10/07/1983 - City Council SpecialMEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1983
SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING & INFORMATIONAL
A reminder that a special City Council meeting is scheduled for
Tuesday, October 11, 1983, beginning at 6:00 p.m. The first item
of business will be brief 5-7 minutes of cable commission candi-
dates. There are 8 persons who have submitted interest by submit-
ting a letter. Those letters are attached on pages through
for your review. There are also 3 persons who se ved on the
previous commission who have expressed interest in being appointed
to the new commission which is designed to provide the administra-
tion for the new cable communications system. As a reminder, the
first joint cooperative agreement that was executed under the joint
powers statute for Burnsville and Eagan provided a commission to
explore and jointly franchise cable communications for the two com-
munities. Now that franchising has occurred, that commission is
abolished by its mere action of recommending franchising to the
two City Councils. The new commission will be fulfilling a dif-
ferent purpose which is administration of the new cable communica-
tions system and will be ongoing through the length of the franchise
agreement. The City Council will be appointing four members to
the commission, referenced as directors, two of which will serve
a two year term and two of which will serve a one year term and
then eventually all directors will serve two year terms on a stag-
gered basis. There will also be the appointment of one alternate
and that term is for one year. The joint agreement specifically
states that the Council of each member city shall appoint by resolu-
tion it four directors, one of whom may be a member of the Council
and the other 3 shall be residents of the member. Therefore, the
City Council may appoint a member of the City Council such as City
Councilmember Smith was the City Council representative on the pre-
vious commission. The City Administrator has not received the final
joint cooperative agreement establishing the commission for adminis-
tration of the cable communications system. Therefore, documents
are not available for distribution to the City Council. City Coun-
cilmember Smith is very familiar with the document and can provide
certain briefing to the City Council if an applicant was to ask
a question that pertains to the structure or organization of the
new commission.
At 7:00 p.m., the City Council will be considering some assessment
appeals and that information is enclosed in a memorandum prepared
by the Director of Public Works enclosed on pages 14. through
The City Attorney and Director of Public Works ill handle
this portion of the City Council meeting as staff members.
City Council Meeting Memo
October 11, 1983 Meeting
Page Two
INFORMATIVE
Sperry Noise Complaint
The City Administrator has sent a letter to Mr. Tom Nikolai and
Gerry Tank discussing concerns that were expressed at the last regu-
lar City Council meeting, as it relates to noise, lighting and other
items that were brought before the City Council. A copy of that
letter is attached for your review.
Building Permit Surcharge Rebate
I thought it would be interesting for the City Council to learn
that the City has .received a building permit surcharge rebate in
the amount of $19,472.39.
September Monthly Protective Inspections Report
Attached is a copy of the September Protective Inspections monthly
report.
Roger Franke and Jo VanOverbeke
Jo VanOverbeke is doing fine, having fully recovered from her sur-
gery and has sent a thank you card to be shared with the City Coun-
cil. Also, for the sake of combining a copy, an article appeared
in the October 5 Minneapolis Tribune that Roger Franke has resigned
from Group W and was appointed the cable administrator for the North
Suburban Cable Communications Commission. A copy of this article
and Jo's thank you card are enclosed for your information.
kwwwwi
Mayor Blomquist attended the Board of Directors meeting for the
AMM last evening and learned that the City of White Bear Lake has
dropped its membership from AMM due to the inability of the associa-
tion to formulate a joint and cohesive approach regarding local
government aid. A copy of that letter is attached for your informa-
tion. Also attached -is a copy of an Action Alert by the Metropoli-
tan Council stating that the property tax portion of the 1984 budget
was reduced. The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities should
be thanked for providing pressure to the Metropolitan Council as
representative of all its member cities to reduce their budget.
M
City Council Meeting Memo
October 11, 1983 Meeting
Page Three
Finance Committee
The Finance Committee met this past Wednesday in the conference
room of the Eagan Police Department building to discuss tax incre-
ment financing and the reasons for designating a housing and rede-
velopment authority. The meeting was a marked success in terms
of gathering information and having the ability to brainstorm and
learn the aspects of tax increment financing and the reasons for
recommending a housing and redevelopment authority. Dave Kennedy
of the LeFevere Lefler law firm and Wayne Berggraff of Evanson Dodge
will be retained by the City of Eagan as special legal counsel and
fiscal consultant respectively on the tax increment issue. The
City Administrator will be looking for final ratification of those
consultant appointments at the October 18 meeting. The finance
committee is exploring, gathering information and providing direc-
tion to the consultants at this time on a number of issues such
as what constitutes a development district for tax increment finan-
cing, how will the tax increment financing issue benefit the City
of Eagan, what is the role of the HRA, can there be a port authori-
ty used in our community with this issue and many other related
questions. The next meeting of the Finance Committee is scheduled
for noon Thursday, October 20, at which time the committee will
ask for information that can be compiled into a report specifically
on the HRA for review by the City Council in preparation for the
public hearing on October 27.
Clerical Unit Ratification
Following work yesteray, the Clerical Unit ratified the 1983-84
contract in agreement with the final proposal by the City Council.
Final ratification will be, scheduled for City Council action at
the October 18 meeting.
ICMA Conference
The City Administrator will be in Kansas City for the most part
of next week. If there are any matters that need City Council at-
tention, feel free to contact Holly or Tom Colbert who will be in
charge in my absence.
City Administrator
TLH/hnd
73
- Dear Mr. Hedges; _
I am a resident of Eagan and would be very much interested
in serving on the Burnsville -Eagan Cable Communications
Commission. Even though I have never had any experience
of servingthis
on type of board before, being a fairly
new resident of Eagen, I want to become involved with affairs
of the community.
_. I am not sure what information you may be interested in
_-- - concerning my background, but I can be reached at the above
address or by calling 921-1300 during working hours.
"- Thankyou for consideration on the commission.
:•:':.',"__, Sincerely,
(Kent W. Sorenson
...:.,::,aic•: ..:
kws
6 iZ333
Tom Hedges
Eagan City Administrator
,Mr. Hedges,
I am interested in helping serve the residents of Eagan by serving on the
Burnsville -Eagan Cable Communications Commission.
I moved to Eagan 21-2 years ago after living in New Brighton. My,employer for
the last 4'2 years has been Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company. My job
as a Commercial Lines Underwriter involves selection and pricing of business
insurance.
My college education was at Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa where I graduated
in 1979 with a major in Marketing and a minor in Statistics. I have been
continuing my education with the Chartered Property and Casualty Underwriters
program which I should complete in June 1984.
Please feel free to contact me at 925-4100 during business hours. I will be
out of town on a business trip from October 13-29 so I will not be able to
attend the October 18 City Council meeting.
Thank you for your consideration and I hope to be hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
"Lr
Neil F. Machen
4673 Jackstone Point
Eagan, MN 55122
S_
a4 -
�ec l.; LL
7 ✓ Ae Z(iLCl� M UV!'L1LL��(Y,
17
Ile
'Z
tH .Cr." ✓ Cr"Lc�G (.,'%��"-ce�v DiQ.�� �Ke G�L�cifl.��.a•GC�
✓ti`C�P/7 _ 023_ c<tea LQ
.106t�
wt�
�.�-
��
P-6 1,
� .
/ 4c
c•LruLL^C.�icC
&,
6
pjjc
3111 Farnum Drive
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
October 6, 1983
Tom Hedges
Eagan City Administrator
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
I am writing to express my interest in being considered
for a position on the Burnsville -Eagan Cable Communications
Commission. I understand that the purpose of the Commission
is to coordinate the administration and enforcement of the
recently -adopted franchise agreement.
I have enlcosed a copy of my resume, which lists my
experience as an attorney and my outside interests. I have
had past experience in community activities, and I understand
the way organizations of this type function. I believe that
I can bring a unique perspective to the Commission, based
upon my experience as an attorney and my involvement in
community issues.
I have lived in Eagan for about one year, am married,
and have a 3 -month-old daughter. As a concerned individual
and father, I have a vital stake in the future of television
in our community. I would appreciate your full consideration
for this position. Thank you.
7
STUART DAVID GIBSON
3111 Farnum Drive Birthdate: March 8, 1951
Eagan, MN 55121 Height: 5'10"
612/454-2285 (home) Weight: 165 lbs.
612/725-7474 (office) Marital Status: Married
EDUCATION
Juris Doctor, Cum Laude -- University of Minnesota Law School
June 11, 1976. Grades: (16 -point scale) 13.305, Top 25% of Class
Authored Article, "Comprehensive Models for Assessing
Lost Profits to Antitrust Plaintiffs," 60 Minnesota
Law Review 1233 (1976);
Appellate Advocacy Instructor, 1975-76;
National Moot Court Competition, 1975;
Antitrust Seminar with Minnesota Attorney General, 1975;
Law School Council.
Bachelor of Science in Journalism -- Northwestern University
June 16, 1973. Grades: (4 -point scale) 3.07.
Major: Advertising Minor: Economics
Intramural Athletics
Marching Band
EMPLOYMENT
Senior Trial Attorney -- Internal Revenue Service, Office of
District Counsel, Boston, Massachusetts and St. Paul, Minnesota.
Since May 9, 1977.
Tax Court Litigation: Settled over 95% of Tax Court
cases before trial. Successful in nearly all cases
tried in U.S. Tax Court.
Criminal Tax: Highest inventory of criminal tax cases
in St. Paul Office. Frequent assistance to U.S.
Attorney's Office in prosecuting tax crimes.
General Litigation: Expert on enforcement and defenses to
I.R.S. summonses and on disclosure of tax information.
Have represented I.R.S. agents under subpoena.
Attorney and Law Clerk -- William E. Mullin, formerly of Mullin,
Weinberg & Daly, P.A. 1976 and 1977.
Assisted in litigation involving antitrust and civil
rights matters.
Law Clerk (during law school)
University of Minnesota Law School, Appellate Advocacy
Instructor. 1975-76.
Analytics, Inc. Law Clerk for economic consulting firm,
specializing in antitrust cases. 1975-76.
Minnesota Department of Commerce, Legal Assistant to
Assistant Attorney General in Securities Division. 1974-75.
no
STUART D. GIBSON
EMPLOYMENT-RELATED ACTIVITIES
Instructor•
Expert Witness Training Program, St. Paul, 1981.
Indirect Methods of Proof Training Program, St. Paul, 1981.
Continuing Professional Education for Revenue Agents,
Fargo, 1982.
Continuing Professional Education for Special Agents,
St. Paul, 1982.
Participant•
Criminal Tax Training Program, St. Paul, 1977.
General Litigation Training Program, Boston, 1978.
Trial Attorney Training Program, Chicago, 1980.
Technical Conference, Dayton, 1981.
Midwest Regional Conference, Kansas City, 1982.
OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES
Alumni Admissions Council, Northwestern University.
Volunteer Attorney Panel, Southern Minnesota Regional Legal
Services, Inc., St. Paul
Treasurer and Board of Directors, Midland Grove Condominium
Association, Roseville.
Community Advisory Board, KSJN Radio, St. Paul
ORGANIZATIONS
Minnesota State Bar Association
Ramsey County Bar Association
Minnesota Civil Liberties Union
ADMITTED TO PRACTICE
Minnesota Supreme Court: October 1, 1976.
United States District Court, District of Minnesota:
December 6, 1976.
United States Tax Court: August 4, 1978.
REFERENCES
Hon. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass Carol Grant, Esq.
Judge of Muncipal Court Meshbesher, Singer & Spence
Hennepin County Government Ctr. 1616 Park Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55487 Minneapolis, MN 55404
612/348-4740 612/339-9121
Professor Leo Raskind
University of Minnesota
School of Law
Minneapolis, MN 55455
612/373-2851
Hart Kuller, Esq.
Winthrop, Weinstine & Sexton
1800 Conwed Tower
St. Paul, MN 55101
612/292-8110
��716,9 1J T E ISE
September 26th, 1983
Tom Hedges
EAGAN CITY ADMINISTRATOR
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, 11n. 55122
Dear Sir:
I would like to be considered for a position on the Burnsville -
Eagan Cable Communications Commission. .
As a resident of Eagan, I have followed, with interest, the development
of cable service to our two communities. I have attended several City
Council meetings, but could not become involved with the early committee
because of my business committments.
At this point, I can bring to the new commission, twenty four years
experience in broadcast, educational and corporate television. I am
Vice President and a co-founder of Computer Video Productions, Inc.,
a Bloomington based teleproduction facility.
The business base of Computer Video covers both local as well an national
companies, with interests in all levels of television production, including
interactive videotape and videodisc.
I have, in the recent past, consulted on production capabilities proposed
in Cable company franchise applications. Most recently for the Southwest
twin cities suburbs and Two Rivers, Wisconsin.
I look forward to talking with you concerning the commission appointments.
Please contact me if you require additional information or references.
My business and home numbers are listed below„
Best
Regards,
pv /. .
Dean N. Sutliff /
Business : 888-2388
Home: 452-6897 1765 Gabbro Trail Eagan, Mn. 55122
/0
1317 Clover Dr. S., All 1-35W A 494, Minneapolis. Minnesota 55420 • (612) 888-2388
ROGER G. FLING
3998 Riverton Avenue
Eagan, MN 55122
(612) 454-2291
September 30, 1983
Mr. Tom Hedges
Eagan City Administrator
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minn. 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges,
I wish to submit my name for possible consideration as
a member of the Burnsville -Eagan Cable Communications
Commission.
I have been a home owner in Eagan for approximately eleven
years and a businessman within the greater metropolitan
area for the last twenty five years.
While my experience is somewhat limited in this area, I
do have a great deal of experience in telephone and computer
communications systems.
I also feel that my lack of experience in Cable communications
may be overcome by the enthusiasm that I will bring to this
very important commission.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sin rely,
'7i>
oger G. Flin
October 3, 1983
Mr. Tom Hedges
City Administrator
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Mn. 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
This is my letter of application for a position on the Burnsville -
Eagan Cable Communication Commission.
My wife Donna and I have lived at 1253 Carlson Lake Lane, Eagan for
the past 5 years and consequently satisfy the residency requirement.
My background includes 20 years of electronics, data communication
and data processing experience. I believe that this background
would be invaluable in understanding issues and opportunities arising
from the implementation and operation of a cable television service.
My desire to serve on this commission stems from my interest in the
many opportunities that this technology brings to the home. My part-
icipation on the commission will be to help ensure that the im-
plementation and operation of the cable television service is mon-
itored for quality and reliable service. I will look forward to
assisting the commission in the evaluation of future enhancement and
expansion of the cable service also.
If there should be any questions regarding my application I can be
reached at home phone 452-7364 or business phone 341-6321.
Si cerely,
Raymond L. Stevens
13
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR COLBERT
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1983
SUBJECT: INFORMATION FOR OCTOBER 11, 1983 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
As the Council may recall, .during the final assessment hearing for
the following projects, written objections were submitted by' the
affected property owners and subsequently followed up with formal
appeals certified with the clerk of district court. Subsequently,
the City Council continued the public hearing for these affected
parcels to a later date to follow the required procedure of evalua-
ting special benefit to the parcel installed in relationship to
the amount of the assessment proposed to be levied.
Therefore, October 11 was established for a meeting of the City
Council as a whole to evaluate the benefits in each of the following
parcels._ This meeting will be conducted by the City Attorney and
will be providing testimony from the consulting engineer, Public
Works Director/City Engineer and the appraisers retained to evaluate
the benefit for each of the parcels involved. Since this is a con-
tinuation of a formal public hearing, public hearing procedure will
be followed.
PROJECT 297R, BLACKHAWK LAKE TRUNK STORM SEWER
HORNE & HORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
The original public hearing for this project was held on May 20,
1980 with the final assessment hearing being scheduled for July
20, 1982 at which time Mr. Horne submitted written objections per-
taining to the proposed assessments. Subsequently, the City Council
has continued this public hearing for the final assessments several
times to allow Mr. Horne and the City staff to work out a mutual
agreement pertaining to the resolution of this trunk storm sewer
assessment. Although Mr. Horne has verbally agreed to the execution
of such an agreement, staff has been unable to obtain his signature
on this agreement. Therefore, it is the staff's recommendation
that we proceed with the formal public hearing pertaining to special
benefit relating to the final assessments as originally intended.
At the final assessment hearing on October 11, City staff will be
presenting documentation pertaining to the topographic layout of
Mr. Horne's property and its relationship and benefit received from
this project. Information is enclosed on pages through Zp .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve the final assessment roll for Project 297R against Par-
cel #10-02100-010-01 and all of King's Wood Addition except Lot
11 and authorize the certification to the County Auditor for col-
lection.
Public Works Director Memo
October 11, 1983 Special City Council Meeting
Page Two
PROJECT 182R, T.H. 55 STORM SEWER OUTLET
STANLEY PIEKARSKI
On November 18, 1980, the public hearing was held for the installa-
tion of a trunk storm sewer outlet from the ponds located on T.H.
55 north of the Burr View Acres Addition. Upon completion of the
project, the final assessment hearing was held on July 5, 1983 at
which time Mr. Piekarski submitted a written objection followed
by a notice of appeal to district court pertaining to his proposed
assessments in the amount of $11,272 based on a net assessable area
of 8.62 acres at $561 per acre after applying a 20% credit to the
gross area of 10.32 acres. (Pagan Z th rough '2 )
Mr. Piekarski claims that there is no benefit derived from the in-
stallation of this trunk storm sewer and that he should not be as-
sessed for the. project. Enclosed on page _21 is a copy of the
minutes from the April meeting of 1976 wherein Mr. Piekarski ori-
ginally petioned the City for the installation of this project to
alleviate his property from flooding. Staff will also be presenting
pictures taken the spring of 1980 wherein again is shown Mr.
Piekarski's property flooding due to lack of this storm sewer pro-
ject. In addition, City staff will be presenting topographic lay-
outs of his property to help determine and show the benefit received
from this project. Enclosed on page is a location map of
Mr. Piekarski's property in relationship to the ponds controlled
by this storm sewer project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve the final assessments for Project 182R against Parcel
#10-03800-080-02 and authorize the certification to the County Audi-
tor for collection.
PROJECT 240, DREXEL HEIGHTS STREETS
PILOT KNOB PROPERTIES
The original final assessment hearing was held in September of 1980
and subsequently revised on December 16, 1980 to incorporate the
additional costs incurred by the City to fulfill the developer's
responsibility relating to subdivision and platting within the City.
Subsequent to the December 1980 final assessment hearing, Pilot
Knob Properties submitted written objections and followed through
with an appeal to district court of the assessments levied. Through
court proceedings, district court determined that the City did not
follow the proper procedure in determining benefit to the property
in question. Therefore, the City Attorney is recommending that
we proceed with this new final assessment hearing to discuss the
benefit received from the improvements installed in relationship
to the assessment in the amount of $4,467.50 per lot for the 24
I JI
Public Works Director Memo
October 11, 1983 Special City Council Meeting
Page Three
lots within the Drexel Heights subdivision. There is no additional
information that can be provided at this time that has not already
been presented at several previous hearings. Enclosed on page
is a copy of the Drexel Heights subdivision for Council's reference.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON .THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
for Project 240 and approve the assessments in the amount of
$4,467.50 per lot to all 24 lots within the Drexel Heights subdivi-
sion and authorize the staff to certify the assessments to the Coun-
ty Auditor for collection.
16
SAC 8/30/82
B. PROJECT 297, BLAC HAWK LAKE OUTLET - ASSESSMENT OBJECTION
i
6. James and Arvella Horne (Parcel No. 10-02100-010-01 and King's Wood Addition
Horn,- D] uv lnn nr rnV rAi-inn e..� r,.
BACKGROU m IIm'ORNF noN
Enclosed on Page 9 / is a copy of the written notice of objection that was sub-
mitted by Mr. Horne at the final assessment hearing held on July 20, 1982. En-
closed on Page Jag- is a referenced location map showing the relationship of these
parcels to the overall assessment area for Project 297. Mr. Horne's first objec-
tion pertains to a procedural requirement pertaining to notification of public
hearing for the project which was held on May 20, 1980. This contention is correct
in that these parcels were inadvertently omitted from the official individual par-
cel notification for that public hearing. However, formal notices were published
in the legal newspapers and this area is, in fact, included within the proposed
and designated area assessment for Project 297.
Their second objection, pertains to trunk area storm sewer assessments against pro -
pe 'y that "can contain its present and future water drainage". Enclosed on Page
33 is the location of this property in relationship to the drainage basin and
ex sting storm sewer facilities that presently service this property. The present
pond (JP -5) that is contained within portions of Mr. Horne's and Horne Development
Corporation's property presently has a positive storm sewer gravity outlet provi-
ding direct drainage into Blackhawk lake. The gross acreage of parcel 10-02100-
010-01 is 27.59 acres. 7/10 of an acre was deducted for the existing pond (JP -5)
and a 20% credit was applied for potential future right-of-way and easement dedi-
cations. This resulted in a net assessable area of 21.51 acres (936,975 square
feet) which was assessed at the agricultural rate of 3.4C per square foot. This
resulted in an assessment figure of $31,857.17. All lots within the King's Wood
Addition were assessed at the single family/agricultural rate based on their ac-
tual square footage. These assessments ranged from $442.00 per lot to a maximum
of $3,213.00 per lot for Outlot 3 (2.17 acres).
If Mr. Horne will not agree to a waiver of the procedural requirement of individual
public hearing notification, the City should pursue a new public hearing process:
with a new final assessment hearing. However, because the property owned by Mr.
Horne, or Horne Development Corporation, lies within the drainage basins benefited
by the Blackhawk lake Outlet and due to the fact that the pond lying within this
property (JP -5) has a positive storm sewer gravity outlet into Blackhawk lake,
the staff feels that the assessments should remain as determined and presented at
the final assessment hearing held on July 20, 1982.
conlalns
Doti e .-��,�� p pI� �zw �• C�.
17
PK'_
PRa7I- 297 — AssmsET AREA
Ll
WO
`_ •`` ~�'/ ;SC
C a�l.. LI
INCUS IAL\le PARI(\\ A
is CEW
� A
R-4
Ll 41
CB -L R R LA
G.GBS p
LI • • i%/'�,`��\ "CSC 4\ ` `'t-'.2opie�-.r s �L�--�C �`: A
SCSC PF
rRr• `t A :/ A R•4 r• a` I.� _.?�" �� A � - R•I '/
LI LBP.;r----.', :7r-v.O` • r - r!, -.UC SE
.�-��5wq �+2P.T _ i. 'I -T3` 1 R•I ,t `i :.i' _ '�' `�I /
PF L
.: A _' < PELaeu•Ir.+=.:O C- r, R•L ! I� -_
[III `��y • '--�TiiT PC xIV1•NO°LE I A
Y
•�• GB �B•��I. ['EN _ a��4 i l A a R.3 r.
.%: PF - II PK,' ... r C/ I RB �I
II B rd R._. _.^i.. pF `Ti r: L e s • n I I
MBaPo w .,
_Z.
5c.00L i ` o. ---, `l,R C a , i i7.A° A\\o c 1 n.c r'-",� - :.i ..u•Gs:
R-4
_u.IN�,. FFA• :IL' \��. I ...^ A N 0-4
PK I'= :II r�'- 'y `tnawas / _.PiL-.
.1 {�'� .:. �•, t'=Li�,�� i '-f``' R-4
'�.11: .I .L1 :Clx Rar l�� [; .A dL rlwa: •,. � xElGxi vTI�—J�..v.
OK
�d w
Y•RI •� /i C ^ R 4 i,
-R-4
R I
CSC rrf •�� '�at,
`[•,,elv�-• �Aq.\C 9� Ynl[al, �, P. ip C5C 1 ^-iKu. 1� �'-rL't " R 11\ KZI_IIlal ' ' W it �cI=an ri NLJA'A
I', ; II'!B� ..I _ RrvCR RB i A A ;\- A A14 -vq_3—.
Z`\ ��1 I LR A �TEsr
PF_'� wrtR 1! �. ��_ (� 5. Fllr RI
/J( A ,1 . Rs LB `J� �I R-2 , u `t�%i1 ,n F� >< ^a -1r r ` R•1
.. _..- r NK:C}L� . .ai IEIl__ Ij%C R I -'�` r•°
awL[Arr•Cv50^.1I —- R•3
A � � GO'riSv Iota,
Imo ---'r rte`/ =' \•\'.�: f• r±'; \ %� ?;r.
PK
eJPK
R-� 1 \ .%•F i � - ,5 . 1 .4 ' , r, ,_ R- .:iy 4�.L� lr �
A 1' .•%i'.. A '•fir' i. sj'4r'oi�].4.t�{T'.-9a�. .,' `��I Gw�'), r -
i "s f " , L^+.+.^ � t� 1 f ,•rf� .'I .-^1 J i' r , y r ,.
rLr• !r Yt ' r:.- r . 1,.1, � � � ..rte .. i' PIC f'. Zr
., lr. ✓, ... �.. ,,.-..t�y:.�;'�,�\. ar.�-f�Y,J,. .: i�t4,r ��M.
RIA 4 I I G+• ,• II
/f/? P � �—
--- -`
-14\
1; j I '' ',�• !i/` D-19
�. •.�-,tom -- L_ f 'LENAr:s Io 121
/• /J,- \ C -Is )r•': i:rV'J us POST__ .I.
—J\ ; ` rarygr r �/ SERV -CE -=_E-
D-
-I•awiNn4%/•T-� \ C_IB �,:�p"16,5 ./ D-13
/:- I 1
I `.�,-- N
_-I l r . ETERE cJi / n AL2 .
y. •:! i/ /.n,�. ., ��r., y16_Ii—f z�_-Z
I I
./ r.
,,y+`'/ .:r '' (,i F,, rror 19 , iC"17 \ �I
C-2�
C-5
C_T�-i-�,,, n�ocE FC -19' ( y-�5 � f -20
r�Y //— n.rrt�
/� C-6 /.. �C, 'I '.r--�•. ice+==1'�:.�; _J
`C 3 /^ C-10 rrs IC�3 1-7
_7 ''V','
/ ! , }Oc Isr 2N0 ',._��, •/ 'I D•19 � iD-23
`F ^
tAL AR
/
l
;� - - rte. �i<r - •�1 I /
-
�r 4
�. �A•B A 9 // c -•LAKE ��._✓- \;
•%7 OPS Y _ _
'Ul it\Yt/4J<O=�iQ� _ l-ti/�/1�•;� ... -
;'; :AES -, �' a; lKc -.,!_ 6.40' r / \ } i+J-IS
I -�•, /\J-62\
J-62 f
57
•_i::•�_ •-urs[--<NOA-LE �•',/ 8-34 1 /�/�•�-7 -'� ` ���." �.' ^I'\�
?4
/21� , 'i�J ,•' CJ-6~..J�--�.'-�,f�
1 r s.
A23 \.i' i 8-35
1 g_3X1B-36
"' I•• /A_35 �/I e/ al _ I'.. 'v�-3VLv L_7 k/ li
" B 9 II
V-2 (� J-65'
J r / _2 'B
I i B•7' / ' u Jf�L
8-24. 8-23`10
.. ).vmn •,,r;,'.Ln _
�r - ,, 71 -'JC�.F ;:i�-•�-1,..,`ti x:.,113
/�A'13
v
-33 ' .�/A-3a 9.27.: 1.• ••.. �, B - r
„ • , f"... • ..\ l ^_ _ .
\ A�/ i� J .: 5.28�/�y ,�.9-la ate. •`. ��1 ..r- Ift
4
�:
r.r\/8:I Bc15 -•�. `�4':� r �� �o•?is�,•�r�.:•..'�
- - �. _'_ 8_3-~�`-'Z��51 _Rn�.�_ �IL u� _ i r�B116 I,1�\_c ��••-, `'\�,'-.._ :•l ���ttii=�
8-22 —/�'� �i-r•� T'-'i—�'Ti��-T ..��: •�'
A-34
` }h� , I • I .. v .j
'�`��/ r ••L-qn ,.�., ,� 1 8-20
and no backing onto either service road adjacent to Country Club or Highway #13;
further that there would be no more than two driveway access locations to the
parcel.
SPECIAL PERIfIT FEES. Upon motion by Smith, seconded Rahn, all members votin',
yes, it was RESOLVED to authorize a fee schedule for special permits under
Ordinance #52 consisting, of $50 for the original permit and $25 for annual re-
newals.
BURR OAR AREA DRAINAGE. Mr. Stan Pikarsky appeared and reported serious
drainage problems on his property immediately North of Highway #155 in the Burr
Oak area created flooding on his land. He requested that a study be prepared for
storm sewer to provide for outflow to the Burr Oak Lake to the South. Rahn moved
and Smith seconded a motion to authorize the City Engineer to prepare a prelimi-
nary report and to report back to the City Council.
PROJECT #174 - CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PABX STORII SEWER. The City Engineer indicated
that there was no final response from the MCC concerning its request for contri-
bution for tha installation of a proposed storm sewer near Commanche Road. Wachter
moved and Rydrych seconded the motion that the City Council take no action on
Project #174 until an affirmative response is received from the NRICC concerning
contribution for the cost of the projects, and that the final decision in the
matter be tabled until such time.
PROTECT #1uS - SIBL EY TERNIMAL ii.,^,USTRIAL P:\ I: STO a SMIER PROJSCT. The City
Engineer recommended that Phase 1 of the project, consisting of a trunk to the
railroad tract: and a subtrunk to the rear of the 'Murphy Trucking area, be in-
stalled at the present time. He further stated that there has been no answer from
the Minnesota Highway Department concerninn its contribution. Polzin moved and
Rahn seconded the motion to install Phase 1 of Project #168.
A letter from Pre :tuna doors was read objecting to the project and a repre-
sentative from Murphy Trucking appeared and requested an extension of time to
-7- a
JOSEPH PERRY qq
.N�forney at
June 30, 19113
City Cleric
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, 1,1n. 55122
Re: Stanley Piekarski. property. PRL,,r. i Sa
3350 Highway 55
Eagan, 14n. 55121
Dear Clerk:
B03 COMMERCE BUILDING
ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101
222-6896
VJe are filing a written objection pursuant to R'iin-
nesota Law before the assessment hearino on July 5, 1953 at
7:00 p.m. The grounds of our objections are:
1) We have not received any benefits from this, only
additional hardships.
2) That private property .is being used raithout due
compensation.
3) That the
property has been damaged first
by the
highway
department and secondly
by the
city of
Eagan in
the, use of the property
v:ithout
oerrais-
sion, without
compensation, and
contrary
to the
laws and
the constitution of the
State
of Min-
nesota.
4) We believe that any assessmenL for any storm sel:rer
improvement that has be -n contemplated and has actual-
ly completed is illegal and unconstitutional.
ctiycly SI -1141 Lt - re d
torri'ey for �bCi owner.
I ,
Stanley/T. Piekarski.
a2
�b
etQ,� �
STATE OF MINNESOT a0 J
3 r
COUNTY OF DAKOTA Q
Mr. and Mrs. Stanley Piekarski,
Appellants,
VS.
City of Eagan,
Respondents.
DISTRICT COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Now comes the Appellants and alleges the following:
I.
The Appellants own in Joint Tenancy homestead property
located at 350 Highway 55, Eagan, Mn. 55121.
II.
That the Respondents are attempting to illegally procure
an assessment against said real property in the amount of
$11,272.
That at all time the Appellants have conformed with Min-
nesota law and profected their appeal rights and are hereby
appealing to the above Court on the grounds:
1. That said assessments is not a benefit to said prop-
erty, but creates additional hardships.
2. That private property is being used without just corrr-
pensation contrary to law, the state and federal con-
stiution and fairness.
/011 n
3. That the property has been damaged first by the highway
department and secondly by the city of Eagan in the use
of said propery without permission, without conpens-
ation, contrary to the laws and constituiton of the
state and federal law.
4. that the assessment for a storm sewer improvement was
illegal and unconstitutional.
IV.
Wherefore, Appellant prays for a judgment against said
Respondent for the following:
1. For a dissimissal of this assessemnt .against appel
lant's property.
2. For legal fees in preventing this action, and costs and
disbursements incurred herein.
3. For any other remedy the Cour ems just and equit
able. (\
pn yerry
tt rney for App lants
8 Commerce Bldg.
St. Paul, Mn. 55101
222-6896
COUNTY -----STATE----'°'-----AID
—� HIGHWAY — —
0
,r::.-. •; �"\ i � Jit;, M.,9E'.,.: � . -
City of Eagan c
;fir y� i ..r.i Jet (°ii 'r:rgy:�: 3: •3.
I-rl
�l�' 012-00
/9 /b♦ v ' s" :v y.. •a'r I '-A —___S 45.04. •w-•+ o:.
Aff
.G � _r `„ �� i- :r:.l Je5011-00 :r...:+• . 4 ,. ax.li.�h of �t9m _ _° D!�� Nu:5�1:' _
y „p+� •' ,. d s Oi =00 Pm 1 Dow^ City of Eagan
F _ \ =ro o
i<JJ R %�• :h' .�
City of 4.:•>Y-, �it U6w\a' v 020-00
/ Eagan
'r rrs 5;. �� •J b_ ZQ, \A '. �` �d �::.. .( , `\ Ca0. 030-00 -
i� n°i q S;-_ 5 �1 r\;( ��"•+'`, �t r\r�\•� .II Ifi / . �.�saist
td`r L -f
01��-azCity of Eagan
;e o®�' / 010-00 i 1 Tit^
LAK I •O .+ •i';., \ d " . Y I >I le i ° s:EC\ < ,l
HCl!: Pt
1 R 4 _�� oa VV r+`.T 't,.•n �� � C}• +J,.��, ir4.
�: 5:%}. s .030-00
•,1 City of Eagan 1'1
f 1 r+ ® I-
t 4 ,� Via. nDo� 1, . E 1a + e+a a '..''. f r•`x• /� 1 n
N x y I w s ..• I �� �r -r-
ola
8-a2 Pi , O� ° rte• wDR` g f;�a �°
+ _ t.r-r -S f R 3 .
X: r • R } " +Q V'y`. +a• '''1 .,.�.p; p •' !,
a ., Y 'c t' •...; a
1 rn
040_52 ' ji
s 30� t . r. . '
Il •S. N,S_, Q 4d6 — •rY¢nC �'•K9A-- • tt 6'; C
d� � ..F Y Ygg dI" �• o Is � 9 M1 t � � , fI,
September 29, 1983
Chairman of the Board
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
183 University Avenue E.
St. Paul, MN 55101
c/o Vern Peterson
Dear Chairman:
i
v.s
The City Council of White Bear Lake during its budget hearings
this last week voted to withdraw our membership in the Association
of Metropolitan Municipalities. Their decision was the -result of
two concerns. First we'must exnresG our r ncerr�uii;h the ;+
of the Association to formulate a joint cohesJive__apprnarh +., tkie
questionof state unding o ocal government. We believe that
tfie Association; -because of the diversity of its membership, is
paralyzed on these critical issues. Secondly, the City is faced
with tha choice of where to appropriate its available funds for a
lobbying effort which would have the greatest impact. We believe
that those funds would be better spent.with a group of cities
that have common interests and objectives.
I personally appreciate the work that has been done by the
Association in past years and realize the difficult situation
the organization finds itself in due to economic uncertainties
at the state level and the diverse composition of the Association.
On behalf of the White Bear Lake City Council,
BGS:im
ly,
cc: City Council of White Bear Lake
a7
4820 Cook Avenue 9 While Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 9 Phone (612) 429-8526
For Immediate Release:
1984 Work Program
And Budget Approved
For more information
contact the Public
Information Office
612/291-6464
Ken Reddick
291-6422
Friday, '
Sept. 23, 1983
The Metropolitan Council voted Thursday to out the property tax portion of
its 1984 budget by $175,000.
Council Chairman Gerald Isaacs said the action lowers the projected
increase in Council revenue from property tax sources from 8.3 percent to 5.2
percent.
"This is below the average increase of 6.3 percent in municipal budgets
that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities had urged us to meet, and
is a fiscally sound and responsible move on the Council's part," Isaacs said.
The action reduces the amount that must be raised through the agency's
regionwide mill levy from $6.06 million to $5.89 million. The overall 1984
Council budget totals $10.91 million. The Council is authorized by law to levy
up to .267 (8/30ths) of one mill. The reduction means the agency will be
levying .258 mill.
The 1984 Council budget compares with a 1983 budget,,as amended, of $9.96
million. The original 1983 budget was $9.38 million.
In related actions Thursday, the Council cancelled more than $30 million in
property tax levies for sewer and park debt retirement purposes. Resolutions
V
adopted by the Council authorize the use of $31.3 million in the Council's
Sewer Bond Fund and $1.57 million in its Parks and Open Space Fund to pay
principal and interest on outstanding regional sewer and park system bonds.
more
Money in the sewer fund comes from payments from municipalities and from
charges against other users of the regional sewerage system. The park funds
were provided by the Minnesota Legislature to finance the retirement of debt
incurred in connection with acquisition and development of the regional parks
system. If sufficient money is not available to handle the sewer and park
debt payments, the Council is,required by 'law to raise it through the
property tax.
The largest proportion of 1984 Council revenues, 66 percent, will come from
local sources, primarily the property tax. The federal share of the budget, a
rapidly declining source in recent years, is pegged at 30 percent. This
compares with more than 60 percent in 1979. The state share of Council
revenues is less than four percent.
The work program outlined in the budget was described by Isaacs as
"comprehensive and ambitious." Priority items include revision of several
major regional policy plans, including those on growth and development, health,
housing, aviation, solid waste, and parks and open space.
Other activities include preparation of a new regional plan, on economic
development; completion of plans for services to aging people; the beginning of
a comprehensive study of barge fleeting and water transportation; and the first
inventory of all land use in the Region since 1962.
The budget calls for an increase of six people in the Council's staff
complement, raising the total to 217. This is a decrease from 238 in 1980.
-30-
�:
':<���'
.•..
;?;�
�"`i
�S�i'
;y'•.
': .?�a'i
::}'I
:� r
:'� i.�.. .Ci
{p
Franke, a former aide to Govs. Wen-
dell Anderson and Rudy Perplch,
will assume the post Nov. 1. During
three'years at Group W, Franke was
the company's Minnesota franchis-
Ing manager and director of commu-
ally affairs for Its six Twin Cities
cable -television franchise areas.
Franke represented the company
during the 1982 fight for the subur-
ban Ramsey County cable franchise.
Group W, a wholly owned subsidiary
7 of Westinghouse Electric Corp., beat
out Storer Cable and United-Zylstra
Communications Co. for the 15 -year
franchise to bring able television to
Arden Hills, Falco Heights, Lauder-
dale, Little Canada, Mounds View,
New Brighton, North Oaks, Rose-
ville, St. Anthony and Shoreview.
He has continued to represent Group
W . before the commission during
construction of the suburban Ram.
e more expensive dual
cable system the company promised.
Group 'W officials did meet with
commission chairman Tom Curley
Sept: 17 to discuss that, but Curley
rejected the suggestion.
Group W Area Manager Terry Shu-
ster said he was surprised and "most
unhappy" to find Franke's letter. of
resignation on his desk Tuesday
,morning. But hp said they part on.
good terms.
Commission attorney Tom Creighton
said Franke's hiring does not pose
any conflict of interest problems, ei-
ther to the commission or Group W.
"The conflict question was discussed,
certainly. First of all with respect to
his contractual obligations to Group
W there Is .... no problem. And,
'second, from our point of view, we
.felt that his knowledge of the people
In Group W would be to our advan.
tage."
djPcs TR 9 /a -r -e j
Cable official quits to join
overseer: ®f ex -employer' 1
By Paul Gustafson
Staff Writer
sey County system, which Is sched-
.' uled to be completed in May 1984.
A top local official with Group W
His desire .to return tolpublicseclor
Cable resigned late Monday to be-
employment, and the chance to help
come cable administrator for the
North Suburban Cable Communica.
^ oversee the operation of a first -rale
.:cable television'system, led him to
tions Commission, the group that reg-
ulates Group W's sble system in 10
apply for the commission job,
Franke said. '
cities of suburban Ramsey County,
-' .,.°: •'^!
Roger Franke's switch from compa-
Schmidt said that "Roger knows.the
'Inner operations of Group W, and he
ny official to company regulator sur-
knows that franchise agreement :..:
prised Group W officials and delight-
(Group W officials) won't be able to
ed cable commissionmembers,
some of whom view his hiring as a
.: snowball him one bit, and therefore
they won't be able to snowball the
way to ensure that Group W lives up
commission."- Schmidt said he's wor-
to Its franchise obligations.
rled, for example, that the company
'
Franke is "kind of our special insur-
is falling behind Its construction
schedule. r••, -
ance policy" to make sure Group W
I -:, , . ,.
lives up to Its agreement to build "a
Cable commission members became
Cadillac cable system" for the 10
suburbs, said vice chairman Steve
upset last month when they heard
rumors that Group W officials might
Schmidt, a New Brighton council-
"' -. "
approach them with a proposal to
man.
build only a single cable system, to-
stead of th
Franke, a former aide to Govs. Wen-
dell Anderson and Rudy Perplch,
will assume the post Nov. 1. During
three'years at Group W, Franke was
the company's Minnesota franchis-
Ing manager and director of commu-
ally affairs for Its six Twin Cities
cable -television franchise areas.
Franke represented the company
during the 1982 fight for the subur-
ban Ramsey County cable franchise.
Group W, a wholly owned subsidiary
7 of Westinghouse Electric Corp., beat
out Storer Cable and United-Zylstra
Communications Co. for the 15 -year
franchise to bring able television to
Arden Hills, Falco Heights, Lauder-
dale, Little Canada, Mounds View,
New Brighton, North Oaks, Rose-
ville, St. Anthony and Shoreview.
He has continued to represent Group
W . before the commission during
construction of the suburban Ram.
e more expensive dual
cable system the company promised.
Group 'W officials did meet with
commission chairman Tom Curley
Sept: 17 to discuss that, but Curley
rejected the suggestion.
Group W Area Manager Terry Shu-
ster said he was surprised and "most
unhappy" to find Franke's letter. of
resignation on his desk Tuesday
,morning. But hp said they part on.
good terms.
Commission attorney Tom Creighton
said Franke's hiring does not pose
any conflict of interest problems, ei-
ther to the commission or Group W.
"The conflict question was discussed,
certainly. First of all with respect to
his contractual obligations to Group
W there Is .... no problem. And,
'second, from our point of view, we
.felt that his knowledge of the people
In Group W would be to our advan.
tage."
PROTECTIVE r[SPFCTI_O::S
mnNTHLY RPPORT
NUMBER OF PER`:ITS ISSUED
Building
SEPTEMBER, 1983
Year -To -Date
I\S_PECTION/OFFICE HOURS
96
77588
Building
This ?[onth
Year -To -Date
Plumbing
5 300.
1,819.5
Water Softener
153.5
1,169.5
Administrative/Office
79.0
625.5dministrative/OfEicc
Fire Marshal
3g,p
38.0
421.0
Miscellaneous
6
364.5
Ceneral Office
.p
36.5
Perrit Processing
163.5
1,542.0
84,513.25
139.0
1,053.0
NUMBER OF PER`:ITS ISSUED
Building
This ?'onth
Year -To -Date
Electrical
96
77588
Plumbing
760
hVAC
61
617
Water Softener
87
9
512
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
6
31
Signs
Total Fee*
19
Single Family
5
27
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
YTD
MONTPLY
1933
Tvnc
Permits
Valuation
Permit Fce _
Plan Chr_ck
Fee
Total Fee*
397
Single Family
47
$
3,196,000.00
$
15,799.50
$
7,899.75
84,513.25
56
Dl17Ie:{
4
$
214,000.00
$
1,171.00
$
585.50
$ 7,003.50
123
Multi-Family20
$
889,000.00
$
2,989.50
$
1,494.75
$ 27,42S.75
13
Co.-aercial
1
$
87,000.00
$
394.00
$
197.00
$ 1,909.50
2
Industrial
0
0
0
0
p
0
Institutional
0
0
—_—
0
—
0—
p
21
Res. Carne_
5
$
30,500.00
$
258.50
0
$ 304.00
_ 9
Swim. Pool
1
$
6,000.00
$
56.50
0
$ 59.50
154
:lie_ce_llnncous
TOTALS
18
96
$
73,600.00
$
$
744.50
21,443.50
$
52.25
$ 2,794.75
775
$ 4,496,100.00
$ 10,229.25
--
$ 124,313.-5
- YFAP.-TO-DATE. 1953
$50,264,400.00
$222,621.00
$105,361.50
$1,268,715.14
* Total Fees Include: P.uilding Permit Fee, Sur -Charge, Plan C`ieck Fee, SAC Unit Fee,
Water Connection Fee, Water Meter Fee and Road Unit Fee.
33
PRorEC'1'1VIE INSPIECTIONS - ADDITIONAL MON'I'IILY 1NFORI•IATION
SEPTEMBER, 1983
LTI-FAMILY 11AFAKDO1114
ERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL MD INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDO1.3J
1; iIdin_C
Permit :''
MIE11+er of
Number of
Number of
AI•IOUNI'S 01 V
n Check
Scrviee
flan (:I:ecl,
10-03500-010-01
I I'C
PelmitsB11i
Idi TIPS
U11 is
Valuations
Permit FCCS
Charge
FCCS
TOLa] I'CC*
10111' Unit
175,917,50
"OTE: FIVE BELOW LISTED AS "M
SCELLANEOUS" N "NATURE OF 13JILDING
PERMITS
14
Sur -Charge -
$
s
Ic1:111101:50
4
1.
4
$176,000.00
$1,024.00
$ 88.00
$ 512.00
$ 6,764.00
Eight Unit
$ 15.00
*Total Fee -
720 Blue Gentian Rd.
4'arren8473
1'olmhcusc
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i
i
ApirtmcnLs or
$ 74.50
0
$ 79.00
8515
1--.8511--l-3883-Beall
3500 Dodd Rd.
$ 9,000.0074.50
Co. �OO.G
Condominiums
16
1
16
$713,000.00
$1,965.5
.50
$ 982.75
$20,664.75
TO'I'A1.S
'-0
2
20
$889,000.00
$2,989.50
E$444.50
$1,494.75
$27,428.75
ERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL MD INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDO1.3J
1; iIdin_C
Permit :''
--
ddress legal
860 Cliff Road
Ol;ncr Valuations
Dakota
Permit FeeFees
AI•IOUNI'S 01 V
n Check
Total Fccs•
8482
10-03500-010-01
County $87,000.00
$394.00
$33
197.00
$1,909.50
60
Rcs. Garage -
18
Bldg. Permit Fee
- $
175,917,50
"OTE: FIVE BELOW LISTED AS "M
SCELLANEOUS" N "NATURE OF 13JILDING
PERMITS
14
Sur -Charge -
$
3375 Mike Collins Ur
Eight Unit -
88
Miscellaneous -
155
—
8457 L25-28,B4,Eag.Ind.#4
Unitog $ NA
$ 15.000
q43$1c97CO11c"
TO ]'A[, -
$ 15.00
*Total Fee -
720 Blue Gentian Rd.
4'arren8473
$ 18.00
L1,B2,Aud.Su6. 31
4065 Old Sibley Rwy.
Eustis Iious $ 800.00
thern
$ 17.50
0
8505
10-01900-031-52
. Gas $ 9,000.00
1�;Ahlecraft
$ 74.50
0
$ 79.00
8515
1--.8511--l-3883-Beall
3500 Dodd Rd.
$ 9,000.0074.50
Co. �OO.G
X50
0
0
$_79.00_
$ 0.00
10R% Tn9'AI C
I_
VUlu
NU:IBBR
017 BUILDING PLRHI'I'S 15SUIiD J
AI•IOUNI'S 01 V
-UU%I Iol,s 8 Flili';
stnglc Family
- 224
Ind%Comm/]nstit,
- 9
Valuation -
$33
91i,75'.OU
Duplex -
60
Rcs. Garage -
18
Bldg. Permit Fee
- $
175,917,50
Four Unit -
HIS
Swimming Pool -
14
Sur -Charge -
$
16,0S.1.0(1
Eight Unit -
88
Miscellaneous -
155
Plan Check Fee -
$
S4,830.7S
Apt/Condo -
0
TO ]'A[, -
676
*Total Fee -
$
945,036.45
VUlu
3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
BEA BLOMCUIST
EAGAN• MINNESOTA 55121
Moo -,C,
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
THOMAS EGAI I
JAMES A. SfAIH
JERRY iHGiFAS
October 6, 1983
HEODOR.,-.j !•CHiER
THOMAS HEDGES
G;r ncmnsac:w
EUGENE VAN 01/EREEKE
MR THOMAS J NIKOLAI
Ct,cle"
1504 RED CEDAR RD
EAGAN MN 55121
MR G W TANK MGR
FACILITIES PLANNING
SPERRY CORP CPTR SYSTEMS
SPERRY PARK, P 0 BOX 43525
ST PAUL MN 55164-0525
Re: Concerns Expressed by the Timberline Neighborhood 8 Eagan Ci
u
Concil Regarding Excessive Noise Generated by the Semicondu
Facility Located on the Sperry Park Site Within The City of
Dear Mr. Nikolai and Mr. Tank:
At the last regular meeting of the Eagan City Council that was
held on Tuesday, October 4, 1983, the City staff was directed
to work specifically with a representative of both the Timberline
Addition and Sperry in an effort to minimize the impact the
semiconductor facility is creating on the welfare of the adjacent
Timberline Addition neighborhood. The concerns that have been
raised by the Timberline neighborhood and addressed by the Eagan
City Council are as follows: 1) The onsite security and operations
lighting for the semiconductor facility is reflecting outside
of the Sperry Park property onto the adjoining neighborhood.
The City Council stated a solution at the City Council meeting
to confine all lighting in a controlled, reflective manner so
there is no impact on the adjoining neighborhood. 2) The 300 -
foot greenway that was originally proposed for the semiconductor
facility should be researched, reviewed and a determination
made as to whether that condition is in conformance with conditions
set forth in the preliminary plat and planned unit development
agreement. Mr. Dale Runkle of the City's Planning Department
will review these agreements with Mr. Tank and provide a response
for a later meeting. 3) The noise level generated by blowers,
fans and other mechanical equipment is creating a nuisance for
the adjacent neighborhood. An immediate solution was directed
by the City Council to construct some type of wood screen
device for the purpose of diverting noise in a south, southeast,
or southwest fashion. This device would be a simulated noise
03
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
CITY OF EAGAN/THOMAS NIKOLAI & G. W. TANK
October G, 1983
Page 2
absorption device and used as an experiment. 4) The City Council
also asked that a long-term and permanent solution be developed
to restrict or minimize noise impact on the Timberline Addition.
5) The City Council, for the benefit of the neighboring Timberline
Addition, would like information about the hours of operation
as to when truck traffic is to be expected which services the
semi conductor facility. The City Council would like efforts
to be made by Sperry to minimize the amount of truck trips that
are generated during nighttime and weekend hours. 7) Landscaping
to consider berms, trees, and other types of ground covering
should again be reviewed as it relates to the berm that was
constructed on Sperry property adjacent to the Timberline Addition.
A meeting is scheduled for 4:00 P..M., Thursday, October 20,
in the office of the City Administrator to discuss these items
in more detail. Any efforts that can be made by Sperry to prepare
some measures to resolve any of the problems that were discussed
at the City Council meeting prior to the meeting scheduled for
October 20 would be greatly appreciated. Those persons invited
to the meeting include the City Planner, Mr. Dale Runkle, the
both of you, and myself. If another neighbor of the Timberline
Addition or employee of Sperry is felt to be appropriate, they
are certainly invited and welcome to attend this meeting. The
meeting is scheduled in an effort to work cooperatively as a corpora-
tion, neighborhood, and City to resolve these problems to the
best of everyone's satisfaction. Thank you for your cooperation.
(�
Sincerely, �
\.Oma" •Y��` &c0%�
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner
TLH/kf
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1983
SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING & INFORMATIONAL
A reminder that a special City Council meeting is scheduled for
Tuesday, October 11, 1983, beginning at 6:00 p.m. The first item
of business will be brief 5-7 minutes of cable commission candi-
dates. There are 8 persons who have submitted interest by submit-
ting a letter. Those letters are attached on pages through
for your review. There are also 3 persons who se ved on the
previous commission who have expressed interest in being appointed
to the new commission which is designed to provide the administra-
tion for the new cable communications system. As a reminder, the
first joint cooperative agreement that was executed under the joint
powers statute for Burnsville and Eagan provided a commission to
explore and jointly franchise cable communications for the two com-
munities. Now that franchising has occurred, that commission is
abolished by its mere action of recommending franchising to the
two City Councils. The new commission will be fulfilling a dif-
ferent purpose which is administration of the new cable communica-
tions system and will be ongoing through the length of the franchise
agreement. The City Council will be appointing four members to
the commission, referenced as directors, two of which will serve
a two year term and two of which will serve a one year term and
then eventually all directors will serve two year terms on a stag-
gered basis. There will also be the appointment of one alternate
and that term is for one year. The joint agreement specifically
states that the Council of each member city shall appoint by resolu-
tion it four directors, one of whom may be a member of the Council
and the other 3 shall be residents of the member. Therefore, the
City Council may appoint a member of the City Council such as City
Councilmember Smith was the City Council representative on the pre-
vious commission. The City Administrator has not received the final
joint cooperative agreement establishing the commission for adminis-
tration of the cable communications system. Therefore, documents
are not available for distribution to the City Council. City Coun-
cilmember Smith is very familiar with the document and can provide
certain briefing to the City Council if an applicant was to ask
a question that pertains to the structure or organization of the
new commission.
At 7:00 p.m., the City Council will be considering some assessment
appeals and that information is enclosed in a memorandum prepared
by the Director of Public Works enclosed on pages 14. through
The City Attorney and Director of Public Works ill handle
this portion of the City Council meeting as staff members.
City Council Meeting Memo
October 11, 1983 Meeting
Page Two
INFORMATIVE
Sperry Noise Complaint
The City Administrator has sent a letter to Mr. Tom Nikolai and
Gerry Tank discussing concerns that were expressed at the last regu-
lar City Council meeting, as it relates to noise, lighting and other
items that were brought before the City Council. A copy of that
letter is attached for your review.
Building Permit Surcharge Rebate
I thought it would be interesting for the City Council to learn
that the City has .received a building permit surcharge rebate in
the amount of $19,472.39.
September Monthly Protective Inspections Report
Attached is a copy of the September Protective Inspections monthly
report.
Roger Franke and Jo VanOverbeke
Jo VanOverbeke is doing fine, having fully recovered from her sur-
gery and has sent a thank you card to be shared with the City Coun-
cil. Also, for the sake of combining a copy, an article appeared
in the October 5 Minneapolis Tribune that Roger Franke has resigned
from Group W and was appointed the cable administrator for the North
Suburban Cable Communications Commission. A copy of this article
and Jo's thank you card are enclosed for your information.
kwwwwi
Mayor Blomquist attended the Board of Directors meeting for the
AMM last evening and learned that the City of White Bear Lake has
dropped its membership from AMM due to the inability of the associa-
tion to formulate a joint and cohesive approach regarding local
government aid. A copy of that letter is attached for your informa-
tion. Also attached -is a copy of an Action Alert by the Metropoli-
tan Council stating that the property tax portion of the 1984 budget
was reduced. The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities should
be thanked for providing pressure to the Metropolitan Council as
representative of all its member cities to reduce their budget.
M
City Council Meeting Memo
October 11, 1983 Meeting
Page Three
Finance Committee
The Finance Committee met this past Wednesday in the conference
room of the Eagan Police Department building to discuss tax incre-
ment financing and the reasons for designating a housing and rede-
velopment authority. The meeting was a marked success in terms
of gathering information and having the ability to brainstorm and
learn the aspects of tax increment financing and the reasons for
recommending a housing and redevelopment authority. Dave Kennedy
of the LeFevere Lefler law firm and Wayne Berggraff of Evanson Dodge
will be retained by the City of Eagan as special legal counsel and
fiscal consultant respectively on the tax increment issue. The
City Administrator will be looking for final ratification of those
consultant appointments at the October 18 meeting. The finance
committee is exploring, gathering information and providing direc-
tion to the consultants at this time on a number of issues such
as what constitutes a development district for tax increment finan-
cing, how will the tax increment financing issue benefit the City
of Eagan, what is the role of the HRA, can there be a port authori-
ty used in our community with this issue and many other related
questions. The next meeting of the Finance Committee is scheduled
for noon Thursday, October 20, at which time the committee will
ask for information that can be compiled into a report specifically
on the HRA for review by the City Council in preparation for the
public hearing on October 27.
Clerical Unit Ratification
Following work yesteray, the Clerical Unit ratified the 1983-84
contract in agreement with the final proposal by the City Council.
Final ratification will be, scheduled for City Council action at
the October 18 meeting.
ICMA Conference
The City Administrator will be in Kansas City for the most part
of next week. If there are any matters that need City Council at-
tention, feel free to contact Holly or Tom Colbert who will be in
charge in my absence.
City Administrator
TLH/hnd
73
- Dear Mr. Hedges; _
I am a resident of Eagan and would be very much interested
in serving on the Burnsville -Eagan Cable Communications
Commission. Even though I have never had any experience
of servingthis
on type of board before, being a fairly
new resident of Eagen, I want to become involved with affairs
of the community.
_. I am not sure what information you may be interested in
_-- - concerning my background, but I can be reached at the above
address or by calling 921-1300 during working hours.
"- Thankyou for consideration on the commission.
:•:':.',"__, Sincerely,
(Kent W. Sorenson
...:.,::,aic•: ..:
kws
6 iZ333
Tom Hedges
Eagan City Administrator
,Mr. Hedges,
I am interested in helping serve the residents of Eagan by serving on the
Burnsville -Eagan Cable Communications Commission.
I moved to Eagan 21-2 years ago after living in New Brighton. My,employer for
the last 4'2 years has been Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company. My job
as a Commercial Lines Underwriter involves selection and pricing of business
insurance.
My college education was at Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa where I graduated
in 1979 with a major in Marketing and a minor in Statistics. I have been
continuing my education with the Chartered Property and Casualty Underwriters
program which I should complete in June 1984.
Please feel free to contact me at 925-4100 during business hours. I will be
out of town on a business trip from October 13-29 so I will not be able to
attend the October 18 City Council meeting.
Thank you for your consideration and I hope to be hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
"Lr
Neil F. Machen
4673 Jackstone Point
Eagan, MN 55122
S_
a4 -
�ec l.; LL
7 ✓ Ae Z(iLCl� M UV!'L1LL��(Y,
17
Ile
'Z
tH .Cr." ✓ Cr"Lc�G (.,'%��"-ce�v DiQ.�� �Ke G�L�cifl.��.a•GC�
✓ti`C�P/7 _ 023_ c<tea LQ
.106t�
wt�
�.�-
��
P-6 1,
� .
/ 4c
c•LruLL^C.�icC
&,
6
pjjc
3111 Farnum Drive
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
October 6, 1983
Tom Hedges
Eagan City Administrator
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
I am writing to express my interest in being considered
for a position on the Burnsville -Eagan Cable Communications
Commission. I understand that the purpose of the Commission
is to coordinate the administration and enforcement of the
recently -adopted franchise agreement.
I have enlcosed a copy of my resume, which lists my
experience as an attorney and my outside interests. I have
had past experience in community activities, and I understand
the way organizations of this type function. I believe that
I can bring a unique perspective to the Commission, based
upon my experience as an attorney and my involvement in
community issues.
I have lived in Eagan for about one year, am married,
and have a 3 -month-old daughter. As a concerned individual
and father, I have a vital stake in the future of television
in our community. I would appreciate your full consideration
for this position. Thank you.
7
STUART DAVID GIBSON
3111 Farnum Drive Birthdate: March 8, 1951
Eagan, MN 55121 Height: 5'10"
612/454-2285 (home) Weight: 165 lbs.
612/725-7474 (office) Marital Status: Married
EDUCATION
Juris Doctor, Cum Laude -- University of Minnesota Law School
June 11, 1976. Grades: (16 -point scale) 13.305, Top 25% of Class
Authored Article, "Comprehensive Models for Assessing
Lost Profits to Antitrust Plaintiffs," 60 Minnesota
Law Review 1233 (1976);
Appellate Advocacy Instructor, 1975-76;
National Moot Court Competition, 1975;
Antitrust Seminar with Minnesota Attorney General, 1975;
Law School Council.
Bachelor of Science in Journalism -- Northwestern University
June 16, 1973. Grades: (4 -point scale) 3.07.
Major: Advertising Minor: Economics
Intramural Athletics
Marching Band
EMPLOYMENT
Senior Trial Attorney -- Internal Revenue Service, Office of
District Counsel, Boston, Massachusetts and St. Paul, Minnesota.
Since May 9, 1977.
Tax Court Litigation: Settled over 95% of Tax Court
cases before trial. Successful in nearly all cases
tried in U.S. Tax Court.
Criminal Tax: Highest inventory of criminal tax cases
in St. Paul Office. Frequent assistance to U.S.
Attorney's Office in prosecuting tax crimes.
General Litigation: Expert on enforcement and defenses to
I.R.S. summonses and on disclosure of tax information.
Have represented I.R.S. agents under subpoena.
Attorney and Law Clerk -- William E. Mullin, formerly of Mullin,
Weinberg & Daly, P.A. 1976 and 1977.
Assisted in litigation involving antitrust and civil
rights matters.
Law Clerk (during law school)
University of Minnesota Law School, Appellate Advocacy
Instructor. 1975-76.
Analytics, Inc. Law Clerk for economic consulting firm,
specializing in antitrust cases. 1975-76.
Minnesota Department of Commerce, Legal Assistant to
Assistant Attorney General in Securities Division. 1974-75.
no
STUART D. GIBSON
EMPLOYMENT-RELATED ACTIVITIES
Instructor•
Expert Witness Training Program, St. Paul, 1981.
Indirect Methods of Proof Training Program, St. Paul, 1981.
Continuing Professional Education for Revenue Agents,
Fargo, 1982.
Continuing Professional Education for Special Agents,
St. Paul, 1982.
Participant•
Criminal Tax Training Program, St. Paul, 1977.
General Litigation Training Program, Boston, 1978.
Trial Attorney Training Program, Chicago, 1980.
Technical Conference, Dayton, 1981.
Midwest Regional Conference, Kansas City, 1982.
OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES
Alumni Admissions Council, Northwestern University.
Volunteer Attorney Panel, Southern Minnesota Regional Legal
Services, Inc., St. Paul
Treasurer and Board of Directors, Midland Grove Condominium
Association, Roseville.
Community Advisory Board, KSJN Radio, St. Paul
ORGANIZATIONS
Minnesota State Bar Association
Ramsey County Bar Association
Minnesota Civil Liberties Union
ADMITTED TO PRACTICE
Minnesota Supreme Court: October 1, 1976.
United States District Court, District of Minnesota:
December 6, 1976.
United States Tax Court: August 4, 1978.
REFERENCES
Hon. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass Carol Grant, Esq.
Judge of Muncipal Court Meshbesher, Singer & Spence
Hennepin County Government Ctr. 1616 Park Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55487 Minneapolis, MN 55404
612/348-4740 612/339-9121
Professor Leo Raskind
University of Minnesota
School of Law
Minneapolis, MN 55455
612/373-2851
Hart Kuller, Esq.
Winthrop, Weinstine & Sexton
1800 Conwed Tower
St. Paul, MN 55101
612/292-8110
��716,9 1J T E ISE
September 26th, 1983
Tom Hedges
EAGAN CITY ADMINISTRATOR
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, 11n. 55122
Dear Sir:
I would like to be considered for a position on the Burnsville -
Eagan Cable Communications Commission. .
As a resident of Eagan, I have followed, with interest, the development
of cable service to our two communities. I have attended several City
Council meetings, but could not become involved with the early committee
because of my business committments.
At this point, I can bring to the new commission, twenty four years
experience in broadcast, educational and corporate television. I am
Vice President and a co-founder of Computer Video Productions, Inc.,
a Bloomington based teleproduction facility.
The business base of Computer Video covers both local as well an national
companies, with interests in all levels of television production, including
interactive videotape and videodisc.
I have, in the recent past, consulted on production capabilities proposed
in Cable company franchise applications. Most recently for the Southwest
twin cities suburbs and Two Rivers, Wisconsin.
I look forward to talking with you concerning the commission appointments.
Please contact me if you require additional information or references.
My business and home numbers are listed below„
Best
Regards,
pv /. .
Dean N. Sutliff /
Business : 888-2388
Home: 452-6897 1765 Gabbro Trail Eagan, Mn. 55122
/0
1317 Clover Dr. S., All 1-35W A 494, Minneapolis. Minnesota 55420 • (612) 888-2388
ROGER G. FLING
3998 Riverton Avenue
Eagan, MN 55122
(612) 454-2291
September 30, 1983
Mr. Tom Hedges
Eagan City Administrator
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minn. 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges,
I wish to submit my name for possible consideration as
a member of the Burnsville -Eagan Cable Communications
Commission.
I have been a home owner in Eagan for approximately eleven
years and a businessman within the greater metropolitan
area for the last twenty five years.
While my experience is somewhat limited in this area, I
do have a great deal of experience in telephone and computer
communications systems.
I also feel that my lack of experience in Cable communications
may be overcome by the enthusiasm that I will bring to this
very important commission.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sin rely,
'7i>
oger G. Flin
October 3, 1983
Mr. Tom Hedges
City Administrator
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Mn. 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
This is my letter of application for a position on the Burnsville -
Eagan Cable Communication Commission.
My wife Donna and I have lived at 1253 Carlson Lake Lane, Eagan for
the past 5 years and consequently satisfy the residency requirement.
My background includes 20 years of electronics, data communication
and data processing experience. I believe that this background
would be invaluable in understanding issues and opportunities arising
from the implementation and operation of a cable television service.
My desire to serve on this commission stems from my interest in the
many opportunities that this technology brings to the home. My part-
icipation on the commission will be to help ensure that the im-
plementation and operation of the cable television service is mon-
itored for quality and reliable service. I will look forward to
assisting the commission in the evaluation of future enhancement and
expansion of the cable service also.
If there should be any questions regarding my application I can be
reached at home phone 452-7364 or business phone 341-6321.
Si cerely,
Raymond L. Stevens
13
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR COLBERT
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1983
SUBJECT: INFORMATION FOR OCTOBER 11, 1983 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
As the Council may recall, .during the final assessment hearing for
the following projects, written objections were submitted by' the
affected property owners and subsequently followed up with formal
appeals certified with the clerk of district court. Subsequently,
the City Council continued the public hearing for these affected
parcels to a later date to follow the required procedure of evalua-
ting special benefit to the parcel installed in relationship to
the amount of the assessment proposed to be levied.
Therefore, October 11 was established for a meeting of the City
Council as a whole to evaluate the benefits in each of the following
parcels._ This meeting will be conducted by the City Attorney and
will be providing testimony from the consulting engineer, Public
Works Director/City Engineer and the appraisers retained to evaluate
the benefit for each of the parcels involved. Since this is a con-
tinuation of a formal public hearing, public hearing procedure will
be followed.
PROJECT 297R, BLACKHAWK LAKE TRUNK STORM SEWER
HORNE & HORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
The original public hearing for this project was held on May 20,
1980 with the final assessment hearing being scheduled for July
20, 1982 at which time Mr. Horne submitted written objections per-
taining to the proposed assessments. Subsequently, the City Council
has continued this public hearing for the final assessments several
times to allow Mr. Horne and the City staff to work out a mutual
agreement pertaining to the resolution of this trunk storm sewer
assessment. Although Mr. Horne has verbally agreed to the execution
of such an agreement, staff has been unable to obtain his signature
on this agreement. Therefore, it is the staff's recommendation
that we proceed with the formal public hearing pertaining to special
benefit relating to the final assessments as originally intended.
At the final assessment hearing on October 11, City staff will be
presenting documentation pertaining to the topographic layout of
Mr. Horne's property and its relationship and benefit received from
this project. Information is enclosed on pages through Zp .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve the final assessment roll for Project 297R against Par-
cel #10-02100-010-01 and all of King's Wood Addition except Lot
11 and authorize the certification to the County Auditor for col-
lection.
Public Works Director Memo
October 11, 1983 Special City Council Meeting
Page Two
PROJECT 182R, T.H. 55 STORM SEWER OUTLET
STANLEY PIEKARSKI
On November 18, 1980, the public hearing was held for the installa-
tion of a trunk storm sewer outlet from the ponds located on T.H.
55 north of the Burr View Acres Addition. Upon completion of the
project, the final assessment hearing was held on July 5, 1983 at
which time Mr. Piekarski submitted a written objection followed
by a notice of appeal to district court pertaining to his proposed
assessments in the amount of $11,272 based on a net assessable area
of 8.62 acres at $561 per acre after applying a 20% credit to the
gross area of 10.32 acres. (Pagan Z th rough '2 )
Mr. Piekarski claims that there is no benefit derived from the in-
stallation of this trunk storm sewer and that he should not be as-
sessed for the. project. Enclosed on page _21 is a copy of the
minutes from the April meeting of 1976 wherein Mr. Piekarski ori-
ginally petioned the City for the installation of this project to
alleviate his property from flooding. Staff will also be presenting
pictures taken the spring of 1980 wherein again is shown Mr.
Piekarski's property flooding due to lack of this storm sewer pro-
ject. In addition, City staff will be presenting topographic lay-
outs of his property to help determine and show the benefit received
from this project. Enclosed on page is a location map of
Mr. Piekarski's property in relationship to the ponds controlled
by this storm sewer project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve the final assessments for Project 182R against Parcel
#10-03800-080-02 and authorize the certification to the County Audi-
tor for collection.
PROJECT 240, DREXEL HEIGHTS STREETS
PILOT KNOB PROPERTIES
The original final assessment hearing was held in September of 1980
and subsequently revised on December 16, 1980 to incorporate the
additional costs incurred by the City to fulfill the developer's
responsibility relating to subdivision and platting within the City.
Subsequent to the December 1980 final assessment hearing, Pilot
Knob Properties submitted written objections and followed through
with an appeal to district court of the assessments levied. Through
court proceedings, district court determined that the City did not
follow the proper procedure in determining benefit to the property
in question. Therefore, the City Attorney is recommending that
we proceed with this new final assessment hearing to discuss the
benefit received from the improvements installed in relationship
to the assessment in the amount of $4,467.50 per lot for the 24
I JI
Public Works Director Memo
October 11, 1983 Special City Council Meeting
Page Three
lots within the Drexel Heights subdivision. There is no additional
information that can be provided at this time that has not already
been presented at several previous hearings. Enclosed on page
is a copy of the Drexel Heights subdivision for Council's reference.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON .THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
for Project 240 and approve the assessments in the amount of
$4,467.50 per lot to all 24 lots within the Drexel Heights subdivi-
sion and authorize the staff to certify the assessments to the Coun-
ty Auditor for collection.
16
SAC 8/30/82
B. PROJECT 297, BLAC HAWK LAKE OUTLET - ASSESSMENT OBJECTION
i
6. James and Arvella Horne (Parcel No. 10-02100-010-01 and King's Wood Addition
Horn,- D] uv lnn nr rnV rAi-inn e..� r,.
BACKGROU m IIm'ORNF noN
Enclosed on Page 9 / is a copy of the written notice of objection that was sub-
mitted by Mr. Horne at the final assessment hearing held on July 20, 1982. En-
closed on Page Jag- is a referenced location map showing the relationship of these
parcels to the overall assessment area for Project 297. Mr. Horne's first objec-
tion pertains to a procedural requirement pertaining to notification of public
hearing for the project which was held on May 20, 1980. This contention is correct
in that these parcels were inadvertently omitted from the official individual par-
cel notification for that public hearing. However, formal notices were published
in the legal newspapers and this area is, in fact, included within the proposed
and designated area assessment for Project 297.
Their second objection, pertains to trunk area storm sewer assessments against pro -
pe 'y that "can contain its present and future water drainage". Enclosed on Page
33 is the location of this property in relationship to the drainage basin and
ex sting storm sewer facilities that presently service this property. The present
pond (JP -5) that is contained within portions of Mr. Horne's and Horne Development
Corporation's property presently has a positive storm sewer gravity outlet provi-
ding direct drainage into Blackhawk lake. The gross acreage of parcel 10-02100-
010-01 is 27.59 acres. 7/10 of an acre was deducted for the existing pond (JP -5)
and a 20% credit was applied for potential future right-of-way and easement dedi-
cations. This resulted in a net assessable area of 21.51 acres (936,975 square
feet) which was assessed at the agricultural rate of 3.4C per square foot. This
resulted in an assessment figure of $31,857.17. All lots within the King's Wood
Addition were assessed at the single family/agricultural rate based on their ac-
tual square footage. These assessments ranged from $442.00 per lot to a maximum
of $3,213.00 per lot for Outlot 3 (2.17 acres).
If Mr. Horne will not agree to a waiver of the procedural requirement of individual
public hearing notification, the City should pursue a new public hearing process:
with a new final assessment hearing. However, because the property owned by Mr.
Horne, or Horne Development Corporation, lies within the drainage basins benefited
by the Blackhawk lake Outlet and due to the fact that the pond lying within this
property (JP -5) has a positive storm sewer gravity outlet into Blackhawk lake,
the staff feels that the assessments should remain as determined and presented at
the final assessment hearing held on July 20, 1982.
conlalns
Doti e .-��,�� p pI� �zw �• C�.
17
PK'_
PRa7I- 297 — AssmsET AREA
Ll
WO
`_ •`` ~�'/ ;SC
C a�l.. LI
INCUS IAL\le PARI(\\ A
is CEW
� A
R-4
Ll 41
CB -L R R LA
G.GBS p
LI • • i%/'�,`��\ "CSC 4\ ` `'t-'.2opie�-.r s �L�--�C �`: A
SCSC PF
rRr• `t A :/ A R•4 r• a` I.� _.?�" �� A � - R•I '/
LI LBP.;r----.', :7r-v.O` • r - r!, -.UC SE
.�-��5wq �+2P.T _ i. 'I -T3` 1 R•I ,t `i :.i' _ '�' `�I /
PF L
.: A _' < PELaeu•Ir.+=.:O C- r, R•L ! I� -_
[III `��y • '--�TiiT PC xIV1•NO°LE I A
Y
•�• GB �B•��I. ['EN _ a��4 i l A a R.3 r.
.%: PF - II PK,' ... r C/ I RB �I
II B rd R._. _.^i.. pF `Ti r: L e s • n I I
MBaPo w .,
_Z.
5c.00L i ` o. ---, `l,R C a , i i7.A° A\\o c 1 n.c r'-",� - :.i ..u•Gs:
R-4
_u.IN�,. FFA• :IL' \��. I ...^ A N 0-4
PK I'= :II r�'- 'y `tnawas / _.PiL-.
.1 {�'� .:. �•, t'=Li�,�� i '-f``' R-4
'�.11: .I .L1 :Clx Rar l�� [; .A dL rlwa: •,. � xElGxi vTI�—J�..v.
OK
�d w
Y•RI •� /i C ^ R 4 i,
-R-4
R I
CSC rrf •�� '�at,
`[•,,elv�-• �Aq.\C 9� Ynl[al, �, P. ip C5C 1 ^-iKu. 1� �'-rL't " R 11\ KZI_IIlal ' ' W it �cI=an ri NLJA'A
I', ; II'!B� ..I _ RrvCR RB i A A ;\- A A14 -vq_3—.
Z`\ ��1 I LR A �TEsr
PF_'� wrtR 1! �. ��_ (� 5. Fllr RI
/J( A ,1 . Rs LB `J� �I R-2 , u `t�%i1 ,n F� >< ^a -1r r ` R•1
.. _..- r NK:C}L� . .ai IEIl__ Ij%C R I -'�` r•°
awL[Arr•Cv50^.1I —- R•3
A � � GO'riSv Iota,
Imo ---'r rte`/ =' \•\'.�: f• r±'; \ %� ?;r.
PK
eJPK
R-� 1 \ .%•F i � - ,5 . 1 .4 ' , r, ,_ R- .:iy 4�.L� lr �
A 1' .•%i'.. A '•fir' i. sj'4r'oi�].4.t�{T'.-9a�. .,' `��I Gw�'), r -
i "s f " , L^+.+.^ � t� 1 f ,•rf� .'I .-^1 J i' r , y r ,.
rLr• !r Yt ' r:.- r . 1,.1, � � � ..rte .. i' PIC f'. Zr
., lr. ✓, ... �.. ,,.-..t�y:.�;'�,�\. ar.�-f�Y,J,. .: i�t4,r ��M.
RIA 4 I I G+• ,• II
/f/? P � �—
--- -`
-14\
1; j I '' ',�• !i/` D-19
�. •.�-,tom -- L_ f 'LENAr:s Io 121
/• /J,- \ C -Is )r•': i:rV'J us POST__ .I.
—J\ ; ` rarygr r �/ SERV -CE -=_E-
D-
-I•awiNn4%/•T-� \ C_IB �,:�p"16,5 ./ D-13
/:- I 1
I `.�,-- N
_-I l r . ETERE cJi / n AL2 .
y. •:! i/ /.n,�. ., ��r., y16_Ii—f z�_-Z
I I
./ r.
,,y+`'/ .:r '' (,i F,, rror 19 , iC"17 \ �I
C-2�
C-5
C_T�-i-�,,, n�ocE FC -19' ( y-�5 � f -20
r�Y //— n.rrt�
/� C-6 /.. �C, 'I '.r--�•. ice+==1'�:.�; _J
`C 3 /^ C-10 rrs IC�3 1-7
_7 ''V','
/ ! , }Oc Isr 2N0 ',._��, •/ 'I D•19 � iD-23
`F ^
tAL AR
/
l
;� - - rte. �i<r - •�1 I /
-
�r 4
�. �A•B A 9 // c -•LAKE ��._✓- \;
•%7 OPS Y _ _
'Ul it\Yt/4J<O=�iQ� _ l-ti/�/1�•;� ... -
;'; :AES -, �' a; lKc -.,!_ 6.40' r / \ } i+J-IS
I -�•, /\J-62\
J-62 f
57
•_i::•�_ •-urs[--<NOA-LE �•',/ 8-34 1 /�/�•�-7 -'� ` ���." �.' ^I'\�
?4
/21� , 'i�J ,•' CJ-6~..J�--�.'-�,f�
1 r s.
A23 \.i' i 8-35
1 g_3X1B-36
"' I•• /A_35 �/I e/ al _ I'.. 'v�-3VLv L_7 k/ li
" B 9 II
V-2 (� J-65'
J r / _2 'B
I i B•7' / ' u Jf�L
8-24. 8-23`10
.. ).vmn •,,r;,'.Ln _
�r - ,, 71 -'JC�.F ;:i�-•�-1,..,`ti x:.,113
/�A'13
v
-33 ' .�/A-3a 9.27.: 1.• ••.. �, B - r
„ • , f"... • ..\ l ^_ _ .
\ A�/ i� J .: 5.28�/�y ,�.9-la ate. •`. ��1 ..r- Ift
4
�:
r.r\/8:I Bc15 -•�. `�4':� r �� �o•?is�,•�r�.:•..'�
- - �. _'_ 8_3-~�`-'Z��51 _Rn�.�_ �IL u� _ i r�B116 I,1�\_c ��••-, `'\�,'-.._ :•l ���ttii=�
8-22 —/�'� �i-r•� T'-'i—�'Ti��-T ..��: •�'
A-34
` }h� , I • I .. v .j
'�`��/ r ••L-qn ,.�., ,� 1 8-20
and no backing onto either service road adjacent to Country Club or Highway #13;
further that there would be no more than two driveway access locations to the
parcel.
SPECIAL PERIfIT FEES. Upon motion by Smith, seconded Rahn, all members votin',
yes, it was RESOLVED to authorize a fee schedule for special permits under
Ordinance #52 consisting, of $50 for the original permit and $25 for annual re-
newals.
BURR OAR AREA DRAINAGE. Mr. Stan Pikarsky appeared and reported serious
drainage problems on his property immediately North of Highway #155 in the Burr
Oak area created flooding on his land. He requested that a study be prepared for
storm sewer to provide for outflow to the Burr Oak Lake to the South. Rahn moved
and Smith seconded a motion to authorize the City Engineer to prepare a prelimi-
nary report and to report back to the City Council.
PROJECT #174 - CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PABX STORII SEWER. The City Engineer indicated
that there was no final response from the MCC concerning its request for contri-
bution for tha installation of a proposed storm sewer near Commanche Road. Wachter
moved and Rydrych seconded the motion that the City Council take no action on
Project #174 until an affirmative response is received from the NRICC concerning
contribution for the cost of the projects, and that the final decision in the
matter be tabled until such time.
PROTECT #1uS - SIBL EY TERNIMAL ii.,^,USTRIAL P:\ I: STO a SMIER PROJSCT. The City
Engineer recommended that Phase 1 of the project, consisting of a trunk to the
railroad tract: and a subtrunk to the rear of the 'Murphy Trucking area, be in-
stalled at the present time. He further stated that there has been no answer from
the Minnesota Highway Department concerninn its contribution. Polzin moved and
Rahn seconded the motion to install Phase 1 of Project #168.
A letter from Pre :tuna doors was read objecting to the project and a repre-
sentative from Murphy Trucking appeared and requested an extension of time to
-7- a
JOSEPH PERRY qq
.N�forney at
June 30, 19113
City Cleric
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, 1,1n. 55122
Re: Stanley Piekarski. property. PRL,,r. i Sa
3350 Highway 55
Eagan, 14n. 55121
Dear Clerk:
B03 COMMERCE BUILDING
ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101
222-6896
VJe are filing a written objection pursuant to R'iin-
nesota Law before the assessment hearino on July 5, 1953 at
7:00 p.m. The grounds of our objections are:
1) We have not received any benefits from this, only
additional hardships.
2) That private property .is being used raithout due
compensation.
3) That the
property has been damaged first
by the
highway
department and secondly
by the
city of
Eagan in
the, use of the property
v:ithout
oerrais-
sion, without
compensation, and
contrary
to the
laws and
the constitution of the
State
of Min-
nesota.
4) We believe that any assessmenL for any storm sel:rer
improvement that has be -n contemplated and has actual-
ly completed is illegal and unconstitutional.
ctiycly SI -1141 Lt - re d
torri'ey for �bCi owner.
I ,
Stanley/T. Piekarski.
a2
�b
etQ,� �
STATE OF MINNESOT a0 J
3 r
COUNTY OF DAKOTA Q
Mr. and Mrs. Stanley Piekarski,
Appellants,
VS.
City of Eagan,
Respondents.
DISTRICT COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Now comes the Appellants and alleges the following:
I.
The Appellants own in Joint Tenancy homestead property
located at 350 Highway 55, Eagan, Mn. 55121.
II.
That the Respondents are attempting to illegally procure
an assessment against said real property in the amount of
$11,272.
That at all time the Appellants have conformed with Min-
nesota law and profected their appeal rights and are hereby
appealing to the above Court on the grounds:
1. That said assessments is not a benefit to said prop-
erty, but creates additional hardships.
2. That private property is being used without just corrr-
pensation contrary to law, the state and federal con-
stiution and fairness.
/011 n
3. That the property has been damaged first by the highway
department and secondly by the city of Eagan in the use
of said propery without permission, without conpens-
ation, contrary to the laws and constituiton of the
state and federal law.
4. that the assessment for a storm sewer improvement was
illegal and unconstitutional.
IV.
Wherefore, Appellant prays for a judgment against said
Respondent for the following:
1. For a dissimissal of this assessemnt .against appel
lant's property.
2. For legal fees in preventing this action, and costs and
disbursements incurred herein.
3. For any other remedy the Cour ems just and equit
able. (\
pn yerry
tt rney for App lants
8 Commerce Bldg.
St. Paul, Mn. 55101
222-6896
COUNTY -----STATE----'°'-----AID
—� HIGHWAY — —
0
,r::.-. •; �"\ i � Jit;, M.,9E'.,.: � . -
City of Eagan c
;fir y� i ..r.i Jet (°ii 'r:rgy:�: 3: •3.
I-rl
�l�' 012-00
/9 /b♦ v ' s" :v y.. •a'r I '-A —___S 45.04. •w-•+ o:.
Aff
.G � _r `„ �� i- :r:.l Je5011-00 :r...:+• . 4 ,. ax.li.�h of �t9m _ _° D!�� Nu:5�1:' _
y „p+� •' ,. d s Oi =00 Pm 1 Dow^ City of Eagan
F _ \ =ro o
i<JJ R %�• :h' .�
City of 4.:•>Y-, �it U6w\a' v 020-00
/ Eagan
'r rrs 5;. �� •J b_ ZQ, \A '. �` �d �::.. .( , `\ Ca0. 030-00 -
i� n°i q S;-_ 5 �1 r\;( ��"•+'`, �t r\r�\•� .II Ifi / . �.�saist
td`r L -f
01��-azCity of Eagan
;e o®�' / 010-00 i 1 Tit^
LAK I •O .+ •i';., \ d " . Y I >I le i ° s:EC\ < ,l
HCl!: Pt
1 R 4 _�� oa VV r+`.T 't,.•n �� � C}• +J,.��, ir4.
�: 5:%}. s .030-00
•,1 City of Eagan 1'1
f 1 r+ ® I-
t 4 ,� Via. nDo� 1, . E 1a + e+a a '..''. f r•`x• /� 1 n
N x y I w s ..• I �� �r -r-
ola
8-a2 Pi , O� ° rte• wDR` g f;�a �°
+ _ t.r-r -S f R 3 .
X: r • R } " +Q V'y`. +a• '''1 .,.�.p; p •' !,
a ., Y 'c t' •...; a
1 rn
040_52 ' ji
s 30� t . r. . '
Il •S. N,S_, Q 4d6 — •rY¢nC �'•K9A-- • tt 6'; C
d� � ..F Y Ygg dI" �• o Is � 9 M1 t � � , fI,
September 29, 1983
Chairman of the Board
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
183 University Avenue E.
St. Paul, MN 55101
c/o Vern Peterson
Dear Chairman:
i
v.s
The City Council of White Bear Lake during its budget hearings
this last week voted to withdraw our membership in the Association
of Metropolitan Municipalities. Their decision was the -result of
two concerns. First we'must exnresG our r ncerr�uii;h the ;+
of the Association to formulate a joint cohesJive__apprnarh +., tkie
questionof state unding o ocal government. We believe that
tfie Association; -because of the diversity of its membership, is
paralyzed on these critical issues. Secondly, the City is faced
with tha choice of where to appropriate its available funds for a
lobbying effort which would have the greatest impact. We believe
that those funds would be better spent.with a group of cities
that have common interests and objectives.
I personally appreciate the work that has been done by the
Association in past years and realize the difficult situation
the organization finds itself in due to economic uncertainties
at the state level and the diverse composition of the Association.
On behalf of the White Bear Lake City Council,
BGS:im
ly,
cc: City Council of White Bear Lake
a7
4820 Cook Avenue 9 While Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 9 Phone (612) 429-8526
For Immediate Release:
1984 Work Program
And Budget Approved
For more information
contact the Public
Information Office
612/291-6464
Ken Reddick
291-6422
Friday, '
Sept. 23, 1983
The Metropolitan Council voted Thursday to out the property tax portion of
its 1984 budget by $175,000.
Council Chairman Gerald Isaacs said the action lowers the projected
increase in Council revenue from property tax sources from 8.3 percent to 5.2
percent.
"This is below the average increase of 6.3 percent in municipal budgets
that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities had urged us to meet, and
is a fiscally sound and responsible move on the Council's part," Isaacs said.
The action reduces the amount that must be raised through the agency's
regionwide mill levy from $6.06 million to $5.89 million. The overall 1984
Council budget totals $10.91 million. The Council is authorized by law to levy
up to .267 (8/30ths) of one mill. The reduction means the agency will be
levying .258 mill.
The 1984 Council budget compares with a 1983 budget,,as amended, of $9.96
million. The original 1983 budget was $9.38 million.
In related actions Thursday, the Council cancelled more than $30 million in
property tax levies for sewer and park debt retirement purposes. Resolutions
V
adopted by the Council authorize the use of $31.3 million in the Council's
Sewer Bond Fund and $1.57 million in its Parks and Open Space Fund to pay
principal and interest on outstanding regional sewer and park system bonds.
more
Money in the sewer fund comes from payments from municipalities and from
charges against other users of the regional sewerage system. The park funds
were provided by the Minnesota Legislature to finance the retirement of debt
incurred in connection with acquisition and development of the regional parks
system. If sufficient money is not available to handle the sewer and park
debt payments, the Council is,required by 'law to raise it through the
property tax.
The largest proportion of 1984 Council revenues, 66 percent, will come from
local sources, primarily the property tax. The federal share of the budget, a
rapidly declining source in recent years, is pegged at 30 percent. This
compares with more than 60 percent in 1979. The state share of Council
revenues is less than four percent.
The work program outlined in the budget was described by Isaacs as
"comprehensive and ambitious." Priority items include revision of several
major regional policy plans, including those on growth and development, health,
housing, aviation, solid waste, and parks and open space.
Other activities include preparation of a new regional plan, on economic
development; completion of plans for services to aging people; the beginning of
a comprehensive study of barge fleeting and water transportation; and the first
inventory of all land use in the Region since 1962.
The budget calls for an increase of six people in the Council's staff
complement, raising the total to 217. This is a decrease from 238 in 1980.
-30-
�:
':<���'
.•..
;?;�
�"`i
�S�i'
;y'•.
': .?�a'i
::}'I
:� r
:'� i.�.. .Ci
{p
Franke, a former aide to Govs. Wen-
dell Anderson and Rudy Perplch,
will assume the post Nov. 1. During
three'years at Group W, Franke was
the company's Minnesota franchis-
Ing manager and director of commu-
ally affairs for Its six Twin Cities
cable -television franchise areas.
Franke represented the company
during the 1982 fight for the subur-
ban Ramsey County cable franchise.
Group W, a wholly owned subsidiary
7 of Westinghouse Electric Corp., beat
out Storer Cable and United-Zylstra
Communications Co. for the 15 -year
franchise to bring able television to
Arden Hills, Falco Heights, Lauder-
dale, Little Canada, Mounds View,
New Brighton, North Oaks, Rose-
ville, St. Anthony and Shoreview.
He has continued to represent Group
W . before the commission during
construction of the suburban Ram.
e more expensive dual
cable system the company promised.
Group 'W officials did meet with
commission chairman Tom Curley
Sept: 17 to discuss that, but Curley
rejected the suggestion.
Group W Area Manager Terry Shu-
ster said he was surprised and "most
unhappy" to find Franke's letter. of
resignation on his desk Tuesday
,morning. But hp said they part on.
good terms.
Commission attorney Tom Creighton
said Franke's hiring does not pose
any conflict of interest problems, ei-
ther to the commission or Group W.
"The conflict question was discussed,
certainly. First of all with respect to
his contractual obligations to Group
W there Is .... no problem. And,
'second, from our point of view, we
.felt that his knowledge of the people
In Group W would be to our advan.
tage."
djPcs TR 9 /a -r -e j
Cable official quits to join
overseer: ®f ex -employer' 1
By Paul Gustafson
Staff Writer
sey County system, which Is sched-
.' uled to be completed in May 1984.
A top local official with Group W
His desire .to return tolpublicseclor
Cable resigned late Monday to be-
employment, and the chance to help
come cable administrator for the
North Suburban Cable Communica.
^ oversee the operation of a first -rale
.:cable television'system, led him to
tions Commission, the group that reg-
ulates Group W's sble system in 10
apply for the commission job,
Franke said. '
cities of suburban Ramsey County,
-' .,.°: •'^!
Roger Franke's switch from compa-
Schmidt said that "Roger knows.the
'Inner operations of Group W, and he
ny official to company regulator sur-
knows that franchise agreement :..:
prised Group W officials and delight-
(Group W officials) won't be able to
ed cable commissionmembers,
some of whom view his hiring as a
.: snowball him one bit, and therefore
they won't be able to snowball the
way to ensure that Group W lives up
commission."- Schmidt said he's wor-
to Its franchise obligations.
rled, for example, that the company
'
Franke is "kind of our special insur-
is falling behind Its construction
schedule. r••, -
ance policy" to make sure Group W
I -:, , . ,.
lives up to Its agreement to build "a
Cable commission members became
Cadillac cable system" for the 10
suburbs, said vice chairman Steve
upset last month when they heard
rumors that Group W officials might
Schmidt, a New Brighton council-
"' -. "
approach them with a proposal to
man.
build only a single cable system, to-
stead of th
Franke, a former aide to Govs. Wen-
dell Anderson and Rudy Perplch,
will assume the post Nov. 1. During
three'years at Group W, Franke was
the company's Minnesota franchis-
Ing manager and director of commu-
ally affairs for Its six Twin Cities
cable -television franchise areas.
Franke represented the company
during the 1982 fight for the subur-
ban Ramsey County cable franchise.
Group W, a wholly owned subsidiary
7 of Westinghouse Electric Corp., beat
out Storer Cable and United-Zylstra
Communications Co. for the 15 -year
franchise to bring able television to
Arden Hills, Falco Heights, Lauder-
dale, Little Canada, Mounds View,
New Brighton, North Oaks, Rose-
ville, St. Anthony and Shoreview.
He has continued to represent Group
W . before the commission during
construction of the suburban Ram.
e more expensive dual
cable system the company promised.
Group 'W officials did meet with
commission chairman Tom Curley
Sept: 17 to discuss that, but Curley
rejected the suggestion.
Group W Area Manager Terry Shu-
ster said he was surprised and "most
unhappy" to find Franke's letter. of
resignation on his desk Tuesday
,morning. But hp said they part on.
good terms.
Commission attorney Tom Creighton
said Franke's hiring does not pose
any conflict of interest problems, ei-
ther to the commission or Group W.
"The conflict question was discussed,
certainly. First of all with respect to
his contractual obligations to Group
W there Is .... no problem. And,
'second, from our point of view, we
.felt that his knowledge of the people
In Group W would be to our advan.
tage."
PROTECTIVE r[SPFCTI_O::S
mnNTHLY RPPORT
NUMBER OF PER`:ITS ISSUED
Building
SEPTEMBER, 1983
Year -To -Date
I\S_PECTION/OFFICE HOURS
96
77588
Building
This ?[onth
Year -To -Date
Plumbing
5 300.
1,819.5
Water Softener
153.5
1,169.5
Administrative/Office
79.0
625.5dministrative/OfEicc
Fire Marshal
3g,p
38.0
421.0
Miscellaneous
6
364.5
Ceneral Office
.p
36.5
Perrit Processing
163.5
1,542.0
84,513.25
139.0
1,053.0
NUMBER OF PER`:ITS ISSUED
Building
This ?'onth
Year -To -Date
Electrical
96
77588
Plumbing
760
hVAC
61
617
Water Softener
87
9
512
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
6
31
Signs
Total Fee*
19
Single Family
5
27
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
YTD
MONTPLY
1933
Tvnc
Permits
Valuation
Permit Fce _
Plan Chr_ck
Fee
Total Fee*
397
Single Family
47
$
3,196,000.00
$
15,799.50
$
7,899.75
84,513.25
56
Dl17Ie:{
4
$
214,000.00
$
1,171.00
$
585.50
$ 7,003.50
123
Multi-Family20
$
889,000.00
$
2,989.50
$
1,494.75
$ 27,42S.75
13
Co.-aercial
1
$
87,000.00
$
394.00
$
197.00
$ 1,909.50
2
Industrial
0
0
0
0
p
0
Institutional
0
0
—_—
0
—
0—
p
21
Res. Carne_
5
$
30,500.00
$
258.50
0
$ 304.00
_ 9
Swim. Pool
1
$
6,000.00
$
56.50
0
$ 59.50
154
:lie_ce_llnncous
TOTALS
18
96
$
73,600.00
$
$
744.50
21,443.50
$
52.25
$ 2,794.75
775
$ 4,496,100.00
$ 10,229.25
--
$ 124,313.-5
- YFAP.-TO-DATE. 1953
$50,264,400.00
$222,621.00
$105,361.50
$1,268,715.14
* Total Fees Include: P.uilding Permit Fee, Sur -Charge, Plan C`ieck Fee, SAC Unit Fee,
Water Connection Fee, Water Meter Fee and Road Unit Fee.
33
PRorEC'1'1VIE INSPIECTIONS - ADDITIONAL MON'I'IILY 1NFORI•IATION
SEPTEMBER, 1983
LTI-FAMILY 11AFAKDO1114
ERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL MD INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDO1.3J
1; iIdin_C
Permit :''
MIE11+er of
Number of
Number of
AI•IOUNI'S 01 V
n Check
Scrviee
flan (:I:ecl,
10-03500-010-01
I I'C
PelmitsB11i
Idi TIPS
U11 is
Valuations
Permit FCCS
Charge
FCCS
TOLa] I'CC*
10111' Unit
175,917,50
"OTE: FIVE BELOW LISTED AS "M
SCELLANEOUS" N "NATURE OF 13JILDING
PERMITS
14
Sur -Charge -
$
s
Ic1:111101:50
4
1.
4
$176,000.00
$1,024.00
$ 88.00
$ 512.00
$ 6,764.00
Eight Unit
$ 15.00
*Total Fee -
720 Blue Gentian Rd.
4'arren8473
1'olmhcusc
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i
i
ApirtmcnLs or
$ 74.50
0
$ 79.00
8515
1--.8511--l-3883-Beall
3500 Dodd Rd.
$ 9,000.0074.50
Co. �OO.G
Condominiums
16
1
16
$713,000.00
$1,965.5
.50
$ 982.75
$20,664.75
TO'I'A1.S
'-0
2
20
$889,000.00
$2,989.50
E$444.50
$1,494.75
$27,428.75
ERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL MD INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDO1.3J
1; iIdin_C
Permit :''
--
ddress legal
860 Cliff Road
Ol;ncr Valuations
Dakota
Permit FeeFees
AI•IOUNI'S 01 V
n Check
Total Fccs•
8482
10-03500-010-01
County $87,000.00
$394.00
$33
197.00
$1,909.50
60
Rcs. Garage -
18
Bldg. Permit Fee
- $
175,917,50
"OTE: FIVE BELOW LISTED AS "M
SCELLANEOUS" N "NATURE OF 13JILDING
PERMITS
14
Sur -Charge -
$
3375 Mike Collins Ur
Eight Unit -
88
Miscellaneous -
155
—
8457 L25-28,B4,Eag.Ind.#4
Unitog $ NA
$ 15.000
q43$1c97CO11c"
TO ]'A[, -
$ 15.00
*Total Fee -
720 Blue Gentian Rd.
4'arren8473
$ 18.00
L1,B2,Aud.Su6. 31
4065 Old Sibley Rwy.
Eustis Iious $ 800.00
thern
$ 17.50
0
8505
10-01900-031-52
. Gas $ 9,000.00
1�;Ahlecraft
$ 74.50
0
$ 79.00
8515
1--.8511--l-3883-Beall
3500 Dodd Rd.
$ 9,000.0074.50
Co. �OO.G
X50
0
0
$_79.00_
$ 0.00
10R% Tn9'AI C
I_
VUlu
NU:IBBR
017 BUILDING PLRHI'I'S 15SUIiD J
AI•IOUNI'S 01 V
-UU%I Iol,s 8 Flili';
stnglc Family
- 224
Ind%Comm/]nstit,
- 9
Valuation -
$33
91i,75'.OU
Duplex -
60
Rcs. Garage -
18
Bldg. Permit Fee
- $
175,917,50
Four Unit -
HIS
Swimming Pool -
14
Sur -Charge -
$
16,0S.1.0(1
Eight Unit -
88
Miscellaneous -
155
Plan Check Fee -
$
S4,830.7S
Apt/Condo -
0
TO ]'A[, -
676
*Total Fee -
$
945,036.45
VUlu
3795 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
BEA BLOMCUIST
EAGAN• MINNESOTA 55121
Moo -,C,
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
THOMAS EGAI I
JAMES A. SfAIH
JERRY iHGiFAS
October 6, 1983
HEODOR.,-.j !•CHiER
THOMAS HEDGES
G;r ncmnsac:w
EUGENE VAN 01/EREEKE
MR THOMAS J NIKOLAI
Ct,cle"
1504 RED CEDAR RD
EAGAN MN 55121
MR G W TANK MGR
FACILITIES PLANNING
SPERRY CORP CPTR SYSTEMS
SPERRY PARK, P 0 BOX 43525
ST PAUL MN 55164-0525
Re: Concerns Expressed by the Timberline Neighborhood 8 Eagan Ci
u
Concil Regarding Excessive Noise Generated by the Semicondu
Facility Located on the Sperry Park Site Within The City of
Dear Mr. Nikolai and Mr. Tank:
At the last regular meeting of the Eagan City Council that was
held on Tuesday, October 4, 1983, the City staff was directed
to work specifically with a representative of both the Timberline
Addition and Sperry in an effort to minimize the impact the
semiconductor facility is creating on the welfare of the adjacent
Timberline Addition neighborhood. The concerns that have been
raised by the Timberline neighborhood and addressed by the Eagan
City Council are as follows: 1) The onsite security and operations
lighting for the semiconductor facility is reflecting outside
of the Sperry Park property onto the adjoining neighborhood.
The City Council stated a solution at the City Council meeting
to confine all lighting in a controlled, reflective manner so
there is no impact on the adjoining neighborhood. 2) The 300 -
foot greenway that was originally proposed for the semiconductor
facility should be researched, reviewed and a determination
made as to whether that condition is in conformance with conditions
set forth in the preliminary plat and planned unit development
agreement. Mr. Dale Runkle of the City's Planning Department
will review these agreements with Mr. Tank and provide a response
for a later meeting. 3) The noise level generated by blowers,
fans and other mechanical equipment is creating a nuisance for
the adjacent neighborhood. An immediate solution was directed
by the City Council to construct some type of wood screen
device for the purpose of diverting noise in a south, southeast,
or southwest fashion. This device would be a simulated noise
03
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
CITY OF EAGAN/THOMAS NIKOLAI & G. W. TANK
October G, 1983
Page 2
absorption device and used as an experiment. 4) The City Council
also asked that a long-term and permanent solution be developed
to restrict or minimize noise impact on the Timberline Addition.
5) The City Council, for the benefit of the neighboring Timberline
Addition, would like information about the hours of operation
as to when truck traffic is to be expected which services the
semi conductor facility. The City Council would like efforts
to be made by Sperry to minimize the amount of truck trips that
are generated during nighttime and weekend hours. 7) Landscaping
to consider berms, trees, and other types of ground covering
should again be reviewed as it relates to the berm that was
constructed on Sperry property adjacent to the Timberline Addition.
A meeting is scheduled for 4:00 P..M., Thursday, October 20,
in the office of the City Administrator to discuss these items
in more detail. Any efforts that can be made by Sperry to prepare
some measures to resolve any of the problems that were discussed
at the City Council meeting prior to the meeting scheduled for
October 20 would be greatly appreciated. Those persons invited
to the meeting include the City Planner, Mr. Dale Runkle, the
both of you, and myself. If another neighbor of the Timberline
Addition or employee of Sperry is felt to be appropriate, they
are certainly invited and welcome to attend this meeting. The
meeting is scheduled in an effort to work cooperatively as a corpora-
tion, neighborhood, and City to resolve these problems to the
best of everyone's satisfaction. Thank you for your cooperation.
(�
Sincerely, �
\.Oma" •Y��` &c0%�
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner
TLH/kf