Loading...
07/07/1987 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR b%L i "G '. RAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL JULY 7, 1987 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES .� III. 6:40 - REAL ESTATE TAR ABATEMENTS - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE IV. 6:45 - PRESENTATION TO ANTHONY JOHNSON V. 6:50 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Fire Department '-� I. Review Plans for Fire Station #4 Public Works Department k• 1. Authorize Update of Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer & Water Mgmt Plans VI. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA PKI A. Personnel Items �k B. 1987 Trailer Permit Renewals 13 C. Plumbers Permit �p VS D. Project 502, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (R&B Addition - Storm Sewer) ` ISEReapprove Final Plat, Wyndham Corporate Center Addition PSS F. Approve Change Order #1, Contract 86-17 (Sperry Consolidation Facility) VaG. Project 511, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Hidden Valley - Sanitary Sewer) P,1cp H. Project 512, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Cutters Ridge - Utilities) I. Final Plat Approval for Parkside Addition.. a•��J. Final Plat Approval for Danbury Addition 1,�l K. Final Plat Approval for Lexington Parkview Addition P 23 L. Final Plat Approval for Lexington Point Addition Final Plat Approval for Rockwoods Woods Addition �ag N. Investment Custody Agreement .z6o. Approval of Records Retention Schedule ,� 2P. Appointments to Minnesota Police Recruitment Q. Project 513, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Brittany 10th - Trunk I' Water Main) R. Project 504, Deceive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Whispering Woods 2nd Addition --Storm Sewer) S. Project 450, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Williams & LaRue Addition) Utilities) T. Project 464, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Wyndham Corporate Center - Streets and Utilities) VII. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS qS A -Project 487, Braun Court - Streets & Storm Sewer <1B. Project 496, Brittany 10th Addition - Storm Sewer -0C. Project 480, Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Street Overlay (Item will be continued) P, 10D. Project 499, Chapel Hill Baptist Church - Streets & Storm Sewer (Item will be continued) Vacation of Public Street Right -of -Way - Technology Circle VIZI. VacOLD BUSINESS Q :lam A. Pondview Addition Clarification of Uses/Rocky Rococo Restaurant I%...II NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion Regarding Use of Barbeque Grills on Deeks/Balconies of Multifamily y Dwellings �.O�( B. Special Use Permit (Century 21) for Two Temporary Signs on the SE Corner of Hwy 13 and Blackhawk Rd, NW1/4 of Sec 17 C. Variance (James & Cheryl Snede) for 1.5' Sideyard Setback to Allow a 3.5' Setback on Lot 10, Block 1, St. Francis Wood PX03 D. Waiver of Plat (B.H.Grace) for Duplex Lot Splits on Lot 4, Block 2, and Lot 5, Block 1, Rahn Ridge Add, On Vienna Lane Near Kings Rd, NE1/4, Sec 31 �o7 E. Waiver of Plat, Zachman Brothers, For Twin Home Lots splits on Lots 10 and 11, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th Add, Cinnamon Ridge Near Mecalf Dr, SW1/4, Sec 30 F. Sign Permit, Federal Land Company, For Three Signs in the Town Centre Addition P'II (NW1/4, Sec 15) \.4 G. Building Permit -to Construct a Fence Between Amoco Car Care Center and Tom Thumb Market Located in the Yankee Square Shopping Center �a% H. Rezoning (Meritor Corporation) for Eagan Royale Addition Revised of Approximately 46.848 Acres from A (Agriculture) to R-1 (Single Family) and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 72 Lots Located in SE1/4 of Sec 31 Abutting Safari Pass on the East/35E on West Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment (Dallas Development) and a Rezoning of ` Approximately 25.35 Acres Including the Existing 8.3 Acre Silver Bell lst Addition from LI (Light Industrial) to Commercial Planned Development and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 3 Lots on 17.05 Acres, a Conditional Use Permit for Motor Fuel Sales, and a Special Use Permit for a Temporary School in an Existing Silver Bell Facility, Located Along Silver Bell Road West of Hwy 13, in the SW1/4 of See 17 and SE1/4 of Sec 18 J. Rezoning (W.F. Murphy) of .84 Agricultural Acres of the Jean Addition to R-2 �j (Double) District and .72 Agricultural Acres to R-1 (Single Family) District and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 2 Lots Located South of Kings Road and North g�of 35E, SE1/4 of Sec 31 K. Rezoning (Wendell E. Carlson) of Approximately 2.6 Acres of the Pine Ridge Addition from A (Agriculture) to R-1 (Single Family and Preliminary Plat Consisting of 7 Lots Located South of Crestridge Lane and West of Kolstad Road, SW 1/4 of Sec 15 PL. Variance for VanEeckout Building Corporation to Encroach into Easement at Lot 2, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds, East of Pilot Knob Road, SW1/4 of Sec 22 M. Refunding of City of Eagan $1,250,000 Commercial Development Revenue Bonds of 1982 (Yankee Square Office III Project) X. ADDITIONAL ITEMS A. Public Improvement Contracts e•�911. Parks Department Contract, Receive Bids/Award Contract, Northview Park/Goat Hill Park Irrigation System Materials P20 102. Contract 87-17, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Blackhawk Rd - Street • Reconstruction) X003. Contract 87-26, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Wescott Rd - Surfacing) 4. Contract 87-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Wescott Road - Grading and 1 Utilities) p�-5. Contract 87-15, Authorize Easement Acquisition (Parcel 10-02300-010-01) �zo�6. Contract 87-21, Approve Plans/Order Ad For Bids (Eagan Hills Farms - Trunk Utilities ,7,20q 7. Contract 87-22, Approve Plans/Order Ad For Bids (Hills of Stone Bridge - Trunk Utilities Pcg8. Contract 87-23, Approve Plans/Order Ad For Bids (Bridle Ridge - Trunk Utilities 72 -KB. Review/Approve 1988 Budget, Gun Club Lake Watershed Mgmt Organization l? - 10I C. Accessory Housing Clarification %I. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) %II. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 11 1987 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR JULY 7, 1987 CITY COUNCIL MEETING After approval is given to the July 7, 1987 agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the June 16, 1987 meeting and special council minutes for the June 9 and June 18 meetings, the following items are in order for consideration: REAL ESTATE TAX ABATEMENTS — DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE The City has received a tax abatement request from the Dakota County Assessor's Office to reduce the market value for the Myron Stapf property which is located on the attached map found on page —2— describing 2describing the property. According to the Assessor's office, after discussion with the builder, it was determined that the stage of completion of the house is 50% rather than 75%. The house was complete on the outside, however, they were in the process of sheetrocking and had no furnace on January 2, 1986. Therefore, the estimated market value should be reduced from $104,400 to $61,200 and the assessed value should be reduced from $29,232 to $17,136 for 1986, payable in 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the tax abatement as presented by the Dakota County Assessor's Office. L501). S87° 26LE. UU I LU 1�O 0 70.00 9 j or�00�?0i N e �03 w 157.46 �0j I� 3\W I I /;too ao JI \ \ O Q 10� ; �/ \ Z VEY 1 `�.EAST 247.00 \ �SUR1NE ro� S.8CPOOOd so 88 159.00 r 147.7 nt 0 20.00 30 i� l 3 r� n N � 2Sfy . 'fes - a g8 2 Subject Parcel 11 o 12 co 8 ego .ki 38 00� 3 ° 3B \ \� vj Q yo �ip.,,,,�n e6N m 2 nP'll 4 sso2 44.75 56 Ip o z+ 5.780 °' E+22° ' 86.0 P 38 34 'g d s Smf=:::s: 44 Q6` J9 ab 8 aza �ti\�r'. Jam+ \`, s�\� 75 165.00 io S a 102.82 122.52 .M 3 �' F 3 d&a 0 F 70 S \ \ \� 63-64 53 z4' oo - ' i29 Cb° a 70 \ aznood ►s ss %/q Y �, x.,93 a� ati� �. \ 00. LA 3 s`J \ it m_b ^' 3 3z . a9 \ p^ 6 o m o o 3°R s r 000, :•l0 O v O O o 0'E 38! C %32 Ow 0 6II 52.01 90.99 ��e g 3z • �, cb. ® o% ICP W WEST 143 I l ?74'• 38 z q h6 tP 78.07 S.7 8000 • O ° /. 0 S� 2629.26 o� 'o OUTLOT 8 O� o W �1 0 S. 880 3C32" W.� — S. B 8° 3;' 3ew 507.06 Myron Staph # 10-65902-060-02 '. OUTLOT A N; 0 z �(D rYfri Z N N 5.88031'32 W. 157.42 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 Mr. Anthony Johnson who resides in the City of Eagan recently was named the U.S. Fencing Champion for the under 19 age bracket. Mr. Johnson will be present to receive a certificate from the City Council. A. FIRE DEPARTMENT Item 1. Review Plans for Fire Station #4--A Public Works Committee meeting was held on Tuesday, June 23, 1987, at the Fire Administration building to meet with the architect and members of the Fire Department Building Committee to review plans and design for Fire Station #4. Also reviewed was a flow chart indicating the timing for finalization of plans and specifications and bidding for Fire Station #4. After some minor modification, the Public Works Committee is in agreement with the plans as being shown and suggested that the design be presented to the City Council at the July 7 meeting, so the architect can proceed with the development of plans and specifications. Enclosed is a copy of a flow chart and an 8 1/2 11 reduced copy of the design for Fire Station #4 found on pages through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize prepare plans and specifications and final design fo preparing bidding specifications for Fire Station #4. 13 the architect to r the purpose of W N xUw IN w 0 N H � U 0 00 N N N � M N cn H O. U H '> M z xw0 a3au 3� W N w�rx cq ow U z< z O a a z •»: z 00 CN N bra C a W N zo kr, w w L4 ¢4_w ri a woo V) 7 z 0 K aj Ul Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT B. Public Works Department: Item 1. Authorize Update of Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer and Water Management Plans --The last comprehensive review and update of our comprehensive sanitary sewer and water main distribution plans was performed during the fall of 1981 with formal approval by Council action on March 2, 1982. That was prior to the completion of I -35E with our population estimated at 23,000. During the past five years, sufficient trunk facilities have been installed when major areas within our community developed. Subsequently, the Public Works Director is strongly recommending that the Council give authorization to perform another update to these comprehensive plans which are an invaluable tool in helping to plan the future growth of the community and reviewing individual development proposals and related requirements. It is also timely, based on the most recent update of the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan which will be used as a basis for determining land uses and resultant sanitary sewer flows and water demands. It is estimated that the sanitary sewer plan update will cost approximately $15,000 and the comprehensive water plan update will cost approximately $25,000. The cost of these revisions and updates should be the responsibility of the trunk sanitary sewer and water funds respectively. Because of the immediate need and the time frame necessary to perform these comprehensive updates, the Public Works Director is requesting Council authorization to initiate this work. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the updating of the comprehensive water and sanitary sewer master plans. Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 There are twenty (20)items on the agenda referred requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. wishes to discuss any of the items in further should be removed from the Consent Agenda Additional Items unless the discussion required PERSONNEL ITEMS to as consent items If the City Council detail, those items and placed under is brief. A. Personnel Items --There are two (2) items to be considered under Personnel Items at this time. 1. Extra Hours for Part-time Dispatchers --The Police Department is experiencing a substantial increase in the number of calls received as well as the seriousness of the calls received. As a result, they are requesting that a budget allocation for 20 extra hours per week for coverage in the dispatch center be approved. The time would be shared by the part-time dispatchers already on the staff. The additional time would give the Police Department double (2 dispatcher) coverage until 2:00 a.m. on week nights and until 3:00 a.m. on Fridays and Saturdays. It would also give double coverage on Sundays from 1:00 p.m. until midnight. Double coverage is needed at these times because of the additional number and seriousness of the calls which are received during these hours. The total cost for the remainder of 1987 for these 20 additional hours would be approximately $4,000. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve funding for 20 additional hours per week for coverage in the Police Dispatch Center. 2. MIS Coordinator --The City received over 150 applications for the position of MIS Coordinator unfortunately, a great many of these did not match the qualifications for which the City had advertised. However, from the applications which were close to matching those qualifications, sixteen applicants were chosen to come to the Eagan Municipal Center for an interview with City Administrator Hedges, Administrative Assistant Duffy, Administrative Assistant Hohenstein and the MIS Coordinator from St. Louis Park, Clint Pires. Of those sixteen, twelve accepted the invitation to interview. The interviews were held and from that session, five candidates were selected for a final interview. Currently, references are being checked on the five finalists. It is expected that the City Administrator will be able to supply a name for recommendation for hire for the MIS Coordinator at the City Council meeting on July 7, 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of a candidate yet to be named as MIS Coordinator for the City of Eagan, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. /n Agenda Information Memo July 7, 1987 TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS B. 1987 Trailer Permit Renewals --There are six (6) trailer permit renewals in order for consideration by the City Council. Administra- tive Intern Bruce Robertson made an on-site inspection of eight trailers in use in the City, and of the eight, six are being used according to conditions of approval set forth by the City Council. Two trailers, one utilized by Joe Steininger at 670 Lone Oak Road and the other by Jim Horne at 3850 Coronation Drive, do not appear to comply with the conditions of approval and, therefore, staff is not requesting their renewal at this time. Enclosed on page I is a list of the trialer permit renewals as presented for consideration by Administrative Assistant Witt for consideration by the Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the trailer permit renewals for 1987 as presented. /l JUNE 16, 1987 TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS 1. Tripp Oil Co. 3085 Hwy. 13 Eagan, MN 55121 2. Earl Marotzke -535 Gun Club Road Rosemount, MN 55068 3. Alwin & Lyle Schultz 1315 Carriage Hills Dr Eagan, MN 55123 4. Edmund Schwanz 810 Yankee Doodle Rd Eagan, MN 55123 5. Levi Heuer 550 Diffley Rd Eagan, MN 55123 6. Dakota Homes 3660 Dodd Road Eagan, MN 55121 Permitted prior to 1970 and remains in use as an office. Permitted prior to 1970 and remains in use as a family home. Permitted prior to 1970 and remains in use as a family home. Permitted in 1980 and remains as a residence for Mr. Schwanz"s mother. Permitted in 1983 and remains in use as a residence for George Meister. Permitted in 1972 and remains in use as a sales office for mobile homes. M Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 PLUMBERS PERMITS C. Plumbers Permits --Enclosed on page is a list of plumbers whose permit renewals are in order for Co6ricil consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plumbers permits as presented. 13 PLUMBERS LICENSES JULY 7, 1987 1. GERRY'S PLUMBING, INC. 2. HERITAGE PLUMBING, INC. 3. MAPLEWOOD PLUMBING & HEATING 4. MARTY'S PLUMBING & HEATING 5. MEVISSEN PLUMBING 6. PEINE PLUMBING & HEATING 7. PIPER PLUMBING, INC. 8. WILLIAM RIDLER PLUMBING & HEATING 9. SOLBERG PLUMBING 10. STATE MECHANICAL Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 PROJECT 502, RECEIVE REPORT ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (R & B ADDITION - STORM SEWER) D. Project 502, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (R & B Addition - Storm Sewer) --In response to the petition submitted by the developers of the proposed R & B Addition located south of the curve of Duckwood Drive west of Denmark Avenue, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of storm sewer facilities necessary for this development. This feasibility report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 502 (R & B Addition - storm sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held August 4, 1987. REAPPROVE FINAL PLAT, WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER ADDITION E. Reapprove Final Plat, Wyndham Corporate Center Addition --On July 15, 1986, the City Council approved the final plat for the Wyndham Corporate Center Addition on the west side of Pilot Knob Road opposite Corporate Center Drive. However, the developer did not proceed with the filing of the plat with the County within the sixty days required by City ordinance. Subsequently, the final plat approval expired on September 15, 1986. The developer has been informed of this situation and has indicated a willingness to proceed with the recording of this plat. However, this will require formal reapproval by Council action to allow this plat to be recorded. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To reapprove the ,final plat of Wyndham Corporate Center Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, CONTRACT 86-17 SPERRY CONSOLIDATION FACILITY) F. Approve Change Order No. 1, Contract 86-17 (Sperry Consolidation Facility) --We have received a request from Unisys Corporation pertaining to a revision and expansion of the parking lot/entrance drive for their new consolidation facility being constructed under City Contract 86-17 as a part of the TIF district. All costs associated with this change order would be the responsibility of this development and within the funding guidelines of the original TIF issue. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract 86-17 (Sperry Consolidation Facility). /J--/ Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 PROJECT 511, RECEIVE PETITION,/AUTHORIZE FEASIBILITY REPORT (HIDDEN VALLEY — SANITARY SEWER) G. Project 511, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Hidden Valley - Sanitary Sewer) --The staff has received a petition requesting the preparation of a feasibility report to extend the trunk sanitary sewer from the Birch Park/Wescott Road lift station to the proposed Hidden Valley Addition located south of Skovdale No. 2. All costs have been guaranteed should the project not be approved at the public hearing process. ACTION TO -BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report and detailed plans and specifications for Project 511 (Hidden Valley - trunk sanitary sewer) . _PROJE_CT_512,_RECEIVE PETITION/AUTHORIZE FEASIBILITY REPORT (CUTTERS RIDGE - UTILITIES) H. Project 512, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Cutters Ridge - Utilities) --The staff has received a petition from the developers of the proposed Cutters Ridge Addition which is presently being processed through the Planning Commission as a single-family development on the west side of Pilot Knob Road opposite from the Hidden Valley Addition (just north of the Bryant parcel). This petition requests the installation of storm and sanitary sewer extensions from I -35E to this parcel and also the installation of the trunk water main as may be required as a condition of development. Although the petitioner has guaranteed all costs associated with the preparation of this report, if the Council feels that it is too premature prior to considering the preliminary plat application, this item should be continued to the August 18 Council meeting when it is anticipated that the preliminary plat application and this recommendation from the Planning Commission will be considered by the Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the feasibility report and detailed plans and specifications for Project 512 (Cutters Ridge - utilities) or continue until August 18, 1987. 16 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR PARRSIDE ADDITION I. Final Plat Approval for Parkside Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Parkside Addition located east of Lexington Avenue and south of the Stuart Addition as shown by the plat enclosed on page M. All conditions of preliminary plat approval by Council action on April 21, 1987 have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff,' and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Parkside Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /7 •r �Ji �� 17nM3. •• ••M019Nia711 t F° m WA N 1 � 1 l l Ll i q .. .. �� ��•� `' ?' P Ba '� ' � :S I i • �� `. ,' �? i � .-•r is � ���• .I.1 �.. rte. ` it ul •r �Ji �� 17nM3. •• ••M019Nia711 t F° m WA N Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR DANBURY ADDITION J. Final Plat Approval for Danbury Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Danbury Addition located within the Lexington Square development as shown by the plat contained on page ZO All conditions of the preliminary plat approval by Council action on March 17, 1987 have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff, and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Danbury Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. i9 N r2 � 1 _.1� is •O i f---� -- — --_. 10111._—_---• W � Y 1..0 .Cb \ :rh , oo' ry ark tit e OA ,F � � 1 _.1� is •O i f---� -- — --_. 10111._—_---• 1 Y i Q'r bQ N cveol I I N D1 W ON + Q a G s 1 ^ I..i.. 1 g � i r: I O I It i1:+.17i Yr N I Cri.. ^ Y M N .1 .Oo�oO� N 18 �N M Y N " U W � In w t1 Q J Z 2 $ 9 O 13 ,Ira x 4_—r.CC.60 .1 ----w is, J I oo' ry ark tit e OA ,F � � 1 _.1� is •O i f---� -- — --_. 10111._—_---• 1 ; _—_..iIVGI_-_--• ..tea wli IM .sG .7 NW bQ �iC I I N D1 ON + Q G s ■ r: I O I It i1:+.17i Yr N I Cri.. =;9c w r ..y., i N .1 .Oo�oO� Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR LEXINGTON PARKVIEW ADDITION K. Final Plat Approval for Lexington Parkview Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Lexington Parkview Addition located east of Lexington Avenue and south of Northview Park Road as shown by the plat contained on page All conditions of preliminary plat approval by Council action on February 17, 1987 have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted and reviewed by staff. All items are in order with the exception of the development contract agreement not being fully executed by all underlying fee owners of the property in question. Therefore, if the Council wants to consider formal approval of this final plat, it should be subject to the condition that no documents be executed by the Mayor and City Clerk until fully executed by all identified property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Lexington Parkview Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents only after properly executed by all identified property owners. -P/ W L.L 6 z 0 z_ X W J 'NCIM 1!',41=1 S -1-M-1 N01MIX-3I \ \ W 13S 0/1 45'1/1 MN JD 3,411 •1MS` \ M„LI ,Ib 9LZZZI °6B N 28t,& 1 £6L£b r --bbl"'-- 810<2 9e OO GB -IS OZI OOSa /'3 691[£ b£99 T\ In I * \� - _.. ]Nw3� 3 .arV. • _rrre�-.. __- L”/o3I ! 1 m ` ��w �\ s- n m 18 dN co J � '�� ., sir Ya '^ 1 a I M: �£Oeoc•� � o s\`\ �•y� �r"u _ I a� �o� J :.�' / / a`• / / 1 Q I l0 " \ f•9 b ,1 `•�-6 LSSJ LUO Z I 1pti \ ` A 9£'192 p V a iD W N I 3 I _ N _ a IV Y a 6F9D%' p�6 R M .[1,1!.69 N A °+°8 t�pBv n ,a rO �_3.90,9b.be I \ .T Bb OSI r-DOSe_ C_°O'Se_ Bot, 6p pt \ S O 494m-_ _ O \ r, 5f I l / 2 3 M �I.mzae 1 rrc loe I ory°sp3 I I I o,cfl29, u o5 l-6�4__ _---.1 IA to f O m I I I o 15 "° e0 U pppel $ Q U M pp pI ° I I m O 'rJ M i N `9-' I = a Q g d m co�1O I(7 O -----------.r o - b r I I I I a m __ ►- `v r- oosel- IW .,'IW 1`"_ 0oos --- t p cru g v U L0006 -J Loose-' .°osB- L 26!01--J ----90 eel---- O M ,(ki i vo .68 N 1 Ico g t,1 N m ----- ----� S a n n o5, M1 m _ -_ O 4 --oosel.---- - J p - I W L Y 19. Ilk O ,n L-- _.o0°B1 b Z o IF - ----------1 __1 m' - o J^ N a �--- 19691---_ l�_-1B91B -`_ MI 1 O eo.". - o g N F - t5 1 J 1 •q �-r.�.----------� n m 'pp" rte' ° 1 � Ae 9- � C7 W 0E '. -`� r 1 in o I �+.° x _ 000Bl a [u Z N �N 8 m o m L------------ 1 �a __ at-' _ N m- m O _ CO m '7 1R M f ----9L 961 ------, _ 196 1 1 'f- ' Q m K Qi 1 f LLT L_ IN B0. 23 30 E' p 0 f - s`� C R m to p s ------------J p n r f a1Z 1•�� �•r. i �\ n eo ,m, -� (pO --Dose------- o I 9 - O m IQ a .d °ODP ` .20 'Z17 66 s ti - I -------------1 �z m zoo°n'_--96£11- J L -�--9£061---�- /6 o --- 4$n\ +r--- — �- 3-:11 .91-.6B 6. __-� m .x, J N 2 am N / MSO,£b.69 NA �� (�---------;1 I/ h 1_` W. r- £6EOZ______-t p6E;� Fpa�6A 96£11 Dora--- I Y - J \ ILB41 ,t] 'd .Z49SN Fj L P , - 1 W-- - [6 to, T IL 80Z pp ; _m_.LI .lb .6e-�---- ti h ; - o -{9681_- /�� `� ti O / N n0 F r� OI °Di_s�y�1 1 M .B'.6S .6fi -sj ■� ((�� ('•y, . m $ p j--- / 2`y RKi b0 n ° M 1120,£! 0681 N 1 a09 �Z d /' s n n' N �d I w 1 aN- d N t2 m I I F- L___B[B21______.-El: I md °° - to I I I z A R r I o v m 8' �c l -ao / M1 / / \v' /'4 t0 I r3.�.61.68-s-P O �\ P^ / / .'O' OCCS -- I N 1 M •B1 ,6S .6B- 4 _ 0006.3/ - II/� �cr � N ry , ! ' \ \ s .. my 5 00011-- W /'• SO.2t7068 N ' �_ j' �� b`2 yy �, .01.10 --- 0011 .1 A �/� \`r o° .3 9 °6si O I h I oers I'B a M O 0- M z;lsy`Jof,�/`,M�•2b,BlrN� tiO W ='1 rl! 1 ti I• -BO BSI__ Cf I I� N •1. / N 0.� �2y'1 f pl, r, O \ F //// M ` C� 9s/ `b s 6 / m �sr`A ° O X 'ass A" l, y'y rysa�^���•`\b�'0/.Mir. M M .Z I IlY /�/ < p�('1j�/r•�•Se. r%" o Di to nyt�D�<�a°' 1 IJJ 81 �� 06` 9, 8I d 4� Do 'os '`. �/ 'C' '1v-,r:o `•� li d, \ <: O. ••-'c > 1 o: L� /V1ni0 ,£b 0691 N 3� ry DiL �rgt3 �°ab�, m i\_�ds :° aI'- IL�90Z i hl i �e� �i m ` ^5� �° rt2•a. r H ' ------1(B'+-- .009 b I m [] o bgti aE r �W a �o 3 � J OC Q r ✓' J o c8 �V rr y `_-OMD I•Be Fry s�--3.[O£b.6B- �9O /d} 1 •/ 2� la -F69•Y O �� •G< s<-5�`---Icebl---A r ((\I OSSI OO0j _6 � m F W 0W 2D35'MI MC't/I MN ,E !0 3111 Xitlo! „ I I _ _ �j,G }G:'A�-lN]w3i.3 •� e� CCI�-- Oo 171 -----Rg 10090 �tiv v ]TwtvD� ,� W > t . \I I g M .20 eb, .68 N .I ° / W H m m Q p NN NN �-ooszl- Y �p 0 3.£0.£b.fie 6- f- 1 0 C b 80 ti .Ng L) A `rp o gam/$' / 6 .' 7' �i Cx t I 3• I-- oo1Z1-J 3.F0 Fb.62 s O m N �Q se >� I_ H S L _._ooszr m M .£0 £b 69 N !- 109£2 -- �z N OOO Ob I 1006 1'00 SP "I i OO Ga -1 I_.WSB__I I•---OO:u--I O O Z W O 1 p (n N u box I l I i zpN Of oc c m I 1 a ''o I 1 I L-o0ie--1 I LOO I W 1 _19b11 LB-- L--00'911- ...1 $ as xdnd M31AH.LUON O0'(O�(VO�b � N fq�Z0 3 11••0,2 °68 s I I: �v L!<�!1QS ;ic.LLit., xx/]3 I f/ 10 111 a: n v Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR LEXINGTON POINTE ADDITION L. Final Plat Approval for Lexington Pointe Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Lexington Pointe Addition located south of Diffley Road and west of N rthview Meadows as indicated by the plat contained on pages Z__ and All conditions of preliminary plat approval by Council action on March 3, 1987 have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff, and found to be. in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:To approve the final plat for Lexington Pointe Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Z3 a a b u o0m Y 3 nbn I QWQ °0.6z.o I « a Yry 5609 M 3 ,91.YZ.10 5' e .o ¢g0$ acs ..j �yy a 'Zg` _fi 27279 W p. 5.12'IS` iV lois �. 00 T HnN "s A" 3 p0 rN� O o : r'�1• nRn O J a rc _ \1 W I.12 N L) = I= a - N W 1 Y` it F I�Nz zZ� - T U U ono b n wi V 0 w � a � � Z y W N / > I �AN 'o a0 2MIwn ul. 3u A i g - iA CJ qQ J n G37J R ��—moi n O dJ �c oN 700 v3d AX'�3 n a a b u o0m Y 3 nbn I QWQ °0.6z.o I « a Yry 5609 M 3 ,91.YZ.10 5' e .o ¢g0$ acs ..j ; 'Zg` _fi 27279 W p. 5.12'IS` iV 0 Id Y 00 T HnN 55 yy 02=I p0 rN� a a b u o0m Y 3 nbn I QWQ °0.6z.o I « a Yry 5609 M 3 ,91.YZ.10 5' e .o ¢g0$ acs s b O= An r es mu I W2 I .. D L6 4 �g j1-- •� 1 J Zt- z W� IIS O $g � m a o pO N 1I8 oa�iSgo co o$ c� r C7: A I� �N� NQI OC •�,�� ON z z s J a l o n C!— Norog w u J p W "� I'►l1a�tl 4ig9d3 0' W Ls V - J o N0rG9 W I TNG O—ENUE _ g r i LES W N z �i 96,662 Un ; 'Zg` _fi 27279 W p. 5.12'IS` iV 0 Id Y 00 . p L�iaw n x < _ Z J O o : r'�1• nRn O J a _ L) = I= a - p W U Z J x r z I`o b n Wx W V 0 II fa J P ! T � 41 I,$ a W i.e �AN 'o a0 2MIwn ul. 3u A s b O= An r es mu I W2 I .. D L6 4 �g j1-- •� 1 J Zt- z W� IIS O $g � m a o pO N 1I8 oa�iSgo co o$ c� r C7: A I� �N� NQI OC •�,�� ON z z s J a l o n C!— Norog w u J p W "� I'►l1a�tl 4ig9d3 0' W Ls V - J o N0rG9 W I TNG O—ENUE _ g r i LES W N z �i 96,662 No!•ss'55r. Un ; 'Zg` _fi 27279 W p. 5.12'IS` iV 0 Id Y 00 . p L�iaw n x < _ Z J O o L p O mn O J a _ L) = I= a - p W U Z J x r z I`o b n Wx W V 0 II fa J P ! T � 41 I,$ a W i.e �AN 'o a0 2MIwn ul. 3u A - iA CJ qQ J n G37J R ��—moi n O dJ �c oN 700 v3d AX'�3 n No!•ss'55r. NO3-00 •• - ; 'Zg` _fi 27279 W p. 5.12'IS` iV 520.65 L. 197.44 no . p L�iaw R• � �� N mo Z J A q Op nm' iHn L p O mn O J i0. N CD z a - U Z J x I— W b n Wx W CD I W$ t N; MM ■1M � a0 2MIwn ul. 3u A LEXINGTON , POINTE ,25 NORTHVIEW ME ADO ti'l' S I2ND ADDITION Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR ROCKWOOD'S WOODS ADDITION M. Final Plat Approval for Rockwood's Woods Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Rockwood's Woods Addition located within the Lakewood Hills Addition north of Cliff Road and west of Oak Pond Hills Addition as shown by the plat contained on page _-2, . All conditions of the preliminary plat approval by Counc 1 action on March 17, 1987 have been satisfactorily complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff, and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Rockwood's Woods Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. C12 m x uj z 0 F- C) MA 0 0 0 0 LI_ 4 --l' iv Qd A v 00 O,t %A9. I OZ .10 .0 6 as 'IGO AV Y.'222' -Z7 2 7 A r i L 3 4 --l' iv Qd A v 00 O,t %A9. I OZ .10 .0 6 as 'IGO AV Y.'222' -Z7 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 INVESTMENT CUSTODY AGREEMENT N. Investment Custody Agreement --It was stated in a recent management letter from Deloitte, Haskins and Sells that the City is presenting a certain amount of risk from current investment practices. The Director of Finance has responded to that footnote and is recommending the City use First Trust as a custodian to safe keep securities that the City buys. For a copy of a memo from the Director of Finance outlining the purpose of an investment custody a reement and a copy of the agreement, refer to pages 7e through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an agreement with First Trust for basic service to safe keep securities that the City buys. WIN MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VAN OVERBEKE DATE: JUNE 30, 1987 SUBJECT: INVESTMENT CUSTODY AGREEMENT As was noted in the recent management letter from Deloitte Haskins and Sells and highlighted in footnote number 3 of the annual financial report, the City is presenting a certain amount of risk with current investment practices. Given the nature of our investments as well as the depositories being used, I do not feel that there is any significant risk of suffering any losses within the customary economic environment. However, since the provisions of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board's Statement No. 3 requiring certain note disclosure about governmental entities' deposits with financial institutions are now effective, I feel we should take some steps to present less investment risk. I am therefore recommending that we have the City Council authorize the execution of the attached Custody Agreement with First Trust. We would in effect be contracting with them to hold and safekeep the actual securities the City purchases. This arrangement reduces the loss potential even more because the City has easier and more direct access to the actual security in the event there is a problem with a specific financial institution. I am estimating that this service would cost approximately $10,000 per year which would be offset against interest earnings generated by these investments. I have not researched any other financial institutions since I expect the costs to be about the same and we have previously designated First Trust as the registrar/paying agent for City bond issues. Also enclosed is a memo I sent to Paul Hauge as well as a copy of his response. I guess I failed to make it clear as to what I was proposing as most of his responses relate to First Trust actually managing the portfolio and making investments. That is not under consideration at this time except to the extent that they may hold in an interest bearing account small amounts that,I have not directed them to wire out. The basic service being proposed is for them to safekeep securities that the City buys. Consideration of external verses internal portfolio management is a subject to be reviewed at a later date. If you would like additional information or if you would like to discuss this recommendation, please let me know. Finanof Director/City Clerk Enclosures EJV/j eh 21 CUSTODY AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the date set forth on the signature page and is by and between the undersigned principal ("Customer") and the undersigned affiliate of First Bank System (Custodian"), as agent for Customer. In consideration of the following provisions and agreements, Customer and Custodian agree as follows: (1) Appointment of Custodian. Customer appoints Custodian to provide custodial and other services described in this Agreement in connection with those assets delivered by Customer to Custodian from time to time and in connection with distributions and payments received by Custodian with respect to such assets. Custodian accepts such appointment. (2) Custodial and Other Duties. Custodian shall perform the following duties: (a) Custodian shall accept delivery of assets from Customer and and safely keep all such assets and all distributions and payments made with respect to such assets (collectively, "Assets"), and remit, distribute or deliver any Asset or the Assets pursuant to written instructions of Customer. Each periodic account statement prepared by Custodian for Customer shall serve as a receipt for any Asset delivered to Custodian by Customer during the period covered by such statement. (b) Custodian shall open and maintain an account in the name of Customer and all transactions involving Assets shall be recorded in such account. Custodian shall furnish Customer, as part of the services for which Custodian charges its basic fee hereunder, with periodic account statements (not less frequently than once every three months) reflecting all securities, investment and other transactions in the account during the month and opening and closing Asset holdings. The agreement reflected by this subparagraph is intended to satisfy the requirements of parts (a) and (c) of 12 Code of Federal Regulations 12.5 regarding notifications as to securities transactions. 30 (c) If instructed in writing, Custodian shall forward any orders of Customer to brokers or others with respect to the purchase or sale of (i) exempted or municipal securities (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (The "Act")), (ii) commercial paper; bankers' acceptances or commercial bills, (iii) securities involved in connection with Custodian's cash sweep program, (iv) if Customer is a plan subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended, any securities, and (v) any investments that are not securities (as defined in the Act) . (d) Custodian shall collect and receive all dividends, interest and other distributions with respect to the Assets, whether payable in cash or in kind, and shall credit them to Customer's account, subject to final payment. (e) Custodian shall forward to Customer all information it receives with respect to any of the Assets concerning redemption and stock rights that are exercisable at Customer's option, tender or exchange offers, class action lawsuits and other special matters and shall follow Customer's written instructions with respect thereto. (f) Absent specific written investment instructions to the contrary from Customer, Custodian shall handle all cash and all checks and drafts (when collected funds are received) received from or for Customer in the manner designated below by Customer: Leave uninvested and deposit as a general deposit with Custodian or any bank affiliate of Custodian. Customer acknowledges that Custodian shall have no obligation to pay interest on such general deposit. Invest via Custodian's daily Cash Investment Service in the following investment: Customer acknowledges receipt of information describing Custodian's Cash Investment Service and the fees charged with respect thereto, i.e., Custodian Publication No. CM1986A. (g:) Unless ccntrary written instructions are received, Custodian shall forward to Customer all proxy material it receives with respect to -securities included among the Assets; Custodian shall follow blanket or specific written instructions from Customer with respect to the voting of proxies; in the absence of instructions, no voting of proxies shall be undertaken by Custodian. 31 (h) Absent specific written instructions to the contrary from Customer, Custodian shall not disclose to any issuer of securities included among the Assets any information about the identity or address of Customer or its securities position. (i) If instructed in writing by Customer, Custodian shall determine all questions regarding allocations between income and principal with respect to specific Assets. (j) If Customer appoints an investment adviser and notifies Custodian in writing of such appointment and the extent of the adviser's authority and represents in writing that under any governing instrument with respect to the Assets it has the power and authority to appoint such investment adviser and delegate such authority, Custodian shall follow the written instructions of such adviser that are consistent with such delegation until advised in writing by Customer that the authority of such adviser has been changed or revoked. (3) Powers of Custodian. In the performance of its duties hereunder, Custodian shall have the following powers: (a) To register any of the Assets in the name of Customer or in Custodian's name or in the name of a nominee of Custodian or any Affiliate of the Custodian or in the name of the Custodian's Agent Bank or to hold any of the Assets in unregistered form or in such form as will pass title by delivery, provided that such Assets shall at all times be recorded in Customer's account hereunder as one of the Assets. (b) To make, execute, acknowledge and deliver any and all documents of transfer and conveyance and any or all other instruments that may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the duties described and powers granted herein. (c) To maintain qualifying Assets in a Federal Reserve Bank or in any registered clearing agency (including, without limitation, the Depository Trust Company) as Custodian may select, and to permit such deposited Assets to be registered in the name of Custodian or Custodian's agent or nominee on the records of such Federal Reserve Bank or such registered clearing agency or a nominee of either. (d) To act on oral instructions which Custodian reasonably believes to be issued by Customer or an authorized agent thereof, unless Customer has notified Custodian in writing not to accept oral instructions from any, or from specified, persons, provided that Custodian shall -send Customer a written confirmation of any such oral instruction and such confirmation shall be deemed binding on Customer if not promptly objected to. Periodic account statements from Custodian reflecting a transaction shall be deemed to be a written confirmation of oral instructions concerning such transaction. 3 (e) To employ agents and to delegate duties to them as it sees fit and to employ or consult with experts, advisers and legal counsel (who may be employed also by Customer) and to rely on information and advice received from such agents, experts, advisers and legal counsel. (f) To perform any and all other acts deemed by Custodian necessary or appropriate to the proper discharge of its duties hereunder. (4) No Discretionary Authority; Standard of Care. Customer and Custodian acknowledge that, except to the extent set forth in any separate instrument signed by the parties with respect to this Agreement, Custodian's duties hereunder do not include any discretionary authority, control or responsibility with respect to the management or disposition of any Asset; that Custodian has no authority or responsibility to render investment advice with respect to any Asset; and that Custodian is not a fiduciary with respect to Customer (unless expressly made so by statute or government regulation). In addition, it is agreed that: (a) Custodian shall have no duty to make any evaluation or to advise anyone of the suitability or propriety of Customer's action or proposed action in any particular transaction involving an Asset or the suitability or propriety of retaining any particular investment as an Asset. (b) Custodian shall not be liable for any loss or diminution of Assets by reason of investment experience or for its actions taken in reliance upon an instruction from Customer. (c) Custodian shall have no duty or responsibility to monitor or otherwise investigate the actions or omissions of Customer. (d) Custodian shall only be responsible for the performance of such duties as are expressly set forth herein or in written instructions of Customer (or an authorized adviser pursuant to paragraph 2(1) hereof) which are not contrary to the provisions of this Agreement. Custodian shall exercise, in the performance of its duties, reasonable care and shall be liable for loss only when caused by its negligence, fraud.or willful misconduct. (5) Compensation and Exnenses. Custodian shall be paid for its services hereunder and reimbursed for its reasonable expenses in 33 connection with the rendering of such services and Customer authorizes Custodian to bill/charge its account hereunder for such services and expenses, as often as monthly. Fees for the services shall be according to Custodian's fee schedule, as it may be changed from time to time or shall be as otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties from time to time. (6) Term. This Agreement may be terminated by Customer or Custodian by mailing of written notice to that effect by the terminating party to the other party, such termination to be effective thirty (30) days after mailing of such notice, unless such thirty -day period is waived by the party receiving such notice, in which case the effective date of termination shall be the date agreed upon by the parties. (7) Amendment. This Agreement may be amended at any time but only by the written agreement of the parties hereto. (8) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. (9) Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and insure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3� ti IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of Date of Signature 19 3-5 FIRST TRUST COMPANY, INC. By Its Its Date of Signature 19 M MEMO TO: CITY ATTORNEY HAUGE FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR VAN OVERBEKE DATE: JUNE 17, 1987 SUBJECT: INVESTMENT CUSTODY AGREEMENT I have recently met with representatives of First Trust to review the custodial services they provide relative to investment of City funds. Given the increased attention to security as well as increased reporting requirements, I believe that it is in the City's best interest to engage the type of services being offered by First Trust. I will be making that recommendation to Tom and the City Council, hopefully at the first meeting in July. Would you please review the attached copy of the agreement to provide assurance that it is legally sound for the City. Please let me know if you would like any additional information or would like to discuss the matter in more detail. FinancV irector/City Clerk EJV/j eh J� r HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. -ttorneys at cnnaw TOWN CENTRE PROFESSIONAL BLDG., SUITE 200 1260 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123 (612) 456-9000 June 25, 1987 Gene VanOverbeke Eagan City Clerk 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Investment Custody Agreement Dear Gene: PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN DEBRA E. SCHMIDT I am responding to your note of June 17, 1987 in respect to the letter from First Trust Company dated December 18, 1986 and a draft Custody Agreement attached to that letter. The following are some reactions and comments: 1. I can appreciate that the increased requirements for reporting that are imposed upon municipalities, makes a centralized management service desirable if the service offers accounting that is adequate for at least part of the reporting requirements that are necessary to be filed. I assume that you have seen the system being used by the bank, although I noticed that Mr. Spies has suggested that you visit the bank to review the methods used for reporting purposes. 2. Most of my comments are simply of a practical nature and most of which you have already considered, including whether other quotes and proposals were solicited from other management institutions. I have not reviewed the issue carefully but can only assume that this is similar to a fee consulting service and therefore, the City Council need not solicit formal bids for the agency relation. 3. It is also my assumption that only a portion of the City funds and other investments will be kept at First Bank, which, according to the agreement, is an independent third party, and an agent .for the City. In that respect, the agent of course, has certain fiduciary duties, even though it states in paragraph 4 that it is not serving in a fiduciary capacity. 4. The fee schedule is controlled by paragraph 5, which of course, can be changed from time to time and in the event that the City is not pleased with the service, or it feels that the fee is excessive, it of course, has a right to cancel with a 30 day written notice. The problem at that time is that certain of the investments and securities may be held in the name of First Trust and would take some time to be shifted to another management account. 37 a Gene VanOverbeke June 25, 1987 Page 2 5. Paragraph 2.b. indicates that there will be only a single account, but presumably that is for a specific purpose and other types of investments and securities of course would be held independently. 6. The same paragraph 2.b. also indicates that the account statements will be made, not less frequently than once every three months, but it would appear logical that the City would request statements, perhaps at least monthly, which should include the rate of return, including interest, on the accounts being held. 7. Paragraph 2.f. indicates that all cash and all checks and drafts will be held in a general deposit and that the bank has no obligation to pay interest on such general deposit. It was my understanding that the purpose of the deposit is that the bank would offer an interest-bearing account, even on a daily basis, and if so, that sentence should be changed. 8. As to paragraph 3.e., it would seem desirable that the City should give consent to the bank, if it intends to consult with experts, advisers and legal counsel, rather than to give the bank the open ended right to do so on its own. 9. The word "insure" in paragraph 9, should be "inure" which is simply a typo. 10. I assume that you have checked the track record of First Trust as a manager for funds and securities for other municipal bodies and presumably, the bank has a record of the rate of return that it has received for comparable kinds of investment services. One advantage, of course, of this type of service is that it is easy to back out of it if the City is not satisfied with the service. PHH:ras fVery truly yours, / .7 /HAUGS, EIDE & K ER, P.A. -az " Paul H. Hauge Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE O. Approval of Records Retention Schedule --The Minnesota Department of Administration in conjunction with the League of Minnesota Cities has developed a general records retention schedule for all cities. This schedule lists minimum retention periods for city records based on their administrative, fiscal, legal and historical value. The City's Finance Director/City Clerk would like the City Council to approve a resolution "Adopting General Records Retention Schedule." For a copy of a memo and the resolution refer to pages through "' ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution entitled "Adopting General Records Retention Schedule" as presented. 3% MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VAN OVERBEKE DATE: JUNE 30, 1987 SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE Over the past few years, the Minnesota Department of Administration, the League of Cities and a task force made up of city officials from around the state developed a general records retention schedule for cities. That schedule which is attached lists minimum retention periods for city records based on their administrative, fiscal, legal and historical value. The schedule lists types of records common to cities and states how long to keep them. Adoption of a records retention schedule is not mandatory, however, I feel that it is the appropriate first step in improving our records management system. Even though the City may not have all the records listed on the schedule, I am recommending that it be adopted in total. I have also attached a proposed resolution for City Council action. There are a number of other issues that will need to be addressed as we move toward implementation. My goal is to begin the process this summer. Please let me know if you would like any additional information or if you would like to discuss this request in more detail. �� 0 Finan Director/City Clerk cc: Administrative Assistant Witt 4 EJV/jeh Attachments Ell CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION ADOPTING GENERAL RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 138.17 requires the approval of the attorney general, state auditor, and director of the Minnesota Historical Society before any officer or agency of the state or any county, city, town, school district, municipal subdivision or corporation, or other public authority or political entity within the state can dispose of any governmental records. AND WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Administration and a task force made up of city officials from around the state have developed a general records retention schedule for cities which has been approved by the attorney general, state auditor, and director of the Minnesota Historical Society. AND WHEREAS, the classification of records as herein described is included in the above mentioned Records Retention Schedule. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Eagan City Council does hereby adopt the general records retention schedule as attached hereto. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be submitted along with the Notification of Adoption of City General Retention Schedule form to the Government Records Archivist. Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CERTIFICATION CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1987. !Z/ Finance Director/City Clerk Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 MINNESOTA POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM P. Appointments to Minnesota Police Recruitment System --The City has received a letter from the Minnesota Police Recruitment System, stating that the director is Martin DesLauriers and alternate director Jay Berthe. Since these appointments are outdated, it is recommended by the Chief of Police that the director be the Eagan Chief of Police and the alternate director be the Eagan City Administrator. This allows a title rather than an individual's name to be appointed to the Minnesota Police Recruitment System board of directors representing the City of Eagan. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint the Chief of Police as the director and the City Administrator as the alternate director to serve as members of the board of directors of the Minnesota Police Recruitment System on behalf of the City of Eagan. T� Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 PROJECT 513 RECEIVE PETITION ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT (BRITANNY 10TH ADDITION - TRUNK WATER MAIN) Q. Project 513, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Britanny 10th Addition - Trunk Water Main --The staff has received a petition from Tollefson Builders, Inc. requesting the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of a 16" trunk water main through the Britanny 10th Addition to its connection with the existing trunk water main in the Hillcrest Addition in compliance with the condition of the preliminary plat approval. All costs have been guaranteed if the project is not approved at the time of the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the feasibility report for Project 513 (Britanny 10th Addition - trunk water main). JA;Z Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 PROJECT 504, RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING R. Project 504, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Whispering Woods 2nd Addition - Storm Sewer) --In response to a petition submitted by the developer of the Whispering Woods 2nd Addition, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of the storm sewer system along Storland Road. This feasiblity report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 504 (Whispering Woods 2nd Addition - Storm Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held on August 4, 1987. PROJECT 450, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER-PUBLIC HEARING S. Project 450, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Williams and LaRue Addition - Utilities) --The installation of sanitary sewer to service the Williams and LaRue Addition has now been completed, final costs tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is now being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to discuss these proposed final assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 450 (Williams and LaRue Addition - Utilities) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be held on August 4, 1987. PROJECT__464, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING T. Project 464, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Wyndham Corporate Center - Streets and ,Utilities) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Wyndham Corporate Center and adjacent properties have now been completed, final costs tabulated and the preparation of the final assessment roll completed. This roll is now being presented to the Council in consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to discuss these final costs. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 464 (Wyndham Corporate Center - Streets and Utilities) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be held on August 4, 1987. 4 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 PROJECT 487 BRAUN COURT STREETS AND STORM SEWER A. Project 487, Braun Court - Streets and Storm Sewer --On June 2, the Council received the revised feasibility report for the installation of Braun Court and related storm sewer facilities and scheduled a public hearing to be held on July 7. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected Mprgperty owners in orming of this public hearing. Enclosed on pages _ through 115S is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. There have been several collective and individual neighborhood meetings with the affected major property owners and the revised feasibility report represents the consensus of agreement of both Braun families. However, there may be objections from Henry Braun regarding the method of assessing a portion of the storm sewer costs. The staff firmly believes that no further neighborhood meetings will help to resolve any disagreements or objections to the proposed feasibility report and strongly encourage the Council to approve the report as presented or amend it accordingly if the project is to be approved. The consulting engineer responsible for the report preparation will discusss the project in detail and answer any questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify/deny Project 487 (Braun Court - Streets and Storm Sewer) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detail plans and specifications. �y REPORT f l' 0 R BRAUN COURT STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 487R EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE NO.49408 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA m Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. ■ 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers & Architects St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 May 22, 1987 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Braun Court Street Improvements Project No. 487R Our File No. 49408 Dear Mayor and Council: Otto G. Bonestrou, P.E. Robert W. Rosette, P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner,P.E. James C. Olson, P. E. Glenn R. Cook, P.£. Keith A Gordon. P.1: -/.) o ui L, Noyes. 11.1:. Richard W. Foster, P.E. Robert G.Schunecht. P.E. Marvin L. Survala, P.E. Donald C. Burgardt. P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Murk A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael Z Ruuunann, P.E. Robert N. PJrJJerle, P.E. David O. L-kota, P.E. Thomas W Peterson, P.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. Willis, P.E. James R. Ataland, P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. Keith A. Bachmann. P.E. Mark R. Rolls, P.E. Robert C. Russek, A./,A. Thomas E. Angus, P.E. Scwr L. Young, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo AL. Puivelsky Harlon M. Olson Susan U. £berlin Attached is our revised preliminary report for the subject project. The re— port addresses revisions to the proposed method of assessment and construction items as requested by the property owners. We would be pleased to meet with the council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. i Thomas E. Angus TEA:li I hereby certify that this report'was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws o S ate of Minnesota. Thomas E. Ang Date: May 22, 1987 Reg. No. 12393 Approved by: "t-164 Department of Pub is Works Date: 6 —k —if 7 3990e L�7 SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of a new street, Braun Court, along the north side of Braun Sunrise Addition and west from Drexel Court. The proposed improvement would include grading and construction of a cul-de-sac to City of Eagan residential street standards with concrete curb and gutter and bituminous paving. The preliminary report for Braun Court, Project No. 487 was presented to the City Council at their January 20, 1987 council meeting. The public hear- ing was held February 17, 1987 and continued at that time to March 17, 1987 at which time it was continued again to allow staff time to meet with affected owners to further evaluate their concerns relative to method of assessment of storm sewer and street improvements. As result of these additional meetings, this revised preliminary report was prepared for the Council's consideration. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plan for the City of Eagan. DISCUSSION: The area to be served by the cul-de-sac has access to Pilot Knob Road from a private driveway. Because of the proposed improvements to Pilot Knob Road, it has become desirable to limit access to Pilot Knob Road and pro- vide a new access to Drexel Court from the area. For this project, it is proposed to construct Braun Court to a 28' wide bituminous street and a 40' radius cul-de-sac with concrete curb and gutter. As part of the project, it is proposed to provide five additional sanitary sewer and water services to areas abutting the cul-de-sac for future lot de- velopment. Storm sewer is also proposed to provide drainage from both the cul-de-sac and a low area south of the cul-de-sac. 3990e Page 1. Borrow material will not be required for the project to complete the grad- ing of the street assuming 3:1 slopes are maintained from the property lines in cut areas. EASEMENTS: A drainage and utility easement exists over the north 30' of Braun Sunrise Addition. Street right-of-way over the same 30' adjacent to Lot 2, Block 1, and a 55' diameter half cul-de-sac along with 25' half right-of-way west of Lot 2, Block 1 is proposed to be acquired from Lot 1, Block 1 of Braun Sunrise Addition. It is proposed to acquire a 25' street right-of-way and a 55' diameter half cul-de-sac over Parcel 010-52 of the SW 1/4 of Section 15. Permanent drainage and utility easements will need to be acquired for the storm sewer. Temporary construction easements will be required for construc- tion of slopes, services and storm sewer. The estimated amount of right-of- way and easements required from each parcel is listed below: Parcel Description BRAUN SUNRISE ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 SW 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 010-52 TOTAL............... Drainage & Util. Right -of -Way Easement (Acres) (Acres) 0.30 0.30 0.60 0.01 0.03 0.04 Temporary Construction Easement (Acres) 0.02 0.30 0.32 COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and is summarized below: Street Services $36,030 9,040 Storm Sewer 8,190 TOTAL .................. $53,260 Page 2. 3990e T The total estimated project cost, $53,260, includes contingencies and all related overhead but no easement acquisition costs. Overhead costs are esti- mated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final costs. The assessments will be spread over a period of 15 years. The interest rate will be based upon the bond sale necessary to finance this public improvement. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Construction Area BRAUN SUNRISE ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 SW 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 010-52 Assessment Area BRAUN SUNRISE ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 SW 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 010-52 Parcel 030-52 SW 1/4, SECTION 16 Parcel 040-79 DREXEL HEIGHTS ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 STREET: It is proposed to assess the street costs equally on a lot equivalent basis for six potential lots. The number of lot equivalents is ;based on ac- cess to the proposed cul-de-sac and number of buildable lots as determined by adjacent property owners. STORM SEWER: Based on a meeting with property owners along Braun Court, it was agreed to assess 50% of the storm sewer in the same manner as the assess- ments for the street. The remaining storm sewer cost is proposed to be as- sessed on an area basis against the drainage area that contributes to the low Page 3. 3990e -'0 area within Braun Sunrise Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. It is proposed to provide an outlet for this low area to Fish Lake by extending storm sewer south from the cul-de-sac. SERVICES: It is proposed to assess the service costs equally on a per lot basis to the existing parcels incorporating the benefiting proposed lots. The number of services is based on the number of lots that are proposed to be de- veloped by adjacent property owners. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are esti- mated to be as follows: STREET Project Cost Revenue Balance Street $36,030 Assessment $36,030 $36,030 $36,030 - 0 - SERVICES Services $ 9,040 Assessment $9,040 $ 9,040 $ 9,040 - 0 - STORM SEWER Storm Sewer $ 8,190 Assessment $ 8,190 $ 8,190 $ 8,190 All costs for this project are proposed to be assessed, therefore, there is no financing required from the City. Page 4. 3990e REVISED PROJECT SCHEDULE Present "Revised" Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 5. 3990e June 2, 1987 July 7, 1987 July 21, 1987 August 18, 1987 October 15, 1987 Winter, 1988 May, 1989 13 APPENDIX A REVISED PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE BRAUN COURT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 487R A. STREETS LUMP SUM Clear and grub @ $1,000.00/L.S. $ 1,000 LUMP SUM Remove 18" apron & seal 18" RCP/L.S. 300 1,500 Cu.yds. Common excavating @ $2.50/cu.yd. 3,750 50 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $5.00/cu.yd. 250 50 Cu.yds. Aggregate backfill @ $7.00/cu.yd. 350 50 Lin.ft. Curb & gutter removal @ $2.00/lin.ft. 100 710 Ton Class 5, 100% crushed aggregate base @ $7.00/ton 4,970 40 Ton Class 5, 100% Crushed aggregate (driveway) @ $7.00/ton 280 145 Ton Bituminous base course @ $13.50/ton 1,958 145 Ton Bituminous wear course @ $15.50/ton 2,250 7 Ton Bituminous wear course (driveway) @ $17.00/ton 119 18 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $150.00/ton 2,700 80 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 120 1,000 Lin.ft. Surmountable concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 5,000 3 Each Manhole Adjustment @ $200.00/each 600 1 Each Gate valve adjustment @ $100.00/each 100 900 Sq.yds. Sodding @ $2.00/sq.yd. 1,800 0.5 Acre Seed w/fertilizer & mulch @ $1,500.00/Ac. 750 Total $26,397 +5% Contingencies 1,320 $27,717 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 8,313 TOTAL STREETS ...................................... $36,030 Page 6. 3990e S3 B. SERVICES 5 Each Connect to existing sewer @ $300.00/each $ 1,500 30 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Risers @ $12.00/lin.ft. 360 210 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sewer service @ $7.00/lin.ft. 1,470 230 Lin.ft. 1" Copper water service @ $8.00/lin.ft. 1,840 5 Each 1" Corporation stop @ $150.00/each 750 5 Each 1" Curb stop @ $75.00/each 375 10 Cu.yds. Improved pipe foundation @ $10.00/cu.yd. 100 230 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 230 Total $ 6,625 +5% Contingencies 331 $ 6,956 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 2,084 TOTALSERVICES ..................................... $ 9,040 C. STORM SEWER 200 Lin.ft. 12" RCP storm sewer @ $19.00/lin.ft. $ 3,800 2 Each 12" RCP apron w/T.G. @ $500.00/ea. 10000 1 Each Std. CBMH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/ea. 1,000 200 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 200 Total $ 61000 +5% Contingencies 300 $ 6,300 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 1,890 TOTALSTORM SEWER ................. v ...... ......... $ 8,190 Page 7. 3990e jy APPENDIX B REVISED PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BRAUN COURT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 487R A. STREET Parcel Lot Equiv. Assessment Total Description (L.E.) Rate/L.E. Assessment BRAUN SUNRISE ADDITION Parcel 010-52 4 Lot 1, Block 1 2 $6,005 $12,010 Lot 2, Block 1 1 6,005 6,005 SW 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 010-52 3 $6,005 $18,015 TOTALS ..................... 6 $36,030 B. SERVICES BRAUN SUNRISE ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 1 $1,808 $ 1,808 SW 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 010-52 4 $1,808 $ 7,232 TOTALS ....................... 5 $ 9,040 C. STORM SEWER a. Assessments based on lot equivalents (50% of storm sewer project cost). BRAUN SUNRISE ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1� 2 $ 683 $ 1,365 Lot 2, Block 1 1 683 683 SW 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 010-52 3 $ 683 $ 2,047 TOTALS ...................... 6 $ 4,095 Page 8. 3990e b. Assessments based on drainage area (50% of storm sewer project costs). Parcel Area Assessment Description (Sq.ft.) Rate/Sq.ft. BRAUN SUNRISE ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 70,110 $0.041 DREXEL HEIGHTS ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 4,435 $0.041 SE 1/4, SECTION 16 Parcel 040-79 5,790 $0.041 SW 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 030-52 20,205 $0.041 TOTALS ...................... 100,540 0 Page 9. 3990e 4 Total $ 2,855 $ 181 $ 236 823 $ 4,095 REVISED SUMMARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BRAUN COURT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 487R Parcel Description Street BRAUN SUNRISE ADDITION Storm Sewer Services Lot Equiv. Area Lot 1, Block 1 $1231010 $ 1,808 Lot 2, Block 1 6,005 DREXEL HEIGHTS ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 SW 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 010-52 $18,015 $ 7,232 Parcel 030-52 SE 1/41, SECTION 16 Parcel 040-79 TOTALS ......... $36,030 $ 9,040 3990e Page 10. 7 $10365 $ 2,855 683 $ 181 $2,047 $ 823 $ 236 $4,095 $ 4,095 Total Assessment $18,038 6,688 $ 181 $27,294 823 $ 236 $53,260 OREk �� E� HF,GNTS 1 -4DD1T1ON �Q RF NQ Gf p� \p� ST V BS SpHOpOs \. SF,RM ED FR � BRAUN SUNK I S-Q�DI r/D pRpp 11 0/0 `♦� `� f" opOSF �Typ Rl��r COT k • �Rr V- 4 1,7"rps) 3 R` f °"° _ T —,� / 9 M i/j pRp D&/v, q D 0 100 SCALE IN FEET BRAUN COURT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 487 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 5Y NA h BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date:Jan..1987 Comm. 4 9 4 0 8 11 Fig. No. 1 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 PROJECT 496, BRITTANY 10TH ADDITION/STORM SEWER B. Project 496, Brittany 10th Addition - Storm Sewer --On June 2, the Council received the feasibility report for the installation of trunk storm sewer facilities within the Brittany 10th Addition and scheduled a public hearing to be held on July 7. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. Enclosed on pages 1,6 through is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. The consulting. engineer will discuss in detail the proposed improvements and answer any questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 496 (Brittany 10th Addition - Storm Sewer). 6� FOR. BRITTANY 10th ADDITI®N (POND LP -6 and POND LP -57 OUTLET) CITY PROJECT No. 496 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1957 t FILE Na 49415 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. O 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 June 2, 1987 Engineers & Architects Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Brittany 10th Addition Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 496 File No. 49415 Dear Mayor and Council: Ono G. Bonestruo, P.E. Robert W. Rosene. P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lemberg, P.E. Richard E. Turner. P.E. James C.Ohon, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Aeith A. Gordon. P. ti. 7'humus E. Noyes. P.1�. Riuhurd W. Foster. P.E. Robert G. Schumcht. P.E. Marvin L. Survalu, P.E. Donald C. Burgardt. P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Ted K. Field, P.E. Michael T. Ruutmmm, P.E. Robert R. PJcyJerlr, P.E. Ouvid O. Luskolu, P.L•'. Thomas W. Peterson, P.L. Michael C. Lynch, P. E. Karen L. Willis, P.E. James R. Maland, P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. Keith A. Bachatann, P.E. Murk R. Roljs. P.E. Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. Thomas E. Angus, P.E. Scutt L. Young, Y.S. Charles A. Erickson Leu M. Puwelsky Hurlun M. Olson Susan U. Eberlin Enclosed is our report for Brittany 10th Addition, Project No. 496. This re- port covers storm sewer improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSF E, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. �1 Mar. A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of tho St o' Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date:. June 2, 1987 T Reg, No. 14260 Approved by: _,/'4t_ Department of Public Works Date: � _i YJ f 4166e SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of storm sewer outlets for Ponds LP -6 and LP -57. Pond LP -6 and a portion of LP -57 are located to the north of Brittany 10th Addition while the western portion of Pond LP -57 is lo- cated within Beacon Hills. The outlet for these ponds are being required as part of the development of Brittany 10th Addition. The required easements will be provided with the platting of Brittany 10th Addition. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Storm Sewer Plan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Pond LP -57 receives runoff from Beacon Hills. The Comprehensive Storm Plan provides for a gravity storm sewer outlet from Pond LP -57 to Pond LP -6. However, because an easement could not be acquired as part of the Bea- con Hills development to construct the gravity outlet from Pond LP -57 to LP -6, a temporary lift station was constructed in Pond LP -57. The temporary lift station discharges through a force main into the open ditch of Cliff Road which in turn drains to Thomas Lake. With the development of Brittany 10th Addition, the gravity outlet for Pond LP -57 to LP -6 is required and will be located to conform with the property lines of a potential future development. The temporary lift station and force main will then be abandoned: The outlet for Pond LP -6 requires a lift station and force main discharging into an ex- isting 8" force main in Walden Heights which ultimately discharges into Thomas Lake. Similar to the gravity storm sewer between Pond LP -57 to LP -6, the lift station and force main will also be located to conform to property lines of a potential future development. Specific design considerations for Pond LP -57 and LP -6 are listed below: Page 1. 4166e Comp. Plan Proposed Storage Storage (ac.ft.) (ac.ft.) 99.9 104.5 10.9 6.3 Comp. Plan Proposed Outflow Outflow (cfs) (cfs) 3.0 3.0 36.3 50.0 As noted, the storage volume for Pond LP -57 is proposed to be reduced while the outflow has been increased. The HVL for Pond LP -6 has been revised and the storage volume increased to conform with the proposed grading of the future Brittany Additions and to accommodate the reduced storage in Pond LP -57. The outflow for Pond LP -6 has remained the same. EASEMENTS: The required easements for ponding, utilities, and access drive will be dedicated as part of the Brittany 10th Addition. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA NE 1/4. SECTION 33 Parcel 040-03 SE 1/4, SECTION 33 Parcel 011-76 COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $213,090, which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with easement acquisition. Overhead costs are estimated at 30 per- cent and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited prop- erty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. These assessments will be spread over 15 years at a rate of in- terest based upon the bond sale financing this project. Page 2. 416 6e 63 Comp. Pro- Comp. Pro - Pond Plan posed Plan posed Description NWL NWL HWL HWL Pond LP -6 892.0 887.0 907.1 910.5 Pond LP -57 911.0 911.0 918.0 918.0 Comp. Plan Proposed Storage Storage (ac.ft.) (ac.ft.) 99.9 104.5 10.9 6.3 Comp. Plan Proposed Outflow Outflow (cfs) (cfs) 3.0 3.0 36.3 50.0 As noted, the storage volume for Pond LP -57 is proposed to be reduced while the outflow has been increased. The HVL for Pond LP -6 has been revised and the storage volume increased to conform with the proposed grading of the future Brittany Additions and to accommodate the reduced storage in Pond LP -57. The outflow for Pond LP -6 has remained the same. EASEMENTS: The required easements for ponding, utilities, and access drive will be dedicated as part of the Brittany 10th Addition. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA NE 1/4. SECTION 33 Parcel 040-03 SE 1/4, SECTION 33 Parcel 011-76 COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $213,090, which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with easement acquisition. Overhead costs are estimated at 30 per- cent and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited prop- erty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. These assessments will be spread over 15 years at a rate of in- terest based upon the bond sale financing this project. Page 2. 416 6e 63 Trunk area storm sewer is proposed to be assessed to those areas which benefit from this project but have not been previously assessed. Storm sewer being constructed for this project is considered trunk except for the portion between Pond LP -57 to LP -6. Specifically, the line from the first manhole to Pond LP -6, will accommodate runoff from future land development and street im- provements. A 15" lateral benefit equivalent will be assessed at the time of development of Parcel 040-03. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Trunk $213,090 Trunk Assessment $257,404 $213,090 $257,404 +$55,244 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 3. 4166e June 2, 1987 July 7, 1987 E Spring/Summer 1988 May, 1989 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE BRITTANY 10TH ADDITION (POND LP -6 AND LP -57 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 496 LUMP SUM Remove berm and reshape east end of Pond LP -57 @ LS $ 5,000 LUMP SUM Remove existing Lift Station @ LS 1,000 50 Lin.ft. 42" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $50.00/lin,ft. 2,500 470 Lin.ft. ,30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $42.00/lin.ft. 19,740 2 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/casting @ $1,200.00/ea. 2,400 420 Lin.ft. 14" DIP inlet piping @ $28.00/lin.ft. 11,760 820 Lin.ft. 12" DIP force main @ $22.00/lin.ft. 18,040 LUMP SUM Submersible lift station @ $80,000.00/L.S. 80,000 1 Each 42" RCP flared end @ $2,000.00/ea. 2,000 1 Each 30" RCP flared end @ $1,500.00/ea. 1,500 12 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 1,200 1 Each Connect 8" DIP to existing 8" DIP @ $200.00/ea. 200' LUMP SUM Access drive @ $3,000.00/L.S. 3,000 4.0 Acre Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,500.._00/ac. 63,000 1,760 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,760 Total $156,100 +5% Contingencies 7,810 $163,910 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 49,180 TOTAL ............................................. $213,090 Page 4. 4166e APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BRITTANY 10TH ADDITION (POND LP -6 AND LP -57 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 496 TRUNK STORM SEWER Assessable Parcel Area Credit Area Total DescriEtion (sq.ft.) (sq -ft.) (sq.ft.) Cost/sq.ft. Assessment NE 1/4, SECTION.33 Parcel 040-03 6,042,680 Pond 405,110 4,510,060 $0.053 $239,033 Street 20% SE 1/4, SECTION 33 Parcel 011-76 433,290 Street 20% 346,630 $0.053 18,371 $257,404 4 Page 5. 4166e 6 SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BRITTANY 10TH ADDITION (POND LP -6 AND LP -57 OUTLET) PROJECT N0. 496 Parcel Storm Sewer Total Description Trunk Assessment NE 1/4, SECTION 33 Parcel 040-03 $239,033 $255,283 SE 1/4, SECTION 33 Parcel 011-76 18,371 18,371 $257,404 $273,654 Page 6. 4166e 6 *1 Fs; 9. CLIFF ROAD I 1 �`-'�� ' ` -- � - ' - -I ' -- � --_`1 �► POTENTIAL E�ISI�INC� FIORGE�MAIN, �� FUTURE ` 9 `--B.I=�B NDO NED ' +i i �_ _ DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED I I STORM SEWE9 ----; ;-----�------I �--'tom}----I r- -� _ i -----I i - --' PROPOSED ---I EXTSTING #RORAl-R-Y-- I OR CE MAIN _TA44ON T0' ---� ; BE R.EMOVM 1, i Ex. STORM --, `, ---- ---/ �„ SEWER f-� ---,- -% - 1 Y LP=6 -i4 892.0 I 200' 400' Scale in Feet 1 ; 1 r0: I L K ACCES _DRIVE PROPOSED BRITTANY IOTH ADDITION BRITTANY IOTH ADDITION TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT No. 496 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTR00, ROSENE, AHDERLlK & ASSOC., INC- DATE: JUNE 2, 1987 CONSULTING ENGINEERS COMM.: 49415 FIGURE St. Paul, Minnesota CLIFF ROAD i POND 892.0 910.5 SHIERIWOODI WAY BOKESTROO, RMNE, ANDERUK & ASSOC,, INC. CONSULT" EBWMERS / 1 St. t"l, mie"seta l,0 J J WALDEN HEIGHTS 0 200' 400' Scala In Foal , OUTLOT A i ASSESSMENT AREA BRITTANY IOTH ADDITION TRUNK STORM SEWER ASSESSMENTS CITY PROJECT No. 496 EAGAN MINNESOTA DATE -JUNE 2, 1987 FIGURE Z COMM.- 49415 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 PROJECT 480, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK/STREET OVERLAY C. Project 480, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, Street Overlay (Item to be Continued) --On June 2, the Council received a feasibility report and scheduled a public hearing to be held on July 7 to discuss the proposed street overlay within the northern industrial park. However, notices were not able to be prepared and distributed in a time frame that would allow the public hearing to be held on July 7. Therefore, after a short introduction, the staff will recommend that the Council continue this item until August 4. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public hearing for Project 480 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Street Overlay) to August 4. PROJECT 499, CHAPEL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH - STREETS AND STORM SEWER D. Project 499, Chapel Hill Baptist Church - Streets and Storm Sewer (Item to be Continued) --On June 2, the Council received the feasibility report regarding the installation of streets and storm sewer for Chapel Hill Baptist Church Addition and scheduled the public hearing to be held on July 7. Due to an error in the published legal notice for the public hearing, the City Attorney is recommending that this hearing be continued until the July 21 meeting to allow proper renotification. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public hearing for Project 499 (Chapel Hill Baptist Church - Streets and Storm Sewer) to July 21, 1987. VACATION OF PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY/TECHNOLOGY CIRCLE E. Vacation of Public Street Right -of -Way for Technology Circle --On June 2, the Council received a petition requesting a vacation of the Technology Circle right-of-way that was platted with the Lone Oak lst Addition and scheduled a public hearing to be held on July 7. Enclosed on page is a copy of the subject right-of-way. The request for this acation is based on the proposed replatting of this area into the Cray 1st Addition which has received preliminary plat approval by Council action on June 16, 1987. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all agencies who may be affected by this vacation. As of this date, staff has not received any objections to this proposed action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of the Technology Circle public street right-of-way within the Lone Oak lst Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. rt 31 Zr•�iN — — --- IIti4�'" 10 LAND DESCRIPTION OF STREET TO BE VACATED If Technology Circle as dedicated by and delineated on LONE OAK, according to the recorded plat thereof; Dakota County, Minnesota. si 1i '40P-�, - %I Otte 1� 0� "�'{Y i``'. ;•�'aQ '' .^ = it 310 of S ♦ /4 v � -a---;-- _ _,OO , a o � � .:; ,;a, I►i�Y;��-1-------- :----------- ------ ---------- [_ is w A/�N` �•y { , %IlsriT4s°4't wlrzr+J�t \�o i� I - CP I le o 1 ----------- --- 0&;P -4 0r 'y f i O ix l �� aQa � , \ .i ''� t>9y-� -- - ��'{'i/ i 1•AS.1'f{0 '`r��1'� �:•:7N.Kj� • •S. �� � UU 1.`, • �l• I -"-.....:.. - 23.17 '-• ,(� •� I >t .. ,,� �� I 4 /` • : Am M41 • -�; ■, y_ r �.1 .-aMd%:: ' �' .�A• �/ Tim _ _t_' i_ __ ____ _!e!_.t0 _ __ _ _- - -R LNC N lR' IN, 7{' 1/�1 - , -'�_�- ♦ (1� / J f .'-____________________________- / s:c 1, iZl, R27 Rf Cep d • , O� I vD rtzi'� ��' .' Oe U �� 1/{ T>? Rte'' �a ; , 6 Qr�, T ,� ��rrLAND�� ,q�••il , . � ; ' lI. PPPPPP~= I � ` . �•� 1( / y'�. . ���� , T. ♦fit:`�1l. r S a""•` `' ¢ X11, ' p , v)y'Irs ----------- �.. 417.403 37-1 EA R 1 l ----- -� \ f 1 54697 -.----♦ / •,'� +' v 3E9.24N74*w1 1�1 . I I Asa 1 1o7aa{ , 0.5 1A M S[ Cet d 7A W, •— U—r ./—[ ,7AM� !w1231 N, "7y- —'� _ S = ,/-� 1J26.T1 _ SVVI {,c 1, Tt► 11 f/ ! Loki Ca I „ — — se9'2T4(YV 7 lW of 1[ Vt, !iyN. CAK AOSJ '� µ ;s (r� r - Z YJ K �� a w.3M `. T' Kon Ra LO E :I -OAK ROAD Agenda Information -Memo, July 7, 1987 PONDVIEW ADDITION/CLARIFIACTION OF RESTAURANT USE A. Pondview Addition for Clarification of Uses for Rocky Rococo Restaurant --The developers and owners of Lot 1, Pondview Addition are requesting consideration by the City Council to allow that site to be developed for a Rocky Rococo Restaurant. The Rocky Rococo Restaurant is considered a sit down restaurant and therefore could be classified as a Restaurant Class I, traditional restaurant. A Restaurant Class I is defined as "an eating facility where food is served to a customer and consumed by him while seated at a counter or table." A Restaurant Class II, fast food, is described as the majority of customers order food and are served their food at a counter and then take their food to a table or counter where it is consumed. However, a significant number may take their food outside to eat in an automobile or off the premises. The lot size for the Rocky Rococo Restaurant is 60,000 square feet while the building is 3,145 square feet with a seating capacity of 99. They are proposing on-site wine and beer sales, a drive-thru service and a pylon sign. The only action before the City Council is a clarification and definition of use as to whether a Rocky Rococo Restaurant meets the intended restaurant use for the Pondview Addition. If this use is consistent, various applications will be made for development of the restaurant once the final plat for Pondview is approved. Attached on page is a copy of a site location and picture of a Rocky Rococo Re taurant for City Council review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide a clarification regarding a Rocky Rococo Restaurant on Lot 1, Pondview Addition. [�/^Q�T•� - �. � ryF �RIC �PANeSTYLE. P.IZZA�-..�=r. Q Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 19$7 DISCUSSION REGARDING BARBECUE GRILLS MULTI -FAMILY DWELLINGS A. Discussion Regarding Use of Barbecue Grills on Decks/Balconies of Multi -Family Dwellings --At the June 16, 1987 City Council meeting, the City Administrator was directed to review regulations on barbecue grills and fire walls as a result of the Woodridge fire with the LMC, State Fire Marshal and legislative delegation. A review of the existing legislation with these agencies and legislative delegation will provide the proper background to determine whether any additional regulatory measures should be taken by the City Council or state legislature pertaining to barbecue grills and fire walls. The following is an account of data the City has collected through various telephone conversations and meetings to date regarding this issue. A meeting was held with Representative Seaburg, attended by Ken Southorn and Doug Reid to discuss the Woodridge fire and any potential legislation that could minimize the potential of a similar fire in the future. The State Fire Marshal was present for the meeting with Representative Seaburg and is suggesting that the legislature adopt a mass media safety and procedure campaign to educate residents on the hazards of combustible and noncombustible material. This would include the use and storage of charcoal brickets. Representative Seaburg is taking the State Fire Marshal's recommendation under advisement and will be giving further consideration to the issue. Enclosed on page -is a memo from Fire Chief Southorn regarding his meeting with Representative Seaburg which explains in more detail their discussion and any potential legislation. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein contacted the�League of Minnesota Cities and apparently the LMC has not taken a position to date but would encourage the City to bring 'the issue to the League legislative committee at its July 14 meeting, so the issue can become a part of their agenda. Administrative Intern Bruce Robertson has contacted several metropolitan municipalities for copies of ordinances that regulate barbecuing on balconies. There are a number of communities that do not have restrictions regarding barbecuing on balconies while other communities do have restrictions and for a sampling of ordinances from the cities of Brooklyn Park, St. Cloud, Plymouth Champlain, St. Louis Park, New Hope and Mound, refer to pages through Some ordinances are more Tho restrictive than others. To e cities who have ordinances prohibiting barbecue grills on apartment balconies report the following: 1. Enforcement is very difficult. Actual enforcement is on a complaint basis, instead of a fire marshal driving around inspecting balconies for violaters. �V Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 2. Apartment managers are told that breaking this ordinance is just cause to evict residents and it becomes a way to displace problem tenants. 3. Three cities have an ordinance that any violation entails a required court appearance and a fine up to the judge. 4. No storage of barbecue grills on apartment balconies is allowed so a fine could result without any actual use. 5. Some communities are concerned that charcoal brickets or wood chips can fall out of a grill onto a wooden deck or wind could blow sparks into an apartment causing a fire which has substantiated the need for a restrictive ordinance. The State Fire Marshal's office reports that the Fire Marshal is currently looking at the issue of barbecue grills on apartment balconies for possible legislation. However, the state is also dealing with the issue of enforcement and is considering a request that cities develop ordinances due to the fact that it would be impossible for the state to enforce the regulation of barbecue grills on apartment decks. The Fire Marshal's office is expecting proposed legislation because of the Woodridge fire. The City has received a memo from the City Attorney's office which addresses several issues related to barbecues on balconies or patios. Also enclosed on page(s)4-9/ �_ for Council review is a copy of a memo from the City Attorneys office which also summarizes the intent of the ordinances. Also enclosed on pages_ through__ are letters from residents that address the issue of regulat ng charcoal grills on apartment decks. In summary, the City Council may want to consider a directive to the City staff to prepare tips for safe barbecuing that could be enclosed in the City newsletter, written in City newspapers and prepared as a handout for all multi -dwelling units throughout the community. On a local level this would track with the' intent of Representative Seaburg and the State Fire Marshal. Regarding regulatory language to consider the total restriction of barbecue grills on apartment balconies, the City Council could request that the League of Minnesota Cities' legislative policy committee review statewide legislation as a part of their research beginning July 14. The LMC will certainly work with the State Fire Marshal's office to review any proposed legislation. Again, in summary, there are many options for the City Council to consider which include no action, a local blitz on safety tips for outdoor barbecuing, review of legislation on a statewide basis using the LMC and legislative delegation and finally, the possibility of a citywide ordinance at this time. These are all viable alternatives and should be discussed by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction to the City Administrator regarding any further consideration on the regulation of barbecue grills and decks/balconies of multi -family dwellings within the community. 7J6__" Fire Chief Southorn's memo regarding his meeting with Representative Seaberg will be distributed with the Additional Information packet on Monday. 13 MEMORANDUM TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN DATE: JUNE 23, 1987 SUBJECT: LMC POSITIONS ON BARBECUE GRILLS AND FIRE WALLS - WOODRIDGE FIRE Per our conversation, I spoke with Stan Peskar of the League of Minnesota Cities regarding any LMC position on barbecue grills in multifamily buildings or fire prevention features such as fire walls in those buildings. He indicated that the League has not taken a position to date, but that he would encourage the City to bring the issue to the League Legislative Committee at its July 14, 1987 meeting if we would like it to become part of their agenda. League Research Analyst Ann Houle has forwarded copies of several cities' ordinances to our office for our consideration. In addition, Administrative Intern Robertson requested copies of ordinances from several metropolitan municipalities. These are attached for your consideration. The common features of each are a definition of multifamily housing for purposes of the regulation, a distance requirement if barbequing is to be permitted on-site, definitions of prohibited fire sources and restrictions on the storage of flammable materials. Of the ordinances reviewed, the most comprehensive seem to be those like Brooklyn Park's which address all of these issues. However, the City of Edina has included a clause making it illegal to permit barbequing or the storage of flammable materials thereby allowing enforcement on the homeowner's association, property owner or manager. This would have the effect of causing building management enforce such restrictions as a matter of policy. Mr. Peskar stated, and I concur, that an ordinance absent support from legislation or the state building or fire codes would be of marginal effect. He suggested that we continue our fact finding as it relates to the fire and correspond with the League with a statement of our concerns and insights. I will draft such correspondence on your behalf after further discussions with Chief Building Official Reid and yourself. If you have any questions in the interim, please let me know. 0�, -, �,"k r _1 L - Administrative Assistant v V 5800 05th AVENUE NORTH / BROOKLYN PARI, MN. 55443 / 612-424-8000 TO: ALL APARTMENT/TOWNHOUSE/CONDOMINIUM COMPLEXES FROM: BROOKLYN PARK FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE: DECEMBER 23, 1986 SUBJECT: BARBECUES AND OPEN FLAME HEATERS On July 26, 1982, the City of Brooklyn Park passed a new fire ordinance. Several sections of the ordinance will effect apartment buildings directly. Section 225.110 Fires or Barbecues on Balconies or Patios. Subd. 1. In any structure containing two or more vertically stacked residential units, with vertical ly-stacked decks, no person shall kindle, maintain or cause any fire or open flame on any balcony above ground level, or on any ground floor patio immediately adjacent to or within 15 feet of any unit. Subd. 2. No person shal 1 store or use any fuel , barbecue,`torch or other similar heating or lighting chemicals or devices in either of the above places. Subd. 3. Natural gas fired barbecue grills which are permanently mounted, plumbed to the building's natural gas supply and maintaining a minimum clearance of sixteen (16) inches on the sides and back of the gri11 may be installed on balconies and patios. E Section 225.108 Open Flame Heaters Banned It shall be unlawful for any owner or occupant of any structure containing three (3) or more residential units to maintain in an operable condition or operate within a garage, whether attached or detached, used as an accessory use to such residential unit, the following: 1) An open flame -type heater or stove. 2) Welding or torch cutting equipment. 3) Any other equipment utilizing an open flame. WARNING ANY INDIVIDUAL USING OR ALLOWING THESE DEVICES THAT CREATES, CAUSES OR CONTRIBUTES TO ANY FIRE HAZARD, DAMAGE OR LOSS OF LIFE WILL BE PROSECUTED AND WILL BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES. Please convey this message to your occupants. If you have any questions, please call the Fire Prevention Bureau at 424-8000. Thank you for your cooperation. BARBECUE `- CITY OF ST CLOUD, MINNESOTA 56301 FIRE DEPARTMENT - TEL. 612/255-7213 May 11, 1987 SUBJECT: Barbequing on Balconies or Patios of R-1 Occupancies City Ordinance 1123, Uniform Fire Code (1982 Edition) prohibits the use of, or storage of any barbeque or any barbeque fuels, on R-1 occupancy balconies or within 15 feet of any unit of an R-1 occupancy. Section 11.117 Uniform"Fire Code (1982 Edition) - "FIRES OR BARBEQUES ON BALCONIES OR PATIOS: a. No person shall kindle, maintain, or cause any fire or open flame on any R-1 occupancy balcony above ground level or ground floor patio immediately adjacent to or within 15 feet of any unit. b. No person shall store any fuel, barbeque, torch, or other similar heating or lighting chemicals or device in either of the above conditions." Section 9.117 Uniform Fire Code (1982 Edition) - "DEFINITION OF R -I OCCUPANCIES: Hotels and apartment houses, convents and monasteries (each accommodating more than 10 persons), supervised living facilities class A-2." Section 9.110 Uniform Fire Code (1982 Edition) - "DEFINITION OF HOTEL: HOTEL is any building containing six or more guest rooms intended or designed to be used, or which are used, rented or hired out to be occupied, or which are occupied for sleeping purposes by guests." Section 9.103 Uniform Fire Code (1982 Edition) - "DEFINITON OF APART- MENT HOUSE: APARTMENT HOUSE is any building, or portion thereof, which contains three or more dwelling units." VIOLATION OF THIS PROVISION IS A MISDEMEANOR. Sylvester Adelman Fire Inspector gL/ EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ORDINANCE NO. 631 An Ordinance Prohibiting the Setting of Fires or Calling Out the Fire Department in Certain Cases, and Prescribing a Penalty. Sec. 1. Reporting Fires. No person shall willfully call out the lire department for any fire without just cause. Every person calling or phoning for the fire department shall give his name and address to the person receiving such call, which shall be recorded and turned over to the Village Clerk. S2*- L"51 —A I Sec. 2. �Ope lame Fire on Wooden Balcony. No person sha l sct, kindle, maintai any fire or open flame on any balcony of a multiple dwelling or apartment building in any barbecue,or similar heating, burning or lighting equipment or device, ex -t in dwellings or buildings of all masonry construction. ' !!, Sec. 3. Penalty. Any person violatin; any provision of this ordin., z shall upon conviction be fined not more than 5300 or imprisoned for not more than 90 days, and shall also be liable to pay the costs of prosecution. ORDINANCE NO. 631—A1 02: OP,DI:: \CE AMENDING O ,DINA"NCE NO. 631 TO PR0111BIT OPEN FL -*-%2; BA1,3ECUES UNDEK BALCONIES XND TO E.XE% PT FL" -57 -ENCLOSED BA,i3ECGES FRO TliE P::OVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 631 THE CITY COb.\CIL OF TEE CITY OF EDIVA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 631 is amended to read as follows : "No person shall set, kindle, maintain or permit any fire or open flame on any b3lcony or inurediately under any balcony of a multiple dwelling or apartment house in any barbecue, torch or sir-ailar heating, burning or liE.iting equipment or device except in dwellings or build- ings of all masonry. construction. This requirement sha 11 not restrict the use of an electr-ical or natural (methane) gas fired barbeque device of a design that permits complete flame enclosure when in operation." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. First Reading: February 4,' 1950 Second Reading: rebruary 25, 1980 -i Published in the Edina Sun on 31larch 5, 1980. i ATTEST: (sided) FLORENCE B. ilALLB7 \G City Clerk -_ 1 (signed) JAME3 Wu\ VALKENBURG Mayor MEMORANDUM DATE: APRIL 30, 1981 TO: ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL FROM: TED PAULFRANZ, ASSISTANT CHIEF SUBJECT: INTERPRETATION OF `BARBECUE ORDINANCE" No. 631-A1 The purpose and intent of this ordinance is to limit and restrict the us'e of: ---barbecues on or immediately under balconies of multiple dwellings or apartment buildings, (other than buildings of all -masonry construction), and ---barbecues involving the use of L,P,G., flammable or combustible liquids and/or charcoal briquets, and ---barbecue, lighting or torch device which permits open flames to escape when in operation. The ordinance is NOT intended to restrict the use of barbecues: ---in townhouses or single-family dwellings of any construction type ---in anything other than "apartment/condominium" occupancy groups ---of electrical or (methane gas) "Mi nnegasco-type" barbecues with covers. Fire experience with "barbecue -type" fires generally involve a combustizle, a balcony, siding or roof, and charcoal, flammable liquids and open flame. TRP/ rah 'e, P. 0/, WEST SAINT PAUL MUNICIPAL CENTER r 1616 HUMBOLDT AVE. y WEST SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55118-3972' PHONE: 455.9671 EMERGENCY: 911 TO: Multi -family Residential Property Owners Multi -family Residential Property Managers Multi -family Residential Caretakers Multi -family Residential Tenants FROM: West Saint Paul Fire Department Bureau of Fire Prevention SUBJECT: Amm ended City Uniform Fire Code BARBECUES ON BALCONIES AND PATIOS Please find specific references to City Fire Code pertaining to the above subject. We trust the intent and applicability is defined clearly, but should you have any questions or need clarification, please contact our office. It is our desire to provide 30 days upon receipt of this letter by you to comply with these provisions. Our recommendation would be to include this provision within your tenant lease agreements in order to eliminate any future misunderstandings. You may also want to consider the designation of a specific safe location on your complex where fixed community barbeques could be located and used by your tenants. Section 915 - Fire Prevention 915,0i. Fire PieVeilt 1 10'e- SubdiVls"O," 1. Uri 1form'Code•Adopted. The Uniform Fire Code, 1982 Edition, published by the International—Conference of Building Officials, as amended by 11 MCAR 1.5101 - 1.5156, in effect -December 31, 1982, is hereby adopted by reference and is, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 299F, the fire prevention code of the City.* A copy of the Uniform Code shall be marked "Official Copy" and kept available for public use in the office of the City Clerk. Fires or Barbecues'on Balconies or Patios 915.11, Subd. 7 Sec. 11.117 I. In any structure containing two or more vertically stacked residential units no person shall kindle, maintain, or cause any fire or open flame on any balcony above ground level, or on any ground floor patio immediately adjacent to or within fifteen feet (15) of any unit. 2. No person shall store any fuel, barbeque, torch, or other similar heating or lightingchemicals or device either of the above places. "%A l[rT e A II, IT 11 A 1 11 1r` A • 1 P/\1 I A / �nn�.. �-. .. .. �.. .. .. _. ... Page 2 Subject: Barbeques on Balconies and Patios 915.11, Subd. 11, Sec. 82.114 4. Use of liquefied petroleum gas on balconies or in multiple dwellings by tenants shall be prohibited. ARTICLE 3 - COMPLIANCE WITH ORDERS AND NOTICES Unlawful Continuance of Fire Hazard Sec. 3.101. Any person operating or maintaining any occupancy, premises or vehicle subject to this code who shall permit.any fire hazard to exist on premises under his control or -who shall fail to take immediate action to abate a fire hazard when ordered or notified to do so by the chief or his duly authorized representative shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. -.- Section 115 -- Penalties 115.01. General Rule. Any person who violates a provision of this Code is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof may be punished by a fine of not more than $500 and imprisonment for a term not to exceed 90 days, or both. Each act of violation and every day on which a violation occurs or continues is a separate violation. 115.09. Misdemeanor Defined. For purposes of this Code, the term "misdemeanor" means a pens offense or crime which the Council is empowered to punish with fine or imprisonment, and a petty misdemeanor as defined -by State Law. We encourage you to notify all tenants, caretakers or others who would be responsible for this requirement immediately and to post this notice at your premise. Legal effective date of this amendment to the Fire Code is June 18, 1984. June, 1984 n INFORMATION SERVICE Classification 5 League of Minnesota Cities1) s , 183 University Ave E. Municipality ) St. Paul, MN 55101 Date Q -j Subject City of Plymouth ORDINANCE NO. 94-23 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO PUBLIC SAFETY BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 905.19 OF THE CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF PLYMOUTH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOws: i Section 1. Subsection 905.19 of the Plymouth City Code is amended to I read as follows: "905.19. Fires or Barbecues on Balconies or Patios. Subdivision 1. In any structure containing two or more vertically stacked residential units no person shall kindle, main. tain or cause any fire or open flame on any balcony above ground level: or, on any ground floor patio im• mediately adjacent to or within 15 feet of any unit. Provided, however, that any such structure which con- tains two or more vertically stacked units and has ground floor patios and balconies that are constructed of noncombustible material on at least five of six sides, barbecues of the permitted type may be used. Barbecues aI the permitted type in. clude briquette, electrical and the I type described in subdivision 3 herein. t Subdivision 2. No person shall store 1 or use P66"6- L.P. fueled barbecue appli. ances in either of the above places. Subdivision 3. Natural gas fired barbecue grills which are per. manently mounted, plumbed to the building's natural gas supply and maintaining a minimum clearance of sixteen (16) inches on the sides and back of the grill may be in- sialled on balconies and patios." Section 2. This ordinance is effec. tive upon passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council the 171h day of September, 1984. David J. Davenport David J. Davenport, Mayor ATTEST: Laurie Houk Laurie Houk, City Clerk (Published in The Plymouth Post September 27, 1984) 7012 6 L INFORMATION SERVICE League of Minnesota Cities 480 Cedar Street Minnesota St. Paul, - CHAMPLI N STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ORDINANCE NO. 150 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING OPEN FLAME FIRES. THE CHAMPLIN CITY COUNCIL DOESORDAIN: 19-201 Open Flame Fires and Cooking Devices; Multiple Dwellings. No person shall set, kindle, maintain or permit any fire or open flame on any balcony of a multiple dwelling or apart- ment building of a multiple dwelling or apartment building in any barbecue, torch or similar heating, burning or lighting equipment or device unless such building be of Type 1 or Type 11 construction as defined in the Min- nesota State Building Code. 19.202 Definitions. A. "Cooking device" as used in this section means any*arbecue, rotisserie, roaster, oven or similar equipment used in food preparation. . B. "Open flame fire" as used In this section means any burning of fuel, and includes any torch, flare, decorative light, fondue or other heating, burning, or lighting equipment or device having an open flame. C. "Multiple dwelling" as used in this section means any residential structure other than a single-family family dwell- ing, including a hotel or motel, and In- cluding Type 1 and Type 11 construc- tion. 19-203 Prohibition. No person shall use, maintain, store or permit any cooking device or light, set or kindle any open flame fire on any balcony, platform, patio or deck exten- sion of a multiple dwelling of•two (2) or more stories including apartment building or hotel/motel. 19-204 Penalty Any person violating any provision of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a mis- demeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars (6500.00) or shall be imprisoned for a period of time not to exceed ninety (90) days, or both, plus the costs of prosecution In either case. 19-205 Separability. Should any section, subdivision, clause or other provision of this Or- dinance be declared by a court of com- petent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or of any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. This Ordinance shall be In full force and effect from and after its adoption end publication as required by laity. . Passed by the Champlin City Council this 23rd day of August, 1983. ---deletion --�addition Dale F. Winch, Mayor ATTEST: Doris A. Kemp, City Clerk -Treasurer Published In the Champlin' Dayton Press Thursday, Sept. 1, 1983. Classification No. Zz5 Municipality 44&,EISL�P� Date AUGQSz3,:1 �3 Subject W --L. R� s INFORMATION SERVICE Classification No.� League of Minnesota Cities Municipality. �a.. 480 Cedar Street , _ St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Date_ 77 Subject ' (Official Publication ORDINANCE NO. law / AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING ' OPEN FLAME FIRES AND COOK- ING DEVICES IN MULTIPLE DWELLINGS: AMENDING SEC- TION g -III OF THE ST. LOUIS PARI: ORDINANCE CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF ST. ' LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN: Sec. (.,Section 9-210 of the Sl. Louis Park Ordinance Code 1k ;mended to read: Open Flame Flrea • Section 9-210. Open Flame Fires and Cooking Devices; Multiple Dwel. .. lines. No person shall set, kindle,',-'_ maintain or permit any fire or op flame on any bacony of a multiple ' dwelling or apartment building in any ` barbecue, torch orsimilar heating, burning or lighting equipment or de- vice unless such building be of 7ypi I or Type D construction as defined In the Uniform Building Code adopted ` by Section 5:109 of the St. Louis Park i Ordinance Code.' (1) Definitions. (a) "Cooking device" as used in this section means any barbe.. que, rotisserie, roaster, oven or'. . similar equipment used in Jood preparation. (b) "Open flame Cue" a used in this section means any turning Of fuel, and includes any torch,'.:• flare, decorative light, fondue or - other beating, burn- or or ilght- log equipment or devke paving .. an open flame• (c) "Multiple dwelling" as used in this section means any re- - 1 sidential structure other,thao a f single-family dwelling, locluding J a hotel or motel, and including Type I and Type 11 construction. (2) Prohibition. No person shall I use, maintain, store or permit any crooking device or light, set or kindle 1 any Open flame Eire on any balcony, platform, patio or deck extension of a multiple dwelling of two or more i stories including apartment buikiing or hoteUmotel. Ordinance No. IM, amender Sea tion 8-210, adopted August 15, l9Tl. •" Section 9-211: Fire Rasards is f Places of Public Assembly. No room or other place of public assembly ' shall be decorated with paper or other combustible materials unless Much materials have been rendered arep. , roof. Sec. !. Penalty, Any raon violat- ing the provisions of this ordinance Shall be punished by a fine of not more than $M. by imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, or both. Sec. 2. Effective Date. This o dl- t nance shall take effect 15 days otter ; i Its publication. Adopted by the City Council August I5, 1977. (a) IRVING M. STERN f: Mayor Attest: (a) EARL E. RANSON r City Clerk '. •i Reviewed for administration: (s) DAVID RUDBEiW Acting an, MSW ...P ,... } Approved as to form G. ,t"� •� 'iv �r (a)WAYNEO.POPHAkt •.,� "'t•t+..'( City Attorney .r .r.• 11 ' (Aug. 111, 1977)—SIP.GV INFORMATION SERVICE OF Municipal Reference Bureau and League of Minnesota Municipalities, 314 Social Sciences Building, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 RRINANCE NO. N•Td q 't f AN.155 6 SECT1Oti � , 17 O THE WZ 6E CODE 'RELAUNG=TO CERTAIN O►EWFLAM4 I FIRES iH tAULTIFLE 11WELLIN" • .' I f1 vilbge of New Hope {. The Village Council of tllevulap New Hope ordains: :Section 1.'thapter t2 of)Q1- ge Code Ui V hereby amended d- %tng thereto•nc ection 12A5to d I !s follows- i !112.15 Open lames on Apart Balcony. y No person sball•*indla; maYltatn or pl!rmk y 1ltidrrpea..� flame on atblpcont abovi /qon1 level of 3' multiple Qielflak,. i apartment to any batbe=e;16onA, or other. similar "atiag, -lYraM s} ordightltlQ, }ppatp4ls%!?°� __o tlevtce." :� Section 2. Any 'person V011111109• e terms of this ordinanoe shall' 1 n' donVlction thereof,`be`•11is6i1'!�.'! m not to excee4.4IOO.00nor)0411' imprisoned .40r # _ period xceed 90 days. •r _•. j" . ! Section 2. ThWiartillsanee ilbah be n full force and''effect'trom::A.W tter its passage aadyubltltatlen. Passed by -the :VIIWe Camcil'of. e Village Pf New Hope lhls;, _14h.J day of March, 1968.1 `• M. C. HONSFY--,' j.�i ..:' Mayor. ! ATTEST:' C•` : i BETTY POULIOT . Clerk -Treasurer. < , (Published in The New .Hope -Ply- 1C'uth Post, April 4;,19t!). Classification No.�� Municipality G Date 3 t� D Subject INFORMATION SERVICE League of Minnesota Cities 480 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 i NOTICE OF ORDINANCE NO. 388 AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 7.90 TO TME C CITY CODE PROHIBITING FIRES OR BARSEOUES ON -BALCONIES The City of Mound does ordain: Setiylon 7.30 is hereby added to the City Coda and_ I shall read as follows: Section 7.30. Flee or Barbeques on Balconies Prohibited. No person shelf kindle, maintain, or pnnit j any fire or open flame on any balcony of any mutopl* dwelling or apartment In any barbeque, torch or ott►K similar burning or healing apparatus, aqulpmaftt or. device,. except In 1111006 buildings defined :tied` constructed as Type I or Type 11 construction. ` Violation of this ordinance shall be a mlKWMMW Eand violators shalt be subject to the penaltip set forth. In Section 71.09 of the City Code. •, . ' Tim LaVawn. Mays! r Attest: �... , Mary H. Marske, City park i Adopted by the City Council Sept. 19 1078. (Published In The Laker Sept. 27, 1078.) L AKER C7he :eP4 27"1878 110 .4 4 Classification No. 225 Municipality Mound Date September 19, 1978 Subject Sy' - HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. Atorneys at -nnaw TOWN CENTRE PROFESSIONAL BLDG., SUITE 200 1260 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123 (612) 456-9000 June 26, 1987 Mr. Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Barbecues on Balconies or Patios Dear Tom: PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN DEBRA E. SCHMIDT At the last City Council meeting, staff was directed to research alternative proposals for handling control of fires and barbecues on balconies and patios of multiple dwelling buildings. The following comments cover issues reviewed to date: 1. It is my understanding that Representative Art Seaberg has under advisement through the Minnesota House of Representatives, presumably through the revisers of statutes, a study of existing statutes that may control such devices and possible amendments to any existing statutes. We have not researched the Minnesota Statutes to determine what may be in existence at the present time. 2. We have contacted the League of Minnesota Cities, including Stan Peskar and Tom Grundhoefer and are told that the League has not pursued any state-wide action on the matter, but would be willing to consider a proposal if Eagan or any other City demonstrated an interest. ` 3. We have received copies of a number of existing Ordinances adopted by metropolitan area cities, including several that were available through the League of Cities. Generally, those ordinances read as follows: Open Flame Fires and Cooking Devices; Multiple Dwellings. 1. In any structure containing two or more vertically stacked residential units, no person shall kindle, maintain or cause any fire or open flame on any balcony above ground level, or on any ground floor patio immediately adjacent to or within 15 feet of the units. 2. No person shall store any fuel, barbeque, torch, or other similar heating or lighting chemicals or devices in either of the above places. �d Mr. Thomas Hedges June 26, 1987 Page 2 4. Some of the ordinances also include motels and hotels. Other ordinances allow heating, cooking and lighting equipment in a barbecue affixed to the balcony in a manner prescribed by the City Fire Chief and with an enclosed cover, while others provide for exceptions for all mansonry constructed buildings. Others allow barbecues that are permanently attached with screws and bolts to the deck or railing, and others allow natural gas fired barbecues on patios. Very truly yours, _,HA EIDE & KELLER, f. A. Paul H. Hauge PHH:ras 14 �15a-�s i3 __�. e . � � � �' .Awe ��?-u-^-r�_______�--_-_•._---._� _ �-_..___ � _�__ ij, -O._ a, —y `�°'�' -A� .,? !I - • s c I i ,1 :i i�._.,.—...._._-___,� --•-N`�'--'rn�'�-_ -�`�=` - /dij-L'"-e,It-^�cf,a.,c),�`"'"�%y�'`v_�''`.`1�%-,-�=`.f`y,!�o-c'._�._..._�h :�._. ! ' - ----- - ''T ' --'------�----- | ^ ���r ` �7 -' �---"'��r ----'------------�y'-u'�---------~----------- -----------~----'--'-~ 'y---~~~�v ^'--''---'--------�^--------~--�'~-~~-~--~--'~-v- - . ' O _ \_ �- ry v --_---�- -- --~-`----- '--- - '----------------- --=�'--�y--/ M Z ne- 4x,/o,'v4� & ,xd ----------- ----- 0i June 16, 1987 Eagan City Council c/o Mr. Torn Hedges P.O. Box 21-199 Eagan MN 55121 Re: Charcoal Grills David E. Robertson Apartment 326 3575 S. Lexington Ave. Eagan, MN 55123-1104 -Dear-CounciT, The local media has been reporting since yesterday evening that the council is going to consider an ordinance banning grills on balconies. I want to go on record as being opposed to any such regulation on either the local or state level. I am opposed to such an ordinance for a number of reasons. The recent fire was unfortunate and could have been caused by any number of factors. It is -my understanding that this fire was the result of spontaneous combustion and not directly to actual use of the grill itself. We recently had a major fire at the Duckwood Trail Apartments that was traced to a careless smoker. While there was extensive damage in that fire it was localized due to the fact that the fire walls held. From the pictures that I saw of the recent fire as well as what I could see when I went to the site, I am not so sure that this could be said in the more recent fire. Granted, the high winds make containing such a fire difficult at best but the Duckwood fire also experienced high winds. An ordinance such as has been mentioned in the media would be very discriminatory against apartment dwellers within the city who make up a substantial portion of the local population. If you are going to protect me from accidental and careless fire sources you may as well extend the ordinance to smoking, stoves (electrical and.gas included), electrical -wiring, all -flammable-mater-i-aTs;---and-windows- {spontaneous--combus-tion}-.--- - r .. I can appreciate the concern that may exist regarding outdoor grills. I purchased a LP gas grill for use on my balcony because I felt uncomfortable with an open charcoal fire. Gas has proven to be a safer alternative since fly ash is not a problem and I can more safely monitor and control the gas grill. Cool down is also much faster. This fact however only reflects my personal feelings and experience. I realize the fire in a Burnsville apartment that followed the next day involved a gas grill in spite of the fact that Burnsville has an ordinance against such activity. Banning grills will not solve the "problem° since it would be difficult to enforce and careless people would still find other ways to endanger their lives and the lives of their neighbors. _ Sincerely, P.S. If you elect to legislate my gas grill out of existence you are free to purchase it: Weber Gas Grill Storm Cover Bottle Fill q� 22.54 255.00 8.00 ORO Ra Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 SPECIAL USE PERMIT/TEMPORARY SIGNS FOR CENTURY 21 B. Special Use Permit for Century 21 for Two Temporary Signs on the Southeast Corner of Highway 13 and Blackhawk Road --An application was submitted by Century 21 requesting a special use permit to allow two (2) temporary signs on the southeast corner of Highway 13 and Blackhawk Road. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages through " ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special use permit as presented for the two (2) temporary signs. M CITY OF RAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: CENTURY 21 SOUTH COUNTRY REALTY (DON KLOBER) LOCATION: NW QTR OF SECTION 13 AT INTERSECTION OF HWY 13, ROBIN LANE & BLACKHAWK ROAD EXISTING ZONING: NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 7, 1987 - DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 29, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a special permit to allow two temporary pylon signs. The first sign is to be located at the intersection of Hwy. 13, Robin Lane and Blackhawk Road. The second sign is to be located at the intersection of Robin Lane and Blackhawk Road. The first pylon sign is to be located at the intersection of Hwy. 13, Robin Lane and Blackhawk Road and will have dimensions of 4' by 4' by 8' and consist of 32 sq. ft. The second sign located at the intersection of Robin Lane and Blackhawk Road will have dimensions of 8' by 9' for a total of 72 sq. ft. The applicant placed the signs at the above referenced locations approximately two to three months ago and is processing a special permit in response to City staff notification. If approved, the two pylon signs shall be subject to all applicable City ordinances. it q7 e��tti /j1,A z ley pmt. �i��-s leu` e if -2y — 1•, Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 VARIANCE/SETBACK FOR SNEDE C. Variance for James and Cheryl Snede for a 1.5' Side Yard Setback to Allow a 3.5' Setback in St. Francis Wood Addition --An application was submitted requesting a 1.5' side yard setback variance that would allow an addition to the existing garage to be situated 3.5' from the side yard property line at 1224 Tananger Court; described as Lot 10, Block 1, St. Francis Wood. For additional information on the variance request, refer to pages through /01--. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance as requested by James and Cheryl Snede. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: JAMES & CHERYL SNEDE LOCATION: LOT 10, BLOCK 1, ST. FRANCIS WOOD EXISTING ZONING: R-1 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 7, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 29, 1987 REPORTED BY: KENNETH ROBERTS, PLANNING INTERN APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a 1.5' side yard setback variance that would allow an addition to the existing garage to be situated 3.5' from the side yard property line at 1224 Tananger Court (Lot 10, Block 1, St. Francis Wood). PLANNER COMMENTS: The purpose for the 1.5' variance is to allow the construction of a third stall onto the present garage. This additional garage and driveway space will be used to help keep their cars off the street. The area into the easement will be triangular in shape with 1.5' being the maximum width of encroachment. It must also be noted that according to City code, no structure is to be built in the 5' utility easement without first having the necessary portion of it vacated through the public hearing process. /M 0 0 10. Ib" _— s _ 5 g4 OE�,GR.IP'reotl � I-O,r ial 6 L.04v- 1 RM -r Irl ,jT. FiL&W-V? W000i CA.ItaTP. GoWWT` ; AL1. gEAQIN44 A%OMFD Mtw1NESoTA c OEMoTF1,, 1Ro1! M01(UMOO I I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered •` Land Surveyor under the laws of the State oof Minnesota. Datet �une Zoe Le oy Bohlen V.4 Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795 /6 / 7.9 ,o QA4 ILE h LAV 1 �� V h1 b N -$Jt•-53 M f a, t. .1 Z O O 10. Ib" _— s _ 5 g4 OE�,GR.IP'reotl � I-O,r ial 6 L.04v- 1 RM -r Irl ,jT. FiL&W-V? W000i CA.ItaTP. GoWWT` ; AL1. gEAQIN44 A%OMFD Mtw1NESoTA c OEMoTF1,, 1Ro1! M01(UMOO I I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered •` Land Surveyor under the laws of the State oof Minnesota. Datet �une Zoe Le oy Bohlen V.4 Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795 /6 / Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 WAIVER OF PLAT/B.H. GRACE FOR DUPLEX LOT SPLIT D. Waiver of Plat for Duplex Lot Split on Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 5, Block 1, Rahn Ridge Addition --An application was received by the City from B.H. Grace Corporation for a waiver of plat requesting the division of two duplex lots located on Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 5, Block 1, Rahn Ridge lst Addition. For a copy of the City Planning Departmen report regarding the request for waiver of plat, refer to pages through D( . ACTION TO- BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat as requested for Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 5, Block 1, Rahn Ridge Addition. 105 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: B. H. GRACE CORPORATION LOCATION: LOT 4, BLOCK 2, AND LOT 5, BLOCS 1 RAHN RIDGE 1st Addition EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT R-2 (DUPLEX) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 7, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 29, 1987 REPORTED BY: KENNETH ROBERTS, PLANNING INTERN APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a waiver of plat requesting the division of two duplex lots located on Lot 4, Block 2, and Lot 5, BLock 1, Rahn Ridge 1st Addition. PLANNER COMMENTS: Lot 4, Block 2 is located along the east side of Vienna Lane and abuts duplex lots to the north and south. Sufficient utilities exist to meet the needs of the subsequent individual lots. Lot 5, Block 1 is located north of Pin Oak Drive and abuts duuplex lots to the west and east. Sufficient utilities exist to meet the needs of the subsequent individual lots. If these waivers of plat are approved, all other applicable City ordinances shall apply. /D� Hedlund Engineering Services 9201 East Bloomington Freeway Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Land Surveyors Civil Engineers Land Planners Phone: 888-0289 .� SmrsqorgsOrtificiate BOOK _ PAGE a� JOB NO. 87R-283 SURVEY FOR: B.H. Grace Corp. DESCRIBED AS: PARCEL A: That part of Lot 4, Block 2, RAHN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying northerly of a line drawn from a point on the east line of said Lot 4 distant 50.00 feet north of the southeast corner thereof,, to a point on the west line of said Lot 4 distant 50.00 feet north of the southwest corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. PARCEL B: That part of Lot 4, Block 2, KAHN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying southerly of a line drawn from a point on the east line of said Lot 4 distant 50.00 feet north of the southeast corner thereof, to a point on the west line of said Lot 4 distant 50.00 feet north of the southwest corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I hereby certify that on 5 / ! /87 I surveyed the property described above and that the above plot is a correct representation of sold survey. Jeffrey V/1-intl4ren, License No. 14376 East 92b.1 921.0 150.0p lSTORM SEWER 923.8 3o] -CB T L $uc°oto o f—��r\ 1 P �° N I 1 30 /� GO to I " N I I I 24 East o x 150.00 I S o 9t S I �(°\ I R L4 V) % " I� Ln 14 --r--! =�,�a- 30 of---------� 929.8 93o.1 150-00 929.2 ( -0 I TOP OF FOUNDATION = 9 30.5 _ ii �� 1 GARAGE FLOOR = 930.1 �+ BASEMENT FLOOR = 92'1.3 Benchmark SEWER SERVICE ELEV. =920.3N'/922.0St lz�) T.A14. @ Alw. corof PROPOSED ELEVATIONS : Q L. 3, B. 2 : 929.96 EXISTING ELEVATIONS DRAINAGE DIRECTIONS DENOTES LOT CORNERS 0 DENOTES OFFSET STAKE: o ti CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I hereby certify that on 5 / ! /87 I surveyed the property described above and that the above plot is a correct representation of sold survey. Jeffrey V/1-intl4ren, License No. 14376 4vr - >s���:rM-<±"!'SSP+t`!-eJ.!t?�s`•;:�xra.'..Mrf�+2P?�c��?'- -�..'l f�i�J�i`"io y�j:•d.y��•r C V. N�' z Hedlund Engineering Services 9201EactBloomingtonFreeway Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Land Surveyors Civil Engineers Land Planners Phone: 888-0289 SA(,riC#01'OS eertiliXte a� BOOK _ PAGE A JOB NO. 87R-264 SURVEY FOR: B.H. Grace Corp. DESCRIBED AS: PARCEL A: That part of Lot 5, Block 1, RAHN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of,, said Lot 5 distant 50.00 feet west of the northeast corner thereof, to a point on the south line of said Lot 5 distant 50.00 feet west of the southeast corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. PARCEL B: That part of Lot 5, Block 1, RAHN RIDGE, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said Lot 5 distant 50.00 feet west of the northeast corner thereof, to a point on the south line of said Lot 5 distant 50.00 feet west of the southeast corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. TOP OF FOUNDATION = 933.4 GARAGE FLOOR = 933. o93p S 934 4'.957- BASEMENT FLOOR = 930.2 /OO -OD 0_ SEWER SERVICE ELEV. = 922.0 E/927.7 W 50.00 _ _50_00 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS : EXISTING ELEVATIONS — DRAINAGE DIRECTIONS --� DENOTES LOT CORNERS 0 / DENOTES OFFSET STAKE: ID �O 932.7_, 34 �O 34 p, PYOPO SCO N Proposed a, Nouse N io Ci ^' /%use N 4l - m �� I /7.67 8 L6 27.67 l 1 I GAR. w U � N GAR. 2 ?2.33 1 C � J 27.6 Zo•33 t'1 �3Z�a� _ ~ -9` 32_7> 931 1— — — — 931.5 �J 93/.z 50.00, 50.00 930.6 /DO.OU 930.9 ERS T 9.30•3 -- o� 930.6 930.5 M P/N OPK OP/ VE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I hereby certify that on 51 1 /87 I surveyed the property described above and that the above plat is a correct representation of sold survey. JefXe Lindgren, License No. 14376 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 WAIVER OF PLAT/CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION E. Waiver of Plat for Zachman Brothers for Twin Home Lot Splits on Lots 10 and 11, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th Addition on Cinnamon Ridge near Metcalf Drive --An application was received by the City of Eagan for a waiver of plat requesting the division of two (2) duplex lots located on Lots 10 and 11, Block 1, Cinnamon 6th Addition by Zachman Brothers Construction. For additional information on this item"ref e to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat as submitted by Zachman Brothers Construction for Lots 10 and 11, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th Addition. 147 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: ZACHMAN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: LOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK 1, CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (DUPLEX) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 7, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 29, 1987 REPORTED BY: KENNETH ROBERTS, PLANNING INTERN APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a waiver of plat requesting the division of two duplex lots located on Lots 10 and 11, Block 1, Cinnamon Ridge 6th Addition. PLANNER COMMENTS: Lot 10, Block 1, is located along Cinnamon Ridge Trail and abuts duplex lots on two sides and Metcalf Drive along the rear. Sufficient utilities exist to meet the needs of the subsequent individual lots. Lot 11, Block 1, is on the corner of Cinnamon Ridge Trail and Metcalf Drive and abuts Lot 10 on its northeast side. Sufficient utilities exist to meet the needs of the subsequent individual lots. If these waivers of plat are approved, all other applicable City ordinances shall apply. 4 • 5a :_ `'.N �'74.rZ"9�: K�._•ttY. t.'rd: :� ':N,i;Y�.�, -.:;: s�i::t::s:st�k'.a'�S�.w€Sites_a..�.<^:sk•�3..3.%A�e�+.'=w`�I .y 5 Hedlund Engineering Services 9201 East Bloomington Freeway Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Land Surveyors Civil Engineers Land Planners Phone: 888-0289 A "' SA (ATC#0 r-irg eertilkjIte JAIF BOOK -LO -7— PAGE 3 JOB NO. 86-545 SURVEY FOR: Zachman Brothers Const. Co. DESCRIBED AS: PARCEL A: That part of Lot 10, Block 1, CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying northeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 10 distant 33.33 feet northeast of the most southerly corner thereof, to a point on the northwesterly line of said Lot 10 distant 36.68 feet northeast of the most westerly corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. PARCEL B: That part of Lot 10, Block 1, CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying southwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 10 distant 33.33 feet northeast of the most southerly corner thereof, to a point on the northwesterly line of said Lot 10 distant 36.68 feet northeast of the most westerly corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION Of BUILDING I hereby certify that on _61161$% I made a survey of the location of the building on the property described hereon and that the location of said building is correctly showe hereon. Sef r D. indgren,1`�o. 14376 TOP OF FOUNDATION = 920.5 GARAGE FLOOR =920.1 BASEMENT FLOOR = 911.3 q0� SEWER SERVICE ELEV. = NIA PROPOSED ELEVATIONS O *<`, EXISTING ELEVATIONS DRAINAGE DIRECTIONS :�- 0 DENOTES LOT CORNERS : O DENOTES OFFSET STAKE:O ,e ft CO. F ebb 0 6foef� 3a1Q �o N l Lai ' is ti do-'. ~ r— O f' p o .o o N C -Piz. oL r4 0 R p, dg.9 R � N CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY CSN I hereby certify that on 1Z /'19 /ee I surveyed the property described above and that the above plot is a correct representation of sold survey. Jebfre��C?. LINIdpren, Llcen3e"No.14376 Hedlund Engineering Services 9201 East Bloomington Freeway Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Land Surveyors Civil Engineers Land Planners Phone: 888-0289 Arnewl"llfs eertiftate BOOK /07 PAGE 3 JOB NO. 86--546 SURVEY FOR: Zachman Brothers Const. Co. DESCRIBED AS: PARCEL A: That part of Lot 11, Block 1, CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying northeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 11 distant 34.77 feet southwest of the most easterly corner thereof, to a point on the northwesterly line of said Lot 11 distant 38.11 feet southwest of the most northerly corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. PARCEL B: That part of Lot 11, Block 1, CINNAMON RIDGE 6TH ADDITION, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying southwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot 11 distant 34.77 feet southwest of the most easterly corner thereof, to a point on the northwesterly line of said Lot 11 distant. 38.11 feet southwest of the most northerly corner thereof, and reserving easements of record. CLNTI►ICATN Of LOCATION Of BUILDING I hereby certify that on 6//6/87 I made a survey of the location of the building on the property described hereon and that the location of said building is correctly shown hereon. Ja r Lindgren, . 14':76 14 a4' 0 S5A0� q / CERTIFICATE OF SURVE\ I hereby certify that on .5 /?o/ �I surveyed the property described above and that the above plot is a correct representation of said survey. 1 ��• �� �� Jeffrey D.�' Indaren. License No. 14376 \ N Ne u ei o TOP OF FOUNDATION = 9(9-Z GARAGE FLOOR =918.8 BASEMENT FLOOR =914-i SEWER SERVICE ELEV. = NIA PROPOSED ELEVATIONS : O EXISTING ELEVATIONS : DRAINAGE DIRECTIONS —r— DENOTES LOT CORNERS 0 DENOTES OFFSET STARE: o Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 SIGN PERMITZFEDERAL LAND COMPANY F. Sign Permit/Federal Land Company for Three (3) Signs in the Town Centre Addition --Federal Land Company is requesting consideration by the City to locate sign monuments at strategic locations in the Town Centre and Eagan Heights Planned Development. Also Midwest AutoMalls, Inc., has requested a ground sign for the Super America station to be located in the Eagan AutoMal 1 located at 1399 Town Centre Drive. The request is different from the agreement that was executed between Federal Land Company and the City of Eagan for the pylon sign locations, thus requiring a review and action by the City Council. Refer to a memo prepared by the City Planner with the appropriate attachments found on pages /Y -Z- through /y3 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the sign location requests as presented by Federal Land Company and Midwest AutoMall and to make the appropriate modifications to the pylon sign agreement between Federal Land Company and the City of Eagan. /l! MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE DATE: JUNE 30, 1987 SUBJECT: TOWN CENTRE SIGNAGE TO BE 1987 CITY COUNCIL MEETING (TOWN CENTRE 70 AND EAGAN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) CONSIDERED AT THE JULY 7, HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK Federal Land Company, developers of Town Centre 70 and Eagan Heights Commercial Park planned development, have submitted a request to the Planning Department for sign monuments to be placed at strategic locations in the Town Centre and Eagan Heights planned development areas. In addition, Midwest Auto Malls, Inc. has requested a ground sign for the Super America station to be located in the Eagan auto mall located at 1399 Town Centre Drive. The Planning Department felt it would be appropriate for the City Council to consider these two items, given the sensitive nature of signage in the Town Centre 70 and Eagan Heights planned development areas and the existance of a pylon sign agreement between the City of Eagan and Federal Land Company. Federal Land Company has requested the placement of four sign monuments to be placed in the Town Centre 70 and Eagan Heights planned development areas. The sign monument locations are at the intersections of Town Centre and Duckwood Drive, Duckwood Drive and Denmark Avenue, Yankee Doodle Road and Denmark Avenue, and Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue. Please refer to the enclosed exhibit for precise sign location. The proposed sign monuments are technically not considered pylons and would not specifically require City Council consideration. Given the fact, however, that some of the sign monuments are located in areas designated for pylon signs per the pylon sign agreement, it was felt that the City Council may wish to review the proposed plans. Please refer to the enclosed exhibit illustrating pylon sign locations per the pylon sign agreement. In conjunction with Federal Land Company's sign monument request, Midwest Auto Malls, Inc. is requesting a ground sign for the Super America station located at the intersection of Town Centre and Duckwood Drive. This proposed sign is not to exceed 7' in height, with the sign area not to exceed 4' in height, and will not be supplemented by any type of indirect lighting. The applicant argues that the sign installation is needed for thr.ee reasons: 1) it is felt that a hardship exists for vehichles traveling on Duckwood Drive and Pilot Knob Road with occupants having a limited view of the store frontage and display of gas prices; 2) signage is needed to display gas prices; and 3) ground signage will be used to promote tennant identification. MEMO/TOWN CENTRE SIGNAGE REQUEST JUNE 29, 1987 PAGE TWO Midwest Auto Malls, Inc. is also requesting the placement of signage for Firestone on the marquee of the south side of the Eagan Auto Mall as it faces the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Duckwood Drive. The word "Firestone," is to be illustrated with red illuminated letters with the total space not to exceed 24 feet. The applicant argues that this is needed to attract vehicles as Knob Road and feel that greater is appropriate given the need into the Auto Mall. Please illustrating the specific design additional signage for Firestone they proceed northbound on Pilot visibility for the anchor tennant to attract greater traffic flow refer to the enclosed exhibit of the Firestone signage. City Council needs to make the specific determination as to the appropriateness of the Federal Land and Midwest Auto Mall sign request in relationship to the pylon sign agreement between Federal Land Company and the City of Eagan. More specifically, determination needs to be made as to the need and asthetic appeal of the Midwest Auto Mall sign request for the Super America station. I trust the enclosed information and exhibit is sufficient for the City Council to make this determination and of course I will be on hand to assist in the discussion. &Ac-" City Planner _ Enclosure DR/SS/af 113 (f) z 0 0 z LLI z O5 z 0 C/) 0 Lu' Cf) 0 a- 0 cc CL got z 3: 0 z 3 0 6: m -jLo II C33 4.1 , is t-VN-fTV'9'0)'1�3NVOH 9ONN10 N Z O of 0 t - Z w z 0 p z 0 0 1- u 0 �s z �u NSC � � O I i ' ru o.� Qy A� 2s wa Qw T'k --1. ---- wi {pN Ck o Z' I . 7 O I i- '. w N Z O of 0 t - Z w z 0 E .� r'�'� TY p ► r a 71op 00 5 roN� 47-4 r =H EL. IN i ASO ,�S ft�Q'C7• �d�,1 1t�13WnNOW� N�d'1d Hij1e=; '1 �MOd - H►�15 15Nol,� ,AGIM .. ` '14,) Looe ►'n�ls70 \\ --------------- A � J�nnrr r N011�� 5 N �. � � f•J 1��1 of � � 8 P, vw..�r..:...• �-_.a.....•.ufau'rr.•.. •...-.. vah�lY[c:t✓l.. e.'..a ..ry ...a...��..M.•x�Jl•MR VM�V¢--atw.erfl- ..........�...-.....— TOP or- wt�q T -- "g WIDE 5L ma vlfilN EoH- ,N4CdNG• bLh• _AS O'r M160 O, I 4'aivII sro-,e c.^10•ArwrbR %f AS WEa v. TO PIC. 16 t16 •Arb II / (y HL. gtJ�.b+6a �I �oF tf PrfYGr+O II �•` EL. �o; o AITI $ %TAiM'-M%S ST-. Z �. LOGkWEWY b N. pl - is-- •S6A-A`4T 9A, 4io6 c I --• Tbi. of c"Is _ �I E�. sol �.-8- d To to OF4hLOG -_ ' Ek loLOP.. 4' � SII _ . vEco�ATlv6 PaoK AG& CDNG. k LOGIK TO G. pieLoW GFAr�� r aFQILIA 0E ... —_7 - /( LG,IoLVCK FoJND. i a v O 4 O o� T ° '° tP• 1 ' l- d a - �.F !S Z W V w Q T d .. u� v� ��+► N < u o O NO Uu_ N i i l -d N• u• � a T. �� � _ - y �r Y � u • 0 % o tl� V oSU t Q.J � pp 4J Zjea F all K s 1 7 Q. Ul t a. A ►-Z I ul r, O Za Zl - uUl R <ie °1 d �W m > 9 tV JJ o i►ZZA m< r.,,>N ,ri_tw Y Z�U• N -L .1i oLW o�I . <,L<� r- anD v I; o 43 � I L .. J T_ Z OQk I- Q d W w z_ • U� ILI N tL1 I • 2.T 11116 �u 4 Ir tp le 's R to }I ul oM,k W 2 +t p lu n� ZZ o o �� o•u IL �� �J wiz � A -4I- a� w �� v'4 a� Iq rt �t�,�• �T oW 1' ► li Sl.� n 1 N1p L .. J T_ Z OQk I- Q d W w z_ • U� ILI N tL1 I • 2.T 11116 �u 4 m cr W CL D JO JO �a. cr W CL D k 1��t�ifi L Arn..S 1 FIRESTONE LETTER ILLUMINATION . i REb 1LLONINATED ire ' 114 .�_rn r, s. it' t it app kow0ppb,jCPO VA Y r:�•J1� LLI. �.'''Vt� Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 BUILDING PERMIT/FEDERAL LAND COMPANY G. Building Permit to Construct a Fence Between Amoco Car Care Center and Tom Thumb Market --The Federal Land Company is proposing to construct a fence between the Amoco Car Care Center and Yankee Square Shopping Center to control parking for the center and Amoco Car Care. There were no cross easements approved at the time the Yankee Square Shopping Center was platted or at the time the Amoco Car Care Center was approved by the City. For additional information and a sketch drawing regarding the building permit request, refer to pages ZZ�5 through /Z ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or permit to allow the construction of a fence between Care Center and Tom Thumb Market located in the Shopping Center. deny a building the Amoco Car Yankee Square MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JULY 1, 1987 SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT FOR FEDERAL LAND COMPANY The City has been contacted by Federal Land Company to construct a fence on the property line between the Yankee Square Shopping Center and the Amoco Car Care facility located on the west side of Washington Drive. There has been concern expressed regarding the number of cars being parked in this general area and that service vehicles and parking are in conflict with the overall circulation. The Federal Land Company has requested a building permit to construct a fence on the property line to eliminate some of the parking and circulation issues. As a result of the review, City staff has suggested that in order to separate drive and parking facilities, it could be done by constructing the five foot setback criteria which would require concrete curbing and landscaping in this five foot setback area. The applicants now have submitted plans showing this curbing and would meet the criteria for the five foot setback from a parking lot area. In review of the request, it does meet the ordinance requirements for setback criteria; however, the circulation may be a problem in putting up the barriers separating the drive and parking areas. City Planner DCR/mc /z-5' Federal Lang Company Ybnkee Square Office II • 3470 Washington Drive • Suite 102 i Eagan, Minnesota 55122 • Tel. 612-452-3303 June 23, 1987 Mr. Dale Runkle Eagan City Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21-199 Eagan, Mn. 55121 Dear Mr. Runkle, Enclosed is a copy of the "Island Plan" for Yankee Square Shopping Center. I have been telling you of the complaints of my tenants as to: 1. Employee parking; 2. Trucks blocking drive-thru loading and unloading food stuffs at Tom Thumb, liquor at Kenney's Liquor Store, supplies at Pizza Restaurant, etc.; 3. Rubbish removal problems; 4. Drive-thru blocked at times not allowing for emergency vehicles to move swiftly through, and; 5. Aesthetically depressing. I must respond to my Tenants and have been trying to do so since August of '86 with a workable solution as to the above problems. The plan is self explanatory and has been reviewed by an architect and a traffic engineer and both agree as to this plan resolving the problems mentioned above to a great _degree. Considering this plan meets all city ordinances, codes andkno variances are needed, it would seem to me that the planning department could handle this matter and issue a permit, but if you say no, then I hope this matter can come before the July 7th Council Meeting so as to resolve this matter. I will be in attendance at the July 7th meeting should any questions need to be answered concerning the above. cerely, Vernon R. Colon, Partner Federal Land Company VRC/ap Encl: V) 7a --i m m WASHINGTON. DRIVE 20' z n> > 200 m to i m n 0 w Ob Yt z r) ox 0 <0 z n rn m C: LO =MK" mhlwllm�l Y Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION H. Rezoning for Eagan Royale Addition Revised of Approximately 46.848 Acres from A to R-1 and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 72 Lots --A public hearing was first considered by the Advisory Planning Commission at their April 30 meeting, to consider the rezoning and preliminary plat for Eagan Royale Addition located on 47 acres abutting Safari Pass on the east, Highway 35E on the west and Apple Valley on the south. The Advisory Planning Commission did give approval to the Eagan Royale Addition, however, at the request of the developer, a continuance for City Council review was granted pending a merger by Developers Construction with Meritor Development Corporation. Once the Meritor Development Corporation became involved in the project there were some changes suggested and therefore the rezoning and preliminary plat was sent back to the Advisory Planning Commission for their review and consideration. At the June 23, 1987 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, action was taken to recommend approval of the rezoning from agricultural to R-1 and a preliminary plat consisting of 72 lots on a 1.1 acre outlot. This plat is consistent with the January, 1987 Land Use Plan designating this area D -I. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department reports, copies are enclosed on pages through l/3j . The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission met on Thursday, July 2, 1987, and is recommending a cash donation in lieu of a land dedication for the Eagan Royale Addition. For a copy of the dvisory Planning Commission minutes on this item, refer to page (s)` ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R-1 and a preliminary plat entitled Eagan Royale Addition Revised. 1z$ Ll CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT (EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION) APPLICANT: MERITOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 31 EXISTING ZONING: A(AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 23, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 10, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: At the April 30 Advisory Planning Commission meeting the Eagan Royale Addition was approved for 73 single family lots on 47 acres abutting Safari Pass on the east, Highway 35E on the west and Apple Valley on the south. The applicants asked to be continued prior to the City Council so utility design could be studied to a greater degree. Since then Meritor Corporation has taken over the project and revised the original plan. New applications have been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 47 acres to R-1 and a Preliminary Plat consisting of 72 lots and a 1.1 acre outlot. This plat is consistant with the January 1987 Land Use Plan designating this area D -I (0-3 Units/acre). SITE PLAN/CODE CONFORMANCE: This site is heavily wooded, full of hills and water holding depressions suited extremely well for upper bracket housing. The 72 lots give this plat a gross density of 1.5 units/acre. The lots vary in size from 15,000 S.F. to 69,900 S.F. along 35E. The cul de sac serving those lots is within the Code 500' length requirement. No individual lot variances are requested. All lots are at least 85' wide at the setback line - most are at least 95' and should be able to accommodate 3 car garage homes comfortably. This plat reduces the loss of trees on the site significantly. Approximately 60% of the lots will not have any grading beyond the 30' setback line. This will allow individual lot grading for these custom built homes. Five home builders have been selected for this project and Meritor will retain architectural control. No Association is proposed. Meritor has been in contact with the owner of the property to the north in an effort to create two cohesive developments. They also are the developer of the Briar Oaks subdivision or the south in Apple Valley. EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The grading proposed by the development is basically limited to the roadway construction. Lot grading for house pads is proposed on approximately 30% of the lots. The grading proposed is sensitive to the numerous amenities which exist on this site. Proposed street grades range from a minimum of 0.5% to a maximum of 8.0%. These street grades fall within the acceptable ranges for streets. The development proposes to utilize the existing low area amenities for collection of storm water runoff. The development fails to provide outlets for the ponds used as a collection basin. Additional storm sewer is required in the southwesterly portion of the site to prevent runoff from draining into Apple Valley. There are also two low areas in the southerly portion of the site, easterly of the Safari Reservoir which become land locked. These low areas should also have outlets provided. The development fails to accommodate the runoff generated by the Safari Reservoir site. A final erosion control plan is subject to review and acceptance by staff. UTILITIES: Water main of sufficient size presently exists along Safari Pass & inthe entrance to the water reservoir site. The development proposes to tie into the existing 24" water main in Safari Pass, loop westerly, northerly and easterly throughout the site and tie back into the existing Safari Pass water main. Water main laterals to provide service to the cul-de-sac streets is then tapped into this loop system. The development is providing the required water main stub to the adjacent northerly property. The water main stub to the property southerly of this development is not required. Trunk sanitary sewer installation is required prior to construction of the necessary lateral sanitary sewer to serve the<„ proposed development. The proposed sanitary sewer along the common lot lines in Block 3 of the proposed development can be avoided. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed site is provided by Safari Pass on the east and through Briar Oaks of Apple Valley 2nd Addition on the south. The development is in compliance with the City policy on maintaining interconnection of roadways between neighboring communities. The proposed loop roadway throughout the site will be required to be a minimum of a 60' right-of-way. The proposed 50' right-of-way cul-de-sac streets are acceptable. A 60' minimum radius is required on all cul-de-sacs. The minimum roadway width on the proposed cul-de-sac street shall be 28' and the minimum roadway width on the loop street shall be 32'. The development is proposing to eliminate the existing gravel road access to the water reservoir site. The development will be responsible for then providing a new access road off of the loop street through the development acceptable to the City. /'�0 EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OP-WAYS/PERMITS: This development will be responsible for dedicating the appropriate ponding and utility easements on the final plat. The ponding easements for this development shall be dedicated to incorporate the maximum storage volume capacities necessary to handle the runoff generated by the development. The 50' half right-of-way that presently exists for Safari Pass exceeds the minimum 30' half right-of-way required by the City for a residential street. The City will vacate the westerly 20' of the existing 50' half right-of-way adjacent to the proposed development upon submission of the appropriate petition by the developer. The development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary regulatory permits in the time frame conducive to'development. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed site has been assessed for sanitary sewer trunk and water area under Project 254 at the single family rate. The development will be responsible for the following additional assessments as a condition of final plat approval. Project No. Description Rate Quantity Amount 316 Trunk Storm Sewer $.053/SF 2,025,540 SF $107,350 366 Lateral Benefit Water Main(B) 12.47/FF 609.29 FF 7,598 254 Lateral Benefit Water Main(A) 12.47/FF 1,116.66 FF 13,925 254 Street/Safari Pass 35.44/FF 1,011 FF 35,830 TOTAL $164,703 (A) Safari Pass (B) Safari Reservoir site access road All final assessment obligations will be calculated based on the final quantities contained in the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 4. 131 CONDITIONS: (EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION) 1) All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2) No driveway access shall be allowed onto Safari Pass. 3) This plat shall be subject to the recommendations of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. 4) Downstream storm sewer facilities shall be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. 5) The appropriate ponding area easements shall be dedicated on the final plat. 6) The development shall submit an erosion/sediment control plan acceptable to staff. 7) The development shall be responsible for providing storm sewer for the existing drain at the Safari Reservoir site. 8) Trunk sanitary sewer installation shall be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. 9) The proposed sanitary sewer along the common lot lines in the easterly portion of the proposed development shall not be allowed. 10) The proposed entrance/loop roadway into this site shall be dedicated with a 60' right-of-way. The street width within the 60' right-of-way shall be a minimum of 32' face of curb to face of curb. 11 ) The proposed cul-de-sac street shall be dedicated with a 50' wide right-of-way. A minimum 60' radius on the bubble of the cul-de-sac and a minimum street width of 28' face of curb to face of curb. 12) In addition to common lot line drainage and utility easements, the development shall be responsible for any adiitional easements required for final approval of plans and specifications. ` 13) It shall be the responsibility of this development to provide utility service to each individual lot in the proposed development. 14) The development shall be responsible for providing an acceptable access road to the Safari Reservoir site. 15) The development shall be responsible for submitting storm sewer calculations which justify and support the fact that there are no outlets provided for the areas designated as ponding areas. /3L r�11Tl ... x=81 A�Jff :01 1 R B co ik' R-2 TEST 1! R B Cf!.Tf;? 0 CLIA 2-7 7 A R 23 W /3-3 D-11 csc p D-11 DI LB (D-111 PFI RB zE LB L CPD p D - - U-1 /3-3 I I 1 1cr1 iiE(���E ,,III �i(1 • s Il�g� ii e11llti�•t 4 'PRELIMINARY PLAT tta:�®�i X71 �3.r • Merltor Development Corp. 3500 WEST 80th 9T. SUITE 1700 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55431 6. jjR GRADING PLM EaganU&0 ie Meritor Development Corp 3600 WEST 501h ST. SUITE It MINNEAPOLIS MN .5411 go 1111111 ammulloo I m M m z GRADING PLM EaganU&0 ie Meritor Development Corp 3600 WEST 501h ST. SUITE It MINNEAPOLIS MN .5411 go 1111111 ammulloo I SCHOOLIT -'46.�/74.0 146, cn J a 0, N T F J, C (g)46.0/72.0 145 46.3/7! r a MARI 16" ami mom m 1,6, 10: 'HN RA 39.0/65.0 PP RK A 7. LL 230 37.7/63.0' ib, -: iflDRIVER E 16" �JCT : T E'NST-ERi 112.5/56 22 a7 /970 F --, .0 227 C2;1) 30.8/55.]a] w 1000 Ispp J �k U119? 6 23 loon 8 (233:58: 1; 7,6 L SL' o.;5 'D 1 11 IE R 23 W city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME 5.8 94 86.0/ 95.0IP �r 81.1. 8.1 'OWER 72:9`1:82.0 — 0 -(L2 1) J - FI 45 9.0 (,.7 R ECLIF lb6 219, ADDITION ro 225 DAKOTA 1 COUNTY PARK .... SAH SfA 25.8�/33.0-­--' APPLE, VA LL E Y ii CNN SU.BJECT PARCEL EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION WATER MASTER P L-A N 10 FIG. �3 approved: standard I plate #: + SCHOOL',r J g���^0. L I F Fir i : r: C`\j:• �, A -z. = �,. ..___ u 191 t-.3:. �'r r�::# zl� '%✓ ti; \:f<<1�._ - ��.r:.�2nd i� ,P=-12 /�ti :. .'� TN .I" � 1: 893:3/ e.W 9 � ,w� t r ---r L,. a_ Pte•-r''-�' -tl C o;� (. t `-I? - !,117`p 4�'�904.0 L AP 24 AP 22 �• �ri' �Gc d��'�AR:.;vFO+it'.... [�� +�'�T':v :872:0, 873.6 896.0/BP--1o" T^.Yi 21i ��?i II: r 882.0 r;9 6 p _ \y 9 _ � BLg.��l , 15 12• 18•. G%)� % QQ � - _ 1 84321 MARI N 8866 12 ' ` v`, 1 / rt}? 6P=20 T" 892.3 ��� ' AP -23 ulT j:920.O:ia R.AHN ! - 889.3 / M,, _ - 9,00.0 0. (" I 881.7ti c i A'P-40 1 t P rr • • 889.0 �� t2. '�� AP_ I I / -912.'1 I = ` ,ti 889.2/ wv I ; 89.4.a P-25 LE R4 n ;LLLO1F� S 880.5 AP -50 BB.S 2 ��� ;� / 1•i �� ''...: �1 �: W col. ml5f?CIA 886.0 8950 926 1 !_afI 4 154 'R K 894_.0 / ��5 /' 1- � A.- _�1 .12-.21' -A- (i (N SBP -317 - AP -10 �`� z ]UfJL C , AP -13 ! r 935.0 C _.925.61 Y `:906.2 m �� �AP- 14 I I F �t_ 937.6 �� '�ar'1'9/4.0 �j 912.1 =8PF32,_ '1• -_ i�l, '93-3.9- 'LAT 33.9; Z ) ��\\� v Rit:ERf 1 AP -44 ' 9/9.3 9376- i1�F` N ( RT_ST I 915.9 A f / D ^� LS.- I� t Efi�TE _ 9/8.0 cc /_ AP -19 1 P,- 930.6 �? 0 /920.6 . � P rr-r.•�� 2 � AP=16• a -r1o� A P = 4 5' X38.8', �, _ , � /, r , CAI CLIXr - tE-4?4 i i .H•920.0i I ..:C' r 920.6r i' - 946.0y << � ��7��,923:5� �" ^�P4� 946.9, I., •- , _.. N� Ct��Z.: "���26.Q� L.., L�• ��`��P9 3 4.0 I _ � AP -15- `! • 1 2 4'III 1 '� 08: 8'iLi � , •9 AP -3.0' �� MI5 -0 _ .. h_, ; l 4 922:0 -L �1� �[r.(-, rF PAI -AP-46 •_ r v `945.0:L � rV 924: f 948.5 P-18 /� ISAFaR 1 1' 1� 925.5 1 111 r� 9.3/.3h' �{ - %4`==�- 1 I Nor�'y,;. .0.� AP -171 r;> LP -59 I L aLis : i 9 5 �^ � ��%, , DAKOTA COUNTY PARK 893.3 ""-(A-.4g•; 'T:::•:: 1 : , 15 A-yy 900.0 ES A :. LP 1 � 1 .• s APPLE ` VALLEY -'-'� 1; v SUBJECT PARCEL ................ . E•AGAN ROYALE ADDITION - FIG. 5P 1 City of eagan approved: a standard PUBLIC STORM SEWER plate #: WORKS DEPARTMENT1 MASTER LAN N ti ............. ............. STORM SEWER TRUNK 4 6.5 Ac. ............. *-o's'�►' STREET/STORM SEWER LATERAL 1,011 - WATER LATERAL BENEFIT 1,116.66' 2 "- D w moi; m � En N t r V c s Oq -Q .q L�2GZO F i s , _ •:cr.--:c---_ � _ dei APC Minutes June 23, 1987 Harrison moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family). All voted yes. Harrison moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions. shall be adhered .to. 2. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission shall review this plat for the land dedication requirements. 3. The Council shall authorize the installation of the trunk sanitary sewer, trunk water main, and trunk storm sewer facilities through this development prior to final plat approval. This development shall be required to dedicate the required drainage and ponding easements for Pond LP -28 to incorporate the 916.0 elevation. .4. The development shall dedicate the additional drainage and utility easements as required by the alignment and depth of any public utility located outside of public right-of-way. 5. This development shall be responsible for all pending and future assessments associated with the development of this subdivision relating to trunk area water, trunk area storm sewer, and future Cliff Road Street and trail improvements. 6. The proposed Lot 17, Block 5, and the two lots in the most southwesterly portion shall remain as Outlots. 7. The developer shall save as many trees as possible. All voted aye. EAGAN ROYALE ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing called by Chairman Hall was in regard to the application of Meritor Development Corporation for rezoning of 47 acres to R-1 and a preliminary plat consisting of 72 lots and a 1.1 acre Outlot. City Planner Dale Runkle advised that the plat was consistent with the Eagan Land Use Plan and that on April 30, 1987, the Advisory Planning Commission had approved a preliminary plat previously proposed by Developers Construction. Mr. Larry Frank, on behalf of Meritor Development Corporation, advised that the revised plat greatly reduced the. amount of damage to vegetation and natural topography. He also advised that the plat was being developed in conjunction with the Briar Oaks plat directly south in Apple Valley. He advised that the minimum value of homes in the area were anticipated to be $200,000.00. The proposed outlot would be for the future development of two lots along the cul-de-sac in conjunction with the neighboring landowner to the north. 0 APC Minutes June 23, 1987 Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning to R-1 (Single Family). All voted yea. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. No driveway access shall be allowed onto Safari Pass. 3. This plat shall be subject to the recommendations of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. 4. Downstream storm sewer facilities shall be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. 5. The appropriate ponding area easements shall be dedicated on the final plat. 6. The development shall submit an erosion/sediment control plan acceptable to staff. 7. The development shall be responsible for providing storm sewer for the existing drain at the Safari Reservoir site. 8. Trunk sanitary sewer installation shall be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. 9. All plans and specifications shall be subject to approval by the City staff. 10. The proposed entrance/loop roadway into this site shall be dedicated with a 60 foot .right-of-way. The street width within the 60 foot right-of-way shall be a minimum of 32 feet face of curb to face of curb. `• 11. The proposed cul-de-sac street shall be dedicated with a 50 foot wide right-of-way. A minimum 60 foot radius on the bubble of the cul-de-sac and a minimum street width of 28 feet face of curb to face of curb. 12. In -addition to common lot line drainage and utility easements, the development shall be responsible for any additional easements required for final approval of plans and specifications. 13. It shall be the responsibility of this development to provide utility service to each individual lot in the proposed development. 14. The development shall be responsible for providing an acceptable access road to the Safari Reservoir site. 6 APC Minutes June 23, 1987 15. The development shall be responsible for submitting storm sewer calculations which justify and support the fact that there are no outlets provided for the areas designated as ponding areas. All voted in favor. HOLIDAY STATION STORES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SIGN The next public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairman Hall upon the application of Holiday Station Stores, Inc. for a conditional use permit for a pylon sign with a variance for the proposed facility at the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Nicols Road with total signage area of 134 square feet to provide a sign for both Holiday and Precision Tune. The Commission was advised that a sign of 125 square feet had been previously approved. Now the applicant was back for a revised sign to facilitate its additional tenants. Gustafson moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and variance for a 134 square foot pylon sign. All voted in favor. BUILDING BLOCK ADDITION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of William Dunkley for a conditional use permit to allow a day care facility in a Planned Development Limited Business District and a preliminary plat for the Building Block Addition, located along the west side of Scott Trail and immediately south of the existing duplexes. Mr. Dale Runkle advised that the original Planned Development Agreement would have to be amended, as it originally provided only for office buildings. On behalf of the applicant were Mr. Brian Carrey, Sue Dunkley and architect Nick Rio who described the proposal. which had a residential style with brick lower and lapped wood upper walls with a pitched roof. He indicated the children's play areas and rooms and the landscaping to be located around the development. He also advised that 20 parking spaces would be adequate for the staff and traffic from parents and children. Mr. Joseph Russell, 1105 Duckwood Trail, questioned the traffic impact. Questions were raised about a proposed car care center immediately south. The representatives of the car care center were present, although no applications have been submitted. McCrea moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the amendment to the planned development, conditional use permit and preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 7 4' -<4._-- Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 PRELIMINARY PLATIREZONING FOR DALLAS DEVELOPMENT 2ND ADDITION I. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and a Rezoning of Approximately 25.35 Acres Including the Existing 8.3 Acre Silver Bell lst Addition from LI (Light Industrial) to Commercial Planned Development and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 3 Lots on 17.05 Acres and a Conditional Use Permit for Motor Fuel Sales --A public hearing was held at the June 23, 1987, Advisory Planning Commission meeting to consider applications submitted by Dallas Development requesting 1) a rezoning of 25.35 LI Acres to a Mixed Use Planned Development District that includes the existing 8.3 acre 103,000 square foot Silver Bell Plaza, 2) a preliminary plat consisting of three lots on 17.05 acres and 3) a conditional use permit for motor fuel sales. Also required is a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment from industrial to CPD as a result of the rezoning. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the rezoning, preliminary plat, conditional use permit and Comprehensive Guide Plan amendments as presented. Dallas Development Company is also requesting a special use for a temporary school to be located in the existing Silver Bell facility. The school is a private K through 6 elementary school which is more accurately described in the aforementioned Planning/Engineering report. For additional information on this item, refer to a report prepare by the Planning and Engineering Departments found on pages/;f' through �. For a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission action, refer to page(s) 16 — ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment for Dallas Development, 2) rezoning from LI to Commercial Planned Development, 3) preliminary plat for Dallas Development 2nd Addition and a conditional use permit for motor fuel sales. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING PRELIMINARY PLAT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (DALLAS DEVELOPMENT 2ND ADDITION) SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: DALLAS DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: SW 1/4 SECTIION 17, SE 1/4 SECTION 18 EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 23, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 15, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted by Dallas Development requesting a Rezoning of 25.35 Li (Light Industrial) acres to a mixed use Planned Development district that includes the existing 8.3 -acre, 103,000 SF Silver Bell Plaza office/showroom, a Preliminary Plat consisting of three lots on 17.05 acres, and a Conditional Use Permit for motor fuel sales. This site is located along the west side of Highway 13 and is bisected by Silver Bell Road. The January 1987 Land Use Plan designates this area Industrial; therefore an Amendment will be necessary. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Currently the site is vacant, open grassland and is dominated by a major freeway billboard that will be removed with this proposal. The area to the northeast is developed Li business and the area to the west is approximately 38 R-4 zoned acres. Kennebec Drive will be extended to the northeast with this plan, creating a loop to Highway 13 through Seneca Road. The Dallas Development 2nd Addition received final plat approval on April 2, 1986. That building was restricted to a 50/50 office/warehouse use with no other uses approved other than those in Li districts. PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: The existing building will not :change its approved use. It was included in the Planned Development so that architectural/site uniformity as well as the proposed uses in each building can be monitored by the City. I The 17 -acre, new construction area has three major uses. All Code setbacks have been maintained and 9' -wide parking stalls are shown throughout the site. The following is a breakdown of each lot. Lot 1 Private School This building was designed to office building standards in the event that the use would ever change from a private school. Twenty-eight parking stalls are desired; Code requires 106 for offices this size. Proof of parking accommodates this requirement. The applicant hopes to open the school to students in September, 1987. Since this building cannot be completed in time, the owners will also request a Special Permit to allow this use in the existing office/warehouse. The permanent building would be ready for occupancy in early 1988 if the construction process proceeds as planned. This facility is designed to accommodate three hundred children at capacity. However, the intent is not to overcrowd, with a maximum of twenty-two per class. The first year will limit enrollment to one hundred fifty students (seventy 3 and 4-year-o.lds and eighty K - 3rd grade). The second year will expand to K -6th grade. The school will be fully regulated by State educational agencies. The staff will be certified and eventually consist of a full-time administrator, a director, eleven teachers, eleven aides for grades K-6, seven preschool teachers, and specialty teachers on a limited basis. The school is primarily for families with above-average income and for children demonstrating above-average intelligence. Individuality and the use of progressive learning techniques and equipment will be stressed. The 170-185 day curriculum will be reviewed by the State. Year-round school will be provided if desired. The hours of operation will be 6:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m., much the same as a day-care facility. Each student will have parental drop-off and pickup. No bus service is provided. Daily traffic generation will be greater than an office -type use. The following is an approximate projection. 336 ADT 20,000 SF office (16.8 trips/1,000 SF) 750 ADT 300 -student private school (2.5 trips/students & staff) The trash enclosure and rooftop fan units will be incorporated into the stucco or masonry walls. Metal bands and the roof will accent the main structure. Colors should be decided prior to final approval so that the building aesthetically blends in with the rest of the buildings in the Planned Development. Access will be provided by a one-way, north to south drop-off area with twenty-eight staff and visitor parking stalls. The entry drive provides stacking for ten additional vehicles. This site is desirable to the applicant since special programs and activities will need additional parking stalls at night. Because most of the uses within this Planned Development take place during normal working hours, there should be the. ample room that the private school needs at night. Lot 2 Retail Area This lot with the most frontage along Highway 13 contains the supportive retail use for the entire Planned Development. 21,825 SF are proposed, providing the day to day services needed for the 267,000 SF development. This amounts to 8% of the entire building square footage for the Planned Development. A 6,200 SF restaurant would be the major anchor for the 3100 SF building and would be highly visible from Highway 13. A small 2800 SF auto center with four gas pump islands will be located near the two access points off of Silver Bell Road. Two service bays will be provided. The circulation system in this area, as well as the entire project, works well; each portion of the site can be reached without crossing through another area of unrelated use. The building itself will be architecturally the same on all four sides and similar to the large office/showroom buildings. All trash 2 SILVER BELL II GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan submitted by the developer proposes to install a retaining wall along the east property line, approximately 3 feet to 12 feet high. Staff recommends against the use of the retaining wall and recommends that the developer obtain a slope easement from the adjacent properties and regrade the area to match the elevations of the development. The final grading plan should incorporate the existing contours and the proposed contours for at least 200 feet adjacent to the proposed site. The proposed slope along the southerly property line adjacent tc Trunk Highway 13 exceeds the maximum allowable,3:1 slope criteria. Staff recommends the development obtain a slope easement from MN Dot to ensure compliance with the 3:1 maximum allowable slope. The existing 16" water main which was addressed in the March 18, 1987 staff report that is located approximately 10' south of the southerly property line does not appear to be impacted by the proposed grading. The. developer has petitioned the City to install the street and storm sewer system on Kennebec Drive from Seneca Road to Silver Bell Road. The storm sewer system will be designed to handle a portion of the storm water runoff from this development plus the adjoining properties to the east and south. The remaining portion of the runoff is directed towards State Trunk Highway 13 right-of-way. Storm water runoff into State highway right-of-way requires a permit from MN Dot. An erosion control plan with a narrative was submitted by Dallas Development as a part of their preliminary plat proposal. The following recommendation should be incorporated into their revised erosion control plan submittal. 1. Seeding and mulching specifications. 2. Change the inlet design to be silt fence and not hay bales. 3. Show the location of the rock construction access pad at the major ingress/egress point. Intersection berms will be sufficient for less active access routes to the site. 4. The silt fence should be trenched in and backfilled. Hay bales then would not be needed with the silt fence. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth has been provided along the north and west sides of the development. The existing 12" RCP sanitary sewer line that flows through the north edge of the development shall be tested before work has begun and after the construction is complete. If the existing 12" sanitary line is damaged, then the developer shall be responsible for repairing. will be enclosed in the building and no rooftop mechanical equipment will be visible. Staff recommends that all building -mounted signage be controlled by one sign company to create a more uniform sign band. Two hundred twenty-nine parking stalls have been directly designated for this portion of the site, meeting Code requirements. Lot 3 Office/Showroom This lot is designed for a 115,850 SF office showroom with 17,300 SF for office and 98,470 SF for showroom -type use. This is a 15/85 ratio. While the existing building was approved for a 50/50 ratio, the intended use will be for 20/80 office/showroom use. All parking requirements have been satisfied with two hundred forty-seven stalls. This building will be architecturally nearly the same as the existing office/showroom and treated the same on all exterior sides. Interior shipping and receiving areas will service the building. The: mechanical rooftop units will not be visible. 'Service access will be from Kennebec Drive and auto access is free flowing to any portion of the building. COMMENTS The project will be built basically in a single phase with completion emphasis on the private shcool. Detailed lighting and landscape plans will be required with the final plat submission for overall continuity. A signage package similar to the Auto Mall along Pilot Knob Road will also be required. 10 3 a This development shall be responsible for dedicating a minimum 20' utility easement over any public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. In areas where the utilities are greater than 20' deep, the easement width shall be increased to a minimum of 301. The development will be responsible for providing a 30' wide driveway easement along the lot lines common to Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block 2. No unusual permit requirements are anticipated beyond the normal MPCA, MWCC, and. Department of Health review for sanitary sewer and water main extensions. A permit is required from MN Dot to discharge storm water runoff into State right-of-way. ASSESSMENTS: The parcel proposed to be developed by Dallas Development Company as Silver Bell II was previously assessed for the following improvements. Project No. Description Usage 4 Sanitary Sewer Trunk 76 Water Lateral Benefit C/I 76 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit 86 Water Area C/I 94 Silver Bell Road Grading 128 Silver Bell Road Surfacing 274 Silver Bell Road Surfacing 428 Storm Sewer Trunk(A) C/I 15/179 Water Area C/I Waiver Storm Sewer Trunk(B) C/I Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit(B) (A) On Lot 1, Block 1 of Cedar Grove (B) On Lot 1, Block 1 of Silver Bell I The proposed development is subject to the pending assessments under City Project 495 which entails the streets and utility improvements to the proposed Kennebec Drive. The development will be subject to the following proposed assessments as a condition of .final plat approval. , Project No. Description Usage Rate Quantity Amount Storm Sewer Trunk C/I $.079/SF 548,020 SF $43,294 76 Water Lateral Benefit C/I 20.55/FF 549.03 11,283 Total $55,577 All final assessment rates shall be those in effect at the time of the final plat approval based on final plat area and frontage calculations. /W The existing 16" water main along the southeast edge of the development and the existing 8" water main at the intersection of Kennebec Drive and Seneca Road will supply adequate pressure and supply to the proposed development. The developer has petitioned the City to install the required trunk water main on Kennebec Drive from Seneca Road to Silver Bell Road and a trunk water main along the east right-of-way line of Silver Bell Road from Kennebec Drive to the existing water main along the northwest right-of-way line of Trunk Highway 13. The proposed trunk water main will benefit this development plus the future industrial developments to the west and east. The development proposes a 6" water main stub to serve proposed buildings A, B and C. This proposed 6" water main should be increased to an 8" and connected to the trunk water main proposed to be installed in Kennebec Drive. The development proposes to serve Lots 1, 2 and 3 with sanitary sewer from the existing 12" sanitary sewer in Kennebec Drive. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to this development is available from the in-place Silver Bell Road and the proposed Kennebec Drive. The developer has petitioned the City to construct Kennebec Drive from Seneca Road to Silver Bell Road. Silver Bell is presently a 44' wide pavement with a 9 ton design street. Kennebec Drive will be constructed to the same design criteria as Silver Bell Road. The completion of Kennebec Drive will improve the traffic circulation for the Cedar Industrial Park. The Silver Bell Road access to Trunk Highway 13 is the only signalized intersection to serve the Cedar Industrial Park. There are no traffic signals on Trunk Highway 13 at Seneca Road, Shawnee Road or Blackhawk Road. Staff recommends that the connection of Kennebec Drive to Silver Bell Road shall be at a right angle. Staff also recommends that the proposed driveway locations along Silver Bell Road will be at the same location as the driveways on the opposite side of the street. All entrances to the proposed development shall be 30' wide face to face of curb. Internal traffic circulation is provided by the use of 24' wide driving aisles. All the proposed lots in the development have access to public right-of-way but shared driveway easements will be required to promote the adequate traffic circulation throughout the site. Adequate turning radius has been provided for a tractor/trailer combination for proposed building C shipping and receiving yard. The receiving for proposed building B is not accessible to a tractor/trailer type unit. EASEMENT/RIGHT-OF-WAYS/PERMITS: This development shall dedicate a 40' half right-of-way for the construction of Kennebec Drive. CONDITIONS: 1) All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2) A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into and the site plan for three lots shall be followed. 3) This plat shall be subject to the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission for the dedication requirements. 4) An overall architectural theme will be adhered to with emphasis of uniformity in the office/showroom buildings and retail area. All exterior sides of the buildings will be constructed with the same material and look the same. 5) All trash shall be enclosed in the buildings. 6) An overall lighting and landscape plan shall be submitted on a grading plan. No lighting shall spill off-site. The financial guarantee for the landscaping shall not be released until one year after the installation date. 7) All Sign Ordinances and fees shall be adhered to. An overall signage plan shall be submitted with the final plat package. All building -mounted signage shall be consistant in size. Conditional Use Permits will be required for signs over 7' tall. 8) No rooftop mechanical units shall be visible. 9) 9' -wide parking stalls shall be approved. 10) The uses and ratios of use shall be the same as proposed in this report. 11) Staff recommends against the use of a retaining wall along the easterly property line. There exists a 12" sanitary sewer line in the same approximate location as the proposed retaining wall along the easterly property line of the development. 12) The developer shall be responsible to any damages to the existing 12" sanitary sewer during development. 13) Staff recommends that the proposed 6" internal water main stub which serves buildings A and B be replaced with an 8" water main which would connect the proposed water main in Silver Bell Road with the proposed water main in Kennebec Drive. 14) All entrances shall be 30' wide face to face at curb and in alignment with the adjacent property entrances. 15) Thi -s development shall dedicate a 40' half right-of-way for Kennebec Drive. 16) The development shall be responsible for dedicating the proper utility easements necessary to serve the site. 17) The development shall also dedicate a 30' wide driveway easement along the lot lines common to Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2. 18) The development shall be responsible for constructing concrete valley gutters across the entrance locations to this site. 19) The development shall be responsible for obtaining the appropriate regulatory agency permits required. 20) A revised erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted and approved by staff prior to grading permit issuance and final plat approval. 21)The development shall be responsible for the proposed assessments based on the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. /51 /J�7- 1 _^ s�IL tA >o � 0 Crr��c 5p Kis €€ ' / DALLAS DEVELOPMENT CO. SILVER BELL 11 m> < IA Irn n mz p� ii5�4s>- o�s s, ROAD S►LVEfL BELL til - 1 Y �� Vii' � (.}y�`� u a : n • n >I n K ^ Y ° it SILVER BELL II OWNER DALLAS DEVELOPMENT CO. /55 ` SILVER BELL II OWNER ®I EninNEl ? I, +r�M501n DALLAS DEVELOPMENT CO. e n a m m r- 0 0 Mi rr"A m N 0 Ln Mo r, Z > 0 z 0 z 0 15Z Pill ti SiJ1 ji k :-;Ili& H A 1; 1:Ji. 15Z ti SiJ1 ji k :-;Ili& H A MI 15Z m fn r- 0 M q p Lm 1 , I , I , I Y , I 1 r I II I I I I , I I I w I r i� ,r Ir i I 1 , 1 1 l.i .1 ' b I , I I 4 I I 1 I I E 1 Ir •It Ij I I I I l ti 4 I I I I 1 1 I ,u 1 1 1 , I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I .I 1 I , 1 , I I I , i; I 1 1 1 I � I I I I 11 II 1 it , 1 II 1 , 1 it 1 , �7t 7t 71 1 iu www cs�c S'v+ S� i� V>f H n E Qi ° zT °_° �' >�-g �; . �' >:z r a 7 IclO= 'd. i C E it !! P". !ƒ)' C") la 6 40 - 0 _"r_ � is:ice _ 1 ._•_ _. - IhGU� : R — -- _ •' , �/, 725%74.0 U 69.0/70.0 85 J 75:3%760 r. 97 '" `'• i35 12"/ 134_" 1337.00 1t2. 7.0/63 �n 950 50 -10 Tom/ /"• '•, �f 1 FARC p136": 0 ........_ 50.4 . I51.. 8rr city of eagan r PUBLIC 1- WORKS DEPARTMENT J44 6/72-0 SILVER BELL It 73.3/74.0 95 7_ SUBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN .4 -. ` A FIG. --3 approved:- standard plate #: -- CEI A -o A - b "� � /`� � 0 �' ,C � � 796. A- e f 802. A-kk A -h 4�AP-38 AP -39 ! 839.8 ( 703: _A-nh ...? `.. 0. I .. is A-9 E .816.Z7En rA-mm BIB. 8._?8013 _ a• - `_ !�� `` •'• hA D•0 �� •• 12 ^' Edi ��:.`�^>' 's •,� .•���- �,..r'S' .` r� _'T. ,f AP-3�`:> j`, • ^��'�.; .y �. �. , % ' \, a V_:.:.. -8038 �•., .:.._ A-dam�� A -k,.. -800.686 Ap- � +, G•. m ; • �lT, i`. _r�i � 856 795.5 �..% •m 1 _) r— I _i ��:•� ,`—A-V ni .; A___: i > ! . + —n 804.2 E A -nn a a AP-4�i�•i s_r' A -v - _886.619 0 3 % j :A P- 3 __. i AP -35 , 6 i83 ,. 6 -1 A -x 8860 - SILVER BELL II SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. *1 city - - of ea an standard PUBLIC STORM SEWER approvedplate: JJ WORKS )62, DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN , - ................ /63 1 1 I 1 , 1 , ............ ............ .......... r 11 D m 1 , ID m r I 1 1 l I , � , 1 1I II m D ii Z m � rn 1 1 I A 00 O 1 1 1 1 O CiJ N O i � (n 1 , 1 I II 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 � I t 1 t 1 1 1 I 1 1 I II i I tel' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� 1, �1 1� 1 11 I , - ................ /63 APC Minutes June 23, 1987 5. A 12 inch watermain and an 8 inch sanitary sewer shall be included with the improvements to Yankee Doodle Road east of Minnesota Highway #149. 6. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the time frame requirements of the affected agencies. 7. An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted before a grading permit is issued or before final plat is -approved. 8. The development shall be responsible for all proposed assessment obligations based on rates in effect at the time of final plat approval and on final plat dimensions and areas. 9. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to on Lot 5, Block 1. 10. The landscape plan shall be submitted on a grading plan. The financial guarantee shall not be released until one year after the -installation date. 11. No roof top fan units shall be visible from the residential property to the north and Yankee Doodle Road on the south. All voted yes. SILVER BELL 2ND ADDITION — COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mr. Hall then convened the last public hearing of the evening in regard to the separate applications of Dallas Development for the rezoning of 25.35 Light Industrial acres to a mixed use Planned Development district that include the existing 8.3 acre parcel, and a preliminary plat consisting of 3 lots on 17.05 acres, together with a conditional use permit for motor fuel sales. The site is located along the west side of Highway #13 and is bisected by Silver Bell Road. Mr. Runkle indicated that the Land Use Plan designates the area as Industrial, requiring an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan. He also advised that the applicant had previously been before the Planning Commission and had acquired additional land, allowing revisions to the plat which they wanted to present to the Advisory Planning Commission. Mr. Bernie Frey was present on behalf of the developer, indicating that a private school (Tesseract) of approximately 20,000 -square feet, would comprise one lot with a 30,000 square foot retail center on the second lot and a 115,000 square foot office showroom on the third lot. He indicated that service bays would be provided in conjunction with the gas pumps. /o/ 12 APC Minutes June 23, 1987 Mr. Frank Martin was present on behalf of Educational Alternatives, the proposed owner of the school site. Member Gustafson suggested that 10 foot parking stalls should be provided in retail areas which would be consistent with the policy described by City Planner Runkle to allow 9 foot stalls for employees only. Pursuant to Mr. Voracek's questions, Mr. Colbert advised that the watermain issue had been resolved. In response to member Trygg's questions, Mr. Runkle indicated that the major difference in the proposal was that it now requested a planned development which would tie down miscellaneous uses. Mr. Runkle advised member McCrea that an EAW was not required. Member Harrison requested and received confirmation that the service bays would be owned by the same owner as the gas pumps. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning. All voted in favor. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of •the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into and the site plan for three lots shall be followed. 3. This plat shall be subject to the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission for the dedication requirements. 4. An overall architectural theme will be adhered to with emphasis of uniformity in the office/showroom buildings and retail area. All exterior sides of the buildings will be constructed with the same material and look the same. 5. All trash shall be enclosed in the buildings. 6. An overall lighting and landscape plan shall be submitted on a grading plan. No lighting shall spill off-site. The financial guarantee for the landscaping shall not be released until.one year after the installation date. 7. All Sign Ordinances and fees shall be adhered to. An overall signage plan shall be submitted with the final plat package. All building -mounted signage shall be consistent in size. Conditional use permits will be required for signs over 7 feet tall. 8. No rooftop mechanical units shall be visible. 9. 10 foot wide parking stalls shall be required in retail areas, and the school parking requirements shall be reviewed and approved by City staff. 1�5 "dd 13 APC Minutes June 23, 1987 10. The uses and ratios of use shall be the same as proposed in this report. 11. Staff recommends against the use of a retaining wall along the easterly property line. There exists a 12 inch sanitary sewer line in the same approximate location as the proposed retaining wall along the easterly property line of the development. 12. The developer shall be responsible for any damages to the existing 12 inch sanitary sewer during development. 13. Staff recommends that the proposed 6 inch internal water main stub which serves buildings A and B be replaced with an 8 inch water main which would connect the proposed water main in Silver Bell Road with the proposed water main in Kennebec Drive. 14. All entrances shall be 30 feet wide face to face at curb and in alignment with the adjacent property entrances. _.15. This development shall dedicate a 40 foot half right-of-way for Kennebec Drive. 16. The development shall be responsible for dedicating the proper utility easements necessary to serve the site. 17. The development shall also dedicate a 30 foot wide driveway easement along the lot lines common to Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 2. 18. The development shall be responsible for constructing concrete valley gutters across the entrance locations to this site. 19. The development shall be responsible for obtaining the appropriate regulatory agency permits required. 20. A revised erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted and approved by staff prior to grading permit issuance and final plat approval. 21. The development shall be responsible for the proposed assessments based on the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. 22. The developer shall provide a more perpendicular access from Kennebec onto Silver Bell Road approved by City staff. 23. The developer shall enter into an agreement running with the land, providing that motor fuel sales shall be allowed only as long as the service bays are operational on a regular daily basis. 24. The traffic circulation within the development shall continue in perpetuity as provided in the Planned Development Agreement and its exhibits. /66 14 APC Minutes June 23, 1987 All voted in favor. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend a conditional use permit for motor fuel sales. All voted yes. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend amendment of the Comprehensive Guide Plan. All voted aye. MODEL HOMES It was noted that there were applications from the developers of Lexington Pointe for six (6), Bridle Ridge for twelve (12), Brittany 10th for one (1), and Country Hollow for six (6) model homes. Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the construction of model homes by the developers in the above- described additions, subject to the installation and approval of all utilities. All voted in favor except Hall who abstained, to avoid any - appearance of potential conflict of interest due to financial interest in the Bridle Ridge Addition. LAUKKA-BECK City Planner Dale'Runkle advised the Commission that a meeting had been held with all the players in the Laukka-Beck Planned Development who had agreed to cooperate in a traffic analysis and continuance of the various applications pending completion of such analysis. ADJOURNMENT Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 11:50 p.m. All voted yea. +• + DGK Secretary - APC /67 15 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLATZJEAN ADDITION J. Rezoning of .84 Acres from A to R-2, and .72 A to R-1 and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of Two Lots Located South of Rings Road --A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting held on June 23, 1987, to consider an application submitted by Wayne Murphy requesting a rezoning of .84 Agricultural acres to an R-2 district and .72 A -containing a single family home into an R-1 district located south of the Vienna Woods Addition. The 1987 land use map designates this area R-1; an amendment will not be required since this 1.56 acre plat has the density of 1.92 units per acre. The APC is recommending approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For a copy of the Planning and Engineering report on this item, refer to pages _through 74. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a cash donation in lieu of parkland dedication. For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page(s)1;70/ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning and A to R-2 and A to R-1, and a preliminary plat entitled Jean Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT (JEAN ADDITION) APPLICANT: WAYNE MURPHY LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 31 EXISTING ZONING: AG(AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 23, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 8, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Wayne Murphy requesting a rezoning of .84 agricultural acres to an R-2 (double) district and .72 agricultural acres containing a single family home into an R-1 district located south of the Vienna Woods Addition and north of Interstate 35E. The January 1987 Land Use map designates this area R-1 (0-3 units acre); an Amendment will not be required since this 1.56 acre plat has a density of 1.92 units/acre. COMMENTS: Lot 6, Block 6 of the Vienna Woods addition to the north contains a duplex. The land to the south and west is agriculturally zoned or MN. Dot R.O.W. The existing home is serviced by City utilities and meets all R-1 standards. The newly created duplex_ lot meets the R-2 lot requirements of 100' width at the setback line (30' from the Kings Road property line) and 15,000 S.F. min. lot size. GRADING, DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL: No proposed grading, drainage, erosion control plan was submitted with the preliminary plat proposal. The site does offer a buildable lot without the need for grading to establish a building pad. The lots are large enough that no drainage problems should arise from the construction of a single family unit. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water service are readily available in Kings Road. Under City contract, water and sanitary sewer service stubs were provided for the existing home on proposed Lot 1. The services provided cross proposed Lot 2. Therefore, a cross utility easement will be needed. STREETS, ACCESS, CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed lots is readily available from Kings Road. 141 RIGHT-OF-WAYS, EASEMENTS, PERMITS: The Vienna Woods plat does not show that the required right-of-way for Kings Road was obtained from the proposed site. A utility easement across proposed Lot 2 will be required for the services to proposed Lot 1. No regulatory agency permit requirements are anticipated other than the City permits for excavation in City right-of-way and utility hook-ups. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed parcel was assessed for sanitary sewer trunk, water area, storm sewer trunk (large lot assessment), and street (residential equivalent) at the single family rate under Project #259. There are no assessments pending and the following assessment is proposed as a condition of final plat approval: PROJECT # DESCRIPTION USAGE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 259 Storm Sewer Trunk SF .053/SF 41,267 $2,187.00 The final assessment amount will be determined using the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval and based upon final plat dimensions and area. CONDITIONS: (JEAN ADDITION) 1) All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2) The duplex lot shall have separate utility services going into each unit. 3) The duplex setback along Kings Road shall match that of the one on Lot 6, Block 6, Vienna Woods addition. ••s 4) This plat shall be subject,to a cash parks dedication fee. 5) Sanitary sewer and water service must be provided to each lot of the proposed plat. - 6) A utility easement for sanitary sewer and water service to proposed Lot 1 shall be dedicated across proposed Lot 2. 7) The proposed plat shall dedicate the proper right-of-way for Kings Road. 8) The development shall be responsible for the additional storm sewer assessment based on the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval and on final plat areas. /11 `C '°r•rs J; 0 • r�N /! j V �� �A ZS ,{ p y D t O w1,0w oz. O /b . 0000 0000, 00001 00'001 ,2701 A� 1 •Y off• ,\\-� L kJ a n ° e y b \ t t I+ Nvmwgw C7 a� °�• y N a i 7 `��_- 1_ III 1C O �I. Yi • ry G • ^ y~� V 4 001 SOMI X0011 rI• .1'021 ot R A A .0 01 G•1IO0i1aSR00 CC •1J 'i �// ti wA n 81� •rti O `�'•`:�S X1Yow W ' «IY /00,041 � 08 :►�`\ r�` ' a 1" e ~�a N - ` of V S •� 4�.`•h•1�1 f 1 w1Y0N e ,n '4 0. Dur fns\ of �f1g n "a'L ta! •S 1 n S � - N, ~, p y0 c°2r `P •.2b re, ar, �.-gyS��^�'• INt$- IR o 'era ar ♦ �d °pj o �ti• R oi.ZM •1 8' w. 1", `� Ao cn• 10 _ .� 1 L.,, •zee a .1 n _ n n S. •o n "1 ti°r # �/ y- -.00 a M~I i i0 ii SI'17 R'\II 00I•..'.' Y JC r 5 04 g ••Ow/y ,vcn as'u J: Is ,� Oi w on 20111 K•ICI ^O D.1 1 Q .Z1a1 w *t q MINOM . Is n 0 pp •a N o c• 2^ 4Y►1 m. a oc 0, • 00•1�<;p�ri •¢ aye .o °car• $ ,. lYON n ♦ O� °04 =� A •o w4 00 !• NOCI <� Ed 00..0. gNpo S 0A•-.i[r 4 W W lYDM q K! I a 1 $��•. M e OM �I rn-I a n 8 a '�• Op�T . O Q 001.1 .9 S. 8 /S 8 y\cod R o N O OrF btc+ 'IQ e I • _. OD"2►1 12111 d 10'IS! a M • u o �' "Q S.CCZ " •FO.oZ.ON _ r Z 00-2.1 ,0 AI a n •n a so. N . • • W w Z n 10'1C! _ sI �:: y m S N '.a a r� � j G". Fw'w a» ,l�fi w,iO,o ■ > ' 00 Z.1 00' w 1YOM :YON O[ oc `,� a oc oc - ' o N o° ^IS o .1r-�i rc11r I Y1P c a'1d I 00 2.1 00tH 1 0G•000 'q N • OC ,I LOM CD 00 %Is R �bO�. aF. • wl� N� 0o w oo n u a oo a 10�l: I caa .!' �o'u1 .0 .11.0 oo u I .: 7/ Z. DESCRIPTION That part of the Northeast Quarter (N.E.g) of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 27 North, Range 23 West, as shown as Parcel 34 on the plat as Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 19-18 on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in anA fuer Dakota County. Minnesota. iii E7ni ni n BLOCK 6 N. E.I/4.SE.1/4 Sewer and Water are in Kings Road Area of Lot 1 - .722 acres Area of Lot 2 - . 839 acres Total acres of plat - 1.56 fR�rrEfY:�D,;r�It � d �►�7 V N �- 0- so /ooh 4 3 P� Scale 1 inch 5( 9r I^ 1 n I -7 1 JIv v v UTILITY 8r` I"A - EASEMENT _ 0 I Itrreby certify that this survey, plan, X r_oorr was prepared by me or under my •itroct supervision and that I am a duly ticnzstercd Laud Surveyor under the laws do Sr _ u of uteeottaa./ / Data Hl Req. No. 10:60 0 m n 889.3 AP-49 900.0 - 881.7 \ i ... 88s�2. AP-11 889.2 __ ' - �- ------ AP-25 - 894.7 C\j/ 880.5 1 r AP-50 888.5 = ; ?, 886.0 SAP-42 89 4 O :. Nt' �Y 7 --....... ' .: 908.20 � ��%� �' A9 214 _ AP- 919.3 T= ` T _ I _ 915 9 A- f = 9/80 �0.: ti ,.__......__A AP=;_. P= 2 9i 12 - 930a .6 ` ` _ 9!6'.0 . % - =:920, '� �' AP .i, ,,>=Q 938.8 :-- -t�: -...;� 920.0 ; =a 9 9260 .: ,�1.. .z..,-.. --� ... A R 08.8 24. r -, , ,�./ j . ,. i 9 ,�•'•t • f \ �.,- ",�j' ,- � 926 �2 925 5 ......... 4P-34.. -- ,; ,... 934.0 ,j AP _. 938.8 , 926 0 • H i 940.5 / D` ,J —_....� - 49 — _ ��, 0 ;�i : •�;:.� >3�A-J Y AP-33 -� f -- 980.0 ..' 985.3 , A z z city of eagan r PUBLIC WORKS -- = DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL JEAN ADDITION! STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN FIG. #1 approved: Standard plate #: U7 0 Ln m rn m a m n .4 m c CD z a m A b/1'3'S'b/1"3'N au!I M 4 L m z Q 0 O z 7 't t0, K w M O i cu d m b Ir 0 O m ct i? a� ��C. o d m m ct .+ O 1 I 0 H Vj 0 U] C O 0 m - _� Cr) -Sc* D CO y w O Ow Y i <,3 m�IQ ch = iy ct 0 m b H cr A m d b m r o H a ro rro �7 q 3 e+ m to W ctV. B 10 e 0 cot O ct m 4 01 m O H Cil m h ..ter _ .-. n O 4 L m z Q 0 O z 7 't t0, K w M O i cu d m b Ir 0 O m ct i? y d0 o d m m ct .+ O o '1 ct 0 H Vj 0 U] C O 0 m -Sc* CO y w O Ow Y i O ch = iy ct 0 m b H cr A m d b m r o H a ro rro �7 q 3 e+ m to W ctV. B O e 0 cot O ct m 4 01 m O H Cil m h ..ter _ .-. b 0 W H <+ m O h rnv ct. cot h x zm � M- is m in z04V• w Dl � D � H �0 ct o i p m 0 W H O M 0 e ct H cd H 'L1 O m w y 0 N p cF O F O � X C. m z 'v 0 z x 'z Gil" [� - -,.l ICU tp --i 0. ..:...: tX tj �CD x CDm m D n co m CD z IC) _ 9i X C1 D m D b/1 3'S'b/I 3'N aull M 1-q00'ZSZ' — — M.E £ ,ONr-- Im N H p C. m z 'v 0 z x 'z Gil" [� - -,.l I I '�v tp ..:...: tX tj � x 0I °• 10 co •� Imil 3�' IC) _ 9i C1 cit oCu C. m z 'v 0 z x 'z Gil" [� - -,.l I I '�v —7 ..:...: tX tj � x °• N C1 cit C) a a tX tj � x °• N C1 cit oCu N 0 b ti Im N H p ty o cr p X N co O ct CD P. C C] H co o a m m z ca c H ct, m ct CD t7 b m n m N N. O m 9 o cr CID Ct. P. O fD N ct cr ct N 0 h ppmtt 1-1 C o N W _ v A 0 M X h W rn WFC z D r " + ct§ D M m ct, H 4 fD h o ch I CD m N c+ H O w p o 0 ul /� O 0 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING — EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA JUNE 23, 1987 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, June 23, 1987 at 7:OO.p.m. at the Eagan. Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Hall, Members Gustafson, Voracek, Trygg, Wilkins, McCrea and Harrison. Absent was alternate member Krisnik. Also present were City Planner Dale Runkle, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch and Assistant City Attorney David Keller. AGENDA Mr. Runkle suggested that the Commission could be updated by staff on the status of the Cray Addition, Northwest Airlines, Wachovia, all within the Laukka-Beck PUD. Voracek moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the agenda with an addition for an update in regard to the Laukka-Beck Planned Development. All voted yes. MINUTES Mr. Keller advised the Commission that the minutes of the May 26, 1987 meeting incorrectly indicated that the vote in regard to the Cray Addition on page 15 was unanimous. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the minutes of May 26, 1987 with the correction that the vote was 5 to 2 in regard to the Cray Addition, with Harrison and Wilkins voting nay. All voted yes. JEAN ADDITION REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall then convened the first public hearing of the evening in regard to the application of Mr. Wayne Murphy requesting a rezoning of .84 Agricultural acres to an R-2 (Double) district and .72 Agricultural acres containing a single family home, into an R-1 district, located south of the Vienna Woods Addition and north of I - 35E. Mr. Runkle introduced the request for the parcel which is designated R-1 (0-3 units per acre) in the January 1987 Land Use Map. Mr. Murphy was present and answered questions. Mr. Dick Kreitz indicated no opposition to the proposal, although he did question whether some type of variance was required due to the location relative to the freeway. /76 1 _ APC Minutes June 23, 1987 Mr. Colbert advised that MnDOT had originally acquired the property, intending to remove the home. However, when the location of the freeway was finalized, they sold the parcel back to the owner with the understanding that any proposed buyer of the remaining vacant land would be aware of the location of the freeway. Pursuant to member Wilkins questions, Mr. Runkle advised that the proposed duplex lot could be split for individual ownership. Mr. Murphy indicated his acceptance of the staff report and conditions upon inquiry by member McCrea. McCrea moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning of 1.56 acres to .84 acres of R-2 and .72 acres of R- 1. All voted yea. McCrea moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. •2. The duplex lot shall have separate utility services going into each unit. 3. The duplex setback along Kings Road shall match that of the one on Lot 6, Block 6, Vienna Woods Addition. 4. This plat shall be subject to a cash parks dedication fee. 5. Sanitary sewer and water service must be provided to each lot of the proposed plat. 6. A utility easement for sanitary sewer and water service to proposed Lot 1 shall be dedicated across proposed Lot 2. 7. The proposed plat.shall dedicate the proper right-of-way for Kings Road. 8. The development shall be responsible for the additional storm sewer assessment based on the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval and on final plat areas. It was noted that this item would be heard by the City Council on July 7, 1987. All voted in favor. 177 2 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 PINE RIDGE ADDITIONZREZONING_&PRELIMINARY PLAT R. Rezoning of Approximately 2.6 Acres of the Pine Ridge Addition from A to R-1 and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 7 Lots --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on June 23, 1987, to consider a rezoning and preliminary plat application for -a development entitled Pine Ridge Addition consisting of a 2.6 acre rezoning from A to R-1 and a 7 lot preliminary plat. The APC is recommending approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For a copy of the staff report regarding the rezoning and preliminary plat for Pine Ridge Addition, refer to pages through . The Parks and Recreation advisory commission is recommending a cash donation for this plat in lieu of parkland dedication. For a copy of the APC action on both the rezoning and preliminary plat, refer to pages��through_Zq. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R-1 and preliminary plat entitled Pine Ridge Addition. 11 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT,(PINE RIDGE ADDITION APPLICANT: WENDELL E. CARLSON LOCATION: SW 1/4 SECTION 15 EXISTING ZONING: A(AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 23, 1987 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 9, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of 2.6 A(Agricultural) acres to an R-1 (single family) district and a preliminary plat for the Pine Ridge Addition consisting of 7 single family lots on the west side of Kolstad Road and south of Crestridge Lane. This plat is in conformance with the current Land Use map. COMMENTS: This site is primarily open grassland with a wooded pine knoll along the western property line in the north central portion of the plat. Virtually all of the pines will be saved with this proposal, however, the developer is proposing to relocate some so all lots have similar trees and an overall design theme. The Hidden Oaks Townhomes are to the north, Timbershore Quads are to the east, a single family residence on agricultural land is to the south and the 17 single family lot Pinecrest Addition is to the west. Six lots have access onto Kolstad Lane, 4 having lot lines nearly matching those of the.Pinecrest Addition. Lot 7 will have access onto Crestridge Lane. A 30' building set backs will be required along Crestridge Lane. The lots meet R-1 size and width requirements and no variances are requested. Lots 1-5 and 7 are 85' wide at the setback line and corner lot 7 is 130' and 90' wide along the streets. The square footage ranges from 12,019 - 18,309 S.F. Since one builder is doing the construction, individual lot grading will occur for these custom built homesites. 17i PINE RIDGE ADDITION GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading plan for the proposed Pine Ridge Addition shows a filling of Lot 7. This filling of Lot 7 is consistent with the proposed filling of Lot 17 of the adjacent Pine Crest of Eagan Addition. The grading plan for Lots 2-6 shows the front yard drainage directed to the existing constructed Kolstad Road with the back yard drainage directed to the common lot lines and then conveyed along the common lot lines to the street. Staff advises that the grading for Lot 1 be revised to convey the back yard drainage to a common side lot line and then to the street instead of directing the back yard drainage to the southerly adjacent property. No additional storm sewer is required to adequately serve the proposed seven lot Pine Ridge Addition. No erosion and sediment control plan was submitted with the preliminary plat. Staff recommends that an erosion and sediment control plan including both a site plan and narrative be submitted and approved by staff prior to grading permit issuance or final plat approval. UTILITIES: The sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size, capacity and depth are readily available in Crestridge Lane and Kolstad Road. Sanitary sewer and water service has been provided to Lots 2, 3, 5 and 6. Lots 1 and 4 will receive their sanitary sewer and water service from the existing utilities in Kolstad Road. Sanitary sewer and water service to Lot 7 can be provided from either the existing utilities in Kolstad Road or the existing utilities in Crestridge Lane. The development proposes to take the water service for Lot 7 from Crestridge Lane and the sanitary sewer service from Kolstad Road. Staff advises against two street cuts where one cut providing both services would be sufficient. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to the proposed seven lot Pine Ridge Addition is readily available from either Kolsted Road or Crestridge Lane. The way the lots are set up is that Lot 7 will take its driveway access from Crestridge Lane and Lots 1 - 6 will take their driveway access from Kolstad Road. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAYS/PERMITS: No additional right-of-way for Crestridge Lane or Kolstad Road will be required as a condition of this development. No permit requirements are anticipated beyond the normal City of Eagan permits required for work within the public right-of-way. and water and sewer hookups. ASSESSMENTS: The proposed development was previously assessed for the following items: IN* Project No. Description Usage 58 Sanitary Sewer Trunk 58 Water Area Single Family 90 Street Surfacing 77 Storm Sewer Trunk Multi(A) (A) 75,000 square feet of parcel was assessed storm sewer trunk under Project 77. There are no assessments pending on the proposed site and the following assessment is proposed as a condition of final plat approval. Project No. Description Usage Rate Quantity Amount 77 Storm Sewer Trunk Single Family $.0534/SF 122,038 SF $6,468 All final assessment rates shall be those in effect at the time of the final plat approval based on final plat area. CONDITIONS: PINE RIDGE ADDITION 1) All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2) 30' building setbacks along Crestridge Lane shall be maintained. 3) This plat shall be subject to a cash Parks dedication fee. 4) The development shall be responsible for providing water and sanitary sewer service to each individual lot. 5) The grading plan for Lot 1 of the proposed Pine Ridge Addition shall be modified to direct all back yard and side yard drainage along the common lot lines and not onto the adjacent southerly property. 6) An erosion and sediment control plan including both a site map and a narrative shall be submitted and approved by staff before a grading permit is issued or the final plat is approved. LII I � I -. L_r- pI N, :'R L17-- 51 L LIi'1' 14 714 1V r�IF 1I jIi_�i I, I NORTH 51H.0 1 _ ! BI L OI C K N I lCA + I •� I N� C) I r Ej El 1-1 �M Cl + SOUTH 518.0 + KOLSTAD v ROAD �= M �— cK x � 1 z I a Kr LII I � I -. L_r- pI N, :'R L17-- 51 L LIi'1' 14 714 1V r�IF 1I jIi_�i I, I NORTH 51H.0 1 _ ! BI L OI C K N I lCA + I •� I N� C) I r Ej El 1-1 �M Cl + SOUTH 518.0 + KOLSTAD v ROAD �= M �— N, PINE RIDGE ALDITION Ju! ` PRELIMINARY PLAT SME PUN James R. 1 Iill� inc- a roe ---' PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS rI A ENDELL CARLSON �oolAAea.ar ac s,eta�+�oL raex+.� jos 1942 Mo CANTM• ROAD. KAOAN• YII �— w cK r—T-- 1 �� �s I Kr `�+�� ✓. � ,may H_D 0 N, PINE RIDGE ALDITION Ju! ` PRELIMINARY PLAT SME PUN James R. 1 Iill� inc- a roe ---' PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS rI A ENDELL CARLSON �oolAAea.ar ac s,eta�+�oL raex+.� jos 1942 Mo CANTM• ROAD. KAOAN• YII �— w cK r—T-- .. E �� �s I Kr H_D 0 m2 ym f 4 I �J z 9 N, PINE RIDGE ALDITION Ju! ` PRELIMINARY PLAT SME PUN James R. 1 Iill� inc- a roe ---' PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS rI A ENDELL CARLSON �oolAAea.ar ac s,eta�+�oL raex+.� jos 1942 Mo CANTM• ROAD. KAOAN• YII �— w .. E N, PINE RIDGE ALDITION Ju! ` PRELIMINARY PLAT SME PUN James R. 1 Iill� inc- a roe ---' PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS rI A ENDELL CARLSON �oolAAea.ar ac s,eta�+�oL raex+.� jos 1942 Mo CANTM• ROAD. KAOAN• YII �— w �lit �4 'r 3 t \. 1 -T ti~ u � JI 1 `KOLSTAD ROAD�— � w r vi I �—T ci a mo o � n O Z ' IC r w r :3 w r '-H 2 A IS >\ 1z 30I( $5 qvkb.� . 33'1 r — T C=J C -HI ej —18 N3. 33 m 'm PINE RIDGE ADDITION SUBJECT PARCEL ................ ................ city of eagan STORM SEWER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN FIG. #1 approved: standard I plate 4;: :x_ - = )amen R. Hill, inc. LIMINAR PL PREwAT / SITE PLAN _ t ra. PLANNERS /ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS ,S A I WENDELL`ARLSON nxoora.m.ar ..ty.uno�:ioa .w v+a.avauti�on cyo� _ r—T-- I y� P:2Ma K� 4V- 1>n D ' ;= i>—�--_J 4 r o ,Q., _ 1010 2 V - = )amen R. Hill, inc. LIMINAR PL PREwAT / SITE PLAN _ t ra. PLANNERS /ENGINEERS /SURVEYORS ,S A I WENDELL`ARLSON nxoora.m.ar ..ty.uno�:ioa .w v+a.avauti�on June 18, 1987 TO: EAGAN CITY COUNCIL Beatta Blomquist Thomas Egan Vic Ellison James Smith Ted Wachter FROM: Adeline Grieser - Eagan resident RE: Rezoning Pine Ridge Addition from Agricultural to R-1, single family - June 23, 1987 As I will be out of town the evening of this meeting, I hope one of the council members will read this aloud. I live directly across the street from this parcel of land. I've watched for 14 years are the council voted more and more land rezoned from agricultural to residential. Like a cancerous disease, it has crept ever closer, squeezing out the wildlife, the birds, the pine and oak trees, the prairie grasses. Under the guise of progress and development the very contour of Eagan is being destroyed. IF it continues, all the hills, and mounds and moraines will disappear, and a flat, ugly scene will take the place of a once lush and green river valley. Have you seen what the "developer" has done to the property just adjacent to this parcel? Have you watched (as I have) the earth movers and bull dozers destroy the shape of the land? Isn't it time to stop? It is a privilege and honor to hold office and have the power to vote changes, and make decisions -- but it must be used for the good of all the people, not only the developers. Each one of you has the power to say NO! Do you have the guts and gumption to say NO? I appeal to your sense of fairness and for the right of the wildlife, the trees and the grasses to survive in Eagan too. Saying YES to this rezoning makes the Eagan symbol of the Mighty Oak tree just a joke. Sin erely, Mrs. Adeline Grieser Eagan, MN (452-5950) work ��7 a APC Minutes June 23, 1987 PINE RIDGE ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The second public hearing of the evening was in regard to the separate applications of Mr. Wendell E. Carlson requesting a rezoning of 2.6 Agricultural acres to R-1 single family and a preliminary plat for Pine Ridge Addition, consisting of 7 single family lots on the west side of Kolstad Road and south of Crestridge Lane. City Planner Runkle introduced the applications which were in conformance with the current Land Use Map involvinq. a site of primarily open grassland with a wooded pine knoll along the western property line in the north central portion of the plat. It was noted that the developer intended to save virtually all of the pine trees and may relocate some. The applicant was available for questions and there was no one from the public to respond. In response to a letter from a neighboring land owner, Mr. Gustafson advised that denying any type of development of the land was not an option for the City government. Mr. Foertsch advised member Wilkins that Lot 7 was to be filled, which would be compatible with the filing of the lot adjacent and north of it. Wilkins moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend rezoning of the parcel from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family). All voted aye. Wilkins moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 2. Thirty foot building setbacks.along Crestridge Lane shall be maintained. 3. This plat shall be subject to a cash parks dedication fee. 4. The development shall be responsible for providing, water and sanitary sewer service to each individual lot. 5. The grading plan for Lot 1 of the proposed Pine Ridge Addition shall be modified to direct all back yard and side yard drainage along the common lot lines and not onto the adjacent southerly property. 6. An erosion and sediment control plan including both a site map and a narrative shall be submitted and approved by staff before a grading permit is issued or the final plat is approved. 7. Lot 7 shall take water and sanitary sewer service from Crestridge Lane. 8. This development shall obligations. assume its additional assessment /d 3 APC Minutes June 23, 1987 9. Any relocated pine trees shall be replaced if lost within one year of moving the same. It was noted that the developer had agreed to the 9th condition. All voted in favor. This item is also to be scheduled for the July 7, 1987 council meeting. MANOR LAKE ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing in regard to the separate applications of Middlemist Properties requesting the rezoning of 43.12 Agricultural acres to R-1 single family district and a preliminary plat for the Manor Lake Addition. This plat consists of 64 lots abutting Cliff Road on the north and Highway #3 on the east. Dale Runkle described the proposal which is consistent with the City's January 1987 Land Use Plan and had deleted any request for Commercial zoning from previous application. He also indicated that the Park Department would be reviewing this plat on July 2, 1987. Mr. Robert Middlemist was present hold off on the construction of the park land until sales of the first construction. He also requested a conjunction with the building permit family home on the oversized lot in the cartway access to Cliff Road. and expressed the desire to street south of the proposed three phases mandated such temporary septic system in for construction of a single northwest with a 16 foot In response to his concerns in regard to assessments for the construction of a turn lane on Cliff Road where it accesses Highway #3, Mr. Colbert advised that only a residential equivalent rate would apply for assessments. A homeowner to the north expressed concern as to the values of the homes which the developer indicated would be $90,000.00 to $200,000.00. Mr. Colbert responded that water levels in the pond were controlled. He also indicated that some trunk water and sewer assessments may be incurred by property owners to the north, as a result of construction to facilitate this development. Mr. Roger Weierke, 630 Cliff Road, expressed concern as to the ability to obtain access to the 16 foot cartway, in addition to the installation of water service. Mr. Colbert explained that the proposed plat included -an exception along the west side between parcels to the north and south, which were included in the plat. It appeared that Outlot A was being proposed so that if the exception was incorporated into the plat, the proper size lots could be developed. It was also noted that the northwesterly parcel was to be eventually replatted into three individual single family lots. /Y/ - o.&- — 4 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 VARIANCE%VAN EECKHOUT BUILDING CORPORATION FOR CHATTERTON PONDS L. Variance for VanEeckhout Building Corporation to Encroach into Easement at Lot 2, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds --The City has received a request for a variance from VanEeckhout Building Corporation to allow the encroachment into an easement at Lot 2, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds for the construction of a home at that location. For additional 'information on this item, refer to the Planning Department Report enclosed on pages - through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance for VanEeckhout Building Corporation as requested. /�D CITY OF RAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: VAN EECKHOUT BUILDING CORPORATION (GENE BANGASSER) LOCATION: LOT 12, BLOCK 1, CHATTERTON PONDS EXISTING ZONING: R-1 SINGLE FAMILY DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 7,,1987 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 29, 1987 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting an 8' variance that would allow the construction of a deck on the rear of•a proposed house to protrude 8' into an existing easement. PLANNER COMMENTS: Van Eeckhout Building Corporation is presently preparing plans for the construction of a house on Lot 12, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds Addition (1355 Chatterton Road). In amenity to this house is a deck which if constructed would protrude 8' into an existing easement. The purpose of this easement is for ponding, drainage, and includes a sanitary sewer line which runs approximately 10' from the property line and extends parallel along the easement through the property. The proposed deck would come within 2' of the sanitary sewer line. The applicant argues that this variance and easement encroachment is necessary to place a sufficiently large and expensive house on a complimentary lot. The lot is such shape and size that placement of the house with deck will not meet set back requirements. 4. 7 11 CONDITIONS: The property owner will be responsible for all damages incurred to the property and building given the need to exercise the drainage, ponding, and utility easement. The property owner will also be responsible for -damage caused to public facilities in the placement, maintenance, and/or removal of the deck. SVEYQR } �+Jl T1FICATE. van ECKHOUT BLDG. CORP. r 110.00• S89.43'16°E 10 �i W 10 9 � r LOT 12� U - zi ps9'1►Z3 `� � w � i \i iA N d� 149,1 NT�•a�2 \ i )% r DRO.INAC-41 F'OV4 j r) C rAk'Aix$ GLY . b4'. -� e,H:�nnGNT SLE. X612, IVU SHEET 2 Of 2 SHEETS .0iloinCT NO. 9909 i PAW JAMES R. HILL, INC. 87037 Planners / Englneers / Surveyors Pa.9 No. 0100 Humboldt Avenue South FOLDER 81001nington, Mn. 55431 011-004-1015 /�F3 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS FOR YANKEE SQUARE OFFICE III PROJECT M. Refunding of City of Eagan $1,250,000 Commercial Development Revenue Bonds of 1982 (Yankee Square Office III Project) --The City has received a request from the Federal Land Company to authorize the Refunding of a Commercial Development Revenue Bond Issue that was approved in 1982 for the Yankee Square Office III Project. The Refunding would allow bonds to bear a lower interest rate which is an important economic consideration for Federal Land Company. In order for the public hearing to be held on the July 21 City Council date, the Director of Finance/City Clerk has published a notice in the appropriate newspapers. If the City Council decides not to allow the Refunding, those notices will be removed and the applicant will be liable for all costs. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of a letter from Briggs and Morgan ou lining the request for the Refunding. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny setting a public hearing for the July 21 City Council meeting to allow for a public hearing to consider the Refunding of $1,250,000 of Commercial Development Revenue Bonds of 1982 for Yankee Square Office III Project. /9� LAW OFFICES BRIGGS AND MORGAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE (612) 201-1215 TELECOPIER (612) 222-4071 INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF LEVITT, PALMER, BO'WEN, ROTMAN & SHARE June 30, 1987 VIA MESSENGER City of Eagan Eagan Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Attention: Thomas Hedges City Administrator RE: Refunding Commercial (Yankee Sq Dear Mr. Hedges: of City of Eagan -- $1,250,000 Development Revenue Bonds of 1982 uare Office III Prolect) In 1982 the City of Eagan issued its $1,250,000 Commercial Development Revenue Bonds of 1982 (Yankee Square Office III Project) (the "Bonds") in conjunction with the construction by Federal Land Company (the "Company") of a two-story commercial office building on real estate situated within the City. At the present time none of the Bonds have been retired. The Company has requested that the Bonds be refunded with bonds bearing a lower interest rate. You had asked what procedural steps must be taken by the City to effect a refunding. The City will be required by federal law to conduct a public hearing on the refunding proposal on July 21st. The public hearing must be preceded by published notice which complies with federal law requirements. We will arrange for publication in the Minneapolis Tribune of a Notice meeting those requirements. Additionally to comply with the policies of the City we will arrange for publication of the Notice on July 9th in the Dakota County Tribune. If the City decides on July 7th not to proceed to a public hearing, Notices of Cancellation of the hearing will be published. 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING 2400 IDS CENTER SAINT PAIIL, MINNESOTA 56301 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 36402 (012) 291-1215 (612) 339-0661 13RIGGS axn MORGAN City of Eagan June 30, 1987 Page Two If, after the public hearing is conducted on July 21st, the City determines to issue the refunding Bonds, the City will be required to execute the Bond documents which accomplish the refunding. We will be happy to attend the public hearing to answer any questions as well to attend the meeting on July 7th when we understand the matter will be discussed in a preliminary way. If in the interim you have any questions, please give me a call. Very truly yours, Michael H. Jeronimus MHJ:bjm-24 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 ADDITIONAL ITEMS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS A. Public Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Irrigation System Bids --Park Department Contract to Receive Bids/Award Contract for irrigation system materials at Northview Park/Goat Hill Park. Approved as a part of the 1984 park referendum was an irrigation system for Northview Park. At a recent City Council meeting there was a _recommendation by the Director of Parks and Recreation that due to a significant savings incurred by the City for the construction of Goat Hill Park, it was recommended that an irrigation system be approved for that park land similar to the system to be installed at Northview Park. A question was raised regarding the feasibility of purchasing a portable irrigation system instead of a permanent irrigation system for Goat Hill Park which will allow the City to utilize the equipment at other park land such as Rahn Park. The Director of Parks and Recreation was asked to address the issue and respond as a part of the consideration for approving bids for the irrigation equipment. Enclosed on pages through Le7Cj is a memo entitled irrigation quotes as pr pared by the Di e -motor of Parks and Recreation. Bids will be received on Monday, July 6 at 10:00 o'clock a.m. and tabulation will be provided with the Administrative Agenda on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the bid award for Northview Park/Goat Hill Park irrigation system materials. /1� 7 P - MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR +". FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: JUNE 22, 1987 BE: IRRIGATION The City Council and Councilmember Jim Smith had apparently requested a comparison or evaluation between a portable irrigation system and an underground irrigation system as is being bid for Goat Hill Park. For comparison purposes, I will compare the above ground irrigation as could be provided by "Rain Cannon," a product- manufactured by Larchmount Engineering and Irrigation Co. of Lexington, Maryland. This is similar to the one that I had proposed in 1983 for use at Rahn Park. This particular unit is trailer mounted with flexible hose. Additional hose lengths would be required, including a backflow preventer and booster pump in order to maintain the 70 P.S.I.'s required to properly operate this unit. Consequently, the estimated cost of this Rain Cannon, complete and ready for use, is between $7,000-$8,000. Once in place and turned on, the manufacturer claims the system can provide "one inch of water in three hours of time over an area of approximately one acre." Unfortunately, this one inch of water is not a uniform one inch. Because the irrigation head is a rotary unit from a single station, the uniformity of water on the outer circumference of the watering circle is correspondingly less than the inner areas of the watering circle. Consequently, where uniformity of irrigation is essential or a deep soaking is necessary, this unit has its obvious disadvantages. Its primary design and intended use is for the establishment of new turf, that is, for areas that have been recently seeded and require smaller units of watering but require them more frequently. This was its intended application in 1983 when I associated it with the development of Rahn Athletic Fields. Other obvious disadvantages of the Rain Cannon is that it has to be moved, set up, taken down, connected, etc. to be effective. For short time frames, when establishing grass it is worth the effort. However, once turf is established, this is obviously not the method that you wish to use for irrigation. Using Goat Hill Park as an example, the inground irrigation system will cost an estimated $10,000 for materials and supplies, plus any installation costs. Once installed and operational, there will be absolutely minimal staff operational time to set the irrigation system in operation. As you saw demonstrated last month, we will be using a computerized irrigation monitor to essentially turn on and off the system and will not require any manpower other than the initial computer programming time. The uniformity of the underground irrigation system is its primary advantage. Because of the multiple heads and overlapping of circular watering patterns - in a triangular setting, uniformity of water application ranges between 87-93% uniformity. This is extremely high. Second, because you have established turf, you are able to control volume of water application. Third, you can do an entire ball field in less time. For example, Goat Hill's major league baseball field would take ten hours to irrigate with the Rain Cannon system. Obviously, this would not even be a uniform watering application and if we were to achieve a one inch saturation over the entire park, we have estimated it would take closer to 14-16 hours of actual operation time. This would not /W include any time for connection, set up or relocation of the sprinkler head. Obviously, with time frames of 10-16 hours, you are extending over two or three day work period just to properly saturate one field. That is, it would take us at least three days to properly irrigate one field at one park. I'm trying not to be totally negative about the Rain Cannon. It certainly has its place and can be a very useful piece of equipment. The manufacturer continues to market and sell the unit as an "answer to irrigation", but in my estimation, its best use is for the establishment of new turf. In already established or maintained areas, it has very limited applications. Realistically, if we were to provide overland irrigation with this type of unit to a park such as Goat Hill, the City would really require two of these units. Second, relocating them to another park would almost be out of the question as their total irri^ation capacity would be consumed entirely at this one location. That is, by the time you have totally irrigated the park with two units, the area you started with would be ready for irrigation again. Consequently, the units would have to be rotated from one area of the park to another area, not really having time to be moved to another park. There are other systems that are also of an overground nature. This involves a system of piping and a series of sprinkler heads. This is a system I am familiar with as I used it in St. Louis Park for a number of years. This type of overland system is obviously more expensive than the Rain Cannon, but is much more effective. Again, its disadvantage is that it requires a significant amount of manpower to uncouple and relocate the pipe and sprinkler heads. Years ago, this system was actually cost effective even though it was labor intensive. However, as wage rates have increased and the cost for underground irrigation have actually "decreased" because of technological advances in piping and mass marketing, overground irrigation is no longer effective over a number of years. I do not have any recent information on this type of unit; I can only speak from experience of several years ago. I do know that St. Louis Park has since discarded this system in favor of the underground approach. If I can provide you with additional information or respond to specific questions, I would be happy to comply. KV/js 16 Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 Item 2. Contract 87-17, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Blackhawk Road - Street Reconstruction) --In response to the approved public hearing held for Project 488 on February 3, 1987, detail plans and specifications have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for formal approval and authorization to advertise for competitive bids. Individual and collective neighborhood meetings have been held with the affected property owners to review the final detail plans and the resulting -impacts. The consulting engineer will be available to discuss the details of this project and review the plans as necessary. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 87-17 (Blackhawk Road - Street Reconstruction) and order the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 1:30 p.m. on August 3, 1987. Item 3. Contract 87-26, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Wescott Road - Surfacing) --As a result of the approved public hearing held on April 21, 1987, the Council authorized the preparation of detail plans and specifications for the upgrading and surfacing of Wescott Road from Lexington Avenue to 1/2 mile east. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for authorization to advertise for competitive bids. Our consulting engineer will be available to review the details of these plans as necessary. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 87-26 (Wescott Road - Surfacing) and authorize advertisement for a bid opening to 'be held at 9:30 a.m., Friday, July 31, 1987. Item 4. Contract 87-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Wescott Road - Grading and Utilities) --On June 2, the Council approved the plans for the installation of utilities and related grading for the improvement of Wescott Road from Lexington Avenue to 1/2 mile east. Enclosed on page 'f�, - is a tabulation of the bids received at the formal bid opening held at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, July 2, 1987. Our consulting engineer will be evaluating all bids submitted for accuracy on additions and extensions and will be making a recommendation for formal consideration at the July 7 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 87-15 (Wescott Road - Grading and Utilities) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. WESCOTT ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY CONTRACT NO. 87-15 CITY PROJECT NO. 494 EAGAN MINNESOTA BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Thurs. July 2 1987 CONTRACTORS 1. Opus Corporation 2. Richard Knutson 3. Northdale Construction 4. Lake Area Utility 5. A. P. Keller 6. F. F. Jedlicki 7. S. M. Hentges 8. Minn -Kota 9. Arcon Construction 10. S. J. Louis Construction Low Bid Engineer's Estimate Feasibility Report (F.R.) % Over (+) /% Under (-) F.R. TOTAL BASE BID $ 454,775.50 $ 479,088.50 $ 481,042.75 $ 503,600.40 $ 529,930.00 $ 570,561.50 $ 576,645.52 $ 591,038.00 $ 598,773.09 $ 609,601.00 $454,775.50 $520,000.00 $509,445.00 -10.73% E Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 Item 5. Contract 87-15, Authorize Easement Acquisition (Parcel 10 -02300 -010 -01) --While the majority of the easements necessary to form the upgrading of Wescott Road under Contract 87-15 have been provided through the platting of adjacent properties, the above referenced parcel is an undeveloped piece of property under the jurisdiction of the Charles Govern Trust which required separate easement negotiation for acquisition. Enclosed on page -t-03 is a letter from the City Attorney's office relating the results of their negotiations. After review by the Public Works Department, it is mutually recommended that the Council approve the acquisition of the required easements for approximately $10,000. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the easement acquisition for Parcel 10-02300-010-01 under Contract 87-15 in the amount of $10,000 for 0.775 acres of public street right-of-way for Project 494 (Wescott Road). 7, HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. A11orrlrys at oGaw TOWN CENTRE PROFESSIONAL BLDG., SUITE 200 0q] 1260 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123 (612) 456-9000 June 24, 1987 Mr. Thomas Colbert Eagan Public Works Director 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN DEBRA E. SCHMIDT RE: Project #494, East Wescott Road - Streets and Utilities Charles Govern Trust Parcel No. 10-02300-010-01 Dear Mr. Colbert: I have been in contact with Mrs. June Hall in regard to the required easement acquisition for Wescott Road on the above-described parcel. I have been advised that Mrs. Hall is the trustee of the Charles Govern Trust which has experienced a significant amount of litigation by the various beneficiaries of the trust for several years. For this reason, the trust is under Court supervision, which has resulted in an appraisal of the property, which is to be sold. It is my understanding that the appraisal is in the area of $13,300.00 per acre. Because the property has been appraised and the trustee does not have the authority to negotiate a reduced settlement, we are suggesting that the City offer the trust approximately $10,000.00 for .775 acres of street right-of-way. It is my understanding that if the City is willing to move the fence, allowing the renter to continue to graze cattle, that the temporary easement will not have to be purchased. Please review my calculations in regard to the acreage and thus the amount to be tendered. If this is accepted by the City Council, it will be proposed to the trustee upon the threat of condemnation and with the understanding that such an -offer is not normally made, but due to these particular circumstances. Please set this matter .on for the next earliest City Council meeting. Sincerely yours, HAUGE,! CSR & KELLER, P.A. 12, D vid G. Keller DGK: ras ?jd cc: Thomas Hedges Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 Item 6. Contract 87-21, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Eagan Hill Farms - Trunk Utilities) --As a result of Council approval at the public hearing on April 21, detail plans and specifications for that portion of the trunk utilities to service the overall Eagan Hills Farms development concept have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their review, approval and authorization to -advertise for competitive bids. Our consulting engineer will be available to review the design details of these plans with the Council as necessary. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 87-21 (Eagan Hills Farms - Trunk Utilities) and order .the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 9:30 a.m., July 31, 1987. Item 7. Contract 87-22, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Hills of Stone Bridge — Trunk Utilities) --As a part of the overall Eagan Hills Farms development concept (Project 491) the trunk utilities serving this development have been broken down into three different areas. The previous agenda item addressed the trunk utilities to service the overall development concept. These plans provide for the extension of the trunk utilities to service the Hills of Stone Bridge Development adjacent to Dodd Road and south of Wescott Road. These plans have been completed in accordance with the Council action from the public hearing on April 21, 1987 and are now being presented for formal approval and authorization to advertise for competitive bids. Our consulting engineer will be available to review specific details of these plans as necessary. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 87-22 (Hills of Stone Bridge - Trunk Utilities) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 2:30 p.m. on July 31, 1987. Item 8. Contact 87-23, Approve Plans/Order Ad for Bids (Bridle Ridge - Trunk Utilities) --As a continuation of the trunk utilities within the Eagan Hills Farms overall concept development, this contract provides for the extension of these .trunks into the proposed Bridle Ridge Addition located south of Wescott Road along Elrene Road extended. These plans have been completed in accordance with the feasibility report approved by Council action on April 21, 1987 and are now being presented for formal Council approval and authorization to advertise for competitive bids. Our consulting engineer will be available to discuss design details as necessary regarding these plans. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 87-23 (Bridle Ridge - Trunk Utilities) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 1:30 p.m. on August 3, 1987. Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 REVIEW/APPROVE 1988 BUDGET GUN CLUB LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION B. Review/Approve 1988 Budget for Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization --In accordance with the Joint Powers Agreement that created the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization between the communities of Eagan, Inver Grove Heights and Mendota Heights, that organization is required to prepare their annual budget for presentation to the affected communities by July 1, to allow those communities 30 days to submit any objections before formal adoption by the WMO. Enclosed on page 01r,, is a copy of the proposed budget for 1988 with comparison to the 1986 and 1987 budgets. The estimated budget of $16,050 will be allocated to each community based on their proportionate share of their: 1. Total assessed valuation, and; 2. land area within the watershed district boundaries. Enclosed on page shows how the $16,050 are allocated between the two communit es with Eagan's share resulting in $14,366.30. When approved, this budget allocation will be included in the Engineering Division budget for 1988. The Council can either fund this out of the General Fund budget or through a special levy limitation as provided by state statute to finance our community's proportionate share. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further detail the proposed budget and answer any questions the Council may have prior to formal approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 1988 budget for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization. GUN CLUB LAKE WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION 1988 BUDGET APPROVED JUNE 1, 1987 CONSULTING ENGINEERING PLAN PREPARATION INSURANCE LEGAL AUDIT ADMIN. STAFF SERVICES PRINTING, SUPPLIES, POSTAGE CONFERENCES CONTINGENCY 1986 1987 1988 $ -- $ -- $7,500 25,000 10,000 -- 2,500 2,500 3,000 2,000 2,200 1,500 1,000 1,000 500 2,000 1,000 1,000 500 500 500 -- -- 550 3.000 1.700 1.500 $36,000 $18,900 $16,050 :. GUN CLUB LAKE WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION 6/16/87 1988 BILLING CALCULATIONS 1988 Budget Amount = Land Area Calculation in Gun Club Eagan 89.03% x Mendota Heights 6.54 x Inver Grove Heights 4.43 x ASSESSED VALUATION CALCULATION $16,050 1L2 Budget $8,025 = $7,144.65 8,025 = 524.84 8,025 - 355.51 $8,025.00 % Area in Total City o Valuation Gun Club Valuation(187)-in Gun Club Eagan 18,915 A x $304.OM = $256.2M 22,440 A Mendota Heights 1,390 A x $ 98.2M = 21.8M 6,263 A Inver Gr. Hts. 940 A x $140.OM = 6.7M 19,600 A TOTAL $284.7M ASSESSED VALUATION Valuation 1/2 Budget Eagan 256.2 x $8,025 284.7 Mendota Heights 21.8 x 8,025 284.7 Inver Gr. Hts. 6.7 x 8,025 284.7 TOTAL 1988 BILLS Area Valuation Eagan $7,144.65 + $7,221.65 Mendota Heights 524.84 + 614.49 Inver Gr. Hts. 355.51 + 188.86 Zo7 _ $7,221.65 io = 614.49 188.86 $8,025.00 1988 Bill $14,366.30 1,139.33 = 544.37 1 � ,...b.;,— Agenda Information Memo, July 7, 1987 ACCESSORY HOUSING CLARIFICATION C. Accessory Housing Clarification --The Planning Department has received the first Accessory Housing Application and is in need of an interpretation/clarification of the ordinance. Attached on '70through -71.-7—is a copy of a memo from the City Planner and the Accessory Housing Ordinance that was recently adopted by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide clarification for the implementation of the Accessory Housing Ordinance. MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JULY 1, 1987 SUBJECT: ACCESSORY HOUSING ORDINANCE The Planning Department has received an application for accessory housing in accordance to Ordinance No. 43. In review of this Ordinance, and applying this Ordinance to the housing permit, there is nothing in the Ordinance that requires the tenant to be a relative or relation except for the legal definition of family in the zoning ordinance. Staff would just like to draw this to your attention prior to reviewing any application with the Accessory Housing Ordinance. Enclosed is this ordinance for your review and would like to discuss this issue regarding the creation of duplex units in the single-family neighborhoods. City Planner DCR/mc/kf C' ORDINANCE NO. q, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE, C-HAPTER 11, ENTITLED "LAND USE REGULATIONS" BY ADDING PROVISIONS RELATING TO ACCESSORY APARTMENTS IN R-1 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE SECTION 11.99,_WHICH CONTAINS PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Eagan City Code, Chapter 11, is hereby amended by adding Section 11.20, Subd. 5.C.7 to read as follows: Section 11.20, Subd 5.C.7. Applications for conversion of existing, owner occupied, detached single family homes to two—family use may be allowed by the creation of an accessory apartment subject to review by the city. (a) Application shall be made on forms provided by the City which shall include the following: i. Legal description of the property location and proof of ownership. ii. Scale plans indicating existing and proposed floor plans and access to both the principal unit and the accessory unit. iii. Site plan depicting parking availability. (b) The City Planner shall review the completed application in consultation with the Building Inspector and Fire Chief, and shall determine whether the proposed conversion meets the following standards: C -7/d i. The accessory apartment shall be clearly a subordinate part of the single-family dwelling and in no case shall it be more than Forty (a0o) percent of the building's total floor area. ii. The accessory apartment shall consist of at least twenty (20%) percent of the principal building's total floor area. Living space square footage for the accessory apartment shall include a kitchen or cooking facilities, a bathroom and a living room . iii. No front entrances shall be added to the house as a result of the accessory apartment permit. iv. The house shall be owner -occupied. V. A minimum of three off-street parking spaces shall be pr ov id ed . vi. The accessory apartment and principal unit shall meet the applicable standards and requirements of the Eagan City Code, Building Code and Fire Code. vii. The building and property shall remain in single ownership and title and shall have only one mailingaddress. viii. Only one accessory apartment permit may be issued for each detached single family home. (c) The City Planner shall deny or approve the application based upon a statement of findings relative to the above standards. If the decision is to accept, a notice of intent shall be sent to all neighboring owners within 150 feet of the perimeter of the property. Written camments will be requested within 10 days, reviewed, and a V 2 final decision made by the City Planner. The applicant or other aggrieved party may appeal the decision within 10 days to the City Council which shall make the final determination. Failure to give mailed notice or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings provided a bona fide attempt has been made to contact the neighboring owners. (d) The City has the right to attach conditions when approving an accessory apartment permit. The City shall require the owner to place restrictive covenants to be recorded with the property controlling the accessory apartment. Such covenants shall be approved by the City Attorney. (e) Upon the sale of a home having an accessory apartment permit, the buyer shall submit a new application for renewal of the permit. (f) An accessory apartment permit shall terminate if the above referenced standards are not adhered to. (g) The City Councicl may revoke an accessory apartment permit if the criteria and conditions under which the permit was granted are violated. M Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 11.99 entitled "Violation A Misdemeanor" is hereby adopted in its entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein. Y/V 3 Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST:CITY OF EAGAN r� CITY COUNCIL C",Oi 1}Ej�_ By:1`,� 271Q � �Cj`f1QCciS Its Clerk Its Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted:'`E`�C.S Date Ordinance Published in the legal newspaper: +'-�zN 3 7/3