Loading...
2995 Lone Oak Cir - 1995 Interstate Crossing • BRAUN' RAUNsM Braun Intertec Corporation 6950 West 146th Street,Suite 131 Apple Valley,Minnesota 55124-8520 I N I E R I E C 612-431-4493 Fax:431-3084 "` Engineers and Scientists Serving the Built and Natural Environments November 20, 1995 Project BODX-95-200C Egan Job No. 95-A Mr. John Allen Industrial Equity 1660 South Highway 100, Suite 5306W Minneapolis, MN 55416 Dear Mr. Allen: Re: Structural Steel Nondestructive Examination Services, Industrial Equity Buildings 1 and 2, Eagan, Minnesota Nondestructive examination services were performed on this project as authorized. These services were conducted from August 28 through November 16, 1995, on an on-call basis. These observations were performed by Joel Alsum, a level II technician qualified in accordance with American Society for Nondestructive Testing (ASNT)publication SNT-TC-1A, 1988 Edition, as an American Welding Society Certified Welding Inspector, and as an International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) certified special inspector for structural steel and welding. Scope of Services During this time period, the following observations were performed. • Visual examinations of field welds • Bolting observations • Deck weld observations Results A summary of the results for our services is described below. Copies of our Daily Observation Reports were left at the project after completion of each site visit. All observations performed were found acceptable as indicated below. For specific information, please refer to the attached Daily Observation Reports. Visual Weld Examinations. Visual weld examinations were conducted in accordance with American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1-1994, Sections 3.6 and 8.15 requirements. These observations were performed at the following locations. Location Level Description Remarks Building 1 Grids A to F Roof Bar joist to beam or angle fillet Acceptable Lines 1 to 5 welds • Industrial Equity Project BODX-95-200C November 20, 1995 Page 2 Location Level Description Remarks Building 1 Grids A to D Roof Bar joist to beam or angle fillet Acceptable Lines 5 to 8 welds Grids A to D Roof Bar joist to beam or angle fillet Acceptable Lines 13 to 17 welds Grid A Roof Bar joist to beam or angle fillet Acceptable Lines 8 to 13 welds Grid B to D Roof Bar joist to beam or angle fillet Acceptable Lines 8 to 13 welds Grids A to D Roof Bar joist to beam or angle fillet Acceptable Lies 8 to 13 welds Building 2 Grids A to E Roof Bar joist to beam fillet welds Acceptable Lines 1 to 3 Grids B to E Roof Bar joist to beam fillet welds Acceptable Lines 3 to 6 Bolting Observations. Bolting observations were conducted to determine the bolt torque of the hexhead bolts to be fastened in accordance with AISC specifications for A-325 and A-490 bolts. Listed below are the locations in which bolting observations were performed. Location Level Description Remarks Building 1 Grids B to D Roof A325 3/4-inch tension control Acceptable Lines 2 to 8 bolts Grids B to D Roof A325 3/4-inch tension control Acceptable Lines 12 to 16 bolts Grids B to D Roof A325 3/4-inch tension control Acceptable Lines 8 to 12 bolts Building 2 Grids B to D Roof A325 3/4-inch tension control Acceptable Lines 1 to 6 bolts Deck Weld Observations. Deck weld observations were conducted in accordance with AWS D1.3-1989, Section 4.5 requirements. Listed below are the results of these observations. • Industrial Equity Project BODX-95-200C November 20, 1995 Page 3 Location Level Description Remarks Building 1 Grids A to E Roof Roof deck welds and tek screws Acceptable Lines 1 to 4 Grids A to D Roof Roof deck welds and tek screws Acceptable Lines 4 to 8 Building 2 Grids A to E Roof Roof deck welds and tek screws Acceptable Lines 1 to 4 Grids A to D Roof Roof deck welds and tek screws Acceptable Lines 4 to 8 It is our opinion that at the time of our last observation there were no outstanding discrepancies remaining on this project at the areas listed. General Services performed by the Braun Intertec technicians for this project have been conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time restraints. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This test report contains only findings and results arrived at after employing the specific test procedures and standards listed herein. It is not intended to constitute a recommendation, endorsement, or certification of the product or material tests. It has been a pleasure to be of service to you on this project. If you have questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance,please call Joel Alsum at(612) 942-4919 or Mary Denne at (612) 942-4823. Sin rely Joel Alsu Level 0 E Te r ician c 4 0/1(714 arvin C. Denne Manager—NDE Services Attachments: Daily Observation Sheets c: Mr. Jeff Wellman; Rochon Corporation Mr. Joe Voels; City of Eagan ja\med:mjs\bodx\rpt\95200c B R A V N. Special Inspector Daily Report Page 1 of / NTE RTEC City of E��rir Report Number: F Date of This Report: P —(7 9 Project Name: „j'„c �r,,5- Project No.: i3l/,(y 5` Zvc' C Project Address: Client: `� 1 .,., �� n Client Project No.: Weather: t Temperature: Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous ❑ Masonry ❑ Rebar Placement 0 Foundations ® Periodic ❑ Welding 0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing ❑ Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0 Description and location of work completed ( I' 4 /), es Ale } ;'/ x .L/; t er•-‘,(C-(> nfr,,,,./s- ,e x6. 13 z Cr:Y(5 b F 7 /-7 �C/F l (1 (e- iry / List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0 No • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 No 0 • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except_ �noted above. � �l Date: f — �`' `" ry Si,ned: Od�•t ;j VSs �--re-:--- v ; Print Full Name: .+ ,r,,>s : — / I.D. Number: t b 7 1 (White copy to Braun /ntertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Innlspc.insp.4 1/25/95 B R A U N S~ Special Inspector Daily Report Page / of ( INTERTEC City of ,. Report Number: Date of This Report: 5?-- Project =Project Name: Coss�-,ry Project No.: 50/,2x92_ Za 'C Project Address: / Client: (7),r Client Project No.: Inspection Type(s)/Coverage: Continuous❑ Periodic El Time Beginning Inspection: Time Ending Inspection: Weather and Temperature: q'ge1C Describe Inspections Made, Including Locations 6 'J) #11,p, /,-„s 2 Aoff "y2,- - 3ls ® - t C � /�o, � /�e f%`a `. `' ., � ,.• � �.. '� Geigy _S -/tee e Y-44 (1 r.VS /1 , li%f GS ri-o 8 /3 0•i f 74`l fCl�'GIG�S /4icc apicr16(, List Tests Made: (/�y ci-,y(/:../e(d m t a)%`vsi l ayrZ List Items Requiring Correction. (See attached summary sheet for previously listed items): //a YF e List Changes Authorized by Architect or Engineer to the City-Approved Plans: /0277 e Comments: O 14%ci-, 1.SJR S��P.Y¢J To the best of our knowledge. work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable wo kmans '• p .visions of the UBC. except as noted above. Signed: /� �— Date: 4" 2-Fir Print I Name: he. 0(t/'4 I.D. Number: (2F2 (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) frmspecinsp.5 1/25/95 B RAU N" Special Inspector Daily Report Page ( of N T E RT E C City of Eq7t-ki � Report Number: 772x Date of This Report: g'-3e-9 s Project Name: :4;4,,/-S/L,,? new-S5-, Project No.: gaDX SIS 2OOC Project Address: Client: A',4„07 (a, 4 Client Project No.: Inspection Type(s)/Coverage: Continuous❑ Periodic,I1 Time Beginning Inspection: Time Ending Inspection: G Weather and Temperature: 7< r Describe Inspections Made, Including Locations: GY`i I jr 13X-00 L,' /2.4/i/132- 5' j�,a Si'vH �P,-►�r�/f�e/fs -Aro Y /PG�? s A/-0 15 )4,/7 spa /ve/c�S Gi�.r�/2 �.,c�/ty`,-A426/7e 1- ‘)/3 //g%10-,`5J` X✓ Ast,ple List Tests Made: //'.`so-plw.tl..,. ( ha/><�'- List Items Requiring Correction. (See attached summary sheet for previously listed items): /r2f*. List Changes Authorized by Architect or Engineer to the City-Approved Plans: if/o4 a Comments: To the best of our knowledge work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workman ip p ,vi ' s of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: VRPiI % Date: `/30-9 Print Full Na e: I.D. Number: /`! 7g.7 f (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) frm\sp ec insp.5 1/25/95 B R A U Ns' Special Inspector Daily Report Page ( of NTE BTEC City of ���,�N Report Number: �t/`Pe Date of This Report: 9-/-q - Project Name: Z'14fer Project No.: 1360yg5 2006 Project Address: Client: C,,.,,Q (oma Client Project No.: � Inspection Type(s)/Coverage: Continuous 0 Periodic Time Beginning Inspection: Time Ending Inspection: Weather and Temperature: 5°F Describe Inspections Made, Including Locations 6 ,d5/yt7 � e�5 g!,/2. l 9-2 s 1a-a-r c,„1(,,,7g,/,4f /,.A.,.‘4, (Aa., p {Yo D//41.97P �a// K eve/L ACCeO)(6-6(e a Jr--7c6.5 /4/-0 E 47 Q$ /4,4,0 / ,/ma c /Q o S.de ler 94"0 w3. ?dS �v; ��GJ�rG �'7 List Tests Made: List Items Requiring Correction. (See attached summary sheet for previously listed items): List Changes Authorized by Architect or Engineer to the City-Approved Plans: Po'v► Comments: To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable wor mansi.p pr visions of the UBC, except as noted above. / Date: Signed: . - Print " ull Name: d�,gr.(Ir lri�t I.D. Number: (- -‘ 7,( (White copy to Braun Interrec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) trm\sQccinsPs 1r25l95 1 , . BRAUN" Special Inspector Daily Report Page ( of I INTERTEC City of � Report Number: Fw Date of This Report: 9-2) -y 5 Project Name: ZKfv-54•Ie C,6-ss..t, Project No.: g00x 95, Lao Project Address: , Client: 4 p.i ear Client Project No.: Inspection Type(s)/Coverage: Continuous 0 Periodic ,Z Time Beginning Inspection: Time Ending Inspection: v Weather and Temperature: 6.c. L �.Cs /./- J/-, .4 F _at-46. /z p Describe Inspections Made, Including Locations: �. of- List Tests Made: 1,at- D€c kcaeW. , e c1<<rt^ List Items Requiring Correction. (See attached summary sheet for previously listed items): tion! P List Changes Authorized by Architect or Engineer to the City-Approved Plans: //o /e Comments: Tu the best of our knowl/ ge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmansh' ro 'sions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: c Date: ,' 2."--- Print "Print Full Name: 41 / - LD. Number: r /f7(c" (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) frm\specinsp.5 1/25/95 • • CONTRACTOR'S MATERIAL & TEST CERTIFICATE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS -WATER SPRAY SYSTEMS PART "A" GENERAL PROCEDURE UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, INSPECTION AND TESTS SHOULD BE MADE BY CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE AND WITNESSED BY AN OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. ALL.DEFECTS SHOULD BE CORRECTED AND SYSTEM LEFT IN SERVICE BEFORE CONTRACTOR'S MEN FINALLY LEAVE THE JOB. A CERTIFICATE SHOULD BE FILLED OUT AND SIGNED BY BOTH REPRESENTATIVES. COPIES SHOULD BE PREPARED FOR INSPECTING AUTHORITIES, OWNER AND CONTRACTOR. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE IN NO WAY PREJUDICES ANY CLAIM AGAINST CONTRACTOR FOR FAULTY MATERIAL, POOR WORKMANSHIP OR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH INSPECTING AUTHORITY'S REQUIREMENTS OR LOCAL ORDINANCES. PROPERTYNAME _ DATE PROPERTY ADDRESS lY o ACCEPTE BY INSPECTION AUTHORITY 'S NAMES • ADDRESS -- PLANS INSTALLATION CONFORMS TO ACCEPTED PLANS Y ! NO 0 EQUIPMENT USED IS APPROVED Y' • HO 0 IF NO, STATE DEVIATIONS HAS PERSON IN CHARGE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT BEEN INSTRUCTED AS TO LOCATION OF CONTROL VALVES AND CARE OF THIS NEW EQUIPMENT Yiti"C7.. NO ❑ INSTRUC- • IF NO, EXPLAIN ' TIONS HAS A COPY OF INSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE CHART BEEN LEFT YES NO ❑ AT PLANT J" IF NO, EXPLAIN • FLUSHING: Flow the required rate until pains are clear as indicated by no collection of foreign material in burlap bags at outlets such as hydrants and blow-offs. Flush at flows not less than 750 GPM for 8-inch pipe and smaller, 10011 GPM for 8-inch. 1500 GPM for 10-inch. 2000 GPM for 12-inch. Where supply TEST cannot produce stipulated flow rate, obtain maximum available by using properly sized discharge devices. HYDROSTATIC: Hydrostatic test should be made at not lees than 200 PSI for two hours or 50 PSI above static pressure in excess of 150 PSI. Differential dry-pipe valve clappers should be left open during test to prevent damage. All above ground piping leakage should be stopped. DESCRIP- LEAKAGE: New pipe laid with rubber gasketed joints should, if the workmanship is satisfactory, have no leakage at the joints. Unsatisfactory amounts of leakage usually result from twisted, pinched or cut gaskets. However, some leakage might result from small amounts of grit or small imperfections. The amount of leakage at the joints should not exceed 2 quarts per hour per 100 joints irrespectively of pipe diameter. The leakage should be distributed • TION over all joints. If such leakage occurs at a few joints the installation should be considered unsatisfactory and necessary repairs made. New pipe laid with caulked lead or lead-substitute joints should, if the workmanship is satisfactory, have little or no leakage at the joints. Any joint having leakage or more than a"slight drip"or"weeping"should be repaired. Leakage should not exceed 1 oz. (liquid measure)per hour per inch of pipe diameter per joint. The leakage should be distributed over all joints. If such leakage occurs almost entirely at a few joints. the installation should be considered unsatisfactory and necessary repairs made. PNEUMATIC: Establish 40 PSI air pressure and measure pressure drop which should not exceed 1 1/2 PSI in 24 hours. Test pressure tanks at normal water level and air pressure, and measure air pressure drop which should not exceed 1 1/2 PSI in 24 hours. PART "B" - UNDERGROUND PIPING FEEDS BLDGS LOCATION PIPE TYPE AND CLASS TYPE JOINT GROUND UNDER- CONFORMS TO STANDARD YES 0 NO 0 IF NO, EXPLAIN PIPES • AND JOINTS NEEDING ANCHORAGE CLAMPED, STRAPPED OR BACKED IN ACCORDANCE YES❑ NO ❑ • WITH STANDARD JOINTS IF NO, EXPLAIN TESTS FLUSHING • HYDROSTATIC LEAKAGE REQUIRED NEW UNDERGROUND PIPING FLUSHED ACCORDING TO STANDARD YES 0 BY(COMPANY) HON WAS FLUSHING FLOW OBTAINED PUBLIC WATER 0 TANK OR RESERVOIR❑ FIRE PUMP 0 FLUSHING THROUGH WHAT TYPE OPENING HYD. BUTT. 0 OPEN PIPE 0 TESTS LEAD-INS FLUSHED ACCORDING TO STANDARD - YES ❑ • BY(COMPANY) • • HOW WAS FLUSHING FLOW OBTAINED PUBLIC WATER 0 TANK OR RESERVOIR ❑ FIRE PUMP❑ THROUGH WHAT TYPE OPENING Y CONN. TO FLANGE Si SPIGOT 0 OPEN PIPE❑ Form No. 85 Rev. • >Printed in U.S.A. HYDROSTATIC ALL NEW U -i-. AT d LT • o A TEST P.S.I. FOR HOURS • TOTAL MOUNT OF LEAKAGE MEASURED LEAKAGE GALS. HOURS TEST ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE GALS. HOURS NUMBER INSTALLED TYPE AND MATS HYDRANTS ALL OPERATE SATISFACTORILY YES❑ NO❑ CONROL WATER CONTROL VALVA LEFT MDR OPEN YES 0 NO 0 VALVES a NO, STATE REASON DATE LEFT IN SERVICE REMARKS NAME OF SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR FOR PROPERTY OWNER(SIGNED) TITLE PARTS A & B FOR SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR(SIGNED) DATE SIGNATURES PART "C" — SPRINKLER & WATER SPRAY ABOVE GR ND PIPING (FILL OUT SEPARATE PART' EACH RISER) SERVES BLDGS. LOCATION �� t g TESTS _'IV I HYDROSTATIC TEST OF PIPING REQUIRED 2 PNEUMATIC TEST OF ALL DRY PIPING 3 EQUIPMENT OPERATION TESTS OF ALL EQUIPMENT SPRINKLERS MAKE MODEL MZE QUANTITY TEMPERATURE URE OR / =-W, 3 j g" 44--) - .An, SPRAY NOZZLES PIPE AND MATERIAL AND KIM)CONFORMS TO ?..„r Z. 1TANDARD FITTINGS IF NONE, EXPLAIN ALARM VALVE ALARM DEVICE MAXIMUM TIME TO OPERATE THROUGH TEST PIPE OR FLOW Z.5...._ ie KE MODE /3 .. MIN. SEC. INDICATOR T -- 2. OPERATING TEST RESULTS WATER AIR TRIP TIME TIME TO TRIP PRESS. PRESS. POINT WATER ALARM DRY MAKE MODEL SER. THROUGH TEST PIPE REACHED OPERATED PIPE NO. WITHOUT WITH AIR TEST PROPERLY Q.O.D. Q.O. D. PRESS. OUTLET VALVES MIN. SEC. MIN. SEC. P.5.1. P.S.L P.S.I. MIN. I SEC. YES I NO 1 1 IF NO, EXPLAIN OPERATION PNEUMATIC ❑ ELECTRIC 0 HYDRAULIC 0 DELUGE PIPING SUPERVISED YES 0 NO❑ (DETECTING MEDIA SUPERVISED YES 0 NO 0 DOES VALVE OPERATE FROM THE MANUAL TRIP AND/OR REMOTE CONTROL STATIONS YES 0 NO 0 IS THERE AN ACCESSIBLE FACILITY IN EACH CIRCUIT FOR TESTING IF NO, EXPLAIN YES 0 NO 0 PREACTION DOES EACH CIRCUIT OPERATE DOES EACH CIRCUIT OPERATE MAXIMUM TIME TO MAKEMODEL SUPERVISION LOSS ALARM VALVE RELEASE OPERATE RELEASE VALVES YES NO YES NO MIN. SEC. ALL PIPING HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AT_��—, PSI FOR J HOURS DRY PIPING PNEUMATICALLY TESTED YES In NO TESTS EQUIPMENT OPERATE PROPERLY Y -Xc, NO❑ IF NO. STATE REASON VRA IN TEST: READI OF GAGE LOCATED NEAR M ATR 8 Y TEST PIPE: RESIDUAL PRESSURE M ITH VALVE4I T PIPE OPEN WIDE: STATIC PRESSURE �J PSI F. PSI BLANK NUMBER USED LOCATIDIE NUMBER REMOVED TESTING /U C GASKETS DATE LEFT IN SERVICE WITH ALL CONTROL.VALVES OPEN. REMARKS NAME 05,4PRINKLER C 40P J TITL PART „C,. ISS {FI •(I AC l N..eITOT �S F(A..if'l�ii SIGNATURES Fat E RA ',' ' s-. CONTRACTOR'S MATERIAL & TEST CERTIFICATE • SPRINKLER SYSTEMS -WATER SPRAY SYSTEMS PART "A" GENERAL PROCEDURE UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, INSPECTION AND TESTS SHOULD BE MADE BY CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE AND WITNESSED BY AN OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. ALLDEFECTS SHOULD BE CORRECTED AND SYSTEM LEFT IN SERVICE BEFORE CONTRACTOR'S MEN FINALLY LEAVE THE JOB. A CERTIFICATE SHOULD BE FILLED OUT AND SIGNED BY BOTH REPRESENTATIVES. COPIES SHOULD BE PREPARED FOR INSPECTING AUTHORITIES, OWNER AND CONTRACTOR. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE IN NO WAY PREJUDICES ANY CLAIM AGAINST CONTRACTOR FOR FAULTY MATERIAL, POOR WORKMANSHIP OR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH INSPECTING AUTHORITY'S REQUIREMENTS OR LOCAL ORDINANCES. PROPERTY NAME---- DATE r�rrf... S, l/'I I PROPERTY ADDRE • ACCEPTED BY INSPECTION AUTHORITY('S NAMES - V t— n,„...s- _ . -,4.A...) ., ,,bac4.40 „di...) ADDRESS _ PLANS INSTALLATION CONFORMS TO ACCEPTED PLANS YES NO 0 EQUIPMENT USED IS APPROVED • Y NO 0 IF NO, STATE DEVIATIONS • HAS PERSON IN CHARGE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT BEEN INSTRUCTED AS TO LOCATION OF CONTROLVALVES AND CARE OF THIS NEW EQUIPMENT Y NO 0 • INSTRUC- IF NO, EXPLAIN TIONS HAS A COPY OF INSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE CHART BEEN LEFT YES❑g NO 0 AT PLAN' /�j�"' IF NO, EXPLAIN FLUSHING: Flow the required rate until mains are clear as indicated by no collection of foreign material in burlap bags at outlets such as hydrants and blow-offs. Flush at flows not less than 750 GPM for 6-inch pipe and smaller, 1000 GPM for 8-inch. 1500 GPM for 10-inch. 2000 GPM for 12-inch. Where supply • TEST cannot produce stipulated flow rate, obtain maximum available by using properly sized discharge devices. HYDROSTATIC: Hydrostatic test should be made at not lees than 200 PSI for two hours or 50 PSI above static pr in excess of•150 PSI. Differential dry-pipe valve clappers should be left open during test to prevent damage. All above ground piping leakage should be stopped. DESCRIP• LEAKAGE: New pipe laid with rubber gasketed joints should, if the workmanship is satisfactory, have no leakage at the joints. Unsatisfactory amounts of leakage usually result from twisted, pinched or cut gaskets. However. some leakage might result from small amounts of grit or small imperfections. The amount of leakageat the joints should not exceed 2 quarts per hour per 100 joints irrespectively of pipe diameter. The leakage should be distributed TION over all joints. If such leakage occurs at a few joints the installation should be considered unsatisfactory and necessary repairs made. New pipe laid with caulked lead or lead-substitute joints should, if the workmanship is satisfactory, have little or no leakage at the joints. Any Joint having leakage or more than a"slight drip"or"weeping"should be repaired. Leakage should not exceed I oz. (liquid measure)per hour per inch of pipe diameter per joint. The leakage should be distributed over all joints. If such leakage occurs almost entirely at a few joints. the installation should be considered unsatisfactory and necessary repairs made. PNEUMATIC: Establish 40 PSI air pressure and measure pressure drop which should not exceed 1 1/2 PSI in 24 hours. Test pressure tanks at normal water level and air pressure. and measure air pressure drop which should not exceed l 1/2 PSI in 24 hours. PART "B" - UNDERGROUND PIPING FEEDS BLD4i6s...., ` �� LOCATION PIPE TYPE AND CLASS TYPE JOINT UNDER- J • GROUND CONFORMS TO STANDARD YES 0 - NO 0 IF NO, EXPLAIN • PIPES AND JOINTS NEEDING ANCHORAGE CLAMPED, STRAPPED OR BACKED IN ACCORDANCE • YES ❑ NO ❑ - WITH STANDARD JOINTS IF NO, EXPLAIN TESTS FLUSHING HYDROSTATIC LEAKAGE REQUIRED • NEW UNDERGROUND PIPING FLUSHED ACCORDING TO STANDARD YES 0 BY(COMPANY) • HOW WAS FLUSHING FLOW OBTAINED PUBLIC WATER 0 TANK OR RESERVOIR 0 FIRE PUMP 0 FLUSHING THROUGH WHAT TYPE OPENING . HYD. BUTT. 0 OPEN PIPE 0 TESTS LEAD-INS FLUSHED ACCORDING TO STANDARD YES ❑ BY(COMPANY) HOW WAS FLUSHING FLOW OBTAINED PUBLIC WATER 0 TANK OR RESERVOIR ❑ FIRE PUMP❑ THROUGH WHAT TYPE OPENING • Y CONN. TO FLANGE&SPIGOT 0 OPEN PIPE❑ Form No. S5 Rev. • Printed in U.S.A. +.a HYDROSTATIC ALL NEW U 7-r AT a LL 7-- • A TEST P.5.I. FOR HOURS TOTAL MOUNT OF LEAKAGE MEASURED LEAKAGE GALS HOURS TEST ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE GALS. HOURS NUMBER INSTALLED TYPE AND MAKE HYDRANTS ALL OPERATE SATISFACTORILY YES❑ NO O CONROL WATER CONTROL VALVES LETT WIDE OPEN YES 0 NO 0 VALVES IF NO. STATE REASON DATE LEFT IN SERVICE REMARKS NAME OF SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR FOR PROPERTY OWNER)SIGNED) TITLE PARTS A & I! FOR SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR(SIGNED) DATE SIGNATURES PART "C" — SPRINKLER & WATER SPRAY MOVE GROU PIPING (FILL OUT SEPARAT ART^C^FOR EACH RISER) SERVES BLDG,. LOCATION �,D .^" Z.---- ig / &(.--i( 4 TESTS 1 HYDROSTATIC TEST OF ALL PIPING REQUIRED 2 PNEUMATIC TEST OF ALL DRY PIPING 3 EQUIPMENT OPERATION TESTS OF ALL EQUIPMENT SPRINKLERS MAKE MODEL SIZE QUANTITY TEMPERATURE OR �.=-y 1772,40 4= / .43`' -1'.. ` . `�?. .4„ ' SPRAY NOZZLE S PIPE AND MATERIAL AND KIND CONFORMS TO /4.171:14 l 3/ C.—STANDARD FITTINGS IF NONE, EXPLAIN ALARM VALVE ALARM DEVICE MAXIMUM TIME TO OPERATE THROUGH TEST PIPE OR FLOW TYPE 1IE MODEL MIN. SEC. INDICATOR t ` t� _ '> FF// OPERATING TEST RESULTS WATER AIR TRIP TINE TIME TO TRIP PRESS. PRESS. POINT WATER ALARM DRY MAKE MODEL SER. THROUGH TEST PIPE REACHED OPERATED PIPE NO. WITHOUT WITH AIS TEST PROPERLY Q.O. D. Q. O. D. PRESS. OUTLET VALVES MIN. SEC. MIN. SEC. P.S.I. P.S.I. P.8.1. MIN. ! SEC. YES 1 NO IF NO, EXPLAIN OPERATION PNEUMATIC 0 ELECTR IC❑ HYDRAULIC 0 DELUGE PIPING SUPERVISED YES 0 No❑ !DETECTING MEDIA SUPERVISED YES 0 NO 0 DOES VALVE OPERATE FROM THE MANUAL TRIP AND/OR REMOTE CONTROL STATIONS YES 0 NO 0 IS THERE AN ACCESSIBLE FACILITY IN EACH CIRCUIT FOR TESTING IF NO, EXPLAIN YES NO 0 PREACTION DOES EACH CIRCUIT OPERATE DOES EACH CIRCUIT OPERATE MAXIMUM TIME TO MA MODEL SUPERVISION LOSS ALARM VALVE RELEASE OPERATE RELEASE VALVES YES NO YES NO MIN. SEC. ALL PIPING HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AT v PSI FOR HOURS DRY PIPING PNEUMATICALLY TESTED YES D NOD TESTS EQUIPMENT OPERATE PROPERLY Yd,p�., NOD IF NO, STATE REASON Via IN TEST: READING OF GAGE LOCATED NEAR V AT SUPPLY TEST PIPE: RESIDUAL PRESSURE WITH VALVE IN TF�Tej,EE OPEN WIDE: STATIC PRESSURE PSI F�S PSI BLANK NUMBER USEDATIONS NUMBER REMOVED TESTING D(J GASKETS _ DATE LEFT IN SERVICE WITH ALL CONTROL VALVES OPEN. REMARKS WNAM6 OF SPRINKLER CO ACTOR \VT' \} 77171,1 Fier-C,t4a ly "1�E PART ..C.. 1.1pp [[ � �, {r ' SIGNATURES FOR BP ER Ct �lX • • CONTRACTOR'S MATERIAL & TEST CERTIFICATE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS -WATER SPRAY SYSTEMS • PART "A" GENERAL • •PROCEDURE UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, INSPECTION AND TESTS SHOULD BE MADE BY CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE AND WITNESSED BY AN OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. ALL DEFECTS SHOULD BE CORRECTED AND SYSTEM LEFT IN SERVICE BEFORE CONTRACTOR'S MIEN FINALLY LEAVE THE JOB. A CERTIFICATE SHOULD BE FILLED OUT AND SIGNED BY BOTH REPRESENTATIVES. COPIES SHOULD BE PREPARED FOR INSPECTING AUTHORITIES, OWNER AND CONTRACTOR. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE IN NO WAY PREJUDICES ANY CLAIM AGAINST CONTRACTOR FOR FAULTY MATERIAL, POOR WORKMANSHIP Oft FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH INSPECTING AUTHORITY'S REQUIREMENTS OR LOCAL ORDINANCES. PROPERTY NAME DATE .rMr s, S t,'%-CVC PROPERTY ADDR ACCEPTED BY INSPECTION AUTHORITY('S NAMES ADDRESS \ OF E • PLANS INSTALLATION CONFORMS TO ACCEPTED PLANS YES NO 0 EQUIPMENT USED IS APPROVED Y NO 0 IF NO, STATE DEVIATIONS • • HAS PERSON IN CHARGE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT BEEN INSTRUCTED AS TO LOCATION OF CONTROL VALVES AND CARE OF THIS NEW EQUIPMENT YES NO 0 INSTRUC- IF NO, EXPLAIN TIONS HAS A COPY OF INSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE CHART BEEN LEFT • YES*, NO 0 AT PLANT IF NO, EXPLAIN • • FLUSHING: Flow the required rate until niains are clear as indicated by no collection of"foreign material in burlap bags at outlets such as hydrants and blow-offs. Flush at flows not less than 750 GPM for 6-inch pipe and smaller, 1000 GPM for 8-inch, 1500 GPM for 10-inch. 2000 GPM for 12-inch. Where supply TEST cannot produce stipulated flow rate, obtain maximum available by using properly sized discharge devices. HYDROSTATIC: Hydrostatic test should be made at not less than 200 PSI for two hours or 50 PSI above static pressure in excess of 150 PSI. Differential dry-pipe valve clappers should be left open during test to prevent damage. All above ground piping leakage should be stopped. DESCRIP- LEAKAGE: New pipe laid with rubber gasketed joints should, if the workmanship is satisfactory, have no leakage at the joints. Unsatisfactory amounts of leakage usually result from twisted, pinched or cut gaskets. However, some leakage might result from small amounts of grit or small imperfections. The amount of leakage at the joints should not exceed 2 quarts per hour per 100 joints irrespectively of pipe diameter. The leakage should be distributed TION over alt joints. If such leakage occurs at a few joints the installation should be considered unsatisfactory and necessary repairs made. New pipe laid with caulked lead or lead-substitute joints should. if the workmanship is satisfactory, have little or no leakage at the joints. Any joint having leakage or more than a"slight drip"or"weeping"should be repaired. Leakage should not exceed 1 oz. (liquid measure)per hour per inch of pipe diameter per joint. The leakage should be distributed over all joints. If such leakage occurs almost entirely at a few joints, the installation should be considered unsatisfactory and necessary repairs made. PNEUMATIC: Establish 40 PSI air pressure and measure pressure drop which should not exceed 1 1/2 PSI in 24 hours. Test p tanks at normal water level and air pressure. and measure air pressure drop which should not exceed 1 1/2 PSI in 24 hours. PART "II" - UNDERGROUND PIPING FEEDS B LOCATION PIPE TYPE AND CLASS / TYPE JOINT UNDER- GROUND CONFORMS TO STANDARD YES 0 NO ❑ IF NO, EXPLAIN PIPES AND JOINTS NEEDING ANCHORAGE CLAMPED, STRAPPED OR BACKED IN ACCORDANCE YES❑ •NO ❑ • WITH STANDARD JOINTS IF NO, EXPLAIN TESTS • FLUSHING HYDROSTATIC LEAKAGE REQUIRED NEW UNDERGROUND PIPING FLUSHED ACCORDING TO STANDARD YES 0 BY(COMPANY) • HOW WAS FLUSHING FLOW OBTAINED • PUBLIC WATER 0 TANK OR RESERVOIR 0 FIRE PUMP❑ FLUSHING THROUGH WHAT TYPE OPENING • HYD. BUTT. ❑ OPEN PIPE;0 • TESTS LEAD-INS FLUSHED ACCORDING TO STANDARD YES 0 BY(COMPANY) HOW WAS FLUSHING FLOW OBTAINED PUBLIC WATER ❑ TANK OR RESERVOIR ❑ FIRE PUMP 0 THROUGH WHAT TYPE OPENING • Y CONN, TO FLANGE SPIGOT 0 OPEffitOE 0 Form No. 85 Rev. • Printed in U.S.A. r- HYDROSTATIC ALL NEW U • - -AT .+ LY -r--- . A TEST P.S.I. FOR HOURS TOTAL MOUNT OF LEA/CACI MANORED LEAKAGE GALT. HOURS TEST ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE GALS. HOURS NUMBER INSTALLED TYPE AND MAKE HYDRANTS ALL OPERATE SATISFACTORILY YES❑ NO p CONROLWATER CONTROL VALVES LEFT WIDE OPEN YES 0 NO 0 VALVES IF NO, STATE REASON DATE LEFT IN SERVICE REMARKS NAME OF SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR FOR PROPERTY OWNER(SIGNED) TITLE PARTS A & B FOR SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR(SIGNED) DATE SIGNATURES PART "C" - SPRINKLER & WATER SPRAY ABOV OUND PIPING (FILL OUT SEPARA - PART"C"FOR EACH RISER) SERVES BLOCS. ` - LOCATION ��,. Q�� rJ, 4 &c__./ 6„ TESTS 1 HYDROSTATIC T ALL PIPIAIG REQUIRED 2 PNEUMATIC TEST OF ALL DRY PIPING 3 EQUIPMENT OPERATION TESTS OF ALL EQUIPMENT �--, �_ SPRINKLERS MAKE MODEL SIZE QUANTITY TEMPERATURE �,,/ RATING OR l�i-72,,et-_ I 51411 4-0 c� -C�,�lses c' SPRAY NOZZLES PIPE AND MATERIAL AND KIND CONFORMS TO ti&-f'rL4- Z3i C..-STANDARD FITTINGS IF NONE, EXPLAIN ALARM VALVE ALARM DEVICE MAXIMUM TIME TO OPERATE THROUGH TEST PIPE OR FLOW ti TYPE MAKE MODEL MIN. SEC. INDICATOR ,� 6:477-----)-1- 1;;I CI OPERATING TEST RESULTS WATER AIR TRIP TINE TIME TO TRIP PRESS. PRESS. POINT WATER ALARM DRY MAKE MODEL SER. THROUGH TEST PIPE REACHED OPERATED AIR PIPE NO. WITHOUT WITH TEST PROPERLY Q.O.D. Q.O. D. PRESS. OUTLET VALVES MIN. SEC. MIN. SEC._ P.11.1. P.S.L P.5.1. MIN. I SEC. YES I NO IF NO, EXPLAIN OPERATION PNEUMATIC ❑ ELECTRIC 0 HYDRAULIC 0 DELUGE PIPING SUPERVISED YES 0 NO❑ ,DETECTING MEDIA SUPERVISED YES 0 NO 0 DOES VALVE OPERATE FROM THE MANUAL TRIP AND/OR REMOTE CONTROL STATIONS YES 0 NO 0 & IS THERE AN ACCESSIBLE FACILITY IN EACH CIRCUIT FOR TESTING IF NO, EXPLAIN YES❑ NO 0 PRE ACT ION DOES EACH CIRCUIT OPERATE DOES EACH CIRCUIT OPERATE MAXIMUM TIME TO MODEL SUPERVISION LOBS ALARM VALVE RELEASE OPERATE RELEASE MAKEVALVES YES NO YES NO MIN. SEC. ALL PIPING HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AT L7 �P"s PSI FOR HOURS ` DRY PIPING PNEUMATICALLY TESTED YES O NOD TESTS EQUIPMENT OPERATE PROPERLY YEL1 j NOD IF NO STATE REASON TE,a=) "D41 IN TEST: READING OF GAGE LOCATED NEAR PATER S PLY TEST PIPE: RESIDUAL PRESSURE PITH VALVETEST PIPE OPEN WIDE: ."-"---111.7711 � 1 STATIC PRESSURE ."76 N s` PSI , l 5 PSI BLANK NUMBER USED -- jj LOCATIONS NUMBER REMOVED GASKETSTESTING 00/J t DATE LEFT IN SERVICE WITH ALL CONTROL VALVES OPEN. REMARKS NAME OF SPRINKLEROP ER. , .) TE PART .C. u eCe �MR0_6t.) A (leillaY(114 SIGNATURES s NKLER Iao -6/ / , JUL-18-1995 11:03 FROM TSP/EOS TO 6814360 P.02• 2 • • TSP Eos CODE ANALYSIS INTERSTATE CROSSING Prepared by TSP(Eos. Incl. Architects and Engineers June 6, 1995 tnfice'in RocbcNter and hTinn<eatxdis MN (Revised June 9,1995: m r'rected Building 2 floor area,and parking stall quantities) 7 Si'/r us (Revised Jar 1X.1995:provided tho allowable area ealemistogas ferBiennit2. '1 WO+trr stenet 1;[CCiGlpr,MN 5537I Plumbing Fixture CoUUnt/Ratios by others. FA E(612)474-3(.128 ThL(612)474_3291 Energy Analysis wide separate cover. Member of TSP Group; R<xhectter,MN Applicable Cosi s; . Minncapoiic.MN Denver.CO State Building Code Ciltuttu.WY 1994 Uniform Building Code Rapid City,SI) City of Eagan ordlnance� Sheridan.WY Sioux 1'411..Su ZONING: Marshalltown.IA „, : Site area= 8.917;ac.=388,424 s.f. Building area. 10,080 s.f. Floor/area ratio;28.3% Parking require” For Office space: 1 stall per 150 s.f. For Warehouse+a= 1 stall per 400 a.f, up to 6000 s.f.,then 1 stall per 800 s,f, additional area. Office Q 25% 47,700 s.f.=185 stalls Warehouse @+ 73%=83„108 s.f.= 112 stalls Parking stalls required.--297 Parking providedr=263*. (including 8 hdcc stalls) Lot 2: Site area=1,7 ac.= 74052 s.f. Building Area= 1,600 s.f. Floor/area ratio '29.1% Parking required For Office space1 stall per 150 s.f. For Warehouse space: 1 stall per 400 s.f.up to 6000 Lf.,then 1 stall per 800 LE additional area. Office area=3043 s.f. = 20 stalls An Fw.l Ommwnuy. Warehouse area a 18,600 41.=31 stalls Affirmative Action Fmploycr Parking stalls recluired= 51. Parting stalls prllvi(eA=47.* (including 2 hdcp stalls) I , . JUL-18-1995 11:04 FROM TSP/EOS TO 6814360 P.03 CodeAnalysis -- Interstate Crossing. TSP Eos Page 2 Architects and Enginters * Parking Stal counts arc taken from Schoell&Madson, Inc. Site Plan dated 5-12-95. Offices in Rochester and Minnexpolir..MN rsv/rens setbacks:The building and parking plan locations conform to all of the required 21 Water Street front, side.and rear yarn f aetbadlc hues. Exa;lsior.MN 55331 FAX(612)474.3923 Occupancy rt.,gg�`���Ma "ni TEL(612)474-3291 Groups B and S-2(officer and warehouse-non-combustible storage) Member of TSP Graua: Roct,ctcr.MN ,11uildin;Areas: - Minneupolis.MN Denver.CO Building 1; 640' x 172',e 110,080 s.f. Gillette.WYBuilding 2; 200' x 100' eF 20' x 80' = 20,000+ 1600=21,600 s.f. Rapid City.SD Sheridan.wY Construction TYve : IJ N; sinnle story FhBv nMered Marshalltown,1A Table 5-A; The exterior*alls are non-combustible precast concrete. Allowable Areae; Based on UBC Section 515.2,Building 1 may be of unlimited area due to the inclusion of a complete automatic sprinkles system and yard dimensions on all sides beim in excess of the required 60k, and Building 2 has a basic allowable area of2,000 s.f on all aides 40' or more,stud is sprinklcrcd providing for a total allowable area 12,000 x 2 x 3 =72,000., tke • _1i. _.1 •t: g ,. -- •• • 11_ T 1 D' • n_ - x0.00 e • For Building 1; h/Ahbt($ z) RL Per 40'bay in Building 1i office area=46'* x 40' = 1,840 s.f. Table 10-A; 100 al./person= 19 Per 40' bay in Building 11: warehouse area=90'*x 40' =3.600 sl Table 10-A; 500 s.fJperson=8. *Estimated areas based on preliminary plans. Total occupant load per 40' bay in Building 1 =27 persons. Each bay must be provided with one(1)exit. Two(2)are provided. The required exit width in inches is.2 x occupant load per Section 1003.3 = .2 x 27=5.4". The total exit width provided in each bay is 72". Ail EOM Opportunity. The maximum allowable,travel distance in a fully sprinklered building is 200' per Atli-illative Action Section 1003.4.1.The maximum travel distance for Building 1 is estimated to be not Dupla)t r more than 95'. I J FJL—id—t'J'J 11:04 FRUM F5P/E05 TO 6814360 ?.@4 Code Analysis -- Integtate Crossing Page 3 TSP os Architects and Engineers For Buntline 2: Offices in Rochester and Minneapolis.MN Assume this building contains 14.4% Office Occupancy and 85.6%Warehouse Tsp/EQS Occupancy 7.1 Water StreAt lixceWtor.MN 55331 Total Building Area x 144% Office Space = 21,600 x.14.4= 3,111 s.L PAX(G 12)474-3928 TEL(612)474-3291 Office load = area divided by 100 per Table 10-A, = 3,111 s.f11OO = 32 persons. McnTher of TSP Grvvp: Total Building Area x 85,6%=Warehouse Space= 21,600 x.856 = 18,490 s.L Ftrichr.FLCr,M\ Warehouse toad = area divided by 300 per Table 10-A = 18,490/300 = 62 persons. MinncapoIi ,MN Denver.Co Total Building Occupaat'j.�oad = 32+62 = 94. wird..WY Two(2)exits are require0.Three(3)are provided. Rapid City.SD Sheridan.rr,.Wy Required exit width in ialbes = occupant load x.2 = 94 x.2= 19". 144"are S.oux full•.SD provided. Marshalltown.L1 The maximum estimatedkjravel distance for Building 2 is 132'. 95719/doe cadestsl.doc Au F:c{unl opyvavnity. Affirmative Action Employer TOTAL P.04 JUL-18-'1995 11 03 FROM TSP/EOS TO 6814360 P.01 • `�' OS 21 WATER STREET '� EXCELSIOR,M NESOTA 55331 PHONE 612-474-3291 FAX 612-474-3925 Architect%and Engineers FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1r -- °L Ta CrI dr--- {-16.4K Fax cf---at-7 V°L. .0 '61-0 , FPI/. "rt. RE: FS/Vet, e.0Ac ��N�2 �s t'1 TSP/Bos 3 !t J N2 7A-7E C4 g 5j r IV�-- NUMBER OF PAGES ( i ) INCLUDING COVER SHEET: Original will be sent via: ( jMail ( )Messenger ( )Federal Express ( )Will Not Be Sent Comments: cs s ,, SIGNED: fet 1A4 C PLEASE CALL IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS FAX St *dudrrcc .dcc Braun Intertec Corporation BRAUN' 6950 West 146th Street,Suite 131 Apple Valley,Minnesota 55124-8520 I N T E RT E C 612-431-4493 Fax:431-3084 Engineers and Scientists Serving the Built and Natural Environments November 20, 1995 Project BODX-95-200C Mr. John M. Allen Industrial Equity 1660 South Highway 100, Suite 530-6W Minneapolis, MN 55416 Dear Mr. Allen: Re: Summary Report for Construction Testing Services and Special Inspections, Interstate Crossing, Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle, Eagan, Minnesota As you authorized, we have performed construction testing services and special inspections at the Interstate Crossing buildings in Eagan, Minnesota. This report provides a summary of the construction testing services and special inspections. Site Grading Braun Intertec Corporation (Braun Intertec) performed excavation observations and compaction testing during the site grading for the two buildings at the Interstate Crossing project. The results of our observations and compaction tests were summarized in our report dated August 17, 1995,Braun Intertec Project BODX-95-107C. The report was previously submitted and is attached to this report. The compaction tests performed in the wall backfill and loading dock ramps are attached to this report. Footing and Reinforcing Observations Prior to concrete placement, random hand auger probes were performed in the footing and column pad areas. The hand auger probes generally encountered poorly graded sand with silt and clayey sand which were judged to be in a medium dense condition. Prior to concrete placement, observations of the footings, interior column pads and walls with transverse reinforcing was conducted. In addition, Brawl Intertec observed the placement of the concrete for footings, interior column pads and reinforced walls which contained transverse reinforcing. Based on our observations, the reinforcing in these areas was placed in general accordance with the available construction plans and specifications. We have attached the special inspector daily report forms which provide a summary of our observations of the reinforcing, a copy of which was left on site after our observation. Industrial Equity Project BODX-95-200C • November 20, 1995 Page 2 Concrete Testing Braun Intertec cast concrete test cylinders for the footings, column pads, loading dock walls and slab-on-grade. The concrete tests met the specified 28-day strength requirements. Results of the concrete compression tests were previously submitted and are attached to this report. Structural Steel Observations Nondestructive examination services were performed on this project during erection of the precast and structural steel. The results of our structural steel observations were previously submitted in our daily observation reports. Our final structural steel nondestructive examination services report will be completed and a copy sent to you within ten 'ng days. Summary Based on the results of our excavation observations, hand auger probes and compaction testing, it is our opinion the soils encountered and the fill soils placed are suitable for footing and floor slab support. Based on the results of our observations, the footings, column pads and reinforced walls with transverse reinforcing was placed in general accordance with the available construction plans and specifications. Based on the results of our concrete tests, it appears the foundation, wall and floor slab concrete met the 28-day strength requirements. Based on the results of our structural steel observations, the welds and bolting were found acceptable. General Services performed by the geotechnical engineers for this project have been conducted with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Industrial Equity Project BODX-95-200C November 20, 1995 Page 3 Thank you for using Braun Intertec for this project. If you have any questions regarding this summary report, please call Jim Samuelson at (612) 431-4493. Sincerely, ad ir . ones M. Samuelson Office Manager Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this report was prepared under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 441/1/1 WONn John T. Carlson, PE Senior Engineer Registration Number: 20663 Attachments: Summary Report for Excavation Observations and Compaction Testing Report of Field Compaction Tests, Reports 1 through 17 Proctors P-1 through P4 Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinders, Sets 1 through 25 Special Ins.- or Dail R- •.rt Forms Re.•its 1 through 6 • ctural Steel Report (will follow under separate cover) c: Mr. Jeff Wellman; Rochon Corporation Mr. Joe Voels; City of Eagan Building Inspection jms\jtc:rlb\95200c\tpt August 17, 1995 Project BODX-95-107C Mr. Jeff Wellman Rochon Corporation 12866 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Mr. Wellman Re: Summary Report for Construction Testing Services, Interstate Crossing, Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle, Eagan, Minnesota As you authorized on May 16, 1995, we have performed excavation observations and compaction testing at the Interstate Crossing commercial project. The purpose of the excavation observations was to aid in evaluating the suitability of the soils exposed in the excavation bottoms for fill and foundation support. The purpose of the compaction testing was to aid in evaluating the suitability of the engineered fill soils placed for foundation support. Available Information We were provided with a geotechnical evaluation report prepared by American Engineering Testing, Inc. The report is titled, "Geotechnical Exploration and Review for Proposed Interstate Crossing", Project Number AET95-1310," dated April 3, 1995. Two commercial buildings will be constructed. Both buildings will be slab-on-grade, one-level structures supported by spread footing foundations. We assume the footings will be designed for a soil bearing pressure of up to 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf). Excavation Observations The excavation observations were conducted by senior engineering assistant and engineering assistant from June 9 to July 7, 1995. Random, shallow (about 3 feet deep) hand auger probes were used to assist in evaluating the excavation bottom soils. Estimates of the soil consistency or density were based on the penetration and turning resistances of the hand auger probes. Soil classifications were determined in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) procedures by examining the hand auger probe cuttings. • Rochon Corporation Project BODX-95-107C August 17, 1995 Page 2 The excavating contractor used a backhoe the dozer to remove existing fill, topsoil and/or soft clays from the building areas. The sidewalls of the excavations indicated the bottom of the excavations extended into the underlying stiff lean clay and/or medium dense poorly graded sand with silt. Groundwater was not encountered during the excavation observations. Based on the construction staking provided by others, approximately 20 to 23 feet of oversizing was provided in the excavations for the two building pads. The attached sketches outline the approximate bottom of excavation elevations, oversizing and excavation limits. Compaction Testing A total of 69 compaction tests and four retests were taken in the fill placed to establish footing • and floor slab grade. All tests or retests met or exceeded the minimum compaction requirement of 95 percent of standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698). The results of the compaction tests and Proctor curves were previously submitted and are attached to this report. Conclusions Based on the soil borings, excavation observations and hand auger probes, it is our opinion the stiff lean clay and medium dense poorly graded sand with silt soils encountered in the excavation bottoms are adequate for fill and foundation support. Based on the construction staking provided by others, the excavations appear adequately oversized. Based on the results of our compaction tests, the fill appears adequate for foundation and floor slab support. General Services performed by the geotechnical engineers for this project have been conducted with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. } Rochon Corporation Project BODX-95-107C August 17, 1995 Page 3 Thank you for using Braun Intertec for this project. If you have any questions regarding this summary report, or if we can be of further assistance to you, please call Joe Friederichs or John Carlson at (612)431-4493. Sincerely, \\\x4r4 Joseph M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this report was prepared under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. IPA44 W404,\ John T. Carlson, PE Senior Engineer Registration Number: 20663 Attachments: Excavation Observation Sketches 1 and 2 Report of Field Compaction Tests, Reports 1 through 14 Proctors P-1 through P-3 c: Building Inspection Department; City of Eagan jmf/jtc:paa\95107c\ltr s. #3an91J - I s m v >00 XI rri z z � z I II N Q -I X ip C'.) i c--) c{ N co\ s N to ko CTI CTI f*I CD rmu W W X rn Cai �jrco 'pr � d < /. CD D m r9 I �ocu 0. cl N --I-I I CD C7 7_ 2 I ( I 1 ® m IIcoL_ _I 4. ; I I1 I I I I I I I I I I .. R iii_....._._ _ _ __ _ _ _Z ge __I F, . rn , rn73 C n Z 1 Cut to Grade 874 i ► 874 < 870 1 I ! FFE = 874 t 1 r 868 1 874 1 1 1 I 857 I \ 874 { d 1 i Iq 853 858 ! 4 13 t:E!)—_ Q.93 — — — — — Approximate Excavation Limits Approximate Building Lines © Approximate Bottan of Excavation Elevation • EXCAVATION OBSERVATION INT j DATE 1SHEET B RAU N' Proposed Interstate Crossing DRAWN BY: Jf 8/11/99 1 Building 1 APP.D BY: JTC I 8/11/95or INTE RTEC No. Lone Oak Road & Lone Oak Circle BOOR-95-107C 2 Eagan, Minnesota DWG.No. 4 HGURE# SCALE 11I = 100' ! 1 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 29, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 1 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) Comments 1 6/10/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 9 111 100 95 A 2 6/10/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 9 109 98 95 A 3 6/10/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 13 111 100 95 A 4 6/10/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 6 111 100 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 1 55'N, 10'W of the southeast building corner 849 2 40'N, 10'W of the southeast building corner 851 3 40'N, 20'W of the southeast building corner 853 4 10'N, 10'W of the southeast building corner 853 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation ...___ Jos-• M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.1 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 30, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 2 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pct) (%) (pct) (%) (%) Comments 5 6/12/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 19 107 96 95 A 6 6/12/95 N P-3: SC 12 123' 14 118 95 95 A 7 6/12/95 N P-2: SP-SM 9' 126% 8 124 98 95 A 8 6/12/95 N P-2: SP-SM 9% 126% 8 122 96 95 A 9 6/12/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/2 1261/2 8 123 97 95 A 10 6/13/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/2 126% 10 126 99 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 5 40'N, 10'W of the southeast building corner 855 6 40'N, 15'W of the southeast building corner 857 7 15'N, 75'W of the southeast building corner 857 8 15'N, 65'W of the southeast building corner 855 9 40'N, 65'W of the southeast building corner 859 10 30'N, 3'W of the southeast building corner 859 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation \psT( Joseph M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cu.2 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 29, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 3 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pc') (%) (pct) (%) (%) Comments 11 6/14/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231/2 8 122 99 95 A 12 6/14/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231/2 9 121 98 95 A 13 6/14/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231/2 8 122 99 95 A 14 6/15/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231/2 15 118 96 95 A 15 6/15/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231/2 15 117 95 95 A 16 6/15/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231/2 14 120 97 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 11 10'S, 40'W of the southeast building corner 856 12 10'S, 60'W of the southeast building corner 857 13 10'S, 100'W of the southeast building corner 859 14 10'N, 70'W of the northeast building corner 958 15 30'N, 80'W of the northeast building corner 958 16 60'N, 20'W of the northeast building corner 960 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Vit Jos M. F ederichs Engineering Assistant 951076cts.3 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 30, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 4 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density'' Inplace Dry Relative Minimum II) and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pct) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) Comments 17 6/16/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/2 126% 12 127 100 95 A 18 6/16/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91h 126% 11 127 100 95 A 19 6/16/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91 1261/z 11 123 97 95 A 20 6/19/95 N P-3: SC 12 123% 11 124 100 95 A 21 6/19/95 N P-3: SC 12 123% 9 122 98 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 17 70'S, 15'W of the northeast building corner 861 18 70'S, 60'W of the northeast building corner 861 19 20'N, 30W of the northeast building corner 863 20 10'N, 10'W of the southeast building corner 863 21 30'N, 15'W of the southeast building corner 862 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Jose. M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.4 • BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 30, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 5 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) Comments 22 6/20/95 N P-3: SC 12 123'/ 13 117 95 95 A 23 6/20/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231 14 120 97 95 A 24 6/20/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231 11 124 100 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location I Elevation 22 20'N, 80'W of the southeast building corner 864 23 30'S, 130'W of the southeast building corner 870 24 70'S, 150'W of the southeast building corner 869 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation w Josep M. Fri ricks 4-11 Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.5 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 30, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 6 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) Comments 25 6/20/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 17 107 96 95 A 26 6/20/95 N P-3: SC 12 123% 5 122 98 95 A 27 6/20/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231 13 123 100 95 A 28 6/21/95 N P-3: SC 12 123% 11 120 97 95 A 29 6/21/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/2 126% 8 127 100 95 A 30 6/21/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91 1261/2 7 127 100 95 A 31 6/21/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/2 1261/z 7 127 100 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 25 5'N, 50'W of the southeast building corner 866 26 50'N, 75'W of the southeast building corner 869 27 60'S, 140'W of the northeast building corner 871 28 40'S, 100'W of the northeast building corner 871 29 40'S, 20'W of the northeast building corner 868 30 20'N, 20'W of the southeast building corner 864 31 35'N, 150'W of the southeast building corner 867 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation gi Joseph M. Fri erichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.6 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 30, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 7 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) Comments 32 6/22/95 N P-3: SC 12 123% 11 119 97 95 A 33 6/22/95 N P-3: SC 12 123% 8 116 95 95 A 34 6/22/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91 126% 6 124 98 95 A 35 6/22/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91 126% 8 126 100 95 A 36 6/22/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/2 126% 11 127 100 95 A 37 6/22/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/z 126% 7 127 100 95 A 38 6/22/95 N P-2: SP-SM 9% 126% 10 122 96 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 32 30'N, 70'W of the southeast building corner 868 33 40'N, 175'W of the southeast building corner 872 34 30'S, 150'W of the southeast building corner 873 35 20'N, 20'W of the southeast building corner 866 36 15'N, 175'W of the southeast building corner 869 — 37 Station 3+50, 15' right of centerline -3 38 Station 3+50, 7' right of centerline -5 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation J s h Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.7 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: June 30, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 8 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inpiace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (pct) (%) (%) Comments 39 6/22/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91 1261 8 120 95 95 A 40 6/23/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231 18 111 90 95 B 41 6/23/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231 24 106 86 95 B Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location I Elevation 39 Station 3+50 -7 40 15'N, 100'W of the southeast building corner 969 41 60'S, 150'W of the southeast building corner 972 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation IL Jo h�M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 951076cts.8 • ., BRAUN' I NTE RTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: July 28, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 9 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pct) (%) (pct) (%) (%) Comments 40A 6/30/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231 12 123 100 95 A 41A 6/30/95 N P-3: SC 12 123% 12 123 100 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test I Test Location Elevation 40A Retest of 40 869 41A Retest of 41 872 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation 617; J sep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.9 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: August 2, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 10 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) Comments 42 7/6/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/2 126% 8 120 95 95 A 43 7/6/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91 126% 12 122 97 " 95 A 44 7/6/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/z 126% 8 • 111 88 95 B 45 7/6/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91 126% 6 124 98 95 A 46 7/6/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/ 126% 10 122 97 95 A 44A 7/6/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91h 1261h 9 125 99 95 A 47 7/6/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/s 126% 4 120 95 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location LElevation 42 Building 2, 5'N, 40'W of southeast building corner 864 43 Building 2, 5'N, 70'W of southeast building corner 862 44 Building 2, 15'N of southwest building corner 850 45 Building 2, 10'N, 5'E of southwest building corner 852 46 Building 1, 20'N, 20'E of southeast building corner 871 44A Retest of 44 850 47 Building 1, 50'N, 50'W of southeast building corner 873 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation \NA- YltiViA4A..- Joseplh M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.10 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: July 28, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 11 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (pci) (%) (%) Comments 48 7/8/95 N P-i: SP-SM 13 111 9 108 97 95 A 49 7/8/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 17 110 99 95 A 50 7/8/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231 11 118 96 95 A 51 7/8/95 N P-3: SC 12 123% 10 120 97 95 A 52 7/8/95 N P-3: SC 12 123' it 117 95 95 A • Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 48 Building 2, 20'N, 20'E of southwest building corner 853 49 Building 2, 40'N, 20'E of southwest building corner 8531% 50 Building 2, 10'N, 5'E of southwest building corner 8551 51 Building 2, 40'N, 10'E of southwest building corner 856 52 Building 2, 10'N, 50'E of southwest building corner 8561% Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation A � J seph M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.i 1 • BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: July 28, 1995 Project BODX-95-107C Report: 12 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inpiace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inpiace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pct) (%) (pd) (%) (%) Comments 53 7/10/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 10 113 100 95 A 54 7/10/95 N P-i: SP-SM 13 111 9 111 100 95 A 55 7/10/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 9 111 100 95 A 56 7/10/95 N _ P-i: SP-SM 13 111 9 114 100 95 A _ 57 7/10/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 9 111 100 95 A 58 7/11/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 7 111 100 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 53 Building 2, 10'N, 10'E of southwest building corner 858 _ 54 Building 2, 40'N, 60'E of southwest building corner 860 _ 55 Building 2, 5'S, 30'E of southwest building corner 861 56 Building 2, 5'N, 30'E of southwest building corner 863_ 57 Building 2, 35'N, 15'E of southwest building corner 864 58 Building 2, 5'N, 15'W of southwest building corner 864 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation J sep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cu.12 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: July 28, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 13 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inpiace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inpiace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (WO (%) (%) Comments 60 7/12/95 N P-2: SP-SM 121/ 1261 6 125 99 95 A 61 7/12/95 N P-2: SP-SM 121/ 1261/2 7 122 96 95 A 62 7/13/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 7 111 100 95 A 63 7/13/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 6 111 100 95 A 64 7/14/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231% 5 117 95 95 A 65 7/14/95 N P-3: SC 12 1231 6 121 98 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 60 Building 2, 20'N, 20'E of southwest building corner 865 61 Building 2, 40'N, 20'E of southwest building corner 866 62 Building 2, 25'N, 10'E of southwest building corner 868 63 Building 2, 30'N, 40'E of southwest building corner 868 64 Building 2, 45'N, 20'E of southwest building corner 870 65 Building 2, 10'N, BYE of southwest building corner 870 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation cJS ri M. Friederichs eP Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.13 • BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: July 28, 1995 Project BODX-95-107C Report: 14 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) Comments 66 7/17/95 N P-3: SC 12 123'% 14 119 96 95 A 67 7/17/95 N P-3: SC 12 123'% 7 115 93 95 A 68 7/18/95 N P-2: SP-SM 9' 126% 8 120 95 95 A 69 7/18/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91 126% 12 122 96 95 A 67A 7/17/95 N P-3: SC 12 123' 12 122 99 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 66 Building 2, 20'N, 10'E of southwest building corner 872 67 Building 2, 30'N, 40'E of southwest building corner 872 68 Building 2, 10'N,50'E of southwest building corner 874 69 Building 2, 50'N, 70'E of southwest building corner 874 67A Retest of 67 872 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation UGv Y/"t 4,4 J s M. Friedenchs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.14 BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: September 29, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 15 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) Comments 70 9/11/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/ 1261% 7 123 97 95 A 71 9/11/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91/z 1261 7 123 97 95 A 72 9/11/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 9 112 101 95 A 73 9/11/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 10 110 99 95 A 74 9/11/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 12 108 97 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 70 2'N, 25'W of the northeast building corner (exterior backfill) 880 71 2'N, 130'W of the northeast building corner (exterior backfill) 880 72 30'S, 2'W of the northeast building corner (interior backfill) 883 73 65'S, 2'W of the northeast building corner (interior backfill) 882 74 2'S, 70'W of the northeast building corner (interior backfill) 883 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group Joseph M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.15 BRAUN"' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: October 6, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 16 Client Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density'' Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pct) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) Comments 75 9/12/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91 1261 10 122 96 95 A 76 9/12/95 N P-2: SP-SM 91 1261 11 123 97 95 A 77 9/12/95 N P-2: SP-SM 9% 126% 11 124 98 95 A 78 9/12/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 13 108 97 95 A 79 9/12/95 N P-1: SP-SM 13 111 13 109 98 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 75 2'N, 50'E of the northwest building corner (exterior backfill) 880 76 2'N, 145'E of the northwest building corner (exterior backfill) 880 77 2'S, 160'E of the northwest building corner (interior backfill) 883 78 50'N, 2'E of the southwest building corner (interior backfill) 883 79 90'N, 2'E of the southwest building corner (interior backfill) 883 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group Jos .h . Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.16 • V' BRAUN' INTERTEC Report of Field Compaction Tests Date: October 9, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Report: 17 Client: Project Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Max. Lab Inplace Specified Soil Optimum Dry Density* Inplace Dry Relative Minimum ID and Moisture* (Std.Proc.) Moisture Density Compaction Compact. Test Date Type Classification (%) (pcf) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) Comments 80 10/4/95_ N P4: SP-SM 9 121% 7 121 100 95 A 81 10/4/95 N P4: SP-SM 9 121% 9 121 100 95 A 82 10/4/95 N P4: SP-SM 9 121% 10 122 100 95 A 83 10/4/95 N P4: SP-SM 9 1211 13 122 100 95 A 84 10/5/95 N P4: SP-SM 9 121% 9 121 100 95 A Key: N = Nuclear, ASTM D 2922 A = Test results comply with specifications. SC = Sand Cone, ASTM D 1556 B = Test results do not comply with specifications. * = O.M. and M.L.D.D. rounded to nearest 0.5 Test Test Location Elevation 80 30' from building, Grid 13 ramp 872% 81 30' from building, Grid 9 ramp 872% 82 25' from building, Grid 5 ramp 873 83 25' from building, Grid 1 ramp 873 84 25' from building, Grid 17 ramp 873 Elevation Reference: c: Building Inspections;City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group oseph M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\cts.17 BRAUN' INTERTEC Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil (Proctor) Date: June 30, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Field Data: Date Sampled : 6/10/95 Test Number P-1 Sampled By JMF Location Sampled Classification : SP-SM: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to medium-grained, brown. Laboratory Data: ASTM D: 698-91 Procedure: Standard A Date Tested: 6/12/95 As Received Water Content: — Prep. Method: wet Rammer Type:manual Sieve Data, % on 3/4": — % 3/4"-3/8": — % 3/8" -#4: — Size of "Oversize": — Percent Oversize:— Spec. Gravity: 2.45 Curve Values Corrected Values (ASTM D 4718) Maximum Dry Unit Weight, pcf 111 pcf — pcf Optimum Water Content, % 13 114 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■EMME■E■E10E■■■■INMM10M10MIN10MMM■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■MM■EE■EINM■M■M■11■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■E■■■■■■■■EMME11MM10M10MIN■IN■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■■■■■MEM■1\MINEMM1011■■■■IN■IN■■■ ■■10■MEM■MEEMININ■ME■MINE■■■■■■■■■■,�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■1111■M■■EM■■■■■MEM■■M10EM111ININ■■■1011■■■■■■■■ 112 ■■■■■■■EMMM■■■■INMM■■■ININ■■MINMM■10■■■■A■■EINMMM■M10■■ME■ ■■■M■■■IN■EM■■■■IN■INE■■■■IN■■■■■■■■INE■►�■EEE■■■■■IN■■■■ ■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■E■■E■MM■M■MMM■■I■IN■M■■■■■■E■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■MM11IN■MuMIME IN■A■■■uuaM■■■■■ ■■ININ■■■ININ■■■■■IN■IN■■■■■■E■M■■■■MINIM MMM10EM■■■■■■■ ■■10■■E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■■■■■■■■■MEMaEMe■■■■INME■■ Zero Air Voids ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r:.■IN■izima■■■■■\■■■■■■■■EE■■ ■■■unam■■■■■■■■■■o.■■■■■ mounaMEIN■■■►\■■■■■■■E■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■MEINE■■rmiso ■E wsulanamis■■:IN■■MEIN■■■■■ )a 110 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■1111■■■■■0■M■■■■M0M■■■1010■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■►AE■■■■■■■■■■■■■MM■I1■■■1111■a11ME■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►.■■IN■■MM■■■MIN■■■M■■ILINE■■■■IIIN■■■EMS.G.= 2.45 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■E■■■■■0■■■■■■►11■■■■a■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■Ma■■■E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■10■■■■■ izm (Assumed) ■■■■E■■■■■■■►A■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►i■■■■■■omnu ■ wi ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■M■M■■ ■■■M■■■■E■■E■■■mimmagr igis■ ■■■■■■■■■■■a■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■MM■■imum EM■■b:_z■■■■ ■11■INE■■■■■nimu ■■IN■■M■■E■■■■■INM■■M■■muEEM■■se■11■M■ 108 ■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■-■M11-■■■■►-■■M■■■a■■IN■■ ■■INE■EINE■ri10INININ■■E■■E10■E■■■ININININ■IN■EEININ�ININ■EE10��ININ■■ ■■■IN■M■■I■■■■IN■■■■■■■■■E■■M■■■■E■■M■11E►11■M■■■11MNIMI ■■IN■IN■■■r4■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■IN111■■■ ■EINE■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN1111EE■■■■■■■■■IN■■■■■E►1■IN■ ■E■■■■■riE■■■E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■EMM■E■■■■■■►�■EINE■IN■�E■ ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■■■■■MINE■■■■11IN��MIN■■■■M►iIN■ ■■■■■■Li■IN11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■M■■IN■■■■7■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MIN■■E■■■■EA■■M■■■■Y■ 1110■■■■■■IN■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■MIN■■■■■■11■1011■■■■■■ 106 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11IN■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■10■■■■■■■■■MINE■■M■E■E■■MMEININMM■ ■IN■■E■■■■■■■■■■E■IN■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■EMMM■■MINM■IN■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■MM■■■■■■INMEINE■ME1111M■■■IN■ ■EME■■EEE■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■■■■■■IN■MEE■■■■ININ■■■■■ININ■ININ■ ■IN■■■IN■■IN■MIN■■■E■11EIN■■■■EEIN■E■■ININ■■■IN■■M10■■■■MEIN■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■■IN■■■■■■INMEE■E■MEMM■E■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■MIN■■■■■■M■E■E■EE■IN■MMMM■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MM■--■■MMM■-■■-MIN■■■■MIN■■ ■■■■■■M■■IN■■E■■■E■■■■M■INEIN■INININ11■■■■ININ■■■■■■■■■MIN■■ 104 ■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■■■■E■■■■■■MINM■■INMMEE■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■ Water Content, % 8 10 12 14 16 18 95107c1p-1 B RAU NSM INTERTEC Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil (Proctor) Date: July 3, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Field Data: Date Sampled : 6/10/95 Test Number P-2 Sampled By IMF Location Sampled : Classification : SP-SM: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown. Laboratory Data: ASTM D: 698-91 Procedure: Standard C Date Tested: 6/12/95 As Received Water Content: — Prep. Method: wet Rammer Type:manual Sieve Data, % on 3/4": 5% % 3/4"-3/8": 12.8% % 3/8" -#4: — Size of"Oversize": — Percent Oversize: — Spec. Gravity: 2.60 Curve Values Corrected Values (ASTM D 4718) Maximum Dry Unit Weight, pcf 1261 pcf pcf Optimum Water Content, % 91 % % 127 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■is■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M/MEMM■M■MMEMMMMM■M■MM■E■EM■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■-OMMEMMEM■MMMMMM■M■EMMEMEMM ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■/.■MEMOMEEMMRM■■EM■MEMO■■OEMMEM■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■/A■■EM■a■MEMaM■■■M■■■MMM■MEM■MM■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■U■■EM■■LMM■■ MM■■M■EEEM■OM■MME■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■EMEME■■■■OMMEMMIIMME■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Wa■■■■■■■■Mv■MEMMEMEM■■■■EE■EM■■■M ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■UMMIIM■■■■■■MUMMKU■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I,■MM■■M■■■MEMMEMMAM■■E■■■■■NEEM■M■■ 125 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■WOMME■■■■■■■■MMEM MEMME■■M■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r,N■■■■M■■O■■NM■OMM■a■■■■■■■N■■■MMMM■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■WMMMM■■N■N■M■■UMMEM■■■■■■■■■NNN■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ITE■■■■■MMMEMMMMMU■MMSNNMMN■M■■■■MNNM■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■nNEM■NM■■■EE■MNONI■■■A■M■■MMMM■ENM■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■s■MN■■■M■■ON■MMMM■IIMN■I70M■OMNMMMNO■■■ Zero Air Voids ■■■■■■■■■■■■UMM■MM■■■■NM■E■MNNOW■■■,M■■■■■■■■■■MMM■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■''I■■MME■■■■■NM■MEM■■MMEMMMM■■MEM■NMN■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■MEMME■O■■EMO■MN■■■■MWO■■aN■■MMMMMM■MMM■ pgrab4Cime ■■■■■■■MEMMUMME■MMO■■EEMM■■NNNMEMEMMAM■MM■NMENEEN■ 123 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■summa■■■■■■■■■■■■■ •hismoommu mEmmoi nommumnimmom onmian mmommoiiim2-m ■■■■■■■■■■■EEM■M■■NO■■■■■■■■■■■■■►1■■■Ui■■■■■c�■iiii S.G.=2.60 ■■■■■■■■■vu■■■■EMNMM■■OMMM■NME■EMMN■■►IOM■MME►`AIE■■ (Assumed) ■MMMOME■■NM■E■■CMN■■■NM■MN■ME■■ME■UMMEWOMN■M■■/E■■ ■■■■■■■■■•■MMM■ON■■■MMEMMENM■■M■MOM■■■N.IM•.■_M:■OM■ ■■■■■■■■MEMME■UMMM■N■■■■■■M■NMM■■MUMMEMME:=NMMMMMN■ ■■■■■■■■rANMMMMME■N■M■■■■■MNMM■MMO■r■M■ORI■M■OE■NM■ 121 ■■■■■■■■IEMO■EOEEEE■■■MMM■■MEM■■NMMMU ME,IEMOMEEMO■ ■■■■■■■I,■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MMMEMW■■■■■■■■■ �. ■■■■■■■_■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■u■■■■_._■■■■■■■■ 111EMOMM■7MMOENO■■EMO■■EEEME■■NE■■■■■REE■NO►\■NNM■MM■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■■■E■■■■M■EMEMIM■MMrOMMEM■E■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MEM■■■■■■■ME■■EE■MEMMAINIM■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■OONMMM■■■■■E■■O■■■■■■■NONE■`■■■MEMO ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■NOME■■N■M■■EEO■MMEMMINMNM■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MOM■E■MEMMEEON■■■■■■■►\MNEME■ ■EOM■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■OMEE■■NEM■■NEEM■EMMMMMaNMMME■ ■OM■MOOO■MEMEME■■MM■■MEM■M■■MEM■EME■OEMMOMMA■EMO■ 119 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■MMMMMMMEMEMM■OMMMMM■N■■MMM■■ ■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MNE■M■O■■O■MOM■EMNOOEM■■EMNMN■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MEMO■OMMMM■MN■NEEM■■N■MM■E■ ■ENE■■NM■■M■MME■■■■■M■■■■■■■M■M■■O■M■N■■MNMN■M■■M■ ■EMEMM■NEMM■M■■■■■MMM■MN■■■M■MME■■■■MEE■■ME■■E■M■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■EM■■■■■M■■ME■■■N■■■■■E■■■MM■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■M■E■■M■M■■■■■M■■EE■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MMM■■■■M■MM■■■MME■■■■■■E■■■■■■ 117 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■E■MM■■M■■■■M■■E■■■■■E■■ Water Content, % 5 7 9 11 13 15 951O7c kp•2 • B RAU NSM INTERTEC Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil (Proctor) Date: June 30, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Field Data: Date Sampled : 6/15/95 Test Number P-3 Sampled By JMF Location Sampled : Classification SC: Clayey Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown. Laboratory Data: ASTM D: 698-91 Procedure: Standard B Date Tested: 6/15/95 As Received Water Content: — Prep. Method: wet Rammer Type:manual Sieve Data, % on 3/4": — % 3/4"-3/8": — % 3/8" -#4: — Size of "Oversize": - Percent Oversize: — Spec. Gravity: 2.70 Curve Values Corrected Values (ASTM D 4718) Maximum Dry Unit Weight, pcf 1231/2 pcf — pcf Optimum Water Content, % 12 °6 — 127 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ii■■■■■■■■■iii■■■i■■■••■■■i■1111■111111■■11111111■1111■ ■■■■iiia■■■■■i•i•■■■11■l■i■■■■■■■■■ii•i■l■■1111■1111■l■ ■■■■■■■■■•■11i■■■11■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■11■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■ ■■ililei•i■■■11■•■iii■■■•■■�■■■■•11i■■■■■•■1111/■■■■■■ ■i■iiiii■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11a■■■•■■■■•i•■■■■■■•■■■■ ■1111■■iiiii■■•■■••i■■■iiiii■\i■11■■•■■■■•■■■11■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■11•iii•a11■■■■■11■■■11■■■■■111111■■ ■■■1111•■■1111■■■■■■■■■■1111■11■■■■q■■11■■■■■■1111■■■■■11■1111■ 1 ■■■■■■■■■•■■■i■■■11■■■•■•■■■■■■■■■i■■■i■■■11■■■■■■■■ 2-5 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■A■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■••••••■■•■iii■■i■■■■i■■i1111■ir■i•■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 1111■iii■■■■■■■■■■■■■iii■■i■■■11■�■■l■11■1111■■■■■1111111111■ ■■•iiiii■i■■■•■■■■1111111111■■■■■■11V■■■■•■■11■■11l■■■■■■i ■•11■1111•■■■■■■•■11■■■■■••1111■■•■■■a■iii•■■■■■■■■•i■■■ ■i■■■■■■•■■■■•■■■■•i■l■■•1111/■■■a•i■i■■■■■■•■■i11■11■ Zero Air Voids 1111■•iii■■■■■■••■■■■■■■■i■■■1111•■■■■l■111111■■■11111111•■■■ ■■■■■••■■■■■111111.1111■au••• ��u■■■■►�■•■•■■■■■■■■■■■•■ ■■■•■■•i•■■■■•iiiii•■■■A■•■■a■■■■A■■■■■■■ii■•■11i■■ 123 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■l■■■■■■mm■■■■■s■mm■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■i■■■■i•i■i■■■••iilfrill■■•i•m■■11■mi••■■■■■■■■•••■ /iiiiiii■■■•■■■••mnii•ii■i■ounsimemin11 msmr. S.G.= 2.70 s ■1111iii•■■■■■•i■■■m•■•■••■■ inemmiossa ■•■eaimins ■i••••iiia■■■•■liil�■••iiiii■■■aiii►�iii•■.11■i•i•i■ (Assumed) 1-3 ■/11/11iii••■■ummrA•■■■■iii••■■��■■i••■■■■aiimmu ■■ ■il■■•■■■■■■■■■■■r■■■■•■•■■■•■■■i••i►1••■■•••m■••■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■i•■■•■■■■■i■■■■►n■■•riul■•mm.••••■ 1111iii■••••■•■i•■ru•■■■■isii■i•■ ma■■■inezi ■■i••■■■ 121 ■i■■■■■■■■■■l■■iimmum ■■iiiii•■■i•►�■ii v-:ia■l■■■•i■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ unimiri■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■iamor ■■■■■■■■■■■ Q ■■■i■■■•••■■■■'i•■■■■■i••■ll•■■■■••l1i•■111■■l••■■••i■ ■iiiiiii•■■■■E,■■••■i■••i■■i•■i■•■■11•■•■0■■■■■■iii■ ■i■■■••iii■i■'A■■■■■•••■■■iii•■■■■•■,w•■■L■■■ii••i■■ ■■•■■■■■■■■■ ,•■■■■■■■l■••i•i•i■■i••►ri■il,�■••••••■■ ■••■•ii•■■■r/■i■iii■■■•■■■■■■■■i■■■r■i•■r■•■■■■■■■ ■iiiii■i■■■�•i■iiiii■iii•■■■•■■■i•■iai•■■a■■•■■•i■ 1111■iii■iii■U■i■■■iii■■■i•■■iii■i•iii►�i■■■►iii■■•■■■ 1111■■i■■■■IMiii■■iii■■iiiiiii■■••ii■n■i■■•a••l■•■■ 119 ■■■■■■■■■■ri■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■n■■■■■m■■■■■■■ ■■■•■i•■••■■•■■•■■■••■■•■illi■■■■•iiia■■■■11■■■■1111■ ■i�l■■■i•n•i•■ii■iiiiiii■ii■■i■■i■■i•►tii■■•►�■ii■■■ 11111iii■i••■•l■ii•■■■■ilii•■•■■i■■••■ilU••■■■C■ii■■■ ■ilii•■■■■■■i■••■■i■1111■i■■■■ii■■•iii■&■■■l•■,�■•ii■ ■/ilii■iii■■l•■■■■■■■11ii•11■■■■■11ii■■iii■■■•iYii■■■ ■■■■iii■1111■i■■■■■■•■■11■■■■■■■i■■11i■11■1111■■■1111•■■■■■ ■■■■■■i11•■■■■■■••i11i■■■■■i■■■■■■11■■■■1111■■■11■■■•■11■ 1111■■■iii■1111■■•■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■ 117 ■1111111111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11ii■i■■l■■i•■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■11■ Water Content, % 7 9 11 13 15 17 95107c\p-3 BRAUN' INTERTEC Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil (Proctor) Date: October 9, 1995 Project: BODX-95-107C Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota Field Data: Date Sampled : 10/5/95 Test Number P-4 Sampled By TDN Location Sampled : Classification : SP-SM: Poorly Graded Sand with Silt Laboratory Data: ASTM D: 698-91 Procedure: Standard C Date Tested: 10/5/95 As Received Water Content: — Prep. Method: wet Rammer Type:manual Sieve Data, % on 3/4": — % 3/4"-3/8": — % 3/8" -#4: — Size of"Oversize": — Percent Oversize: — Spec. Gravity: 2.50 Curve Values Corrected Values (ASTM D 4718) Maximum Dry Unit Weight, pcf 1211/2 pcf — pcf Optimum Water Content, % 9 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►I■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■1111■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MINIM■■■■11■■■1111■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■tea■■11.11■■■■■■■11■■11■■s 122 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■110■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IM■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■/9i/■■1107■■■■■■■■:11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�%■■■■1111■■\�■■■■■■l�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■■■■kall■■■■11II■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■ Zero Air Voids ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►■11■13■■■■■■11■■11■■■■■ )curce 120 ■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►.■■►�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■n■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■a■o■■■■■■■■■■es_ S.G.= 2.50 'Q (Assumed) ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►■►1►.Z.11■■■■■■ ■■■n■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■a1iall■■■■■■■■ ■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►!■■■■■■■■■■ ■■r■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■►�►■■■■■■■■■■ 118 ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■,�■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■5r■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■11■■■■■ 116 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■►I■IN■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■M■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■111111111111■■■■11■■■■■1111■■■■■11111111■■ 114 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Water Content, % 5 7 9 11 13 15 95107ckp-4 B RAU N5M INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" x 12" Cylinder Date: September 6, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 1 Mix Design: 3000 Date Cast: 8/7/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 3:00 p.m. Specified Air: not given Measured Slump: 2" Specified Strength: 3000 Measured Air: 2.4% Truck or Ticket No.: 96 Concrete Temperature: 81° F Cylinders Per Set: 3 Air Temperature: 85° F Cylinder Cast By: MCS Liquid Added at Site: none Sample Location: West building footing Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) lA 8/8 8/14 1 6 7 81720 28.30 2890 B 1B 8/8 9/5 1 28 29 117660 28.43 4140 K 1C 8/8 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 3000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. K: The above 29-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation J s M. Fri 'chs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.l BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6"a 12" Cylinder Date: September 7, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 HIghway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 2 Mix Design: 3000 Date Cast: 8/9/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 2:00 p.m. Specified Air: not given Measured Slump: 21" Specified Strength: 3000 Measured Air: 1.8% Truck or Ticket No.: 251 Concrete Temperature: 79° F Cylinders Per Set: 3 Air Temperature: 83° F Cylinder Cast By: MCS Liquid Added at Site: none Sample Location: Footing: north side of building Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 2A 8/10 8/16 1 6 7 86600 28.31 3060 F 2B 8/10 9/6 1 27 28 126460 28.43 4450 K 2C 8/10 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 3000 Remarks: F: The specified 28-day strength was met at the 7-day age according to the above test results. K: The above 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Jos h M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.2 BRAUN INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6 a 12".Cylinder Date: September 7, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 HIghway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 3 Mix Design: 3000 Date Cast: 8/9/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 2:30 p.m. Specified Air: not given Measured Slump: 2" Specified Strength: 3000 Measured Air: 2.4% Truck or Ticket No.: 96 Concrete Temperature: 75° F Cylinders Per Set: 3 Air Temperature: 84° F Cylinder Cast By: MCS Liquid Added at Site: none Sample Location: Footing: east side of building Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 3A 8/10 8/16 1 6 7 86950 28.31 3070 F 3B 8/10 9/6 1 27 28 122620 28.43 4310 K 3C 8/10 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 3000 Remarks: F: The specified 28-day strength was met at the 7-day age according to the above test results. K: The above 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation • � �jj Jds M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.3 BRAU NTM INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6"x 12" Cylinder Date: September 8, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 4 Mix Design: not given Date Cast: 8/10/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: not given Specified Air: not given Measured Slump: not given Specified Strength: 3000 Measured Air: not given Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 3 Air Temperature: not given Cylinder Cast By: contractor Liquid Added at Site: not given Sample Location: Footing: south side of building Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 4A 8/11 8/17 1 6 7 76490 28.33 3050 F 4B 8/11 9/7 1 27 28 129340 28.49 4540 K 4C 8/11 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 3000 Remarks: F: The specified 28-day strength was met at the 7-day age according to the above test results. K: The above 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Josey a M. Fri 'chs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.4 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: September 13, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 5 Mix Design: 3000 Date Cast: 8/15/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 2:45 p.m. Specified Air: not given Measured Slump: 21/2" Specified Strength: 3000 Measured Air: not given Truck or Ticket No.: 98 Concrete Temperature: 81° F Cylinders Per Set: 3 Air Temperature: 84° F Cylinder Cast By: DWJ Liquid Added at Site: none Sample Location: Column Pad: Grid Lines D12 and C12 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 5A 8/16 8/22 1 6 7 100850 28.32 3560 F 5B 8/16 9/12 1 27 28 122830 28.41 4320 L 5C 8/16 9/12 1 27 28 136130 28.41 4790 L Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 3000 Remarks: F: The specified 28-day strength was met at the 7-day age according to the above test results. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation \tei\A- C Josep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.5 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: September 14, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 6 Mix Design: 3000 Date Cast: 8/16/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 3:15 p.m. Specified Air: not given Measured Slump: 21/4" Specified Strength: 3000 Measured Air: not given Truck or Ticket No.: 92 Concrete Temperature: 82° F Cylinders Per Set: 3 Air Temperature: 84° F Cylinder Cast By: DWJ Liquid Added at Site: none Sample Location: Column Pad: Grid Line C16 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 6A 8/17 8/23 1 6 7 111580 28.35 3940 F 6B 8/17 9/13 1 27 28 143000 28.43 5030 L 6C 8/17 9/13 1 27 28 133450 28.43 4690 L Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 3000 Remarks: F: The specified 28-day strength was met at the 7-day age according to the above test results. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation ( 14.(40-4L .Xe Josep M.4 . riederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.6 • BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: September 15, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 HIghway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 7 Mix Design: 3000 Date Cast: 8/17/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 2:45 p.m. Specified Air: not given Measured Slump: 31/2" Specified Strength: 3000 Measured Air: not given Truck or Ticket No.: 74 Concrete Temperature: 81° F Cylinders Per Set: 3 Air Temperature: 88° F Cylinder Cast By: DWJ Liquid Added at Site: none Sample Location: Column Pad: Grid Lines C-9 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 7A 8/18 8/24 1 6 7 77760 28.31 2750 B 7B 8/18 9/14 1 27 28 89360 28.35 3150 L 7C 8/18 9/14 1 27 28 101510 28.35 3580 L Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 3000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation i til ,7L J . •1 M. F i ederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c1conc.7 BRAUNSM INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: October 6, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 8 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/7/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 3:00 p.m. Specified Air: not given Measured Slump: not given Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: not given Truck or Ticket No.: 86 Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 3 Air Temperature: not given Cylinder Cast By: client Liquid Added at Site: not given Sample Location: Loading Dock Walls: Grid E, 17 to 14 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 8A 9/8 9/14 1 6 7 127870 28.35 4510 F 8B 9/8 10/5 1 27 28 170740 28.41 6010 K 8C 9/8 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: F: The specified 28-day strength was met at the 7-day age according to the above test results. K: The above 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation \.' 1 J.' •h M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.8 B RAV NSM INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: October 17, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 HIghway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 9 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/19/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 7:30 a.m. Specified Air: 21/2% Measured Slump: 31" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 1.9% Truck or Ticket No.: 161 Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 54°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid A-B, 1-2 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 9A 9/20 9/26 1 6 7 99899 28.37 3520 9B 9/20 10/17 1 27 28 158730 28.36 5600 L 9C 9/20 10/17 1 27 28 155410 28.36 5480 L Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group Braun Intertec Corporation -r h M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.9 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6"a 12" Cylinder Date: October 17, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rodion Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 HIghway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 10 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/19/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 8:00 a.m. Specified Air: 21/2% Measured Slump: 4" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 2.2% Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 56°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid D-E, 2-3 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 10A 9/20 9/26 1 6 7 99754 28.37 3520 B 10B 9/20 10/17 1 27 28 140880 28.36 4970 L 10C 9/20 10/17 1 27 28 136270 28.36 4800 L Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group )110104.‘ ti., oseph M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.10 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6"a 12" Cylinder Date: October 17, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff W`llman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 11 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/19/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 11:00 a.m. Specified Air: 21/2% Measured Slump: 41" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 2.5% Truck or Ticket No.: 159 Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 51°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid D-E, 4-3 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 11A 9/20 9/26 1 6 7 87469 28.37 3080 B 11B 9/20 10/17 1 27 28 130020 28.36 4580 L 11C 9/20 10/17 1 27 28 146010 28.36 5150 L Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group _ a� ♦ , J.seph . Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107ckronc.11 B RAU NSM INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6"x 12" Cylinder Date: October 17, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 12 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/19/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 11:45 a.m. Specified Air: 21/2% Measured Slump: 5" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 3.2% Truck or Ticket No.: 106 Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 52°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid B-C, 3-4 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 12A 9/20 9/26 1 6 7 93840 28.37 3310 B 12B 9/20 10/17 1 27 28 145150 28.36 5120 L 12C 9/20 10/17 1 27 28 144010 28.36 5080 L Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group •s-.1 M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.12 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: October 19, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 HIghway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 13 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/20/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 7:15 a.m. Specified Air: 21/% Measured Slump: 5" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 2.9% Truck or Ticket No.: 151 Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 42°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid C-D, 6-7 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 13A 9/22 9/27 2 5 7 90330 28.43 3180 B 13B 9/22 10/18 2 26 28 143990 28.32 5080 L 13C 9/22 10/18 2 26 28 135050 28.32 4770 L 13D 9/22 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group ike-C,Gezt Joseph . Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.13 S BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: October 19, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 14 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/20/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 8:00 a.m. Specified Air: 21/2% Measured Slump: 4" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 3.2% Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 48°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid C-D, 5-6 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 14A 9/22 9/27 2 5 7 95870 28.43 3370 B 14B 9/22 10/18 2 26 28 144720 28.32 5110 L 14C 9/22 10/18 2 26 28 132290 28.32 4670 L 14D 9/22 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group 144 I, .‘"..Ace./44...taid osep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.14 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: October 19, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 15 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/20/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 1:00 p.m. Specified Air: 21/2% Measured Slump: 5" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 2.5% Truck or Ticket No.: 153 Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 52°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid A-B, 8-9 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 15A 9/22 9/27 2 5 7 95210 28.43 3350 B 15B 9/22 10/18 2 26 28 138720 28.32 4900 L 15C 9/22 10/18 2 26 28 146520 28.32 5170 L 15D 9/22 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group •s M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.15 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: October 19, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota • FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 16 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/20/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 1:30 p.m. Specified Air: 21/2% Measured Slump: 41/2" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 3.0% Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 55°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid B-C, 8-9 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 16A 9/22 9/27 2 5 7 97200 28.43 3420 B 16B 9/22 10/18 2 26 28 132350 28.32 4670 L 16C 9/22 10/18 2 26 28 149410 28.32 5280 L 16D 9/22 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group \,ittirA Josep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.16 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: October 19, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 17 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/21/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 7:15 a.m. Specified Air: 2.5% Measured Slump: 5" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 3.0% Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 42°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid A-B, 9-10 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 17A 9/22 9/28 1 6 7 107820 28.36 3800 B 17B 9/22 10/19 1 27 28 142250 28.26 5030 L 17C 9/22 10/19 1 27 28 144180 28.26 5100 L 17D 9/22 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group n. /(:44-47-."—,---4( r V� os h M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.17 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: October 19, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 18 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/21/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 8:00 a.m. Specified Air: 2.5% Measured Slump: 5" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 2.8% Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 47°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid B-C, 10-11 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 18A 9/22 9/28 1 6 7 104190 28.36 3670 B 18B 9/22 10/19 1 27 28 148120 28.26 5240 L 18C 9/22 10/19 1 27 28 151190 28.26 5350 L 18D 9/22 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group /7 r A.,4ifdczle,4_,A J sep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.18 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6"x 12" Cylinder Date: October 19, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 19 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/21/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 12:00 p.m. Specified Air: 2.5% Measured Slump: 41/4" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 3.2% Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 38°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid A-B, 12-13 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 19A 9/22 9/28 1 6 7 102120 28.36 3600 B 19B 9/22 10/19 1 27 28 136630 28.26 4830 L 19C 9/22 10/19 1 27 28 153810 28.26 5440 L 19D 9/22 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group sep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c1conc.19 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6"a 12" Cylinder Date: October 19, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 HIghway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 20 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/21/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 1:00 p.m. Specified Air: 2.5% Measured Slump: 41" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 3.0% Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: not given Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 48°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-grade: Grid A-B, 13-14 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 20A 9/22 9/28 1 6 7 120690 28.36 4260 F 20B 9/22 10/19 1 27 28 155450 28.26 5500 L 20C 9/22 10/19 1 27 28 160930 28.26 5690 L 20D 9/22 HOLD Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: F: The specified 28-day strength was met at the 7-day age according to the above test results. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group sep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.20 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" x 12" Cylinder Date: October 23, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 21 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/25/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast 9:00 a-m. Specified Air: 2.5% Measured Slump: 3" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 2.9% Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: 55°F Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 42°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-Grade: Grid 14-15, A-B Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 21A 9/26 10/2 1 6 7 85420 28.37 3010 B 21B 9/26 10/23 1 27 28 138660 28.38 4890 L 21C 9/26 10/23 1 27 28 135110 28.38 4760 L Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group 7 sep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.21 • BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6"a 12" Cylinder Date: October 23, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 22 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/25/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 9:30 a.m. Specified Air: 2.5% Measured Slump: 3 1/2" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 2.4% Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: 57°F Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 45°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-Grade: Grid 15-16, B-C Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 22A 9/26 10/2 1 6 7 94525 28.37 3330 B 22B 9/26 10/23 1 27 28 142020 28.38 5000 L 22C 9/26 10/23 1 27 28 139840 28.38 4930 K Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. L: The average 28-day test result meets the required design strength. K: The above 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group ‘16-4M.�'AL•ie1��. e sep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.22 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" x 12" Cylinder Date: October 24, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 23 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/26/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 7:30 a.m. Specified Air: 2-5% Measured Slump: 5" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 2.8% Truck or Ticket No.: 151 Concrete Temperature: 61°F Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 48°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-Grade: Building 2, Grid D-C, 1-2 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 23A 9/27 10/3 1 6 7 86690 28.37 3060 B 23B 9/27 10/24 1 27 28 131560 28.29 4650 K 23C 9/27 10/24 1 27 28 128450 28.29 4540 K Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. K: The above 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections;City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group \rya osep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.23 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6" a 12" Cylinder Date: October 24, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 24 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/26/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 7:00 a.m. Specified Air: 2-5% Measured Slump: 4 1/2" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 2.9% Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: 64°F Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 51°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-Grade: Building 2, Grid B-C, 2-3 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 24A 9/27 10/3 1 6 7 96662 28.37 3410 B 24B 9/27 10/24 1 27 28 144010 28.29 3090 K 24C 9/27 10/24 1 27 28 131270 28.29 4640 K Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. K: The above 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig;McSherry Group os h M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c1conc.24 BRAUN' INTERTEC Compressive Test of Concrete Cylinder Test Method: ASTM C 39, 6"a 12" Cylinder Date: October 24, 1995 Project Number: BODX-95-107C Project Client: Description: Mr. Jeff Wellman Construction Testing Services Rochon Corporation Interstate Crossing 12866 Highway 55 Lone Oak Road and Lone Oak Circle Plymouth, MN 55441 Eagan, Minnesota FIELD DATA: DESIGN DATA: Set Number: 25 Mix Design: 4000 Date Cast: 9/26/95 Supplier: AVR Time Cast: 12:30 p.m. Specified Air: 2-5% Measured Slump: 2" Specified Strength: 4000 Measured Air: 2.4% Truck or Ticket No.: not given Concrete Temperature: 71°F Cylinders Per Set: 4 Air Temperature: 67°F Cylinder Cast By: TDN Liquid Added at Site: None Sample Location: Slab-on-Grade: Grid D-C, 4-5 Field Notes: Sample Date Test Field Lab Test Max Load Cyl Area Compressive Remarks No. Recvd Date Cure Cure Age (pounds) (sq in) Strength, psi Code(s) 25A 9/27 10/3 1 6 7 89212 28.37 3140 B 25B 9/27 10/24 1 27 28 113130 28.29 4000 K 25C 9/27 10/24 1 27 28 149400 28.29 5280 K Specified Strength at 28 Days (psi): 4000 Remarks: B: The 7-day test result projects that the specified strength will likely be met at the 28-day age according to a typical strength age relationship. K: The above 28-day test result meets the required design strength. c: Building Inspections; City of Eagan Braun Intertec Corporation Mr. Dennis Ludwig; McSherry Group rn T osep M. Friederichs Engineering Assistant 95107c\conc.25 • B R A U N SM Special Inspector Daily Report Page 1 of INTERTEC City of ) Report Number: I Date of This Report: 8-i 4-55 Project Name: ...r+lmesrr}ra.- CasstJo Project No.: ..g:o)c 95.204, L Project Address: 10 /cj, . k,( Client: -7-4-irk-----'267v4re 6/..css,Ji. Client Project No.: Weather: 62/p4ir Temperature: 78° Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ❑ Continuous 0 Masonry ! Rebar Placement 21 Foundations ❑ Periodic 0 Welding k Il Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing 0 Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No Description and location of work completed: Q15ert/2d '/ 3-Or '41s c("1Z(Q5 , g-2 i 13- 3� s- 4 � 3-� � C - 2j C-3 C-4) C - 5 r D-2 . 7X 7X/�-1 " w//D- '�5, Li-t wgj AZM/ti,,, W2 r Oh cl /Lmo v415.5 44s/t/r --1:)//s prier 4, pout-J .-, . List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0 No t; • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 No ki • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicae - workmanship pr• sions of the UBC, except as noted above. Sig ed: i. . /�...,1 c ,r+t--- Date: g-/4-?‘ Print if ame: -.11Srwt 1A NR�.L, SAS lE o I.D. Number: (47Z/ (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Irm\speeinsp.4 1/25/95 B RAV N"M Special Inspector Daily Report Page ) of g• INTERTEC City of EA6Ai1 Report Number: Z Date of This Report: $ - 1 -SIS Project Name: INTER 5r14-TE cRet5/N6 Project No.: gp - 20oc Project Address: LoivG• oAK RD + Lome o4-if LiRG�E Client: Roc-1-f oN Go R P Client Project No.: Weather: PARTLY C.L.OUby Temperature: g�o Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: 0 Continuous 0 Masonry ® Rebar Placement 0 Foundations CO Periodic 0 Welding E Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing 0 Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No E Description and location of work completed: 5 ET V P A N b Pa OR TYPE P-, C.p L UM N Ph05 Ar GRID L,Nes Da, 03 , DLt', Dr, ►a, , D ? ca . C31✓134h, c-3-, G4. , 67, 8a, 83, `t, SC, 8 ( , 6 7, s E t. A rn -c- F D S k1:.rc/-/• List tests performed: C.tlac4 6 Soil- 5 a 8& AA-OE , REBftA T i PE., D114 aN5,ON5, 121,_&..e146,0- CLeffkAA/C,r adiT5, rta5 , comGRE.TE rESr/NG wF5 M155ED , cNEGkeb FoR,i5 • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0 No ❑ • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 No El • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: odu 1W Date: $ !� -‘15- Print L5Print Full Name: DAV lb W. JO 3 TE 5 I.D. Number: 7909' (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) 1'nn\spccinsp.4 1/25/95 Piic BRAY NSM Description: INrE1t5r*TT C.R699/NC& (wESr 8144) LoWE &*h R 0. f- l.ONe? ettitRLI-�, tAlwAil NT E RT E C ;490 c- Dat:eNo: Bo DS -15� OvidY a 3 't 5 G 7 S 7 10 /1 /2 13 If /s4. i� E D El 0 0 0 0 0000 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ n o ❑ 0 0 ❑ 8 p ❑ p ❑ p Q p fa ❑ 0 0 0 0 C 0 F1 Ft RE= Fy =(6' WO PSX ASTt1419 F 1 (lO #5-Eft way (BoT) Foorbv& stytgAv. 5ttaa r .5/ DATED ifbit F - (I #. 7 N *5 Cgor) ( 't) 7 E fw C8or, «V r45/if-Er 52 DA-rzb S-/ii/qj' 10 I*6-- N1-5 Crop 7.4 45 *-w ToP DETAIL, 5110E7 55 t"E}TEU 412-M S AA,c,E GEivE R S Ti u Tu.A-t, n'ore5 DSD 417115- e EnItTIA La t FORMS BY frieste.Aw GReuP, /,vc. 5671L- KareAarvtE-.3 j l,,.ew t1414•E BMA;tiYo PlkEtopAe 20a0 PSt= f).P.�., tJ BL �ti� Fes, Fo&T1av - 3coo P5Z B R A U Ns" Special Inspector Daily Report Page / of INTERTEC City of FA6*iV Report Number: 7f3 Date of This Report: g-15--95- Project /S-9SProject Name: NTEA5r 1-r r.R055/,v Project No.: BobX - 2,00c. Project Address: Lo,vp o.4k + LpwE ohir c.lokeiterivro Client: R oc.4 oat/ cok P Client Project No.: Weather: PARTLY (Lov P y Temperature: $if° Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: El Continuous 0 Masonry Rebar Placement 0 Foundations ❑ Periodic 0 Welding Et Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing 0 Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No Description and location of work completed: SET u P f Pov l r Yp.E F-) (-41-0411/ P 405 Rr GRID t-i►vES DS, L`8, Bg, lo ,Gin, 8io , DIl , C.llIBM/ Dia , -; tala SEE 5 k arc-H A-rr f}c-h r0 REtoe R T # / List tests performed: c1-15:4-ft E. Sots- 5tiSGRPbE r RE19;R 1YPE, O'MEevSIDA/e. PI.AGMENI: C.LFA-RAMY-8 j1306-1-5 T,ES, Fel-5 . CHEe-kr_D t' - T M+X , 5t..vMP TEMP, MADE 3 GYV hvOERS FDR Sr(EMorhi DETERMiNATiOA/ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0 No e; • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 No ►� • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: t �"jtV Date: ? "l5 -yam Print Full Name: DtvjQ W J 05 TES I.D. Number: 79asf 3 (Whire copy to Braun Inrertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Irm\specinsp.4 1/25/95 BRAUNSM Special Inspector Daily Report Page I of INTERTEC City of EM AAJ Report Number: 73 Date of This Report: $ —/Co Project Name: i NTER 5 TATE c.Ro55/NCS Project No.: g o0 X`�',5^ X'C c_ Project Address: La Ala C 4)< RD LoNa OAK L t Ru-E Client: Rom 49 iv CORP Client Project No.: Weather: PARTLY SuMNy Temperature: g c Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ® Continuous 0 Masonry A Rebar Placement 0 Foundations 0 Periodic 0 Welding El Concrete Placement ❑ Fireproofing ❑ Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No gr Description and location of work completed: 5 ET LIP ANA Pov R t r PE n-' L p�_yM,✓ Pfrt / r GR iD ./NES 13 13 c. /3 � D i3 y 6 P+ , G Pi, 0Iit, B 15, G /`tl 0 ►tt 9/5 ;i D 15 i3 )(.1 G. 1(o rp!co 56E 5IrErt-eft A774G4ED ?0 REPO # RT I List tests performed: GttEc-h"ED 50!L &'B& MOE Re.B RR '1 YPa/ pi NE. ,s/ON5 GLEAlRf}N�E� 5o1-TS, FORMS . GltEGhab c.oNc-RErE. M r&, 52-v144P. TEMP t1AOE 34-Y`/NDFR`, FoR STRE.N6'r& De A,'1u v -rJDA/ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ® No 121 • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes ❑ No • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship� � provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: to i� 'YV 11. Date: w —y5 Print Full Name: Df}V 113 NV, Jo5TE-5 I.D. Number: 7/0113 (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) nn\spec insp.4 1/25/95 • B R A U N S~ Special Inspector Daily Report Page 1 of INTERTEC City of R(.4N Report Number: Date of This Report: $ —) 7-1.5' Project Name: tr./TEA STil-TF U p 0551 Neo Project No.: 13 0 b . 5 200 c, Project Address: Lo n,6 o#K RD + LONE OAK GRo55ity� Client: RoGffp A/ Go RP Client Project No.: Weather: SUNNY Temperature: $So Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: ® Continuous ❑ Masonry ® Rebar Placement 0 Foundations ❑ Periodic ❑ Welding ® Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing 0 Bolting 0 Tendon Placement ❑ Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No EI Description and location of work completed: SEr v P ANO Po,R F- LQ L tiM Al pAO 1}7 6121O LI NF 5 n q , c.. q , prNO B d' cEF_ SKS TLS gTTPt ME.D tO REPORT # ) List tests performed: GI4F_GffF 6 5dJL 5v8t. Rf}D. j REBAA TYPE DrMe.Nslem5,Pthceoisti - GL>rA�l�f}11 E� BOLD5 T1ES } FOR M5 , G EGhED Lo/Vok T . M►X , 51-vMP tr.M P1 pi/1.0E 3 cyt-, f, FOR 5r RE 4'&r8 verERM,Ai*r-io't/ • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes ❑ No Et • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 No 21 • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship� provisions of the UBC, except as noted above. Signed: ZaAm it ' Date: 9— 17 Print Full Name: PAin w J05Ta5 I.D. Number: 79°413 (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Inn n\spc insp.4 1/25/95 v • B RAV NSM Special Inspector Daily Report Page j of INTERTEC Cityof Report Number: b Date of This Report: q-7-'„S Project Name: :, m- Cie.as.e.c/j Project No.: max CIS--Z c. Project Address: 2.45,</e- co,C ofec4.. ai, G64/� O*-4 6 Client: Acwod Qep• Client Project No.: Weather: 43° 4:, PC, Temperature: 63 ° Type of Inspection: Inspection Coverage: 0 Continuous 0 Masonry A Rebar Placement 0 Foundations ❑ Periodic 0 Welding 0 Concrete Placement 0 Fireproofing 0 Bolting 0 Tendon Placement 0 Other Did the architect or engineer authorize changes to city approved plans? Yes 0 (Listed Below) No 0 Description and location of work completed: L04D,d6 j/ ..5 — 4h0A/6 -z°tb E - /7 lv /4 �►z 4F, . Toe-sLA( z^cove,e. 4S O /Z o G C.F. Verer Anel a De—r74-i L S I - ,A-un-P --7-4-to t mac, ki .L. (3" Co ) ® i g`` oc e,vi. o v-s( Frr•Ce > -�,-t L 7 Za C- A/41//c r2' 7'7,tei m,,; vic 1-ec✓/ '�� 444'd•-. Cees 71• List tests performed: • Are there any discrepancies noted from this day's observations? Yes 0 No Lam' • Are there any outstanding discrepancies on this project? Yes 0 No ❑----- • If yes, see attached Summary Sheet. To the best of our knowledge, work inspected was done in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable workmanship provis'e s of the UBC, except as noted above. Si f1-re- Date: Y T--7 Pri ame: UE L C 4jO GZ S n t. of I.D. Number: 69z-/ PIF (White copy to Braun Intertec file. Blue copy to General Contractor.) Inn\speeinsp.4 1/25/95