The URL can be used to link to this page

11/09/1982 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL NOVEMBER 9, 1982 6:30 P.M. I. 6;30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:33 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES p.� III. 6:35 - ESTABLISH BOND SALE DATE FOR GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS - MILLER & 1 SCHROEDER, INC., ERNIE CLARK rI IV. 6:40 - TAX ABATEMENTS - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE e V. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS Q.NO A. Fire Department Q,kO B. Police Department Q,10 C. Park Department Iti'L D. Public Works Department VI. 6:55 - CONSENT ITEMS (One motion approves all items) ?AS A. Project 366, Receive Feasibility Report (Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir) ef-5 B. Approve MnDOT Plans & Specs (I-494 Retention Ponds) '17 C. Project 342, Receive Petition (Elimination of Nicols Frontage Road) tLOJ D. Contract 82-6, Change Order #1 (Deep Well #7) '?"141E. Grading/Excavation Permit, NW'k of Section 2 (T.H. 55 -McLean Property p�\ F. Project 369, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Sheffied \ Addition - Streets & Utilities) VII. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS 3LA. Project 297-R, Final Assessment Hearing (Blackhawk Lake Outlet) B. Ordinance Codification Q9j1 C. Housing Plan Modifications VIII. OLD BUSINESS IX. NEW BUSINESS p 3OXA. Bradley W. Hanson for a 10' Setback Variance to Construct a Garage ` 20' from the Right -of -Way of a Public Street Located on Lot 22, Block 1, Wilderness Run 3rd Addition, in Section 27, 1281 Vildmark Dr. 50 B. Temporary Advertising Signs for Countryside Builders, Inc. VS3 C. Lone Oak Heights, Consideration of Preliminary Plat Extension to (Orrin Aune) `0 b D. Hilltop of Eagan, Consideration of Final Plat Approval (Developer's e' Construction) 6% E. Richard Hallady Concerning a Building Permit Application for a Q Detached Storage Building at 3248 Terminal Drive qd 63 F. Consideration of a Swimming Pool Ordinance .9 Eagan City Council Agenda November 9, 1982 Page Two X. ADDITIONAL ITEMS Q 70 A. Contract 82-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Brittany 4th & Safari Reservoir Watermain) B. Contract 82-14, Approve Plans & Spec, Order Advertisement for P' Bids (Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir) .0-C. Approve Joint Use Agreement for Road Access, Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir D. Reapportionment of Special Assessments - Canterbury, Wedgwood e & Oakwood Heights Additions tIG E. Ridgecliffe 1st Addition, Time Extension of Development Contract XI. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the agenda) XII. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COU'NCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 1982 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval of the October 19, 1982 regular City Council minutes and special City Council minutes for the October 27 meeting and the November 9, 1982 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration: G.O. BOND SALE - MILLER & SCHROEDER MUNICIPALS. INC. There are two (2) bond sales proposed for a sale date of December 8, 1982 at 12:00 noon. The City is to consider the issuance of $965,000 general obligation city hall bonds and $2,500,000 general obligation improvement bonds. The City will be able to save expen- ses by selling both issues at the same time through the printing of one prospectus, combined staff time for Miller & Schroeder Muni- ciples, Inc., and reduced costs for bond ratings. The two issues are a $965,000 for general obligation city hall bonds, a copy of which is enclosed on pages 2 through 3 , and a $2,500,000 general obligation improveme-n—t-'B-o—na issue, a copy of which is enclo- sed on pages + through 6 The information describing the general obligation mprovement and issue does include a listing of all projects that are included in that proposed bond sale. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1. A motion is in order to consider the establishment of a bond sale date for December 8, 1982 to sell $965,000 of general obligation city hall bonds and $2,500,000 general obligation improvement bonds (12:00 noon); and 2. A motion is in order to consider the designation of a special City Council meeting for December 8, 1982 at 5:00 p.m. ,f Tall i�ree Minnesota (800) 862-6002 • ..Toll Fre:, other States (800) 328-6122 9 Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 • (612) 831-1500 November 1, 1982 SALE MEMO TO Mr. Stephen Rosholt Faegre & Benson 1300 Northwestern Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 FROM Ernest L. Clark ISSUE $965,000 General Obligation City Hall Bonds, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota INITIAL RESOLUTION November 9, 1982, Regular Council Meeting, 6:30 P.M. SALE DATE December 8, 1982, 12 o'clock noon, award special Council meeting, 5 o'clock P.M. DATED DATE December 1, 1982 DUE DATE December 1 MATURITIES $ 25,000-1984 40,000-1985 50,000-1986/90 75,000-1991/92 100,000-1993/97 INTEREST December 1, 1983 and semiannually thereafter on December 1 and June 1 REDEMPTION December 1, 1994, bonds due 1995 through 1997 and any interest date thereafter, at par. RATES 8 coupon rates allowed, in ascending order, to be expressed in multiples of 1/20th of 1%. DISCOUNT $15,000 allowed Z Headquarters_ Minneapolis_, Minnesota Branch Officer Downtown ,Minneapolis • Solana Beach. California • iYorNbrook. Illinois • SL Paul. Minnesota • Naples. Florida • Carsan City iYe,ada .Mernoer ul ttte Secunues imestar Ratecuon Corpommn DENOMINATION $5,000 unless purchaser, within 48 hours of award specifies a higher denomination in multiples of $5,000. PAYING AGENT Designated by successful bidder within 48 hours of sale to be ratified by the City. The City will pay reasonable fees. GOOD FAITH . $19,300 Cashier's or Certified Check or Bank Draft. FUNDS Bond proceeds must be in immediately available funds not Clearing House Funds. PROJECT INFORMATION Building Expansion Costs $750,000 Remodeling Costs, Existing City Hall 50,000 Architect's Fee 64,000 Equipment, construction contingencies 80,000 Issuance Costs 21,000 Total $965,000 ILI oil Fte Minnesota (800) 862-6002 i • b:l Free Cather States (800) 328-6122 L Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 a 1612) 831-1500 November 1, 1982 i;1,1M a olv • TO Mr. Stephen Rosholt Faegre & Benson 1300 Northwestern Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 FROM Ernest L. Clark ISSUE $2,500,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1982, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota. INITIAL RESOLUTION November 9, 1982, Regular Council Meeting, 6:30 P.M. SALE DATE December 8, 1982, 12 O'clock Noon, award special Council meeting, 5 o'clock P.M. DATED DATE December 1, 1982 DUE DATE June.l MATURITIES $625,000-1984 300,000-1985/88 150,000-1989 100,000-1990/93 50,000-1994 25,000-1995/97 INTEREST June 1, 1983 and semiannually thereafter on June 1 and December 1 REDEMPTION On June 1, 1992, bonds due 1993 through 1997 and any interest date thereafter, at par. 0 Headquarters: Minneapolis. Minnesota Branch Offices: Downtown Minneapolis • Solana Beach, Ca Iifornra • ❑onhorook. Illinois • 5L Paul. Minnesow • iNeples. Fipnda • Orson City. Nevada rlemoer of the Se<urmes Inrezmr Proreaion Cn,w,aton RATES 8 coupon rates allowed, in ascending order, to be expressed in multiples of 1/20th of 1%. DISCOUNT $35,000 allowed. $5,000 unless purchaser, within 48 hours of award, specifies a higher denomination in multiples of $5,000. PAYING AGENT Designated by successful bidder within 48 hours of sale to be ratified by the City. The City will pay reasonable fees. GOOD FAITH $50,000 Cashier's or Certified Check or Bank Draft. FUNDS Bond proceeds must be in immediately available funds not Clearing House Funds. BOND PROCEEDS Project Costs $2,180,000 Capitalized_ Interest and Issuance Costs 320,000 $2,500,000 PROTECT See Attachment 5 NUMBER 321 326 332A 343 350 352 NA (Press - Red St) 335B 340B 341B 356 357 360B 363A 364A 366-I 359 (002/81-13) NA 0 0 $2,500,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1982 City of Eagan, Minnesota PROJECT INFORMATION R BOND DESCRIPTION YEARS AMOUNT Hay Lake Trunk Sewer 15 $ 190,000 South Oaks/Trunk Storm Sewer & Sanitary Sewer 15 85,000 Overhill Farm Addition & Hay Lake Trunk Sewer 5 105,000 Briar Hill 4th Addition (Phase II)/Streets & 5 245,000 Utilities Oster Addition/Utilities & Streest 5 90,000 Storland Road/Watermain 5 25,000 Pressure Reducing Station 5 25,000 Twin View Manor 2nd Addition/Streets 5 25,000 Windcrest 2nd Addition/Streets 5 40,000 Windtree 2nd Addition/Streets 5 80,,000 Comsery 1st Addition/Utilities & Streets 10 630,000 Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition/Streets & 5 355,000 Utilities Towerview Road/Street 10 130,000 Hilltop Plaza (James Refrigeratn)/Utilities 10 35,000 Brittany 4th Addition/Watermain 10 30,000 Safari 4.0 MG Water Reservoir/Reservoir 5 55,000 Park Cliff 1st Addition/Storm Sewer 5 15,000 Slaters Road Trunk Water 5 20,000 Project Total $2,180,000 Capitalized Interest 320,000 Total Issue $2,500,000 R Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Two TAX -ABATEMENTS TAX ABATEMENTS - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE Mr. Bill Peterson of the Dakota County Assessor's Office is planning to be present and to recommend two (2) tax abatements. For a copy of the tax abatements and a map showing their location within the community, refer to pages $ through cl ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the two tax abatements as recommended by Dakota County. 4 ABATEMENTS-- • Real Estate: Approved N.W. Mutual Life Ins, #10-00300-020-01 Eagan, City of Shell Oil Company 10-03000-011-25 Eagan, City of Nolter 2, 1982 Upon reviewing the property it was found that the land had been taken by the State Highway Dept. in 1969 for I-494 highway per Louis Robards. The transfer had not been recorded with the county Therefore, the values and taxes should be reduced to nil for 1979, 1980 and 1981. Upon reviewing the property it was found that the building value had been over -valued. ThereforQ, the assessed value should be reduced to $38,166. L 16. AfFENDOM -- -- - ------ 9 - -------- --- J 14bl First Bank Ealp"O.ffim I... .... ...... ......... ....... rd IL rm G1 0010 C IV zr� • llA ' 5i i WA i zu I r(p if 9! A �2 g ,y L-A %.Zs �n APPLE •VALLEY r RosEmotmr r7 17 e....... . ..... Pill, 9 First Bank Ealp"O.ffim I... .... ...... ......... ....... e....... . ..... Pill, `I Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Three DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Fire Department at this time. POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- The State of Minnesota Department of Ad- ministration has developed through joint powers cooperative pur- chasing for certain police equipment which consists of squad cars, radar and other related units. The cooperative purchasing procedure is somewhat similar to that of Hennipin County; the City of Eagan has participated in joint purchasing of certain items of equipment with Hennepin County for the past several years. Enclosed on page 11 is a copy of the cooperative purchasing agreement. The ad- vantages for cooperative purchasing are as follows: reduced costs, improved specifications, increased price competition, indirect savings eliminating administrative duplication and, last but not least, the manpower savings of time of preparing requisitions for bids and making evaluations and testing equipment. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny authori- zing the City of Eagan to enter into a cooperative purchasing agree- ment with the State of Minnesota and to direct the appropriate City official to execute the agreement on the part of the City. PARK DEPARTMENT C. Park Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Park Department at this time. 10 ' COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT (STATE CONTRACTS) WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Administration of the State of Minnesota, procures for State Agencies through competitive bidding various supplies, commodities and equipment, which are then ordered by or for the Agencies by appropriate methods, and WHEREAS, the State Legislature by Minnesota Statutes 1969, Sec. 471.59 has authorized the State and it's Political Subdivisions to enter into agreements to exercise jointly the govermental powers and functions each has individually, and WHEREAS, the State and the *(Name of Political Subdivision) wish to combine their purchasing functions as is specifically provided below so that the *(Political Subdivision)may avail itself of the prices which have been agreed upon by the State and its Vendor. THERFORE, it is the purpose of this Agreement to make available to the *(Political Subdivision) the commodities listed below, at the prices and terms As are available to the State under contracts entered into under competitive bidding pursuant to M.S. (1969), Chapter 16, by the Commissioner of Administration. (listing of commodities) IT IS AGREED that if the Political Subdivision chooses to buy from any such State Contracts, it shall purchase all of its requirements for the above commodities as they arise by placing purchase orders against such State Contracts, for the commodities stated, in accordance with all conditions,, terms, specifications, and prices stated in such contracts. Orders shall be issued by *(Political Subdivision) in accordance with its regularly authorized purchasing procedure. The State Contract number shall be shown on the purchase order. The *(Political Subdivision) shall make payment directly to the Vendor in accordance with it's established procedures. Neither the State nor its purchasing agent, personally or officially, shall assume any responsibility for the accountability of funds expanded hereunder by the *(Political Sub- division), or the issuance or non -issuance of any purchase order by the *(Political Subdivision). Each party shall separately be accountable for its own expenditures of public funds made hereunder. Both parties hereto agree to save and hold each other harmless from any loss or damage for any reason arising from this agreement. (POLITICAL SUBDIVISION) STATE OF MINNESOTA By.... BY Title Title Date, " " " " " Date *(Fill in name of Political Subdivision in these spaces) Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Four PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D. Public Works Department -- Item #1: On Street Parking Complaint - Nicols Road South of Cliff—fiTie Engineering Department as received complaints trom property owners who live south of Cliff Road pertaining to periodic on street parking associated with Durnings Restaurant during peak establishment hours. They have indicated that because of the rural ditch section of Nicols Road and the narrow width of the bituminous surface that the travel way is reduced to one lane in front of Durnings Restaurant at periodic times. They have requested the installation of no parking signs on Nicols Road from Cliff Road to the south property line of Durnings Restaurant to assure that all parking is contained on site. The Engineering Department supports this complaint and recommends consideration of authorizing the installation of no parking signs on both sides of Nicols Road south of Cliff Road. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the in- stallation of no parking signs on Nicols Road south of Cliff Road. Item #2: Cedarvale Boulevard (T.H. 13)/Silver Bell Road Intersec- tion — Left Turn Restriction -- As the Council may recall, the Director of Public Works in ormally discussed the problems associa- ted with the left turn movement at the intersection referenced above. The Police Department has issued approximately 160 citations for people who have made illegal left turns through the break in the median on Silver Bell Road. Enclosed on page 13 is a copy of a memo from the Chief of Police indicating that tris restriction is unenforceable due to the sheer numbers of violations. Earlier this year, Director of Public Works Colbert forwarded a request. to the MnDOT District 9 traffic engineer requesting their review of this interchange and making recommendations as to how we might eliminate and/or minimize the problems associated with this left turn movement. Their response is enclosed on page 14- . In sum- mary, the Police Department and Public Works Department support the closing of the median on Silver Bell Road. MnDOT offers as an alternative the potential designation of Cedarvale Boulevard from Silver Bell Road to Rahn Road as a one way street in the south- west bound direction only. Either of these two options would re- quire all traffic exiting from the Cedarvale Shopping Center to Rahn Road,, Beau D'Rue Drive to the intersection with Silver Bell Road which is presently controlled by a three way stop sign. If either one of these options is not approved, the left turn restric- tion during peak hours should be removed due to its present high degree of non-compliance. Because this is technically MnDOT right- of-way, the Director of Public Works is not sure that MnDOT would approve the removal of this left turn restriction during peak hours. Therefore, the staff is bringing this to the Council's attention for consideration of one of the two alternatives being presented. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the desig- nation of Cedarvale Blvd. as a one way between Silver Bell Road and Rahn Road or authorize the elimination of the median opening on Silver Bell Road at its intersection with Cedarvale Blvd. 1z i Martin DesLaurien Chief of Police Jay M. Berthe Assistant Chief of Police TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Wagarx 3pDt10E Dep0tIT nt i n Thomas L..Hedges, City Administrator Chief of Police 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 1 November 1982 Intersection of Old Highway 13 & Silver Bell Road It is my understanding that MNDOT is responsible for the above intersection. I would like to ask the City Council to authorize MNDOT to build a curb, and to.restrict all left turns from old Highway 13 to new Highway 13 at Siler Bell -Road. We believe all left turns at this intersection should be prohibited. If the above is not feasible, I would like to have the present signs removed. Because of our past experience, we believe these signs are not enforceable. nain DesLauriers MD/vk / CC: Tom Colbert V 13 THE LONE OAK TREE — THE SKVI rOL OF STRENGTH & GROWTH l.%' OUR CO.tl.t/UNITY' 44>0e u1NESo0 Minnepta Department of Transportation District 9 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 September 15, 1982 Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 211999 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 In reply please refer to: 319 S.P. 1901 (TH 13) Silver Bell Road at Old T.H. 13 Left Turn Restriction Dear Mr. Colbert: 2050 (612) 7702311 As requested in your August 23, 1982 letter, we have reviewed the no left turn restriction from northbound Old T.H. 13 to Silver Bell Road. The attached map shows proposed additional signing. This signing directs motorists to use Rahn Road and Beau D'Rue Drive to get to Highway 13 along with advance signing for the no left turn restriction. The large number of violations that your police department is experiencing is not that uncommon. Often, signing will not solve the problem and other solutions that will change the circulation pattern should be looked at. One thought is to make Old T.H. 13 a one—way southwestbound between Rahn Road and Silver Bell Road. This would force motorists to use Rahn Road and Beau D'Rue Drive route. Some temporary traffic control devices, such as barricades and barrels could accomplish making it a one—way on a trial basis. Before we make any signing changes, we request that you review our thoughts for a one—way. It is our experience that many motorists drive by instinct. They may read most of the signs when finding a destination, however, on their return trip, they expect to use the same route they came and disregard or don't read signing on the return trip. These are the motorists that need physical devices in the roadway to force them to use a different route. We have not gone into any detail as to what would all have to be done for a permanent one—way; however, we do not feel it would be too extensive. We will wait to hear from you before doing any changes. If there are any questions, please call Mr. Bruce Hall or myself. Sincerely, Ra(- ALI6t2Yz1_: ►4 Mark R. Wikelius, P.E. District Traffic Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer Attachment: 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Five CONSENT ITEMS. There are six (6) items to be considered under the agenda referred to as Consent Items which require one motion for approval of all items. If there are any items the City Council wishes to discuss in detail, those items should be placed under additional items unless the discussion required is brief. PROJECT 366 A. Project 366, Receive Feasibility Report (Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir) -- Enclosed on pages /& throughZ is a copy of the feasibility report discussing installation and construction of the Safari 4.0 M.G. water reservoir to be constructed on the Sieg property just west of Safari Path adjacent to Apple Valley. Funding for this project will be provided from the existing trunk water funds for supply and storage of our water distribution system. Therefore, no public hearing will be required and this report is just being presented for the Council's information. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 366 (Safari 4.0 M.G. water reservoir). IS 0 0 REPORT ON 4.0 MILLION GALLON WATER RESERVOIR PROJECT No. 366 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1982 FILE No. 49222 /3 , Qaaeue, l4"dwlth a 44&w4a& , Yom eawdwiliwq �'Ky�„eya SL ,haw/, Mbumeala /6 0 2335 V. 7-_ _A .4.pL 36 St. naJ, hf - .& 55ff3 PA...- 6f2 - 6364600 October 5, 1982 City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 Attn: Mr. Tom Colbert Re: 4 M.G. Water Reservoir Project No. 366 Our File No. 49222 Dear Mayor and Council: Orw G, Bonmr.h, P.E. Rohn W. Hvrnv. P.E. J03 yh C. AAd Ik, P.E. Bmdf.,d A_ L. ,, P. E. RwftM E, T.nnr. P.E. Jvm.•C. OMm, P.E. GM.. R. r- A. P}.'. Knrh A. Gurdun. PE. Thvm.r E. Ngr,, P.E. RBhvd W. Jbvn. P E. HnMrr G. Shv ,hr. PE. Mvnn L. &n.dm. P.E. Dv.dd C'. bvAuMq 1. E. Jmr A. &arson. P.E. Mad A. /Lown. I. E. TM K. /10d, PE. Mrhm T R.urmunn, PE CA.,kr A. Erak,a !.ro M. P..YAAr /lanvn M. Obn. Orme F.'. Otwn Transmitted herewith is our report for the 4 million gallon water reservoir, Project No. 366 located on the recently acquired site in the Sieg property in Section 31. This report covers the trunk water main extension from Safari Pass to the site, the necessary access driveway, the steel water reservoir and related de- tails. The location and construction of this water reservoir is in accordance with the 1982 Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution System Report for the City of Eagan. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. .p (a-� Robert W. Rosene RWR:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Robert W. Rosene Date: October 5, 1982 Reg. No. 3488 Approved by; c _ � by; A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Date: 140 - -d',1 17 0 4 MILLION GALLON WATER RESERVOIR SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of a 4 million gallon steel water reservoir which will provide water storage for the high elevation pres- sure zone in the southern portion of the City. This reservoir is located as shown on the 1982 Water Supply and Distribution System Master Plan and will have a high water elevation of 1150. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible and is in accor- dance with the 1982 Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution System Master Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out in two contracts. The first contract will include the installa- tion of the 24" diameter trunk water main and access driveway from the exist- ing 24" main in Safari Pass to the reservoir site. The second contract will include the 4 million gallon steel water reservoir together with related de- tails and additional crushed rock surfacing for the access driveway. ;eThe estimated project costs presented herein are based on anticipated cur- rent costs. The site of the reservoir and the access easement to the site have previously been acquired. Costs associated with the acquisition of this property have not been included in the costs shown herein. DISCUSSION: At the present time, developed property in the High Elevation Pressure Zone in the southern part of the City is served by the water booster station located on Cliff Road east of Pilot Knob Road. A small pneumatic tank at the booster station maintains pressure on the system together with the electric motor driven booster pumps. In recent years, the residential growth in this pressure zone has increased rapidly until there are now over 1,000 - 1 - 2022b 118 homes being served in this zone. If a power outage occurs or if the booster station controls are disrupted by lightning, less than a 15 minute supply of water is available in the pneumatic tank. This has happened on several occa- sions in the past. The Water Distribution System Master Plan shows a 4 million gallon ground storage reservoir west of Safari Pass in Section 31 close to the south Eagan City limits. With the construction of the 20" diameter trunk water main in the relocated Galaxie Avenue, it is now feasible to construct this reservoir and serve the entire high elevation pressure zone with this reservoir. With its completion, the service in the high zone will be more dependable. The current booster station will be used to fill this reservoir and the current pneumatic tank will not be required for ordinary service. It will, however, be retained for use in the event of a water main break or when required during repainting of the water reservoir. The new steel reservoir will be equipped with cathodic protection using the permanent anode system which does not require yearly changing of the an- odes. It will also have telemetering equipment to control the booster station so as to maintain the proper tank level. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: This reservoir will serve all of the high elevation pressure zone in the southern portion of Eagan. No assessments will be re- quired. The project will be paid for from funds collected from connection charges for supply and storage. These connection charges are collected from each building connected to the water system at the time of construction and from Commercial/Industrial Zoned property on an acreage basis when trunk water main is made available to that property. 2 - 2022b I p e 0 0 COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented at the back of this re- port. A summary of these costs are as follows: Contract A - Trunk Water Main h Access Drive $ 61,740.00 Contract B - Water Reservoir 870,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST .............. $931,740.00 The total estimated project cost as outlined herein including contingen- cies and all related overhead is $931,740.00. Overhead costs are estimated at 27% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. EASEMENTS: The site required for this reservoir and the access road easement to the site have previously been acquired from the Sieg family. No other easements or land acquisition will be required for this project. ASSESSMENTS: No assessments are required to be levied against benefited prop- erty for this project. All costs are to be paid from connection charges to be received for water supply and storage from developed properties served by the water system. Current rates being charged are as follows: Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial $420/Lot $335/Unit $1,945/Developable Acre (It should be noted that the $1,945 per acre charged to Commercial/Indus- trial property includes trunk main oversizing as well as water supply and storage. One half of the charge is to be allocated to main oversizing and the other half to supply and storage.) 2022b - 3 - WN 9 0 REVENUE SOURCES: The revenue sources to cover the cost of this project will be from existing funds in the supply and storage trunk fund or from general obligation bonds to be paid for from future supply and storage connection charges. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Present feasibility report Approve Plans and Specifications - Part I Approve Plans and Specifications - Part II Open Bids - Part I Open Bids - Part II Award Contract - Part I Award Contract - Part II Construction Completion - 4 - 2022b �` November 9, 1982 October 5, 1982 November 9, 1982 October 27, 1982 December 2, 1982 November 9, 1982 December 7, 1982 November, 1983 4 MILLION GALLON WATER RESERVOIR COST ESTIMATE PROJECT NO. 366 PART I TRUNK WATER MAIN AND ACCESS DRIVE 700 Lin.ft. 24" Diameter D.I.P. Water Main @ $40.00/lin.ft 1 Each Hydrant @ $800.00/each 1 Each Connect to 24" diameter main @ $500.00/each LUMP SUM Clear and Grub @ L.S. LUMP SUM Seeding with topsoil @ L.S. LUMP SUM Grading and Borrow @ L.S. 300 Ton Class II Aggregate base @ $6.67/ton +5X Contingencies +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest TOTALTRUNK WATER MAIN ............................... PART II WATER RESERVOIR Steel Reservoir 94' diameter by 78' high Concrete Foundation Cathodic Protection, Permanent Anodes Painting and Disinfection Piping and Valves Electrical and Controls Site Work +27X Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest TOTAL WATER RESERVOIR ................................ CONTRACT A - TRUNK WATER MAIN CONTRACT B - WATER RESERVOIR TOTAL PROJECT .......................... �C 2022b 2Z $ 28,000 800 500 4,000 3,500 7,500 2,000 $ 46,300 2,315 $ 48,615 13,125 $ 61,740 $460,000 70,000 20,000 90,000 20,000 18,000 7,000 $685,000 185,000 $870,000 $ 61,740 870,000 $931,740 C� %DDER Q AGE SAFARI 4.0 MILLION GALLON NATER RESERVOIR PROJECT No. 366 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESiROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASWC., INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS St. Paul, mimeses 23 FILE No. 49222 SAFARI PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE 30' PERMANENT EASEMENT Scale: f=100' PROPOSED 24° DIP WATER MAIN — 2504 PART 11 0 c0 N 15 EXISTING 24° WATER MAIN I� II II II l So. LINE SEC. 31 Ili I I SAFARI II 1, 4.0 MILLION GALLON i WATER RESERVOIR SITE ll II PROJECT No. 366 ill EAGAN, MINNESOTA LVE PIT 24 @OWMNO, ROSENE, ANDERIIK & AStK RN;. CONSULTM UJFAMURS St. Paul, Nlaaaaeta FILE No. 49222 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Six MnDOT PLANS & SPECS - I-494 RETENTION PONDS B. Approve MnDOT Plans & Specs (I-494 Retention Ponds) -- The City has received detailed plans and specifications for the con- struction of storm water detention ponds for the I-494 interstate to be located on the Bloomington side of the Minnesota River. These plans also involve the elimination of the construction road within the Minnesota River Valley. Because a portion of this project is technically located within the City of Eagan, formal approval by Council action is required prior to awarding of the contact by MnDOT. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To pass the resolution approving the detailed plans and specifications for S.P. 1986-25 (494=393) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said resolution. PROJECT 342 C. Project 342, Receive Petition (Elimination of Nicols Frontage Road) -- Enclosed on pages *a (o and 'Z is a petition the City received from six of the seven affected property owners who live on the Nicols Road frontage road located between Sapphire Lane and Cedar Grove Elementary School in the Cedar Grove 1st Addition. If the Council receives this petition, the elimination of this frontage road will be included in Project 342, discussing the recon- struction/repair of streets in the Cedar Grove 1st Addition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for elimination of the Nicols frontage road under Project 342. as BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMASEGAN CITY OF -ALAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER 2TN PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMBERS P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN,MINNESOTA $1122 July 8, 1982 PHONE 454-6100 JOE CARROLL 4106 NICOLS RD EAGAN MN 55122 �y Re: Project #342 - Petition for Frontage Road Elimination Dear Mr. Carroll: THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE 'CITY CLERK l Attached to this letter is a sample petition form as you requested pertaining to the elimination of the frontage road adjacent to Nicols Road as a part of the proposed upcoming Cedar Grove street restoration project referenced above. Please feel free to modify this petition if you feel that it does not specifically address your concerns. It would be advantageous to have this petition form returned to my attention by the end of July so that we can incorporate it in our feasibility report which will be presented to the City Council for use at the future public hearing discussing these improve— ments. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions as we go through the process. Sincerely, omas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/hnd Enclosure 2(0 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. L �• For City Use Only • Petition # 3 Ve j Date Received 7_�;_�.� PETITION 'Presented to Council j_ p PROJECT #342 CEDAR GROVE FRONTAGE ROAD ELIMINATION We, the undersigned owners of the real property adjacent to Nicols Road, hereby petition the City Council to consider the elimination of the existing frontage road in front of our residences and to construct a driveway con- nection directly to Nicols Road. We would also like to request that the existing area presently used as frontage road be removed and replaced with topsoil and grass. We understand that by signing this petitionwe are requesting the City to perform a feasibility study wherein the estimated costs of these improve- ments will be tabulated. We understand that upon completion of this re- quested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the facts contained in the feasibility report as presented at the public hearing. This petition is being submitted because of the concern pertaining to the deteriorated state of this frontage .road and our desires to have it eliminated and restored as a grassy front yard area with direct driveway connection onto Nicols Road. Sig uof La and Omer - Address of Property CEDgR C,it a7 C / / L3 62 le) /V r i a S (�c L 6 13 2 /11a Ly Q2 LS 82 L 7 (3 2 I ' ,i a _ I e/,,� 11 r t</ tr y,N n'V �. r. =.•i 'rr� , . `•' C ' ! f 0 ': a✓'4 r,r �atN. , / 1 y J � /A ' 7Q ' ' 4.a 4 o ��t , /, i I it _ r ,• _ • r to �; t ••. Ir L ',' L,:u Am • , ,L '• �. t, +I, t 7 t f W . q is 'r ,r J '� ,I Q � ,C � ' II •j r , ' .,"'._ JL r > if ` ,•SAPPHIRE LANE e a tA, r•,r t, •• T4, w - ..��n :•:Ti:;1 t, a ! ,r r, •'s f .t •!—.JJ� 'Lr FM JI re I; � Ma rr r.' "y � .)� , LU —y- . K . c ,s a ,.1,•— • fey • •I � 1, �_ if to `•• to .' t . ` rf' �' 4q ,. �A •� `"Ly, tie " la10 14 11 I I L'„ , f •r l� t / ,, e a t .. r •`\ s r • ' / It to ' .. ,J ..,, 't Arr,� �' Up,r•' .r �r 7• t u it to r ro / G la "►'$ 4 ( x 9QNp w1 s ' f • 11 • rt �" ` //yyFRK �\:` t Z12 CON LANE LLJ rrr—a °o t Q /I r1 :rt U to r• q r7 n q r1 n.t 0 9 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Seven CONTRACT 82-6 D. Contract 82-6, Change Order #1 (Deep Well #7) -- During the construction of the City's deep well #7, further evaluation deter- mined that the proposed 16" casing should be replaced by an 18" casing which would allow greater flexibility in future pump design when this well is ultimately to be developed and used. Although the construction of an 18" casing liner is $1,338 more than the 16" casino included in the original contract, this additional cost will be more than made up by the savings in cement grouting to be installed between the 18" liner and the 24" drilled hole. The overall net impact on the contract will be an overall net savings of approximately $500. However, because this change in design results in a change in the scope of the project, a formal change order must be processed at this time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 82-6 (Deep Well #7) for an additional $1,338. GRADING PERMIT - T.H. 55 E. Grading/Excavation Permit, NWk of Section 2 (T.H.55 - McLean Property) -- The City has received an application for a grading and excavation permit to place approximately 250,000 C.Y. on the property located as referenced on page 30 This work would be performed by the Johnson Brothers Construction Company which is presently doing the grading operations for the R.E.S. grading permit and also performing the grading work for the City of Eagan on the Kollofski and Schindeldecker property around O'Neill Pond by Blue Gentian Road. The McLean Hudak property is located just westerly of the present grading operations. All application fees, bonds, insurance certificates and grading plans have been submitted, reviewed and approved by the Engineering Division. All requirements placed on the previous excavation permits by Johnson Brothers would also apply to this requested permit. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the grading/exca- vation permit for Johnson Brothers Company over the McLean -Hudak property (NW4 of Section 2, T.H. 55). 25 N.W. VISSEC, 2, T 21T, R 23 ...... ..... N7, I . ....... BERNARD H C WTT %UftV MKQTAcou. "MEW, Eft. - MCLEAN ,HUDAK 410 040 f HOM- 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Eight PROJECT 369 0 F. Project 369, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Shef- ""'°""'"field —Addition '=—'Streets & Utilities) -- The City has received a written request from the developer of the Sheffield Addition to have the City install the required public utilities and streets to service this proposed subdivision. .:!�\a.,.,.t'ex71A-nY:"• . et>S4-'hn,,.�..,-•V<; •- - ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 369 (Sheffield Addition) and order the preparation -gf a feasibility report. UP 9-46 •- - . -^ 1 sir .... z - • 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Nine PUBLIC HEARINGS PROJECT 297-R - FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING A. Project 297-R, Final Assessment Hearing (Blackhawk Lake Outlet) -- On September 7, the City Council formally vacated the final assessments for three property owners as levied at the July 20 Council meeting due to irregularities in the notification of the original public hearing held on May 20, 1980. Subsequently, a new public hearing process was initiated for these three indivi- duals with a public hearing for this revised project being held on October 5, 1982. At this meeting, the public hearing was closed, ;-u-,%,the project approved and the final assessment roll received with the final assessment hearing being scheduled for November 9, 1982. The "following parcels and ownerships being included under this ublic6hearing ,•process dare — =� •- .,, •- �'�.• 1 T o- :i. ,+�a�:.�ar.F ,,,. cx °Sp,�'-'S; me+ii:--o."+rtMaw�m.e.�=-�. - - Parcel.,u; 10-,02100-010-04 (Floyd and Victoria Bryant) - 10,-727 .for y7 42 acres "Parcel #10-02100-010-02 (David Ashfeld) - $19,652 for 13.27 r .-cr?'rs+�;'�5�'"'�7'��P�.a.�r'=�!;av 3. Lot 7, Block _1, King's Wood Addition (James Horne) - T-- $561.'- 4. Lots 1-6, 8-10,. Outlots 1-3, King's Wood Addition (Horne Dev'el6pment''Corporation'-_-$11,173.24 5. Parcel #10-02100-010-01 (Horne Development Corp.) - $31,857.17 for 26.89 acres. These final assessment rates were calculated in accordance with the 1980 trunk area storm sewer rate of 3.4¢ per square foot it accordance with present City policy pertaining to large lots. However, no additional costs have been included for any potential property appraisals that may be required to objectioning property owners wishing to pursue their assessment through an appeal process. Similar to the Thomas Lake trunk storm sewer assessment, the Council may wish to consider allocating an additional $100 per legal parcel to cover the cost of property appraisal analysis that will be re- quired for any objection and/or appeal. Enclosed on page is a reference map identifying the parcels in question by their respective reference numbers for the Council's information. Because two different Council actions will be required depending upon the property owners' response to this final assessment hearing, the following two alternatives are available to the Council as deemed appropriate by the circumstances that may prevail. 32- 0 • Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Ten A. Close public hearing, approve the final assessment roll and authorize certification to Dakota County. B. Receive and acknowledge all written objections submitted, authorize a property appraisal analysis and continue the final assessment hearing until a later date. ?*All appropriate,. -notices have been forwarded to the affected property owners and published in the legal newspaper pertaining to the recent ...,-owners ' public hearing and the November 9 final assessment hearing. A"1� 4 -ACTION "TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: ,J,;.,",,,action pertaining to alternatives A or B. - .. .sMl�1As;•p.W.kY:.ls'^.J�,�•-a•.F......-.ve�.�--.,_� _. To take the appropriate _•.. .. _—.t., 33 ' "i•. V ND ` +r :E•t+n cgyi.+� "V,�L`+vGc�!rYv4st ysax 4: -an s y.. � e i'+• r. tit" � Iw / :7•_. I _ �. ZiRWME'y �JW YNfl M WISiROMOR azo-ec Jc+ ..`PRC DR reKA o (E'NS J -u t 'MBUBsx `'sv3i L°j'et-.�% � } •" �', f:4., 1 �, S yy a �. r-�[r ¢ S nC _ : ,� - _ � Jx•-r: a rr'4. .,e /)Lrzj Ae.. • Ke //y oro -o7 =r-7 aeo�y� oo�yhe.-fy a / Neomd G. /lainau/f TRUMAN e. WP.YVER '0 - � / Oro -oµ t O y ' 07e -07 a j )oe SECTION Z --- Oi o•ol ToMN p 1 i r l A /6o o - 6 �' :Az r are, ii:. '%'• : it ;•v ci Ff14 J H O IZ NE lYC LO P M E NT .D a y `lt"^�`.7�`'r'31 -, ss ry-�tt�dx. • Li .. 2 4 i. A•JQMXV .A O �k.49ltN �.�+irnaY....-`H,5'_�.-.;v+'.r1!i..-�u�C�c-� _....�• y..,c:..r,::sv .-i __....'i aSG:�`-� •-.w;�r, ... , •, �C -•-_. .._Q•0." _ ' "i•. V ND ` +r :E•t+n cgyi.+� "V,�L`+vGc�!rYv4st ysax 4: -an s y.. � e i'+• r. tit" � Iw / :7•_. I _ �. ZiRWME'y �JW YNfl M WISiROMOR azo-ec Jc+ ..`PRC DR reKA o (E'NS J -u t 'MBUBsx `'sv3i L°j'et-.�% � } •" �', f:4., 1 �, S yy a �. r-�[r ¢ S nC _ : ,� - _ � Jx•-r: a rr'4. .,e /)Lrzj Ae.. • Ke //y oro -o7 =r-7 aeo�y� oo�yhe.-fy a / Neomd G. /lainau/f TRUMAN e. WP.YVER '0 - � / Oro -oµ t O y ' 07e -07 a j )oe Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Eleven ORDINANCE CODIFICATION B. Ordinance Codification -- Approximately one year ago, the City Council authorized Municipal Ordinance Codifiers, Inc., to recodify all City ordinances. Recodification of City ordinances consists of compiling all existing ordinances into respective chapters of a City code document. Each of the ordinances has been reviewed and updated to be consistent with current laws. Further new ordi- ,.,nances that have been recently adopted by the City Council will be incorporated into the ordinance codification. The chapters ,f„0,,,;to,be considered in the codification are as follows: General Provisions and Definitions Applicble to Entires Code Including Penalty for Violation .General!Government ilc-a:&Utiiities -: Rules Wand .VRegulations, Collections isti^uction `Licensing , Permits and Regulations, Including ;nes ' �,{v-.-Licensing, tions'�and°$ ,,M obile.,Vome Parks,,..,, M _ ��" .. : �� t• _Beery, Wine and Liquor -Licensing and Regulation _._.. 6. Other Business Regulation and Licensing n. .. -»£tii,4t!a7lio�aMTd ...y a.�<•.e.-ms •_•r.::,^ -".Y`':.-3:. • �S^. _ :is' Stree s an Sidewalks'benerally - Iy*.-''.tea%' 1~•...,.8. Traffic Regulations '9.—,Parking Regulations - 10. Public Protection, Crimes and Offenses 11. Land Use Regulation (Zoning) 12. Flood Plain Regulation 13. Subdivision Regulations (Platting) 14.-19. Reserve Chapters 20. Listing of Uncoded Ordinances in Effect Predraft and postdraft sessions have been attended by City Council representative, City Councilmember Egan, City Attorney Hauge and City Administrator Hedges. Also included for parts of those ses- sions were each of the respective department heads who have reviewed 3S 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Twelve with the ordinance codifiers ordinances that relate to their depart- mental operations. Any substantive changes have been previously reviewed with the City Council and the appropriate action taken iith"the-'same recommendations provided to the codifiers. The time commitment and cooperation that was given by City Council -member Egan has been greatly appreciated and has provided the City Council an on hands legislative review of the entire process. A public '•hearing is not required for an ordinance codification; however, was deemed appropriate by the City Council for the purpose of providing the public with an opportunity to raise any questions the purpose or need for ordinance codification or questions that might relate to the content of the revised ordinances. Copies __*0, K rof all chapters are on file in the office of the City Administrator and have been available for public inspection. The information is too lengthy to copy. ---However, City Councilmember Egan has had omplete;.wcopy,,t�+as.:,well:.-as ,City Attorney_Hauge, -,of all Lchapters orr�review purposes.,4The Municipal Ordinance Codifiers will: -'proceed withaf nal publication•,,of,4the:ordinance -codification and ,the ef- ective%date-gof- the- new City =.code -will be -January 1, � 1983. :,Copies _. 'f -the'V ew `City 'code will --be made available •`in early December due o `the ''fact that it =will be necessary for the City Council to "prove- `n�osdnancetoneof„the ;early meetings _in December. -that effectively adopts the ordinance codification.ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve final printing of the City code for purposes of proceeding with the final public hearing and adoption of an ordinance adopting the new City code. 3-°"`.- _- .'A•s .+.nGs�.,s�.a e,,.r.3Ni.. S;.'y` :. .. .-YryW1 a.'"5A.'.[ Rafid",y\'FT'C�NJ,��.. -rt\.{I�.. u.u,. r� -.L !' [a.•:. r, - 36 .,94 •. 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Thirteen HOUSING PLAN MODIFICATIONS C. Housing Plan Modifications -- As the City Council recalls, "'action "was• taken -at a recent City Council meeting to consider a mortgage revenue bond program utilizing the Dakota County HRA. The program is the Senior Citizens/First Time Homebuyer Program that is to be authorized by the Dakota County HRA and would make mortgage money available in Eagan, Mendota Heights and West St-. Paul. In order that the program meet requirements of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, it was necessary that the Cities of Mendota � ,..Heights and West St. Paul adopt a housing plan, and in the case of Eagan that the current housing plan be updated and appropriately »sbamended. ..A public hearing was set for the November 9, 1982 meeting for the purpose of considering revisions and modifications to the "existing housing plan. Enclosed without page number due to the length�f t�e,-document s_Ta_,,copy _of "the w:revised ,.housing .plan. here,are apo changes , to :the housing plan (pages 1-36) -as it has = fisted;.,howeve,r,,,an.,addition -to the housing plan described as pagesZ_-40.awas='added to provide information about the single family multi-fam11y•4housing program with some detail on the 1983 single family tax exempt bond program. Again, any modification to the usin�gplanannotbecome .effective until after approval by the ity'Counc'i1 review by the Metropolitan Council, and, finally, ,review bye the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. In summary, the pagesto review"are pages 37-40 which briefly describe the program that is consistent with the proposed Dakota County HRA mortgage revenue bond program.. _The order of business to be considered is: 1. :,Adoption of the housing plan at the November 9 meeting. 2. Adopt a resolution (see enclosed on page 3? ) setting "�a public hearing for either the Decembero�ember 21 meeting to consider the program as proposed by the Dakota County HRA which is designed to provide senior citizen/first time homebuyers with mortgage money. Copies of the program will be available at that time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider approval or denial of the housing plan as revised and approval or denial of establishing a public hearing for the senior citizen/first time homebuyer program at either the December 7 or December 21 meeting. 37 0 RESOLUTION No. 0 Setting Public Hearing on Housing Bond Program WHEREAS, the City of Eagan (the "City") is interested in developing a first- time homebuyer/senior citizen housing program along with the Cities of West Saint Paul and Mendota Heights and the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"); and WHEREAS, the City is interested in authorizing the HRA to sell housing revenue bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 462C (the "Act") in order to provide loans to the purchasers of housing units sold by senior citizens and other c > -housing units in the City; and WHEREAS, the Act requires the adoption of a Housing Bond Program (the "Program") after the holding of a public hearing, after published notice at least 15 days prior to the date of the public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN: -- - - -- — a public_ hearing on the proposed Program - is set for iR9 At n_m- in thn r.mmnil r%amhnwc . - 2. That the -City Clerk is directed to publish the following notice of hearing once at least 15 days prior to the public hearing in a newspaper KOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING -- FOR A HOUSING BOND PROGRAM NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Eagan City Council will meet in the s . s:__ City Hell 1982, and conduct a public hearing pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.01, et seg., as it relates to adoption of a Housing Bond Program for the City of Eagan. This program will describe the housing needs of the City and will describe a program for the issuance of housing revenue bonds to meet said needs and other matters required by Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 462C. Persons desiring to be heard on the proposed program may address the Council. Further information regarding the program will be available at the office of the City Administrator after . 1982. Adopted this 8th day of November, 1982. Attest: City Clerk M Mayor 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Fourteen L SETBACK VARIANCE - BRADLEY HANSON Bradley W. Hanson for a 10' Setback Variance to ConstFuct a Garage 20' from the Right -of -Way of a Public Street Located on Lot 22, Block 1, Wilderness Run 3rd Addition -- A public hearing y• was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their regular meeting held on September 28, 1982 to consider an application that was submitted by Bradley W. Hanson requesting a 10' setback variance to consider a garage 20' from the right-of-way of a public street. Questions were raised at that public hearing as to whether other variances have been granted in the area as they relate to front yard setbacks. Also, there was a concern about the attitude and "Position—of the adjacent -property -owners and it was recommended hataca petition ""-4- presented-or-neighbors be present to state their r < pinion;about,Mr�pHanson.'s_;proposed garage„addition.`-;,;,Therefore. n «s- �recommenai. 1."' -Enclosed on Mr. Hanson and until.�the_,,October ..26, ;;,1982 meeting at ,,which .s...reconsidered.;�The:,Advisory ;Planning -Com-; denial.,of the variance request to the 'City ages "4b through 4 3 is a copy of the 4Alsotenc�ed,is a copes a revised report through"46 '. Enclosed on page' ¢' is tes which pertain to this item. A pet- on -last Advisory Planning Commission meeting a copy of that document is enclosed on pages _ ,V&i Ot' „..ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or -deny the recom- mendation of the Advisory Planning Commission to deny the applica- tion as presented by Mr. Hanson. 39 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE _ APPLICANT: ''BRADLEY'W. HANSCN LOCATION: IAT 22, BIACR 1, WILoMoMS FDN 3RD ADDITiCNF. ra " 1281 VIIDMW DRIVE ` EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT) ° = DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 28, 1982 1110'DATE OF REPORT: ' SEPTEMBER 23, 1982 REPORTED BY. DALE C. KnaE, CI'T'Y PIANmm 10' vea an applica co from Mr. Hanson 'to see' if he could build a cja . rage 20' from the right-of-way vs. the 30' setback requiranent in an R-1 (Resi- 'q x�,3de[itiaT`Siiigle'District) : "Presently,- Mr: Hanson has a two -car garage construct- ed onstructed in a tuck under fashion presently existing on his single family hone. Mr. _`_Ha nson is wishing to convert a portion of this existing garage into a family man wand iecvnstnict)?the�Vtwo-car: garage 20' :ifram the right-of-way of a public street yYThe garage would then project 10 additional feet out into the front yard than ,,.what the garage presently - is now. In reviewing the site plan, if the portion of the garage is converted to a fargily roam, there would be no possible way the new �..w..�..garage could be attached to the side of the house. On the easterly side,, the applicant has the 10' side setback and 16' on the westerly side so there is no feasible way the garage could be attached to the side of the house. Staff has reviewed the applicant's request,and in the field inspection, all houses presently have a 30' setback to the house or the garage on Vildmark Drive. This request would then have one structure protruding 10' out in front of the rest of the houses on Vildmark Drive. In reviewing this application, there appears to be no physical or unique characteristics to this lot over any of the other lots with- in this neighborhood. Therefore, it appears that this request is in regard to an economic hardship which would allow Mr. Hanson to add additional square footage to his existing home and still allow him to have an oversized two -car garage. If approved, the variance should be subject to the following conditions: 1. All other ordinance requirements shall be met. DCR/jach .O • • a V JA..i Lr` a 'YYt O12536 1 LArH�_ - _ .an J OV TIOT Ct jt.:F Ry or 69c yo\�.� a o w ql ds.sr Bf.t a e�% net -)a n -a •_ Y " - _� m IS ^ of � 't' �O ?_O.91 I• > ' X194 ,• 3 b rve,s 7� _ w+.rG O� SI m 3e x9 a.8 27 x6 + L I! 17 e w Ic .• QIU n.9s {y • D I I O t° rS '10'�V N +N 0 1 i 101- ,� V �, s u b £. •o, .' IY�. gT asst B .0 ` ��o rtB7 re FYI 0 3.] Bl ' i °. ).• yv I w 2 N 1� n61'ai s•7 >+ .• .' •• 19 a � � z3 ? ~v� 81 1 21 ZL 7 0S•at iu.a. I O is -sp wl 7•�t• so LT.11 TdP LB Su ryes 2v3. 111 _��•. wrf� r.P °� I - •1•Y'•f'. ut'I?•r ' mn. • B _ +,0 r `.-•ya..e..,... 589•a. 56'E9 r eu �r I . .. •.�a.WILD£RNESS'RVIV ROAD les.rB Toc•• f°�;,L•s+' m. .: � 191 '.IB1 r -"•IN a-....,.le[tl a hoe Oa BB 8a.00 N.!`.V:-• w {i �1 1�0 h ..tl n ` e� 2q e�':z's v w N ob I4 q e0 20 O: --- b - p E ES v 19,x' a 20; 1 r?�.6-•' v I St � IJ .)'/ � p a Py � .' •]+[Pof)' \� .InO ey r7 v . ) a1 +�fi ° m 7r i9e ley rof Bo B4 = or1 •e.ap ft liq• ijf '\ O ^0.1 rr:.., 7 s_s� /. ^s.•ss•' T, .�, r B9e r/° 18 9a- •11. ry a B - IJ 4td \y 1 19 ,0 e5w (M a 7e 7e •ee ay r � '! �O 0 .�I +ti -t7 toe Blt7 5 � ± IB y.. ,1!Y' �A`Ma me j o II �\;r 12�'' 7+ A,. ' 17.,r ` •O• `\ -�. § _ - �: a rr Q '16 •�'(0 .P S r 6 o .a .a ' •- y�S es' o' 10 i° 11 1! J s 17 !t: •OYSp` t •I?B �•+i A .BO If:� • $si Is6 t t.n e? % O It ��t0t' �p t s O K w•�y ♦ 1.1� ') 'F. '9 • M p `-plo i•' `b, b '% =4 •° .,.a;,;z,; • �C)°.o ; 'T+ : • * 16 I w w aS'" _Fi tJN ORIvL, O�..;a o*•° . Ifs ,af'lir �.�. =', rY1 -13 t. 'xs�3'"_R;e:7t M .M 'I7t 1f.•t°,�. M °T �sT• � JYre LAey s• , � �m At �tB^ f*•es £iv71 io'_ a \'` L ro + 1.1 12;- Cw 1e• �w u 2 _rY M 3..i"1 Js>o-... �ifr¢ e'T•.! 9 Y.eB�i. a... 14 .31 � t 1 „� , w - ,o ! 1°f•e! na.iY 7 e•S7 0 - IBl.26 - - )1B6.90 f8 rB'ef •'w { _'.-n[S�i •.. vPL �;: iso •rr.d_�. yy, / �," "- O -X "` •. �v'�r��'f �. ,�'•'e?a;s�tf�r e4'ti��". Kn"�sn*}�j��n. i''�r .i." 'L,{ �.�.v. xi t34., �.;,�.. t^ ... _ .»:: y'••�s7a-'-W;e-"�. ._..,..yam___:_ T Z.Z- •___._____ .._...._. 1 p0.E0 it. Y Ie Aft%A QA I- ARNOtO 3870 A r � 20 Aa a 5 b- 1 s lo' � ��5 O% Ii I LZ' Ff Z I •O -�-t=OFZaT��Cf--�13 L)E T TNEA— I I�. 4� m R-1 PF 0 0 I u'��—PIC VE A PF C -3 A R-1 ✓ a� Jam,? _"'NJ� •' �,.a PF Mrt/ -).�- i �_ ��J the' �•�T,��.i PARKVIEW � GOLF:;-y�..�..:J.j:JS.)+•J.j..�i'j%'�'=aJ: \ COURSE :;5 A J?. qF �T'3% r ,�) ). ♦)1 per. J ) r ) :)? I T I �, ) ; .i _if v J'..Ti+,•) 1 YJ r Y': )Jy yJ P K'to 0 0 TO: CHARLES HAIL„ CHAIRMAN AND THE ADVISORY PLANNING, COMMISSION FRCM: DALE C. RUNKIE, CITY PLANNER DATE:--riC TOBER 20, 1982 ' RE: ADDITIONAL, kMON FOR THE ( As directed at the September 28, 1982 Advisory Planning Commission, staff has 1 _.,,,..,researched the variances regarding the Bradley W. Hanson's request for a var- iance on Vildmark Drive. Attached is a memorandum from Mike Johnson, Planning J �a�. :,Intern, who has researched the variance files and parcel files in the City to determine the setbacks on lots surrounding Mr. Hanson's property. Attached is mennrandum for your review. ' -_Staff„hes ret prepared an additional report on the proposed variance request, w ;•,.�, ” please refer to, the .report in the September 28th Advisory Planning Con[nission � -.r .: packet�:for your review. If anyone has misplaced this particular staff report, �+. ��, �'� 'please feel free to contact me and we will mvide with that staff -.:+.�'�.r�,t•.?: ,r w-....�.e w.w:.,,:.-.7a-r�r..,, _.-. .. - .P YoU .Tep�rt' ,�. , 0,06t �':j' taf&is,�inat m ptooess. of.. scheduling the planned developnent review for Nover—. ber 30, 1982 'i November 30th is the 5th Tuesday of the month and staff is in- viting both City Council and Advisory Planning CaTmission. Please mark your " --'calendars accordingly for this special meeting. �V _�;-•:If�anyone �would like additional information regarding this packet or have ques- kfions agenda,' please feel free to oontact me at theC3.Hall. Si noerely, Dale C. Runkle City Planner =Ugg MWIN 4q FROM: PIrANNING INTERN JOHNSON Y M: -'VARIANCE - MR. BRADLEY W. HANSON Pursuant t0 your request, City staff has researched the iters In question re- "" x garding the 10' setback variance for Mr. Bradley Hanson. An investigation of this site and a review of our building inspector's files have produced the following information: :ir'xF _.: .+'-- >"• .-.- r DISTANCE FROYl GARAGE DISTANCE FROM ADDRESS LEGAL TO PROPERTY LINE GARAGE TO CDRB Dr. (Lot 24, WOL295 i lc3marlc Dr ' (Lot 25,; Block 1) 43 •err " �'7?q1-T:..,'h``. W?:S7e'i Wilderness Rum 3rd " !!! ! 10""!*JO Addition (Sec.27 •Q 44 5' , MC,.}N2--` 42.8' yv ' -44.7' 54.7' you,;ean=see..fron-this. data, :a 10' variance would result in the Hanson garage being located 21' from the property line and 34' from the curb. The proposed -;_ garage extension would also be located 8.7' closer to the curb than any of the others listed above. Staff also examined the variance file to determine if any other variances had been granted in this particular area. The only variance found in this area was a request by Mr. Arnold A. Carlson, 1295 Vildmark Dr., for a 26' side lot building variance (see attached). It was approved by both the Planning Commis- sion and the City Council. No additional variances were located in this area. Should you have any questions regarding this variance or would like further in- formation, please contact re. MJ/jack A -S' 43OTA $OUTH L/AIE 0i 5EIolr ww �% 571 L; yeb.o7 =5 1-07771 comP9Ny ASE/ryENj q�•p7 - -- _L 30 L z /Bs 7/ �a��Sa �'.:aiK. a ._�_L .�.: .ate'-.-••.-.••y _• t . t•. .• - _ - :. , _I. _. _.-�.._..: -.sem-;.._, 30 yb'•E /B/.7/ �•• t •• sum'_ t ! • tt� t : i 2 :+ 676.6= C p1of•8� �' ego, 2y-,.Z. \ ~ ° SB9°S9'6f'E I e.I7esf'/f - /iob oo � ,w.a•,;u ar:;, .:�•• 06.69 . ayi o \ : •, .4/?. CFi o a8788 84-00 _ f 70.89 g�i7 •A°e !f�C �q k mrxwe� a r _ _ ' • i�% o\ - Man na7 {� $ y°a o �bf y0 c W ,�j v •:bbe'/2 ,\ Ip C=Bld'/ ^ts 'A -t �. + -./e-off h - ' ,,; 4n •_ , yi:�h lIt t'�Rat' M h .i-�..§, tp7e.db d p1 i•,_al :'tom h Met, h $ - a SeufN L/A/Lr \N NOFryEBN STATES 24 19 a •a=12../7 ° .io •. �i p7 rb _- • c=7iys •.b •,�. N89 S9'SS N/ -a��) b4• .\1 � 9y y5_.•,d,,�°�°°�,��'evhq ' . e : )!.8 •'n'i �SL6B_•1s3�f'-`o 18ILDMA'RK - 0/ � ^ •a1��1' 7-67.oy /oo.ao=1. " � _ /00.00 _ YS.00 iB �. Vic. o. � \p i c 3 �1• �,. � i I ;o h 30 � � 11 �iy �� a•,,e �"k_ �y pD , �p5,4 ooby1°/ e � 8i �� u I eq=Q qy , �1166op5 �\ po ro. p1'.o 0 0 0 / .�' 't •1 - .{ e'\� \° R A rJ 6c,6 f i0 . •a�° • 3 0 ` ale° ? Q �" /n' \i �5•00� Q `* h�'4e •�e3 Z' 4° Al ti a /32.80 a �3. v•� y�� m'.^ / c 9'a4M1 � D \. I\ It13.0 o5•.E � � o0 3)y\)-. 7..2.3 / J_ F- o ? •o r \�n Co :E NBB S7•/V"E x-60i-'i rw �6� bT Oa d I NCO '] h b ae_ =yld; 1 �• erne. O=30o" V I O an p 13 .71 /to V V �~ o 3 5p0 e IS %g00ti� \ r a ni >r3 Nt�2:. °�56 g!P / Y� �J6 •ss f'v-=;',•fi5 ,�a 3 z �B0 C, �°�;1\8wf3_oryLA'� 9/ oa 14 Bs 1B.*�• c'S• ZOS.00 /62.00 96.90 .... $EC. 27- T-7.\/-223 (/ Q'�C- 4� C7 APC Minutes October 26, 1982 BRADLEY HANSON Chairman Krob then reconvened the public hearing regarding the applica- - ticn"of Bradley W. 'Hanson for variance on Lot 22, Block 1, Wilderness Run 3rd Addition, 1281 Vildmark Drive, to construct a garage 20 feet from the right- of-way of a public street with a 10 foot setback variance. Mr. Hanson was present and submitted a petition from neighboring property owners who had "'Opposed the project at the last meeting and now appeared to favor the project. _ ..,He stated that he had met with each of them individually and none of them had objections. He claimed economic hardship in that it is not practical to expand his house to the rear because of the steep terrain in that direction. There were questions from Planning Commission members concerning the appear- ance in relation to other homes in the area and the possible concern of neighbors that the addition will generally conform but it appeared that peti- - mo=tioning neighbors desired to have the application conform with the ordinance -,generally accepted orisat•-least_-conform _•with-' enerall ted standards in the area. 4 Mr. _Hanson stated gn1ingrease.in,family size and more room needed are reasons for the expansion, and..,alsoeto.. improve ..the aesthetics of -the home. i<Member Mulrooney " questioned whether -:there was only -convenience -or whether there was any actual `the ?r", 'hardship to applicant and stated '.'that'it did not appear that there was an ''actual hardship __After discussion, Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the . 1 of on -£'moo ecommend_denial.of41be.application because of.lack of hardship 'shown, according to Ordinance standards for variance purposes from existing setback requirements. There_was.clear concern among Planning Commission bens Whehe tr the neighbors continued to object, in light of the wording on the consent petition. Member Wold stated the land was not conducive to add -� a• -.the addition to the rear and it would a _ .��„�„_��_,�__ appear to be Pair to the applicant to r,,,-4 _, ,, _ ollow the construction oa *the"front'side of the house. Those in favor were ;aRr�Mulrooney, Wilkins, Turnham and Krob. Those against were Wold, Bohne and McCrea. ADJOURNMENT McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to adjourn at 8:10 p.m. Secretary 4-7 3 PHH 0 0 Dom. as ig�a ZIO 4 /a 77 dd.0;..�1cor Yfa J.�& 7F % ko_ ZY/V . W.&IIET-1 ...�cS'•�"`W' Irv!!.! //L-�!2i�i�\i(i.V ,' 'if�'iJ�� ✓r s��/ L�-�!�ZZ%�'G�_/ ....... m *0 0 is . W.&IIET-1 ...�cS'•�"`W' Irv!!.! //L-�!2i�i�\i(i.V ,' 'if�'iJ�� ✓r s��/ L�-�!�ZZ%�'G�_/ ....... m *0 0 is 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Fifteen TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS - COUNTRYSIDE BUILDERS B. Temporary Advertising Signs for Countryside Builders, Inc. ^^�='=-Countryside -Builders, Inc., has requested temporary advertising signs to be located at six (6) locations throughout the City for the purpose of advertising Oakwood Heights which is located on Wilderness Run Road. The applications were reviewed by the Building Inspection Department and appear to be consistent with the intent of the sign ordinance. For a copy of the sign locations and a picture of the sign, refer to pages $1 through """ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the tem- m+�PorarY 'Advertising signs for Countryside Builders 'Inc.,to be issued in accordance with the sign ordinance. . iHab:A's:GGI:VG,YF�Ak..li.�-re�ra• ':;s.rr.-w � ...., .._. .. ..u.aD+...=oMus+....+ -. -... — ,. .. - sv i7vA.}i:.r•,�'"�.;dFkF.c'ax;:r 4..—�^=r�er.'�;.._n+..T._:K'ww �d+ij•t:�r:_ni :5.; . 0 SIGN LOCATIONS Temporary Advertising Signs SW Corner of Pilot Knob & Cliff NW Corner of Hwy. 3 s Cliff SW Corner of Lexington & Wilderness Run . NW Corner of Dodd 6 Wilderness Run. NW Corner of Cliff & Dodd ' - SE Corner of Dodd S County Road 30 0 4' x 8' 2 sided 4' x e' 2 sided 4' x 4' 2 sided' 4' x 4' 2 sided 4' x 4' 2.s ide.d i 4 x 4' 2 sided tt 2 L \� ..r- . (DIFFLEY ROAD) a""� '" COUNTY ROAD 30 M WILDERNESS RUN .Wj X Ck s CLIFF ROAD SI 0 r PRO - Painter will do "sanething" with arrow, mi.lage, and phone! Signs at SW Corner of Lexington & Wilderness Run NW Corner of Dodd & Wilderness Run NW Cozner of Cliff & Dodd SE _Corner of Dodd & County Road 30 . Will have the layout shown above. - Signs at: SW Corner of Pilot Knob & Cliff NW Corner of Hwy. 3 7 Cliff Will have the layout shown above with the addition of "Manor Homes/ Townhomes For Sale - 2 & 3 Bedroom, etc." sk 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Sixteen LONE OAK HEIGHTS PRELIMINARY PLAT EXTENSION C. Lone OakHeights, Consideration of Preliminary Plat Extension (Orrin Aune`)_ ==-'As the Council may recall, on October 19, the final plat for the Lone Oak Heights Addition was formally revoked by Council action due to the developer's non-compliance with the re- quired financial guarantees. It appears that the developer is still unable to secure the necessary financial guarantees required by the City. Therefore, enclosed on page ,S9- is a written request submitted by the developer asking twat Eris preliminary plat approval be extended for a six month period of time until April 5, 1983. Also enclosed on page 5 S is a layout of the �'_'>•preliminary plat. The original prelim na�lat was" approved by Council action on April 20, 1982 with the final plat receiving approval on August 17 and ultimately being revoked on October 19, 71 j1982: fherefore;4-in accordance -twith present City ordinances, if he mfinal.;:plat,4is..not .approved "within six months of preliminary MR11at pprovals44the ..preliminary : plat is null.and void unless an tension1 s'gr""anted-'by :Council -;action yACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the e.quessvorasix month ,extension to the Lone Oak Heights preli- minary plat. ' 53 ��0 0 JW dwedern �saocaafes o/ Ch. 9../ pp1410 -r.., 04� 2d. ✓//`..,sola 55125 452-6464 :..,;..H.r, Mr. Thomas 4. Colbert, P. E. Director of Public Worcs „City of Eagan 3995 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minn 55122 - :” ' Re: Lone Oak Heights .:;�+ .: G ++R r�-_.-�Hvrikve c''t•S� �..�. , rte.. r- sma•� .+-`.L"1 � Fro�.� ..+i _+r�.ii r�a��_ Dear Mr. Colbert : �.. r5 T ould ylike ..to request that our preliminary plat approval be',dxtended for 6 -month period of time, to allow us to comply with the financial requirement that was set on August 17, 1982, by the Eagan City Council. K,,lwould also like to confirm o-ar phone conversation � .r on Oct. 29, 1982 pretaining to the abandonment of the well located on the.Lone.oak Heights project. Please be. a - informed that we have contracted with Keys Well Drilling Co. of St. Paul to accomplish the abandonment of the well. <...�..«•..sdr z^i;K}o-'xi-;4}1'4•..'-�:• ,,.. ,, ,...w°'k'•-rg�$a�..fr�Yr iter.+•. -i ;.��ey�>, .'=". _ -. .. .6 .: _. Midwestern Associates of St. Paul, Inc. Orin Aune President kka s4 �'�•• .r4 0 1' �•`Y Ali LONE OAK HEIGHTS 4. ' 1 til i, nje •'e7C .. 1 Alt • B --" _ ?;:.7i1' C (-- • i, E%e CEYi3 `Np ! [-�„o"¢ wr NAJ —� ,.i: 'Y ._::.:�.•. . .... •? •'. w,er� `w•diiir�i� -. •gNiTe e••E �'E j"v et o. •. I y I E • `' �Y • ".. •• . 'tet OU , o f •\i O ; 1 4 �•♦ OUTLOT� '�\ t, t,•,�r_i: N t%-bi»,Ao'A;I•- ', ..,...•, .. A. � • @.,—''ice:• .. ��, ' �' .,rte '� ptoe Ai 'P•., . Y. y I u Mw YWIf»011W'TWIAuy..M.s\\y m bo 0 , r EXCEPTTION, `C aS IH �A ON, wool .} i e.•.eAn,1, A. 11 F r . «.�.,.InwrAesvirj 1 ••. S e i alley R LAKE, erlay Co., Inc. :1 AAIEp LAKE, YAp[70TA j v tiv" �5r • A m y�a • VOL r. 91 ,.sN • t. H e LL oo ie C EXCEPTION NO 2 uO Cr y IZ e31 .6 i� •• jj S 3 T o L, wl ' b )I 2 OF 2 SHEETS . 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Seventeen HILLTOP OF EAGAN FINAL PLAT D. Hilltop of Eagan, Consideration of Final Plat Approval (Develo- "per's 'Construction) -- The Public Works Department has received an application for final plat approval for Hilltop of Eagan (former- ly Hilltop Condominiums). All conditions placed on this plat at q� :the time of preliminary plat approval have been complied with and this final plat is now in order for formal consideration by Council action. All required bonds, applications fees and final plat material have been reviewed and approved by City staff. Enclosed page —Z is a copy of the final plat. ,?�7a-r��Y--ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the final . plat for Hilltop of Eagan (Developer's Construction) and authorize _,..,_plat a' "` the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents for re - co ding'=at"`Dakota County •o^e�Rs�gNW4x��...l..i�Sh{� l�A �F'Ir !. 1MTS M �- - 1:I -. ] &�7 .. 7 .•flRJCww+.rJh�/iol'A.w��up :+�.... ....�_-r-4=�s:: •.�.�— .. 5(� I -.... HILLTOP 4'•4 `•\ •Yxl,•.IY. LN NUUI 11 b• NNNN� � r •I •IY•I.. i%•�✓1 I Ya I, 111MIW 11 .II II. YN IN. I �. • Y••1 11.1.1.1.. Ial1� 1� ...1.1, ..rv.r� I•Ix... I �, Aqui UI W I- S l9 W D. F - j J .z F Y •w •u• •j ••. x913 I. i O • IwIN •L .IL b YNC[ Be /' W 1 . LI • �f1•�•W �wY1fW Z Q 1 J j ' I 1 r•rwll.BIl 1 r •GI...1-Qai _Y �1 1• ...0 • '-tia•.in•1- � • \ j•1 LL � S�•I.. u e OUTLOT r A I 6 p L 1,1 r\ � •f1 / I. 'zy\\\` es `' 1,:'4.1. J __�• I :� . -l�.i.•[ -S - �`�n •... n1 it I I xrx. K .r l.t• 1 t. •�`' wo �L§CI I �I I a - - o �L� 1 CI i Yr ;LL .Y Y mOI RYMr[,• T.1 r••:......: •1•n C1, !• r • nlnu •r• r rr`�A GSA I�r �' , t.q. Ily. r.. y!. ., Y. 1.11r4�.. 4N. .,aY.rlf 4 I�J�-. A rf Y•tl• w IhY [f Y:w•1.1; y .1 , 5�P 1, 4 W 11. pm 11 u[ calla C. Lllt[.r Y1nW. • unN Y . .[.[ rin Y n•,. S Z. Y 11[1 L U YNI 1• \M 4114 f . q InaOq Mua H.ny. I,nu•1•. 1 ` i '�" OCATION MAP W W1I ...........w. fu w 491x, .. numr or mY. w Ix. M.N I tt/ 1314 YL Ir:ya•.Ir Y• W1 r h11•111 y 11.1... 4 . I.. 111.1 M II<11. I.L 11, pairs- YYyy N. .wy.n., r Yrn r 1l l.nila 1x Ya1Y • .1.11 1.1x. •11, 1 Ylbx.. n M1r In.ny1 al, llp .n.^..• • • . 141 r i.bl 4 f • :M Yu.Y. 1. wa. L.wN Y .1x1. , . . �'fn.• Y.1. I'tiY Y •1114 J .Mro1 a[ my txulhll L 1 • w u. Yeymly, W � ?ii y� uM wa Y..• nu..;. 1. Y Ig1I N u r 1 .;rl.;x'..i w ...Nrm ..1 1. • 1 l LLr1 91n..I 911..11 r u _ (�1••. �(.{ 1 wy awlwur Y.. b.. �� '1 �f , �IIMy .1y I j • a./ Yw 111. MN..0 p ~ Yu u.Y. [ •b 1.. n l l{1 LR4V 1xx111 YWY. •. •• I.f Y1n.0 Q.. q 1f- n.:Y1Y\N WaI1rw1 w uYx.aw bbn r 1M1 r \ 1 'YY 11 -i`1r.r I-�., .1 x.111 r.1 I.... 111.11 nl• 1 PLI Yu.11a olflur. 1 • MYrra Y3 L... 1 ....• yy f 4 1 Yw a. YryralY..• 11naf W 1n. .IY.nlly, 1{. i_ 5 w r.Ly1ry ) ( If GrN.x• nPm 9.61 NNL Yry Ir) : Wa Lax.1.1 w Mx1M IY Y•Ixa . xa y . 1• .IY x xILN1 y Y3Y. y JI. IYI InI H 1 1 • r 1 rnm..l lW 1. 1n. LY... n1f .: 1bb1n .. xrmin.'i•. MI • n Il 1 In Y•11M xu,r...... ln..f f I. ... .. . r ...... 1 .n11..^. 1• ' ` Y .. Y.1 IM .w.ui Iwxl.r IYn x • m;r L...na 1 Ica..I 1Y1U e1My. 1. Y fn1YYY .inn .w �1 •i YI • L .. YM lu. Y 1 M )Y\ ICWMI. Y r [I nYbn 1. Ufl if If by 1. n. ` ilenlf 191.1 li. Y\1Yy.�a. I Ir „(J 1 YI Y nm[) YUlfr .MI r 1U W If . 11�. m1 L111 ..-it .f WY: uwwYY t , ]f �r U1nu1 4.11.1. Cllr 0•w11 .r YIY. a -NY ��al ili I {{ Jji 'rtlr 01.1. F •:. •: `� 1 : Iu..NM .. C r..r Iu. Y.. r Yw.•4. 4911. w Y. u... I.-,, axuww na w11u., PONDto �r W. 114 Y. 1W g1.IrJ IW ply 11 . u _. -x- 'A. A_ S 7(' } ly. n..[. W..1. c-11 11.1 \ y 1 � n11 II•f M IILL10r r W Y Y. yrnry rV..1. \. Y1n., . 1P4.4..1. tn.'l.r 101 1 ra n L� t � 1 1. \M W..1• C.w. Lyl..w. .111 W11x1. 1M I.r.•.[ . r xlally .r n 1x 11 Lw•11.1..1 r. :� Jij'[ 4 Ir Y.m Cly1. •)w . 1 YI.r r.unl .r .Y L.N . . � I•. .;_�. 11� Cr_ r i llll• _�i 1 h. 91...41_._ \� . •r t� •A". tii (I 1rfw. e..nY r.y e3.n.r Y..r n ( Y YIINy.11Y1 M W Uwfn _. Uj e.wy Iwun, W.... c•wy, Y ..1. � • f1 1 in;;r n`bird ..n.s_.` of ` :�;;:.i"_�i..n;na Yr4 :w`.rinLA u xl .� �j?i. ��'�a�•r.. �i <. !� L.y.r .... N... W.... [.y... Y...... • I � .w...x1...w.wa � I � � ` �- I `� ��Irsl• _ , f j .� 91x1 n•I � - � � I I � �,.- 3 �� •�, HI I. LTO? L.STATE S ' � ppl' Otl•li tl'Y 'I �:.h.. COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY N0. 30 (UIFFLEY ROAD) - ub.•a41: -� - - _ I DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS, INC.' 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Eighteen RICHARD HALLADY BUILDING PERMIT E. Richard Hallady Concerning a Building Permit Application for -'a—Detached'-Storage Building -- Mr. Hallady, who presently, owns Roadway Custom Trailers located at 3248 Terminal Drive, ha's made a building permit application and is proposing to construct a secondary building consisting of approximately 2,000 square feet for the storage of scrap material. In reviewing the application-, it was determined that the lot coverage requirements are not in conformance; and, therefore, a variance is required for considera- tion by the City Council. The City Planner has examined the x5_ _.building permit application and a copy of his findings.and a loca- 3uNtion map are .enclosed on pages _through 6Z for review. --`-'`ACTION TO -BE CONSIDERED -ON 'THIS -ITEM: To approve or deny the .tb9i�ldingTpermit�!variance concerning minimum lot coverage as applied q�r; byjMr. THallady x.atea�3_��i�.�Sa'GYi�?p �fi-�.;+,'�"'es ri-s3f3e2 �'eaS�w� r+41��rc+-.•,.'3. ._t+ - = _lut4ataw.4w'::s�5�'RftJ19RJ.ef.» .Xn ci'v .. _o t.i nnz::-. .. WE • • 1�1•C Y • •. 1 � •• FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: yNOVFMMER 4, 1982 RE: BUILDING PERMIT AUTHORIZATION -..." Staff has received an application for a building permit by Mr. Halladay who presently owns Roadway Custom Trailers located at 3248 Terminal Dr. Presently, Roadway Custam Trailers has a 10,320 square foot building and it wi is proposing to construct a secondary building consisting of approximate- 'ly 2,000 square feet for the storageI —.,,.._-._.Understanding that the building would be pole material. It st staff s g pole building or steel build- ing located at the northerly edge of the lot. In calculating the exist g building and the proposed building, the lot coverage is approximately. -. IDMT 16$;'1or under the minima lot, coverage requirement in an industrial dis- �_ concern staff has is in regard to the secondary building for the stor v tr age of materials._. -The ordinance isn't specifically clear in regard to wissuing%pemiits•for,nca:t than one building per lot. Therefore, for clar- ification, staff would like �. the permit to be authorized by the City Coun- . - cil instead of -'staff-issuing the building permit. - - -- - --- --- -�: As you may be aware, there is a substantial amount of outside storage in ';rscy this.,general„area and the industrial park does not meet the regnirements -"mss ' : " .` set forth in Ordinance #52 in regard to lands g in , concrete curbing, " ..'"bituminous surface or driveways and' parking areas, etc. Therefore, in is- suing the building permit, would the applicant have to adhere to the land - m... .scape requlranents, concrete curbing, etc. or can the permit be issued be- cause the proposed building is helping to clean up the area by putting scrap materials inside of a building rather than storing the materials out- side? Staff is asking for direction from the City Council either to issue or not issue the proposed building permit for the storage building which would contain approximately 2,000 square feet. DCR/jach M 2 -Lw L c 0LL L) U-. J V 4 L, m ME -JTq 57- �T ILr tca$ Ic Fiw- 2 -Lw L c 0LL L) U-. J V 4 L, m ME 41 .:9 ~- :1• R-4� bel• � /iRl M R-4 YYY /r AL LI A -FOX . _;J A - ti�• ` A R-4 N 8 EADO IIstM. /y --� sl MINA LI eU IA Ll E r R-4� /iRl R-4 a LI A -FOX . +� ti�• .� R-4 J. NF _r R Vhl R- I i TA K/00 ADDITION A R -4 I c - 4 RA ►0 OWN 4 1 OW21 N 1; 01! 0 I 0 R-16��N'� R-2 .4, 1' ELmN F")F/,m DG R-4� /iRl R-4 a -FOX . RIDGE ` A R-4 N 8 N drYA 0 R-16��N'� R-2 .4, 1' ELmN F")F/,m DG 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Nineteen SWIMMING POOL ORDINANCE F. Consideration of a Swimming Pool Ordinance -- At the direction 'bf -the --City "Council, the City staff, under the guidance of the City Administrator and research by the Administrative Intern, Mike Johnson, developed a swimming pool ordinance for consideration. The swimming pool ordinance, a copy of which is enclosed on pages _6Ar through 6q , provides regulatory control over private swim- ming pool construction. It also addresses the issue of water run- off from swimming pools to adjacent neighbors which was the concern originally raised by a property owner before the City Council. Public swimming pool construction is generally regulated by the = State Building Code. --`The swimming pool ordinance has been reviewed by the Chief Building Inspector,., City !,Planner ,sand Assistant City , Engineer and .it .meets iSith_;their:,approval.;If the ordinance is to be further considered by-t.athe.eCi•ty.*Council,m the .;City Attorney should provide review and urther Input %�,*Dave Keller -of the City Attorney's office has stated that, --as -"an alternative to an ordinance, it appears that the pro- perty owner next to property with a swimming pool which drained cros.ssithat neighboring property would have an action for trespass and/or damage to property. This type of action would be initiated by the adjacent property owner and apparently could be enforced L'N if a swimming pool ordinance is not adopted. , k T- ACTION TO or deny an posed with BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To either review, approve ordinance regulating swimming pool construction as pro - or without modification. G3 • DRAFT • CITY OF EAGAN DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE REGULATING SWIMMING POOL CONSTRUCTION :,,The City Council of the City of Eagan, Minnesota ordains as follows: SECTION 1. "SWIMMING POOL" DEFINED. =as vzffi --:. `',n'A. PRIVATE SWIMMING POOLS are regulated by this Ordinance and are defined as follows: Any enclosure, designed or intended or used for the con - a " .&ivtainment of water, whether constructed below ground level or above ground - J rra -fRRi4'.�:rri'�.sJ#d- C. t•3•• -=Y`-. 3.,."^Nr4r a -•".a:.. �: ,i. :.x.y '`3 V'a...r'_i-li" N- : .• tau leveling -A' ace area exceeding 100 square feet and a depth ex- sS.�_ y � y _= ce ding 18 inches} which is designed, intended, or used for swimming, 'ac�tu�nw'-y•�:i',S°�".::vC'fv.'�ii�'ae"s:.a-.-�"�, wading, or other recreational use by the owner or tenant of the property '$!f�L'str4�kr.A'-ib..-5i^iaaTs.,n ;^'v'.'--- . .....:.. .. .. ... upon wihhich,nthe pool is constructed, or by their family or invited guests without„payment -of.a fee. 3D1B PUBLIC SWIMMING POOLS are those available to the public at large, or used collectively by numbers of persons for swimming or bathing and which are operated by any person, firm or corporation, whether he or it be owner, lessee, operator, licensee, or concessionaire. Pcols in the following locations are considered public: 1. School property. 2. Hotels and motels. 3. Hospitals and institutions. 4. Municipal parks or buildings. S. Apartment buildings and multiple dwellings. 6. Country Clubs. All structures, appurtenances, equipment, appliances, and other facilities 44 11 • appurtenant to and intended for the operation and maintenance of a swimming pool shall be considered a part of a public swimming pool. SECTION 2. PURPOSE OF ORDINANCE. The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide minimum standards to safeguard life, health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location and maintenance of all swimming pools within the City of Eagan, and certain equipment specifically regulated herein. SECTION 3. ENFORCEMENT OF ORDINANCE. The City Code Enforcement Officer shall be charged with the enforcement of this Ordinance. - - j•.,,, -,SECTION 4. BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED. • w�};;a:q.•�.u-•+6::,8, -,.,,w^,;:=1rst ooLalning a permit rro ,O , , BThe application' for the permi istructed or`established,'and no such mmenced in the City of Eagan, without r:�-t-+- -: t-. :-;-, a iia:. J-• ,.- m the "Building Inspector. t shall include, without limitation, r the following information: ti 1. Complete plans and specifications for the construction of the , 2. A site plan showing the location of all structures on the lot, - including the house, garage, fences, trees, overhead or under- ground wiring, utility easements, and other significant im- provements or natural features; 3. The proposed location of pumps, filters, electrical power source (if applicable), flushing and drainage outlets, and other operations features; 4. Source of water supply; 6S 0 0 S. Location and specifications of protective fencing; 6. Other data as may be reasonably required by the Chief Building Official. C. The Chief Building Official shall have authority to inspect any pool at any reasonable time during the construction and thereafter to etermine whether or not the provisions of this Ordinance are being complied with. The Chief Building Official shall have the authority to enter upon any premises at reasonable times to inspect work per- formed under permits issued by him. �LL��SECTION 5. REQUIREMENTS. ' 5.1. All Districts. . :with'jArticle 680 of the current.national.-e 95" G•rn.Re,':+,tt' n3 uta � v4^ , f�' �ry I:;' AM�,* •k� !n k +iti:41' 1'.f� r�Gi �tr�.irk^'n „iSJ c Y I P ��t ^a;,7igl, B allo pool shall be located within any public or private utility ease 2 r'AA\H,NT M•%y . `}�e:3M$ 4!F ✓TG u F_. - i �nt,wall�way, sngress „or egress easement, .drainage ;way, marsh, or „other location_in,which_it will represent a threat to the natural location „ _ -. environment. - ��i C In the case of underground pools, precautions shall be taken during construction toe 1. Avoid damage, hazards or inconvenience to adjacent or nearby property. 2. Assure that proper care shall be taken in stockpiling excavated material to avoid erosion, dust or other infringements upon adjacent property. D. All access for construction shall be over the owner's land and due care shall be taken to avoid damage to public streets and adjacent private or public property. The owner shall be liable for damages caused to any public or private property. E. To the extent feasible, back-flush water or water from pool drainage W shall be dieted onto the owner's property Pinto approved public drainage ways and shall not drain onto adjacent private land. Drainage onto public streets or other public drainage ways shall require permission of the appropriate local City officials. F. Pool lighting shall be directed toward the pool and not toward adjacent - ��property. G. The pool area shall be enclosed with fencing to effectively prevent --the entrance of children and be without hand or foot -holds that would enable a child to climb over it. The fence shall be at least four (4) •q:rrp'rentW iw5fg-.:.rt{}Y4:.....;:: sr. - . in height, but not exceeding six(6) feet, to prevent uncontrolled -�eL W_l.TH'..c.KKjy M=3�'•Hf A!3"Y al.� - .4 ..: i. .. -. � .. � .. .. access from the street or adjacent property. Such fence shall have closing and self latching gates with provisionsforlocking and a. r T,j 4i'(- •47g -. c.a 'i' �� t .. -- �e. ..i .e C -y4� s ._1 .be completely installed prior to the filling of the pool.-.aq, s .l \ . n . �,i?-","""S " ,s'eYf ate landscaping sfiall be placed between Ae pool area and adjacent ' e; 8 fly.,district Jot lines H. Retaining walls shall be designed to resist the lateral pressure of '-,""the retained material in accordance with accepted engineering practice. ,n,.,F'�r{'{•4r.-„4 iF,{ tyu LL•. T. r' 4-4:, flt .' "^{5;. - ... Walls retaining drained earth may be designed for pressure equivalent ---,to that exerted by a fluid weighing not less than thirty pounds per cubic foot and having a depth equal to that of the retained earth. I. Filling of pools from fire hydrants or other public facilities shall not be allowed by local city officials. J. Pool water shall be maintained in a suitable manner to avoid health hazards of any type. Such water shall be subject to periodic in- spection by the local health officer and/or the Minnesota State Board of Health. K. All electrical wiring, installation of heating units, grading, instal- lation of pipes and all other installations and construction shall -4- G7 0 0 meet state requirements and shall be subject to inspection. L. Nuisances such as undue noise, lighting of adjacent property, health and safety hazards, damage to nearby vegetation and the like shall not be permitted. — ,M. --Any proposed deviation from these standards and requirements shall require a variance in accordance with normal zoning procedures. 5.2. - A. Pools shall not be located within five (5) feet of any rear lot line or within five (5) feet of any side lot line nor within seven (7) feet of -'{yw.�.,+rtyr, o.w'r -r, span •f}+s e.-:-.........o'zJ. - - . t- - .. .. _.... _ any principal structure or frost footing. Pools shall not be located rrF..� i uts � 1 � :.+.y:. �rr� --•cwe++id��v�w� t s-Ccit�r =, . _ - tl M�Sr'KX+'+ Z%-! ;T� .}5r- s':,,?_. �^'i -... r- ....+ ...,G."- -. .yct_'-I. .. _ Y -,t, -�'. r = B ^dThf*bunt, pump, heating unit "and any other noisemaking mechanical equipment shall be located at least fifteen (15) feet from any adjacent or W -V i`'f�`:ii:�1^oc � ,:wn t9! v+b.• .._ . .... x. .., r•v . -. - .. ... M ",IL? -4:O' -:T - nearby residential structure and not closer than five (5) feet to any 1 ' �°a�'�i `�r_al'a'1t,xr B',c;.,✓. a; ry ., i . _F :. r.�� ti . lot line. 5.3. Swimming pools which are intended for and used by the occupants `"7z._s of a multi -family dwelling and the guests of the occupants of such dwelling shall adhere to the following regulations: .«.:.- A. No part of the water surface of the swimming pool shall be closer than ten (10) feet to any lot line. B. No pumps, filter or other apparatus used in connection with or to service a swimming pool shall be located closer than ten (10) feet to any lot line. C. All deck areas, adjacent patios or other similar areas used in con- junction with the swimming pool shall be located at least ten (10) feet from any lot line in an adjacent single-family district. D. Fencing and landscape treatment shall be placed between swimming pool structure and adjacent single family lot lines. SECTION 6. COMPLIANCE WITH MOST STRINGENT REQUIREMENT. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this ordinance and any state law or requirement, rule or regulation of the State Department of Health, the provision imposing the higher standard or more stringent requirement shall be controlling. „•.;SECTION 7. PENALTY. Any person convicted of violating any provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine not to ex- ceed $500 or imprisonment for not more than 90 days, or both, plus the cost of r r prosecution in either case. SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from ��+and arter'its'passage and publication''according to�law°"�'`''�'"�"f"�=^-'r'�'''g ="'�"• �" " ' .u. .•. i..s.. «rn .. '" 7Y �'�".Sfa`e�a,.:enG�':s._... R ni tr� r � '�:i.iF�i-� �� •.ri i ' f• � yY � .�' i d W . T •AI'n f�Ji.' .. � .(. :'��' ],� • .�.•-{ 1w�r:r 'Passed by Ehe City Council this _ day of 1982. %�'. ,. rj :h+'S}'�•M '. '� `t, 41 jiti:.� i1"arT4`.'�e. aj..h J. �i�{ w-. it T'^"�FFt��~Y{h�iy�}`�.SSL>'ir ,�. .i, 'x-11, A:�c = :.•ii��..ry�t7 -e _ . 'r� • 1 vJ �, 4 (Yyl3htre.fnn4 t!hy.r*fl'E.cd•�1"'7.4r,.aY'. �5.7P�r Mi'� f'k� C� Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Twenty C ADDITIONAL ITEMS CONTRACT 82-13 BIDS A. Contract 82-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Brittany 4th & Safari Reservoir Watermain) -- Contract 82-13 incorporated the two following projects under one contract for bidding purposes: ,_. 1. Project #364, Brittany Fourth Addition - Trunk Water Main x ,.,,:2...Project #366-I, Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir - Water ,- Main _ w: •.:,,. - Enclosed on page -71 is the final bid tabulation as received at the formal bid ope nin g held on October 27, 1982. The alternate ..,bid ; rovided ,for-Itadditional-tgrading -subject oto :the -acquisition of„sementsfrom .the property owner in Apple Valley which will provide-•.for=--a-better access grade and road construction to the reservoir prior ..to the installation of this watermain. The City .4`ofEagan "has since been able to acquire at no cost the temporary construction easements from the property in Apple Valley to accommo- da.t6�. his•nbetter.construction access road. The Public Works Depart- 'ment feels strongly that this alternate bid should be considered due.¢;to,,,,i_ts M, better ,accessibility and minimal future maintenance resulting from better drainage designs and gentler access slopes. As can be seen, the low alternate bid is well below the feasibility r•r.r +.report .estimates ^for both.projects. K�W,-'”±ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 82-13 and award the contract to Encon -Utilities, Inc. in the alternate bid $68,367. VAE E Our File No. 49262 BRITTANY 4TH PROJECT 364 SAFARI 4.0 M.C. RESERVOIR TRUNK WA'rFR MAIN 82-13 EAGAN, MN BID TIME:10:30 A.M. C.DA:.T. BID DATE:Wed. Oct. 27, 1982 CQUrRACI'ORS ALTERI>II'1TE BID -1. Encon Utilities Inc. $ 68,367.00 2. Erickson Construction Inc. 76,755.00 3. ' ` En rin 14mtganeiy, `Inc. -'"' ` "` 78.430.00 4. Widmer Brothers 88,448.00 -m1AA.-,WRighar4.Knutson1 A=. w:, r-iomM, 460.00 r� a.. TOTAL BASE BID $67,227.00 73,460.00 75,880.00 81,398.00 ',,106,210.00 = ry M Bid - _ yv�Y 140 Bid ENGINEERS ESTIMATE $77,000.00 r� '�''..u� ✓1`y- 'ti.... �ef�P*�4lTi'.:�4.A� ?l Y''�i 3=rc"4 ..� : r�r.� f,'. _ .— - .. - ,h+t ^FEASIBILITY R1 PORTiF.R.) '`='" I[IV BID 8 OVER (+) (Alt) UNDER (-) F.R. Project 364 $32,230 Project 366-I 48,615 U 2369b %1 $24,210.00 44,157.00 24.9% (-) 9.2% (-) 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Twenty -One CONTRACT 82-14 PLANS & SPECS B. Contract 82-14, Approve Plans & Specifications, Order Advertise- ment for "Bids '(Project 366 -II, Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir) Detailed plans and specifications have been completed and are now being presented to the City Council for their review and approval. While Contract 82-13 provides for the access roads and the trunk water main to the site, Contract 82-14 provides for the construction of the reservoir facility itself. The contract proposal is being set up to provide an alternate bid the inclusion of the lettering "EAGAN" to be painted on this reservoir in three places. The Coun- cil may want to consider between now and the bid opening if they �- want to include this identification lettering on this large reser-' voir at the Eagan/Apple Valley border. The lettering would be similar to that recently •a�pplied to the Univac 0.5 M.G. elevated ROW- �k4-n9.KKi�4�ni%GFv clnR�•�:ar1d< .r: ta::.a.�- w!:�.Y ua y.. +.�+� _ •..wi�.�._r ... ..: oACTION :TO,aBE -CONSIDERED - ON -TRIS -ITEM =To approve "the plans and rr'-specifications for Contract 82-14 (Safari 4.0 M.G. water reservoir) and _order advertisements for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 m. ,on Thursday, December 2, .1982. .�•1(AW. aL1.Y. i'I: i'r4l'� 4i 5V — . •J. SAFARI ROAD ACCESS AGREEMENT C. Approve Joint Use Agreement for Road Access, Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir -- Enclosed on page 7S is a copy of any agreement -a s „executed by the owners of the property in Apple Valley adjacent ,:•,. ..to.the City of Eagan's access road to the 4.0 M.G. water reservoir. Rather than construct two parallel access roads to adjacent proper- ties, these property 'owners have requested consideration. by the. City of Eagan of joint use of the reservoir access road to their property. These -are the property owners who have granted a tem- porary construction easement. to the City to provide a better access road as discussed under the contract award for 82-13. In considera- tion for granting the easement and assuming maintenance responsi- bilities for this access road, they would like to receive permission from the City of Eagan to use this as access to their property. The Public Works Department has reviewed this request and prepared the referenced agreement for formal Council consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a joint use access agreement for the City's 4.0 M.G. Safari Water Reservoir road and, if approved, authorize the Mayor & City Clerk to execute said agreement. �a 0 0 AGREEMENT • 7• N• I• 11 � It 17 :-YYp\ TEIIS AGREE 4NT, made and entered into (/(-c Gr ( e-f� Z , 19 J °by•and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a municipality of the State of Minnesota (herein - 'after called the CITY), and P11KE AND SHIR= PATTEN, husband and Wife (hereinafter called the FEE OWNERS). WEA , it is the intent of the City to provide an access road to the Safari r_ reservoir site located within the Ci limits in the Southeast -Srr��:,y.-.• City Quarter of the South- east Quarter of Section 31, 7bwnship 27 North, Range 23 West; and WHEREAS, Fee Owners are the owner of a� y 4,4 -acre parcel located within Goversat!ent `�.• Lot 2, Section 10, Township 115N in Apple Valley adjacent to the City's reservoir site; and .Fee Owners also requ re access to their property and wish to share such he Clay ..n�_.:L�.'�. nu'F.�:s-3w.'v�-...-.� ..i•-��a.'SdE ..- ,�31a:'tL_.��...Y.. T'�r'>^p'C.._C.P--a_. 4-^. ... - r... r� m ��r. �ri,�yv1a;{, nth+e CSty and Fee Owners agree as follows _ 3f sf��FJ•f�4ra.�&s:RtYlw'¢ei�i';L-�/�.�`ry'q-F.�: ev'./.��:•' c' .. r�-•_�'-:; ...M..•. ,�a1iait�..., .-..aL� r. ... ��. ' 1 "Ownership 'The ownership of the access mad and right -of -waxy will be retained - _ 2. Construction of Access Road. The City will be responsible for constructing the �as� - -access road to a 16' aggregate surfaced width and to a 6" depth. ;.gym =>,=• 3. Fee Owners shall be responsible for any future upgrading (widening, bituminous surfacing' etc which they may ��°'�•Y w.SN, ,.. _._•) require. Owners shall also be responsible for sai.ntaining the access mad. This -r shall include grading the surface, placing additional aggregate surfacing if required, and sxxw removal. ,� -•_ S. Terms of Breach. Breach of any teams of this agreement by Fee Owners shall be grounds for denial of further use of the access road until such breach is corrected either by the City or Fee Owners as the case may be. IN WITNESS WHERIDF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals. CITY OF EAGAN Mike Patten By: Its Mayor-.:,��. Shirley Patten \- ATTEST: J Its Clerk roved:• �� ' APP i�a.> � r r Y �� 701�" Eagan Public Works Director -73 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Twenty -Two REAPPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS D. Reapportionment of Special Assessments - Canterbury, Wedgwood '.arid -Oakwood Heights Addtions -- Under Project 345, Wilderness Run Road was improved from Capricorn Court to Dodd Road. Presently, there are pending assessments against the adjacent properties resul- ting from this project. James A. Curry of Lexington South Associ- ates, was the developer of the Canterbury and Wedgwood Additions and the fee owner of the property now platted as Oakwood Heights. He is now requesting that the pending assessments allocated against _.__,those three subdivisions be reallocated to his remaining unplatted within the Lexington South PUD. He has indicated that ,,.,.-.-,,parcelsthis is necessitated by a technical requirement of his Title 10 funding for development of this property which does not allow any -future assessments to be allocated against Canterbury Forest, Wedg- QOakwood Heights"=Additions. The total amount of assess- ood1?1'3nd%or, 4Kments ;,to .be 'respread totals' .$212,007.16 for: the street, storm ewerlateralnaand:storm sewer trunk. This reallocation of pending p.specialwii9sessments;4,4has .been approved through a special agreement by all -affected property owners and duly notarized. This is being h� brought to .the Council's attention because it formally allocates _dditidnaly 9's"sessments into property by special agreement without a formal hearing process. These agreements have been reviewed *,,,,.and .,.approved by the Public Works Department. The following is a list of tax parcels where these additional pending assessments will be allocated if approved by Council action: .--.. 1..:Parcel #10-02600-010-28 _ $ 7,536.80 2. Parcel #10-02600-010-29 29,393.52 3. Parcel #10-02600-015-30 315277.72 4. Parcel #10-02600-010-50 103,700.00 5. Parcel #10-02600-011-51 20,740.00 6. Parcel #10-02600-014-75 19,359.12 The staff has researched all parcels involved and has found that they are of sufficient size to adequately absorb these additional assessments. These amounts may be revised based on the final assess- ment figures for project 345 as these figures relate to the pending assessments at the present time. For the Council's information, enclosed on page -75 is a sample of the agreement executed by the affected property owners providing for this reallocation of special assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the agree- ment for reapportionment of special assessments for the parcels as listed previously. 4- • Ilan �l� •,,rte • • � E ., .. � . - u i-��7�1"iSs9�'�.fY'ri:Tilir.'1• /We hereby request of the City Council, City of Eaean, Minnesota, Reapportion- ment of pending special assessments for Project 0345 on nronerty owned by me/us - .. and legally described as follows: WEDGWOOD ADDITION All lots and Blocks REASSESSMENT to be spread over the following legal descriptions: parcel 10 02600 010 SO ' - - KIND OF IMPROVEMENT PEND!ttg AMOUNT i .v:.;:+•�.-: A. Sweet - 142,996.00 B'.Storm3ttlpr_ Latera] 21 745.60 . . C• Storm Sewer Trunk 138 958.40 -- D. I/WE hereby waive notice of any and all hearings necessary for the reapportion- [' went or reassessment of said assessments and further waive my/our right cc appeal y a reapporcionment . or reassessalent under: Minnesota Statutes 429.071.�i YS«.; ::2,F.. s .�1'i`i.>'.'NT. -, y':: Ss further-understoo'd-ehod-this requmc (hall -be relieved by the City Council the City of Eagan or its agent and I/WE will be given reasonable notice asto+ether - this request is approved or, modified tM, •�-'".}„ 3 x liLd; s�ii _ r.' :. ! firy. r -e+ •s `•, 2Cir' ,"!r'?.k�3•,A, =t ,4 'i >: '• The'undarsigned agrees'to pay all administrative costs incurred and billed by rti~9rav •--�• a ~'�"•-the City in such reassessments. the undersigned !e/are ail of the parsons who -r„"•'''-' have an interest in the property affected by the reassessment, including fee tit1d RWners, "contract `for deed holders or optlonees. +N +• - _ ,. The undersigned agrees that' this waiver shall run with the affected land and - -�r bind the heirs, successors and assigns of such land. :LA ��,•,» -• ---DATED: October 19, 1982 - rN � ` � Y. n Associntes William G. uttn lian Eut ne ons me- ., ,--- Yf //�E�.,.,•.e,Y:,(!j�urf�— t1on, Inc. REQUEST accepted b _ DATED: REQUEST referred to City Council for Action. DATED: November 9, 1982 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ' Approved Approved as Modified _ Denied w��....�— STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) / The or oing was acknowledged before me this /T 'day of l 1982, by James A. Currys President of Jim -Bar Investment Company, a Minnesota corporation, the Managing General Partner of Lexington South Associates, a Minnesota general partnership, on behalf of the part nersh'p. s. LEu ERT A Notary Public p wouaEwlvt- '!4p i CARVER CZJ:ITY •.�� WCy, nE.w.a, i_a A.MI 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Twenty -Three RIDGECLIFFE IST ADDITION TIME EXTENSION E. Ridgecliffe 1st Addition, Time Extension of Development Contract """° —On September '15, 1980, the City and Orrin Thompson Homes entered into a development contract for the Ridgecliffe 1st Addition. Part of this contract required that all street surfacing within this addition must be completed within two years (September 15, 1982). An inspection by the Public Works Department has revealed that the street surfacing has not been completed in accordance with this time frame. In response to a letter by the Public Works ,..,Director, _Orrin Thompson Homes replied that they would like to receive an extension of their required completion date until Septem- ber 1,' 1983 for completion of the streets within the Ridgecliffe 1st Addition. They have agreed to comply with the City's request -- ._--install a temporary blacktop surface on Lenore Lane from Cliff T:::; Road oto approximately X100 =feet -south to accommodate the ingress/ ;fiegress, .movement ionto _.Cliff ,Road from Lenore Lane. -They indicated hat"this work vwill a be .completed by November .15, but would .like KKT�tec'-`t o',receive,Ithe_extension for -the remainder until September 1, 1983. usehis involves an amendment to a formal contract between ;a developer and the City of Eagan, formal Council action is required. W-104 0 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny'the re- quest for ,time -extension _to September 1, 1983 for the completion of street surfacing within the Ridgecliffe 1st Addition. ''�SsiP~r'Y�F4 i..ipC_. `q'x:i+Cf . ..,i:; ._r.rt •. ... ,.. � s/Thomas RL Hedges ity miistrator -76 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 1982 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE Garden Rental Space Enclosed on page 7 $ is a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Monson expres- sing their appreciation for the City providing garden rental space for residents of Eagan. Status of Green Acres Properties Questions have been raised by the City Council as to who qualifies for green acre parcels in the City of Eagan. There were some con- „µ cerns-about-wcorporations-••qualifying for green -acre status. _•.There- ore,the„;City,:Administrator asked the Dakota County Assessor's W"NI!0! f�ice�for,gn;,explanation of the green acres qualification policy. nclosed on -..pages 7 qthrough -go is a letter that was recently eceived =from Robertt=ind, -Senior gricultural Appraiser for thee Dakota County Assessor's office. This letter does address the "policyefor�_;green_,acres,qualification. Protective Inspections Monthly Report/October Enclosed on page IgI is a copy if the Protective Inspections *�°amonthly report for t�month of October. sfF�jrFire Department Monthly Reports �r Enclosed on pages S 2 through VS are the Volunteer Fire Depart- -,ment monthly reportsts or the mont sof April through July. Joint Airport Zoning Board Minutes Enclosed on pages $ (. through q 3 are copies of minutes of the September 9 and 6cto`ier 7 Joint�irport Zoning Board meetings. s/Thomas 1. Hedges ity ministrator %% 0 0 DAKOTA COUNTY 'DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 HWY. 55 -HASTINGS. MINNESOTA 55033 PAUL R. Y� iiTjJ'+:'�N IYu October 29, 1982 a?^, Thomas L. Hedges a,�MY City Administrator uy rri,: ": £3795 Pilot Knob Road 55122 SEYMOUR 8 OLSON ASSESSOR TELEPHONE 512-437.0200 -kr ACRES PROPERTIESd 'YYrlL�ifISTEPF,1t?f2r:.N:4Fn... 3I_k: letter is `a follow up'to the meeting at which Mike Johnson .,,--and I reviewed Mike's of green acres parcels in the City of Eagan. � .�c..�a4 ..,..3{_� :�-c, - .._-ems .� =vffii.: • - .. �7^9�'YSS�1�"`�YrY` �re�•srlsraL�•i'na-''E, r't� «?,�,•3� qa�..�.'#=,r -, ,. :.. ;_ .• ...:.. ._ .. As you are aware, this office is in the process -of conducting a complete -revaluation,.of .all, real,estate-in the City of Eagan. There are no exceptions. This also includes those parcels enjoying the privileges of the green acres law. wS orn7.;f¢v '2'Q'}+z#5'`°i"S,-#e•i+41.%sSfqrs Presently, we+"'�yzs s. i Y.•hf i...uL:. have reviewed all green acres parcels in Eagan k.4 and have found six owners that we have asked to re -submit and verify :.. their qualifications. Some of these owners may be removed, (depending on qualifications) from their green acres status. In regards to those qualifications, it should be noted that corporations can qualify, provided they have owned the land for more than seven years. Homesteaded, or property that has been in the family, does not have to wait seven years. These can qualify for the current assessment, provided the application is submitted before May 1st of the assessment year. In order to qualify, you must own ten acres or more and show a gross income of $300 plus $10 per tillable acre. Rents for pasture use qualify as gross income even though it may be used for grazing horses. It's the GROSS RENT that qualifies, not whether it is rented for horses or cattle. It should also be noted that the main benefit of green acres in a city such as Eagan, is the deferment of special assessments which the assessor has no control of. The only control this office.has, is verification of the minimum requirements of the green acres law. 71 AN EQUAL OPPJRTUNITY EMPLOYER October 29, 1982 I1.. ION Thomas L. Hedges Re: (Veen Acres cw :}+ wr,Page 2 �`'�r�rwv`'J.*�.�"Fit.,¢:�£.wi.�'iivt7,k$�'X,d•.�y"a�,(',?:;jir'�5�1�.:r .._.rdt - i:�-..:..,.' .. .. .. .. . - �`ff��lNlR Fi ?�+>`,?:t''' .tAilJY36,Icuw.tif,.; ,.,.-y.? .•a.:., . ,� �,.•;.... .. ji Because of the nature of: unrecorded Contracts;.for Deeds, we :cannot positively know who is the owner of non=homesteaded properties.—,'' n .' Our only _proof of ownership is as -recorded in the County Recorder's_ ._.._. • - rvuca L n. a,iuu � rerai 4? nism°?3�S rrr — - r--< -,`'Senior Agriculture Appraiser c 'Mike Johnson r ti r �•._..r,--�.�--.:;.:,-� -.:. ...., - --.- - _---.- 1Y'S+tii�'s�-{'.'r'�.i�.i`.is•AW.Lir:o-�ri'r. r. �-.rL:_ .._ 'fes 'a. 'C...' r.. - .. .. • PROfFCPIVP L`TSPFCIZ0I_9 I D MILY RFPOP.T OCTOBER, 1982 L'k�cP=ON/0M- CF FaMS After -,,.-Type .... Units This Nbnth . Year -Tb -Date Puildir� x Plumbing 131.0 _ _ 1,192.0 I?VAC 97.5 997.5 . 73.0 °""`°Aikiiinistrative/Office •`"'`'°'°`.•'°",�"-...,,""'• 495.0 •" Fire Marshal 63.0 1,225.51 Miscellaneous 30.5 332.5 General Office 3.0 213.0' Permit Processi.ne 158.5 11461.5 :'[:• ,.CLtY Gamcil Meetings. 128.5 99.0 0.0 1.5 I�-MM OF PEMJITS ISScjjM $ 146,000.00 $ 589.50 wD.'Ihi c rbnth <z.liuiTding ^��,,r 'c„ ,Il Year -Tb -Date 62 545 Plumbing 0 0 atJec 0 --393 vv -�a.�_p��,r.-`j/�'�'vias.}•�d:�N,�n-.c.u�•....p,�ti��.r�r.',n_T.�.,� UM i.. s a{:, �^ L�[aLYiV'.3VC-`.auLLJlWlr C1K'1.L1J 'luJllT.�J-UM'&i�° 4: if:++1 ` "Y A, amu^ y.1 a Total Fees Include: Puildinr, Pe=.mt Fee, Sim --Charge, Plan Check Fee, SA(: Thit Fee, Rtter Connection Fee, 4h.tcr "'Teter Fee and Fuad Lhi_t Fee. Ell After -,,.-Type .... Units Valuation -- Pesmdt Fee Plan (heckF . x 27 Sin ie Fsmily 27 $1,707,000.00 $ 8,707.50 $4,353.75 $47,530.25 t hmleX .. •'- 6 $ .260,000.00 $ 1.518.00 $ 759.00 $ 9,877.00 16 1,blti-FnMily 16 ' $ 848,000.00 $ 4,648.00 $2,324.00 $27,316.00 2 Gm merical 2 $ 146,000.00 $ 589.50 $ 266.50 $ 4,799.00 0 Industrial 0 0 0 0 0 0 Institutional 0 0 0 0 0 3 Res. ('awe 3 $ 16,000.00 $ 157.50 $ 0 $ 165.60 0 Shin. Pool 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 Miscellaneous 8 5 69,600.00 $ 518.50 $ 141.50 $ 696.00 62 TOTAIS 62 $3,046,600.00 $16,139.001 $7,844.75 $90,383.75 Total Fees Include: Puildinr, Pe=.mt Fee, Sim --Charge, Plan Check Fee, SA(: Thit Fee, Rtter Connection Fee, 4h.tcr "'Teter Fee and Fuad Lhi_t Fee. Ell 0OLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHJREPORI FOR MONTH OF April 1982 401 &1)W,094'u1 W4Vw1*1 TYPE MAN HOURS Fire Calls 580 Rescue Calls 170 mw Wows = Training 401 _-, Truck 6 Equipment Maintenance 168 Station Maintenance 125 Fire Prevention 43 r.ax:r�Cut. Administrative 228 TOTAL 1715 47-, ,_j�,MANPOWER Available Days _...,_.,,:.. ..-,STATION Ul STATION #2 STATION #3 15 3 5 15 17 12 r�x 7 �d1 yq: r 18 ��uaii4d,-;tlrtak i•✓'.Fk�.cF4�r`i.j �'rs ::#fn's).. 4lr i ="TYPE NUMBER Structure 5 Grass 4 'Vehicle, )r ay1n.je;-7alseF " Other •. v;; y :, ; N. '.� . ,, . �,i.yin. L ,r t:;3,f: :s� r F. -c•:. 7 - - 2 TOTAL RESCUE CALLS TYPE Vehicle Accident Medical Industrial Miscellaneous TOTAL LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME 4/12/82 4/30/82 19 NUMBER 0 14 0 0 14 LOCATION 2159 Garnet Lane 1959 Easy Street 2Z $ LOSS $12,000. $12,000. nrrrro Amry House Apartment LOSS $10,000. $ 2,000. VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORI FOi WYM OF Wyy 1981 • WORK PERFORMED TYPE MAN HOURS Fire Calls 1080 Rescue Calls 208 ":...Training 566 truck -& -Equipment -Maintenance Station Maintenance <"'"` 128 .::; "3Yl+iLtF tb`1 �da.+=n:?r..... er,l; :_,.,:e•-h�t;�,. ... 'i ,. RESCUE CALLS TYPE Vehicle Accident Medical Industrial Miscellaneous TOTAL LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME 5/6/82 5/9/82 5/24/82 'oai•Nsi;�% NUMBER 0 15 0 1 16 0. �W(9. f.l�u'rI�]�. �:y14•+..� il_•ui: x� St,l!� $2,550. LOCATION OCCUPANCY LOSS 1645 City View Dr. Home $300.00 Pilot Knob 6 Yankee Barn $2000.00 3105 Pilot Knob Truck $250.00 W CERFORM, jE DrVAR"ENT M R. -Ft MONT. F OF June 1082 140 CERFORM, TVPE MN HOURS Fire Calls 580 Rescue Calls 140 -Training 253 pment'Mda-atenanc U -9 4M , e-- 168 Station Maintenance 1r5 Fire- Prevention 0 Administrative 242 1508 r- 2 STATION -2 ,ESC',';. S NKR :-1-2 Ac --idert L Au-.; 11 a]. cl 1. 'qE'7 A $2. '3. w - N EER :='_RE DEPA_t==\_ MONTH -1 "frPOR'_ vol� OF July WORK ='RFORMED TYPE YAN HOURS Fire Calls 820 ' ..-Rescue Calls 173 nrp `_TrA-fni . e _mak :"-. .. 237 Truck _S Equipment Maintenance ' ' 159 ,`Station Maintenance 120 3 Fire Prevention 20 lAdministr_ative 88 d . izcTOTALs'e2�e�✓aer^;�, .+__ .... . ' 16f7 'trs +r,+L,+ 1STATION #1�,-.. STATION #3 x - — 10 $18,200.00 - . ,-..• a ra.,R�OTAI.."R !sersr.' ..tee;,. ..;7earo:ry r•.rn:..a.. -4- - :,.�-. $16,200,00 RESCUE CALLS _%7UN3ER Acc ent 17 q JAT'i SAYE -OCA -IOL CCCUFA_NCY LOSS 3575 Lexiii,7.:o+ erage 515,000 Rahn 32. :`:L.ct:-_ 5 2,000 Site ,00{,• 11s Wold -Chamberlain Field Joint Airport Zoning Board Meeting 4 p.m., Thursday, October 7, 1982 Metropolitan Airports Commission Conference Room Board Members in Attendance: John Voss, (Chairman), Larry Lee, Mark Mahon, Thomas Egan, Jim Losleben, Larry Shaughnessy, Jr., Vern Luettinger, Rick Wiederhorn, Nancy Witta. Others in Attendance: Nigel Finney, Tom Anderson, Bill Olson, Tim Anderson, Dan Callahan, John Shardlow, George Burkards, Eileen McMahon, David Hozza. kk , — + � +oY av s ,. ,,Minutes to Order man Voss, called _themeefing to order, at 4:05 p.m Approval of Minutes he minutes of the September 9,-1982 meeting were approved. Tg ar SeQor�t,,q iat P1nQOT received -comments :on the :Airport =Zoning Z .a�ttIonns,;>,from�tjie;;City,of,St -Paul, SMAC, and.,the Downtown St =-Paul �a'XJr4°fid �*a rt joint •Zoning Board.—According-to Dick Keinz, the comments 'received 't"`�'•'` more'complaints rather than recommendations_ on how to-change.the ti ins- nDOT 'taff-ciembers,ere _reviewing all, of.,the comments and will rr oRd ovember l5 recommending any changes that should be dered....,Ms. McMahon explained that the only change that Mr. Keinz oned wa the possibility of setting a maximum length for the A and B y . 'However, he recommended that the Board proceed with the zoning P it - weporc on the status'or the Downtown Airport -Zoning Process Ms. McMahon reported -that the Downtown St. Paul Joint Zoning.Board submitted a preliminary draft ordinance to MnDOT last February. MnOOT's response, which was received in August, indicated It was willing to go along with some r= -'-modifications to the Horizontal Zone definition but it still is not willing to go along with the suggestion to eliminate Zone B for Runway 14. MnDOT stipulated that the full length for the A and B Zones be preserved. Ms. McMahon added that the Downtown Airport Joint Zoning Board did extensive research to propose safe alternatives to the regulations and employed some very creative solutions. She suggested that at a future meeting Mr. Wiederhorn give a presentation on the Downtown St. Paul Airport proposed ordinance. At this time the Downtown Joint Zoning Board Is waiting to see If MnDOT will make any changes to the regulations. V. Presentation on Operations of ',Vold -Chamberlain Field Tim Anderson, NAC manager responsible for Noise Abatement, explained the agreements and procedures currently in effect that are designed to reduce the volume and frequency of noise from aircraft operating out of Wold -Chamberlain Field. Major carriers have voluntarily agreed to limit flight operations between I1 - p.m. and o a.m. Practice flights are limited and the najor airlines use airports other than Wold -Chamberlain for practice purposes. ',lhenever possible, arrival and departure operations follow transportation corridors and pass over less populated areas. S(7 Mr. Anderson explained Air Traffic Control procedures for landing and taking -off from Wold -Chamberlain field. He added that an extremely positive relationship exists with the local FAA officials and they are cooperative in ( using the preferential runway system to reduce noise impacts whenever possible. The FAA Is working to streamline its operations procedures and plans to allow for departing aircraft from Runway 22 to turn sooner towards the river corridor areas. The Safety Zones defined in the zoning ordinance do not change with the modification of departure paths.- vim. � ,a4:nr.. A discussing trends"in the-'airline'industry, Mr. Anderson explained that * �•!-" -more1.-1.. ubleIengine turbo props are being used because of increased commuter =,K operations and major air carriers will be using aircraft that is less_ no.isey. 'Wide bodies, which increase passenger capacity, are being used more and ultimately will have the effect of preventing a significant increase. in "OR the number of operations, at Wold -Chamberlain Field. �K^0He,,,added that.,airport safety has improved because more efficient aircraft _ Wold -Chamberlain Field Joint Airport Zoning Board Meeting 4 p.m., Thursday, September 9, 1982 Metropolitan Airports Commission Offices Board Members In Attendance: John Voss, (Chairman), Dale Runkle, Thomas Egan, James Losleben, Lawrence Shaughnessy, Jr., Rick Jopke, Rick Wiederhorn, Wilfred Larry Jung. Others in Attendance: David Hozza, Tim Anderson, Bill Olson, Tom Anderson, Dan '.'. Callahan, George Burkards, John Shardlow, David Phelps, Bernard Friel, Larry Lee, ''.�.65:*£•r+5 Richard Kelnz, David Nybakken, James Fortman. 'na°#T;Y'J,er.-.w"Y'£,i +,�+�,J!.!,..;L•x"' A+1'JyiSY`AZ.'F..4""K'n,'!>k +a.. >;.ti';:.{ .ark. Minutes Call to Order ....Chairman Voss called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. a.II Approval of Minutes M r •,-`r r of ` a + i.er r ..k. s t1 ..-`.> It"•was"moved and seconded to approve the minutes as mailed Motion passed ��'`Tlat L S 1 -yy H yt r.+. -tet L n . i..r•r� r "'�.,„"�''_r .rn ;rs rr,.r-s.l Opening Remarks & Introduct ion _ ... . 4 uRifty, Mr. Keinz,.Assistant Commissioner of Aeronautics for MnDoT, introduced Mr. Nybakkeri;''Regional Airport Engineer for MnDoT, and Mr. Fortman, Director of Airport Development for MnDoT. Mj�.'Keinz explained that in 1973 the state �roa�rwmandated that, in order to be eligible for state aid for airport development purposes, municipalities zone for airport safety. Of the 141 municipal or �publicly-owned airports in the state over 100 are zoned and 30 more are in rl:,.the.process of .being zoned. .-......:r; :., -��„�%�'i 23'. .x�s �a- +�..:..: �:.�P�'i �'r _. S .::S�rJ .'3 �".:r.. y�-y _ ...,. .: .� .., .. .,5• , ' "' '� ' ,.- `IV Explanation of Air_Space Zones and Land Use Zones Mr. Nybakken explained that airport zoning is divided into two -parts - - _._ airspace zoning and land use zoning. Using overhead transparencies, he explained the geometries of airspace zoning, as it applies to Wold - Chamberlain Field. Starting with the 1,000' wide, rectangular, primary surface, he explained that the approach surface begins at the end of the primary surface. It extends upward into the airspace at a slope of 50:1 (50 feet horizontally and 1 foot vertically) and extends outward from the 1,000 foot primary zone at. a ratio of 20 feet horizontal and 3 feet perpindicular. At 1,000 feet out, the approach surface is 4,000 feet wide. The horizontal zone is an imaginary surface existing 150' above the airport elevation. The transitional zone is a trough -Like surface that begins where the primary and approach surfaces meet and it extends outward and upward until it intersects the horizontal surface. The conical surface extends outward and upward from the perimeter of the horizontal zone at a 20:1 ratio for a distance of 4,000 feet. Mr. Nybdkken explained that the restriction that applies to these surfaces is that nothing may penetrate them. There are three land use zones - Zone A, Zone B, and Zone C. Zones A and B are shadows of the approach surface with Zone A starting at the point where the primary and approach surface meet. Zone A extends outward on the ground for a distance equivalent to 2/3 the length of the runway. Zone B continues for a distance equivalent to 1/3 the length of the runway. Zone C is the ground level shadow of the horizontal surface. V. Explanation of the Rationale behind the Design of the Zone To explain the rationale behind the land use restriction for the A and B ". .,Zones, Mr."Nybakken used a handout (see attached.) Exceptions to the land use restrictions do exist. The zoning is not retroactive and therefore existing non -conforming uses and established —residential neighborhoods in built-up urban areas are allowed to continue to exist and are grandfathered into the ordinance. Non -conforming uses are not allowed to become more of a non -conforming use than they were on the day of adoption of the ordinance. The other exception is the limitation that nN y,.�:.,"the zoning authority extends only 2 miles from the airport property. The Zoning Administrator is responsible for enforcing the ordinance and must abide by a strict interpretation of the ordinance In the process of Issuing �yz permits:�i;The,.Board 'of -Adjustment is responsible for allowing variances .To ,�,;kappeal; higher. --than the Board of Adjustment, -an aggreived..party must go ''- --- - -- _ # ,,.Mr., Egan said that Runways 11R -29L and 11L -29R are parallel and accommodate 6 § q asicallyathe-same••traffic.5,•':Because one -is shorter -than the other, the resulting B -Zones have significantly different impacts on development in y Mendota Heights and Eagan. --He asked why one municipality should experience more restrictions than the other when they service the same aircraft. Mr. x Keinz explained that the zoning formula is designed to provide for uses in "" w the future as well as for today. At some point in the future the longer ^�5 ,runway may be needed Por yet -to -be developed aircraft. `Mr. Losleben said the aircraft oftentimes do not fly in the .footprint -of the defined zones and he asked how that can be controlled. Mr. Keinz said that in the approach at 10,000 feet out aircraft are usually following the extended centerline. On takeoff, they sometimes turn sooner than 10,000 feet. Problems most often occur near the threshold and the area near that threshold is most crucial. By the time they are out to the B -Zone area, the plane has enough altitude and speed for the pilot to select a spot for putting it down. National Transportation Advisory Board statistics show that the highest percentage of mishaps occur within one mile of the airport and the percentages decline significantly at two and three miles out. For the purpose of enforcing the ordinance the Zoning Administrator may be one person assigned to enforce it for a multi -jurisdictional area or it may be the Zoninq Administrator for each affected municipality. Mr. Hozza asked which is preferable. MnDOT has not taken a position on the issue. 0 0 Mr. Wiederhorn asked if the existance of Established Residential Neighborhoods within the Safety Zones make a runway or an airport unsafe. Mr Keinz said such development would not necessarily make it unsafe, but the C purpose of zoning is preventative not. corrective. VII. Closing Comments Mr. Keinz noted that the task of zoning for the Wold -Chamberlain Field will not be an easy task. He cautioned the board to give careful consideration _So the task. On the issue of whether or not MnDoT plans to make any changes to its zoning rules based on the public testimony it is now taking, Mr. Keinz said he was willing to listen to new ideas. He does not foresee any major changes, however. III. Next Meeting Date/Adjourn - --MAC operations staff will be invited to attend the next meeting to discuss : any conflict they see between the proposed zoning areas and actual operations and to explain how they would comply with the ordinance. x The next_ meeting will Abe held at-4,p.m., Thursday, October 7 at MAC. ,YY^ttp v:ub.fii •Y: y. ..a. f- .. .. .., .. 40 OINNESOr4 ro yo 0 'OF TRW Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Phone LAND USE SAFETY ZONING '.<.,.A -..PURPOSE: To encourage those land uses that are safely compatible with the airport. 1. Airports and that area within one mile of an airport represents 1/2 •�, '! •.+:of one percent of the land mass in Minnesota, and about 70% of re- i+;;�-,�e, �odta,,,g.�lfvittFe7 n%'Vacorded aircraft •accidents are occurring within -that •small percen tes+ar+3a..�;;traz1 �:ti,��. °of area. ,.. .- � t2Se 2. Accidents on or within one mile of an airport occur during takeoff * ' �r landing operations when aircraft are operating at altitudes pg ��^and near critical stall speeds. vYutui= az cv_wnere ro make a Iorcea iana=g become extremely ' -•.limited when operating at low altitudes and sio:•:er speeds. *10 010" "k4 n_the intere t� of spa ety, open spaces to accommodate forced lendings �> should be encouraged in areas where aircraft are kno,,m to be operating "4s xr+^• at these critical speeds and altitudes, i.e. approach areas to airport runways. tv,+SB CONCEPT OF LAND USE SAFETY ZONE SIZE Width Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 77. 2. Flared Sides — Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 77. 3. Length — Proportioned to runway length. a. Longer runways attract more activity. b. Longer runways attract larger more sophisticated aircraft. c. The larger the aircraft and the more the activity, the greater the frequency of longer and flatter approaches and departures. C. CONCEPT OF SEOMENTS 1. On an approach or departure, the closer the operation is to the runway, the more critical the situation because of diminished altitude and speed. 2. Logic then follows that land use safety restrictions can transition fro,m very restrictive (Zone A) to no restrictions. 3. Reality dictates that due to the complexities of zoning the number of transitions be limited to one. (Zone B) 91 An Equal Opportunity Employer C D. CONCEEPT OF USE RESTRICTIONS 1. Zone A. Critical area. A troubled aircraft in need of'this area will norm ally have no maneuvering potential. From a'safety stand- point, no development should be permitted. ,,... 2. -6-B. " Transitional area. A troubled aircraft in need of this area will normally be operating with enough speed and altitude to provide sore minor maneuvering potential in the straight ahead direction. From a safety standpoint, development should be controlled so as to provide reasonable open space in which to maneuver a a:,.•. •;z.... .. .,-forced landing. E. MISCEUMEOUS CONSIDERATIONS 1. ?thy should runway length determine land use safety zone length? a The Mdrnesota zoning statute provides the authority to zone in 7=-V2% a1°�: the approach areas -to runways out to a distance of two miles. rG1^,, b� ; The longest runways in Minnesota are about two miles in length._ * Tying runway length to land use safety zone length is consistent WWP with=la,r4,The longest runways maximize the use of the .'zoning authority, ' and shorter runways may use proportionately less of the �s•�'"fv{zonu►g authority e It's simple, reasonable; and equitable. OWL 2. :•]hy split Zone A and Zone B on a 2/3 - 1/3 ratio of runway length? a. Most smaller Minnesota airports, particularly the smaller paved airports, have acquired clear zone protection out to a distance of 2000 feet from the primary surface. b. Typically, the smallest airports having clear zone protection are airports with about a 3000 foot paved primary runway.* c. This crell established airport situation tends to create a basis for determining an acceptable level of safety in the more simple case; 3000 foot runway with 2000 foot clear zone. That's a 2/3 ratio. d. The area ratio.of Zone A to Zone B more closely approximates a simple 50/50 split. 92 �I d w z 0 tl a��y}.ifiv: .! 1 � v� xrft� 41�✓•f-r.�{F}N -' 'r �-fl 3t ;e r+.$N� �pI}•-Y S 6+ih'amy��'��lrTY�fA`Ty`Ir�v'vAy\�q','o�_ .�y"y �. G4Tt�Y��'V+''r -~ T+F�S. 1f `J�M•�'s,.a]Y.�er1�YF35.10.Z! LZr.9eiJ�v'v ` 1 d - .. �Fr•n!' ._...,,Ae':rfi.A.+ir�r.. snrn......... . ...... _ _ w Wit.. n�11rY ��' Wil}M n9 }� 1'41r1}:i ?£'t .•h y(''� ... r -J•sFlu �.Y��.i. "ya 14 T� 1 vIM t, I J rrA'::f ....:W.Si.l.. yM"� � .. '.^�.Nr ".7 �' '.� a. '..,'e" �I d w z 0 tl a��y}.ifiv: .! 1 � v� xrft� 41�✓•f-r.�{F}N -' 'r �-fl 3t ;e r+.$N� �pI}•-Y S 6+ih'amy��'��lrTY�fA`Ty`Ir�v'vAy\�q','o�_ .�y"y �. G4Tt�Y��'V+''r -~ T+F�S. 1f `J�M•�'s,.a]Y.�er1�YF35.10.Z! LZr.9eiJ�v'v d - s AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL NOVEMBER 9, 1982 6:30 P.M. I. 6;30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:33 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES p.� III. 6:35 - ESTABLISH BOND SALE DATE FOR GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS - MILLER & 1 SCHROEDER, INC., ERNIE CLARK rI IV. 6:40 - TAX ABATEMENTS - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE e V. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS Q.NO A. Fire Department Q,kO B. Police Department Q,10 C. Park Department Iti'L D. Public Works Department VI. 6:55 - CONSENT ITEMS (One motion approves all items) ?AS A. Project 366, Receive Feasibility Report (Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir) ef-5 B. Approve MnDOT Plans & Specs (I-494 Retention Ponds) '17 C. Project 342, Receive Petition (Elimination of Nicols Frontage Road) tLOJ D. Contract 82-6, Change Order #1 (Deep Well #7) '?"141E. Grading/Excavation Permit, NW'k of Section 2 (T.H. 55 -McLean Property p�\ F. Project 369, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Sheffied \ Addition - Streets & Utilities) VII. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS 3LA. Project 297-R, Final Assessment Hearing (Blackhawk Lake Outlet) B. Ordinance Codification Q9j1 C. Housing Plan Modifications VIII. OLD BUSINESS IX. NEW BUSINESS p 3OXA. Bradley W. Hanson for a 10' Setback Variance to Construct a Garage ` 20' from the Right -of -Way of a Public Street Located on Lot 22, Block 1, Wilderness Run 3rd Addition, in Section 27, 1281 Vildmark Dr. 50 B. Temporary Advertising Signs for Countryside Builders, Inc. VS3 C. Lone Oak Heights, Consideration of Preliminary Plat Extension to (Orrin Aune) `0 b D. Hilltop of Eagan, Consideration of Final Plat Approval (Developer's e' Construction) 6% E. Richard Hallady Concerning a Building Permit Application for a Q Detached Storage Building at 3248 Terminal Drive qd 63 F. Consideration of a Swimming Pool Ordinance .9 Eagan City Council Agenda November 9, 1982 Page Two X. ADDITIONAL ITEMS Q 70 A. Contract 82-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Brittany 4th & Safari Reservoir Watermain) B. Contract 82-14, Approve Plans & Spec, Order Advertisement for P' Bids (Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir) .0-C. Approve Joint Use Agreement for Road Access, Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir D. Reapportionment of Special Assessments - Canterbury, Wedgwood e & Oakwood Heights Additions tIG E. Ridgecliffe 1st Addition, Time Extension of Development Contract XI. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For those persons not on the agenda) XII. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COU'NCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 1982 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval of the October 19, 1982 regular City Council minutes and special City Council minutes for the October 27 meeting and the November 9, 1982 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration: G.O. BOND SALE - MILLER & SCHROEDER MUNICIPALS. INC. There are two (2) bond sales proposed for a sale date of December 8, 1982 at 12:00 noon. The City is to consider the issuance of $965,000 general obligation city hall bonds and $2,500,000 general obligation improvement bonds. The City will be able to save expen- ses by selling both issues at the same time through the printing of one prospectus, combined staff time for Miller & Schroeder Muni- ciples, Inc., and reduced costs for bond ratings. The two issues are a $965,000 for general obligation city hall bonds, a copy of which is enclosed on pages 2 through 3 , and a $2,500,000 general obligation improveme-n—t-'B-o—na issue, a copy of which is enclo- sed on pages + through 6 The information describing the general obligation mprovement and issue does include a listing of all projects that are included in that proposed bond sale. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1. A motion is in order to consider the establishment of a bond sale date for December 8, 1982 to sell $965,000 of general obligation city hall bonds and $2,500,000 general obligation improvement bonds (12:00 noon); and 2. A motion is in order to consider the designation of a special City Council meeting for December 8, 1982 at 5:00 p.m. ,f Tall i�ree Minnesota (800) 862-6002 • ..Toll Fre:, other States (800) 328-6122 9 Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 • (612) 831-1500 November 1, 1982 SALE MEMO TO Mr. Stephen Rosholt Faegre & Benson 1300 Northwestern Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 FROM Ernest L. Clark ISSUE $965,000 General Obligation City Hall Bonds, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota INITIAL RESOLUTION November 9, 1982, Regular Council Meeting, 6:30 P.M. SALE DATE December 8, 1982, 12 o'clock noon, award special Council meeting, 5 o'clock P.M. DATED DATE December 1, 1982 DUE DATE December 1 MATURITIES $ 25,000-1984 40,000-1985 50,000-1986/90 75,000-1991/92 100,000-1993/97 INTEREST December 1, 1983 and semiannually thereafter on December 1 and June 1 REDEMPTION December 1, 1994, bonds due 1995 through 1997 and any interest date thereafter, at par. RATES 8 coupon rates allowed, in ascending order, to be expressed in multiples of 1/20th of 1%. DISCOUNT $15,000 allowed Z Headquarters_ Minneapolis_, Minnesota Branch Officer Downtown ,Minneapolis • Solana Beach. California • iYorNbrook. Illinois • SL Paul. Minnesota • Naples. Florida • Carsan City iYe,ada .Mernoer ul ttte Secunues imestar Ratecuon Corpommn DENOMINATION $5,000 unless purchaser, within 48 hours of award specifies a higher denomination in multiples of $5,000. PAYING AGENT Designated by successful bidder within 48 hours of sale to be ratified by the City. The City will pay reasonable fees. GOOD FAITH . $19,300 Cashier's or Certified Check or Bank Draft. FUNDS Bond proceeds must be in immediately available funds not Clearing House Funds. PROJECT INFORMATION Building Expansion Costs $750,000 Remodeling Costs, Existing City Hall 50,000 Architect's Fee 64,000 Equipment, construction contingencies 80,000 Issuance Costs 21,000 Total $965,000 ILI oil Fte Minnesota (800) 862-6002 i • b:l Free Cather States (800) 328-6122 L Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 a 1612) 831-1500 November 1, 1982 i;1,1M a olv • TO Mr. Stephen Rosholt Faegre & Benson 1300 Northwestern Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 FROM Ernest L. Clark ISSUE $2,500,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1982, City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota. INITIAL RESOLUTION November 9, 1982, Regular Council Meeting, 6:30 P.M. SALE DATE December 8, 1982, 12 O'clock Noon, award special Council meeting, 5 o'clock P.M. DATED DATE December 1, 1982 DUE DATE June.l MATURITIES $625,000-1984 300,000-1985/88 150,000-1989 100,000-1990/93 50,000-1994 25,000-1995/97 INTEREST June 1, 1983 and semiannually thereafter on June 1 and December 1 REDEMPTION On June 1, 1992, bonds due 1993 through 1997 and any interest date thereafter, at par. 0 Headquarters: Minneapolis. Minnesota Branch Offices: Downtown Minneapolis • Solana Beach, Ca Iifornra • ❑onhorook. Illinois • 5L Paul. Minnesow • iNeples. Fipnda • Orson City. Nevada rlemoer of the Se<urmes Inrezmr Proreaion Cn,w,aton RATES 8 coupon rates allowed, in ascending order, to be expressed in multiples of 1/20th of 1%. DISCOUNT $35,000 allowed. $5,000 unless purchaser, within 48 hours of award, specifies a higher denomination in multiples of $5,000. PAYING AGENT Designated by successful bidder within 48 hours of sale to be ratified by the City. The City will pay reasonable fees. GOOD FAITH $50,000 Cashier's or Certified Check or Bank Draft. FUNDS Bond proceeds must be in immediately available funds not Clearing House Funds. BOND PROCEEDS Project Costs $2,180,000 Capitalized_ Interest and Issuance Costs 320,000 $2,500,000 PROTECT See Attachment 5 NUMBER 321 326 332A 343 350 352 NA (Press - Red St) 335B 340B 341B 356 357 360B 363A 364A 366-I 359 (002/81-13) NA 0 0 $2,500,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1982 City of Eagan, Minnesota PROJECT INFORMATION R BOND DESCRIPTION YEARS AMOUNT Hay Lake Trunk Sewer 15 $ 190,000 South Oaks/Trunk Storm Sewer & Sanitary Sewer 15 85,000 Overhill Farm Addition & Hay Lake Trunk Sewer 5 105,000 Briar Hill 4th Addition (Phase II)/Streets & 5 245,000 Utilities Oster Addition/Utilities & Streest 5 90,000 Storland Road/Watermain 5 25,000 Pressure Reducing Station 5 25,000 Twin View Manor 2nd Addition/Streets 5 25,000 Windcrest 2nd Addition/Streets 5 40,000 Windtree 2nd Addition/Streets 5 80,,000 Comsery 1st Addition/Utilities & Streets 10 630,000 Cinnamon Ridge 3rd Addition/Streets & 5 355,000 Utilities Towerview Road/Street 10 130,000 Hilltop Plaza (James Refrigeratn)/Utilities 10 35,000 Brittany 4th Addition/Watermain 10 30,000 Safari 4.0 MG Water Reservoir/Reservoir 5 55,000 Park Cliff 1st Addition/Storm Sewer 5 15,000 Slaters Road Trunk Water 5 20,000 Project Total $2,180,000 Capitalized Interest 320,000 Total Issue $2,500,000 R Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Two TAX -ABATEMENTS TAX ABATEMENTS - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE Mr. Bill Peterson of the Dakota County Assessor's Office is planning to be present and to recommend two (2) tax abatements. For a copy of the tax abatements and a map showing their location within the community, refer to pages $ through cl ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the two tax abatements as recommended by Dakota County. 4 ABATEMENTS-- • Real Estate: Approved N.W. Mutual Life Ins, #10-00300-020-01 Eagan, City of Shell Oil Company 10-03000-011-25 Eagan, City of Nolter 2, 1982 Upon reviewing the property it was found that the land had been taken by the State Highway Dept. in 1969 for I-494 highway per Louis Robards. The transfer had not been recorded with the county Therefore, the values and taxes should be reduced to nil for 1979, 1980 and 1981. Upon reviewing the property it was found that the building value had been over -valued. ThereforQ, the assessed value should be reduced to $38,166. L 16. AfFENDOM -- -- - ------ 9 - -------- --- J 14bl First Bank Ealp"O.ffim I... .... ...... ......... ....... rd IL rm G1 0010 C IV zr� • llA ' 5i i WA i zu I r(p if 9! A �2 g ,y L-A %.Zs �n APPLE •VALLEY r RosEmotmr r7 17 e....... . ..... Pill, 9 First Bank Ealp"O.ffim I... .... ...... ......... ....... e....... . ..... Pill, `I Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Three DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Fire Department at this time. POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- The State of Minnesota Department of Ad- ministration has developed through joint powers cooperative pur- chasing for certain police equipment which consists of squad cars, radar and other related units. The cooperative purchasing procedure is somewhat similar to that of Hennipin County; the City of Eagan has participated in joint purchasing of certain items of equipment with Hennepin County for the past several years. Enclosed on page 11 is a copy of the cooperative purchasing agreement. The ad- vantages for cooperative purchasing are as follows: reduced costs, improved specifications, increased price competition, indirect savings eliminating administrative duplication and, last but not least, the manpower savings of time of preparing requisitions for bids and making evaluations and testing equipment. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny authori- zing the City of Eagan to enter into a cooperative purchasing agree- ment with the State of Minnesota and to direct the appropriate City official to execute the agreement on the part of the City. PARK DEPARTMENT C. Park Department -- There are no items to be considered for the Park Department at this time. 10 ' COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT (STATE CONTRACTS) WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Administration of the State of Minnesota, procures for State Agencies through competitive bidding various supplies, commodities and equipment, which are then ordered by or for the Agencies by appropriate methods, and WHEREAS, the State Legislature by Minnesota Statutes 1969, Sec. 471.59 has authorized the State and it's Political Subdivisions to enter into agreements to exercise jointly the govermental powers and functions each has individually, and WHEREAS, the State and the *(Name of Political Subdivision) wish to combine their purchasing functions as is specifically provided below so that the *(Political Subdivision)may avail itself of the prices which have been agreed upon by the State and its Vendor. THERFORE, it is the purpose of this Agreement to make available to the *(Political Subdivision) the commodities listed below, at the prices and terms As are available to the State under contracts entered into under competitive bidding pursuant to M.S. (1969), Chapter 16, by the Commissioner of Administration. (listing of commodities) IT IS AGREED that if the Political Subdivision chooses to buy from any such State Contracts, it shall purchase all of its requirements for the above commodities as they arise by placing purchase orders against such State Contracts, for the commodities stated, in accordance with all conditions,, terms, specifications, and prices stated in such contracts. Orders shall be issued by *(Political Subdivision) in accordance with its regularly authorized purchasing procedure. The State Contract number shall be shown on the purchase order. The *(Political Subdivision) shall make payment directly to the Vendor in accordance with it's established procedures. Neither the State nor its purchasing agent, personally or officially, shall assume any responsibility for the accountability of funds expanded hereunder by the *(Political Sub- division), or the issuance or non -issuance of any purchase order by the *(Political Subdivision). Each party shall separately be accountable for its own expenditures of public funds made hereunder. Both parties hereto agree to save and hold each other harmless from any loss or damage for any reason arising from this agreement. (POLITICAL SUBDIVISION) STATE OF MINNESOTA By.... BY Title Title Date, " " " " " Date *(Fill in name of Political Subdivision in these spaces) Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Four PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D. Public Works Department -- Item #1: On Street Parking Complaint - Nicols Road South of Cliff—fiTie Engineering Department as received complaints trom property owners who live south of Cliff Road pertaining to periodic on street parking associated with Durnings Restaurant during peak establishment hours. They have indicated that because of the rural ditch section of Nicols Road and the narrow width of the bituminous surface that the travel way is reduced to one lane in front of Durnings Restaurant at periodic times. They have requested the installation of no parking signs on Nicols Road from Cliff Road to the south property line of Durnings Restaurant to assure that all parking is contained on site. The Engineering Department supports this complaint and recommends consideration of authorizing the installation of no parking signs on both sides of Nicols Road south of Cliff Road. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the in- stallation of no parking signs on Nicols Road south of Cliff Road. Item #2: Cedarvale Boulevard (T.H. 13)/Silver Bell Road Intersec- tion — Left Turn Restriction -- As the Council may recall, the Director of Public Works in ormally discussed the problems associa- ted with the left turn movement at the intersection referenced above. The Police Department has issued approximately 160 citations for people who have made illegal left turns through the break in the median on Silver Bell Road. Enclosed on page 13 is a copy of a memo from the Chief of Police indicating that tris restriction is unenforceable due to the sheer numbers of violations. Earlier this year, Director of Public Works Colbert forwarded a request. to the MnDOT District 9 traffic engineer requesting their review of this interchange and making recommendations as to how we might eliminate and/or minimize the problems associated with this left turn movement. Their response is enclosed on page 14- . In sum- mary, the Police Department and Public Works Department support the closing of the median on Silver Bell Road. MnDOT offers as an alternative the potential designation of Cedarvale Boulevard from Silver Bell Road to Rahn Road as a one way street in the south- west bound direction only. Either of these two options would re- quire all traffic exiting from the Cedarvale Shopping Center to Rahn Road,, Beau D'Rue Drive to the intersection with Silver Bell Road which is presently controlled by a three way stop sign. If either one of these options is not approved, the left turn restric- tion during peak hours should be removed due to its present high degree of non-compliance. Because this is technically MnDOT right- of-way, the Director of Public Works is not sure that MnDOT would approve the removal of this left turn restriction during peak hours. Therefore, the staff is bringing this to the Council's attention for consideration of one of the two alternatives being presented. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the desig- nation of Cedarvale Blvd. as a one way between Silver Bell Road and Rahn Road or authorize the elimination of the median opening on Silver Bell Road at its intersection with Cedarvale Blvd. 1z i Martin DesLaurien Chief of Police Jay M. Berthe Assistant Chief of Police TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Wagarx 3pDt10E Dep0tIT nt i n Thomas L..Hedges, City Administrator Chief of Police 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 1 November 1982 Intersection of Old Highway 13 & Silver Bell Road It is my understanding that MNDOT is responsible for the above intersection. I would like to ask the City Council to authorize MNDOT to build a curb, and to.restrict all left turns from old Highway 13 to new Highway 13 at Siler Bell -Road. We believe all left turns at this intersection should be prohibited. If the above is not feasible, I would like to have the present signs removed. Because of our past experience, we believe these signs are not enforceable. nain DesLauriers MD/vk / CC: Tom Colbert V 13 THE LONE OAK TREE — THE SKVI rOL OF STRENGTH & GROWTH l.%' OUR CO.tl.t/UNITY' 44>0e u1NESo0 Minnepta Department of Transportation District 9 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 September 15, 1982 Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 211999 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 In reply please refer to: 319 S.P. 1901 (TH 13) Silver Bell Road at Old T.H. 13 Left Turn Restriction Dear Mr. Colbert: 2050 (612) 7702311 As requested in your August 23, 1982 letter, we have reviewed the no left turn restriction from northbound Old T.H. 13 to Silver Bell Road. The attached map shows proposed additional signing. This signing directs motorists to use Rahn Road and Beau D'Rue Drive to get to Highway 13 along with advance signing for the no left turn restriction. The large number of violations that your police department is experiencing is not that uncommon. Often, signing will not solve the problem and other solutions that will change the circulation pattern should be looked at. One thought is to make Old T.H. 13 a one—way southwestbound between Rahn Road and Silver Bell Road. This would force motorists to use Rahn Road and Beau D'Rue Drive route. Some temporary traffic control devices, such as barricades and barrels could accomplish making it a one—way on a trial basis. Before we make any signing changes, we request that you review our thoughts for a one—way. It is our experience that many motorists drive by instinct. They may read most of the signs when finding a destination, however, on their return trip, they expect to use the same route they came and disregard or don't read signing on the return trip. These are the motorists that need physical devices in the roadway to force them to use a different route. We have not gone into any detail as to what would all have to be done for a permanent one—way; however, we do not feel it would be too extensive. We will wait to hear from you before doing any changes. If there are any questions, please call Mr. Bruce Hall or myself. Sincerely, Ra(- ALI6t2Yz1_: ►4 Mark R. Wikelius, P.E. District Traffic Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer Attachment: 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Five CONSENT ITEMS. There are six (6) items to be considered under the agenda referred to as Consent Items which require one motion for approval of all items. If there are any items the City Council wishes to discuss in detail, those items should be placed under additional items unless the discussion required is brief. PROJECT 366 A. Project 366, Receive Feasibility Report (Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir) -- Enclosed on pages /& throughZ is a copy of the feasibility report discussing installation and construction of the Safari 4.0 M.G. water reservoir to be constructed on the Sieg property just west of Safari Path adjacent to Apple Valley. Funding for this project will be provided from the existing trunk water funds for supply and storage of our water distribution system. Therefore, no public hearing will be required and this report is just being presented for the Council's information. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 366 (Safari 4.0 M.G. water reservoir). IS 0 0 REPORT ON 4.0 MILLION GALLON WATER RESERVOIR PROJECT No. 366 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1982 FILE No. 49222 /3 , Qaaeue, l4"dwlth a 44&w4a& , Yom eawdwiliwq �'Ky�„eya SL ,haw/, Mbumeala /6 0 2335 V. 7-_ _A .4.pL 36 St. naJ, hf - .& 55ff3 PA...- 6f2 - 6364600 October 5, 1982 City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 Attn: Mr. Tom Colbert Re: 4 M.G. Water Reservoir Project No. 366 Our File No. 49222 Dear Mayor and Council: Orw G, Bonmr.h, P.E. Rohn W. Hvrnv. P.E. J03 yh C. AAd Ik, P.E. Bmdf.,d A_ L. ,, P. E. RwftM E, T.nnr. P.E. Jvm.•C. OMm, P.E. GM.. R. r- A. P}.'. Knrh A. Gurdun. PE. Thvm.r E. Ngr,, P.E. RBhvd W. Jbvn. P E. HnMrr G. Shv ,hr. PE. Mvnn L. &n.dm. P.E. Dv.dd C'. bvAuMq 1. E. Jmr A. &arson. P.E. Mad A. /Lown. I. E. TM K. /10d, PE. Mrhm T R.urmunn, PE CA.,kr A. Erak,a !.ro M. P..YAAr /lanvn M. Obn. Orme F.'. Otwn Transmitted herewith is our report for the 4 million gallon water reservoir, Project No. 366 located on the recently acquired site in the Sieg property in Section 31. This report covers the trunk water main extension from Safari Pass to the site, the necessary access driveway, the steel water reservoir and related de- tails. The location and construction of this water reservoir is in accordance with the 1982 Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution System Report for the City of Eagan. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. .p (a-� Robert W. Rosene RWR:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Robert W. Rosene Date: October 5, 1982 Reg. No. 3488 Approved by; c _ � by; A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Date: 140 - -d',1 17 0 4 MILLION GALLON WATER RESERVOIR SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of a 4 million gallon steel water reservoir which will provide water storage for the high elevation pres- sure zone in the southern portion of the City. This reservoir is located as shown on the 1982 Water Supply and Distribution System Master Plan and will have a high water elevation of 1150. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible and is in accor- dance with the 1982 Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution System Master Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out in two contracts. The first contract will include the installa- tion of the 24" diameter trunk water main and access driveway from the exist- ing 24" main in Safari Pass to the reservoir site. The second contract will include the 4 million gallon steel water reservoir together with related de- tails and additional crushed rock surfacing for the access driveway. ;eThe estimated project costs presented herein are based on anticipated cur- rent costs. The site of the reservoir and the access easement to the site have previously been acquired. Costs associated with the acquisition of this property have not been included in the costs shown herein. DISCUSSION: At the present time, developed property in the High Elevation Pressure Zone in the southern part of the City is served by the water booster station located on Cliff Road east of Pilot Knob Road. A small pneumatic tank at the booster station maintains pressure on the system together with the electric motor driven booster pumps. In recent years, the residential growth in this pressure zone has increased rapidly until there are now over 1,000 - 1 - 2022b 118 homes being served in this zone. If a power outage occurs or if the booster station controls are disrupted by lightning, less than a 15 minute supply of water is available in the pneumatic tank. This has happened on several occa- sions in the past. The Water Distribution System Master Plan shows a 4 million gallon ground storage reservoir west of Safari Pass in Section 31 close to the south Eagan City limits. With the construction of the 20" diameter trunk water main in the relocated Galaxie Avenue, it is now feasible to construct this reservoir and serve the entire high elevation pressure zone with this reservoir. With its completion, the service in the high zone will be more dependable. The current booster station will be used to fill this reservoir and the current pneumatic tank will not be required for ordinary service. It will, however, be retained for use in the event of a water main break or when required during repainting of the water reservoir. The new steel reservoir will be equipped with cathodic protection using the permanent anode system which does not require yearly changing of the an- odes. It will also have telemetering equipment to control the booster station so as to maintain the proper tank level. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: This reservoir will serve all of the high elevation pressure zone in the southern portion of Eagan. No assessments will be re- quired. The project will be paid for from funds collected from connection charges for supply and storage. These connection charges are collected from each building connected to the water system at the time of construction and from Commercial/Industrial Zoned property on an acreage basis when trunk water main is made available to that property. 2 - 2022b I p e 0 0 COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented at the back of this re- port. A summary of these costs are as follows: Contract A - Trunk Water Main h Access Drive $ 61,740.00 Contract B - Water Reservoir 870,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST .............. $931,740.00 The total estimated project cost as outlined herein including contingen- cies and all related overhead is $931,740.00. Overhead costs are estimated at 27% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. EASEMENTS: The site required for this reservoir and the access road easement to the site have previously been acquired from the Sieg family. No other easements or land acquisition will be required for this project. ASSESSMENTS: No assessments are required to be levied against benefited prop- erty for this project. All costs are to be paid from connection charges to be received for water supply and storage from developed properties served by the water system. Current rates being charged are as follows: Single Family Residential Multi -Family Residential Commercial/Industrial $420/Lot $335/Unit $1,945/Developable Acre (It should be noted that the $1,945 per acre charged to Commercial/Indus- trial property includes trunk main oversizing as well as water supply and storage. One half of the charge is to be allocated to main oversizing and the other half to supply and storage.) 2022b - 3 - WN 9 0 REVENUE SOURCES: The revenue sources to cover the cost of this project will be from existing funds in the supply and storage trunk fund or from general obligation bonds to be paid for from future supply and storage connection charges. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Present feasibility report Approve Plans and Specifications - Part I Approve Plans and Specifications - Part II Open Bids - Part I Open Bids - Part II Award Contract - Part I Award Contract - Part II Construction Completion - 4 - 2022b �` November 9, 1982 October 5, 1982 November 9, 1982 October 27, 1982 December 2, 1982 November 9, 1982 December 7, 1982 November, 1983 4 MILLION GALLON WATER RESERVOIR COST ESTIMATE PROJECT NO. 366 PART I TRUNK WATER MAIN AND ACCESS DRIVE 700 Lin.ft. 24" Diameter D.I.P. Water Main @ $40.00/lin.ft 1 Each Hydrant @ $800.00/each 1 Each Connect to 24" diameter main @ $500.00/each LUMP SUM Clear and Grub @ L.S. LUMP SUM Seeding with topsoil @ L.S. LUMP SUM Grading and Borrow @ L.S. 300 Ton Class II Aggregate base @ $6.67/ton +5X Contingencies +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest TOTALTRUNK WATER MAIN ............................... PART II WATER RESERVOIR Steel Reservoir 94' diameter by 78' high Concrete Foundation Cathodic Protection, Permanent Anodes Painting and Disinfection Piping and Valves Electrical and Controls Site Work +27X Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest TOTAL WATER RESERVOIR ................................ CONTRACT A - TRUNK WATER MAIN CONTRACT B - WATER RESERVOIR TOTAL PROJECT .......................... �C 2022b 2Z $ 28,000 800 500 4,000 3,500 7,500 2,000 $ 46,300 2,315 $ 48,615 13,125 $ 61,740 $460,000 70,000 20,000 90,000 20,000 18,000 7,000 $685,000 185,000 $870,000 $ 61,740 870,000 $931,740 C� %DDER Q AGE SAFARI 4.0 MILLION GALLON NATER RESERVOIR PROJECT No. 366 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESiROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASWC., INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS St. Paul, mimeses 23 FILE No. 49222 SAFARI PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE 30' PERMANENT EASEMENT Scale: f=100' PROPOSED 24° DIP WATER MAIN — 2504 PART 11 0 c0 N 15 EXISTING 24° WATER MAIN I� II II II l So. LINE SEC. 31 Ili I I SAFARI II 1, 4.0 MILLION GALLON i WATER RESERVOIR SITE ll II PROJECT No. 366 ill EAGAN, MINNESOTA LVE PIT 24 @OWMNO, ROSENE, ANDERIIK & AStK RN;. CONSULTM UJFAMURS St. Paul, Nlaaaaeta FILE No. 49222 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Six MnDOT PLANS & SPECS - I-494 RETENTION PONDS B. Approve MnDOT Plans & Specs (I-494 Retention Ponds) -- The City has received detailed plans and specifications for the con- struction of storm water detention ponds for the I-494 interstate to be located on the Bloomington side of the Minnesota River. These plans also involve the elimination of the construction road within the Minnesota River Valley. Because a portion of this project is technically located within the City of Eagan, formal approval by Council action is required prior to awarding of the contact by MnDOT. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To pass the resolution approving the detailed plans and specifications for S.P. 1986-25 (494=393) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said resolution. PROJECT 342 C. Project 342, Receive Petition (Elimination of Nicols Frontage Road) -- Enclosed on pages *a (o and 'Z is a petition the City received from six of the seven affected property owners who live on the Nicols Road frontage road located between Sapphire Lane and Cedar Grove Elementary School in the Cedar Grove 1st Addition. If the Council receives this petition, the elimination of this frontage road will be included in Project 342, discussing the recon- struction/repair of streets in the Cedar Grove 1st Addition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for elimination of the Nicols frontage road under Project 342. as BEA BLOMOUIST MAYOR THOMASEGAN CITY OF -ALAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER 2TN PILOT KNOB ROAD COUNCIL MEMBERS P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN,MINNESOTA $1122 July 8, 1982 PHONE 454-6100 JOE CARROLL 4106 NICOLS RD EAGAN MN 55122 �y Re: Project #342 - Petition for Frontage Road Elimination Dear Mr. Carroll: THOMAS HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE 'CITY CLERK l Attached to this letter is a sample petition form as you requested pertaining to the elimination of the frontage road adjacent to Nicols Road as a part of the proposed upcoming Cedar Grove street restoration project referenced above. Please feel free to modify this petition if you feel that it does not specifically address your concerns. It would be advantageous to have this petition form returned to my attention by the end of July so that we can incorporate it in our feasibility report which will be presented to the City Council for use at the future public hearing discussing these improve— ments. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions as we go through the process. Sincerely, omas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/hnd Enclosure 2(0 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY. L �• For City Use Only • Petition # 3 Ve j Date Received 7_�;_�.� PETITION 'Presented to Council j_ p PROJECT #342 CEDAR GROVE FRONTAGE ROAD ELIMINATION We, the undersigned owners of the real property adjacent to Nicols Road, hereby petition the City Council to consider the elimination of the existing frontage road in front of our residences and to construct a driveway con- nection directly to Nicols Road. We would also like to request that the existing area presently used as frontage road be removed and replaced with topsoil and grass. We understand that by signing this petitionwe are requesting the City to perform a feasibility study wherein the estimated costs of these improve- ments will be tabulated. We understand that upon completion of this re- quested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the facts contained in the feasibility report as presented at the public hearing. This petition is being submitted because of the concern pertaining to the deteriorated state of this frontage .road and our desires to have it eliminated and restored as a grassy front yard area with direct driveway connection onto Nicols Road. Sig uof La and Omer - Address of Property CEDgR C,it a7 C / / L3 62 le) /V r i a S (�c L 6 13 2 /11a Ly Q2 LS 82 L 7 (3 2 I ' ,i a _ I e/,,� 11 r t</ tr y,N n'V �. r. =.•i 'rr� , . `•' C ' ! f 0 ': a✓'4 r,r �atN. , / 1 y J � /A ' 7Q ' ' 4.a 4 o ��t , /, i I it _ r ,• _ • r to �; t ••. Ir L ',' L,:u Am • , ,L '• �. t, +I, t 7 t f W . q is 'r ,r J '� ,I Q � ,C � ' II •j r , ' .,"'._ JL r > if ` ,•SAPPHIRE LANE e a tA, r•,r t, •• T4, w - ..��n :•:Ti:;1 t, a ! ,r r, •'s f .t •!—.JJ� 'Lr FM JI re I; � Ma rr r.' "y � .)� , LU —y- . K . c ,s a ,.1,•— • fey • •I � 1, �_ if to `•• to .' t . ` rf' �' 4q ,. �A •� `"Ly, tie " la10 14 11 I I L'„ , f •r l� t / ,, e a t .. r •`\ s r • ' / It to ' .. ,J ..,, 't Arr,� �' Up,r•' .r �r 7• t u it to r ro / G la "►'$ 4 ( x 9QNp w1 s ' f • 11 • rt �" ` //yyFRK �\:` t Z12 CON LANE LLJ rrr—a °o t Q /I r1 :rt U to r• q r7 n q r1 n.t 0 9 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Seven CONTRACT 82-6 D. Contract 82-6, Change Order #1 (Deep Well #7) -- During the construction of the City's deep well #7, further evaluation deter- mined that the proposed 16" casing should be replaced by an 18" casing which would allow greater flexibility in future pump design when this well is ultimately to be developed and used. Although the construction of an 18" casing liner is $1,338 more than the 16" casino included in the original contract, this additional cost will be more than made up by the savings in cement grouting to be installed between the 18" liner and the 24" drilled hole. The overall net impact on the contract will be an overall net savings of approximately $500. However, because this change in design results in a change in the scope of the project, a formal change order must be processed at this time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 82-6 (Deep Well #7) for an additional $1,338. GRADING PERMIT - T.H. 55 E. Grading/Excavation Permit, NWk of Section 2 (T.H.55 - McLean Property) -- The City has received an application for a grading and excavation permit to place approximately 250,000 C.Y. on the property located as referenced on page 30 This work would be performed by the Johnson Brothers Construction Company which is presently doing the grading operations for the R.E.S. grading permit and also performing the grading work for the City of Eagan on the Kollofski and Schindeldecker property around O'Neill Pond by Blue Gentian Road. The McLean Hudak property is located just westerly of the present grading operations. All application fees, bonds, insurance certificates and grading plans have been submitted, reviewed and approved by the Engineering Division. All requirements placed on the previous excavation permits by Johnson Brothers would also apply to this requested permit. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the grading/exca- vation permit for Johnson Brothers Company over the McLean -Hudak property (NW4 of Section 2, T.H. 55). 25 N.W. VISSEC, 2, T 21T, R 23 ...... ..... N7, I . ....... BERNARD H C WTT %UftV MKQTAcou. "MEW, Eft. - MCLEAN ,HUDAK 410 040 f HOM- 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Eight PROJECT 369 0 F. Project 369, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Shef- ""'°""'"field —Addition '=—'Streets & Utilities) -- The City has received a written request from the developer of the Sheffield Addition to have the City install the required public utilities and streets to service this proposed subdivision. .:!�\a.,.,.t'ex71A-nY:"• . et>S4-'hn,,.�..,-•V<; •- - ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 369 (Sheffield Addition) and order the preparation -gf a feasibility report. UP 9-46 •- - . -^ 1 sir .... z - • 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Nine PUBLIC HEARINGS PROJECT 297-R - FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING A. Project 297-R, Final Assessment Hearing (Blackhawk Lake Outlet) -- On September 7, the City Council formally vacated the final assessments for three property owners as levied at the July 20 Council meeting due to irregularities in the notification of the original public hearing held on May 20, 1980. Subsequently, a new public hearing process was initiated for these three indivi- duals with a public hearing for this revised project being held on October 5, 1982. At this meeting, the public hearing was closed, ;-u-,%,the project approved and the final assessment roll received with the final assessment hearing being scheduled for November 9, 1982. The "following parcels and ownerships being included under this ublic6hearing ,•process dare — =� •- .,, •- �'�.• 1 T o- :i. ,+�a�:.�ar.F ,,,. cx °Sp,�'-'S; me+ii:--o."+rtMaw�m.e.�=-�. - - Parcel.,u; 10-,02100-010-04 (Floyd and Victoria Bryant) - 10,-727 .for y7 42 acres "Parcel #10-02100-010-02 (David Ashfeld) - $19,652 for 13.27 r .-cr?'rs+�;'�5�'"'�7'��P�.a.�r'=�!;av 3. Lot 7, Block _1, King's Wood Addition (James Horne) - T-- $561.'- 4. Lots 1-6, 8-10,. Outlots 1-3, King's Wood Addition (Horne Dev'el6pment''Corporation'-_-$11,173.24 5. Parcel #10-02100-010-01 (Horne Development Corp.) - $31,857.17 for 26.89 acres. These final assessment rates were calculated in accordance with the 1980 trunk area storm sewer rate of 3.4¢ per square foot it accordance with present City policy pertaining to large lots. However, no additional costs have been included for any potential property appraisals that may be required to objectioning property owners wishing to pursue their assessment through an appeal process. Similar to the Thomas Lake trunk storm sewer assessment, the Council may wish to consider allocating an additional $100 per legal parcel to cover the cost of property appraisal analysis that will be re- quired for any objection and/or appeal. Enclosed on page is a reference map identifying the parcels in question by their respective reference numbers for the Council's information. Because two different Council actions will be required depending upon the property owners' response to this final assessment hearing, the following two alternatives are available to the Council as deemed appropriate by the circumstances that may prevail. 32- 0 • Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Ten A. Close public hearing, approve the final assessment roll and authorize certification to Dakota County. B. Receive and acknowledge all written objections submitted, authorize a property appraisal analysis and continue the final assessment hearing until a later date. ?*All appropriate,. -notices have been forwarded to the affected property owners and published in the legal newspaper pertaining to the recent ...,-owners ' public hearing and the November 9 final assessment hearing. A"1� 4 -ACTION "TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: ,J,;.,",,,action pertaining to alternatives A or B. - .. .sMl�1As;•p.W.kY:.ls'^.J�,�•-a•.F......-.ve�.�--.,_� _. To take the appropriate _•.. .. _—.t., 33 ' "i•. V ND ` +r :E•t+n cgyi.+� "V,�L`+vGc�!rYv4st ysax 4: -an s y.. � e i'+• r. tit" � Iw / :7•_. I _ �. ZiRWME'y �JW YNfl M WISiROMOR azo-ec Jc+ ..`PRC DR reKA o (E'NS J -u t 'MBUBsx `'sv3i L°j'et-.�% � } •" �', f:4., 1 �, S yy a �. r-�[r ¢ S nC _ : ,� - _ � Jx•-r: a rr'4. .,e /)Lrzj Ae.. • Ke //y oro -o7 =r-7 aeo�y� oo�yhe.-fy a / Neomd G. /lainau/f TRUMAN e. WP.YVER '0 - � / Oro -oµ t O y ' 07e -07 a j )oe SECTION Z --- Oi o•ol ToMN p 1 i r l A /6o o - 6 �' :Az r are, ii:. '%'• : it ;•v ci Ff14 J H O IZ NE lYC LO P M E NT .D a y `lt"^�`.7�`'r'31 -, ss ry-�tt�dx. • Li .. 2 4 i. A•JQMXV .A O �k.49ltN �.�+irnaY....-`H,5'_�.-.;v+'.r1!i..-�u�C�c-� _....�• y..,c:..r,::sv .-i __....'i aSG:�`-� •-.w;�r, ... , •, �C -•-_. .._Q•0." _ ' "i•. V ND ` +r :E•t+n cgyi.+� "V,�L`+vGc�!rYv4st ysax 4: -an s y.. � e i'+• r. tit" � Iw / :7•_. I _ �. ZiRWME'y �JW YNfl M WISiROMOR azo-ec Jc+ ..`PRC DR reKA o (E'NS J -u t 'MBUBsx `'sv3i L°j'et-.�% � } •" �', f:4., 1 �, S yy a �. r-�[r ¢ S nC _ : ,� - _ � Jx•-r: a rr'4. .,e /)Lrzj Ae.. • Ke //y oro -o7 =r-7 aeo�y� oo�yhe.-fy a / Neomd G. /lainau/f TRUMAN e. WP.YVER '0 - � / Oro -oµ t O y ' 07e -07 a j )oe Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Eleven ORDINANCE CODIFICATION B. Ordinance Codification -- Approximately one year ago, the City Council authorized Municipal Ordinance Codifiers, Inc., to recodify all City ordinances. Recodification of City ordinances consists of compiling all existing ordinances into respective chapters of a City code document. Each of the ordinances has been reviewed and updated to be consistent with current laws. Further new ordi- ,.,nances that have been recently adopted by the City Council will be incorporated into the ordinance codification. The chapters ,f„0,,,;to,be considered in the codification are as follows: General Provisions and Definitions Applicble to Entires Code Including Penalty for Violation .General!Government ilc-a:&Utiiities -: Rules Wand .VRegulations, Collections isti^uction `Licensing , Permits and Regulations, Including ;nes ' �,{v-.-Licensing, tions'�and°$ ,,M obile.,Vome Parks,,..,, M _ ��" .. : �� t• _Beery, Wine and Liquor -Licensing and Regulation _._.. 6. Other Business Regulation and Licensing n. .. -»£tii,4t!a7lio�aMTd ...y a.�<•.e.-ms •_•r.::,^ -".Y`':.-3:. • �S^. _ :is' Stree s an Sidewalks'benerally - Iy*.-''.tea%' 1~•...,.8. Traffic Regulations '9.—,Parking Regulations - 10. Public Protection, Crimes and Offenses 11. Land Use Regulation (Zoning) 12. Flood Plain Regulation 13. Subdivision Regulations (Platting) 14.-19. Reserve Chapters 20. Listing of Uncoded Ordinances in Effect Predraft and postdraft sessions have been attended by City Council representative, City Councilmember Egan, City Attorney Hauge and City Administrator Hedges. Also included for parts of those ses- sions were each of the respective department heads who have reviewed 3S 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Twelve with the ordinance codifiers ordinances that relate to their depart- mental operations. Any substantive changes have been previously reviewed with the City Council and the appropriate action taken iith"the-'same recommendations provided to the codifiers. The time commitment and cooperation that was given by City Council -member Egan has been greatly appreciated and has provided the City Council an on hands legislative review of the entire process. A public '•hearing is not required for an ordinance codification; however, was deemed appropriate by the City Council for the purpose of providing the public with an opportunity to raise any questions the purpose or need for ordinance codification or questions that might relate to the content of the revised ordinances. Copies __*0, K rof all chapters are on file in the office of the City Administrator and have been available for public inspection. The information is too lengthy to copy. ---However, City Councilmember Egan has had omplete;.wcopy,,t�+as.:,well:.-as ,City Attorney_Hauge, -,of all Lchapters orr�review purposes.,4The Municipal Ordinance Codifiers will: -'proceed withaf nal publication•,,of,4the:ordinance -codification and ,the ef- ective%date-gof- the- new City =.code -will be -January 1, � 1983. :,Copies _. 'f -the'V ew `City 'code will --be made available •`in early December due o `the ''fact that it =will be necessary for the City Council to "prove- `n�osdnancetoneof„the ;early meetings _in December. -that effectively adopts the ordinance codification.ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve final printing of the City code for purposes of proceeding with the final public hearing and adoption of an ordinance adopting the new City code. 3-°"`.- _- .'A•s .+.nGs�.,s�.a e,,.r.3Ni.. S;.'y` :. .. .-YryW1 a.'"5A.'.[ Rafid",y\'FT'C�NJ,��.. -rt\.{I�.. u.u,. r� -.L !' [a.•:. r, - 36 .,94 •. 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Thirteen HOUSING PLAN MODIFICATIONS C. Housing Plan Modifications -- As the City Council recalls, "'action "was• taken -at a recent City Council meeting to consider a mortgage revenue bond program utilizing the Dakota County HRA. The program is the Senior Citizens/First Time Homebuyer Program that is to be authorized by the Dakota County HRA and would make mortgage money available in Eagan, Mendota Heights and West St-. Paul. In order that the program meet requirements of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, it was necessary that the Cities of Mendota � ,..Heights and West St. Paul adopt a housing plan, and in the case of Eagan that the current housing plan be updated and appropriately »sbamended. ..A public hearing was set for the November 9, 1982 meeting for the purpose of considering revisions and modifications to the "existing housing plan. Enclosed without page number due to the length�f t�e,-document s_Ta_,,copy _of "the w:revised ,.housing .plan. here,are apo changes , to :the housing plan (pages 1-36) -as it has = fisted;.,howeve,r,,,an.,addition -to the housing plan described as pagesZ_-40.awas='added to provide information about the single family multi-fam11y•4housing program with some detail on the 1983 single family tax exempt bond program. Again, any modification to the usin�gplanannotbecome .effective until after approval by the ity'Counc'i1 review by the Metropolitan Council, and, finally, ,review bye the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. In summary, the pagesto review"are pages 37-40 which briefly describe the program that is consistent with the proposed Dakota County HRA mortgage revenue bond program.. _The order of business to be considered is: 1. :,Adoption of the housing plan at the November 9 meeting. 2. Adopt a resolution (see enclosed on page 3? ) setting "�a public hearing for either the Decembero�ember 21 meeting to consider the program as proposed by the Dakota County HRA which is designed to provide senior citizen/first time homebuyers with mortgage money. Copies of the program will be available at that time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider approval or denial of the housing plan as revised and approval or denial of establishing a public hearing for the senior citizen/first time homebuyer program at either the December 7 or December 21 meeting. 37 0 RESOLUTION No. 0 Setting Public Hearing on Housing Bond Program WHEREAS, the City of Eagan (the "City") is interested in developing a first- time homebuyer/senior citizen housing program along with the Cities of West Saint Paul and Mendota Heights and the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"); and WHEREAS, the City is interested in authorizing the HRA to sell housing revenue bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 462C (the "Act") in order to provide loans to the purchasers of housing units sold by senior citizens and other c > -housing units in the City; and WHEREAS, the Act requires the adoption of a Housing Bond Program (the "Program") after the holding of a public hearing, after published notice at least 15 days prior to the date of the public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN: -- - - -- — a public_ hearing on the proposed Program - is set for iR9 At n_m- in thn r.mmnil r%amhnwc . - 2. That the -City Clerk is directed to publish the following notice of hearing once at least 15 days prior to the public hearing in a newspaper KOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING -- FOR A HOUSING BOND PROGRAM NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Eagan City Council will meet in the s . s:__ City Hell 1982, and conduct a public hearing pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.01, et seg., as it relates to adoption of a Housing Bond Program for the City of Eagan. This program will describe the housing needs of the City and will describe a program for the issuance of housing revenue bonds to meet said needs and other matters required by Minnesota Statutes. Chapter 462C. Persons desiring to be heard on the proposed program may address the Council. Further information regarding the program will be available at the office of the City Administrator after . 1982. Adopted this 8th day of November, 1982. Attest: City Clerk M Mayor 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Fourteen L SETBACK VARIANCE - BRADLEY HANSON Bradley W. Hanson for a 10' Setback Variance to ConstFuct a Garage 20' from the Right -of -Way of a Public Street Located on Lot 22, Block 1, Wilderness Run 3rd Addition -- A public hearing y• was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their regular meeting held on September 28, 1982 to consider an application that was submitted by Bradley W. Hanson requesting a 10' setback variance to consider a garage 20' from the right-of-way of a public street. Questions were raised at that public hearing as to whether other variances have been granted in the area as they relate to front yard setbacks. Also, there was a concern about the attitude and "Position—of the adjacent -property -owners and it was recommended hataca petition ""-4- presented-or-neighbors be present to state their r < pinion;about,Mr�pHanson.'s_;proposed garage„addition.`-;,;,Therefore. n «s- �recommenai. 1."' -Enclosed on Mr. Hanson and until.�the_,,October ..26, ;;,1982 meeting at ,,which .s...reconsidered.;�The:,Advisory ;Planning -Com-; denial.,of the variance request to the 'City ages "4b through 4 3 is a copy of the 4Alsotenc�ed,is a copes a revised report through"46 '. Enclosed on page' ¢' is tes which pertain to this item. A pet- on -last Advisory Planning Commission meeting a copy of that document is enclosed on pages _ ,V&i Ot' „..ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or -deny the recom- mendation of the Advisory Planning Commission to deny the applica- tion as presented by Mr. Hanson. 39 0 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE _ APPLICANT: ''BRADLEY'W. HANSCN LOCATION: IAT 22, BIACR 1, WILoMoMS FDN 3RD ADDITiCNF. ra " 1281 VIIDMW DRIVE ` EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT) ° = DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: SEPTEMBER 28, 1982 1110'DATE OF REPORT: ' SEPTEMBER 23, 1982 REPORTED BY. DALE C. KnaE, CI'T'Y PIANmm 10' vea an applica co from Mr. Hanson 'to see' if he could build a cja . rage 20' from the right-of-way vs. the 30' setback requiranent in an R-1 (Resi- 'q x�,3de[itiaT`Siiigle'District) : "Presently,- Mr: Hanson has a two -car garage construct- ed onstructed in a tuck under fashion presently existing on his single family hone. Mr. _`_Ha nson is wishing to convert a portion of this existing garage into a family man wand iecvnstnict)?the�Vtwo-car: garage 20' :ifram the right-of-way of a public street yYThe garage would then project 10 additional feet out into the front yard than ,,.what the garage presently - is now. In reviewing the site plan, if the portion of the garage is converted to a fargily roam, there would be no possible way the new �..w..�..garage could be attached to the side of the house. On the easterly side,, the applicant has the 10' side setback and 16' on the westerly side so there is no feasible way the garage could be attached to the side of the house. Staff has reviewed the applicant's request,and in the field inspection, all houses presently have a 30' setback to the house or the garage on Vildmark Drive. This request would then have one structure protruding 10' out in front of the rest of the houses on Vildmark Drive. In reviewing this application, there appears to be no physical or unique characteristics to this lot over any of the other lots with- in this neighborhood. Therefore, it appears that this request is in regard to an economic hardship which would allow Mr. Hanson to add additional square footage to his existing home and still allow him to have an oversized two -car garage. If approved, the variance should be subject to the following conditions: 1. All other ordinance requirements shall be met. DCR/jach .O • • a V JA..i Lr` a 'YYt O12536 1 LArH�_ - _ .an J OV TIOT Ct jt.:F Ry or 69c yo\�.� a o w ql ds.sr Bf.t a e�% net -)a n -a •_ Y " - _� m IS ^ of � 't' �O ?_O.91 I• > ' X194 ,• 3 b rve,s 7� _ w+.rG O� SI m 3e x9 a.8 27 x6 + L I! 17 e w Ic .• QIU n.9s {y • D I I O t° rS '10'�V N +N 0 1 i 101- ,� V �, s u b £. •o, .' IY�. gT asst B .0 ` ��o rtB7 re FYI 0 3.] Bl ' i °. ).• yv I w 2 N 1� n61'ai s•7 >+ .• .' •• 19 a � � z3 ? ~v� 81 1 21 ZL 7 0S•at iu.a. I O is -sp wl 7•�t• so LT.11 TdP LB Su ryes 2v3. 111 _��•. wrf� r.P °� I - •1•Y'•f'. ut'I?•r ' mn. • B _ +,0 r `.-•ya..e..,... 589•a. 56'E9 r eu �r I . .. •.�a.WILD£RNESS'RVIV ROAD les.rB Toc•• f°�;,L•s+' m. .: � 191 '.IB1 r -"•IN a-....,.le[tl a hoe Oa BB 8a.00 N.!`.V:-• w {i �1 1�0 h ..tl n ` e� 2q e�':z's v w N ob I4 q e0 20 O: --- b - p E ES v 19,x' a 20; 1 r?�.6-•' v I St � IJ .)'/ � p a Py � .' •]+[Pof)' \� .InO ey r7 v . ) a1 +�fi ° m 7r i9e ley rof Bo B4 = or1 •e.ap ft liq• ijf '\ O ^0.1 rr:.., 7 s_s� /. ^s.•ss•' T, .�, r B9e r/° 18 9a- •11. ry a B - IJ 4td \y 1 19 ,0 e5w (M a 7e 7e •ee ay r � '! �O 0 .�I +ti -t7 toe Blt7 5 � ± IB y.. ,1!Y' �A`Ma me j o II �\;r 12�'' 7+ A,. ' 17.,r ` •O• `\ -�. § _ - �: a rr Q '16 •�'(0 .P S r 6 o .a .a ' •- y�S es' o' 10 i° 11 1! J s 17 !t: •OYSp` t •I?B �•+i A .BO If:� • $si Is6 t t.n e? % O It ��t0t' �p t s O K w•�y ♦ 1.1� ') 'F. '9 • M p `-plo i•' `b, b '% =4 •° .,.a;,;z,; • �C)°.o ; 'T+ : • * 16 I w w aS'" _Fi tJN ORIvL, O�..;a o*•° . Ifs ,af'lir �.�. =', rY1 -13 t. 'xs�3'"_R;e:7t M .M 'I7t 1f.•t°,�. M °T �sT• � JYre LAey s• , � �m At �tB^ f*•es £iv71 io'_ a \'` L ro + 1.1 12;- Cw 1e• �w u 2 _rY M 3..i"1 Js>o-... �ifr¢ e'T•.! 9 Y.eB�i. a... 14 .31 � t 1 „� , w - ,o ! 1°f•e! na.iY 7 e•S7 0 - IBl.26 - - )1B6.90 f8 rB'ef •'w { _'.-n[S�i •.. vPL �;: iso •rr.d_�. yy, / �," "- O -X "` •. �v'�r��'f �. ,�'•'e?a;s�tf�r e4'ti��". Kn"�sn*}�j��n. i''�r .i." 'L,{ �.�.v. xi t34., �.;,�.. t^ ... _ .»:: y'••�s7a-'-W;e-"�. ._..,..yam___:_ T Z.Z- •___._____ .._...._. 1 p0.E0 it. Y Ie Aft%A QA I- ARNOtO 3870 A r � 20 Aa a 5 b- 1 s lo' � ��5 O% Ii I LZ' Ff Z I •O -�-t=OFZaT��Cf--�13 L)E T TNEA— I I�. 4� m R-1 PF 0 0 I u'��—PIC VE A PF C -3 A R-1 ✓ a� Jam,? _"'NJ� •' �,.a PF Mrt/ -).�- i �_ ��J the' �•�T,��.i PARKVIEW � GOLF:;-y�..�..:J.j:JS.)+•J.j..�i'j%'�'=aJ: \ COURSE :;5 A J?. qF �T'3% r ,�) ). ♦)1 per. J ) r ) :)? I T I �, ) ; .i _if v J'..Ti+,•) 1 YJ r Y': )Jy yJ P K'to 0 0 TO: CHARLES HAIL„ CHAIRMAN AND THE ADVISORY PLANNING, COMMISSION FRCM: DALE C. RUNKIE, CITY PLANNER DATE:--riC TOBER 20, 1982 ' RE: ADDITIONAL, kMON FOR THE ( As directed at the September 28, 1982 Advisory Planning Commission, staff has 1 _.,,,..,researched the variances regarding the Bradley W. Hanson's request for a var- iance on Vildmark Drive. Attached is a memorandum from Mike Johnson, Planning J �a�. :,Intern, who has researched the variance files and parcel files in the City to determine the setbacks on lots surrounding Mr. Hanson's property. Attached is mennrandum for your review. ' -_Staff„hes ret prepared an additional report on the proposed variance request, w ;•,.�, ” please refer to, the .report in the September 28th Advisory Planning Con[nission � -.r .: packet�:for your review. If anyone has misplaced this particular staff report, �+. ��, �'� 'please feel free to contact me and we will mvide with that staff -.:+.�'�.r�,t•.?: ,r w-....�.e w.w:.,,:.-.7a-r�r..,, _.-. .. - .P YoU .Tep�rt' ,�. , 0,06t �':j' taf&is,�inat m ptooess. of.. scheduling the planned developnent review for Nover—. ber 30, 1982 'i November 30th is the 5th Tuesday of the month and staff is in- viting both City Council and Advisory Planning CaTmission. Please mark your " --'calendars accordingly for this special meeting. �V _�;-•:If�anyone �would like additional information regarding this packet or have ques- kfions agenda,' please feel free to oontact me at theC3.Hall. Si noerely, Dale C. Runkle City Planner =Ugg MWIN 4q FROM: PIrANNING INTERN JOHNSON Y M: -'VARIANCE - MR. BRADLEY W. HANSON Pursuant t0 your request, City staff has researched the iters In question re- "" x garding the 10' setback variance for Mr. Bradley Hanson. An investigation of this site and a review of our building inspector's files have produced the following information: :ir'xF _.: .+'-- >"• .-.- r DISTANCE FROYl GARAGE DISTANCE FROM ADDRESS LEGAL TO PROPERTY LINE GARAGE TO CDRB Dr. (Lot 24, WOL295 i lc3marlc Dr ' (Lot 25,; Block 1) 43 •err " �'7?q1-T:..,'h``. W?:S7e'i Wilderness Rum 3rd " !!! ! 10""!*JO Addition (Sec.27 •Q 44 5' , MC,.}N2--` 42.8' yv ' -44.7' 54.7' you,;ean=see..fron-this. data, :a 10' variance would result in the Hanson garage being located 21' from the property line and 34' from the curb. The proposed -;_ garage extension would also be located 8.7' closer to the curb than any of the others listed above. Staff also examined the variance file to determine if any other variances had been granted in this particular area. The only variance found in this area was a request by Mr. Arnold A. Carlson, 1295 Vildmark Dr., for a 26' side lot building variance (see attached). It was approved by both the Planning Commis- sion and the City Council. No additional variances were located in this area. Should you have any questions regarding this variance or would like further in- formation, please contact re. MJ/jack A -S' 43OTA $OUTH L/AIE 0i 5EIolr ww �% 571 L; yeb.o7 =5 1-07771 comP9Ny ASE/ryENj q�•p7 - -- _L 30 L z /Bs 7/ �a��Sa �'.:aiK. a ._�_L .�.: .ate'-.-••.-.••y _• t . t•. .• - _ - :. , _I. _. _.-�.._..: -.sem-;.._, 30 yb'•E /B/.7/ �•• t •• sum'_ t ! • tt� t : i 2 :+ 676.6= C p1of•8� �' ego, 2y-,.Z. \ ~ ° SB9°S9'6f'E I e.I7esf'/f - /iob oo � ,w.a•,;u ar:;, .:�•• 06.69 . ayi o \ : •, .4/?. CFi o a8788 84-00 _ f 70.89 g�i7 •A°e !f�C �q k mrxwe� a r _ _ ' • i�% o\ - Man na7 {� $ y°a o �bf y0 c W ,�j v •:bbe'/2 ,\ Ip C=Bld'/ ^ts 'A -t �. + -./e-off h - ' ,,; 4n •_ , yi:�h lIt t'�Rat' M h .i-�..§, tp7e.db d p1 i•,_al :'tom h Met, h $ - a SeufN L/A/Lr \N NOFryEBN STATES 24 19 a •a=12../7 ° .io •. �i p7 rb _- • c=7iys •.b •,�. N89 S9'SS N/ -a��) b4• .\1 � 9y y5_.•,d,,�°�°°�,��'evhq ' . e : )!.8 •'n'i �SL6B_•1s3�f'-`o 18ILDMA'RK - 0/ � ^ •a1��1' 7-67.oy /oo.ao=1. " � _ /00.00 _ YS.00 iB �. Vic. o. � \p i c 3 �1• �,. � i I ;o h 30 � � 11 �iy �� a•,,e �"k_ �y pD , �p5,4 ooby1°/ e � 8i �� u I eq=Q qy , �1166op5 �\ po ro. p1'.o 0 0 0 / .�' 't •1 - .{ e'\� \° R A rJ 6c,6 f i0 . •a�° • 3 0 ` ale° ? Q �" /n' \i �5•00� Q `* h�'4e •�e3 Z' 4° Al ti a /32.80 a �3. v•� y�� m'.^ / c 9'a4M1 � D \. I\ It13.0 o5•.E � � o0 3)y\)-. 7..2.3 / J_ F- o ? •o r \�n Co :E NBB S7•/V"E x-60i-'i rw �6� bT Oa d I NCO '] h b ae_ =yld; 1 �• erne. O=30o" V I O an p 13 .71 /to V V �~ o 3 5p0 e IS %g00ti� \ r a ni >r3 Nt�2:. °�56 g!P / Y� �J6 •ss f'v-=;',•fi5 ,�a 3 z �B0 C, �°�;1\8wf3_oryLA'� 9/ oa 14 Bs 1B.*�• c'S• ZOS.00 /62.00 96.90 .... $EC. 27- T-7.\/-223 (/ Q'�C- 4� C7 APC Minutes October 26, 1982 BRADLEY HANSON Chairman Krob then reconvened the public hearing regarding the applica- - ticn"of Bradley W. 'Hanson for variance on Lot 22, Block 1, Wilderness Run 3rd Addition, 1281 Vildmark Drive, to construct a garage 20 feet from the right- of-way of a public street with a 10 foot setback variance. Mr. Hanson was present and submitted a petition from neighboring property owners who had "'Opposed the project at the last meeting and now appeared to favor the project. _ ..,He stated that he had met with each of them individually and none of them had objections. He claimed economic hardship in that it is not practical to expand his house to the rear because of the steep terrain in that direction. There were questions from Planning Commission members concerning the appear- ance in relation to other homes in the area and the possible concern of neighbors that the addition will generally conform but it appeared that peti- - mo=tioning neighbors desired to have the application conform with the ordinance -,generally accepted orisat•-least_-conform _•with-' enerall ted standards in the area. 4 Mr. _Hanson stated gn1ingrease.in,family size and more room needed are reasons for the expansion, and..,alsoeto.. improve ..the aesthetics of -the home. i<Member Mulrooney " questioned whether -:there was only -convenience -or whether there was any actual `the ?r", 'hardship to applicant and stated '.'that'it did not appear that there was an ''actual hardship __After discussion, Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the . 1 of on -£'moo ecommend_denial.of41be.application because of.lack of hardship 'shown, according to Ordinance standards for variance purposes from existing setback requirements. There_was.clear concern among Planning Commission bens Whehe tr the neighbors continued to object, in light of the wording on the consent petition. Member Wold stated the land was not conducive to add -� a• -.the addition to the rear and it would a _ .��„�„_��_,�__ appear to be Pair to the applicant to r,,,-4 _, ,, _ ollow the construction oa *the"front'side of the house. Those in favor were ;aRr�Mulrooney, Wilkins, Turnham and Krob. Those against were Wold, Bohne and McCrea. ADJOURNMENT McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to adjourn at 8:10 p.m. Secretary 4-7 3 PHH 0 0 Dom. as ig�a ZIO 4 /a 77 dd.0;..�1cor Yfa J.�& 7F % ko_ ZY/V . W.&IIET-1 ...�cS'•�"`W' Irv!!.! //L-�!2i�i�\i(i.V ,' 'if�'iJ�� ✓r s��/ L�-�!�ZZ%�'G�_/ ....... m *0 0 is . W.&IIET-1 ...�cS'•�"`W' Irv!!.! //L-�!2i�i�\i(i.V ,' 'if�'iJ�� ✓r s��/ L�-�!�ZZ%�'G�_/ ....... m *0 0 is 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Fifteen TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS - COUNTRYSIDE BUILDERS B. Temporary Advertising Signs for Countryside Builders, Inc. ^^�='=-Countryside -Builders, Inc., has requested temporary advertising signs to be located at six (6) locations throughout the City for the purpose of advertising Oakwood Heights which is located on Wilderness Run Road. The applications were reviewed by the Building Inspection Department and appear to be consistent with the intent of the sign ordinance. For a copy of the sign locations and a picture of the sign, refer to pages $1 through """ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the tem- m+�PorarY 'Advertising signs for Countryside Builders 'Inc.,to be issued in accordance with the sign ordinance. . iHab:A's:GGI:VG,YF�Ak..li.�-re�ra• ':;s.rr.-w � ...., .._. .. ..u.aD+...=oMus+....+ -. -... — ,. .. - sv i7vA.}i:.r•,�'"�.;dFkF.c'ax;:r 4..—�^=r�er.'�;.._n+..T._:K'ww �d+ij•t:�r:_ni :5.; . 0 SIGN LOCATIONS Temporary Advertising Signs SW Corner of Pilot Knob & Cliff NW Corner of Hwy. 3 s Cliff SW Corner of Lexington & Wilderness Run . NW Corner of Dodd 6 Wilderness Run. NW Corner of Cliff & Dodd ' - SE Corner of Dodd S County Road 30 0 4' x 8' 2 sided 4' x e' 2 sided 4' x 4' 2 sided' 4' x 4' 2 sided 4' x 4' 2.s ide.d i 4 x 4' 2 sided tt 2 L \� ..r- . (DIFFLEY ROAD) a""� '" COUNTY ROAD 30 M WILDERNESS RUN .Wj X Ck s CLIFF ROAD SI 0 r PRO - Painter will do "sanething" with arrow, mi.lage, and phone! Signs at SW Corner of Lexington & Wilderness Run NW Corner of Dodd & Wilderness Run NW Cozner of Cliff & Dodd SE _Corner of Dodd & County Road 30 . Will have the layout shown above. - Signs at: SW Corner of Pilot Knob & Cliff NW Corner of Hwy. 3 7 Cliff Will have the layout shown above with the addition of "Manor Homes/ Townhomes For Sale - 2 & 3 Bedroom, etc." sk 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Sixteen LONE OAK HEIGHTS PRELIMINARY PLAT EXTENSION C. Lone OakHeights, Consideration of Preliminary Plat Extension (Orrin Aune`)_ ==-'As the Council may recall, on October 19, the final plat for the Lone Oak Heights Addition was formally revoked by Council action due to the developer's non-compliance with the re- quired financial guarantees. It appears that the developer is still unable to secure the necessary financial guarantees required by the City. Therefore, enclosed on page ,S9- is a written request submitted by the developer asking twat Eris preliminary plat approval be extended for a six month period of time until April 5, 1983. Also enclosed on page 5 S is a layout of the �'_'>•preliminary plat. The original prelim na�lat was" approved by Council action on April 20, 1982 with the final plat receiving approval on August 17 and ultimately being revoked on October 19, 71 j1982: fherefore;4-in accordance -twith present City ordinances, if he mfinal.;:plat,4is..not .approved "within six months of preliminary MR11at pprovals44the ..preliminary : plat is null.and void unless an tension1 s'gr""anted-'by :Council -;action yACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the e.quessvorasix month ,extension to the Lone Oak Heights preli- minary plat. ' 53 ��0 0 JW dwedern �saocaafes o/ Ch. 9../ pp1410 -r.., 04� 2d. ✓//`..,sola 55125 452-6464 :..,;..H.r, Mr. Thomas 4. Colbert, P. E. Director of Public Worcs „City of Eagan 3995 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minn 55122 - :” ' Re: Lone Oak Heights .:;�+ .: G ++R r�-_.-�Hvrikve c''t•S� �..�. , rte.. r- sma•� .+-`.L"1 � Fro�.� ..+i _+r�.ii r�a��_ Dear Mr. Colbert : �.. r5 T ould ylike ..to request that our preliminary plat approval be',dxtended for 6 -month period of time, to allow us to comply with the financial requirement that was set on August 17, 1982, by the Eagan City Council. K,,lwould also like to confirm o-ar phone conversation � .r on Oct. 29, 1982 pretaining to the abandonment of the well located on the.Lone.oak Heights project. Please be. a - informed that we have contracted with Keys Well Drilling Co. of St. Paul to accomplish the abandonment of the well. <...�..«•..sdr z^i;K}o-'xi-;4}1'4•..'-�:• ,,.. ,, ,...w°'k'•-rg�$a�..fr�Yr iter.+•. -i ;.��ey�>, .'=". _ -. .. .6 .: _. Midwestern Associates of St. Paul, Inc. Orin Aune President kka s4 �'�•• .r4 0 1' �•`Y Ali LONE OAK HEIGHTS 4. ' 1 til i, nje •'e7C .. 1 Alt • B --" _ ?;:.7i1' C (-- • i, E%e CEYi3 `Np ! [-�„o"¢ wr NAJ —� ,.i: 'Y ._::.:�.•. . .... •? •'. w,er� `w•diiir�i� -. •gNiTe e••E �'E j"v et o. •. I y I E • `' �Y • ".. •• . 'tet OU , o f •\i O ; 1 4 �•♦ OUTLOT� '�\ t, t,•,�r_i: N t%-bi»,Ao'A;I•- ', ..,...•, .. A. � • @.,—''ice:• .. ��, ' �' .,rte '� ptoe Ai 'P•., . Y. y I u Mw YWIf»011W'TWIAuy..M.s\\y m bo 0 , r EXCEPTTION, `C aS IH �A ON, wool .} i e.•.eAn,1, A. 11 F r . «.�.,.InwrAesvirj 1 ••. S e i alley R LAKE, erlay Co., Inc. :1 AAIEp LAKE, YAp[70TA j v tiv" �5r • A m y�a • VOL r. 91 ,.sN • t. H e LL oo ie C EXCEPTION NO 2 uO Cr y IZ e31 .6 i� •• jj S 3 T o L, wl ' b )I 2 OF 2 SHEETS . 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Seventeen HILLTOP OF EAGAN FINAL PLAT D. Hilltop of Eagan, Consideration of Final Plat Approval (Develo- "per's 'Construction) -- The Public Works Department has received an application for final plat approval for Hilltop of Eagan (former- ly Hilltop Condominiums). All conditions placed on this plat at q� :the time of preliminary plat approval have been complied with and this final plat is now in order for formal consideration by Council action. All required bonds, applications fees and final plat material have been reviewed and approved by City staff. Enclosed page —Z is a copy of the final plat. ,?�7a-r��Y--ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the final . plat for Hilltop of Eagan (Developer's Construction) and authorize _,..,_plat a' "` the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents for re - co ding'=at"`Dakota County •o^e�Rs�gNW4x��...l..i�Sh{� l�A �F'Ir !. 1MTS M �- - 1:I -. ] &�7 .. 7 .•flRJCww+.rJh�/iol'A.w��up :+�.... ....�_-r-4=�s:: •.�.�— .. 5(� I -.... HILLTOP 4'•4 `•\ •Yxl,•.IY. LN NUUI 11 b• NNNN� � r •I •IY•I.. i%•�✓1 I Ya I, 111MIW 11 .II II. YN IN. I �. • Y••1 11.1.1.1.. Ial1� 1� ...1.1, ..rv.r� I•Ix... I �, Aqui UI W I- S l9 W D. F - j J .z F Y •w •u• •j ••. x913 I. i O • IwIN •L .IL b YNC[ Be /' W 1 . LI • �f1•�•W �wY1fW Z Q 1 J j ' I 1 r•rwll.BIl 1 r •GI...1-Qai _Y �1 1• ...0 • '-tia•.in•1- � • \ j•1 LL � S�•I.. u e OUTLOT r A I 6 p L 1,1 r\ � •f1 / I. 'zy\\\` es `' 1,:'4.1. J __�• I :� . -l�.i.•[ -S - �`�n •... n1 it I I xrx. K .r l.t• 1 t. •�`' wo �L§CI I �I I a - - o �L� 1 CI i Yr ;LL .Y Y mOI RYMr[,• T.1 r••:......: •1•n C1, !• r • nlnu •r• r rr`�A GSA I�r �' , t.q. Ily. r.. y!. ., Y. 1.11r4�.. 4N. .,aY.rlf 4 I�J�-. A rf Y•tl• w IhY [f Y:w•1.1; y .1 , 5�P 1, 4 W 11. pm 11 u[ calla C. Lllt[.r Y1nW. • unN Y . .[.[ rin Y n•,. S Z. Y 11[1 L U YNI 1• \M 4114 f . q InaOq Mua H.ny. I,nu•1•. 1 ` i '�" OCATION MAP W W1I ...........w. fu w 491x, .. numr or mY. w Ix. M.N I tt/ 1314 YL Ir:ya•.Ir Y• W1 r h11•111 y 11.1... 4 . I.. 111.1 M II<11. I.L 11, pairs- YYyy N. .wy.n., r Yrn r 1l l.nila 1x Ya1Y • .1.11 1.1x. •11, 1 Ylbx.. n M1r In.ny1 al, llp .n.^..• • • . 141 r i.bl 4 f • :M Yu.Y. 1. wa. L.wN Y .1x1. , . . �'fn.• Y.1. I'tiY Y •1114 J .Mro1 a[ my txulhll L 1 • w u. Yeymly, W � ?ii y� uM wa Y..• nu..;. 1. Y Ig1I N u r 1 .;rl.;x'..i w ...Nrm ..1 1. • 1 l LLr1 91n..I 911..11 r u _ (�1••. �(.{ 1 wy awlwur Y.. b.. �� '1 �f , �IIMy .1y I j • a./ Yw 111. MN..0 p ~ Yu u.Y. [ •b 1.. n l l{1 LR4V 1xx111 YWY. •. •• I.f Y1n.0 Q.. q 1f- n.:Y1Y\N WaI1rw1 w uYx.aw bbn r 1M1 r \ 1 'YY 11 -i`1r.r I-�., .1 x.111 r.1 I.... 111.11 nl• 1 PLI Yu.11a olflur. 1 • MYrra Y3 L... 1 ....• yy f 4 1 Yw a. YryralY..• 11naf W 1n. .IY.nlly, 1{. i_ 5 w r.Ly1ry ) ( If GrN.x• nPm 9.61 NNL Yry Ir) : Wa Lax.1.1 w Mx1M IY Y•Ixa . xa y . 1• .IY x xILN1 y Y3Y. y JI. IYI InI H 1 1 • r 1 rnm..l lW 1. 1n. LY... n1f .: 1bb1n .. xrmin.'i•. MI • n Il 1 In Y•11M xu,r...... ln..f f I. ... .. . r ...... 1 .n11..^. 1• ' ` Y .. Y.1 IM .w.ui Iwxl.r IYn x • m;r L...na 1 Ica..I 1Y1U e1My. 1. Y fn1YYY .inn .w �1 •i YI • L .. YM lu. Y 1 M )Y\ ICWMI. Y r [I nYbn 1. Ufl if If by 1. n. ` ilenlf 191.1 li. Y\1Yy.�a. I Ir „(J 1 YI Y nm[) YUlfr .MI r 1U W If . 11�. m1 L111 ..-it .f WY: uwwYY t , ]f �r U1nu1 4.11.1. Cllr 0•w11 .r YIY. a -NY ��al ili I {{ Jji 'rtlr 01.1. F •:. •: `� 1 : Iu..NM .. C r..r Iu. Y.. r Yw.•4. 4911. w Y. u... I.-,, axuww na w11u., PONDto �r W. 114 Y. 1W g1.IrJ IW ply 11 . u _. -x- 'A. A_ S 7(' } ly. n..[. W..1. c-11 11.1 \ y 1 � n11 II•f M IILL10r r W Y Y. yrnry rV..1. \. Y1n., . 1P4.4..1. tn.'l.r 101 1 ra n L� t � 1 1. \M W..1• C.w. Lyl..w. .111 W11x1. 1M I.r.•.[ . r xlally .r n 1x 11 Lw•11.1..1 r. :� Jij'[ 4 Ir Y.m Cly1. •)w . 1 YI.r r.unl .r .Y L.N . . � I•. .;_�. 11� Cr_ r i llll• _�i 1 h. 91...41_._ \� . •r t� •A". tii (I 1rfw. e..nY r.y e3.n.r Y..r n ( Y YIINy.11Y1 M W Uwfn _. Uj e.wy Iwun, W.... c•wy, Y ..1. � • f1 1 in;;r n`bird ..n.s_.` of ` :�;;:.i"_�i..n;na Yr4 :w`.rinLA u xl .� �j?i. ��'�a�•r.. �i <. !� L.y.r .... N... W.... [.y... Y...... • I � .w...x1...w.wa � I � � ` �- I `� ��Irsl• _ , f j .� 91x1 n•I � - � � I I � �,.- 3 �� •�, HI I. LTO? L.STATE S ' � ppl' Otl•li tl'Y 'I �:.h.. COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY N0. 30 (UIFFLEY ROAD) - ub.•a41: -� - - _ I DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS, INC.' 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Eighteen RICHARD HALLADY BUILDING PERMIT E. Richard Hallady Concerning a Building Permit Application for -'a—Detached'-Storage Building -- Mr. Hallady, who presently, owns Roadway Custom Trailers located at 3248 Terminal Drive, ha's made a building permit application and is proposing to construct a secondary building consisting of approximately 2,000 square feet for the storage of scrap material. In reviewing the application-, it was determined that the lot coverage requirements are not in conformance; and, therefore, a variance is required for considera- tion by the City Council. The City Planner has examined the x5_ _.building permit application and a copy of his findings.and a loca- 3uNtion map are .enclosed on pages _through 6Z for review. --`-'`ACTION TO -BE CONSIDERED -ON 'THIS -ITEM: To approve or deny the .tb9i�ldingTpermit�!variance concerning minimum lot coverage as applied q�r; byjMr. THallady x.atea�3_��i�.�Sa'GYi�?p �fi-�.;+,'�"'es ri-s3f3e2 �'eaS�w� r+41��rc+-.•,.'3. ._t+ - = _lut4ataw.4w'::s�5�'RftJ19RJ.ef.» .Xn ci'v .. _o t.i nnz::-. .. WE • • 1�1•C Y • •. 1 � •• FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: yNOVFMMER 4, 1982 RE: BUILDING PERMIT AUTHORIZATION -..." Staff has received an application for a building permit by Mr. Halladay who presently owns Roadway Custom Trailers located at 3248 Terminal Dr. Presently, Roadway Custam Trailers has a 10,320 square foot building and it wi is proposing to construct a secondary building consisting of approximate- 'ly 2,000 square feet for the storageI —.,,.._-._.Understanding that the building would be pole material. It st staff s g pole building or steel build- ing located at the northerly edge of the lot. In calculating the exist g building and the proposed building, the lot coverage is approximately. -. IDMT 16$;'1or under the minima lot, coverage requirement in an industrial dis- �_ concern staff has is in regard to the secondary building for the stor v tr age of materials._. -The ordinance isn't specifically clear in regard to wissuing%pemiits•for,nca:t than one building per lot. Therefore, for clar- ification, staff would like �. the permit to be authorized by the City Coun- . - cil instead of -'staff-issuing the building permit. - - -- - --- --- -�: As you may be aware, there is a substantial amount of outside storage in ';rscy this.,general„area and the industrial park does not meet the regnirements -"mss ' : " .` set forth in Ordinance #52 in regard to lands g in , concrete curbing, " ..'"bituminous surface or driveways and' parking areas, etc. Therefore, in is- suing the building permit, would the applicant have to adhere to the land - m... .scape requlranents, concrete curbing, etc. or can the permit be issued be- cause the proposed building is helping to clean up the area by putting scrap materials inside of a building rather than storing the materials out- side? Staff is asking for direction from the City Council either to issue or not issue the proposed building permit for the storage building which would contain approximately 2,000 square feet. DCR/jach M 2 -Lw L c 0LL L) U-. J V 4 L, m ME -JTq 57- �T ILr tca$ Ic Fiw- 2 -Lw L c 0LL L) U-. J V 4 L, m ME 41 .:9 ~- :1• R-4� bel• � /iRl M R-4 YYY /r AL LI A -FOX . _;J A - ti�• ` A R-4 N 8 EADO IIstM. /y --� sl MINA LI eU IA Ll E r R-4� /iRl R-4 a LI A -FOX . +� ti�• .� R-4 J. NF _r R Vhl R- I i TA K/00 ADDITION A R -4 I c - 4 RA ►0 OWN 4 1 OW21 N 1; 01! 0 I 0 R-16��N'� R-2 .4, 1' ELmN F")F/,m DG R-4� /iRl R-4 a -FOX . RIDGE ` A R-4 N 8 N drYA 0 R-16��N'� R-2 .4, 1' ELmN F")F/,m DG 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Nineteen SWIMMING POOL ORDINANCE F. Consideration of a Swimming Pool Ordinance -- At the direction 'bf -the --City "Council, the City staff, under the guidance of the City Administrator and research by the Administrative Intern, Mike Johnson, developed a swimming pool ordinance for consideration. The swimming pool ordinance, a copy of which is enclosed on pages _6Ar through 6q , provides regulatory control over private swim- ming pool construction. It also addresses the issue of water run- off from swimming pools to adjacent neighbors which was the concern originally raised by a property owner before the City Council. Public swimming pool construction is generally regulated by the = State Building Code. --`The swimming pool ordinance has been reviewed by the Chief Building Inspector,., City !,Planner ,sand Assistant City , Engineer and .it .meets iSith_;their:,approval.;If the ordinance is to be further considered by-t.athe.eCi•ty.*Council,m the .;City Attorney should provide review and urther Input %�,*Dave Keller -of the City Attorney's office has stated that, --as -"an alternative to an ordinance, it appears that the pro- perty owner next to property with a swimming pool which drained cros.ssithat neighboring property would have an action for trespass and/or damage to property. This type of action would be initiated by the adjacent property owner and apparently could be enforced L'N if a swimming pool ordinance is not adopted. , k T- ACTION TO or deny an posed with BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To either review, approve ordinance regulating swimming pool construction as pro - or without modification. G3 • DRAFT • CITY OF EAGAN DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE REGULATING SWIMMING POOL CONSTRUCTION :,,The City Council of the City of Eagan, Minnesota ordains as follows: SECTION 1. "SWIMMING POOL" DEFINED. =as vzffi --:. `',n'A. PRIVATE SWIMMING POOLS are regulated by this Ordinance and are defined as follows: Any enclosure, designed or intended or used for the con - a " .&ivtainment of water, whether constructed below ground level or above ground - J rra -fRRi4'.�:rri'�.sJ#d- C. t•3•• -=Y`-. 3.,."^Nr4r a -•".a:.. �: ,i. :.x.y '`3 V'a...r'_i-li" N- : .• tau leveling -A' ace area exceeding 100 square feet and a depth ex- sS.�_ y � y _= ce ding 18 inches} which is designed, intended, or used for swimming, 'ac�tu�nw'-y•�:i',S°�".::vC'fv.'�ii�'ae"s:.a-.-�"�, wading, or other recreational use by the owner or tenant of the property '$!f�L'str4�kr.A'-ib..-5i^iaaTs.,n ;^'v'.'--- . .....:.. .. .. ... upon wihhich,nthe pool is constructed, or by their family or invited guests without„payment -of.a fee. 3D1B PUBLIC SWIMMING POOLS are those available to the public at large, or used collectively by numbers of persons for swimming or bathing and which are operated by any person, firm or corporation, whether he or it be owner, lessee, operator, licensee, or concessionaire. Pcols in the following locations are considered public: 1. School property. 2. Hotels and motels. 3. Hospitals and institutions. 4. Municipal parks or buildings. S. Apartment buildings and multiple dwellings. 6. Country Clubs. All structures, appurtenances, equipment, appliances, and other facilities 44 11 • appurtenant to and intended for the operation and maintenance of a swimming pool shall be considered a part of a public swimming pool. SECTION 2. PURPOSE OF ORDINANCE. The purpose of this Ordinance is to provide minimum standards to safeguard life, health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location and maintenance of all swimming pools within the City of Eagan, and certain equipment specifically regulated herein. SECTION 3. ENFORCEMENT OF ORDINANCE. The City Code Enforcement Officer shall be charged with the enforcement of this Ordinance. - - j•.,,, -,SECTION 4. BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED. • w�};;a:q.•�.u-•+6::,8, -,.,,w^,;:=1rst ooLalning a permit rro ,O , , BThe application' for the permi istructed or`established,'and no such mmenced in the City of Eagan, without r:�-t-+- -: t-. :-;-, a iia:. J-• ,.- m the "Building Inspector. t shall include, without limitation, r the following information: ti 1. Complete plans and specifications for the construction of the , 2. A site plan showing the location of all structures on the lot, - including the house, garage, fences, trees, overhead or under- ground wiring, utility easements, and other significant im- provements or natural features; 3. The proposed location of pumps, filters, electrical power source (if applicable), flushing and drainage outlets, and other operations features; 4. Source of water supply; 6S 0 0 S. Location and specifications of protective fencing; 6. Other data as may be reasonably required by the Chief Building Official. C. The Chief Building Official shall have authority to inspect any pool at any reasonable time during the construction and thereafter to etermine whether or not the provisions of this Ordinance are being complied with. The Chief Building Official shall have the authority to enter upon any premises at reasonable times to inspect work per- formed under permits issued by him. �LL��SECTION 5. REQUIREMENTS. ' 5.1. All Districts. . :with'jArticle 680 of the current.national.-e 95" G•rn.Re,':+,tt' n3 uta � v4^ , f�' �ry I:;' AM�,* •k� !n k +iti:41' 1'.f� r�Gi �tr�.irk^'n „iSJ c Y I P ��t ^a;,7igl, B allo pool shall be located within any public or private utility ease 2 r'AA\H,NT M•%y . `}�e:3M$ 4!F ✓TG u F_. - i �nt,wall�way, sngress „or egress easement, .drainage ;way, marsh, or „other location_in,which_it will represent a threat to the natural location „ _ -. environment. - ��i C In the case of underground pools, precautions shall be taken during construction toe 1. Avoid damage, hazards or inconvenience to adjacent or nearby property. 2. Assure that proper care shall be taken in stockpiling excavated material to avoid erosion, dust or other infringements upon adjacent property. D. All access for construction shall be over the owner's land and due care shall be taken to avoid damage to public streets and adjacent private or public property. The owner shall be liable for damages caused to any public or private property. E. To the extent feasible, back-flush water or water from pool drainage W shall be dieted onto the owner's property Pinto approved public drainage ways and shall not drain onto adjacent private land. Drainage onto public streets or other public drainage ways shall require permission of the appropriate local City officials. F. Pool lighting shall be directed toward the pool and not toward adjacent - ��property. G. The pool area shall be enclosed with fencing to effectively prevent --the entrance of children and be without hand or foot -holds that would enable a child to climb over it. The fence shall be at least four (4) •q:rrp'rentW iw5fg-.:.rt{}Y4:.....;:: sr. - . in height, but not exceeding six(6) feet, to prevent uncontrolled -�eL W_l.TH'..c.KKjy M=3�'•Hf A!3"Y al.� - .4 ..: i. .. -. � .. � .. .. access from the street or adjacent property. Such fence shall have closing and self latching gates with provisionsforlocking and a. r T,j 4i'(- •47g -. c.a 'i' �� t .. -- �e. ..i .e C -y4� s ._1 .be completely installed prior to the filling of the pool.-.aq, s .l \ . n . �,i?-","""S " ,s'eYf ate landscaping sfiall be placed between Ae pool area and adjacent ' e; 8 fly.,district Jot lines H. Retaining walls shall be designed to resist the lateral pressure of '-,""the retained material in accordance with accepted engineering practice. ,n,.,F'�r{'{•4r.-„4 iF,{ tyu LL•. T. r' 4-4:, flt .' "^{5;. - ... Walls retaining drained earth may be designed for pressure equivalent ---,to that exerted by a fluid weighing not less than thirty pounds per cubic foot and having a depth equal to that of the retained earth. I. Filling of pools from fire hydrants or other public facilities shall not be allowed by local city officials. J. Pool water shall be maintained in a suitable manner to avoid health hazards of any type. Such water shall be subject to periodic in- spection by the local health officer and/or the Minnesota State Board of Health. K. All electrical wiring, installation of heating units, grading, instal- lation of pipes and all other installations and construction shall -4- G7 0 0 meet state requirements and shall be subject to inspection. L. Nuisances such as undue noise, lighting of adjacent property, health and safety hazards, damage to nearby vegetation and the like shall not be permitted. — ,M. --Any proposed deviation from these standards and requirements shall require a variance in accordance with normal zoning procedures. 5.2. - A. Pools shall not be located within five (5) feet of any rear lot line or within five (5) feet of any side lot line nor within seven (7) feet of -'{yw.�.,+rtyr, o.w'r -r, span •f}+s e.-:-.........o'zJ. - - . t- - .. .. _.... _ any principal structure or frost footing. Pools shall not be located rrF..� i uts � 1 � :.+.y:. �rr� --•cwe++id��v�w� t s-Ccit�r =, . _ - tl M�Sr'KX+'+ Z%-! ;T� .}5r- s':,,?_. �^'i -... r- ....+ ...,G."- -. .yct_'-I. .. _ Y -,t, -�'. r = B ^dThf*bunt, pump, heating unit "and any other noisemaking mechanical equipment shall be located at least fifteen (15) feet from any adjacent or W -V i`'f�`:ii:�1^oc � ,:wn t9! v+b.• .._ . .... x. .., r•v . -. - .. ... M ",IL? -4:O' -:T - nearby residential structure and not closer than five (5) feet to any 1 ' �°a�'�i `�r_al'a'1t,xr B',c;.,✓. a; ry ., i . _F :. r.�� ti . lot line. 5.3. Swimming pools which are intended for and used by the occupants `"7z._s of a multi -family dwelling and the guests of the occupants of such dwelling shall adhere to the following regulations: .«.:.- A. No part of the water surface of the swimming pool shall be closer than ten (10) feet to any lot line. B. No pumps, filter or other apparatus used in connection with or to service a swimming pool shall be located closer than ten (10) feet to any lot line. C. All deck areas, adjacent patios or other similar areas used in con- junction with the swimming pool shall be located at least ten (10) feet from any lot line in an adjacent single-family district. D. Fencing and landscape treatment shall be placed between swimming pool structure and adjacent single family lot lines. SECTION 6. COMPLIANCE WITH MOST STRINGENT REQUIREMENT. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this ordinance and any state law or requirement, rule or regulation of the State Department of Health, the provision imposing the higher standard or more stringent requirement shall be controlling. „•.;SECTION 7. PENALTY. Any person convicted of violating any provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine not to ex- ceed $500 or imprisonment for not more than 90 days, or both, plus the cost of r r prosecution in either case. SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from ��+and arter'its'passage and publication''according to�law°"�'`''�'"�"f"�=^-'r'�'''g ="'�"• �" " ' .u. .•. i..s.. «rn .. '" 7Y �'�".Sfa`e�a,.:enG�':s._... R ni tr� r � '�:i.iF�i-� �� •.ri i ' f• � yY � .�' i d W . T •AI'n f�Ji.' .. � .(. :'��' ],� • .�.•-{ 1w�r:r 'Passed by Ehe City Council this _ day of 1982. %�'. ,. rj :h+'S}'�•M '. '� `t, 41 jiti:.� i1"arT4`.'�e. aj..h J. �i�{ w-. it T'^"�FFt��~Y{h�iy�}`�.SSL>'ir ,�. .i, 'x-11, A:�c = :.•ii��..ry�t7 -e _ . 'r� • 1 vJ �, 4 (Yyl3htre.fnn4 t!hy.r*fl'E.cd•�1"'7.4r,.aY'. �5.7P�r Mi'� f'k� C� Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Twenty C ADDITIONAL ITEMS CONTRACT 82-13 BIDS A. Contract 82-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Brittany 4th & Safari Reservoir Watermain) -- Contract 82-13 incorporated the two following projects under one contract for bidding purposes: ,_. 1. Project #364, Brittany Fourth Addition - Trunk Water Main x ,.,,:2...Project #366-I, Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir - Water ,- Main _ w: •.:,,. - Enclosed on page -71 is the final bid tabulation as received at the formal bid ope nin g held on October 27, 1982. The alternate ..,bid ; rovided ,for-Itadditional-tgrading -subject oto :the -acquisition of„sementsfrom .the property owner in Apple Valley which will provide-•.for=--a-better access grade and road construction to the reservoir prior ..to the installation of this watermain. The City .4`ofEagan "has since been able to acquire at no cost the temporary construction easements from the property in Apple Valley to accommo- da.t6�. his•nbetter.construction access road. The Public Works Depart- 'ment feels strongly that this alternate bid should be considered due.¢;to,,,,i_ts M, better ,accessibility and minimal future maintenance resulting from better drainage designs and gentler access slopes. As can be seen, the low alternate bid is well below the feasibility r•r.r +.report .estimates ^for both.projects. K�W,-'”±ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 82-13 and award the contract to Encon -Utilities, Inc. in the alternate bid $68,367. VAE E Our File No. 49262 BRITTANY 4TH PROJECT 364 SAFARI 4.0 M.C. RESERVOIR TRUNK WA'rFR MAIN 82-13 EAGAN, MN BID TIME:10:30 A.M. C.DA:.T. BID DATE:Wed. Oct. 27, 1982 CQUrRACI'ORS ALTERI>II'1TE BID -1. Encon Utilities Inc. $ 68,367.00 2. Erickson Construction Inc. 76,755.00 3. ' ` En rin 14mtganeiy, `Inc. -'"' ` "` 78.430.00 4. Widmer Brothers 88,448.00 -m1AA.-,WRighar4.Knutson1 A=. w:, r-iomM, 460.00 r� a.. TOTAL BASE BID $67,227.00 73,460.00 75,880.00 81,398.00 ',,106,210.00 = ry M Bid - _ yv�Y 140 Bid ENGINEERS ESTIMATE $77,000.00 r� '�''..u� ✓1`y- 'ti.... �ef�P*�4lTi'.:�4.A� ?l Y''�i 3=rc"4 ..� : r�r.� f,'. _ .— - .. - ,h+t ^FEASIBILITY R1 PORTiF.R.) '`='" I[IV BID 8 OVER (+) (Alt) UNDER (-) F.R. Project 364 $32,230 Project 366-I 48,615 U 2369b %1 $24,210.00 44,157.00 24.9% (-) 9.2% (-) 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Twenty -One CONTRACT 82-14 PLANS & SPECS B. Contract 82-14, Approve Plans & Specifications, Order Advertise- ment for "Bids '(Project 366 -II, Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir) Detailed plans and specifications have been completed and are now being presented to the City Council for their review and approval. While Contract 82-13 provides for the access roads and the trunk water main to the site, Contract 82-14 provides for the construction of the reservoir facility itself. The contract proposal is being set up to provide an alternate bid the inclusion of the lettering "EAGAN" to be painted on this reservoir in three places. The Coun- cil may want to consider between now and the bid opening if they �- want to include this identification lettering on this large reser-' voir at the Eagan/Apple Valley border. The lettering would be similar to that recently •a�pplied to the Univac 0.5 M.G. elevated ROW- �k4-n9.KKi�4�ni%GFv clnR�•�:ar1d< .r: ta::.a.�- w!:�.Y ua y.. +.�+� _ •..wi�.�._r ... ..: oACTION :TO,aBE -CONSIDERED - ON -TRIS -ITEM =To approve "the plans and rr'-specifications for Contract 82-14 (Safari 4.0 M.G. water reservoir) and _order advertisements for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 m. ,on Thursday, December 2, .1982. .�•1(AW. aL1.Y. i'I: i'r4l'� 4i 5V — . •J. SAFARI ROAD ACCESS AGREEMENT C. Approve Joint Use Agreement for Road Access, Safari 4.0 M.G. Water Reservoir -- Enclosed on page 7S is a copy of any agreement -a s „executed by the owners of the property in Apple Valley adjacent ,:•,. ..to.the City of Eagan's access road to the 4.0 M.G. water reservoir. Rather than construct two parallel access roads to adjacent proper- ties, these property 'owners have requested consideration. by the. City of Eagan of joint use of the reservoir access road to their property. These -are the property owners who have granted a tem- porary construction easement. to the City to provide a better access road as discussed under the contract award for 82-13. In considera- tion for granting the easement and assuming maintenance responsi- bilities for this access road, they would like to receive permission from the City of Eagan to use this as access to their property. The Public Works Department has reviewed this request and prepared the referenced agreement for formal Council consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a joint use access agreement for the City's 4.0 M.G. Safari Water Reservoir road and, if approved, authorize the Mayor & City Clerk to execute said agreement. �a 0 0 AGREEMENT • 7• N• I• 11 � It 17 :-YYp\ TEIIS AGREE 4NT, made and entered into (/(-c Gr ( e-f� Z , 19 J °by•and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a municipality of the State of Minnesota (herein - 'after called the CITY), and P11KE AND SHIR= PATTEN, husband and Wife (hereinafter called the FEE OWNERS). WEA , it is the intent of the City to provide an access road to the Safari r_ reservoir site located within the Ci limits in the Southeast -Srr��:,y.-.• City Quarter of the South- east Quarter of Section 31, 7bwnship 27 North, Range 23 West; and WHEREAS, Fee Owners are the owner of a� y 4,4 -acre parcel located within Goversat!ent `�.• Lot 2, Section 10, Township 115N in Apple Valley adjacent to the City's reservoir site; and .Fee Owners also requ re access to their property and wish to share such he Clay ..n�_.:L�.'�. nu'F.�:s-3w.'v�-...-.� ..i•-��a.'SdE ..- ,�31a:'tL_.��...Y.. T'�r'>^p'C.._C.P--a_. 4-^. ... - r... r� m ��r. �ri,�yv1a;{, nth+e CSty and Fee Owners agree as follows _ 3f sf��FJ•f�4ra.�&s:RtYlw'¢ei�i';L-�/�.�`ry'q-F.�: ev'./.��:•' c' .. r�-•_�'-:; ...M..•. ,�a1iait�..., .-..aL� r. ... ��. ' 1 "Ownership 'The ownership of the access mad and right -of -waxy will be retained - _ 2. Construction of Access Road. The City will be responsible for constructing the �as� - -access road to a 16' aggregate surfaced width and to a 6" depth. ;.gym =>,=• 3. Fee Owners shall be responsible for any future upgrading (widening, bituminous surfacing' etc which they may ��°'�•Y w.SN, ,.. _._•) require. Owners shall also be responsible for sai.ntaining the access mad. This -r shall include grading the surface, placing additional aggregate surfacing if required, and sxxw removal. ,� -•_ S. Terms of Breach. Breach of any teams of this agreement by Fee Owners shall be grounds for denial of further use of the access road until such breach is corrected either by the City or Fee Owners as the case may be. IN WITNESS WHERIDF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals. CITY OF EAGAN Mike Patten By: Its Mayor-.:,��. Shirley Patten \- ATTEST: J Its Clerk roved:• �� ' APP i�a.> � r r Y �� 701�" Eagan Public Works Director -73 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Twenty -Two REAPPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS D. Reapportionment of Special Assessments - Canterbury, Wedgwood '.arid -Oakwood Heights Addtions -- Under Project 345, Wilderness Run Road was improved from Capricorn Court to Dodd Road. Presently, there are pending assessments against the adjacent properties resul- ting from this project. James A. Curry of Lexington South Associ- ates, was the developer of the Canterbury and Wedgwood Additions and the fee owner of the property now platted as Oakwood Heights. He is now requesting that the pending assessments allocated against _.__,those three subdivisions be reallocated to his remaining unplatted within the Lexington South PUD. He has indicated that ,,.,.-.-,,parcelsthis is necessitated by a technical requirement of his Title 10 funding for development of this property which does not allow any -future assessments to be allocated against Canterbury Forest, Wedg- QOakwood Heights"=Additions. The total amount of assess- ood1?1'3nd%or, 4Kments ;,to .be 'respread totals' .$212,007.16 for: the street, storm ewerlateralnaand:storm sewer trunk. This reallocation of pending p.specialwii9sessments;4,4has .been approved through a special agreement by all -affected property owners and duly notarized. This is being h� brought to .the Council's attention because it formally allocates _dditidnaly 9's"sessments into property by special agreement without a formal hearing process. These agreements have been reviewed *,,,,.and .,.approved by the Public Works Department. The following is a list of tax parcels where these additional pending assessments will be allocated if approved by Council action: .--.. 1..:Parcel #10-02600-010-28 _ $ 7,536.80 2. Parcel #10-02600-010-29 29,393.52 3. Parcel #10-02600-015-30 315277.72 4. Parcel #10-02600-010-50 103,700.00 5. Parcel #10-02600-011-51 20,740.00 6. Parcel #10-02600-014-75 19,359.12 The staff has researched all parcels involved and has found that they are of sufficient size to adequately absorb these additional assessments. These amounts may be revised based on the final assess- ment figures for project 345 as these figures relate to the pending assessments at the present time. For the Council's information, enclosed on page -75 is a sample of the agreement executed by the affected property owners providing for this reallocation of special assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the agree- ment for reapportionment of special assessments for the parcels as listed previously. 4- • Ilan �l� •,,rte • • � E ., .. � . - u i-��7�1"iSs9�'�.fY'ri:Tilir.'1• /We hereby request of the City Council, City of Eaean, Minnesota, Reapportion- ment of pending special assessments for Project 0345 on nronerty owned by me/us - .. and legally described as follows: WEDGWOOD ADDITION All lots and Blocks REASSESSMENT to be spread over the following legal descriptions: parcel 10 02600 010 SO ' - - KIND OF IMPROVEMENT PEND!ttg AMOUNT i .v:.;:+•�.-: A. Sweet - 142,996.00 B'.Storm3ttlpr_ Latera] 21 745.60 . . C• Storm Sewer Trunk 138 958.40 -- D. I/WE hereby waive notice of any and all hearings necessary for the reapportion- [' went or reassessment of said assessments and further waive my/our right cc appeal y a reapporcionment . or reassessalent under: Minnesota Statutes 429.071.�i YS«.; ::2,F.. s .�1'i`i.>'.'NT. -, y':: Ss further-understoo'd-ehod-this requmc (hall -be relieved by the City Council the City of Eagan or its agent and I/WE will be given reasonable notice asto+ether - this request is approved or, modified tM, •�-'".}„ 3 x liLd; s�ii _ r.' :. ! firy. r -e+ •s `•, 2Cir' ,"!r'?.k�3•,A, =t ,4 'i >: '• The'undarsigned agrees'to pay all administrative costs incurred and billed by rti~9rav •--�• a ~'�"•-the City in such reassessments. the undersigned !e/are ail of the parsons who -r„"•'''-' have an interest in the property affected by the reassessment, including fee tit1d RWners, "contract `for deed holders or optlonees. +N +• - _ ,. The undersigned agrees that' this waiver shall run with the affected land and - -�r bind the heirs, successors and assigns of such land. :LA ��,•,» -• ---DATED: October 19, 1982 - rN � ` � Y. n Associntes William G. uttn lian Eut ne ons me- ., ,--- Yf //�E�.,.,•.e,Y:,(!j�urf�— t1on, Inc. REQUEST accepted b _ DATED: REQUEST referred to City Council for Action. DATED: November 9, 1982 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ' Approved Approved as Modified _ Denied w��....�— STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) / The or oing was acknowledged before me this /T 'day of l 1982, by James A. Currys President of Jim -Bar Investment Company, a Minnesota corporation, the Managing General Partner of Lexington South Associates, a Minnesota general partnership, on behalf of the part nersh'p. s. LEu ERT A Notary Public p wouaEwlvt- '!4p i CARVER CZJ:ITY •.�� WCy, nE.w.a, i_a A.MI 0 0 Agenda Information Memo November 9, 1982 Meeting Page Twenty -Three RIDGECLIFFE IST ADDITION TIME EXTENSION E. Ridgecliffe 1st Addition, Time Extension of Development Contract """° —On September '15, 1980, the City and Orrin Thompson Homes entered into a development contract for the Ridgecliffe 1st Addition. Part of this contract required that all street surfacing within this addition must be completed within two years (September 15, 1982). An inspection by the Public Works Department has revealed that the street surfacing has not been completed in accordance with this time frame. In response to a letter by the Public Works ,..,Director, _Orrin Thompson Homes replied that they would like to receive an extension of their required completion date until Septem- ber 1,' 1983 for completion of the streets within the Ridgecliffe 1st Addition. They have agreed to comply with the City's request -- ._--install a temporary blacktop surface on Lenore Lane from Cliff T:::; Road oto approximately X100 =feet -south to accommodate the ingress/ ;fiegress, .movement ionto _.Cliff ,Road from Lenore Lane. -They indicated hat"this work vwill a be .completed by November .15, but would .like KKT�tec'-`t o',receive,Ithe_extension for -the remainder until September 1, 1983. usehis involves an amendment to a formal contract between ;a developer and the City of Eagan, formal Council action is required. W-104 0 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny'the re- quest for ,time -extension _to September 1, 1983 for the completion of street surfacing within the Ridgecliffe 1st Addition. ''�SsiP~r'Y�F4 i..ipC_. `q'x:i+Cf . ..,i:; ._r.rt •. ... ,.. � s/Thomas RL Hedges ity miistrator -76 0 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 1982 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE Garden Rental Space Enclosed on page 7 $ is a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Monson expres- sing their appreciation for the City providing garden rental space for residents of Eagan. Status of Green Acres Properties Questions have been raised by the City Council as to who qualifies for green acre parcels in the City of Eagan. There were some con- „µ cerns-about-wcorporations-••qualifying for green -acre status. _•.There- ore,the„;City,:Administrator asked the Dakota County Assessor's W"NI!0! f�ice�for,gn;,explanation of the green acres qualification policy. nclosed on -..pages 7 qthrough -go is a letter that was recently eceived =from Robertt=ind, -Senior gricultural Appraiser for thee Dakota County Assessor's office. This letter does address the "policyefor�_;green_,acres,qualification. Protective Inspections Monthly Report/October Enclosed on page IgI is a copy if the Protective Inspections *�°amonthly report for t�month of October. sfF�jrFire Department Monthly Reports �r Enclosed on pages S 2 through VS are the Volunteer Fire Depart- -,ment monthly reportsts or the mont sof April through July. Joint Airport Zoning Board Minutes Enclosed on pages $ (. through q 3 are copies of minutes of the September 9 and 6cto`ier 7 Joint�irport Zoning Board meetings. s/Thomas 1. Hedges ity ministrator %% 0 0 DAKOTA COUNTY 'DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 HWY. 55 -HASTINGS. MINNESOTA 55033 PAUL R. Y� iiTjJ'+:'�N IYu October 29, 1982 a?^, Thomas L. Hedges a,�MY City Administrator uy rri,: ": £3795 Pilot Knob Road 55122 SEYMOUR 8 OLSON ASSESSOR TELEPHONE 512-437.0200 -kr ACRES PROPERTIESd 'YYrlL�ifISTEPF,1t?f2r:.N:4Fn... 3I_k: letter is `a follow up'to the meeting at which Mike Johnson .,,--and I reviewed Mike's of green acres parcels in the City of Eagan. � .�c..�a4 ..,..3{_� :�-c, - .._-ems .� =vffii.: • - .. �7^9�'YSS�1�"`�YrY` �re�•srlsraL�•i'na-''E, r't� «?,�,•3� qa�..�.'#=,r -, ,. :.. ;_ .• ...:.. ._ .. As you are aware, this office is in the process -of conducting a complete -revaluation,.of .all, real,estate-in the City of Eagan. There are no exceptions. This also includes those parcels enjoying the privileges of the green acres law. wS orn7.;f¢v '2'Q'}+z#5'`°i"S,-#e•i+41.%sSfqrs Presently, we+"'�yzs s. i Y.•hf i...uL:. have reviewed all green acres parcels in Eagan k.4 and have found six owners that we have asked to re -submit and verify :.. their qualifications. Some of these owners may be removed, (depending on qualifications) from their green acres status. In regards to those qualifications, it should be noted that corporations can qualify, provided they have owned the land for more than seven years. Homesteaded, or property that has been in the family, does not have to wait seven years. These can qualify for the current assessment, provided the application is submitted before May 1st of the assessment year. In order to qualify, you must own ten acres or more and show a gross income of $300 plus $10 per tillable acre. Rents for pasture use qualify as gross income even though it may be used for grazing horses. It's the GROSS RENT that qualifies, not whether it is rented for horses or cattle. It should also be noted that the main benefit of green acres in a city such as Eagan, is the deferment of special assessments which the assessor has no control of. The only control this office.has, is verification of the minimum requirements of the green acres law. 71 AN EQUAL OPPJRTUNITY EMPLOYER October 29, 1982 I1.. ION Thomas L. Hedges Re: (Veen Acres cw :}+ wr,Page 2 �`'�r�rwv`'J.*�.�"Fit.,¢:�£.wi.�'iivt7,k$�'X,d•.�y"a�,(',?:;jir'�5�1�.:r .._.rdt - i:�-..:..,.' .. .. .. .. . - �`ff��lNlR Fi ?�+>`,?:t''' .tAilJY36,Icuw.tif,.; ,.,.-y.? .•a.:., . ,� �,.•;.... .. ji Because of the nature of: unrecorded Contracts;.for Deeds, we :cannot positively know who is the owner of non=homesteaded properties.—,'' n .' Our only _proof of ownership is as -recorded in the County Recorder's_ ._.._. • - rvuca L n. a,iuu � rerai 4? nism°?3�S rrr — - r--< -,`'Senior Agriculture Appraiser c 'Mike Johnson r ti r �•._..r,--�.�--.:;.:,-� -.:. ...., - --.- - _---.- 1Y'S+tii�'s�-{'.'r'�.i�.i`.is•AW.Lir:o-�ri'r. r. �-.rL:_ .._ 'fes 'a. 'C...' r.. - .. .. • PROfFCPIVP L`TSPFCIZ0I_9 I D MILY RFPOP.T OCTOBER, 1982 L'k�cP=ON/0M- CF FaMS After -,,.-Type .... Units This Nbnth . Year -Tb -Date Puildir� x Plumbing 131.0 _ _ 1,192.0 I?VAC 97.5 997.5 . 73.0 °""`°Aikiiinistrative/Office •`"'`'°'°`.•'°",�"-...,,""'• 495.0 •" Fire Marshal 63.0 1,225.51 Miscellaneous 30.5 332.5 General Office 3.0 213.0' Permit Processi.ne 158.5 11461.5 :'[:• ,.CLtY Gamcil Meetings. 128.5 99.0 0.0 1.5 I�-MM OF PEMJITS ISScjjM $ 146,000.00 $ 589.50 wD.'Ihi c rbnth <z.liuiTding ^��,,r 'c„ ,Il Year -Tb -Date 62 545 Plumbing 0 0 atJec 0 --393 vv -�a.�_p��,r.-`j/�'�'vias.}•�d:�N,�n-.c.u�•....p,�ti��.r�r.',n_T.�.,� UM i.. s a{:, �^ L�[aLYiV'.3VC-`.auLLJlWlr C1K'1.L1J 'luJllT.�J-UM'&i�° 4: if:++1 ` "Y A, amu^ y.1 a Total Fees Include: Puildinr, Pe=.mt Fee, Sim --Charge, Plan Check Fee, SA(: Thit Fee, Rtter Connection Fee, 4h.tcr "'Teter Fee and Fuad Lhi_t Fee. Ell After -,,.-Type .... Units Valuation -- Pesmdt Fee Plan (heckF . x 27 Sin ie Fsmily 27 $1,707,000.00 $ 8,707.50 $4,353.75 $47,530.25 t hmleX .. •'- 6 $ .260,000.00 $ 1.518.00 $ 759.00 $ 9,877.00 16 1,blti-FnMily 16 ' $ 848,000.00 $ 4,648.00 $2,324.00 $27,316.00 2 Gm merical 2 $ 146,000.00 $ 589.50 $ 266.50 $ 4,799.00 0 Industrial 0 0 0 0 0 0 Institutional 0 0 0 0 0 3 Res. ('awe 3 $ 16,000.00 $ 157.50 $ 0 $ 165.60 0 Shin. Pool 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 Miscellaneous 8 5 69,600.00 $ 518.50 $ 141.50 $ 696.00 62 TOTAIS 62 $3,046,600.00 $16,139.001 $7,844.75 $90,383.75 Total Fees Include: Puildinr, Pe=.mt Fee, Sim --Charge, Plan Check Fee, SA(: Thit Fee, Rtter Connection Fee, 4h.tcr "'Teter Fee and Fuad Lhi_t Fee. Ell 0OLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHJREPORI FOR MONTH OF April 1982 401 &1)W,094'u1 W4Vw1*1 TYPE MAN HOURS Fire Calls 580 Rescue Calls 170 mw Wows = Training 401 _-, Truck 6 Equipment Maintenance 168 Station Maintenance 125 Fire Prevention 43 r.ax:r�Cut. Administrative 228 TOTAL 1715 47-, ,_j�,MANPOWER Available Days _...,_.,,:.. ..-,STATION Ul STATION #2 STATION #3 15 3 5 15 17 12 r�x 7 �d1 yq: r 18 ��uaii4d,-;tlrtak i•✓'.Fk�.cF4�r`i.j �'rs ::#fn's).. 4lr i ="TYPE NUMBER Structure 5 Grass 4 'Vehicle, )r ay1n.je;-7alseF " Other •. v;; y :, ; N. '.� . ,, . �,i.yin. L ,r t:;3,f: :s� r F. -c•:. 7 - - 2 TOTAL RESCUE CALLS TYPE Vehicle Accident Medical Industrial Miscellaneous TOTAL LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME 4/12/82 4/30/82 19 NUMBER 0 14 0 0 14 LOCATION 2159 Garnet Lane 1959 Easy Street 2Z $ LOSS $12,000. $12,000. nrrrro Amry House Apartment LOSS $10,000. $ 2,000. VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORI FOi WYM OF Wyy 1981 • WORK PERFORMED TYPE MAN HOURS Fire Calls 1080 Rescue Calls 208 ":...Training 566 truck -& -Equipment -Maintenance Station Maintenance <"'"` 128 .::; "3Yl+iLtF tb`1 �da.+=n:?r..... er,l; :_,.,:e•-h�t;�,. ... 'i ,. RESCUE CALLS TYPE Vehicle Accident Medical Industrial Miscellaneous TOTAL LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME 5/6/82 5/9/82 5/24/82 'oai•Nsi;�% NUMBER 0 15 0 1 16 0. �W(9. f.l�u'rI�]�. �:y14•+..� il_•ui: x� St,l!� $2,550. LOCATION OCCUPANCY LOSS 1645 City View Dr. Home $300.00 Pilot Knob 6 Yankee Barn $2000.00 3105 Pilot Knob Truck $250.00 W CERFORM, jE DrVAR"ENT M R. -Ft MONT. F OF June 1082 140 CERFORM, TVPE MN HOURS Fire Calls 580 Rescue Calls 140 -Training 253 pment'Mda-atenanc U -9 4M , e-- 168 Station Maintenance 1r5 Fire- Prevention 0 Administrative 242 1508 r- 2 STATION -2 ,ESC',';. S NKR :-1-2 Ac --idert L Au-.; 11 a]. cl 1. 'qE'7 A $2. '3. w - N EER :='_RE DEPA_t==\_ MONTH -1 "frPOR'_ vol� OF July WORK ='RFORMED TYPE YAN HOURS Fire Calls 820 ' ..-Rescue Calls 173 nrp `_TrA-fni . e _mak :"-. .. 237 Truck _S Equipment Maintenance ' ' 159 ,`Station Maintenance 120 3 Fire Prevention 20 lAdministr_ative 88 d . izcTOTALs'e2�e�✓aer^;�, .+__ .... . ' 16f7 'trs +r,+L,+ 1STATION #1�,-.. STATION #3 x - — 10 $18,200.00 - . ,-..• a ra.,R�OTAI.."R !sersr.' ..tee;,. ..;7earo:ry r•.rn:..a.. -4- - :,.�-. $16,200,00 RESCUE CALLS _%7UN3ER Acc ent 17 q JAT'i SAYE -OCA -IOL CCCUFA_NCY LOSS 3575 Lexiii,7.:o+ erage 515,000 Rahn 32. :`:L.ct:-_ 5 2,000 Site ,00{,• 11s Wold -Chamberlain Field Joint Airport Zoning Board Meeting 4 p.m., Thursday, October 7, 1982 Metropolitan Airports Commission Conference Room Board Members in Attendance: John Voss, (Chairman), Larry Lee, Mark Mahon, Thomas Egan, Jim Losleben, Larry Shaughnessy, Jr., Vern Luettinger, Rick Wiederhorn, Nancy Witta. Others in Attendance: Nigel Finney, Tom Anderson, Bill Olson, Tim Anderson, Dan Callahan, John Shardlow, George Burkards, Eileen McMahon, David Hozza. kk , — + � +oY av s ,. ,,Minutes to Order man Voss, called _themeefing to order, at 4:05 p.m Approval of Minutes he minutes of the September 9,-1982 meeting were approved. Tg ar SeQor�t,,q iat P1nQOT received -comments :on the :Airport =Zoning Z .a�ttIonns,;>,from�tjie;;City,of,St -Paul, SMAC, and.,the Downtown St =-Paul �a'XJr4°fid �*a rt joint •Zoning Board.—According-to Dick Keinz, the comments 'received 't"`�'•'` more'complaints rather than recommendations_ on how to-change.the ti ins- nDOT 'taff-ciembers,ere _reviewing all, of.,the comments and will rr oRd ovember l5 recommending any changes that should be dered....,Ms. McMahon explained that the only change that Mr. Keinz oned wa the possibility of setting a maximum length for the A and B y . 'However, he recommended that the Board proceed with the zoning P it - weporc on the status'or the Downtown Airport -Zoning Process Ms. McMahon reported -that the Downtown St. Paul Joint Zoning.Board submitted a preliminary draft ordinance to MnDOT last February. MnOOT's response, which was received in August, indicated It was willing to go along with some r= -'-modifications to the Horizontal Zone definition but it still is not willing to go along with the suggestion to eliminate Zone B for Runway 14. MnDOT stipulated that the full length for the A and B Zones be preserved. Ms. McMahon added that the Downtown Airport Joint Zoning Board did extensive research to propose safe alternatives to the regulations and employed some very creative solutions. She suggested that at a future meeting Mr. Wiederhorn give a presentation on the Downtown St. Paul Airport proposed ordinance. At this time the Downtown Joint Zoning Board Is waiting to see If MnDOT will make any changes to the regulations. V. Presentation on Operations of ',Vold -Chamberlain Field Tim Anderson, NAC manager responsible for Noise Abatement, explained the agreements and procedures currently in effect that are designed to reduce the volume and frequency of noise from aircraft operating out of Wold -Chamberlain Field. Major carriers have voluntarily agreed to limit flight operations between I1 - p.m. and o a.m. Practice flights are limited and the najor airlines use airports other than Wold -Chamberlain for practice purposes. ',lhenever possible, arrival and departure operations follow transportation corridors and pass over less populated areas. S(7 Mr. Anderson explained Air Traffic Control procedures for landing and taking -off from Wold -Chamberlain field. He added that an extremely positive relationship exists with the local FAA officials and they are cooperative in ( using the preferential runway system to reduce noise impacts whenever possible. The FAA Is working to streamline its operations procedures and plans to allow for departing aircraft from Runway 22 to turn sooner towards the river corridor areas. The Safety Zones defined in the zoning ordinance do not change with the modification of departure paths.- vim. � ,a4:nr.. A discussing trends"in the-'airline'industry, Mr. Anderson explained that * �•!-" -more1.-1.. ubleIengine turbo props are being used because of increased commuter =,K operations and major air carriers will be using aircraft that is less_ no.isey. 'Wide bodies, which increase passenger capacity, are being used more and ultimately will have the effect of preventing a significant increase. in "OR the number of operations, at Wold -Chamberlain Field. �K^0He,,,added that.,airport safety has improved because more efficient aircraft _ Wold -Chamberlain Field Joint Airport Zoning Board Meeting 4 p.m., Thursday, September 9, 1982 Metropolitan Airports Commission Offices Board Members In Attendance: John Voss, (Chairman), Dale Runkle, Thomas Egan, James Losleben, Lawrence Shaughnessy, Jr., Rick Jopke, Rick Wiederhorn, Wilfred Larry Jung. Others in Attendance: David Hozza, Tim Anderson, Bill Olson, Tom Anderson, Dan '.'. Callahan, George Burkards, John Shardlow, David Phelps, Bernard Friel, Larry Lee, ''.�.65:*£•r+5 Richard Kelnz, David Nybakken, James Fortman. 'na°#T;Y'J,er.-.w"Y'£,i +,�+�,J!.!,..;L•x"' A+1'JyiSY`AZ.'F..4""K'n,'!>k +a.. >;.ti';:.{ .ark. Minutes Call to Order ....Chairman Voss called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. a.II Approval of Minutes M r •,-`r r of ` a + i.er r ..k. s t1 ..-`.> It"•was"moved and seconded to approve the minutes as mailed Motion passed ��'`Tlat L S 1 -yy H yt r.+. -tet L n . i..r•r� r "'�.,„"�''_r .rn ;rs rr,.r-s.l Opening Remarks & Introduct ion _ ... . 4 uRifty, Mr. Keinz,.Assistant Commissioner of Aeronautics for MnDoT, introduced Mr. Nybakkeri;''Regional Airport Engineer for MnDoT, and Mr. Fortman, Director of Airport Development for MnDoT. Mj�.'Keinz explained that in 1973 the state �roa�rwmandated that, in order to be eligible for state aid for airport development purposes, municipalities zone for airport safety. Of the 141 municipal or �publicly-owned airports in the state over 100 are zoned and 30 more are in rl:,.the.process of .being zoned. .-......:r; :., -��„�%�'i 23'. .x�s �a- +�..:..: �:.�P�'i �'r _. S .::S�rJ .'3 �".:r.. y�-y _ ...,. .: .� .., .. .,5• , ' "' '� ' ,.- `IV Explanation of Air_Space Zones and Land Use Zones Mr. Nybakken explained that airport zoning is divided into two -parts - - _._ airspace zoning and land use zoning. Using overhead transparencies, he explained the geometries of airspace zoning, as it applies to Wold - Chamberlain Field. Starting with the 1,000' wide, rectangular, primary surface, he explained that the approach surface begins at the end of the primary surface. It extends upward into the airspace at a slope of 50:1 (50 feet horizontally and 1 foot vertically) and extends outward from the 1,000 foot primary zone at. a ratio of 20 feet horizontal and 3 feet perpindicular. At 1,000 feet out, the approach surface is 4,000 feet wide. The horizontal zone is an imaginary surface existing 150' above the airport elevation. The transitional zone is a trough -Like surface that begins where the primary and approach surfaces meet and it extends outward and upward until it intersects the horizontal surface. The conical surface extends outward and upward from the perimeter of the horizontal zone at a 20:1 ratio for a distance of 4,000 feet. Mr. Nybdkken explained that the restriction that applies to these surfaces is that nothing may penetrate them. There are three land use zones - Zone A, Zone B, and Zone C. Zones A and B are shadows of the approach surface with Zone A starting at the point where the primary and approach surface meet. Zone A extends outward on the ground for a distance equivalent to 2/3 the length of the runway. Zone B continues for a distance equivalent to 1/3 the length of the runway. Zone C is the ground level shadow of the horizontal surface. V. Explanation of the Rationale behind the Design of the Zone To explain the rationale behind the land use restriction for the A and B ". .,Zones, Mr."Nybakken used a handout (see attached.) Exceptions to the land use restrictions do exist. The zoning is not retroactive and therefore existing non -conforming uses and established —residential neighborhoods in built-up urban areas are allowed to continue to exist and are grandfathered into the ordinance. Non -conforming uses are not allowed to become more of a non -conforming use than they were on the day of adoption of the ordinance. The other exception is the limitation that nN y,.�:.,"the zoning authority extends only 2 miles from the airport property. The Zoning Administrator is responsible for enforcing the ordinance and must abide by a strict interpretation of the ordinance In the process of Issuing �yz permits:�i;The,.Board 'of -Adjustment is responsible for allowing variances .To ,�,;kappeal; higher. --than the Board of Adjustment, -an aggreived..party must go ''- --- - -- _ # ,,.Mr., Egan said that Runways 11R -29L and 11L -29R are parallel and accommodate 6 § q asicallyathe-same••traffic.5,•':Because one -is shorter -than the other, the resulting B -Zones have significantly different impacts on development in y Mendota Heights and Eagan. --He asked why one municipality should experience more restrictions than the other when they service the same aircraft. Mr. x Keinz explained that the zoning formula is designed to provide for uses in "" w the future as well as for today. At some point in the future the longer ^�5 ,runway may be needed Por yet -to -be developed aircraft. `Mr. Losleben said the aircraft oftentimes do not fly in the .footprint -of the defined zones and he asked how that can be controlled. Mr. Keinz said that in the approach at 10,000 feet out aircraft are usually following the extended centerline. On takeoff, they sometimes turn sooner than 10,000 feet. Problems most often occur near the threshold and the area near that threshold is most crucial. By the time they are out to the B -Zone area, the plane has enough altitude and speed for the pilot to select a spot for putting it down. National Transportation Advisory Board statistics show that the highest percentage of mishaps occur within one mile of the airport and the percentages decline significantly at two and three miles out. For the purpose of enforcing the ordinance the Zoning Administrator may be one person assigned to enforce it for a multi -jurisdictional area or it may be the Zoninq Administrator for each affected municipality. Mr. Hozza asked which is preferable. MnDOT has not taken a position on the issue. 0 0 Mr. Wiederhorn asked if the existance of Established Residential Neighborhoods within the Safety Zones make a runway or an airport unsafe. Mr Keinz said such development would not necessarily make it unsafe, but the C purpose of zoning is preventative not. corrective. VII. Closing Comments Mr. Keinz noted that the task of zoning for the Wold -Chamberlain Field will not be an easy task. He cautioned the board to give careful consideration _So the task. On the issue of whether or not MnDoT plans to make any changes to its zoning rules based on the public testimony it is now taking, Mr. Keinz said he was willing to listen to new ideas. He does not foresee any major changes, however. III. Next Meeting Date/Adjourn - --MAC operations staff will be invited to attend the next meeting to discuss : any conflict they see between the proposed zoning areas and actual operations and to explain how they would comply with the ordinance. x The next_ meeting will Abe held at-4,p.m., Thursday, October 7 at MAC. ,YY^ttp v:ub.fii •Y: y. ..a. f- .. .. .., .. 40 OINNESOr4 ro yo 0 'OF TRW Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Phone LAND USE SAFETY ZONING '.<.,.A -..PURPOSE: To encourage those land uses that are safely compatible with the airport. 1. Airports and that area within one mile of an airport represents 1/2 •�, '! •.+:of one percent of the land mass in Minnesota, and about 70% of re- i+;;�-,�e, �odta,,,g.�lfvittFe7 n%'Vacorded aircraft •accidents are occurring within -that •small percen tes+ar+3a..�;;traz1 �:ti,��. °of area. ,.. .- � t2Se 2. Accidents on or within one mile of an airport occur during takeoff * ' �r landing operations when aircraft are operating at altitudes pg ��^and near critical stall speeds. vYutui= az cv_wnere ro make a Iorcea iana=g become extremely ' -•.limited when operating at low altitudes and sio:•:er speeds. *10 010" "k4 n_the intere t� of spa ety, open spaces to accommodate forced lendings �> should be encouraged in areas where aircraft are kno,,m to be operating "4s xr+^• at these critical speeds and altitudes, i.e. approach areas to airport runways. tv,+SB CONCEPT OF LAND USE SAFETY ZONE SIZE Width Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 77. 2. Flared Sides — Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 77. 3. Length — Proportioned to runway length. a. Longer runways attract more activity. b. Longer runways attract larger more sophisticated aircraft. c. The larger the aircraft and the more the activity, the greater the frequency of longer and flatter approaches and departures. C. CONCEPT OF SEOMENTS 1. On an approach or departure, the closer the operation is to the runway, the more critical the situation because of diminished altitude and speed. 2. Logic then follows that land use safety restrictions can transition fro,m very restrictive (Zone A) to no restrictions. 3. Reality dictates that due to the complexities of zoning the number of transitions be limited to one. (Zone B) 91 An Equal Opportunity Employer C D. CONCEEPT OF USE RESTRICTIONS 1. Zone A. Critical area. A troubled aircraft in need of'this area will norm ally have no maneuvering potential. From a'safety stand- point, no development should be permitted. ,,... 2. -6-B. " Transitional area. A troubled aircraft in need of this area will normally be operating with enough speed and altitude to provide sore minor maneuvering potential in the straight ahead direction. From a safety standpoint, development should be controlled so as to provide reasonable open space in which to maneuver a a:,.•. •;z.... .. .,-forced landing. E. MISCEUMEOUS CONSIDERATIONS 1. ?thy should runway length determine land use safety zone length? a The Mdrnesota zoning statute provides the authority to zone in 7=-V2% a1°�: the approach areas -to runways out to a distance of two miles. rG1^,, b� ; The longest runways in Minnesota are about two miles in length._ * Tying runway length to land use safety zone length is consistent WWP with=la,r4,The longest runways maximize the use of the .'zoning authority, ' and shorter runways may use proportionately less of the �s•�'"fv{zonu►g authority e It's simple, reasonable; and equitable. OWL 2. :•]hy split Zone A and Zone B on a 2/3 - 1/3 ratio of runway length? a. Most smaller Minnesota airports, particularly the smaller paved airports, have acquired clear zone protection out to a distance of 2000 feet from the primary surface. b. Typically, the smallest airports having clear zone protection are airports with about a 3000 foot paved primary runway.* c. This crell established airport situation tends to create a basis for determining an acceptable level of safety in the more simple case; 3000 foot runway with 2000 foot clear zone. That's a 2/3 ratio. d. The area ratio.of Zone A to Zone B more closely approximates a simple 50/50 split. 92 �I d w z 0 tl a��y}.ifiv: .! 1 � v� xrft� 41�✓•f-r.�{F}N -' 'r �-fl 3t ;e r+.$N� �pI}•-Y S 6+ih'amy��'��lrTY�fA`Ty`Ir�v'vAy\�q','o�_ .�y"y �. G4Tt�Y��'V+''r -~ T+F�S. 1f `J�M•�'s,.a]Y.�er1�YF35.10.Z! LZr.9eiJ�v'v ` 1 d - .. �Fr•n!' ._...,,Ae':rfi.A.+ir�r.. snrn......... . ...... _ _ w Wit.. n�11rY ��' Wil}M n9 }� 1'41r1}:i ?£'t .•h y(''� ... r -J•sFlu �.Y��.i. "ya 14 T� 1 vIM t, I J rrA'::f ....:W.Si.l.. yM"� � .. '.^�.Nr ".7 �' '.� a. '..,'e" �I d w z 0 tl a��y}.ifiv: .! 1 � v� xrft� 41�✓•f-r.�{F}N -' 'r �-fl 3t ;e r+.$N� �pI}•-Y S 6+ih'amy��'��lrTY�fA`Ty`Ir�v'vAy\�q','o�_ .�y"y �. G4Tt�Y��'V+''r -~ T+F�S. 1f `J�M•�'s,.a]Y.�er1�YF35.10.Z! LZr.9eiJ�v'v d - s