Loading...
04/20/1982 - City Council RegularAGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL APRIL 20, 1982 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 — ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:33 — ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:35 — DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS e.1 A. Fire Department e.3 C. Park Department q.3 B. Police Department P 5 D. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 — CONSENT ITEMS (One motion approves all items) Q.S A. Project 264B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Twin View Manor Streets) �.!D� B. Project 284B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 1st Addition Streets) P,C C. Project 293B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (o(Windcrest 1st Addition Streets) D. Project 308B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing P (Duckwood Trails Streets) Q. 6 E. Contract 80-28, Approve Final Payment/Accept Project (Sanitary Sewer T.B.) 6 F. Approve Grading Permit, Clearview 3rd,Addition (Joe Peterson) 7 G. Approve Grading Permit, Parcel 10-00200-030-32 (Mary Eggum) e 1 H. Approve Grading Permit, Parcel 10-00200-020-30 (Mary Eggum) P I. Contract 81-5, Change Order #J,(Univac Trunk Water Main) e J. MnDOT Cost Participation Agreement #60845, Project 302 (I-494 e Phase Two Trunk Storm Sewer Construction) Pct K. Execution of 911 Grant Agreement 17.L. Determination of Excess Property ?11#,M. Amusement Device Renewals P.Ib N. Trailer Permit Renewals V. 7:00 — PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Final Assessment Hearing, Addition Utilities) 20 B. Final Assessment Hearing, e Utilities) VI. OLD BUSINESS Project 323A (Coachman Land Co. First Project 336A (Tomark First Addition P,22. A. U. S. Homes Corporation for a Preliminary Plat (Lexington Place) Consisting of Approximately 84.62 Acres Located in Part of the W� of the SW1: of Section 14 (east of Lexington Road and north of Wescott Road) 9-4'L B. Discussion Regarding Proposed Conditions for Super America Plat e, q.$ C. Request for 24 Hour Operation to Serve Food for Southfork Restaurant Eagan City Council Agenda April 20, 1982 Page Two VII. NEW BUSINESS Q•5 S A. Signcrafters Outdoor Display, Inc., Charles Peugh, for a Pylon Business sign on Property Located on 2755 Highway 55, Located in Part of the NWk of Section 2. b1 B. Donald Rasmussen for a Variance for a Garage Setback at 1525 Q' Cliff Road, Located in the SE'y of Section 28 67 C. Countryside Builders, Inc., Jerry Lagro, for a Preliminary Plat, Oakwood Heights, Consisting of Approximately 9.59 Acres for Townhouse Development Located in Part of the N� of the SEk of Section 26 (Located east of Wedgewood Drive in the Wilderness Run Road Area) e•g(o D. Midwestern Associates, Orrin Aune, for Preliminary Plat, Lone Oak Heights, Consisting of Approximately 14 Acres Located in Part of the NE'k of the NE'g of Section 9 (Located south of Lone Oak Road and west of Pilot Knob Road) fol E. Zachman Homes, Inc., Steve Ryan, for Preliminary Plat, Cinnamon Q' Ridge 3rd Addition, Consisting of 5 Single Family Lots, 28 Single Family Cluster Lots and 9 Twin Home Lots Located in Part of Outlot B, Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition in Section 30 (Located north of Cliff Road and west of Cedar Avenue Freeway) P•�1� F. Diamond Lake, Inc., Request Public Hearing to Consider IRB Financing in the Amount of $750,000 p 133 G. Final Plat — Countryside Villa (Jerry Lagro) VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 135 A. Joint Burnsville/Eagan Joint Cable Commission Update t3j B. Contract 82-4, Approve Plans & Specifications/Order Advertisement Q for Bids (Twin View Manor 2nd Addition, et al, Streets) 136 C. Brittany Manor, Assessment Petition Consideration IX. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 16, 1982 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval of the April 6, 1982 regular City Council minutes and the April 20, 1982 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for. consideration: DEPARTMENT HEAD:-BUS'INES'SI FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- Fire Chief Childers received a copy of a resolution that was recently adopted by the City Council of Inver Grove Heights at the recommendation of their Volunteer Fire Depart- ment requesting the University of Minnesota regents to reconsider their decision to close the F.I.R.E. Center and to continue funding to assist the volunteer fire fighters. The F.I.R.E. Center has been offered as a service and program through the University of Minnesota for years to volunteer fire departments around the State of Minnesota. The F.I.R.E. Center provides a library equipped with films and training material, training manuals and many other educational resourses that would have to be duplicated by munici- palities if the center is closed. The center also provides a three (3) day training seminar each May for volunteer fire fighters where equipment is demonstrated and fire suppress techniques are presented to the fire fighters. Fire Chief Childers is requesting that the City Council pass a resolution similar to the resolution adopted by the City of Inver Grove Heights requesting that the University of Minnesota Board of Regents reconsider their action to provide this centralized service. A copy of a resolution to be considered by the City of Eagan is enclosed on page o1 for your reference. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny a reso- lution requesting the University of Minnesota regents reconsider their decision to close the F.I.R.E. Center and continue their funding to assist volunteer fire fighters. 0 9 CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION RESOLUTION REQUESTING UNIVERSITY REGENTS TO RECONSIDER THEIR DECISION TO CLOSE F.I.R.E. CENTER AND TO CONTINUE THEIR FUNDING TO ASSIST VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS WHEREAS, the Eagan Volunteer Fire Department is dedicated to providing Fire Education, Fire Prevention and Fire Suppress- ion activities to the residents of Eagan, and, WHEREAS, to provide these services, requires research, coordination, communication and advise, and, WHEREAS, with the cutbacks in the Federal Government, few sources for adsistance exist and., WHEREAS, the F.I.R.E. Center at the University of Minnesota has provided this assistance to the Eagan Volunteer Fire Depart- ment on a regular basis in past years, and, WHEREAS, the University of Minnesota is proposing to close the F.I.R.E. Center for budgeting reasons. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the City Council of Eagan requests the University Regents to reconsider their decis- ion to close the F.I.R.E. Center and to continue their funding to assist the Volunteer Firefighters of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That copies of this resolution be forwarded to the University of Minnesota Board of Regents and neighboring volunteer firefighters. Adopted by the City Council of Eagan this 20 day of April, 1982. City Council Dated: April 20, 1982 City of Eagan ATTEST: E.J. VanOverbeke City Clerk 11 By: Beatta Blomquist, Mayor Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Two 9 POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered at this time for the Police Department. PARK DEPARTMENT C. Park Department --I. Directional Signs to City/Community Parks -- Director of Parks an Recreation raa was regeste by the Council to research the cost of informational/directional signs for locating Eagan community parks. Mr. Vraa is suggesting two options which are available to the City Council. Option 1 would be to install a placard on street signs to indicate the park name and an arrow of direction. Cost of these signs would be approxi- mately $14.00 each and could be made to coincide with the color of exisiting street signs or a different color to stand out better the motorist. These signs would be attached just below the existing signs. Option 2 would be to errect a completely separate sign and post which would be approximately 24" x 24". These individual signs which would also contain the park name would be errected at locations other than the street corner identification signs. However, the cost of these signs would be approximately $35 to $40 each. The higher cost is due to the set up charge required for each sign, plus additional costs for posts. The City Adminis- trator and Director of Parks and Recreation are seeking direction on this issue. 2. Garden Plots -- At the last City Council meeting, a question was raised by City Councilmember Smith as to whether the City has suitable vacant park land which could be used for garden plots on an interim basis. Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa has researched this matter and a copy of his response in enclosed on page- The City Administrator and Director of Parks and Recre- ation wi be seeking direction from the City Council on this issue. 3 0 April 14, 1982 MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR OM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: GARDEN PLOTS At the April 6th council meeting, Councilman Smith questioned whether the City had suitable vacant park land which might be used for garden plots on a interim basis. I briefly reviewed the files and done a windshield survey of some of our existing park land to determine whether such a program could be insti- tuted. Briefly, the City has allowed some gardening to take place on un- developed park land. Primarily, this has been south of River Hills addi- tion in the area beneath the power lines. This area has been used strictly by adjacent residents and has not been offered to members of the community as a whole. I have tried to identify some areas which might be suitable for community use as garden plots and have identified the following: Pilot Knob Park: just east of the tennis courts off of Towerview Road, and Coachman Park: off of Coachman Road. In addition, I looked at the possi- bility of using the recently acquired Rahn Park area, some area by Patrick Eagan Park and an area within Capricorn and Wedgewood Parks. Because of the very limited space available at Patrick Eagan, which the City might find desirable for expansion of its nursery area, I would not like to see this used. And, the Capricorn/Wedgewood area is somewhat inaccessible at this time because of the condition of Lexington Avenue. Rahn Park could be adapted for use although the topography is somewhat rolling by nature. However, this could be utilized, with access off of Nicols Road on an old dirt road. If the council so directs the department could proceed with the de- velopment of a garden program. I would suggest that the program be such that a "permit" be required for a garden area which would be staked by the City. In addition, the permit would seek to identify certain responsibili- ties of those using the plot while limiting the responsibility of the City for its care and protection. Such conditions would be the parties would be responsible for keeping the area neat and clean, providing their own water, and prohibiting the use of chemical herbicides, or the planting of illegal substances etc., etc. Further, the City would indicate that it was not responsible for policing of the garden area or for vandalism that might occur, or for clean up of the area etc. What the council may wish to de- termine is whether a fee might be charged for this service and whether the City should prepare the entire garden area for planting by doing the initial tilling/plowing of the area. In terms of what other communities are charging, fees generally range from $7.00 to $10.00 with the plot ranging in size from approximately 20' x 30' to 15' x 201. Please advise at the earliest opportunity on how the council may wish to proceed. A program format outline could be prepared with greater detail for review, or given sufficient direction, the department could proceed at once instituting the program. IA 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Three 9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D. Public Works Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Public Works Department at this time. 0 � There are a total of fourteen (14) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PROJECT 264B A. Project 264B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Twinview Manor Streets) -- Construction has been completed, final payment made to the contractor and all costs associated with this improvement have been tabulated and the final assessment roll has been prepared. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 264B (Twin View Manor Streets) and order the public hearing to be held on May 18, 1982. PROJECT 284B B. Project 284B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 1st Addition Streets) -- All construction has been com- pleted, final payment made to the contractor and all costs associa- ted with this constuction have been tabulated and the final assess- ment roll has been prepared. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 284B (Windtree 1st Addition Streets) and order the final assessment hearing to be held on May 18, 1982. PROJECT 293B C. Project 293B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Windcrest 1st Addition Streets) -- Construction has been completed for this project, final contract payments have been made and all costs associated with this project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll has been completed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 293B (Windcrest 1st Addition Streets) and order the final assessment hearing to be held on May 18, 1982. a 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Four. D. Project 308B, Receive (Duckwood Trails Streets) final payments made to with this project have rolls have been prepared. 0 PROJECT 308B Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing All construction has been completed, the contractor and all costs associated been tabulated and the final assessment ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 308B (Duckwood Trails Streets) and order the final assessment hearing to be held May 18, 1982. CONTRACT 80-28 - FINAL PAYMENT E. Contract 80-28, Approve Final Payment/Accept Project (Sanitary Sewer T.B.) -- Contract 80-28 provided for the internal televising of the sanitary sewer lines that were constructed during 1980 and 1981 in addition to sanitary sewer lines within the Cedar Grove 1st Addition. The City has received a request for final payment from the contractor through our consulting engineering firm along with a certification of compliance to City approved plans and speci- fications. The final report has been reviewed by the City public works personnel and found to be acceptable, and subsequently final payment to the contractor is recommended. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the fourth and final payment to Professional Services Group, Inc., in the amount of $814.87 for Contract 80-28. GRADING PERMIT - CLEARVIEW 3RD F. Approve Grading Permit, Clearview 3rd Addition (Joe Peterson) The City has received an application for a grading permit from Mr. Joe Peterson for the proposed Clearview 3rd Addition which consists of Lot 6, Block 1, Clearview 1st Addition adjacent to Beecher Drive and Clover Lane. The grading permit has been approved, insurance certificates and bonds have been submitted and the appro- priate fee has been paid. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the grading permit for Clearview 3rd Addition (Joe Peterson). R-1 0 • Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Five - GRADING PERMIT - MARV EGGLTM G. Approve Grading Permit, Parcel 10-00200-030-32 (Mary Eggum) The City has received an application for a grading permit from Mary Eggum to fill the existing vacant lot located on the north side of Blue Gentian Road immediately west of the first house on Blue Gentian Road off of T. H. 55. The grading permit has been submitted, reviewed and approved by staff. All insurance certifi- cates, fees and performance bonds have been submitted, reviewed and approved by staff. This property owner intends to place approximately 19,000 c.y. of the excess fill generated from the 494-35E interchange project, the bid letting of which is scheduled for April 23. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the grading permit for Parcel 10-00200-030-32 as requested by Mr. Mary Eggum. GRADING PERMIT - MARV EGGLTM H. Approve Grading Permit, Parcel 10-00200-020-30 (Mary Eggum) The City has received an application for a grading permit from Mr. Mary Eggum for the above referenced parcel which is located on the north side of T. H. 55 across from J. I. Case Company. Mr. Eggum is proposing to place approximately 40,000 c.y. of excess material generated from the 494-35E interchange project proposed to be let by MnDOT on April 23. The grading plan has been submit- ted, reviewed and approved by staff. All required insurance certi- ficates, performance bonds and fees have been submitted, reviewed and approved by staff. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the grading permit for Parcel 10-00200-020-30 as submitted by Mr. Mary Eggum. 7 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Six. CONTRACT 81-5 I. Contract 81-5, Change Order #2 (Univac Trunk Water Main) -- The Public Works Director has reviewed with Bob Rosene, Consulting Engineer, the future trunk water main distribution requirements through the Univac property associated with future well sites. This was done in anticipation of the existing semi -conductor faci- lity construction presently being erected on the Univac property. Due to the planned future location of various future wells, there will be a requirement for a trunk water main crossing and several locations of proposed access roads to this semi -conductor facility. Therefore, it is most economical and feasible to provide these water main crossings prior to this roadway construction to minimize future expensive restoration costs and access problems to this semi -conductor facility. Therefore, it has been determined that the most economical way this could be accomplished would be to add this work to the existing contract that is presently providing for the installation of sanitary sewer and water main facilities to this Univac semi -conductor facility. It is estimated that this additional work will amount to an addition of approximately (this is under negotiation) $15,OOO.to the contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve Change Order #2 to Contract 81-5 to Barbarossa & Sons, Inc., in the amount of approximately $15,000. (The correct figure will be given Monday.) MnCOST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT #60845 J. MnDot Cost Participation Agreement #60845, Project 302 (I-494 Phase Two Trunk Storm Sewer Construction) -- On April 6, 1982, the City Council formally approved plans and specifications for phase two construction of I-494 and its related trunk storm sewer facility which provides for the easterly extension of I-494 from T. H. 45 to approximately 0.35 miles west of T. H. 149. This project provides for the excavation and construction of the major interchange of I-494 and I -35E. It also provides for trunk storm sewer construction which will ultimately provide for the gravity outlet for O'Neill Pond (FP -1). Because a portion of this trunk storm sewer construction provides for the drainage outlet for the City of Eagan, a cost participation agreement must be executed between MnDOT and the City of Eagan providing for the City's finan- cial share of these construction costs. Because of an increase in federal interstate participation in the storm sewer construction, the City's originally estimated share of this phase two trunk storm sewer cost has been reduced from $138,000 to approximately $78,000. This agreement has been reviewed in detail by the Public Works Director and found to be in conformance with past standards and agreements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve MnDOT cost participation agreement #60845 for the phase two trunk storm sewer and outlet for Project 302. V111 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Seven 911 GRANT AGREEMENT K. Execution of 911 Grant Agreement -- Approximately two (2) months ago, the City Council reviewed the intent of Dakota County to fund the 911 emergency telephone system for the cities in Dakota County. This item was approved by the Dakota County Board and a resolution passed December 22, 1981. The grant to be received by the City of Eagan from Dakota County is estimated at $22,367. The formalized grant agreement has been received and is in order for execution by the City Clerk and Mayor. The grant will be in the amount of $22,367. A copy of the grant agreement is enclosed on pages ID through _ 1 for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve final execution of the 911 grant in the amount of $22,367 for the 911 emergency telephone system as awarded by Dakota County. 0 E 0 GRANT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners, hereinafter the Board, and the City of _ Eagan hereinafter the City, are desirous of establishing 911 Emergency, Telephone Service within the municipality, and WHEREAS, the Board by Resolution 01-718, adopted December 22, 1981, has authorized the grant of $ 22.367 to the City to reimburse the City for the expense of establishing a Public Safety Answering Point, hereinafter PSAP, within the 911 system, and WHEREAS, the City is willing to establish, maintain, and operate the PSAP within the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board and the City do mutually agree as follows: 1. The Board will reimburse the City $ 22,367 for the expense of establishing the PSAP to be operated within the City, such reimbursement to be made in January, 1983. 2. The City will establish, maintain and operate the PSAP for the City within the countywide 911 system. 3. The City will assume the expense of purchasing the power supply unit for the operation of its PSAP and will so pur- chase the unit. 4. The Board shall be entitled to receipt of the 208 I reimbursement from the U.S. Department of Transportation for installation of the 911 system. 5. The City will hold harmless and defend the Board and Dakota County from any claims arising through the establishment, installation, operation, or maintenance of the PSAP - 911 system within the City. 6. The City agrees to comply with all laws and regulations, both federal and state, relating to the expenditure I of these funds, including but not limited to those laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sex, or handicap. Page 1 of 2 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed. Approved as to form: form: COUNTY OF DAKOTA Assistant County gttorney/Date By Approved as to execution: Gene Atkins Cha man Board of Comc Commissioners Assistant County Attorney/Date Date of Signature Attest Approved by Dakota County Board Carl D. Onischuk, Auditor Resolution No. 81-718. Date of Signature This instrument drafted by: DMF CITY OF Dakota County Attorney's Office Dakota County Government Center By Hastings, Minnesota 55033 Title Telephone: (612) 437-0438 Date of Signature Attest Title Date of Signature C-82-14 page 2 of 2 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Eight EXCESS PROPERTY DETERMINATION L. Determination of Excess Property -- The Director of Finance is requesting that the City declare eight (8) items of equipment as excess property and authorize the sale of this property at the Police Auction scheduled for May 22, 1982. Presently, this equip- ment is being stored in the basement of the Police Department and is of no value or use to our local government operations. For a copy of the list which is recommended as surplus City property, refer to page 13 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the sale of surplus City property as determined by the Director of Finance. Ix E MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR VAN OVERBEKE DATE: APRIL 13, 1982 SUBJECT: SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY n The following equipment is currently being stored in the basement of the Police building and has not been used recently in City operations: 1 — Adler Typewriter (Universal 20) 1 — Burroughs Calculator (C4300) 2 — Underwood Olivetti Calculators 1 — Olivetti Calculator 1 — Scriptomatic Addressing Machine 1 — A.B. Dick Mimeograph (Model 418) 1 — Set Realistic Wireless Intercoms I would like the City Council to declare it to be surplus property and authorize its being sold with the Police Department unclaimed property on Saturday, May 22, 1982. As near as I can tell, this equipment is of no value to the City. Yl t -WL Direct of Finance 13 0 6 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Nine. AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS M. Amusement Device Renewals -- The 1982 Amusement Device Renewals are in order for consideration. Enclosed on page/ is a list of businesses and the number of machines for considerate . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER ment divice renewals. /4 To approve the 1982 amuse - 0 0 1982 AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS BUSINESS NUMBER OF MACHINES Amore Pizza 5 Deli 3 machines (New owner will be Carbones) 1665 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan MN 55121 Cedarvale Shopping Center 5 machines National Amusement Co 3541 Glenhurst St Louis Park MN 55416 Cedarvale Lanes over 15 machines 3883 Beau d'Rue Drive Eagan MN 55122 Eagandale Club 3 machines 3330 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55121 LaFonda 3 machines 3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan MN 55122 Mr D's Pizza 2 machines 3904 Beau d'Rue Drive Eagan MN 55122 Nicols Landing over 15 machines 3998 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan MN 55122 Pizza Hut 2 machines 3992 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan MN 55122 Southfork 3 machines 4185 So Robert Trail Eagan MN 55123 Starks Halfway over 15 machines 3125 Dodd Road Eagan MN 55121 15 Council - Data 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Ten 1982 TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS N. Trailer Permit Renewals -- The 1982 trailer permit renewal list is enlcosed on page 17 for your review. Chief Building Inspector Peterson has and- all trailers to determine if they are in order for renewal. The City Administrator will provide a report to the City Council during discussion of Consent Items if there are any trailer permits that should not be renewed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the 1982 trailer permit renewals. IG 1982 TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS Name & Address Tripp Oil 3085 Hwy 13 Eagan MN 55121 Sharon Staff 1430 Rocky Lane Eagan 24N 55123 Earl Marotzke 535 Gun Club Road Rosemount MN 55068 Wilfred Heuer 3340 Dodd Road Eagan MN 55121 G Wm Smith 3587 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Alwin & Lyle Schultz 1315 Carriage Hills Drive Eagan MN 55121 Edmund Schwanz 810 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan MN 55123 Levi Heuer 1585 Deerwood Drive Eagan MN 55122 Dakota Homes Doug Isaacson 3660 Dodd Rd Eagan MN 55123 Council - Date 0 Number & Explanation 2 office use 3 care of mother 9 family home 12 trailer for son 17 sons home fince the 60's 20 ' family home 22 mothers home 37 Geo Miesters home 41 office use 17 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Eleven `PUBLIG 'HEAR'INCS! PROJECT 323A 0 A. Project 323A, Final Assessment Hearing (Coachman Land Company First Addition - Utilities) -- On March 16, 1982, the final assess- ment roll for the above referenced project was presented to the City Council and the final assessment hearing subsequently scheduled for April 20. Enclosed on page �r is a final assessment hearing tabulation relating to cost per unit for the individual utility improvements that were installed as they compare to the rates quoted in the feasibility report at the time of the public hearing. The final assessment rates result in a $126 per unit overrun (6.5%) from those rates quoted at the time of the public hearing. This is a direct result of a request received from the developer per- taining to the extension of the sewer and water services beyond the right of way to a point located ten feet from each individual quadrominium unit. All proposed final assessment costs associated with this project have been forwarded to the developer for his review and comments. To date, no objections have been received by staff. All legal notices have been sent to all affected property owners and published in the legal newspaper. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To close the public hearing and approve, modify or deny the final assessment roll as presented and direct the staff to certify the roll to the County Auditor for collection. IQ FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 323 A SUBDIVISION/AREA: Coachman Land Co. 1st Addition FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: 4-20-82 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES 0 Area Lx� Laterals QService M Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM ri Area Fx Laterals $457.46 $ 540.00 411.11 114.50 296.32 388.00 -SANITARY ❑ Area x❑ Laterals xx Service E] Lat. Benefit/Trunk STREETS IJ Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $ 332.38 $ 595.00 411.10 114.50 173.26 203.00 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 28 Units and 2 Outlots (52 Unit Equiv.) NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 Years RATE OF INTEREST: 12.5% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $166,531.47 (80 Units at $2,081.63 each) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 81-7 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 4-7-81 K 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twelve PROJECT 336A 40 B. Project 336A, Final Assessment Hearing (Tomark 1st Addition - Utilities) -- Tomark 1st Addition consists of two lots, each one containing a multi -unit condominium complex. Enclosed on page J\ is a final assessment summary information sheet indicating tT�inal assessment rates associated with the individual utilities as compared to the rates quoted in the feasibility report at the time of public hearing. The final assessment figures are $2.,032.67 per lot (2.67) less than those rates quoted in the feasibility report at the public hearing. Final assessment figures have been forwarded to the developer prior to the final assessment hearing, and, to date, no objections have been received by staff. All legal notices have been sent to affected property owners and published in the legal newspapers. This final assessment roll was presented to the City Council on March 16 with the final assessment hearing scheduled for April 20. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To close the public hearing and approve, modify or deny the assessment roll as presented and direct the staff to certify the roll to the County Auditor for collection. IN 0 0 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 336A SUBDIVISION/AREA: TOMARK IST ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: 4-20-82 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES OArea E0 Laterals $16,781.21- $19,140.00 Service (Avg.) Lat. Benefit/Trunk $6,247.42 $5,740.00 STORM (Avg.) Q Area $10,896.36 $10,894.63 ® Laterals $13,087.75 $15,335.00 STREETS Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. $2,831.68 $3,090.00 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 2 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 Years RATE OF INTEREST: 12.5% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $153,863.91 (2 lots at $76,936.96 each) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 6-16-81 a. 81-7 FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES Area Laterals $20,866.90 $19,050.A0 ❑ Service (Avg.) 0 Lat. Benefit/Trunk $6,225.65 $5,720.00 STREETS Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. $2,831.68 $3,090.00 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 2 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 Years RATE OF INTEREST: 12.5% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $153,863.91 (2 lots at $76,936.96 each) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 6-16-81 a. 81-7 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Thirteen OLD BOS'INESS' PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LEXINGTON PLACE A. C. S. Homes Corporation for Preliminary Plat (Lexington Place) Consisting of Approximately 84.62 Acres -- An application was re- ceived for a preliminary plat entitled Lexington Place consisting of approximately 84.62 acres and containing 28 condominium units for a total of 672 dwelling units. The APC held a public hearing on February 25, 1982 and is recommending approval of the preliminary plat subject to conditions as outlined in the minutes and staff report. The City Council reviewed the recommendation of the Advi- sory Planning Commission at the March 16, 1982 meeting. There were a number of questions raised by members of the City Council that required additional information to be prepared by City staff. Those questions are addressed in a memorandum prepared by the City Administrator to the City Planner found on pages 2, 3 through a,ar . The City Planner has prepared a lengthy report, spending a great deal of time discussing the questions and pursuing answers to the questions with several suburban communities as well as state and metropolitan agencies. Because the nature of the questions require in many cases attitudes and positions of employees who work for neighboring cities or state and metropolitan agencies, it was a difficult exercise for the City Planner to gather the and write the data so it does not appear to be a position of the City staff. Please regard this memorandum as fact finding. It is not intended to be pursuasive. For a copy of the report which was prepared by the City Planner, refer to pages 0157 through Also, a copy of the APC minutes for the Fe rub ary 25, 1982 Zt ng are enclosed on pages -31 through 6r For additional information on this item, please refer to the amity Planner's report, a copy of which was enclosed on pages 46 through 59 in the March 16, 1982 packet. Also, a letter from Tie City Attorney's office was enclosed on page 60 and a copy of the Advisory Park & Recreation Committee recommendations was enclosed on page 64. If any member of the City Council desires new copies of any of this information, please contact the City Administrator's office and this infor- mation will be included with the administrative packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the preliminaryplat for Lexington Place as recommended for approval by the APC. 1�, 0 • MEMO TO: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE FROM: .CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 24, 1982 SUBJECT: PROPOSED LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION/CITY COUNCIL ACTION OF 3-16-82 At the City Council meeting of 3-16-82, the preliminary plat pro- posed as "Lexington Place Addition" was continued until the April 20, 1982 City Council meeting. The following is a copy of the motion: "I move that the application for preliminary plat approval of Lexington Place Addition be continued until the April 20, 1982, City Council meeting to allow the City staff, at the direction of the City Administrator, an opportunity to review the impact and the effect on the welfare and safety of the present and future Eagan residents including those that would occupy smaller than normal sized residential condominium units including a recommenda- tion as to whether such units should be permitted and encouraged for development in the City.', The City Council is also requesting that the following information be evaluated and reviewed and that a report be prepared for Council review at the April 20 meeting. 1. Review the U. S. Homes developments in Apple Valley and Bloomington. How did those cities address the mini -condo units? What is the history of the rezoning in Bloomington that allowed U. S. Homes Corporation to construct the condominium project? What were the conditions and stipulations, if any? What are the trends for affordable housing? Examine local real estate, metropolitan council, lending institutions and other agencies. 4. Can by-laws or development agreements restrict the number of studio units allowed for rental? Example might be 20 percent. 5. Are there studio units of comparable size suburban areas or central cities? What unit? Are these units owner occupied, and centage? 23 located in the is the cost per if so, what per - 0 . Lexington Place Memo March 24, 1982 Page Two 6. Can units described in #5 above be toured by City officials? 7. Is it possible to loop the fish hook cul de sac as illus- trated on the south side of the proposed plat of Lexington Place Addition? 8. Other applicable information. I would like this report presented to my office in final draft by Thursday, April 15, 1982. Please solicit the assistance of Liz and Dave for this project. l -Z ity Administrato cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney �i TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: APRIL 15, 1982 RE: RESPONSE TO OUESTIONS IN MEMO DATED I i• •,* • • 019 QUESTION 1 - Review the U. S. Homes developments in Apple Valley and Bloomington. How did those cities address the mini -condo units? Staff has contacted the Apple Valley Planning Department, and they have in- formed us that Orrin Thampson has made a submittal in Apple Valley which is part of an overall planned development. The original proposal was for two 70 -unit ondominium buildings. Since the original concept was submitted, the applicant, Orrin Thcmmpson, has revised that concept to the 24 -unit build- ings which are the same as being proposed in the City of Eagan. At the pre- sent time, the Apple Valley Planning Cannission has approved tyro 24 -unit buildings with a mix of 6 efficiencies, 7 one-bedroan and 11 two-bedroan units. This item will be scheduled on an April Apple Valley City Council meeting as a consent item on the agenda for approval. In discussing the total site with Apple Valley, it appears that the site is smaller in size and there may be a maximum of 90-100 dwelling units for the overall condo- minium project. In discussing the mix of efficiencies, one and two bedroan units with Apple Valley, it appears that Apple Valley supports the smaller sized efficiency and one -bedroom units. It has been determined that the smaller units will lessen the services that are required in the community such as the number of children that would be generated in the project for schools and police, because the number of people is less than what a pro- ject would be if there would be more two and three bedroom units. It is staff's understanding that the City of Apple Valley encourages the smaller unit vs. the two and three bedroom units because of services and demands that the smaller units place on the city. In discussing the Bloomington condominium project, it is staff's under- standing that Bloanxigton has approved a ondominium project, but there are no efficiency units. The entire condominium project in Bloomington consists of 1 and. 2 bedrooms. Therefore, Bloomington has not had any de- velopment proposals with efficiency, or mini -condominium, units. QUESTION 2 - 4dzat is the history of the rezoning in Bloomington that al- lowed U. S. Hames Corporation to construct the condoninium project? Mat were the conditions and stipulations, if any? It is staff's understanding according to the City of Bloomington that Orrin Thompson, or U. S. Homes, submitted an application for preliminary plat approval in 1977. In 1977, the City of Bloomington approved the develop- ment to consist of single family homes and preserved acreage for multiple or condominium units. The single family hares have been constructed since 1977. In late 1980, early 1981, Orrin Thomason submitted the site plans for the condominium project. At that time, there were concerns from the as Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Addition Page two surrounding neighborhood of which Orrin Thompson had constructed the single family hones. The oondmAniun project took approximately 10 weeks to be approved by the City of Bloomington once Orrin Thompson had submitted plans for the condominium units. The condominium project consisted of 72 unit buildings with underground parking. The mix of the units were 1 and 2 bed- room units. There were no efficiencies proposed in this development. In discussing the studio, or mini -condominium unit, with the Bloomington staff, they have stated that Bloomington presently has an ordinance which requires minimun square footages for the type of dwelling unit. There is a provi- sion in the Bloomington ordinance for efficiency units of having a minimum of 400 square feet. A one -bedroom unit must contain a minimum of 650 square feet, a two-bedroom unit a mininmmt of 800 square feet and a three-bedroom unit containing a minimum of 950 square feet. In inquiring has Bloomington :! wouldlook at the efficiency, or mini -condo, it is speculation at this time because no efficiencies, or mini -condos were proposed with the Orrin Thoupr son development. In theorizing with the Bloomington staff, it appears the surrounding citizens have the same concerns as in Fagan. QUESTION 3 - What are the trends for afforable housing? Pyramine local real estate, metropolitan council, lending institutions and other agencies. Before staff tries to present trends from different organizations that have been listed in the question, staff requests that the Council first evaluate the trends which have been occurring the City of Fagan, or at least from 1977. In the middle of 1977 through 1979, the majority of the platting which had occurred in Eagan was mainly single family development proposals. The closer we get to 1979, the smaller the lots became in development pro- posals. However, the majority of the plats were single family. In 1980, there had been a change from single family to quadraminium and townhouse lots which consisted of most of the development activity with maybe one or two condominium projects proposed and fewer and fewer single family lots being proposed. In 1981, the developments consisted primarily of quadra- minium and condominium development proposals. And, in 1982, primarily townhouse and condominium developments, with the exception of one develop- ment proposal which still had small single family lots, were proposed. In looking at the trends, staff feels Eagan is the best place to look as to what has occurred with development proposals. Staff has contacted Glasrud Development Co. who is one of the larger condo- miniun builders in the metropolitan area. In 1979, Glasrud Development Co. had constructed a major project in downtown Minneapolis. The project con- sisted of condominium units consisting of 1 and 2 bedroom unit, and the majority of that development was 2 -bedroom units. In the last year, Glas- rud Development Co. constructed a project called "Citywalk" in downtown St. Paul. The project consisted mostly of 1 -bedroom units with some condo- minium units of 550-600 square feet. As the years have gone by, the units have been getting smaller and smaller according to Mr. Steve Holland, who is one of the Vice Presidents of Glasrud Development Co. At the present time, it is staff's understandingthat they are not involved in any new .16 0 • Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Iexington Place Addition Page three proposals for condominium units. However, if they were proposing a pro- ject, it is staff's understanding that the units would be smaller than the two projects listed above. Staff has also contacted HUD, Housing and Urban Development, in Minnesota. It is the staff's understanding that a few years ago, HUD would not subsi- dize any efficiency units. In the past few years, HUD has changed their standards and is realistically trying to look at the market and what mar- ket rate housing is at the present time. In multiple dwellings, HUD has established maxinnnn square footage for efficiency, one -bedroom, two-bedroom, three-bedroom and four-bedroom dwelling units and will not subsidize any- thing over these square footage requirements. The current maximum square footage requirement on efficiency units is 415 square feet, 540 square foot maximum for a one -bedroom unit, 800 square foot maximuu for a two- bedroom unit, 1,050 square foot maximum for a three-bedroom unit and 1,150 square foot maximum for a four-bedroom unit. In trying to determine what constitutes the health, safety requirements for an individual for living space, HUD has indicated that there is really no minimum square footage which determines the health, safety requirement for an individual dwell- ing unit. HUD has established a tern called furnishable design which means that instead of a minimum square footage requirement, HUD will look at the design of the unit in regard to pertinent furniture, appliances, beds, etc. to see if the unit appears to be liveable and has enough square footage around these furnishings to make it liveable. In reviewing efficiency units in accordance with the UBC, the Uniform Building Code, which is presently adopted in the City of Eagan as minimum square footage requirements, in efficiency units, the minimum square foot- age allowed for these units is 220 square feet superficial floor area, which means all floor area excluding closet and a bathroom. So, if one looks at 220 square feet as the minimum for living and dining and kitchen and adds square footage for a closet and a bathroom, an efficiency unit could meet the State Building Code at approximately 270-280 square feet, satisfying all requirements of the State Building Code. The State Building Code also addresses that for more than two persons, there shall be 100 square feet of additional floor area for each person in excess of two people. So, according to the present code, the efficiency units pro- posed could house a maxim= of four people according to square footage requirements in the State Building Code. Staff has also contacted the Housing Department of the Metropolitan Coun- cil. The Metropolitan Council staff has indicated that in the past years, the units are becoming smaller. They have also indicated that there are some smaller condominium units being processed by the A-95 review. How- ever, these units are elderly complexes, and would not be under the same criteria as a market rate condominium project. At the present time, there is no market rate for sale of condominium units that they know of that contain efficiency units. There are condominium units, however, being processed through the A-95 review which consist of one and two bedroom dwelling units. a-7 Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Addition Page four The staff does expect units to become smaller to meet the demand of the market. In discussing condominium units with surrounding suburbs, there are condo- miniun projects being proposed with efficiency units. Two development proposals located by staff are as follows: 1) There is a development proposal in Edina which is called Edinborough consisting of office buildings and condominium dwelling units. The condominium project will consist of approximately 600 dwelling units and there will be in excess of 10% of the units being efficiency or mini-condeninium units. 2) The second development is located in Woodbury which is called Alder - wood. The developer will be proposing 72 condeninium units where 20% of the units will be efficiency. Presently, the developer has a 24 -unit building up and there are models available for review. The last item staff discussed with the Metropolitan Council is in regard to how many communities in the Metropolitan area have square footage require- ments in their ordinances. The Metropolitan staff has indicated that approx- imately 208 of the metropolitan oommmnities have square footage requirements, 80% do not. The Metropolitan Council staff indicated that Policy 39, the criteria set up to review housing standards and also one of the criterion the Metropolitan Council uses in grant applications for Lawton and other grants, states that communities with square footage requirements lose points in the Policy 39 review. Tb summarize cements from the different agencies mentioned above, one common element always came forth; in regard to the cost and financing of the individual units that are under construction, the cost of financing has became so expensive that the affordability of single family homes and large units has diminished substantially. It is not that people looking for housing units do not want single family hones or large units; it's a simple factor that the cost of these units have become so expensive that the people cannot afford to purchase the larger units any longer. If financing, or money, became available or cheaper, there would be lar- ger units constructed. However, persons that staff talked to in'research- ing statistics for this report spoke favorably of cheaper money or better financing becoming available within the near future. The last item staff would like to bring to the attention of the City Coun- cil is the housing plan which this City had prepared in August of 1979 and adopted by the City Council. The housing plan indicates that the City of Eagan has adopted a 1980 to 1990 goal of developing 1,474 new modest cost market rate dwelling units. The term "market rate" placed a value range from $40,000-$60,000 per dwelling unit. The City has indicated that they would develop approximately 147 modest cost units per year for the next 10 years. In going through this housing plan, there are a number of things which may be outdated even from 1979. Orae item could be income M 0 0 Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Page five limits which statistics were taken from November, 1978 and also, the cost of modest cost housing based from 1979. The last item in regard to the housing plan staff would like to point out is Table 12 on Page 24 which identifies numbers of units per neighbor- hood. According to this exhibit, it indicates that neighborhood 14 should have approximately 50 modest cost units. The development, Lexington Place, would provide more units than what is projected by this housing plan. The other neighborhoods should also be looked at such as 29, 30 and 33 where the City has indicated 200 potential modest cost units and is it reason- able to place this many units in the projected neighborhood as listed in this chart? In reviewing the housing plan, staff has received additional statistical data regarding population and households frau the 1980 census. There are a number of categories that should be looked at to determine the marketability and the type of population that existed in Eagan in 1980. Staff could prepare an analysis of this statistical data to support many condos or efficiency units. There is also information that could be used to support other types of dwelling units. Some of the interesting factors for general information are: Number 2 - Count of Families - 5,231 Numbers 33 and 34 - Median Number of Persons per occupied housing unit and the Mean Number of persons per occupied housing unit Number 4 - Count of housing units of 7,206 for a total number of 41 non -condominium housing units by occupancy status, owner - occupied - 3,961 dwelling units, vacant for sale - 115. Number 26 - Occupied Housing Units by Tenure, owner occupied - 4,399 dwelling units, Renter occupied - 2,425 Number 38 - Value of Owner Occupied Noncondominiumu Housing Units by Price - staff would just like to note that there are 221 dwelling units in the City of Eagan that are an estimated value of $49,999 or less. The median caner -occupied house is listed at $70,900. Number 43 - Contract Rent of Renter -Occupied Units - the rent struc- tures and the number of renters in the structure, the median rent in rental units for the City is $291. In trying to determine a market for smaller, or mini -condominium units, it is interesting to look at the Number 33 - Occupied Housing Units by Number of Persons and Tenure - presently there are 1,561 one or two person fami- lies presently renting structures in the City of Eagan. 'L 9 Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Addition Page six Staff has included this two-page summary of the housing statistics which have been provided by the Minnesota Analysis and Planning Systems. These two pages have been enclosed for your review and hopefully you can conduct your own analysis of the housing statistics for the City of Eagan. QUESTIM 4 - Can by-laws or development agreements restrict the number of studio units allowed for rental? Example might be 20%. Staff has reviewed this question with the City Attorney. He has indicated that you can in almost all cases restrict or provide any conditions in development agreements that are agreeable by both parties. In reviewing the housing plan in regard to the number of modest cost housing provided by section, there may be some agreement worked out between the developer and the City. However, placing a percentage of studio units allowed per development may be challenged. Presently, the City of Eagan does not have an ordinance or criteria pertaining to the zoning ordinance which reflects limiting the number of studio or condominium units in a develop- ment proposal. It is not to say that the City cannot establish criteria in accordance with the housing plan and other criteria to come up with a Percentage that could be a number worked from the statistics and amend the zoning ordinance to require a certain percentage of the units could be studio or mini-condcminium units. This could be done by determining the percentage of market rate housing units established on Table 12, Page 24 and find out what the percentage is of the total number of dwelling units for that particular section. Staff would request that the City Attorney research the legality of providing a certain percentage by amend- ment to determine legally whether this language can be included in the zoning ordinance, or would it be considered exclusionary by restricting the number of one kind of dwellingunit in a certain or district. development proposal QUESTION 5 - Are there studio units of comparable size located in the sub- urban areas of central cities? What is the cost per unit? Are these units owner occupied, and if so, what percentage? In reviewing studio or mini -condo units with the surrounding communities, there are a number of studio or mini-oondo and efficiency units which have been constructed in the past as rental projects. The cities I have talked to do not have numbers on has many studio units are available in their com- munities. They also do not know haw many units have been converted to con- dominium and sold for owner -occupied units. There is no number staff can cane up with at this tine as to the number of units and percentages of ef- ficiency units which are rented or owner -occupied. As stated earlier in this report, there have been very few projects where efficiency, or mini- amdos, have been proposed in the metropolitan area. In this report, staff has been able to locate two projects - one which is under construction - the other still in the planning stage. In discussing studios, or efficien- cy units with other planners in other communities, there have been inquir- ies regarding the efficiency units, but not too many have been constructed at this time. 0 Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Addition Page seven 0 QUESTION 6 - Can units described in #5 above be toured by City officials? Staff has contacted the City of Woodbury, Dwight Picha, Community Development Director for Woodbury, and he has indicated that he would be available Fri- day, April 16, 1982 at 1:00 at the Woodbury City Hall to take any represen- tatives from Eagan on a tour of Aldenwood Condominiums. If any of the marc bers who cannot make the tour on Friday at 1:00, the sales office is open on Saturday and their hours are from Noon to 6:00. You may want to call Alder - wood Condominiums, 738-7777 to make sure there is a sales person at the con- dominium units. Staff has also enclosed a brochure of Aldeswood Condominiums describing the two different efficiency units and also a site location map of where Alderwood Condominiums are located. QUESTION 7 - Is it possible to loop the fish hook cul de sac as illustrated on the south side of the proposed plat of Lexington Place Addi- tion? Staff has reviewed this request with the applicant, and the applicant has in- dicated that physically the loop street could be provided. However, looking at the topography, it is determined a substantial amount of grading would have to be completed and some trees would be lost if this street would turn in to a loop street system. The applicant has looked at alternatives by pro- viding turnaround areas in two different areas to provide for traffic circu- lation vs. running the loop street in this proposed area. The applicant will provide sketches at the April 20th meeting showing the physical constraints incurred by looping the street back to the public right-of-way. QUESTION 8 - Other applicable information. The last item staff would like to address is in regard to cost of a unit at today's financing and what the debt -free income is for an individual's financing qualifications, not in particular this dwelling unit, but for any dwelling unit that costs in the range of $33,000-$50,000. The chart below will list the mortgage amount, what the monthly payment is, what the yearly payment is and what the qualifying income will have to be. This chart has been set up on a 30 -year mortgage at 15-,8. Obviously, there are many different creative financing techniques on the market today. However, this information is intended to give the Council an idea of the interest amount and what the cost of money has done to the type of unit a person with an income can purchase. 30 -YEAR MORTGAGE PIAN AT 15'x% INTEREST MORTGAGE MTHLY PAYMENT TAXES,INSURANCEASSOC.FEES YR TOTAL QUALIFY.INCQ� $33,000 $443.54 $100.00 $6,522.48 $21,198.06 35,000 456.59 100.00 6,679.08 21,707.01 40,000 521.86 100.00 7,462.32 24,252.54 45,000 587.04 100.00 8,244.48 26,794.56 50,000 652.26 100.00 9,027.12 29,338.14 11 Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Addition Page eight As you can see, qualifying incomes on any type of purchase has increased where it is difficult for single individuals, or couples just starting out, to quali- fy for owner -occupied housing in this market at today's current interest rates. In reviewing the Lexington Place proposal, the applicant has indicated that the units will be owner -occupied. The present zoning of this site would al- low for owner -occupied or for rental units. Owner -occupied dwelling units with a homeowner's association taking care of the maintenance and the upkeep of the buildings is a much better situation than having the proposed complex being an all rental project. The owner -occupied homeowner's association de- velopments do have a good track record in the City of Eagan in regard to landscaping, maintenance and upkeep of the individual units. Staff can refer to different rental projects in the City where the upkeep has not been as good as the owner-ocoupied units with a homeowner's association. In determining the land values, or property values within the area, it is staff's understanding that the awner-occupied homeowner's association would tend to keep the property values higher than if it would be a rental project. In determining the mix of the project by looking at the individual units from the outside, it would be impossible to tell if the units within the building are small or large units. However, the upkeep of the building and the mainte- nance of the exterior is a much more visible indicator as to what the -proper- ty value of the individual project would be. Hopefully, staff has addressed the concerns presented by the City Administra- tor for review. If staff has not addressed any particular item, or if any- one would like additional information on a particular item, please feel free to contact me at the Eagan City Hall. DCR/jack 3a 1980 CENSUS DATA (SUMMARY TAPE FILE 1) MINNESOTA ANALYSIS AND PLANNING SYSTEMS :_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________. PAGE 1 OF 2 : POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ITEMS :SUMMARY _ CODE AND ______________________________ TYPE: 27(PLACE) 1063 AREA NAME: EAGAN CITY 1 COUNT OF --------------------------- 6 PERSONS BY -_______________________ 11 MEDIAN AGE OF 2 COUNT ____________________________-___: OF ; 34 MEDIAN NUMBER OF PERSONS PER ALL PERSONS ' GENDER PERSONS BY FAMILIES • OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT TOTAL20700 : GENDER ;__________________________________________________________. 5231 2.68 URBAN 20700 : TOTAL 29.9 : 3 COUNT OF 35 MEAN NUMBER OF PERSONS PER URBAN FRINGE 0 : FEMALE 10398 : FEMALE 25.9 : HOUSEHOLDS OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT RURAL MALE 10302 : MALE 25.9 : 6824 : 3.02 10 POPULATION BY 7 PERSONS BY 14 PERSONS 15 YEARS AND OVER HOUSEHOLDS BY PERSONS AND TYPE AGE AND GENDER RACE BY MARITAL STATUS ' FEMALE MALE : WHITE 19670 : FEMALE (21) WITH (22) WITH MALE PERSON(S) PERSON(S) UNDER 1 217 207 : BLACK 356 : SINGLE 1814 2063 60 OR OVER 65 OR OVER: • 1-2 421 421 : AM INDIAN. ETC : NOW MARRIED 4589 4590 : 1 PERSON 135 98 3-4 443 417 : INDIAN 79 : SEPARATED 110 . 70 : 2 OR MORE PERSONS: 5 176 236 : ESKIMO O : WIDOWED 228 41 : FAMILY HDUSEHOLD 382 242 ; 6 198 199 : ALEUT 0 : DIVORCED 582 358 : NDNFAMILY HOUSEHOLD 3 0 ' 7-9 612 638 : TOTAL 79 ;------ __-------------------------------- ___________________________________. 10-13 819 860 : ASIAN, PAC ISLANDER 16 HOUSEHOLDS BY PERSONS.TYPE 17 PERSONS UNDER 18 BY HOUSEHOLD 14 189 202 : JAPANESE 33 1 PERSON: TYPE AND RELATIONSHIP 15 1B0 200 CHINESE 34 FEMALE HOUSEHOLDER 563 IN HOUSEHOLD: 18 207 173 : FILIPINO 10 MALE HOUSEHOLDER 619 HOUSEHOLDER OR SPOUSE 7 17 194 196 : KOREAN 63 2 OR MORE PERSONS: CHILD OF HOUSEHOLDER: IB 154 152 : INDIAN 47 MARR. COUPLE FAMILY 4516 IN MARR. COUPLE FAMILY 6210 19 175 168 : VIETNAMESE 46 OTHER FAMILY: IN OTHER FAMILY 961 20 183 184 : HAWAIIAN O FEMALE HOUSEHOLDER 599 OTHER RELATIVE 153 : 21 199 161 : GUAMANIAN 0 MALE HOUSEHOLDER 116 NONRELATIVE 68 . 22-24 592 547 : SAMOAN 0 NONFAMILY HOUSEHOLD: IN GROUP QUARTERS: . 25-29 1272 1103 : TOTAL 233': FEMALE HOUSEHOLDER 153 INMATE 0 : . 30-34 1355 1232 : OTHER 162 MALE HOUSEHOLDER 258 OTHER. g ; . 35-44 1536 1612: ---------------------------------------------------------- _____________------ _------------------------ . 45-54 660 816 : 9 PERSONS OF SPANISH B PERSONS OF SPANISH : . 19 HOUSEHOLDS WITH 18 RELATED CHILDREN 55-59 217 251 : ORIGIN BY RACE ORIGIN BY ETHNICITY : PERSON(S) UNDER 16 BY AGE 60-61 70 58 : BY TYPE : UNDER 5 YRS 2111 : 62-64 79 77 : WHITE 93 : MEXICAN '• 94 MARR. COUPLE FAN 3145 5 TO 17 YRS - 65-74 181 137 BLACK -__5213 5 : PUERTO RICAN 13 OTHER FAMILY: •-------------______: : 75-84 51 49 AM INDIAN. ASIAN OR CUBAN 3 FEMALE HSHLOER 516 24 HOUSEHOLDS WITH • 85+ - 18 PAC ISLANDER i : OTHER SPANISH 36 MALE HSHLDER 72 NONRELATIVES TOTAL :_______________________ 1039 8 _6 10302 ________________________________________________________________________________:___________________-___; OTHER 47 : TOTAL SPANISH 146 NONFAMILY 23 PRESENT 541 ; 12 POPULATION BY AGE AND RACE : POPULATION BY HOUSEHOLD 27 HOUSING UNITS BY 28 SPANISH • : TYPE AND RELATIONSHIP RACE AND TENURE HOUSEHOLDER UNITS UNDER 5 5-17 18-64 65+ : (20).: OWNER RENTER BY RACE AND TENURE : WHITE 1996 5032 12402 440 : (15) PERSONS OCCUPIED OCCUPIED BLACK 46 103 207 O : TOTAL 65+ WHITE 4319 2274 OWNER RENTER : INDIAN 16 1B 45 0 : IN FAMILY HOUSEHOLD: BLACK 29 89 OCCUPIED OCCUPIED: : ASIAN 37 73 121 2 : HOUSEHOLDER 5231 177 INDIAN 8 13 : WHITE 7 9 : : OTHER. 31 53 78 0 : SPOUSE 4516 106 ASIAN 31 27 : BLACK -1 -1 : TOTAL 2126 5279 12853 442 : OTHER RELATIVE 8599 60 OTHER 12 22 : OTHER 13 24 -------------------------------------------. NONRELATIVE 173 0 ;------------ __------------------ _-------- _______: 13 POPULATION OF SPANISH : IN NONFAMILY HOUSEHOLD: 23 HOUSING UNITS WITH PERSON(S) 65+ BY AGE ORIGIN BY AGE AND RACE FEMALE HSHLD 716 80 OF HOUSEHOLDER AND TENURE AGE OF UNDER 5 5-17 18-64 65+ : MALE HSHLD 877 18 HOUSEHOLDER : WHITE 16 41 36 O : NONRELATIVE 511 O UNDER 65 65+ : BLACK -1 -1 -1 -1 : IN GROUP QUARTERS: TOTAL 65 275 : OTHER -1 -1 -1 -1 : INMATE 54 1 OWNER OCCUPIED 59 187 : TOTAL :-------------------------- 23 55 _---------------------- 68 0 OTHER 23 O _---------- _____________________________________________________________________. RENTER OCCUPIED 6 88 1960 CENSUS DATA (SUMMARY TAPE FILE 1) PAGE 2 OF 2 HOUSING ITEMS MINNESOTA ANALYSIS AND PLANNING SYSTEMS :------------------"'---------------------------'"-------------------- SUMMARY CODE AND TYPE: 27(PLACE) 1063 AREA NAME: EAGAN CITY COUNT OF HOUSING UNITS 5 YEAR-ROUND HOUSING _________PEEP-___-___ 41 NONCONDOMiNIUN HOUSING . _______________________PERS______________; 26 OCCUPIED HOUSING 36 PERSONS IN • TOTAL 7206': UNITS BY VACANCY STATUS UNITS BY OCCUPANCY UNITS BY TENURE OCCUPIED HOUSING URBAN 7206 : TOTAL 7205 STATUS UNITS 8Y TENURE URBAN FRINGE RURAL O :"OCCUPIED 6824 OWNER OCCUPIED 3961 - OWNER OCC 4399 : OWNER OCC 15028 ____________________________________________________________________PEEP O : VACANT 381 VACANT FOR SALE 115 RENTER OCC 2425 : RENTER OCC 5595 36 VALUE OF OWNER -OCCUPIED NONCONDOMINIUM 43 CONTRACT RENT OF 40 AVERAGE VALUE OF 29 YEAR-ROUND 30 YEAR-ROUND UNITS HOUSING UNITS RENTER -OCCUPIED NONCONDOMINIUM HOUSING : CONDOMINIUM UNITS BY ROOMS UNITS UNITS BY OCCUPANCY BY TENURE AND 1 38 • LESS THAN 510000 2 LESS THAN i50 3 $50:TO-S99 61 STATUS - VACANCY STATUS 2 184 : : $10000 TO $14999 4 $IGD TO $119 12OWNER OCC 3 671 : 140 $15000 TO $19999 1 $120 TO $139 15 : 4 931 : $20000 TO $24999 6 $140 TO $149 4 : : OWNER OCCUPIED f 77377 : RENTER OCC VACANT/SALE 44 : 5 1353 : 1 : %25000 TO $29999 : $30000 TO 7 $150 TO $159 15 VACANT FOR SALE f 89760 : OTHER VACANT : 6+ 4025 : 6 : MEDIAN 5.60 $34999 15 : S160 TO $169 11 ---------------------------;__________________..___;______________________: : : $35000 TO $39999 : $40000 TO 549999 32 : 154 $170 TO $199 37 42 AVERAGE VALUE OF 25 VACANT YEAR-ROUND 48 OCCUPIED UNITS : %50000 TO $79999 : 2523 : $200 TO $249 373 $250 TO $299 745 CONDOMINIUM HOUSING HOUSING UNITS BY WITH 1.01 OR MORE : $80000 TO $99999 640 : $300 TO $399 850 UNITS BY OCCUPANCY STATUS VACANCY STATUS PERSONS PER ROOM : $100000 TO $149999 498 : $400 TO $499 157 LACKING COMPLETE : $150000 TO $199999 W 61 : $500 OR MORE 9 FOR SALE FOR RENT 117 PLUMBING : $200000 OR MORE 18 : NO CASH RENT 41 OWNER OCCUPIED f 61714 : OCCASIONAL USE 173 : 28 OWNER : MEDIAN ________________________________________________________________ f 70900 MEDIAN $291 VACANT FOR SALE $ 62500 OTHER VACANT : OCC 1 63 RENTER OCC 2 ; 33 OCCUPIED HOUSING BY NUMBER OF PERSONS UNITS 37 OCCUPIED HOUSING 47 YEAR-ROUND UNITS BY : PERSONS IN OCCUPIED HOUSING AND TENURE UNITS BY NUMBER OCCUPANCY STATUS AND : UNITS WITH 1.01 OR MORE OWNER RENTER OF PERSONS PER ROOM AND TENURE PLUMBING FACILITIES : PERSONS PER ROOM . OCCUPIED 1 PERSON 396 OCCUPIED 786 WITH WITHOUT : (49) BY TENURE: : 2 PERSONS 959 : 775 : OWNER RENTER COMPLETE COMPLETE : OCCUPIED OCCUPIED OWNER OCC 483 : 3 PERSONS 856 439 : : PFLUMBING - PLUMBING : RENTER OCC 327 : 4 PERSONS 1235 :5 PERSONS 651 267 : 107 1.00 OR LESS 4324 2357 : OWNER OCCUPIED 4390 9 (S1) BY PLUMBING FACILITIES: 6 OR MORE : 1.01 TO 1.50 64 1.51 OR MORE_ 44 : RENTER OCCUPIED 2396 29 : COMPLETE 800 -_--__-_-__ ___--302-____._51 ____ -PEEP -11_ -__--_ _.____ 24 UNOCCUPIED 380 1 INCOMPLETE 10 46 RENTAL UNITS BY 55 YEAR-ROUND UNITS _BY NUMBER 50 PERSONS IN : 52 COUNT OF, _ 53 RENTAL 54 RENTAL OCCUPANCY STATUS OF UNITS AT ADDRESS HOUSING UNIT$ VACANT. UNITS UNITS • 1 2 TO 9 5537 LACKING BOARDED -UP VACANT VACANT RENTER OCCUPIED 2292 : 10 OR MORE 165 COMPLETE 1493 PLUMBING HOUSING FOR 2 MOS FOR 6 MOS VACANT FOR RENT 173 MOBILE HOME 10 72 UNITS OR MORE OR MORE : 2 34 25 SUPPRESSION INDICATORS : • 1N THIS LISTING OF SUMMARY TAPE FILE 1. IF AN ITEM APPEARS AS A NEGATIVE ONE (-1). THEN SUPPRESSION HAS OCCURRED. SUPPRESSION CAN TAKE EITHER OF TWO FORMS : 1) PRIMARY - THERE ARE FEWER THAN 15 PERSONS OR 5 HOUSING UNITS IN THE AREA BEING SUMMARIZED. 2) COMPLEMENTARY - SUPPRESSION HAS OCCURRED BECAUSE AN ITEM SUBJECT TO PRIMARY SUPPRESSION CAN BE OBTAINED BY SUBTRACTION. F r_ h! V' ti I%hi6i A • ti i Exclusive Agents R Woodbury, Minnesota • W d� If you search for location and value, you must see 00 Jb_C�6NDOMINIUMS' Where the planners began to dcsiFn Alderwood Condominiums the first rule was "Preserve the beauty of the site." Tucked into a natural hardwood forest, Alderwood immediately stands apart from the development atmosphere of most condominium projects. Every condo has its own fenced patio or patio balcony, every condo with a view — there are no back doors at Alderwood. There's privacy to be preserved, spacious- ness toenjoy. And there's location. Alderwood is adjacent to Wood- bury's Potawatomi Park, near Odawa Park, Battle Creek and Shawnee Parks. Far enough away and near enough to use are Free- ways 94 and 494. Shopping centers, churches and schools are minutes away and ou drive to the sprawling 3M office complex in less time than it lakes to enjoy.a second cup of coffee in the morning. Downtown St. Paul is 10 minutes West. The St. Croix River is on the horizon to the East. Great location for the Alderwood owner. Your Alderwood Condominium . how do you judge value? Look at these advantages: You're free from outdoor maintenance respon- sibilities. The exteriorof yourbuild- ing is all brick Williamsburg Colo- nial with maintenance -free trim. Wall construction between units is double for excellent sound control. Location ... Key to the good life at Alderwood Condominiums Energy saving codes are met or ex- ceeded throughout. And the amenities, the thought- ful differences that make day-to- day living a joy, overflow at Alder - wood. Utilities are individual. Even the optional central air condi- tioning is Just for your con- dominium. as throughout, closets beyondexpectation, extra storage in your own garage plus additional outside parking. Ceramic surrounds and cultured marble in the bath. Pre -wired TV antenna and pre -wired telephone jacks. Electric dishwasher and dis- posal. Even a dead -bolt lock on your outside door. Read the featureson the inside of this folder. But more important, visit Alderwood Condominiums. See the value, the "Great Room" Maisonettes that bring a new kind of home design to middle America. Imagineourself in the natural AI- derwoolsetting. You might not want to live anyplace else. CONDOMINIUMS_ Oriole Properties 10 minutes to downtown. Open daily. 6300 Alderwood Drive, Woodbury, Minn. 55125 Phone 738-: 777 M • 12 AND INTERSTATE 94 INSTITUTIONS I. Municipal Bldg. and Library BATTLE CRFFK (( 2. Woodbury Sr -H. S. u/IATTU 3 Woodbury Jr. H S. RR CRFFK I9r 4, Woodbury Elementary ' LAKE w 5. Royal Oak Elementary 24 OQA 10! > o RECREATION F9 .i � •V Z o v i � 6. Opbway Park T- Tamarac Nature Preserve 8. Chippewa Park CONDOMINIUMS O O 29 o o tiQ e w �� 9 Menomim Park v/L{�rVj/ m 10 Shawnee Park h VALLEY (,9E�r90 �J 13 11. Evergreen 4 m d Pas ge WindwPolawa 40 01 ,��.� 0 13. o Park 3 �� 0 14-Odawa Park N 16 19r\ 1 \ `l --21 j s COMMUNITY 15. Convenience Center ��y) _ s 122 16 Proposed Wooddale Shopping _N a STEEPLEVIEW VALLEY CREEK RD Center 17, 310 �, �a r23) (` 1 18. Western Ute Ins. Co. 19. Business Area Q1 ti v rZ„ Qy �> ® CHURCHES w 20. Woodbury Baptist 0 21. Woodbury Lutheran ,.CARVER LAKE w r� V U W 3 25 22. Christ Episcopal Church 23. Woodbury United Methodist g 12 24. Lutheran Church or Peace o CARVER 25. Salem Lutheran Church l 3 LAKE RD. Location ... Key to the good life at Alderwood Condominiums Energy saving codes are met or ex- ceeded throughout. And the amenities, the thought- ful differences that make day-to- day living a joy, overflow at Alder - wood. Utilities are individual. Even the optional central air condi- tioning is Just for your con- dominium. as throughout, closets beyondexpectation, extra storage in your own garage plus additional outside parking. Ceramic surrounds and cultured marble in the bath. Pre -wired TV antenna and pre -wired telephone jacks. Electric dishwasher and dis- posal. Even a dead -bolt lock on your outside door. Read the featureson the inside of this folder. But more important, visit Alderwood Condominiums. See the value, the "Great Room" Maisonettes that bring a new kind of home design to middle America. Imagineourself in the natural AI- derwoolsetting. You might not want to live anyplace else. CONDOMINIUMS_ Oriole Properties 10 minutes to downtown. Open daily. 6300 Alderwood Drive, Woodbury, Minn. 55125 Phone 738-: 777 M • ®a .�r. jcy, . J::•Ti, r Fl�li utlA il4Ciy i-.,.,. �.� ,lit � ••• !l 1 ..� t -.� Il+iaf+l 11�� I 1 Y1 CD ,yt Y)) Srr 1 i I'll ,sll fil`�JI {rT�{r1l 1rY Y'tr rl ,la !% •� l r1, \j'}♦11�:4` r iL \alj rl: I llfJl It �d� J4l ill! i J1�` LTr rl f 'd r - �.� r71 ylr k 1 11T 1 �r".J_ 1 f, 1A1 6Jt1a :` , fl� I 4yyj� ,;94- 4J . tFl , �9aa{i4/JY Li. ® .'!�. J �Sy i1i n a, tl St l,l/ / 1 /It I } /T /�( ' /, it • 1 ♦lt 16JY yEt a yv,r %. J- r J {Ll - 6 Pt, Ftl1 tti r'Iti ' `/ �{1Ir '' It Y/,t u/ / •/ IL•• y \rail },hl I ap,1't L Ir -i S• ! tai! re 1'l \\ht{1 I ,Y! I,l -L r {1 GI 1 1 -jt 5/G aal rie j,}!a r rt - ��® 1•. ^11j sI tJ h{'JYJ4- ;l/fl/P r .. (f '1 ll af•rl, 4r(La y rr G +' o I +L It/ -L a.a rf�Sa ,}.. rr, 1a6 i'f�Jt 1 .It/ 1•t j rrl lt6ct IILG{}�. 1, 111 lr'J /`�u 6l r!}1. Jt L I Aj`Ir y Ir l'}1% 1r , 1�}kL t/� .': i'{, jLfll it 1'`/11 f. •l rYJ fir{i J �) h1 ilt Pft f. 11 i.I—•^ , .tI • r'4re 11 YIYIh, �L Y is 1 t .f al 4 �^ , < • J.%:l_. r 11 �tJ1��1 r!�i!%'J `: to �S•f tTM.ti"frJ�(/J,i,,1 rt 1 •/ C i 11 . ,�— 1,}, -Jr Af tt.l fl IJ '� ••,r,l \ .... ,+!`'�y'r ;.0..Lr-_r4V3VV ONIA�� rfY` II I;Vs;r. 1•P'1 k t / y'l)411 t' r T�LrS/ n IV, 1 r. r �II iJ Q�a f,r Yr l.,Y •y, 1, %il l6{y+.3 r. ! fl r�a n31a rJ �l,i)1 Fjfp�l (t,!1(ll rF :' r al• it r(,r, S� e - / tf: tr,i �, YI • ty t s i N 1 ? , !}-1, La J 5)11Y.1 ip J�t.':t \ i•=1� 'Y JYd la / Tila 1� t I\r5 r {IIT i "1 5I il, sF 1 t iik�'}t+ra Y/I ;'=r Vj afI I' % rC ai rl/r �/ -Jr J,l i 7 I Ila i :!H/ Ilr�t vi j•A Y 4 a4' �j 1 i Z r. l,l frJJY`•l � I .Iil 1/��'FYeYJ r lr�f I/6Jrrr. i Sr r•F ~ .V Ilif 1 f J JI h, f r, I • t' . ••, •t1 41 I ,• ai •/ I r. rl ®� Z a Y 1 J } ( I. ♦1. • r' ♦ it _ !� } r f, t\lt r lA,Ilfr, a,i J' FI✓r fI i.-! • �l00 ON09�N 1 ♦ • A I, S ra ,f A"N0 + - a .fij L S 4,•l rtj ji •1 t 1 T+tTJa r i 1! l! ! -a(, � -, - i T • _Jf) • 1 f e J,IV Y 1 I ,SF. t la t ! r f r`' - •_ , • ! 4 -. 1 I ifi�' l � j • L 1 %Y .� t 1lr, 11' 4 ( -al ', ( '.1 . Stl � r ', 1 1, `{ ` rY li- i � 1,}lra4 �( s f) /,:��iM,ly •�f 'r' f./F� JJ ,Ii!'a4'r rt; 1 1', , all- {'. ( - ! 'v ✓..i lJ Jh1, 1! 1R al • hJ -I •} �.t5 a, 1 , I 1' 11 a' Ial) I ' ' LI /t r 1 Tt t I • /r .. , 1 w -ea r r ,tu , , ,lrfi IL"a = ti f tl1 it a •LI L 1 ft pita 1 F {L ;fl le, La, _\ f -r, , 'a,J, `( f ! iFr rl fh I'j,4 1--1. rt`Lr/ rn lrJ ! \111 ,•ak 7 - ., I ,J r It ,rJ t r r l '.L '1♦ al 1' I - •.y1J . 1 f .f11 ! H1, i •F 1 f t•= . p [ I L / It a.. ;'1•!111 , p`'l. j1f -rlr l I rl )!u f-'rl sr1 rY41j IrllL h,lr i-I�.'!'ri Gl 1' rld�;- rrj ->j 1. t7J rS .. yE1 rt'�y i 1 /•.11 r. /. Stt }.-.��'. ..1. Li 1 /tfk-1/� Yr <. Jy 1/1 . tf '� L. of l.5 +l'�rt`ra;. 4l 1' f � + ar • =r i, ` 1 4 1. F i r, i - a r' r a u f ;if<�J, ,r Ii IY 1 r- �,� L t r / f �' N 1r • !•I ,�J p /4 jSr!!t Sjll, i1 -�J r fa /1. r,� al/r f♦ 1{ P� 4tr1 rf e a I ki i J11t- r •J�( ', ,.a `T"ir -, l ( l '. ' , :' r�Jf 1 l ` l L• II '_ I, la1 I/:1 I rr;= f�i/}}J'/Y!'rttfa I JJ Li iar 111 e. i,l llr-}'a \II ! J t o E Z x t l � t la ,• 41 ,�' a , r- � f , , I -:r , f , rl o 6 l�1qq, I �.,t 1 rt L -. a I/.. e , ,r1.'Y �q , tut tyV' 1 -tta .r .J. r:r •,: G •ist >_t llt' M1t LIt1%7f(/ll.�ffiif ij lU11t1Y fIF,tf' m /1tlr.1.t6, fTf rtf if\lSl ala, lr lr++/f,.fr11 �a O�t `a �1rlrYi r4r rJ ..1� Il `lYl 1'� J. f.V e j Ail. ry,1'.t ,j a,l 11(wJ t/}!:t le (r.� , Ifi4 a 1 1.\1a , 7 V��T Td !'• lr ,q 1��FJ ll•�,r �F47<�!aq d. S' `f eYe 'L • G1, Tial/i ": �tv 1 r. •.,'• � •, yi° t tl •.�J 1 ll ,•r Jr, r(aY,t 4 frtl i�f,i 4� lAl!/� e4 1-�E ,f1%.r;• 14, OEMINIF It i /s4 ;11i f�i��r arr fv, r/1 .i N�11l�1r lti5 .%r .• I t.-, . ,•1 i LL YV .1 j,l♦ f. t•. • '' 1 � t. •,�.�. - .. , / i i I 1i, /.�, r s�.l1 J 1 !'f . t 1 I ui. 1 , j}tj a, a i APC Minutes February 25, 1982 LEXINGTON PLACE - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of U. S. Homes Corporation and Orrin Thompson for preliminary plat approval for Lexington Place consis- ting of 84.62 acres and containing 28 condominium buildings for a total of 672 dwelling units was presented to the Planning Commission. The property is currently zoned R-4 located west of Lexington at the extension of Duckwood Drive. The density could range between 12 and 22 dwelling units per acre and the land use indicates north of Duckwood is R-3 (Mixed Residential) at a density of 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre. South of Duckwood is R-2 with a density of 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre. The gross density would be 7.9 dwelling units per acre and net density would be 9.17 per acre. He has proposed to plat each of the 28 condominium buildings into a separate lot that would conform with the ordinance requirements. Each building would be 3 stories and contain 24 units each but with a mix of 6 studio units, 7 one - bedroom units and 11 two-bedroom units for a total of 24 units per building on a general basis. There would be 12 car garages at either end of each building and a request was made to reduce the parking from 2.5 to 2.0 spaces per unit. An earlier application had been submitted in 1981 for development on the same property and Orrin Thompson Homes had not pursued the proposal at that time. Bob Hoffman, Orrin Thompson, Bob Carlson and Chuck Winden appeared for the applicant. Studios would be priced under $40,000.00 and larger units at a higher price range. All would be for -sale units and would be approved for FHA financing. Tot lots would be included and two outdoor swimming pools. No tennis courts would be included in the proposal. An explanation of the ex- terior decor, landscaping, berming, etc. took place by representatives of the applicant and it was suggested by a number of neighbors present that Lexington should be upgraded in order to alleviate the heavy traffic problems even at the present time. Other neighboring property owners objected to being assessed for storm sewer improvements and Mr. Colbert stated the area bene- fited would most likely be assessed for storm sewer improvements. Mr. Carlson stated that child density would be about 0.18 children per unit. School children bus traffic was a concern of neighboring owners and compliance with the character of the other single-family residences in the area. It was suggested that a review of the storm sewer issue take place by the staff before council review. Mr. Thompson indicated that they expected to commence construction north of Deerwood Drive initially, and that all construction would be completed in 3 to 4 years. The grading plans are not complete but the berms and plantings are planned extensively on the project. There were concerns about resale to speculators and it was noted that there could be no control over such resale after the initial purchase by an owner -occupant. It was also noted that the number of units may change as sales occur, depending on the demand for specific types of units. The hearing commenced at 8:10 p.m. and at 9:25 p.m., Krob moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Cross easements and parking easements shall be granted on the lots which are served by common access for more than one dwelling unit and shall be reviewed by the City staff prior to recording. 4 39 0 0 APC Minutes February 25, 1982 2. The outside parking spaces shall be of 10 x 20 dimension and the parking areas shall be surfaced with concrete curbing around the perimeter of the parking areas. 3. Homeowner Association Articles and By -Laws for the development shall be submitted and reviewed prior to the final plat of the first stage. 4. Detailed landscaping plans shall be submitted and approved by the City and a landscape bond shall be required for an adequate amount and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 5. The preliminary plat shall be reviewed by the Eagan Park Committee and be subject to the Park Committee's recommendations. 6. The 2.5 parking spaces per ordinance requirement shall be reduced to one covered space and one parking space per unit. 7. The preliminary plat shall be reviewed by Dakota County's Plat Commission and subject to their recommendations. 8. All other ordinance requirements shall be met. 9. Temporary service for sanitary sewer will be allowed through the Tomark Addition for this proposed development under the condition that the internal sanitary sewer system shall provide flexibility in allowing approxi- mately 60% of this development to be redirected in the future through the Windcrest trunk system to the south. 10. A storm sewer system connecting the proposed northerly pond (DP -18) with the pond in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue (DP -5) must be constructed as a condition of final plat approval. 11. A positive gravity storm sewer outlet to service the property south of Duckwood Drive must be constructed to Hurley Lake in addition to developing the internal ponding area referenced as JP -45. 12. The construction of a 44 foot, 9 ton collector street for the extension of Duckwood Drive to the east plat line shall be the responsibility of this development. 13. A 60 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Lexington Avenue. An 80 foot right-of-way shall be dedicated for Duckwood Drive. 14. All related trunk area assessments and lateral benefits from exist- ing trunk utilities shall be paid or levied at the time of final plat approval, if not listed as a pending assessment under an approved project by the City of Eagan. 40 0 0 APC Minutes February 7.5, 1982 15. Drainage/ponding easements approved by the City shall be dedicated of sufficient size to incorporate the required storage capacities as follows: (DP -18 - 11.2 acre feet for a controlled elevation of 876.0) (JP -45 - 7.8 acre feet with a controlled elevation of 890.3) 16. This development shall provide for a future storm sewer outlet from Pond JP -46 within the Carriage Hills Golf Course. 17. Ten foot drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated adjacent to all public rights-of-way and adjacent to private property. 18. A 5 foot concrete sidewalk should be installed along the north side of Duckwood Drive as a part of this development. An 8 foot bituminous trail - way should be constructed along the east side of Lexington Avenue within a 10 foot easement adjacent to the west line of this proposed plat. In addition, a walkway connection to the southeast corner of this plat should be provided as indicated by the Advisory Park and Recreation Committee. Those in favor were Hall, Rrob, Mulrooney and Turnham. Wilkins and McCrea voted no. Member Wilkins stated that she felt that the City should not be a testing ground for up to 168 efficiency units in the 28 buildings. There were strong concerns regarding the inclusion of the studio units in the com- plex. COMSE;RV NO. 1 - PRELIMINARY PLAT The hearing regarding the application of Comsery Corporation for prelimi- nary plat approval of Comsery No. 1 consisting of 63 acres with one lot of approximately 41.09 acres for corporate headquarters and one outlot of 21 acres for future use was convened by Chairman Charles Hall. The property is zoned I-1 and allows an office building as a permitted use within the dis- trict. Also, the land use provides for industrial and therefore zoning and comprehensive land use guide both allow for the proposed use. The Comsery Corporation's international corporate headquarters is proposed for Lot 1, Block 1, and the first phase office building would include 179,529 square feet. The building would be between 3 and 4 stories, depending on the ground elevation around the building, with two future expansions, one possibly in 1984 and one in 1985. The projected employment is 359 employees with 1983 employment of 490. Potential future employment is 1,000 to 1,100 employees. Parking required would be 1,017 spaces and the proposal is for 862 spaces. The applicant indicates that 962 is more than adequate for current purposes. The applicant also requested 9 x 20 foot parking spaces, rather than the 10 x 20 foot requirement of the City. Mr. Bob Worthington of Rauenhorst, Jerry Fain of Comsery and Mike Ryan of Rauenhorst were present for the applicant. There was discussion concerning phasing the project and Mr. Fain indicated that Comsery does design programming for manufacturing companies on an inter- national basis. The employee hours of employment are staggered and further, the applicant intends to retain as many actual amenities as possible and will Install jogging paths, indoor physical facilities, etc. The roof top will be 6 Y. 0 s Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Fourteen PROPOSED CONDITIONS/SOPERAMERICA PLAT B. Discussion Regarding Proposed Conditions for SuperAmerica Final Plat -- The SuperAmerica Corporation made application to the City of Eagan in 1978 for a preliminary plat approval and conditional use to allow a service station to have a convenience center attached to a service station in a General Business District. In 1978, the APC recommended denial of the preliminary plat and conditional use permit. The City Council recommended approval of the prelimi- nary plat and conditional use permit, however, there were no condi- tions attached to the preliminary plat approval. On September 1, 1981, a Mr. E. Lewis Schuette appeared from Columbus, Indiana, representing SuperAmerica. The City Council, at that time, approved renewal of the conditional use permit and preliminary plat which had expired for SuperAmerica. Due to the fact there was not a new public hearing scheduled to reconsider the conditional use permit, there were no conditions placed on the renewal of the pre- liminary plat and conditional use permit. The applicants are now in the process of finalizing the preliminary plat and in the prepa- ration of the development agreement. Normally, the City would require in conditions for preliminary plat or conditional use permit that there be concrete curbing around the perimeter of the parking area, that a detail landscape plan be submitted, that an adequate landscaping bond be provided for the landscape bond and that the bond is not released until at least one year after the landscaping is completed and all easements are required by the City Engineer. One additional concern the City staff has had during the entire process of considering the SuperAmerica plat is in regard to the right in turn and the right out turn onto Yankee Doodle Road. Apparently, this was approved with the preliminary plat and City staff would like for the City Council to possibly change or amend this action as a part of a final plat approval. For background information, a copy of the original report prepared by the consul- ting planner, John Voss, and action of the City Council is enclosed on pages 4 3 through 4 7 for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny consi- deration to add certain conditions to the final plat for incorpora- tion into a development agreement as suggested by the City staff. GiL-1 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN __ ... S'UEJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Plat PETITIONER: Super America LOCATION: S'd Quadrant of Pilot Knob Rd b IIDATE OF HEARING: May 23, 1978 v�...» r,,.,aie an - �EXISTIi:G ZONING: General Business (B-3) II DATE OF PLANNING REPORT: May 18, 1978 I PREPARED BY: John S. Voss -ET ITION The petitions are for - a conditional use permit in order to operate a service station at the southwest corner of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Coodle Road, and prell•-in.ary pl-` in :or to plat this parcel into a sing J loto =?tail as The coning o -:•-ante (52.07, Suodivislc. ICC) per- .`s motor fuel :ales by conditional use permiT in :e-.aral Business - B-3 - districts, however, retail sales of convenlenu goo:s such as �ceries, are not permitted. The petitioner intends to ask the City Coun-iI to ex;!-!:! the uses permitted In B-3 districts to Include retail sales of can - veniance Items ..hen the conditional use petition Is acted upon by the Council. (See attached remora -dam.) 2. Drivewav Access to Pilot Knob Road and Yarkee !)ccdle Road The proposed site plan shows driveway accesses b both Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot K P.oa�. It has tae, assumed by the City that this lot would onlu be served by access f 81st Street as platted in the Bicentennial Addition to'the west. Jurisdiction over granting these accesses would Ile with Cakota County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, related to future 1-35E construction. A preliminary indication is that the Minnesota ^apartment of Transportation would not permit (by purchase of access) direct access to Pilot Knob Road, however, Dakota Cour nay approve a rignr turn, In and out access along Yankee Coodle Road. In any Instant the petitioner snould revise the site plan In order to orient driveways to 81st Stree EW 4. 5. ner31 Business (B-3) Zonin Inconsistent I This property was zoned commerclal several years ago and designated B-3 when tfie Zaning Ordinance No. 52 was adopted. Since then, the Yankee Square Shopping Center has develoi under Neighborhood Business (NB) and Roadside Business (RB) requirements. This single lot, zoned B-3, is now inconsistent with zoning In the area and that Is why service bays would not be required as they were on the site to the west. . Consideration should be given to rezoning this lot to Roadside Business (RB) cons)stens with the adjacent property to the west. Also, allowing no access from this rope except to 81st Street, would appear to make traffic functions at the Pilot Knob Roadd/ Yankee Doodla Road intersection much safer and efficient. I Site Design I The site plan is generally well-designed except for the accesses. Also, a detalled landscape pia: needs to b b e su mitted. I Preliminary Plat The relic.. ,- � p plat is a simple one lot pla- =.a' accesses are a -oncern and ded'- c2ticn of ri; --of along County =-,,i- sho.... require. by Danofa Ccunty. I:1D IL �.,.�._ . Page 5 5-23-78 SUPERAHERICA PRELIMINARY PIAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERIT. The public hearing relating to the application of Superamerica for preliminary plat approval and conditional use permit for service station and convenience center at the southwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road was next convened by the Chairman. Mr. John Hoganson and Mr. Richard Townsend appeared for the applicants. There would be thirty-four parking spaces on the parcel and Mr. Hoganson stated that the Dakota County Highway Department did not have an objection to a right turn in and a right turn out lane from Yankee Doodle Road to the parcel. It was noted that the City of Eagan has for several years recommendedgranting access to Washington Drive only for safety reasons. Planning Commission members were concerned about the private access to the shopping center through the Superamerica station if access to Yankee Doodle were granted, similar to the problems of the Texaco station or. Cedar and Highway #13. Further there appeared to be insufficient setback for the access from Pilot Knob Road, as the access was extremely close to 35E. Mr. Townsend indicated that the access to Yankee Doodle Road is critical to the proposal and further he stated that there will be no outside storage on the premises. Sperling moved and Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of both application for reasons including those stated above, that the proposed access to Yankee Doodle Road was not conducive to safety, because the City has been planning for access only through Washington Drive, that the City has had a similar experience with the Texaco station creating congestion and that the access is too close to the intersection of Pilot Knob Road. All members voted in favor except Dembroski ,,1,^el.c.��.. n.i Tv . SUPERAMERICA STATION. Mr. John Hoganson and another representative of SuperAmerica appeared on behalf of its application for preliminary plat approval and conditional use permit for a service station and convenience center at the Southwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road. The A.P.C. recommended denial.- It was noted that the Dakota County Staff has indicated access to Yankee Doodle would be permitted for right turns only. The Council reviewed the application and the recommendation of the Planning Commission. It was noted that residents in the general area strongly favored the application, and that the site plan appeared to be well laid out and appears to meet the Ordinance requirements. Parranto moved and Murphy seconded the motion, all members voted yea to grant approval of the conditional use permit to include retail sales of convenience items. Parranto moved and Murphy seconded the motion to approve the preliminary plat for the SuperAmerica location. 421 members voted in favor. Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Fifteen 0 SOOTHFORK RESTAURANT C. Request for 24 Hour Operation to Serve Food for Southfork Res- taurant -- At the April 6, 1982 City Council meeting, Mr. Stan Lynn, owner of Southfork Restaurant, represented by his attorney, Mr. Richard Gabriel, made a request to operate the Southfork Res- taurant on a 24 hour basis. Currently, the liquor ordinance prohi- bits the operation of a restaurant beyond the hours of the sale of liquor, and, therefore, a variance or ordinance amendment would be required. The City Attorney did address the issue and stated that an ordinance amendment is required if the City Council wishes to consider this type of operation. The City Administrator was directed to review the matter with the Chief of Police and the City Attorney was asked to prepare additional information and sug- gestions for an ordinance amendment to be considered at the April 20, 1982 meeting. Enclosed on pages 49 through_ 3 is a copy of a letter from the City Attorney's oF'ficewwith proposed additional wording for an ordinance amendment as well as copies of the current ordinances that prohibit sale of food, requiring that all persons vacate the licensed premises within 30 minutes of the time that the sale of such intoxicating liquor has ceased. Also enclosed on page .5't=is a copy of a memorandum from Chief of Police Des- Lauriers, providing some comments on the request for 24 hour food service. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the request of Southfork Restaurant to be open 24 hours a day for the purpose of serving food both during and after the sale of liquor. 0 0 HAUGE, SauTEC, EIDE & IILLLEn, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS ]BOB SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA 66122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 April 15, 1982 Re: 24-hour Restaurants -- Sales of 3.2 Beer, Wine, or Liquor Dear Tom: AREA COOK 512 TELEPHONE 464.4224 We have been requested to devise an alternative ordinance allowing service of food past the hours for service of beer, wine or intoxicating liquor in an establishment serving both food and such liquor. Attached is a copy of Ordinance Section 42.13, Subdivision 2, and Ordinance Section 43.10, Subdivision 10, as they are presently enacted. In each case, the last sentence of the paragraph prevents an establishment serving intoxicating or non -intoxicating liquor from staying open past the hours allowed for the sale of such liquor. Obviously, the last sentence can be stricken in one or both cases allowing an establishment serving intoxicating liquor and/or 3.2/wine establishments to stay open without restriction for the serving of food. However, it was suggested to us that there should be some restriction as not all establishments are of a type for which it is desirable to allow longer hours on the pretext of serving food when liquor may very well be consumed. Therefore, we are submitting one possible restriction although there are many other possibilities which would provide some control over the types of establish- ments that will be allowed to remain open. Attached to the copy of these ordinance sections is additional wording which can be applied to both sections or to only the section applying to establishments selling 3.2 and/or wine. Other restrictions that could be used include: requiring the service of food a set number of hours per day; requiring that all liquors be locked away at a set time; requiring a separate bar room which can be closed at a set time; requiring that liquor glasses be removed from tables at a set time; and/or that the bar be covered when the sale of liquor is not allowed. Sincerely, David G. Keller skk enclosures 4 9 0 • PROPOSED ADDITIONAL WORDING However, if the establishment is a restaurant which provides seating for at least people, serves (intoxicating/non-intoxicating liquor or wine) only in conjunction with the service of food at tables, and does not have a bar for the sale of such liquor, it may remain open to serve food after the time the sale of such liquor has ceased. SO £'sC : iON 12. I3 J C&)k ; OF OPERATION Subd. 1. - No sale of into>.ic.as._ug liquors shall be siade after 1:00 a.m. 1 on Sunday, For between the hours of 1:00 a.m: and 3:00 p.m. on Memorial bay, nor between the routs of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on auy alection d::y, in the district in whiah such election shall be held. No on -sale shall be made between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. on any week day. No .,ff-sale shall be made before 8:00 a.m. or after 8:00 .p.m. of any day except Saturday on which off -sale may be made until 10:00 p.m. No off -sale shall be made on New Year's Day, ��. Januar t., Memorial Day, Mayl3fth; Independence Day, July 4th; Thanksgiving C.9y `)t or Christmas Day, December 25th; but on evenings preceeding ouch, if the sale of �`\ liqucr is not otherwise prohibited on such evenings, off -sale may be made until 10:00 p.m. except that. no off -sale shall be made on December 24th after 5:00 p,m. Sunday sale hours shall be between the hours of 12 o'clock noon to 12 o'rioc:k midnight. Subd. 2. -- No person shall consume beer or intoxicating liquor :n sr;; licensed establishment in this V111aga at any time more than 30 minutes after the time for selling such intoxicati--W liquor has ceased, except that employees may c*resume beer or intoxicating liquor fox one hour after the time for selling such intoxicating liquor has ceased. Proof of employment must be shown upon request of any official Village personnel. It shall be the personal responsibil'- ty of each licensee to see that the terms of this section are complied with. Further all nersons other than employees shall vacate the licensed premises within 30 minutes R tar the time the sale of such into-icating Uquor has nsat:ud. Subd. 3. -- Nothing herein shall be construed as prohibiting Che u•nou^tption of InLoxSca•,ing liquor on Sundeys between Lhe hours of 12:00 neea r.nd 12:10 midnight of the premises which operate a dicing room serving mealc regu- lcrl.y and which has a seating capacity for 30 or more people, when such consump- tion is not prohibited by state law. -14- S/ provided, however, that • such premises are duly liceneeifor operation as a tavern under the ordinances of the Village relating to taverns, such dancing, exhibitions or entertainment may be permitted. Subd. 7. -- INSPECTION OF PREMISES -- Any peace officer shall have the unqualified right to enter, inspect and 'search the premises of a licensee during business hours without a search and seizure warrant. Subd. 8. -- RESPONSIBI*T_TY -- Every licensee shall be responsible for the conduct of his place of business and shall maintain conditions of sobriety and order. Subd. 9.--VIOIATION BY AGENT -- Any act of any clerk, barkeeper, agent, servant, or employee, in violation hereof, shall be deemed the act of the employer and licenses of such place, as well as that of said clerk, barkeeper, agent, servant, or employee, and every such employer and licensee shall be liable to all the penaltiesprovided herein for the violation of same, equally with the said clerk, barkeeper, agent, servant, or employee. Subd. 10. -- HOURS OF OPERATION -- No sale of non-intoxicationg liquors shall be made after 1:00 a.m. on Sunday, nor between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. on Memorial Day., nor between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m, on any election day, in the district in which such election shall be held. No on - sale shall be made between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on any week day. No off -sale shall be made before 8:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. of any day except Saturday on which off -sale may be made until 10:00 p.m. No off -sale shall be made on New Year's Day, January let; Memorial Day, May 30th; Independence Day, July 4th; Thanksgiving Day or Christmas Day, December 25tb; but on evenings preceeding such, if the sale of liquor is not otherwise prohibited on such even- titngs, off -sale may be made until 10:00 p.m, except that no off -sale shall be made un December 24th after 8:00 p.m. Sunday sale hours shall be between the hours of 12 o'clock noon to 12 o'clock midnight. No person shall consume beer or 1 -5- r non -intoxicating *or in any licensed establishment in this Village at any time more than 30 minutes after the time for selling such non -intoxicating r' I liquor has.ceased, except that employees may consume beer or non -intoxicating liquor for one hour after the time for selling such non -intoxicating liquor has ceased. Proof of employment must be shown upon request of any official / Village personnel. It shall be the personal responsibility of each licensee to see that the terms of this section are complied with. Further, all persons other than employees shall vac9te the licensed premises within 30 minutes after the time the sale of such non -intoxicating liquor has ceased, Subd. 11 -- STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS -- All windows in the front of any licensed place shall be of clear glass, and the view of the whole interior shall be unobstructed by screens, curtains or partitions. There shall be no partition, box, stall, screen, curtain or other device which obstructs the view of any part of the room from the general observation of persons in the room; but partitions, subdivisions, or panels not higher than forty-eight inches from the floor shall not be considered obstructions. Subd. 12. -- MIXING -- It shall be unf9vful for any licensee, his agents, or employees to mix, or sell for the purpose of mixing, any such malt liquor, or to suffer or permit upon the premises named in his license, any mixing or spiking of malt liquor, soft drinks, or any other liquor or beverage by adding to or with the same any alcohol or other intoxicating liquor. Subd. 13. -- INTOXICATED PERSONS -- It shall be unlawful for any licensee, his agents, or employees to sell or serve non -intoxicating liquor to any intoxicated person, or to permit an intoxicated person to remain upon the premises licensed. Subd. 14. -- SPIKING -- Ic all premie-, licensed for on -sale under this ordinance, a sign saying "No Spiking Allowed," or "No Spiking," of sufficient size and clarity to be easily read by all persons in said premises shall be -6- S3 Aer VLaon i3oher MepartnWt TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: Liquor License Establishments Remaining Open 24 -hours for Food Service 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan. Minnesota 55122 14 April 1982 I have talked to several people in the liquor licensing busi- ness, including people from the State and Minneapolis. Minneapolis does have several locations that have a liquor License and that do remain open all night for food service. Minneapolis has some restrictions in their ordinance; e.g.: The establishment must remain open for a specific number of hours such as 18 to 24 hours per day. This prevents the owner from opening the establishment at 2100 hours and remaining open during the night-time hours The liquor and bar must be secured away from the general public after the liquor closing hour. The definition of secured" is not defined specifically, however, it is recommended that "secure" means in a separate room or removed from the general public area and locked up in a storage area. At this time, it is my recommendation to the City Council that they do not permit extended hours for food service. I do not see a benefit to the city or to the general public to permit our liquor establishments to remain open 24 hours for food service. In fact, I think it could be a policing problem at this time. itilain DesLauriers C MD/vk 54 THE LONE OAK TREE — THE SY2t1BOL OF STRENGTH & GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY r.:` -: Martin DesLauriers- Chief of Police �== Jay M. Berthe Assistant Chief o/' Police TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: Liquor License Establishments Remaining Open 24 -hours for Food Service 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan. Minnesota 55122 14 April 1982 I have talked to several people in the liquor licensing busi- ness, including people from the State and Minneapolis. Minneapolis does have several locations that have a liquor License and that do remain open all night for food service. Minneapolis has some restrictions in their ordinance; e.g.: The establishment must remain open for a specific number of hours such as 18 to 24 hours per day. This prevents the owner from opening the establishment at 2100 hours and remaining open during the night-time hours The liquor and bar must be secured away from the general public after the liquor closing hour. The definition of secured" is not defined specifically, however, it is recommended that "secure" means in a separate room or removed from the general public area and locked up in a storage area. At this time, it is my recommendation to the City Council that they do not permit extended hours for food service. I do not see a benefit to the city or to the general public to permit our liquor establishments to remain open 24 hours for food service. In fact, I think it could be a policing problem at this time. itilain DesLauriers C MD/vk 54 THE LONE OAK TREE — THE SY2t1BOL OF STRENGTH & GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Sixteen NEW: iBUSiINESS SIGNCRAFTERS OUTDOOR DISPLAY A. Signcrafters Outdoor Display, Inc., Charles Peugh, for a Pylon Business Sign -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the March 23, 1982 meeting to consider an application submitted by Signcrafters Outdoor Display for a condi- tional use permit to allow a pylon sign at the Contract Beverages Building located at 2755 Hwy. 55. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the pylon sign subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. For additional information on this item, refer to the planning assistant's report, a copy of which is enclosed on pages 56 through S For a copy of the action that was taken by the TP'C-,—refer to page (moo . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC to approve the pylon sign request. s5 CITY OF EAGAN 0 SUBJECT: CCNDITICNAL USE PERMIT - PYLCN SIGN APPLICANT: SIGNCRAF= OUTDOOR DISPLAY, INC. - CHARLES PEUGH LOCATION: PART OF THE W' OF SECTION 2 - 2755 HIGHWAY 55 EXISTING ZONING: I-1 (LICET IMUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVID M. OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign at the Contract Beverages building located at 2755 Highway 55. The proposed sign would be, non -illuminated and made of plywood and it would in- dicate the location of the recycling area of the Contract Beverages building. A conditional use permit is needed for this sign because any business free- standing ground sign which projects more than 7 feet above ground level is con- sidered a pylon sign which requires a conditional use permit. The proposed sign would project 14 feet from ground level and the total area of the sign would be 84 square feet. The Sign Ordinance #16 states that pylon signs may not project more than 27 feet above ground level and may not exceed 125 square feet in area per side. There- fore, the proposed sign is meeting these requirements of Ordinance #16. The pro- posed sign also meets the requirement of being 300 feet from any other pylon sign. If approved, the pylon sign shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) The pylon sign may not be located within 300' of any other pylon sign measured on the sane side of the street. 2) The pylon sign may not project more than 27 feet above ground level. 3) The pylon sign may not exceed 125 square feet of signage per area. 4) The pylon sign shall not be located nearer than 10 feet from any proper- ty or dividing line. 5) The sign shall be in conformance with all other applicable ordinances. DMO/jack SG /f 11 ,CONTRACT mr.%a T k, LINU ttyy 'tip �r DcM 'WW PiTGN PRoP�� S/TE of • MclrEE En-ERPRIs4:6- Ii r �T_ 07 R-1 .gyp rl. i - E GENTIAN ROA ;\ R-I� /' I G B A' A RBRB�� (* I pa SUBG 0 3 7' PD Ll 4 -CK 0 KJ's 1= �--� PD PL T 9-5 I ; P D I r 74-0 C) Ll A RSC '- EX 1 I 0 SLL f' Ki Lw -4 A EAGANDA FE - �TEFi A L I LONEO AK ROAD L I A} 1 3B4 SLI A 'EA 19DAILE' Ll --r G B R- 7— - T-- - i NB --t.i . POSTAL � I I GB A] :RviCE -1 c�_ - - _�. R -I i _ti LI 0 • SIGNCRAPTBRS OUTDOOR DISPLAY _ CORTRACT BEVERAGES _ SIGN PERMIT The public hearing regarding the application of Signcrafters Outdoor Display and Contract Beverages for conditional use permit for pylon sign at 2755 Highway #55, was next convened by the Chairman. Mr. Charles Peugh appeared for Signcrafters as did a representative of Contract Beverages. There were several questions but no objections. Bohne moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following conditions: lThe pylon sin may not be locatd wit pylon signmeasured on the same side of thee str ethin 300 feet of any other. 2. The pylon sign may not project more than 27 feet above ground level. 3. The pylon sign may not exceed 125 square feet of signage per area. 4. The pylon sign shall not be located nearer than 10 feet from any property or dividing line. 5. The sign shall be in conformance with all other applicable ordi- nances. All voted yea. rco 0 • Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Seventeen VARIANCE REQUEST - DONALD RASMUSSEN B. Donald Rasmussen for a Variance for a Garage Setback at 1525 Cliff Road -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission on March 23, 1982 to consider an application submitted by Mr. Donald Rasmussen for a variance to allow a garage 5' from the rear lot line instead of the 15' as required in the ordinance. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the variance to the City Council. It was noted at the APC hearing that surrounding property owners were not in opposition to the request and if the garage were located 15' instead of the 5' that some maple trees would have to be removed. For a copy of the plan- ning assistant's report, refer to pages 6 Z through 65' For a copy of the minutes regarding the motion, re of r to page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the variance request by Donald Rasmussen as recommended for approval by the APC. 61 u CITY OF EAGAN E s SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: DONALD RASMUSSEN ` LOCATION: SE; OF SECTION 28, 1525 CLIFF ROAD EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (RFSTDEN'TIAL SINGLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MUCH 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 15, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVE Cxsmm, PIANNINs ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a variance rea_uest from the rear setback requirement for a garage at 1525 Cliff Road. COMMENTS: The applicant would like permission to set a garage 5 feet from the north boundary line rather than the required 15 feet, Therefore, the applicant is requesting a 10' variance. Evidently, the applicant would have to change the driveway and remove some trees if the 15' rear yard setback requirement was fol- lowed. The applicant has talked with the adjacent property owners and they have no objections to the variance. If approved, the application should be subject to the following conditions: 1) The City shall retain all existing drainage and utility easements. 2) All other City ordinances will be oamplied with. DMO/jack • n �'t�z' J A m•-u r . 4l1 w 1 IDT II RASMUSSEN4' jar ACOTION 10 T s Xqs . Ilk - ri• .d a .._ �i p /// • O m • .. .i� • `. _ ♦ 4y 2 1 @ Y L5 •1 ' :.. ' " r ,: ...� w m iia. " .•r, J ' 1 • , • . ! IDf 2 , BLOCK I S - •' r� x. RASMUSSE ! ADDITION ' `r 'ar �/• G n1 �- . -pr OUNTY ,.r. ... ex .>Y>,•e• STATE F I .,...ROAD' ��:_-AID f— "�._. s-,u• um u (oclJT/GW OF ' VHRlHNG E 64 rL1rHil-'-ANDALE .D 77 -21a.. o A Ix MGqS CalL-rs R-1 ��/ i o Z ,P� I ZI or A Ap_j/ s q o p R-4 / a 79-6 a `' RB I A FR Al"C.. S. A H 30.71 - ;" RB p A� q 73 p/ 4 t-4 d' �{ / Q THOMAS \Vf ` v t� i 3 J q HEIGF{'f-� l �OL - PF IR- I NR e,R .D 77 -21a.. A ��T MGqS CalL-rs Rl 1 ZI EAGAN v PF IR- I NR e,R 0 0 DONALD RASMUSSEN - GARAGE VARIANCE The hearing regarding the application of Mr. & Mrs. Donald Rasmussen, who were both present, for variance from rear setback requirement for the con- struction of a garage at 1525 Cliff Road was then considered. There were no objections and Mr. Rasmussen indicated it would be necessary to remove two large maple trees and 50 to 60 peony plants and would also have to change the grade of the road if the variance was not granted. Kroh moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following condi- tions: 1. The City shall retain all existing drainage and utility easements. 2. All other City ordinances shall be met. All voted in favor. M Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Eighteen PRELIMINARY PLAT - OAKWOOD HEIGHTS C. Countryside Builders, Inc., Jerry Lagro, for a Preliminary Plat for Oakwood Heights, Consisting of Approximately 9.59 Acres for Townhouse Development -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the March 23, 1982 APC regular meeting to consider an application for a preliminary plat entitled Oakwood Heights Condominiums consisting of approximately 9.59 acres and containing 60 condominium units. The Advisory Planning Commis- sion, after considerable discussion, is recommending approval to the City Council. The point of main concern expressed by the APC was in regard to the R-2 zoning of the PD and the density allowed by a townhouse development. There was also considerable discussion regarding the private streets vs. public streets and density being allowed to include the private streets but not public. It was noted at the meeting that the area is isolated and there were no objections to the proposed development. There was an additional condition placed on the preliminary plat and that was to reduce the density from the proposed 60 to 55 dwelling units. For addi- tional information on this item, refer to the City Planner's report enclosed on pages (,00 through SO . For an additional report, refer regarding the r3uction in e'nsi-ty, refer to the City Plan- ner's memorandum enclosed on pages ch I through 63 For action that was taken by the APC, refer to pages g!} through 00.< ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Oakwood Heights Condominiums as recommended for approval by the APC. 6-7 0 SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: E CITY OF EAGAN •• 1 • �•. a•,• PART OF THE A OF THE SFA4 OF SECTION 26 PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT) WITH AN R-2, 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE MARCH 23, 1982 MARCH 18, 1982 DALE C. RUNXM, CITY PIRRM APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a prelimi- nary plat, Oakwood Heights Condominiums, which consists of approximately 9.59 acres and contains 60 condominium dwelling units. ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently the site is zoned PD (Planned Development District) and has a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed plat is part of the Lexington South Planned Development. The site is designated on the Comprehensive Guide Plan also as R-2, Mixed Residential, with a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. In reviewing the development proposal, the applicant is proposing a town- house condominium development which is consistent with the 3-6 dwelling units per acre. In reviewing the development proposal, staff uses the R-3 zoning category with 6,000 square feet per unit density which would allow 7.26 dwelling units per acre. In reviewing the development proposal, the maxim= allowed units on the site at the 3-6 dwelling units per acre would be 58.5. The applicant is proposing 60 and the overall density of the development is 6.25 units per acre vs. the 6 units per acre allowed in the Planned Development zoning. The applicant is proposing to develop five 4 -unit condominium buildings, two 8 -unit condominium buildings and two 12 -unit condominium buildings for a total of 60 dwell- ing outs. The site is Bordered on the west, north and east by proposed park land and on the south by Wilderness Run Road. Enclosed is a copy of the land use in the Planned Development agreement for your reference. . The site has a substantial amount of topographic relief as mentioned by the Engi- neering Report. This site also is wooded in certain areas so the design has been laid out in accordance with the topography and to preserve as many of the natural trees as possible. The applicant is proposing to provide access to this site from Wilderness Run Road. As mentioned above, park is surrounding all three sides of the development proposal. Therefore, there is no need to provide through access or continuity to other parcels of land adjacent to this development proposal. Therefore, the applicant is providing access to this site by private drives to M CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - OA MM HEIGHTS MMA CH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO provide his own overall circulation for this particular parcel. The applicant is proposing a loop street through the southern portion of the site which will pro- vide access to 48 dwelling units. 'There is also a private drive running to the northern portion of this site which will provide access to the 12 northerly units. Therefore, circulation in this plat is quite good although they are proposed to be private streets. The proposed development consists of 60 dwelling units and has a lot coverage of 18.4%. These densities were calculated not deducting the private street area. The private streets, if dedicated, would consist of approximately 2.2 acres and would allow a maximum of 57 dwelling units if calculated at the R-3 density, or 45 dwelling units, if calculated at 6 units an acre at the net density. The applicant is proposing to provide one garage space and 75 open parking spaces for a total of 2.25 parking spaces per unit. As you are aware, the Coartission will be looking at the ordinance requirement to reduce the parking spaces fran 2.5 to 2 parking spaces per unit in multiple dwellings. Therefore, the applicant will be above the minimum parking req,irpm....nts for the new ordinance. In reviewing the setbacks, it appears all setbacks are met between dwelling units and garage spaces with the exception there should be a 40' setback along Wilder- ness Run Road. Three of the four -unit buildings will have to be shifted to meet this 40' setback requirement. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) A development agreement shall be oanpleted prior to the construction of any of the dwelling units. 2) A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 3) The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowner's Associa- tion bylaws for review. 4) The park dedication has been satisfied with the Lexington South Planned De- velopment. However, the tot lot provision shall be reviewed by the Advi- sory Park Cacmittee for their recomiendations. 5) A 40' setback for all buildings shall be required from Wilderness Run Road. 6) All other City ordinances shall be applicable for the overall development. ENGINEERING RFX.'OIMENDATIGNS 7) An 80' right-of-way should be dedicated for Wilderness Run Road in confor- mance with the existing street and utility easement adjacent to this plat. 8) Internal private drives shall be a minumun 28' in width constructed to a 7 -ton design with concrete curb and gutter. M 0 • CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PIAT - OAKWOOD HEIGHTS MkRCH 23, 1982 PAGE THREE 9) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall'be submitted and approved by the City prior to final plat approval. 10) If installed privately, the utility layout and design shall he as approved by the City. 11) Trunk area stone sewer assessments shall be paid as a condition of final plat approval. 12) A 10' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all boundaries of this proposed plat. TAC/jach 70 0 0 TO: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKIE, CITY PLANNER FROM: TfK)MA,.S A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 18, 1982 RE: PRELLMnkRY PLAT - OAKWOOD HEIGHTS (COUNTRYSIDE BUILDERS INC) The Public Works Department has the following information for consideration of approval for the above -referenced plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water of sufficient size and capacity to service this proposed development was installed under Project 241 within Wilderness Run Road. Lateral extensions frau these trunk utilities will have to be in- stalled through this development to provide individual services. Access to this proposed development will be provided by way of Wilderness Run Road which is presently being constructed under Contract 81-14 (Pro- ject 345). Access throughout the plat is proposed by way of an internal private drive with two points of access onto Wilderness Run Road. Access to the garage units located on the northern portion of this plat adjacent to the Highline Trail would be provided by way of a 650' private drive with a maxim= slope of 8%. Because of the existing topography, there is no practical way to have this private road looped with the other internal road and still be able to maintain a maximum of 8% grade. All private roads within this plat should have a minimum width of 28'. kZvoln"emek,/ 1•• 1 •N There is a 50' differential from the northern end of this plat adjacent to the Highline Trail down to Wilderness Run Road. Storm sewer laterals are Presently being constructed within Wilderness Run Road from which exten- sions can be constructed to provide ,the required internal drainage. Be- cause of this deep topography, extensive erosion control measures will have to be implementedadjacent to Wilderness Run Road. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY While the City has obtained an 80' roadway and utility easement for Wild- erness Run Road, it is recommended that this entire 80' easement be in- corporated as a part of this plat and dedicated as public right-of-way in lieu of the 40' half right-of-way proposed with this plat. All other util- ity easements necessary to provide sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer service will have to be dedicated based on the alignment of final detailed plans and specifications. If not dedicated with the final plat, it will have to be incorporated through a separate utility easement description to be dedicated to the City at a later date. A typical 10' drainage and utility easement should be dedicated adjacent to all boundaries of this plat. i1 0 CITY OF EAGAN OAKVCM.HEIGHTS - ENGINEERING REPORT MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO 0 Trunk area sanitary sewer and water assessments have been levied along with lateral benefit from trunk utilities within Wilderness Run Road under Pro- ject 241 previously. The only additional assessments that would be the responsibility of this proposed subdivision would be the trunk area storm sewer and any assessments associated with the internal streets and/or utili- ties if installed under a City contract. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect of this report at the Planning Commission Meeting of March 23, 1982. Respectfull submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jack _7Z '41� i. PRELIMINARY PLAT OFI OAKWOOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS iy N ur m _ eeWl•nelr.aun+. W Pr rl ru ru uu / _ Wu� W u .r Yrr �.1�411. Y� 11. Yr WU. uwuu •uuw u Vuw Y1� YI�.VIu.w u :.uw.Yr IYII �: •I r. r�ruu Ilrs 1.1 yyl4�rulrr1Y11. IY..rrl�4 rvpu I.1 Ir.yV P lur M 1 Wr'r 1' . W' rwxV wr. uuir Y� "'1 —. I Yr w� Ilu w .r Wu 1 W. r��r�uu oz jaajtaat SNua 3g� �� Y 06W LOCATION MAP I egr a •�ctVYY. Y � , �•• J_Ts' QY� , r��r�uu oz jaajtaat SNua 3g� �� Y 06W C'T'. nam p SITE PLAN t ^_I .-Ie' ler, 1 ...Ir r rr SITE EWx GENERAL NOTES L 1a t ewa tw+ f4-R.fK .YN L. ELv ane u E ..l E nwouw n ur t dw nexfx\ elruLEx ftIIIIEVV uvo wd aYtm.u.\ u fx., • dwcufwn eLrueLx edvd.ws uL fes Wawa\ IS .fW �TAwuW\r MLx {O*OnM wWe\f fx[x VAr .pA. C4L w+I . 1.1y fro\ bdfplKNSI NAGS YLf1YKVN. rul :BITE INFORMATION! SITE ala Ln.SSl \an S." E:u\ W.I. eau mww L'It Vwr LOY{Own Ww\N wnf f a ..ITLOVOruxNw\ -LO VMrf l a mm l wm,Na s -11. YWrf rOT4- 4e YxIT, . Its wT wL Yn WR SIZE, N f emrmw ♦ Ymn Z eeoaoxw um art -1e YxIrf t seorcdw b Yw11L T ST... um o,Y - u 1+ torp -b Yw ft.. AT LESfTEuf rta wn . IS II.. wECL 1unx4 .u\ m WEll Aaxw .w\ )T Alt1uG 1S f+w.\ rmx m frxw EoxuLn uE[wun urxauw A _ Tm LOT O � I E Rxn . Yxn I 1xxT { VxITE W."L r4xnxr J= % p SITE PLAN t ^_I .-Ie' ler, 1 ...Ir r rr SITE EWx GENERAL NOTES L 1a t ewa tw+ f4-R.fK .YN L. ELv ane u E ..l E nwouw n ur t dw nexfx\ elruLEx ftIIIIEVV uvo wd aYtm.u.\ u fx., • dwcufwn eLrueLx edvd.ws uL fes Wawa\ IS .fW �TAwuW\r MLx {O*OnM wWe\f fx[x VAr .pA. C4L w+I . 1.1y fro\ bdfplKNSI NAGS YLf1YKVN. rul :BITE INFORMATION! SITE ala Ln.SSl \an S." E:u\ W.I. eau mww L'It Vwr LOY{Own Ww\N wnf f a ..ITLOVOruxNw\ -LO VMrf l a mm l wm,Na s -11. YWrf rOT4- 4e YxIT, . Its wT wL Yn WR SIZE, N f emrmw ♦ Ymn Z eeoaoxw um art -1e YxIrf t seorcdw b Yw11L T ST... um o,Y - u 1+ torp -b Yw ft.. AT LESfTEuf rta wn . IS II.. wECL 1unx4 .u\ m WEll Aaxw .w\ )T Alt1uG 1S f+w.\ rmx m frxw 4 Unit Building Front Elevation V.." Talented INIMENG 8 Unit Building Front Eta atlonj m 12 Unit Building Front Elevation "..W Side Elevation Side Elevation i Side El y.. '..W Sect. At Balcony SNININOGNOO S1H•JI3H OOOMMtlO u LANDSCAPE PLAN MC3= mmcm mmm =330 mmcm � ffi��Wm ti A tel, -o _ - - -__ •L� `I�_ �,,��1,�� c {0. +- No I= SUNNI& NN Ml Ml �'ri� / 4 •S• � r. \. mss' �, - t.:•. nunlnutnnluuiniuuiiyu�inuuitt�ytlt• f4tttiintlmtut ., unnnunnt�iunFu�itiFnnunnnuu pie MOW bb P p -R41 Eo R-11 R-1 tB > /i= VALL—E R-11 R-11 X� —R—I 711 p ,0 rA..Mrs. GB Hlu. In COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT' Ind Ind' �WB p4ill /Ind. -G —R—I 711 p yL `•y' • A PF r _ . R, -T R F I W V1 NT.��e81if3Y • . .rim c'I // 0 • TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMIN FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: APRIL 16, 1982 RE: UPDATE CN OAKWOOD HEIGHTS CONDCMINIUMS On March 23, 1982, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing for Oakwood Heights Condominium development proposal. The Advisory Plan- ning Commission reoommended approval with the understanding that the devel- oper would reduce the density from 60 dwelling units to 55 dwelling units. Enclosed is a revised site plan indicating where the 5 dwelling unit reduc- tion has been made. The last item regarding this staff report is to bring to your attention the paragraph in regard to zoning and land use. Staff has indicated that the planned development is presently zoned R-2 and has a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. This area in the Comprehensive Guide Plan is also designated R -II which indicates a land use proposed at 3 units per acre. The applicant in developing this particular site has proposed a townhouse development proposal. When looking at Ordinance 52, Zoning or- dinance.in regard to townhouse development, the density allowed for town- houses is 6,000 square feet per unit, or 7.26 dwelling units per net acre. So, there is inconsistency between the density allowed in an R-2 PD with a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre vs. the townhouse development ser tion in the Zoning Ordinance which allows 7.26 units per net acre. This situation has come up before and hopefully staff can get direction from the City as to how the City would want to treat the inconsistency between a planned development zoning with 3-6 dwelling units per acre and the town- house zoning which would allow 7.26 units per acre on a net area. In reviewing this development proposal, because of the inconsistency be- tween an R-2 planned development and R -II, 3-6 dwelling units per acre pro- posed for land use and the townhouse density in the Zoning Ordinance which allows 7.26 dwelling units per acre, staff has a suggestion they would like to pass on for consideration. This suggestion would be amending Ordinance 52 in regard to the R-3 zoning classification. Instead of allowing a maxi - nun density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre on a net basis in an R-3 Dis- trict, that the R-3 District be reduced in density to a maxim= of 6 dwell- ing units per acre. There could be a subcategory in the R-3 District as an R -3A which would address townhouse or condominium units which have two common walls. Where buildings have two common walls, the land area used by development is less such as a quadramminiumu complex than compared to a townhouse or row house where there are not always two cannon walls. So, the R -3A category could have a maximuan of 6,000 square feet per unit or 7.26 dwelling units per acre. The third category in the R-3 District would be R -3B which would take into account the new buildings which have r:ome on the market which are the 8 -unit coach homes or condominiun unit. The 8-plex is really the stacking of two 4-plexes and the 8-plex does not really fit into an R-4, Residential Multiple District, or an R-3, Town- house District. Staff is suggesting that a new designation of R -3B be a Thomas L. Hedges Update on Oakwood Heights Condaniniums April 16; 1982 Page two set up to address the 8-plex dwelling units which have just recently cane into the marketplace. If the City would like to investigate the possibilities of splitting the R-3 District into sub -categories and allowing different units in each Dis- trict, staff can work on a proposed amendment describing the type of units that would be allowed in each of the subheadings plus a density that could work for each of the subheadings. At the present time, staff has not thor- oughly investigated this concept, but if there is favorable discussion in regard to this concept, staff would be glad to research this new proposal. If anyone has any additional caunpnts or questions regarding this subdivi- sion of a zoning classification, staff would be glad to address this item at the April 20, 1982 City Council meeting. DCR/jach W. FOND C IL SITE FLAN • I...' V— C)ML N 64 as 0 E 41170 WK . I." AWES WILDING OREARIUNN 2 -ID UNN W.M.INUMS 40 UrYq E -E UNIT CeY00NWNME Ib IWNE ♦-s UNIT L...MIYryMS 1Y Owl 1-3UNR CmpoNlNllMlf ] UNITS TOTAL — SS UNITS . 5.14 UNITS PE. ALOE UNIT OIIEAE W.m 5 CEOW0` 6 UNITS Z eEp/GeN WIN CVT -4 INN] E 5-0—H 25 UNITS 1 EEpNWM WIN MN—6 UNITS TOM 55 U.Irs YAREING AT 2.25 STALLS RE WIT . ITA STALLS MREING rROIMEO GAEAOfi MAAING 64 SrNiS DAWE NAY YAECING Y♦ ST.LLLS GUEST YAREMG Tl STALLS TOM � 160 STALLS APC Minutes March 23, 1982 OAKWOOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS - PRELIMINARY PLAT The application of Countryside Builders and Jerry Lagro for preliminary plat approval of Oakwood Heights Condominiums consisting of 9.95 acres and 60 condominium dwelling units was then considered by the Council. Mr. Darrel Anderson, architect, and Mr. Lagro were present. The project would consist of 12 different unit plans and three building types on a very rough parcel of property north of Wilderness Run Road in a portion of the Lexington South Planned Development. Mr. Anderson indicated that the developer would attempt to save as many oak trees as possible, that a tot lot would be provided, that a private street would be provided on the north, there would be two spaces per unit for parking and additional guest parking would be available. He re- quested the increase in density to 64 units, but indicated that he misunder- stood the density requirements under the ordinance, basing that request on 6,000 square feet per unit. The units would be 800 to 1,300 square feet in size and there would be a minimum 40 foot setback along Wilderness Run Road. It was noted that in order to comply with the ordinance requirements, that it would be necessary to reduce the density to approximately 57.5 dwelling units in the area zoned planned development, allowing 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre. If the streets are all public, it would also reduce the acreage by about 2 additional acres for computation of density. The prices would range from $58,000.00 to $82,000.00 per unit. It was noted that lower density generally is provided around the area, except to the east. Mr. Anderson indicated that the developer would comply with the density requirements of the City. McCrea moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following: 1. That density not exceed 55 units in the project. 2. A development agreement shall be completed prior to the construction of any of the dwelling units. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not re- leased until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 4. The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowner's Association Articles and Bylaws for review. 5. The park dedication has been satisfied with the Lexington South Planned Development. However, a tot lot shall be included and its plan shall be reviewed by the Advisory Park Committee for its recommendations. 6. A 40 foot setback for all buildings shall be required from Wilder- ness Run Road. 7. All other City ordinances shall be applicable for the overall development. 84 6 0 APC Minutes March 23, 1982 8. An 80 foot right-of-way should be dedicated for Wilderness Run Road in conformance with the existing street and utility easement adjacent to this plat. 9. Internal private drives shall be a minimum 28 feet in width con- structed to a 7 -ton design with concrete curb and gutter. 10. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to final plat approval. 11. If installed privately, the utility layout and design shall be as approved by the City. 12. Trunk area storm sewer assessments shall be paid as a condition of final plat approval. 13. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all lot boundaries in this proposed plat. Those in favor were McCrea, Turnham, Wilkins and Hall. Those against were Bohne, Brob and Wold. Those voting no were concerned about the density being too high on the parcel of property. It was suggested by Planning Commission members that the staff review a potential reduction of 2 units in the buildings facing the pond on the east. 65 9 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Nineteen PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS D. Midwestern Associates, Orrin Aune, for Preliminary Plat, Lone Oak Heights, Consisting of Approximately 14 Acres -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting on March 23, 1982, to consider an application for a preliminary plat of Lone Oak Heights consisting of approxi- mately 14.09 acres and containing 125 dwelling units. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the Lone Oak Heights preliminary plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report. There is a lengthy discussion regarding the preliminary plat that was originally submitted to the APC and the concerns were discussed that the City Council had when they denied the original application. For additional information on this item, refer to the planning assistant's report enclosed on pages 1_ through 1bFor additional information regarding the action that was to en y the APC, refer to pages JD S through 106 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC to approve the Lone Oak Heights prelimi- nary plat. 1961 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - LCNE OAK HEIGHTS APPLICANT: MIDWESTERN ASSOCIATES - ORRIN AUNE LOCATION: NE; OF THE NE; OF SECTION 9 EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) WITH R-3 (RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE AND R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE) UNDERLYING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 17, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVID M. OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for preliminary plat approval of Lone Oak Heights, which consists of approximately 14.09 acres and contains 125 dwelling units. ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently, the parcel is zoned R-3 (Residential Townhouse) and R-4 (Residential Multiple) with a PD (Planned Developnent) zoning overlaying the entire parcel. The land use guide designates the 14 -acre parcel as an R-3 land use (Mixed Residential) with a density of 6-12 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development will consist of approximately 10.1 dwelling units per acre which is consistent with the Land Use Guide Plan. BACKGROUND: As you may recall, a public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the September 22, 1981 meeting to consider a preliminary plat for Lone Oak Heights. The APC recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to several conditions. The City Council discussed the preliminary plat application for Ione Oak Heights at the October 20, 1981 meeting. In order to study the potential costs of dawn -zoning the subject parcel, the City Council con- tinued the preliminary plat application until the study could be cmgileted. After reviewing the down -zoning study and after considerable discussion, the City Coun- cil denied the preliminary plat for Ione Oak Heights at the January 19, 1982 meet- ing. The reasons for denial were: 1) The proposed north/south road (Shield's Lane) was too close to Pilot Knob School as it ran directly along the east boundary of the school. 2) The proposed plat exceeded the allowable lot coverage by .98. The R-4 area lot coverage was at 20.9% and the ordinance allows 20%. 3) The proposal for parking for the overall development was less than the 2.5 spaces per unit requirement.' The applicant is proposing to develop the parcel with condominiums and town- houses and guadraminium5. The proposed plan will consist of 2 condominium build- ings with 36 dwelling units each, 33 townhouses and 20 quadraminium dwelling units. $'7 CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO As stated earlier, the parcel is divided into two areas according to the zoning. The R-3 parcel consists of 7.5 net acres and would allow 54 dwelling units. The developer is proposing to develop 53 dwelling units in the R-3 parcel for a total of 7 dwelling units per acre. The R-4 parcel consists of 4.7 net acres with a density determined on a sliding scale. The two condaninium buildings will be 3 stories and contain 36 one -bedroom units and 36 two-bedroom.units. The zoning ordinance would require 194,400 square feet with a mix of bedrooms as proposed. The net area of the R-4 parcel is 206,944 square feet which is 12,544 square feet over the zoning ordinance requirement. Be- low is a density chart describing each of the parcels. PARCEL ACRES LOT DWELLING DWG.UNITS PROPOSED REQUIRED USE COVERAGE UNITS ALLOWED PARKING PARKING Condominiums 4.7 12.6% 72 180 180 Townhouses 7.5 17.68 53 54 132.5 132.5 Parcel No. 1 - Condaninium Apartments - The applicant is proposing two 36 -unit condominium buildings. Each of the condominium buildings is 26,260 square feet in size. The net area of the R-4 parcel is 206,994 square feet. The lot coverage of the two condominium buildings is 12.69% which is under the 20% allowable cover- age requirement. There are 72 dwelling units on the R-4 parcel which is 4.7 net acres which equals 15.1 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing un- derground garages for the covered parking space requirements. These will be 1.5 Open parking spaces per dwelling unit which meets the present requirement. If the City feels two parking spaces per dwelling unit is sufficient, the applicant would be agreeable to such a plan. All setback requirements have been met for the condominium buildings. Patcel No. 2 - Townhouse Development - Parcel 2 is proposed to be constructed with 20 quadraminium dwelling units and 33 townhouse dwelling units. The required site area for the 53 dwelling units is 318,000 square feet and the applicant is pro- viding 328,829 square feet. Therefore, the applicant is providing an additional 10,829 square feet of area in the R-3 parcel. The 33 townhouse units and 20 quad- raminium units have a total building area of 57,752 square feet which is 17.6% of the total area provided in the R-3 parcel. The 53 dwelling units are located on the 7.5 net acres of the R-3 parcel which equals 7 dwelling units per acre. The access to the property will be from Lone Oak Road on the north and Towerview Drive on the south. The applicant is proposing a 60' wide public street to run north/ south through the development. As stated earlier, one of the reasons the City Council turned dawn the original preliminary plat for Lone Oak Heights was due to the fact that this proposed north/south road (Shield's Lane) was too close to the Pilot Knob School. In an effort to meet the City Council requirements, the devel- oper has relocated the road away from the school and centered on the property. 04 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE THREE There are still some questions regarding the gas main which crosses the norther- ly portion of the property: Staff has been contacted by a representative from Northern States Power, and they would like this preliminary plat to be subject to the relocation of the gasline easement to the satisfaction of Northern States Power. The southwest portion of the plat abuts Pilot Knob Park. The northerly portion of the plat abuts Pilot Knob School. Therefore, there is open space immediately to the west to provide the park needs. It is staff's understanding that the applicant has dedicated the land for Pilot Knob Park. Therefore, there will be no park dedication for this proposed development. However, staff is requesting that there be a trail connection from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School some- where between the condominium project and the townhouse development. The appli- cant shall also provide one tot lot to provide the needs for the pre-schoolers within this development proposal. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) If the site plan is approved, the gas main shall be relocated as to not interfere with any of the proposed buildings and also to the satisfaction of the Northern States Power Company. 2) The plat should be subject to all easements as required by City staff. 3) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City staff. 4) A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not released until one year after the landscaping has been conpleted. 5) The developer shall provide a tot lot for the proposed pre-schoolers with- in the development. 6) The developer shall construct a trail from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School between the condominiiun and townhouse developrent. 7) The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowner's Asso- ciation bylaws for City review. 8) A development agreement and planned development agreement shall be approved prior to the final plat application. 9) The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Ccrmission since the plat abuts two County roads. nmo/jack Sy CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - IC)NE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE FOUR ENGINEERING RECCD4MEN MATIONS 10) A 10' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public right-of-way and along the west boundary line. In addition, drainage and utility easements incorporating the internal utilities re- quired to servioe this development shall be dedicated as a part of the final plat. 11) The internal private road shall be constructed to a 28' minimum width with concrete curb and gutter to City approved plans and specifications. 12) Previously deferred trunk area water assessments and lateral benefit from trunk water main shall be assumed by this development as a oondi- tion of final plat approval. 13) A 30' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Toaerview Road. 14) Towerview Road shall be ordered for improvement prior to final plat approval. TAC/jach L 0 0 70: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COPM4ISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: MARCH 18, 1982 I RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS ADDITION (MIDWESTERN ASSOCIATES) The Public Works Department has the following oomrents to offer for consid- eration of the above -referenced plat: UTILITIES Sanitary surer of sufficient size and elevation is available by way of the recent extension of the sanitary sewer from the east side of Pilot Knob Road under Project 347 in 1981. Water service is available frau the existing 12" trunk water main on Lone Oak Road and the existing 12" trunk water main on Towerview Road. An internal water lateral connecting these two trunks through this plat will provide the internal water service of sufficient pressure and capacity to handle this proposal. The general topography of this property slopes from the north and south to- wards the middle of this plat where there presently exists a 24" trunk storm sewer. This storm sewer has sufficient capacity to handle the anticipated drainage from this proposed development. The internal laterals and catch basins will be required to convey the drainage to this tank facility. Y: X*b- Access to this proposed development will be provided by an internal public street connecting Lone Oak Road with Towerview Road. Lone Oak Road was re- cently upgraded to its final design standard as a part of the Pilot Knob Rd. upgrading in 1981. However, Towerview Road presently exists as a substan- dard gravel road providing access to the Univac water reservoir. Towerview Road will have to be upgraded to the City standards from Pilot Knob Road to the west boundary of the park property adjacent to this development as a condition of this plat. This upgraded road will provide the acess to this plat and Sperry Univac's addition which is presently under construction. The developer is proposing to service the townhouse units adjacent to Pilot Knob Road by way of an internal looped private drive. This private road should be constructed to a minimum width of 28' with concrete curb and gut- ter to a 5 -ton design. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY Sufficient right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road and Lone Oak Road has been pre- viously acquired by the County in conjunction with the recent upgrading in 1981. A 30' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Towarview Road adja- cent to the southern boundary of this plat. The internal public road shall be provided by way of a 60' public dedication of road right-of-way. Typical 91 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN ENGINEERING REPORT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO 10' drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated adjacent to all private property and public right-of-way adjacent to or within this peat. Internal drainage and utility easements must be dedicated to provide for the installa- tion of public utilities to service this development. The exact location will be defined at the time of detailed plans and specification preparation. The location of the proposed westerly condominium facility requires the relo- cation of the existing Northern States Power gasline easement. This relocation shall be in conformance with NSP requirements. k� u5i-2TUR- The following outstanding assessments will be the responsibility of this de- velopment as a condition of final plat approval. They are calculated in ac- cordance with the 1982 rates. However, they shall be levied at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 1) Trunk area water assessment (defenrent from 1976) at $995/acre 13,631.50 2) Lateral benefit from trunk water main (Towerview Rd) at $18/ft. 10,362.60 TOTAL: $23,994.10 There are presently several pending assessments associated with the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road pertaining to street improvements and/or trunk storm sewer costs under Projects 200 and 177 respectively. All costs associated with the internal distribution of streets and/or utilities will be the responsibility of this subdivision. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect of this report at the Planning Comaissicn Meeting of March 23, 1982. Respectfully submitted, oot�� A -d Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public works TAC/jack 9a. Q nl Engineers Land surveyors • • Planners /alley Engineering Co., Inc. Telephone 447-2570 Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 J LONE OAK HEIGHTS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CITY OF EAGAN OWNER/DEVELOPER: Midwestern Associates, 8337 Delaney Circle, Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota. 55075 Telephone: 459-7120 (Orin Aune) CONSULTANT: Valley Engineering Company, Inc., Ron Swanson/Steve Harvey, P.O. Box 478, Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372, Telephone: 447-2570 PROPERTY LOCATION: The proposed project is located in the Southwest Quadrant of Lone Oak Road (Co. Rd. No. 26) and Pilot Knob Road (Co. Rd. No. 31). PROPOSAL: The site is presently zoned PD (Planned Development) with an underlying zoning of R-3 (Residential Townhouse District) and R-4 (Residential Multiple District). The city land use guide designates the site as R-3 land use (Mixed Residential) with a density of 6-12 dwelling units per acre. The request is presently submitted with 125 dwelling units on 12.30 net acres giving an over all density of 10.2 dwelling units per acre which is consistent with the land use guide plan. GENERAL: Lone Oak Heights was before the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission for a public hearing on September 22nd, 1981. The project was given preliminary approval at the time subject to several conditions. Following the Planning Commission approval there were several meetings before the Eagan City Council. On January 19th, 1982 at a regular meeting of the Eagan City Council the project was turned down for the following stated reasons. 1. The proposed north -south road (Shields Lane) was too close to Pilot Knob School (the road on the original submittal ran along the east boundary of the school). It was agreed that the road should be a through street between Towerview and Lone Oak. W LONE OAK HEIGHTS • • page 2 2. The proposed plat exceeded the allowable lot coverage by .9% i.e. the R-4 area lot coverage was at 20.9% and the ordinance allows 20%. As shown on the herein contained site data sheets the revised proposal has met or exceeded all of the lot area, coverage and density requirements as set forth in City Ordinance No. 52. The road has also been relocated away from the school and centered on the property. This meets the Council requirements and also is in harmony with the Dakota County requirements as set forth in the attached letter. (see Exhibit "A" attached hereto). DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES: It is the intent of the Developer to develop the PD in phases beginning with the most northerly condominium building as Phase I and the quadraminium units as Phase II anticipating an absorption rate of 40 to 45 dwelling units per year. The estimated price range of the units could be $40,000 to $50,000 and would be sold in fee as individual units with two separate Home Owners Associations, one for the condominium units and one the townhouse quadraminium units, It is the intent of the Developer to provide the required landscaping, screening, etc., and to use construction materials in conjunction with architecturally designed facades for a pleasing visual effect. Each townhouse and quadraminium lot could have its own designed landscape plan consistent with its building type. All parking would be paved and non -landscaped areas would be sodded. The. proposed minimmi set. -Leaks are consitent with the zoning ordinances for the total site. Financing for the PD would be through conventional methods and FHA and GI Guaranteed Home Loan programs through Banco Corp. The Developers Financial capabilities can be verified by personal statements and/or conformation from the Developers bank if required. CIRCULATION/POPULATION• The proposed PD will have excellent access to both county and state highways. - The toal site will have vehicular access to Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road via the proposed north south collocter street (Shields Lane) and Towerview Road as shown on the proposed plat. Pilot Knob Road has been upgraded to provide access to the proposed interstate 35E and 494 intersection. At present there is a city park adjacent to the southwestern boundary of the site and an elementary school on the northwestern boundary. The proposed PD provides for a walkway access to carry the present and future pedestrian traffic from Pilot Knob Road to the western boundary. It has been estimated that the population of the PD will be 342 of which 41 will be school age children. W. LANE OAK IIEIG11TS • • page 3 LANE OAK HEIGHT'S, EAGAN, MINNESOTA SITE DATA SELEET TOTAL PLAT AREA = 104,400 Sq. Ft. 36 - 2 - Bedroom units @ 3,100 Sq. Ft. - 111,600 Gross Area = 630,710.2 Sq. Ft. = 14.479 Ac. + Less Shields Lane _ -21,600 Sq Ft R/W = 77,257.7 Sq. Ft. _ -1.7.74 Ac. + Less Towerview R/W 17,629.4 Sq. Ft. _ -0.405 Ac + Net Total Plat Area 535,823.1 Sq. Ft. = 12.300 Ac. + R-4 AREA, DENSITY AND LOT COVERAGE Gross R-4 Area = 244,820.7 Sq. Ft. = 5.620 Ac. + Less Shields Lane RAW = -37,826.6 Sq. Ft. _ -0.868 Ac + Net R-4 Area = 206,994.1 Sq. Ft. = 4.752 Ac. + 36 - 1 - Bedroom units @ 2,900 Sq. Ft. = 104,400 Sq. Ft. 36 - 2 - Bedroom units @ 3,100 Sq. Ft. - 111,600 Sq. Ft. Less credit for underground parking (per ordinance) (72 x 300) _ -21,600 Sq Ft Net R-4 Area required = - 194,400 Sq. Ft. Net R-4 Area Provided = 206,944 Sq. Ft. * Proposed R-4 is 948 of allowable density PARKING REQUIREMENTS PER ORD. Required 2.5 per unit = 72 x 2.5 = 180 Parking stalls Provided = 72 Garages 108 Parkinq Stalls Total Provided on plan QS 180 Parking units LANE OAK tIEIarrs • • page 4 COVERAGE FOR PROPOSED R-4 2 Buildings @ 202 x 65 = 26,260 Sq. Ft./206,994 Sq. Ft. = 12.698 Allowable Coverage = :.0.008 DENSITY 72 Du/4.752 net acres = 15.15 Dwelling units per acre R-3 AREA, DENSITY AND IAT COVERAGE Gross R-3 Area = 385,889.5 Sq. Ft. = 8.859 Acres + Less Shields Lane R/W = 39,431.1 Sq. Ft. _ -0.905 Acres + Less Towerview R/W = 17 629.4 Sq. Ft = -0.405 Acres + Net P,-3 Area = 328,829 Sq. Ft. = 7.549 Acres + PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS AND AREA REQUIREMENTS Quadraminium Units 20 Townhouse Units = 33 Net Proposed Dwelling Units = 53 Total Area Required by Ord. = 53 x 6000 Sq. Ft. = 318,000 Sq. Ft. Total Area Provided = 328,829 Sq. Ft. Proposed R-3 is 96.78 of allowable density or 54.8 D.U. allowed. COVERAGE FOR PROPOSED R-3 33 Townhouse units Building area = 39,272 Sq. Ft. 20 Quadraminium unit Building Area = 18,480 Sq. Ft. Total Building Area = 57,752 Sq. Ft. R-3 Lot coverage = 57,752 Sq. Ft./328,829 Sq. Ft. = 17.68 Allowable Coverage = 20.08 Density 53 Du/7.549 net acres = 7.02 dwelling units per acre 96 0 0 WN o Ln II I q .05 51 1P ".+'1'7•!, Ch e_i 46 •FO: WNE OAK HEIGHM • • page 6 OFSCRIMcbm VCP PFCPMM PUS 1'he •�,rthraast '?Carter ^.f Che wnrvaast ?l.L-tom of ,i¢uor. 9, :bunsr_p 27, P.vge 21, Dakota c�Jry, 'L nCyta es.OL•pt tar, ChLrClT [re !Ol'OVllq: 1 1. - x FAM of Cie brLhmst %1 rte, (`M 1/4. of LY `brtaast garter 00: 1/4) Of Seata= 9itr M. 7�..+3P (27;, Pange :`.en-i-L`_ee 1211. par lc.larly ieserlLsd as foul -: BTR" "LAR at L^.e L':.arsectlw' of the .E45t 1Lb Of 0SL'Jld i LMherline Pildmion as Oldt`ed and he rcrh Ise of s¢tlon N. , (91, T7rship :`Je7ri-selsan (271. Page twenty -throe (211; thence SouCl a:0a3 sail E.ut lire a !"canoe Of !60 feet to a mint on sail lire: tk t ?Aat a'urq a lire parallel to LY north 1Lne of read S¢r..., a distance of 959 feet to a poilt: the.'noe .•orth along a line parallel to the east lib 9f !§L'urd TL-nherlire AGdl On m lecr� s 1:sta.'nre 1! 560 !tie m a mine On V.a Nath line of sad Section vine (9); thetce West aLOnq •le 'lort. 1 Lne Of saw Soction (9) a dstance of 959 feet to the place Oi beginning. 2. mat part of the'brtasst ?tarter. ( !'_-e;C a. !esQahnd as follows: L'4) of Section 9. lbwctsRlP 27, Pange 23, (lalota County, :ore+er:� at h NO2b.lst corner of h xn-heast 7LL a (%T. 1/6) of L4 !10_2^^else 4: of 3h- 'Cn 9: tnen0e SaaLh ,O !ewes :2 -_rtes .2 seconds Vest (for the pi= -poses of _.e `ort`. 1 e of Lhe'or-:�ast !`Z 1;'4: of Lha ,' 1: J'. v;! 5 aticn 9 Fes sr. ssnrec Saar Lr, O: -; = 39 .!e es fe53 :i-a:tes 20 seeds East , to Lb b..= :"nc C. the bre.`. f60.00 feet Of sa:c 'for-1a"t [.Carter i'$ 1/4) Of Lhe'i.^_heast -- tar ,!` .. 4• , L nal%' beL-R the poll Of �L'�,L-( Jf the Land t0 he dewcribed; the'te cont. - .+s _`• '-c,r� 02 .i'a:tes 12 se rds +est 5 the South lane Of said :or -:east tar 'L L/1 Jf Ca 'or-. est _Latter lsE 1/41 : Lhe.'ce Easter'y along the Stitlt line of said !or_mse. 21u. ;%T. ;'4: of the 47R7Baat a_ - (SE 1:41 a dista:noe of 666.61 Leet; thence north 0 :earees C2 -,[antes C] seconds East m the SOC. lib of the Notch 66C.00 feet of rain !ortteast ?-l^.eh :!S L6) of the !orhmstr%E L'/1: thence Westerly along the South 1Lne ebrtr 660.00 feet Of said ;orthmvt purer !!E 1/4) of the NorthOaat OL-iteer AT. 1/41 W _A Point of hrl ll21;, 7. :'hat a= Of the no= - t quarter Of Che northeast aura- of Section 9. Tc~.ip 27, Pa -3e 23, Caota SO_.c/, 4:' SOU, lying south of t+* north. 13.00 Leet LhermL s6•ich Lin east of Line I aril went Of Line 2 de sQ iEed as follows: Line L " a line 55.00 feet .est of " rnmsured at rivet a:glm m and parallel nnth, the dm[bed 1Lne. Be9+nnuq at the norta.wmt corner of said Sean 10: hence south 4�Mrq the west lib of said sedan 10 a listiice cf 462.39 feet; tteree alenq a -aN,-tial =--e no Lb right, tiavi.n7 a central a-q'e of 1 teree N �.L-ntes 00 seconds and a mngmt 1:,.: feet, a dSta:e c[ 2::'.f feet: LhG7Q scutleily tangmc m h fast dere: !Sed :_:era iia -�-ae Of :59.13 feet: Lnence Alt.= a rar,ent:al Curve to the left. cawing a certraL a'y'e of ' 1e :m OC ai_tm 00 s®nds are a ta'gent of L00.00 feet, a distance of 2:0.0[ feet: Lhe-:a southerly ".-Rent o the last fesCr Lhed nava a distance of 200.00 Leet [here ten: _rata. -R. line 2 ins s lona ]]. _ es feet .t of, AS omsu_-ec at right angles to and Parallel with, a Lane 1rr. - f -'7e a vc= W. Che nOr�. ." of C`e .['Laos[ � •,fret Of Still 10, :br. S'niF 27, Page 2/, 3ni3ta Cao:_!, :i7res-tat distant 9.90 feet east of Che mrt:4wmt cotter thereof to s Pent On L`e south line Of Lha nort:swmt gdrrr of thecor'srst quarrsr oC sand Sectlw Sis-s-.e . 70 fat out of Che southwest to Lh Wf. -CLhe w;L`. the south 22.00 fat of L`e vLh 55.^C Lat of the :orhmst quur of the :or_hmst ACL' -! SA -.d Sat �Cn i 1J1C� -.25 'RSC of the i':r9-fit:omd LLb 1 a'�d east Of the lest '.:9.0. feet c! Lhe ncrheast ^ ,• er of h nort:east of seat- Section. 9. J. `:at lar- of C'a :S ','4 Of the [S L7 0t sect -.In 9. ---P..!p 21. P.Vne 23 ly: q north are asst .f 9r-er'L;on s l !ve ol! risl:uo!+ay for :pro 31R load And ?:lot Ic'oo Poall . El V February 1, 1982 • 0 DAKOTA I' II I'NT Y 'DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 HWY. 55. HASTINGS. MINNESOTA S!O]] EXHI Bl T 'q" Mr. Orin Aune Midwestern Association 1405 Lone Oak Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Mr. Aune: ROBERT P SANDEEN.E couNrY E.I::N1.Qq TE' -E -HONE 612-417 0!98 As we discussed, upon review of the proposed plat at the southwest corner of Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road, I submit the following: 1. Because of conflicts with heavy traffic on Pilot Knob Road, lack of right turn lane, grade conflicts and left turn congestion at the Lone Oak signal, only access from Lone Oak Road (300' west of intersection) and Tower View Road will be allowed. Is Sincerely, Larry G. Figgins, P.E. Administrative Design Engineer LGF/bv GM r. 0 E PILOT KNOB ROAD (CO GOAD M 3/ ) w—' L— • r O LI � M ••1 O n m n ob i6C °og p �o � _ten, . ffd, •� SUITE 3G4, 'wn'EaS ED]E C•EEICE VLA:p .••v BO BOX a•B PTOR LC E. •.IIMNES 'A S53:. • TELEPHONE 162144?- 10 LONE OA. HEIGHT'S _ LOME OAK__ 1 1 (CO. HOLD M w.•M__ •� Imo_ ' fI �i .i i i i � :f1 `\ 1/S•� 1544 '��•� � � � I:: _ ^I '1741 its � 1 1 is � _r [Cliff �`\ •�Id, _ ;.. --�; , i 01 .. - 92 ! LEGEND �.�,-f�/,• ? / . % !: / •�— 1 III I '. ; vl.wn scrw —s—.� _a -r-- 1 \ \ T' a \ /,y/I /ve 4J\ to i ''.-ri: ' / aj j• ..� ' ��.' / T�''I' 1 I m 1 I i+ Ili Ir :71 ::SF :71 v 11 i / /� 11_x-- YI a �...��•..� —_. .__ _.. TOwEA'/'EM 9ar;��•. _ROAD 161 77 'li g�; 1°11!. ' fell ON Ji11'' -- ----- - avoe BU7 03 ONM- — ___---- - - , �mjg � _ <rn _-• --- mei l _ i� f ^� -} - - � _ � Jl=. _,_. a __ _ _ f•ifsi�Y' _ - .gumta F a: rio anY—r:"'�• �° •07 .i'i' TT_ .e, ' of I •.�� .iii _ � '/, .,r' . ��'` �g �`_ ��� :111- r.._ ; � �~� • - -�,: �� --- i, ; ,%�•�' - ��� �\, . �• � . who �8 l �.� .f 0 .� \_� I \\ 1 1.1 �, /,•'r I' I • rrww =oLEI �Z I — is '� ~: —- .• i� :� ���; � -- .� o. —� 1 T •_ , I, I. N — I 1I MENDOTA \ FS. -' .y - RB GB 'Ind - _• _ t, / i .. - r :::::.. a.. . i9•- Ind; i COMMEI .• j - -` "• 'l':•- ,i' �_ PLANNED DE' LB RD R. a_ I•_ F R-11 fill � - �•„v,v,,,,y, _ � _ sVA(R�TE _ �`"`._ -�� Ind � � _ .`../� `>�% R•I-I! �L „P �IJ-•�1 WL RN R-III • - � � .moi �•�• .� I - � ©� „fl �� — Cc Ind NB P NRS ''� /: • R-II - RIIS- ` « ew .ri `:• LB - ]' -. ie.—..'•� ����;,� • P — - ®RBI Y - .,R•il a , r —• `] R•I` '.% �� ! "� \�\v .' w.? ' "��j��.'i r �' . «I� � I� r.1 R•II� G Vjy�.. �� L R-11 _ p' j', R•III,.w,.; .,,t �';w.e.... R-I _ .�,.y: R-1,• : l '-- E - _ -P .• ®, , J R-II I.� _ I-II i d'.• R-1 _� Ir- :.l '"RIII . �, �.. l'-'. • CTTY II Lr R-II , ;HALL• / R-I R I F R-II� - 1-.—• -� �p HS s R-I n 11 '' I I� R•G i i _ 3B U i 1� •'lf Et,l.t P R-11'.' D '—1 R�...\ I -•' II r- R- �.., ... R1 -- .. f R-III m� O 4 N cRtii�a -I Ei r\ ' {1 N Rill : X RB R 111 w ' yl-1 CSC/GB/ ~�R���,,• i YR- ..• i R III Rlr�a `S ^'1 -10-1 RI nR4111-•----- Lr� IL z.. R-II r-• •. - _ f . P r. �� • . / NB � V ✓.,.. • t�I°, f�,.iR l �� � 1 jr� I � ' ,' 1. ^r,Ftl ���+..1 .: ;1� • � -+ LB R-III LB ,'� c $-I' :.!'. CSC ;.,L _ -moi:! - I• S1':' — ' DLB /R-I P AL Iu°i R-I R' R-IF' (/ R II S h1j: a•f- K - tin0 - RJ N -II -''• R-II .A ! APPLE VALLEY r' p-. t k C-`'a � ROSEMOUN..^ •' _ ) . TENrA-;,- GB 140 _._ ^ ^ *LOST SPUR r' ? COUNTRY g CLUB f LBRB -- '-__..._ . �._y.. - CENTe NO 11 uiJl ; uu. — VA EY HIGH ;'VIEN/ .. R7 _ D RRtS CO TRY PAF L i" .n a Q ,R_1 / d. ,;� e / R-ij HOh( �- TR EFFLE ACRES YEHNDL -1 R-1 TV i 6E L IQAl �:�%�„- I sP cn 4 A OPP iN 1H` AI IOME 1 - PD 74-0 3 R R-4 R-3 PFS = J y PF AE, R-4 R_4 o- R-3 : s t-1 R �� ( R��JQL - R_ ADDITION R-4 ONS NS R-4 GB i RIDGE r..;_.. A N B A ., R-4 NB A /0�} Gf YANKFF 83 3kC'R-4 _ - _ qOE RB - �— I I 0 0 LONE OAK HEIGHTS - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of Midwestern Associates - Orrin Aune for preliminary plat approval of Lone Oak Heights consisting of 14.09 acres and containing 125 dwelling units was convened by Chairman Chuck Hall. The property is zoned R-3 and R-4 with planned development overlay on the entire parcel. The Land Use Guide designates 14 acre parcels as R-3 land use with a density of 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre. The proposal includes 10.1 dwelling units per acre. The public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission on September 22, 1981 to consider a preliminary plat for Lone Oak Heights, and the APC recommended approval, subject to conditions. The Council considered the application at several meetings and denied the application at its January 19, 1982 meeting for several reasons. Mr. Jack Clinton, attorney, Mr. Aune, and also Ron Swanson and Steve Harvey of Valley Engineering Co, were present. Mr. Clinton reviewed the background and also reviewed the reasons for denial and the changes being made in the present application. 72 condominium units are proposed and 53 townhouse units. He noted the density had been decreased, there were no 3 -bedroom units in the condominium proposal, the roadway had been redesigned to move Shields Lane to the east, an NSP easement and gas line will be moved to accommodate the changes in road allignment and relocation of one condominium building and this reallignment will be done at the developer's expense. It is proposed that there be 2.5 parking spaces per unit. He noted there would be buffering provided adjacent to the Timberline Addition by the school and the park and that the developer will comply with all of the conditions recommended by the staff. He noted further that no variances will be required and that the proposal complies with the zoning. Ron Swanson made a presentation concerning the road revisions and stated there would be some underground parking rather than above -ground garages. The prices will be from $40,000.00 to $60,000.00 per unit. A representative of the developer was also present and discussed financing and the buyer's qualifications for purchase of the units. All units are intended for sale. Jim Woods, President of the Timberline Association was present and objected to the density in the project, due to the high density in Section 9. In the townhouse area the private streets were not deducted to arrive at densities and further Mr. Bohne stated that the density in the townhouses are at a maximum without deducting private streets. Mr. Bohne was also concerned about traffic from the Univac complex. Staff suggested no left turn from Towerview to Shields Lane during the afternoon rush hours. Other traffic controls would also be considered. Mr. Woods again requested the Planning Commission and the Council consider down -zoning the property below the R-3 and R-4 uses. He stated that the area has changed greatly and the parcel is an island in the middle of an essentially residential area. Krob moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following: 1. If the site plan is approved, the gas main shall be relocated as to not interfere with any of the proposed buildings and also to the satisfaction of the Northern States Power Company. 2. The plat shall be subject to all easements as required by City staff. 3. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City staff. /OS 0 0 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with each final plat and not re- leased until one year after the landscaping has been completed for each plat. 5. The developer shall provide two tot lots within the development for the proposed pre-schoolers as approved by the City. 6. The developer at its cost shall construct a trail from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School between the condominium and townhouse development. 7. The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowner's Association Articles, Bylaws and Restrictions for City review. 8. A development agreement and planned development agreement shall be approved prior to the final plat application. 9. The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission since the plat abuts two County roads. 10. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public rights-of-way and along the west boundary line. In addition, drainage and utility easements incorporating the internal utilities required to service this development shall be dedicated as a part of the final plat. 11. The internal private road shall be constructed to a 28 foot minimum width with concrete curb and gutter to City approved plans and specifications. 12. Previously deferred trunk area water assessments and lateral benefit from trunk water main shall be assumed by this development as a condition of final plat approval. 13. A thirty foot half right -of- way shall be dedicated for Towerview Road. 14. Towerview Road shall be ordered for improvement prior to final plat approval and the cost shall be assessed against the benefitted property. 15. That City shall impose restrictions to cut down excessive through traffic on Shields Lane. Those in favor were Hall, Turnham, Wilkins, Wold, Bohne, Kroh and McCrea. !d( 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON RIDGE 3RD ADDITION E. Zachman Homes, Inc., Steve Ryan, for Preliminary Plat, Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition, consisting of S single family lots, 28 single family cluster lots and 8 twin home lots -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the March 23, 1982 meeting to consider a preliminary plat for Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addi- tion consisting of S single family lots, 28 single family cluster lots and 9 twin home lots. Action was taken by the APC to recom- mend approval to the City Council subject to certain conditions. Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition is a part of the second phase of the Cinnamon Ridge Planned Development. The proposed plat is consis- tent with the planned development with the exception that some of the 8 unit condos have been replaced with twin homes or townhome- two family units. For a copy of the City Planner's report, refer to pages IOq, through Ja 5 . For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of those se minutes found on pages 1,L& through 12.1 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: preliminary plat of Cinnamon Ridge 3rd for approval by the APC. 107 To approve or deny the Addition as recommended 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN i SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON RID(1E 3RD ADDITION APPLICANT: ZACHMAN HOMES - STEVE RYAN LOCATION: OUTLOT B, CINNAMON RID(M 1ST ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 17, 1982 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a preliminary plat, Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition, consisting of 5 single family lots, 28 single family cluster lots and 9 twin home lots. LAND USE: Presently the parcel is zoned PD (Planned Development) and has an over- all density of 600 dwelling units in the 72 acres. It was determined when the PD was approved in August of 1981 that the land use was in conformance with Eagan's Corprehensive Guide Plan. C0N➢v1ENTS: As stated in the agenda, the applicant has submitted an application re- questing preliminary plat approval, Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition, consisting of 5 single family lots, 28 single family cluster lots and 9 twin home lots located in part of Outlot B, Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition. There has been a miscom unication between the developer and staff, and the devel- oper is revesting besides the dwelling units listed above that also there be in- cluded 18 twin home lots and 72 townhcme or oondominiiun units. Since there was a mise mnunication, staff had only advertised 42 dwelling units, and we are in the process of checking with the City Attorney to see if we can include the 18 addi- tional twin hone lots and the 72 condominium units. If this cannot be done, we will then continue the second portion of the plat until the April APC meeting. The staff report and information supplied by the developer includes the total amount of units and not only the phase that has been advertised. In reviewing the information submitted, the applicant has been very thorough in providing accurate information in regard to the Cinnamon Ridge development pro- posal. As stated in this report, the changes which have occurred are the reduc- tion of one single family lot, adjusting lot lines on the single family cluster lots and changing the mix of condominium units and toanhome units. The original planned development had listed these 16'single family lots, 42 single family clus- ter lots, 50 twin home lots and 192 condominium units. The revised plan will have 15 single family lots, 42 single family cluster, 86 twin home lots and 136 condominium units. NOTE: As you can see, the change from the PD is a net reduction of 21 dwelling units and the reduction falls by reducing the condo units by 56 dwelling units and increasing the twin hole units by 36. W 0 CITY OF EAGAN CINNAMON RIDGE 3RD ADDITION MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO 0 The applicant is proposing to construct Slater's Road and Cinnamon Ridge Trail to make a loop street with the Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition. The Metcalf Drive and Slater's Road to Cliff Road will be constructed with the 3rd phase, or the plat- ting of Outlot A which would be the 72 condaninium units on the west side of Cin- namon Ridge Trail. Therefore, Metcalf Drive will not be constructed with this 3rd Addition. Please refer to the memorandum prepared by Steve Ryan of Zachman Homes for the detailed information regarding Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition. Staff has reviewed the information submitted and all of the data is accurate in their calculation. The only additional information staff can provide are the conditions for the 3rd Addition. These are: 1) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City staff prior to any construction on the proposed site. 2) No variances shall be granted for setbacks on the single family, duplex or cluster home development unless it relates to topographic conditions. 3) A development agreement shall be prepared and approved by the City of Eagan prior to the construction of this phase. 4) The developer shall provide garages for all of the single family cluster units. The developer shall also meet the specifications of the City Engi- neer for the private drives for the cluster units. 5) All applicable ordinances in the City shall be complied with. 6) The Third Addition of the planned development shall be subject to the revised park dedication. DCR/jach ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS 7) A 10' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all Public right-of-ways and adjacent to private property. 8) A storm sewer system complete with temporary detention'basins shall be constructed as a condition of this phased development. 9) The northern loop of Slater's Road and Cinnamon Trail shall be oonstruc- ted as a part of this 3rd Addition.to provide for through -traffic move- ment. TAC/jach loct • 0 TO: THE ADVISORY PIANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKIE, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. CDLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 18, 1982 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNNVE Q RIDGE 3RD ADDITION - ZACHMAN The Public Works Department has the following comments for consideration of the above -referenced proposed plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water main facilities were provided to the general site as a part of Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition under Project 346. These utili- ties will be extended to serve this proposed 3rd Addition. STREETS With this proposed 3rd Addition, the Slater's Road/Cinnamon Ridge Trail northern loop will have to be completed as a part of this Addition to pro- vide through -traffic movement. As a condition of the preliminary plat ap- proval, it was stated that the Metcalf Drive connection to River Hills 9th Subdivision must be constructed as a part of the 3rd phase development along with the construction of Slater's Road to its intersection with Cliff Road. Although this preliminary plat is the 3rd Addition, it is only the second phase of their development and as such, the Metcalf Drive connection will not be a condition of this 3rd Addition preliminary plat approval. n••�� a �••�ra The general drainage for this 3rd Addition is towards the north into the ponding area within the NSP easement along the northern boundary. This pond presently has a gravity storm sewer outlet to the east under the Cedar Avenue Freeway. A detention ponding area will be provided in the northwest corner of this plat in conformance with the approved grading plan and exca- vation permit issued with the 1st Addition. ASSESSMENTS Trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer have been previously assessed against this property. The only future assessments an- ticipated with this 3rd Addition would be those directly related with the extension of the laterals necessary to service this 2nd phase. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -MY Typical drainage and utility easements to incorporate the construction and extension of public utilities shall be provided as determined by the City staff. A 60' right-of-way for the Metcalf Drive connection shall be dedi- cated as a condition of this plat. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect pertaining to this report at the Planning Commission of March 23, 1982. TAC/jack, Ito March 10, 1982 Eagan City Council Eagan Planning Commission 3795 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, Mn. 55122 Dear City Officals: In looking toward the 1982 construction season, we see the slight possi- bility of a brightened economy and accordingly, an improved rate of housing sales and construction. As you may recall, the overall plan and first phase plat of Cinnamon Ridge was approved late last summer, forcing grading and utility construction into early winter. While we began marketing in late November 1981, our efforts were handicapped by the absence of a finished model home center, which is just now receiving its finishing touches. Despite the ill-fated timing of the first phase however, we find that our sales effort has been effective and the project appears destined for success. Consequently, we are now requesting your consideration of the second phase of Cinnamon Ridge, which involves development of the most northerly portion of the 72 acre Cinnamon Ridge project. Our proposal for this phase is fully consistant with the initial overal PUD approval, though it contains some minor modifications to density (reduced) and housing type (less condominium), both of which changes we anticipate being viewed positively, particularly by our surrounding neigh- bors. The specifics of our proposal are contained in the attached report. Respectfully; ZACHMAN HOMES, C. re T. Ryan Director of SubidTions STR:cjc 112- 7760 MITCHELL ROAD, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 (612) 937.9520 0 0 PROPOSED PLAN - CINNAMON RIDGE 3rd ADDITION The area which comprises the proposed Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition is the north - end of Cinnamon Ridge project, legally described as Outlot B Cinnamon Ridge. (See Exhibit A). This same area encompasses approximately 31 acres,and as originall; indicated, includes both the second and third phases of the overall project (see Exhibit B). We are requesting preliminary plat approval for the entire northern area at this time, since our original project approval involved runstrurting the balance of the loop road connection during phase 2 and as such we will be dedicating that loop road with the next final plat. In the following paragraphs I will attempt to both cover the specifics of our current proposal as well as provide a comparison with our previous PUD approval. To assist in defining the major topics in the proposal, I have divided the discussion into the two areas of land use and transportation. LAND USE In reviewing the revised land use plan, (See Exhibit C) you may recall that the general placement pattern of the various land uses and housing types have changed very little. More specifically, the original plan indicated traditional single family lots adjacent to the Burnsville border (West edge) to smooth the transition from the existing single family homes in River Hills 10th Addn. This general pattern is re- tained, though, in the redesign, we have dropped one of the originally proposed lots. it should be noted that the lot which was dropped was not located abutting the border, and thus, the change does not reduce the amount border transition that previously existed. The single family cluster homes previusl.y propsed for the northwestern area of the plat remain unchanged, though their location was adjusted slightly to accomo date a'change in the location of the NSP highline easement. On the eastern side of the plat, 84 units of eight unit building condominiums were originally proposed. This is the specific area which was originally identified as the third phase of the overall project. The revisions in this area involve a continuation of the present style of condominiums being constructed in the first phase; a reorientation of the buildings, such that their exposure to the Cedar Freeway is minimized and they are pulled further away from our nothern border; and a reduction of twelve units. In the original plan the balance (after lst phase development) of the property located inside of the loop was identified as part of the second phase. The land uses in this area were indicated as eighteen units of twin homes, forty units of Condominium and approximately 21 acres of park. There are two modifications included in our current proposal regarding this area which need further discussion. First the forty units of condominiums have been deleted and replaced by thirty-six units of private association style townhomes. This change stems from our marketing experiences in Cinnamon Ridge thus far. Specifically, we have found extremely positive reaction to our (single family) cluster concept, due primarily to the fact that the concept matches housing type and lifestyle preferences at an affordable price. At the same time, we are finding that many buyers have a preference for attached housing with the private association created lifestyle, but are not satisfied with accepting condominium housing in order to find the right price. In response to this marketing dilemma, we have found that a very pos- itive reaction exists towards two family attached housing constructed in a townhouse - like pattern, on a private street systme, with a Homeowners Association. This concept is viewed with enthusiasm since it provides the buyer with all of tho perceived of single neighbor attached housing and managed property maintenance, and does so, at a price which is more affordable than the traditional twin home. 113 PROPOSED PLAN - CIWION RIDGE 3rd ADDITION • Pg. 2 As a product of the townhome/condo revision, discussed above, the configuration of the park was changed from triangular to more rectangular. The park area,as now presented, is approximately 2.5 acres and includes larger entrance points along the public street. A final point regarding the revised design of the park, is that a through access (north to south) was incorporated in response to suggestions made by the park commission nearly one year ago. It is our impression that the the through access is superior to the previously approved configuration, in that it provides greater direct access to the northern portion of the development. A summary tabulation of land use specifics and changes is listed below. LAND USE BREAKDOWN COMPARISON LandUse/Housing Type Original Plan/Units Revised Plan/Units Single Family 6 5 Single Family Cluster 28 .. 28 Twin home 18 18 Condominium 124 72 Townhome 0 36 TOTAL 176 159 REVISED PLAN DETAIL BREAKDOWNS Gross acreage: Gross density: Density net of park: Density net of Park & Public St Density net of Park, Public street and Private Drives: Net Acreage & Building Coverage by Housing Type: 1. Single Family 2. Single Family Cluster 3. Twin homes 4. Townhome 5. Condo 31.12A 5.11 DU/A 6.94 DU/A 7.94 DU/A 8.63 DU/A 1.51 A - 9.98 5.06 A - 15.23% 2.15 A - 19.058 4.17 A - 208 7.23 A - 17.48 115 PROPOSED PLAN - CINNA14ORIDGE 3rd ADDITION • Pg. 3 TRANSPORTATION Two topics exist within the general discussion of transportation: nature of road system & scheduling of construction (phasing). The nature of the road system, consistant with past approval; is a system comprised of standard Public roads and private driveways associated with the single family clusters, condominiums and now, the townhome revision. You will recall that as the townhome area is a replacement for a previously approved condominium area , there is no additional private driveways, but rather simply a change of driveway alignment. Regarding construction scheduling, as mentioned earlier, all of the public road with the exception of the Metcalf connection road would be constructed with the second phase. The final plat, when presented for phase 2, will include all of the single family, twin homes, park, single family clusters, townhome area, and right of way for the public street loop connection, leaving only the condo area (including the Metcalf connection road) as an Outlot to be final platted as the third phase in the future. As previously agreed, at such time as we final plat the third phase, we must dedicate the right of way for both Metcalf and the connection of Slater Road at Cliff through the South east corner of the overall property. This arrangement was originally agreed to since the additional road was not critical until such time as the condominiums in the third phase were constructed and because the construction of the second access point on Cliff simultaneous with the Metcalf connection would remove any incentive (remote as it might be) to access the site through River Hills 9th Addition to the north. Traffic generation for phase 2 is estimated to be distributed as follows: Single family 5 units = 50 trips per day Single family cluster 28 units = 224 " Twin homes 18 units = 126 " Townhomes 36 units = 252 " " " 87 Units = 652 trips per day Peak hour trips = 65 trips To assist in clarifing the previously discussed topics,, exhibits illustrating the preliminary plat, phasing, grading and utilities are included on the following pages. A final note regarding the exhibits concerns the grading and utilities plans in that both are essentially identical to the original plans due to the minor nature of revisions. 116 vv "1", Ir.roY- 1 . OUTLOT 8 OR NO 1 TJUr NO 001ANE I �• I .1 n • 6 I TJ4/T 00 OO LANA • ' ti .1/� �•I•If �1�ru 111 •/ . � ,�. + .; 1 1 1! ruo •rv'u'►- � J 1' II .ry J OUTL ... �2 41• _I: 1 � � I li�i` jlii.��f� .1 �•,l•AV •,., :, j �' 6I i ' • 11 1 , �1 t T [� '!r' ,� 1 1 '•f yY�l r•�-i.�i•-� I ; I ~rl�~ � !I ,4-= 1 ; , \ I p , 411 IA uYli•Y • 1 1 ,. 4 . 0 v' T C • .wo t 1 �ON.11 NYIY11� 1 -f • ' 1 • CARTIER AYE. elf '41 CHMAN HOMES INC.INCHOMES INC. CINNAMON RIDGE EACAN, MINNESOTA F� Fikik%. PL-AT- 1� F-of"ITT c�►r A: Op' +```" 00 T.N.11 NO OD LANL . 'T.10T !0 00 EANe � 1 CARTIER AYR. 01!*%4 f�O, . Ot 1 OR Yt' i • • ZACHMAN HOMES INC. CINNAMON RIDGE :1. %�troU2e� -PHASING PLAN EAGAN• MINNESOTA E/: • _ TJI.77 BG to LANs j t-;: •••� xi,:•� . OW R.� MULTIFAMILY r g `\ t\\'t (. J \\\. ; - . . .. ,,, -• Iffy 71, = ! �'_'_' \ / � \ ` ;'\ I I�" � '\ Ifi 1111I��r �J .•�: - . � 1�J / i, J'f� !1 I I' 1 Ijl 1.%I 1 ) \MI. �� • 11: n .� IO• •,• a f .` � li'•I Il'�R-9•Lul}TIFALL)F�J;i.. ; �. .`• \ ✓•�^\ —�,�.\ (�.• \': � III, ��II,1.1 l I) ' PARK � �pN" � • • .�. '\�•.`-�� '�•' �1 "_ : �: .- � �' � � ! � - % �. �I Q \ _�^• f 61 SLEFAMILY •^I -�I ! I I �,.�- • PAR l - CLU ER HOMES • SIN Gt, LF- ILY � • � ` I \� • WG r I OM e 1 3'O .. ... • -il[ CARTIER AVL • • 944t`44,p+ ' � � �ci ^ I v •r ,r P ZACHMAN HOMES INC. CINNAMON RIDGE EAGAK YWNESOTA REVISED LAND USE PLAN • L 25XHIe;,ITIle- " GAJ ,' • ,�'! , • li,` •!: -.� � \ � - • •—ii ••-JJYF�'; ,��� ':. CY,IAYCa_III]CC TMC( Y, it is AU, �c!--�+'uI�.. to I,? -.:!i• :.!1.!�'4�'t4ii,e'-J,�..::r.`,�C�?.��J, i1yJz.� ;r< •SNR 1,110 `~ � �� ,+ I 3 0. � i.,.l . �,ri, I r �' Aq�•. :.':haae� R r Ir It W1. CARTIER AVE. ' - ... -. .moi i' �. � ��� i.• / ,�-=--..-.-� CINNAMON RIDGE THIRD ADDITIONZACHMAN HOMES INC. EADAN. MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY PLAT �`LlJr�IT `tn►! ' '(PAS AK I or or or ■ ral'tra I • rraor W".— or or or ■ ral'tra 1 / ... . .•�.l l➢e110 tW.li �1•.E•f;:-•.w.-.Q•.n•. �\�lr �C""r.' .. _ �__. .. ..�_ a\�:a-t-=�,t- -�_ 1I::=v=' .'_! , 'Dory-:'���': �` _. - ,"� .' r i o f'�;..�...-•-••-. � 1 `i`��_� Fi+^: i� . cnauuox, ioat'riu / /.. ,' '� K"yty\fit. �\ J 4%�� `11 Y�It �� •i -'.r 1` ��,v � ;1 ,. %••_— � I _ � 11/ �.11ll 1y .J 11 1 19 'a7�,� .• / / � l M•� _ P' �: " f ' It (C It ,..if�� t •� \�\'Y,,"i� 1 111 � ' i . `�~ \ f �!� ice^ • _r I t� / . I :+.c;�4 `t;•+ 'C� �^-� `a`�+` i >< ` :moi;' \ .`� / 1 r Ell • / 1'' \^. !'0 �t,v o\I� \ �X L'•;--'C:� // �. / 1 � �~.0/ ii / /.,, sl . ,.\:'•.`u`!1 •BTa%;. ..ai u2C'1+•,'►.RR �\ , t `\ M'1 \���••1 t/ / yl ., ��/'yn�i'7 moa1a•orerE r j� i /� I`!\�S �•`• •.l •I�( •`� •!�.�.r\ �/�%! J •� I mo.]• �oe 1 4\� :• 1R� S•.�5 •:., _ •� 1 / , / r ej"� 'a's�tlr°i t4'% , a' I / I w rt !cv' haatgxalr tl �1. ioT W. ' ,� •I o. I I � � py, ,e I y/ C.RTIER AVL , oft \%7 / • Y � � I • / \ .., rl ZACHMAN HOMES INC.iF CINNAMON RIDGE THRO ADD=N FAGAN, MINNESOTA ,, • PRELIMINARY PLAT'' .Ct[1J1f21-too 15PC iI tG*�f Op V� N N 0 ' ' `�''�y'•�; /•' /kgs°�/�� `��4 '� I I I• I I '��Q �� / ~:.• + � '. `\1 .� � f .i Ali r r . � . �.: • 19 ZACHMAN HOMES'INC. CINNAMON RIDGE �A.tq=N GRADING TrAN. . . CINNAMON WNNEWTA, rN 141 isIor„ 1::„ �� �• Ipinuuil ! /••r'%r •! ! - �ti _ � SSSS 1 1 :1'1'11,, '\,fY' % ,a(� \ %{• �/r:.:. i ?.,I�\� \ \ �1 ��� '\ I • r �:, ; . ���,-� "''ter—��'�z�.._ 1� 1., ��/ � � ;•�/—'_ :i' ,,, � 1 � � �1 �.�, i , i, �, •— 777 �e.,.tt I VV . •• .� � 1 ,�\ .L� \, ,,. ",,,��./ liJ,/i/f I�,��•`\\ II� •� �11� _Iv •� �t111-�iJ;'L' \. I f Ji 1 1 Y "yr�:�:a>/./,EfcfYx".v_ '._; 1�.L. � � ..L1J:,r-!/`•�r i� � � ,. • r( Date qta '• • _ "'�•��.�// �� �'`!/T ��Ar.',:;11 iir,�,�1�"`r \� �,(r�).1 ISI f ' Oe L� „ Aur r'_ .. .!r .:.1 „ •. .. _; ' u ' i I .i %_ ; - •.• •..CARTIER AVL •.. 4,0 ZACHMAN HOMES INC. CINNAMON RIDGE euro ADOm N UTILITIES PIAN EADAN. MINNESOTA Y1/u1 C6110 l�� 11 MENDOTA ,',NTS. \ 1 ------------ GE C• �� kM / -% � - �_, GOLF i 'aur., j:-7 c l- •'i • _..i / �4• ;•.�:: •r Ind -- -Intl • 2i' f�_ _ �e F 1 - of .LB ii... OF /f ©R-0 RIII ° s Ind. 4l Vag ..YL•ar•.4 .:w, wl '� - v,.. RI \ Lira•a Ind _ R-III1' f m ' wr ♦...:i, oaf... Ij', � A ..I�. � �:::k._ -- ~• ' Indy'-- y NB 1 LB -1 R -9I. .- C RII ? .v,> R-II'rM CSC D c R-19 _ .W.r, •as. �Q, LEV -R-II R-1: P / R14 a.li"RII 'P .. 1 ; g ul>r ` ate. Crir R I RII Q Vis- I Ind .. ix� spa r X , I HALL _. R- i V CSC P, ,.�: >- .,-r R•t- � R111 rr HS ,1 f li �' C ai 9i .c '�•+y-,.Y. ,.R -II `•� LJ� :41 -R10 GB 1 e�:(•f� rt�'���I P ..© 'I R / r Le, -• II R R -III - SLB � r - M I .- / p LB N _"ti;5�3?�ia. .-_� E; 14�RII�I . `. RB .,y : R -III R IIS' RIII• -R ��.•d - im ay'� � RIII CSC/GB/LB ;rte � "s LfJ• JmFa P Ral - ✓`'• •RII R -II �n� J ,s. RII r; ""I ` ,7 A .ci : R-11 .t t� =+ .qi s T j e.,.. �( --1'S+,a•. ' NB '• as t\%� I 1'L:fwiF�11 - +r •'�•R•I`,� P-1 '' ..,,• . CSC L\�,n, �� I••I I .� .,.. / RBLB -' P l� i -I si Ic y r O R -I e n�I'1?N P P RII N \�{! A� FAAA �$ t._' R -II 1 a r Q P l'" R �! �! APPLE :1 VALLEY r-_ B"4, it .,-`> ROSEMOUNr LI ADD (�((l1r� HL LI 9 / i CSC 4 :v µP R-4 ,v CSC PF A R-4 ti A CCGG )WT4xi of Aft N iEEN CB CB i PF _. r JUN10'? !NB , n Q- PF o NB/'^��. HIGH moqi p 8 B-2] _- IOO]l n,, I. e ..1111T1 �T�j11 (L- SCHOOL W t I +, ! oJ 1 _ - r PK MART ri.'u:�(;''��� I 'v � `� it I CSC „r'A U 11J L NB )l r' �I RIVER RB 1 LI ADD (�((l1r� HL LI 9 / i CSC 4 :v µP R-4 ,v CSC PF A R-4 ti A CCGG )WT4xi of Aft N iEEN CB CB i PF _. r JUN10'? !NB , n Q- PF o NB/'^��. HIGH moqi p 8 B-2] _- IOO]l n,, I. e ..1111T1 �T�j11 (L- SCHOOL W t I +, ! oJ 1 _ - r PK MART ri.'u:�(;''��� I 'v � `� it I CSC „r'A U 11J L NB )l r' �I RIVER RB 0 0 CINNAMON RIDGE 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The hearing concerning the application of Zachman Homes for preliminary plat approval of Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition on Outlot B, Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition was convened. The project would include 5 single-family lots, 28 single-family cluster lots, and 9 twin -home lots. The Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition would be in the Cinnamon Ridge Planned Development and the 3rd Addi- tion would consist of 15 single-family lots, 42 single-family clusters, 86 twin -home lots, and 136 condominium units. Mr. Steve Ryan was present and he stated that the 3rd Addition would cover the entire north end of the project. The proposal is not to build Metcalf Drive at the present time and further, that there is a net reduction in the number of units in the proposal from the original planned development, with a net reduction of 21 dwelling units. Berming will be included along the Cedar freeway and utilities will be looped through the Phase 2 project. Phase 3 will remain as an outlot at the present time. In addition, the developer will place some improvements in the park areas. There were a number of questions from interested persons present in the audience. There was also a question from Mr. Bohne as to maintenance of the twin -homes and Mr. Ryan stated that there would be party wall restric- tions, which will be filed and also be reviewed by the City. Planning Commis- sion members commended the developer in changing the plans to meet the demands of the consumer, which provide for a larger number of town homes. One owner present from the Zachman addition east of Cedar Avenue was concerned about faulty construction in some of the homes built by Zachman. Krob moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. That 18 additional town home lots be included in the project. 2. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City staff prior to any construction on the proposed site. 3. No variances shall be granted for setbacks on the single family, duplex or cluster home development unless it relates to topographic condi- tions. 4. A development agreement shall be prepared and approved by the City of Eagan prior to the construction of this phase. 5. The developer shall provide garages for all of the single family cluster units. The developer shall also meet the specifications of the City Engineer for the private drives for the cluster units. 6. All applicable ordinances in the City shall be complied with. 7. The 3rd Addition of the planned development shall be subject to the revised park dedication. Iz6 0 0 8. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public rights-of-way and adjacent to private property. 9. A storm sewer system complete with temporary retention basins shall be constructed as a condition of this phased development. 10. The northern loop of Slater's Road and Cinnamon Trail shall be constructed as a part of this 3rd Addition to provide for through -traffic movement. All voted yes. /a7 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty -One IRB FINANCING REQUEST - DIAMOND LAKE INC. F. Diamond Lake, Inc., Request for Public Hearing to Consider I. R. Financing in the Amount of $750,000 -- A new application has been submitted to the City of Eagan, again requesting industrial revenue bond financing for equipment and trade fixtures for the proposed new Sullivan store located in the Pilot Knob Shopping Center. A similar request was submitted before the City Council and was denied. The motion of the December 1, 1981 meeting reads as follows, " Egan then moved, based upon the reasons above described and the fact that a precedent would be set by the Council on authorizing financing for equipment only, to deny the request for industrial revenue financing. Parranto seconded the motion and all voted in favor." In order for this item to be reconsidered by the City Council, a member of the City Council on the prevailing motions side must make a motion to reconsider. Apparently, anyone can second that motion. Those City Councilmembers on the prevailing side are Mayor Blomquist and Councilmembers Egan and Smith. City Councilmember Wachter was not present for that part of the City Council meeting on December 1; City Councilmember Thomas was not serving on the City Council and former City Councilmember Parranto does not currently serve on the City Council. The City Administra- tor has received the application and full documentation supporting the application which are in the customary booklet form. If a public hearing is set for the May 18, 1982 City Council meeting, the support information will be presented in the City Council packet at that time. Enclosed on pages )a q through 1;e is a copy of a letter from Mr. Bob Levy, egl ar—counsel for iamond Lake, Inc., and also on pages 111 through is a copy of the minutes from the December 3-,-= City CounciImeeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To move or not move to reconsider, and if a motion is approved to reconsider, a public hearing would be set for May 18, 1982 to consider the industrial revenue financing for Diamond Lake, Inc. 11a% 0 LAW OFFICES • ESTES PARSINEN S, LEVY A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 700 PILLSBURY CENTER 200 SOUTH SIXTH STREET JOHN O. PARSINEN R. G. ESTES MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS402 ROBERT A. LEVY ERIC B. SCHULTZ TELEPHONE JACK A. ROSBERG LEON I.STEINSERG 16121 333-2111 April 14, 1982 City of Eagan, Minnesota 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Attn.: Tom Hedges, City Manager RE: Diamond Lake, Inc. - IRB Application Dear Tom: Enclosed please find an IRB application for Diamond Lake regarding equipment and trade fixture financing for its proposed new store to be located in the Pilot Knob Shopping Center. As you are aware, this application is a re -submission of the application filed with the City in the Fall of 1981. It is our belief that the City Council may have voted down the earlier application based upon a misunderstanding re- garding certain facts relative to the application of bond proceeds. At the time of the earlier application, it was our understanding that the City had not previously approved IRB financing for equipment and trade fixtures and that the City Council had certain reservations about the useful life of the equipment and the amount of equity that Diamond Lake would be investing. We were requested to prepare a list of the equipment to be financed and present that at the time of the earlier public hearing. The list which was prepared was an all inclusive list of all items of equipment and trade fixtures which would be used in the store. It was not intended as a specific list of just those items to be financed out of bond proceeds. We prepared it on an all inclusive basis to show the City Council that Diamond Lake would be spending significant sums /29 ESTES PARSINEN & LEVY • City of Eagan, Minnesota Page Two April 14, 1982 of money out of its own pocket in order to fixture the store in excess of that which would be paid out of bond proceeds. As a practical matter of underwriting, the bond purchaser will require a security interest in all items of equipment whether paid for out of bond proceeds or with equity monies, in order to insure that it have a full complement of equipment for store operation if there should ever be a default on the loan. It was our feeling that the Council focused too much on some of the specific smaller shorter life items of equipment as being a reason not to approve the financing. Diamond Lake is not asking the City to approve financing of mops and buckets, as was suggested at the council meeting in December, but merely was showing all items on the list for the purpose of clarifying to the council that it would be investing significant equity monies. The normal industry custom for financing of equipment and trade fixtures for supermarkets is to finance 100% of the equipment. As you will note from that list, it is Diamond Lake's expectation that it will be spending significant sums out of pocket in excess of the financed amount. In addition, it is anticipated that the cost of initial shelf inventory will be approximately $500,000 which must be paid by Diamond Lake up front without financing. If the City Council was misled by that all inclusive list, we feel that is unfortunate, since that list was only an attempt to document the equity investment. It is our hope that the City Council will reconsider their Position based upon this clarification. Diamond Lake respectfully requests that the City waive its application fee and any fee for review by its financial consultant, considering that Diamond Lake has already paid such fees once. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly,yours, Robert A. Levy RAL/jcw 150 Council Minutes December 1, 1981 storm sewer system. Mr. Kenneth Ketchum, attorney representing property owners, had questions concerning the method of the appraisal and the method the City used in arriving at these assessments. He stated, that in his opinion, that the area being assessed is less than the total drainage district and it was noted that the reason is that because all the storm sewers were not installed at the same time. Numerous other property owners being affected by the assessments had questions of the council and many of them opposed the assessments that were being levied by the Council, in particular, the addi- tional assessment for the reassessment cost. Approximately 49 property owners submitted objections to the assessments in writing before or during the Council meeting and it was requested that the City acknowledge receipt of the objections from each of the property owners. It was noted that because of the large number of objections that were received that the Council could not hear all the objections at the time of the December 1 hearing and the City Attorney recommended that the Council adopt the assessment roll as to those parcels where objections were not submitted by December 1 and that the Council con- tinue the assessment hearing as to the remaining parcels where objections were submitted and received. Council members indicated that a letter will be sent to all of the objecting property owners as to the schedule of the continued hearing. After considerable discussion, Smith moved, Parranto seconded the motion to close the hearing and to adopt the reassessment roll as to all parcels where objections were not received by the City Council at the December 1, 1981 meeting based upon the Findings of Fact, and Conclusions, a copy of which is attached to these Minutes and made a part of these Minutes. All voted in favor. Eagan then moved, Smith seconded the motion to continue the reassessment hearing as to the parcels for which objections were submitted to the City Council on or before December 1, 1981 to be rescheduled to January 12, 1982 at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. It was stated to all persons present that they would then be given an opportunity to submit testimony and evidence concerning each of their respective parcels of property owned by them on January 12, 1982 or at such continued hearing if necessary, at a later time. All members voted in favor. DIAMOND LAKE, INC. - I. R. FINANCING The public hearing concerning the application of Diamond Lake, Inc, for Industrial Revenue financing in the amount of $750,000.00 for the acquisition of equipment and fixtures to be used in conjunction with the retail super- market in the proposed Pilot Knob Shopping Center was convened by Mayor Blomquist. Robert Levy, attorney for Diamond Lake, Inc. and Mr. John Sullivan, Jr. were present on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Levy stated that Richfield Bank and Trust Company has committed itself to finance the $750,000.00 and that the loan will be paid off prior to the expected useful life of the equipment. There were many questions from City Council members and members of the audience as to whether the Council should finance equipment and fixtures at all or in part. It was noted that this was the first example where a request for I. R. Financing has been submitted exclusively for fix- tures and equipment. There was questions as to whether this type financing is an inducement to new business and whether the approximately 90 new jobs which consist of only 30 full-time jobs, is a sufficient inducement for the issuance of the financing. It was noted there would be no increase in taxes and 4 131 Council Minutes December 1, 1981 Industrial Revenue Financing had already been authorized for the shopping center building itself. Councilman Smith suggested that the City Council ought to consider issuing financing for fixtures but not for equipment that has a short anticipated useful life. It was noted the total estimated cost of the fixtures is $871,000.00, including sales tax, engineering fees, etc. The attorney for the Pilot Knob Shopping Center was present and indicated the supermarket is critical for the financing for the entire center. After lengthy discussion, Smith moved to authorize up to $555,000.00 industrial revenue financing for heavy duty equipment, including fixtures, which include a life expectancy of at least ten years. There was no second and the motion died. Egan then moved, based upon the reasons above described and the fact that a precedent would be set by the Council in authorizing financing of the equipment only, to deny the request for industrial revenue financing. Parranto seconded the motion and all voted in favor. FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND USE HEARING The Mayor convened the proposed use hearing to consider suggestions as to the use of federal revenue sharing monies for calendar year 1982. The second hearing will be held on December 15 with the adoption of the 1982 general fund budget and simultaneously with the adoption of the 1982 general fund budget. Notice of the proposed use hearing has been published in the Dakota County Tribune and Mr. Hedges explained the history of federal revenue sharing and the possible cut-backs in federal revenue sharing in the future. Smith moved, Egan seconded the motion to close the hearing. All voted in favor. There were no objections at the time of the hearing. LONE OAK ROAD - SPEED LIMIT Mr. Hedges reviewed a letter that was submitted by Representative Carolyn Rodriguez, including a letter dated October 22, 1981 from a member of the Attorney General's staff regarding speed zoning in school zones and urban districts within municipal limits. There was concern about the speed limits on Lone Oak Road near Pilot Knob School and also on sections of Pilot Knob Road. School Zone limits can be established to be effective only when there are children in the area and urban district zoning limits would be established only if highways are at least within 100 feet apart for a distance of one- quarter mile. Karen Flood was present and asked that the City Council take action to attempt to reduce speed limits in those areas. Smith moved, Egan seconded the motion to direct the staff to commence a study to determine whether the City can comply on Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road under the Urban District provisions of the Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 169, and if so, that the staff prepare a Petition to the Minnesota Department of Transporta- tion to designate those stretches of Pilot Knob Road and Lone Oak Road as Urban District; further, Egan moved that in the event that the staff deter- mines that the sections do not qualify as Urban District to the Council, then request that Representative Rodriguez and Senator Howard Knutson submit special legislation during the 1982 Legislative Session to provide under M.S.A. 169.02, subd. 59, Urban District, that where structures in Eagan de- voted to business, industry or dwelling houses are situated at intervals of less than 300 feet for a distance of a quarter of a mile or more, be desig- nated an Urban District. Parranto seconded the motion, all voted yes. 5 13; Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty -Two COUNTRYSIDE VILLA - FINAL PLAT G. Final Plat for Countryside Villa -- The City has received an application for final plat consideration for Countryside Villa. A copy of the final plat is enclosed on page 13t for your informa- tion. All conditions placed on this plat at t e —time of preliminary plat have been fulfilled and/or guaranteed by way of an acceptable letter of credit. This final plat has been reviewed by all affected City departments and is now being recommended for formal approval by Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the final plat for Countryside Villa as Countryside Builders and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary docu- ments for final plat. 133 w -P COUNTRYSIDE VILLA N 1J_J Y3RiY_n- 0 • Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty -Three JOINT CABLE COMMISSION UPDATE A. Joint Burnsville/Eagan Joint Cable Commission Update -- The next meeting of the Joint Cable Commission is scheduled for April 22, 1982 at 7:00 p.m. at the Burnsville City Hall. Since there has not been any meetings of the joint commission since the last City Council meeting, there is no report. CONTRACT 82-4 B. Contract 82-4, Approve Plans & Specifications/Order Advertisement for Bids (Twin View Manor 2nd Addition, et al, Streets) -- Contract 82-4 provides for the installation of streets in the following projects and subdivisions: Project 335B -- Twin View Manor Second Addition Project 340B -- Windcrest 2nd Addition Project 341B -- Windtree 2nd Addition Project 346B -- Cinnamon Ridge First Addition Public hearings for the above referenced projects were held on July 21 or August 4, 1981 and subquently ordered for installation for the Council. All final costs have been recorded and all neces- sary easements have been acquired. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the plans and specifications for Contract 82-4 (Twin View Manor 2nd Addition, et al, Streets) and order advertisement for bids with the bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, May 11, 1982. 13.8 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty -Four BRITTANY MANOR ASSESSMENT PETITION C. Brittany Manor Petition, Assessment Interest Vacation (Project 272B) -- Enclosed on page 139, is a copy of a petition that the City received from thirteen property owners within the Brittany Manor First Addition requesting special consideration by the City Council pertaining to the interest rate that was levied on the special assessment for the installation of streets. This hearing was held on June 16, 1981. All notices pertaining to this final assessment hearing were published in the legal newspaper and sent to the property owners of record informing them of the final assess- ment hearing date. Apparently, when these property owners purchased their lots from Tollefson Builders, Inc., it was with the under- standing that all assessments would be paid. Carl Tollefson placed an escrow to cover these street assessments with Dakota County Abstract Company. Both the City Administrator and Public Works Director have met with representatives of this neighborhood to discuss the issue. In addition, the Public Works Director has met with the representative of Dakota County Abstract Company to try to determine where any miscommunication could have occurred. A summary of the discussions indicates that the property owners, upon receipt of the notice of final assessment hearing, contacted Carl Tollefson's office to inform them of their concern pertaining to their agreement understanding of all assessments being paid. Mr. Tollefson's office informed these property owners that he had placed an escrow with Dakota County Abstract to cover these assess- ments and theat they would not be liable. At the time of the final assessment hearing, there were no objections presented and subse- quently the roll was approved and staff was authorized to certify the roll to Dakota County for collection. After that final assess- ment hearing, the City received only two payments for these assess- ments and subsequently certified the rest to the county for col- lection on the 1982 property tax statement. Apparently, Dakota County Abstract was never informed of the final assessment hearing and subsequently did not pay the assessments with the escrow established by Carl Tollefson. Therefore, these assessments were spread over a five year period against the individual properties with the first year's principal installment of $563.97 and the first year's interest on the unpaid balance amounting to $346.85 based on 8%. 134 0 %genda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty -Five 0 In summary, Mr. Tollefson placed an escrow with the Dakota County Abstract for the payment of these assessments. Subsequently, he refuses to pay any interest associated with these assessments resul- ting from their non-payment due to the fact that he had previously placed an amount to cover their payment when levied by the City. Dakota County Abstract indicates that they were not aware that this final assessment had been levied in explanation as to why they did not release the escrow account to pay off these assess- ments. The home owners object to having the interest for non- payment placed against their property taxes due to the fact that their purchase agreement with Tollefson Builders, Inc., provided that they would not be responsible for these assessments. A research of the special assessment file indicates that three lots have paid off their street assessments in this subdivision subse- quent to the June 16, 1981 public hearing. It is interesting to note that on Lot 14, Block 2 (1611 Norwood Drive), Dakota County Abstract paid off the final street assessment in full without in- terest penalty within the thirty days of final assessment hearing. Based on that fact, the staff feels that Dakota County Abstract should have been aware of their obligation on the other lots and subsequently release the escrow account to pay off all the out- standing assessments. In addition, Dakota County Abstract continues to hold the escrow account in what staff presumes would be an in- terest bearing account. The staff would feel that Dakota County Abstract should contribute whatever interest they have earned on this escrow account towards the payment of the interest charged for these unpaid street assessments. In summary, staff feels that the City was not negligent in any manner in notification or levying of these assessments and that we would not recommend any special consideration being given to reduction or elimination of the interest payment associated with these unpaid assessments as requested by the petitioning property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the petition request by thirteen property owners in Brittany Manor First Addition to waive any interest penalties on the street assess- ments levied on June 16, 1981 as a part of Project 272B for streets in the Brittany Manor First Addition. s/Thomas L. Hedges City inistrator 137 (de- `6/Le e(45;Vep h,9f?tcvwher5•oI'� -Rr,-Ha.j Esai�cs c% herc-b y �P'f�l�ion tie aj-/) -Cvr 5a;d i nge!'cs! or) assOOPssmeAds. We wowl�i �ike -� so �� �� �au✓le; ane( Pres��,-f our P/ob/ewe r !'�� Recently, we the below sinned oromerty owners of P'• z*tar:} r_cciv_d Ln n»::nr:.r, • � � „_ :. __. _. ements due in 1982. „o-a•I _...,_ inc'_�.rr..'e� =: _:: --c ;:. .-- .ssneYt ( street and er 272 1 of $563, p- arc raer.=,. charge of $346. 85. n_'.yyF•{: �'-�e_• i. :_ ., - .fai.r 1YI that none. tdile date _i EVIGlata payments. Therefore we reqs -rest that the i.nterest, charge be removed oend:rtr rlo'tificaticn by the c:.'t.y to the below signed property owners and that we are g;.ver, an appropriate period of time to arrange for payment of said assessment without interest charge. -------------------- M+•. and Mrs. Rrrless Mr, and Mrs. Fedde 1652 Norwbnd Dr. 1623 Nnrwood Dr. 1615 Norwood Dr. Mr. and Mrs. Rudolph 1644 Norwood Ct. Mr. and Mrs. Widsterl 138 592 Norwood Cir. _ Mr. arl?Mrs. Carter ^' 'Norwood Cir. Mr. and, Mrs. Gallus 1F.,,?!'. Norwood Dr. : .43 Norwood Dr. and Mrs. Roberts 1635 Norwood ''.r. arld Mrs. Schneider 'FS -I Norwood Dr. •:,rwond Cir. 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: .CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 16, 1982 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE Protective Inspection Monthly Report Enclosed on page A40 is a copy of the March 1982 Protective In- spection monthly report. Comprehensive Plan Density Calculations Enclosed on pages /`�I through /q -Z is a copy of a memorandum prepared by theitE y PTanner whic a dresses the Comprehensive Plan density calculations. There was discussion at the last City Council meeting regarding interpretation of the Comprehensive Guide Plan as either net or gross when determining units per acre for purposes of development applications. Early Warning Procedures Enclosed on page /4 3 is a copy of an early warning procedures memo prepared by i� viT—Defense Director Reid. This memorandum is informative. City Administrator 139 PROTE_CTIVI° L"SPFC1ZCnb NINTHLY RM- RT MARCH, 1982 Vw-?FCPION/OFFICF FOURS This Month Year -Tb -Date Building 52 106 Plumbing 23 73 EVAC 24 92 Electric 55 129 Water Softener 9 19 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 0 0 Signs 9 12 NATURE. OF NJILDING PERMITS ISSUED Nkrnber 1_his Month Year -Tb -Date Building 117.0 —7759-7— Plumbing 91.0 253.0 i?VAC 63.5 127.0 Adninistrative/Office 126.0 709.0 Fire Marshal 44.0 63.0 Miscellaneous 29.5 67.0 General Office 185.0 382.0 Permit Processing 136.5 2.40.0 City Council Meeting 1.5 1.5 This Month Year -Tb -Date Building 52 106 Plumbing 23 73 EVAC 24 92 Electric 55 129 Water Softener 9 19 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 0 0 Signs 9 12 NATURE. OF NJILDING PERMITS ISSUED Nkrnber Type Units Va1_u.iation Peramt Fee Plan Checic Fe T t 23 Single Famil 23 ,318,000.00 $6,923.50 $3,461.75 $37,999.75 4 Pumlex 4 175,000.00 $1,019.5n $ 509.75 $ 6,036.75 12 1-ulti-Famil 12 521,000.00 $1,989.00 $ 994.50 $16,461.00 0 Cmawrieal 0 - - - - 0 Industrial 0 - - - - 0 Institutional 0 - - - - I Res. C.amae 1 5,000.On $ 50.50 - $ 53.00 1 Shim. Pool 1 8,500.00 1 $ 74.50 $ 37.25 $ 116.25 11 Miscellaneous 11 $ 74,962.00 1 $ 664.00 $ 221.00 $ 923.50 52 ITUDUS 52 $2.,107,162.00 ` $10,721.00 S5,224.25 $61,.590.25 * Total Fees Include: Pu:Llr?in.T Perrot Fee, Sus -Charge, Plan Check Fee, SAC liv.t Fee, hater Connection Fee, 4hter Nbter Fee and Road Lhit Fee. /40 0 TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. Fd=, CITY PLANNER DATE: APRIL 15, 1982 RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DENSITY CALCULATIONS It is staff's understanding that on April 6, 1982, the City Council had a discussion in regard to how densities were calculated on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. In calculting the densities in the Comprehensive Guide Plan, staff looked at each parcel on a semi -gross basis. That is, that existing road rights-of-way such as County roads and proposed parks etc. were the only items deducted from the areas or land use segments -prior to placing the density to those individual parcels. Staff did not try to determine the land use designations by deducting all proposed rights-of-way in areas that have not been developed. In using the terminology of net developable land vs. gross developable land, staff primarily used the gross acreage and applied the densities to the individual parcels. When an individual parcel is presented to be developed, then staff would be using the criteria in Ordinance 52, the Zoning Ordinance, to determine the net developable area by the development plan submitted to the City for review at that time. In projecting the saturation population in accordance with the land use plan, staff used the mid-range number of the density range on the gross acreage for its density calculations. What this mans is staff used the number 4.5, which is midway between the R-2 (3-6 dwelling units per acre) on a gross basis. In using an exaTrple to demonstrate has the density calculation is tabulated, look at the R-2 districts which indicate the density of 3-6 dwell- ing units per acre, and if there is a 20 -acre parcel, the calculation would be done as follows: 20 acres X 4.5 dwelling units per acre = 90 dwelling units (or that particular 20 -acre parcel) It is staff's understanding that there was a question between gross and net acreage on doing the calculations. If we would take that same 20 -acre par- cel and take the acreage, or factoring approximately 258 of the gross area as net area, we would then have 15 net acres, and if you used the high end in an R-2 District or the 6 dwelling units per acre, it would be 15 net acres times 6 dwelling units per acre equal 90 dwelling units, or approximately the same total number of dwelling units in using the mid-range density calcula- tion on a gross basis. If the density calculation is done on a net land basis and use the mid-range of an R-2 District of 4.5 dwelling units per acre, the calculations for saturation for population will be about 25-28% lower than the projections that were originally proposed in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Also looking at the calculation done in this fashion when using the net acreage and the mid-range number of 4.5 dwelling units per acre, the gross density would then turn out to be approximately 3.25 dwelling units per acre, or predominantly all single family development. It was not staff's in- tention that all of the R-2 land use designations in the City should develop in a single family character which it would be do using the mid-range density factor and the net acreage. 14 l Thomas L. Hedges Comprehensive Plan Density Calculations April 15, 1982 Page two The way staff uses the land.use plan on a very general basis is that when a developer or land owner is looking at individual parcels on the land use guide and the four residential land use districts, give a range of density per district. Staff uses the 0-3 dwelling units per acre as a guide for single family development. An R-2, 3-6 dwelling units per acre, staff indi- cates at the low end of this range would be single family; the high end of this range could be townhouse development. An R-3 land use density range, 6-12 units per acre, staff indicates low range to be townhouse development, high range to be garden apartments, and R-4, 12 units + per acre would be multiple development. This is a very general basis on viewing the Compre- hensive Guide Plan as to the type of dwelling units which could fit into each specific land use classification. It is also conceivable that you could work a different mixture of housing types such as multiple and single family development in an R-2 parcel and still achieve the Guide Plan range for saturation population. The last thing staff would like to express is that although the City has set up a land use guide and project saturation population, the main cbjec- tive of the Land Use Guide is that the City develops in a manner that is consistent with the infastructures, or all the utilities required to pro- vide nrvide adequate capacities or residential development to come in the future. As mentioned all the way through the Comprehensive Guide Plan is that the Guide Plan is only a guide to use for development purposes. It is the whole intention that the City Council has the sole discretion on determining what type of dwelling unit would be allowed in each of the land use classifica- tions, or between the density ranges provided in the land use calculations. Therefore, the City Council has the discretion on each and every development proposal to determine if single family, duplex, townhouse or multiple on a development by development basis. If the Council can give direction to the staff in regard to how density calculations have been made or how they in- tend to interpret the Land Use Guide Plan will be helpful so the staff is not wasting their time, the developer's time or the City Council's tire with inappropriate development proposals. Hopefully this has explained some of the issues regarding density calcula- tions in regard to the Comprehensive Guide Plan. If anyone has any ques- tions or would like further explanation, please feel free to contact me so we can make this information available. 14'2, y A' MM TO: FnNORAnY MAYOR, CM (pUN M MEMBERS, CITY ADMPUS BATOR ACID CITY DEPARIMFT1fS FRCM: DOUG RF.ID, CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR DATE: APRIL 15, 1982 SURTFCr: EARLY WARNING PROCEDURES Now that the summer storm season is just around the corner, a reminder as to warning systems is in order. 'Last year, after much discussion, the eommmities of northern Dakota County chose to deviate from the procedure that is suggested by the National Weather Service. The Weather Service suggests that the sirens be activated only for very severe thunder storms, tornados and nuclear attacks. Because of our location, on the edge of t that most storms travel from southwest to of ample time to warn our residents if we = severe storm. IFistory has taught us reason, storms which had been only severe warning as they entered Dakota County. to metro radar range, and the fact northeast, we could not be assured waited for the declaration of a another lesson. For some unexplainable in nature, built to very severe without It is for these reasons that the cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, Lakeville and Rosemount have chosen to activate their warning sirens in the event of a severe storm warning. This was a collective decision because our siren systems have—Ye—en designed to provide an overlap. If all are activated, simultaneously, there should be less confusion and a greater likelihood of those outdoors hearing a siren anywhere in northern Dakota County. It must be pointed out that these are all outdoor warning systems. It simply is not practical to design a system which could offer indoor warning. Hopefully, those in their homes, place of business or automobile will be tuned to a radio or TV station which will provide the necessary warning. If/when you hear a warning siren, tune to one of the major radio or television stations. DO NOr Rhone your police dispatch center unless you have an actual eros envy. 'these people will have their hands Bull and will not be able to answer storm re ated questions. the local media do a very good job of keeping people updated. The dispatchers will relay information to the US Weather Service, who in turn are umnitored by all major radio and TV stations. ) 43 AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL APRIL 20, 1982 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 — ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:33 — ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:35 — DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS e.1 A. Fire Department e.3 C. Park Department q.3 B. Police Department P 5 D. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 — CONSENT ITEMS (One motion approves all items) Q.S A. Project 264B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Twin View Manor Streets) �.!D� B. Project 284B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 1st Addition Streets) P,C C. Project 293B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (o(Windcrest 1st Addition Streets) D. Project 308B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing P (Duckwood Trails Streets) Q. 6 E. Contract 80-28, Approve Final Payment/Accept Project (Sanitary Sewer T.B.) 6 F. Approve Grading Permit, Clearview 3rd,Addition (Joe Peterson) 7 G. Approve Grading Permit, Parcel 10-00200-030-32 (Mary Eggum) e 1 H. Approve Grading Permit, Parcel 10-00200-020-30 (Mary Eggum) P I. Contract 81-5, Change Order #J,(Univac Trunk Water Main) e J. MnDOT Cost Participation Agreement #60845, Project 302 (I-494 e Phase Two Trunk Storm Sewer Construction) Pct K. Execution of 911 Grant Agreement 17.L. Determination of Excess Property ?11#,M. Amusement Device Renewals P.Ib N. Trailer Permit Renewals V. 7:00 — PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Final Assessment Hearing, Addition Utilities) 20 B. Final Assessment Hearing, e Utilities) VI. OLD BUSINESS Project 323A (Coachman Land Co. First Project 336A (Tomark First Addition P,22. A. U. S. Homes Corporation for a Preliminary Plat (Lexington Place) Consisting of Approximately 84.62 Acres Located in Part of the W� of the SW1: of Section 14 (east of Lexington Road and north of Wescott Road) 9-4'L B. Discussion Regarding Proposed Conditions for Super America Plat e, q.$ C. Request for 24 Hour Operation to Serve Food for Southfork Restaurant Eagan City Council Agenda April 20, 1982 Page Two VII. NEW BUSINESS Q•5 S A. Signcrafters Outdoor Display, Inc., Charles Peugh, for a Pylon Business sign on Property Located on 2755 Highway 55, Located in Part of the NWk of Section 2. b1 B. Donald Rasmussen for a Variance for a Garage Setback at 1525 Q' Cliff Road, Located in the SE'y of Section 28 67 C. Countryside Builders, Inc., Jerry Lagro, for a Preliminary Plat, Oakwood Heights, Consisting of Approximately 9.59 Acres for Townhouse Development Located in Part of the N� of the SEk of Section 26 (Located east of Wedgewood Drive in the Wilderness Run Road Area) e•g(o D. Midwestern Associates, Orrin Aune, for Preliminary Plat, Lone Oak Heights, Consisting of Approximately 14 Acres Located in Part of the NE'k of the NE'g of Section 9 (Located south of Lone Oak Road and west of Pilot Knob Road) fol E. Zachman Homes, Inc., Steve Ryan, for Preliminary Plat, Cinnamon Q' Ridge 3rd Addition, Consisting of 5 Single Family Lots, 28 Single Family Cluster Lots and 9 Twin Home Lots Located in Part of Outlot B, Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition in Section 30 (Located north of Cliff Road and west of Cedar Avenue Freeway) P•�1� F. Diamond Lake, Inc., Request Public Hearing to Consider IRB Financing in the Amount of $750,000 p 133 G. Final Plat — Countryside Villa (Jerry Lagro) VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 135 A. Joint Burnsville/Eagan Joint Cable Commission Update t3j B. Contract 82-4, Approve Plans & Specifications/Order Advertisement Q for Bids (Twin View Manor 2nd Addition, et al, Streets) 136 C. Brittany Manor, Assessment Petition Consideration IX. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 16, 1982 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval of the April 6, 1982 regular City Council minutes and the April 20, 1982 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for. consideration: DEPARTMENT HEAD:-BUS'INES'SI FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- Fire Chief Childers received a copy of a resolution that was recently adopted by the City Council of Inver Grove Heights at the recommendation of their Volunteer Fire Depart- ment requesting the University of Minnesota regents to reconsider their decision to close the F.I.R.E. Center and to continue funding to assist the volunteer fire fighters. The F.I.R.E. Center has been offered as a service and program through the University of Minnesota for years to volunteer fire departments around the State of Minnesota. The F.I.R.E. Center provides a library equipped with films and training material, training manuals and many other educational resourses that would have to be duplicated by munici- palities if the center is closed. The center also provides a three (3) day training seminar each May for volunteer fire fighters where equipment is demonstrated and fire suppress techniques are presented to the fire fighters. Fire Chief Childers is requesting that the City Council pass a resolution similar to the resolution adopted by the City of Inver Grove Heights requesting that the University of Minnesota Board of Regents reconsider their action to provide this centralized service. A copy of a resolution to be considered by the City of Eagan is enclosed on page o1 for your reference. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny a reso- lution requesting the University of Minnesota regents reconsider their decision to close the F.I.R.E. Center and continue their funding to assist volunteer fire fighters. 0 9 CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION RESOLUTION REQUESTING UNIVERSITY REGENTS TO RECONSIDER THEIR DECISION TO CLOSE F.I.R.E. CENTER AND TO CONTINUE THEIR FUNDING TO ASSIST VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS WHEREAS, the Eagan Volunteer Fire Department is dedicated to providing Fire Education, Fire Prevention and Fire Suppress- ion activities to the residents of Eagan, and, WHEREAS, to provide these services, requires research, coordination, communication and advise, and, WHEREAS, with the cutbacks in the Federal Government, few sources for adsistance exist and., WHEREAS, the F.I.R.E. Center at the University of Minnesota has provided this assistance to the Eagan Volunteer Fire Depart- ment on a regular basis in past years, and, WHEREAS, the University of Minnesota is proposing to close the F.I.R.E. Center for budgeting reasons. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the City Council of Eagan requests the University Regents to reconsider their decis- ion to close the F.I.R.E. Center and to continue their funding to assist the Volunteer Firefighters of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That copies of this resolution be forwarded to the University of Minnesota Board of Regents and neighboring volunteer firefighters. Adopted by the City Council of Eagan this 20 day of April, 1982. City Council Dated: April 20, 1982 City of Eagan ATTEST: E.J. VanOverbeke City Clerk 11 By: Beatta Blomquist, Mayor Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Two 9 POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered at this time for the Police Department. PARK DEPARTMENT C. Park Department --I. Directional Signs to City/Community Parks -- Director of Parks an Recreation raa was regeste by the Council to research the cost of informational/directional signs for locating Eagan community parks. Mr. Vraa is suggesting two options which are available to the City Council. Option 1 would be to install a placard on street signs to indicate the park name and an arrow of direction. Cost of these signs would be approxi- mately $14.00 each and could be made to coincide with the color of exisiting street signs or a different color to stand out better the motorist. These signs would be attached just below the existing signs. Option 2 would be to errect a completely separate sign and post which would be approximately 24" x 24". These individual signs which would also contain the park name would be errected at locations other than the street corner identification signs. However, the cost of these signs would be approximately $35 to $40 each. The higher cost is due to the set up charge required for each sign, plus additional costs for posts. The City Adminis- trator and Director of Parks and Recreation are seeking direction on this issue. 2. Garden Plots -- At the last City Council meeting, a question was raised by City Councilmember Smith as to whether the City has suitable vacant park land which could be used for garden plots on an interim basis. Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa has researched this matter and a copy of his response in enclosed on page- The City Administrator and Director of Parks and Recre- ation wi be seeking direction from the City Council on this issue. 3 0 April 14, 1982 MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR OM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: GARDEN PLOTS At the April 6th council meeting, Councilman Smith questioned whether the City had suitable vacant park land which might be used for garden plots on a interim basis. I briefly reviewed the files and done a windshield survey of some of our existing park land to determine whether such a program could be insti- tuted. Briefly, the City has allowed some gardening to take place on un- developed park land. Primarily, this has been south of River Hills addi- tion in the area beneath the power lines. This area has been used strictly by adjacent residents and has not been offered to members of the community as a whole. I have tried to identify some areas which might be suitable for community use as garden plots and have identified the following: Pilot Knob Park: just east of the tennis courts off of Towerview Road, and Coachman Park: off of Coachman Road. In addition, I looked at the possi- bility of using the recently acquired Rahn Park area, some area by Patrick Eagan Park and an area within Capricorn and Wedgewood Parks. Because of the very limited space available at Patrick Eagan, which the City might find desirable for expansion of its nursery area, I would not like to see this used. And, the Capricorn/Wedgewood area is somewhat inaccessible at this time because of the condition of Lexington Avenue. Rahn Park could be adapted for use although the topography is somewhat rolling by nature. However, this could be utilized, with access off of Nicols Road on an old dirt road. If the council so directs the department could proceed with the de- velopment of a garden program. I would suggest that the program be such that a "permit" be required for a garden area which would be staked by the City. In addition, the permit would seek to identify certain responsibili- ties of those using the plot while limiting the responsibility of the City for its care and protection. Such conditions would be the parties would be responsible for keeping the area neat and clean, providing their own water, and prohibiting the use of chemical herbicides, or the planting of illegal substances etc., etc. Further, the City would indicate that it was not responsible for policing of the garden area or for vandalism that might occur, or for clean up of the area etc. What the council may wish to de- termine is whether a fee might be charged for this service and whether the City should prepare the entire garden area for planting by doing the initial tilling/plowing of the area. In terms of what other communities are charging, fees generally range from $7.00 to $10.00 with the plot ranging in size from approximately 20' x 30' to 15' x 201. Please advise at the earliest opportunity on how the council may wish to proceed. A program format outline could be prepared with greater detail for review, or given sufficient direction, the department could proceed at once instituting the program. IA 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Three 9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D. Public Works Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Public Works Department at this time. 0 � There are a total of fourteen (14) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PROJECT 264B A. Project 264B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Twinview Manor Streets) -- Construction has been completed, final payment made to the contractor and all costs associated with this improvement have been tabulated and the final assessment roll has been prepared. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 264B (Twin View Manor Streets) and order the public hearing to be held on May 18, 1982. PROJECT 284B B. Project 284B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 1st Addition Streets) -- All construction has been com- pleted, final payment made to the contractor and all costs associa- ted with this constuction have been tabulated and the final assess- ment roll has been prepared. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 284B (Windtree 1st Addition Streets) and order the final assessment hearing to be held on May 18, 1982. PROJECT 293B C. Project 293B, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Windcrest 1st Addition Streets) -- Construction has been completed for this project, final contract payments have been made and all costs associated with this project have been tabulated and the final assessment roll has been completed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 293B (Windcrest 1st Addition Streets) and order the final assessment hearing to be held on May 18, 1982. a 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Four. D. Project 308B, Receive (Duckwood Trails Streets) final payments made to with this project have rolls have been prepared. 0 PROJECT 308B Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing All construction has been completed, the contractor and all costs associated been tabulated and the final assessment ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To receive the final assess- ment roll for Project 308B (Duckwood Trails Streets) and order the final assessment hearing to be held May 18, 1982. CONTRACT 80-28 - FINAL PAYMENT E. Contract 80-28, Approve Final Payment/Accept Project (Sanitary Sewer T.B.) -- Contract 80-28 provided for the internal televising of the sanitary sewer lines that were constructed during 1980 and 1981 in addition to sanitary sewer lines within the Cedar Grove 1st Addition. The City has received a request for final payment from the contractor through our consulting engineering firm along with a certification of compliance to City approved plans and speci- fications. The final report has been reviewed by the City public works personnel and found to be acceptable, and subsequently final payment to the contractor is recommended. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the fourth and final payment to Professional Services Group, Inc., in the amount of $814.87 for Contract 80-28. GRADING PERMIT - CLEARVIEW 3RD F. Approve Grading Permit, Clearview 3rd Addition (Joe Peterson) The City has received an application for a grading permit from Mr. Joe Peterson for the proposed Clearview 3rd Addition which consists of Lot 6, Block 1, Clearview 1st Addition adjacent to Beecher Drive and Clover Lane. The grading permit has been approved, insurance certificates and bonds have been submitted and the appro- priate fee has been paid. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the grading permit for Clearview 3rd Addition (Joe Peterson). R-1 0 • Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Five - GRADING PERMIT - MARV EGGLTM G. Approve Grading Permit, Parcel 10-00200-030-32 (Mary Eggum) The City has received an application for a grading permit from Mary Eggum to fill the existing vacant lot located on the north side of Blue Gentian Road immediately west of the first house on Blue Gentian Road off of T. H. 55. The grading permit has been submitted, reviewed and approved by staff. All insurance certifi- cates, fees and performance bonds have been submitted, reviewed and approved by staff. This property owner intends to place approximately 19,000 c.y. of the excess fill generated from the 494-35E interchange project, the bid letting of which is scheduled for April 23. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the grading permit for Parcel 10-00200-030-32 as requested by Mr. Mary Eggum. GRADING PERMIT - MARV EGGLTM H. Approve Grading Permit, Parcel 10-00200-020-30 (Mary Eggum) The City has received an application for a grading permit from Mr. Mary Eggum for the above referenced parcel which is located on the north side of T. H. 55 across from J. I. Case Company. Mr. Eggum is proposing to place approximately 40,000 c.y. of excess material generated from the 494-35E interchange project proposed to be let by MnDOT on April 23. The grading plan has been submit- ted, reviewed and approved by staff. All required insurance certi- ficates, performance bonds and fees have been submitted, reviewed and approved by staff. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the grading permit for Parcel 10-00200-020-30 as submitted by Mr. Mary Eggum. 7 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Six. CONTRACT 81-5 I. Contract 81-5, Change Order #2 (Univac Trunk Water Main) -- The Public Works Director has reviewed with Bob Rosene, Consulting Engineer, the future trunk water main distribution requirements through the Univac property associated with future well sites. This was done in anticipation of the existing semi -conductor faci- lity construction presently being erected on the Univac property. Due to the planned future location of various future wells, there will be a requirement for a trunk water main crossing and several locations of proposed access roads to this semi -conductor facility. Therefore, it is most economical and feasible to provide these water main crossings prior to this roadway construction to minimize future expensive restoration costs and access problems to this semi -conductor facility. Therefore, it has been determined that the most economical way this could be accomplished would be to add this work to the existing contract that is presently providing for the installation of sanitary sewer and water main facilities to this Univac semi -conductor facility. It is estimated that this additional work will amount to an addition of approximately (this is under negotiation) $15,OOO.to the contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve Change Order #2 to Contract 81-5 to Barbarossa & Sons, Inc., in the amount of approximately $15,000. (The correct figure will be given Monday.) MnCOST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT #60845 J. MnDot Cost Participation Agreement #60845, Project 302 (I-494 Phase Two Trunk Storm Sewer Construction) -- On April 6, 1982, the City Council formally approved plans and specifications for phase two construction of I-494 and its related trunk storm sewer facility which provides for the easterly extension of I-494 from T. H. 45 to approximately 0.35 miles west of T. H. 149. This project provides for the excavation and construction of the major interchange of I-494 and I -35E. It also provides for trunk storm sewer construction which will ultimately provide for the gravity outlet for O'Neill Pond (FP -1). Because a portion of this trunk storm sewer construction provides for the drainage outlet for the City of Eagan, a cost participation agreement must be executed between MnDOT and the City of Eagan providing for the City's finan- cial share of these construction costs. Because of an increase in federal interstate participation in the storm sewer construction, the City's originally estimated share of this phase two trunk storm sewer cost has been reduced from $138,000 to approximately $78,000. This agreement has been reviewed in detail by the Public Works Director and found to be in conformance with past standards and agreements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve MnDOT cost participation agreement #60845 for the phase two trunk storm sewer and outlet for Project 302. V111 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Seven 911 GRANT AGREEMENT K. Execution of 911 Grant Agreement -- Approximately two (2) months ago, the City Council reviewed the intent of Dakota County to fund the 911 emergency telephone system for the cities in Dakota County. This item was approved by the Dakota County Board and a resolution passed December 22, 1981. The grant to be received by the City of Eagan from Dakota County is estimated at $22,367. The formalized grant agreement has been received and is in order for execution by the City Clerk and Mayor. The grant will be in the amount of $22,367. A copy of the grant agreement is enclosed on pages ID through _ 1 for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve final execution of the 911 grant in the amount of $22,367 for the 911 emergency telephone system as awarded by Dakota County. 0 E 0 GRANT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Dakota County Board of Commissioners, hereinafter the Board, and the City of _ Eagan hereinafter the City, are desirous of establishing 911 Emergency, Telephone Service within the municipality, and WHEREAS, the Board by Resolution 01-718, adopted December 22, 1981, has authorized the grant of $ 22.367 to the City to reimburse the City for the expense of establishing a Public Safety Answering Point, hereinafter PSAP, within the 911 system, and WHEREAS, the City is willing to establish, maintain, and operate the PSAP within the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board and the City do mutually agree as follows: 1. The Board will reimburse the City $ 22,367 for the expense of establishing the PSAP to be operated within the City, such reimbursement to be made in January, 1983. 2. The City will establish, maintain and operate the PSAP for the City within the countywide 911 system. 3. The City will assume the expense of purchasing the power supply unit for the operation of its PSAP and will so pur- chase the unit. 4. The Board shall be entitled to receipt of the 208 I reimbursement from the U.S. Department of Transportation for installation of the 911 system. 5. The City will hold harmless and defend the Board and Dakota County from any claims arising through the establishment, installation, operation, or maintenance of the PSAP - 911 system within the City. 6. The City agrees to comply with all laws and regulations, both federal and state, relating to the expenditure I of these funds, including but not limited to those laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sex, or handicap. Page 1 of 2 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed. Approved as to form: form: COUNTY OF DAKOTA Assistant County gttorney/Date By Approved as to execution: Gene Atkins Cha man Board of Comc Commissioners Assistant County Attorney/Date Date of Signature Attest Approved by Dakota County Board Carl D. Onischuk, Auditor Resolution No. 81-718. Date of Signature This instrument drafted by: DMF CITY OF Dakota County Attorney's Office Dakota County Government Center By Hastings, Minnesota 55033 Title Telephone: (612) 437-0438 Date of Signature Attest Title Date of Signature C-82-14 page 2 of 2 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Eight EXCESS PROPERTY DETERMINATION L. Determination of Excess Property -- The Director of Finance is requesting that the City declare eight (8) items of equipment as excess property and authorize the sale of this property at the Police Auction scheduled for May 22, 1982. Presently, this equip- ment is being stored in the basement of the Police Department and is of no value or use to our local government operations. For a copy of the list which is recommended as surplus City property, refer to page 13 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the sale of surplus City property as determined by the Director of Finance. Ix E MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR VAN OVERBEKE DATE: APRIL 13, 1982 SUBJECT: SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY n The following equipment is currently being stored in the basement of the Police building and has not been used recently in City operations: 1 — Adler Typewriter (Universal 20) 1 — Burroughs Calculator (C4300) 2 — Underwood Olivetti Calculators 1 — Olivetti Calculator 1 — Scriptomatic Addressing Machine 1 — A.B. Dick Mimeograph (Model 418) 1 — Set Realistic Wireless Intercoms I would like the City Council to declare it to be surplus property and authorize its being sold with the Police Department unclaimed property on Saturday, May 22, 1982. As near as I can tell, this equipment is of no value to the City. Yl t -WL Direct of Finance 13 0 6 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Nine. AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS M. Amusement Device Renewals -- The 1982 Amusement Device Renewals are in order for consideration. Enclosed on page/ is a list of businesses and the number of machines for considerate . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER ment divice renewals. /4 To approve the 1982 amuse - 0 0 1982 AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS BUSINESS NUMBER OF MACHINES Amore Pizza 5 Deli 3 machines (New owner will be Carbones) 1665 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan MN 55121 Cedarvale Shopping Center 5 machines National Amusement Co 3541 Glenhurst St Louis Park MN 55416 Cedarvale Lanes over 15 machines 3883 Beau d'Rue Drive Eagan MN 55122 Eagandale Club 3 machines 3330 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55121 LaFonda 3 machines 3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan MN 55122 Mr D's Pizza 2 machines 3904 Beau d'Rue Drive Eagan MN 55122 Nicols Landing over 15 machines 3998 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan MN 55122 Pizza Hut 2 machines 3992 Sibley Memorial Hwy Eagan MN 55122 Southfork 3 machines 4185 So Robert Trail Eagan MN 55123 Starks Halfway over 15 machines 3125 Dodd Road Eagan MN 55121 15 Council - Data 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Ten 1982 TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS N. Trailer Permit Renewals -- The 1982 trailer permit renewal list is enlcosed on page 17 for your review. Chief Building Inspector Peterson has and- all trailers to determine if they are in order for renewal. The City Administrator will provide a report to the City Council during discussion of Consent Items if there are any trailer permits that should not be renewed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the 1982 trailer permit renewals. IG 1982 TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS Name & Address Tripp Oil 3085 Hwy 13 Eagan MN 55121 Sharon Staff 1430 Rocky Lane Eagan 24N 55123 Earl Marotzke 535 Gun Club Road Rosemount MN 55068 Wilfred Heuer 3340 Dodd Road Eagan MN 55121 G Wm Smith 3587 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 Alwin & Lyle Schultz 1315 Carriage Hills Drive Eagan MN 55121 Edmund Schwanz 810 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan MN 55123 Levi Heuer 1585 Deerwood Drive Eagan MN 55122 Dakota Homes Doug Isaacson 3660 Dodd Rd Eagan MN 55123 Council - Date 0 Number & Explanation 2 office use 3 care of mother 9 family home 12 trailer for son 17 sons home fince the 60's 20 ' family home 22 mothers home 37 Geo Miesters home 41 office use 17 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Eleven `PUBLIG 'HEAR'INCS! PROJECT 323A 0 A. Project 323A, Final Assessment Hearing (Coachman Land Company First Addition - Utilities) -- On March 16, 1982, the final assess- ment roll for the above referenced project was presented to the City Council and the final assessment hearing subsequently scheduled for April 20. Enclosed on page �r is a final assessment hearing tabulation relating to cost per unit for the individual utility improvements that were installed as they compare to the rates quoted in the feasibility report at the time of the public hearing. The final assessment rates result in a $126 per unit overrun (6.5%) from those rates quoted at the time of the public hearing. This is a direct result of a request received from the developer per- taining to the extension of the sewer and water services beyond the right of way to a point located ten feet from each individual quadrominium unit. All proposed final assessment costs associated with this project have been forwarded to the developer for his review and comments. To date, no objections have been received by staff. All legal notices have been sent to all affected property owners and published in the legal newspaper. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To close the public hearing and approve, modify or deny the final assessment roll as presented and direct the staff to certify the roll to the County Auditor for collection. IQ FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 323 A SUBDIVISION/AREA: Coachman Land Co. 1st Addition FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: 4-20-82 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES 0 Area Lx� Laterals QService M Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM ri Area Fx Laterals $457.46 $ 540.00 411.11 114.50 296.32 388.00 -SANITARY ❑ Area x❑ Laterals xx Service E] Lat. Benefit/Trunk STREETS IJ Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $ 332.38 $ 595.00 411.10 114.50 173.26 203.00 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 28 Units and 2 Outlots (52 Unit Equiv.) NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 Years RATE OF INTEREST: 12.5% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $166,531.47 (80 Units at $2,081.63 each) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 81-7 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 4-7-81 K 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twelve PROJECT 336A 40 B. Project 336A, Final Assessment Hearing (Tomark 1st Addition - Utilities) -- Tomark 1st Addition consists of two lots, each one containing a multi -unit condominium complex. Enclosed on page J\ is a final assessment summary information sheet indicating tT�inal assessment rates associated with the individual utilities as compared to the rates quoted in the feasibility report at the time of public hearing. The final assessment figures are $2.,032.67 per lot (2.67) less than those rates quoted in the feasibility report at the public hearing. Final assessment figures have been forwarded to the developer prior to the final assessment hearing, and, to date, no objections have been received by staff. All legal notices have been sent to affected property owners and published in the legal newspapers. This final assessment roll was presented to the City Council on March 16 with the final assessment hearing scheduled for April 20. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To close the public hearing and approve, modify or deny the assessment roll as presented and direct the staff to certify the roll to the County Auditor for collection. IN 0 0 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 336A SUBDIVISION/AREA: TOMARK IST ADDITION FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: 4-20-82 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F.R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES OArea E0 Laterals $16,781.21- $19,140.00 Service (Avg.) Lat. Benefit/Trunk $6,247.42 $5,740.00 STORM (Avg.) Q Area $10,896.36 $10,894.63 ® Laterals $13,087.75 $15,335.00 STREETS Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. $2,831.68 $3,090.00 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 2 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 Years RATE OF INTEREST: 12.5% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $153,863.91 (2 lots at $76,936.96 each) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 6-16-81 a. 81-7 FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES Area Laterals $20,866.90 $19,050.A0 ❑ Service (Avg.) 0 Lat. Benefit/Trunk $6,225.65 $5,720.00 STREETS Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. $2,831.68 $3,090.00 NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 2 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 Years RATE OF INTEREST: 12.5% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $153,863.91 (2 lots at $76,936.96 each) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 6-16-81 a. 81-7 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Thirteen OLD BOS'INESS' PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LEXINGTON PLACE A. C. S. Homes Corporation for Preliminary Plat (Lexington Place) Consisting of Approximately 84.62 Acres -- An application was re- ceived for a preliminary plat entitled Lexington Place consisting of approximately 84.62 acres and containing 28 condominium units for a total of 672 dwelling units. The APC held a public hearing on February 25, 1982 and is recommending approval of the preliminary plat subject to conditions as outlined in the minutes and staff report. The City Council reviewed the recommendation of the Advi- sory Planning Commission at the March 16, 1982 meeting. There were a number of questions raised by members of the City Council that required additional information to be prepared by City staff. Those questions are addressed in a memorandum prepared by the City Administrator to the City Planner found on pages 2, 3 through a,ar . The City Planner has prepared a lengthy report, spending a great deal of time discussing the questions and pursuing answers to the questions with several suburban communities as well as state and metropolitan agencies. Because the nature of the questions require in many cases attitudes and positions of employees who work for neighboring cities or state and metropolitan agencies, it was a difficult exercise for the City Planner to gather the and write the data so it does not appear to be a position of the City staff. Please regard this memorandum as fact finding. It is not intended to be pursuasive. For a copy of the report which was prepared by the City Planner, refer to pages 0157 through Also, a copy of the APC minutes for the Fe rub ary 25, 1982 Zt ng are enclosed on pages -31 through 6r For additional information on this item, please refer to the amity Planner's report, a copy of which was enclosed on pages 46 through 59 in the March 16, 1982 packet. Also, a letter from Tie City Attorney's office was enclosed on page 60 and a copy of the Advisory Park & Recreation Committee recommendations was enclosed on page 64. If any member of the City Council desires new copies of any of this information, please contact the City Administrator's office and this infor- mation will be included with the administrative packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the preliminaryplat for Lexington Place as recommended for approval by the APC. 1�, 0 • MEMO TO: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE FROM: .CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 24, 1982 SUBJECT: PROPOSED LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION/CITY COUNCIL ACTION OF 3-16-82 At the City Council meeting of 3-16-82, the preliminary plat pro- posed as "Lexington Place Addition" was continued until the April 20, 1982 City Council meeting. The following is a copy of the motion: "I move that the application for preliminary plat approval of Lexington Place Addition be continued until the April 20, 1982, City Council meeting to allow the City staff, at the direction of the City Administrator, an opportunity to review the impact and the effect on the welfare and safety of the present and future Eagan residents including those that would occupy smaller than normal sized residential condominium units including a recommenda- tion as to whether such units should be permitted and encouraged for development in the City.', The City Council is also requesting that the following information be evaluated and reviewed and that a report be prepared for Council review at the April 20 meeting. 1. Review the U. S. Homes developments in Apple Valley and Bloomington. How did those cities address the mini -condo units? What is the history of the rezoning in Bloomington that allowed U. S. Homes Corporation to construct the condominium project? What were the conditions and stipulations, if any? What are the trends for affordable housing? Examine local real estate, metropolitan council, lending institutions and other agencies. 4. Can by-laws or development agreements restrict the number of studio units allowed for rental? Example might be 20 percent. 5. Are there studio units of comparable size suburban areas or central cities? What unit? Are these units owner occupied, and centage? 23 located in the is the cost per if so, what per - 0 . Lexington Place Memo March 24, 1982 Page Two 6. Can units described in #5 above be toured by City officials? 7. Is it possible to loop the fish hook cul de sac as illus- trated on the south side of the proposed plat of Lexington Place Addition? 8. Other applicable information. I would like this report presented to my office in final draft by Thursday, April 15, 1982. Please solicit the assistance of Liz and Dave for this project. l -Z ity Administrato cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney �i TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: APRIL 15, 1982 RE: RESPONSE TO OUESTIONS IN MEMO DATED I i• •,* • • 019 QUESTION 1 - Review the U. S. Homes developments in Apple Valley and Bloomington. How did those cities address the mini -condo units? Staff has contacted the Apple Valley Planning Department, and they have in- formed us that Orrin Thampson has made a submittal in Apple Valley which is part of an overall planned development. The original proposal was for two 70 -unit ondominium buildings. Since the original concept was submitted, the applicant, Orrin Thcmmpson, has revised that concept to the 24 -unit build- ings which are the same as being proposed in the City of Eagan. At the pre- sent time, the Apple Valley Planning Cannission has approved tyro 24 -unit buildings with a mix of 6 efficiencies, 7 one-bedroan and 11 two-bedroan units. This item will be scheduled on an April Apple Valley City Council meeting as a consent item on the agenda for approval. In discussing the total site with Apple Valley, it appears that the site is smaller in size and there may be a maximum of 90-100 dwelling units for the overall condo- minium project. In discussing the mix of efficiencies, one and two bedroan units with Apple Valley, it appears that Apple Valley supports the smaller sized efficiency and one -bedroom units. It has been determined that the smaller units will lessen the services that are required in the community such as the number of children that would be generated in the project for schools and police, because the number of people is less than what a pro- ject would be if there would be more two and three bedroom units. It is staff's understanding that the City of Apple Valley encourages the smaller unit vs. the two and three bedroom units because of services and demands that the smaller units place on the city. In discussing the Bloomington condominium project, it is staff's under- standing that Bloanxigton has approved a ondominium project, but there are no efficiency units. The entire condominium project in Bloomington consists of 1 and. 2 bedrooms. Therefore, Bloomington has not had any de- velopment proposals with efficiency, or mini -condominium, units. QUESTION 2 - 4dzat is the history of the rezoning in Bloomington that al- lowed U. S. Hames Corporation to construct the condoninium project? Mat were the conditions and stipulations, if any? It is staff's understanding according to the City of Bloomington that Orrin Thompson, or U. S. Homes, submitted an application for preliminary plat approval in 1977. In 1977, the City of Bloomington approved the develop- ment to consist of single family homes and preserved acreage for multiple or condominium units. The single family hares have been constructed since 1977. In late 1980, early 1981, Orrin Thomason submitted the site plans for the condominium project. At that time, there were concerns from the as Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Addition Page two surrounding neighborhood of which Orrin Thompson had constructed the single family hones. The oondmAniun project took approximately 10 weeks to be approved by the City of Bloomington once Orrin Thompson had submitted plans for the condominium units. The condominium project consisted of 72 unit buildings with underground parking. The mix of the units were 1 and 2 bed- room units. There were no efficiencies proposed in this development. In discussing the studio, or mini -condominium unit, with the Bloomington staff, they have stated that Bloomington presently has an ordinance which requires minimun square footages for the type of dwelling unit. There is a provi- sion in the Bloomington ordinance for efficiency units of having a minimum of 400 square feet. A one -bedroom unit must contain a minimum of 650 square feet, a two-bedroom unit a mininmmt of 800 square feet and a three-bedroom unit containing a minimum of 950 square feet. In inquiring has Bloomington :! wouldlook at the efficiency, or mini -condo, it is speculation at this time because no efficiencies, or mini -condos were proposed with the Orrin Thoupr son development. In theorizing with the Bloomington staff, it appears the surrounding citizens have the same concerns as in Fagan. QUESTION 3 - What are the trends for afforable housing? Pyramine local real estate, metropolitan council, lending institutions and other agencies. Before staff tries to present trends from different organizations that have been listed in the question, staff requests that the Council first evaluate the trends which have been occurring the City of Fagan, or at least from 1977. In the middle of 1977 through 1979, the majority of the platting which had occurred in Eagan was mainly single family development proposals. The closer we get to 1979, the smaller the lots became in development pro- posals. However, the majority of the plats were single family. In 1980, there had been a change from single family to quadraminium and townhouse lots which consisted of most of the development activity with maybe one or two condominium projects proposed and fewer and fewer single family lots being proposed. In 1981, the developments consisted primarily of quadra- minium and condominium development proposals. And, in 1982, primarily townhouse and condominium developments, with the exception of one develop- ment proposal which still had small single family lots, were proposed. In looking at the trends, staff feels Eagan is the best place to look as to what has occurred with development proposals. Staff has contacted Glasrud Development Co. who is one of the larger condo- miniun builders in the metropolitan area. In 1979, Glasrud Development Co. had constructed a major project in downtown Minneapolis. The project con- sisted of condominium units consisting of 1 and 2 bedroom unit, and the majority of that development was 2 -bedroom units. In the last year, Glas- rud Development Co. constructed a project called "Citywalk" in downtown St. Paul. The project consisted mostly of 1 -bedroom units with some condo- minium units of 550-600 square feet. As the years have gone by, the units have been getting smaller and smaller according to Mr. Steve Holland, who is one of the Vice Presidents of Glasrud Development Co. At the present time, it is staff's understandingthat they are not involved in any new .16 0 • Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Iexington Place Addition Page three proposals for condominium units. However, if they were proposing a pro- ject, it is staff's understanding that the units would be smaller than the two projects listed above. Staff has also contacted HUD, Housing and Urban Development, in Minnesota. It is the staff's understanding that a few years ago, HUD would not subsi- dize any efficiency units. In the past few years, HUD has changed their standards and is realistically trying to look at the market and what mar- ket rate housing is at the present time. In multiple dwellings, HUD has established maxinnnn square footage for efficiency, one -bedroom, two-bedroom, three-bedroom and four-bedroom dwelling units and will not subsidize any- thing over these square footage requirements. The current maximum square footage requirement on efficiency units is 415 square feet, 540 square foot maximum for a one -bedroom unit, 800 square foot maximuu for a two- bedroom unit, 1,050 square foot maximum for a three-bedroom unit and 1,150 square foot maximum for a four-bedroom unit. In trying to determine what constitutes the health, safety requirements for an individual for living space, HUD has indicated that there is really no minimum square footage which determines the health, safety requirement for an individual dwell- ing unit. HUD has established a tern called furnishable design which means that instead of a minimum square footage requirement, HUD will look at the design of the unit in regard to pertinent furniture, appliances, beds, etc. to see if the unit appears to be liveable and has enough square footage around these furnishings to make it liveable. In reviewing efficiency units in accordance with the UBC, the Uniform Building Code, which is presently adopted in the City of Eagan as minimum square footage requirements, in efficiency units, the minimum square foot- age allowed for these units is 220 square feet superficial floor area, which means all floor area excluding closet and a bathroom. So, if one looks at 220 square feet as the minimum for living and dining and kitchen and adds square footage for a closet and a bathroom, an efficiency unit could meet the State Building Code at approximately 270-280 square feet, satisfying all requirements of the State Building Code. The State Building Code also addresses that for more than two persons, there shall be 100 square feet of additional floor area for each person in excess of two people. So, according to the present code, the efficiency units pro- posed could house a maxim= of four people according to square footage requirements in the State Building Code. Staff has also contacted the Housing Department of the Metropolitan Coun- cil. The Metropolitan Council staff has indicated that in the past years, the units are becoming smaller. They have also indicated that there are some smaller condominium units being processed by the A-95 review. How- ever, these units are elderly complexes, and would not be under the same criteria as a market rate condominium project. At the present time, there is no market rate for sale of condominium units that they know of that contain efficiency units. There are condominium units, however, being processed through the A-95 review which consist of one and two bedroom dwelling units. a-7 Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Addition Page four The staff does expect units to become smaller to meet the demand of the market. In discussing condominium units with surrounding suburbs, there are condo- miniun projects being proposed with efficiency units. Two development proposals located by staff are as follows: 1) There is a development proposal in Edina which is called Edinborough consisting of office buildings and condominium dwelling units. The condominium project will consist of approximately 600 dwelling units and there will be in excess of 10% of the units being efficiency or mini-condeninium units. 2) The second development is located in Woodbury which is called Alder - wood. The developer will be proposing 72 condeninium units where 20% of the units will be efficiency. Presently, the developer has a 24 -unit building up and there are models available for review. The last item staff discussed with the Metropolitan Council is in regard to how many communities in the Metropolitan area have square footage require- ments in their ordinances. The Metropolitan staff has indicated that approx- imately 208 of the metropolitan oommmnities have square footage requirements, 80% do not. The Metropolitan Council staff indicated that Policy 39, the criteria set up to review housing standards and also one of the criterion the Metropolitan Council uses in grant applications for Lawton and other grants, states that communities with square footage requirements lose points in the Policy 39 review. Tb summarize cements from the different agencies mentioned above, one common element always came forth; in regard to the cost and financing of the individual units that are under construction, the cost of financing has became so expensive that the affordability of single family homes and large units has diminished substantially. It is not that people looking for housing units do not want single family hones or large units; it's a simple factor that the cost of these units have become so expensive that the people cannot afford to purchase the larger units any longer. If financing, or money, became available or cheaper, there would be lar- ger units constructed. However, persons that staff talked to in'research- ing statistics for this report spoke favorably of cheaper money or better financing becoming available within the near future. The last item staff would like to bring to the attention of the City Coun- cil is the housing plan which this City had prepared in August of 1979 and adopted by the City Council. The housing plan indicates that the City of Eagan has adopted a 1980 to 1990 goal of developing 1,474 new modest cost market rate dwelling units. The term "market rate" placed a value range from $40,000-$60,000 per dwelling unit. The City has indicated that they would develop approximately 147 modest cost units per year for the next 10 years. In going through this housing plan, there are a number of things which may be outdated even from 1979. Orae item could be income M 0 0 Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Page five limits which statistics were taken from November, 1978 and also, the cost of modest cost housing based from 1979. The last item in regard to the housing plan staff would like to point out is Table 12 on Page 24 which identifies numbers of units per neighbor- hood. According to this exhibit, it indicates that neighborhood 14 should have approximately 50 modest cost units. The development, Lexington Place, would provide more units than what is projected by this housing plan. The other neighborhoods should also be looked at such as 29, 30 and 33 where the City has indicated 200 potential modest cost units and is it reason- able to place this many units in the projected neighborhood as listed in this chart? In reviewing the housing plan, staff has received additional statistical data regarding population and households frau the 1980 census. There are a number of categories that should be looked at to determine the marketability and the type of population that existed in Eagan in 1980. Staff could prepare an analysis of this statistical data to support many condos or efficiency units. There is also information that could be used to support other types of dwelling units. Some of the interesting factors for general information are: Number 2 - Count of Families - 5,231 Numbers 33 and 34 - Median Number of Persons per occupied housing unit and the Mean Number of persons per occupied housing unit Number 4 - Count of housing units of 7,206 for a total number of 41 non -condominium housing units by occupancy status, owner - occupied - 3,961 dwelling units, vacant for sale - 115. Number 26 - Occupied Housing Units by Tenure, owner occupied - 4,399 dwelling units, Renter occupied - 2,425 Number 38 - Value of Owner Occupied Noncondominiumu Housing Units by Price - staff would just like to note that there are 221 dwelling units in the City of Eagan that are an estimated value of $49,999 or less. The median caner -occupied house is listed at $70,900. Number 43 - Contract Rent of Renter -Occupied Units - the rent struc- tures and the number of renters in the structure, the median rent in rental units for the City is $291. In trying to determine a market for smaller, or mini -condominium units, it is interesting to look at the Number 33 - Occupied Housing Units by Number of Persons and Tenure - presently there are 1,561 one or two person fami- lies presently renting structures in the City of Eagan. 'L 9 Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Addition Page six Staff has included this two-page summary of the housing statistics which have been provided by the Minnesota Analysis and Planning Systems. These two pages have been enclosed for your review and hopefully you can conduct your own analysis of the housing statistics for the City of Eagan. QUESTIM 4 - Can by-laws or development agreements restrict the number of studio units allowed for rental? Example might be 20%. Staff has reviewed this question with the City Attorney. He has indicated that you can in almost all cases restrict or provide any conditions in development agreements that are agreeable by both parties. In reviewing the housing plan in regard to the number of modest cost housing provided by section, there may be some agreement worked out between the developer and the City. However, placing a percentage of studio units allowed per development may be challenged. Presently, the City of Eagan does not have an ordinance or criteria pertaining to the zoning ordinance which reflects limiting the number of studio or condominium units in a develop- ment proposal. It is not to say that the City cannot establish criteria in accordance with the housing plan and other criteria to come up with a Percentage that could be a number worked from the statistics and amend the zoning ordinance to require a certain percentage of the units could be studio or mini-condcminium units. This could be done by determining the percentage of market rate housing units established on Table 12, Page 24 and find out what the percentage is of the total number of dwelling units for that particular section. Staff would request that the City Attorney research the legality of providing a certain percentage by amend- ment to determine legally whether this language can be included in the zoning ordinance, or would it be considered exclusionary by restricting the number of one kind of dwellingunit in a certain or district. development proposal QUESTION 5 - Are there studio units of comparable size located in the sub- urban areas of central cities? What is the cost per unit? Are these units owner occupied, and if so, what percentage? In reviewing studio or mini -condo units with the surrounding communities, there are a number of studio or mini-oondo and efficiency units which have been constructed in the past as rental projects. The cities I have talked to do not have numbers on has many studio units are available in their com- munities. They also do not know haw many units have been converted to con- dominium and sold for owner -occupied units. There is no number staff can cane up with at this tine as to the number of units and percentages of ef- ficiency units which are rented or owner -occupied. As stated earlier in this report, there have been very few projects where efficiency, or mini- amdos, have been proposed in the metropolitan area. In this report, staff has been able to locate two projects - one which is under construction - the other still in the planning stage. In discussing studios, or efficien- cy units with other planners in other communities, there have been inquir- ies regarding the efficiency units, but not too many have been constructed at this time. 0 Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Addition Page seven 0 QUESTION 6 - Can units described in #5 above be toured by City officials? Staff has contacted the City of Woodbury, Dwight Picha, Community Development Director for Woodbury, and he has indicated that he would be available Fri- day, April 16, 1982 at 1:00 at the Woodbury City Hall to take any represen- tatives from Eagan on a tour of Aldenwood Condominiums. If any of the marc bers who cannot make the tour on Friday at 1:00, the sales office is open on Saturday and their hours are from Noon to 6:00. You may want to call Alder - wood Condominiums, 738-7777 to make sure there is a sales person at the con- dominium units. Staff has also enclosed a brochure of Aldeswood Condominiums describing the two different efficiency units and also a site location map of where Alderwood Condominiums are located. QUESTION 7 - Is it possible to loop the fish hook cul de sac as illustrated on the south side of the proposed plat of Lexington Place Addi- tion? Staff has reviewed this request with the applicant, and the applicant has in- dicated that physically the loop street could be provided. However, looking at the topography, it is determined a substantial amount of grading would have to be completed and some trees would be lost if this street would turn in to a loop street system. The applicant has looked at alternatives by pro- viding turnaround areas in two different areas to provide for traffic circu- lation vs. running the loop street in this proposed area. The applicant will provide sketches at the April 20th meeting showing the physical constraints incurred by looping the street back to the public right-of-way. QUESTION 8 - Other applicable information. The last item staff would like to address is in regard to cost of a unit at today's financing and what the debt -free income is for an individual's financing qualifications, not in particular this dwelling unit, but for any dwelling unit that costs in the range of $33,000-$50,000. The chart below will list the mortgage amount, what the monthly payment is, what the yearly payment is and what the qualifying income will have to be. This chart has been set up on a 30 -year mortgage at 15-,8. Obviously, there are many different creative financing techniques on the market today. However, this information is intended to give the Council an idea of the interest amount and what the cost of money has done to the type of unit a person with an income can purchase. 30 -YEAR MORTGAGE PIAN AT 15'x% INTEREST MORTGAGE MTHLY PAYMENT TAXES,INSURANCEASSOC.FEES YR TOTAL QUALIFY.INCQ� $33,000 $443.54 $100.00 $6,522.48 $21,198.06 35,000 456.59 100.00 6,679.08 21,707.01 40,000 521.86 100.00 7,462.32 24,252.54 45,000 587.04 100.00 8,244.48 26,794.56 50,000 652.26 100.00 9,027.12 29,338.14 11 Thomas L. Hedges April 13, 1982 Lexington Place Addition Page eight As you can see, qualifying incomes on any type of purchase has increased where it is difficult for single individuals, or couples just starting out, to quali- fy for owner -occupied housing in this market at today's current interest rates. In reviewing the Lexington Place proposal, the applicant has indicated that the units will be owner -occupied. The present zoning of this site would al- low for owner -occupied or for rental units. Owner -occupied dwelling units with a homeowner's association taking care of the maintenance and the upkeep of the buildings is a much better situation than having the proposed complex being an all rental project. The owner -occupied homeowner's association de- velopments do have a good track record in the City of Eagan in regard to landscaping, maintenance and upkeep of the individual units. Staff can refer to different rental projects in the City where the upkeep has not been as good as the owner-ocoupied units with a homeowner's association. In determining the land values, or property values within the area, it is staff's understanding that the awner-occupied homeowner's association would tend to keep the property values higher than if it would be a rental project. In determining the mix of the project by looking at the individual units from the outside, it would be impossible to tell if the units within the building are small or large units. However, the upkeep of the building and the mainte- nance of the exterior is a much more visible indicator as to what the -proper- ty value of the individual project would be. Hopefully, staff has addressed the concerns presented by the City Administra- tor for review. If staff has not addressed any particular item, or if any- one would like additional information on a particular item, please feel free to contact me at the Eagan City Hall. DCR/jack 3a 1980 CENSUS DATA (SUMMARY TAPE FILE 1) MINNESOTA ANALYSIS AND PLANNING SYSTEMS :_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________. PAGE 1 OF 2 : POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD ITEMS :SUMMARY _ CODE AND ______________________________ TYPE: 27(PLACE) 1063 AREA NAME: EAGAN CITY 1 COUNT OF --------------------------- 6 PERSONS BY -_______________________ 11 MEDIAN AGE OF 2 COUNT ____________________________-___: OF ; 34 MEDIAN NUMBER OF PERSONS PER ALL PERSONS ' GENDER PERSONS BY FAMILIES • OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT TOTAL20700 : GENDER ;__________________________________________________________. 5231 2.68 URBAN 20700 : TOTAL 29.9 : 3 COUNT OF 35 MEAN NUMBER OF PERSONS PER URBAN FRINGE 0 : FEMALE 10398 : FEMALE 25.9 : HOUSEHOLDS OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT RURAL MALE 10302 : MALE 25.9 : 6824 : 3.02 10 POPULATION BY 7 PERSONS BY 14 PERSONS 15 YEARS AND OVER HOUSEHOLDS BY PERSONS AND TYPE AGE AND GENDER RACE BY MARITAL STATUS ' FEMALE MALE : WHITE 19670 : FEMALE (21) WITH (22) WITH MALE PERSON(S) PERSON(S) UNDER 1 217 207 : BLACK 356 : SINGLE 1814 2063 60 OR OVER 65 OR OVER: • 1-2 421 421 : AM INDIAN. ETC : NOW MARRIED 4589 4590 : 1 PERSON 135 98 3-4 443 417 : INDIAN 79 : SEPARATED 110 . 70 : 2 OR MORE PERSONS: 5 176 236 : ESKIMO O : WIDOWED 228 41 : FAMILY HDUSEHOLD 382 242 ; 6 198 199 : ALEUT 0 : DIVORCED 582 358 : NDNFAMILY HOUSEHOLD 3 0 ' 7-9 612 638 : TOTAL 79 ;------ __-------------------------------- ___________________________________. 10-13 819 860 : ASIAN, PAC ISLANDER 16 HOUSEHOLDS BY PERSONS.TYPE 17 PERSONS UNDER 18 BY HOUSEHOLD 14 189 202 : JAPANESE 33 1 PERSON: TYPE AND RELATIONSHIP 15 1B0 200 CHINESE 34 FEMALE HOUSEHOLDER 563 IN HOUSEHOLD: 18 207 173 : FILIPINO 10 MALE HOUSEHOLDER 619 HOUSEHOLDER OR SPOUSE 7 17 194 196 : KOREAN 63 2 OR MORE PERSONS: CHILD OF HOUSEHOLDER: IB 154 152 : INDIAN 47 MARR. COUPLE FAMILY 4516 IN MARR. COUPLE FAMILY 6210 19 175 168 : VIETNAMESE 46 OTHER FAMILY: IN OTHER FAMILY 961 20 183 184 : HAWAIIAN O FEMALE HOUSEHOLDER 599 OTHER RELATIVE 153 : 21 199 161 : GUAMANIAN 0 MALE HOUSEHOLDER 116 NONRELATIVE 68 . 22-24 592 547 : SAMOAN 0 NONFAMILY HOUSEHOLD: IN GROUP QUARTERS: . 25-29 1272 1103 : TOTAL 233': FEMALE HOUSEHOLDER 153 INMATE 0 : . 30-34 1355 1232 : OTHER 162 MALE HOUSEHOLDER 258 OTHER. g ; . 35-44 1536 1612: ---------------------------------------------------------- _____________------ _------------------------ . 45-54 660 816 : 9 PERSONS OF SPANISH B PERSONS OF SPANISH : . 19 HOUSEHOLDS WITH 18 RELATED CHILDREN 55-59 217 251 : ORIGIN BY RACE ORIGIN BY ETHNICITY : PERSON(S) UNDER 16 BY AGE 60-61 70 58 : BY TYPE : UNDER 5 YRS 2111 : 62-64 79 77 : WHITE 93 : MEXICAN '• 94 MARR. COUPLE FAN 3145 5 TO 17 YRS - 65-74 181 137 BLACK -__5213 5 : PUERTO RICAN 13 OTHER FAMILY: •-------------______: : 75-84 51 49 AM INDIAN. ASIAN OR CUBAN 3 FEMALE HSHLOER 516 24 HOUSEHOLDS WITH • 85+ - 18 PAC ISLANDER i : OTHER SPANISH 36 MALE HSHLDER 72 NONRELATIVES TOTAL :_______________________ 1039 8 _6 10302 ________________________________________________________________________________:___________________-___; OTHER 47 : TOTAL SPANISH 146 NONFAMILY 23 PRESENT 541 ; 12 POPULATION BY AGE AND RACE : POPULATION BY HOUSEHOLD 27 HOUSING UNITS BY 28 SPANISH • : TYPE AND RELATIONSHIP RACE AND TENURE HOUSEHOLDER UNITS UNDER 5 5-17 18-64 65+ : (20).: OWNER RENTER BY RACE AND TENURE : WHITE 1996 5032 12402 440 : (15) PERSONS OCCUPIED OCCUPIED BLACK 46 103 207 O : TOTAL 65+ WHITE 4319 2274 OWNER RENTER : INDIAN 16 1B 45 0 : IN FAMILY HOUSEHOLD: BLACK 29 89 OCCUPIED OCCUPIED: : ASIAN 37 73 121 2 : HOUSEHOLDER 5231 177 INDIAN 8 13 : WHITE 7 9 : : OTHER. 31 53 78 0 : SPOUSE 4516 106 ASIAN 31 27 : BLACK -1 -1 : TOTAL 2126 5279 12853 442 : OTHER RELATIVE 8599 60 OTHER 12 22 : OTHER 13 24 -------------------------------------------. NONRELATIVE 173 0 ;------------ __------------------ _-------- _______: 13 POPULATION OF SPANISH : IN NONFAMILY HOUSEHOLD: 23 HOUSING UNITS WITH PERSON(S) 65+ BY AGE ORIGIN BY AGE AND RACE FEMALE HSHLD 716 80 OF HOUSEHOLDER AND TENURE AGE OF UNDER 5 5-17 18-64 65+ : MALE HSHLD 877 18 HOUSEHOLDER : WHITE 16 41 36 O : NONRELATIVE 511 O UNDER 65 65+ : BLACK -1 -1 -1 -1 : IN GROUP QUARTERS: TOTAL 65 275 : OTHER -1 -1 -1 -1 : INMATE 54 1 OWNER OCCUPIED 59 187 : TOTAL :-------------------------- 23 55 _---------------------- 68 0 OTHER 23 O _---------- _____________________________________________________________________. RENTER OCCUPIED 6 88 1960 CENSUS DATA (SUMMARY TAPE FILE 1) PAGE 2 OF 2 HOUSING ITEMS MINNESOTA ANALYSIS AND PLANNING SYSTEMS :------------------"'---------------------------'"-------------------- SUMMARY CODE AND TYPE: 27(PLACE) 1063 AREA NAME: EAGAN CITY COUNT OF HOUSING UNITS 5 YEAR-ROUND HOUSING _________PEEP-___-___ 41 NONCONDOMiNIUN HOUSING . _______________________PERS______________; 26 OCCUPIED HOUSING 36 PERSONS IN • TOTAL 7206': UNITS BY VACANCY STATUS UNITS BY OCCUPANCY UNITS BY TENURE OCCUPIED HOUSING URBAN 7206 : TOTAL 7205 STATUS UNITS 8Y TENURE URBAN FRINGE RURAL O :"OCCUPIED 6824 OWNER OCCUPIED 3961 - OWNER OCC 4399 : OWNER OCC 15028 ____________________________________________________________________PEEP O : VACANT 381 VACANT FOR SALE 115 RENTER OCC 2425 : RENTER OCC 5595 36 VALUE OF OWNER -OCCUPIED NONCONDOMINIUM 43 CONTRACT RENT OF 40 AVERAGE VALUE OF 29 YEAR-ROUND 30 YEAR-ROUND UNITS HOUSING UNITS RENTER -OCCUPIED NONCONDOMINIUM HOUSING : CONDOMINIUM UNITS BY ROOMS UNITS UNITS BY OCCUPANCY BY TENURE AND 1 38 • LESS THAN 510000 2 LESS THAN i50 3 $50:TO-S99 61 STATUS - VACANCY STATUS 2 184 : : $10000 TO $14999 4 $IGD TO $119 12OWNER OCC 3 671 : 140 $15000 TO $19999 1 $120 TO $139 15 : 4 931 : $20000 TO $24999 6 $140 TO $149 4 : : OWNER OCCUPIED f 77377 : RENTER OCC VACANT/SALE 44 : 5 1353 : 1 : %25000 TO $29999 : $30000 TO 7 $150 TO $159 15 VACANT FOR SALE f 89760 : OTHER VACANT : 6+ 4025 : 6 : MEDIAN 5.60 $34999 15 : S160 TO $169 11 ---------------------------;__________________..___;______________________: : : $35000 TO $39999 : $40000 TO 549999 32 : 154 $170 TO $199 37 42 AVERAGE VALUE OF 25 VACANT YEAR-ROUND 48 OCCUPIED UNITS : %50000 TO $79999 : 2523 : $200 TO $249 373 $250 TO $299 745 CONDOMINIUM HOUSING HOUSING UNITS BY WITH 1.01 OR MORE : $80000 TO $99999 640 : $300 TO $399 850 UNITS BY OCCUPANCY STATUS VACANCY STATUS PERSONS PER ROOM : $100000 TO $149999 498 : $400 TO $499 157 LACKING COMPLETE : $150000 TO $199999 W 61 : $500 OR MORE 9 FOR SALE FOR RENT 117 PLUMBING : $200000 OR MORE 18 : NO CASH RENT 41 OWNER OCCUPIED f 61714 : OCCASIONAL USE 173 : 28 OWNER : MEDIAN ________________________________________________________________ f 70900 MEDIAN $291 VACANT FOR SALE $ 62500 OTHER VACANT : OCC 1 63 RENTER OCC 2 ; 33 OCCUPIED HOUSING BY NUMBER OF PERSONS UNITS 37 OCCUPIED HOUSING 47 YEAR-ROUND UNITS BY : PERSONS IN OCCUPIED HOUSING AND TENURE UNITS BY NUMBER OCCUPANCY STATUS AND : UNITS WITH 1.01 OR MORE OWNER RENTER OF PERSONS PER ROOM AND TENURE PLUMBING FACILITIES : PERSONS PER ROOM . OCCUPIED 1 PERSON 396 OCCUPIED 786 WITH WITHOUT : (49) BY TENURE: : 2 PERSONS 959 : 775 : OWNER RENTER COMPLETE COMPLETE : OCCUPIED OCCUPIED OWNER OCC 483 : 3 PERSONS 856 439 : : PFLUMBING - PLUMBING : RENTER OCC 327 : 4 PERSONS 1235 :5 PERSONS 651 267 : 107 1.00 OR LESS 4324 2357 : OWNER OCCUPIED 4390 9 (S1) BY PLUMBING FACILITIES: 6 OR MORE : 1.01 TO 1.50 64 1.51 OR MORE_ 44 : RENTER OCCUPIED 2396 29 : COMPLETE 800 -_--__-_-__ ___--302-____._51 ____ -PEEP -11_ -__--_ _.____ 24 UNOCCUPIED 380 1 INCOMPLETE 10 46 RENTAL UNITS BY 55 YEAR-ROUND UNITS _BY NUMBER 50 PERSONS IN : 52 COUNT OF, _ 53 RENTAL 54 RENTAL OCCUPANCY STATUS OF UNITS AT ADDRESS HOUSING UNIT$ VACANT. UNITS UNITS • 1 2 TO 9 5537 LACKING BOARDED -UP VACANT VACANT RENTER OCCUPIED 2292 : 10 OR MORE 165 COMPLETE 1493 PLUMBING HOUSING FOR 2 MOS FOR 6 MOS VACANT FOR RENT 173 MOBILE HOME 10 72 UNITS OR MORE OR MORE : 2 34 25 SUPPRESSION INDICATORS : • 1N THIS LISTING OF SUMMARY TAPE FILE 1. IF AN ITEM APPEARS AS A NEGATIVE ONE (-1). THEN SUPPRESSION HAS OCCURRED. SUPPRESSION CAN TAKE EITHER OF TWO FORMS : 1) PRIMARY - THERE ARE FEWER THAN 15 PERSONS OR 5 HOUSING UNITS IN THE AREA BEING SUMMARIZED. 2) COMPLEMENTARY - SUPPRESSION HAS OCCURRED BECAUSE AN ITEM SUBJECT TO PRIMARY SUPPRESSION CAN BE OBTAINED BY SUBTRACTION. F r_ h! V' ti I%hi6i A • ti i Exclusive Agents R Woodbury, Minnesota • W d� If you search for location and value, you must see 00 Jb_C�6NDOMINIUMS' Where the planners began to dcsiFn Alderwood Condominiums the first rule was "Preserve the beauty of the site." Tucked into a natural hardwood forest, Alderwood immediately stands apart from the development atmosphere of most condominium projects. Every condo has its own fenced patio or patio balcony, every condo with a view — there are no back doors at Alderwood. There's privacy to be preserved, spacious- ness toenjoy. And there's location. Alderwood is adjacent to Wood- bury's Potawatomi Park, near Odawa Park, Battle Creek and Shawnee Parks. Far enough away and near enough to use are Free- ways 94 and 494. Shopping centers, churches and schools are minutes away and ou drive to the sprawling 3M office complex in less time than it lakes to enjoy.a second cup of coffee in the morning. Downtown St. Paul is 10 minutes West. The St. Croix River is on the horizon to the East. Great location for the Alderwood owner. Your Alderwood Condominium . how do you judge value? Look at these advantages: You're free from outdoor maintenance respon- sibilities. The exteriorof yourbuild- ing is all brick Williamsburg Colo- nial with maintenance -free trim. Wall construction between units is double for excellent sound control. Location ... Key to the good life at Alderwood Condominiums Energy saving codes are met or ex- ceeded throughout. And the amenities, the thought- ful differences that make day-to- day living a joy, overflow at Alder - wood. Utilities are individual. Even the optional central air condi- tioning is Just for your con- dominium. as throughout, closets beyondexpectation, extra storage in your own garage plus additional outside parking. Ceramic surrounds and cultured marble in the bath. Pre -wired TV antenna and pre -wired telephone jacks. Electric dishwasher and dis- posal. Even a dead -bolt lock on your outside door. Read the featureson the inside of this folder. But more important, visit Alderwood Condominiums. See the value, the "Great Room" Maisonettes that bring a new kind of home design to middle America. Imagineourself in the natural AI- derwoolsetting. You might not want to live anyplace else. CONDOMINIUMS_ Oriole Properties 10 minutes to downtown. Open daily. 6300 Alderwood Drive, Woodbury, Minn. 55125 Phone 738-: 777 M • 12 AND INTERSTATE 94 INSTITUTIONS I. Municipal Bldg. and Library BATTLE CRFFK (( 2. Woodbury Sr -H. S. u/IATTU 3 Woodbury Jr. H S. RR CRFFK I9r 4, Woodbury Elementary ' LAKE w 5. Royal Oak Elementary 24 OQA 10! > o RECREATION F9 .i � •V Z o v i � 6. Opbway Park T- Tamarac Nature Preserve 8. Chippewa Park CONDOMINIUMS O O 29 o o tiQ e w �� 9 Menomim Park v/L{�rVj/ m 10 Shawnee Park h VALLEY (,9E�r90 �J 13 11. Evergreen 4 m d Pas ge WindwPolawa 40 01 ,��.� 0 13. o Park 3 �� 0 14-Odawa Park N 16 19r\ 1 \ `l --21 j s COMMUNITY 15. Convenience Center ��y) _ s 122 16 Proposed Wooddale Shopping _N a STEEPLEVIEW VALLEY CREEK RD Center 17, 310 �, �a r23) (` 1 18. Western Ute Ins. Co. 19. Business Area Q1 ti v rZ„ Qy �> ® CHURCHES w 20. Woodbury Baptist 0 21. Woodbury Lutheran ,.CARVER LAKE w r� V U W 3 25 22. Christ Episcopal Church 23. Woodbury United Methodist g 12 24. Lutheran Church or Peace o CARVER 25. Salem Lutheran Church l 3 LAKE RD. Location ... Key to the good life at Alderwood Condominiums Energy saving codes are met or ex- ceeded throughout. And the amenities, the thought- ful differences that make day-to- day living a joy, overflow at Alder - wood. Utilities are individual. Even the optional central air condi- tioning is Just for your con- dominium. as throughout, closets beyondexpectation, extra storage in your own garage plus additional outside parking. Ceramic surrounds and cultured marble in the bath. Pre -wired TV antenna and pre -wired telephone jacks. Electric dishwasher and dis- posal. Even a dead -bolt lock on your outside door. Read the featureson the inside of this folder. But more important, visit Alderwood Condominiums. See the value, the "Great Room" Maisonettes that bring a new kind of home design to middle America. Imagineourself in the natural AI- derwoolsetting. You might not want to live anyplace else. CONDOMINIUMS_ Oriole Properties 10 minutes to downtown. Open daily. 6300 Alderwood Drive, Woodbury, Minn. 55125 Phone 738-: 777 M • ®a .�r. jcy, . J::•Ti, r Fl�li utlA il4Ciy i-.,.,. �.� ,lit � ••• !l 1 ..� t -.� Il+iaf+l 11�� I 1 Y1 CD ,yt Y)) Srr 1 i I'll ,sll fil`�JI {rT�{r1l 1rY Y'tr rl ,la !% •� l r1, \j'}♦11�:4` r iL \alj rl: I llfJl It �d� J4l ill! i J1�` LTr rl f 'd r - �.� r71 ylr k 1 11T 1 �r".J_ 1 f, 1A1 6Jt1a :` , fl� I 4yyj� ,;94- 4J . tFl , �9aa{i4/JY Li. ® .'!�. J �Sy i1i n a, tl St l,l/ / 1 /It I } /T /�( ' /, it • 1 ♦lt 16JY yEt a yv,r %. J- r J {Ll - 6 Pt, Ftl1 tti r'Iti ' `/ �{1Ir '' It Y/,t u/ / •/ IL•• y \rail },hl I ap,1't L Ir -i S• ! tai! re 1'l \\ht{1 I ,Y! I,l -L r {1 GI 1 1 -jt 5/G aal rie j,}!a r rt - ��® 1•. ^11j sI tJ h{'JYJ4- ;l/fl/P r .. (f '1 ll af•rl, 4r(La y rr G +' o I +L It/ -L a.a rf�Sa ,}.. rr, 1a6 i'f�Jt 1 .It/ 1•t j rrl lt6ct IILG{}�. 1, 111 lr'J /`�u 6l r!}1. Jt L I Aj`Ir y Ir l'}1% 1r , 1�}kL t/� .': i'{, jLfll it 1'`/11 f. •l rYJ fir{i J �) h1 ilt Pft f. 11 i.I—•^ , .tI • r'4re 11 YIYIh, �L Y is 1 t .f al 4 �^ , < • J.%:l_. r 11 �tJ1��1 r!�i!%'J `: to �S•f tTM.ti"frJ�(/J,i,,1 rt 1 •/ C i 11 . ,�— 1,}, -Jr Af tt.l fl IJ '� ••,r,l \ .... ,+!`'�y'r ;.0..Lr-_r4V3VV ONIA�� rfY` II I;Vs;r. 1•P'1 k t / y'l)411 t' r T�LrS/ n IV, 1 r. r �II iJ Q�a f,r Yr l.,Y •y, 1, %il l6{y+.3 r. ! fl r�a n31a rJ �l,i)1 Fjfp�l (t,!1(ll rF :' r al• it r(,r, S� e - / tf: tr,i �, YI • ty t s i N 1 ? , !}-1, La J 5)11Y.1 ip J�t.':t \ i•=1� 'Y JYd la / Tila 1� t I\r5 r {IIT i "1 5I il, sF 1 t iik�'}t+ra Y/I ;'=r Vj afI I' % rC ai rl/r �/ -Jr J,l i 7 I Ila i :!H/ Ilr�t vi j•A Y 4 a4' �j 1 i Z r. l,l frJJY`•l � I .Iil 1/��'FYeYJ r lr�f I/6Jrrr. i Sr r•F ~ .V Ilif 1 f J JI h, f r, I • t' . ••, •t1 41 I ,• ai •/ I r. rl ®� Z a Y 1 J } ( I. ♦1. • r' ♦ it _ !� } r f, t\lt r lA,Ilfr, a,i J' FI✓r fI i.-! • �l00 ON09�N 1 ♦ • A I, S ra ,f A"N0 + - a .fij L S 4,•l rtj ji •1 t 1 T+tTJa r i 1! l! ! -a(, � -, - i T • _Jf) • 1 f e J,IV Y 1 I ,SF. t la t ! r f r`' - •_ , • ! 4 -. 1 I ifi�' l � j • L 1 %Y .� t 1lr, 11' 4 ( -al ', ( '.1 . Stl � r ', 1 1, `{ ` rY li- i � 1,}lra4 �( s f) /,:��iM,ly •�f 'r' f./F� JJ ,Ii!'a4'r rt; 1 1', , all- {'. ( - ! 'v ✓..i lJ Jh1, 1! 1R al • hJ -I •} �.t5 a, 1 , I 1' 11 a' Ial) I ' ' LI /t r 1 Tt t I • /r .. , 1 w -ea r r ,tu , , ,lrfi IL"a = ti f tl1 it a •LI L 1 ft pita 1 F {L ;fl le, La, _\ f -r, , 'a,J, `( f ! iFr rl fh I'j,4 1--1. rt`Lr/ rn lrJ ! \111 ,•ak 7 - ., I ,J r It ,rJ t r r l '.L '1♦ al 1' I - •.y1J . 1 f .f11 ! H1, i •F 1 f t•= . p [ I L / It a.. ;'1•!111 , p`'l. j1f -rlr l I rl )!u f-'rl sr1 rY41j IrllL h,lr i-I�.'!'ri Gl 1' rld�;- rrj ->j 1. t7J rS .. yE1 rt'�y i 1 /•.11 r. /. Stt }.-.��'. ..1. Li 1 /tfk-1/� Yr <. Jy 1/1 . tf '� L. of l.5 +l'�rt`ra;. 4l 1' f � + ar • =r i, ` 1 4 1. F i r, i - a r' r a u f ;if<�J, ,r Ii IY 1 r- �,� L t r / f �' N 1r • !•I ,�J p /4 jSr!!t Sjll, i1 -�J r fa /1. r,� al/r f♦ 1{ P� 4tr1 rf e a I ki i J11t- r •J�( ', ,.a `T"ir -, l ( l '. ' , :' r�Jf 1 l ` l L• II '_ I, la1 I/:1 I rr;= f�i/}}J'/Y!'rttfa I JJ Li iar 111 e. i,l llr-}'a \II ! J t o E Z x t l � t la ,• 41 ,�' a , r- � f , , I -:r , f , rl o 6 l�1qq, I �.,t 1 rt L -. a I/.. e , ,r1.'Y �q , tut tyV' 1 -tta .r .J. r:r •,: G •ist >_t llt' M1t LIt1%7f(/ll.�ffiif ij lU11t1Y fIF,tf' m /1tlr.1.t6, fTf rtf if\lSl ala, lr lr++/f,.fr11 �a O�t `a �1rlrYi r4r rJ ..1� Il `lYl 1'� J. f.V e j Ail. ry,1'.t ,j a,l 11(wJ t/}!:t le (r.� , Ifi4 a 1 1.\1a , 7 V��T Td !'• lr ,q 1��FJ ll•�,r �F47<�!aq d. S' `f eYe 'L • G1, Tial/i ": �tv 1 r. •.,'• � •, yi° t tl •.�J 1 ll ,•r Jr, r(aY,t 4 frtl i�f,i 4� lAl!/� e4 1-�E ,f1%.r;• 14, OEMINIF It i /s4 ;11i f�i��r arr fv, r/1 .i N�11l�1r lti5 .%r .• I t.-, . ,•1 i LL YV .1 j,l♦ f. t•. • '' 1 � t. •,�.�. - .. , / i i I 1i, /.�, r s�.l1 J 1 !'f . t 1 I ui. 1 , j}tj a, a i APC Minutes February 25, 1982 LEXINGTON PLACE - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of U. S. Homes Corporation and Orrin Thompson for preliminary plat approval for Lexington Place consis- ting of 84.62 acres and containing 28 condominium buildings for a total of 672 dwelling units was presented to the Planning Commission. The property is currently zoned R-4 located west of Lexington at the extension of Duckwood Drive. The density could range between 12 and 22 dwelling units per acre and the land use indicates north of Duckwood is R-3 (Mixed Residential) at a density of 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre. South of Duckwood is R-2 with a density of 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre. The gross density would be 7.9 dwelling units per acre and net density would be 9.17 per acre. He has proposed to plat each of the 28 condominium buildings into a separate lot that would conform with the ordinance requirements. Each building would be 3 stories and contain 24 units each but with a mix of 6 studio units, 7 one - bedroom units and 11 two-bedroom units for a total of 24 units per building on a general basis. There would be 12 car garages at either end of each building and a request was made to reduce the parking from 2.5 to 2.0 spaces per unit. An earlier application had been submitted in 1981 for development on the same property and Orrin Thompson Homes had not pursued the proposal at that time. Bob Hoffman, Orrin Thompson, Bob Carlson and Chuck Winden appeared for the applicant. Studios would be priced under $40,000.00 and larger units at a higher price range. All would be for -sale units and would be approved for FHA financing. Tot lots would be included and two outdoor swimming pools. No tennis courts would be included in the proposal. An explanation of the ex- terior decor, landscaping, berming, etc. took place by representatives of the applicant and it was suggested by a number of neighbors present that Lexington should be upgraded in order to alleviate the heavy traffic problems even at the present time. Other neighboring property owners objected to being assessed for storm sewer improvements and Mr. Colbert stated the area bene- fited would most likely be assessed for storm sewer improvements. Mr. Carlson stated that child density would be about 0.18 children per unit. School children bus traffic was a concern of neighboring owners and compliance with the character of the other single-family residences in the area. It was suggested that a review of the storm sewer issue take place by the staff before council review. Mr. Thompson indicated that they expected to commence construction north of Deerwood Drive initially, and that all construction would be completed in 3 to 4 years. The grading plans are not complete but the berms and plantings are planned extensively on the project. There were concerns about resale to speculators and it was noted that there could be no control over such resale after the initial purchase by an owner -occupant. It was also noted that the number of units may change as sales occur, depending on the demand for specific types of units. The hearing commenced at 8:10 p.m. and at 9:25 p.m., Krob moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Cross easements and parking easements shall be granted on the lots which are served by common access for more than one dwelling unit and shall be reviewed by the City staff prior to recording. 4 39 0 0 APC Minutes February 25, 1982 2. The outside parking spaces shall be of 10 x 20 dimension and the parking areas shall be surfaced with concrete curbing around the perimeter of the parking areas. 3. Homeowner Association Articles and By -Laws for the development shall be submitted and reviewed prior to the final plat of the first stage. 4. Detailed landscaping plans shall be submitted and approved by the City and a landscape bond shall be required for an adequate amount and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 5. The preliminary plat shall be reviewed by the Eagan Park Committee and be subject to the Park Committee's recommendations. 6. The 2.5 parking spaces per ordinance requirement shall be reduced to one covered space and one parking space per unit. 7. The preliminary plat shall be reviewed by Dakota County's Plat Commission and subject to their recommendations. 8. All other ordinance requirements shall be met. 9. Temporary service for sanitary sewer will be allowed through the Tomark Addition for this proposed development under the condition that the internal sanitary sewer system shall provide flexibility in allowing approxi- mately 60% of this development to be redirected in the future through the Windcrest trunk system to the south. 10. A storm sewer system connecting the proposed northerly pond (DP -18) with the pond in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue (DP -5) must be constructed as a condition of final plat approval. 11. A positive gravity storm sewer outlet to service the property south of Duckwood Drive must be constructed to Hurley Lake in addition to developing the internal ponding area referenced as JP -45. 12. The construction of a 44 foot, 9 ton collector street for the extension of Duckwood Drive to the east plat line shall be the responsibility of this development. 13. A 60 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Lexington Avenue. An 80 foot right-of-way shall be dedicated for Duckwood Drive. 14. All related trunk area assessments and lateral benefits from exist- ing trunk utilities shall be paid or levied at the time of final plat approval, if not listed as a pending assessment under an approved project by the City of Eagan. 40 0 0 APC Minutes February 7.5, 1982 15. Drainage/ponding easements approved by the City shall be dedicated of sufficient size to incorporate the required storage capacities as follows: (DP -18 - 11.2 acre feet for a controlled elevation of 876.0) (JP -45 - 7.8 acre feet with a controlled elevation of 890.3) 16. This development shall provide for a future storm sewer outlet from Pond JP -46 within the Carriage Hills Golf Course. 17. Ten foot drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated adjacent to all public rights-of-way and adjacent to private property. 18. A 5 foot concrete sidewalk should be installed along the north side of Duckwood Drive as a part of this development. An 8 foot bituminous trail - way should be constructed along the east side of Lexington Avenue within a 10 foot easement adjacent to the west line of this proposed plat. In addition, a walkway connection to the southeast corner of this plat should be provided as indicated by the Advisory Park and Recreation Committee. Those in favor were Hall, Rrob, Mulrooney and Turnham. Wilkins and McCrea voted no. Member Wilkins stated that she felt that the City should not be a testing ground for up to 168 efficiency units in the 28 buildings. There were strong concerns regarding the inclusion of the studio units in the com- plex. COMSE;RV NO. 1 - PRELIMINARY PLAT The hearing regarding the application of Comsery Corporation for prelimi- nary plat approval of Comsery No. 1 consisting of 63 acres with one lot of approximately 41.09 acres for corporate headquarters and one outlot of 21 acres for future use was convened by Chairman Charles Hall. The property is zoned I-1 and allows an office building as a permitted use within the dis- trict. Also, the land use provides for industrial and therefore zoning and comprehensive land use guide both allow for the proposed use. The Comsery Corporation's international corporate headquarters is proposed for Lot 1, Block 1, and the first phase office building would include 179,529 square feet. The building would be between 3 and 4 stories, depending on the ground elevation around the building, with two future expansions, one possibly in 1984 and one in 1985. The projected employment is 359 employees with 1983 employment of 490. Potential future employment is 1,000 to 1,100 employees. Parking required would be 1,017 spaces and the proposal is for 862 spaces. The applicant indicates that 962 is more than adequate for current purposes. The applicant also requested 9 x 20 foot parking spaces, rather than the 10 x 20 foot requirement of the City. Mr. Bob Worthington of Rauenhorst, Jerry Fain of Comsery and Mike Ryan of Rauenhorst were present for the applicant. There was discussion concerning phasing the project and Mr. Fain indicated that Comsery does design programming for manufacturing companies on an inter- national basis. The employee hours of employment are staggered and further, the applicant intends to retain as many actual amenities as possible and will Install jogging paths, indoor physical facilities, etc. The roof top will be 6 Y. 0 s Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Fourteen PROPOSED CONDITIONS/SOPERAMERICA PLAT B. Discussion Regarding Proposed Conditions for SuperAmerica Final Plat -- The SuperAmerica Corporation made application to the City of Eagan in 1978 for a preliminary plat approval and conditional use to allow a service station to have a convenience center attached to a service station in a General Business District. In 1978, the APC recommended denial of the preliminary plat and conditional use permit. The City Council recommended approval of the prelimi- nary plat and conditional use permit, however, there were no condi- tions attached to the preliminary plat approval. On September 1, 1981, a Mr. E. Lewis Schuette appeared from Columbus, Indiana, representing SuperAmerica. The City Council, at that time, approved renewal of the conditional use permit and preliminary plat which had expired for SuperAmerica. Due to the fact there was not a new public hearing scheduled to reconsider the conditional use permit, there were no conditions placed on the renewal of the pre- liminary plat and conditional use permit. The applicants are now in the process of finalizing the preliminary plat and in the prepa- ration of the development agreement. Normally, the City would require in conditions for preliminary plat or conditional use permit that there be concrete curbing around the perimeter of the parking area, that a detail landscape plan be submitted, that an adequate landscaping bond be provided for the landscape bond and that the bond is not released until at least one year after the landscaping is completed and all easements are required by the City Engineer. One additional concern the City staff has had during the entire process of considering the SuperAmerica plat is in regard to the right in turn and the right out turn onto Yankee Doodle Road. Apparently, this was approved with the preliminary plat and City staff would like for the City Council to possibly change or amend this action as a part of a final plat approval. For background information, a copy of the original report prepared by the consul- ting planner, John Voss, and action of the City Council is enclosed on pages 4 3 through 4 7 for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny consi- deration to add certain conditions to the final plat for incorpora- tion into a development agreement as suggested by the City staff. GiL-1 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN __ ... S'UEJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Plat PETITIONER: Super America LOCATION: S'd Quadrant of Pilot Knob Rd b IIDATE OF HEARING: May 23, 1978 v�...» r,,.,aie an - �EXISTIi:G ZONING: General Business (B-3) II DATE OF PLANNING REPORT: May 18, 1978 I PREPARED BY: John S. Voss -ET ITION The petitions are for - a conditional use permit in order to operate a service station at the southwest corner of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Coodle Road, and prell•-in.ary pl-` in :or to plat this parcel into a sing J loto =?tail as The coning o -:•-ante (52.07, Suodivislc. ICC) per- .`s motor fuel :ales by conditional use permiT in :e-.aral Business - B-3 - districts, however, retail sales of convenlenu goo:s such as �ceries, are not permitted. The petitioner intends to ask the City Coun-iI to ex;!-!:! the uses permitted In B-3 districts to Include retail sales of can - veniance Items ..hen the conditional use petition Is acted upon by the Council. (See attached remora -dam.) 2. Drivewav Access to Pilot Knob Road and Yarkee !)ccdle Road The proposed site plan shows driveway accesses b both Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot K P.oa�. It has tae, assumed by the City that this lot would onlu be served by access f 81st Street as platted in the Bicentennial Addition to'the west. Jurisdiction over granting these accesses would Ile with Cakota County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, related to future 1-35E construction. A preliminary indication is that the Minnesota ^apartment of Transportation would not permit (by purchase of access) direct access to Pilot Knob Road, however, Dakota Cour nay approve a rignr turn, In and out access along Yankee Coodle Road. In any Instant the petitioner snould revise the site plan In order to orient driveways to 81st Stree EW 4. 5. ner31 Business (B-3) Zonin Inconsistent I This property was zoned commerclal several years ago and designated B-3 when tfie Zaning Ordinance No. 52 was adopted. Since then, the Yankee Square Shopping Center has develoi under Neighborhood Business (NB) and Roadside Business (RB) requirements. This single lot, zoned B-3, is now inconsistent with zoning In the area and that Is why service bays would not be required as they were on the site to the west. . Consideration should be given to rezoning this lot to Roadside Business (RB) cons)stens with the adjacent property to the west. Also, allowing no access from this rope except to 81st Street, would appear to make traffic functions at the Pilot Knob Roadd/ Yankee Doodla Road intersection much safer and efficient. I Site Design I The site plan is generally well-designed except for the accesses. Also, a detalled landscape pia: needs to b b e su mitted. I Preliminary Plat The relic.. ,- � p plat is a simple one lot pla- =.a' accesses are a -oncern and ded'- c2ticn of ri; --of along County =-,,i- sho.... require. by Danofa Ccunty. I:1D IL �.,.�._ . Page 5 5-23-78 SUPERAHERICA PRELIMINARY PIAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERIT. The public hearing relating to the application of Superamerica for preliminary plat approval and conditional use permit for service station and convenience center at the southwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road was next convened by the Chairman. Mr. John Hoganson and Mr. Richard Townsend appeared for the applicants. There would be thirty-four parking spaces on the parcel and Mr. Hoganson stated that the Dakota County Highway Department did not have an objection to a right turn in and a right turn out lane from Yankee Doodle Road to the parcel. It was noted that the City of Eagan has for several years recommendedgranting access to Washington Drive only for safety reasons. Planning Commission members were concerned about the private access to the shopping center through the Superamerica station if access to Yankee Doodle were granted, similar to the problems of the Texaco station or. Cedar and Highway #13. Further there appeared to be insufficient setback for the access from Pilot Knob Road, as the access was extremely close to 35E. Mr. Townsend indicated that the access to Yankee Doodle Road is critical to the proposal and further he stated that there will be no outside storage on the premises. Sperling moved and Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of both application for reasons including those stated above, that the proposed access to Yankee Doodle Road was not conducive to safety, because the City has been planning for access only through Washington Drive, that the City has had a similar experience with the Texaco station creating congestion and that the access is too close to the intersection of Pilot Knob Road. All members voted in favor except Dembroski ,,1,^el.c.��.. n.i Tv . SUPERAMERICA STATION. Mr. John Hoganson and another representative of SuperAmerica appeared on behalf of its application for preliminary plat approval and conditional use permit for a service station and convenience center at the Southwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road. The A.P.C. recommended denial.- It was noted that the Dakota County Staff has indicated access to Yankee Doodle would be permitted for right turns only. The Council reviewed the application and the recommendation of the Planning Commission. It was noted that residents in the general area strongly favored the application, and that the site plan appeared to be well laid out and appears to meet the Ordinance requirements. Parranto moved and Murphy seconded the motion, all members voted yea to grant approval of the conditional use permit to include retail sales of convenience items. Parranto moved and Murphy seconded the motion to approve the preliminary plat for the SuperAmerica location. 421 members voted in favor. Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Fifteen 0 SOOTHFORK RESTAURANT C. Request for 24 Hour Operation to Serve Food for Southfork Res- taurant -- At the April 6, 1982 City Council meeting, Mr. Stan Lynn, owner of Southfork Restaurant, represented by his attorney, Mr. Richard Gabriel, made a request to operate the Southfork Res- taurant on a 24 hour basis. Currently, the liquor ordinance prohi- bits the operation of a restaurant beyond the hours of the sale of liquor, and, therefore, a variance or ordinance amendment would be required. The City Attorney did address the issue and stated that an ordinance amendment is required if the City Council wishes to consider this type of operation. The City Administrator was directed to review the matter with the Chief of Police and the City Attorney was asked to prepare additional information and sug- gestions for an ordinance amendment to be considered at the April 20, 1982 meeting. Enclosed on pages 49 through_ 3 is a copy of a letter from the City Attorney's oF'ficewwith proposed additional wording for an ordinance amendment as well as copies of the current ordinances that prohibit sale of food, requiring that all persons vacate the licensed premises within 30 minutes of the time that the sale of such intoxicating liquor has ceased. Also enclosed on page .5't=is a copy of a memorandum from Chief of Police Des- Lauriers, providing some comments on the request for 24 hour food service. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the request of Southfork Restaurant to be open 24 hours a day for the purpose of serving food both during and after the sale of liquor. 0 0 HAUGE, SauTEC, EIDE & IILLLEn, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS ]BOB SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN (ST. PAUL). MINNESOTA 66122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 April 15, 1982 Re: 24-hour Restaurants -- Sales of 3.2 Beer, Wine, or Liquor Dear Tom: AREA COOK 512 TELEPHONE 464.4224 We have been requested to devise an alternative ordinance allowing service of food past the hours for service of beer, wine or intoxicating liquor in an establishment serving both food and such liquor. Attached is a copy of Ordinance Section 42.13, Subdivision 2, and Ordinance Section 43.10, Subdivision 10, as they are presently enacted. In each case, the last sentence of the paragraph prevents an establishment serving intoxicating or non -intoxicating liquor from staying open past the hours allowed for the sale of such liquor. Obviously, the last sentence can be stricken in one or both cases allowing an establishment serving intoxicating liquor and/or 3.2/wine establishments to stay open without restriction for the serving of food. However, it was suggested to us that there should be some restriction as not all establishments are of a type for which it is desirable to allow longer hours on the pretext of serving food when liquor may very well be consumed. Therefore, we are submitting one possible restriction although there are many other possibilities which would provide some control over the types of establish- ments that will be allowed to remain open. Attached to the copy of these ordinance sections is additional wording which can be applied to both sections or to only the section applying to establishments selling 3.2 and/or wine. Other restrictions that could be used include: requiring the service of food a set number of hours per day; requiring that all liquors be locked away at a set time; requiring a separate bar room which can be closed at a set time; requiring that liquor glasses be removed from tables at a set time; and/or that the bar be covered when the sale of liquor is not allowed. Sincerely, David G. Keller skk enclosures 4 9 0 • PROPOSED ADDITIONAL WORDING However, if the establishment is a restaurant which provides seating for at least people, serves (intoxicating/non-intoxicating liquor or wine) only in conjunction with the service of food at tables, and does not have a bar for the sale of such liquor, it may remain open to serve food after the time the sale of such liquor has ceased. SO £'sC : iON 12. I3 J C&)k ; OF OPERATION Subd. 1. - No sale of into>.ic.as._ug liquors shall be siade after 1:00 a.m. 1 on Sunday, For between the hours of 1:00 a.m: and 3:00 p.m. on Memorial bay, nor between the routs of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on auy alection d::y, in the district in whiah such election shall be held. No on -sale shall be made between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. on any week day. No .,ff-sale shall be made before 8:00 a.m. or after 8:00 .p.m. of any day except Saturday on which off -sale may be made until 10:00 p.m. No off -sale shall be made on New Year's Day, ��. Januar t., Memorial Day, Mayl3fth; Independence Day, July 4th; Thanksgiving C.9y `)t or Christmas Day, December 25th; but on evenings preceeding ouch, if the sale of �`\ liqucr is not otherwise prohibited on such evenings, off -sale may be made until 10:00 p.m. except that. no off -sale shall be made on December 24th after 5:00 p,m. Sunday sale hours shall be between the hours of 12 o'clock noon to 12 o'rioc:k midnight. Subd. 2. -- No person shall consume beer or intoxicating liquor :n sr;; licensed establishment in this V111aga at any time more than 30 minutes after the time for selling such intoxicati--W liquor has ceased, except that employees may c*resume beer or intoxicating liquor fox one hour after the time for selling such intoxicating liquor has ceased. Proof of employment must be shown upon request of any official Village personnel. It shall be the personal responsibil'- ty of each licensee to see that the terms of this section are complied with. Further all nersons other than employees shall vacate the licensed premises within 30 minutes R tar the time the sale of such into-icating Uquor has nsat:ud. Subd. 3. -- Nothing herein shall be construed as prohibiting Che u•nou^tption of InLoxSca•,ing liquor on Sundeys between Lhe hours of 12:00 neea r.nd 12:10 midnight of the premises which operate a dicing room serving mealc regu- lcrl.y and which has a seating capacity for 30 or more people, when such consump- tion is not prohibited by state law. -14- S/ provided, however, that • such premises are duly liceneeifor operation as a tavern under the ordinances of the Village relating to taverns, such dancing, exhibitions or entertainment may be permitted. Subd. 7. -- INSPECTION OF PREMISES -- Any peace officer shall have the unqualified right to enter, inspect and 'search the premises of a licensee during business hours without a search and seizure warrant. Subd. 8. -- RESPONSIBI*T_TY -- Every licensee shall be responsible for the conduct of his place of business and shall maintain conditions of sobriety and order. Subd. 9.--VIOIATION BY AGENT -- Any act of any clerk, barkeeper, agent, servant, or employee, in violation hereof, shall be deemed the act of the employer and licenses of such place, as well as that of said clerk, barkeeper, agent, servant, or employee, and every such employer and licensee shall be liable to all the penaltiesprovided herein for the violation of same, equally with the said clerk, barkeeper, agent, servant, or employee. Subd. 10. -- HOURS OF OPERATION -- No sale of non-intoxicationg liquors shall be made after 1:00 a.m. on Sunday, nor between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. on Memorial Day., nor between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m, on any election day, in the district in which such election shall be held. No on - sale shall be made between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on any week day. No off -sale shall be made before 8:00 a.m. or after 8:00 p.m. of any day except Saturday on which off -sale may be made until 10:00 p.m. No off -sale shall be made on New Year's Day, January let; Memorial Day, May 30th; Independence Day, July 4th; Thanksgiving Day or Christmas Day, December 25tb; but on evenings preceeding such, if the sale of liquor is not otherwise prohibited on such even- titngs, off -sale may be made until 10:00 p.m, except that no off -sale shall be made un December 24th after 8:00 p.m. Sunday sale hours shall be between the hours of 12 o'clock noon to 12 o'clock midnight. No person shall consume beer or 1 -5- r non -intoxicating *or in any licensed establishment in this Village at any time more than 30 minutes after the time for selling such non -intoxicating r' I liquor has.ceased, except that employees may consume beer or non -intoxicating liquor for one hour after the time for selling such non -intoxicating liquor has ceased. Proof of employment must be shown upon request of any official / Village personnel. It shall be the personal responsibility of each licensee to see that the terms of this section are complied with. Further, all persons other than employees shall vac9te the licensed premises within 30 minutes after the time the sale of such non -intoxicating liquor has ceased, Subd. 11 -- STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS -- All windows in the front of any licensed place shall be of clear glass, and the view of the whole interior shall be unobstructed by screens, curtains or partitions. There shall be no partition, box, stall, screen, curtain or other device which obstructs the view of any part of the room from the general observation of persons in the room; but partitions, subdivisions, or panels not higher than forty-eight inches from the floor shall not be considered obstructions. Subd. 12. -- MIXING -- It shall be unf9vful for any licensee, his agents, or employees to mix, or sell for the purpose of mixing, any such malt liquor, or to suffer or permit upon the premises named in his license, any mixing or spiking of malt liquor, soft drinks, or any other liquor or beverage by adding to or with the same any alcohol or other intoxicating liquor. Subd. 13. -- INTOXICATED PERSONS -- It shall be unlawful for any licensee, his agents, or employees to sell or serve non -intoxicating liquor to any intoxicated person, or to permit an intoxicated person to remain upon the premises licensed. Subd. 14. -- SPIKING -- Ic all premie-, licensed for on -sale under this ordinance, a sign saying "No Spiking Allowed," or "No Spiking," of sufficient size and clarity to be easily read by all persons in said premises shall be -6- S3 Aer VLaon i3oher MepartnWt TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: Liquor License Establishments Remaining Open 24 -hours for Food Service 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan. Minnesota 55122 14 April 1982 I have talked to several people in the liquor licensing busi- ness, including people from the State and Minneapolis. Minneapolis does have several locations that have a liquor License and that do remain open all night for food service. Minneapolis has some restrictions in their ordinance; e.g.: The establishment must remain open for a specific number of hours such as 18 to 24 hours per day. This prevents the owner from opening the establishment at 2100 hours and remaining open during the night-time hours The liquor and bar must be secured away from the general public after the liquor closing hour. The definition of secured" is not defined specifically, however, it is recommended that "secure" means in a separate room or removed from the general public area and locked up in a storage area. At this time, it is my recommendation to the City Council that they do not permit extended hours for food service. I do not see a benefit to the city or to the general public to permit our liquor establishments to remain open 24 hours for food service. In fact, I think it could be a policing problem at this time. itilain DesLauriers C MD/vk 54 THE LONE OAK TREE — THE SY2t1BOL OF STRENGTH & GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY r.:` -: Martin DesLauriers- Chief of Police �== Jay M. Berthe Assistant Chief o/' Police TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: Liquor License Establishments Remaining Open 24 -hours for Food Service 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan. Minnesota 55122 14 April 1982 I have talked to several people in the liquor licensing busi- ness, including people from the State and Minneapolis. Minneapolis does have several locations that have a liquor License and that do remain open all night for food service. Minneapolis has some restrictions in their ordinance; e.g.: The establishment must remain open for a specific number of hours such as 18 to 24 hours per day. This prevents the owner from opening the establishment at 2100 hours and remaining open during the night-time hours The liquor and bar must be secured away from the general public after the liquor closing hour. The definition of secured" is not defined specifically, however, it is recommended that "secure" means in a separate room or removed from the general public area and locked up in a storage area. At this time, it is my recommendation to the City Council that they do not permit extended hours for food service. I do not see a benefit to the city or to the general public to permit our liquor establishments to remain open 24 hours for food service. In fact, I think it could be a policing problem at this time. itilain DesLauriers C MD/vk 54 THE LONE OAK TREE — THE SY2t1BOL OF STRENGTH & GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Sixteen NEW: iBUSiINESS SIGNCRAFTERS OUTDOOR DISPLAY A. Signcrafters Outdoor Display, Inc., Charles Peugh, for a Pylon Business Sign -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the March 23, 1982 meeting to consider an application submitted by Signcrafters Outdoor Display for a condi- tional use permit to allow a pylon sign at the Contract Beverages Building located at 2755 Hwy. 55. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the pylon sign subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. For additional information on this item, refer to the planning assistant's report, a copy of which is enclosed on pages 56 through S For a copy of the action that was taken by the TP'C-,—refer to page (moo . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC to approve the pylon sign request. s5 CITY OF EAGAN 0 SUBJECT: CCNDITICNAL USE PERMIT - PYLCN SIGN APPLICANT: SIGNCRAF= OUTDOOR DISPLAY, INC. - CHARLES PEUGH LOCATION: PART OF THE W' OF SECTION 2 - 2755 HIGHWAY 55 EXISTING ZONING: I-1 (LICET IMUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 16, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVID M. OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign at the Contract Beverages building located at 2755 Highway 55. The proposed sign would be, non -illuminated and made of plywood and it would in- dicate the location of the recycling area of the Contract Beverages building. A conditional use permit is needed for this sign because any business free- standing ground sign which projects more than 7 feet above ground level is con- sidered a pylon sign which requires a conditional use permit. The proposed sign would project 14 feet from ground level and the total area of the sign would be 84 square feet. The Sign Ordinance #16 states that pylon signs may not project more than 27 feet above ground level and may not exceed 125 square feet in area per side. There- fore, the proposed sign is meeting these requirements of Ordinance #16. The pro- posed sign also meets the requirement of being 300 feet from any other pylon sign. If approved, the pylon sign shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) The pylon sign may not be located within 300' of any other pylon sign measured on the sane side of the street. 2) The pylon sign may not project more than 27 feet above ground level. 3) The pylon sign may not exceed 125 square feet of signage per area. 4) The pylon sign shall not be located nearer than 10 feet from any proper- ty or dividing line. 5) The sign shall be in conformance with all other applicable ordinances. DMO/jack SG /f 11 ,CONTRACT mr.%a T k, LINU ttyy 'tip �r DcM 'WW PiTGN PRoP�� S/TE of • MclrEE En-ERPRIs4:6- Ii r �T_ 07 R-1 .gyp rl. i - E GENTIAN ROA ;\ R-I� /' I G B A' A RBRB�� (* I pa SUBG 0 3 7' PD Ll 4 -CK 0 KJ's 1= �--� PD PL T 9-5 I ; P D I r 74-0 C) Ll A RSC '- EX 1 I 0 SLL f' Ki Lw -4 A EAGANDA FE - �TEFi A L I LONEO AK ROAD L I A} 1 3B4 SLI A 'EA 19DAILE' Ll --r G B R- 7— - T-- - i NB --t.i . POSTAL � I I GB A] :RviCE -1 c�_ - - _�. R -I i _ti LI 0 • SIGNCRAPTBRS OUTDOOR DISPLAY _ CORTRACT BEVERAGES _ SIGN PERMIT The public hearing regarding the application of Signcrafters Outdoor Display and Contract Beverages for conditional use permit for pylon sign at 2755 Highway #55, was next convened by the Chairman. Mr. Charles Peugh appeared for Signcrafters as did a representative of Contract Beverages. There were several questions but no objections. Bohne moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following conditions: lThe pylon sin may not be locatd wit pylon signmeasured on the same side of thee str ethin 300 feet of any other. 2. The pylon sign may not project more than 27 feet above ground level. 3. The pylon sign may not exceed 125 square feet of signage per area. 4. The pylon sign shall not be located nearer than 10 feet from any property or dividing line. 5. The sign shall be in conformance with all other applicable ordi- nances. All voted yea. rco 0 • Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Seventeen VARIANCE REQUEST - DONALD RASMUSSEN B. Donald Rasmussen for a Variance for a Garage Setback at 1525 Cliff Road -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission on March 23, 1982 to consider an application submitted by Mr. Donald Rasmussen for a variance to allow a garage 5' from the rear lot line instead of the 15' as required in the ordinance. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the variance to the City Council. It was noted at the APC hearing that surrounding property owners were not in opposition to the request and if the garage were located 15' instead of the 5' that some maple trees would have to be removed. For a copy of the plan- ning assistant's report, refer to pages 6 Z through 65' For a copy of the minutes regarding the motion, re of r to page ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the variance request by Donald Rasmussen as recommended for approval by the APC. 61 u CITY OF EAGAN E s SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: DONALD RASMUSSEN ` LOCATION: SE; OF SECTION 28, 1525 CLIFF ROAD EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (RFSTDEN'TIAL SINGLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MUCH 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 15, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVE Cxsmm, PIANNINs ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a variance rea_uest from the rear setback requirement for a garage at 1525 Cliff Road. COMMENTS: The applicant would like permission to set a garage 5 feet from the north boundary line rather than the required 15 feet, Therefore, the applicant is requesting a 10' variance. Evidently, the applicant would have to change the driveway and remove some trees if the 15' rear yard setback requirement was fol- lowed. The applicant has talked with the adjacent property owners and they have no objections to the variance. If approved, the application should be subject to the following conditions: 1) The City shall retain all existing drainage and utility easements. 2) All other City ordinances will be oamplied with. DMO/jack • n �'t�z' J A m•-u r . 4l1 w 1 IDT II RASMUSSEN4' jar ACOTION 10 T s Xqs . Ilk - ri• .d a .._ �i p /// • O m • .. .i� • `. _ ♦ 4y 2 1 @ Y L5 •1 ' :.. ' " r ,: ...� w m iia. " .•r, J ' 1 • , • . ! IDf 2 , BLOCK I S - •' r� x. RASMUSSE ! ADDITION ' `r 'ar �/• G n1 �- . -pr OUNTY ,.r. ... ex .>Y>,•e• STATE F I .,...ROAD' ��:_-AID f— "�._. s-,u• um u (oclJT/GW OF ' VHRlHNG E 64 rL1rHil-'-ANDALE .D 77 -21a.. o A Ix MGqS CalL-rs R-1 ��/ i o Z ,P� I ZI or A Ap_j/ s q o p R-4 / a 79-6 a `' RB I A FR Al"C.. S. A H 30.71 - ;" RB p A� q 73 p/ 4 t-4 d' �{ / Q THOMAS \Vf ` v t� i 3 J q HEIGF{'f-� l �OL - PF IR- I NR e,R .D 77 -21a.. A ��T MGqS CalL-rs Rl 1 ZI EAGAN v PF IR- I NR e,R 0 0 DONALD RASMUSSEN - GARAGE VARIANCE The hearing regarding the application of Mr. & Mrs. Donald Rasmussen, who were both present, for variance from rear setback requirement for the con- struction of a garage at 1525 Cliff Road was then considered. There were no objections and Mr. Rasmussen indicated it would be necessary to remove two large maple trees and 50 to 60 peony plants and would also have to change the grade of the road if the variance was not granted. Kroh moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following condi- tions: 1. The City shall retain all existing drainage and utility easements. 2. All other City ordinances shall be met. All voted in favor. M Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Eighteen PRELIMINARY PLAT - OAKWOOD HEIGHTS C. Countryside Builders, Inc., Jerry Lagro, for a Preliminary Plat for Oakwood Heights, Consisting of Approximately 9.59 Acres for Townhouse Development -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the March 23, 1982 APC regular meeting to consider an application for a preliminary plat entitled Oakwood Heights Condominiums consisting of approximately 9.59 acres and containing 60 condominium units. The Advisory Planning Commis- sion, after considerable discussion, is recommending approval to the City Council. The point of main concern expressed by the APC was in regard to the R-2 zoning of the PD and the density allowed by a townhouse development. There was also considerable discussion regarding the private streets vs. public streets and density being allowed to include the private streets but not public. It was noted at the meeting that the area is isolated and there were no objections to the proposed development. There was an additional condition placed on the preliminary plat and that was to reduce the density from the proposed 60 to 55 dwelling units. For addi- tional information on this item, refer to the City Planner's report enclosed on pages (,00 through SO . For an additional report, refer regarding the r3uction in e'nsi-ty, refer to the City Plan- ner's memorandum enclosed on pages ch I through 63 For action that was taken by the APC, refer to pages g!} through 00.< ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Oakwood Heights Condominiums as recommended for approval by the APC. 6-7 0 SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: E CITY OF EAGAN •• 1 • �•. a•,• PART OF THE A OF THE SFA4 OF SECTION 26 PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT) WITH AN R-2, 3-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE MARCH 23, 1982 MARCH 18, 1982 DALE C. RUNXM, CITY PIRRM APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a prelimi- nary plat, Oakwood Heights Condominiums, which consists of approximately 9.59 acres and contains 60 condominium dwelling units. ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently the site is zoned PD (Planned Development District) and has a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed plat is part of the Lexington South Planned Development. The site is designated on the Comprehensive Guide Plan also as R-2, Mixed Residential, with a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. In reviewing the development proposal, the applicant is proposing a town- house condominium development which is consistent with the 3-6 dwelling units per acre. In reviewing the development proposal, staff uses the R-3 zoning category with 6,000 square feet per unit density which would allow 7.26 dwelling units per acre. In reviewing the development proposal, the maxim= allowed units on the site at the 3-6 dwelling units per acre would be 58.5. The applicant is proposing 60 and the overall density of the development is 6.25 units per acre vs. the 6 units per acre allowed in the Planned Development zoning. The applicant is proposing to develop five 4 -unit condominium buildings, two 8 -unit condominium buildings and two 12 -unit condominium buildings for a total of 60 dwell- ing outs. The site is Bordered on the west, north and east by proposed park land and on the south by Wilderness Run Road. Enclosed is a copy of the land use in the Planned Development agreement for your reference. . The site has a substantial amount of topographic relief as mentioned by the Engi- neering Report. This site also is wooded in certain areas so the design has been laid out in accordance with the topography and to preserve as many of the natural trees as possible. The applicant is proposing to provide access to this site from Wilderness Run Road. As mentioned above, park is surrounding all three sides of the development proposal. Therefore, there is no need to provide through access or continuity to other parcels of land adjacent to this development proposal. Therefore, the applicant is providing access to this site by private drives to M CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - OA MM HEIGHTS MMA CH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO provide his own overall circulation for this particular parcel. The applicant is proposing a loop street through the southern portion of the site which will pro- vide access to 48 dwelling units. 'There is also a private drive running to the northern portion of this site which will provide access to the 12 northerly units. Therefore, circulation in this plat is quite good although they are proposed to be private streets. The proposed development consists of 60 dwelling units and has a lot coverage of 18.4%. These densities were calculated not deducting the private street area. The private streets, if dedicated, would consist of approximately 2.2 acres and would allow a maximum of 57 dwelling units if calculated at the R-3 density, or 45 dwelling units, if calculated at 6 units an acre at the net density. The applicant is proposing to provide one garage space and 75 open parking spaces for a total of 2.25 parking spaces per unit. As you are aware, the Coartission will be looking at the ordinance requirement to reduce the parking spaces fran 2.5 to 2 parking spaces per unit in multiple dwellings. Therefore, the applicant will be above the minimum parking req,irpm....nts for the new ordinance. In reviewing the setbacks, it appears all setbacks are met between dwelling units and garage spaces with the exception there should be a 40' setback along Wilder- ness Run Road. Three of the four -unit buildings will have to be shifted to meet this 40' setback requirement. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) A development agreement shall be oanpleted prior to the construction of any of the dwelling units. 2) A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 3) The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowner's Associa- tion bylaws for review. 4) The park dedication has been satisfied with the Lexington South Planned De- velopment. However, the tot lot provision shall be reviewed by the Advi- sory Park Cacmittee for their recomiendations. 5) A 40' setback for all buildings shall be required from Wilderness Run Road. 6) All other City ordinances shall be applicable for the overall development. ENGINEERING RFX.'OIMENDATIGNS 7) An 80' right-of-way should be dedicated for Wilderness Run Road in confor- mance with the existing street and utility easement adjacent to this plat. 8) Internal private drives shall be a minumun 28' in width constructed to a 7 -ton design with concrete curb and gutter. M 0 • CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PIAT - OAKWOOD HEIGHTS MkRCH 23, 1982 PAGE THREE 9) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall'be submitted and approved by the City prior to final plat approval. 10) If installed privately, the utility layout and design shall he as approved by the City. 11) Trunk area stone sewer assessments shall be paid as a condition of final plat approval. 12) A 10' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all boundaries of this proposed plat. TAC/jach 70 0 0 TO: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKIE, CITY PLANNER FROM: TfK)MA,.S A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 18, 1982 RE: PRELLMnkRY PLAT - OAKWOOD HEIGHTS (COUNTRYSIDE BUILDERS INC) The Public Works Department has the following information for consideration of approval for the above -referenced plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water of sufficient size and capacity to service this proposed development was installed under Project 241 within Wilderness Run Road. Lateral extensions frau these trunk utilities will have to be in- stalled through this development to provide individual services. Access to this proposed development will be provided by way of Wilderness Run Road which is presently being constructed under Contract 81-14 (Pro- ject 345). Access throughout the plat is proposed by way of an internal private drive with two points of access onto Wilderness Run Road. Access to the garage units located on the northern portion of this plat adjacent to the Highline Trail would be provided by way of a 650' private drive with a maxim= slope of 8%. Because of the existing topography, there is no practical way to have this private road looped with the other internal road and still be able to maintain a maximum of 8% grade. All private roads within this plat should have a minimum width of 28'. kZvoln"emek,/ 1•• 1 •N There is a 50' differential from the northern end of this plat adjacent to the Highline Trail down to Wilderness Run Road. Storm sewer laterals are Presently being constructed within Wilderness Run Road from which exten- sions can be constructed to provide ,the required internal drainage. Be- cause of this deep topography, extensive erosion control measures will have to be implementedadjacent to Wilderness Run Road. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY While the City has obtained an 80' roadway and utility easement for Wild- erness Run Road, it is recommended that this entire 80' easement be in- corporated as a part of this plat and dedicated as public right-of-way in lieu of the 40' half right-of-way proposed with this plat. All other util- ity easements necessary to provide sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer service will have to be dedicated based on the alignment of final detailed plans and specifications. If not dedicated with the final plat, it will have to be incorporated through a separate utility easement description to be dedicated to the City at a later date. A typical 10' drainage and utility easement should be dedicated adjacent to all boundaries of this plat. i1 0 CITY OF EAGAN OAKVCM.HEIGHTS - ENGINEERING REPORT MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO 0 Trunk area sanitary sewer and water assessments have been levied along with lateral benefit from trunk utilities within Wilderness Run Road under Pro- ject 241 previously. The only additional assessments that would be the responsibility of this proposed subdivision would be the trunk area storm sewer and any assessments associated with the internal streets and/or utili- ties if installed under a City contract. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect of this report at the Planning Commission Meeting of March 23, 1982. Respectfull submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jack _7Z '41� i. PRELIMINARY PLAT OFI OAKWOOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS iy N ur m _ eeWl•nelr.aun+. W Pr rl ru ru uu / _ Wu� W u .r Yrr �.1�411. Y� 11. Yr WU. uwuu •uuw u Vuw Y1� YI�.VIu.w u :.uw.Yr IYII �: •I r. r�ruu Ilrs 1.1 yyl4�rulrr1Y11. IY..rrl�4 rvpu I.1 Ir.yV P lur M 1 Wr'r 1' . W' rwxV wr. uuir Y� "'1 —. I Yr w� Ilu w .r Wu 1 W. r��r�uu oz jaajtaat SNua 3g� �� Y 06W LOCATION MAP I egr a •�ctVYY. Y � , �•• J_Ts' QY� , r��r�uu oz jaajtaat SNua 3g� �� Y 06W C'T'. nam p SITE PLAN t ^_I .-Ie' ler, 1 ...Ir r rr SITE EWx GENERAL NOTES L 1a t ewa tw+ f4-R.fK .YN L. ELv ane u E ..l E nwouw n ur t dw nexfx\ elruLEx ftIIIIEVV uvo wd aYtm.u.\ u fx., • dwcufwn eLrueLx edvd.ws uL fes Wawa\ IS .fW �TAwuW\r MLx {O*OnM wWe\f fx[x VAr .pA. C4L w+I . 1.1y fro\ bdfplKNSI NAGS YLf1YKVN. rul :BITE INFORMATION! SITE ala Ln.SSl \an S." E:u\ W.I. eau mww L'It Vwr LOY{Own Ww\N wnf f a ..ITLOVOruxNw\ -LO VMrf l a mm l wm,Na s -11. YWrf rOT4- 4e YxIT, . Its wT wL Yn WR SIZE, N f emrmw ♦ Ymn Z eeoaoxw um art -1e YxIrf t seorcdw b Yw11L T ST... um o,Y - u 1+ torp -b Yw ft.. AT LESfTEuf rta wn . IS II.. wECL 1unx4 .u\ m WEll Aaxw .w\ )T Alt1uG 1S f+w.\ rmx m frxw EoxuLn uE[wun urxauw A _ Tm LOT O � I E Rxn . Yxn I 1xxT { VxITE W."L r4xnxr J= % p SITE PLAN t ^_I .-Ie' ler, 1 ...Ir r rr SITE EWx GENERAL NOTES L 1a t ewa tw+ f4-R.fK .YN L. ELv ane u E ..l E nwouw n ur t dw nexfx\ elruLEx ftIIIIEVV uvo wd aYtm.u.\ u fx., • dwcufwn eLrueLx edvd.ws uL fes Wawa\ IS .fW �TAwuW\r MLx {O*OnM wWe\f fx[x VAr .pA. C4L w+I . 1.1y fro\ bdfplKNSI NAGS YLf1YKVN. rul :BITE INFORMATION! SITE ala Ln.SSl \an S." E:u\ W.I. eau mww L'It Vwr LOY{Own Ww\N wnf f a ..ITLOVOruxNw\ -LO VMrf l a mm l wm,Na s -11. YWrf rOT4- 4e YxIT, . Its wT wL Yn WR SIZE, N f emrmw ♦ Ymn Z eeoaoxw um art -1e YxIrf t seorcdw b Yw11L T ST... um o,Y - u 1+ torp -b Yw ft.. AT LESfTEuf rta wn . IS II.. wECL 1unx4 .u\ m WEll Aaxw .w\ )T Alt1uG 1S f+w.\ rmx m frxw 4 Unit Building Front Elevation V.." Talented INIMENG 8 Unit Building Front Eta atlonj m 12 Unit Building Front Elevation "..W Side Elevation Side Elevation i Side El y.. '..W Sect. At Balcony SNININOGNOO S1H•JI3H OOOMMtlO u LANDSCAPE PLAN MC3= mmcm mmm =330 mmcm � ffi��Wm ti A tel, -o _ - - -__ •L� `I�_ �,,��1,�� c {0. +- No I= SUNNI& NN Ml Ml �'ri� / 4 •S• � r. \. mss' �, - t.:•. nunlnutnnluuiniuuiiyu�inuuitt�ytlt• f4tttiintlmtut ., unnnunnt�iunFu�itiFnnunnnuu pie MOW bb P p -R41 Eo R-11 R-1 tB > /i= VALL—E R-11 R-11 X� —R—I 711 p ,0 rA..Mrs. GB Hlu. In COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT' Ind Ind' �WB p4ill /Ind. -G —R—I 711 p yL `•y' • A PF r _ . R, -T R F I W V1 NT.��e81if3Y • . .rim c'I // 0 • TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMIN FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: APRIL 16, 1982 RE: UPDATE CN OAKWOOD HEIGHTS CONDCMINIUMS On March 23, 1982, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing for Oakwood Heights Condominium development proposal. The Advisory Plan- ning Commission reoommended approval with the understanding that the devel- oper would reduce the density from 60 dwelling units to 55 dwelling units. Enclosed is a revised site plan indicating where the 5 dwelling unit reduc- tion has been made. The last item regarding this staff report is to bring to your attention the paragraph in regard to zoning and land use. Staff has indicated that the planned development is presently zoned R-2 and has a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre. This area in the Comprehensive Guide Plan is also designated R -II which indicates a land use proposed at 3 units per acre. The applicant in developing this particular site has proposed a townhouse development proposal. When looking at Ordinance 52, Zoning or- dinance.in regard to townhouse development, the density allowed for town- houses is 6,000 square feet per unit, or 7.26 dwelling units per net acre. So, there is inconsistency between the density allowed in an R-2 PD with a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre vs. the townhouse development ser tion in the Zoning Ordinance which allows 7.26 units per net acre. This situation has come up before and hopefully staff can get direction from the City as to how the City would want to treat the inconsistency between a planned development zoning with 3-6 dwelling units per acre and the town- house zoning which would allow 7.26 units per acre on a net area. In reviewing this development proposal, because of the inconsistency be- tween an R-2 planned development and R -II, 3-6 dwelling units per acre pro- posed for land use and the townhouse density in the Zoning Ordinance which allows 7.26 dwelling units per acre, staff has a suggestion they would like to pass on for consideration. This suggestion would be amending Ordinance 52 in regard to the R-3 zoning classification. Instead of allowing a maxi - nun density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre on a net basis in an R-3 Dis- trict, that the R-3 District be reduced in density to a maxim= of 6 dwell- ing units per acre. There could be a subcategory in the R-3 District as an R -3A which would address townhouse or condominium units which have two common walls. Where buildings have two common walls, the land area used by development is less such as a quadramminiumu complex than compared to a townhouse or row house where there are not always two cannon walls. So, the R -3A category could have a maximuan of 6,000 square feet per unit or 7.26 dwelling units per acre. The third category in the R-3 District would be R -3B which would take into account the new buildings which have r:ome on the market which are the 8 -unit coach homes or condominiun unit. The 8-plex is really the stacking of two 4-plexes and the 8-plex does not really fit into an R-4, Residential Multiple District, or an R-3, Town- house District. Staff is suggesting that a new designation of R -3B be a Thomas L. Hedges Update on Oakwood Heights Condaniniums April 16; 1982 Page two set up to address the 8-plex dwelling units which have just recently cane into the marketplace. If the City would like to investigate the possibilities of splitting the R-3 District into sub -categories and allowing different units in each Dis- trict, staff can work on a proposed amendment describing the type of units that would be allowed in each of the subheadings plus a density that could work for each of the subheadings. At the present time, staff has not thor- oughly investigated this concept, but if there is favorable discussion in regard to this concept, staff would be glad to research this new proposal. If anyone has any additional caunpnts or questions regarding this subdivi- sion of a zoning classification, staff would be glad to address this item at the April 20, 1982 City Council meeting. DCR/jach W. FOND C IL SITE FLAN • I...' V— C)ML N 64 as 0 E 41170 WK . I." AWES WILDING OREARIUNN 2 -ID UNN W.M.INUMS 40 UrYq E -E UNIT CeY00NWNME Ib IWNE ♦-s UNIT L...MIYryMS 1Y Owl 1-3UNR CmpoNlNllMlf ] UNITS TOTAL — SS UNITS . 5.14 UNITS PE. ALOE UNIT OIIEAE W.m 5 CEOW0` 6 UNITS Z eEp/GeN WIN CVT -4 INN] E 5-0—H 25 UNITS 1 EEpNWM WIN MN—6 UNITS TOM 55 U.Irs YAREING AT 2.25 STALLS RE WIT . ITA STALLS MREING rROIMEO GAEAOfi MAAING 64 SrNiS DAWE NAY YAECING Y♦ ST.LLLS GUEST YAREMG Tl STALLS TOM � 160 STALLS APC Minutes March 23, 1982 OAKWOOD HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS - PRELIMINARY PLAT The application of Countryside Builders and Jerry Lagro for preliminary plat approval of Oakwood Heights Condominiums consisting of 9.95 acres and 60 condominium dwelling units was then considered by the Council. Mr. Darrel Anderson, architect, and Mr. Lagro were present. The project would consist of 12 different unit plans and three building types on a very rough parcel of property north of Wilderness Run Road in a portion of the Lexington South Planned Development. Mr. Anderson indicated that the developer would attempt to save as many oak trees as possible, that a tot lot would be provided, that a private street would be provided on the north, there would be two spaces per unit for parking and additional guest parking would be available. He re- quested the increase in density to 64 units, but indicated that he misunder- stood the density requirements under the ordinance, basing that request on 6,000 square feet per unit. The units would be 800 to 1,300 square feet in size and there would be a minimum 40 foot setback along Wilderness Run Road. It was noted that in order to comply with the ordinance requirements, that it would be necessary to reduce the density to approximately 57.5 dwelling units in the area zoned planned development, allowing 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre. If the streets are all public, it would also reduce the acreage by about 2 additional acres for computation of density. The prices would range from $58,000.00 to $82,000.00 per unit. It was noted that lower density generally is provided around the area, except to the east. Mr. Anderson indicated that the developer would comply with the density requirements of the City. McCrea moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following: 1. That density not exceed 55 units in the project. 2. A development agreement shall be completed prior to the construction of any of the dwelling units. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not re- leased until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 4. The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowner's Association Articles and Bylaws for review. 5. The park dedication has been satisfied with the Lexington South Planned Development. However, a tot lot shall be included and its plan shall be reviewed by the Advisory Park Committee for its recommendations. 6. A 40 foot setback for all buildings shall be required from Wilder- ness Run Road. 7. All other City ordinances shall be applicable for the overall development. 84 6 0 APC Minutes March 23, 1982 8. An 80 foot right-of-way should be dedicated for Wilderness Run Road in conformance with the existing street and utility easement adjacent to this plat. 9. Internal private drives shall be a minimum 28 feet in width con- structed to a 7 -ton design with concrete curb and gutter. 10. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to final plat approval. 11. If installed privately, the utility layout and design shall be as approved by the City. 12. Trunk area storm sewer assessments shall be paid as a condition of final plat approval. 13. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all lot boundaries in this proposed plat. Those in favor were McCrea, Turnham, Wilkins and Hall. Those against were Bohne, Brob and Wold. Those voting no were concerned about the density being too high on the parcel of property. It was suggested by Planning Commission members that the staff review a potential reduction of 2 units in the buildings facing the pond on the east. 65 9 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Nineteen PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS D. Midwestern Associates, Orrin Aune, for Preliminary Plat, Lone Oak Heights, Consisting of Approximately 14 Acres -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting on March 23, 1982, to consider an application for a preliminary plat of Lone Oak Heights consisting of approxi- mately 14.09 acres and containing 125 dwelling units. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the Lone Oak Heights preliminary plat subject to conditions listed in the staff report. There is a lengthy discussion regarding the preliminary plat that was originally submitted to the APC and the concerns were discussed that the City Council had when they denied the original application. For additional information on this item, refer to the planning assistant's report enclosed on pages 1_ through 1bFor additional information regarding the action that was to en y the APC, refer to pages JD S through 106 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC to approve the Lone Oak Heights prelimi- nary plat. 1961 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - LCNE OAK HEIGHTS APPLICANT: MIDWESTERN ASSOCIATES - ORRIN AUNE LOCATION: NE; OF THE NE; OF SECTION 9 EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) WITH R-3 (RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE AND R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE) UNDERLYING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 17, 1982 REPORTED BY: DAVID M. OSBERG, PLANNING ASSISTANT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for preliminary plat approval of Lone Oak Heights, which consists of approximately 14.09 acres and contains 125 dwelling units. ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently, the parcel is zoned R-3 (Residential Townhouse) and R-4 (Residential Multiple) with a PD (Planned Developnent) zoning overlaying the entire parcel. The land use guide designates the 14 -acre parcel as an R-3 land use (Mixed Residential) with a density of 6-12 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development will consist of approximately 10.1 dwelling units per acre which is consistent with the Land Use Guide Plan. BACKGROUND: As you may recall, a public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the September 22, 1981 meeting to consider a preliminary plat for Lone Oak Heights. The APC recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to several conditions. The City Council discussed the preliminary plat application for Ione Oak Heights at the October 20, 1981 meeting. In order to study the potential costs of dawn -zoning the subject parcel, the City Council con- tinued the preliminary plat application until the study could be cmgileted. After reviewing the down -zoning study and after considerable discussion, the City Coun- cil denied the preliminary plat for Ione Oak Heights at the January 19, 1982 meet- ing. The reasons for denial were: 1) The proposed north/south road (Shield's Lane) was too close to Pilot Knob School as it ran directly along the east boundary of the school. 2) The proposed plat exceeded the allowable lot coverage by .98. The R-4 area lot coverage was at 20.9% and the ordinance allows 20%. 3) The proposal for parking for the overall development was less than the 2.5 spaces per unit requirement.' The applicant is proposing to develop the parcel with condominiums and town- houses and guadraminium5. The proposed plan will consist of 2 condominium build- ings with 36 dwelling units each, 33 townhouses and 20 quadraminium dwelling units. $'7 CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO As stated earlier, the parcel is divided into two areas according to the zoning. The R-3 parcel consists of 7.5 net acres and would allow 54 dwelling units. The developer is proposing to develop 53 dwelling units in the R-3 parcel for a total of 7 dwelling units per acre. The R-4 parcel consists of 4.7 net acres with a density determined on a sliding scale. The two condaninium buildings will be 3 stories and contain 36 one -bedroom units and 36 two-bedroom.units. The zoning ordinance would require 194,400 square feet with a mix of bedrooms as proposed. The net area of the R-4 parcel is 206,944 square feet which is 12,544 square feet over the zoning ordinance requirement. Be- low is a density chart describing each of the parcels. PARCEL ACRES LOT DWELLING DWG.UNITS PROPOSED REQUIRED USE COVERAGE UNITS ALLOWED PARKING PARKING Condominiums 4.7 12.6% 72 180 180 Townhouses 7.5 17.68 53 54 132.5 132.5 Parcel No. 1 - Condaninium Apartments - The applicant is proposing two 36 -unit condominium buildings. Each of the condominium buildings is 26,260 square feet in size. The net area of the R-4 parcel is 206,994 square feet. The lot coverage of the two condominium buildings is 12.69% which is under the 20% allowable cover- age requirement. There are 72 dwelling units on the R-4 parcel which is 4.7 net acres which equals 15.1 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing un- derground garages for the covered parking space requirements. These will be 1.5 Open parking spaces per dwelling unit which meets the present requirement. If the City feels two parking spaces per dwelling unit is sufficient, the applicant would be agreeable to such a plan. All setback requirements have been met for the condominium buildings. Patcel No. 2 - Townhouse Development - Parcel 2 is proposed to be constructed with 20 quadraminium dwelling units and 33 townhouse dwelling units. The required site area for the 53 dwelling units is 318,000 square feet and the applicant is pro- viding 328,829 square feet. Therefore, the applicant is providing an additional 10,829 square feet of area in the R-3 parcel. The 33 townhouse units and 20 quad- raminium units have a total building area of 57,752 square feet which is 17.6% of the total area provided in the R-3 parcel. The 53 dwelling units are located on the 7.5 net acres of the R-3 parcel which equals 7 dwelling units per acre. The access to the property will be from Lone Oak Road on the north and Towerview Drive on the south. The applicant is proposing a 60' wide public street to run north/ south through the development. As stated earlier, one of the reasons the City Council turned dawn the original preliminary plat for Lone Oak Heights was due to the fact that this proposed north/south road (Shield's Lane) was too close to the Pilot Knob School. In an effort to meet the City Council requirements, the devel- oper has relocated the road away from the school and centered on the property. 04 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE THREE There are still some questions regarding the gas main which crosses the norther- ly portion of the property: Staff has been contacted by a representative from Northern States Power, and they would like this preliminary plat to be subject to the relocation of the gasline easement to the satisfaction of Northern States Power. The southwest portion of the plat abuts Pilot Knob Park. The northerly portion of the plat abuts Pilot Knob School. Therefore, there is open space immediately to the west to provide the park needs. It is staff's understanding that the applicant has dedicated the land for Pilot Knob Park. Therefore, there will be no park dedication for this proposed development. However, staff is requesting that there be a trail connection from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School some- where between the condominium project and the townhouse development. The appli- cant shall also provide one tot lot to provide the needs for the pre-schoolers within this development proposal. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) If the site plan is approved, the gas main shall be relocated as to not interfere with any of the proposed buildings and also to the satisfaction of the Northern States Power Company. 2) The plat should be subject to all easements as required by City staff. 3) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City staff. 4) A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with the final plat and not released until one year after the landscaping has been conpleted. 5) The developer shall provide a tot lot for the proposed pre-schoolers with- in the development. 6) The developer shall construct a trail from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School between the condominiiun and townhouse developrent. 7) The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowner's Asso- ciation bylaws for City review. 8) A development agreement and planned development agreement shall be approved prior to the final plat application. 9) The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Ccrmission since the plat abuts two County roads. nmo/jack Sy CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - IC)NE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE FOUR ENGINEERING RECCD4MEN MATIONS 10) A 10' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public right-of-way and along the west boundary line. In addition, drainage and utility easements incorporating the internal utilities re- quired to servioe this development shall be dedicated as a part of the final plat. 11) The internal private road shall be constructed to a 28' minimum width with concrete curb and gutter to City approved plans and specifications. 12) Previously deferred trunk area water assessments and lateral benefit from trunk water main shall be assumed by this development as a oondi- tion of final plat approval. 13) A 30' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Toaerview Road. 14) Towerview Road shall be ordered for improvement prior to final plat approval. TAC/jach L 0 0 70: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COPM4ISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: MARCH 18, 1982 I RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS ADDITION (MIDWESTERN ASSOCIATES) The Public Works Department has the following oomrents to offer for consid- eration of the above -referenced plat: UTILITIES Sanitary surer of sufficient size and elevation is available by way of the recent extension of the sanitary sewer from the east side of Pilot Knob Road under Project 347 in 1981. Water service is available frau the existing 12" trunk water main on Lone Oak Road and the existing 12" trunk water main on Towerview Road. An internal water lateral connecting these two trunks through this plat will provide the internal water service of sufficient pressure and capacity to handle this proposal. The general topography of this property slopes from the north and south to- wards the middle of this plat where there presently exists a 24" trunk storm sewer. This storm sewer has sufficient capacity to handle the anticipated drainage from this proposed development. The internal laterals and catch basins will be required to convey the drainage to this tank facility. Y: X*b- Access to this proposed development will be provided by an internal public street connecting Lone Oak Road with Towerview Road. Lone Oak Road was re- cently upgraded to its final design standard as a part of the Pilot Knob Rd. upgrading in 1981. However, Towerview Road presently exists as a substan- dard gravel road providing access to the Univac water reservoir. Towerview Road will have to be upgraded to the City standards from Pilot Knob Road to the west boundary of the park property adjacent to this development as a condition of this plat. This upgraded road will provide the acess to this plat and Sperry Univac's addition which is presently under construction. The developer is proposing to service the townhouse units adjacent to Pilot Knob Road by way of an internal looped private drive. This private road should be constructed to a minimum width of 28' with concrete curb and gut- ter to a 5 -ton design. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY Sufficient right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road and Lone Oak Road has been pre- viously acquired by the County in conjunction with the recent upgrading in 1981. A 30' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Towarview Road adja- cent to the southern boundary of this plat. The internal public road shall be provided by way of a 60' public dedication of road right-of-way. Typical 91 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN ENGINEERING REPORT - LONE OAK HEIGHTS MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO 10' drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated adjacent to all private property and public right-of-way adjacent to or within this peat. Internal drainage and utility easements must be dedicated to provide for the installa- tion of public utilities to service this development. The exact location will be defined at the time of detailed plans and specification preparation. The location of the proposed westerly condominium facility requires the relo- cation of the existing Northern States Power gasline easement. This relocation shall be in conformance with NSP requirements. k� u5i-2TUR- The following outstanding assessments will be the responsibility of this de- velopment as a condition of final plat approval. They are calculated in ac- cordance with the 1982 rates. However, they shall be levied at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 1) Trunk area water assessment (defenrent from 1976) at $995/acre 13,631.50 2) Lateral benefit from trunk water main (Towerview Rd) at $18/ft. 10,362.60 TOTAL: $23,994.10 There are presently several pending assessments associated with the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road pertaining to street improvements and/or trunk storm sewer costs under Projects 200 and 177 respectively. All costs associated with the internal distribution of streets and/or utilities will be the responsibility of this subdivision. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect of this report at the Planning Comaissicn Meeting of March 23, 1982. Respectfully submitted, oot�� A -d Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public works TAC/jack 9a. Q nl Engineers Land surveyors • • Planners /alley Engineering Co., Inc. Telephone 447-2570 Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 J LONE OAK HEIGHTS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CITY OF EAGAN OWNER/DEVELOPER: Midwestern Associates, 8337 Delaney Circle, Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota. 55075 Telephone: 459-7120 (Orin Aune) CONSULTANT: Valley Engineering Company, Inc., Ron Swanson/Steve Harvey, P.O. Box 478, Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372, Telephone: 447-2570 PROPERTY LOCATION: The proposed project is located in the Southwest Quadrant of Lone Oak Road (Co. Rd. No. 26) and Pilot Knob Road (Co. Rd. No. 31). PROPOSAL: The site is presently zoned PD (Planned Development) with an underlying zoning of R-3 (Residential Townhouse District) and R-4 (Residential Multiple District). The city land use guide designates the site as R-3 land use (Mixed Residential) with a density of 6-12 dwelling units per acre. The request is presently submitted with 125 dwelling units on 12.30 net acres giving an over all density of 10.2 dwelling units per acre which is consistent with the land use guide plan. GENERAL: Lone Oak Heights was before the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission for a public hearing on September 22nd, 1981. The project was given preliminary approval at the time subject to several conditions. Following the Planning Commission approval there were several meetings before the Eagan City Council. On January 19th, 1982 at a regular meeting of the Eagan City Council the project was turned down for the following stated reasons. 1. The proposed north -south road (Shields Lane) was too close to Pilot Knob School (the road on the original submittal ran along the east boundary of the school). It was agreed that the road should be a through street between Towerview and Lone Oak. W LONE OAK HEIGHTS • • page 2 2. The proposed plat exceeded the allowable lot coverage by .9% i.e. the R-4 area lot coverage was at 20.9% and the ordinance allows 20%. As shown on the herein contained site data sheets the revised proposal has met or exceeded all of the lot area, coverage and density requirements as set forth in City Ordinance No. 52. The road has also been relocated away from the school and centered on the property. This meets the Council requirements and also is in harmony with the Dakota County requirements as set forth in the attached letter. (see Exhibit "A" attached hereto). DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES: It is the intent of the Developer to develop the PD in phases beginning with the most northerly condominium building as Phase I and the quadraminium units as Phase II anticipating an absorption rate of 40 to 45 dwelling units per year. The estimated price range of the units could be $40,000 to $50,000 and would be sold in fee as individual units with two separate Home Owners Associations, one for the condominium units and one the townhouse quadraminium units, It is the intent of the Developer to provide the required landscaping, screening, etc., and to use construction materials in conjunction with architecturally designed facades for a pleasing visual effect. Each townhouse and quadraminium lot could have its own designed landscape plan consistent with its building type. All parking would be paved and non -landscaped areas would be sodded. The. proposed minimmi set. -Leaks are consitent with the zoning ordinances for the total site. Financing for the PD would be through conventional methods and FHA and GI Guaranteed Home Loan programs through Banco Corp. The Developers Financial capabilities can be verified by personal statements and/or conformation from the Developers bank if required. CIRCULATION/POPULATION• The proposed PD will have excellent access to both county and state highways. - The toal site will have vehicular access to Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road via the proposed north south collocter street (Shields Lane) and Towerview Road as shown on the proposed plat. Pilot Knob Road has been upgraded to provide access to the proposed interstate 35E and 494 intersection. At present there is a city park adjacent to the southwestern boundary of the site and an elementary school on the northwestern boundary. The proposed PD provides for a walkway access to carry the present and future pedestrian traffic from Pilot Knob Road to the western boundary. It has been estimated that the population of the PD will be 342 of which 41 will be school age children. W. LANE OAK IIEIG11TS • • page 3 LANE OAK HEIGHT'S, EAGAN, MINNESOTA SITE DATA SELEET TOTAL PLAT AREA = 104,400 Sq. Ft. 36 - 2 - Bedroom units @ 3,100 Sq. Ft. - 111,600 Gross Area = 630,710.2 Sq. Ft. = 14.479 Ac. + Less Shields Lane _ -21,600 Sq Ft R/W = 77,257.7 Sq. Ft. _ -1.7.74 Ac. + Less Towerview R/W 17,629.4 Sq. Ft. _ -0.405 Ac + Net Total Plat Area 535,823.1 Sq. Ft. = 12.300 Ac. + R-4 AREA, DENSITY AND LOT COVERAGE Gross R-4 Area = 244,820.7 Sq. Ft. = 5.620 Ac. + Less Shields Lane RAW = -37,826.6 Sq. Ft. _ -0.868 Ac + Net R-4 Area = 206,994.1 Sq. Ft. = 4.752 Ac. + 36 - 1 - Bedroom units @ 2,900 Sq. Ft. = 104,400 Sq. Ft. 36 - 2 - Bedroom units @ 3,100 Sq. Ft. - 111,600 Sq. Ft. Less credit for underground parking (per ordinance) (72 x 300) _ -21,600 Sq Ft Net R-4 Area required = - 194,400 Sq. Ft. Net R-4 Area Provided = 206,944 Sq. Ft. * Proposed R-4 is 948 of allowable density PARKING REQUIREMENTS PER ORD. Required 2.5 per unit = 72 x 2.5 = 180 Parking stalls Provided = 72 Garages 108 Parkinq Stalls Total Provided on plan QS 180 Parking units LANE OAK tIEIarrs • • page 4 COVERAGE FOR PROPOSED R-4 2 Buildings @ 202 x 65 = 26,260 Sq. Ft./206,994 Sq. Ft. = 12.698 Allowable Coverage = :.0.008 DENSITY 72 Du/4.752 net acres = 15.15 Dwelling units per acre R-3 AREA, DENSITY AND IAT COVERAGE Gross R-3 Area = 385,889.5 Sq. Ft. = 8.859 Acres + Less Shields Lane R/W = 39,431.1 Sq. Ft. _ -0.905 Acres + Less Towerview R/W = 17 629.4 Sq. Ft = -0.405 Acres + Net P,-3 Area = 328,829 Sq. Ft. = 7.549 Acres + PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS AND AREA REQUIREMENTS Quadraminium Units 20 Townhouse Units = 33 Net Proposed Dwelling Units = 53 Total Area Required by Ord. = 53 x 6000 Sq. Ft. = 318,000 Sq. Ft. Total Area Provided = 328,829 Sq. Ft. Proposed R-3 is 96.78 of allowable density or 54.8 D.U. allowed. COVERAGE FOR PROPOSED R-3 33 Townhouse units Building area = 39,272 Sq. Ft. 20 Quadraminium unit Building Area = 18,480 Sq. Ft. Total Building Area = 57,752 Sq. Ft. R-3 Lot coverage = 57,752 Sq. Ft./328,829 Sq. Ft. = 17.68 Allowable Coverage = 20.08 Density 53 Du/7.549 net acres = 7.02 dwelling units per acre 96 0 0 WN o Ln II I q .05 51 1P ".+'1'7•!, Ch e_i 46 •FO: WNE OAK HEIGHM • • page 6 OFSCRIMcbm VCP PFCPMM PUS 1'he •�,rthraast '?Carter ^.f Che wnrvaast ?l.L-tom of ,i¢uor. 9, :bunsr_p 27, P.vge 21, Dakota c�Jry, 'L nCyta es.OL•pt tar, ChLrClT [re !Ol'OVllq: 1 1. - x FAM of Cie brLhmst %1 rte, (`M 1/4. of LY `brtaast garter 00: 1/4) Of Seata= 9itr M. 7�..+3P (27;, Pange :`.en-i-L`_ee 1211. par lc.larly ieserlLsd as foul -: BTR" "LAR at L^.e L':.arsectlw' of the .E45t 1Lb Of 0SL'Jld i LMherline Pildmion as Oldt`ed and he rcrh Ise of s¢tlon N. , (91, T7rship :`Je7ri-selsan (271. Page twenty -throe (211; thence SouCl a:0a3 sail E.ut lire a !"canoe Of !60 feet to a mint on sail lire: tk t ?Aat a'urq a lire parallel to LY north 1Lne of read S¢r..., a distance of 959 feet to a poilt: the.'noe .•orth along a line parallel to the east lib 9f !§L'urd TL-nherlire AGdl On m lecr� s 1:sta.'nre 1! 560 !tie m a mine On V.a Nath line of sad Section vine (9); thetce West aLOnq •le 'lort. 1 Lne Of saw Soction (9) a dstance of 959 feet to the place Oi beginning. 2. mat part of the'brtasst ?tarter. ( !'_-e;C a. !esQahnd as follows: L'4) of Section 9. lbwctsRlP 27, Pange 23, (lalota County, :ore+er:� at h NO2b.lst corner of h xn-heast 7LL a (%T. 1/6) of L4 !10_2^^else 4: of 3h- 'Cn 9: tnen0e SaaLh ,O !ewes :2 -_rtes .2 seconds Vest (for the pi= -poses of _.e `ort`. 1 e of Lhe'or-:�ast !`Z 1;'4: of Lha ,' 1: J'. v;! 5 aticn 9 Fes sr. ssnrec Saar Lr, O: -; = 39 .!e es fe53 :i-a:tes 20 seeds East , to Lb b..= :"nc C. the bre.`. f60.00 feet Of sa:c 'for-1a"t [.Carter i'$ 1/4) Of Lhe'i.^_heast -- tar ,!` .. 4• , L nal%' beL-R the poll Of �L'�,L-( Jf the Land t0 he dewcribed; the'te cont. - .+s _`• '-c,r� 02 .i'a:tes 12 se rds +est 5 the South lane Of said :or -:east tar 'L L/1 Jf Ca 'or-. est _Latter lsE 1/41 : Lhe.'ce Easter'y along the Stitlt line of said !or_mse. 21u. ;%T. ;'4: of the 47R7Baat a_ - (SE 1:41 a dista:noe of 666.61 Leet; thence north 0 :earees C2 -,[antes C] seconds East m the SOC. lib of the Notch 66C.00 feet of rain !ortteast ?-l^.eh :!S L6) of the !orhmstr%E L'/1: thence Westerly along the South 1Lne ebrtr 660.00 feet Of said ;orthmvt purer !!E 1/4) of the NorthOaat OL-iteer AT. 1/41 W _A Point of hrl ll21;, 7. :'hat a= Of the no= - t quarter Of Che northeast aura- of Section 9. Tc~.ip 27, Pa -3e 23, Caota SO_.c/, 4:' SOU, lying south of t+* north. 13.00 Leet LhermL s6•ich Lin east of Line I aril went Of Line 2 de sQ iEed as follows: Line L " a line 55.00 feet .est of " rnmsured at rivet a:glm m and parallel nnth, the dm[bed 1Lne. Be9+nnuq at the norta.wmt corner of said Sean 10: hence south 4�Mrq the west lib of said sedan 10 a listiice cf 462.39 feet; tteree alenq a -aN,-tial =--e no Lb right, tiavi.n7 a central a-q'e of 1 teree N �.L-ntes 00 seconds and a mngmt 1:,.: feet, a dSta:e c[ 2::'.f feet: LhG7Q scutleily tangmc m h fast dere: !Sed :_:era iia -�-ae Of :59.13 feet: Lnence Alt.= a rar,ent:al Curve to the left. cawing a certraL a'y'e of ' 1e :m OC ai_tm 00 s®nds are a ta'gent of L00.00 feet, a distance of 2:0.0[ feet: Lhe-:a southerly ".-Rent o the last fesCr Lhed nava a distance of 200.00 Leet [here ten: _rata. -R. line 2 ins s lona ]]. _ es feet .t of, AS omsu_-ec at right angles to and Parallel with, a Lane 1rr. - f -'7e a vc= W. Che nOr�. ." of C`e .['Laos[ � •,fret Of Still 10, :br. S'niF 27, Page 2/, 3ni3ta Cao:_!, :i7res-tat distant 9.90 feet east of Che mrt:4wmt cotter thereof to s Pent On L`e south line Of Lha nort:swmt gdrrr of thecor'srst quarrsr oC sand Sectlw Sis-s-.e . 70 fat out of Che southwest to Lh Wf. -CLhe w;L`. the south 22.00 fat of L`e vLh 55.^C Lat of the :orhmst quur of the :or_hmst ACL' -! SA -.d Sat �Cn i 1J1C� -.25 'RSC of the i':r9-fit:omd LLb 1 a'�d east Of the lest '.:9.0. feet c! Lhe ncrheast ^ ,• er of h nort:east of seat- Section. 9. J. `:at lar- of C'a :S ','4 Of the [S L7 0t sect -.In 9. ---P..!p 21. P.Vne 23 ly: q north are asst .f 9r-er'L;on s l !ve ol! risl:uo!+ay for :pro 31R load And ?:lot Ic'oo Poall . El V February 1, 1982 • 0 DAKOTA I' II I'NT Y 'DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 HWY. 55. HASTINGS. MINNESOTA S!O]] EXHI Bl T 'q" Mr. Orin Aune Midwestern Association 1405 Lone Oak Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Mr. Aune: ROBERT P SANDEEN.E couNrY E.I::N1.Qq TE' -E -HONE 612-417 0!98 As we discussed, upon review of the proposed plat at the southwest corner of Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road, I submit the following: 1. Because of conflicts with heavy traffic on Pilot Knob Road, lack of right turn lane, grade conflicts and left turn congestion at the Lone Oak signal, only access from Lone Oak Road (300' west of intersection) and Tower View Road will be allowed. Is Sincerely, Larry G. Figgins, P.E. Administrative Design Engineer LGF/bv GM r. 0 E PILOT KNOB ROAD (CO GOAD M 3/ ) w—' L— • r O LI � M ••1 O n m n ob i6C °og p �o � _ten, . ffd, •� SUITE 3G4, 'wn'EaS ED]E C•EEICE VLA:p .••v BO BOX a•B PTOR LC E. •.IIMNES 'A S53:. • TELEPHONE 162144?- 10 LONE OA. HEIGHT'S _ LOME OAK__ 1 1 (CO. HOLD M w.•M__ •� Imo_ ' fI �i .i i i i � :f1 `\ 1/S•� 1544 '��•� � � � I:: _ ^I '1741 its � 1 1 is � _r [Cliff �`\ •�Id, _ ;.. --�; , i 01 .. - 92 ! LEGEND �.�,-f�/,• ? / . % !: / •�— 1 III I '. ; vl.wn scrw —s—.� _a -r-- 1 \ \ T' a \ /,y/I /ve 4J\ to i ''.-ri: ' / aj j• ..� ' ��.' / T�''I' 1 I m 1 I i+ Ili Ir :71 ::SF :71 v 11 i / /� 11_x-- YI a �...��•..� —_. .__ _.. TOwEA'/'EM 9ar;��•. _ROAD 161 77 'li g�; 1°11!. ' fell ON Ji11'' -- ----- - avoe BU7 03 ONM- — ___---- - - , �mjg � _ <rn _-• --- mei l _ i� f ^� -} - - � _ � Jl=. _,_. a __ _ _ f•ifsi�Y' _ - .gumta F a: rio anY—r:"'�• �° •07 .i'i' TT_ .e, ' of I •.�� .iii _ � '/, .,r' . ��'` �g �`_ ��� :111- r.._ ; � �~� • - -�,: �� --- i, ; ,%�•�' - ��� �\, . �• � . who �8 l �.� .f 0 .� \_� I \\ 1 1.1 �, /,•'r I' I • rrww =oLEI �Z I — is '� ~: —- .• i� :� ���; � -- .� o. —� 1 T •_ , I, I. N — I 1I MENDOTA \ FS. -' .y - RB GB 'Ind - _• _ t, / i .. - r :::::.. a.. . i9•- Ind; i COMMEI .• j - -` "• 'l':•- ,i' �_ PLANNED DE' LB RD R. a_ I•_ F R-11 fill � - �•„v,v,,,,y, _ � _ sVA(R�TE _ �`"`._ -�� Ind � � _ .`../� `>�% R•I-I! �L „P �IJ-•�1 WL RN R-III • - � � .moi �•�• .� I - � ©� „fl �� — Cc Ind NB P NRS ''� /: • R-II - RIIS- ` « ew .ri `:• LB - ]' -. ie.—..'•� ����;,� • P — - ®RBI Y - .,R•il a , r —• `] R•1` '.% �� ! "� \�\v .' w.? ' "��j��.'i r �' . «I� � I� r.1 R•II� G Vjy�.. �� L R-11 _ p' j', R•III,.w,.; .,,t �';w.e.... R-I _ .�,.y: R-1,• : l '-- E - _ -P .• ®, , J R-II I.� _ I-II i d'.• R-1 _� Ir- :.l '"RIII . �, �.. l'-'. • CTTY II Lr R-II , ;HALL• / R-I R I F R-II� - 1-.—• -� �p HS s R-I n 11 '' I I � R•1 i i _ 3B U i 1� •'lf Et,l.t P R-11'.' D '—1 R�...\ I -•' II r- R- �.., ... R1 -- .. f R-III m� O 4 N cRtii�a -I Ei r\ ' {1 N Rill : X RB R 111 w ' yl-1 CSC/GB/ ~�R���,,• i YR- ..• i R 111 Rlr�a `S ^'1 -10-1 RI nR4111-•----- Lr� IL z.. R-II r-• •. - _ f . P r. �� • . / NB � V ✓.,.. • t�I°, f�,.iR l �� � 1 jr� I � ' ,' 1. ^r,Ftl ���+..1 .: ;1� • � -+ LB R-III LB ,'� c $-I' :.!'. CSC ;.,L _ -moi:! - I• S1':' — ' DLB /R-I P AL Iu°i R-I R' R-IF' (/ R II S h1j: a•f- K - tin0 - RJ N -II -''• R-II .A ! APPLE VALLEY r' p-. t k C-`'a � ROSEMOUN..^ •' _ ) . TENrA-;,- GB 140 _._ ^ ^ *LOST SPUR r' ? COUNTRY g CLUB f LBRB -- '-__..._ . �._y.. - CENTe NO 11 uiJl ; uu. — VA EY HIGH ;'VIEN/ .. R7 _ D RRtS CO TRY PAF L i" .n a Q ,R_1 / d. ,;� e / R-ij HOh( �- TR EFFLE ACRES YEHNDL -1 R-1 TV i 6E L IQAl �:�%�„- I sP cn 4 A OPP iN 1H` AI IOME 1 - PD 74-0 3 R R-4 R-3 PFS = J y PF AE, R-4 R_4 o- R-3 : s t-1 R �� ( R��JQL - R_ ADDITION R-4 ONS NS R-4 GB i RIDGE r..;_.. A N B A ., R-4 NB A /0�} Gf YANKFF 83 3kC'R-4 _ - _ qOE RB - �— I I 0 0 LONE OAK HEIGHTS - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing regarding the application of Midwestern Associates - Orrin Aune for preliminary plat approval of Lone Oak Heights consisting of 14.09 acres and containing 125 dwelling units was convened by Chairman Chuck Hall. The property is zoned R-3 and R-4 with planned development overlay on the entire parcel. The Land Use Guide designates 14 acre parcels as R-3 land use with a density of 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre. The proposal includes 10.1 dwelling units per acre. The public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission on September 22, 1981 to consider a preliminary plat for Lone Oak Heights, and the APC recommended approval, subject to conditions. The Council considered the application at several meetings and denied the application at its January 19, 1982 meeting for several reasons. Mr. Jack Clinton, attorney, Mr. Aune, and also Ron Swanson and Steve Harvey of Valley Engineering Co, were present. Mr. Clinton reviewed the background and also reviewed the reasons for denial and the changes being made in the present application. 72 condominium units are proposed and 53 townhouse units. He noted the density had been decreased, there were no 3 -bedroom units in the condominium proposal, the roadway had been redesigned to move Shields Lane to the east, an NSP easement and gas line will be moved to accommodate the changes in road allignment and relocation of one condominium building and this reallignment will be done at the developer's expense. It is proposed that there be 2.5 parking spaces per unit. He noted there would be buffering provided adjacent to the Timberline Addition by the school and the park and that the developer will comply with all of the conditions recommended by the staff. He noted further that no variances will be required and that the proposal complies with the zoning. Ron Swanson made a presentation concerning the road revisions and stated there would be some underground parking rather than above -ground garages. The prices will be from $40,000.00 to $60,000.00 per unit. A representative of the developer was also present and discussed financing and the buyer's qualifications for purchase of the units. All units are intended for sale. Jim Woods, President of the Timberline Association was present and objected to the density in the project, due to the high density in Section 9. In the townhouse area the private streets were not deducted to arrive at densities and further Mr. Bohne stated that the density in the townhouses are at a maximum without deducting private streets. Mr. Bohne was also concerned about traffic from the Univac complex. Staff suggested no left turn from Towerview to Shields Lane during the afternoon rush hours. Other traffic controls would also be considered. Mr. Woods again requested the Planning Commission and the Council consider down -zoning the property below the R-3 and R-4 uses. He stated that the area has changed greatly and the parcel is an island in the middle of an essentially residential area. Krob moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following: 1. If the site plan is approved, the gas main shall be relocated as to not interfere with any of the proposed buildings and also to the satisfaction of the Northern States Power Company. 2. The plat shall be subject to all easements as required by City staff. 3. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City staff. /OS 0 0 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by City staff and an adequate landscape bond shall be submitted with each final plat and not re- leased until one year after the landscaping has been completed for each plat. 5. The developer shall provide two tot lots within the development for the proposed pre-schoolers as approved by the City. 6. The developer at its cost shall construct a trail from Pilot Knob Road to Pilot Knob School between the condominium and townhouse development. 7. The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the Homeowner's Association Articles, Bylaws and Restrictions for City review. 8. A development agreement and planned development agreement shall be approved prior to the final plat application. 9. The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission since the plat abuts two County roads. 10. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public rights-of-way and along the west boundary line. In addition, drainage and utility easements incorporating the internal utilities required to service this development shall be dedicated as a part of the final plat. 11. The internal private road shall be constructed to a 28 foot minimum width with concrete curb and gutter to City approved plans and specifications. 12. Previously deferred trunk area water assessments and lateral benefit from trunk water main shall be assumed by this development as a condition of final plat approval. 13. A thirty foot half right -of- way shall be dedicated for Towerview Road. 14. Towerview Road shall be ordered for improvement prior to final plat approval and the cost shall be assessed against the benefitted property. 15. That City shall impose restrictions to cut down excessive through traffic on Shields Lane. Those in favor were Hall, Turnham, Wilkins, Wold, Bohne, Kroh and McCrea. !d( 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON RIDGE 3RD ADDITION E. Zachman Homes, Inc., Steve Ryan, for Preliminary Plat, Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition, consisting of S single family lots, 28 single family cluster lots and 8 twin home lots -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at the March 23, 1982 meeting to consider a preliminary plat for Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addi- tion consisting of S single family lots, 28 single family cluster lots and 9 twin home lots. Action was taken by the APC to recom- mend approval to the City Council subject to certain conditions. Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition is a part of the second phase of the Cinnamon Ridge Planned Development. The proposed plat is consis- tent with the planned development with the exception that some of the 8 unit condos have been replaced with twin homes or townhome- two family units. For a copy of the City Planner's report, refer to pages IOq, through Ja 5 . For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of those se minutes found on pages 1,L& through 12.1 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: preliminary plat of Cinnamon Ridge 3rd for approval by the APC. 107 To approve or deny the Addition as recommended 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN i SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNAMON RID(1E 3RD ADDITION APPLICANT: ZACHMAN HOMES - STEVE RYAN LOCATION: OUTLOT B, CINNAMON RID(M 1ST ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 23, 1982 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 17, 1982 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a preliminary plat, Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition, consisting of 5 single family lots, 28 single family cluster lots and 9 twin home lots. LAND USE: Presently the parcel is zoned PD (Planned Development) and has an over- all density of 600 dwelling units in the 72 acres. It was determined when the PD was approved in August of 1981 that the land use was in conformance with Eagan's Corprehensive Guide Plan. C0N➢v1ENTS: As stated in the agenda, the applicant has submitted an application re- questing preliminary plat approval, Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition, consisting of 5 single family lots, 28 single family cluster lots and 9 twin home lots located in part of Outlot B, Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition. There has been a miscom unication between the developer and staff, and the devel- oper is revesting besides the dwelling units listed above that also there be in- cluded 18 twin home lots and 72 townhcme or oondominiiun units. Since there was a mise mnunication, staff had only advertised 42 dwelling units, and we are in the process of checking with the City Attorney to see if we can include the 18 addi- tional twin hone lots and the 72 condominium units. If this cannot be done, we will then continue the second portion of the plat until the April APC meeting. The staff report and information supplied by the developer includes the total amount of units and not only the phase that has been advertised. In reviewing the information submitted, the applicant has been very thorough in providing accurate information in regard to the Cinnamon Ridge development pro- posal. As stated in this report, the changes which have occurred are the reduc- tion of one single family lot, adjusting lot lines on the single family cluster lots and changing the mix of condominium units and toanhome units. The original planned development had listed these 16'single family lots, 42 single family clus- ter lots, 50 twin home lots and 192 condominium units. The revised plan will have 15 single family lots, 42 single family cluster, 86 twin home lots and 136 condominium units. NOTE: As you can see, the change from the PD is a net reduction of 21 dwelling units and the reduction falls by reducing the condo units by 56 dwelling units and increasing the twin hole units by 36. W 0 CITY OF EAGAN CINNAMON RIDGE 3RD ADDITION MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE TWO 0 The applicant is proposing to construct Slater's Road and Cinnamon Ridge Trail to make a loop street with the Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition. The Metcalf Drive and Slater's Road to Cliff Road will be constructed with the 3rd phase, or the plat- ting of Outlot A which would be the 72 condaninium units on the west side of Cin- namon Ridge Trail. Therefore, Metcalf Drive will not be constructed with this 3rd Addition. Please refer to the memorandum prepared by Steve Ryan of Zachman Homes for the detailed information regarding Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition. Staff has reviewed the information submitted and all of the data is accurate in their calculation. The only additional information staff can provide are the conditions for the 3rd Addition. These are: 1) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City staff prior to any construction on the proposed site. 2) No variances shall be granted for setbacks on the single family, duplex or cluster home development unless it relates to topographic conditions. 3) A development agreement shall be prepared and approved by the City of Eagan prior to the construction of this phase. 4) The developer shall provide garages for all of the single family cluster units. The developer shall also meet the specifications of the City Engi- neer for the private drives for the cluster units. 5) All applicable ordinances in the City shall be complied with. 6) The Third Addition of the planned development shall be subject to the revised park dedication. DCR/jach ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS 7) A 10' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all Public right-of-ways and adjacent to private property. 8) A storm sewer system complete with temporary detention'basins shall be constructed as a condition of this phased development. 9) The northern loop of Slater's Road and Cinnamon Trail shall be oonstruc- ted as a part of this 3rd Addition.to provide for through -traffic move- ment. TAC/jach loct • 0 TO: THE ADVISORY PIANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKIE, CITY PLANNER FROM: THOMAS A. CDLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 18, 1982 RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - CINNNVE Q RIDGE 3RD ADDITION - ZACHMAN The Public Works Department has the following comments for consideration of the above -referenced proposed plat: UTILITIES Sanitary sewer and water main facilities were provided to the general site as a part of Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition under Project 346. These utili- ties will be extended to serve this proposed 3rd Addition. STREETS With this proposed 3rd Addition, the Slater's Road/Cinnamon Ridge Trail northern loop will have to be completed as a part of this Addition to pro- vide through -traffic movement. As a condition of the preliminary plat ap- proval, it was stated that the Metcalf Drive connection to River Hills 9th Subdivision must be constructed as a part of the 3rd phase development along with the construction of Slater's Road to its intersection with Cliff Road. Although this preliminary plat is the 3rd Addition, it is only the second phase of their development and as such, the Metcalf Drive connection will not be a condition of this 3rd Addition preliminary plat approval. n••�� a �••�ra The general drainage for this 3rd Addition is towards the north into the ponding area within the NSP easement along the northern boundary. This pond presently has a gravity storm sewer outlet to the east under the Cedar Avenue Freeway. A detention ponding area will be provided in the northwest corner of this plat in conformance with the approved grading plan and exca- vation permit issued with the 1st Addition. ASSESSMENTS Trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer have been previously assessed against this property. The only future assessments an- ticipated with this 3rd Addition would be those directly related with the extension of the laterals necessary to service this 2nd phase. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -MY Typical drainage and utility easements to incorporate the construction and extension of public utilities shall be provided as determined by the City staff. A 60' right-of-way for the Metcalf Drive connection shall be dedi- cated as a condition of this plat. I will be available to discuss in further detail any aspect pertaining to this report at the Planning Commission of March 23, 1982. TAC/jack, Ito March 10, 1982 Eagan City Council Eagan Planning Commission 3795 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, Mn. 55122 Dear City Officals: In looking toward the 1982 construction season, we see the slight possi- bility of a brightened economy and accordingly, an improved rate of housing sales and construction. As you may recall, the overall plan and first phase plat of Cinnamon Ridge was approved late last summer, forcing grading and utility construction into early winter. While we began marketing in late November 1981, our efforts were handicapped by the absence of a finished model home center, which is just now receiving its finishing touches. Despite the ill-fated timing of the first phase however, we find that our sales effort has been effective and the project appears destined for success. Consequently, we are now requesting your consideration of the second phase of Cinnamon Ridge, which involves development of the most northerly portion of the 72 acre Cinnamon Ridge project. Our proposal for this phase is fully consistant with the initial overal PUD approval, though it contains some minor modifications to density (reduced) and housing type (less condominium), both of which changes we anticipate being viewed positively, particularly by our surrounding neigh- bors. The specifics of our proposal are contained in the attached report. Respectfully; ZACHMAN HOMES, C. re T. Ryan Director of SubidTions STR:cjc 112- 7760 MITCHELL ROAD, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 (612) 937.9520 0 0 PROPOSED PLAN - CINNAMON RIDGE 3rd ADDITION The area which comprises the proposed Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition is the north - end of Cinnamon Ridge project, legally described as Outlot B Cinnamon Ridge. (See Exhibit A). This same area encompasses approximately 31 acres,and as originall; indicated, includes both the second and third phases of the overall project (see Exhibit B). We are requesting preliminary plat approval for the entire northern area at this time, since our original project approval involved runstrurting the balance of the loop road connection during phase 2 and as such we will be dedicating that loop road with the next final plat. In the following paragraphs I will attempt to both cover the specifics of our current proposal as well as provide a comparison with our previous PUD approval. To assist in defining the major topics in the proposal, I have divided the discussion into the two areas of land use and transportation. LAND USE In reviewing the revised land use plan, (See Exhibit C) you may recall that the general placement pattern of the various land uses and housing types have changed very little. More specifically, the original plan indicated traditional single family lots adjacent to the Burnsville border (West edge) to smooth the transition from the existing single family homes in River Hills 10th Addn. This general pattern is re- tained, though, in the redesign, we have dropped one of the originally proposed lots. it should be noted that the lot which was dropped was not located abutting the border, and thus, the change does not reduce the amount border transition that previously existed. The single family cluster homes previusl.y propsed for the northwestern area of the plat remain unchanged, though their location was adjusted slightly to accomo date a'change in the location of the NSP highline easement. On the eastern side of the plat, 84 units of eight unit building condominiums were originally proposed. This is the specific area which was originally identified as the third phase of the overall project. The revisions in this area involve a continuation of the present style of condominiums being constructed in the first phase; a reorientation of the buildings, such that their exposure to the Cedar Freeway is minimized and they are pulled further away from our nothern border; and a reduction of twelve units. In the original plan the balance (after lst phase development) of the property located inside of the loop was identified as part of the second phase. The land uses in this area were indicated as eighteen units of twin homes, forty units of Condominium and approximately 21 acres of park. There are two modifications included in our current proposal regarding this area which need further discussion. First the forty units of condominiums have been deleted and replaced by thirty-six units of private association style townhomes. This change stems from our marketing experiences in Cinnamon Ridge thus far. Specifically, we have found extremely positive reaction to our (single family) cluster concept, due primarily to the fact that the concept matches housing type and lifestyle preferences at an affordable price. At the same time, we are finding that many buyers have a preference for attached housing with the private association created lifestyle, but are not satisfied with accepting condominium housing in order to find the right price. In response to this marketing dilemma, we have found that a very pos- itive reaction exists towards two family attached housing constructed in a townhouse - like pattern, on a private street systme, with a Homeowners Association. This concept is viewed with enthusiasm since it provides the buyer with all of tho perceived of single neighbor attached housing and managed property maintenance, and does so, at a price which is more affordable than the traditional twin home. 113 PROPOSED PLAN - CIWION RIDGE 3rd ADDITION • Pg. 2 As a product of the townhome/condo revision, discussed above, the configuration of the park was changed from triangular to more rectangular. The park area,as now presented, is approximately 2.5 acres and includes larger entrance points along the public street. A final point regarding the revised design of the park, is that a through access (north to south) was incorporated in response to suggestions made by the park commission nearly one year ago. It is our impression that the the through access is superior to the previously approved configuration, in that it provides greater direct access to the northern portion of the development. A summary tabulation of land use specifics and changes is listed below. LAND USE BREAKDOWN COMPARISON LandUse/Housing Type Original Plan/Units Revised Plan/Units Single Family 6 5 Single Family Cluster 28 .. 28 Twin home 18 18 Condominium 124 72 Townhome 0 36 TOTAL 176 159 REVISED PLAN DETAIL BREAKDOWNS Gross acreage: Gross density: Density net of park: Density net of Park & Public St Density net of Park, Public street and Private Drives: Net Acreage & Building Coverage by Housing Type: 1. Single Family 2. Single Family Cluster 3. Twin homes 4. Townhome 5. Condo 31.12A 5.11 DU/A 6.94 DU/A 7.94 DU/A 8.63 DU/A 1.51 A - 9.98 5.06 A - 15.23% 2.15 A - 19.058 4.17 A - 208 7.23 A - 17.48 115 PROPOSED PLAN - CINNA14ORIDGE 3rd ADDITION • Pg. 3 TRANSPORTATION Two topics exist within the general discussion of transportation: nature of road system & scheduling of construction (phasing). The nature of the road system, consistant with past approval; is a system comprised of standard Public roads and private driveways associated with the single family clusters, condominiums and now, the townhome revision. You will recall that as the townhome area is a replacement for a previously approved condominium area , there is no additional private driveways, but rather simply a change of driveway alignment. Regarding construction scheduling, as mentioned earlier, all of the public road with the exception of the Metcalf connection road would be constructed with the second phase. The final plat, when presented for phase 2, will include all of the single family, twin homes, park, single family clusters, townhome area, and right of way for the public street loop connection, leaving only the condo area (including the Metcalf connection road) as an Outlot to be final platted as the third phase in the future. As previously agreed, at such time as we final plat the third phase, we must dedicate the right of way for both Metcalf and the connection of Slater Road at Cliff through the South east corner of the overall property. This arrangement was originally agreed to since the additional road was not critical until such time as the condominiums in the third phase were constructed and because the construction of the second access point on Cliff simultaneous with the Metcalf connection would remove any incentive (remote as it might be) to access the site through River Hills 9th Addition to the north. Traffic generation for phase 2 is estimated to be distributed as follows: Single family 5 units = 50 trips per day Single family cluster 28 units = 224 " Twin homes 18 units = 126 " Townhomes 36 units = 252 " " " 87 Units = 652 trips per day Peak hour trips = 65 trips To assist in clarifing the previously discussed topics,, exhibits illustrating the preliminary plat, phasing, grading and utilities are included on the following pages. A final note regarding the exhibits concerns the grading and utilities plans in that both are essentially identical to the original plans due to the minor nature of revisions. 116 vv "1", Ir.roY- 1 . OUTLOT 8 OR NO 1 TJUr NO 001ANE I �• I .1 n • 6 I TJ4/T 00 OO LANA • ' ti .1/� �•I•If �1�ru 111 •/ . � ,�. + .; 1 1 1! ruo •rv'u'►- � J 1' II .ry J OUTL ... �2 41• _I: 1 � � I li�i` jlii.��f� .1 �•,l•AV •,., :, j �' 6I i ' • 11 1 , �1 t T [� '!r' ,� 1 1 '•f yY�l r•�-i.�i•-� I ; I ~rl�~ � !I ,4-= 1 ; , \ I p , 411 IA uYli•Y • 1 1 ,. 4 . 0 v' T C • .wo t 1 �ON.11 NYIY11� 1 -f • ' 1 • CARTIER AYE. elf '41 CHMAN HOMES INC.INCHOMES INC. CINNAMON RIDGE EACAN, MINNESOTA F� Fikik%. PL-AT- 1� F-of"ITT c�►r A: Op' +```" 00 T.N.11 NO OD LANL . 'T.10T !0 00 EANe � 1 CARTIER AYR. 01!*%4 f�O, . Ot 1 OR Yt' i • • ZACHMAN HOMES INC. CINNAMON RIDGE :1. %�troU2e� -PHASING PLAN EAGAN• MINNESOTA E/: • _ TJI.77 BG to LANs j t-;: •••� xi,:•� . OW R.� MULTIFAMILY r g `\ t\\'t (. J \\\. ; - . . .. ,,, -• Iffy 71, = ! �'_'_' \ / � \ ` ;'\ I I�" � '\ Ifi 1111I��r �J .•�: - . � 1�J / i, J'f� !1 I I' 1 Ijl 1.%I 1 ) \MI. �� • 11: n .� IO• •,• a f .` � li'•I Il'�R-9•Lul}TIFALL)F�J;i.. ; �. .`• \ ✓•�^\ —�,�.\ (�.• \': � III, ��II,1.1 l I) ' PARK � �pN" � • • .�. '\�•.`-�� '�•' �1 "_ : �: .- � �' � � ! � - % �. �I Q \ _�^• f 61 SLEFAMILY •^I -�I ! I I �,.�- • PAR l - CLU ER HOMES • SIN Gt, LF- ILY � • � ` I \� • WG r I OM e 1 3'O .. ... • -il[ CARTIER AVL • • 944t`44,p+ ' � � �ci ^ I v •r ,r P ZACHMAN HOMES INC. CINNAMON RIDGE EAGAK YWNESOTA REVISED LAND USE PLAN • L 25XHIe;,ITIle- " GAJ ,' • ,�'! , • li,` •!: -.� � \ � - • •—ii ••-JJYF�'; ,��� ':. CY,IAYCa_III]CC TMC( Y, it is AU, �c!--�+'uI�.. to I,? -.:!i• :.!1.!�'4�'t4ii,e'-J,�..::r.`,�C�?.��J, i1yJz.� ;r< •SNR 1,110 `~ � �� ,+ I 3 0. � i.,.l . �,ri, I r �' Aq�•. :.':haae� R r Ir It W1. CARTIER AVE. ' - ... -. .moi i' �. � ��� i.• / ,�-=--..-.-� CINNAMON RIDGE THIRD ADDITIONZACHMAN HOMES INC. EADAN. MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY PLAT �`LlJr�IT `tn►! ' '(PAS AK I or or or ■ ral'tra I • rraor W".— or or or ■ ral'tra 1 / ... . .•�.l l➢e110 tW.li �1•.E•f;:-•.w.-.Q•.n•. �\�lr �C""r.' .. _ �__. .. ..�_ a\�:a-t-=�,t- -�_ 1I::=v=' .'_! , 'Dory-:'���': �` _. - ,"� .' r i o f'�;..�...-•-••-. � 1 `i`��_� Fi+^: i� . cnauuox, ioat'riu / /.. ,' '� K"yty\fit. �\ J 4%�� `11 Y�It �� •i -'.r 1` ��,v � ;1 ,. %••_— � I _ � 11/ �.11ll 1y .J 11 1 19 'a7�,� .• / / � l M•� _ P' �: " f ' It (C It ,..if�� t •� \�\'Y,,"i� 1 111 � ' i . `�~ \ f �!� ice^ • _r I t� / . I :+.c;�4 `t;•+ 'C� �^-� `a`�+` i >< ` :moi;' \ .`� / 1 r Ell • / 1'' \^. !'0 �t,v o\I� \ �X L'•;--'C:� // �. / 1 � �~.0/ ii / /.,, sl . ,.\:'•.`u`!1 •BTa%;. ..ai u2C'1+•,'►.RR �\ , t `\ M'1 \���••1 t/ / yl ., ��/'yn�i'7 moa1a•orerE r j� i /� I`!\�S �•`• •.l •I�( •`� •!�.�.r\ �/�%! J •� I mo.]• �oe 1 4\� :• 1R� S•.�5 •:., _ •� 1 / , / r ej"� 'a's�tlr°i t4'% , a' I / I w rt !cv' haatgxalr tl �1. ioT W. ' ,� •I o. I I � � py, ,e I y/ C.RTIER AVL , oft \%7 / • Y � � I • / \ .., rl ZACHMAN HOMES INC.iF CINNAMON RIDGE THRO ADD=N FAGAN, MINNESOTA ,, • PRELIMINARY PLAT'' .Ct[1J1f21-too 15PC iI tG*�f Op V� N N 0 ' ' `�''�y'•�; /•' /kgs°�/�� `��4 '� I I I• I I '��Q �� / ~:.• + � '. `\1 .� � f .i Ali r r . � . �.: • 19 ZACHMAN HOMES'INC. CINNAMON RIDGE �A.tq=N GRADING TrAN. . . CINNAMON WNNEWTA, rN 141 isIor„ 1::„ �� �• Ipinuuil ! /••r'%r •! ! - �ti _ � SSSS 1 1 :1'1'11,, '\,fY' % ,a(� \ %{• �/r:.:. i ?.,I�\� \ \ �1 ��� '\ I • r �:, ; . ���,-� "''ter—��'�z�.._ 1� 1., ��/ � � ;•�/—'_ :i' ,,, � 1 � � �1 �.�, i , i, �, •— 777 �e.,.tt I VV . •• .� � 1 ,�\ .L� \, ,,. ",,,��./ liJ,/i/f I�,��•`\\ II� •� �11� _Iv •� �t111-�iJ;'L' \. I f Ji 1 1 Y "yr�:�:a>/./,EfcfYx".v_ '._; 1�.L. � � ..L1J:,r-!/`•�r i� � � ,. • r( Date qta '• • _ "'�•��.�// �� �'`!/T ��Ar.',:;11 iir,�,�1�"`r \� �,(r�).1 ISI f ' Oe L� „ Aur r'_ .. .!r .:.1 „ •. .. _; ' u ' i I .i %_ ; - •.• •..CARTIER AVL •.. 4,0 ZACHMAN HOMES INC. CINNAMON RIDGE euro ADOm N UTILITIES PIAN EADAN. MINNESOTA Y1/u1 C6110 l�� 11 MENDOTA ,',NTS. \ 1 ------------ GE C• �� kM / -% � - �_, GOLF i 'aur., j:-7 c l- •'i • _..i / �4• ;•.�:: •r Ind -- -Intl • 2i' f�_ _ �e F 1 - of .LB ii... OF /f ©R-0 RIII ° s Ind. 4l Vag ..YL•ar•.4 .:w, wl '� - v,.. RI \ Lira•a Ind _ R-III1' f m ' wr ♦...:i, oaf... Ij', � A ..I�. � �:::k._ -- ~• ' Indy'-- y NB 1 LB -1 R -9I. .- C RII ? .v,> R-II'rM CSC D c R-19 _ .W.r, •as. �Q, LEV -R-II R-1: P / R14 a.li"RII 'P .. 1 ; g ul>r ` ate. Crir R I RII Q Vis- I Ind .. ix� spa r X , I HALL _. R- i V CSC P, ,.�: >- .,-r R•t- � R111 rr HS ,1 f li �' C ai 9i .c '�•+y-,.Y. ,.R -II `•� LJ� :41 -R10 GB 1 e�:(•f� rt�'���I P ..© 'I R / r Le, -• II R R -III - SLB � r - M I .- / p LB N _"ti;5�3?�ia. .-_� E; 14�RII�I . `. RB .,y : R -III R IIS' RIII• -R ��.•d - im ay'� � RIII CSC/GB/LB ;rte � "s LfJ• JmFa P Ral - ✓`'• •RII R -II �n� J ,s. RII r; ""I ` ,7 A .ci : R-11 .t t� =+ .qi s T j e.,.. �( --1'S+,a•. ' NB '• as t\%� I 1'L:fwiF�11 - +r •'�•R•I`,� P-1 '' ..,,• . CSC L\�,n, �� I••I I .� .,.. / RBLB -' P l� i -I si Ic y r O R -I e n�I'1?N P P RII N \�{! A� FAAA �$ t._' R -II 1 a r Q P l'" R �! �! APPLE :1 VALLEY r-_ B"4, it .,-`> ROSEMOUNr LI ADD (�((l1r� HL LI 9 / i CSC 4 :v µP R-4 ,v CSC PF A R-4 ti A CCGG )WT4xi of Aft N iEEN CB CB i PF _. r JUN10'? !NB , n Q- PF o NB/'^��. HIGH moqi p 8 B-2] _- IOO]l n,, I. e ..1111T1 �T�j11 (L- SCHOOL W t I +, ! oJ 1 _ - r PK MART ri.'u:�(;''��� I 'v � `� it I CSC „r'A U 11J L NB )l r' �I RIVER RB 1 LI ADD (�((l1r� HL LI 9 / i CSC 4 :v µP R-4 ,v CSC PF A R-4 ti A CCGG )WT4xi of Aft N iEEN CB CB i PF _. r JUN10'? !NB , n Q- PF o NB/'^��. HIGH moqi p 8 B-2] _- IOO]l n,, I. e ..1111T1 �T�j11 (L- SCHOOL W t I +, ! oJ 1 _ - r PK MART ri.'u:�(;''��� I 'v � `� it I CSC „r'A U 11J L NB )l r' �I RIVER RB 0 0 CINNAMON RIDGE 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The hearing concerning the application of Zachman Homes for preliminary plat approval of Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition on Outlot B, Cinnamon Ridge 1st Addition was convened. The project would include 5 single-family lots, 28 single-family cluster lots, and 9 twin -home lots. The Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition would be in the Cinnamon Ridge Planned Development and the 3rd Addi- tion would consist of 15 single-family lots, 42 single-family clusters, 86 twin -home lots, and 136 condominium units. Mr. Steve Ryan was present and he stated that the 3rd Addition would cover the entire north end of the project. The proposal is not to build Metcalf Drive at the present time and further, that there is a net reduction in the number of units in the proposal from the original planned development, with a net reduction of 21 dwelling units. Berming will be included along the Cedar freeway and utilities will be looped through the Phase 2 project. Phase 3 will remain as an outlot at the present time. In addition, the developer will place some improvements in the park areas. There were a number of questions from interested persons present in the audience. There was also a question from Mr. Bohne as to maintenance of the twin -homes and Mr. Ryan stated that there would be party wall restric- tions, which will be filed and also be reviewed by the City. Planning Commis- sion members commended the developer in changing the plans to meet the demands of the consumer, which provide for a larger number of town homes. One owner present from the Zachman addition east of Cedar Avenue was concerned about faulty construction in some of the homes built by Zachman. Krob moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. That 18 additional town home lots be included in the project. 2. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be approved by the City staff prior to any construction on the proposed site. 3. No variances shall be granted for setbacks on the single family, duplex or cluster home development unless it relates to topographic condi- tions. 4. A development agreement shall be prepared and approved by the City of Eagan prior to the construction of this phase. 5. The developer shall provide garages for all of the single family cluster units. The developer shall also meet the specifications of the City Engineer for the private drives for the cluster units. 6. All applicable ordinances in the City shall be complied with. 7. The 3rd Addition of the planned development shall be subject to the revised park dedication. Iz6 0 0 8. A 10 foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public rights-of-way and adjacent to private property. 9. A storm sewer system complete with temporary retention basins shall be constructed as a condition of this phased development. 10. The northern loop of Slater's Road and Cinnamon Trail shall be constructed as a part of this 3rd Addition to provide for through -traffic movement. All voted yes. /a7 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty -One IRB FINANCING REQUEST - DIAMOND LAKE INC. F. Diamond Lake, Inc., Request for Public Hearing to Consider I. R. Financing in the Amount of $750,000 -- A new application has been submitted to the City of Eagan, again requesting industrial revenue bond financing for equipment and trade fixtures for the proposed new Sullivan store located in the Pilot Knob Shopping Center. A similar request was submitted before the City Council and was denied. The motion of the December 1, 1981 meeting reads as follows, " Egan then moved, based upon the reasons above described and the fact that a precedent would be set by the Council on authorizing financing for equipment only, to deny the request for industrial revenue financing. Parranto seconded the motion and all voted in favor." In order for this item to be reconsidered by the City Council, a member of the City Council on the prevailing motions side must make a motion to reconsider. Apparently, anyone can second that motion. Those City Councilmembers on the prevailing side are Mayor Blomquist and Councilmembers Egan and Smith. City Councilmember Wachter was not present for that part of the City Council meeting on December 1; City Councilmember Thomas was not serving on the City Council and former City Councilmember Parranto does not currently serve on the City Council. The City Administra- tor has received the application and full documentation supporting the application which are in the customary booklet form. If a public hearing is set for the May 18, 1982 City Council meeting, the support information will be presented in the City Council packet at that time. Enclosed on pages )a q through 1;e is a copy of a letter from Mr. Bob Levy, egl ar—counsel for iamond Lake, Inc., and also on pages 111 through is a copy of the minutes from the December 3-,-= City CounciImeeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To move or not move to reconsider, and if a motion is approved to reconsider, a public hearing would be set for May 18, 1982 to consider the industrial revenue financing for Diamond Lake, Inc. 11a% 0 LAW OFFICES • ESTES PARSINEN S, LEVY A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 700 PILLSBURY CENTER 200 SOUTH SIXTH STREET JOHN O. PARSINEN R. G. ESTES MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS402 ROBERT A. LEVY ERIC B. SCHULTZ TELEPHONE JACK A. ROSBERG LEON I.STEINSERG 16121 333-2111 April 14, 1982 City of Eagan, Minnesota 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Attn.: Tom Hedges, City Manager RE: Diamond Lake, Inc. - IRB Application Dear Tom: Enclosed please find an IRB application for Diamond Lake regarding equipment and trade fixture financing for its proposed new store to be located in the Pilot Knob Shopping Center. As you are aware, this application is a re -submission of the application filed with the City in the Fall of 1981. It is our belief that the City Council may have voted down the earlier application based upon a misunderstanding re- garding certain facts relative to the application of bond proceeds. At the time of the earlier application, it was our understanding that the City had not previously approved IRB financing for equipment and trade fixtures and that the City Council had certain reservations about the useful life of the equipment and the amount of equity that Diamond Lake would be investing. We were requested to prepare a list of the equipment to be financed and present that at the time of the earlier public hearing. The list which was prepared was an all inclusive list of all items of equipment and trade fixtures which would be used in the store. It was not intended as a specific list of just those items to be financed out of bond proceeds. We prepared it on an all inclusive basis to show the City Council that Diamond Lake would be spending significant sums /29 ESTES PARSINEN & LEVY • City of Eagan, Minnesota Page Two April 14, 1982 of money out of its own pocket in order to fixture the store in excess of that which would be paid out of bond proceeds. As a practical matter of underwriting, the bond purchaser will require a security interest in all items of equipment whether paid for out of bond proceeds or with equity monies, in order to insure that it have a full complement of equipment for store operation if there should ever be a default on the loan. It was our feeling that the Council focused too much on some of the specific smaller shorter life items of equipment as being a reason not to approve the financing. Diamond Lake is not asking the City to approve financing of mops and buckets, as was suggested at the council meeting in December, but merely was showing all items on the list for the purpose of clarifying to the council that it would be investing significant equity monies. The normal industry custom for financing of equipment and trade fixtures for supermarkets is to finance 100% of the equipment. As you will note from that list, it is Diamond Lake's expectation that it will be spending significant sums out of pocket in excess of the financed amount. In addition, it is anticipated that the cost of initial shelf inventory will be approximately $500,000 which must be paid by Diamond Lake up front without financing. If the City Council was misled by that all inclusive list, we feel that is unfortunate, since that list was only an attempt to document the equity investment. It is our hope that the City Council will reconsider their Position based upon this clarification. Diamond Lake respectfully requests that the City waive its application fee and any fee for review by its financial consultant, considering that Diamond Lake has already paid such fees once. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly,yours, Robert A. Levy RAL/jcw 150 Council Minutes December 1, 1981 storm sewer system. Mr. Kenneth Ketchum, attorney representing property owners, had questions concerning the method of the appraisal and the method the City used in arriving at these assessments. He stated, that in his opinion, that the area being assessed is less than the total drainage district and it was noted that the reason is that because all the storm sewers were not installed at the same time. Numerous other property owners being affected by the assessments had questions of the council and many of them opposed the assessments that were being levied by the Council, in particular, the addi- tional assessment for the reassessment cost. Approximately 49 property owners submitted objections to the assessments in writing before or during the Council meeting and it was requested that the City acknowledge receipt of the objections from each of the property owners. It was noted that because of the large number of objections that were received that the Council could not hear all the objections at the time of the December 1 hearing and the City Attorney recommended that the Council adopt the assessment roll as to those parcels where objections were not submitted by December 1 and that the Council con- tinue the assessment hearing as to the remaining parcels where objections were submitted and received. Council members indicated that a letter will be sent to all of the objecting property owners as to the schedule of the continued hearing. After considerable discussion, Smith moved, Parranto seconded the motion to close the hearing and to adopt the reassessment roll as to all parcels where objections were not received by the City Council at the December 1, 1981 meeting based upon the Findings of Fact, and Conclusions, a copy of which is attached to these Minutes and made a part of these Minutes. All voted in favor. Eagan then moved, Smith seconded the motion to continue the reassessment hearing as to the parcels for which objections were submitted to the City Council on or before December 1, 1981 to be rescheduled to January 12, 1982 at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. It was stated to all persons present that they would then be given an opportunity to submit testimony and evidence concerning each of their respective parcels of property owned by them on January 12, 1982 or at such continued hearing if necessary, at a later time. All members voted in favor. DIAMOND LAKE, INC. - I. R. FINANCING The public hearing concerning the application of Diamond Lake, Inc, for Industrial Revenue financing in the amount of $750,000.00 for the acquisition of equipment and fixtures to be used in conjunction with the retail super- market in the proposed Pilot Knob Shopping Center was convened by Mayor Blomquist. Robert Levy, attorney for Diamond Lake, Inc. and Mr. John Sullivan, Jr. were present on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Levy stated that Richfield Bank and Trust Company has committed itself to finance the $750,000.00 and that the loan will be paid off prior to the expected useful life of the equipment. There were many questions from City Council members and members of the audience as to whether the Council should finance equipment and fixtures at all or in part. It was noted that this was the first example where a request for I. R. Financing has been submitted exclusively for fix- tures and equipment. There was questions as to whether this type financing is an inducement to new business and whether the approximately 90 new jobs which consist of only 30 full-time jobs, is a sufficient inducement for the issuance of the financing. It was noted there would be no increase in taxes and 4 131 Council Minutes December 1, 1981 Industrial Revenue Financing had already been authorized for the shopping center building itself. Councilman Smith suggested that the City Council ought to consider issuing financing for fixtures but not for equipment that has a short anticipated useful life. It was noted the total estimated cost of the fixtures is $871,000.00, including sales tax, engineering fees, etc. The attorney for the Pilot Knob Shopping Center was present and indicated the supermarket is critical for the financing for the entire center. After lengthy discussion, Smith moved to authorize up to $555,000.00 industrial revenue financing for heavy duty equipment, including fixtures, which include a life expectancy of at least ten years. There was no second and the motion died. Egan then moved, based upon the reasons above described and the fact that a precedent would be set by the Council in authorizing financing of the equipment only, to deny the request for industrial revenue financing. Parranto seconded the motion and all voted in favor. FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND USE HEARING The Mayor convened the proposed use hearing to consider suggestions as to the use of federal revenue sharing monies for calendar year 1982. The second hearing will be held on December 15 with the adoption of the 1982 general fund budget and simultaneously with the adoption of the 1982 general fund budget. Notice of the proposed use hearing has been published in the Dakota County Tribune and Mr. Hedges explained the history of federal revenue sharing and the possible cut-backs in federal revenue sharing in the future. Smith moved, Egan seconded the motion to close the hearing. All voted in favor. There were no objections at the time of the hearing. LONE OAK ROAD - SPEED LIMIT Mr. Hedges reviewed a letter that was submitted by Representative Carolyn Rodriguez, including a letter dated October 22, 1981 from a member of the Attorney General's staff regarding speed zoning in school zones and urban districts within municipal limits. There was concern about the speed limits on Lone Oak Road near Pilot Knob School and also on sections of Pilot Knob Road. School Zone limits can be established to be effective only when there are children in the area and urban district zoning limits would be established only if highways are at least within 100 feet apart for a distance of one- quarter mile. Karen Flood was present and asked that the City Council take action to attempt to reduce speed limits in those areas. Smith moved, Egan seconded the motion to direct the staff to commence a study to determine whether the City can comply on Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road under the Urban District provisions of the Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 169, and if so, that the staff prepare a Petition to the Minnesota Department of Transporta- tion to designate those stretches of Pilot Knob Road and Lone Oak Road as Urban District; further, Egan moved that in the event that the staff deter- mines that the sections do not qualify as Urban District to the Council, then request that Representative Rodriguez and Senator Howard Knutson submit special legislation during the 1982 Legislative Session to provide under M.S.A. 169.02, subd. 59, Urban District, that where structures in Eagan de- voted to business, industry or dwelling houses are situated at intervals of less than 300 feet for a distance of a quarter of a mile or more, be desig- nated an Urban District. Parranto seconded the motion, all voted yes. 5 13; Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty -Two COUNTRYSIDE VILLA - FINAL PLAT G. Final Plat for Countryside Villa -- The City has received an application for final plat consideration for Countryside Villa. A copy of the final plat is enclosed on page 13t for your informa- tion. All conditions placed on this plat at t e —time of preliminary plat have been fulfilled and/or guaranteed by way of an acceptable letter of credit. This final plat has been reviewed by all affected City departments and is now being recommended for formal approval by Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the final plat for Countryside Villa as Countryside Builders and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the necessary docu- ments for final plat. 133 w -P COUNTRYSIDE VILLA N 1J_J Y3RiY_n- 0 • Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty -Three JOINT CABLE COMMISSION UPDATE A. Joint Burnsville/Eagan Joint Cable Commission Update -- The next meeting of the Joint Cable Commission is scheduled for April 22, 1982 at 7:00 p.m. at the Burnsville City Hall. Since there has not been any meetings of the joint commission since the last City Council meeting, there is no report. CONTRACT 82-4 B. Contract 82-4, Approve Plans & Specifications/Order Advertisement for Bids (Twin View Manor 2nd Addition, et al, Streets) -- Contract 82-4 provides for the installation of streets in the following projects and subdivisions: Project 335B -- Twin View Manor Second Addition Project 340B -- Windcrest 2nd Addition Project 341B -- Windtree 2nd Addition Project 346B -- Cinnamon Ridge First Addition Public hearings for the above referenced projects were held on July 21 or August 4, 1981 and subquently ordered for installation for the Council. All final costs have been recorded and all neces- sary easements have been acquired. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the plans and specifications for Contract 82-4 (Twin View Manor 2nd Addition, et al, Streets) and order advertisement for bids with the bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, May 11, 1982. 13.8 0 0 Agenda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty -Four BRITTANY MANOR ASSESSMENT PETITION C. Brittany Manor Petition, Assessment Interest Vacation (Project 272B) -- Enclosed on page 139, is a copy of a petition that the City received from thirteen property owners within the Brittany Manor First Addition requesting special consideration by the City Council pertaining to the interest rate that was levied on the special assessment for the installation of streets. This hearing was held on June 16, 1981. All notices pertaining to this final assessment hearing were published in the legal newspaper and sent to the property owners of record informing them of the final assess- ment hearing date. Apparently, when these property owners purchased their lots from Tollefson Builders, Inc., it was with the under- standing that all assessments would be paid. Carl Tollefson placed an escrow to cover these street assessments with Dakota County Abstract Company. Both the City Administrator and Public Works Director have met with representatives of this neighborhood to discuss the issue. In addition, the Public Works Director has met with the representative of Dakota County Abstract Company to try to determine where any miscommunication could have occurred. A summary of the discussions indicates that the property owners, upon receipt of the notice of final assessment hearing, contacted Carl Tollefson's office to inform them of their concern pertaining to their agreement understanding of all assessments being paid. Mr. Tollefson's office informed these property owners that he had placed an escrow with Dakota County Abstract to cover these assess- ments and theat they would not be liable. At the time of the final assessment hearing, there were no objections presented and subse- quently the roll was approved and staff was authorized to certify the roll to Dakota County for collection. After that final assess- ment hearing, the City received only two payments for these assess- ments and subsequently certified the rest to the county for col- lection on the 1982 property tax statement. Apparently, Dakota County Abstract was never informed of the final assessment hearing and subsequently did not pay the assessments with the escrow established by Carl Tollefson. Therefore, these assessments were spread over a five year period against the individual properties with the first year's principal installment of $563.97 and the first year's interest on the unpaid balance amounting to $346.85 based on 8%. 134 0 %genda Information Memo April 16, 1982 Page Twenty -Five 0 In summary, Mr. Tollefson placed an escrow with the Dakota County Abstract for the payment of these assessments. Subsequently, he refuses to pay any interest associated with these assessments resul- ting from their non-payment due to the fact that he had previously placed an amount to cover their payment when levied by the City. Dakota County Abstract indicates that they were not aware that this final assessment had been levied in explanation as to why they did not release the escrow account to pay off these assess- ments. The home owners object to having the interest for non- payment placed against their property taxes due to the fact that their purchase agreement with Tollefson Builders, Inc., provided that they would not be responsible for these assessments. A research of the special assessment file indicates that three lots have paid off their street assessments in this subdivision subse- quent to the June 16, 1981 public hearing. It is interesting to note that on Lot 14, Block 2 (1611 Norwood Drive), Dakota County Abstract paid off the final street assessment in full without in- terest penalty within the thirty days of final assessment hearing. Based on that fact, the staff feels that Dakota County Abstract should have been aware of their obligation on the other lots and subsequently release the escrow account to pay off all the out- standing assessments. In addition, Dakota County Abstract continues to hold the escrow account in what staff presumes would be an in- terest bearing account. The staff would feel that Dakota County Abstract should contribute whatever interest they have earned on this escrow account towards the payment of the interest charged for these unpaid street assessments. In summary, staff feels that the City was not negligent in any manner in notification or levying of these assessments and that we would not recommend any special consideration being given to reduction or elimination of the interest payment associated with these unpaid assessments as requested by the petitioning property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the petition request by thirteen property owners in Brittany Manor First Addition to waive any interest penalties on the street assess- ments levied on June 16, 1981 as a part of Project 272B for streets in the Brittany Manor First Addition. s/Thomas L. Hedges City inistrator 137 (de- `6/Le e(45;Vep h,9f?tcvwher5•oI'� -Rr,-Ha.j Esai�cs c% herc-b y �P'f�l�ion tie aj-/) -Cvr 5a;d i nge!'cs! or) assOOPssmeAds. We wowl�i �ike -� so �� �� �au✓le; ane( Pres��,-f our P/ob/ewe r !'�� Recently, we the below sinned oromerty owners of P'• z*tar:} r_cciv_d Ln n»::nr:.r, • � � „_ :. __. _. ements due in 1982. „o-a•I _...,_ inc'_�.rr..'e� =: _:: --c ;:. .-- .ssneYt ( street and er 272 1 of $563, p- arc raer.=,. charge of $346. 85. n_'.yyF•{: �'-�e_• i. :_ ., - .fai.r 1YI that none. tdile date _i EVIGlata payments. Therefore we reqs -rest that the i.nterest, charge be removed oend:rtr rlo'tificaticn by the c:.'t.y to the below signed property owners and that we are g;.ver, an appropriate period of time to arrange for payment of said assessment without interest charge. -------------------- M+•. and Mrs. Rrrless Mr, and Mrs. Fedde 1652 Norwbnd Dr. 1623 Nnrwood Dr. 1615 Norwood Dr. Mr. and Mrs. Rudolph 1644 Norwood Ct. Mr. and Mrs. Widsterl 138 592 Norwood Cir. _ Mr. arl?Mrs. Carter ^' 'Norwood Cir. Mr. and, Mrs. Gallus 1F.,,?!'. Norwood Dr. : .43 Norwood Dr. and Mrs. Roberts 1635 Norwood ''.r. arld Mrs. Schneider 'FS -I Norwood Dr. •:,rwond Cir. 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: .CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 16, 1982 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE Protective Inspection Monthly Report Enclosed on page A40 is a copy of the March 1982 Protective In- spection monthly report. Comprehensive Plan Density Calculations Enclosed on pages /`�I through /q -Z is a copy of a memorandum prepared by theitE y PTanner whic a dresses the Comprehensive Plan density calculations. There was discussion at the last City Council meeting regarding interpretation of the Comprehensive Guide Plan as either net or gross when determining units per acre for purposes of development applications. Early Warning Procedures Enclosed on page /4 3 is a copy of an early warning procedures memo prepared by i� viT—Defense Director Reid. This memorandum is informative. City Administrator 139 PROTE_CTIVI° L"SPFC1ZCnb NINTHLY RM- RT MARCH, 1982 Vw-?FCPION/OFFICF FOURS This Month Year -Tb -Date Building 52 106 Plumbing 23 73 EVAC 24 92 Electric 55 129 Water Softener 9 19 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 0 0 Signs 9 12 NATURE. OF NJILDING PERMITS ISSUED Nkrnber 1_his Month Year -Tb -Date Building 117.0 —7759-7— Plumbing 91.0 253.0 i?VAC 63.5 127.0 Adninistrative/Office 126.0 709.0 Fire Marshal 44.0 63.0 Miscellaneous 29.5 67.0 General Office 185.0 382.0 Permit Processing 136.5 2.40.0 City Council Meeting 1.5 1.5 This Month Year -Tb -Date Building 52 106 Plumbing 23 73 EVAC 24 92 Electric 55 129 Water Softener 9 19 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 0 0 Signs 9 12 NATURE. OF NJILDING PERMITS ISSUED Nkrnber Type Units Va1_u.iation Peramt Fee Plan Checic Fe T t 23 Single Famil 23 ,318,000.00 $6,923.50 $3,461.75 $37,999.75 4 Pumlex 4 175,000.00 $1,019.5n $ 509.75 $ 6,036.75 12 1-ulti-Famil 12 521,000.00 $1,989.00 $ 994.50 $16,461.00 0 Cmawrieal 0 - - - - 0 Industrial 0 - - - - 0 Institutional 0 - - - - I Res. C.amae 1 5,000.On $ 50.50 - $ 53.00 1 Shim. Pool 1 8,500.00 1 $ 74.50 $ 37.25 $ 116.25 11 Miscellaneous 11 $ 74,962.00 1 $ 664.00 $ 221.00 $ 923.50 52 ITUDUS 52 $2.,107,162.00 ` $10,721.00 S5,224.25 $61,.590.25 * Total Fees Include: Pu:Llr?in.T Perrot Fee, Sus -Charge, Plan Check Fee, SAC liv.t Fee, hater Connection Fee, 4hter Nbter Fee and Road Lhit Fee. /40 0 TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. Fd=, CITY PLANNER DATE: APRIL 15, 1982 RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DENSITY CALCULATIONS It is staff's understanding that on April 6, 1982, the City Council had a discussion in regard to how densities were calculated on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. In calculting the densities in the Comprehensive Guide Plan, staff looked at each parcel on a semi -gross basis. That is, that existing road rights-of-way such as County roads and proposed parks etc. were the only items deducted from the areas or land use segments -prior to placing the density to those individual parcels. Staff did not try to determine the land use designations by deducting all proposed rights-of-way in areas that have not been developed. In using the terminology of net developable land vs. gross developable land, staff primarily used the gross acreage and applied the densities to the individual parcels. When an individual parcel is presented to be developed, then staff would be using the criteria in Ordinance 52, the Zoning Ordinance, to determine the net developable area by the development plan submitted to the City for review at that time. In projecting the saturation population in accordance with the land use plan, staff used the mid-range number of the density range on the gross acreage for its density calculations. What this mans is staff used the number 4.5, which is midway between the R-2 (3-6 dwelling units per acre) on a gross basis. In using an exaTrple to demonstrate has the density calculation is tabulated, look at the R-2 districts which indicate the density of 3-6 dwell- ing units per acre, and if there is a 20 -acre parcel, the calculation would be done as follows: 20 acres X 4.5 dwelling units per acre = 90 dwelling units (or that particular 20 -acre parcel) It is staff's understanding that there was a question between gross and net acreage on doing the calculations. If we would take that same 20 -acre par- cel and take the acreage, or factoring approximately 258 of the gross area as net area, we would then have 15 net acres, and if you used the high end in an R-2 District or the 6 dwelling units per acre, it would be 15 net acres times 6 dwelling units per acre equal 90 dwelling units, or approximately the same total number of dwelling units in using the mid-range density calcula- tion on a gross basis. If the density calculation is done on a net land basis and use the mid-range of an R-2 District of 4.5 dwelling units per acre, the calculations for saturation for population will be about 25-28% lower than the projections that were originally proposed in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Also looking at the calculation done in this fashion when using the net acreage and the mid-range number of 4.5 dwelling units per acre, the gross density would then turn out to be approximately 3.25 dwelling units per acre, or predominantly all single family development. It was not staff's in- tention that all of the R-2 land use designations in the City should develop in a single family character which it would be do using the mid-range density factor and the net acreage. 14 l Thomas L. Hedges Comprehensive Plan Density Calculations April 15, 1982 Page two The way staff uses the land.use plan on a very general basis is that when a developer or land owner is looking at individual parcels on the land use guide and the four residential land use districts, give a range of density per district. Staff uses the 0-3 dwelling units per acre as a guide for single family development. An R-2, 3-6 dwelling units per acre, staff indi- cates at the low end of this range would be single family; the high end of this range could be townhouse development. An R-3 land use density range, 6-12 units per acre, staff indicates low range to be townhouse development, high range to be garden apartments, and R-4, 12 units + per acre would be multiple development. This is a very general basis on viewing the Compre- hensive Guide Plan as to the type of dwelling units which could fit into each specific land use classification. It is also conceivable that you could work a different mixture of housing types such as multiple and single family development in an R-2 parcel and still achieve the Guide Plan range for saturation population. The last thing staff would like to express is that although the City has set up a land use guide and project saturation population, the main cbjec- tive of the Land Use Guide is that the City develops in a manner that is consistent with the infastructures, or all the utilities required to pro- vide nrvide adequate capacities or residential development to come in the future. As mentioned all the way through the Comprehensive Guide Plan is that the Guide Plan is only a guide to use for development purposes. It is the whole intention that the City Council has the sole discretion on determining what type of dwelling unit would be allowed in each of the land use classifica- tions, or between the density ranges provided in the land use calculations. Therefore, the City Council has the discretion on each and every development proposal to determine if single family, duplex, townhouse or multiple on a development by development basis. If the Council can give direction to the staff in regard to how density calculations have been made or how they in- tend to interpret the Land Use Guide Plan will be helpful so the staff is not wasting their time, the developer's time or the City Council's tire with inappropriate development proposals. Hopefully this has explained some of the issues regarding density calcula- tions in regard to the Comprehensive Guide Plan. If anyone has any ques- tions or would like further explanation, please feel free to contact me so we can make this information available. 14'2, y A' MM TO: FnNORAnY MAYOR, CM (pUN M MEMBERS, CITY ADMPUS BATOR ACID CITY DEPARIMFT1fS FRCM: DOUG RF.ID, CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR DATE: APRIL 15, 1982 SURTFCr: EARLY WARNING PROCEDURES Now that the summer storm season is just around the corner, a reminder as to warning systems is in order. 'Last year, after much discussion, the eommmities of northern Dakota County chose to deviate from the procedure that is suggested by the National Weather Service. The Weather Service suggests that the sirens be activated only for very severe thunder storms, tornados and nuclear attacks. Because of our location, on the edge of t that most storms travel from southwest to of ample time to warn our residents if we = severe storm. IFistory has taught us reason, storms which had been only severe warning as they entered Dakota County. to metro radar range, and the fact northeast, we could not be assured waited for the declaration of a another lesson. For some unexplainable in nature, built to very severe without It is for these reasons that the cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, Lakeville and Rosemount have chosen to activate their warning sirens in the event of a severe storm warning. This was a collective decision because our siren systems have—Ye—en designed to provide an overlap. If all are activated, simultaneously, there should be less confusion and a greater likelihood of those outdoors hearing a siren anywhere in northern Dakota County. It must be pointed out that these are all outdoor warning systems. It simply is not practical to design a system which could offer indoor warning. Hopefully, those in their homes, place of business or automobile will be tuned to a radio or TV station which will provide the necessary warning. If/when you hear a warning siren, tune to one of the major radio or television stations. DO NOr Rhone your police dispatch center unless you have an actual eros envy. 'these people will have their hands Bull and will not be able to answer storm re ated questions. the local media do a very good job of keeping people updated. The dispatchers will relay information to the US Weather Service, who in turn are umnitored by all major radio and TV stations. ) 43