Loading...
04/21/1987 - City Council RegularAGENbA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL APRIL 21, 1987 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Fire Department r- 1 1. Establish Question for Fire Station #4 & #5 Bond Referendum 3 2. Consider Bids for a New Fire Tanker Truck IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA �.4 A. Personnel Items P,4, B. Q -Petroleum for Cigarette and Service Station Licenses, 4206 Nicols Road P.7 C. Project 498, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Stafford Place) 8 D. Approve Resolution to Restrict Parking on Pilot Knob Road V.(l E. Project 502, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report and Detail P Plans (R & B Addition) f.(2F. Approve Final Plat, Lexington Square 5th Addition 2.14 G. Approve Final Plat, Lexington Square 7th Addition J&H. Approve Final Plat, Lemay Lake Hills Townhomes C110I. Approve Final Plat, Royal Oak Circle 3rd Addition P`�DT. Approve Final Plat, Town Centre 100 3rd Addition P,;LZK. Appointment of Election Judges V. 7:00 - PUBLIC BEARINGS p, :23 A. Public Hearing for Project 491, Eagan Hills Farm - Trunk Utilities and Streets P,(o5 B. Public Hearing for Project 494, East Wescott Road - Streets and Utilities x(09 C. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 432, Royal Oak Circle to be Continued to the May 5, 1987 City Council Meeting. D. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 462, Windtree 5th & 6th P' Additions to be Continued to the May 5, 1987 City Council Meeting p(i3 E. Public Hearing to Consider Vacation of a Portion of Crestridge Lane F. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 459, Brittany 9th Addition to P be Continued to the May 5, 1987 City Council Meeting VI. OLD BUSINESS f.09 A. Landscape Plan Review, NSP Sub -Station, Lot 10, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3 �.(lg B. Conditional Use Permit (Blackhawk Plaza, Inc.) to Allow Gas Pumps and Service Bays on Separate Lots at the Blackhawk Plaza at the NE Intersection of Blackhawk and Diffley Roads in the SE1/4 See 32 C. Consider City Code Amendment to Disallow Off -Site Temporary Advertising Signs VII. NEW BUSINESS i2S A. Special Permit (Dominium Group) for Four, 4' X 81, Two -Directional Consideration of Organized Collection Study RFP Signs to be Located Near the Intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Public Contracts: Cliff Road; the Intersection of Thomas Lake and Cliff Road; Lot 2, 1. Block 1, Knob Hill Professional Park; and the Intersection of Diffley Road and Thomas Lake Road C) B. Waiver of Plat (B.H. Grace Corporation) for Duplex Lot Split for 2. Lot 6, Block 1, and Lot 3, Block 2, Rahn Ridge Addition 3c� C. Variance (7-8-9 Company) for a 20' Setback at Lots 7 & 8, Eagandale ` Center Industrial Park #3 >9 D. Variance (Diane & Gerry Groth) for a 10' Rear Setback, for Lot 5, Block 1, Harvey Addition Use Permit (Daniel Sjolseth) to Allow Outside Storage )� E. Conditional for an Auto body Shop on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition 4. Located Along Cedarvale Boulevard at the Cedar Avenue/Highway f Interchange in N1/2 of Section 19 Utilities) Rezoning (Eagan Woodhaven Addition - Eagan Woodhaven Partnership) P of 4.58 A (Agricultural) acres to R-4 and a Preliminary Plat for 64 j units located along Lexington Avenue south of Yankee Doodle Road in VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) the NE1 /4 of Section 14. -7g G. Preliminary Plat (Hidden Valley Addition - Graham Development I P' Company) Consisting of 25 lots on 14.5 acres located along the east side of Pilot Knob Road just north of Deerwood Drive in the NW 1/4 Q of Section 22. H. Preliminary Plat and a Conditional Use Permit (Silver Bell 2nd - �� Dallas Development Company) for an automotive service center, restaurant and a 103,000 SF office showroom located on 13.68 acres on the west side of Hwy. 13 and north of Silver Bell Road in the SE1 /4 of Section 18. VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS Z�7 A. Consideration of Organized Collection Study RFP B. Public Contracts: Z3 1 1. Contract 87-6, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Pilot Knob Trunk Storm Sewer) 2,33 2. Contract 87-7, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lone Oak 2nd T. Addition - Streets and Utilities) 7Z!5 P 3. Contract 86-3, Final Acceptance (Ashbury Road - Streets and Utilities) �p.23,!5 4. Contract 85-10, Final Acceptance (Birch Park - Streets and f Utilities) 2 3 5. Contract 86-11, Final Payment/Acceptance (Wyndham Corp. Center) I%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) R. ADJOURNMENT 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 15, 1987 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval is given to the April 21, 1987 agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the April 7, 1987 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: A. FIRE DEPARTMENT Item 1. Establish Question for Fire Station #4 and #5 Bond Referendum --The Fire Department has reviewed the list of proposed expenditures for the May 28, 1987 bond referendum and it is the recommendation of Fire Chief Southorn that the amount of $1,880,000 not be changed. The only cost to be reduced is Small Equipment which totals less than $10,000. The one item the City Council may want to consider removing from the proposed bond referendum is the refurbishment of pumper number 6. This would remove $30,000 from the referendum, reducing the amount from $1,880,000 to $1,850,000. Fire Chief Southorn will be present to review the numbers and discuss the bond issue amount with the City Council on Tuesday. Enclosed on page V is a copy of a spread sheet that was reviewed at the April 7, 1987 City Council meeting. The City Clerk and City Attorney have prepared a question for the May 28 ballot which reads as follows: "shall the City Council of the City of Eagan be authorized to issue its general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $1,880,000 for the purpose of purchasing and improving land, constructing and furnishing two (2) fire stations and purchasing pumpers and related equipment?" ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To approve or deny an amount for the May 28 bond referendum and 2) authorize the wording of a question to be placed on a ballot for the May 28, 1987 special bond referendum. 1987 FIRE STATION, LAND AND EQUIPMENT BONDS APRIL 6, 1987 REVISION Issue Size #1 Land (Station 4) $ 50,000 Land (Station 5) 75,000 Building, Furnishings, & Equipment 430,000 Pumpers (3) & Related Equipment 540,000 Unit 6 Refurbishment 30,000 Architect/Engineering Fees 21,000 Referendum Costs 4,000 Issue #1 Subtotal $1,150,000 Issuance Costs 70,000 Bond Sale Total $1,220,000 Issue Size #2 Issue #1 Subtotal $1,150,000 Building, Furnishings, & Equipment 430,000 Pumper (1) & Related Equipment 180,000 Personnel Carrier 20,000 Architect/Engineering Fees 20,000 Issue #2 Subtotal $1,800,000 Issuance Costs 80,000 Bond Sale Total $1,880,000 Issuance costs have been estimated only. These costs will fluctuate depending on the size of the issue and the amount of capitalized interest included in the issue. Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Two CONSIDER BIDS FOR NEW TANKER TRUCK Item 2. Fire Department Tanker Bids --The City received three (3) bids on March 26, 1987 to furnish a 1,850 gallon tanker trunk with quick fill and dump valves, emergency lights and siren and a portable 2,000 gallon tank. There were three (3) bidders: Laverne Fire Apparatus Company, $74,664; Custom Fire Apparatus Inc., $65,700 and Clarey's Safety Equipment in the amount of $58,925. The apparent low bidder is Clarey's Safety Equipment. Our Fire Administration has reviewed the bids and discovered that Clarey's bid is inconsistent with the specifications such as a smaller alternator, three instead of four batteries, no battery charger, no battery selector and the most significant difference is the different size of steel on the bottom of the booster tank. The Clarey's is 1/4" steel plate while Custom and Laverne meet the minimum specifications which is a 5/16" steel plate or 12 gauge. It is the* recommendation of the Truck Committee and Fire Chief Southorn that the bid be awarded to Custom Fire Apparatus Inc., on the basis of competitive bidding and compliance with specifications. The Truck Committee has viewed an example of the Custom Fire Apparatus Inc. product at the Lakeville Fire Department and is satisfied with that unit. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the fire tanker bids in the amount of $65,700 to Custom Fire Apparatus Inc., the second low bidder for the reasons as stated. 3 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Three CONSENT AGENDA There are fifteen (15) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of these items in further detail, the items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. Personnel Items: Item 1. Seasonal Ballfield Attendants --There were eleven applications for these two seasonal positions. After screening of the applications, five candidates were interviewed by Recreational Supervisor II Peterson. It is her recommendation and the recommendation of Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa that Brent Eichten and Paul Frank be hired as ballfield attendants for the 1987 season. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Brent Eichten and Paul Frank as seasonal ballfield attendants. Item 2. Seasonal Weed Inspector/Compost Site Monitor --The two previous seasonal part time positions of seasonal weed inspector and seasonal compost site monitor have been combined into one seasonal 40 hour work week position. Applicants for this position were interviewed by Superindent of Parks VonDeLinde and Administrative Assistant Holhenstein. It is their recommendation that James E. Jensen be hired as the seasonal weed inspector/compost site monitor. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of James E. Jensen as the seasonal weed inspector/compost site monitor. Item 3. Seasonal Park Attendant/Trapp Farm Park --After interviews, it is the recommendation of Park Superintendent VonDeLinde that Steve Cochran be hired as a seasonal park attendant at Trapp Farm Park. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Steve Cochran as a seasonal park attendant at Trapp Farm Park. Item 4. Seasonal Park Maintenance Workers --After interviews, the following persons are recommended for hire by Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde as seasonal park maintenance workers: Jeffrey Baker, Dana Hein and Hugh Peterson. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Jeffrey Baker, Dana Hein and Hugh Peterson as seasonal park maintenance workers. ./ Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Four Item 5. Seasonal Utility Maintenance Workers --After interviews, the following persons are recommended for hire by Superintendent of Utilities and Buildings Connolly as seasonal utility maintenance workers: Mark Dornseif, Grant Lundberg, Blaine Robertson and Richard Robohm. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Mark Dornseif, Grant Lundberg, Blaine Robertson and Richard Robohm as seasonal utility maintenance workers. Item 6. Seasonal Street Maintenance Workers --After interviews, the following persons are recommended for hire by Superintendent of Streets and Equipment Erhart as seasonal street maintenance workers: Gary Davis, Brian McMorrow, Kelly Ramswick, Mike Shomion and Jerry Thorman. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Gary Davis, Brian McMorrow, Kelly Ramswick, Mike Shomion and Jerry Thorman as seasonal street maintenance workers. Item 7. Zoning Administrator --The position of zoning administrator is a new position in the Planning Department as approved in the 1987 budget. Approximately forty applications were received for this position. After screening of the applications, ten applicants were invited to the Eagan Municipal Center for an interview with City Planner Runkle and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Shannon Willey be hired for the position of zoning administrator, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Shannon Willey as zoning administrator, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. Item 8. Police Officer --With the resignation of a police officer which was approved at the April 7, 1987 City Council meeting, a vacancy for that position exists. It is the recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe that Thomas Nelson, who is currently a C.S.O. with the City, be appointed to fill the vacant position. Mr. Nelson currently meets all requirements for the position, such as P.O.S.T License and successful completion of the City's physical and psychological examinations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Thomas Nelson as a police officer for the City of Eagan. id Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Five Item 9. Community Service Officer --If the Council approves the hiring of Thomas Nelson as a police officer, a vacancy will be created for a C.S.O. with the City. It will be necessary to authorize advertisement for a new C.S.O. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: If the hiring of Thomas Nelson as a police officer was approved, to approve the advertisement for a C.S.O. for the City. - Item 10. Records Technician --Approximately twenty-eight applications were received for this Police Department position. After screening of the applications, seven applicants were invited to the Eagan Municipal Center for testing and an interview with Administrative Captain Geagan, Office Manager Knight and Administrative Assistant Duffy. Five of the seven accepted the invitation. It is the recommendation of Captain Geagan, Manager Knight and Assistant Duffy that Lynn Vasquez be hired to fill the vacancy, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Lynn Vasquez as the records technician in the Police Department, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. Q-PETROLEUM/CIGARETTE & SERVICE STATION LICENSES B. Q -Petroleum for Cigarette and Service Station Licenses --Rahn Cliff 1st Addition was given preliminary plat approval on October 2, 1984 and final plat approval on July 15, 1986. The approved plan calls for a hotel/motel, office building, and a gas facility. Q -Petroleum is interested in occupying the gas facility and is now applying for a service station permit and a cigarette license. They anticipate a June opening. The service station will be a company store owned by Q -Petroleum and the license application is in the name of James P. Hill, Vice -President of Marketing for Q -Petroleum. Normally, these license applications are not distributed; however, if any member of the City Council would like to see the service station or cigarette license, please contact this office and copies will be made available. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Q -Petroleum for cigarette and service station licenses at 4206 Nicols Road as presented. Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Six PROJECT 498, RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING C. Project 498, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Stafford Place) --In response to a petition submitted by the developer of the Stafford Place Addition and School District #196, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of Braddock Trail and Northview Park Road extension as it abutts these two developments along with all related utilities. This feasibility report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration of scheduling a public hearing to be held on May 19, 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 498 (Stafford Place - Streets and Utilities) and schedule the public hearing to be held May 19, 1987. Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Seven APPROVE RESOLUTION RESTRICTING PARKING PILOT KNOB ROAD D. Approve Resolution to Restrict Parking on Pilot Knob Road --With the County upgrading of Pilot Knob Road (C.R. 31) with County State - Aid funds, the State is requiring that the local governmental unit (City) formally pass a resolution restricting all on -street parking due to the fact that the design width in the final plans does not provide for any on -street parking lanes. Enclosed on page —9- is a copy of the resolution required by the State to process and approve these County plans, restricting on -street parking. Also enclosed on page 16 is a resolution for acceptance of plans for upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a resolution restricting on -street parking for Pilot Knob Road and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. N RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the County of Dakota has submitted to the Commissioner of Transportation the plans and specifications for the improvement of CSAH #31 (Pilot Knob Road) and related intersection improvements from Rebecca Lane to I -35E in the City of Eagan, and WHEREAS, state -aid funds will be expended on the improvement of this street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, approval of the proposed construction as a County State Aid Highway project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a County State Aid project within the City of Eagan has been determined. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City of Eagan shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on the east and west sides of CSAH #31 (Pilot Knob Road) and the north and south sides of CSAH #32 (Cliff Road) and County Road #30 (Diffley Road) within the project limits at all times. Dated April 21, 1987 Attest State of Minnesota ) County of Dakota ) ss City of Eagan ). Mayor Clerk I do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Eagan, Minnesota at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 21st day of April, 1987 as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. (SEAL) City Clerk Submit 2 Copies 7 CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PLANS FOR UPGRADING OF COUNTY STATE -AID HIGHWAY NO. 31 (PILOT KNOB ROAD) WHEREAS, plans for County Contract 31-21 and City Project No. 466 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross-sections for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of County State -Aid Highway No. 31 within the limits of the City as a County State -Aid Highway Project have.been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plan be in all things approved. Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: March 17, 1987 CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Attest: CERTIFICATION Its Mayor Its Clerk I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk fo the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 17th day of March, 1987. E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan /a Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eight PROJECT 502, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT E. Project 502, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report and Detail Plans (R & B Addition) --The City has received a petition from the developers from the proposed R & B Addition just south of Duckwood Drive from the Town Centre 70 Addition, requesting the installation of a storm sewer line along the back lot line servicing this and future commercial developments in the area south of Duckwood Drive curve. They have also requested the simultaneous preparation of detail plans and specifications and have guaranteed all costs associated with this work should the project not be approved or their development not proceed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the prepartion of a feasibility report and detail plans for Project 502 (R & B Addition - Storm Sewer). /I Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Nine APPROVE FINAL PLAT, LEXINGTON SQUARE 5TH ADDITION F. Approve Final Plat, Lexington Square 5th Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Lexington Square 5th Addition. A copy of the proposed final plat is contained on page �3 _. All conditions placed on the approval of the preliminary plat granted by Council action on March 22, 1984 have been resolved and all final plat application material has been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Lexington Square 5th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /v X LU it r _t �mli [. nii tt rij;:' s:a'�c i ,;G -- •r .j :r -a �[ °t � I ° � � � s s2Rr 'Z �ff: I at 13 i�: re ij �s=i-, 3fl46 I i S` 1ifi �fl� b� s � 3fl ist All _ ij flajIia ys iia=rF , .F f6 tj t z 1. F tj I I = ►a c lie ��i 3 �Ffaai: E Hi B~ I' qy C = r.uyi� 'r -C:\ 7.--WA-'•1.++ rW* y •I.6 Y.IN v nrro ,,ti If.E `-� ,41 1 r � i _IIF- AJI.[cC T B~ I' qy C = r.uyi� 'r -C:\ 7.--WA-'•1.++ rW* y •I.6 Y.IN v nrro ,,ti If.E `-� ,41 1 L; . • fiP �; 0 4 d O Ca �4 \2 Cv k L [� / W V: cx 006i ll� ry O Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Ten APPROVE FINAL PLAT, LEXINGTON SQUARE 7TH ADDITION G. Approve Final Plat, Lexington Square 7th Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Lexington Square 7th A ition. A copy of the proposed final plat is contained on page All conditions placed on the approval of the preliminary plat granted by Council action on March 22, 1984 have been resolved and all final plat application material has been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Lexington Square 7th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 14 I �C j CY 1(� W W !i9 i r- ► e a �. c a I $ah jal Edj I a � ;l i � a � � 9 y • d�i1 I �. IQ iia: •>I � �' � a :� e y .Fi a H i 'ie @ii ip•ajF° re !� � 1lHd �� �. C r c� �� 9��, �ii�6► 1 !P I HHd � Q � a � �I c ��9• Y5' , dd j � ` 1 � � e �d i if �a3 B�P� �ji ' � i e e e ���� n� � � � I � � 6•I Iz ��yS yb J11JOn� fJa.rf/Afy JJII ✓b Ibf fJOJ JJff 1Y..9 OJjv')wl 6 Mt7wrS) I .r � J..` n...lw�rw...w. .. �•r M.J ��n-r• S 7 N 1�11n0 �a Jml lro7 l oz • N ` f 4 tea• y < \ E •e. �6 .� � y� Y � E rjppL J� p+;8- �1 - o � l 4 11.1 P9�1' tpq� i ze9: oz • N ` �1 I a I 4 11.1 P9�1' tpq� i ze9: Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eleven APPROVE_FINAL PLAT, LEMAY LAKE HILLS REPLAT H. Approve Final Plat, Lemay Lake Hills Replat--The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Lemay Lake Hills Replat. A copy of the proposed final plat is contained on page- All conditions placed on the approval of the prelimi ry plat granted by Council action on April 7, 1987 have been resolved and all final plat application material has been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Lemay Lake Hills Replat and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /4 ma„ • 1101• • I �:_r � •� i � w.a.. _ y..rw =-• d: "� I � is .1�F,_-1•"r°.9:'� •'a. E�Jfyo i - s' 7(,.-wrw ��?W..r 7:: 1 7_�•L' —�*--_ � �. -•`a-,aiJ�ej�. •1` 1-- ix ;=a s 107 J3s101 . :• 7 \ _ !3'33 �Q u 1 1 =i -tFlto.a:9'1 "la 1 ww.wa L .0 a Lai &I Lai •� 1M'a-aw• =t{ ,•_ • Ta» •[.:y-7,i2.••.t9n-°9191— -+- L:J 1 ' 91 107 •�( na•.a.9 �• _ 7�7 a2. 101 i v /r i a �_�R�s• — 2.1- if oy:�___ Jc_-_ 1' - ' '�_ 91 101Lij s � a n%rKa.y '^•. � t•u:t 7 ..T{ � t y,•, `.,'.� �! C . 11 101 ,.�m F ••�!{n �.� \I` a9' ... ,•a.gFY-nu ` m _ 1 .Y ^ �4"i►.� �y. Ai i/ .;�. � ',\ •1. I .tL• rJt-F n / _. 9 Cy lr f O 7 SI 101 i a.Ra+1Dl a it T: 9. O 6 �•i:.JA F7 -'.'• ?. �.. 1 ' IL J'l ZIA Gil Lo UJ ir Lai o at u, ,- Jw a• n _ _ -;, :.:rain -e a i. ! S -*• -- -,;36S.. ' D _ i i•'u 1'9na'M. u'u• +•ua/ ! �:•�� - _�'_•..�_aa,re • 6G' 101 •� � La: -w .,i aytll i�2 a � ��-'�Q J 1' -.: Q ; •__ L+ s,P ria•u F�J j P. r — 1Ca c -a 9G 107 •S I l uj J.: ,r �4 npq••.aw - \ ; , w I - to a.ca.n.Jw'�• i� i `� J `, >a• ` o\V \` �L-Fwtrii . . 09 ILU— + , a s carr rimm.Jr.� � .at Gi :'a � _ •_ _ net, 101 i y tm.m Ji+ i �irw -/ i •1 i. t r` s (09 loll ic�m..a 7 ri t n•a �� - :: �, (n.Faa Oi 10l a.unran°18• •i, _ �•� ^ J 9Y 101 ; a I,.moo.u.F-a-cta,.a.a+n « -a •q i� • 9't I If, A.a•a Yr(9 : a(9 � � 9 � H_ W Ic • 1 ���, •: rel �i 7n••..-r - _ 1 i2 .11 10ILct:t.•fll���. •i ��naiaw i fit. - Lf 10l ``(u' yI'g'7-F r aeaaw aF9•w9 " 1 —� t nttr•t o �I , ci '',':�""':T� �- , an ... '6. i •� i3 (as a2 lm?ggq' X 1 I aY` i cn i s a , mpauD y wn ••t Y `" a :v +( lm i' �// �� ,pq•9r,a ..,awr..-.. a• r 7,at n.J• _ LLS 1011 •yay, a�q ,.iiasww. aaua..n .•' 4 r,P ]ot nun • : S► 107 • ',y: • I a mm.aaw a,a(at.•w ` • �! .rn ,aa 1 l FQ- _._ a a•10. _-a101.4G (96 lt)ll :lAioa..MYG a,•a.•w i �,+ .� .a •' \. ie4LM . 92 101 1•gaV ay "^I: w •• Wl �amaw.-i ttauw-Mn 7! e (99 1011 capam.as �� l 92 101 �•�•'- ' '•'a 9 ti 101:3 li 101 � 1 L .n.l•y ji'. I7.G to•0 ��'r� 1 ,ii "".^" "' �" - .c_ ro� r •t;.moa.a+ 'tatr.+yti� jginau°1iai sAl tu°.�i �� i .•• _:- 4 Q Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twelve APPROVE FINAL PLAT, ROYAL OAK CIRCLE 3RD ADDITION I. Approve Final Plat, Royal Oak Circle 3rd Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Royal Oak Circle 3rd Addition. A copy of the proposed final plat is contained on page' . All conditions placed on the approval of the preliminary plat All by Council action on December 18, 1984 have been resolved and all final plat application material has been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Royal Oak Circle 3rd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. x W m Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen APPROVE FINAL PLAT, TOWN CENTRE 100 3RD ADDITION J. Approve Final Plat, Town Centre 100 3rd Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Town Centre 100 3rd Addition. A copy of the proposed final plat is contained on page —Y _. All conditions placed on the approval of the preliminary plat granted by Council action on September 16, 1986 have been resolved and all final plat application material has been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Town Centre 100 3rd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. mi w :O I : • i v ua_i B y3 .gy ■7f i LiJ :73 :L ?� O Q A a O I Y I 81i ` F I` jcr _ •' I 2 z- a W�. c n 7 r'• � w 1 � ' I � ra-w low I °'f w Y /••meq � MypOZwOM� J ' � _ "�' I ` _ - s:+a� / is • • - '--� .' I T � - C• I � .w•if [,LOON I�r !Y Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES K. Appointment of Election Judges --It is necessary that the City Council appoint election judges for the special bond referendum that is scheduled on May 28, 1987. The City Clerk's office is contacting a number of persons for the one -day election appointment; however, the list of recommended appointees will not be available until Monday with the administrative agenda distribution. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of election judges as distributed with the administrative agenda on Monday. 1:2 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen PROJECT 491/EAGAN HILLS FARM-- TRUNK UTILITIES & STREETS A. Project 491, Eagan Hills Farm (Trunk Utilities and Streets) --On March 17th, the Council received the Feasibility Report for Project 491 and scheduled t e public hea ing to be held April 21st. Enclosed on pages through & is a copy of the Feasibility c Report for the Counils information and reference during this public hearing. Several meetings have been held with major developers within this area to ensure capatability with their proposed developments. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners who would be assessed under this project. Our consulting engineer who prepared this Feasibility Report will provide additional information during the public hearing presentation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 491 (Eagan Hills Farm - Trunk Utilities and Streets) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. Z3 FOR AN HILLS FARMS UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS t .BILE No. 40410 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS Si. PAUL, MINNESOTA 74 'I 11 Bonest any Rasene, nderlik & ,Associates, Inc. 2336 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers fir ,Architects St. Paas;, PON 6_'14713 6 2 635 41;40n "Iarch 16, 1987 ilf L--gan 38:30 Pilot K..nob Road a� an, ?� 5122 Re- Eagan bilis Farms Utilitiy y Street improvement Project No. 491 Our File No. 49410 Dear Mayo;- & Council: Orin G. Bnnestruo, ic tF- Robert W. Rose-. P. f..' Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner. P.P.. James C. Olson, P.E. Glenn R. Caok. P.E. Keith A. Gordon, P.E. Thames E. Noyes, P.t. Richard W. Fnsrer, Y.E. Robert G. Schunu•ht. A-1. Marvin L. Suryala, P.E. Donald C. Burgardr, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mork A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K Field. P.E. .kfichae/ 7. Rautmunn, r'.Ii. Robert R. PfrJferle, P U. Du yid O. Luskotu, P_ E. Thamas W. Peterson, a ._. Al,chuel C. Ivy ,h. P. F. Boren L. Waits, P.E. .lames R. A9a1and. P Xenrteth A Anderson r Sevh A. do, h.tonr., '... Ala, k R Ruffs. P.L. Robert C. Russet, A.i.... :'humus E. ,1 Srntl L.. onne. i .... L.eu M. P-1YA..v Harlan hl. (Iran Susan M. kh^rhn Enclosed is our report for Eagan Hills Farms, Project No. 491. This report covers utility and street improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of thi^ re -port. Yours very tr;il.y, BONEST OO, ,ROS, E, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, Ii3C. Mark(C. Hanson MAER : 1 i Encl. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under -my direct supervision and `-at I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the/St<st� offalinnesota. OF A —r� Mark A. Hanson Approved by: .Yepartment of Public Works Date: SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk sanitary= sewer, water main, storm sewer, and collector streets to serve the Eagan Hills Farms Planned Residential Development. Eagan Hills Farms includes two plats called Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge located southerly of Wescott Road and westerly of Dodd Road. The two plats comprise of a total of approximately 220 acres with Bridle Ridge containing 203 lots and Stone Bridge containing 196 lots. Eagan -hills Farms will be served internally by two neighborhood collar_- tors. The extensions of Elrene Road from Wescott Road to Dodd Road and a north/south collector extending southerly from Elrene Road connecting to the future extension of Northview Park Road from Lexington Avenue to Dodd Road. Each of these neighborhood collectors are designated as Municipal State Aid Street. Therefore, the plans and specifications for street surfacing will be prepared in accordance with Municipal State Aid Standards and will be submit- ted to Mn/DOT for their review and ultimate approval. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project as outlined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as two contracts. Contract I would include the construction of all utili- ties. Contract II would include the street surfacing for Elrene Road and the north/south collector road between Northview Park Road and Elrene Road. The plans and specifications for Contract II would be prepared in accordance with Municipal State Aid Standards and be submitted to the State Aid Office for their review and ultimate approval. TT n P9T nY^M. Sanitary Sewer - To serve Eagan Hills Farms with sanitary sewer will require the installation of a major lift station located east of Dodd Road and north of Co. Rd. No. 30 as shown on the attached drawing. The lift station is loca- Page 1. 2534e / ?j ted within Parcel 014-80 (proposed Country Hollow development is presently be- ing processed through the City). Therefore, the installation of the lift sta- tion will require the grading of this development to occur prior to its con- struction. The size of the lift station based on Eagan Hills Farms and the proposed developments presently being reviewed by the City within this sani- tary sewer district is 2.98 million gallons Fer day. This requires the prepa- ration of an Environmental Assessment worksheet (EAW) to determine if an En- viromental Impact Statement (EIS) will be required. A 12" force main will be constructed from the lift station to the existing trunk sanitary sewer in Co. Rd. 30 and Dodd Road. Trunk sanitary sewer extensions from the lift station are shown on the attached drawing located at the back of this report. Trunk facilities range in size from 15" to 10" in diameter. The appropriate number of service wyes and risers from the trunk sewer will be constructed to serve the abutting residential lots. Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a 12" trunk main in Elrene Road from Wescott Road to Dodd Road. An 8" main is also proposed to be constructed in the west side of Dodd Road from Wescott Road to Elrene Road and a 12" trunk from this point to the most southerly cul-de-sac in Stone Bridge. A 16" trunk main will be constructed in Northview Park Road from Elrene Road to the south line of Bridle Ridge and ultimately connect to the future 16" trunk main extension along Northview Park Road. Eagan Hills Farms is included in the intermediate pressure zone and will experience static and residual pressures of 72.0 and 53.0 psi respectively. STORM SEWER: Storm sewer is separated into three systems discussed as follows: 1.) Bridle Ride (Elrene Road and -Pond JP -21 Outlet): Storm sewer proposed herein includes the extension of storm sewer northerly from Pond JP -21 within easements to Elrene Road and continuing north in Elrene Road as shown on the Page 2. 2534e Z% attached drawing. The storm sewer is sized to convey runoff within Elrene Road and the adjacent Bridle Ridge development southerly of Wescott Road. The storm sewer has been sized based on a detention area providing 1.2 acre-feet of storage east of Elrene Road and south of Wescott Road as shown on the at- tached of the drawing. Also included is the construction of the storm sewer outlet for Pond JP -21 which requires the construction of a submersible lift station and force main. The lift station is proposed to be located or. the northerly side of Pond JP -21. A 16" diameter force main will be extended northerly and easterly from the lift station to Elrene Road and northerly in Elrene Road connecting to the existing 30" storm sewer in Wescott Road. It is also proposed to construct a bituminous access drive over the force main to the lift station from Elrene Road. 2.) Bridle Ridge & Stone Bridge (Pond JP -22 to JP -21 and Northview Part: Road): Storm sewer proposed herein includes the outlet for Pond JP -22 to JP -21 and the extension of storm sewer in the north -south collector road to Elrene Road and is designed to convey runoff within vorthview Park Road and the adjacent areas of Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge development which are tributary to it. 3.) Stone Bridge (Pond JP -55. JP -54, JP --79 to JP -21): Storm sewer proposed herein includes the storm sewer outlets from Pond JP -55, JP -54, and JP -79 to JP -21 as shown on the attached drawing. Also included is the extension of the upstream storm sewer from Pond JP -21 to Dodd Road which will serve as the future outlet for Pond JP -26 located east of Dodd Road. In addition, a storm sewer extension is proposed northerly from Pond JP -79 within the park abutting both Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge which is sized based on a detention area of 1.4 acre feet being provided in the northerly part of the park immediately south of Wescott Road. Each of these storm sewers are designed not only to Page 3. 2534e Z convey the runoff from each pond but also the direct runoff that they collect as they progress between each pond. Design considerations for each pond included herein is listed below: Comp. Plan Proposed Comp. Plan Proposed Pond Storage Storage Outflow Outflow Description (Ac. -ft.) (Ac. -ft.) (cfs) Pond JP -26 186.7 83.8 1.5 3.1 Pond JP -55 -- 2.81 1.0 1.0 Pond JP -54 14.7 2.3 i•0 1.3 Pond JP -79 -- 7.9 -- 1•C Pond JP -22 59.2 59.2 1.9 =1.7 Pond JP -21 96.5 93.6 6.3 6.3 STREET: Street construction proposed herein includes the surfacing of Elrene Road from Wescott Road to Dodd ?toad and the north -south collector road :south from Elrene Road to the south line of Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge. Each of these collector roads are to be upgraded to a 36' width which provdes .for two driving lanes and a single parking lane on one side. The parking lane could be provided on the north and east side of Elrene Road abutting the park. The parking lane on Northview Park Road is to be located on the east side. hn S' bituminous trail is to be located on the same side as the parking lane along each of the collector roads. It is assumed for purposes of this report the grading of the collector roadways will be done by the developer as part of the grading of their development. However, it is assumed the grading required for the connection of Elrene Road to Dodd Road outside of Stone Bridge will be done as part of this project. EASEMENTS: Permanent and temporary construction easements are required for the construction of utilities and streets proposed herein. it is assumed for purposes of this report the approval of plat east of Dodd Road will occur Such that easements will not be required for construction of the lift station, Page 4. 2534e Z r force main, and trunk sewer within this plat. Therefore, the only easements required east of Dodd is for the extension of trunk sanitary sewer across Par- cel 013-80. gest of Dodd Road the only easement required is for the extension of Elrene Road to Dodd Road. The construction of the water main along Dodd Road is proposed to be located within the existing •right-of-way. Listed below is the estimated amount of temporary and permanent easement required from each parcel 'for this project. Page 5. 2534e 86 Permanent Temporary Easement Easement Parcel Description (Acre) (Acre) SE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 013-80 0.31 1.5 NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-06 0.22 0.4 Page 5. 2534e 86 AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESS4ENT AREA SE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 013-80 Parcel 014-80 Parcel 010-78 Parcel. 010-79 Parcel 012-80 SW 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-50 (Stone Bridge, Bridle Bridge) Parcel 010-51 (Stone Bridge, Bridle Ridge) Parcel 010-52 Parcel 010-54 NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-01 Parcel 012-02 Parcel 011-02 Parcel 010-08 Parcel 010-07 Parcel 010-03 (Stone Bridge, Bridle Ridge) Parcel 010-04 (Stone Bridge) Parcel 010-05 Parcel 010-06 NW 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-26 (Stone Bridge, Bridle Ridge) Parcel 010-27 (Stone Bridge, Bridle Ridge) Parcel 010-28 (Bridle Ridge) Parcel 011-25 (Stone Bridge, Bridle Ridge) Parcel 012-25 (Bridle Ridge) NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 Parcel 010-02 Page 6. 2534e 31 COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are praesented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized below: CONTRACT I Sanitary Sewer $ 684,650 Water Main 424,050 Services 2,390 Storm Sewer a. Bridle Ridge (Elrene Road & Pond JP -21 Outlet) 475,500 b. Bridle Ridge & Stone Bridge (Pond JP -22 to JP -21 and ?orthview Park Road) 209,500 c. Stone Bridge (Pond JP -55, JP -54, JP -79 to JP -21 and Dodd Road to JP -21) 400,160 TOTAL CONTRACT I ..................................... $2,196,250 Street Surfacing $ 454,290 TOTAL CONTRACT II .................................... $ 454,290 TOTAL CONTRACT I AND II .............................. $2,650,540 The total estimated project cost for Contract I and II is $2,650,540 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right-of-way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are es- timated at 25% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond inter- est. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. The assessments will be spread over 15 years. The interest rates will be based upon the bond sale issue used to finance this project. Page 7. 2534e 57- SANITARY SEt7ER: Sanitary sewer proposed herein is considered trunk. There- fore, it is proposed to assess those areas benefiting From the trunk sanitary sewer their related trunk area assessment. In addition, it is proposed to as- sess those lots and parcels abutting the trunk sewer the lateral benefit from trunk rate in accordance with the City of Eagan Fee schedule for 1987. WATER i-1A N: Water main proposed herein is consieered trunk. Therefore, it is proposed to assess those areas benefiting from tac trunk water hain their re- lated trunk area assessment. In addition, it is proposed to assess those lots and parcels abutting the trunk water main 50% of the lateral benefit from trunk rate in accordance with City of Eagan Fee Schedule for 1987. The frent- footage abutting the Eagan Hills Farm Park is proposed to be assessed. i_ow- ever, its assessment is spread over all the assessable footage proposed herein located gest of Dodd Road. Therefore, the assessment rate per front foot is somewhat higher for the frontage west of Dodd Road than east of Dodd Road. SERVICES: Services for water are proposed to be assessed to the benefittingy property they serve. However, the cost of jacking the water service under Dodd Road is considered trunk and is not proposed to be assessed. STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is separated into three parts as previously discussed. Each part is further separated into trunk and lateral. Trunk area storm sewer is proposed to be assessed on an area basis in accor- dance with the City of Eagan 1987 Fee Schedule to those parcels shown on the attached drawing. a.) Bridle Rid-,e (Elrene Road and Pond JP--21 Outlet): Trunk storla sewer in- cluded herein is all costs associated with constructing the outlet for Ford JP-21 (Lift station, inlet pipe, force main, access drive). All remaining costs are considered lateral and are proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis to Bridle Ridge. Page 8. 2534e 33 b.) Bridle Ridge & Stone Bridge (Pond JP -22 to JP -21 and,N-S Collector Road): Trunk storm sewer included herein is the storm sewer between Pond JP -21 to JP -22. However, lateral storm sewer costs were determined by designing the most economical storm sewer system conveying the runoff to Pond JP -21 and JP -22 assuming the interconnection of ponds with storm sewer is not required. The lateral storm sewer is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis be- tween Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge based on the front footage from each de- velopment which abuts the storm sewer. c.) Stone Bridge (Pond JP -55, JP -54, JP -79 to JP -7.1 and Dodd Road to JP -21): Trunk storm sewer included herein is the storm sewer interconnecting Pond JP -55, JP -54, JP -79 and JP -21 and a 12" equivalent from JP -21 to Dodd Road which will Provide the future outlet for Pond JP -26 east of Dodd Road. How- ever, lateral storm sewer costs were determined by designing the most economi- cal storm sewer system conveying the runoff .to the various ponds assuming the interconnection of ponds is not required. Lateral storm sewer is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis between Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge. The only portion to be assessed to Bridle Ridge is the front footage abutting the westerly half of the northerly storm sewer extension from Pond JP -79. STREET: It is proposed to assess street on a front foot basis based on the calculated assessment rate presented in Appendix C. however, because the platted property will not have direct driveway access it is proposed to assess the abutting property 50% of the residential equivalent rate presented in Ap- pendix C. It is not proposed to assess the front footage which abuts the park in Eagan Hills Farm. Page 9. 2534e 3� TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates established in 1987 City of Eagan Fee Schedule proposed to be assessed as part of this project are as fol- lows: Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area $1,300.00/ac. Lateral Benefit from Trunk $15.06/F.F. Water -Main Trunk Area $1,250.00/ac. 50% Lateral Benefit from Trunk $ 6.24/F.F. 50% Lateral Benefit from Trunk Including Eagan Hills Farm Park frontage $ 7.09/F.F. Storm Sewer Trunk Area - Residential $0.053/sq.ft. Page 10. 2534e REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed below: Project Cost Revenue Balance SANITARY SEWER Trunk $ 684,650 Trunk Area Assessment Lateral Benefit from Trunk $ 684,650 WATER MAIN Trunk $ 424,050 Trunk Area Assessment Lateral Benefit from Trunk SERVICES Trunk $ 950 Lateral 1,440 Lateral Assessment $ 2;390 STORM SEWER Trunk $ 609,780 Lateral 475,380 Trunk Area Assessment Lateral Assessment $1,085,160 STREET Street r $ 454,290 Street Assessment I .- The anticipated project deficit is —$3711868. Page 11. 2534e $ 499,460 153,010 $ 652,470 —$32,180 8 311,000 108,502 $ 419,502 —$ 4,548 1,440 $ 1,440 $ —950 $ 621,329 475,460 $1,0963,789 +$ 11,629 $_108,471 $ 108,471 —$345,819 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public nearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due w/Real Estate Taxes Page 12. 2534e 3, ,Ir%M'rD A P9` s March 18, 1987 April 21, 1987 May 19, 1987 June 16, 1987 Fall 1987 Spring 1988 May 1989 CONTRACT II March 17, 1987 April 21, 1987 June 15, 1987 July 21, 1987 Summer 1988 Fall 1988 May 1989 APPEATDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE EAGAN HILLS FARMS UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 491 CONTRACT I A. SANITARY SEDER 200 Lin.ft. 18" Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $34.00/lin.ft. $ 6,800 3,700 Lin.ft. 15" Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $40.00/lin.ft. 148,000 90 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 15" sanitary sewer @ $200.00/lin.ft. 18,000 1,850 Lin.ft. 10" Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $40.00/1in.ft. 74,000 31 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each 31,000 87 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. in pl. @ $70.00/lin.ft. 6,090 24 Lin.ft. 8" Outside drop @ $120.00/lin.ft. 2,880 1 Each 18" x 4" wye in pl. @ $100.00/each 100 44 Each 15" x 4" wye in place @ $100.00/each 4,400 21 Each 10" x 4" Wye in place @ $80.00/each 1,680 11 Each 8" x 4" wye in place @ $60.00/each 660 1,350 Lin.ft. 12" Force main in place @ $24.00/lin.ft. 32,400 80 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 12" force main @ $150.00/lin.ft. 12,000 LUMP SUM Lift station in place @ $150,000.00/L.S. 150,000 480 Lin.ft. 4" Riser pipe @ $26.00/lin.ft. 12,480 1,000 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 10,000 LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $4,000.00/L.S. 4,000 7,150 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 7,150 Total $521,640 +5% Contingencies 26,080 $547,720 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 136,930 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................. $684,650 Page 13. 2534e 39 B. WATER MAIN 1,400 Lin.ft. 16" Water main in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. $ 42,000 7,210 Lin.ft. 12" Water main in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 158,620 2,600 Lin.ft. 8" Water main in pl. @ $17.00/iin.ft. 44,200 900 Lin.ft. 6" Water main in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft. 12,600 7 Each hydrant @ $1,000.00/each 7,000 2 Each 0" Butterfly valve & box @ $1,200.00/each 2,1:00 8 Each 12" Butterfly valve & box @ $750.00/aach 6,000 25 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $350.00/each 8,750 22,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.00/lb. 22,000 2 Each Connect to existing water main @ $500.00/each 1,000 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00,/cu.yd. 1,000 12,110 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 12,110 8.0 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac. 12,000 3,000 Sq.yds. Sod w/topsoil @ $2.00/sq.yd. _ 6,000 Total $323,080 +5% Contingencies i6, 160 $339,240 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 84,810 TOTAL WATER MAIN ................................. $424,050 Page 14. 2534e q 3 C. SERVICES 140 Lin.ft. 1" water service in place @ $8.00/lin.ft. 60 Lin.ft. Penumagophe 1" water service @ $20.00/lin.ft. 4 Each 1" Curb stop and box @ $80.00/ea. 4 Each 1" Corporation stop @ $30.00/ea. 140 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies -x•25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL SERVICES .................................... Page 15. 2534e 4 $ 1,120 120 320 120 140 $1,820 90 Y1,910 480 $2,390 D. STORM SEWER 1.) Bridle Rid --e (Elrene Road and Pond JP -21 Outlet) 60 Lin.ft. 30" Storm sewer in pl. @ $40.00/lin.ft. $ 2,400 1,420 Lin.ft. 27" Storm sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft. 51,120 1,160 Lin.ft. 21" Storm sewer in. pl. @ $30.00/1in.ft. 34,800 2,700 Lin.ft. 16" Force main in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft. 86,400 200 Lin.ft. 15" Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 4,400 11 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each 11,000 10 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 8,000 LUMP SUM Submersible lift station @ $120,000/L.S. 120,000 330 Lin.ft. 18" Inlet pipe @ $40.00/lin.ft. 13,200 1 Each 30" Flared end w/trash guard @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 1,400 Sq.yds. Bituminous access drive w/aggreg, base @ $10.00/sq.yd. 14,000 12 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 600 3.0 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac. 4,500 500 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 5,000 5,870 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 5,870 Total $362,290 +5% Contingencies 18,110 $380,400 +25% Legal, Engrng., .Admin. & Bond Interest 95,_100 TOTAL STORM SEWER (a.) ........................... $475,500 Page 16. 2534e W 2.) Bridle Ride & Stone Bridle (Pond JP -22 to JP -21 and N -S Collector Road: 520 Lin.ft. 48" Storm sewer in pl. @ $80.00/lin.ft. $ 413600 250 Lin.ft. 42" Storm sewer in pl. @ $74.00/lin.ft. 18,500 500 Lin.ft. 27" Storm sewer in pl. @ $50.00/lin.ft. 25,000 40 Lin.ft. 21" Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 1,200 500 Lin.ft. 18" Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. 13,000 990 Lin.ft. 15" Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lia.ft. 27,720 10 Each STd. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/:each 11,000 13 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 10,400 1 Each 48" Flared end w/trash guard @ $2,000.00/each 2,000 1 Each 15" Flared end w/trash guard @ $600.00/each 600 16 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 800 2.0 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac. 3,000 200 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,000 2,800 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,800 Total $159,620 +5% Contingencies 7,980 $167,600 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest -41,900 TOTAL STORM SEWER (b.) ............................ $209,500 Page 17. 2534e �9 3.) Stone Bridge (Pond JP -55, JP -54, JP --79 ti JP -21 and Dodd Road to JP -21): 50 Lin.ft. 42" Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/1in.ft. $ 3,000 1,150 Lin.ft. 36" Storm sewer in pl. @ $66.00/1in.ft. 75,900 190 Lin.ft. 33" Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/lin. ft. 11,400 700 Lin.ft. 30" Storm sewer in pl. @ $56.00/lin.ft. 39,200 300 Lin.ft. 27" Storm sewer in p1. @ $50.00/lin. ft. 15,000 320 Lin.ft. 24" Storm sewer in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft. 10,240 290 Lin.ft. 21" Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 8,120 730 Lin.ft. 18" Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 20,440 110 Lin.ft. 15" Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/liii.ft. 2,420 2,010 Lin.ft. 12" Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 44,220 80 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 12" storm sewe @ $100.00/lin.ft. 8;000 26 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,500.00/each 39,000 5 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 4,000 1 Each 42" Flared end w/trash guard @ $1,600.00/each 1,600 1 Each 24" Flared end w/trash guard @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 3 Each 12" Flared end w/trash guard @ $500.00/each 500 40 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 2,000 4.0 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac. 6,000 500 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 5,000 LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $2,000.00/L.S. 2,000 5,850 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 5,850 Total $304,890 +5% Contingencies 15,240 $320,130 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 80,030 TOTAL STORM SEWER (c.) ............................ $400,160 Page 18. 2534e ¢3 CONTRACT II A. STREET SURFACING 24,000 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation (street) @ $0.40/sq.yd. 6,400 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation (trail) @ $1.00/sq.yd. 500 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3,00/cu.yd. 300 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 15,100 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (street) @ $5.00/ton 2,400 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (trail) @ $6.00/ton 3,800 Ton Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton 1,900 Ton Bituminous wear course (street) @ $18.00/ton 700 Ton Bituminous wear course (trail) @ $18.00/ton 365 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $160.00/ton 1,100 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.00/gal. 11,400 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 80 Each Adjust utility structure @ $150.00/each 13.0 Acres Seeding w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac. Total +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL STREET SURFACING ............................ Page 19. 2534e 4 $ 9,920 6,400 1,500 1,800 75,500 14,400 41,800 34,200 12,600 58,400 1,100 57,000 12,000 19,500 $346,120 179310 $363,430 90,860 $454,290 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL EAGAN HILLS FARMS UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 491 A. SANITARY SEWER a.) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel Assessable Total Descri )tion Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment SE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 013-80 1,200 $15.06(1) 18,072 Parcel 014-80 (Country Hollow) 3,140 15,06 $ 47,288 SW 1/4, SECTION 24 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-51, 010-50) 3,360 $15.06 50,602 NE 1/4, SECTION 24 (Elrene Road) Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-04) NW 1/4, SECTION 24 (Elrene Road, Canter Glen Lane) Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010-28) 2,460 $15.06 _37,048 17,380 8153,010 (1) Assessment Rate from "City of Eagan Fee Schedule." Page 20. 2534e 05 b.) Trunk Area Sanitary Sewer Parcel 1,300 $ 2,080 Area Credit Description 26.9 1,300 (Acs.) (Acre) SE 1/4, SECTION 24 9.6 1,300 Parcel 013-80 1,300 25 Street 20% Parcel '014 -80 (Country Hollow) 40 Pond 1.8 11.6 1,300 15,080 Street 20. SW 1/4} SECTION 24 Parcel 010-50 (Bridle Ridge) 2.0 Street 20% Parcel 010-50 (Stone Bridge) 3.1 Street 20% Parcel 010-50 (Unplatted) 34.7 Pond 1.1 Street 20% Parcel 010-51 (Stone Bridge) 19.8 Pond 0.5 Street 20% Parcel 010-51 (Unplatted) 12.5 Pond 0.5 Street 20% Parcel 010-54 29.4 Street 20% NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-03 (Stone Bridge) 47.0 Pond 0.6 Street 20% Parcel 010-03 (Bridle Ridge) 7.2 Street 20% Parcel 010-04 (Stone Bridge) 14.7 Pond 0.2 Street 20% Page 21. 2534e q6 Assessable Total Area Rate/Ac. Assessment 20 $1,300i1) $ 26,000 30.6 1,300 39,780 1.6 1,300 $ 2,080 2.5 1,300 3,250 26.9 1,300 34,970 15.4 1,300 20,020 9.6 1,300 12,480 23.5 1,300 30,550 37.1 1$00 $ 48,230 5.8 1,300 7,540 11.6 1,300 15,080 b.) Trunk Area Sanitarz, Sewer (Contd.) Parcel Total Area Area Credit Description 14.1 (Acs.) (Acre) NW 1/4, SECTION 24 1,690 6.5 1,300 Parcel 010-26 (Stone Bridge) 18.2 Pond 0.6 61,100 15.5 1,300 20,150 11.5 Street 203 Parcel 010-26 (Bridle Ridge) 1.6 Street 20% Parcel 010-27 (Stone Bridge) 3.1 Street 20% Parcel 010-27 (Bridle Ridge) 31.6 Street 20% Parcel 010-28 (Bridle Ridge) 59.2 Pond 0.5 Street 2.0% Parcel. 010-28 (Unplatted) 19.9 Pond 0.5 Street 20% Parcel 011-25 (Bridle Ridge) 14.4 Street 20% Parcel 011-25 (Stone Bridge) 0.2 Street 20% Parcel 012-25 (Bridle Ridge) 4.6 STreet 20% NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Assessable Total Area Rate/Ac. Assessment 14.1 $1,300 $ 18,330 1.3 1,300 1,690 6.5 1,300 8,4:0 23.3 1,300 30,290 47.0 1,300 61,100 15.5 1,300 20,150 11.5 1,300 14,950 0.2 1,300 260 3.7 1,300 4,810 Parcel 010-02 54.5 Pond 4.3 40.2 $1,300 $ 52,260 Street 201 Parcel 010-01 58.1 Pond 12.7 36.3 1,300 47,190 Street 20% TOTAL ................................... $499,460 Page '22. 2534e 4-7 B. WATER MAIN a.) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel 7.09 10,281 1,160 Front Descript ion 1,500 7.09 Footage SW 1/4, SECTION 24 709 300 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-51 6.24(1) 7,238 240 (Dodd Road) 200 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-50) 410 Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010-50) 315 NE 1/4, SECTION 24 300 6.24 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-04) 1,450 Parcel 010-06 (Dodd Rd.) 1,160 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-03 (Dodd Rd.) 1,500 Parcel 010-05 (Dodd Rd.) 360 Parcel 012-02 (Dodd Rd.) 300 Parcel 011--02 (Dodd Rd.) 1,160 Parcel 010-08 (Dodd Rd.) 240 Parcel 010-07 (Dodd Rd.) 1,150 SE 1/4, SECTION_ 24 Parcel 010-79 (Dodd Rd.) 460 Parcel 010-78 (Dodd Rd. 720 Parcel 012-80 (Dodd Rd.) 82 Parcel 013-80 (Dodd Rd.) 300 Assessable Total Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment Page 23. 2534e 0 200 $7.0912) $ 1,418 410 7.09 2,907 315 7.09 2,233 1,450 7.09 10,281 1,160 7.09 8,224 1,500 7.09 10,635 100(2) 7.09 709 300 7.09 2,127 1,160 6.24(1) 7,238 240 6.24 1,498 1,150 6.24 7,176 100(2) 6.24 624 100(2) 7.09 709 82 6.24 512 300 6.24 1,872 Parcel Description NW 1/4, SECTION 24 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-26) Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-27) Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010-27) Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010-28) Front Assessable Total Footage Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment 860 860 7.09 6,097 1,120 1,120 7.09 7,941 1,600 1,600 7.09 11,344 3,520 3,520 7.09 24,_957 $108,502 (2) Assessment rate $6.24/F.F. per City of Eagan Fee Schedule increased due to Neighborhood Park assessment being spread over development. ($6.24 + [1,730 F.F. n $6.24 b 12,635 F.F.] = 7.09). Page 24. 2534e 07 b.) Trunk Area Water Main Parcel Area Credit Assessable Total Description (Acs.) (Acre) Area Rate/Ac. Assessment SE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 013-80 25 Street 20;0 20 $1,250(l) $ 25,000 Parcel 014-80 40 Pond 1.8 30.6 1,250 38,250 Street 20% Parcel 010-78 3.1 2.1 (2) 1.0 1,250 1,250 Parcel 010-79 9.9 Street 20% 7.9 1,250 9,875 Parcel 012-80 1.3 ---- 1.3 1,250 1,625 SW 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-50 (Bridle Ridge) 2.0 Street 20% 1.6 $1,250 2,000 Parcel 010-50 (Stone Bridge) 3.1 Street 20% 2.5 1,250 3,125 Parcel 010-50 (Unplatted) 34.7 Pond 1.1 26.9 1,250 33,625 Street 20% Parcel 010-51 (Stone Bridge) 19.8 Pond 0.5 15.4 1,250 19,250 Street 20% Parcel 010-51 (Unplatted) 12.5 Pond 0.5 9.6 1,250 123,000 Street 20% NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-04 (Stone Bridge) 14.7 Pond 0.2 11.6 1,250 14,500 Street 20% Parcel 010-05 4.5 3.5 (2) 1.0 1,250 1,250 Parcel 010-06 8.4 Street 20% 6.7 1,250 8,375 Parcel 010-01 0.8 ---- 0.8 1,250 1,000 Parcel 012-02 2,3 2.3 1,250 2,875 Parcel 011-02 17.7 Street 20% 10.2 1,250 12,750 Parcel 010-08 39.7 Pond 5.0 27.8 1,250 34,750 Street 20% Parcel 010-07 9.8 Street 20% 7.8 1,250 9,750 Page 25. 2534e 4) NW 1%4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-26 (Stone Bridge) 18.2 Pond 0.6 1,625 6.5 1,250 82125 Street 20% Parcel 010--26 (Bridle Ridge) 1.6 Street 20% Parcel 010-27 (Stone Bridge) 8.1 Street 20% Parcel 010-27 (Bridle Ridge) 12.4 Street 20% Parcel 010-28 (Bridle Ridge) 34.8 Pond 0.5 Street 207. Parcel 010-28 (Unplatted) 6.3 Pond 0.5 Street 20% Page 26. 2534e 100/ 14.1 $1,250 $ 17,625 1.3 1,250 1,625 6.5 1,250 82125 9.9 1,250 12,375 27.4 1,250 34,250 4.6 1,250 5,750 $311,000 C. SERVICES Parcel Number Cost/ Total Descrir.tion Service Service Assessment SW 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-05 1-1" 360 $ 360 SE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-78 1-1" 360 360 Parcel 010-79 1--1" 360 360 Parcel 010-80 1-1" 360 360 4 $1,440 Page 27. 2534e 5 D. STOM SEWER a.) Lateral - Bridle Rid._e (Elrene Road and Pond JP -21 Outlet) Parcel assessable Total Description Footaze Rate/F.F. Assessment NW 1/4, SECTION 24 Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010--27 010-28) 5,000 $37.78 $1680,900 5,000 $168,900 b.) Lateral - Bridle Ridge & Stone Bridle (Pond JP -22 to JP -21 and N -S Collector Road) SW 1/4, SECTION 24 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-51) 380 $34.60 $ 13,148 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-50) 830 34.60 28,717 Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010-50) 330 34.60 11,418 NW 1/4, SECTION 24 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-27) 940 $34.60 $ 32,523 Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010-27) 940 34.60 32,523 Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010-28) 120 34.60 4,152 3,540 $122,480 c.) Lateral - Stone Brid e (Pond JP -55, JP -54, JP -79, to JP -21 and Dodd Road to JP -21) SW 1/4 SECTION 24 Stone Bridge Parcel 010-51) 3,180 $21.17 $ 69,030 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-26) 2,920 21.17 63,386 NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-04) 680 $21.17 $ 14,762 NW 1/4, SECTION 24 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-03) 850 $21.17 $ 18,451 Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010-03) 850 21.17 18,451 8,480 $184,080 2534e Page 28. 3 d.) Trunk Area Storm Sewer Parcel 010-25 (Stone Bridge) Area Credit Assessable Rate Total Description (S:j.ft.) (Acre) _ Area Sq.ft. Assessment SW 1/4, SECTION 24 010-26 (Bridle Ridge) 69,700 Street 20% Parcel 010--50 (Bridle Ridge) 87,120 Street 20% 69,700 $0.053 $ 3,694 Parcel 010-50 (Stone Bridge) 135,030 Street 20% 108,020 0.053 5,725 Parcel 010-50 (Unplatted) 1,511,530 Pond 1.1 1,170,890 0.053 62,057 2,578,750 Pond 0.5 2,045,580 0.053 Street 20% Parcel 010-51 (Stone Bridge) 862,490 Pond 0.5 672,570 0.053 35,646 (Unplatted) 866,840 Pond 0.5 676,050 Street 20% 35,831 Parcel 010-51 (Unplatted) 544,500 Pond 0.5 418,180 0.053 223,163 011-25 (Bridle Ridge) 627,260 Street Street 20% 501,810 0.053 26,596 Parcel 010-54 (Unplatted) 1,280,660 Street 20% 1,024,530 0.053 54,300 Parcel 010-52 012-25 83,300 Large Lot 33,000 0.053 1,749 SE 1/4, SECTION 24 TOTAL ...................................... Parcel 010-78� 136,800 Large Lot 55,620 0.053 2,948 NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-03 (Stone Bridge) 2,047,320 Pond 0.6 1,616,950 0.053 85,698 Street 20% Parcel 010-03 (Bridle Ridge) 313,630 Street 20% 250,910 0.053 13,298 Parcel 010-04 (Stone Bridge) 640,330 Pond 0.2 505,290 0.053 26,780 Street 20% Parcel 010-05 196,020 Large Lot 82,500 0.053 4,372 Parcel 010-06 365,900 Pond 0.6 271,810 0.053 14,406 Street 20% NW 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-25 (Stone Bridge) 792,790 Pond 0.6 613,320 0.053 32,506 Street 20% Parcel 010-26 (Bridle Ridge) 69,700 Street 20% 55,760 0.053 2,955 Parcel 010-27 (Stone Bridge) 352,840 Street 20% 282,270 0.053 14,960 Parcel 010-27 (Bridle Ridge) 1,376,500 Street 20% 1,101,200 0.053 58,364 Parcel 010-28 (Bridle Ridge) 2,578,750 Pond 0.5 2,045,580 0.053 108,416 Street 20% Parcel 010-28 (Unplatted) 866,840 Pond 0.5 676,050 0.053 35,831 Street 20% Parcel 011-25 (Bridle Ridge) 627,260 Street 20% 501,810 0.053 26,596 Parcel 011-25 (Stone Bridge) 8,710 Street 20% 6,970 0.053 369 Parcel 012-25 (Bridle Ridge) 200,380 Street 20% 160,310 0.053 8,496 TOTAL ...................................... $621,329 Page 2 2534e W A. STREET SURFACING Parcel Descriotion SW 1/4; SECTION 24 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-•50) Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010-50) NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-04) Parcel 010-06 NW 1/4., -SECTION 24 Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-26) Stone Bridge (Parcel 010-27) Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010-27) Bridle Ridge (Parcel 010-28) Assessable Rate/ Total Footage F.F. Assessment 410 $11.40(3) $ 4,674 315 11.40 3,591 1,450 $11.40 $ 16,530 240 11.40 2,736 860 $11.40 $ 9,804 1,120 11.40 12,768 1,600 11.40 18,240 3,520 11.40 40 128 TOTAL .................... $108,471 (3) Assessment rate equals half calculated residential equivalent rate ($22.81/2 = $11.40/F.F.) because future platted parcels will not have direct driveway access to collector street. 2534e Page 30. 65 W W .D Q O+ a --1 G t 1O 1n o. Ch .--,1n-1n J rn MT�O W'I N O O .oM 0,� n N W d W O LL7 �O W r .y W •D n O p. M O� O N .D n .•-1 N 1D ^ roN O In V1 O N O V1 O 1D S N O 'D M 1n U 'D D • W 1 r N W f M r N ti N N M 3 00 .S N M •-+ M --i W N 1D �} V1 n O N --• M H m 4 v> Q* 1 O 10 N co .A r O M M r D n .o u•. �n r � M y N W co 61� d •.-. N V\ p H vl Yh N co .7 n M 0 W W N n T d r -1 .DOd n a, - 0 C" NM N Cl M •C O— M n d N C i W W M M i S+ v? �D F <n nr u r d 3 co N � W W .Y w w v� ro v, rnm 16 .D W to p N .. N En u ro M M N aP » o p b Q ro a o. W W N O i7 IV r y CL. Yh a a 0 � a v u H U, "� 0 0 O O q > a .D ID w 3 d t > N a w m o `n`j z 0 0 01n n Ln pv,o 0 o n1no 0 0 0 0 0o Q CH N 0—v —CN r O N O 0 1n u -•h p O N N W •D M O •D O N N M W r n r O n N r Q a'L •..1 ..r D• .-1 N N :7 ..00 . .. _ ...' N O. •-+ .. N W V1 .n 4 4 C O O N M tM�l .N•• .N-. .,..• 4 M H a H C vt s w a m L N a y N Vl M .D O, y r co 00 'o W ro.+ r O N -+ N M -+ O N N M m r M O Q '.� m W -10 O M II1 W N lD W L N •-1 M O ro 00 o a000 0 0 0 O W r tb r 00 1n --1 d It 4 wl 10 N N C •p T M N$ N O M r r C4 a r N CN •fN N M N M •-� M .D N N d H 4 En N N I y N ro u . r1 C N W N W O W O .y [n. to O N •D O p N w W r O r m M ro b ...7 VT N Q•} 3 O •D w .-' N N O M O p V\ y V O N 1 1 O O 1 T o O u O O C1 E1 O U u M N 7 N N N N r N N 0 C o z V 2. r to Z Q O O O I I 6 1 I O v I v l 1.4 H- O O co T O 6 co r- r W �' I-• O •-•) O O r+ 7 N Ill +n •1 Vl v1 H F O �1 --. C (D .D N N W r CD N .-+ O O C G O O H O Q1 .--• 1i1 Oq N N H •-1 C7 O b V I 1 1( 1 U 0 eno 1 1 1 1 0 V O 1 SOC 1 t I I I I I J u �O 000 0 t VAI 1 WM d0 C N W 0 -t] 'a 00 00 W'D 'n 00 r,1 •-+ 00 O , w'O b O w!O O u 0 00 0 0 N Cd O1 0 0 O O >,. O1 K N O C O 0 G 0 0 4 r 6t r 1n O O P •' tl0 u U . 1r u u 1n N N N p�0 F 01 N d N m d W ro N N W W O to r R 41 N 6' d N O1 U ti. v O •-' O N N '� @! 31 F U u .-1 U u V J u •-� C P+ "D d u u u U -' C P• .r p, u u u u u u U .•• G •-• •C .-• .� u ,•r U U Lr m N N 1+ 1. 1. O v •.+ v N N N N O v v ••+ N N N N N 61 N O O •M [7 O W N b ro d, 7 ro m M m M x a, N m m M m µW] U N m M m M M m to f N V ro �s7 ro C, i VI P. P. W a- A. to N ID P.. W P. P. 7. VI CO P. P. !�. A• A, d P. .1'. VI to d r a a ,0 APPENDIX C CALCULATED ASSESSMENT RATE PROJECT NO. 491 A. STREET SURFACING a) Residential Equivalent Rate (32' wide street) 2 Sq.Yds. .04 Cu.Yds. .03 Cy.Yds. 0.73 Ton 0.16 Ton 0.16 Ton 0.0176 Ton 0.086 Gals. 1 Lin.Ft. 0.00069 Acre Subgrade preparation @ $0.40/S.Y. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/C.Y. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/C.`.:, Aggregate Base Cl. 5, (6" Thick ) @ $5.00/Ton Base course mixture, (111 Thick) 2331 @ $11.00/Ton Wear course mixtrue, (12" Thick) @ $12.00/Ton Bituminous mat'1 for mixture @ $160.00/Ton Bituminous mat'l for tack coat @ $1.00/Gal. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/L.F. Restoration @ $1,500.00/Ac. +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL Page 32. 2534e Rate/F.F. Y0.80 0.12 0.18 3.65 1.76 1.92 2.82 0.09 5.00 1.04 17.38 0.87 18.25 4.56 22.81 L L WESCOTT Lq010 7 ;PROPOSED -SANITARY 3 EWER ER rl r 24 010-T9 C12-80 013-60 010-54 PROPOSED LIFT z) 1A I luin 20-58 010-55 011-5i 012-53 011-56 jLuz 010-53 4 > 010-59 010-60 020-60 CIT.'( PROJECT No. 191 `-PROPOSED FORCE MAIN E�aiSTING SANITARY SEWER 012.02 011-02 I 010-08 14 ,j Lq010 7 ;PROPOSED -SANITARY 3 EWER ER rl r 24 010-T9 C12-80 013-60 010-54 PROPOSED LIFT z) 1A I luin 20-58 010-55 011-5i 012-53 011-56 jLuz 010-53 4 > 010-59 010-60 020-60 CIT.'( PROJECT No. 191 `-PROPOSED FORCE MAIN E�aiSTING SANITARY SEWER 012.02 011-02 I 017-73 Z016.716 15'1 065 -76 .-76 01r 0 01 4 - q765 ROAD EAGAN HILLS FARMS BONESROO, ROSENIE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES. INC. UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Engineers & Architects ANITARY SEWER St. Paul, Minnesota S [ Date:MAR. 193ij fc'o'r E EAGAN, Mit"O 4NESTA Comm. 49410 FIG. 1 010-08 14 050-75 o zw 1z 012-76 017-73 Z016.716 15'1 065 -76 .-76 01r 0 01 4 - q765 ROAD EAGAN HILLS FARMS BONESROO, ROSENIE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES. INC. UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Engineers & Architects ANITARY SEWER St. Paul, Minnesota S [ Date:MAR. 193ij fc'o'r E EAGAN, Mit"O 4NESTA Comm. 49410 FIG. 1 S:.LH:7I3H JAMS W.RANI ITY PROJECT No. 491 EAGAN HILLS FARMS TRUNK AREA ASSESSEMEN TS SANITARY SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA BOIlESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLJK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date:MAR. 199" FIG. 2 Comm. 49410 ROAD L8 —----I� e - -- - - , +Ex. 120 -- __el 4012-02 ;EAGAN NIL LS; FARMS PARK./`' o ` I oto-ae otrl -•2s JIB }`tier- Via I�� 010-06 I,. x.'1_1 % �F 1 ("�°� 'kj I Gam. 010-07 $U 010 05 A a 7 a � 4 PROPOSED WATER _ViA is _ -- � 4 ` (s -1 Axa 4 � 4y 010-79 Zt KI - 5Q 0I0•-31 ; 013-e0 010-76 (W/q 010-53 �+ap 1 1 1,1�•� L--' I 082-76 r- _ 010 .54 010-59 t ' '�'`?� 016.76 0l6-76 020-N - + I- 014-76 f---1 010-60 00.56 011-36 012-58 011-533 ;MFF'" -EY 020-601j ROAD i 1 1 LATERAL BENEFIT ASSESSEMENT CITY PROJECT 1�1o. 491 8........... LATERAL BENEFIT ASSESSEMENT (Includes Eagan Hiliis Forms Pirkk rronta2e)) EAG7N HILLSFARMS FJONES ROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, HIC. UTILI f `u' IMPROVEMENTS Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minne-roto WATER MAIND ate:It�l�R. 1 ��� �IC�. EAGA , MINNESOTA Comm. ���34`a� � !UH912H ?nomS WHAM CITY PROJECT �,9o. 491 EAGAN MILLS FARMS TRUNK AREA a SSESSEMEN T S WATER MAIN E GAN, MINNESOTA B®NESTRd0, RCSENE. ANDERUK & ASSOCIA7—E.S,, Nc. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date:MAR. 198 FIG. 4 Conrim. 4941A0" 9 41 d 0 q tai N 1I ix O x�m o w W y0W to O 3¢W ZZ X�W I j�W W I/I N _ LL U. LL II` � � i j � CITY PROJECT No. 491 IT w BEEN om y A — W 0w r, w A� ry ppm :9'r ro __ i~!1 V � N Al I p � O J- a 1__- -..J_1 LTL1� /I� 11 ', �I^- J,- fes~ EA RN HILLS FARMS UTILITY IMPROVEME14T S STORM SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIA `S, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Comm. 49410 1 © ti N 1I ix O x�m o w W y0W to O 3¢W ZZ X�W I j�W W I/I N _ LL U. LL II` � � i j � CITY PROJECT No. 491 IT w BEEN om y A — W 0w r, w A� ry ppm :9'r ro __ i~!1 V � N Al I p � O J- a 1__- -..J_1 LTL1� /I� 11 ', �I^- J,- fes~ EA RN HILLS FARMS UTILITY IMPROVEME14T S STORM SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIA `S, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Comm. 49410 1 a �UR012H ?AO&9 &.MAY CITY PROJECT No. 491 EAGAN HILLS FARKAS TRUHK AREA ASSESSEKiENTS STORKI SEWER EAW-A.1% MINNESOTA DONESTROO, ROSENE, AINDERUK & ASSOCi-ATIES, fiNC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date:MAR. 1190 Comm. 49410 Iii /Illlhn��SCOTT 010-151 -- oto -0o L� -� oto-�s Ott-s� otz-� � olt-ala r OI 0-03 BONE5TROO, ROSENE, ANDERLJlt SSS®C! A 77ES, INC. i. Ennineers & Architects S¢. Paul, MinnLLameam' AR �0117; - 0 L esota V ". � 010.06 <\ I 010 -IDS R y 016-76 1/ 010-oi �� Ij 1 ` 6618 CONC. CURB] 2d F -F 8 GUTTER 014.75 36' 010-79 F_ ' 1 012 -BO AkI I1 F `020-rE0- ! 013-80 010 -lib a soe' eoo' 1 aeo' � a OI 0-03 BONE5TROO, ROSENE, ANDERLJlt SSS®C! A 77ES, INC. i. Ennineers & Architects S¢. Paul, MinnLLameam' AR �0117; - 0 L esota CITY PROJECT No. 91 ELAN. MILLS FRMS STREET AND TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS EAGA , MINM SOT ��>� y_,��•�`-0158-80���:�--y//~- 016-76 �� •_/ / 1 `"'-1 1 014.75 1 1 F_ ' 1 I1 `020-rE0- ! 1 I f�� - ® - — e — RESIDENTIAL STREET ASSESSMENT (RATE/RE) CITY PROJECT No. 91 ELAN. MILLS FRMS STREET AND TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS EAGA , MINM SOT Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen PROJECT 494/EAST WESCOTT ROAD - STREETS & UTILITIES B. Project 494, East Wescott Road (Streets and Utilities) --On March 17th, the Council received the Feasibility Report and scheduled the public hearing to be held on April 21st for the installation of utility extensions in the related upgrading of Wescott Road from the Greensboro/Lexington S*te re Development easterly to Dodd Road. Enclosed on pages __ through is is a copy of that Feasibility Report for Councils information and review during the public hearing presentation. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners affected by this project. Our consulting engineer who prepared this Feasibility Report will provide additional information during the public hearing presentations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close public approve/deny Project 494 (East Wescott Road - Streets and and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed specifications. 4.� hearing and Utilities) plans and (1/2 MILE EAST OF LEXINGTON AVE. TO DODD RD.) EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49413 BONESTROO, ROSENE, AN®ERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA z' Bonestro®, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers & Architects St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 ;March 3, 1987 Honorable 'Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Otto G. Bonestroo. P.E. Robert W. Rosette, P.E. lweph C. Anderlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Rtchurd E. Turner, Y.E. James C. Olson, P.E. Re: Wescott Road (12 Aile East of Lexington Ave. to Dodd Rd.) Street and Utility Improvements Project No. 494 File No. 49413 Dear Mayor and Council: Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keith A. Gordon, P.E. Thomas E. Noyes. P. E. Richard W. Faster, P.E. Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. Marvin L. Sorvalu. P.E. Donald C. Burgardr, P.£. Jerry A. Bourdon, Y.E. Murk A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T Rautmann, P.E. Ruben R. PJeffrrle, P.L. David O. Luskata, P.E. Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. Willis, P.E. James R. Muland, P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson, P,E. Keith A. Bachmann, P.E. .Murk R. Rolfs, P.E. Robert C. Rucsek, A.I.A. Thomas E. Angus. P.£. Scott L. Young, P.L. Charles A. Ern-Ason Leo M. Pawrlsky Harlan M. Olson Susan M. Eberlin Enclosed is our report for Wescott Road ('z mile east of Lexington Avenue to Dodd Road), Project No. 494. This report covers utility and street improve- ments and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, Ma Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of/Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson INC. Date: March 3, 1987 Approved b �i T l t /' `7L - PP Y f ' Department of Public Works 2293e Date: `/ /- f 47. Reg. No. 14260 SCOPE: This project provides for upgrading Wescott Road for 1.44 miles to a 52' width (4 lanes) from 1/2 mile east of Lexington Avenue to Dodd Road. The westerly 1/2 mile presently includes a 24' wide gravel road while the easterly section (0.94 miles) has been partially upgraded to its ultimate width. The south side was upgraded only with bituminous surfacing 12' south of centerline and no concrete curb and gutter was constructed. Therefore, with the develop- ment of Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge on the south side, it is proposed the south side be upgraded to its ultimate width at this time. The westerly 1/2 mile is abutted by three proposed developments, Sunrise Hills, Woodlands, and a new elementary school in addition to three unplatted parcels with residen- tial homes. The south side within the westerly 1/2 mile is abutted by two large unplatted parcels which development is proposed in the near future. As previously indicated, the easterly 0.94 miles is abutted by the proposed Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge development on the south while the north side is abut- ted by the existing South Hills and Windtree Additions in addition to West Publishing Co. Wescott Road is designated as Municipal State Aid Street #195-104 in the City of Eagan. Therefore, the plans and specifications will be prepared in accordance with Municipal State Aid Standards and will be submitted to Mn/DOT for their review and ultimate approval. FEASIBILITY AND RECO14MENDATION: The project as outlined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as two contracts. Contract I would include the grading and utility improve- ments and would not be submitted to the State Aid office for their review be- cause the majority of these improvements are not eligible for State Aid Funds. Page 1. 22.93e �� Contract II would include street/trail improvements and would be submitted to the State Aid Office for their review and ultimate approval. DISCUSSION: Saritary Sewer - Sanitary sewer within the westerly 1/2 mile of Wescott Road is proposed to be extended easterly from the existing sanitary sewer construc- ted as part of project No. 457 (Wescott Road - Lexington Avenue to 1/2 mile vast), This sewer will serve the future elementary school and the proposed Sunrise Hills and Woodlands developments in addition to the three unplatted residential parcels abutting Wescott Road. It is not intended that this sani- tary sewer serve she property south of Wescott Road. This property will ulti- mately be served by sewers from the south and the sewers located in the Lex- ington Square Additions. It is also proposed to construct a sanitary sewer from Elrene Road easter- ly to Bridle Ridge Road and is intended to serve only the Bridle Ridge Addi- tion. The sanitary sewer will ultimately extend southerly in Elrene Road as part of the Eagan Bills Farm Addition project which provides for the upgrading of Elrene Road and its utilities. Water Main - Water main proposed herein will interconnect the 12" diameter trunk water main within the westerly 1/2 mile of Wescott Road constructed as part of Project No. 467. A 12" trunk main does exist in the easterly 0.94 miles. Also included,are the required number of hydrants and valves. Services - It is proposed to provide water and sewer services to the existing residential parcels (4" sewer and 1`11 water). It is also proposed to provide sewer and water lateral stubs to serve the elementary school, Sunrise Hills, Woodlands, Bridle Ridge, and Stone Bridge. Sewer lateral stubs are proposed to be 8" while water lateral stubs are proposed to be 6" and 811. Page 2. "_293e (0 Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein is separated into that storm sewer within the westerly 1/2 mile and that storm sewer in the easterly 0.94 miles. The western system is a trunk storm sewer which will provide the outlet for Ponds JP -19 and JP -31 in addition to the direct runoff collected within Wes- cott Road. This section of storm sewer ranges in size from 18" to 48" and re- quires cuts up to 25' deep. The easterly systere includes three separate lateral extensions from the existing storm sewer as shown on the attached drawing. Street - Street construction proposed herein includes upgrading Wescott Road to a 9 ton design thickness and a 52' width within the westerly 1/2 mile. A 5' wide concrete sidewalk is proposed on the north side and an 8' wide bitumi- nous trail is proposed on the south side in conjunction with a 7' wide boule- vard. The alignment of Wescott Road through this section is shifted to the south 8' at its west end to minimize the impact to the pond in front of the elementary school site and the existing unplatted residential parcels immedi- ately east of the school. The alignment through the east end is shifted 11' north to minimize the filling within Pond JP -19 which,is a protected wetland of the Department of Natural Resources. As indicated previously, the easterly 0.94 miles has been upgraded to its ultimate width on the north side with concrete curb and bituminous surfacing. Therefore, construction required on the south side includes concrete curb and bituminous surfacing between the new curb and existing bituminous surface. In addition, it is proposed to construct a ltz" thick bituminous overlay over the entire surface (52' wide) within the easterly 0.94 mile section. A 5' wide concrete sidewalk will also be constructed on the north side and an 8' wide bituminous trail on the south side similar to the westerly 1/2 mile. Page 3, 2293e 76 EASEMENTS: Permanent and temporary easements are required to construct Wes- cott Road. The estimated amount of temporary and permanent easement required from each parcel is listed below. It is assumed for purposes of this report that the proposed developments will dedicate the required amount of easement as part of their development. Page 4. 2293e �j/ Permanent Temporary Parcel Easement Easement Descri2tion (Acre) (Acre) SE 1/4., SECTION 14 Parcel 010-82 0.03 0.06 Parcel 020-82 0.02 0.04 Parcel 020-78 0.02 0.03 NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 0.77 1.0 Page 4. 2293e �j/ AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AREA SE 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 012-81 (Elementary School) Parcel 010-82 Parcel 020-82 Parcel 011-81 (Sunrise mills) Parcel 011-80 (Sunrise Hills) Parcel 012-80 (Sunrise Hills) Parcel 010-76 (Sunrise Hills & Woodlands) Parcel 010-77 (Sunrise Hills & Woodlands) Parcel 010-75 (Woodlands) Parcel 010-78 (Woodlands) Parcel 020-78 MIA, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 Parcel 010-02 NW 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-28 (Bridle Ridge) Parcel 010-27 (Bridle Ridge) Parcel 012-25 (Bridle Ridge) Parcel 011-25 (Bridle Ridge) NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-03 (Bridle Ridge, Stone Bridge) NE 1/4, SECTION 13 Parcel 030-78 LEMBKE IST ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 WEST PUBLISHING CO. 2ND ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 Page 5, 2293e �j _ COST ESTI'RA'iE: Derailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized below: CONTRACT I I. Sanitary Sewer A.) Woodlands, Sunrise Hills & Elementary School $ 96,340 B.) Bridle Ridge 45,210 II. Water Main 99,990 III. Services 20,770 IES. Storm Sewer A.) Woodlands, Sunrise Hills & Elementary School 248,910 B.) Bridle Ridge & Stone Bridge 66,980 V. Street Grading 101,060 TOTAL CONTRACT I ....................... $679,260 I. Street Surfacing A.) Woodlands, Sunrise Bills, & Elementary School $365,590 B.) Bridle Ridge & Stone Bridge 24,450 TOTAL CONTRACT II ..................... $650,040 TOTAL CONTRACT NO. I & II ............. $1,329,300 The total estimated project cost for both Contract I and II $1,329,300 which includes contingencies and all related overhead bu.t does not include any costs associated with right-of-way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assesshents are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined ty the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. P a (>,- 6 2293e 13y S�_RITARY SETER: :unitary sewer serving the Woodlands, Sunrise Hills, and the Elementary School is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis at the lat— eral benefit from trunk -rate per centerline foot established in the City of Eagan Fee Schedule for 1987. It is not intended to assess the south side of Wescott Road through this section because it will be served by future seders from the south or those sewers presently located in the Lexington Square Addi— tions. Trunk area sanitary sewer was preciously assessed in this area as part of Project No. 154. The sanitary sewer serving Bridle Ridge between Elrene Road and Bridle Ridge Road is proposed to be assessed entirely to Bridle Ridge. WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess the trunk water main in Wescott Road on a front foot basis at 50% the lateral benefit from trunk rate per front -foot established in the City of Eagan Fee Schedule for 1987. The assessment to neighborhood park is proposed to be assessed to Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge. This includes all the parcels on both sides of Wescott Road between a point 1/2 mile and 1 mile east of Lexington Avenue. It is also proposed to assess those parcels on the south side of Wescott Road from a point 1 mile east of Lexington Avenue to Dodd Road which were not previously assessed. Trunk area cater main is proposed to be assessed on an area basis in accor— dance with the City of Eagan Fee Schedule to those parcels not previously shown on the drawing located at the back of this report. SERVICES: Services ,are proposed to be assessed to those parcels which they serve based on their final. project cost. STORM SEWER: The storm sewer in Wescott Road abutting the Woodlands, Sunrise Hills, and the Elementary School is considered trunk. Therefore, it is pro— posed to assess those parcels the equivalent rate for lateral storm seiner es— tablished in the City of Eagan Fee Schedule. The storm sewer extensions serv— ing Bridle Ridge and Stone bridge are proposed to be assessed entirely to Page 7. 2293e 7 / those parcels on the south side of Wescott Road between a point 1 raile east of Lexington Avenue and Dodd Road which they serve. Trunk area storm sewer is proposed to be assessed on an area basis in accordance with the City of Eagan Fee Schedule to those. parcels not previously assessed as shoran on the drawing located at the back. of this report. STREET/CRIED AC; It is ^roposed to assess street/grading on a front foot basis. The westerly 1/2 -pile is proposed to be assessed based on the calcula- ted assessment rate presented in .appendix C. Public facility zoned property =ill be assessed the full commercial/ industrial rate which includes 75% of the estimated grading cost as presented in appendix. C. Residential/agriculture property will be assessed the full residential equivalent rate plus 500 of the estimated grading where there is direct driveway access. Residential/agricul- ture property will be assessed 500 of the full residential equivalent rate plus 500 of the estimated grading where there is no direct driveway access. The easterly 0.94 miles is proposed to be assessed in accordance with the equivalent assessment rate established in the City of Eagan Fee Schedule. The property on the north side was previously assessed its equivalent assessment rate at the time Wescott Road was upgraded. Therefore, the property on the south side is proposed to be assessed its residential equivalent rata. Where there is direct driveway access property will be assessed the full residential equivalent rate and 500 of the residential equivalent rate where there is no direct d i -,--Fray access. The (.yuivalent assessment rate_ -or trail as established in ti12 City of Eag,-an Fec:' ...,pie(!U.t..� :?:i_11, be sse; sed i.r, ti _a Z a a se p.arc is vii_- oning ,rea�_er than residential/agricultural. Page L. 2?�)3e 75 TRUi7"K. ASSESSNFE NT RATES: Trunk assessment rates established in the 1987 City of Eagan Fee Schedule proposed as part of this project are listed below. Sanitary Sewer: Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main: Lateral Benefit from Trunk - Residential Lateral Benefit from Trunk - Res. incl. park Trunk Area - Residential/Agricultural Storm Sewer: Equivalent Assessment Roll Trunk Area - Residential/Agricultural Street: City of Eagan Fee Schedule Full Residential Equivalent Rate 50% Residential Equivalent Rate Calculated Assessment Roll (Appendix C) 75% Grading SG�o Grading Full Residential Equivalent Rate 50% Residential Equivalent Rate Commercial/Industrial Equivalent Rate $30.12/centerline foot $ 6.24/front foot $ 6.95/front foot $1,250/acre $10.30/front foot $0.053/sq.ft. $35.44/front foot $17.72/front foot $14.33/front foot $ 9.56/front foot $21.43/front foot $10.72/front foot $46.45/front toot EVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed below. Project Cost Revenue Balance SANITARY SEWER Woodlands, Sunrise Bills Elementary School $ 96,340 Ba idle Ridge 45,210 Lateral assessment $l1s,716 $141,550 $118,716 -$ 22,334 Page 9. 2293e % `LATER i` kIN Trunk Lateral Benefit from Trunk Trunk Area SERVICES .Lateral Lateral Assessment S' C?ud SEWER Lateral Trunk Lateral Assessment Lateral Benefit from Trunk Trunk Area STREET Street. Grading Contract I Street Surfacing Contract II Street/Trull Assessment Project Cost Revenue Ea.L i,Ce $ 99,990 8 68,007 358,275 $ 99,990 $426,282 -x-$326,292 $ 20,770 $ 20,770 $ 20,770 $ 7.0;770 - 0 - $ 66,980 248,910 $ 66,980 50,546 288,732 $315,890 $406,258 +$ 90,368 $101,060 650,040 �252,057 $751;100 $252,057 -$499,043 "$105,'217 'Pre an_iCip.ated protect de-ficit is $105,217. Page 10, 2293e 17 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearin; Approve Plans & Specifications Open Bids/.ward Contract Construction Completion Grading and Utilities Streets, Trails and Restoration Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Dine with Real Estate Taxes Page 11. 2293e 07� March 17, 1987 April 21, 1987 May 19, 1937 June 15, 1987 October 1, 1987 June, 1988 September, 1988 May, 1989 APPENDIX A PRELINU NARY COST ESTIMATE WESCOTT ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVE.•.ENTS PROJECT NO. 494 CO,'tTRACT I 1. SANITARY SET, -TER A.) Woodlands, Sunrise Hills. and Elementary School 280 Lin.ft. 10" Sanitary sewer, 0'-15' dp. in pl. @ $20.00/l.f. $ 5,600 220 Lin.ft. 10" Sanitary sewer, 15'-25' dp. in pl. @ $34.00/l.f. 7,480 560 Lin.ft. 8" Sanitary sewer, 0'-15' dp. in pl. @ $16.00/l.f. 8,960 1,100 Lin.ft. 8" Sanitary sewer, 15'--25' dp. in pl. @ $30.00/l.f. 33,000 10 Lin.ft. 3" Outside drop @ $120.00/I.f. 1,200 6 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 5,400 60Lin.ft. �.H depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/l.f. 3,600 2 Each 8i° x 4" wye branch @ $50.00/each 100 20 Lin.ft. 4" Riser pipe @ $20.00/l.f. 400 1 Each Connect to existing ?.H @ $500.00/each 500 500 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 5,000 2,160 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/l.f. 2,160 Total $ 73,400 +5% Contingencies 3,670 $ 77,070 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 19,2713 TOTAL ............................................ $ 96,340 2293e Page 12. 75 B.) Bridle Ridge 1,340 Lin.ft. 8" Sanitary sewer, 0'--15' dp. in pl. @ $16.00/1.f. $ 2,140 580 Lin.ft. 8" Sanitary sewer, 15'-25' dp. in pl. @ $30.00/1.f. 17,400 2 Lin.ft. 8" Outside drop @ $120.00/l.f. 240 6 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 5,400 30 Lin.ft. Z,1H depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/l.f. 1,800 3 Each 8" x 4" wye branch @ $50.00/each 150 20 Lin.ft. 4" Riser pipe @ $20.00/each 400 500 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe'@ $10.00/cu.yd. 5,000 1,920 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/l.f. 1,920 Connect to existing water main @ $500.00/each Total $ 34,450 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. +5% Contingencies 3,720 3,080 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/l.f. $ 36,170 3,080 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 9.040 TOTAL ............................................ $ 45,210 II. WATER MAIM 2,700 Lin.ft. 12" Water main in pl. @ $22.00/l.f. $ 59,400 150 Lin.ft. 6" Water main in pl. @ $14.00/l.f. 2,100 3 Each Hydrant @ $1,000.00/each 3,000 3 Each 12" Butterfly valve & box @ $750.00/each 2,250 1 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $350.00/each 350 3,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.00/lb. 3,000 3 Each Connect to existing water main @ $500.00/each 1,500 150 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,500 3,080 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/l.f. 3,080 Total $ 76,180 +5% Contingencies 3,810 $ 79,990 +251 Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 20,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 99,990 Page 13. 2293e AO III. SERVICES 250 Lin.ft. 410 Sanitary sewer service @ $8.00/11.f. $ 2,000 210 Lin.ft. 8" Water service @ $16.00/l.f. 3,360 115 Lin.ft. 6" Water service @ $14.00/l.f. 1,610 350 Lin.ft. :dater service @ $10.00/l.f. 3,500 2 Each 3" 'resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $500.00/each 1,000 Each 6" Resilient .vedge gate valve & box @ $400.GO/each 300 i Tach Wet tap 8" water seryl, to e-xisting 12" @ $1,500.00/each 1,500 5 Each 112" curb stow & box @ $100.00/each 500 5 Each 112" Corporation stop @ $80.00/each 400 1,160 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/1.f. 1,;50 Total $ 15,3.30 +5°o Contingencies 1'30 $ 16,620 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 4,150 TOTAL ............................................ $ 20,770 2293e rage 14. OI IV. STORM SEWER A.) Woodlands, Sunrise Hills, and Elementary: School 100 Lin.ft. 48" Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/l.f. $ 6,000 70 Lin.ft. 36" Storm sewer in pl. @ $50.00/l.f. 3,500 250 Lin.ft. 27" Storm sewer in pl. @ $40.00/l.f. 10,000 650 Lin.ft. 24" Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/l.f. 39,000 1,200 Lin.ft. 18" Storm sewer in p1. @ $60.00/l.f. 72,000 850 Lin.ft. 15" Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/l.f. 13,700 8 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,602.50/each 12,820 2 Each Std. CBMH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each 2,000 9 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 82100 1 Each 48" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $1,800.00/each 1,800 1 Each 18" RCF flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 800 2 Each 15" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $500.00/each 1,000 3 Each Connect to existing storm sewer @ $600.00/each 1,800 50 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $30.00/cu.yd. 4,000 500 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 5,000 3,120 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/l.f. 3,120 Total $189,640 +5% Contingencies 9490 $199,130 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 49,780 TOTAL .......................................... $248,910 Page 15. 2293e O� B.) Bridle Rid --e & Store Bridge 400 Lin.ft. 18" Storm sewer in p1. @ $26.00/l.f. $ 10,400 11310 Lin.ft. 15" Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/l.f. 28,820 4 Each Std. CB," w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each 4,000 4 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 3,600 3 Each Connect to existing storm sewer @ $500.00%each 1,500 1.00 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 1,710 Lin.ft. -r4echanical trench compaction @ $1..00/l.f. 1.71.0 Total $ `1,030 +5o Contingencies _ 2,550 $ 53,580 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 13,400 TOTAL ............................................ $ 66,980 V. STREET GRADING LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $3,000.00/L.S. $ 3,000 25,000 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $2.00/cu.yd. 50,000 8,000 Cu.yds. Subgrade excavation @ $3.00/cu.yd. 24,000 Total $ 77,000 +5% Contingencies 3,850 $ 80,850 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 20,210 TOTAL ............................................ $101,060 CONTRACT I I. SANITARY SEWER A. Woodlands, Sunrise Hills, & Elementary School $ 96,140 B. Bridle Ridge 45,210 II. WATER MAIN 99,990 III. SERVICES 20,770 IV. STORM SEWER A. Woodlands, Sunrise bills, & Elementary School 248,910 B. Bridle Ridge & Stone Bridge 66,980 V. STREET GRADING 101,060 TOTAL CONTRACT I ........................ $679,260 Page 15. 2293e A� CONTRACT II I. STREET SURFACING A.) Woodlands, Sunrise Hills, & Elementary School $ 50,400 7,000 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow (street) @ $7.20/cu.yd. 7 1,50 200 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow (concrete walk) @ $7.20/cu.yd, Class 5 aggregate base (street) @ $5.00/ton 0 49,500 9,900 Ton base (trail) @ $5.00/ton 5,500 1,100 Ton Class 5 aggregate 24,750 2,250 Ton Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton 16,800 1,400 Ton Bituminous binder course @ $12.00/ton 16,200 900 Ton Bituminous wear course (street) @ $ 18.00/ton Bituminous wear course (trail) @ $18.00/ton 5,400 300 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $160.00/ton 45800 280 Ton Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 2,800 1,500 Gal. � $5.00/l.f. 27,000 5,400 Lin.ft. B618 Concrete curb & gutter . 209250 13,500 Sq.ft. Concrete Sidewalk @ $1.50/sq.ft• 5,250 35 Each Adjust utility structures @ $150.00/each 3,000 1,500 Sq.yds. Sodding @ $2.00/sq.yd. 6.000 4.0 Acres Seeding @ $1,500.00/acre 8, r $278,540 Total 1� 3 930 +5% Contingencies $2929470 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 73,120 .......... $365,590 TOTAL.................................. Page 17. 2293e V II. STREET SURFACING A.) Bridle Ridge and Stone Bride 3,700 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $2.00/cu.yd. 3,800 Sq.yds. ?Sill bituminous surface @ $1.00/sq.yd. 400 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow (concrete walk) @ $7.20/ton 1,000 Ton Class 5 aggregate base %str.eet) @ $5.00/ton 2,000 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (trail) @ $5.00/ton 1,700 Ton Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton 750 Ton Bituminous binder course @ $12.00/ton 1,700 Ton Bituminous wear course (street) @ $18.00/ton 530 Ton Bituminous wear course (trail) @ $18.00/ton 270 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $160.00/ton 1,700 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 5,000 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/l.f. 24,500 Sq.ft. Concrete sidewalk @ $1.50/sq.ft. 30 Each Adjust utility structures @ $150.00/each 900 Sq.yds. Sodding @ $2.00/sq.yd. 4.0 Acres Seeding @ $1,500.00/acre Total +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL............................................ nn-- e— r r $ 7,400 3,0300 2,480 5,000 10,000 i8, 700 9,000 30,600 9,540 43,200 2,550 25,000 36,750 4,500 1,800 6,000 $216,720 10,840 $227,560 56.890 $284,450 I. STREET SURFACING A.) Woodlands', Sunrise Hills, & Elementary School $365,590 B.) Bridle Ridge & Stone Bridge 284,450 TOTAL CONTRACT II .......................... $650,040 Page 13. 2293e q�; APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WESCOTT ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 494 I. SANITARY SEWER A.) Woodlands, Sunrise Hills, and Elementary School Parcel Description SE_1/4z SECTION 14 Parcel 012-81 (Elementary School) Parcel 010-82 Parcel 020-82 Parcel 020-78 Sunrise Hills (Part of 011-81, 010-77) Woodlands (Part of 010-77, 010-78) B.) Bridle Rid?e Parcel Descri tion NW 1/4 AND NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-28 Parcel 010-27 Parcel 012-25 Parcel 011-25 Parcel 010-03 350 901.5 2,508.56 350 30.12 901.50 30.12 10,542 27,153 $ 73,506 Assessable Total Footage Rate/FF Assessment 446 $23.61 Rate/ 656 Front Assessable Center- Total Footage Footage line Ft. Assessment 157 862.06 662 $30.12 1) $ 19,939 260 260 30.12 79831 135 135 30.12 4,066 132 132 30.12 3,975 350 901.5 2,508.56 350 30.12 901.50 30.12 10,542 27,153 $ 73,506 Assessable Total Footage Rate/FF Assessment 446 $23.61 $ 10,529 656 23.61 15,486 328 23.61 7,744 328 23.61 7,744 157 23.61 3,707 1,915 $ 45,210 Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3 (1) Assessment Rate from "City of Eagan Fee Schedule" 2293e Page 19. 0 II. .CATER MAIN a.) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel Front Description Rate/FF Footage SE 1/4, SECTION 14 662 $20.55(1) Parcel 012-81 (Elementary School) 862.06 Parcel 010-82 1,622 260 Parcel 020-82 842 135 Sunrise Hills (Part of 011-81. 901.5 6.24 010--77) 350 Woodlands (Part of 010-77, 010-78) 901.5 Parcel 020-78 132 NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 1,985.25 Parcel 010-02 661.75 NW 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-28 467 Bridle Ridge (Part of 010-28, 011-25) 1,858.2 NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Bridle Ridge (Part of 010-03) 232 Stone Bridge (Part of 010-03) 1,507 TOTAL ........ Assessable Total Footage Rate/FF Assessment 662 $20.55(1) $ 13,604 260 6.24 1,622 135 6.24 842 350 6.24 2,184 901.5 6.24 5,625 132 6.24 824 1,805.25 $ 6.24 $ 11,264 661.75 6.24 4,129 467 $ 6.24 $ 2,914 1,858 6.95(2) 12,913 232 $ 6.95 $ 1,612 1,507 6.95 10,474 $ 68,007 (2) Assessment rate $6.24/FF per City of Eagan Fee Schedule increased $0.71 due to Neighborhood Park assessment being spread over Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge. ($6.24 + [410 x 6.24 r 3,597.21 = $6.95). Page 20. 2293e 97 b.) Trunk Area Water Main 10.9 $1,250 $ 13,625 Street 20% 19.5 Parcel 24,375 Area Credit Assessable Rate/ Total Description 1,250 14,500 (Ac.) (Acre) Area Acre Assessment SE 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 012-81 (School) 28.1 Pond 3.1 20 $3,170/ac.(1) $ 63,400 Street 20% Parcel 011-81 (Sunrise Hills) 6.3 Street 20% 5.0 1,250/ac. 6,250 Parcel 011-80 (Sunrise Hills) 21.4 Pond 2.1 15.4 1,250/ac. 19,250 Street 20 Parcel 012-80 (Sunrise Hills) 5.4 Pond 1.7 3.0 1,250 3,750 Street 20% (1) Parcel 020-82 2.9 1.9 1.0 1,250 1,250 (1) Parcel 010-82 2.0 1.0 1.0 1,250 1,250 Parcel 010-75 (Woodlands) 39.6 Pond 8.85 24.6 1,250 30,750 Street 20% Parcel 010-76 (Sunrise Hills) 1.6 Street 20% 1.3 1,2.50 1,625 Parcel 010-76 (Woodlands) 18.5 Street 20% 14.8 1,250 18,500 Parcel 010-77 (Sunrise Hills) 4.3 Street 20% 3.4 1,250 4,250 Parcel 010-77 (Woodlands) 12.5 Street 20% 10 1,250 12,500 Parcel 010-78 (Woodlands) 1.2 --- 1.2 1,250 1,500 (1) Parcel 020-78 1.9 0.9 1.0 1,250 1,250 NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 Parcel 010-02 NW 1/4, SECTION 24 60.0 Pond 9.5 40.4 $1,250 Street 20% 19.9 Pond 2.9 13.6 1,250 Street 20% Parcel 010-28 13.6 Parcel 010-28 (Bridle Ridge) 24.4 Parcel 010-27 (Bridle Ridge) 19.0 Parcel 011-25 (Bridle Ridge) 14.5 NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-03 (Bridle Ridge) 7.2 Parcel 010-03 (Stone Bridge) 47.0 2293e $ 50,500 17,000 $194,625 Street 20% 10.9 $1,250 $ 13,625 Street 20% 19.5 1,250 24,375 Street 20% 15.2 1,250 19,000 Street 20% 11.6 1,250 14,500 Street 20% Pond 0.5 Street 20% P4� 21. 5.8 $1,250 $ 7,250 37.2 1,250 46,500 TOTAL ................ $358,275 III. SERVICES Parcel Sanitary Total Description _Sewer Water Assessment SE 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 012-81 (Elementary School) --- $2218, 8" $ 2,218 Parcel 010-82 $ 525, 4" 1247, l," 1,772 Parcel 020-82 525, 4" 1247, 1`;" 1,772 Sunrise Hills (Part of 011-81, 010-77) --- 2218, 8" 2,218 Woodlands (Part of 010-77, 010-78) --- 1903, 6" 1,903 NE 1/49 SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 --- 1903, 6" 1,903 NW 1/4, SECTION 24 Parcel 010-28 --- 3596, 8" Wet tap 3,596 Bridle Ridge (012-25) 1579, 3-4" 3809, 3-11-," 5.388 TOTAL........................................ $20,770 2293e Page 22. IV. STORM SEWER A.) LATERAL a.) Woodlands Sunrise Hills, and Elementary School Parcel Front Assessable Total Description Footage Footage Rate/FF Assessment SE 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 012-81. (Elementary School) 862.06 662 $10.30(1) $ 6,819 Parcel 010-82 260 260 10.30 2,678 Parcel 020-82 135 135 10.30 1,391 Sunrise Hills (Part of 011-81, 010-77) 350 350 10.30 Woodlands (Part of 010-77, 010-78) 901.5 901.5 10.30 Parcel 020-78 132 (1) 132 10.30 NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 1,985.25 1,805.25 $10.30 Parcel 010-02 661.75 661.75 10.30 TOTAL................................ b.) Bridle Ridge & Stone Bridge Parcel Assessable Description Footage NW 1/4; SECTION 24 Bridle Ridge (Part of 010-28, 010•-27, 012-25, 011-25) 2158.2 Rate/FF 3,605 9,235 1,360 $ 18,592 6.816 $ 50,546 Total $17.19 $ 37,090 NE 1/4, SECTION 24 Bridle Ridge (Part of 010-03) 232 $14.03 $ 3,988 Stone Bridge (Part of 010-03) 1,507 14.03 25,902 3,897 $ 66,980 2293e Page 23. �6 B.) TRUNK AREA Parcel Area Assessable Rate/ Total Description (S.F.) Credit Area Sq.Ft. Assessment SE 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 012-81 (2) 914,750 Pond 56,630 686,500 $0.079 $ 54,234 Street 20% Parcel 011-81 (Sunrise NE 1/4r SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 (3) 1,028,020 Pond 230,870 637,720 $0.053 $ 33,799 Street 20% Parcel 010-02 317,990 Pond 17,420 240,460 0.053 _12,744 Street 20% `--� TOTAL ..................... $288,732 (2) Previously was Parcel 010-81 and was assessed for 7.1 acres (309,280 sq.ft.) as part of Project No. 433, Lex. Sq. 2nd Addn. Trunk. This proj- ect proposes to assess the remaining area. (3) Previously assessed for 29.2 acres (1,271,950 sq.ft.) as part of Project No. 433 Lex. Sq. 2nd Addn. Trunk. This project proposes to assess the ad- ditional area which benefits from this project while the remaining area will be assessed as part of future projects which it will benefit from. 2293e Page 24. l Hills) 274,430 Street 20% 219,540 0.053 11,636 Parcel 011-80 (Sunrise 932,180 Pond 91,480 672,560 0.053 35)646 Hills) Street 20% Parcel 012-80 (Sunrise 235,220 Pond 74,050 128,940 0.053 6,834 Hills) Street 200 Parcel 020-82 126,320 Large Lot 49,500 0.053 2,624 Parcel 010-82 87,120 Large Lot 33,000 0.053 1,749 Parcel 010-75 1,724,980 Pond 385,510 1,071,576 0.053 56,794 (Woodlands) Street 20% Parcel 010-76 (Sunrise Hills) 68,400 Street 20% 54,720 0.053 2,900 Parcel 010-76 (Woodlands) 807,160 Street 20% 645,730 0.053 34,224 Parcel 010-77 (Sunrise Hills) 188,385 Street 20% 150,710 0.053 7,988 Parcel 010-77 (Woodlands) 543,425 Street 20% 434,740 0.053 23,041 Parcel 010-78 (Woodlands) 52,270 --- 52,270 0.053 2,770 Parcel 020-78 82,764 Large Lot 33,000 0.053 1,749 NE 1/4r SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 (3) 1,028,020 Pond 230,870 637,720 $0.053 $ 33,799 Street 20% Parcel 010-02 317,990 Pond 17,420 240,460 0.053 _12,744 Street 20% `--� TOTAL ..................... $288,732 (2) Previously was Parcel 010-81 and was assessed for 7.1 acres (309,280 sq.ft.) as part of Project No. 433, Lex. Sq. 2nd Addn. Trunk. This proj- ect proposes to assess the remaining area. (3) Previously assessed for 29.2 acres (1,271,950 sq.ft.) as part of Project No. 433 Lex. Sq. 2nd Addn. Trunk. This project proposes to assess the ad- ditional area which benefits from this project while the remaining area will be assessed as part of future projects which it will benefit from. 2293e Page 24. l V. STREET A.) WOODLANDS, SUNRISE HILLS, & ELE-4ENTARY SCHOOL Parcel Total Front Assessable DescriDtion $ 48,445 Footage Footage SE 1/4, SECTION 14 4,184 20.28(6) 7,098 Parcel 012-81 (Elementary School) 862.06 662 Parcel 010-82 260 260 Parcel 020-82 135 135 Sunrise Hills (Part of 011--81, 010-77) 350 350 Woodlands (Part of 010-77, 010-78) 901.50 901.50 Parcel 020-78 132 132 NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-01 1,985.25 Parcel 010-02 661.75 TOTAL ........ 5,287.56 Rate/F.F. Total Street Trail Assessment $60.78(4) $12.40 $ 48,445 30.99(5) 8,057 30.99 4,184 20.28(6) 7,098 20.28 30.99 1,805 $20.28 661.75 20.28 18,282 4,091 $ 36,605 13,420 $140,182 (4) Assessment rate equals full calculated commercial/industrial rate ($46.45/F.F.) plus 75% of grading ($14.33/F.F.) (5) Assessment rate equals full calculated residential equivalent rate ($21.43/F.F.) plus 50% of grading ($9.56/F.F.) because parcel has direct driveway access to Wes- cott Road. (6) Assessment rate equals half calculated residential equivalent rate ($10.72/F.F.) plus 50% of grading ($9.56/F.F.) because future platted parcels will not have direct driveway access to Wescott Road. Page 25. 2293e q? B.) BRIDLE RIDGE AND STONE BRIDGE Parcel Front Description Footage NW 1/4, SECTION 24 Part of Parcel 010-28 467 Bridle Ridge (Part of 010-28, 010-27, 011-25) 2,158.2 Bridle Ridge (012-25) 375 NE 1/4. SECTION 24 Bridle Ridge (Part of 010-03) 232 Stone Bridge (Part of 010-03) 1,507 SE 1/4; SECTION 13 Parcel 030-78 200 LE14BKE 1ST ADDITION Assessable Rate/F.F. Total Footage Street Trail Assessment 467 $17.72(7) $ 8,275 1,783 17.72 31,595 375 35.44(8) 13,290 232 17.72 1,507 17.72 200 --- $12.40 4,111 26,704 2,480 Lot 1, Block 1 225 225 --- $12.40 $ 2,790 WEST PUBLISHING CO. 2ND ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 1,824 I.,825 --- $12.40 $ 22,530 TOTAL .................................................. $111,875 (7) Assessment rate equals 50% of residential equivalent rate as determined in the 1987 Fee Schedule because future platted parcels will not have direct driveway access to Wescott Road. (8) Assessment rate equals full residontiai equivalent rate as determined in the 19,37 Fee Schedule because the future platted parcel; will have direct driveway access to Wescott Road. 2293e Page 26. 9 rn N L O+ O• O1 .O n O. M C,: O .•• . O O O O M G V) IN N n N J 10 O ZO .O 00 co O+ [T1 w 91 •p P n M N •D d M Q• Vl d n +O O m m OJ d •O V1 N M N J w M •O O+ N N N J V m O C4 J .-+ ut V1 N O .•• O N N 0 w N F qm .d b M F +n r coN .-+ O N f- cof/J •-• O O O o r \ 1.1 yy d V\ O O% O C4 C' O+ O 0 O •C f� N w .-1 CO T M Vl O d - Cl fA 00 m y J +D N N N N S. 7 M +•-+ �1 N (+1 V1 y N U1 V} :Ir .-+ h T O CO .9 CYNm c0 O N 0 OD m M •D N M W O rn O• V) Ir gl a C4 .-+ M cry V1 r v 'f L a7 .r C•"1 N GO CA EJ N O M a, J j- N _�T O Cn C4 O, -7 T T .Y I- M 41 u N n °O C cA n n r n iA fGJ a •• •• •, '3 QI tiY •+ N V1 W M C4 GD W w •D "•1 M Go s/y N O m GO N N m M M •O O n a u ••+ n n .-. O O m m n .a .+ N h h ^ N O+ 0+ Vl M 4 d N r1 N r•1 M V1 N 2 h o � p o o p o c o o v+ +n o o � C Q O VI V\ N In Vl O O N 1`- Vl O h r ou N �' G a 7 N M +n M O M r r •D c0 !U"F AF C M U1 ,N U) W ^f N of F � � N J V1 C4 T J O+ .--1 C'4 J n co ►. w m •O LO N O+ O+ �O �? O d M N V1 J N N •-1 O CO u a — — w y •d aW a d a l• b 6• rn .L C+ M V1 r •L+ M Y w N r m pl b O h .7 O C4 M V O� PO •••1 N �7 to 4 V W _ 7 r O I H p M M H 4 0 in OD O n N .-� 1 •-+ 1 OO 1 W ++•+ N O •-• O O N O O O O 1 •C O O M{ 7 O O J C:, -v� v m H, 17, W .+ N N F m GO O •-' ••� O O r H O O F+ u N O H +u d F n� .: '" •Y r. e> v 1 1 v H eo o e oo v 1 u s. u O ml N O O •� O - O q W c O W +a -0 0 W •o 'O W O H O 1-+' O -« w .••� — N x O m . N to , C/l p., •.� (n a ••+ In M In .-+ ,.1: •-n '.04 O O O 4. OO ti W h O O e Ir O r+ W W M a) 6 O 1 C O I f 4. O c t ^ rn O u ..a y .+ .+ .-+ a J ql o rl �. w IL•-+ U7 •.mi u .+ .-�+ u .G+ y a _N .� w m U U u U 1'• N O 'O p O U rr U u .� u 'o �. r. .� •0 C .+ u [0 H tC C. m ►. W H C m O Co N 4 N H ••• N O ••1 O H a+ [n u F m ai m m m 7 W 1'n In F. .-1 1>L1 O ' a O H P. 94 rn N A.) GRADING APPENDIX C CALCULATED ASSESSMENT RATE Total Grading = $101,060 Assessable Footage = 5,287.56 Rate/F.F. _ $19.11 50% Rate/F.F. _ $9.56 (Single Family) 75% Rate/F.F. _ $14.33 (Public Facility) B.) STREET SURFACING a.) Residential Equivalent (32' Wide Street) 0.73 Ton Aggregate base Cl. 5, (6" thick) @ $5.00/ton 0.16 Ton Base course mixture, (111 thick) 2331 @ $11.00/ton 0.16 Ton Wear course mixture, (12" thick) 2341 @ $12.00/ton 0.0176 Ton Bituminous mat'l. for mixture @ $160.00/ton 0.086 Gals. Bituminous mat'l. for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 1 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 0.00069 Acre Restoration @ $1,500.00/acre TOTAL............................................... Page 28. Total +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin., & Bond Interest TOTAL............................................. C.) COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL EQUIVALENT RATE (52' Wide Street) 2.18 Ton Aggregate Base Cl. 5 (12" thick) @ $5.00/ton 0.65 Ton Base Course mixture (4" thick), 2331 @ $11.00/ton 0.25 Ton Wear course mixture (12" thick), 2341 @ $12.00/ton 0.0463 Ton Bituminous mat'l. for mixture @ $160.00/ton 0.132 Gals. Bituminous mat'1, for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 1.0 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 0.00115 Acre Restoration @ $1,500.00/acre Total +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL............................................... Page 28. 2293e $ 3.65 1.76 1.92 2.82 0.13 5.00 1.04 $16.32 0.82 $17.14 4.29 $21.43 Rate/F.F. $10.90 7.15 3.00 7.41 0.20 5.00 1.73 $35.39 1.77 $37.16 9.29 $46.45 V4 - SOUTH HALF S.E. 1/4 SEC. 14, T. 27, R. 23 ----" --- —r — --- --- i r 010-7,6 P I -- j 0_12_81 87 5-3 010 20-82 49 020 j `(010-77 POND CREDIT 010-82 �+ y�I 200_ ' , - - --ISN - -- ,� 'g" ESC®1; 1! fW D PROPOSED 811 PVC SANITARY SEWER - 11 877.5 X882.2 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE I I I I I I l 0 200' 400' IScale in Feet L--------------------- 010-01 ----------------- NORTH HALF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 23, T. 27, R. 23 "•'••"'°'••"°' LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK (RATE / CENTERLINE FOOT) WESCOTT ROAD SANITARY SEWER PROJECT NO. 494 EAGAN, MINNESOTA ;IP -19 874.0 882.0 JP -20 852.0 855.6 010-02 I — — �- --------t— BONESTR00. ROSENE. ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: MAR. 87 1 F��gComm. 4 413 ' NO' _4---------------------.. SOUTH HALF S.W. 1/4 SEC. 13, T. 27, R. 23 ------------------ I r+ f ! + I r f r , 17 F 0 �Djj FUTURE ' I , SANITARY =------ SEWER `--; PROPO81�D 8"PV( ---,SA'NITARY`—SE I v r J `\ 4010-27 / 1 1 � I 1 NORTH HALF N.W. 1/4 SEC. 24, T. 27, R. 23 ... some LATERAL ASSESSMENT (RATE / CENTERLINE FOOT) WESCOTT ROAD SANITARY SEWER PROJECT No. 494 EACAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIAT-aS. INC. Engineers & :architects St. Paul, Minnesota / 1 Comrn. � 1 LFF,t�. ia4. 2 i (L N I f 1 1 N I I 1 1 I I ' 1 J r 1 1 1 IO 200' /400'Scale in _Fool `--; PROPO81�D 8"PV( ---,SA'NITARY`—SE I v r J `\ 4010-27 / 1 1 � I 1 NORTH HALF N.W. 1/4 SEC. 24, T. 27, R. 23 ... some LATERAL ASSESSMENT (RATE / CENTERLINE FOOT) WESCOTT ROAD SANITARY SEWER PROJECT No. 494 EACAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIAT-aS. INC. Engineers & :architects St. Paul, Minnesota Comrn. 49x413 LFF,t�. ia4. 2 i SOUTH HALF S.E. 1/4 SEC. 13. T. 27. R. 23 —j-- — — — --------------- ------ i ;- I'VE5•T PUBLISHING cm I 050-713 QRSKEf ...._._. kNESCO T T V)-- ,� ;N\, 012-77 oe I g s 1 1� 883.0 I `� s s7.4EzInAn I; -------------------------------------------------i--- '/`I -��; "i� I I %� I i i j I \ f VF CIO -01 i ' w If PROPOSED 8 Pk- `� ,� , , - - - -, ; - T - - - 012-02 J f SANI�FARY SEW�R` _ PARK DGE 011-02 If 4 / ------' 1872.2 -- / \ F� sS ------J., � � `� 1385.4 / � /' o 200, 400', Scale In rs+al — — — — -- — ---- - _ 1:-----------------------------� NORTH HALF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 24• T. 27. R. 23 aasurua�ar... LATERAL ASSESSMENT (RATE / CENTERLINE FOOT) WESC®TT ROAD SANITARY SEWER PROJECT No. 494 EAGAN, MINMESOTA SCVESTR®®, R®SENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, WC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: MAR. 37 9 tg SOUTH HALF S.E. 1/4 SEC. 14, T. 27, R. 23 ------------------------- 7 F z''u AA - ----------- f1fVENTARY SeHOOL = 020-02 - 7�6 L 66 .4 020 '010-77 POND CREDIT'"010-62 7 200 ND !VV E'S C OY, T �Ok 1 112" 1 11P' ---------------- 6'1 PROPOSED 1211DIP WATER MAIN �--CONNECT TO Ex. 12" DIP 1 WATER MAIN - 0 400' Scale in Feet i--------------- 010-01 677.5 7-5 NnDTI-1 HAI F ------ -------- =t -------- POND CREDIT Jp- 19 874.0 882.0 N.E. 1/4 SEC. 23, T. 27, R. 23 ... LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK (RATE / FRONT FOOT) WESCOTT ROAD WATER MAIN PROJEcT No. 494 EAGAN, MINNESOTA -1p- ?Q 352 0 655.6 CONNECT TO Ex. 12 '' D I P WATER MAIN 010-02 /'j BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota FD 'e. M A R� "7 F g. No. 4 Comm. 4 9 13 020 -78 SOUTH HALF S.W. 1/4 SEC. 13, T. 27, R. 23 -A Y'1'LYy1 ;�,T'liPYl�Yi77ir T,'(ra$a'd4'Sdi�'eY iYfriilP'r+1iB"ra.l"C'61'C'6"4517Y3'�illri➢3'/. 811 j I I11 !HYD ANT,, I r' I •. Ex. 12 DIFF, ,'' ' ,.. ;--- I,, ---� Ga2—g5 WATER MA}W,-- `— RI I ,'010-27` `-_ 10 200' '400' Scale In Feet 'i _—___—_—_—_�_—�_—_y_—__—C�__—_—_—_—_..1�'----_—_—_—_—_—_---_—_—_—_—_— �--� NORTH HALF N.W. 1/4 SEC. 24, T. 27. R. 23 .6869.6 eea seaeeee LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK (RATE / FRONT FOOT) WESCOTT ROAD WATER MAIN PROJECT No. 494 EAGAN, h4INNESOTA SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: tAAR. 37FFFig. A Comm. 494.13No, r� �, II � c I I Y'1'LYy1 ;�,T'liPYl�Yi77ir T,'(ra$a'd4'Sdi�'eY iYfriilP'r+1iB"ra.l"C'61'C'6"4517Y3'�illri➢3'/. 811 j I I11 !HYD ANT,, I r' I •. Ex. 12 DIFF, ,'' ' ,.. ;--- I,, ---� Ga2—g5 WATER MA}W,-- `— RI I ,'010-27` `-_ 10 200' '400' Scale In Feet 'i _—___—_—_—_�_—�_—_y_—__—C�__—_—_—_—_..1�'----_—_—_—_—_—_---_—_—_—_—_— �--� NORTH HALF N.W. 1/4 SEC. 24, T. 27. R. 23 .6869.6 eea seaeeee LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK (RATE / FRONT FOOT) WESCOTT ROAD WATER MAIN PROJECT No. 494 EAGAN, h4INNESOTA SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: tAAR. 37FFFig. A Comm. 494.13No, SOUTH HALF S.E. 1 /4 SEC. 13, T. 27, R. 23 ; ;-------------- ;- --I--------- -� I WEST f'dlOL 1 rr'/Ai'1G U I 030-78 LL \'�'r 012-77 j \\�o j •\ I 61 �• I 'll 6'83.0 8874 �. --- Ex. 12"�DIP WATER MAIN � I c�'�ESC€�`TT DAD I { ----, ----;_ - — — — - --- --------------=— — _- j— — ----� iz .............. ��� 1:10_01 13 012-02 I� / � \� � I I � 1 1 i ♦\ C� 1 I BARK I -i----1 1 �' ,' "� `♦ .� t� \\ ♦�♦/ / /'.\ems /'• I - ----- \ 11 ♦ �' \ 011-02 i I �____; \872.2 4 ________, I / ------ i 885.4 / I 0 200' 400', 'V / SaOie In Fest ----------- — — ---------------------------i NORTH HALF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 24, T. 27, R. 23 ......°•°°°• LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK (RATE / FRONT FOOT) WESCOTT ROAD WATER MAIN PROJECT No. e494 EACAN, MINNESOTA _�___�,►'0/ SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDE-ER K & ASSOCIATES, ES, i)alC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: MAR. 8? j I Comm. 49493 FICA. %Q. J SOUTH HALF S.E. 1/4 SEC. 14, T. 27, R. 23 — ------ --- — — -- — ,— — — ---� — — I X010 -7"6 i Y � Q EA,1EAJ TA 6i f, ------ 89 4 mss/r �i 0-82 `.; POND CREDIT` �5 RCP `,'010-77 \ -73 127��� ---I +-----I -_ IRCP + 12 RCPT j ol0-82 1811 13E ,'' -� °—° ! j - --- RCP\ i RCP ;kYE ® a �C'ia�►D ,I II " � _ �Ex. 48" RCP. i STORM SEWER I I A I i i0 200' 400' Seale In Feel i ------------ -fljr ; so' I 24" RCP I8''RCP , ��/ 48 RCP POND CREDIT ldp-1a 877.5 874.0 882.0 1i -\82.2 /r --PROPOSED STORM SEWER 010-01 J � 852.0 5PQ 855.6 ------------------------ _-----------•----- NORTH HALF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 23, T. 27, R. 23 I Ex. 3011 RCP STORM SEWER) OD I U_ I I 010-02 I I I I i afj I { .................... LATERAL STORM SEWER EQUIVALENT ASSESSMENT (RATE / FRONT FOOT) WESCOT!" ROAD STORM SEINER EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERI UK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: MAR. 37 f Fa No. 7 Corvam. 49413 . 020 i -78 SOUTH HALF 3 T. 1/4 SEC. 1 S.W. 3, 27, R. 2 T-1 ,- - T - f , -_-- - ax• 1 !--- u I I� I II ;,' ; PNOPOSED ; .I �-, --- ' i Ex. 30 RCP �; I - -- STORM SE` EE--�=---- , - ;--------- SEWR ,1 FUTURE OA.2-?5 �! I FORCE MAIN cn 010-`28 I � III --- 1'010-27` /' --- ---! '-i- 10!1'25 i _ i 1 10 200' 400" Stale In Foot NORTH HALF N.W- 1/4 SEC. 24, T. 27, R. 23 ...... a..w..... LATERAL ASSESSMENT (RATE / FRONT FOOT) WESC®TT ROAD STORLI SEWER PROJECT Ho. 494 EAGAN, MINNESOTA SONESiROO, ROSENE, ANDEFILIK Sc ASSOCI✓°iTE'S,NIC. Engineers 8c Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Data: MAR. a-7? comm. 49413 F g. NO. $ Ji l I ! 1 �I 1— I I I EmU- ' I 1 !--- u I I� I II ;,' ; PNOPOSED ; .I �-, --- ' i Ex. 30 RCP �; I - -- STORM SE` EE--�=---- , - ;--------- SEWR ,1 FUTURE OA.2-?5 �! I FORCE MAIN cn 010-`28 I � III --- 1'010-27` /' --- ---! '-i- 10!1'25 i _ i 1 10 200' 400" Stale In Foot NORTH HALF N.W- 1/4 SEC. 24, T. 27, R. 23 ...... a..w..... LATERAL ASSESSMENT (RATE / FRONT FOOT) WESC®TT ROAD STORLI SEWER PROJECT Ho. 494 EAGAN, MINNESOTA SONESiROO, ROSENE, ANDEFILIK Sc ASSOCI✓°iTE'S,NIC. Engineers 8c Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Data: MAR. a-7? comm. 49413 F g. NO. $ SOUTH HALF S.E. 1/4 SEC. 13, T. 27, R. 23 — — —----.-------------------------- — — I I -I I I J EXISTING 1 5 u K IVI SEi WER m 115" RCP�� EXISTING f 030=78 STORM E148SEWER SEWER 15 RCP ------ "i 181. WESCOTT � ROAD ----------- ole -aa � LD GP -4 983.0 1 s$a.4 to _ r PROPOSEq--- �'� --- - STORM \� ` % i , ? / `� • _ , I/` 012-02 SEWER010-03 PARK Cz (u I� I NORTH HALF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 24, T. 27• R. 23 ................. LATERAL ASSESSMENT (RATE / FRONT FOOT) PROJECT' No. 494 i. ONES „`®49y liVvrrmlWEiNE, ANDERUK ASS11CBA11S, INC. Engineers & architects St. Poul, Minnesota f Date: -,AAA. 3 f EAGAN, HiNNESOTA ? Comm. 4rv493 rig. N 1 � ' I g�ii 011-02 I rr \ 872.6-�f ;185.4 1 _ < / 0 tYJ e �' 480, / SCOW in Feat — = = �=— --- — — — — — — -- 1 — ---------------------------J NORTH HALF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 24, T. 27• R. 23 ................. LATERAL ASSESSMENT (RATE / FRONT FOOT) PROJECT' No. 494 i. ONES „`®49y liVvrrmlWEiNE, ANDERUK ASS11CBA11S, INC. Engineers & architects St. Poul, Minnesota f Date: -,AAA. 3 f EAGAN, HiNNESOTA ? Comm. 4rv493 rig. N SOUTH H,',.' -F S.E- 1/4 SEC. 14. T. 27, R. 23 r---------- --- 0� Al 0 A jSaab! :A trD L A > OL 012-81 0, FOND CREDIT 0 BEGIN STREET 5'CONC. WALK B618 CONIC. C. 8' BIT. TRAIL 41 r 1360.4 IJ 020 �20 -62 -010 -77 0!0 u2 vV tSC OT, T., /P OA 0 i (N. SIDE)- a G. (52' F - F) S SIDE) 7.5 22 0400, == Scale In Taal' L-------------------------------------- - -------- NORTH -------NORTH HALF PUBLIC FACILITY�7;Yl'\/A!EfJT" 5S���SMENT (RATE / FRONT FOOT) RESIDENTIAL EQUIVALENT ASSESSMENT (RATE / FRONT FOOT) TRAIL ASSESSMENT (RATE / FRONT FOOT) POND CREDIT Q) 874.0 j LL 882.0. 010-02 852.0 it j A53.6 ....... *a ......... WESCOTT ROAD STREETS PROJECT No. 494 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, R05al-E, "NDEMUK ASSOMf'E-S, ME,. Engineers & Archit,,:!cts St. Paul, N,1inm,.s01b1 Date: MAR. Comm. 4041 Fiq. No. B618 CONIC C. 81 G.(N. SIDE) 38' BITUMINOUS MAT - --CONSTRUCT 5' CONIC. WALK (N. SIDE) OVERLAY Ex. BITUMINOUS ADD 141 BIT. TO SOUTH 5 B618 CONC. C. 81 G- 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL (S. SIDE) SOUTH HALF S.W. 1/4 SEC. 13, T. 27, R. 23 ................................. I I I --------� I , � , I ' 1 I i '1 '•�I O I1 1 t 1 _ �T r I 1 r r I 1 r -i J'- 010-28 I i 1 I i rr ---i - 1010-27` X01) l0 200, 11400, ---�---- ----`----i------cam..-------- --V, NORTH HALF N.W. 1/4 SEC. 24, T. 27, R. 23 ..0-6 ............ RESIDENTIAL EQUIVALENT ASSESSMENT (RATE / FRONT FOOT) WESCOTT ROAD STREETS PROJECT No. 494 EAGAN, MINNESOTA @ONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERUK Sc ASSOCIATES. INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota [Dalo-jMA7R�117 i Cam 6618 CONC C.8 G.(N. SIDE) CONSTR(ICT :38' BITUMINOUS MAT 5' CONC. WALK (N. SIDE) OVERLAY Ex. BITUMINOUS ADD 14' BIT TO SOUTH ac 8618 CONC. C. 81 G. R' RITHNAINntiS TR811 (S L,InFI SOU I H HALF _ S.E. 1/4 SEC. 13, T. 27, R. 23 012.77 . ril\ 030-73 �''al `\ F_�fd3C�11883.0 `U END STREET l c8104 ff VVI- SCO~� T ROAD ` 12 1010-78 ��Yi19YTiPE---� ---� i`-0'b-YY�QS4T+rfdL"abPbi i'R.VYIfCYYYYfiFp�Z'd9"�'CV`JYGYY�f'Stl-vVYf4`YS-YYT�ilY�l ,�f '� 010-01 I Itl 012-02 I� �01br 03 i '� '' �P `; \ • Y,' •i 011-02 < I ! r ------i '---- \\8722//-------- �` / r' J --------885.4— / i ��`�' ppp� Scat© fel i sst =----------------- — --=-z- ------------------------------� NORTH HALF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 24, T. 27, R. 23 ..... ............ RESIDENTIAL. EQUIVALENT ASSESSMENT (RATE / FRONT FOOT) —.,.._----®— TRAIL ASSESSMENT (RATE / FRONT FOOT) WESCOTT ROAD STREE`fs PROJECT No. 434 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 0NIESTRP®0. ROSEhv-E, ANDS RLIK ASSOCIA`rS, INC. � Engineers & Architects j St. Paul, i,flnnesota Date: MAR. 3 7 �I Comm. 404.3 i Fig. ;). ASSESSMENTS mawaTRUNK AREA WATER WESCOTT ROAD TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENTS PROJECT No. 494 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSEME, AADE UX & ASSOCIATES, M. Engineers & Ar.-hiteats St. Paul, Minnesota � Date: MAR. 87 Comm. 49413 �Ig. No. 1 3 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, PROJECT 432 C. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 432, Royal Oak Addition, Utilities --On March 17th, the City Council received the final assessment roll and scheduled the public hearing to be held for April 21st. However, the public hearing notice in the legal newspaper was not published in the time frame required by state statutes for final assessment hearings. Therefore, this hearing should be continued until May 5th, 1987. All notices being sent out to all affective property owners are properly referencing the continued hearing date of May 5th. Enclosed on page 11V is a copy of information pertaining to those assessments against this property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the Final Assessment Hearing for Project 432 (Royal Oaks Circle - Streets and Utilities). 1. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 432 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Royal Oak Circle FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: April 21, 1987 (Continued to May 5, 1987) IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES Area $11.44%F,F, $12.79/F;g, O Laterals $285.36//Uny it $295.23/Uniit' (1) C Service $2,771,` 68/Lot $1747.00/Lot E] Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM Area X Laterals $277.23/Unit $411.99/Unit FINAL F. R. SANITARY RATES RATES Area $18.91/F.F. $17.779/F.F. Laterals $301..91/Unit $256.99/Uni Service Lat. Benefit/Trunk STREETS Gravel Base $57.09/F.F. $44.48/F.F. XX Surfacing 53.82/Unit L4-1-94/Unit- Res. 41.94/UnitRes. Equiv. 1 ' NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 16 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0'/ TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $415,772.31 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: .ALril 16, 1985 (1) Service includes both sanitary sewer and water main. 85-15 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, PROJECT 462 D. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 462, Windtree 5th and 6th Additions, Streets and Utilities --On March 17th, the City Council received the final assessment roll and scheduled the public hearing to be held for April 21st. However, the _public hearing notice in the legal newspaper was not published in the time frame required by state statutes for final assessment hearings. Therefore, this hearing should be continued until May 5th, 1987. All notices being sent out to all affective property owners are properly referencing the continued hearing date of May 5th. Enclosed on page //L is a copy of information pertaining to those assessments against this property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the Final Assessment Hearing for Project 462 (Windtree 5th and 6th Additions, Streets and Utilities). ill FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARINC PROJECT NO: 462 - -- SUBDIVISION/AREA: Windtree 5th & 6th Additions 1987' April 21, 1987, Continued to May 5s FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: p ' IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. FINAL F. R. = Feasibility Report. F.R. RATES RATESFINAL SANITARY RATES S ATER ❑ Area -------- ------ • � 1 998!10 Area $1 928.871101 $� X Laterals Xj Laterals $1 ,695 $2.05 8 � 1 Service $739 �t 1 1.. 1�°C' C] Service � Lat.-Benefit/Trunk �� ❑� Lac. Benefit/Trunk STREETS �� STORM------- �83211ot '_1 Gravel Base � Area —� 72- •6_ 411ot $4 170110r Surfacinp� $ 3 062.32 0 X Laterals $1 , 910.54/lot12.511/ ❑ ❑ Res. Equiv. ` 26 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: NUMBER OF VEARS'ASSESSED: 5 ' 8.5°/° RATE OF INTEREST: =391 430.0 " TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: .307.647.08 F• CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 219 1986 (1) sanitary sewer and watermain• Service includes both Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen VACATION OF A PORTION OF CRESTRIDGE LANE E. Vacation of a Portion of Crestridge Lane --On March 17th, the Council received a petition to vacate a portion of Crestridge Lane adjacent to the proposed Pinecrest Addition and scheduled the formal public hearing to be held on April 21`st. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and s nt to all potentially affected agencies. Enclosed on page is a plan showing the excess right-of-way to be vacated. This has been reviewed by the Public Works Department and is being recommended for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close public hearing and approve the vacation of a portion of Crestridge Lane as described adjacent to the proposed Pinecrest Addition. //5 TRI -LAND CO. SURVEYING SERVICES 4655 NICOLS ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 Z— — I � u SCALE -1"-50' C VACATION EXHIBIT j8 12-08 30 \ O O O I W W to Z M Q to J co j Z I 30 I LL � O r-- 4.08 N C' OO' 02'W S 00 00' 02' E —11.02 "C0 '00 T, b It I herby certify that this survey,plan or report% was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Bradley 1' wenson, Mn. Rep. No. 15233 Registered Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. Date: 5/19/87 4 UL U) LEGAL DESRIPTION:w Uj I w SEE ATTACHED p EXIBIT A. 0 w D_ , U 30 I �g r-- 4.08 N C' OO' 02'W S 00 00' 02' E —11.02 "C0 '00 T, b It I herby certify that this survey,plan or report% was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Bradley 1' wenson, Mn. Rep. No. 15233 Registered Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. Date: 5/19/87 4 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING. PROJECT 459 F. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 459, Brittany 9th Addition --On March 17th, the City Council received the final assessment roll and scheduled the public hearing to be held for April 21st. However, the public hearing notice in the legal newspaper was not published in the time frame required by state statutes for final assessment hearings. Therefore, this hearing should be continued until May 5th, 1987. All notices being sent out to all affective property owners are properly referencing the continued hearing date of May 5th. Enclosed on page is a copy of information pertaining to those assessments against this property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the Final Assessment Hearing for Project 459 (Brittany 9th Addition, Streets and Utilities). FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 'I SUBDIVISION/AREA: Brittany 9th Addition FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: April 21, 1987 Continued to May 5, 1987 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. = Feasibility Report STREETS D FINAL F.R. MATER RATES RATES LAS Area $ 494.44 519.00 D Laterals 1,610.32 2,096.00 D Service 957.85 825.00 n Lat. Benefit/Trunk FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES Area 7 Laterals 2,513.34 $2,966.00 x Lateral Parcel 011-7 , $4,100.00 7 Service 71 Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM STREETS D Area F� 868.75 911.00. D Gravel Base © Laterals $1,192.58 779.00D Surfacing Res. Equiv. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 17 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 near RATE OF INTEREST: • 8.5% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: 1233.085.10 (F.R. $215.021) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 86-04 PUBLIC HEARING DATE:• November 19, 1985 (1) Services include both sewer and water. $5,838.32 $3,859.00 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One I- OLD BUSINESS LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEW/NSP SUB -STATION A. Landscape Plan Review for NSP Sub -Station, Lot 10, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park f3 --Recently action was taken to approve a sub -station requested by Northern States Power Company for construction on Lot 10, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3. As a condition of approval, there was a requirement that a landscape plan, once submitted, be reviewed by the City Council. For a copy of the Planning Department remarks and landscape plan, refer to pages 41. Attached on page 0' is a copy of a landscape plan for the Northern States Power Lone Oak sub -station. The Planning Department has requested additional pines and Amur maples in various indicated areas. This landscaping scheme is more consistent with the Dakota Electric sub -station by Dodd and Cliff Road. The landscaping required for this site as well as the Dodd Road site is substantially better than the one along Pilot Knob and the sub- station located on Cliff Road on the Eagan/Burnsville corporate line. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the landscape plan as submitted by Northern States Power for a sub- station on Lot 10, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3. SPECIAL NOTE: The attachments referred to above were not available for distribution with the packet. This information will be included with the Additional Information memo on Monday. //I Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BLACKHAWK PLAZA B. Conditional Use Permit to Allow Gas Pumps and Service Bays on Separate Lots at the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center --The APC held a public hearing on February 26 and considered an application submitted by the owner of the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center facility requesting a conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in an NB district and for the separation of pumps and service bays. The APC's recommendation is denial on the conditional use permit application. At the March 17 City Council meeting, a conditional use permit was considered to allow gas pumps and service bays on separate lots at the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center. There were several neighbors present at that meeting who raised questions regarding the status of landscaping and other issues pertaining to the center and, therefore, the item was continued until the April 7 City Council meeting. At the April 7 City Council meeting the City staff presented a letter from the developer's legal counsel, Mr. Peter Stalland, who is citing various court cases and precedents as to why the City of Eagan must grant the conditional use permit to allow the gas pumps independent of the service bays. Due to a lack of time to address the various court cases cited in Mr. Stalland's letter, and additional questions that were raised by neighbors at that meeting, the item was continued until the April 21 City Council meeting, allowing the City staff and neighbors to hold an informational meeting to further review the overall development plans for the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center. That meeting was held on Thursday, April 16, 1987. For a copy of a memo prepared by the City Planner that reviews items discussed at the informational meeting, refer to page For a copy of the informational packet that was prepared by the City Adminsitrator for the April 7 meeting, refer to pages 45 - 58 as enclosed with the April 7 City Council agenda information packet. Duplicated again f6r review is a copy of the landscape plan, site plan for Blackhawk Plaza and the proposed gas pump dispensers for the Tom Thumb Food Store. These drawings are duplicated from the April 7 packet and appear on pages _ZAQthrough /ZZ_ . After reviewing the development agreement, there is no specific language that states a service station with service bays and gas pumps will be located on Lot 5, however, it is the understanding of the City Council, City staff and the adjacent neighborhood that it was the intent of the developers to locate the service bays and fuel pump dispensers on Lot 5 when the preliminary plat for Blackhawk Plaza was approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit to allow gas pumps and service bays on separate lots at the Blackhawk Plaza Shopping Center as presented. //T MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE DATE: APRIL 17, 1987 SUBJECT: UPDATE BLACKHAWK PLAZA CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST It was requested by the Eagan City Council that a neighborhood meeting be scheduled for April 16, 1987, to review the Blackhawk Plaza development. Approximately 25 people attended this neighborhood meeting and the items discussed were:l) landscaping and grading of the site and 2) the gas pumps and how they would be affected by the new road right-of-way and alignment of Blackhawk Road. Mr. Sturm attended the meeting and is coordinating with staff the issues and concerns of the neighborhood. At the present time, these issues are being reviewed by the Planning and Engineering Department and a response will be prepared for the April 21, 1987 City Council meeting. R1 100 City Planner DCR/jeh ii9 C', AREA TO Or 7i< w # 10 I,lr4l-WAY PLANTING SCHEDULE IVY To PSE Mk ITEP NT 13P7C OF "IMIH4 -WAIL (10'-0" oL•) � CODE QTY. I COMMON NAME/LATIN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS A 1� r-FLTIS�OGGIDjFrtTAG.I`! CAL IRT B- iA� F�rl`iS?ISLE I.InPEn -TILIA G�gWTA'GRE pIRE CAL �p>a C A UI11uCA psrf Y TA _._ HT FOW1 .FAQ L _...:. - . E --FMA:• F H J- _ - MAwhI:P-ha-FncoR - E�h�Y_b�]gMwL7 NF✓�� C.oltn7Tol{IEER IiW�IA KE►,'�EY_, Al-{TNoI'1Y WA1 ErER' gP�� caG=� 1" t HT:_ - 1V�-- — P -G• L1p M a,,,,A�_���a.�_c�a.n��Y VIBut'f��l�l oP�13 MA �M FL I p.�triE�lou,U Yl1Li'1A__ -._-- �1? - 1,7_F_ETWt�IrL . �Z - V HIGH WOOD TIE RETAINING WALL- Y r t _3: ac u- !A zi :A Sizz:z t I ..Z- ijil :zi! C2 0 0 OW] Z ul U. 00 z, Tz.. CL. C2 0 0 OW] •(o" REl%r0tkLrV COW-Skr-TE S-LRW OVER TIINVICI MOTE UNVErGK0Ut40 TANKS WkVC 2*-(' 'alETNRNTION P"V buRy vEPT%A Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three AMENDMENT TO SIGN REGULATIONS OFF-SITE TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS C. Consider City Code Amendment to Disallow Off -Site Advertising Signs --For the past 15 months, the City Council has explored possible methods to reduce or consolidate off-site temporary advertising signs that provide information and direction for residential plats and developments throughout the community. The Developers Task Force has reviewed several different options for restricting and regulating the size and location of off-site temporary advertising/directional signs and presented their findings to the City Council at" a recent workshop session. At that special City Council workshop session, it was determined by the City Council that off-site temporary advertising signs should be disallowed and that developers be encouraged to utilize the media for direction and advertising and further, that on-site advertisement would be allowed according to present City Code regulations. The City Attorney's office was directed to prepare a City Code amendment to disallow off-siteemporary advertising signs of which a copy is enclosed on page The Developers Task Force has been notifed of the proposed action by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the City Code amendment to disallow off-site temporary advertising signs as directed for preparation by the City Attorney. 17,3 0 Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. A. Location of Advertising Signs. Advertising signs are permitted on property zoned Business or Industrial. No off site advertising/development signs shall be permitted. B. Location of Business Signs. Business signs are permitted on property zoned Business, Industrial, Agricultural, Public Facilities, R & D or PD only in conjunction with an approved Business, Industrial or Agricultural use. C. Location of Business Signs in Residential Areas. Business signs in Residentially zoned areas or areas of PD designation for residential use only under the following cases: 1. "For Sale" or "For Rent" signs, 4 feet x 4 feet or smaller, advertising the premises upon which such sign is located. 2. One (1) Temporary on site sign containing no more than 100 square feet with a ten (10) foot maximum height shall be permitted. 1z� Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FOUR TWO -DIRECTIONAL SIGNS DOMINIUM GROUP A. Special Permit (Dominium Group) for Four, 4' X 81, Two - Directional Signs to be Located Near the Intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Cliff Road; the Intersection of Thomas Lake and Cliff Roads; Lot 2, Block 1, Knob Hill Professional Park and the Intersection of Diffley Road and Thomas Lake Road --The Dominium Group, developers of Thomas Lake Apartment complex located on Thomas Lake Road, immediately south of Thomas Lake Elementary School, has made application for four (4) 4' X 8' two -directional signs to be located at 1) intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Cliff Road, 2) intersection of Thomas Lake and Cliff Road, 3) Lot 2, Block 1, Knob Hill Professional Park and 4) intersection of Diffley Road and Thomas Lake Road. The Planning Department informed a representative for Dominium Group at the time the application was made that the City Council was changing its ordinance regulations and would not be allowing off- site temporary advertising/directional signs throughout the community. It was also noted to the applicant that this ordinance amendment would be considered at a City Council meeting in the near future. Item C of Old Business does address the proposed ordinance amendment to disallow temporary advertising/directional signs for the purpose of advertising subdivisions and developments. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report found on pages JZ�, through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special permit for four (4) directional signs as presented by the Dominium Group. /z6 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: DOMINIUM MANAGEMENT SERVICE, INC. (THERESE MURPHY) LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 28, SW AND SE 1/41S OF SECTION 21 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY), AGRICULTURE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (82-4) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 21, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 15, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a special permit to allow four (4) two-way directional signs all of which will be 4' x 8' in dimension, allowing for a total of 32 square feet per side. PLANNER COMMENTS: At a March 31, 1987 meeting of the City Council, direction was given relative to the processing of "directional" sign applications and for the preparation of a sign code amendment that tightly regulates future placement of said signs. This application is forwarded to the City Council for consideration, however, because to date the pending code amendment has not been officially adopted. In absence of this code amendment, the Planning Department will continue to process sign applications pursuant to the duly adopted City of Eagan sign ordinance. Dominium Management Services, Incorporated is presently constructing Thomas Lake Point Apartments located on Thomas Lake Road, approximately equadistant between Diffley and Cliff Roads. The project was given final plat approval by the City Council on November 19, 1985 and consists of 216 units with occupancy expected to commence in July, 1988. The purpose for the directional signs is to direct potential occupants to ,the project area which is relatively secluded. The four directional signs will be located at the northeast quadrant of Thomas Lake and Cliff Roads, the northwest quadrant of Cliff and Pilot Knob Roads, the northwest quadrant of Pilot Knob and Diffley Roads, and directly across Thomas Lake Road as it intersects with Diffley. (Please refer to the enclosed exhibits for specific sign locations.) If approved, the four two -directional signs shall be subject to all applicable sign and City Code Ordinances. /7!4 SIGN LOCATIONS THOMAS LAKE POINTE * SIGN LOCATIONS PROJECT LOCATION �z% ra•i� c• { Id %F �'{"•rr I 11 •' t +1 J :r a ----------------- T /zy Qrj Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five WAIVER OF PLAT DUPLEX LOT SPLIT B. Waiver of Plat for Duplex Lot Split for Lot 6, Block 1, and Lot 3, Block 2, Rahn Ridge Addition --The Planning Department has received an application for a waiver of plat requesting the division of two (2) duplex lots located on Lot 6, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2 of Rahn Ridge First Addition. The waiver of plat is in order for consideration. Enclosed on pages through �� is a copy of the Planning Department report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat as presented by B.H. Grace Corporation. /30 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: B.H. GRACE CORPORATION LOCATION: LOT 6,.BLOCK 1 AND LOT 3, BLOCK 2, RAHN RIDGE ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-2 (DUPLEX) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 21, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 10, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a waiver of plat requesting the division of two duplex lots located on Lot 6, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2 of Rahn Ridge lst Addition. PLANNER COMMENTS: Lot 3, Block 2 is located west of Vienna Lane and abuts duplex lots to the north and south and is east of the single family subdivision of Vienna Woods. The separate utilities are sufficient to meet the needs of the subsequent individual lots. Lot 6, Block 1 is located north of Pin Oak Drive and lies east of the single family subdivision of Vienna Woods. Sufficient utilities exist to meet. the needs of the subsequent individual lots. If this waiver of plat is approved, all other applicable City Ordinances shall apply. 13f Hedlund Engineering Services 9201East &aamMng�+Freeway Bb"In9ton, Mivrsora 55420 Lead, Sorveyet$ Civil Engineers Land Planners Phone: 888-0289 AV �i�rr�e�or�s G'ert�f►c,te IAIF BOOK 91 PAGE e2 J013 NO. 87R-060 SURM FOR: B. H. Grace DESURI HD As. Parcel A That part of Lot 6, Block 1, RP_HN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County, }Minnesota, Lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said Lot 6 distant 50.36 feet west of the northeast corner thereof, to a point on the south line of said Lot 6 distant 49.91 feet west of the southeast corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. That part of Lot 6, Block 1, RAHN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Ilinnesota, lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said Lot 6 distant 50.36 feet west of the northeast corner thereof, to a point on the south line of said Lot 6 distant 19.91 feet west of the southeast corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. V h e,9ST I9zo.o 101..77 SjOyg I W I n ° O � b O� j I w(v EX671 N4 ry OPUT LEVEL 5 C 1 L II ia.L� GAR. r 1 -50 (Y) - - - 49.91 930 94.5 930.4 P/N OR DR/YE CERTIFICATE -0-10M I hereby certify that on 2 /17 /$7 I surveyed the properly described above and that P the above plot Is a correct representation of said survey. RECEIVED APR D 1 1987�~�-- Je r D. andgren, Licenie No. 14376 /3� Q) 34 i I W(o Z EJ(ror.ro� I SPU'r LEVEL SG 1 L II ia.L� GAR. r 1 -50 (Y) - - - 49.91 930 94.5 930.4 P/N OR DR/YE CERTIFICATE -0-10M I hereby certify that on 2 /17 /$7 I surveyed the properly described above and that P the above plot Is a correct representation of said survey. RECEIVED APR D 1 1987�~�-- Je r D. andgren, Licenie No. 14376 /3� Hedlund Engineering Services 9201 East Bloorr"gtanFreeway Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 LUN Surveyors Civil Engineers Land Planners Phone: 860-0209 64f I W#0 r I'S G'ertif�ersie s� BOOK 86 PAGE31 JOB NO. 87R -03Y SUOND FOR; B. H. Grace DESCAWD AS: PARCEL A: That part of Lot 3, Block 2, RAHN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota lying southerly of a line drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 2 distant 50.00 feet north of the southwest corner thereof, to a point on the east line of said Lot 2 distant 50.00 feet north of the southeast corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. PARCEL B: That part of Lot 3, Block 2, RAHN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying northerly of a line drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 2 distant 50.00 feet north of the southwest corner thereof, to a point on the east line of said Lot 2, distant 50.00 feet north of the southeast corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. O h I eas T I 1,.� 428.0 ISO.00 923-I 1 I 1 1 1e.11. Z � I L �� r• EXISTI6IG � 7 SPLIT-LEVEL A Io iI.S3 %40USE Ia J I E—• � CAR. Sc I, ae.�e d 1 91177.6 `l FAST �) I90.00 1 \ A911A I pRlVf: CA R. , U_ I %— l711571NV SPLIT-LEVEL 8 I$ (Z c 14 '� SC %.Qb I1 Iw �-- •. 1� �� � JS ..a 7 9:L.L 9`70 1-60.00 923.8 I eRsr ._ -r CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I hereby certify that an 2 / 3 /87 I surveyed the property described above and that the above plat Is a correct representation of sold survey. I�ECEfV�0 AV 0 i 1987 - 1 ,.-,- . J r D. L ndaren, License No. 14376 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six VARIANCE/EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARR #3 C. Variance for a 20' Setback at Lot 7 and 8, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3 --The City Planning Department has received an application submitted by 7 -8 -9 -Company, owner Dennis Briguet, for a variance that waives the 20' side setback for industrial areas in the northwest corner of Lots 7 and 8 of the Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3. For further information on the variance request, please refer to the ning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages � through 6F ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance for a 20' setback at Lots 7 and 8, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3. /311 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: 7 -8 -9 -COMPANY (DENNIS L. BRIGUET) LOCATION: 837 APOLLO ROAD EXISTING ZONING: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 21, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 10, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a variance that waives the 20' side setback for industrial areas in the northwest corner of Lots 7 and 8 of the Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3. PLANNER COMMENTS: The applicant's site is bordered on the north by railroad trackage owned by Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Pacific and on the west by Lot 6, Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3. The applicant seeks setback variances for the construction of a building such that it abutts the westerly lot line of Lot 7 and the northerly lot line of Lots 7 and 8 (the southerly line of the railroad easement). The applicant argues that this variance is essential to facilitate the movement of tractor/trailers on the property. If this variance is approved, all other applicable City Ordinances shall apply. iii ���� •Y ..I Ilnr •I r•. .r In • a51NONOMIC 11EA111NO, . ca UT cn T1>r, �! +� Y°�•I 6 i{� QUA �...., �j Co rn 2 • _ur1'-ipl'li^ Yrl • � Y.I. ,rn .I.r l'rr .Y •.Y• r•• • _' - r.•r i I ) . � •r .4• '� � �•I'_'L' F. n� i :�``I j�yY 1 }i S ,1g1f�,_r.��°�• I tdY91 71 i• � 7' CID JA a 1"rt ;t 1 r i. I �• 1 �Y•t +r Tlrr • r� ' e \ ir ' MO•Is 61-g 1711 QO 1... ' --� is ' � � • r' t 1 Gplr Ilry •1 x IN d I.. •1 w J Lr. I/ ! "n w �.,1 -: ' K� ' 1� t.w».-YY,.r, 1 r • I . . I 1 : '.i r"r`r � I' ( ,,�/f��� i f .I'. '/ �S as _S, IE A hl jy1•�, F •a,i...yY� �� .1F NL -.r. x-. �� f G xl It � Imo/ •li'..^.n.. •M 1' a ' .n° yli,\\ �� '�JI� e 1 — ir•I 4,...l ... F. ur rl Iw. Y •! S :: i ••� , _ ' �Lo` Yr yam VI F L 4 y�La � • • A : �nYL y 134 , v L; gives- 403. U -S! wi 1*4� i�4;. I � i , : , - , - , .; .. mop IS Us 1, �Y ilk. V. :k'. Cluj, Won. zvcl� 144 -ti " 'i, �, !_�" P; 1 1, k4 4. 1 A,, Ag 0. 1 nj OL "C. � ti PSI YL I:11" 6A9 17� [41. .............. .............. OWTV ism, N je J�Jr�, Lint No. ' Ii il list! w M A 45 SO, v Ik MUNI WHAT OM Sv= 44. , j7q", . . . . . . . . . . . . . im ':fir' ,Iv aor W 5! 4 Ott di" '.1 .1.4 1 - - , ': ;v call xxv .1 AS ml . 'N b loan was wingly"! ir i" :,00 WOMEN" JV ;V� 40' - Ing w MAI t AMMON Pf fgjpx Tq- 1v T-2 4 "w;s, 1; Tr IF i !j.:v Ilk' k" O" i nit Ap, "P PO A Wyk iT, ail iii 7A I i Von"! MAI INS A A PORT [:AGAN, M1 ...... ..... ............ q, Hk J 0 n ;I . m I I I o " J1 t lour T -T I M1 I I In I I f N I II IL t@ jC 0 I q I II b I ;I ! � I I• �• I I I� I I� Iii � 1 N � mr•F I I Ivlf � I II 1 N . 0 --I- �I a. T. I- p I I I I IL • L f 4 I�I..i I 1Le� II r ! I V. �I I /3 ? 11 r II t III s III l I I I n e I I I I I I I I y P T -T I M1 I I In I I f N I II IL t@ jC 0 I q I II b I ;I ! � I I• I I I C.T. ..{ II I JON I I IIII mr•F I I Ivlf � I II lil I II� (IIII �Fa i II --I- �I a. T. I- p I I I I IL • L f 4 I�I..i I 1Le� II r ! I V. �I I /3 ? 11 r } II t III s III l ,I z III � III � b I II. •II c II 11 IF•. 1 ' II I f N I II IL t@ jC A tt•, t } Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven VARIANCE/DIANE AND GERRY GROTH D. Variance for a 10' Rear Setback for Lot 5, Block 1, Harvey Addition --An application was received by the Planning Department for a variance which would allow a 10' deviation from the applicant's property line for a single family residential unit located on Lot 5, Block 1, Harvey Addition. For additional information on the variance request, refer to pages 4f16 through ZY3. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance request as presented for a 10' rear setback for Diane and Jerry Groth. AJ CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: JERRY AND DIANE GROTH LOCATION: LOT 5, BLOCK 1, HARVEY ADDITION (642 RITA COURT) EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 21, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 10, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a variance which would allow a 10' deviation from the applicants' property line for a single family residential unit located on Lot 5, Block 1, Harvey Addition. PLANNER COMMENTS: The applicant wishes to construct a 30' wide by 26' deep garage in the back portion of their single family lot. The construction of this facility without the 10' variance would result in the elimination of several mature trees and related vegetation. The applicant argues that adjacent zoning will eventually permit high density residential construction and a deviation of 10' is insignificant for this type of development. If this variance is approved, all other applicable City Ordinances shall apply. �� Vr y POO Or• x '� '• ' t t • � .+ 1, �,� P" T LOT 60 � v • y d Poll F" 7 4 . )010P �► .. qq i A f' f Wooded ' OU Applicants Lot La5d Not ODeveloped /Go. 16 ' l , _ STREET � DRIVEWAY n • EXHIBIT T cib n a (A) n • A 1Z CC - + EXHIBIT Z (B) •a Asp Birch 0 Oak OMape 1 Evergreen r 0Oak 3zAsh ©Ash a vergreen (Apple OEvergreen ergree evergreen OAppie I. Scale I/I6 Inch = I.48 Feet 2. Exhibit (A) Existing House 3. Exhibit (B) Proposed Garage 4. O. Assorted Trees 25 ft. Tall Or Taller /�Z View From Street Looking East Toward The Back—Yard. Area In Picture On North Side Of House Will Be Drive— way To New Garage. View From North Side Of House Looking East To Where The New Garage Will Be Built. The Evergreens You See Will Have To Be Removed For The New Garage, But The Oak Tree Will Remain Do To This Variance. /¢3 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight CONDITIONAL_ USE PERMIT OUTSIDE STORAGE AUTO BODY SHOP IN THE BARTON MC GRAY ADDITION E. Conditional Use Permit to Allow Outside Storage for an Auto Body Shop on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at the March 26, 1987 meeting to consider an application submitted by Daniel Sjolseth, representing Superior Collision for a conditional use permit to allow a motor vehicle repair and limited outdoor storage in a general business district. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval with a revised condition that all cars in the storage area shall be covered. For additional information on the item, please refer to the P lanni and Engineering Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages through 4. For a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission action on this item, refer to those minutes, a copy is enclosed on pages/SO415/. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit in the name of Daniel Sjolseth, representing Superior Collision for a motor vehicle repair and limited outdoor storage in a general business district at Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: DANIEL SJOLSETH LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BARTON MCGRAY ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 26, 1987, DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 12, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Daniel Sjolseth of Superior Collision requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow motor vehicle repair and limited outdoor storage in a GB (General Business) district. The site, Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition is located south of the Cedar Avenue/ Hwy. .13 interchange. Access is from Cedar View Road on the south side of this 1 -acre lot. Sherwin Williams abutts to the east and the U -Haul facility is to the south. COMMENTS: The applicant currently operates this business at 1971 Seneca Road. Thos new 10,000 sq. ft. facility will be made deco- rative block and have approximately 23% building coverage (35% is permitted). Parking stalls for 32 cars have been provided, 10 for guests and 22 contained within the fenced storage area. Code does not give a specific number required for the use. The fence should be opaque, either wood or "slated" chain link in order to not draw attention to the storage area. The applicant proposes to cover the cars with heavy body damage until they are repaired or painted. This will help eliminate the typical repair shop unsightliness. The concrete block trash enclo- sure will be connected to the building where parking stall 6 was proposed. The landscaping will be similar to other new projects along Cedar View Road. The rear yard outside the fence will be planted with native grasses and aspens at close proximity to match the existing conditions to the northeast. This type of planting will provide a more dense natural "screening than if pines were planted at a 12' to 15' spacing. /0 UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and watermain services of sufficient size, capacity, and depth are available and have been stubbed to this lot from Cedarview Drive. There is an existing 9" sanitary sewer line on Cedarview Drive and a service has been provided from this line to the lot along the south property line. A 6" watermain stub has been provided to the south property line off the existing 12" watermain on Cedarview Drive. The City will review the size of the watermain during the building permit review process. There are two existing hydrants along the south end of the site that should adequately serve the area for fire protection. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The lot is currently vacant and it contains a dense grass cover with a few small trees. The terrain is fairly flat with a slight slope to the northwest. Cedarview Drive is along the south side of the lot. The street drains to the east and then to the northeast to a pair of catch basins 400 feet from the lot. The catch basins drain through an existing 15" storm sewer line that outlets into the ditch along the south side of Highway 13. The ditch along Highway 13 currently receives the runoff from this lot and the ditch serves as an adequate facility to handle the runoff in the area, Staff recommends that the drainage patterns that currently exist at the site be the same after the site develops. All internal drainage shall be conveyed by storm sewer into the ditch that is along the south side of Highway 13. Staff is recommending that the ditch along Highway 13 be used to handle the runoff from this development rather than using the existing storm sewer line that drains northerly along the west property line of this development. The existing storm sewer line follows the alignment of Old Cedar Avenue and the line serves the Cedar Grove Numbers 1 and 2 developments. The existing storm sewer line is currently overloaded and staff recommends that this development should not connect to this line. The District 9 Hydraulics Engineer for MnDot has been contacted regarding the discharge of storm water runoff into the Highway 13 ditch. MnDot says that the ditch was designed to handle the runoff from the commercial developments along Cedarview Drive. However, MnDot will need to review the drainage plan before final approval is granted. STREETS/DRIVEWAYS/ACCESS: Access to the lot is from Cedarview Drive, an existing bituminous street with concrete curb and gutter. The only users of Cedarview Drive in this area will be the vehicles going to this lot or the U Haul store to the south of this lot. Cedarview Drive connects to Old Cedar Avenue on the west side of this lot and Old Cedar Avenue in this area is a dead end street due to the reconstrcution of the Cedar Avenue and Highway 13 interchange. City standards require that the entire proposed parking lot shall be blacktopped and concrete curb and gutter shall be installed around the outside edge of the parking 1 . 1j/ EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Sufficient right-of-way has been previously dedicated to accommodate the existing streets that surround the property on the south, west and northwest sides. Appropriate drainage and utility easements shall be acquired and or dedicated to accommodate the storm water drainage facilities that will be required to serve this property when it develops. A preliminary layout plan should be submitted to MnDot as soon as possible to allow them to review the grading, drainage and erosion control provisions. A MnDot permit will be required if any work is done in the highway right-of-way or if the storm sewer system outlets into MnDot's ditch along Highway 13. ASSESSMENTS: The property was previously assessed at the C/I rate for water area, storm sewer trunk and sanitary sewer trunk. There are no pending or proposed assessments. CONDITIONS FOR SJOLSETH C.U.P. - 1. The following items shall be approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit: a. Internal storm sewer. b. Approval by MnDot for storm water discharge into highway right-of-way. c. Appropriate utility easements. d. Black top parking lot with concrete curb and gutter. e. 30 foot wide entrance, -face to face. 2. The fence shall be opaque and a natural color. 3. The revised landscape plan will be submitted with the building permit application. This plan shall be installed with the initial building construction. ' 4. The cars with heavy body damage shall be covered until repaired. 5. There shall be no parts storage outside the building. /�7 N 00,X A q.. I.L. LLJi 3 e S. T 0 + 0 A MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING - EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA MARCH 26, 1987 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Thursday, March 26, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Hall, Members Gustafson, Voracek, Harrison, McCrea and Krisnik. Absent were Members Wilkins and Trygg. Also present were City Planner Dale Runkle, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch and Assistant City Attorney David Keller. AGENDA Pursuant to the suggestion of City Planner Dale Runkle, Voracek moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the agenda with the addition of discussion for the April Advisory Planning Commission Agenda to allow for two meetings. All voted yes. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DANIEL SJOLSETH LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BARTON McGRAY ADDITION The first public hearing convened by Chairman Hall was upon the request for a conditional use permit to allow outside storage for an auto body shop on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray A3dition, located along Cedarvale Blvd. at the Cedar Ave. and Highway #13 interchange in the north half of Section 19. Mr. Runkle introduced the application, indicating that the applicant had agreed to cover heavily damaged automobiles. The applicant was present to respond to questions. There was no one from the public. It was indicated that the outside storage would be visible to cars on the exit ramp from north Cedar Avenue going to North Highway #13. There was discussion with regard to which cars would be covered and what was meant by heavily damaged. The applicant indicated that any body work needed in excess of $1,000.00 would be considered major body work and the vehicle would be covered. It was pointed out by members that the Cedarvale location represent3d an entrance to the City of Eagan, which may not be very sightly with outside storage of damaged vehicles. Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the application, based upon the negative aesthetic impact on this entrance to the City. Harrison and Voracek voted yea; Gustafson, Krisnik and Hall voted no. The motion died. APC Minutes March 26, 1987 Gustafson moved and Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. The following items shall be approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit: a. Internal storm sewer. b. Approval by MnDOT for storm.water discharge into highway right-of-way. C. Appropriate utility easements. d. Black top parking lot with concrete curb and gutter. e. 30 foot wide entrance, face to face. 2. The fence shall be opaque and a natural color. 3. The revised landscape plan will be submitted with the building permit application. This plan shall be installed with the initial building construction. 4. All cars shall be covered until repaired. 5. There shall be no parts storage outside the building. Gustafson, Krisnik and Hall voted aye; Harrison and Voracek voted no. The applicant was advised to work with staff regarding the spacing of any future pylon signs, if desired. BRITTANY 10TH ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall convened the second public hearing of the evening in regard to the applications of Brittany Estates, Inc. for rezoning of 17.5 acres from A.(Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a preliminary plat consisting of 31 lots located along Covington Lane, just east of Beacon Hill Road in the northeast quarter of Section 33. City Planner Runkle described the proposal, including its location, the D -I Comp Guide designation, and the plans to extend Sherwood Way and Covington Lane to allow traffic to be looped on these two streets. Substantial grading would be necessary to connect to Covington Lane and a neighborhood meeting was held in which the major concerns were the street connection and potential drainage problems. Mr. Runkle advised that a traffic study had been done, indicating that about 300 additional trips would be created on Covington Lane, representing a 6% increase in the total number of trips. /-57 2 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR EAGAN WOODHAVEN ADDITION F. Rezoning of 4.58 Acres to R-4 and a Preliminary Plat for 64 Units for Woodhaven Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at the March 26, 1987 meeting, to consider the rezoning of 5 acres from A to R-4 and a preliminary plat entitled Eagan Woodhaven Addition consisting of 64 rental apartment units. The site proposed for development was recently used by the City as a dog pound. The APC is recommending approval. Enclosed on pages /6J through .4w- is a copy of the Planning and Engineering Department report. There is a recommendation by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission which is enclosed on page L75 -- Also enclosed on pages -/ through is a copy of the APC minutes from the March 26 m eting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R-4 and a preliminary plat entitled Eagan Woodhaven Addition as presented. /S7--- CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR EAGAN WOODHAVEN ADDITION. APPLICANT: EAGAN WOODHAVEN PARTNERSHIP (D. H. GUSTAFSON) LOCATION: NW4 SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 26 MARCH 1987 DATE OF REPORT: 17 MARCH 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING APPLICATION: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of 5 Agricultural acres to an R-4 (multiple) district and Preliminary Plat for the Eagan Woodhaven Addition. This plat consists of 64 rental apartment units on the old dog pound site along Lexington Ave. south of the Carriage Green Apartments. To' the north and west are Lexington Place Additions and O'Leary Park i-- on the other side of Lexington Ave. The January 1987 Land Use Map designates this area D -IV multiple, 12 plus units/acre. This plat with 12.8 units/acres is consistant with that plan. SITE PLAN: These rental units are very similar to the Forest Ridge Apartments along Duckwood Drive and Denmark Avenue.. Of the 64 units, 48 will have one bedroom and the remaining 16 will be efficiencies. All have covered individual garages with automatic openers. 48 units will have garages directly attached to the apartment. The others are approximately 75 feet from the apartment unit. One access from Lexington Ave. will serve the four 16. unit buildings That drive will be lined up with the one proposed for O'Leary Lake Park on the west side of Lexington Ave. These walkout type buildings match the existing topogrophy quite well. It generally falls to all sides from a high point near the center 'of the site. The southeastern 'area is heavily wooded and provides a nice buffer to the Lexington Square Additions. The proposed .Landscape flan emphasizes the use of native plant material and exceeds all City Standards. The design goal was to re-create the natural conditions thru mass plantings and by using a common plant species association. The building will have brick on the bottom and rough cedar on the top. They will be,approx. half as long as the Forest Ridge buildings. Code requires oneparking stall enclosed and an addition- al exterior space in R-4 districts - this has been provided. This plan differs from the Forest Ridge Project in that the exterior stalls are not in front of the garages. This eliminates 'snowbirds' in the plowing areas, the potential parking in front of another tennants. garage and confusion for users with two cars. In order to provide for safe backing out of the garage movement, an additional 6 ft was added -to the drive lane width. W UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth is readily available to serve this development through an existing 8" sanitary sewer line. The line was installed through the Lexington Place 1st Addition to the south property line of the proposed Eagan Woodhaven development. The developer proposes to serve the four sixteen -unit apartment buildings with an 8" sanitary sewer and 6" sanitary sewer service lines to•each building. Water service to this development is readily available through the existing 18" water main located along the west side of Lexington Avenue. A 4" water main is also available on the east side of this development in the Lexington Place 2nd Addition and a 6" water main is available near the northeast corner of the development in the Stuarts lst Addition. All three of these existing water mains shall be connected by this development to provide an improved water distribution system to this development and the surrounding developments. The additional water main that is required to provide the connections to the existing 4" water main to the east and to the existing 6" water main to the northeast is approximately 500 ft. The additional water main will improve -the water pressure and the fire protection capabilities for the water main system that serves this multiple residential area. GRADING/ DRAINAGE: This proposed development is located on the top of a hill with drainage to all sides. The elevation differential from the top of the hill to Pond DP -18 is about 40 ft., and this slope is along the southeast corner of the development. The grade of this slope is approximately 3:1. This slope is wooded. and contains a dense grass cover that prevents erosion. The north half of the development currently drains to the north across the Carriage Green Apartment Complex in the Stuarts 1st Addition. The elevation differential from the top of the hill to the north property line is about 15 ft. This gentle slope also contains a dense grass cover°that prevents erosion. The proposed grading plan will match the existing grades on the site as much as possible. The maximum cut will be about 10 ft. at the top of the hill with the grades matching at the rear portions of the proposed buildings. Therefore, the majority of the grading work will be at the top of the hill and the side slopes will be preserved. Approximately the north 70 ft. of the development will drain to the north to the Carriage Green Apartment Complex. This 70 ft. strip will include the rear portions of the two north buildings plus the grass and landscaped areas along the north property line. In order to limit the runoff of eroded materials to the abutting property to the north, the developer should protect as much of the existing dense grass cover as possible. In the southeast corner of the development, the existing grass cover and trees should be protected as much as possible to keep this 3:1 slope from eroding into Pond DP -18. Iq The center portion of this development which includes the parking lots and the fronts of the buildings will drain to the proposed catch basins and storm sewer line that will discharge to an existing 15" storm sewer facility. The existing 15" storm sewer facility serves as the outlet for O'Leary Lake and empties into Pond DP -18. The storm water runoff that will be generated from this development can be handled by the existing 15" facility and Pond DP -18. Pond DP -18 has a gravity storm sewer outlet that carries the water north to Pond DP -10. A culvert shall be required under the driveway to carry the storm water runoff north along the east side of Lexington Avenue, a two- lane rural section roadway. This development will not substantially increase the quantity of runoff that currently drains to the ditch. The culvert and the ditch system will be replaced when Lexington Avenue is upgraded to a four -lane urban section roadway with storm sewer. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this proposed development is readily available from Lexington Avenue. The Dakota County Highway Department maintains jurisdiction over Lexington Avenue and they propose to upgrade it to a four -lane minor arterial collector street with left turn lanes in 1988 or 1989. The County Highway Department will allow accesses onto Lexington Avenue every one-eighth of a mile or every 660 ft. Therefore, only one access will be allowed in between Town Centre Drive/Golfview Drive and Duckwood Trail. The location of the new access should be equal distance between the two above mentioned intersections. The location that the developer proposes for the access onto Lexington Avenue is at the correct location for being equal distance from the intersections to the north and south. The City's Park Department is preparing a layout for the O'Leary Lake Park improvements. The park will be on the west side of Lexington Avenue and north of O'Leary Lake. The Park Department is proposing to construct a new driveway to serve the park that will connect to Lexington Avenue at the same location of the driveway that will serve this development. The proposed access point onto Lexington Avenue is near the high point on Lexington Avenue. The sight distance and visibility is good to the south and fair to the north at the proposed access point. When Lexington Avenue is upgraded, then the sight distances will be improved to 55 M.P.H. design standards. This development proposes to construct a 30 ft. wide street opening onto Lexington Avenue that will serve the parking lots and driveways for the four apartment buildings. The street grades and circulation patterns appear to meet the City's standards. TRAILWAYS: Because of the designation of Lexington Avenue as a minor arterial roadway, City policy will require a trailway along both sides of Lexington Avenue. The trailway portion adjacent the westerly border of this property will be the responsibility of this development. Because the actual installation of this trailway will not be until 1988 or 1.989, staff recommends this development prepay for the trailway installation. /�8_ PERMITS: This development will be responsible for obtaining the following permits prior to final plat approval: 1) MPCA sewer extension permit. 2) Mn. Dept. of Health water main extension permit. 3) Dakota County Hwy. access and work within County right-of- way permit. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Staff recommends this development dedicate a 60 ft. half right-of-way for Lexington Avenue. Also, because of the potential grading required to rebuild Lexington Avenue, staff recommends this development provide a 20' slope easement adjacent the westerly boundary of this proposed development. The ponding easement for Pond DP -18, in the southeast corner of the development, shall be dedicated to incorporate the maximum storage volume necessary to handle a 100 -year rainfall event. A 20 ft. utility easement shall be dedicated over the proposed 8" sanitary sewer line. Also, a 20 ft. utility easement shall be dedicated over the proposed 6" water mains up to and including all the hydrants but not including the service lines to the buildings. A 30 ft. wide combined utility easement is required when the proposed water main and sanitary sewer lines are parallel and 10 ft. apart. A maintenance agreement shall be executed to cover the common use of the proposed driveways that will serve the four different apartment buildings. Since the potential exists for four possible ownerships, the proper easements for ingress and egress shall be dedicated prior to final plat approval. ASSESSMENTS: There are no pending assessments against the proposed preliminary plat parcel. The following assessments were levied: VRMTV.rrP $ 58 387 58 58 387 DESCRIPTION USAGE Sanitary Sewer Trunk S.F. Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit S.F. Water Lateral Benefit S.F. Water Area S.F. Storm Sewer Trunk (Large Lot) S.F. The following assessments are proposed: Project # Description Usage 58 Water Lateral Benefit Upgrade 58 Water Lateral Benefit Additional P5;0 Multi Multi Rate Quantity Amount $8.08/F.F. 200 F.F. $1,616 20.55/F.F. 130 F.F. 2,672 157 387 Storm Sewer Trunk Multi .067/S.F. 121,130 S.F. 8,116 Additional Area 387 Storm Sewer Trunk Multi .012/S.F. 78,375 S.F. 940 Upgrade 322 Lat. Benefit Storm Trunk Multi 10.40/F.F. 605 F.F. 6,292 Trail 12.40/F.F. 330 F.F. 4,092 Total $23,728 All final assessment rates shall be those in effect at the time of final plat approval based on final plat area and frontage calculations. 157 CONDITIONS: EAGAN WOODHAVEN 1. The 6" water main proposed by this development, the existing 4" water main in Lexington Place 2nd Addition, and the existing 6" water main in the Stuarts 1st Addition shall be interconnected. 2. This development shall adhere to the recommendations of the SWCD. See attached Exhibit B. 3. A culvert shall be required under the entrance to this development. 4. The driveway access location to this development shall be in accordance with Dakota County Highway Department recommendations. See attached Exhibit A. 5. All applicable permits shall be acquired prior to final plat approval. 6. A 60 ft. half right-of-way and a 20 ft. slope easement for Lexington Avenue shall be required. 7. The appropriate ponding easement for Pond DP -18 shall be dedicated. 8- All proper utility and driveway easements as outlined in the staff report shall be dedicated. 9. This development shall be responsible for all additional assessment obligations associated with the development of this plat at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 10 -All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 11 -The plat name shall be changed and/or the project shall be marketed under a different name to avoid confusion with the existing Woodhaven Addition. 12-A financial guarantee shall be submitted for the landscaping and not be released until after one year from the date of installation. 13 -The trash shall be kept in closed containers in the tennants garage until the day of pick-up. 14 -One covered garage space shall be included with the rent. 15 -This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication Fee. i50 DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Farmington Professional Building 821 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: (612) 463-8626 MINNESOTA I SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS March 12, 1987 TO: Mike Foertsch City of Eagan FROM: Barb McCarthy(; Dakota County SWCD RE: Review of Preliminary Plat for Eagan Woodhaven Apartments. We would like to submit the following comments for our review of the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan for Eagan Woodhaven Apartments dated March 5, 1987. INVENTORY OF SOIL RESOURCES. The soils on the proposed site appear suitable for the proposed use. The soils are coarse (sandy loams and sands) and the seasonal high water table is greater than 5 ft. below the existing grade. INVENTORY OF WATER RESOURCES. Pond DP -18.1 is located on the southeast corner of the proposed site. Stormwater is routed from DP -18.1 to DP -18.2 and DP -10.. Dp-10 does not have an outlet at this time. Although these wetlands appear to have a limited use other than stormwater storage at this time, sediments should be retained on-site to retain pond storage capacities. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW. An incomplete erosion and sediment control (E&SC) plan was submitted with this plat. The "General Criteria" and the "Checklist" for an E&SC plan should be used in developing this plan, including the site map and accompanying narrative. 1Q AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER � a DAKOTA COUNTY DAVI OUNTEEERDSR P.E. NGINEE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT (612) 431-1150 March 6, 1987 MINNESO FA 55124 Mr. Tom Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Eagan Woodhaven Addition APC Staff Review Dear Tom: As discussed at the meeting on Monday, March 2, 1987 the subject parcel should show 60' right-of-way for CR 43 (Lexington Ave.) and the access to CR 43 (Lexington Ave.) should be positioned directly across from the driveway to the City park site west of CR 43. Very truly yours, David L. Everds, P.E. County Highway Engineer DLE/PLS/bv cc: Gary Erickson Gary Stevenson AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER GC -1 and GC -2 Stabilization of Denuded Areas. The E&SC plan should address re -vegetation of the site including the location of vegetative measures and seeding and mulching specifications (types, seeding date, species, rate of application, seed placement, fertilizer requirements, method of anchoring mulch). GC -3 Protection of Adjacent Pronerty. The land adjacent to Woodhaven Apartments must be protected from sediment damage, including the property to the north which has not as yet been adequately stabilized. Sediment can be retained on-site by maintaining existing vegetation where cutting and filling will not occur (which will help to filter out sediments), by re -vegetating the site in a timely manner (within 1-2 days after rough grading occurs), and by the proper placement and maintenance of silt curtains and stormsewer inlet filters. GC -4 Timing and Stabilization of Sediment Tran­ina Measures. Erosion and sediment control practices designed to contain sediment on-site must be installed and functional before any clearing, grubbing or grading begins. GC -5 Sediment Basins No need anticipated for the proposed project. GC -6 Cut and Fill Slopes. All cut and fill slopes should be adequately re -vegetated. within 1-2 days after rough, grading the site, specifically behind lots 1 and 4 and in the area immediately east of Lexington Avenue along the entrance road and parking lot. GC -7 Stormwater Management Criteria for Controllin Off -Site Erosion. See description of GC -7 in the "General Criteria" for an erosion and sediment control plan. GC -8 Stabilization of Waterways and Stormsewer The stormsewer is proposed to tie into the existing 15 inch stormsewer pipe. 14 GC -9 Stormsewer Inlet Protection. Stormsewer inlet filters located on site may need to be installed depending on the schedule for re -vegetating the site and blacktopping the boulevard and parking areas. GC -10 Working in or Crossing Watercourses. Not applicable. GC -11 Utilitv Construction. Re -vegetation of all areas disturbed by utility construction should be addressed in the plan, including the installation of the stormsewer down to DP -18. GC -12 Construction Access Routes. To minimize the tracking of mud by vehicle onto Lexington Avenue, we recommend that a temporary gravel construction entrance be installed and maintained at all ingress and egress areas. Specifications for this gravel pad are contained in Eagan's Erosion Control Manual. GC -13 Disposition of Temoorary Measures. All erosion and sediment control measures should be removed after these measures are no longer required. The company responsible for removing these measures should be identified ::r�::'':,;,: ;•.,:.. on the E& SC Plan. GC -14 Maintenance. All erosion and sediment measures should be regularly inspected and maintained as;needed. The individual responsible for this must be identified on the E&SC Plan. We recommend that a statement be placed on the development plan that the home builders will be responsible for E&SC during home construction. At this time, we cannot approve the Erosion Control Plan submitted for this project. We understand that with any new program, it takes time to educate those involved in developing adequate Erosion and Sediment Control Plans. We hope that acceptable Erosion and Sediment Control Plans are submitted with future Preliminary Plats. /6v We recommend that the Preliminary Plat an Erosion and -Sediment Control Plan be approved by SWCD staff before a grading cc: Probe Engineering Applebaum-Gustufson be approved but that submitted and permit is issued. I Ll -L' Iq F RCI An El OMAR., 1 -14 81M ROAD -- ----------------- — /6� =Mmil« All ki D -TIT V 1,0i i i a a z a a a m a z �' ,a y7 Z �?ks d =Mmil« All ki D c_ u, i VJ Z •� W Q � � d Z} W >- Q W O COX^ LVst kt �i c_ u, i U) w `2 1 �i Q Z Q_ J Q a Z Zo Wa Q 0cc a oZ O� J W a Z 0 W r1 c -t i Q P. CO cc III of If 1./ 1i 1 r � 1 1 1• (� dJ `` 1 1 I I','i a +•. X 3 3 /- r �i 1 1 1 1 • 0 1 /_1a I _ 11\Cp\r1 pJ `\\\\\\\\ \ `r �♦ ♦` iii 1 IIII, ,a; r III' rI / � 1 f>• I / IIII I 1 , pr lil I � (\ - Iri IIII ' '• 'r 111 � 1 I 1 IIII 1 n �, 1 1 v xl 1 ep' I 31 ' I ' r A� r t 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 11 I 1 I ♦ IN t ..- � ..r �. .�- _.— - lrc. 3w;ary,�, �r •-n.Ttrr� . r.�1�v /17 t -7 I ! t fY� I t I 7..:l.uoN (COY M LlIM it !MI O I I—• e3 Z t_r ; T W n CL W CJ J � T I r cc Gs . �. +. Z - V A cr CL C3 ' • ff f '[s T 1�1 ix n I • ,w.� dip ..a� � � flirt � !+�r i,��� ., �+ } - D -z �1i.1ElA xabl rl! f�*t \ L r. M S: 30 E -n L.S. S. <'\. .. - EP -4 r' ` �� OP -19 � I �_::.,;_,;.••':; •836.0 /,Ig; 884.0 hqK s. P STI, ! . EP r1 ..Ji �t .\`I may/ 890.4 SERt_. 1.'E_p 829.0 N /, ti t �� $60 0 I I j I I 846 8 X510� ! 87/.7 j -8J?;8.�0 . 3 .�-o�Or -0 i 42- 2)0!710, EP DP-678.QP-1 829.0 N0 857.3 z 856.0 1856.0 r3:0.: �, 866.5 864.4 p! _ .YRIA.L� pA� K� j ,rrt9 f wl h " r ' �lC i�• 24'i N . -- I 16 838.3 11876.3 ! '' IJE` -� 855.4 877.2 _.., DYDP- =26 �� 1874.8 L.S.-7 4--r7a y _�/ \/ i I I N0.5 i ._,n_ ,1877,.4-1.-Y% ,,:1L•� DnOdB 9.$�nD-D_pIM. l' D -s !r0 RD /?ammma9 1 i 42" � rE d_ ! -- ....... L.-..... - --- - + I �, • 848.0 DP -9 (F-. �j11;.�T..E f _I -- `•. c� 9 01 DP-ZO D .-- �60.0 " ''-+r '° 1,- gj _..... J , ? TOh tiR1�i 862.8 �y_�SC..... - ^-1 HILLS 904.2 / �2• 897.6`N'0'LFAhY PARK 882. A 01' 1^' WESCOTT IM D -c B - (; ..-.�1.�. 8� I D.w �., CARRIAGE -- � N� f �r HILLS I I f. Y� I ti1,'•' ;j GOLF I E -h -� :_ GARDEN LJP i4 ! )IOP -22r.(( r % J ti SE _RP -66 �C_.xti:! _J _ _ DP h� _..._ I 8353.0 PIL ! j 690.0 �,, :,��-�;- --�_ 873.0 -I - -- 1I . 854.0/.. --871.0 :T 89 2 :,,,;; • ", 882.0 / BBDO•"*:: •_;?;.. -„S :g fDPr2 LN JP-' 3 ~ i.r�':..,. 886.4 tAC =OPEN= i CENTER �'9' ;. _.i `4- ,p cl�. J-By� f1�� L, 11:..� ` ,c3B92.G� j I I iJ-- JP -5P L �; • �i832:0 1 F+ �U -`- _. - -��, 882 854.0 �!L rJP 67 1 �ff C t�jP'5GJPL4,11-`i 887S �- 1.8800r1.�6JCi r888.7.Y1L8t3'$.�-42 - X87971'`. { 4!-)4-90/.5 JP -6 °8973 " 887.1 N ? - l 893.0 J88�16��2� 5 I I . JP 147f�> �i 895.5 JP 46 �. r'': / . JP 15 : .� 849:2 y _b 1=�'� T Tf ~ )GE 892.3 `.::. 887.0--..j 12� 844'0 a ,4)G'i _ t I L.S.-15 826.0. x.8465: 18.851.3 +. je N -i` r 83.5 12 ,JP -41 ; 795310. 885.3-_ ., L.S.-I 2� Liz i. w 12 JP 63'+- I J 887.0 < \ 1 _ 481 --- 8997; JP -32 - 885.o -+ j 9007 7 JP -31 888.!,JP -39 - -- 884.0 - *:: 30. - ,N�_ 880.4 895.0.. . •, 815.7 JPT' e o e �y �.- 4 R�1AD1 / �� 21 -n 89 890 �v E � .df=i. r . " L_. T. i'T f � I 1'r.Z,-ll'T1TiTTT1 I o _ c o C� , `, . 974n i EAG'AN WOODHAVEN SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. #1 city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: plate PUBLIC /lo DEPARTMASTER LAN R 18AR1c�'0 18" �IZ- 52 5 54 2.0 45.8/ A9 12" / / 51.2/ 7 .0 675/91.0 67.0 .1 59.0 0 0:5 M. G. _ - LQI4 / :1► / U.S. POSTAL 5fl` ELEVg'fE0 STORAGE ^ /� /v SERVICE 51 2.3 77. i W. L. 1059 4 / /* 43.8/68.0 I 48 j r d ( - 2" 50.3/ 75.0 11 /r 8 N A 49 1... 1.. 84.0 u V/P74.0 DITION55:1/ 4.0 r� c" 12°1 10 18 - ..'Y!r /tiw 12" Irz i;8 6'��. 7� 7.9/ 5T. /73.0 46.3/62.0 40.4/57.5 . r/ 141.9/60.0 615/80. 75 r ° 615/80.0 15J I IS° 0° 74 94NKFF DOo R EY E ENT, :N.}L ; I L_ `1 67 l i fib L _ 4TH ACD. TO RF3.6/ 2.0 I.�i1` ���T f� 8 IHEIGH'TSg!' r ( ! 2ND ADDITION CARRIAGE $;'r:;:;� HILLS r:•: GOLF '. �. COURSE GARDEN :; 55/,70:0 90:'3f"ICAT KNOB ---- r 02 T :103. 24" l..__ KWOOD r ��8_I ,183 0• CEN :43.3/60.0101 130n CENRIQ46.9/'6 16" !f/! 3Q4 ILO# -N }3�L Sst i09 69.0 —� f frt S (. — FI - y- (� ( ! III 50.3/67.0; I CITYU 1 ,. / HALL 1� I8�l/ 12" 111 i/ �INFSCJT R )An 105 53.2/68. 50.4/67.0 1 �` F_'� � 1611 „m�►�.�s�+..i 119 54.6/71.0 M � IQ'$K 1LDAI E AD1r1011IA" ! city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME EAGAN WOODHAVEN SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. -*3 approved. standard plate ##: WAT R MAST PLAN r$. 1 17 U I 1' j 1 1 1 7-,zs Alp N �} I l s•oi[ � favy N Ji)M !f !M7 if vs 1 O /• 1 1 M r� M v 1 `3 =. CO L.J.. a / •—•Y � u •� F- •_ it J WP 00 16 q — �• W CJ ir �• " -_ 1 v l a l r- •.1 cJ V a ccc Y ° F. CL _ W co ION . , 10 I'll i' ir•s 'ts 1 L+ ax w _ 1. • 16 z 00 0 ZA > 00 CY rr z cc w W IL a. LU CO 0 a 'GEL, Z cc `UJ 0 cc cc W z vcW Ld CD z IL cc 0 LD o LLI 16 00 0 00 CY cc w W LU CO 0 a 'GEL, 00 0 00 CY cc w W LU CO 0 cc 0 cc F W vcW CD z cc 0 o CIO ' sytl I ts•o:[ � racy M sr�M �e rn.r trw / a 0 I � 1 i 4 . • _ .� gip" _ -- �:• Z co W0 —_ILa _ cc Lu a z 0 Lt 1 •L' 4'•1 '1r•r 'tr Y '++- ". ' ,WM d/p ..Yr t if'v7 1A. • , 1, `4�` 11 t+1 �I } k-1 ir'.� i•: i Z .C� Cl) G Z J F— 2 0- U - Q � LU F- Z Z� LU LU W F— m Q Q Z J ^� Q CL • V UJ a � Z J Q Q J cc W F— LU k-1 ir'.� i•: 1 ��r�� t+ t 'K _i• �� lr i Cl) O F— urs N U - LU Z LU LU o m Q J Q CL cc LU J Q Q J cc W F— LU Q � J Q cc w F.. J Q Q Z , Q F— �n ' 1 •1 � 1 1 ��r�� t+ t 'K _i• �� lr MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION VRAA DATE: APRIL 17. 1987 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION - EAGAN WOODHAVEN ADDITION The Parks and Recreation Commission has recommended a cash dedi- cation and trailway along Lexington Avenue for the Eagan Woodhaven Addition. Director of Parks & Recreation /7S APC Minutes March 26, 1987 Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend a continuance of the public hearing to the next planning commission meeting. Mr. Harrison suggested that the proposal was a piece -meal development, and Mr. Voracek requested that the drainage swale issue be reviewed. 3 to 1 slopes also should be required. Those in favor were Voracek, Krisnik and Harrison; those against were Gustafson and McCrea. The motion passed. EAGAN WOODHAVEN ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall then convened the next public hearing in regard to the applications of Eagan Woodhaven Partnership for applications for rezoning of 4.58- acres of A (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple), Comprehensive Guide Amendment, and a preliminary plat for 64 units located along Lexington Avenue, south of Yankee Doodle Road, in the northwest quarter of Section 14. Mr. Runkle introduced the proposal and Mr. Dan Gustafson was present to represent the applicant. In response to member McCrea's inquiry, Mr. Gustafson indicated that there continues to be a demand for certain types of apartments, specifically, one -bedroom and efficiency units for younger people. There was some discussion in regard to the exterior material. McCrea moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning and amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan. All voted in favor. McCrea moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The 6 inch water main proposed by this development, the existing 4 inch water main in Lexington Place 2nd Addition, and the existing 6 inch water main in the Stuarts lst Addition, shall be interconnected. 2. This development shall adhere to the recommendations of the SWCD. 3. A culvert shall, be required under the entrance to this development. 4. The driveway access location to this development shall be in accordance with Dakota County Highway Department recommendations. 5. All applicable permits shall be acquired prior to final plat approval. 6. A 60 foot half right-of-way and a 20 foot slope easement for Lexington Avenue shall be required. 7. The appropriate ponding easement for Pond DP -18 shall be dedicated. 4 APC Minutes March 26, 1987 8. All proper utility and driveway easements as outlined in the staff report shall be dedicated. 9. This development shall be responsible for all additional assessment obligations associated with the development of this plat at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval, including Lexington Avenue trailway. 10. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 11. The plat name shall be changed and/or the project shall be marketed under a different name to avoid confusion with the existing Woodhaven Addition. 12. A financial guarantee shall be submitted for the landscaping and not be released until after one year from the date of installation. 13. The trash shall be kept in closed containers in the tenants garage until the day of pick-up. 14. One covered garage space shall be included with the rent. 15. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. All voted yes. HIDDEN VALLEY ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The fourth public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairman Hall on the application of Graham Development Co. for a preliminary plat consisting of 25 lots on 14.5 acres located along the east side of Pilot Knob Road, just north of Deerwood Drive, in the northwest quarter of Section 22. Mr. Runkle reminded the Planning Commission that there had been several proposals for the development of this low valley but did not result in the actual construction. Mr. Tom Graham was present as were his planner, Mr. Gair, Mr. Seger and,Mr. Thene. Mr. Kevin Hill, 1350 Rocky Lane, questioned the appropriateness of 25 homes surrounded by larger lots. He was also concerned about the stub proposed towards Rocky Lane, and whether any sewer or water assessments would be involved. In response, Mr. Colbert indicated that without further review, he was not aware of any assessments and that the proposal should stabilize ponds within the area. In response to the statement that the pond on Lot 5 of Skovdale No. 2 was rising, Mr. Colbert said the City would want to investigate to see if the outlet had been plugged. F1 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty PRELIMINARY PLAT/HIDDEN VALLEY ADDITION G. Preliminary Plat Entitled Hidden Valley Addition Consisting of 25 Lots on 14.5 Acres --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on March 26, 1987 to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by Graham Development Company, requesting a preliminary plat entitled Hidden Valley. This subdivision consists of 25 lots on 14.8 acres and is zoned R-1. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pages 1 through for your reference. For a copy of the Parks andRe reation Advisory Commission recommendation, refer to pages . For additional information and action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on pages/�-'�-7- . A recommendation of the Planning Commission at the March 26 hearing was for staff to schedule a neighborhood meeting prior to the April 21 Council meeting. That neighborhood meeting was held on Wednesday, April 15 and approximately 15 residents were in attendance. There were a number of questions raised about the type and cost of housing to be constructed on the lots which were generally satisfied by representatives of the developers. There was also a question as to when the Hidden Valley Road stub would be constructed to the north property line of the Hidden Valley development. There were no major objections at the neighborhood meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled Hidden Valley as presented by Graham Development Company. /7g CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (HIDDEN VALLEY) APPLICANT: GRAHAM DEVELOPMENT CO. LOCATION: NWa SECTION 22 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 26, 1987• DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by the Graham Develop- ment Company requesting a Preliminary Plat for Hidden Valley. This plat consists of 25 lots on 14.8 R-1 zoned acres just south of City Hall. LAND USE: Except for a farmstead near the southwest portion of the site, this parcel is in its native condition. That farmstead will be removed with this development. A low ponding area near the southcentral portion of the site approximately 50 feet below a high point at the southeast corner of the site demonstrate the great grade differential in this proposal. The hillsides especially near the ponding area are covered with oaks and native understory plant material. The 100 foot wide William's Brothers Pipeline Easement crosses this plat in a northeasterly manner near the eastern edge of the site. The 1.9 acres to the east of that line to the eastern property line is proposed for parks dedication adjacent to Windcrest Park and a drainage pond. Skovdale Additions are to the north and south. Across Pilot Knob Road to the west are undeveloped agricultural parcels. SITE PLAN: This site is served by a..single.access from Pilot Knob Rd. near the -existing farmstead access. Hidden Valley Drive is stubbed to the north so that a connection could be made to unimproved Rocky Lane in the future. A variance will be needed now for the cul-de-sacs; The longest being almost 900 feet in length. There is no other al- ternative to serve this site. All lots exceed the 12,000 square foot and 85 feet width at the setback line requirements. They range in size from 12,600 - 47,700 square feet with most between 13 - 23,000 square feet. GRADING AND DRAINAGE: This proposed development consists of lightly wooded and rolling topography. Pilot Knob Road is along the west side of the development and is approximately 30 to 40 feet higher than the majority of the development. The rolling topography of the site makes it difficult to develop without disturbing a majority of the site. The low area in the south-central portion, and the east 300 feet of the site that slopes to Pond JP -6, will not be disturbed by this development. The developer has attempted to fit the layout of the street and the lots to the existing topography. Even so, some areas will require 20 feet of fill and other areas will require 20 feet of cut. Staff recommends that the grading plan in the area around Lots 2 and 3 of Block 2 should be revised. The houses on Lots 2 and 3 should not be walkouts and the hill in the back yard of the two lots should not be disturbed. The developer proposes to cut a drainage swale through the back yards of Lots 2 and 3 to provide for an overland outlet for the low area in the southwest corner of the development, but since a storm sewer line has been proposed to drain the low area, then the cutting of the drainage swale will not be necessary. The majority of the drainage from this development will be handled by the proposed storm sewer system that follows Hidden Valley Drive from Pilot Knob Road to Pond JP -6. The landlocked low area in the south-central portion of the site and the low area along the north property line shall have outlets provided through the proposed storm sewer system. Pond JP -6 was designed to handle the runoff from this development and this pond has a gravity storm sewer outlet to the east to Pond JP -49. When Pilot Knob Road is upgraded, the County will be installing a storm sewer line on Pilot Knob Road that will discharge into the proposed storm sewer system that will follow Hidden Valley Drive through this development. The storm sewer line from Pilot Knob Road to the east shall be designed to handle the flow from the storm sewer line on Pilot Knob Road plus the runoff that will be generated from this development and the adjoining properties to the north and south that drain to this development. Based on current information, the storm sewer line draining east from Pilot Knob Road should handle 41 cfs and the storm sewer line as it discharges into Pond JP -6 should handle 60 cfs. An overland drainage swale shall be provided from the low point on Hidden Valley Drive to the low area along the south side of the street. The emergency overland outlet will drain along common side lot lines from the street to the low area. The elevation of the overland outlet shall be no higher than two feet above the elevation of the low point in the street and the elevation shall be lower than the surrounding houses. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer serve this development. approximately 1200 feet of Valley Road to the east to east side of Pond JP -6 in service is not immediately available to The developer proposes to install 8" sanitary sewer installed from Hidden an existing lift station located on the order to serve this development. The /DV alignment of the 1200 feet of sanitary sewer will be in an easement or in the city park that surrounds Pond JP -6. The sanitary sewer will be a difficult line to install because some sections will be 25 feet deep and another section is proposed to cross a narrow area of Pond JP -6. Also, the sanitary sewer line will be below the water table in some sections and the soils will be unstable in the area around the pond. The existing lift station was designed to serve this development. If the additional sanitary sewer line is installed to provide service to this development, then the developer's preliminary utility plan is acceptable. The sanitary sewer layout shall include an 8" stub to the north property line of this development to serve the Skovdale No. 2 development and an 8" stub to the east right-of-way line of Pilot Knob Road. The 8" line at Pilot Knob Road shall be extended across Pilot Knob Road when the County improves the road in 1987 or 1988. The 8" line that will cross Pilot Knob Road will serve approximately 15 acres of undeveloped area along the west side of Pilot Knob Road. Water service for this development of adequate pressure and capacity is available by connecting to the existing 16" watermain on the west side of Pilot Knob Road. Staff recommends that the connection to the existing 16" watermain should be with an 8" watermain rather than a 6" watermain. The 8" watermain should be continued along Hidden Valley Drive to Hidden Valley Road where the size should change to a 6" diameter line. The 8" watermain is recommended to increase the supply because this water supply system will be a dead end system of 900 feet. A 6" watermain shall be installed on Hidden Valley Road to the north property line of this development. The 6" watermain could provide service to the Skovdale No. 2 development if that development decided to connect to the City's water supply system. It the 6" watermain ever is installed in the Skovdale No. 2 development, then it should loop around to the north and west and connect to the existing 16" watermain on Pilot Knob Road to eliminate the dead end system in the Hidden Valley development. STREETS /ACCESS /CIRPULATION: Access to this development will be provided by Pilot Knob Road which is proposed to be upgraded to a four lane design with trailways on both sides during 1987 and 1988. Only one access will be allowed onto Pilot Knob Road from this development and the location of the access point fits the topography of the site: Because of the topography, this development is proposing two cul-de-sacs. A stub street is provided in the center of the development to the north property line to provide for future street upgrading of Rocky Lane in the Skovdale No. 2 development. Currently, Rocky Lane is a private, narrow street that is a dead end and its length is approximately 1200 feet. Since the Hidden Valley Drive street system is a dead end with a length of approximately 900 feet, staff has recommended that the two street systems be connected to provide for a loop. This development has proposed to provide the stub street to the north, but the connection will not be made until the residents of Skovdale No. 2 petition the City to have Rocky Lane /91/ . 1, improved to a public street. The developer has proposed a 10% street grade on Hidden Valley Drive on the descending grade that goes east from Pilot Knob Road and also on the ascending grade for the cul-de-sac at the east end of the development. Since the City's standard for maximum street grades is at 8%, staff recommends that the developer revise the grading plan to conform to the 8% maximum street grade. Also, the developer shall meet the City's standard of a 2% street grade requirement for the first 100 feet for street intersections. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAYS: A 60 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob Road or Dakota County Highway 31. Also, because of the potential grading required to rebuild Pilot Knob Road staff recommends this development provide a 20' slope easement adjacent the westerly boundary of this proposed development. The internal streets shall provide a 60 foot right-of-way and the cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum radius of 55 feet to the right-of- way line. No slope easements are anticipated from the adjacent private properties to the north and south. A 30 foot wide combined utility easement shall be dedicated over the proposed sanitary sewer line and storm sewer line that should follow the north property line from Hidden Valley Road to the east property line. In areas where the utilities are greater than 20 feet deep, then the easement width shall be increased. PERMITS: This development will be responsible for obtaining the following permits prior to final plat approval: 1. MPCA sewer extension permit. 2. Mn. Dept. of Health water main extension permit. 3. Dakota County Highway access and work within County right-of- way permit. 4. Construction of the sanitary sewer and storm sewer across the east end of the development will require the acquisition of a permit from the Williams Brothers Pipeline Company. ASSESSMENTS: The following assessments have been levied against the proposed development: Project # Description Use 88 Sanitary Sewe Trunk S.F. 88 Water Area a S.F. 411 Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. (a) 3.6 acres of the total The proposed development is subject to pending assessments resulting from Project #466 - Pilot Knob Road upgrade. /SI/ The proposed development is subject to the following assessments: Project # Description Usage Rate Quantity Amount 88 Water Area S.F. $1250/Ac. 7.24 Ac. $9,050 411 Storm Sewer Trunk S.F. $.053/S.F. 70,356 S.F. 3,729 88 Water Lateral Ben. S.F. $12.47/F.F. 606.74 F.F. 7,566 Trailway $12.40/F.F. 706.74 F.F. 8,764 TOTAL $29,109 Assessment rates are those in effect at the time of final plat approval and will be calculated using footages and areas in accordance with the final plat. /93 CONDITIONS FOR HIDDEN VALLEY: 1. Staff recommends that the grading plans in the area of Lots 2 and 3, Block 2_ be revised to eliminate the drainage swale in their.respective back yards. 2. The land locked low area in the south-central portion of the site and the low area along the north property shall have outlets provided through the proposed storm sewer. 3. The proposed storm sewer shall 'be sized to handle the appropriate drainage.areas. 4. An alternative to installing the 1200 feet of gravity sewer to the existing lift station on the east side of Pond JP -6 may be installing a lift station on the Hidden Valley property. The feasibility of this lift station will have to be explored in depth. The lift station would then be sized to serve the Hidden Valley development and the adjacent Skovdale No. 2 property. 5. Street and utility stubs shall be provided to the appropriate adjacent properties. - 6. Staff recommends an 8" water main rather than a 6" water main. 7. The appropriate right-of-way and right of access shall be dedicated for CSAR 31 in accordance with Dakota County recommendations. See Exhibit A. 8. Staff recommends that the grading plan be revised to adhere to 8% maximum street grade criteria. Also, the 2% maximum entrance grade criteria shall be adhered to. '.°.9. A 20 foot 'Slope easement is recommended along Pilot Knob Road. ,. 10. All appropriate utility, easements shall be obtained and dedicated. , 11. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all :� '. appropriate permits prior to final plat approval. .*12. 'All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. . 13. An erosion/sediment control plan in accordance with SWCD shall - be provided. See Exhibit B. 14. A variance shall be granted for the cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet.. '15. This plat shall be subject to the recommendations of the Advisory Park and Recreation Commission. GOLF D -II • oil �� .,Dir- � � _ D4.-. D -I 16if GOLF • oil �� .,Dir- � � _ D4.-. D -I 16if i y\ . i9. xrek. �! J 9 ci 21. g m a V Q 00 .....; �� Y I Bks' Q I' d a ;oyni' ;a- 7aian:? �r es. p Ct 1 -- r "_tel �j, � � ' ��\ ��.: f •l m =` P 9ei u LU m _j e a ^ N o I N • 3 � ��- •g Dti's � -a r O tsa 1 n syr -t a m w i Hi C i 0 - ns LL �SL ?j cao vo a' cQ rooNaq m aN i. - m - •ry 'y. ' .. ma I !I' � i J1Q �' � O W i � •tl cli cc y 8aHe Z 171o� < 1 33 • cWc r ror'" O.O ICDV } N Q �, e ■ p. I _ _ - •.i�1. �. �.�•..11.r�ILi��^■\L�•�.• •� i}�iii. �.• . . . . '�-'t m J Q Q Cao Z I I � � MOLLe710aa '.w' • • w"y.�D•otl Oou711o11d—�u�..��.r�o��.e •.�..�.. ��.w_.• ._— lC ON N V 6 O—__ - II r I I Qin I V G U N W~ N :jo c3° Q Z 0 ae 9 z m gCC Z> of Q Q Q W W O £ yn = W Wt or c LES S 0 t11WIP. 03AI3338 N J u •. .i. ON do 40 ---r ---------------------------- z.� : a:.;3;x<, ,._�` • .. .«.«tea- "' ,°.,� ui ZW COL N. 1 ! d nc a CQ CW— Lu milt , � �.\ Tfl ' i ,�•� �I �' � , 111 9�1� S�i+�,j l= LLa; NS na�_;i E: • si -- ---�:' C i W W i 7l ael it 1 O e ao ■/. �S � ��_ •% � iii } �■ -- -- --s 2 O • .' p s •• c }:t J 5 o W t? ccCL IO• � �.. oac'Q 8 1 . • ... .�/ - 7c- A _CL .iq C -ti ''� 1, - - 19 Q f0� t2so �CNc$ i � 4o JIB" •$ •6 .Ie I �' � i V Ot 4 lyJ 1 -y • G�•�-.-�� m O J U n n S S 1 •-C '- '� ■ d C C V O O F •i C f ■p .J y3mmoi~tLU =�W WN 1 Il 8� 1ji1 • MDe1�010)b 'w'OY .M Mo■q-1 IOIW—i�..�um�■■mm�umm�■■��■■��a�;drumm�om>'u�r.■m�•.� lC 'ON 1- �— - . , \ill •ICY •tt -P1�Ii /O )ml RY �' 1111 r R = a Y a a 40 o. �i�iM''+ai'��'�;,1tiT��T3i" • T � � : [,.:-' -i Z rz. F4p& 5-1 cr . ,._. , •;�'v.. l,'',',� ':? a aL;�.•.r—.oma. ....ter- U a LU CO Z O m T y'�,'i •. �� I C7 CL O `1 '` -- -j- -_ • N ! `'i'`� �.," - _ mm fix. CA .. ( , 1 �•\tl Ol A. �' 3 1 '' •. `•---- e :,eek e. { 8.0 -. `., ` y i. `•, is '-'!'y' ?,.,J' t < o t Lx> r•lw Z ...' � • Awa . � � .e., ' �' ~ O • V i N \• �: aei v U. Z I S ti O O . .........t 't • i �.0—..1 4 m % t ... J - C+ -a 3 w L m _ u'i• 0 nodi a d No z f� . ati� •> o� e� e� v m • a �e J y e� �• a s a o v a -I" e=i �- a: m 1 s� { Q 'olno'o °' a . ��� _ . g • s i � N N � N �I � � Y ey s ib � N' j � >• i i V ^S • �•._ p N C W W� .� Jy'/� b �Y i W • a m W W '` 0 0 CC IX lu o ae y Q W W W r � FQJa 4 I ti• • r�urrr�urrr�rr �urr7T.ft. orr�•r�orrrrr rrr�rr •—aC'OM W'1I'Q'O—__ w ;�> s•1't•'L 1[ •ouai� n •+n a>• —" .—. 0 a 160 i�1 � i 1 . • V i N \• �: aei v U. Z I S ti O O . .........t 't • i �.0—..1 4 m % t ... J - C+ -a 3 w L m _ u'i• 0 nodi a d No z f� . ati� •> o� e� e� v m • a �e J y e� �• a s a o v a -I" e=i �- a: m 1 s� { Q 'olno'o °' a . ��� _ . g • s i � N N � N �I � � Y ey s ib � N' j � >• i i V ^S • �•._ p N C W W� .� Jy'/� b �Y i W • a m W W '` 0 0 CC IX lu o ae y Q W W W r � FQJa 4 I ti• • r�urrr�urrr�rr �urr7T.ft. orr�•r�orrrrr rrr�rr •—aC'OM W'1I'Q'O—__ w ;�> s•1't•'L 1[ •ouai� n •+n a>• —" .—. 0 a 160 i�1 � i I 1 1 Ir • • 1 T ; + 1 rr • V i N \• �: aei v U. Z I S ti O O . .........t 't • i �.0—..1 4 m % t ... J - C+ -a 3 w L m _ u'i• 0 nodi a d No z f� . ati� •> o� e� e� v m • a �e J y e� �• a s a o v a -I" e=i �- a: m 1 s� { Q 'olno'o °' a . ��� _ . g • s i � N N � N �I � � Y ey s ib � N' j � >• i i V ^S • �•._ p N C W W� .� Jy'/� b �Y i W • a m W W '` 0 0 CC IX lu o ae y Q W W W r � FQJa 4 I ti• • r�urrr�urrr�rr �urr7T.ft. orr�•r�orrrrr rrr�rr •—aC'OM W'1I'Q'O—__ w ;�> s•1't•'L 1[ •ouai� n •+n a>• —" .—. 0 a 160 i MIN CO ice CC- ,- _ a :. N, a ... y?y �; � w•'3 r ai 'ate?��t',�.��rl �_ ---r---------------------------- :---- �a�3ia,�� �i ,'y X25• ...,r;�,: �. •x� a . .�o v.,• .. m.o. V N Lu F- 3 LLJ 4) 10 cc = W L g O CD U. �••\ T `` `� ,IC , l.a/�� • � -6 LU clop aLU te .,•. o s , r is k.� ,�MMPII s.: ,•.a: �:� 17.1:� N■ 114.3 xYLU E e aS: m R � Yto e I ,� ■ fY 7 � • 'va I �N • a• � � f•' 0 O ��'ti 3 e d -N 'o Q A y O ase �T N -- - P a E a r2'm • ai s , M C �e! J c i > EI n e ■ dcc W w- e1 a1. 7 a N v • ci! 1 N' t - � �~ v �d • ••'1 � _- Q N C W � � n •.. , S f W o �.jr, GG / / ¢ 171 m O N In y¢ 4Fi; < Ori N 1/1 • 1a1�f.�- di W W W i.L•JLi•.AML6A�■� �.aaaaa_■I ►. ¢ J a a a G 1 ` • Iqu.x■■ •.roti a■ wca nwM iaw—i.■■a_.■a_..a_..aa_.. .■a_..s_..�.•. ■■ ••— le •oN •N•ri•9 �_- 1� �_ __ _ _.. - _ . ;��o�� ].s�;ao :dr ir�'an •e, ■waal• a• wm aW —_ .— , TI - 1 � oci as . MYP C1?A177038 �f 567 �a IRR 3. 829.7 j / ,/ f., are I�GARbEN�II"EN � /�` /2`D�..24• ` u1FiREY1 9NNIf / �"� : �' DP- 0 -r To �r600 (�Hdl�HT I'�lL�t+. .. •� n 904.2 �o.'I- -1 /rteII DP.23 _� CP-I 31-ic.-1:: -- �� DP2,-P ,. 0P�1 \I . 893.0 ^' 42 azs.5 K' I I� !� 12 r 88 2.2 A r 826 5 825.0: 2ne j ° f ' B9T.6 l •0'LEAtY P�RKp w 829:7:-- �l� DAN �' -40'1 890.PIL It -��81 J . �a =BBR9.�aO, �2z; ,• ,� ' 2' h i rDP�2�: LEx!trrrrtd B .l 4 NLACI- f �', ; JP"3 PILJ r,1P-6J - �1�- - L CP- 11 I ; / 844.0- 1.=. �l37888.7 P 45} 795.0 ,/„ / 8472- 8S !I `4472:6 • "W8g73,� 808./ JP-2 �r' q i �,�90/.5 JP-62 >zI �rru;y 844.0Ips Y k � 893.0 g �kc4 85/.5 :�J (�5 ilP ` �� :~ 895.5 J 15b. ,=►a, y� 3 84-4--o E ?849.2 6. �+tG�O Neil T_�I }Y 89e _ '__..Tt_ F�18465 ist E 6` t _ l_. ---- Fr- i gni ; _ 3 .S.- Ir -JP -63 _ 12• _ 1 WiLIS�r_�4 _8 899 7 `.i_AM 48�CI*% �,l JP-II 9007u}jt +'� !Ll P-JP-44- .4 ' ....''790.3I I j - LY, \ 830.0 890.7 11 `r JP-5 Y�-- `89Q5.7 4� BO/O 7 1( 8ESCPO 34;0 1... l� f �� ---_ . --- �'' T`1 I M -ACKHA,NK r4•ft\ I+i HALL Iroi17;17T.,11� 27 - Vic_ LII' PARK �' K,IC! ' $s I- �: T r 792.3 JP-10 rSi U r J - F. ter �0 �- 80/.0 / I 820.8 �Oj ADD.' J 4 BP-29` I ----- 809.7 u ;:5 A-45Ij-��' SOU AI �• --d ..I� K VD E - /S ` -- ..•.• SP-28SOP -� - _ 6 r r \P-49 A B-:o 862. •1 �o•'��ii BP-38 6 66B. -. VD/SL rr 818.1 _._..-..... 886.0 % �L 48' 8-b i 1 830.0 -- 8952: tom= _ - �-�•_ -a _ P-9\ .870.61-'P_3 y7 830.0 36-� / 817g1FNi-849.4 01$-FATCHI 36 J �\ 27• B, 872.4 889.9 / �I ���./y.._._. 8652 12 ��j \..� * J-dd`-- 8P-35 905.2 / \ i.{ is J _ ..-_ \a. 908.0------i B c �P-�7JP4 1 %fSlj JP-g PATRiCh _._� 1 920.2 _ i 8 P-25 z BP-4---.•N a 074P�74 5,T�Ty>%?�` 830. PARK'`- `/�/ i ---- 8740 B 19. 874.2a H.. �'� \ a^� 924.0 w/� BB6.5 9 BP-112 B-s}12" 92T.2 i 886,b j ll yHILL'r- �7: f TO OF G 85�JLQ Jamil+ I _ _ 'I LAI EAG 5ZA SB:Q Y' _ C. . A. H.��.1z -�-� -gip-24r-� - 8 I I _ P- 51 1- . HIDDEN VALLEY ADD ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. #1 Cit of ' - -- standard Y ea aft 9 STORM SEWER approved: plate #: PUBLIC _ WORKS y co DEPARTMEN MASTS PLAN I KtA I MtN1 I 8/84.0 PLANT 'URE 1i=NTTN�L (3 SIj.E A00J.— / It -cog) TO�AR!43.6/7 .0 C GHTsSm Y, 2 D.)HEI F, I 1 56.2/67 CST 2ND ADDITION 92..0 X:D C L3,0 q ------ 1'r AH 18 HILLS GOLF 1 11 55�/, 6673VI31ODT KNOB COURSE :103 40 . .... . �CKWOOO 3ol. CENTER-- 1811 RAILS (*46.91/- 110 43.3/60.1 104 ILO N, *O 4 , -- 1%�'.. 4.7/98.0 7 US W i� W;� J°-1 q�7� - r _ll 18" L N T dL A CK FI ILL5 78.7/96.0 1 CITY HALL % iV, -ACKHAWK rI 105 53. PARK K _j X top X 51.7/670 118 7 .... .. 120 L_ 59.9/75 - - r0RAGE �124 44.6/59.0'16 " -059 0 1251o261 1. 1 38.3/94.0 xi 12" 160 1.8/31.0 do 88.5/ 82.%/, 1 OD"i P,4.0 , 116" 100.0 0./107.0vo / /3 65.0 42.67.0 16 _5� r g A HI 12' I city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS 21 K- N = CA 0-r1k A CO m f__ 59.8/ -1 % 50.3/67.01 181 ivFStOTT PC 50.4*/67.0 4131.0 12's r now em ED 54.6/71.0 OK. 16" F (I lit) m— 1— ago% 51.4/65.0 18.4/29.0 PATRICK EA GAN' PARK __3T Ir6 M.G. GROUNC 5000 G.P.M. H.W. L 1; 1 71 —.10vi 183 6D68.0/82.0 182 68.0/ 24" .0/720 72r0r, 200 HIDDEN VALLEY ADD SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. -3p3 approved •- standard plate WATER MASTER PLAN MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION VRAA DATE: APRIL 17. 1987 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION - HIDDEN VALLEY ADDITION The Parks and Recreation Commission has recommended the following for the Hidden Valley Addition: 1. Land Dedication of 2.1 Acres 2. Cash Dedication Equivalent to One -Half the Required Amount 3. Trail between Lots 11 and 12 Extending from the Cul -De -Sac to the Park Area 4. Trail on Pilot Knob Road Director of Parks and Recreation /W APC Minutes March 26, 1987 8. All proper utility and driveway easements as outlined in the staff report shall be dedicated. 9. This development shall be responsible for all additional assessment obligations associated with the development of this plat at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval, including Lexington Avenue tr ailway. 10. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 11. The plat name shall be changed and/or the project shall be marketed under a different name to avoid confusion with the existing Woodhaven Addition. 12. A financial guarantee shall be submitted for the landscaping and not be released until after one year from the date of installation. 13. The trash shall be kept in closed containers in the tenants garage until the day of pick-up. 14. One covered garage space shall be included with the rent. 15. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. All voted yes. HIDDEN VALLEY ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The fourth public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairman Hall on the application of Graham Development Co. for a preliminary plat consisting of 25 lots on 14.5 acres located along the east side of Pilot Knob Road, just north of Deerwood Drive, in the northwest quarter of Section 22. Mr. Runkle reminded the Planning Commission that there had been several proposals for the development of this low valley but did not .result in the actual construction. Mr. Tom Graham was present as were his planner, Mr. Gair, Mr. Seger and Mr. Thene. Mr. Kevin Hill, 1350 Rocky Lane, questioned the appropriateness of 25 homes surrounded by larger lots. He was also concerned about the stub proposed towards Rocky Lane, and whether any sewer or water assessments would be involved. In response, Mr. Colbert indicated that without further review, he was not aware of any assessments and that the proposal should stabilize ponds within the area. In response to the statement that the pond on Lot 5 of Skovdale No. 2 was rising, Mr. Colbert said the City would want to investigate to see if the outlet had been plugged. kgs APC Minutes March 26, 1987 Mr. Harold Buttelson, 1365 Rocky Lane, suggested that the stub street to his parents property was not appropriate, since they had no intention of developing. Mr. Don Vogtmann, a resident to the south of the proposal, questioned the drainage south of the property, which Mr. Colbert indicated would be handled by the upgrade of Pilot Knob Road in the summer of 1987. Mr. Marvin Rodich, 1345 Deerwood Drive, was present, as was Richard Rodich who expressed concern in regard to the access of the proposed park parcel from residential areas and the existing park property. It was also noted that the hearing notice and agenda stated that the property was located on the west side of Pilot Knob Road, rather than the east. Assistant City Attorney David Keller indicated that neither Minnesota Statutes Section 462.358 nor City Code contained determinative language as to the impact of the potential error in the notice, relative to the location of the property to Pilot Knob Road. There was some discussion and it was suggested that the item be re -noticed for the City Council meeting in order to assure that residents have the opportunity to be heard. It was also pointed out that a variance was requested for the 900 foot cul-de-sac and it appeared to be a hardship as this was the only way to develop the property as suggested by staff. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, with a variance for a 900 foot cul-de-sac, subject to the following conditions: 1. The grading plans in the area of Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 shall be revised to eliminate the drainage swales in their respective back yards. 2. The land locked low area in the south-central portion of the site and the low area along the north property shall have outlets provided through the proposed storm sewer. 3. The proposed storm sewer shall be sized to handle the appropriate drainage areas. 4. An alternative to installing the 1200 feet of gravity sewer to the existing lift station on the east side of Pond JP -6 may be installing a lift station on the Hidden Valley property. The feasibility of this lift station will have to be explored in depth. The lift station would then be sized to serve the Hidden Valley development and the adjacent Skovdale No. 2 property. 5. Street and utility stubs shall be provided to the appropriate adjacent properties. 6. An 8 inch water main rather than a 6 inch water main shall be installed. /9G ri APC Minutes March 26, 1987 7. The appropriate right-of-way and right of access shall"be dedicated for CSAH 31 in accordance with Dakota County recommendations. 8. The grading plan shall be revised to adhere to the 3% maximum street grade criteria. Also, the 2% maximum entrance grade criteria shall be adhered to. 9. A 20 foot slope easement is required along Pilot Knob Road. 10. All appropriate utility easements shall be obtained and ded icated . 11. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all appropriate permits prior to final plat approval. 12. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 13. An erosion/sediment control plan in accordance with SWCD shall be provided. 14. A variance shall be granted for the cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet. 15. This plat shall be subject to the recommendations of the Advisory Park and Recreation Commission. 16. The developer shall provide a trailway into the proposed park property from the public street. 17. Preliminary plat shall be re -noticed for public hearing before the City Council. 18._ Development shall have a neighborhood meeting with the neighbors prior to the City Council meeting. 19. The flooding of the Staff property by the storm pond shall be reviewed by staff prior to the City Council meeting. 20. The developer shall advise all potential buyers of the location of the Williams Brothers Pipeline. All voted yea. 7 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One PRELIMINARY PLAT%CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SILVER BELL 2ND ADDITION H. A Preliminary Plat and a Conditional Use Permit for an Automotive Service Center, Restaurant and 103,000 Square Foot Office Showroom --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on March 26, 1987 to consider an application by Dallas Development Company for a preliminary plat consisting of 103,000 square feet of office showroom, an automotive service center of approximately 11,000 square feet, a 10,000 square foot restaurant and a retail service area of 16,100 square feet. There was also a conditional use permit for a car wash, motor fuel sales and for the sale of wine and 3.2 beer sales. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the conditional use permit for motor fuel sales and car wash and also the wine and 3.2 beer sales, however, the preliminary plat that was proposed for retail was denied. Mr. Bernie Frey representing Dallas Development Company is requesting that the preliminary plat and conditional use permit be withdrawn at this time. The development company is planning to address the concerns of the Planning Commission and resubmit the application for further consideration. The letter is enclosed on page `'`7—. For City Council review a copy of the staff report is enclosed on pages ZOO through 21!5. Also enclosed on page/ W6 _ throw _ is a copy of the APC action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge the request of Dallas Development Company and remove the preliminary plat application and conditional use permit from the formal agenda. /9p 1.1 a91as evelopment Company Real Estate Developers • Investors April 15, 1987 Mayor Bea Blomquist City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Mayor Blomquist: The Dallas Development Company is requesting the Preliminary Plat.Application and Conditional Use Permit be withdrawn for an automotive service center, restaurant, and a 103,000 square foot office showroom located on 13.68 acres on the west side of Highway 13 and north of Silver Bell Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 18. We are presently addressing the concerns of the planning commission and will be resubmitting the application. Please make this withdrawal. Thank you. Sincerely, Bernie Frey BF/ack /� • 10369 West 70th Street • Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • (61 2) 941-2971 • • 418 North Main Street, #212 • Euless. TX 76039 • (817) 540-2242 • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for Dallas Development 2nd Addn. APPLICANT: Dallas Development LOCATION: SV.- Section 18 EXISTING ZONING: LI (Light Industrial) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 26 March 1987 DATE OF REPORT: 18 March 1987 REPORTED BY: Planning & Engineering APPLICATION: Separate applications have been submitted By Dallas Development Company, owners of the Silver Bell Plaza, requesting a Preliminary Plat for a 103,000 SF office/showroom, an automotive service center of approx. 11,000 SF and a 10,000 SF restaurant attached to a retail area of 16,100 SF. The Conditional Use Permit is for a car wash, motor fuel sales and potentially for on sale wine and 3.2 beer sales. This 13.68 acre site is along the west side of Hwy 13 and north of Silver Bell Road. ZONING: The main planning issue with this plat is* the request for supportive retail use. LI districts do not have retail type uses listed as permitted or conditional use items. To allow this project to be built in its current form either amending the Code to allow a percent of supportive retail use or permitting certain retail uses would be necessary.. Another alternative would be to re -zone a portion of this site to a commercial district that would permit retail use. The restaurant will require a separate liquor license. The applicant feels there is a need for supportive retail since this proposal and the Silver Bell Plaza contain approx. 245,000 SF of building area. The percentage of requested retail area for the two projects is 6.5% of the total building area of both projects. Also Hwy 13 acts as a barrier for pedestrian use - especially in the winter months. The area to the west is an undeveloped R-4 parcel which could add hundreds of residents to the immediate area. Some NB type use would then be available for those tennants as well as those people who work west of Hwy 13. If the .plan were approved as is, all parking numbers and setbacks would meet Code requirements. GRADING/ DRAINAGE: During the construction of the Cedar Avenue Freeway, MnDot used this development and the abutting property to the northwest as a borrow site, consequently, the area was lowered approximately 20 ft. Currently, the graded area is fairly flat with a slight grade to the northwest. Also, there is a steep bank along the east property line. The natural grades are 20' - 30' higher on the east side of this property in comparison to the cut in comparison to the cut areas on the west side. The preliminary grading plan submitted by the developer proposes to install a series of retaining walls along the east property line that will be from 6' to 16' high. Staff recommends against the use of the retaining walls along the east property and would prefer that the developer obtain a slope easement across the abutting properties and regrade the area to match the elevations of this development. The final grading plan should show the existing contours and the proposed contours for at least 200 ft. of the adjoining property. The proposed contours should be designed to match the elevations of this development to allow the adjoining properties to develop effectively. The retaining wall along the south property -line of this development is necessary to protect an existing 16" water main that is located approximately 10 ft. south of the property line. The developer proposes to lower the elevations along the south property line to provide for a parking lot. The retaining wall in this area could be eliminated if 300 ft. of the existing 16" water main was lowered, or if the elevation of the parking lot could be raised to 7 ft. above the elevation of the existing water main, or if 16 parking spaces were eliminated and the area was used to slope up to the water main. The developer shall determine the exact location and elevation of the existing 16" water main to assist the designer of the retaining wall. The retaining wall shall be at least 10 ft. from the water main and the water main shall be at least 7 ft. deep after the area is graded. The developer -has petitioned the City to install the storm sewer system on Kennebec Drive from Seneca Road to Silver Bell Road. This storm sewer system would be designed to handle the storm water runoff from this development plus the adjoining properties to the east and south. The storm sewer system on Kennebec Drive will drain to the west to the existing 36" storm sewer line on Silver Bell Road. The 36" line was installed by MnDot when Silver Bell Road was reconstructed in conjunction with the Cedar Avenue Freeway construction. The 36" line handles the runoff from the Silver Bell I development and drains to the north across Outlot 3 of the Silver Bell Addition. The City's consultant will be reviewing the capacity of the existing 36" line to determine if the line can handle the flow from the proposed line on Kennebec Drive. If the combined flow is too large for the existing 36" line, then another storm sewer line will need to be installed or a storm water detention pond will be required. The 36" storm sewer line shall be extended to the north to the ravine to control the erosion in Outlot 3 of the Silver Bell Addition. /qf The developer shall provide storm sewer stubs to the east property line of this development for the vacant properties to the east. The downstream storm sewer facilities shall be sized to handle the extra flow. The development shall adhere to erosion/ sediment control measures in accordance with SWCD recommendations (See attached Exhibit A.) UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth has been provided along the north and west sides of the development. The existing 12" R.C.P. sanitary sewer line that flows through the north edge of the development shall be tested before work has begun and after the construction is complete for this development. If the existing 12" sanitary sewer line is damaged, then the developer shall be responsible for repairing the damage. The existing 16" water main along the southeast edge of the development and the existing 8" water main at Kennebec Drive and Seneca Road will supply adequate pressure and supply to the proposed development. The developer has petitioned the City to install a 12" trunk water main on Kennebec Drive from Seneca Road to Silver Bell Road and a 12" trunk water main along the east right-of-way line of Silver Bell Road from Kenenbec Drive to the existing 16" water main along the northwest right-of-way line of S.T.H. 13. The proposed 12" trunk water main will benefit this development plus the future industrial developments to the west and east. The preliminary utility plan shows a 12" trunk water main along the east right-of-way line of Silver Bell Road and .an 8" water main 250 ft. east of Silver Bell Road. If the 8" water main was increased in size to a 12" water main and the line was extended to the southeast for 320 ft., then the proposed 12" water main along Silver Bell Road could'be eliminated. This development shall install 6" sanitary sewer and 6" water main service stubs to the east property line to provide service to the vacant properties to the east. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this development is available from the inplace Silver Bell Road and the proposed Kennebec Drive. The developer has petitioned the City to construct Kennebec Drive from Seneca Road to Silver Bell Road. Silver Bell Road is a 44 ft. wide, 9 -ton design street and Kennebec Drive will be constructed also as a 44 ft. wide, 9 -ton design street. The completion of Kennebec Drive will improve the traffic circulation for the Cedar Industrial Park. The only access onto S.T.H. 13 at a signalized intersection for the Cedar Industrial Park is at Silver Bell Road. There are no traffic signals on S.T.H. 13 at Seneca Road, Shawnee Road, or Blackhawk Road. ZQZ The alignment of Kennebec Drive will have to be revised in the north part of the development. The developer's plans will need to be revised in this area to accomodate the revised alignment. Staff recommends that the connection of Kennebec Drive to Silver Bell Road shall be at a right angle. Also, staff recommends that the proposed driveway locations along Silver Bell Road be at the same location as the driveways on the opposite side of the street, and the developer's grading plan is in compliance with this recommendation. All entrances to the proposed development shall be 30 ft wide, face to face. The triangular shaped property along the east property line of this development must be provided with a 30 ft. wide street access to Kennebec Drive. Even though the triangular shaped property abutts S.T.H. 13, the property must be served with a street access from the northwest because no accesses will be allowed onto S.T.H. 13. The street access will connect to Kennebec Drive and cut through the north edge of the Silver Bell II development. The proposed street will serve the driveways on the north edge of the Silver Bell II development and the triangular shaped property to the east. The final grading plan for this development shall show the proposed grade for this street and the grade will allow the adjoining properties to develop effectively. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAYS/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate a 40 ft. half right-of-way for the construction of Kennebec Drive. A 60 ft. right-of-way shall be dedicated through the north portion of the development for the proposed street from Kennebec Drive to the east property line. The alignment of this street will be established by negotiating with this developer and the surrounding properties to the east. This development shall also be responsible for dedicating a minimum 20 ft. utility easement over any public utilities not installed within public 'right-of-way. In areas where the utilities are greater than 20 ft. deep, the easement width shall be increased to a.minimum of 30 ft. No unusual permit requirements are anticipated beyond the normal MPCA, MWCC and Dept. of Health review for sanitary sewer and water extensions. A preliminary layout plan should be submitted to MnDot as soon as possible to allow them to review the proposed improvements along S.T.H. 13 and provide comments. ASSESSMENTS: The parcel proposed to be developed as Dallas Development 2nd Addition was previously assessed for the following improvements: PROJECT # DESCRIPTION USAGE 4 Sanitary Sewer Trunk S.F. 76 Water Lateral Benefit C/I 76 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit ---- 86 Water Area C/I 94 Silver Bell Road - Grading ---- m �dt 128 Silver Bell Road - Surfacing ---- 274 Silver Bell Road - Improvements ---- There are no pending assessments and the following are proposed assessments: Description Usage Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer Trunk C/I $.079 551,034 S.F. $43,531 Dallas Development has petitioned for storm sewer, water supply and street improvements to Kennebec Drive. The costs for these improvements will be identified at the time of formal public hearing. All final assessment rates shall be those in effect at the time of final plat approval based on final plat area and frontage calculations. CONDITIONS: DALLAS DEVELOPMENT 2ND ADDITION 1. After the uses are determined, the site plan shall be reviewed based upon those uses to ensure Code conformance. 2. Staff recommends against the use of retaining walls along the east property. The appropriate slope easements shall be obained from the adjoining property owner. 3. The developer shall preserve the integrity of the existing 16" water main. A minimum of 7 ft. of cover and 10 ft. horizontal separation from the proposed retaining wall shall be maintained. 4. Provisions shall be made to account for the additional storm water runoff in accordance with the recommendatinos in the staff report. 5. The developer shall extend storm sewer to the easterly line of the development to serve the adjacent property. 6. The developer shall be responsible for any damages to the existing 12" sanitary sewer during development. 7. Staff recommends that the proposed 6" internal water main be replaced witha 12" water main connecting the existing 16" water main along S.T.H. 13 and the proposed 12" water main in Kennebec Drive. This will eliminate the need for a 12" water main along Silver Bell Road. 8. Water and sewer services shall be provided to adjacent properties in accordance with the staff report. 9. The developer shall install hydrants in accordance with staff recommendations. 10. The connection of Kennebec Drive and Silver Bell Road shall be at a right angle. 11. This development shall provide access to the adjacent easterly property from Kennebec Drive in accordance with City standards. 12. All entrances shall be 30 ft. wide, face to face, and in alignment with adjacent property entrances. 13. this development shall dedicate a 40 ft. half right-of-way for Kennebec Drive. 14. This development shall dedicate the appropriate utility easements. 15. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 16. Final plat approval shall be contingent upon approval of the proposed Kennebec Drive improvements by Council action. 17. Final detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan - shall be submitted in accordance with the SWCD recommendations. See Exhibit A. 20Y L, ,,- 5;e,. 0, NrlD� �«!10[ 206 !flu/' .. . a _.� . ... _a�3o IMm � C" � C= � � � � uj C.; � � .�. 0 Cf) LLJ z _z � Q � tif v7~ fPE LIITTAL fMi SUBMITTAL LI/JE7 I E E ai E E Q SILVER BELL owNen (L� Fcllf?A,. d Y. +�,;�;„—�M DALLAS DEVELOPMENT CO. �'�,,;; ��„ ,� ... __.. �_ EAGAN, MINN.. Eoe. fnunrt..nw... PRE—NARY PLAT [Wali iAL 7r1f/E[ [ w.' �`�,Y SILVER , LII OWNER :C]2 ' EAGAN, MINN. DALLAS DEVELOPMENT CO. � � [DENL�SF,E `EN �' F SiLVEA SaL {LOAD — �^ y , titi. o a i ' ! 1 q a " • • - M SILVER BELL II OWNER ucw ..+asou bALLAS DEVELOPMENT CO. i` t,� iii ttt i � s s �ij itt itt � t t M • a " • • - M SILVER BELL II OWNER ucw ..+asou bALLAS DEVELOPMENT CO. city of eagan 5 5�1 r: IDA ED TME SILVER BELL 11 . . ......... SUBJECT PARCEL STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN CP -6 0r 790.7 806.0 FIG.. #1 approved: standardplate #: n C Z 7 C0 0 C0 m m m A[YIIi.\ 311IIT/ PAI I OWNER - w. DALLAS DEVELOPMENT CO. EDEw /REIRIE, YIwN m RiDf� n �Ff I f 'O C Z 7 C0 0 C0 m m m A[YIIi.\ 311IIT/ PAI I OWNER - w. DALLAS DEVELOPMENT CO. EDEw /REIRIE, YIwN C',N(1'f-( i /4--L _ DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT MINNESOTA L `716 SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS March 11, 1987 TO: Mike Foertsch City of Eagan FROM: Lynn M. Chakoian,�--�'' Dakota County SWCD RE: Silver Bell II Preliminary Plat BACKGROUND: Farmington Professional Building 821 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: (612) 463-8626 Dallas Development Company has submitted a preliminary plat proposal for Silver Bell II. Plans include a site plan, landscape plan, utility plan and grading plan. A Preliminary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has not been submitted. SOIL AND WATER RESOURCES: The soil series located within the site area are well suited for -the proposed,use. The seasonal watertable is greater than 5 feet below the surface and no organic soils are present. Soil textures include silt loam and sandy loam. No wetlands, water bodies or holding basins are located on the subject property. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL: No Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been submitted. The plan should follow the "Checklist" and "General Criteria" provided by the City of Eagan. Some specific information follows that may be useful in preparation of the plan. 1(5 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER °OJ00, O EROSION CONTROL MEASURES Within two days of completion of rough grading, the entire site should be seeded and mulched to stabilize the disturbed areas. Seeding and mulching details, as identified on the "Checklist", should be specified. Structural measures needed for erosion control on this site may include temporary gravel construction entrances, silt curtain along the north (Kennebec Drive) side of the development, and storm sewer inlet filters. Detailed plans for these structural practices should be provided. The location and temporary stabilization of any stockpiles of soil should also be included. Soil being delivered to the site must be placed so that sediment is not allowed to enter onto the adjacent roads. EROSION CONTROL MANAGEMENT All erosion and sediment measures should be regularly inspected and maintained as needed. The individual responsible for this must be identified on the plan. Schedules for installing utilities, revegetation of those disturbed areas, building construction and blacktopping are required. These schedules impact what erosion control measures will be necessary. Disposition of erosion and sediment control measures needs to be addressed. Include a contact person responsible for final clean up of the site. OTHER COMMENTS Alignment of the stormwater pipe off-site and adequate outlet stabilization needs to be addressed. No downstream information was provided in the utilities plan. Since the retaining wall extends to the top of the hill slope, there will be no uncontrolled flow of water over the wall. We recommend that a statement be placed on the development plan indicating that the builders will be responsible for erosion and sediment control during construction. CONCLUSIONS We understand, that with any new program, it takes time to educate those involved in developing adequate Erosion and Sediment Control Plans. We hope that acceptable Erosion and Sediment Control Plans are submitted with future Preliminary Plats. We recommend that the Preliminary Plat be approved, but that an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan be submitted and approved before a grading permit is issued.- cc: ssued: cc: Dallas Development Pope Associates Inc. v'6 APC Minutes March 26, 1987 DALLAS DEVELOPMENT 2ND ADDITION - SILVER BELL II PRELIMINARY PLAT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The next public hearing convened by Chairman hall was in regard to the applications of Dallas Development Company for preliminary plat and conditional use permits for the car wash, motor fuel sales, and wine and 3.2 beer sales, located on 13.68 acres on the west side of Highway #13 and north of Silver Bell Road, in the southeast quarter of Section 18. City Planner Runkle described the proposal located within a Light Industrial district, which does not, under City Code, allow for the uses proposed.. There being no one from the public to respond, Mr. Bernie Frye of Dallas Development Company appeared, indicating_ that the first portion of the development, Silver Bell I Addition was 600 occupied. He suggested that the proposed uses, including gas pumps, service bays, convenience store, restaurant and other retail, would be mainly for the convenience of employees of the businesses located within Silver I and II Additions. He also indicated that the developer was in the process of attempting to acquire an additional portion of property to resolve some engineering problems, relative to a water main. Chairman Hall suggested it might be appropriate to rezone the property to Planned Development to allow the mixes of uses being proposed. Members Harrison and Krisnik expressed concern as to whether the uses within the First Addition were allowed within the particular zoning district. Member McCrea indicated approval of what had been constructed so far, but also requested a definition of the proposed uses. Chairman Hall suggested the proposal was much like multi -story uses within downtown metropolitan areas, where the service -retail type uses are on the .lower floors to accommodate the workers in the office areas. It was noted that Silver Bell Road was the only access to the area, which was also within one-half mile of 3 other retail centers. Harrison moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat, based on its non-compliance with Light Industrial zoning district requirements. All voted yea, except McCrea who voted no`. Hall moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a car wash and motor fuel sales. All voted in favor except Harrison who voted no. McCrea moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for wine and 3.2 beer sales. All voted yes, except Harrison who voted no. Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two ADDIT~TONAfiwv ITEMS: CONSIDER ORGANIZED COLLECTION STUDY A. Consideration of Organzied Collection Study RFP --The Solid Waste Abatement Commission has met on numerous occasions to study different issues relating to the solid waste abatement mandate that cities must comply with by 1990. As a part of the Commisssion's study, there is a recommendation to the City Council that an organized collection study be performed by a consultant. This study is consistent with previous discussions the City Council has had regarding a limit on the number of haulers the City should authorize for the community. The City has approximately $11,000 set aside through the County Landfill Abatement Funding which will be used for the collection study. If the proposals exceed the amound allocated, a portion of the study may be eliminated to stay within the budget. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein has written a request for proposal entitled Organized Residential Refuse Collection Study Consulting Services for the City of Eagan. A copy of this request for proposal is enclosed on pages _Zs through for your review. Assuming the scope of work that actually is outlined starting on page three of the proposal, is approved by the Council the RFP's will be distributed by early May and a period of three weeks will be allowed for response by each of the respective bidders. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the recommendation of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission to proceed with a request for proposals for organized residential refuse collection study consulting services with or without modification to the RFP as presented. Z / 7 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR ORGANIZED RESIDENTIAL REFUSE COLLECTION STUDY CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF EAGAN PROPOSALS DUE: 10:00 A.M., MAY 18, 1987 LOCATION: CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN MN 55122 Z/i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PURPOSE OF REQUEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 III. PROPOSAL CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 IV. SCOPE OF WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 V. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD . . . . . . . . . 5 VI. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 VII. PROPOSAL CONTEXT - GENERAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . 7 VIII. ATTACHMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 A. STREET MAP OF EAGAN IX. PROPOSAL FORM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Vq REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ORGANIZED RESIDENTIAL REFUSE COLLECTION STUDY CONSULTING SERVICES CITY OF EAGAN I. PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST The City of Eagan is requesting proposals for consulting services in the preparation of an Organized Collection Study. Detailed information concerning the City's needs are outlined in the following Request for Proposal. II. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS A. All proposals should be sent and all questions and correspondence should be directed to: Jon Hohenstein Administrative Assitant City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 (612) 454-8100 B. All proposals must be in sealed envelopes and clearly marked in the lower left corner: "Sealed Proposal - Organized Collection Study." All proposals must be received no later than 10:00 a.m., Monday, May 18, 1987, at which time they will be opened. Seven copies of the proposal must be presented. C. The City will review the proposals and notify all proposers of the firms to be interviewed for final consideration by May 25, 1987. III. PROPOSAL CONTENT A. Title Page Show the RFP subject, the name of the proposer's firm, local address, telephone number, name of the contact person, and the date. B. Table of Contents Include a clear identification of the material by section and by page number. C. Letter of Transmittal Limit to one or two pages. 1. Briefly state the proposer's understanding of the scope•of work and make a positive commitment to perform the work. 27-40 1 2. State the all-inclusive fee for the work. 3. State the names of the persons who will be authorized to make representations for the proposer, their titles, addresses and telephone numbers. 4. State that the person signing the letter will be authorized to bind the proposer. D. Profile of the Proposer 1. State whether the firm is local, regional, national or international. 2. State the location of the office from which the work is to be done and the number of professional staff employed at that office. 3. The name, experience and qualifications of the person that will be responsible for the management and administration of a contract with the City. 4. The qualifications and resumes of the professional staff that will be assigned to the project. 5. The availability of the aforementioned staff. 6. Describe the range of activities performed by the local office. 7. Identify and describe any subcontractors that would be utilized in performing the scope of work prescribed, their names, addresses, and which phase they would execute. E. Proposer's Approach to the Project 1. The proposal should address each of the tasks outlined in the scope of work. The proposal should expand upon each item and set forth the firm's approach and ability to carry out each activity. 2. The proposer's approach to the project shall be set forth in the form of a comprehensive work plan including all costs associated with the major task categories and an estimate of time for the completion of each. 3. Every major task identified in the scope of work shall be considered an alternate to the project. The City reserves the right to choose a final scope of services from among these alternates. X21 2 F. Previous Solid Waste Planning Experience and Disclosure Statements 1. A list of previous municipal clients, projects, specific activities performed and the name of a person who may be contacted at the municipality. 2. A list of current municipal clients, projects in progress, specific activities being performed and the name of a person who may be contacted at the municipality. 3. A list of previous or current projects performed for the City of Eagan. G. Continuing Representation/Support Services The City may retain the selected firm to perform additional work arising out of the Study. H. Compensation 1. Fee Structure A budget summary and timeline succinctly restating the assertions made in the work plan, including a detail of all alternates, shall be provided. In addition, a standard schedule of fees, including hourly rates and other charges, shall be submitted as standard fees for any change orders or additions arising out of this project. The City shall compensate the firm on the basis of the approved fees and fee schedule per the proposal. 2. Payment Schedule The City shall pay for all services and items provided by the firm on a monthly progress basis, retaining ten percent of each billing to be paid as a lump sum upon completion of the project. Should the project terminate for any reason, the City shall be responsible only for that portion of the work satisfactorally completed. The proposal shall set forth all dates in the firm's account cycle for purposes of coordination with City's accounting procedures. IV. SCOPE OF WORK A. Assessment 1. Current Open Residential Hauling System a. Identify and quantify costs, limitations and impacts associated with the current open hauling system in Eagan. Such assessment to include: 3 ZZ.>-- 1) Identification and description of haulers and routes 2) Infrastructure costs 3) Environmental and aesthetic impacts 4) Survey of current local rates b. Identify and describe compatible residential recycling options 2. Alternative Collection Systems a. Identify and describe alternative collection systems 1) Sectorization based on current number of licensed haulers 2) Sectorization at fewer than the current number of licensed haulers 3) Single hauler contract organization 4) Modified open hauling system 5) Other b. Identify and quantify costs, limitations and impacts associated with alternative, collection systems. Such assessment to include: 1) Infrastructure costs 2) Environmental and aesthetic impacts 3) Estimated rate impacts including the potential for volume based fees 4) Relative costs to City 5) Social acceptability 6) Industry impacts including vendor availa- bility and impact on small business (haulers) 7) Legal issues including antitrust liability 8) Implementation issues including new entrants, bonding and community growth C. Identify and describe compatible residential recycling options for each 3. Identify and describe potential impacts of County waste management alternatives on each B. Analysis 1. Develop differential analyses comparing the current open hauling system with each of the collection alternatives described with reference to each of the costs, limitations and impacts defined in the assessment phase 2. Prepare matrices and diagrams necessary to graphically illustrate the major points of the analysis 223 4 C. Report Preparation 1. Prepare final report documents including all elements described above 2.. The report analysis and format shall be suitable for City determination of preferred alternatives. The City reserves the right to request vendor recommendations and a feasibility/implementation plan upon completion of this study V. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACT AWARD A. The City intends to award a contract to that proposer evaluated to be best qualified to perform the work for the City, cost and other factors considered. B. The proposals will be evaluated by a selection team. The team will rank the proposals and provide this information to the City Administrator. C. It is anticipated that two firms will be invited to an interview. The selection of these firms will be based upon the initial evaluation of the written proposals. D. Selection of the firm to provide transportation and traffic planning and engineering services to the City pursuant to this request shall be based upon the following criteria: 1. Responsiveness of the written proposal to the purpose and scope of work. 2. Reputation and qualifications of the firm and its principals to provide the requested services. 3. Price structure and related City costs for implementation of the proposal. E. Based upon the above considerations, the City Administrator will recommend to the City Council the selection of the firm judged to be the most responsive and responsible proposer. The actual selection of a firm and award of a contract will be made by the City Council. F. The City shall not be liable for any expenses incurred by the proposer including but not limited to expenses associated with the preparation of the proposal, attendance at interviews, preparation of a cost proposal or final contract negotiations. G. The City of Eagan reserves the right to reject any and all proposals or to request additional information from all proposers. ZZ / 5 7`" IV. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS A. Contract Negotiations Notwithstanding a contract award, the City reserves the right to negotiate the final terms and conditions of the contract to be executed. Should the City and the proposer to whom the contract is recommended to be awarded be unable to mutually agree upon the entire contract, the City reserves the right to discontinue negotiations, select another proposer or reject all of the proposals. Upon completion of negotiations agreeable to the City and proposer, a contract shall be executed. The firm and the City shall enter into a contract under the proposal for the duration of the preparation of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Continuing representations and support may continue beyond the contract on a retainer basis. B. Duration of Contract 1. If, for any reason, the firm selected is not able to commence services under its proposal within 30 days after its award, the City reserves the right to award the contract to the next most qualified firm. 2. If, for any reason, the firm shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner the obligations under the contract, the City shall reserve the right to terminate said contract by specifying the date of termination in a written notice to the firm at least thirty (30) calendar days before the termination date. In this event, the firm shall be entitled to just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorally completed. C. Contracting Ethics 1. No elected official or employee of the City who exercises any responsibilities in the review, approval or implementation of the proposal or contract shall participate in any decision which affects his or her direct or indirect personal or financial interest. 2. It is a breach of ethical standards for any person to offer, give or agree to give any City employee or Council person, or for any City employee or Council person to solicit, demand, accept, or agree to accept from another person or firm, a gratuity or an offer of employment whenever.a reasonably prudent person would conclude that such consideration was motivated by an individual, group or corporate desire to obtain 617-5 special, preferential, or more favorable treatment than is normally accorded to the general public. 3. The firm shall not assign any interest in this contract and shall not transfer any interest in the same without the prior written consent of the City. 4. The firm shall not accept any client or project which, by nature, places it in an ethical conflict with its representation of the City of Eagan during either the completion of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan or the firm's representation of the City as its traffic engineering consultant. 5. The City requires affirmative action, and therefore, the firm selected shall not discriminate under the contract against any person in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. VII. PROPOSAL CONTEXT - GENERAL INFORMATION A. City Organization The City of Eagan was incorporated in 1974 as a statutory, plan A city. It has a Council - Administrator form of government. The.City provides a full array of municipal services including water, sewer, and street lighting utilities; fire, police and civil defense protection; and general administrative functions. 1. City Council - The Eagan City Council is the final review and approval authority regarding all contracts, payments, plans, improvements, Policies, procedures and other business of the City. The City Council, composed of four members and the Mayor, is the legislative and policy making body of the City. The Mayor, who presides over the City Council meetings, is elected at large for a two year term. The Councilmembers are elected at large for four year terms. Set forth on the following table is certain information pertaining to the City Council. NAME TITLE TERM EXPIRES OCCUPATION Beatta Blomquist Mayor 12/31/87 Chemist Thomas Egan Councilmember 12/31/89 Attorney Vic Ellison James Smith Councilmember 12/31/89 Media Specialist Theodore Wachter Councilmember Councilmember 12/31/87 12/31/87 Insurance Agent Contractor 2. City Administrator - The City Administrator reviews and coordinates all matters coming before the City Council. He is responsible for the implementation of Council direction and the 7 ZZ6 B. C. D. coordination and management of City departments on a daily basis. 3. City Staff - The City Administrator implements Council direction through the department heads of eight City departments. For purposes of this proposal, the primary departments shall be Administration and Planning. The Administrative Assistant for Administration shall act as project manager and principal liaison to the proposing firms. Demographic Statistics The City of Eagan is among the fastest growing cities in Minnesota. Its dramatic population growth and the predominance of two income households places a significant demand on City services and facilities. A summary of the City's population growth is outlined in the following table. 1970 U.S. Census 10,398 1980 U.S. Census 20,700 1985 Special U.S. Census 30,456 1986 Metropolitan Council Estimate 35,311 1987 City Staff Estimate 3/1/87 41,700 Eagan's growth is expected to continue into the future due to its locational amenities and the current environment and pressures for household formation. Conservative estimates place the City's population over 50,000 by 1990. As a result of this mobility associated with in -migration the population is very young with a median age of twenty-eight and less than five percent of the population over sixty in 1985. The largest proportion of the City's population lies along its western and southern boundaries. Geographic Characteristics Eagan is located near the junction of the Minnesota and Mississippi Rivers roughly equidistant from the metropolitan downtowns. The City comprises 34 square miles of rolling terrain. The landforms typify the glacial formation known as "knob and kettle" topography. Such landforms vary substantially in scale across the community, impacting substantially the conditions for road construction, housing development and area drainage in different parts of the City. Consequently, elevation differences may result in either significant grades or significant costs to cut and fill. Hauling System The City of Eagan has an open hauling system comprised of 15 hauling firms which contract directly with individual homeowners. The firms are licensed by the 2218 City and must certify current insurance to be eligible. Ther are no additional requirements for licensure. The City has limited voluntary recycling programs and a municipal compost program. It has recently formed a Solid Waste Abatement Commission to make recommendations for a future solid waste strategy. These elements will be among the variables for the subject study. Zze 9 VIII. ATTACHMENTS PROPOSAL FOR ORGANIZED RESIDENTIAL REFUSE COLLECTION STUDY CONSULTING SERVICES CITY OF EAGAN Honorable City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Councilmembers: The undersigned, being thoroughly familiar with all requirements of the Request for Proposal (RFP) and the Scope of Services therein, hereby proposes to perform the work outlined in the accompanying RFP according to the following fee schedule. DATE FOR COMPLETION OF WORK (All Alternates): COST FOR PREPARATION OF WORK (All Alternates): If accepted by the City, this proposal together with the RFP, and qualified only by any attachments hereto, shall constitute the contract. Firm: Address: Signed: Title: Date: Z3o 11 Phone: Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS B. Public Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Contract 87-6, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, April 17, sealed bids were received for the installation of the trunk storm sewer outlets necessary to handle the storm sewer within the Pilot Knob Road upgrading. Enclosed on page Z is a tabulation of the bids received with a comparison to the cost estimate contained in the feasibility report. All bids will be reviewed for accuracy and a final recommendation will be made by the Public Works Director at the April 21 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 87-6 (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. ZS/ Our File No. 49380 CITY CONTRACT No. 87-6 PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN. MINNESOTA CONTRACTORS 1. Arcon Construction 2. Gammon Bros. 3. S.M. Hentges 4. Richard Knutson 5. S.J. Louis 6. Lametti & Sons 7. Nodland Associates 8. Northdale Constr. 9. Tri-State Drilling 10. Winter Construction 11. Ceca Utilities 12. L & C Rehbein 13. Ranger Construction 14. F.F. Jedlicki 15. Annandale Cont. 16. Lake Area Utilities 17. Waldor Pump 18. Orfei 6 Sons 19. Burschville Constr. 20. G.L. Contr. 21. 22. 23. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE----------- 3145e BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE:Thursday, April 16,_1987 ?ZZ— TOTAL BASE BID Z_9�9/.zS 2 6_y, /_92-c}3 5 Z �z 300, O(1 8. 4s tISET G. 72, ZEE, - 7e-9,00__ . 7, P5231 :8 b $238,000.00 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four Item 2. Contract 87-7, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lone Oak 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, April 17, sealed bids were received for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Lone Oak 2nd Addition (Northwest Airlines Flight Training Facility). Enclosed on page -� is a tabulation of the bids received showing a comparison to the estimate contained in the feasibility report. All submitted bids will be checked for their accuracy and a final recommendation will be made by the Public Works Director at the April 21 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 87-7 (Lone Oak 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. -Z33 Our File No. 49411 CITY CONTRACT NO. 87-7 LONE OAK 2nd ADDITION UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT No. 492 EAGAN, MINNESOTA CONTRACTORS Arcon Construction 2. Bituminous Roadways S Ceca Utilities 4. Encon Utilities 5. Gammon Bros. C67� S.M. Hentges Richard Knutson 8. S.J. Louis Constr. 9. Nodland Associates 10 Northdale Constr. 11. Preferred Paving 12. L & G Rehbein 13. Winter Constr. 14. Annandale Cont. 6). Lake Area Utility V6. F. F. Jedlicki 0 Orfei & Sons 18. Burschville Constr. 19. Rice Lake Cont. 20. G.L. Contr. 21. 22. 23. 24. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ Z37- 3144e BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Friday Aril 17 1987 $500,000.00 TOTAL BASE BID -463, 04 7.3 G � SS& Q{.40 .1 �� 4.x`9 9z4.4d 495- PSS78 57,979.76 $500,000.00 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-five Item 3. Contract 86-3, Final Acceptance (Ashbury Road - Streets and Utilities) --All construction has been completed for the installation of streets and utilities for Ashbury Road from Blackhawk Glen to Blue Cross Road. The City had received a certification from our consultant engineering firm that all construction was in compliance with City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department. This contract is now being presented to the Council for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERE ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 86-3 (Ashbury Road - Streets and Utilities) and accept the improvements for perpetual maintenance. Item 4. Contract 85-10, Final Acceptance (Birch Park Addition - Streets and Utilities) --All work association with the installation of streets and utilities in Denmark Avenue and Deerwood Drive within the Birch Park Addition has now been completed. The City has received a certification from our consulting engineering firm that all construction was in compliance with City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department. It is recommended for favorable Council action regarding acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 85-10 (Birch Park Addition - Streets and Utilities) and accept the improvements for perpetual maintenance. 73N J5 Agenda Information Memo April 21, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Six Item 5. Contract 86-11, Final Payment/Acceptance (Wyndham Corporate Center - Utilities) --We have received a request for final payment from our consulting engineering firm along with a certification of compliance with all City approved plans and specifications for the installation of utilities to service the Wyndham Corporate Center Addition and the proposed Williams and LaRue 2nd Addition. All final inspection verifications have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and staff is requesting favorable Council action regarding this request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the fourth and final pay request for Contract 86-11 (Wyndham Corporate Center - Utilities) to J.P. Norex Incorporated in the amount of $11,064.36 and accept the improvements for perpetual maintenance. 26