f it "`` � �_ �. 1 r � �'1`'`... }`r ! I � r. -� .-.-`•��_[ �._L�� `. I I h �.Pr Et lirll�a -{E aI.NE �N I ANDAC LIAN-C.GG h 72 ] t K A' ?AAkP_ LLL/. 6FENA-w PARK J11 I ML � AP 35 ' 852:3-' Ef?f3riE 2 / `•• `� 880:6 ..._ � r SCnOGL{-� T- .-._.. ITT . _ _ i 886.0 ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL ULTRA IV- F I G. V- FIG. #1 city of eagSTORM SEWER approved: standard PUBLIC STORM : �- - - WORKS MASTER PLAN °° CPARTMENT l Np IA` I RK ' h Ix "..j.a FOX I. 4A RIDGE 4,07 A 63.9 O.. -- %' I A �5�,. •; 0� 12r 79 , I 6r 20r �8 ..82 L• 60.T/..-. 887/ ., 61.0 95a g0 8 106.0 7TREA AIENT,: 68.8/84.0 PL NT SITE Y4p h� 1 91 *.1/92.0 CDG --` 14,5 '/ _. ti • , 7.' 71;4/8 .0 a .0 5s�' .ir • 83 ° 950 30 �c a -46�'� INOU IAL .� AFl. _�, a \t. 92 69.5/8 l0 / l� 75%71.0 - 'y '^': t 1•Lr - 93 60.4/78.0 p 18r All . / ` f 0 69.9/70.0 a �T - - ` •u. 1 [ I 84.7 .0/65.0 (I T KENOF,. -� 8 567 T S' 8L ..0 i' �. ADlY6T(ANt la 95 94 JUMP 9 ' / I ;86 73.3/74.0 1950 9CKH YK_.,,. 78 MIL' SILL 96 9 - / 75'`3%76. TLi3�/71.0 /rao 1 7T ? 64.3/84.0 e _ 'tao 'y _ 135 q � 13'¢ , 133` C % I '4� _ 1 i 1 SILL J sl 660 `131 Ari S5 56.2/770 -- ` BLACKHAWK PARK WOODHAVEN PARIS 7"- � rE 136 ,69.6;(611.0 -lt�f -i -1�8' ` I 517/ 67.0 / �� 1a;✓ I _ y. 18•. 123 •::_-y-:� �l � !• r ' ULTRA IV SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. *3 city of eagan WATER standard ate rd 0PUB#: LIC $ WORKS MASTER PLAN co N DEPARTMEN n �A A J�PF' �,r 1'd'� — ------ B — + t-------------------� ---- (a -Q �r BLACKHAWK RD. i c 1 TI \Y'1'Y'7 • ji SI Ir po -------�-- �— M .4►l�.r/N ,,i0'IL711_.,'. _`^/ / I IY�i�{9:y�1�!!Y — (oa-� —MnaJ —o►) avoa 33NMVM9 — 77ee I I • • • • 0 9.0 SANITARY SEWER LATERAL BENEFIT 244.87' • WATERMAIN LATERAL BENEFIT 719.36' * * * * * * * STORM SEWER LATERAL BENEFIT 740.0' 0 Im m m STREETS 150.0' APC Minutes April 30, 1987 ULTRA IV ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT At the request of a representative of the developer of Lexington Point 2nd Addition, this item was continued further into the meeting and the second hearing of the evening was in regard to the applications of Ultra IV, Inc. for preliminary plat and conditional use permit for a restaurant/bar with athletic field in a Light Industrial district located on Tract F, RLS Lot #4, west of Highway #13 between Blackhawk and Shawnee Roads in the west half of Section 17. It was noted by Mr. Runkle that City Code permits Class I (sitdown) restaurant in Light. Industrial districts and indoor commercial recreational facility such as bowling alleys and tennis clubs: Outdoor athletic facilities are not addressed in the ordinance. He also noted that on -sale wine and 3.2 beer sales are listed as conditional uses within Light Industrial districts and that the applicant had indicated a desire for a liquor license. Finally, a conditional use permit was being requested for a pylon sign. Mr. Tom Reinen of Heise, Vanney & Associates, 123 No. 3rd Street, #108, Minneapolis, MN was present on behalf of the applicant and reviewed the plan, layout and proposed building construction. There was no one present from the public to address this issue. In response to questions in regard to locker room facilities, attorney John Berglund indicated that none would be provided. Mr. Berglund also indicated that the parking stall numbers could be reduced to prevent potential damage to automobiles from foul balls. Mr. Berglund further indicated that spectator seating would be provided between the softball diamonds in addition to spectator viewing from the decks of the building. ..Mr. Colbert indicated that erosion and sediment control would be a standard condition of the plat. In response to member Trygg's comments regarding alignment of the access drives, Mr. Colbert indicated that this could be resolved with the developer. In response to Mr. " Gustafson's questions, the developer indicated that plans to resolve the issues expressed by staff could be submitted to staff by Tuesday, May 5, 1987 if the proposal was recommended for approval to the City Council. Wilkins moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. The detailed landscape plan will be required with the final plat and the financial guarantee shall not be released until one year after the date of installation. ,i AVC- Mii►utes April 30, 1987 3... A parking lot lighting plan shall be submitted with the final`plat.`- No direct lighting source shall be visible from Highway #13. A. ll, -Sign Ordinances shall be adhered to: -- , -5.- -This plat shall be subject-toa parks dedication fee. 6. No tailgating parties shall be allowed. 7. The northerly most driveway access must line up opposite the exiting main entrance to LaHass Corporation on the east side. B. A revised grading and provide the installation of Eagan recreational standards concerns. 9. The adjustment to the water main facilities shall development. drainage plan must be submitted to softball fields compatible to City of and other standard engineering existing trunk storm sewer and trunk be the full responsibility of this 10. This development shall provide a 17 cfs capacity storm sewer 'extension to-Blackhawk Road for future extension to the east to handle upstream drainage. 11.. The northerly most portion of the parking lot should be •educed" or -`relocated to'minimize-the impact of foul balls from the softball complex. 12. All regulatory agency permits and/or comments shall be obtained prior to final plat approval. 13. This development shall accept its full financial responsibility for additional assessment obligations associated with the development of this property. 14. This development shall provide adequate drainage easements for any. -existing or proposed utility system or drainage swales providing service to other private/public properties. 15. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditioned upon the developer providing necessary plans and information to the staff by May 6, 1987 to address staff concerns in staff's report. Failure to comply with this condition shall result in the plat being considered to have been continued by the Planning Commission until its next regular meeting. All voted yes. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for softball fields. All voted aye. IV aC�C) APC Minutes April 30, 1987 Hall moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for on -sale 3.2 beer and wine. In addition, but separate from the previous approval, it is recommended that the conditional use permit, if allowed under the existing City Code and approved by the City Council after the appropriate applications for on -sale liquor, be approved. All voted in favor. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. That staff verify that proper notice was provided for the public hearing before the Planning Commission in regard to this matter. 2. All Sign Ordinance requirements shall be adhered to. All voted yes. LEXINGTON POINTE 2ND ADDITION - PD AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The third public hearing of the evening was in regard to the second item" on the- agenda and convened by Chairman Hall. The request of Tri -Land Properties included an amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development, a rezoning of 57.6 acres from CSC (Community Shopping Center) within the Lexington South PD to R-1 PD (Single Family district), Comprehensive Guide Amendment and a preliminary plat consisting of 169 lots located on the northeast quarter of Section 26, south of Diffley Road and east of Lexington Avenue. Mr. Runkle introduced the application, noting that the rezoning for this parcel had been requested upon the application for the lstAddition in order to facilitate the design and sizing of utilities for that addition. Mr. Brad Swenson was present to answer questions on behalf of the developer and no one from the public was present to address this issue. After discussion in regard to condition 15 of the staff report, the developer indicated that he could comply with the suggestions. The developer indicated the intent to develop the land west of the proposal and east of Lexington Avenue as approximately 50 acres of commercial and 37 acres of apartments. Mr. Colbert indicated that at this time, the only issue was sanitary sewer sizing, which should be based upon the highest use. In response to member Gustafson's questions, the developer indicated that 60% of the lots were undersized and under the 85 foot width. Mr. Swenson expressed concern in regard to the 80 foot right-of-way being requested for Lexington Pointe Parkway. Mr. Colbert indicated that indeed a 70 foot right-of-way would be sufficient if the Advisory Parks Commission and City Council determined that a trailway was not MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: MAY 11, 1987 RE: ULTRA IV ADDITION The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission has reviewed the proposed Ultra IV Addition at its May 7, 1987 Advisory Commission meeting. The Commission is aware that this commercial development proposes softball facilities and indoor volleyball courts associated with a restaurant. Based on the conversations that staff has had with the developer, this is a commercial enterprise operation that the Commission felt would provide little or no benefit to the reduction of recreational needs within the community. Therefore, the Commission has recommended to the City Council that this plat be subject to a commWc:�al/industrial parks dedication cash requirement. Director'of Parks & Recreation KV/mc cc: Marilyn Wucherpfennig Steve Hanson, Construction Analyst Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION E. Eagan Royale Addition - Rezoning of Approximately 46.848 Acres from A to R-1 and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 65 Lots and One Outlot--A public hearing was held at the April 30, 1987 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, to consider two (2) applications submitted by the Partnership Royale for a rezoning from A to R-1 and a preliminary plat consisting of 73 lots on approximately 47 acres abutting Safari Pass. The APC is recommending approval of both applications. There is also a variance request for cul-de-sacs in excess of 500 feet which were approved by the APC. For additional inforination on these applications, refer to the staff report on pages through -Q,1-5. For a c y of the APC action regarding this item, refer to page(s) 0i& -air ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R-1 and a preliminary plat entitled Eagan Royale Addition as presented. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE (EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION) APPLICANT: PARTNERSHIP ROYALE LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 31 EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 30, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 21, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS: Two applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning from A (agricultural) to R-1 (single family) and a preliminary plat consisting of 73 lots on 47 acres abutting Safari Pass on the east and Highway 35E on the west. Apple Valley and the City's water tower abut to the south and undeveloped agricultural to the north. ZONING AND LAND USE: This site is heavily wooded, full of hills and water holding depressions suited extremely well for upper bracket housing. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site and the land to the north D -II (0-6 units/acre). The 73 lots give this plat an overall density of 1.5 units/acre. The average lot size is between 17,000 - 25,000 S.F. The smallest is 15,000 S.F. and the largest is 95,000 S.F. that contains a pond along I -35E. All lots meet or exceed R-1 lot standards. Two lots have direct access onto Safari Pass. If approved as is, stove pipe shaped Lot 8 should be given distinct setback requirements in order to not infringe on the privacy of the adjacent lots. The house pad in the proposed location works well. The 'front' setback should stay a minimum 70' from the southern property line or match the setback of Lot 9 if that home is built first. Sideyard setbacks of 15' would increase the distance between the housing but not infringe on the flexibility of that lot to be built on. A variance will be required for the cul-de-sacs in excess of 500' serving the westernmost lots and the ones along the road to the water tower. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The proposed site offers extremely rugged topography, a mixture of mature trees, numerous ponds and low areas, and elevation differentials in excess of 1001plus or minus. The proposed grading has a major impact on the existing low areas within the site. Two low areas are being filled to accomodate house pads. The proposed partial filling of three remaining low areas greatly reduces their ponding storage volumes. One of the ponding areas which is greatly affected by the proposed filling is a designated ponding area in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer plan. Detailed analysis of the proposed site's ponding requirements must be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit. The developer has failed to resolve staff's concerns regarding the significant impact on the extensive vegetation with this proposed grading plan. The proposed preliminary storm sewer design is inadequate to handle the runoff generated by this development and does not provide adequate draining for landlocked low areas created by the proposed grading. The low area at the terminus of the proposed storm sewer does not have an outlet. The proposed street grades are within acceptable standards considering the extreme elevation differentials throughout this site. The developer has failed to address staff's concerns regarding the proposed elimination of the access road to the resevoir site. This may affect the feasibility of this cul-de-sac. The preliminary plat fails to define the intent of the proposed street stub and cul- de-sac street running along its northerly boundary. An inadequate erosion and sediment control plan was submitted with the preliminary plat. The erosion and sediment control plan should be revised and submitted to the Dakota County SWCD staff for their approval before a grading permit is issued or final plat approval is granted. UTILITIES: Water main of sufficient size presently exists along Safari Pass and the entrance to the water tower site. The development proposes various water main loops to ensure adequate pressure throughout the development. The dead-end water mains in the two westerly cul-de-sacs should be interconnected. The proposed water main connection along Lots 6 - 8 and 11 - 12, Block 2 is not recommended. Water service to Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 can be obtained from the existing water main along Safari Pass. The development is proposing to stub water main to the adjacent northerly property for future service and would ultimately connect to the existing water main in Safari Trail. Trunk sanitary sewer installation is required prior to construction of the necessary lateral sanitary sewer to serve the proposed development. Sanitary sewer of sufficient size and depth exists . along Safari Pass to serve Lots 8 - 14 inclusive, Block 2. The proposed sanitary sewer along the common lot lines in the southeasterly portion of the development will not be allowed. A C)� sanitary sewer lateral can be constructed along the water tower access road to serve Lots 10 - 14 inclusive, Block 2 from the existing sewer in Safari Pass. Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 should be served from the existing sanitary sewer in Safari Pass. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this site is provided by Safari Pass on the east and through the Briar Oaks of Apple Valley 2nd Addition on the south. The development is in compliance with the City policy of maintaining interconnection of roadways between neighboring communities. The proposed entrance/through roadway into this site will have a minimum 60' right-of-way. The proposed 50' right-of-way cul-de-sac streets are acceptable. The proposed teardrop design cul-de-sac is not acceptable. An acceptable circular design cul-de-sac with center islands is available from staff. The proposed cul-de-sac shall have a minimum radius of 601. The minimum roadway width on the proposed cul-de-sac streets shall be 28' face -of -curb to face -of -curb. The proposed entrance/ through roadway minimum width shall be 32' face -of -curb to face -of -curb. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development shall ensure that all appropriate ponding easements and utility easements are dedicated as such on the final plat. The ponding easements for this development shall be dedicated to incorporate the maximum storage volume capacities necessary to handle the runoff generated by the proposed development. The 50' half right-of-way that presently exists for Safari Pass exceeds the minimum 30' half right-of-way required by the City for a residential street. The City will vacate the westerly 20' of the existing 50' half right-of-way adjacent to the proposed development upon submission of the appropriate petition by the developer. This development shall be responsible for all the necessary permits required by MnDot to construct utility improvements within the I -35E right-of-way and all other regulatory agencies as necessary prior to final plat approval. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed site has been assessed for sanitary sewer trunk and water area -under Project #254 at the single-family rate. The development will be responsible for the following additional assessments as a condition of final plat approval. Description Rate Quantity Amount Proj #_ Trunk storm sewer $0.053/SF Lateral benefit $12.47/ff water main (B) Lateral benefit $12.47/ff water main (A) Street - Safari Pass $35.44/ff (A) Safari Pass (B) Water tower road 2025540/SF $107,350.00 316 609.29/ff $ 7,598.00 366 1116.66/ff $ 13,925.00 254 1011/ff $ 35,830.00 254 Total $164,702.84 '�?o( :) All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the final quantities contained in the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. CONDITIONS: EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION 1. A revised grading plan shall be submitted to staff for their approval prior to final plat approval. The following two areas shall be addressed: (1) minimizing filling of existing low areas and (2) revised street grades on the cul-de-sac street providing .access to the water tower site. 2- Downstream storm sewer facilities shall be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. 3- Storm sewer facilities shall be designed to adequately intercept the runoff generated by the proposed development. 4- The appropriate ponding area easement shall be dedicated on the final plat. 5- The development shall submit an erosion/sediment control plan acceptable to staff. 6- Slope easements from the affected residents of Briar Oaks of Apple Valley lst Addition shall be the responsibility of this development. 7- The development shall be responsible for providing storm sewer for the existing drain at the water tower site. 8. The dead-end water mains in the two westerly cul-de-sacs shall be interconnected. 9- The proposed water main connection in the southeasterly corner of the development which follows the common lot line shall be eliminated. Water service for Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 can be obtained from existing water main in Safari Pass. 10. The development shall be responsible for providing a water main stub to the adjacent northerly property. 11. Trunk sanitary sewer installation shall be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. 12. The proposed sanitary sewer along the common lot lines in the southeasterly corner of the proposed development shall not be allowed. 13. Sanitary sewer service for Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 can be provided from the existing sanitary sewer along Safari Pass. 14. Lots 10 - 14 inclusive, Block 2 shall be served by a sanitary sewer lateral which connects to the existing sanitary sewer in Safari Pass. l`�r7 EAGAN ROYALE CONDITIONS PAGE ,2 1,5. The proposed entrance/ through roadway into the site shall be dedicated with a 60' right-of-way. The street width within the 60' right-of-way shall be a minimum of 32' face -of -curb to face -of -curb. 16. The proposed cul-de-sac street shall be dedicated with a 50' wide right-of-way, a minimum 60' radius on the bubble of the cul-de-sac, and a minimum street width of 28' face -of -curb to face -of -curb. 17. In addition to common lot line drainage and utility easements, the development shall be responsible for any additional easements required for final approval of plans and specifications. 18. It shall be the responsibility of this development to provide utility service to each individual lot in the proposed development. 19. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 20. Variances for the (2) 5001+ cul-de-sacs shall be granted. 21. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication fee. 22. Lot 8, Block 2 shall have 15' sideyard setbacks and a 'front setback matching Lot 9 or a minimum 70' from the southern property line. T tg t�r•� L.1 P (% � D•II C� P lEj D -II -.,.. P D -III J/ DIV add �, E : a o-• 1H a a O� Oiji�7 b 66 ;y J s /" N i N � 2=l'� 6o •Y:l •:iY _ ale: • 1 i ; • A: 1t1YjV5; �, E : a o-• 1H a a O� Oiji�7 b 66 ;y J s /" N i • 1 i ; �, E : a o-• 1H a a O� Oiji�7 b 66 ;y J s /" N 4 LU w e 1 I X 9q w Lj r. C. -A" {ALIt.. J w S p t v0 Z 4 W g, W Z 2 C Q - C Zv W 9CHOOL LLu R T H 41-�41417 21 pll;w 893 1 m �, 9.1. A Pa RI 9/--,. �i 1J \\, N. PRO CEDAF 5 'R K W 7 919.1 AP- -925.6 930.6 2 OAP4605Aj"' 8\ 946. 24' "---q. A P 46 J 9 4 5. 0 ; L�'T 948.5 P, 16L-- " , �54" MA LIFF.: 2nd A C,J6-00 15' 12 113',,' 4L- P;63�5 SLY 88886.6126 A -cc AP -23 RAFIN 889.3 AP49 900.01 881.7 889.0 A P. = I I/ 889 z "89,4.'7 P-25 80.5 AP -50 888.5 88.5 886.0 AP -42 -94.0 8950 8 j --- 11_11j 40 R 23 W city of eagan PUBLIC C3 WORKS .0 DEPARTME _1tj 5.5 t 3: 7 4 2-1: 912.1 A3 'LE .12 1935.0 AP -13 9376 )U., yi !908 2 0a "'A P-14 4 4L:L `0 14. 6 912.1 919.3 L-- L!933.9,:-_ AP -44 _1047w, ,A -f 915.9 r V L 9 �bf --BID F is P-48 920.61- Xr- 5 77 _934. 9:22,'O 9015,,?� SAFA k is APPLE ESTA vYy ! /0 LP -591 DKOTA COUNTY PARK 893.31 6,.A-Ayy 900.01 A -z' LP VALLEY I N SUBJECT PARCEL . ......... EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION NU. +11 approved: standard I plate #: STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN/ or 8 1. 1, all 19wm-.... WN'Iiwo�6 la SL! R, R 23 W SUBJECT PARCEL EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION FIG. #3 City of eagan approved standard PUBLIC WATER plate WORKS k /-'MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT STORM SEWER 00000 STREET/STORM TRUNK 46.5 Ac. SEWER LATERAL 1,011' 0 0 * 0 • WATER LATERAL BENEFIT 1,116.66' APC Minutes April 30, 1987 12. This development shall assume its assessment responsibilities associated with trunk area storm sewer. 13. An 8 foot wide bituminous trailway shall be constructed along the west side of Daniel Drive or located as determined by the Parks Commission, as the responsibility of this development. 14. The westerly extension of Daniel Drive and its intersection with the north -south major and minor connection to Diffley Road shall have a "T" configuration. 15. A detailed storm sewer system shall be submitted and approved by staff prior to issuance of a grading permit or final plat approval. All members voted affirmatively. EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The 'fourth public hearing of the evening was then called by Chairman Hall in regard to the applications of Partnership Royale for rezoning of approximately 46.848 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a preliminary plat consisting of 65 lots and one outlot located in the southeast quarter of Section 31, abutting Safari Pass on the- east and Cedar Avenue on the west, with a variance for a cul-de-sac in excess of subdivision standards. City Planner Runkle described the location, topography and lot configurations for 73 single family lots. Mr. Marvin Eggum, one of the partners, was present to introduce the proposal, in addition to Mr. Mike Halley and Mr. Loren Spande, who indicated that their homes would range in value from $220,000.00 to $600,000.00. Mr. Ralph Wagner, engineer for the partnership, was also present to describe the large lots which anticipate 100 foot widths at the setback line. Mr. Wagner also indicated that some platting would have to be delayed to interface with the Watschke property to the north. There was no one from the public to address the issue. In regard to Mr. Gustafson's question, the developer and Mr. Foertsch indicated that the looping of.water lines could be resolved between City staff and the applicant. Staff also indicated that the cul-de-sac and tear- drop cul-de-sac issue had been resolved in addition to grading. In response to questions regarding estate zoning, Mr. Spande indicated that the architectural controls and requirements for overall value of homesites would create an estate type development. In response to member Wilkins' question in regard to the variance for cul-de-sac, Mr. Colbert indicated that indeed it was necessary due to the topography. In response to Chairman Hall's question, Mr. Foertsch indicated that changes received by the staff in the last two days from the developer, were responsive to staff's concerns expressed in the report. He also indicated that staff could review the matter prior to the City Council meeting if detailed plans were k ;2lG .. K XPC 'M''iWA' s April 30, 1987 submi-tted by the following Wednesday. Mr. Wagner indicated that the developer --could comply- with this requirement. Mr. Runkle noted that staff had requested the authority to allow setback variances to save trees and topography. Wilkins moved, Gustafson -seconded the motion'"'to recommend approval of rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family). All voted ;yes,.---- Wilkins yes,: -- Wilkins moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat with a variance for the proposed cul-de-sac, subject to the following conditions: 1. A revised grading plan shall be submitted to staff for their approval prior to final plat approval. The following two areas shall be addressed: (1) minimizing filling of existing low areas and (2) revised street grades on the cul-de-sac street providing access to the water tower site. 2. Downstream storm sewer facilities shall be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. 3. Storm sewer facilities shall be designed to adequately intercept the runoff generated by the proposed development. .4: :The appropriate ponding area shall be dedicated on the final plat. - 5". The development shall submit an erosion/sediment control plan acceptable to staff. - 6. Slope easements from the affected residents of Briar Oaks of Apple Valley 1st Addition shall be the responsibility of this development. 7. The development shall be responsible for providing storm sewer for the existing drain at the water tower site. 8. The dead-end water mains in the two westerly cul-de-sacs shall be interconnected if water pressure and volumes warrant such looping. 9. The --proposed water main connection in the southeasterly corner of the development which follows the common lot line shall be eliminated. Water service for Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 can be obtained from existing water main in Safari Pass. 10. The development shall be responsible for providing a water main stub to the adjacent northerly property. 11. Trunk sanitary sewer installation shall be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. Z4ai7 APC Minutes April 30, 1987 12. The proposed sanitary sewer along the common lot lines in the southeasterly corner of the proposed development shall not be allowed. 13. Sanitary sewer service for Lots 8 and 9, Block 2 can be provided from the existing sanitary sewer along Safari Pass. 14. Lots 10-14 inclusive, Block 2, shall be served by a sanitary sewer lateral which connects to the existing sanitary sewer in Safari Pass. 15. The proposed entrance/through roadway into the site shall be dedicated with a 60 foot right-of-way. The street width within the 60 foot right-of-way shall be a minimum of 32 feet face -of -curb to face -of -curb. 16. The proposed cul-de-sac street shall be dedicated with a 50 foot side right-of-way, minimum 60 foot radius on the bubble of the cul-de-sac, and a minimum street width of 28 feet face -of -curb to face -of -curb. 17. In addition to common lot line drainage and utility easements, the development shall be responsible for any additional easements required for final approval of plans and specifications. 18. It shall be the responsibility of this development to provide utility service to each individual lot in the proposed development. 19. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 20. Variances for the (2) 500+ feet cul-de-sacs shall be granted. 21. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 22. Lot 8, Block 2, shall have 15 foot sideyard setbacks and a front setback matching Lot 9 or a_minimum 70 feet from the southern property line. - 23. Revised grading plan shall be submitted to the City staff on or before May 6, 1987. If such plan is not approved at a subsequent date or submitted timely, this matter shall be -considered to be have been continued. 24. Setback variances shall be allowed pursuant to staff review and approval to prevent unnecessary disruption of topography and vegetation. All voted yes. The applicant was advised that vacation of 20 feet of right-of- way for Safari Pass will require a separate public hearing. Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR COUNTRY HOLLOW ADDITION F. Rezoning of Approximately 45.47 Acres from A to R-1 and Preliminary Plat for Country Hollow Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on April 30, 1987, to consider a rezoning application for 45.47 acres from A to R-1 and a preliminary plat for the Country Hollow Addition consisting of 99 lots. The APC is recommending approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For additional information on the rezoning and preliminary plat applications as presented, refer to the Engineering and Planning Department reports, copies are enclosed on pages,?,20 through a�5_ The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a cash dedication for this proposed subdivison. For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to page(s) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R-1 and a preliminary plat entitled Country Hollow Addition. a V�'\ CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT (COUNTRY HOLLOW ADDITION) APPLICANT: PROGRESS ENGINEERING INCORPORATED LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 31 EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 30, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 22, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS: Separate applications have been submitted by Progress Engineering requesting a rezoning of 45.47 agricultural acres to R-1 (single family) and a preliminary plat for the Country Hollow Addition. This plat consists of 99 lots located north of Diffley Road and just east of Dodd Road. The November, 1986 Land Use Map designates this area D -II, 3-6 units per acre. No amendment will be necessary. SITE PLAN/CODE CONFORMANCE: This plat is surrounded by agricultural parcels on all four sides including the area on the south side of Diffley Road. The site has rolling topography with some very steep slopes. The hillsides along the western property line and the area abutting Diffley are among the steepest, containing dense hardwood trees. This plan will save a majority of those creating a natural buffer especially to Diffley Road. A single access to Diffley will serve this property with stub extentions to the north and east. The lots vary in size from 12,000 - 56,000 S.F. Most are between 12,000 - 14,000 S.F. The larger ones are due to ponding areas or undevelopable hillsides. All lots will meet or exceed the 85' width at the setback line. Staff recommends that'Lot 1, Block 1, be granted a 30' setback along Diffley Road. Code requires 50' due to the 100' right-of-way width. This lot will have its driveway on the proposed street - the area along Diffley will act as a side yard. R GRADING & DRAINAGE: This proposed development is located adjacent to some extremely rough and variable topography with maximum differentials of approximately 90'. The most severe slopes are located to the west and south adjacent to County Road 30. Because of the severe topography, major grading will be performed over the majority of the property to provide the required storm water storage capacities and better define these drainage basins in relationship to the adjacent buildable lots and streets. The preliminary grading plan submitted does not indicate any encroachment into adjacent private property to accommodate this development proposal. This development is located in the lowest portions of the overall larger drainage basin for the extreme eastern portion of the City. Initially, the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan required the majority of this proposed development to be used for storm water detention purposes. However, through a detailed analysis of this portion of the drainage basin, the storage volume within this development has been reduced to a required 63 acre feet of storage with a controlled water elevation established at 800 and an estimated high water flood elevation of 818.0. This development will require the installation of a major trunk storm sewer lift station with a force main outlet pumping the water northwest to Dodd Road and into the gravity storm sewer system being constructed as a part of the overall Eagan Hill Farms concept development. Storm sewer laterals will have to be extended to the east line of this development to provide outlets for the future ponding areas located to the east. Similarily, a storm sewer extension will also have to be provided at the north property line near the westerly street extension and must be sized to accommodate direct runoff from approximately 14.0 acres to the north. Another storm sewer extension must be provided to the north property line along the common rear lot lines within Block 5 for future runoff. It is not anticipated that storm sewer interceptor laterals will have to be extended to the south to the County Road right-of-way as all future drainage should be conveyed and directed approximately 200' east of this development into the easterly part of Pond JP -26 as a part of the modified Comprehensive Storm Sewer system. Due to the severe topography along the westerly edge of this development, specific channelization and stabilization will have to be performed on the side slopes to direct water to common lot lines to propagate the existing drainage pattern based on existing contours. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL: Refer to the detailed report prepared by the Soil and Water Conservation District regarding specific concerns pertaining to this development. UTILITIES: Presently, sanitary sewer and water main facilities' necessary to allow this development are not immediately available in the area. e�:;� I A major trunk sanitary sewer lift station will be installed within this proposed development under Project 491 as a part of the overall Eagan Hill Farm concept development plan. This lift station will be sized accordingly to handle gravity flow generated from the internal lateral distribution system to service this development. This lift station will then pump sanitary flows through a force main to the intersection of Dodd Road and County Road 30 into the existing trunk sanitary facility. A trunk sanitary sewer line will have to be installed to the northeast corner of this development to provide future service to subdistrict C -KK, with another trunk sanitary line to the east to service future subdistrict C -LL. Water availability for this development will have to be provided through the installation and extension of the trunk water main system from the intersection of Dodd and Diffley Roads to the east line of this development. This will also require the installation of a trunk pressure reducing station to provide adequate pressures for domestic use. It is strongly recommended that this internal water main for this development be looped northwesterly to the trunk water main extension in Dodd Road being provided as a part of the Eagan Hill Farms development under Project 491. STREET 'CIRCULATION: Due to the steep and rugged topography in this general area and the undeveloped adjacent private property, there is only one feasible access to this development from County Road 30 near the eastern end of this development. This developer has been able to maintain a maximum 8s street grade throughout this development through the extensive grading being proposed. All streets should also provide a maximum 2s approach grade to all intersections and a minimum of 75' from the existing edge of County Road 30. In order to accommodate emergency and maintenance vehicles, this development must provide temporary turn-arounds either on the adjacent private property or within this development for all proposed dead-end stub streets. The proposed location of the stub streets have been evaluated and appear to be properly located with one exception. Three stub streets to the north are being proposed. The middle street should be shortened and permanently cul-de-saced due to its incompatibility for continuation based on existing and forseeable future grades. County Road 30 (Diffley Road) adjacent to the southern boundary of this development presently exists as a two-lane rural county road. There is no immediate or long-range schedules for the upgrading of this segment of the county road system due to low projected traffic volumes. Its current status is adequate to handle this proposed development. EASEMENT/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development shall be responsible for dedicating a 60' half right-of-way for Dodd Road with a 20' construction easement to accommodate potential future., upgrading. All cul-de-saced streets shall have a minimim width of 50' with a 60' radius at the turn -around and a minimum 28' wide street surface (face -of -curb to face -of -curb). All other through streets shall have a minimum 60' right-of-way with a minimum 32' street surface. Q,;�_ Q In addition to the common lot line drainage and utility easements, additional easements along common lot lines shall be dedicated of sufficient width to accommodate the sanitary sewer, water and/or storm sewer extensions as required with the final approved plans and specifications. The easements necessary for the water main looping and storm sewer force main outlet across the property to the north and west to Dodd Road shall be the acquisition responsibility of this development. Also, all temporary cul-de-sacs constructed outside of the boundaries of this development shall be acquired and dedicated prior to final plat approval. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency (County Highway, MPGA, Department of Health, etc.). ASSESSMENTS: Due to the fact that no utilities have previously been installed in this area, this development shall be responsible for all trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer assessments as a condition of final plat approval based on the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval and final quantity calculations providing appropriate credits for dedicated public right-of-way and ponding easements. In addition, this development shall prepay its future assessment obligations for the upgrading of County Road 30 based on 25% of the residential street equivalent rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. These assessment obligations are estimated as follows: Item Quantity Rate Amount Project # Trunk Area Water 37.87 ac $1,250/ac $47,338 491 (pending) Trunk Area Sanitary Sewer 37.87 1,300/ac 49,231 491 (pending) Trunk Storm Sewer 1,650,000 sf 0.053/sf 87,450 TOTAL $184,019 COUNTRY HOLLOW CONDITIONS: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication fee. 3. Lot 1, Block 1, shall have a 30' setback or more along Diffley Road. 4. The City Council must authorize the installation of trunk water main and trunk storm sewer facilities necessary to service this development prior to final plat approval. 5. A 60' half right-of-way and a 20' construction easement must be dedicated for the future upgrading of County Road 30. All cul- de-saced streets shall have a minimum right-of-way of 50' with all remaining through streets having a minimum right-of-way of 60'. 6. In addition to the 10' common lot line drainage and utility easement, additional easements shall be dedicated of sufficient width to accommodate the installation of all required storm sewer, water main and sanitary sewer facilities proposed to be located outside of dedicated right-of-way. 7. This development shall provide and dedicate appropriate ponding easements providing for 63 acre feet of storage based on a controlled water elevation of 800.0 and a high water elevation of 818.0. 8. This development shall install the required channelization and related stabilization to convey existing drainage swales along proposed common lot lines into the existing storm sewer system. A minimum 20' drainage and utility easement shall be conveyed over these drainage channels. 9. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all easements outside the boundaries of -this development as necessary to provide water service and trunk storm sewer force main outlets to serve this development in addition to any permanent or temporary construction easements necessary to accommodate temporary cul-de-sacs for dead-end streets. 10. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired in a time frame required by the affected agency. 11. The middle of the proposed three -street connections to the north shall be shortened and permanently cul-de-saced. 12. This development shall be responsible for all related assessment obligations associated with its approval. "?a DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT MINNESOTA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS April 7, 1987 TO: ,-like Foertsch City of Eagan FPOP: Lvnn M. Chakoian '�J^" w Dakota County SWCD RE: Country hollow Preliminary Plat BACKGROUND: Farmington Professional Building 821 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: (612) 463-8626 A preliminary plat proposal for Country hollow was submitted for erosion and sediment control review. Site, grading and utility plans were submitted. An erosion and sediment control plan has not been submitted. SOIL AND WATER REVIEW: Soil Resources Three soil textures are found on this site: sandy loam, loamy sand and Quam silt loam areas are present. The sandy loam and loamy sand areas have a seasonal watertable that is greater than 5 feet below the surface; these areas appear not to nose limitations for the development. The Quam silt loam presents limitations for the development --the seasonal watertable is +2-1 feet below the surface. The Quam soil areas are outlined in blue on the attached site plan. 1) Soil borings by a geotechnical firm should focus on determining if the watertable is Perched. 2) Removal of this wet soil :material and replacement with appropriately compacted fill should be planned where street or building construction is indicated. Water Resources Two storm water holding ponds are to be constructed within this develooment. The storm sewer Pipes entering the ponds may need stabilization. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER �� 3) The on-site drainage plan should be analyzed to determine if the outlets require stabilization. The site drainage plan also includes an outlet for the low area in the northeast corner of the plat; the inlet does not show grade in the direction the arrows indicate. 4) 't -le recommend that this area of the drainage plan b2 reviewed by the engineering staff. We observed three steep channels entering the site from the south and one from the north. These channels carry water from significant drainage areas. Fill of the type proposed on lots 11, 43 and 42 in block 2 will not be adequate. The channel entering the stormwater pond through lots 12 and 13 will be difficult to restabilize after the ponding area cuts have been made. These channels pose serious problems for the stability of lots on this site. 5) In the erosion and sediment control plan, address how the channels entering the site and the fill n_laced within the channels will be stabilized and where offsite water will be directed. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL: Pio Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been submitted. The plan should follow the "Checklist" and "General Criteria" provided by the City of Eagan. Some specific information follows that may be useful in preparation of the plan. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES within two days of completion of rough grading, the entire site should be seeded and mulched to stabilize the disturbed areas. 6) Seeding and mulching details, as identified on the "Checklist", should be specified. Structural measures needed for erosion control on this site may include temporary gravel construction entrances, silt curtain , and storm sewer inlet filters. 7) Detailed plans and proposed location of the structural measures on a site map should be included. The lots on steeper areas need to be "benched"; this grading practice directs drainage into the hill and towards the ` street. i 8) Show the benching feature on the grading plan and provice a benching detail sheet. EROSIOF CONTROL NAMAGrMENT All erosion and sediment measures should be regularly inspected and maintained as needed. 9) The individual responsible for maintenance _rust be identified on the plan. 10) We recommend that a statement be placed on the development plan that the home builders will be responsible for E & SC during home construction. Construction schedules impact what erosion control measures will be necessary. 11) Include schedules for installing, utilities, revegetation of those disturbed areas, building construction and blac}:topping. Disposition of erosion and sediment control measures needs to be addressed. 12) Include a contact person responsible for final clean up of the site. CONCLUSIONS we have been in contact with Progress Engineering concerning other projects and have informed them about this erosion and sediment control program and our requirements for new plans. We hope that Erosion and Sediment Control Plans are submitted with future Preliminary Plats. We recommend that the Preliminary Plat be approved, but that an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan be submitted and the serious drainage concerns be addressed before a grading permit is issued or final Plat approval. cc: Warren Isrealson, Progress Engineering r 10 aa% If � .W D -II << /D-11INrH SD -II ° \ _•"figs: II W:•; a z�— : I I oa L i:• :iFT .: =3 WQ , W a � 0£ ON HVSD f °{ S C uG I 3.8J.OG.eO N r t a N r N a Y O a • - f J y ii a N C \ b Y W N N F 2 1Q ! L O z ., CL i OLL w •u m ��� ♦ � p �N a �' at� Ua ti Pry �' � le�• / j ~ ` 2t�`bs� J ♦ N "1 LL i - U L) Q Z b.l f , ff .6B M p1 G2CI J �WN S 3 iSSSYYY ZSSYSSY ............. ........... vf, a SYYYYSS YYSSYSYSZYSS � / SSSS SIYYYYZYSYYSSZSSSSY: Y Y SSYSSSS 9SZYISSYZ? } ............. 33 ------ - ----------------^_-_-- C6 " ---- csnA C?�. 3 M 89'38' 71*w COUNTRY HOLLOW SUBJECT U JECT PARCEL city of eagan SANITAR PUBLIC Y SEWER WORKS MASTER PLAN.", -DEPARTIVIENJ FIG. +2 1 approved: standard I plate #: N 3T'Hv -w J P- 3-d 884.0 891.9 �JP-29 926.0 945.0 Ir Lj ti f r.5 �J- %--w 8822 J -P JP- 201 8 0 6- 52. 855.6 JP -21 L.S.-17 8153 ^j 840..0 JP -55 J P-1 i P 54 64 885872 .4 //JP -23 1 852.2 8574 2 JP -?- 843.. 849. JP -25 JP- 0 8 64.0 3 1,� JP -22 817. 820.7824.0 880.4 840.0 ;00 ......... ...... . L.S. - I i P 896.0 ji806.0 904.0 s,8240 - ------- 11A 30 'IT J- tii -T I AUDITOR'S SUI NO. 4 L JP -30 BJP -28 --DL 873.0 87-9.4 ARE z J. N 3T'Hv -w J P- 3-d 884.0 891.9 �JP-29 926.0 945.0 Ir Lj ti f r.5 �J- %--w 8822 J -P JP- 201 8 0 6- 52. 855.6 JP -21 L.S.-17 8153 ^j 840..0 JP -55 J P-1 i P 54 64 885872 .4 //JP -23 1 852.2 8574 2 JP -?- 843.. 849. JP -25 JP- 0 8 64.0 3 1,� JP -22 817. 820.7824.0 880.4 840.0 ;00 ......... ...... . L.S. - I i P 896.0 ji806.0 904.0 s,8240 - ------- 11A 30 'IT J- tii 4/ 964.0 -971.7 879.0 884.3 NUT HILL 2--GL-P=50 =ARK 893. 844 JzI- ! KE LP -69 A 888.5 L.S 7 887.8 '-893 P LP -48"- t A -w 878.0 ` / l J -bb Tt L A R K L P-.:: -4 8RK -24 COUNTRY HOLLOW X -X SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. #1 city of eagan approved: standardn STORM SEWER late #: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN- -T I AUDITOR'S SUI NO. 4 L BJP -28 --DL "956.0 Q'I 969.4 H'-! JP -68 862.0 4/ 964.0 -971.7 879.0 884.3 NUT HILL 2--GL-P=50 =ARK 893. 844 JzI- ! KE LP -69 A 888.5 L.S 7 887.8 '-893 P LP -48"- t A -w 878.0 ` / l J -bb Tt L A R K L P-.:: -4 8RK -24 COUNTRY HOLLOW X -X SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. #1 city of eagan approved: standardn STORM SEWER late #: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN- RQAD�/ 12"! 67.0 ,14 38.4/56.0 71.0 V12" Li 58.0 50.3/67.0 La 179 1611 ,ORO 117 53.7% 7 2.O —door ftmw agoA 55.0 12' 116 66.7/85.0 r M.G. GROUND S,OZ,.".*-,> 5000 G.PM. BOOSTER H.W.L 1059 �186 .0/ *4% 2011 .. ... .. 1020 - -- 1: 187" 30 ............. 84:) 68.7/ 74.0QD 85 85.2/95.0 188 F74.4/82.0 16" ALDi,_­` SD. NO. 42 84.5/95-0 ............ . (809 ?011 1211 0 RylEr zoo 70.8 76.o` 1641 4, 11211 rT, F 11, _02-01 47.5 /6 3.0 50.6/66.0 �-�I- - - 4 3.7/ 10' 0 ,dkEWOOO 12,' ir COUNTRY HOLLOW 53A/72.6 SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. #3 City of eagan WATER approved. standard PUBLIC plate #: — WORKS co MASTER PLAN C� C4 m DEPARTIVIEN-d SANITARY SEWER TRUNK 37.87 Ac. STORM SEWER TRUNK 37.87 Ac. WATER AREA 37.87 Ac. I I � I .fw rwa.L•11Y I C 5 4 H. NO. 30 L -N- 5 APC Minutes April 30, 1987 COUNTRY HOLLOW ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing convened by Chairman Hall was in regard to the application of Progress Engineering, Inc. for the rezoning of approximately 45.47 acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a preliminary plat consisting of 99 lots, located in the west half of the southeast quarter of Section 24, abutting Diffley Road on the south and east of Dodd Road. Mr. Runkle introduced the proposal which included some difficult topography and future proposed access to Dodd Road, with only one access to Diffley Road. Mr. Warren Isrealson was present on behalf of the applicant and questioned the requirements for temporary turn-arounds. Mr. Colbert advised him that concrete curbs with an escrow for future removal would be required with a 55 foot radius for turn -around area. Mr. Don Klein, 4070 Dodd Road expressed concern regarding the potential ponding areas. Mr. Klein also indicated that he had not received a mailed notice in regard to the hearing. Mr. Runkle indicated that the standard notice procedure was used with the developer providing an abstractor's list of property owners within 350 feet. However, he indicated that notice would be sent also prior to the hearing before the City Council. In response to member Wilkins' questions, Mr. Colbert indicated that while single access to Diffley Road was shown for the development, future access was anticipated on Dodd Road. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family). All voted aye, except Hall who abstained due to a potential conflict of interest as owner of property adjacent to the property in question. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2'. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 3. Lot 1, Block 1, shall have a 30 foot setback or more along Diffley Road. 4. The City Council must authorize the installation of trunk water main and trunk storm sewer facilities necessary to service this development prior to final plat approval. 5. A 60 foot half right-of-way and easement must be dedicated for the future #30. All cul-de-saced streets shall have a 50 feet with all remaining through -streets of -way of 60 feet. 4 2� � a 20 foot construction upgrading of County Road minimum right-of-way of having a minimum right - APC Minutes April 30, 1987 6. In addition to the 10 foot common lot line drainage and utility easement, additional easements shall be dedicated of sufficient width to accommodate the installation of all required = storm sewer, water main and sanitary sewer facilities proposed to be located outside of,dedicated right-of-way. 7. This development shall provide and dedicate appropriate ponding easements providing for 63 acre feet of storage based on a controlled water elevation of 800.0 and a high water elevation of 818.0. 8. This development shall install the required channelization and related stabilization to convey existing drainage swales along proposed common lot lines into the existing storm sewer system. A minimum 20 foot drainage and utility easement shall be conveyed over these drainage channels. 9. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all easements outside the boundaries of this development as necessary to provide water service and trunk storm sewer force main outlets to serve this development in addition to any permanent or temporary construction easements necessary to accommodate temporary cul-de-sacs for dead-end streets. 10. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired in a time frame required by the affected agency. 11. The middle of the proposed three -street connections to the north shall be shortened and permanently cul-de-saced. 12. This development shall be responsible for all related assessment obligations associated with its approval. All voted yes except Hall who abstained for the same reason as previously indicated. It was noted this matter would be heard by the City Council on May 19, 1987. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - RESIDENTIAL STREET WIDTHS Chairman Hall convened the next public hearing concerning an amendment to the residential street width Ordinance. Mr. Runkle then introduced the proposed Ordinance amendment regarding residential street widths, allowing for variations based upon ADT (average daily trips). He indicated that the proposal was primarily the result of the Developer's Task Force's efforts. Mr. Rod Hardy who was present, and a member of the Developer's Task Force, indicated his concern that the Task Force had received no notice of the public hearing, nor that the draft had .been revised, deleting Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty PRELIMINARY PLAT/WILLIAMS AND LA RUE ADDITION II G. Williams and LaRue Addition II, Preliminary Plat for Five Single -Family Lots on 1.9 Acres --This five lot, 1.9 acre single family proposal was approved by the Advisory Planning Commission on April 25, 1985, subject to 12 conditions. Earlier that month the City Council denied the petition for utilities that would serve this parcel. This item never went to the City Council since the utility issue and assessment obligations could not be fully addressed until the Wescott Road improvements were finalized. The City Attorney's office has reviewed the request to proceed with the original plan and it is their opinion that this item would not need to go back to the APC for another public hearing. The applicant is in agreement with the original conditions and the adjoining property owners have been notified of the May 19 City Council meeting. Enclosed is the original staff report on pages through and also enclosed are APC minutes on page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled Williams and LaRue Addition II. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - WILLIAMS-LA RUE 2nd ADDITION APPLICANT: DALE LA RUE LOCATION: LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 1, WILLIAMS-LA RUE ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 25, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 12, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval of the Williams -LaRue 2nd Addition consisting of 5 single family lots on 1.9 acres. The proposal is located at the NE corner of Lexington Av. & Wescott Rd. ZONING & LAND USE: The parcel is zoned (R-1) residential single family and has an existing home along. Lexington Av. A .65 acre pond is next to Wescott Rd. & the east property line of the parcel. A major portion of the pond area would be filled to create land for proposed Lots 4 & 5. The parcel is bordered by Lexington Av. & Wescott Rd. to the west & south, single family houses are - _--to—the .north -.&-.east..__— --- - — --- ---- -- — — ---_---- CODE COMPLIANCE: The Preliminary Plat shows 80' & 81' lot. widths for Lot 4 & 5. This is due to an attempt to provide Lot 3 with sufficient width to allow for a 50' setback from Lexington Av. Lot 1 is shown with a 15' frontage on Wescott Rd. for a driveway access. City Code requires a 60' minimum frontage for platted lots. An alternative would be to create only 4 lots where each could meet the lot width requirements. GRADING & DRAINAGE: Existing drainage over this development is characterized by a. large ridge across Lot 2 where an existing home is located. This ridge slopes at 3:1 leading into a pond now covering the proposed pond area of Lot 1 and most of Lots 4 & 5 of this proposed development. This pond is connected by overland drainage to Pond JP 44 which is located to the north. Pond JP 44 has a positive outlet that was constructed under the Lexington Place South development. Proposed grading shows filling the southerly two-thirds of Lots 3, 4, & 5 and creating a ponding area along the rear lot lines of Lots 4 & 5 and in Lot 1. It will be the responsibility of this development to petition the City to install a 12" storm sewer line between the proposed ponding area and the storm sewer system in Lexington Square. Lexington Square is the development to the south. This 12" storm sewer will be the responsibility of the Storm Sewer Trunk Fund. SANITARY SEWER: The sanitary sewer required to serve this project was proposed under project number 442R. Project 422R was denied by the City Council due to lack of public support. WILLIAMS-LA RUE 2ND ADDITION APRIL 25, 1985 PAGE 2. k Sanitary sewer could be served, to this development, by extending a line west of a sub -trunk line located along the east property line of Parcel 030-53 (Barry Tilley). This sanitary sewer line would be the responsibility of this development to install because the property owner of Parcel 030-53 is presently being serviced by the trunk line of its east property line and therefore would not benefit by installation of a sanitary sewer line within Wescott Rd. WATERHAIN: An existing 181.' line is in place along the east side of Lexington Avenue. The City would require this development to petition for a 12" trunk line be installed down Wescott Road. Said 12" trunk line would be the responsibility of -the watermain trunk fund with this development responsible for lateral benefit costs. STREETS: Lexington Avenue borders this proposed development along the west and is an existing street classified as a minor arterial under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County Highway Department. The ultimate design of this roadway is 52' wide with bituminous surface, concrete curb and gutter and a 9 -ton load capacity. No new access to Lexington Avenue should be allowed. Wescott Road is an existing street, currently gravel, which borders this develop- ment to the south. Wescott Road is classified as a community collector. The ultimate design would be 52' wide, bituminous surface, and concrete curb and gutter with a 9 -ton load capacity. Since Wescott Road is classified as a City collector street, it will require a 6 -foot concrete sidewalk be constructed along the north side. This sidewalk would be the responsibility of this development. __.Staff _recommends _because of the projected high traffic volumes on Wescott Road that driveways be combined for Lots 3 & 4 and 1 & 5. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Both Wescott Road and Lexington Avenue currently have 50' half, right-of-way which should be adequate for future improvements. A 20 -foot utility easement will be required to be dedicated over the alignment of the 12" storm sewer line. Ponding and drainage easements will also be required around the ponding area and along the lot line of Lots 1 & 2 to connect with Pond JP 44. ION v WILLIAMS-LA RUE 2ND ADDITION APRIL 25, 1985 PAGE 3. CONDITIONS: 1. All standard Preliminary Plat conditions shall be adhered to. 2. If the 5 lot scheme is approved, a Variance shall be granted to allow the 15' frontage on Wescott Rd. 3. The filling of the pond area shall be done in conformance with MnDot speci- ficat.tans 2105 and 2451. 4. This development will be responsible for petitioning -for the installation, of a positive outlet from the ponding area and also the 12" trunk watermain. 5. No new access to Lexington Av be allowed. 6. A 6' concrete sidewalk along the north side of Wescott Rd shall be the responsibility of this development. 7. The driveways for Lots 3 & 4 and Lots 1 & 5 be combined with appropriate turn -grounds. 8. A 20' utility easement shall, be dedicated over the storm sewer line alignment. 9. Ponding & drainage easements will be required around the ponding area. ---10.—This- development.-.will-be.-responsible-_f.or.--.a11_unlevied _.trunk _-area_ rel.at-ed__.- _ assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. J4( A I ,t1 I X11; N^5 LIF R_2 SCI C 83. .7, P - TCitRKi LB 3 eSCD`' �.- LB. 82_2 - R-4 O'LEAhY PXRKj ADDITIO WE COTT ~� CARRIAGE Ll t , --H I Ls P i ter..A LE • FcpE IOU PF D..ON �:.. `.RAILS R`_- �! � :lit - %:. i�: � • - 1 I," l: ��•—s—= `r--�-..y ;—i!: �ee\ �.r� _ � i `f -34 t \ v; ___i I T Vt C _._.--....._.... 1 - - �",a-.i fir- —� T i T - 1 LEXINGTON ADD. - K SQUARE PK PD L 1--1175-1 NORTHVIEW PK - __ PF Preliminary Plat DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS INC Rpp-510te0 UnAM Lawq pl Th. SIM. of M,nnesola 14750 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 PHONE 612 623-1766 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1 _ I /40 —� :/40 I1 I � I- I PONDING'\_ L_ —104 _m 125 EASE MEKT-- .I j—_ /S co H 3Yr 4i,5 ro4L46.4-1;3#5. N; --_.; � L. so /SD I ,�. ROAD EASEMENT � l6' 4Z _ _ WE -S -GOT -Ti- ROAD I Owner -Developer: Joyce and Dale LaRue 3780 Lexington Avenue Eagan, MN 55123 Legal Description: Lots 3.and 4, Block 1, AND LARUE ADDITION. , i i WILLIAMS0 Present And Proposed Zoning: R-1 Proposed Lot Sizes: Lot 1 22691 Sq. Ft. Lot 2 21272 Sq. Ft. Lot 3 13410 Sq. Ft. Lot 4 12000 Sq. Ft. Lot 5 12 000 Sq. Ft. Road Easm. 1500 Sq. Ft. E Scale: 1 inch s 100 feet Proposed drainage & utility easements are to t 10 ft. in width and adjoining street lines anc 5 ft. in width and adjoining side and rear lot lines. Proposed Name: Williams And Larue 2nd Addition Notes: Z) Area to be served by sanitary sewer (Eagan Sanitary Sewer, Project No. 422R), water, and storm sewer. 2) Low area on Lots 4 and 5 to be filled and equal storage capaci. ty to be created by dredging ou- the northerly end of pond. Elevation of pond to be control' by proposed storm sewer outlet. 3) All lots to have minimum 5.0 foot w1de utility easements on each side of lot line: vr.::aw required. 10.00 foot wide easements along all streets. Date of Preparation: 4-1-85 NESOTA TIO NO. 8625 Revised: 4-10-85 ,1� 1 � RE ISTR �• f -w- � 1A) w'4'e � to Jz I fti")) S a v�ec,�ow f w x ea. W63eo7-7 ,eo,}D — -- z P,eoP056_J_) CORM) .lf 67)57)A/6 coM76OX 11 ,lAi�v� SGZo �✓D A-Av /T/D�+,/ ¢-/ 8S Y w x ea. W63eo7-7 ,eo,}D — -- z P,eoP056_J_) CORM) .lf 67)57)A/6 coM76OX 11 ,lAi�v� SGZo �✓D A-Av /T/D�+,/ ¢-/ 8S ," " I D 7 �4 -7 12 4 88.79' 8 L7s. P 7 o 0000,-z AO - Q=P 0_ n il. 4 !d -DP�10 848.0 OP 9 2 9 860.0 P- J 10 TO G-3 ,.jsc6i -9 2 -7i DP -23:-4 4 893 q DP -7:==.,- a .0 8976 PARK, 882-2: ADD! D WESCOTT CARRIAGE 12" i HILLS JP -14 110 0 OP -22 o0i, GARDEN )EN 8901 833.q) B9.2 - i : ---873 0 854.6- 2' IN 1882 0 JP -IE DP -25 L .886.4 -- Fiz4cEl JP -33 8 33 '74- 8-92.0. -832.0 79.1 JP -59 13 .,:-,J 882.0 8540 18P;,4 88ZO 864.0 8.7 '-""8940 7- jP '§, 2 67,? 6- 2 rp 901.5 8 ;360 97.j 8881 JP -60 895.5 a -41 1p 812 ��'JP 849.2^ 4-1 -- .: . 4,e 892.-.15 87:0 ,;,854J 161 -41 L.S.-I P 893.5 ie 12 !��.S6.0 JP L.S.- 11 885.3.. 887.0 12' -63 1J; C: 7 - JP -32 --UTA� --' �7-; 44-- 888. 876.3 "99, JP -II 9007 885.7 2 JP -31 P�. 830.0 /8840 895.7 880.4 0.7 8.95.-0 oil 21 j i J -m JP -19 30 48- .,JP-58'Z:a,k . )874-0 877.5 �2L 882 0 JP -10 J -P 820.8 -- - ------ -%',O�, JP -30 830.0 873.0 J -f Is. - 879.4 jp- 'Ll 77=: SQUARE 852s. 20 855.6 30. ip-PI % J. I5.3 8 0 84' .0 7 l000 WATCH 2 1 lie, J dd - j1%. \�• J -r PJ JP -34I ICK I J -S 819.S 884.0 JP -53 EAGAN, 891.9 864.0 820 830. PAqK 880.4 84C JP -29 926- 45.0 0:2 7-V ---�P8;1 0 t:s. .9 904ZI JP -51 I city of eagan PUBLIC 01 WORKS r'AC DA M TME ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL ................ ................ FIG. * 1 approved - standard STORM SEWER plate MASTER PLAN/� k-000 127 C -H2 :COITION S C a 10 C F(� S C -G- 7-7.7 �.7 30 ~'C -NN m 6:4:) 4T. 00.0 - Is C -pp ILLE - 60M C! m 15 27 27' 04 rF?I, K E' AGAN C — I I P69K 1-7 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAf�/,qA� FIG. *2 approved: standard I plate #: I city of eagan PUBLIC .1 WORKS co M IDA 0 Cm J., I TME I 111VI � L '23- 59.8/76.0 51.4/65.0 118.4/29.0 PAr.RwK � F�o a-; 0 Z. U,' EAGAN % PARK 6 M.G. GROUND STORAGE 5000 QRM. BOOSTERH.WL 1059 EO (i83) 176 68.0/82.0 ai (18288.0, 24 1020 680/"0%72 0- 'n. 184 68.7/74.0 35-5/50 0 238 121. F7: 185 1 = w 74A/82.0 186.0/91.0 EEL- 5UBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. *3. approved - standard I plate #: 105 )53. 2/68.Q-'- L w 16 AvnAj r L --:.NO. 2 JLKCN;Z, _E i I city of eagan PUBLIC .1 WORKS co M IDA 0 Cm J., I TME I 111VI � L '23- 59.8/76.0 51.4/65.0 118.4/29.0 PAr.RwK � F�o a-; 0 Z. U,' EAGAN % PARK 6 M.G. GROUND STORAGE 5000 QRM. BOOSTERH.WL 1059 EO (i83) 176 68.0/82.0 ai (18288.0, 24 1020 680/"0%72 0- 'n. 184 68.7/74.0 35-5/50 0 238 121. F7: 185 1 = w 74A/82.0 186.0/91.0 EEL- 5UBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. *3. approved - standard I plate #: r � APC Minutes April 25, 1985 WILLIAMS & LaRUE 2nd ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing convened by the Chairman concerned the application of Dale LaRue for preliminary plat approval of the Williams & LaRue 2nd Addition consisting of 5 single family lots on 1.9 acres. The location is at the northeast corner of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. Greg Ingraham introduced the proposal and noted the zoning is currently R-1. He stated that the City Council held a hearing regarding the utilities and that the affected property owners all opposed the improvements and therefore, the application for utility improvements was denied. Mr. LaRue was present and also Kelmer Bratland, owner of the property to the east. Mr. Bratland asked whether additional assessments would be levied against his property and also questioned the location of the street access. He opposed further assessments and opposed the access easement adjacent to the west line of the property. Mr. LaRue stated that he will re -petition for utilities and it was noted that the 15 foot strip along the west line would be for access to one lot only. Mr. Bratland also objected to filling in any portion of the pond in the proposed plat, but it was noted that the storm sewer outlet for the pond will be provided, according to Mr. Hefti. Member Trygg noted the three lots will require a variance below the 85 foot minimum lot width, and Member Mulrooney noted 4 lots will eliminate the need for any variances. Mr. LaRue opposed the reduction to four lots, noting lots to the north and to the south provide for as low as 60 foot frontage. There was discussion whether the 15 feet would be adequate for snow storage. Mr. Hefti noted that the side lot easement would add area for snow removal. After discussion, Harrison moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to approve the application, subject to the following: 1. A determination should be made as to the feasibility of the installation of utilities prior to final plat approval. 2. Variances shall be allowed in view of the configuration of the land in relation to the surrounding properties. 3. Standard preliminary plat conditions shall be adhered to. 1- 4. If the 5 lot scheme is approved, a variance shall be granted to allow the 15 foot frontage on Wescott Road. 5. The filling of the pond area shall be done in conformance with MnDOT specifications 2105 and 2451. 6. This development shall be responsible for petitioning for the installation of a positive outlet from the ponding area and also the 12 inch trunk watermain. 7. No new access to Lexington Avenue shall be allowed. 8. A 6 foot concrete sidewalk along the north side of Wescott Road shall be the responsibility of this development. %a�k6i Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One REVIEW AND CONSIDER TWO AND FIVE YEAR ACTION PLANS FOR EDC A. Review and Consideration of Two and Five Year Action -Plans for the Economic Development Commission --During the past four (4) months, the Economic Development Commission has held its monthly meeting and discussed a work plan for both a two year and five year projection. Enclosed on pages "throughc�S/ is a copy of the two year action plan and five year action plan as prepared by the EDC. Many of the items listed as work tasks will require monitoring by the EDC, however, some items will require more involvement by members of the Commission. Examples include the labor survey and public relations/promotional material. Some of the work tasks are ongoing from those work tasks identified previously by the EDC and City Council as a part of the Star City effort. Action is required by the City Council to confirm both the Two Year and Five Year Action Plans with or without modifications. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or modify the Eagan Two Year and Five Year Action Plans as presented by the Economic Development Commission. Resignation of David Kleimola Enclosed on page �6Q- is a letter from Dave Kleimola who is resigning as a member of the Eagan Economic Development Commission due to the sale of his business and the fact that he is not a resident of the City of Eagan. The City Administrator would like direction regarding a replacement for Mr. Kleimola who represents small retail. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve and accept the resignation of David Kleimola as a member of the Eagan Economic Development Commission. a 41 EAGAN TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN ASSIGNMENT MATRIX �� Q WORK TASKS ASSIGNMENT STAFF COMMISSION COMPLETION DATE 1. Update Five -Year City Administrator Community July 1, 1987 Capital Improvement Public Works Assessment Plan Director 2. Update Labor Survey City Administrator Industrial Oct. 1, 1987 City Planner Call 3. Solid Waste Study Solid Waste Community Dec. 31, 1987 Abatement Comm. Assessment 4. Review Financing and City Administrator Community Jan. 1, 1988 Economic Development Assessment Tools including Eco- nomic Development Authority and Revolving Fund 5. Review Zoning Code City Planner June 1, 1987 Classifications In- cluding Freeway Category 6. Upgrade County/ Public Works Jan. 1, 1988 City Collector Roads Director 7. 24 Hour Emergency City Administrator July 1, 1987 Care Center City Planner 8. Update Star City City Administrator Public Nov. 1, 1987 Book, Slide Set, Relations Promotional Materials & Review Promotional Material 9. Develop Categorized City Administrator Public Oct. 1, 1987 Presentation File Relations 10. Review Industrial City Administrator Industrial Sept. 1, 1987 Call Process/Budget Call Review Industrial Mix - 11. Monitor Airport City Administrator Jan. 1, 1988 Adequacy Developments �� Q EAGAN FIVE YEAR ACTION PLAN ASSIGNMENT MATRIX WORK TASKS ASSIGNMENT COMPLETION DATE STAFF COMMISSION 1. Promote Large and City Administrator Public Small Retail City Planner Relations Facilities 2. Construct Eagan Park & Rec. Dir. Public Community Center City Administrator Relations 3. Promote Seneca Director of Treatment Plant Public Works Expansion 4. Develop 5 -Year Director of Major Street Plan Public Works 5. Develop Schedule of Director of Trunk Utility Public Works Completion 6. Develop Commercial- City Administrator Industrial Industrial Databases City Planner Call 7. Identify and Study City Planneg Industrial Call Redevelopment Needs City Administrator and Community Assessment 8. Assess Airport City Administrator Impacts and Alternatives 9. Assess Mass Transit City Planner Community Needs Public Works Assessment Director 1987-1989 1989 1989 1987-1989 1987-1989 1987-1990 1988 1987-1991 1987-1988 10. Monitor Concepts City Planner Community 1987-1988 of Senior Life Assessment Style Housing 11. Monitor Legislative City Administrator Industrial Call Action City Planner a�l PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL MANAGEMENT COMPANY Yankee Square / East Professional Building 3435 Washington Drive / Eagan, Minnesota 55122 612/452-8300 Telex 495-0772 April 22, 1987 Mr. Larry Wenzel Chairman Eagan Economic Development Commission Subject: Resignation of David L. Kleimola, Secretary SEDC Dear Chairman and Fellow Commission Members, In lieu of the fact that Professional Travel Management Co.,Inc. has been sold to Meeting & Travel Concepts,Inc. of Eden Prairie, and .the management of Meeting 8 Travel Concepts has decided not to maintain an Eagan.retail office outlet, I feel it is necessary to resign from the commission as a representative of the retail business community and as your secretary. After four years of service during an exciting growth period in Eagan, and a period in which the city has scored many pluses:i.e. Star City status, freeway opening, Town Center, Sperry addition, Northwest Airlines, 24 Hour Medical Facility, High School, and rapid commercial and residential expansion, I find it difficult to have to give -up a "winner". �� I wish Eagan, the city staff and members of the commission continued success in your most worthy goals:..and objectives. Respe tf lly, David L. Kleimola Executive Vice President PTM Co. Secretary, Eagan Economic Development Commission �®� International Air Transport Association �� ARC Airlines Reporting Corporation Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two RESOLUTION/PART 150 STUDY B. Resolution Concerning the MAC FAR Part 150 Study --The City has received a copy of the Part 150 Study which is approximately 3" in thickness and must respond to a public hearing that will be held on May 21 at the MAC general offices. The FAR Part 150 submittal describes two documents to be submitted to the FAA by the Metropolitan Airports Commission which is elected to conduct the Part 150 program. The noise exposure map defines the noise compatibility problem and the noise compatibility program describes the operational land use solutions. The Part 150 submittal builds upon the extensive work completed since the early 1970's in noise abatement, including the 1981 noise abatement operations plan and to integrate the operational actions which land use management actions geared toward both preventative and corrective land use measures to provide a comprehensive program. Since the record only remains open for five (5) working days after the public hearing, it was appropriate for staff to prepare a resolution concerning the Part 150 Study. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein has prepared a lengthy resolution which attempts to address issues of importance to the City of Eagan. After the record is closed, the document and comments will be referred to a MAC committee for a final report to the MAC. Final MAC action, submitting the documents to the FAA is expected on June 15. For a copy of the resolution concerning the MAC Far Part 150 Study, refer to the resolution enclosed on pages c [ through o"7�. For a copy of the eAecutive summary prepared for Part 150 submittal, refer to pagesc;7S_T through cQR 1 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve with or without modification the resolution entitled "A Resolution Concerning the MAC FAR Part 150 Study." as3 CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE MAC FAR PART 150 STUDY WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) has undertaken the Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 Study for purposes of providing a comprehensive noise abatement plan and procuring federal funding assistance for the implementation of such plan, and WHEREAS, FAR Part 150 requires a review and assessment of both operational and land use alternatives appropriate to the region, and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has and continues to support the airport as a regional amenity and with respect to its environment, has and continues to support noise abatement strategies and the study of alternatives to reduce noise impacts from current levels, and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has anticipated noise impacts to the extent possible based upon representations of the MAC and the FAA and has maintained or modified land use planning and zoning to provide a substantial area of compatible land use, and WHEREAS, the MAC has recommended a Noise Compatibility Program as part the FAR Part 150 submittals incorporating both operational and land use elements and has requested comment on the program from the public and effected agencies at a public hearing on May 21, 1987, and WHEREAS, the conduct of the FAR Part 150 Study process has resulted in an uneven treatment of its elements, input regarding those elements and the effected communities and, therefore, conclusions of widely varied substance and adequacy, and WHEREAS, given the qualifications above, the City of Eagan finds certain elements of the Noise Compatibility Plan to be reasonable and supportable and others to be unnecessarily detrimental, poorly substantiated and absent adequate public notice given the gravity of their impact, - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan supports the general concept of the FAR .Part,1,50 Study Noise Abatement Program and its operational elements with the following qualifications; 1. NA2 - Exempt the Quietest Stage 3 Aircraft from Noise Abatement Flight Tracks - Differential analysis does not yet exist to substantively justify the costs of this systematic degradation of noise abatement flight tracks such as those in the Eagan - Mendota Heights Corridor. Moreover, the inclusion of DC-10, L- 1011 and 7147 aircraft in the Stage 3 definition places an undue burden on residential areas when commercial -industrial alternatives exist. Absent adequate analysis and public process, the City cannot support this element. . 2. NA3 - Negotiate with the Airlines a User Fee to be Levied on Landings by Stage 1 and Stage 2 Aircraft, with Revenues to be Used for Noise Compatibility Programs -The City of Eagan strongly supports the use of differential landing fees to increase operating costs for noisier aircraft. By introducing ash an economic disincentive, airlines' financial decisions will tend toward quieter aircraft while dedicating the proceeds to the reduction of noise impacts. 3. NA4 - Relocate Runway 4-22 to the South of Runway 11L -29R -The City of Eagan reserves comment on this element until full documentation of its impacts is available. The obvious benefits of the relocation to the Preferential Runway System (PRS) may be offset by new or expanded effected populations. If the extension is necessary to expand airport capacity, it should be analyzed in that light, but its noise abatement benefit must be proven before the City can support it. 4. NA? - Negotiate New and Binding Agreements with the Operators for Nighttime Use; et. seq -The City of Eagan strongly supports the maintenance of low volumes of nighttime operations as such are among the most detrimental to an acceptable noise environment. 5. NA9 - Obtain FAA Agreement to Implement the Cedar Avenue Procedure for Aircraft Departing Runway 22 -The City of Eagan reserves comment on this element until full documentation of its impacts is available. It is not yet proven that the procedure enhances PRS capacity, abates noise or will be flown under the Part 150 Study assumptions. Absent adequate documentation, support of this element would not be appropriate. 6. NA10 - Tighten Up Procedures for Keeping Aircraft Departing Runways 11 L and 11 R to the "Eagan Corridor" -The City of Eagan introduced this element of the Part 150 Study and believes the concept to be integral to its support of the study. To date, however, it has not been adequately addressed. a. Established Corridor - The established land use corridor was based on representations of the MAC and FAA concerning historic f light track assumptions. These assumptions are no longer in use by the tower. b. Prescribed Procedure - The City of Eagan requested a review of the procedur.e.in place at the outset of the Part 150 Study. The procedures were modified in a tower order dated ten days after the Eagan request. In essence, the consultant then studied compliance with a procedure implemented after the study began, bearing marginal. relationship to the land use provided. c. Non -Compliance - The consultant's "compliance study" which identifies eighteen percent non-compliance lasted less than one day and has not been supported by recent MAC and HNTB studies. Moreover, these studies have shown up to two- thirds of all departures are more than five degrees deviant from the established land use corridor assumptions. a 5-s'- d. Impact. - The consultant's conclusion of minor impact as a result .of corridor compliance was graphically refuted by comparison of its original and modified Part 150 base maps. Dramatic variations in impact area resulted from modified concentrations within the same operational area. Therefore, substantial benefits can accrue from adequate operational standards. e. Qualified Support - The City must predicate its support of the Part 150 Study on the adequate study of and acceptable findings concerning the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor. A study has been approved by the MAC to address the best means of utilizing appropriate flight track modifications to place the worst of the impact at the middle of the compatible land use. Only upon acceptable completion of the study, will the City endorse this element of the Program. 7. NA12 - Enforce and Optimize Nighttime Run-up Policy -The City of Eagan strongly supports the enforcement of the nighttime run up policy. Further, it encourages the installation of equipment and adoption of procedures necessary to mitigate run-up noise impacts. 8. NA13 - Improve the Monitoring and Enforcement of All Noise Abatement Measures -The City of Eagan strongly supports this element, particularly with respect to off -airport noise monitoring. Permanent monitoring locations should be located in noise sensitive areas of all noise impacted communities. 9. NA14 - Install a Microwave Landing System at MSP -The City of Eagan strongly supports the early installation of MLS and other navigational aid systems to better control flight tracks and altitudes over the effected communities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan supports the FAR Part 150 Study Noise Abatement Program land use elements with the following qualifications: 1. Preventative Land Use Measures (LU1-LU5) - The City'of Eagan is generally compliant with the Metropolitan Council Guidelines. Further it supports the concepts of zoning performance standards and the necessary building code revisions to implement them. 2. Corrective Land Use Measures (LU6-LU10) - The City of Eagan will consider -soundproofing of public and private buildings,. acquisition of developed property and purchase guarantees as potential corrective strategies, provided the City has the right of review and approval of any such program. The City will only consider these alternatives when operational means of noise abatement have been exhausted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan does not recognize the validity of the 1987 and 1992 Noise Exposure Maps upon which the land use elements are predicated because: 1. Flight track assumptions in the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor area are neither historically supported nor consistant with the cited Metropolitan Council guidelines. a s& 2. Flight track assumptions in the Eagan -Mendota Heights area fan air traffic unnecessarily thereby impacting residential areas and underutilizing the noise absorbing capacity of the compatible corridor. 3. No differential analysis exists showing current operations to be the most effective use of the noise compatible corridor. 4. Certain residential areas lying within the Ldn 65 contour are not depicted as such and certain noise sensitive public facilities are misrepresented or omitted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff be directed to prepare oral and written comments consistent with these findings for introduction into the public record of the Metropolitan Airports Commission. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1987. E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan as7 S MINNEAPOLIS -SAINT PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Federal Aviation Regulation Part 150 Study SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS SUMMARY REPORT MAY 1987 Prepared by HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF Table of Contents Figures Follows Page Figure 1. Noise Exposure Map 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Figure 2. Noise Exposure Map 1992 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table Follows Page Noise Compatibility Program Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 X59 Page Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Consultation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • • • 2 Noise Exposure Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Noise Compatibility Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Noise Abatement Measures . . . . . . . . • • . • • • • • • • 6 Land Use Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Preventive Land Use Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Corrective Land Use Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Figures Follows Page Figure 1. Noise Exposure Map 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Figure 2. Noise Exposure Map 1992 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table Follows Page Noise Compatibility Program Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 X59 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the FAR Part 150 documents to be submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). These submittals describe the Noise Exposure Maps and the- proposed Noise Compatibility Program for Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 was promulgated by the FAA in 1984 in compliance with the Airport Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979. Its stated objectives include: o establishing a uniform system of describing aircraft noise and noise exposure nationally, to eliminate confusion resulting from use of different descriptors in different communities; o describing land use compatibility criteria for the guidance of local communities, but recognizing that these criteria will be influenced by local values and factors; and o providing technical assistance to airport operators and other governmental agencies to prepare and execute noise compatibility planning and implementation programs. The stress is on programs of actions which provide a balanced and coordinated programmatic response to the problems, rather than the piece- meal response which has, in the past, typified the reaction of many communities. To this end, a comprehensive listing of categories of measures to be addressed is included in the regulation, categories which include noise abatement and land use management actions.. The approach adopted in the study at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) was to build upon the extensive work completed since the early 1970's in noise abatement, including the 1981 Noise Abatement Operations Plan, and to integrate the operational actions with land use management actions to provide a comprehensive program. The regulation describes two documents to be submitted to the FAA by airport operators electing to conduct a Part 150 program. The Noise Exposure Map (NEM) defines the noise compatibility problem, and the Noise Compatibility Program (NCP)' describes the operational and land use solutions. The FAR Part 150 submittal for Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport includes both the Noise Exposure Maps and the Noise Compatibility Program in a single package. The complete set of Part 150 submittal documents is available for public review at the offices of the Metropolitan Airports Commission, 6040 28th Avenue South, Minneapolis. f pp CONSULTATION The FAR Part 150 Compatibility Program recommendations were developed under the auspices of the MetropolitanA-rcraftSound Abatement Council (MASAC), the established forum for the consideration of aircraft noise abatement in the Minneapolis -St. Paul area. In addition, consultations were conducted with the individual agencies where appropriate. The development of the noise compatibility program was part of an on-going process that goes back to the early 1960s. Significant items in this process follow. - Formulation of the current noise abatement program, which has been subject to continuing revision to meet changing needs and conditions since it was first put in place in 1969. - Preparation of the Noise Abatement Operations Plan in 1981. - Adoption of the Metropolitan Council land use guidelines and policy contour in 1983. - Activities by MAC and Governors Task Force in 1986 to find a solution to growing public concern regarding noise. - The continuing activities of the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council since 1969. - The continuing activities of MAC staff. In the development of the recommended program, the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council was the primary means of disseminating information to the public and of receiving data and comments from airport users, concerned agencies and groups, and members of the public. There were other opportunities for public participation in the development of the recommendations. These included the Governors Task Force on Airport Noise, which presented its recommendation in a report dated January 2, 1986; the Metropolitan Airports Commission, which recommended a seventeen point program of noise compatibility measures on January 7, 1986, and a more extensive program of noise abatement actions in April 1986; and the Noise Budget Working Group, established by MAC in May of- 1986 to examine the feasibility of a noise budget ordinance and to report to the Commission in November of 1986. Air carriers and other airport users are members of MASAC and participated in discussions of noise compatibility measures. Attachment 10 to the full set of Part 150 documents includes further details of the consultation process. a�� All meetings of.MASAC, as well as those of other committees and task forces concerned with airport noise, were open to the public. Many meetings included opportunity for public comment during the development of the recommendations. Additional meetings were held principally to provide a forum for public comment. A public hearing on the Part 150 noise compatibility program for Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport will be held in late May. Following that hearing and consideration of public comments, the Part 150 documents will be revised and formally.submitted to the FAA. 11 11 WO NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS The NEM submittal consists of two maps, one depicting existing conditions, and one showing noise exposure for aircraft activity forecast five years in the future. The existing and 1992 Noise Exposure Maps for Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport are presented as Figures 1 and 2. Originals of these maps, at a scale of one inch to 2000 feet, are available for inspection at the offices of 'the Metropolitan Airports Commission. The Noise Exposure Maps show noise contours for existing and future aircraft operations at MSP. The noise descriptor used on the NEM is the Day -Night Noise Level (DNL or Ldn). The use of the Ldn metric is specified in FAR Part 150 to provide a uniform system of evaluating aircraft noise exposure nationally. Ldn is a widely accepted noise descriptor and is recognized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and by many state and local agencies as an appropriate measure of community noise exposure from a variety of sources. Ldn is the 24-hour energy -averaged sound level in A -weighted decibels, with a 10 decibel penalty added to noise events between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The Ldn values and contours (lines connecting points of equal Ldn) were calculated using the Integrated Noise Model (INM) Version 3.8. The INM is a computer model that uses as its inputs the numbers of aircraft operations, fleet mix, time of day, runway use, takeoff and landing profiles, flight tracks, and other factors. The flight tracks used in the model are depicted on the NEM. The Noise Exposure Maps show contours of Ldn 65, Ldn 70, and Ldn 75. The future noise contours assume the implementation of the additional noise abatement measures recommended in the Noise Compatibility Program. The maps also show land uses in the vicinity of the airport and the areas of land use that are not compatible with the aircraft noise levels within each contour. The non -compatible land uses are determined by the compatibility criteria developed by the FAA and included in FAR Part 150. Generally, all land uses are considered compatible with noise levels below Ldn 65. The locations of noise sensitive public buildings are indicated on the Noise Exposure Maps. Properties on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places are also located on the map. The estimated population residing within each contour is presented in the following table. E Ldn Estimated Population Within Contour Contour Existing Future (1992) -------------------------------------------- 65-70 Ldn 14,520 11,456 70-75 Ldn 3,820 2,152 75+ Ldn 204 53 TOTAL 65+ Ldn 18,544 13,661 The existing and future Ldn 65 contours lie within a portion of Hennepin and Dakota Counties. In Hennepin County, the contours affect parts of the cities of Minneapolis, Bloomington and Richfield. In Dakota County, the contours affect parts of Mendota Heights and Eagan. A number of other public and planning agencies also have jurisdiction within the Ldn 65 contour. The Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area is the regional planning agency for the.seven-county area and has the role of reviewing the comprehensive land use plans of the local communities. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (PCA), a state agency, has the responsibility for control of noise throughout the state. 0 -a N O Ln a CL w 0� r : a N Q F • • W � � 7 W Z y ° O 7 L Z • • • •° (� •• • E • GLU O • 1 i O J W ° S H O O • ==;a�.d O ° O: e /z e CL ° E ° .. i. W o s ` a E a e: o, e n = a Z 2 y r x u 1 u s° > Z i� v u. d H I Z i I- OD 0) T. CL m d N O CL K W 44 O ` Z .7 0 L r� L L 0 Q. L_ _ .C_ _ L _ a CL _ �n N — 0 Q a a� N N • N S O F Z i • • a W • s � C - � � O � j � `' N Lu � N y9 e Lu J S N °•Iz •O. r N _ y 0 r S- 0 •t ! O• O O 9 : N s Z V Z U ° V > z u V< �I Z i�F• ■ ♦� a d v_ ari s a I S I v LL cCo, (o NOISE COMPA IEILIT'Y PROGRAM -ise compatibility program measures fall into two basic ='t are noise abatement or Operational measures, which have ar reducing noise exposure in the populated areas near ?aul International Airport. Second are land use management are tbsigned to eliminate existing non -compatible uses and :tern of cDmpatible land uses in the airport vicinity. 3f identifying noise abatement and land use measures to be 'art 130 Noise Compatibility Program included: by MASAC and MAC staff of potential measures; .on of measures and review with airport users and agencies; idation by MASAC to MAC; f action program by MAC. This implemerts certain of the !commendations, identifies measures which should be studied detail, and prepares one measure beyond the program :ded by MASAC, mainly installation of an MLS at MSP. EASURES se abatement measures are recommended in the Noise gram for Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. They =eTher vi.th an assessment of the relative contribution of :festiveness. :3t byordinance a i International A rt, -in noise budget for Minneapolis- rt, innea olis- ;AC recommendation of March 27, 1986, was that a noise abung the lines of that in place at McArthur/Islip Airport grated for MSP. The MAC Noise Abatement Program of May :plemented this recommendation by establishing a working -th the assignment of evaluating the feasibility of such ;nanr_e and reporting back to the Commission in November Me zeport of the working group, together with a draft z*, -and. associated documents, appears as Attachment 6 to i Mittal, available for inspection at the MAC offices. ft ordibance was the subject of a public hearing conducted :arp 2$, 1987. Upon review of the comments from the .from agencies and from airlines, MAC staff has coded a revised version of the ordinance which would i10 the restrictions an the amount of noise energy :gal operators would be allowed to make. This' revised of the ordinance is proposed as a measure in the Noise oility program. 4 The phased -in ordinance, as proposed, would initially (June 1987) cap total airport noise at 124.9 EPNdB, a level 11 percent below the noise energy produced in August 1986. The cap would then be phased down annually, to 124.8 in 1988, 124.6 in 1989, 124.5 in 1990, 124.4 in 1991, and• 124.2 in 1992. This final cap represents 1984 noise levels, is a reduction of 24 percent in noise energy from August 1986, and is the level projected for 1992 operations assuming that schedules for introduction of quiet aircraft currently on order by the airlines at MSP are met. The major provisions for the ordinance include the following: - a guaranteed minimum level of noise for any airline currently serving the airport; - a set-aside of noise energy for a minimum of three new - entrant airlines flying three daily B-727-200 flights, and potentially many more airlines flying quieter aircraft; - the ability for incumbent airlines to temporarily use noise energy not being utilized by new -entrant airlines; - an allocation of the remaining noise to incumbent airlines based on historical level of service, favoring operators of quiet aircraft; - the ability for airlines to buy and sell noise from other airlines, while maintaining the overall airport cap; - the exemption of general aviation, federal, and state operators from the provisions of the ordinance; and - penalties and sanctions for airlines not in compliance with the provisions of the ordinance. NA2. Exempt the quietest Stage 3 aircraft from noise abatement flight tracks. This would provide a small benefit to the carriers for introducing new generation Stage 3 aircraft and could be a factor in reducing Stage 2 operations with only minor costs in terms of noise over new areas. Changes in noise would not be large enough to bring about any revision of the noise contours. This recommendation was endorsed by MAC in the May 1986 Noise Abatement Program. R NA3. Ne tiate with the airlines a user fee to be levied on landi ,taae 1 and Stage 2 aircraft, with revenues to be used noise compatibility programs. or A large differential fee on Stage 1 and 2 landings of $860 at night and up to $430 during the day would result in the elimination of 98 percent of night and 6 percent of daytime operations by these categories of aircraft. Major noise reductions would occur to the southeast and southwest of the airport, primarily as a result of the virtual elimination of night operations; minor improvements would be experienced over South Minneapolis and Highland Park. At a lesser level of differential, no Stage 2 aircraft would be eliminated from the fleet, but the differential fee could provide funding for the corrective :.and use compatibility measures described below. The noise abatement benefits of the modest differential fee scale would be insignificant. The measure is proposed for inclusion in the program, with accounting procedures and level of differential to be determined after further study. NA4. Relocate Runway 4-22 to the south of Runway 11L -29R. This measure would permit significant increases in use of the Preferential Runway System (PRS) without the imposition of a slot allocation system. As a result, about one-third of the overflights over South Minneapolis would be shifted to less populated areas south of the airport, yielding good middle -term noise benefits to this part of the vicinity even without any restriction on levels of operations. This benefit would occur because the improved capacity of the 29/22 PRS would permit its use for a larger part of the day when winds permit. The measure would have the effect of shifting some noise impacts from the South Minneapolis area to Richfield and Bloomington off Runway 4-22, an area that experienced significant overflight until the increase in traffic levels limited PRS utilization. This measure is currently the subject of an Environmental Assessment analysis. NA5. Reduce general aviation activities by providing incentives to relocate at other airports. There will be a component of general aviation, air taxi service, and FBO functions that provides essential services at MSP, which will not and should not move to another airport. The shift of the non-essential operations would leave small but worthwhile noise benefits. The increased use of the PRS in the short-term would decrease overflights over South Minneapolis for the equiva- lent of one hour on the average day, and increase overflights southwest of the airport over Bloomington. In 1990, some use of the PRS would still be possible with this measure in effect. V The MAC Noise Abatement Program includes a number of actions which would implement this measure, including the following: installation of the ILS at Airlake; completion as soon as possible of the on-going improvement program at St. Paul Downtown Airport; accelerated program of improvements at Anoka and Airlake airports; - restricted construction of new corporate and general aviation .hangars at MSP. The revised forecasts of air activity (January 1987) assume that the incentives program, together with a current downward trend in the -levels of general aviation activity at MSP, will result in a reduction from 106,700 operations in 1985 to about 75,600 operations in 1992. The noise effects in levels of jet aircraft use of the PRS is included in calculation of the 1992 Noise Exposure Map. The benefits of this measure in its contribution to program effectiveness would be minor. NA6. Assign propeller aircraft to Runways 11L -29R and 11R -29L when the PRS is in use. The noise benefits would be those associated with use of the Preferential Runway System, reduced overflights of South Minneapolis and increased operations to the southwest where the adverse effects of overflight can be better ameliorated. The measure is implemented by ATC today when a large number of light aircraft arrivals is experienced. Maximization of the measure could extend by a small amount the number of daytime hours that the preferential runways are currently used. In the long term, projected increases in traffic will minimize the potential noise benefits to be derived from this measure, since use of the preferentials would be all but eliminated during the daytime hours by the volume of turbojet operations alone. The measure is a proposed program action. The benefits in terms of evaluated utilization of the PRS would be minor, but in conjunction with other similar measures, the aggregate effect would be significant. NA7. Negotiate new and binding agreements with the operators for nighttime use; if this cannot be achieved in six months, regulate the number of nighttime operations (11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.) to current levels. No effects on existing noise levels would result. The value of the measure would be to ensure that future nighttime noise does not exceed today's levels. Q ado NA8. Extend the ni httime restricted hours to 11:00 .m. to 8:00 a.m. on Saturday and Sunday mornings. If the restriction is made mandatory, the weekend restriction would remain voluntary. The extension would be applied in two phases, 11:00 F.m. - 7:00 a.m. on weekends immediately, and 11:00 p.m. - 8:00 a.m. on weekends in 1988. Operations by Stage 3 aircraft in the 6:00 a.m.- 8:00 a.m. time frame would not be subject to the restriction. The principal noise benefits that would be accrued would be the reduction in potentially.disruptive overflights during the late evening and early morning hours on weekends. Mosc of the benefits would be accrued southeast and southwest of the airport, where nighttime activity is concentrated. NA9. Obtain FAA agreement to implement the Cedar Avenue procedure for aircraft departing Runway 22. FAA policy, at the time of preparation of this report, is not to implement the 1800 departure heading for south and southeast -bound aircraft departing Runway 22, despite a formal request from MAC that this procedural turn be instituted as a standard procedure. This turn is critical to the effectiveness of the program. It is strongly recommended that this be pursued with FAA on the basis that use of the Preferential Runway System (and Runway 22 for departures) would be significantly increased over current use, if the program is implemented. An Environmental Assessment of this procedure would be required. NA10. Tighten up procedures for keeping aircraft departing Runways 11L and 11R to the "Eagan Corridor." Eighteen percent of aircraft currently fly outside of the corridor, most of them to meet ATC safety regulations. Observed deviation from the established corridor by some aircraft was apparently not necessary, and stricter compliance by ATC could reduce such incidents. The improved compliance would apply to deviation both. to the north and south of the established corridor. The measure is to encourage ATC to utilize headings for departure off Runways 11L and 11R that keep aircraft in the designated Eagan corridor, except where safety considerations dictate diver- sions outside of the corridor. The Noise Exposure Maps utilize the split of traffic observed in 1986 surveys. The change in the noise contours which would result from improved compliance with the established procedures would be insignificant, but this does not fully represent the benefits which would be perceived by residents of the affected areas. This measure would have a small impact on overall program effectiveness, but would be important from the perspective of affected communities. 0 all NAll. Test use of I-494 corridor for aircraft departing Runway 22. The noise abatement program includes measures to enhance use of the PRS, so this measure will become much more important in handling Runway 22 departures such that noise impacts are minimized. The procedure would shift noise impacts from residential areas to the I-494 commercial corridor. The analysis of mitigating measures in the Environmental Assessment of the extension of Runway 4-22 will include detailed evaluation of the benefits from use of noise abatement departure headings, including use -of the I=494 corridor. The noise benefits would be significant in terms of overall program effectiveness. Additional documentation of the benefits will be identified as analysis of the 4-22 extension continues. NA12. Enforce and optimize MAC nighttime -run -UD Dolicy. Review of sample monitoring records for periods between February 1984 and July 1985 indicates that of 288 run -ups recorded in the 9:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. time frame, sixty-nine occured in the curfew hours of 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. of these 69, 49 either started prior to 11:00 p.m. and finished after that hour, or started prior to 6:00 a.m. extending beyond 6:00 a.m., or occurred wholly within the hours immediately after the start or immediately_ before the termination of curfew hours. The balance occurred at other hours during the night. Enforcement of the measure would probably remove some of these potentially disturbing noise incidents from hours when they are most prone to disturb sleep, though the incidents would not be eliminated, due to the exemption for "emergencies." The contribution of the measure in terms of overall program effectiveness would be very small, amounting to a potential reduction of 18 seconds of take -off thrust power on the average night with peak noise levels of 65-75 dBA in nearby residential areas. NA13. Improve the monitoring and enforcement of all noise abatement measures. The effect probably would be small for individual items, but a general tightening -up on procedures could provide a noticeable improvement overall, especially in removing individual noise inc,idents which are clearly in violation of established procedures. The series of small changes is difficult to quantify and cannot be described in terms of changes in the Ldn contours. The effect in terms of overall program effectiveness would be more important with respect to public perception than would be indicated by the noise contours. o The Metropolitan Airports Commission proposed a series of actions in this area, namely: - sensitivity sessions with air traffic. controllers; - sensitivity sessions with pilots; - letter to the CEOs of airlines; - formal communication of MAC concerns to ATC; - increase in MAC noise abatement personnel; and - installation of off -airport, permanent monitoring system. NA14. install a Microwave Landing Svstem at MSP. Microwave Landing Systems (MLS) will ultimately permit pilots to fly varying glide angles and curved approaches to runway ends. Chese features, however, will not be available until the mid to Late 1990s. By the late 1990s, the variable glide angle feature could provide some minor noise benefits beyond one or two miles from the runway. The curved approach capability would only provide benefits beyond three miles from the runway. This measure would have only a small impact in terms of overall program effectiveness. LAND USE MEASURES The recommended program of land use management measures consists of two types of measures. First are the preventive_ land use controls, which will be exercised within areas defined by the Metropolitan Council's Policy Contour and consistent with the criteria spelled out in the Aviation Chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide. The second type of land use management measure is corrective actions, which are intended to alleviate noise effects in existing areas of incompatible land use and which will generally be applied to areas within the 1992 Ldn 65 contour. Preventive Land Use Measures The MAC "Noise Abatement Program endorses a Metropolitan Council policy of encouraging jurisdictions within the MC Policy Contour to enact plans and land use controls which are consistent with the Metropolitan Development Guide. The policies would have less direct effect on the more fully developed areas of Minneapolis, St. Paul, Richfield, and Bloomington, but would have more effect on communities south and east of the Minnesota River, which are less developed. Any redevelopment within the area would be subject to the provisions of the Guidelines. Specific preventive measures are described below. 73 LUl. Amend local land use plans to bring into conformance with the Metropolitan Council's noise compatibility guidelines. In coordination with the Metropolitan Council, local jurisdictions would review their comprehensive plans to determine if amendments are required to conform with the Guidelines for Land Use Compatibility with Aircraft Noise contaiied in the Metropolitan Development Guide, Aviation Chapter. Implementation assistance may be available for jurisdictions within the Ldn 65 noise contour. In terms of overall program effectiveness, this measure is necessary to apply regulatory actions which will inhibit non -compatible development. LU2. Zone for compatible development. Local jurisdictions would review existing zoning in Airport Noise Zones to determine consistency with the Guidelines for Land Use Compatibility with Aircraft Noise. They would rezone for compatible development if such rezoning is consistent with other community development factors. Federal grants for implementation assistance may be available for jurisdictions within the Ldn 65 noise contour. The proposed action provides an important regulatory mechanism for preventing future non -compatible uses in the noise zones. LU3. Application of zoning performance standards. In coordination with the Metropolitan Council, local jurisdic- tions would adopt the Model Ordinance for Aircraft Noise Attenuation developed by the Metropolitan Council. Federal implementation assistance may be available for jurisdictions within the Ldn 65 noise contour. This measure is the principal regulatory means of improving land use compatibility with aircraft noise. LU4. Public information program Under this measure, MAC would develop and distribute informational materials concerning aircraft noise and Noise Compatibility Program elements. Materials would be distributed to land developers, planning agencies, housing authorities, local offices of FHA/VA, lending institutions, and realtors. This measure would assist potential new residents in the airport environs to make informed real estate decisions. LU5. Building Code revision. The Metropolitan Council would request modification of the State Building Code to require specified interior noise level reduction for new construciton in areas affected by aircraft noise. The proposed action may be required to implement the Model Aircraft Noise Attenuation Ordinance. Corrective Land Use Measures The following measures addressing existing non -compatible development are listed in descending order of priority. LU6. Soundproofing of schools Recent comments from local residents have indicated an especially high level of public concern regarding the interruption of classroom instruction by aircraft overflight. The following two schools are located in the Ldn 65 contours and should be soundproofed: - Winonah Elementary School, Minneapolis, and - Centennial School, Richfield. Additional schools within the Metropolitan Council Policy Contour experience significant classroom disruption due to aircraft noise. A follow-up school insulation program will be required, following assessment of the need for further insulation on a case-by-case basis. Sound insulation for schools outside of the Ldn 65 contour may not be eligible for federal funding assistance. It is recommended that treatment of these schools be conditional on confirmation by the respective school boards that they will remain as educational facilities. Following such confirmation, these schools would be eligible for a noise insulation program which includes: - mechanical ventilation, - double -glazing of outside windows, and - acoustical wall and ceiling treatment if required. LU7.- Soundproofing of other public buildings Other public buildings recommended for soundproofing are those where a quiet indoor environment is important to their functioning. Libraries, nursing homes, convalescent homes and community centers within the Ldn 65 contours are candidates for noise insulation. The proposed action does not identify specific structures for treatment, but recognizes that such treatment may be appropriate within the overall systems of priorities established for noise correction activities. to a 76 LU8. Soundproofing of homes A combination of soundproofing of homes and purchase guarantee of homes would be the primary actions applied in the Ldn 65-75 zones, with homeowners being offered the option of: - soundproofing, - purchase assurance, or - no action. Individuals who are bothered by aircraft noise, but not to the extent that they feel the need to leave the neighborhood, will be offered additional soundproofing at public expense. The sound- proofing may take the form of general treatment of the whole structure, or treatment of a "quiet room" at the discretion of the homeowner, if the type and condition of the building permits. LU9. Purchase guarantee of homes Purchase assurance will be selected by those who believe that aircraft noise levels to which they are subjected are intolerable, even with additional soundproofing. If they are unable to dispose of their homes after bona fide efforts to sell, public purchase or marketing assistance and minimum sales price assurance will occur. Any acquired property will be soundproofed (if required) and resold as a residence. LU10. As a last resort, acquire property developed in incompatible uses and clear or sell for compatible uses The measure would involve purchase by MAC of a group of properties, probably residential, in the Ldn 65-75 zone, with either: - clearance and maintenance of the area as a buffer; - use for other airport purposes; or - resale, with avigation easements, for commercial, open -space, or other uses compatible with aircraft noise levels and adjacent land uses. . The measure would be applied only at the initiative of the jurisdiction in which it lies, and presumably only in neighborhoods where the jurisdictions have established that there is a reasonable consensus among residents that they prefer to vacate the area. Redevelopment in a specific compatible use will be subject to jurisdictional approval. The Metropolitan Airports Commission will not acquire property on a "spot" basis except where it is to be subsequently resold as a residence as part of a program of maintaining the residential integrity of a neighborhood. 04-1 'Ma The survey of the neighborhoods proposed for priority action in the implementation plans will identify if any of these or other areas are candidates for acquisition. The proposed noise abatement measures along with projected changes in air carrier operations are expected to reduce the number of people living within the Ldn 65 noise zone from an estimated 18,500 to 13,700 by 1992, a reduction of approximately 26 percent. The preventive land use measures are expected to reduce the amount of additional non -compatible land use in the future. It is anticipated that the measures could prevent development of 450 new dwelling units in noise zones where this would be non -compatible. The effectiveness of the measures will depend upon the degree to which these preventive planning measures are implemented by the local jurisdictions. The corrective land use measures could improve compatibility for approximately 5,800 dwelling units. a a "7 7 IMPLEMENTATION The Noise Exposure Maps and the Noise Compatibility Program are to be submitted to the FAA by MAC. The FAA will first determine whether the NEM are in compliance with the Part 150 requirements and will then consider the NCP. When the airport's FAR Part 150 Program is approved by the FAA, the applicable program measures will be eligible for federal funding. -Implementation of the program will require cooperation by several different agencies and levels of government. The noise abatement measures, which involve aircraft operations, generally are the responsibility of the airport operator (MAC), the FAA, and the airlines. Responsibility for the various land use management measures is shared by MAC, the Metropolitan Council, local governments, and state agencies. The table on the following pages summarizes the recommended measures that make up the MSP Noise Compatibility Program. This table includes the essential government agencies and the agencies responsible, and it describes anticipated costs and funding sources. e E m C, z R v r. Q =N N F a; N z ¢ S C N ¢ 1.. -+ T L d .r 3 N - 6 W I••. r1 r > r x =� ti co co d n Ol 01 CZ wr T (O co T co O` z = Y Y ..0. �"" .•r .r I N z ° 71 ^! .ai I nn = ^ > v a 0) < 3 V ° r Vl Lna LnZ W C N C N x O Fc `^ EO ." rr C � 9 G � v W +r r N y Y ++ a a v S vi y O W*o >¢>, Y d G I �cUc Y � M _ t cc u s s m �v N d x mm G^ ... Y C^^ N N Q :rl c 10 y r N N enO V V •� y t r u o EM •v G G J .. d r CEON ¢ y E w > ¢ O Y O [n Z 9 y IC m O to c� C •: m G .•°i r r v r E y .aOi Ol d 41 > y W > c c -J v y _ R 12--2 M u 47 C C CL e•+ EO EO N .. N 1 L .. L Ul A C .y .0+.� E Ei ro b y C N ••°A— Ol O IO Y i 0 Y M E R E m Oc. y .+ r bo C ° _> O y v V r V V G U C- cn S 6 ►: c] A co L O 4-1 m C, z R v r. Q =N N F a; N z ¢ S C N ¢ L d .r 3 N - 6 r > r x =� ti g of U U y .� z = z = = a N z 71 ^! = x > < 3 V N N G N x O Fc `^ C4 rr 7 S vi W*o >¢>, °:W oma' I �cUc yu t cc cal a c �v N d x mm G^ ... Y C^^ N N Q G 10 y r N N •� C •v G G J EC r ¢ bl i •GI L W ¢ Z 9 ••C• Cal C •: m G E pp Z e•+ EO EO N .. N 1 L In ro N c] W CO G _> G I •p ° Ol v of '+ L O 4-1 . I I O. .+ N lu I .v Y � —oa E Oi�: m c i s y h z mc .c •� _I - yw u I r Ed E u u 41 N G a '.Z •- ui Z r+ cc 6 F a W¢ ° i 5 .Nal -I N z zl al z z z Gi m C, z R v r. Q =N N J a; z ¢ S N L d y 3 N - E � > r x =� ti g of O y .� G Z 10 y N r 71 ^! = x > < 3 V x O Fc `^ C4 rr con W W I Z S �• 96 I N U 00 c N 6 I C Y C d 1 1 y Y r0.1 0 O 1 E M .•-1 3 W W y C W Y Y W 1•T •'E1 C E N X VWa Z > ly+ m C L C V y I/I Y O y 10 W L C I •.' O E 6 fW/I d 3 O W W Z H Wry-I 07 U a>. Va i w C Gla u n M u 4 yf� W 111 co O I C y •" U- .0.: y U 1 N .�-1 N Wz O •0.1 con W W I Z S �• 96 I U C c 1 1 6 >� Y 1 1 W L r0.1 0 O 1 E bO C W O 0 u Y Y W O. I N X G O m L) y �+U L d y �0 y I y fW/I y W W cc v Wry-I ayi U 10 Va i O O y¢ O N O I C y •" M y .n 7 U 1 0 U C O O1 j Csa I u W .y C .a W 6 tq L � N b0 u h7 O 6 I •.to •1>•1 7 J D ••>a =C6 uU s C+] I C O v N I I E w u A ~~ Q (V 1 0 bQ•Y 0 y Z GI F a •.yi •O W O C r.- O C u I O O.O L I I C •~ E O 'D G w N C E y 'O O 1 S a— ovr E a u i I .-I O O .--I W bo -0 O OC I 1 6.V GV �M VC7 i V L v ? 10.1 01 0 l9 C r�^I :0 5-03 SU xcn 5„03 5.] W3 cq H I N !•1 ems- ul 6 Z i ^ V U C 2. cn a i 2 V1 1 000 0. W con W W I Z S �• 96 I J Y N i c F >� Y ro W L r0.1 0 O 6 j E 0 W'09 W O 0 u Y Y W O. I •+ G O C7 L) L G i •.+ to C ✓ 30t~ �0 y •.0i w E U 'Oi U w L F V r cc v Wry-I ayi o u W n cI Q O ca i I 1 a o o ¢E I I I C L a0+ 0 •C M y .n 7 •.� I yUy yto f0 01 w° j N L Oyl O m 7 6 tq L Y Y O b0 u h7 O Y 0 O 6 ON i r•I J D n =C6 uU s C+] I C O v N I 3 L _ ~~ Q _d¢y I bQ•Y y C I E- U F a I � Q Z ti Z J > H a >� Y •> C W L r0.1 0 O n C d W O 0 u O. 00 Y C 6. W bO W = Y 'O rl u co y C > U C •.+ to C ✓ 30t~ aq' •.0i w E U 'Oi U w 10a C' G W V r 0 Wry-I C w= y y , 'y V 6 W Y C W W L4 v C C a a0+ 0 •C M y .n 7 •.� O •7 yUy yto f0 01 '•' ' E S N vi E M O 1Fj J a ca 0 O C, O O O n n r, co V m 00 co 00 co 0% N O, N N p�•1 '�•1 y y y V r L 10.1 , y V y y y6 y -C C C C �+• L Y Y 9 a > > O m 6 C C O d .-I .••1 r•I u n u s uU s s G O �a c n 3 L _ ~~ Q _d¢y _66 o ri V E E V y .•-1 �. y L L y y y y G Z J a O O O O O U u u u V C 7 a M '•"1 W O L: 0 L V r L 10.1 , y V y y y •C y -C M C C •C E E Eo 9 a 6 C C 6 d n Y c s a c n 3 L Q W V o 6 I V E E V y .•-1 O W> y L L y y y y u O D „y > M > •n > 0 L •n G y > .-I O O .--I W bo -0 O OC 0. C.9 6.V GV �M VC7 V L v ? 10.1 01 0 l9 C r�^I :0 5-03 SU xcn 5„03 5.] W3 y N !•1 ems- ul C ^ V 41C 000 0. W .00. y L Y W C0 a ro• > ' u 0.0 W+ y — .y y 14.0.1 Y O ..� ci V Itl ^7 u u-3 C V 'S7 ..+ y u ^' b0— O W E r� S N e uC y U CO r••1 N y u u O y y y v O u O D. y N y V1 0 C y9 W ^ .u. C•n y�•O :n 0 y .:y . y G •n .,y Y .0 C. •n u W = U ra 7 = _.CL 10 .W+ ._Oi O. ~ C 7 7 b0 cr Y 00 V) L 00 y 9 W '0 -U dY C •Y C Y G v 0 W 6 L = E G L O c J 0 O 7 U 4 :J W u .0. :J •n i U ':••1 0u A 10 S V O i i S VI Na r J 7 E C 7 a ,W,1 10 W O L: 0 E > bc n Y Z Z S VI c=4 W r W W W .. to 6 I N 1�0 w ^ cr bo �I > N !•1 ems- .0 i y J O � U O v v�j u W cr,m 8� NN u E g u I CD T W m C00IO OD m m m O, m C5, N T N N .�.1 c� xco ✓: I I. N N N ,O E O U a V) .y. C Y �.... ..Ci u0i ..w G . eeO 'y Y, O r••1 C Itl t un > O! V) m d O T O aa � C t;Q VG G au S C 06OO y ay S 10 N y✓ m OD' co s T u CD m m da W ¢y 0 Y W 4. b0.O O' [s. 7 W 4. 00 3 N b dO E 0 T C O N C O p O y °' ° 0.0 C6 a w a i apM no u .p u 6 O G DO ✓ C N 00 •J 5O L O N c � a �� O. a �+ a y G 7 •N C �•' '+ s •� 3 0 •n Y S J 3 .0 ,�0i S 'C b •r"I .�+ $ t 3 G 6 Z 7 U Q (O N d d s a S O. W > W •j > > 01 b t0 u W u u U N N N N G OJ N •.•I c W VI u C T N = N L � W T Cm J w Y d L Ln O E .N.1 .•1 T '� T ,,,� mow En y Ci .+ CO O E 0 spi tN'1 r 0 O O Y 0 Z a VS N Z a V) VT u N VT U O U N 0 u u u W u N ,V, E u E g u E Q E c L u v 1 V N c 'o q >0 a o is xu c� xco ✓: I I. N N N '.tea Si E O U a V) .y. z °• V �.... ..Ci u0i ..w G . eeO 'y Y, O r••1 C Itl t un > O! u In yN V) m O O T O O> � C t;Q VG G au S C 06OO y ay S 10 N y✓ la7 t E L W C H E N '•' p 10 Y u Qq E Vl da W ¢y 0 Y W 4. b0.O O' [s. 7 W 4. 00 3 N b dO E 0 T C O N L01 N O¢ U O•�N N O Y Y N Y d W O y C 0..0.. •� G C r+ 6 C G> O •.r C G 00 10 ul0 ..Ci y no u .p u 6 O G DO ✓ C N 00 •J 5O L O N � •.u•I -0 u 0— > 0 Oy 4 0 O 7 •N C 0. 0 W •n Y S J 3 .0 ,�0i S 'C b •r"I .�+ $ t 3 G $ Y Z 7 U I U 1 r-1 p 1 a. v 1 c - ✓: I I. O '.tea Si p O N V) .y. z °• V �.... 'a u y = o u V! - O ~ N 1 V V) m Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS C. Public Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Contract 87-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer and Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) --On May 15, formal bids were received regarding installa- tion of the above referenced utilities under this contract. Enclosed on page 2,L3 is a summary tabulation of the bids received with the comparison of the low bid to the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearings held on November 18 and December 16 of 1986. The increased costs associated with the Northview Park trunk storm sewer (Project 479) relates to the requirement to increase the size of the storm sewer outlet from Northview Park down to Patrick Eagan Park to minimize the impact of temporary flooding on the proposed park improvements by providing a greater outlet capacity. This design modification was a result of extensive review with the Park Department and its Commission. All costs associated with this design change would be the responsibility of the storm sewer trunk fund. All bids will be reviewed for their accuracy in extension and addition and a formal recommendation will be provided by the Director of Public Works at the meeting on May 19. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 87-5 (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer and Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. =a- CITY CONTRACT NO. 87-5 LEXINGTON HILLS FIRST ADDITION SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION CITY PROJECT NO. 478 LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK (POND JP -29, -JP -34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER CITY PROJECT NO. 479 EAGAN MINNESOTA BID TIME: 10:30 A.M. C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Thursday, May 14, 1987 CONTRACTORS ' TOTAL BASE BID 1. Norex $449,420.75 2. Nodland Associates 463,090.00 3. Burschville 469,471.20 4. Northdale Construction 473,229.50 5. L & G Rehbein 479,960.20 6. Richard Knutson 487,640.92 7. F.F. Jedlicki 492,493.50 8. Orfei 534,607.39 Feasibility Report ............................$382,130.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE .......................... 450,000.00 % Under Engineer's Estimate .................. -0.1% % Over Feasibility Report .................... +17.6% X 83 Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four Item 2. Contract 87-10, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Nancy Circle - Streets) --On April 24, formal bids were received for the proposed improvements of Nancy Circle cul-de-sac with related storm sewer facilities. Consideration of award of this contract was continued to the May 19 meeting to allow the public hearing for Project 482 to be completed. If the project is approved under the public hearing portion of the May 19 agenda, it would be appropriate to award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids received, showing the relationship of the low bidder to the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the December 2, 1986 public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 87-10 (Nancy Circle - Streets and Storm Sewer) and if Project 482 is approved award the contract to Bituminous Roadways in the amount of $22,008 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. a84 CITY CONTRACT NO. 87-10 NANCY CIRCLE UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 482 EAGAN MINNESOTA 1. Bituminous Roadways 2. Valley Paving 3. S.M. Hentges 4. Alexander Construction ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FEASIBILITY REPORT % UNDER ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE % UNDER FEASIBILITY REPORT ass Bid Time: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. Bid Date: Thursday, April 16, 1987 $22,008.00 22,665.75 23,553.30 26,029.00 u 25,000.00 25,210.00 -12% -12.7% Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Five Item 3. Contract 87-12, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington Square 6th Addition/Northview Park Road - Streets and Utilities) -- Consideration of contract award was continued from the May 2nd meeting to allow completion of the state aid approval process. Recent contact with that office indicates that due. to their workload, they will not be able to complete their review and subsequent approval process until after the May 19 meeting. In order to protect the state aid financing required for this project, formal consideration of contract award must be delayed until formal approval is received from MnDOT State Aid. Therefore, this item should be continued for formal consideration to the June 2 meeting. Conditions in the specifications require the low bidder to guarantee his bids through the June 2nd City Council meeting. Enclosed on page ,;2R7is a tabulation of the bids received. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue consideration to June 2, 1987, for contract award regarding Contract 87-12 (Lexington Square 6th Addition/Northview Park Road - Streets and Utilities). Our File No. 49405 LEXINGTON SQUARE 6th ADDITION NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS M.S.A.P. No. 195-118-01 CITY CONTRACT NO. 87-12 CITY PROJECT NO. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID TIME: 10:30 A.M. C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Fri. Mayl, 1987 CONTRACTORS 1. Richard Knutson 2. Burschville Construction 3. G.L. Contracting 4. Northdale Construction 5. Orfei & Sons 6. Lake Area Utility 7. Widmer Bros. 8. S.J. Louis Construction ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ------------ 3470e FEASIBILITY REPORT EST. % UNDER FEASIBILITY REPORT ESTIMATE % UNDER ENGINEER'S REPORT ESTIMATE 0-4'7 TOTAL BASE BID $431,381.20 434,244:95 447,196.72 448,004.70 459,851.22 465,80 9.30 439454.60 506.425.10 $455,000.00 $509,445.00 -17.1% - 5.2% i Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Six Item 4. Contract 87-11, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Greensboro 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, May 15, formal bids were received regarding the installation of streets and utilities for the second phase development of the Greensboro Addition which received final plat approval earlier on the agenda. However, the City has not yet received the appropriate permits required from all regulatory or permitting agencies as necessary to allow formal consideration of contract award. Therefore, it is recommended that formal consideration be continued to June 2. Enclosed on page c2n is a tabulation of the bids received. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Continue consideration of contract award to June 2, 1987, for Contract 87-11 (Greensboro 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities). GREENSBORO 2ND ADDITION ' UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY -PROJECT NO. 493, CONTRACT 87-11 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1. GL Contracting 2. NodIand Xssociates 3. Orfei & Sons 4. Burschville Construction 5. Annandale Cont. ._r 6. Ceca Utilities 7. Lake Area Utility 8. Northdale Construction x ENGINEER'S EST.IMATE----------- Feasibility Report % Bid Under Feasibility Report % Bid Under Engineer's Estimate .BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Wednesday, May 13, 1987 A • $288,883.49 302,132.50 335,568.67 352,366.95 356,151.75 368,946.00 370,511.45 388,226.00 $346,000.00 346,875.00 -16.7% -16.5% Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Seven PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (continued) Item 5. Contract 87-8, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (1987 Sealcoating)--In accordance with the approved budget for 1987, the Engineering Division has prepared a sealcoating program necessary for the long-term preservation of our capital investment in City streets. The Public Works Director will be reviewing the location fo the streets to sealcoated along with the Engineering estimate as compared to the approved budget at the meeting on May. 19. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 87-8 (1987 Sealcoating) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on June 12, 1987. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (continued) Item 6. Contract 85-26, Permit for Extended Working Hours, Wells #8 and #9 --Enclosed on page�a- is a letter from the contractor requesting authorization from the City to allow well drilling construction operations to occur beyond the restrictive hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. as defined by current City ordinance. This request for additional working hours will allow the contractor to employ two full shifts in trying to speed up the completion of these wells so that they can be put into operations. These wells have encountered significant delays due to unforeseen circumstances during the well drilling operations. With the continued expansive growth of the City, the need for these wells are quickly becoming critical, especially in light of the recent weather conditions. However, staff has received complaints from a resident in the Surrey Heights Addition regarding the noise associated with this construction and the duration of this contract. The consulting engineer will be able to provide additional information in regard to this request on the meeting on May 19. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approved/deny a permit for extended working hours for Contract 85-26 (Wells #8 and #9). aq� Be, May 13, 1987 ,.City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road 'P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Attn: Mr. Tom Colbert P.E. Dear Sir: RECEIVED i lie i 7 5115 Industrial Street Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 (612) 479-3121 Bergerson-Caswell has worked diligently in an attempt to complete the Mt. Simon Well for the City of Eagan. We have cooperated with the City Engineer and Consulting Engineer to overcome many unusual problems. These problems have caused delays beyond our control. Bergerson-Caswell is aware that the City would like to have this project completed as soon as possible to fulfill their water demand. Therefor Bergerson-Caswell respectfully requests that we be allowed to drill the Mt. Simon Well using two(2) crews working 3 days per week at 13 hours per day. Our working hours would be from 7:00 AM until 8:00 PM Monday thru Saturday. We feel that this will facilitate completion of the well in the most expedient manner. We thank you very much for your attention to this manner. Sincerely, Bergerson-Caswell Inc. G� 2 " John W. Henrich Vice President cc: Mr. Robert Rosene P.E. Mr. Richard Foster P.E. WELL DRILLING AND REPAIRING Q� MP INSTALLATION AND SERVICE MUNICIPAL - INDUSTRIADOM ESTIC - ANY SIZE - ANY DEPTH Agenda Information Memo, May 19, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Eight PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS D. Private Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Contract 85-S, Final Acceptance (Brittany 8th Addition - Streets and Utilities) --We have received a request from the developer of the Brittany 8th Addition for final acceptance of the street and utilities installed privately. This request was accompanied by a certification from a consulting engineering firm that the installation of these public facilities were installed in accordance with the City approved plans and specifications. All final verification inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve the installation of streets and utilities installed under Contract 85-S (Brittany 8th Addition) and accept those improvements for perpetual City maintenance. Item 2. Contract 85-C, Final Acceptance (Eagan Center 1st Addition - Streets and Utilities) --We have received a request from the developer for final acceptance of the streets and utilities instal- led privately within the Eagan Center lst Addition. This request was accompanied by a certification from a consulting engineering firm indicating that these improvements were installed in accordance with City approved plans and specifications. Final verification inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and is now being recommended for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the streets and utilities installed under Contract 86-C (Eagan Center 1st Addition) and accept for perpetual maintenance. aq3