Loading...
1984-04 Eagan News Special IssueEAGAN NEWS CITY OF EAGAN 1 3830 Pilot Knob RoadApril 1984 Eagan, MN 55122 L Vol. 7 No. 1 Phone: 454-8100 [[ I FFRI, v J THE LONE OAK TREE_THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY CITY COUNCIL SETS PARKS BOND REFERENDUM A special election for a parks bond refer- endum has been set for May 22 by the Eagan City Council. This action was taken by the Council after much input from residents and many public meet- ings and hearings. On March 22, after reviewing the specific recommenda- tions of the Advisory Parks and Recrea- tion Commission and of a special Citizens Task Force, the Council set the bond referendum amount and date. In recommending the two part bond ref- erendum, the Task Force and Commis- sion's report stated that Eagan parks are "inadequate". The Task Force cited the continuing growth of the community and overcrowding of existing park facilities, the need to provide play facilities for the City's youth, and that development of City parks is long overdue. Part I of the two part bond referendum question would provide basic develop- ment for neighborhood and community parks to meet 1984/1985 need levels. Part 11 of the referendum question would provide additional funding to secure and meet future park needs. Additional in- formation regarding the bond referen- dum is contained in this special news- letter edition. Every Eagan resident is urged to study the park bond referendum proposal and to vote on May 22. Voting precincts and locations remain the same as in the last election. If you have questions regarding where to vote or how to register, call the Eagan Municipal Center at 454-8100. INSIDE Referendum Planning Process .... 2 Sample Ballot ... ..... .......... . 3 Cost to the Taxpayer . . .3 What You Should Know... ........ 4 Park Map ....... ....... 5 Questions and Answers ....... . . 6 This special issue of the Eagan City Newsletter is authorized bythe Eagan City Council and prepared through the office of the City Administrator in order to supply residents of Eagan with information regarding the up- coming park bond referendum. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS TO BE HELD The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is hosting a series of public informational meetings regard- ing the proposed bond issue. These meetings will be held at the Eagan Municipal Center, 3830 Pilot Knob Road. Saturday, May 5, 1:30 p.m. Wednesday, May 9, 7:30 p.m. Thursday, May 10, 7:30 p.m. If you have any questions or if an organization or group would like in- formation about the proposed parks bond referendum, please attend an informational meeting or contact the Eagan Parks and Recreation Depart- ment at the Municipal Center - 454- 8100. YESTERDAY, TODAY AND TOMORROW Yesterday: The Eagan Park System began years ago when Eagan was still just a township. In 1971 a successful referendum made it possible to acquire and develop several park sites. With the adoption by the City Council of a dedica- tion ordinance in 1974, the City required residential developers to provide land for future development as a park. Today: The park system has grown to 33 park sites. Unfortunately the majority of these sites remain undeveloped. With the growth of the community, the demand for park facilities has grown dramatically overthe past several years. A decision on how to meet today's needs and the future of the parks system is now being con- sidered. Parks are an important part of a well- planned city. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission urdertook an extensive study of the park .system. The study included many neighborhood meet- ings and public hearings. Serious short- comings in providing developed parks as well as athletic facilities were pointed out. Tomorrow: The proposed parks bond referendum will provide funding to de- velop neighborhood and community park facilities which cannot be completed by any other means. Development of exist- ing sites for neighborhood use, athletic groups and family usage was deter- mined to be important by the systems plan study. Eagan now has the op- portunity to develop a park system for present and future usage by the resi- dents of Eagan. EAGAN'S PARK DEVELOPMENT IS BEHIND THE NATIONAL AVERAGE Year Developed Acres / Population Eagan 1979 .. i 123 / 19,900 Eagan ■ Y 1984 ( Projected 123 / 30,000 VOTE TUESDAY MAY 22 BOND REFERENDE.,0.," RESULT OF LONG PLANNING PROCESS The May 22 bond referendum is a result of more than two years of intensive study and planning. The process started many months ago as a result of citizens' requests to the City for more and better park services. Members of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, who are volunteer citizens appointed by the City Council, began the formal study process in April of 1982. A professional parks planning firm, Erkkila & Associates, was hired to assist the City in the planning effort for better parks. One of the first tasks to be completed was a detailed inventory and analysis of existing park land and facilities. The consultant reported that the City was seriously short of developed parks and concluded that the City had only about one-half of the developed parks necessary fora city with the population the size of Eagan. He found that in comparison to neighboring communities, Eagan was far behind in providing all types of parks and play facilities. A community survey of City residents was taken and a series of public meetings was held to gain additional citizen input. Following these public meetings, the Commission spent many hours with the parks consultant analyzing City needs in relation to the inventory of existing parks and facilities. Also studied were analyses relating to demographic information, population concentration and parks' needs. These needs included basic athletic facilities, play equipment, skating opportunities, trails, etc. Majorfacilities such as an indoor ice arena and a community swimming pool were also studied thoroughly. As part of the planning process, the necessity of balancing the distribution of facilities was studied. A second series of neighborhood meetings was then held to obtain additional citizen comment on the findings and initial conclusions of the study. The Advisory Commission then began prioritizing the park system's various needs. The emphasis was placed on the development of neighborhood parks which are the backbone of any park system. Acquisition of additional parks for future population and construction of major facilities such as an indoor ice rink or swimming pool were recognized as important issues as were other specialized park needs. However, these more complex and expensive needs were seen as being subordinate to the importance of developing existing park land and community parks in order to provide the basics of a city wide park system. At the request of the Advisory Commission, the City Council established a Citizens Task Force to review the park needs study and the necessity of a parks bond referendum. After detailed study, the Task Force concluded that the development of the present Eagan park system is long overdue. They concurred with the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission recommendation that a parks bond referendum be held to finance the development of the needed parks. -2- r-. National Average Source: Rational Park �. .} .�.. and R r_reation Assoc t:.rion 125 / 12,500 Eagan 1979 .. i 123 / 19,900 Eagan ■ Y 1984 ( Projected 123 / 30,000 VOTE TUESDAY MAY 22 BOND REFERENDE.,0.," RESULT OF LONG PLANNING PROCESS The May 22 bond referendum is a result of more than two years of intensive study and planning. The process started many months ago as a result of citizens' requests to the City for more and better park services. Members of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, who are volunteer citizens appointed by the City Council, began the formal study process in April of 1982. A professional parks planning firm, Erkkila & Associates, was hired to assist the City in the planning effort for better parks. One of the first tasks to be completed was a detailed inventory and analysis of existing park land and facilities. The consultant reported that the City was seriously short of developed parks and concluded that the City had only about one-half of the developed parks necessary fora city with the population the size of Eagan. He found that in comparison to neighboring communities, Eagan was far behind in providing all types of parks and play facilities. A community survey of City residents was taken and a series of public meetings was held to gain additional citizen input. Following these public meetings, the Commission spent many hours with the parks consultant analyzing City needs in relation to the inventory of existing parks and facilities. Also studied were analyses relating to demographic information, population concentration and parks' needs. These needs included basic athletic facilities, play equipment, skating opportunities, trails, etc. Majorfacilities such as an indoor ice arena and a community swimming pool were also studied thoroughly. As part of the planning process, the necessity of balancing the distribution of facilities was studied. A second series of neighborhood meetings was then held to obtain additional citizen comment on the findings and initial conclusions of the study. The Advisory Commission then began prioritizing the park system's various needs. The emphasis was placed on the development of neighborhood parks which are the backbone of any park system. Acquisition of additional parks for future population and construction of major facilities such as an indoor ice rink or swimming pool were recognized as important issues as were other specialized park needs. However, these more complex and expensive needs were seen as being subordinate to the importance of developing existing park land and community parks in order to provide the basics of a city wide park system. At the request of the Advisory Commission, the City Council established a Citizens Task Force to review the park needs study and the necessity of a parks bond referendum. After detailed study, the Task Force concluded that the development of the present Eagan park system is long overdue. They concurred with the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission recommendation that a parks bond referendum be held to finance the development of the needed parks. -2- WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED IN QUESTION I? Neighborhood parks form the heart of the City parks system, providing residen- tial neighborhoods with nearby access to recreational opportunities. Lands al- ready acquired from developers are pro- posed to be constructed as neighborhood parks. Included will be landscaping, park trails, playground equipment, play fields and basketball courts. Brief summaries of the proposed development for each park include: 1. Blue Cross/Blue Shield - ball fields, tennis, soccer, play equip- ment, parking, skating, hockey and warming house. 2. Meadowland - ball fields, soccer, play equipment. 3. Coachman - ball fields, soccer, play equipment, parking, skating, hockey and warming house. 4. Pilot Knob - skating, hockey, play equipment, trails, shelter. 5. DeBoer - a play field, trails, picnic areas, lake observation and play equipment. 6. Fish Lake- picnicarea, trails, canoe access and parking. 7. Wedgewood - ball fields, soccer, tennis, parking and play equipment. Lone oak Road '� i 13 rn Hwy 55 I E� Hwy 1 t i� Yankee Doodle Roaa , 1, s° I c' fl/ onnaY Road ® 0 ;o. jZ/ C� Wl/tla"'-a Run r �✓ ARad,.,, EAGAN PARK LOCATIONS 8. Ridgecliff-tennis, soccer, ball field, 17. Lakeside - development of play 26. skating, hockey and shelter. field area. Several existing park sites are in need of improvements or completion. These parks will receive new play equipment in addition to what is being proposed: 9. Carnelian - improved ball field and shelter, new all purpose court. 10. Woodhaven - lighted tennis courts, improved ball field, parking and trail. 11. Evergreen -improved tennis courts and ball field. 12. Highview - improved tennis courts and improved ball field/soccer area. 13. Country Home - improved tennis court facilities and ball field area. 18. Bur Oaks Park, 19. Oak Chase Park, 20. Walden Heights, 21. Peridot Path, 22. River Hills, and 23. Cinnamon Ridge park areas will also be included in the bond referendum to receive new play equipment and improvements to landscaping. Community facilities forthe development of athletic and other recreational activi- ties are a logical extension of the neigh- borhood parks. Funding for the develop- ment of these community park areas is proposed under the parks bond refer- endum as follows: 14. Lexington -improved ball field and 24 tennis facility. 15. Carlson Lake - improved turf trails 25 and lake observation. 16. South Oaks - enlarged play field/ soccer and lake access. Rahn Park - three softball fields, a baseball field, an improved soccer field and additional equipment. Capricorn Park - will include a major and minor league baseball field, two hockey rinks, a skating area, parking and shelter building. -5- 27. Northview Park - irrigation and lighting to four existing softball fields and shelter building. Schwanz Lake Community Park - include play field area, lake access, a picnic pavilion, six picnic shelters, trailways, horseshoe courts and parking. (Note: The above represents a brief out- line of facilities included for each park area. It is proposed that landscaping and park benches be included.) Trails: The bond referendum also in- cludes funding for construction of addi- tional trails which are to be a part of the. City-wide system. Priority areas, which provide access to community facilities, are anticipated to be constructed. QUESTION 11 Question II has been carefully planned to provide for further development of neighborhood parks. Acquisition of land suitable forafuture athleticfield complex is included. THE PARKS BOND QUESTION This special election is asking two ques- tions of Eagan residents. In Question 1, the voters will be asked whether or not they want to authorize the sale of $3,316,000 in general obligation bonds to develop City parks to meet today's needs for neighborhood and com- munity facilities. In Question 11, the voters will be asked whether or not they will authorize an additional amount of $1,096,000 in bond funds to develop additional parks and additional facilities to meet today's and future needs. If Question I does not pass, the results for Question II will be invalid. Below is a sample ballot for your review: SAMPLE BALLOT Q 1. Shall the City of Eagan issue general obligation bonds in an amount notto exceed $3,316,000 for development of neighborhood and community parks? Q. I I.If the above proposal is adopted, shall the City of Eagan issue ad- ditional obligation bonds in the amount of $1,096,000 for ac- quisition and development of parks? Note: Question If cannot pass unless Question I is approved. COST TO THE TAXPAYER Part i of the requested parks bond referendum is for $3,316,000. Part 11 of the bond referendum which will provide for future park acquisition and development is for $1,096,000. Taxwise, Eagan's business community will contribute approximately 410 of the total cost of the parks bond with residents contributing the remainder. As Eagan grows in population and assessed valuation, the individual property owner's cost for this bond issue will decrease. The estimated cost per household is listed below: Question I Question II Property Tax Per Per Per Per Now Month Year Month Year $ 600 $1.50 $18.00 $.55 $6.60 800 1.75 21.00 .65 780 1,000 2.00 2400 .70 8.40 1,200 2.25 27.00 75 8.85 1,400 2.50 30.00 .80 980 Information on cost estimates provid- ed by the City of Eagan's fiscal con- sultant, Miller& Schroeder Municipals, I nc. YOUR TAX DOLLAR Other 3.80 City:-.` Schools : :15.50 58.70 Parks & Recreation 1.90 County ::: 20.10 This diagram shows how your property taxes are spent. The City receives 17.40 of each property tax dollar, only 1.90 of which is spent on parks and recreation. mac; THE PARKS BOND REFERENDUM PROPOSAL INCLUDES Part I For Our Community: The proposed parks bond includes the construction of new neighborhood parks and improvements to many existing parks. Development of community facilities which provide for passive recreation such as picnicing and hiking, as well as active sports like baseball, soccer, tennis and hockey are also included. The parks bond referendum will provide adequate park facilities for Eagan's present needs. For Our Children: The referendum will provide play equip- ment for eleven (1 1) new park areas and improved equipment for eleven (1 1) other parks. Five (5) skating rinks and hockey facilities are planned. Basketball courts, winter sliding hills and open play areas will also be prepared. For Adults: Parks will offer walking trails, jogging trails, benches and picnic facilities. Six (6) additional tennis courts (two with lights) are planned. Athletic facilities are also proposed for Eagan's growing adult team sports. For Families: Many unique neighborhood parks are proposed in the bond referendum. Some of these parks will provide for park shel- ters and all will have playground equip- ment nearby for children. A community picnic park will provide for open picnic shelters, tables and grills along with op- portunities for volleyball, horseshoes and field game areas. A canoe access will allow for trips around a lake. For Team Sports: Facilities for Eagan's outdoorteam sports are proposed to include lighting for four existing softball fields. Younger athletes will play on three (3) new baseball fields, several new soccer fields, softball fields and hockey rinks. Part II Part It will provide similar improvements as above with the addition of land ac- quisition for athletic needs as well as additional neighborhood park develop- ment. WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW 1. The City of Eagan has experienced tremendous increases in housing and population. In 1980, the federal census showed a population of 20,720. In 1984, the population is expected to exceed 30,000 people. The construction of parks and playgrounds has not kept pace with this population growth. 2. In 1982, the City had approximately one-half of the developed park space required forthe existing population based on recognized national standard indexes. The Citizens Task Force suggested that the standards were too conservative and that the deficiency in park facilities may actually be greaten In comparison to our neighboring communities, the City of Eagan is providing only one-third of what those cities have developed for their populations. 3. Many of the City's youth teams - hockey, soccer, and baseball - must now travel to other communities in order to find sufficient practice and game field space. These youth associations expect continued growth in their numbers of participants and projects that they will require additional facilities to meet their needs. 4. The last park development project (Northview) was initiated in 1978! This project was financed by federal and state park grants. In 1983, $80,000 in grant money was awarded for the partial development of Rahn Park Because of federal and state grant program cuts, future opportunities for park grants will be severely limited or non-existent. 5. The State Legislature has placed a limit on the amount of money that can be raised through City property taxes each year. Based on the need for essential City services, parks capital improvements money cannot be financed by the City budget. A bond issue is necessary. 6. The City has recently completed a 2 -year study of the park system. The findings are: a. There are undeveloped neighborhood parks in many residential areas which have existed for a number of years. Development of neighbor- hood parks as a backbone of the park system is essential. b. Many existing neighborhood parks are inadequate to serve neighbor- hood residents; particularly lacking is playground equipment. c. Athletic facilities are too few and often "Substandard" to meet the needs of the youth and adults. Serious shortcomings exist in every type of facility - soccer, ballfields, tennis courts, skating, hockey, etc. d. A community picnic area or "central park facility" is non-existent and should receive high priority. e. Continued development and completion of a trail system should have priority to provide for safe access to parks, commerce, libraries and other community facilities. -4- VOTE TUESDAY MAY 22 ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Roger Martin, Chairperson Carolyn Thurston, Vice -Chairperson Richard Carroll, Secretary COMMISSION MEMBERS Joanne Alt Sandy Bertz William Jackson Tom Ketcham George Kubik Sandy Masin Douglas McNeely CITIZEN TASK FORCE Joanne Alt John Ayotte Norm Berg Raymond Bohn Joe Bozicevich Kay Carney Judy Forrde Les Hanson Bill Jackson Glen James Sue Kirk Carolyn Kompelien Dave Kompelien Marilyn Lancette Tony Lancette Scott Nelson Dick Pettit Gary Pietig Dick Starr Roger Swenson Carolyn Thurston Paul Uselmann Lois Van Dyck Jim Williams QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS Q. Why do we need to build parks Q now? A. Y A. Q. A. Q. A. Many residents have realized that the existing development of parks does not meet the needs of the community. The last park develop- ment by the City (Northview) was completed in 1979, financed by a grant from the Federal and State governments. Since 1979, the City population has increased by nearly one-half. And building parks today will cost less than it will in the future. How much of the proposed parks bond fund will be used for acqui- sition of land? None in Part I. The entire amount will be used for development of new parks for which the City al- ready owns the land and improve- ment to existing parks. In Part 11, some of the bond money would be used for acquisition of land. Why do we need to bond for parks development? Bonding is the only way sufficient money can be made available to develop parks. How deficient is the Eagan park system? The Eagan park system has about one-half of the national standard for "developed park acreage" and about one-third of the developed park land of surrounding commun- ities. A recent study indicated that there is a serious deficiency in vir- tually every type of park amenity normally found within a park sys- tem -- playground equipment, ball fields, tennis courts, picnic areas and other park features. How far will the bond money go toward meeting the deficiencies you've mentioned? A. That is difficult to quantify, but based on current population, all of the money in the Phase I bond issue will be used to meet current needs. Part II of the bond referendum will meet some of the future needs of the City as it grows. Q. Which neighborhood parks will be affected? A. Under the bond proposal nearly all parks will receive play equipment, seven new neighborhood parks will be constructed and other existing parks will receive improvements or complete development. Q. What about community parks? A. A community picnic/leisure park is proposed to be developed. Im- provements to Northview Athletic Fields are proposed and develop- ment of team sports facilities at Rahn Park and Capricorn Park is also included. Q. What happens if the bond issue does not pass? A. The parks will not be built. Q. I know we need parks, but what do I get out of it? A. If the proposed bond issue passes, the City will be able to develop a wide variety of facilities for diverse recreational needs. Playground equipment, athletic fields, skating rinks, tennis courts, jogging and fitness trails, as well as a commun- ity picnic area will be provided. MORE QUESTIONS? Q. Why are there two parts to the bond issue? A. The study that was recently com- pleted and reviewed by the Com- mission and Citizens Task Force identified the past and present needs of the park system. Part I of the issue will allow the park system to "catch up" to today's needs. Part II of the issue begins to address the needs of future community growth. Q. If I vote "yes" on Part 11, does that mean that I approve of Part 1? A. "No!" Residents should vote on both parts. Approval of Part 11 does not approve Part I. Part 11 cannot be authorized unless Part I is first approved and Part II is also ap- proved. Q. What is included in the bond amounts? A. All costs associated with the build- ing of the parks such as planning, engineering, equipment and grad- ing are included. In fact, grading costs alone amount to approxi- mately 27% of the total amount for building the parks. Q. Assuming the park bond issue passes, when will construction begin on the parks? A. Construction will begin on detailed plans and specifications immedi- ately. Some construction can be expected to begin this year while other work will be phased in over a period of time to insure that every economy of construction can be taken. Come to an informational meeting at the EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER: Saturday, May 5, 1:30 p.m. Wednesday, May 9,7:30 p.m. Thursday, May 10, 7:30 p.m. or call the Eagan Parks & Recreation Department at 454-8100.