More
Help
About
Sign Out
No preview available
/
Fit window
Fit width
Fit height
400%
200%
100%
75%
50%
25%
View plain text
This document contains no pages.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
01/19/1982 - City Council Regular
AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL JANUARYI9, 1982 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:33 - ADOPT AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:35 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS Q'I A. Fire Department Q•1 B. Police Department �•` C. Park Department Q•'L D. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT ITEMS [One (1:) Motion Approves All Items] A. Agreement for Implementation of 911 Emergency Number Service V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS p.q A. Project 350 - Proposed Sanitary Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer & Street Improvements to Oster Addition & Lots 2-4, Treffle Acres p 3b B. Project 352 - Proposed Water Improvements to Shorland Road & Norvin Oaks IV. OLD BUSINESS I _ Dt(o A. Midwestern Association, Orrin Aune, For Preliminary Plat Approval Q Lone Oak -Heights & Variance to Exceed the Lot Coverage in Part of the NE'y of the NEk of Section 9 6 O B. Amcon Corporation (Patrick M. Gannon) for Rezoning from A Q (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development District) to allow 2 Office Buildings & Hotel Complex; for the Preliminary Plat of Ravine Plaza; and for a Variance to Exceed the Height Limitation in a Commercial District; Located in Part of the NE'y of the NE'k of Section 4 (South of Proposed I-494 Right -of -Way & West of Pilot Knob Road) 60 C. Burnet Realty (Leonard MacKinnon) for a Conditional Use Permit e for a Pylon Business Sign on Property Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedarview Addition, 4655 Nicols Road Q 6 D. Gravel Pit License Annual Renewal - Arnold Leitner VII. ORGANIZATIONAL (1982) Q• 6S A. Acting Mayor 6% F. Q (oj e' B. C. Legal Newspaper City Depositories 06 G. Q bb Q D. Official Posting (.$H. V-10 6G i Places 67 E. Advisory Planning Commissionf?740J. & Advisory Park & Recreation Committee Appointments Health Officer City Council Meetings Committee Appointments (Council) Fiscal Consultant Legal Consultant Eagan City Council Agenda January 19, 1982 Page Two VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Richard Nordlund for a Preliminary Plat for a Day Care Center (Kinder Care) and for a Conditional Use Permit for a Day Care Center in a Portion of Pilot Knob Heights in Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Pilot Knob Heights lst Addition, NWk of the SWk of Section 15 n �Op B. Richard Norlund for the Scheduling of a Public Hearing to Consider Industrial Revenue Bond Financing in the Amount of $325,000 for "Kinder Care" p gyp% C. Edmund B. Dunn of Blackhawk Park Associates for Rezoning from A ` (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development District) to Include Limited Business and Townhouse and Condominium Development and for. Preliminary Plat Approval of Knob Hill of Eagan, Consisting of Approximately 40 Acres Located in Part of the SE'y of the SE'k of Section 21 D. Kathleen M. Schwanz for a Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Q' Beauty Shop in a Residential Area Located on Lot 5, Block 3, Saddlehor.n Addition in Section 25, 4283 Stirrup St. Q\3 E. Wesley Medin for Waiver of Plat in Order to Split a 2.3 Acre Parcel into 2 Single Family Lots Located in Part of the NE'k of the SW'y of Section 34 �•�3� F. Amusement Device Application - Coachman Oaks Apartments p \540 C. Project 353, Receive/Approve Feasibility Report (T.H. 55 Utility \� Revisions & Signals) IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS tA52. A. Public Works Supervisory Salary Schedule/1982 X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 15, 1982 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION Girl Scout Troop #191, Donelle Hallman, Girl Scout Troop Leader, has asked for time on the City Council agenda to present Girl Scout Cookies to the Mayor and City Council. Girl Scouts will be present at 6:30 p.m. AGENDA I &` MINUTESF. After approval of the January 5, 1982 regular City Council minutes, special minutes of the January 12, 1982 special Council meeting and adoption of the January 19, 1982 City Council agenda, the fol- lowing items are in order for consideration: D,EPA'RTMENTr , HE'AD'1" BUSITNES FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Fire Department at this time. POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Police Department at this time. PARK DEPARTMENT C. Park Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Park Department at this time. Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Two L PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D. Public Works Department -- Item #1: Safari Estates 4.0 MG Water Reservoir - Sieg Site -- _'fie Public Works epartment as been continuing with its negotiation for acquisition of a site to construct a proposed 4.0 MG water reservoir for our high pressure zone which will be needed in 1982/83. After unsuccessful attempts to acquire sites in the Dakota County park reserve and Apple Valley, the Public Works Department is now pursuing the third alternative of a location just west of Safari Estates adjacent to the City's south boundary with Apple Valley located within the Sieg property. Recently, the City's consulting engineer and Public Works Director met with the realtor representing the Siegs' interest to discuss possible acquisition. The realtor has recommended that the City prepare a formal purchase agreement so that he may present this to the Siegs for formal consideration. Enclosed on page � is a proposed site plan for the location of this reservoir anc"its necessary access drive. It requires a total of 1.92 acres of permanent acquisition and 0.6 acres of temporary construction easements for slope construction. The staff would like to receive concurrence of an amount to offer the Siegs in this purchase agree- ment to be presented for their consideration. Presently, the City has a standard of acquiring easements at the rate of $2,000 per acre for temporary and $4,000 per acre for permanent. This would result in a purchase agreement offer of $8,880 for both permanent and temporary easements. Acquisition of a site is guaranteed by a maximum bond of $50,000 as provided for by Byron Watchke as a part of the development agreement for the Safari Estates plat. Although the cost for the acquisition of the site is guaranteed by Byron Watchke, it is felt that Council should approve any and all offers made for the acquisition of this site as payment would be made by the City with reimbursement through the letter of credit. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny a pur- chase agreement offer in the amount of $8,880 to be presented to the Siegs for possible acquisition of a required reservoir site. `, ' SIEG RESERVOIR SITE SCALE: I�=100 I c� N I M vi az 0 50 u 260' w cn w RESERVOIR tai - 0 SITE acn -to 0 N i N 1.5 ACRES a w 3d PERMANENT EASEMENT6 � 0.42 ACRES -- 260' 31 2 �--- ---650=- - -15 SOUTH LINE SECTION 31 � &POL-m VAII-C-Y /EA&AIN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION C otLpo 2Arc C30U KDARy EASEMENT Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Three Item #2: Special Assessment Deferment Request - Ann Pietsch -- -A_t__tFe_ March 31, 1981 6peciaiAssessment Committee meeting, a request was received from Mr. Fred Pietsch of 4275 Dodd Road re- questing deferment of assessments associated with Project 241 due to a financial hardship. Although he did not qualify under Ordi- nance #66 as a senior citizen, his hardship was based on the fact that he has not been gainfully employed due to a physical disability which was verified by his physician in a written letter to the Special Assessment Committee. The Special Assessment Committee recommended that, because of the financial hardship and physical disability, the assessments be postponed for one year with recon- sideration to be given to future postponements based upon additional information indicating continued hardship. This recommendation was presented and accepted by the Council at their meeting of April 7, 1981. Because the first year's installment had already been based on the 1981 tax rolls, the City issued payment directly to Dakota County for the 1981 installments relating to special assess- ments for Project 241. Copies of correspondence are enclosed on pages r through ( which inform Mr. & Mrs. Pietsch of the need for reverificatio-n--o-F—the hardship. On page 7 is a copy of a letter submitted by Mrs. Ann Pietsch requesting consideration of continued deferment of the assessment due to a financial hardship only. Since the Special Assessment Committee meeting, it appears that Mr. and Mrs. Pietsch have separated and Mr. Pietsch no longer requests deferment of the assessment based on his physical disa- bility as he no longer resides at that address. This information is being directed to the Council for their consideration and possi- ble action. This item is being directly to the Council's attention due to the fact that it is the only item that the Public Works Department has received Dertaining to special assessments at this time. Also, Mrs. Pietsch is requesting expeditious action on her request due to the fact that her mortgage company will very shortly be initiating en escrow account on her monthly payments to cover the outstanding special assessments of record as levied against the property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the defer- ment request by Mrs. Pietsch for a specific period of time or for- ward this item for consideration by the Special Assessment Committee. 0 F1 BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMASEGAN MARK PARRANTO JAMES A. SMITH THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS October 20, 1981 MR & MRS FREDERICK PIETSCH 4275 DODD RD EArAN MN 55123 CITY..OF, LAGAN y'•'3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O. BOX 21199 „EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE 4$4.8100 �.qKl Re: Project 241, Deferent of Special Assessments Dear Mr. & Mrs. Pietsch: THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENEVAN OVERSEKE CITY CLERK As you may recall, you had previously requested of the Special Assessment Committee consideration of deferent of the special assessments based on a hardship due to Mr. Pietsch being unemployed resulting from medical disabilities. Based on vour hardship request, the City Council approved deferment cf the special assessments with the un- derstanding that the City would make payment for the special assessments already le- vied to be collected in 1981. The City has previously made payment for the first half of the special assessments which were due in May of 1981. The second half pay- ment was with the understanding that the hardship situation still exists. Therefore, would you please resubmit your existing situation pertaining to a continuation of ! this hardship so that the City may process this second half payment of special assess- ments. Also, this verification of continued hardship will be required in order to continue the deferment of this special assessment which will be due and collectable in 1982. This verification of hardship must include a letter from the attending phy-.ician verifying the continued medical disability exists which was the basis for granting this hardship request. If you have any questions pertaining to this, please feel free to contact me. We would appreciate your response by November 15th if at all possible. Sincerely, Cop omas A. lbert, P.F.. Director of Public Works TAC/jack THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY, SS1]1 November 25, 1981 .• PHONE nsa-eloo iL MRS FREDRICK PIETSCH 4275 DODD ROAD EAGAN MN 55123,, Re: Project 241, Deferment of Special Assessments - Parcel No. 10-65800_010-02 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Pietsch: On October 20, 1981, a letter was sent to your attention indicating that the second half of the 1981 payment for special assessments levied in association with the above - referenced project number based on your submitting verification of the continuation of the hardship that was evident at the time the City Council agreed to defer your special assessments. We had requested this information to be received by November 15 so that the City could process this second half payment within the proper time frame. Although no response was received by the requested date, the City processed the second half pay- ment of your special assessments in good faith that it would be forthcoriing. . Ha•7ever, before continued deferment of these assessments can be provided for, we must receive this verification of continued hardship in the form of a letter from the at- tending physician verifying the continued medical disability of Mr. Pietsch, which was the basis for granting the original hardship request pertaining to deferment of special assessments. Please be informed that the special assessments as originally levied still remains as a matter of record against your parcel, and as such, will continue to show up on your next tax statement which will be due and payable to the County Auditor by May, 1982. Therefore, your deferment of special assessments is no longer in effect as a result of lack of verification of hardship. SincerellyJ, /1 71Lmnas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public hbrks -TAC/jack cc - Ann Goers, Special Assessment Clerk 10 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR THOMAS EGAN CITY OF EAGAN EUGENE N N O E VAOVERBEKE MARK PAR TO CITY JAMES A. SMITH '- THEODORE WACHTER 3195 PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMBERS P.O. BOX 21199 ' EAGAN, MINNESOTA SS1]1 November 25, 1981 .• PHONE nsa-eloo iL MRS FREDRICK PIETSCH 4275 DODD ROAD EAGAN MN 55123,, Re: Project 241, Deferment of Special Assessments - Parcel No. 10-65800_010-02 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Pietsch: On October 20, 1981, a letter was sent to your attention indicating that the second half of the 1981 payment for special assessments levied in association with the above - referenced project number based on your submitting verification of the continuation of the hardship that was evident at the time the City Council agreed to defer your special assessments. We had requested this information to be received by November 15 so that the City could process this second half payment within the proper time frame. Although no response was received by the requested date, the City processed the second half pay- ment of your special assessments in good faith that it would be forthcoriing. . Ha•7ever, before continued deferment of these assessments can be provided for, we must receive this verification of continued hardship in the form of a letter from the at- tending physician verifying the continued medical disability of Mr. Pietsch, which was the basis for granting the original hardship request pertaining to deferment of special assessments. Please be informed that the special assessments as originally levied still remains as a matter of record against your parcel, and as such, will continue to show up on your next tax statement which will be due and payable to the County Auditor by May, 1982. Therefore, your deferment of special assessments is no longer in effect as a result of lack of verification of hardship. SincerellyJ, /1 71Lmnas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public hbrks -TAC/jack cc - Ann Goers, Special Assessment Clerk 10 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Four 0 There is one (1) item on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss this item in further detail, the item should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. 911 EMERGENCY SERVICE AGREEMENT A. Agreement for Implementation of 911 Emergency Number Service -- The City has received a copy of an agreement from the Dakota County Board of Commissioners stating that the County Board of Commissioners will pay the $22,367 installation and equipment cost for the 911 emergency operational system. Apparently, installation of the equipment will begin within the next thirty days. The only cost to the City at this time will be $660 for providing the electrical installation required in the Police Department basement. The agreement is in order for execution by the City Council. It is essential the City move ahead with execution of this agreement and installation of the 911 equipment to comply with action taken by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners and the mandate of the state legislature. If study, once completed, examining the feasibility of having the Dakota County Sheriff's Department provide the dispatching for the City of Eagan and that alternative is found to be more feasible, this cost will become a minor consideration in long term economics. If the decision, after completion of the study, is to retain the police dispatching service at a City level, the 911 emergency system will be in operation as required by the state. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve and authorize execution by the Mayor and City Clerk of an agreement for the imple- mentation of the 911 emergency number service. Action is also in order to approve the low proposal for electrical installation required in the Police Department basement for this equipment to Bob Johnson Electric Company in the amount of $660. Special Note: The minutes will indicate two separate motions on these items even though they were combined into one agenda item. L.-61 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Five PROJECT 350 0 A. Project 350, Oster Addition Utilities -- In response to a peti- tion received from the developers and an adjacent property owner in Treffle Acres, a feasibility report was prepared and presented to the Council on December 1, 1981 for a public hearing to be scheduled for January 19. All notices have been placed in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners. At the time of preliminary plat approval, there were concerns pertaining to landscaping for this proposed subdivision due to the configura- tion of this subdivision and the double fronted lots that were created with the backyards fronting on Skyline Drive. Enclosed on pages through JZ, are copies of the landscaping plan that has beA submitted. -Tt should be noted that the proposed street to serve the Oster Addition has been located directly opposite of the driveway of Ms. Virginia Harrington (Lot 4, Treffle Acres). This should eliminate the concern that Mrs. Harrington had of headlights shining in her bedroom window as traffic would now be directly aligned with her garage. In addition, the developer is proposing to provide two black hill spruce and one Colorado spruce trees in Mrs. Harrington's yard to help diminish the impact of headlights. The only recommendation the staff would make after reviewing this landscaping plan is that several of the proposed black hill spruce trees should be relocated from the west plat line adjacent to the park to the south boundaries of this plat to help screen the backyard areas that would be adjacent to Skyline Drive. The feasibility report is enclosed on pages J3 through 3 5 In response to a written request by Mrs. Harrington, this feasi- bility report includes an alternate providing for utility service to her lot (Lot 4) and also Lot 3 to determine cost feasibilities for their information. It should be noted in the report that two alternates were proposed for the upgrading of Skyline Drive. The first one would propose installation of concrete curb and gutter adjacent to the Oster Addition only with a first stage 27 foot wide 1'k" bituminous mat only. Under this proposal, all costs associated with construction would be the financial responsibility of the Oster Addition. Under the alternate, if utility services are provided to Lot 3 and 4 of Treffle Acres, no future construction for utilities would be anticipated, thereby allowing the full construction of Skyline Drive to its ultimate section as a part of this project. This would provide a concrete curb and gutter on both sides to the stan- dard 32 foot wide width and 2 lifts of bituminous surfacing. Under this alternate, the lots in Treffle Acres would then be assessed their fair share of street construction based on benefit received, rd 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Six 0 as determined by a per lot equivalent share of the total street construction. The staff will have various cost alternates available based on per lot cost as compared to front foot cost due to exces- sive frontage of the lots in the Treffle Acres. The Public Works Director will discuss in further detail this feasibility report at the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve or deny Project 350 for streets and utilities to the Oster Addition. /0 !v::Rr Al KE`/ TAT EE SYM_ OLS_ 01 C.0 Fd ,1 ,leL- , I C� AmUR... MAP4F....... ACeR G-nvivALA �i CI A P _ , .5AIJE- ('-)LEN I hiI -LE . Acm PLATAPOJDES RnE GLfAf l �) 1rA. lo l�}rN6EA vvNyMVs �L)Wq 1U5 r1L. FU5 /a „ i'�� µ W IAOPA- C(LA3 ? f P.AOMANT CRAB I"1nt-L)s � F)LRCK C,' -E wLp2,'1 t)C) S PIZI:GE------ Ise e•H vUwC.:, �i)r•�C>EI�� vLaltY:iY I .5 'Li i�;�G _ _hSGcf IP)C) -- ILI! '�o 0 juy V J i U I; L; J74 i ' I KE`/ TAT EE SYM_ OLS_ comr-low NnrALE- NI -CAL dJA .4 ,leL- l a AmUR... MAP4F....... ACeR G-nvivALA A P _ 3 .5AIJE- ('-)LEN I hiI -LE . Acm PLATAPOJDES RnE GLfAf l �) 1rA. lo l�}rN6EA vvNyMVs �L)Wq 1U5 r1L. FU5 /a „ i'�� µ W IAOPA- C(LA3 P.AOMANT CRAB I"1nt-L)s � F)LRCK C,' -E wLp2,'1 t)C) S PIZI:GE------ Ise e•H vUwC.:, �i)r•�C>EI�� vLaltY:iY I .5 'Li i�;�G _ _hSGcf -- 343 4 Z3 v4 -v - C 06 D N Wqo"'/ew 52-7-S4 12,003 A as -ear T AL .7-47 'A 4''51 A I IJ &I j 113.41 r"t, -Sark.3 IV 6.9� %FV' 46, N h > IV )j.xS IAP 67. 3t so K &0 /2, C6 3- 9. 7c. A Ar ar A= a -33' X4' 4 al-s"S3 I, a 000 ayY 0 0 0 o 0 PA 0)1 �3 PP4 lAf ��Tc. o 3 Pm Al 89-S1'i2"W g,"iL EGD REPORT ON OSTER ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 350 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1981 /3aftedWa, Rte, 4,de1dz 9 4aeoc&,&d, 9,w. e&v&diwq C, St P"4 m4ftm D& 13 4,i,1" & 4",oe-41&4r Am giOa A"ala p t "Oyes d O 2333 *4 9.._. #VA.. 36 81. PA.w.: 612.636-4600 November 13, 1981 0(S 1956 - �th - 1981 �}D nniversary Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 Re: Oster Addition Utilities and Streets Project 350 Our File No. 49243 Dear Mayor and Council: Ulf. G. Rannuoo. Y.E. Rabrrf W. Horum. P.E. Jnuph V. Anderlik. P.E. lbndfard A. Lemberg. P.E. Rlrhard E. tumrr, P.L. Jw..n C. Olrnn. P.E. Transmitted herewith is our report for Oster Addition, Project 350 report covers street and utility construction for Oster Addition. Glynn R. Cook. P.E. K,,fh A. Gordon. P.E. 7hon.a+ E. Nay,,, P.E. Rlrhard W. Fwler, P.E. Robes G. Srhurdrhf. P.E. .Af.,tm L. Sorrala. P.E. Oonald C. Rurgardf. P.E. Jerry A. Hourdo.. P.E. Afark A. Hamar., P.E. Clmrla A. Erlrkran Lt. Af. Pewd by Had.. H. OW" M,ld E. Ofm This We will be pleased to meet with the Council and 'other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Respectfully submitted, BONESTR_0g0, RROOSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark R. Rolfs MRR:11 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: November 13, 1981 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: / T omas A. Colbert Director of Public Works Date: //—a?3—P 7243a /+ 0 0 OSTER ADDITION SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, services, storm sewer, and streets to serve the Oster Addition. Also included is an alternate (Appendix C) which provides for utility service and street surfacing to Lots 2, 3, and 4 in Treffle Acres located south of Skyline Drive. The Oster Addition consists of nine single family units located in the SE 1/4 of Section 4 in the NW intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Skyline Drive. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible as it relates to en— gineering matters and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. This project is based on the premise that the developer will perform all grading and subsoil correction to City standards prior to the City performing the work referenced in this report. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as two contracts. Contract I pro— vides for the construction of all utilities and the placement of an aggregate base on a properly prepared subgrade. Contract II provides for the construction of the remaining portion of the aggregate base and placement of a bituminous surface in conjunction with the concrete curb and gutter. DISCUSSION: CONTRACT I A. SANITARY SEWER: An 8 inch P.V.C. sanitary sewer is proposed to serve the Oster Addition as shown on Figure 1 at the back of this report. The sewer will be located within Oster Drive in order to provide service to the nine — 1 — 7243a 0 0 lots located within Oster Addition. The proposed sanitary sewer will connect to an existing 8" plug located on the westerly right-of-way line of County Road 31 installed under Project 334 in 1981. Lots 2 b 3 will require addi- tional fill to provide gravity service to the sanitary sewer due to limiting elevations of the existing lateral in Pilot Knob Road. Detailed grading and design plans will determine the extent of fill required. B. WATER MAIN: A 6 inch D.I.P. water main is proposed to service the Oster Addition as shown on Figure 2 at the back of this report. The water main will be constructed along Oster Drive in order to provide service to the nine lots located within Oster Addition. The proposed water main will connect to an ex- isting 6" plug located on the westerly right-of-way line of County Road 31 in- stalled under Project 334 in 1981. As part of this project, the proposed water main will be continued west along Skyline Drive from its intersection with Oster Drive to the west edge of the plat. The water main will be looped in the future by continuing west from this point along Skyline Drive and con- necting to an existing 6" Plug located between lots 7 and 8 in the Rustic Hills Addition approximately 2,700 feet to the west. C. SERVICES: This construction provides for the installation of sanitary sewer and water services to a point 15' beyond the property lines within Oster Addition. Sanitary sewer services are proposed to be 4 inch P.V.C. pipe, and water services to be 1 inch copper tubing. D. STORM SEWER: It is proposed to construct a 15" R.C.P. storm sewer from the existing 15" plug located on the westerly right-of-way line of County Road 31 (installed under Project 334 in 1981) to the low point on Oster Drive as shown on Figure 3 at the back of this report. Storm runoff will be collected at the low point with two catch basins and a 12" storm sewer lead. - 2 - 7243a 16 0 0 E. STREET (Grading/Agg. Base): This construction provides for the proper grading of the subgrade surface after installation of utilities on Oster Drive and on Skyline Drive from its intersection with County Road 31 to the west edge of the proposed plat. Grading is to be followed by placement of a 4 inch aggregate base. The aggregate base thickness assumes that a reasonable sub - grade exists or can be provided with a minimum amount of correction. CONTRACT II F. STREET (Surfacing): This construction provides for the placement of the remaining 2 inches of the aggregate base followed by construction of the bi- tuminous surface in conjunction with surmountable concrete curb and gutter. Because future utility construction within Skyline Drive right-of-way is re- quired to service Lots 3, 4 b 5, it is proposed to surface only a 27 foot width of the first 1-1/2 inches of bituminous mat on Skyline Drive and to place concrete curb and gutter on the north side only. The remaining street construction in Skyline Drive would then be completed as a part of that future utility project servicing Lots 3 6 4 of Treffle Acres. (See discussion under Appendix C, page 12.) _Oster Drive is to be surfaced with a 30 foot width of two 1-1/2 inch lifts of bituminous surface and concrete curb and gutter. The proposed street surfacing is shown on Figure 4 at the back of this report. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Assessment Area Construction Area Part of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 Part of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 4 of Section 4 Parcel 040-75 Parcel 040-75 - 3 - 7243a 17 0 0 COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates for the facilities described in this report are presented in Appendix A at the end of this report. A summary of these costs are as follows: Contract I Sanitary Sewer $11,400 Water Main 15,800 Services 8,920 Storm Sewer 77 Qin Street (Grading/Agg. Base) 11,000 Total Estimated Project Cost - Contract I $59,030 Contract II Street (Surfacing) 32,200 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST - CONTRACTS I 6 II ...... $91,230 The total estimated cost for Contract I and Contract II including con- struction, contingencies, and all related overhead is $91,230. Overhead costs are estimated to be 27% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. EASEMENTS: A thirty (30) foot permanent easement is required for utility con- struction within Oster Addition. This easement is located between lots 6 and 7 and extends from tke Oster Drive cul-de-sac to the westerly right-of-way line of Co. Rd. 31. A fifty (50) foot temporary construction easement is also required along this same line. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments for utility and street construction are proposed to be levied against benefited property in Oster Addition. Trunk sanitary sewer and trunk water main have been previously assessed under Project No. 10 and 49, respectively. - 4 - 7243a Is 0 0 Trunk storm sewer has not been previously assessed and is therefore pro- posed to be assessed as part of this project. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report. Final assessment rates for construc- tion of lateral facilities will be determined from the final costs and as- sessed accordingly to the benefited property. Trunk storm sewer rates in effect at the time of this publication are as follows: Trunk Storm Sewer - Single Family .......................$0.0374/sq.ft. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Trunk Fund - 5 - 7243a 19 Project Cost Revenue Balance SANITARY SEWER Lateral $11,400 i Lateral $11,400 TOTAL $11,400 $11,400 - 0 - WATER MAIN Lateral $15,800 Lateral Assessment $15,800 TOTAL $15,800 $15,800 - 0 - SERVICES Lateral $ 8,920 Lateral Assessment $ 8,920 TOTAL $ 8,920 $ 8,920 - 0 - - 5 - 7243a 19 9 0 STORM SEWER Lateral $11,910 Lateral Assessment $11,910 Trunk — 0 — Trunk Assessment 4,388 TOTAL $11,910 $16,298 +$ 4,388 STREET Grading/Agg. Base $11,000 Surfacing 32,200 Street Assessment $43,200 TOTAL $43,200 $43,200 — 0 — No revenue is required from the City's trunk fund for utility or street construction. A positive trunk fund balance of $4,388 is anticipated for storm sewer. PROJECT SCHEDULE Contract I Contract II Present Feasibility Report Dec. 1, 1981 Dec. 1, 1981 Public Hearing _ Jan. 19, 1982 Jan. 19, 1982 Approve Plans 6 Specifications March, 1982 April, 1982 Open Bids April, 1982 May, 1982 Award Contract April, 1982 May, 1982 Construction Completion July, 1982 August, 1982 Assessment Hearing Sept., 1982 Sept., 1982 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1983 May, 1983 — 6 — 7243a 20 0 A. SANITARY SEWER APPENDIX A COST ESTIMATE OSTER ADDITION PROJECT 350 CONTRACT I UTILITIES AND GRADING 420 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 8'-10' dp. in pl. @ $11.00/lin.ft. $ 4,620 2 Each Std. MH w/casting in pl. @ $900.00/each 1,800 2 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' @ $80.00/lin.ft. 160 9 Each 8 x 4 PVC wye branch in pl. @ $50.00/each 450 1 Each Cut into existing 8" plug @ $100.00/each 100 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 420 Lin.ft. Mechanical Trench Compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 420 0.25 Acres Seed with topsoil @ $2,800.00/acre 700 Total Estimated Construction $ 8,550 +5% Contingency 430 $ 8,980 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 2,420 TOTALSANITARY SEWER ............................... $ 11,400 7 - 7243a 2,1 B. WATER MAIN 650 Lin.ft. 6" DIP, 7' cover @ $12.00/lin.ft. $ 7,800 2 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each 1,800 1 Each 6" Resilient Wedge Gate Valve & Box @ $400.00/each 400 800 Lbs. C.I. Fittings in pl. @ $1.00/lb. 800 1 Each Connect to ex. 6" plug @ $100.00/each 100 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 650 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 650 Total Estimated Construction $ 11,850 +5% Contingency 590 $ 12,440 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 3,360 TOTAL WATER MAIN ................................. $ 15,800 C. SERVICES 450 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary Sewer Service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 2,700 450 Lin.ft. 1" Type K copper water service @ $5.00/lin.ft. 2,250 9 Each 1" Corporation stop @ $40.00/each 360 9 Each 1" Curb stop & box @ $70.00/each 630 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 450 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 450 Total Estimated Construction $ 6,690 +5% Contingency 335 $ 7,025 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 1,895 TOTALSERVICES ................................... $ 8,920 - 8 - 7243a 22 0 D. STORM SEWER 0 300 Lin.ft. 15" RCP, Cl. V, 0'-10' dp. @$20.00/lin.ft. $ 6,000 35 Lin.ft. 12" RCP, Cl. V, 0'-10' dp. @ $17.00/lin.ft. 595 2 Each Std. CB w/casting @ $700.00/each 1,400 1 Each Connect to ex. 15" plug @ $300.00/each 300 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 335 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 335 Total Estimated Construction $ 8,930 +5% Contingency 450 $ 9,380 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 2,530 TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................. $ 11,910 E. STREET (Grading/Aggregate Base 200 Cu.yds. Subgrade Correction @ $3.50/cu.yd. $ 700 50 Cu.yds. Select Granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 300 4,000 Sq.yds. Subgrade Preparation @ $0.35/sq.yd. 1,400 900 Ton Cl. 2 Crushed Aggregate @ $6.50/ton 5,850 Total Estimated Construction $ 8,250 +5% Contingency 410 $ 8,660 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 2,340 TOTAL STREET (Grading/Agg. Base) .................. $ 11,000 - 9 - 7243a V3 0 CONTRACT I Sanitary Sewer Water Main Services 0 Storm Sewer Street (Grading/Agg. Base) TOTAL CONTRACT II ................. CONTRACT II $ 11,400 15,800 8,920 11,910 11,000 $ 59,030 F. STREET (Surfacing) 3,600 Sq.yds. Base Preparation @ $0.30/sq.yd. 450 Ton Cl. 5 gravel @ $5.00/ton 140 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @$12.00/ton 280 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton 25 Ton Bituminous material for mix @ $220.00/ton 1,300 Lin.ft. Surmountable concrete curb 6 gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft 6 Each Adjust MH S CB @ $200.00/each 1 Each Adjust gate valves b boxes @ $200.00/each 0.75 Acre Seed w/topsoil @ $2,800.00/acre Total Estimated Construction +5% Contingency +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin, b Bond Interest TOTALSTREET (Surfacing) ........................ - 10 - 7243a 24 $ 1,080 2,250 1,680 3,640 5,500 6,500 1,200 200 2,100 $ 24,150 1,210 $ 25,360 6.840 $ 32,200 0 9 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 350 OSTER ADDITION Total Rate Area Assmt. (1) Trunk Storm Sewer $0.0374/ft2 117,324 ft $4,388 — 11 — 7243a 2 s' Total Units Assessment Assessed Cost/Unit A. Sanitary Sewer $11,400 9 $ 1,267 B. Water Main 15,800 9 1,756 C. Services 8,920 9 992 D. Storm Sewer (Lateral) 11,910 9 1,323 E. Storm Sewer (Trunk)(1) 4,388 9 487 F. Street (Grading/Agg. Base) 11,000 9 1,222 G. Street (Surfacing) 32,200 9 3,578 TOTAL ...................... $95,618 $10,625 Total Rate Area Assmt. (1) Trunk Storm Sewer $0.0374/ft2 117,324 ft $4,388 — 11 — 7243a 2 s' 9 9 APPENDIX C ALTERNATE PROJECT DISCUSSION: This alternate provides for utility service to lots 3 and 4 in Treffle Acres located on the south side of Skyline Drive. Also included is the construction of Skyline Drive to a full residential width and section with concrete curb and gutter on both sides from Pilot Knob Road to the west line of Oster Addition. Only Lot 2 in Treffle Acres has sanitary sewer service while only Lots 2 b 3 have individual water services from the existing laterals on Pilot Knob Road. While Lots 3 6 4 can feasibly be serviced with sanitary sewer, Lot 5 would require below minimum grades for gravity service. Therefore, it is not pro— posed to serve Lot 5 with sanitary sewer and water as part of this alternate. To provide sanitary sewer to serve Lots 3 and 4 will require the sanitary sewer to be extended to Skyline Drive and to the east along Skyline Drive to the center of Lot 3. No additional water main construction is required to serve Lot 4. Cost estimates for_ the total cost for sanitary sewer, service, and street surfacing to serve Lots 2, 3, and 4 in Treffle Acres and the 9 lots in Oster Addition are presented in Tables 1, 2, b 3. The costs for water main, storm sewer, and street (grading/aggregate base) will remain the same as presented in Appendix A. 12 — 7243a 26 0 0 TABLE 1 SANITARY SEWER 430 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 8'-10' dp. @ $11.00/lin.ft. $ 4,730 200 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 10'-15' dp. @ $14.00/lin.ft. 2,800 3 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 2,700 10 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' @ $80.00/lin.ft. 800 11 Each 8 x 4 PVC wye branch in pl. @ $50.00/each 550 1 Each Cut into existing 8" plug @ $100.00/each 100 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 950 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 950 0.25 Acre Seed w/topsoil @ $2,800.00/acre 700 Total Estimated Construction $ 13,630 +5% Contingency 680 $ 14,310 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin, b Bond Interest 3,870 TOTAL ALTERNATE SANITARY SEWER ..................... $ 18,180 TABLE 2 SERVICES 620 Lin.ft. 4" PVC_Sanitary Sewer Service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 3,720 550 Lin.ft. 1" Type K copper water service @ $5.00/lin.ft. 2,750 10 Each 1" Corporation stops @ $40.00/each 400 10 Each 1" Curb stops b boxes @ $70.00/each 700 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 650 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 650 Total Estimated Construction $ 8,520 +52 Contingency 430 $ 8,950 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 2,420 TOTAL ALTERNATE SERVICES .......................... $ 11,370 - 13 - 7243a W7 0 0 TABLE 3 STREET (Surfacin 3,600 Sq.yds. Base preparation @ $0.30/sq.yd. $ 1,080 450 Ton Cl. 5 gravel @ $5.00/ton 2,250 290 Ton 2331 Bituminous Base course @ $12.00/ton 3,480 290 Ton 2341 Bituminous Wear course @ $13.00/ton 3,770 30 Ton Bituminous material for mix. @ $220.00/ton 6,600 1,800 Lin.ft. Surmountable concrete curb b gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 9,000 6 Each Adjust MH 6 CB @ $200.00/each 1,200 1 Each Adjust gate valves b boxes @ $200.00/each 200 1.0 Acre Seed w/topsoil @ $2,800.00/acre 2,800 Total Estimated Construction $ 30,380 +5X Contingency 1,520 $ 31,900 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 8,610 TOTAL STREET (Surfacing) $ 40,510 A summary of the alternate costs as presented in Table 1, 2, and 3 includ- ing portions which did not change in Appendix A are listed as follows: CONTRACT I Sanitary Sewer $ 18,180 Water Main 15,800 Services 11,370 Storm Sewer 11,910 Street (Grading/agg. base) 11,000 Total Estimated Alternate Project Cost - CONTRACT I $ 68,260 CONTRACT II Street (Surfacing) 40,510 TOTAL ESTIMATED ALTERNATE PROJECT COST - CONTRACTS I 6 II $108,770 - 14 - 7243a :26 6 Assessments for the alternate utility and street construction are proposed to be levied against the 'benefited property in Oster Addition and against the benefited lots in Treffle Acres south of Skyline Drive. A preliminary assess- ment roll is presented in Table 4. It is not proposed as part of this alter- nate to assess Lots 2, 3, and 4 in Treffle Acres for trunk storm because their drainage is not tributary to Oster Addition. It is recommended trunk and lat- eral storm sewer be assessed to Lots 2, 3, and 4 when Skyline Drive is con- structed further west to its low point where storm sewer will be required. TABLE 4 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL ASSESSMENTS FOR LOTS IN OSTER ADDITION Total Lots Assessment Assessed A. Sanitary Sewer $ 18,180 11 B. Water Main 15,800 10 C. Services - Sanitary 5,600 11 Water 5,770 10 D. Storm Sewer 11,910 9 E. Street (Grading/Agg. Base) 11,000 12 F. Street (Surfacing) 40,510 12 G. Trunk Storm Sewer 4,388 TOTAL ASSESSMENT .............. $113,158 - 15 - 7243a 291 Cost/Lot (Oster Addn.) $ 1,653 1,580 509 577 1,323 917 3,376 488 $10,423 0 0 ASSESSMENT FOR LOTS IN TREFFLE ACRES - 16 - 7243a 30 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 A. Sanitary Sewer -- $1,653 $1,653 B. Water Main -- -- 1,580 C. Services - Sanitary -- 509 509 Water -- -- 577 D. Storm Sewer -- -- E. Street (Grading/Agg. Base) $ 917 917 917 F. Street (Surfacing) 3,376 3,376 3,376 G. Trunk Storm Sewer -- -- TOTAL ASSESSMENT ............. $4,393 $6,455 $8,612 - 16 - 7243a 30 W 49243 SKYLINE D'VE 5 4 3 2 /i TREFFLE ACRES W 49243 FIGURE NO. 1 OSTER ADDITION SANITARY SEWER i IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE. LATERAL ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY SCALE 1 1" - 100' BONES7ROO, ROSENE, ARDERUK 6 ASSOC, INC. C1111MT110 acwtus St. til, MIIne�M� - - 31 SKYLINE D'VE 5 4 3 2 TREFFLE ACRES FIGURE NO. 1 OSTER ADDITION SANITARY SEWER i IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE. LATERAL ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY SCALE 1 1" - 100' BONES7ROO, ROSENE, ARDERUK 6 ASSOC, INC. C1111MT110 acwtus St. til, MIIne�M� - - 31 w N ., N 5 4 3 2 f I • . 3 a 5 ITER 6 t) 2 6�� EX. 6" PLU U l "I OSTER ADDITION FFRI a - I9 N i Y WATERMAIN SKYLINE VE F J a • IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE " LATERAL ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY FIGURE NO. 2 • 49243 - SCALE: I" • 100' WHESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK i ASSOC. INC. CMSRITNIC ENGINEERSK. til. Ml.w. sz 5 4 3 2 x TREFFLE ACRES WHESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK i ASSOC. INC. CMSRITNIC ENGINEERSK. til. Ml.w. sz 1 49243 Ex. 15" PLUG I . E \ 7 \' 1 ° FIGURE NO. 3 •I OSTER ADDITION STORM SEWER • IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE: TRUNK AND LATERAL ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY ® TRUNK ASSESSMENT AREA SCALE : I" - 100' BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIR i ASSOC, IMC, CD11SKTMG EMMMERS S1. P.I. ffih r . R3 SKYLINE DRIVE 5 4 3 2 TREFFLE ACRES FIGURE NO. 3 •I OSTER ADDITION STORM SEWER • IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE: TRUNK AND LATERAL ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY ® TRUNK ASSESSMENT AREA SCALE : I" - 100' BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIR i ASSOC, IMC, CD11SKTMG EMMMERS S1. P.I. ffih r . R3 �•-12-�l IT FUTURE BITUMINOUS B CONCRETE CURB TYPICAL SECTION SKYLINE DRIVE FIGURE NO. 4 {.49243 J OSTER ADDITION STREETS _- • IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY SCALE ; I" - 100' BDKESWAA ROSW MDEItUK A A&M W- CDI=TM OICEIfEK St. hl. 34 SKYLINE DFIVE 5 4 3 2 TREFFLE ACRES FIGURE NO. 4 {.49243 J OSTER ADDITION STREETS _- • IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY SCALE ; I" - 100' BDKESWAA ROSW MDEItUK A A&M W- CDI=TM OICEIfEK St. hl. 34 w h 49243 FIGURE NO. 5 � o I U a OSTER ADDITION m' i ALTERNATE PROJECT a SANITARY AND STREET •, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 SCALE 1" = 100' KONWROO, KOSM ANDERUK A. ASSOC. INC. CORMTIIIC L/1 PV*S L,t I. Ml.mt. -24- Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Seven PROJECT 352 0 B. Project 352, Norvin Oaks and Storland Road Watermain -- In response to a petition received from the developer of Norvin Oaks, a feasibility report was prepared and presented to the Council on December 1, 1981 with a public hearing being scheduled for January 19, 1982. Because this provides for the extension of a water main to the west boundary of Norvin Oaks Subdivision only, special consideration was used to determine benefit from this water - main extension as detailed in the report. The Public Works Director will be available at the public hearing to discuss in further detail the method used by staff to determine benefit used in this project. Enclosed for your information on pages 37 through 4jc' is a copy of the feasibility report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve or deny Project 352 for the extension of watermain to Norvin Oaks along Storland Road. 36 0 ON 0 PROJECT NO. 352 EAGAN, MINNESOTA H= Ba, Rte, 4.ds4id .9 4 t ,, 9o. eq 'c st pa"4 R&mm & 37 Cl 2335 IV. 7--4 4,,A.;, 36 S1. Pd. Af. 55„3 %Gee.: 612.636.4600 November 11, 1981 Honorable Mayor and City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 ytc. O 0(� 1956 - th - 1981 nniversary Council 1E • URn G. -'..w.", mn. P.L'. Rnh,rl 11'. R. P.E. 6,1,111 C. And dlk. P.G. /IurAlu.d A. Lrmbrrg. P.E. Na'lund F. ruin,.. Y.F. Jmun C. open. P.E. G1,1111 R. Conk, P.r. Keldr A. Gardan. P.E. J]mmar E. Nny,,. P.E. Rirhard IV. Furor, PX. Rnbnl G. Srhunirhl. P.E. Alarrin L. Sonvle. P.E. Mn.ld C. RurgarJt P.E. J, -,,y A. Bourdon. P.E. ANA A. lleruon. P.P. Clmdrr, A. Erirkmn Lrn Al. Pawrb4y Nerlan Al. 01J." D.vid E. Glenn Re: Storland Road Water Main Project 352 Our File No. 49244 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our Report for the storland Road Water Main Extension, Project 352. This report covers the water main construction along Storland Road and within Norvin Oaks. We will be pleased'to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to review this report. Respectfully submitted, BONE00,OSEjjjNDE RrL�IK -- b ASSOCIATES, INC.� Ma Hanson MAA :1 i I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engine r under the laws of tthhee/ tate of MMinnesot Date: November 11, 1981 Reg. No. 14250 Approved by: Thomas A. Culbert Director of Public Works Date: 7231a M 0 STORLAND ROAD WATER MAIN SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of water main along Stor- land Road east from Slaters Road to serve the adjacent property and the pro- posed Norvin Oaks Addition. FF.ASIAiLiTY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible and is in accordance with the Master Water Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract including water main construc- tion and all restoration work. DISCUSSION: A. WATER MAIN: A 6 inch water main is proposed to be constructed on the north side of Storland Road east from Slaters Road. The water main will con- nect to an existing 6" plug located at Slaters Road. The water main will be constructed to the proposed Norvin Oaks Plat and terminate. Looping of water main is not required as part of this project. Residual pressures are anticipated being in the 30 to 40 psi range until the proposed ground reservoir on Safari Pass is constructed. Once the ground reservoir is completed residual pressures will be between 60 to 70 psi. R. SERVICES: This construction provides for the installation of water ser- vices to the three lots within Norvin Oaks. To minimize pressure losses esti- mated from 20-30 psi (due to the length of services required to service each lot) 1-1/2" services are recommended. It is estimated 20 to 30 psi would be lost if a 1 inch service were constructed which would put the residual pres- sures well below recommended levels. 7231a - 1 - 39 0 0 AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Assessment Area SW 1/4 Section 31 Parcel 011-50 Parcel 011-77 Parcel 011-55 (Norvin Oaks) 0 Construction Area SW 1/4 Section 31 Parcel 011-50 Parcel 011-77 Parcel 011-55 (Norvin Oaks) COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented at the back of this report. A sum- mary of these costs are as follows: Water Main $22,870 Services 1,060 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS ....... $23,930 The total estimated cost including contingencies and all related overhead is $23,930. Overhead costs are estimated at 27% and include legal, engineer- ing, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments for water main are proposed to be levied against the benefited property on a lineal foot basis. Because of the unusual and irregular configuration of the Norvin Oaks Addition as it pertains to frontage along public right-of-way, a combination of "front feet" and "lateral benefit from a trunk water main" was incorporated in calculating the proposed assessment for the unplatted parcels adjacent to Storland Road. The 1981 rate for lateral benefit from a trunk water main ($12.00/FF) was applied to the frontage along Storland Road (664' + 664' = 1,328 L.F.). The difference from this generated revenue and the estimated cost of the project was then divided equally among the 3 lots of Norvin Oaks. At this present rate of $12.00/F.F. 7231a - 2 - M 0 This results in an equivalent calculated assessable footage of 192 F.F. for each of the 3 lots in Norvin Oaks. This $12.00/F.F. rate will be adjusted proportionately based on the final assessment costs for construction as com- pared to the estimated costs in this report. The cost for service construc- tion was divided equally between the three lots in Norvin Oaks. Trunk water main was assessed as part of Project 254 therefore no trunk area charge is proposed to be assessed. REVENUF. SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: WATER MAIN Lateral Lateral Assessment TOTAL SERVICES Lateral Lateral Assessment TOTAL Project Cost $ 22,870 $ 22,870 $ 22,870 $ 1,060 $ 1,060 Revenue $ 22,870 $ 1,060 $ 1,060 Balance IWI_ No revenue is required from City trunk funds to finance this project. - 3 - 7231a �I 0 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans b Specifications Award Bids Construction Completion Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes — 4 — 7231a 42 0 November 17, 1981 December 15, 1981 Winter, 1982 Winter, 1982 May, 1982 Summer, 1982 May, 1983 0 A. WATER MAIN APPENDIX A COST ESTIMATE STORLAND ROAD WATER MAIN PROJECT 352 0 940 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water Main @ $14.00/lin.ft. $ 10,640 2 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,275.00/each 2,550 1 Each 6" Gate Valve and Box @ $350.00/each 350 650 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.00/lb. 650 1 Each Remove 6" plug and connect 6" dIP @ $200.00/each 200 100 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 600 30 Lin.ft. Remove and reinstall 36" CMP culvert @ $10.00/lin.ft. 300 60 Ton Class 5 aggregate base 100% crushed @ $6.00/ton 360 1.0 Acre Seed with topsoil and mulch @ $1,500.00/acre 1,500 Total Estimated Construction $ 17,150 +5% Contingency 860 $ 18,010 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 4.860 TOTALWATER MAIN .................................... $ 22,870 SERVICES 60 Lin.ft. 1-1/2" Type "K" copper water service @ $5.00/lin.ft. $ 300 3 Each 1-1/2" Corporatin stop @ $75.00/each 225 3 Each 1-1/2" Curb stop and box @ $90.00/each 270 Total Estimated Construction $ 795 +5% Contingency 40 $ 835 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 225 TOTALSERVICES ...................................... $ 1,060 7231a. OR 0 0 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL STORLAND ROAD WATER MAIN PROJECT 352 November 11, 1981 A. WATER MAIN Norvin Oaks Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 SW 1/4 Section 31 Parcel 011-50 Parcel 011-77 7231a SUMMARY TOTAL..................... UJI Assessment $ 2,311 2,311 2,311 $ 7,968 7.968 $22,870 Total Assessment $ 2,664 2,664 2,664 $ 7,968 7.968 $23,930 Assessable Estimated Footage Rate/F.F. Norvin Oaks Lot l 192' $12.00/f.f. Lot 2 192' $12.00/f.f. Lot 3 192' $12.00/f.f. SW 1/4 Section 31 Parcel 011-50 664' $12.00/f.f. Parcel 011-77 664' $12.00/f.f. TOTAL 1,906 B. SERVICES Norvin Oaks Assessment Lot 1 $ 353 Lot 2 353 Lot 3 353 $1,06-0 Norvin Oaks Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 SW 1/4 Section 31 Parcel 011-50 Parcel 011-77 7231a SUMMARY TOTAL..................... UJI Assessment $ 2,311 2,311 2,311 $ 7,968 7.968 $22,870 Total Assessment $ 2,664 2,664 2,664 $ 7,968 7.968 $23,930 W f7 Q F Z 0 a: U. SCalB , -cvv a 0 I '�vn- 1. EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATER MAIN PROJECT N04 352 BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSM INC PONSULTING ERORIEERS S St. Peal, Mlceeeete LATERAL ASSESSMENT (Front Footage) COMM 49244 • Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Eight i PRELIMINARY PLAT/LONE OAK HEIGHTS A. Midwestern Associates, Orrin Aune, for Preliminary Plat Approval of Lone Oak Heights & Variance to Exceed the Lot Coverage -- For sake of history, a public hearing was held before the APC at their regular meeting held on September 22, 1981 to consider a preliminary plat entitled Lone Oak Heights consisting of approximately 145 dwelling units and a variance to exceed the lot coverage require- ments in a residential district. The APC recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to fifteen (15) different condi- tions. This item was then heard by the City Council at the October 20, 1981 meeting. A motion was made and seconded, with all members voting in favor except City Councilmember Wachter who voted no, that read as follows, "The motion to continue the consideration of the application until November 17, 1981 and that the Council authorize the hiring of an appraiser to prepare a brief report as to the probable cost incurred by the City, in the event that the Council should determine that the portion of the property should be downzoned to a lower density from an R-4 to an R-3 and further, to determine the additional cost of rezoning to R-1 or some R-2 buffer areas; further, to allow the staff to continue to study the project including the density determination; further to deter- mine whether to include the private street in determining the den- sity of the project." The appraisal work was not completed prior to the 11-17-81 meeting, and, therefore, a second continuance was given until the December 15, 1981 meeting. A number of issues were discussed at that meeting, which raised several questions re- quiring review and study by City staff. These questions have been addressed by the City Attorney and City Planner. Questions re- garding downzoning as it relates to the Martin Shields' property have been addressed by the City Attorney in a memorandum found on pages47 through 4$ The developer has revised the plan in order that no variances for density or lot coverage will be required with the preliminary plat. For a revised report as pre- pared by the City Planner, refer to pages through s Again, copies of the APC minutes from the Septem er 22, 1981 meeting are enclosed on pages�4 through S& for your review. Also included in each City ounci packet -a—re---t-he new drawings for the proposed preliminary plat of Lone Oak Heights Addition. Large drawings are included without a page number. Reductions of these drawings are found on pages S % through Sc? . If members of the City Council desire any of the information that was passed out in the December 15, 1981 City Council packet that included a copy of the appraiser's report and original City Planner's report, feel free to contact the City Administrator's office and that in- formation will be made available as a part of the administrative packet. Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Nine ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the recom- mendation of the APC. Special Note: It is the option of the City Council if there are changes proposed by the developer and or resi- dents that the City Council feels are significant enough to hold a public hearing to refer the plat back to the APC for additional review. The trailer was removed from the property as requested by the City Council the week after the December 15, 1981 meeting. M. 0 • PAUL H. HAUGE Bit ASSOCIATES. P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA $3122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 January 8, 1981 AREA CODE 812 TELEPHONE 4$4.4224 RE: Downzoning - Mr. & Mrs. Martin Shields Property (Lone Oak Heights) Dear Tom: We have been asked to discuss the possibility of downzoning the Martin Shields property at the Southwest corner of Lone Oak and Pilot Knob Roads in response to community objections to the development of a condominium and townhouse com- plex. The current zoning of the property is Planned Development with under- lying R-3 covering `_,Iacres and R-4 covering 5_y acres. There appear to be at least three basic issues: 1. Can the City Council legally downzone the property and if so, how could it be accomplished? 2. Is the City responsible for damages if the City downzones the property? 3. If the City downzones, can Mr. Shields demand the return of the property that he sold and dedicated to the City as park land at the time of the R-3 and R-4 rezoning,in 1975? It appears that in 1974 the City of Eagan finalized negotiations with Mr. and Mrs. Martin Shields for the purchase and dedication of park land as requested by residents of that area of Eagan and provided in the City's park plan. The Agreement provided that Mr. Shields sell approximately 6 acres and dedicate an additional 4 acres to fulfill the City's park dedication requirements for the balance of the Shields' property east and west of Pilot Knob Road. An additional provision of that purchase agreement is the source of much con- cern at recent hearings for development of Mr. Shields' property. The purchase agreement provision stated that the sellers "will proceed with the rezoning" of the remaining 17 acres. It was "understood" that if rezoning was not com- pleted within 60 days of the purchase agreement, the seller had the right to revoke the purchase agreement. The provision appears to be worded so as to avoid a promise of rezoning or future zoning. It merely gave the sellers the right to back out if rezoning was not allowed at that time and place. This is based upon the theory of municipal law that a Council cannot bargain away its police powers (zoning is one) or bind a future Council in regard to legislative functions. 4-7 0 0 Mr. Thomas Hedges January 8, 1982 Page 2 Can the City now downzone the property in "breach" (as has been argued) of its agreement with the owner? The answer appears to be yes. While this office has not gone into great depth on the subject, it appears from the facts at hand that the general rule of law would apply. Zoning is a police power which cannot be contracted away. Rezoning is a legislative function of City Govern- ment meaning that a decision of one Council will not generally bind future Councils. It is important to note that the proponement of rezoning is obliged to provide a rational for rezoning based on the public good and general welfare. Reasons such as extreme density causing overburdening utilities and park land, traffic congestion, safety, etc. could be reasons. There is still a problem with damages should the Council decide to downzone. Will the City be responsible for damages or can the owner take back the park land for "breach" of the agreement? We cannot be sure that a Court and/or jury might not find that the owner had been misled by the agreement and should not suffer loss due to his reliance on it. In conclusion, it appears that the City Council has the power to downzone. There is a possibility of liability for damages if the Court found that there was a contract to rezone although our interpretation of the specific agreement is that there was no promise other than the right of the owner to renege if the property were not rezoned by a certain date. The loss of the park land seems unlikely since the owner was paid for a portion and there would still be dedi- cation requirements if the land were developed. This issue was not researched, however. Sincerely, V David G. Keller DGK:ras Lone Oak Heights Revision January 13, 1982 Page two The applicant has looked at the possibility of shifting Shield's Lane more easterly into the center of the plat. once you start shifting Shield's Lane easterly, then you have two setbacks to consider and the overall parcel is very difficult to construct dwelling units and parking and retain the setbacks between the new alignment of Shield's Lane and the existing property lines. Therefore, the location of Shield's Iane and the present location gives the greater flexibility for site layout and design. The applicant is also at.this time not proposing to relocate the gas line easement which runs through the present site. With this new plat configuration, the developer would be able to construct the proposed development without relocating the gas line through the project. It appears that the developer has tried to incorporate all of the re- quirements that the City Council directed the developer to research at the December 15, 1982 Council Meeting. The reduction in density would put the preliminary plat right on the maximum number of units allowed in the project with the possibility that if the bedroom mix in the units would shift, it would be under the allowable density, however, providing the 3 -bedroom unit would make the project more marketable to all ranges of people. Therefore, the proposed project would contain one dwelling unit over the required density for this specific mix. The staff would like to point out that this density has been calculated deducting the 60' right-of-way of Shield's Lane. The parking for the .overall development is 10 spaces under the 2.5 parking spaces per unit requirement, but is in excess of the 2 parking spaces per unit. If the Council desires the applicant to add 10 addi- tional spaces, these should be added in as a requirement to the condi- tions. If the preliminary plat is approved, it should be subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1. A variance would have to be approved 0.9% over the lot coverage requirement, and the variance for one dwelling unit over the maxi- mum allowable within this oondominiun district, or revise the unit mix to provide one -bedroom vs. the three-bedroan units which then would core below the dwelling unit requirement for this particular site. 2. The plat should be subject to all easements as requured by City staff. 3. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be ap- proved by the City staff. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by the City staff, and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. SO 0 TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 13, 1982 RE: REVISION TO THE LANE OAK HEIGHTS PRELIMINARY PLAT At the December 15, 1981 City Council Meeting, the City Council continued the preliminary plat of Lone Oak Heights for 30 days for the developer to revise the plan in order that no variances for density or lot coverage would be needed for the preliminary plat. The Council also directed the developer to look at re -designing the plat to shift the road more into the center of the plat, or take direct access onto Pilot Knob Road. Staff has had contact with Bernard Larson of Dakota County Plat Commission and he had indicated that obtaining access onto Pilot Knob Road between Tower - view Road and Ione Oak Road would be difficult, and that this access would not be granted unless access could not be obtained to the parcel frau any other location. The revised plat has lowered the dwelling units from 139 to 121. The mix on the comm+in inn units would be 6 three-bedroom dwelling units, 30 two-bedroom dwelling units and 30 one -bedroom dwelling units. The square footage required for the style and type of dwelling unit would be 206,160 square feet. The net density on the site is 200,376 square ft. Therefore, the applicant is 5,784 square feet over the density allowed in the condominium area. If the applicant reduced the 3 -bedroom units, the applicant would gain approximately 8,700 square feet and would cane in compliance with Ordinance 52. The following is a breakdown of the revised preliminary plat. REVISED DENSITY CALCULATION WITH DEDUCTION OF THE 60' STREET Parcel Acres Lot Coverage Dwelling Units Dwg.Units Condominium 4.6 20.9% 0- M. Townhouse 7.5 20.0% 55 55 TOTAL 12.1 121 121 Note: In calculating the density for the condominium, the number of units vary in accordance with the number of stories and the number of bedrooms per unit. Therefore, the numbers allowed in this particular area can deviate and no one set number would be correct. Normally, in calculating density for an R-4 District, if you use a proximate of 14-15 units in a 3 -story building, you would range between 64 and 69 dwelling units. In reviewing the overall plat, all setback requirements are met for setbacks along public streets and rights-of-way. Also, all setbacks are net between dwelling units. In reviewing the lot coverage, the townhouse lot coverage is right at 208 for the R-3 portion of the develcprmsnt and the lot coverage for the condominium, or the R-4 portion of the development, is at 20.9%, which is just barely over the 20% lot coverage requirement. 41 Lone Oak Heiqhts Revision January 13, 1982 Page three 5. The developer shall provide a tot lot for the proposed pre-schoolers within this development. An adequate bond shall also be required for this tot lot. 6. The developer shall construct a trail from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School somewhere between the condominium and townhouse devel- opment. 7. The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowners' Association by-laws for City review. B. The development agreement and planned development agreement shall be approved prior to the final plat of Lone Oak Heights. 9. The plat shall be reviewed by Dakota County Plat Commission, because the plat abuts two County roads. DCR/jach ENGINEERING REC(3nMMUICES 10. An internal street connecting Towerviea Road and Ione Oak Road must be constructed to City standards for public residential streets. All private access drives serving more than 4 units must be a 24' minimum width. 11. The developer shall agree to pay all levied, deferred, pending and other assessments associated with benefit received from public utili- ties.'and/or streets adjacent to this proposed plat as determined by the Public Works Department as estimated in a mem dated October 8, 1981 and revised on January 14, 1982. TAC/jack .S 0 0 TO: ANN COERS, SPECIAL ASSES.91ENT CLERK FFal: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS rll-e— DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1981 (Revised 1-14-82) RE: PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSR92US AGAINST PARCEL NO. 10 00900 011 02 (Martin Shields) PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEICHTS An assessment research of the above -referenced parcel was performed to de- termine what outstanding assessments must be collected by the City of Eagan prior to development of this property. This memo is meant to be a research of all assessments that have been, or will be, the responsibility of this parcel. ASSESSMENTS PREVIOUSLY LEVIED 1. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area Assessment - 1968 2. Sanitary Sewer Lateral Assessment (Lone Oak Road) - 1970 3. Water Lateral Assessment (Lone Oak Road) - 1970 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 1. Storm Sewer Trunk Area (Project 177), 596,772 -_ square feet at $.0375 per square foot $22,378.95 2. Water Trunk Area Assessment (Deferment from 1976), 13.7 acres at $770.00 per acre 10,549.00 3. Lateral Benefit from trunk watermain (Towerview Road), 575.7 feet at $14.35 per foot 8,261.30 4. Lone Oak Road street assessment (Project 200), 385 feet at $24 per foot (estimated residential equivalent) 9,240.00 S. Pilot Knob Road Street Assessment (Project 200), 1,084.3 feet (150' corner lot credit) at $24/ft. - (RER) Estimated Residential Equivalent 26,023.20 6. Sanitary Sewer Lateral (Project 347), public hearing - 10-20-81 (estimate)57999-99 TOTAL OUTSTANDINr PENDING ASSESSMEPUS FUTURE ASSESSABLE COSTS 1. Toaerview Road Street Improvement (Project )M), 575.7' at $25/ft. (estimate only) $14,392.50 SZ I 9,003.1( 85,455.5` M • • SUBJECT TO APPROVAL MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 22, 1981 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, September 22, 1981 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan City Hall. Present were Chairman Harrison and APC Members Krob, Bohne, Turnham, Gits, Hall and Wilkins. Also present were City Planner Runkle, Public Works Director Colbert, City Engineer Rosene and City Attorney Hauge. AGENDA Upon motion duly made and seconded the agenda as distributed was approved with the exception that the application of James C. Kilbourne for variance from front set -back requirements for home on Lot 2, Block 4, Drexel Heights Addition be continued to the next regular meeting; further, that the staff review with the Planning Commission the action by the Council concerning sign permits and Day Care Ordinance revision. All voted yes. Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Minutes of the meeting of August 25, 1981 were approved as distrsibuted. All voted yea. NORMAN VOGELPOHL VARIANCE - YANKEE SQUARE The public hearing regarding the application of Norman Vogelpohl for variance for 5 feet from the 20 foot parking set -back requirement along public street on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition, was first convened by Chairman Harrison. Norman Vogelpohl was present and explained the error that he had created in that the curbing in the parking area was installed with only a 15 foot set -back from the property line, or 20 feet from Washington Drive. The staff, including Tom Colbert explained that there have been a number of revisions that have been requested of Mr. Vogelpohl in the site plans for his restaurant in Yankee Square, most of which have been corrected. Mr. Vogelpohl stated that he had received letters from Mr. Colbert but had not reviewed them. It was noted the driving lane at the restaurant was at the variance point, and that rebuilding the parking lot to avoid the variance would require a good deal of construction. Mr. Colbert stated that there was no formal approval of the site plans, although Mr. Vogelpohl stated he had a signed formally approved site plan from the City Staff. It was further noted land- scaping plan is required and Planning Commission members stated they were concerned about deviations from the original plan and the oridinance require- ments. After consideration discussion, Krob moved, Harrision seconded the motion to continue the hearing until the next regular meeting so that the applicant can meet with the staff and attempt to resolve the issues that are not in compliance with the plan and ordinances, including landscaping and site plan. All voted in favor. LONE OAK HEIGHTS ADDITION PRELI MINART PLAT AND VARIANCE The public hearing regarding the application of Midwestern Association - Orrin Aune for preliminary plat approval of Lone Oak Heights, consisting of S4 APC Minutes September 22, 1981 14.09 acres and containing 145 dwelling units, together with an application for variance to exceed lot coverage in residential district was next convened. Mr. Aune was present as were other representatives for the applicant. Mr. Aune stated a private road is planned between Lone Oak Road and Towerview Road within the development, although the staff recommended that it be a public street according to city public street standards. Mr. Aune agreed with the street being built to city standards but requested that set back requirements be waived. It was noted further that the density permitted would be less if the street were upgraded to public. street standards and with required ordi- nance set backs. Mr. Aune stated that NSP would relocate the gas main through the property and thatthe applicant had agreed with the relocation at the developers' cost. It was further noted that Dakota County will not allow access from the development to Pilot Knob Road and that only Towerview and Lone Oak Road could be used for access. Mr. Aune showed a revised plan which changed the location of parking and there were concerns by staff as to the location of the garages in relation to parking. A large number of affected residents from the general area were present and objected to certain aspects of the development, including the impact on Pilot Knob School and the addi- tional traffic on Lone Oak Road. Mr. Aune stated there would be two home- owner's associations and staff was concerned about the private street owned and maintained by two different associations with potential problems. Mr. Aune further stated that the land is not feasible for underground parking because the condominium buildings are not large enough to be economically feasible for underground parking. There were also objections to the density proposed and the fact that the adjoining playground is already heavily used. Member Hall recommended that the Planning Commission consider recommending approval, subject to compliance with the ordinance requirements on density, and that the interior street be upgraded to city standards with allowing set- back deviations because of the existing planned development. Two tot lots are being proposed in the project. A representative from Banco Mortgage was present and stated that FHA may require the street to be dedicated to the City and further stated that under FHA requirements, that sales could not initially be made to non-resident owners. There was also a suggestion that a looped street be installed in the townhouse area. After considerable discussion, Hall moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subjecet to the following: 1. That the parking area on the revised plan be reviewed, including the parking near the condominium buildings and that the parking throughout the complex comply with ordinance requirements and staff recommendations. 2. That the total number of units comply with density requirements for the specific zoning on the entire parcel. 3• That in the event that the planned development is not completed within three years from the time of final approval by the council, with the potential for extension of time at the discretion of the City, that the property then revert to Agricultural zoning. 4. If the site plan is approved, the gas main shall be relocated so as not to interfere with any of the proposed buildings. 2 Sr APC Minutes September 22, 1981 5. The townhouses shall be relocated to meet the setback requirements in accordance with Ordinance 52. 6. The plat shall be subject to all easements as required by City staff. 7. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Staff. 8. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not re- leased until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 9. The developer shall provide two tot lots for the pre-schoolers within the development. 10. The developer shall construct a trail to city standards from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School between the condominium and townhouse develop- ment as determined by the City staff. 11. The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the homeowner's association Articles and By-laws for City review. 12. A development agreement and planned development agreement shall be approved prior to approval of the final plat of Lone Oak Heights. 13. The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts two county roads. 14. The developer shall provide the necessary drainage and utility easements throughout the addition for water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer lines as determined by staff. 15. The developer shall install a street, to city standards, from Lone Oak Road to Towerview, through the development that would allow for future dedication to the City as a standard public street in the event the mortgage lender requires dedication or the event the city determines it should be dedicated for proper maintenance; further that the street setback provisions not be required. It was also noted that a number of other variances would be required under the proposal including reducing the number of units in both the condomi- nium and townhouse areas, the set -backs along Pilot Knob Road and the total square footage for the mix that is proposed. All members voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no. It was suggested that the developers meet with the area residents informally, prior to consideration at the next council meeting, and Mr. Aune agreed with the proposal. RAVINE PLAZA - REZONING, PRELDUNARY PLAT AND VARIANCE The public hearing regarding the application of Amcon Corporation and Patrick Gannon to rezone approximately 19 acres from agricultural to PD 3 cS6 IA O'rEsi..... 5pGAiES VALLEY ENGINEERiNG CO, INC CA".... �• •JPO SUITE 204, '"MRS EDGE DFFIEE PLAZA .YI1 1.. I • PO BOY ATB PRIOR LANE, BOX 479 TELE PRONE 16Q)44 LONE OAK HEIGHT'S I' oYII ! JQ ' i I� I I II ,I I� ,1 it 11 II �I , 1(4( Iww•!Ow 1; ••-1 ;,;e:i{ LEGEND .--_. I � 1�IDbtfM , AYfVYIE 1 I II � I! I .. I a 4'1mlr� ud II. I . II. II 'I t, 'I �I WCWE5TERN" ASSOCIATES W P 4Lu1. M b,Sr • LONE VALLEY ENGINEERING CO, INC SUITE 2", WATERS EDGE OPPICE PLASH FO 60a 41 PRIOR LAKE, MNNE 5556 TEUE ONE (6¢1 .2570 J HEIGHT'S 7`' .� 2( I .I v.011 Ie u - j._a.,. LEGEND . — �. char ¢"ol -- •:�`r--ts7—=�_.'--.a- I E fiLMlla/ faIIOR's1 � � _ iii rriu •�.-, r a : r.+�'-�::T_ _ ;I 11 II _ I - I I I 1 I .. I I I ' ql.T w Seoe I1 l� /77�7 oil .. ... ..... ... .... .. M 7=7 l� /77�7 oil 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Ten AMCON CORPORATION FOR RAVINE PLAZA B. Amcon Corporation for Rezoning from A to PD to Allow Two Office Buildings and Hotel Complex; for the Preliminary Plat of Ravine Plaza & for a Variance to Exceed the Height Limitation in a Com- mercial District -- Due to the fact the height limitation study is not complete, this item will be continued until the February 23 1982 City Council meeting. The applicants have been notified that the subcommittee is working on the height limitations issue and will be making a recommendation to the Advisory Planning Com- mission at the 1-26-82 meeting and then their findings will be presented to the Eagan City Council at the February 2, 1982 meeting. If there is any delay by either the special subcommittee or Advisory Planning Commission, the item will again have to be continued for that purpose. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the item until the 2-2-82 City Council meeting. BURNET REALTY FOR PYLON BUSINESS SIGN C. Burnet Realty for a Conditional Use Permit for Pylon Business Sign located in the Cedarview Addition -- A public hearing was held before the APC at their regular meeting held on November 24, 1981 and continued until the December 22, 1981 meeting. Action was taken by the APC recommending approval of the pylon sign for Burnet Realty subject to no variances being granted or any addi- tional pylon signs being granted for the other two (2) office buildings. Enclosed on page (,1 is a copy of those APC minutes. At the last City Council meeting e d on January 5, 1982, the City Council expressed concern that the property owner be aware that, if a pylon sign is granted to Burnet Realty, there will be no addi- tional signs granted for the other two office buildings. The City Administrator was directed to write a letter to the property owner and request a response from the owner by the January 19 City Council meeting. For a copy of the City Administrator's letter and response from Mr. William Brandt, who is the owner of the property, refer to pages 6 -*a through _6 For information relating to the City Planner's report, refer o pages 6 through 10 of the 1-5-82 City Council packet. If any member of the City Council has mis- placed that information, please contact the Administrator's office and copies will be made available as a part of the administrative packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi- tional use permit for a pylon business sign for Burnet Realty as recommended for approval by the APC . M 0 *UBJECT TO APPROVAL MINUTES OF A REGULAR METING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION CEAGAN, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 22, 1981 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, December 22, 1981 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan City Hall. Present were Chairman Harrison and APC Members Wilkins, Turnham, Vogt, Bohne, and Krob. Also present were City Planner Runkle, Public Works Director Colbert, Assis- tant Planner Dave Osberg and City Attorney Hauge. MINUTES Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was resolved that the Minutes of the previous meeting be approved with the exception that on page 1 relating to the minutes of the previous meeting, that the words proctor density compaction should be proper density computation. BURNET REALTY The continued public hearing regarding the application of Burnet Realty for conditional use permit for pylon business sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Addition, 4655 Nicols Road, was then convened by Chairman Harrison. The matter had been continued from the November 24, 1981 regular meeting. Leonard MacKinnon, Manager of the local Burnet Realty office was present and there was discussion concerning the 300 foot spacing requirement. The owner, Mr. Brandt, is aware of the 300 foot spacing and commission members suggested joint use of the sign. After discussion, Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. The pylon sign may not be located within 300 feet of any other pylon sign measured on the same side of the street. 2. The pylon sign may not project more than 27 feet above ground level. 3. The pylon sign may not exceed 125 square feet of signage per side. 4. The pylon sign shall not be located nearer than 10 feet from any property or dividing line. 5. The sign shall be in conformance with all other applicableordin- ances. 6. Further, that a letter be sent to the owner with a copy of the applicable ordinance provision indicating that this would be the only permit for pylon sign in the subdivision because of the 300 foot spacing requirement. All voted in favor. 0 BEAAYOR IST MAYOR THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1110MAS F6AN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS January 6, 1982 CITY OF EAGAN 519S PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O. BOK 11199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55111 PHONE 454-8100 MR BILL BRANDT� 1$010 GLAZIER AVE P. APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Cl IV C114A Re: Pylon Sign Request for Burnet Realty at Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Addition, Mico sRoad Dear Mr. Brandt: In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on January 5, 1982, an application of Burnet Realty for a conditional use permit for a pylon business sign to be located on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Addition, 4655 Nicols Road, as recommended for approval by the Advisory Planning Commission, was continued until the January 19. 1982 regular City Council meeting. The City Council is not certain that a pylon sign advertising a real estate business is the best use of the only pylon sign that will be allowed for the three (3) office buildings on your property. The City Council is in- terested in knowing who the prospective tenants are or the anticipated occu- pancy for the two buildings that are unoccupied at this time. The City Council is concerned that, if this pylon sign is granted, a request will be made by a tenant of one of the additional office buildings for a pylon sign in the near future. Since the City Council has not deviated from its sign ordinance provisions of not allowing pylon signs to be located within 300 feet of other pylon signs on the same side of the street, you will not be allowed to have any additional pylon signs requested for the two additional office buildings at any time in the future if the pylon sign is granted to Burnet Realty. The Eagan City Council would like your response to this issue in writing prior to the January 19, 1982 City Council meeting so the application sub- mitted by Burnet Realty and the recommendation of the Advisory Planning Commission can be acted upon at that time. If you have any questions regarding the concerns expressed by the City Council, please feel free to contact this office at any time. Sincerely, !.1 Thomas L..41Hedges City Administrator 6 a THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. cc: Mr. Leonard MacKinnon, Burnet Realty; Dale Runkle, City Planner 0 0 Brandt Management Company 15010 GLAZIER AVENUE APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (612) 432-3200 William F. Brandt President January 12, 1982 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: In responding to the attached letter, let me first say it is a comforting feeling knowing that as property owners in the City of Eagan, we have a city council as responsive as you are to the future needs and concerns of building owners and tenants as displayed in the attached letter. The fact that you are looking out for the future needs of future tenants for proper signage is very commendable indeed. We as owners have agreed to allow Burnet Realty to locate a pylon sign on our property for it is our understanding that the future signage needs of our future tenants can be satisfied by placing a building sign on each of the two additional buildings without violating the sign ordinances provision of not allowing pylon signs to be located within 300 feet of one another. We anticipate placing these building signs on the west side of each building (or the freeway side) to give us future exposure. Would you please notify me at once if our assumptions are incorrect. At this time we do not know who the prospective tenants are or what the anticipated occupancy is for the two buildings. Future building signs should suffice these needs, however. Should you, have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Kindes rega�s,;2 -� �,/ (JAN William F. Brandt 141rC2 /rclnEnclosure 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Eleven GRAVEL PIT LICENSE ANNUAL RENEWAL D. Gravel Pit License Annual Renewal for Arnold Leitner -- Informa- tion regarding this item has been partially accumulated, and due to the absence of Chief Building Inspector Peterson who is attending state building officials schooling late this week, this information will be provided with the administrative memo on Monday, January 18, 1982. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the annual gravel pit license renewal for Arnold Leitner. There are ten (10) items of organizational business that must be considered by the City Council. Those items are listed as A. through J., and for additional information on these items, please refer to pagesS through �Z It will be necessary for the City Council to tame separate action on each of the ten separate items. Ballots will be available for voting on Item E., that being appointments for the APC and Advisory Park & Recreation Committees. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: for each organizational business item. BE Separate action is necessary 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 15, 1982 SUBJECT: ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS A meeting held in the first month of each calendar year is consi- dered an organizational meeting for the purpose of: ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS A'. Acting Mayor B. Legal Newspaper C. City Depositories D. Official Posting Places E. Advisory Planning Commission and Advisory Park & Recreation Committee Appointments F. Health Officers G. City Council Meetings H. Committee Appointments I. Fiscal Consultants J. Legal Consultant A. Acting Mayor It is a statutory requirement to appoint an Acting Mayor who presides in theabsence of the Mayor. All Councilmembers are eligible for election by the City Council. In 1981, City Council - member Smith was the Acting Mayor and would preside in the absence of Mayor Blomquist. The Acting Mayor presides in the absence of the Mayor at City Council meetings and all other activities per- taining to the City of Eagan. B. Legal Newspaper It is also a statutory requirement f. -)r the City to designate a newspaper as the official legal newspaper for the City. The statutes specifically state that a City can only designate a legal newspaper of general circulation in the City as its official news- paper. There is published in this newspaper during the year each ordinance and other matters as are required by law to be so pub- lished and such other matters as the Council may deem it advisable and in the public interest to have published in this manner. Some of the items that must be published or are optional include: a) Ordinances; b) Annual Financial Statements; c) Council Proceedings; d) Notices of Elections; and e) Resolutions. It is important to follow a thorough pattern in utilizing a legal publication for the following reason. The law requires an official matter to be published in the official newspaper publication; for example, if an ordinance is not published in the official newspaper, it is more than likely not valid. The Dakota County Tribune and Current Newspapers have both requested a designation to be the City's legal newspaper. Attached as pages i1 through '7%_ are copies of the proposals. 6S Organizational Business Memo January 15, 1982 Page Two C. City Depositories It is a statutory requirement also that depositories be designated for all City funds. The term "depository" refers to a place or places in which a City keeps its money. Any national bank, state bank, private bank or trust company permitted to do banking business and any federal savings and loan association may be designated as a depository for City funds. More than one bank or savings and loan may be designated as a depository for City funds and, except as limited by the Council resolution, provide security which the institution is able to furnish. There is not a limit on the amount which may be deposited in one institution. The City of Eagan in the past years has taken a two part action that 1) The City of Eagan has named Mid-America Bank as the general depository for purpose of holding a checking account to pay bills throughout the year, and 2) Several depositories have been desig- nated for the purpose of investing idle funds. Enclosed on page is a letter from the First Bank requesting consideration to maintain either the payroll or checking accounts; both are cur- rently serviced by Mid-America Bank. Also enclosed, on page 10 is a copy of a memo from the City Clerk -Treasurer listing tt a 3epositories for investment of funds and comments about the sharing of the daily accounts. D. Posting Place Historically, the City designated four official posting places which included the Eagan City Hall, the Lone Oak Tree at Hwy. 49 and Lone Oak Road, Cedarvale Shopping Center and Yankee Drug. The Lone Oak Tree is now designated for historical purposes; infor- mation is not posted at that location. Special meeting notices have been posted on a regular basis at the Eagan City Hall. Due to the Eagan Chronicle, Dakota County Tribune and City wide news- letter, posting at City Hall is sufficient. 0 Organizational Business Memo January 15, 1982 Page Three E. Advisory Planning Commission and Advisory Park & Recreation Committee Appointments The following Advisory Planning Commission appointments are up for consideration: 3 Year One Year Alternate (1982-83) (1982) (1982) Thomas Gits X Lloyd Krob X Joe Harrison X Dale Vogt X It will be necessary to make two (2) appointments to three (3) year terms, one (1) appointment to a one (1) year term (vacant because of resignation of Joe Harrison) and one (1) appointment to the one (1) year alternate position. Thomas Gits, Lloyd Krob and Dalr Vogt have all expressed interest in being reappointed to the commission. In addition, the following residents expressed interest and were interviewed by the City Council: Robin A. Broms, Steve A. Darling, Floyd J. Forsberg, Wally Hafstad, Thomas E. Mann, Pamela A. McCrea, Garrett E. Mulrooney, Dale C. Nathan, Kenneth A, Pirkl, Frances Winkel and Michael W. Wold. Curt England and Joan S. Maddux expressed interest in either the Planning Commission or Park Committee. The following Advisory Park Committee appointments are up for con- sideration: 3 Year (1982-83) Richard Carroll X Donn Schumacher X Michael Thomas X It will be necessary to make three (3) appointments year terms. Richard Carroll and Donn Schumacher interest in being reappointed to the committee. expressed interest and who were interviewed by th Tom Gustafson and, also, Curt England and Joan M interested in either committee as stated above. for three (3) have expressed Residents who e Council are Ma 67 who were Organizational Business Memo January 15, 1982 Page Four F. Health Officers In past years, the City has appointed a Health Officer, which is presently Cedarvale Medical Clinic. If there was an epidemic, or, for example, there are unsanitary conditions which exist in housing or restaurants or some other areas of the City, the Health Officer could be called upon to write a letter and ask that the area be cleaned up. The City would also work with the County Health Board and Minnesota Department of Health and Welfare. G. City Council Meetings Each year, the City Council must designate days and times speci- fically for City Council meetings. In years past, the City has met on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. which is designated as official City Council meetings. It is recommended that the same date and time be continued so it is not confusing to the general public as to what days and times the official City Council meetings are held at City Hall. H. Committee.Appointments Several committee appointments can be made by Mayor Blomquist at the organizational meeting. The list of standing committees is as follows: 1. Personnel Committee; 2. Finance Committee; 3. Community Development and Public Relations Committee; Public Works Committee. 1. The.Personnel Committee was created in 1977 for the purpose Of writing a ersonne o icy and also to create a foundation for personnel procedures. More recently, the Personnel Commit- tee completed a _job classification document for all employee positions. The Personnel Committee does not meet on a regular basis, however, is available if the City Council should ask for a special review or study regarding salary compensation plans, personnel related matters such as personnel records, affirmative action, union contracts or other related matters. The two City Council members who served on the Personnel Com- mittee in 1981 were Tom Egan and Ted Wachter, with Mr. Egan as chairman. 2. The Finance Committee was established to investigate from time to time t e practicality of issuing new bonds for the City, whether it be for equipment certificates, general obli- gation or industrial revenue. The Finance Committee has re- searched many special programs such'as the tax exempt mortgage financing and other industrial revenue tax exempt mortgage type financing programs. The Finance Committee will review any application if a special study is requested by the City E Organizational Business Memo January 15, 1982 Page Five Council. The Finance Committee also meets and reviews all other special projects as directed by the City Council that involve budgetary expenditures. The two members of the City Council who served on the Finance Committee in 1981 were Jim Smith and Mark Parranto, with Mr. Parranto acting as chairman. 3. The Community Development and Public Relations Committee is th-e--THIra committee. This committee has been comprise of two Council members and the Mayor. It functions as an advisory committee to the City Council for purposes of adver- tising and attracting new commercial, industrial and resi- dential development to the community. This committee has not functioned actively in that capacity, however, was respon- sible for publishing community newsletters in 1978, 79 and 80. In response to the request for an economic development committee, it might be feasible during 1981 that this commit- tee investigate alternatives and a procedure for creating an advisory committee or some other channel to emphasize various aspects of commercial, industrial and residential growth. This committee must also investigate whether there should be continuance of the City wide newsletter. This com- mittee was also organized in 1977 and its members during 1981 were Mayor Blomquist and Tom Egan, with Mayor Blomquist serving as the chairperson. 4. The Public Works Committee is a fourth committee and in- cludes utilities, roads, par s and even issues that relate to the airport commission. This committee has studied the recommendations from the City Administrator and also the Director of Public Works concerning the construction of wells, reservoirs, and new utility mains. It also relates to various street improvements, maintenance and new construction as well as snow removal and other related items. This committee does not meet on a regular basis, however is available to study certain issues of the Public Works operation as designated by the City Council. This committee was also formed in 1977 and had two members, Mark Parranto and Mayor Blomquist, with Mr. Parranto serving as chairman, in 1981. • a1111Mo The City Council, in setting up the four (4) standing committees, attempted to limit the number of standing committees to four workable committees which all contain somewhat a broad range of topics. The purpose of the standing committees is to conduct investigations, to make reports on matters of facts. Often, the committees are used to study facts and make recommenda- tions. The City Administrator works very closely with all four (4) committees and normally supplies information and other data to the committees' chairperson and members when committee meetings are held. All meetings are open to the public. The meeting notices 69 0 0 Organizational Business Memo January 15, 1982 Page Six are prepared for all meetings, stating the location of the meetings and items for discussion. The committees are advisory to the City Council. There is no action taken, and, therefore, formal minutes are not required; however, a report is generally prepared by the City Administrator or a committee member which is presented to the City Council for any action that is required at a regular meeting. Fiscal.Consultant Each year, a fiscal consultant is appointed by the City Council to provide fiscal advice and handle bond sales for the City of Eagan. Miller & Schroeder is currently acting as the City's fiscal agent. Since there is no written agreement with Miller & Schroeder, technically, they are hired per bond issue on a continuing basis per discretion of the City Council. J. Legal.Consultant The law firm of Paul Hauge & Associates is providing the City with an excellent service and it is again recommended that Paul Hauge be appointed as City Attorney for the City of Eagan. Enclosed on page���� is a letter I requested from Mr. Hauge that outlines his proposedfee schedule. Mr. Hauge, in the same letter, is requesting appointment as the prosecuting attorney. The City has received a proposal from the firm of Ramstad, Theisen & Kennedy to serve as prosecutor for the city. If the City Council is in- terested in receiving a quotation from that firm and an interview action to appoint the prosecutor could be deferred until the 2- 2-82 meeting. The letter is enclosed on page _4g-2- for your review. 70 • • AREA 612.463.7664 DAKOTA aKOT ® 1 0 D C® Y TRIBUNE 1 MAIN OFFICE - FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55024 BRANCH OFFICES ROSEMOUNT LAKEVILLE BURNSVILLE APPLE VALLEY December 15, 1981 City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Mayor Bea Blomquist: Councilman Thomas Egan: Councilman James Smith: Councilman Jerry Thomas: Councilman Theodore Wachter: We would like to be considered for the appointment as the city's legal newspaper at your organizational meeting Tuesday, January 5, 1982. The Dakota County Tribune has served as the legal newspaper for the City of Eagan for many years. Residents, as well as bidders, are very familiar with the Tribune's legal section. Similarly, because we have been a legal newspaper for many years, our staff is experienced in handling legal notices which, in many instances, require the type of knowledge only experience provides. Recently, the Tribune has made two exciting changes to improve its service to the city. First, we have opened our new Burnsville -Eagan office in an effort to serve residents of Eagan more efficiently. In addition, we have added another reporter to expand our news as well as feature coverage in Eagan. Attached are the certified rates for legals published in the Dakota County Tribune: If you have any questions, please feel free to phone us at 463-7884. A representative from our paper will be pre at the meeting to answer any questions. Sincer Daniel H. Clay Publisher P R I N T E R S A N D P U B L I S H E R S S I N C E 1 8 8 4 �fAFE OF MINNESOTA �J: 4180 �t_ DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF PRINTING CERTIFICATION OF NEWSPAPER LEGAL NOTICE LINE RATE Name of Newspaper Address ,; d 5 sr, Lower Case Alphabet (in points) / 0 akdefg,Ijklmmpgntuvwxyz 1y' Column width (in picas) Z/ L Name of Type Face This certification, based on information furnished by. the publisher of the newspaper named above, shows below the approved maximum rates allowed for legal notices only for ve named newspaper — set in type face described above. /1, First Insertion: :�77 O cents per line. p Subsequent Insertions: / �> • 0 cents per line. *Extra Composition: 210 cents per line. *To be added to first insertion ONLY. 2 State Printer Jr / Date STATE OF MINNESOTA 4181 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF PRINTING CERTIFICATION OF NEWSPAP� LEGAL NOTICE LINE RATE Name of Newspaper __ JCo Address Lower Case Alphabet (in points) 1?0 p Column width (in picas) ��i� SO Name of Type Face This certification, based on information furnished by the publisher of the s aper named above, shows below the approved maximum rates allowed for legal notices only for thea ova ed n spaper — set in type face described above. First Insertion: S2E=2, cents per line. Subsequent Insertions: ��pp7, O cents per line. L *Extra Composition: � a cents per line. *To be added to first insertion ONLY. State Printer Date CWS=PAPWERS 1209E.CLIFFRD. • BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337•TELEPHONE 890-4456 January 6, 1982 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN. Dear Mr. Hedges:. dqN 8 1v�2 I wish to advise you of our request to be considered for designation of The Eagan Chronicle as the City's legal newspaper during the next fiscal year. We have long anticipated changes in state law which would make it possible for The Chronicle to qualify as a legal newspaper, and these changes were enacted during the last session of the Legislature. As a result, we filed necessary documents with the Secretary of State last September, and the Chronicle now qualifies as.a legal newspaper in every respect. 'j(f�oti You may be aware that we were designated as District 191's legal newspaper last summer. We hope that will ansa be designated by the City Council of Eagan when that item comes up on the agenda. I am enclosing a copy of our audited circulation statement, prepared by Certified Audit of Circulations. A more recent audit report has been drafted, but not yet printed. I am also enclosing a copy of that proof for your information. At least one other newspaper serving Eagan also has circulation audited by CAC, so the Council may wish to obtain a copy of their audit report in order to verify circulation comparisons. The deadline for receiving legal copy for The Eagan Chronicle is 4:30 P.M. Fridays, in our office. In the event of holidays, a special deadline schedule will be in effect. Rates for publication of legal notices are set, under statute, by the State Printer of Minnesota. Based on our type size and column width, the following rates are charged by Current Newspapers, Inc. for legal notices: -73 THE BURNSVILLE CURRENT• COUNTRYSIDE• EAGAN CHRONICLE 1209 E. CLIFF RD. • BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337•TELEPHONE 890-4456 Page 2 Hedges January 6, 1982 $.22B per line --first insertion .152 per line --each subsequent insertion .076 per line --extra composition (chargeable for first insertion only) The Eagan Chronicle is delivered by private carrier each Monday of the year to every household and business in the city of Eagan. In addition, we mail subscription copies out of the city to individuals who pay a subscription fee of $12 per year. If you have questions or require additional documentation, please let me know. We will have a representative at the Council meeting when legal newspaper designation is made, should questions arise that night. Sincerely, Mary C�Zi gen !y Publisher MKZ/ash enclosure 71 THE BURNSVILLE CURRENT COUNTRYSIDE* EAGAN CHRONICLE Audit report [Community Newspaper] For 6 month period ending MARCH 31, 1981 EAGAN CHRONICLE - 1980 M Name and year established Current Newspapers, Inc. I J Publishing company E Publishing and circulation policy `SP1, ,Ea n4D,e0O CQC✓LgT1aM5, Mark of Integrity Certified Audit of Circulations, Inc. Fairfield, N.J. 07006 a 201/227-7950 Burnsville, Dakota County, Minnesota 55337 WEEKLY - Tuesday Policy is to publish three weekly locally edited community news- papers printed in photo offset and in tabloid size. Advertising is sold separately or in combination. Each paper consists of 40% local news content. Circulation policy is to mail and carrier deliver single copies without charge to every home, apartment building, and business in the defined circulation area. Carrier delivery is completed Tuesday. © Total average audited circulation 6966 [D Audited paid circulation I Mail subscriptions .....,_........:...... . ...... _ .. El Carrier subscriptions ............................................... ... ONet retail sales ............................... stare, newsstand, rack and counter - - - Total average audited paid_, - ❑g Total average audited voluntary/optional paid - © Audited non -paid circulation ❑i Mail .,.... _..- single copies ...... 1111 Carrier ..... ....... ............. ............. .....single copies .._...... ... _,,—. 17 Carrier bulk ..... ............................ 5 or more copies . ....... ....... 531 6303 132 Total average audited non -paid 6966 ❑o Total average audited circulation ..... total of items A, a and c ..... 6966 El Total average all other audited copies service, files, returns, unsold, bulk 610 [E Total average audited distribution .. total of items o and E 7576 O Total overall audited circulation for nrevious nerinds (INITIAL AUDIT REPORT) %S CC) ::E C Z mn <, r Z {n 0 �aZ 0Xn r C) m c 3 D' M 0 0 O Audit statement ... We have exa&d the records of subject publication for the period covered by Audit Report. Our exam. ination of circulation records and related data was made in accordance with the Corporation's bylaws, rules and auditing standards and included such tests of accounting records and other ❑B Explanatory/additional data auditing proceds were considered necessary in the circum. o c stances. Based h examination, the statements set forth in this report present fairly the circulation position of the publication as verified by the Corporation auditors. Certified Audit of Circulations, Inc. Carrier delivery is subject to independent verification by C*A*C. 9. Publisher's geographical analysis of total audited circulation and total distribution for single issue of WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25, 1981. Carrier Single Copies 6865 TOTAL AUDITED CIRCULATION 6865 All Other Audited Copies Bulk to Stores 350 Other 285. 635 Total Audited Distribution 7500 10. Map of defined primary market 5:81-57 76 Audit rep®rf [Community Newspaper] For 6 month period ending EAGAN CHRONICLE - 1980 Name and year Current Newspapers, Inc. I F21. Publishing company -O Publishing and circulation policy o.1p„ m P p Mork of InteWitr Certified Audit of Circulations, Inc. 309 1981 Fairfield, N.J. 07006 s, 201 /227-7950 Itd9 6 -p=fd"` f -dr - Burnsville, Dakota County, Minnesota 55337 [D Address - WEEKLY - Zmeadw Policy is to publish three weekly locally edited community news- papers printed in photo offset and_ in tabloid size. Each paper consists of 40% local news content. Advertising Is sold separately or in combination. ,Refer to separate reports. Circulation policy is to mail and carrier deliver single copies without charge to every home, apartment buildinbusiness in the TS Publisher's defined area of circulation. er d;liv y is completed Tuesday. O0 p Total average audited circulation T 7646 © Audited paid circulation Q ED Mail subscriptions ............... .......... _............ .... :......... _..... - - 17 Carrier subscriptions........................................................ - MNet retail sales ................................ star.,. ,tend, r.ak and counter Total average audited paid - [11 Total average audited voluntary/optionalpaid - © Audited non -paid circulation pMail ........................... ................... i.gf...Pi..... ............... 35 7 225 ❑7 Carrier .....:..... ............ .................... singl. copies.,...... 386 U] Carrier bulk ................................ s.r mere copies .... ... ....... Total average audited non -paid 7646 O Total average audited circulation..... total of items A.0and c - . 7646 EM Total average all other audited copies ...i<., fil.,, aturns. unsaid, bulk 211 O Total average audited distribution t.t.l of items a and E 7857 ❑r Total average audited circulation for previous perloas 6 months ending %7 3-31-81 . . . . 6966 idif statement ... We have exams d the records of subject auditing procedur as were considered necessary in the circum. publication for the period covered by t#udit Report. Our exam- stances. Basad �ch examination, the statements set forth in Ination of circulation records and re ed data was made in this report presen Arty the circulation position of the publication accordance with the Corporation's bylaws, rules and auditing as verified by the Corporation auditors. standards and included such tests of accounting records and other Certified Audit of Circulations, Inc. 91 Explanatory/additional data Carrier delivery was independently verified by C*A*C between the dates of October 9 and 13, 1981 thru personal interviews conducted on a random selection of households within the Publisher's defined area of circulation. Findings indicated that 91.0% of households regularly received publication. 9. Publisher's geographical analysis of total audited circulation and total distribution for single issue of TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1981. Town E-ogan j j iii Total Carrier Single Copies Carrier Bulk Copies Mail Copies TOTAL AUDITED CIRCULATION All Other Audited Copies Total Audited Distribution 10. Map of defined primary market Zip Single Code Si le Copies 425 40Q� 35 Q Q=�� 135 .. Q 8025 1181-57_— 411First Ban* • 0 Eagan Office rJAA First Minnehaha Naticnal Bank3629 Krestwood LaneP.O. Box 21245 Sc Eagan. Minnesota 55121 612 452-6640 January 7, 1982 Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: On August 12, 1980, First Bank Minnehaha - Eagan Office, first opened its doors to service the financial needs of the Eagan community. In September of this past year, we renamed the bank "First Bank -Eagan Office, First Bank Minnehaha" to better identify with the community we serve. This past Year this office was authorized to act as a depository for city funds, and we would like to request that we be considered as a candidate for maintaining some of those funds. Due to our financial strength and expertise, we feel that our products and service are competitive and in tune with today's market. As you probably know, our bank is affiliated with the First Bank System, a multi -bank holding company based here in the Twin Cities area. Being part of that system allows us additional strength in offering up-to-date and useful products ranging from payroll systems to electronic funds transfer. Thank you for your time, Tom, and should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 452-6640. Sincerel , uss 11 E. Kruse, Jr. Assistant Vice President and Manager Eagan Office %/ Member First Bank System 0 MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR VAN OVERBEKE DATE: JANUARY 13, 1982 SUBJECT: 1982 DEPOSITORIES 0 Please have the following banks, .savings and loan associations and financial institutions designated as depositories for the City of Eagan for 1982: 1. Mid-America National Bank of Eagan 2. First Bank Minnehaha.. 3. First National Bank of St. Paul 4. First National Bank of Minneapolis 5. Northwestern National Bank of St. Paul 6. Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis 7. American National Bank & Trust Company 8. Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Assn. 9. Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Assn. 10. Northern Federal Savings & Loan Assn. 11. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Assn. 12. United Federal Savings and Loan Assn. 13. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn'. 14. Washington Federal Savings:. & Loan Assn. 15. Merrill, Lynch, Fenner & Smith, Ltd. 16. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. It would be my suggestion that we designate Mid-America National Bank of Eagan and First Bank Minnehaha as depositories for the City of Eagan general and payroll checking account funds with the understanding that a study will be made to facilitate a recom- mendation to and decision by the City Council as to which of the banks will actually be used and for which accounts. At this point, I am absolutely opposed to any arrangement more involved than simply giving one checking account to each bank' and to any kind of rotation policy. A one time switch of a single account would cause only the loss of some blank check inventory and some small changes in our operating procedures. s/E. J. VanOverbeke City (;l_erk7T1nance Director C� 0 0 PAUL H. HAUGE & ASSOCIATES. P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA 83122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator CITY OF EAGAN 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 January 14, 1982 RE: 1982 City Attorney Fees Dear Tom: AREA CODE B 12 TELEPHONE 4944224 You asked for a proposal for a 1982 fee schedule from our office for Eagan City Attorney purposes. I would request the following for 1982: General legal work for the City - $40.00 per hour (This rate has not been changed since at least 1977); Legal fees for improvement projects, including street and utility work based upon VC1 of contracts plus change orders awarded; Prosecution services - $35.00 per hour (The fee has been $1400 per month since about 1977 with an average of about 55 to 60 hours per month in 1981 or about $23 to $27 per hour. It is expected the amount of time will increase slightly to at least 60 hours per month on the average, but varies somewhat.). We have enjoyed the association with the City Council, the staff and committee:members, and would propose continuing the relationship for the coming year. 1---1 PHH:me M, ly yours, Paul H. Hauge RAMSTAD, THEISEN & KENNEDY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3918 BEAU -D -RUE DRIVE OEDARVALE HIGHLANDS EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 ROGER J. RAMSTAD December 11 1981 JOEL A. THEISEN JEFFREY W. KENNEDY Mayor B. Bomquist and The City Council - City of Eagan Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota RE: Prosecution for City of Eagan Dear Madame Mayor and Council Members: TELEPHONE 16121452-4252 It is my understanding that bids for the position of prosecutor for the City of Eagan will be under consideration in the very near future. It is, therefore, the purpose of this writing, to state an interest for our,law firm to be considered for that position. We have been in practice in the City of Eagan since December 1, 1975, and since that date have been engaged in the general practice of law. My back- ground includes law clerking with the City of Minneapolis, City Attorney's Office, Criminal Division, and I have been involved in much misdemeanor practice while working here in Eagan. One of my partners, Roger Ramstad, has also been actively involved in criminal practice, and has a great deal of experience in juvenile law, and misdemeanor work. Mr. Kennedy also has had a good deal of experience in the misdemeanor area, and I believe that our office could competently represent the City of Eagan in the position of prosecutors. We could all actively participate, and therefore, have very little conflicts as concerns scheduling, and the time which such a position would require. We would request an opportunity to be considered, and are available upon your request for further information and consultation as concerns this position. I appreciate in advance your consideration. Yours very truly, RAMSTAD, IEISEN $ KENNEDY el A. Theisen JAT:bh <i�'`� 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Twelve PRELIMINARY PLAT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR KINDER CARE A. Richard Nordlund for a Preliminary Plat for a Day Care Center and for a Conditional Use Permit for a Day Care Center/Pilot Knob Heights First Addition -- A public hearing was held at the Advisory Planning Commission meeting on November 24, 1981 to consider a preliminary plat and conditional use permit for a day care center referenced as Kinder Care. This item was continued by the APC to the December 22, 1981 meeting when action was taken by the Ad- visory Planning Commission to recommend denial of the Kinder Care applications for preliminary plat and conditional use permit to the City Council. For a copy of the City Planner's report, refer to pages 8 4�. through. For a copy of additional information prepared by the Planning ssistant, refer to pages q 2 through p c At the APC meeting on December 22, 1981, a number of ques- ti ns and concerns were raised about the ownership of the property in addition to the use of the land. To clarify the ownership issue, a letter was sent from the Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service to the City Administrator, a copy of which is enclosed on pages through 97 Planning Assistant Osberg prepared a follow- up memorandum Cat letter and the action taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, a copy of which is found on page 91 . For a copy of the minutes of that APC meeting, refer to page 99 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the action taken by the APC to deny the Kinder Care applications. 93 SUBJECT APPLICANT LOCATION EXISTING ZONING E CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DAY CARE CENTER - KINDER CARE RICHARD NORDLUND N;^A4 OF TIT . SW a OF . SECTION 15, PnOr KNOB HEIGHTS LST ADDITION LIMITED BUSINESS UNDER A PLANNED DEVELOWENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1981 REPORTED BY: DAVE OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED: The first application submitted is for preliminary plat approval for a day care cen- ter in a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition. The total area of the lot is 22,860 square feet. The second application submitted is for a conditional use permit to allow a day care center in a limited business district. RArKrWYNIS As you may recall from the September 29, 1981 Planned Development review, Lot 1, Block 1 of Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition had yet to be developed with the office complex that was originally approved under the Planned Developnent Agreement. Since that tine, the section of land where the day care center would be constructed has been donated to a charity by the previous owner, Ken Applebaum. Because of tight economic conditions, there have been no further plans for the office complex which would be adjacent to the proposed day care center. Under Section 52.07, Subdivision 7 of the Eagan zoning Ordinance, day care centers may be constructed in a limited business district as a conditional use permit. A 4,900 square foot building is being proposed on the lot, which is 22,860 square feet. At the present time, the preliminary plat shags that the maximum building coverage requirement for a limited business district is not being met. With a 4,900 square foot building being proposed, the required lot size is 24,500 square feet. The pro- posed preliminary plat is not meeting the lot coverage requirement. However, ne- gotiations are under way to acquire the conditional 1,640 square feet necessary to meet the lot coverage requirement. Several of these same day care enter facilities have been constructed in various communities in the 'Rain Cities. Staff contacted several of these com=ities to determine if there have been any problems or objections to these day care facili- ties. One item that was mentioned is that there have been some objections to the red roof on the facility. Another item discussed was the parking requirements for the facilities. Each connunity felt there was adequate parking for the facility. [iii 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - KINDER CARE ADDITION NOVEMBER 24, 1981 PAGE TWO Mile the preliminary plat shows ten parking spaces, there are no specific parking requirements for day care centers as that issue is determined by the Council. The day care center has the capacity to handle 99 children. Experience in other corrmumities shows that the enrollments are usually far from the maximum. Other than the lot size requirement not being met at the present time, staff has re- viewed the preliminary plat and sees no further problems. If approved, the preliminary plat and conditional use permit should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Acquisition of the additional 1,640 square feet necessary to meet the lot coverage requirement must take place before the final plat is approved, with the change included in the final plat. 2. Necessary parking requirements must be determined before final plat approval. 3. A landscaping plan must be submitted with the final plat along with a $2,000 bond to assure completion of the landscape. 4. All day care center staff must meet County and State license requirements. 5. The hours of operation shall be from 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M., Mondav-Friday. DO/jach M I I — � Ij � Lorl I block =-TEXT U I on I P'L_DT K1106 'AsiglTs FIS 4ocl"� j �a N I w I a p,�?-JED�� i "NORTH m ' 86 Ott 3 10x5 1.1-11- �P1�IM -1 EPLIVI CONSTRUCTION 7 0. INC. 110 WEST Cou - 8060 C INT PALL. NINN650 T6 5511] 16111 616-6150 1 DATE 4/8/81 J �qGq� —PCFsl I CHR+ fH?ALSIC4 0 I I I I Ram aLi 11 Al&'L LL'( �1iF roil ;F ELr�� I -.^. j '-!ZG •-� i Til-�1ry i --. _ ::.: �IN�� • CARE CRI -q Zl rAC LALM y. IG6�wra� LwEF �-• .�.�...-urs...= - - - �.._�.-.�_...-..:� i �1M �MINGIt� � Sn��N I .. Je° cox p�rwav� _.� ' PawFh Poor VEi.11lL^rtm ! - A / .fyl�-�evE L+I 122 AenY.l� 1I �" 7 Sa'F� r S�si81 i t r r� 9 11 r 31 Ff- \rte-dx cin slue c..•rwoi 7, fl LA i -JeAw PH ED 11 I F ]IL9, 91 P-1 EIP ALVMIN 'A./.k4I} - Jr 11 r 31 Ff- \rte-dx cin slue c..•rwoi 7, fl LA i -JeAw PH ED 11 I F ]IL9, 91 P-1 EIP ALVMIN 'A./.k4I} - I MENDWA iA v - it RB I. llfllfl ` v � .J GB • ---- L�,. GOLF COMMS ._i� '.� h. d -:/ 1 �.w '� r,✓ PLANNED DE R Ind PE RII RIII '•Ind _ HlGB 7- 1 RE vA �,.—_ Ind •�/ �� >/ © C, t �i !f In ' •, •rte - // / LEO Rdll q : .. R-111 R -III R-11 I,, RII _ _R d. P -` ,.i._I -R-II— e RII L . R- IQi j' C V�. LB RIII' R I , -���• / ��li/ fY. -. �,w'.I R -II - —P %�.,. RIII .�. R E .r) - ..R.II `RI �p.(�j __R -II _ .+ R 9� - / HALL R-111II _. . _ r, .• ' . 1 P CRY R -I RII p_ R-1 +.7•; ,-.�;�, ,rlERh�. '' -•-R-11 Q �� � ��� P,� R-11 •.^P•� i II �'• R -II R -II i �LB 4 I M ...—• �_ nn E P � - . -olll +� R^:II -' N LRt�7� �� . j - ,' RBy- �! tl�j ` R -III R -III CSC/GB/LB R I R -III R- R -I. R -III �' ! RI. �_.-��_ R -II P ,y.i�L-CJ, z, E 'I� ! D CSC P R -II -' I .a: •,r. o ..,. ; ;�� R -II RII P� •• � �-. R -II P NB R r .. LB R -III LE3sc DLB ,. RB LB -_� r�R I P ; ; I iI,R_1 �j R I pR-1 '.;10 couX rr .r P R -I R -II QP RII GOLF w0 I%I RA _ �- v R -II • R -II q !c7 c,. �._➢ P �, .ter-•_�-> r;'z; �• ;--�� .,,! _ cis -! APPLE .ALLEY r` D I 1'�Rt SEMOUNeP %/ i B R-4 csc L CAR ry R T114 -3 cou WOOD LB RAILS R-4 N sf R 4 2, R-4 s Q _ l 1 A woo P -*z -R-1 R-1 CITY AL PF"' Rl I R -i ES OTT; R A K PF WtN D GZT. K A D 2 R i PD 'NiYall74-1 A ci cn PF 0 Z p 0 -R-3 p NB R A A 0 PI -R.TIPI 0 0 TO: CHAIRPERSON JOE HARRISON AND ADVISORY PLANNING CCtM'IISSION mRMERS FROM: DAVE OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT DATE: DEMMER 7, 1981 RE: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR KINDER CARE PROPOSAL IN PILOT KNOB HEIGHTS At the request of the Advisory Planning Commission, I have researched the activities which have taken place since the original Pilot.Knob Heights Planned Development was approved on December 12, 1974. This information is important in that the Commission members can now have a better understand- ing of the status of land in which Nr. Nordlund is proposing a Kinder Care Center. On December 11, 1979, the Advisory Planning Canmission gave preliminary plat approval to use this land in accordance with the original planned development proposal for an office complex. There were several questions raised at the meeting concerning the ponding area in the lot. It was pointed out that this pond would act as a sedimentation trap and as an emergency outlet into the storm sewer system. It was also stated that drainage would be further fil- tered before any excess water overflows into the storm sewer system. A ques- tion was raised by a resident as to the capabilities of Blackhawk lake hand- ling an excess storm drainage. Public Wbrks Director Colbert acknowledged that the proposed development would add to the problem and that the City is studying the problem. There was also a concern over the capacity of Fish Lake for additional storm drainage. Since this meeting, Public Works Director Colbert had prepared a report on the drainage capacity of Fish and Blackhawk lakes dated February, 1980. Copies of the report were distributed to the Plan- ning Commission and City Council explaining the projects being constructed to handle the proposed runoff. On January 5, 1980, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for the Pilot Knob Office Park. On March 26, 1981, staff received a letter from the developer, Ken Applebaum, requesting a one-year extension for the preliminary plat of the Pilot Knob Office Park. A copy of this letter is attached. The City Council granted a one-year extension to the preliminary plat for the Pilot Knob Office Park on July 7, 1981. At the September 29, 1981 Annual Planned Development Review, the City learned that there had been no further progress on the Pilob Knob Office Park. Since September 29, 1981, Ken Applebaum has donated a portion of the lot in question to a charity for construction of a Kinder Care Center. Because of unfavorable economic conditions, there are no further plans for the office com- plex in the lot. DO/jack NOTE: Staff has reviewed the ponding problems to date associated with the lot in which the Kinder Care is to be built. Attached to this memo is a site plan of the once proposed office canplex and the future shopping center. Staff has determined that the pond to the northeast of the proposed Kinder Care location has the capacity to handle the storm drainage from the Kinder Care site. W RA R E I L • • (612) 432.8131 REALTORS auiwn• 1000 EAST 146th STREET • SUITE 220 • BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 MEMBER "MLS' . . . REAL ESTATE . . . MORTGAGE INSURANCE May 26, 1981 Mr. Thomas Hedges.. City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: .I received a letter from Kurtis G. Ulrich, a planning assistant working for the City of Eagan. He put me on notice that the preliminary plan of the Pilot Knob Office Park was coming up for renewal. Because of the mortgage market being what it it, which means there is absolutely no money available for this project in the mortgage money market, I would appreciate it very much if you would give this project a year's extension. Maybe if I am lucky, sometime within the next year the mortgage money available for projects like this will be funded again. In the event that there are any questions about my re- quest, please feel free to call me. Thank you again for your efforts for the extension. Yours very truly, MARREL`L`,` INC. Kenneth Appelbaum KA/jww cc: Kurtis G. Ulrich 93 tJ�AY 2'i j�61 0 0 TO: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. PINKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1981 RE: PRELIMItURY PLAT - KINDER CARE ADDITION (RICHARD NORDLUND) At the Advisory Planning Ccrm-Lission Meeting of Noverrber 24, 1981, there was concern pertaining to the proposed elimination of the ponding area that was proposed to be incorporated as a part of the previous Pilot Knob Office Park proposal. This ponding area was meant to provide a sedimentation basin for the surface water run off from the parking areas of the proposed Pilot Knob Office Park conplex. Its location in the southeast corner (Kinder Care proposed site location) was based on the matter of convenience due to existing topography and terrain of the property in question. This major outlet is proposed to be directed to the north and east into a series of ponds to be located adjacent to Duckwood Drive north of the Hidden Oaks Townhouse omplex. These Duck - wood Drive drainage ponds have been constructed as a part of the site grading for the Pilot Knob Shopping Center ccrrplex. During this grad- ing, the staff insured that excess capacity was made available in the pond proposed to be located in Lot 17 of the Pilot Kncb Shopping Cen- ter plat. This excess capacity aunbined with a small sedimentation pond to be located somewhere within the Pilot Knob Office Park PUD pro- perty will be more than adequate to provide the required storm water detention system that would be required from its development. The location of this sedimentation pond within the Pilot Knob Office Park PUD property is not a critical factor. This is due to the fact that is meant to be a sedimentation pond and is not meant to provide excessive storm water storage volumes. Once these ponds have been con- nected, they will have a positive gravity storm sewer outlet all the way to the Minnesota River through the Fish Lake and Blackhawk Izke drainage basins. In sumrary, the proposed location of the Kinder Care Center would re- quire a relocation of the previously proposed sedimentation pond to the north. This will not have any detrimental effect on grading, drainage and/or erosion. I will be available to answer further questions pertaining to this information at the Planning Camussion Meeting of December 22, 1981. Respectfully submitted,, / Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Ttbrks U11 the M/nn*Dpo/n r(5_d*roDon for Jewish Service LA SALLE COURT, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 • PHONE 339-7491 December 29, 1981 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Manager City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road St. Paul, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: Mr. Robert C. Fors of Midwest Builders Realty, has informed the Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service of the discussions which have taken place at the recent meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Eagan. As a result of our conversation with Mr. Fors, I would like to take this opportunity to provide you with some information which should be helpful in this matter. On December 26, 1980, Kenneth and Sally Appelbaum, Robert H. and Naomi R. Karatz, of Phoenix, Arizona contributed a piece of property located in Eagan described as: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Pilot Knob Heights First Edition, lying Westerly of the West Line of Outlot G and its Southernly extension thereof, and lying Easterly of the Plat of First Minnehaha Edition, according to the recorded plat thereof, on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Dakota County, Minnesota. This contribution was made by the families mentioned above, and equally divided between the Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service and the Jewish Federation of Greater Phoenix. Each of these charitable institutions are appropriately registered within their own States, and are recognized as 501-C-(3) institution by the Internal Revenue Service. For your information, such contributions of land to charitable institutions are not unusual and are consistent with similar contributions that are made regularly to such institutions as Catholic Charities, various churches, the University of Minnesota, and other charitable and non-profit institutions. Both families have a long record of philanthropic contributions to the Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service as well as Mr. Karatz's contributions to the Jewish Federation of Greater Phoenix after moving his residence from Minnesota to Arizona. Each of these contributions have been placed in the respective Endowment Funds of each of the Federations. C = _ [, 2 Morris M. Sherman, President — Judy Goldenberg, Sheldon Levin, Stephen E. Lieberman, Frank Trestman, Vice Presidents — Stanley Schweitzer, Treasurer — Morton Silverman, Financial Secretary — Rove Rosenbloom, Secretary CONI The Officers and Theresa Berman, Corrinre Birnberg, Thomas D. Feinberg, William Goldenberg, Mike Kunin, Shells Lieberman, Julius 1 T T FE. Rivkin, Susie Selcer, Richard Spiegel, David Weinberg Herman S. Markowitz—Ek ecutive Director, Mitchel Lazarus—Associate Director for Planning & Budgeting, Jay Jacobson—Campaign Director 96 0 0 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Manager -2- December 29, 1981 City of Eagan Marel Realty was asked to assist in the sale of the land in order for the Endowment Funds to have those resources available for the philanthropic purposes of each of the institutions involved. Mr. Appelbaum, who is involved in the real estate business, was authorized by the Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service to assist in the obtaining of an extension of the Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) and the preliminary plan for the real estate in question. At no time has Mr. Appelbaum acted without the authorizationor knowledge of the Federation concerning this property. It is our understanding that the zoning for this property is consistent with the use, as requested, by the Kinder Kare, Inc. The realtor representing Kinder Kare, Inc., has informed the Federation that there was no variance requested of the Planning Commission for the use of this property. The intent of the Federation is to be sure that this transfer to Kinder Kare, Inc., is handled in a business like and legal fashion. If there are any questions that you may have, please feel free to call. Thanking you in advance for your consideration. HSM:mav cc: Morris Sherman, Esq., President Robert C. Fors, Builders Realty Since^ ly yours, T Herman S. Markowitz, Executive Director 97 0 0 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FR3M: PLANNING ASSISTANT OSBERG DATE: JANUARY 14, 1982 RE: KINDER CARE FACILITY PP=MINARY PLAT At the December meeting of the Advisory Planning Carmission, a motion was passed reoamending denial of the preliminary plat application for a Kinder Care day care center. The reasons for denying the application are outlined in the minutes of the December meeting. Since that time, staff has received several informational items from the applicant that may provide the City Council with a better understanding of the Kinder Care situation. The Advisory Planning Commission expressed a concern regarding the ownership of the lot in question. The lot is a part of the Pilot Knob Office Park which was given preliminary plat approval by the City Coun- cil on January 5, 1980. City Planner Runkle has received a letter since the December 1981 APC meeting explaing what has transpired with the Kinder Care lot. Apparently, the previous owner, Ken Applebaum, has donated the land to the Minneapolis Federation For Jewish Service, who has sold the land to Kinder Care for use as a day care center. The re- maining parcel of land has also been donated by Mr. Applebaum to the Minneapolis Federation For Jewish Service. There are still plans for constructing the office complex on the remaining land once the Kinder Care facility is constructed. Staff has explained to the interested individuals that if the Kinder Care facility is constructed, this would not be in compliance with the original preliminary plat of the Pilot Knob Office Park. Due to this inconsistency, the City Council may re- quire a revised site plan of the Pilot Knob Office Park once the appli- cant seeks to begin construction of the office canplex. The applicant has submitted a site plan illustrating how the office oerrplex could be incorporated with the Kinder Care facility. In essence, the applicants want to proceed with the Kinder Care facility now and the necessary procedure will be followed once the office cmplex is built. Another concern of the Advisory Planning Commission was the proposed location of a ponding area on the site. The original preliminary plat for the Pilot Knob Heights Office Park had a ponding area located where the Kinder Care facility is proposed. Public Works Director Colbert submitted a metro to the Advisory Planning Commission for its December meeting explaining the ponding situation in the Pilot Knob Office Park. Apparently the location of Kinder Care facility would require a reloca- tion of the ponding area, and this would present no major problem. To summarize, it appears as if the transfer of ownership of land has been carried out properly. The applicants are hoping to construct the Kinder Care facility first and then deal with the office car>plex. There are no problems with the relocation of the ponding area. CYO/jack 94 APC Minutes December 22, 1981 KINDER CARE DAY CARE CENTER - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of Kinder Care and Richard Nordlund for preliminary plat and conditional use permit for day care center on a part of Lot 1, Block 1, Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition was next convened by the Chairman. Mr. Robert Fors, a Realtor, was present for the applicant. A number of neighboring property owners were present and objected to the location of the proposal noting that in 1980 an application for preliminary plat on the lot provided for a ponding area in that location. The Planning Commission members discussed in detail and had questions about the application including Doris Wilkins who asked whether Kenneth Applebaum in May of 1981, who requested an extension of time for approval of preliminary plat was auth- orized to do so. It was noted that the owner of the property as of December 1980, were the Minneapolis Jewish Federation and Phoenix Jewish Federation, according to Quit Claim Deeds granted to those two organizations. There were also objections as to the location of the building and as to whether the use as a Day Care Center was premature for the area. There were also concerns about how the balance of the lot will be developed, noting the preliminary plat originally submitted did not provide for a building in this location. Wilkins moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend denial of the applica- tion for the following reasons: 1. It does not comply with the plan submitted by the then owner when the preliminary plat application was approved in 1980. 2. That there appears to be a technical defect in the extension of the original preliminary plat by Mr. Applebaum. 3. The location of the pond is uncertain at the present time, noting that location for the Kinder Care was the original location for the pond. 4. It is necessary to review the entire lot for development purposes, rather than only a portion of the lot for to determine the use of the balance of the lot. All voted in favor except Krob who voted no. Wilkins then moved and Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of the conditional use permit. All voted in favor. 2 q9 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Thirteen I.R. FINANCING - KINDER CARE B. Richard Nordlund for the Scheduling of a Public Hearing to Consider Industrial Revenue Financing in the Amount of $325,000 for Kinder Care -- The City has received an application from Kinder Care Learning Centers requesting industrial revenue financing for the Kinder Care facility outlined in the last agenda item. The application is requesting industrial revenue financing in the amount of $325,000. The minimum size defined on the application for in- dustrial revenue financing is $500,000. Apparently, Kinder Care Learning Center has included the land in the requested industrial revenue financing amount, and, therefore, the $325,000 would be reduced by the $40,000 to $285,000. Kinder Care Learning Centers is specifically requesting a variance to the $500,000 policy. Enclosed on page 101 is a letter from First Corporate Services, Inc., who is han i.ng the application for Kinder Care Learning Centers. The City Administrator would not allow this item on the agenda until the preliminary plat and conditional use permit items acted on by the APC were heard by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny setting a public hearing to consider industrial revenue financing for Kinder Care Day Care Center, and if approved, the public hearing would be -set for the February 16, 1982 meeting. X00 0 FIRST CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. INVESTMENT BANKERS SUITE 206, 822 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 16121 332.0955 November 24, 1981 Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor and City Council: 0 On behalf of Kinder -Care Learning Centers, I am requesting that the City Council wave its minimum of $500,000 for Commercial Revenue Bond financing. This particular project will only cost $325,000 but the value to the residence and business community of Eagan will be substantial. Kinder -Care Learning Centers operate in 35 states and have approximately 735 day care centers. They are publicly held and the undisputed leader in providing quality day care. One of their new concepts, which they will be introducing in the proposed Eagan facility, is Kindustry. This plan was designed to aid industry in solving some of the serious problems encountered with absenteeism and employee loss because of the lack of industry's ability to alleviate the child care problem. The annual report I have enclosed further discusses this concept. The Education Department at Kinder -Care is continually up grading their programs and assisting the staff at every center with workshops and in-house training. Quality has taken on a very important meaning at Kinder -Care. I would like to have the opportunity to have Donna Goff the Midwest Director discuss the importance of day care in your community, and to explain how Kinder - Care would fit into your local situation. Donna will be available at the public hearing, or at anytime the council may wish her to be available for discussion. If the council would lend its support to this project thru the issuance of Indurstrial Revenue Bond financing, I think the community would benefit from this much needed service. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, FIRST_,CORPOPLATE SERVICES, INC. Richard J. Nordlund RJN/pka Enc . /01 Ll Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Fourteen 40, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR KNOB HILL C. Edmund B. Dunn of Blackhawk Park Associates for Rezoning from A to PD to Include Limited Business, Townhouse and Condominium Development and for a Preliminary Plat Approval of Knob Hill, Consisting of 40 Acres -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the November 24, 1981 meeting, and due to a continuance, was again considered at the December 22, 1981 APC meeting. The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 40 acres from A to PD containing approxi- mately 10.5 acres of LB and 19.7 acres of residential which would consist of 84 condiminium units and 102 townhouse units. The second application submitted is a request for a preliminary plat consisting of approximately 40 acres and containing eleven lots of which five lots are proposed for limited business use and six lots are proposed for residential development. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval, of the rezoning and preliminary plat sub- ject to the conditions outlined in the attached minutes. For addi- tional information on this item, refer to the City Planner's report, a copy of which is enclosed on pages IoS through //+ . For additional information, please refer to a memo addresse y the City Planner, a 'copy of which is enclosed on pages //S' through For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of t ose minutes enclosed on pages (1 through Also enclosed on pages 11,0 through IZZ is an updated repor on the proposed preliminary report of Knob Mill as prepared by the City Planner. This information should provide supplementary data to the report which was prepared for the Advisory Planning Commission meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the recom- mendation of the Advisory Planning Commission to approve the Knob Hill preliminary plat and rezoning. Special Note: Enclosed without a page number is a copy of an infor- mational booklet on the proposed Knob Hill Addition. 107- 0 SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: APPLICATION SUBMITTED; CITY OF EAGAN REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT - KNOB HILL OF EAGAN EDMUND B. DUNN, BLACKHAPIK PARK ASSOCIATES SE4 OF THE SES OF SECTION 21 A (AGRICULTURAL) NOVA BER 24, 1981 NOVEMBER 19, 1981 DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 40 acres from A (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development District) containing approximately 10.5 acres of LB (Limited Business District) and 19.7 acres of residential which would consist of 84 condominium units and 102 townhouse units. The second application submitted is a request for a preliminary plat consisting of approximately 40 acres and will contain 11 lots of which 5 lots are proposed for Limited Business use and 6 lots are proposed for residential development. LAND USE AND ZONING Presently, the parcel is zoned A (Agricultural District) The land use plan desig- nates the parcel as LB (Limited Business District) in the eastern h of the proposed development. The land use designation on the western half of the development is R-2 (mixed residential) with a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed residential development has a net density of approximately 9 dwelling units per acre which would fit the R-3 land use designation according to the land use plan which is mixed residential with a density between 6 and 12 dwelling units per acre. If this development proposal is approved, the City would have to amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan to change this R-2 land use designation to an R-3 land use designation going through the amendment process with the Metropolitan Council. As you may recall, some of this development is tied into the Blackhawk Park Planned Development. Within the past few years, there has been a land use designation change from Blackhawk Park Planned Development to this particular parcel. The land use change was to eliminate LB (Limited Business) zoning which was proposed in the Blackhawk Park Planned Development south of Countv Road 30 and east of Thomas Lake Road. This land use change was transferred to the area north of County Road 30 and west of Pilot Knob Road. The proposed development plan has incorporated this pro- posed change in the site work and development preparation of the Knob Hill prelimi- nary plat. The only portion in the overall plat which would be in question is the 17 acres designated for residential developnent. As mentioned earlier, this has been designated on the Comprehensive Guide Plan as R-2 (mixed residential) with a /0 3 C� C CITY OF EAGAN KNOB HITS, OF EAGAN NOVEMBER 24, 1981 PAM 'M density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. This particular development will consist of a net density of 9 dwelling units per acre which is a higher density than desig- nated on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The overall plat contains 11 lots and street right-of-way designation. In review- ing the overall plat, it appears the right-of-way for County Road 31, or Pilot Knob Road, is proposed for 55'. This would be adequate for the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. The right-of-way of 55' should also be dedicated on Lot 5, Block 2 of Knob Hill preliminary plat. The right-of-way for County Road 30 will be 155' north of the existing centerline of County Road 30. The reason for this additional right-of-way is that the County is proposing to shift the alignment of County Road 30 to the north because of the grades of the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and County Road 30. The applicant has not shown this 155' right-of-way dedication on the preliminary plat. It is the'staff's understanding that the applicant wishes to have the County acquire this excess right-of-way instead of dedicating the entire 1551. It is staff's un- derstanding that the applicant is revising the preliminary plat which will be ready for the public hearing to show the 155' as an outlot in order to preserve the right- of-way for the upgrading of County Road 30 and Pilot Knob Road. The outlot would still be in the ownership of the Dunn Company and the Dunn Company would expect the County to purchase the additional right-of-way required. SITE PLAN REVIEW LAND USE ACREAGE BUILDING COVERAGE MQUIRED PARKING PMPOSED PARKING Townhouse 14.5 18.4% 255 255 Condo/Apt. 5.1 14.5% 210 96 Office 10.22 19.0% 1,062 1,070 - Note: The proposed outside parking spaces for the townhouse development would include the individual driveways. The driveways should be set back at least 20' from all setbacks or drives. - Note: The parking for the condominium space and 1'h open parking space! ed 210 parking spaces. development requires 1 covered parking . The developer is short of the requir- - Note: The parking spaces for the offices on the original site plan illustrates 1,070 spaces. With the outlot for additional right-of-way would remove 67 parking spaces. Therefore, there is a net deficit of 59 parking spaces for the overall office complex. - Note: The required square footage for the condominium project with the 21 one - bedroom, 42 two-bedroom and 21 -three bedroom would require 6.4 acres. The net area proposed is 5.1 which gives a deficit of 1.3 acres. 104 L CITY OF EAGAN KNOB HILL OF EAGAN NOVEMBER 24, 1981 PAGE THREE In reviewing the overall site plan, it appears all setbacks for buildings are met with the exception of the spacing between the townhouse units at the "L" locations. These setbacks should be increased to 301. The parking for the office corrplex as stated earlier will have to be relocated and a 20' green area shall be provided between any public street and the parking lot. If approved, the preliminary plat and planned developrrent shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. Outlots shall be established on the plat for the additional right-of-way which is to be acquired by Dakota County for the upgrading of County Road, Diffley Road. 2. The plat shall be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comnent because the plat abuts two County roads. 3. A planned development agreement and development agreerent shall be completed prior to the starting of the lst Addition. The planned development agreement shall not exceed a 5 -year term. 4. A homeowner's association by-laws shall be reviewed by the City for each phase of development. 5.- A staging plan shall be required to determine how the area is to be developed. 6. A detailed landscape plan shall be provided with each phase and a landscape bond for an adequate amount shall be required for each final phase of the de- velopment. 7. The development shall require all the parking spaces that have been stated in the planner's report under required parking unless otherwise approved by the City Council. 8. The plat shall be subject to the Park Committee's recommendations and commnts for park dedication on the proposed development. 9. The developer shall re -design the parking layouts on Lot 7, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3 in order to provide for the additional parking spaces required. 10. All other City ordinances shall be applicable to the overall develorinent plan. DCR/jach P CITY OF EAGAN KNOB HILL OF EAGAN NOVEMBER 24, 1981 PAGE FOUR 0 ENGINEERING RECOnMET MTIONS 11. A 55' half right-of-way must be dedicated adjacent to County Road 31 and a 155' half right -o£ -way must be dedicated adjacent to County Road 30. 12. A ponding and drainage easement must be dedicated providing for a high water elevation of 886.0 and/or 5.0 acre feet of storage capacity for the drainage basin referenced as DP -27. 13. A detailed grading and drainage plan must be submitted for formal approval prior to final plat application. 14. All easements required by the installation of an internal utility distri- bution system shall be dedicated as a condition of final plat approval. 15. This property shall accept the additional assessments associated with the upgrading of the zoning of this property for trunk area utilities. It shall also agree to acceptance of the future assessments associated with the upgrading of County Road 30 and 31. 16. An 8' bituminous trailway shall be constructed within a 10' strip outside of the anticipated future dedication of public right-of-way along County Road 30 and County Road 31. TAC/jach /O6 0 0 TO: ADVISORY PLANNING CODM4ISSIO.V, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1981 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - KNOB HILL OF EArAN (THE DUNN COMPANY) The Public [+brks Department has the following items to be considered by the Planning Commission for their review of the proposed above -referenced pre- liminary plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and watermain of sufficient size and capacity is available adjacent to this property to provide the required service anticipated by this proposed development. The property generally slopes to the north and west towards the existing drainage basins located in the north central portion of this proposed plat. These drainage basins presently have existing storm sewer outlet available which provides positive storm sewer drainage from this site to the Minnesota River by way of the Blackhawk Lake trunk storm sewer which has recently been completed. All drainage generated from this plat will be conveyed by way of an internal storm sewer system into these internal drainage basins prior to discharging into the referenced storm sewer system which is located in the northwest corner of this plat. A detailed grading plan has not been submitted. There appears to be some minor grade differentials created along the westerly boundary and the north- east corner that will require slope easements frau the adjacent property aa- ners based on preliminary spot elevations submitted on their preliminary grading plan. Based on these proposed spot elevations, it appears that the maximum grade of any street located within this proposed plat would not ex- ceed 5% which is well within the subdivision ordinance requirements. SITE PLAN The proposed layout of the internal public streets takes into consideration the separation between the commercial and residential uses of this property in addition to the differential in the topographv elevations between the southeast corner and the northwest corner of this property. Knob Drive, which provides the internal access for the proposed commercial use of this property, has its northerly entrance opposite Berry Ridge Road at its inter- section with Pilot Knob Road. This is in conformance with the proposed major intersection access north of the future intersection of Pilot Knob Road with Diffley Road. The southerly intersection of Knob Drive with County Road 30 is approximately 480' west of the intersection of the two County roads in the ,southeast corner. This is adequate for future improvements to County Road 30 in addition to maintaining adequate site distance for this intersection. 0% 0 0 Engineering Report - Knob Hill of Eagan November 24, 1981 Page two Knob Lane has its proposed intersection lined up with the existing Heine- Strasse Road and provides for a continuation through the property adjacent to and westerly of this proposed plat. Until such time as Knob Lane can be continued to the west, there is adequate room for maintenance vehicles to turn around with the proposed location of the private drives in the north- west corner of this plat. EASE=S AND RIGHTS-0F-WhY A 55' half right-of-way must be dedicated adjacent to County Road 31 to pro- vide for the future upgrading of Pilot Knob Read. 14hen County Road 30 is upgraded in the future, its present intersection with County Road 31 will be relocated approximately 80' north of this existing location. This will require the dedication of a 155' half right-of-way adjacent to County Road 30 to provide for this proposed future relocation of County Road 30 to the north. Internal easements necessary for a utilitydistribution system will have to be determined upon the final detail design of this system. Upon completion of that design, the required easements will be dedicated as a part of the final plat. A ponding easement must be dedicated around the internal ponding areas of sufficient dimension to incorporate the 886.0 high water elevation and/or 5.0 acre feet of storage capacity above the 882.0 controlled water elevation provided by the existing storm sewer outlet for this drainage basin. ASSESSMENTS This property has previously been assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer assessments. However, it was assessed at the existing Agricultural zoned use. With the proposed development of this property to its anticipated zoning, the difference in trunk area assessments should be collected as a condition of preliminary plat approval. In addition, lateral benefit from trunk sanitary sewer will have to be assessed based on benefit received of the existing trunk sanitary sewer located adjacent to the west property line. Lateral benefit from trunk water will have to be assessed due to benefit received from the existing trunk watermain located within County Road 30 adjacent to the southerly boundary of this proposed plat. In addition to these referenced assessments, this property will be responsible for all costs associated with providing internal lateral utility distribu- tions to service this plat. In addition, a condition of the development agreement should provide for the acceptance of future assessments associated with the upgrading of County Road 30 and/or County Road 31. I will be available to discuss in further detail any questions associated with this plat at the Planning Commission Meeting of November 24, 1981. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. 108 Director of Public Works TAC/jack ^ 26 UNIT BLOCK R •� L UVJ LOT 3 . 30 11T . I �R-\ ■ OK 2 %•! L B BLOCK MOT 5 • i Ili : • - i 2 • I I 1 �. • •�• O . • I I1.111u • Y _ / • i i i •• _ 7.000 .F. 1 22 UNITS • BLOC 2/LOT 6 i �-3 BLOCK 2 •.•`• `� j. - J� ' LOT 2 : P •• ••,••' •••• • OO • �� E i • i _ �I3ISTORY III BLOCK 2/LOT j 48 UNITS IlI� lllil� it •• BLOCK 2 - •- ii�4 • LOTI COUNTY 30 A�i�'Y_en ;r5 E • Ll NOTES 1 uv^.w ec vc uLrt r.+.cLmpupf n� acc•+¢m soe -I !- DUNN QF AL FST>TQ .r NpNA44MQNT INC COUNTY ROAD 30 (WILD WOOD LANE) � N Iv I C C� -.-,...�-._-.._._.:. Sd GQ6UMINpQY R4T •-• _: a/r/O �r.4-.-. .,ay.s .vsa. ss«�,u i.c KNOB HILL 110 acc•+¢m soe -I !- DUNN QF AL FST>TQ .r NpNA44MQNT INC .._..•��...e —..—c .EGEND. vc._ rm.o.c .,ar,c M. --"•_ •• ••-•• ,�• � ••• >—��rtTy .ueaw�rcer w.rce ' _--_ ' `,, _� // `�. �...• ee aa.r,e�I. �'/ me w, Z RDA II I�V , �� .~ % /%f� �� � ��/ � � .ice ..� -� /•.I� _' j °I IIS _ .W'/,�� _ � � �./ � /'/•1u � I^Ir .J . q, P l ��� / I m P.nm ��}• _ •N LOIJNTY ROAD 30 WILD WOOD LAN ) to •yV,T. - S®�[wn �RELIMINAQY &R4DIN4 AND •DRAINA" MANI: `•• 1-1V ,'LY coe •-• , ✓M .•••c w w.ssoc+ c..c KNOB WILL .. �• ---- MANN CESTATE .rte .,r. .. r.+.. _._._. MANAbEMZMENT INL (A � _�� .fir`" ';/;�,'--,�,,•'; - ^- rr /` -- \1'� e� /''- /i /�///•/ •tel \ B•�/-,_�D RD 6Y \� �/ III '� ' /' / V :./� � •Y^ Z QOAD 3 I , r i o / NMI - 0/ • _-- �� 94, .__ .—.__ _.. ... —_:. i,.,. Y`•M•+ -1- LOUNTY ROAD 30 (WILD WOOD LANE)-_-- LZ� -.... _.. .,..°:':::: ..:...... ...... _- W r Oto L C, iQ6LIMINAQY UTILITIES ULAN v¢cra¢ca cp¢ J KNOB WILL DUNN Q6GIN . r.;fd .11!11 ®�'_�_.._ �....._. � .v. a ,ru. w •:., MANA66M�NT ING � 3 112 6 �� •1.. S -1 _ / „�'; RB" IInd GB -�• i--- 1 i .. .; GOLF • _ ••� 1'--� _ h Z. Indy ,�.y� ,. NONIMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT R.I• L:_::� Ind 1. S ..;e. 'I' I �Ii Ind .- v Ind `G.B' II Y ~RII In'- _!•• "°' `-. " _ � R8� R IV R III I •_ •� I, _ \\ Ra ,/� RI, D cl '. Inc Ind. ' NB �g°� R-01 P RIII �/i -� r v ' RII l'R-II—. D' - ' j'�,� i�� _ — . � ��nd L�-11 --- '• CSC a,RI:,..0 GOLF F ROW ro ®[L.Bj RIII R-I o ,R-i[7 , / R II P. ..Ind �'_ o RIII :.r, y 'n R'I - 'RII f .:RIS R-1 r R-II�q R-11 -R-11 P ' -III J- R1 LB N Tr, �:,: II . E T..:� NB 1• ". R-III RB i R-1111 7 ' `: �" -- CSC/GB R-III RIII R-III RII .• R-II R-III- ;- LCJE, �IIi. P r71 , P / P P RII T 2' w, R-II R-11 '�P i 1 �' I, •_ -. R-1 RI P ,,,� l -- \Cpp SC 3' c PI(' i IS R-1 12 R 1 R-1 P GOLF `•>, c�au,v ` P T i... w R-II DPR-II _\,IJ 1'.b . r•-. - .. `I`..�I Ra R:II ::.--- yy r ..P l irn, ALLEY ��3 "r ? P F 77-2 A A �;p�� K Y-i�'H R _ —A J�coY 47 R -1c ----T--- _ �-R -A R_i p i + HII_'_ANDALE �j-Z i� ; Y A AR1 r4.. . / A o / / J 3D - a jP -3 �. 3'6 a / ° ' F R R B I a/ ao NR , R-3 RiB PF 73 oc, E - tT OT Q y ' THOMAS I' I � �� l v A 3 HEIGHrt� �} R FF �T ri I y 1 1 O L k .T4JU E MFNT ..1.. r� mPF tNrriA. J'' 'WIL-� PK tyg�p. ,1 yyq y S A FA R I � 1� ~' Is I EAGAN . "„I - — r1: w 1 R -I R-1 0 0 TO: JOE HARRISON, CHAIRPERSON AND THE ADVISORY PLANNING COWISSION FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: DEC0�BER 17, 1981 RE: INFORMATION REGARDING KNOB HILL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT At the November 24, 1981 Advisory Planning Commission Meeting, a number of ques- tions regarding Knob Hill Planned Development had surfaced. These questions are as follows: A. Revision of the Comprehensive Gide Plan - The Ccmorehensive Plan revision would be a short form which the City staff would fill out and submit to the Metropolitan Council. It is staff's understanding that this revision would not be determined significant and would require the process of approx- imately 30 days from the time the application has been submitted until the Metropolitan Council took action on the amendment to Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. It is staff's understanding that we were not to submit the re- vision but to inform you as to how the revision process would work. If the development plan as provided is approved, then staff would process the amendment to the Comprehensive Gide Plan. Staff, at this time, did not want to process the amendrent just to see if it would be approved or not. If the development proposal is approved, then it should be subject to approval of the amendment by the Metropolitan Council. B. Height Limitation - Staff has prepared a memo on height limitation which a meeting had been scheduled on December 3, 1981. This meeting was re- scheduled to December 17, 1981. Therefore, at this time, staff does not have a direction in regard to the height limitations within zoning dis- tricts in the City at this time. Hopefully, at the December 22, 1981 Ad- visory Planning Commission Meeting, there will be a recmmPndation from the Subcommittee in regard to height limitations in the City of Eagan. C. Determination of Right -of -Way with Dakota County on Difflev Road and Re - „mss unecrceu wird uaxota L-ounty regarcnng right-ot-way for Diffley Road. This right-of-way has been determined that the centerline of present Diff - ley Road will be shifted 80' to the north. The 80' plus a 75' half right- of-way for a portion of Diffley Road will be required with the plat. On Pilot Knob Road, there is also a 75' half right-of-way which will be re- quired for turn lanes for the intersection of Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road. It is staff's understanding that the developer has revised the de- velopment plan which will show the aligrvrents of Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road as required by the County. At the present time, staff does not have the exhibit to submit with this memo, but they will be provided at the December 22 APC Meeting. In regard to acquisition and dedication, it has been the policy that the developer will dedicate his fair share of roadway right-of-way. Therefore, staff will be requesting a dedication of approximately 75' on Difflev Road and 75' on Pilot Knob Road. The additional road right-of-way needed on Diffley Road will be platted as )1s r] APC Metro December 17, 1981 Page two 0 outlots and then will be able to be acquired by Dakota County. As stated earlier, these exhibits will be provided at the December 22, 1981 APC Meet- ing. D. Whether the housing should be retained as R-2 density rather than increased to an R-3 density - It is staff's understanding that the developer is reduc- ing the density of the development proposal. It is staff's understanding that approximately 20% of the units will be decreased in the residential portion of the plat. The locations of the buildings are not going to change or is the street alignment going to change within the plat. The developer is in the process of just reducing the number of [nits which he had origi- nally submitted. Again, these exhibits are being prepared and will be available at the December 22 APC Meeting. In regard to the revision of the density frtan R-2 to R-3 will be a philosophical discussion that the Ad- visory Planning Commission will have to look at and make a determination if they will allow either the R-2 or the R-3. The site plan in regard to elevations and locations of structure, the developer has taken into account the topography and the trees on the site. Therefore, the location of the buildings will not be changing; it will just be the number of units which will be allowed to make the project economically feasible. E. There was discussion concerninq the revision of the a uic lvvi ulWc.7l. .,(UaUL JU UL U1111CY t(j anQ Yl10r AnOO )1O a — Staff has reviewed the minutes to try to see if the proposed change in land use from the Neighborhood Business on Thomas Lake Road and County Road 30 was transferred to the NW quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and County Road 30. Staff has not been able to uncover any documentation in regard to this proposed change. However, a staff report dated June '79 referenced this change with the platting of Thomas Lake Heights. Therefore, staff will continue to check to see if they can uncover any documentation in regard to the land use change at this location. According to the 1974-75 Land Use Guide Plan, this plan indicated that the quadrant in the M1; of Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road was designated Limited Business as far back as 1974-75. The 1980 land Use Plan also de- signates this parcel as Limited Business. If this Limited Business desig- nation would be removed, staff would also have to go through the amendment process to change the land use in this particular area. F. The last concern was in reqard to the nark and ade- quare ror tnls raclllty - Since the November 24, 1981 APC Meeting, the preliminary plat, Knob Hill of Eagan, had been reviewed by the Advisory Park Ccatmittee. The Park Committee recommended that a cash dedication Per unit be made and that one tot lot be provided for the pre-schoolers within this neighborhood. The last recamTendation from the Park Committee was that the developer construct the trail along Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road in accordance with the overall Trail Plan for the City. There- fore, this consideration has already been taken care of by the Park Corr mittee. !/6 If any of you have any questions regarding this memorandum, or would like.addi- tional information that what the staff has provided or will be providing at the December 22, 1981 APC Meeting, please contact me at the City Hall. , r� APC Minutes December 22, 1981 KNOB HILL OF EAGAN - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The continued hearing regarding the application of Edmund B. Dunn of Blackhawk Park Associates to rezone approximately 40 acres from A (Agri- cultural) to PD (Planned Development) with 10.5 acres of limited business and 19.7 acres of residential acreage, together with application for preliminary plat with 11 lots with 5 lots for limited business and 6 lots residential, was next convened by Chairman Joe Harrison. Mr. Dunn was present as was Greg Frank of McCombs Knutson Engineers, Jack Boarman, Architect, and Barton Dunn. Mr. Dunn and Mr. Boarman explained the changes in the plan since the last hearing and also distributed a hand out dated December 15, 1981. Mr. Boarman stated that the right of way configuration for Diffley Road will be revised to accomodate the proposed widening of Diffley Road and that the balance of the area for the right of way will consist of outlots: The Developer indicated that he would expect to be credited against park contribution for construction of the trail, but later, stated that because of the policy of the City in and adjacent to commercial areas, that the developer would pay for the cost of the trail without a credit for park purposes. Mr. Boarman further stated that the request for a variance for 5 stories would not be made at the present time and further, that the developer is recommending 1.5 parking spaces per condominium unit, which is less than the 2.5 spaces required by ordinance. The housing density was of prime concern to the planning commission members and it is noted the density has been reduced from 9.4 dwelling units per acre to 7.7 dwelling units per acre. Mr. Boarman also stated that there is interest in acquiring or constructing two office buildings at the southeast corner of the property and the planning commission members were concerned about architec- tural uniformity of the office building. Mr. Dunn and Mr. Boarman stated that the developer would insist on architectural uniformity. Member Wilkins ex- pressed her opinion that the office buildings in the area were not conducive to the residential character of the neighborhood, including Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road, and also felt that the density was still too high. There was also discussion concerning private recreational areas within the development and the public and private streets shown on the plan. Mr. Runkle stated that 1.5 parking spaces per unit is too low for condominiums and 1.7 to 1.75 units per acre are more appropriate, which later amount was agreed upon by Mr. Dunn. There was also discussion on whether the neighborhood business district zoning had been moved from the Thomas Lake Road area to the northwest quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Diffley Roads, requiring further study. Mr. Boarman argued that for financial purposes, the density for condominiums is necessary and desirable. Krob moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application to rezone 40 acres from Agricultural to Planned Development, with 10.5 acres of limited business, and 19.7 acres of residential, including 60 condominium units and 93 townhouse units, pursuant to the following condi- tions: 1. A planned development agreement and development agreement shall be completed prior to the starting of the 1st Addition. The planned development agreement shall not exceed an 8 year term. 2. Homeowner's association articles and by-laws where applicable, shall be reviewed by the City for each phase of development. 3 IIS 0 0 APC Minutes December 22, 1981 3. A staging plan shall be required to determine how the area is to be developed. All voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no. Krob then moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application for preliminary plat according to the following conditions: 1. Outlots shall be established on the plat for the additional right of way which is to be acquired by Dakota County for the upgrading of County Road 30, Diffley Road. 2. The plat shall be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comment because the plat abuts two County roads. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be provided with each phase and a landscape bond amount approved by the City provided for each final phase of the development. 4. The development shall provide all the parking spaces that have been stated in the planner's report under required parking unless otherwise approved by the City Council, with staff to recommend to Council and Couuncil to approve the parking spaces per unit. 5. The plat shall be subject to the Park Committee's recommendations and comments for park dedication on the proposed development. 6. The developer shall re -design the parking layouts on Lot 7, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3 in order to provide for the additional parking spaces required. 7. All other City ordinances shall be applicable to the overall de- velopment plan. 8. All L B buildings shall be architecturally compatible. 9. That up to 75 foot half right of way shall be dedicated adjacent to County Road 31 and up to 75 foot half right of way shall be dedicated adja- cent to County Road 30, Diffley Road as finally requested by Dakota County with the balance of the proposed Diffley Road right of way in outlots. 10. A ponding and drainage easement shall be dedicated providing for a highwater elevation of 886.0 and/or 5.0 acre feet of storage capacity for the drainage basin referenced as DP -27- 11. A detailed grading and drainage plan shall be submited for formal approval prior to final plat application. 12. All easements required by the installation of an internal utility distribution system shall be dedicated as a condition of final plat approval. 4 IN APC Minutes December 22, 1981 13. The owners of the property shall accept the additional assessments associated with the upgrading of the zoning of this property for trunk area utilities. They shall also agree to acceptance of the future assessments asosciated with the upgrading of County Roads 30 and 31. 14. An 8 foot bituminous trailway shall be constructed within a 10 foot strip inside of the anticipated future dedication of public right of way along County Road 30, Diffley Road, and County Road 31, at the sole cost of the owner at the location finally determined by the City. All voted yes. KATHLEEN SCHWANZ — CONDITINAL USE PERMIT FOR BEAUTY PARLOR The hearing regarding the application of Kathleen M. Schwanz, of 4283 Stirrup Street for conditional use permit for beauty parlor in a residential district was then considered by the planning commission. Ms. Schwanz was present as was one objecting property owner who submitted a Petition indica- ting 25 homes with 18 contacts, 7 opposing, 5 approving and 6 with no opinion. There were concerns about traffic, alleged reduction in house values, possible danger to children with more traffic, etc. The commission members reviewed the ordinance restrictions on home occupation in a residential district. After discussion, Turnham moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of opeartion will be from 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. only. 2. The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. 3. Customer parking must be on site and limited to two (2) customer autombiles. 4. There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business. 5. There shall be no over the counter sale of merchandise. 6. The permit shall be granted on an annual basis. 7. All other applicable ordinances must be followed. All voted yes. j►9 5 •1 , TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 15, 1982 RE: REVISED SITE PLAN AND PRELIMNAM PLAT FOR KNOB HILL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT The public hearing for Knob Hill of Eagan Planned Development was held on November 24, 1981 and continued to December 22, 1981. The Advisory Planning Commission recommended approval of the Planned Development with several changes to be incorporated into the overall site plan. The major change in the site plan was a reduction in dwelling units in the town- house and condominium area. Therefore, the previous report is accurate in regard to land use and zoning. However, the comments and charts will change. The original plan submitted contained: ORIGINAL SITE PIAN LAND USE ACRES BLDG COVERAGE DVM =(', UNITS/ REQUIRED SQUARE FEET PARKDr. PROPOSED PARKING Townhouse 14.5 18.4% 102 DU 255 255 Condo/Apt 5.1 14.58 84 DU 210 96 Office 10.22 19.0% 205,700 SF 1,062 1,070 REVISED SITE PLAN Ouse 14.5 13.4% 93 DU 232 232 Condo/Apt 5.1 12.4% 60 DU 150 110 Office 10.2 19.8% 201,100 SF 1,070 1,070 In comparing the two site plans, the biggest change has occurred in the reduction of the condominiums and townhouse units. The applicant reduc- ed the condominiums by 24 units and has reduced the townhouses by 9 dwell- ing units. The overall net site density for the residential portion is 7.8 dwelling units per acre which is .5% higher than what would be allow- ed in an R-3, or a townhouse zoning district. The requirements presently for a townhouse district is 7.3 dwelling units per acre. The applicant has revised the LB (Limited Business District) by not requesting the 4 -story building which was in the original proposal. The applicant is proposing two 3 -story buildings, one 2 -story building and two 1 -story buildings for a total of 201,100 square feet. Therefore, there is a slight reduction in the square footage of office spaces presented in this plan. However, the building configuration remains somewhat the same. AZO Revised Site Plan for Knob Hill of Eagan January 15, 1982 Page two In reviewing the parking for the individual office buildings, the appli- cant has provided adequate parking for this site. However, the parking spaces may not line up directly with each building. Therefore, a cross easement should be provided to allow transfer of parking spaces from one building to the next. The :major issue is the applicant has provided the required parking spaces for the office buildings. In reviewing the site plan in general, the applicant has provided set- backs fran property lines and between buildings to =re into conformance of all other ordinance requirements. The preliminary plat: the appli- cant also has revised the preliminary plat to show the platting of Outlot A, B and C. Outlot A, B and C will be the new location of Diffley Road, or County Road 30, when the road is upgraded. The applicant is proposing, however, to dedicate the normal street dedications to the County with the plat. However, the excess, which is Outlot A, B and C, are platted as an outlot to be reserved for County Road 30, Diffley Road, to be pur- chased by the County at the time Diffley Road is upgraded. The last item staff would like to mention about this revised plan is that the condominium parcels proposed do not meet the 2.5 parking spaces per unit. In reviewing this proposal, it has been brought to staff's atten- tion a number of times that 2.5 parking spaces per condominium unit is in excess of what is really required to provide adequate parking for con- dominiums. In conversing with a nuTber of other cities, the other cities require a maximuam of 2 parking spaces per condominium unit, and in a study that had been completed in Apple Valley, it had been determined that 1.75 parking spaces per unit is more than adequate to provide the parking for condominiums. Therefore, if the City Council elects, there would be a variance from the 2.5 parking spaces per condominium unit to the 1.75 which is found to be an adequate number. However, the Council may elect to provide 2 parking spaces per unit which would be more than adequate parking for the 60 condominium dwelling units. This appears to be the major changes which have transpired from the original application sub- mittal to the requirements by the Advisory Planning Commission. Therefore, the revised documents have been reviewed by staff in accordance with the Planning Commission recommendations. If the preliminary plat and rezoning is approved, the development proposal shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. That a variance be granted on the condominium parking spaces from 2.5 parking spaces per unit to 1.75 parking spaces per unit. 2. The plat should be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission's re- view and content because the plat abuts two County Roads. 3. A planned development agreement and development agreement shall be completed prior to the starting of the 1st Addition. 4. The planned development agreement shall not exceed a 5 -year /ZI Revised Site Plan for Knob Hill of Eagan January 15, 1982 Page three 5. A homeowners' association and by-laws shall be reviewed by the City for each phase of the development. 6. A staging plan shall be required to determine how the area is to be developed. 7. A detailed landscape plan shall be provided with each phase and a landscape bond for an adequate amount shall be required for each final phase of the development. 8. The plat shall be subject to the Park Committee's recommendations and comments for park'dedication on the proposed development. 9. Cross easements shall be provided on the parking in the commercial areas to allow adequate parking for each building. 10. All other City ordinances shall be applicable to the overall de- velopment plan. DCR/jach 17-71 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Fifteen CONDITIONAL USE -PERMIT REQUEST - KATHLEEN SCHWANZ D. Kathleen M. Schwanz for a Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Bearty Shop in a Residential Area (Saddlehorn Addition) -- A public hearing was held to consider an application submitted to the City by Kathleen M. Schwanz for a conditional use permit to allow a beauty shop in a residential area located on Lot 5, Block 3, Saddle - horn Addition. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the conditional use permit subject to the conditions outlined in their minutes. For additional information on this item, please refer to the Planning Assistant's report found on pages _la4 through %'VFor a copy of the minutes regarding this agenda item, refer to page 110 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the recom- mendation of the APC to approve the conditional use permit to allow a beauty shop as applied for by Kathleen M. Schwanz. 125 0 CITY OF EAGAN 0 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A BEAUTY PARLOR IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT APPLICANT: KATHLEEN M SCHWANZ LOCATION: NEh OF THE N10, OF SECTION 25 EXISTING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF REPORT REPORTED BY APPLICATION SUBMITTED R-1 (RESIDENTIAL) DECEMBER 22, 1981 DEC 14BER 9, 1981 DAVE OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT The application being submitted is for a conditional use permit to allow a beauty parlor in a residential district located at 4283 Stirrup St. An amendment to Section 52.07, Subdivision 4 allows beauty parlors in a residentialul district as a conditional use permit. The applicant is ffilling the requirements of a conditional use permit request. The beauty parlor would be located in a remodeled portion of the home. Remodeling would involve the installation of a new sink, shampoo chair, dryer chair, cut chair, counters, carpeting and a new outside door and walk. The beauty parlor would have two customer parking stalls, which is the requirement outlined in the zoning ordi- nance. If approved, the conditional use permit should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation will be from 8:00 A.M. to 8:30 P.M. only. 2. The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. 3. Customer parking must be on site and limited to two (2) customer automobiles. 4. There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business. 5. There shall be no over the counter sales of merchandise. 6. All other applicable ordinances must be followed. DO/jach 1 '2`F 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 52 - ZONING ORDINANCE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, DOES HEREBY AMEND ITS ORDINANCE NO. 52 AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 52.07 - USE DISTRICTS. Subdivision 4. -- Residential Districts. B. Conditional Uses. 3. Beauty parlors, in R-1 districts only, subject to the following conditions: (a) Hours of operation shall be from 8 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. only. (b) The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. (c) The parking shall be on site and shall be limited to two (2) customer automobiles. (d) There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business except for the type of sign that is allowed in R-1 districts. (e) There shall be no over the counter sales of merchandise. Subdivision 6. -- "P" Public Facilities District. A. Permitted Uses. Within any Public Facilities District, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council: Public structures, parks, playgrounds, camping grounds, swimming pools, tennis courts, golf courses, churches, schools and hospitals, provided any such purpose is not a commercial profit making enterprise. B. Conditional Uses. Within any Public Facilities District no structure cr land shall be used for the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City except by a conditional use permit: I a5' Y E G�a7..lil� v -.5 TI _a r FiJ- "l F2 Gv.:G ` 7Y _: - ----- - - HAI P- GfAvEL. rf21,& �TI 126 lom d -on �50 �r` P- l�D � N� fiGiF� ' 2B'`(pb I OP -FL k '� PLAN IZ7 MENDOrA \N 1: 0��/ .• �� / 1)11 .. - . . � • ,�� ' `I r� ` f J l / / GIB GOLF c, t,� = _ Ind r.' _ _ r ! ..- - - / ,�,�- :. Ind - COMMERCIAL N �, - . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT _ R - �?• n �. R I• ' - Ind !+ I� Ind EE LB P. Rill III j --: , RII ERIL'„. . R. Ind .. it GB 1lG.' Ind`;, �— RBD�� R-iV ell P Ind. .�NIB B- RllP L LB R -II RII RIII R -III • . 3 R -1I ' 1, ' p ,. f-. Inc. �- — LB RIII ��A - - • u RII R-11 P n Ind RII R,�, 0 R -IV•- `RII. 'III 'R Imo' P` .HALL R-11 R -1 R -II ! IN \ HS 4 �Q I, RlE 1; �P,� R� P _ 24 P RII -II P SRI s•T .a �.•,�:..R-II�__r;'r' R -II � N � LB �, 4.- . � � '• � V �i ��I.:.. C77� N E F - NB (– RIII -RB RIII R_fll:. R-IIh �j.l� •n. } i!`T RIII C_SC/GB/LB "..`\ ,-;)f., -- �� 2 .:E. P = RII ✓,-�. __ R-11 R -II R -II - P •� ,. _. RI P R 1 ~gip^/' .•,..” CSC _ t•'.; L! LB P , `(IR; ay I R -I :. . 1I�a.R-1 - DgIgO -II Q R GbLF ccnwn I , R -II i{{ i...4 I eayi RII I�..'..: R -I. - r. R-11 • - i n ,•,` P. 1rw.'�v� R -11 I' P ..-._ry,/' EY )�...-+.--, W� Cts J 2B ~ / l'`: %%p --�%� L•, -, } I �ROSEMOUNT 4;DDITJON, wES' Puat A ADD s -I ?RA W.D, V 1� <: 1 1 / 6 1 � 24 PF A PF .. W i o-fq a LT W a AUDITOR'S SUED f LnLn Z SUN' U`Ir PD 74-1 o z A A .p �:b�`�ti. it _ � ,�•K.i'�'r- C.� l APC Minutes • • December 22, 1981 13. The owners of the property shall accept the additional assessments associated with the upgrading of the zoning of this property for trunk area utilities. They shall also agree to acceptance of the future assessments asosciated with the upgrading of County Roads 30 and 31. 14. An 8 foot bituminous trailway shall be constructed within a 10 foot strip inside of the anticipated future dedication of public right of way along County Road 30, Diffley Road, and County Road 31, at the sole cost of the owner at the location finally determined by the City. All voted yes. KATHLEEN SCHWANZ - CONDITINAL USE PERMIT FOR BEAUTY PARLOR The hearing regarding the application of Kathleen M. Schwanz, of 4283 Stirrup Street for conditional use permit for beauty parlor in a residential district was then considered by the planning commission. Ms. Schwanz was present as was one objecting property owner who submitted a Petition indica- ting 25 homes with 18 contacts, 7 opposing, 5 approving and 6 with no opinion. There were concerns about traffic, alleged reduction in house values, possible danger to children with more traffic, etc. The commission members reviewed the ordinance restrictions on home occupation in a residential district. -After discussion, Turnham moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of opeartion will be from 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. only. 2. The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. 3. Customer parking must be on site and limited to two (2) customer autombiles. 4. There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business. 5. There shall be no over the counter sale of merchandise. 6. The permit shall be granted on an annual basis. 7. All other applicable ordinances must be followed. All voted yes. 130 E 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Sixteen WESLEY MEDIN - WAIVER OF PLAT E. Wesley Medin for Waiver of Plat in Order to Split a 2.3 Acre Parcel into Two (2) Single Family Lots -- A public hearing was held at the December 22, 1981 APC meeting to consider an application by Wesley Medin for a waiver of plat in order to split a 2.3 acre parcel into two single family lots in Section 34. The APC is recom- mending approval to the waiver subject to conditions outlined in the minutes. For additional information on this item,lease refer to the Planning Assistant's report found on pages 13 Z through 13& . For the action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Uommission, refer to page ( 3 7 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the recom- mendation of the APC to approve the waiver of plat as presented. 131 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: WESLEY MEDIN 0 LOCATION: PART OF NE; OF Sha OF SECTION 34, 1325 CARP= HILLS DRIVE EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: MW • 7 L.y5 M910, Fol «moi: .YML•F:31 a�- DAVE OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT An application has been submitted to allow for the subdivision of an unplatted parcel for a single family lot. CCP?)MS The applicant has rsq6ested to split his 2.186 acre parcel into two lots in order to construct another single family home. Presently there is an existing hone on the western portion of the property, and the waiver would allow a home to be con- structed on the eastern portion of the property. The newly created lot would con- sist of 46,525 square feet, or 1.068 acres. Por. Medin's remaining lot would con- sist of 48,704 square feet, or 1.118 acres. Because the parcel is bordered by the Dakota County Park, staff has contacted the Dakota County Park Department. Staff informed the Dakota County Park Department of the application being submitted by Mr. Merlin. Staff suggested to the Park officials that they look into purchasing the land before it is platted. At this time, staff has not been contacted by the Dakota County Park Department. If approved, the application should be subject to the following conditions: 1. No variances should be granted for the newly created lot. 2. Drainage and utility easements should be required along all lot lines. 3. Any assessments on either of the newly created lots will be handled sexy. arately. Presently there are no assessments on either lot. DMO/jack X32- SVGTCH d6,I/QY'CQI ter; WGSLS�j t` aDIrJ 9r. oc 54c. JQ--11-23 (SA4) o�o(3 too. 581420 Nov. Ii 198 9 F tj to � A \ y R New A2cas .A., 48104 sQ• = 1,118 Access 1525 SQ, �{, = I.0�8 AcrLias ------------ s 2) SQ. 2.ts� Acr�Es 133 0 0 65 10 Isrigincertng a Soil Testing -6 t.und Surve,.atg 0 mmung el 101 (:!af :i;,a,; P,:: i n 'Ainnesord 55337 0 SKETCH I FOR WESLEY N H 263� �Ie 30 t toz . 00 ME®IN- R NOTE 7hl-r d.-awily has herA7 ap d a canneefion herew;117 .34, 7-w,-. 27, 1?66. 23 PARCEL A Jai IORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP WrSI , DESCRI?EP A$ O FOR WESLEY N H 263� �Ie 30 t toz . 00 ME®IN- R NOTE 7hl-r d.-awily has herA7 ap d a canneefion herew;117 .34, 7-w,-. 27, 1?66. 23 PARCEL A Jai IORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP WrSI , DESCRI?EP A$ MENDWA /F l GB fi. 6 / 5 Dix nue .. , Ht t /"� � ' (I` • J.,r Ind LB ooF- Rnl RIII` /. Ind r i s / R r N RD a— Ind Psi-v v LJL.--1..-r- R I R-111 J a _ ,.'. - Ind �.— • - ,r ! -�., � R -III • �� (f RII PR.II - NB I2 ��ERRIZLgCSC LBi P _R-1— RII R` - < Q. N ' RI .<.c' c f �^ "�- _.R -II / s_ 69�. �. . v CRY R -II Ind. ii P Q HALL R I R- �i V Com.. FFI .I ./ 'B`!� (' RII � ^r. int tl'R (,k •�. E �j n �� i-. ..© �-• _� R1 �i 1'. .Iii....` - r I i LB G� fEdp�_ _y Roll L': b� LB b -- ✓' �IN /t t�r�i :R1: r Rill RB R -III '.s ry , `.• .r 1 " L /^ j f!! R-111 RIII R Ij , - �tDs CSC/G6/LB ,:�( ��-^��'•`'-IIIIII 1'\ R -III Ral CSC UL_J R -II r II = RRII RII I PO 1 rna> ;+ z l R -II /'� ' NB / I R-1 I� `I l!:; r l` I r • . �IR-li ' --- LB R -III LB �P .:.. - - RB RII R-11 33 R-11 D..or. earn til-� �• t - -h�rN Y i / ,. p �/•� /lf.0 e V .v+� m. , 'p."�n•,• ,R J[4NM � I 4 _ �� � ,,I _� , r_I - AF!•L4 � V.,L LAY 1 HOSEMCt1NT 3 co R—i NR ;R-3 A R-rl PF —2 07 r--A LLJ. PF K rAhT- 7: K 4 A 44A$ �D A 4.1 A PKCPF PF E t if r r' P7 A, I: R-1 R—i PF PARKVIEW GOLF -1*.�,?O." COURSE-;,L3,111:.,.)..13,�j:,3..a.Lii--.,J.-�!,.�i. AX JZ J AYJ. W,1:1a tW J N, APC Minutes December 22, 1981 WESLEY MEDIN - WAIVER OF PLAT - CARRIAGE HILLS DRIVE The hearing regarding the application of Mr. Wesley Medin for waiver of plat, covering a part of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 34, at 1325 Carriage Hills Drive was convened by. the Chairman. Mr. and Mrs. Medin were present and stated that they wanted to readjust the property line, having acquired an adjacent parcel recently. Mr. Medin also stated that the Dakota County Park Director had indicated that there is no funding to purchase the vacant parcel and there were no objections. Harrison moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. No variances shall be granted for the newly created lot. 2. Drainage and utility easements shall be required along all lot lines. 3. Any assessments on either of the newly created lots shall be handled separately. Presently there are no assessments on either lot. All voted yea. BICENTENNIAL 8TH ADDITION The next public hearing convened by Chairman Harrison concerned the application of Federal Land Company for preliminary plat approval of Bicenten- nial 8th Addition. Tim Murnane was present on behalf of the applicant. It was noted that an application had been submitted for preliminary plat approval on the same parcel on April 20, 1981 and because the proposed use did not conform with the lot configuration, approval was not given at that time. It was further noted that the set backs and lot coverage have not been determined by the applicant, and further, that there may be cross -easements required for the proposed office building or the motel. There was discussion concerning the possible variance and it was suggested that the application was premature until the uses and layout are determined with more certainty. The property is currently platted as an outlot and could continue to be in such status until the proposed uses are planned. Bohne moved, Krob seconded the motion to continue the application until the next regular meeting, noting that there is insufficient data that has been submitted as to the layout or the site plan. All voted yea. HEIGHT LIMITATION STUDY City Planner Runkle submitted a study regarding height limitations in Metropolitan area municipalities with some proposals regarding height limita- tion for commercial buildings in the City. No action was taken. I1-7 6 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Seventeen AMUSEMENT DEVICE APPLICATION - COACHMAN OAKS APARTMENT F. Amusement Device Application for Coachman Oaks Apartments - The manager of Coachman Oaks apartments is requesting an application for allowing three (3) game machines to be located at the Coachman Oaks Apartment complex. An amusement device license was previously granted to Coachman Oaks Apartments. At the time of license renewal the Coachman Oaks 'Apartment complex did not renew the amusement device license, and, therefore, it is required that they go through a new application process. The application for license is in order for consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an amuse- ment device application for three game machines to be located in the Coachman Oaks Apartments. PROJECT 353 F. Project 353, Receive/Approve Feasibility Report (T.H. 55 Utility Revisions & Signals) -- Because of the forthcoming temporary con- nection of I-494 with T.H. 55, MnDOT will be completing the up- grading of T.H. 55 from the Airliner Motel on Morris Avenue to the Skelly Station at the south junction of T.H. 149. Because of this upgrading and resulting grade changes, several revisions to existing utilities within state right-of-way had to be performed which are the City's financial responsibility. In addition, instal- lation of signals and future utility crossings necessitated the preparation of a feasibility report delineating all these improve- ments and their estimated cost. Because all costs associated with this project will be funded from the trunk utility and major street fund (signals), there are no assessments associated with this pro- ject. Therefore, it will not be necessary to hold a public hearing. However, this feasibility report is being presented to the Council's attention so that they may be aware of the costs involved. A copy of the feasibility report is enclosed on pages j3q through /S) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive/approve the feasi- bility report for Project 353 for T.H. 55 utility revisions and signals and to authorize the preparation of a cost participation agreement with MnDOT. 1319 REPORT TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 UTILITY REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 353 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA r •: B", Rte, y4adwtda 9 4d, 9,k. 8t P"4 Mr.,nasota 139 13 0 4ad4,4-li & 4, 2335 *4 1...A .Y.y4..,.q 36 sf. P..r. h(--" 55,13 /14...• 612.636-4600 December 28, 1981 Honorable Mayor and City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. .55122 0 J0rc. p 0 uu., Ruur,NnHL'. Nnhrrr I- nrmvR. .E, J .... ph f. And,,I,k. VL. Ib mpurd A. Lrmbng. P.E Nnluud E. 7hors, P f J.rrrrr C. onnn. P.E. 0(� 1956 -grh - 1981A nniversary Counc>: r >i I Re: Trunk Highway 55 Utility Revisions Project 353 File No. 49249 r;h nn R. Cook, P.E. A'ruh A. Gordon. P.E. Fh....r E. Nnyrr. P.E. Ruh.,d IV. Furor, P.E. R,,hrrr G. Srlunrwhl. P.E. Vmun 1.. Snrrala. P.E. pnnnfd C. RurF.rdr. P.E. J ... y A. R.urdmr. P.E. AJark A. Ranson, P.F. Chudra A, Eorkanrr Lrn Al. P.wef, r Rurlun AJ. Ohnn aurid E. Olr.nr Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Trunk Highway 55 Utility Revisions, Project 353. This report covers revision of existing utilities and construction of future utility crossings as part of T.H. 55 Grading and Surfacing S.P. 1909-55. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li Encl. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: December 28, 1981 Reg. No. 14260 Approv d �� as A. Colher Director of Public Works Date: 140 7805a 0 0 TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 UTILITY REVISIONS SCOPE: The Minnesota Department of Transportation is scheduled to upgrade Trunk Highway 55, State Project 1909-55 from a point 0.5 mile east of Blue Gentian Road to a point 0.2 mile east of the south junction of Trunk Highway 149. This construction is proposed for the spring of 1982. Required as part of this construction is the relocation of utilities within T.H. 55 right-of- way which are owned and maintained by the City of Eagan. Mn/DOT will include the necessary construction for the relocation of public utilities as part of their contract. The City of Eagan, however, will be required to reimburse Mn/DOT all costs directly related to construction of utilities owned by the City of Eagan. The purpose of this report is to summarize construction for these public utilities and present a cost estimate outlining these costs as determined by Mn/DOT and Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. Costs will be sepa- rated for each utility trunk fund which they are attributable to. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible and is in accor- dance with the Master Utility Plans for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein will be constructed by Mn/DOT as part of Trunk Highway 55 Grading and Surfacing - State Project 1909-55. The City of Eagan's Utility Enterprise Fund has anticipated and provided for renewal and replacement of its system as required by projects such asldescribed herein. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer: It is proposed as part of this project to construct an 18 inch trunk sanitary sewer beneath T.H. 55 directly south of the northerly Page 1. 7805a P+ 0 0 junction of T.H. 149 as indicated on the drawing included at the back of this report. The 18 inch sanitary sewer will connect to an existing manhole loca- ted directly southwest of T.H. 55. The sanitary sewer will provide service to the area east of T.H. 55 and T.H. 149 and north of Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. #26). Also, included is the adjustment of a sanitary sewer manhole located in the right-of-way of T.H. 55 at Frontage Road A. Water Main: Water main construction includes relocation of existing water main due to significant grade changes as part of upgrading T.H. 55. Because of the importance of providing continued service to users of the system and updating the water main pipe material, new ductile iron pipe of the required size will be constructed parallel to the in place old cast iron pipe. The connections will be made by the contractor at night (11 P.M. to 5 A.M.) thus allowing the system to remain in operation during high demands. The water main crossing west of Lawrence Avenue is the only pipe which will increase in size, 8 inch to 12 inch. Also included as part of water main construction is strategic relocation of various hydrants, gate valves, and the placement of insulation at various storm sewer crossings. The figure at the back of this report indicates water main construction required as part of this project. Storm Sewer: Storm sewer construction proposed' as part of this project for the most part is small lateral lines and cross culverts providing drainage within T.N. 55 right-of-way. This storm sewer will be financed entirely by Mn/DOT. The storm sewer segment, however, from the northerly junction of T.H. 149 and T.H. 55 to Pond FP -1 has been sized properly to provide drainage from the area located east of T.H. 149 and T.H. 55. As a result the City of Eagan Page 2. 7805a / will be required to enter into a cost sharing agreement with Mn/DOT•for this segment of storm sewer. The remaining storm sewer included as part of this proiect will be financed entirely by Mn/DOT. Signals: A signalized intersection will be installed at the north and south junctions of T.H. 55 and T.H. 149 together with an installation at T.H. 55 and County Road 26 (Lone Oak Road). In accordance with Dakota County policy, the City of Eagan shares 50% of the costs incurred at County Road intersections for their portion. Included in Appendix B is the cost percentage distribution for each governmental agency based on estimated costs for the signal at County Road 25. Also included is an interconnect system between the two signals at County Road 26 and T.H. 141). Present Mn/Dot policy requires financial con- tribution from governmental agencies based on the "legs" of the intersection for the interconnect system. Included in Appendix B is the required cost dis- tribution for each governmental agency based on estimated costs for the inter- =connect system. EASEMENTS: An easement will be required to construct the 18" trunk sanitary sewer between the southwesterly right-of-way of T.H. 55 to the existing man- hole. It is anticipated this easement will be acquired at no cost. COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A for sani- tars sewer and water main. These cost estimates were prepared by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik 6 Assocs. Detailed cost estimates are also included for storm sewer and signals which were prepared by Mn/DOT for that portion which the City of. Eagan will be required to enter into a cost sharing agreement. A summary of these costs for each governmental agency is as follows:. Page 3. 7805a 14-3 The total estimated costs include 12% for legal, engineering, and adminis- tration due to the fact that design, contract management and field engineering is provided by Mn/DOT and no overhead relating to bonding, construction financing or assessments will be required. Included in Appendix B is 'peak flow comparisons between Eagan and Mn/DOT for determining the cost separation for storm sewer. Costs presented above are estimated costs and will be re- vised based on final costs. ASSESSMENTS: It is not proposed to assess adjacent property owners for any costs presented herein. All costs will be divided accordingly between each trunk fund. Trunk area storm sewer assessments are being levied under Project 302 which will be sufficient to cover the proposed trunk storm sewer extension to the East of T.H. 149. Section 1 (Old Dayton Hudson property) has already been assessed for trunk sanitary sewer previously by agreement. Page 4. /44 7805a Dakota Eagan County Mn/DOT Federal Total Sanitary Sewer $ 17,590 -- -- --. $ 17,590 Water Main 86,500 -- -- -- 86,500 Storm Sewer 76,490 -- $11,480 -- 87,970 Signal: Inter- connect System 6,440 6,440 17,920 $92,400 123,200 TOTAL 5187,020 6,440 $29,400 $92,400 $315,260 The total estimated costs include 12% for legal, engineering, and adminis- tration due to the fact that design, contract management and field engineering is provided by Mn/DOT and no overhead relating to bonding, construction financing or assessments will be required. Included in Appendix B is 'peak flow comparisons between Eagan and Mn/DOT for determining the cost separation for storm sewer. Costs presented above are estimated costs and will be re- vised based on final costs. ASSESSMENTS: It is not proposed to assess adjacent property owners for any costs presented herein. All costs will be divided accordingly between each trunk fund. Trunk area storm sewer assessments are being levied under Project 302 which will be sufficient to cover the proposed trunk storm sewer extension to the East of T.H. 149. Section 1 (Old Dayton Hudson property) has already been assessed for trunk sanitary sewer previously by agreement. Page 4. /44 7805a 0 PART I - SANITARY SEWER n U APPENDIX A COST ESTIMATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 UTILITY REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 353 300 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Cl. 5 @ $40.00/lin.ft. $ 12,000 1 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/casting (MH -101) @ $2,400.00/ea. 2,400 1 Each Connect 18" RCP to ex. MH @ $500.00/each. 500 1 Each Adjust sanitary sewer manhole @ S200.00/each 200 100 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 600 TOTAL $ 15,700 +12i Legal, Engineering & Administrative 1,890 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $ 17,590 PART II - WATER MAIN 60 Lin.ft. 20" DIP Cl. 51 in pl. @ S30.00/lin.ft. $ 1,800 150 Lin.ft. 12" DIP Cl. 51 in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 3,300 1,630 Lin.ft. 8" DIP Cl. 52 in pl.,,@ $15.00/lin.ft. 24,450 20 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Cl. 52 in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft. 280 120 Lin.ft. 12" DIP Cl. 52 w/18" steel casing @ $80.00/lin.ft. 9,600 1100 Lin.ft. 8" DIP Cl. 52 w/14" steel casing @ S60.00/lin.ft. 6,000 300 Lin.ft. 24" steel casing @ $30.00/lin.ft. 9,000 1 Each 20" butterfly valve & box @ $2,200.00/each 2,200 1 Each 12" butterfly valve & box @ $1,200.00/each 1,200 1 Each 8" Resilient wedge G.V. & box @ $400.00/each 400 7805a Page 5. /4S 7805a Page 6. / 7A7 0 0 PART II — WATER MAIN ......Cont'd. 2 Each 6" Resilient wedge G.V. & box @ $350.00/each 700 1 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each 900 2,600 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.00/lb. 2,600 65 Sq.Yds. Insulate water main @ $20.00/sq.yd. 1,300 1,500 Lin.ft. Salvage 8" CIP @ $4.00/lin.ft. 6,000 100 Lin.ft. Salvage steel casing from 8" CIP Sta.144+00@ $10/1.f. 1,000 3 Each Salvage and install existing hydrant @ $700.00/each 2,100 1 Each Salvage and install 8" G.V. and box @ S500.00/each 500 1 Each Connect 8"x12" increaser to 8" G.V. & box @ $400/ea. 400 4 Each Connect 8" DIP to ex. 8" CIP @ $400.00/each 1,600 1 Each Connect 8" DIP to ex. 20"x8" tee @ $400.00/each 400 1 Each Connect 8" DIP to ex. 8"x8" tee @ 5400.00/each 400 1 Each Plug & block ex. 8"x8" tee @ $500.00/each 500 1 Each Connect 1" copper to 8" DIP @ $300.00/each 300 50 Ton Rock Stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 TOTAL $77,230 +12% Legal, Engineering & Administrative 9,270 TOTAL WATER MAIN .................................. $86,500 7805a Page 6. / 7A7 0 0 PART III - STORM SEWER M.H. 7.6 to M.H. 27 1 Each Casting Assemblies @ $250.00/each $ 250 8.5 Lin.ft. M.H. 4019-96" @ S500.00/lin.ft. 4,250 3.6 Lin.ft. M.H. A or F @ $140.00/lin.ft. 504 4 Each 30" L.R. Bends Cl. IV @ $250.00/each 1,000 178 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. III (3006) @ $41.20/lin.ft. 7,333 200 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. IV (3006) @ 946.05/lin.ft. 9,210 100 Lin.ft. Trenching 8-10 @ $9.50/lin.ft. 950 150 Lin.ft. Trenching 10-12 @ $13.50/lin.ft. 2,025 144 Lin.ft. Trenching 12 @ $16.00/lin.ft. 2,304 +12% Legal, Engineering 6 Administrative TOTAL 527,826 TOTAL M.H. 27-28 .................................. +12% Legal, Engineering 6 Administrative 3,344 TOTAL M.H. 26-27 .................................... $31,170 M.H. 27 to M.H. 28 2 Each Casting Assemblies @ $250.00/each $ 500 24.7 Lin.ft. M.H. A or F @ $140.00/lin.ft. 3,458 220 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. III (3006) @ $41.20/lin.ft. 9,064 180 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. II (3006) @ $36.00/lin.ft. 6,480 140 Lin.ft. Trenching 8-10 @ $9.50/lin.ft. 1,330 120 Lin.ft. Trenching 8-12 @ $11.50/lin.ft. 1,380 140 Lin.ft. Trenching 10-12 @ $13.50/lin.ft. 1,890 TOTAL $24,102 +12% Legal, Engineering 6 Administrative 2,888 TOTAL M.H. 27-28 .................................. $26,990 Page 7. 7805a /4-% 0 0 M.H. 28 to M.H. 29 -1 Each Casting Assemblies @ $250.00/each $ 250 17.6 Lin.ft. M.H. A or F @ S140.00/lin.ft. 2,464 200 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. III (3006) @ $41.20/lin.ft. 8,240 . 200 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. IV (3006) @ S46.05/lin.ft. 9,210 50 Lin.ft. Trenching 9-11 @ $11.00/lin.ft. 550 70 Lin.ft. Trenching 9-12 @$12.00/lin.ft. 840 50 Lin.ft. Trenching 11-12 @ $13.00/lin.ft. 650 80 Lin.ft. Trenching 12 @ $16.00/lin.ft. 1,280 50 Lin.ft. Trenching 12-14 @ 518.50/lin.ft. - 925 100 Lin.ft,. Trenching 14-17 @ S22.00/lin.ft. 2,200 TOTAL $26,609 +12% Legal, Engineering, Administrative 3,191 TOTAL M.H. 28-29 ................................. $29,810 TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................. $87,970 PART IV - SIGNALS A. Signal at Co.Rd. 26 6 T.H. 55 $80,000 + 12% Legal, Engineering, Admin. 9,600 Total $89,600 B. Interconnect System $30,000 + 12% Legal, Engineering, Admin. 3,600 Total $33,600 7805a Page 8. /4-1 0 0 APPENDIX 8 COST SEPARATION TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 UTILITY REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 353 I. STORM SEVER M.H. 29 to M.H. 28 Mn/DOT Eagan Total Fagan Peak Flow 25.7 c.f.s. 100% $31,170 Mn/DOT Peak Flow 0.0 c.f.s. 0% -- 25.7 c.f.s. $31,170 M.A. 28 to M.H. 27 Mn/DOT Eagan Total Eagan Peak Flow 25.7 c.f.s. 79.8% S21,530 Mn/DOT Peak Flow 6.5 c.f.s. 20.2% 5,460 32.7 c.f.s. $26,990 M.H. 27 to M.H. 26 fin/DOT Eagan Total Fagan Peak Flow 25.7 c.f.a. 79.8% $23,790 Mn/DOT Peak Flow 6.5 c.f.s. 20.2% 6,020 32.2 c.f.s. 929,810 STORM SEWER SUMMARY Eagan $76,490 Mn/DOT 11,480 TOTAL ....$87,970 Page 9. 7805a / +9 TI. SIGNALS A. Signal (Co, Rd. 26 & T.H. 55) 75% Federal $67,200 12.-1/2% State 11,200 6-1/4% Dakota County 5,600 6-1/4% City of Eagan 5,600 TOTAL $89,600 B. Interconnect System Total Split 75% Federal $25,200 25% Non -Federal 8,400 Total. $33,600 Non -Federal Split State - 8 legs $ 6,720 County - 1 leg 840 City - 1 leg 840 TOTAL - 10 legs S 8,400 SIGNAL SUMMARY Federal State County City Total Signal Co.Rd. 26, T.H. 55 $67,7.00 511,200 $5,600 $5, 600 S 89,600 Interconnect System 25,200 6,720 840 840 33,600 TOTAL S92,400 $17,920 $6,440 $6,440 S123,200 Page 10. 7805a 1 g'0 Q �GAj RELOCATE HYD, RELOCATE Q3LWNNECT DIP TB"EX. DIPCIP WATER MAIN v _,� _ --- _!CONNECT DIPWATER MAIN �2" DIP WATER MAIN 2"lCir OIP TO E%. LIP v� T.H. 55 G' 'it CONNECT DIP TO EX. CIP i i i i i 130" MNP9 • MH -26 30" MH•2730" MH -2B 1\ COST SHA R/N6 STORM SEWER � a /B •,0 F` Cp '44RY i r� SfkfR PG T.H. 55 UTILITY REVISION PROJECT 353 • F T t, ,s Oip k SCALE 1 200 ss 4TfN ~4jN� CONNECT DIP TO E%. CIP b Q• V / RELOCATE G.V. B BOX ^� RELOCATE HYD. FILE NO. 49249 �y { F A� rt Aa _ _ BM STRK YOSEK, ANDFAIIII i ASSM LMC. :mob a—B"DIP WATER MAINy� /\� X20"DIP WATER MAIN /�1 t`W.1 T' S / Q �GAj RELOCATE HYD, RELOCATE Q3LWNNECT DIP TB"EX. DIPCIP WATER MAIN v _,� _ --- _!CONNECT DIPWATER MAIN �2" DIP WATER MAIN 2"lCir OIP TO E%. LIP v� T.H. 55 G' 'it CONNECT DIP TO EX. CIP i i i i i 130" MNP9 • MH -26 30" MH•2730" MH -2B 1\ COST SHA R/N6 STORM SEWER � a /B •,0 F` Cp '44RY i r� SfkfR PG T.H. 55 UTILITY REVISION PROJECT 353 • F T t, ,s Oip k SCALE 1 200 ss 4TfN ~4jN� CONNECT DIP TO E%. CIP b Q• V / RELOCATE G.V. B BOX ^� RELOCATE HYD. FILE NO. 49249 �y { F A� rt Aa _ _ BM STRK YOSEK, ANDFAIIII i ASSM LMC. :mob a—B"DIP WATER MAINy� /\� X20"DIP WATER MAIN /�1 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Eighteen ADDITIONALwlTEMS!r PUBLIC WORKS SALARY SCHEDULE A. Public Works Supervisory Salary Schedule for 1982 -- The City Administrator and Director of Public Works have completed the re- organization of the Public Works maintenance division. The re- organization was followed through as reviewed and directed by the City Council. The City Administrator asked the Director of Public Works to prepare a memorandum for file on the reorganization, a copy of which is enclosed on pages ISS through /55' for your reference. Included in this memoran u� a copy oF an organiza- tional table and salary recommendations that the City Administrator and Director of Public Works are requesting for these positions. Each of the personnel listed in the report have been contacted by the Director of Public Works so they are aware of the reorganiza- tion proposed for City Council ratification. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the re- organization of the Public Works maintenance division as recommended by the Director of Public Works and City Administrator. _tAomm ity drain stratCr a IS'Z 0 MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JANUARY 15, 1982 SUBJECT: REORGANIZATION OF PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE DIVISION -- SALARY COMPENSATION Attached to this report is a proposed new organizational structure that will be implemented effective January 16, 1982. As can be seen from this new organization structure, the position of foremen has been eliminated and a new job title of Assistant Superintendent (Utilities and Buildings) has been designated. This new superin- tendent position is proposed to be filled by Joe Connolly, present utility foreman. Mr. Bob Shockley, street department foreman, has been informed of the elimination of his position with a sixty day notification to become effective March 15, 1982. It has been proposed to continue Mr. Shockley at his present 1981 salary until March 15. At that time, if Mr. Shockley has expressed a desire to continue employment with the City, the City will make a deter- mination pertaining to retaining his services as a street main- tenance employee with a rate of pay equivalent to the standard union contract in effect at that time. Because Mr. Connolly will be assuming additional responsibilities associated with his new position, it is recommended that his base salary be increased by $170 prior to a 9% increase for 1982. Because Bill Branch will be sharing some of his administrative responsibilities with Joe Connolly under this new organization, an 8% increase is recommended in determining his 1982 salary. The following table illustrates the financial impact of this reorganization based on the following assumptions for .•comparative purposes: If no reorganization took place and the status quo was con- tinued in 1982, it was assumed that all personnel would receive a 9% increase. 2. Since the new union contract has not been resolved as of this date, the 1982 salary for a maintenance employee was based on the assumption that the present Level II, Step C rate of pay was increased by 9%. 3. The increase to the base rate of pay for Jim McGuffee, park foreman, would not be applied without this reorganization. Under the proposed reorganization, it is assumed that a $45 per month increase would be added to the base rate of pay before a 9% increase was applied. /S3 Reorganization Memo January 15, 1982 Page Two STATUS QUO ORGANIZATION FOR -1982 Public Works Supt. $2190/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos = $28,645.20 Utilities Foreman 1852/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos = 24,224.16 Park Foreman 1852/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos = 24,224.16 Street Foreman 1852/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos = 243224.16 1982 X101,317.68 PROPOSED REORGANIZATION FOR -1982 Supt -of Streets & Eqpt. $2190/mo + 0 x 1.08 x 12 mos. _ $28,382.40 Supt of Utilities & Bldgs. 1852/mo + $170/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos. = 26,447.76 Park Foreman 1852/mo + $ 45/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos. = 24,812.76 Street Maint. Employee $8.87/hr. x 1.09 x 2080 hrs. = 20,110.64 TOTAL 1982 = $99,752.98 Cost Savings: $1,564.70 = 108 brs. O.T. Maint. Employee As can be seen, a cost savings would occur up to the point that the new street maintenance employee (previous street foreman) earned 108 hours of overtime. Based on these facts, it can be shown that this new organization proposal will not create a financial impact to the City of Eagan. Therefore, it is the Public Works Director's request that this reorganization and salary schedule be presented to the Council at the January 19, 1982 Council meeting for formal approval retroactive to January 1, 1982. Please inform me if additional information or justification is necessary to present this information to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works 154 Pv�t- kc 0 P pE PT �Q0.oPoseq� P tL�cToGL yz Sac SUPT %x S ee-Y �ssr Su pT. Srttarrs, C'QPr SANrrArLY $ro2M + WASTER. 1 7 Mn,Kr Pe LSOfINQl I I G M AINr PemsoNAeek. I 9 • 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 15, 1982 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE Comprehensive Guide Plan Review The City of Eagan has reviewed the preliminary draft of the Metro- politan Council's review report on Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. There are some minor issues which the City had to address prior to final staff review. These issues have been addressed by the City Planner. A copy of his letter and response to the Metropolitan Council is enclosed on pages Kcj through 60 . In speaking with the Metropolitan staff, t e?e are no apparent problems with any of the issues; it was more a matter of clarifica- tion on the part of the City. Mr. John Voss, the City's planning consultant, has worked with Mr. Runkle, reviewing these comprehen- sive guide plan changes. Rauenhorst Gravel Permit Renewal The City Administrator has carried out the direction of the City Council regarding the gravel permit renewal for Rauenhorst. Chief Building Inspector Peterson has met with Mr. Ted Jirick of Rauen- horst, who is the Director of Mining, Excavating and Grading, to discuss the City's concerns. He has assured the City that any excavating that takes place will be left in a condition that com- plies with City ordinances and OSHA requirements. The Director of Public Works has contacted MnDOT requesting information on (1) the status of right-of-way acquisition of I -35E; (2) the proposed future elevations of I -35E; and (3) any additional information pertaining to anticipated excess or burrow material resulting from construction of this highway through Section 10. The concerns addressed by the City Council are being 'reviewed by City staff. House File #1505 Mayor Blomquist and City Administrator Hedges learned at a recent Mayor & Manager Breakfast that Representative Carolyn Rodriguez is a co-author of House File #1505 which is a "Bill for an Act RElating to Metropolitan Government: Providing for the Establish- ment and Operation of a Water Planning and Management Program in the Metropolitan Area, Requiring Watershed and Local Water Manage- ment Plans, Establishing a Metropolitan Water Resources Advisory Board, Providing for the Establishment and Operation of Watershed Management Organizations, Establishing a Program of Planning and Capital Improvement Grants, Authorizing County and Metropolitan Debt, Authorizing Taxes". Apparently, Representative Rodriguez 156 0 0 Informative Memo January 15, 1982 Page Two co-authored the bill so she could be assured that the Metropolitan Council would not receive the regulatory authority over watershed which would merely expand their current bureaucracy. Enclosed on page /61 is a copy of a letter from Representative Rodriguez that explains er reasons for co-authoring House File 1505. State Aid Deferred Payments The City of Eagan has received an I.O.U. from the Minnesota Depart- ment of Revenue regarding deferred payments of state aid. The amount certified to the City in deferred aids for 1981 is $236,580.10. This is slihtly less than the amount projected by our Director of Finance; 239,258.38. The difference appears to be in homestead tax credit and not in local government aid. Height Limitation Analysis The subcommittee reviewing height limitations met on January 11, 1982. After considerable discussion on different approaches on regulating height limitations, as presented by the City Planner, the City staff was directed to collect additional data and prepare some regulatory models for consideration at the next meeting. That meeting is tentatively scheduled for January 25, 1982. A recommendation from that committee will be made to the Advisory Planning Commission followed by a recommendation of the APC to the City Council at a later date. Tax Exempt Mortgage Financing Update Enclosed on pages _ /6 Z through _J63 is a copy of the most recent update for the tax exempt mortgage inaancing program. Miscellaneous Legal Actions Status Report Enclosed is an update of the legal actions that are pending or have been resolved concerning the City of Eagan (pages 16!f through 10 )• Miscellaneous Correspondence Oftentimes, action is taken at a City Council meeting to direct the City Administrator to write letters of correspondence regarding certain issues as a result of formal or informal City Council actions. Historically, the City Administrator has written these letters; however, copies are often not given to the City Council. Beginning with this Council packet, any correspondence directed by the City Council to the City Administrator at a City Council meeting will be copied as informational business with the next City Council packet. At the January 5, 1982 meeting, letters were 157 • Informative Memo January 15, 1982 Page Three directed as follows: C� 1. Cable Television/Joint Powers Agreement City of Burnsville 2. Letter of Appreciation to the Dakota County Board of Commis- sioners regarding the 911 telephone service 3. Letter to the Dakota County Plat Committee regarding Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition (Special Note: This will be placed on the February 2, 1982 agenda) 4. Letter to the history committee 5. Letter to the Dakota County Board regarding the Lake Byllesby Dam issue These letters are enclosed on pages 16% through 175" for your information. Firemen's Relief Pension Fund The City Administrator has set a second meeting with Mr. Gus Welter, secretary of the Minnesota State Fire Department Association, and Roger Katzenmaier, the City's auditor, on Thursday, January 21, 1982, to discuss in further detail the proposals concerning an increase and/or different method of retirement pension fund for the volunteer fire fighters. The City Administrator will keep the City Council briefed on that meeting. `Cko,a 14O)M_ City Administrat r 1S�9 BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMASEGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS January 12, 1982 BARBARA L SENNESS PRINCIPAL REVIEWER METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 300 METRO SQUARE BLDG ST PAUL MN 55101 Re: Dear Ms. Senness: rIL 0 CITY OF EAGAN ;�;•�]T93 PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN,MINNESOTA•' ssu: PHONE 454-6100 - i•`l Council Staff THOMASHEDGES CITY AOMINISTRAIOR EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE CITY CLERK The City of Eagan has reviewed the preliminary draft of the Council's review report on Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. It is the City's understanding that there are some minor issues which the City has to address prior to the final staff review being complete on January 13, 1982. These issues are addressed in the preliminary draft of the Council's review report on Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. The following items will state the issue first and Eagan's response to the issue in the remainder of this letter. ISSUE - The plan oonfo= to Metropolitan system plans as follows with the exception of the classification of Cliff Road. CaNVE'NT - It is the City's understanding that the Metropolitan Council is presently revising its systems' plan for transportation, and it is the City's understanding that the Council is proposing to modify the transportation plan which would then be consistent with Eagan's Comprehensive Gide Plan. Therefore, at the present time, Eagan is not proposing to amend or change the classification of Cliff Road, County Road 32, from a minor to an intermediate arterial. It is also the City's understanding that the Metropolitan Council's staff will be addressing this item to the Physical Development Committee and the Metropolitan Council. ISSUE - Eagan should amend the projected 1990 Inver Grove Heights flow through Eagan to 0.08 MGD to be consistent with the Inver Grove Heights plan. COMMENT - Eagan has reviewed the flow projections from Inver Grove Heights which would feed into Eagan's sanitary sewer system. The City of Eagan only wants to provide the capacity needed to service Inver Grove Heights. Therefore, the City of Eagan has no objections in revising its .168 M® for 1990 to reflect the 0.08 MGD projected by Inver Grove Heights. Thus, revision will be completed prior to the City of Eagan adopting Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. ISSUE - The plan should make specific reference to 14 MCM 1.3010 concerning MnDOT's regulations and land use safety zones A, B and C. C3`oM]T - Sub -paragraph I in Section IV -23 of Fagan's Comprehensive Gide Plan as amended will be redrafted to exclude the portion which "states if they are located within the A or B Zone related to air navigation at Minneapolis-St.Paul International is9 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. 0 0 Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Guide Plan January 12, 1982 Page two Airport". The revised paragraph will read as follows: "Fagan will consider the following objects as general obstructions to air navigation." ISSUE - The City should include in its Capital Improvements Program a schedule of all projects estimated to cost in excess of $10,000 or a projected five years, the need, estimated cost, funding source and amounts, and the financial inpact that the improvements will have on the City. In addition, the CIP should include a schedule of annual debt service payments on the existing debt and the planned debt until its expiration. COMMfS7'TS-The City use the Capital Improvements Program as an ongoing process. The City will be reviewing the CIP on an annual basis and updating it for the next five years. In this update, the City of Eagan will include all of the cwnrents listed in the above paragraph. Once the City has updated its CIP for the next five-year segment, the City will forward a copy to the Metropolitan Council for their review. ISSUE - According to Minnesota Statute 473.811, Subd. 5, Eagan should adopt an appropriate ordinance, or reference a County ordinance, governing solid waste collection and disposal in the City. Presently, the City of Eagan does have an ordinance entitled Rubbish Collection Ordinance No. 34 which references Minn- esota Statutes Section 368.01 and 412.221 which is in effect in the City of Eagan at the present time. This ordinance presently requires the licensing of opera- tor's within the City. The City is also in the process of codifying all of the ordinances presently adopted by the City. During this codification, the City will look at Minnesota Statutes 473.811, Subd. 5 to update its present ordinance to be consistent with the Minnesota State Statute. It is the City's understanding that the issues and comments which have been listed in this letter will be adequate to fulfill the review process by the Metropolitan Council. If you need further information, or there are additional items to be addressed for the review process, please contact me at the Eagan City Hall. $incerely, 9 -- Dale C. ale City Planner cc - Thomas"' "Hedges,�yCity"Ad7ministrator John Voss, Consultant Planner 160 • Carolyn D. Rodriguez District 53A Dakota County Committees: Education Local and Urban Affairs Transportation Commerce and Economic Development Mr. Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RE: House File No. 1505 Dear Mr. Hedges: Itinnesota _q House of Representatives i Harry A. Sleben, Jr., Speaker January 11, 1982 As co-author of the Levi bill, I am primarily interested in two things. They are: 1) ...making certain that major water shed problems do not go unresolved through the refusal of a locality to deal with it to the detriment of another locality. 2) ...making certain that as much local control as possible is maintained and that the Metropolitan Council receives no additional powers to deal with this area. From their testimony, I gather that they are very interested in gaining this control. I would welcome the opportunity to talk with you or anyone else as to how to best achieve these goals. House File No. 1505 will have to be amended and I hope you will make any suggestions you consider opportune. CDR/dn /6 Sincerely, 64A,4 Carolyn D. Rodriguez % \ L Reply to: El172 State Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 OlfIce: (612) 2968832 IG F1 14215 Drexel Ct.. Annie VAIIeV MlnnncMA 55194 Hnmo IA191 A91.1Sd9 "' U 1PG: January 5, 19 Tptal TnK)unt of Pre-Cannitted loans Pe:'centage of IganS Pre -Cbrmlitted Total. Nl➢1'd�C3r of Loans Average Mor.t-yayc Amount Av!xage Sale Price Average Tq:)praisal Value Average Adjusted Gross Income Average Gross Incom Type of Loan: Insured Conventional. Uninsured Conventional FHA VA Graduated Pledge Averare loan to Value Ratio: Insured Conventional Uninsured Conventional Nud:er of New Construction to uls NLDW.)01- of L'xisL-ing ]lams ']jgla of D-ell.ing: Single Pamdly Townhouse Condominium Mobile HaTes Average Previous Residents Number of Renters Number of Owners Average Age Sex: Male Female Average raimi.ly Size Average Number of Children Marital Status: Married Si.nulc Joint Divorced I'l1lJD:17JG: ' 1)01" Ivrount of UJans Punci lel NCufi1X9: OL t/k711S E CiIY OF ]iAGAN SCati.stica]. DaL;1-- "COU1IL of Prcrlrmi $16,940,000 99 % ]nw incanc fasic .Incrame 153 141 $52,682 $ 61,310 -8.,9-46 —6b- Z12 59.405 _ 67,842 _20,174 24,976 _ 21,460 26,632 20 69 28 65 88% 90% --- 73%_-- --- ... _ 74% --- -- 120 107 ---...--- —34 — 33 76 _ 95 23 30 _ 94 16 — 0 0 18$— 22%_ 111 102 42 _ 39 _ 30.3— ---29.6 104 _ 128 49 — 13 1.8 _ 2.4 - — - 4 — --- —.. 7 — — 65 -- 93 -- ---79---_ � 28 .5 ------14 -- 16,391,750 288 /6 Z - DATE: January 5, 1982 CITY OF EAGAN 516,940,000 --Amount of Program Dollar Amount of Funds Remaining $31,825,00 PLEASE NOTE: This amount can be utilized in any of the following categories: Single Family, Townhouse, Condo, Mobile Home; Low or Basic Incomes; or any Conventional Loans, including Conventional 950,. This does not include the Graduated Pledge Account. At this time, there are no Graduated Pledge Funds available. Total Pre-Conunitment Amount 516,705,025 Total Reserved (Yet to be Pre-Conmitted) S 203,150 $16,940,00 /6 3 0 • PAUL H. HAUGE & ASSOCIATES, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA 58122 PAUL N. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3795 Pilot Knob Road Pagan, MN 55122 January 11, 1982 Re: Miscellaneous Legal Actions -- Status Report Dear Tom: AREA CODE 812 TELEPHONE 454.4224 The following is a report covering legal actions brought for or against the City during the past year for the Council's information: 1. NuWay Builders and Sidney Johnson v. City of Fagan Willmus Properties,etc. This case was appealed to the Supreme Court by NuWay Builders and by Willmus Properties and there have been many delays by NuWay Builders and by supplying the transcript of the eight' days of trial at the District Court level to the Supreme Court. The transcript was due in January and we have just received notice that NuWay has dismissed its appeal because it did not complete its transcript. 2. Aghassi v. City of Fagan. A motion was brought in January to reopen the decision of Judge Lenertz who dismissed the Aghassi petition to force the Council to deliver the off -sale liquor license in Silver Bell Center. Judge Lenertz refused to reopen the case and Aghassi did not appeal. 3. Caponi v. Carlson, City of Eagan, Bonestroo, Rosene, etc. Originally there was an action brought for $60,000 in damages by Caponi against the parties mentioned above including developers and contractors. That action is pending in Dakota County District Court and on December 16 the Commissioner of Natural Resources issued his decision concerning the lake level setting. He followed the guidelines of the Hearing Examiner except that he added that the permit for the outlet to the lake is necessary to be acquired through DNR and will be issued only if the City, the developers, and other interested parties including property owners around the lake acquire easement rights from Mr. Caponi. This may require a third action for condemnation if settle- ment cannot be reached. At the present time Mr. Caponi has received appraisals from Dick Parranto for his damages including $65,000 for the taking along the east and north ends of the lake and $35,000 for cutting off the small point of land at the southwest corner. We have made an offer of settlement of approxi- mately $30,000 which, to this point, has been rejected. This money would come from the property owners on the west side, Rosene, Carlson and Tilsen and Home Insurance Company for the City of Fagan. /6,q- Mr. Hedges • January 11, 1982 Page Two 4. Taylor v. Smith, Parranto and Egan. I have heard nothing transpiring in the action for approximately four to five months. 5. City of Eagan v. Dennis McCarthy -- Wescott Road. The commissioners issued their award on November 3,•1981, for $165,000 including $21,000 for the CPA transmission line and that has now been appealed. The McCarthys have sued for trespass damages in the sum of $275,000 and motions were heard by Judge Kluck on December 16 relating to the trespass action and the acquisition of necessary easements. No decision has been made at the present time on the motions. 6. City of Eagan v. Dennis McCarthy -- Pond Easements. The condemnation action for the pond easement was started in mid -1981 and the short 100=foot piece of storm sewer pipe leading from St. Francis Wood southerly into the ponds was constructed in September. The hearing on the granting of the petitioner for condemnation was heard on December 16 and the Order has not been received granting the condemnation as yet. The trespass action also involves the acquisition of the pond easements. 7. City of Eagan v. Ross Kramer and Cy Barry. This condemnation action was settled with Mr. and Mrs. Ross Kramer for the payment of 813,800 covering the storm sewer outlet from Blackhawk Lake. It is my understanding that construction is nearly complete. The action against Mr. and Mrs. Cy Barry has been dismissed. 8. City of Eagan v. Chapdelaine -- Two Condemnation Actions. Both of these condemnation actions for storm sewer outlet from Bur Oak Pond have been settled, one for $1,500 and the other for $20,000. 9. Thomas Lake Trunk Storm Sewer Appeal. Judge Martin Mansur decided upon motion of the property owners to remand the assessment hearing back to the Council and the first reassessment hearing was held on December 1, 1981. Of 87 property owners, 50 filed objections and the reassessment hearings are now scheduled for January 12, 1982. 10. Trudi Johnson v. City of Eagan -- Assessment Appeal, Dodd Road. The hearing on the assessment appeal covering Dodd Road street improvements, sani- tary sewer and water, was held on December 17. The assessments were $32,000 and the appraiser for the property owner indicated a benefit of $11,200. No decision has been made. 11. Pilot Knob Properties Assessment Appeal -- Drexel Heights Addition. This case was tried before the District Court for three days in October and November of 1981 and briefs have been submitted but no decision has been reached by the Courts at the present time. The assessments were $4,400 per lot for 24 lots and the property owner has admitted to $2,750 in benefit per lot. 12. Dakota County -- Galaxie Road Assessment Appeal. No further proceedings have taken place concerning the assessment appeal. 13. Miscellaneous Assessment Appeals. The City has received about twelve assessment appeals from the September 1980 assessment hearings and they have all been disposed of or settled with the exception of those that are mentioned above. These include some of the more important ones: /6 S Mr. Hedges • January 11, 1982 • Page Three A. Heidi Scheila -- Dodd Road. This case was settled for a total of $3,900 including the acquisition,of necessary right-of-way and claimed damages due to the faulty construction of Dodd Road adjacent to the Scheila property. B. Assessment Appeals by Lexington South and Blackhawk Park. These have been settled by respreading assessments over a larger area of property within each of the planned developments. C. Twin View Manor Assessment Appeal. The Council will remember that an action to enjoin the City from constructing the utility and street improvements in Twin View Manor was commenced approximately a year ago but was dismissed a day prior to commencement of trial. A number of Twin View Manor residents have appealed the assessments and negotiations are taking place for settlement. 14. R.L. Johnson -- Alexander Road Assessment Appeal. The assessments were estimated to be $51,000 in 1978 and the total assessments levied were $185,000. The assessments were appealed and in order to avoid procedural issues the Council has now rescheduled the assessment hearing for February 5, 1982. In the interim we are attempting to settle the appeal. The property owner has requested a 20 -year assessment spread and the City initially spread the assessments over five years. 15. Thomas Ocel v. City of Eagan. The water damage to the Ocel property -on Ches Mar Drive is being handled by the Fagan insurance carrier, Home Insurance Company. Settlement attempts have taken place but have not been completed. 16. Mark Dunn and Bart Dunn Assessment Appeal -- Overview Estates. Although the assessments were appealed, the Dunns are not pursuing the action at the present time. 17. Thomas Lake Road Assessment Appeal -- Scherer, Barker and Smith. These were settled by dismissing the assessments during 1981. 18. Farmington Development, Inc. v. Adelmann and City of Eagan. The City has entered an answer denying any liability to Farmington Development for the assessments paid for Lot 4, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park. We will be bringing a motion for summary judgment in the City's favor in the near future. 19. Spencer v. City of Fagan, Barton Contracting, and Road Machinery and Supplies Company. Home Insurance Company has accepted defense of the lawsuit by the Spencers against the City, and our office will be handling their assessment appeal if they pursue it. 20. Freeway Ford vs. Larsen, Reiter, and City of Fagan. Home Insurance Company is handling the defense of this matter on behalf of the City. /W/(Z/ Mr. Hedges January 11, 1982 Page Four 21. Prosecution. Our office took over the prosecution of misdemeanor cases for the City in late spring and this was first handled by Rich Krambeer. In early July, Kevin Ride began to handle the prosecution work with some assistance from Dave Keller. Also, in mid-July the Dakota County District Court adopted a trial policy of having the prosecutors for the various municipalities working out of the Burnsville County Court attend arraignment hearings each Wednesday afternoon for approximately three hours. It was the hope of the District Court that if additional cases were settled at this time, the attorneys for the cities would make up this additional time by reduced trial case loads. There has not been a significant reduction in the case loads, however, there have been cost savings to the County in reduced public defender expenditures and per- haps savings to the City in reduced appearances by the police officers. It is estimated by our office that 645 new prosecution files were opened and pursued in 1981, resulting in the expenditure of approximately 370 hours of attorney time, for the last six months of 1981 only. 22. Ess Brothers v. Erickson Construction Company, Balboa Insurance Company, and City of Eagan. This is an action by a subcontractor against the contractor and bonding company and City of Fagan in regard to Project 1180-7. The bond company is defending the City of Eagan which is involved only because a portion of the material supplied by the subcontractor was supplied prior to the date of the contract and bond. The amount of this claim is something over 9500 and does not appear to be a valid claim against the City. 23. Valley Blacktopping v. Erickson, Balboa, City of Eagan. Again, this is Project 1180-7 for a claim similar to Ess Brothers. It appears that Balboa Insurance has reached a,settlement with the Plaintiff Valley Blacktopping. 24. Lyman Lumber Company v. Coachman Oaks Company, Eagan, et al. A sub- contractor has brought an action against the contractor which built apartment buildings with IDR funding through the City of Eagan. It appears that the City was named as a matter of course and does not have exposure in that area in that IDR funding does not result in an interest in the property by the City nor any guarantees by the City. The developer's attorney has agreed to defend the City if necessary. The amount of the claim is $61,000. 25. Eagan v. G & L Sealcoating. This is an action as a result of the contractor's failure to complete the 1980 sealcoating project 1180-18. Settle- ment has been reached with the bonding company which provided the bond for the contractor prior to commencing an action. The bond company has agreed to pay $48,913.90. The foregoing are essentially the actions in which the City was involved in 1981, many of which are now disposed of. If there are specific questions, please call. Very ty41y yours, - Paul H. Hauge skk 167 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL & CABLE TELEVISION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 13, 1982 SUBJECT: LETTER FROM MAYOR BLOMQUIST TO MAYOR SCHEUNEMANN REGARDING It CONSIDERATION FOR A JOINT CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE FOR THE CITY OF BURNSVILLE" Enclosed is a copy of a letter that was sent from Mayor Blomquist to Mayor Scheunemann entitled, "Consideration for a Joint Cable Television Franchise with the City of Burnsville". I thought each committee member would enjoy having a copy of this letter; and if you are able to attend the meeting scheduled for January 20, 1982 at which time the Cable Television Advisory Committee for the City of Burnsville will make a presentation to the Burnsville City Council, please notify this office. The time of that meeting is 7:00 p.m. 1 \� ity Administrator cc: Tom Creighton, Legal Consultant Rich Anthony, Technical Consultant 1 16 1 BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMASEOAN JAMES A, SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMRERS January 12, 1982 MAYOR PAUL SCHEU MANN BUMSVILLE CITY HALL 1313 E HWY 13 BURNSVILLE PMI 55337 i CITY OF EAGAN •�:x,,3195 PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O. BOK 21199 .. EAGAN, MINNESOTA `I 55121 ry PHONE 4$4-8100 , 1 THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMIIIISIRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLERK Re: Consideration for a Joint Cable Television Franchise with the City of Burnsville Dear Paul: Our City Council and appointed Cable Television Advisory Committee have studied the feasibility of providing cable television to our cmminity for the past several months. A needs assessment was conducted last year followed by a detailed study of ownership options that are available to our municipality. The last two (2) meet- ings, the Comrrittee jointly with our City Council, has discussed the joint powers option. Since the City of Eagan was included in a cable service territory with seven (7) other communities at the request of the City of South St. Paul in Septem- ber of 1980, that option was studied in detail. The other alternative viewed by the City of Eagan was to franchise with the City of Burnsville, also studied in detail. At our last Cable Television Advisory Committee Meeting held on Thursday, January 7, 1982, it was a unanimous decision of the Committee, including zrenlbers of the City Council, that the City of Eagan narrow the joint franchising options to the City of Burnsville. The ConmitL.ee and members of the City Council feel that the City of Eagan and the City of Burnsville have a great deal in cacmon as it relates to current and future demographics. The City Council will formally consider this re=arendation by the Advisory Committee at their next Council meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 19, 1982. However, since the entire City Council serves as a part of the Cable Television Advisory Committee, and everyone was present but my- self, I was ill that evening, it is certain that the recommrendation will become a mere formality as a City Council practice at the meeting this coming Tuesday. I would like to extend our willingness to serve jointly with your commmity in an effort to franchise a Cable Television system. I feel a strong intergovernrrntal cooperation can prevail as we are willing to share our resources, data collection and any other information that would be helpful for the City of Burnsville as you approach decisions relating to Cable Television. The Cable Television Advisory Committee has made a commitment to move ahead with the franchising process in the next few months so construction can begin in 1982 making cable television avail- able to our residents this year. Our consultants have assured us that this time frame would be possible if the City of Burnsville wishes to franchise jointly with the City of Eagan despite the need for you to complete a needs assessment and consider other decisions. The City of Eagan is extending an invitation to your Cable Television Advisory Committee and City Council to attend a joint meet- ing we will sponsor at 7:00 P.M. on Thursday, February 11, 1982 in our City Coun- cil chambers, Our objective with thatmetingmeeting is to discuss the feasibility THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. Mayor Paul Scheufanann January 12, 1982 Joint Cable Television Franchise Page two i of providing a joint franchise between the Cities of Eagan and Burnsville as it relates to cable television. I will be looking forward to a response from you, and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact ne at any time or have your City Manager, Mr. Spore contact our City Administrator, Mr. Thomas Hedges. Sincerely, Beatta Blchquist Mayor, City of Eagan X70 January 6, 1982 v„4 •T .'y� COMMISSIONER JOHN VOSS ` DAKOTA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 WEST HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 . Re: Dakota County Board Action to Fund 911 Network Installation Costs or the ity of Eagan Dear Commissioner Voss: On behalf of the Eagan City Council, I would like to thank you personally and the Dakota County Board of Commissioners for the action that was taken on December 22, 1981 whereas the Dakota County Board of Commissioners accepted the responsibility to fund the 911 network installation costs for -the City of Eagan as well as five (5) other cities in Dakota County. This action was greatly appreciated by our community and the City will participate in a grant agreement with the Dakota County Board of Commis- sioners for funding the 911 installation charge not to exceed $22,367. Again, the integovernmental relationship between our City and Dakota County and the responsibility you have shown in this action is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, rvW.0'-64 Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd cc: Fred Joy, Dakota County Administrator Martin DesLauriers, Chief of Police i -7r THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. BEA OLOMDUIST • MAYOR THOMAS HEDGES ' CITY ADMINISTRATOR THOMAS ELAN CITY OF EAGAN EUGENE N OVERBEKE JAMES A. SMITH City TV LIERY, JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER �'.5295 PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMNERS . P.O. BOK 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 .. PHONE 454-8100 January 6, 1982 v„4 •T .'y� COMMISSIONER JOHN VOSS ` DAKOTA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 WEST HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 . Re: Dakota County Board Action to Fund 911 Network Installation Costs or the ity of Eagan Dear Commissioner Voss: On behalf of the Eagan City Council, I would like to thank you personally and the Dakota County Board of Commissioners for the action that was taken on December 22, 1981 whereas the Dakota County Board of Commissioners accepted the responsibility to fund the 911 network installation costs for -the City of Eagan as well as five (5) other cities in Dakota County. This action was greatly appreciated by our community and the City will participate in a grant agreement with the Dakota County Board of Commis- sioners for funding the 911 installation charge not to exceed $22,367. Again, the integovernmental relationship between our City and Dakota County and the responsibility you have shown in this action is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, rvW.0'-64 Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd cc: Fred Joy, Dakota County Administrator Martin DesLauriers, Chief of Police i -7r THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. BEA BLOMOUIST • MAYOR THOMASEGAN CITY OF EAGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS - THEODORE WACHTER',�.S195 PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMBERS ,' P.O. BOK 11199 EAGAN,MINNESOTA ' 55u: „-+ PHONE 954-8100 January 12, 1982 LLJ DAKOTA COUNTY PLAT COMMITTEE DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 W HWY 55 "'— HASTINGS MN 55033 Re: Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition Preliminary Plat Dear Sirs: THOMAS HEDGES CITY AOMINISIRAZOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLERM In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular City Council meeting held on December 1, 1981, approval was given to the staff and applicant to prepare Cedar Cliff Com- mercial Addition with a cul-de-sac adjacent to Cliff Road and two access points for parking and commercial development off Nicols Road. Please make reference to.the attached drawing entitled "Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition". 'The Eagan City Council has spent considerable time reviewing this parcel of property and feels this proposal is the best method for platting the 'Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition parcel. The residential integrity of Cedar Cliff Third Addition will be least impacted by this drawing. Traffic volumes on Cliff Road and Nicols Road should not affect the three proposed access points to the property (a cul-de-sac on Cliff Road and two entrances from Nicols Road) due to the Cedar Avenue Freeway and I -35E which are both close to this property. Any revisions to the proposed preliminary plat as prepared would be expensive, realising' the topography adjacent to Scott Trail. The City of Eagan would like a formal response from the Dakota County Plat Committee regarding the pro- posed Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition before any further work is performed by the developer. The City of Eagan is planning to discuss this item at the February 2, 1982 City Council meeting, and, therefore, a response prior to that meeting would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Q�� Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd /7 2 cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner; John Voss, Dakota County Commis- sioner; Steven J. FlanaJ�an; Joe Ryan, St. Paul Companies THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENG H AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. I le - n�aen •I o • •.+461.1 •p tt '1 �I41, J+' 'a - 8oe 1•�� Ir. ['- :Vi ri-1ri,m,t�"',fa• zaoo I•fJteo %ee.fl T I �� . p � !' I hl I ! i ��' l - �•JGC 78.eeI . - �.�' g YV' 4 pI' of ;clh ll'-���+•[E.il-780° of •a_ + % I+ .. 61 A l@ .LI Iti L IA >,I 1 9 yBB •.. Iti .71 II �� �• /Erl�� IL i !II \I I` 'II • �•£,�%+• t'; i I Jv-,( `Earn (�rJ�,•�Gv1 ',,p/y��1�, I �,`,` :+•' li II II li I :_?x - ':iRl v' \�k .� b ,ill 'L— V �- �O r a�:134fy'j I 4 + • '4�I II I I II �`1 I /Iwll � 3 �+ $ � }'t �:+.;�---il'b•!i• I + 'J I ro I v _ I • ,Im I � nm [vn 11 '' � I 4 # ? �' S/; ` . ' I _ r )\' i m _aw I �! +, S'+', ♦600/,[1 4 • uw �.,�--` I 0[tj, 1: iht5 i lct'ih�.-p�v,��..�aL��M'�x•- : •r�' �\ ���'rQ $i:'So I.\`. ,re. .[aa,Y„1r•;liir'a�Y✓ �1I �.',4ge11y[SN�� Iq''.n�s±I..'rI2F+^YEIl�P3VIlIriIE:'i71-�.`.[M\F'VI•I `R�/�'.�O`'afI'A7.brvL`+. I �l8 ._ �+7. 8:—" I1 Ij .e.'SS\Am.axY+l�r�• f�6i aw(,y�I IS . ��4A�'i\b^- h +pCr�rrrroRiYs-I ^ I?���:I T Nm ro `�II . �a '�I1, 'djM, y2YP. yt!n/�s/•,°` titl�ayyZ I. ieVits :?Lr�IJyp'x-.F'{^�'�.�r.l ✓'_-v•s.l r•S!r. •.YEb a? •m✓Ie L . II a'_[I I --�'III \ !I i` noo I r !Ii •3�. I` i �;I� t el+J'. \ I ?r .... B 10 }0anm!8 k7_W�,i,r9Inriu-:r I1 [icyI r .(rx• upO y �I- r t �'i ww.._i.� '�as•v*r f .Ii"� '-i a 11'-- 8 Ic . z s 18 s* 2 A, - "� iee>� •v4✓,r � S ea4 I $-Nx'NY� �-Ar::__ -PPa'^ r >• .. B„r,,,,.�ma+ F - _ n •e°mfpw-l'^".x. °' b -WJE z- n IO � � f\` a >s:a^'ac�a a�xt�aXrr-'�'�tsxti'<,CL4FF.H{C'L*.r; �' `. ,;'J a •'b ' 31 .✓/rrz:,a:t 'Ipaaa F �' uop u'A\ 1111? y B 6 1- B c yt y ipl • •n r°-S"•'ye `'' e . I a II- ` i4'+ -.i 1S B $ul 8 8 •a 'Yw x ai +• s _ I D � 811 ]7 - yr '%8 I .1„9 Y 7 1 S�; 6 gam' .� M , M + .}� --L ✓,PY: n' f.ac IrV•( -aera ;w•[ [ n b- L° a R• +. J s _ _ I r • ! IgI1 /t Le Sl,..st::��1 1 � �,;' I I!/r•x+b.w wl srramr [r'ao rav lre q, r[ 7 ,•j '• 10 .aa,. ao , i' t qQ -12 08 r. r, a r>,a :o a'a "v/,t +F p°� 4 4 °•.•tea° J i.iq, ` ,/rrc __ 3AQ �11'yy}'' L /I .eYa.'.l L 1. a + , ab id/5 B ♦ ,\F 4 11 q'4 m• _m—yf�_rfi g-1za S I z s . %r �a • ` n to r{° 1 I. -. �i+-'•1�.'f\�f.� A a �= $ := a r✓,y/+.,lti °o W y, FI -:9! iF R :ti ' an +':' e e • . 'D „b• W Y•,b •aata +^•rq 6 .} a aa' r' q� _ Al ..,0 ' `•.: r•t- i "e'b„I.r Ste, xNp e a 1' + +r°. -0I /',+' 'a4 ,Y a •Aw`A+'�: R'.:..0 ' xer.a N.B 'y* aa..'ASCOT r* y/ tarau so e° ma ^,r.�j• aeo '•F., ib+ �•b > rA Wl-ou.:- - �� i s 'r I `ybs .:;�:+r:�'�,; [� , 9, •+. II •aro�8 •j 1 EQ%4R I �'1 :1 p u r'.'��',�,, ' e � a�:$• jG1.5 [H .�'. 1' • ! e Q.� T1a l >i 1 '' • y$ ,�` � �I 4 , •' [ar 1: R•I. LInw1. +u la-- L 'e�, - O� • � N. .-O+fl..g " "l11((1FF �s-'a,.•` /..a - ; n _ ori d 4 g . 193.oe kI I 1 -.lo � II +`b . � :- .. er ari• 14 0 •' H89Yo'35E �' ,�IH 1 � ? I i� + 9/\ =0 5 aL +8 ••i Zw to .7r ,gym oo __ j{o o ' yjl F• I% {° I 11 '-F.• ♦a ''•. �� ��:,e 1 8 A� m (1 .'tea � I rV 2 I •? r4�i° .'0�++iP ``� ++8 .' ,,�', `'s �s.';�ar. 12 •+a,; .;5�4a,�'.,1 " ,.,��:'.. rP e 1 r° a,se9.10'aew 11W..u L1' IY1M£Q�� CIAL 1�\t)1i .� I � h I �_ Bi .-..•xa � I a. s 1 R '4• l c r t y oil 642 l+l d i - N I l t I I t) a 1-73 'N6•• 4 � ��nsii ra ETA DEPARTMEN—TOFI[PORTATION RIGHT- .. �•�a• a �.�yy4+. ��.�gl ry. 0 K'}AY, PLAT N0.19-10. ;,._ r. • - �.� �, . _.-.-'COUNTY. _, ; STATE r,a,p AID [' ' BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR �4• • ' THOMASEGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS January 6, 1982 FRANK DEMBROSKI CHAIRMAN EAGAN HISTORY COMMITTEE 1040 MCKEE ST EAGAN MN 55121 CITY OF EAGAN )4.7195 PILOT KNOB ROAD -' ;'. P.O. BOX 71199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA ~' 5511: PHONE 454-BIDO Ai Re: Status of Eagan.History Dear Mr. Dembroski: THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE CITY CLERK In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on January 5, 1982, I was directed to write a letter to you requesting submission of the draft history sometime prior to February 2, 1982.- -The City Council would like a copy bf the history of the City of Eagan as it is written so they can analyze the written product to date and determine how much additional effort and work will be needed by the committee. The City Council is concerned that the history be completed in the next several months so it can be properly advertised and made available for sale and distribution when the new Dakota County Library facility is opened sometime this fall. Mr. Ken Damlo,, who worked on the history approximately three to four years ago, is now employed as a City accountant with the City of Eagan. I would like to schedule a meeting at your convenience with Mr. Damlo at the City Hall to discuss the status of the history; and, if necessary, Mr. Damlo would be made available to assist you in preparing a draft copy for review by the City Council. I am also anxious to hear about your adventures in Alaska during 1981. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd 7/� cc: Ken Damlo 1774 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY BEA BLOMOUIST �, !:..� �I.. �,� • wY (� �.1 .a��Vf MAYOR THOMASEGAN JAMESA. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS January 12, 1982 JOHN VOSS CITY OF EAGAN •'`,,.2193 PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O. BO% 11199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA ' SSM PHONE 4$4.9100 j^ u�! DAKOTA COUNTY COMMISSIONER'` DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 W HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 Re: Byllesby Dam Restoration Dear Commissioner Voss: THOMAS HEDGES CITY AOMINISIPAfOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLERK In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on January 5, 1982, I was directed to write a- letter of encouragement and support relating to a Dakota County Board decision to pursue restoration of the Byllesby Dam. The City of Eagan is extremely supportive of any measures taken to preserve energy alternatives for the future. Your consideration and action to renovate the old Northern States power generators as an energy source at Lake Byllesby would be most responsible. The City is aware that the Department of Natural Resources has set aside $430,000 of matching funds for the improvements, and if there is any possibility of Dakota County receiving more money in state or federal funding and if support is needed from a munici— pality within the county, please feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, Q 6� g Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd cc: Fred Joy, Dakota County Administrator /%S THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL JANUARYI9, 1982 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:33 - ADOPT AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:35 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS Q'I A. Fire Department Q•1 B. Police Department �•` C. Park Department Q•'L D. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT ITEMS [One (1:) Motion Approves All Items] A. Agreement for Implementation of 911 Emergency Number Service V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS p.q A. Project 350 - Proposed Sanitary Sewer, Water, Storm Sewer & Street Improvements to Oster Addition & Lots 2-4, Treffle Acres p 3b B. Project 352 - Proposed Water Improvements to Shorland Road & Norvin Oaks IV. OLD BUSINESS I _ Dt(o A. Midwestern Association, Orrin Aune, For Preliminary Plat Approval Q Lone Oak -Heights & Variance to Exceed the Lot Coverage in Part of the NE'y of the NEk of Section 9 6 O B. Amcon Corporation (Patrick M. Gannon) for Rezoning from A Q (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development District) to allow 2 Office Buildings & Hotel Complex; for the Preliminary Plat of Ravine Plaza; and for a Variance to Exceed the Height Limitation in a Commercial District; Located in Part of the NE'y of the NE'k of Section 4 (South of Proposed I-494 Right -of -Way & West of Pilot Knob Road) 60 C. Burnet Realty (Leonard MacKinnon) for a Conditional Use Permit e for a Pylon Business Sign on Property Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedarview Addition, 4655 Nicols Road Q 6 D. Gravel Pit License Annual Renewal - Arnold Leitner VII. ORGANIZATIONAL (1982) Q• 6S A. Acting Mayor 6% F. Q (oj e' B. C. Legal Newspaper City Depositories 06 G. Q bb Q D. Official Posting (.$H. V-10 6G i Places 67 E. Advisory Planning Commissionf?740J. & Advisory Park & Recreation Committee Appointments Health Officer City Council Meetings Committee Appointments (Council) Fiscal Consultant Legal Consultant Eagan City Council Agenda January 19, 1982 Page Two VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Richard Nordlund for a Preliminary Plat for a Day Care Center (Kinder Care) and for a Conditional Use Permit for a Day Care Center in a Portion of Pilot Knob Heights in Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Pilot Knob Heights lst Addition, NWk of the SWk of Section 15 n �Op B. Richard Norlund for the Scheduling of a Public Hearing to Consider Industrial Revenue Bond Financing in the Amount of $325,000 for "Kinder Care" p gyp% C. Edmund B. Dunn of Blackhawk Park Associates for Rezoning from A ` (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development District) to Include Limited Business and Townhouse and Condominium Development and for. Preliminary Plat Approval of Knob Hill of Eagan, Consisting of Approximately 40 Acres Located in Part of the SE'y of the SE'k of Section 21 D. Kathleen M. Schwanz for a Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Q' Beauty Shop in a Residential Area Located on Lot 5, Block 3, Saddlehor.n Addition in Section 25, 4283 Stirrup St. Q\3 E. Wesley Medin for Waiver of Plat in Order to Split a 2.3 Acre Parcel into 2 Single Family Lots Located in Part of the NE'k of the SW'y of Section 34 �•�3� F. Amusement Device Application - Coachman Oaks Apartments p \540 C. Project 353, Receive/Approve Feasibility Report (T.H. 55 Utility \� Revisions & Signals) IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS tA52. A. Public Works Supervisory Salary Schedule/1982 X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 15, 1982 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION Girl Scout Troop #191, Donelle Hallman, Girl Scout Troop Leader, has asked for time on the City Council agenda to present Girl Scout Cookies to the Mayor and City Council. Girl Scouts will be present at 6:30 p.m. AGENDA I &` MINUTESF. After approval of the January 5, 1982 regular City Council minutes, special minutes of the January 12, 1982 special Council meeting and adoption of the January 19, 1982 City Council agenda, the fol- lowing items are in order for consideration: D,EPA'RTMENTr , HE'AD'1" BUSITNES FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Fire Department at this time. POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Police Department at this time. PARK DEPARTMENT C. Park Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Park Department at this time. Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Two L PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D. Public Works Department -- Item #1: Safari Estates 4.0 MG Water Reservoir - Sieg Site -- _'fie Public Works epartment as been continuing with its negotiation for acquisition of a site to construct a proposed 4.0 MG water reservoir for our high pressure zone which will be needed in 1982/83. After unsuccessful attempts to acquire sites in the Dakota County park reserve and Apple Valley, the Public Works Department is now pursuing the third alternative of a location just west of Safari Estates adjacent to the City's south boundary with Apple Valley located within the Sieg property. Recently, the City's consulting engineer and Public Works Director met with the realtor representing the Siegs' interest to discuss possible acquisition. The realtor has recommended that the City prepare a formal purchase agreement so that he may present this to the Siegs for formal consideration. Enclosed on page � is a proposed site plan for the location of this reservoir anc"its necessary access drive. It requires a total of 1.92 acres of permanent acquisition and 0.6 acres of temporary construction easements for slope construction. The staff would like to receive concurrence of an amount to offer the Siegs in this purchase agree- ment to be presented for their consideration. Presently, the City has a standard of acquiring easements at the rate of $2,000 per acre for temporary and $4,000 per acre for permanent. This would result in a purchase agreement offer of $8,880 for both permanent and temporary easements. Acquisition of a site is guaranteed by a maximum bond of $50,000 as provided for by Byron Watchke as a part of the development agreement for the Safari Estates plat. Although the cost for the acquisition of the site is guaranteed by Byron Watchke, it is felt that Council should approve any and all offers made for the acquisition of this site as payment would be made by the City with reimbursement through the letter of credit. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny a pur- chase agreement offer in the amount of $8,880 to be presented to the Siegs for possible acquisition of a required reservoir site. `, ' SIEG RESERVOIR SITE SCALE: I�=100 I c� N I M vi az 0 50 u 260' w cn w RESERVOIR tai - 0 SITE acn -to 0 N i N 1.5 ACRES a w 3d PERMANENT EASEMENT6 � 0.42 ACRES -- 260' 31 2 �--- ---650=- - -15 SOUTH LINE SECTION 31 � &POL-m VAII-C-Y /EA&AIN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION C otLpo 2Arc C30U KDARy EASEMENT Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Three Item #2: Special Assessment Deferment Request - Ann Pietsch -- -A_t__tFe_ March 31, 1981 6peciaiAssessment Committee meeting, a request was received from Mr. Fred Pietsch of 4275 Dodd Road re- questing deferment of assessments associated with Project 241 due to a financial hardship. Although he did not qualify under Ordi- nance #66 as a senior citizen, his hardship was based on the fact that he has not been gainfully employed due to a physical disability which was verified by his physician in a written letter to the Special Assessment Committee. The Special Assessment Committee recommended that, because of the financial hardship and physical disability, the assessments be postponed for one year with recon- sideration to be given to future postponements based upon additional information indicating continued hardship. This recommendation was presented and accepted by the Council at their meeting of April 7, 1981. Because the first year's installment had already been based on the 1981 tax rolls, the City issued payment directly to Dakota County for the 1981 installments relating to special assess- ments for Project 241. Copies of correspondence are enclosed on pages r through ( which inform Mr. & Mrs. Pietsch of the need for reverificatio-n--o-F—the hardship. On page 7 is a copy of a letter submitted by Mrs. Ann Pietsch requesting consideration of continued deferment of the assessment due to a financial hardship only. Since the Special Assessment Committee meeting, it appears that Mr. and Mrs. Pietsch have separated and Mr. Pietsch no longer requests deferment of the assessment based on his physical disa- bility as he no longer resides at that address. This information is being directed to the Council for their consideration and possi- ble action. This item is being directly to the Council's attention due to the fact that it is the only item that the Public Works Department has received Dertaining to special assessments at this time. Also, Mrs. Pietsch is requesting expeditious action on her request due to the fact that her mortgage company will very shortly be initiating en escrow account on her monthly payments to cover the outstanding special assessments of record as levied against the property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the defer- ment request by Mrs. Pietsch for a specific period of time or for- ward this item for consideration by the Special Assessment Committee. 0 F1 BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMASEGAN MARK PARRANTO JAMES A. SMITH THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS October 20, 1981 MR & MRS FREDERICK PIETSCH 4275 DODD RD EArAN MN 55123 CITY..OF, LAGAN y'•'3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O. BOX 21199 „EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE 4$4.8100 �.qKl Re: Project 241, Deferent of Special Assessments Dear Mr. & Mrs. Pietsch: THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENEVAN OVERSEKE CITY CLERK As you may recall, you had previously requested of the Special Assessment Committee consideration of deferent of the special assessments based on a hardship due to Mr. Pietsch being unemployed resulting from medical disabilities. Based on vour hardship request, the City Council approved deferment cf the special assessments with the un- derstanding that the City would make payment for the special assessments already le- vied to be collected in 1981. The City has previously made payment for the first half of the special assessments which were due in May of 1981. The second half pay- ment was with the understanding that the hardship situation still exists. Therefore, would you please resubmit your existing situation pertaining to a continuation of ! this hardship so that the City may process this second half payment of special assess- ments. Also, this verification of continued hardship will be required in order to continue the deferment of this special assessment which will be due and collectable in 1982. This verification of hardship must include a letter from the attending phy-.ician verifying the continued medical disability exists which was the basis for granting this hardship request. If you have any questions pertaining to this, please feel free to contact me. We would appreciate your response by November 15th if at all possible. Sincerely, Cop omas A. lbert, P.F.. Director of Public Works TAC/jack THE LONE OAK TREE. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY, SS1]1 November 25, 1981 .• PHONE nsa-eloo iL MRS FREDRICK PIETSCH 4275 DODD ROAD EAGAN MN 55123,, Re: Project 241, Deferment of Special Assessments - Parcel No. 10-65800_010-02 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Pietsch: On October 20, 1981, a letter was sent to your attention indicating that the second half of the 1981 payment for special assessments levied in association with the above - referenced project number based on your submitting verification of the continuation of the hardship that was evident at the time the City Council agreed to defer your special assessments. We had requested this information to be received by November 15 so that the City could process this second half payment within the proper time frame. Although no response was received by the requested date, the City processed the second half pay- ment of your special assessments in good faith that it would be forthcoriing. . Ha•7ever, before continued deferment of these assessments can be provided for, we must receive this verification of continued hardship in the form of a letter from the at- tending physician verifying the continued medical disability of Mr. Pietsch, which was the basis for granting the original hardship request pertaining to deferment of special assessments. Please be informed that the special assessments as originally levied still remains as a matter of record against your parcel, and as such, will continue to show up on your next tax statement which will be due and payable to the County Auditor by May, 1982. Therefore, your deferment of special assessments is no longer in effect as a result of lack of verification of hardship. SincerellyJ, /1 71Lmnas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public hbrks -TAC/jack cc - Ann Goers, Special Assessment Clerk 10 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR THOMAS EGAN CITY OF EAGAN EUGENE N N O E VAOVERBEKE MARK PAR TO CITY JAMES A. SMITH '- THEODORE WACHTER 3195 PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMBERS P.O. BOX 21199 ' EAGAN, MINNESOTA SS1]1 November 25, 1981 .• PHONE nsa-eloo iL MRS FREDRICK PIETSCH 4275 DODD ROAD EAGAN MN 55123,, Re: Project 241, Deferment of Special Assessments - Parcel No. 10-65800_010-02 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Pietsch: On October 20, 1981, a letter was sent to your attention indicating that the second half of the 1981 payment for special assessments levied in association with the above - referenced project number based on your submitting verification of the continuation of the hardship that was evident at the time the City Council agreed to defer your special assessments. We had requested this information to be received by November 15 so that the City could process this second half payment within the proper time frame. Although no response was received by the requested date, the City processed the second half pay- ment of your special assessments in good faith that it would be forthcoriing. . Ha•7ever, before continued deferment of these assessments can be provided for, we must receive this verification of continued hardship in the form of a letter from the at- tending physician verifying the continued medical disability of Mr. Pietsch, which was the basis for granting the original hardship request pertaining to deferment of special assessments. Please be informed that the special assessments as originally levied still remains as a matter of record against your parcel, and as such, will continue to show up on your next tax statement which will be due and payable to the County Auditor by May, 1982. Therefore, your deferment of special assessments is no longer in effect as a result of lack of verification of hardship. SincerellyJ, /1 71Lmnas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public hbrks -TAC/jack cc - Ann Goers, Special Assessment Clerk 10 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Four 0 There is one (1) item on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss this item in further detail, the item should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. 911 EMERGENCY SERVICE AGREEMENT A. Agreement for Implementation of 911 Emergency Number Service -- The City has received a copy of an agreement from the Dakota County Board of Commissioners stating that the County Board of Commissioners will pay the $22,367 installation and equipment cost for the 911 emergency operational system. Apparently, installation of the equipment will begin within the next thirty days. The only cost to the City at this time will be $660 for providing the electrical installation required in the Police Department basement. The agreement is in order for execution by the City Council. It is essential the City move ahead with execution of this agreement and installation of the 911 equipment to comply with action taken by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners and the mandate of the state legislature. If study, once completed, examining the feasibility of having the Dakota County Sheriff's Department provide the dispatching for the City of Eagan and that alternative is found to be more feasible, this cost will become a minor consideration in long term economics. If the decision, after completion of the study, is to retain the police dispatching service at a City level, the 911 emergency system will be in operation as required by the state. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve and authorize execution by the Mayor and City Clerk of an agreement for the imple- mentation of the 911 emergency number service. Action is also in order to approve the low proposal for electrical installation required in the Police Department basement for this equipment to Bob Johnson Electric Company in the amount of $660. Special Note: The minutes will indicate two separate motions on these items even though they were combined into one agenda item. L.-61 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Five PROJECT 350 0 A. Project 350, Oster Addition Utilities -- In response to a peti- tion received from the developers and an adjacent property owner in Treffle Acres, a feasibility report was prepared and presented to the Council on December 1, 1981 for a public hearing to be scheduled for January 19. All notices have been placed in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners. At the time of preliminary plat approval, there were concerns pertaining to landscaping for this proposed subdivision due to the configura- tion of this subdivision and the double fronted lots that were created with the backyards fronting on Skyline Drive. Enclosed on pages through JZ, are copies of the landscaping plan that has beA submitted. -Tt should be noted that the proposed street to serve the Oster Addition has been located directly opposite of the driveway of Ms. Virginia Harrington (Lot 4, Treffle Acres). This should eliminate the concern that Mrs. Harrington had of headlights shining in her bedroom window as traffic would now be directly aligned with her garage. In addition, the developer is proposing to provide two black hill spruce and one Colorado spruce trees in Mrs. Harrington's yard to help diminish the impact of headlights. The only recommendation the staff would make after reviewing this landscaping plan is that several of the proposed black hill spruce trees should be relocated from the west plat line adjacent to the park to the south boundaries of this plat to help screen the backyard areas that would be adjacent to Skyline Drive. The feasibility report is enclosed on pages J3 through 3 5 In response to a written request by Mrs. Harrington, this feasi- bility report includes an alternate providing for utility service to her lot (Lot 4) and also Lot 3 to determine cost feasibilities for their information. It should be noted in the report that two alternates were proposed for the upgrading of Skyline Drive. The first one would propose installation of concrete curb and gutter adjacent to the Oster Addition only with a first stage 27 foot wide 1'k" bituminous mat only. Under this proposal, all costs associated with construction would be the financial responsibility of the Oster Addition. Under the alternate, if utility services are provided to Lot 3 and 4 of Treffle Acres, no future construction for utilities would be anticipated, thereby allowing the full construction of Skyline Drive to its ultimate section as a part of this project. This would provide a concrete curb and gutter on both sides to the stan- dard 32 foot wide width and 2 lifts of bituminous surfacing. Under this alternate, the lots in Treffle Acres would then be assessed their fair share of street construction based on benefit received, rd 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Six 0 as determined by a per lot equivalent share of the total street construction. The staff will have various cost alternates available based on per lot cost as compared to front foot cost due to exces- sive frontage of the lots in the Treffle Acres. The Public Works Director will discuss in further detail this feasibility report at the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve or deny Project 350 for streets and utilities to the Oster Addition. /0 !v::Rr Al KE`/ TAT EE SYM_ OLS_ 01 C.0 Fd ,1 ,leL- , I l a AmUR... MAP4F....... ACeR G-nvivALA �i CI A P _ , .5AIJE- ('-)LEN I hiI -LE . Acm PLATAPOJDES RnE GLfAf l �) 1rA. lo l�}rN6EA vvNyMVs �L)Wq 1U5 r1L. FU5 /a „ i'�� µ W IAOPA- C(LA3 ? f P.AOMANT CRAB I"1nt-L)s � F)LRCK C,' -E wLp2,'1 t)C) S PIZI:GE------ Ise e•H vUwC.:, �i)r•�C>EI�� vLaltY:iY I .5 'Li i�;�G _ _hSGcf i� -- ILIC� '�o 0 juy V J i U I; L; J74 i ' I KE`/ TAT EE SYM_ OLS_ comr-low NnrALE- NI -CAL dJA .4 ,leL- l a AmUR... MAP4F....... ACeR G-nvivALA A P _ 3 .5AIJE- ('-)LEN I hiI -LE . Acm PLATAPOJDES RnE GLfAf l �) 1rA. lo l�}rN6EA vvNyMVs �L)Wq 1U5 r1L. FU5 /a „ i'�� µ W IAOPA- C(LA3 P.AOMANT CRAB I"1nt-L)s � F)LRCK C,' -E wLp2,'1 t)C) S PIZI:GE------ Ise e•H vUwC.:, �i)r•�C>EI�� vLaltY:iY I .5 'Li i�;�G _ _hSGcf -- 343 4 Z3 v4 -v - C 06 D N Wqo"'/ew 52-7-S4 12,003 A as -ear T AL .7-47 'A 4''51 A I IJ &I j 113.41 r"t, -Sark.3 IV 6.9� %FV' 46, N h > IV )j.xS IAP 67. 3t so K &0 /2, C6 3- 9. 7c. A Ar ar A= a -33' X4' 4 al-s"S3 I, a 000 ayY 0 0 0 o 0 PA 0)1 �3 PP4 lAf ��Tc. o 3 Pm Al 89-S1'i2"W g,"iL EGD REPORT ON OSTER ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 350 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1981 /3aftedWa, Rte, 4,de1dz 9 4aeoc&,&d, 9,w. e&v&diwq C, St P"4 m4ftm D& 13 4,i,1" & 4",oe-41&4r Am giOa A"ala p t "Oyes d O 2333 *4 9.._. #VA.. 36 81. PA.w.: 612.636-4600 November 13, 1981 0(S 1956 - �th - 1981 �}D nniversary Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 Re: Oster Addition Utilities and Streets Project 350 Our File No. 49243 Dear Mayor and Council: Ulf. G. Rannuoo. Y.E. Rabrrf W. Horum. P.E. Jnuph V. Anderlik. P.E. lbndfard A. Lemberg. P.E. Rlrhard E. tumrr, P.L. Jw..n C. Olrnn. P.E. Transmitted herewith is our report for Oster Addition, Project 350 report covers street and utility construction for Oster Addition. Glynn R. Cook. P.E. K,,fh A. Gordon. P.E. 7hon.a+ E. Nay,,, P.E. Rlrhard W. Fwler, P.E. Robes G. Srhurdrhf. P.E. .Af.,tm L. Sorrala. P.E. Oonald C. Rurgardf. P.E. Jerry A. Hourdo.. P.E. Afark A. Hamar., P.E. Clmrla A. Erlrkran Lt. Af. Pewd by Had.. H. OW" M,ld E. Ofm This We will be pleased to meet with the Council and 'other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Respectfully submitted, BONESTR_0g0, RROOSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark R. Rolfs MRR:11 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: November 13, 1981 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: / T omas A. Colbert Director of Public Works Date: //—a?3—P 7243a /+ 0 0 OSTER ADDITION SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, services, storm sewer, and streets to serve the Oster Addition. Also included is an alternate (Appendix C) which provides for utility service and street surfacing to Lots 2, 3, and 4 in Treffle Acres located south of Skyline Drive. The Oster Addition consists of nine single family units located in the SE 1/4 of Section 4 in the NW intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Skyline Drive. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible as it relates to en— gineering matters and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. This project is based on the premise that the developer will perform all grading and subsoil correction to City standards prior to the City performing the work referenced in this report. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as two contracts. Contract I pro— vides for the construction of all utilities and the placement of an aggregate base on a properly prepared subgrade. Contract II provides for the construction of the remaining portion of the aggregate base and placement of a bituminous surface in conjunction with the concrete curb and gutter. DISCUSSION: CONTRACT I A. SANITARY SEWER: An 8 inch P.V.C. sanitary sewer is proposed to serve the Oster Addition as shown on Figure 1 at the back of this report. The sewer will be located within Oster Drive in order to provide service to the nine — 1 — 7243a 0 0 lots located within Oster Addition. The proposed sanitary sewer will connect to an existing 8" plug located on the westerly right-of-way line of County Road 31 installed under Project 334 in 1981. Lots 2 b 3 will require addi- tional fill to provide gravity service to the sanitary sewer due to limiting elevations of the existing lateral in Pilot Knob Road. Detailed grading and design plans will determine the extent of fill required. B. WATER MAIN: A 6 inch D.I.P. water main is proposed to service the Oster Addition as shown on Figure 2 at the back of this report. The water main will be constructed along Oster Drive in order to provide service to the nine lots located within Oster Addition. The proposed water main will connect to an ex- isting 6" plug located on the westerly right-of-way line of County Road 31 in- stalled under Project 334 in 1981. As part of this project, the proposed water main will be continued west along Skyline Drive from its intersection with Oster Drive to the west edge of the plat. The water main will be looped in the future by continuing west from this point along Skyline Drive and con- necting to an existing 6" Plug located between lots 7 and 8 in the Rustic Hills Addition approximately 2,700 feet to the west. C. SERVICES: This construction provides for the installation of sanitary sewer and water services to a point 15' beyond the property lines within Oster Addition. Sanitary sewer services are proposed to be 4 inch P.V.C. pipe, and water services to be 1 inch copper tubing. D. STORM SEWER: It is proposed to construct a 15" R.C.P. storm sewer from the existing 15" plug located on the westerly right-of-way line of County Road 31 (installed under Project 334 in 1981) to the low point on Oster Drive as shown on Figure 3 at the back of this report. Storm runoff will be collected at the low point with two catch basins and a 12" storm sewer lead. - 2 - 7243a 16 0 0 E. STREET (Grading/Agg. Base): This construction provides for the proper grading of the subgrade surface after installation of utilities on Oster Drive and on Skyline Drive from its intersection with County Road 31 to the west edge of the proposed plat. Grading is to be followed by placement of a 4 inch aggregate base. The aggregate base thickness assumes that a reasonable sub - grade exists or can be provided with a minimum amount of correction. CONTRACT II F. STREET (Surfacing): This construction provides for the placement of the remaining 2 inches of the aggregate base followed by construction of the bi- tuminous surface in conjunction with surmountable concrete curb and gutter. Because future utility construction within Skyline Drive right-of-way is re- quired to service Lots 3, 4 b 5, it is proposed to surface only a 27 foot width of the first 1-1/2 inches of bituminous mat on Skyline Drive and to place concrete curb and gutter on the north side only. The remaining street construction in Skyline Drive would then be completed as a part of that future utility project servicing Lots 3 6 4 of Treffle Acres. (See discussion under Appendix C, page 12.) _Oster Drive is to be surfaced with a 30 foot width of two 1-1/2 inch lifts of bituminous surface and concrete curb and gutter. The proposed street surfacing is shown on Figure 4 at the back of this report. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Assessment Area Construction Area Part of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 Part of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 4 of Section 4 Parcel 040-75 Parcel 040-75 - 3 - 7243a 17 0 0 COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates for the facilities described in this report are presented in Appendix A at the end of this report. A summary of these costs are as follows: Contract I Sanitary Sewer $11,400 Water Main 15,800 Services 8,920 Storm Sewer 77 Qin Street (Grading/Agg. Base) 11,000 Total Estimated Project Cost - Contract I $59,030 Contract II Street (Surfacing) 32,200 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST - CONTRACTS I 6 II ...... $91,230 The total estimated cost for Contract I and Contract II including con- struction, contingencies, and all related overhead is $91,230. Overhead costs are estimated to be 27% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. EASEMENTS: A thirty (30) foot permanent easement is required for utility con- struction within Oster Addition. This easement is located between lots 6 and 7 and extends from tke Oster Drive cul-de-sac to the westerly right-of-way line of Co. Rd. 31. A fifty (50) foot temporary construction easement is also required along this same line. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments for utility and street construction are proposed to be levied against benefited property in Oster Addition. Trunk sanitary sewer and trunk water main have been previously assessed under Project No. 10 and 49, respectively. - 4 - 7243a Is 0 0 Trunk storm sewer has not been previously assessed and is therefore pro- posed to be assessed as part of this project. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report. Final assessment rates for construc- tion of lateral facilities will be determined from the final costs and as- sessed accordingly to the benefited property. Trunk storm sewer rates in effect at the time of this publication are as follows: Trunk Storm Sewer - Single Family .......................$0.0374/sq.ft. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Trunk Fund - 5 - 7243a 19 Project Cost Revenue Balance SANITARY SEWER Lateral $11,400 i Lateral $11,400 TOTAL $11,400 $11,400 - 0 - WATER MAIN Lateral $15,800 Lateral Assessment $15,800 TOTAL $15,800 $15,800 - 0 - SERVICES Lateral $ 8,920 Lateral Assessment $ 8,920 TOTAL $ 8,920 $ 8,920 - 0 - - 5 - 7243a 19 9 0 STORM SEWER Lateral $11,910 Lateral Assessment $11,910 Trunk — 0 — Trunk Assessment 4,388 TOTAL $11,910 $16,298 +$ 4,388 STREET Grading/Agg. Base $11,000 Surfacing 32,200 Street Assessment $43,200 TOTAL $43,200 $43,200 — 0 — No revenue is required from the City's trunk fund for utility or street construction. A positive trunk fund balance of $4,388 is anticipated for storm sewer. PROJECT SCHEDULE Contract I Contract II Present Feasibility Report Dec. 1, 1981 Dec. 1, 1981 Public Hearing _ Jan. 19, 1982 Jan. 19, 1982 Approve Plans 6 Specifications March, 1982 April, 1982 Open Bids April, 1982 May, 1982 Award Contract April, 1982 May, 1982 Construction Completion July, 1982 August, 1982 Assessment Hearing Sept., 1982 Sept., 1982 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1983 May, 1983 — 6 — 7243a 20 0 A. SANITARY SEWER APPENDIX A COST ESTIMATE OSTER ADDITION PROJECT 350 CONTRACT I UTILITIES AND GRADING 420 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 8'-10' dp. in pl. @ $11.00/lin.ft. $ 4,620 2 Each Std. MH w/casting in pl. @ $900.00/each 1,800 2 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' @ $80.00/lin.ft. 160 9 Each 8 x 4 PVC wye branch in pl. @ $50.00/each 450 1 Each Cut into existing 8" plug @ $100.00/each 100 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 420 Lin.ft. Mechanical Trench Compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 420 0.25 Acres Seed with topsoil @ $2,800.00/acre 700 Total Estimated Construction $ 8,550 +5% Contingency 430 $ 8,980 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 2,420 TOTALSANITARY SEWER ............................... $ 11,400 7 - 7243a 2,1 B. WATER MAIN 650 Lin.ft. 6" DIP, 7' cover @ $12.00/lin.ft. $ 7,800 2 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each 1,800 1 Each 6" Resilient Wedge Gate Valve & Box @ $400.00/each 400 800 Lbs. C.I. Fittings in pl. @ $1.00/lb. 800 1 Each Connect to ex. 6" plug @ $100.00/each 100 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 650 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 650 Total Estimated Construction $ 11,850 +5% Contingency 590 $ 12,440 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 3,360 TOTAL WATER MAIN ................................. $ 15,800 C. SERVICES 450 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary Sewer Service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 2,700 450 Lin.ft. 1" Type K copper water service @ $5.00/lin.ft. 2,250 9 Each 1" Corporation stop @ $40.00/each 360 9 Each 1" Curb stop & box @ $70.00/each 630 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 450 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 450 Total Estimated Construction $ 6,690 +5% Contingency 335 $ 7,025 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 1,895 TOTALSERVICES ................................... $ 8,920 - 8 - 7243a 22 0 D. STORM SEWER 0 300 Lin.ft. 15" RCP, Cl. V, 0'-10' dp. @$20.00/lin.ft. $ 6,000 35 Lin.ft. 12" RCP, Cl. V, 0'-10' dp. @ $17.00/lin.ft. 595 2 Each Std. CB w/casting @ $700.00/each 1,400 1 Each Connect to ex. 15" plug @ $300.00/each 300 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 335 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 335 Total Estimated Construction $ 8,930 +5% Contingency 450 $ 9,380 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 2,530 TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................. $ 11,910 E. STREET (Grading/Aggregate Base 200 Cu.yds. Subgrade Correction @ $3.50/cu.yd. $ 700 50 Cu.yds. Select Granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 300 4,000 Sq.yds. Subgrade Preparation @ $0.35/sq.yd. 1,400 900 Ton Cl. 2 Crushed Aggregate @ $6.50/ton 5,850 Total Estimated Construction $ 8,250 +5% Contingency 410 $ 8,660 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 2,340 TOTAL STREET (Grading/Agg. Base) .................. $ 11,000 - 9 - 7243a V3 0 CONTRACT I Sanitary Sewer Water Main Services 0 Storm Sewer Street (Grading/Agg. Base) TOTAL CONTRACT II ................. CONTRACT II $ 11,400 15,800 8,920 11,910 11,000 $ 59,030 F. STREET (Surfacing) 3,600 Sq.yds. Base Preparation @ $0.30/sq.yd. 450 Ton Cl. 5 gravel @ $5.00/ton 140 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @$12.00/ton 280 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton 25 Ton Bituminous material for mix @ $220.00/ton 1,300 Lin.ft. Surmountable concrete curb 6 gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft 6 Each Adjust MH S CB @ $200.00/each 1 Each Adjust gate valves b boxes @ $200.00/each 0.75 Acre Seed w/topsoil @ $2,800.00/acre Total Estimated Construction +5% Contingency +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin, b Bond Interest TOTALSTREET (Surfacing) ........................ - 10 - 7243a 24 $ 1,080 2,250 1,680 3,640 5,500 6,500 1,200 200 2,100 $ 24,150 1,210 $ 25,360 6.840 $ 32,200 0 9 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 350 OSTER ADDITION Total Rate Area Assmt. (1) Trunk Storm Sewer $0.0374/ft2 117,324 ft $4,388 — 11 — 7243a 2 s' Total Units Assessment Assessed Cost/Unit A. Sanitary Sewer $11,400 9 $ 1,267 B. Water Main 15,800 9 1,756 C. Services 8,920 9 992 D. Storm Sewer (Lateral) 11,910 9 1,323 E. Storm Sewer (Trunk)(1) 4,388 9 487 F. Street (Grading/Agg. Base) 11,000 9 1,222 G. Street (Surfacing) 32,200 9 3,578 TOTAL ...................... $95,618 $10,625 Total Rate Area Assmt. (1) Trunk Storm Sewer $0.0374/ft2 117,324 ft $4,388 — 11 — 7243a 2 s' 9 9 APPENDIX C ALTERNATE PROJECT DISCUSSION: This alternate provides for utility service to lots 3 and 4 in Treffle Acres located on the south side of Skyline Drive. Also included is the construction of Skyline Drive to a full residential width and section with concrete curb and gutter on both sides from Pilot Knob Road to the west line of Oster Addition. Only Lot 2 in Treffle Acres has sanitary sewer service while only Lots 2 b 3 have individual water services from the existing laterals on Pilot Knob Road. While Lots 3 6 4 can feasibly be serviced with sanitary sewer, Lot 5 would require below minimum grades for gravity service. Therefore, it is not pro— posed to serve Lot 5 with sanitary sewer and water as part of this alternate. To provide sanitary sewer to serve Lots 3 and 4 will require the sanitary sewer to be extended to Skyline Drive and to the east along Skyline Drive to the center of Lot 3. No additional water main construction is required to serve Lot 4. Cost estimates for_ the total cost for sanitary sewer, service, and street surfacing to serve Lots 2, 3, and 4 in Treffle Acres and the 9 lots in Oster Addition are presented in Tables 1, 2, b 3. The costs for water main, storm sewer, and street (grading/aggregate base) will remain the same as presented in Appendix A. 12 — 7243a 26 0 0 TABLE 1 SANITARY SEWER 430 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 8'-10' dp. @ $11.00/lin.ft. $ 4,730 200 Lin.ft. 8" PVC, 10'-15' dp. @ $14.00/lin.ft. 2,800 3 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 2,700 10 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' @ $80.00/lin.ft. 800 11 Each 8 x 4 PVC wye branch in pl. @ $50.00/each 550 1 Each Cut into existing 8" plug @ $100.00/each 100 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 950 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 950 0.25 Acre Seed w/topsoil @ $2,800.00/acre 700 Total Estimated Construction $ 13,630 +5% Contingency 680 $ 14,310 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin, b Bond Interest 3,870 TOTAL ALTERNATE SANITARY SEWER ..................... $ 18,180 TABLE 2 SERVICES 620 Lin.ft. 4" PVC_Sanitary Sewer Service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 3,720 550 Lin.ft. 1" Type K copper water service @ $5.00/lin.ft. 2,750 10 Each 1" Corporation stops @ $40.00/each 400 10 Each 1" Curb stops b boxes @ $70.00/each 700 50 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 650 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 650 Total Estimated Construction $ 8,520 +52 Contingency 430 $ 8,950 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 2,420 TOTAL ALTERNATE SERVICES .......................... $ 11,370 - 13 - 7243a W7 0 0 TABLE 3 STREET (Surfacin 3,600 Sq.yds. Base preparation @ $0.30/sq.yd. $ 1,080 450 Ton Cl. 5 gravel @ $5.00/ton 2,250 290 Ton 2331 Bituminous Base course @ $12.00/ton 3,480 290 Ton 2341 Bituminous Wear course @ $13.00/ton 3,770 30 Ton Bituminous material for mix. @ $220.00/ton 6,600 1,800 Lin.ft. Surmountable concrete curb b gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 9,000 6 Each Adjust MH 6 CB @ $200.00/each 1,200 1 Each Adjust gate valves b boxes @ $200.00/each 200 1.0 Acre Seed w/topsoil @ $2,800.00/acre 2,800 Total Estimated Construction $ 30,380 +5X Contingency 1,520 $ 31,900 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 8,610 TOTAL STREET (Surfacing) $ 40,510 A summary of the alternate costs as presented in Table 1, 2, and 3 includ- ing portions which did not change in Appendix A are listed as follows: CONTRACT I Sanitary Sewer $ 18,180 Water Main 15,800 Services 11,370 Storm Sewer 11,910 Street (Grading/agg. base) 11,000 Total Estimated Alternate Project Cost - CONTRACT I $ 68,260 CONTRACT II Street (Surfacing) 40,510 TOTAL ESTIMATED ALTERNATE PROJECT COST - CONTRACTS I 6 II $108,770 - 14 - 7243a :26 6 Assessments for the alternate utility and street construction are proposed to be levied against the 'benefited property in Oster Addition and against the benefited lots in Treffle Acres south of Skyline Drive. A preliminary assess- ment roll is presented in Table 4. It is not proposed as part of this alter- nate to assess Lots 2, 3, and 4 in Treffle Acres for trunk storm because their drainage is not tributary to Oster Addition. It is recommended trunk and lat- eral storm sewer be assessed to Lots 2, 3, and 4 when Skyline Drive is con- structed further west to its low point where storm sewer will be required. TABLE 4 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL ASSESSMENTS FOR LOTS IN OSTER ADDITION Total Lots Assessment Assessed A. Sanitary Sewer $ 18,180 11 B. Water Main 15,800 10 C. Services - Sanitary 5,600 11 Water 5,770 10 D. Storm Sewer 11,910 9 E. Street (Grading/Agg. Base) 11,000 12 F. Street (Surfacing) 40,510 12 G. Trunk Storm Sewer 4,388 TOTAL ASSESSMENT .............. $113,158 - 15 - 7243a 291 Cost/Lot (Oster Addn.) $ 1,653 1,580 509 577 1,323 917 3,376 488 $10,423 0 0 ASSESSMENT FOR LOTS IN TREFFLE ACRES - 16 - 7243a 30 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 A. Sanitary Sewer -- $1,653 $1,653 B. Water Main -- -- 1,580 C. Services - Sanitary -- 509 509 Water -- -- 577 D. Storm Sewer -- -- E. Street (Grading/Agg. Base) $ 917 917 917 F. Street (Surfacing) 3,376 3,376 3,376 G. Trunk Storm Sewer -- -- TOTAL ASSESSMENT ............. $4,393 $6,455 $8,612 - 16 - 7243a 30 W 49243 SKYLINE D'VE 5 4 3 2 /i TREFFLE ACRES W 49243 FIGURE NO. 1 OSTER ADDITION SANITARY SEWER i IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE. LATERAL ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY SCALE 1 1" - 100' BONES7ROO, ROSENE, ARDERUK 6 ASSOC, INC. C1111MT110 acwtus St. til, MIIne�M� - - 31 SKYLINE D'VE 5 4 3 2 TREFFLE ACRES FIGURE NO. 1 OSTER ADDITION SANITARY SEWER i IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE. LATERAL ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY SCALE 1 1" - 100' BONES7ROO, ROSENE, ARDERUK 6 ASSOC, INC. C1111MT110 acwtus St. til, MIIne�M� - - 31 w N ., N 5 4 3 2 f I • . 3 a 5 ITER 6 t) 2 6�� EX. 6" PLU U l "I OSTER ADDITION FFRI a - I9 N i Y WATERMAIN SKYLINE VE F J a • IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE " LATERAL ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY FIGURE NO. 2 • 49243 - SCALE: I" • 100' WHESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK i ASSOC. INC. CMSRITNIC ENGINEERSK. til. Ml.w. sz 5 4 3 2 x TREFFLE ACRES WHESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK i ASSOC. INC. CMSRITNIC ENGINEERSK. til. Ml.w. sz 1 49243 Ex. 15" PLUG I . E \ 7 \' 1 ° FIGURE NO. 3 •I OSTER ADDITION STORM SEWER • IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE: TRUNK AND LATERAL ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY ® TRUNK ASSESSMENT AREA SCALE : I" - 100' BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIR i ASSOC, IMC, CD11SKTMG EMMMERS S1. P.I. ffih r . R3 SKYLINE DRIVE 5 4 3 2 TREFFLE ACRES FIGURE NO. 3 •I OSTER ADDITION STORM SEWER • IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE: TRUNK AND LATERAL ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY ® TRUNK ASSESSMENT AREA SCALE : I" - 100' BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIR i ASSOC, IMC, CD11SKTMG EMMMERS S1. P.I. ffih r . R3 �•-12-�l IT FUTURE BITUMINOUS B CONCRETE CURB TYPICAL SECTION SKYLINE DRIVE FIGURE NO. 4 {.49243 J OSTER ADDITION STREETS _- • IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY SCALE ; I" - 100' BDKESWAA ROSW MDEItUK A A&M W- CDI=TM OICEIfEK St. hl. 34 SKYLINE DFIVE 5 4 3 2 TREFFLE ACRES FIGURE NO. 4 {.49243 J OSTER ADDITION STREETS _- • IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 NOTE ASSESSMENTS TO OSTER ADDITION ONLY SCALE ; I" - 100' BDKESWAA ROSW MDEItUK A A&M W- CDI=TM OICEIfEK St. hl. 34 w h 49243 FIGURE NO. 5 � o I U a OSTER ADDITION m' i ALTERNATE PROJECT a SANITARY AND STREET •, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 350 SCALE 1" = 100' KONWROO, KOSM ANDERUK A. ASSOC. INC. CORMTIIIC L/1 PV*S L,t I. Ml.mt. -24- Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Seven PROJECT 352 0 B. Project 352, Norvin Oaks and Storland Road Watermain -- In response to a petition received from the developer of Norvin Oaks, a feasibility report was prepared and presented to the Council on December 1, 1981 with a public hearing being scheduled for January 19, 1982. Because this provides for the extension of a water main to the west boundary of Norvin Oaks Subdivision only, special consideration was used to determine benefit from this water - main extension as detailed in the report. The Public Works Director will be available at the public hearing to discuss in further detail the method used by staff to determine benefit used in this project. Enclosed for your information on pages 37 through 4jc' is a copy of the feasibility report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve or deny Project 352 for the extension of watermain to Norvin Oaks along Storland Road. 36 0 ON 0 PROJECT NO. 352 EAGAN, MINNESOTA H= Ba, Rte, 4.ds4id .9 4 t ,, 9o. eq 'c st pa"4 R&mm & 37 Cl 2335 IV. 7--4 4,,A.;, 36 S1. Pd. Af. 55„3 %Gee.: 612.636.4600 November 11, 1981 Honorable Mayor and City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 ytc. O 0(� 1956 - th - 1981 nniversary Council 1E • URn G. -'..w.", mn. P.L'. Rnh,rl 11'. R. P.E. 6,1,111 C. And dlk. P.G. /IurAlu.d A. Lrmbrrg. P.E. Na'lund F. ruin,.. Y.F. Jmun C. open. P.E. G1,1111 R. Conk, P.r. Keldr A. Gardan. P.E. J]mmar E. Nny,,. P.E. Rirhard IV. Furor, PX. Rnbnl G. Srhunirhl. P.E. Alarrin L. Sonvle. P.E. Mn.ld C. RurgarJt P.E. J, -,,y A. Bourdon. P.E. ANA A. lleruon. P.P. Clmdrr, A. Erirkmn Lrn Al. Pawrb4y Nerlan Al. 01J." D.vid E. Glenn Re: Storland Road Water Main Project 352 Our File No. 49244 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our Report for the storland Road Water Main Extension, Project 352. This report covers the water main construction along Storland Road and within Norvin Oaks. We will be pleased'to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to review this report. Respectfully submitted, BONE00,OSEjjjNDE RrL�IK -- b ASSOCIATES, INC.� Ma Hanson MAA :1 i I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engine r under the laws of tthhee/ tate of MMinnesot Date: November 11, 1981 Reg. No. 14250 Approved by: Thomas A. Culbert Director of Public Works Date: 7231a M 0 STORLAND ROAD WATER MAIN SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of water main along Stor- land Road east from Slaters Road to serve the adjacent property and the pro- posed Norvin Oaks Addition. FF.ASIAiLiTY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible and is in accordance with the Master Water Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract including water main construc- tion and all restoration work. DISCUSSION: A. WATER MAIN: A 6 inch water main is proposed to be constructed on the north side of Storland Road east from Slaters Road. The water main will con- nect to an existing 6" plug located at Slaters Road. The water main will be constructed to the proposed Norvin Oaks Plat and terminate. Looping of water main is not required as part of this project. Residual pressures are anticipated being in the 30 to 40 psi range until the proposed ground reservoir on Safari Pass is constructed. Once the ground reservoir is completed residual pressures will be between 60 to 70 psi. R. SERVICES: This construction provides for the installation of water ser- vices to the three lots within Norvin Oaks. To minimize pressure losses esti- mated from 20-30 psi (due to the length of services required to service each lot) 1-1/2" services are recommended. It is estimated 20 to 30 psi would be lost if a 1 inch service were constructed which would put the residual pres- sures well below recommended levels. 7231a - 1 - 39 0 0 AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Assessment Area SW 1/4 Section 31 Parcel 011-50 Parcel 011-77 Parcel 011-55 (Norvin Oaks) 0 Construction Area SW 1/4 Section 31 Parcel 011-50 Parcel 011-77 Parcel 011-55 (Norvin Oaks) COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented at the back of this report. A sum- mary of these costs are as follows: Water Main $22,870 Services 1,060 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS ....... $23,930 The total estimated cost including contingencies and all related overhead is $23,930. Overhead costs are estimated at 27% and include legal, engineer- ing, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments for water main are proposed to be levied against the benefited property on a lineal foot basis. Because of the unusual and irregular configuration of the Norvin Oaks Addition as it pertains to frontage along public right-of-way, a combination of "front feet" and "lateral benefit from a trunk water main" was incorporated in calculating the proposed assessment for the unplatted parcels adjacent to Storland Road. The 1981 rate for lateral benefit from a trunk water main ($12.00/FF) was applied to the frontage along Storland Road (664' + 664' = 1,328 L.F.). The difference from this generated revenue and the estimated cost of the project was then divided equally among the 3 lots of Norvin Oaks. At this present rate of $12.00/F.F. 7231a - 2 - M 0 This results in an equivalent calculated assessable footage of 192 F.F. for each of the 3 lots in Norvin Oaks. This $12.00/F.F. rate will be adjusted proportionately based on the final assessment costs for construction as com- pared to the estimated costs in this report. The cost for service construc- tion was divided equally between the three lots in Norvin Oaks. Trunk water main was assessed as part of Project 254 therefore no trunk area charge is proposed to be assessed. REVENUF. SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: WATER MAIN Lateral Lateral Assessment TOTAL SERVICES Lateral Lateral Assessment TOTAL Project Cost $ 22,870 $ 22,870 $ 22,870 $ 1,060 $ 1,060 Revenue $ 22,870 $ 1,060 $ 1,060 Balance IWI_ No revenue is required from City trunk funds to finance this project. - 3 - 7231a �I 0 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans b Specifications Award Bids Construction Completion Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes — 4 — 7231a 42 0 November 17, 1981 December 15, 1981 Winter, 1982 Winter, 1982 May, 1982 Summer, 1982 May, 1983 0 A. WATER MAIN APPENDIX A COST ESTIMATE STORLAND ROAD WATER MAIN PROJECT 352 0 940 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water Main @ $14.00/lin.ft. $ 10,640 2 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,275.00/each 2,550 1 Each 6" Gate Valve and Box @ $350.00/each 350 650 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.00/lb. 650 1 Each Remove 6" plug and connect 6" dIP @ $200.00/each 200 100 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 600 30 Lin.ft. Remove and reinstall 36" CMP culvert @ $10.00/lin.ft. 300 60 Ton Class 5 aggregate base 100% crushed @ $6.00/ton 360 1.0 Acre Seed with topsoil and mulch @ $1,500.00/acre 1,500 Total Estimated Construction $ 17,150 +5% Contingency 860 $ 18,010 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 4.860 TOTALWATER MAIN .................................... $ 22,870 SERVICES 60 Lin.ft. 1-1/2" Type "K" copper water service @ $5.00/lin.ft. $ 300 3 Each 1-1/2" Corporatin stop @ $75.00/each 225 3 Each 1-1/2" Curb stop and box @ $90.00/each 270 Total Estimated Construction $ 795 +5% Contingency 40 $ 835 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 225 TOTALSERVICES ...................................... $ 1,060 7231a. OR 0 0 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL STORLAND ROAD WATER MAIN PROJECT 352 November 11, 1981 A. WATER MAIN Norvin Oaks Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 SW 1/4 Section 31 Parcel 011-50 Parcel 011-77 7231a SUMMARY TOTAL..................... UJI Assessment $ 2,311 2,311 2,311 $ 7,968 7.968 $22,870 Total Assessment $ 2,664 2,664 2,664 $ 7,968 7.968 $23,930 Assessable Estimated Footage Rate/F.F. Norvin Oaks Lot l 192' $12.00/f.f. Lot 2 192' $12.00/f.f. Lot 3 192' $12.00/f.f. SW 1/4 Section 31 Parcel 011-50 664' $12.00/f.f. Parcel 011-77 664' $12.00/f.f. TOTAL 1,906 B. SERVICES Norvin Oaks Assessment Lot 1 $ 353 Lot 2 353 Lot 3 353 $1,06-0 Norvin Oaks Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 SW 1/4 Section 31 Parcel 011-50 Parcel 011-77 7231a SUMMARY TOTAL..................... UJI Assessment $ 2,311 2,311 2,311 $ 7,968 7.968 $22,870 Total Assessment $ 2,664 2,664 2,664 $ 7,968 7.968 $23,930 W f7 Q F Z 0 a: U. SCalB , -cvv a 0 I '�vn- 1. EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATER MAIN PROJECT N04 352 BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSM INC PONSULTING ERORIEERS S St. Peal, Mlceeeete LATERAL ASSESSMENT (Front Footage) COMM 49244 • Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Eight i PRELIMINARY PLAT/LONE OAK HEIGHTS A. Midwestern Associates, Orrin Aune, for Preliminary Plat Approval of Lone Oak Heights & Variance to Exceed the Lot Coverage -- For sake of history, a public hearing was held before the APC at their regular meeting held on September 22, 1981 to consider a preliminary plat entitled Lone Oak Heights consisting of approximately 145 dwelling units and a variance to exceed the lot coverage require- ments in a residential district. The APC recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to fifteen (15) different condi- tions. This item was then heard by the City Council at the October 20, 1981 meeting. A motion was made and seconded, with all members voting in favor except City Councilmember Wachter who voted no, that read as follows, "The motion to continue the consideration of the application until November 17, 1981 and that the Council authorize the hiring of an appraiser to prepare a brief report as to the probable cost incurred by the City, in the event that the Council should determine that the portion of the property should be downzoned to a lower density from an R-4 to an R-3 and further, to determine the additional cost of rezoning to R-1 or some R-2 buffer areas; further, to allow the staff to continue to study the project including the density determination; further to deter- mine whether to include the private street in determining the den- sity of the project." The appraisal work was not completed prior to the 11-17-81 meeting, and, therefore, a second continuance was given until the December 15, 1981 meeting. A number of issues were discussed at that meeting, which raised several questions re- quiring review and study by City staff. These questions have been addressed by the City Attorney and City Planner. Questions re- garding downzoning as it relates to the Martin Shields' property have been addressed by the City Attorney in a memorandum found on pages47 through 4$ The developer has revised the plan in order that no variances for density or lot coverage will be required with the preliminary plat. For a revised report as pre- pared by the City Planner, refer to pages through s Again, copies of the APC minutes from the Septem er 22, 1981 meeting are enclosed on pages�4 through S& for your review. Also included in each City ounci packet -a—re---t-he new drawings for the proposed preliminary plat of Lone Oak Heights Addition. Large drawings are included without a page number. Reductions of these drawings are found on pages S % through Sc? . If members of the City Council desire any of the information that was passed out in the December 15, 1981 City Council packet that included a copy of the appraiser's report and original City Planner's report, feel free to contact the City Administrator's office and that in- formation will be made available as a part of the administrative packet. Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Nine ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the recom- mendation of the APC. Special Note: It is the option of the City Council if there are changes proposed by the developer and or resi- dents that the City Council feels are significant enough to hold a public hearing to refer the plat back to the APC for additional review. The trailer was removed from the property as requested by the City Council the week after the December 15, 1981 meeting. M. 0 • PAUL H. HAUGE Bit ASSOCIATES. P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA $3122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 January 8, 1981 AREA CODE 812 TELEPHONE 4$4.4224 RE: Downzoning - Mr. & Mrs. Martin Shields Property (Lone Oak Heights) Dear Tom: We have been asked to discuss the possibility of downzoning the Martin Shields property at the Southwest corner of Lone Oak and Pilot Knob Roads in response to community objections to the development of a condominium and townhouse com- plex. The current zoning of the property is Planned Development with under- lying R-3 covering `_,Iacres and R-4 covering 5_y acres. There appear to be at least three basic issues: 1. Can the City Council legally downzone the property and if so, how could it be accomplished? 2. Is the City responsible for damages if the City downzones the property? 3. If the City downzones, can Mr. Shields demand the return of the property that he sold and dedicated to the City as park land at the time of the R-3 and R-4 rezoning,in 1975? It appears that in 1974 the City of Eagan finalized negotiations with Mr. and Mrs. Martin Shields for the purchase and dedication of park land as requested by residents of that area of Eagan and provided in the City's park plan. The Agreement provided that Mr. Shields sell approximately 6 acres and dedicate an additional 4 acres to fulfill the City's park dedication requirements for the balance of the Shields' property east and west of Pilot Knob Road. An additional provision of that purchase agreement is the source of much con- cern at recent hearings for development of Mr. Shields' property. The purchase agreement provision stated that the sellers "will proceed with the rezoning" of the remaining 17 acres. It was "understood" that if rezoning was not com- pleted within 60 days of the purchase agreement, the seller had the right to revoke the purchase agreement. The provision appears to be worded so as to avoid a promise of rezoning or future zoning. It merely gave the sellers the right to back out if rezoning was not allowed at that time and place. This is based upon the theory of municipal law that a Council cannot bargain away its police powers (zoning is one) or bind a future Council in regard to legislative functions. 4-7 0 0 Mr. Thomas Hedges January 8, 1982 Page 2 Can the City now downzone the property in "breach" (as has been argued) of its agreement with the owner? The answer appears to be yes. While this office has not gone into great depth on the subject, it appears from the facts at hand that the general rule of law would apply. Zoning is a police power which cannot be contracted away. Rezoning is a legislative function of City Govern- ment meaning that a decision of one Council will not generally bind future Councils. It is important to note that the proponement of rezoning is obliged to provide a rational for rezoning based on the public good and general welfare. Reasons such as extreme density causing overburdening utilities and park land, traffic congestion, safety, etc. could be reasons. There is still a problem with damages should the Council decide to downzone. Will the City be responsible for damages or can the owner take back the park land for "breach" of the agreement? We cannot be sure that a Court and/or jury might not find that the owner had been misled by the agreement and should not suffer loss due to his reliance on it. In conclusion, it appears that the City Council has the power to downzone. There is a possibility of liability for damages if the Court found that there was a contract to rezone although our interpretation of the specific agreement is that there was no promise other than the right of the owner to renege if the property were not rezoned by a certain date. The loss of the park land seems unlikely since the owner was paid for a portion and there would still be dedi- cation requirements if the land were developed. This issue was not researched, however. Sincerely, V David G. Keller DGK:ras Lone Oak Heights Revision January 13, 1982 Page two The applicant has looked at the possibility of shifting Shield's Lane more easterly into the center of the plat. once you start shifting Shield's Lane easterly, then you have two setbacks to consider and the overall parcel is very difficult to construct dwelling units and parking and retain the setbacks between the new alignment of Shield's Lane and the existing property lines. Therefore, the location of Shield's Iane and the present location gives the greater flexibility for site layout and design. The applicant is also at.this time not proposing to relocate the gas line easement which runs through the present site. With this new plat configuration, the developer would be able to construct the proposed development without relocating the gas line through the project. It appears that the developer has tried to incorporate all of the re- quirements that the City Council directed the developer to research at the December 15, 1982 Council Meeting. The reduction in density would put the preliminary plat right on the maximum number of units allowed in the project with the possibility that if the bedroom mix in the units would shift, it would be under the allowable density, however, providing the 3 -bedroom unit would make the project more marketable to all ranges of people. Therefore, the proposed project would contain one dwelling unit over the required density for this specific mix. The staff would like to point out that this density has been calculated deducting the 60' right-of-way of Shield's Lane. The parking for the .overall development is 10 spaces under the 2.5 parking spaces per unit requirement, but is in excess of the 2 parking spaces per unit. If the Council desires the applicant to add 10 addi- tional spaces, these should be added in as a requirement to the condi- tions. If the preliminary plat is approved, it should be subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1. A variance would have to be approved 0.9% over the lot coverage requirement, and the variance for one dwelling unit over the maxi- mum allowable within this oondominiun district, or revise the unit mix to provide one -bedroom vs. the three-bedroan units which then would core below the dwelling unit requirement for this particular site. 2. The plat should be subject to all easements as requured by City staff. 3. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be ap- proved by the City staff. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by the City staff, and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. SO 0 TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 13, 1982 RE: REVISION TO THE LANE OAK HEIGHTS PRELIMINARY PLAT At the December 15, 1981 City Council Meeting, the City Council continued the preliminary plat of Lone Oak Heights for 30 days for the developer to revise the plan in order that no variances for density or lot coverage would be needed for the preliminary plat. The Council also directed the developer to look at re -designing the plat to shift the road more into the center of the plat, or take direct access onto Pilot Knob Road. Staff has had contact with Bernard Larson of Dakota County Plat Commission and he had indicated that obtaining access onto Pilot Knob Road between Tower - view Road and Ione Oak Road would be difficult, and that this access would not be granted unless access could not be obtained to the parcel frau any other location. The revised plat has lowered the dwelling units from 139 to 121. The mix on the comm+in inn units would be 6 three-bedroom dwelling units, 30 two-bedroom dwelling units and 30 one -bedroom dwelling units. The square footage required for the style and type of dwelling unit would be 206,160 square feet. The net density on the site is 200,376 square ft. Therefore, the applicant is 5,784 square feet over the density allowed in the condominium area. If the applicant reduced the 3 -bedroom units, the applicant would gain approximately 8,700 square feet and would cane in compliance with Ordinance 52. The following is a breakdown of the revised preliminary plat. REVISED DENSITY CALCULATION WITH DEDUCTION OF THE 60' STREET Parcel Acres Lot Coverage Dwelling Units Dwg.Units Condominium 4.6 20.9% 0- M. Townhouse 7.5 20.0% 55 55 TOTAL 12.1 121 121 Note: In calculating the density for the condominium, the number of units vary in accordance with the number of stories and the number of bedrooms per unit. Therefore, the numbers allowed in this particular area can deviate and no one set number would be correct. Normally, in calculating density for an R-4 District, if you use a proximate of 14-15 units in a 3 -story building, you would range between 64 and 69 dwelling units. In reviewing the overall plat, all setback requirements are met for setbacks along public streets and rights-of-way. Also, all setbacks are net between dwelling units. In reviewing the lot coverage, the townhouse lot coverage is right at 208 for the R-3 portion of the develcprmsnt and the lot coverage for the condominium, or the R-4 portion of the development, is at 20.9%, which is just barely over the 20% lot coverage requirement. 41 Lone Oak Heiqhts Revision January 13, 1982 Page three 5. The developer shall provide a tot lot for the proposed pre-schoolers within this development. An adequate bond shall also be required for this tot lot. 6. The developer shall construct a trail from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School somewhere between the condominium and townhouse devel- opment. 7. The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowners' Association by-laws for City review. B. The development agreement and planned development agreement shall be approved prior to the final plat of Lone Oak Heights. 9. The plat shall be reviewed by Dakota County Plat Commission, because the plat abuts two County roads. DCR/jach ENGINEERING REC(3nMMUICES 10. An internal street connecting Towerviea Road and Ione Oak Road must be constructed to City standards for public residential streets. All private access drives serving more than 4 units must be a 24' minimum width. 11. The developer shall agree to pay all levied, deferred, pending and other assessments associated with benefit received from public utili- ties.'and/or streets adjacent to this proposed plat as determined by the Public Works Department as estimated in a mem dated October 8, 1981 and revised on January 14, 1982. TAC/jack .S 0 0 TO: ANN COERS, SPECIAL ASSES.91ENT CLERK FFal: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS rll-e— DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1981 (Revised 1-14-82) RE: PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSR92US AGAINST PARCEL NO. 10 00900 011 02 (Martin Shields) PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEICHTS An assessment research of the above -referenced parcel was performed to de- termine what outstanding assessments must be collected by the City of Eagan prior to development of this property. This memo is meant to be a research of all assessments that have been, or will be, the responsibility of this parcel. ASSESSMENTS PREVIOUSLY LEVIED 1. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Area Assessment - 1968 2. Sanitary Sewer Lateral Assessment (Lone Oak Road) - 1970 3. Water Lateral Assessment (Lone Oak Road) - 1970 PENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 1. Storm Sewer Trunk Area (Project 177), 596,772 -_ square feet at $.0375 per square foot $22,378.95 2. Water Trunk Area Assessment (Deferment from 1976), 13.7 acres at $770.00 per acre 10,549.00 3. Lateral Benefit from trunk watermain (Towerview Road), 575.7 feet at $14.35 per foot 8,261.30 4. Lone Oak Road street assessment (Project 200), 385 feet at $24 per foot (estimated residential equivalent) 9,240.00 S. Pilot Knob Road Street Assessment (Project 200), 1,084.3 feet (150' corner lot credit) at $24/ft. - (RER) Estimated Residential Equivalent 26,023.20 6. Sanitary Sewer Lateral (Project 347), public hearing - 10-20-81 (estimate)57999-99 TOTAL OUTSTANDINr PENDING ASSESSMEPUS FUTURE ASSESSABLE COSTS 1. Toaerview Road Street Improvement (Project )M), 575.7' at $25/ft. (estimate only) $14,392.50 SZ I 9,003.1( 85,455.5` M • • SUBJECT TO APPROVAL MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 22, 1981 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, September 22, 1981 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan City Hall. Present were Chairman Harrison and APC Members Krob, Bohne, Turnham, Gits, Hall and Wilkins. Also present were City Planner Runkle, Public Works Director Colbert, City Engineer Rosene and City Attorney Hauge. AGENDA Upon motion duly made and seconded the agenda as distributed was approved with the exception that the application of James C. Kilbourne for variance from front set -back requirements for home on Lot 2, Block 4, Drexel Heights Addition be continued to the next regular meeting; further, that the staff review with the Planning Commission the action by the Council concerning sign permits and Day Care Ordinance revision. All voted yes. Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Minutes of the meeting of August 25, 1981 were approved as distrsibuted. All voted yea. NORMAN VOGELPOHL VARIANCE - YANKEE SQUARE The public hearing regarding the application of Norman Vogelpohl for variance for 5 feet from the 20 foot parking set -back requirement along public street on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition, was first convened by Chairman Harrison. Norman Vogelpohl was present and explained the error that he had created in that the curbing in the parking area was installed with only a 15 foot set -back from the property line, or 20 feet from Washington Drive. The staff, including Tom Colbert explained that there have been a number of revisions that have been requested of Mr. Vogelpohl in the site plans for his restaurant in Yankee Square, most of which have been corrected. Mr. Vogelpohl stated that he had received letters from Mr. Colbert but had not reviewed them. It was noted the driving lane at the restaurant was at the variance point, and that rebuilding the parking lot to avoid the variance would require a good deal of construction. Mr. Colbert stated that there was no formal approval of the site plans, although Mr. Vogelpohl stated he had a signed formally approved site plan from the City Staff. It was further noted land- scaping plan is required and Planning Commission members stated they were concerned about deviations from the original plan and the oridinance require- ments. After consideration discussion, Krob moved, Harrision seconded the motion to continue the hearing until the next regular meeting so that the applicant can meet with the staff and attempt to resolve the issues that are not in compliance with the plan and ordinances, including landscaping and site plan. All voted in favor. LONE OAK HEIGHTS ADDITION PRELI MINART PLAT AND VARIANCE The public hearing regarding the application of Midwestern Association - Orrin Aune for preliminary plat approval of Lone Oak Heights, consisting of S4 APC Minutes September 22, 1981 14.09 acres and containing 145 dwelling units, together with an application for variance to exceed lot coverage in residential district was next convened. Mr. Aune was present as were other representatives for the applicant. Mr. Aune stated a private road is planned between Lone Oak Road and Towerview Road within the development, although the staff recommended that it be a public street according to city public street standards. Mr. Aune agreed with the street being built to city standards but requested that set back requirements be waived. It was noted further that the density permitted would be less if the street were upgraded to public. street standards and with required ordi- nance set backs. Mr. Aune stated that NSP would relocate the gas main through the property and thatthe applicant had agreed with the relocation at the developers' cost. It was further noted that Dakota County will not allow access from the development to Pilot Knob Road and that only Towerview and Lone Oak Road could be used for access. Mr. Aune showed a revised plan which changed the location of parking and there were concerns by staff as to the location of the garages in relation to parking. A large number of affected residents from the general area were present and objected to certain aspects of the development, including the impact on Pilot Knob School and the addi- tional traffic on Lone Oak Road. Mr. Aune stated there would be two home- owner's associations and staff was concerned about the private street owned and maintained by two different associations with potential problems. Mr. Aune further stated that the land is not feasible for underground parking because the condominium buildings are not large enough to be economically feasible for underground parking. There were also objections to the density proposed and the fact that the adjoining playground is already heavily used. Member Hall recommended that the Planning Commission consider recommending approval, subject to compliance with the ordinance requirements on density, and that the interior street be upgraded to city standards with allowing set- back deviations because of the existing planned development. Two tot lots are being proposed in the project. A representative from Banco Mortgage was present and stated that FHA may require the street to be dedicated to the City and further stated that under FHA requirements, that sales could not initially be made to non-resident owners. There was also a suggestion that a looped street be installed in the townhouse area. After considerable discussion, Hall moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subjecet to the following: 1. That the parking area on the revised plan be reviewed, including the parking near the condominium buildings and that the parking throughout the complex comply with ordinance requirements and staff recommendations. 2. That the total number of units comply with density requirements for the specific zoning on the entire parcel. 3• That in the event that the planned development is not completed within three years from the time of final approval by the council, with the potential for extension of time at the discretion of the City, that the property then revert to Agricultural zoning. 4. If the site plan is approved, the gas main shall be relocated so as not to interfere with any of the proposed buildings. 2 Sr APC Minutes September 22, 1981 5. The townhouses shall be relocated to meet the setback requirements in accordance with Ordinance 52. 6. The plat shall be subject to all easements as required by City staff. 7. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Staff. 8. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not re- leased until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 9. The developer shall provide two tot lots for the pre-schoolers within the development. 10. The developer shall construct a trail to city standards from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School between the condominium and townhouse develop- ment as determined by the City staff. 11. The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the homeowner's association Articles and By-laws for City review. 12. A development agreement and planned development agreement shall be approved prior to approval of the final plat of Lone Oak Heights. 13. The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts two county roads. 14. The developer shall provide the necessary drainage and utility easements throughout the addition for water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer lines as determined by staff. 15. The developer shall install a street, to city standards, from Lone Oak Road to Towerview, through the development that would allow for future dedication to the City as a standard public street in the event the mortgage lender requires dedication or the event the city determines it should be dedicated for proper maintenance; further that the street setback provisions not be required. It was also noted that a number of other variances would be required under the proposal including reducing the number of units in both the condomi- nium and townhouse areas, the set -backs along Pilot Knob Road and the total square footage for the mix that is proposed. All members voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no. It was suggested that the developers meet with the area residents informally, prior to consideration at the next council meeting, and Mr. Aune agreed with the proposal. RAVINE PLAZA - REZONING, PRELDUNARY PLAT AND VARIANCE The public hearing regarding the application of Amcon Corporation and Patrick Gannon to rezone approximately 19 acres from agricultural to PD 3 cS6 IA O'rEsi..... 5pGAiES VALLEY ENGINEERiNG CO, INC CA".... �• •JPO SUITE 204, '"MRS EDGE DFFIEE PLAZA .YI1 1.. I • PO BOY ATB PRIOR LANE, BOX 479 TELE PRONE 16Q)44 LONE OAK HEIGHT'S I' oYII ! JQ ' i I� I I II ,I I� ,1 it 11 II �I , 1(4( Iww•!Ow 1; ••-1 ;,;e:i{ LEGEND .--_. I � 1�IDbtfM , AYfVYIE 1 I II � I! I .. I a 4'1mlr� ud II. I . II. II 'I t, 'I �I WCWE5TERN" ASSOCIATES W P 4Lu1. M b,Sr • LONE VALLEY ENGINEERING CO, INC SUITE 2", WATERS EDGE OPPICE PLASH FO 60a 41 PRIOR LAKE, MNNE 5556 TEUE ONE (6¢1 .2570 J HEIGHT'S 7`' .� 2( I .I v.011 Ie u - j._a.,. LEGEND . — �. char ¢"ol -- •:�`r--ts7—=�_.'--.a- I E fiLMlla/ faIIOR's1 � � _ iii rriu •�.-, r a : r.+�'-�::T_ _ ;I 11 II _ I - I I I 1 I .. I I I ' ql.T w Seoe I1 l� /77�7 oil .. ... ..... ... .... .. M 7=7 l� /77�7 oil 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Ten AMCON CORPORATION FOR RAVINE PLAZA B. Amcon Corporation for Rezoning from A to PD to Allow Two Office Buildings and Hotel Complex; for the Preliminary Plat of Ravine Plaza & for a Variance to Exceed the Height Limitation in a Com- mercial District -- Due to the fact the height limitation study is not complete, this item will be continued until the February 23 1982 City Council meeting. The applicants have been notified that the subcommittee is working on the height limitations issue and will be making a recommendation to the Advisory Planning Com- mission at the 1-26-82 meeting and then their findings will be presented to the Eagan City Council at the February 2, 1982 meeting. If there is any delay by either the special subcommittee or Advisory Planning Commission, the item will again have to be continued for that purpose. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the item until the 2-2-82 City Council meeting. BURNET REALTY FOR PYLON BUSINESS SIGN C. Burnet Realty for a Conditional Use Permit for Pylon Business Sign located in the Cedarview Addition -- A public hearing was held before the APC at their regular meeting held on November 24, 1981 and continued until the December 22, 1981 meeting. Action was taken by the APC recommending approval of the pylon sign for Burnet Realty subject to no variances being granted or any addi- tional pylon signs being granted for the other two (2) office buildings. Enclosed on page (,1 is a copy of those APC minutes. At the last City Council meeting e d on January 5, 1982, the City Council expressed concern that the property owner be aware that, if a pylon sign is granted to Burnet Realty, there will be no addi- tional signs granted for the other two office buildings. The City Administrator was directed to write a letter to the property owner and request a response from the owner by the January 19 City Council meeting. For a copy of the City Administrator's letter and response from Mr. William Brandt, who is the owner of the property, refer to pages 6 -*a through _6 For information relating to the City Planner's report, refer o pages 6 through 10 of the 1-5-82 City Council packet. If any member of the City Council has mis- placed that information, please contact the Administrator's office and copies will be made available as a part of the administrative packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi- tional use permit for a pylon business sign for Burnet Realty as recommended for approval by the APC . M 0 *UBJECT TO APPROVAL MINUTES OF A REGULAR METING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION CEAGAN, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 22, 1981 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, December 22, 1981 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan City Hall. Present were Chairman Harrison and APC Members Wilkins, Turnham, Vogt, Bohne, and Krob. Also present were City Planner Runkle, Public Works Director Colbert, Assis- tant Planner Dave Osberg and City Attorney Hauge. MINUTES Upon motion duly made and seconded, it was resolved that the Minutes of the previous meeting be approved with the exception that on page 1 relating to the minutes of the previous meeting, that the words proctor density compaction should be proper density computation. BURNET REALTY The continued public hearing regarding the application of Burnet Realty for conditional use permit for pylon business sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Addition, 4655 Nicols Road, was then convened by Chairman Harrison. The matter had been continued from the November 24, 1981 regular meeting. Leonard MacKinnon, Manager of the local Burnet Realty office was present and there was discussion concerning the 300 foot spacing requirement. The owner, Mr. Brandt, is aware of the 300 foot spacing and commission members suggested joint use of the sign. After discussion, Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. The pylon sign may not be located within 300 feet of any other pylon sign measured on the same side of the street. 2. The pylon sign may not project more than 27 feet above ground level. 3. The pylon sign may not exceed 125 square feet of signage per side. 4. The pylon sign shall not be located nearer than 10 feet from any property or dividing line. 5. The sign shall be in conformance with all other applicableordin- ances. 6. Further, that a letter be sent to the owner with a copy of the applicable ordinance provision indicating that this would be the only permit for pylon sign in the subdivision because of the 300 foot spacing requirement. All voted in favor. 0 BEAAYOR IST MAYOR THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1110MAS F6AN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS January 6, 1982 CITY OF EAGAN 519S PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O. BOK 11199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55111 PHONE 454-8100 MR BILL BRANDT� 1$010 GLAZIER AVE P. APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Cl IV C114A Re: Pylon Sign Request for Burnet Realty at Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Addition, Mico sRoad Dear Mr. Brandt: In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on January 5, 1982, an application of Burnet Realty for a conditional use permit for a pylon business sign to be located on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Addition, 4655 Nicols Road, as recommended for approval by the Advisory Planning Commission, was continued until the January 19. 1982 regular City Council meeting. The City Council is not certain that a pylon sign advertising a real estate business is the best use of the only pylon sign that will be allowed for the three (3) office buildings on your property. The City Council is in- terested in knowing who the prospective tenants are or the anticipated occu- pancy for the two buildings that are unoccupied at this time. The City Council is concerned that, if this pylon sign is granted, a request will be made by a tenant of one of the additional office buildings for a pylon sign in the near future. Since the City Council has not deviated from its sign ordinance provisions of not allowing pylon signs to be located within 300 feet of other pylon signs on the same side of the street, you will not be allowed to have any additional pylon signs requested for the two additional office buildings at any time in the future if the pylon sign is granted to Burnet Realty. The Eagan City Council would like your response to this issue in writing prior to the January 19, 1982 City Council meeting so the application sub- mitted by Burnet Realty and the recommendation of the Advisory Planning Commission can be acted upon at that time. If you have any questions regarding the concerns expressed by the City Council, please feel free to contact this office at any time. Sincerely, !.1 Thomas L..41Hedges City Administrator 6 a THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. cc: Mr. Leonard MacKinnon, Burnet Realty; Dale Runkle, City Planner 0 0 Brandt Management Company 15010 GLAZIER AVENUE APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (612) 432-3200 William F. Brandt President January 12, 1982 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: In responding to the attached letter, let me first say it is a comforting feeling knowing that as property owners in the City of Eagan, we have a city council as responsive as you are to the future needs and concerns of building owners and tenants as displayed in the attached letter. The fact that you are looking out for the future needs of future tenants for proper signage is very commendable indeed. We as owners have agreed to allow Burnet Realty to locate a pylon sign on our property for it is our understanding that the future signage needs of our future tenants can be satisfied by placing a building sign on each of the two additional buildings without violating the sign ordinances provision of not allowing pylon signs to be located within 300 feet of one another. We anticipate placing these building signs on the west side of each building (or the freeway side) to give us future exposure. Would you please notify me at once if our assumptions are incorrect. At this time we do not know who the prospective tenants are or what the anticipated occupancy is for the two buildings. Future building signs should suffice these needs, however. Should you, have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Kindes rega�s,;2 -� �,/ (JAN William F. Brandt 141rC2 /rclnEnclosure 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Eleven GRAVEL PIT LICENSE ANNUAL RENEWAL D. Gravel Pit License Annual Renewal for Arnold Leitner -- Informa- tion regarding this item has been partially accumulated, and due to the absence of Chief Building Inspector Peterson who is attending state building officials schooling late this week, this information will be provided with the administrative memo on Monday, January 18, 1982. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the annual gravel pit license renewal for Arnold Leitner. There are ten (10) items of organizational business that must be considered by the City Council. Those items are listed as A. through J., and for additional information on these items, please refer to pagesS through �Z It will be necessary for the City Council to tame separate action on each of the ten separate items. Ballots will be available for voting on Item E., that being appointments for the APC and Advisory Park & Recreation Committees. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: for each organizational business item. BE Separate action is necessary 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 15, 1982 SUBJECT: ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS A meeting held in the first month of each calendar year is consi- dered an organizational meeting for the purpose of: ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS A'. Acting Mayor B. Legal Newspaper C. City Depositories D. Official Posting Places E. Advisory Planning Commission and Advisory Park & Recreation Committee Appointments F. Health Officers G. City Council Meetings H. Committee Appointments I. Fiscal Consultants J. Legal Consultant A. Acting Mayor It is a statutory requirement to appoint an Acting Mayor who presides in theabsence of the Mayor. All Councilmembers are eligible for election by the City Council. In 1981, City Council - member Smith was the Acting Mayor and would preside in the absence of Mayor Blomquist. The Acting Mayor presides in the absence of the Mayor at City Council meetings and all other activities per- taining to the City of Eagan. B. Legal Newspaper It is also a statutory requirement f. -)r the City to designate a newspaper as the official legal newspaper for the City. The statutes specifically state that a City can only designate a legal newspaper of general circulation in the City as its official news- paper. There is published in this newspaper during the year each ordinance and other matters as are required by law to be so pub- lished and such other matters as the Council may deem it advisable and in the public interest to have published in this manner. Some of the items that must be published or are optional include: a) Ordinances; b) Annual Financial Statements; c) Council Proceedings; d) Notices of Elections; and e) Resolutions. It is important to follow a thorough pattern in utilizing a legal publication for the following reason. The law requires an official matter to be published in the official newspaper publication; for example, if an ordinance is not published in the official newspaper, it is more than likely not valid. The Dakota County Tribune and Current Newspapers have both requested a designation to be the City's legal newspaper. Attached as pages i1 through '7%_ are copies of the proposals. 6S Organizational Business Memo January 15, 1982 Page Two C. City Depositories It is a statutory requirement also that depositories be designated for all City funds. The term "depository" refers to a place or places in which a City keeps its money. Any national bank, state bank, private bank or trust company permitted to do banking business and any federal savings and loan association may be designated as a depository for City funds. More than one bank or savings and loan may be designated as a depository for City funds and, except as limited by the Council resolution, provide security which the institution is able to furnish. There is not a limit on the amount which may be deposited in one institution. The City of Eagan in the past years has taken a two part action that 1) The City of Eagan has named Mid-America Bank as the general depository for purpose of holding a checking account to pay bills throughout the year, and 2) Several depositories have been desig- nated for the purpose of investing idle funds. Enclosed on page is a letter from the First Bank requesting consideration to maintain either the payroll or checking accounts; both are cur- rently serviced by Mid-America Bank. Also enclosed, on page 10 is a copy of a memo from the City Clerk -Treasurer listing tt a 3epositories for investment of funds and comments about the sharing of the daily accounts. D. Posting Place Historically, the City designated four official posting places which included the Eagan City Hall, the Lone Oak Tree at Hwy. 49 and Lone Oak Road, Cedarvale Shopping Center and Yankee Drug. The Lone Oak Tree is now designated for historical purposes; infor- mation is not posted at that location. Special meeting notices have been posted on a regular basis at the Eagan City Hall. Due to the Eagan Chronicle, Dakota County Tribune and City wide news- letter, posting at City Hall is sufficient. 0 Organizational Business Memo January 15, 1982 Page Three E. Advisory Planning Commission and Advisory Park & Recreation Committee Appointments The following Advisory Planning Commission appointments are up for consideration: 3 Year One Year Alternate (1982-83) (1982) (1982) Thomas Gits X Lloyd Krob X Joe Harrison X Dale Vogt X It will be necessary to make two (2) appointments to three (3) year terms, one (1) appointment to a one (1) year term (vacant because of resignation of Joe Harrison) and one (1) appointment to the one (1) year alternate position. Thomas Gits, Lloyd Krob and Dalr Vogt have all expressed interest in being reappointed to the commission. In addition, the following residents expressed interest and were interviewed by the City Council: Robin A. Broms, Steve A. Darling, Floyd J. Forsberg, Wally Hafstad, Thomas E. Mann, Pamela A. McCrea, Garrett E. Mulrooney, Dale C. Nathan, Kenneth A, Pirkl, Frances Winkel and Michael W. Wold. Curt England and Joan S. Maddux expressed interest in either the Planning Commission or Park Committee. The following Advisory Park Committee appointments are up for con- sideration: 3 Year (1982-83) Richard Carroll X Donn Schumacher X Michael Thomas X It will be necessary to make three (3) appointments year terms. Richard Carroll and Donn Schumacher interest in being reappointed to the committee. expressed interest and who were interviewed by th Tom Gustafson and, also, Curt England and Joan M interested in either committee as stated above. for three (3) have expressed Residents who e Council are Ma 67 who were Organizational Business Memo January 15, 1982 Page Four F. Health Officers In past years, the City has appointed a Health Officer, which is presently Cedarvale Medical Clinic. If there was an epidemic, or, for example, there are unsanitary conditions which exist in housing or restaurants or some other areas of the City, the Health Officer could be called upon to write a letter and ask that the area be cleaned up. The City would also work with the County Health Board and Minnesota Department of Health and Welfare. G. City Council Meetings Each year, the City Council must designate days and times speci- fically for City Council meetings. In years past, the City has met on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. which is designated as official City Council meetings. It is recommended that the same date and time be continued so it is not confusing to the general public as to what days and times the official City Council meetings are held at City Hall. H. Committee.Appointments Several committee appointments can be made by Mayor Blomquist at the organizational meeting. The list of standing committees is as follows: 1. Personnel Committee; 2. Finance Committee; 3. Community Development and Public Relations Committee; Public Works Committee. 1. The.Personnel Committee was created in 1977 for the purpose Of writing a ersonne o icy and also to create a foundation for personnel procedures. More recently, the Personnel Commit- tee completed a _job classification document for all employee positions. The Personnel Committee does not meet on a regular basis, however, is available if the City Council should ask for a special review or study regarding salary compensation plans, personnel related matters such as personnel records, affirmative action, union contracts or other related matters. The two City Council members who served on the Personnel Com- mittee in 1981 were Tom Egan and Ted Wachter, with Mr. Egan as chairman. 2. The Finance Committee was established to investigate from time to time t e practicality of issuing new bonds for the City, whether it be for equipment certificates, general obli- gation or industrial revenue. The Finance Committee has re- searched many special programs such'as the tax exempt mortgage financing and other industrial revenue tax exempt mortgage type financing programs. The Finance Committee will review any application if a special study is requested by the City E Organizational Business Memo January 15, 1982 Page Five Council. The Finance Committee also meets and reviews all other special projects as directed by the City Council that involve budgetary expenditures. The two members of the City Council who served on the Finance Committee in 1981 were Jim Smith and Mark Parranto, with Mr. Parranto acting as chairman. 3. The Community Development and Public Relations Committee is th-e--THIra committee. This committee has been comprise of two Council members and the Mayor. It functions as an advisory committee to the City Council for purposes of adver- tising and attracting new commercial, industrial and resi- dential development to the community. This committee has not functioned actively in that capacity, however, was respon- sible for publishing community newsletters in 1978, 79 and 80. In response to the request for an economic development committee, it might be feasible during 1981 that this commit- tee investigate alternatives and a procedure for creating an advisory committee or some other channel to emphasize various aspects of commercial, industrial and residential growth. This committee must also investigate whether there should be continuance of the City wide newsletter. This com- mittee was also organized in 1977 and its members during 1981 were Mayor Blomquist and Tom Egan, with Mayor Blomquist serving as the chairperson. 4. The Public Works Committee is a fourth committee and in- cludes utilities, roads, par s and even issues that relate to the airport commission. This committee has studied the recommendations from the City Administrator and also the Director of Public Works concerning the construction of wells, reservoirs, and new utility mains. It also relates to various street improvements, maintenance and new construction as well as snow removal and other related items. This committee does not meet on a regular basis, however is available to study certain issues of the Public Works operation as designated by the City Council. This committee was also formed in 1977 and had two members, Mark Parranto and Mayor Blomquist, with Mr. Parranto serving as chairman, in 1981. • a1111Mo The City Council, in setting up the four (4) standing committees, attempted to limit the number of standing committees to four workable committees which all contain somewhat a broad range of topics. The purpose of the standing committees is to conduct investigations, to make reports on matters of facts. Often, the committees are used to study facts and make recommenda- tions. The City Administrator works very closely with all four (4) committees and normally supplies information and other data to the committees' chairperson and members when committee meetings are held. All meetings are open to the public. The meeting notices 69 0 0 Organizational Business Memo January 15, 1982 Page Six are prepared for all meetings, stating the location of the meetings and items for discussion. The committees are advisory to the City Council. There is no action taken, and, therefore, formal minutes are not required; however, a report is generally prepared by the City Administrator or a committee member which is presented to the City Council for any action that is required at a regular meeting. Fiscal.Consultant Each year, a fiscal consultant is appointed by the City Council to provide fiscal advice and handle bond sales for the City of Eagan. Miller & Schroeder is currently acting as the City's fiscal agent. Since there is no written agreement with Miller & Schroeder, technically, they are hired per bond issue on a continuing basis per discretion of the City Council. J. Legal.Consultant The law firm of Paul Hauge & Associates is providing the City with an excellent service and it is again recommended that Paul Hauge be appointed as City Attorney for the City of Eagan. Enclosed on page���� is a letter I requested from Mr. Hauge that outlines his proposedfee schedule. Mr. Hauge, in the same letter, is requesting appointment as the prosecuting attorney. The City has received a proposal from the firm of Ramstad, Theisen & Kennedy to serve as prosecutor for the city. If the City Council is in- terested in receiving a quotation from that firm and an interview action to appoint the prosecutor could be deferred until the 2- 2-82 meeting. The letter is enclosed on page _4g-2- for your review. 70 • • AREA 612.463.7664 DAKOTA aKOT ® 1 0 D C® Y TRIBUNE 1 MAIN OFFICE - FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55024 BRANCH OFFICES ROSEMOUNT LAKEVILLE BURNSVILLE APPLE VALLEY December 15, 1981 City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Mayor Bea Blomquist: Councilman Thomas Egan: Councilman James Smith: Councilman Jerry Thomas: Councilman Theodore Wachter: We would like to be considered for the appointment as the city's legal newspaper at your organizational meeting Tuesday, January 5, 1982. The Dakota County Tribune has served as the legal newspaper for the City of Eagan for many years. Residents, as well as bidders, are very familiar with the Tribune's legal section. Similarly, because we have been a legal newspaper for many years, our staff is experienced in handling legal notices which, in many instances, require the type of knowledge only experience provides. Recently, the Tribune has made two exciting changes to improve its service to the city. First, we have opened our new Burnsville -Eagan office in an effort to serve residents of Eagan more efficiently. In addition, we have added another reporter to expand our news as well as feature coverage in Eagan. Attached are the certified rates for legals published in the Dakota County Tribune: If you have any questions, please feel free to phone us at 463-7884. A representative from our paper will be pre at the meeting to answer any questions. Sincer Daniel H. Clay Publisher P R I N T E R S A N D P U B L I S H E R S S I N C E 1 8 8 4 �fAFE OF MINNESOTA �J: 4180 �t_ DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF PRINTING CERTIFICATION OF NEWSPAPER LEGAL NOTICE LINE RATE Name of Newspaper Address ,; d 5 sr, Lower Case Alphabet (in points) / 0 akdefg,Ijklmmpgntuvwxyz 1y' Column width (in picas) Z/ L Name of Type Face This certification, based on information furnished by. the publisher of the newspaper named above, shows below the approved maximum rates allowed for legal notices only for ve named newspaper — set in type face described above. /1, First Insertion: :�77 O cents per line. p Subsequent Insertions: / �> • 0 cents per line. *Extra Composition: 210 cents per line. *To be added to first insertion ONLY. 2 State Printer Jr / Date STATE OF MINNESOTA 4181 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF PRINTING CERTIFICATION OF NEWSPAP� LEGAL NOTICE LINE RATE Name of Newspaper __ JCo Address Lower Case Alphabet (in points) 1?0 p Column width (in picas) ��i� SO Name of Type Face This certification, based on information furnished by the publisher of the s aper named above, shows below the approved maximum rates allowed for legal notices only for thea ova ed n spaper — set in type face described above. First Insertion: S2E=2, cents per line. Subsequent Insertions: ��pp7, O cents per line. L *Extra Composition: � a cents per line. *To be added to first insertion ONLY. State Printer Date CWS=PAPWERS 1209E.CLIFFRD. • BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337•TELEPHONE 890-4456 January 6, 1982 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN. Dear Mr. Hedges:. dqN 8 1v�2 I wish to advise you of our request to be considered for designation of The Eagan Chronicle as the City's legal newspaper during the next fiscal year. We have long anticipated changes in state law which would make it possible for The Chronicle to qualify as a legal newspaper, and these changes were enacted during the last session of the Legislature. As a result, we filed necessary documents with the Secretary of State last September, and the Chronicle now qualifies as.a legal newspaper in every respect. 'j(f�oti You may be aware that we were designated as District 191's legal newspaper last summer. We hope that will ansa be designated by the City Council of Eagan when that item comes up on the agenda. I am enclosing a copy of our audited circulation statement, prepared by Certified Audit of Circulations. A more recent audit report has been drafted, but not yet printed. I am also enclosing a copy of that proof for your information. At least one other newspaper serving Eagan also has circulation audited by CAC, so the Council may wish to obtain a copy of their audit report in order to verify circulation comparisons. The deadline for receiving legal copy for The Eagan Chronicle is 4:30 P.M. Fridays, in our office. In the event of holidays, a special deadline schedule will be in effect. Rates for publication of legal notices are set, under statute, by the State Printer of Minnesota. Based on our type size and column width, the following rates are charged by Current Newspapers, Inc. for legal notices: -73 THE BURNSVILLE CURRENT• COUNTRYSIDE• EAGAN CHRONICLE 1209 E. CLIFF RD. • BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337•TELEPHONE 890-4456 Page 2 Hedges January 6, 1982 $.22B per line --first insertion .152 per line --each subsequent insertion .076 per line --extra composition (chargeable for first insertion only) The Eagan Chronicle is delivered by private carrier each Monday of the year to every household and business in the city of Eagan. In addition, we mail subscription copies out of the city to individuals who pay a subscription fee of $12 per year. If you have questions or require additional documentation, please let me know. We will have a representative at the Council meeting when legal newspaper designation is made, should questions arise that night. Sincerely, Mary C�Zi gen !y Publisher MKZ/ash enclosure 71 THE BURNSVILLE CURRENT COUNTRYSIDE* EAGAN CHRONICLE Audit report [Community Newspaper] For 6 month period ending MARCH 31, 1981 EAGAN CHRONICLE - 1980 M Name and year established Current Newspapers, Inc. I J Publishing company E Publishing and circulation policy `SP1, ,Ea n4D,e0O CQC✓LgT1aM5, Mark of Integrity Certified Audit of Circulations, Inc. Fairfield, N.J. 07006 a 201/227-7950 Burnsville, Dakota County, Minnesota 55337 WEEKLY - Tuesday Policy is to publish three weekly locally edited community news- papers printed in photo offset and in tabloid size. Advertising is sold separately or in combination. Each paper consists of 40% local news content. Circulation policy is to mail and carrier deliver single copies without charge to every home, apartment building, and business in the defined circulation area. Carrier delivery is completed Tuesday. © Total average audited circulation 6966 [D Audited paid circulation I Mail subscriptions .....,_........:...... . ...... _ .. El Carrier subscriptions ............................................... ... ONet retail sales ............................... stare, newsstand, rack and counter - - - Total average audited paid_, - ❑g Total average audited voluntary/optional paid - © Audited non -paid circulation ❑i Mail .,.... _..- single copies ...... 1111 Carrier ..... ....... ............. ............. .....single copies .._...... ... _,,—. 17 Carrier bulk ..... ............................ 5 or more copies . ....... ....... 531 6303 132 Total average audited non -paid 6966 ❑o Total average audited circulation ..... total of items A, a and c ..... 6966 El Total average all other audited copies service, files, returns, unsold, bulk 610 [E Total average audited distribution .. total of items o and E 7576 O Total overall audited circulation for nrevious nerinds (INITIAL AUDIT REPORT) %S CC) ::E C Z mn <, r Z {n 0 �aZ 0Xn r C) m c 3 D' M 0 0 O Audit statement ... We have exa&d the records of subject publication for the period covered by Audit Report. Our exam. ination of circulation records and related data was made in accordance with the Corporation's bylaws, rules and auditing standards and included such tests of accounting records and other ❑B Explanatory/additional data auditing proceds were considered necessary in the circum. o c stances. Based h examination, the statements set forth in this report present fairly the circulation position of the publication as verified by the Corporation auditors. Certified Audit of Circulations, Inc. Carrier delivery is subject to independent verification by C*A*C. 9. Publisher's geographical analysis of total audited circulation and total distribution for single issue of WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25, 1981. Carrier Single Copies 6865 TOTAL AUDITED CIRCULATION 6865 All Other Audited Copies Bulk to Stores 350 Other 285. 635 Total Audited Distribution 7500 10. Map of defined primary market 5:81-57 76 Audit rep®rf [Community Newspaper] For 6 month period ending EAGAN CHRONICLE - 1980 Name and year Current Newspapers, Inc. I F21. Publishing company -O Publishing and circulation policy o.1p„ m P p Mork of InteWitr Certified Audit of Circulations, Inc. 309 1981 Fairfield, N.J. 07006 s, 201 /227-7950 Itd9 6 -p=fd"` f -dr - Burnsville, Dakota County, Minnesota 55337 [D Address - WEEKLY - Zmeadw Policy is to publish three weekly locally edited community news- papers printed in photo offset and_ in tabloid size. Each paper consists of 40% local news content. Advertising Is sold separately or in combination. ,Refer to separate reports. Circulation policy is to mail and carrier deliver single copies without charge to every home, apartment buildinbusiness in the TS Publisher's defined area of circulation. er d;liv y is completed Tuesday. O0 p Total average audited circulation T 7646 © Audited paid circulation Q ED Mail subscriptions ............... .......... _............ .... :......... _..... - - 17 Carrier subscriptions........................................................ - MNet retail sales ................................ star.,. ,tend, r.ak and counter Total average audited paid - [11 Total average audited voluntary/optionalpaid - © Audited non -paid circulation pMail ........................... ................... i.gf...Pi..... ............... 35 7 225 ❑7 Carrier .....:..... ............ .................... singl. copies.,...... 386 U] Carrier bulk ................................ s.r mere copies .... ... ....... Total average audited non -paid 7646 O Total average audited circulation..... total of items A.0and c - . 7646 EM Total average all other audited copies ...i<., fil.,, aturns. unsaid, bulk 211 O Total average audited distribution t.t.l of items a and E 7857 ❑r Total average audited circulation for previous perloas 6 months ending %7 3-31-81 . . . . 6966 idif statement ... We have exams d the records of subject auditing procedur as were considered necessary in the circum. publication for the period covered by t#udit Report. Our exam- stances. Basad �ch examination, the statements set forth in Ination of circulation records and re ed data was made in this report presen Arty the circulation position of the publication accordance with the Corporation's bylaws, rules and auditing as verified by the Corporation auditors. standards and included such tests of accounting records and other Certified Audit of Circulations, Inc. 91 Explanatory/additional data Carrier delivery was independently verified by C*A*C between the dates of October 9 and 13, 1981 thru personal interviews conducted on a random selection of households within the Publisher's defined area of circulation. Findings indicated that 91.0% of households regularly received publication. 9. Publisher's geographical analysis of total audited circulation and total distribution for single issue of TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1981. Town E-ogan j j iii Total Carrier Single Copies Carrier Bulk Copies Mail Copies TOTAL AUDITED CIRCULATION All Other Audited Copies Total Audited Distribution 10. Map of defined primary market Zip Single Code Si le Copies 425 40Q� 35 Q Q=�� 135 .. Q 8025 1181-57_— 411First Ban* • 0 Eagan Office rJAA First Minnehaha Naticnal Bank3629 Krestwood LaneP.O. Box 21245 Sc Eagan. Minnesota 55121 612 452-6640 January 7, 1982 Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: On August 12, 1980, First Bank Minnehaha - Eagan Office, first opened its doors to service the financial needs of the Eagan community. In September of this past year, we renamed the bank "First Bank -Eagan Office, First Bank Minnehaha" to better identify with the community we serve. This past Year this office was authorized to act as a depository for city funds, and we would like to request that we be considered as a candidate for maintaining some of those funds. Due to our financial strength and expertise, we feel that our products and service are competitive and in tune with today's market. As you probably know, our bank is affiliated with the First Bank System, a multi -bank holding company based here in the Twin Cities area. Being part of that system allows us additional strength in offering up-to-date and useful products ranging from payroll systems to electronic funds transfer. Thank you for your time, Tom, and should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 452-6640. Sincerel , uss 11 E. Kruse, Jr. Assistant Vice President and Manager Eagan Office %/ Member First Bank System 0 MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR VAN OVERBEKE DATE: JANUARY 13, 1982 SUBJECT: 1982 DEPOSITORIES 0 Please have the following banks, .savings and loan associations and financial institutions designated as depositories for the City of Eagan for 1982: 1. Mid-America National Bank of Eagan 2. First Bank Minnehaha.. 3. First National Bank of St. Paul 4. First National Bank of Minneapolis 5. Northwestern National Bank of St. Paul 6. Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis 7. American National Bank & Trust Company 8. Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Assn. 9. Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Assn. 10. Northern Federal Savings & Loan Assn. 11. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Assn. 12. United Federal Savings and Loan Assn. 13. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn'. 14. Washington Federal Savings:. & Loan Assn. 15. Merrill, Lynch, Fenner & Smith, Ltd. 16. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. It would be my suggestion that we designate Mid-America National Bank of Eagan and First Bank Minnehaha as depositories for the City of Eagan general and payroll checking account funds with the understanding that a study will be made to facilitate a recom- mendation to and decision by the City Council as to which of the banks will actually be used and for which accounts. At this point, I am absolutely opposed to any arrangement more involved than simply giving one checking account to each bank' and to any kind of rotation policy. A one time switch of a single account would cause only the loss of some blank check inventory and some small changes in our operating procedures. s/E. J. VanOverbeke City (;l_erk7T1nance Director C� 0 0 PAUL H. HAUGE & ASSOCIATES. P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA 83122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator CITY OF EAGAN 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 January 14, 1982 RE: 1982 City Attorney Fees Dear Tom: AREA CODE B 12 TELEPHONE 4944224 You asked for a proposal for a 1982 fee schedule from our office for Eagan City Attorney purposes. I would request the following for 1982: General legal work for the City - $40.00 per hour (This rate has not been changed since at least 1977); Legal fees for improvement projects, including street and utility work based upon VC1 of contracts plus change orders awarded; Prosecution services - $35.00 per hour (The fee has been $1400 per month since about 1977 with an average of about 55 to 60 hours per month in 1981 or about $23 to $27 per hour. It is expected the amount of time will increase slightly to at least 60 hours per month on the average, but varies somewhat.). We have enjoyed the association with the City Council, the staff and committee:members, and would propose continuing the relationship for the coming year. 1---1 PHH:me M, ly yours, Paul H. Hauge RAMSTAD, THEISEN & KENNEDY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3918 BEAU -D -RUE DRIVE OEDARVALE HIGHLANDS EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 ROGER J. RAMSTAD December 11 1981 JOEL A. THEISEN JEFFREY W. KENNEDY Mayor B. Bomquist and The City Council - City of Eagan Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota RE: Prosecution for City of Eagan Dear Madame Mayor and Council Members: TELEPHONE 16121452-4252 It is my understanding that bids for the position of prosecutor for the City of Eagan will be under consideration in the very near future. It is, therefore, the purpose of this writing, to state an interest for our,law firm to be considered for that position. We have been in practice in the City of Eagan since December 1, 1975, and since that date have been engaged in the general practice of law. My back- ground includes law clerking with the City of Minneapolis, City Attorney's Office, Criminal Division, and I have been involved in much misdemeanor practice while working here in Eagan. One of my partners, Roger Ramstad, has also been actively involved in criminal practice, and has a great deal of experience in juvenile law, and misdemeanor work. Mr. Kennedy also has had a good deal of experience in the misdemeanor area, and I believe that our office could competently represent the City of Eagan in the position of prosecutors. We could all actively participate, and therefore, have very little conflicts as concerns scheduling, and the time which such a position would require. We would request an opportunity to be considered, and are available upon your request for further information and consultation as concerns this position. I appreciate in advance your consideration. Yours very truly, RAMSTAD, IEISEN $ KENNEDY el A. Theisen JAT:bh <i�'`� 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Twelve PRELIMINARY PLAT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR KINDER CARE A. Richard Nordlund for a Preliminary Plat for a Day Care Center and for a Conditional Use Permit for a Day Care Center/Pilot Knob Heights First Addition -- A public hearing was held at the Advisory Planning Commission meeting on November 24, 1981 to consider a preliminary plat and conditional use permit for a day care center referenced as Kinder Care. This item was continued by the APC to the December 22, 1981 meeting when action was taken by the Ad- visory Planning Commission to recommend denial of the Kinder Care applications for preliminary plat and conditional use permit to the City Council. For a copy of the City Planner's report, refer to pages 8 4�. through. For a copy of additional information prepared by the Planning ssistant, refer to pages q 2 through p c At the APC meeting on December 22, 1981, a number of ques- ti ns and concerns were raised about the ownership of the property in addition to the use of the land. To clarify the ownership issue, a letter was sent from the Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service to the City Administrator, a copy of which is enclosed on pages through 97 Planning Assistant Osberg prepared a follow- up memorandum Cat letter and the action taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, a copy of which is found on page 91 . For a copy of the minutes of that APC meeting, refer to page 99 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the action taken by the APC to deny the Kinder Care applications. 93 SUBJECT APPLICANT LOCATION EXISTING ZONING E CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DAY CARE CENTER - KINDER CARE RICHARD NORDLUND N;^A4 OF TIT . SW a OF . SECTION 15, PnOr KNOB HEIGHTS LST ADDITION LIMITED BUSINESS UNDER A PLANNED DEVELOWENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 24, 1981 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1981 REPORTED BY: DAVE OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED: The first application submitted is for preliminary plat approval for a day care cen- ter in a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition. The total area of the lot is 22,860 square feet. The second application submitted is for a conditional use permit to allow a day care center in a limited business district. RArKrWYNIS As you may recall from the September 29, 1981 Planned Development review, Lot 1, Block 1 of Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition had yet to be developed with the office complex that was originally approved under the Planned Developnent Agreement. Since that tine, the section of land where the day care center would be constructed has been donated to a charity by the previous owner, Ken Applebaum. Because of tight economic conditions, there have been no further plans for the office complex which would be adjacent to the proposed day care center. Under Section 52.07, Subdivision 7 of the Eagan zoning Ordinance, day care centers may be constructed in a limited business district as a conditional use permit. A 4,900 square foot building is being proposed on the lot, which is 22,860 square feet. At the present time, the preliminary plat shags that the maximum building coverage requirement for a limited business district is not being met. With a 4,900 square foot building being proposed, the required lot size is 24,500 square feet. The pro- posed preliminary plat is not meeting the lot coverage requirement. However, ne- gotiations are under way to acquire the conditional 1,640 square feet necessary to meet the lot coverage requirement. Several of these same day care enter facilities have been constructed in various communities in the 'Rain Cities. Staff contacted several of these com=ities to determine if there have been any problems or objections to these day care facili- ties. One item that was mentioned is that there have been some objections to the red roof on the facility. Another item discussed was the parking requirements for the facilities. Each connunity felt there was adequate parking for the facility. [iii 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - KINDER CARE ADDITION NOVEMBER 24, 1981 PAGE TWO Mile the preliminary plat shows ten parking spaces, there are no specific parking requirements for day care centers as that issue is determined by the Council. The day care center has the capacity to handle 99 children. Experience in other corrmumities shows that the enrollments are usually far from the maximum. Other than the lot size requirement not being met at the present time, staff has re- viewed the preliminary plat and sees no further problems. If approved, the preliminary plat and conditional use permit should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Acquisition of the additional 1,640 square feet necessary to meet the lot coverage requirement must take place before the final plat is approved, with the change included in the final plat. 2. Necessary parking requirements must be determined before final plat approval. 3. A landscaping plan must be submitted with the final plat along with a $2,000 bond to assure completion of the landscape. 4. All day care center staff must meet County and State license requirements. 5. The hours of operation shall be from 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M., Mondav-Friday. DO/jach M I I — � Ij � Lorl I block =-TEXT U I on I P'L_DT K1106 'AsiglTs FIS 4ocl"� j �a N I w I a p,�?-JED�� i "NORTH m ' 86 Ott 3 10x5 1.1-11- �P1�IM -1 EPLIVI CONSTRUCTION 7 0. INC. 110 WEST Cou - 8060 C INT PALL. NINN650 T6 5511] 16111 616-6150 1 DATE 4/8/81 J �qGq� —PCFsl I CHR+ fH?ALSIC4 0 I I I I Ram aLi 11 Al&'L LL'( �1iF roil ;F ELr�� I -.^. j '-!ZG •-� i Til-�1ry i --. _ ::.: �IN�� • CARE CRI -q Zl rAC LALM y. IG6�wra� LwEF �-• .�.�...-urs...= - - - �.._�.-.�_...-..:� i �1M �MINGIt� � Sn��N I .. Je° cox p�rwav� _.� ' PawFh Poor VEi.11lL^rtm ! - A / .fyl�-�evE L+I 122 AenY.l� 1I �" 7 Sa'F� r S�si81 i t r r� 9 11 r 31 Ff- \rte-dx cin slue c..•rwoi 7, fl LA i -JeAw PH ED 11 I F ]IL9, 91 P-1 EIP ALVMIN 'A./.k4I} - Jr 11 r 31 Ff- \rte-dx cin slue c..•rwoi 7, fl LA i -JeAw PH ED 11 I F ]IL9, 91 P-1 EIP ALVMIN 'A./.k4I} - I MENDWA iA v - it RB I. llfllfl ` v � .J GB • ---- L�,. GOLF COMMS ._i� '.� h. d -:/ 1 �.w '� r,✓ PLANNED DE R Ind PE RII RIII '•Ind _ HlGB 7- 1 RE vA �,.—_ Ind •�/ �� >/ © C, t �i !f In ' •, •rte - // / LEO Rdll q : .. R-111 R -III R-11 I,, RII _ _R d. P -` ,.i._I -R-II— e RII L . R- IQi j' C V�. LB RIII' R I , -���• / ��li/ fY. -. �,w'.I R -II - —P %�.,. RIII .�. R E .r) - ..R.II `RI �p.(�j __R -II _ .+ R 9� - / HALL R-111II _. . _ r, .• ' . 1 P CRY R -I RII p_ R-1 +.7•; ,-.�;�, ,rlERh�. '' -•-R-11 Q �� � ��� P,� R-11 •.^P•� i II �'• R -II R -II i �LB 4 I M ...—• �_ nn E P � - . -olll +� R^:II -' N LRt�7� �� . j - ,' RBy- �! tl�j ` R -III R -III CSC/GB/LB R I R -III R- R -I. R -III �' ! RI. �_.-��_ R -II P ,y.i�L-CJ, z, E 'I� ! D CSC P R -II -' I .a: •,r. o ..,. ; ;�� R -II RII P� •• � �-. R -II P NB R r .. LB R -III LE3sc DLB ,. RB LB -_� r�R I P ; ; I iI,R_1 �j R I pR-1 '.;10 couX rr .r P R -I R -II QP RII GOLF w0 I%I RA _ �- v R -II • R -II q !c7 c,. �._➢ P �, .ter-•_�-> r;'z; �• ;--�� .,,! _ cis -! APPLE .ALLEY r` D I 1'�Rt SEMOUNeP %/ i B R-4 csc L CAR ry R T114 -3 cou WOOD LB RAILS R-4 N sf R 4 2, R-4 s Q _ l 1 A woo P -*z -R-1 R-1 CITY AL PF"' Rl I R -i ES OTT; R A K PF WtN D GZT. K A D 2 R i PD 'NiYall74-1 A ci cn PF 0 Z p 0 -R-3 p NB R A A 0 PI -R.TIPI 0 0 TO: CHAIRPERSON JOE HARRISON AND ADVISORY PLANNING CCtM'IISSION mRMERS FROM: DAVE OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT DATE: DEMMER 7, 1981 RE: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR KINDER CARE PROPOSAL IN PILOT KNOB HEIGHTS At the request of the Advisory Planning Commission, I have researched the activities which have taken place since the original Pilot.Knob Heights Planned Development was approved on December 12, 1974. This information is important in that the Commission members can now have a better understand- ing of the status of land in which Nr. Nordlund is proposing a Kinder Care Center. On December 11, 1979, the Advisory Planning Canmission gave preliminary plat approval to use this land in accordance with the original planned development proposal for an office complex. There were several questions raised at the meeting concerning the ponding area in the lot. It was pointed out that this pond would act as a sedimentation trap and as an emergency outlet into the storm sewer system. It was also stated that drainage would be further fil- tered before any excess water overflows into the storm sewer system. A ques- tion was raised by a resident as to the capabilities of Blackhawk lake hand- ling an excess storm drainage. Public Wbrks Director Colbert acknowledged that the proposed development would add to the problem and that the City is studying the problem. There was also a concern over the capacity of Fish Lake for additional storm drainage. Since this meeting, Public Works Director Colbert had prepared a report on the drainage capacity of Fish and Blackhawk lakes dated February, 1980. Copies of the report were distributed to the Plan- ning Commission and City Council explaining the projects being constructed to handle the proposed runoff. On January 5, 1980, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for the Pilot Knob Office Park. On March 26, 1981, staff received a letter from the developer, Ken Applebaum, requesting a one-year extension for the preliminary plat of the Pilot Knob Office Park. A copy of this letter is attached. The City Council granted a one-year extension to the preliminary plat for the Pilot Knob Office Park on July 7, 1981. At the September 29, 1981 Annual Planned Development Review, the City learned that there had been no further progress on the Pilob Knob Office Park. Since September 29, 1981, Ken Applebaum has donated a portion of the lot in question to a charity for construction of a Kinder Care Center. Because of unfavorable economic conditions, there are no further plans for the office com- plex in the lot. DO/jack NOTE: Staff has reviewed the ponding problems to date associated with the lot in which the Kinder Care is to be built. Attached to this memo is a site plan of the once proposed office canplex and the future shopping center. Staff has determined that the pond to the northeast of the proposed Kinder Care location has the capacity to handle the storm drainage from the Kinder Care site. W RA R E I L • • (612) 432.8131 REALTORS auiwn• 1000 EAST 146th STREET • SUITE 220 • BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 MEMBER "MLS' . . . REAL ESTATE . . . MORTGAGE INSURANCE May 26, 1981 Mr. Thomas Hedges.. City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: .I received a letter from Kurtis G. Ulrich, a planning assistant working for the City of Eagan. He put me on notice that the preliminary plan of the Pilot Knob Office Park was coming up for renewal. Because of the mortgage market being what it it, which means there is absolutely no money available for this project in the mortgage money market, I would appreciate it very much if you would give this project a year's extension. Maybe if I am lucky, sometime within the next year the mortgage money available for projects like this will be funded again. In the event that there are any questions about my re- quest, please feel free to call me. Thank you again for your efforts for the extension. Yours very truly, MARREL`L`,` INC. Kenneth Appelbaum KA/jww cc: Kurtis G. Ulrich 93 tJ�AY 2'i j�61 0 0 TO: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. PINKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1981 RE: PRELIMItURY PLAT - KINDER CARE ADDITION (RICHARD NORDLUND) At the Advisory Planning Ccrm-Lission Meeting of Noverrber 24, 1981, there was concern pertaining to the proposed elimination of the ponding area that was proposed to be incorporated as a part of the previous Pilot Knob Office Park proposal. This ponding area was meant to provide a sedimentation basin for the surface water run off from the parking areas of the proposed Pilot Knob Office Park conplex. Its location in the southeast corner (Kinder Care proposed site location) was based on the matter of convenience due to existing topography and terrain of the property in question. This major outlet is proposed to be directed to the north and east into a series of ponds to be located adjacent to Duckwood Drive north of the Hidden Oaks Townhouse omplex. These Duck - wood Drive drainage ponds have been constructed as a part of the site grading for the Pilot Knob Shopping Center ccrrplex. During this grad- ing, the staff insured that excess capacity was made available in the pond proposed to be located in Lot 17 of the Pilot Kncb Shopping Cen- ter plat. This excess capacity aunbined with a small sedimentation pond to be located somewhere within the Pilot Knob Office Park PUD pro- perty will be more than adequate to provide the required storm water detention system that would be required from its development. The location of this sedimentation pond within the Pilot Knob Office Park PUD property is not a critical factor. This is due to the fact that is meant to be a sedimentation pond and is not meant to provide excessive storm water storage volumes. Once these ponds have been con- nected, they will have a positive gravity storm sewer outlet all the way to the Minnesota River through the Fish Lake and Blackhawk Izke drainage basins. In sumrary, the proposed location of the Kinder Care Center would re- quire a relocation of the previously proposed sedimentation pond to the north. This will not have any detrimental effect on grading, drainage and/or erosion. I will be available to answer further questions pertaining to this information at the Planning Camussion Meeting of December 22, 1981. Respectfully submitted,, / Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Ttbrks U11 the M/nn*Dpo/n r(5_d*roDon for Jewish Service LA SALLE COURT, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 • PHONE 339-7491 December 29, 1981 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Manager City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road St. Paul, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: Mr. Robert C. Fors of Midwest Builders Realty, has informed the Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service of the discussions which have taken place at the recent meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Eagan. As a result of our conversation with Mr. Fors, I would like to take this opportunity to provide you with some information which should be helpful in this matter. On December 26, 1980, Kenneth and Sally Appelbaum, Robert H. and Naomi R. Karatz, of Phoenix, Arizona contributed a piece of property located in Eagan described as: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Pilot Knob Heights First Edition, lying Westerly of the West Line of Outlot G and its Southernly extension thereof, and lying Easterly of the Plat of First Minnehaha Edition, according to the recorded plat thereof, on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Dakota County, Minnesota. This contribution was made by the families mentioned above, and equally divided between the Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service and the Jewish Federation of Greater Phoenix. Each of these charitable institutions are appropriately registered within their own States, and are recognized as 501-C-(3) institution by the Internal Revenue Service. For your information, such contributions of land to charitable institutions are not unusual and are consistent with similar contributions that are made regularly to such institutions as Catholic Charities, various churches, the University of Minnesota, and other charitable and non-profit institutions. Both families have a long record of philanthropic contributions to the Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service as well as Mr. Karatz's contributions to the Jewish Federation of Greater Phoenix after moving his residence from Minnesota to Arizona. Each of these contributions have been placed in the respective Endowment Funds of each of the Federations. C = _ [, 2 Morris M. Sherman, President — Judy Goldenberg, Sheldon Levin, Stephen E. Lieberman, Frank Trestman, Vice Presidents — Stanley Schweitzer, Treasurer — Morton Silverman, Financial Secretary — Rove Rosenbloom, Secretary CONI The Officers and Theresa Berman, Corrinre Birnberg, Thomas D. Feinberg, William Goldenberg, Mike Kunin, Shells Lieberman, Julius 1 T T FE. Rivkin, Susie Selcer, Richard Spiegel, David Weinberg Herman S. Markowitz—Ek ecutive Director, Mitchel Lazarus—Associate Director for Planning & Budgeting, Jay Jacobson—Campaign Director 96 0 0 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Manager -2- December 29, 1981 City of Eagan Marel Realty was asked to assist in the sale of the land in order for the Endowment Funds to have those resources available for the philanthropic purposes of each of the institutions involved. Mr. Appelbaum, who is involved in the real estate business, was authorized by the Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service to assist in the obtaining of an extension of the Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) and the preliminary plan for the real estate in question. At no time has Mr. Appelbaum acted without the authorizationor knowledge of the Federation concerning this property. It is our understanding that the zoning for this property is consistent with the use, as requested, by the Kinder Kare, Inc. The realtor representing Kinder Kare, Inc., has informed the Federation that there was no variance requested of the Planning Commission for the use of this property. The intent of the Federation is to be sure that this transfer to Kinder Kare, Inc., is handled in a business like and legal fashion. If there are any questions that you may have, please feel free to call. Thanking you in advance for your consideration. HSM:mav cc: Morris Sherman, Esq., President Robert C. Fors, Builders Realty Since^ ly yours, T Herman S. Markowitz, Executive Director 97 0 0 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FR3M: PLANNING ASSISTANT OSBERG DATE: JANUARY 14, 1982 RE: KINDER CARE FACILITY PP=MINARY PLAT At the December meeting of the Advisory Planning Carmission, a motion was passed reoamending denial of the preliminary plat application for a Kinder Care day care center. The reasons for denying the application are outlined in the minutes of the December meeting. Since that time, staff has received several informational items from the applicant that may provide the City Council with a better understanding of the Kinder Care situation. The Advisory Planning Commission expressed a concern regarding the ownership of the lot in question. The lot is a part of the Pilot Knob Office Park which was given preliminary plat approval by the City Coun- cil on January 5, 1980. City Planner Runkle has received a letter since the December 1981 APC meeting explaing what has transpired with the Kinder Care lot. Apparently, the previous owner, Ken Applebaum, has donated the land to the Minneapolis Federation For Jewish Service, who has sold the land to Kinder Care for use as a day care center. The re- maining parcel of land has also been donated by Mr. Applebaum to the Minneapolis Federation For Jewish Service. There are still plans for constructing the office complex on the remaining land once the Kinder Care facility is constructed. Staff has explained to the interested individuals that if the Kinder Care facility is constructed, this would not be in compliance with the original preliminary plat of the Pilot Knob Office Park. Due to this inconsistency, the City Council may re- quire a revised site plan of the Pilot Knob Office Park once the appli- cant seeks to begin construction of the office canplex. The applicant has submitted a site plan illustrating how the office oerrplex could be incorporated with the Kinder Care facility. In essence, the applicants want to proceed with the Kinder Care facility now and the necessary procedure will be followed once the office cmplex is built. Another concern of the Advisory Planning Commission was the proposed location of a ponding area on the site. The original preliminary plat for the Pilot Knob Heights Office Park had a ponding area located where the Kinder Care facility is proposed. Public Works Director Colbert submitted a metro to the Advisory Planning Commission for its December meeting explaining the ponding situation in the Pilot Knob Office Park. Apparently the location of Kinder Care facility would require a reloca- tion of the ponding area, and this would present no major problem. To summarize, it appears as if the transfer of ownership of land has been carried out properly. The applicants are hoping to construct the Kinder Care facility first and then deal with the office car>plex. There are no problems with the relocation of the ponding area. CYO/jack 94 APC Minutes December 22, 1981 KINDER CARE DAY CARE CENTER - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of Kinder Care and Richard Nordlund for preliminary plat and conditional use permit for day care center on a part of Lot 1, Block 1, Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition was next convened by the Chairman. Mr. Robert Fors, a Realtor, was present for the applicant. A number of neighboring property owners were present and objected to the location of the proposal noting that in 1980 an application for preliminary plat on the lot provided for a ponding area in that location. The Planning Commission members discussed in detail and had questions about the application including Doris Wilkins who asked whether Kenneth Applebaum in May of 1981, who requested an extension of time for approval of preliminary plat was auth- orized to do so. It was noted that the owner of the property as of December 1980, were the Minneapolis Jewish Federation and Phoenix Jewish Federation, according to Quit Claim Deeds granted to those two organizations. There were also objections as to the location of the building and as to whether the use as a Day Care Center was premature for the area. There were also concerns about how the balance of the lot will be developed, noting the preliminary plat originally submitted did not provide for a building in this location. Wilkins moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend denial of the applica- tion for the following reasons: 1. It does not comply with the plan submitted by the then owner when the preliminary plat application was approved in 1980. 2. That there appears to be a technical defect in the extension of the original preliminary plat by Mr. Applebaum. 3. The location of the pond is uncertain at the present time, noting that location for the Kinder Care was the original location for the pond. 4. It is necessary to review the entire lot for development purposes, rather than only a portion of the lot for to determine the use of the balance of the lot. All voted in favor except Krob who voted no. Wilkins then moved and Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of the conditional use permit. All voted in favor. 2 q9 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Thirteen I.R. FINANCING - KINDER CARE B. Richard Nordlund for the Scheduling of a Public Hearing to Consider Industrial Revenue Financing in the Amount of $325,000 for Kinder Care -- The City has received an application from Kinder Care Learning Centers requesting industrial revenue financing for the Kinder Care facility outlined in the last agenda item. The application is requesting industrial revenue financing in the amount of $325,000. The minimum size defined on the application for in- dustrial revenue financing is $500,000. Apparently, Kinder Care Learning Center has included the land in the requested industrial revenue financing amount, and, therefore, the $325,000 would be reduced by the $40,000 to $285,000. Kinder Care Learning Centers is specifically requesting a variance to the $500,000 policy. Enclosed on page 101 is a letter from First Corporate Services, Inc., who is han i.ng the application for Kinder Care Learning Centers. The City Administrator would not allow this item on the agenda until the preliminary plat and conditional use permit items acted on by the APC were heard by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny setting a public hearing to consider industrial revenue financing for Kinder Care Day Care Center, and if approved, the public hearing would be -set for the February 16, 1982 meeting. X00 0 FIRST CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. INVESTMENT BANKERS SUITE 206, 822 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 16121 332.0955 November 24, 1981 Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor and City Council: 0 On behalf of Kinder -Care Learning Centers, I am requesting that the City Council wave its minimum of $500,000 for Commercial Revenue Bond financing. This particular project will only cost $325,000 but the value to the residence and business community of Eagan will be substantial. Kinder -Care Learning Centers operate in 35 states and have approximately 735 day care centers. They are publicly held and the undisputed leader in providing quality day care. One of their new concepts, which they will be introducing in the proposed Eagan facility, is Kindustry. This plan was designed to aid industry in solving some of the serious problems encountered with absenteeism and employee loss because of the lack of industry's ability to alleviate the child care problem. The annual report I have enclosed further discusses this concept. The Education Department at Kinder -Care is continually up grading their programs and assisting the staff at every center with workshops and in-house training. Quality has taken on a very important meaning at Kinder -Care. I would like to have the opportunity to have Donna Goff the Midwest Director discuss the importance of day care in your community, and to explain how Kinder - Care would fit into your local situation. Donna will be available at the public hearing, or at anytime the council may wish her to be available for discussion. If the council would lend its support to this project thru the issuance of Indurstrial Revenue Bond financing, I think the community would benefit from this much needed service. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, FIRST_,CORPOPLATE SERVICES, INC. Richard J. Nordlund RJN/pka Enc . /01 Ll Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Fourteen 40, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR KNOB HILL C. Edmund B. Dunn of Blackhawk Park Associates for Rezoning from A to PD to Include Limited Business, Townhouse and Condominium Development and for a Preliminary Plat Approval of Knob Hill, Consisting of 40 Acres -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the November 24, 1981 meeting, and due to a continuance, was again considered at the December 22, 1981 APC meeting. The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 40 acres from A to PD containing approxi- mately 10.5 acres of LB and 19.7 acres of residential which would consist of 84 condiminium units and 102 townhouse units. The second application submitted is a request for a preliminary plat consisting of approximately 40 acres and containing eleven lots of which five lots are proposed for limited business use and six lots are proposed for residential development. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval, of the rezoning and preliminary plat sub- ject to the conditions outlined in the attached minutes. For addi- tional information on this item, refer to the City Planner's report, a copy of which is enclosed on pages IoS through //+ . For additional information, please refer to a memo addresse y the City Planner, a 'copy of which is enclosed on pages //S' through For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of t ose minutes enclosed on pages (1 through Also enclosed on pages 11,0 through IZZ is an updated repor on the proposed preliminary report of Knob Mill as prepared by the City Planner. This information should provide supplementary data to the report which was prepared for the Advisory Planning Commission meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the recom- mendation of the Advisory Planning Commission to approve the Knob Hill preliminary plat and rezoning. Special Note: Enclosed without a page number is a copy of an infor- mational booklet on the proposed Knob Hill Addition. 107- 0 SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: APPLICATION SUBMITTED; CITY OF EAGAN REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT - KNOB HILL OF EAGAN EDMUND B. DUNN, BLACKHAPIK PARK ASSOCIATES SE4 OF THE SES OF SECTION 21 A (AGRICULTURAL) NOVA BER 24, 1981 NOVEMBER 19, 1981 DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 40 acres from A (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development District) containing approximately 10.5 acres of LB (Limited Business District) and 19.7 acres of residential which would consist of 84 condominium units and 102 townhouse units. The second application submitted is a request for a preliminary plat consisting of approximately 40 acres and will contain 11 lots of which 5 lots are proposed for Limited Business use and 6 lots are proposed for residential development. LAND USE AND ZONING Presently, the parcel is zoned A (Agricultural District) The land use plan desig- nates the parcel as LB (Limited Business District) in the eastern h of the proposed development. The land use designation on the western half of the development is R-2 (mixed residential) with a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed residential development has a net density of approximately 9 dwelling units per acre which would fit the R-3 land use designation according to the land use plan which is mixed residential with a density between 6 and 12 dwelling units per acre. If this development proposal is approved, the City would have to amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan to change this R-2 land use designation to an R-3 land use designation going through the amendment process with the Metropolitan Council. As you may recall, some of this development is tied into the Blackhawk Park Planned Development. Within the past few years, there has been a land use designation change from Blackhawk Park Planned Development to this particular parcel. The land use change was to eliminate LB (Limited Business) zoning which was proposed in the Blackhawk Park Planned Development south of Countv Road 30 and east of Thomas Lake Road. This land use change was transferred to the area north of County Road 30 and west of Pilot Knob Road. The proposed development plan has incorporated this pro- posed change in the site work and development preparation of the Knob Hill prelimi- nary plat. The only portion in the overall plat which would be in question is the 17 acres designated for residential developnent. As mentioned earlier, this has been designated on the Comprehensive Guide Plan as R-2 (mixed residential) with a /0 3 C� C CITY OF EAGAN KNOB HITS, OF EAGAN NOVEMBER 24, 1981 PAM 'M density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. This particular development will consist of a net density of 9 dwelling units per acre which is a higher density than desig- nated on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The overall plat contains 11 lots and street right-of-way designation. In review- ing the overall plat, it appears the right-of-way for County Road 31, or Pilot Knob Road, is proposed for 55'. This would be adequate for the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. The right-of-way of 55' should also be dedicated on Lot 5, Block 2 of Knob Hill preliminary plat. The right-of-way for County Road 30 will be 155' north of the existing centerline of County Road 30. The reason for this additional right-of-way is that the County is proposing to shift the alignment of County Road 30 to the north because of the grades of the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and County Road 30. The applicant has not shown this 155' right-of-way dedication on the preliminary plat. It is the'staff's understanding that the applicant wishes to have the County acquire this excess right-of-way instead of dedicating the entire 1551. It is staff's un- derstanding that the applicant is revising the preliminary plat which will be ready for the public hearing to show the 155' as an outlot in order to preserve the right- of-way for the upgrading of County Road 30 and Pilot Knob Road. The outlot would still be in the ownership of the Dunn Company and the Dunn Company would expect the County to purchase the additional right-of-way required. SITE PLAN REVIEW LAND USE ACREAGE BUILDING COVERAGE MQUIRED PARKING PMPOSED PARKING Townhouse 14.5 18.4% 255 255 Condo/Apt. 5.1 14.5% 210 96 Office 10.22 19.0% 1,062 1,070 - Note: The proposed outside parking spaces for the townhouse development would include the individual driveways. The driveways should be set back at least 20' from all setbacks or drives. - Note: The parking for the condominium space and 1'h open parking space! ed 210 parking spaces. development requires 1 covered parking . The developer is short of the requir- - Note: The parking spaces for the offices on the original site plan illustrates 1,070 spaces. With the outlot for additional right-of-way would remove 67 parking spaces. Therefore, there is a net deficit of 59 parking spaces for the overall office complex. - Note: The required square footage for the condominium project with the 21 one - bedroom, 42 two-bedroom and 21 -three bedroom would require 6.4 acres. The net area proposed is 5.1 which gives a deficit of 1.3 acres. 104 L CITY OF EAGAN KNOB HILL OF EAGAN NOVEMBER 24, 1981 PAGE THREE In reviewing the overall site plan, it appears all setbacks for buildings are met with the exception of the spacing between the townhouse units at the "L" locations. These setbacks should be increased to 301. The parking for the office corrplex as stated earlier will have to be relocated and a 20' green area shall be provided between any public street and the parking lot. If approved, the preliminary plat and planned developrrent shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. Outlots shall be established on the plat for the additional right-of-way which is to be acquired by Dakota County for the upgrading of County Road, Diffley Road. 2. The plat shall be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comnent because the plat abuts two County roads. 3. A planned development agreement and development agreerent shall be completed prior to the starting of the lst Addition. The planned development agreement shall not exceed a 5 -year term. 4. A homeowner's association by-laws shall be reviewed by the City for each phase of development. 5.- A staging plan shall be required to determine how the area is to be developed. 6. A detailed landscape plan shall be provided with each phase and a landscape bond for an adequate amount shall be required for each final phase of the de- velopment. 7. The development shall require all the parking spaces that have been stated in the planner's report under required parking unless otherwise approved by the City Council. 8. The plat shall be subject to the Park Committee's recommendations and commnts for park dedication on the proposed development. 9. The developer shall re -design the parking layouts on Lot 7, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3 in order to provide for the additional parking spaces required. 10. All other City ordinances shall be applicable to the overall develorinent plan. DCR/jach P CITY OF EAGAN KNOB HILL OF EAGAN NOVEMBER 24, 1981 PAGE FOUR 0 ENGINEERING RECOnMET MTIONS 11. A 55' half right-of-way must be dedicated adjacent to County Road 31 and a 155' half right -o£ -way must be dedicated adjacent to County Road 30. 12. A ponding and drainage easement must be dedicated providing for a high water elevation of 886.0 and/or 5.0 acre feet of storage capacity for the drainage basin referenced as DP -27. 13. A detailed grading and drainage plan must be submitted for formal approval prior to final plat application. 14. All easements required by the installation of an internal utility distri- bution system shall be dedicated as a condition of final plat approval. 15. This property shall accept the additional assessments associated with the upgrading of the zoning of this property for trunk area utilities. It shall also agree to acceptance of the future assessments associated with the upgrading of County Road 30 and 31. 16. An 8' bituminous trailway shall be constructed within a 10' strip outside of the anticipated future dedication of public right-of-way along County Road 30 and County Road 31. TAC/jach /O6 0 0 TO: ADVISORY PLANNING CODM4ISSIO.V, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1981 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - KNOB HILL OF EArAN (THE DUNN COMPANY) The Public [+brks Department has the following items to be considered by the Planning Commission for their review of the proposed above -referenced pre- liminary plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and watermain of sufficient size and capacity is available adjacent to this property to provide the required service anticipated by this proposed development. The property generally slopes to the north and west towards the existing drainage basins located in the north central portion of this proposed plat. These drainage basins presently have existing storm sewer outlet available which provides positive storm sewer drainage from this site to the Minnesota River by way of the Blackhawk Lake trunk storm sewer which has recently been completed. All drainage generated from this plat will be conveyed by way of an internal storm sewer system into these internal drainage basins prior to discharging into the referenced storm sewer system which is located in the northwest corner of this plat. A detailed grading plan has not been submitted. There appears to be some minor grade differentials created along the westerly boundary and the north- east corner that will require slope easements frau the adjacent property aa- ners based on preliminary spot elevations submitted on their preliminary grading plan. Based on these proposed spot elevations, it appears that the maximum grade of any street located within this proposed plat would not ex- ceed 5% which is well within the subdivision ordinance requirements. SITE PLAN The proposed layout of the internal public streets takes into consideration the separation between the commercial and residential uses of this property in addition to the differential in the topographv elevations between the southeast corner and the northwest corner of this property. Knob Drive, which provides the internal access for the proposed commercial use of this property, has its northerly entrance opposite Berry Ridge Road at its inter- section with Pilot Knob Road. This is in conformance with the proposed major intersection access north of the future intersection of Pilot Knob Road with Diffley Road. The southerly intersection of Knob Drive with County Road 30 is approximately 480' west of the intersection of the two County roads in the ,southeast corner. This is adequate for future improvements to County Road 30 in addition to maintaining adequate site distance for this intersection. 0% 0 0 Engineering Report - Knob Hill of Eagan November 24, 1981 Page two Knob Lane has its proposed intersection lined up with the existing Heine- Strasse Road and provides for a continuation through the property adjacent to and westerly of this proposed plat. Until such time as Knob Lane can be continued to the west, there is adequate room for maintenance vehicles to turn around with the proposed location of the private drives in the north- west corner of this plat. EASE=S AND RIGHTS-0F-WhY A 55' half right-of-way must be dedicated adjacent to County Road 31 to pro- vide for the future upgrading of Pilot Knob Read. 14hen County Road 30 is upgraded in the future, its present intersection with County Road 31 will be relocated approximately 80' north of this existing location. This will require the dedication of a 155' half right-of-way adjacent to County Road 30 to provide for this proposed future relocation of County Road 30 to the north. Internal easements necessary for a utilitydistribution system will have to be determined upon the final detail design of this system. Upon completion of that design, the required easements will be dedicated as a part of the final plat. A ponding easement must be dedicated around the internal ponding areas of sufficient dimension to incorporate the 886.0 high water elevation and/or 5.0 acre feet of storage capacity above the 882.0 controlled water elevation provided by the existing storm sewer outlet for this drainage basin. ASSESSMENTS This property has previously been assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer assessments. However, it was assessed at the existing Agricultural zoned use. With the proposed development of this property to its anticipated zoning, the difference in trunk area assessments should be collected as a condition of preliminary plat approval. In addition, lateral benefit from trunk sanitary sewer will have to be assessed based on benefit received of the existing trunk sanitary sewer located adjacent to the west property line. Lateral benefit from trunk water will have to be assessed due to benefit received from the existing trunk watermain located within County Road 30 adjacent to the southerly boundary of this proposed plat. In addition to these referenced assessments, this property will be responsible for all costs associated with providing internal lateral utility distribu- tions to service this plat. In addition, a condition of the development agreement should provide for the acceptance of future assessments associated with the upgrading of County Road 30 and/or County Road 31. I will be available to discuss in further detail any questions associated with this plat at the Planning Commission Meeting of November 24, 1981. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. 108 Director of Public Works TAC/jack ^ 26 UNIT BLOCK R •� L UVJ LOT 3 . 30 11T . I �R-\ ■ OK 2 %•! L B BLOCK MOT 5 • i Ili : • - i 2 • I I 1 �. • •�• O . • I I1.111u • Y _ / • i i i •• _ 7.000 .F. 1 22 UNITS • BLOC 2/LOT 6 i �-3 BLOCK 2 •.•`• `� j. - J� ' LOT 2 : P •• ••,••' •••• • OO • �� E i • i _ �I3ISTORY III BLOCK 2/LOT j 48 UNITS IlI� lllil� it •• BLOCK 2 - •- ii�4 • LOTI COUNTY 30 A�i�'Y_en ;r5 E • Ll NOTES 1 uv^.w ec vc uLrt r.+.cLmpupf n� acc•+¢m soe -I !- DUNN QF AL FST>TQ .r NpNA44MQNT INC COUNTY ROAD 30 (WILD WOOD LANE) � N Iv I C C� -.-,...�-._-.._._.:. Sd GQ6UMINpQY R4T •-• _: a/r/O �r.4-.-. .,ay.s .vsa. ss«�,u i.c KNOB HILL 110 acc•+¢m soe -I !- DUNN QF AL FST>TQ .r NpNA44MQNT INC .._..•��...e —..—c .EGEND. vc._ rm.o.c .,ar,c M. --"•_ •• ••-•• ,�• � ••• >—��rtTy .ueaw�rcer w.rce ' _--_ ' `,, _� // `�. �...• ee aa.r,e�I. �'/ me w, Z RDA II I�V , �� .~ % /%f� �� � ��/ � � .ice ..� -� /•.I� _' j °I IIS _ .W'/,�� _ � � �./ � /'/•1u � I^Ir .J . q, P l ��� / I m P.nm ��}• _ •N LOIJNTY ROAD 30 WILD WOOD LAN ) to •yV,T. - S®�[wn �RELIMINAQY &R4DIN4 AND •DRAINA" MANI: `•• 1-1V ,'LY coe •-• , ✓M .•••c w w.ssoc+ c..c KNOB WILL .. �• ---- MANN CESTATE .rte .,r. .. r.+.. _._._. MANAbEMZMENT INL (A � _�� .fir`" ';/;�,'--,�,,•'; - ^- rr /` -- \1'� e� /''- /i /�///•/ •tel \ B•�/-,_�D RD 6Y \� �/ III '� ' /' / V :./� � •Y^ Z QOAD 3 I , r i o / NMI - 0/ • _-- �� 94, .__ .—.__ _.. ... —_:. i,.,. Y`•M•+ -1- LOUNTY ROAD 30 (WILD WOOD LANE)-_-- LZ� -.... _.. .,..°:':::: ..:...... ...... _- W r Oto L C, iQ6LIMINAQY UTILITIES ULAN v¢cra¢ca cp¢ J KNOB WILL DUNN Q6GIN . r.;fd .11!11 ®�'_�_.._ �....._. � .v. a ,ru. w •:., MANA66M�NT ING � 3 112 6 �� •1.. S -1 _ / „�'; RB" IInd GB -�• i--- 1 i .. .; GOLF • _ ••� 1'--� _ h Z. Indy ,�.y� ,. NONIMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT R.I• L:_::� Ind 1. S ..;e. 'I' I �Ii Ind .- v Ind `G.B' II Y ~RII In'- _!•• "°' `-. " _ � R8� R IV R III I •_ •� I, _ \\ Ra ,/� RI, D cl '. Inc Ind. ' NB �g°� R-01 P RIII �/i -� r v ' RII l'R-II—. D' - ' j'�,� i�� _ — . � ��nd L�-11 --- '• CSC a,RI:,..0 GOLF F ROW ro ®[L.Bj RIII R-I o ,R-i[7 , / R II P. ..Ind �'_ o RIII :.r, y 'n R'I - 'RII f .:RIS R-1 r R-II�q R-11 -R-11 P ' -III J- R1 LB N Tr, �:,: II . E T..:� NB 1• ". R-III RB i R-1111 7 ' `: �" -- CSC/GB R-III RIII R-III RII .• R-II R-III- ;- LCJE, �IIi. P r71 , P / P P RII T 2' w, R-II R-11 '�P i 1 �' I, •_ -. R-1 RI P ,,,� l -- \Cpp SC 3' c PI(' i IS R-1 12 R 1 R-1 P GOLF `•>, c�au,v ` P T i... w R-II DPR-II _\,IJ 1'.b . r•-. - .. `I`..�I Ra R:II ::.--- yy r ..P l irn, ALLEY ��3 "r ? P F 77-2 A A �;p�� K Y-i�'H R _ —A J�coY 47 R -1c ----T--- _ �-R -A R_i p i + HII_'_ANDALE �j-Z i� ; Y A AR1 r4.. . / A o / / J 3D - a jP -3 �. 3'6 a / ° ' F R R B I a/ ao NR , R-3 RiB PF 73 oc, E - tT OT Q y ' THOMAS I' I � �� l v A 3 HEIGHrt� �} R FF �T ri I y 1 1 O L k .T4JU E MFNT ..1.. r� mPF tNrriA. J'' 'WIL-� PK tyg�p. ,1 yyq y S A FA R I � 1� ~' Is I EAGAN . "„I - — r1: w 1 R -I R-1 0 0 TO: JOE HARRISON, CHAIRPERSON AND THE ADVISORY PLANNING COWISSION FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: DEC0�BER 17, 1981 RE: INFORMATION REGARDING KNOB HILL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT At the November 24, 1981 Advisory Planning Commission Meeting, a number of ques- tions regarding Knob Hill Planned Development had surfaced. These questions are as follows: A. Revision of the Comprehensive Gide Plan - The Ccmorehensive Plan revision would be a short form which the City staff would fill out and submit to the Metropolitan Council. It is staff's understanding that this revision would not be determined significant and would require the process of approx- imately 30 days from the time the application has been submitted until the Metropolitan Council took action on the amendment to Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. It is staff's understanding that we were not to submit the re- vision but to inform you as to how the revision process would work. If the development plan as provided is approved, then staff would process the amendment to the Comprehensive Gide Plan. Staff, at this time, did not want to process the amendrent just to see if it would be approved or not. If the development proposal is approved, then it should be subject to approval of the amendment by the Metropolitan Council. B. Height Limitation - Staff has prepared a memo on height limitation which a meeting had been scheduled on December 3, 1981. This meeting was re- scheduled to December 17, 1981. Therefore, at this time, staff does not have a direction in regard to the height limitations within zoning dis- tricts in the City at this time. Hopefully, at the December 22, 1981 Ad- visory Planning Commission Meeting, there will be a recmmPndation from the Subcommittee in regard to height limitations in the City of Eagan. C. Determination of Right -of -Way with Dakota County on Difflev Road and Re - „mss unecrceu wird uaxota L-ounty regarcnng right-ot-way for Diffley Road. This right-of-way has been determined that the centerline of present Diff - ley Road will be shifted 80' to the north. The 80' plus a 75' half right- of-way for a portion of Diffley Road will be required with the plat. On Pilot Knob Road, there is also a 75' half right-of-way which will be re- quired for turn lanes for the intersection of Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road. It is staff's understanding that the developer has revised the de- velopment plan which will show the aligrvrents of Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road as required by the County. At the present time, staff does not have the exhibit to submit with this memo, but they will be provided at the December 22 APC Meeting. In regard to acquisition and dedication, it has been the policy that the developer will dedicate his fair share of roadway right-of-way. Therefore, staff will be requesting a dedication of approximately 75' on Difflev Road and 75' on Pilot Knob Road. The additional road right-of-way needed on Diffley Road will be platted as )1s r] APC Metro December 17, 1981 Page two 0 outlots and then will be able to be acquired by Dakota County. As stated earlier, these exhibits will be provided at the December 22, 1981 APC Meet- ing. D. Whether the housing should be retained as R-2 density rather than increased to an R-3 density - It is staff's understanding that the developer is reduc- ing the density of the development proposal. It is staff's understanding that approximately 20% of the units will be decreased in the residential portion of the plat. The locations of the buildings are not going to change or is the street alignment going to change within the plat. The developer is in the process of just reducing the number of [nits which he had origi- nally submitted. Again, these exhibits are being prepared and will be available at the December 22 APC Meeting. In regard to the revision of the density frtan R-2 to R-3 will be a philosophical discussion that the Ad- visory Planning Commission will have to look at and make a determination if they will allow either the R-2 or the R-3. The site plan in regard to elevations and locations of structure, the developer has taken into account the topography and the trees on the site. Therefore, the location of the buildings will not be changing; it will just be the number of units which will be allowed to make the project economically feasible. E. There was discussion concerninq the revision of the a uic lvvi ulWc.7l. .,(UaUL JU UL U1111CY t(j anQ Yl10r AnOO )1O a — Staff has reviewed the minutes to try to see if the proposed change in land use from the Neighborhood Business on Thomas Lake Road and County Road 30 was transferred to the NW quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and County Road 30. Staff has not been able to uncover any documentation in regard to this proposed change. However, a staff report dated June '79 referenced this change with the platting of Thomas Lake Heights. Therefore, staff will continue to check to see if they can uncover any documentation in regard to the land use change at this location. According to the 1974-75 Land Use Guide Plan, this plan indicated that the quadrant in the M1; of Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road was designated Limited Business as far back as 1974-75. The 1980 land Use Plan also de- signates this parcel as Limited Business. If this Limited Business desig- nation would be removed, staff would also have to go through the amendment process to change the land use in this particular area. F. The last concern was in reqard to the nark and ade- quare ror tnls raclllty - Since the November 24, 1981 APC Meeting, the preliminary plat, Knob Hill of Eagan, had been reviewed by the Advisory Park Ccatmittee. The Park Committee recommended that a cash dedication Per unit be made and that one tot lot be provided for the pre-schoolers within this neighborhood. The last recamTendation from the Park Committee was that the developer construct the trail along Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road in accordance with the overall Trail Plan for the City. There- fore, this consideration has already been taken care of by the Park Corr mittee. !/6 If any of you have any questions regarding this memorandum, or would like.addi- tional information that what the staff has provided or will be providing at the December 22, 1981 APC Meeting, please contact me at the City Hall. , r� APC Minutes December 22, 1981 KNOB HILL OF EAGAN - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The continued hearing regarding the application of Edmund B. Dunn of Blackhawk Park Associates to rezone approximately 40 acres from A (Agri- cultural) to PD (Planned Development) with 10.5 acres of limited business and 19.7 acres of residential acreage, together with application for preliminary plat with 11 lots with 5 lots for limited business and 6 lots residential, was next convened by Chairman Joe Harrison. Mr. Dunn was present as was Greg Frank of McCombs Knutson Engineers, Jack Boarman, Architect, and Barton Dunn. Mr. Dunn and Mr. Boarman explained the changes in the plan since the last hearing and also distributed a hand out dated December 15, 1981. Mr. Boarman stated that the right of way configuration for Diffley Road will be revised to accomodate the proposed widening of Diffley Road and that the balance of the area for the right of way will consist of outlots: The Developer indicated that he would expect to be credited against park contribution for construction of the trail, but later, stated that because of the policy of the City in and adjacent to commercial areas, that the developer would pay for the cost of the trail without a credit for park purposes. Mr. Boarman further stated that the request for a variance for 5 stories would not be made at the present time and further, that the developer is recommending 1.5 parking spaces per condominium unit, which is less than the 2.5 spaces required by ordinance. The housing density was of prime concern to the planning commission members and it is noted the density has been reduced from 9.4 dwelling units per acre to 7.7 dwelling units per acre. Mr. Boarman also stated that there is interest in acquiring or constructing two office buildings at the southeast corner of the property and the planning commission members were concerned about architec- tural uniformity of the office building. Mr. Dunn and Mr. Boarman stated that the developer would insist on architectural uniformity. Member Wilkins ex- pressed her opinion that the office buildings in the area were not conducive to the residential character of the neighborhood, including Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road, and also felt that the density was still too high. There was also discussion concerning private recreational areas within the development and the public and private streets shown on the plan. Mr. Runkle stated that 1.5 parking spaces per unit is too low for condominiums and 1.7 to 1.75 units per acre are more appropriate, which later amount was agreed upon by Mr. Dunn. There was also discussion on whether the neighborhood business district zoning had been moved from the Thomas Lake Road area to the northwest quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Diffley Roads, requiring further study. Mr. Boarman argued that for financial purposes, the density for condominiums is necessary and desirable. Krob moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application to rezone 40 acres from Agricultural to Planned Development, with 10.5 acres of limited business, and 19.7 acres of residential, including 60 condominium units and 93 townhouse units, pursuant to the following condi- tions: 1. A planned development agreement and development agreement shall be completed prior to the starting of the 1st Addition. The planned development agreement shall not exceed an 8 year term. 2. Homeowner's association articles and by-laws where applicable, shall be reviewed by the City for each phase of development. 3 IIS 0 0 APC Minutes December 22, 1981 3. A staging plan shall be required to determine how the area is to be developed. All voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no. Krob then moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application for preliminary plat according to the following conditions: 1. Outlots shall be established on the plat for the additional right of way which is to be acquired by Dakota County for the upgrading of County Road 30, Diffley Road. 2. The plat shall be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comment because the plat abuts two County roads. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be provided with each phase and a landscape bond amount approved by the City provided for each final phase of the development. 4. The development shall provide all the parking spaces that have been stated in the planner's report under required parking unless otherwise approved by the City Council, with staff to recommend to Council and Couuncil to approve the parking spaces per unit. 5. The plat shall be subject to the Park Committee's recommendations and comments for park dedication on the proposed development. 6. The developer shall re -design the parking layouts on Lot 7, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3 in order to provide for the additional parking spaces required. 7. All other City ordinances shall be applicable to the overall de- velopment plan. 8. All L B buildings shall be architecturally compatible. 9. That up to 75 foot half right of way shall be dedicated adjacent to County Road 31 and up to 75 foot half right of way shall be dedicated adja- cent to County Road 30, Diffley Road as finally requested by Dakota County with the balance of the proposed Diffley Road right of way in outlots. 10. A ponding and drainage easement shall be dedicated providing for a highwater elevation of 886.0 and/or 5.0 acre feet of storage capacity for the drainage basin referenced as DP -27- 11. A detailed grading and drainage plan shall be submited for formal approval prior to final plat application. 12. All easements required by the installation of an internal utility distribution system shall be dedicated as a condition of final plat approval. 4 IN APC Minutes December 22, 1981 13. The owners of the property shall accept the additional assessments associated with the upgrading of the zoning of this property for trunk area utilities. They shall also agree to acceptance of the future assessments asosciated with the upgrading of County Roads 30 and 31. 14. An 8 foot bituminous trailway shall be constructed within a 10 foot strip inside of the anticipated future dedication of public right of way along County Road 30, Diffley Road, and County Road 31, at the sole cost of the owner at the location finally determined by the City. All voted yes. KATHLEEN SCHWANZ — CONDITINAL USE PERMIT FOR BEAUTY PARLOR The hearing regarding the application of Kathleen M. Schwanz, of 4283 Stirrup Street for conditional use permit for beauty parlor in a residential district was then considered by the planning commission. Ms. Schwanz was present as was one objecting property owner who submitted a Petition indica- ting 25 homes with 18 contacts, 7 opposing, 5 approving and 6 with no opinion. There were concerns about traffic, alleged reduction in house values, possible danger to children with more traffic, etc. The commission members reviewed the ordinance restrictions on home occupation in a residential district. After discussion, Turnham moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of opeartion will be from 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. only. 2. The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. 3. Customer parking must be on site and limited to two (2) customer autombiles. 4. There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business. 5. There shall be no over the counter sale of merchandise. 6. The permit shall be granted on an annual basis. 7. All other applicable ordinances must be followed. All voted yes. j►9 5 •1 , TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 15, 1982 RE: REVISED SITE PLAN AND PRELIMNAM PLAT FOR KNOB HILL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT The public hearing for Knob Hill of Eagan Planned Development was held on November 24, 1981 and continued to December 22, 1981. The Advisory Planning Commission recommended approval of the Planned Development with several changes to be incorporated into the overall site plan. The major change in the site plan was a reduction in dwelling units in the town- house and condominium area. Therefore, the previous report is accurate in regard to land use and zoning. However, the comments and charts will change. The original plan submitted contained: ORIGINAL SITE PIAN LAND USE ACRES BLDG COVERAGE DVM =(', UNITS/ REQUIRED SQUARE FEET PARKDr. PROPOSED PARKING Townhouse 14.5 18.4% 102 DU 255 255 Condo/Apt 5.1 14.58 84 DU 210 96 Office 10.22 19.0% 205,700 SF 1,062 1,070 REVISED SITE PLAN Ouse 14.5 13.4% 93 DU 232 232 Condo/Apt 5.1 12.4% 60 DU 150 110 Office 10.2 19.8% 201,100 SF 1,070 1,070 In comparing the two site plans, the biggest change has occurred in the reduction of the condominiums and townhouse units. The applicant reduc- ed the condominiums by 24 units and has reduced the townhouses by 9 dwell- ing units. The overall net site density for the residential portion is 7.8 dwelling units per acre which is .5% higher than what would be allow- ed in an R-3, or a townhouse zoning district. The requirements presently for a townhouse district is 7.3 dwelling units per acre. The applicant has revised the LB (Limited Business District) by not requesting the 4 -story building which was in the original proposal. The applicant is proposing two 3 -story buildings, one 2 -story building and two 1 -story buildings for a total of 201,100 square feet. Therefore, there is a slight reduction in the square footage of office spaces presented in this plan. However, the building configuration remains somewhat the same. AZO Revised Site Plan for Knob Hill of Eagan January 15, 1982 Page two In reviewing the parking for the individual office buildings, the appli- cant has provided adequate parking for this site. However, the parking spaces may not line up directly with each building. Therefore, a cross easement should be provided to allow transfer of parking spaces from one building to the next. The :major issue is the applicant has provided the required parking spaces for the office buildings. In reviewing the site plan in general, the applicant has provided set- backs fran property lines and between buildings to =re into conformance of all other ordinance requirements. The preliminary plat: the appli- cant also has revised the preliminary plat to show the platting of Outlot A, B and C. Outlot A, B and C will be the new location of Diffley Road, or County Road 30, when the road is upgraded. The applicant is proposing, however, to dedicate the normal street dedications to the County with the plat. However, the excess, which is Outlot A, B and C, are platted as an outlot to be reserved for County Road 30, Diffley Road, to be pur- chased by the County at the time Diffley Road is upgraded. The last item staff would like to mention about this revised plan is that the condominium parcels proposed do not meet the 2.5 parking spaces per unit. In reviewing this proposal, it has been brought to staff's atten- tion a number of times that 2.5 parking spaces per condominium unit is in excess of what is really required to provide adequate parking for con- dominiums. In conversing with a nuTber of other cities, the other cities require a maximuam of 2 parking spaces per condominium unit, and in a study that had been completed in Apple Valley, it had been determined that 1.75 parking spaces per unit is more than adequate to provide the parking for condominiums. Therefore, if the City Council elects, there would be a variance from the 2.5 parking spaces per condominium unit to the 1.75 which is found to be an adequate number. However, the Council may elect to provide 2 parking spaces per unit which would be more than adequate parking for the 60 condominium dwelling units. This appears to be the major changes which have transpired from the original application sub- mittal to the requirements by the Advisory Planning Commission. Therefore, the revised documents have been reviewed by staff in accordance with the Planning Commission recommendations. If the preliminary plat and rezoning is approved, the development proposal shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. That a variance be granted on the condominium parking spaces from 2.5 parking spaces per unit to 1.75 parking spaces per unit. 2. The plat should be subject to Dakota County Plat Commission's re- view and content because the plat abuts two County Roads. 3. A planned development agreement and development agreement shall be completed prior to the starting of the 1st Addition. 4. The planned development agreement shall not exceed a 5 -year /ZI Revised Site Plan for Knob Hill of Eagan January 15, 1982 Page three 5. A homeowners' association and by-laws shall be reviewed by the City for each phase of the development. 6. A staging plan shall be required to determine how the area is to be developed. 7. A detailed landscape plan shall be provided with each phase and a landscape bond for an adequate amount shall be required for each final phase of the development. 8. The plat shall be subject to the Park Committee's recommendations and comments for park'dedication on the proposed development. 9. Cross easements shall be provided on the parking in the commercial areas to allow adequate parking for each building. 10. All other City ordinances shall be applicable to the overall de- velopment plan. DCR/jach 17-71 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Fifteen CONDITIONAL USE -PERMIT REQUEST - KATHLEEN SCHWANZ D. Kathleen M. Schwanz for a Conditional Use Permit to Allow a Bearty Shop in a Residential Area (Saddlehorn Addition) -- A public hearing was held to consider an application submitted to the City by Kathleen M. Schwanz for a conditional use permit to allow a beauty shop in a residential area located on Lot 5, Block 3, Saddle - horn Addition. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the conditional use permit subject to the conditions outlined in their minutes. For additional information on this item, please refer to the Planning Assistant's report found on pages _la4 through %'VFor a copy of the minutes regarding this agenda item, refer to page 110 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the recom- mendation of the APC to approve the conditional use permit to allow a beauty shop as applied for by Kathleen M. Schwanz. 125 0 CITY OF EAGAN 0 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A BEAUTY PARLOR IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT APPLICANT: KATHLEEN M SCHWANZ LOCATION: NEh OF THE N10, OF SECTION 25 EXISTING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF REPORT REPORTED BY APPLICATION SUBMITTED R-1 (RESIDENTIAL) DECEMBER 22, 1981 DEC 14BER 9, 1981 DAVE OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT The application being submitted is for a conditional use permit to allow a beauty parlor in a residential district located at 4283 Stirrup St. An amendment to Section 52.07, Subdivision 4 allows beauty parlors in a residentialul district as a conditional use permit. The applicant is ffilling the requirements of a conditional use permit request. The beauty parlor would be located in a remodeled portion of the home. Remodeling would involve the installation of a new sink, shampoo chair, dryer chair, cut chair, counters, carpeting and a new outside door and walk. The beauty parlor would have two customer parking stalls, which is the requirement outlined in the zoning ordi- nance. If approved, the conditional use permit should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of operation will be from 8:00 A.M. to 8:30 P.M. only. 2. The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. 3. Customer parking must be on site and limited to two (2) customer automobiles. 4. There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business. 5. There shall be no over the counter sales of merchandise. 6. All other applicable ordinances must be followed. DO/jach 1 '2`F 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 52 - ZONING ORDINANCE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, DOES HEREBY AMEND ITS ORDINANCE NO. 52 AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 52.07 - USE DISTRICTS. Subdivision 4. -- Residential Districts. B. Conditional Uses. 3. Beauty parlors, in R-1 districts only, subject to the following conditions: (a) Hours of operation shall be from 8 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. only. (b) The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. (c) The parking shall be on site and shall be limited to two (2) customer automobiles. (d) There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business except for the type of sign that is allowed in R-1 districts. (e) There shall be no over the counter sales of merchandise. Subdivision 6. -- "P" Public Facilities District. A. Permitted Uses. Within any Public Facilities District, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City Council: Public structures, parks, playgrounds, camping grounds, swimming pools, tennis courts, golf courses, churches, schools and hospitals, provided any such purpose is not a commercial profit making enterprise. B. Conditional Uses. Within any Public Facilities District no structure cr land shall be used for the following uses or uses deemed similar by the City except by a conditional use permit: I a5' Y E G�a7..lil� v -.5 TI _a r FiJ- "l F2 Gv.:G ` 7Y _: - ----- - - HAI P- GfAvEL. rf21,& �TI 126 lom d -on �50 �r` P- l�D � N� fiGiF� ' 2B'`(pb I OP -FL k '� PLAN IZ7 MENDOrA \N 1: 0��/ .• �� / 1)11 .. - . . � • ,�� ' `I r� ` f J l / / GIB GOLF c, t,� = _ Ind r.' _ _ r ! ..- - - / ,�,�- :. Ind - COMMERCIAL N �, - . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT _ R - �?• n �. R I• ' - Ind !+ I� Ind EE LB P. Rill III j --: , RII ERIL'„. . R. Ind .. it GB 1lG.' Ind`;, �— RBD�� R-iV ell P Ind. .�NIB B- RllP L LB R -II RII RIII R -III • . 3 R -1I ' 1, ' p ,. f-. Inc. �- — LB RIII ��A - - • u RII R-11 P n Ind RII R,�, 0 R -IV•- `RII. 'III 'R Imo' P` .HALL R-11 R -1 R -II ! IN \ HS 4 �Q I, RlE 1; �P,� R� P _ 24 P RII -II P SRI s•T .a �.•,�:..R-II�__r;'r' R -II � N � LB �, 4.- . � � '• � V �i ��I.:.. C77� N E F - NB (– RIII -RB RIII R_fll:. R-IIh �j.l� •n. } i!`T RIII C_SC/GB/LB "..`\ ,-;)f., -- �� 2 .:E. P = RII ✓,-�. __ R-11 R -II R -II - P •� ,. _. RI P R 1 ~gip^/' .•,..” CSC _ t•'.; L! LB P , `(IR; ay I R -I :. . 1I�a.R-1 - DgIgO -II Q R GbLF ccnwn I , R -II i{{ i...4 I eayi RII I�..'..: R -I. - r. R-11 • - i n ,•,` P. 1rw.'�v� R -11 I' P ..-._ry,/' EY )�...-+.--, W� Cts J 2B ~ / l'`: %%p --�%� L•, -, } I �ROSEMOUNT 4;DDITJON, wES' Puat A ADD s -I ?RA W.D, V 1� <: 1 1 / 6 1 � 24 PF A PF .. W i o-fq a LT W a AUDITOR'S SUED f LnLn Z SUN' U`Ir PD 74-1 o z A A .p �:b�`�ti. it _ � ,�•K.i'�'r- C.� l APC Minutes • • December 22, 1981 13. The owners of the property shall accept the additional assessments associated with the upgrading of the zoning of this property for trunk area utilities. They shall also agree to acceptance of the future assessments asosciated with the upgrading of County Roads 30 and 31. 14. An 8 foot bituminous trailway shall be constructed within a 10 foot strip inside of the anticipated future dedication of public right of way along County Road 30, Diffley Road, and County Road 31, at the sole cost of the owner at the location finally determined by the City. All voted yes. KATHLEEN SCHWANZ - CONDITINAL USE PERMIT FOR BEAUTY PARLOR The hearing regarding the application of Kathleen M. Schwanz, of 4283 Stirrup Street for conditional use permit for beauty parlor in a residential district was then considered by the planning commission. Ms. Schwanz was present as was one objecting property owner who submitted a Petition indica- ting 25 homes with 18 contacts, 7 opposing, 5 approving and 6 with no opinion. There were concerns about traffic, alleged reduction in house values, possible danger to children with more traffic, etc. The commission members reviewed the ordinance restrictions on home occupation in a residential district. -After discussion, Turnham moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hours of opeartion will be from 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. only. 2. The only employee shall be an occupant of the household. 3. Customer parking must be on site and limited to two (2) customer autombiles. 4. There shall be no commercial signs advertising the business. 5. There shall be no over the counter sale of merchandise. 6. The permit shall be granted on an annual basis. 7. All other applicable ordinances must be followed. All voted yes. 130 E 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Sixteen WESLEY MEDIN - WAIVER OF PLAT E. Wesley Medin for Waiver of Plat in Order to Split a 2.3 Acre Parcel into Two (2) Single Family Lots -- A public hearing was held at the December 22, 1981 APC meeting to consider an application by Wesley Medin for a waiver of plat in order to split a 2.3 acre parcel into two single family lots in Section 34. The APC is recom- mending approval to the waiver subject to conditions outlined in the minutes. For additional information on this item,lease refer to the Planning Assistant's report found on pages 13 Z through 13& . For the action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Uommission, refer to page ( 3 7 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the recom- mendation of the APC to approve the waiver of plat as presented. 131 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: WESLEY MEDIN 0 LOCATION: PART OF NE; OF Sha OF SECTION 34, 1325 CARP= HILLS DRIVE EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: MW • 7 L.y5 M910, Fol «moi: .YML•F:31 a�- DAVE OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT An application has been submitted to allow for the subdivision of an unplatted parcel for a single family lot. CCP?)MS The applicant has rsq6ested to split his 2.186 acre parcel into two lots in order to construct another single family home. Presently there is an existing hone on the western portion of the property, and the waiver would allow a home to be con- structed on the eastern portion of the property. The newly created lot would con- sist of 46,525 square feet, or 1.068 acres. Por. Medin's remaining lot would con- sist of 48,704 square feet, or 1.118 acres. Because the parcel is bordered by the Dakota County Park, staff has contacted the Dakota County Park Department. Staff informed the Dakota County Park Department of the application being submitted by Mr. Merlin. Staff suggested to the Park officials that they look into purchasing the land before it is platted. At this time, staff has not been contacted by the Dakota County Park Department. If approved, the application should be subject to the following conditions: 1. No variances should be granted for the newly created lot. 2. Drainage and utility easements should be required along all lot lines. 3. Any assessments on either of the newly created lots will be handled sexy. arately. Presently there are no assessments on either lot. DMO/jack X32- SVGTCH d6,I/QY'CQI ter; WGSLS�j t` aDIrJ 9r. oc 54c. JQ--11-23 (SA4) o�o(3 too. 581420 Nov. Ii 198 9 F tj to � A \ y R New A2cas .A., 48104 sQ• = 1,118 Access 1525 SQ, �{, = I.0�8 AcrLias ------------ s 2) SQ. 2.ts� Acr�Es 133 0 0 65 10 Isrigincertng a Soil Testing -6 t.und Surve,.atg 0 mmung el 101 (:!af :i;,a,; P,:: i n 'Ainnesord 55337 0 SKETCH I FOR WESLEY N H 263� �Ie 30 t toz . 00 ME®IN- R NOTE 7hl-r d.-awily has herA7 ap d a canneefion herew;117 .34, 7-w,-. 27, 1?66. 23 PARCEL A Jai IORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP WrSI , DESCRI?EP A$ O FOR WESLEY N H 263� �Ie 30 t toz . 00 ME®IN- R NOTE 7hl-r d.-awily has herA7 ap d a canneefion herew;117 .34, 7-w,-. 27, 1?66. 23 PARCEL A Jai IORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP WrSI , DESCRI?EP A$ MENDWA /F l GB fi. 6 / 5 Dix nue .. , Ht t /"� � ' (I` • J.,r Ind LB ooF- Rnl RIII` /. Ind r i s / R r N RD a— Ind Psi-v v LJL.--1..-r- R I R-111 J a _ ,.'. - Ind �.— • - ,r ! -�., � R -III • �� (f RII PR.II - NB I2 ��ERRIZLgCSC LBi P _R-1— RII R` - < Q. N ' RI .<.c' c f �^ "�- _.R -II / s_ 69�. �. . v CRY R -II Ind. ii P Q HALL R I R- �i V Com.. FFI .I ./ 'B`!� (' RII � ^r. int tl'R (,k •�. E �j n �� i-. ..© �-• _� R1 �i 1'. .Iii....` - r I i LB G� fEdp�_ _y Roll L': b� LB b -- ✓' �IN /t t�r�i :R1: r Rill RB R -III '.s ry , `.• .r 1 " L /^ j f!! R-111 RIII R Ij , - �tDs CSC/G6/LB ,:�( ��-^��'•`'-IIIIII 1'\ R -III Ral CSC UL_J R -II r II = RRII RII I PO 1 rna> ;+ z l R -II /'� ' NB / I R-1 I� `I l!:; r l` I r • . �IR-li ' --- LB R -III LB �P .:.. - - RB RII R-11 33 R-11 D..or. earn til-� �• t - -h�rN Y i / ,. p �/•� /lf.0 e V .v+� m. , 'p."�n•,• ,R J[4NM � I 4 _ �� � ,,I _� , r_I - AF!•L4 � V.,L LAY 1 HOSEMCt1NT 3 co R—i NR ;R-3 A R-rl PF —2 07 r--A LLJ. PF K rAhT- 7: K 4 A 44A$ �D A 4.1 A PKCPF PF E t if r r' P7 A, I: R-1 R—i PF PARKVIEW GOLF -1*.�,?O." COURSE-;,L3,111:.,.)..13,�j:,3..a.Lii--.,J.-�!,.�i. AX JZ J AYJ. W,1:1a tW J N, APC Minutes December 22, 1981 WESLEY MEDIN - WAIVER OF PLAT - CARRIAGE HILLS DRIVE The hearing regarding the application of Mr. Wesley Medin for waiver of plat, covering a part of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 34, at 1325 Carriage Hills Drive was convened by. the Chairman. Mr. and Mrs. Medin were present and stated that they wanted to readjust the property line, having acquired an adjacent parcel recently. Mr. Medin also stated that the Dakota County Park Director had indicated that there is no funding to purchase the vacant parcel and there were no objections. Harrison moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. No variances shall be granted for the newly created lot. 2. Drainage and utility easements shall be required along all lot lines. 3. Any assessments on either of the newly created lots shall be handled separately. Presently there are no assessments on either lot. All voted yea. BICENTENNIAL 8TH ADDITION The next public hearing convened by Chairman Harrison concerned the application of Federal Land Company for preliminary plat approval of Bicenten- nial 8th Addition. Tim Murnane was present on behalf of the applicant. It was noted that an application had been submitted for preliminary plat approval on the same parcel on April 20, 1981 and because the proposed use did not conform with the lot configuration, approval was not given at that time. It was further noted that the set backs and lot coverage have not been determined by the applicant, and further, that there may be cross -easements required for the proposed office building or the motel. There was discussion concerning the possible variance and it was suggested that the application was premature until the uses and layout are determined with more certainty. The property is currently platted as an outlot and could continue to be in such status until the proposed uses are planned. Bohne moved, Krob seconded the motion to continue the application until the next regular meeting, noting that there is insufficient data that has been submitted as to the layout or the site plan. All voted yea. HEIGHT LIMITATION STUDY City Planner Runkle submitted a study regarding height limitations in Metropolitan area municipalities with some proposals regarding height limita- tion for commercial buildings in the City. No action was taken. I1-7 6 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Seventeen AMUSEMENT DEVICE APPLICATION - COACHMAN OAKS APARTMENT F. Amusement Device Application for Coachman Oaks Apartments - The manager of Coachman Oaks apartments is requesting an application for allowing three (3) game machines to be located at the Coachman Oaks Apartment complex. An amusement device license was previously granted to Coachman Oaks Apartments. At the time of license renewal the Coachman Oaks 'Apartment complex did not renew the amusement device license, and, therefore, it is required that they go through a new application process. The application for license is in order for consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an amuse- ment device application for three game machines to be located in the Coachman Oaks Apartments. PROJECT 353 F. Project 353, Receive/Approve Feasibility Report (T.H. 55 Utility Revisions & Signals) -- Because of the forthcoming temporary con- nection of I-494 with T.H. 55, MnDOT will be completing the up- grading of T.H. 55 from the Airliner Motel on Morris Avenue to the Skelly Station at the south junction of T.H. 149. Because of this upgrading and resulting grade changes, several revisions to existing utilities within state right-of-way had to be performed which are the City's financial responsibility. In addition, instal- lation of signals and future utility crossings necessitated the preparation of a feasibility report delineating all these improve- ments and their estimated cost. Because all costs associated with this project will be funded from the trunk utility and major street fund (signals), there are no assessments associated with this pro- ject. Therefore, it will not be necessary to hold a public hearing. However, this feasibility report is being presented to the Council's attention so that they may be aware of the costs involved. A copy of the feasibility report is enclosed on pages j3q through /S) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive/approve the feasi- bility report for Project 353 for T.H. 55 utility revisions and signals and to authorize the preparation of a cost participation agreement with MnDOT. 1319 REPORT TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 UTILITY REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 353 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA r •: B", Rte, y4adwtda 9 4d, 9,k. 8t P"4 Mr.,nasota 139 13 0 4ad4,4-li & 4, 2335 *4 1...A .Y.y4..,.q 36 sf. P..r. h(--" 55,13 /14...• 612.636-4600 December 28, 1981 Honorable Mayor and City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. .55122 0 J0rc. p 0 uu., Ruur,NnHL'. Nnhrrr I- nrmvR. .E, J .... ph f. And,,I,k. VL. Ib mpurd A. Lrmbng. P.E Nnluud E. 7hors, P f J.rrrrr C. onnn. P.E. 0(� 1956 -grh - 1981A nniversary Counc>: r >i I Re: Trunk Highway 55 Utility Revisions Project 353 File No. 49249 r;h nn R. Cook, P.E. A'ruh A. Gordon. P.E. Fh....r E. Nnyrr. P.E. Ruh.,d IV. Furor, P.E. R,,hrrr G. Srlunrwhl. P.E. Vmun 1.. Snrrala. P.E. pnnnfd C. RurF.rdr. P.E. J ... y A. R.urdmr. P.E. AJark A. Ranson, P.F. Chudra A, Eorkanrr Lrn Al. P.wef, r Rurlun AJ. Ohnn aurid E. Olr.nr Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Trunk Highway 55 Utility Revisions, Project 353. This report covers revision of existing utilities and construction of future utility crossings as part of T.H. 55 Grading and Surfacing S.P. 1909-55. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li Encl. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: December 28, 1981 Reg. No. 14260 Approv d �� as A. Colher Director of Public Works Date: 140 7805a 0 0 TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 UTILITY REVISIONS SCOPE: The Minnesota Department of Transportation is scheduled to upgrade Trunk Highway 55, State Project 1909-55 from a point 0.5 mile east of Blue Gentian Road to a point 0.2 mile east of the south junction of Trunk Highway 149. This construction is proposed for the spring of 1982. Required as part of this construction is the relocation of utilities within T.H. 55 right-of- way which are owned and maintained by the City of Eagan. Mn/DOT will include the necessary construction for the relocation of public utilities as part of their contract. The City of Eagan, however, will be required to reimburse Mn/DOT all costs directly related to construction of utilities owned by the City of Eagan. The purpose of this report is to summarize construction for these public utilities and present a cost estimate outlining these costs as determined by Mn/DOT and Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. Costs will be sepa- rated for each utility trunk fund which they are attributable to. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible and is in accor- dance with the Master Utility Plans for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein will be constructed by Mn/DOT as part of Trunk Highway 55 Grading and Surfacing - State Project 1909-55. The City of Eagan's Utility Enterprise Fund has anticipated and provided for renewal and replacement of its system as required by projects such asldescribed herein. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer: It is proposed as part of this project to construct an 18 inch trunk sanitary sewer beneath T.H. 55 directly south of the northerly Page 1. 7805a P+ 0 0 junction of T.H. 149 as indicated on the drawing included at the back of this report. The 18 inch sanitary sewer will connect to an existing manhole loca- ted directly southwest of T.H. 55. The sanitary sewer will provide service to the area east of T.H. 55 and T.H. 149 and north of Lone Oak Road (C.S.A.H. #26). Also, included is the adjustment of a sanitary sewer manhole located in the right-of-way of T.H. 55 at Frontage Road A. Water Main: Water main construction includes relocation of existing water main due to significant grade changes as part of upgrading T.H. 55. Because of the importance of providing continued service to users of the system and updating the water main pipe material, new ductile iron pipe of the required size will be constructed parallel to the in place old cast iron pipe. The connections will be made by the contractor at night (11 P.M. to 5 A.M.) thus allowing the system to remain in operation during high demands. The water main crossing west of Lawrence Avenue is the only pipe which will increase in size, 8 inch to 12 inch. Also included as part of water main construction is strategic relocation of various hydrants, gate valves, and the placement of insulation at various storm sewer crossings. The figure at the back of this report indicates water main construction required as part of this project. Storm Sewer: Storm sewer construction proposed' as part of this project for the most part is small lateral lines and cross culverts providing drainage within T.N. 55 right-of-way. This storm sewer will be financed entirely by Mn/DOT. The storm sewer segment, however, from the northerly junction of T.H. 149 and T.H. 55 to Pond FP -1 has been sized properly to provide drainage from the area located east of T.H. 149 and T.H. 55. As a result the City of Eagan Page 2. 7805a / will be required to enter into a cost sharing agreement with Mn/DOT•for this segment of storm sewer. The remaining storm sewer included as part of this proiect will be financed entirely by Mn/DOT. Signals: A signalized intersection will be installed at the north and south junctions of T.H. 55 and T.H. 149 together with an installation at T.H. 55 and County Road 26 (Lone Oak Road). In accordance with Dakota County policy, the City of Eagan shares 50% of the costs incurred at County Road intersections for their portion. Included in Appendix B is the cost percentage distribution for each governmental agency based on estimated costs for the signal at County Road 25. Also included is an interconnect system between the two signals at County Road 26 and T.H. 141). Present Mn/Dot policy requires financial con- tribution from governmental agencies based on the "legs" of the intersection for the interconnect system. Included in Appendix B is the required cost dis- tribution for each governmental agency based on estimated costs for the inter- =connect system. EASEMENTS: An easement will be required to construct the 18" trunk sanitary sewer between the southwesterly right-of-way of T.H. 55 to the existing man- hole. It is anticipated this easement will be acquired at no cost. COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A for sani- tars sewer and water main. These cost estimates were prepared by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik 6 Assocs. Detailed cost estimates are also included for storm sewer and signals which were prepared by Mn/DOT for that portion which the City of. Eagan will be required to enter into a cost sharing agreement. A summary of these costs for each governmental agency is as follows:. Page 3. 7805a 14-3 The total estimated costs include 12% for legal, engineering, and adminis- tration due to the fact that design, contract management and field engineering is provided by Mn/DOT and no overhead relating to bonding, construction financing or assessments will be required. Included in Appendix B is 'peak flow comparisons between Eagan and Mn/DOT for determining the cost separation for storm sewer. Costs presented above are estimated costs and will be re- vised based on final costs. ASSESSMENTS: It is not proposed to assess adjacent property owners for any costs presented herein. All costs will be divided accordingly between each trunk fund. Trunk area storm sewer assessments are being levied under Project 302 which will be sufficient to cover the proposed trunk storm sewer extension to the East of T.H. 149. Section 1 (Old Dayton Hudson property) has already been assessed for trunk sanitary sewer previously by agreement. Page 4. /44 7805a Dakota Eagan County Mn/DOT Federal Total Sanitary Sewer $ 17,590 -- -- --. $ 17,590 Water Main 86,500 -- -- -- 86,500 Storm Sewer 76,490 -- $11,480 -- 87,970 Signal: Inter- connect System 6,440 6,440 17,920 $92,400 123,200 TOTAL 5187,020 6,440 $29,400 $92,400 $315,260 The total estimated costs include 12% for legal, engineering, and adminis- tration due to the fact that design, contract management and field engineering is provided by Mn/DOT and no overhead relating to bonding, construction financing or assessments will be required. Included in Appendix B is 'peak flow comparisons between Eagan and Mn/DOT for determining the cost separation for storm sewer. Costs presented above are estimated costs and will be re- vised based on final costs. ASSESSMENTS: It is not proposed to assess adjacent property owners for any costs presented herein. All costs will be divided accordingly between each trunk fund. Trunk area storm sewer assessments are being levied under Project 302 which will be sufficient to cover the proposed trunk storm sewer extension to the East of T.H. 149. Section 1 (Old Dayton Hudson property) has already been assessed for trunk sanitary sewer previously by agreement. Page 4. /44 7805a 0 PART I - SANITARY SEWER n U APPENDIX A COST ESTIMATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 UTILITY REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 353 300 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Cl. 5 @ $40.00/lin.ft. $ 12,000 1 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/casting (MH -101) @ $2,400.00/ea. 2,400 1 Each Connect 18" RCP to ex. MH @ $500.00/each. 500 1 Each Adjust sanitary sewer manhole @ S200.00/each 200 100 Ton Rock stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 600 TOTAL $ 15,700 +12i Legal, Engineering & Administrative 1,890 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $ 17,590 PART II - WATER MAIN 60 Lin.ft. 20" DIP Cl. 51 in pl. @ S30.00/lin.ft. $ 1,800 150 Lin.ft. 12" DIP Cl. 51 in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 3,300 1,630 Lin.ft. 8" DIP Cl. 52 in pl.,,@ $15.00/lin.ft. 24,450 20 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Cl. 52 in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft. 280 120 Lin.ft. 12" DIP Cl. 52 w/18" steel casing @ $80.00/lin.ft. 9,600 1100 Lin.ft. 8" DIP Cl. 52 w/14" steel casing @ S60.00/lin.ft. 6,000 300 Lin.ft. 24" steel casing @ $30.00/lin.ft. 9,000 1 Each 20" butterfly valve & box @ $2,200.00/each 2,200 1 Each 12" butterfly valve & box @ $1,200.00/each 1,200 1 Each 8" Resilient wedge G.V. & box @ $400.00/each 400 7805a Page 5. /4S 7805a Page 6. / 7A7 0 0 PART II — WATER MAIN ......Cont'd. 2 Each 6" Resilient wedge G.V. & box @ $350.00/each 700 1 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each 900 2,600 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.00/lb. 2,600 65 Sq.Yds. Insulate water main @ $20.00/sq.yd. 1,300 1,500 Lin.ft. Salvage 8" CIP @ $4.00/lin.ft. 6,000 100 Lin.ft. Salvage steel casing from 8" CIP Sta.144+00@ $10/1.f. 1,000 3 Each Salvage and install existing hydrant @ $700.00/each 2,100 1 Each Salvage and install 8" G.V. and box @ S500.00/each 500 1 Each Connect 8"x12" increaser to 8" G.V. & box @ $400/ea. 400 4 Each Connect 8" DIP to ex. 8" CIP @ $400.00/each 1,600 1 Each Connect 8" DIP to ex. 20"x8" tee @ $400.00/each 400 1 Each Connect 8" DIP to ex. 8"x8" tee @ 5400.00/each 400 1 Each Plug & block ex. 8"x8" tee @ $500.00/each 500 1 Each Connect 1" copper to 8" DIP @ $300.00/each 300 50 Ton Rock Stabilization below pipe @ $6.00/ton 300 TOTAL $77,230 +12% Legal, Engineering & Administrative 9,270 TOTAL WATER MAIN .................................. $86,500 7805a Page 6. / 7A7 0 0 PART III - STORM SEWER M.H. 7.6 to M.H. 27 1 Each Casting Assemblies @ $250.00/each $ 250 8.5 Lin.ft. M.H. 4019-96" @ S500.00/lin.ft. 4,250 3.6 Lin.ft. M.H. A or F @ $140.00/lin.ft. 504 4 Each 30" L.R. Bends Cl. IV @ $250.00/each 1,000 178 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. III (3006) @ $41.20/lin.ft. 7,333 200 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. IV (3006) @ 946.05/lin.ft. 9,210 100 Lin.ft. Trenching 8-10 @ $9.50/lin.ft. 950 150 Lin.ft. Trenching 10-12 @ $13.50/lin.ft. 2,025 144 Lin.ft. Trenching 12 @ $16.00/lin.ft. 2,304 +12% Legal, Engineering 6 Administrative TOTAL 527,826 TOTAL M.H. 27-28 .................................. +12% Legal, Engineering 6 Administrative 3,344 TOTAL M.H. 26-27 .................................... $31,170 M.H. 27 to M.H. 28 2 Each Casting Assemblies @ $250.00/each $ 500 24.7 Lin.ft. M.H. A or F @ $140.00/lin.ft. 3,458 220 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. III (3006) @ $41.20/lin.ft. 9,064 180 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. II (3006) @ $36.00/lin.ft. 6,480 140 Lin.ft. Trenching 8-10 @ $9.50/lin.ft. 1,330 120 Lin.ft. Trenching 8-12 @ $11.50/lin.ft. 1,380 140 Lin.ft. Trenching 10-12 @ $13.50/lin.ft. 1,890 TOTAL $24,102 +12% Legal, Engineering 6 Administrative 2,888 TOTAL M.H. 27-28 .................................. $26,990 Page 7. 7805a /4-% 0 0 M.H. 28 to M.H. 29 -1 Each Casting Assemblies @ $250.00/each $ 250 17.6 Lin.ft. M.H. A or F @ S140.00/lin.ft. 2,464 200 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. III (3006) @ $41.20/lin.ft. 8,240 . 200 Lin.ft. 30" R.C. Cl. IV (3006) @ S46.05/lin.ft. 9,210 50 Lin.ft. Trenching 9-11 @ $11.00/lin.ft. 550 70 Lin.ft. Trenching 9-12 @$12.00/lin.ft. 840 50 Lin.ft. Trenching 11-12 @ $13.00/lin.ft. 650 80 Lin.ft. Trenching 12 @ $16.00/lin.ft. 1,280 50 Lin.ft. Trenching 12-14 @ 518.50/lin.ft. - 925 100 Lin.ft,. Trenching 14-17 @ S22.00/lin.ft. 2,200 TOTAL $26,609 +12% Legal, Engineering, Administrative 3,191 TOTAL M.H. 28-29 ................................. $29,810 TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................. $87,970 PART IV - SIGNALS A. Signal at Co.Rd. 26 6 T.H. 55 $80,000 + 12% Legal, Engineering, Admin. 9,600 Total $89,600 B. Interconnect System $30,000 + 12% Legal, Engineering, Admin. 3,600 Total $33,600 7805a Page 8. /4-1 0 0 APPENDIX 8 COST SEPARATION TRUNK HIGHWAY 55 UTILITY REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 353 I. STORM SEVER M.H. 29 to M.H. 28 Mn/DOT Eagan Total Fagan Peak Flow 25.7 c.f.s. 100% $31,170 Mn/DOT Peak Flow 0.0 c.f.s. 0% -- 25.7 c.f.s. $31,170 M.A. 28 to M.H. 27 Mn/DOT Eagan Total Eagan Peak Flow 25.7 c.f.s. 79.8% S21,530 Mn/DOT Peak Flow 6.5 c.f.s. 20.2% 5,460 32.7 c.f.s. $26,990 M.H. 27 to M.H. 26 fin/DOT Eagan Total Fagan Peak Flow 25.7 c.f.a. 79.8% $23,790 Mn/DOT Peak Flow 6.5 c.f.s. 20.2% 6,020 32.2 c.f.s. 929,810 STORM SEWER SUMMARY Eagan $76,490 Mn/DOT 11,480 TOTAL ....$87,970 Page 9. 7805a / +9 TI. SIGNALS A. Signal (Co, Rd. 26 & T.H. 55) 75% Federal $67,200 12.-1/2% State 11,200 6-1/4% Dakota County 5,600 6-1/4% City of Eagan 5,600 TOTAL $89,600 B. Interconnect System Total Split 75% Federal $25,200 25% Non -Federal 8,400 Total. $33,600 Non -Federal Split State - 8 legs $ 6,720 County - 1 leg 840 City - 1 leg 840 TOTAL - 10 legs S 8,400 SIGNAL SUMMARY Federal State County City Total Signal Co.Rd. 26, T.H. 55 $67,7.00 511,200 $5,600 $5, 600 S 89,600 Interconnect System 25,200 6,720 840 840 33,600 TOTAL S92,400 $17,920 $6,440 $6,440 S123,200 Page 10. 7805a 1 g'0 Q �GAj RELOCATE HYD, RELOCATE Q3LWNNECT DIP TB"EX. DIPCIP WATER MAIN v _,� _ --- _!CONNECT DIPWATER MAIN �2" DIP WATER MAIN 2"lCir OIP TO E%. LIP v� T.H. 55 G' 'it CONNECT DIP TO EX. CIP i i i i i 130" MNP9 • MH -26 30" MH•2730" MH -2B 1\ COST SHA R/N6 STORM SEWER � a /B •,0 F` Cp '44RY i r� SfkfR PG T.H. 55 UTILITY REVISION PROJECT 353 • F T t, ,s Oip k SCALE 1 200 ss 4TfN ~4jN� CONNECT DIP TO E%. CIP b Q• V / RELOCATE G.V. B BOX ^� RELOCATE HYD. FILE NO. 49249 �y { F A� rt Aa _ _ BM STRK YOSEK, ANDFAIIII i ASSM LMC. :mob a—B"DIP WATER MAINy� /\� X20"DIP WATER MAIN /�1 t`W.1 T' S / Q �GAj RELOCATE HYD, RELOCATE Q3LWNNECT DIP TB"EX. DIPCIP WATER MAIN v _,� _ --- _!CONNECT DIPWATER MAIN �2" DIP WATER MAIN 2"lCir OIP TO E%. LIP v� T.H. 55 G' 'it CONNECT DIP TO EX. CIP i i i i i 130" MNP9 • MH -26 30" MH•2730" MH -2B 1\ COST SHA R/N6 STORM SEWER � a /B •,0 F` Cp '44RY i r� SfkfR PG T.H. 55 UTILITY REVISION PROJECT 353 • F T t, ,s Oip k SCALE 1 200 ss 4TfN ~4jN� CONNECT DIP TO E%. CIP b Q• V / RELOCATE G.V. B BOX ^� RELOCATE HYD. FILE NO. 49249 �y { F A� rt Aa _ _ BM STRK YOSEK, ANDFAIIII i ASSM LMC. :mob a—B"DIP WATER MAINy� /\� X20"DIP WATER MAIN /�1 0 0 Agenda Information Memo January 15, 1982 Page Eighteen ADDITIONALwlTEMS!r PUBLIC WORKS SALARY SCHEDULE A. Public Works Supervisory Salary Schedule for 1982 -- The City Administrator and Director of Public Works have completed the re- organization of the Public Works maintenance division. The re- organization was followed through as reviewed and directed by the City Council. The City Administrator asked the Director of Public Works to prepare a memorandum for file on the reorganization, a copy of which is enclosed on pages ISS through /55' for your reference. Included in this memoran u� a copy oF an organiza- tional table and salary recommendations that the City Administrator and Director of Public Works are requesting for these positions. Each of the personnel listed in the report have been contacted by the Director of Public Works so they are aware of the reorganiza- tion proposed for City Council ratification. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the re- organization of the Public Works maintenance division as recommended by the Director of Public Works and City Administrator. _tAomm ity drain stratCr a IS'Z 0 MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JANUARY 15, 1982 SUBJECT: REORGANIZATION OF PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE DIVISION -- SALARY COMPENSATION Attached to this report is a proposed new organizational structure that will be implemented effective January 16, 1982. As can be seen from this new organization structure, the position of foremen has been eliminated and a new job title of Assistant Superintendent (Utilities and Buildings) has been designated. This new superin- tendent position is proposed to be filled by Joe Connolly, present utility foreman. Mr. Bob Shockley, street department foreman, has been informed of the elimination of his position with a sixty day notification to become effective March 15, 1982. It has been proposed to continue Mr. Shockley at his present 1981 salary until March 15. At that time, if Mr. Shockley has expressed a desire to continue employment with the City, the City will make a deter- mination pertaining to retaining his services as a street main- tenance employee with a rate of pay equivalent to the standard union contract in effect at that time. Because Mr. Connolly will be assuming additional responsibilities associated with his new position, it is recommended that his base salary be increased by $170 prior to a 9% increase for 1982. Because Bill Branch will be sharing some of his administrative responsibilities with Joe Connolly under this new organization, an 8% increase is recommended in determining his 1982 salary. The following table illustrates the financial impact of this reorganization based on the following assumptions for .•comparative purposes: If no reorganization took place and the status quo was con- tinued in 1982, it was assumed that all personnel would receive a 9% increase. 2. Since the new union contract has not been resolved as of this date, the 1982 salary for a maintenance employee was based on the assumption that the present Level II, Step C rate of pay was increased by 9%. 3. The increase to the base rate of pay for Jim McGuffee, park foreman, would not be applied without this reorganization. Under the proposed reorganization, it is assumed that a $45 per month increase would be added to the base rate of pay before a 9% increase was applied. /S3 Reorganization Memo January 15, 1982 Page Two STATUS QUO ORGANIZATION FOR -1982 Public Works Supt. $2190/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos = $28,645.20 Utilities Foreman 1852/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos = 24,224.16 Park Foreman 1852/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos = 24,224.16 Street Foreman 1852/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos = 243224.16 1982 X101,317.68 PROPOSED REORGANIZATION FOR -1982 Supt -of Streets & Eqpt. $2190/mo + 0 x 1.08 x 12 mos. _ $28,382.40 Supt of Utilities & Bldgs. 1852/mo + $170/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos. = 26,447.76 Park Foreman 1852/mo + $ 45/mo x 1.09 x 12 mos. = 24,812.76 Street Maint. Employee $8.87/hr. x 1.09 x 2080 hrs. = 20,110.64 TOTAL 1982 = $99,752.98 Cost Savings: $1,564.70 = 108 brs. O.T. Maint. Employee As can be seen, a cost savings would occur up to the point that the new street maintenance employee (previous street foreman) earned 108 hours of overtime. Based on these facts, it can be shown that this new organization proposal will not create a financial impact to the City of Eagan. Therefore, it is the Public Works Director's request that this reorganization and salary schedule be presented to the Council at the January 19, 1982 Council meeting for formal approval retroactive to January 1, 1982. Please inform me if additional information or justification is necessary to present this information to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works 154 Pv�t- kc 0 P pE PT �Q0.oPoseq� P tL�cToGL yz Sac SUPT %x S ee-Y �ssr Su pT. Srttarrs, C'QPr SANrrArLY $ro2M + WASTER. 1 7 Mn,Kr Pe LSOfINQl I I G M AINr PemsoNAeek. I 9 • 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 15, 1982 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE Comprehensive Guide Plan Review The City of Eagan has reviewed the preliminary draft of the Metro- politan Council's review report on Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. There are some minor issues which the City had to address prior to final staff review. These issues have been addressed by the City Planner. A copy of his letter and response to the Metropolitan Council is enclosed on pages Kcj through 60 . In speaking with the Metropolitan staff, t e?e are no apparent problems with any of the issues; it was more a matter of clarifica- tion on the part of the City. Mr. John Voss, the City's planning consultant, has worked with Mr. Runkle, reviewing these comprehen- sive guide plan changes. Rauenhorst Gravel Permit Renewal The City Administrator has carried out the direction of the City Council regarding the gravel permit renewal for Rauenhorst. Chief Building Inspector Peterson has met with Mr. Ted Jirick of Rauen- horst, who is the Director of Mining, Excavating and Grading, to discuss the City's concerns. He has assured the City that any excavating that takes place will be left in a condition that com- plies with City ordinances and OSHA requirements. The Director of Public Works has contacted MnDOT requesting information on (1) the status of right-of-way acquisition of I -35E; (2) the proposed future elevations of I -35E; and (3) any additional information pertaining to anticipated excess or burrow material resulting from construction of this highway through Section 10. The concerns addressed by the City Council are being 'reviewed by City staff. House File #1505 Mayor Blomquist and City Administrator Hedges learned at a recent Mayor & Manager Breakfast that Representative Carolyn Rodriguez is a co-author of House File #1505 which is a "Bill for an Act RElating to Metropolitan Government: Providing for the Establish- ment and Operation of a Water Planning and Management Program in the Metropolitan Area, Requiring Watershed and Local Water Manage- ment Plans, Establishing a Metropolitan Water Resources Advisory Board, Providing for the Establishment and Operation of Watershed Management Organizations, Establishing a Program of Planning and Capital Improvement Grants, Authorizing County and Metropolitan Debt, Authorizing Taxes". Apparently, Representative Rodriguez 156 0 0 Informative Memo January 15, 1982 Page Two co-authored the bill so she could be assured that the Metropolitan Council would not receive the regulatory authority over watershed which would merely expand their current bureaucracy. Enclosed on page /61 is a copy of a letter from Representative Rodriguez that explains er reasons for co-authoring House File 1505. State Aid Deferred Payments The City of Eagan has received an I.O.U. from the Minnesota Depart- ment of Revenue regarding deferred payments of state aid. The amount certified to the City in deferred aids for 1981 is $236,580.10. This is slihtly less than the amount projected by our Director of Finance; 239,258.38. The difference appears to be in homestead tax credit and not in local government aid. Height Limitation Analysis The subcommittee reviewing height limitations met on January 11, 1982. After considerable discussion on different approaches on regulating height limitations, as presented by the City Planner, the City staff was directed to collect additional data and prepare some regulatory models for consideration at the next meeting. That meeting is tentatively scheduled for January 25, 1982. A recommendation from that committee will be made to the Advisory Planning Commission followed by a recommendation of the APC to the City Council at a later date. Tax Exempt Mortgage Financing Update Enclosed on pages _ /6 Z through _J63 is a copy of the most recent update for the tax exempt mortgage inaancing program. Miscellaneous Legal Actions Status Report Enclosed is an update of the legal actions that are pending or have been resolved concerning the City of Eagan (pages 16!f through 10 )• Miscellaneous Correspondence Oftentimes, action is taken at a City Council meeting to direct the City Administrator to write letters of correspondence regarding certain issues as a result of formal or informal City Council actions. Historically, the City Administrator has written these letters; however, copies are often not given to the City Council. Beginning with this Council packet, any correspondence directed by the City Council to the City Administrator at a City Council meeting will be copied as informational business with the next City Council packet. At the January 5, 1982 meeting, letters were 157 • Informative Memo January 15, 1982 Page Three directed as follows: C� 1. Cable Television/Joint Powers Agreement City of Burnsville 2. Letter of Appreciation to the Dakota County Board of Commis- sioners regarding the 911 telephone service 3. Letter to the Dakota County Plat Committee regarding Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition (Special Note: This will be placed on the February 2, 1982 agenda) 4. Letter to the history committee 5. Letter to the Dakota County Board regarding the Lake Byllesby Dam issue These letters are enclosed on pages 16% through 175" for your information. Firemen's Relief Pension Fund The City Administrator has set a second meeting with Mr. Gus Welter, secretary of the Minnesota State Fire Department Association, and Roger Katzenmaier, the City's auditor, on Thursday, January 21, 1982, to discuss in further detail the proposals concerning an increase and/or different method of retirement pension fund for the volunteer fire fighters. The City Administrator will keep the City Council briefed on that meeting. `Cko,a 14O)M_ City Administrat r 1S�9 BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMASEGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS January 12, 1982 BARBARA L SENNESS PRINCIPAL REVIEWER METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 300 METRO SQUARE BLDG ST PAUL MN 55101 Re: Dear Ms. Senness: rIL 0 CITY OF EAGAN ;�;•�]T93 PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN,MINNESOTA•' ssu: PHONE 454-6100 - i•`l Council Staff THOMASHEDGES CITY AOMINISTRAIOR EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE CITY CLERK The City of Eagan has reviewed the preliminary draft of the Council's review report on Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. It is the City's understanding that there are some minor issues which the City has to address prior to the final staff review being complete on January 13, 1982. These issues are addressed in the preliminary draft of the Council's review report on Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. The following items will state the issue first and Eagan's response to the issue in the remainder of this letter. ISSUE - The plan oonfo= to Metropolitan system plans as follows with the exception of the classification of Cliff Road. CaNVE'NT - It is the City's understanding that the Metropolitan Council is presently revising its systems' plan for transportation, and it is the City's understanding that the Council is proposing to modify the transportation plan which would then be consistent with Eagan's Comprehensive Gide Plan. Therefore, at the present time, Eagan is not proposing to amend or change the classification of Cliff Road, County Road 32, from a minor to an intermediate arterial. It is also the City's understanding that the Metropolitan Council's staff will be addressing this item to the Physical Development Committee and the Metropolitan Council. ISSUE - Eagan should amend the projected 1990 Inver Grove Heights flow through Eagan to 0.08 MGD to be consistent with the Inver Grove Heights plan. COMMENT - Eagan has reviewed the flow projections from Inver Grove Heights which would feed into Eagan's sanitary sewer system. The City of Eagan only wants to provide the capacity needed to service Inver Grove Heights. Therefore, the City of Eagan has no objections in revising its .168 M® for 1990 to reflect the 0.08 MGD projected by Inver Grove Heights. Thus, revision will be completed prior to the City of Eagan adopting Eagan's Comprehensive Guide Plan. ISSUE - The plan should make specific reference to 14 MCM 1.3010 concerning MnDOT's regulations and land use safety zones A, B and C. C3`oM]T - Sub -paragraph I in Section IV -23 of Fagan's Comprehensive Gide Plan as amended will be redrafted to exclude the portion which "states if they are located within the A or B Zone related to air navigation at Minneapolis-St.Paul International is9 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. 0 0 Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Guide Plan January 12, 1982 Page two Airport". The revised paragraph will read as follows: "Fagan will consider the following objects as general obstructions to air navigation." ISSUE - The City should include in its Capital Improvements Program a schedule of all projects estimated to cost in excess of $10,000 or a projected five years, the need, estimated cost, funding source and amounts, and the financial inpact that the improvements will have on the City. In addition, the CIP should include a schedule of annual debt service payments on the existing debt and the planned debt until its expiration. COMMfS7'TS-The City use the Capital Improvements Program as an ongoing process. The City will be reviewing the CIP on an annual basis and updating it for the next five years. In this update, the City of Eagan will include all of the cwnrents listed in the above paragraph. Once the City has updated its CIP for the next five-year segment, the City will forward a copy to the Metropolitan Council for their review. ISSUE - According to Minnesota Statute 473.811, Subd. 5, Eagan should adopt an appropriate ordinance, or reference a County ordinance, governing solid waste collection and disposal in the City. Presently, the City of Eagan does have an ordinance entitled Rubbish Collection Ordinance No. 34 which references Minn- esota Statutes Section 368.01 and 412.221 which is in effect in the City of Eagan at the present time. This ordinance presently requires the licensing of opera- tor's within the City. The City is also in the process of codifying all of the ordinances presently adopted by the City. During this codification, the City will look at Minnesota Statutes 473.811, Subd. 5 to update its present ordinance to be consistent with the Minnesota State Statute. It is the City's understanding that the issues and comments which have been listed in this letter will be adequate to fulfill the review process by the Metropolitan Council. If you need further information, or there are additional items to be addressed for the review process, please contact me at the Eagan City Hall. $incerely, 9 -- Dale C. ale City Planner cc - Thomas"' "Hedges,�yCity"Ad7ministrator John Voss, Consultant Planner 160 • Carolyn D. Rodriguez District 53A Dakota County Committees: Education Local and Urban Affairs Transportation Commerce and Economic Development Mr. Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RE: House File No. 1505 Dear Mr. Hedges: Itinnesota _q House of Representatives i Harry A. Sleben, Jr., Speaker January 11, 1982 As co-author of the Levi bill, I am primarily interested in two things. They are: 1) ...making certain that major water shed problems do not go unresolved through the refusal of a locality to deal with it to the detriment of another locality. 2) ...making certain that as much local control as possible is maintained and that the Metropolitan Council receives no additional powers to deal with this area. From their testimony, I gather that they are very interested in gaining this control. I would welcome the opportunity to talk with you or anyone else as to how to best achieve these goals. House File No. 1505 will have to be amended and I hope you will make any suggestions you consider opportune. CDR/dn /6 Sincerely, 64A,4 Carolyn D. Rodriguez % \ L Reply to: El172 State Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 OlfIce: (612) 2968832 IG F1 14215 Drexel Ct.. Annie VAIIeV MlnnncMA 55194 Hnmo IA191 A91.1Sd9 "' U 1PG: January 5, 19 Tptal TnK)unt of Pre-Cannitted loans Pe:'centage of IganS Pre -Cbrmlitted Total. Nl➢1'd�C3r of Loans Average Mor.t-yayc Amount Av!xage Sale Price Average Tq:)praisal Value Average Adjusted Gross Income Average Gross Incom Type of Loan: Insured Conventional. Uninsured Conventional FHA VA Graduated Pledge Averare loan to Value Ratio: Insured Conventional Uninsured Conventional Nud:er of New Construction to uls NLDW.)01- of L'xisL-ing ]lams ']jgla of D-ell.ing: Single Pamdly Townhouse Condominium Mobile HaTes Average Previous Residents Number of Renters Number of Owners Average Age Sex: Male Female Average raimi.ly Size Average Number of Children Marital Status: Married Si.nulc Joint Divorced I'l1lJD:17JG: ' 1)01" Ivrount of UJans Punci lel NCufi1X9: OL t/k711S E CiIY OF ]iAGAN SCati.stica]. DaL;1-- "COU1IL of Prcrlrmi $16,940,000 99 % ]nw incanc fasic .Incrame 153 141 $52,682 $ 61,310 -8.,9-46 —6b- Z12 59.405 _ 67,842 _20,174 24,976 _ 21,460 26,632 20 69 28 65 88% 90% --- 73%_-- --- ... _ 74% --- -- 120 107 ---...--- —34 — 33 76 _ 95 23 30 _ 94 16 — 0 0 18$— 22%_ 111 102 42 _ 39 _ 30.3— ---29.6 104 _ 128 49 — 13 1.8 _ 2.4 - — - 4 — --- —.. 7 — — 65 -- 93 -- ---79---_ � 28 .5 ------14 -- 16,391,750 288 /6 Z - DATE: January 5, 1982 CITY OF EAGAN 516,940,000 --Amount of Program Dollar Amount of Funds Remaining $31,825,00 PLEASE NOTE: This amount can be utilized in any of the following categories: Single Family, Townhouse, Condo, Mobile Home; Low or Basic Incomes; or any Conventional Loans, including Conventional 950,. This does not include the Graduated Pledge Account. At this time, there are no Graduated Pledge Funds available. Total Pre-Conunitment Amount 516,705,025 Total Reserved (Yet to be Pre-Conmitted) S 203,150 $16,940,00 /6 3 0 • PAUL H. HAUGE & ASSOCIATES, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA 58122 PAUL N. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3795 Pilot Knob Road Pagan, MN 55122 January 11, 1982 Re: Miscellaneous Legal Actions -- Status Report Dear Tom: AREA CODE 812 TELEPHONE 454.4224 The following is a report covering legal actions brought for or against the City during the past year for the Council's information: 1. NuWay Builders and Sidney Johnson v. City of Fagan Willmus Properties,etc. This case was appealed to the Supreme Court by NuWay Builders and by Willmus Properties and there have been many delays by NuWay Builders and by supplying the transcript of the eight' days of trial at the District Court level to the Supreme Court. The transcript was due in January and we have just received notice that NuWay has dismissed its appeal because it did not complete its transcript. 2. Aghassi v. City of Fagan. A motion was brought in January to reopen the decision of Judge Lenertz who dismissed the Aghassi petition to force the Council to deliver the off -sale liquor license in Silver Bell Center. Judge Lenertz refused to reopen the case and Aghassi did not appeal. 3. Caponi v. Carlson, City of Eagan, Bonestroo, Rosene, etc. Originally there was an action brought for $60,000 in damages by Caponi against the parties mentioned above including developers and contractors. That action is pending in Dakota County District Court and on December 16 the Commissioner of Natural Resources issued his decision concerning the lake level setting. He followed the guidelines of the Hearing Examiner except that he added that the permit for the outlet to the lake is necessary to be acquired through DNR and will be issued only if the City, the developers, and other interested parties including property owners around the lake acquire easement rights from Mr. Caponi. This may require a third action for condemnation if settle- ment cannot be reached. At the present time Mr. Caponi has received appraisals from Dick Parranto for his damages including $65,000 for the taking along the east and north ends of the lake and $35,000 for cutting off the small point of land at the southwest corner. We have made an offer of settlement of approxi- mately $30,000 which, to this point, has been rejected. This money would come from the property owners on the west side, Rosene, Carlson and Tilsen and Home Insurance Company for the City of Fagan. /6,q- Mr. Hedges • January 11, 1982 Page Two 4. Taylor v. Smith, Parranto and Egan. I have heard nothing transpiring in the action for approximately four to five months. 5. City of Eagan v. Dennis McCarthy -- Wescott Road. The commissioners issued their award on November 3,•1981, for $165,000 including $21,000 for the CPA transmission line and that has now been appealed. The McCarthys have sued for trespass damages in the sum of $275,000 and motions were heard by Judge Kluck on December 16 relating to the trespass action and the acquisition of necessary easements. No decision has been made at the present time on the motions. 6. City of Eagan v. Dennis McCarthy -- Pond Easements. The condemnation action for the pond easement was started in mid -1981 and the short 100=foot piece of storm sewer pipe leading from St. Francis Wood southerly into the ponds was constructed in September. The hearing on the granting of the petitioner for condemnation was heard on December 16 and the Order has not been received granting the condemnation as yet. The trespass action also involves the acquisition of the pond easements. 7. City of Eagan v. Ross Kramer and Cy Barry. This condemnation action was settled with Mr. and Mrs. Ross Kramer for the payment of 813,800 covering the storm sewer outlet from Blackhawk Lake. It is my understanding that construction is nearly complete. The action against Mr. and Mrs. Cy Barry has been dismissed. 8. City of Eagan v. Chapdelaine -- Two Condemnation Actions. Both of these condemnation actions for storm sewer outlet from Bur Oak Pond have been settled, one for $1,500 and the other for $20,000. 9. Thomas Lake Trunk Storm Sewer Appeal. Judge Martin Mansur decided upon motion of the property owners to remand the assessment hearing back to the Council and the first reassessment hearing was held on December 1, 1981. Of 87 property owners, 50 filed objections and the reassessment hearings are now scheduled for January 12, 1982. 10. Trudi Johnson v. City of Eagan -- Assessment Appeal, Dodd Road. The hearing on the assessment appeal covering Dodd Road street improvements, sani- tary sewer and water, was held on December 17. The assessments were $32,000 and the appraiser for the property owner indicated a benefit of $11,200. No decision has been made. 11. Pilot Knob Properties Assessment Appeal -- Drexel Heights Addition. This case was tried before the District Court for three days in October and November of 1981 and briefs have been submitted but no decision has been reached by the Courts at the present time. The assessments were $4,400 per lot for 24 lots and the property owner has admitted to $2,750 in benefit per lot. 12. Dakota County -- Galaxie Road Assessment Appeal. No further proceedings have taken place concerning the assessment appeal. 13. Miscellaneous Assessment Appeals. The City has received about twelve assessment appeals from the September 1980 assessment hearings and they have all been disposed of or settled with the exception of those that are mentioned above. These include some of the more important ones: /6 S Mr. Hedges • January 11, 1982 • Page Three A. Heidi Scheila -- Dodd Road. This case was settled for a total of $3,900 including the acquisition,of necessary right-of-way and claimed damages due to the faulty construction of Dodd Road adjacent to the Scheila property. B. Assessment Appeals by Lexington South and Blackhawk Park. These have been settled by respreading assessments over a larger area of property within each of the planned developments. C. Twin View Manor Assessment Appeal. The Council will remember that an action to enjoin the City from constructing the utility and street improvements in Twin View Manor was commenced approximately a year ago but was dismissed a day prior to commencement of trial. A number of Twin View Manor residents have appealed the assessments and negotiations are taking place for settlement. 14. R.L. Johnson -- Alexander Road Assessment Appeal. The assessments were estimated to be $51,000 in 1978 and the total assessments levied were $185,000. The assessments were appealed and in order to avoid procedural issues the Council has now rescheduled the assessment hearing for February 5, 1982. In the interim we are attempting to settle the appeal. The property owner has requested a 20 -year assessment spread and the City initially spread the assessments over five years. 15. Thomas Ocel v. City of Eagan. The water damage to the Ocel property -on Ches Mar Drive is being handled by the Fagan insurance carrier, Home Insurance Company. Settlement attempts have taken place but have not been completed. 16. Mark Dunn and Bart Dunn Assessment Appeal -- Overview Estates. Although the assessments were appealed, the Dunns are not pursuing the action at the present time. 17. Thomas Lake Road Assessment Appeal -- Scherer, Barker and Smith. These were settled by dismissing the assessments during 1981. 18. Farmington Development, Inc. v. Adelmann and City of Eagan. The City has entered an answer denying any liability to Farmington Development for the assessments paid for Lot 4, Block 2, Cedar Industrial Park. We will be bringing a motion for summary judgment in the City's favor in the near future. 19. Spencer v. City of Fagan, Barton Contracting, and Road Machinery and Supplies Company. Home Insurance Company has accepted defense of the lawsuit by the Spencers against the City, and our office will be handling their assessment appeal if they pursue it. 20. Freeway Ford vs. Larsen, Reiter, and City of Fagan. Home Insurance Company is handling the defense of this matter on behalf of the City. /W/(Z/ Mr. Hedges January 11, 1982 Page Four 21. Prosecution. Our office took over the prosecution of misdemeanor cases for the City in late spring and this was first handled by Rich Krambeer. In early July, Kevin Ride began to handle the prosecution work with some assistance from Dave Keller. Also, in mid-July the Dakota County District Court adopted a trial policy of having the prosecutors for the various municipalities working out of the Burnsville County Court attend arraignment hearings each Wednesday afternoon for approximately three hours. It was the hope of the District Court that if additional cases were settled at this time, the attorneys for the cities would make up this additional time by reduced trial case loads. There has not been a significant reduction in the case loads, however, there have been cost savings to the County in reduced public defender expenditures and per- haps savings to the City in reduced appearances by the police officers. It is estimated by our office that 645 new prosecution files were opened and pursued in 1981, resulting in the expenditure of approximately 370 hours of attorney time, for the last six months of 1981 only. 22. Ess Brothers v. Erickson Construction Company, Balboa Insurance Company, and City of Eagan. This is an action by a subcontractor against the contractor and bonding company and City of Fagan in regard to Project 1180-7. The bond company is defending the City of Eagan which is involved only because a portion of the material supplied by the subcontractor was supplied prior to the date of the contract and bond. The amount of this claim is something over 9500 and does not appear to be a valid claim against the City. 23. Valley Blacktopping v. Erickson, Balboa, City of Eagan. Again, this is Project 1180-7 for a claim similar to Ess Brothers. It appears that Balboa Insurance has reached a,settlement with the Plaintiff Valley Blacktopping. 24. Lyman Lumber Company v. Coachman Oaks Company, Eagan, et al. A sub- contractor has brought an action against the contractor which built apartment buildings with IDR funding through the City of Eagan. It appears that the City was named as a matter of course and does not have exposure in that area in that IDR funding does not result in an interest in the property by the City nor any guarantees by the City. The developer's attorney has agreed to defend the City if necessary. The amount of the claim is $61,000. 25. Eagan v. G & L Sealcoating. This is an action as a result of the contractor's failure to complete the 1980 sealcoating project 1180-18. Settle- ment has been reached with the bonding company which provided the bond for the contractor prior to commencing an action. The bond company has agreed to pay $48,913.90. The foregoing are essentially the actions in which the City was involved in 1981, many of which are now disposed of. If there are specific questions, please call. Very ty41y yours, - Paul H. Hauge skk 167 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL & CABLE TELEVISION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 13, 1982 SUBJECT: LETTER FROM MAYOR BLOMQUIST TO MAYOR SCHEUNEMANN REGARDING It CONSIDERATION FOR A JOINT CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE FOR THE CITY OF BURNSVILLE" Enclosed is a copy of a letter that was sent from Mayor Blomquist to Mayor Scheunemann entitled, "Consideration for a Joint Cable Television Franchise with the City of Burnsville". I thought each committee member would enjoy having a copy of this letter; and if you are able to attend the meeting scheduled for January 20, 1982 at which time the Cable Television Advisory Committee for the City of Burnsville will make a presentation to the Burnsville City Council, please notify this office. The time of that meeting is 7:00 p.m. 1 \� ity Administrator cc: Tom Creighton, Legal Consultant Rich Anthony, Technical Consultant 1 16 1 BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMASEOAN JAMES A, SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMRERS January 12, 1982 MAYOR PAUL SCHEU MANN BUMSVILLE CITY HALL 1313 E HWY 13 BURNSVILLE PMI 55337 i CITY OF EAGAN •�:x,,3195 PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O. BOK 21199 .. EAGAN, MINNESOTA `I 55121 ry PHONE 4$4-8100 , 1 THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMIIIISIRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLERK Re: Consideration for a Joint Cable Television Franchise with the City of Burnsville Dear Paul: Our City Council and appointed Cable Television Advisory Committee have studied the feasibility of providing cable television to our cmminity for the past several months. A needs assessment was conducted last year followed by a detailed study of ownership options that are available to our municipality. The last two (2) meet- ings, the Comrrittee jointly with our City Council, has discussed the joint powers option. Since the City of Eagan was included in a cable service territory with seven (7) other communities at the request of the City of South St. Paul in Septem- ber of 1980, that option was studied in detail. The other alternative viewed by the City of Eagan was to franchise with the City of Burnsville, also studied in detail. At our last Cable Television Advisory Committee Meeting held on Thursday, January 7, 1982, it was a unanimous decision of the Committee, including zrenlbers of the City Council, that the City of Eagan narrow the joint franchising options to the City of Burnsville. The ConmitL.ee and members of the City Council feel that the City of Eagan and the City of Burnsville have a great deal in cacmon as it relates to current and future demographics. The City Council will formally consider this re=arendation by the Advisory Committee at their next Council meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 19, 1982. However, since the entire City Council serves as a part of the Cable Television Advisory Committee, and everyone was present but my- self, I was ill that evening, it is certain that the recommrendation will become a mere formality as a City Council practice at the meeting this coming Tuesday. I would like to extend our willingness to serve jointly with your commmity in an effort to franchise a Cable Television system. I feel a strong intergovernrrntal cooperation can prevail as we are willing to share our resources, data collection and any other information that would be helpful for the City of Burnsville as you approach decisions relating to Cable Television. The Cable Television Advisory Committee has made a commitment to move ahead with the franchising process in the next few months so construction can begin in 1982 making cable television avail- able to our residents this year. Our consultants have assured us that this time frame would be possible if the City of Burnsville wishes to franchise jointly with the City of Eagan despite the need for you to complete a needs assessment and consider other decisions. The City of Eagan is extending an invitation to your Cable Television Advisory Committee and City Council to attend a joint meet- ing we will sponsor at 7:00 P.M. on Thursday, February 11, 1982 in our City Coun- cil chambers, Our objective with thatmetingmeeting is to discuss the feasibility THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. Mayor Paul Scheufanann January 12, 1982 Joint Cable Television Franchise Page two i of providing a joint franchise between the Cities of Eagan and Burnsville as it relates to cable television. I will be looking forward to a response from you, and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact ne at any time or have your City Manager, Mr. Spore contact our City Administrator, Mr. Thomas Hedges. Sincerely, Beatta Blchquist Mayor, City of Eagan X70 January 6, 1982 v„4 •T .'y� COMMISSIONER JOHN VOSS ` DAKOTA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 WEST HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 . Re: Dakota County Board Action to Fund 911 Network Installation Costs or the ity of Eagan Dear Commissioner Voss: On behalf of the Eagan City Council, I would like to thank you personally and the Dakota County Board of Commissioners for the action that was taken on December 22, 1981 whereas the Dakota County Board of Commissioners accepted the responsibility to fund the 911 network installation costs for -the City of Eagan as well as five (5) other cities in Dakota County. This action was greatly appreciated by our community and the City will participate in a grant agreement with the Dakota County Board of Commis- sioners for funding the 911 installation charge not to exceed $22,367. Again, the integovernmental relationship between our City and Dakota County and the responsibility you have shown in this action is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, rvW.0'-64 Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd cc: Fred Joy, Dakota County Administrator Martin DesLauriers, Chief of Police i -7r THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. BEA OLOMDUIST • MAYOR THOMAS HEDGES ' CITY ADMINISTRATOR THOMAS ELAN CITY OF EAGAN EUGENE N OVERBEKE JAMES A. SMITH City TV LIERY, JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER �'.5295 PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMNERS . P.O. BOK 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 .. PHONE 454-8100 January 6, 1982 v„4 •T .'y� COMMISSIONER JOHN VOSS ` DAKOTA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 WEST HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 . Re: Dakota County Board Action to Fund 911 Network Installation Costs or the ity of Eagan Dear Commissioner Voss: On behalf of the Eagan City Council, I would like to thank you personally and the Dakota County Board of Commissioners for the action that was taken on December 22, 1981 whereas the Dakota County Board of Commissioners accepted the responsibility to fund the 911 network installation costs for -the City of Eagan as well as five (5) other cities in Dakota County. This action was greatly appreciated by our community and the City will participate in a grant agreement with the Dakota County Board of Commis- sioners for funding the 911 installation charge not to exceed $22,367. Again, the integovernmental relationship between our City and Dakota County and the responsibility you have shown in this action is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, rvW.0'-64 Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd cc: Fred Joy, Dakota County Administrator Martin DesLauriers, Chief of Police i -7r THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. BEA BLOMOUIST • MAYOR THOMASEGAN CITY OF EAGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS - THEODORE WACHTER',�.S195 PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMBERS ,' P.O. BOK 11199 EAGAN,MINNESOTA ' 55u: „-+ PHONE 954-8100 January 12, 1982 LLJ DAKOTA COUNTY PLAT COMMITTEE DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 W HWY 55 "'— HASTINGS MN 55033 Re: Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition Preliminary Plat Dear Sirs: THOMAS HEDGES CITY AOMINISIRAZOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLERM In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular City Council meeting held on December 1, 1981, approval was given to the staff and applicant to prepare Cedar Cliff Com- mercial Addition with a cul-de-sac adjacent to Cliff Road and two access points for parking and commercial development off Nicols Road. Please make reference to.the attached drawing entitled "Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition". 'The Eagan City Council has spent considerable time reviewing this parcel of property and feels this proposal is the best method for platting the 'Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition parcel. The residential integrity of Cedar Cliff Third Addition will be least impacted by this drawing. Traffic volumes on Cliff Road and Nicols Road should not affect the three proposed access points to the property (a cul-de-sac on Cliff Road and two entrances from Nicols Road) due to the Cedar Avenue Freeway and I -35E which are both close to this property. Any revisions to the proposed preliminary plat as prepared would be expensive, realising' the topography adjacent to Scott Trail. The City of Eagan would like a formal response from the Dakota County Plat Committee regarding the pro- posed Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition before any further work is performed by the developer. The City of Eagan is planning to discuss this item at the February 2, 1982 City Council meeting, and, therefore, a response prior to that meeting would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Q�� Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd /7 2 cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner; John Voss, Dakota County Commis- sioner; Steven J. FlanaJ�an; Joe Ryan, St. Paul Companies THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENG H AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. I le - n�aen •I o • •.+461.1 •p tt '1 �I41, J+' 'a - 8oe 1•�� Ir. ['- :Vi ri-1ri,m,t�"',fa• zaoo I•fJteo %ee.fl T I �� . p � !' I hl I ! i ��' l - �•JGC 78.eeI . - �.�' g YV' 4 pI' of ;clh ll'-���+•[E.il-780° of •a_ + % I+ .. 61 A l@ .LI Iti L IA >,I 1 9 yBB •.. Iti .71 II �� �• /Erl�� IL i !II \I I` 'II • �•£,�%+• t'; i I Jv-,( `Earn (�rJ�,•�Gv1 ',,p/y��1�, I �,`,` :+•' li II II li I :_?x - ':iRl v' \�k .� b ,ill 'L— V �- �O r a�:134fy'j I 4 + • '4�I II I I II �`1 I /Iwll � 3 �+ $ � }'t �:+.;�---il'b•!i• I + 'J I ro I v _ I • ,Im I � nm [vn 11 '' � I 4 # ? �' S/; ` . ' I _ r )\' i m _aw I �! +, S'+', ♦600/,[1 4 • uw �.,�--` I 0[tj, 1: iht5 i lct'ih�.-p�v,��..�aL��M'�x•- : •r�' �\ ���'rQ $i:'So I.\`. ,re. .[aa,Y„1r•;liir'a�Y✓ �1I �.',4ge11y[SN�� Iq''.n�s±I..'rI2F+^YEIl�P3VIlIriIE:'i71-�.`.[M\F'VI•I `R�/�'.�O`'afI'A7.brvL`+. I �l8 ._ �+7. 8:—" I1 Ij .e.'SS\Am.axY+l�r�• f�6i aw(,y�I IS . ��4A�'i\b^- h +pCr�rrrroRiYs-I ^ I?���:I T Nm ro `�II . �a '�I1, 'djM, y2YP. yt!n/�s/•,°` titl�ayyZ I. ieVits :?Lr�IJyp'x-.F'{^�'�.�r.l ✓'_-v•s.l r•S!r. •.YEb a? •m✓Ie L . II a'_[I I --�'III \ !I i` noo I r !Ii •3�. I` i �;I� t el+J'. \ I ?r .... B 10 }0anm!8 k7_W�,i,r9Inriu-:r I1 [icyI r .(rx• upO y �I- r t �'i ww.._i.� '�as•v*r f .Ii"� '-i a 11'-- 8 Ic . z s 18 s* 2 A, - "� iee>� •v4✓,r � S ea4 I $-Nx'NY� �-Ar::__ -PPa'^ r >• .. B„r,,,,.�ma+ F - _ n •e°mfpw-l'^".x. °' b -WJE z- n IO � � f\` a >s:a^'ac�a a�xt�aXrr-'�'�tsxti'<,CL4FF.H{C'L*.r; �' `. ,;'J a •'b ' 31 .✓/rrz:,a:t 'Ipaaa F �' uop u'A\ 1111? y B 6 1- B c yt y ipl • •n r°-S"•'ye `'' e . I a II- ` i4'+ -.i 1S B $ul 8 8 •a 'Yw x ai +• s _ I D � 811 ]7 - yr '%8 I .1„9 Y 7 1 S�; 6 gam' .� M , M + .}� --L ✓,PY: n' f.ac IrV•( -aera ;w•[ [ n b- L° a R• +. J s _ _ I r • ! IgI1 /t Le Sl,..st::��1 1 � �,;' I I!/r•x+b.w wl srramr [r'ao rav lre q, r[ 7 ,•j '• 10 .aa,. ao , i' t qQ -12 08 r. r, a r>,a :o a'a "v/,t +F p°� 4 4 °•.•tea° J i.iq, ` ,/rrc __ 3AQ �11'yy}'' L /I .eYa.'.l L 1. a + , ab id/5 B ♦ ,\F 4 11 q'4 m• _m—yf�_rfi g-1za S I z s . %r �a • ` n to r{° 1 I. -. �i+-'•1�.'f\�f.� A a �= $ := a r✓,y/+.,lti °o W y, FI -:9! iF R :ti ' an +':' e e • . 'D „b• W Y•,b •aata +^•rq 6 .} a aa' r' q� _ Al ..,0 ' `•.: r•t- i "e'b„I.r Ste, xNp e a 1' + +r°. -0I /',+' 'a4 ,Y a •Aw`A+'�: R'.:..0 ' xer.a N.B 'y* aa..'ASCOT r* y/ tarau so e° ma ^,r.�j• aeo '•F., ib+ �•b > rA Wl-ou.:- - �� i s 'r I `ybs .:;�:+r:�'�,; [� , 9, •+. II •aro�8 •j 1 EQ%4R I �'1 :1 p u r'.'��',�,, ' e � a�:$• jG1.5 [H .�'. 1' • ! e Q.� T1a l >i 1 '' • y$ ,�` � �I 4 , •' [ar 1: R•I. LInw1. +u la-- L 'e�, - O� • � N. .-O+fl..g " "l11((1FF �s-'a,.•` /..a - ; n _ ori d 4 g . 193.oe kI I 1 -.lo � II +`b . � :- .. er ari• 14 0 •' H89Yo'35E �' ,�IH 1 � ? I i� + 9/\ =0 5 aL +8 ••i Zw to .7r ,gym oo __ j{o o ' yjl F• I% {° I 11 '-F.• ♦a ''•. �� ��:,e 1 8 A� m (1 .'tea � I rV 2 I •? r4�i° .'0�++iP ``� ++8 .' ,,�', `'s �s.';�ar. 12 •+a,; .;5�4a,�'.,1 " ,.,��:'.. rP e 1 r° a,se9.10'aew 11W..u L1' IY1M£Q�� CIAL 1�\t)1i .� I � h I �_ Bi .-..•xa � I a. s 1 R '4• l c r t y oil 642 l+l d i - N I l t I I t) a 1-73 'N6•• 4 � ��nsii ra ETA DEPARTMEN—TOFI[PORTATION RIGHT- .. �•�a• a �.�yy4+. ��.�gl ry. 0 K'}AY, PLAT N0.19-10. ;,._ r. • - �.� �, . _.-.-'COUNTY. _, ; STATE r,a,p AID [' ' BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR �4• • ' THOMASEGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS January 6, 1982 FRANK DEMBROSKI CHAIRMAN EAGAN HISTORY COMMITTEE 1040 MCKEE ST EAGAN MN 55121 CITY OF EAGAN )4.7195 PILOT KNOB ROAD -' ;'. P.O. BOX 71199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA ~' 5511: PHONE 454-BIDO Ai Re: Status of Eagan.History Dear Mr. Dembroski: THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE CITY CLERK In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on January 5, 1982, I was directed to write a letter to you requesting submission of the draft history sometime prior to February 2, 1982.- -The City Council would like a copy bf the history of the City of Eagan as it is written so they can analyze the written product to date and determine how much additional effort and work will be needed by the committee. The City Council is concerned that the history be completed in the next several months so it can be properly advertised and made available for sale and distribution when the new Dakota County Library facility is opened sometime this fall. Mr. Ken Damlo,, who worked on the history approximately three to four years ago, is now employed as a City accountant with the City of Eagan. I would like to schedule a meeting at your convenience with Mr. Damlo at the City Hall to discuss the status of the history; and, if necessary, Mr. Damlo would be made available to assist you in preparing a draft copy for review by the City Council. I am also anxious to hear about your adventures in Alaska during 1981. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd 7/� cc: Ken Damlo 1774 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY BEA BLOMOUIST �, !:..� �I.. �,� • wY (� �.1 .a��Vf MAYOR THOMASEGAN JAMESA. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS January 12, 1982 JOHN VOSS CITY OF EAGAN •'`,,.2193 PILOT KNOB ROAD P.O. BO% 11199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA ' SSM PHONE 4$4.9100 j^ u�! DAKOTA COUNTY COMMISSIONER'` DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 W HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 Re: Byllesby Dam Restoration Dear Commissioner Voss: THOMAS HEDGES CITY AOMINISIPAfOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLERK In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on January 5, 1982, I was directed to write a- letter of encouragement and support relating to a Dakota County Board decision to pursue restoration of the Byllesby Dam. The City of Eagan is extremely supportive of any measures taken to preserve energy alternatives for the future. Your consideration and action to renovate the old Northern States power generators as an energy source at Lake Byllesby would be most responsible. The City is aware that the Department of Natural Resources has set aside $430,000 of matching funds for the improvements, and if there is any possibility of Dakota County receiving more money in state or federal funding and if support is needed from a munici— pality within the county, please feel free to contact us at any time. Sincerely, Q 6� g Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd cc: Fred Joy, Dakota County Administrator /%S THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY.