Loading...
03/17/1987 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING EALGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL MARCH 17, 1987 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III.p.(6:40 - PROCLAMATION - CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WEEK ( PROCLAMATION - DAFFODIL DAYS/AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY IVT 36:45 - DEPARTMENT BEAD BUSINESS V 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA ppp `f- A. Personnel Items B. Appointment to Technical Advisory Committee to Transportation Advisory Board �•/4 C. Project 491, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Eagan Hills Farms - Trunk Utilities and Streets) D. Project 494, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (East Wescott Road - Streets and Utilities) E. Project 495, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Dallas Development Second Addition/Kennebec Drive - Streets and Utilities) F. Project 496, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Brittany 10th Addition - Storm Sewer) P.lr G. Project 432, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing, (Royal Oak Circle) V,l7— H. Project 462, Receive Final -Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing, (Windtree 5th and 6th Additions) PrZ I. .Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (E. 300 ft. - 460 ft. of SE 1/4, See 26 - Water and Sanitary Sewer) T,(3 J. Vacate Right -of -Way, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing, Pinecrest Addition VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS P•1� A. Public Hearing for Project 487, Braun Court (Streets) (rj B. Public Hearing for Project 486, E -Z Air Park (Storm Sewer) C. Public Hearing for Project 493, Greensboro 2nd Addition (Streets f and Utilities) VII. OLD BUSINESS p.� A. Request by Resident to Consider Regulations for the Fencing of 1 Exposed Basements (continued from 2/17/87 meeting) B. Rezoning (Stone Bridge Planned Development - United Mortgage) from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single -Family) Planned Development and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 196 Lots on 96.45 Acres, South of Wescott Road and West of Dodd Road, N112 of Sec 24 n, g� C. Rezoning (Bridle Ridge Planned Development - Sienna Corporation) ( from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single -Family) Planned Development and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 143 Acres, South of Wescott Road and West of Dodd Road, N112 of See 24 p,113 D. Rezoning (Rockwoods Addition - Jane and Samuel Rockwood) from R-2 Within the Lexington South Planned Development to R-1 (Single - Family) and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of Two Lots on 5.4 Acres Abutting Oak Pond Hills Park on the East, North of Cliff Road, SE 1/4 of Sec 26 04 VIII. p.IZ6A. p.)Z� B. 156 C. /6/D. F T. 7-6q I. B. �.7,66 NEW BUSINESS Request (Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc) to Operate on Public Streets Within City of Eagan Rezoning (Stafford Place - Delta Development) from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single -Family), Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 192 Lots on 80 Acres Located Abutting County Road 30 on the South, East of Northview Elementary School, SE1/4 of Sec 23 Ordinance for Accessory Housing Waiver of Plat (BRAA, Inc) In Order to Shift the SE Property Line on Lot 6, Blk 2, Safari 3rd Add, 5' Further to the East to Correct a Utility Conflict with Setback Requirements in the SW1/4 See 32 Conditional Use Permit (Lehmans Garage, Inc) for a 20 -foot Tall Pylon Sign Located on Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park Along Seneca Road in the SW 1/4 of Sec 17 Conditional Use Permit (Blackhawk Plaza, Inc.) to Allow Gas Pumps and Service Bays on Separate Lots at the Blackhawk Plaza at the NE Intersection of Blackhawk and Diffley Roads in the SE1/4 of See 20 Preliminary Plat (Boulder Ridge - New American Homes) Consisting of 71 Townhouse Units on Approx 18 Acres Located in Part of NE 1/4 of Sec 28, South of Diffley Rd, East of Thomas Lake Rd Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment & Rezoning (Danbury Place Addition - Tri -Lane Properties) from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single -Family) and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 17 Lots on 5.5 Acres Surrounded by the Lexington Square Development South of Wescott Road and East of Lexington Avenue in the NW 1/4 of Sec 23 Rezoning (Woodlands Addition - Robert Engstrom Assoc) from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single -Family) and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 125 Lots on 73.2 Acres Abutting Wescott road on the South in the SE 1/4 of See 14 Rezoning (Sunrise Addition - Joseph Miller/Argus Dev, Inc) from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 70 Lots on 36 Acres Abutting Wescott Rd on the South in the SE 1/4 of Sec 14 ADDITIONAL ITEMS Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition, Preliminary Plat Consisting of 12 Townhouse Units on Approximately 4 Acres Located in Part of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 33, South of Cliff Rd and East of Johnny Cake Ridge Rd Public Improvement Contracts 1. Contract 87-6, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement (Pilot Knob - Trunk Storm Sewer) 2. Contract 87-5, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer & Lexington Hills - Sewer 3. Contract 87-7, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement (Lone Oak 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities) 4. Contract 87-10, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement (Nancy Circle - Streets) 5. County Contract 31-21, Approve Bids (Pilot Knob Road) for Bids for Bids Sanitary for Bids for Bids Plans/Order Advertisement for Z67 6. Contract 85-00, Final Acceptance (Lexington Square Phase II - Utility and Street Improvements) p26 C. Consider Method of Financing for Radio Communications System ,1 %6 D. Discussion Regarding E -Z Air Park IDS Permit Pp� I Z 7q E. Consider Refunding Certain Outstanding G.O. Bond Issues / X. VISITORS TO BE BEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) %I. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 12, 1987 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval is given to the March 17, 1987, agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the March 3, 1987, meeting and special minutes for the February 27th Joint Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and Council Meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: STATEWIDE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WEER Mayor Blomquist received a letter from Bill Escher, Executive Director of the Northern Dakota County Chambers of Commerce requesting that the City of Eagan proclaim the week of April 21 through April.25, 1.987 as Chamber of Commerce Week in Eagan. To quote Mr. Escher "we, as a Chamber, will be doing everything we can to publicize how our Chamber serves your city. We have been requested by the state organization to' ask you as Mayor, to proclaim the week of April 21 through 25 as Chamber of Commerce Week in Eagan." ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To proclaim April 21 through 25 as Chamber of Commerce Week in Eagan. AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY/DAFFODIL DAYS CELEBRATION The City has received a letter from a representative of the American Cancer Society requesting that the City of Eagan proclaim March 30 through April 5 as Daffodil Days to help support the American Cancer Society. Enclosed on page , is a copy of a letter from Connie Meduna representing the American Cancer Society proclaiming Daffodil Days. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To proclaim March 30 through April 5 as Annual Daffodil Days Celebration in the City of Eagan. January 15, 19$7 The American Cancer Society will bring a touch of spring to Eagan on March 30 - April 5, 1987, when it conducts its annual Daffodil Days celebration. The Society's fundraising event brings thousands of "flowers of hope" to our "Star City". Last year more than $3,000 was collected in Eagan. Money raised during Daffodil Days funds the Society's research, education and patient service programs. The key to the success of Daffodil Days is the contribution of many local businesses, schools and clubs who order LARGE QUANTITIES OF FLOWERS IN ADVANCE OF THE PUBLIC OFFERING.. The American Cancer Society volunteers will deliver the,daffodils to your company representative. The minimum advance order is 25 bouquets of 10 flowers; the suggested donation is $3.00 per bouquet. Promotional sales aides (posters, order forms) are available. You may place your order by calling Connie 452-2521 I hope you join your friends and neighbors in spreading a touch of spring during the Daffodil Days Celebration. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincer�ly, Connie Meduna v4rrnefticat1 0,0110evq-octeg Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Two A. CABLE: Item 1. Ralph Campbell, Cable Administrator for the Burnsville/Eagan Joint Cable Commission will be present to give a brief update on Commission business and respond to any questions City Councilmembers might have regarding cable. 3 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Three There are ten (10) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of these items in further detail, the item should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: Item 1. Part-time Police Dispatcher --In official action at the March 3, 1987 City Council meeting, Susan Diehl, was hired to fill the vacancy of part-time police dispatcher. On Friday, March 6, 1987, Ms. Diehl notified the City of Eagan that her husband has been transferred and she will not be able to accept this position. Therefore, it is necessary to advertise for and hire a new part-time police dispatcher. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge the notification that Susan Diehl will not be accepting the part-time police dispatcher position and to authorize the advertisement for a new part-time police dispatcher. Item 2. Police Officer --In the 1987 budget for the City of Eagan, an additional police officer position was approved to begin April 1, 1987. It is the recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe and Administrative Assistant Duffy that Brian Gunderson, currently a community service officer with the Eagan Police Department, be hired to fill this new police officer position. Mr. Gunderson meets all of the state requirements for a police officer and has successfully completed the City's requirements, such as the physical and psychological examinations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Brian Gunderson as a police officer for the Eagan Police Department, effective April 1, 1987. Item 3. Community Service Officer --The hiring of Brian Gunderson as a police officer, if approved by Council action, will create a vacancy for a community service officer. The City of Eagan, in the late fall of 1986, advertised the last community service officer opening. Approximately fifteen applications were received. Twenty- five applicants were subsequently interviewed. It is the recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe and Administrative Assistant Duffy that one of the top candidates from this group of applicants, James Thielen, be hired for the current community service officer opening. Mr. Thielen has successfully completed the City's physical examination requirement. Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Four ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of James Thielen as a community service officer for the Eagan Police Department, effective April 1, 1987. Item 4. Seasonal Street Maintenance Worker --The City of Eagan began advertising for seasonal maintenance workers at the beginning of March. After reviewing the applications received so far, and because of the unseasonably warm, snow -free winter, the superintendent of streets and equipment would like to hire one seasonal maintenance worker beginning March 18, 1987. The recommendation of Superintendent Erhart is that Keith Wallace be hired as a seasonal maintenance worker for the streets and equipment division beginning March 18, 1987. Money for this position is available in the 1987 budget. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Keith Wallace as a seasonal maintenance worker for the streets and equipment division, effective March 18, 1987. Item 5. Zoning Administrator Salary --A new position for a zoning administrator was approved in the 1987 budget for the planning department. Because this is a new position, the City Council will have to officially set the salary for this position. Because the City of Eagan is currently attempting to adjust salaries to the City's master compensation plan and this adjustment is phased in over the next one and one-half years, it will be necessary to establish a percentage of equity for this position at this time. This percentage adjustment is equitable because other employees are not at total equity at this point. The position of zoning administrator falls into the exempt salary Level H range. It is the recommendation of City Administrator Hedges and Administrative Assistant Duffy that the position of zoning administrator be established at eighty-five percent of total equity according to the City's compensation plan. This is the same percentage of total equity at which the new MIS coordinator position's salary was established. This would mean that the City would advertise an entry level salary ranging from $1,946 to $2,004 per month, depending upon experience. This is not the total salary range for the position, it is only a range for entry and the actual salary will be determined by the step level upon which the successful applicant will be placed according to education and experience. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve setting the salary for the new zoning administrator position in planning at eighty-five percent of total equity of the City's compensation plan. Therefore, the City would advertise an entry level range of $1,946 to $2,004 per month. Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Five APPOINTMENT TO TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO TRANSPORTATION TO TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD B. Appointment to Technical Advisory Committee to Transportation Advisory Board --Recently a letter was sent to the Technical Advisory Committee aviation subcommittee requesting that a member of the City of Eagan staff, Mr. Jon Hohenstein, be appointed to serve on that committee due to the variety of impacts that air commerce has on this community. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein has been attending TAC aviation subcommittee meetings to monitor their actions on behalf of the City of Eagan. At one time, John Voss, the City's consultant planner, was a member of the Technical Advisory Committee in some capacity which allowed Eagan to participate and monitor various actions pertaining to the airport. The City has received a response letter and apparently the chairman of TAC appoints all subcommittee membership, and that group is primarily either TAC members or representatives of various metropolitan. or state agencies. In order for the City of Eagan to gain a closer involvement in the workings of TAC, it would be necessary to recommend to the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, which appoints eight members of the TAC, that it is the desire of the City of Eagan to appoint Mr. Hohenstein to that committee. Presently there is no vacancy; however, a letter to the AMM would alert that organization to the City of Eagan's desire to have a member participate on TAC and, more specifically, on the TAC aviation subcommittee. A copy of the letter sent by the TAC chair, Mr. William ttensmann, cit engineer for Coon Rapids, is enclosed on pages -through ' ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To recommend to the AMM that Jon Hohenstein, administrative assistant, be considered for a vacancy/appointment to the Technical Advisory Committee. February 13, 1987 Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Subject: TAC - Aviation Committee Membership Dear Mr. Hedges: cy In your letter of February 6, 1987 you inquire into the possibi- lity of having a member of your staff, Mr. Jon Hohenstein, appointed to the TAC Aviation Subcommittee. You further point out that the City of Eagan has a particular interest in the Aviation Subcommittee due to profound impacts of air commerce on your community. Subcommittee membership is recommended by the subcommittee chairman and approved by the Technical Advisory Committee., While no specific number of members is mandated, the present Aviation Subcommittee is made up of twelve members, all of whom are TAC members or representatives of various Metropolitan or State agencies. Membership in the various TAC subcommittees was discussed by the Technical Advisory Committee approximately two years ago. The center of discussion was the possibility of expanding the mem- bership of the Aviation Subcommittee to include members from com- munities immediately surrounding the Metropolitan airports. As the Aviation Subcommittee deals with all airports throughout the Metropolitan area, it was_felt that if the subcommittee were to be expanded to include representatives of communities affected by airport operations, it would have to be expanded to include mem- bers of all communities surrounding any of the airports who wish to be represented on the committee. The conclusion of the TAC was that a member adjacent to one airport might not have an interest in other Metropolitan airports and therefore might be reluctant to participate in all meetings. In addition, there was a concern that if all interested communities were given an opportunity to appoint members, the committee would become too large and unwieldy. Therefore, the policy adopted was to not expand the subcommittee.but invite representatives of communities 7 1313 COON RAPIDS BOULEVARD, COON RAPIDS, MINNESOTA 55433-5397 (612) 755-2880 Thomas L. Hedges TAC - Aviation Committee Membership February 13, 1987 Page 2 who had an interest in specific matters being discussed by the subcommittee, to attend the subcommittee meeting. Those persons a attending the meetings would be given a reasonable opportunity to participate but would not be voting members of the subcommittee. Based upon this adopted policy, I could not recommend appointment of Mr. Hohenstein to the TAC Aviation Subcommittee. I would however invite him to attend meetings and I will give his name to the subcommittee chairman to insure that meeting notices are sent to him. Eight members of the TAC are appointed by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. You may wish to indicate to the AMM a desire to have a member of your community appointed to the TAC when a vacancy occurs. Attached for your information is a copy of the present membership of the TAC Aviation Subcommittee. Yours truly, William R. Ottensmann City Engineer WRO:car Attachment cc: Gordon Wagner O n cd ro t ro y O L U O h V d F d H L ti ro U F N G A v d u C 0 0 a a ro U L d 9 N B L d u O C ro d z m m N O co c a a N .0 co to m p ,o l0 O S of co to m h- to N in l0 l0 ,O •- N r• N dHl O, N O, 0, U, ,p co N N ,O 1 1 H NNR1mNN N?NN v � .01 '1 Ol O, a _ In r-^ U-�^ rom 1=0 N N r N N N Ol m N O n cd ro t ro y O L U O h V d F d H L ti ro U F N G A v d u C 0 0 a a ro U L d 9 N B L d u O C ro d z m m N a e ti t- ^ CO m a Lr% t- a O N O tp 6 C In NN t - t - N t�r•ONN o ON On UN ^ N t[1 N %0 tin f1 t0 W o 'I I f 1 i I 1 f 1 1 lT l0 l0 ,O •- N r• N dHl O, N O, 0, U, 1 1 I ti W In 10 N ^ H NNR1mNN N?NN v � a _ In r-^ U-�^ rom 1=0 In in at: a o Ln C en to Ntll to O tzo 111 co In Ln U, Ln tn US Lnz�j zz a. 00 en c 0 O m A. D. L a. ro. o .i ro In an Ito ^ 7 to 1 tn a. o v. a, to In Ill d In n a0i ai 2 yyyvy] 4J "eNN a q� to . •.• h, .i In OJ .i ^ O .-1 ' u CO N c) Y ro' ri ro. I N to N loe °•' a. a to to ul a. a 10 a N •- .^tet 'uvv .a 1 •'i > (�7 C7q_4W .a .J v 61 ai .-� .i W 41 y R1 N �• 4 L L x L EF-• a0 aa7 ro V u 2,, R7 u rou ^m O N -Ty E'. _ ro m LA W u s 0 N O F S O W L L C p L N aj F-4Ln C z N NSi• c9 td d .E (V m ?+ +uiati� B._0o o W W C�mN•- V L O .-• L ro O L O co. IO, uirNuvyuu a:NN 111 a:N W � Nooa �coN 0 �2 I _ F ro mej U'%t7C NmNN Q co o oto 1 d A U 7ro a enC F 4 O t„ v L � v .I O v II d O u .i 0 ri C ' H A. •Iba o C L �i C C a7 v ro A L L C .► of L O C C t+1 C ro A O d ro O ea+`4ao, A .-roi .ci A tcd a Lac L r+ ro ro aI L ro a Bey +ui ALO Law m cU d a o L. 0. .ct D, V 0.0 C 1. O ed -piip 43 0 amt N C L U C •• C �• O 0- 4 C Cd v U C v> 0 L +i t0 V L' t tL N W 7 4 Ori C 11 L B F S c of L L t: q eup tui 4 P. . 07 N 4N 0.C.Ui ya• n N ro A G 4 IbA > h 0 V c w U c °' C .4 ri C 0 C w L r A O U •. v G N H 41 AHF m L OO 0 L N ttl N t/] C O N -0C v C +i a v m O W ac toy ro A L an R7 S to 0 N o FAS b L C NL >, 01 ri U QI N L* r`gg ro ro rr'I C eo ed 0C L c b n B O Vz"a 04 V) CO -9 b4 Wp; L C r1 ro B ro F L ro vi O C zciW -a .33:a.4 02 �-1 O Aci u LriF 7 u F +At F l 0 QO >, L 0 S L T U W V ro b L %~ U O O LV 4 60 . p COU O y yy m o C C aq m �aCi;U � L T c /Cd NA X adf d 0 C -Cy Uri rl 0 -4 A O ed a. O m L a a c o a os°.cc L eL.lo>,L. ul x onj N oll .ya y �SF3 STac dUy O n cd ro t ro y O L U O h V d F d H L ti ro U F N G A v d u C 0 0 a a ro U L d 9 N B L d u O C ro d z N e ti t- ^ CO m a Lr% t- a O O tp 6 C In NN t - t - N t�r•ONN o ON On UN ^ N t[1 N %0 tin f1 t0 W o 'I I f 1 i I 1 f 1 1 lT 'C to ILn tom- K b W m d N--r`O cu t" m m 1 11 N ? t0 l0 ,O •- N r• N dHl O, N O, 0, U, 1 1 I ti W In 10 N ^ H NNR1mNN N?NN m to 0 arn (7, (v TmNO, O, In in Ln tn !Ll LA Ln tn Ln U) In en 00 en c 0 O ��' In •- ? In an Ito ^ 7 to 1 tn 111 .-I Lm1 111 0 to In Ill d In 7 7 ? n to � Ln Ln LA � 4J a tl^n to . •.• h, .i In OJ .i ^ O .-1 ' u CO N c) Y ro' ri ro. I N to N loe °•' a. a - e . I a. ul a. a 10 a on v to eo '{i a ° 'i cc oa a.0 ai; cvui mNitun„i c o atm °1 �wm ��+ cnoia•ai -a -v)i o .ri c o C .c 0 U'l ttd m• ul m m W L v0i j .0i .Cj V1 V u 2,, R7 u rou ^m rix C7 L Oq A. .-� .a%ta rd u _ ro m LA W u s 0 N O F ..-I >0,. z -4 ri N O O- O O OO '� ro LO Lam. g O LO. 4 L L roh >.ro �z F) Ov d C ro .pNproH 97 c0.m S. C ..0 roYQ W y t�`U t�+y,Ft7h V1 CA u m v p a UCE yF<VPI aOi N en m V L O .-• L ro O L O co. IO, uirNuvyuu L O W d '7 Oal t�aa0� LO. O A O 4 N i'-3 � a.EE � Nooa �coN 0 �2 t~. ro c-tn0 H o O00 0- N Nm N o N O O,O t- ? 9p�p 4Am- 0 0 O o aw 0 7 mej U'%t7C NmNN Q co o oto 1 ti n NR:�ry� UtnN i1 t„ o v � ri L A. u V rof. J ro A L L C .► of H C ea+`4ao, 41 m Lac L r+ ro ro aI L ro a c0 L Od $ m cU d a o L. 0. %.. .°, ...I L t; .� ed -piip 43 0 amt N C L O L L A. 4 C Cd v U O m 4 L' t tL N W 7 4 Ori C 11 L B F .'t a~. N L C �• W C O 4 P. . 07 N 4N 0.C.Ui C W> tcU LA H c O Oc 0 V c w U c °' C .4 ri C 0 C w L r trod rCd rn t% L.U S a H F O. A" f, r~ c ,-t >, .I o a 4 41 AHF m L OO 0 L N V0 t/] C O N -0C end N0 F 'O 14 O W ac toy ro A L an R7 S m >+ 4 a 4 3 N WL L O N C NL >, 01 ri U QI N L* r`gg ro ro rr'I C o Y ro r-1 Gl OCC U M Z v OYv Gl ;y� V eo ed 0C L c b n B O Vz"a 04 V) CO -9 b4 Wp; rt t. 7 U7> ed B c ro ro V e7 a'czty~ » zwan.Adj 02 �-1 O c 1 • j v< LriF 7 u F C V ro b L %~ U O O OC L aO. yy m o C C O0 yp UQ C Oa. y u Usi.5 , -5 : y A C C�y NA X adf O1u Lr1 0. A OO6O C G"'• �U.- l C,L O DAO 4°o aa _• om C' o m ° cI O ° "�O . uy uy Cu L a >.o c >,� L C 0 Ma. 0\n sU U�¢� r�a a 4 n C N \CI Urn, TU C.C�T r•m Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Six PROJECT 491/EAGAN_HILLS FARM C. Project 491, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing, Eagan Hills Farms - Trunk Utilities and Streets --In response to a petition submitted by a majority of the property owners involved in the overall Eagan Hills Farm development, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of trunk sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main and improvements to Northview Park Road and Elrene Road extensions. This feasibility report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal discussion of this proposed major project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 491 (Eagan Hills Farm - Trunk Utilities and Streets) and order a public hearing to be held for April 21, 1987. PROJECT 494/EAST WESCOTT ROAD D. Project 494, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing, East Wescott Road - Streets and Utilities --In response to a petition from the developers of the proposed Eagan Hills Farm development, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the extension of utilities and improvement of Wescott Road from the Highline Crossing (1/2 mile east of Lexington) to Dodd Road. This project will also be necessary to allow the development of the proposed new elementary school and the Woodlands and Sunrise single family developments. This report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public heating for formal discussion of the merits of this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 494 (East Wescott Road - Streets and Utilities) and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 21, 1987. /b Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Seven PROJECT 4951t RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT E. Project 495, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Dallas Development Second Addition/Kennebec Drive - Streets and Utilities -- Staff has received an application for development of the property in the SE 1/4 of Section 18, which lies east of Silver Bell Road, south of proposed Kennebec Drive and north of Trunk Highway 13. While this application is being processed through the APC at their March meeting to be considered by Council in April, the developer has requested the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements be tabulated. In addition to requesting the feasibility report, the developer is also requesting the simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specifications while guaranteeing all costs that may be incurred if the project is not ordered for installation at the time of the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 495, Dallas Development Second Addition/Kennebec Drive - Streets and Utilities and order the preparation of the feasibility report. PROJECT 496, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT F. Project 496, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Brittany 10th Addition - Storm Sewer) --Staff has received an application for storm sewer improvements to serve the proposed Brittany 10th Addition. The proposed development lies north of the existing Brittany 9th Addition and east of Beacon Hill. While this application is being processed through the APC at their March meeting to be considered by Council in April, the developer has requested the preparation of a feasibility report in which the cost of the storm sewer improvements be tabulated. Mr. Tollefson has guaranteed all costs associated with the preparation of this report if, for some reason, the project is not approved at the "time of formal public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 496, Brittany 10th Addition - Storm Sewer and order the preparation of the feasibility report. PROJECT 4321RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING G. Project 432, Receive Final Assessment Roll/order Public Hearing (Royal Oak Circle) --All costs associated with the installation of utility and street improvements to service Royal Oak Circle have been tabulated and the final assessment roll completed. This assessment roll is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 432 (Royal Oak Circle) and schedule the public hearing for April 21, 1987.// Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eight PROJECT 462 RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENTZORDER PUBLIC HEARING H. Project 462, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 5th and 6th Additions) --All costs associated with the installation of utility and street improvements to service Windtree 5th and 6th Additions have been tabulated and the final roll completed. This assessment roll is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 462 (Windtree 5th and 6th Additions) and schedule the public hearing for April 21, 1987. PROJECT 497, RECEIVE PETITION ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT I. Project 497, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (E. 300 Ft. - S. 460 ft. - SE 1/4 of Section 26 - Water and Sanitary Sewer) - Mr. Larry Billmeyer of 825 Cliff Road has petitioned the City to study the feasibility of water and sewer service to his property. Mr. Billmeyer is presently faced with the need for a new well. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 497, Water and Sanitary Sewer services and order the preparation of a feasibility report. Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Nine VACATE RIGHT OF WAY, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING J. Vacate Road Right -of -Way, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Crestridge Lane) --As a part of the final platting of the Pinecrest Development, the developer has requested a vacation of a portion of Crestridge Lane. All petition application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for Council authorization of the required public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and order a public hearing for April 21 to consider the vacation of a portion of Crestridge Lane. /3 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Ten PROJECT 487, BRAUN COURT - STREETS A. Public Hearing for Project 487, Braun Court - Streets --On February 17, the public hearing was open for consideration of constructing a cul-de-sac street with related additional utility services and minor storm sewer improvements between the Henry and Harvey Braun homesites. A neighborhood meeting had previously been held on January 16 with a majority of the affected property owners in putting together the details of the feasibility report. However, at the scheduled February 17 meeting, a representative of the Harvey Braun parcel could not attend the meeting and requested its continuance to March 17. The second neighborhood meeting was held on February 25 and a third meeting on March 10, to continue to work out some of the details regarding the total cooperative venture in this project. As a result of the March 10 neighborhood meeting, Paul Hauge, City Attorney, will be preparing a draft agreement between the affected property owners for their approval. A future neighborhood meeting will be rescheduled to work out the final details of this agreement. Due to the fact that this was a continued public hearing, no additional notification was published or mailed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public hearing for Project 487 (Braun Court) to the April 7th City Council meeting. Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eleven PROJECT 486, E -Z AIR PARK - STORM SEWER B. Public hearing for Project 486, E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer --This project has been continued from the February 3, February 17 and March 3 to this March 17 meeting. During the discussion of the February 17 hearing, the Council requested staff to investigate a fourth alternative regarding the location of a required pond on an adjacent triangular property owned by Villaume Industries Incorporated. A neighborhood meeting was held with the affected property owners to determine whether the land could be acquired for either the relocated pond or the expansion of the parking lot to provide the comparible number of parking stalls displaced by the development of a pond in its present temporary location. As a result of the neighborhood meeting, an addend m to the feasibility report is enclosed on pagesthrough for the Council's review and information. Enclose on pages through are comments from E -Z Air Park and Villaume Industries Inc. After continued in depth review of this proposed project, the potential negative impact of its deletion and the financial burden to the trunk system and the affected property owners through its approval, it is the Public Works Director's recommendation that this project be denied and installed at such a date as requested by affected property owners or required by significant drainage problems. If this is concurred with by the Council, it is recommended that E -Z Air Park prepay its proportionate fair share of the anticipated assessments to minimize their future objections. Further discussion of the alternates and their proposed merits will be provided on the continued hearing on March 17. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close/continue the public hearing and approve/modify/deny Project 486 (E -Z Air Park Storm Sewer) and if approved, authorize the prepartion of detailed plans and specifications. *This information was not available for distribution on Friday. It will be sent out with the Additional Information packet on Monday, March 16, 1987. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 March 12, 1987 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Attn: Mr. Mike Foertgch Re: E -Z Air Park Storm Project No. 486 File No. 49406 Dear Mike, O Engineers & Architects Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. Robert W. Rosen, P.E. Juseph C. Anderlik, Y.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner, P.E. James C. Olson, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keith A. Gordan, Y.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. Richard W. Foster. P.E. Robert G. SchunirM, P.E. Marvin L. Sorvalu, P.E. Donald C. Burgardt. P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson. P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. Robert R. P%eJjrrle, P.E. David O. Luskotu. P.E. Thomas W. Peterson, Y.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. Willis. P.E. James R. Muland, P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. Keith A. Bachmann. P.E. Murk R. Roljs, P.E. Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. Thomas E. Angus, P.E. Scott L. Young, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M'Olson Susan M. Eberlin On March 11, 1987, we met with Chuck Nolan and his son of E -Z Air Park and Nicholas Linsmayer and Jim Luzum of Villaume Ind. Inc. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss potential ponding on Villaume Ind. Inc. property and E -Z Air Park. In addition, prior to that meeting, I spoke with Loren Sultze at the Soo Line Railroad to discuss the extent of ponding that could be pro- vided on the railroad right-of-way. Presently, there exists 50' of right-of- way south of the existing tracks. It was felt by the Loren Sultze if the cut for the pond started 25' south of the tracks, this would be acceptable. How- ever, a detailed plan would have to be submitted for their review and approval prior to a permit or license agreement being issued whichever they deemed nec- essary. Obviously, E -Z Air Park and Villaume Ind, Inc, are reluctant to pro- vide any ponding because it restricts the future development of their property and the fact that the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan does not provide for any ponding in this area. In any event, assuming a 35' wide pond easement is dedicated from Villaume Ind. Inc. and E -Z Air Park for a distance of 900' along the tracks (500' from Villaume and 400' from E -Z Air Park) and assuming a depth of 4' results in a storage volume of 3.7 acre-feet. This amount of storage is adequate for a 2.5 year storm based on 50 cfs outflow for the entire drainage area south of the track. The 50 cfs outflow is approximately equal to the capacity of the ex- isting 3611 CMP beneath the tracks. A 100 year storm would require 7.5 acre- feet or an additional 50' from E -Z Air Park and Villaume Ind, Inc. The other concern relative to constructing a pond is where to dispose of the excess ma- terial which based on a pond of 3.7 acre-feet is 6,000 cu.yds. while 7.5 acre- feet is 12,100 cubic yards. The question was also raised as to the quality of the excavated material which if it is to be wasted on the site, would have to spread over E -Z Air Park's parking lot or Villaume's lumber yard or a combina- tion of both. It is questionable whether this material is good enough for this use. Page 1. 2455e IN 30 7ear 16 A®' nivefsary r City of Eagan Eagan, MN Re: File No. 49406 March 12, 1987 Attached is a drawing which shows the excavated pond based on 3.7 acre-feet and the proposed 24" pipe discharging from the McKee Addition into the pond. The 3.7 acre-feet pond which represents the volume required for a 2.5 year storm also represents approximately the amount of storage required for the difference in runoff generated from the commercial land based on it being de- veloped versus undeveloped for the area south of the tracks. Listed below is the estimated cost for this construction. 6,000 Cu.yds. Pond excavation (Material removed from site) @ $8.00/cu.yd. $ 48,000 350 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer @ $32.00/lin.ft. 11,200 1 Each CB MH @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 1 Each 24" RCP flared end w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 800 4 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 200 2.0 Acre Seed w/mulch, fertilizer @ $1,000.00/each 2,000 Total _ $ 63,200 +5% Contingencies 3,160 $ 66,360 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 19,910 TOTAL .............................................. $ 86,270 The total estimated project cost is $86,270. Costs not included are easement costs and any costs associated with working in railroad right-of-way. If it is desired to proceed in this manner, survey work and a detailed plan will have to be prepared to submit to the railroad for their review and ap- proval. In addition, easements will have to be obtained from Villaume Ind. Inc. and E -Z Air Park contingent on the railroad's commitment. Listed below is the amount of easement required from Villaume Ind. Inc. and E -Z Air Park based on a 3.7 acre-feet pond (2.5 year storm, 50 cfs outflow) and 7.5 acre-feet pond (100 year storm, 50 cfs outflow). E -Z Air Park Villaume Ind. Inc. Pond 0.7 ac -ft.) 14,000 sq.ft. 17,500 sq.ft. Pond (7.5 ac -ft.) 34,000 sq.ft. 42,500 sq.ft. The above easements assume 25' of the, railroad right-of-way can be utilized for ponding. If you have any questions, please contact thhs office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO,,ROSEN , ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li 2455e - Page 2. 17 r- 0 E - Z AIR PARK PROJECT No. 486 - ALTERNATE STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: JAN. 1986 Comm. 49406 KINO. 2 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twelve PROJECT 493, GREENSBORO 2ND ADDITION - STREETS AND UTILITIES C. Public Hearing for Project 493, Greensboro 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities --On February 17, the Council received a feasibility report for the extension of streets and utilities to allow the second phase development of the Greensboro Addition located north of Wescott Road and south of Carriage Hills Golf Course. A public hearing was scheduled for March 17, to formally discuss the benefits of this project. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. Enclosed on pages Iq through_ is a copy of the feasiblity report for the Counc' 1's informatio and review during this public hearing. Further discussion will be provided by the Public Works Director and consulting engineer regarding the details of this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing approve/deny Project 493 (Greensboro 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. /7 P REPORT FOR GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No, 493 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1987 FILE No. 49412 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 0 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 February 11, 1987 Honorable Mayor & Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Greensboro Second Addition Utility & Street Improvement Project No. 493 File No. 49412 Dear Mayor and Council: Otto G. Bonestroo, P.E. Robert W. Rusene, P.E. Joseph C. Andrdik, Y.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner. P.E. James C. Okun, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keith A. Gordon. Y.E. Thumus E. Noyes, P.E. Richard W. Foxier, P.E. Robert G. Schunichl, P.E. Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. Donald C. Burgardt. P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson. P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T.. Rautmann. P.E. Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E. David O. Luskuta. P.E. Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. Willis. P.E. James R. Maland, P. E. Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. Keith A. Bachmann, P.E. Murk R. RWs, P.E. Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. Thomas E. Angus, P.E. Scott L. Young, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pawelsky Harlan M. Olson Susan M. Eberlin Transmitted herewith is our report for Greensboro Second Addition, Project No. 493. This report covers sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer and street construction and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROQ, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas E. Angus TEA:li Approved Byi I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Profess -oval Engineer under the laws of thefistate. of Minnesota. r Mark W. Hanson Date: February 11, 1987 Reg. No. 14260 epartment of Public Works Date: 7' 1996e 2/ 30 Year Anniversary SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer and streets to serve Greensboro Second Addition. Greensboro Second Addition consists of the replatting of Outlot A, Greensboro Addition which is located on the north side of Wescott Road approximately 3/8 of a mile east of Lexington Avenue. The second addition includes 42 single family lots. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plan for the City of Eagan. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes constructing an 8" diameter PVC sanitary sewer within the streets of Greensboro Second Addition as shown on the attached drawing. The sanitary sewer will be constructed at a proper elevation to provide gravity service to the abutting lots. Also, it is proposed to construct the sewer to the north property line of the addition at a sufficient depth to serve the area to the north of the addition. The sani- tary sewer will connect to a manhole and an 8" stub at the ends of Greensboro Drive. Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a 6" diameter DIP water main within the streets of Greensboro Second Addition as shown on the attached drawing. The proper number of valves, hydrants, and fittings are also included in addition to providing a water main stub for future develop- ment to the north. The 6" diameter water main will connect to 6" stubs con- structed under. the previous Greensboro Addition and Wescott Road projects. Greensboro Second Addition is included in the intermediate pressure zone and willexperience static and residual (working) pressures of approximately 67 and 50 psi, respectively. Page 1. 1996e 7z— Services - Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed 15' beyond the street right -of -Way line. Sewer service lines are 4" diameter and water service lines are 1" diameter. Due to the configuration of the First Phase, one lot within the Second Addition received a service under the First Greensboro project. Storm Sewer - Storm sewer as proposed herein includes constructing both later- al and trunk storm sewers as shown on the attached drawing. Lateral storm sewers would consist of 12" and 15" RCP connections and outlets from catch basins into adjacent ponds and low areas. In addition, low areas along the north and west side of the development would be interconnected to allow storm water to flow from the areas into Pond JP -32. Trunk storm sewer as proposed would involve the construction of a 12" out- let for Pond JP -32 and control structure to limit outflow to 1 cfs. The out- let would connect to Pond JP -32A as recommended under Project No. 470 As a result of a recent study, Ponds JP -41, 46, 59, and 60 are proposed to outlet south into Pond JP -32. STREET: Street construction proposed herein includes a 32' wide street con- structed to 7 ton residential design thickness. Bituminous surfacing, sur- mountable concrete curb and gutter and restoration of the boulevard areas is also included. Based on conditions encountered under the First Phase of the Greensboro Addition, it is anticipated some subgrade correction of the soils will be required on the majority of the street. Page 2. 1996e �v3 AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA ASSESSMENT AREA SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Greensboro Addition, Outlot A Parcel 10-01400-010-50 (Golf Course) CONSTRUCTION AREA Greensboro Addition, Outlot A EASEMENTS AND PERMITS: No easements are required outside the proposed Greens- boro Second Addition. Therefore all easements within the plat will be ac- quired as part of the final plat approval process. A permit will be required from DNR to construct inlets and outlets for Pond JP -32 and from Williams Pipeline for utility crossings. COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized below: Sanitary Sewer Water Main $100,080 57,380 Services 38,180 Storm Sewer 106,270 Street 149,020 TOTAL ....................... $450,930 The total estimated project cost is $450,930 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. Page 3. 1996e w1j/' SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the cost of sanitary sewer equally to each lot with -a single assessment against Parcel 010-50 for required over - depth construction to serve the area north of the Addition. The overdepth construction is approximately 9 feet at the stub street to the north. Assess- ment for lateral benefit from the trunk sanitary sewer in Wescott Road is pending as part of Project No. 467, Wescott Road. Trunk area assessment was assessed as part of Project No. 433, Lexington Square 2nd Addition Trunk Sani- tary Sewer/Storm Sewer Improvements. WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess the total cost of water main equally to each lot. Lateral benefit from the proposed trunk water main in Wescott Road and trunk area assessment for water main is pending as part of Project No. 467, Wescott Road. SERVICES: It is proposed to assess the total cost of sanitary sewer and water services equally to each lot in Greensboro 2nd Addition. STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the cost of the storm sewer equally to each lot with a credit given for trunk storm sewer between Ponds JP -32 and JP -32A. The credit given would equal the cost of the line between Pond JP -32 and the manhole in Greensboro Drive across from Lot 5 and 6, Block 5. Trunk area storm sewer was assessed against 19.4 acres of Parcel 010-51, which is now Greensboro First and Second Additions, under Project No. 433. Trunk area storm sewer was not proposed to be assessed under the previous Greensboro Addition, Project No. 470. The total area of the Greensboro Addi- tion is 38.7 acres. Therefore, 19.3 acres are proposed to be assessed trunk area storm sewer under this project. Trunk area storm sewer assessment rate in effect at the time of this report is $0.053/s.f. Based on 19.3 acres, the 1996e Page 4. total proposed assessment is $44,560 which is proposed to be assessed equally to each lot. STREET: It is proposed to assess the total cost of street equally to each lot. An equivalent street assessment in accordance with Assessment Policy 86-3 for the upgrading of Wescott Road is pending as part of Project No. 467, Wescott Road. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance A. SANITARY SEWER Lateral $ 74,900 Lateral Assessment $100,080 $100,080 $100,080 -0- B. WATER MAIN Lateral $ 75,620 Lateral Assessment $ 75,620 $ 75.,620 $ 75,620 - 0 - C.- SERVICES Lateral $ 38,180 Lateral Assessment $ 38,180 $ 38,180 $ 38,180 - 0 - D. STORM SEWER Lateral $ 59,200 Trunk 47,070 Lateral Assessment $ 59,200 Trunk Assessment 44,560 $106,270 $103,760 -$ 2,510 E. STREET Lateral $149,020 Lateral Assessment $149,020 $149,020 $149,020 - 0 - TOTAL BALANCE ............ - $2,510 Page 5. 1996e -!o The anticipated project deficit of $2,510 is proposed to be financed from the major trunk storm sewer funds. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans & Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 6. 1996e z, February 17, 1987 March 17, 1987 April, 1987 May 1987 Fall 1988 Spring 1988 May 1989 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION PROJECT NO. 493 A. SANITARY SEWER 660 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer, 0'-10' dp. @ $12.00/lin.ft. $ 7,920 370 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer, 10'-20' dp. @ $16.00/lin.ft. 5,920 980 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer, 20'-25' dp. @ $25.00/lin.ft. 24,500 60 Lin.ft. 8" DIP Sanitary sewer, @ $16.00/lin.ft. 960 13 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 11,700 130 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/lin.ft. 9,100 41 Each 8" x 4" PVC wye @ $50.00/each 2,050 200 Lin.ft.. 4" Service riser @ $10.00/lin.ft. 2,000 30 Lin.ft. 8" DIP Outside drop section @ $150.00/lin.ft. 4,500 1 Each Connect 8" PVC to existing 8" PVC @ $200.00/each 200 1 Each Cut -in to existing MH @ $400.00/each 400 200 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,000 2,070 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,070 Total $ 73,320 +5% Contingencies 3,666 $ 76,986 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 23,094 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................. $100,080 1996e Page 7. 2 B. WATER MAIN 2,360 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main @ $13.00/lin.ft. 4 Each Hydrant @ $1,000.00/each 2 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $400.00/each 1,600 Lbs. Fittings in place @ $1.00/lb. I Each Salvage and reinstall plug @ $100.00/each 3 Each Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $500.00/each 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,360 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL WATER MAIN .................................. U Page 8. 1996e 2� $ 30,680 4,000 800 1,600 100 1,500 1,000 2,360 $ 42,040 2,100 $ 44,140 13,240 $ 57,380 C. SERVICES 1,650 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 9,900 1,630 Lin.ft. 1" Type "K" copper water service @ $7.00/lin.ft. 11,410 41 Each 1" Corporation stop @ $40.00/each 1,640 41 Each 1" Curb stop & box @ $70.00/each 2,870 50 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization @ $10.00/cu.yd. 500 1,650 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,650 Total $ 27,970 +5% Contingencies 1,399 $ 29,369 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 8,811 TOTAL SERVICES ..................................... $ 38,180 1996e Page 9. 2� D. STORM SEWER 200 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. $ 4,400 300 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer w/C1. B bedding, 20'-25' dp. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 9,000 220 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-20' dp. @ $25.00/lin.ft. 5,500 1,280 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp. @ $20.00/lin.ft. 25,600 5 Each Std. 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 4,750 7 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 6,300 31 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $65.00/lin.ft. 2,015 2 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/lin.ft. 1,600 1 Each Field Type CB w/cstg. @ $850.00/each 850 1 Each Control structure MH w/cstg. @ $3,000.00/each 3,000 1 Each 15" RCP flared end @ $400.00/lin.ft. 400 4 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $500.00/each 2,000 3 Each 12" RCP flared end @ $300.00/each 900 32 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $70.00/cu.yd. 2,240 300 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 3,000 1,800 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,800 3 Acres Seed w/3" topsoil, mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/ac. 4,500 Total $ 77,855 +5% Contingencies 3,892 $ 81,747 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 24,523 TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................. $106,270 Page 10. 1996e E. STREETS 3,000 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. $ 9,000 3,000 Cu.yds. Select Granular .borrow @ $6.50/cu.yd. 19,500 8,840 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $0.50/sq.yd. 4,420 3,210 Ton Cl. 5, Aggr. base, 100% crushed quarry rock @ $7.00/ton 22,470 670 Ton 2331 Bit. base course @ $11.00/ton 7,370 670 Ton 2341 Bit. wear course @ $13.00/ton 8,710 79 Ton Bit. Mat'l. for mixture @ $150.00/ton 11,850 370 Gals. Bit. Mat'l. for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 555 4,400 Lin.ft. Surmountable conc. C & G @ $5.00/lin.ft. 22,000 1,100 Lin.ft. Reinforcing for conc. C & G @ $0.50/lin.ft. 550 1 Each Salvage & reinstall permanent barricade @ $100.00/each 100 1 Each Adjust manhole @ $150.00/each 150 200 Cu.yds. Topsoil borrow @ $5.00/cu.yd. 1,000 1.0 Acres Seed w/3" topsoil, mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.00/Ac. 1,500 Total $109,175 +5y Contingencies 5,458 $114,633 +3O% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 34,387 TOTALSTREETS .................................... $149,020 Page 11. 1996e 3v APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION PROJECT NO. 493 A. SANITARY SEWER Parcel No. of Total Description Lots Cost/Lot Assessment GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION Lots 1-3, Block 1 3 $1,783 $ 5,350 Lots 1-4, Block 2 4 1,783 7,134 Lots 1-10, Block 3 10 1,783 17,833 Lots 1-10, Block 4 10 1,783 17,833 Lots 1-9, Block 5 9 1,783 16,050 Lots 1-6 , Block 6 6 1,783 10,700 Parcel 10-01400-010-50 (Golf Course) _ LUMP SUM $ 25,180 42 $100,080 B. WATER MAIN GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION Lots 1-3, Block 1 3 $1,366 $ 4,099 Lots 1-4, Block 2 4 1,366 5,465 Lots 1-10, Block 3 10 1,366 13,662 Lots 1-10, Block 4 10 1,366 13,662 Lots 1-9, Block 5 9 1,366 12,296 Lots 1-6, Block 6 6 1,366 8,196 42 $ 57,380 C. SERVICES GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION Lots 1-3, Block 1 3 $ 909 $ 2,727 Lots 1-4, Block 2 4 909 3,636 Lots 1-10, Block 3 10 909 9,090 Lots 1-10, Block 4 10 909 9,090 Lots 1-9, Block 5 9 909 8,182 Lots 1-6, Block 6 6 909 5,455 42 $ 38,180 1996e Page 12. 33 D. STORM SEWER Parcel No. of Total Description Lots Cost/Lot Assessment GREENSBORO SECOND'ADDITION Lateral Lots 1-3, Block 1 3 $1,410 $ 4,229 Lots 1-4, Block 2 4 1,410 5,638 Lots 1-10, Block 3 10 1,410 14,095 Lots 1-10, Block 4 10 1,410 14,095 Lots 1-9, Block 5 9 1,410 12,686 Lots 1-6, Block 6 6 1,410 8,457 42 $ 59,200 Trunk Lots 1 -3, -Block 1 3 $1,061 $ 3,183 Lots 1-4, Block 2 4 1,061 4,244 Lots 1-10, Block 3 10 1,061 10,610 Lots 1-10, Block 4 10 1,061 10,610 Lots 1-9, Block 5 9 1,061 9,548 Lots 1-6, Block 6 6 1,061 b,365 - 42 $ 44,560 E. STREETS GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION Lots 1-3, Block 1 3 $3,548 $ 10,644 Lots 1-4, Block 2 4 3,548 14,192 Lots 1-10, Block 3 10 3,548 35,481 Lots 1-10, Block 4 10 3,548 35,481 Lots 1-9, Block 5 9 3,548 31,933 Lots 1-6, Block 6 6 3,548 21,289 42 $149,020 1996e Page 13. 30 SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION PROJECT NO. 493 Parcel Sanitary Water Storm Sewer Total Description Sewer Main Services Lateral Trunk Street Assessment GREENSBORO ADDITION Lots 1-3, Block 1 $1,783 $1,366 $ 909 $1,410 $1,061 $3,548 $10,077 Lots 1-4, Block 2 $1,783 $1,366 $ 909 $1,410 $1,061 $3,548 $10,077 Lots 1-10, Block 3 $1,783 $1,366 $ 909 $1,410 $1,061 $3,548 $10,077 Lots 1-10, Block 4 $1,783 $1,366 $ 909 $1,410 $1,061 $3,548 $10,077 Lots 1-9, Block 5 $1,783 $1,366 $ 909 $1,410 $1,061 $3,548 $10,077 Lots 1-6, Block 6 $1,783 $1,366 $ 909 $1,410 $1,061 $3,548 $10,077 Parcel 10-01400-010-50 (Golf Course) $25,180 -- -- -- -- -- $25,180 Page 14. 1996e 36 i 010-s0 I PROPOSED 8" PVC OIO-90 SANITARY SEWER—' �/ yt, GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION SANITARY SEWER PROJECT No. 493 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 0 wd 2w Sad Graphic Scab In fees BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: FEB. 1987 Comm. 49412 Fig. NO. V' 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 PL 1I ASN SO ID 2 3 4 s s ® T . 9 8 1e. 9 ' 3 1 2 3 a 10 / A I JL CROi D r i 0-0-4, 9 s 4 50000 s l 2, \t� � � ` 010-91 W 1 3 � e la ,, 3 10 13 12 10 if, �y 01l � 2 050-53 4 J g O 3 3 f Z 3 FIR 5,' �, jp_ � � 2A , I 4 I 2� 2 a s 9 W W s K 6 ,�VESCOTT ROJ1D 9 W EXINMN AVENGE SQUARE I ■ 010-01 I LEXINGTON Ex. SANITARY SEWER GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION SANITARY SEWER PROJECT No. 493 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 0 wd 2w Sad Graphic Scab In fees BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: FEB. 1987 Comm. 49412 Fig. NO. 010-00 010-01 GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION WATER MAIN PROJECT No. 493 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 010-01 0 iod Pod sod GrapWc Scab in Fut BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: FEB. 1987 Comm. 49412 Fig. NO. 2 010-eo ao-81 GREENSBORO SECOND ADDITION STREETS PROJECT No. 493 EAGAN, MINNESOTA ao-a o wd ZW ,ted Graphic Scala in Feat BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: FEB. 1987 Comm. 49412 Fig. N O. 4 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen REQUEST FOR FENCING OF EXPOSED BASEMENTS A. Request by Resident to Consider Regulations for the Fencing of Exposed Basements --At the February 17, 1987 City Council meeting, Mr. Terry Bohling, who resides at 1059 Briar Creek Road and a neighbor appeared, suggesting that the City Council consider an ordinance that would require contractors and builders to fence all exposed basement units during construction. The City Council heard testimony from Mr. Bohling in addition to reviewing pictures of a specific instance whereby a basement was left exposed without any fencing, filled up with water and created an unsafe situation for his neighborhood. Staff preparation for the February 17 meeting, included a memo from Acting Chief Building Official Doug Reid, that outlined several provisions in the Minnesota State Building Code whereby cities can require that a builder or contractor secure an exposed basement if a certain period of time lapses whereby there is no construction activity or if the Building Department makes a determination that the exposed hole or basement is an attractive nuisance or presents a dangerous or unsafe condition to the neighborhood. After a review by the City Council, the matter was referred to the staff to further consider a proposed regulation that the City might consider at the March 17 meeting. The City staff under the direction of Acting Chief Building Official Reid held a meeting with Mr. Bohling, City Councilmember Wachter and the City Administrator on Thursday, March 12, 1987, to further discuss the issue and present a policy, a copy is attached on page _t[for consideration. The aforementioned policy provides a mechanism and a requirement that building inspectors enforce either section 203 or section 303 (D) of the Minnesota State Building Code which specifically addresses unsafe buildings, structures and exposed basement areas. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the adoption of a policy pertaining to the potential hazard of construction openings, specifically for residential strucutures throughout the City and further that the Building Inspections Department be required to enforce this policy. Note: If any member of the City Council requires pages 49 - 52 of the February 17 City Council packet which includes Mr. Bohling's letter and the memo from Dough Reid entitled "Fencing and Construction Sites", please contact this office and a copy will be made available with the Administrative Agenda. MEMO TO: 'TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DOUG REID, ACTING CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: MARCH 11, 1987 RE: RECOMMENDED POLICY CONCERNING POTENTIAL HAZARD OF CONSTRUCTION OPENINGS After considerable research into policies of other municipalities regarding the above, it is our recommendation that the City of Eagan continue the following policy: Individual citizen complaints will be taken and inspected by department staff within 24 hours, dependent upon the potential hazard. If an unsafe condition is observed by an inspector, either from a citizen complaint or upon his own inspection, the persons responsible for the structure will be contacted immediately and required to correct the hazard to the City's recommendations as per the Uniform Building Code. DR/js Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen STONE BRIDGE AND BRIDLE RIDGE PROPOSALS At the March 3, 1987 City Council meeting, specific direction was given to the staff and developers of the Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge proposals which is outlined in a memo from the City Ad 1 to the City Planner referenced as pages through The City Planner and City Administrator me with both developers on Monday, March 9, 1987 to review each point as outlined in the aforementioned memo. The developers have responded to the overall direction of the City Council and for a copy of some general comments as prepared by thq City Planner and the developer's repre- sentative, refer to paged through. For a review of the revisions and original reports, please continue on with items B and C of Old Business. 01 MEMO TO: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 4, 1987 SUBJECT: EAGAN HILLS FARMS PROJECT At the end of the City Council meeting on Tuesday, March 3, there was specific direction given to the staff and representatives of the Eagan Hills Farms development team regarding the revisions that are expected for review and consideration at the March 17 City Council meeting. The following is a summary of the direction given by the Council: 1. The development team should supply a large map that includes the entire 495 acres and illustrates by color streets, parkland, small lots, executive lots and any other information that you may determine as pertinent for Council review. The development team should also provide 8k" X 11" reductions that are colored for the City Council packet. In addition to these maps, there should be a transparency overlay on a large map and some small maps printed that show the actual parkland active and passive uses for the entire Eagan Hills Farms development. 2. There is concern by the City Council as to whether the streets should be 50' or 60' and, therefore, the developer should be aware that the Council is undecided at this time and there should be some specific arguments for 50' and consideration to amend the drawings to 60' if necessary. 3. The City Council is suggesting that the development team consider a PUD for the remaining phases that are left to develop after the Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge planned unit developments are approved. This would allow the City to tie down the future development and essentially accomplish a master plan for the entire 495 acres. There was a question raised as to whether MPCA would still trigger the EIS if the remaining portion is approved as a PUD at this time. 4. The City Council is concerned about the lot sizes and specifically directed the developers to return with 12,000 square foot lots and if there are any lots that cannot be developed at a size of 12,000 square feet or greater, there should be an explanation as to why those lots require a variance. 5. All outlots that were proposed with the Bridle Ridge. Addition, that are non park -related, should be omitted Y3 STAFF MEMO MARCH 4, 1987 PAGE TWO and the land area would then be incorporated as a part of the adjoining lots. It is important to carefully coordinate these issues and any other issues that you feel are pertinent to the development of the Eagan Hills Farms Addition and that all background informa- tion be available for distribution by Thursday noon, March 12. I would be happy to attend any meetings that you might schedule with either the Sienna Corporation or United Mortgage to further discuss these isses. City Administrator cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation TLH/kf 49 MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: MARCH 12, 1987 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON EAGAN HILL FARMS CONCEPT & THE PRELIMINARY PLATS OF STONE BRIDGE & BRIDLE RIDGE The following is a follow-up of your memorandum of March 4, 1987, regarding the above -referenced development plans. The first question dealt with the 495 acre concept plan. It was noted that the specific Planned Development included 388 acres, which excluded the Govern Trust as the parcel immediately to the west of the Eagan Hills Farms concept. A new exhibit will be prepared showing what the concept will include, specifically the streets, utilities and parks for the overall concept. Again, no density or land use other than what has been approved in the Comprehensive Guide is being requested for anything outside of the two preliminary plats, Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge Additions. Hopefully, this new exhibit will clarify what the concept is trying to illustrate in regard to the overall parks, streets and utilities for the Eagan Hills Farms area. Question 2 related to the 50' or 60' right-of-ways and the new standard for street design. The applicants are proposing to construct the internal streets with a 50' road right-of-way. The Developers Task Force and the Engineering Department have been working for the past several months to come up with a new street design criteria which may deviate from the existing street standards now in place in Chapter 13 of the City Code. Again, enclosed is a copy of the proposed revisions which have been reviewed by the City Engineering Department. Also enclosed is a matrix as to what street widths would be allowed in regard to the design of vehicle traffic lanes. Highlighted is the current standard of 32', however, the proposed standard would be 28' with parking only on one side. Hopefully, this matrix will give you a general idea as to the width of the street and what the change would entail. Again, this matrix is only for illustration purposes and staff will be able to address any specific questions regarding the new design standards proposed. In review of Question 3, the issue is to consider a PUD on the remainder of the area to be developed in order to tie down the future development. In review of this issue, staff looked at this possibility, but clearly wanted to stay out of the EIS criteria in regard to the threshold of dwelling units. The more you review and approve regarding densities or specific number of units, the more questionable the interpretation of the rules become in regard to thresholds for Environmental Impact Statement criteria. Clearly, the two developments, Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge, are under the threshold of an EIS, and the City will not approve any additional units outside of these two Planned Developments to be constructed. Questions arise when an additional Planned Development would be allowed approving additional units to be constructed would the accumulation of these dwelling units then exceed the threshold for an EIS. The clearest way to stay below the threshold would be not to enter into an additional Planned Development at this point in time. In review of the remainder of the property, the applicants have reviewed the master plans for streets and utilities. The overall design of the infrastructure in this area is at a density of 0-6 units per acre. Presently, the property is agriculturally zoned; the Comprehensive Guide Plan only designates a D-2 density and any specific change from the agricultural zoning would have be reviewed and approved by the City Council. Therefore, it appears that the maximum control of the remaining property still is in the hands of the City Council because the property is zoned agricultural and any change would require a rezoning to be approved by the City Council. Question 4 is in regard to each of the preliminary plats - Stone Bridge Planned Development and Bridle Ridge. Please find separate memos which review Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge for specific comments in regard to each of the development proposals. The last comment is in regard to the proposed outlots in the Bridle Ridge Addition. The revised plat eliminates the outlots of common interest except for the location of Elrene Road and Wescott Road. In this particular area, the applicants are proposing to dedicate a 125' half right-of-way to preserve the pine trees, topography and monumentation for the subdivision area. It would be the Planning Department's recommendation that an outlot and homeowners association be created to maintain this common area. The applicant's are proposing to dedicate this area to the City for common open space and long term maintenance would then be left for the City. This would be a new position of long term responsibility the City should think through. This would then take care of all of the private outlots. The remaining outlots are to be dedicated to the City for park purposes. If anyone has any questions or would like additional information on the above, please advise so that this information can be provided at the March 17 meeting. CV ---------- City Planner DCR/jj Enclosure 12- N fn -6 10 0 O IT Q r7.1 7. IE- 1= 0 7-- in , 10 v. '0 O N eq O o cr V Lq.= a rtQ 14 Ol LO f4 10 r4 MI GO rq I C Q, < E 1.4 O pW C494 v E CD 10 go 1-4 ID w CwOto o to 10 Q E 4D A u r Go ,a -6 10 0 O IT Q O O cr V a co Go T- V 1 1 > I tq W 1 01 W � U I f >> C C C C >. C >1 o7 rl Cd rl cd V) r1 rc 4.1 Cd u O ,4 N V 4 4 43 J.5 L A L J i► .0 2: .0 .z x 3 M 4.) X: :9 -H ..a' L LC LL H W d Z W W W In W L W Cl > +-1 W V] IQ V >, L W W W- Cl L O W O W L > .0 O +"1 W W W- L O W L > +1 W b rI W Cd 4.) Ln 4a L GI N cd N O 44 O O L N 43 t0 L O 0. L CO ^ V] r- O A V) 3 V V) N O M %0 Q OG V] t0 A 1= 43 v co cN 1 FH H H O co H HH +bo ~ ..7 d d.'t -cc Z O O O O •21 •21 df W +-1 r! �5 .��• •4�. z Z V] to V1 W V) to Vi E 0 7 co �' to •.4 Cu rl • W .0 b a1 0. O W t- N tl- tl- b F3 cd CO bo Hy O H H H F H H vv .. .. .. vv L. C C N 1- t-- ti W cd O rl 1 -A Ls� F H H H F H H J.► rl N cd to A O� Q• O+ O� Q` Q` O� H C O -14 H •-1 D W rl V L L to I � H W t0 �O 4O k0 l0 %0 In Ln Lr% LA L td to ,�L W v J D C> .. ... .... .� ... .... .. .. O b Cd W 0 rl C xcc: HCC CC O OO W Cb Cdr W O pp O O 00 O O co O O Ln 00 0 C C O C 3•'•1.0 W • 4 +4 W C •� LL U � ? %-- Co 00 00 CO CO M M In In M Ul% M lfl to Ln Cd C .c.) rl O j O 0bO m 3� Cd v >,oi9)ma CZ7 W C7 N In -tr rWl H W ,moi ++1 H Wo O O O O O In tf% Ln Ln O O O V t0 +� W O 43 t j.3Cr M M M M M M MM M M =r =r=' •r1 L. W 3 Atjv cOd a.0 v1 `C Ln � c 14 I CO O r- ON a% Coco CO o0 !- to to In W 0 .0 f-4r.Ln 0 cCd 0 CW. r4 �-I Cn In cn � � � In Cn In to Uf cn � .I? L C 3 H Vco ) on a O' O O 00 00 o o O O O '00 N W cd W .0 rl 1 ~1 wL' W i'.. to Wbo d ti %O t.- 00 m o ........ .W L W 4 cV N N r r0 N r N 1 1 11 J-3 W a oba.-1 •N Oy H O O C V] C .0 W .Cj 0 H r1 3 u W - clh N N N N N N N N N --T _-r =r =T C 0 >.�i,'Z •.T In .0 .-. H -4- � In 3 Cr d . V N W = Cfl W v n rl Wa .0- rO- Cb cd +i .0 9) cd N s+': .0 rl C\j w v - - - - ► - • - - N L. CG QD oD N ;3 t0 N � �o CO � N Cd .0 = O N N MN MM _-rM _-r _-r .7 Ln GL > C ib tE H X1) N tri ai .. O .0 0 v L. S. 7 0 w V a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o •• �- •r I r1 L o C In LA %0 In W c0 a0 t- CO CC) W b O rl +4 %0 O O V CO W W Cd CO O •- 1 L O C C1 C rr ol vl O O 0 cd•.01 04.).14 t) O O O � '0 Cd CL .0 CO O O o O 0 O O O 00 W 1 C0 4. O U> cn Cl r• O O cn 0 0 00 O W L W W W r M1 O In 1 O O •O O O V) ri �/ o r- r O to •• M ,C 1 43 43 C L W � O O O �- L11 � 43 W oo W L M� r o� r �oos°.L0ca A r 1 L W U O o0 cd Vi L 43 W C M 0 O Cd "07 0 pWp., V A •; C ,L' O r1 .0 rl + I C 5! C C O L p-1 4 r1 b b0 3 V 6O cd 3 b bo cd rl 1 cd Cd 43 "-1 FF++ 0 O W %_4 Q O W rl +1 O W %r-4'� ,�'. Eu O. 4 3 U .� 5C W .a x x �q C-d �J �. .... f O C1 r N M H r- N M .- •. NM cd .C1 O ...-..... C>r 3L9 vvvvvv tc C JAMES P. LARKIN ROBERT L. HOFFMAN JACK F. DALY D. KENNETH LINDGREN ANDREW W. DANIEL50N WENDELL R. ANDERSON GERALD H. FRIEDELL ROBERT B. WHITLOCK ALLAN E. MULLIGAN ROBERT J. HEN NESSEY RONALD R. FLETCHER JAMES C. ERICKSON EDWARD J. DRISCOLL JAMES P. MILEY GENEN. FULLER DAVID C. SELLERGREN RICHARD J. KEENAN JOHN D. FULL M ER ROBERT E. BOYLE FRANK I. HARVEY RICHARD A. FORSCHLER RICHARD A. NORDBYE CHARLES S. MODELL CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN JOHN R. BEAT IM LINDA H. FISHER THOMAS P. STOLTMAN STEVEN G. LEVIN FORREST O. NOWLIN MICHAEL C. JACKMAN JOHN E. DIEHL JONS. SWIERZEWSK1 THOMAS J. FLYNN JAMES P. OUINN TODD 1. FREEMAN STEPHEN B. SOLOMON PETER K. BECK JEROME H. KAHNKE March 13, 1987 Mayor Blomquist City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Eagan, Minnesota LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER 2000 PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 TELEPHONE (6121 835-3800 TELECOPIER(612) 835-5102 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE (6121338-6610 TELECOPIER 16121338-1002 REPLY TO Bloomington and City Council Members Road 55121 Re: Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge Planned Developments and Preliminary Plats Dear Mayor Blomquist and Council Members: SHERRILLOMAN KURETICH GERALD L. SECK THOMAS B. HUMPHREY. JR. DAVID J. PEAT JOHN B. LUNDOUIST MICHAEL T. MCKIM ANDREW J. MITCHELL JOHN A. COTTER KATHLEEN M. OATES BEATRICE A. ROTHWEILER PAUL B. PLUNKETT SUSAN R. BURNIGHT AMY DARR GRADY ALAN L. KI LDOW KATHLEEN M. PICOTTE NEWMAN LARRY A. KOCH PETER J. COYLE CATHERINE BARNETT WILSON - BETTY A. MORNINGSTAR JEFFREY C. ANDERSON DANIEL L. BOWLES JONATHON G. LANGE TODD M. VLATKOVICH TIMOTHY J. MCMANUS JILL I. FRIEDERS CRAIG A. PETERSON LISA A. GRAY GARY A. RENNEKE THOMAS H. WEAVER OF COUNSEL JOSEPH GITIS JOHN A. MCHUGH JAMES A. BALOGH -ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN After extensive analysis, meetings with your staff, and discussions about the directions you gave United Mortgage and Sienna Corporation on March 3, each has submitted revised planned developments and preliminary plats for your consideration. Comments and directions were provided by each of you and City Administrator Hedges prepared a memorandum detailing the City's objectives. The revised preliminary plats in the case of each applicant reflect the applicant's best efforts at meeting the directives of the City Council. Stone Bridge now consists of a development in which all of the lots are both 85 feet in width at the building set -back line and 12,000 square feet in total area, at a minimum. The area in the Southwest quadrant of the intersection of Dodd Road and Westcott Road has been platted into 9 residential lots and integrated into Stone Bridge. The original.platted area has been reduced by 6 lots. There are now a total of 202 lots. United Mortgage's Stone Bridge complies with all of the R-1 requirements and requests approval because of its adherence to those standards. There has been some relatively minimal negative impact on the land form associated with compliance with the R-1 standards, but United Mortgage has determined that it must comply in order to assure Spring, 1987, development. �9 LAAKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDoHEN, LTD. Mayor Blomquist and City Council Members March 13, 1987 Page 2 The street right-of-way and paved surface shown on both Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge is in compliance with the standards and criteria for streets recommended by the Developer's Task Force. The Developer's Task Force contained both elected, appointed and staff members of the City, including Mr. Colbert, Director of Public Works. For all streets, with the exception of the street paralleling the park in Stone Bridge, a 50 foot right-of-way, with a 28 foot paved surface, allowing parking only on one side is shown on the preliminary plats. This is exactly what the Developer's Task Force has recommended for Eagan local streets. We have attached to this letter additional information for the City Council in support of the functional integrity and advantages of such streets as they relate to Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge. Bridle Ridge planned development exhibits variety and creativity in its design. The revisions to Bridle Ridge relating to so-called "small" lots are dramatic. They are set forth below: Bridle Ridge March 3 Planned Development Gross Acres 123.6 Total lots 203 Gross Density 1.65 lots/acre Net Density (Net of R -O -W and 2.58 Park) Average Lot Size 16,880 Lots over 20,000 square feet 51 (25.1%) Lots less than 12,000 square feet 21 (10.3%) Lots less than 85 feet wide 55 (27%) Lots less than 85 feet and 12,000 square feet 8 (4%) March 17 Planned Development 123.6 acres 202 1.63 lots/acre 2.5 17,400 52 (25.7%) 6 (3.2%) 20 (9.9%) 3 (1%) Many hours have been spent analyzing the manner in which to meet City Council directives, protect the land form and substantial stands of trees, meet engineering considerations relative to utility systems and roadway alignment, and achieve the recommendations of the Park Committee for active and passive park areas. The revised Bridle Ridge Planned Development is the optimum balance among all those factors. It is the considered judgment of the engineering and urban design professionals for Sienna Corporation that substantial adverse impact on the land and the public interest would be the unfortunate byproduct of a mandated 85 foot width and 12,000 square feet for every lot in Bridle Ridge. �d LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGIAEN, LTD. Mayor Blomquist and City Council Members March 13, 1987 Page 3 Two other elements of the revised Bridle Ridge should be noted. First, all of the outlots for landscaped areas adjacent to public streets have been deleted and the lot lines for the abutting lots extended through the former outlots so that maintenance and payment of taxes is assured. Nevertheless, Sienna Corporation will be undertaking significant landscaping activities in the designated areas to enhance the appearance of Bridle Ridge, relying on the individual homeowners to maintain those landscaped areas over time. Second, an expanded right-of-way at the intersection of Elrene Road and Westcott Road is shown in Bridle Ridge. The substantial and attractive stand of pines on the East side of proposed Elrene Road is is a major public amenity. The best way to protect them from indiscriminate trimmming or cutting and assure their maintenance is to put them under the care of the City. Because of the grade change, the homeowners on the West end of the Surrey Woods Court cul-de-sac will have no interest in caring for those trees. Combined with the entrance monumentation to be installed at the outset by Sienna Corporation, public ownership and care of the pines will, over the long term, be of great benefit to the City. As to Bridle Ridge, in summary, the purpose and criteria for a planned development set forth in Section 11.20, Subd. 8 of the Eagan zoning ordinance are met. Bridle Ridge is proposed in an area guided D-2, 0-6 units/acre. It accomplishes a creative, varied and efficient use of the land in that Plan context. It adapts itself to the physical and aesthetic setting in a way which meets the public interest and is feasible for the developer. The minor deviations from standard 85 feet by 12,000 square feet R-1 requirements are necessary to achieve those purposes. Sienna Corporation, therefore, requests approval. Extensive large-scale analyses of City and neighborhood needs for parks, streets, utilities and environmental protection have preceded the design and submissions of Bridle Ridge and Stone Bridge applications. Master planning as to these critical components has been done for the City for over 400 acres in the City. Detailed park plans have been done by your staff and are available. Moreover, the developers have displayed to the Council their development concepts for the remainder of the land controlled by them. Typically, developers which undertake such efforts and expense ask for contractual commitments from the City in exchange. Here, the City is not being so asked for any area beyond Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge. As to all of the remaining area, the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan controls land use and development density; and, the land remains zoned agricultural. Essentially, the City received a great deal, but retains maximum control for those unplatted and unzoned area. Further LAAKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGAEN, LTD. Mayor Blomquist and City Council Members March 13, 1987 Paae 4 future submissions, land use and environmental analyses and Planning Commission and City Council decisions will govern and precede any further developments. On behalf of both United Mortgage and Sienna Corporation, we respectfully request approval of Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge. Sincerely, David C. Sellergren, for LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & L NDGR.N. Ltd. Men .AX5 � R , • Narrower streets are safer and attract higher quality housing, especially on larger lot subdivisions. We propose to work with City staff to define the most appropriate street standard for the various subdivisions to create continuity and maximize the aesthetic and harmonious layout for housing placement. We feel that narrower streets have many positive attributes that lend themselves to higher quality subdivisions. The narrower road is beneficial to the community from a road maintenance point -of -view, as well as maintaining attractive neighborhoods into the future.. Advantanes of Narrower Street Reduce car speeds through design rather than signage. Create an aesthetically pleasing environment more in scale with pedestrians and less dominated by automobiles. * Emphasize character, security, privacy, and safety, not speed. Develop a sense of identity and. neighborhood. * Provide adequate, not excessive, provisions for emergency access and snow storage. Less land consumed by impervious surfaces - reduces runoff - encourages natural percolation * Land is utilized in usable open: space • rather than pavement. * Reduced costs in road installation and maintenance will benefit resident and City budgets. Narrower streets integrate into the natural terrain more easily and require less grading. �3 V V un O O A vt O O I vl O 1 O 0 O O O 0 0 N �s 0O t- Cl H 3c Fin (OD m m w w L° P1 W O O 0o co -4 coo (7%43% r. LA) N -r O -M W 00 00 F.• 0 1.n 1n ..... �..., n Q W . . . ell Lr .. �. .. 0 m m 1�+ N n rt r µv CL w rrr w 0) 1•'� w w oa I B cr 1 0 a a X a• w F+ m LJ 13 Cn 0 w E B B B G 4 W O C w cr0s W a 0 W "3 F•+ V 00 00 G r (D G cr w m r 0 0 00 00 00 (D cr r'•0, (D O• W -+ 10 un V "3 m 00 m cr cr rn all V V O+ V m 7 a Cr cr I 9 v7 •• O m W w o 11 (a 1-4 O m m .. "I " O 0 0 O cr 1--k m 000 O N cr •a N 0. E to -m W -m z crwcr0 F& 0) 0 13 m m 'I m ° � H H m m � o aom(Ga� • --r F+ 1: 3 a W] O 13 1 -+ 0 00 b o W 1+ W 0 W F+• F. O G. m W F+ N F+ W ? cr 4.4 a 0s0 a m a l --s :Ea w m W 1 m m m '3 cr cr 0 I ((D w G ►'F B m m (x 'O3 N ces+• f~ r FDz < (D V1 r O G 0) N 00 N N w W cr W o '1 H C - cr r m r• (D un (D 7 N E W G r+ t- cr v un O W r r r N cr $ O c* m a a a O O cr G cr m cr09 1 I 1 .o oo 4 a% w m a vvvv W a m r cr "S w m w o 0 0 CD fn H :4 a "3 cr C W a F+ a m to vn tin cr CL w A. o - c° 0) r %0 0% Cr O. � O � 0 (D %n v -0F � �a crc 300 ob a w G le a m _.ms rr r crrn r° 0 cr a% a o0 0 r wm •-3r xvt m IV m �r•Bw oa wGa 0w a a� cr o 0 rL 2:� 3 0 v, m Cr w a. a cr m o o 0 a F- G m w a o cr r7 7c• W PF 's F+• O cr a 0 A a � H N H Fes+• (a %0cr t3 04 0o w 9 a v v v w m •° Cr w V V un O O A vt O O I vl O 1 O 0 O O O 0 0 N �s 0O t- Cl H 3c Fin (OD m m w w L° P1 W O O 0o co -4 coo (7%43% In o% LA) N -r O -M W 00 00 F.• 0 1.n 1n Vn un w Vn vn 1.n cr 11 m 0 w m 1�+ N n OO r oq CL OD N : Q. O w 0 LA) 0 LJ 13 Cn 1 V V un O O A vt O O I vl O 1 O 0 O O O 0 0 N �s 0O t- Cl H 3c Fin (OD m m w w L° P1 W O O 0o co -4 coo (7%43% In o% %n v, rn o 00 00 00 0 0 1.n 1n Vn un vl Vn Vn vn 1.n cr 11 r r W r W W N W N N OO r 0% r N a% OD N co OD 0 LA) 0 LJ N N N N N N N N N t^ I� H � N v H MM to C] •C VA, py r x�w n I V13 rA fal [A w H x f] 4 0 rr" t1 x Dr a N O -+ N N N 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 1.n 1n Vn un vl Vn Vn vn 1.n zn rn co co o °O 00 co %n %D w H H 0 LA) 0 LJ %.n Cn %.nvwi 0 o 0 a W a - W w W W 00 00 03 OD co r 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 %n V un V %-n %-n V V rn 01 V V rn all V V O+ V rn V " o cr N W m I %01.0 0) m W w o 11 (a 1-4 O H H '1 '-C m 1-4 O 13 cr 1--k m cr -4 -m cr.4 - - to -m a e W -m z H a 13 m m 'I m H H H H m m � H • -4 F+ 1: 3 x cr X cr v cr "3 1: x cr cr t^ I� H � N v H MM to C] •C VA, py r x�w n I V13 rA fal [A w H x f] 4 0 rr" t1 x Dr a cn ca CA cA CA cA Cn a z z z 2: �• a r Fes• m R• R-R* O O O O H O w H H N C 09 H H H H a W a - acr UJ wC7 O1 CO w UM w ONW CL 3: En O-+c/n m 11 'a m '1 On cr m '1 O O " o cr N W m I in cr 0) m W w o 11 (a 1-4 O O M O 11 '1 '-C m 1-4 O 13 cr 1--k m cr -4 -m cr.4 - - to -m a e W -m z a 13 m m 'I m m m W CA C7 m m m � µ . • - F+ i 3 cr F+ 1: 3 x cr X cr v cr "3 1: x cr cr b o W 1+ W 0 W F+• F+ N• W W F+ N F+ W ? cr 4.4 a a a m a l \ m W 1 m m l I ((D t^ I� H � N v H MM to C] •C VA, py r x�w n I V13 rA fal [A w H x f] 4 0 rr" t1 x Dr D��a Roo =n I CD mH' I I N (D c a O Cn o3a (D r < �.n Q p O y Cn O �_ O O7 0 Cn r\ ^ O m 7 J, (DI `/. (D• W C(D (D Q �^ (D O Cn V I D N rn 0 0 a CD v d Cb CD w N O (=D �• D 0 7 E Cl) C 3 a C c CD (DU (NCD W m CD CD Q Q m m N W 3_ 0 W -, (D O P-3. Cn. O -o N O N CD O O cfl < m m 3� c 3 O- o (n c o in c m (ice 0 p CD 3 m o o W =o o 0-- O ».o CO o CD CD < CD N O CL cn Q p m p O O Q O O CID ((D 50 - m � N O (D '� O CSD � Cin O j (D W m (D 00 O (D CD O CSW O Q .. O (D —" 0 3 O m C O' (D (a Cr X W to CD (D W (D 3 W 7 Q O 0 m W O m m0 (D W CD CD CD W 0 Cy- (A cn Q< Tm _o ma -. � 3 < C m = � C 7: 0 -O O (Q CCD Fn_ - w n < eo = 3 cn a' p W < < ,� c w5 (m =r ::r m cn aim � O CD - 10 0— ?:3 3 CD o O,3_ m N c 3 o N 3 m In CD m 0 -- Q v, 3m nmCD w CD W Q_ nCD Q p Q -o Q. 00 C p o m 0 j Q O W W W cn �' o- c aD 3 0 ZI 0 m N p m W 5 cn p CCD'- o�cQ 5 o DCD wm No.n-' Qo3 Nrn(nmv,Wn �m -s cmn � —p c W m m 3 m �0 m w m rG m 3. CCD .N-. CCD _((n (D '� 0 Q: vmi � (D (Q O am7 n? w N 00 w < = W (n Q m O � � 0 � ' � (D l< CD m 0 M=r CD 0 :3 :Q SD Q W CO W D W 0 W 0 O m O O 0 D m 9 0 D 7 of CD Cn CD � '" 3< C CD 0 m 0 m N CD C) X 7 7 N 3� CS co En CD CD _ CD m m W Q p 0m 0) 0CDCr mM CD mm CDC m ?w0CDO � oCDW¢' i O < W 0 CD wCO o c -D w oD —=y CD ° o :3 i m CO o N - 3-0 p� (`<n vac-,(� Q om". 7 N W O O QO r. N 0 Co`<W O Q— Q W (D p rn O o m. < 0 -0 O co o o`<n �m 3 (D `< o p Dm W C) -0 WCD m CDO m cn O �< Q CD I D 0 Cn W m p ccn (fl CD CD CD a� u'7 �< c"cQ g W o 0 0.Q� EEnCD � Cn o °' g o o° m CD m •p < < (n (D O O W a' W W n w m W Q m 0 m' (<D N Q -O m (0 7 cn W W n o CA) n o 3 w o 0 3 m 3 --cD CD —fn <— m 3� 0-)(0 - x• __ m m O CD m • m °' 0. cn 0 m c (nom > > O m 3 < p 3. y 3 c, -= (-D o =rcn � o 0 CD < m 0 CD v p- W m 3 cn < o vi — (Cp = W C O cn O Q CD 7 7 W _ 3 w� 0 D 0 ::E :3 (o W °' Q c'.� p W v o o O CD S m 0 m 0 (0 Q m cr W 0 0 CDwQ m303CD�_.� w°3 pm 0cEnm(Oa0 o0D 3 m v> (1 O: p cn m (D 0 (D C 0 1 (D vi C m O Q C N C =(0 O < W O zr cr D 7 n -O Cn C7 co OCl) I C) 7 W CL (D CDD CD CD c0 CD W I W O CD O `< °' W o O (D (D (D CD Q3 CL (D m= cn m Qw3 W 3 p 3 CD 77 3 0 v, N mCr(D 7 m (0 C to p n 3 m (D 7= CD m 7 QCD W CD N O m N 0 (n O• O O O CA O (0 Q W C) C Cto 5CD m m 0 0 j y 7 Q m W CDD Q Z Cn CD 7 7 0 (O -- `< o Q CD W— 7 m- O d vmi w CD to Ci w m 0� O C � N N CD �? O Q '` W X 1 �(Dc W o D 0 3 3 w �< wo (Dg y 0 3 p g-0 < D o w n(a rvg D . (/� 7 (n O- (O Co= CD A a 00 (gyp 7 Zr N - w 7- w 7 N N 0 O 7-.0 O A -. O N CD `� OS ,O w -- (D 3 0 5 -O cD N CO :T O ff_ N ,�' O (n m D (D O p C A LL m 7 w 3 w m m A (O O a 7 m Co (D O O to - 0 3 w A p O CD (n (n CD '•- O D � — w (D m o w vi (n (n O O 3 3 3• � — O ww<00o m -o03 �ocr m�ccDD� -0wC—L'c- ' �°'(Dpfl'(D�'30 u=i n t0CD W CD �. N Cl) o I C (D `G m 7 i F' m w CDCL m C CD w (Oi> w 6 O (D cD 0= `< --0 C O w 70 -' N O 3 O N O a A Q A O -O U 0 0 3 w 7 C. o O � N w j a w w O p (p O w woo (�j m A O w w 0 3(o 0 (<D C) (D 0 -0 m � 6 0 (D (<D cD m (n `< O O (<D < 3cD 0 3 o = 0 (D -o Oj (<D (� m o_ 3 w 3= p, (n (n o m g (n 3 -ice 0 3 3 v0 m m m 3 0 CD O y m A m- x' C Q. 0 p w `< (D S� 0 a `C o m c A� -' O m < 3 Ami o CD - 0 v, 3 o c�:g � o aw CO �cQ o o ao ' N coQ� � a� o � o - (D O (n (n - C7 (D �- Q i A w n w cD o m- w a m (cD (QD cn D< Cr n (D _- �; (n 0 N. O 7 m a m o T (D A m cn `< °' S -O � A m (D O S 3 CD O (ND C' a Q fll 3.0 p m A m 3 vyi A 30 (n < 6 `L 3= 0 w A o a? O (n w 0 A �. Q (w' -D (Op O Q. m- (<D v 0 a 3- O �. (In a CL m O m CD C N m y -- � cD O N a)D c� m m3 Q -- c 0� co�m a (n ((°n o �, 3 cn o _3 3 a� <w o �' 3� CD (D Q(D n, 3 nl< .+ � < (CD = o w r. -0 w ? C O C (D � � (D T\) - (o �wc- j - 7 - (D O p vi o w w o� a� Q�co �� m Co 3 N E' sm ivD� m m m v (" a3 m �c w o c ci o U) a 0 0 0 (° a (D = w N a Q j y D o O? m 0 (C N O p N(D m w 3�CD ow�uwi° -0o-w0 mww c c_m0N ��o' wo m =1 < ooCD�� m �� mc��Dviw�cQ5 m0 p m (n w A o ^. D (n I T (D p C: Q(D m o o O g C w 0 D v rn Q ?CD O O n ni � o? 7 CD 7 Q CO A m (a.. ((DD << (mD (D N p `< 0 10 < w- a_ O CD m a m w p m (D cD 3 3 w m a3 0 m Qa(n ci U' *-p -� m co (n w 0(n O. a- w (D =• '' (n m w x cD m m 0 m w su M w co m CD < A aa'� �� c c (" p m �.(Do c <-o A (n(0 o-< �< m o uNi A o O Q< (p A (n = 0 CO 3 Q A w w= (D o C w m O o CD pi O N O (D O w A 3 O w m cD O (D Co 7 (D C C a Cl. o -.3 CD D o m QO -O 0.a-p(n o 0. = 3-0 cam co p -` m (D a� a c< w __00 -- w A aw a mw Q 0m o_ -A O O m < OinM 3p-0,�'O < CD (a A m c o o m w c o'o vai 3 3 <cr �'0 -•o ((n o m 3 o m 0v' 0CD-3ou)=$ cD 0 wQ"'c3.mm° =3 CDv3ioa�m��n. 3�o O 3 -« m (D 0_ ¢' 7 0 -' m "'< 1-0 - w ch 0 w . W_ CD m 0 cQ -O `G w � ((D = m a m O cn CCD CD O m 3 O m 7 CD -0 l< a m m m `G CT c CD A -- A 3 m w cn 0_ aca0 vi w o S. m 3 0 CD Q' w a=, 0 0 Cl) sm 0� 3 � w a.3 (D` m � �m w cr `CW (- 0. O o< -` N 7 0 7',< � a C m CI- O �• (O m O g (CD °' w� CD I agm .� A� °w Emcno C: CL o c m Qo v 3 �(D 0'w o m m cnm p m 0-� (n -< -0 (D (D 7 3 cD (p C O (D : (CD 2 m (n - O cn a m ^ A m O m A C " A A o m m O N0o��0g•�Cm<o0mw=coa>j���o- CD m m Q� m 0 Q.CD 0 � ((1)-0 �o cro o;.� v �m m -0 0 ' cp m cD S n m 7 m (n. co A, m N' Q o W (D .. m w w Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen REZONING PRELIMINARY PLAT STONE BRIDGE ADDITION B. Rezoning from A to R-1 Planned Development and a Preliminary Plat Entitled Stone Bridge Addition --A public hearing was held by the APC at their February 24 meeting, to consider the rezoning and preliminary plat of Stone Bridge Addition and their recommendation to consider approval of the rezoning from A to R-1 Planned Development and denial of the preliminary plat was considered by the City Council at the March 3, 1987 meeting. There were a number of questions raised by the City Council pertaining to a proposed outlot that was identified for future commercial development and a request that all lots conform to the 12,000 square foot minimum standards. There were other concerns outlined by the City Council which have been addressed in previous pages by the City Administrator for your review. The developer has responded by redrawing the subdivision and copies of the new maps are enclosed without page number. For a copy of the revised staff report which includes a recommenda- tion by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and a copy of the February 24 APC minutes and the City Council minutes of March 3, 1987, refer to pages through. It should be noted that a planned development zoning would not be required due to the fact Stone Bridge now complies with an R-1 zoning classification. However, to change the type of zoning would require new public hearing before the Advisory .Planning Commission and a major delay for this project. Therefore, it is suggested that the R-1 Planned Development zoning classification remain even though the zoning does comply with the R-1 zoning classification. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny: 1. the rezoning from A to R-1 Planned Development and 2. the preliminary plat entitled Stone Bridge Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT STONE BRIDGE APPLICANT: UNITED MORTGAGE COMPANY LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SOUTH OF WESCOTT RD, WEST OF DODD RD, SECTION 24 A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1987 REVISED: MARCH 13, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: The application submitted is a request to rezone from a (Agricultural) to R-1 (Planned Development), consisting of approximately 96.45 acres and containing 202 single family lots which are now proposed to meet the 85 foot lot width requirement and minimum 12,000 square feet. The applicants have revised the very northeast corner of the site to layout single .family lots vs. proposing neighborhood business/commercial uses as originally proposed. ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently the parcel is zoned A (Agricultural). The Comprehensive Guide designates, the parcel as D-2, a mixed residential with a density of 0 - 6 dwelling units per acre. As stated above, the applicants have withdrawn the commercial use in the northeast corner of the plat. COMMENTS: The proposed development consists of 96.5 acres in a lineal parcel following the Dodd Road alignment. This development will abut many of the exceptions for existing homesites which are presently located on Dodd Road. This proposed development will access onto Dodd Road, proposed in three different locations of which two have full right-of-way to Dodd Road. One access would require additional right-of-way to be acquired either by the developer or the City to make this connection. The revised preliminary plat consists of 202 single' family lots. The smallest lot is 12,090 square feet and the largest lot is 45,413 square feet and all lots will meet the 85 foot lot width at the 30 foot setback. The only comment regarding the preliminary plat is that the applicants are proposing to have side setbacks on public right-of-way of 20 feet vs. 30 feet required in an R-1 district. Other than this request for setback, the applicants have met the new street design standards regarding right-of-ways of 50 feet for interior connecting streets and 60 feet for collector or interior looping streets. C M GRADING/ DRAINAGE: This development incorporates very rolling topography with elevation differentials of 50' on the north end and up to 70' on the southern portion of this development resulting in substantial cuts and fills incorporated into the overall site grading of this development.. The grading plan does not incorporate any of the proposed parkland dedication, which will create considerable difficulties in the future in trying to develop this into active parkland in accordance with the overall Planned Unit Development dedication concept. The detailed grading plan submitted maintains the required 3:1 side slopes and maximum 8.0% street grades properly minimized at the approach to intersections. With the exception of the grading of the Elrene Road connection with Dodd Road, the -cut and fill slopes onto adjacent private property has been minimized. This development shall provide the full right-of-way width grading necessary to install the internal collector road system to service this development. This development proposes to collect runoff from approximately 15 acres in the extreme northeast corner of this development and discharge it into the west ditch of Dodd Road. However, elevation constraints require that this storm sewer be constructed to its outlet pond (GP -4) in the northwest corner of Wescott Road and T.H. 149. From here, water will be conveyed to the east side of T.H. 149 into Pond GP -7, which presently does not have an outlet. Subsequently, an outlet for Pond GP -7 must be ordered for Council action prior to final plat approval. The alternative would be to expand Outlot A to incorporate approximately 30 houses fronting onto the loop street in the northeast corner, which lie within this drainage district. The remainder of the drainage is generally directed to the south and west through Ponds JP -55, JP -54 and into Pond JP -22. Because there presently does not exist any storm sewer facilities in the area to handle the r-inoff from this development, Pond JP -22 must.have its outlet constructed through Pond JP -21 where it will be pumped up to Wescott Road (Pond JP-19).and into a trunk storm sewer system proposed to be constructed within Wescott Road during 1987. All ponds except JP -54 lie within the overall Eagan Hills Farms PUD development. Subsequently, if adequate ponding, utility and construction easements cannot be,obtained from the private property incorporating Pond JP -54, additional storage capacity will have to be provided within JP -55, and its outlet will have to be rerouted to discharge directly into JP -22 on the south end. Final storm water pond storage capacity design requirements will have an impact on the final approved grading plan and the determination of buildable lots surrounding these drainage basins. In addition to this development not proposing 'to provide the grading �=Y of the dedicated park property to its ultimate useable standards, it is directing surface water runoff into this low lying park property without providing a storm water outlet. Subsequently, either the park property will have to be graded to final design standards approved by the Park Department, or storm sewer outlet facilities must be provided as a condition,of this development approval. While the City is presently pursuing a public improvement" project to install the required trunk storm sewer facilities necessary to handle this development, it must be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. UTILITIES: A 12" trunk water main presently exists within Wescott Road which is of sufficient size and pressure to service this development. However, as a part of the overall development of the Eagan Hills Farms PUD proposal, it will be necessary to install a 12" trunk water main along the west side of Dodd Road from Wescott Road to the southern boundary of this development. In addition, a 12" trunk water main must be constructed within the proposed Elrene Road with a connection to the required installation of a 16" trunk water main within the Northview Park Road alignment. Internal 6" lateral mains can then be distributed throughout this development to provide individual services. Sanitary sewer presently does not exist in the vicinity to provide service to this development. A major lift station must be installed east of Dodd Road outside the limits of this development which must then be pumped into the existing trunk sanitary sewer located at the intersection of Diffley and Dodd Roads. While the City is pursuing the installation of these trunk sanitary sewer and water main facilities for installation during 1987, final plat approval should not be granted until these projects have been t� ordered for installation by Council action. `' Appropriate lateral or individual service stuns must be provided to the property lines of the unplatted property adjacent to this plat fronting on Dodd Road. STREETS/CIRCULATION: Considerable evaluation and detailed traffic generation and distribution studies have been performed for the overall Eagan Hills Farms PUD concept. Major access to this particular development will be provided by the upgrading of Wescott Road, Dodd Road (County Road 63) Elrene Road and North view Park Road. While this development does not provide a connection -to Wescott Road, it was proposed under the original concept of the Eagan Hills Farms development and resulting traffic distribution studies indicate that this connection is necessary. It is recommended that it be located at the crest of Wescott Road near Outlot B approximately 1,300' west of the Dodd Road centerline. Dodd. Road should be completed to its ultimate four• -lane design through the final construction of its most southerly lane and bituminous trailway adjacent to the northern boundaries of this development. Also, it is recommended that Elrene Road be constructed as a 36' wide street with a parking lane and bituminoup trail on the east and north side of Elrene Road to its ultimate connection with Dodd Road to provide service to the proposed adjacent parkland dedication. a. The traffic report also recommends that a 36' wide collector street, with a parking lane and trailway on the west side, be constructed from Elrene Road to the southwest corner of this development and its future connection with NorthvieU P ' Road.. The overall layout and internal traffic circulation eliminates direct driveway access onto these referenced collector roads and provides cul-de-sacs where necessary due to topographic and/or boundary constraints. Due to the existing development or topography on several unplatted properties adjacent to this development along Dodd Road, it is not practical or feasible to anticipate and/or provide future street access, with the exception of the two parols located on either side of Elrene Road as it intersects Dodd Road. Both of these parcels should be serviced with stub streets at their northern ends. Similar to the trunk utilities necessary to service this development, the upgrading of Wescott Road and the installation of Elrene Road and the southerly collector are proposed to be installed under a City contract during 1987. However, .their installation must be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate a 50' half right-of-way for Dodd Road (County Road 63) and Wescott Road. It shall also dedicate and/or provide an 80' full right-of- way for Elrene Road and the southerly collector to Northview Park Road at the southwest corner. This development shall acquire or dedicate all required utility line and ponding easements located outside of dedicated public right-of- way as a part of or prior to final plat approval. Ponding easement Ah dedication shall be in accordance with the requirements of the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan and any subsequent revisions necessitated by detailed review of this development proposal. The extension and connection of Elrene Road and the installation of the sanitary sewer lift station and force main outlet on the east side of Dodd Road will require. the acquisition of easements outside of the limits of the overall Eagan Hills Farm development. Therefore, if this development cannot provide those easements necessary to install the streets and utilities to provide its service,- it shall accept its pro rata per acre share of the cost of acquisition by the City. This development shall acquire all related regulatory agency permits in a time frame according to their requirements. Utility construction and driveway access permits must be obtained from the County Highway Department if construction occurs prior to County Road 63 turnback to the City's jurisdiction. ASSESSMENTS: No trunk area sanitary sewer, water or storm sewer assessments have been levied against the property proposed to be developed under this application. In addition, this development has not paid any costs towards the construction of the existing Wescott or Dodd Roads. z Due to the fact that all major trunk utility and collector street °rry facilities must be installed to provide service to this development, all related trunk area, lateral benefit and residential equivalent assessments will be incorporated in those feasibility reports. � 6� The only exception relates to the future upgrading of Dodd Road, y; which is not scheduled for the near future. Therefore, this development shall assume its future assessment obligations for the upgrading of Dodd Road as a condition of final plat approval and identified as follows: ITEM Dodd Rd. St. Improvement QUANTITY RATE 962 if $17.72/lf * * 50% of 1987 residential equivalent rate. AMOUNT $17,046.64 The final assessment obligations will be determined at the time of final plat application based on actual dimensions. CONDITIONS: STONE BRIDGE 1, A 50' half rig: -it -of -way must be dedicated for Wescott and Dodd Roads adjacent to this development. An 80' right-of-way must be dedicated for Elrene Road and a 40' right-of-way must be dedicated for the southerly extension of the collector street to the southwest corner. 2. In addition to the required common lot line drainage and utility easements, all ponding easements and utility easements located outside of public right-of-way shall be dedicated with (Sou the final plat as required by final detail design alignment, depth and dimensions. 3. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all permanent right-of-way, utility and ponding easements in addition to temporary -slope and construction easements from the undeveloped property adjacent to this proposal. In addition, this development shall assume its prorata share on an area basis for all costs associated with the acquisition of permanent and construction easements to install the trunk sanitary sewer lift station and force main outlet on the east side of Dodd Road and the connection of Elrene Road to Dodd Road. 4. This development shall grade all parkland and collector street alignments to the final design standards as required by the City. 5. An outlet for Pond GP -7 must be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval, or approximately 30 lots in the northeast corner must be incorporated into an outlot until the required storm sewer outlet has been approved. 6. This development shall provide a public street access to -Wescott Road at approximately 1,300' west of the existing centerline intersection of Dodd Road with Wescott. 7, The installation of trunk sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer and collector road construction/upgrading shall be ordered by Council action �rIto final plat approval. I 8. This development shall assume its future assessment obligation r: for the upgrading of Dodd Road at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval based on final plat calculations for frontage abutting Dodd Road. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in a time frame consistent with their requirements. 10. This development shall provide sanitary sewer and water lateral or service stubs to the adjacent undeveloped property at the appropriate locations. 11. This development shall provide public road access to the two unplatted parcels adjacent to the proposed Elrene Road. intersection with Dodd Road. 12. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet be reviewed and 'approved by all agencies prior to any construction or site preparation. 13. A planned development agreement be entered into specifying the lot size deviations in accordance with this specific plan. 14. The applicant should meet with adjacent property owners in order .to provide the extension to E lrene Road as well as the potential to stub proposed cul-de-sacs to adjacent properties, 15. The City shall authorize all improvements to be installed into this area. 16. All standard plat conditions shall be included in the report. i 9 . . ... ,I yJ � i ''� z. ♦ LU O cc Ltj LU PA . ; � { � '�l '•. . ''�:��; �-f ,:i•�, � fa •..tie; ., .1 i ':J .7dF'e •, ' . GGQ �V. '• i � ., ter' 'l- -t'•-G �'. � �- '. �•.-- ` • :' 1. _ m _ .�.♦'. Wit' ;_,� _:. - ` �, - ,3�''�� -_ `�) %'_� ,;, ';• 'I �,. _� �,,�.�f.- ;/,fir%f',•- ' ti 1.;{\(��-i. yam_.' 1♦ r f t' Nr,:, , Y (2-0- I C."a -. I Mj ii k1D-s L,? RD.DPF.tro 2 8 1 tL4 42" V -6a kE r -1 84 -U _11E= d P DU 85 848.0 TO ff,60.D 8 D 85 3 r COT S -9 7-G 11'�.65 WEj E BE COT 0 ADDI T ro GP -9 L P -w -.879.3 856.0 CARRIAGE 866.0 HILLS LbRE41 12" IGOLF I\\; I S E DEN LOP I , - GAR 'S14 PtACE 0019 b3 .0 873.0 WOO* - K.'$.TP 11 Z --j-'r-854.01- JP -16 JP- 17 L I N 682-0 . I / 874.7 S A -1*65 3,1 A .00 1 %P\ 3 8580 879.1 e0o 83LO .871.0 .4111111� 7 -177 �-97 If j 1 A /Z .mmm�, 0 *%,." -------- rol G,-, L j. VpL45 '401 86'4.0 L I - §' - % IP 1-879.7 WESCOTT I m -42: 887.1 'a897J'H-j P N, I P1. --wl� -7 886.1 STAT 0 -.0 r 64 .5yrs 1 a - j ID i : - - 1 .0 f. 6 887.0 1 %IP- 18 72.0 3 L.S:-15��M.0, 86 93.5 12' -41' '7,OLO I I ' 6'53 8 JP 1 C -Rj 14 P a . j ;;'8885.3--- i % jp-63... _P 870 '32 MIN 5 2� �7 8997- Q6 'is 885.7 2 JP -31 888.�l 876.3 1st aD, /_ -7 --- 69 3. T 8 9 4.0 -�?i G�-4 j P80.4 890 8,95-0-- 88 )AD./ OT -h 21 J -n 8874 E:9S 91:1f Cb o 874.0 V. :-.XX .... ;- 882.0 7. 2il-F+"C:,0N J -P L Aj r 30 8822 873D JP -56 879*4 856.0 864.4 '-JP- 54-.':*./ JP -2 SQUARE j 852.0 N 855.6 J-0 �k K4 X jp J -w ....... 815.3 JP- 840.0 852.2 8574 2 3 .... .. i T JP -2 .1 NC w N 843.3 _E7 A,,- 84-9. b RK JddN JP -3'4 j - 884.0 JP -53 - P- JP -25 8-9 9' I 86 82C --....- .0 8 4 . 84t L.S.-18 0! : JP -29 0 926.0 i� 945. w ol -j P -,z!,2 7 89 6.0 904.0 Q JP -52 . 7T, 8P-51 76.0 0. 0 ILPSIN ACE ,--�j city of eagan PUBLIC .1 WORKS 10 r);= DA 0 m TME -68 862.0 .............. ............... ................ SUBJECT PARCEL :% .............. STONE BRIDGE STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN FIG. 4-1 approved :I I plate #: JP -25 817.0 824.0 �11 L.S.-18 0! : 0 A H NEI j�i Q JP -52 -68 862.0 .............. ............... ................ SUBJECT PARCEL :% .............. STONE BRIDGE STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN FIG. 4-1 approved :I I plate #: 9 co �.'7,"IHV IiILLS ('OLF GARDEN LC TS 1 12" N — X g5 F �c — _54R �9 l� I 12" i C-Jiv. PP 'ZII C -HH O 12 Q 101 >IOI 12 56 7 I I .• C -II L-- W \ C- BB 01 47)-4 26 3o" STONE city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME 3 AAI 12 j \N1 WESTPURUSNs ;,... IN — B.B U (n "AUDITOR'S SUBD. NO. C -L ' -CC I r I �— BRIDGE SUBJECT PARCEL SANITARY SEWER MASTED PLAN w z FIG.. #2 approved: standards plate #: / r 1. / 1 1 (n "AUDITOR'S SUBD. NO. C -L ' -CC I r I �— BRIDGE SUBJECT PARCEL SANITARY SEWER MASTED PLAN w z FIG.. #2 approved: standards plate #: r 9 cc 61.5//80.0 I'Wl — 6T=6/86.0 496/66.0 T.5/43028 18" I 1 20'::..— ��J2(� 63 24+ 62 �Z4- .-1 U`bPhIEF! EpA�—_•_._� L- 67 1:.66 .' 8" 1 2t61 60 PARK TO R 3.6/ 2.0 di•�t{EtQBf(T 8 1J HILLS` 48.9/66. 1`-- —�— - — 17.1/32. WESCOTT 10 M.G. ADDITION OUNO STORAGE -- -. CARRIAGE H.W.L. 1059 OB HILLS OREI GOLF �1 COURSE GAR.. EN WTS PLACE KAp :KWOOD �✓T SA R. k 63 16.j / 5 A RAILS X110 43.3/60. ` t6" Is ' / - 240 53.2/710 58. l..—. {i n i v+ U)i ` •-___ _____ y1 I III 50.3/67.0; I ;L L D .}01 >r_ WEST Pl'a1.ISNiN I� _ / _ r!� Ist ADDLij w 181 � / i ��1 I I HigL�S •" ''-?r-,�':._r__ __l \ i ---- _ JOT i ROM/ y a 12 50.4/67.01 1 114 38.4/56.0 •:•:� :•:::•:•:•:� •' • 11 \—'c ^ ` . 53. /72.0 16 �0 119 54.6/71.0\_%� ,12n ••� W i 118 53.1/68.0 f: 50.3/67.0 •;': :;:�' 12" 16" •� �;� A � n ), r k78 51.4 / 6 5. 0 .. •••••• —_—� tI f J • 4 i 1 —�. 18.4/29.0 �� :•••. �:• 116 66.7/85.0 I9.1� 12" �16 M.G. GROUND STORAGE I f 1'$1 5000 G.P.M. BOOSTER H.W.L 1059 183 " I ...186 42.2/58.0 182 24 }� 68.0/ ' fi 0/72.0 720' 20" a�'� 9ry" 1020 ' 18T.39.0 54.p O 1k 30 _........ _.._........__.. _. 1 237 12 k 184 68.7/74.0 185 1 85.2 /95.0 188 n rn1 16 I A ll s SU8D. N0.42 - ' 86.0/ 11.0 w \ 74.4/82.0 I `-- . 84.51950 STONE _ BRIDGE j SUBJECT PARCEL ity of eagan PUBLIC -�= WORKS DEPARTME FIG. #3 WATER approved—, standard plate #: — MASTER PLAN MIE MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS TOM HEDGES, CITY ADML�STRATOR FROM: KEN YRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1987 RE: EAGAN HILLS FARM P.U.D. - BRIDAL RIDGE & STONE BRIDGE ADDITIONS The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed P.U.D. at both its January and February Commission meetings. The Development Committee met on January 28th to work on issues pertaining to the proposed neighborhood park and conducted a special Commission meeting on February 11th for the purpose of reviewing the P.U.D. and the proposed Bridal Ridge and Stone Bridge Additions. The main issue for the Commission pertained to the suitability of the neighborhood park and proposed green belt. The initial proposal in the P.U.D. did not provide sufficient parkland with suitable depths to provide for adequate facility sizings. Second, the park was in a low area requiring significant fill. The developer has responded to both concerns by: 1) agreeing to adjust the proposed Elrene Road alignment, allowing for greater park depth; 2) had agreed to provide fill/grading of the central park 'area in conjunction with the gross grading of the project. By notation, on the preliminary plat, the proposed Elrene Road is to be moved approximately 20' in the final plat process. Movement of the road/curvature is north and west of the intersection with Northview Park Road. Relative to the proposed open space - the Commission has agreed to accept the area as described, assuming that the proposed trail linkages are not impacted by the bounce of the ponding areas. This open space is taken as "partial credit." Specific credit has not been calculated, but agreed to in thq overall conditions of acceptance of the parks dedication which shall also include a cash dedication of $100,000. Mr. Rod Hardy proposed to the Commission, the land dedications as depicted by parcels #1 - #5 and the $100,000 cash dedication. The cash dedication is to be made "up front" and is to be included as part of the bonding package for streets and utilities. This bonded amount is to be spread to the land as an assessment. Speaking in favor of the cash dedication up front, the Commission noted that this would provide the funding for development of the park simultaneously with developmet of the residential area. COM I WION' S RECOMMENDATION The Advisory Commission has recommended to the City Council to: (1) accept parkland parcels #1 & #2 with the platting of the first phase developments of Bridal Ridge and Stone Bridge Additions. The Commission made a second motion to recommend: (1) conceptual acceptance of parcels #3, #4, and #5 as proposed in the P.U.D. subject to a trailway around the ponds and a cash amount of $100,000 to be financed by bonding as proposed. It is also recommended that this development be responsible for trail/sidewalks on Northview Park Road, Wescott Road, and Elrene Road consistent with the City's trailway plan. For additional information and discussion concerning Commission's actions, please refer to the minutes of January 8, February 5 and the special minutes of February 11, 1987. Respectfully submitted, Director of Parks & Recreation KV/js APC Minutes February 24, 1987 actual approval for a concept was not required. Discussion among the Planning Commission members then centered around whether the concept plan included any density projections. The developer indicated that a net density review was not being requested. Mr. Colbert suggested that rather than the plan being scaled back, it should have been withdrawn, and that the action in regard to the concept plan was to be informal only. After some discussion, the commission agreed that no action was necessary in regard to the concept plan. STONEBRIDGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Joe Harrison then opened the public hearing in regard to the application of United Mortgage Company for a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family Planned Development), and a preliminary plat consisting of 196 lots on 96.45 acres, south of Wescott Road and west of Dodd road in Section 24. Mr. Richard Carson of Elrene Road appeared and expressed confusion in regard to his previous right to respond and expressed concern regarding the Neighborhood Business District in the northeast corner, and the reduction in lot sizes from R-1 requirements. Mr. Mark Parranto appeared and expressed his concern that the developer had not made a presentation in regard to the proposed plats and suggested that similar R-1 PD plats had been approved previously and that the density was tie Ui very good and even better than some standard R-1 developments. Mr. Sellergren did indicate that the proposed outlot previously designated NB in Eagan Hills Farms development, could be platted as Residential. Mr. Tower reviewed the overall plan, indicating that over a 10% park dedication was being made. Doris Wilkins questioned the ability to obtain major street access across private property to Dodd Road. It was indicated that if an agreement could not be reached, that condemnation may become necessary. In response to member Wilkins' inquiries in regard to the cul-de-sacs, Mr. Colbert indicated that they were indeed acceptable to the Engineering Department as being necessary to preserve as much of the natural environment as possible. Ms. Sandy Klein, indicating her concern in regard to the use of planned development and environmental impact concerns. The public hearing was closed and in response to member Voracek questions, Mr. Colbert explained the storm drainage proposed for the northeast portion. Mr. Runkle indicated that the Park Commission had acted on the proposal and Mr. Colbert explained his recommendation in regard to stub streets on the two bubbles along Wescott Road. There was some discussion in regard to the proposed outlot, which was not to be included in the rezoning. In addition, the use of cul-de-sacs that bordered or nearly bordered exception properties was reviewed. Voracek moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning from Agricultural to R-1 PD. Voracek, Gustafson, Krisnik and Harrison voted aye; '+ and Trygg, McCrea and Wilkins voted nay. The motion was passed. 6 APC Minutes February 24, 1987 Voracek moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to staff conditions. Member McCrea indicated her position that the plat would be a great place for upper income housing. Gustafson, Voracek and Krisnik voted aye; Trygg, Wilkins, McCrea and Harrison voted nay. The chair casting the deciding vote based upon his position that the outlot should be zoned R-1 along with the remainder of the plat. The motion died for lack of majority. Wilkins asked if the developer would consider a continuance in order to resolve the issues. Mr. Sellergren indicated that the developer preferred to go before the council. Wilkins moved to recommend denial on the basis that the six acre northeasterly parcel would have to be developed commercially due to the proposed layout and there is already too much commercial property within the City. McCrea seconded the motion based on her belief that the property should be developed for more "high test" housing. Trygg, Wilkins, McCrea and Krisnik voted aye; Gustafson and Voracek voted nay. The motion was passed. BRIDLE RIDGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing convened by Chairman Harrison was in regard to the application of Sienna Corporation for a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family Planned Development) and a preliminary plat consisting of 143 acres with 203 single family lots on the north half of Section 24. Mr. David Sellergren described the proposal, indicating that there were only 8 lots under the .85 foot width requirements and the development included 36 "executive" lots. Member Trygg questioned the request for a variance from the 15 foot side yard setback. James Hill indicated that the purpose was to allow the garage to be in line with the home. After some discussion, Mr. Rod Hardy indicated the developer would waive that request. It was explained that a Homeowners Association would be required in order to control private open space planned within the development. In response to Chairman Harrison's questions, the developer indicated that there were 21 of the 203 lots that do not comply fully with the R-1 requirements. McCrea moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend denial of the rezoning based upon the ability to comply with R-1 requirements. Trygg, McCrea and Wilkins voted yes; Gustafson, Voracek, Krisnik and Harrison voted no. The motion failed. Voracek moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning to R-1 PD. Voracek, Gustafson, Krisnik and Harrison voted aye; Trygg, McCrea and Wilkins voted nay, and the motion carried. ��s Council Minutes March 3, 1987 9. The southerly access :: op !T ej pment shall be restricted to a right -in entrance only and en'�tszced through """'per signage in accordance with City design standards. 10: Permits shall be obtair[Q ::::fX01a.•.DA1ct4:* County and Northern Natural Gas Company for all grading contained.:X, 1: ;h :--::'their p y g g jurisdictional area prior to construction or final plat approval in accordance with their requirements. 11. A revised grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted showing the limits of grading associated with Lot 1 and temporary connection to existing elevatidh7:............ 12. The extensive retaining �0,1:ls required shall be constructed in accordance with City design standards..:. 13. This development for any outstanding, unlevied or deferred assessments or **Mdt�­finaiie aJ::'obligations associated with this development. 14. The main entrance to this site shall have a maximum width of 30 feet and radii of 20 feet. 15. That developer and owi a ::::::•sball enter into an agreement to guarantee' that the service bays will be* kkk.:_ 9ii r .tion at any time when fuel sales are made through the gas pumps. 16. The northerly side of the::.hui.ldt$::will be designed and constructed in a manner architecturally with the front elevation of the building. All councilmembers voted in favor. Egan then moved, Smith seconded the motion to approve the conditional use permit for a self-service gas.:A ation•Jor_:Lot 1, according to all ordinance and normal city requirements.1:::Cs?tei: ins: EAGAN HILLS FARMS:*.": CONCtkTUAL PLAN STONE BRIDGE & BRIDLE Rthft PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS Tom Hedges introduced the proposed conceptual plan for roadway alignment, utility layout and park land dedication for the Eagan Hills Farms project, south of Wescott Road and west of Dodd Road. He stated that the Planning Commission had taken no formal action concerning the conceptual plan, and was intended for Planning Commission and Council z:iYbrmation purposes only. Dale Runkle indicated velopment application has been withdrawn and that an EAW for etra:::::Wo: tdiuisions , including Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge is now being process ed:'''No'EIS will be processed for Eagan Hills Farms at the present time. 7� 6 Council Minutes March 3, 1987 Dave Sellergren, together : tftii ''ito3'' i1a'rdt:;: and John Hankenson of Sienna Corporation, Ron Helmer 4:$:: United Mortgage, Wayne Tauer of Pioneer Engineering, and Jim Hill of Jaetes Hill Engineers, were also present. Dave Sellergren made a preseri:at:t3ra:•:q:Zealf of the developers discussing feasibility of the projectand 'bei# f :'a:% -'to the community at large. He displayed various schematics covering the. developments, including utilities, streets, park dedication proposed, etc. He noted that Park No. 1 and Park No. 2 are proposed to be dedicated with the two present developments and briefly described the overall plan introduced to the City in 1986. He also explained that the developers intend to:o:iw::f?roig}i::saith the Council's objectives, including some executive type Regarding the application for .approval ... :.of the Stone Bridge Planned Development, including rezoning and:: elimmoi?y plat approval, he noted that the 96.45 acre parcel would=:lcstiat 13 acres will be dedicated consisting 18%, according to h s''cai'cular ati:: with 160 lots over 12,000 square foot minimum size. The average square footage per lot will be 15,550 square feet with 2.03 gross units per acre and 2.44 net units per acre, excluding street right-of-way only. 146 lots will exceed 13,000 square feet, 24 that are 20,000 square feet or larger. He described the larger lots being spread out with many facing parks or low land areas often consisting of the more.. sensitive areas. The house:::::::VP-��e.: range will be from $110,000.00 to $160,000.00 projected. Wayne Tauer described the intent= to retatt::the natural terrain, and noted it is designed for neighborhoods >` her:: ly$AX-I- t sizes. Larger lots would be located where they are spread ouC•:::t�?s i"''W"'t the development and would be located primarily where naturaf:::-drftiEW1 ties exist. Relating to the Bridle Ridge Planned Development application, including rezoning and preliminary plat, the 123.3 acre parcel ---.would include 203 lots with some outlots proposed primarily along the major streets. Councilmembers were concerned about the pote tial. _.f4p.r ::•tax.;; forfeiture of the outlots that would be owned by a homeowner:'::tt::fit;g ;:s�ia • :'' c:ia:C:k.Ati:;::'::Mr. Sellergren stated that the lots can be eliminated and that ... 't'he'."'Iand' 'be included as part of the residential lots. 51 lots in Bridle Ridge would exce6;I::: 20,00'O.. -square feet in size, the park dedication would consist of approximately 1&l::of the gross area with 182 of 203 lots over 12,000 square feet. 140 lots would exceed 13,000 square feet with 1.65 gross units per acre and 2-.0 net units per acre excluding street only. The average lot size would be 16,890 square feet, with $28,000 to $42,000 wholesale prices per lot to builders. Housing prices would range from $110,000.00 to -$225,000.00 per unit. He furtlit.::mentioned that 36 lots could be executive home size. The drainage issues Air. -the northeast corner of Stone Bridge have been resolved accorr3•iso$.:;.ro.;�Ng.:.::;:5ie.3Lergren, and there is no intent that the developer request the 3; -'t: to the use of Outlot A at the northeast corner. Council Minutes March 3, 1987 Mayor Blomquist asked about: =Ctie '''OiiClots "::4:9 Bridle Ridge and had concerns about tax forfeiture and fiii::ther objected::*io- the outlots being retained in that fashion. She further note -&•:.that if the..pXAposed commercial parcel is not addressed, it leaves future uncirr:t;ainty and ,t-h-divld be addressed at the present time. Mr. Sellergren stated thaG::ie:•:dv;elgr would allow for street linkage to the northeast outlot and the Malarge amount of commercial land. on Diffley Road existing at the present time. Statistically, 41% of 81 lots were 85 foot minimum lot width in Stone Bridge and 25% or 55 lots are under 85 foot minimum lot width in Bridle Ridge. Councilman Wachter stated rliat"he" :►as tit: the impression that a large percentage of the lots were planri�d- for ::oversized lots according to the information submitted in the fall of 1;9:86. .Councilman Egan indicated the plans do not meet the intent of the:::::l:Qts fo:r ;executive size housing, and do not merit City consideration ,6r*: �p�c al; . o: is to deviate from the minimum requirements which are intend ed:.:.to'-';"ncourage�.::h•igh test housing. Councilman Ellison suggested more .active park use land may be desirable and also suggested encouraging larger side yard setbacks. John Hankinson on behalf .:p.f Sienna Corporation, stated that all lots, complied with the 85 foot minim:itn::t1.::Bridle Ridge, and that 57 additional lots' would be permitted. In Bridle Ridge, the density is:::::2.0 uiii-ps:::per net acre, excluding roads, with 2.58 net acres excluding parks:,::•s_ z s':::arid utility easements. In Stone Bridge, the net un:k.. 'per acre is 2.4 excluding roads, and 3.14 excluding all dedicated areas. Rod Hardy stated that attempts have been made to work with landscaping and that the width of the streets is proposed to be reduced. He further noted that a Petition is being suhm.i,tted..:�pr..the..installation of the utilities at the present time throughout Wachter requested more information about the use of ttie­.proposed''park land, and Mayor Blomquist suggested a 12,000 square foot mini6i6 must::::be reviewed carefully; further, that the outlots and the northeast comrii:e-ccial ;area be designed with potential for residential lots. A question �I:Oo aide as to whether the Planning Commission should consider the developments:::again if there are substantial changes. Councilman Smith noted it would be desirable that the planned development for the entire Eagan Hills Farms would be most..desirable for a review of the entire development. Scattered large lots may �:e:practical to begin with, but he strongly questioned the development of:::::::10 cul-de-sacs and suggested possible connections of some of..:t lent; w$t-B:iu:;.•the.;;developments. Screening along Wescott Road was an issue widths for streets was also discussed. 11 Council Minutes March 3, 1987 Mr. Sellergren recommended::': gMe':::::Cciiitic'il•' :continue the applications until further information is submitted;: Tom Hedges suggested requiringcertain ::a;:pimum housing sizes and he was also strongly concerned about=:::::E}it::: Gi:L�::::::staff load at the present time to process the extensive changes that':':a.Y:s.-::�:iig suggested. Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to continue the Stone. Bridge application until the next regular Council meeting, with the understanding that all information requested by the City Council described above, shall be submitted timely for staff review and comment prior to the next regular meeting. All members voted in favor. Egan then moved, Ellison seconded ::::Lhe mat;i:bn to continue the application regarding Bridle Ridge until the nex.t..regular..meeting on the same conditions as those described regarding Stone B;ge. 4':1:4nembers voted yes. ROCKWOODS ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT An application for rezoning of 5.3 acres currently designated R-2 within Lexington South PD to R-1 Single Family, and preliminary plat creating two lots came to the Council fox.. its review. Dale Runkle described the application and noted that the:::::::tVo.:...lots have access.. to unimproved Lakewood Hills Drive. There is nosariitax.::sc�ze. or water main available to service the proposed development, and ther efore'ri;o:uY:site septic system and private well would be provided. Couri4:ilman $mitft had concerns about future subdivision, including future roadbneet:kiit5 in the general area. Smith moved, Egan seconded :::};e:':'`inotion to continue the application until the next regular.meeting to affow a review by the staff and the applicants of any possible overlay of the plat that may have been done by an earlier owner, and to determine whether it would comply with logical development in the area, and further to direct the staff to prepare a rough sketch for future development. All voted in favor.,.. LEXINGTON POINTE ADDITION :':REZONING: & PRELIMINARY PLAT The application of Tri -Land Propez't:fes fn:y':*:: amendment to Lexington South Planned Development, rezoning from CSC to PD K t::and preliminary plat approval next was discussed by the councilmembers. It was suggested by the applicant that the application be delayed until March 17, 1987. Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to continue the -applications until March 17, 1987 as requested. After further discussion, however. -the motion was withdrawn. 79 9 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT/BRIDLE RIDGE ADDITION C. Rezoning From A to R-1 Planned Development and a Preliminary Plat Entitled Bridle Ridge Addition --A public hearing was held by the APC at their February 24 meeting to consider the rezoning and prelminary plat applications for Bridle Ridge Addition and the APC has recommended approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat to the City Council. At the March 3, 1987 City Council meeting, there were concerns raised about the proposed outlots, number of nonconforming lots and other issues as defined in the City Administrator's memo that preceded the Stone Bridge agenda item in the packet, therefore, the item was continued by the City Council until the March 17 meeting. The City Planner and developer has responded to the various questions raised by the City Council and for a copy of this information, refer to pages 2 through �& . For a copy of the original staff report regarding the rezoning and prelminary plat for Bridle Ridge, refer to pages 692i_ through ZZZf This document includes the recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and official minutes of the APC. In the case of Bridle Ridge there are a few lots that do not conform with either the 85 foot width or 12,000 square feet in lot size, therefore, the R-1 Planned Development zoning is appropriate. The City Council directed the developers to provide explanation and reasons for the platting of any lots that are inconsistent with the R-1 zoning classification criteria and the developers have done that and will provide more explanation at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To rezoning from A to R-1 Planned Development plat for Bridle Ridge Addition as presented. US approve or deny_: 1. the and 2. the preliminary CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: BRIDLE RIDGE REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: SIENNA CORPORATION LOCATION: N ]�, SECTION 24 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1987, UPDATE MARCH 13, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS The preliminary plat and rezoning consists of approximately 123.3 acres and will now contain 202 single family lots. The area will be divided into four neighborhoods - Cantor Glen, Carriage Pines, Surrey Woods and Bridle Ridge Additions. The updated statistical numbers for the Bridle Ridge Additions are as follows: The original plan submitted had 21 lots below 12,000 sq. ft. The revised plan received March 10, 1987, consists of 7 lots below the 12,000 sq. ft. The original plan contained 51 lots which had widths less than 85 ft. at the 30 ft. setback. The new plan proposes 20 lots which now have less than 85 ft. width at the 30 ft. setback of which 11 are on cul-de-sacs in the development plan. In reviewing the overall, it is staff's understanding that only two lots now have less than 12,000 sq. ft. and less than 85 ft. width at the 30 ft. setback. CANTER GLEN Canter Glen is proposed to contain 31.6 acres and 63 lots. The minimum lot size is 10,400 sq. ft., with the average lot size being 14,180 sq. ft. The minimum width at the 30 ft. setback is 75 ft. with the average lot width being 88 ft. In review of their setback request, they are proposing to deviate from the setback criteria set up in the City Code in regard to setbacks along public street right-of-ways, setbacks between living unit and garage and setbacks from the side yard from public right-of- way. Staff can go into these setbacks in detail if the Council requests. CARRIAGE PINES The Carriage Pines neighborhood is proposed to consist of 21.0 gross acres and contain 46 lots or 2.1 lots per gross acre. The minimum lot size is 11,000 sq. ft., with the average lot size being 14,950 sq. ft. The minimum lot width at setback is 75 ft., with the average lot width at setback being 90 ft. Again, the setbacks are proposed to be deviated as indicated in the first neighborhood. 91 BRIDLE RIDGE The Bridle Ridge neighborhood is proposed to consist of 36.7 gross acres and contain 37 single family lots. The development consists of 1.0 lots per gross acre. The minimum lot size is 15,300, with the average lot size being 23,670 sq. ft. The minimum lot width at setback is 100 ft., with the average lot width being 116 ft. at setback. Again, the applicants are proposing to deviate from the setback criteria as stated in the above -referenced neighborhood. SURREY WOODS The last of the four neighborhoods is proposed to consist of 34.3 gross acres, contain 56 single-family lots for 1.63 lots per gross acre. The setbacks are proposed to be modified as in the rest of the neighborhoods. The one unique factor regarding this neighorhood is that the first 330 ft. south of Wescott Road contains a very large right-of-way. The right-of-way for Elrene Road is proposed 125 ft. wide from centerline of road. This is the area referenced as the one area where an outlot should possibly be established versus the road right-of-way dedicated to the City. If the City receives dedication of this right-of-way, it will be the City's responsibility for maintenance and preservation from the time of dedication. If established as an outlot, the City could require that a homeowners association be established and this area maintained by the surrounding neighborhoods. This can be discussed in further detail at the City Council meeting. Included with this portion of the report are the original conditions of the February 16 report. The Planning Department has not reviewed these conditions with Engineering to see if any should be eliminated or added, however, all of the conditions have been included with this revised report. too GRADING/DRAINAGE: This development incorporates very hilly and rolling topography with elevation differentials approaching 65-70 feet in the southwest area and that portion adjacent to Wescott Road. The grading plan submitted proposes to limit their grading activity to only that which is necessary to install the internal streets and adjacent buildable sites. Major overall site grading will disturb the majority of the property located in the southwest portion of this development. In spite of the extreme topographies within this development, maximum slopes are being maintained at 3:1 with street grades not exceeding 8.0%. However, the proposed street grades of Surrey Woods Road and Bridle Ridge Road as they connect to Wescott Road do not match with the existing grade of Wescott Road. These will have to be revised on the final approved grading plan to provide better compatibility. In addition, the Bridle Ridge Road access to Wescott Road and the adjacent lots and short cul-de-sac should be lowered by approximately 10+ feet to minimize entrance grades and backyard slopes down to Wescott Road. This would greatly reduce the resulting 3:1 backyard slopes with minimum environmental impact due to no significant vegetation existing in this area. While the major grading is confined to the street alignment and building pad, .no grading of the proposed parkland dedication is indicated. It would be appropriate to perform this grading in conjunction with the development of this property to avoid major excavation adjacent to single family homes at a later date and insure compatibility of common property line elevations. On the east side of Elrene Road at its interection with Wescott Road, the developer is proposing to construct a 4 - 10 foot high retaining wall. It is recommended that this retaining wall be replaced with the proper 3:1 cut slope into the proposed Outlot A. All grading appears to be confined within the limits of this proposed development with no adjacent private property impacted. Approximately 11 acres of this site will drain north and west into the existing storm sewer within Wescott Road which discharges into Pond JP -19 to the west. Pond JP -19 presently does not have an outlet available. The remainder of the development will drain to the south and west into Pond JP -21 which also does not have an outlet available. Studies are presently being performed to initiate the lift station outlet from Pond.JP-21 and the gravity outlet from Pond JP -19 during the 1987 construction season. However, because this development is contingent upon these outlets being provided, they must be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. There is no outlet being provided for the existing isolated backyard drainage basin (6.9 acres) located adjacent to Wescott Road between Surrey Woods Road and Bridle Ridge Road. While this drainage basin receives only backyard runoff and no storm sewer runoff, a percolation test should be performed to determine whether an empty lift station manhole should be constructed for potential future pumping, similar to the Windtree 5th Addition to the north. In the southwest corner, an additional storm sewer lateral shall be installed within Canter Glen Lane to provide a maximum gutter flow of 600 feet prior to discharging into any interceptor catch basin. UTILITIES: A 12" trunk water main exists within Wescott Road which is of sufficient size and pressure to service this development. A 12" trunk main will be required to be installed within Elrene Road, in addition to a 16" trunk main within Northview Park Road from its connection with Elrene Road. There presently does not exist any sanitary sewer facilities available to service this proposed development. It will require the installation of a major lift station to be located east of Dodd Road and north of Diffley with the force main outlet to discharge into the existing trunk sanitary sewer located at the intersection of Dodd and Diffley Roads. Sanitary sewer and water" lateral facilities are being provided for future extensions to accommodate the overall phased development. There are no adjacent private properties that need to be provided with individual services under this development. The trunk sanitary sewer and water main collection/distribution system is necessary for the development of this proposal. Subsequently, it will be necessary to have the trunk facilities ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. STREETS/CIRCULATION: A comprehensive traffic generation and distribution study was performed for the overall Eagan Hill Farm P.U.D. concept. The result of that study indicates the need to upgrade Wescott Road to its ultimate four lane design section with a bituminous trail on the south side adjacent to this development. In �a- addition, Elrene Road must be constructed to a minimum 36 foot street with a parking lane and trailway along the east and north side of this extention to its ultimate connection with Dodd Road. It is also recommended that a collector road be extended southwesterly from Elrene Road to intersect with Northview Park Road. This should also be a minimum 36 foot wide with a parking lane and trailway located on the west side. Nine of the proposed ten cul-de-sacs are necessary due to topography and/or boundary constraints. It is recommended that the "bubble" on Carriage Lane just west of Elrene Road be eliminated by a slightly tighter curve. Stub streets are being provided for future extension and continuity with the next phase development. This layout is also compatible with the proposed Boulder Ridge Addition to the east. However, all stub streets must have a temporary cul-de-sac constructed until such time that their extension has been scheduled. Due to a revision in the recommended alignment of Northview Park Road, it will not provide a direct connection to Elrene Road but rather "T" into an intersection with a north/south collector from Elrene Road to the southern end of this development. Therefore, the short north/south collector street name should be changed accordingly. p� This development has provided good internal traffic circulation and eliminated any direct driveway access onto the proposed collector streets. Due to the requirement of this development to be serviced by these collector streets, they must be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval.. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate a 50 foot half right-of-way for Wescott Road. It shall also dedicate a necessary 80 foot right-of-way for Elrene Road and the appropriate 40 foot half right-of-way for the north/south collector from Elrene Road from Northview Park Road at the southern portion of this development. All internal looped streets shall have a minimum 60 foot right-of- way and all cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum 55 foot radius. The extension and connection of Elrene Road and the installation of the sanitary sewer lift station and force main outlet on the east side of Dodd Road will require the acquisition of easements outside of the limits of the overall Eagan Hills Farm Development. Therefore, if this development cannot provide those easements necessary to install the streets and utilities to provide its service, it shall accept its pro rata per acre share of the cost of acquistion by:the City. This development shall acquire all regulatory agency permits within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer has not been previously assessed over any of the property to be :_.incorporated by this development. In addition, this development has not contributed to the construction of Wescott;Road as it presently exists. Due to the fact that this development requires the installation and/or upgrading of all trunk utilities and related collector streets, it is anticipated that all related trunk area assessments, lateral benefits and residential equivalent obligations will be identified in that public improvement process. Therefore, there are no additional assessment obligations to be identified at this time. MISCELLANEOUS CONCERNS: This development is proposing to create several outlots that will not be conveyed as a part of -the City's park dedication requirements. The appropriate homeowners associations shall be established to ensure that the ownership and maintenance of these outlots are tied into the proposed newly created lots to eliminate the potential for tax forfeiture and future City maintenance and liability responsibilities. g!!5 .1 CONDITIONS BRIDLE RIDGE: 1. A 50' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Wescott Road. An 80' right-of-way shall be dedicated for Elrene Road. A 40' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for the north/south collector from Elrene Road to the future Northview Park Road at the southern boundary. 2. All internal loop streets shall have a minimum 60' right-of-way and all cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum 55' radius without a center island or a 65' minimum radius with a center island. 3. A lift station manhole and inlet pipe shall be constructed in the land locked drainage basin adjacent to Wescott Road between Surrey Woods Road and Bridle Ridge Road to accommodate a future temporary pump unless soil percolation tests verify this drainage basin's ability to be self-sufficient. 4. The northerly 600' of Bridle Ridge Road, related cul-de-sac and adjacent lots should be lowered approximately 10 feet to minimize the backyard slopes and access grades from Wescott Road. 5. The installation of trunk sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main facilities and required collector roads must be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 6. This development shall dedicate all required ponding easements and storm sewer utility easements as required by final approved utility construction and grading plans. 7. This development shall provide or assume its pro rate per acre share of costs associated with the acquisition of all street right-of-way, utility easements or ponding easements located outside of the boundaries of this development as necessary to provide street and utility service to this subdivision. 8. This development shall acquire all regulatory agency permits within the time frame required by the affected agency. g. This development shall perform or provide all grading requirements necessary fo-r the full right-of-way width construction of the internal collector roads and adjacent parklands to City approved standards. 10. Any outlot not conveyed to the City park system shall be incorporated into a homeowners association as required by the City. 11. Final detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval. 12. Temporary cul-de-sacs shall be constructed at the ends of all stub streets to City standards where their extension is not scheduled. Vo 13. In addition to the required common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate with the final plat all drainage and utility easements located outside the public right -of -way. - 14. An internal storm sewer lateral system shall be installed to insure interceptor catch basins are provided at least every 600 feet. 15. Surrey Woods Court, Carriage Circle and Coral Circle shall provide water main looping as required by City staff. 16. Carriage Lane street alignment west of E lrene Road shall be revised to eliminate the proposed "bubble." 17. Satisfactory findings and approvals are given on the EAW prior to any construction or grading of the site., 18. A planned development agreement shall be entered into for the Bridle Ridge planned development, spelling out the deviations in the lot size requirements. 19. 20. The City must authorize the installation of the major trunk utilities to this area/ A homeowners association must be established and documents reviewed and approved by the City in order that maintenance agreements have been established for the,outlots and private ownership. A1listandard plat conditions must be adhered toy,, � 7 Or N LS 4 LU co Co ' � '� �, -- � eZ ,tiq: to I "•�=it:: .,1I x j(} .' ,Ifl it `+�:'f 1 ,^.''O�D� o ,; 444, +� `__�7i', Y 1 � ..' �.%.. _ 1 �II •• 5. Jb - � .� 1•'1f 1.1 V� �[j - y '• � L..'' 4. �` . ' y '�. t� �.+t �;J II _ 'j - ell' i �- .,,ate''„' ' , ' � r ,• .. , , ' , ` . t , i ' jj 1 ., , _'•`. :..ley' ` .. .: � _ , i, i• r �.. + _ ' _ ,} '' ; dam% •,. ' yam., 1 , i :'% :��-'-- .__ ;' /` , f , 4. 01 0D 1 3- GOLF D`FMISSE -� 873.0 1 -- P-42 8871 ; E - N /L�$33A / P' Ibex rh 1 `' rte. - JB � 60.. itg JP -46 L'`" 887.0 '892.3 `•-` L.S.-15 a 'r '14B 3.5 12� ' r-- J ti 887 6 0 F.7- s� •� JP -32 i I a+ C� 885.7 o JP -31 t14: 88B.�1 a 876.3_ + IV - _.._.-88, 880.4 90.7 •N1� I! + 8 i 95 f Rc±�D.i J_h _ N 21 J -n 1. 11 p �_ 874.0 7 i I.l.l.'1.TMN Pl BB22 � ,ti, 882.0 �4' 8'f 87 p0 ;� f 879.4 �.• . l -� JP- 20 souaRE �•� `�s 852.0 +"Z, z N, 855.6 J-o�i '.•.•:••..• ga, JP -3'4 ��oJ-s 815.3 840.0 •: -- x =p �J-ddb--- l ���' ga, JP -3'4 ��oJ-s 884.0 .__._ 89/.9 ! JP -29 11 NI 926.0 \ •� 945.0 WI' 3� I a� 11J=1 �P-51 / e' JP -'53 86 .0 88 .. 4 '80.SI0 J- e KENN ,N ;VP -28 11 I e _ r PLACE ';,69:40 56.0 N_: 1st ADD. 969.4 At W Oc' =i z JP -50 964 .0 �� 7 ' t o �'�+ 971.Lf _ FiII I_ I -� Le'4� WALNUT m 8 5 8:0 _ f rQ3511 HILL �- 9 PARK -69 I 8�' �J✓//��jjj`ARK [ 893.6 KWOOp �� ;;^"�;-t•Ltl_I 887.8 I GHT^ OAK city of eagan 1�5 PUBLIC o WORKS 10 DEPARTME 1� JP -16 'JP -i7 •, �.TP -�� 874.7 858.0` A p +� 53l'/. !� 879./ 87/.D 1 WESCOTT 1 :1 STATION JP -18 \`�!�-� \' 862.0 = 860.0 '6 87/.0 W o} f•.�r �%i.Gr.� IS.,+.N a I_j " r'•.'y::::• _ 1st ADC n R.• y' ;: - - 883. \ 1 ��' �•• -55 / C / JP -5 856.0 :.J.•-54 "'� 6 864.4 • 85.4/ 852.2 �.. ' 857.4 � N �J N JP -2 843.3 849. ` J 1 25 ��++ P817.0 817.0% 820.7moo; 824.0„ 1 fAl -24 i AUDITOR'S SU JF'�-52 JP -68 862.0 1• 878.0 SUBJECT PARCEL ................ . BRIDLE RIDGE ADD. STORM SEWER MASTER P AN PARK j m :s FIG. #1 approved: standard plate #: ~r I DDITION 0 00 I / , r -�lT, t * I W f I�J_1J IArN. R:E _ Wcs' PCBI_IsNik�9° l ��bc:'ow : = I � w _..1.JC6D4 �._ �j T N - B:B II rSFnTT RC1f•n;/ �12 --\- I � .t_�..� r --:•- -- - , = Inu .. —i iv C - P P� 1 * w . .._ o Vic;"• '�. y of 13 12 241 ,I •46'► 0, C- ( 12"� C K r �I.00 56 i -� C -II 54 158 ru---- F �` I Ip"nuoiroRs sveo. No.a" BRIDLE RIDGE ADD. I SUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan SANITARY SEWER PUBLIC $ WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT]r'.yn FIG.. +2 approved: standard plate ##: 59 615/80.0 IS�T6/86.0 1496/66.0 4.5/43.0 0 68 te 141 2q 16* 200:7 9'e�- 240 -fiOPMEN-f -JAI 80 60 7-4" 1uQu PARK TOR 3.6/.2.0 f 1#0q� 8" U HILLS 48.9/66 17.1/32.0 61 10 M.G. ADDITION WEJCOTT 0 STORAGE WCARRIAGE U. H.W.L. 11059 !6 18 HILLS GOLF 16" ORE COURSE GA EN L TS K tj I All 3A ( L iD 43.3/60. -113 58.T (E240053.2/71.0 1 ,J- - - - - - - - - - - -- III 50.3/67.0 V" st D WEST PUBLI HiN / r/,. Ist ADD L F��JgT ":Z -,L-, - T 18"T LLJ FJOJI R)Arl./ 12" [2 .............. > 50.4/67.0 . ......... •Ld (as:) 53.1 /68.0 50.3/67.0 12" a > it'll* m** m"J OEM ... XX .... 7FO117 53 7/i F78 51.4/65.0 I �L_� 18.4/29.0 116 66.7/85.0 6 M.G. GROUND STORAGE 5000 G.P.M. BOOSTER H.W.L. 1059 183 Qio 42.2/58.0 Ld 162 2411 68.0/ 0/720 7 2 rO-i 20" J1020 18 1 7 .2 H it 30 jQD4 68.7/74.0 85.2/95,0 188 16C conn un ev BRIDLE RIDGE ADD. SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. *3 City of eagan WATER approved— standard PUBLIC plate #: — WORKS m &I -A MASTER PLAN 0 r -r -/Am 1 m CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT (Bridle Ridge) APPLICANT: SIENNA CORPORATION LOCATION: N 1/2 SECTION 24 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1987 1. REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS The preliminary plat will consist of approximately 123.3 acres and contain 203 single-family lots. The 203 lots will be divided into four neighborhoods - Cantor Glen, Carriage Pines, Surrey Woods, and Bridle Ridge. Cantor Glen Cantor Glen is proposed to contain 31.6 gross acres and 64 lots. Outlots A through D are proposed to be private open space and outlot E to be dedicated for public open space. The minimum lot size would contain 91700 square feet and the average lot size would contain 13,400 square feet. Minimum lot width is proposed to be 75' and the average lot width is proposed to be 87'. In review of their setback request, they are proposing to deviate from the setback criteria bf the City Ordinances in regard to side yards from public right-of-way, and side yards regarding house and garage setback requirements. Carriage Pines The Carriage Pines neighborhood is proposed to consist of 20.7 acres, contain 46 lots, and have a gross density of 2.2 dwelling units per acre. There are three outlots proposed. Outlots A and B would be private open space. Outlot C would be dedicated for public purposes. Again, the minimum lot size would consist of 9,700 square feet and an average lot size would consist of 14,400 square feet. The minimum width proposed is 75' and the average lot width is 881. Again, lots will deviate from the normal R-1 zoning requirements. The applicants are also proposing to deviate from the setback requirements of the R-1 district. A major deviation would be side yard setback from public right-of- way as well as minimum distance between houses. Surrey Woods The last of the four neighborhoods is proposed to --consist of 34.3 gross acres, contain 57 single-family lots, and have a gross density of 1.6 dwelling units per acre. Outlot A is proposed as private open space and outlot B as public open space. The minimum lot size in Surrey Woods is 1,800 square feet and the average lot size is 18,600 square feet. Minimum lot width is 75' and average lot width is 92'. This development appears to have picked up some additional land which was originally the Charles Mamer and Kenneth Gangl property. In this area it appears that four lots are to have direct access onto Wescott Road. All other lots would take access from interior streets. Again, the same setback criteria is being proposed as what is requested in the other subdivisions. Bridle Ridge The Bridle Ridge neighborhood is proposed to consist of 36.7 gross acres and contain 36 single-family lots. The gross density is 1.0 dwelling units per acre. Outlots A and B are proposed as private open space. Outlot C is dedicated for park purposes. The minimum lot size proposed in this neighborhood is 17,000 square feet and the average lot size is 23,500 square feet. Minimum lot width is at setback 100' and average lot width at setback 119'. •it appears that this neighborhood is proposed to be -a higher -test housing neighborhood with the additional lot width. and the square footage. . The applicants are. also proposing some deviation from the R -1 -setback -requiremen'ts regarding 15' between dwelling units. It appears that the setbacks from public right-of-way will be maintained within this neighborhood. T f GRADING/DRAINAGE: This development incorporates very hilly and rolling topography with elevation differentials approaching 65-70 feet in the southwest area and that portion adjacent to Wescott Road. The grading plan submitted proposes to limit their grading activity to only that which is necessary to install the internal streets and adjacent buildable sites. Major overall site grading will disturb the majority of the property located in the southwest portion of this development. In spite of the extreme topographies within this development, maximum slopes are being maintained at 3:1 with street grades not exceeding 8.0%. However, the proposed street grades of Surrey Woods Road and Bridle Ridge Road as they connect to Wescott Road do not match with the existing grade of Wescott Road. These will have to be revised on the final approved grading plan to provide better compatibility. In addition, the Bridle Ridge Road access to Wescott Road and the adjacent lots" and short cul-de-sac should be lowered by approximately 10+ feet to minimize entrance grades and backyard slopes down to Wescott Road. This would greatly reduce the resulting 3:1 backyard slopes with minimum environmental impact due to no significant vegetation existing in this area. While the major grading is confined to the street alignment and building pad, no grading of the proposed parkland dedication is indicated. It would be appropriate to perform thisgrading in conjunction with the development of this property to avoid major excavation adjacent to single family homes at a later date and insure compatibility of common property line elevations. On the east side of Elrene Road at its interection with Wescott Road, the developer is proposing to construct a 4 - 10 foot high retaining wall. It is recommended that this retaining wall be replaced with the proper 3:1 cut slope into the proposed Outlot A. All grading appears to be confined within the limits of this proposed development with no adjacent private property impacted. Approximately 11 acres of this site will drain north and west into the existing storm sewer within Wescott Road which discharges into Pond JP -19 to the west. Pond JP -19 presently does not have an outlet available. The remainder of the development will drain to the south and west into Pond JP -21 which also does not have an outlet available. Studies are presently being performed to initiate the lift station outlet from Pond JP -21 and the gravity outlet from Pond JP -19 during the 1987 construction season. However, because this development is contingent upon these outlets being provided, they must be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. There is no outlet being provided for the existing isolated backyard drainage basin (6.9 acres) located adjacent to Wescott Road between Surrey Woods Road and Bridle Ridge Road. While this drainage basin receives only backyard runoff and no storm sewer runoff, a percolation test should be performed to determine whether an empty lift station manhole should be constructed for potential future pumping, similar to the Windtree 5th Addition to the north. In the southwest corner, an additional storm sewer lateral shall be installed within Canter Glen Lane to provide a maximum gutter flow of 600 feet prior to discharging into any interceptor catch basin. UTILITIES: A 12" trunk water main exists within Wescott Road which is of sufficient size and pressure to service this development. A 12" trunk main will be required to be installed within Elrene Road, in addition to a 16" trunk main within Northview Park Road from its connection with Elrene Road. There presently does not exist any sanitary sewer facilities available to service this proposed development. It will require the installation of a major lift station to be located east of Dodd Road and north of Diffley with the force main outlet to discharge into the existing trunk sanitary sewer located at the intersection of Dodd and Diffley Roads. Sanitary sewer and water lateral facilities are being provided for future extensions to accommodate the overall phased development. There are no adjacent private properties that need to be provided with individual services under this development. The trunk sanitary sewer and water main collection/distribution system is necessary for the development of this proposal. Subsequently, it will be necessary to have the trunk facilities ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. STREETS/CIRCULATION: A comprehensive traffic generation and distribution study was performed for the overall Eagan Hill Farm P.U.D. concept. Theresult of that study indicates the need to upgrade Wescott Road to its ultimate four lane design section with a bituminous trail on the south side adjacent to this development. In addition, Elrene Road must be constructed to a minimum 36 foot street with a parking lane'and trailway along the east and north side of this extention to its ultimate connection with Dodd Road. It i -s also recommended that a collector road be extended southwesterly from Elrene Road to intersect with Northview Park Road. This should also be a minimum 36 foot wide with a parking lane and trailway located on.the west side. Nine of the proposed ten cul-de-sacs are necessary due to topography and/or boundary constraints. It is recommended that the "bubble" on Carriage Lane just west of Elrene Road be eliminated by a slightly tighter curve. Stub streets are being provided for future extension and continuity with the next phase development. This layout is also compatible with the proposed Boulder Ridge Addition to the east. However, all stub streets must have a temporary cul-de-sac constructed until such time that their extension has been scheduled. Due to a revision in the recommended alignment of Northview Park Road, it will not provide a direct connection to Elrene Road but (5Z, rather "T" into an intersection with a north/south collector from Elrene Road to the southern end of this development. Therefore, the short north/south collector street name should be changed accordingly. This development has provided good internal traffic circulation and f %15 eliminated any direct driveway access onto the proposed collector }� streets. a Due to the requirement of this development to be serviced by these collector streets, they must be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate a 50 foot half right-of-way for Wescott Road. It shall also dedicate a necessary 80 foot right-of-way for Elrene Road and the appropriate 40 foot half right-of-way for the north/south collector from Elrene Road from Northview Park Road at the southern portion of this development. All internal looped streets shall have a minimum 60 foot right-of- way and all cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum 55 foot radius. The extension and connection of Elrene Road and the installation of the sanitary sewer lift station and force main outlet on the east side of Dodd Road will require the acquisition of easements outside of the limits of the overall Eagan Hills Farm Development. Therefore, if this development cannot provide those easements necessary to install the streets and utilities to provide its service, it shall accept its pro rata per acre share of the cost of acquistion by the City. This development shall acquire all regulatory agency permits within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer has not been previously assessed over any of the property to be incorporated by this development. In addition, this development has not contributed to the construction of Wescott -Road as it presently exists. Due to the fact that this development requires the installation and/or upgrading of all trunk utilities and related collector streets, it is anticipated that all related trunk area assessments, lateral benefits and residential equivalent obligations will be identified in that public improvement process. Therefore, there are no additional assessment obligations to be identified at this time. MISCELLANEOUS CONCERNS: This development is proposing to create several outlots that will not be conveyed as a part of the City's park dedication requirements. The appropriate homeowners associations shall be established to ensure that the ownership and maintenance of these outlots are tied into the proposed newly created lots to eliminate the potential for tax forfeiture and future City maintenance and liability responsibilities. CONDITIONS BRIDLE RIDGE: 1. A 50' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Wescott Road. An 80' right-of-way shall be dedicated for Elrene Road. A 40' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for the north/south collector from Elrene Road to the future Northview Park Road at the southern boundary. 2. All internal loop streets shall have a minimum 60' right-of-way and all cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum 55' radius without a center island or a 65' minimum radius with a center island. 3. A lift station manhole and inlet pipe shall be constructed in the land locked drainage basin adjacent to Wescott Road between Surrey Woods Road and Bridle Ridge Road to accommodate a future temporary pump unless soil percolation tests verify this drainage basin's ability to be self-sufficient. 4. The northerly 600' of Bridle Ridge Road, related cul-de-sac and adjacent lots should be lowered approximately 10 feet to minimize the backyard slopes and access grades from Wescott Road. 5. The installation of trunk sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main facilities and required collector roads must be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 6 This development shall dedicate all required ponding easements and storm sewer utility easements as required by final approved utility construction and grading plans. 7. This development shall provide or assume its pro rate per acre share of costs associated with the 'acquisition of all street right-of-way, utility easements or ponding easements located outside of the boundaries of this development as necessary to provide street and utility service to this subdivision. 8. This development shall acquire all regulatory agency permits within the time frame required by the affected agency. 9. This development shall perform or provide all grading requirements necessary fo-r the full right-of-way width construction of the internal collector roads and adjacent parklands to City approved standards. 10. Any outlot not conveyed to the City park system shall be incorporated into a homeowners association as required by the City. 11. Final detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval. 12. Temporary cul-de-sacs shall be constructed at. the ends of all stub streets to City standards where their extension is not scheduled. 13. In addition to the required common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate with the final plat all drainage and utility easements located outside the public right-of-way. 14. An internal storm sewer lateral system shall be installed to insure interceptor catch basins are provided at least every 600 feet. 15. Surrey Woods Court, Carriage Circle and Coral Circle shall provide water main looping as required by.City staff. 16. Carriage Lane street alignment west of Elrene Road shall be revised to eliminate the proposed "bubble." 17. satisfactory findings and approvals are given on the EAW prior to any construction or grading of the sitee 18. -„A planned development agreement shall be entered into for the Bridle Ridge planned development, spelling out the deviations in the lot size requirements. 19. The City must authorize the installation of the major trunk utilities to this area/ I 20. A homeowners association must be established and documents reviewed and approved by the City in order that maintenance agreements have been established for the outlots and private ownership. 21 All standard plat conditions must be adhered to. 47 I'' . .• 2 - ' o N LI We x LU co co UJ L11 s •�.. 1 �( .Q7 _ � � '., ,CI i'' �1•.,,y as b ,1•f i-_, I. � ' � ,J ee - ��\', • '•q y � � v • L._ _L.. _ ff `l'� \, ..1`�2\.�`::" I I �I 1i i; - 1�a 1; r 1 �r �%a `'.�'' �J� �...�a 1S, if ..•i-^.�•.... �- `ati� -' .. _ - m-" _ _-•_, '. ;:^`'' - C'aI'' Ci 3?1��a: _ �{•'�` -_.moi 61, V , TV -------- �' _ C. l• �..' ! . ;fig'.' ,� � �,' ..O c>- _ ' l��f' ~ ����4 �'' ' Y� -_'" `_ 7-'•`.., ion :. %.• ' ;• -- �:�.�: ;T • ,'�l;S' it `11 •'-d.+. - 1 i. X15'•. '' (' . _ �": ��Sx�•..= _ -._ :`- `, ! y_-%' •' �,, :• rte.. R Y3 "V i 6" h 12" GOLF E - 0 / i 14 n "Oa'll GAR�)E�A I L 18pi S. 0 8731 1 - -- -i _ It. - - jQ #;If n. I i.i 1 hf !"M J-4', JP -59 887 1164,0 -42 879.7 887.1 888.1 r- JP - �60 -46 S�� 881.2 L 887.0 )2.3 L L.S. - 1! ?3.5 12* 1 .,JPI41 8870 JP -32 885.7 2 JP -31 888.111 10. 876.3 880.4 J -hl 40" 12 1" J -n 21-J m 1�p. � JP -58 1 j--mJP-58 E 8775 6 8822 TOV JP -30 879. 873D 4 JP -20 SOLIARE 852. z 855.6 J-0 dd V � PMQ' 080.0 1J5IN VI PLACE Ise ADD JP -133 PLACE JP -16 VK�sP T 874.7 JP -17 858.0 S A P 3t - T-1 1 It C3I(lot-O! 879.1 87ZO C WESCOTT G P-7 STATIO4 8164.0 JP-�8 V. .0 86 8 730 w M5 -OWN L ISN?;: !4i' 1 S AOr, GP -4 :x 88.4 55 ` // JP -56, 856.01 864.4 JP -21 815.3 ",-jX�P- 23 840.0 852.2 85Z4 20- NMTHvz.W JP -2 4C N 843.3 1 R K 00 849. ej, ti J - 3"4 -S P j JP 25 884.0 JP -53 JP -22 0% , i N �/ /.,. 817.0 86 820.7 824.0 88ft-04 840.0 -00 t: tea,: 0 a. JP -29 L.S.-18 926.0 945.0 T- FY -26 1896.0; 1904.0 6: Ol'i IIe 806.0' 224 21� J-1 ri j i ; ... . L 30 j-0 7. m J 4 �7--j il 30 TOR C1.1 -0 J V U P-28 E- A CU !--T A' S Sul N N 0 0-52 _qPLE 4' P-68 862D Pt '9 eo I, -� r�878.0 'Anow c; J -bb JP -50 $TT( EIJI /.-0 -964 9 7r" 7 864.3 10 PARK I 0 X891.3 4 NZ 1 LAKE k 893.6 6 KWOOD "ARK' 5.-24 I OM K 's nln n AL, j.: ............... SUBJECT PARCEL X. BRIDLE RIDGE ADD. ty of eagan PUBLIC STORM SEWER WORKS . , PLAN - 4V 161 2. R DEPARTMENMASTER I FIG. #1 approved •: standard I plate #: !rT L . 89g I WALNUTw ..3 BRIDLE RIDGE ADD. ty of eagan PUBLIC STORM SEWER WORKS . , PLAN - 4V 161 2. R DEPARTMENMASTER I FIG. #1 approved •: standard I plate #: 7CO Oji--- ut, ;I LH MAR�! !=Tz— - DDITION WESCOTT CARRIAGE HILLS '-,OLF GARDEN- ­ LATS C-'60 THEA EAGA AA� .IN ATPJAL .1 N -EE "000 N Z L 12 N -X 5 S A R A R SW 9:6:) 9 A x 9" N -A) TbA! 3 12 V WEST PUSLISPIN '7° 1-t 4 ..... . ... .4 ........... ......... ............. ............... .......... ..... ............. I .............. 112 I C - i iv .......... .. C -PP ...... W.., s.. b, J& 1e.... ..... ........ C F� 56 i 2. - . ` 1 IC-NI, C 21 ZM4-. 30 of eagan PUBLIC WORKS CO DEPARTME T ,-- i4 18t'AuDITOR'SSUED. NO. 4z 59 2 BRIDLE RIDGE ADD. SUBJECT PARCEL SANITARY SEWER MASTEB,-PLAN FIG.- +2 approved: standard�--.., I Plate #: - 80.0 1 I, ]w. R1 - 67 II 6 TO R 3.6/ 2.0 Lj HILLS I ADDITION WE COTT CARRIAGE n- 18 HILLS IEN GOLF COURSE GA LOTS ED 43.3/60,� 16- ) 24" LJ .-Z4 24 48 17.1/32.0-(:E5 '0 M. G. A/OUND STORAGE H.W.L. 1059 J; (' 5&3/67. III 5L _Z7 8. IFFTV. 6SIOT) An/1 ice: 50.4/67.0 116" (iD 54.6/71.0 0) 53.1/68.0 50.3/67.0 M%b Glaft �178) 51.4/65.0 73 18.4/29.0 izi - R -- --------- O-R� 6 M.G. GROUND STORAGE %b S14r 5000 G.RM. BOOSTER H.W. L. 1059 183 24" 182 68.0/ 01 0/720 7 101 20" it_ 12" jlQ84 )68.7/74.0 ^1 185 I city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS co DEPARTME 58.vgi. ----------- )PME1#' EftGAN ORE] PtA CE. SAR *63A 1 LJ p40 53.2/71.0 6 % WF_57 PUBLISHIN Ist ADD W w • 117 53.7 70 24 4e' 66.7/85.0 1QD42.2/58.0 85.2/95.0Q28)JIr" -7 % , I A t BRIDLE RIDGE ADD. K It 30 SUBJECT PARCEL FIG WATER MASTER PLAN standard approved plate #: — MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS TOM HEDGES, CITY AWD11STRATOR FROM: KEN YRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1987 HE: EAGAN HILLS FARM P.U.D. - BRIDAL RIDGE & STONE BRIDGE ADDITIONS The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed P.U.D. at both its January and February Commission meetings. The Development Committee met on January 28th to work on issues pertaining to the proposed neighborhood park and conducted a special Commission meeting on February 11th for the purpose of reviewing the P.U.D. and the proposed Bridal Ridge and Stone Bridge Additions. The main issue for the Commission pertained to the suitability of the neighborhood park and proposed green belt. The initial proposal in the P.U.D. x did not provide sufficient parkland with suitable depths to provide for adequate facility sizings. Second, the park was in a low area requiring significant fill. The developer has responded to both concerns by: 1) agreeing to adjust the proposed Elrene Road alignment, allowing for greater park depth; 2) has agreed to provide fill/grading of the central park area in conjunction with the gross grading of the project. By notation, on the preliminary plat, the proposed Elrene Road is to be moved approximately 20' in the final plat process. Movement of the road/curvature is north and west of the intersection with Northview Park Road. Relative to the proposed open space - the Commission has agreed to accept the area as described, assuming that the proposed trail linkages are not impacted by the bounce of the ponding areas. This open space is taken as "partial credit." Specific credit has not been calculated, but agreed to in the overall conditions of acceptance of the parks dedication which shall also include a cash dedication of $100,000. Mr. Rod Hardy proposed to the Commission, the land dedications as depicted by parcels #1 - #5 and the $100,000 cash dedication. The cash dedication is to be made "up front" and is to be included as part of the bonding package for streets and utilities. This bonded amount is to be spread to the land as an assessment. Speaking in favor of the cash dedication up front, the Commission noted that this would provide the funding for development of the park simultaneously with developmet of the residential area. 4' P' COMMISSION'S RECOMMEENDATION The Advisory Commission has recommended to the City Council to: (1) accept parkland parcels #1 & #2 with the platting of the first phase developments of Bridal Ridge and Stone Bridge Additions. The Commission made a second motion to recommend: (1) conceptual acceptance of parcels #3, #4, and #5 as proposed in the P.U.D. subject to a trailway around the ponds and a cash amount of $100,000 to be financed by bonding as proposed. It is also recommended that this development be responsible for trail/sidewalks on Northview Park Road, Wescott Road, and Elrene Road consistent with the City's trailway plan. For additional information and discussion concerning Commission's actions, please refer to the minutes of January 89 February 5 and the special minutes of February 11, 1987. Respectfully submitted, i Director of Parks & Recreation KV/js �- r APC Minutes February 24, 1987 Voracek moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to staff conditions. Member McCrea indicated her position that the plat would be a great place for upper income housing. Gustafson, Voracek and Krisnik voted aye; Trygg, Wilkins, McCrea and Harrison voted nay. The chair casting the deciding vote based upon his position that the outlot should be zoned R-1 along with the remainder of the plat. The motion died for lack of majority. Wilkins asked if the developer would consider a continuance in order to resolve the issues. Mr. Sellergren indicated that the developer preferred to go before the council. Wilkins moved to recommend denial on the basis that the six acre northeasterly parcel would have to be developed commercially due to the proposed layout and there is already too much commercial property within the City. McCrea seconded the motion based on her belief that the property should be developed for more "high test" housing. Trygg, Wilkins, McCrea and Krisnik voted aye; Gustafson and Voracek voted nay. The motion was passed. BRIDLE RIDGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 The next public hearing convened by Chairman Harrison was in regard to the lt`' w application of Sienna Corporation for a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family Planned Development) and a preliminary plat consisting of 143 acres with 203 single family lots on the north half of Section 24. Mr. David Sellergren described the proposal, indicating that there were only 8 lots under the 85 foot width requirements and the development included 36 "executive" lots. Member Trygg questioned the request for a variance from the 15 foot side yard setback. James Hill indicated that the purpose was to allow the garage to be in line with the home. After some discussion, Mr. Rod Hardy indicated the developer would waive that request. It was explained that a Homeowners Association would be required in order to control private open space planned• within the development. In response.to Chairman Harrison's questions, the developer indicated that there were 21 of the 203 lots that do not comply fully with the R-1 requirements. McCrea moved, Trygg seconded the, motion to recommend denial of the rezoning based upon the ability to comply with R-1 requirements. Trygg, McCrea and Wilkins voted yes; Gustafson, Voracek, Krisnik and Harrison voted no. The motion failed. Voracek moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning to R-1 PD. Voracek, Gustafson, Krisnik and Harrison voted aye; Trygg, McCrea and Wilkins voted nay, and the motion carried. 0- APC Minutes February 24, 1987 Trygg moved to recommend denial of the preliminary plat and McCrea seconded the motion, based on the ability to create full size R-1 lots. Trygg, Wilkins and McCrea voted yea, Gustafson, Voracek, Harrison and Krisnik voted no. The motion died. Gustafson moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A 50 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Wescott Road. An 80 foot right-of-way shall be dedicated for Elrene Road. A 40 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for the north/south collector from Elrene Road to the future Northview Park Road at the southern boundary. 2. All internal loop streets shall have a minimum 60 foot right-of-way and all cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum 55 foot radius without a center island or a 65 foot minimum radius with a center island. 3. A lift station manhole and inlet pipe shall be constructed in the land locked drainage basin adjacent to Wescott Road between Surrey Woods Road and Bridle Ridge Road to accommodate a future temporary pump unless soil percolation tests verify this drainage basin's ability to be self-sufficient. 4. The northerly 600 feet of Bridle Ridge Road, related cul-de-sac and adjacent lots should be lowered approximately 10 feet to minimize the backyard n slopes and access grades from Wescott Road. 5. The installation of trunk sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main facilities and required collector roads must be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 6. This development shall dedicate all required ponding easements and storm sewer utility easements as required by final approved utility construction and grading plans. 7. This development shall provide or assume its pro rate per acre share of costs associated with the acquisition of all street right-of-way, utility easements or ponding easements located outside of the boundaries of this development as necessary to provide street and utility service to this subdivision. 8. This development shall acquire all regulatory agency permits within the time frame required by the affected agency. 9. This development shall perform or provide all grading requirements necessary for the full right-of-way width construction of the internal collector roads and adjacent parklands to City approved standards. 10. Final detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval. 10 APC Minutes February 24, 1987 11. Temporary cul-de-sacs shall be constructed at the ends of all stub streets to City standards where their extension is not scheduled. 12. In addition to the required common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate with the final plat all drainage and utility easements located outside the public right-of-way. 13. An internal storm sewer lateral system shall be installed to insure interceptor catch basins are provided at least every 600 feet. 14. Surrey Woods Court, Carriage circle and Coral Circle shall provide water main looping as required by City staff. 15. Carriage Lane street alignment west of Elrene Road shall be revised to eliminate the proposed "bubble". 16. Satisfactory findings and approvals are given on the EAW prior to any construction or grading of the site. 17. A planned development agreement shall be entered into for the Bridle Ridge planned development, spelling out the deviations in the lot size requirements. 18. The City must authorize the installation of the major trunk utilities to this area. 19. A homeowners association must be established and documents reviewed and approved by the City in order that maintenance agreements have been established for the outlots and private ownership. 20. All standard plat conditions must be adhered to. Gustafson, Voracek, Harrison and Krisnik voted in favor; Trygg, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. The motion passed. ROCKWOODS ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing convened was on the request of Jane and Samuel Rockwood for rezoning from R-2 (Planned Development) to R-1 (Single Family) and preliminary plat consisting of two -lots on 5.4 acres, abutting Oak Pond Hills Park on the east and north of Cliff Road, in the southeast quarter of Section 26. Mr. Runkle described the proposed lot split meeting all R-1 requirements and not presently served by bituminous streets, water and sanitary sewer. There being no comments from the'owner or the public, the public hearing was closed. McCrea moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning. All voted yes. McCrea then moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 9 Council Minutes March 3, 1987 9. The southerly access s"''d'eve]anent shall be restricted to a right -in entrance only and ert]Et�zced through p: viper signage in accordance with City design standards. 10: Permits shall be obtairie3::::o.-paica' County and Northern Natural Gas Company for all grading con taineif:`•ti:h:::::'their jurisdictional area prior to construction or final plat approval in accordance with their requirements. 11. A revised grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted showing the limits of grading associated with Lot 1 and temporary connection to existing elevatiq"is:::: :•:•: :•:::.,:::.::::::::::: 12. The extensive retaining WA*J.ls regi:ired shall be constructed in accordance with City design standards..:. 13. This development shall::be;:`'espogs:z�l:e for any outstanding, unlevied or deferred assessments or dzE :&e- finiiic'X;dl"obligations associated with this development. 14. The main entrance to this site shall have a maximum width of 30 feet and radii of 20 feet. 15. That developer and owte::::•sball enter, into an agreement to guarantee', that the service bays will 15e::::� ::opiex:a.tion at any time when fuel sales are made through the gas pumps. 16.. The northerly side of the:':. huli:$:::will be designed and constructed in a manner architecturally :.�gris:kstnt'' with the front elevation of the building. All councilmembers voted in favor. Egan then moved, Smith seconded the motion to approve the conditional use permit for a self-service gas...tation•. ;fo:r. Lot 1, according to all ordinance and normal city requirements. �1':1:::.V. 2:::: ns::::::: EAGAN HILLS FARMS:::- CONC .eTUAL PLAN STONE BRIDGE & BRIDLE RAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS Tom Hedges introduced the proposed conceptual plan for roadway alignment, utility layout and park land dedication for the Eagan Hills Farms project, south of Wescott Road and west of Dodd Road. He stated that. the Planning Commission had taken no formal action concerning the conceptual plan, and was intended for Planning Commission and Council zit"'ormation purposes only. Dale Runkle indicated that.•the:•:;:•1:aned•.:•..�velopment application has been withdrawn and that an EAW for ?i3:i isions, including Stone Bridge and Bridle Ridge is now being processed.""' o•'EIS will be processed for Eagan Hills Farms at the present time. Council Minutes March 3, 1987 Dave Sellergren, together f'tii' ''Ro3 11a=dpi:::: and John Hankenson of Sienna Corporation, Ron Helmer Q United Mortgage, Wayne Tauer of Pioneer Engineering, and Jim Hill of Jagre,s Hill Engineers, were also present. Dave Sellergren made a preseri: t i3ra:::<:%::- ej�alf of the developers discussing feasibility of the project and 'fi'ei}:f:s: fo the community at large. He. displayed various schematics covering the- developments, including utilities, streets, park dedication proposed, etc. He noted that Park No. 1 and Park No. 2 are proposed to be dedicated with the two present developments and briefly described the overall plan introduced to the City in 1986. He also explained that the developers intend to: folp:ia::trrigh:::with the Council's objectives, including some executive type hiSus-Ing':::::::'' Regarding the application for ;.approval.. of the Stone Bridge Planned Development, including rezoning and::pte1imi :zy plat approval, he noted that the 96.45 acre parcel would ine:ii3:9 :t1C:tiiat 13 acres will be dedicated consisting 18%, according to h s'-'calculaC nq::-'with 160 lots over 12,000 square foot minimum size. The average square footage per lot will be 15,550 square feet with 2.03 gross units per acre and 2.44 net units per acre, excluding street right—of—way only. 146 lots will exceed 13,000 square feet, 24 that are 20,000 square feet or larger. He described the larger lots being spread out with many facing parks or law land areas often consisting of the more.. sensitive areas. The house::::::s'r'.iee: range will be from $110,000.00 to' $160,000.00 projected. Wayne Tauer described the interi[: to retail::::the natural terrain, and noted it is designed for neighborhoods r:*thea.':::thaf:lot sizes. Larger lots would be located where they are spreadou. •::t�±:aisghbiit the development and would be located primarily where natural::::aiueti'ties exist. Relating to the Bridle Ridge Planned Development application, including rezoning and preliminary plat, the 123.3 acre parcel would include 203 lots with some outlots proposed primarily along the major streets. Councilmembers were concerned about the poter}t.ial :.; for ... .t�ax :::forfeiture of the outlots that would be owned by a homeowner•:•: S:::aso-cakk:sj:;:::::Mr. Sellergren stated that the lots can be eliminated and that the '.'•Iaiid:'%•be included as part of the residential lots. 51 lots in Bridle Ridge would excec*!tj::: 20,000::square feet in size, the park dedication would consist of approximately 10::of the gross area with 182 of 203 lots over 12,000 square feet. 140 lots would exceed 13,000 square feet with 1.65 gross units per acre and 2'.0 net units per acre excluding street only. The average lot size would be 16,890 square feet, with $28,000 to $42,000 wholesale prices per lot to builders. Housing prices would range from $110,000.00 to $225,000.00 per unit. He furthi*::mentioned that 36 lots could be executive home size. The drainage issues -ff:-the northeast corner of Stone Bridge have been resolved accord• og:; zo: Ztg.:.::;;Sje;i:Lergren, and there is no intent that the developer request the COii:a%;at:• to the use of Outlot A at the northeast corner. /10 Council Minutes March 3, 1987 Mayor Blomquist asked about::::t-fie'' -'-'O&E'1'ots ":$4- Bridle Ridge and had concerns about tax forfeiture and fiyj�*ther objected::tio- the outlots being retained in that fashion. She further noted -%that if the:p;vposed commercial parcel is not addressed, it leaves future uncrt.ainty and soiild be addressed at the present time. Mr. Sellergren stated that;:::t e:::dey;eliU-&r would allow for street linkage to the northeast outlot and the MajrbX:iiai<eid:'a large amount of commercial land on Diffley Road existing at the present time. Statistically, 41% of 81 lots were 85 foot minimum lot width in Stone Bridge and 25% or 55 lots are under 85 foot minimum lot width in Bridle Ridge. Councilman Wachter statedChat"'fie':: s .:.:titw.irr the impression that a large percentage of the lots were planri& for;;:::oversized lots according to the information submitted in the fall of t986. _ .Councilman Egan indicated the plans do not meet the intent of the: :lots fq:r executive size housing, and do not merit City consideration ::E.ar;:speti:a]::: et.�fo:i7ts to deviate from the minimum requirements which are intended :-to- -e'ncourage::::h'igh test housing. Councilman Ellison suggested more active park use land may be desirable and also suggested encouraging larger side yard setbacks. John Hankinson on behalf •:o.f Sienna Corporation, stated that all lots_ complied with the 85 foot minimi ;::-jo:;Bridle Ridge, and that 57 additional lots' would be permi-tted. In Bridle Ridge, the density is;i;:;2.0 un•xsper net acre, excluding roads, with 2.58 net acres excluding parks::,:..utility easements. In Stone Bridge, the net un:kU':-X'` r acre is 2.4 excluding roads, and 3.14 excluding all dedicated areas.'' Rod Hardy stated that attempts have been made to work with landscaping and that the width of the streets is proposed to be reduced. He further noted that a Petition is being suhmi.tted...•for;.the,;installation of the utilities at the present time throughout Wachter requested more information about the use of the :proposed `park land, and Mayor Blomquist suggested a 12,000 square foot miniq" must: ::he reviewed carefully; further, that the outlots and the northeast comd'* cial :eicea be designed with potential for residential lots. A question it.;o aris as to whether the Planning Commission should consider. the developments again if there are substantial changes. Councilman Smith noted it would, be desirable that the planned development for the entire Eagan Hills Farms would be most.desirable for a review of the entire development. Scattered large lots may practical to begin with, but he strongly questioned the development of:::::10 cul-de-sacs and suggested possible connections of some o£...t1hem:;:.w'thin::.t:he.:;developments. Screening along Wescott Road was an issue :;:::t;i:::;:;a:::::f t widths for streets was also discussed. /I/ Council Minutes March 3, 1987 Mr, Sellergren recommended:::::::phii,:*:*:'Cfliilffd*il*'*::ikbntinue the applications until further information is submittid3d Tom Hedges suggested requiringcertain :uE#nimum housing sizes and he was also strongly concerned about'::::tki:•:•::Ci3:::st aff load at the present time to process the extensive changes thaf':aY:e:::j�ig,''suggested. Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to continue the Stone. Bridge application until the next regular Council meeting, with the understanding that all information requested by the City Council described above, shall be submitted timely for staff review and comment prior to the next regular meeting. All members voted in favor. Egan then moved, Ellison seconded :::::the mat:ion to continue the application regarding Bridle Ridge until the nex.t,;regular,:meeting on the same conditions as those described regarding Stone B;;-$ge. AU:Auembers voted yes. ROCKWOODS ADDITION- REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT An application for rezoning of 5.3 acres currently designated R-2 within Lexington South PD to R-1 Single Family, and preliminary plat creating two lots came to the Council fox.. its review. Dale Runkle described ,the. application and noted that the:::::::Cvtq.;.;,lots have access_ to unimproved Lakewood' Hills Drive. There is no sari itai:y:::sewer or water main available to service the proposed development, and there.fore'*gi,tiuti:site septic system and private well would be provided. CountUman $mitis:: had concerns about future subdivision, including future road :'&n eefi:ko:rtS 3n the general area. Smith moved, Egan seconded :lie "motion to continue the application until the next regular. meeting to allow a review by the staff and the applicants of any possible overlay of the plat that may have been done by an earlier owner, and to determine whether it would comply with logical development in the area, and further to direct the staff to prepare a rough sketch for future development. All voted in favor..., LEXINGTON POINTE ADDITION ; REZONING:& PRELIMINARY PLAT The application of Tri -Land Propel:ties f6t:: amendment to Lexington South Planned Development, rezoning from CSC to PD R: -:::and preliminary plat approval next was discussed by the councilmembers. It was suggested by the applicant that the application be delayed until March 17, 1987. Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to continue the applications until March 17, 1987 as requested. After further discussion, however, the motion was withdrawn. 9 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT/ROCRWOODS ADDITION D. Rezoning from R-2 within Lexington South P.D. to R-1 and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of Two (2) Lots --A public hearing was held by the APC at their February 24 meeting to consider the Rockwoods Addition and a recommendation for approval was recommended to the City Council. At the March 3, 1987 City Council meeting, both the rezoning and preliminary plat were continued and the City Planner was directed to review the proposed Rockwoods Addition and determine whether an allowance should be made for any future street connection through that land area and further whether the proposed development is best suited for the long range development of that area. For a memp and drawing as prepared by the City Planner, refer to pages through 116 . For a copy of staff reports, parkland dedication and APC action, refer to pages �([� through.. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny: 1. the rezoning from R-2 to R-1 and 2. the preliminary plat entitled Rockwoods Addition. /0 MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: JIM STURM DATE: MARCH 13, 1987 SUBJECT: ROCKWOODS ADDITION At the March 3 City Council meeting, this proposal was continued to allow staff time to review further subdivision possibilities for this site. The area is heavily wooded and has some very severe slopes. The only possible access to this site can be from the unimproved Lakewood Hills Drive. It is highly unlikely that the residents will petition for public improvements of the road, requiring them to connect to City utilities. Also, the existing 60' right-of-way has some extreme horizontal angles not to mention vertical curve design problems. R-1 districts require a 1 -acre minimum lot size for areas without sewer and water. The Rockwood's do not foresee additional sub- division except for the possibility of giving their daughter a 1 -acre parcel in the future. By platting now, the Rockwoods will be able to do a simple Waiver of Plat to create that parcel. It has been policy to only allow Waivers for the creation of 1 lot from an existing platted lot. At that point, all 3 parcels will have a minimum 100' frontage and conform to all R-1 standards. V . /� Planning Department JS/j j 1 W PAR K CO r i L N - 44qARK PAR K CO r i L N CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT (ROCRWOODS ADD.) APPLICANT: JANE AND SAMUEL ROCKWOOD LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 26 EXISTING ZONING: (R-2) WITHIN THE LEXINGTON SOUTH P.D. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of 5.3 acres currently designated R-2 within the Lexington South P.D. to an R-1 (Single Family) district and a preliminary plat creating two lots. The existing Land Use Plan has this area designated R-1 and the recently adopted plan is the same with the D-1 designation. SITE PLAN: These two lots have access on to unimproved Lakewood Hills Drive which also services Oak Pond Hills to the south and Lakewood Hills to the west. The Sheffield subdivision is to the north and Oak Pond Hills Park is to the east. The site is dominated by Pond LP -34 with the entire site sloping towards it. Gradual to some rather steep 3:1 and greater slopes characterize these lots. Oak species and und.erstory native plant material are the most significant vegetation. The new lot with 100' of frontage will be 1.3 acres in size with the existing parcel becoming a 4 acre lot. All R-1 lot requirements have been met. Code requires R-1 districts to have a one acre minimum lot size for areas without municipal sewer and Vater. UTILITIES: There is presently no sanitary sewer or water main available to service this proposed development or the surrounding Lakewood Hills Addition. Subsequently, an on-site septic system and private well will have to be installed in accordance with City and State standards to provide proper service to this newly created lot. GRADING/DRAINAGE: There is no site development grading proposed with this subdivision other than what would be required to construct a single family house on this lot. A 1 1 drainage is presently directed into Pond LP -34, located on the eastern edge of this development. This pond recently had its controlled water outlet installed under Project 444 (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer). Therefore, there are no drainage concerns, provided any proposed house has its lowest walkout elevation constructed above 890.0. //b UV k-1115 11CW UeVe1Upllienc W111 oe providea oy way of the existing Lakewood Hills Drive which is an unimproved gravel road street below existing city standards for public street access. Although it is located within public right-of-way, the homeowners within the Lakewood Hills Addition assume all maintenance responsibilities through an informal cooperative understanding (no formal homeowners association). It is not recommended that the street be upgraded until such time that sanitary sewer, water main and lateral storm sewer facilities are installed. Subsequently, the addition of this one newly created lot should not create any additional burden to this existing substandard, privately maintained street. EASEMENTS/PERMITS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY: With adequate right-of-way being previously dedicated for Lakewood Hills Road, no additional right- of-way dedication is anticipated. The installation of the private water and sewer system shall be in accordance with WPC 40 and all other regulatory agency requirements. A- ponding easement shall be dedicated incorporating the 890.0 elevation for Pond LP -34 located along the eastern portion of this development. ASSESSMENTS: No trunk area sanitary sewer or water main assessments have been levied over this property. Although it is not anticipated that these trunk area facilities will be installed in the foreseeable future, it is recommended that this development prepay their trunk area sanitary sewer and water related assessments. There is presently a pending trunk area storm sewer assessment associated with the recent Holland Lake trunk outlet. The underlying parcel was provided a large lot credit in determining the amount of the assessment. However, with this new development and its requirement to dedicate additional ponding area, this pending assessment should be revised to reflect the new 1987 rates and the additional ponding easements, while still providing the large lot credit where applicable (Lot 2). These revised and additional assessment obligations are further clarified as follows: ITEM QUANTITY RATE AMOUNT PROJECT Trunk Area Water 1 Lot $600/Lot $600.00 -- Trunk Area Sanitary 1 Lot $625/Lot $625.00 -- Pending Trunk Area Storm Sewer 121,100 SF* (Lot 2) $0.053/SF $2,623.50** 444 Pending Trunk Area Storm Sewer 35,600 SF* (Lot 1) $0.053/SF $1,888.00 444 TOTAL $5,736.50 * Estimated ponding easement credits of 53,150 SF, (Lot 2) and 21,000 SF (Lot 1) were applied. ** Large lot credit applied for first 16,500 SF of each acre (49,500 SF assessable). ' Final assessment obligation shall be calculated based on the areas contained in the final plat documented at .the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. CONDITIONS ROCKWOODS ADDITION: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication fee. 3. A ponding easement shall be dedicated to incorporate the 890.0 elevation. 4. This development shall assume the related trunk area sanitary sewer and water assessments and accept the financial obligation of the revised trunk area storm sewer assessments in accordance wit -h the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval as calculated by the final plat dimensions. 5. On site septic and private well systems shall be constructed in accordance with WPC 40 and all other regulatory agency rules and regulations. 0, - ;AUDITOR'S SURD. NO. 42 IEW 34 A I6AKESiOE PAFtEC KWOOD.'"'PA -_ •t'a`r — SO.OAKS 4 f '} I wtxriwK' �- 1 r ? 3O i .� w� •iii M f � I � NB D -11 D 1 1 CPD —1. D_II lr�t `� _D—II •1 a, P-1 I /�+y��,�,�� �. :r,• F PRELIMINARY PLAT ROCKWOOD'S WOODS ADDITION DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LANDSURVEYOR Registered Under Laws of The State of Minnesota 14515 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL P.O. BOX M ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 66066 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE H(_Ir= F 1 `LD o. ,✓oelY 4 1,V6- -5A0 5E%¢ �, .. too o 'y 3 00 \ 0c pp CJ y L7 '7 r _ C Q 400 1' h p 0 Wdy `+t4, 1S s ,4Ftir C A F\ I ^^�� I J I LJ fu `I J I 1 � I O O 1 Sw enaw 7e do % 330 _ ME Sheet 1 of 3 #18:113-1111 PHONE 612 423-1760 Zoo ; Sl7 �S6 •.S2 w gFCa�,✓EYZ 5% �. eo. Mod.) Sov ,C/�✓E 5% s��¢, 5782,1- .6 'V y t.a hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation Y Y 04 r / Of a survey of the above shown property. MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NO. 8625 January 12, 1987 I� 3 �\ o O 00 Zoo ; Sl7 �S6 •.S2 w gFCa�,✓EYZ 5% �. eo. Mod.) Sov ,C/�✓E 5% s��¢, 5782,1- .6 'V y t.a hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation Y Y 04 r / Of a survey of the above shown property. MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NO. 8625 January 12, 1987 I� 3 OF 1 QF BEC. 2B 1 1— i01 woo 886 � .r.r'': - �• +�—• � I �� �`�\` 1 1 ++lig 1 y.. N.W. ■ 883 1 I LLL!, 40 � i���?� ` �•�lM�'11 \ � ,\' � � � ; \l )1 4 � j Vii' I.l�r A.r•' ''•',� oe 42 cr � _•,, �` Iii / � I -- 1 Al, i r Iw _ � a - \a 926.0 a' 945.0 P=26 �896.0� 904.0' 24.a _ I d a�_. ak 3C P-51 J-t - 30• d 76.0 ar (AUDITOR'S SU 9! 0 LP-43 ` 80.0 ;J-ee ni _ KENSINL ;UP-28 " 0 - 851.1 1 _v.... 3 853.8 PLACE _'"956.0 Ne ��i - DbL6 JP-52 J ` 1st ADD. 69.4 �,,.. JP-68 862.0 �, �.. °r.r"', 496 878.0 6, • - � I Z' J P-50 �y E�_ER 964.0 y ` G�'� �� 971.7 1 fir 9, 4-3. r•, * IF Com- o WALNUT I - I ^Wft f I - * _ AKL'510 P, 884.5 PARK 81.3.. 6AN2 LAKE " , 'r2 l RK L, 69 i1 93.6 KwOOD B ARK + _ BB, br�El LLND% P%PO 04ys n 21 6), 6:o LP P.31'`: .2 . �, 878.3 i�•; SO.OAKS (j,7.8 '` I eeos �E P-3 4 PARK srao-�, s� `891 F Qi M e 886. OVERHIL' J L CO) ` 79.� BB9.6 p$ i JtD J 6�2 p. & �r -917.4. &-26 a 86 , r,F,�,. _L► _1_>! j LP-65�� --�-=9/s17= IL t-a- °o ._� i. 882:5 LP-28 n i �, 910.7 i�I ,P�t 865 08 I, r 915.0 r I LP-68 I �� 878.5 I i LP0- h/ -20 �JAKOTA ' 11 COUNTY LP-21. LP 24 915.4ly PA R K903.01 902 5 $ 8g8g33 22 , 9/T,3 \2 1 4 EXCEPTION --_ -_ -D D L' 0 (NOT INCLUDED LP-19 r = �1 903.0 ylw 922.0 INL�-R H . E `I`� 908. P-22 MA • 901.0 - - - ro 904.0 12 925.31 913:7 �� LP-66 PARK 820P-17 „r ------ - I - -- - - - _ . . t LP-16 �...� V R0c!/'E M UN SUBJECT PARCEL ROCKWOODS ADD. FIG. # 1 city Of eaganapproved: standard0 ' PUBLIC ORM SEWER p #� $ S1-WORKS ZZ °° DEPARTMENTI MASTER PLAN APC Minutes February 24, 1987 11. Temporary cul—de—sacs shall be constructed at the ends of all stub streets to City standards where their extension is not scheduled. 12. In addition to the required common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate with the final plat all drainage and utility easements located outside the public right—of—way. 13. An internal storm sewer lateral system shall be installed to insure interceptor catch basins are provided at least every 600 feet. 14. Surrey Woods Court, Carriage circle and Coral Circle shall provide water main looping as required by City staff. 15. Carriage Lane street alignment west of Elrene Road shall be revised to eliminate the proposed "bubble". d 16. Satisfactory findings and approvals are given on the EAW prior to any construction or grading of the site. 17. A planned development agreement shall be entered into for the Bridle Ridge planned development, spelling -out the deviations in the lot size requirements. 18. The City must authorize the installation of the major trunk utilities to this area. 19. A homeowners association must be established and documents reviewed and approved by the City in order that maintenance agreements have been established for the outlots and private ownership. 20. All standard plat conditions must be adhered to. Gustafson, Voracek, Harrison and Krisnik voted in favor; Trygg, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. The motion passed. ROCKWOODS ADDITION — REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing convened was on the request of Jane and Samuel Rockwood for rezoning from R-2 (Planned Development) to R-1 (Single Family) and preliminary plat consisting of two -lots on 5.4 acres, abutting Oak Pond Hills Park on the east and north of Cliff Road, in the southeast quarter of Section 26. Mr. Runkle described the proposed lot split meeting all R-1 requirements and not presently served by bituminous streets, water and sanitary sewer. There being no comments from the owner or the public, the public hearing was closed. McCrea moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning. All voted yes. McCrea then moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 0 APC Minutes February 24, 1987 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication fee. 3. A ponding easement shall be dedicated to incorporate the 890.0 elevation. 4. This development shall assume the related trunk area sanitary sewer and water assessments and accept the financial obligation of the revised trunk area storm seer assessments in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval as calculated by the final plat dimensions. 5. On site septic and private well systems shall be constructed in accordance with WPC 40 and all other regulatory agency rules and regulations. All members voted affirmatively. DELARIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Harrison called the public hearing in regard to the request for a conditional use permit requesting a drive-through facility and pylon sign for a Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant located on Lot 2, Block 1, Mari Acres 2nd Addition, abutting Cliff Road to the south in the southwest quarter of Section 30. City Planner Runkle introduced the proposal and described the efforts made by the developer and staff to arrive at the best circulation plan for the drive-through restaurant. It was noted that in addition to the conditional use permits for a drive-through and pylon sign, a variance was being requested for the reduction of a 5 foot setback adjacent to the Cedar Ave. Freeway. In response to questions, the developer indicated the trash would be enclosed in a brick enclosure of the same construction as the building. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the request for a conditional use permit for a drive-through facility,_ including a 5 foot variance adjacent to Cedar Avenue and subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed grading plan shall be submitted for approval with the building permit application. 2. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and approved prior to the building permit release. 3. That the curb alignment in the parking area shall be revised according to the staff recommendations, creating additional green space in the northeast corner of the lot. All voted in favor. r1WH=JER 10 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen BLUE BELL ICE CREAM REQUEST A. Request from Blue Bell Ice Cream Incorporated to Operate on Public Streets Within the City of Eagan --At a regular City Council meeting held on Tuesday, July 1, 1986, Blue Bell Ice Cream Incorporated was given approval to operate ice cream trucks on public streets throughout the City of Eagan. This action is referenced as a variance or exception to the no solicitors regulation of the City Code. There were a number of conditions set forth by the City Council all of which are outlined in the attached letter that was sent to Mr. Baron, representing the Blue Bell Ice Cream Company and dated July 7, 1986. This letter is enclosed on page /;/., for your reference. The City has received a request from Blue Bell Ice Cream Inc., to operate on public streets in 1987. The Director of Finance/City Clerk has reviewed the matter with Chief of Police Berthe and according to Mr. Berthe, he is not aware of any problems in 1986 and would be comfortable with similar operations for 1987. For a copy o�+faa memo prepared by the Finance Director/City Clerk, refer to page Please note in the attached July 7, 1986 letter that an indication was given to Mr. Baron that the City Council would consider an ordinance that would address these conditions and any other language that might be desired if food and beverage vehicles were to be allowed in the future. This proposed ordinance revision has not been studied by staff and it may be in the best interest of the City Council to not revise the ordinance if it is the City Council's desire to review each and every request on a case by case.basis. However, if it is the City Council's desire for these types of requests to be handled administratively, then an ordinance amendment would be appropriate. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a variance/exception to the solicitation section of the City Code, allowing Blue Bell Ice Cream Inc. to operate on public streets within the City of Eagan according to conditions as outlined. Note: The City Council should determine a date in which Blue Bell Ice Cream can begin operating on public streets since a start up date was not addressed in the July 7, 1986 letter. Iz5 J.lull 2oFeagan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER July 7,-1986 Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE .. r City Clerk MR GLEN BARON BLUE BELL ICE CREAM INC 3218 SNELLING AVE MPLS MN 55406 Re: Approval for Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc. to Operate On Public Streets Within the City of Eagan Dear Mr. Baron: In official' action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on Tuesday, July 1, 1986, Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc., was given approval to operate ice cream trucks on public streets throughout the City of Eagan. The action was taken subject to. the following conditions: 1) sub- mission of an insurance certificate providing the level of liabil- ities outlined in a letter from Mid -Continent Agencies, Inc., to the City of Eagan dated April 16, 1986; 2) hours of operation will be noon to 15 minutes prior to sunset; 3) the approval is granted until October 1, 1986; 4) the trucks will not generate a noise level greater than 65 decibels; 5) caution swing arms will be required on. each vehicle; 6) local employment will be used for drivers operating in Eagan. The City Council has directed our Police Department to record any and all complaints that may be received regarding operation of the ice cream truck. It is' the City Council's desire to consider an ordinance sometime after October l that would address the aforementioned conditions and any other language they might desire if food/beverage vehicles are to be allowed in the future. If you have any questions regarding the action taken by the City Council, feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, yc Thomas L. Hedg es City Administrator cc: Jay Berthe, Chief of Police /71 E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk/Director of Finance THE LONE OAK TREE...THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: MARCH 6, 1987 SUBJECT: REQUEST OF BLUE BELL ICE CREAM, INC. TO OPERATE ON PUBLIC STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF EAGAN I was finally able to make contact with Mr. Glen Baron in response to the message he left for you in late February. His request was to be placed on the City Council Agenda for review of his permit request. In discussing the matter with Mr. Baron I have determined that he is agreeable to operating under the same conditions that were imposed last year. Please see the attached copy of your letter to him listing those conditions. He indicated that he had talked to a couple of City Councilmembers and they had not heard of any problems with his operation. I discussed the matter briefly with Chief Berthe who said he was not -aware of any problems last year and would be comfortable with similar operations for the upcoming season. I indicated to Mr. Baron that he could probably be on either the March 17, 1987, or April 7, 1987, agenda depending on the specific circumstances. I also told him we would contact him as to the date and whether or not he should be present. Given the fact that we have not addressed the ordinance amendment alluded to in your letter, I would suggest the processing of this request in the same manner as last year. Please let me know if you would like any additional information or if you would like to discuss the matter in more detail. (�il \� Fina a Director/City Clerk Attachment GV/af 47 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen REZONING PRELIMINARY PLAT STAFFORD PLACE B. Rezoning from A to R-1 and a Preliminary Plat Entitled Stafford Place Consisting of 192 Lots on 80 Acres --A public hearing was first held by the APC on October 28 to consider the rezoning from A to R-1 and a preliminary plat entitled Stafford Place which consisted of approximately 200 lots on 79.3 acres north of Diffley Road and east of the high school site. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates the area as R-2. There were a number of concerns raised at that meeting regarding the street alignment for the Stafford Place development, recognizing that a collector road would be necessary between Northview Road and Diffley Road to serve the high school and surrounding development. The Advisory Planning Commission continued the matter, directing the staff to work with the developer and school district to best site a road connection to serve the entire neighborhood. There was also a concern about the number of lots that did not meet the 85 foot width at the setback line. The developer was asked to correct that requirement to conform with the subdivision requirements. After a series of meetings with the school district, surrounding property owners and the development team representing the Chuck Hall and Enebek properties, a road alignment was worked out to satisfy the needs of the City, school district and adjacent developers. The developer of Stafford Place also redrew his preliminary plat and all lots now conform with the 85 foot width setback line and therefore conform with the R-1 requirements as set forth in the subdivision regulations. The APC decided to forward the Stafford Place rezoning and preliminary plat to the City Council without a specific approval or denial recommendation. Numerous changes have occurred to the proposed Stafford Place development since the original public hearing was held on October 28, 1986. Therefore, a new staff report has been prepared which includes planning and engineering recommendations, current drawings as prepared by the developer to reflect specific action to be considered by the City Council at this time. It is the judgment of this office that the original report would only confuse the reader, however, if any member of the City Council would like a copy of that report, feel free to contact this office and copies will be made for your review. The new staff report is enclosed on page(s)1:30-- /4�?. Also enclosed on pages � through /5 is a copy of a letter that was sent to the Independent School District 196 regarding common road alignment and design for Stafford Place/high school site as drafted by the Director of Public Works. /2V Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty For a copy of the APC action that was taken at the October 28 meeting and the February 24, 1987 meeting, refer to pages l�Z through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny: 1. the rezoning from A to R-1, 2. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from R-2 to R-1 and 3. a preliminary plat entitled Stafford Place as presented. !21 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - STAFFORD PLACE APPLICANT: DELTA DEVELOPMENT , LOCATION: SE1/4, SECTION 23 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: OCTOBER 26, 1986 CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: REVISED MARCH 12, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED: Two separate applications have been submitted requested a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Residential Single District) and a Preliminary Plat, Stafford Place, consisting of 79.18 acres and 180 single-family lots meeting all of the R-1 zoning standard requirements. The Comprehensive Guide designates this area as D-2 (0-6 dwelling units per acre), therefore, the Comprehensive Guide is consistent with this develop- ment request. CODE COMPLIANCE: As stated above, the Preliminary Plat will consist of 180 single-family lots. All lots meet or exceed the 86 ft. width at the 30 -ft. setback and all lots contain a minimum of 12,000 sq. ft. The proposed development has worked out an access arrangement with School District #196. Access to Stafford Place and the school district site will be a shared access directly north of Braddock Trail making a four-way intersection with Diffley Road. This development has proposed to purchase or trade property with the school district because of the alignment of the north/south access road to this development. It is the City's understanding that these agreements have been made and ownerships will fall into place with the filing of the final plat. The east/west collector street has also been reviewed and worked out between the Eagan Hill Farms developers, the school district and Stafford Place developers. Again, an additional outlot has been created in the northeastern portion of the plat which will have to be picked up by the Eagan Hill Farms development. The applicant is proposing to have a 66' wide right-of-way for the north/south collector street, 60' right-of-ways for interior looping streets and 50' right-of-ways for cul-de-sac streets. One suggestion is that the cul-de-sac radius be increased to 55' versus 50' as proposed to meet the City standards for radiuses at the end of cul-de-sacs. STAFFORD PLACE PAGE 2 If the preliminary plat is approved, it should be subject to the following conditions: 1. All lots shall meet the 85 ft., 12,000 sq. ft. criteria for an R-1 District. 2. The outlots be included in the adjacent plats when the property is developed. DCR/jj 13 Amended Report 3/12/87 STAFFORD PLACE GRADING/ DRAINAGE: The topography of this site is very hilly and has a signifi- cant change in elevation (+/- 1001) from the southwest corner to the northeast corner. The grading plan submitted proposes to limit the grading to only that which is necessary to install the internal streets and adjacent building sites. The internal streets grades do not appear to exceed the maximum 8% and the side slopes do not appear to exceed 3:1. The collector roads which abut this development on the north and west side shall be graded both horizontally and vertically to conform to 30 mph design speed for collector type roads. The connection of the north/south collector road with County Road No. 30 shall allow for the future upgrading of County Road No. 30 and its connection shall be coordinated with Dakota County Highway Department. The grading of the north/south collector road encroaches on the school property and will have to be reviewed and approved by the school district. The grading of Northview Park Road to the north also encroaches on property to the north and will have to be _reviewed and approved by its owners. Along the east line,' the only grading which encroaches outside this development is the stub street. The grading along the south line which abuts County Road No. 30 and one'unplatted parcel does not extend beyond this development. However, due to the existing steep slope on Lots 22-25, Block 1 and the future upgrading of Co. Rd. No. 30, it is questionable whether these lots are developable. A cross section of this area should be provided that would show the future upgrading of County Road No. 30 and the proposed development of these lots. No ponding is proposed or required on this site. Storm sewers will convey drainage from the south to the northeast corner of the site. All storm sewers Page 1. 2389e ��j?/ shall be designed in accordance with City of Eagan standards. Storm sewers in the north/south collector road shall be designed to convey drainage up to 200' west of the roadway. Storm sewer shall be extended easterly in the first east/west internal street paralleling County Road No. 30 to the cul-de-sac street. The low area abutting County Road 30 at the west end of this develop- ment is land -locked with no storm sewer outlet. Either extending storm sewer to this area shall be required or coordinating with Dakota County the redefining of the drainage along the south side of County Road 30, westerly across Braddock Trail. Based on the grading plan, the backyards of Lot 2 and 3, Block 3, may require extension of storm sewer unless additional grading is done to provide positive drainage to the street. The backyards of Lots 1-5, 16-21, Block 6, may also require extension of strom sewer unless additional grading is done to provide positive drainage to the street. The storm sewers from this development discharge into Pond JP -21 which is included in the Eagan Hills Farm development and presently does not have an outlet. A condition of the Eagan Hills Farm development is that the outlet for Pond JP -21 be provided which will also be a requirement of this develop - went. UTILITIES: A trunk water main exists in County Road No. 30 which is in the high pressure zone. Stafford Place for the most part is not included in the high pressure zone but in the intermediate pressure zone. Therefore, for a water main connection to occur at County Road No. 30 a pressure reducing sta- tion is required. Due to the development of the high school site and its an- ticipated water use, it is recommended this connection occur. A review of Stafford Place and the high school site is required to determine the best lo- cation for a pressure reducing station. It may be desirable to have a portion of Stafford Place and all of the high school building in the high pressure Page 2. 2389e /3-3 zone. A 16" trunk water main is required in Northview Park Road. A lateral water main shall be extended easterly in the easterly stub street to serve the property to the east. Water main shall also be extended in the north/south collector street and connect to the trunk main in Northview Park Road. There presently does not exist any sanitary sewer facilities available to service this proposed development. It will require the installation of a major lift station to be located east of Dodd Road and north of County Road No. 30 with the force main outlet to discharge into the existing trunk sani- tary sewer located at the intersection of Dodd and County Road No. 30. Sani- tary sewer lateral facilities are proposed within the development. Sanitary sewer shall be extended from the most southerly cul-de-sac to serve the un - platted parcel abutting County Road No. 30. The sanitary sewer in the north/ south collector street is required to serve only this development. The school site will be served by the existing sanitary sewer located at its northwest corner. The trunk sanitary sewer and water main collection/distribution system is necessary for the development of this site. Subsequently, it will be neces- sary to have the trunk facilities ordered.foc installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. STREETS/CIRCULATION: A comprehensive traffic generation and distribution study was performed for the overall Eagan Hills Farm P.U.D. concept which also included this development and the proposed high school site. The result of that study indicated Northview Park Road shall be constructed to a minimum 44' width which provides for a parking lane on each side of the roadway and a trailway on the south side. The study also recommended a minimum 36' width (one parking lane on residential side) for the north/south collector road Page 3. 2389e 154 abutting this development's west side which also abuts the high school sites east side. However, because this collector road will serve the high school site, the collector road will be widened to a 40' width from approximately the first residential street intersection south of County Road No. 30 to County Road '30. The additional width will provide for two southerly lanes approach- ing County Road No. 30 and one northerly lane. As a result, the on -street parking provided on the east side abutting this development shall be restric- ted during peak hours. In addition, the school district has been given the opportunity to request a parking lane along their side of the roadway depen- dent on their proposed layout. A trailway is also required on the west side of the north/south collector road. Northview Park Road and the north/south collector road will have to be constructed to a 9 ton design thickness. Due to the requirement of this development to be serviced by these collec- tor roads, they must be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate an 80' right-of-way for Northview Park Road and the north/south collector road. The required right-of-way for County Road No. 30 shall be dedicated in accord- ance with Dakota County. In addition, the appropriate slope easements required for the future upgrading of County Road No. 30 shall be provided for those lots which back onto County Road No. 30. The installation of the sanitary sewer lift station and force main outlet on the east side of Dodd Road will require the acquisition of easements out- side the limits of this development and the overall Eagan Hills Farm Develop- ment. Therefore, this development similar to the Eagan Hills Farm Development shall share in the cost of the acquisition of these easements as required. This development shall also be responsible for those easements included in the Page 4. 2389e /35 Eagan Hills Farm development for trunk sanitary sewer and storm sewer neces- sary for this development to proceed in the event the Eagan Hills Farm devel- opment does not proceed. This development shall acquire all regulatory agency permits within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. ASSESSMENTS: The assessment records indicate the original parcel, which is to be platted as Stafford Place, had the following trunk area and lateral benefit assessments levied against it. Project # Description 365 Water Area on S. 1/2 of Parcel 365 Water Lateral Benefit Postponed Per Agreement 2389e Page 5. 13� Usage Single -Family STAFFORD PLACE OCTOBER 28, 1986 PAGE 4 As a condition of final platting, the City will require this development to be responsible for the following assessments: TOTALASSESSMENTS ............................................... $283,938 These assessments will be the responsibility of this development at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. CONDITIONS: STAFFORD PLACE 1. Council shall authorize the installation of trunk watermain, trunk storm sewer and sanitary sewer facilities, the north/ south collector road prior to final plat approval. 2. This development shall dedicate the necessary .half right-of- way for Diffley Road as required by the County. 3. This development shall provide all easements and right-of-way necessary for Northview Park Road and the north/south collec- tor road, ponding and utility easements necessary to provide sanitary sewer and storm sewer service to this development. 4. A 30' pedestrian right-of-way shall be dedicated to the high school and Northview Park site in the northwest corner of this development. 5. This development shall assume all assessment obligations associated with upgrading Diffley Road, the north south collector road and trunk area utilities. 6. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with the current City engineering standards and requirements. 7. All standard plat conditions shall apply. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for a trail along the west side of the north south through street. /3, 1986 Est'd Description Zoning Rate Qty. Amount Sanitary Sewer Trunk R-1 $1240/.Ac. SOAc.x.B = $ 79,360 Storm Sewer Trunk R-1 .05/SF 2,787,840/SF = 139,392 Water Area R-1 1190/Ac. 40Ac.x.8 = 38,080 Water Lateral Benefit R-1 11.88/FF (1035x..05) = 6,148 Streets, Diffley Rd. R-1 (33.75/FF + 41) 1035/FF = 8,735 Sidewalk, Diffley Rd. R-1 11.81/FF 1035/FF = 12,223 TOTALASSESSMENTS ............................................... $283,938 These assessments will be the responsibility of this development at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. CONDITIONS: STAFFORD PLACE 1. Council shall authorize the installation of trunk watermain, trunk storm sewer and sanitary sewer facilities, the north/ south collector road prior to final plat approval. 2. This development shall dedicate the necessary .half right-of- way for Diffley Road as required by the County. 3. This development shall provide all easements and right-of-way necessary for Northview Park Road and the north/south collec- tor road, ponding and utility easements necessary to provide sanitary sewer and storm sewer service to this development. 4. A 30' pedestrian right-of-way shall be dedicated to the high school and Northview Park site in the northwest corner of this development. 5. This development shall assume all assessment obligations associated with upgrading Diffley Road, the north south collector road and trunk area utilities. 6. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with the current City engineering standards and requirements. 7. All standard plat conditions shall apply. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for a trail along the west side of the north south through street. /3, CONDITIONS: In addition to those included in the October 20, 1986, staff report: 9. The development of Lots 22-25, Block 1, is questionable due to the future upgrading of County Road No. 30/ The road loop in the southeast corner of the development may, dependent upon County Road No. 30, have to more northerly. 10. The land locked low area in the southwest corner of this development, ajacent to Diffley Road, shall have an outlet constructed. 11. The backyards of Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, and Lots 1-5, 16-21, Block 6, shall have storm sewer extended to them or additional grading done to provide positive drainage to the street. 12. The construction of the outlet for Pond JP -21 shall be a requirement of this development. 13. the location of the required number of watermain pressure reducing stations shall be coordinated with City staff. 14. A lateral watermain shall be extended easterly in the easterly stub street to the west property line of this development. 15. Watermain in the north/south collector street shall connect to the trunk main in the Northview Park Road. 16. Sanitary sewer service shall be extended to serve the unplat- ted parcel abutting County Road No. 30. 17. All street widths (F -F) and right-of-way widths shall be as set forth in the body of this review. 18. This development shall perform erosion/sediment control mea- sures in accordance with the City of Eagan's Erosion Control Manual and recommendations made by Dakota County Sail and Water Conservation District. See the attached Exhibit A. /3� DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT MINNESOTA I q06 �k SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS March 12, 1987 TO: Mike Foertsch City of Eagan FROM: Barb McCarthy Dakota County SWCD RE: Review of Preliminary Plat for Stafford Place. Farmington Professional Building 821 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: (612) 463-8626 We would like to submit the following comments for our review of the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan for Stafford Place dated March 3, 1987. INVENTORY OF SOIL RESOURCES Generally the soils on site are coarse textured (sandy loams and sands). Some areas contain significant amounts of gravel. There are significant portions of the site that contain wet soils, and their approximate limits are identified on the enclosed plan. The seasonal high water table is 2 ft. above to 1 ft. below the existing surface. The soil survey identifies that both perched and regional water table conditions occur on this site. We recommend a minimum 2 ft. separation distance between the seasonal high water table and basement floor elevations. Several lots within the area of wet soils are not proposed to be filled. In those wet areas where a building is proposed, all unsuitable soils should be excavated before placing fill. All fills must be properly compacted. INVENTORY OF WATER RESOURCES No wetlands or lakes occur on this site. The site is proposed to drain into JP -21, a 0.3 acre Type II wetland dominated by grasses. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER o /3� A major channel runs through the proposed site. This channel drains approximately 78-75 acres, including an area south of Diffley Road. Where will this runoff be routed to? We recommend that the City's engineering staff address this issue. What is the proposed schedule for installing the storm sewer trunk along Northview Road in relation to the schedule for Stafford Place? The storm sewer trunk along Northview Road must be operational before the Stafford Place stormsewer system is functional. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN REVIEW An incomplete erosion and sediment control (E & SC) plan was submitted with this plat. The "General Criteria" and "Checklist" should be used as a guide to develop this plan (see enclosure). An E & SC plan is composed of both a site map and narrative. The following are some specific items we would like to see incorporated into the E & SC plan: 1. We recommend that lots be "benched," as identified on the enclosed lot benching detail sheet. Lot drainage should be directed back "into the hill" rather than down the hill from lot to lot. Further, lot drainage should then be directed towards the street rather than down the backside of lots. This detail should be included in the E & SC plan. 2. Specifications for seeding and mulching the site should also be included in the plan, as identified on the "checklist." We recommend that all disturbed areas outside the boulevard be seeded and mulched within 48 hours after rough grading. 3. The site map should also identify ingress and egress points for the site. A gravel construction entrance pad will be necessary at ingress and egress points to minimize tracking of mud by vehicles onto Diffley Road. 4. The proposed catch basin filter ha -s caused flooding problems on other construction sites. We currently recommend that the Block and Gravel Curb Inlet Sediment Filter be used (see enclosure) since it does provide an overflow outlet. 5. Drainage from Block 4, lots 19-40 is proposed to be directed between .lots 7 & 8. Is an inlet proposed on lot 39 at the storm manhole to handle these flows. City engineering staff should address this issue. ME 6. It may also be necessary to place Temporary Right - of -way -Diversions along Northview Road (see enclosure). 7. Silt curtains should be properly installed before any grading begins. This should be identified on the E & SC plan. 8. The re -vegetation of all areas disturbed by utility construction must be addressed in the E & SC plan. 9. The company responsible for maintaining and removing all erosion control practices should be identified in the E & SC plan. We recommend that a statement be placed on the development plan that the home builders will be responsible for E & SC during home construction. At this time, we cannot approve the Erosion Control Plan submitted for this project. We understand that with any new program, it takes time to educate those involved in developing adequate Erosion and Sediment Control Plans. We hope that acceptable Erosion and Sediment Control Plans are submitted with future Preliminary Plats. We recommend that the Preliminary Plat be approved but that an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan be submitted and approved by SWCD staff before a grading permit is issued. cc: Delta Development Corp. Hedlund Engineering Services, Inc. r4v ��-� ](! per 1 882.0 I _ 86.1 �N �r�e�• 192. t Li• JP-59� '8583 � l A JP -451' �Z �� 887a 864.0 �r-�eEtg9'4.Ot6r- 887.1 �-+.�-r�'879.T 1N P-6 >z. 897..i N 2 `" 193.0 ;'�� 888.1 '.� i. _ J8 6� 1 195.5 „ JP -46 892.3 �' 887.0 L.S. i i' 4B 3.3 P-41 I �•• --II�[Cr.0 � 1_- . � R. 885.3---a JP -63 J 887.0 a` _- 899.T:.�1 JP -32 I 900.7;du�� 885.7 s JP -31 JP -39: �:..._ 888.1$ 876.3 l�_ + J890.7 Oji -_ 880.4 I I + 895.0 9E890 T RS'A0, / ! SSL 2I I I �r ITTI 16- `J, X31 873D 879.4 JF E iI 8, W IJ. -W 23- RN ?1 s4' JP -34 ��yJ-s 884.0 it I JP -29 1 945.0 O. 58.01 O , s GP -7 JP -18p 8'.64.0 87 00 y \K -Z Ise ADC \ IL GP -4 F-= 883. 887.4 � JP -55 ` // J JP- 54 ;/- //JP -23 852.2 52 4 ` F I IN JP -2 843. J � 849. JP -25 817.0 824.0 j �7-- i x V Z4 30 1AL! UDITOR'S SLI No. 13 1 JP -68 862.0 878.0 1J -bb -� 1 I 0, A SIL PARK ��_5i11yyf, 1�i : s SUBJECT PARCEL ................ . FIG. *1 city of eagan STORM SEWER approved. standard IDPUBLIC 3 EPARTMEN DMASTtR PLAN . EPAR - C 0 1V 7 C-jjv1 ., t I12 it (jit)a ftft �m X 12! r-' W c-, W 0 C- BB QED I 26 3d ..MOONS % P 12!" WES7 P '31-ISViNk, A. F 24' l?-"/ C- i V 12!� t(58 7f15 �18"AUOMR'S MO. NO. 4' 59 C -LL -CC 182 E-4 7 77 1 ............... SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. #2 city of eagan approved:- plate standard SANITARY SEWER #: 1PPUBLIC WORKSPLAN DEPARTMENT MASTE c� n / _ 1 III 50.3/67.0uV1 - ' IwES OTFFR )AD,/ 112 50.4/67.0 16' r D 4(D54.6/71.0 54.6/71.0 �16' x 118 53.1/68.0 .2j 50.3/670 Id179 I6' �' '�_aarrra -� i� � ■_ � w � -23 _. . �' 78 51.4/65.0 N 18.4/29.0 �vD 6 ht 0. GROUNO STORAGE I I 5000 GM BOOSTER 183 H.W.L 1059 • �•:�:��.�.�.:•;• 183 O182 ■ 68.0/ 24 i' .,_^.;.;; 12" (&68'.7/74.0 i 185 1 TO Ii' 74.4/82.0 ` 1— F. "1 rx 20' zl; W z (�• W Q a ® 70.8 / 76.�, 45.6/58.0 - 201 --26-- 203 '• 1020 ' —26- — 203 43,3/58.0 �Q-2Q2 I city of eagan PUBLIC $ WORKS DEPARTME ILI WES" PLBLISI!iN vp a L } Ist ADD n J4 38.4/56.0 i 12' 77�117 53.7/.r.0 c3� 1b 000 ` 1224 116 66.7/ 85.0 1 — 4 --- i 186 Iy��4 1020 187139.0/g4. _— 85.2/95,0 188 16' 1 - iAUD S-UBM NO. 42 84.5/95.0_., LOD _ 189 12■ wwrwww�� � 0 IITE�N' ` I6' j 1 1020 - 25_ !; 47.6/63.0 88 4/9%iiz, 197 . 195 'r ���\ . irz.�1 74.6/ zo 1. R SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. #3 approved • standard plate #: WATER IVIASTER'PLAN N. E. ADDITIONAL WATER AREA 40 AC, I &M -GE E JA C.E W I t RE 1/: mom 'rim 1�L[tl 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 February 25, 1987 BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VAC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES DR JOHN HANSON City Administrator ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT - SECONDARY EDUCATION EUGENE VANOVERBEKE City Clerk INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #196 14445 DIAMOND PATH RD ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 Re: Stafford Place/High School Site - Common Road Alignment & Design Dear John: On Friday, February 20, a joint meeting was held with the City of Eagan, representatives of the school district and the developer of the Stafford Place residential development adjacent to the east boundary of the proposed high school site. The purpose of the meeting was to review the proposed alignment, location and configuration of the north/south collector street between Diffley Road and Northv iew Park Road along your common boundary. As a result of that meeting, it was mutually agreed that an acceptable curvilinear alignment could be designed with its major access onto Diffley Road opposite Braddock Trail and its access onto Northview Park Road approximately 150' east of your northeast corner. The Stafford Place development has redesigned its internal alignment and will be providing several single family residential lots that will take direct driveway access from this north/south collector road. Because of the collector status of this road, the minimum width required by the City of Eagan is 36' from face of curb to face of curb (F -F). This will provide for a 14' wide travel lane in each direction plus an 8' parking lane along the east side providing service for the single-family properties. The City does not intend to install an 8' parking lane (resulting in a 44' F -F) along the school side of this north/south collector unless requested in writing to do so. However, in order to accommodate proper left -turn lanes for egress traffic at Diffley Road and for ingress traffic at the most southerly parking lot entrance, the north/south road will be increased to a 40' F -F from Diffley Road to the southerly parking lot entrance which will be opposite the residential street intersection for Stafford Place, approximately 725' north of Diffley Road. This 40' section will provide for two lanes in one direction (2 each @ 13' = 26') and one lane in the opposite direction (14'). THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY DR JOHN HANSON FEBRUARY 24, 1987 PAGE 2 For comparative purposes, Apple Valley High School is serviced by Hayes Avenue which is a 44' F -F roadway which provides for a 14' lane in each direction with+7Wn 8' parking lanes. It is my understanding that there are currently problems being experienced with southbound traffic trying to bypass school traffic(waiting to turn left from Hayes into the high school parking lot)through this 22' half roadway section. On Eagan's proposal, this road section would be increased to 26' which 'would widen the 8' parking lane into a full bypass traffic lane. In order to accommodate these traffic lane modifications, the City of Eagan would restrict on -street parking for the single- family development from Diffley Road through the first two entrances into the high school parking lot. These parking restrictions would be in effect during the appropriate A.M. and P.M. peak hours based on school district input. The City will require an 8' bituminous off-street trailway to be constructed along the general alignment of this north/south collector road. Presently, it is our intention to have this trailway constructed on the school side of this collector street. In order to provide a minimum 8' grass boulevard area between the edge of pathway and the face of curb, it will be necessary to construct this trailway on school property or require a 36' half right-of-way dedication in lieu of the proposed 30' half right- of-way dedication. Please let me know if additional information or clarification is necessary or if I have incorrectly stated the understandings reached at the joint meeting referenced previously. I appreciate the cooperative effort you have shown in the past and would like to continue to be involved in the development process to .ensure that the final design is compatible to all parties concerned. Sincerely, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Mark Parranto, Developer (Stafford Place) Ted Rozeboom, Hammel, Greene & Abrahamson Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Mark Hanson, Consulting Design Engineer Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer APC Minutes October 28, 1986 Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the entire parcel as R-1 Single Family, and denial of the request for NB zoning, based upon the following: 1. That too much commercial zoning presently exists in the City of Eagan. 2. That this is not the appropriate location for commercial use, surrounded by single family property, and lacking access to adequate streets. 3. That the proposal does not comply with the Comprehensive Guide Plan or Zoning Plan. 4. 'That the County has not received the proposal as to the office. All voted aye. Harrison then moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions proposed by staff and that the entire parcel be zoned and developed as R-1. Public Works Director Colbert questioned whether the Planning Commission would want to see the revised plat, A with the NB removed, and have the opportunity for staff to review the proposed road configuration. Members Harrison and Wilkins then withdrew their motion and second. Harrison then moved and Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the preliminary plat application to -the next Planning Commission meeting, advising that the developer have a meeting with the neighbors and that the necessarily revised preliminary plat be forwarded to the staff in time to allow review prior to the next Planning Commission meeting. All voted in favor except Trygg and Hall. STAFFORD PLACE - PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING The Commission discussed whether this matter should be 'taken off the agenda. It appeared that several of the Planning Commission members had been advised that the item was to be continued, based upon the applicant's representations on Monday, prior to the meeting. While the applicant had apparently withdrawn the request for continuance, the Commission was concerned with the fact that several members had not reviewed the proposal, and that staff had some concerns with reduced lot widths for 114 of the 200 lots. However, the Commission did determine to allow a short presentation by the developer in light of the fact that several neighbors were present and such discussion might promote a smoother transition at the next Planning Commission �w meeting. The applicant did make a short presentation in regard to the steep slopes resulting in the road configuration that did exist. . It was also 14V 6 miles of this area being zoned or proposed to be zoned commercial. Mr. Wayne ..•= Tower of Molinaro & Associates suggested SS that a neighborhood store where the S kids could walk for milk and bread would be appropriate, and that significant commercial development was not occurring in this particular area. He also suggested that good landscaping would make the proposal less obtrusive. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the entire parcel as R-1 Single Family, and denial of the request for NB zoning, based upon the following: 1. That too much commercial zoning presently exists in the City of Eagan. 2. That this is not the appropriate location for commercial use, surrounded by single family property, and lacking access to adequate streets. 3. That the proposal does not comply with the Comprehensive Guide Plan or Zoning Plan. 4. 'That the County has not received the proposal as to the office. All voted aye. Harrison then moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions proposed by staff and that the entire parcel be zoned and developed as R-1. Public Works Director Colbert questioned whether the Planning Commission would want to see the revised plat, A with the NB removed, and have the opportunity for staff to review the proposed road configuration. Members Harrison and Wilkins then withdrew their motion and second. Harrison then moved and Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the preliminary plat application to -the next Planning Commission meeting, advising that the developer have a meeting with the neighbors and that the necessarily revised preliminary plat be forwarded to the staff in time to allow review prior to the next Planning Commission meeting. All voted in favor except Trygg and Hall. STAFFORD PLACE - PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING The Commission discussed whether this matter should be 'taken off the agenda. It appeared that several of the Planning Commission members had been advised that the item was to be continued, based upon the applicant's representations on Monday, prior to the meeting. While the applicant had apparently withdrawn the request for continuance, the Commission was concerned with the fact that several members had not reviewed the proposal, and that staff had some concerns with reduced lot widths for 114 of the 200 lots. However, the Commission did determine to allow a short presentation by the developer in light of the fact that several neighbors were present and such discussion might promote a smoother transition at the next Planning Commission �w meeting. The applicant did make a short presentation in regard to the steep slopes resulting in the road configuration that did exist. . It was also 14V 6 Q APC Minutes October 28, 1986 pointed out that all of the lots met or exceeded the 12,000 square foot requirement, although 114 lots were less than the 85 foot width._ Two neighbors were present with miscellaneous questions, as was.JoAnn Ellison from School District #196. Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend continuing the application to the next Planning Commission meeting, subject to further study and review by the County Highway Department. Several members also expressed concern that they may not be able to recommend approval of a plat that contained 114 of 200 lots with less than standard widths. Discussion also centered around the need for a collector street in this area in light of a larger development to the north. All voted in favor except member Hall, who abstained. DECEMBER PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Because of the proximity to the Christmas holiday, Chairperson McCrea recommended that the December Planning Commission meeting be held on December 18, 1986. All members approved. NORTHWEST RACQUET & SWIM CLUB Chairperson McCrea advised the Commission that the Northwest Racquet & Swim Club, which had an interest in locating in the City of Eagan, had proposed to provide a tour of its facility to the Planning Commission members. Only two of the members expressed a.desire for such a tour. ADJOURNMENT Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 p.m. All voted yes. RICHARD HEFTI Mr. Colbert, Director of Public Works, then advised the Planning Commission that Assistant City Engineer Rich Hefti, was attending his last Planning Commission meeting, due to the fact that he had taken a position with the City of Rosemount. Mr. Colbert, as well as the Planning Commission members, wished Mr. Heft•i the best in his future endeavors. /d3 7- Secretary - APC DGK APC Minutes February 24, 1987 STAFFORD PLACE - DELTA DEVELOPMENT REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Harrison then convened the first public hearing of the evening in regard to the request of Delta Development for rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family), and a preliminary plat consisting of 192 lots on 80 acres located in the southeast quarter of Section 23, abutting County Road #30 on the south, east of Northview Elementary School. Not having a report available, the presentation was not made by staff. However, Mr. Mark Parranto was present to represent the developer. Mr. Parranto advised the Planning Commission that all the necessary issues were not resolved until Friday night, February 20, 1987 involving surrounding developers, City of Eagan, Dakota County and Independent School District #196. He indicated that the road alignment was now in place and that all lots met standard R-1 requirements. He advised that the plat had been through 8 changes pursuant to City requests. It was indicated that Northview Road now cross the northeasterly portion of the property with the result that a land swap was being initiated between the Stafford Place development and the developer to the north. Mr. Parranto described the collector street being proposed as being the only one between Lexington Avenue and Dodd Road, which would be 40 feet wide from Diffley, north to the first intersection with a residential street and then being 36 feet wide from that point north. It was indicated that the only issue that had not been resolved was the location of utilities. There being no one present from the public, the public hearing was closed. Discussion centered around the fact that now all lots met R-1 requirements. Member McCrea suggested that the two concerns raised at the prior hearings before the Commission had been resolved in regard to undersized lots and final location of streets to accommodate future development. Mr. Parranto assured that all but two of the lots met R-l.requirements and those two could be and would be adjusted. It was indicated that there was a cul-de- sac that exceeded the 500 foot center line to end of cul-de-sac restriction. The proposed cul-de-sac was 50 feet from centerline to center of .the bubble. Mr. Colbert indicated that there had been no opportunity to review the grading and drainage plan with the new alignments. Discussion centered around the ability to provide satisfactory information to staff prior to the future Planning Commission meeting or the next council meeting. Mr. Parranto requested that the Planning Commission pass the proposal to the Council without recommendation, if it could not approve. Discussion centered around the time constraints in regard to obtaining a grading permit by April 15, which Mr. Colbert suggested would still be possible after continuance of the preliminary plat. McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to rezoning and preliminary plat to the City Council provided by the developer to City staff were adequate 2 recommend approval of the if the information to be to allow the staff to APC Minutes February 24, 1987 make a positive recommendation. If any serious concerns were raised by the staff, the matter would have to be returned to the Planning Commission. After discussion, the motion died for a lack of majority with three voting in favor and 4 against. Chairman Hall made a motion to postpone the matter for 30 days, which motion died for lack of a second. Voracek moved to forward the matter to the City Council without recommendation for its March 17, 1987 meeting, due to lack of information. Harrison seconded the motion. Harrison, Voracek, Gustafson, and Krisnik voted yes; Trygg, McCrea and Wilkins voted nay. The motion was carried. BBD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The second public hearing of the evening convened by Chairman Harrison was upon the applications of Mr. William Henning for a preliminary plat and conditional use permit for a Neighborhood Convenience Center with gas pumps on 4.3 acres in part of the southeast quarter of Section 9 on the northeast corner of Yankee Doodle and Coachman Roads. Mr. Runkle introduced the project indicating that it had been continued due to problems of circulation around the proposed gas pumps. The new plan provided access to Yankee Doodle Road and deleted parking, both of which would facilitate the new circulation plan. It was also pointed out that the plan was back to the original proposal of one lot for development with one outlot for future development. Mr. Steven Krouse, an architect, was present to represent the developer. Member Krisnik expressed concern regarding the ability to require the owner or lessee to discontinue use of gas pumps if the service bays are not in operation. McCrea questioned whether the proposed sign location was in violation of the 300 foot requirement within the Ordinance, which Mr. Runkle stated applied to signs on the same side of the street, while in this case, the signs are separated by Coachman Road. Chairman McCrea also expressed concern in regard to the service bays and the problem of obligating the responsible parties to continue their operation. Mr. Krouse indicated that the owner of the entire lot was willing to guaranty the operation of the service bays in conjunction with the gas pumps by written agreement with the City. Voracek moved, McCrea seconded the motion• to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the foilou:ing conditions: i. Ali Frprdar_d platti.n6 conditions shall be adhered to. 2. No additional signage shall be `allowed on the gas pump canopy. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be included on a grading plan with the final plat submission. A financial guarantee will be required and not released until after one year from the date of installation. 4. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 16�6 3 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One ORDINANCE FOR ACCESSORY HOUSING C. Ordinance for Accessory Housing --At the January 6 City Council meeting, an ordinance regulating accessory apartments in R-1 residential districts was first given consideration. There were a number of changes and revisions made to the draft ordinance, all of which were included in a new ordinance draft prepared by the City Attorney's office and considered at the January 20 City Council meeting. At the meeting, a recommendation was made by the City Council to send the zoning amendment allowing for accessory apartments in R-1 residential districts to the Advisory Planning Commission for purposes of holding a public hearing. A public hearing was held by the APC at their February 24, 1987 meeting. There were no persons in the audience expressing support or objection to the proposed regulatory action to include accessory housing in R-1 residential districts. The APC is recommending approval of the ordinance amendment. For City Council review, a copy of the final accessory apartments ordinance amendment draft is enclosed on pages through 160 —T ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an ordinance amendment to Chapter 11 relative to "accessory apartments/housing in R-1 residential districts." Draft 1-7-87 ORDINANCE NO. • , 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE, CHAPTER 11, ENTITLED "LAND USE REGULATIONS" BY ADDING PROVISIONS RELATING TO ACCESSORY APARTMENTS IN R-1 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE SECTION 11.99, WHICH CONTAINS PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Eagan City Code, Chapter 11, is hereby amended by adding Section 11.20, Subd. 5.C.7 to read as follows: Section 11.20, Subd 5.C.7. Applications for conversion of existing, owner occupied, detached single family homes to two-family use may be allowed by the creation of an accessory apartment subject to review by the city. (a) Application shall be made on forms provided by the City which shall include the following: i. Legal description of the property location and proof of ownership. ii. Scale plans indicating existing and proposed floor plans and access to both the principal unit and the accessory unit. iii. Site plan depicting parking availability. (b) The City Planner shall review the completed application in consultation with the Building Inspector and Fire Chief, and shall determine whether the proposed conversion meets the following standards: i. The accessory apartment shall be clearly a subordinate part of the single-family dwelling and in no case shall it be more than Forty (40%) percent of the building's total floor area. ii. The accessory apartment shall consist of at least twenty (20%) percent of the principal building's total floor area. Living space square footage for the accessory apartment shall include a kitchen or cooking facilities, a bathroom and a living room. iii. No front entrances shall be added to the house as a result of the accessory apartment permit. iv. The house shall be owner -occupied. total v. A minimum /of three off-street parking spaces shall be provided. vi. The accessory apartment and principal unit shall meet the applicable standards and requirements of the Eagan City Code, Building Code and Fire Code. vii. The building and property shall remain in single ownership and title and shall have only one mailing address. viii. Only one accessory apartment permit may be issued for -.-. each detached single family home. (c) The City Planner shall deny or approve the application based upon a statement of findings relative to the above standards. If the decision is to accept, a notice of intent shall be sent to all neighboring owners within 150 feet of the perimeter of the property. Written comments will be requested within 10 days, reviewed, and a ins j: Z final decision made by the City Planner. The applicant or other aggrieved party may appeal the decision within 10 days to the City Council which shall make the final determination. Failure to give mailed notice or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings provided a bona fide attempt has been made to contact the neighboring owners. (d) The City has the right to attach conditions when approving an accessory apartment permit. The City shall require the owner to place restrictive covenants to be recorded with the property controlling the accessory apartment. Such covenants shall be approved by the City Attorney. (e) Upon the sale of a home having an accessory apartment permit, the buyer shall submit a new application for renewal of the permit. (f) An accessory apartment permit shall terminate if the above referenced standards are not adhered to. (g) The City Councicl may revoke an accessory apartment permit r,h if the criteria and conditions under which the permit was granted are violated. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 11.99 entitled "Violation A Misdemeanor" is hereby adopted in its entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein. t Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: A: :� .,,. � ak- 000ar e Its Clerk Date Ordinance Adopted: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL Date Ordinance Published in the legal newspaper: Its Mayor Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two WAIVER OF PLAT/BRAA INCORPORATED D. Waiver of Plat for BRAA Incorporated in order to shift a property line on Lot 6, Block 2, Safari 3rd Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their February 24, 1987 meeting, to consider a waiver of plat application submitted by BRAA Incorporated to shift a property line between Lots 6 and 7 in the Safari 3rd Addition, 6.41 feet further to the east. The APC is recommending approval. For a copy of the staff report on this item, refer to pages through 7 63. There is no parkland dedication requirement to be satisfied on this waiver of plat. For a copy of the APC action, refer to page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat request. as submitted by BRAA Inc. SUBJ ECT : APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: CITY OF EAGAN WAIVER OF PLAT BRAA INC. LOTS 6 & 7, SAFARI 3RD ADDITION R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) FEBRUARY 24, 1987 FEBRUARY 13, 1987 PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the City's consulting engineering firm, requesting a waiver of plat in order.to shift the property line between Lots 6 and 7 in the Safari 3rd Addition 6.41 feet further to the east. This waiver is necessary since an existing storm sewer pipe is not within the easement and conflicts with a proposed house location. Once the new property line is created through the waiver process, the acquisition of a new 10 foot easement and vacation of the existing 10 foot easement can occur. Both lots will still meet all R-1 requirements. If approved, this waiver of plat shall be subject to all applicable ordinances. n /� v 41 A NN AJ O 4-4 jt� O d pCI 11 °� b s �. e� C w �1 3 b C A 4 p r� �4.)4J ro •.+ H y�. > 4 u • • v / \ \ \ Vl \ `a �1 rdIPNo ro \ � O s e der. a` V 3 c. 4 141 �Ni V x yp r7 Os Op. kb w k J r� 4 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 26, 1987 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Thursday, February 26, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Acting Chairman Harrison, Members Gustafson, Voracek, Trygg and Krisnik. Absent were Chairman Hall, Members Wilkins and McCrea. Also present were City Planner Dale Runkle, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch and Assistant City Attorney David Keller. AGENDA Acting Chairman Harrison dispensed with the roll. After advising the public and the applicants that all business conducted at this meeting would be before the Council on March 17, 1987, if recommended for approval or recommended for denial, Voracek moved, Trygg seconded the motion to approve the agenda as drafted. All voted yes. MINUTES As no"minutes were available from the meeting held two nights previous, no action was taken. BRAA, INC. - WAIVER OF PLAT Chairman Harrison convened the first public hearing of the evening in regard to the request of BRAA, Inc. to shift the southeast property.line on Lot 6, Block 2, Safari 3rd Addition, 5 feet.further to the east to correct a utility conflict with setback requirements in the southeast quarter of Section 32. Mr. Runkle described the, proposal, which was basically to allow the actual utilities constructed to lie within the lot line easements and allow for proper setbacks. Mr. Colbert confirmed that his department was in support of the proposed waiver. There being no one from the public to object, Voracek moved, Gustafson seconded the motion tcq recommend approval of the waiver of plat. All voted aye. LEHMANS IN EAGAN - CONDITIONAL USE -PERMIT Acting Chairman Harrison then convened the second public hearing of the evening in regard to the application of Don McTeague for a conditional use permit for a 20 foot tall pylon sign with a signage area of approximately 104 square feet. The proposed location was nearly 270 feet southeast of the /G G Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/LEHMANS GARAGE INCORPORATED E. Conditional Use Permit for Lehmans Garage Inc. for a 20 foot tall Pylon Sign Located on Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their February 26, 1987 meeting,,to consider a conditional use permit application as submitted by Lehmans in Eagan to allow the erection of a 20 foot tall pylon sign for their existing auto repair center located on Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park. The APC is recommending approval of the conditional use permit as presented. For additional information, refer to copy of the staff report enclosed on pages_ through. There is no parkland dedication required on this item. For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to page(s)�. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for Lehmans in Eagan as presented. 16'�D r, 1z CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: LEHMAN'S IN EAGAN (DON MC TEAGUE) LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 2, CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK SW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 26, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 18, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by Lehman's In Eagan, requesting a conditional use permit to erect a 20' tall pylon sign for their existing auto repair center. The signage area measures approximately 616" x 16' (104 S.F.) and will be interior lighted. The proposed location _is nearly 270' southeast of the Kennebec Drive and Seneca Road intersection. The widest portion of this sign must be 10' within the property line. There are no other pylon signs within 300 feet of this proposed location, even though the building that includes Lehmans has more than one tenant. If approved, this conditional use permit shall be subject to all applicable sign ordinances and the one time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. /GG i TO — �� IN EAGAN �: �, " — COliPLETE h1ECNANICAL ANDVyCOLLISION REPAIR , 1 i G o'd' 7J�ar IoI� �A° ti l%FIITe fi.l;,L Pk8 r � Imo/ fwo(ze•y,�-1.1t �r1� � pPlr� a.yE 1 I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 26, 1987 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Thursday, February 26, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Acting Chairman Harrison, Members Gustafson, Voracek, Trygg and Krisnik. Absent were Chairman Hall, Members Wilkins and McCrea. Also present were City Planner Dale Runkle, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch and Assistant City Attorney David Keller. AGENDA Acting Chairman Harrison dispensed with the roll. After advising the public and the applicants that all business conducted at this meeting.would be before the Council on March 17, 1987, if recommended for approval or recommended for denial, Voracek moved, Trygg seconded the motion to approve the agenda as drafted. All voted yes. MINUTES As no minutes were available from the meeting held two nights previous, no action was taken. BRAA, INC. — WAIVER OF PLAT Chairman Harrison convened the first public hearing of the evening in regard to the request of BRAA, Inc. to shift the southeast property -line on Lot 6, Block 2, Safari 3rd Addition, 5 feet further to the east to correct a utility conflict with setback requirements in the southeast quarter of Section 32. Mr. Runkle described the proposal, which was basically to allow the actual utilities constructed to lie within the lot line easements and allow for proper setbacks. Mr. Colbert confirmed that his department was in support of the proposed waiver. There being no one from the public to object, Voracek moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to, recommend approval of the waiver of plat. All voted aye. LEHMANS IN EAGAN — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Acting Chairman Harrison then convened the second public hearing of the evening in regard to the application of Don McTeague for a conditional use permit for a 20 foot tall pylon sign with a signage area of approximately 104 square feet. The proposed location was nearly 270 feet southeast of the /6� APC Minutes February 26, 1987 Kennebec and Seneca Roads intersection on Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park in the southwest quarter of Section 17. Mr. Runkle indicated that the proposed sign met all ordinance requirements. There was no one from the public, however, the owner was present to respond to questions. Staff indicated that there were no other tenants in the building. Mr. Voracek was advised that future signs could meet the 300 foot spacing requirement on adjacent lots. Krisnik moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a 20 foot tall pylon sign with a signage area of approximately 104 square feet, subject to all applicable sign ordinances and a one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. All voted in favor. BLACKHAWK PLAZA - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The application of Blackhawk Plaza, Inc., Steve Ramsey, for a conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in a NB (Neighborhood Business) district, and for the separation of gas pumps and service bays in Blackhawk Plaza in the southeast quarter of Section 20, was the subject of the third public hearing convened by Mr. Harrison. City Planner Runkle introduced the proposal which was a request from Tom Thumb, a major anchor tenant on the western most portion of Blackhawk Plaza Center, to have gas pumps with a canopy, while the service bays would be located in a separate facility on a separate lot, with a separate owner near the cemetery along County Road #30. Mr. Chuck Carmichael, attorney for the applicant, was present. There was no one from the public. Mr. Krisnik questioned the validity of the proposed buffer to residents to the west in the single family homes and the location of the gas pumps and canopies so close to Blackhawk Road. Mr. Voracek requested information regarding the location of R-1 residents relative to the proposed gas pumps and information as to any potential fire code violations. Mr. Runkle indicated that State Fire Marshall and City Fire Chief approval would be required. The applicant was reminded that under City Ordinance, service bays would have to be operational in order for gas pumps to be allowed. Mr. Carmichael pointed out that the shopping center itself was due to open very soon and that the car service center which would have the bays, is not yet being constructed. There was discussion regarding the berm between the Center and Blackhawk Road, which apparently could not exceed 3 feet in height, if even that high. It was indicated that the Tom Thumb lease was contingent upon obtaining gas pumps. Mr. Krisnik indicated concern in regard to the shielding of lighting from'the gas pump canopy. Trygg moved to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and Chairman Hall seconded the motion in order to put the matter on the floor before the Commission. Trygg and Harrison voted yea;. Gustafson and Krisnik voted nay; and Voracek abstained based on his belief that Tom Thumb was a client of his employer. Krisnik then moved to recommend denial of the conditional use permit, based upon: 0 2 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GAS PUMPS FOR BLACBHAWR PLAZA F. Conditional Use Permit (Blackhawk Plaza, Inc.) to Allow Gas Pumps and Service Bays on Separate Lots at the Blackhawk Plaza --A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting held on February 26, 1987, to consider an application submitted by the owner of the Blackhawk Plaza facility requesting a conditiona use permit to allow gas pumps in an NB district and for the separation of pumps and service bays. The APC is recommending denial of this conditional use permit application. For additional information regarding the conditional use permit application, refer to the staff report enclosed on pages__ through. There is no parkland dedication required on this item. For a co of the APC action, refer to those minutes found on page (s) J�. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit to allow gas pumps and service bays on separate lots for the Blackhawk Plaza neighborhood shopping center. //0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: BLACKHAWS PLAZA INC., STEVE RAMSEY LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 20 EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 26, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT " APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the owner of the Blackhawk Plaza facility, requesting a conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in a N.B. (neighborhood business) district and for the separation of pumps and service bays. Tom Thumb will be the tenant located on the westernmost portion of Blackhawk Plaza along Blackhawk Road. This application does not include service bays, however, Lot 5 of this plat did receive a conditional use permit approval for a full service gas station as per Code requirements at the time of preliminary plat approval. Code does not allow the opening of such a facility until at least 10,000 square feet of retail space has had occupancy. In addition, the owner intends to provide auto related service facilities on Lot 7 near the cemetary along County Road 30. The City's Engineering Department has reviewed this plan and all auto turning radius' meet requirements. All setbacks meet Code requirements and only 3 parking stalls will be removed. If approved, this conditional use permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The canopy will not be used for additional signage. 2. The storage tanks shall be located entirely under the drive area so if they are replaced or repaired, the landscaping along Blackhawk Road will not be disturbed. 3. The canopy shall be no closer than 50 feet to the Blackhawk Road right-of-way. 4. All other applicable Code requirements shall be adhered to. 171 VKOYUSEP r!W-O .-5U'-C, •(e REMPORLEV LdNLRLTE SLPIM' OVER TANKS NOTE! UNVErGKDUNV TANKS HAVE 2'-C SErrkRNTIDN AND 3'.O WRY DEPTIA /p- , E to Fn cm C%Q W Z Z Z CM LLI Ljj bl, W cc C12-0 0 u APC Minutes February 26, 1987 Kennebec and Seneca Roads intersection on Lot 6, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park in the southwest quarter of Section 17. Mr. Runkle indicated that the proposed sign met all ordinance requirements. There was no one from the public, however, the owner was present to respond to questions. Staff indicated that there were no other tenants in the building. Mr. Voracek was advised that future signs could meet the 300 foot spacing requirement on adjacent lots. Krisnik moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a 20 foot tall pylon sign with a signage area of approximately 104 square feet, subject to all applicable sign ordinances and a one—time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. All voted in favor. BLACKHAWK PLAZA — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The application of Blackhawk Plaza, Inc., Steve Ramsey, for a conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in a NB (Neighborhood Business) district, and for the separation of gas pumps and service bays in Blackhawk Plaza in the southeast quarter of Section 20, was the subject of the third public hearing convened by Mr. Harrison. City Planner Runkle introduced the proposal which was a request from Tom Thumb, a major anchor tenant on the western most portion of Blackhawk Plaza Center, to have gas pumps with a canopy, while the service bays would be located in a separate facility on a separate lot, with a separate owner near the cemetery along County Road #30. Mr. Chuck Carmichael, attorney for the applicant, was present. There was no one from the public. Mr. Krisnik questioned the validity of the proposed buffer to residents to the west in the single family homes and the location of the gas pumps and canopies so close to Blackhawk Road. Mr. Voracek requested information regarding the location of R-1 residents relative to the proposed gas pumps and information as to any potential fire code violations. Mr. Runkle indicated that State Fire Marshall and City Fire Chief approval would be required. The applicant was reminded that under City Ordinance, service bays would have to be operational in order for gas pumps to be allowed. Mr. Carmichael pointed out that the shopping center itself was due to open very soon and that the car service center which would have the bays, is not yet being constructed. There was discussion regarding the berm between the Center and Blackhawk Road, which apparently could not exceed 3 feet in height, if even that high. It was indicated that the Tom Thumb lease was contingent upon obtaining gas pumps. Mr. Krisnik indicated concern in regard to the shielding of lighting from the gas pump canopy. _ Trygg moved to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and Chairman Hall seconded the motion in order to put the matter on the floor before the Commission. Trygg and Harrison voted yea;- Gustafson and Krisnik voted nay; and Voracek abstained based on his belief that Tom Thumb was a client of his employer. Krisnik then moved to recommend denial of the conditional use permit, based upon: � 7LI 2 APC Minutes February 26, 1987 1. The fact that the pumps would be provided without a direct tie to service bays as required under the ordinance. 2. That the service bays would be located too close to the cemetery area. 3. That the gas pumps and lighting were too close to the residential areas. Harrison seconded the motion to put the matter on the floor. Gustafson, Krisnik and Harrison voted yea; Trygg voted nay; and Voracek abstained. The motion passed. JAMES UNKER - WAIVER OF PLAT Chairman Harrison then called the public hearing in regard to the request for waiver of plat by James Unker for lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition, in the southeast quarter of Section 29. Mr. Runkle introduced the application. Mr. Unker was present and requested that the matter be tabled to allow him to review the conditions proposed by City staff in regard to the request of lot split. There was significant discussion in regard to the large number of easements required to service the property. There was no one from the public to respond. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to continue the matter to the regular March APC meeting. All voted yes. DANBURY ADDITION - REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT & VARIANCE At 7:50 p.m., Mr. Harrison called the public hearing in regard to the application of Tri -Land Properties for rezoning from Agricultural to R-1 single family, and preliminary plat for Danbury Addition with a variance from R-1 requirements in the northwest quarter of Section 23, surrounded by the Lexington Square Additions. It was noted that the preceding applicant on the agenda was not yet ready, and requested to be placed later on the agenda. City Planner Runkle presented the application for the 17 lots completely surrounded by previously platted additions of Lexington Square. He indicated that a Comprehensive Guide Amendment was not required, however, a variance would be needed from R-1 requirements. The Lexington Square parcels surrounding the proposed plat did consist of lots of similar dimensions. Mr. Brad Swenson was present on behalf of the applicant consisting of an out-of- state partnership. Mr. Bill Kennedy of Lot 4, Block 7, Lexington Square was present and expressed concern regarding the value of the homes to be constructed in comparison to the homes presently built in that area. Mr. Swenson advised that the same builders, College City Builders, would be building the homes of a very similar nature to the ones in Mr. Kennedy's addition. The public hearing was closed. Discussion centered around the size of the lots in comparison to the surrounding lots. Voracek moved to recommend approval of the rezoning with a variance for the proposed lot dimensions to coincide with the residential lots surrounding the proposed plat', Krisnik seconded the motion and all voted in favor. Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five PRELIMINARY PLATZBOULDER RIDGE G. Preliminary Plat for Boulder Ridge Consisting of 71 Townhouse Units on Approximately 18 Acres --A public hearing was considered by the APC at their regular meeting held on February 26, 1987 to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by New American Homes entitled Boulder Ridge Addition. The APC is recommending approval of this development to the City Council. For a copy of the Planning and Engineering recommendations and the parkland dedication as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission, refer to those reports found on pages through �. For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page(s),9 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled Boulder Ridge consisting of 71 townhouse units. 176 CITY OF RAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (BOULDER RIDGE -REVISED) APPLICANT: NEW AMERICAN HOMES LOCATION: OUTLOT A, THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS, NE 1/4 OF SECTION 28 EXISTING ZONING: R-3, WITHIN THE BLACKHAWK PARK P.D. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 24, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: A revised site plan has been submitted to the City requesting a preliminary plat for the Boulder Ridge Addition. The original plan was denied approval by the Advisory Planning Commission in December, 1986 and due to dissatisfaction of that Commission, the applicant withdrew the proposal (with Council approval) prior to formal Council review so that the negative situations could be resolved. This new plan contains 71 units (1 less) on the same 18.7 gross acres abutting C.R. 30 on the north, Thomas Lake Road and approximately 2.2 undeveloped acres of the Deerfield apartment project on the west and Heine Pond/Parkland on the east. This townhouse proposal is consistent with the Blackhawk Planned Development Agreement. EXISTING LAND USE: Surrounding land uses are single family to the south and east of Heine Pond and R-3 to the south. The undeveloped 2.2 acres of the Deerfield project east of Thomas Lake Road was designated for 14 units. The overall density for this project after the park dedication is approximately 8 units per acre. The buildings.remain unchanged and each unit has approximately 900 square feet of building coverage with a total site coverage of 16% on the 9.2 acres to be developed. The other 9.5 acres are to be dedicated to the City for a neighborhood park facility. The site is mostly open grassland except for a wooded, brushy area to the west along that property line and the hillside of jack pines that would have been destroyed with the previous plan. SITE PLAN REVISIONS: These owner occupied units will still be serviced by a single access for 65 units from Thomas Lake Road and for 6 units from a public cul-de-sac that has a private drive connecting to it. Parking for the City's park will also be provided along the S.E. portion of that cul-de-sac like that at South Oaks Park. The most noticeable change at a glance is the significant shortening of that cul-de-sac. By decreasing its length, no measurable grading will occur near Heine Pond. ri% The need for the 16 foot tall, 230 foot length retaining wall has also been eliminated. All of the units with walkouts facing the pond should match the existing grade with only minor grading. In addition, this area has been designated as a conservation easement. This will not allow the developer to do any tree clearing without City approval. The City forester will also oversee any selective tree thinning prior to construction. selective thinning. is necessary to ensure the strength and health of tree stands/forests. A similar situation was included with the landscape plan for the Thomas Lake Apartments. Two nice design features are the elimination of units facing C.R. 30 and that 13 units will have uninterrupted views into the park. All units meet R-3 setback requirements except for Unit 60 on the west end of the small cul-de-sac. A variance is needed to allow a 10 foot setback deviation to 20 feet along a public street. This will allow the building to match the existing grades closer and will usually appear more consistent with the other buildings. 118 REVISED REPORT GRADING & DRAINAGE: As with the original proposal, this development is located on the western slopes of Heine Pond which has an existing - elevation differential of 65' from the high point near Thomas Lake Road to the low point near Heine Pond. The revised development grading plan results in major excavation and fills over the majority of this site with the exception of the proposed Conservation Easement area over the heavily wooded steep side slope on the western edges of Heine Pond. The maximum cut will be approximately 12' near Thomas Lake Road with the maximum fills of approximately 13' occurring along the westerly property line. The construction of the short cul-de-sac from Diffley Road will require fills of about 10-12'. The proposed elevations of the townhouse urrits along the westerly property line will require the construction of 5'-7' high retaining walls or the acquisition of fill -slope easements and the removal of some potential tree buffer area on the property adjacent to the west boundary. The stub street for the nine townhouse units in the extreme northwest corner should have a high point constructed at its intersection with the loop street to minimize the overflow runoff into the Diffley Road ditch section. In addition, a catch basin should be installed at the northern end of this private drive and drain back to the internal loop street storm sewer system. Also, a ditch type inlet catch basin structure will have to be constructed on the west side of the proposed short cul-de-sac from Diffley Road to intercept the existing and redirected County raod ditch drainage. Due to the existing water quality concerns for Heine Pond, the majority of surface water runoff generated from this development must be intercepted by internal storm sewer facilities and discharged directly into the existing trunk storm sewer line. Heine Pond (BP -5) is a DNR protected wetland (15364) below 'the 877.2 elevation. In order to construct the short cul-de-sac from Diffley Road, the grading plan as submitted will require a DNR permit for filling within the protected wetland area. An alternative would be the construction of a 5' high retaining wall at the eastern slope of the proposed cul-de-sac next to Heine Pond. The proposed cul-de-sac from Diffley Road shall have a minimum centerline elevation of 895.0 at the right-of-way line to match into the future Diffley Road elevations. UTILITIES: Sanitary' sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth to handle this proposed development is provided by the existing trunk system located along the western edge of Heine Pond. The proposed internal lateral collection system with a stubr extension to the west and a singular connection point to the trunk system near Diffley Road is feasible for this development. Water main of sufficient size, pressure and capacity is provided by both the 12" trunk water main in Thomas Lake Road and the 12" trunk water main in Di f f ley Road. However, the proposed 3" and 4" water services for the cul-de-sac �� in the northwest corner, respectively, must be increased to a minimum 6" diameter with a hydrant at the terminal end. Each unit shall be serviced with its own individual sewer and water service from these internal trunk lateral distribution and collection systems. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: This development is proposed to be serviced entirely by a private street system which must have a minimum width of 28' and minimum building setbacks of 25' from the back of curb. This development is proposed to be serviced primarily from Thomas Lake Road which is currently constructed to its ultimate design section. Six units will be serviced through the construction of a public cul-de-sac taking direct access to County Road 30 (Diffley Road) which is proposed to be upgraded to its ultimate design section by 1988. The location of this cul-de-sac intersection provides good sight distance -in both directions but must be approved by the Dakota County Highway'Department. The entrance for this cul-de-sac must be constructed at an elevation higher than Diffley Road to ensure that all drainage is contained within the County Road gutter line. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate all easements necessary for the internal sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer system of sufficient dimensions as required by final alignment and depth designs. This development shall provide additional utility easements for the existing trunk sanitary and storm sewer system to ensure that no building is located closer than 25' from the centerline of those facilities. Because this plat is adjacent to County Road 30, it shall be subject to all right-of-way and slope easement dedications necessary for the upgrading of Diffley Road. A ponding and drainage easement shall be dedicated incorporating the 887.0 elevation for Heine Pond. This development will have to obtain the appropriate utility and access construction permits from the County Highway Department for the sanitary sewer, storm sewer and street construction within their right-of-way. Temporary slope easements or agreements will have to be obtained from the property owner to the west if the retaining wall is not constructed. This development shall be responsible for ensuring that all regulatory agency permits are acquired prior to final plat approval or building permit issuance, whichever is required by the affected agency. The required conservation easement for the side hill on the west side of Heine Pond shall be properly conveyed and recorded simultaneously with the final plat. ASSESSMENTS: This parcel was previously assessed trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer in addition to lateral benefit �0U from trunk sanitary sewer and trunk water main and the residential equivalent for Thomas Lake Road. However, several of these assessments were based on the agricultural/single-family zoning rate and will have to be upgraded for this proposed multiple density development. These additional assessments are identified as follows: ITEM Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main (Thomas Lk. Rd.) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main (Diffley Rd.) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Storm Sewer Thomas Lake Road Diffley Road (Future Street) Diffley Road Trail (Future) 1987 RATE QUANTITY $8.08/f.f.* $546/f.f. $20.55/f.f. $582/f.f. $10.80/f.f.* $600/f.f. $31.09/f.f.-$546/f.f. $66.53/f.f. $582/f.f. $12.40/f.f. $582/f.f. AMOUNT PROTECT # $4,412 237 $11,960 137 $ 6,180 237 $16,975 237 $38,720 $7,217 TOTAL ............................................. $85,464 * This rate is the difference between multiple residential rate and the previously assessed agricultural/single-family rate. The rates quoted are 1987 and the quantities calculated are based on preliminary plat information. The final rates shall be those in effect at the time of final plat approval or related project approval by Council action, whichever occurs first. All quantities shall be based on final figures contained in the final plat documents. /g/ CONDITIONS: BOULDER RIDGE i; All private streets and public utilities necessary to service this development shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the Engineering Division and in accordance with City standards, policies and codes. 2. All surface water drainage from this development shall be intercepted and discharged directly into ttie existing trunk storm sewer facility. 3. A final detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the Engineering Division prior to final plat approval. 4. All required retaining walls shall be constructed in accordance with City standards and Codes. 5. All internal streets shall have a minimum width of 28' and a minimum cul-de-sac radius of 40'. 6. No structural building shall be located closer than 25' to the centerline of the existing trunk sanitary sewer or storm sewer facilities. 7. This development shall acquire or dedicate all necessary utility easements, public rights-of-way and temporary slope ponding easements as required by the City or the County. 8. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all required regulatory agency permits in accordance with their stipulated time frames. 9. This development shall be responsible for the upgrading of trunk related assessments associated with the rezoning and any additional trunk areas, lateral benefit or front footage assessments previously not levied and/or associated with the future upgrading of County. -Road 30. 10. This development shall extend a sanitary sewer lateral to the west -property line for future extension and service to the undeveloped property to the west. 11. This development shall be subject to all conditions and restrictions of Dakota County regarding its proposed street access and platting adjacent to County right-of-way. 12. r paneling easement shall be dedicated incorporating the 887.0 elevation around Heine Pond. 13. The required conservation easement for the side hill on the west side of Heine Pond shall be properly conveyed and recorded simultaneously with the final plat. 187 CONDITIONS BOULDER RIDGE - REVISED: 14. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 15. A 10 foot setback variance to 20 feet shall be granted for Unit 60. 16. A copy of the homeowners association's bylaws shall be reviewed by the City Attorney. 17. The parkland dedication shall be fulfilled in accordance with the P.D. Agreement and the APRC recommendations. 18. A financial guarantee for the landscaping shall not be released until after 1 year from the installation date. /0 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 1987 RE: BOULDER RIDGE - ADVISORY PARKS & REC COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS BACKGROUND The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the initial Boulder Ridge proposal at its January Commission meeting. At that 'meeting, the Commission rejected the plan as it pertained to the proposed parks dedication. The Commission made six recommendations for revisions to the plat in order to make it acceptable for parks. The developer has met with department staff and the Development Committee of the Advisory Commission in order to incorporate the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission's recommendations and to meet other staff concerns. NEW PLAT SUBMISSION The developer has submitted a revised preliminary plat for Boulder Ridge. Commission reviewed this new submission at its February Commission meeting. The Commission is recommending acceptance of the parks dedication of 9.5 acres shown on the new revised plat. SUMMATION The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission has reviewed the new preliminary plat submission and is forwarding a recommendation to the City Council for acceptance and approval of parks dedication within this plat. ly submitted, of Parks & Recreation KV1js CC: Tom Colbert - Director of Public Works LOCATION ZONING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN C-1 l , R Li R-11 LE / r� m Mol Ll yl III In O rl in vv Tx fill" ::j Mon OC UO r- z PI mV r Mol yl III In rl in vv Tx fill" ::j Mon UO Mol NORMAN I- LR81 3 7A. $0.6 AP -23 889.3 .900.01/) BOULDER RIDGE ADD SUBJECT PARCEL" I J Can city of eagan PUBLIC STORM SEWER WORKS DEPARTMENT1 MASTER PLAN 82 83- FIG. # 1 approved: standard I plate #: V . Lj _ r- — BLACKN, FI$ j/ CITY T - R CE �1_ , .�.. 3.. HALL �i _ HALL i... T -�.. a � - � -- . Z /� --- ©LACKHAVYK C H T PARK ©Kati ty, ' _� �y SK YDAIIE R , IVO. 2: 4 33,1 Cb r —�— ! -- - ' IOWD L F. 27, 15 _ ` 33 . P �`il �� ` r 't � � r.S;`�•'� Y ' t Er arsr�E HILLAMDALE �. �. — �..� 11 a 27 43 itn 3__ d YM � � Y �j' 27# x 1',`.� / J THOMAS ca } 1 H 7✓r W— N .H SCHOOL OWFR T 811 .24, !_ �rwp ., c+•N PTT"reelrE �,i P rQi — — ��••���✓✓✓ 7 5 jj..{�[ t rbS.d_ hi THOMAS LAKE t�., w �- /'ti.;'` yf ' t S 7= PARK ^t 44 ..�SAFARi I city of eagan PUBLIC $1 �� WORKS DEPARTME BOULDER RIDGE ADD, =.SUBJECT PA.RCEL.,. 7���. FIG.. #2 SANITARY SEWER approved: standard plate # MASTER PLAN LIAN PARK 16 BLACKHAWK �'4n I PARK r/ /I K F /� r4WD dale ...w doom16.'�K 1LDAyE I A0 51.7/67.0 iilY l 123 121 118" S OW1 ` IB" 52.6/67.0 / p 120 59.9/75_ 177 -6 M.Gi2�A��' n L -J 59.8/76.0 1N6 SfOR11GE) 124 44.6/59.0 11 Vlilll,10 _ � - 2, f .J 1020 1.61 38.3/94.0 !4 12" ) pATR14. O i (- 2EAGA 1.8/3?0 16Iso 162 6. /\ 1}\ f\Y,V PARK �� .5/ 82.8/ 14.0 „ 100.0 a V(0,(4R5.O 16 /107.0 42.6!. 7.0 r• S A HI " z 164 165 I,�n 172 11 12n'.iti` .��� 68.0/82.0 1021 I I — 159 I IT 43,2/$80_ 35.5/50.0 2� 80.7/92.0 v 16" m 16 _ t{e1p-ice�+' uu �,,fj����.rry :4 � T � ' I - THOMAS 158 81.1/92.0 3 EI n I H G ,S e SCHOOL � POWER,._- _ UTILITY T ENT j31 173 X 71 CTi ` T`I.��D - - f$7 /94.0 — — THOMAS LAIC 169 PARK 56, ti l a ild� - I i s. 86.0/ .0 Q f ��r `c4s.r_ � if�`� '4~v.•^�J ��''L�i.-4 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME 3 A SAFARI tA�'�1 1020 08 AT � - { I E A8 FP SIT 1�,• 2 7 91.1 r: WE �{ E e } 7TT1LiyG n' 42 f 24"`41:"/ T. '�13 212 1 24„ $4• r- r i rc 2 215 83.4/91 kO 74.0 211 2'0 70.5/74.0.2 M.G. GROUND STORAGE3000 G.P.M. BOOSTER H.W. 1055. .BOULDER RIDGE ADD SUBJECT PARCEL r. 411 FIG. *3 WATER approved : standard plate # MASTER PLAN T t� if ao T T �I O O -he re-, 'i -s rt o ,pGqe. J APC Minutes February 26, 1987 The applicant advised the Advisory Planning Commission that the proposed range for homes would be $95,.000.00 to $110,000.00. Voracek moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved prior to final plat approval. 2. This development shall be responsible for any outstanding, unlevied or deferred assessments or other financial obligations associated with this development at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 3. All publicly dedicated streets and utilities shall be designed in accordance with City standards and constructed in accordance with City approved plans and specifications. 4. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits within their time frame required by the affected agency. 5. All'standard platting conditions. shall be adhered to. 6. A variance allowing 3.15 units per acre shall be granted with R-1 side yard setback requirements. 7. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 8. The applicant shall conserve the grove of trees located in the northwest corner of the proposed plat. All voted affirmatively. BOULDER RIDGE - PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Harrison 'then convened the public hearing on the request of New American Homes for a preliminary plat of Boulder Ridge Addition located on Outlot A, Thomas Lake Heights in the northeast quarter of Section 28. Mr. Runkle advised the Commission that a revised site plan had been submitted to the City requesting a preliminary plat for Boulder Ridge Addition. The original plan was denied approval by the Advisory Planning Commission in December of 1986 due to dissatisfaction of the Commission with items which had now been addressed in the revision. The applicant had on its own, withdrawn its application prior to council review so that the concerns of the commission could be addressed. Mr. Greg Frank was present on behalf of the applicant and presented Mr. Dave Sellergren who provided a history of this particular proposal, which had been rezoned from Commercial PD to R-3 PD with approximately one-half of the parcel to be dedicated for park land. In 1980, 120 units had been proposed. In 1984, 75 units were approved, and a new proposal now included only 74 units and reduced the length of the cul-de-sac 1�7 APC Minutes February 26, 1987 immediately west of Heine Lake. Mr. Sellergren stated that a conservation easement is to be provided to the City to protect the pine grove, in addition to the required park dedication. Runoff of all storm waters on the site was to be picked up by the storm line and storm sewer plan to protect Heine Lake. The proposal contained 8 units per acre within the 6 to 12 units allowed. 16% site coverage was being proposed. A member of the public appeared to express concern regarding the buffer to the south for the Clemson Court homes and questioned the location of the cul-de-sac relative to Clemson Court. It was pointed out that while the cul-de-sac adjacent to the pond may represent a traffic hazard at the present time, the upgrading of Diffley Road should facilitate safe ingress and egress. Mr. Richard Croke of 1511 Clemson Court questioned the price range of the townhomes which Mr. Sellergren indicated would be between approximately $80,000.00 to $90,000.00. Ms. Dawn Anderson also of Clemson Court, questioned the quality of the water in Heine Pond and the effect thereon of the proposed construction. Mr. Colbert indicated that the plan provided for control of the storm sewer runoff and also in response to her question regarding trees, indicated that a conservation easement would prevent the destruction of the pine grove. The public hearing was closed and Gustafson moved and Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All private streets and public utilities necessary to service this development shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the Engineering Division and in accordance with City standards, policies and codes. 2. All surface water drainage from this development shall be intercepted and discharged directly into the existing trunk storm sewer facility. 3. A final detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the Engineering Division prior to final plat approval. 4. All required retaining walls shall be constructed in accordance with City standards and Codes. 5. All internal streets shall have a minimum width of 28 feet and a minimum cul-de-sac radius of 40 feet. 6. No structural building shall be located closer than 25 feet to the centerline of the existing trunk sanitary sewer or storm sewer facilities. 7. This development shall acquire or dedicate all necessary utility easements, public rights-of-way and temporary slope ponding easements as required by the City or the County. 8. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all required regulatory agency permits in accordance with their stipulated time frames. IK APC Minutes February 26, 1987 9. This development shall be responsible for the upgrading of trunk related assessments associated with the rezoning and any additional trunk areas, lateral benefit or.front footage assessments previously not levied and/or associated with the future upgrading of County Road. 30. 10. This development shall extend a sanitary sewer lateral to the west property line for future extension and service to the undeveloped property to the west. 11. This development shall be subject to all conditions and restrictions of Dakota County regarding its proposed street access and platting adjacent to County right-of-way. 12. A ponding easement shall be dedicated incorporating the 887.0 elevation around Heine Pond. 13. The required conservation easement for the side hill on the west side of Heine Pond shall be properly conveyed and recorded simultaneously with the final plat. 14. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 15. A 10 foot setback variance to 20 feet shall be granted for Unit 60. 16. A copy of the homeowners association's by-laws shall be reviewed by the City Attorney. 17. The park land dedication shall be fulfilled in accordance with the PD Agreement and the Advisory Park and Recreation Commission recommendations. 18. A financial guarantee for the landscaping shall not be released until after one year from the installation date. All voted yea. The commission complimented the developer on coming back with a much more improved proposal. WOODLANDS ADDITION - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing called by Mr. Harrison was upon the application of Robert Engstrom Associates for rezoning of 73.2 Agricultural acres to R-1 Single Family and a preliminary plat consisting of 125 lots located in the southeast quarter of Section 14. Mr. Runkle indicated that the Comprehensive Guide Amendment was not necessary and that the developer had been working with the developer of property directly to the west to provide a good, larger than required single family development, which resulted in swaps of land to facilitate curvilinear streets and minimum destruction of natural vegetation and topography. All lots exceed R-1 requirements with an average of 20,000 square feet. /Y7 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six COMP_R_E_HENSIV_E GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR DANBURY PLACE ADDITION H. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning from A to R-1 and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 17 Lots Entitled Danbury Place Addition --A public hearing was held by the APC at their February 26, 1987 meeting, to consider three (3) applications submitted by Tri - Land Properties which include a comprehensive guide plan amendment, rezoning from A to R-1 and a preliminary plat entitled Danbury Place. The APC is recommending approval of all three (3) applications. This development includes a number of lots that do not conform with the R-1 lot width standards of 85 feet or the 12,000 square foot minimum size requirement. Therefore, the developer is asking for a variance to deviate from these two standards. For additional information on this item, refer to the staff report, a copy is enclosed on pages X1 through ;�06 for your review. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission is recommending a cash dedication payment to satisfy the parkland dedication requirements. For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page(s)Z0 Z10� ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny: 1. a comprehensive guide plan amendment from D-2 to D-1, 2. a rezoning from A to R-1 and 3. a preliminary plat entitled Danbury Place Addition. Za0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, VARIANCE, (DANBURY ADDITION) APPLICANT: TRI -LAND PROPERTIES LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF SECTION 23 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 26, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 16, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATIONS: Two applications have been submitted, requesting a rezoning from an Agricultural district to a R-1 (single family) district and a preliminary plat for the Danbury Addition. This plat consists of 17 lots on 5.5 acres that was an exception to the Lexington South P.D. and includes -an additional lot that currently is Outlot A of the Lexington Square 3rd Addition. Both the existing and recently adopted land use plans designate this area R-2 and D-2 respectively, therefore an amendment will not be necessary. EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: This site is surrounded by Lexington Square Additions on all four sides. This exception is currently a farmstead with a house, barn and smaller accessory structure. All will be removed with this proposal. Mature trees are found around the existing buildings on the west side of the property. The remaining portion of the site is open grassland. This plan calls for the westerly extention of Danbury Trail connecting to the north/south Gibralter Trail. Outlot A is the area immediately east of Lot 9, Block 2. The 18 lots on 5.7 gross acres give this project a density of 3.15 units per acre. The lots range in size from 10,800 - 16,632 square feet with the exception of Outlot A. It measures 80' x 120' (9,600 square feet). Fourteen lots have 75 foot widths at the setback line, matching those to the north in the 3rd Addition. Three other lots' widths are +80 feet and one is ±110 feet. The lot configurations work well with the previously platted lots. Therefore, a variance to deviate from the R-1 lot width standard of 85' at the setback line and the 12,000 S.F. minimum size requirement would be the most practical solution to amend the Code without rezoning to a P.S. district. All R-1 side yard setback requirements would remain intact. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size, capacity and depth is available and has been stubbed to this development for extension as a part of the surrounding Lexington Square 1st Addition. GRADING & DRAINAGE: The property in its present state generally drains from east to west. However, with the proposed grading plan, this development will be split providing even distribution of drainage to the east and west. This subdivision is surrounded by existing single-family lots which have already been graded to their final elevations. Therefore, this development shall not direct any drainage through existing common side lot lines of the surrounding development, but rather contain all drainage within backyard drainage swales and direct it to the new internal street construction or to the existing backyard catch basin in the southeast corner of this development. All drainage swales shall be constructed to a minimum 1.0% slope. In the northwest corner of this development, there is an existing grove of trees that should be saved and taken into consideration in designing the final drainage swales. The required backyard drainage swales shall not restrict, but rather accommodate existing drainage from the surrounding single-family properties as it may presently occur. Catch basins shall be installed on the proposed Danbury Drive at its intersection with Gibraltar Trail to intersect street runoff prior to entering the intersection. STREETS: This development will be serviced by the extension and continuation of Danbury Drive from Savannah Road on the east to Gibraltar Trail on the west. It shall be constructed to typical residential street design standards of 7 -ton design, 32' wide with 15' radii. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate a GO' right-of-way necessary to provide for the continuation of the Danbury Drive street improvements. In addition to the common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate sufficient drainage easements to incorporate the required drainage swales as defined by the final approved grading plan. No unusual permit requirements are anticipated beyond the normal MPGA, MWCC and Dept. of Health review for sanitary sewer and water extensions. OTHER: It is recommended that this development incorporate Outlot A of Lexington Square 3rd Addition on the east end to allow its development. It has already been serviced with improved streets and required City utilities, but was platted as an Outlot to restrict a home construction until this proposed development took place. �Z t ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer assessments have been previously levied at the single-family rates over the property proposed to be developed. Therefore, there are no additional assessment obligations associated with this proposed development other than those that may be related to the installation of required streets and utilities under a public improvement project, which would be identified with the appropriate feasibility report and public hearing process. CONDITIONS: DANBURY ADDITION 1. The final detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved prior to final plat approval. 2. This development shall be responsible for any outstanding, unlevied or deferred assessments or other financial obligations associated with this development at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 3. All publicly dedicated streets and utilities shall be designed in accordance with City standards and constructed in accordance with City approved plans and specifications. 4. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits within their time frame required by the affected agency. 5. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 6. A variance allowing 3.15 units per acre shall be granted with R-1 side yard setback requirements. 7. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. C13 ao�{ c�l D-11 .0 L) -1 P II j { J -I D -II ; 0 I !� P D=11 ' e e , HS P D -II w: III M + . DI I . E N rOOr OCT SQUARE N2109,33'W m Nt09'3vw `�y4.09 +► 14389 ,+*I' r M A- Y 1- 7 A A A r O r 9* ooh ! g=0a Aro A AA C w it r RtCCW�D J A` t Silt TRI - LAND INC. PLANNERS • ENGINEERS SURVEYORS � /p/CEL.//`7//WRY G/E�iiE � CA/V �+• a ••—•• ••• �• tea• rx rcas .o.o rw [•••w,riwi[aora swiss i•R�•Sa-nw O� mm(YOCT / / � / RECENCEDJ-h27q ,` .■ �ANBUR y�|_� ^l » Sr � .!■| � SW E. a■: 'E|7- ! �k§B o� ���0� |>----� ® PLANNERS. ENGINEERS �� ; | 2 | - --r- | r u,Iw � / ! . Baa -- -2 It .�.�• f . f ■ - -- — 2 — 22:'52 @ .4|i to* 1 CD C �� .��; :•= I� i ::r | It s§U#9 WE ,`§#['�� , _ , . • I TIM'. §] • .4' R=: � �'�� �I RECENCEDJ-h27q ,` .■ �ANBUR y�|_� � .!■| � TRI -LAND INC. a■: 'E|7- �k§B o� ���0� |>----� ® PLANNERS. ENGINEERS ARY PLAT - § . � / ! -2 It .�.�• RECENCEDJ-h27q ,` .■ �ANBUR y�|_� 'D b('5 TRI -LAND INC. o� ���0� |>----� ® PLANNERS. ENGINEERS ARY PLAT SURVEYORS)RR£WJ-111V _.,__ ���° 'D b('5 APC Minutes February 26, 1987 1. The fact that the pumps would be provided without a direct tie to service bays as required under the ordinance. 2. That the service bays would be located too close to the cemetery area. 3. That the gas pumps and lighting were too close to the residential areas. Harrison seconded the motion to put the matter on the floor. Gustafson, Krisnik and Harrison voted yea; Trygg voted nay; and Voracek abstained. The motion passed. JAMES UNKER - WAIVER OF PLAT Chairman Harrison then called the public hearing in regard to the request for waiver of plat by James Unker for lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition, in the southeast quarter of Section 29. Mr. Runkle introduced the application. Mr. Unker was present and requested that the matter be tabled to allow him to review the conditions proposed by City staff in regard to the request of lot split. There was significant discussion in regard to the large number of easements required to service the property. There was no one from the public to respond. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to continue the matter to the regular March APC meeting. All voted yes. DANBURY ADDITION - REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT & VARIANCE At 7:50 p.m., Mr. Harrison called the public hearing in regard to the application of Tri -Land Properties for rezoning from Agricultural to R-1 single family, and preliminary plat for Danbury Addition with a variance from R-1 requirements in the northwest quarter of Section 23, surrounded by the Lexington Square Additions. It was noted that the preceding applicant on the agenda was not yet ready, and requested to be placed later on the agenda., City Planner Runkle presented the application for the 17 lots completely surrounded by previously platted additions of Lexington Square. He indicated that a Comprehensive Guide Amendment was not required, however, a variance would be needed from R-1 requirements. The Lexington Square parcels surrounding the proposed plat did consist of lots of similar dimensions. Mr. Brad Swenson was present on behalf of the applicant consisting of an out-of- state partnership. Mr. Bill Kennedy of Lot 4, Block 7, Lexington Square was present and expressed concern regarding the value of the homes to be constructed in comparison to the homes presently built in that area. Mr. Swenson advised that the same builders, College City Builders, would be building the homes of a very similar nature to the ones in Mr. Kennedy's addition. The public hearing was closed. Discussion centered around the size of the lots in comparison to the surrounding lots. Voracek moved to recommend approval of the rezoning with a variance for the proposed lot dimensions to coincide with the residential lots surrounding the proposed plat, Krisnik seconded the motion and all voted in favor. P7 3 APC Minutes February 26, 1987 The applicant advised the Advisory Planning Commission that the proposed range for homes would be $95,000.00 to $110,000.00. Voracek moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved prior to final plat approval. 2. This development shall be responsible for any outstanding, unlevied or deferred assessments or other financial obligations associated with this development at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 3. All publicly dedicated streets and utilities shall be designed in accordance with City standards and constructed in accordance with City approved plans and specifications. 4. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits within their time frame required by the affected agency. 5. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 6. A variance allowing 3.15 units per acre shall be granted with R-1 side yard setback requirements. 7. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. 8. The applicant shall conserve the grove of trees located in the northwest corner of the proposed plat. All voted affirmatively. BOULDER RIDGE - PRELIMINARY PLAT Mr. Harrison then convened the public hearing on the request of New American Homes for a preliminary plat of Boulder Ridge Addition located on Outlot A, Thomas Lake Heights in the northeast quarter of Section 28. Mr. Runkle advised the Commission that a revised site plan had been submitted to the City requesting a preliminary plat for Boulder Ridge Addition. The original plan was denied approval by the Advisory Planning Commission in December of 1986 due to dissatisfaction of the Commission with items which had now been addressed in the revision. The applicant had on its own, withdrawn its application prior to council review so that the concerns of the commission could be addressed. Mr. Greg Frank was present on behalf of the applicant and presented Mr. Dave Sellergren who provided a history of this particular proposal, which had been rezoned from Commercial PD to R-3 PD with approximately one-half of the parcel to be dedicated for park land. In 1980, 120 units had been proposed. In 1984, 75 units were approved, and a new proposal now included only 74 units and reduced the length of the cul-de-sac 4 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT WOODLANDS ADDITION I. Rezoning from A to R-1 and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 125 Lots for Woodlands Addition --A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting, held on February 26, to consider an application submitted by Robert Engstrom Associates to rezone from A to R-1 and plat 125 lots on 73 acres referenced as Woodlands Addition. The APC is recommending approval of both the Rezoning and Preliminary Plat. For additional information on this item refer to the staff report enclosed on pages -=_ through 2z3 . For a copy of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission action refer to page ZL�( For a copy of the APC minutes on this action refer to pages ZZs through �. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the Rezoning from A to R-1 and the Preliminary Plat entitled Woodlands Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT (WOODLANDS.ADD.) APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM ASSOCIATES LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 26, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 17, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATIONS: Two separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of 73.2 (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district and a preliminary plat for The Woodlands. This plat consists of 125 lots and is located in the S.E. 1/4 of Section 14. The existing Land Use Plan and the recently adopted plan designate this area as R-1 and D-1 respectively. Therefore, an amendment will not be necessary. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This site is located west of the Windtree and South Oak Additions and an existing single family agricultural parcel. ,The Wescott Garden Lots and an undeveloped R-4 district are to the north. The Sunrise Addition proposal is along the entire western side of this project. There was a concentrated effort made by both applicants to develop this unique area with as little disturbance as possible to the native conditions. The western area in the middle 1/3 of the site and the southerly 1/4 of the site have been cultivated farmland. The rest of the site is dominated by a deciduous forest with both over and understory plant material. This site is characterized by steep slopes, ponding areas and very little or no flat land. The need for cul-de-sacs is fully apparent in this area of Eagan.' The Williams Pipeline easement crosses the site in a northeasterly manner in the northwesternmost portion of the site. The area north of that easement will become an outlot. SITE PLAN: The primary access to the site is through a single northerly flowing street that is stubbed to the Wescott Garden Lots. The elevation of this road is fairly level and the cul-de-sacs that branch off of it try to match an existing high point or low point as often as possible. This should help reduce unnecessary grading and the loss of trees. The applicant is proposing'tear drop shaped cul- de-sacs with islands containing maintenance free native vegetation in an effort to restore the area as close to the pregrading conditions as can be expected. Six of these cul-de-sacs face towards a 'hole' that is +40' below the street grades. Two of these are longer than the 500' permitted by Code and will need variance approvals. The lots vary in size from 12,000 S.F. to 111,195 S.F. and average approximately 20,500 S.F. The gross density is 1.72 units per acre. As with the Chatterton Ponds subdivision, additional entry landscaping and buffering along the adjacent major city street will be provided. The developer will also retain architectural control of the houses and have other covenants governing trash pick up and additional landscaping. UTILITIES: Water service to this development will be provided by the proposed 12" water main, scheduled to be constructed within Wescott Road under City contract during 1987. This will provide adequate pressure and supply to this proposed subdivision. An 8" water main shall be constructed from Wescott Road through this development to the north boundary for future extension and connection to the future east/west 16" trunk water main. Adequate stubs should be provided for extension and connection to the proposed Sunrise Addition on the east within public right-of-way. This development is located within the sanitary drainage district N- W which was proposed to be serviced by the existing 9" sewer within Elrene Road. After considerable review of the capacity and elevation of this existing sanitary sewer and the topography between Elrene Road and this development, it is acceptable to redirect that portion of district N -W, located in the southeast quarter of Section 14, to the proposed easterly extension of the trunk sanitary seder within Wescott Road anticipated during 1907. Ey maintaining a minimum slope along Wescott Road and throughout this subdivision, it will be able to provide service to all property above the 880.0 elevation. The internal sanitary sewer lateral shall be extended at minimum grades to the north and northeast property lines within street right- of-way for future extension and connection with the development of those adjacent properties. No extensions are necessary for the proposed Sunrise Addition due to elevation constraints.' An 8" sanitary sewer lateral with a terminal manhole shall be constructed from the most southeasterly cul-de-sac to the 2 -acre exception in the southeast corner (Parcel #020-78). GRADING/DRAINAGE: This proposed development consists of very heavily wooded and rolling topography with very steep side slopes and maximum elevation differentials of 113+/- ft. Subsequently, there are severe topographical constraints that limit the feasibility of creating buildable lots in -several areas and, in other areas, requires a variance to the front yard setback ordinance. Based on the grading plan submitted, the short cul-de- sac in the northwest corner of the plat is not feasible and should be eliminated resulting in a loss of two lots. Similarily, the 610' cul-de-sac in the northeast corner should be pulled further to the south to create a bench area for housing pads if these are to be considered buildable lots. Also, the short cul-de-sacs on the east side of the main north/south through street also raised questions about creating buildable lots due to the rapid change in elevation and should subsequently be eliminated. These cul-de-sac adjustments and/or eliminations would result in a reduction of an additional 5-7 lots. v ( A major area of concern relates to the installation of the required trunk storm sewer facilities to provide adequate drainage for this development and upstream drainage districts. Due to the extreme elevation differential and heavily wooded topography, interconnection of the designated trunk storm water ponds would result in significant destruction of trees to construct the 65'-75' deep storm sewer systems. Subsequently, the staff is reviewing possible revisions to the overall Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan to try and isolate Pond JP -61 in the northwest corner and Pond JP -12 in the east central portion of this plat from receiving any direct storm water runoff, thereby eliminating the need for the construction of the deep trunk storm sewer outlets. Subsequently, the final drainage design and internal lateral storm sewer distribution system will have to be designed in accordance with the ultimate revisions to the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan prior to final plat approval. It will be necessary for the required trunk area storm sewer improvements to be installed to provide adequate downstream drainage to Wescott Road near the Lexington Square development before this development can proceed. Trunk area storm sewer facilities are presently in place from the Lexington Square development to the Minnesota River. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this development will be provided by Wescott Road which is proposed to be upgraded to a 4 - lane design with trai lways on both sides during 1987. Because of the topography, this development is proposing nine cul-de-sacs. Referencing the discussion regarding buildable lots under the grading portion of this report, it is recommended that three of the short cul-de-sacs be eliminated. In addition, the two parallel cul- de-sacs in the southeastern portion of the plat are not necessitated by topography or boundary constraints and should be connected providing a U-s.1laped circulation movement. A stub street is provided along the western portion of this plat for extension into the proposed Sunrise Addition. In the northwestern corner, two streets are proposed for extension with the future development of the adjacent unplatted property. At these two northerly locations, temporary cul-de-sacs will have to be constructed for removal and extension when the adjacent property develops. Until the property to the north and northwest develops, this development will have a 1,400' - 1,700' long "dead end" street circulation configuration. It should be noted that no street access is being provided to the 2.0 acre exception in the extreme southeast corner limiting its ability to subdivide. Consideration should be given to incorporating this exception within the planned layout of this development. _ Due to the.present rural ditch gravel road section of Prescott Road, this development should not proceed until Wescott Road has been ordered for improvement to its ultimate design section. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: A 50' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Wescott Road. The internal "through" streets provide the necessary 60' right-of-way. However, all cul-de-sacs are only providing a 50' right-of-way with a 60' radius for the "bubble". With the proposed internal center islands, the cul-de-sac bubble must have a minimum radius of 65'. ZZ- Final detailed drainage and utility easements cannot be accurately determined until the overall Comprehensive Storm Sewer revisions have been analyzed and incorporated into this proposed development. At that time, appropriate high water ponding easements and utility alignment easements will have to be dedicated on the final plat as required by the City. Construction of utilities and streets at the northern end of this development will require the acquisition of a permit from the Williams Brothers Pipeline Company. Because of the rough tomography and limitation of grading, no slope easements are anticipated from adjacent private property. The acquisition of all regulatory agency permits for the utility system installation will be the responsibility of this development within the required time f.:ames. ASSESSMENTS: This development was previously assessed in its entirety for trunk area sanitary sewer. No other assessments have been levied, deferred or are presently pending regarding the development of this property. However, it is anticipated that the public hearing for the upgrading of Wescott Road will be held by June of 1987 resulting in a pending assessment against this development. In addition to those anticipated pending assessments, additional assessment obligations are identified as follows: ITEM QUANTITY Trunk Area Water 62.12 Ac Trunk Area Storm Sewer 2,751,000 sf RATE $1,250/Ac $0.053/sf TOTAL ................................. AMOUNT $ 77,650 .$145,803 $223,453 All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the final quantities contained in the final plat providing credit for the appropriate ponding easements and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. CONDITIONS: WOODLANDS ADDITION 1. The upgrading of Wescott Road and the trunk area storm sewer system servicing this development must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. 2. In addition to the required common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate all ponding and utility alignment easements as required by the final design approved by staff prior to or as a part of final plat approval. 3. A temporary cul-de-sac shall be constructed at all stub streets at the boundaries of this development. 4. The two parallel cul-de-sacs in the southeastern portion of the development shall be eliminated through their interconnection. 5. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan showing buildable house elevations for each lot must be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval. 6. A11 cul-de-sacs shall be. eliminated that cannot provide feasible building sites without extensive grading and/or retaining wall requirements. 7. An 8" water main shall traverse through this plat for future extension to the north. 8. Sanitary sewer laterals shall be stubbed to the adjacent property on the northwest and southeast portions of this plat for future extensions and service. 9. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the time frame requirements of the affected. agencies. 10. All cul-de-sacs with center islands shall have a, minimum right- of-way radius of 65'. A 50' half right-of-way for Wescott Road shall be dedicated. A minimum 60' right-of-way for all internal through streets must be dedicated: 11. Sanitary sewer to service this development from Wescott Road shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 12. Water main looping between cul-de-sacs shall be provided as required by City staff. 13. All standard platting conditions shall be,adhered to. 14. A variance shall be granted for the 2 cul-de-sacs in excess of 500'. 15. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. Zl� m 2-15 D-111 D D -i P/E 2-15 •r •' 11.1• '��_ '•\ •�1L'!1 `�L:Y•r flfy , � r �. X1:1 .' .t i'•'� 'i,f'y... '•i / � f f't • %� . y ?til �..�' .'•;, � >t cn - I Alt� I' Cil'' � �-'•'� ]�`; . •. `''•4' ;....._.:.. �. cn ..J ca 03 TRI -LAND INC ��y�` ..-.. r `� •�'�-�� PLANNER! [NOMRRyT'1t }1 TTW f)L"1DOW - . IF M 9 DAK. CO. MON. NW CORNER OF THE i N 112 OF THE SW 114 1-4 �/ aS ! :�. ? i� I :off �4 / � •• I •v � Fv 185 r Fri -I -1 Z OOOZZ- O"v •"i O� �,a.� 'f, ry �\ f�j/ cL Y --Z .�. gZ I CI N( r wt NO r N F •k „3� tF `�•�! 1 �q ® N I I Gln Cc, un 0 pt d -ROAD L*m 2-6-8: i-15-8; t11`I1J txJH i Itl iLwhlhlrlKY f'LAf p: ROBERT ENGSPROM I Drawn LOCATOR I _ �%� �% ASSOCIATES INC. H3 < �. _. `��� _ Ste•. . . _ _f����- • .•._.._ 1'[ • .\� �._'._ ,- .f^ I - / • �-tom-`+ +•[ �..:I `' '.�/..___ in 33 Cl 91 SEeTT 1 , I � � 1) \ • i-- - mei✓ • - , 1 ---�`v'; ` `iC ,_`� `y .111 ' �. N . _�•;;%C� / >' /' : a _�� �. •�.1J •ti ,A f. �,+. � i. r \ I _ I1 .� � � ,� ; �� jCr • , i � ` ` - \ ~ j y •.�.\ /�� 1 •%!moi ' ,c' .: ' L,u fl , � r' `� >r � 1'�� � �{ rel 1 � •• • t � • 1 IS' . - t w•..r r �C—,/ -���� �_s..— I '•••VVV; f Jed-�� • •—• y ``t{�,�[� 1 _ . — t:. J'.i+ . qk 1- "fit^_ ��f ij�TfV+�w: ••�i•. ` �•'��' _ ���J_ � ,/'�1N^ ' *, IF - _ _ � .,� `� p • � �` •' 'l :C / r \ ,� `�'•, -- . ice` �� �`, i % N. it _`-f Y `�/`'�j` `� 1 -•'•1— _ _— � y \ � ,� ,'_h � `�' 1 1 1,1. 11 ; 111 1 \ ++ JJ f�� ,I ••�'. �� `• t 1 Ita .11 1 ;1_I 1 '\1�• ,� � r t �{T ��=���tl�•_' iz n IQ—i �>••� St ! F.J. 19 l2'•* `, GP -8 pb ~�i�c''���" iv l I i 48ll�..ti` r•-� p.:�';: 877.3 <i JEP-3 E -b 0; 886.0 838.3 / 876.3 i I i - �• �L;� ;;�..,t:k;^. ,i:� 855.41 877.2 ! L�_..-GP �'1 Nes _.� I Yc�� G` 8 5 r- -' - > `' ( �• D -s J'CO. RD?B i 42" :E...d 1 `NE�F Fr-�{ 11f - 85 3 Tro-DP, 10 • 848.0 DP -9 D -r TO $60.0 858.3 WSCOTIT `m°�J HILLS I �ti/ li 862.8_ ...- -- DP_ -I I ✓ �I I r ess.o _ GP -9 882.2 D lw' WESCOTT ,yo / ` __ 879.3 �"'' 8856.0 68.0 8_4 CARRIAGE-� / R ! � 12.. �+• GOLF I E -h IP 14 PLACE I D''�1g S E GARDEN ( LEI$S.0 873.0 -- -854.15 JP -16 JP -17 ,KS.TF N 882.0/ 874.7 858.0' a�P�'2 a __ I 8 p1 o 1 R X92 4 I ! I �t��t � �J P• 8 9882:_� � � • 1183 2.0 879. / 871.0 _.. --- ` :854. 1- I# 687.0 ^:.gggp;::.::. � , "'• (I1 •�� t ~8t3d.0�E_ ,.-42 f6�F9:+::•:•:•::. WESCOTT �_ ; 9� JP -627 8973 887.1 �~ 2 ,- STATION 8640 i � 888. / •' s ) �. 89551 "' ...••rti•'� _ JP -18= B 2.0 = ` � J1-46 :•/ • .Iliar. � x '892.3 :•k ; ;:T�' J 87/ 0 - Iw 0 JP-63��:;:.�::•:':•.,• a- vl� s`a Lv g99.T3� 885.7 •:j•,' :j� !s1 ADC o 888. / c 876.3 `4 f' : aJ�i 5:'� ::_:.-.:'i' GP / 883. ! 890.7 / =I �'•• J� Tj?1 . ;..• Ic 887.4 { ' --- 89hl 0TT RUAD/ - C�7y{--•-�it t�:• 4r"� = - - - - -Ll�� ;...-- J_ - _- _.- :• , F i :�"I^ fTCILI.I J87758� 882 3D -,..... -- ---_ - _ 0 1 r_ J I _x r _ r IaLrLrT�' / l J- r- K+wcLpN BJP -30 R p JP -55 8822 /` 11JP- /010 �ADD. - _ �, 879.4 �"� �J �y� �V • 864 1^ SOV ARE F� 852.0 85.4 855.6 J-0 4' irTTi. d� LJP-2 1.S.-17 I / �� 815 3 I ^�/ �3 J P- 2 3 _ 840.0 ae ♦\tea ,` I �� 8574 ___ _..... 0 j 2 IN X36 V N IT v - W �� = -� \ J IJ J843. J .. , ---Jjp 849. � 27" IRK r S •/ z \��• JP -3'4 -25 J -a JP -'53 JP -22 i 817.0 1 -q 884.0 86 0 820.7 i 824.0 89/.91 _ qo: 9- 88 .4 \ 840.0 - otj _ JP -29 ,N 945.0' I JP �27r - P=28 896.0':. 806.0, i or, I 904.0' 24.0- s ' 1 a _ 9. SUBJECT PARCEL THE WOODLANDS • - _. - ---�-==-- -- --- FIG. + 1 City Of eagan approved : Standard PUBLIC STORM SEWER plate #: WORKS N DEPARTMENI MASTER PLAN m 6-2� iN� �� ; � 3 � • Q�,S 12!° i i ICO nHFR LAGn� �- � " N - E E ' .12 �. r� T I N s\ 0 lUhfAFly� I��T� .� / 9 \ \ X ADDITION ESCOTT CARRIAGE fff�� ... / ° N Z LLS ,. HILLS �` :: F tiC \ $fir— — GARDEN LOTS 'RAILS 10 0 ::.12 WN ..:: ........ S r {vcc LTi P06n , IZ �r ,; �•7 S r DO C -PP Z C-H�- 65 __ f2 24 12 C— loe 040. 112 je --- --� C -II 54 1 12 _H �n ( ��4UDITOWS SUBO. NO.4 I 1 W 1� � C F SUBJECT PARCEL THEL WOODLANDS FIG.. #2 city of eagan SANITARY approved : standard PUBLIC SEWER plate #: $ - WORKS MASTER PLAN zZZ N DEPARTMENTI F 18" �12" z �/1 C 61.5/80.0 181'. R' M ?R 18" �. ` 7 J TOt�,4R 3.6/ 2.0 e �.� ADDITION r -- CARRIAGE HILLS GOLF COURSE 8" �CKW00D RAILS IID 43.3/60. �r�r�rr�ss�u 118"} Lw 0 50.3/67.Q 1a�IT ._ IL.._T._ i fry I}1 � I{. i _ �� � • .-, 1 � �!/ �,, , �; J , ��l�X��,�v, I 1 I 85 51.4172.0 \ yr'�" .�,,• / r'-- - # _ tet•: (� 1,11 LbREN 20°. $" 1 8" IJ HILLS 6/66.0 7.5/43.0 24" 62 24'' WESCOTT 10 M.G. QRH.W. STORAGE � / H.W.L. 1059 -7 f i6" GARIbEN� LOTS / f 113 56. ........:::.: r--wv;� .5 6.4/ 76.0 elZ1 . - + 60 InUU5TRfAU,I PARK ; 48.9/66. 112 50.4/67.0 ,.' LbREN j 114 38.4/56.0 dQ PLACE 16" K5"TA _ 53 SA R x 63A L i 19 54.6/71.0 (&53.2/71.0 A FI � 118 53.1/68.0 saw Z s= <n. 411111111111111�� 50.3/670 I6" 4 �� " �— I WE5' PUBLIS"!N o f 117 53.7/ 7.0 V�� Ist ADO city of eagan PUBLIC $ WORKS n DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL THE WOODLANDS WATER MASTER PLAN z23 - t FIG. #3 approved L standard plate #: -- FS AI),/ �.�� 12"1 j/�/// :•::: �'. i .wr•wF �•� ` i ISS - _ - -� I 112 50.4/67.0 ,.' j 114 38.4/56.0 dQ 16" 53 mom i 19 54.6/71.0 16 FI � 118 53.1/68.0 saw Z s= <n. 411111111111111�� 50.3/670 I6" 4 �� " �— I f 117 53.7/ 7.0 V�� M L78 51.4/65.0 ^— 18.4/29.0 _._-2CO 180 �� 1116 66.7/85.0 .. 6 M.G. ...--� �._.. I$I GROUND STORAGE 5000 G.P.M. BOOSTER H.W. L. 1059 \ 12" i 186 42.2/58.0 I I 182. 68.0/ 24" WI' �.. 6 0/720: 72rOn 20" ai A" I 1020 ' . 187139 54.g 237 I 12" 184 68.7/ 74.0 (1857 - ! as,>/QKA IA8 ,�M e eiIRD. N0. 42 —� city of eagan PUBLIC $ WORKS n DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL THE WOODLANDS WATER MASTER PLAN z23 - t FIG. #3 approved L standard plate #: -- MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION W DATE: MARCH 10, 1987 RE: WOODLANDS ADDITION — PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION ACTION The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, on March 5th, reviewed the proposed Woodlands Addition. After review of the proposed preliminary plat the Advisory Commission made the following recommendations: 1. A cash dedication requirement. 2. A sidewalk on Wescott Road. 3. This development be responsible for providing and installing a bituminous trailway, connecting the Woodlands Addition to the Sunrise Addition, and hence the proposed school/park site. KV/bls cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works 7z� APC Minutes February 26, 1987 9. This development shall be responsible for the upgrading of trunk related assessments associated with the rezoning and any additional trunk areas, lateral benefit or front footage assessments previously not levied and/or associated with the future upgrading of County Road. 30. 10. This development shall extend a sanitary sewer lateral to the west property line for future extension and service to the undeveloped property to the west. 11. This development shall be subject to all conditions and restrictions of Dakota County regarding its proposed street access and platting adjacent to County right-of-way. 12. A ponding easement shall be dedicated incorporating the 887.0 elevation around Heine Pond. 13. The required conservation easement for the side hill on the west side of Heine Pond shall be properly conveyed and recorded simultaneously with the final plat. 14. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 15. A 10 foot setback variance to 20 feet shall be granted for Unit 60. 16. A copy of the homeowners association's by-laws shall be reviewed by the City Attorney. 17. The park land dedication shall be fulfilled in accordance with the PD Agreement and the Advisory Park and Recreation Commission recommendations. 18. A financial guarantee for the landscaping shall not be released until after one year from the installation date. All voted yea. The commission complimented the developer on coming back with a much more improved proposal. WOODLANDS ADDITION - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing called by Mr. Harrison was upon the application of Robert Engstrom Associates for rezoning of 73.2 Agricultural acres to R-1 Single Family and a preliminary plat consisting of 125 lots located in the southeast quarter of Section 14. Mr. Runkle indicated that the Comprehensive Guide Amendment was not necessary and that the developer had been working with the developer of property directly to the west to provide a good, larger than required single family development, which resulted in swaps of land to facilitate 'curvilinear streets and minimum destruction of natural vegetation and topography. All lots exceed R-1 requirements with an average of 20,000 square feet. 2z5 N APC Minutes February 26, 1987 Mr. Engstrom was present who indicated that his development of Chatterton Ponds had shown that there was a market in the City for homes pricing in the $195,000.00 to $350,000.00 price range. Mr. Fred Hohenstein was present and asked what had occurred with the trailway system from the South Hills development. It appears that this system, if it existed, had not yet been developed and would be reviewed by the Park Department. Mr. Colbert also advised the public that the pond level would not increase or decrease as it would not be a part of the storm sewer system, as proposed with this development. Neighboring owners, Wendell Windstrom and Ed Dundmound requested information regarding assessments for the installation of new trunk utility lines. Mr. Colbert explained the utility construction and assessment process. Ms. Rosemary White of South Hills appeared and expressed concern in regard to removal of trees in the front of the homesites. Mr. Jeff Donler, a representative of the Herman Mueller estate, expressed his opinion that the developer was acting in the best interest of the estate in conserving the value of the land. Mr. Voracek expressed concern in regard to the smaller size lots along the western portion of the proposal, presently being tilled and lacking trees. Mr. Colbert commented on potential problems with building pads being' too small and having to fill hillsides which the developer said would be addressed before the final grading and drainage plan was completed. Discussion then centered around the issue of excessively long cul-de-sacs and the possibility of making such concessions in order to promote more executive type housing. In response to questions, the developer agreed that a trailway should be provided to a school site. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning from Agricultural to R-1 Single Family. All voted in favor. Gustafson moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The upgrading of Wescott Road and the trunk area storm sewer system servicing this development must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. 2. In addition to the required common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate all ponding and utility alignment easements as required by the final design approved by staff prior to or as a part of final plat approval. 3. A temporary cul-de-sac shall be constructed at all stub streets at the boundaries of this development. 4. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan showing buildable house elevations for each lot must be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval. 5. All cul-de-sacs shall be eliminated that cannot provide feasible building sites without extensive grading and/or retaining wall requirements. 7 APC Minutes February 26, 1987 6. An 8 foot water main shall traverse through this plat for future extension to the north. 7. Sanitary sewer laterals shall be stubbed to the adjacent property on the northwest and southeast portions of this plat for future extensions and service. 8. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the time frame requirements of the affected agencies. 9. All cul-de-sacs with center islands shall have a minimum right-of-way radius of 65 feet. A 50 foot half right-of-way for Wescott Road shall be dedicated. A minimum 60 foot right-of-way for all internal through streets must be dedicated. 10. Sanitary sewer to service this development from Wescott Road shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 11. Water main looping between cul-de-sacs shall be provided as required by City staff. 12. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 13. A variance shall be granted for the two cul-de-sacs in excess of 500 feet. 14. The plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee and trailway requirements. All voted yes. The Commission also directed the Park Commission to study the trailway system from South Hills. SUNRISE ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The final public hearing of the evening was called by Mr. Harrison in regard to the application of Tri -Land Properties for rezoning of 36 acres from Agricultural to R-1 Single Family and preliminary plat consisting of 70 single family lots located north of Wescott Road in the southeast quarter of Section 14. City Planner Runkle introduced the application which coincided with the application of Robert Engstrom & Associates for Woodlands Addition. Mr. Swenson was present to answer questions on behalf of the developer. There were questions raised by the public in regard to the size of the lots and the price of the proposed units. In response, Mr. Swenson indicated the lots were somewhat smaller and that the homes would not be as expensive as the Woodlands Addition to the east, ranging from $115,000.00 and up. It was indicated that again, there was not a final grading plan and therefore staff could not address the issue in total. Mr. Voracek indicated that the proposal was inconsistent with the Woodlands development, and would like to see an effort to create larger lots in excess of 85 feet in width. Mr. Swenson indicated that the narrow lots were located on cul-de-sacs and adjacent to a pipeline. az 7 E3 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT/SUNRISE ADDITION J. Rezoning from A to R-1 and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 70 Lots on 36 Acres Entitled Sunrise Addition --A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting, held on February 26, 1987, to consider two applications, one for the Rezoning of 36 acres to R-1 from Agricultural, and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 70 lots entitled Sunrise Addition. The APC is recommending approval. For a copy of the planning and engineering department reports refer to pages ZZ through 2� For a copy of the APRC recommendations refer to page Z3 For a copy of the APC action on this item refer to pages Z_ through ZV14 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS Rezoning from. A to R-1 and 2) the Addition. zZ� ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the Preliminary Plat entitled Sunrise CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT (SUNRISE ADD.) APPLICANT: TRI -LAND PROPERTIES LOCATION: SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRIGULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 26, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 17, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATIONS: Two separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of 36 (Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (single family) district and a preliminary plat consisting of 70 lots located north of Wescott Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 14. This plat is consistent with both the existing Land Use Plan and the recently adopted plan. EXISTING CONDITIONS: An elementary school site, an unplatted agricultural parcel and Carriage Hills Golf Course are to the west and south of this plat. The Wescott Garden lots are to the north and another single family proposal, the Woodlands abuts to the east. It should be noted that the developers of the Woodlands and this project combined efforts to create an overall layout compatible with the physical constraints of the area. This site is characterized by steep slopes, numerous knolls and depressions with storage capabilities. Most vegetation would be considered 'savanna' in the broad habitat classification. This includes 5 - 50% tree crown cover, grassland with scattered trees and forest - prairie transitions (irregular groves of forest intermixed with grasslands or farmsteads). The extreme NW, portion of the site is heavily wooded. The 100' wide Williams Pipeline easement crosses this project in a northeasterly manner in the northern 1/3 of the site. SITE PLAN: The primary access for this plat is through north/south Sunrise Way. North of the school site it splits forming a cul-de- sac that backs up to a large ponding area along the western property line. The cul-de-sac is nearly centered over this easement and should service this otherwise tough to develop corner quite well. Lots 13 and 14, Block 3, will not be able to meet the 85' width at the setback line and 50' at the curb R-1 lot criteria. All lots do meet the 12,000 S.F. requirement and most exceed with the average size being 17,220 S.F. This plat has a gross density of 1.97 units/acre and a net density of 2.4 units/acre. Sunrise Trail will provide a secondary east/west connection to the Woodlands project. Another east/west connection point has been provided along the northern portion of Lot 7, Block 1 in case direct access to the school site becomes necessary. The property line between Lots 17 and 18, Block 3, will need to be shifted to the east so the existing home can meet setback requirements. 2Z7 UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient, size, capacity and depth will be provided by the trunk extension along Wescott Road proposed for 1987. Because this plat is contingent upon this trunk extension, it must be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. The application material submitted indicated that this development would receive the majority of its sanitary sewer service through the Woodlands Addition. Based on minimum elevations available from the extension of the trunk sewer in Wescott Road, the applicant's proposal is not feasible. Subsequently, it must be revised to have all sanitary sewer from the Sunrise Addition conveyed directly to the trunk in Wescott Road. This will also eliminate the coordination requirements with the Woodlands Addition. The internal sanitary sewer lateral must be. installed to the north boundary of the plat in the northwest corner for future extension and service of approximately 23 acres of the adjacent unplatted property. In addition, a sanitary sewer lateral should be stubbed to the west line in the extreme northwest corner for future extension and service by potential development of the golf course. Water service for this development of adequate pressure and capacity will be provided by the proposed trunk water main to be constructed within Wescott Road during 1987. Because this construction has not yet been authorized, this development cannot proceed until Council has authorized its installation. This development shall interconnect its internal water main lateral with the stub from the Woodlands Addition on the east. Also, the water main shall be stubbed to the extreme northwest corner for future extension with the development of the adjacent unplatted property and golf course. An 8" water main shall connect at the future trunk on Wescott Road and extend through this plat to the extreme northwest corner for future extension and connection to the future 16" Duckwood Drive trunk line. GRADING/ DRAINAGE: The grading plan submitted with this application is incomplete and not compatible with the proposed development scheme in several locations. With the need to perpetuate and maximize the storage capacity of Pond JP-60 in the extreme northern corner of this development, it will be necessary to eliminate the two proposed building sites. Also, in the northwest corner of the proposed development, no fill or encroachment into Pond JP-41 will be allowed. Maximum storm water storage volume requirements must be maintained. Also, this application did not provide for any internal storm sewer lateral system necessary to handle surface water runoff. Because of these significant oversights and omissions, a detailed review is difficult and only generalized comments can be provided for consideration of this approval. The City is currently reviewing its Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan to determine possible revisions that would affect the number, location and elevations of requiied storm water drainage basins Za within and adjacent to this subdivision and the proposed Woodlands development to the east. After completion of the City's review, a a detailed grading and .drainage plan compatible with any final revision must be submitted and approved to ensure that adequate storage volumes are being provided. The general outlet for this drainage district is the existing trunk storm sewer in Wescott Road near the Lexington Square development which provides a positive outlet to the Minnesota River. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this development would be provided by way of Wescott Road which currently exists as a rural ditch gravel road section. It is anticipated that Wescott Road will be upgraded to its ultimate four -lane, tiro-trailway design during 1987. However, this improvement must be authorized by Council action prior to this development's final approval to ensure adequate access. To provide adequate continuity, a street connection is being provided to the proposed stub street from the Woodlands Addition on the east. This development is proposing to stub the street to the northwest corner for future extension and connection to Wescott Hills Drive adjacent to the Carriage Hills Golf Course. However, there exists approximately 300' of private property between this development and the public right-of-way for Wescott Hills Drive which eliminates the potential for interconnection and ultimate access to Yankee Doodle Road. Subsequently, a temporary cul-de-sac will have to be constructed in the extreme northwest corner. Also, in this same area, public right-of-way should be dedicated for future street and utility extensions to the west when the golf course develops. Also, the final alignment of Wescott Hills Drive through this plat should be realigned to provide for a more free flowing movement to Wescott Road with the stub street from the Woodlands Addition on the east creating more of a "T" intersection rather than.the- proposed "Y" configuration. If the Woodlands Addition development does not proceed, this development should construct a temporary cul-de-sac on its eastern boundary of the proposed stub street. EASEMEIITS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERViITS: A 50' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Wescott Road. All internal streets shall have a minimum 60' right-of-way with cul-de-sac diameters at 110'. Based on the final revisions to the Comprehensive Storm Sewer ponding requirements, adequate ponding easements must be dedicated to incorporate the anticipated high water elevations. This may impact the buildable area of several proposed,lots. Additional common side and rear lot utility easements will be necessary based on whatever final internal storm sewer lateral system design is required with the final configuration. In addition to all regulatory agency permit requirements for the installation and extension of utilities, a permit must be obtained from the Williams Brothers Pipeline Company for grading and street/utility construction within their easement. Based on anticipated design constraints by Williams Brothers, that permit must be obtained prior to final detail design and plat approval. Depending upon the final approved detailed grading plan, additional slope/fill easements may be required from the adjacent unplatted property. Additional slope easements will also be required from the property to the east if the Woodlands Addition does not proceed. ASSESSMENTS: The entire parcel to be incorporated within this development has previously been assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer. No trunk area water or storm sewer assessments have been levied nor are they presently pending. However, with the anticpated trunk storm sewer improvements necessary to.service this development and the adjacent Woodlands Addition, trunk area storm sewer would.be levied under a future City project if not included as a condition of approval. Street assessments for the upgrading of Wescott Road would be identified as a part of that public hearing process anticipated within the next several months. If these public improvement projects do not proceed, the following is a list of all related trunk area assessment obligations of this development in addition to the internal streets and utilities. ITEM QUANTITY Trunk Area Water 30 Ac Trunk Area Storm Sewer 1,306,800 sf Wescott Rd. Street Improvement 284 ft. Wescott Rd. Lateral Storm Sewer 284 ft. RATE AMOUNT PROJECT # $1,250/Ac $37,500 494 $0.053/sf $69,260 494 $17.72/lf $ 5,032 494 $10.39/lf $ 2,951 494 TOTAL ................................ $114,743 All final assessment rates shall be those in effect at the time of final plat approval based on final plat area and frontage calculations. CONDITIONS: SUNRISE ADDITION 1. The upgrading of Wescott Road must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. 2. The installation and extension of trunk sanitary sewer and water main within Wescott Road must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. 3. The internal sanitary sewer collection system shall drain to its ultimate connection at Wescott Road and also provide extensions to the adjacent unplatted property and golf course in the extreme northwest corner. 4. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be submitted and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 5. This development shall dedicate the required storm water ponding easements in accordance with the revised Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan necessary to provide the required storage volumes. 6. In addition to the common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate appropriate easements as dictated by the final alignment and depth of all utilities constructed outside of dedicated street right-of-way. 7. Public street right-of-way shall be provided for future extension into the golf course property at the extreme northwest corner. g. A temporary cul-de-sac shall be constructed at the end of all stub streets that do not provide for immediate extension to other existing or scheduled streets. 9. An S" diameter internal water main shall connect at Wescott Road and provide for future connection to the Duckwood Drive. trunk water main near the northwest corner. 10. Wescott mills Drive final alignment should provide for a free flowing traffic movement from the northwest corner to Wescott Road with the stub street to the proposed Woodlands Addition intersecting at a "T" configuration. 11. This development shall be responsible for all additional assessment obligations associated with the development of this plat at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 12. This development shall obtain all regulatory agency permits necessary within the time frame required by the affected agency. In addition, a permit to work within the Williams Brothers easement must be obtained prior to final plat approval. 7,33 13. This development shall provide the appropriate easements and construction of a trailway providing access to the proposed elementary school from the Woodlands Addition on the east in a location as approved by the Parks Department. 14. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 15. The existing home on Lot 18, Block 3, shall meet setback requirements. Z3 4 �K: TRI -LAND INC - FLOWERS SWVC T ORS ODLAND. rcw:3rr 930:--7 vow — PP 2,3r,a - saw] i^C t L,:--1 W r- &-1 a w .7 „ of v--1 SUNRISE PILLS TRI - LAND INC. x 8 ....... i� ....,. �.,.�. PLANNERS ENGINEERS S ^ PRELIM/NARY GRADE M 4 +P.gLAA/w/SURVEYORS li !' 1iL l %� / M9S U.00.t �.O A.8-6 ■a N_ -Y w•`f N.0 m i^C t L,:--1 W r- &-1 a w .7 „ of v--1 TRI -LAND INC r '� s$ x SVNR/9E H/LLS:. ptanHERS Et+aiHEERs { Q 3 o. PELIMINARY UT-mrry PLAN R SURVEYORS Mcmx a ..� r �.ar o , - , LL n < i::�7Z3 �� ws� 11� \ 1:11 )! - I �:.: r�� LATTE0 y Lj tj 10 14 Pq •J � 'R Ct CE Fr LZ- • rrr r= • err �. I ; .1 'x 71 TRI -LAND INC. rrr ...r..1� r.1 N 1 r ■ .r/ � SCJNR/3E H/LLS ■.r.+..... �....� r.. Ir n s ;Q o= '�'""""r"'•" PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 9.i� o` PR---L/J-1/NARY PLAT��C} ..r... ,•�„�,� ■.■.•.�.. "M MCC" NO" PECLc-*1VcD FEB z, In, ID 838: 855-41 � 12" -s TC I DP -7; % DO. 12 IEP -38 7 - 3 877.2 RD /24 -- QP 1 ii 8Z.6 DP -9 H860.0 85;.3 ,� t-- 862.8 0.) CARRIAGE Fk� HILLS GOLF rTrfUjg S E vo, r E�- 1 -D HE-7-�d T-1 NE. .OTT Ito E -h 'ARDEN P 14 .0 -85401 JP -16 3 i832.'O P-59 854. 874.7 879.1 JP -63V 88 �\\N' 899 7 88537 P - 3 7 885.7 2 JP -31 888.1 876.3 Y 880.4 890.7• -Q895.7 Ad INt ESI:JTT; R) AQ./ -M I J -m V Co T JP -58 877.5 I T] 8822 ON 16-1 JP -30 -ddb -.4 6`53 0, jpla - 874.0 882.0 i. 886.0 o 4Q.: GP 5 8 84 0 8, bu 8513 G P�.6� 866.0 GP -9 8 856.0 866.0 LbREI�PLACE JP.�.17 01 S A R W-6-31?, F- 87ZO slo: G7C SCOTT \9,,STATI01 p�7. BA4.0 jp 18 672.0 8 O 871.0 14 Li 1-0 A ... 883 8874 J -P JO -55 873.0 879.4 88561 5' JP -20 ---J,P- 64 -/ /I -N/ SQUARE 8 5 2.0), ---1751:41 /4x / z 855.6 8 -0 .1 �'/x Al L.S.-17 J8 523 J -w 815.3 JP -23 z 840.0 852.2 24; 8574 k, jp-2'�� N 3THv; W cu 843.3 849 ' K r, Ip Pip -34 � J-5 JP -25 884.0 jp-:53 JP -22 817.0 8644.0 820.7 110. 824.0 1 891.9! 88..4 840.0..._. -0uj- Zi (S JP -29 i! L.S.-181 (L 926.0 945.0 --JP -2 71 P-26 1896.0; 806.01 01, .904. 24.0z N Q. n �7TTTTI -7-,T-F7 f Tf f I city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS .0 C4 DEPARTME In SUBJECT PARCEL SUNRISE ADD. FIG. standard STORM SEWER approved. plate #: MASTER TPAN 71 Et N -u ,, V 12 i I I 1-- AID N- J J Cp N - E E III S `/ X. ADDITION WE5C0TT ' 19 CARRIAGE !� � \ N -Z r.� HILLS 1 - \ \\,•L ,E4p rQLF GARDEN LOTS 000 12 11 Al _ V \ KWDOD I 1 \ 95 `;`' S A R r.,; A... �` � i � `� •'fir. h� 12... d _ _ � �, �-- _ r--. :..::: ::�_T iyr- " v �►� REE;_:::,..' IN B13 IN" ITT Pj;611WO 112 K X63 —T- C -PP 1112 �I C-JJV ;�s 4� I C -HH / • 12��"� ` 12.. 1 56� ` C -II 54 9,�2' 1 `� 12 �► I =SUBJECT PARCEL SUNRISE ADD. city of eagan SANITARY SEWER 0PUBLIC $ WORKS MASTER PLAN N DEPARTMENT] FIG.. +2 approved: standard plate ##: I d5 51.4/72.0 61.5/80.0 n � '18M a ■11 � � ! 676/86.0 149.6/66.0 5/43.0 «28 19" 20",' ----------` - — 6'4 63 24■ 62 ,2"4� 'GbPIdEp f�t:Ai9 t .66. „ 24' IPI�STRIAL•,� Fly RT7, 8 L_� HILLS PARK T1R 3.6/ 2,0 I. ___ . --��— 17.1/32. 61 48.9/66Q - 10 M. G. ADDITION CARRIAGE WE COTT- ROUND M.G.STORAGE 18" - H.W.L. 1059 HILLS GOLF GARbEN 16 OR COURSE LOTS 'LACE KWOOD('Fp TAILS 43.3/60.0 ----� 5 a a x63A 110 - ' 16" / �J m am 113 9 g 240 a 58. }+ 53.2/71.0 ••r f i •S•• �•� a i Tall I!� -il ------------ n.�1 jr ••,•w''^N "ter __—• W;i III / O X.:. 5 0.3rI = Dior r''':; WEST pv8l_1SI+In p QI Ist ADO IW i4p Frsr�7T1' wOAn/j i2" /rf.":.; (`�'�}'7 ,�-';1 ,_ _•T_ 1!2 50.4/67.0 1 X114 38.4/56.0 161 i `53. /71 am 119 54.6/71.0 118 53.1/68.0 50.3/67.0 _ +wm4b 4m� doom m� ■Iaw ( r --•U , ` �1 17 53.7/ 7,2.0 ` 2T.,`Y 1 51.4 / 65.0 1 a� 178 `2" -�—* ..18.4/29.0 2Qn 116 66.7/ 85.01 C -cam 19.1 -31.- 6 M.G. GROUND STORA,E r 5000 G.P.M. BOOSTER `12n I .-...._-. 1;81 H.W.L. 1059 1 __.1.02 lag 183 24„ �I;---L .�---1 186 42.2/58.0 W 1 �) 68.0/ of A2O- 18 —. ---90.'7;'0 72:0 20„ a -. n � I 187 39.0/54. _1... _ 54 237 iJ ' 12" ; 184 68.7/74.0 - 185 i - 85.2/95.0 city of eagan MPUBLICoWORKS 101 Cm DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL SUNRISE ADD. WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. *3 approved standard plate #: — MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: ffid VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION �O DATE: MARCH 10, 1987 RE: SUNRISE ADDITION — ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ACTION At the regular meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission on March 5th, the Commission reviewed the proposed Sunrise Addition. City staff noted the proposed land swap between this development and the proposed school/park site immediately adjacent and to the west. After review and discussion by the Advisory Commission, the Advisory Commission recommended the ' following: 1. A cash dedication requirement. 2. A sidewalk on Wescott Road. 3. A bituminous trail on the west side of the plat, connecting to the school/park site. Further, the recommendation of the Advisory Commission for the City to implement the proposed land swap with the developer. KV/bls cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Paul Hauge, City Attorney Z� APC Minutes February 26, 1987 6. An 8 foot water main shall traverse through this plat for future extension to the north. 7. Sanitary sewer laterals shall be stubbed to the adjacent property on the northwest and southeast portions of this plat for future extensions and service. 8. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the time frame requirements of the affected agencies. 9. All cul-de-sacs with center islands shall have a minimum right-of-way radius of 65 feet. A 50 foot half right-of-way for Wescott Road shall be dedicated. A minimum 60 foot right-of-way for all internal through streets must be dedicated. 10. Sanitary sewer to service this development from Wescott Road shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 11. Water main looping between cul-de-sacs shall be provided as required by City staff. 12. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 13. A variance shall be granted for the two cul-de-sacs in excess of 500 feet. 14. The plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee and trailway requirements. All voted yes. The Commission also directed the Park Commission to study the trailway system from South Hills. SUNRISE ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The final public hearing of the evening was called by Mr. Harrison in regard to the application of Tri -Land Properties for rezoning of 36 acres from Agricultural to R-1 Single Family and preliminary plat consisting of 70 single family lots located north of Wescott Road in the southeast quarter of Section 14. City Planner Runkle introduced the application which coincided with the application of Robert Engstrom & Associates for Woodlands Addition. Mr. Swenson was present to answer questions on behalf of the developer. There were questions raised by the public in regard to the size of the lots and the price of the proposed units. In response, Mr. Swenson indicated the lots were somewhat smaller and that the homes would not be as expensive as the Woodlands Addition to the east, ranging from $115,000.00 and up. It was indicated that again, there was not a final grading plan and therefore staff could not address the issue in total. Mr. Voracek indicated that the proposal was inconsistent with the Woodlands development, and would like to see an effort to create larger lots in excess of 85 feet in width. Mr. Swenson indicated that the narrow lots were located on cul-de-sacs and adjacent to a pipeline. V* H APC Minutes February 26, 1987 Voracek moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to postpone the applications for 30 days until the next Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Swenson indicated that a delay would not only delay the Sunrise project, but may result in the delay to Woodlands project, which was involved in swapping properties to create more desirable lots and street designations. Two voted yes and two voted no, and the motion died. Trygg moved and Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 Single Family. Trygg, Gustafson and Harrison voted in favor; 'Krisnik and Voracek voted against. Trygg moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The upgrading of Wescott Road must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. 2. The installation and extension of trunk sanitary sewer and water main within Wescott Road must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. 3. The internal sanitary sewer collection system shall drain to its ultimate connection at Wescott Road and also provide extensions to the adjacent unplatted property and golf course in the extreme northwest corner. 4. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be submitted and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 5. This development shall dedicate the required storm water ponding easements in accordance with the revised Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan necessary to provide the required storage volumes. 6. In addition to the common lot line drainage and utility easements, this development shall dedicate appropriate easements as dictated by the final alignment and depth of all utilities constructed outside of dedicated street right-of-way. 7. Public street right-of-way shall be provided for future extension into the golf course property at the extreme northwest corner. 8. A temporary cul-de-sac shall be constructed at the end of all stub streets that do not provide for immediate extension to other existing or scheduled streets. 9. An 8 inch diameter internal water main shall connect at Wescott Road and provide for future connection to the Duckwood Drive trunk water main near the northwest corner. APC Minutes February 26, 1987 10. Wescott Hills Drive final alignment should provide for a free flowing traffic movement from the northwest corner to Wescott Road with the stub street to the proposed Woodlands Addition intersecting at a "T" configuration. 11. This development shall be responsible for all additional assessment obligations associated with the development of this plat at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 12. This development shall obtain all regulatory agency permits necessary within the time frame required by the affected agency. In addition, a permit to work within the Williams Brothers easement must be obtained prior to final plat approval. 13. This development shall provide the appropriate easements and construction of a trailway providing access to the proposed elementary school from the Woodlands Addition on the east in a location as approved by the Parks Department. 14. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 15. The existing home on Lot 18, Block 3, shall meet setback requirements. Those in favor were Harrison, Trygg and Gustafson; those against were Voracek and Krisnik. ADJOURNMENT At 10:00 p.m., Gustafson moved, Krisnik seconded the motion to recommend adjournment of the meeting. All voted yes. DGK e Secretary — APC z� 10 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine PRELIMINARY PLAT/JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADDITION A. Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition Preliminary Plat Consisting of 12 Townhouse Units --The City Council denied the proposed Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition plat submitted by Good Value Homes on September 16, 1986. Good Value Homes Inc. filed an action in District Court and on February 27, 1987 a decision/order was written by District Court Judge Robert J. Goggins that specifically requires the City of Eagan to grant preliminary plat approval of Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition and on or before March 31, 1987 the City of Eagan shall submit written evidence to the court that it has complied with the aforesaid Peremptory Writ of Mandamus. Enclosed on pages __ through Z is a copy of a memo from the City Attorney and the order for Peremptory Writ of Mandamus. The report as prepared by staff for the Johnny Ca a Ridge 5th Addition plat is enclosed on pages Z�jo through for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: to proceed with either 1. an appeal, 2. act on the preliminary plat as requested by the court order or 3. attempt further negotiation with the developer to reduce the number of units as proposed. 2�, HAUGE, EIDE & YELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW WATER VIEW OFFICE TOWER. SUITE 303 1200 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123 PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN DEBRA E. SCHMIDT Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator Eagan Government Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Good Value Homes vs. City of Eagan Dear Tom: March 5, 1987 AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 456-9000 454.4224 I am enclosing an order for Peremptory Writ of Mandamus which was filed with the Clerk of District Court on March 2, 1987 concerning the Good Value Homes case. This action was commenced about November 15, 1986 with an order directing the City Council to approve the plat of Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. The Planning Commission acted on the application of Good Value Homes for twelve additional units in three four-plex buildings on August 26, 1986 and recommended denial. On September 16, 1986 the City Council denied the application generally based on the reasons that are laid out in the Memorandum of Judge Goggins on page 1. Some of the comments that I would make in respect to the order have now been entered directing the Council to approve the plat and they are as follows: 1. The August 12, 1986 Planning and Engineering Report did not cite any ordinance variations or violations in respect to the application. 2. The strongest defense that the city had were two drawings that had been given to buyers of adjoining townhouse units in the early 1980's that included wording on out lot B of Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition as follows: "association common area" and "drainage and utility easement over all of out lot B". Although the staff members felt that this was fairly strong wording, meaning that it was intended that it was association common area and that there was an easement overall of out lot B. they are simply generic terms which mean that all land outside of the confines of each four-plex building is common area and easement area. This is apparently the way Judge Goggins felt in his decision. 79f Tom Hedges March 5, 1987 Page 2 3. You will also notice that the Judge was fairly dramatic in his Memorandum stating that the city did not claim that the applicant failed to comply with its ordinances and then cited some wording from the Odell case concerning compliance in all respects to the subdivision ordinance. Although we feel that complete compliance with an ordinance still leaves discretion with the City Council and there is a good deal of other authority for it Judge Goggins was not impressed by those arguments in our brief. In any event he was not impressed by the only reasons that we could come up with which were admittedly somewhat weak. 4. We tried to argue that Orrin Thompson in originally developing the Johnny Cake Ridge area had agreed to build fewer units and approval was given only for the units that are now in existence. In fact Orrin Thompson did leave an out lot on the site and there was no planned development for the parcel or a written agreement of any kind that specified precisely the number of units to be developed in the area. The development contract in 1979 reflected 150 townhouse units which did not include the twelve Good Value Homes units. In spite of all this information being in the brief that was submitted in December, Judge Goggins appears to come down very strongly on the ordinance issue and the wording from the Odell opinion. The order has now been entered and you will note that the city is directed to act before March 31, 1987. The choices then are as follows: 1. The city could appeal the order which should be done within 30 days of March 2nd. 2. The City Council could act at its meeting on March 17th to approve the application for preliminary plat with all of the conditions that the City staff recommends being imposed upon the application. 3. There has been discussion to the effect that the number of units would be reduced to 8 rather than 12 units and possibly discussion could take place regarding this proposal. It is doubtful however if the applicant with a favorable order will be willing to reduce the number of units. Although Good Value did ask for attorneys fees and costs the court did not award them. Yours very truly, GE EIDE & KEL R, P.A. �n Paul H. Hauge PHH:ja ly enc. STATE OF MINNESOTA- DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF DAKOTA �_, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTIRCT ------------------------------- Good Value Homes, Inc., /�`�r;TYFile No. 102604 Petitioner, ORDER FOR PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDAMUS VS. City of Eagan, Respondent. The above -entitled matter duly came on for hearing before the undersigned Judge on Decmeber 4, 1986, upon the alternative writ of mandamus and Order to Show Cause issued by the Court on November 12, 1986. Richard A: Beens, Esq., appeared on behalf of Petitioner. Paul H. Hauge, Esq., appeared on behalf of Respondent. Upon the o: -al and written arguments of counsel and upon all the files, records and proceedings, the Court makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT I Good Value Homes, Inc., (Petitioner) is a Minnesota corporation engaged in the development of residential real estate. II The City of Eagan (Respondent) is a Municipal corporation located in Dakota County, Minnesota. III Petitioner is the owner of certain real estate, legally described as: -1- Z�b I "Outlot B, Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition, according to the map or plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Dakota County, Minnesota, all lying within the boundaries of Defendant, City of Eagan and subject to the provision of Chapter II of the Eagan City Code, entitled "Land Use Regulations (Zoning)". IV Under Respondent's City Code, Petitioner's property is zoned R-3 Townhouse. V During the summer of 1986, Petitioner submitted an application to Respondent requesting that said Outlot B be platted as Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. VI On August 12, 1986, the Respondent's Planning and Engineering Department issued a report on the proposed plat. Said report makes the followi-nq findings: 1. "Twelve additional units give the Outlot an overall density of 70/units/acre, well within the 6-12 range permitted in R-3 districts." 2. "These 1056 S.F. (main level) buildings will be architec- turally the same as others in the area." 3. "The applicants grading plan appears feasible and in accordance with City Codes, the grading will not signifi- cantly impact any existing drainage patterns and should not be a problem." 4. "Utilities of sufficient size, capacity and depth exist . . . to provide service to this proposed development." 5. "Staff does not see any need for any additional easements for this development." Z71 -2- 6. "No permits are required because this development only proposes on extending services and not constructing any main lines." The Petitioner has, at all times, agreed to fulfill to recommended conditions contained in said report. VII On August 26, 1986, the City of Eagan Planning Commission voted to deny Petitioner's proposed plat. In doing so, they gave no reasons relating to either platting or zoning requirements. VIII On September 16, 1986, the Eagan City Council voted to deny Petitioner's proposed plat. The resolution of the Eagan City Council is incorporated herein by reference. The City Council cited no instances of non-compliance with the zoning or platting ordinances of the City. IX The proposed plat of Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition complies in every respect with all applicable City of Eagan ordinances and state laws. No variances or permits were requested or needed. X The attached memorandum is incorporated by reference herein. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. In denying approval of the preliminary plat of Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition, the City of Eagan has acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, contrary to its own ordinances and the laws of the State of Minnesota. WHEREUPON, the Court makes the following: -3- ZSZ r%TI. nc•n 1. A peremptory writ of mandamus in due form of law shall be issued forthwith requiring the City of Eagan to grant preliminary plat approval of Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. 2. On or before the 31st day of March, 1987, the City of Eagan shall submit written evidence to the Court that it has complied with the aforesaid peremptory writ of mandamus. DATED: February 27, 1987 BY THE COURT it Robert J. Goggins, Judge First Judicial District z$3 MEMORANDUM The Court has decided mandamus is an appropriate remedy under these proceedings and that because the City of Eagan has acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner mandamus should be granted whereby the City of Eagan is directed to grant preliminary plat approval. There are ordinances enacted by the City of Eagan governing the approval of preliminary plats. The City has not indicated in any manner that Good Value Homes, Inc. is in violation of any city ordinance. The reasons cited by the City of Eagan for denial of approval of the preliminary plat are as follows: 1. The planning commission recommended denial. 2. Density of the project would increase in "Outlot B." 3. Soil conditions affect the drainage and building suitability. 4. Aesthetics. 5. No services available at this time. 6. Representations by a previous developer that this area would not be developed in this manner. The City of Eagan does not take the position that the developer in this matter failed to comply with its ordinances. It has cited the above reasons for denial of approval. Since this is the case, the Court need not interpret the terms of the ordinance. In Odell v Cite of Eagan, 348 NW2d 792 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984) the Court of Appeals stated: "The goal of review of zoning decisions of local governing bodies is to determine whether the municipality's action was reasonable." The Court goes on to define reasonableness as follows: "Reasonableness of a local municipality's zoning decision is measured by standards in the local ordinance, not state statutes." The Odell case also states: "When a subdivision ordinance specifies standards to which a proposed plat must conform, it is arbitrary as a matter of law to deny approval of a plat which complies in all respects with the subdivision ordinance." This Court is compelled to issue a writ of mandamus. The Petitioner has complied with all applicable ordinances and the denial of approval by the City of Eagan, under these facts, is artibrary and capricious. RJG 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: preliminary Plat(Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition) APPLICANT: Good Value Homes, Inc. LOCATION: Outlot B (Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Add.) NW 4 Sec 33 EXISTING ZONING: R-3 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 26 August 1986 DATE OF REPORT: 12 August 1986 REPORTED BY: planning & Engineering APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting preliminary plat approval for the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. This plat consists of 3 four-plex buildings on Outlot B of the Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition. That plat was submitted by Orrin Thompson Homes and approved in 1984. No construction has taken place on Outlot B, located south of Cliff Road and west of Ridge Cliff Drive. CODE COMPLIANCE: The total number of units in the 4th and 5th Additions will increase from 56 to 68 units. The gross area for Outlot B is 5.1 acres. Twelve additional units give the Outlot an overall density of 7.01 units/acre, well within the 6-12 range permitted in R-3 districts. The lots are 10' larger than the building itself with the remaining area being designated as an outlot-common space. The buildings are serviced by private drives and 2 additional parking spaces per 'unit are provided in front of the garages. COMMENTS: The main reason buildings were not placed here originally is due to the poor soil. The developer will have to correct the soils to ensure proper drainage and building suitability. These 1056 S.F. (main level) buildings will be architecturally the same as others in the area. The exterior will have a brick base with aluminum siding. An association for this 12 unit plat will be combined with that of the 4th Addition for better continuity. The association will maintain the grounds, remove trash on a single scheduled basis and provide snow removal. A detailed landscape plan will be a requirement of the final plat submission. The applicant will be providing an underground sprinkling system and the proposed landscaping will be similar to other units in the area. The landscape policy will require a miminum of one tree per dwelling unit. -!o JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADD APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 2 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The applicant's grading plan appears feasible and in accordance with City Codes. The grading will not significantly impact any existing drainage patterns and should not be a problem. UTILITIES: Utilities of sufficient size, capacity and depth exist within Penkwe Way and Ridge Cliffe Drive to provide service to this proposed development. Staff recommends that this development extend existing services from Block 2 and Block 3 of the 4th Addition to Block 2 of the 5th Addition. Similarly, services from Block 1 of the 4th Addition could be extended to a portion of Block 1 of the 5th Addition, and services from Block 5 of the 4th Addition could be extended to service a portion of Block 3 in the 5th Addition. This would leave only Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1, and Lots 3 and 4 of Block 3 of the 5th Addition requiring an additional service to be cut into Ridge Cliffe Drive. As long as the entire association will remain the same, staff does not see any problem in extending existing services for this proposed development. STREETS: This development is bordered by Ridge Cliffe Drive on the southeast and Penkwe Way along its north, west and southwesterly boundaries. Both streets are City residential streets built to their ultimate design sections. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition provided dedicating all necessary right-of-way and easements. Staff does not see any need for any additional easements for this development. Outlot B of the Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition contains a drainage and utility easement over all of it. This drainage and utility easement will have to be either vacated over the areas designated as the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition or completely vacated and replatted with the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. This vacation will have to occur prior to final plat approval. PERMITS: No permits are required because this development only proposes on extending services and not constructing any main lines. ASSESSMENTS: The assessment records indicate that the City has assessed all trunk area related assessments for this proposed development. zs7 JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADD APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 3 CONDITIONS: 1. This development shall use existing services for sanitary sewer and water to the newly developed lots. The only new service that will be allowed will be to provide service to Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1, and Lots 3 and 4 of Block 3. 2. The vacation of the necessary drainage and utility easements over Outlot B for the proposed Blocks 1, 2 and 3 of the 5th Addition shall occur prior to final plat approval. 3. All costs associated with completing this development shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 4. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 5. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and the financial guarantee shall not be released until after 1 year from time of installation. 6. The plat shall be subject to the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission review and dedication requiements. lu 141 5+�' 0►f19/L ILIA'IA! =--- - - --- —_ ..z s•.. ^ LC►ff NW '"f �A "/'N OI AIMNOIN 1101 ']NI SU33NION3 VNtnnSN03 „ NOS70 '3 3NAVM30 � � � • ti �_ Qi e.,a� 1 n♦on n¢x Q Q vo N nS Oil:: ;S m NN iq� �� a a in m W Q i ZZ 6 O t; SIFF UW Ny9 ~� sPwO1~ 3:W6 ! ¢ N YssS( J R ZId Z Q00 W>i W� � Ic oll �1 o m 1 ii Q —0 8 Z 0 V �• Ld GY cl `: r, 1 -� vL4 Z�j1 • 1 ,r`�/ i11 • : _J" f_ I ,. M_ An do 1,01 r z MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: BEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1986 BE: JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE - 5TH ADDITION - ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At the Advisory Commission meeting of September 4th, 1986, Assistant Planner, Jim Sturm, reviewed the proposed Johnny Cake - 5th Addition. It is explained that this is a new plat, and not a replat of an existing area. Therefore, the Advisory Commission recommended that this development be responsible for a cash dedication requirement at the final plat. BV/bls cc: Julie Dykstra, Planning Aide v Council Minutes September 16, 1986 �C Councilman Wachter -reflected on the special consideration on the north area when the planned development was originally approved and recommended reviewing the planned development agreement more carefully. Blomquist moved, Egan seconded the motion to continue consideration of the application until a concept understanding is reached with the developer for the entire parcel. All members voted yea. SEE PLAT FILE JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The application of Good Value Homes, Inc. for approval of the preliminary plat of proposed Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition came next to the Council. The plat would consist of three 4-plex buildings on Outlot B of Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition. The plat was submitted by Orrin Thompson Homes and approved in 1984 but no construction had taken place on Outlot B or on the building sites in Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition. The total number of units in the 4th and 5th Additions would increase from 56 to 68 units, with a gross area for the Outlot being 5.1 acres. Twelve additional units provides overall density of 7.01 units per acre with the area outside of the building sites being designated as Outlot common space. Mr. Runkle detailed the application and noted that there was poor soil and the developer would be required to correct the soil in order to insure proper drainage and building suitability. Mr. Runkle also explained the objections on behalf of the Advisory Planning Commission and the neighboring property owners and noted the Planning .Commission recommended denial of the application. Surrounding owners stated that they bought houses with the understanding that open space was intended for the site. John Peterson, the Vice President of Good Value Homes, Inc. was present as was its attorney, Lawrence Johnson. Mr. Peterson argued that the change did not alter the nature of the neighborhood and that the total proposal would be within ordinance requirements. He also indicated that the applicant was willing to delete one of the building sites within the complex and noted that Orrin Thompson Homes did not develop the site because Thompson determined it was not feasible to correct the soil conditions, but Good Value Homes determined it is feasible at the present time. Mayor Blomquist objected that the proposal would increase the density and it was noted that.no services or stubs were installed originally to the site because of the intention that the property would not be developed. It was further noted that no homeowners association was organized at the present time but that the developers would organize such an association. The common area outlot also encompasses the parcels between the platted lots in the 4th Addition. A proposed Resolution was submitted to the City Council covering alternates including proposed favorable and unfavorable actions by the City Council. After extended discussion, Blomquist moved, Wachter seconded the motion to deny the application based upon the reasons outlined in the Resolution attached to and made a part of these Minutes. A copy of the Resolution was given to Mr. Peterson during the course of the meeting. All members voted in favor. 2.0 12 R 86-69 SEE PLAT FILE November 6, 1986 r. +S r> LIQUOR ORDINANCE - SECTION 5.05 - AMENDMENT The City Attorney submitted the proposed amendment to Section 5.05 regarding limitation on ownership, including the immediate family, and ownership of more than one liquor, wine or beer license within the City. Egan moved, Smith seconded the motion to approve the amendment and authorize its publication and implementation. All voted in favor. JOHNNY CARE RIDGE 5TH ADDITION Paul Hauge discussed with the City Council a meeting that had been held at the request of the attorney and representatives of Good Value Homes with the City staff regarding a proposed legal action against the City to force the council to approve the preliminary plat application for the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. The proposal was to include 3 additional four-plex units and it was noted that the City Council had denied the application at its regular meeting on September 16, 1986. The developer had proposed to eliminate one four-plex unit, but the Councilmembers noted there were other reasons for the denial of the application provided in the Resolution at the City Council meeting. Blomquist moved, Wachter seconded the motion to reaffirm the Council action regarding the application covering Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition, which was adopted at its regular council meeting on September 16, 1986, based upon the reasons that were determined by the Council at that time. All voted in favor. PORNOGRAPHIC FILM OBJECTIONS Gregory Gappa had submitted a complaint to the Police Department regarding the rental of pornographic films with Video Update at 4215 Nicols Road. The Police Department and City Attorney's office hadreviewed the pornographic ___issue and determined that it's very difficult to enforce strict pornographic control. I CHECKLIST ` Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to approve the following checklists dated October 31, 1986 in the amount of $875,378.17 and November 6, 1986 in the amount of $671,351,52. All voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Blomquist moved, Wachter seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 11:25 p.m. All voted yea. PHH Cit Clerk Z4 12 " F-, t*.n.�.r^._.,-.,: v,;.. } t t `.� - ',� z x•'��:..•-r'�\• :: �"'b' �. •yr-'ra.w fir,+• -:,r: 5s�i-i: ;,;� a eve —�r }. � Y '. k-': ? K xi'.o.'.��.:• i,t _ _:!�y:P' yiF iI+o'$a�"6. {al:.•�. c. Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS B. Public Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Contract 87-6, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) --As a result of Council approval of Project 473 on September 16, 1986, the Council authorized the preparation of detailed plans to install the trunk storm sewer outlets through Evergreen Park, Berry Ridge Park and south of City Hall to accommodate the storm water runoff associated with the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their approval and authorization to advertise for competitive bids. A consulting engineer and the Public Works Director will be available to discuss the details of this project and answer any questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans and specifications for Contract 87-6 (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) and authorize advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, April 16, 1987. Item 2. Contract 87-5, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer and Lexington Hills - Sanitary Sewer) --Contract 87-5 combines Projects 478 (Lexington Hills - Sanitary Sewer) and Project 479 (Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) into one contract. As a result of the public hearings held on November 18 and December 16, 1986 respectively, the Council approved the project and authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications which have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their approval and authorization to advertise for competitive bids. The consulting design engineer and Public Works Director will be available to discuss the details of this project and answer any questions. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans and order advertisement for bids for Contract 87-5 (Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer and Lexington Hills - Sanitary Sewer) for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, April 17, 1987. '7 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One Item 3. Contract 87-7, Approve Plans/Order Advertisment for Bids (Lone Oak 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities) --As a result of the project approval at the public hearing held on February 3, 1987, the Council authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications to provide for the installation of sanitary sewer, water main and street improvements along O'Neill Drive to provide service to the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their approval and authorization to advertise for competitive bids. The consulting design engineer and Public Works Director will be available to discuss the details of this project answer any questions. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans for Contract 87-7 (Lone Oak 2nd Addition - Streets and Utilities) and authorize an advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, April 17, 1987. Item 4. Contract 87-10, Approve P lans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Nancy Circle - Streets) --At the public hearing of December 2, 1986, the Council continued consideration for the installation of streets and related storm sewer for the Nancy Circle cul-de-sac west of Nicols Road. This continuation was based on objections from the property owners regarding the "estimated" costs contained in the feasibility report and indicated they may be receptive if competitive bids could reduce those estimated costs. Subsequently, the Council authorized the preparation of plans and specifications to allow solicitation of competitive bids. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their review, approval and authorization to advertise for those bids. The consulting design engineer and Public Works Director will be available to discuss the details of these plans and answer any questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 87-10 (Nancy Circle - Streets) and authorize advertisement for bids to be held at 10:30 a.m. Thursday, April 16, 1987. Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two Item 5. County Contract 31-21 (City Project 466), Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Pilot Knob Road) --The County has completed the detailed plans for the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road from I -35E to Rebecca Lane, south of Cliff Road and the related upgrading of County Roads 32 (Cliff Road) and 30 (Diffley Road) approximately 1/4 mile in either direction of the Pilot Knob Road intersections. These plans have been reviewed and revised several times, taking into consideration the concerns expressed by the City Council and general public during the several public hearings and subsequent neighborhood meetings and individual public contacts made during the past several months. A final detailed plan review was held with the County on March 16 and specific questions and formal presentation will be provided by representatives of the County Highway Department at the meeting on March 17. In order for this project to be initiated yet this year, it is important that these plans be approved to allow the acquisition of the required right-of-way and approval from various state agencies to allow construction to begin approximately -the first part of July. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for County Contract 31-21 (City Project 466) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the related cost participation agreement and all other related documents. Item 6. Contract 85-00, Final Acceptance (Lexington Square Phase II - Utility and Street Improvements) --Staff has received from Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., a certificate of compliance with City approved plans and specifications for the installation of utility and street improvements to service Lexington Square Phase II. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for formal acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize formal acceptance of the Lexington Square Phase II - Utility and Street improvements for perpetual maintenance. Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS UPDATE CONSIDERATION FOR FINANCING C. Consider a Method of Financing for Radio Communications System -- A project to upgrade and replace much of the radio communications equipment is progressing. Please refer to a project status report, enclosed on pages ZL _ through _171 that was requested by this office from Dr. John DuBois, the City's communications consulting engineer. Since various equipment items will be purchased in 1987, it is essential that the City Council determine the method of financing for the funding of this project. The Director of Finance would like to establish a fund and earmark all equipment acquisition out of that fund similar to the Public Works Garage and other projects the City has authorized in recent years. It is anticipated that the radio communications project will cost approximately $404,000. The cost analysis was performed by Administrative Assistant Hohenstein, dated August 15, 1986, a copy is enclosed on pages Z77-- through Z7,3 This information was taken from estimates and p—roposals as prepared by Dr. DuBois. The Director of Finance is recommending that the City consider either the use of equipment certificates or utilizing a portion of the fund balance for the acquisition of this equipment. For additional information and a recommendation, refer to the attached memo from the Director of Finance entitled"various project financing; which specifically addresses the radio communications equipment. This memo is enclosed on pagesi7�_ through �. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To designate a method of financing for the acquisition of radio communications equipment as approved for acquisition by Dr. John DuBois who is representing the City as a radio communications consultant. E JOHN R. DuBOIS Communications Consulting Engineer Registered Professional Electrical Engineer t1arch 7, 1987 Chief Jay Berthe Eagan.Police Department Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, IMM 55122 Dear Chief Berthe: 7005 Heatherton Trail Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Telephone (612) 927-6810 The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the project status report that you requested on Harch 5, 1987. Over the past year on several occasions, I have been requested to provide a list of required project tasks along with a time table for task completion. On each occasion, I provided the requested task/time table summary; however, the City Council only formally approved my contract on August 5, 1986, so some of my earlier task/time tables summaries were unrealistic because they called for task completion in early 1986, before I was given the project "go ahead". As we discussed with the new Fire Chief on February 26, 1987, the project is pretty well on track now so I believe the following task/time table summary is realistic: Task No. Task Com-) 1 eti on Date 1. New PS Freq. determination Sept 1986 2, PS Freqs. coordination Oct 1986 3. PS Freqs. FCC licensing Nov 1986 4. PS Freqs. repeater waiver Jan 1987 5. PS Repeater FCC licensing Feb 1987 6. PIPJ Freqs. coordination Aug 1986 7. PW Freqs. FCC licensing Sept 1986 8. Console Requirements Jan 1987 7q I John R. DuBois 2 Task/Time table (Cont.) Task No. Task Completion Date 9. Satellite Receiver site determination Jan 1987 10. Contracts for sites not required 11. Transition planning for PS System Nar 1987 12. Console Design flar 1987 13. Console bidding including recorder April 1987 14. Satellite Receiver system design (PS) Feb 1987 15. Satellite Receiver system bidding (PS) April 1987 16. Pty! Repeater bidding April 1987 17. PW bases bidding April 1987 18. PS repeater bidding April 1987 19. PS bases bidding April 1987 20. PS mobile and portable modifications Oct 1987 21. PW mobile modifications Sept 1987 22. Purchase new PS walkie—talkies Dec 1986 23. Purchase new PW mobiles and walkie—talkies Feb & May 1987 24. Purchase new PS pagers May 1987 25. Install new Pty; bases and repeater Sept 1987 26. Install new PS repeater Oct 1987 27. Install new PS Bases Nov 1987 28. Complete PS Mobile installations Oct 1987 29. Install PS Satellite receiver voting system Nov 1987 30. Install console and recorder Nov 1987 zea r John R. DuBois 3 Task/Time table (Cont.) Task No. Task Completion Date 31. Comprehensive final system inspection Dec 1987 32. Final written report on system performance and compliance Jan 1988 Please call me at 348-4081 if you have any questions about this project report. I am pleased to be of continuing service to you in this important project. Enclosed is an itemized statement that covers my professional services and authorized expenses over the period January 5. 1981 to 1111arch 7, 1987. Yours sincerei John R, DuBois Ph.D. Registered Professional Communications Engineer Minnesota Registration #7350 JRD/jmk cc: City Administrator Thomas L. Hedges Director of Public Works. Thomas A. Colbert P.E. f�f , •1!rf MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN DATE: AUGUST 15, 1986 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF RADIO BID FLOW CHART The discrepancy between the original radio estimate and that contained within Dr. DuBois' correspondence is a result of several mathematical errors and omissions in the tables prepared by his office. They are listed below. 1. July 14, 1986 Cost Summary Total $355,520 2. Omissions a. Omission of items #11 & #16 of original summary - $11,500 b. Omission of Engineering in updated summary 33,440 c. Engineering summary discrepancy from Action Plan to Phased Implementation 44 0) . _ .-Y p+s2 F. or -e 1110, 1rtp" ,.:.i ,--1-Yh.T E A L.:.J••., a._ p i 3. Subtotal $44,500 4. 10% Contingency 4,450 5. Total $48,950 48,950 6. Original Cost Summary Total $404,470 In addition, I have spoken with the department heads to determine how much of this total may have been included in the 1987 budget expended to date. An order has been placed for two base station units totaling $10,372. This represents equipment in item 2.a. above which was estimated at $11,500 and should be deducted from the study total. These items will be charged against the radio account set up in finance and do not appear in the current or -future budgets (Attachment I). In July, various departments combined to purchase radio equipment for new equipment and vehicles not covered under Dr. DuBois' study. Dr. DuBois consulted on this purchase to be certain that the equipment would be compatible with the specified equipment in the study. The cost of this equipment should not be deducted from the study total (Attachment II). In addition, the Fire Department has included $152,450 worth of equipment covered by the study in its 1987 budget request. Attachment III covers this request. z�� The Parks Department has budgeted one radio for 1987 for a new vehicle which was not covered by the study. No other department has purchased, ordered or budgeted such equipment to date or for the 1987 budget year. Ad ini rative Assistant Attachments JH/cks z�3 MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 1987 SUBJECT: VARIOUS PROJECT FINANCING In your memo of December 4, 1986, you requested that I review various projects for which specific financing arrangements have not been made, and prepare some thoughts about available revenues. My thoughts are as follows: 1. Comparable Worth Adjustments: The 1986 retroactive adjustments were made within the operating budgets of each department. The 1986 contingency was set at $82,950 and it was noted that some or all of it would be necessary to fund these comparable worth adjustments. While no specific transfers have been made from the contingency account, expenditures are expected to exceed appropriations by approximately $35,000 total in all operating departments. A portion of this was caused by the adjustments for comparable worth. I would recommend that the same approach be used for 1987 adjustments. The 1987 contingency is set at $111,920 and again is available for these adjustments. Also the cost of living increase budgeted was slightly higher than actual, although it was against a lower base. I do not believe any additional action would be appropriate at this time, however, a year end adjustment may be necessary if there are significant expenditures over the budget in addition to comparable worth. 2. Radio Communications Equipment: As I understand it, the financing requirement is approximately $400,000 and only limited discussion has taken place as to what might be the appropriate revenue source. I see the following as possibilities although it is certainly not necessarily an all-inclusive list: 1. A combination of interfund borrowing to front the expentiures and departmental appropriations in subsequent years to repay the loan. This would be the same arrangement as we are using for the municipal garage expansion. 2. An appropriation of the general fund balance to finance the acquisition. I am estimating that 1986 operations will result in an increase of approximately $625,000 to the fund balance. That increase along with the approved 1987 general fund budget of $7,389,630 would mean that the ending fund balance would be approximately 36% of the next operating budget. A $400,000 reduction in the fund balance would reduce that to approximately 30%. I believe the range we have been attempting to achieve is 30-35 per cent so either of these positions would be appropriate. 10 e Project Financing February 6, 1987 Page Two 3. A sale of equipment certificates could be used. Given the size of the purchase and the expected useful life of the system, equipment certificates would certainly be a reasonable funding source. This would require a future ad valorem levy and is inconsistent with the current desire to not use equipment certificates. In my opinion, option number 2 would be the best course of action, balancing current requirements against future needs, although it is important to maintain an adequate fund balance. This should, therefore, be viewed as a one-time appropriation with no additional money available until such time as the reserves are again built up to the high end of the acceptable range. Because of the December 31, 1986 defecit in the fund purchasing this equipment, it would be helpful to have this funding issue settled in time to include the relative information in the year end financial report in narrative fashion. 3. Transportation Study: I would recommend that this study be financed from the major street fund. The benefits of the study are directly tied to the purpose of this fund, consequently, it should incur the related costs for the study. The only other alternative I see would be an appropriation in the general fund through the Street Department or the Public Works/Engineering Department. 4. County Road Construction 5. Other Road Improvements: Because of the amount of research required and the number of projects under construction as well as planned, the review on these items has not been completed. We will continue to work on it as time is available. Please let me know if you would like any additional information at this time or if you would like to discuss this in more detail. � V Finance rector/City Clerk EJ V/j eh ��5 Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four DISCUSSION/E-Z AIR PARR IDS PERMIT D. Discussion/E-Z Air Park IDS Permit --City staff has taken a position that the City of Eagan not be considered a co-permitee for the E -Z Air Park parking facility. Apparently the E -Z Air Park parking facility will exceed 1,000 parking spaces which has triggered the necessity of an Indirect Source Permit issuance by MPCA. By assuming the posture of a co-permitee, the City of Eagan inherits the liability/responsibility for monitoring all transportation and related activities in the future with MPCA. The concern the city administrator and city planner have shared is the necessity for additional staffing if the City serves as co-permitees for numerous Indirect Source Permits. The City has already agreed to be the co-permitee for projects such as Eagan Heights, Town Centre 70, and Wachovia, which includes the Cray research parcel. There was some concern that MPCA would not grant the Indirect Source Permit if the City would not be a co-permitee; however, since this item was published as an agenda item, MPCA did grant the Indirect Source Permit. Please refer to the attached letter found on pages 7,77 through_ for additional information. The city planner and city administrator would like to briefly discuss the City Council's position on whether the City should continue objecting to the co-permitee status for the City of Eagan or treat each IDS's on a case by case basis with review and consideration by the Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide some direction to City staff regarding the co-permitee process for Indirect Source Permits. 716 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 March 10, 1987 SUSANNE M PELLY, AICP DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 520 LAFAYETTE RD N ST PAUL, MN 55155 Re: E -Z Air Park Draft Indirect Source Permit Dear Ms. Pelly: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk The purpose of this correspondence is to comment on the Draft Indirect Source Permit (DISP) for the E -Z Air Park parking facility located in the City of Eagan, Minnesota. My principal' concern regards the requirement that the City of Eagan serve as a co-permitee to the E -Z Air Park permit. While the City of Eagan has willingly served in this capacity with previous permits, I believe the need does not exist to require the City of Eagan to be a co-permitee for E -Z Air Park. Therefore, in absence of this administrative and technical rationale, I object to the co - permittee requirement of the E -Z Air Park DISP. The City of Eagan has an established record of cooperating with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) regarding the agency's requirement for cities to serve as co-permitees with respect to Indirect Source Permits. At the present time, the City of Eagan serves as a co-permitee to four Indirect Source Permits. These permits include the Wachovia Eagan mixed-use development (ISP #86-7, issued on August 12, 1986); the Eagan Heights Commercial Park (ISP #86-9, issued on October 1, 1986); the Town Centre 70 (ISP #86-11, issued on December 3, 1986); and most recently, the JAR Eagan mixed-use development (ISP #87-3, issued on January 14, 1987). _ In a period of less than one year, the City of Eagan has agreed to serve as a co-permitee to four major Indirect Source Permits. The City of Eagan did this because, as as explained by MPCA staff, a reasonable need existed for cities to serve as co- permitees for particular Indirect Source Permits. As represented by MPCA staff in early 1986, cities would be required to serve as co-permitees to Indirect Source Permits where the projects were anticipated to be multi -phase, multi-year, and mixed-use developments of significant scale and size. In relation to one 7-77 THE LONE OAK TREE. .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY SUSANNE M PELLY MARCH 10, 1987 PAGE TWO project, MPCA staff indicated a concern regarding the developer being from out of state. Serving as a co-permitee to the four aforementioned Indirect Source Permits, the City of Eagan essentially acquiesced and respected MPCA's requirement to participate in the Indirect Source Permit process. The E -Z Air Park DISP is not of the same nature nor on the same scale or size of the Wachovia, Eagan Heights, Town Centre 70, and JAR Indirect Source Permits. The E -Z Air Park is not a multi- phase, multi-year, or mixed-use project. Very simply, the E -Z Air Park project is a long-term parking facility for automobiles that would otherwise congest transportation facilities at the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. This project does not pose any threat to air quality standards nor does it negatively impact the regional, county, and/or city roadway systems. The E -Z Air Park facility is a very innocuous development that in no way requires the City of Eagan to serve as a co-permitee to the Indirect Source Permit. Since an administrative and technical rationale does not exist for requiring the City to serve as a co-permitee, I object to this condition of the E -Z Air Park DISP. I trust you understand and appreciate the City of Eagan's concern regarding this matter and believe the issue may be successfully resolved in the very near future. Sincerely, Dale C. Runkle ___ City Planner DCR/mc cc: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Charles D. Nolan, Nolan Brothers, Inc. Richard H. Nau, BRW a�' Agenda Information Memo, March 17, 1987, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Five CONSIDERATION/REFUNDING CERTAIN GO BOND ISSUES E. Consider refunding certain outstanding General Obligation Bond Issues --The Director of Finance and City Administrator have been meeting with representatives of Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. to analyze both General Obligation and Revenue Bond debt that is outstanding to determine whether refunding any of the issues would represent a positive savings to the City of Eagan. Attached on page _Z�gE) _ is a copy of the bonds that have been reviewed to date by Miller & Schroeder. The General Obligation improvement bonds of 1978 and 1979 will, not be considered for refunding. The Crossover Refunding Bonds of 1987 and the various bond issues listed as Refunding Bonds of 1987 are being given further consideration. The City Staff would like direction from the City Council to proceed on a more in depth review of all outstanding bond issues and further determine whether it is in the best interest for the City to consider refunding certain bonds and if so, a bond sale and additional information would be prepared for distribution and consideration at the April 7 meeting. The municipal rates are extremely favorable at the present time and would provide a significant reduction in the interest charges for many of the bond issues. Any restructuring would guarantee a positive cash flow and avoid any potential short fall in a bond fund in the future caused for the most part by the large number of prepayments that occurred for improvement bond issues. However, by refunding the City can no long enjoy high interest that could be received on the investment of funds particularly if interest rates should increase and investments become more lucrative in comparison to the interest rate charged on the bond funds. The City Administrator will answer any questions the City Council might have on Tuesday. A detailed schedule of an analysis for all the refunding debt considerations have been distributed to the Finance Committee City Councilmember Smith and City Councilmember Egan for their review. There may be a necessity to hold a Finance Committee meeting between this City Council Meeting and the April 7 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: City Administrator to proceed with refunding certain General Obligation and To provide direction to the further consideration of Revenue Bond Issues. CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA REFUNDING DEBT ANALYSIS I. $1,915,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1978 $1,825,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1979 II. $3,525,000 Crossover Refunding Bonds of 1987 III. $2,825,000 Advance Refunding Bonds of 1987 $ 690,000 Advance Refunding Bonds of 1987 $1,150,000 Advance Refunding Bonds of 1987 $ 975,000 Advance Refunding Bonds of 1987 $2,825,000 Advance Refunding Bonds of 1987 $6,375,000 Advance Refunding Bonds of 1987 $9,400,000 Advance Refunding Bonds of 1987 MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL, INC. March, 1987 z TO