Loading...
08/23/1983 - City Council Regular0 MINUTES OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA AUGUST 23, 1983 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, August 23, 1983 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. Those present were Chairman Hall, Members Turnham, Krob, McCrea and Wold. Absent were Bohne, Wilkins and Mulrooney. Also present were City Planner Runkle, Assistant City -Engineer Hefti and City Attorney Hauge. AGENDA Upon motion by McCrea, seconded Turnham, it was resolved that the Agenda be approved with the understanding that Agendaitem IIIA. consisting of the John Charles Gruidl application for conditional use permit will be continued indefinitely and that item G. consisting of the Will Stenzel Construction Co. application for preliminary plat approval of Pheasant Knoll be continued until the next regular meeting. All voted yes. � Uh4 July 26, 1983 - Regular meeting. Upon motion by Turnham, seconded McCrea, it was resolved that the Minutes be approved. All voted yea. LAUKKA-BECK - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The continued public hearing concerning the application of Laukka-Beck for rezoning from RSC -PD (Regional Shopping Center Planned Development District) and R-4 (Residential Multiple) to PD (Planned Development) and for preliminary plat approval of Laukka-Beck Eagan, containing 458.1 acres in the area of I-494 and Highway #55 was convened by Chairman Charles Hall. The City Planner, Dale Runkle, presented a resume' of information gathered since the last regular meeting of July 26, 1983 and stated that the City Council directed the Planning Commission to direct its efforts toward the planning functions of the application, including the preliminary plat and zoning. He indicated the workload of the staff does not allow it to do a complete socio- economic study which would be required at a later time if the application progresses. A report from Mr. Runkle dated August 16, 1983 was reviewed with the understanding that the Planning Department has analyzed several aspects of the project. Firstly, the office retail/office showroom area consisting of 200 acres would consist of about 2,035,000 square feet and total parking spaces required of 7,461. Traffic generated would be approximatley 23,317 trips. The pro- posal is to construct the project within a period of 7 to 10 years, the evaluation would be $180,000,000.00 to $235,000,000.00 and possibly generate taxes in the neighborhood of about $8.2 million to $11.5 million, based on the 1982 tax rate. APC Minutes August 23, 1983 Secondly, the report dealt with the effects of a Class A track facility in regard to land use and evaluation on the remaining 240 acre site. Com- parisons between the proposed track facility and other uses including the residential uses in relation to tax revenues and valuations were discussed, these included the trips generated, park dedication issues, etc., noting the race track facility would be a less intense use than other current RSC zoned use for shopping center. There was also discussion concerning the potential for amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan and reviewal by the Metropolitan Council. It was noted it would be about 20 years in construction if the racetrack is not included. Mr. Runkle stated that he received a detailed memorandum from the applicants the day before the hearing concerning land use and economic issues. Peter Jarvis of B.R.W., Inc. appeared on behalf of the applicant, as did several other persons. Mr. Jarvis briefly discussed fire protection, security, water supply, transportation in the area and access. Chairman Hall opened the hearing for public questions and comments and they included questions concerning filling the two ponds on, the property and the potential water contamination. Mr. Hefti stated the waste would be re- moved daily and an EIS is expected to be prepared for the site. Dave Rolbecki, an owner in the general area, asked questions about tax increment and industrial revenue financing and objected that tax increment financing -would not generate as much tax revenue.as for the City. Francis O'Neill asked if the use was in conformance with the proposed land use for the area and Mr. Runkle stated that would be a decision for the Planning Commission and Council. There was a question concerning the amount of.office space and the timing, including whether the developers may be too optimistic with a surplus of office space in the area. It was noted, however, that the City is not directly involved in the economics of the office complex. The design of the buildings was a concern of another person present and it was noted the planned development process includes several stages, including detailed design stages. Also, the planned development zoning allows for changes during the process as opposed to fixed zoning for a specific use. One area resident objected to the race track use. It is expected that the cost of the racetrack facility would be about $25 to $30 million dollars, generating about $1.1 million dollars real estate tax per year. The public portion of the hearing was closed at 7:50 p.m. Member Turnham then reviewed the Minutes of the last Planning Commission meeting concerning the application and there was discussion concerning the timing for the Planned Development Agreement, and reversion in the event that construction did not take place according to the provision of the agreement. Traffic was an important issue to Planning Commission members, and comparisons were made with the Burnsville Center of 20,000 to 22,000 trips per day on Highway 042. Dodd Road will be improved beginning in the fall of 1983, according to information received. 2 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 Member Wold was concerned about saturation of office retail zoning in Eagan and it was noted that some competition will be created if developed. It was also stated that I-494 will not be completed if the track is opened in 1985 with the main access being from 1155 initially, but later from I-494 and Highway 11149. Member McCrea asked if the Metro Council would review the proposal and it was understood that it would be involved in the EIS process, but it was expected that no amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be necessary. It was also noted that a meeting will be held with Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights officials concerning the proposal. Member Krob asked if the commercial area was only a smoke screen and if the race track is not approved for that location by the Minnesota Racing Facility Commission, what alternate will the developers place on the property. Mr. Jarvis stated that the intention would be to move ahead with mixed use, if the track is not approved, and the emphasis would be on non-residential uses, particularly office showroom. Also, there were questions whether there would be changes in the use of office buildings in the next 20 years, but Mr. Jarvis stated it would be hard to predict such changes. Member Krob again expressed his concern about the socio-economic issues. A letter from the South St. Paul -Inver Grove Heights Chamber of Commerce favoring the project was read by Chairman Hall. Chairman Hall asked whether all enclosed spaces are sprinkled and the answer was in the affirmative. He recommended the planned development extend for no more than 10 years with the racetrack planned development por- tion a maximum of 3 years from the time of commencement of construction. He stated the site was not logical for shopping center, only because normal shopping mall centers are from 100 to 125 acres, and therefore felt that the planned development could be amended to allow for proposed uses. Mr. Hall also recommended Agricultural underlying zoning for the race track area by agreement. After nearly two hours of discussion, McCrea moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application of rezoning from RSC -PD and R-4 to PD (Planned Development), subject to the following conditions: 1. The Planned Development Agreement for the race track facility cover a maximum period of 3 years from the date of final council approval to the date of commencement of construction. 2. In the event that the Planned Development Agreement is in default, that the zoning will revert to Agricultural underlying zoning for the race facility 233.8 acres. 3. The balance of the property shall be intended for office re- tail/office showroom area to provide for a maximum 10 year development with underlying CSC zoning. 4. The Class A Race Track shall be determined to be an accepted use under the Planned Development. Q 0 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 40 5. The Planned Development Agreement shall be executed by the applicant no later than 4 months from the date of Council approval of the planned development. 6. The park dedication requirements as imposed by the City will be fulfilled by the applicant. 7. A socio-economic impact study will be prepared and included in the planned development process. 8. The Planned Development Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to final execution. The Planning Commission members also recommended that the members' concerns at the July Planning Commission meeting be incorporated into the Planned Development process, noting that the City's economic development image and land values are effected by the outcome of the planned development. All voted in favor. Krob then moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application for preliminary plat, subject to all conditions imposed by the staff and approved by the City Council, to be attached to the Development Agreement. All voted in favor. MARJORIE J. BRANDT - WAIVER OF PLAT The public hearing concerning the application of Marjorie J. Brandt for waiver of plat for Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Country Home Heights Addition was next convened by the Chairman. Ms. Brandt was present and indicated that she requested the waiver for both physical and economic reasons and felt that the change in lot line would not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood. The objective is to eventually sell her home and that the garage located on the two lots be included with the lot on which the house is located. There were no objections to the application. The end result would include 27,900 square feet for Lot 4, and 45,000 square feet for Lot 5. Krob moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. All necessary easements shall be dedicated to the City as recom- mended by City staff. 2. All applicable ordinances shall be complied with. All voted yes. 4 0 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 11 KINDER KOLLECE, INC. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DAY CARE CENTER .The next public hearing concerned the application of Kinder Kollege, Inc. for conditional use permit for the establishment of a day care center in the former Mr. Steak restaurant in the Cedarvale Shopping Center area. Mr. Runkle reviewed the application and there were no objections. A representative of the applicant was present and stated that nearly all children will be full time with the base play area being asphalt, covered with a pea sized gravel. He stated that possibly a latch key operation will be provided for children above age 5. Krob emphasized the need for a location for children above the age of 5, after school. The Planning Commission discussed whether the pro- posal would be a use deemed similar for conditional use permit under CSC zoning. The facility would be licensed by the State Department of Public Welfare. After discussion, Wold moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application with the understanding, however, that such an establishment would not in all cases, be allowed in CSC zoning, but it appears to be appropriate because of the favorable traffic patterns, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation shall be from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 2. This use shall meet all State licensing requirements. 3. This proposed newly -created lot shall be subject to the Park Commis- sion's review and comment. 4. All applicable City Ordinances shall be met. All voted yea. NATIONAL CHILD CARE CENTERS, INC. - DAY CARE CENTER The next hearing concerned the application of National Child Care Centers, Inc. for conditional use permit for day care center on Lot 3, Block 1, Hilltop Plaza. Mr. Runkle presented the application to the Planning Com- mission and stated that the neighborhood business district provision does not provide for day care facility as a permitted, conditional or accessory use. However, the provision allowing for uses deemed similar by the Council could be allowed as a conditional use. The 8,316 square foot building would accom- modate 165 to 175 children, up to the age of 5, but it was understood that the latch key operation may also be implemented. Representatives of National Child Care Center, a nine -state area child care company, were present and stated the operation is full-service with company-owned vans to pick up and deliver children. There was considerable discussion concerning the establish- ment of a lot line to provide for a building not in excess of 20% square foot 9 0 0 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 coverage of the lot, and it was understood that the developer of the subdivi- sion will subdivide as required by the City. There were also questions con- cerning architectural matching and the representatives indicated the face brick will match the shopping center building. There being no objections, Krob moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the applica- tion, subject to the following conditions: 1. The lot line shall be established so the building would cover no more than 20% of the lot through approval of waiver of plat on subdivision approval. 2. The hours of operation shall be from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 3. The applicant shall meet all State licensing requirements. 4. This proposed newly -created lot shall be subject to the Park Commis- sion's review and recommendation. 5. All applicable ordinances shall be complied with. 6. Easements shall be dedicated as required by the City. All voted in favor. A.J. ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing concerning the application of Tri -Land Co., Inc., Bradley Swenson, for preliminary plat for A. J. Addition, consisting of approximately one acre containing 3 single family lots on County Road 1126 and Egan Avenue was next opened by the Chairman. Mr. Runkle presented the appli- cation on behalf of the staff and stated that he understood that Lots 2 and 3 have consent from the Dakota County Highway Department for access to Lone Oak Road. Staff would recommend a single common access to Lone Oak Road. Brad Swenson appeared for the applicant and a number of objecting neighboring owners also appeared. One owner across the street indicated that he under- stood that he could not get access to Lone Oak Road and therefore did not do so when he built his home. Chuck Maloney of Country Home Heights. Addition stated that it was his opinion that 48 feet by 330 feet of the Country Home Heights Addition was excluded from the application. It was noted, however, that a portion of Lot 8 was included in the applicant's land area. There were also objections that the protective covenants would not allow for a split of lot and Mr. Swenson stated that it was his understanding that the covenants have now expired. Drainage issues, possible lack of parking, the fact that the other lots in Country Home Heights Addition are large lots and the neigh- bor directly to the north indicated he was assured that there would only be [: 0 9 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 one house on the lot, were some objections that were raised. There was also an objection to the staff's recommendation that credit for the extra cost of boring under Lone Oak Road for utility access be given, but it was noted this was recommended because of the distance required for access purposes. Also, there will be a median on Lone Oak Road, which would permit only right turn in and out. Mr. Swenson stated that in 1969 the owner of the land gave one-half acre to the County in exchange for access and a culvert to Lone Oak Road and it was also noted that Lot 8 had been split at an earlier time, and thus the reason for including it in the proposed A. J. Addition. After considerable discus- sion, Hall moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend denial of the applica- tion for reasons that were expressed by the neighbors, including the following: 1. That the covenants appear to prohibit the split of a lot for con- struction of more than one building for each platted lot in Country Home Heights Addition. 2. There is uncertainty as to whether the access to Lone Oak Road is permitted, but in any event, extreme safety problems would clearly be created by direct access to Lone Oak Road. 3. There is inadequate parking with potential parking on Lone Oak Road and also on Egan Avenue. 4. Further, all reasons cited in the discussion portion above. All voted in favor. GONYEA COMPANY - BEAD D' RDE DRIVE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The hearing regarding the application of Gonyea Company and Dennis D. Gonyea for preliminary plat approval for proposed Beau D' Rue Drive Addition was brought before the Planning Commission. Mr. Runkle discussed the applica- tion and stated that no other specific uses are planned other than two existing buildings, but noted that two larger buildings are proposed on the property. Mike Gair, Planner, appeared for the applicant and explained the proposal in detail. He stated that he generally agreed with staff's recommen- dations, but that the applicant, would prefer to avoid the requirement for common parking. The actual uses of the property are uncertain and the size of the buildings has not been determined. A number of neighboring property owners were present and stated that the soil is very unstable and therefore additional grading and retaining walls may not be desirable in the area. Mr. Krob had concerns about storm drainage and proposed that a storm sewer project be installed to provide for the drainage. Specific parking plans will be provided in the future as the development takes place. A number of neighbor- ing property owners were present and expressed concerns about the proposal and also objected to the current condition of the buildings on the parcel. Wold moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following conditions: 7 0 0 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 1. A detailed_ grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff at the time of building permit applica- tion. 2. The applicant shall connect some of the back parking areas together in order to allow better traffic circulation in the rear of the buildings. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff, and a landscape bond shall be submitted for an amount approved by the staff and not released until one year after the landscaping has been com- pleted. 4. The parking area shall be surfaced and concrete curbing shall.be provided around the perimeter of the parking area. 5. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's comments and recommendations and park dedication requirements shall be met. 6. The plan shall be subject to all other City Code requirements. 7. If installed privately, plans and specifications for utility services shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted to the "w Engineering Department for approval. 8. Internal driveways shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 9. A 40 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Beau D' Rue Drive. 10. Easements shall be dedicated according to recommendations of the staff. 11. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessment at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 12. All other improvements shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 13. A storm sewer outlet shall be installed to the staff's specifica- tions, in the southeast area of the plat to accommodate drainage. All voted in favor. 8 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 0 0 U. S. HOMES CORPORATION - RIDGECLIFFE ADDITIONS REZONING - WAIVER OF PLAT - PRELIMINARY PLATS The hearings regarding the applications of U. S. Homes - Orrin Thompson Homes for rezoning, waiver of plat and approval of two preliminary plats for Ridgecliffe 6th and 7th Additions was convened by the Chairman. Mr. Runkle introduced the applications: A. Ridgecliffe 6th Addition - Preliminary Plat. An application for preliminary plat approval of Ridgecliffe 6th Addition consisting of 3.3 acres and containing 8 single family lots, located on Outlot D, Ridgecliffe 1st Addition, and parts of Outlots A and B, Park Ridge Addition, was presented. It was noted that this was simply an extension of the Park Ridge Addition plat and there were no objections to the application. It was noted that Lot 5 is under 12,000 square feet. Hall moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot 5 shall include a minimum of 12,000 square feet area. 2. Detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be sub- mitted and approved by City staff. 3. All City ordinances shall be adhered to. 4. A Development Agreement shall be entered into and executed by the City and the Developer. 5. All easements shall be dedicated to the City as requested by City staff. 6. The water main shall be looped in accordance with engineering requirements. 7. No variances shall be allowed except for topographic or vegetation reasons. All voted yea. B. Ridgecliffe 7th Addition - Preliminary Plat. The next application proposed would be a revision to small single family lots, providing for Lots 1 through 12, Block 1, Ridgecliffe 4th Addition to be platted into Ridgecliffe 7th Addition. The application also was for R-1 Planned Development to allow deviation and a reduction in the overall density. Bill Fierke was present on behalf of the applicant, as was Chuck Winden, Surveyor. Each house would have 0 0 0 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 an entire use of one side yard, and there would also be small front and back yards. The largest home would sell for about $100,000.00 and the zero lot line concept would be implemented. Some private easements would be set up and the City could also acquire easements along the lot lines. The President of Ridgecliffe Association and other residents in the area were present and objected to certain aspects of the application. The President stated that he had not gotten advanced notification, that there were covenants that the Association members were concerned about, and objected to ten houses, where only six lots were now provided. Architectural control was an important issue for the Association. Krob moved, Wold seconded the motion to continue the application concerning the 7th Addition until the next meeting to allow con- sultation between the developer and the Townhouse Association Board. All voted yes. C. Rezoning from R-2 to R-1 PD and Waiver of Plat for Lots 22 and 23, Block 9t and Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 10, Ridgecliffe lst Addition. The proposed rezoning was from R-2 to R-1 PD for two duplex lots to contain five single family parcels. There were no objections to the application. Wold was concerned about the size of the lots and the architectural controls which he felt were more important with smaller lots. It was noted there was a swamp on the east side, north of Karis Way, and a berm was intended to be installed along Calaxie Avenue. Krob moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application for rezoning and waiver of plat to shift lots lines, subject to the following conditions: 1. The lot line for Lot 15, Block 10 will be moed to provide for a minimum 60 foot front yard width. 2. The exhibits showing the three proposed house pads be included in the Development Agreement and there be assurance of architectural conformity. 3. A Planned Development Agreement shall be prepared and signed covering all necessary City conditions as recommended by staff. All voted affirmatively. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by McCrea, seconded Krob, it was resolved that the meeting adjourn at 11:55 p.m. All voted yea. PHH Secretary iH MINUTES OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA AUGUST 23, 1983 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, August 23, 1983 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. Those present were Chairman Hall, Members Turnham, Krob, McCrea and Wold. Absent were Bonne, Wilkins and Mulrooney. Also present were City Planner Runkle, Assistant City Engineer Hefti and City Attorney Hauge. AGENDA Upon motion by McCrea, seconded Turnham, it was resolved that the Agenda be approved with the understanding that Agendaitem III.A. consisting of the John Charles Gruidl application for conditional use permit will be continued indefinitely and that item G. consisting of the Will Stenzel Construction Co. application for preliminary plat approval of Pheasant Knoll be continued until the next regular meeting. All voted yes. July 26, 1983 - Regular meeting. Upon motion by Turnham, seconded McCrea, it was resolved that the Minutes be approved. All voted yea. LAUKKA-BECK - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The continued public hearing concerning the application of Laukka-Beck for rezoning from RSC -PD (Regional Shopping Center Planned Development District) and R-4 (Residential Multiple) to PD (Planned Development) and for preliminary plat approval of Laukka-Beck Eagan, containing 458.1 acres in the area of I-494 and Highway 455 was convened by Chairman Charles Hall. The City Planner, Dale Runkle, presented a resume' of information gathered since the last regular meeting of July 26, 1983 and stated that the City Council directed the Planning Commission to direct its efforts toward the planning functions of the application, including the preliminary plat and zoning. He indicated the workload of the staff does not allow it to do a complete socio- economic study which would be required at a later time if the application progresses. A report from Mr. Runkle dated August 16, 1983 was reviewed with the understanding that the Planning Department has analyzed several aspects of the project. Firstly, the office retail/office showroom area consisting of 200 acres would consist of about 2,035,000 square feet and total parking spaces required of 7,461. Traffic generated would be approximatley 23,317 trips. The pro- posal is to construct the project within a period of 7 to 10 years, the evaluation would be $180,000,000.00 to $235,000,000.00 and possibly generate taxes in the neighborhood of about $8.2 million to $11.5 million, based on the 1982 tax rate. APC Minutes fAugust 23, 1983 Secondly, the report dealt with the effects of a Class A track facility in regard to land use and evaluation on the remaining 240 acre site. Com- parisons between the proposed track facility and other uses including the residential uses in relation to tax revenues and valuations were discussed, these included the trips generated, park dedication issues, etc., noting the race track facility would be a less intense use than other current RSC zoned use for shopping center. There wasalso discussion concerning the potential for amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan and reviewal by the Metropolitan Council. It was noted it would be about 20 years in construction if the racetrack is not included. Mr. Runkle stated that he received a detailed memorandum from the applicants the day before the hearing concerning land use and economic issues. Peter Jarvis of B.R.W., Inc. appeared on behalf of the applicant, as did several other persons. Mr. Jarvis briefly discussed fire protection, security, water supply, transportation in the area and access. Chairman Hall opened the hearing for public questions and comments and they included questions concerning filling the two ponds on the property and the potential water contamination. Mr. Hefti stated the waste would be re- moved daily and an EIS is expected to be prepared for the site. Dave Rolbecki, an owner in the general area, asked questions about tax increment and industrial revenue financing and objected that tax increment financing -would not generate as much tax revenue as for the City. Francis O'Neill asked if the use was in conformance with the proposed land use for the area and Mr. Runkle stated that would be a decision for the Planning Commission and Council. There was a question concerning the amount of office space and the timing, including whether the developers may be too optimistic with a surplus of office space in the area. It was noted, however, that the City is not directly involved in the economics of the office complex. The design of the buildings was a concern of another person present and it was noted the planned development process includes several stages, including detailed design stages. Also, the planned development zoning allows for changes during the process as opposed to fixed zoning for a specific use. One area resident objected to the race track use. It is expected that the cost of the racetrack facility would be about $25 to $30 million dollars, generating about $1.1 million dollars real estate tax per year. The public portion of the hearing was closed at 7:50 p.m. Member Turnham then reviewed the Minutes of the last Planning Commission meeting concerning the application and there was discussion concerning the timing for the Planned Development Agreement, and reversion in the event that construction did not take place according to the provision of the agreement. Traffic was an important issue to Planning Commission members, and comparisons were made with the Burnsville Center of 20,000 to 22,000 trips per day on Highway U42. Dodd Road will be improved beginning in the fall of 1983, according to information received. 2 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 Member Wold was concerned about saturation of office retail zoning in Eagan and it was noted that some competition will be created if developed. It was also stated that I-494 will not be completed if the track is opened in 1985 with the main access being from #55 initially, but later from I-494 and Highway 4149. Member McCrea asked if the Metro Council would review the proposal and it was understood that it would be involved in the EIS process, but it was expected that no amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be necessary. It was also noted that a meeting will be held with Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights officials concerning the proposal. Member Krob asked if the commercial area was only a smoke screen and if the race track is not approved for that location by the Minnesota Racing Facility Commission, what alternate will the developers place on the property. Mr. Jarvis stated that the intention would be to move ahead with mixed use, if the track is not approved, and the emphasis would be on non-residential uses, particularly office showroom. Also, there were questions whether there would be changes in the use of office buildings in the next 20 years, but Mr. Jarvis stated it would be hard to predict such changes. Member Krob again expressed his concern about the socio-economic issues. A letter from the South St. -Paul-Inver Grove Heights Chamber of Commerce favoring the project was read by Chairman Hall. Chairman Hall asked whether all enclosed spaces are sprinkled and the answer was in the affirmative. He recommended the planned development extend for no more than 10 years with the racetrack planned development por- tion a maximum of 3 years from the time of commencement of construction. He stated the site was not logical for shopping center, only because normal shopping mall centers are from 100 to 125 acres, and therefore felt that the planned development could be amended to allow for proposed uses. Mr. Hall also recommended Agricultural underlying zoning for the race track area by agreement. After nearly two hours of discussion, McCrea moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application of rezoning from RSC -PD and R-4 to PD (Planned Development), subject to the following conditions: 1. The Planned Development Agreement for the race track facility cover a maximum period of 3 years from the date of final council approval to the date of commencement of construction. 2. In the event that the Planned Development Agreement is in default, that the zoning will revert to Agricultural underlying zoning for the race facility 233.8 acres. 3. The balance of the property shall be intended for office re- tail/office showroom area to provide for a maximum 10 year development with underlying CSC zoning. 4. The Class A Race Track shall be determined to be an accepted use under the Planned Development. 3 iJ � • APC Minutes (( August 23, 1983 5. The Planned Development Agreement shall be executed by the applicant no later than 4 months from the date of Council approval of the planned development. 6. The park dedication requirements as imposed by the City will be fulfilled by the applicant. 7. A socio-economic impact study will be prepared and included in the planned development process. 8. The Planned Development Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to final execution. The Planning Commission members also recommended that the members' concerns at the July Planning Commission meeting be incorporated into the Planned Development process, noting that the City's economic development image and land values are effected by the outcome of the planned development. All voted in favor. Krob then moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application for preliminary plat, subject to all conditions imposed by the staff and approved by the City Council, to be attached to the Development Agreement. All voted in favor. MARJORIE J. BRANDT - WAIVER OF PLAT The public hearing concerning. the application of Marjorie J. Brandt for waiver of plat for Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Country Home Heights Addition was next convened by the Chairman. Ms. Brandt was present and indicated that she requested the waiver for both physical and economic reasons and felt that the change in lot line would not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood. The objective is to eventually sell her home and that the garage located on the two lots be included with the lot on which the house is located. There were no objections to the application. The end result would include 27,900 square feet for Lot 4, and 45,000 square feet for Lot 5. Krob moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: I. All necessary easements shall be dedicated to the City as recom- mended by City staff. 2. All applicable ordinances shall be complied with. All voted yes. E APC Minutes ( August 23, 1983 1: - KINDER KOLLEGE, INC. _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DAY CARE CENTER The next public hearing concerned the application of Kinder Kollege, Inc. for conditional use permit for the establishment of a day care center in the former Mr. Steak restaurant in the Cedarvale Shopping Center area. Mr. Runkle reviewed the application and there were no objections. A representative of the applicant was present and stated that nearly all children will be full time with the base play area being asphalt, covered with a pea sized gravel. He stated that possibly a latch key operation will be provided for children above age 5. Krob emphasized the need for a location for children above the age of 5, after school. The Planning Commission discussed whether the pro- posal would be a use deemed similar for conditional use permit under CSC zoning. The facility would be licensed by the State Department of Public Welfare. After discussion, Wold moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application with the understanding, however, that such an establishment would not in all cases, be allowed in CSC zoning, but it appears to be appropriate because of the favorable traffic patterns, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation shall be from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 2. This use shall meet all State licensing requirements. 3. This proposed newly -created lot shall be subject to the Park Commis- sion's review and comment. 4. All applicable City Ordinances shall be met. All voted yea. NATIONAL CHILD CARE CENTERS, INC. - DAY CARE CENTER The next hearing concerned the application of National Child Care Centers, Inc. for conditional use permit for day care center on Lot 3, Block 1, Hilltop Plaza. Mr. Runkle presented the application to the Planning Com- mission and stated that the neighborhood business district provision does not provide for day care facility as a permitted, conditional or accessory use. However, the provision allowing for uses deemed similar by the Council could be allowed as a conditional use. The 8,316 square foot building would accom- modate 165 to 175 children, up to the age of 5, but it was understood that the latch key operation may also be implemented. Representatives of National Child Care Center, a nine -state area child care company, were present and stated the operation is full-service with company-owned vans to pick up and deliver children. There was considerable discussion concerning the establish- ment of a lot line to provide for a building not in excess of 20% square foot 5 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 coverage of the lot, and it was understood that the developer of the subdivi- sion will subdivide as required by the City. There were also questions con- cerning architectural matching and the representatives indicated the face brick will match the shopping center building. There being no objections, Krob moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the applica- tion, subject to the following conditions: 1. The lot line shall be established so the building would cover no more than 20% of the lot through approval of waiver of plat on subdivision approval. 2. The hours of operation shall be from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 3. The applicant shall meet all State licensing requirements. 4. This proposed newly -created lot shall be subject to the Park Commis- sion's review and recommendation. 5• All applicable ordinances shall be complied with. 6. Easements shall be dedicated as required by the City. All voted in favor.. A.J. ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing concerning the application of Tri -Land Co., Inc., Bradley Swenson, for preliminary plat for A. J. Addition, consisting of approximately one acre containing 3 single family lots on County Road 026 and Egan Avenue was next opened by the Chairman. Mr. Runkle presented the appli- cation on behalf of the staff and stated that he understood that Lots 2 and 3 have consent from the Dakota County Highway Department for access to Lone Oak Road. Staff would recommend a single common access to Lone Oak Road. Brad Swenson appeared for the applicant and a number of objecting neighboring owners also appeared. One owner across the street indicated that he under- stood that he could not get access to Lone Oak Road and therefore did not do so when he built his home. Chuck Maloney of Country Home Heights Addition stated that it was his opinion that 48 feet by 330 feet of the Country Home Heights Addition was excluded from the application. It was noted, however, that a portion of Lot 8 was included in the applicant's land area. There were also objections that the protective covenants would not allow for a split of lot and Mr. Swenson stated that it was his understanding that the covenants j - have now expired. Drainage issues, possible lack of parking, the fact that the other lots in Country Home Heights Addition are large lots and the neigh- bor directly to the north indicated he was assured that there would only be APC Minutes August 23, 1983 one house on the lot, were some objections that were raised. There was also an objection to the staff's recommendation that credit for the extra cost of boring under Lone Oak Road for utility access be given, but it was noted this was recommended because of the distance required for access purposes. Also, there will be a median on Lone Oak Road, which would permit only right turn in and out. Mr. Swenson stated that in 1969 the owner of the land gave one-half acre to the County in exchange for access and a culvert to Lone Oak Road and it was also noted that Lot 8 had been split at an earlier time, and thus the reason for including it in the proposed A. J. Addition. After considerable discus- sion, Hall moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend denial of the applica- tion for reasons that were expressed by the neighbors, including the following: I. That the covenants appear to prohibit the split of a lot for con- structibn of more than one building for each platted lot in Country Home Heights Addition. 2. There is uncertainty as to whether the access to Lone Oak Road is permitted, but in any event, extreme safety problems would clearly be created by direct access to Lone Oak Road. 3. There is inadequate parking with potential parking on Lone Oak Road and ,also on Egan Avenue. 4. Further, all reasons cited in the discussion portion above. All voted in favor. GONYEA COMPANY - BEAD D' RUE DRIVE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The hearing regarding the application of Gonyea Company and Dennis D. Gonyea for preliminary plat approval for proposed Beau D' Rue Drive Addition was brought before the Planning Commission. Mr. Runkle discussed the applica- tion and stated that no other specific uses are planned other than two existing buildings, but noted that two larger buildings are proposed on the property. Mike Gair, Planner, appeared for the applicant and explained the proposal in detail. He stated that he generally agreed with staff's recommen- dations, but that the applicant would prefer to avoid the requirement for common parking. The actual uses of the property are uncertain and the size of the buildings has not been determined. A number of neighboring property owners were present and stated that the soil is very unstable and therefore additional grading and retaining walls may not be desirable in the area. Mr. Krob had concerns about storm drainage and proposed that a storm sewer project be installed to provide for the drainage. Specific parking plans will be provided in the future as the development takes place. A number of neighbor- ing property owners were present and expressed• concerns about the proposal and also objected to the current condition of the buildings on the parcel. Wold moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following conditions: 7 1 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 1. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff at the time of building permit applica- tion. 2. The applicant shall connect some of the back parking areas together in order to allow better traffic circulation in the rear of the buildings. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff, and a landscape bond shall be submitted for an amount approved by the staff and not released until one year after the landscaping has been com- pleted. 4. The parking area shall be surfaced and concrete curbing shall be provided around the perimeter of the parking area. 5. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's comments and recommendations and park dedication requirements shall be met. 6. The plan shall be subject to all other City Code requirements. 7. If installed privately, plans and specifications for utility services shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted to the Engineering Department for approval. 8. Internal driveways shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 9. A 40 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Beau D' Rue Drive. 10. Easements shall be dedicated according to recommendations of the staff. 11. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessment at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 12. All other improvements shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 13. A storm sewer outlet shall be installed to the staffs specifica- tions, in the southeast area of the plat to accommodate drainage. All voted in favor. APC Minutes August 23, 1983 re U. S. HOMES CORPORATION - RIDGECLIFFE ADDITIONS REZONING - WAIVER OF PLAT - PRELIMINARY PLATS The hearings regarding the applications of U. S. Homes - Orrin Thompson Homes for rezoning, waiver of plat and approval of two preliminary plats for Ridgecliffe 6th and 7th Additions was convened by the Chairman. Mr. Runkle introduced the applications: A. Ridgecliffe 6th Addition - Preliminary Plat. An application for preliminary plat approval of Ridgecliffe 6th Addition consisting of 3.3 acres and containing 8 single family lots, located on Outlot D, Ridgecliffe 1st Addition, and parts of Outlots A and B, Park Ridge Addition, was presented. It was noted that this was simply an extension of the Park Ridge Addition plat and there Were no objections to the application. It was noted that Lot 5 is under 12,000 square feet. Hall moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: I. Lot 5 shall include a minimum of 12,000 square feet area. 2. Detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be sub- mitted and approved by City staff. 3. All City ordinances shall be adhered to. 4. A Development Agreement shall be entered into and executed by the City and the Developer. 5. All easements shall be dedicated to the City as requested by City staff. 6. The water main shall be looped in accordance with engineering requirements. 7. No variances shall be allowed except for topographic or vegetation reasons. All voted yea. B. Ridgecliffe 7th Addition - Preliminary Plat. The next application proposed would be a revision to small single family lots, providing for Lots 1 through 12, Block 1, Ridgecliffe 4th Addition to be platted into Ridgecliffe 7th Addition. The application also was for R-1 Planned Development to allow deviation and a reduction in the overall density. Bill Fierke was present on behalf of the applicant, as was Chuck Winden, Surveyor. Each house would have E APC Minutes August 23, 1983 an entire use of one side yard, and there would also be small front and back yards. The largest home would sell for about $100,000.00 and the zero lot line concept would be implemented. Some private easements would be set up and the City could also acquire easements along the lot lines. The President of Ridgecliffe Association and other residents in the area were present and objected to certain aspects of the application. The President stated that he had not gotten advanced notification, that there were covenants that the Association members were concerned about, and objected to ten houses, where only six lots were now provided. Architectural control was an important issue for the Association. Krob moved, Wold seconded the motion to continue the application concerning the 7th Addition until the next meeting to allow con- sultation between the developer and the Townhouse Association Board. All voted yes. C. Rezoning from R-2 to R-1 PD and Waiver of Plat for Lots 22 and 23' Block 9_ and Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 10, Ridgecliffe 1st Addition. The proposed rezoning was from R-2 to R-1 PD for two duplex lots to contain five single family parcels. There were no objections to the application. Wold was concerned about the size of the lots and the architectural controls which he felt were more important with smaller lots. It was noted there was a swamp on the east side, north of Karis Way, and a berm was intended to be installed along Calaxie Avenue. Krob moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application for rezoning and waiver of plat to shift lots lines, subject to the following conditions: 1. The lot line for Lot 15, Block 10 will be cooed to provide for a minimum 60 foot front yard width. 2. The exhibits showing the three proposed house pads be included in the Development Agreement and there be assurance of architectural conformity. 3. A Planned Development Agreement shall be prepared and signed covering all necessary City conditions as recommended by staff. All voted affirmatively. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by McCrea, seconded Krob, it was resolved that the meeting adjourn at 11:55 p.m. All voted yea. PHH Secretary 10 0 MINUTES OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA AUGUST 23, 1983 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, August 23, 1983 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. Those present were Chairman Hall, Members Turnham, Krob, McCrea and Wold. Absent were Bohne, Wilkins and Mulrooney. Also present were City Planner Runkle, Assistant City -Engineer Hefti and City Attorney Hauge. AGENDA Upon motion by McCrea, seconded Turnham, it was resolved that the Agenda be approved with the understanding that Agendaitem IIIA. consisting of the John Charles Gruidl application for conditional use permit will be continued indefinitely and that item G. consisting of the Will Stenzel Construction Co. application for preliminary plat approval of Pheasant Knoll be continued until the next regular meeting. All voted yes. � Uh4 July 26, 1983 - Regular meeting. Upon motion by Turnham, seconded McCrea, it was resolved that the Minutes be approved. All voted yea. LAUKKA-BECK - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The continued public hearing concerning the application of Laukka-Beck for rezoning from RSC -PD (Regional Shopping Center Planned Development District) and R-4 (Residential Multiple) to PD (Planned Development) and for preliminary plat approval of Laukka-Beck Eagan, containing 458.1 acres in the area of I-494 and Highway #55 was convened by Chairman Charles Hall. The City Planner, Dale Runkle, presented a resume' of information gathered since the last regular meeting of July 26, 1983 and stated that the City Council directed the Planning Commission to direct its efforts toward the planning functions of the application, including the preliminary plat and zoning. He indicated the workload of the staff does not allow it to do a complete socio- economic study which would be required at a later time if the application progresses. A report from Mr. Runkle dated August 16, 1983 was reviewed with the understanding that the Planning Department has analyzed several aspects of the project. Firstly, the office retail/office showroom area consisting of 200 acres would consist of about 2,035,000 square feet and total parking spaces required of 7,461. Traffic generated would be approximatley 23,317 trips. The pro- posal is to construct the project within a period of 7 to 10 years, the evaluation would be $180,000,000.00 to $235,000,000.00 and possibly generate taxes in the neighborhood of about $8.2 million to $11.5 million, based on the 1982 tax rate. APC Minutes August 23, 1983 Secondly, the report dealt with the effects of a Class A track facility in regard to land use and evaluation on the remaining 240 acre site. Com- parisons between the proposed track facility and other uses including the residential uses in relation to tax revenues and valuations were discussed, these included the trips generated, park dedication issues, etc., noting the race track facility would be a less intense use than other current RSC zoned use for shopping center. There was also discussion concerning the potential for amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan and reviewal by the Metropolitan Council. It was noted it would be about 20 years in construction if the racetrack is not included. Mr. Runkle stated that he received a detailed memorandum from the applicants the day before the hearing concerning land use and economic issues. Peter Jarvis of B.R.W., Inc. appeared on behalf of the applicant, as did several other persons. Mr. Jarvis briefly discussed fire protection, security, water supply, transportation in the area and access. Chairman Hall opened the hearing for public questions and comments and they included questions concerning filling the two ponds on, the property and the potential water contamination. Mr. Hefti stated the waste would be re- moved daily and an EIS is expected to be prepared for the site. Dave Rolbecki, an owner in the general area, asked questions about tax increment and industrial revenue financing and objected that tax increment financing -would not generate as much tax revenue.as for the City. Francis O'Neill asked if the use was in conformance with the proposed land use for the area and Mr. Runkle stated that would be a decision for the Planning Commission and Council. There was a question concerning the amount of.office space and the timing, including whether the developers may be too optimistic with a surplus of office space in the area. It was noted, however, that the City is not directly involved in the economics of the office complex. The design of the buildings was a concern of another person present and it was noted the planned development process includes several stages, including detailed design stages. Also, the planned development zoning allows for changes during the process as opposed to fixed zoning for a specific use. One area resident objected to the race track use. It is expected that the cost of the racetrack facility would be about $25 to $30 million dollars, generating about $1.1 million dollars real estate tax per year. The public portion of the hearing was closed at 7:50 p.m. Member Turnham then reviewed the Minutes of the last Planning Commission meeting concerning the application and there was discussion concerning the timing for the Planned Development Agreement, and reversion in the event that construction did not take place according to the provision of the agreement. Traffic was an important issue to Planning Commission members, and comparisons were made with the Burnsville Center of 20,000 to 22,000 trips per day on Highway 042. Dodd Road will be improved beginning in the fall of 1983, according to information received. 2 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 Member Wold was concerned about saturation of office retail zoning in Eagan and it was noted that some competition will be created if developed. It was also stated that I-494 will not be completed if the track is opened in 1985 with the main access being from 1155 initially, but later from I-494 and Highway 11149. Member McCrea asked if the Metro Council would review the proposal and it was understood that it would be involved in the EIS process, but it was expected that no amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be necessary. It was also noted that a meeting will be held with Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights officials concerning the proposal. Member Krob asked if the commercial area was only a smoke screen and if the race track is not approved for that location by the Minnesota Racing Facility Commission, what alternate will the developers place on the property. Mr. Jarvis stated that the intention would be to move ahead with mixed use, if the track is not approved, and the emphasis would be on non-residential uses, particularly office showroom. Also, there were questions whether there would be changes in the use of office buildings in the next 20 years, but Mr. Jarvis stated it would be hard to predict such changes. Member Krob again expressed his concern about the socio-economic issues. A letter from the South St. Paul -Inver Grove Heights Chamber of Commerce favoring the project was read by Chairman Hall. Chairman Hall asked whether all enclosed spaces are sprinkled and the answer was in the affirmative. He recommended the planned development extend for no more than 10 years with the racetrack planned development por- tion a maximum of 3 years from the time of commencement of construction. He stated the site was not logical for shopping center, only because normal shopping mall centers are from 100 to 125 acres, and therefore felt that the planned development could be amended to allow for proposed uses. Mr. Hall also recommended Agricultural underlying zoning for the race track area by agreement. After nearly two hours of discussion, McCrea moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application of rezoning from RSC -PD and R-4 to PD (Planned Development), subject to the following conditions: 1. The Planned Development Agreement for the race track facility cover a maximum period of 3 years from the date of final council approval to the date of commencement of construction. 2. In the event that the Planned Development Agreement is in default, that the zoning will revert to Agricultural underlying zoning for the race facility 233.8 acres. 3. The balance of the property shall be intended for office re- tail/office showroom area to provide for a maximum 10 year development with underlying CSC zoning. 4. The Class A Race Track shall be determined to be an accepted use under the Planned Development. Q 0 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 40 5. The Planned Development Agreement shall be executed by the applicant no later than 4 months from the date of Council approval of the planned development. 6. The park dedication requirements as imposed by the City will be fulfilled by the applicant. 7. A socio-economic impact study will be prepared and included in the planned development process. 8. The Planned Development Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to final execution. The Planning Commission members also recommended that the members' concerns at the July Planning Commission meeting be incorporated into the Planned Development process, noting that the City's economic development image and land values are effected by the outcome of the planned development. All voted in favor. Krob then moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application for preliminary plat, subject to all conditions imposed by the staff and approved by the City Council, to be attached to the Development Agreement. All voted in favor. MARJORIE J. BRANDT - WAIVER OF PLAT The public hearing concerning the application of Marjorie J. Brandt for waiver of plat for Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Country Home Heights Addition was next convened by the Chairman. Ms. Brandt was present and indicated that she requested the waiver for both physical and economic reasons and felt that the change in lot line would not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood. The objective is to eventually sell her home and that the garage located on the two lots be included with the lot on which the house is located. There were no objections to the application. The end result would include 27,900 square feet for Lot 4, and 45,000 square feet for Lot 5. Krob moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. All necessary easements shall be dedicated to the City as recom- mended by City staff. 2. All applicable ordinances shall be complied with. All voted yes. 4 0 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 11 KINDER KOLLECE, INC. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DAY CARE CENTER .The next public hearing concerned the application of Kinder Kollege, Inc. for conditional use permit for the establishment of a day care center in the former Mr. Steak restaurant in the Cedarvale Shopping Center area. Mr. Runkle reviewed the application and there were no objections. A representative of the applicant was present and stated that nearly all children will be full time with the base play area being asphalt, covered with a pea sized gravel. He stated that possibly a latch key operation will be provided for children above age 5. Krob emphasized the need for a location for children above the age of 5, after school. The Planning Commission discussed whether the pro- posal would be a use deemed similar for conditional use permit under CSC zoning. The facility would be licensed by the State Department of Public Welfare. After discussion, Wold moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application with the understanding, however, that such an establishment would not in all cases, be allowed in CSC zoning, but it appears to be appropriate because of the favorable traffic patterns, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation shall be from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 2. This use shall meet all State licensing requirements. 3. This proposed newly -created lot shall be subject to the Park Commis- sion's review and comment. 4. All applicable City Ordinances shall be met. All voted yea. NATIONAL CHILD CARE CENTERS, INC. - DAY CARE CENTER The next hearing concerned the application of National Child Care Centers, Inc. for conditional use permit for day care center on Lot 3, Block 1, Hilltop Plaza. Mr. Runkle presented the application to the Planning Com- mission and stated that the neighborhood business district provision does not provide for day care facility as a permitted, conditional or accessory use. However, the provision allowing for uses deemed similar by the Council could be allowed as a conditional use. The 8,316 square foot building would accom- modate 165 to 175 children, up to the age of 5, but it was understood that the latch key operation may also be implemented. Representatives of National Child Care Center, a nine -state area child care company, were present and stated the operation is full-service with company-owned vans to pick up and deliver children. There was considerable discussion concerning the establish- ment of a lot line to provide for a building not in excess of 20% square foot 9 0 0 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 coverage of the lot, and it was understood that the developer of the subdivi- sion will subdivide as required by the City. There were also questions con- cerning architectural matching and the representatives indicated the face brick will match the shopping center building. There being no objections, Krob moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the applica- tion, subject to the following conditions: 1. The lot line shall be established so the building would cover no more than 20% of the lot through approval of waiver of plat on subdivision approval. 2. The hours of operation shall be from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 3. The applicant shall meet all State licensing requirements. 4. This proposed newly -created lot shall be subject to the Park Commis- sion's review and recommendation. 5. All applicable ordinances shall be complied with. 6. Easements shall be dedicated as required by the City. All voted in favor. A.J. ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing concerning the application of Tri -Land Co., Inc., Bradley Swenson, for preliminary plat for A. J. Addition, consisting of approximately one acre containing 3 single family lots on County Road 1126 and Egan Avenue was next opened by the Chairman. Mr. Runkle presented the appli- cation on behalf of the staff and stated that he understood that Lots 2 and 3 have consent from the Dakota County Highway Department for access to Lone Oak Road. Staff would recommend a single common access to Lone Oak Road. Brad Swenson appeared for the applicant and a number of objecting neighboring owners also appeared. One owner across the street indicated that he under- stood that he could not get access to Lone Oak Road and therefore did not do so when he built his home. Chuck Maloney of Country Home Heights. Addition stated that it was his opinion that 48 feet by 330 feet of the Country Home Heights Addition was excluded from the application. It was noted, however, that a portion of Lot 8 was included in the applicant's land area. There were also objections that the protective covenants would not allow for a split of lot and Mr. Swenson stated that it was his understanding that the covenants have now expired. Drainage issues, possible lack of parking, the fact that the other lots in Country Home Heights Addition are large lots and the neigh- bor directly to the north indicated he was assured that there would only be [: 0 9 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 one house on the lot, were some objections that were raised. There was also an objection to the staff's recommendation that credit for the extra cost of boring under Lone Oak Road for utility access be given, but it was noted this was recommended because of the distance required for access purposes. Also, there will be a median on Lone Oak Road, which would permit only right turn in and out. Mr. Swenson stated that in 1969 the owner of the land gave one-half acre to the County in exchange for access and a culvert to Lone Oak Road and it was also noted that Lot 8 had been split at an earlier time, and thus the reason for including it in the proposed A. J. Addition. After considerable discus- sion, Hall moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend denial of the applica- tion for reasons that were expressed by the neighbors, including the following: 1. That the covenants appear to prohibit the split of a lot for con- struction of more than one building for each platted lot in Country Home Heights Addition. 2. There is uncertainty as to whether the access to Lone Oak Road is permitted, but in any event, extreme safety problems would clearly be created by direct access to Lone Oak Road. 3. There is inadequate parking with potential parking on Lone Oak Road and also on Egan Avenue. 4. Further, all reasons cited in the discussion portion above. All voted in favor. GONYEA COMPANY - BEAD D' RDE DRIVE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The hearing regarding the application of Gonyea Company and Dennis D. Gonyea for preliminary plat approval for proposed Beau D' Rue Drive Addition was brought before the Planning Commission. Mr. Runkle discussed the applica- tion and stated that no other specific uses are planned other than two existing buildings, but noted that two larger buildings are proposed on the property. Mike Gair, Planner, appeared for the applicant and explained the proposal in detail. He stated that he generally agreed with staff's recommen- dations, but that the applicant, would prefer to avoid the requirement for common parking. The actual uses of the property are uncertain and the size of the buildings has not been determined. A number of neighboring property owners were present and stated that the soil is very unstable and therefore additional grading and retaining walls may not be desirable in the area. Mr. Krob had concerns about storm drainage and proposed that a storm sewer project be installed to provide for the drainage. Specific parking plans will be provided in the future as the development takes place. A number of neighbor- ing property owners were present and expressed concerns about the proposal and also objected to the current condition of the buildings on the parcel. Wold moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following conditions: 7 0 0 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 1. A detailed_ grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff at the time of building permit applica- tion. 2. The applicant shall connect some of the back parking areas together in order to allow better traffic circulation in the rear of the buildings. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff, and a landscape bond shall be submitted for an amount approved by the staff and not released until one year after the landscaping has been com- pleted. 4. The parking area shall be surfaced and concrete curbing shall.be provided around the perimeter of the parking area. 5. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's comments and recommendations and park dedication requirements shall be met. 6. The plan shall be subject to all other City Code requirements. 7. If installed privately, plans and specifications for utility services shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted to the "w Engineering Department for approval. 8. Internal driveways shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 9. A 40 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Beau D' Rue Drive. 10. Easements shall be dedicated according to recommendations of the staff. 11. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessment at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 12. All other improvements shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 13. A storm sewer outlet shall be installed to the staff's specifica- tions, in the southeast area of the plat to accommodate drainage. All voted in favor. 8 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 0 0 U. S. HOMES CORPORATION - RIDGECLIFFE ADDITIONS REZONING - WAIVER OF PLAT - PRELIMINARY PLATS The hearings regarding the applications of U. S. Homes - Orrin Thompson Homes for rezoning, waiver of plat and approval of two preliminary plats for Ridgecliffe 6th and 7th Additions was convened by the Chairman. Mr. Runkle introduced the applications: A. Ridgecliffe 6th Addition - Preliminary Plat. An application for preliminary plat approval of Ridgecliffe 6th Addition consisting of 3.3 acres and containing 8 single family lots, located on Outlot D, Ridgecliffe 1st Addition, and parts of Outlots A and B, Park Ridge Addition, was presented. It was noted that this was simply an extension of the Park Ridge Addition plat and there were no objections to the application. It was noted that Lot 5 is under 12,000 square feet. Hall moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot 5 shall include a minimum of 12,000 square feet area. 2. Detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be sub- mitted and approved by City staff. 3. All City ordinances shall be adhered to. 4. A Development Agreement shall be entered into and executed by the City and the Developer. 5. All easements shall be dedicated to the City as requested by City staff. 6. The water main shall be looped in accordance with engineering requirements. 7. No variances shall be allowed except for topographic or vegetation reasons. All voted yea. B. Ridgecliffe 7th Addition - Preliminary Plat. The next application proposed would be a revision to small single family lots, providing for Lots 1 through 12, Block 1, Ridgecliffe 4th Addition to be platted into Ridgecliffe 7th Addition. The application also was for R-1 Planned Development to allow deviation and a reduction in the overall density. Bill Fierke was present on behalf of the applicant, as was Chuck Winden, Surveyor. Each house would have 0 0 0 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 an entire use of one side yard, and there would also be small front and back yards. The largest home would sell for about $100,000.00 and the zero lot line concept would be implemented. Some private easements would be set up and the City could also acquire easements along the lot lines. The President of Ridgecliffe Association and other residents in the area were present and objected to certain aspects of the application. The President stated that he had not gotten advanced notification, that there were covenants that the Association members were concerned about, and objected to ten houses, where only six lots were now provided. Architectural control was an important issue for the Association. Krob moved, Wold seconded the motion to continue the application concerning the 7th Addition until the next meeting to allow con- sultation between the developer and the Townhouse Association Board. All voted yes. C. Rezoning from R-2 to R-1 PD and Waiver of Plat for Lots 22 and 23, Block 9t and Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 10, Ridgecliffe lst Addition. The proposed rezoning was from R-2 to R-1 PD for two duplex lots to contain five single family parcels. There were no objections to the application. Wold was concerned about the size of the lots and the architectural controls which he felt were more important with smaller lots. It was noted there was a swamp on the east side, north of Karis Way, and a berm was intended to be installed along Calaxie Avenue. Krob moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application for rezoning and waiver of plat to shift lots lines, subject to the following conditions: 1. The lot line for Lot 15, Block 10 will be moed to provide for a minimum 60 foot front yard width. 2. The exhibits showing the three proposed house pads be included in the Development Agreement and there be assurance of architectural conformity. 3. A Planned Development Agreement shall be prepared and signed covering all necessary City conditions as recommended by staff. All voted affirmatively. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by McCrea, seconded Krob, it was resolved that the meeting adjourn at 11:55 p.m. All voted yea. PHH Secretary iH MINUTES OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA AUGUST 23, 1983 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, August 23, 1983 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. Those present were Chairman Hall, Members Turnham, Krob, McCrea and Wold. Absent were Bonne, Wilkins and Mulrooney. Also present were City Planner Runkle, Assistant City Engineer Hefti and City Attorney Hauge. AGENDA Upon motion by McCrea, seconded Turnham, it was resolved that the Agenda be approved with the understanding that Agendaitem III.A. consisting of the John Charles Gruidl application for conditional use permit will be continued indefinitely and that item G. consisting of the Will Stenzel Construction Co. application for preliminary plat approval of Pheasant Knoll be continued until the next regular meeting. All voted yes. July 26, 1983 - Regular meeting. Upon motion by Turnham, seconded McCrea, it was resolved that the Minutes be approved. All voted yea. LAUKKA-BECK - REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT The continued public hearing concerning the application of Laukka-Beck for rezoning from RSC -PD (Regional Shopping Center Planned Development District) and R-4 (Residential Multiple) to PD (Planned Development) and for preliminary plat approval of Laukka-Beck Eagan, containing 458.1 acres in the area of I-494 and Highway 455 was convened by Chairman Charles Hall. The City Planner, Dale Runkle, presented a resume' of information gathered since the last regular meeting of July 26, 1983 and stated that the City Council directed the Planning Commission to direct its efforts toward the planning functions of the application, including the preliminary plat and zoning. He indicated the workload of the staff does not allow it to do a complete socio- economic study which would be required at a later time if the application progresses. A report from Mr. Runkle dated August 16, 1983 was reviewed with the understanding that the Planning Department has analyzed several aspects of the project. Firstly, the office retail/office showroom area consisting of 200 acres would consist of about 2,035,000 square feet and total parking spaces required of 7,461. Traffic generated would be approximatley 23,317 trips. The pro- posal is to construct the project within a period of 7 to 10 years, the evaluation would be $180,000,000.00 to $235,000,000.00 and possibly generate taxes in the neighborhood of about $8.2 million to $11.5 million, based on the 1982 tax rate. APC Minutes fAugust 23, 1983 Secondly, the report dealt with the effects of a Class A track facility in regard to land use and evaluation on the remaining 240 acre site. Com- parisons between the proposed track facility and other uses including the residential uses in relation to tax revenues and valuations were discussed, these included the trips generated, park dedication issues, etc., noting the race track facility would be a less intense use than other current RSC zoned use for shopping center. There wasalso discussion concerning the potential for amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan and reviewal by the Metropolitan Council. It was noted it would be about 20 years in construction if the racetrack is not included. Mr. Runkle stated that he received a detailed memorandum from the applicants the day before the hearing concerning land use and economic issues. Peter Jarvis of B.R.W., Inc. appeared on behalf of the applicant, as did several other persons. Mr. Jarvis briefly discussed fire protection, security, water supply, transportation in the area and access. Chairman Hall opened the hearing for public questions and comments and they included questions concerning filling the two ponds on the property and the potential water contamination. Mr. Hefti stated the waste would be re- moved daily and an EIS is expected to be prepared for the site. Dave Rolbecki, an owner in the general area, asked questions about tax increment and industrial revenue financing and objected that tax increment financing -would not generate as much tax revenue as for the City. Francis O'Neill asked if the use was in conformance with the proposed land use for the area and Mr. Runkle stated that would be a decision for the Planning Commission and Council. There was a question concerning the amount of office space and the timing, including whether the developers may be too optimistic with a surplus of office space in the area. It was noted, however, that the City is not directly involved in the economics of the office complex. The design of the buildings was a concern of another person present and it was noted the planned development process includes several stages, including detailed design stages. Also, the planned development zoning allows for changes during the process as opposed to fixed zoning for a specific use. One area resident objected to the race track use. It is expected that the cost of the racetrack facility would be about $25 to $30 million dollars, generating about $1.1 million dollars real estate tax per year. The public portion of the hearing was closed at 7:50 p.m. Member Turnham then reviewed the Minutes of the last Planning Commission meeting concerning the application and there was discussion concerning the timing for the Planned Development Agreement, and reversion in the event that construction did not take place according to the provision of the agreement. Traffic was an important issue to Planning Commission members, and comparisons were made with the Burnsville Center of 20,000 to 22,000 trips per day on Highway U42. Dodd Road will be improved beginning in the fall of 1983, according to information received. 2 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 Member Wold was concerned about saturation of office retail zoning in Eagan and it was noted that some competition will be created if developed. It was also stated that I-494 will not be completed if the track is opened in 1985 with the main access being from #55 initially, but later from I-494 and Highway 4149. Member McCrea asked if the Metro Council would review the proposal and it was understood that it would be involved in the EIS process, but it was expected that no amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be necessary. It was also noted that a meeting will be held with Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights officials concerning the proposal. Member Krob asked if the commercial area was only a smoke screen and if the race track is not approved for that location by the Minnesota Racing Facility Commission, what alternate will the developers place on the property. Mr. Jarvis stated that the intention would be to move ahead with mixed use, if the track is not approved, and the emphasis would be on non-residential uses, particularly office showroom. Also, there were questions whether there would be changes in the use of office buildings in the next 20 years, but Mr. Jarvis stated it would be hard to predict such changes. Member Krob again expressed his concern about the socio-economic issues. A letter from the South St. -Paul-Inver Grove Heights Chamber of Commerce favoring the project was read by Chairman Hall. Chairman Hall asked whether all enclosed spaces are sprinkled and the answer was in the affirmative. He recommended the planned development extend for no more than 10 years with the racetrack planned development por- tion a maximum of 3 years from the time of commencement of construction. He stated the site was not logical for shopping center, only because normal shopping mall centers are from 100 to 125 acres, and therefore felt that the planned development could be amended to allow for proposed uses. Mr. Hall also recommended Agricultural underlying zoning for the race track area by agreement. After nearly two hours of discussion, McCrea moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application of rezoning from RSC -PD and R-4 to PD (Planned Development), subject to the following conditions: 1. The Planned Development Agreement for the race track facility cover a maximum period of 3 years from the date of final council approval to the date of commencement of construction. 2. In the event that the Planned Development Agreement is in default, that the zoning will revert to Agricultural underlying zoning for the race facility 233.8 acres. 3. The balance of the property shall be intended for office re- tail/office showroom area to provide for a maximum 10 year development with underlying CSC zoning. 4. The Class A Race Track shall be determined to be an accepted use under the Planned Development. 3 iJ � • APC Minutes (( August 23, 1983 5. The Planned Development Agreement shall be executed by the applicant no later than 4 months from the date of Council approval of the planned development. 6. The park dedication requirements as imposed by the City will be fulfilled by the applicant. 7. A socio-economic impact study will be prepared and included in the planned development process. 8. The Planned Development Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to final execution. The Planning Commission members also recommended that the members' concerns at the July Planning Commission meeting be incorporated into the Planned Development process, noting that the City's economic development image and land values are effected by the outcome of the planned development. All voted in favor. Krob then moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application for preliminary plat, subject to all conditions imposed by the staff and approved by the City Council, to be attached to the Development Agreement. All voted in favor. MARJORIE J. BRANDT - WAIVER OF PLAT The public hearing concerning. the application of Marjorie J. Brandt for waiver of plat for Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Country Home Heights Addition was next convened by the Chairman. Ms. Brandt was present and indicated that she requested the waiver for both physical and economic reasons and felt that the change in lot line would not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood. The objective is to eventually sell her home and that the garage located on the two lots be included with the lot on which the house is located. There were no objections to the application. The end result would include 27,900 square feet for Lot 4, and 45,000 square feet for Lot 5. Krob moved, Turnham seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: I. All necessary easements shall be dedicated to the City as recom- mended by City staff. 2. All applicable ordinances shall be complied with. All voted yes. E APC Minutes ( August 23, 1983 1: - KINDER KOLLEGE, INC. _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DAY CARE CENTER The next public hearing concerned the application of Kinder Kollege, Inc. for conditional use permit for the establishment of a day care center in the former Mr. Steak restaurant in the Cedarvale Shopping Center area. Mr. Runkle reviewed the application and there were no objections. A representative of the applicant was present and stated that nearly all children will be full time with the base play area being asphalt, covered with a pea sized gravel. He stated that possibly a latch key operation will be provided for children above age 5. Krob emphasized the need for a location for children above the age of 5, after school. The Planning Commission discussed whether the pro- posal would be a use deemed similar for conditional use permit under CSC zoning. The facility would be licensed by the State Department of Public Welfare. After discussion, Wold moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application with the understanding, however, that such an establishment would not in all cases, be allowed in CSC zoning, but it appears to be appropriate because of the favorable traffic patterns, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation shall be from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 2. This use shall meet all State licensing requirements. 3. This proposed newly -created lot shall be subject to the Park Commis- sion's review and comment. 4. All applicable City Ordinances shall be met. All voted yea. NATIONAL CHILD CARE CENTERS, INC. - DAY CARE CENTER The next hearing concerned the application of National Child Care Centers, Inc. for conditional use permit for day care center on Lot 3, Block 1, Hilltop Plaza. Mr. Runkle presented the application to the Planning Com- mission and stated that the neighborhood business district provision does not provide for day care facility as a permitted, conditional or accessory use. However, the provision allowing for uses deemed similar by the Council could be allowed as a conditional use. The 8,316 square foot building would accom- modate 165 to 175 children, up to the age of 5, but it was understood that the latch key operation may also be implemented. Representatives of National Child Care Center, a nine -state area child care company, were present and stated the operation is full-service with company-owned vans to pick up and deliver children. There was considerable discussion concerning the establish- ment of a lot line to provide for a building not in excess of 20% square foot 5 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 coverage of the lot, and it was understood that the developer of the subdivi- sion will subdivide as required by the City. There were also questions con- cerning architectural matching and the representatives indicated the face brick will match the shopping center building. There being no objections, Krob moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the applica- tion, subject to the following conditions: 1. The lot line shall be established so the building would cover no more than 20% of the lot through approval of waiver of plat on subdivision approval. 2. The hours of operation shall be from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. 3. The applicant shall meet all State licensing requirements. 4. This proposed newly -created lot shall be subject to the Park Commis- sion's review and recommendation. 5• All applicable ordinances shall be complied with. 6. Easements shall be dedicated as required by the City. All voted in favor.. A.J. ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing concerning the application of Tri -Land Co., Inc., Bradley Swenson, for preliminary plat for A. J. Addition, consisting of approximately one acre containing 3 single family lots on County Road 026 and Egan Avenue was next opened by the Chairman. Mr. Runkle presented the appli- cation on behalf of the staff and stated that he understood that Lots 2 and 3 have consent from the Dakota County Highway Department for access to Lone Oak Road. Staff would recommend a single common access to Lone Oak Road. Brad Swenson appeared for the applicant and a number of objecting neighboring owners also appeared. One owner across the street indicated that he under- stood that he could not get access to Lone Oak Road and therefore did not do so when he built his home. Chuck Maloney of Country Home Heights Addition stated that it was his opinion that 48 feet by 330 feet of the Country Home Heights Addition was excluded from the application. It was noted, however, that a portion of Lot 8 was included in the applicant's land area. There were also objections that the protective covenants would not allow for a split of lot and Mr. Swenson stated that it was his understanding that the covenants j - have now expired. Drainage issues, possible lack of parking, the fact that the other lots in Country Home Heights Addition are large lots and the neigh- bor directly to the north indicated he was assured that there would only be APC Minutes August 23, 1983 one house on the lot, were some objections that were raised. There was also an objection to the staff's recommendation that credit for the extra cost of boring under Lone Oak Road for utility access be given, but it was noted this was recommended because of the distance required for access purposes. Also, there will be a median on Lone Oak Road, which would permit only right turn in and out. Mr. Swenson stated that in 1969 the owner of the land gave one-half acre to the County in exchange for access and a culvert to Lone Oak Road and it was also noted that Lot 8 had been split at an earlier time, and thus the reason for including it in the proposed A. J. Addition. After considerable discus- sion, Hall moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend denial of the applica- tion for reasons that were expressed by the neighbors, including the following: I. That the covenants appear to prohibit the split of a lot for con- structibn of more than one building for each platted lot in Country Home Heights Addition. 2. There is uncertainty as to whether the access to Lone Oak Road is permitted, but in any event, extreme safety problems would clearly be created by direct access to Lone Oak Road. 3. There is inadequate parking with potential parking on Lone Oak Road and ,also on Egan Avenue. 4. Further, all reasons cited in the discussion portion above. All voted in favor. GONYEA COMPANY - BEAD D' RUE DRIVE ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The hearing regarding the application of Gonyea Company and Dennis D. Gonyea for preliminary plat approval for proposed Beau D' Rue Drive Addition was brought before the Planning Commission. Mr. Runkle discussed the applica- tion and stated that no other specific uses are planned other than two existing buildings, but noted that two larger buildings are proposed on the property. Mike Gair, Planner, appeared for the applicant and explained the proposal in detail. He stated that he generally agreed with staff's recommen- dations, but that the applicant would prefer to avoid the requirement for common parking. The actual uses of the property are uncertain and the size of the buildings has not been determined. A number of neighboring property owners were present and stated that the soil is very unstable and therefore additional grading and retaining walls may not be desirable in the area. Mr. Krob had concerns about storm drainage and proposed that a storm sewer project be installed to provide for the drainage. Specific parking plans will be provided in the future as the development takes place. A number of neighbor- ing property owners were present and expressed• concerns about the proposal and also objected to the current condition of the buildings on the parcel. Wold moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following conditions: 7 1 APC Minutes August 23, 1983 1. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff at the time of building permit applica- tion. 2. The applicant shall connect some of the back parking areas together in order to allow better traffic circulation in the rear of the buildings. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff, and a landscape bond shall be submitted for an amount approved by the staff and not released until one year after the landscaping has been com- pleted. 4. The parking area shall be surfaced and concrete curbing shall be provided around the perimeter of the parking area. 5. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's comments and recommendations and park dedication requirements shall be met. 6. The plan shall be subject to all other City Code requirements. 7. If installed privately, plans and specifications for utility services shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted to the Engineering Department for approval. 8. Internal driveways shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 9. A 40 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Beau D' Rue Drive. 10. Easements shall be dedicated according to recommendations of the staff. 11. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessment at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 12. All other improvements shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 13. A storm sewer outlet shall be installed to the staffs specifica- tions, in the southeast area of the plat to accommodate drainage. All voted in favor. APC Minutes August 23, 1983 re U. S. HOMES CORPORATION - RIDGECLIFFE ADDITIONS REZONING - WAIVER OF PLAT - PRELIMINARY PLATS The hearings regarding the applications of U. S. Homes - Orrin Thompson Homes for rezoning, waiver of plat and approval of two preliminary plats for Ridgecliffe 6th and 7th Additions was convened by the Chairman. Mr. Runkle introduced the applications: A. Ridgecliffe 6th Addition - Preliminary Plat. An application for preliminary plat approval of Ridgecliffe 6th Addition consisting of 3.3 acres and containing 8 single family lots, located on Outlot D, Ridgecliffe 1st Addition, and parts of Outlots A and B, Park Ridge Addition, was presented. It was noted that this was simply an extension of the Park Ridge Addition plat and there Were no objections to the application. It was noted that Lot 5 is under 12,000 square feet. Hall moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: I. Lot 5 shall include a minimum of 12,000 square feet area. 2. Detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plans shall be sub- mitted and approved by City staff. 3. All City ordinances shall be adhered to. 4. A Development Agreement shall be entered into and executed by the City and the Developer. 5. All easements shall be dedicated to the City as requested by City staff. 6. The water main shall be looped in accordance with engineering requirements. 7. No variances shall be allowed except for topographic or vegetation reasons. All voted yea. B. Ridgecliffe 7th Addition - Preliminary Plat. The next application proposed would be a revision to small single family lots, providing for Lots 1 through 12, Block 1, Ridgecliffe 4th Addition to be platted into Ridgecliffe 7th Addition. The application also was for R-1 Planned Development to allow deviation and a reduction in the overall density. Bill Fierke was present on behalf of the applicant, as was Chuck Winden, Surveyor. Each house would have E APC Minutes August 23, 1983 an entire use of one side yard, and there would also be small front and back yards. The largest home would sell for about $100,000.00 and the zero lot line concept would be implemented. Some private easements would be set up and the City could also acquire easements along the lot lines. The President of Ridgecliffe Association and other residents in the area were present and objected to certain aspects of the application. The President stated that he had not gotten advanced notification, that there were covenants that the Association members were concerned about, and objected to ten houses, where only six lots were now provided. Architectural control was an important issue for the Association. Krob moved, Wold seconded the motion to continue the application concerning the 7th Addition until the next meeting to allow con- sultation between the developer and the Townhouse Association Board. All voted yes. C. Rezoning from R-2 to R-1 PD and Waiver of Plat for Lots 22 and 23' Block 9_ and Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 10, Ridgecliffe 1st Addition. The proposed rezoning was from R-2 to R-1 PD for two duplex lots to contain five single family parcels. There were no objections to the application. Wold was concerned about the size of the lots and the architectural controls which he felt were more important with smaller lots. It was noted there was a swamp on the east side, north of Karis Way, and a berm was intended to be installed along Calaxie Avenue. Krob moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application for rezoning and waiver of plat to shift lots lines, subject to the following conditions: 1. The lot line for Lot 15, Block 10 will be cooed to provide for a minimum 60 foot front yard width. 2. The exhibits showing the three proposed house pads be included in the Development Agreement and there be assurance of architectural conformity. 3. A Planned Development Agreement shall be prepared and signed covering all necessary City conditions as recommended by staff. All voted affirmatively. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by McCrea, seconded Krob, it was resolved that the meeting adjourn at 11:55 p.m. All voted yea. PHH Secretary 10