The URL can be used to link to this page

03/16/1982 - City Council RegularAGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL MARCH 16, 1982 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 — ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:33 — ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:35 — PROCLAMATIONS e.l A. Building Safety Week P 1 B. Kelly Girl Week IV. 6:40 — DEPARTMENT READ BUSINESS p 6 A. Fire Department p9 C. Park Department y B. Police Department e10D. Public Works Department V. 6:55 — CONSENT ITEMS (One motion approves all items) ?.11 A. Reconciliation & Certification of Destruction for Bond Issues F 21 B. Temporary Non—Intoxicating Liquor & Bingo Licenses for St. John Neumann Church 21 C. Project 323A, Receive Final Assessment Roll (Coachman Land Q Company First Addition) Q.21 D. Project 336A, Receive Final Assessment Roll (Tomark First Addition) .17.E. Johnson First Addition — Reapportionment of Special Assessments e'2I-F. Overhill Farm First Addition — Reapportionment of Special ?I Assessments VI. 7:00 — PUBLIC HEARINGS T. 2g A. Civil Defense Warning Siren Locations VII. OLD BUSINESS JIR A. Water Treatment Plant -:k. 6B. Appointments to Joint Burnsville/Eagan Cable Television Commission P'2 bC. Winkler Development Company for Rezoning from GB (General Business) to PD (Planned Development) to Allow an Office Complex— Hotel—Motel—High Rise on Approximately 17 Acres, Located in Part of the SW'y of the SA of Section 19 (north of Diffley Road and between the Cedar Avenue Freeway and T.H. 13) • 0 Eagan City Council Agenda March 16, 1982 Page Two VIII. NEW BUSINESS p.3 A. D.C.C.F. Inc. (Arnold A. Carlson) for a Waiver of Plat to Move a Lot Line 13' for Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd, and Lot 7, Block 1, Wilderness Park 3rd, Located in Section 27 3'7 B. National Amusement Co. (Sam Nilba) for a Conditional Use to Allow p' More than 3 Amusement Devices in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) District, Located in a Portion of the Cedarval Shopping Center, Located in Part of the NE'g of Section 19 45' C. U. S. Homes Corporation for a Preliminary Plat (Lexington Place) P' Consisting of Approximately 84.62 Acres Located in Part of the A of the SA of Section 14 (east of Lexington Road and north of Wescott Road) p C 5D. Tomark Development Company for a Preliminary Plat (Tomark 2nd Addition) Consisting of Approximately 25.3 Acres Located on Outlot A, Tomark 1st Addition in Section 14 (south of Yankee Doodle Road and east of Lexington) 'd. E. Roger and Judith Urban for Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to r I-1 (Light Industrial) District and for a Preliminary Plat (Alpha Addition) Consisting of Approximately 12 Acres and Containing One Lot Located in Part of the SE'y of the SEk of Section 25 (north of Cliff Road in the T.H. 3 area) 9.9 Z F. Overbill Farm First Addition Final Plat Approval P y j G. Amusement Device License for Applebaums Food Store IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 9 SA. Resolution to Consider Funding for Proposed I -35E _ q% B. Carol Lindo Discussion Regarding Assessments FjooC. Request for Extension/Commercial Revenue Bonds for LaHass P IpoD. Posting Board/Police Department Building P' X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 11, 1982 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval of the March 2, 1982 regular City Council minutes and the the March 16, 1982 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration: BUILDING SAFETY WEEK A. Building Safety Week -- The week of April 12 through April 16 has been proclaimed by Governor Quie as Building Safety Week. Chief Building Inspector Peterson has a proclamation, a copy is enclosed on page Z for your review. Also enclosed on page 3 is a copy of t—H—e-Rorth Star Chapter legislative policy state- ment. There is a seventeen minute slide program which is quite interesting and emphasizes building safety that Chief Building Inspector Peterson and the City Administrator would like for the City Council to have an opportunity to review. Due to the length of the agenda, the slide program will begin at 6:15 p.m. in the City Council Chambers for those members of the City Council who are able to attend. The regular City Council meeting will begin promptly following the slide program. KELLY GIRL WEEK B. Kelly Girl Week -- Each year, the City of Eagan participates in a proclamation honoring "Kelly Week". Enclosed on pages 4 through S is a copy of a news release that provides back- ground on Kelfy-7ervices and, more specifically, their Kelly Week which is designated as March 14 through 20. Proclamation WHEREAS: THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE NORTH STAR CHAPTER OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS 15 COMPRISED OF BUILDING OFFICIALS OF THE VARIOUS CITIES AND COUNTIES OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA; AND WHEREAS: IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF BUILDING OFFICIALS TO ADMINISTER THE STATE CONSTRUCTION CODES, ADOPTED BY THE CITIES AND COUNTIES CONCERNED WITH PROVIDING A MINIMUM MEASURE OF PROTECTION FOR THE HEALTH. SAFETY, AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE AFFORDED BY THESE CODES: AND WHEREAS: THE GENERAL PUBLIC SERVED BY THESE OFFICIALS IS OFTEN NOT CLEARLY INFORMED OF THE ACTIVITIES NECESSARY IN ADMINISTERING THE CONSTRUCTION CODES: AND WHEREAS: THE FAILURE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO RECOGNIZE THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION CODES ADOPTED AND ADMINISTERED BY THESE CITIES AND COUNTIES OFTEN SERVES TO IMPEDE THE EFFORTS OF THE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENTS; AND WHEREAS: PUBLIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENTS WILL SERVE NOT ONLY TO FACILITATE THE WORK OF THESE INSPECTORS, BUT ALSO ASSIST THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN ASSURING PROTECTION OF THE HEALTH, SAFETY. AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC; NOW. THEREFORE, 1, ALBERT H. OUIE, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DO HEREBY PROCLAIM THE WEEK OF APRIL 12 THROUGH APRIL 16. 1982 TO BE B U I L D I N 6 SAFETY WEEK IN MINNESOTA. AND HAVE ASKED LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR LOU WAN68ERG TO PREPARE THIS PROCLAMATION AND DISSEMINATE THE SAME. FURTHER, I URGE CITIZENS TO BE AWARE OF THE ROLE THE BUILDING OFFICIALS PLAY IN PROTECTING THE HEALTH. SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF MINNESOTA. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS AND CAUSED THE GREAT SEAL OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO BE AFFIXED THIS FOURTEENTH DAY OF JANUARY IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-TWO, AND OF THE STATE THE ONF HUNDRED TWENTY-THIRD. G0VERN03„ a✓�G�� (/ LIEUTENANT OF STATE z ,North Star Chanter Legislative Policy Statement 0 In accordance with the Minnesota Laws 1971, Chapter 561 which establishes the State Building Code and a system of surcharges to support the administration of the Code. The State Legislature should assure that the State Building Code remain as the minimum standard for construction throughout Minnesota by: 1. Not allowing communities to adopt alternative, or more, or less restrictive codes. That the S.S.C. be the only building code used by municipalities, design profes- sionals and the construction industry throughout the state. 2. Encourage local communities to voluntarily adopt the S.S.C. by: a. Allowing joint powers inspection agreements between communities. b. Allowing communities to contract for private code enforcement. e. Consolidating agency inspection functions such as handicapped provisions, energy related requirements, health service or related licensing require- ments, to the jurisdiction of the local building inspector. 3. Encourage uniform enforcement and interpretation of the State Building Code by continuing to require certification of all Building Officials by an initial state conducted exam and also to: Provide a continuing education program or a recerti- fication requirement. 4. Maintenance of the State Building Codes Division with adequate allocations of the state building permit surcharge fees being collected, to assure the following: a. Timely adoption of the latest editions of appropriate national model code documents. b. Adequate staff to maintain present level or expansion of existing educational programs to include: 1) Quarterly newsletters 2) Quarterly area one day educational seminars 3) Scholarship programs for more extensive educational opportunities for individuals 4) Sponsorship of communities membership in the International Conference of Building Officials c. Adequate staff to serve the code consultant needs of participating communities in the areas of: 1) Plan review on a request and fee basis 2) Experienced professional staff available for telephone consultation with local Building Officials on the subjects of: (a) Structural Analysis (b) Fire Protection (c) Plumbing (d) Electrical (e) HVAC (f) Handicapped Provisions (g) Energy Code Requirements (h) Mobile and Manufactured Home Requirements (i) Other Code Areas as Necessar7 3) Staff to serve as secretary to various advisory committees including: (A) Building Officials (b) Handicapped Code Advisory Committee (c) Structural Advisory Committee (d) Fire and Life Safety Committee (e) Mechanical Code Committee (f) Ad -floc committees as required 0 0 K L N Kelly Girl" People SERVICES 5275 Edina Industrial Boulevard, Suite 118, Edina, Minnesota 55435' CONTACT: Nell Piper District Manager A/C 835-6813 FOR D44EDIATE RELEASE KELLY14EEK CELEBRATION SET Telephone: 16121835-6813 ISSUED: March 5, 1982 For the 18th consecutive year, Kelly Services offices throughout the United States and Canada will celebrate Kellyweek, March 14-20 by honoring their more"than 300,000 temporary employees. In honor of'the occasion, eight local mayors have officially declared "Kellyweek" throughout the Twin Cities area. . During the week surrounding St. Patrick's Day, colorful buttons, costumes and flowers will highlight various activities... Kelly Fashion Shows... contests... breakfasts and luncheons for employees and customers. "we take this opportunity to honor all our temporary employees for thier outstanding skill and service" explains Nell Piper, District Manager of the Kelly District located at 5275 Edina Industrial Blvd. in Edina. In the Twin Cities, Kellyweek will be celebrated by holding a Shamrock growing contest at the Brookshire Board and Care Home for the Elderly. Kelly Services is constantly recruiting which includes Senior Citizens and the handicapped. To help those returning to the work force we upgrade their skills by offering free brush up classes on typing and shorthand through our Grolier "202" program. In addition we offer an excellent free course in word Processing. Look for us in the St. Patrick's Day 4 Kelly Girl Division • Kelly Marketing • Kelly Light Industrial • Kelly Technical • Kelly Health Care G.P.O. Box 1179 Detroit, MI 48266 Telephone: (313) 362.4444 KLLJ ;Plein^ • • SERVICES a - 2 - parades and on the Skyways in downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul. We'll be handing out momentos and offering free blood pressure tests. Also, a Kelly temporary employee from both ouf Kelly Girl and Light Industrial divisions will be honored by each of our eight local offices as the "Kelly Employee of the Year". These employees will be honored at a luncheon at the downtown Minneapolis Athletic Club. Kelly Services, Inc., one of the world's largest temporary help companies, has over 500 branch offices in the United States, Canada, Peurto Rico, England and France. They provide business and industry with temporary employees from six divisions: Office, Clerical, Marketing, Light Industrial, Technical, Health Care and Service Bureau. - 30- c.- Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Two 'DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- The Fire Department is proposing to locate a water ball on property adjacent to Fire Station #2 for training purposes. The property is owned by Northwestern Mutual Life In- surance Company. An agreement has been prepared by that company and presented to the City of Eagan that essentially holds Northwes- tern Mutual Life Insurance Company harmless of any injury or any other liability that may be encountered if the property is used for a water ball practive area. A copy of the agreement is enclosed on pages 7 through $ for your review. Fire Chief Childers will be present at the meeting to answer any questions regarding the proposed water ball practice area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny authori- zation of the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an agreement with Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company allowing the City to utilize property adjacent to Fire Station #2 for a water ball practice area. 0 Pentagon OIIISe,Park THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE Suite 424 • 4940 Viking Drive INSURANCE COMPANY • MILWAUKEE , `I' L Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Telephone: 612 835-6626 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT OFFICE Tom Hedges, City City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Eagan, Minnesota Gentlemen: Administrator Road 55122 March 8, 1982 We understand that your Fire Department would like to use a portion of our property located on Lone Oak Circle in the City of Eagan and next to Fire Station No. 2 for a water ball practice area. We are prepared to make such property available at no cost to the City of Eagan for such purpose, subject to the following conditions: 1. The property, legally described as the South six feet of the North 156 feet of the West 200 feet of Lot 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 ("Property"), shall be used solely for the purpose of a water ball practice area and for no other purpose. 2. Any equipment and improvements to the Property will be made at the sole cost and expense of the City of Eagan. Any such improvements will be temporary in nature and will be removed at the cost and expense of the City of Eagan upon termination of this Agreement. 3. This Agreement will terminate at any time upon 30 days written notice given by the undersigned to the City of Eagan by letter addressed to the City of Eagan and deposited in the United States mail. 4. The City of Eagan shall indemnify and hold ourselves and the Property harmless from any and all liability arising from or relating to the construction of any improvements, or use thereon, including without limitation any personal injuries to participants or spectators or other persons in connection with the water ball practice area. Neither the Property, nor any portion of our remaining property in Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2, shall be available for any other use by the City of Eagan without our prior written consent. You shall provide to us certificates of liability insurance evidencing the fact that the City of Eagan, and/or its Fire Department, has and maintains public liability insurance covering employees and guests of the Fire Department who participate in the water ball activities in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injuries to one person and relating to one occurence. Such certificate of liability insurance shall be issued in favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and shall provide for 30 days notice to Northwestern in the event of any termination or cancellation thereof. If such policy shall not be renewed and continue in force and effect, this Agreement shall immediately terminate on the date when such insurance policy shall lapse. City of Eagan March 8, 1982 Page Two If the foregoing reflects your understanding of our agreements, please execute a counterpart of this letter and return it to Mr. Thomas S. Davis at The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, Suite 424, Pentagon Office Park, 4940 Viking Drive, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435. You will be authorized to enter and make use of the Property, subject to the terms of this letter, when we receive a signed counterpart of this letter and the certificate of insurance required hereunder. We are pleased to cooperate with the City of Eagan in this fashion. Very truly yours, THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. Its Senior Representative The foregoing has been read and agreed to. We will provide the Certificate of Insurance and use the Property only subject to the foregoing conditions. Dated:_ , 1982. CITY OF EAGAN 0 And is cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney W 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Three POLICE DEPARTMENT 41 A. Police Department -#l: Chief of Police DesLauriers would like authorization to proceed with the hiring of one (1) part time person to work twenty-four hours per week or two (2) part time persons to work twelve hours each per week as police dispatchers. Item #2: A recommendation has also been received from Chief of o�Iice DesLauriers that Mr. Ron Gjorvad be hired as a police officer effective April 1, 1982. Item #3: That Mr. Jim Sewald be hired as a police officer subject to positive results on psycological and physical examinations, effective July 1, 1982. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the hiring recommendation for the dispatcher position and the two (2) personnel for sworn police officer positions. (Special Note: These items are approved as a part of the 1982 budget.) PARK DEPARTMENT C. Park Department -- Item #1: The Director of Parks and Recrea- tion is planning to prod -with the construction and placement of five (5) park signs for community and neighborhood parks this summer. These five (5) signs were approved as a part of the 1982 budget. The signs to be installed include Highview Park, Cedar Pond Park, Blackhawk Park, and Bur Oaks Park. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee is also recommending that Rahn Park be officially named Rahn Park and a sign would be installed as the fifth sign at that park. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APRC to name Rahn Park Rahn Park. Item #2: The Director of Parks & Recreation, after lifting the ub-dget freeze, is proceeding with the purchase of the capital outlay budgeted for the Parks & Recreation Department. The following equipment is to be purchased by the Parks & Recreation Department: a forty inch Gravley mover to be used in ditches, by the Police Department and other related embankments and other types of surfaces in the the amount $3,645; a power deck pull behind mover deck in the amount of $1,225 to replace an old John Deere mower; one (1) hand mower; one (1) hand trimmer; and one (1) trailer with a weight capacity of 12,000 lbs. that will carry both groundmaster mowers and other purposes while performing the summer mowing cycling pro- gram. The Parks & Recreation Department along with the Public Works and Water and Sewer Departments are considering the purchase of one F-10 truck each through the Hennipin County purchasing pro- gram. This will provide the City an opportunity to size down on 7 E Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Four 40 trucks for supervisory and non -hauling purposes from the one ton or three-quarter ton pickups traditionally used. There is one item that was not included in the budget and that is a snow blower attachment for the Gravley mower that is being purchased. A snow blower would cost approximately $1,100 as an attachment. Currently, the John Deere which will be traded once the aforementioned mower deck is purchased has a snow blower which is in need of repair. The repair will run approximately $1,100 and the City would still have a used piece of equipment. Since the City can sell the snow- blower attachment and the John Deere for an estimated sum of $800, it seemed appropriate to purchase the snow blower attachment for the Gravley. Actually, there is little additional expense incurred by the City of Eagan, realizing there would have been a repair cost essentially the same as the cost for the new snow blower and, in addition, there will be revenues realized by the trade in of the existing John Deere. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny approxi- mately an $1,100 expenditure for a snow blower attachment for the Gravley forty inch mower. Item #3: Teen Program -- The Advisory Parks & Recreation Committee is recommending, after several months of study, a teen program. Background information regarding the teen program is enclosed on pages i work through /b Also enclosed is a copy of the teen voluteer contract ani -application form to the program that will be helpful in providing additional background for this item (pages 1-7 through /g ). The APRC is looking for instruction by the ity Council-for—potential endorsement for the program. The Lions Club has tentatively agreed to consider a nominal amount of funding if the City Council accepts the concept and program. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Committee re- garding the concept of a teen program and to direct the staff to begin to firm up and enter into agreements for transportation as well as allow the advisory committee to seek additional outside funding from other sources to supplement the departmental budget. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D. Public Works Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Public Works Department at this time. /0 • March 11, 1982 ME1MO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR Iv FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: TEEN PROGRAM A sub -committee of the Parks and Recreation Committee have for several months now been studying potential teen programs. As you recall, during the late summer of 1980 the department discontinued the then Teen program that was being offered. This program was discontinued because of the limited attendance and the prohibitively high cost per individual that was being occurred by the department. Since then the Advisory Committee has recognized the need to offer some teen programs and have been trying to identify a methodology for providing this service. The sub -committee has met several times during the last several months with church leaders, police, as well as contacting other communities to see how they provide their teen programs. Recently, the Advisory Committee has been focusing in on one particular aspect of a teen program, which is a teen volunteer/ work program. The proposal attempts to provide some constructive volunteer work experiences for teen -alters age 13 through 15. The work experience seeks to simulate the experience of application/interview and actual job exposure. Secondarily, the City of Eagan would be able to benefit by having these youths performing a variety of tasks in the parks and re- creation system. Attached to this memo is the "second draft" of the teen volunteer project "proposal" which was submitted to the Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee at the March 4, 1982 meeting. The proposal outlines some of the objectives - publication, application and selection procedure as well as the necessity to provide supervision, transportation, meaning- fuliwork projects and a basic work contract. The Advisory Committee recom- mended that this proposal be presented to the City Council for their review and concurrence before the Advisory Committee were to continue working on this concept. Perhaps the two singularly largest issues that must yet be resolved is budget and transportation. The department has budgeted approximately $500.00 for potential teen programs through 1982. However, this proposal has set its budget expenditures at between $900.00 and $1,100.00. This sum is based on a $500.00 "salary" to be paid in a "lump -sum" to each individual participant; transportation cost and funding for incidentals such as a "final" event" for all volunteer workers to participate in. Committee member Carolyn Thurston has made contact with two community civic organizations to determine if they would be interested in making a financial contributions to assist in this program. A specific dollar amount was not solicited as neither committee or council approval had been obtained for this project/proposal. It is hope- ful to that additional funding might be had from other civic groups to supplement existing budget dollars. In terms of transportation, committee member McNeely had been tracking on both a paid bussing program as well as a volunteer bussing program from a local church group. Apparently, the church group may be willing to provide the buses at no charge providing the City would be willing to secure an insurance binder and provide routine maintenance on the vehicles while being used by the City. This would include both gas and oil. A driver for the vehicle would also have to be licensed, which the department could provide from its existing labor force. (Also attached is a draft of the summer teen volunteer work contract and application form to the program which helps describe the intent and purpose lI Teed Program - Memo March 11, 1982 Page 2 of this program for interested teens.) The Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee, would like to have this presented to the City Council at its March 16th meeting under departmental business or at the conclusion of the regular City Council meeting for their review and discussion to determine if the committee should pursue this work program. Specifically, an authorization by the council to proceed, to allow staff to begin to firm up and enter into agreements for transportation as well as to allow the Advisory Committee to seek additional outside funding from other sources to supplement the depart- mental budget, is sought. Should you have any questions in regards to this item please feel free to contact me. /a • • 2nd Draft 2/26/82 TEEN VOLUNTEER PROJECT - PROPOSAL OBJECTIVES: 1. To provide a constructive volunteer/work experience for teens ages 13 through 15. 2. To provide the experience of application, interview and fulfillment of contract expectations. 3. To mold a cohesive group from individuals of diverse neighborhoods and schools. 4. To provide the opportunity for teens to develop pride in the City of Eagan Parks system. S. A means to beautify and improve the City of Eagan. PUBLICITY, APPLICATION, SELECTION: 1. The summer Newsletter, slated for mid-May delivery will be the major source of publicity. a. Teens may not always read, however their parents hopefully will. 2. Applicants will fill out a form as for regular employment. a. Devise a separate form for this - information such as: 1) Allergies b. Forms available at Parks and Recreation office. 1) Mail out 2) "Application day" at Cedarvale/Parks and Recreation office. 3. Interview by groups of 5 or 6 a. Groups comprised of teens from differing neighborhoods. 4. Criteria for selection a. Maximum number determined by budget - approximately 20. b. Interest, enthusiasm, availability. c. Mix of ages, neighborhoods. S. If too many teens apply a. Select oldest first. b. Ratio of boys/girls the same as what apply. "CONTRACT" 1. A contract will be designed and a meeting of all those selected held to explain the departments expectations, specific aspects of the program and their responsibility. 2. The signed contract is their promise to follow through; also the de- partments affirmation to provide the experiences as stated. 3. Telephone call from the teen if they are ill on a project day.The week of the culminative activity. a. One "make-up day" if needed so that the contract can be ful- filled by a teen who missed one day. b. More than one miss abrogates the contract. TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES 1. Parents transport children to the public works building or the site of the days activity. 2. Department provide a bus to pick up teens at: a. The 5 elementary schools in Eagan b. Or designated park sites. 3. Teens bused to: a. The activity site 13 b. The public works garage. 0 0 4. Bus returns teens to pick up point. BUDGET 1. The dollars available must provide: a. Transportation for all activities b. The "contract" remuneration for each completes all projects. 1) 20 teens @$25.00 = $500.00 c. "Tickets" for culminating activity. d. $25.00 for incidental treats. PROJECTS 1. Time Frame teen who successfully. a. Projects planned for 5 consecutive weeks, one day per week; always the same day. 1) A 6 hour project day 8:00 AM - 2:30 PM would a) solve the maintenance man overtime possibility. b) Take into account a 13 year olds attention span. 2. Projects to be provided: a. The five projects will be identified and the specific day each is to be accomplished will be provided at the beginning of the program. 1) This will allow parents to know specifically where their teens are. b. Examples of the types of projects possible are: 1. Weed a tree nursery 2. Paint garbage cans 3. Pick rocks at Northview Athletic 4. Collect trash at various parks - developed and/or undeveloped. S. Weed play perimeters in parks 6., Paint a hockey rink 7. Dakota County Parks "if they contribute" 3. Rainy day alternatives: a. Have projects in reserve that can be done indoors providing space for the number of teens involved can be determined. SUPERVISION 1. A regular full time maintenance man Minimum number of 2 2. An adult volunteer a. Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee b. Retired people c. A service organization SPECIAL EVENT 1. The culminating activity will be selected by consensus by the group from a list of economically feasible possibilities. a. examples 1. Horse back riding 2. Apple river tubing I4 0 0 3. Twins game 4. Valley Fair S. SHAKES - all you can eat day 6. A movie TEEN WORK PROGRAM - TIME FRAME 1. Finalize program content and budget by April 1S. 2. Publicize in Newsletter - mid-May delivery. 3. "Applications" until June 1. 4. Interviews - in groups week of June 7. S. First "work" day June 17 ---- last July 15 (if Thursday is the day) 6. Special event the week of July 19. /s • • 2/25/82 TEEN PROGRAM BUS RATES KAL 1) $90.00 per day with driver furnished. 2) Without a driver it is $24.00 per day plus .201 per mile and plus fuel. Maintenance and insurance would be provided by the City. SAFEWAY 1) $70.00 per day with driver furnished . x 5 = 5350.00 2) Without a driver the rates would be negotiable, probably would compare with the KAL rates. CEDAR GROVE BAPTIST 1) The pastor is quite reluctant. ROSEMOUNT BAPTIST CHURCH 1) Has 12 buses "may work something out" 16 • CITY OF EAGAN • PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 3501 COACHMAN RD. EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 SUMMER TEEN VOLUNTEER/WORK CONTRACT It is hereby agreed by and between the Eagan Parks and Recreation Department and as follows: your name) 1. The said (your name) shall perform all of the Summer Teen Volunteer/Work projects as assigned by the Parks and Recreation Department. 2. The City of Eagan shall reimburse said (your name), as follows: $25.00, paid at the end of the program plus a culminating re- creational activity to be held on Thursday, July 22, 1982. 3. The Parks and Recreation Department shall provide transportation to and from the project site form the following sites: a. Pilot Knob School d. Rahn Park b. Oak Chase Park e. Cedar School c. Thomas Lake School f. Woodhaven Park 4. Terms and Conditions: a. Five projects will be conducted on Thursdays beginning June 17 and ending on July 15, 1982 between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 2:30 P.M. b. In the event that said is ill on a project day, he/she will call the Parks and Recreation Department 454-7802 no later than 8:15 A.M. c. Each participant shall bring his/her own lunch. The lunch break will occur between 11:30,= Noon. d. Participants are to wear shoes not sandals or clogs, long pants and sleeves. Gloves and a hat are'suggested. e. One make up day will be provided on Tuesday, July 20, 1982 for partici- pants who have one day to make-up. f. More than one absence terminates the contract immediately. g. Undisciplined behavior on the part of a participant will result in the contract being terminated. S. Projects to be accomplished are: June 17 - June 24 - July 1 - July 8 - July Is - 6., Rainy day alternatives �# 1 R 2 0 3 7. Describe any medical problems you have: Phone ✓t (Si ped (Date) Address: City State Zip 17 (Signed Supervisor Teen Volunteer/Work Progrm LSigned Director of FirKS ec) • CITY OF EAGAN• Draft PARKS E RECREATION APPLICATION TEEN VOLUNTEER/WORK PROGRAM Date: Name Last First Middle Address City State Zip Phone N Physical Record: What physical Please describe Date of Birth Month Day Year conditios do you have such as allergies, hay fever etc? In case of emergency notify: Name Day time phone.number Education Name F, Location Years Attended Favorite Subject Elementary Junior High or Middle School High School References: Name 3 persons you have known at least oneyear, not relatives or your friend, Name Address Telephone Years Acquainted 1. 2. 3. Interests: What you do in your spare time Hobbies Clubs you belong to A subject you study on your own Why do you want to participate in this program? (signed) date 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Five CONSE!NT-ITEMS. There are a total of six (6) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any item in further detail, that item should be removed from the consent agenda and placed under additional items unless the discussion required is brief. DISTRUCTION OF BOND ISSUES A. Reconciliation and certification of Distruction for Bond Issues -- The Director of Finance has solicited proposals from each bank acting as a paying agent for City bond issues to reconcile and then destroy all paid bonds and coupons on all City bond issues. To date, the City has received a response from only First Bank of St. Paul. Their cost to provide this service is $2.00 per bond and $.15 per coupon. Currently, the City must sort and store all bonds and then have a qualified person from a bank come out at a fee and expense to the City to verify reconcile and destruct the bond issue. Even with the sorting and storing that we currently go through, the City has no record at all of which bonds and coupons have been paid and which are outstanding since the City maintains no register of any sort. In addition, the City Hall does not have adequate storage for these records. The Director of Finance, with the concurrence of the City Administrator, is recommending that the City Council enter into an agreement with all paying agents to provide this service and further that the City Council approve the providing of this service at the time of all new issues. Enclosed on page Z,O is a sample agreement relating to the recon- ciliation and destruction as provided by the First Bank of St. Paul. The Director of Finance and City Administrator will coordi- nate this type of agreement with all future paying agents on all future bond projects. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve and direct the Director of Finance to proceed with an agreement allowing paying agents to perform reconciliation and certification of destruction for bond issues. /9 4111First Sagc 0 Saint Paul The First National Bank of Saint Paul 332 Minnesota Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55iol • AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE RECONCILIATION AND CERTIFICATION OF DESTRUCTION This agreement is between the (The Municipality) and the First Bank Saint Paul (The Paying Agent). Under terms of agreement dated the First Bank Saint Paul is Paying Agent on the bonds dated _ By this agreement, the municipality has further authorized the Paying Agency to perform a reconciliation and destruction certification function. Under this function, the Paying Agent will at least twice a year, furnish the a certificate of reconciliation and destruction stating the following: 1. Maturity Date 2. Dollar amount of coupons paid and destroyed 3. Dollar amount of bonds paid and destroyed 4. Balance on hand 5. Coupon numbers and bond numbers outstanding Upon agreement between the Municipality and the Paying Agent, the Paying Agent will start the reconciliation and certification function for the next maturity date. The function will not apply to the maturities previous to the agreement date. The Municipality and the Paying Agent have caused this agreement to be executed in their respective names and their duly authorized representatives. FIRST BANK SAINT PAUL 0 Member First Bank System MUNICIPALITY 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Six ST. JOHN NEUMANN FOR TEMPORARY BEER & GAMBLING LICENSE B. Temporary Non -Intoxicating Liquor and Bingo License for St. John Neumann Church -- An application was applied for by the Knights of Columbus for a temporary non -intoxicating liquor and bingo license for a March 28, 1982 event. In researching the reason why an annual bingo or gambling license is not applied for by St. John Neumann Church, the reason was given as a matter of economics. An annual license is $200 and a temporary event license is $10. St. John Neumann Church does not have twenty events during a year; and, therefore, by applying for an individual license, it is a savings to the church. There is some additional administrative time for the City staff; however, the 3.2 beer license would have to be applied for anyway and the process of the bingo license in addition to the non -intoxicating liquor license is not much addi- tional work for staff. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve the non -intoxi- cating liquor license and bingo license for St. John Neumann Church. PROJECT 323A C. Project 323A, Receive Final Assessment Roll (Coachman Land Company First Addition) -- Construction has been completed and final payment has been made to the contractor for the installation of public utilities for the above referenced subdivision. All costs associated with this project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll has been prepared. All costs associated with this project are being assessed to benefited properties with the exception of $3,913.63 that is being billed directly to the developer for costs incurred beyond that amount bonded for by the City for additions to the contract at the specific written request of the developer. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 323A (Coachman Land Company First Addition Utilities) and order the final assessment hearing to be held April 20, 1982. PROJECT 336A D. Project 336A, Receive Final Assessment Roll (Tomark First Addition) -- All construction associated with the construction of utilities for the Tomark First Addition has been completed and all costs associated with the construction and overhead have been tabulated. All costs associated with this project will be assessed against the benefited properties. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 336A (Tomark First Addition Utilities) and order the final assessment hearing to be held April 20, 1982. 2) 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Seven JOHNSON'S .FIRST ADDITION - REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS E. Johnson's First Addition, Reapportionment of Special Assessments -- Johnson's First Addition incorporated two unplatted parcels, both generally located in the northest quadrant of the intersection of Nicols Road and Kings Road. Johnson's First Addition had the final plat approved on September 4, 1979, but it has never been recorded. This reapportionment of special assessment was the last remaining requirement before the City would execute the final plat document to allow it to be recorded. Because this reapportionment provides for the levy of special assessments on a newly created lot by special agreement without the formal public hearing process, the staff feels that formal approval of this reapportionment should be obtained by specific Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: Approve or deny the reappor- tionment of special assessments associated with street improvement along Kings Road over Lots 1 and 2 of Johnson's First Addition. OVERHILL FARM FIRST ADDITION - REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS F. Overhill Farm Addition, Reapportionment of Special Assessments -- With the final plat approval of the Overhill Farm First Addition, Outlot B has been created and transferred to the City for park purposes. One of the City's requirements in accepting park land dedication is that it be free and clear of all taxes and special assessments. Developers requested that the special assessments associated with this Outlot B park land be reapportioned to Outlot A of Overhill Farm First Addition. The developer has agreed to the waiver of all hearings necessary to provide for this additional assessment to be levied against Outlot A and it is now being pre- sented for formal Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the reapportionment of special assessments from Outlot B to Outlot A of the Overhill Farm First Addition. ZZ 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Eight CIVIL DEFENSE WARNING SIREN LOCATIONS A. Civil Defense Warning Siren Locations -- During 1981, four (4) civil defense warning sirens were installed at various locations in the City of Eagan. The City was provided an option to purchase additional warning sirens at the same cost as bid for the original warning sirens. As a part of the 1982 budget, the City Council approved the purchase of four (4) additional warning sirens to be installed in 1982. With eight (8) warning sirens installed throughout the community, a vast majority and great percentage of the residents living in Eagan would be covered with the warning sirens. The City has budgeted approximately $41,000 in the general fund to purchase civil defense warning sirens in 1982. The City Administrator sent out a letter to approximately twenty property owners who represent areas around four (4) different locations within the City informing them of an informational meeting to be held on March 9, 1982 at which time the County's and City's Civil Defense Directors would provide background information on the pro- posed site locations. Only two (2) adjoining residents.were present for the hearing. The City Administrator will provide background information regarding the civil defense warning sirens and Mr. Doug Reid, Civil Defense Director, and Dale Grimes, Dakota County Civil Defense Emergency Preparedness Director, will be present to answer any questions regarding the locations proposed for the civil defense warning sirens. These locations will again be re- viewed on a large map at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the four (4) locations for civil defense warning sirens within the community and authorize a purchase order for the aforementioned sirens. a3 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Nine 0 0 OLD BUSINESSh WATER TREATMENT PLANT A. Water Treatment Plant -- During the summer of 1981, the Council elected to initiate action pertaining to a water treatment plant to define a specific course of action regarding this potential water quality treatment facility. In response to that directive the staff directed the consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates to prepare a report analysing the needs of the City as to the size, location and type of facility for consideration by the Council. In conjunction with the prepara- tion of that report, the City staff prepared a City-wide survey format which was mailed out with the fall 1981 newsletter to try to receive a response from the general public pertaining to any problems they may have experienced with the present quality of water within the City. In October of 1981, the results of this survey were tabulated and presented to the Council on December 1, 1981. In addition, the water treatment plant report prepared by the consulting engineer was also submitted. With this informa- tion, the City Council elected to hold a public hearing on January 28, 1982 to present the results of the survey and the preliminary report to the general public. At this public hearing on January 28, the Council received additional input from the general public. They then closed the public hearing and continued consideration of this item until March 16, 1982. On March 11, the public works committee discussed the water treatment plant proposal and their comments and recommendations can be found within the report per- taining to the public works committee meeting forwarded to the Council's attention on pages /155' through jig as a part of the Informational Memo by the City-dministrator. After reviewing the results of the survey information returned by the community, comments of the public hearing and the general consensus of the phone calls that staff receives during the normal working days, it is apparent that there is no desire nor request for the City to construct a centralized hardness reduction treat- ment plant within the City. However, the City staff still continues to receive calls from concerned citizens pertaining to poor water quality resulting from high iron and manganese content. When the staff was directed to prepare a feasibility report pertaining to a water treatment plant facility, they had to take into consideration both a separate hardness reduction plant and an iron/manganese removal treatment plant with future expansion/conversion capabili- ties for a potential future hardness reduction facility. Subse- quently, the costs associated with this facility could not be as refined as if staff were looking at one specific water treatment facility to handle iron/manganese removal only. If hardness a4 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Ten reduction is to be eliminated from future consideration for water treatment, the staff would like to have an opportunity to perform a more detailed cost estimate to construct an iron/manganese removal treatment plant only of adequate size to meet the minimum needs of this community. Once this is performed, the final cost estimates may be more in line with the potential benefit that can be derived. The staff would then like to have the opportunity to present this information back to the general public in another newsletter survey informing the community of the results of the past survey and the refined costs associated with iron/manganese removal only. With this information, the staff feels that a more accurate response could be obtained for the Council's information pertaining to the community's desires for such a facility. The Director of Public Works is requesting that the Council give heavy consideration to the desires of the existing residents in the community in addition to strong consideration for what type of water quality they want to provide for future citizens of this community in addition to potential future commercial and industrial development in this community. The Public Works Department is concerned about future water conservation measures that may be mandated by the state and/or federal governments restricting the City's ability to continue the practice of flushing water mains down the storm sewer to eliminate a water quality problem that could more effectively and efficiently be handled by a water treat- ment facility. The Public Works Director and Public Works Committee will be availa- ble to discuss in further detail possible recommendations for Coun- cil consideration or action on March 16, 1982. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a water treatment facility or authorize staff to prepare a supplementary report and subsequent survey for future distribution. as 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Eleven APPOINTMENTS TO JOINT CABLE COMMISSION B. Appointments to Joint Burnsville/Eagan Cable Television Com- mission -- At the March 2, 1982 City Council meeting, a joint powers agreement was adopted between the Cities of Eagan and Burnsville to establish a cable communications commission. According to Article 6, Section 2, each City Council shall appoint by resolution four (4) directors, at least one of whom shall be a City Council Member and the other three shall be residents of the member, or the City of Eagan. Each City Council, according to Section 3, shall also appoint one (1) alternate to the commission. Therefore, it will be necessary for the City of Eagan to make five (5) appoint- ments to the cable commission. These appointments can be more than one (1) City Council Member but must be at least one City Council Member. Those cable members expressing interest at the March 11, 1982 Cable Television Advisory Committee meeting were Barry Tilley, Lloyd Krob, Ron Voracek, Bob Peterson, Rick Bertz, and City Council Members Jim Smith and Tom Egan. Cable Television Advisory Committee Members who would not be interested in serving on the commission are Steve Mattson, Charles Shults, Mayor Bea Blomquist and City Councilmembers Ted Wachter and Jerry Thomas. Absent members of the committee (George Fryman, Mark Parranto and Dale Hagert) will be contacted by the City Administrator to deter- mine if they would be interested in serving on the commission and that information will be given to you before the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To appoint five members to the cable television advisory joint powers commission for the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan. WINKLER DEVELOPMENT - PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BLUFFVIEW C. Winkler Development for Rezoning from GB to PD to Allow an Office Complex -Hotel -Motel -High Rise -- A public hearing was held by the APC at the January 26, 1982 meeting to consider two (2) applications submitted to the City by Winkler Development Company which are as follows: A request to rezone approximately 17 acres from GB to PD to include a motel -hotel -office -high rise complex in uses which are permitted in the GB category. 2. A request for preliminary plat for Bluffview Plaza Develop- ment consisting of approximately 17 acres. The APC had continued the action on this item until the February 23, 1982 meeting, pending a recommendation by the subcommittee studying height limitations. The APC did take action at the Febru- ary 25, 1982 meeting to recommend approval of the planned unit development zoning, however felt there was not enough detail in the preliminary plat and continued any action on the preliminary plat for Bluffview until a detailed preliminary plat outlining the first phase of development was presented to the APC. For 26 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Twelve additional information on the project, refer to pages 67 through 74 of the March 2, 1982 packet. Action that was taken by the City Council at the March 2, 1982 meeting consisted of a basic concept approval of a hotel -motel at that location; however, due to the fact that Independent School District #191 was inadvertantly left off the abstractor's list for notification of the public hearing and had requested an opportunity to at least review the plans, the issue concerning a rezoning from GB to PD as recommended by the APC was continued until the March 16, 1982 meeting. A copy of the response presented to the City of Eagan by Independent School District #191 is found on pages Al through : For additional information regarding the rezoning from agricultural to a business use on that property, the records at City Hall indicate that the formerly owned Perrin property which consisted of 36.73 acres and consists of all of the 17 acres in question was zoned from A, agri- cultural, to C-2, the heaviest commercial zoning in 1963, speci- fically October 15, 1963.1 John Metcalf School was rezoned from C-2 (Commercial Property) to Public Facilities zoning on May 4, 1966. That school was opened in the fall of 1966 for educational purposes. Enclosed on page _ p is a copy of zoning uses permitted a under a GB classification nd an explanation of uses under a PD classification. The issue to be addressed at the March 16, 1982 meeting is the rezoning request. Any further consideration regarding height limitations for a building greater than three stories is not possi- ble until the final amendment changes have been made to Ordinance 52 and a specific application has been received from the developer and a public hearing is held before the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a conditional use permit and preliminary plat defining specific plans for any development including a building of greater than three (3) stories. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the Advisory Planning Commission to approve a rezoning from GB to PD of approximately 17 acres proposed for development by the Winkler Development Company. a� 0 BURNSVILLE•EAGAN•SAVAGE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 9 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CENTER March 11, 1982 The Honorable Bea Blomquist Mayor of Eagan Municipal Offices 3795 Pilot Knob road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor Blomquist: Last evening the School Board reviewed the proposed rezoning from General Business to Planned Development of property across the street from Metcalf Junior High and came to the conclusion that the District should oppose the rezoning until a definitive development plan is available that would enable us to determine the impact on students attending Metcalf Junior High. The motion adopted by the School Board is as follows: MOVED BY Director Bonin, seconded by Director Coskran that the School District be on record as opposed to rezoning this parcel of land due to the lack of definite plans for development and its possible effect on the school. Motion carried 4-2. The Board's concerns relate primarily to the safety of students and include the following: 1. Traffic - It appears that a Planned Development might generate a greater volume of traffic than development for General Business purposes. Anxiety was expressed with respect to traffic volume, patterns, and control, as well as implications for convenient access to the Junior High School. Some of these concerns could be partially addressed through control measures such as semaphores, school crossing lights, or a divided road- way to prevent vehicles from making left turns out of the development. 2. Types of Business to Be Constructed - An effort should be made to prohibit construction of businesses that would be an attractive nuisance for students or, con- versely, that would be adversely affected by a large number of teenagers in the area. Sale of liquor in close proximity to the school causes some apprehension as well; however, location and proper controls might alleviate this fear. 100 RIVER RIDGE COURT • BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 • 16121881.. 7 300 0 0 3. Upgrading of County Road 30 - Should increased traffic on County Road 30 warrant upgrading of the roadway, we would certainly object strenuously to condemnation of school property for this purpose or special assessments levied to pay for the improvements. As you can see, the Board's opposition to the proposed rezoning is directly related to concern for the safety and well-being of students attending Metcalf Junior High. When detailed plans are available, we would appreciate an opportunity to review them so that the impact on our school children can be assessed. Please accept our appreciation for the courtesy that you extended in postponing your action until the Board had an opportunity to consider this matter. Thank you for your continuing cooperation in our mutual efforts to serve the community. Sincerely, T. W. Foot Superintendent of Schools TWF/bh Carbons enclosed: Council Members Tom Hedges, City Administrator IX9 0 0 MESO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY •.� • r • • iar ra` DATE: MARCH 12, 1982 r a as a�• • ia. r r i ia�r r � • • is General Business Districts are designed for heavy use and businesses which serve other businesses and industry. Permitted uses within the General Bus- iness District include: Offices Lumber, heating and plumbing shops; small engine appliance/repair wholesale office, sales or showrooms for household goods Bawling alley, tennis club, skating, theater, archery and other enclosed recreational facility Car wash, auto accessory sales, motor vehicle sales Buildings having storage facilities Rental shops Animal hospital TV --radio stations Stone/monument sales Private clubs, lodges or health clubs Armories - convention hall Research testing laboratories Garden store Bicycle, boat, motorcycle and snowmobile sales and service Printing business The permitted uses must be operated within a building. Conditional uses may be granted within "GB" zoning and many address the outside operation of per- mitted uses. • The Planned Development District represents supplementary zoning and does have precedence over underlying zoning. The City Council makes the dete=- nation as to what the planned development will include. The "PD" must adapt to the physical and aesthetic setting better than the "GB". The "PD" must be economically feasible. The "PD must benefit the community to a greater de- gree than would development of "GB". The City Council will not approve a "PD" preliminary plan without a planned development agreement. TLH/jach 30 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Thirteen DCCF INC. FOR WAIVER OF PLAT A. D. C. C. F. Inc. (Arnold A. Carlson) for a Waiver of Plat to Move a Lot line 13' for Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd, and Lot 7, Block 1, Wilderness Park 3rd -- An application was submitted to the City and a public hearing held by the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a waiver of plat to move a lot line 13 feet for Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd Addition, and Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition, in Section 27. The APC is recom- mending approval of the waiver of plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Assistant's report, a copy of which is enclosed on pages3g� through � s for your reference. For a copy of the APC minutes, rear to page -g(C. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: recommendation of the Advisory Planning waiver of plat for DCCF, Inc. 31 To approve or deny the Commission to approve a • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT C� APPLICANT: D.C.C.F. INC. - ARNOLD A. CARTSON LOCATION EXISTING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF REPORT REPORTED BY APPLICATION SUBMITM PART OF THE NW; OF SECTION 27 1125 AQUARIUS IANE R-1 (RESIDENTIAL SINGE DISTRICT) FEBRI ARY 25, 1982 FEBRUARY 16, 1982 DAVE M. OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT An application has been submitted for a waiver of plat to move a lot line 13' for Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd Addition and Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition located in Section 27. At the present time, there is a house located on Lot 25, Block 4 of the Wilderness Park 2nd Addition. A swimming pool and retaining wall were also constructed in the backyard of this lot. However, both the swimming pool and retaining wall were inadvertently built 13' over the lot line thus encroaching onto Lot 7, Block 2 of the Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. At the present time, there is no house located on Lot 7, Block 2 of the Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. At the present time, there is a 10' drainage and utility easement that is cen- tered on the boundary of Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd Addition and Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. Thus, the sainming pool and re- taining wall are encroaching on the drainage and utility easements. Therefore, the City will require a new easement so as to allow for the necessary 10' ease- ment on this site. If approved, the waiver of plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) A new site plan must be submitted with the revised grading and contours to show the water runoff from Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. 2) The site plan must also include the proposed location of the new 10' ease- ment. 3) An executed easement document moist be prepared and submitted to City staff. 4) All other applicable City ordinances shall be complied with. DM/jack 3� I'lL NORTH LINE OF S112 OF SE.1/41 OF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 27 330.36 N 89056'38"E a % 0, 0 a kz w 0 ZP, A=90002'07" O 94,28 AioiiLe 0 0 mm 0 Z f2 Ajo a r�l 120.42 1., 12044 1. S 89057 28 W S89057'28"W ;- - le 6 7�m OD 30 0 30 135.25 057 28'W S8 'e; AIDUARIUS 0 j Nago 70. .;6504 2811 57" %8');,5F-28 E 0 La 0 0 E LANE. 2 2i M 0 w too. 10539u ! 0d I 135.27 S89057 28 W OyV CL IT C) 4b 0 0 2 0 Pet W- f CID C4 0 0 0 0 00 "4 1. 1� -% I 62 kmsc. P0.434 N S, P. �IEASEMEN[Tj PK. 135.30 SOUTH Ul 0000 : 104 97 S.E. 1/4 Of ;jp S89ft7'78*V o 204.97 lei S8905T'28"W - --------- r: p N '73 PUN R C.44, L DEI �INNESOT 4VALLH' SURVEYOR '&; XINEER ' CORP. ' .. 4 , .. -1001 EAST CUFF FIDAD t4_ / ;'t ��l00 NORTHEAST FOURTH STREET KMNSVUIJL Ai1NMEWTA Saw'! i ,p rr,, 7 GRAND RAPIDS, MINNESO rA 55744 "f ' a„ ir r P110Nti.�12: �7 rr • ".'; r p�10NE: (215) Jt6-052B a ,.�� :.-^ Certl[iate.gt$11n1q for .:• 'r-' ; 1 iMl�pERA/ES PARK<_SECOND.`'ADD/T/DN, ''f= C'OUNT'Y; • INNESOTA . ' f .�ii:e 2v. i.'%? ^ � i . a iy} ,� ♦ 1 ,:.` n i, .:kc � • - im '' t' • - /30.00 .... -- ``` I _`� 4`. .. ••. AAA,a A:A: �a O.S wide /09 ieieininy wo//s1 .. _1 House not shown a b': 811rq -. 46 t .. Y� droinoye and oi/ity eosement-i r !' Colxrete Curb O �;:.,• 1.4 it AQUARIUS LANE ' :JAN T NIDIUN AND k ri- •TURID' P'rA MIDTUN „G... !• 1125•'AQU4R1US LANE Niel mfm iia? amm-enwr ' EA6itK MN`r 55 121 WW aatGly that this is a true and correct repreaelltatlan W • attnas M lM 1pOwWAr4a o1 the above daaerlbad land, and of the location o1 IMdbjftr thereon. and all visible eoaeacNrrlu. H Only. has deN :, iT 3i %� s. _• :+ _- " + I�»y� by no this /O +" day of Morch '' + � ]teCt T+�A/M�f %.SO.rMwv ILLS. ,pat►. No PF.l' S •y is MJ�y`^r..� a 'y� :4y `4' .. A. ' 3 a R-3 ',", .. ~hi�'�' > `t•r�-,� �., ,, 4f,�~�„y��y, ;,e -i,.. O ` PF y/Y J t (, I ��c'S i seJ,E�."C�Rr'�• t NRR-3/��;, >�t �.��.,_ - - q ._._._ RTI. PF.. 1• f - PF IF`F e��, 1, :.�. x Gam' _ Wj fA :� �C. � int?.•: 1 PKC. PF ,,,. • 1 .) t:iu.ri^.m ter.') •4 c%d 11 r . •.. t C q P K .,, A f , 17 PF - - . R-1 )•J%) r`°Ri” y, • )Jl �e`yl`3' AT !eJ jh,.•NJT J.). u'� ly O M- ,:,).i JS r17J �, r, e j.PF on '�- PARKVIEW ',)v ))a; 2 , �.,}-.rdr'J'�),..• "k+•S• '7} r •trl•, S- GOLF j ♦J . ji: JS�> JJ,SIJ?,`'ii.�/}, 9� (� t V•�rJ I jJri rte+, J<� [• ••�� L) 1i •iiw) V A.) 1 J .J• j— rA)) �} 7yr} 1 iS i,. _ 1 COURSE A>rJx l,.'y •' J��.f )'.�, (i•.j� "i � r +.�+ L� �,� {.�i�t �)j-a,..),:!. .})•3. 1i. ))s )�)'J �).!+)+.',J. , JJt'.J1 1 •. ypi.)v� JaJ � ij �''..�.•) •-•Sy.:%.9 i v J% •JJ )J. �.Jr�� jt7`;),Af M)'J. '. M r ,')Sv'�,)+� � Uj) J�)� f 'i)J 3 ,.•l.r� �,,, ..:j�sJ•Ir 1 )3 )"r�. ") j •`?i Y 1 Ix •,,3' �+ t ,C! )) ..11 a? l i') �). � )J,_ � .1r1) rl � .•.+'� 3'))�J i') vi.r �) � -1 7V l. �•. l .. t ... r't .. -+-..aJ., , ):-. •fir'\L WILDERNESS PARR 3RD ADDITION - WAIVER OF PLAT The hearing was then convened regarding the application of D.C.C.F. Inc. and Arnold Carlson for waiver of plat to move' a lot line 13 feet for Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd Addition and Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. It was noted a swimming pool and retaining wall had been inadver- tently constructed over 13 feet of Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addi- tion, and the owners were requesting a waiver of plat in order to revise the lot line. It was also noted that the swimming pool and retaining wall were encroaching on drainage and utility easements and vacation of existing ease- ments would be required. Mr. Carlson appeared and there were no objections. Wilkins moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the applica- tion subject to the following conditions: 1. A new site plan must be submitted and approved with the revised grading and contours to show the water runoff from Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. 2. The site plan must also include the proposed location of the new 10 foot easement. 3. An executed easement document must be prepared and submitted to City staff for recording. 4. The existing encroaching drainage and utility easements shall be vacated. 5. All other applicable City ordinances shall be complied with, in- cluding compliance with all platting requirements. All voted in favor. 36 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Fourteen NATIONAL AMUSEMENT CO. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT B. National Amusement Co. for a Conditional Use to Allow More than 3 Amusement Devices in CSC District Located in a Portion of the Cedarvale Shopping Center -- An application was received for more than three (3) amusement devices for a business to be located at Cedarvale Shopping Center. A public hearing was held to consider the conditional use permit by the APC at a regular meeting held on February 25, 1982. There were a number of merchants present at the APC objecting to the conditional use permit. A letter of objection was received by the City from DCR Company and also a petition from several merchants in the Cedarvale Shopping Center objecting to a permit for amusement devices at Cedarvale Shopping Mall was received at the APC meeting. Copies of those petitions are enclosed on pages 3 through ±4 _ for your review. The Advisory Planning Commission s recommending denial of the condi- tional use permit to the City Council. For additional information regarding this item, please refer to the Planning Assistant's report which is enclosed on pages—¢I through for your review. For action that was taken by te APC, refer to page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the Advisory Planning Commission recommending denial of the conditional use permit to allow greater than three amusement devices for a business at Cedarvale Shopping Center. 37 CEDARVALE LANES 3883 Beau D'Rue Drive Eagan, Minnesota 55122 �.. City of Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Gentlemen: 0 DCR COMPANY 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 February 19, 1982 We have been notified that you intend to discuss the issuing of a Game Room license in the mall of Cedarvale Shopping Center on Thursday, February 25. We strenuously object to the issuing of this license for two basic reasons: 1. Our experience of Cedarvale Lanes has certainly shown us that direct supervision of these game rooms is necessary. We do not believe this supervision would be evident in the proposed game room area. 2. The City recently issued a license for a game room in the old A b W facility. Issuing another license in an area as close as this would, in our opinion, be too great a concentration of such facilities. CEDARVALE LANES Sincerely, M DCR COMPANY ichard I Stryker, Pr ident FEBRUARY �, 1982 The undersigned,being owners and operators of retail establishments in Cedarvale Shopping Center, do hereby petition the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission and City Council in opposition to the application of National Amusement Company for approval of a permit for amusement devices in the Cedar - vale Shopping Mall for reasons including the following: 1. The stores in the center have been experiencing serious theft problems in recent years and it is feared more will result with an increase in young people. 2. The shopping mall owners are not able to have full time policing which may become necessary in light of the hours proposed for the game room. 3. We are concerned about whether the person we understand has been chosen to manage the game room will be capable of properly supervising the younger patrons. 4. We have received information that other game rooms in Eagan have experienced policing problems and believe this could be detrimental to the retail shops in Cedarvale Mall. 5. We feel strongly that if the City approves the permit, it should be given only temporary approval which could be revoked after three or six months trial if complaints or problems arise. 3`I 0 0 FEBRUARY :l 1.982 The undersigned, being owners and operators of retail establishments in Cedarvale Shopping Center, do hereby petition the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission and City Council in opposition to the application of National Amusement Company for approval of a permit for amusement devices in the Cedar - vale Shopping Nall for reasons including the following: 1. The stores in the center have been experiencing serious theft problems in recent years and it is feared more will result with an increase in young people. 2. The shopping mall owners are not able to have full time policing which may become necessary in light of the hours proposed for the game room. 3. We are concerned about whether the person we understand has been chosen to manage the game room will be capable of properly supet;vising the younger patrons. ... _ ;,1,b..•, .. 4. We have received information that other game rooms in Eagan have experienced policing problems and believe this could be detrimental to the retail shops in Cedarvale Nell. 5. We feel strongly that if the City approves the.permit, it should be given only temporary approval which could be revoked after three or six months trial if complaints or problems arise. 40 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITICNAL USE PERMIT/AMUSEM?r DEVICES APPLICANT: NATIONAL AWSEMENT COMPANY - SAM NIIBA LOCATION: PORTION OF c EDAR ALE SHOppiM SER SATED IN PART OF THE NF}; OF SECTION 19 EXISTING ZONING: CSC (CcmmLvITY SHOPPING CEN=) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBKMW 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 10, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVE M. OSBF.RG, PIANNING ASSISTANP An application has been submitted requesting a conditional use permit in order to have more than 3 amusement devices in a CSC District (Canmz ity Shopping Center) located in the Cedarvale Shopping Center. At the present time, the National Amusement Canpany has three video games and several children's rides in the Cedarvale Shopping Center. The applicant is pro- posing to locate the three video games in a now vacant roan in the Cedarvale Shop- ping Center, and also to add 9-12 more video games in the room. The dimensions of this amusement game arcade are approximately 12' x 12', which the applicant feels is large enough to house the 12-15 video games that will be in the arcade. There are plans to have adult supervision in the roan at all times. No food, smo- king or drinking of any kind will be allowed in that amusement game arcade. The amusement game arcade will, at no time, remain open past 10 P.M. as the hours in which the amusement game arcade will be open will be dependent somewhat on the hours of the entire Cedarvale Shopping Center. If approved, the conditional use permit should be subject to the following condi- tions: 1. Fulfilling all requirements of Ordinance #73, Amusement Devices DMO/jach 4( D A PARKING PARKING 1 f • 1 f T V i 1 v I 1 'l'1 u`• �-'I^' CMCIUMC`•CJ'YI I u l I l l I• ' .�,R+n-. 7..,... ��';:\f, pis... i� � •�•�� N�— �;�--f � 5r,. .,,: 1•'r"• cji? t, :r � i:i:. :9t/,.;t,• .. _i 1.. , — �...( ',(r'(,,. ..;1—..:i S �� L;,, .. r.;,l V. .d• a.4.•1' .1•{t:�f�: rR::1' •' .;I 'a f�-: ,�,: .S`/i,�}- '7C r .� � •\. �•� -�!• •>,.j'•'��5' I - ac �•. t�.+.' aI ;•a:�, „'.1., :'.�.4 r•:S�d:I.�ra-.'�1'I.II' 1` '.. ."t :. l;•i �_ • w _ • C. � � :r •8r'r41: ' l (� .�' c�`f �,. L}'., 1.I• �..._ '�.:. .. �,•• 11 ' • %.<• if•' "-:i .lai '. lL. �: j •:4�.._ 1.(A�`1 I.: `iil ..�1t. ..i.'�• H•—i is 1.1�(�. .i �' ��1� .; It. .t•� •,•� �,��1.):��: I: );� ;�} .:�>.� .%1:�1. R•l'�'..`I. rl..l hw�. 'y3: i.T•S :•i �7-� •:': L.4.1 e: }%.. {�A.t. �� .. f '�.• ;r•� w t'a: ?. : '� 2 ' -, �y Y. /� f ..,. / ••s.i._:' 'A_.• E' ��':.-` 1:• �,w :. tL 'n' ti • \•��';:.,.'(`' ': „ •+ •,>• •,i:i+"il `�^tea �t�:}� ` ! s � ,,.a:Jr.'.-� •I .:�aw•'• �. ti••r5. 9.ti� 1 � 1 .. :,.. :,:•.' 1 •: I,.:; •• Sj.</a#�:'\'•I c+v:•r.C.. 1 1'•- ..� l(�''i ).��.,t. �:.. ., �a\�'S{. ::.: .r: �, "i-': :,,. :57�;. � �: t �'� \ i♦ 5, 1. '1 •!. 1.r. •F. :� • f� �•'f ••.•Ju.. .S 1. + 4'i� .T .. �''\� ..: r t _ 7-•..ne.� 4' 1 1 L. 1 '� 1,.•i mj'c•.�,:., .r.,t . �.�:, �M�aN.' o�.�i..•.i.. -C• •. ,• _ is--��K,_L}Lav'}iV'/"'i—^ •,r—_;�"a�.:•k�{'!?s.': ♦¢V` f-!•�{. .,a: _ **LQI czl 4� uci � 1 • p�i�� RIG i'OW ►car , y l PARKING PARKING .. I 47-4 p �. � R-4 LI q Ll LI G t LI — 'n. SILL \ La ibD i LB - VA (S� r. I� LI CSC •I , • CSC PF R-4 I OAR Ll R-ICAnrl :. An NFt G B Alt �r1KT tis EEN T PF; . ...,,.,.,,... PF JUNIOn - !NB ' tiPF 0 NB is HIGH B T i B-2 SCHOOL O r t , r Q 1 I _lav P \R-3C 3i 1 •6R ; rT R�•,E - _ �K 4 I Sv ��,�', PK•ifs, ,r�:•Lr--��E�'�'r. ; ..; ,:,.r. MARI R-4 CSC .<,c ; ....:...:^ .. n...,i ��,,,al, 0 0 NATIONAL AMUSEMENT COMPANY - AMUSEMENT DEVICE PERMIT The public hearing regarding the application of National Amusement Company and Sam Nilba for conditional use permit for more than 3 amusement devices in the Cedarvale Shopping Center was opened by the Chairman. Mr. Nilba was present as was Ron Dicker for the applicant. At the present time, National Amusement Company has three video games and several children's rides in Cedarvale Shopping Center and now proposes to locate 12 to 15 video games in a separate store location in the Center. The plan is for adult supervision in the room at all times, and no food, smoking or drinking of any kind would be allowed in the arcade. Mr. Nilba indicated that the amusement games have been located in the Center for many years and that the Center would be super- vised at all times. Allen Hoohsprung appeared and presented a Petition on behalf of 21 of approximately 35 retail merchants in the mall objecting strongly to the proposal. They were concerned about the possibility of inade- quate supervision and inability to control the young people that would be using the machines, the impact that the machines do have on minors and the adverse potential impact on the retail stores with excessive numbers of minors in the Center. A number of other shop owners were present in opposition. Mr. Nilba assured the commission that supervision would be adequate and if there was any problem, the landlord has a provision in the lease whereby the land- lord could close the arcade after a 15 day notice. He also asked for a 30 -day trial period and if there were problems, that he would then close the arcade. There were also concerns by persons present, including Planning Commission members, about the impact 'on the A & W Amusement Device Center located about one block to the west and also the bowling alley and it is understood that there have been problems in both locations. A letter from DCH Company and the owner of the Cedarvale Lanes objecting to the application also was submitted. Lloyd Krob explained that he had done extensive research regarding the amuse- ment centers and was concerned about their adverse impact upon minors and read miscellaneous articles from magazines and newspapers explaining the problems that have resulted in such centers. He further stated that members of the Eagan Police Department are concerned about the machines in other amusement device locations and it would be a deterrent to business in the shopping center. After extended discussion, Krob moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend denial of the application based upon the reasons that are out- lined above. All voted in favor. 4'i- 0 • Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Fifteen PRELIMINARY PLAT - LEXINGTON PLACE C. U. S. Homes Corporation for a Preliminary Plat (Lexington Place) Consisting of Approximately 4.62 Acres -- An application was re- ceived for a preliminary plat entitled Lexington Place consisting of approximately 84.62 Acres and Containing 28 condominium buildings for a total of 672 dwelling units. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the preliminary plat subject to condi- tions as outlined in the staff report. For a copy of the City ' Planner's report, refer to pages � through S 9 It was noted that the applicant is proposing to construct 26 twenty-four unit buildings with a variable mix of studio, one -bedroom and two-bedroom units. The APC noted that the parcel was presently zoned R-4 and that they could be considerably higher than what the applicant has proposed. The APC was concerned with the pricing of the units as proposed by Orrin Thompson which he quoted at $40,000 and up. Because some of the condominium units were defined "efficiency" and approximately 400 square feet in size, this raised an issue in the minds of the residents of the surrounding area. The City Administrator did direct a question to the City Attorney's office regarding regulation by the City as to the size of condominium units. This issue is addressed on page{, in a letter from the City Attorney's office. For additionlnformation on the action that was taken by the APC, refer to the APC minutes found on pages_ through 6 _J3_ I Enclosed on page 64 is the recom- mendation of the Advisory Park & Recreation Committee concerning this proposed development. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Lexington Place as recommended for approval by the APC. 4S 0 • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - LEXINGTON PLACE APPLICANT: U. S. H(WES CORPORATICN - ORRIN THCMPSON LOCATION: 105 OF THE SW; OF SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25., 1982 DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY W04 0; k1 NZ 61 FEBRUARY 17, 1982 DALE C. R[MM, CITY PLANNER An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat, Lexington Place, which consists of approximately 84.62 acres and contains 28 condominium buildings for a total of 672 dwelling units. Z=IG AND LAND USE Presently, the site is zoned R-4 (Residential Multiple District) which would al- low only multiple dwellings. According to Ordinance #52, the density could range between 12 and 22 dwelling units per acre. The proposed land use shows the area north of Duckwood Drive as _R-3 (Mixed Residential) with a density of 6-12 dwelling units per acre, and south of Duckwood Drive is indicated on the Como_ Plan as R-2 (Mixed Residential) with a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. The Co prehen- sive guide has always acknowledged that the actual zoning will supersede the pro- posed uses on the land use plan. Therefore, the proposed development is in con- formance with the zoning on this particular parcel. As mentioned above, the zoning on the parcel is R-4 (Residential Multiple) and could allow between 12 and 22 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is propo- sing to construct 28 24 -unit buildings for a total of 672 dwelling units. The proposed site has a gross density of 7.9 dwelling units per acre and a net den- sity of 9.17 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the development proposal is in line with the zoning of this site. The applicant is proposing to extend Duckwood Drive to the east of the property to provide access to the east when and if Carriage Hills C,olf Course is ever converted to a different use. Ducl:wood Drive is also proposed to be the resi- dential collector within Section 14. The applicant is also proposing a looped street on the north side of Duckwood Drive and a looped street on the south side of Ducici%rood Drive which provides a good circulation for the overall developmient. On the southerly looped street, there is also proposed one cul-de-sac which would provide access to 3 conday.nium buildings, or 72 dwelling units. The applicant is proposing to plat each of the 28 condominiun buildings into a lot which could stand separately on its own in accordance with setbacks, square 46 CITY OF EAG,AN LEXINGTON PLACE FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE Tf+10 footage, and public access. However, the layout of the proposed project, even though all lots do have public access, there has been common access to the pro- ject to service up to 3 condominium buildings, or 72 dwelling units. These ccnt- mon accesses reduce the curb cuts on the public street and provides a better de- sign by offsetting the buildings and allowing open space between groupings of complexes. The different angles tend to break up the development more so than having all the buildings at right angles, or parallel to each other, around the streets. The eor!non access also provides a good circulation within the devel- opment proposal. The proposed buildings will be 3 stories and contain 24 dwelling units. The ap- plicant is proposing the mix to be 6 studio units, 7 one -bedroom units and 11 two-bedroom units for a total of 24 units per building. At each end of the com- plex, there will be a 12 -car garage which will provide the 24 covered parking spaces per unit. The applicant has proposed .8 open parking spaces for the over- all developnent. Presently, the ordinance requires 1.5 open spaces per dwelling unit. However, in the study which had been conducted, staff has found that one covered space and one open space per unit has been found adequate for this type of dwelling unit, especially when the development consists of 13 units of the 24 are of one bedroom or less. Enclosed is a typical fact sheet put together by the developer which lists the types of units and the amenities which are provided with each condominium building. The 28 buildings cover 13.68% of the net acreage according to the present de- sign. The applicant has proposed two models of buildings ranging from the main building being 106' x 51' and up to 160' by 51' according to the mix provided for each building. If calculating all buildings to be 160' x 51' and two 12 - car garages, the lot coverage would only ane to 14.48 of the net area. Both are less than the 20% lot coverage requirement. The proposed plat is scheduled to be reviewed by the Advisory Park Committee Thursday, March 4, 1982 for their review and comment. However, staff is indi- cating that the last time the proposed plat was before the Advisory Planning Commission, there was a cash contribution per unit recommended and the potential for a trail connection to the proposed park in this general neighborhood. This proposed trail connection would thus be served from the cul-de-sac street to the south. Also, it is the staff's understandinc that the Park reeommsmdation would be a trail along Lexington Avenue and either a sidewalk or trail along Duckwood Drive for this proposal. However, formal action by the Park Committee will be March 4, 1982. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) Cross easements and parking easements shall be granted on the lots which are served by common access for more than one dwelling unit. 2) The outside parking spaces shall be of 10 x 20 dimension and the parking area shall be surfaced with concrete curbing around the perimeter of the parking area. 47 CITY CF EAGAN IMaNGICN PLACE FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE THREE 3) Haneamier Association by-laws shall be submitted and reviewed for the de- velcpment prior to the final plat of the first stage. 4) Detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted and approved by the City and a landscape bond shall be required for an adequate amount and not released until one year after the landscaping has been ompleted. 5) The preliminary plat shall be reviewed by the Eagan Park C.a[mittee and sub- ject to the Park Camtittee's rec wendations. 6) The applicant is proposing .8.open parking spaces per unit. A variance would have to be granted from the strict requirement of 1.5 open spaces per dwelling unit. Staff is reccmTnnding that one open parking space and one garage space be required for each dwelling unit. The Advisory Planning CaMlission may want to recamend to the City Council that amending the 2.5 parking spaces per ordinance requirement be reduced to 1 owrered space and one parking space per unit. 7) The preliminary plat shill be reviewed by Dakota County's Plat Catmissicn and subject to their reoamiendations. 8) All other ordinance requirements shall be net. DCR/ja(:n 9) Temporary service for sanitary sewer will be allowed through the Tanark Addi- tion for this proposed development under the condition that the internal san- itary sewer system shall provide flexibility in allowing approximately 60% of this development to be redirected in the future through the Windcrest trunk system to the south. 10) A storm sewer system connecting the proposed northerly pond (DP -18) with the pond in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue (DP -5) must be constructed as a condition of final plat approval. 11) A positive gravity storm sewer outlet to service the property south of Duck - wood Drive must be constructed to Hurley lake in addition to developing the internal ponding area referenced as JP -45. 12) The construction of a 44', 9 -ton collector street for the extension of Duck - wood Drive to the east plat line shall be the responsibility of this devel- opment. 13) A 55' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Lexington Avenue. An 80' right-of-way shall be dedicated for Duckwood Drive. 14) All related trunk area assessments and lateral benefit from existing trunk utilities must be paid or levied at the time of final plat approval, if not listed as a pending assessment under an approved project by the City of Eagan. CM OF EAGAN T NGrM PLACE FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE FOUR 15) Sufficient drainage/ponding easements shall be dedicated of sufficient size to incorporate the required storage capacities as follows: (DP -18 - 11.2 acre feet for a controlled elevation of 876.0) (JP -45 - 7.8 acre feet with a controlled elevation of 890.3) 16) This development shall provide for a future storm sewer outlet fen Pond JP - 46 within the Carriage Hills Golf Course. 17) A 10' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public right-of-way and adjacent to private property. TAC/jack M, 0 0 To: THE PLANNING CCMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RU UZ, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 1982 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - LEXIWION PLACE (U. S. HOMES CORP.) The Public Works Department has the following information for considera- tion of approval of the above -referenced plat: UTILITIES Water service availability will be provided by a southerly extension of the water main from the proposed Tomark 2nd Addition or frau the existing 18" trunk water main located on the west side of Lexington Avenue extend- ing north fran.Duckwood Drive. This 18" trunk water main will have to be extended south to the limits of this proposed plat to provide for the pro- per looping of the internal water main necessitated by this development. A 16" trunk water main will have to be extended along Duckwood Drive from Lexington Avenue to the east portion of this plat as a part of this de- velopment. In accordance with the recently updated Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, the entire area for the proposed Lexington Place Subdivision is proposed to obtain the sanitary sewer service through the installation of a lift station within the Windcrest Addition and an extension of a trunk sani- tary sewer system frau this lift station to Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. Laterals from this future trunk system are, then intended to be constructed northerly along Lexington Avenue to ultimately provide ser- vice for this proposed development. However, at this time, this lift station and trunk sanitary sewer extension have not been constructed nor is it in the planning process for the very near future. After detailed review of the elevations associated with this proposed development, it has been determined that all of the proposed units of this proposed plat can obtain temporary gravity sewer service to the north through the Ttmark Addition into the existing 12" trunk sanitary sewer located along Yankee Doodle Road. However, when saturation development occurs in the industrial park, there is limited excess capacity available for this pro- posed development. Therefore, a preliminary engineering study has been performed which indicates that all 672 proposed units could be serviced with gravity sewer through the Tomark Addition towards Yankee Doodle Road on a temporary basis until the Windcrest lift station and trunk sanitary sewer extension occurred sometime in the future. At that time, through specific detailed design of the sanitary sewer system, approximately 432 units would have their flow redirected to the south into the Windcrest lift station in accordance with the 1982 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. The remaining 240 units at the north end would permanently drain toward the north into the existing sewer on Yankee Doodle Road. We feel that this line could handle this small addition without any 'future re- striction on capacity as the industrial,area grows. However, in order to provide this flexibility, an estimated $35,000 ($50.00 per unit) would be required to install an auxiliary sanitary sewer line southerly along Lexington Avenue for this future connection. SV 0 Thomas A. Colbert February 25, 1982 Lexington Place Page two 0 Topography for the proposed development is generally rolling with a natural divide through the middle of the plat (Duckwood Drive extended). The drainage to the north lies within the LeMay Lake drainage basin with surface water runoff being conveyed to that Lake through a series of intermediate ponds and two future lift stations to be located north of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Lexington Avenue. Internal storm water will have to be directed to an onsite pond located in the northeast cor- ner of this proposed plat (DP -18) which will also provide for the over flow from O'Leary lake which is presently being constructed under Project 322, Contract 81-12. With the development of this proposed plat, an out- let frim the pond within Lexington Place will have to be coordinated and constructed with the internal storm sewer for the Tanark 2nd Addition which will provide for this drainage to the pond within Outlot D of To - nark 2nd Addition at the corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Ave- nue (DP -10). This pond within the Tanark ADdition will have to have its outlet constructed to the pond (DP -5) located in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue. If these three ponds are con- nected by gravity storm sewer, there is sufficient capacity to handle the proposed Lexington Place development as well as the proposed Tomark 2nd Addition. Pond DP -5 in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue will act as a "third tier" drainage basin providing for ponding for storm water only when the ponds within the Lexington Place and Tcmark Addition have reached capacity. Therefore, no outlet from DP -5 is anti- cipated in the near future nor is any extensive ponding easement acquisi- tion required at this time. Drainage for the southern portion of the proposed Lexington Place is di- rected into the Fish lake drainage basin through a ponding easement for Hurley Lake which is presently being acquired through condamiation fran the McCarthy property west of Lexington Avenue. In addition to the in- ternal storm sewer required for the southern half of this proposed de- velopnent, a storm sewer will have to be installed along Lexington Ave- nue and then west along Wescott Road to Hurley Lake. Hurley Lake pre- sently does not have a positive storm sewer outlet, but with the pond- ing easement presently being acquired and its existing capacity, the lift station outlet is not anticipated to be required for 3-4 years. The continuation of Duckwood Drive as a collector street from Lexington Avenue to the east edge of the plat should be continued as a 44' wide, 9 -ton street with a concrete sidewalk on the north side to the east edge of this plat similar to the existing Duckwood Drive. Because this plat requires the construction of a collector road prior to the City's time schedule for this road's construction, the developer should bear all costs associated with constructing this street to a collector status with sidewalks. si 0 • Thomas A. Colbert February 25, 1982 Lexington Place Page three Internal looped public streets as proposed provide adequate access to all proposed lots. The proposed cul-de-sac in the southeast corner is of ac- ceptable length and does not require a variance and is necessitated due to the configuration of the property and the topography involved. All other access to the units will be by private drives and/or parking lots. The overall proposed street layout provides good accessibility to Lexing- ton Avenue for this development. EASEMUM AND RIGHTS -OF -MY A 55' half right-of-way for Lexington Avenue will be required. Duckwood Drive should consist of an 80' right-of-way with the other internal streets being the standard 60' requirement. rem'nt. Internal easements will be required to provide for proper looping of the water main and sanitary sewer exten- sions as final details are determined. Pond DP -18 in the northern end of this plat should provide for a ponding easement incorporating 11.2 acre feet above the proposed controlled water elevation of 876.0. The outlet from this pond to the north into Ttoark will require the acquisi- tion of an easement across a 16.51 "cartway" strip of land under the ow- nership of the Carriage Hills Golf Course. Pond JP -45 and JP -42 in the southern portico of this plat shall provide for 7.8 acre feet and 2.3 acre feet of storage capacity respectively along with a corresponding ponding easement based on controlled outlet elevations of 890.3 and 887.1 respectively. All other standard easements will be rea_uired at the time of final plat approval. SITE PLAN The Engineering Department has no concerns pertaining to the proposed lay- out of the site plan as adequate access to public rights-of-way are pro- vided by way of private drives and/or parking lots. TRAILS/SME%VffM A 5' concrete sidewalk should be installed along the north side of Duck - wood Drive as a part of this development. An 8' bituminous trailway should be constructed along the east side of Lexington Avenue within a 10' easement adjacent to the west line of this proposed plat. in addi- tion, a walkway connection to the southeast corner of this plat should be provided as indicated by the Advisory Park and Recreation Committee. Think sanitary sewer and water area assessments have been levied under Project 58 to the property located on the north side only of the proposed extension of Duckwood Drive. This parcel (010-29) will be responsible for assuming the lateral benefit from trunk water main that presently exists along Lexington Avenue north of Duckwood Drive. Trunk area storm sewer assessments should be collected as a condition of final plat ap- proval for the north half of this proposed development. S 0 • 'Ihomas A. Colbert February 25, 1982 Lexington Place Page four For the land located within this proposed plat south of Duckwood Drive, trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer will have to be col- lected as a condition of final plat approval. In addition, all costs associated with the installation of internal utilities and/or the lat- eral benefit associated with the extension of the required trunk water main along Duckwood Drive and Lexington Avenue will be assessed against this property based on benefit received. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect pertaining to this report at the Planning Coimiission Meeting of February 25, 1982. Respectfully submitted, C;�' , Mamas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jack 53 �_ - � . .•\�tiH 1 HaP-4 -89 •e .:i._J!' rn-'•EE-� ` `..' \ rce ^OP_I6 •i.�i+b gyp, �\�• e9J.0./.iC.� � �- Ji :•� l il REfr ,E •v Fools EAGANOA1'T� '• •L I1fILC\L_.�±__ pP' / E / II D-4 PILi i oo is rv�-PANR-NQ 2-. _ SU 13Y 2EHNOE71 % ___...` �_•e /_!•- 'L-Sr3_I / / n' I<. a r.- _B 810 \ -LONE OAXK ROAp t -�•�`,•�� % D'c`0c- f ' ` D -V DP•13 I __.' B70.J l l' • ^ cHoot ../ �A ,•tl`• N?i(.'�-�e :'rY B76Del: iEAD 0-2 /. / ev' p,•�`.�`O _.'1 .r,. I, z A xORYeeEjlTiR--1'-_"}+,' I \ ` / E -n �•Pbie.o_ L_OP-2Dm Ix•._ -EA 0`4 I I V �BB03 871.0, / 6 / \ [rB>•7. o. NAY'&' 1 ! /• -lNDD TAI SARA N0. 3 �. / B- x.• a-� F[�^T .._. "i�l '�' .�;Ti'�I -.- seM / ,R' �L}� DP14 �J i r 0 SERoiP-3 EP -7 - \r`/I// e _ '/ VDP-19 860-0 �,� P B161T P / s Syo:875.0' 8309 884.0 8700 I v� L5.•4 1 890.0 CP'4+ \� "�(,•�/tet i \ B4El0u CR6 ADWTI°r �/` DP -6 •0g� 1p3 gDP-II i SAce= b v.9 / Cp-71.7. ' /( IDn $69.0" 3�;.8 8620 I I I ICE 1; • / C� 8400 e i ra i/,./ LS. -6 �v . •�RIRLIP _. / DP r5 N -48• E-8 / FOA 8300/ I •�• ? 842.0 E•• // is RIDGE I /� 11DP-4 �� 85 0 B B0 LA -7 •_--+fix % CP -1 -_ I' - / BIjR 1^ J�D �Jc /28 EI -a - •'/ rhvE.I .__,! ROxO pyn 0. Rp - E� J� •, ,�jx7_ •0 -LJ-' �� il�^�E 1 .a:i SURREY Ih�C"uExl]ECA P z I �r CP -2 x••/.:C-9 •TH Aoo 7tl DPg•IO L•/ 'wEscoTT JiHlu �r 8zoo 1 HEIGHTS $ O.� . P is .CP -1 WE5007 -�: 1, / 8x2. 'zNO 1`- / �� OJ EP _ 658.3 I BIBS--r-T� „ 1 BB,A I �_ 7 p • P=6 �." ��gp Ix' GARDENE n I LOT tt��8��803:: DP -7 P-7 71 O •�• ..,.770.G09.0B,80-0.Owl ..... B J. 0E { - e►�/.II 795-0 643.7; % PIC) Nbel Y45 �7i JP=13 �•, i JP -46.2 //TV J s-_- .']872.0 903 0 $910-3 �la'--•I f /?• qy N' �i�B392 v �'( •fP 4T 1, 'v -42 c~ 1� BB70 I "A .O��n�eeQPo��,QA /1.�/ q�,(, y Bu.O f153'� I, ra _es\�.� 7.0-� �jp_aD• �• CITY .Ir ,� koaE.eY • .4+- JP -32 J JP4i 7 p I,JP-4.'LA!(.' • '"\8390 ,� MIfO ti 639.0-- 411 `I:� J 15.7 JP -31 1^ 4 k /7/\. 615.7 JP -44 / -7y _ _ i 6770 BP1- /(j�/) BP -26'`/j A a c ❑ = BJOQ U60 Poe.. BO.O In 7 t3 i / Y '`� L7 �s�.._ - t -4e J z II eLACNHAWH /�4/((� '`'`t• �� "I ` ANN d�` JP -19 1 P / , \� 3- } i 8702 / i w/BP-2 % 625.0e} .0 Jp_3p 874.0 / 792-0 !/ 828.0 JP -10 872.7 / \ / } I794.0 •, 820.6 } BB1.0 I : "�,_ q Ji�IY`p BP -2B 090 L5.-12 cx 1 -e -I. 832,0 808.8 / 866Z i __ W' 8330 Cq7 B/'In 6_P 8660 ♦ JP -9 --J r' xs•:T' j. A JP -36- 8706 1JP=35 8200 - v L711 869-0 _J J -JA JP -34 / .xit B1Y,4 AIg. 6 -I-i2 8640 J-• 3L� / 8613 a-erg8900 J -r E POALE i/ 1 8950 I� P-27 :jam Iz/JP-317 JP -48 fie. li 7/� PATRICIf �•� i' i ��9 �J, BB6 139 Jnr, N II / % •'J 812 814. A ,� / iI i 875. 8758cY• li. 17�BO.S: Jp.g • t wl /l/A I 'l 9240 'ul BP -4 J �\ -- Ii:I rR/n"a 8200+N Pe /_29 li •I / / B9J0.0 iAll 870.0 _T `,�! % 1. IB BSao \//�� LP63 1?j),'.t'�l1 920,] 1' N 9100 k- c e A N '!,� rz• R e�41 BSBO _y� _��` I�l f1'I YI-1 �J-I ['! TyI•T'T-`-:-.-,.-.u,-_.-l_-� J-•• _._ w I-•• I'l s' e°/ o` 1- .$85.6 1884503 6 B -23 j I \ I /�BPi 1 I�: f -LP -42:: �'�J'i"ipJ.�%F, $r�i SF,i'�� P 9 BP -18 I ( /B860 II s]5o 80x. 7 « 7'•BB30�' I I }} $I2A / r� 4 _ • r2 1 .r•. �� . 11..•`��'�� yy 4 S` . ,: B e .) JJ(( I Al L Il n Y.LV��`L/A: nR i.rY 4^. r' 2AE'•I Ky t 901.0 I 'BP•16 1 �`r•JI1LJf y gyp.'.' .69.. 9/i B99gqpp �j/��,7 A•. I F _F .. _..: •Il AN]itJ 'D D' i2' •3'uja_ r•91TI.0-E•G _ ^i" I J FK'. ._ �^�p•� :�u+�' I:n "i LP -40 _- �� u0 L �jy�� • �� L- - S�b l�P-411J98.0-arP-SD `LP -61 R s Iii/tl/�'e I , I _ .-_ BP•IS p l �� J L.ap.JH L3 -x8 BUBO 90JA - �- i $9i� BB ° �, - ::�•lr;,i:;rlcr; � �e-7 $$$�..�dlSL : =. �+„S1J/�p •. •; -- -:_ :-_ . :��.., tea. LN• \ LP -54 •o n ... ,..P 13 �-- _ 8 I:o.l1 '"1 yl 6o9G _J LP -46 0 LEXINGTON PLACE 24 Unit Condominium 0 Models Units Gross Sq. Ft. Net Sq. Ft. 24S 6 502 472 24-1 7 709 673 24-2 11 916 874 Features Enclosed secure interior parking Automatic garage doors Appliances - range, oven, dishwasher, disposal, washer and dryer Energy circulating fireplace with glass doors Zoned radiant heat 2 baths in all 2 bedroom models Security system entrance Private lounge Individual lockers Inside bike storage Air conditioner Inside trash storage Low maintenance - exterior - same materials as used in single family - aluminum, wood, brick s� FIRPERty. IMSEABC1 -4 01 Pr,-1iMh7a1-Y P101 OF. LEXINGTON PLACE 7 lb --- FOR: 6 U.S HOME CORPORATION 3 IL 0 .-A 7 N A 41 7 /Z ...... izi ... " T I W,i�yl . (01®r. NZ WRG ARIM L LEY O A SSOCATES, INC A T R. 1• 6 7 A 4 DEVELOPMENT PLAN W: LEXINGTON PLACE Ip : U.S. HOME CORPORATION CIL WINDEN a ASSOCIATES, INC ;.IENDUTA J S — _— —l.a;...F.. J t id raa COMMERCIAL •r ^'"^' I ' �y/- —' PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RI :~/'. -; .`•p . RJ + / Ind /Ind. . a �� •>'� R) �; P , "'r� � � I :"'-h` I Intl \ Ind yy, CSC- -Ind. a .. • ' Q �-rr- R- -_ y 1�; R•�'.,, , - Ind29. raR� ' R41 >t�RI ¢ � E _R-0 17 P r R Jy NiA �}' �' .z I �sL Ral R-1 II _ C. R -1 i R!0 I .` 1 O � �"'^e•rdc ait-•, - �_ iI :, I RI "�C�, 2, �:, .'4 � p '. I 4I .,, R'A.0 r`•' �Nl}? I P P. R r ; w R -II R -II R -II M D l �i ,f J� R -III �= . LB ::I pp = I _I'. i' ] R -III RB (� CSC/GB/ R -III R-IIY R-I,� Rlr-�a,�' r _ �. ��la�� _ R -III . R-11 .. P R -II '.�`,' ��':I Z- - .,:,j::.�_p:vli •_� ® R -II 'r.....,� R -II'; ;w R -II R it i ..v.e , ,,,�%' ,TJl7 ,R I `':•/` . ti .I 1). R.I wJ t_ lJ F 3 FSI ^� :� CSC ;'� & k \ r(. 1• Si 7' • j p R-1 Q` IF x LB R -I R -II P'. R_II� (iR-II- R-1-.:. RII p` I ,I'' R -II yen _; t (� y r )� `<f t- s'Je e( VALLE ��ROSEMOUNT. / //I !� C] AAUGE, S=U, EIDE & 11mixR, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 9506 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA 55122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER Thomas Hedges City Administrator Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 March 9, 1982 RE: Efficiency Condominiums/Lexington Place Dear Tom: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 454.4224 i Recently we were asked to examine the legal aspects of restricting or allowing the construction of "efficiency" condominiums under 400 square feet. It appears that such a structure does not violate density requirements or any other part of Ordinance 52. It would appear that if this were an apartment building, units of this size would be allowable. Apartments and condominiums do fall under the same classification by ordinance. Thus it would be difficult to argue that a rental unit of 400 square feet should be allowed while an owned unit of the same size should not. That is not to say that such an argument is not possible. It is also worth noting Minnesota Statute Section 515A.1-106 which provides that "a zoning, subdivision, building code, or . . . ordinance . may not directly or indirectly . . . impose any requirement upon a condominium,/ . . , which it would not impose upon a physically similar development under a different form of ownership." Municipalities are allowed to regulate floor areas. McQuillin §25.142. However, such a zoning ordinance is subject to the unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious test. In other words, such a restriction must promote the public health, safety and welfare. 24 N.W. 2d 209. Esthetics may be an incident but cannot be the moving factor. The restriction cannot be based solely on the desire to preserve property values in the area. In conclusion, it appears that "efficiency" condominiums must be allowed under the present ordinance where zoning and density conditions are met. A change in the ordinance or denial of the plat would have to be based on adequate reason promoting the public health, safety or welfare. DGK:ras 66 Very�t-?ly yours, David` G. Keller APC Minutes February 25, 1982 r LEXINGTON PLACE - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of U. S. Homes Corporation and Orrin Thompson for preliminary plat approval for Lexington Place consis- ting of 84.62 acres and containing 28 condominium buildings for a total of 672 dwelling units was presented to the Planning Commission. The property is currently zoned R-4 located west of Lexington at the extension of Duckwood Drive. The density could range between 12 and 22 dwelling units per acre and the land use indicates north of Duckwood is R-3 (Mixed Residential) at a density of 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre. South of Duckwood is R-2 with a density of 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre. The gross density would be 7.9 dwelling units per acre and net density would be 9.17 per acre. He has Proposed to plat each of the 28 condominium buildings into a separate lot that would conform with the ordinance requirements. Each building would be 3 stories and contain 24 units each but with a mix of 6 studio units, 7 one - bedroom units and 11 two-bedroom units for a total of 24 units per building on a general basis. There would be 12 car garages at either end of each building and a request was made to reduce the parking from 2.5 to 2.0 spaces per unit. An earlier application had been submitted in 1981 for development on the same property and Orrin Thompson Homes had not pursued the proposal at that time. Bob Hoffman, Orrin Thompson, Bob Carlson and Chuck Winden appeared for the applicant. Studios would be priced under $40,000.00 and larger units at a higher price range. All would be for -sale units and would be approved for FHA financing. Tot lots would be included and two outdoor swimming pools. No tennis courts would be included in the proposal. An explanation of the ex- terior decor, landscaping, berming, etc. took place by representatives of the applicant and it was suggested by a number of neighbors present that Lexington should be upgraded in order to alleviate the heavy traffic problems even at the present time. Other neighboring property owners objected to being assessed for storm sewer improvements and Mr. Colbert stated the area bene- fited would most likely be assessed for storm sewer improvements. Mr. Carlson stated that child density would be about 0.18 children per unit. School children bus traffic was a concern of neighboring owners and compliance with the character of the other single-family residences in the area. It was suggested that a review of the storm sewer issue take place by the staff before council review. Mr. Thompson indicated that they expected to commence construction north of Deerwood Drive initially, and that all construction would be completed in 3 to 4 years. The grading plans are not complete but the berms and plantings are planned extensively on the project. There were concerns about resale to speculators and it was noted that there could be no control over such resale after the initial purchase by an owner -occupant. It was also noted that the number of units may change as sales occur, depending on the demand for specific types of units. The hearing commenced at 8:10- p.m. and at 9:25 p.m., Krob moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Cross easements and parking easements shall be granted on the lots which are served by common access for more than one dwelling unit and shall be reviewed by the City staff prior to recording. 61 APC Minutes February 25, 1982 2. The outside parking spaces shall be of 10 x 20 dimension and the parking areas shall be surfaced with concrete curbing around the perimeter of the parking areas. 3. Homeowner Association Articles and By -Laws for the development shall be submitted and reviewed prior to the final plat of the first stage. 4. Detailed landscaping plans shall be submitted and approved by the City and a landscape bond shall be required for an adequate amount and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 5. The preliminary plat shall be reviewed by the Eagan Park Committee and be subject to the Park Committee's recommendations. 6. The 2.5 parking spaces per ordinance requirement shall be reduced to one covered space and one parking, space per unit. 7. The preliminary plat shall be reviewed by Dakota County's Plat Commission and subject to their recommendations. 8. All other ordinance requirements shall be met. 9. Temporary service forsanitary sewer will be allowed through the Tomark Addition for this proposed development under the condition that the internal sanitary sewer system shall provide flexibility in allowing approxi- mately 60% of this development to be redirected in the future through the Windcrest trunk system to the south. 10. A storm sewer system connecting the proposed northerly pond (DP -18) with the pond in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue (DP -5) must be constructed as a condition of final plat approval. 11. A positive gravity storm sewer outlet to service the property south of Duckwood Drive must be constructed to Hurley Lake in addition to developing the internal ponding area referenced as JP -45- 12. The construction of a 44 foot, 9 ton collector street for the extension of Duckwood Drive to the east plat line shall be the responsibility of this development. 13. A 60 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Lexington Avenue. An 80 foot right-of-way shall be dedicated for Duckwood Drive. 14. All related trunk area assessments and lateral benefits from exist- ing trunk utilities shall be paid or levied at the time of final plat approval, if not listed as a pending assessment under an approved project by the City of Eagan. 49- APC Minutes February 25, 1982 15. Drainage/ponding easements approved by the City shall be dedicated of sufficient size to incorporate the required storage capacities as follows: (DP -18 - 11.2 acre feet for a controlled elevation of 876.0) (JP -45 - 7.8 acre feet with a controlled elevation of 890.3) 16. This development shall provide for a future storm sewer outlet from Pond JP -46 within the Carriage Hills Golf Course. 17. Ten foot drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated adjacent to all public rights-of-way and adjacent to private property. 18. A 5 foot concrete sidewalk should be installed along the north side of Duckwood Drive as a part of this development. An 8 foot bituminous trail - way should be constructed along the east side of Lexington Avenue within a 10 foot easement adjacent to the west line of this proposed plat. In addition, a walkway connection to the southeast corner of this plat should be provided as indicated by the Advisory Park and Recreation Committee. Those in favor were Hall, Srob, Mulrooney and Turnham. Wilkins and McCrea voted no. Member Wilkins stated that she felt that the City should not be a testing ground for up to 168 efficiency units in the 28 buildings. There were strong concerns regarding the inclusion of the studio units in the com- plex. 63 • . March 10, 1982 "MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION - PARKS DEDICATION - LEXINGTON PLACE On Thursday, March 4, 1982 the Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee made the following recommendation to the City Council regarding the parks dedication requirements for Lexington Place. That a cash dedi- cation, based on the number of units and existing cash fee at time of final platting, be made. And, that the developer provide tot -lot and swimming pools, as depicted on the preliminary plat; that the developer provide an asphalt trail along Lexington and a sidewalk along Duckwood. Further, that the developer provide an easement for a future trail on the cul-de-sac in the south portion of tFe development eastward to the eastern limits of the plat. This easement will provide for a potential future link with a park to be located further to the south and east of this plat. cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner Paul Hauge, City Attorney Judy Chaffee, Planning Secretary 6j 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Sixteen PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TOMARK SECOND ADDITION D. Tomark Development Company for a Preliminary Plat (Tomark 2nd Addition) Consisting of Approximately 25.3 Acres -- An application has been submitted to the City for preliminary plat approval of Tomark 2nd Addition consisting of approximately 25.3 acres located on Outlot A, Tomark First Addition. The applicant is requesting approval of the first building which is located on approximately 5 acres and contains 78 dwelling units. The public hearing was held before the APC at the February 25, 1982 regular meeting and the APC is recommending approval of the motions to the City Council. The first motion is to approve Tomark 2nd Addition subject to the conditions in the staff report with the understanding that two parking spaces per unit would be the parking requirement and that a fire access be provided on the south side of the building in order to be able to get access on the east side of the condominium building. The second motion the APC made was to approve the reduc- tion of the 2.5 parking spaces to 2 parking spaces on the .second building in the first addition with the understanding that addi- tional landscaping will be provided around the parking area. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Assis- tant's report, a copy of which is enclosed on pagesC�, through 7 for your review. For action that was taken by M APG, refer to minutes found on pages 7y through 50.1 Enclosed on page �j is the recommendation of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Uommittee concerning this proposed development. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the two aforementioned actions as recommended for approval by the APC, considering preliminary plat approval and a variance requiring additional landscaping around the parking area. 6 5- CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - TCMARK 2ND ADDITICN APPLICANT: TOMARK e�u�•: u LOCATION: NFA, OF THE NW, OF SECTICN 14 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 11, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVE OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for preliminary plat approval, Tomark 2nd Addition, which consists of approximately 25.3 acres located on Outlot A, Tomark 1st Addition. The applicant is only requesting approval of the first building which is located on approximately 5 acres and contains 78 dwelling units. Cn April 21, 1981, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of Tomark Addi- tion. At this time, the applicant was looking only for approval of the first phase which consisted of approximately 10.6 acres and contained 144 dwelling units. The remaining land was platted as an outlot. Since the April 21 City Council meeting, construction has begin on the two buildings which will each have 72 dwelling units. The application before the Planning Commission is for prelimi- nary plat approval of the first building in the Tomark 2nd Addition which origi- nally was part of Outlot A in the Tomark 1st Addition. SITE PIAN AND PLAT REVIEW due Tomark 2nd Addition preliminary plat consists of one building and three out- lets. The building contains 78 dwelling units and it would be on a 5 -acre par- cel. Outlot A consists of 5.4 acres, Outlot B, 4.2 acres and Outlot D, 9.2 acres. These three outlots will each have one building on it for a total of 222 dwelling units once the developers omplete the entire Tonark development. Until the de- velopers want to begin these phases of the developtrent, the three outlots will re- main as such. The proposed structure would be a 3 -story building and would contain 78 dwelling units. The building would be broken down into 6 three-bedroom units, 51 two-bed- room units and 21 one-bedroan units. The parking requirement for the building would be 195 parking spaces, of which 78 would have to be covered parking, either garage or underground. The applicant is proposing underground parking for the building. The site plan shows 68 open parking spaces and 88 covered parking spaces for a total of 156 parking spaces. The site plan is 39 parking spaces short of the 2.5 parking spaces per unit recuirernnt. (0 6 CITY OF EAGAN PREISIEVARY PLAT - TCMARK 2ND ADDITION FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE TWO Again, staff would like to point out that in conversations with other communi- ties, 2.5 parking spaces per unit seems to be in excess of the parking needs for rondominium units, and most communities have 2 parking spaces per unit as a standard requirement. In reviewing the lot coverage of the building, the applicant is proposing to cover approximately 29,185 square feet for a total of 13.48 lot coverage which is under the 208 lot coverage requirement. According to Ordinance 52, the lot size requirement for the proposed building is 5 acres. The applicant is meet- ing this requirement. In reviewing the site plan, the applicant has net all setback requirements for the building. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed landscape plan be provided for Iot 1, Block 1, Tomark 2nd Addition and an adequate landscape bond shall be provided and not re- leased until one year after the landscaping has been ocrrpleted. 2. The applicant is proposing 156 parking spaces which is 2 parking spaces per unit. A variance would have to be granted from the requirement of 2.5 parking spaces per unit. 3. The park dedication requirement shall be determined by the Park Committee. 4. All other applicable ordinance requirements shall be met. DMO/jach ENGINEERING RECCMMEN=ONS 5. Sanitary sewer and water main shall be extended to the south limits of this proposed plat for continuation and looping through the proposed development to the south. 6. A storm sewer system shall be constructed providing for the connection of the drainage basin in the southeast corner of Outlot A (DP -9) to the drainage basin in the northwest corner of Outlot D (DP -10). 7. The ponding easement for DP -9 as dedicated under the 1st Addition will have to be revised to conform with the approved grading plan for the proposed 2nd Addition to incorporate the 864.0 elevation. 8. Adequate easements to allow construction of sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer facilities to service the proposed lex ngton Place develop- ment to the south must be dedicated as a part of this final plat. 9. A Mailed grading and drainage plan must be reviewed and approved prior to final plat approval. 10. Trunk area storm sewer assessments must be assumed for Lot 1, Block 1 of the proposed 2nd Addition as a condition of final plat aporoval. G-7 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN PRE=NARY PLAT - TOIpm 2ND ADDITION . FEBR[IARY 25, 1982 PAGE THREE ADDITIONAL ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION CONCERNING TOMARK 1ST ADDITION The developers would like the Planning Camassion to consider another item concerning the second building of the Tomark 1st Addition. At the present time, the developers are proposing 2.5 parking spaces per unit for the build- ing. However, the developers are seeking a variance from the 2.5 parking spaces per unit requirement, and they would like to construct 2 parking spaces per unit. The developers would have additional landscaping and green area in- stead of the additional parking spaces. Staff would like to point out again that the 2.5 parking spaces per unit requirement seems to be in excess of the needed parking for condominiums. Attached axe exhibits illustrating the build- ing with 2.5 parking spaces per unit and 2 parking spaces per unit. 0 0 TO: THE PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 1982 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - TOMARK 2ND ADDITION (TOMARK DEVELOPMENT) The Public Works Department has the following comments for consideration of the above -referenced proposed plat: UTI=ES Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size and capacity to service this proposed development have been installed within Golfview Drive under Project 336, Contract 81-9 to the north line of the proposed 2nd Addition. These util- ities will have to be extended southerly to service this proposed building in Lot 1, Block 1 in addition to continuing to the south limits of Outlot A to provide for continuation and looping through the proposed Lexington Place adjacent to the south. Access to this proposed facility will be provided by way of Golfview Drive which was constructed wider Project 336B, Contract 81-10. It will require an extension of Golfview Drive along the entire frontage of Lot 1, Block 1 with future extension and ultimate connection to Lexington Avenue taking place within any subsequent development beyond the proposed 2nd Addition. It is felt that Golfview Drive intersection with Yankee Doodle Road will be adequate to handle Tomark 1st and this proposed building. The maximin length for access into this proposed building will be 6501. n••� a �••�r•a Topography is generally rolling topography with the drainage from this pro - Posed plat being directed toward the southeast corner into drainage basin DP -9 contained within the adjacent Carriage Hills Golf Course property. The outlet from Pond DP -9 is ultimately proposed to be directed to the pond near the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue within proposed Outlot D of Tomark 2nd Addition. This storm sewer outlet fran the southeast corner of this proposed development toward Yankee Doodle Road must be con- structed in conjunction with the proposed outlet from Pond DP -18 immediately to the south within the proposed Lexington Place development. This storm sewer extension must be constructed as a part of the Tc ark 2nd Addition. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY A ponding easement will have to be rededicated incorporating the 864.0 ele- vation for Pond DP -9 based on the final approved grading plan for the 2nd Addition. A standard 10' drainage and utility easement must be dedicated adjacent to all public rights-of-way and adjacent private property and cen- tered over all over common lot lines. A 60' right-of-way shall be dedica- ted to provide for the continuation of Golfview Drive adjacent to Int 1, Block 1 of the 2nd Addition. In addition, adequate utility easements will be required to allow for the installaticn of a storm sewer system connecting M Thomas A. Colbert February 25, 1982 Tomark 2nd Addition Page two Pond DP -9 and DP -10 and also providing for the continuation of sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer from DP -18 for the proposed Lexington Place Subdivision to the south. The necessary right-of-way for Lexington Ave- nue was dedicated as a part of the 1st Addition. ASSESSMENTS Trunk area sanitary sewer and water assessments Have been levied under Project 58 previously. However, trunk area storm sewer assessment must be levied as a condition of final plat approval or as a part of the future required storm sewer construction discussed previously. TRAILMY AMID SIDENALRS No additional sidewalk or trailways are required as a condition of this proposed development. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect of this metro pertaining to this proposed development at the Planning Commission Meeting of February 25, 1982. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TPG/jach '70 - -A,;.�;'a ��•" -.: r Vii,;. --,I _ novae o `,I - °'I -.. �[REFr .E EAGAN°j(fTER- / � Z'FfiLC:•.l_._ -�;.� /' � ID.k ..1.._' ;.'/ I= r I--\--` • ; 1D'A PILEY SENNDER'Jf I (�' I I• r? ! _•;,' p. , -. E•r -LONE OAX ROAD" -I Tr -868.0'- -i• 0 J 6E.,a-TT-F: r `l' I °•e rnooL I - I ^9 4.0.1; . 070.3 �"� "j-�,, •. /' � •p?� N � Ix' 876-0 FE� e t I .' I �•AE: ADaw V �PJj. ggD7a of n i i 4 Iz• 1 A jl'; E n I. B7F7 Oi �i/ /• r s I. L ARN .eo \ I I �2••_-C_k �. .6 �I E P B9ED1sO1' 7°M D710Y-19 SERV .88 / 0.0 870.00 l O 990.0 • `L ry i• I l.s< 8x77" 11 /T;. ` PARR < le' j�ADdnor / DP -6 Op 13 ' - :-e' I a 837.3 882,0 DP -II CEN7ER CP -1 i`% 1 8690:'' B§4. A0 9337 I�\� !ICE:,-. Ca: V CP=3 711.7Nf, rx. Da I B6?O �:./yl N IFJ _ ge°: 8400 DPr3 FDX 8500 /,%4r �.`' 042.0 -e BJ.o / n RIDGE 1.2 L ` .`,:''-� % i •//�// 868.0 LJL� r� r i:'T err-rrr�� : / / v4xeEd BZ9ALE eoaD11 L 3RO30 rvp D'A CO. RD /20 E-• E� SURREY CE.1 M 1 y yFFFLLL 2 CP -2 _ xl..0-0 ATR aDD` WESCOTT JI MIL 8200 XEIGXTS 4� 1 •4 1 8230�;c CP_I��/� /,�NV,/i Op -9© WESCOTT.�! I I RDG 022:71 2NDI� I"-.. IL/ j� - 88580 1� BYBD---r �� IE' GARDEN �� cP-6: i�%� p/ J-0 l li e BB�Z,3oF.r DP 7 D ply 8060' - ^�� // -- / wt� ' " 80.3 .O 877.01 C 7932 843.7 ,,� 100. PILA N�yks_f :r JP -1'J- �,� JP -46 J 806.0 ///,��BJOA_.:� I D866;0 IP B90 D• 892 '--\ / 'G .. 872.0 B9Z may. B� 3 X \ /�jz' :1IP-3 �Ir 7 a Jam/ �. I' BB8.3 I I- gyp. ?' /�' ii 39.p l/i , .AJP-47 �. / JP -42 O J/ BB70 L9: i �. % SI/.O 2 - _ - : 84T. x 887.1_/. 8'' Jal O o/�^? /'• I:e�sa,j,',.._ ` :'>>^em 1 "t 8871 moo_ �J9pg,g3 l C1Tr �y - .a: r : JP -32 , BB7.'O _ e+ nA}•r JP- 4. Win.' \839.° �d B '� 839.0_, '• li. +�,�94Pj :IJI 8115.7 JP -44 / , J' JP -31 4 BP -I yq BP-26'� 890.7 i 8770 _; r3 ..__YY'_. s-�, --- }•___ JT:: .'Ewe06.0 ^ern. JJ_ 1-Lt7�• B1 AHK'WMK i ! . K i� �i ,�f 870.2 / NIBP-2 182s.0 bt -a 672.7 874,0 1 r 794. r \YBA / J 20.8 t 872.7 / / 1784.0 ,�,• 820.8 t BBY.O 7wilTio/ 827. B \ BP+29 /\ 812.3' t i' JP -21 -. 808.0 JJAI 86208 fB.O v L4.-12 h 8322 ® Ta- R -IS u' B3QG 1 kj 8/1 0 in B_° 8660 ` JP -Oil -b 9 1.. =36- •}p-38. 2Y _.-__ _-23 _J / 16706 01A-33 a, D - V L_ 873.2 1869.4 \ J -ed JP -34 tlP-3 // 4z � Iz' 8724 � 1 `2. Q. _, i J t 8840 _ 3j�f• 801.3 : ( B Y - nS _ 2 8900 Ji' J -r FNOALE /i '' 8930 BP -27 Ix/ '1� -i� u.� r� q.P / / 1 882.0 j JP -37 JP -48 Jp-7: PATRICK BB6D LI / gQ 39 '3!•AN I� 1 BT',p0.B730b' 1 65.0 Jp-B. BP -2S /./ry �''��i.'-.^'tom 8172 •X ry / 924.0 W BSO , \11 `�' BY00 •," / 921] li •I i/ /�l I 11B-• 930.0 Ia 8800 LP- 63 (' ] �I�/, lir/18560 - ("{ :` ` I 940.0 c A 4 g Y,° I:• 2.8-a 4t7Lti •��, IT7 :Ir --B-k - BP -24.1 918.0:...,LT(. 924.0 0, �BP=S' r•I k '-44 '' e`i ° -•i LP 874.0..1) 1' �•, I I '-''. � / 887.5. fN1�'0. a4B B m°O�• .•�At. C-. %,835 0� ;� BPI ,E: tti LF -4. ccMpREMNS1w SMR4 SLUM PLAN 28 �� 31.3 BP -18 1 n8860 I" T •833 O V3L3 e�z.7 ~ �+Be9A� E COI F e9Y� -7/ Ro ' R I B B.a sl. rti.,.. xr.,., •ggp-99 ^<.�\ gp_6 Ir 3 I f�•I,'I{1". �•1:_ I•li�{(/.J /.L -7 r'L i,:n4� �AuiLD f3Sl-\ 9/IO� .. 880.! �''\`J'� II-: _r YwY'i(-w:u1 •._4_ _ ' a+�� 1 9030 I •y.� ByP8-I6 ;� . GoL3eVllil v902.� �•.�...�� -_J�7 � _•L --;T J:,.r,l �y _ LP -40 __ Ma a' 1 ..._.6P•IS - �' L"s.ie� . {<P-41• ,SCI : -.- 890.0 -_a5P-SO ._-LP-6 "6JA, )� g99p ,, SLI+:M - 8840 1 907G .y�//�g9ypg'a : \. r'A n�.J •�:;KP: I BBBA 903D. ; ; _ T .10 � ww}�•; 4. .i•-.Lx•�•f 1� O\� ,•BP..6.PP.1\. ._I` Lr-34�'. !10900., LP -32-- „I LP -46 '. / 1 .. i✓ � `� 898 0 -I 6732 • 1 °a° aa• .N low site BATA art. w. rna■ Yraw .. Iaau r n1} rr,n• wn a ole I Ir./IICU•I AAOIA It. BAIsi11A LOr of �LI IILILAt OA 113311 •°OKI ADAM ' 1.1 ac.1011 118LA24114 ION I/ LIAIBAUI A19 1322.01`I`'OCILE it,Alto � •Yra 28---( YANKEE- Dp@OJy{ RY.i,AS YY Na.A11 BeIN1 Leu Ala IItLBAIAA 1113111\ Sia I 1 . AND110101 to 1011 /( IoUnp Naive) ' 14.3 AS. 19IIIIITIIL 114 AY. OI BAla0lI11YY1 1,0 DURING 3fALL1 PII AY.1 si11lYA BAf IItGI ta7111I IY, NII Pet 1 if Oil AVILDII/I .. ,. / . A 11 OIOOl 1 1'IleleeN tl Cl•ITT MP — .. .. ... II • 1 IIOLOOI 11 1 Ifat00l ...-r•N—.. ! N -,• 1 Stoical j,,,,. L I1110o1 It Is. ' I aYiliiwY.a iwii.A,n 11Nr.r, I/ /N. I 11 IH • •' Nr ua , Lull 14 BIT. At. oY/AC __.. 1 to 4.8 Iba 111 A01. A [ . 11 1.1 11.1 131 AII, 1 Ar 114 1 BA w f 1 is IJ 11.1 Nae BAI. L...L_ --�--- -�-- J BA. A./.0 In 11.1 Me 11l A01. IAG. 1•, r.L,. A. iA L AAA 34.4 Me t YO mm,g On•nY urs.,.•. µaiM w �t 1:C'L':ITY i!:!Y•N89' COUNTY NIG N 1 r I.�I.,Wr r.�.lwWr W z W a W • VIM". ' .sir• M • H• °a° aa• .N I.uiY - art. w. rna■ Yraw .. Iaau r n1} rr,n• wn a ole P8 r,'iA7KcE 1322.01`I`'OCILE it,Alto � •Yra 28---( YANKEE- Dp@OJy{ RY.i,AS YY Sia I 1 . idIs 1A W 1. ' J IIYO ANAP 6.0 OUTLOT D 0.8 .lc. a I 5 e w •1 �� °41TLOr / Ito., 0 ,Ir LOT ! BLOCK I 0.G.1S A N � N R W t 1 � j y w 2 WWW .'Z—• W W � w ^ 1 N 1... z Z rQ1 —1 LL = J OunoT B -i ` ; fSAr-9 O AVAe. A 1 I -- -- ( _our..y �i , LY.Y.. - 0q,0A. r A u a► •AA�N.Ll.— "SVI t�urrgwrr.r•awrur� �. j I ■[YL°N I� _ 41, -7A •w 1324.68 �I\.,.,•r.r ww.Py N 89,12,511"W M• .Nrin/ I w,wr Naw .rsM NI ,� .... rrr ,,..,,,,•„ TOMARK 2ND ADDITION. YSHEET � .�.rrw.ri, �A P24CRIPTION - OYTLOT A' TOYAIII( IST ADDITION . I OF PRELIMINARY PLAT s i I DR0.AW , 1LA� _I i SHEET UTILITY PLAN of s A UTILITIES 'LEGEND 3XINT1N11ANITANT 19 WON �9�►�--r• 111eTWo /TOWN •ARRA —N—R—R, aAINTWo RATa1NAW �6-0►RO►0926 SANITARY BIWIN —6 ) O�►• OROrO/Ne ITORN OIran ►ROr01NORAT/ARAN — 1111 DATA It.1 LAe11 •t. lutluetn mnue eou v un151o1 a m111 "SOLD 51111 1.1 Al. er low 111511:511 AOe e/ ll1un81 511 runt e000Ll 1040 ue InLURu4 1111111 Age u01O118 .ON 0{ 4W11111I 0111Ll 11.1 It. 1911811TIAL 4N u. Or tole0Rb1YR4 LO ru1186 IIALLI 111 oY.1 OI51NYR 01{ IIALI Ln[Nq 6Y. 1111 r11 1 11001 IY1L81141 1 . 1 Ole•oom 1 . I IIo160R 11 • 1 elDtoom 11 1 5101064 1_• 1 51oloDA JL. 1 1981064 tl /Y. )6 DY. MAU JLL 1I1, At, WA 1 11 4.1 16.0 It1 100. It /.1 11.1 IIT ADD. 11 6.6 11.1 too 108. 1l. 6.M Lu Lu 51.6 ua All. 1 444 14.0 11.6 1 Q CL ,L) ? Wi J �• �F— Os >1�aJy W R W It Q � J Z J O: W FP, O• ,TJV r D 7'w a a j03a 0 IL r .n O •O _ h/MIf /. Valiwl. � IIVI/ ?A ENUU FA •NT - • -! ✓ / . GB Ind" /--- —.. ._ ;. -- - - ': I - .1 : Jnd COMMERCIAL / •�__' -• . R I 'i J . • - •PLANNED DEVELOPMENT • - -�'� ''r °'' •{"��: � 7 Ind �..c � 4 '�^�� / R. R!.I �:.,� end ..m: . ,e, 71GB ,•• I JllIN \ ♦ xa�: I'� Q. n. I ..,RIII I . :A. P _� ..•,�� Ind .. — aY. P ✓ ..;� NB R-111 DIµ � -'Ind. .� '.:Y }r c -r •• , r i-+^~ o o �- R -II - Rill v jam. d vi I :.''2s*'a•'� � _ RI.1 – -- � '"- R-1' � R -I1 R-IIC% �� 'A� •,5 H5Y' �— r�srrdo`6.. ' IN Ru D V P R -II % P �y I.:: R IL�R-II R-olll 0 -11� .,91 N`., �N�pel, '�•n.�„ : II �� M'::;Ed I-• I �.� 'll _ J�1 i A R•III RB i.r R -III _ R-IIY' R -III : 41., ie �' o> ' CSC/GB/ �1 s . R -Ir RI.�f I .rt�� 1 f R -III �,,_: I p h y�.. W. z, { r R-11 I R-11 '� �w •R-II�'I.� ® R -II wh _ -:,. i'' 4�r�r� '�� •u� l "�; ...�,� µ •�•�r.FLI 3 R•1 „! •tij CSC �.:. t Ik ,� I. `.�• - 7LB R_l P SI' �raa R G R -I f' RLI :., Py1a�11yq o .041 4 �T ^ P R -II � R -II GbLF R41rl :auf. WILT W.I _y 1 ^,I y 1 ruQ1 .,t"'u3;Y ..."Fe''® 1�•.,",.,^..s.iP %'° !.r+^. ..,�— q :•r,) �.� t! '.1eiS•7 U`,., Txr J1�` — COO -7 7 VALLEY ° II ROSEMOUN�' / TOMARH 2ND ADDITION - PRELDU NARY PLAT The hearing regarding the application of Tomark Development Company for preliminary plat approval of Tomark 2nd Addition was convened by the Chairman. The Addition would consist of 25.3 acres located on Outlot A, Tomark 1st Addition with the first building containing 5 acres and 78 dwelling units. Construction has commenced on the first two buildings in the 1st Addition and it is intended that each of the Outlots for the 2nd Additionwould include an additional building. The proposed structure would be three stories with 78 dwelling units with 6 three-bedroom units, 51 two-bedroom and 21 one -bedroom units. The applicant is proposing underground parking for the building and the site plan shows 68 open parking spaces and 80 covered parking spaces, being 39 parking spaces short of the 2.5 parking spaces per unit. A request is being made to reduce the parking to 2 parking spaces per unit. Jim Hill and representatives of Tomark appeared for the applicant. They indicated that there would be more green space provided if the reduction of the parking spaces would be allowed with a 17 foot island in the parking lot. The sale price would be approximately $50,000.00 for one -bedroom, $60,000.00 for two- bedroom and $70,000.00 for three-bedroom. There were no objections from the audience. There were pool and tennis courts designed for a cluster of three buildings. Projected density is 12 units per acre in the over-all project. Zoning is R-4 and the Comprehensive Guide Plan indicates R-3 use. The appli- cant also requested reduction in the parking spaces per unit in Phase II which is now under construction, to 2.0 spaces per unit. There would be one Home- owners Association for all six buildings under the flexible Condominium Act provisions. McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat according to the following conditions: 1. A detailed landscape plan be provided for Lot 1, Block 1, Tomark 2nd Addition and an adequate landscape bond shall be provided and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 2. Authorizing 2.0 parking spaces per unit. 3. The park dedication requirement shall be determined by the Park Committee. 4. All other applicable ordinance requirements shall be met. 5. Sanitary sewer and water main shall be extended to the south limits of this proposed plat for continuation and looping through the proposed development to the south. 6. A storm sewer system shall be constructed providing for the connec- tion of the drainage basin in the southeast corner of Outlot A (DP -9) to the drainage basin in the northwest corner of Outlot D (DP -10). -79 7. The ponding easement for DP -9 as dedicated under the 1st Addition will have to be revised to conform with the approved grading plan for the proposed 2nd Addition to incorporate the 854.0 elevation. 8. Adequate easements to allow construction of sanitary sewer, water and storm facilities to service the proposed Lexington Place development to the south must be dedicated as a part of this final plat. 9. A detailed grading and drainage plan must be reviewed and approved prior to final plat approval. 10. Trunk area storm sewer assessments must be assumed for Lot 1, Block 1, of the proposed 2nd Addition as a condition of final plat approval. 11. Fire lane exits shall be required between the buildings to provide access to the back of each of the buildings. All members voted in favor. Hall then moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend to the Council that it allow a reduction in the parking spaces per unit on the Phase II building to 2.0 spaces per unit with the under- standing that the area eliminated for parking will be maintained as green space. All voted yea. • • March 10, 1982 MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: ADVISORY PARKS F, RECREATION COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION - PARKS DEDICATION - TOMARK 2nd ADDITION On Thursday, March 4, 1982 the Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee's recommendation to the City Council that Tomark 2nd Addition fulfill its park dedication requirements through a cash dedication based on the number of units and fees at time of final platting. cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner Paul Hauge, City Attorney Judy Chaffee, Planning Secretary t� • 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Seventeen REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ALPHA ADDITION E. Roger & Judith Urban for Rezoning from A to I-1 District and Preliminary Plat for Alpha Addition Consisting of Approximately 12 Acres and Containing One Lot -- Two (2) applications were re- ceived from Roger and Judith Urban: (1) a rezoning from A to I-1 consisting of 12 acres and (2) a preliminary plat for Alpha Addition consisting of approximately 12 acres and containing one lot. A public hearing was held before the APC at the February 25, 1982 meeting and the APC is recommending denial of the rezoning and preliminary plat because it may create a spot zoning and was not consistent with the land use plan. For additional information on this item, please refer to the Planning Assistant's report found on pages -1thathrough Q For additional information regarding the action t was taken y the APC, refer to page _cam_ for a copy of the minutes. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the Advisory Planning Commissions recommendation to deny the rezoning and preliminary plat for Alpha Addition. WN • 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZCNING AND PRELIMINARY PIAT - ALPHA ADDITION APPLICANT: ROGER & JUDITH URBAN LOCATION: PART OF THE SFi'n OF THE M OF SECTION 25 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 17, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVID M. OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT The first application submitted is for a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to I-1 (Light Industrial District) consisting of approximately 12 acres. The second application submitted is for a preliminary plat, Alpha Addition, con- sisting of approximately 12 acres and containing one lot. LAPID USE AND ZONING Presently, the site is zoned A (Agricultural). The land use for the proposed site is R-2 (Mixed Residential). The proposed rezoningchange bo I-1 (Light Industrial) is inconsistent with the land use plan and would reoui.re an amend- ment to the Eagan Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN AND REVIEW The subject parcel consists of approximately 12 acres and the applicant is pro- posing to construct a 2,400 square foot office building for a computer sales business. The subject parcel is bordered on the west by the Chicago, Milwau}:ee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, on the east by the City of Inver Grove Heights and the south by Cliff Road. The proposed site plan indicates a 1 -story, 2,400 square foot office building which will be used for a small computer sales business. The building would con- sist of 600 square feet of warehouse space and the remaining 1,800 square feet would be used for office space. During normal business hours, there would be approximately 5 people working in the office. The lot coverage of the proposed building is considerably under the 35% require- ment set forth in the Eagan Zoning Ordinance. Of the 12 acres of land on this site, only 2,400 square feet will be covered by the building which calculates to less than 1/28 of lot coveraqe. CITY OF EAGAN REZONING AND PIUMdMINARV PIAT - ALPHA ADDITION FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE TVJD The parking requirement for the building acoording to Ordinance #52 would require one parking space for each 150 square feet of net leasable floor area. With the 1,800 square feet of office space, the required parking spaces are 12, which is the number being proposed by the applicant for his building. The access to this site is proposed to be taken off of Cliff Road. The site plan has accounted for the future widening and upgrading of Cliff Road. The applicant has proposed a 30' access and 24' drive aisles throughout the parking area. This site plan is. also indicating 10' x 20' parking stalls. Therefore, the entire parking area is in compliance with all requirements of the Eagan Zoning Ordinance. In reviewing the site plan, it appears as if all setback requirements are being met by the applicant. At the present time, there are no utilities located on this site. However, the applicant is proposing to install all necessary utilities on the site by himself. The site plans do indicate where the proposed drainfield and septic tanks and al- so where the proposed well will be located. Because the subject parcel is adjacent to the boundaries of Inver Grove Heights, staff has contacted that City's Planning Department to discuss this proposal. At the present time, this land is zoned Agricultural in Inver Grove Heights, and the Inver Grove Heights land use guide plan shows this area to be R-0, which are minimum 5 -acre lots. The Inver Grove Heights Planning Department anticipates no problems should this building be constructed as proposed. Staff has received from the applicant a sketch of the parcel outlining what it would look like should this area ever be developed further in the future. However, the applicant has no plans for developing this area any further. He is simply providing a preliminary sketch of the area if development does take place in the area. If approved, the preliminary plat and planned development shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comment because the plat abuts a County right-of-way. 2) The plat should be subject to all easements as required by City staff. 3) A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 4) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted prior to final plat approval. 5) The applicant will provide all necessary utilities and not object to fur- ther assessments when the utilities are installed in the area. 6) Detailed plans shall be submitted to City staff in regard to how the septic systems will be installed, and the septic systems shall meet all the build- ing code requirements and PCA req_uirarents. 1?1 CrrY OF EAGAN REZONING AND PIUMMI ]ARY PLAT - ALPIIA ADDITION FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE TBFEE 7) The plat shall be subject to the Park dedication requirements. 8) All other applicable ordinances shall be followed. Dim/jach- o- � i��• � •iau i is � � r 9) A 65' half right-of-way for County Road 32 (Cliff Road) with a 10' roadway and utility easement shall be dedicated as a part of this plat. 10) A ponding easement incorporating the 916.0 elevation shall be dedicated as a part of this plat. TAC/jach PRELIMINARY PLAT OF =' ALPHA ADDITION IRE #'� .�/•.N. '�•'�tt:r�iSCALE: 1 OICN 100 FEET- lliyta-ECliff ... ld? cu..ff aaa: r = ! r ��' l 3ht•�;. Fount mc•,1�: yetwltaee /7 • • '� • PMM.ea U:A n�: T.1 (:16't LY telai1 *� �''- . a� �. .:a,•ia. _ :6nu I...a a.,.e Act, e- .. . / -•.` - Tat p.et e! t-. 3eutrrut :carter a/ the J.RbeC: 1 ' ( I 1� /, • = of S.et.cr. s. yvL'• LI• Fay. !l; .a¢e•a ]^un:r, 'C.meeot 311.y ..tera ef r. ..Steel ,ft e.• .y 11 r e! L.e :� _ Z e rnlcue a.a Y.. °avl Y tae: fl• eal treeH e eovtn ill. i..6 6 r.a of am .ut t:6. �.•6 tut :mreofer Svreeper::.J"rtz 161S • •e•rev :��. - r -toerea. 1S;: 1.•t+ Ste..t •e!rk - { J S.• �L ire 1 ./ ; �. ;�'. �.>. }. . 2 erotn: b eiv unl herr u..r ane *,ter 't. i 61 — _ f' -♦ .:�'. ';. JS... .. la+. etvna Una are a-.1.J. .. _.. - >�. td. 396, • \ tihS� r �'•'ti Z J� •t16� � _ / � L L61i . 1 PROPOSED GRADING PLAN FOR- ALPHA ADDITION Owner: Roger Urban Scale : 1 inch = 50 feet Prepared By: Delmar H. Schwanz Elevations shown are proposed Dated: 1-28-82 -11---Denotes proposed drainage Revised 2-9-82 Proposed building use: fl1800 square feet of office space 12 parking spaces 600 square feet of warehouse space. .100, 101 MfS� YRS SO'#'S\C P (,�1 ,V,6 �j✓ —938—PRpP°y /� Q o 940+N 9°z � -942 °9 c 9"�. 10. i 4r 60 30 Ty J F PROPOSED 6 / BUILDING - �- `7� Q I ST FLOOR 5. It 941 I 9405 - 910J8,; 400, 941 Ll FBF ILI 945 - !1 � r �' 1 I ... .... .. . a q . 1aa 50 ur Z Acres rand V SCALE: I INCH • 10( or Section 25, Township 27, Range 2'. 0 r 4i Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul & Pacific ... .... .. . a q . 1aa 50 ur Z Acres rand Legal Description: SCALE: I INCH • 10( or Section 25, Township 27, Range 2'. 0 lying easterly or the easterly right 4i Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul & Pacific o south 313.06 feetof..Ahe east.208.ZC Z. f Surveyor: Delmar R. S�hwanz 7'. Reg, No. 8625 1. Address: 2978 145th Street r LU Rosemount, imn.' Owc-or-Leveloper: hoger Urban Some dimensions "a scaled.; :7 Dated: January 28. 1982 1007 Cliff Road Eagan vh. 55123 1 '171 ;4kv Present Zoning.- Agriculture v': r r (j) Proposed Zoning: 1.1 (Light rndustr! Area: 1d.29 GM53 Acres -.'7 ... .... .. . a q . 1aa 50 ur Z CLIFF Acres rand Legal Description: That part of the Southeast Quarter --c or Section 25, Township 27, Range 2'. 0 lying easterly or the easterly right 4i Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul & Pacific o south 313.06 feetof..Ahe east.208.ZC Z. f Surveyor: Delmar R. S�hwanz 7'. Reg, No. 8625 1. Address: 2978 145th Street r LU Rosemount, imn.' Rotes: On site sanitary sewer and _ws Some dimensions "a scaled.; :7 Dated: January 28. 1982 1 '171 ;4kv r z CLIFF OAD.,'i-. 7'. 1 '171 ;denWi4 HTS • - y'. RB . TItr 'J GB v a u ••o: y� Ind I �� 1 :°•:.- /^!'•?. ,Ind;: T COMMERCIAL '! ^_--�-i •••w• {I iii; �. '�+ /'. !:/ PLANNED DEVELOPMENT -- .J .f,• .:��/ i Ind ........�.._,. �� I'�'�-' • Yni: �I i° ®RIII RIII i { v9 ��. _ •— r R-tl R-I� ,w...n� Ind xwn..........wT C''—�.'?" I ± - i .�..•... . _ RI _ �t:4T. ., _ _ Ind. � `C RIII+a. /•� , .; ✓,-�`S © .t . IIC��r—€ i I In ..•I Ind � '' - R-II P •' NB I L8� RNI R•I� O—�� I� RII xa y CSC- _ / p 9• _ _ n nd. r Y �Fenro. '•'r _.� �u� " I Ft's' . i r ' � � 1 - -?- R,II :'P: ., n s v •5T _ = 5: :., : N . RIII ,vr,. R-_I �R{.,. E °7 .p 7 a r a•.- RtT" RII - R- N p � R-1 R II si�k'•�. - J_� ;9R1 'gym -w ^ I ,r: P. [E •R-II-.. -� C --.a .Irr71 �;w.`, C,p • R-II.—�.. R-IIt R-III d_• R-Il %I fr �sM I N NS -I. r R-III RB 7' RIII �• )ra+:.'.1 �� • _ i-........ �.. R-III R-IR RIII R13�i' `•.i�.:�j,�i� ' iLT;. R41 CSC/GB/ � _. -J LJ LdP R_II 2 R-II �r., R-11114 'ri w •, /I N` w"AWN, .•.:'''I+' = 1 � - R•I '. Ni P I_.FFI RI t tm� 5-o •n }^ 3 J4n91 .�I CSC l'v ik 7 LB�•.. ,. : R I' Cg R-II R-II R-II- /7llvl ' ^I R-1R-II • f: s F�a iP I <.' , -° R-II •• . 3 i4 ` 4 /�.�Y 4 �� •u.il _ fit';•.-- '{."tiy„L,I r , e,rr P •vxT _yµxi 7 �y8p vs• L7 C VALLEY - i! I ROSEMOUN_ 17I A m • - AUDITOR'S SUED 042 , - r- I _ 2 A A 11 2 4400 'PK PK C P R -I -�� 460 CO 1-- `" Sar 4 '' ,��>•.�.:: � ;� : ., -- PARC Grov J .• 1` A Me 48 0 P Kple i)> -to- Nit=: aJ! r`J,�•? ,� 1. vi A LI - MAROTZf(E �� j�,t;;. �,•, ADO. Z4 � •;A3::L'J'y, .ra',••i'-''giro•`,. '') c' .i�•i: N U �0 R23W 5000 0 APC Minutes February 25, 1982 0 ALPHA ADDITION - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of Roger and Judith Urban for rezoning from (A) Agricultural to I-1 (Light Industrial) and preliminary plat approval of Alpha Addition, consisting of 12 acres was convened by the Chairman. Mr. and Mrs. Urban were present and indicated the location which is currently zoned A (Agricultural) and land use proposed for R-2 (Mixed Residen- tial) is located near the northeast intersection of Cliff Road and Highway #3. The property is bounded on the west by railroad right-of-way and on the east generally by Inver Grove Heights with 5 acre parcels proposed. The proposal is for a 2,400 square foot office building for computer sales business. Mr. Urban stated there would only be a small amount of traffic generated with 5 employees. Don Holtz, an adjacent neighbor to the southeast appeared and objected to industrial use and also indicated that the pond area would reduce the total buildable area. Marvin Fritz, an owner across Highway #3 to the west, asked about the precedent issue and there was one other objector to the Industrial zoning. Mr. Urban stated he has owned the land for about a year and a half. He has proposed that there be a septic tank and water well and there would only be a requirement of a slight revision to the Comprehensive Plan and compliance with WPC 40 for the septic tank. Inver Grove Heights zoning is R-0 for 5 acre minimun residential lots. It was noted that the multiple unit could not be constructed on the property with ceptic tank, which is the land use described. It was suggested that possibly a lower density zoning such as Commercial use might be feasible on the site. Turnham moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend denial of the application for rezoning and preliminary plat based upon the reason given above. All voted in favor. // 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Eighteen 0 OVERHILL FARM FIRST ADDITION FINAL PLAT F. Overhill Farm First Addition Final Plat Approval -- The pre- liminary plat for the Overhill Farm First Addition was approved on February 3, 1981. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval have been adhered to and the installation of public streets and utilities has been ordered for installation under Projects 321, 326 and/or 332. The development agreement has been fully executed by the developer and all other requirements have been complied with. A copy of the final plat is enclosed on page 9--,> ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the final plat approval for the Overhill Farm First Addition and autho- rize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute final plat documents and resolution. im I-.0 W I OVERHILL FARM FIRST ADDITION O DOW"ItS IJE WE ST b INCH IaON pipe MOYUMEHTI DET AND MA0E60 DT RE41510A- TION ND. 10795. NNLDN OTHEO.WISS SHOWN. THE EAST LINE M THE - KI'aor IHe ew4,sm.s9.sf•fq IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A SaA01YQ Op 50.12190'0 ��—DOIJOTES •EIGHT ep ACCESS• DEDICATED TD DIJfOTA COYHTV OWMNa uO YTYIT Ki Nfllt wY SNOwN TNUa b 11 11 11 YIY4 is 1EIN WIDTH ANO S iO4 TEE F.CT ET LINEA 9 FLET IN WIDTH Nb AD. jpIM084 LOT LINES UYLEM ,OTHRRTHaawlaE nIDD:ATaD. 6lNCH MAYA ELEVATION 939.77 TOP NUT OF HYDEANT M 'me S.W. OUADEANT aF 000D Saab ND CUFF Gail, • ECLLe 1N FEET a !e Ne Ne laa J 1 INCH a 00 FEET —SECTION 15.T77, Fii Ialai �' M•i � LOCdTIONa fMAPN Amodehd $III vAv and EJIgkwi 10. YIE: ONEET i OF i ENEETE Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Nineteen AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE - APPLEBAUMS G. Amusement Device License for Applebaums Food Store -- An appli- cation was received to consider two (2) amusement devices at the Applebaum Food Store located in Cedarvale Shopping Center. The amusement devices proposed at that location include a frogger and centipede. The amusement devices will be located within Applebaums proper so when the store is closed, the machines will not be opera- ble. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny an amuse- ment device license for Applebaum Food Store to allow two (2) amuse- ment devices. Hi 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Twenty 40 RESOLUTION REGARDING FUNDING/I-35E A. Resolution to Consider Funding for Proposed I -35E -- The City Administrator attended a meeting at the Department of Transportation Building in the office of Commissioner Braun on March 4, 1982. The purpose of the meeting was two fold, to discuss proposed legis- lation regarding proposed I -35E and, more specifically, the Pleasant Avenue Corridor; and the second reason which directly affects the City of Eagan was MnDOT's priority decision on funding various road projects in the State of Minnesota during 1982. Apparently, MnDOT is proposing, for budget cutting reasons, to reduce the 1982 -1983 construction budget by $100,000,000. $25,000,000 will be cut back in Duluth and most of the remaining dollars will be cut back on work proposed in Washington and Dakota Counties. The amount for Dakota County totals approximately $52,000,000. The amount of money earmarked for construction in this budgetary allocation period for the biennium July 1981 through June 1982 is $109,245,000. Even with the delay of current letting dates to the rescheduled letting dates as indicated on the proposed schedule (a copy is enclosed on page 9& ), the I -35E opening should not be delayed. Commissioner Braun explained that there is approximately thirteen billion dollars in trust money tied up in Washington that is ear- marked for interstate construction. Commissioner Bruan encouraged the City of Eagan and business leaders who were in attendance in this meeting to contact federal legislators in an effort to free up this money, earmarking a portion of it for completion of inter- state work in Minnesota, and more specifically Eagan and Dakota County. A resolution has been prepared by the City Administrator for consideration by the City Council and a copy is enclosed on page q . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a reso- lution to be submitted to our United States congressional delegation regarding a request to appropriate federal funds earmarked for interstate completion of I -35E. 9 S� ' CITY OF EAGAN • RESOLUTION LEAS, a regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on March 16, 1982, at 6:30 P.M.; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan City Council strongly desires the most expeditious ompletion of I -35E in Dakota County; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes the ompletion of I -35E will have a positive and substantial impact on economic growth due to business ex- pansion in the City of Eagan and Northern Dakota County; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has been committed for approximately 27 (twenty-seven) years in maintaining a corridor alignment for the oafple- tion of I -35E through its c= comity; and WHEREAS, many businesses employing between 500 and 5,000 employees have located in the City of Eagan through the assurance of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Department that I -35E would be completed on a regular schedule; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan understands there is approximately $13 billion dollars in a Federal Interstate Trust Fund that has not been ear- marked for specific interstate completion; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Eagan City Council requests that Federal dollars be earmarked to the State of Minnesota frau the Fed- eral Interstate Trust Fund to complete the remainder of the I -35E corridor in Dakota County on the schedule that is consistent with the Minnesota Department of Transportation. DATED: Mardi 16, 1982 CITY COUNCIL CITY CF EAGAN BY: ATTEST: BY E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk State of Minnesota County of Dakota City of Fagan Beatta Blomquist, Mayor I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan at a regular meeting on March 16, 1982. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk Y�l SPECIAL NOPE: This Resolution, along with a cover letter fran the City Administrator will be sent to Minnesota's Washington delegation consisting of Senators Boschwitz and Durenberger and Congressman Hagedorn. Copies will also be sent to Governor Quie, Ccumissioner Braun, Minnesota State Senator Knutson and Representative Rodriquez. �1 Prepared March, 1982 PROPOSED SCHEDULE MAJOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION IN DAKOTA COUNTY STATE FISCAL YEARS 1982-83 (JULY 1981 - JUNE 1983) Current Resched. Biennium - Estimated Letting Letting Resched. Dollars T.H. Location Type of Work Cost Date Date Delay Delayed 35E Cedar Ave. to Grading, Brs. 9,350,000 4-82. 11-82 7 mos. Blackhawk Rd. }•�:r.,:.,:..,•,z... .,_, 35E Blackhawk Rd. Grading, Brs. 7,115,000 3-83 11-83 8 mos. 7,115,01 . - .. to CSAH 30 - 35E CSAH 30 to Grading, Brs. 14,410,000 3-83 11-83 8 mos. 14,410,0: CSAH 31 35E CSAH 31 to Grading, Br. 8,690,000 11-82 11-83 12 mos. 8,690,01 CSAH 26 35E CSAH 26 Inter- Grading, Br. 4,980,000 6-82 --- No Delay change -_- - 35E Mendota Hts. Rd. Grading, Br. 2,500,000 4-82 --- No Delay - - -- - to TH 110 - 35E Cedar Ave. to Surfacing, 2,935,000 3-83- 11-83 8 mos. 2,935,01 CSAH 30 Misc. 35E CSAH 26 Inter- Surfacing, 1,430,000 4-83 8-83 4 mos. 1,430,01 - change Misc. 35E Mendota Hts. Rd. Surfacing, g 2,080,000 4-83 1-84 9 mos. 2,080,01 TH 110 Misc. 77 140th St. to Grading, Br. 3,910,000 6-82 --- No Delay TH 35E -' - - 55 Blue Gentian Rd. Grading, Surf., I 1,900,000 3-82 -- No Delay to S. Jct. TH Signals 149 ...... _ 149 TH 494 to N. Jct Grading, Surf, 800,000 4-83 6-83 2 mos. 800,0( TH 55 494 TH 55 to 0.5 Mi. Grading, Brs. 16,350,000 4-82 --- No Delay s , W of TH 149 6-82 • ' --- - 494 TH 55 to 0.5 Mi. Surfacing, 4,760,000 4-83 1-84 9 mos. 4,760,0( ...:.::rir:-:a;izs.;`:,=:k.,.ii.'r`.'•';;_; W of TH 149 Misc. 494 0.5 Mi. W of to Grading, Br., 9,815,000 4-83 6-83 2 mos. 9,815,0( 0.5 Mi. E of Surf., Misc. •'x..k`a*us^' y x...wCti &,:3?.,Y'';w:ga.i TH 149 494 Babcock Trail to Grading, Brs., 12,605,000 3-83 --- No Delay So. St. Paul Surf., Misc. 494 24th Ave. to Grading, Brs., 13,700,000 9-82 --- No Delay - Minn. River Br. Surf., Misc. �- (Henn. Co.) *i Misc. Projects 5,615,000 • (Safety, Br., - Resurf., etc.) TOTALS (does not include 109,245.000 52,035,OC Henn. Co, portion 557,210,0(10 to remain of I-494) scheduled in FY 1982-83. NOTE: Projects already let during FY 1982-83 in Dakota County total $10.070,474. Cost to complete Interstate in Dakota County - Post FY 1983 (after rescheduling) - I -35E - 541,180,000 I-494 - 39,480,000 - µ:F ^t•t =s Total $80,660,000 /� " 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Twenty -One El CAROL LINDO/ASSESSMENTS A. Carol Lindo Discussion Regarding Assessments -- Mrs. Carol Lindo has requested on the March 16 agenda (please refer to the letter enclosed on page 99 ) asking for consideration on various assessments levied against her property in Vienna Woods. A similar request was reviewed by the City Council regarding an agreement with Mr. Bump and his obligations on three (3) lots in Vienna Woods for street assessments. The City did cooperate by working with Mr. Bump and Mrs. Lindo and those assessments were respread to Mr. Bump's property. Apparently, Mrs. Lindo has her property for sale, but is having some difficulty and would like- some sort of financial relief regarding the assessments levied against her property. Without the City staff spending considerable time re- viewing the records of Mrs. Lindo's assessments, if action is to be taken directing any additional relief for assessments levied against Mrs. Lindo's property, the staff should be directed to prepare a report for further review by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To deny the request by Mrs. Lindo or to order the City staff to research the assessments and prepare a memorandum for review and additional consideration by the City Council at a future meeting. zo r � 444 - We- /t SH FEB 25 :82 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Twenty -Two REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF LAHASS COMMERCIAL REVENUE BONDS C. Request for Extension of Commercial Revenue Bonds for LaHass Mr. Frank J. Hassleman is requesting an extension until June 1, 1983 to consider issuance of commercial revenue bonds that were approved on March 18, 1980 for a project on Hwy. 13. Mr. Hassleman is sending a letter to the City making a formal request; a copy should be enclosed with the administrative agenda on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny an exten- sion of time for commercial revenue bond funding due to the slump in the economy and uncertainty of the future until June 1, 1983 for LaHass. POSTING BOARD FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT D. Posting Board for Police Department Building -- Mayor Blomquist and City Administrator Hedges have discussed the possibility of adding one additional posting place to the current posting place at City Hall. The new posting place for all official notices of meetings and other information could be in the vestibule of the Police Department building. Since the Police Department building is open twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, an inside reader board would be available to the public at any time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny an in- terior reader board to allow posting of meeting notices and other related documents at the Police Department Building. s/Thomas LHedges Cit�dministrator lU� a 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 12, 1982 SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL Height Limitations Enclosed is a memorandum from City Attorney Hauge that provides legal procedure on the final adoption of amendment to ordinance #52 pertaining to height limitations. (Pages 10'7> through 10 ) Cedar School Letter Enclosed on pages /05' through pared by the City TUmInnistrator of Schools for District #191 at regarding proposed and designate Letter of Commendation d/04 is a copy of the letter pre- and—submitted to the Superintendent the direction of the City Council use of Cedar School. Enclosed on pages 107 through /09' is a letter of thanks to the public safety departments. Protective Inspections Monthly Reports for January & February Enclosed on pages 109 through 110 are copies of the monthly inspection reportso�rotective Inspections. Dakota County Court & Jail Facility Enclosed on pages 111 through 112 is a copy of a letter and attached resolution r�ing'theocat on of a Dakota County court and jail facility. The City Administrator will be attending the Dakota County Board of Commissioners meeting on March 16, 1982 and will have a report for the City Council. Public Works Questions Raised by City Council at Special Meeting ot2=£5-8 There were several questions proposed to the City Administrator at the special City Council meeting that was held on February 25, 1982. Since they pertained to public works, these questions were passed on to the Director of Public Works and his response is found on pages I I -A> through 11 . /0 / a Information Memo March 12, 1982 Page Two Q Public Works Committee Meeting for 3-11-82 A memorandum discussing several issues that were addressed by the public works committee at a scheduled meeting on March 11, 1982 is enclosed on pages IIS through [if for your review. s/Thomas LHedges (ity Ki. /OZ PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER r7 L__I HAUGE. wSmrm, Eum & I1ELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (8T. PAUL). MINNESOTA 58122 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 March 5, 1982 RE: Ordinance No. 52 - Height Limitations Dear Tom: AR" COOS 512 THLEPHOM[ 454.4224 The Height Limitations Subcommittee submitted a proposal to the Advisory Planning Commission for its review on February 23, and later the City Council reviewed and acted on the proposed changes to Ordinance No. 52 regarding height limitations in Industrial and Commercial Districts. There has been a very short period of time between the Planning Commission and City Council to draft a ordinance revision and did not offer the'staff much time to con- sider all aspects of the revisions. Dale Runkle and I have talked over the amendments in detail and because of the changes, the Council suggested on March 2, we would recommend that the Advisory Planning Commission hold a formal hearing on the amendment at its next regular meeting and then the Council act on the recommendations of the Advisory Planning Commission. Some of the reasons are as follows: 1. There are some substantial changes to the draft that was submitted to the council on March 2 and would suggest that the Planning Commission and Council again review these changes. 2. The specific interpretation of the ordinance is that there be a formal public hearing, although it is my opinion that there has been a good deal of public exposure over the last three months, notices in the newspapers, dis- cussion at both planning commission and council hearings concerning the re- visions, and also the meeting of the Height Limitation Subcommittee with notices being posted at the City Hall. 3. The Advisory Planning Commission had asked that the draft be returned to the Commission for review and this will offer them an opportunity to do so. 4. Dale and I have been discussing the impact on planned development dis- tricts and it is our opinion that it is not necessary to specifically provide under the PD provision of the ordinance any wording regarding lifting the height limitation because the use that the Council approved for the PD district would then control. For instance, if the council approved the commercial use, then the developer would be controlled by the specific provisions of the ordinance of that district and also limitations put on by the Council, and the special agreements. /O 3 Mr. Thomas Hedges March 5, 1982 Page 2 T/rro' 5. This would also give the Planning Commission and CouncilAto determine whether there are any specific provisions that it would want to insert rela- tive to the concerns that were raised regarding allowing height limitations to be removed along the bluff line of the Minnesota River Valley. PHH:ras W, yours, H. Hauge 1 BEA BLOMOU15T MAYOR .. THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR • THOMAS ELAN CITY OF EAGAN EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE JAMES A. SMITH CITY CLERK JODORE � THEODORE WS ACHT ACMTER 31!! PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMBERS .-,,,,_% P.O.I Ilw , EAGAN, MINNESOTA 551!! PHONE 454.8100 0 March 10 1982 DR THEODORE FOOT ~` SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 191 100 RIVER RIDGE CT BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Re: Proposed Use of Cedar School Building Located in the Cit} Dear Dr. Foot: At the last regular meeting of the Eagan City Council held on Tues- day, March 2, 1982, I was directed by the City Council to write a letter to Independent School District #191 to request information regarding the proposed use of Cedar School after its official closing this year. Since Cedar Elementary School is located within the City of Eagan adjacent to a residential neighborhood, the City Council is con- cerned about the proposed use of Cedar School upon its official closing this year. The City of Eagan has completed a comprehensive guide plan and this property is shown as a public facilities use. The City of Eagan has expended many hours analyzing the overall land use for the community and is satisfied with the land use balance proposed in the guide plan. Therefore, the City is con- cerned that the school district does not consider other types of land use for the Cedar Elementary School such as a commercial use. Since the City of Eagan has an adequate designation of commercial land throughout the City, this site shall maintain a land use integrity that is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The City of Eagan has also worked through a cooperative arrangement with your school district to provide ballfields for many age groups at Cedar Elementary School. The City is concerned that this land will be kept available for recreational and athletic events, unless the property is disposed of by the school district. Many of the users of the recreational area are residents of Independent School District #191; therefore, the City is hopeful that maintenance will continue on the ball diamonds and other recreational areas within the school grounds. 05THE/05- THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY City of Eagan/Cedar Elementary School March 10, 1982 Page Two The City of Eagan would appreciate being advised of any proposed uses that the school district might consider for the Cedar Ele- mentary School building and property. If our staff or City Council can be of any assistance in your planning process, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedg s City Administrator TLH/hnd W� BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS March 4, 1982 MICHAEL GAISBAUER 3431 HIGHLANDER DR EAGAN MN 55122 Dear Mr. Gaisbauer: a. CITY. OF EAGAN .y ,•,&M$ PILOT KNOBdROAD d"?l-I 'P.O. BOK 311" i ^ ' EAGAN, MI N NESOTA� PHONE 4544100'^- Tom. THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE CITY CLERK Your letter was received today and will be copied to the Mayor, members of the City Council, Police and Fire Departments. It is extremely rewarding to all of us who are either employed or serve your local government to have the type of input you provided in your letter. Thank you for your time and appreciation. It is definitely motivational to our Police and Fire Departments. Sincerely, c6ft1A� Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd lo -7 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. N f MAR =t 1982 /og • .larch 2, 19.92_ PROTECTIVE L`15PFCTIOD_�S DAIMILY REPORT January, 1932 (2nd Revision) LNSPFCTIOPI/OFFICF MJRS Puilding g Plumbing MVAC Administrative/Office Fire Marshal Miscellaneous General Office Permit Processing A'LP-M R OF PpR M IMM Building Plumbing AVAC Electric Water Softener Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank Signs NATUPr OF BUILDING PFRNQTS ISSUED This 1-bnth —P7__ 92.5 27.5 320.0 17.0 30.0 104.0 52.5 This Month 21 16 49 51 6 0 1 Year -Tb -Date 57.0 92.5 27.5 320.0 17.0 30.0 164.0 52.5 Year -Tb -Date 21 16 49 51 6 0 1 Number I Tme Units Valuation Permit Fee Plan check Fee Fee 5 Single Family 5 "19,000.00 $1,675.5n $837.75 --Total $ 8,207.75 0 Duplex 0 0 0 0 0 12 Multi-Fami1y 12 $540,001.00 $3,126.00 $1,563.00 $18,219.00 0 Com. Tical 0 0 0 0 n 0 Industrial 0 n 0 0 0 0 Institutional 0 0 0 0 0 0 Res. Garsae 0 0 0 0 0 0 Swim. Pool 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 14iscellaneous 4 $ 10, 700.00 $ 125.50 $23.25 $ 159.75 I 21 iiu AIS 21 1$889,700.00 $4,^')7.00 $2,429.00) $26,546..5n * Total Fees Include: Puilainct permit Fee, Sts -Charge, Plan Merl- Fee, SA(: Unit Fee, Mater- Conmection Fee, Pater Meter Fee and Road Unit Fee /09 . PROTFCTIVF WSPrMOt_TS • Parch 2, 19.92 1101m;.Y RFFORT Febmarv, 1982 Mmised) MIMECTIODI/OFFICF POURS Building Plumbing HVAC Administrative/Office Fire Marshal Miscellaneous General Office Permit Processing MUMBFR OF PM1ITS ISSUED Building Pltanbing HVAC Electric Water Softener )dell, Cesspool, Septic Tank signs m=. OF RunmIv PFAms ISSUED This t bnth 85.0 69.5 36.0 263.0 2.0 7.5 93.0 51.0 This Month 33 34 19 23 4 0 2 Year -To -Date 142.0 162.0 63.5 583.0 19.0 37.5 197.0 103.5 Year -To -Date 54 50 64 74 10 0 3 Nur,ber 10 I Twe Si ..le Famil IIni.ts 10 Valuation 3554,000.00 Permit Fee $2.,954.50 Plan (heck: Fee $1,477.2.5 Total Fee $15,759.25 2 Dmle_x 2 $ 93,000.00 $ 557.00 S 274.50 $ 3,094.50 16 Multi-Family 16 5697,000.00 $3,01.3.00 51,506.50 522,505.00 1 10M.Merical 1 S 1,500.00 $ 25.00 - - - $ 26.00 0 Industrial 0 0 0 0 0 Institutional 0 0 0 0 0 0 Res. (.rave 0 0 0 0 0 0 swim. Pool 0 0 0 0 0 4 (Miscellaneous 4 S 13,900.00 S 146.50 S 31.25 S 7.85.2.5 33 ;=-ALS 33 ($1,364,400.0 $6,696.00 S3, 7.93.50 X1,570.00 * Total Fees Include: Puilling Permit Fee, Sts -Charge, Plan ('iec.1; Fee, SAC lfiit Fee, Mater Connection Fee, I•later .Meter Fee and Poad Unit Fee //U '°^."PHONE 454.8100 March 9, 1982 FRED JOY ADMINISTRATOR DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 W HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 Re: Location of a Dakota County Court & Jail Facility Dear Mr. Joy: THOMASHEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLERK In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on Tuesday, March 2, 1982, a resolution, similar to the resolution passed by the City of Apple Valley, encouraging the Dakota County Board of Commissioners to consider construction of a combination court/jail facility in northwestern Dakota County at a site located in the City of Eagan was approved unanimously. A copy of said resolution is enclosed for your review and distribu- tion to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners. The City of Eagan has demonstrated its cooperativeness in working previously with County projects and is certainly willing to work with the Dakota County Board of Commissioners on a site if chosen in the City of Eagan in the general vicinity of Cliff Road and I -35E and/or the drivers' training center. Sincerely, c;�.M..1,�4 Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd cc: Dakota County Commissioner John Voss THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. BEA SLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMAS EGAN CITY OF EAGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS , ' THEODORE WACHTER 5795 PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMBERS P.O. BOX 211" EAGAN, MINNESOTA 551n '°^."PHONE 454.8100 March 9, 1982 FRED JOY ADMINISTRATOR DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 W HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 Re: Location of a Dakota County Court & Jail Facility Dear Mr. Joy: THOMASHEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLERK In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on Tuesday, March 2, 1982, a resolution, similar to the resolution passed by the City of Apple Valley, encouraging the Dakota County Board of Commissioners to consider construction of a combination court/jail facility in northwestern Dakota County at a site located in the City of Eagan was approved unanimously. A copy of said resolution is enclosed for your review and distribu- tion to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners. The City of Eagan has demonstrated its cooperativeness in working previously with County projects and is certainly willing to work with the Dakota County Board of Commissioners on a site if chosen in the City of Eagan in the general vicinity of Cliff Road and I -35E and/or the drivers' training center. Sincerely, c;�.M..1,�4 Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd cc: Dakota County Commissioner John Voss THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. 0 CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION 6 LOCATION OF A DAKOTA COUNTY COURT & JAIL FACILITY WHEREAS, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners is considering the construction of a combination Court/Jail facility in northwestern Dakota County, and WHEREAS, this consideration has been in process for a considerable amount of time, and WHEREAS, the Council has been advised that Dakota County is currently considering acquiring property on Cliff Road, in the vicinity of the Drivers' License Examining Station in Eagan, and WHEREAS, this City Council is willing to cooperate with Dakota County on a northwestern Dakota County location for a combination Court/Jail facility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan as follows: 1. That this City Council does continue to support the location of a combination Court and Jail facility in northwestern Dakota County. 2. That from a County—wide perspective,: the operating efficiency of the County Sheriff's office and the Dakota County Court system would be enhanced by Court/Jail facilities in northwestern Dakota County, inasmuch as more than 50 percent of the Felony offenses, gross misdemeanor offenses, juvenile petitions and intakes are processed within the Cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan and Lakeville. 3. Location of a Court/Jail facility in northwestern Dakota County would help the efficiency of the area police departments via less travel time to court proceedings, appearances at the jail, etc. 4. A majority of the Dakota County population resides in the Cities of Burnsville, Apple Valley, Eagan and Lakeville. As such, the location of a Court/Jail facility in this area would be a convenience and benefit to the public. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be forwarded to members of the Dakota County Board of Commissioners. . Dated: March 2, 1982 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN 'ST• (k s —&I By: City eryor � Z� TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS C� DATE: MARCH 9, 1982 RE: CITY COUNCIL WORK ORDER REQUEST - FEBRUARY 25. 1982 In response to your mane of March 8, the following is the Public Works Department's response to those specific items of concern addressed by the City Council: 1. I can appreciate the Council's concern pertaining to the traffic adjacent to the Orvilla Homes and the resulting safety concerns for the related handicapped individuals. There presently does not exist any standard sign available that would warn the travel- ing public that handicapped individuals are in the immediate vi- cinity. I am presently working with our traffic sign supplier to deteanine if similar requests have been processed and if not, to work out a design for a specific installation such as this location. In any event, we will insure that some type of identi- fication sign will be installed both north and southbound inform- ing the traveling public of special caution required. We can post an advisory speed limit sign of 20 rrph on the same post that the handicapped advisory sign would be installed on. We will install a 20 mph advisory speed limit sign unless we receive a directive to do otherwise. As soon as these signs are installed, I will notify the Council accordingly. 2. We will order the necessary similar advance'firestation warning signs and will have them installed on Rahn Road for Fire Station #1 and on Pilot Knob Road and Wilderness Run Road for Fire Station No. 3 similar to those that have been installed for Fire Station #2. Upon the completion of their installation, we will inform the Council accordingly. 3. We will add the request for a major intersection street light on County Road 30 at Heine-Strasse Lane as a part of the major inter- section street lighting report to be presented to the Council dur- ing this spring. 4. If, at the time of this memo, the stop sign has not been replaced at the intersection of the Minnesota Federal service drive with Rahn Road, we will either have our crews replace it if we were responsible or require Minnesota Federal to replace it if their private snow removal contractor created the damage. We will in- form you when this work has been completed. 11 -2 a 0 Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator March 9, 1982 Page two We appreciate these items being brought to our attention so that we can respond accordingly. Please let us know if there are any other mainte- nance items that need a response by the Public Works Department. TAC/jack cc - Bill Branch, Superintendent 1/4f MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT DATE: MARCH 11, 1982 SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING, 3-11-82 The Public Works Committee met in the office of the Public Works Director at 8:00 a.m. on Thursday, March 11, 1982. Several issues were discussed with the following comments, status reports and/or recommendations to be forwarded to the City Council for their infor- mation: I. BEACON HILLS/BROWNS POND STORM SEWER OUTLET Mr. Richard Scherrer had contacted several Council members re- questing consideration of the potential damage associated with the storm sewer lift station water discharge that flows across his property north of Cliff Road and east of Thomas Lake Road. The background and history pertaining to the installation of this temporary lift station was discussed in detail. Because of the existing ground cover conditions, it is not possible to evaluate if Mr. Scherrer has experienced any damages resulting from erosion of this storm water flow. RECOMMENDATION: Staff contact Mr. Scherrer and inform him that when the snow cover has disappeared the public works committee will meet with him on the site and will evaluate the impact the storm sewer lift station discharge has across his property through a test pumping of the lift station. II. CITY LICENSING OF CONTRACTORS A status report was discussed pertaining to a potential new ordi- nance for the City of. Eagan requiring a licensing of various con- tractors performing work within the City. Chief Building Official Dale Peterson presented a sample of a survey to be sent to other communities requesting information regarding similar situations. Upon completion of this survey, a status report will be prepared and brought back to the public works committee. RECOMMENDATION: None at this time. III. SNOW PLOWING POLICIES/PROCEDURES At the February 16 Council meeting, the Mayor referred the snow plowing complaint to the public works committee pertaining to snow removal at her residence. A copy of the Mayor's letter and the Public Works Director's response was made available to the public works committee. After reviewing the information and the present i/s Public Works Committee March 11, 1982 Page Two snow removal policy of the Public Works Department, the public works committee commended the maintenance division for its excellent job of snow removal this past winter season while expressing regrets that isolated incidents such as this do happen to occur. It was the committee's concurrence that incidences similar to this one are inherent when trying to provide snow removal for the approximate 21,000 citizens in this community. The committee did not feel that this isolated incident warranted any change or revision to the existing snow removal policy or procedures. RECOMMENDATION: Isolated incidents should not change an otherwise overall good snow removal policy and/or program but should be dealt with on an individual basis while trying to minimize similar situa- tions in the future. IV. 1982 LOAD LIMIT RESTRICTIONS The public works committee was informed on concerns by the Public Works Department pertaining to continued load limit restrictions notification and enforcement within the City of Eagan. The Public Works Department performed a limited survey of the following neigh- boring communities within Dakota County pertaining to standardizing load limit criteria: Apple Valley, Inver Grove Heights, Burnsville, Lakeville, West St. Paul and Rosemount. All communities, with the exception of Rosemount, do not post any seasonal load restric- tions. Rosemount, while they do post load limit restrictions, has never issued a tag for violation for an overweight vehicle. The Dakota County Highway Department, while they postload limit restrictions on certain county roads, has limited enforcement due to the extensive issuance of permits to whomever requests a variance from this load limit restriction. None of the communities have portable scales available to check overweight vehicles and the courts have indicated that in order to enforce weight violations, both the scale the operator must have been certified by the Minne- sota Department of Weights and Measures to allow it to stand up in court. Also, if a community is lax in its enforcement or freely issues permits, the weight violations are often dismissed by the courts. Subsequently, none of the communities surveyed attempt to provide adequate enforcement. In the past the City has continued to post the same streets and areas for weight limit restrictions without performing an adequate evaluation as to need. This is what precipitated the need for the survey to determine a uniform method and criteria for deter- mining load limit restrictions. In summary, the Public Works De- partment feels that the annual posting of load limit restrictions within the City of Eagan should not be provided for in 1982 for the following reasons: 116 0 Public Works Committee March 11, 1982 Page Three 1. It takes the Public Works Maintenance Division approximately two -three days to install these signs with a similar length of time for their removal. 2. Discussions with the Police Department indicate that enforcement is very difficult without portable scales and conviction for violiations are practically non-existent, resulting in voluntary compliance with posted signs being the only practical means of enforcement. 3. Administrative work load associated with the issuance of special permits for garbage trucks, school buses, moving vans, MTC buses, and other specific special case requests cannot effi- ciently and effectively be handled by the present manpower available. After taking these permit vehicles into considera- tion, the percentage of violating vehicles is such a small factor in relationship to the total volume of traffic that enforcement is not practical and resulting damage is minimal compared to the amount of work effort put into trying to enforce these wight limit restrictions. 4. Those vehicles abiding by the County road weight limit restrictions would sufficiently meet the weight limit restric- tions anticipated to be posted by the City. Therefore, we will receive a similar benefit on our roads through enforcement of the County's weight limit.restrictions. RECOMMENDATION: Temporarily disband 1982 weight limitrestriction program and evaluate its effects for further study and recommenda- tion for future years for weight limit restriction posting as re- quired. V. WATER TREATMENT PLANT CONSIDERATION The public works committee reviewed the results of the survey per- formed by the City of Eagan in the fall of 1981 combined with the response at the public hearing held on January 12, 1982 and the information associated with each of the various alternatives per- taining to a water treatment plant for iron/manganese removal and/or hardness reduction. There was concern expressed pertaining to the approximated $10,000,000 facility for the full fledged treatment plant that was discussed in previous reports on Project 338. It was determined that there have been no requests or desires. for a central hardness reduction (water softening) plant. Therefore, it was determined that further discussion pertaining to the feasi- bility of a centralized water reduction plant is no longer warranted. With a decision pertaining to the elimination for consideration of a hardness reduction plant, the public works committee feels that a further more detailed study should be performed pertaining to more accurate cost analysis for a limited iron/manganese removal 117 a Public Works Committee March 11, 1982 Page Four plant only. It was felt, iaith.-this idditionalfuture information in a more detailed and accurate. form due to its limited scope of study for iron/manganese removal plant only, that the staff could issue a new survey containing cost information to the community through future spring or summer newsletters. It was recommended that another public hearing be followed as closely as possible to the return of the surveys during the summertime so that the people who are experiencing the problems an opportunity to respond during the time of their problems. It is felt that this step will provide the Council with more accurate information in order to make the most beneficial and intelligent decision pertaining to an item that will affect the community from here on out. The committee felt that these further studies were necessary due to the size of the project that the Council would be considering and taking into consideration the long term impact pertaining to future water quality for existing and future residences and future commercial and industrial developments that will occur within this community. The committee was concerned with potential future state and federal requirements pertaining to strict rules of water conservation which might restrict the use of flushing of systems to eliminate the present rusty water problem. RECOMMENDATION: In summary, the public works committee is making the following recommendtions for consideration: 1. Eliminate the hardness reduction from further consideration for the treatment of water quality. 2. Restudy and refine the costs associated with a limited iron/ manganese removal treatment plant only. 3. Prepare and distribute a new survey with new cost information with the spring or summer 1982 newsletters. 4. Conduct a public hearing immediately following the response of the survey format during the summer of 1982. The public works committee will be available at the City Council meeting of March 16 to discuss in further detail these issues and resulting recommendations with the full Council. The public works committee meeting was adjourned at 9:40 a.m., March 11, 1982. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert Director of Public Works TAC/hnd liq AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL MARCH 16, 1982 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 — ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:33 — ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:35 — PROCLAMATIONS e.l A. Building Safety Week P 1 B. Kelly Girl Week IV. 6:40 — DEPARTMENT READ BUSINESS p 6 A. Fire Department p9 C. Park Department y B. Police Department e10D. Public Works Department V. 6:55 — CONSENT ITEMS (One motion approves all items) ?.11 A. Reconciliation & Certification of Destruction for Bond Issues F 21 B. Temporary Non—Intoxicating Liquor & Bingo Licenses for St. John Neumann Church 21 C. Project 323A, Receive Final Assessment Roll (Coachman Land Q Company First Addition) Q.21 D. Project 336A, Receive Final Assessment Roll (Tomark First Addition) .17.E. Johnson First Addition — Reapportionment of Special Assessments e'2I-F. Overhill Farm First Addition — Reapportionment of Special ?I Assessments VI. 7:00 — PUBLIC HEARINGS T. 2g A. Civil Defense Warning Siren Locations VII. OLD BUSINESS JIR A. Water Treatment Plant -:k. 6B. Appointments to Joint Burnsville/Eagan Cable Television Commission P'2 bC. Winkler Development Company for Rezoning from GB (General Business) to PD (Planned Development) to Allow an Office Complex— Hotel—Motel—High Rise on Approximately 17 Acres, Located in Part of the SW'y of the SA of Section 19 (north of Diffley Road and between the Cedar Avenue Freeway and T.H. 13) • 0 Eagan City Council Agenda March 16, 1982 Page Two VIII. NEW BUSINESS p.3 A. D.C.C.F. Inc. (Arnold A. Carlson) for a Waiver of Plat to Move a Lot Line 13' for Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd, and Lot 7, Block 1, Wilderness Park 3rd, Located in Section 27 3'7 B. National Amusement Co. (Sam Nilba) for a Conditional Use to Allow p' More than 3 Amusement Devices in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) District, Located in a Portion of the Cedarval Shopping Center, Located in Part of the NE'g of Section 19 45' C. U. S. Homes Corporation for a Preliminary Plat (Lexington Place) P' Consisting of Approximately 84.62 Acres Located in Part of the A of the SA of Section 14 (east of Lexington Road and north of Wescott Road) p C 5D. Tomark Development Company for a Preliminary Plat (Tomark 2nd Addition) Consisting of Approximately 25.3 Acres Located on Outlot A, Tomark 1st Addition in Section 14 (south of Yankee Doodle Road and east of Lexington) 'd. E. Roger and Judith Urban for Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to r I-1 (Light Industrial) District and for a Preliminary Plat (Alpha Addition) Consisting of Approximately 12 Acres and Containing One Lot Located in Part of the SE'y of the SEk of Section 25 (north of Cliff Road in the T.H. 3 area) 9.9 Z F. Overbill Farm First Addition Final Plat Approval P y j G. Amusement Device License for Applebaums Food Store IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 9 SA. Resolution to Consider Funding for Proposed I -35E _ q% B. Carol Lindo Discussion Regarding Assessments FjooC. Request for Extension/Commercial Revenue Bonds for LaHass P IpoD. Posting Board/Police Department Building P' X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 11, 1982 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval of the March 2, 1982 regular City Council minutes and the the March 16, 1982 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration: BUILDING SAFETY WEEK A. Building Safety Week -- The week of April 12 through April 16 has been proclaimed by Governor Quie as Building Safety Week. Chief Building Inspector Peterson has a proclamation, a copy is enclosed on page Z for your review. Also enclosed on page 3 is a copy of t—H—e-Rorth Star Chapter legislative policy state- ment. There is a seventeen minute slide program which is quite interesting and emphasizes building safety that Chief Building Inspector Peterson and the City Administrator would like for the City Council to have an opportunity to review. Due to the length of the agenda, the slide program will begin at 6:15 p.m. in the City Council Chambers for those members of the City Council who are able to attend. The regular City Council meeting will begin promptly following the slide program. KELLY GIRL WEEK B. Kelly Girl Week -- Each year, the City of Eagan participates in a proclamation honoring "Kelly Week". Enclosed on pages 4 through S is a copy of a news release that provides back- ground on Kelfy-7ervices and, more specifically, their Kelly Week which is designated as March 14 through 20. Proclamation WHEREAS: THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE NORTH STAR CHAPTER OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS 15 COMPRISED OF BUILDING OFFICIALS OF THE VARIOUS CITIES AND COUNTIES OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA; AND WHEREAS: IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF BUILDING OFFICIALS TO ADMINISTER THE STATE CONSTRUCTION CODES, ADOPTED BY THE CITIES AND COUNTIES CONCERNED WITH PROVIDING A MINIMUM MEASURE OF PROTECTION FOR THE HEALTH. SAFETY, AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE AFFORDED BY THESE CODES: AND WHEREAS: THE GENERAL PUBLIC SERVED BY THESE OFFICIALS IS OFTEN NOT CLEARLY INFORMED OF THE ACTIVITIES NECESSARY IN ADMINISTERING THE CONSTRUCTION CODES: AND WHEREAS: THE FAILURE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO RECOGNIZE THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION CODES ADOPTED AND ADMINISTERED BY THESE CITIES AND COUNTIES OFTEN SERVES TO IMPEDE THE EFFORTS OF THE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENTS; AND WHEREAS: PUBLIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENTS WILL SERVE NOT ONLY TO FACILITATE THE WORK OF THESE INSPECTORS, BUT ALSO ASSIST THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IN ASSURING PROTECTION OF THE HEALTH, SAFETY. AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC; NOW. THEREFORE, 1, ALBERT H. OUIE, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DO HEREBY PROCLAIM THE WEEK OF APRIL 12 THROUGH APRIL 16. 1982 TO BE B U I L D I N 6 SAFETY WEEK IN MINNESOTA. AND HAVE ASKED LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR LOU WAN68ERG TO PREPARE THIS PROCLAMATION AND DISSEMINATE THE SAME. FURTHER, I URGE CITIZENS TO BE AWARE OF THE ROLE THE BUILDING OFFICIALS PLAY IN PROTECTING THE HEALTH. SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF MINNESOTA. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS AND CAUSED THE GREAT SEAL OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO BE AFFIXED THIS FOURTEENTH DAY OF JANUARY IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-TWO, AND OF THE STATE THE ONF HUNDRED TWENTY-THIRD. G0VERN03„ a✓�G�� (/ LIEUTENANT OF STATE z ,North Star Chanter Legislative Policy Statement 0 In accordance with the Minnesota Laws 1971, Chapter 561 which establishes the State Building Code and a system of surcharges to support the administration of the Code. The State Legislature should assure that the State Building Code remain as the minimum standard for construction throughout Minnesota by: 1. Not allowing communities to adopt alternative, or more, or less restrictive codes. That the S.S.C. be the only building code used by municipalities, design profes- sionals and the construction industry throughout the state. 2. Encourage local communities to voluntarily adopt the S.S.C. by: a. Allowing joint powers inspection agreements between communities. b. Allowing communities to contract for private code enforcement. e. Consolidating agency inspection functions such as handicapped provisions, energy related requirements, health service or related licensing require- ments, to the jurisdiction of the local building inspector. 3. Encourage uniform enforcement and interpretation of the State Building Code by continuing to require certification of all Building Officials by an initial state conducted exam and also to: Provide a continuing education program or a recerti- fication requirement. 4. Maintenance of the State Building Codes Division with adequate allocations of the state building permit surcharge fees being collected, to assure the following: a. Timely adoption of the latest editions of appropriate national model code documents. b. Adequate staff to maintain present level or expansion of existing educational programs to include: 1) Quarterly newsletters 2) Quarterly area one day educational seminars 3) Scholarship programs for more extensive educational opportunities for individuals 4) Sponsorship of communities membership in the International Conference of Building Officials c. Adequate staff to serve the code consultant needs of participating communities in the areas of: 1) Plan review on a request and fee basis 2) Experienced professional staff available for telephone consultation with local Building Officials on the subjects of: (a) Structural Analysis (b) Fire Protection (c) Plumbing (d) Electrical (e) HVAC (f) Handicapped Provisions (g) Energy Code Requirements (h) Mobile and Manufactured Home Requirements (i) Other Code Areas as Necessar7 3) Staff to serve as secretary to various advisory committees including: (A) Building Officials (b) Handicapped Code Advisory Committee (c) Structural Advisory Committee (d) Fire and Life Safety Committee (e) Mechanical Code Committee (f) Ad -floc committees as required 0 0 K L N Kelly Girl" People SERVICES 5275 Edina Industrial Boulevard, Suite 118, Edina, Minnesota 55435' CONTACT: Nell Piper District Manager A/C 835-6813 FOR D44EDIATE RELEASE KELLY14EEK CELEBRATION SET Telephone: 16121835-6813 ISSUED: March 5, 1982 For the 18th consecutive year, Kelly Services offices throughout the United States and Canada will celebrate Kellyweek, March 14-20 by honoring their more"than 300,000 temporary employees. In honor of'the occasion, eight local mayors have officially declared "Kellyweek" throughout the Twin Cities area. . During the week surrounding St. Patrick's Day, colorful buttons, costumes and flowers will highlight various activities... Kelly Fashion Shows... contests... breakfasts and luncheons for employees and customers. "we take this opportunity to honor all our temporary employees for thier outstanding skill and service" explains Nell Piper, District Manager of the Kelly District located at 5275 Edina Industrial Blvd. in Edina. In the Twin Cities, Kellyweek will be celebrated by holding a Shamrock growing contest at the Brookshire Board and Care Home for the Elderly. Kelly Services is constantly recruiting which includes Senior Citizens and the handicapped. To help those returning to the work force we upgrade their skills by offering free brush up classes on typing and shorthand through our Grolier "202" program. In addition we offer an excellent free course in word Processing. Look for us in the St. Patrick's Day 4 Kelly Girl Division • Kelly Marketing • Kelly Light Industrial • Kelly Technical • Kelly Health Care G.P.O. Box 1179 Detroit, MI 48266 Telephone: (313) 362.4444 KLLJ ;Plein^ • • SERVICES a - 2 - parades and on the Skyways in downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul. We'll be handing out momentos and offering free blood pressure tests. Also, a Kelly temporary employee from both ouf Kelly Girl and Light Industrial divisions will be honored by each of our eight local offices as the "Kelly Employee of the Year". These employees will be honored at a luncheon at the downtown Minneapolis Athletic Club. Kelly Services, Inc., one of the world's largest temporary help companies, has over 500 branch offices in the United States, Canada, Peurto Rico, England and France. They provide business and industry with temporary employees from six divisions: Office, Clerical, Marketing, Light Industrial, Technical, Health Care and Service Bureau. - 30- c.- Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Two 'DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- The Fire Department is proposing to locate a water ball on property adjacent to Fire Station #2 for training purposes. The property is owned by Northwestern Mutual Life In- surance Company. An agreement has been prepared by that company and presented to the City of Eagan that essentially holds Northwes- tern Mutual Life Insurance Company harmless of any injury or any other liability that may be encountered if the property is used for a water ball practive area. A copy of the agreement is enclosed on pages 7 through $ for your review. Fire Chief Childers will be present at the meeting to answer any questions regarding the proposed water ball practice area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny authori- zation of the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an agreement with Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company allowing the City to utilize property adjacent to Fire Station #2 for a water ball practice area. 0 Pentagon OIIISe,Park THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE Suite 424 • 4940 Viking Drive INSURANCE COMPANY • MILWAUKEE , `I' L Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Telephone: 612 835-6626 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT OFFICE Tom Hedges, City City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Eagan, Minnesota Gentlemen: Administrator Road 55122 March 8, 1982 We understand that your Fire Department would like to use a portion of our property located on Lone Oak Circle in the City of Eagan and next to Fire Station No. 2 for a water ball practice area. We are prepared to make such property available at no cost to the City of Eagan for such purpose, subject to the following conditions: 1. The property, legally described as the South six feet of the North 156 feet of the West 200 feet of Lot 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 ("Property"), shall be used solely for the purpose of a water ball practice area and for no other purpose. 2. Any equipment and improvements to the Property will be made at the sole cost and expense of the City of Eagan. Any such improvements will be temporary in nature and will be removed at the cost and expense of the City of Eagan upon termination of this Agreement. 3. This Agreement will terminate at any time upon 30 days written notice given by the undersigned to the City of Eagan by letter addressed to the City of Eagan and deposited in the United States mail. 4. The City of Eagan shall indemnify and hold ourselves and the Property harmless from any and all liability arising from or relating to the construction of any improvements, or use thereon, including without limitation any personal injuries to participants or spectators or other persons in connection with the water ball practice area. Neither the Property, nor any portion of our remaining property in Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2, shall be available for any other use by the City of Eagan without our prior written consent. You shall provide to us certificates of liability insurance evidencing the fact that the City of Eagan, and/or its Fire Department, has and maintains public liability insurance covering employees and guests of the Fire Department who participate in the water ball activities in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injuries to one person and relating to one occurence. Such certificate of liability insurance shall be issued in favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and shall provide for 30 days notice to Northwestern in the event of any termination or cancellation thereof. If such policy shall not be renewed and continue in force and effect, this Agreement shall immediately terminate on the date when such insurance policy shall lapse. City of Eagan March 8, 1982 Page Two If the foregoing reflects your understanding of our agreements, please execute a counterpart of this letter and return it to Mr. Thomas S. Davis at The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, Suite 424, Pentagon Office Park, 4940 Viking Drive, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435. You will be authorized to enter and make use of the Property, subject to the terms of this letter, when we receive a signed counterpart of this letter and the certificate of insurance required hereunder. We are pleased to cooperate with the City of Eagan in this fashion. Very truly yours, THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. Its Senior Representative The foregoing has been read and agreed to. We will provide the Certificate of Insurance and use the Property only subject to the foregoing conditions. Dated:_ , 1982. CITY OF EAGAN 0 And is cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney W 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Three POLICE DEPARTMENT 41 A. Police Department -#l: Chief of Police DesLauriers would like authorization to proceed with the hiring of one (1) part time person to work twenty-four hours per week or two (2) part time persons to work twelve hours each per week as police dispatchers. Item #2: A recommendation has also been received from Chief of o�Iice DesLauriers that Mr. Ron Gjorvad be hired as a police officer effective April 1, 1982. Item #3: That Mr. Jim Sewald be hired as a police officer subject to positive results on psycological and physical examinations, effective July 1, 1982. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the hiring recommendation for the dispatcher position and the two (2) personnel for sworn police officer positions. (Special Note: These items are approved as a part of the 1982 budget.) PARK DEPARTMENT C. Park Department -- Item #1: The Director of Parks and Recrea- tion is planning to prod -with the construction and placement of five (5) park signs for community and neighborhood parks this summer. These five (5) signs were approved as a part of the 1982 budget. The signs to be installed include Highview Park, Cedar Pond Park, Blackhawk Park, and Bur Oaks Park. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee is also recommending that Rahn Park be officially named Rahn Park and a sign would be installed as the fifth sign at that park. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APRC to name Rahn Park Rahn Park. Item #2: The Director of Parks & Recreation, after lifting the ub-dget freeze, is proceeding with the purchase of the capital outlay budgeted for the Parks & Recreation Department. The following equipment is to be purchased by the Parks & Recreation Department: a forty inch Gravley mover to be used in ditches, by the Police Department and other related embankments and other types of surfaces in the the amount $3,645; a power deck pull behind mover deck in the amount of $1,225 to replace an old John Deere mower; one (1) hand mower; one (1) hand trimmer; and one (1) trailer with a weight capacity of 12,000 lbs. that will carry both groundmaster mowers and other purposes while performing the summer mowing cycling pro- gram. The Parks & Recreation Department along with the Public Works and Water and Sewer Departments are considering the purchase of one F-10 truck each through the Hennipin County purchasing pro- gram. This will provide the City an opportunity to size down on 7 E Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Four 40 trucks for supervisory and non -hauling purposes from the one ton or three-quarter ton pickups traditionally used. There is one item that was not included in the budget and that is a snow blower attachment for the Gravley mower that is being purchased. A snow blower would cost approximately $1,100 as an attachment. Currently, the John Deere which will be traded once the aforementioned mower deck is purchased has a snow blower which is in need of repair. The repair will run approximately $1,100 and the City would still have a used piece of equipment. Since the City can sell the snow- blower attachment and the John Deere for an estimated sum of $800, it seemed appropriate to purchase the snow blower attachment for the Gravley. Actually, there is little additional expense incurred by the City of Eagan, realizing there would have been a repair cost essentially the same as the cost for the new snow blower and, in addition, there will be revenues realized by the trade in of the existing John Deere. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny approxi- mately an $1,100 expenditure for a snow blower attachment for the Gravley forty inch mower. Item #3: Teen Program -- The Advisory Parks & Recreation Committee is recommending, after several months of study, a teen program. Background information regarding the teen program is enclosed on pages i work through /b Also enclosed is a copy of the teen voluteer contract ani -application form to the program that will be helpful in providing additional background for this item (pages 1-7 through /g ). The APRC is looking for instruction by the ity Council-for—potential endorsement for the program. The Lions Club has tentatively agreed to consider a nominal amount of funding if the City Council accepts the concept and program. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Committee re- garding the concept of a teen program and to direct the staff to begin to firm up and enter into agreements for transportation as well as allow the advisory committee to seek additional outside funding from other sources to supplement the departmental budget. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D. Public Works Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Public Works Department at this time. /0 • March 11, 1982 ME1MO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR Iv FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: TEEN PROGRAM A sub -committee of the Parks and Recreation Committee have for several months now been studying potential teen programs. As you recall, during the late summer of 1980 the department discontinued the then Teen program that was being offered. This program was discontinued because of the limited attendance and the prohibitively high cost per individual that was being occurred by the department. Since then the Advisory Committee has recognized the need to offer some teen programs and have been trying to identify a methodology for providing this service. The sub -committee has met several times during the last several months with church leaders, police, as well as contacting other communities to see how they provide their teen programs. Recently, the Advisory Committee has been focusing in on one particular aspect of a teen program, which is a teen volunteer/ work program. The proposal attempts to provide some constructive volunteer work experiences for teen -alters age 13 through 15. The work experience seeks to simulate the experience of application/interview and actual job exposure. Secondarily, the City of Eagan would be able to benefit by having these youths performing a variety of tasks in the parks and re- creation system. Attached to this memo is the "second draft" of the teen volunteer project "proposal" which was submitted to the Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee at the March 4, 1982 meeting. The proposal outlines some of the objectives - publication, application and selection procedure as well as the necessity to provide supervision, transportation, meaning- fuliwork projects and a basic work contract. The Advisory Committee recom- mended that this proposal be presented to the City Council for their review and concurrence before the Advisory Committee were to continue working on this concept. Perhaps the two singularly largest issues that must yet be resolved is budget and transportation. The department has budgeted approximately $500.00 for potential teen programs through 1982. However, this proposal has set its budget expenditures at between $900.00 and $1,100.00. This sum is based on a $500.00 "salary" to be paid in a "lump -sum" to each individual participant; transportation cost and funding for incidentals such as a "final" event" for all volunteer workers to participate in. Committee member Carolyn Thurston has made contact with two community civic organizations to determine if they would be interested in making a financial contributions to assist in this program. A specific dollar amount was not solicited as neither committee or council approval had been obtained for this project/proposal. It is hope- ful to that additional funding might be had from other civic groups to supplement existing budget dollars. In terms of transportation, committee member McNeely had been tracking on both a paid bussing program as well as a volunteer bussing program from a local church group. Apparently, the church group may be willing to provide the buses at no charge providing the City would be willing to secure an insurance binder and provide routine maintenance on the vehicles while being used by the City. This would include both gas and oil. A driver for the vehicle would also have to be licensed, which the department could provide from its existing labor force. (Also attached is a draft of the summer teen volunteer work contract and application form to the program which helps describe the intent and purpose lI Teed Program - Memo March 11, 1982 Page 2 of this program for interested teens.) The Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee, would like to have this presented to the City Council at its March 16th meeting under departmental business or at the conclusion of the regular City Council meeting for their review and discussion to determine if the committee should pursue this work program. Specifically, an authorization by the council to proceed, to allow staff to begin to firm up and enter into agreements for transportation as well as to allow the Advisory Committee to seek additional outside funding from other sources to supplement the depart- mental budget, is sought. Should you have any questions in regards to this item please feel free to contact me. /a • • 2nd Draft 2/26/82 TEEN VOLUNTEER PROJECT - PROPOSAL OBJECTIVES: 1. To provide a constructive volunteer/work experience for teens ages 13 through 15. 2. To provide the experience of application, interview and fulfillment of contract expectations. 3. To mold a cohesive group from individuals of diverse neighborhoods and schools. 4. To provide the opportunity for teens to develop pride in the City of Eagan Parks system. S. A means to beautify and improve the City of Eagan. PUBLICITY, APPLICATION, SELECTION: 1. The summer Newsletter, slated for mid-May delivery will be the major source of publicity. a. Teens may not always read, however their parents hopefully will. 2. Applicants will fill out a form as for regular employment. a. Devise a separate form for this - information such as: 1) Allergies b. Forms available at Parks and Recreation office. 1) Mail out 2) "Application day" at Cedarvale/Parks and Recreation office. 3. Interview by groups of 5 or 6 a. Groups comprised of teens from differing neighborhoods. 4. Criteria for selection a. Maximum number determined by budget - approximately 20. b. Interest, enthusiasm, availability. c. Mix of ages, neighborhoods. S. If too many teens apply a. Select oldest first. b. Ratio of boys/girls the same as what apply. "CONTRACT" 1. A contract will be designed and a meeting of all those selected held to explain the departments expectations, specific aspects of the program and their responsibility. 2. The signed contract is their promise to follow through; also the de- partments affirmation to provide the experiences as stated. 3. Telephone call from the teen if they are ill on a project day.The week of the culminative activity. a. One "make-up day" if needed so that the contract can be ful- filled by a teen who missed one day. b. More than one miss abrogates the contract. TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES 1. Parents transport children to the public works building or the site of the days activity. 2. Department provide a bus to pick up teens at: a. The 5 elementary schools in Eagan b. Or designated park sites. 3. Teens bused to: a. The activity site 13 b. The public works garage. 0 0 4. Bus returns teens to pick up point. BUDGET 1. The dollars available must provide: a. Transportation for all activities b. The "contract" remuneration for each completes all projects. 1) 20 teens @$25.00 = $500.00 c. "Tickets" for culminating activity. d. $25.00 for incidental treats. PROJECTS 1. Time Frame teen who successfully. a. Projects planned for 5 consecutive weeks, one day per week; always the same day. 1) A 6 hour project day 8:00 AM - 2:30 PM would a) solve the maintenance man overtime possibility. b) Take into account a 13 year olds attention span. 2. Projects to be provided: a. The five projects will be identified and the specific day each is to be accomplished will be provided at the beginning of the program. 1) This will allow parents to know specifically where their teens are. b. Examples of the types of projects possible are: 1. Weed a tree nursery 2. Paint garbage cans 3. Pick rocks at Northview Athletic 4. Collect trash at various parks - developed and/or undeveloped. S. Weed play perimeters in parks 6., Paint a hockey rink 7. Dakota County Parks "if they contribute" 3. Rainy day alternatives: a. Have projects in reserve that can be done indoors providing space for the number of teens involved can be determined. SUPERVISION 1. A regular full time maintenance man Minimum number of 2 2. An adult volunteer a. Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee b. Retired people c. A service organization SPECIAL EVENT 1. The culminating activity will be selected by consensus by the group from a list of economically feasible possibilities. a. examples 1. Horse back riding 2. Apple river tubing I4 0 0 3. Twins game 4. Valley Fair S. SHAKES - all you can eat day 6. A movie TEEN WORK PROGRAM - TIME FRAME 1. Finalize program content and budget by April 1S. 2. Publicize in Newsletter - mid-May delivery. 3. "Applications" until June 1. 4. Interviews - in groups week of June 7. S. First "work" day June 17 ---- last July 15 (if Thursday is the day) 6. Special event the week of July 19. /s • • 2/25/82 TEEN PROGRAM BUS RATES KAL 1) $90.00 per day with driver furnished. 2) Without a driver it is $24.00 per day plus .201 per mile and plus fuel. Maintenance and insurance would be provided by the City. SAFEWAY 1) $70.00 per day with driver furnished . x 5 = 5350.00 2) Without a driver the rates would be negotiable, probably would compare with the KAL rates. CEDAR GROVE BAPTIST 1) The pastor is quite reluctant. ROSEMOUNT BAPTIST CHURCH 1) Has 12 buses "may work something out" 16 • CITY OF EAGAN • PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 3501 COACHMAN RD. EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 SUMMER TEEN VOLUNTEER/WORK CONTRACT It is hereby agreed by and between the Eagan Parks and Recreation Department and as follows: your name) 1. The said (your name) shall perform all of the Summer Teen Volunteer/Work projects as assigned by the Parks and Recreation Department. 2. The City of Eagan shall reimburse said (your name), as follows: $25.00, paid at the end of the program plus a culminating re- creational activity to be held on Thursday, July 22, 1982. 3. The Parks and Recreation Department shall provide transportation to and from the project site form the following sites: a. Pilot Knob School d. Rahn Park b. Oak Chase Park e. Cedar School c. Thomas Lake School f. Woodhaven Park 4. Terms and Conditions: a. Five projects will be conducted on Thursdays beginning June 17 and ending on July 15, 1982 between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 2:30 P.M. b. In the event that said is ill on a project day, he/she will call the Parks and Recreation Department 454-7802 no later than 8:15 A.M. c. Each participant shall bring his/her own lunch. The lunch break will occur between 11:30,= Noon. d. Participants are to wear shoes not sandals or clogs, long pants and sleeves. Gloves and a hat are'suggested. e. One make up day will be provided on Tuesday, July 20, 1982 for partici- pants who have one day to make-up. f. More than one absence terminates the contract immediately. g. Undisciplined behavior on the part of a participant will result in the contract being terminated. S. Projects to be accomplished are: June 17 - June 24 - July 1 - July 8 - July Is - 6., Rainy day alternatives �# 1 R 2 0 3 7. Describe any medical problems you have: Phone ✓t (Si ped (Date) Address: City State Zip 17 (Signed Supervisor Teen Volunteer/Work Progrm LSigned Director of FirKS ec) • CITY OF EAGAN• Draft PARKS E RECREATION APPLICATION TEEN VOLUNTEER/WORK PROGRAM Date: Name Last First Middle Address City State Zip Phone N Physical Record: What physical Please describe Date of Birth Month Day Year conditios do you have such as allergies, hay fever etc? In case of emergency notify: Name Day time phone.number Education Name F, Location Years Attended Favorite Subject Elementary Junior High or Middle School High School References: Name 3 persons you have known at least oneyear, not relatives or your friend, Name Address Telephone Years Acquainted 1. 2. 3. Interests: What you do in your spare time Hobbies Clubs you belong to A subject you study on your own Why do you want to participate in this program? (signed) date 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Five CONSE!NT-ITEMS. There are a total of six (6) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any item in further detail, that item should be removed from the consent agenda and placed under additional items unless the discussion required is brief. DISTRUCTION OF BOND ISSUES A. Reconciliation and certification of Distruction for Bond Issues -- The Director of Finance has solicited proposals from each bank acting as a paying agent for City bond issues to reconcile and then destroy all paid bonds and coupons on all City bond issues. To date, the City has received a response from only First Bank of St. Paul. Their cost to provide this service is $2.00 per bond and $.15 per coupon. Currently, the City must sort and store all bonds and then have a qualified person from a bank come out at a fee and expense to the City to verify reconcile and destruct the bond issue. Even with the sorting and storing that we currently go through, the City has no record at all of which bonds and coupons have been paid and which are outstanding since the City maintains no register of any sort. In addition, the City Hall does not have adequate storage for these records. The Director of Finance, with the concurrence of the City Administrator, is recommending that the City Council enter into an agreement with all paying agents to provide this service and further that the City Council approve the providing of this service at the time of all new issues. Enclosed on page Z,O is a sample agreement relating to the recon- ciliation and destruction as provided by the First Bank of St. Paul. The Director of Finance and City Administrator will coordi- nate this type of agreement with all future paying agents on all future bond projects. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve and direct the Director of Finance to proceed with an agreement allowing paying agents to perform reconciliation and certification of destruction for bond issues. /9 4111First Sagc 0 Saint Paul The First National Bank of Saint Paul 332 Minnesota Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55iol • AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE RECONCILIATION AND CERTIFICATION OF DESTRUCTION This agreement is between the (The Municipality) and the First Bank Saint Paul (The Paying Agent). Under terms of agreement dated the First Bank Saint Paul is Paying Agent on the bonds dated _ By this agreement, the municipality has further authorized the Paying Agency to perform a reconciliation and destruction certification function. Under this function, the Paying Agent will at least twice a year, furnish the a certificate of reconciliation and destruction stating the following: 1. Maturity Date 2. Dollar amount of coupons paid and destroyed 3. Dollar amount of bonds paid and destroyed 4. Balance on hand 5. Coupon numbers and bond numbers outstanding Upon agreement between the Municipality and the Paying Agent, the Paying Agent will start the reconciliation and certification function for the next maturity date. The function will not apply to the maturities previous to the agreement date. The Municipality and the Paying Agent have caused this agreement to be executed in their respective names and their duly authorized representatives. FIRST BANK SAINT PAUL 0 Member First Bank System MUNICIPALITY 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Six ST. JOHN NEUMANN FOR TEMPORARY BEER & GAMBLING LICENSE B. Temporary Non -Intoxicating Liquor and Bingo License for St. John Neumann Church -- An application was applied for by the Knights of Columbus for a temporary non -intoxicating liquor and bingo license for a March 28, 1982 event. In researching the reason why an annual bingo or gambling license is not applied for by St. John Neumann Church, the reason was given as a matter of economics. An annual license is $200 and a temporary event license is $10. St. John Neumann Church does not have twenty events during a year; and, therefore, by applying for an individual license, it is a savings to the church. There is some additional administrative time for the City staff; however, the 3.2 beer license would have to be applied for anyway and the process of the bingo license in addition to the non -intoxicating liquor license is not much addi- tional work for staff. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve the non -intoxi- cating liquor license and bingo license for St. John Neumann Church. PROJECT 323A C. Project 323A, Receive Final Assessment Roll (Coachman Land Company First Addition) -- Construction has been completed and final payment has been made to the contractor for the installation of public utilities for the above referenced subdivision. All costs associated with this project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll has been prepared. All costs associated with this project are being assessed to benefited properties with the exception of $3,913.63 that is being billed directly to the developer for costs incurred beyond that amount bonded for by the City for additions to the contract at the specific written request of the developer. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 323A (Coachman Land Company First Addition Utilities) and order the final assessment hearing to be held April 20, 1982. PROJECT 336A D. Project 336A, Receive Final Assessment Roll (Tomark First Addition) -- All construction associated with the construction of utilities for the Tomark First Addition has been completed and all costs associated with the construction and overhead have been tabulated. All costs associated with this project will be assessed against the benefited properties. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 336A (Tomark First Addition Utilities) and order the final assessment hearing to be held April 20, 1982. 2) 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Seven JOHNSON'S .FIRST ADDITION - REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS E. Johnson's First Addition, Reapportionment of Special Assessments -- Johnson's First Addition incorporated two unplatted parcels, both generally located in the northest quadrant of the intersection of Nicols Road and Kings Road. Johnson's First Addition had the final plat approved on September 4, 1979, but it has never been recorded. This reapportionment of special assessment was the last remaining requirement before the City would execute the final plat document to allow it to be recorded. Because this reapportionment provides for the levy of special assessments on a newly created lot by special agreement without the formal public hearing process, the staff feels that formal approval of this reapportionment should be obtained by specific Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: Approve or deny the reappor- tionment of special assessments associated with street improvement along Kings Road over Lots 1 and 2 of Johnson's First Addition. OVERHILL FARM FIRST ADDITION - REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS F. Overhill Farm Addition, Reapportionment of Special Assessments -- With the final plat approval of the Overhill Farm First Addition, Outlot B has been created and transferred to the City for park purposes. One of the City's requirements in accepting park land dedication is that it be free and clear of all taxes and special assessments. Developers requested that the special assessments associated with this Outlot B park land be reapportioned to Outlot A of Overhill Farm First Addition. The developer has agreed to the waiver of all hearings necessary to provide for this additional assessment to be levied against Outlot A and it is now being pre- sented for formal Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the reapportionment of special assessments from Outlot B to Outlot A of the Overhill Farm First Addition. ZZ 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Eight CIVIL DEFENSE WARNING SIREN LOCATIONS A. Civil Defense Warning Siren Locations -- During 1981, four (4) civil defense warning sirens were installed at various locations in the City of Eagan. The City was provided an option to purchase additional warning sirens at the same cost as bid for the original warning sirens. As a part of the 1982 budget, the City Council approved the purchase of four (4) additional warning sirens to be installed in 1982. With eight (8) warning sirens installed throughout the community, a vast majority and great percentage of the residents living in Eagan would be covered with the warning sirens. The City has budgeted approximately $41,000 in the general fund to purchase civil defense warning sirens in 1982. The City Administrator sent out a letter to approximately twenty property owners who represent areas around four (4) different locations within the City informing them of an informational meeting to be held on March 9, 1982 at which time the County's and City's Civil Defense Directors would provide background information on the pro- posed site locations. Only two (2) adjoining residents.were present for the hearing. The City Administrator will provide background information regarding the civil defense warning sirens and Mr. Doug Reid, Civil Defense Director, and Dale Grimes, Dakota County Civil Defense Emergency Preparedness Director, will be present to answer any questions regarding the locations proposed for the civil defense warning sirens. These locations will again be re- viewed on a large map at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the four (4) locations for civil defense warning sirens within the community and authorize a purchase order for the aforementioned sirens. a3 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Nine 0 0 OLD BUSINESSh WATER TREATMENT PLANT A. Water Treatment Plant -- During the summer of 1981, the Council elected to initiate action pertaining to a water treatment plant to define a specific course of action regarding this potential water quality treatment facility. In response to that directive the staff directed the consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates to prepare a report analysing the needs of the City as to the size, location and type of facility for consideration by the Council. In conjunction with the prepara- tion of that report, the City staff prepared a City-wide survey format which was mailed out with the fall 1981 newsletter to try to receive a response from the general public pertaining to any problems they may have experienced with the present quality of water within the City. In October of 1981, the results of this survey were tabulated and presented to the Council on December 1, 1981. In addition, the water treatment plant report prepared by the consulting engineer was also submitted. With this informa- tion, the City Council elected to hold a public hearing on January 28, 1982 to present the results of the survey and the preliminary report to the general public. At this public hearing on January 28, the Council received additional input from the general public. They then closed the public hearing and continued consideration of this item until March 16, 1982. On March 11, the public works committee discussed the water treatment plant proposal and their comments and recommendations can be found within the report per- taining to the public works committee meeting forwarded to the Council's attention on pages /155' through jig as a part of the Informational Memo by the City-dministrator. After reviewing the results of the survey information returned by the community, comments of the public hearing and the general consensus of the phone calls that staff receives during the normal working days, it is apparent that there is no desire nor request for the City to construct a centralized hardness reduction treat- ment plant within the City. However, the City staff still continues to receive calls from concerned citizens pertaining to poor water quality resulting from high iron and manganese content. When the staff was directed to prepare a feasibility report pertaining to a water treatment plant facility, they had to take into consideration both a separate hardness reduction plant and an iron/manganese removal treatment plant with future expansion/conversion capabili- ties for a potential future hardness reduction facility. Subse- quently, the costs associated with this facility could not be as refined as if staff were looking at one specific water treatment facility to handle iron/manganese removal only. If hardness a4 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Ten reduction is to be eliminated from future consideration for water treatment, the staff would like to have an opportunity to perform a more detailed cost estimate to construct an iron/manganese removal treatment plant only of adequate size to meet the minimum needs of this community. Once this is performed, the final cost estimates may be more in line with the potential benefit that can be derived. The staff would then like to have the opportunity to present this information back to the general public in another newsletter survey informing the community of the results of the past survey and the refined costs associated with iron/manganese removal only. With this information, the staff feels that a more accurate response could be obtained for the Council's information pertaining to the community's desires for such a facility. The Director of Public Works is requesting that the Council give heavy consideration to the desires of the existing residents in the community in addition to strong consideration for what type of water quality they want to provide for future citizens of this community in addition to potential future commercial and industrial development in this community. The Public Works Department is concerned about future water conservation measures that may be mandated by the state and/or federal governments restricting the City's ability to continue the practice of flushing water mains down the storm sewer to eliminate a water quality problem that could more effectively and efficiently be handled by a water treat- ment facility. The Public Works Director and Public Works Committee will be availa- ble to discuss in further detail possible recommendations for Coun- cil consideration or action on March 16, 1982. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a water treatment facility or authorize staff to prepare a supplementary report and subsequent survey for future distribution. as 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Eleven APPOINTMENTS TO JOINT CABLE COMMISSION B. Appointments to Joint Burnsville/Eagan Cable Television Com- mission -- At the March 2, 1982 City Council meeting, a joint powers agreement was adopted between the Cities of Eagan and Burnsville to establish a cable communications commission. According to Article 6, Section 2, each City Council shall appoint by resolution four (4) directors, at least one of whom shall be a City Council Member and the other three shall be residents of the member, or the City of Eagan. Each City Council, according to Section 3, shall also appoint one (1) alternate to the commission. Therefore, it will be necessary for the City of Eagan to make five (5) appoint- ments to the cable commission. These appointments can be more than one (1) City Council Member but must be at least one City Council Member. Those cable members expressing interest at the March 11, 1982 Cable Television Advisory Committee meeting were Barry Tilley, Lloyd Krob, Ron Voracek, Bob Peterson, Rick Bertz, and City Council Members Jim Smith and Tom Egan. Cable Television Advisory Committee Members who would not be interested in serving on the commission are Steve Mattson, Charles Shults, Mayor Bea Blomquist and City Councilmembers Ted Wachter and Jerry Thomas. Absent members of the committee (George Fryman, Mark Parranto and Dale Hagert) will be contacted by the City Administrator to deter- mine if they would be interested in serving on the commission and that information will be given to you before the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To appoint five members to the cable television advisory joint powers commission for the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan. WINKLER DEVELOPMENT - PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BLUFFVIEW C. Winkler Development for Rezoning from GB to PD to Allow an Office Complex -Hotel -Motel -High Rise -- A public hearing was held by the APC at the January 26, 1982 meeting to consider two (2) applications submitted to the City by Winkler Development Company which are as follows: A request to rezone approximately 17 acres from GB to PD to include a motel -hotel -office -high rise complex in uses which are permitted in the GB category. 2. A request for preliminary plat for Bluffview Plaza Develop- ment consisting of approximately 17 acres. The APC had continued the action on this item until the February 23, 1982 meeting, pending a recommendation by the subcommittee studying height limitations. The APC did take action at the Febru- ary 25, 1982 meeting to recommend approval of the planned unit development zoning, however felt there was not enough detail in the preliminary plat and continued any action on the preliminary plat for Bluffview until a detailed preliminary plat outlining the first phase of development was presented to the APC. For 26 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Twelve additional information on the project, refer to pages 67 through 74 of the March 2, 1982 packet. Action that was taken by the City Council at the March 2, 1982 meeting consisted of a basic concept approval of a hotel -motel at that location; however, due to the fact that Independent School District #191 was inadvertantly left off the abstractor's list for notification of the public hearing and had requested an opportunity to at least review the plans, the issue concerning a rezoning from GB to PD as recommended by the APC was continued until the March 16, 1982 meeting. A copy of the response presented to the City of Eagan by Independent School District #191 is found on pages Al through : For additional information regarding the rezoning from agricultural to a business use on that property, the records at City Hall indicate that the formerly owned Perrin property which consisted of 36.73 acres and consists of all of the 17 acres in question was zoned from A, agri- cultural, to C-2, the heaviest commercial zoning in 1963, speci- fically October 15, 1963.1 John Metcalf School was rezoned from C-2 (Commercial Property) to Public Facilities zoning on May 4, 1966. That school was opened in the fall of 1966 for educational purposes. Enclosed on page _ p is a copy of zoning uses permitted a under a GB classification nd an explanation of uses under a PD classification. The issue to be addressed at the March 16, 1982 meeting is the rezoning request. Any further consideration regarding height limitations for a building greater than three stories is not possi- ble until the final amendment changes have been made to Ordinance 52 and a specific application has been received from the developer and a public hearing is held before the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a conditional use permit and preliminary plat defining specific plans for any development including a building of greater than three (3) stories. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the Advisory Planning Commission to approve a rezoning from GB to PD of approximately 17 acres proposed for development by the Winkler Development Company. a� 0 BURNSVILLE•EAGAN•SAVAGE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 9 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES CENTER March 11, 1982 The Honorable Bea Blomquist Mayor of Eagan Municipal Offices 3795 Pilot Knob road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor Blomquist: Last evening the School Board reviewed the proposed rezoning from General Business to Planned Development of property across the street from Metcalf Junior High and came to the conclusion that the District should oppose the rezoning until a definitive development plan is available that would enable us to determine the impact on students attending Metcalf Junior High. The motion adopted by the School Board is as follows: MOVED BY Director Bonin, seconded by Director Coskran that the School District be on record as opposed to rezoning this parcel of land due to the lack of definite plans for development and its possible effect on the school. Motion carried 4-2. The Board's concerns relate primarily to the safety of students and include the following: 1. Traffic - It appears that a Planned Development might generate a greater volume of traffic than development for General Business purposes. Anxiety was expressed with respect to traffic volume, patterns, and control, as well as implications for convenient access to the Junior High School. Some of these concerns could be partially addressed through control measures such as semaphores, school crossing lights, or a divided road- way to prevent vehicles from making left turns out of the development. 2. Types of Business to Be Constructed - An effort should be made to prohibit construction of businesses that would be an attractive nuisance for students or, con- versely, that would be adversely affected by a large number of teenagers in the area. Sale of liquor in close proximity to the school causes some apprehension as well; however, location and proper controls might alleviate this fear. 100 RIVER RIDGE COURT • BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 • 16121881.. 7 300 0 0 3. Upgrading of County Road 30 - Should increased traffic on County Road 30 warrant upgrading of the roadway, we would certainly object strenuously to condemnation of school property for this purpose or special assessments levied to pay for the improvements. As you can see, the Board's opposition to the proposed rezoning is directly related to concern for the safety and well-being of students attending Metcalf Junior High. When detailed plans are available, we would appreciate an opportunity to review them so that the impact on our school children can be assessed. Please accept our appreciation for the courtesy that you extended in postponing your action until the Board had an opportunity to consider this matter. Thank you for your continuing cooperation in our mutual efforts to serve the community. Sincerely, T. W. Foot Superintendent of Schools TWF/bh Carbons enclosed: Council Members Tom Hedges, City Administrator IX9 0 0 MESO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY •.� • r • • iar ra` DATE: MARCH 12, 1982 r a as a�• • ia. r r i ia�r r � • • is General Business Districts are designed for heavy use and businesses which serve other businesses and industry. Permitted uses within the General Bus- iness District include: Offices Lumber, heating and plumbing shops; small engine appliance/repair wholesale office, sales or showrooms for household goods Bawling alley, tennis club, skating, theater, archery and other enclosed recreational facility Car wash, auto accessory sales, motor vehicle sales Buildings having storage facilities Rental shops Animal hospital TV --radio stations Stone/monument sales Private clubs, lodges or health clubs Armories - convention hall Research testing laboratories Garden store Bicycle, boat, motorcycle and snowmobile sales and service Printing business The permitted uses must be operated within a building. Conditional uses may be granted within "GB" zoning and many address the outside operation of per- mitted uses. • The Planned Development District represents supplementary zoning and does have precedence over underlying zoning. The City Council makes the dete=- nation as to what the planned development will include. The "PD" must adapt to the physical and aesthetic setting better than the "GB". The "PD" must be economically feasible. The "PD must benefit the community to a greater de- gree than would development of "GB". The City Council will not approve a "PD" preliminary plan without a planned development agreement. TLH/jach 30 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Thirteen DCCF INC. FOR WAIVER OF PLAT A. D. C. C. F. Inc. (Arnold A. Carlson) for a Waiver of Plat to Move a Lot line 13' for Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd, and Lot 7, Block 1, Wilderness Park 3rd -- An application was submitted to the City and a public hearing held by the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a waiver of plat to move a lot line 13 feet for Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd Addition, and Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition, in Section 27. The APC is recom- mending approval of the waiver of plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Assistant's report, a copy of which is enclosed on pages3g� through � s for your reference. For a copy of the APC minutes, rear to page -g(C. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: recommendation of the Advisory Planning waiver of plat for DCCF, Inc. 31 To approve or deny the Commission to approve a • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT C� APPLICANT: D.C.C.F. INC. - ARNOLD A. CARTSON LOCATION EXISTING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF REPORT REPORTED BY APPLICATION SUBMITM PART OF THE NW; OF SECTION 27 1125 AQUARIUS IANE R-1 (RESIDENTIAL SINGE DISTRICT) FEBRI ARY 25, 1982 FEBRUARY 16, 1982 DAVE M. OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT An application has been submitted for a waiver of plat to move a lot line 13' for Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd Addition and Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition located in Section 27. At the present time, there is a house located on Lot 25, Block 4 of the Wilderness Park 2nd Addition. A swimming pool and retaining wall were also constructed in the backyard of this lot. However, both the swimming pool and retaining wall were inadvertently built 13' over the lot line thus encroaching onto Lot 7, Block 2 of the Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. At the present time, there is no house located on Lot 7, Block 2 of the Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. At the present time, there is a 10' drainage and utility easement that is cen- tered on the boundary of Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd Addition and Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. Thus, the sainming pool and re- taining wall are encroaching on the drainage and utility easements. Therefore, the City will require a new easement so as to allow for the necessary 10' ease- ment on this site. If approved, the waiver of plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) A new site plan must be submitted with the revised grading and contours to show the water runoff from Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. 2) The site plan must also include the proposed location of the new 10' ease- ment. 3) An executed easement document moist be prepared and submitted to City staff. 4) All other applicable City ordinances shall be complied with. DM/jack 3� I'lL NORTH LINE OF S112 OF SE.1/41 OF N.E. 1/4 SEC. 27 330.36 N 89056'38"E a % 0, 0 a kz w 0 ZP, A=90002'07" O 94,28 AioiiLe 0 0 mm 0 Z f2 Ajo a r�l 120.42 1., 12044 1. S 89057 28 W S89057'28"W ;- - le 6 7�m OD 30 0 30 135.25 057 28'W S8 'e; AIDUARIUS 0 j Nago 70. .;6504 2811 57" %8');,5F-28 E 0 La 0 0 E LANE. 2 2i M 0 w too. 10539u ! 0d I 135.27 S89057 28 W OyV CL IT C) 4b 0 0 2 0 Pet W- f CID C4 0 0 0 0 00 "4 1. 1� -% I 62 kmsc. P0.434 N S, P. �IEASEMEN[Tj PK. 135.30 SOUTH Ul 0000 : 104 97 S.E. 1/4 Of ;jp S89ft7'78*V o 204.97 lei S8905T'28"W - --------- r: p N '73 PUN R C.44, L DEI �INNESOT 4VALLH' SURVEYOR '&; XINEER ' CORP. ' .. 4 , .. -1001 EAST CUFF FIDAD t4_ / ;'t ��l00 NORTHEAST FOURTH STREET KMNSVUIJL Ai1NMEWTA Saw'! i ,p rr,, 7 GRAND RAPIDS, MINNESO rA 55744 "f ' a„ ir r P110Nti.�12: �7 rr • ".'; r p�10NE: (215) Jt6-052B a ,.�� :.-^ Certl[iate.gt$11n1q for .:• 'r-' ; 1 iMl�pERA/ES PARK<_SECOND.`'ADD/T/DN, ''f= C'OUNT'Y; • INNESOTA . ' f .�ii:e 2v. i.'%? ^ � i . a iy} ,� ♦ 1 ,:.` n i, .:kc � • - im '' t' • - /30.00 .... -- ``` I _`� 4`. .. ••. AAA,a A:A: �a O.S wide /09 ieieininy wo//s1 .. _1 House not shown a b': 811rq -. 46 t .. Y� droinoye and oi/ity eosement-i r !' Colxrete Curb O �;:.,• 1.4 it AQUARIUS LANE ' :JAN T NIDIUN AND k ri- •TURID' P'rA MIDTUN „G... !• 1125•'AQU4R1US LANE Niel mfm iia? amm-enwr ' EA6itK MN`r 55 121 WW aatGly that this is a true and correct repreaelltatlan W • attnas M lM 1pOwWAr4a o1 the above daaerlbad land, and of the location o1 IMdbjftr thereon. and all visible eoaeacNrrlu. H Only. has deN :, iT 3i %� s. _• :+ _- " + I�»y� by no this /O +" day of Morch '' + � ]teCt T+�A/M�f %.SO.rMwv ILLS. ,pat►. No PF.l' S •y is MJ�y`^r..� a 'y� :4y `4' .. A. ' 3 a R-3 ',", .. ~hi�'�' > `t•r�-,� �., ,, 4f,�~�„y��y, ;,e -i,.. O ` PF y/Y J t (, I ��c'S i seJ,E�."C�Rr'�• t NRR-3/��;, >�t �.��.,_ - - q ._._._ RTI. PF.. 1• f - PF IF`F e��, 1, :.�. x Gam' _ Wj fA :� �C. � int?.•: 1 PKC. PF ,,,. • 1 .) t:iu.ri^.m ter.') •4 c%d 11 r . •.. t C q P K .,, A f , 17 PF - - . R-1 )•J%) r`°Ri” y, • )Jl �e`yl`3' AT !eJ jh,.•NJT J.). u'� ly O M- ,:,).i JS r17J �, r, e j.PF on '�- PARKVIEW ',)v ))a; 2 , �.,}-.rdr'J'�),..• "k+•S• '7} r •trl•, S- GOLF j ♦J . ji: JS�> JJ,SIJ?,`'ii.�/}, 9� (� t V•�rJ I jJri rte+, J<� [• ••�� L) 1i •iiw) V A.) 1 J .J• j— rA)) �} 7yr} 1 iS i,. _ 1 COURSE A>rJx l,.'y •' J��.f )'.�, (i•.j� "i � r +.�+ L� �,� {.�i�t �)j-a,..),:!. .})•3. 1i. ))s )�)'J �).!+)+.',J. , JJt'.J1 1 •. ypi.)v� JaJ � ij �''..�.•) •-•Sy.:%.9 i v J% •JJ )J. �.Jr�� jt7`;),Af M)'J. '. M r ,')Sv'�,)+� � Uj) J�)� f 'i)J 3 ,.•l.r� �,,, ..:j�sJ•Ir 1 )3 )"r�. ") j •`?i Y 1 Ix •,,3' �+ t ,C! )) ..11 a? l i') �). � )J,_ � .1r1) rl � .•.+'� 3'))�J i') vi.r �) � -1 7V l. �•. l .. t ... r't .. -+-..aJ., , ):-. •fir'\L WILDERNESS PARR 3RD ADDITION - WAIVER OF PLAT The hearing was then convened regarding the application of D.C.C.F. Inc. and Arnold Carlson for waiver of plat to move' a lot line 13 feet for Lot 25, Block 4, Wilderness Park 2nd Addition and Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. It was noted a swimming pool and retaining wall had been inadver- tently constructed over 13 feet of Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addi- tion, and the owners were requesting a waiver of plat in order to revise the lot line. It was also noted that the swimming pool and retaining wall were encroaching on drainage and utility easements and vacation of existing ease- ments would be required. Mr. Carlson appeared and there were no objections. Wilkins moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the applica- tion subject to the following conditions: 1. A new site plan must be submitted and approved with the revised grading and contours to show the water runoff from Lot 7, Block 2, Wilderness Park 3rd Addition. 2. The site plan must also include the proposed location of the new 10 foot easement. 3. An executed easement document must be prepared and submitted to City staff for recording. 4. The existing encroaching drainage and utility easements shall be vacated. 5. All other applicable City ordinances shall be complied with, in- cluding compliance with all platting requirements. All voted in favor. 36 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Fourteen NATIONAL AMUSEMENT CO. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT B. National Amusement Co. for a Conditional Use to Allow More than 3 Amusement Devices in CSC District Located in a Portion of the Cedarvale Shopping Center -- An application was received for more than three (3) amusement devices for a business to be located at Cedarvale Shopping Center. A public hearing was held to consider the conditional use permit by the APC at a regular meeting held on February 25, 1982. There were a number of merchants present at the APC objecting to the conditional use permit. A letter of objection was received by the City from DCR Company and also a petition from several merchants in the Cedarvale Shopping Center objecting to a permit for amusement devices at Cedarvale Shopping Mall was received at the APC meeting. Copies of those petitions are enclosed on pages 3 through ±4 _ for your review. The Advisory Planning Commission s recommending denial of the condi- tional use permit to the City Council. For additional information regarding this item, please refer to the Planning Assistant's report which is enclosed on pages—¢I through for your review. For action that was taken by te APC, refer to page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the Advisory Planning Commission recommending denial of the conditional use permit to allow greater than three amusement devices for a business at Cedarvale Shopping Center. 37 CEDARVALE LANES 3883 Beau D'Rue Drive Eagan, Minnesota 55122 �.. City of Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Gentlemen: 0 DCR COMPANY 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 February 19, 1982 We have been notified that you intend to discuss the issuing of a Game Room license in the mall of Cedarvale Shopping Center on Thursday, February 25. We strenuously object to the issuing of this license for two basic reasons: 1. Our experience of Cedarvale Lanes has certainly shown us that direct supervision of these game rooms is necessary. We do not believe this supervision would be evident in the proposed game room area. 2. The City recently issued a license for a game room in the old A b W facility. Issuing another license in an area as close as this would, in our opinion, be too great a concentration of such facilities. CEDARVALE LANES Sincerely, M DCR COMPANY ichard I Stryker, Pr ident FEBRUARY �, 1982 The undersigned,being owners and operators of retail establishments in Cedarvale Shopping Center, do hereby petition the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission and City Council in opposition to the application of National Amusement Company for approval of a permit for amusement devices in the Cedar - vale Shopping Mall for reasons including the following: 1. The stores in the center have been experiencing serious theft problems in recent years and it is feared more will result with an increase in young people. 2. The shopping mall owners are not able to have full time policing which may become necessary in light of the hours proposed for the game room. 3. We are concerned about whether the person we understand has been chosen to manage the game room will be capable of properly supervising the younger patrons. 4. We have received information that other game rooms in Eagan have experienced policing problems and believe this could be detrimental to the retail shops in Cedarvale Mall. 5. We feel strongly that if the City approves the permit, it should be given only temporary approval which could be revoked after three or six months trial if complaints or problems arise. 3`I 0 0 FEBRUARY :l 1.982 The undersigned, being owners and operators of retail establishments in Cedarvale Shopping Center, do hereby petition the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission and City Council in opposition to the application of National Amusement Company for approval of a permit for amusement devices in the Cedar - vale Shopping Nall for reasons including the following: 1. The stores in the center have been experiencing serious theft problems in recent years and it is feared more will result with an increase in young people. 2. The shopping mall owners are not able to have full time policing which may become necessary in light of the hours proposed for the game room. 3. We are concerned about whether the person we understand has been chosen to manage the game room will be capable of properly supet;vising the younger patrons. ... _ ;,1,b..•, .. 4. We have received information that other game rooms in Eagan have experienced policing problems and believe this could be detrimental to the retail shops in Cedarvale Nell. 5. We feel strongly that if the City approves the.permit, it should be given only temporary approval which could be revoked after three or six months trial if complaints or problems arise. 40 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITICNAL USE PERMIT/AMUSEM?r DEVICES APPLICANT: NATIONAL AWSEMENT COMPANY - SAM NIIBA LOCATION: PORTION OF c EDAR ALE SHOppiM SER SATED IN PART OF THE NF}; OF SECTION 19 EXISTING ZONING: CSC (CcmmLvITY SHOPPING CEN=) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBKMW 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 10, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVE M. OSBF.RG, PIANNING ASSISTANP An application has been submitted requesting a conditional use permit in order to have more than 3 amusement devices in a CSC District (Canmz ity Shopping Center) located in the Cedarvale Shopping Center. At the present time, the National Amusement Canpany has three video games and several children's rides in the Cedarvale Shopping Center. The applicant is pro- posing to locate the three video games in a now vacant roan in the Cedarvale Shop- ping Center, and also to add 9-12 more video games in the room. The dimensions of this amusement game arcade are approximately 12' x 12', which the applicant feels is large enough to house the 12-15 video games that will be in the arcade. There are plans to have adult supervision in the roan at all times. No food, smo- king or drinking of any kind will be allowed in that amusement game arcade. The amusement game arcade will, at no time, remain open past 10 P.M. as the hours in which the amusement game arcade will be open will be dependent somewhat on the hours of the entire Cedarvale Shopping Center. If approved, the conditional use permit should be subject to the following condi- tions: 1. Fulfilling all requirements of Ordinance #73, Amusement Devices DMO/jach 4( D A PARKING PARKING 1 f • 1 f T V i 1 v I 1 'l'1 u`• �-'I^' CMCIUMC`•CJ'YI I u l I l l I• ' .�,R+n-. 7..,... ��';:\f, pis... i� � •�•�� N�— �;�--f � 5r,. .,,: 1•'r"• cji? t, :r � i:i:. :9t/,.;t,• .. _i 1.. , — �...( ',(r'(,,. ..;1—..:i S �� L;,, .. r.;,l V. .d• a.4.•1' .1•{t:�f�: rR::1' •' .;I 'a f�-: ,�,: .S`/i,�}- '7C r .� � •\. �•� -�!• •>,.j'•'��5' I - ac �•. t�.+.' aI ;•a:�, „'.1., :'.�.4 r•:S�d:I.�ra-.'�1'I.II' 1` '.. ."t :. l;•i �_ • w _ • C. � � :r •8r'r41: ' l (� .�' c�`f �,. L}'., 1.I• �..._ '�.:. .. �,•• 11 ' • %.<• if•' "-:i .lai '. lL. �: j •:4�.._ 1.(A�`1 I.: `iil ..�1t. ..i.'�• H•—i is 1.1�(�. .i �' ��1� .; It. .t•� •,•� �,��1.):��: I: );� ;�} .:�>.� .%1:�1. R•l'�'..`I. rl..l hw�. 'y3: i.T•S :•i �7-� •:': L.4.1 e: }%.. {�A.t. �� .. f '�.• ;r•� w t'a: ?. : '� 2 ' -, �y Y. /� f ..,. / ••s.i._:' 'A_.• E' ��':.-` 1:• �,w :. tL 'n' ti • \•��';:.,.'(`' ': „ •+ •,>• •,i:i+"il `�^tea �t�:}� ` ! s � ,,.a:Jr.'.-� •I .:�aw•'• �. ti••r5. 9.ti� 1 � 1 .. :,.. :,:•.' 1 •: I,.:; •• Sj.</a#�:'\'•I c+v:•r.C.. 1 1'•- ..� l(�''i ).��.,t. �:.. ., �a\�'S{. ::.: .r: �, "i-': :,,. :57�;. � �: t �'� \ i♦ 5, 1. '1 •!. 1.r. •F. :� • f� �•'f ••.•Ju.. .S 1. + 4'i� .T .. �''\� ..: r t _ 7-•..ne.� 4' 1 1 L. 1 '� 1,.•i mj'c•.�,:., .r.,t . �.�:, �M�aN.' o�.�i..•.i.. -C• •. ,• _ is--��K,_L}Lav'}iV'/"'i—^ •,r—_;�"a�.:•k�{'!?s.': ♦¢V` f-!•�{. .,a: _ **LQI czl 4� uci � 1 • p�i�� RIG i'OW ►car , y l PARKING PARKING .. I 47-4 p �. � R-4 LI q Ll LI G t LI — 'n. SILL \ La ibD i LB - VA (S� r. I� LI CSC •I , • CSC PF R-4 I OAR Ll R-ICAnrl :. An NFt G B Alt �r1KT tis EEN T PF; . ...,,.,.,,... PF JUNIOn - !NB ' tiPF 0 NB is HIGH B T i B-2 SCHOOL O r t , r Q 1 I _lav P \R-3C 3i 1 •6R ; rT R�•,E - _ �K 4 I Sv ��,�', PK•ifs, ,r�:•Lr--��E�'�'r. ; ..; ,:,.r. MARI R-4 CSC .<,c ; ....:...:^ .. n...,i ��,,,al, 0 0 NATIONAL AMUSEMENT COMPANY - AMUSEMENT DEVICE PERMIT The public hearing regarding the application of National Amusement Company and Sam Nilba for conditional use permit for more than 3 amusement devices in the Cedarvale Shopping Center was opened by the Chairman. Mr. Nilba was present as was Ron Dicker for the applicant. At the present time, National Amusement Company has three video games and several children's rides in Cedarvale Shopping Center and now proposes to locate 12 to 15 video games in a separate store location in the Center. The plan is for adult supervision in the room at all times, and no food, smoking or drinking of any kind would be allowed in the arcade. Mr. Nilba indicated that the amusement games have been located in the Center for many years and that the Center would be super- vised at all times. Allen Hoohsprung appeared and presented a Petition on behalf of 21 of approximately 35 retail merchants in the mall objecting strongly to the proposal. They were concerned about the possibility of inade- quate supervision and inability to control the young people that would be using the machines, the impact that the machines do have on minors and the adverse potential impact on the retail stores with excessive numbers of minors in the Center. A number of other shop owners were present in opposition. Mr. Nilba assured the commission that supervision would be adequate and if there was any problem, the landlord has a provision in the lease whereby the land- lord could close the arcade after a 15 day notice. He also asked for a 30 -day trial period and if there were problems, that he would then close the arcade. There were also concerns by persons present, including Planning Commission members, about the impact 'on the A & W Amusement Device Center located about one block to the west and also the bowling alley and it is understood that there have been problems in both locations. A letter from DCH Company and the owner of the Cedarvale Lanes objecting to the application also was submitted. Lloyd Krob explained that he had done extensive research regarding the amuse- ment centers and was concerned about their adverse impact upon minors and read miscellaneous articles from magazines and newspapers explaining the problems that have resulted in such centers. He further stated that members of the Eagan Police Department are concerned about the machines in other amusement device locations and it would be a deterrent to business in the shopping center. After extended discussion, Krob moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend denial of the application based upon the reasons that are out- lined above. All voted in favor. 4'i- 0 • Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Fifteen PRELIMINARY PLAT - LEXINGTON PLACE C. U. S. Homes Corporation for a Preliminary Plat (Lexington Place) Consisting of Approximately 4.62 Acres -- An application was re- ceived for a preliminary plat entitled Lexington Place consisting of approximately 84.62 Acres and Containing 28 condominium buildings for a total of 672 dwelling units. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the preliminary plat subject to condi- tions as outlined in the staff report. For a copy of the City ' Planner's report, refer to pages � through S 9 It was noted that the applicant is proposing to construct 26 twenty-four unit buildings with a variable mix of studio, one -bedroom and two-bedroom units. The APC noted that the parcel was presently zoned R-4 and that they could be considerably higher than what the applicant has proposed. The APC was concerned with the pricing of the units as proposed by Orrin Thompson which he quoted at $40,000 and up. Because some of the condominium units were defined "efficiency" and approximately 400 square feet in size, this raised an issue in the minds of the residents of the surrounding area. The City Administrator did direct a question to the City Attorney's office regarding regulation by the City as to the size of condominium units. This issue is addressed on page{, in a letter from the City Attorney's office. For additionlnformation on the action that was taken by the APC, refer to the APC minutes found on pages_ through 6 _J3_ I Enclosed on page 64 is the recom- mendation of the Advisory Park & Recreation Committee concerning this proposed development. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Lexington Place as recommended for approval by the APC. 4S 0 • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - LEXINGTON PLACE APPLICANT: U. S. H(WES CORPORATICN - ORRIN THCMPSON LOCATION: 105 OF THE SW; OF SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25., 1982 DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY W04 0; k1 NZ 61 FEBRUARY 17, 1982 DALE C. R[MM, CITY PLANNER An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat, Lexington Place, which consists of approximately 84.62 acres and contains 28 condominium buildings for a total of 672 dwelling units. Z=IG AND LAND USE Presently, the site is zoned R-4 (Residential Multiple District) which would al- low only multiple dwellings. According to Ordinance #52, the density could range between 12 and 22 dwelling units per acre. The proposed land use shows the area north of Duckwood Drive as _R-3 (Mixed Residential) with a density of 6-12 dwelling units per acre, and south of Duckwood Drive is indicated on the Como_ Plan as R-2 (Mixed Residential) with a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. The Co prehen- sive guide has always acknowledged that the actual zoning will supersede the pro- posed uses on the land use plan. Therefore, the proposed development is in con- formance with the zoning on this particular parcel. As mentioned above, the zoning on the parcel is R-4 (Residential Multiple) and could allow between 12 and 22 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is propo- sing to construct 28 24 -unit buildings for a total of 672 dwelling units. The proposed site has a gross density of 7.9 dwelling units per acre and a net den- sity of 9.17 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the development proposal is in line with the zoning of this site. The applicant is proposing to extend Duckwood Drive to the east of the property to provide access to the east when and if Carriage Hills C,olf Course is ever converted to a different use. Ducl:wood Drive is also proposed to be the resi- dential collector within Section 14. The applicant is also proposing a looped street on the north side of Duckwood Drive and a looped street on the south side of Ducici%rood Drive which provides a good circulation for the overall developmient. On the southerly looped street, there is also proposed one cul-de-sac which would provide access to 3 conday.nium buildings, or 72 dwelling units. The applicant is proposing to plat each of the 28 condominiun buildings into a lot which could stand separately on its own in accordance with setbacks, square 46 CITY OF EAG,AN LEXINGTON PLACE FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE Tf+10 footage, and public access. However, the layout of the proposed project, even though all lots do have public access, there has been common access to the pro- ject to service up to 3 condominium buildings, or 72 dwelling units. These ccnt- mon accesses reduce the curb cuts on the public street and provides a better de- sign by offsetting the buildings and allowing open space between groupings of complexes. The different angles tend to break up the development more so than having all the buildings at right angles, or parallel to each other, around the streets. The eor!non access also provides a good circulation within the devel- opment proposal. The proposed buildings will be 3 stories and contain 24 dwelling units. The ap- plicant is proposing the mix to be 6 studio units, 7 one -bedroom units and 11 two-bedroom units for a total of 24 units per building. At each end of the com- plex, there will be a 12 -car garage which will provide the 24 covered parking spaces per unit. The applicant has proposed .8 open parking spaces for the over- all developnent. Presently, the ordinance requires 1.5 open spaces per dwelling unit. However, in the study which had been conducted, staff has found that one covered space and one open space per unit has been found adequate for this type of dwelling unit, especially when the development consists of 13 units of the 24 are of one bedroom or less. Enclosed is a typical fact sheet put together by the developer which lists the types of units and the amenities which are provided with each condominium building. The 28 buildings cover 13.68% of the net acreage according to the present de- sign. The applicant has proposed two models of buildings ranging from the main building being 106' x 51' and up to 160' by 51' according to the mix provided for each building. If calculating all buildings to be 160' x 51' and two 12 - car garages, the lot coverage would only ane to 14.48 of the net area. Both are less than the 20% lot coverage requirement. The proposed plat is scheduled to be reviewed by the Advisory Park Committee Thursday, March 4, 1982 for their review and comment. However, staff is indi- cating that the last time the proposed plat was before the Advisory Planning Commission, there was a cash contribution per unit recommended and the potential for a trail connection to the proposed park in this general neighborhood. This proposed trail connection would thus be served from the cul-de-sac street to the south. Also, it is the staff's understandinc that the Park reeommsmdation would be a trail along Lexington Avenue and either a sidewalk or trail along Duckwood Drive for this proposal. However, formal action by the Park Committee will be March 4, 1982. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) Cross easements and parking easements shall be granted on the lots which are served by common access for more than one dwelling unit. 2) The outside parking spaces shall be of 10 x 20 dimension and the parking area shall be surfaced with concrete curbing around the perimeter of the parking area. 47 CITY CF EAGAN IMaNGICN PLACE FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE THREE 3) Haneamier Association by-laws shall be submitted and reviewed for the de- velcpment prior to the final plat of the first stage. 4) Detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted and approved by the City and a landscape bond shall be required for an adequate amount and not released until one year after the landscaping has been ompleted. 5) The preliminary plat shall be reviewed by the Eagan Park C.a[mittee and sub- ject to the Park Camtittee's rec wendations. 6) The applicant is proposing .8.open parking spaces per unit. A variance would have to be granted from the strict requirement of 1.5 open spaces per dwelling unit. Staff is reccmTnnding that one open parking space and one garage space be required for each dwelling unit. The Advisory Planning CaMlission may want to recamend to the City Council that amending the 2.5 parking spaces per ordinance requirement be reduced to 1 owrered space and one parking space per unit. 7) The preliminary plat shill be reviewed by Dakota County's Plat Catmissicn and subject to their reoamiendations. 8) All other ordinance requirements shall be net. DCR/ja(:n 9) Temporary service for sanitary sewer will be allowed through the Tanark Addi- tion for this proposed development under the condition that the internal san- itary sewer system shall provide flexibility in allowing approximately 60% of this development to be redirected in the future through the Windcrest trunk system to the south. 10) A storm sewer system connecting the proposed northerly pond (DP -18) with the pond in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue (DP -5) must be constructed as a condition of final plat approval. 11) A positive gravity storm sewer outlet to service the property south of Duck - wood Drive must be constructed to Hurley lake in addition to developing the internal ponding area referenced as JP -45. 12) The construction of a 44', 9 -ton collector street for the extension of Duck - wood Drive to the east plat line shall be the responsibility of this devel- opment. 13) A 55' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Lexington Avenue. An 80' right-of-way shall be dedicated for Duckwood Drive. 14) All related trunk area assessments and lateral benefit from existing trunk utilities must be paid or levied at the time of final plat approval, if not listed as a pending assessment under an approved project by the City of Eagan. CM OF EAGAN T NGrM PLACE FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE FOUR 15) Sufficient drainage/ponding easements shall be dedicated of sufficient size to incorporate the required storage capacities as follows: (DP -18 - 11.2 acre feet for a controlled elevation of 876.0) (JP -45 - 7.8 acre feet with a controlled elevation of 890.3) 16) This development shall provide for a future storm sewer outlet fen Pond JP - 46 within the Carriage Hills Golf Course. 17) A 10' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public right-of-way and adjacent to private property. TAC/jack M, 0 0 To: THE PLANNING CCMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RU UZ, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 1982 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - LEXIWION PLACE (U. S. HOMES CORP.) The Public Works Department has the following information for considera- tion of approval of the above -referenced plat: UTILITIES Water service availability will be provided by a southerly extension of the water main from the proposed Tomark 2nd Addition or frau the existing 18" trunk water main located on the west side of Lexington Avenue extend- ing north fran.Duckwood Drive. This 18" trunk water main will have to be extended south to the limits of this proposed plat to provide for the pro- per looping of the internal water main necessitated by this development. A 16" trunk water main will have to be extended along Duckwood Drive from Lexington Avenue to the east portion of this plat as a part of this de- velopment. In accordance with the recently updated Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, the entire area for the proposed Lexington Place Subdivision is proposed to obtain the sanitary sewer service through the installation of a lift station within the Windcrest Addition and an extension of a trunk sani- tary sewer system frau this lift station to Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. Laterals from this future trunk system are, then intended to be constructed northerly along Lexington Avenue to ultimately provide ser- vice for this proposed development. However, at this time, this lift station and trunk sanitary sewer extension have not been constructed nor is it in the planning process for the very near future. After detailed review of the elevations associated with this proposed development, it has been determined that all of the proposed units of this proposed plat can obtain temporary gravity sewer service to the north through the Ttmark Addition into the existing 12" trunk sanitary sewer located along Yankee Doodle Road. However, when saturation development occurs in the industrial park, there is limited excess capacity available for this pro- posed development. Therefore, a preliminary engineering study has been performed which indicates that all 672 proposed units could be serviced with gravity sewer through the Tomark Addition towards Yankee Doodle Road on a temporary basis until the Windcrest lift station and trunk sanitary sewer extension occurred sometime in the future. At that time, through specific detailed design of the sanitary sewer system, approximately 432 units would have their flow redirected to the south into the Windcrest lift station in accordance with the 1982 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. The remaining 240 units at the north end would permanently drain toward the north into the existing sewer on Yankee Doodle Road. We feel that this line could handle this small addition without any 'future re- striction on capacity as the industrial,area grows. However, in order to provide this flexibility, an estimated $35,000 ($50.00 per unit) would be required to install an auxiliary sanitary sewer line southerly along Lexington Avenue for this future connection. SV 0 Thomas A. Colbert February 25, 1982 Lexington Place Page two 0 Topography for the proposed development is generally rolling with a natural divide through the middle of the plat (Duckwood Drive extended). The drainage to the north lies within the LeMay Lake drainage basin with surface water runoff being conveyed to that Lake through a series of intermediate ponds and two future lift stations to be located north of Yankee Doodle Road and west of Lexington Avenue. Internal storm water will have to be directed to an onsite pond located in the northeast cor- ner of this proposed plat (DP -18) which will also provide for the over flow from O'Leary lake which is presently being constructed under Project 322, Contract 81-12. With the development of this proposed plat, an out- let frim the pond within Lexington Place will have to be coordinated and constructed with the internal storm sewer for the Tanark 2nd Addition which will provide for this drainage to the pond within Outlot D of To - nark 2nd Addition at the corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Ave- nue (DP -10). This pond within the Tanark ADdition will have to have its outlet constructed to the pond (DP -5) located in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue. If these three ponds are con- nected by gravity storm sewer, there is sufficient capacity to handle the proposed Lexington Place development as well as the proposed Tomark 2nd Addition. Pond DP -5 in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue will act as a "third tier" drainage basin providing for ponding for storm water only when the ponds within the Lexington Place and Tcmark Addition have reached capacity. Therefore, no outlet from DP -5 is anti- cipated in the near future nor is any extensive ponding easement acquisi- tion required at this time. Drainage for the southern portion of the proposed Lexington Place is di- rected into the Fish lake drainage basin through a ponding easement for Hurley Lake which is presently being acquired through condamiation fran the McCarthy property west of Lexington Avenue. In addition to the in- ternal storm sewer required for the southern half of this proposed de- velopnent, a storm sewer will have to be installed along Lexington Ave- nue and then west along Wescott Road to Hurley Lake. Hurley Lake pre- sently does not have a positive storm sewer outlet, but with the pond- ing easement presently being acquired and its existing capacity, the lift station outlet is not anticipated to be required for 3-4 years. The continuation of Duckwood Drive as a collector street from Lexington Avenue to the east edge of the plat should be continued as a 44' wide, 9 -ton street with a concrete sidewalk on the north side to the east edge of this plat similar to the existing Duckwood Drive. Because this plat requires the construction of a collector road prior to the City's time schedule for this road's construction, the developer should bear all costs associated with constructing this street to a collector status with sidewalks. si 0 • Thomas A. Colbert February 25, 1982 Lexington Place Page three Internal looped public streets as proposed provide adequate access to all proposed lots. The proposed cul-de-sac in the southeast corner is of ac- ceptable length and does not require a variance and is necessitated due to the configuration of the property and the topography involved. All other access to the units will be by private drives and/or parking lots. The overall proposed street layout provides good accessibility to Lexing- ton Avenue for this development. EASEMUM AND RIGHTS -OF -MY A 55' half right-of-way for Lexington Avenue will be required. Duckwood Drive should consist of an 80' right-of-way with the other internal streets being the standard 60' requirement. rem'nt. Internal easements will be required to provide for proper looping of the water main and sanitary sewer exten- sions as final details are determined. Pond DP -18 in the northern end of this plat should provide for a ponding easement incorporating 11.2 acre feet above the proposed controlled water elevation of 876.0. The outlet from this pond to the north into Ttoark will require the acquisi- tion of an easement across a 16.51 "cartway" strip of land under the ow- nership of the Carriage Hills Golf Course. Pond JP -45 and JP -42 in the southern portico of this plat shall provide for 7.8 acre feet and 2.3 acre feet of storage capacity respectively along with a corresponding ponding easement based on controlled outlet elevations of 890.3 and 887.1 respectively. All other standard easements will be rea_uired at the time of final plat approval. SITE PLAN The Engineering Department has no concerns pertaining to the proposed lay- out of the site plan as adequate access to public rights-of-way are pro- vided by way of private drives and/or parking lots. TRAILS/SME%VffM A 5' concrete sidewalk should be installed along the north side of Duck - wood Drive as a part of this development. An 8' bituminous trailway should be constructed along the east side of Lexington Avenue within a 10' easement adjacent to the west line of this proposed plat. in addi- tion, a walkway connection to the southeast corner of this plat should be provided as indicated by the Advisory Park and Recreation Committee. Think sanitary sewer and water area assessments have been levied under Project 58 to the property located on the north side only of the proposed extension of Duckwood Drive. This parcel (010-29) will be responsible for assuming the lateral benefit from trunk water main that presently exists along Lexington Avenue north of Duckwood Drive. Trunk area storm sewer assessments should be collected as a condition of final plat ap- proval for the north half of this proposed development. S 0 • 'Ihomas A. Colbert February 25, 1982 Lexington Place Page four For the land located within this proposed plat south of Duckwood Drive, trunk area sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer will have to be col- lected as a condition of final plat approval. In addition, all costs associated with the installation of internal utilities and/or the lat- eral benefit associated with the extension of the required trunk water main along Duckwood Drive and Lexington Avenue will be assessed against this property based on benefit received. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect pertaining to this report at the Planning Coimiission Meeting of February 25, 1982. Respectfully submitted, C;�' , Mamas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jack 53 �_ - � . .•\�tiH 1 HaP-4 -89 •e .:i._J!' rn-'•EE-� ` `..' \ rce ^OP_I6 •i.�i+b gyp, �\�• e9J.0./.iC.� � �- Ji :•� l il REfr ,E •v Fools EAGANOA1'T� '• •L I1fILC\L_.�±__ pP' / E / II D-4 PILi i oo is rv�-PANR-NQ 2-. _ SU 13Y 2EHNOE71 % ___...` �_•e /_!•- 'L-Sr3_I / / n' I<. a r.- _B 810 \ -LONE OAXK ROAp t -�•�`,•�� % D'c`0c- f ' ` D -V DP•13 I __.' B70.J l l' • ^ cHoot ../ �A ,•tl`• N?i(.'�-�e :'rY B76Del: iEAD 0-2 /. / ev' p,•�`.�`O _.'1 .r,. I, z A xORYeeEjlTiR--1'-_"}+,' I \ ` / E -n �•Pbie.o_ L_OP-2Dm Ix•._ -EA 0`4 I I V �BB03 871.0, / 6 / \ [rB>•7. o. NAY'&' 1 ! /• -lNDD TAI SARA N0. 3 �. / B- x.• a-� F[�^T .._. "i�l '�' .�;Ti'�I -.- seM / ,R' �L}� DP14 �J i r 0 SERoiP-3 EP -7 - \r`/I// e _ '/ VDP-19 860-0 �,� P B161T P / s Syo:875.0' 8309 884.0 8700 I v� L5.•4 1 890.0 CP'4+ \� "�(,•�/tet i \ B4El0u CR6 ADWTI°r �/` DP -6 •0g� 1p3 gDP-II i SAce= b v.9 / Cp-71.7. ' /( IDn $69.0" 3�;.8 8620 I I I ICE 1; • / C� 8400 e i ra i/,./ LS. -6 �v . •�RIRLIP _. / DP r5 N -48• E-8 / FOA 8300/ I •�• ? 842.0 E•• // is RIDGE I /� 11DP-4 �� 85 0 B B0 LA -7 •_--+fix % CP -1 -_ I' - / BIjR 1^ J�D �Jc /28 EI -a - •'/ rhvE.I .__,! ROxO pyn 0. Rp - E� J� •, ,�jx7_ •0 -LJ-' �� il�^�E 1 .a:i SURREY Ih�C"uExl]ECA P z I �r CP -2 x••/.:C-9 •TH Aoo 7tl DPg•IO L•/ 'wEscoTT JiHlu �r 8zoo 1 HEIGHTS $ O.� . P is .CP -1 WE5007 -�: 1, / 8x2. 'zNO 1`- / �� OJ EP _ 658.3 I BIBS--r-T� „ 1 BB,A I �_ 7 p • P=6 �." ��gp Ix' GARDENE n I LOT tt��8��803:: DP -7 P-7 71 O •�• ..,.770.G09.0B,80-0.Owl ..... B J. 0E { - e►�/.II 795-0 643.7; % PIC) Nbel Y45 �7i JP=13 �•, i JP -46.2 //TV J s-_- .']872.0 903 0 $910-3 �la'--•I f /?• qy N' �i�B392 v �'( •fP 4T 1, 'v -42 c~ 1� BB70 I "A .O��n�eeQPo��,QA /1.�/ q�,(, y Bu.O f153'� I, ra _es\�.� 7.0-� �jp_aD• �• CITY .Ir ,� koaE.eY • .4+- JP -32 J JP4i 7 p I,JP-4.'LA!(.' • '"\8390 ,� MIfO ti 639.0-- 411 `I:� J 15.7 JP -31 1^ 4 k /7/\. 615.7 JP -44 / -7y _ _ i 6770 BP1- /(j�/) BP -26'`/j A a c ❑ = BJOQ U60 Poe.. BO.O In 7 t3 i / Y '`� L7 �s�.._ - t -4e J z II eLACNHAWH /�4/((� '`'`t• �� "I ` ANN d�` JP -19 1 P / , \� 3- } i 8702 / i w/BP-2 % 625.0e} .0 Jp_3p 874.0 / 792-0 !/ 828.0 JP -10 872.7 / \ / } I794.0 •, 820.6 } BB1.0 I : "�,_ q Ji�IY`p BP -2B 090 L5.-12 cx 1 -e -I. 832,0 808.8 / 866Z i __ W' 8330 Cq7 B/'In 6_P 8660 ♦ JP -9 --J r' xs•:T' j. A JP -36- 8706 1JP=35 8200 - v L711 869-0 _J J -JA JP -34 / .xit B1Y,4 AIg. 6 -I-i2 8640 J-• 3L� / 8613 a-erg8900 J -r E POALE i/ 1 8950 I� P-27 :jam Iz/JP-317 JP -48 fie. li 7/� PATRICIf �•� i' i ��9 �J, BB6 139 Jnr, N II / % •'J 812 814. A ,� / iI i 875. 8758cY• li. 17�BO.S: Jp.g • t wl /l/A I 'l 9240 'ul BP -4 J �\ -- Ii:I rR/n"a 8200+N Pe /_29 li •I / / B9J0.0 iAll 870.0 _T `,�! % 1. IB BSao \//�� LP63 1?j),'.t'�l1 920,] 1' N 9100 k- c e A N '!,� rz• R e�41 BSBO _y� _��` I�l f1'I YI-1 �J-I ['! TyI•T'T-`-:-.-,.-.u,-_.-l_-� J-•• _._ w I-•• I'l s' e°/ o` 1- .$85.6 1884503 6 B -23 j I \ I /�BPi 1 I�: f -LP -42:: �'�J'i"ipJ.�%F, $r�i SF,i'�� P 9 BP -18 I ( /B860 II s]5o 80x. 7 « 7'•BB30�' I I }} $I2A / r� 4 _ • r2 1 .r•. �� . 11..•`��'�� yy 4 S` . ,: B e .) JJ(( I Al L Il n Y.LV��`L/A: nR i.rY 4^. r' 2AE'•I Ky t 901.0 I 'BP•16 1 �`r•JI1LJf y gyp.'.' .69.. 9/i B99gqpp �j/��,7 A•. I F _F .. _..: •Il AN]itJ 'D D' i2' •3'uja_ r•91TI.0-E•G _ ^i" I J FK'. ._ �^�p•� :�u+�' I:n "i LP -40 _- �� u0 L �jy�� • �� L- - S�b l�P-411J98.0-arP-SD `LP -61 R s Iii/tl/�'e I , I _ .-_ BP•IS p l �� J L.ap.JH L3 -x8 BUBO 90JA - �- i $9i� BB ° �, - ::�•lr;,i:;rlcr; � �e-7 $$$�..�dlSL : =. �+„S1J/�p •. •; -- -:_ :-_ . :��.., tea. LN• \ LP -54 •o n ... ,..P 13 �-- _ 8 I:o.l1 '"1 yl 6o9G _J LP -46 0 LEXINGTON PLACE 24 Unit Condominium 0 Models Units Gross Sq. Ft. Net Sq. Ft. 24S 6 502 472 24-1 7 709 673 24-2 11 916 874 Features Enclosed secure interior parking Automatic garage doors Appliances - range, oven, dishwasher, disposal, washer and dryer Energy circulating fireplace with glass doors Zoned radiant heat 2 baths in all 2 bedroom models Security system entrance Private lounge Individual lockers Inside bike storage Air conditioner Inside trash storage Low maintenance - exterior - same materials as used in single family - aluminum, wood, brick s� FIRPERty. IMSEABC1 -4 01 Pr,-1iMh7a1-Y P101 OF. LEXINGTON PLACE 7 lb --- FOR: 6 U.S HOME CORPORATION 3 IL 0 .-A 7 N A 41 7 /Z ...... izi ... " T I W,i�yl . (01®r. NZ WRG ARIM L LEY O A SSOCATES, INC A T R. 1• 6 7 A 4 DEVELOPMENT PLAN W: LEXINGTON PLACE Ip : U.S. HOME CORPORATION CIL WINDEN a ASSOCIATES, INC ;.IENDUTA J S — _— —l.a;...F.. J t id raa COMMERCIAL •r ^'"^' I ' �y/- —' PLANNED DEVELOPMENT RI :~/'. -; .`•p . RJ + / Ind /Ind. . a �� •>'� R) �; P , "'r� � � I :"'-h` I Intl \ Ind yy, CSC- -Ind. a .. • ' Q �-rr- R- -_ y 1�; R•�'.,, , - Ind29. raR� ' R41 >t�RI ¢ � E _R-0 17 P r R Jy NiA �}' �' .z I �sL Ral R-1 II _ C. R -1 i R!0 I .` 1 O � �"'^e•rdc ait-•, - �_ iI :, I RI "�C�, 2, �:, .'4 � p '. I 4I .,, R'A.0 r`•' �Nl}? I P P. R r ; w R -II R -II R -II M D l �i ,f J� R -III �= . LB ::I pp = I _I'. i' ] R -III RB (� CSC/GB/ R -III R-IIY R-I,� Rlr-�a,�' r _ �. ��la�� _ R -III . R-11 .. P R -II '.�`,' ��':I Z- - .,:,j::.�_p:vli •_� ® R -II 'r.....,� R -II'; ;w R -II R it i ..v.e , ,,,�%' ,TJl7 ,R I `':•/` . ti .I 1). R.I wJ t_ lJ F 3 FSI ^� :� CSC ;'� & k \ r(. 1• Si 7' • j p R-1 Q` IF x LB R -I R -II P'. R_II� (iR-II- R-1-.:. RII p` I ,I'' R -II yen _; t (� y r )� `<f t- s'Je e( VALLE ��ROSEMOUNT. / //I !� C] AAUGE, S=U, EIDE & 11mixR, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 9506 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA 55122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER Thomas Hedges City Administrator Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 March 9, 1982 RE: Efficiency Condominiums/Lexington Place Dear Tom: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 454.4224 i Recently we were asked to examine the legal aspects of restricting or allowing the construction of "efficiency" condominiums under 400 square feet. It appears that such a structure does not violate density requirements or any other part of Ordinance 52. It would appear that if this were an apartment building, units of this size would be allowable. Apartments and condominiums do fall under the same classification by ordinance. Thus it would be difficult to argue that a rental unit of 400 square feet should be allowed while an owned unit of the same size should not. That is not to say that such an argument is not possible. It is also worth noting Minnesota Statute Section 515A.1-106 which provides that "a zoning, subdivision, building code, or . . . ordinance . may not directly or indirectly . . . impose any requirement upon a condominium,/ . . , which it would not impose upon a physically similar development under a different form of ownership." Municipalities are allowed to regulate floor areas. McQuillin §25.142. However, such a zoning ordinance is subject to the unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious test. In other words, such a restriction must promote the public health, safety and welfare. 24 N.W. 2d 209. Esthetics may be an incident but cannot be the moving factor. The restriction cannot be based solely on the desire to preserve property values in the area. In conclusion, it appears that "efficiency" condominiums must be allowed under the present ordinance where zoning and density conditions are met. A change in the ordinance or denial of the plat would have to be based on adequate reason promoting the public health, safety or welfare. DGK:ras 66 Very�t-?ly yours, David` G. Keller APC Minutes February 25, 1982 r LEXINGTON PLACE - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of U. S. Homes Corporation and Orrin Thompson for preliminary plat approval for Lexington Place consis- ting of 84.62 acres and containing 28 condominium buildings for a total of 672 dwelling units was presented to the Planning Commission. The property is currently zoned R-4 located west of Lexington at the extension of Duckwood Drive. The density could range between 12 and 22 dwelling units per acre and the land use indicates north of Duckwood is R-3 (Mixed Residential) at a density of 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre. South of Duckwood is R-2 with a density of 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre. The gross density would be 7.9 dwelling units per acre and net density would be 9.17 per acre. He has Proposed to plat each of the 28 condominium buildings into a separate lot that would conform with the ordinance requirements. Each building would be 3 stories and contain 24 units each but with a mix of 6 studio units, 7 one - bedroom units and 11 two-bedroom units for a total of 24 units per building on a general basis. There would be 12 car garages at either end of each building and a request was made to reduce the parking from 2.5 to 2.0 spaces per unit. An earlier application had been submitted in 1981 for development on the same property and Orrin Thompson Homes had not pursued the proposal at that time. Bob Hoffman, Orrin Thompson, Bob Carlson and Chuck Winden appeared for the applicant. Studios would be priced under $40,000.00 and larger units at a higher price range. All would be for -sale units and would be approved for FHA financing. Tot lots would be included and two outdoor swimming pools. No tennis courts would be included in the proposal. An explanation of the ex- terior decor, landscaping, berming, etc. took place by representatives of the applicant and it was suggested by a number of neighbors present that Lexington should be upgraded in order to alleviate the heavy traffic problems even at the present time. Other neighboring property owners objected to being assessed for storm sewer improvements and Mr. Colbert stated the area bene- fited would most likely be assessed for storm sewer improvements. Mr. Carlson stated that child density would be about 0.18 children per unit. School children bus traffic was a concern of neighboring owners and compliance with the character of the other single-family residences in the area. It was suggested that a review of the storm sewer issue take place by the staff before council review. Mr. Thompson indicated that they expected to commence construction north of Deerwood Drive initially, and that all construction would be completed in 3 to 4 years. The grading plans are not complete but the berms and plantings are planned extensively on the project. There were concerns about resale to speculators and it was noted that there could be no control over such resale after the initial purchase by an owner -occupant. It was also noted that the number of units may change as sales occur, depending on the demand for specific types of units. The hearing commenced at 8:10- p.m. and at 9:25 p.m., Krob moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Cross easements and parking easements shall be granted on the lots which are served by common access for more than one dwelling unit and shall be reviewed by the City staff prior to recording. 61 APC Minutes February 25, 1982 2. The outside parking spaces shall be of 10 x 20 dimension and the parking areas shall be surfaced with concrete curbing around the perimeter of the parking areas. 3. Homeowner Association Articles and By -Laws for the development shall be submitted and reviewed prior to the final plat of the first stage. 4. Detailed landscaping plans shall be submitted and approved by the City and a landscape bond shall be required for an adequate amount and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 5. The preliminary plat shall be reviewed by the Eagan Park Committee and be subject to the Park Committee's recommendations. 6. The 2.5 parking spaces per ordinance requirement shall be reduced to one covered space and one parking, space per unit. 7. The preliminary plat shall be reviewed by Dakota County's Plat Commission and subject to their recommendations. 8. All other ordinance requirements shall be met. 9. Temporary service forsanitary sewer will be allowed through the Tomark Addition for this proposed development under the condition that the internal sanitary sewer system shall provide flexibility in allowing approxi- mately 60% of this development to be redirected in the future through the Windcrest trunk system to the south. 10. A storm sewer system connecting the proposed northerly pond (DP -18) with the pond in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue (DP -5) must be constructed as a condition of final plat approval. 11. A positive gravity storm sewer outlet to service the property south of Duckwood Drive must be constructed to Hurley Lake in addition to developing the internal ponding area referenced as JP -45- 12. The construction of a 44 foot, 9 ton collector street for the extension of Duckwood Drive to the east plat line shall be the responsibility of this development. 13. A 60 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Lexington Avenue. An 80 foot right-of-way shall be dedicated for Duckwood Drive. 14. All related trunk area assessments and lateral benefits from exist- ing trunk utilities shall be paid or levied at the time of final plat approval, if not listed as a pending assessment under an approved project by the City of Eagan. 49- APC Minutes February 25, 1982 15. Drainage/ponding easements approved by the City shall be dedicated of sufficient size to incorporate the required storage capacities as follows: (DP -18 - 11.2 acre feet for a controlled elevation of 876.0) (JP -45 - 7.8 acre feet with a controlled elevation of 890.3) 16. This development shall provide for a future storm sewer outlet from Pond JP -46 within the Carriage Hills Golf Course. 17. Ten foot drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated adjacent to all public rights-of-way and adjacent to private property. 18. A 5 foot concrete sidewalk should be installed along the north side of Duckwood Drive as a part of this development. An 8 foot bituminous trail - way should be constructed along the east side of Lexington Avenue within a 10 foot easement adjacent to the west line of this proposed plat. In addition, a walkway connection to the southeast corner of this plat should be provided as indicated by the Advisory Park and Recreation Committee. Those in favor were Hall, Srob, Mulrooney and Turnham. Wilkins and McCrea voted no. Member Wilkins stated that she felt that the City should not be a testing ground for up to 168 efficiency units in the 28 buildings. There were strong concerns regarding the inclusion of the studio units in the com- plex. 63 • . March 10, 1982 "MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION - PARKS DEDICATION - LEXINGTON PLACE On Thursday, March 4, 1982 the Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee made the following recommendation to the City Council regarding the parks dedication requirements for Lexington Place. That a cash dedi- cation, based on the number of units and existing cash fee at time of final platting, be made. And, that the developer provide tot -lot and swimming pools, as depicted on the preliminary plat; that the developer provide an asphalt trail along Lexington and a sidewalk along Duckwood. Further, that the developer provide an easement for a future trail on the cul-de-sac in the south portion of tFe development eastward to the eastern limits of the plat. This easement will provide for a potential future link with a park to be located further to the south and east of this plat. cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner Paul Hauge, City Attorney Judy Chaffee, Planning Secretary 6j 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Sixteen PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TOMARK SECOND ADDITION D. Tomark Development Company for a Preliminary Plat (Tomark 2nd Addition) Consisting of Approximately 25.3 Acres -- An application has been submitted to the City for preliminary plat approval of Tomark 2nd Addition consisting of approximately 25.3 acres located on Outlot A, Tomark First Addition. The applicant is requesting approval of the first building which is located on approximately 5 acres and contains 78 dwelling units. The public hearing was held before the APC at the February 25, 1982 regular meeting and the APC is recommending approval of the motions to the City Council. The first motion is to approve Tomark 2nd Addition subject to the conditions in the staff report with the understanding that two parking spaces per unit would be the parking requirement and that a fire access be provided on the south side of the building in order to be able to get access on the east side of the condominium building. The second motion the APC made was to approve the reduc- tion of the 2.5 parking spaces to 2 parking spaces on the .second building in the first addition with the understanding that addi- tional landscaping will be provided around the parking area. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Assis- tant's report, a copy of which is enclosed on pagesC�, through 7 for your review. For action that was taken by M APG, refer to minutes found on pages 7y through 50.1 Enclosed on page �j is the recommendation of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Uommittee concerning this proposed development. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the two aforementioned actions as recommended for approval by the APC, considering preliminary plat approval and a variance requiring additional landscaping around the parking area. 6 5- CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - TCMARK 2ND ADDITICN APPLICANT: TOMARK e�u�•: u LOCATION: NFA, OF THE NW, OF SECTICN 14 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 11, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVE OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for preliminary plat approval, Tomark 2nd Addition, which consists of approximately 25.3 acres located on Outlot A, Tomark 1st Addition. The applicant is only requesting approval of the first building which is located on approximately 5 acres and contains 78 dwelling units. Cn April 21, 1981, the City Council approved the preliminary plat of Tomark Addi- tion. At this time, the applicant was looking only for approval of the first phase which consisted of approximately 10.6 acres and contained 144 dwelling units. The remaining land was platted as an outlot. Since the April 21 City Council meeting, construction has begin on the two buildings which will each have 72 dwelling units. The application before the Planning Commission is for prelimi- nary plat approval of the first building in the Tomark 2nd Addition which origi- nally was part of Outlot A in the Tomark 1st Addition. SITE PIAN AND PLAT REVIEW due Tomark 2nd Addition preliminary plat consists of one building and three out- lets. The building contains 78 dwelling units and it would be on a 5 -acre par- cel. Outlot A consists of 5.4 acres, Outlot B, 4.2 acres and Outlot D, 9.2 acres. These three outlots will each have one building on it for a total of 222 dwelling units once the developers omplete the entire Tonark development. Until the de- velopers want to begin these phases of the developtrent, the three outlots will re- main as such. The proposed structure would be a 3 -story building and would contain 78 dwelling units. The building would be broken down into 6 three-bedroom units, 51 two-bed- room units and 21 one-bedroan units. The parking requirement for the building would be 195 parking spaces, of which 78 would have to be covered parking, either garage or underground. The applicant is proposing underground parking for the building. The site plan shows 68 open parking spaces and 88 covered parking spaces for a total of 156 parking spaces. The site plan is 39 parking spaces short of the 2.5 parking spaces per unit recuirernnt. (0 6 CITY OF EAGAN PREISIEVARY PLAT - TCMARK 2ND ADDITION FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE TWO Again, staff would like to point out that in conversations with other communi- ties, 2.5 parking spaces per unit seems to be in excess of the parking needs for rondominium units, and most communities have 2 parking spaces per unit as a standard requirement. In reviewing the lot coverage of the building, the applicant is proposing to cover approximately 29,185 square feet for a total of 13.48 lot coverage which is under the 208 lot coverage requirement. According to Ordinance 52, the lot size requirement for the proposed building is 5 acres. The applicant is meet- ing this requirement. In reviewing the site plan, the applicant has net all setback requirements for the building. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed landscape plan be provided for Iot 1, Block 1, Tomark 2nd Addition and an adequate landscape bond shall be provided and not re- leased until one year after the landscaping has been ocrrpleted. 2. The applicant is proposing 156 parking spaces which is 2 parking spaces per unit. A variance would have to be granted from the requirement of 2.5 parking spaces per unit. 3. The park dedication requirement shall be determined by the Park Committee. 4. All other applicable ordinance requirements shall be met. DMO/jach ENGINEERING RECCMMEN=ONS 5. Sanitary sewer and water main shall be extended to the south limits of this proposed plat for continuation and looping through the proposed development to the south. 6. A storm sewer system shall be constructed providing for the connection of the drainage basin in the southeast corner of Outlot A (DP -9) to the drainage basin in the northwest corner of Outlot D (DP -10). 7. The ponding easement for DP -9 as dedicated under the 1st Addition will have to be revised to conform with the approved grading plan for the proposed 2nd Addition to incorporate the 864.0 elevation. 8. Adequate easements to allow construction of sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer facilities to service the proposed lex ngton Place develop- ment to the south must be dedicated as a part of this final plat. 9. A Mailed grading and drainage plan must be reviewed and approved prior to final plat approval. 10. Trunk area storm sewer assessments must be assumed for Lot 1, Block 1 of the proposed 2nd Addition as a condition of final plat aporoval. G-7 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN PRE=NARY PLAT - TOIpm 2ND ADDITION . FEBR[IARY 25, 1982 PAGE THREE ADDITIONAL ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION CONCERNING TOMARK 1ST ADDITION The developers would like the Planning Camassion to consider another item concerning the second building of the Tomark 1st Addition. At the present time, the developers are proposing 2.5 parking spaces per unit for the build- ing. However, the developers are seeking a variance from the 2.5 parking spaces per unit requirement, and they would like to construct 2 parking spaces per unit. The developers would have additional landscaping and green area in- stead of the additional parking spaces. Staff would like to point out again that the 2.5 parking spaces per unit requirement seems to be in excess of the needed parking for condominiums. Attached axe exhibits illustrating the build- ing with 2.5 parking spaces per unit and 2 parking spaces per unit. 0 0 TO: THE PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 1982 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - TOMARK 2ND ADDITION (TOMARK DEVELOPMENT) The Public Works Department has the following comments for consideration of the above -referenced proposed plat: UTI=ES Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size and capacity to service this proposed development have been installed within Golfview Drive under Project 336, Contract 81-9 to the north line of the proposed 2nd Addition. These util- ities will have to be extended southerly to service this proposed building in Lot 1, Block 1 in addition to continuing to the south limits of Outlot A to provide for continuation and looping through the proposed Lexington Place adjacent to the south. Access to this proposed facility will be provided by way of Golfview Drive which was constructed wider Project 336B, Contract 81-10. It will require an extension of Golfview Drive along the entire frontage of Lot 1, Block 1 with future extension and ultimate connection to Lexington Avenue taking place within any subsequent development beyond the proposed 2nd Addition. It is felt that Golfview Drive intersection with Yankee Doodle Road will be adequate to handle Tomark 1st and this proposed building. The maximin length for access into this proposed building will be 6501. n••� a �••�r•a Topography is generally rolling topography with the drainage from this pro - Posed plat being directed toward the southeast corner into drainage basin DP -9 contained within the adjacent Carriage Hills Golf Course property. The outlet from Pond DP -9 is ultimately proposed to be directed to the pond near the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue within proposed Outlot D of Tomark 2nd Addition. This storm sewer outlet fran the southeast corner of this proposed development toward Yankee Doodle Road must be con- structed in conjunction with the proposed outlet from Pond DP -18 immediately to the south within the proposed Lexington Place development. This storm sewer extension must be constructed as a part of the Tc ark 2nd Addition. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY A ponding easement will have to be rededicated incorporating the 864.0 ele- vation for Pond DP -9 based on the final approved grading plan for the 2nd Addition. A standard 10' drainage and utility easement must be dedicated adjacent to all public rights-of-way and adjacent private property and cen- tered over all over common lot lines. A 60' right-of-way shall be dedica- ted to provide for the continuation of Golfview Drive adjacent to Int 1, Block 1 of the 2nd Addition. In addition, adequate utility easements will be required to allow for the installaticn of a storm sewer system connecting M Thomas A. Colbert February 25, 1982 Tomark 2nd Addition Page two Pond DP -9 and DP -10 and also providing for the continuation of sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer from DP -18 for the proposed Lexington Place Subdivision to the south. The necessary right-of-way for Lexington Ave- nue was dedicated as a part of the 1st Addition. ASSESSMENTS Trunk area sanitary sewer and water assessments Have been levied under Project 58 previously. However, trunk area storm sewer assessment must be levied as a condition of final plat approval or as a part of the future required storm sewer construction discussed previously. TRAILMY AMID SIDENALRS No additional sidewalk or trailways are required as a condition of this proposed development. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect of this metro pertaining to this proposed development at the Planning Commission Meeting of February 25, 1982. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TPG/jach '70 - -A,;.�;'a ��•" -.: r Vii,;. --,I _ novae o `,I - °'I -.. �[REFr .E EAGAN°j(fTER- / � Z'FfiLC:•.l_._ -�;.� /' � ID.k ..1.._' ;.'/ I= r I--\--` • ; 1D'A PILEY SENNDER'Jf I (�' I I• r? ! _•;,' p. , -. E•r -LONE OAX ROAD" -I Tr -868.0'- -i• 0 J 6E.,a-TT-F: r `l' I °•e rnooL I - I ^9 4.0.1; . 070.3 �"� "j-�,, •. /' � •p?� N � Ix' 876-0 FE� e t I .' I �•AE: ADaw V �PJj. ggD7a of n i i 4 Iz• 1 A jl'; E n I. B7F7 Oi �i/ /• r s I. L ARN .eo \ I I �2••_-C_k �. .6 �I E P B9ED1sO1' 7°M D710Y-19 SERV .88 / 0.0 870.00 l O 990.0 • `L ry i• I l.s< 8x77" 11 /T;. ` PARR < le' j�ADdnor / DP -6 Op 13 ' - :-e' I a 837.3 882,0 DP -II CEN7ER CP -1 i`% 1 8690:'' B§4. A0 9337 I�\� !ICE:,-. Ca: V CP=3 711.7Nf, rx. Da I B6?O �:./yl N IFJ _ ge°: 8400 DPr3 FDX 8500 /,%4r �.`' 042.0 -e BJ.o / n RIDGE 1.2 L ` .`,:''-� % i •//�// 868.0 LJL� r� r i:'T err-rrr�� : / / v4xeEd BZ9ALE eoaD11 L 3RO30 rvp D'A CO. RD /20 E-• E� SURREY CE.1 M 1 y yFFFLLL 2 CP -2 _ xl..0-0 ATR aDD` WESCOTT JI MIL 8200 XEIGXTS 4� 1 •4 1 8230�;c CP_I��/� /,�NV,/i Op -9© WESCOTT.�! I I RDG 022:71 2NDI� I"-.. IL/ j� - 88580 1� BYBD---r �� IE' GARDEN �� cP-6: i�%� p/ J-0 l li e BB�Z,3oF.r DP 7 D ply 8060' - ^�� // -- / wt� ' " 80.3 .O 877.01 C 7932 843.7 ,,� 100. PILA N�yks_f :r JP -1'J- �,� JP -46 J 806.0 ///,��BJOA_.:� I D866;0 IP B90 D• 892 '--\ / 'G .. 872.0 B9Z may. B� 3 X \ /�jz' :1IP-3 �Ir 7 a Jam/ �. I' BB8.3 I I- gyp. ?' /�' ii 39.p l/i , .AJP-47 �. / JP -42 O J/ BB70 L9: i �. % SI/.O 2 - _ - : 84T. x 887.1_/. 8'' Jal O o/�^? /'• I:e�sa,j,',.._ ` :'>>^em 1 "t 8871 moo_ �J9pg,g3 l C1Tr �y - .a: r : JP -32 , BB7.'O _ e+ nA}•r JP- 4. Win.' \839.° �d B '� 839.0_, '• li. +�,�94Pj :IJI 8115.7 JP -44 / , J' JP -31 4 BP -I yq BP-26'� 890.7 i 8770 _; r3 ..__YY'_. s-�, --- }•___ JT:: .'Ewe06.0 ^ern. JJ_ 1-Lt7�• B1 AHK'WMK i ! . K i� �i ,�f 870.2 / NIBP-2 182s.0 bt -a 672.7 874,0 1 r 794. r \YBA / J 20.8 t 872.7 / / 1784.0 ,�,• 820.8 t BBY.O 7wilTio/ 827. B \ BP+29 /\ 812.3' t i' JP -21 -. 808.0 JJAI 86208 fB.O v L4.-12 h 8322 ® Ta- R -IS u' B3QG 1 kj 8/1 0 in B_° 8660 ` JP -Oil -b 9 1.. =36- •}p-38. 2Y _.-__ _-23 _J / 16706 01A-33 a, D - V L_ 873.2 1869.4 \ J -ed JP -34 tlP-3 // 4z � Iz' 8724 � 1 `2. Q. _, i J t 8840 _ 3j�f• 801.3 : ( B Y - nS _ 2 8900 Ji' J -r FNOALE /i '' 8930 BP -27 Ix/ '1� -i� u.� r� q.P / / 1 882.0 j JP -37 JP -48 Jp-7: PATRICK BB6D LI / gQ 39 '3!•AN I� 1 BT',p0.B730b' 1 65.0 Jp-B. BP -2S /./ry �''��i.'-.^'tom 8172 •X ry / 924.0 W BSO , \11 `�' BY00 •," / 921] li •I i/ /�l I 11B-• 930.0 Ia 8800 LP- 63 (' ] �I�/, lir/18560 - ("{ :` ` I 940.0 c A 4 g Y,° I:• 2.8-a 4t7Lti •��, IT7 :Ir --B-k - BP -24.1 918.0:...,LT(. 924.0 0, �BP=S' r•I k '-44 '' e`i ° -•i LP 874.0..1) 1' �•, I I '-''. � / 887.5. fN1�'0. a4B B m°O�• .•�At. C-. %,835 0� ;� BPI ,E: tti LF -4. ccMpREMNS1w SMR4 SLUM PLAN 28 �� 31.3 BP -18 1 n8860 I" T •833 O V3L3 e�z.7 ~ �+Be9A� E COI F e9Y� -7/ Ro ' R I B B.a sl. rti.,.. xr.,., •ggp-99 ^<.�\ gp_6 Ir 3 I f�•I,'I{1". �•1:_ I•li�{(/.J /.L -7 r'L i,:n4� �AuiLD f3Sl-\ 9/IO� .. 880.! �''\`J'� II-: _r YwY'i(-w:u1 •._4_ _ ' a+�� 1 9030 I •y.� ByP8-I6 ;� . GoL3eVllil v902.� �•.�...�� -_J�7 � _•L --;T J:,.r,l �y _ LP -40 __ Ma a' 1 ..._.6P•IS - �' L"s.ie� . {<P-41• ,SCI : -.- 890.0 -_a5P-SO ._-LP-6 "6JA, )� g99p ,, SLI+:M - 8840 1 907G .y�//�g9ypg'a : \. r'A n�.J •�:;KP: I BBBA 903D. ; ; _ T .10 � ww}�•; 4. .i•-.Lx•�•f 1� O\� ,•BP..6.PP.1\. ._I` Lr-34�'. !10900., LP -32-- „I LP -46 '. / 1 .. i✓ � `� 898 0 -I 6732 • 1 °a° aa• .N low site BATA art. w. rna■ Yraw .. Iaau r n1} rr,n• wn a ole I Ir./IICU•I AAOIA It. BAIsi11A LOr of �LI IILILAt OA 113311 •°OKI ADAM ' 1.1 ac.1011 118LA24114 ION I/ LIAIBAUI A19 1322.01`I`'OCILE it,Alto � •Yra 28---( YANKEE- Dp@OJy{ RY.i,AS YY Na.A11 BeIN1 Leu Ala IItLBAIAA 1113111\ Sia I 1 . AND110101 to 1011 /( IoUnp Naive) ' 14.3 AS. 19IIIIITIIL 114 AY. OI BAla0lI11YY1 1,0 DURING 3fALL1 PII AY.1 si11lYA BAf IItGI ta7111I IY, NII Pet 1 if Oil AVILDII/I .. ,. / . A 11 OIOOl 1 1'IleleeN tl Cl•ITT MP — .. .. ... II • 1 IIOLOOI 11 1 Ifat00l ...-r•N—.. ! N -,• 1 Stoical j,,,,. L I1110o1 It Is. ' I aYiliiwY.a iwii.A,n 11Nr.r, I/ /N. I 11 IH • •' Nr ua , Lull 14 BIT. At. oY/AC __.. 1 to 4.8 Iba 111 A01. A [ . 11 1.1 11.1 131 AII, 1 Ar 114 1 BA w f 1 is IJ 11.1 Nae BAI. L...L_ --�--- -�-- J BA. A./.0 In 11.1 Me 11l A01. IAG. 1•, r.L,. A. iA L AAA 34.4 Me t YO mm,g On•nY urs.,.•. µaiM w �t 1:C'L':ITY i!:!Y•N89' COUNTY NIG N 1 r I.�I.,Wr r.�.lwWr W z W a W • VIM". ' .sir• M • H• °a° aa• .N I.uiY - art. w. rna■ Yraw .. Iaau r n1} rr,n• wn a ole P8 r,'iA7KcE 1322.01`I`'OCILE it,Alto � •Yra 28---( YANKEE- Dp@OJy{ RY.i,AS YY Sia I 1 . idIs 1A W 1. ' J IIYO ANAP 6.0 OUTLOT D 0.8 .lc. a I 5 e w •1 �� °41TLOr / Ito., 0 ,Ir LOT ! BLOCK I 0.G.1S A N � N R W t 1 � j y w 2 WWW .'Z—• W W � w ^ 1 N 1... z Z rQ1 —1 LL = J OunoT B -i ` ; fSAr-9 O AVAe. A 1 I -- -- ( _our..y �i , LY.Y.. - 0q,0A. r A u a► •AA�N.Ll.— "SVI t�urrgwrr.r•awrur� �. j I ■[YL°N I� _ 41, -7A •w 1324.68 �I\.,.,•r.r ww.Py N 89,12,511"W M• .Nrin/ I w,wr Naw .rsM NI ,� .... rrr ,,..,,,,•„ TOMARK 2ND ADDITION. YSHEET � .�.rrw.ri, �A P24CRIPTION - OYTLOT A' TOYAIII( IST ADDITION . I OF PRELIMINARY PLAT s i I DR0.AW , 1LA� _I i SHEET UTILITY PLAN of s A UTILITIES 'LEGEND 3XINT1N11ANITANT 19 WON �9�►�--r• 111eTWo /TOWN •ARRA —N—R—R, aAINTWo RATa1NAW �6-0►RO►0926 SANITARY BIWIN —6 ) O�►• OROrO/Ne ITORN OIran ►ROr01NORAT/ARAN — 1111 DATA It.1 LAe11 •t. lutluetn mnue eou v un151o1 a m111 "SOLD 51111 1.1 Al. er low 111511:511 AOe e/ ll1un81 511 runt e000Ll 1040 ue InLURu4 1111111 Age u01O118 .ON 0{ 4W11111I 0111Ll 11.1 It. 1911811TIAL 4N u. Or tole0Rb1YR4 LO ru1186 IIALLI 111 oY.1 OI51NYR 01{ IIALI Ln[Nq 6Y. 1111 r11 1 11001 IY1L81141 1 . 1 Ole•oom 1 . I IIo160R 11 • 1 elDtoom 11 1 5101064 1_• 1 51oloDA JL. 1 1981064 tl /Y. )6 DY. MAU JLL 1I1, At, WA 1 11 4.1 16.0 It1 100. It /.1 11.1 IIT ADD. 11 6.6 11.1 too 108. 1l. 6.M Lu Lu 51.6 ua All. 1 444 14.0 11.6 1 Q CL ,L) ? Wi J �• �F— Os >1�aJy W R W It Q � J Z J O: W FP, O• ,TJV r D 7'w a a j03a 0 IL r .n O •O _ h/MIf /. Valiwl. � IIVI/ ?A ENUU FA •NT - • -! ✓ / . GB Ind" /--- —.. ._ ;. -- - - ': I - .1 : Jnd COMMERCIAL / •�__' -• . R I 'i J . • - •PLANNED DEVELOPMENT • - -�'� ''r °'' •{"��: � 7 Ind �..c � 4 '�^�� / R. R!.I �:.,� end ..m: . ,e, 71GB ,•• I JllIN \ ♦ xa�: I'� Q. n. I ..,RIII I . :A. P _� ..•,�� Ind .. — aY. P ✓ ..;� NB R-111 DIµ � -'Ind. .� '.:Y }r c -r •• , r i-+^~ o o �- R -II - Rill v jam. d vi I :.''2s*'a•'� � _ RI.1 – -- � '"- R-1' � R -I1 R-IIC% �� 'A� •,5 H5Y' �— r�srrdo`6.. ' IN Ru D V P R -II % P �y I.:: R IL�R-II R-olll 0 -11� .,91 N`., �N�pel, '�•n.�„ : II �� M'::;Ed I-• I �.� 'll _ J�1 i A R•III RB i.r R -III _ R-IIY' R -III : 41., ie �' o> ' CSC/GB/ �1 s . R -Ir RI.�f I .rt�� 1 f R -III �,,_: I p h y�.. W. z, { r R-11 I R-11 '� �w •R-II�'I.� ® R -II wh _ -:,. i'' 4�r�r� '�� •u� l "�; ...�,� µ •�•�r.FLI 3 R•1 „! •tij CSC �.:. t Ik ,� I. `.�• - 7LB R_l P SI' �raa R G R -I f' RLI :., Py1a�11yq o .041 4 �T ^ P R -II � R -II GbLF R41rl :auf. WILT W.I _y 1 ^,I y 1 ruQ1 .,t"'u3;Y ..."Fe''® 1�•.,",.,^..s.iP %'° !.r+^. ..,�— q :•r,) �.� t! '.1eiS•7 U`,., Txr J1�` — COO -7 7 VALLEY ° II ROSEMOUN�' / TOMARH 2ND ADDITION - PRELDU NARY PLAT The hearing regarding the application of Tomark Development Company for preliminary plat approval of Tomark 2nd Addition was convened by the Chairman. The Addition would consist of 25.3 acres located on Outlot A, Tomark 1st Addition with the first building containing 5 acres and 78 dwelling units. Construction has commenced on the first two buildings in the 1st Addition and it is intended that each of the Outlots for the 2nd Additionwould include an additional building. The proposed structure would be three stories with 78 dwelling units with 6 three-bedroom units, 51 two-bedroom and 21 one -bedroom units. The applicant is proposing underground parking for the building and the site plan shows 68 open parking spaces and 80 covered parking spaces, being 39 parking spaces short of the 2.5 parking spaces per unit. A request is being made to reduce the parking to 2 parking spaces per unit. Jim Hill and representatives of Tomark appeared for the applicant. They indicated that there would be more green space provided if the reduction of the parking spaces would be allowed with a 17 foot island in the parking lot. The sale price would be approximately $50,000.00 for one -bedroom, $60,000.00 for two- bedroom and $70,000.00 for three-bedroom. There were no objections from the audience. There were pool and tennis courts designed for a cluster of three buildings. Projected density is 12 units per acre in the over-all project. Zoning is R-4 and the Comprehensive Guide Plan indicates R-3 use. The appli- cant also requested reduction in the parking spaces per unit in Phase II which is now under construction, to 2.0 spaces per unit. There would be one Home- owners Association for all six buildings under the flexible Condominium Act provisions. McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat according to the following conditions: 1. A detailed landscape plan be provided for Lot 1, Block 1, Tomark 2nd Addition and an adequate landscape bond shall be provided and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 2. Authorizing 2.0 parking spaces per unit. 3. The park dedication requirement shall be determined by the Park Committee. 4. All other applicable ordinance requirements shall be met. 5. Sanitary sewer and water main shall be extended to the south limits of this proposed plat for continuation and looping through the proposed development to the south. 6. A storm sewer system shall be constructed providing for the connec- tion of the drainage basin in the southeast corner of Outlot A (DP -9) to the drainage basin in the northwest corner of Outlot D (DP -10). -79 7. The ponding easement for DP -9 as dedicated under the 1st Addition will have to be revised to conform with the approved grading plan for the proposed 2nd Addition to incorporate the 854.0 elevation. 8. Adequate easements to allow construction of sanitary sewer, water and storm facilities to service the proposed Lexington Place development to the south must be dedicated as a part of this final plat. 9. A detailed grading and drainage plan must be reviewed and approved prior to final plat approval. 10. Trunk area storm sewer assessments must be assumed for Lot 1, Block 1, of the proposed 2nd Addition as a condition of final plat approval. 11. Fire lane exits shall be required between the buildings to provide access to the back of each of the buildings. All members voted in favor. Hall then moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend to the Council that it allow a reduction in the parking spaces per unit on the Phase II building to 2.0 spaces per unit with the under- standing that the area eliminated for parking will be maintained as green space. All voted yea. • • March 10, 1982 MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: ADVISORY PARKS F, RECREATION COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION - PARKS DEDICATION - TOMARK 2nd ADDITION On Thursday, March 4, 1982 the Advisory Parks and Recreation Committee's recommendation to the City Council that Tomark 2nd Addition fulfill its park dedication requirements through a cash dedication based on the number of units and fees at time of final platting. cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner Paul Hauge, City Attorney Judy Chaffee, Planning Secretary t� • 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Seventeen REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ALPHA ADDITION E. Roger & Judith Urban for Rezoning from A to I-1 District and Preliminary Plat for Alpha Addition Consisting of Approximately 12 Acres and Containing One Lot -- Two (2) applications were re- ceived from Roger and Judith Urban: (1) a rezoning from A to I-1 consisting of 12 acres and (2) a preliminary plat for Alpha Addition consisting of approximately 12 acres and containing one lot. A public hearing was held before the APC at the February 25, 1982 meeting and the APC is recommending denial of the rezoning and preliminary plat because it may create a spot zoning and was not consistent with the land use plan. For additional information on this item, please refer to the Planning Assistant's report found on pages -1thathrough Q For additional information regarding the action t was taken y the APC, refer to page _cam_ for a copy of the minutes. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the Advisory Planning Commissions recommendation to deny the rezoning and preliminary plat for Alpha Addition. WN • 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZCNING AND PRELIMINARY PIAT - ALPHA ADDITION APPLICANT: ROGER & JUDITH URBAN LOCATION: PART OF THE SFi'n OF THE M OF SECTION 25 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 17, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVID M. OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT The first application submitted is for a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to I-1 (Light Industrial District) consisting of approximately 12 acres. The second application submitted is for a preliminary plat, Alpha Addition, con- sisting of approximately 12 acres and containing one lot. LAPID USE AND ZONING Presently, the site is zoned A (Agricultural). The land use for the proposed site is R-2 (Mixed Residential). The proposed rezoningchange bo I-1 (Light Industrial) is inconsistent with the land use plan and would reoui.re an amend- ment to the Eagan Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN AND REVIEW The subject parcel consists of approximately 12 acres and the applicant is pro- posing to construct a 2,400 square foot office building for a computer sales business. The subject parcel is bordered on the west by the Chicago, Milwau}:ee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad, on the east by the City of Inver Grove Heights and the south by Cliff Road. The proposed site plan indicates a 1 -story, 2,400 square foot office building which will be used for a small computer sales business. The building would con- sist of 600 square feet of warehouse space and the remaining 1,800 square feet would be used for office space. During normal business hours, there would be approximately 5 people working in the office. The lot coverage of the proposed building is considerably under the 35% require- ment set forth in the Eagan Zoning Ordinance. Of the 12 acres of land on this site, only 2,400 square feet will be covered by the building which calculates to less than 1/28 of lot coveraqe. CITY OF EAGAN REZONING AND PIUMdMINARV PIAT - ALPHA ADDITION FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE TVJD The parking requirement for the building acoording to Ordinance #52 would require one parking space for each 150 square feet of net leasable floor area. With the 1,800 square feet of office space, the required parking spaces are 12, which is the number being proposed by the applicant for his building. The access to this site is proposed to be taken off of Cliff Road. The site plan has accounted for the future widening and upgrading of Cliff Road. The applicant has proposed a 30' access and 24' drive aisles throughout the parking area. This site plan is. also indicating 10' x 20' parking stalls. Therefore, the entire parking area is in compliance with all requirements of the Eagan Zoning Ordinance. In reviewing the site plan, it appears as if all setback requirements are being met by the applicant. At the present time, there are no utilities located on this site. However, the applicant is proposing to install all necessary utilities on the site by himself. The site plans do indicate where the proposed drainfield and septic tanks and al- so where the proposed well will be located. Because the subject parcel is adjacent to the boundaries of Inver Grove Heights, staff has contacted that City's Planning Department to discuss this proposal. At the present time, this land is zoned Agricultural in Inver Grove Heights, and the Inver Grove Heights land use guide plan shows this area to be R-0, which are minimum 5 -acre lots. The Inver Grove Heights Planning Department anticipates no problems should this building be constructed as proposed. Staff has received from the applicant a sketch of the parcel outlining what it would look like should this area ever be developed further in the future. However, the applicant has no plans for developing this area any further. He is simply providing a preliminary sketch of the area if development does take place in the area. If approved, the preliminary plat and planned development shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comment because the plat abuts a County right-of-way. 2) The plat should be subject to all easements as required by City staff. 3) A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 4) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted prior to final plat approval. 5) The applicant will provide all necessary utilities and not object to fur- ther assessments when the utilities are installed in the area. 6) Detailed plans shall be submitted to City staff in regard to how the septic systems will be installed, and the septic systems shall meet all the build- ing code requirements and PCA req_uirarents. 1?1 CrrY OF EAGAN REZONING AND PIUMMI ]ARY PLAT - ALPIIA ADDITION FEBRUARY 25, 1982 PAGE TBFEE 7) The plat shall be subject to the Park dedication requirements. 8) All other applicable ordinances shall be followed. Dim/jach- o- � i��• � •iau i is � � r 9) A 65' half right-of-way for County Road 32 (Cliff Road) with a 10' roadway and utility easement shall be dedicated as a part of this plat. 10) A ponding easement incorporating the 916.0 elevation shall be dedicated as a part of this plat. TAC/jach PRELIMINARY PLAT OF =' ALPHA ADDITION IRE #'� .�/•.N. '�•'�tt:r�iSCALE: 1 OICN 100 FEET- lliyta-ECliff ... ld? cu..ff aaa: r = ! r ��' l 3ht•�;. Fount mc•,1�: yetwltaee /7 • • '� • PMM.ea U:A n�: T.1 (:16't LY telai1 *� �''- . a� �. .:a,•ia. _ :6nu I...a a.,.e Act, e- .. . / -•.` - Tat p.et e! t-. 3eutrrut :carter a/ the J.RbeC: 1 ' ( I 1� /, • = of S.et.cr. s. yvL'• LI• Fay. !l; .a¢e•a ]^un:r, 'C.meeot 311.y ..tera ef r. ..Steel ,ft e.• .y 11 r e! L.e :� _ Z e rnlcue a.a Y.. °avl Y tae: fl• eal treeH e eovtn ill. i..6 6 r.a of am .ut t:6. �.•6 tut :mreofer Svreeper::.J"rtz 161S • •e•rev :��. - r -toerea. 1S;: 1.•t+ Ste..t •e!rk - { J S.• �L ire 1 ./ ; �. ;�'. �.>. }. . 2 erotn: b eiv unl herr u..r ane *,ter 't. i 61 — _ f' -♦ .:�'. ';. JS... .. la+. etvna Una are a-.1.J. .. _.. - >�. td. 396, • \ tihS� r �'•'ti Z J� •t16� � _ / � L L61i . 1 PROPOSED GRADING PLAN FOR- ALPHA ADDITION Owner: Roger Urban Scale : 1 inch = 50 feet Prepared By: Delmar H. Schwanz Elevations shown are proposed Dated: 1-28-82 -11---Denotes proposed drainage Revised 2-9-82 Proposed building use: fl1800 square feet of office space 12 parking spaces 600 square feet of warehouse space. .100, 101 MfS� YRS SO'#'S\C P (,�1 ,V,6 �j✓ —938—PRpP°y /� Q o 940+N 9°z � -942 °9 c 9"�. 10. i 4r 60 30 Ty J F PROPOSED 6 / BUILDING - �- `7� Q I ST FLOOR 5. It 941 I 9405 - 910J8,; 400, 941 Ll FBF ILI 945 - !1 � r �' 1 I ... .... .. . a q . 1aa 50 ur Z Acres rand V SCALE: I INCH • 10( or Section 25, Township 27, Range 2'. 0 r 4i Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul & Pacific ... .... .. . a q . 1aa 50 ur Z Acres rand Legal Description: SCALE: I INCH • 10( or Section 25, Township 27, Range 2'. 0 lying easterly or the easterly right 4i Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul & Pacific o south 313.06 feetof..Ahe east.208.ZC Z. f Surveyor: Delmar R. S�hwanz 7'. Reg, No. 8625 1. Address: 2978 145th Street r LU Rosemount, imn.' Owc-or-Leveloper: hoger Urban Some dimensions "a scaled.; :7 Dated: January 28. 1982 1007 Cliff Road Eagan vh. 55123 1 '171 ;4kv Present Zoning.- Agriculture v': r r (j) Proposed Zoning: 1.1 (Light rndustr! Area: 1d.29 GM53 Acres -.'7 ... .... .. . a q . 1aa 50 ur Z CLIFF Acres rand Legal Description: That part of the Southeast Quarter --c or Section 25, Township 27, Range 2'. 0 lying easterly or the easterly right 4i Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul & Pacific o south 313.06 feetof..Ahe east.208.ZC Z. f Surveyor: Delmar R. S�hwanz 7'. Reg, No. 8625 1. Address: 2978 145th Street r LU Rosemount, imn.' Rotes: On site sanitary sewer and _ws Some dimensions "a scaled.; :7 Dated: January 28. 1982 1 '171 ;4kv r z CLIFF OAD.,'i-. 7'. 1 '171 ;denWi4 HTS • - y'. RB . TItr 'J GB v a u ••o: y� Ind I �� 1 :°•:.- /^!'•?. ,Ind;: T COMMERCIAL '! ^_--�-i •••w• {I iii; �. '�+ /'. !:/ PLANNED DEVELOPMENT -- .J .f,• .:��/ i Ind ........�.._,. �� I'�'�-' • Yni: �I i° ®RIII RIII i { v9 ��. _ •— r R-tl R-I� ,w...n� Ind xwn..........wT C''—�.'?" I ± - i .�..•... . _ RI _ �t:4T. ., _ _ Ind. � `C RIII+a. /•� , .; ✓,-�`S © .t . IIC��r—€ i I In ..•I Ind � '' - R-II P •' NB I L8� RNI R•I� O—�� I� RII xa y CSC- _ / p 9• _ _ n nd. r Y �Fenro. '•'r _.� �u� " I Ft's' . i r ' � � 1 - -?- R,II :'P: ., n s v •5T _ = 5: :., : N . RIII ,vr,. R-_I �R{.,. E °7 .p 7 a r a•.- RtT" RII - R- N p � R-1 R II si�k'•�. - J_� ;9R1 'gym -w ^ I ,r: P. [E •R-II-.. -� C --.a .Irr71 �;w.`, C,p • R-II.—�.. R-IIt R-III d_• R-Il %I fr �sM I N NS -I. r R-III RB 7' RIII �• )ra+:.'.1 �� • _ i-........ �.. R-III R-IR RIII R13�i' `•.i�.:�j,�i� ' iLT;. R41 CSC/GB/ � _. -J LJ LdP R_II 2 R-II �r., R-11114 'ri w •, /I N` w"AWN, .•.:'''I+' = 1 � - R•I '. Ni P I_.FFI RI t tm� 5-o •n }^ 3 J4n91 .�I CSC l'v ik 7 LB�•.. ,. : R I' Cg R-II R-II R-II- /7llvl ' ^I R-1R-II • f: s F�a iP I <.' , -° R-II •• . 3 i4 ` 4 /�.�Y 4 �� •u.il _ fit';•.-- '{."tiy„L,I r , e,rr P •vxT _yµxi 7 �y8p vs• L7 C VALLEY - i! I ROSEMOUN_ 17I A m • - AUDITOR'S SUED 042 , - r- I _ 2 A A 11 2 4400 'PK PK C P R -I -�� 460 CO 1-- `" Sar 4 '' ,��>•.�.:: � ;� : ., -- PARC Grov J .• 1` A Me 48 0 P Kple i)> -to- Nit=: aJ! r`J,�•? ,� 1. vi A LI - MAROTZf(E �� j�,t;;. �,•, ADO. Z4 � •;A3::L'J'y, .ra',••i'-''giro•`,. '') c' .i�•i: N U �0 R23W 5000 0 APC Minutes February 25, 1982 0 ALPHA ADDITION - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of Roger and Judith Urban for rezoning from (A) Agricultural to I-1 (Light Industrial) and preliminary plat approval of Alpha Addition, consisting of 12 acres was convened by the Chairman. Mr. and Mrs. Urban were present and indicated the location which is currently zoned A (Agricultural) and land use proposed for R-2 (Mixed Residen- tial) is located near the northeast intersection of Cliff Road and Highway #3. The property is bounded on the west by railroad right-of-way and on the east generally by Inver Grove Heights with 5 acre parcels proposed. The proposal is for a 2,400 square foot office building for computer sales business. Mr. Urban stated there would only be a small amount of traffic generated with 5 employees. Don Holtz, an adjacent neighbor to the southeast appeared and objected to industrial use and also indicated that the pond area would reduce the total buildable area. Marvin Fritz, an owner across Highway #3 to the west, asked about the precedent issue and there was one other objector to the Industrial zoning. Mr. Urban stated he has owned the land for about a year and a half. He has proposed that there be a septic tank and water well and there would only be a requirement of a slight revision to the Comprehensive Plan and compliance with WPC 40 for the septic tank. Inver Grove Heights zoning is R-0 for 5 acre minimun residential lots. It was noted that the multiple unit could not be constructed on the property with ceptic tank, which is the land use described. It was suggested that possibly a lower density zoning such as Commercial use might be feasible on the site. Turnham moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend denial of the application for rezoning and preliminary plat based upon the reason given above. All voted in favor. // 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Eighteen 0 OVERHILL FARM FIRST ADDITION FINAL PLAT F. Overhill Farm First Addition Final Plat Approval -- The pre- liminary plat for the Overhill Farm First Addition was approved on February 3, 1981. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval have been adhered to and the installation of public streets and utilities has been ordered for installation under Projects 321, 326 and/or 332. The development agreement has been fully executed by the developer and all other requirements have been complied with. A copy of the final plat is enclosed on page 9--,> ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny the final plat approval for the Overhill Farm First Addition and autho- rize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute final plat documents and resolution. im I-.0 W I OVERHILL FARM FIRST ADDITION O DOW"ItS IJE WE ST b INCH IaON pipe MOYUMEHTI DET AND MA0E60 DT RE41510A- TION ND. 10795. NNLDN OTHEO.WISS SHOWN. THE EAST LINE M THE - KI'aor IHe ew4,sm.s9.sf•fq IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A SaA01YQ Op 50.12190'0 ��—DOIJOTES •EIGHT ep ACCESS• DEDICATED TD DIJfOTA COYHTV OWMNa uO YTYIT Ki Nfllt wY SNOwN TNUa b 11 11 11 YIY4 is 1EIN WIDTH ANO S iO4 TEE F.CT ET LINEA 9 FLET IN WIDTH Nb AD. jpIM084 LOT LINES UYLEM ,OTHRRTHaawlaE nIDD:ATaD. 6lNCH MAYA ELEVATION 939.77 TOP NUT OF HYDEANT M 'me S.W. OUADEANT aF 000D Saab ND CUFF Gail, • ECLLe 1N FEET a !e Ne Ne laa J 1 INCH a 00 FEET —SECTION 15.T77, Fii Ialai �' M•i � LOCdTIONa fMAPN Amodehd $III vAv and EJIgkwi 10. YIE: ONEET i OF i ENEETE Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Nineteen AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE - APPLEBAUMS G. Amusement Device License for Applebaums Food Store -- An appli- cation was received to consider two (2) amusement devices at the Applebaum Food Store located in Cedarvale Shopping Center. The amusement devices proposed at that location include a frogger and centipede. The amusement devices will be located within Applebaums proper so when the store is closed, the machines will not be opera- ble. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny an amuse- ment device license for Applebaum Food Store to allow two (2) amuse- ment devices. Hi 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Twenty 40 RESOLUTION REGARDING FUNDING/I-35E A. Resolution to Consider Funding for Proposed I -35E -- The City Administrator attended a meeting at the Department of Transportation Building in the office of Commissioner Braun on March 4, 1982. The purpose of the meeting was two fold, to discuss proposed legis- lation regarding proposed I -35E and, more specifically, the Pleasant Avenue Corridor; and the second reason which directly affects the City of Eagan was MnDOT's priority decision on funding various road projects in the State of Minnesota during 1982. Apparently, MnDOT is proposing, for budget cutting reasons, to reduce the 1982 -1983 construction budget by $100,000,000. $25,000,000 will be cut back in Duluth and most of the remaining dollars will be cut back on work proposed in Washington and Dakota Counties. The amount for Dakota County totals approximately $52,000,000. The amount of money earmarked for construction in this budgetary allocation period for the biennium July 1981 through June 1982 is $109,245,000. Even with the delay of current letting dates to the rescheduled letting dates as indicated on the proposed schedule (a copy is enclosed on page 9& ), the I -35E opening should not be delayed. Commissioner Braun explained that there is approximately thirteen billion dollars in trust money tied up in Washington that is ear- marked for interstate construction. Commissioner Bruan encouraged the City of Eagan and business leaders who were in attendance in this meeting to contact federal legislators in an effort to free up this money, earmarking a portion of it for completion of inter- state work in Minnesota, and more specifically Eagan and Dakota County. A resolution has been prepared by the City Administrator for consideration by the City Council and a copy is enclosed on page q . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a reso- lution to be submitted to our United States congressional delegation regarding a request to appropriate federal funds earmarked for interstate completion of I -35E. 9 S� ' CITY OF EAGAN • RESOLUTION LEAS, a regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on March 16, 1982, at 6:30 P.M.; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan City Council strongly desires the most expeditious ompletion of I -35E in Dakota County; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes the ompletion of I -35E will have a positive and substantial impact on economic growth due to business ex- pansion in the City of Eagan and Northern Dakota County; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has been committed for approximately 27 (twenty-seven) years in maintaining a corridor alignment for the oafple- tion of I -35E through its c= comity; and WHEREAS, many businesses employing between 500 and 5,000 employees have located in the City of Eagan through the assurance of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Department that I -35E would be completed on a regular schedule; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan understands there is approximately $13 billion dollars in a Federal Interstate Trust Fund that has not been ear- marked for specific interstate completion; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Eagan City Council requests that Federal dollars be earmarked to the State of Minnesota frau the Fed- eral Interstate Trust Fund to complete the remainder of the I -35E corridor in Dakota County on the schedule that is consistent with the Minnesota Department of Transportation. DATED: Mardi 16, 1982 CITY COUNCIL CITY CF EAGAN BY: ATTEST: BY E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk State of Minnesota County of Dakota City of Fagan Beatta Blomquist, Mayor I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan at a regular meeting on March 16, 1982. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk Y�l SPECIAL NOPE: This Resolution, along with a cover letter fran the City Administrator will be sent to Minnesota's Washington delegation consisting of Senators Boschwitz and Durenberger and Congressman Hagedorn. Copies will also be sent to Governor Quie, Ccumissioner Braun, Minnesota State Senator Knutson and Representative Rodriquez. �1 Prepared March, 1982 PROPOSED SCHEDULE MAJOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION IN DAKOTA COUNTY STATE FISCAL YEARS 1982-83 (JULY 1981 - JUNE 1983) Current Resched. Biennium - Estimated Letting Letting Resched. Dollars T.H. Location Type of Work Cost Date Date Delay Delayed 35E Cedar Ave. to Grading, Brs. 9,350,000 4-82. 11-82 7 mos. Blackhawk Rd. }•�:r.,:.,:..,•,z... .,_, 35E Blackhawk Rd. Grading, Brs. 7,115,000 3-83 11-83 8 mos. 7,115,01 . - .. to CSAH 30 - 35E CSAH 30 to Grading, Brs. 14,410,000 3-83 11-83 8 mos. 14,410,0: CSAH 31 35E CSAH 31 to Grading, Br. 8,690,000 11-82 11-83 12 mos. 8,690,01 CSAH 26 35E CSAH 26 Inter- Grading, Br. 4,980,000 6-82 --- No Delay change -_- - 35E Mendota Hts. Rd. Grading, Br. 2,500,000 4-82 --- No Delay - - -- - to TH 110 - 35E Cedar Ave. to Surfacing, 2,935,000 3-83- 11-83 8 mos. 2,935,01 CSAH 30 Misc. 35E CSAH 26 Inter- Surfacing, 1,430,000 4-83 8-83 4 mos. 1,430,01 - change Misc. 35E Mendota Hts. Rd. Surfacing, g 2,080,000 4-83 1-84 9 mos. 2,080,01 TH 110 Misc. 77 140th St. to Grading, Br. 3,910,000 6-82 --- No Delay TH 35E -' - - 55 Blue Gentian Rd. Grading, Surf., I 1,900,000 3-82 -- No Delay to S. Jct. TH Signals 149 ...... _ 149 TH 494 to N. Jct Grading, Surf, 800,000 4-83 6-83 2 mos. 800,0( TH 55 494 TH 55 to 0.5 Mi. Grading, Brs. 16,350,000 4-82 --- No Delay s , W of TH 149 6-82 • ' --- - 494 TH 55 to 0.5 Mi. Surfacing, 4,760,000 4-83 1-84 9 mos. 4,760,0( ...:.::rir:-:a;izs.;`:,=:k.,.ii.'r`.'•';;_; W of TH 149 Misc. 494 0.5 Mi. W of to Grading, Br., 9,815,000 4-83 6-83 2 mos. 9,815,0( 0.5 Mi. E of Surf., Misc. •'x..k`a*us^' y x...wCti &,:3?.,Y'';w:ga.i TH 149 494 Babcock Trail to Grading, Brs., 12,605,000 3-83 --- No Delay So. St. Paul Surf., Misc. 494 24th Ave. to Grading, Brs., 13,700,000 9-82 --- No Delay - Minn. River Br. Surf., Misc. �- (Henn. Co.) *i Misc. Projects 5,615,000 • (Safety, Br., - Resurf., etc.) TOTALS (does not include 109,245.000 52,035,OC Henn. Co, portion 557,210,0(10 to remain of I-494) scheduled in FY 1982-83. NOTE: Projects already let during FY 1982-83 in Dakota County total $10.070,474. Cost to complete Interstate in Dakota County - Post FY 1983 (after rescheduling) - I -35E - 541,180,000 I-494 - 39,480,000 - µ:F ^t•t =s Total $80,660,000 /� " 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Twenty -One El CAROL LINDO/ASSESSMENTS A. Carol Lindo Discussion Regarding Assessments -- Mrs. Carol Lindo has requested on the March 16 agenda (please refer to the letter enclosed on page 99 ) asking for consideration on various assessments levied against her property in Vienna Woods. A similar request was reviewed by the City Council regarding an agreement with Mr. Bump and his obligations on three (3) lots in Vienna Woods for street assessments. The City did cooperate by working with Mr. Bump and Mrs. Lindo and those assessments were respread to Mr. Bump's property. Apparently, Mrs. Lindo has her property for sale, but is having some difficulty and would like- some sort of financial relief regarding the assessments levied against her property. Without the City staff spending considerable time re- viewing the records of Mrs. Lindo's assessments, if action is to be taken directing any additional relief for assessments levied against Mrs. Lindo's property, the staff should be directed to prepare a report for further review by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To deny the request by Mrs. Lindo or to order the City staff to research the assessments and prepare a memorandum for review and additional consideration by the City Council at a future meeting. zo r � 444 - We- /t SH FEB 25 :82 0 0 Agenda Information March 11, 1982 Page Twenty -Two REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF LAHASS COMMERCIAL REVENUE BONDS C. Request for Extension of Commercial Revenue Bonds for LaHass Mr. Frank J. Hassleman is requesting an extension until June 1, 1983 to consider issuance of commercial revenue bonds that were approved on March 18, 1980 for a project on Hwy. 13. Mr. Hassleman is sending a letter to the City making a formal request; a copy should be enclosed with the administrative agenda on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny an exten- sion of time for commercial revenue bond funding due to the slump in the economy and uncertainty of the future until June 1, 1983 for LaHass. POSTING BOARD FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT D. Posting Board for Police Department Building -- Mayor Blomquist and City Administrator Hedges have discussed the possibility of adding one additional posting place to the current posting place at City Hall. The new posting place for all official notices of meetings and other information could be in the vestibule of the Police Department building. Since the Police Department building is open twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, an inside reader board would be available to the public at any time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny an in- terior reader board to allow posting of meeting notices and other related documents at the Police Department Building. s/Thomas LHedges Cit�dministrator lU� a 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 12, 1982 SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL Height Limitations Enclosed is a memorandum from City Attorney Hauge that provides legal procedure on the final adoption of amendment to ordinance #52 pertaining to height limitations. (Pages 10'7> through 10 ) Cedar School Letter Enclosed on pages /05' through pared by the City TUmInnistrator of Schools for District #191 at regarding proposed and designate Letter of Commendation d/04 is a copy of the letter pre- and—submitted to the Superintendent the direction of the City Council use of Cedar School. Enclosed on pages 107 through /09' is a letter of thanks to the public safety departments. Protective Inspections Monthly Reports for January & February Enclosed on pages 109 through 110 are copies of the monthly inspection reportso�rotective Inspections. Dakota County Court & Jail Facility Enclosed on pages 111 through 112 is a copy of a letter and attached resolution r�ing'theocat on of a Dakota County court and jail facility. The City Administrator will be attending the Dakota County Board of Commissioners meeting on March 16, 1982 and will have a report for the City Council. Public Works Questions Raised by City Council at Special Meeting ot2=£5-8 There were several questions proposed to the City Administrator at the special City Council meeting that was held on February 25, 1982. Since they pertained to public works, these questions were passed on to the Director of Public Works and his response is found on pages I I -A> through 11 . /0 / a Information Memo March 12, 1982 Page Two Q Public Works Committee Meeting for 3-11-82 A memorandum discussing several issues that were addressed by the public works committee at a scheduled meeting on March 11, 1982 is enclosed on pages IIS through [if for your review. s/Thomas LHedges (ity Ki. /OZ PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER r7 L__I HAUGE. wSmrm, Eum & I1ELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (8T. PAUL). MINNESOTA 58122 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 March 5, 1982 RE: Ordinance No. 52 - Height Limitations Dear Tom: AR" COOS 512 THLEPHOM[ 454.4224 The Height Limitations Subcommittee submitted a proposal to the Advisory Planning Commission for its review on February 23, and later the City Council reviewed and acted on the proposed changes to Ordinance No. 52 regarding height limitations in Industrial and Commercial Districts. There has been a very short period of time between the Planning Commission and City Council to draft a ordinance revision and did not offer the'staff much time to con- sider all aspects of the revisions. Dale Runkle and I have talked over the amendments in detail and because of the changes, the Council suggested on March 2, we would recommend that the Advisory Planning Commission hold a formal hearing on the amendment at its next regular meeting and then the Council act on the recommendations of the Advisory Planning Commission. Some of the reasons are as follows: 1. There are some substantial changes to the draft that was submitted to the council on March 2 and would suggest that the Planning Commission and Council again review these changes. 2. The specific interpretation of the ordinance is that there be a formal public hearing, although it is my opinion that there has been a good deal of public exposure over the last three months, notices in the newspapers, dis- cussion at both planning commission and council hearings concerning the re- visions, and also the meeting of the Height Limitation Subcommittee with notices being posted at the City Hall. 3. The Advisory Planning Commission had asked that the draft be returned to the Commission for review and this will offer them an opportunity to do so. 4. Dale and I have been discussing the impact on planned development dis- tricts and it is our opinion that it is not necessary to specifically provide under the PD provision of the ordinance any wording regarding lifting the height limitation because the use that the Council approved for the PD district would then control. For instance, if the council approved the commercial use, then the developer would be controlled by the specific provisions of the ordinance of that district and also limitations put on by the Council, and the special agreements. /O 3 Mr. Thomas Hedges March 5, 1982 Page 2 T/rro' 5. This would also give the Planning Commission and CouncilAto determine whether there are any specific provisions that it would want to insert rela- tive to the concerns that were raised regarding allowing height limitations to be removed along the bluff line of the Minnesota River Valley. PHH:ras W, yours, H. Hauge 1 BEA BLOMOU15T MAYOR .. THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR • THOMAS ELAN CITY OF EAGAN EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE JAMES A. SMITH CITY CLERK JODORE � THEODORE WS ACHT ACMTER 31!! PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMBERS .-,,,,_% P.O.I Ilw , EAGAN, MINNESOTA 551!! PHONE 454.8100 0 March 10 1982 DR THEODORE FOOT ~` SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 191 100 RIVER RIDGE CT BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Re: Proposed Use of Cedar School Building Located in the Cit} Dear Dr. Foot: At the last regular meeting of the Eagan City Council held on Tues- day, March 2, 1982, I was directed by the City Council to write a letter to Independent School District #191 to request information regarding the proposed use of Cedar School after its official closing this year. Since Cedar Elementary School is located within the City of Eagan adjacent to a residential neighborhood, the City Council is con- cerned about the proposed use of Cedar School upon its official closing this year. The City of Eagan has completed a comprehensive guide plan and this property is shown as a public facilities use. The City of Eagan has expended many hours analyzing the overall land use for the community and is satisfied with the land use balance proposed in the guide plan. Therefore, the City is con- cerned that the school district does not consider other types of land use for the Cedar Elementary School such as a commercial use. Since the City of Eagan has an adequate designation of commercial land throughout the City, this site shall maintain a land use integrity that is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The City of Eagan has also worked through a cooperative arrangement with your school district to provide ballfields for many age groups at Cedar Elementary School. The City is concerned that this land will be kept available for recreational and athletic events, unless the property is disposed of by the school district. Many of the users of the recreational area are residents of Independent School District #191; therefore, the City is hopeful that maintenance will continue on the ball diamonds and other recreational areas within the school grounds. 05THE/05- THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY City of Eagan/Cedar Elementary School March 10, 1982 Page Two The City of Eagan would appreciate being advised of any proposed uses that the school district might consider for the Cedar Ele- mentary School building and property. If our staff or City Council can be of any assistance in your planning process, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedg s City Administrator TLH/hnd W� BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER COUNCIL MEMBERS March 4, 1982 MICHAEL GAISBAUER 3431 HIGHLANDER DR EAGAN MN 55122 Dear Mr. Gaisbauer: a. CITY. OF EAGAN .y ,•,&M$ PILOT KNOBdROAD d"?l-I 'P.O. BOK 311" i ^ ' EAGAN, MI N NESOTA� PHONE 4544100'^- Tom. THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE CITY CLERK Your letter was received today and will be copied to the Mayor, members of the City Council, Police and Fire Departments. It is extremely rewarding to all of us who are either employed or serve your local government to have the type of input you provided in your letter. Thank you for your time and appreciation. It is definitely motivational to our Police and Fire Departments. Sincerely, c6ft1A� Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd lo -7 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. N f MAR =t 1982 /og • .larch 2, 19.92_ PROTECTIVE L`15PFCTIOD_�S DAIMILY REPORT January, 1932 (2nd Revision) LNSPFCTIOPI/OFFICF MJRS Puilding g Plumbing MVAC Administrative/Office Fire Marshal Miscellaneous General Office Permit Processing A'LP-M R OF PpR M IMM Building Plumbing AVAC Electric Water Softener Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank Signs NATUPr OF BUILDING PFRNQTS ISSUED This 1-bnth —P7__ 92.5 27.5 320.0 17.0 30.0 104.0 52.5 This Month 21 16 49 51 6 0 1 Year -Tb -Date 57.0 92.5 27.5 320.0 17.0 30.0 164.0 52.5 Year -Tb -Date 21 16 49 51 6 0 1 Number I Tme Units Valuation Permit Fee Plan check Fee Fee 5 Single Family 5 "19,000.00 $1,675.5n $837.75 --Total $ 8,207.75 0 Duplex 0 0 0 0 0 12 Multi-Fami1y 12 $540,001.00 $3,126.00 $1,563.00 $18,219.00 0 Com. Tical 0 0 0 0 n 0 Industrial 0 n 0 0 0 0 Institutional 0 0 0 0 0 0 Res. Garsae 0 0 0 0 0 0 Swim. Pool 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 14iscellaneous 4 $ 10, 700.00 $ 125.50 $23.25 $ 159.75 I 21 iiu AIS 21 1$889,700.00 $4,^')7.00 $2,429.00) $26,546..5n * Total Fees Include: Puilainct permit Fee, Sts -Charge, Plan Merl- Fee, SA(: Unit Fee, Mater- Conmection Fee, Pater Meter Fee and Road Unit Fee /09 . PROTFCTIVF WSPrMOt_TS • Parch 2, 19.92 1101m;.Y RFFORT Febmarv, 1982 Mmised) MIMECTIODI/OFFICF POURS Building Plumbing HVAC Administrative/Office Fire Marshal Miscellaneous General Office Permit Processing MUMBFR OF PM1ITS ISSUED Building Pltanbing HVAC Electric Water Softener )dell, Cesspool, Septic Tank signs m=. OF RunmIv PFAms ISSUED This t bnth 85.0 69.5 36.0 263.0 2.0 7.5 93.0 51.0 This Month 33 34 19 23 4 0 2 Year -To -Date 142.0 162.0 63.5 583.0 19.0 37.5 197.0 103.5 Year -To -Date 54 50 64 74 10 0 3 Nur,ber 10 I Twe Si ..le Famil IIni.ts 10 Valuation 3554,000.00 Permit Fee $2.,954.50 Plan (heck: Fee $1,477.2.5 Total Fee $15,759.25 2 Dmle_x 2 $ 93,000.00 $ 557.00 S 274.50 $ 3,094.50 16 Multi-Family 16 5697,000.00 $3,01.3.00 51,506.50 522,505.00 1 10M.Merical 1 S 1,500.00 $ 25.00 - - - $ 26.00 0 Industrial 0 0 0 0 0 Institutional 0 0 0 0 0 0 Res. (.rave 0 0 0 0 0 0 swim. Pool 0 0 0 0 0 4 (Miscellaneous 4 S 13,900.00 S 146.50 S 31.25 S 7.85.2.5 33 ;=-ALS 33 ($1,364,400.0 $6,696.00 S3, 7.93.50 X1,570.00 * Total Fees Include: Puilling Permit Fee, Sts -Charge, Plan ('iec.1; Fee, SAC lfiit Fee, Mater Connection Fee, I•later .Meter Fee and Poad Unit Fee //U '°^."PHONE 454.8100 March 9, 1982 FRED JOY ADMINISTRATOR DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 W HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 Re: Location of a Dakota County Court & Jail Facility Dear Mr. Joy: THOMASHEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLERK In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on Tuesday, March 2, 1982, a resolution, similar to the resolution passed by the City of Apple Valley, encouraging the Dakota County Board of Commissioners to consider construction of a combination court/jail facility in northwestern Dakota County at a site located in the City of Eagan was approved unanimously. A copy of said resolution is enclosed for your review and distribu- tion to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners. The City of Eagan has demonstrated its cooperativeness in working previously with County projects and is certainly willing to work with the Dakota County Board of Commissioners on a site if chosen in the City of Eagan in the general vicinity of Cliff Road and I -35E and/or the drivers' training center. Sincerely, c;�.M..1,�4 Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd cc: Dakota County Commissioner John Voss THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. BEA SLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMAS EGAN CITY OF EAGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS , ' THEODORE WACHTER 5795 PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMBERS P.O. BOX 211" EAGAN, MINNESOTA 551n '°^."PHONE 454.8100 March 9, 1982 FRED JOY ADMINISTRATOR DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 W HWY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 Re: Location of a Dakota County Court & Jail Facility Dear Mr. Joy: THOMASHEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CITY CLERK In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on Tuesday, March 2, 1982, a resolution, similar to the resolution passed by the City of Apple Valley, encouraging the Dakota County Board of Commissioners to consider construction of a combination court/jail facility in northwestern Dakota County at a site located in the City of Eagan was approved unanimously. A copy of said resolution is enclosed for your review and distribu- tion to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners. The City of Eagan has demonstrated its cooperativeness in working previously with County projects and is certainly willing to work with the Dakota County Board of Commissioners on a site if chosen in the City of Eagan in the general vicinity of Cliff Road and I -35E and/or the drivers' training center. Sincerely, c;�.M..1,�4 Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/hnd cc: Dakota County Commissioner John Voss THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. 0 CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION 6 LOCATION OF A DAKOTA COUNTY COURT & JAIL FACILITY WHEREAS, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners is considering the construction of a combination Court/Jail facility in northwestern Dakota County, and WHEREAS, this consideration has been in process for a considerable amount of time, and WHEREAS, the Council has been advised that Dakota County is currently considering acquiring property on Cliff Road, in the vicinity of the Drivers' License Examining Station in Eagan, and WHEREAS, this City Council is willing to cooperate with Dakota County on a northwestern Dakota County location for a combination Court/Jail facility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan as follows: 1. That this City Council does continue to support the location of a combination Court and Jail facility in northwestern Dakota County. 2. That from a County—wide perspective,: the operating efficiency of the County Sheriff's office and the Dakota County Court system would be enhanced by Court/Jail facilities in northwestern Dakota County, inasmuch as more than 50 percent of the Felony offenses, gross misdemeanor offenses, juvenile petitions and intakes are processed within the Cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan and Lakeville. 3. Location of a Court/Jail facility in northwestern Dakota County would help the efficiency of the area police departments via less travel time to court proceedings, appearances at the jail, etc. 4. A majority of the Dakota County population resides in the Cities of Burnsville, Apple Valley, Eagan and Lakeville. As such, the location of a Court/Jail facility in this area would be a convenience and benefit to the public. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be forwarded to members of the Dakota County Board of Commissioners. . Dated: March 2, 1982 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN 'ST• (k s —&I By: City eryor � Z� TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS C� DATE: MARCH 9, 1982 RE: CITY COUNCIL WORK ORDER REQUEST - FEBRUARY 25. 1982 In response to your mane of March 8, the following is the Public Works Department's response to those specific items of concern addressed by the City Council: 1. I can appreciate the Council's concern pertaining to the traffic adjacent to the Orvilla Homes and the resulting safety concerns for the related handicapped individuals. There presently does not exist any standard sign available that would warn the travel- ing public that handicapped individuals are in the immediate vi- cinity. I am presently working with our traffic sign supplier to deteanine if similar requests have been processed and if not, to work out a design for a specific installation such as this location. In any event, we will insure that some type of identi- fication sign will be installed both north and southbound inform- ing the traveling public of special caution required. We can post an advisory speed limit sign of 20 rrph on the same post that the handicapped advisory sign would be installed on. We will install a 20 mph advisory speed limit sign unless we receive a directive to do otherwise. As soon as these signs are installed, I will notify the Council accordingly. 2. We will order the necessary similar advance'firestation warning signs and will have them installed on Rahn Road for Fire Station #1 and on Pilot Knob Road and Wilderness Run Road for Fire Station No. 3 similar to those that have been installed for Fire Station #2. Upon the completion of their installation, we will inform the Council accordingly. 3. We will add the request for a major intersection street light on County Road 30 at Heine-Strasse Lane as a part of the major inter- section street lighting report to be presented to the Council dur- ing this spring. 4. If, at the time of this memo, the stop sign has not been replaced at the intersection of the Minnesota Federal service drive with Rahn Road, we will either have our crews replace it if we were responsible or require Minnesota Federal to replace it if their private snow removal contractor created the damage. We will in- form you when this work has been completed. 11 -2 a 0 Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator March 9, 1982 Page two We appreciate these items being brought to our attention so that we can respond accordingly. Please let us know if there are any other mainte- nance items that need a response by the Public Works Department. TAC/jack cc - Bill Branch, Superintendent 1/4f MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT DATE: MARCH 11, 1982 SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING, 3-11-82 The Public Works Committee met in the office of the Public Works Director at 8:00 a.m. on Thursday, March 11, 1982. Several issues were discussed with the following comments, status reports and/or recommendations to be forwarded to the City Council for their infor- mation: I. BEACON HILLS/BROWNS POND STORM SEWER OUTLET Mr. Richard Scherrer had contacted several Council members re- questing consideration of the potential damage associated with the storm sewer lift station water discharge that flows across his property north of Cliff Road and east of Thomas Lake Road. The background and history pertaining to the installation of this temporary lift station was discussed in detail. Because of the existing ground cover conditions, it is not possible to evaluate if Mr. Scherrer has experienced any damages resulting from erosion of this storm water flow. RECOMMENDATION: Staff contact Mr. Scherrer and inform him that when the snow cover has disappeared the public works committee will meet with him on the site and will evaluate the impact the storm sewer lift station discharge has across his property through a test pumping of the lift station. II. CITY LICENSING OF CONTRACTORS A status report was discussed pertaining to a potential new ordi- nance for the City of. Eagan requiring a licensing of various con- tractors performing work within the City. Chief Building Official Dale Peterson presented a sample of a survey to be sent to other communities requesting information regarding similar situations. Upon completion of this survey, a status report will be prepared and brought back to the public works committee. RECOMMENDATION: None at this time. III. SNOW PLOWING POLICIES/PROCEDURES At the February 16 Council meeting, the Mayor referred the snow plowing complaint to the public works committee pertaining to snow removal at her residence. A copy of the Mayor's letter and the Public Works Director's response was made available to the public works committee. After reviewing the information and the present i/s Public Works Committee March 11, 1982 Page Two snow removal policy of the Public Works Department, the public works committee commended the maintenance division for its excellent job of snow removal this past winter season while expressing regrets that isolated incidents such as this do happen to occur. It was the committee's concurrence that incidences similar to this one are inherent when trying to provide snow removal for the approximate 21,000 citizens in this community. The committee did not feel that this isolated incident warranted any change or revision to the existing snow removal policy or procedures. RECOMMENDATION: Isolated incidents should not change an otherwise overall good snow removal policy and/or program but should be dealt with on an individual basis while trying to minimize similar situa- tions in the future. IV. 1982 LOAD LIMIT RESTRICTIONS The public works committee was informed on concerns by the Public Works Department pertaining to continued load limit restrictions notification and enforcement within the City of Eagan. The Public Works Department performed a limited survey of the following neigh- boring communities within Dakota County pertaining to standardizing load limit criteria: Apple Valley, Inver Grove Heights, Burnsville, Lakeville, West St. Paul and Rosemount. All communities, with the exception of Rosemount, do not post any seasonal load restric- tions. Rosemount, while they do post load limit restrictions, has never issued a tag for violation for an overweight vehicle. The Dakota County Highway Department, while they postload limit restrictions on certain county roads, has limited enforcement due to the extensive issuance of permits to whomever requests a variance from this load limit restriction. None of the communities have portable scales available to check overweight vehicles and the courts have indicated that in order to enforce weight violations, both the scale the operator must have been certified by the Minne- sota Department of Weights and Measures to allow it to stand up in court. Also, if a community is lax in its enforcement or freely issues permits, the weight violations are often dismissed by the courts. Subsequently, none of the communities surveyed attempt to provide adequate enforcement. In the past the City has continued to post the same streets and areas for weight limit restrictions without performing an adequate evaluation as to need. This is what precipitated the need for the survey to determine a uniform method and criteria for deter- mining load limit restrictions. In summary, the Public Works De- partment feels that the annual posting of load limit restrictions within the City of Eagan should not be provided for in 1982 for the following reasons: 116 0 Public Works Committee March 11, 1982 Page Three 1. It takes the Public Works Maintenance Division approximately two -three days to install these signs with a similar length of time for their removal. 2. Discussions with the Police Department indicate that enforcement is very difficult without portable scales and conviction for violiations are practically non-existent, resulting in voluntary compliance with posted signs being the only practical means of enforcement. 3. Administrative work load associated with the issuance of special permits for garbage trucks, school buses, moving vans, MTC buses, and other specific special case requests cannot effi- ciently and effectively be handled by the present manpower available. After taking these permit vehicles into considera- tion, the percentage of violating vehicles is such a small factor in relationship to the total volume of traffic that enforcement is not practical and resulting damage is minimal compared to the amount of work effort put into trying to enforce these wight limit restrictions. 4. Those vehicles abiding by the County road weight limit restrictions would sufficiently meet the weight limit restric- tions anticipated to be posted by the City. Therefore, we will receive a similar benefit on our roads through enforcement of the County's weight limit.restrictions. RECOMMENDATION: Temporarily disband 1982 weight limitrestriction program and evaluate its effects for further study and recommenda- tion for future years for weight limit restriction posting as re- quired. V. WATER TREATMENT PLANT CONSIDERATION The public works committee reviewed the results of the survey per- formed by the City of Eagan in the fall of 1981 combined with the response at the public hearing held on January 12, 1982 and the information associated with each of the various alternatives per- taining to a water treatment plant for iron/manganese removal and/or hardness reduction. There was concern expressed pertaining to the approximated $10,000,000 facility for the full fledged treatment plant that was discussed in previous reports on Project 338. It was determined that there have been no requests or desires. for a central hardness reduction (water softening) plant. Therefore, it was determined that further discussion pertaining to the feasi- bility of a centralized water reduction plant is no longer warranted. With a decision pertaining to the elimination for consideration of a hardness reduction plant, the public works committee feels that a further more detailed study should be performed pertaining to more accurate cost analysis for a limited iron/manganese removal 117 a Public Works Committee March 11, 1982 Page Four plant only. It was felt, iaith.-this idditionalfuture information in a more detailed and accurate. form due to its limited scope of study for iron/manganese removal plant only, that the staff could issue a new survey containing cost information to the community through future spring or summer newsletters. It was recommended that another public hearing be followed as closely as possible to the return of the surveys during the summertime so that the people who are experiencing the problems an opportunity to respond during the time of their problems. It is felt that this step will provide the Council with more accurate information in order to make the most beneficial and intelligent decision pertaining to an item that will affect the community from here on out. The committee felt that these further studies were necessary due to the size of the project that the Council would be considering and taking into consideration the long term impact pertaining to future water quality for existing and future residences and future commercial and industrial developments that will occur within this community. The committee was concerned with potential future state and federal requirements pertaining to strict rules of water conservation which might restrict the use of flushing of systems to eliminate the present rusty water problem. RECOMMENDATION: In summary, the public works committee is making the following recommendtions for consideration: 1. Eliminate the hardness reduction from further consideration for the treatment of water quality. 2. Restudy and refine the costs associated with a limited iron/ manganese removal treatment plant only. 3. Prepare and distribute a new survey with new cost information with the spring or summer 1982 newsletters. 4. Conduct a public hearing immediately following the response of the survey format during the summer of 1982. The public works committee will be available at the City Council meeting of March 16 to discuss in further detail these issues and resulting recommendations with the full Council. The public works committee meeting was adjourned at 9:40 a.m., March 11, 1982. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert Director of Public Works TAC/hnd liq