Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
02/03/1984 - City Council Regular
• MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1984 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION MEMO/FEBRUARY 7, 1984 COUNCIL MEETING After approval of the January 17, 1984 regular City Council minutes and the agenda for the February 7, 1984 City Council meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: Mr. Bill Peterson, Dakota County Assessor's Office, is planning to present a property owner's request for a tax abatement to the City Council on Tuesday. Mr. Peterson has informed the City Ad- ministrator that the County is recommending denial of this tax abatement. Enclosed on pages I through 3 are copies of of the information supplied by Mr. Peterson and a map indicating the location of the property. The applicant, Mrs. JoAnne D. Lemmer, has been contacted and will probably be present at the City Council meeting. •ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an abate- ment as applied for by Mrs. JoAnne Lemmer for 1801 Turquoise Trail. �6 q0 IL a (9a, 0 • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1984 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE A reminder that our Open House is scheduled for this Sunday from 1 to 3 p.m. The actual ribbon cutting and ceremony will be at ap- proximately 2:00 p.m. The informative memo will be forthcoming on Monday with the Adminis- trative Agenda for your leisurely review. Y��V�IMJ J� City Administrator TLH/hnd 10 ►r\ •REGULAR MEETING AGENDA, EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA • 0 CITY HALL FEBRUARY 7, 1984 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 11. 6:33 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES \ III. 6:35 - ABATEMENT - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE Q IV. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS 4 A. Fire Department C. Park & Recreation Department B. Police Department D. Public Works Department V. CONSENT ITEMS (One motion approves all items) g\\ A. Contractors' License Renewals 1t1B. St. John Neumann Church for a Temporary Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor Q License for March,16,_1984 (St. Patrick's,Dance) n 1rbC. Project 395, Authorize Feasibility Report - Lexington Ave. Booster \ Station & Trunk Water Main Q,?� D. Authorize Review & Update of Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan 22E. Project 396, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Westbury Q' Addition) 03- F. Proj. 397, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Denmark Ave. -Streets & Utilities) VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS 'Z10A. Street Vacation - Old Lexington Ave. South of Diffley Road e (County Road 30) VII. OLD BUSINESS P 1% A. Timberline Civic Association Request to Review Level of Noise Emission at Sperry Q•31B. Request for Reconsideration of Liquor License Policy Change 3rj C. Off - Sale Liquor License Application, Perrier & Associates, Q• Inc., for Hilltop PLaza (Pilot Knob and Diffley Roads) t Eagan City Council Agenda February 7, 1984 • Page -Two VIII. NEW BUSINESS brO A. Michael Construction, Inc., Michael N. Monson, for a Preliminary Plat, HilLandale Addition No. 2, Consisting of Approximately 12.58 Acres and Containing Approximately 125 Dwelling Units Located in Parts of Lot 2, Block 1, Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot A, HillandaLe No. 1 in Section 20 (East of Blackhawk Road and North of Diffley Road) -1'6B. Lexington South, Inc., Jim Curry, for an Amendment to the Q Lexington South Planned Development to Exchange Land Uses on Two Parcels Within the Lexington South Planned Development in Part of the Wk of the W� of Sec. 23 `6S C. Roger Kreidberg, RLK Corp., for a Preliminary Plat, The Pines. Q Consisting of Approximately 3.65 Acres Containing 26 Condominium Units on Lot 11, Block 3, Hilltop Estates, Section 22, Directly North of Berry Ridge Road & East of Pilot Knob Road \\O D. Larry D. Peterson, The Rental Place, for a Conditional Use BPylon Business Sign Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McCray Addition in Section 19 \\1E. Request for, Preliminary Resolution to Consider $6,000,000 Multi -Family Housing Development Revenue Bond Issue/Carriage • Hills Apartment Project %5F. James B. Horne.for a Special Permit to Allow a Semi -Trailer to be Used for Storage at 3850 Coronation Road in part of the NEk of the NEk of Section 21 n\)DG. Michael C. & Joan M. Gresser, Eagan Construction Co., Inc. \ for a 4.4 Foot Side Setback Variance in a I-1 (Light Industrial District) Located at Lot 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park in the Northwest Corner of Yankee Doodle Drive & Terminal Drive in Section 8. IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS p A. Final Plat Approval, Kensington Place (Tomark Development) ` 1'57 B. Contract 84-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids Q (Wescott Road Trunk Sanitary Sewer) e.\`%C. Contract 85-5, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Fire Administration Parking Lot) NJDD.,IQ Contract 83-09, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Grove 1st & Q 2nd Additions - Street Reconstruction) X. HRA MEETING D \'�t A. HRA Meeting to Review School District 197 and Dakota County `^ Responses to the Tax Increment Financing Plan & HRA Supplemental Agreement X1. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For Those Persons Not On the Agenda) • XII. ADJOURNMENT 4 va , February 7, 1984 • JoAnne D. Lemmer---Abatement request 1801 Turquoise Trail Eagan, City of I.D. #10-16704-010-01 • • Mrs. Lemmer has requested an abatement upon the advice of her realtor. It is their opinion that the property was over -valued in relationship to other similar properties. 2 N — O m v • I BURNSV/LIE ••� © a a• ea p9 � ,a a µ • N "�i �E i RR 1 F m � , s :i'Le..{ ^.i � ora Rf • ey •`4a o rP`vb _ I a..ul � _ �r4. _..... :k,4? �`t _ a r •I "1 °\9 I�` �%La� ., R.RipC rows , N IN cii•. R,C .iV. ncx 4LDC yYk. FryS.y'( © uuY `'s._ `v/F/ ._... '7 a. _. .. le,c •—Z/��/� _�— si°`?�?uc� y'f�'�t>).�c q "0.q ` u [ � � , s T I �•} / " rT�r� ! "•O•� s",l : • :\4r eo .n iti R .m. m,•u •vs �Of� I.rwRr< i� P u.f r+ r� • � 3 0+ C$, • •• � s �Yi.� raw.[ _ .� Posf. -S • it UI4.19 ii .,0• I PW .,? IIP a RP ` �♦♦\ S er � Ntflr ,.LY ��r .,F ;n ne i G 4 tee• c`t;; 9 .ws.• 3 bl F ��., �� a .aI10 ' s1Rs.B[ .ipLRla , U pVl � 'I- 1 , • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Two • L FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- During the fall of 1983, the City Council asked that an analysis by made regarding manpower needs for each of t`:e three fire stations. The Citv Adminstrator indicated that the Fire Chief and two district captains were working on a report that would be presented at the February 7, 1984 City Council meeting. The City Administrator met with Fire Chief Childers on Thursday, February 2, 1984, to discuss the report in detail that was prepared by fire administration. Fire Chief Childers and Dis- trict Chiefs Southorn and Shildeldecker will be present to discuss the manpower report in more detail at the meeting on Tuesday. En- closed on page S is a copy of the manpower report as prepared by Fire Chief Childers which addresses minimum response for each station and the current breakdown for manpower as it relates to all three stations. There is no formal action required on this matter. Also enclosed and referenced as pages & through 7 are copies of monthly reports for the Eagan Volunteer Fire Depart- ment for the months of September and October. 0 Oe MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1984 SUBJECT: VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MANP014ER REPORT The following information was prepared by Fire Chief Childers for the purpose of re- viewing: 1) Current Manpower 2) Minimum Response for Each Station CURRENT MANPOWER The following is a MINIMUM response for each station: Station 1 1 - TOTAL Daytime Night Swing Medical Leave Station 1 28 13 12 2 1 Station 2 23 4 15 3 1 Station 3 16 3 9 4 - TOTALS 67 20 36 9 2 The following is a MINIMUM response for each station: Station 1 1 - Dispatcher 10 - To Man Only 2 Trucks 3 - Rescue • Station 2 1 - Dispatcher 10'- To Man 2 Pumpers 3 - Rescue Station 3 5 - To Man 1 Pumper 3 - Rescue 1 - Dispatcher *Could be eliminated if "all call" - but probably needed to fill air bottles, etc. If we could assume a 70% response, the absolute minimum requirement would be Station 1 18.2 Day 6 Night 36.4 Station 2 18.2 36.4 Station 3 11.7 11.7 84.5 Because of shift overlap and days off, etc., we could operate as follows: Station 1 30 Station 2 30 Station 3 15 75 • The 75 manpower total includes the Fire Chief and District Chiefs. IaA City Administrator S TH/jj EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT V / FOR MONTH OF September, 1983 11 WORK PERFORMED TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 760 Training 391 Truck 6 Equipment Maintenance 120 Station Maintenance 114 Fire Prevention 110 Administrative 227 TOTAL 1722 $ LOSS MANPOWER STATION 01 STATION 02 STATION 03 Available Days 12 7 6 Available Nights 13 14 1p Available Rotating 3 4 Medical Leave --T — _ I TOTAL 30 26 16 • FIRE/RESCUE TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS Structure 9 $15,100.00 Grass 1 Vehicle 1 1,800.00 False 7 Medical 16 Other 4 TOTAL 38 $16,900.00 LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS 9-26-83 Hwy. 13 & 28 Car $ 1,800.00 9-27-83 3155 Hwy 13 House 15,000.00 E (o Revised 1-1-83 _.� EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF October. 1983 • WORK PERFORMED TYPE MAN HOURS c� Fire/Rescue 730 $ LOSS Training 465 $3,100.00 Truck d Equipment Maintenance 150 Station Maintenance 150 Fire Prevention 188 Administrative 344 Other 6 TOTAL 2027 $3,100.00 MANPOWER STATION 01 STATION 02 STATION 03 Available Days 12 7 6 Available Nights 13 14 —�— Available Rotating 3 4 Medical Leave 2 1 TOTAL 30 26 16 • FIRE/RESCUE TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS Structure 8 $3,100.00 Grass Vehicle False 6 Medical 16 Other 6 TOTAL 36 $3,100.00 LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS 10-28-83 Olsen 2850 Pilot Knob Home $3,000.00 • 7 Revised 1-1-83 Agenda Information Memo • February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Eleven OLD BUSINESS` NOISE EMISSION AT SPERRY / A. Timberline Civic Association Request to Review Level of Noise Emission at Sperry -- City staff members, including the City A.ttcr- ney, have met on several occasions with representatives of the Spefry Corporation and Timberline Civic Association in an effort to resolve noise that is being emitted from Sperry's ventilating systemat the semi conductor facility. The Sperry Corporation has proposed to correct the noise emission stacks by a method that they hope will reduce the noise level so there is no impact on the Tim- berline neighborhood. It was necessary to design specifications and construct devices that would modify the stacks to reduce the noise emission which apparently takes several weeks and would not be completed until sometime this spring. The Timberline Civic Asso- ciation has not been in agreement with Sperry's method to resolve the issue and feels that: 1. The noise is intolerable and they want immediate correction • and/or enforcement by the City, and 2. That if the noise devices do not reduce the noise level substantially this spring, the Timberline Civic Association will be hearing the noise at a higher level once windows are opened during the spring and summer months. John Gustin, president of the Timberline Civic Association, has submitted a letter to the City, a copy is enclosed on page 1 formally requesting that the City Council review this item on th r formal agenda at the February 7, 1984 meeting. Also, Mr. Tom Niko- lai has submitted a letter dated January 24, 1984, a copy of which is enclosed on page, which offers a collection of letters and other data pertaining to the issue that he feels would be help- ful for the City Council to review prior to the meeting on Tuesday. This information is enclosed in the folder in your packet without page number. There are no additional letters to be offered by the City Administrator, realising the Mr. Nikolai has essentially copied all the correspondence between the City, Sperry and the Timberline Association. The information has been given to the City Attorney for his review as well. There is no specific action to recommend on this particular agenda item. ✓ \S 10 -C o • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1964 City Council Meeting Page Three POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered at this time under Police Department. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT C. =arks & Recreation Department -- The advisory Parks a Recreation Commission has been reviewing, at the request of the City Council, suggested names for all City parks located in the City of Eagan. Since many of the parklands in Eagan have not been formally named, it was the intention of the park department, at the request of the City Council, to formally name these parkland areas. The parks and recreation commission has completed the study and has a list of recommended park names for consideration by the City Council. Enclosed on pages 9 through /0 is a list of names as recom- mended by the commission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the list of park names as recommended by the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission. • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Pi D. Public Works Department -- There are no items to be considered under the Public Works Department at this time. C .MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR a CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JANUARY 20; 1984 SUBJECT: ADVISORY PARKS 8 RECREATION COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION - PARK NAMES As you are aware, the Advisory Commission has spent over a year reviewing lists of suggested names for -City parks. Many of the parklands in Eagan have not formally been named, but given name designation for easy identification while dealing with developers or development plats. Many of these identification names have stuck to the park areas and are often inappropriate as it relates to the features of the park or its location in the community. The Advisory Commission established a sub -committee to review these names and make a recommendation for official naming of the parks. As part of the process, the sub -committee solicited suggestions from the community wherever possible. While the response was not overwhelming to the various flyers requesting suggestions, the sub -committee did show a preference for those names suggested by respondents for several park areas. Where residents' response was not conclusive, the committee attempted to select names which had some historical significance or related to a geographical fea- ture. The committee is recommending the following names: Currently Known As Oak Chase Northview Thomas Lake Carnelian Capricorn Coachman Ches Mar Cinnamon Ridge Country Home Heights DeBoer Donnywood Fish Lake Hill Top Pilot Knob Ridge Cliff Wedgewood Windtree Woodhaven Meadowlands Hi Line • Schwanz Lake W Recommended Name Oak Chase Park Dewa-i-Rg Athletic Fields✓k\t;&'V1k-3 Thomas Lake Qo-� Carnelian Park Goat Hill Park ✓ 5° eo a 4. �ers Park✓Q Robb ms's Ravine Park✓ � Cinnamon Park Country Home Park O'Leary Park 8aJ,9y_CnrFl- Park ✓a ow eW ►Qum Fish Lake Park Berry Patch Park Pilot Knob Park Ridgecliff Park Walnut Hill Park Wescott Station Park Woodhaven Park Meadowland Park iregger5 Trail Trapp Farm Park ✓ ow January 20, 1984 • Page 2 The City Council is asked to approve those park names that they are in agreement with for official name designation. Should there be names which the Council is in disagreement with or would like further information, those parks could be struck from the list for further.consideration. KV/kf • ano xecrea �0 Agenda Information Memo • February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Four There are six (6) items on the agenda referred to as the Consent Agenda requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council desires to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the consent agenda and placed under addit.onal items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTORS' LICENSE RENEWALS A. Contractors' License Renewals -- Annual renewal of contractors' licenses for 1984 was scheduled for the January 17, 1984 City Coun- cil agenda. However, due the change in bonding requirements, it was necessary to continue this item until the February 7 City Coun- cil meeting to allow for correct documentation to be submitted to the City by the contractors seeking renewals. The list of contrac- tors seeking renewals is enclosed on pages I?- through / . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the contractors' license renewal list for 1984. • L 0 February '2, 1984 MEMO TO: (TO DGES,—CITY—ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL RE: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE PER CITY CODE 6.42 The following lists of contractors have been doing work in the City of Eagan in the seven county metro area and are considered reliable. They have submitted the necessary documents and fees and I would recommend that they be licensed to be a contractor in the City of Eagan. DP/js • • 12 HEATING, VENTILATION. REFRIGERATION & AIR CONDITIONING • 1. A -ABC APPLIANCE & HEATING 2. AIR COMFORT 3. ALLEN HEATING 4. ALLIED METALCRAFT 5. BERGHORST PLUMBING 6. BINDER, A. & SON INC. 7.. BOSTROM SHEET METAL 8. CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING 9. CONSOLIDATED PLUMBING & HEATING 10. DEPENDABLE HTG. & AIR COND. 11. DESS SOLAR COMPANY 12. DRONEN'S HTG. & AIR COND. 13. EGAN & SONS • 14. FAIRCON INC. 15. FREDRICKSON HTG. & AIR COND. 16. GENZ-RYAN PLBG. & HTG. CO. 17. GOPHER HTG. & SHEET METAL 18. HARRIS MECHANICAL 19. HOFFMAN INC. 20. HORWITZ INC. 21. J & B SHEET METAL 22. LARSON - MAC COMPANY 23. METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC. 24. NOEL'S HTG. & AIR COND. 25. PEINE PLBG. & HTG. 26. QUALITY REFRIGERATION & MECH. • 27. R & S HTG. 28. SBS MECHANICAL 13 HEATING, VENTILATION, REFRIGERATION & AIR CONDITIONING • 29. SEASONAL CONTROL INC. 30. SNELLING COMPANY, THE 31. SOUTHSIDE HTG. & AIR COND. 32. STANDARD HTG. & AIR COND. 33. STREITZ HTG. & COOLING 34. VOGT & COMPANY 35. WELTER, RAY HTG. 36, YALE INC. V l GENERAL CONTRACTORS - 1984 1. ARVIDSON BLUR. INC. 30. STIKBILT CONSTRUCTION • 2. B & K NEW CONCEPT HOMES INC. 31. T.M.J. BUILDERS 3. BRUTGER COMPANY 32. TILLGES CONSTRUCTION CO. 4. CKC CONSTRUCTION, INC. 33. TILSEN HOMES 5. DMH CONSTRUCTION 34. TIMBERLINE BLDRS., INC. 6. DACO INC. 35. TOLLEFSON BLURS. 7. DESIGN CONSULTANT 36. VALLEY INVESTMENTS 8. EAGAN CONSTRUCTION 37. VESTA CONSTRUCTION 9. ENVIROTECH HOMES 38. VOGELPOHL CONSTRUCTION 10. F & N GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC. 39. WACHTER, TED CONSTRUCTION 11. GUSTAFSON 6 ASSOC. CONSTRUCTION CO. 40. WATSON BLDG. & REMODELING 12. HANS HAGEN HOMES, INC. 41. WEIKLE & SONS 13. HOGAN HOME BUILDER 42. WESTERN CONSTRUCTION CO. 14. HUTTNER, WILLIAM 43. WOODSON DEVELOPMENT • 15. KRANZ, D.J. COMPANY INC. 44. ZACHMAN HOMES 16. LEES, BRUCE BUILDER INC. 17. 'LOVERING ASSOCIATES 18. M S M HOME SERVICES INC. 19. MCMAHON CONSTRUCTION 20. MITTELSTAEDT, D.F. CONSTRUCTION 21. MORTENSON COMPANY 22. OAK CHASE BLDRS. 23. OPUS CORPORATION 24. OXFORD CONSTRUCTION INC. 25. OZMUN-PEDERSON 26. PETERSEN, SVEND CONSTRUCTION INC. • 27. PLYMOUTH SERVICES 28. RIVERWOOD HOMES 29. ROSEWOOD CONSTRUCTION �S INSULATION • 1. ORV BAKKE INSULATION lv4FYoriffime0ila 9 WILLIAM BUNN FIREPLACE CONSTRUCTION ROOFING LES JONES ROOFING C 16 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Five ST. JOHN NEUMANN CHURCH/TEMPORARY NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE B. St. John Neumann Church for a Liquor License for March 16, 1984 O'Grady, who resides at 3770 South questing a non -intoxicating liquor Neumann parish for a St. Patrick's 16, 1984. The license application by the City Council. Temporary Non -Intoxicating Malt St. Patrick's Dance -- Donald Hills Court in Eagan, is re - license on behalf of St. John Dav Dance scheduled for March is in order for consideration ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the temporary non -intoxicating malt liquor license as requested by St. John Neu- mann parish for a dance on March 16, 1984. 17 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Six PROJECT 395/AUTHORIZE FEASIBILITY REPORT C. Project 395, Authorize Feasibility Report - Lexington Avenue Booster Station & Trunk Watermain -- On January 21, 1984, the City Council authorized the purchase of 1.5 acres of land at the northwest corner of new Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road which has been designated the site of the future 5,000 G.P.M. water booster station to service our high-pressure zone. In accordance with the Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan of 1982, it was anticipated that the trunk watermain along Lexington Avenue from Wescott Road to Diffiev Road was anticipated to be phased in during 1983 in order to maintain adequate water supply to the high-pressure system in accordance with the projected growth rates. A recent analysis by a consulting engineer, Mr. Bob Rosene, indicates that this trunk watermain must be installed prior to the summer of 1985 in order to avoid potentially serious shortages of water due to the increasing growth in the high- pressure system. In order to complete this distribution system from our new treatment plant to the high-pressure zone, it is necessary to boost the pressure from the intermediate zone to the high-pressure zone. Subsequently, this necessitates the simultaneous construction of a 5,000 G.P.M. booster station as a part of this project. :, Enclosed on pages 19 ^through LO is a letter from our consultant • indicating the necessity and timing for this proposed project. Therefore, based on this information, the Public Works Director is requesting authorization to prepare a feasibility report to review the cost and potential assessments associated with this proposed project in anticipation of having a public hearing this coming spring. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 395 for the installation of a trunk watermain and booster station on Lexington Avenue. 11 4 1395 W. 9...I.4*4.196 &. p..[ M, ._ti 55119 P4a.. 612.636-4'600 February 1, 1984 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55121 Attn: Mr. Tom Colbert Re: Lexington Avenue Booster Station and Trunk Water Main Eagan, Minnesota File No. 49 Dear Tom, RECEIVED FEB 2 Am M, Gk. R. Cook, AL K.kA A. Gordan. P.E 771 m E. Nara. P.E RkMrd W. Fwt , P.E. Rohn G. SMa M. P.E Marts L Swrob, P.E. O.Nd C. RurpNr. P.E. Jap A. RRadan. P.E Mart A. Hann. P.E TM K. FW P.E Mk T. Racer.... P.E Rohm R. PRpaM, AF And L.*k P.E Chat A. &kk, LW M. PawBkr Harl.r M. 01m This will confirm our discussion with you recently relative to the need for • additional water supply 'capacity in the south area of Eagan. At the present time, all of the water being supplied to the south area of Eagan is provided through a 12" diameter trunk water main on Pilot Knob Road plus the supply provided by Deep Well No. 5 in the south well field area near Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road. During peak demand periods, the flow provided by these sources has not been 'totally adequate. With the completion of the new 4 MG Safari reservoir, we anticipate less dif- ficulty with this problem during this year than was experienced last year. However, continued growth in the south area increases the demands and we may have difficulty filling this tank over night during peak demand periods. Also, when the water treatment plant goes into operation, it would be desir- able to use Deep Well No. 5 only for standby purposes and not for a primary source of water. The solution to the problem is the installation of the' proposed trunk water main on Lexington Avenue between Wescott Road and County Road 30 and the in- stallation of the proposed booster station on Lexington Avenue near County Road 30. This would be constructed on the site which has just recently been acquired for this purpose. This trunk main and booster station should be available by the summer of 1985 to insure adequate water supply to the south end of Eagan. It is suggested that a feasibility report be authorized so that the cost esti- mates for the booster station and trunk water main can be provided together • with more accurate estimates of flow which can be obtained through the pro- posed trunk water main. We also suggest that a comparison be made of the flow Page 1. 9138b 19 aro G. RP.E p Ra km W.. Ravo., P.E. R... JexPh C. ArdMa. P.E 81Wy dA. Ln 6 7. P.E. Rklmd E. Tanen. AF Java C. Okun. P.E. M, Gk. R. Cook, AL K.kA A. Gordan. P.E 771 m E. Nara. P.E RkMrd W. Fwt , P.E. Rohn G. SMa M. P.E Marts L Swrob, P.E. O.Nd C. RurpNr. P.E. Jap A. RRadan. P.E Mart A. Hann. P.E TM K. FW P.E Mk T. Racer.... P.E Rohm R. PRpaM, AF And L.*k P.E Chat A. &kk, LW M. PawBkr Harl.r M. 01m This will confirm our discussion with you recently relative to the need for • additional water supply 'capacity in the south area of Eagan. At the present time, all of the water being supplied to the south area of Eagan is provided through a 12" diameter trunk water main on Pilot Knob Road plus the supply provided by Deep Well No. 5 in the south well field area near Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road. During peak demand periods, the flow provided by these sources has not been 'totally adequate. With the completion of the new 4 MG Safari reservoir, we anticipate less dif- ficulty with this problem during this year than was experienced last year. However, continued growth in the south area increases the demands and we may have difficulty filling this tank over night during peak demand periods. Also, when the water treatment plant goes into operation, it would be desir- able to use Deep Well No. 5 only for standby purposes and not for a primary source of water. The solution to the problem is the installation of the' proposed trunk water main on Lexington Avenue between Wescott Road and County Road 30 and the in- stallation of the proposed booster station on Lexington Avenue near County Road 30. This would be constructed on the site which has just recently been acquired for this purpose. This trunk main and booster station should be available by the summer of 1985 to insure adequate water supply to the south end of Eagan. It is suggested that a feasibility report be authorized so that the cost esti- mates for the booster station and trunk water main can be provided together • with more accurate estimates of flow which can be obtained through the pro- posed trunk water main. We also suggest that a comparison be made of the flow Page 1. 9138b 19 City of Eagan • Eagan, Mn. Re: File No. 49 February 1, 1984 available through the trunk extension from Wescott to County Road 30 and from Dvckwood Drive to County Road 30. Please advise if additional information is desired relative to this matter at this time. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert W. Rosene RWR:li • •9138b Page 2. ZO Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Seven REVIEW 8 UPDATE/COMPREHENSIVE MASTER STORM SEWER PLAN D. Authorize Review and Update of Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan -- In the past, the City has tried to maintain a schedule of updating all our comprehensive utility plans on a five-year interval to help in the review of proposed future developments. In the past, comprehensive storm sewer maser plans were prepared in 1967, 1972, with the most recent being completed in 1978. The Putlic Works Director delaved consideration for updating the most recent comprehensive storm sewer plan until 1984 to insure that it would incorporate all the design considerations that have been taken into account during the progression of I -35E through the City. With this review and design coordination with MnDot being completed, it is now appro- priate to have our Master Storm Sewer Plan updated to take into consideration the latest regulations of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and to incorporate the recommendations of the Water Quality Analysis studies that have been performed by the USGS during the past four years. It is also beneficial to have this plan updated to incorporate all the recent development improvements that have occurred during the last 5-6 years. With the rapid growth that the City of Eagan has been experiencing • in the past, it is essential that our Master Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan be kept as up-to-date as possible. In addition, the 1982 Legislature mandated a surface water management program (Chapter 509) which the City of Eagan will be required to comply with. Part of this requirement is a comprehensive storm water management plan for the Gun Club Lake watershed district. • Subsequently, the timing is appropriate to have this plan updated in the near future. I have reviewed the time table and cost estimates with our consulting engineer, Mr. Bob Rosene. It is estimated that this report can be completed by mid -summer 1984 at a cost of approximately $16-18,000 which would be the responsibility of the trunk storm sewer fund. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Authorize a review and update of the current Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan to be performed by the consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. 21 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Eight PETITION/FEASIBILITY REPORT/WESTBURY ADDITION E. Project 396, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Westbury 1st Addition) -- Enclosed on page 1.3 is a petition that we received from the developer of tFestbury Addition requesting the preparation of a feasibility report along with the simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specification to install public streets and utilities within the 1st addition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition from Dave Gabbert and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 396 for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Westbury 1st Addition. 2Z • • n L I Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Nine • PROJECT 397/DENMARK AVENUE F. Project 397, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Denmark Avenue - Streets and Utilities) -- Enclosed on page 2s- is a petition received from the Federal Land Company requesting the installation of streets and utilities on Denmark Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Yankee Doodle Road. This collector street extension is required in order for the first phase 'of the Fagan Heich,ts Commercial Par:; PUD =o be developed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 397 for the installation of streets and utilities on Denmark Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Yankee Doodle Road. • • • • • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Ten STREET VACATION/OLD LEXINGTON AVENUES A. Street Vacation - Old Lexington Avenue South of Diffley Road -- On January 17, the City received a petition requesting a vacation of public right-of-way for old Lexington Avenue as it extends south from Diffley Road. Enclosed on page 2 is a graphic description of this proposed easclnent vacation. While this public right-of-way was never officially dedicated nor acquired by the City, it reverted to a public right-of-way designation through a "perscriptive easement" through continuous use by the travelling public over a period of years. Subsequently, it has shown up on County records as being public right-of-way. This public right-of-way is proposed to be vacated to conform with new alignment of a public right-of-way to be dedicated as part of the Kensington Place development. All public notices have been and sent to all potentially of this date, staff has not proposed road easement vacation the City's vacation of this vacate any public or private record. published in the legal newspaper affected private utilities. As received any objections to this It should be noted that through street right-of-way, it does not utility easements that may be of ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of public streets for old Lexington Avenue extended south of Diffley Road. 26 ....... . ....... X, NO -04'00-E IB6104 (MEAS.) 'VESCI P j'l;g ,— JJ 957540 273 V (M R. 35 12,15, N 3152 1 Isa 39 849 (MEAS N -04'32 W 'ON AVE. LEXNG w ouTLor A 9 tr% BLOCK 4 6 ou7tor OUTLOT F OUTLOT 0 11 OUTLor E 4t OUTLOT 4 'U ....... . ....... X, NO -04'00-E IB6104 (MEAS.) 'VESCI TIMBERLINE CIVIC ASSOCIATION 3061 Woodlark Lane Sagan, MN 55121 JAN 10 1984 January 7, 1984 Mr. Tom Hedges, Administrator Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Mr. Hedges: This letter is to respectfully request permission to be included on the City Council agenda on Tuesday, February 7, 1984. The purpose of the request is to allow the Timberline Civic Associa- tion to speak with regard to the noise emanating from the Univac manufacturing plant next door to our properties. I anticipate two or three separate short presentations. Sincerely, : M. Gus in, President 1 M L. LAW OFFICES HAUGEN AND NIxOLAi. P.A. • 1936 MIDW BY PLAZA BUILDING BOI NICOLLET MALL ORRIN M.HAUGEN MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 66402 THOMAS J. NIROLAI (612) 339-7461 DOUGLAS L-TScHIDA January 24, 1984 ,JAMES T. NIKOLAI Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55123 Re: Sperry Corporation's Ordinance Violation Dear Tom: JAN 2 4 i284 To facilitate the City Council's further consideration of Sperry's failure to bring the semiconductor manufacturing plant into compliance with the R do D Zoning classification under which it is suppose to be functioning, 1 am enclosing six sets of the correspondence generated to date in our attempts to obtain relief from the noise and other problems which this new plant has created. I am also enclosing an audio cassette tape which contairif�recordings taken at various times over the past several months of • the noise being emitted from Sperry's ventilating system. The Timberline residents would appreciate it if you would distribute these folders to the mayor and to the council members prior to the public hearing, which 1 believe has been scheduled for February 7, 1984. Also, we would like you to make the tape available to the mayor and council members so that they can hear, and make an informed judgment as to whether this noise is "negligible" as required by the R do D Zoning classification or even at a "low level" as a Sperry official indicated in one piece of correspondence. This is the noise that Sperry is now putting in our bedrooms. We hope you and the City council members will agree that this is an intolerable infringement upon our rights as property owners and that the City will put all of the pressure at its command on Sperry to rectify this problem immediately. TJN/ljr Enclosures • cc: J. Gostin Ver truly yours Tho as . Ni olai 150 Red C r Road Eagan, MN 55121 30 PATENTS TRADE MARKS COPYRIGHTS Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Twelve LIQUOR LICENSE POLICY CHANGE B. Request for Reconsideration of Liquor License Policy Change -- At the last regular City Council meeting the request by Mr. David Perrier, representing Perrier and Associates, Inc., was continued until the February 7, 1984, meeting. The item was continued to allow the two outstanding liquor license holders, Mark and Pam McCrea and Jean Parranto of J.E. Parranto & ?ssoC13t35, to prcvide a letter to the City Council outlining their .intentions for using their off -sale liquor license. Mr. Perrier presented this request before the City Council at the November 15, 1983, City Council meeting; however, there was no consideration given due to lack of justification presented by Mr. Perrier in advance of the meeting. A letter has been submitted by Mr. David Sellergren, representing Mr. Perrier, asking that the City Council reconsider its off -sale liquor license policy by amending the policy to include a fifth license. Mr. Sellergren recently submitted a second letter also in support of Mr. Perrier's request for reconsideration. Copies of both letters are enclosed and are referenced as pages 3 2. through 3 6 The City Administrator has received letters from McCrea and Associates and J.E. Parranto Associates, Inc. stating their intent to use the off -sale liquor license. Copies of those letters are enclosed on pages 7 through • %S_ for City Council review. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a change in the liquore license policy to add a fifth off -sale liquor license within a specified geographic area of the City. 31 Q 'LALRIiI\, 11OFFMJ\V, DALY & I.IVDORE.N, LTD ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER 7900 XER%ES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55.31 TELEPHONE f8121835-3800 TELECOPIER NO.:612: 835-5102 1100 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55.02 TELEPHONE 1612) 338-6610 December 29, 1983 The Honorable Bea Blomquist 4504 Oak Chase Road Eagan, Minnesota 55123 FEDERAL PPAcrICE PARTNERSHIP LARKIN. MCCARTMY, NOEL a TALK SUITE .110 1301 PENNSYLVANIA. N. W. WASHINGTON, OC. 20004 TCLEPHONE 12021)3)-1000 LEAN 1.4PPr P[r[w .. BLI:. JBN 0...I9.Z[W[.I MICH.cL s....oyu[D inBM.D n.MN eo6c Klc. I. N+ucMza •oPw[aT o. NOwun .•.Ica P. c.ACI e..I.C..e+n.n CVwTIN D.N ON .. oywuM T..0 1 n [ TOGO I. •w[Lu.n c.Tn. E.I e..i' JOD[Pn I. O.TI" .NBwLW J..II L K 10.. .. DTI. c J T" ..COiT[w n.[[NH_oOON ALD JANcr L a. M.c oo N N0' L. no LT ew.BL[T M. L[nwM.N B[.T91 .. POTn W [ILL. ON LA w. L y[w PPwILL OM.M . y P[TIC P49.yL B.PLIN11Tr [VDAN R, BywHIB nT [ya.H [. B.w N[[ • DARK 0..O1 n6ow LMLa K. GTE., NAOMI P. WI64.MSON OF COVNt[L 1111P. 0.1.3 [BION[ Dear Mayor Blomquist: We represent Perrier & Associates, Inc. In November 1983, David Perrier asked that the Council consider a revision to City Code Section 5.52, Subd. 12 which sets a limit of four off -sale liquor licenses in Eagan. Mr.Perrier asked that the Council consider the issuance of a fifth license for the central -eastern section of Eagan. I write this letter to set forth in writing facts and reasons which support a reconsideration of Mr. Perrier's request. Mr. Perrier wishes the policy to be revised so that he may conduct an off -sale liquor business at the Hilltop Plaza Shopping Center. The City Code now authorizes and the Council has approved four off -sale liquor licenses. Two are active; two are inactive. The fourth license was authorized in January 1981 when the third license was inactive. The third license was authorized by policy change in 1976. The 1980 census established Eagan's population at 20,700 people. City staff estimates Eagan's population today at 28,865, a 408 increase since the authorization of the last off -sale license. The 1983 city map, attached, indicates the location of the currently licensed premises. None of the four licenses are in the proximity of Hilltop Plaza, which is three miles from Cedar Liquor, two miles from Yankee Square Shopping Center, three miles from Silverbell Shopping Center and two miles from the unconstructed Safari Trail Center. This • 3k e.Mce w K.IM ..L .o.rnAN uCK c. 1. a. C1. .MBwLW W. eAMlc LaoN w[n OtLL w 0n acR.LO n. •R.coCOCL uL wOD[wl e. WwIiLOCn n L. uVLL1e AM - wOD[wrJ n[n N CDD[v R.N.,0 e, r.[TCnw •u[D C ERI C.SON COW.w01 BRI SCOLL W[a s1L[. JOuN• CnVOM Be.. n /ULL[w JOSEF. W rn0w. O.V-0 C. D[LL[PBR[M JOnn O. I.LL..[w ...... C. BB.LE O..6NL[w .-C....... o..MBw6cu %OCR in. wODPL. T. momrA--001 C n.w LTO t. nBB ELL L cn wla row..ew J. OI[iz[N BI rr[ I.0 w. Dui[wn[N .YCP e.DOLOMBM •u[D N, O. .r.C..[R 11.0. ..C.00iT UND• 8 .I] TN1.08"rM.N Di[VCN O..LC1L[v.H 'LALRIiI\, 11OFFMJ\V, DALY & I.IVDORE.N, LTD ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER 7900 XER%ES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55.31 TELEPHONE f8121835-3800 TELECOPIER NO.:612: 835-5102 1100 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55.02 TELEPHONE 1612) 338-6610 December 29, 1983 The Honorable Bea Blomquist 4504 Oak Chase Road Eagan, Minnesota 55123 FEDERAL PPAcrICE PARTNERSHIP LARKIN. MCCARTMY, NOEL a TALK SUITE .110 1301 PENNSYLVANIA. N. W. WASHINGTON, OC. 20004 TCLEPHONE 12021)3)-1000 LEAN 1.4PPr P[r[w .. BLI:. JBN 0...I9.Z[W[.I MICH.cL s....oyu[D inBM.D n.MN eo6c Klc. I. N+ucMza •oPw[aT o. NOwun .•.Ica P. c.ACI e..I.C..e+n.n CVwTIN D.N ON .. oywuM T..0 1 n [ TOGO I. •w[Lu.n c.Tn. E.I e..i' JOD[Pn I. O.TI" .NBwLW J..II L K 10.. .. DTI. c J T" ..COiT[w n.[[NH_oOON ALD JANcr L a. M.c oo N N0' L. no LT ew.BL[T M. L[nwM.N B[.T91 .. POTn W [ILL. ON LA w. L y[w PPwILL OM.M . y P[TIC P49.yL B.PLIN11Tr [VDAN R, BywHIB nT [ya.H [. B.w N[[ • DARK 0..O1 n6ow LMLa K. GTE., NAOMI P. WI64.MSON OF COVNt[L 1111P. 0.1.3 [BION[ Dear Mayor Blomquist: We represent Perrier & Associates, Inc. In November 1983, David Perrier asked that the Council consider a revision to City Code Section 5.52, Subd. 12 which sets a limit of four off -sale liquor licenses in Eagan. Mr.Perrier asked that the Council consider the issuance of a fifth license for the central -eastern section of Eagan. I write this letter to set forth in writing facts and reasons which support a reconsideration of Mr. Perrier's request. Mr. Perrier wishes the policy to be revised so that he may conduct an off -sale liquor business at the Hilltop Plaza Shopping Center. The City Code now authorizes and the Council has approved four off -sale liquor licenses. Two are active; two are inactive. The fourth license was authorized in January 1981 when the third license was inactive. The third license was authorized by policy change in 1976. The 1980 census established Eagan's population at 20,700 people. City staff estimates Eagan's population today at 28,865, a 408 increase since the authorization of the last off -sale license. The 1983 city map, attached, indicates the location of the currently licensed premises. None of the four licenses are in the proximity of Hilltop Plaza, which is three miles from Cedar Liquor, two miles from Yankee Square Shopping Center, three miles from Silverbell Shopping Center and two miles from the unconstructed Safari Trail Center. This • 3k LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LTNDGREN, L'r D. The Honorable Bea Blomquist • December 29, 1983 Page 3 four issued licenses are on the west side of I -35E. The fourth license (on the east side) remains inactive. Even if the fourth license becomes an active license, there is obviously a sufficient number of Eagan residents on the east side of I -35E to support a second off -sale liquor store. The Eagan Land Use Plan clearly depicts the Pilot Knob - Diffley Road intersection as a service center for the major concentration of citizens living nearby. In conclusion, Mr. Perrier's request implements a number of goals and policies expressed in the Comprehensive Plan. Furthermore, a fifth license responds to the significant growth which has occurred in Eagan since 1980, particularly the number of citizens living east of I -35E'. The location of the store is exactly where it is most convenient to both residents and employees working in Eagan. We ask that the Council revise its Code to issue the license. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Sincerely yours, • i�✓��C/Ld� David C. Sellergren, or LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. ch cc: Tom Hedges, City Manager • 34 RATIO.OF RESIDENTS PER LICENSE S�LIY N OF LICENSES POPULATION LICENSES PER PERSONS BURNSVILLE 1 31,580 1/5.369 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 1 17,810 1/2,544 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1 7,300 1/1,825 •• EAGAN' 4 28,000 1/1,000 W (OR 1/14,000 BEING USED) T EVEN WITH THE " LRANK ARGEST NUMB BEINGIUSEDER OF ERSTry�,eE6OF A1FTH LICENSEEATE15�,60U, GANw-U LD ANDSIFLCOUNTINGSONLYITHE ICENTHE 0 JAMES P. ".ERIN .00CFIT L. MOIIMA. ,A'. r DALY •O. NCMMLTN LINDGREN ANO.[. w. OAMI[LOON W[NOCLL P.A.....ON OCRALD M FRICDKL POO I., R WXIT LOCA ALUM [. MULLIGAN MOOS NY J. M C MN[SSC• RONALD P. ILCTCM[P JAM[e C. [MICR pON LOWA00 J. DRIBCOLL JAMEO w MIL.Y JOHN A ..UOM O[Nt M. /., L.. JO[CPM W ANTHONY DAVID C SELL.... C. JOHN O. FULLMER w....F C. BOYLE RICHARD A. IORSCML[w .....F L T. A. ONTAG CHARLES O. M GO [LL CHRISTOPHER J. DI[ T3 [N .1..A.I. DIAMOND JOHN M. p ArTIZ ON S. SOLOMON J... C. O JAM[6M6T.OTNEM LMpD. FICIC.00T LINDA FISHER THOMAS P. 5TOL Ary SICVC. O. LEVIN January 31, 1984 L.ARHIN, H0FF.N1,,N, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431 TELEPHONE 16121 63S-3900 TELECOPIER Na 16121 635-5102 1700 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 58402 TELEPHONE 16121338-6610 City of Eagan Attn: Tom Hedges, City 3830 Pilot Knob -Road Eagan; Minnesota 55122 Administrator 1 We: Perrier Liquor License; Our File No."12,246-00 Dear Mr. Hedges:, _ FEOEPAL PRACTICE PARTNERSHIP "FIRM, MCCARTMY, NOEL. /ALE 6 M I NSHALL SUITE 1110 1301 PENNSYLVANIA, N. W. WASHINGTON, O. C. 20004 TELEPHONE 12021737-1000 FEB % ;;04 w[TCw.R. D[CM JON 9, L , MA Cwe I THOMAS MAS e. .O VLILO THOMAS J- FLY.. wO...ST CL.. JAMESeT 0 NO. JAMES MICHA E..1.N M ICNALL URTIN MAN DANT L. JCR ON A..OUINUIMKAM" C TODD L rw[[N, CATH. C oowu. ANDREW J. MITCHELL DAVID O. MOCLUCR JOHN A .I.. M M OATES THOMAS 0. K00. A LD JANETL. HOLT DEADLY M. LK..... BEATRICE A. OTHWCI LCD SHERRIPAUL DLL OMANUNKE [U wCTICX PAUL O_.G.R..G TT SUSAN VOAM R. BARNES OVOAM C. GRN[9 Y DAME OOW ALAN I. NANCY w. er[wn nwoMl N. WILLIAMSON OI COU.BCL JOS[PN OTTIS LIN. J. FIRESTONE Enclosed please find-the-.results.of a telephone survey undertaken by our client, Perrier.and.Associates, with respect to the number of off -sale licenses'in various_,municioalities,in the Twin Cities area. We provide this.as'background:informaeion for the Council's discussion scheduled for February 7, 1984. Please note that of these 23 municipalities with private off -sale licenses, only three exhibit a ratio of population to license higher than that which would exist in Eagan upon the issuance of a fifth license. Moreover, those three communities show a ratio substantially the same as that which would exist in Eagan. I ask that this letter and the attachment be included in the agenda materials for Council review prior to the February 7th meeting. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Sinc ly, x •Dav d C. Selle gren, f LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY INDGREN, Ltd. Sig Enclosure cc: David Perrier 35 SURVEY RESULTS: OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES SELECTED TWIN CITIES' MUNICIPALITIES II. Minneapolis Area A. Private January, 1984 • I. St. Paul Area 24 80,000 1/3,333 Brooklyn Park 11 of Licenses Population Licenses/Population A. Private 6 8,500 1/1,416 Bay Port 5, 2,932 1/ 586 Hastings 8 2,830 l/ 353 Inver Grove Heights 4 18,000 1/4,500 Mounds View 3 12,539 1/4,197 St. Paul Park ;2 5,000 1/2,500 White Bear Lake 5' 23,000 1/4,600 Woodbury 2 11,800 1/5,900 So. St. Paul 5 21,235 1/4,247 "•West'St. Paul 8 18,200 1/2,275 B. Municipal 4 6,500 1/1,625 Apple Valley 10 15,000 1/1,500 New Brighton II. Minneapolis Area A. Private Bloomington 24 80,000 1/3,333 Brooklyn Park 9 40,000 1/4,444 Chaska 6 8,500 1/1,416 Burnsville 7 35,000 1/5,000 Crystal 12 25,500 1/2,083 Golden Valley 6 22,775 1/3,795 • Minnetonka 10 40,000 1/4,000 New Hope 3 18,000 1/6,000 Plymouth 6 35,000 1/5,833 Prior Lake 4 8,000 1/2,000 Shakopee 8 10,700 1/1;337 St. Louis Park 10 42,000 1/4,200 Chanhassen 4 6,500 1/1,625 Hopkins 10 15,000 1/1,500 B. Municipal Anoka Blaine Brooklyn Center Coon Rapids Eden Prairie Farmington Fridley Lakeville Mounds View St. Anthony Robbinsdale Savage Wayzata III. Eagan is Presently 4 29.000 1/7,250 With Proposed License 5 29,000 1/5,800 Perrier and Associates, Inc. 1951 Timberwolf Trail -5(0 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 McCrea & Associates 4330 SEQUOIA DRIVE • • January 19, 1984 Tom Hedges - City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota '55121 Dear Mr. Hedges: EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 • (612) 454-7427 Per your request the following letter addresses the current status of our plans to establish an offsale liquor store. The developers of the propose& Safari Mall have advised us that they are currently in the process of finalizing their construction plans. If constructions plans for the site are implemented and completed as reportedly scheduled, construction will commense in early spring of this year. Our plans coincide directly with the proposed Malls construction with a operational, date of late summer, early fall. The proposed Safari Mall development has apparently been delayed for the past several months because of a variety of economic factors. Our offsale liquor store plans are contingent on the development of the Safari Mall site and, of course, we have no control over the parties responsible for developing this site. • If additional information regarding our plans is needed, please feel free to contact us. Sinc y der! ovokez Mark 8 Pam McCrea • 37 A Minority Owned Consulting Firm JAN -0 6 1' J.E. • AAsranto sociates inc • • Commercial and Industrial Realtors Appraisals Real Estate Development January 26, 1984 Mr. Tom Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: In response to your inquiry this is to advise that I am planning to activate my off -sale liquor license during the current year 1984. This license has been issued for the general Cedarvale area. The same general location will be utilized. It is our feeling that the Cedarvale area is in need of additional retail activity to strengthen its market base. The addition of a new liquor store will help strengthen the area. We are in the process of selecting the appropriate location for a new facility. Currently the store is to be located next to the Mr. Donut at Silver Bell Road. This may or may not be the best location. However, the site will be in the Cedarvale area. When we have completed our planning, we will make the appropriate applications to the City Staff. I hope this information is sufficient for your needs. If not, please feel free to call. ocrlmaw 3S 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway 0 Eagan, Minnesota 0 55122 0 (612) 454.1800 • l J • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Thirteen OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION/PERRIER 8 ASSOCIATES INC. C. Off -Sale Liquor License Application, Perrier and Associates, Inc. for Hilltop Plaza -- This item also appeared on the November 15, 1983, and January 17, 1984, City Council agendas. In order for the City Council to take any action on this item, it would be necessary that the off -sale liquor license policy be amended to include a fifth geographic location. Enclosed without page number is a copy of the Perrier and Associates, Inc. off -sale liquor license application for Hilltop Plaza. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the off -sale liquor license application submitted by Perrier and Associates, Inc. only if a change in the off -sale liquor license policy is adopted. 39 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Fourteen • HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 A. Michael Construction, Inc., Michael N. Monson, for a Preliminary Plat, Hillandale Addition No. 2, Consisting of Approximately 12.58 Acres and Containing Approximately 125 Dwelling Units -- A public hearing was held before the advisory Planning Commission at the November 22, December 15, 1983, meetings and January 24, 1984, meeting to consider an application submitted by Michael Construction Inc. for a preliminary plat consisting of approximately 12.58 acres and containing approximately 125 dwelling units referenced as Hillandale Addition N0.2. The Advisory Planning Commission has taken considerable time at Planning Commission meetings to discuss this application and their recommendation to the City Council is to approve the preliminary plat. For information on this item refer to the consulting planner's report, copies enclosed on pagesAr(_through 5s . For additional informa- tion that was prepared by the City Planner, refer to pages 5-4 through6 For information submitted by the Director of Public Work refer to page For copies of correspondence regarding the agenda item; re er to pagesr0_3 through :Z2 - For a copy of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission recom- • mendation- concerning parkland dedication, refer to page -7S . For a copy of the minutes of the Advisory Planning Commission meeting, refer to page (s) 74 —7 Z. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Hillandale Addition No. 2. • E 0 -- CITY OF EAGAN -- SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat - Hillandale Addition #2 APPLICANT: Parts of Lot 2 Block 1, Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 Lot 2 Block 2, and Outlot A - Hillandale #1 LOCATION: East of Blackhawk Road - 1/4 mile north of Diffley Road EXISTING -ZONING: R-4 (Multiple' Residential) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: November 22, 1983 DATE OF REPORT: November 16, 1983 REPORTED B1": John S. Voss, Planning Consultant APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting preliminary plat approval for Hillan a e Addition 12 consisting of approximately 12.58 acres and con- taining approximately 125 dwelling units. This is a re -plat of a portion of the pre- viously platted Hillandale Addition #1. This property is located east of Blackhawk Road, just north of the intersection with Diffley Road. • ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently the parcel is zoned R-4 (Multiple Residential)_ This property has been zoned to this category for several years. However only a:portion :y,:,.. of the First Addition was developed with condominiums/townhouses.. The -remainder was: not developed until the right-of-way for Interstate = 35E, which passes along the southeast portion of the property, was established- In the recent taking of right- of-way for I -35E, a portion of the First Addition plat was acquired along the entire boundary with I -35E as illustrated on the attached exhibits. This property was designated for R -III development in the 1980 Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan. Therefore, the zoning and proposed development are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which proposes a density range of six to 12 units per acre. The actual proposed=.density-.is a net density of 9.75 units per acre. PLANNER'S COMMENTS: 1) Ori inal'Preliminar Plat: The original preliminary plat submitted for this area - Hillandale A dition #1 - provided for the existing Meadowlark Road to •.-continue to the east for an additional distance of about 400 feet where it would end in a cul-de-sac. It also proposed a loop street extending south. from Meadowlark Road and continuing back to the west to Blackhawk Road- It appears that this original plan is no longer -feasible because the Minnesota. Department of Transportation has taken additional right-of-way all .along the southeast edge of this property for I -35E. --This taking of right-of-way was considerably more than that which was anticipated when this property was -.•.= originally planned. Therefore the property owner is proposing, under the • Hillandale 02 preliminary plat, to provide a cul-de-sac at the end -of Meadow- lark Road as it now exists. All other accesses to the proposed apartment 41 Preliminary Plat - Hillandale Addition H2 Page 2 development would be provided by private streets maintained by a homeowner's • association. 2) Lot and Block Plan: It is proposed under the preliminary plat that this. property a ivi a into four lots. If the units are to be sold to indi- viduals rather than developed as rental property the preliminary plat should show a lot and block plan for the individual units. If the property is to be developed into four phases as rental property, there should be a guarantee that the internal street system will be developed and maintained so that -pro- posed Lot 3, which is otherwise landlocked; will be provided -with proper access.. 3) Setback Variances: The proposed site plan submitted with the preliminary plat appears to meet all the minimum requirements provided by the Eagan Zoning Code with the exception of buildings and parking spaces bordering I -35E. Along this common boundary, several buildings are shown bordering the right-of-way line wherein a minimum 50 foot setback is required. Also, a minimum 20 foot setback is required for parking and some of the proposed parking stalls are actually proposed to be located on Mn Dot property. This can only be accomplished if there is an agreement with Mn Dot and a variance is granted..by the City. 4) Homeowner's Association: The proposed Articles of Incorporation for a.Home- owner s ssociation ave been7.submltted by the petitioner. This -needs to be reviewed by the City's attorney to insure that the private streets can be • properly maintained and that all dwelling units will be guaranteed proper access to a -public street. 5) Conditions of Approval: If this preliminary plat is approved it should be su ,lett to tie following conditions as well as those proposed by the City Engineer; A. A building setback variance will have to be approved by the City along the I -35E boundaries in order to permit structures at a zero lot setback where a minimum of 50 feet is required. Also, a variance will have to be approved, as well -as an agreement obtained from Mn Dot, to permit parking as proposed over the I -35E boundary where a minimum of 20 feet is required by City Code. B. A -private street loop should be provided on proposed Lot 1 rather than a long, dead-end private street. C. Concrete curbs shall be provided along the perimeter -of all driving surfaces. D. If individual units are to be sold, the developer sha1T provide a re- vised.lot and block plan. In any instance, the developer shall provide a phasing plan. E. The City attorney shall review the proposed Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowner's Association to insure that proper access to a public street will'be guaranteed for all properties and that the Association will maintain the private streets. 4Z- Preliminary Plat - Hillandale Addition 112 Page 3 F. If the petitioner is requesting a model home and sales office ® this shall be so designated as a part of the approval by the City with any appropriate conditions related thereto. G. Park dedication shall be satisfied in a manner determined by the City Council after review by the Eagan Park Committee. H. A landscape plan shall be submitted for review by the City staff and approval by the City Council with the approval of the final plat. The landscape plan, through vegetative screens and berming, shall provide additional noise atten- uation related to I -35E where necessary and practical. ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS I. If installed privately, plans and specifications for utility and street construction shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted to the Engineering Department for approval. J. The private drives in Meadowlark Road should form a "T" intersection. K. The existing right-of-way must be vacated prior to final plat approval. L. Easements shall'be dedicated as required. ® M. This proposed development shall be responsible for trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. N. All costs associated with installing public improve- ments and private streets shall be the sole responsi- bility of this proposed development. O. Private streets shall be 28' wide and have concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing. P. No dead-end lateral water mains will be allowed. 45 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLAN- NER FROM: RICHARD M. HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 1983 SUBJECT: HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT The Engineering Division of the Department of Public Works has the following comments regarding this proposed development to be consid- ered by the Advisory Planning Comrr,ission and City Council: DRAINAGE/TOPOGRAPHY This proposed development has been previously platted as Hillandale Addition which is located in the.southeast quarter of Section 20. The existing terrain is rolling and covered with groupings of hardwood trees scattered throughout the area. The nature of the rolling top- ography results in several hills and depressions. Consequently, slopes over this area range from 2% to greater than 108. This proposed devel- opment is located within Drainage District A-21 as illustrated in Fi- gure 1. Drainage from this area is directed by storm sewer to the northwest and to Pond AP -2 which has a positive gravity outlet control- ling its elevation. The proposed grading for this development will consist primarily of • filling in the low spots by leveling some of the hills. The proposed grading will not alter the direction of'the existing drainage. In- stead, the drainage will be directed towards the internal private streets and from there into an underground storm sewer system which eventually connects to the City's existing system within Meadowlark Road. Subsequently, no trunk storm sewer will be required to be con- structed to service this proposed development. UTILITIES Utilities of sufficient size, capacity and depth exist within the vi- cinity of this proposed development to provide service to it. Figure 2 illustrates the 8" sanitary sewer layout already in place along with the B" water main located along the north edge of Meadowlark Lane and a 15" storm sewer located within the south portion of Meadowlark Lane. It is proposed to extend the sanitary sewer, water main and storm sew- er as necessary to provide service to this proposed development. These utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City standards and reviewed by the Engineering Department for compli- ance. STREETS Access to this proposed developrmnt is currently off of Meadowlark Road, a City street built to its ultimate cross section being 39' wide • with concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing. no ENGINEERING REPORT •HILLANDALE ADDITION NO NOVEMBER 17, 1983 PAGE TWO 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT This development is proposing to utilize private streets throughout. Consequently, the private streets shall be 28' wide and have concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing. Driveways into the cluster of units shall1be a minimum of 20' wide and have concrete curbing and bituminous surfacing. Furthermore, staff recommends deleting the proposed cul-de-sac at the end of Meadowlark Road. Instead, the private drives and Meadowlark Road should form a "T" intersection. Staff recommends this for the reason that the "T" intersection will provide better channelization of traffic rather than the proposed intersection of the private drives on.the cul-de-sac circle. The proposed plivate drive to the northeast corner of this proposed development exceeds the length for a dead-end street as outlined in the City Code. The distance is approximately 650' to the westernmost townhouse in this area and approximately the same distance for the easternmost townhouse in this area. Subsequently, this raises an issue for emergency vehicles which should probably be addressed by the Fire Chief or Fire Marshal. 1 • RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS All right-of-way for this proposed development has previously.been dedicated as a part of Hillandale Addition No. 1 as shown by Figure 3. Subsequently, all publicly -dedicated right-of-way and easements located withinithis proposed development will have to be vacated prior to final plat approval. Utility easements of sufficient width will be required to be dedicated over all proposed utilities as a condition of final plat approval. In addition, 10' drainage and utility easements shall be centered over all interior lot lines with a 5' drainage and utility easement being dedicated adjacent to all exterior lot lines. ASSESSMENTS This proposed development is responsible for trunk area storm sewer assessments over Lots 2-4, Block 2 of the Hillandale Addition No. 1 at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. Currently, this would amount to $22,455.00 (416,611 square feet at $0.0539 per square foot). All costs associated with installing public.improvements and private streets will be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report in detail • with the Advisi ry Planning Commission at their meeting of November 22, 1983. Res=cfu/l�lJ , Richard M. Hefti, P.E., Assistant Engineer 4s RMH/jach / w/• . nn r\ L) err. •' r 77 ACI�9 �•.,- — . "F --'-tea -,—A_70--��/ • — h9"," 1�IL r.�b 6- �� B .;.. �. , --�. OLACKHG'uM A-IS 111t.J'{:J PARK ' _ p I w3 A 57 IIlC �: i woaoHav v �• a. A J r y II I 1 '- \ If''r • lE vi j I RJr Pau. �`-7 W r H h -34i�u A.- J %, /%q1 `II �J 6 _ ' B A-5B--E24 i '-/ J B-6 • `' B-37N' �� 36 11i �� - �•. �1 .� - - 6. ,/ A-31 .43 .' � =[r7� �,d j __ (�`}'I�- �—• L A-32 -/ w r nr rn u-Crr 'w "r A 27\ A-33!' i�`A-34 gy27; ,a \• v6r -..,j�y 'i, -64 �A-37I SEN A-65 /B-2i I-S " • ti= — "" '/n��•i1�;' —-�� -B-32 Q A-66,� 1 p�7'6�7' FES A-51 1L Ji14 A7\;`` ❑❑'cENI ice 1 = oL-60/� L'59 1 11 rIr-• / -52 i r.' B-33 A B �\ r, A-69 n.. �i.�]-- ; \� A-40 ..._ x.'61 SL 1 L- -07�A-44\ OAKOTAI COu`f k<PARA 1 •�SialESa AX 'NTV L 64 A 46 ` A-48 `' A-49/x- r.� -��1, r •,(� I��l- V 1 L-55 APPLE VALLEY ���� I LT,53 ` i L-57 FIG. LEGEND PONDING AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . \ , STORM SEWERS (f•ifllN) . . . . . . . . STORM SEWERS IProrouA) . . . . . . . . - - --- - - TN STORM SEW E STORY LIFT STATION t4,,1114)• � VV .� -� r/�°�,r� 1 1 �' 22� �y ' \�;� • y�-.—.,z,. {..•- •366 X160 a.. i TRAIL e• NI n I • 1 - V L1. . ART, �\,' \ I I :67 1 S¢.Ll. „� 76. I AVE OT l 1 GAUrano ! I Tal 11 I 2 I - • T. F 163 1 I UFERVJ000, i \ -I - I 1 raa1L/Co.. fSTOIVC � 3— n' 99 I IA I 0 -- n MEADOW s•._ L A K _LANE CARNELIAN i ACJ `•,. ' '�q PARR / �Z�r a' _ I-- -�Subject I KYLARK f -THRY CIRCO 4 Oy •r CO RD 70 DRIVE Parcel DIFFLEY 1 RD_ I FIG. 2 • N o loo ir- --- umnw• �omt muu� A m°e uc EAGAN MINNESOTA SAN SEWER -• - _ WATER VAIN LOCA710N PLAN 4.47 r �. E. 1/4 SEC, 20, T 27, R 23 ..n�� w��'fl' ' � •_• • a o� O`O-7d • �. • F�� WAS. 1 Y O'JJ ' •�•.. �` TRAIL •--,�1, - - TACONITE ~�• i-4 it • y . .. I ' • - -� /•fir. if a EF a:•Y a• "•, ei r. r v.: �? -WIVE 4T' OSf • .tl., • wt a"+.._ ,—+arae• _� :- CARNELIAN City of , n Eagan 010-77 .'... PARK 1 020-77 _ 5 , 020-73 KRMARO N. LARSON o..ouou. curl• 51 o0% Vn r., rua• I: DEERWOOD ORIVE Pc �5• Rodtet, TRAIL 067-73 066-7 i rte, ,'�' 010•_76 • ' 020-76 r Ma•WM M,C 1 I/W to b ` vacated IEA OWLARR •,i ,r. ��•::{: ` // :I 2 HIL'LA LE ADDITION ,a i NO., -r. Al Al� F1 G. 3 :' a ,a u � � +. 'r •,� � �. • M 1} •i. 1. � � V 1 . _ 06 070 -7s - DRIVE *TtF i 1 a I 062-73 a —jp -.t 4WK ---7 a �Wp—DS I ' • ' - SlY•.• 0•t..•• IS n•. Y CM•\. •1. +•• Y\IT19•-•\I .. .. ANE . . ? . • - i::::::+;:?'> pir Z. RNELIAN :::.:.:... . EAO 010-77 CW�ARK >w..• '. PARK / Ld - D • e• P �:1_ '•�.,dl'J .•.. • .. Yom..• �. o ...........:..::::::....... ...................:::::: 9 i.AI. .......... .......... ozo-7e!S,_ A PART Of To 49 wrLar c L _ HILLANDALC ADDITION [1 0. 2 0 E 1bf N I • 6 II t a • !of WIrA. PiEAr�W�i bl I Isi. � x ILI 2 'L I, E -0•r- 3 �•� i 651 �-f lyj 11q, 1tt A ��l- 5'7Liol � �P • for /N/G14AELCONSTI7ClGT/ONXtK RON KRUEGER S. ASSOCIATES, INC. INA Su.VE VIM . "lIlwW . /O llb ilV M" 0W - EM. YAN1.F. uv:v 1. SUY.114 Vila MI.Ti - .• v/� SCY11 _ /OO Nv�SOI T...�. n hll l p-rl NO✓ Q_`_ y�11 j TT T Meadowlark ro - Road 4t \ I_• I r r , 011e Plan \ , 1~ / I 7y= C) �.o 6 _ C_, QON��1 E 0? 10 gox: Site Information iey.tc � ieox, �rx WIiD •I:1 Y'W�uo•cs l t P / It co Ln / wr»'ro trl'N v / V-1 yl � III ,-, j•1 _ '/`I, ' _s� fir— '•i ' PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN TION NP+fmomp P A nOCI ���. 1N - 4 r Y.. a f "" •Ili` a �\ ���� � I; LAD f 1 x. vi /I: \` \` •, %, � ` = y. J :;� i Legend: i — . \ `S �• I'�`' �\ ,`,'° / / \ �e STORM I 1 •_ ,• ' r SANITARY `\'I, r Y J ♦ \ �� .. �'i'__-r. _w____ WATER PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN COM K�BC aRsuon� 7 RB � _ .. _ ; . ...... :•:� :. Ind.; Ind ...._..... e. LB SUBJECT J?ARC R.1 A. .. Ind.:.._.... . ' R -N .. �• ... � - _ _ . J. F � 111 "VVV777"' i F R -II P R II LB R-13 _�. P, _r R -II R,( - �•�� <"•XMill`f.h-. _ . .mss-. R -Ir d-•' r — E ' e' .{ 5. R-11 - � Ind. ��-. �J �y• �- c41_s �' R1/ /.Y CSC,.. '•' P r. RI ' E R.I 1'\b_w Il o_m � Ral .Wr LB FR -III LB • �1- \f+.� �._:� CSC - �R-Fj'.; °`' �'. .,.I ) •- RB LB Gf% R -I P '.Li •ih•° R-1) r -'• 5m SLB R -I L R -I p TA !' v _- R -I R -II P[ R -II G .F R-11 33 R-1' J R -II _ .4i•"r�P d• I: _L ,�,:- — R41� . R -II L . .I — `� —vpO5EM0 APPLE ../VALLEY I r• �� ij 7 Yti-`ilk �� �I F•- ...-:.i•. j: E, .. B _ R -II ':c i"":: lig >'•-.i. i I ` R -IR R -III R-1is.�1: ==i-.�" R-11 CSC/GB -' L.:ry--rLXJ. z. .Wr LB FR -III LB • �1- \f+.� �._:� CSC - �R-Fj'.; °`' �'. .,.I ) •- RB LB Gf% R -I P '.Li •ih•° R-1) r -'• 5m SLB R -I L R -I p TA !' v _- R -I R -II P[ R -II G .F R-11 33 R-1' J R -II _ .4i•"r�P d• I: _L ,�,:- — R41� . R -II L . .I — `� —vpO5EM0 APPLE ../VALLEY I r• �� ij • MEMO TO: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 18, 1984 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON MICHAEL CONSTRUCTION, INC., PRELIMINARY PLAT, HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 This application began the planning process in November, 1983, and the Advisory Planning Commission continued this preliminary plat again at the December 15, 1983 meeting for additional information. At that meeting, the Planning Commission requested that a traffic study be done to determine that the road proposed will handle the additional traffic for the 112 dwelling units. With that, the ap- plicants hired Westwood Planning and Engineering Company to do a traffic analysis of the proposed project. Attached to this memor- andum are the findings of the traffic engineer in regard to this project and its effect on the surrounding road system. In a short analysis, it appears that the proposed road specifications would be more than adequate to handle the additional 112 dwelling units in this proposed project. The issue in regard to the proposed road is whether the road should be a public or private street. In review of this, it appears that • the applicant is requesting that the road be designed to the same specifications as a public street but remain in the homeowner's association for maintenance and upkeep. With the road being a pri- vate road, the setbacks are less than what would be required if the road would be a public street running through this proposed project. That is the main reason the applicant is proposing a private street vs. a public street. If the road were to be a public street, then additional setbacks would have to be met from the right-of-way of the proposed street going through the proposed project. If the private street were allowed, the house or dwelling units could be set back 46' from centerline of the proposed road vs. the public street requiring a minimum setback of 75' from centerline or an ad- ditional 29' of setback. In review of this particular site, the configuration and layout of the site is very narrow, and to make the site work, the applicant is proposing the least amount of setback as possible. As you are aware, they are already proposing to go right to the property line abutting 35E in order to get adequate width to develop the proper- ty. Therefore, the applicant is trying to do everything possible to increase the width by reducing setbacks wherever possible to make the project a feasible development. As you can see from the proposed plan, the development is a lower intensity or lower scale of townhouse -style density where living quarters would be a maxi- mum of 2�-stories in height vs. what could be allowed on the multi- ple site of 3 stories plus. Therefore, the applicant is keeping • the intent of the neighborhood by proposing to construct this one story type of development needing more ground area than if the IS -4 CITY OF EAGAN UPDATE ON HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 • JANUARY 18, 1984 PAGE TWO development were a multiple project of multiple stories. In review of this particular development proposal, the applicant is proposing to construct 112 dwelling units on 12.5 gross acres with a gross density of 8.9 dwelling units per acre. In deducting road right-of-way for either a private street or a public street, the net acres would be between 11.3 and 10.4 net acres. In calculating the net density, it appears that the development would be between 10 and 11 dwelling units per acre which would be at the very low end of the multiple density approved on the site. In review of the lot coverage, the lot coverage differs from gross acre to net with the lot coverage on the gross acre being approximately 18.98 and on the net deducting a public street approximately 218-21.58 which is slightly over the maximum lot coverage allowed. Again, in review- ing this particular plan, it appears that the applicant is propos- ing to construct more of a townhouse/garden apartment -style dwell- ing unit vs. the more standard higher density multiple unit which normally is developed in an R-4 District. In calculating what :the number of units which could be allowed within this development pro- posal on a net basis, the dwelling units could range approximately 165 and calculating 15 dwelling units'an-adre on 11 net acres, or an additional 53 dwelling units which is one half again what is • being proposed in this particular development request. In review of this project, it appears that the trade-off the Com- mission will have to review to allow the lower density would be in granting the setback variance from 35E and setback variances from the internal street if determined a public street is required to allow this lower density. If the Commission decides not to grant any variance, this whole development plan proposed will have to be redesigned and a different type of dwelling unit proposed in order to fit the constraints of this site in regard to setbacks. What this would mean would be the development would go vertical into two to three-story buildings to get the density allowed on the site which has been granted through zoning vs. trying to obtain some type of lower density on a lineal scale or townhouse -style of development. Therefore, in review of this proposal, there are trade-offs in re- gard to the type of development the City wants to have in this par- ticular area, whether it be the lower density as proposed or deny this request and suggest that the applicant meet all zoning and set- back criteria and propose a higher density development proposal. The last item staff would like to mention is in regard to the en- vironmental assessment review. Staff was asked what the require- ments are for an environmental assessment worksheet for this pro- ject. Since the December 15th meeting, staff has been in contact • with the neighborhood to inform them as to what process they would have to go through to initiate the petition to require an environ- mental assessment worksheet review. In this process, it appears S7 CITY OF EAGAN • UPDATE ON HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 JANUARY 18, 1984 41 PAGE THREE that the neighborhood or homeowner's association can petition the Environmental Quality Board to check to see if the proposed project meets any of the mandatory categories requiring an environmental assessment review. The Environmental Quality Board would then con- tact the City of Eagan, and they would determine that Eagan is the regulatory government agency which would be in charge to determine if an environmental assessment worksheet would be needed or not. In the past, the City of Eagan has not required an environmental assessment worksheet if a project did not meet any of the mandatory categories requiring a worksheet to be done. In fact, this is the case with this particular project; the project is small where none of the items proposed in this project would meet the mandatory cat- egories in the regulations for an environmental assessment review. Therefore, in the beginning, City staff did not require the devel- oper to start the process of an environmental assessment worksheet. The City Council does have the right, however, through the discre- tion process, to determine that an environmental assessment work- sheet may or may not be needed even though the project does not meet the mandatory categories. If the Planning Commission elects to approve the site plan and de- velopment proposal submitted at this particular time, the commis- sion should: 1) Accept the variances in regard to setback from 35E rights-of- way. 2) A minimum of a 25' setback be required from the back of the curb up to any dwelling unit or portion of dwelling unit in the development project. 3) A lot coverage variance of approximately 1%-2% would have to be granted for this particular development proposal. 4) A building setback variance will have to be approved by the City along the I -35E boundaries in order to permit structures at a zero lot setback where a minimum of 50 feet is required. Also, a variance will have to be approved, as well as an agreement obtained from MnDOT, to permit parking as proposed over the I -35E boundary where a minimum of 20 feet is requir- ed by City Code. 5) A private street loop should be provided on proposed Lot 1 rather than a long, dead-end private street. 6) Concrete curbs shall be provided along the perimeter of all driving surfaces. • 7) If individual units are to be sold, the developer shall pro- vide a revised lot and block plan. In any instance, the de- veloper shall provide a phasing plan. m CITY OF EAGAN UPDATE ON HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 • JANUARY 18, 1984 PAGE FOUR 8) The City attorney shall review the proposed Articles of In- corporation of the Homeowner's Association to insure that proper access to a public street will be guaranteed for all properties and that the Association will maintain the pri- vate streets. 9) If the petitioner is requesting a model home and sales of- fice, this shall be so designated as a part of the approval by the City with any appropriate conditions related thereto. 10) Park dedication shall be satisfied in a manner determined by the City Council after review by the Eagan Park Committee. 11) A landscape plan shall be submitted for review by the City staff and approval by the City Council with the approval of the final plat. The landscape plan, 'through vegetative screens and berming, shall provide additional noise atten- uation related to I -35E where necessary and practical. ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS 12) If installed privately, plans and specifications for utili- • ty and street construction shall be prepared by a register- ed engineer and submitted to the Engineering Department for approval. 13) The private drives in Meadowlark Road should form a "T" in- . '-tersection. 14) The existing right-of-way must be vacated prior to final plat approval. 15) Easements shall be dedicated as required. 16) This proposed development shall be responsible for trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 17) All costs associated with installing public improvements and private streets shall be the sole responsibility of this de- velopment. 18) Private streets shall be 28' wide and have concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing. 19) No dead-end lateral water mains will be -allowed. 1] W • MEMO TO: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COtiLMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER ` FROM: RICHARD M. HEFTI, ASSISTANT'CITY ENGINEER DATE: JANUARY 18, 1984 SUBJECT: HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT Staff has reviewed the traffic study prepared by Mr. Kenneth W. Ander- son of Westwood Planning and Engineering Company on January 5, 1984 and would like to comment on the recommendations and justify staff's position to maintain this proposed access road as a publicly -dedicated street. First, staff was in general concurrence with all findings and recom- mendations of the above referenced report. The sole exception is that staff believes it would be in the best interests of the City to maintain the proposed access road as a publicly -dedicated street rather than a privately owned street. One advantage to the City in maintaining this access road as a publicly -dedicated street is main- tenance. As a City street, the City would be able to control the maintenance of the street by insuring preventive maintenance, such as sealcoating being performed at proper intervals. Also, if this access road is a City street, then should repairs be required, the • City would be obligated to perform this work when it is necessary. On the other hand, if this was a private drive, the City would have no authority to insure the street is properly maintained, that is to say that proper sealcoating intervals are observed and any street repair performed immediately and not dependent upon the association's budget. In addition, winter maintenance would also pose a problem. with City snowplows having to stop and turn around at the end of Mea- dowlark Road. It would be much more efficient to continue around the proposed access street to Blackhawk Road. Furthermore, because pri- vate snow removing contractors can perform snowplowing operations at a much earlier time than City crews, since their snow removing re- sponsibilities are minuscule compared to that of the City crews, staff is concerned with increased complaints from residents along Meadowlark Lane questioning why the private road was snowplowed be- fore a City street. This area is already a problem area due to its lower priority on the snowplowing list since it is a dead-end street and because internal parking problems with the existing townhouse de- velopment necessitates some residents parking along Meadowlark Road. Finally, dedicating the proposed access road as a City street would improve the continuity of Meadowlark Road by creating a looped street back into Blackhawk Road thereby fulfilling the original concept of a looped public street as platted with the Hillandale Addition No. 1. In another matter regarding this proposed development, it is staff's understanding that adequate setback could be acquired adjacent the • I -35E exit ramp. MnDOT has indicated that upon completion of the berm adjacent this proposed development, they would construct their fence on the top of the berm and turn back the additional right-of-way ENGINEERING REPORT HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 JANUARY 18, 1984 • PAGE TWO from their fence to the existing property line to the developer. This would result in approximately a 60-70 foot buffer area. It is also staff's understanding that the reason MnDOT purchased additional right- of-way from this parcel is that easements could not be negotiated for construction of a berm required between the I -35E ramp and this parcel. Subsequently, staff would recommend the developer pursue obtaining this excess right-of-way from MnDOT as a condition offinalplat ap- proval. Otherwise, if the fence is installed at the current roadway lines, there would not be enough room for emergency vehicles to circle behind the easterly edges of these proposed. townhouses. I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report addendum in detail with the Advisory Planning Commission at their meeting of Jan- uary 24, 1984. Respectfully submitted, ��O'6 Richard M. Hefti, P.E. Assistant City Engineer` ` RMH/jach 61 • • MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR • FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1984 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT CONSIDERATION - HILLANDALE ADDITION $2 At the Planning Commission meeting of January 24, there was considerable discussion pertaining to a publicly dedicated street versus private street built to City standards. The major concern that the Public Works Department has pertains to continuity of thoroughfare patterns. When the Hillandale Addition was originally presented as a preliminary plat, it proposed a thorough- fare plan which had an internal loop street connecting to Blackhawk Road at two locations. This street was to be .a public right- of-way. When the first phase of development occurred, Meadowlark Road was constructed and dedicated as a public street. Due to the fact that it was constructed without the standard cul de sac or an adequate turn around, the City has experienced problems in providing satisfactory snow removal services on Meadowlark Road. Subsequently, the Engineering Division recommended that this future road connection through the second addition be a publicly dedicated street which would facilitate snow removal operations. . To have this looped street segmented into a portion under private jurisdiction with Meadowlark Road remaining under public jurisdic- tion would not solve the current problems and could possibly create future problems due to the ability of the private or City crews providing snow removal prior to the other. In addition, we are starting to receive some complaints from homeowners and their associations who feel that they are not getting an equal amount of City service for comparable taxes paid. In addition, certain associations are requesting that private streets be turned back to the City for perpetual maintenance due to their inability to effectively control their street maintenance with their limited funds and resources. Taking these problems into consideration, I would like to strongly encourage the City Council to try and maintain continuity in the development of this area through either requiring the continuation of a publicly dedicated looped street or, as an alternative allow the private street installation with the condition that the existing right-of-way from Meadowlark Road be vacated and all maintenance responsibility revert to the homeowner association. An additional concern that should be considered relates to the lack of traffic enforcement that can be performed by the police department on private dedicated streets. This could possibly be a detriment in this particular situation where this private street will act as a looped thoroughfare via an extension of Meadowlark Road to Blackhawk Road. C7� Director of Public Works 63L TAC/kf 0 • WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY January 5, 1984 Mr. Michael N. Monson Michael Construction 14560 Martin Dryve Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Lakewood Townhomes of Eagan Dear Mr. Monson: At your request, we have evaluated the Lakewood townhouse development to determine projected traffic movements generated by the proposed new housing units and to evaluate the proposed road system in relationship to this traffic. On llednesday, January 4, 1984, I met with Rich Hesti, Assistant City Engineer, and discussed the city's standards for road construction. Mr. Hesti stated that a 32 foot wide city street using a MnDOT Standard -B-412 curb and gutter section (as shown on the attached sketch) will meet the city's standards. This design will accommodate two-way traffic and will provide sufficient width to pass a stalled vehicle. If the'homeowner's association would ever default on street maintenance, this design is compatible with other streets and could be maintained by city forces. Mr. Hesti suggested that 35 foot radius returns be used at intersections, as shown on the attached sketches. We recommend that Meadowlark Road be connected with the private road serving Lakewood Townhomes. This will facilitate circulation movement for garbage collection, police surveillance, and other municipal service functions, as well as providing optional access points in case of street blockages or other unusual events. The attached sketch shows a design which will encourage residents from Lakewood Townhomes to remain on the development street rather than turning to Meadowlark Road for access to Blackhawk Road. ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION Meadowlark Road presently serves 100 townhomes units and the proposes' Lake- wood development will add an additional 112 units. Thirty-nine of Lakewood's units will be located east of the Meadowlark Road intersection with the remaining 73 units located to the south. Based on trip generation factors from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, MnDOT, and from studies by llestwood Planning & Engineering, we anticipate 790 daily trips from the existing development, plus 885 trips from Lakewood townhomes. The following hourly trip distributions are anticipated during the morning and evening rush hours: 7115 WAYZATA BOULEVARD• MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55120 161b 5460155 �� Mr. Michael N. Ronson January 5, 1984 Page 2 Inbound Traffic Outbound Traffic Morning rush hour 96 100 Evening rush hour 108 78 Anticipated distribution of these trips between the Meadowlark Road inter- section and the.Lakewood Townhomes intersection is shown on the attached Traffic Flow Plan. Distribution of trips is based on the following para- meters: • 90% of the traffic entering or leaving this development area will be oriented to or from the south on Blackhawk Road • All traffic from the existing development will utilize Meadowlark Road to reach Blackhawk Road • All traffic from the 39 proposed new units north of Meadowlark Road, with destinations or origins north of this area, will use Meadowlark Road to reach Blackhawk Road (31 vehicles per day) • • 600 of the trips from these 39 units, with origins or destinations south of the site, will'use Meadowlark Road to reach Blackhawk Road (166 vehicles per day) 0 • All trips from the 73 proposed dwelling units south of the Meadowlark Road intersection will utilize the new road to reach Blackhawk Road The above assumptions are based on travel time, relative distances and anti- cipated origin/destination movements involving use of I -35E and other major traffic arteries. No distribution factor was assumed to compare the new road with Meadowlark Road based on driver friction. Driver friction could be caused by delays at intersections with Blackhawk Road, vehicle parking or snow removal policies which would restrict either Meadowlark Road or the new road because of limited width or sight distance, and a general per- ception by the vehicle operator of safety and convenience. If congestion were to occur on either of these roads, some shift of volumes from one intersection to another might be encountered. The attached Traffic Flow Plan shows anticipated traffic movements during peak hours. Peak activity will occur during the morning rush hour and the heaviest flow of traffic during the morning peak will be the left turn from Meadowlark Road to Blackhavk Road, with 52 vehicles per hour. Traffic from the new development will contribute approximately 10 of these 52 vehicles with the remaining 42 vehicles generated from existing development. During the evening rush hour, a right turn movement from Blackhawk Road to Meadowlark Road is anticipated to carry 58 vehicles per hour, with 11 vehi- cles continuing through to the new tovnhomes and 47 vehicles attracted to • existing development. 6* Mr. Michael N. Monson • January 5, 1984 Page 3 M Based on these assumed traffic movements, the city should experience no measurable delay or congestion because of traffic flow from these resi- dential developments. The physical layout of Lakewood Townhomes and the presence of I -35E right-of-way will restrict further development. There- fore, we do not anticipate any additional traffic generation or other factors which would require provision of higher level streets. The city's standard, 32 foot wide streets should comfortably accommodate traffic movements from these developments. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the above factors, we recommend the following measures: • The Lakewood Townhomes access road be constructed as a privately owned municipal street, constructed to a 32 foot width, meeting City of Eagan design standards. • Meadowlark Road should be connected, as shown on the sketch, to allow traffic from the existing townhouses access and circulation through the site. • On the basis of this -design, the street should function in a manner • similar to other residential streets, with no unusual safety hazards, maintenance problems, or anticipated traffic congestion. • The intersection of this road with Blackhawk Road and the intersec- tion of Meadowlark Road with Blackhawk Road should function with virtually no congestion or delay during peak periods. The existing alignment and design of Blackhawk Road should accommodate these traffic volumes without restricting safety or capacity. • Design of the proposed new road intersection with Meadowlark Road will encourage.traffic from Lakewood Townhomes to remain on their street, rather than'traveling through the existing development. Stop signs should not be necessary to control traffic at this intersection, since volumes will be very light and traffic from the new develop- ment to Meadowlark Road is minimal. Based on the above design parameters, the proposed new street will function as a private road, meeting all municipal standards for design, maintenance and operation. Yours truly, WESTWOOD PLANNING h EN'GIN�EEEERIING� COMPANY • Kenneth W. Anderson, P.E. KWA/dg TRAFFIC FLOW PLAN 00/00 AM/PM iPARK. PRO x/80 MEADOWLARK' Roan D 00D PLANNING a ENGINEER NG COM ANY 751S WATLTA BOULEVARD. MINNEAVOSIE. MN. 161]6($12)SA04DISS remI L-AKEW.00D- TOWN OMES - • •. 0 • 0 P� �O 3� 3d R 1 END CURB AND GUTTER AT PROPERTY LINE. `3 _ / • / Y .-'STREET SECTION "-)- (NO SCALE) 3 41 321 - - -- - - 30, D4-12 CURB AND GUTTER ENGIN EERNO COMPANY 7415 wATUTA SOULEV"D. YINkEAPOLR YN. MM (8117 6Y01Y LAKEWOOD _. - TOWNHOMES ; __-- .- ail MEADOWLARK ROAD 1 ' 332 R 35R r 3WR 35'R 32' w - � .-._LAKEWOOD �, WESTWOOD PLANNING b ENGINEERING COMPANY _---0 W N H O" E S 7411 WAYZATA /OOMAX0. MINNEA10LM MN. 1343101X34-0133 5 RECEIVED JAN Ellen Mosher Athletics, Inc. Post Office Box 14310, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414. Phone (612) 452-3680 • • • January 20, 1984 Mr. Chuck Hall Chairman, Advisory Planning Committee c/o Tom Hedges Eagan City Manager 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN. 55122 Dear Mr: Hall, I wanted to take this opportunity to express my opinion as an owner -resident of Meadowlark Ridge Homeowners Association. It is my understanding that the adjoining property has been zoned a high density area and that there is a development plan that has been brought before the Eagan city planner that proposes a 112 unit townhouse project. I also understand that there could be as many as over 200 apartment units that could be built in this area. As a resident, I feel that it would to favor the plan that would guarantee a townhouse units with the lowest density with the tremendous growth in the Eagan be developed in the very near future. As the appreciation value of my unit, I wou that we push to accept the proposed plan 3W4 be in our best interest majority of owner -occupied possible. I feel that area, this land will surely an owner interested in ld definitely recommend rather than try to delay the inevitable and risk ending up with a very high density rental apartment unit that would adjoin our property. Thank you for the consideration of my opinion. I hope that you will share it with the other membees of your committee. Sincerely, Ellen Mosher 1782 Meadowlark Road 51 January 24, 1984 Advisory Planning Commission City of Eagan Eagan, Minn. Dear Advisory Planning Commission: As a homeowner and resident of a Meadowlark Ridge Townhcme I have seriously assessed the implications of the proposed Lakewood Townhone project. The analysis was done first as a homeowner and second as a Realtor. In my personal and professional opinion I feel the proposed project will be a valuable asset to the neighborhood. I don't believe there would be any traffic or safety problems resulting from the private road connecting Meadowlark Rd. with Blackhawk Road. I do feel the project will increase the value of our property • especially with the lower density proposal and the design of the project. Addressing the original position paper submitted to the City of Eagan, a number of the homeowners feel the paper was submitted on behalf of a group of individual homeowners and not a true representation of the association as a whole. Because of this I personally circulated a petition for the support of the project to determine the feelings of the individual homeowners. I spoke with only 2 homeowners who where opposed to the proposal and one undecided. The rest of'the hamowners I contacted supported the proposal. Attached is the. petition which was circulated. I ask the Commission to consider the petition signed by individual homeowners. This is evidence of support for the Lakewood Townhcme proposal and approval by the Commission for the preliminary plat. Thank you, ,�ta„uu �%iLat,d�Cc�,J Reenie Madden 4095 Meadowlark Court Eagan, Minn. 0 70 PETITION TO EAGAN CITY ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: MEADOWLARK RIDGE TOWNHOME OWNERS • RE: LAKEWOOD TOWNHOME PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 We, the undersigned, are Meadowlark Ridge Townhome owners and occupiers in Eagan, Minnesota. We are aware of the preliminary plat application submitted by Gensmer Companies, Inc. and Michael Construction for construction of 112 townhouse units on the property located adjacent to our townhouse project. It is our belief that the development project as submitted would be a valuable asset to the neighborhood. The project's low density together with its design would increase the value of our homes. We do not believe that there would be any traffic or safety problem caused by the project's private road connecting to Meadowlark Rd. and Blackhawk Rd. We therefore support the application for the project, and hence do not agree with the "Position Paper to the City of Eagan" dated November 22, 1983 submitted to the City of Eagan by the two presidents of the homeowners associations # 1 and # 2. Thank you. Name Date Address �,� U/i�-d..ti.,.� i- /9- P5/ �a9�i�A�u��-�-. Com• �..� ie« L • _,- -�ar� / — a o - O �/ f� `i f`' //l{�a��sc�� Irk p �-� � �n�rv�f.J 1 - 3� - 8 `l `�0 5'7 n%egd•..v li�rCi��-F, (_22-8y (-)60 /1`�� fit.,;:/�•�r �7 7/ Page 2 Petition to City of Eagan • Name �[?� Date • • 71 Address • • �.FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION RE: • •Y PAINS REMEATION CU44ISSICN AMON HILLANDALE ADDITION The Advisory Parks and Recreation Conmuission at its regular meeting on December 1, 1983 reviewed the proposed Hillandale Addition #2. After review of the caumission of the proposed addition, the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission moved to recommend to the City Council that a cash dedication requxsement be made. Further, that staff worked with the developer to determine whether a tot lot was suitable for the site. If such a tot lot could be worked into the site, it was recommended that such a play area be included as a requirement of the park dedication. cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner Toim Colbert, Director of Public Works Paul Hauge, City Attorney 73 APC Minutes 46 January 24, 1984 is Secretary. McCrea moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion that Doris Wilkins be the Secretary for 1984. Wold moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to close the nominations and cast unanimous ballot for Doris Wilkins. All voted in favor. Assessment Committee. Garrett Mulrooney volunteered to be a member of the Eagan Assessment Committee for 1984 and the Chairman appointed him to the Committee. Planning Commission Meeting Procedures. Chairman Hall reviewed the procedures for Planning Commission meetings with the commission members and with all persons present at the meeting. MINUTES December 15, 1983 _ Regular Meeting. Upon motion by Wilkins, seconded McCrea, it was resolved that the minutes of the December 15, 1983 meeting be approved as distributed. All voted in favor eXcept Krob who abstained, indi- cating he was not present at the meeting. RILLANDALB ADDITION 90. 2 - PRELIMNARY PLAT The continued hearing regarding the application of Michael Construction, Inc. for preliminary plat approval of Hillandale Addition No. 2 consisting of 12.58 acres and containing approximately 112 dwelling units located in parts of Lot 2, Block 1, Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Lot 2, -Block 2 and Outlot A, Hillandale No. 1 in Section 20 was then convened by Chairman Hall. The application was first presented to the Planning Commission in November, 1983 and additional. information was requested, including traffic information, which has now been submitted by Westwood Planning h Engineering Company. It appears from the information that the proposed road specifications would be adequate to handle the additional 112 dwelling units in the proposed project. Dale Runkle reviewed the information that had been submitted, and further stated that another question that arose was whether the streets should be public or private. The setbacks would not be sufficient under the proposed plan if public right-of-way were required and thus the reason for the request for private right-of-way, but the developers do agree to install the streets with public street construction standards. In addition, the proposal is to build to the property line of I -35E in order to get adequate width to develop the property. It was noted there would be a gross density of 8.9 dwelling units per acre. Mr. Runkle noted the trade offs in regard to the type of develop- ment the City wants to have in the area, whether it be lower density or higher density in the event that the variances are not granted, are issues that the Planning Commission must decide. Mr. Hall stated that three letters have been 2 74 APC Minutes • January 24, 1964 submitted to the City, including one from the Minnesota Department of Trans- portation regarding location of the fence along I -35E and two letters, with a petition in support of the project. Mr. Runkle also stated that the proposed project does not meet the mandatory requirements for an EAw but the City could, in its discretion, require'the worksheet. A new diagram showing the area that would be taken for public street was displayed and Greg Du'Monceaux, the architect, appeared for the applicant and stated that if the project is not approved, the only other alternate for development would be an apartment type project. Karen Jensen, President of Meadowlark Homeowners Association No. 1 stated that her Association was opposed to apartment buildings and recommended a private street be installed. Jeff Johnson, a neighbor, stated that he was not opposed and had questions including whether a development contract would be entered into and whether the proposed plan will, in fact, be carried out. He also stated the neighboring owners wanted to be informed of the progress of the development, including whether any special signing or speed limits would be provided on ,the private streets. He stated the neigh- boring owners would prefer owner -occupied property but it was noted the City had no direct 'control over that type of provision. Member Krob had concerns about setbacks from streets and parking, but it was noted that parking does • exceed the minimum city requirements. Member McCrea recommended the Minnesota Department of Transportation letter concerning moving the fence be part of the Development Agreement including maintenance of the property along the fence. Doris Wilkins recommended a public street to be looped through the development and the developer indicated that he would prefer a private street. Mr. Du'Monceaux stated that it was his opinion that the Homeowners Association would have greater control with lower maximum speeds in the event of a private street, and further stated that there would be two phases over approximately two years. Member Krob moved, McCrea seconded the motion. to recommend approval of the application pursuant to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the variances in regard to setback from I -35E rights -of - way. 2. The Homeowners Association shall maintain the area between I -35E fence and the adjacent buildings which lies partially on MnDOT right-of-way. 3. A minimum of a 25 foot setback shall be required from the back of the curb to any dwelling unit or portion of dwelling unit in the development project. 4. A lot coverage variance not to exceed 2% shall be granted for the development. 5. A building setback variance shall be approved by the City along the I -35E boundaries in order to permit structures at a zero lot setback where a minimum of 50 feet is required. 3 7S APC Minutes 19 January 24, 1984 6. A private street loop shall be provided on proposed Lot 1 rather than a long, dead-end private street. 7. Concrete curbs shall be provided along the perimeter of all driving surfaces. 8. If individual units are to be sold, the developer shall provide a revised lot and.block plan. In any instance, the developer shall provide a phasing plan. 9. The City attorney shall reviewandapprove the proposed Articles of Incorporation, By -Laws and Restrictions of the Homeowners Association.to insure that proper access to a public street will be guaranteed for all properties and that the Association will maintain the private streets. 10. If the petitioner is requesting a model home and sales office, this shall be so designated as a part of the approval by the City with any appro- priate conditions related thereto. 11. Park dedication shall be satisfied in a manner determined by the • City Council after review by the Eagan Park Committee. 12. A landscape plan shall be submitted for review by the City staff and approval by the City Council with the approval of the final plat and the existing two Homeowners Associations shall review the plan. The landscape plan, through vegetative screens and berming, shall provide additional noise attenuation related to I -35E where necessary and practical. 13. If installed privately, plans and specifications for utility and street construction shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted ' to the Engineering Department for approval. 14. The private drives on Meadowlark Road shall form an intersection according to the eingeering plans approved by the City. 15. The existing right-of-way shall be vacated prior to final plat approval. 16. Easements shall be dedicated as required by the City. 17. This proposed development shall be responsible for trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 18. All costs associated with installing public improvements and private streets shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 19. Private streets shall be 32 feet wide and have concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing according to City standards. 4 '7(9 APC Minutes January 24, 1984 20. No dead-end lateral water mains will be allowed.` _ tel. � - � v-� �a.� , v=..'A1+` S� o� � i..�++•�, ac o �jv`^^'��j` 'C Mr. Mulrooney recommended that public right-of-way be provided based upon the reasons outlined by the Engineering staff, including more control over maintenance, police and fire protection and general public safety. Those in favor were McCrea, Hall, Krob and Wold; against were Wilkins, Mulrooney and Merkley. Member Mulrooney stated the only reason he voted against the motion was he favored the public right-of-way in the project, and otherwise favored the proposal. THE RENTAL PLACE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The hearing egarding the application of Larry D. Peders for condi- tional use permit r The Rental Place for a pylon sign on of 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Additi\Ki onvened by Chairman Hall. Dal Runkle outlined the proposal and indthat the conditional use perm had been granted for outside storage location of a rental busin s on the lot, and it appeared that the psign would meet all th criteria of the sign ordinance including of spacing from 'the isting Kinney Shoe Sign. Contact had been madi ey Shoe but no det mination as to removal of the sign had yet beenMr. edersen was -pre ent and stated that he would comply with the 300acin Mulroone moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommendl of a applic ion, subject to the following conditions: I. All of the conditions regards the Sign Ordinance shall be adhered to regarding height, size and distance m other pylon signs. 2. The sign shall be renewe yearl\vkmRimANd� nce with the Sign Ordi- nance. All voted in favor. G 8, MIRIAM NAL The hearing regding the application of George 'A d Miriam Nall for a variance for the k ping of horses on a 4 1/2 acre pare of land zoned R-1 located at 3960 P of Knob Road was next convened. Dale nkle detailed the application and oted that the applicant now is requesting that 5 horses be stabled on the roperty. A sketch showing the proposed fenced area on the north proper line and a shed to the rear that would house the horses was reviewed by he Planning Commission. Alice and Ted Bolke were present and asked ques ons about the sheltering of horses and also the storage of numer- ous older cars on the east area of the property. Mrs. Nall stated the plan 5 �% Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Fifteen AMENDMENT/LEXINGTON SOUTH PUD B. Lexington South Inc., Jim Curry, for an Admendment to the Lexington South Planned Development to Exchange Land Uses on Two Parcels Within the Lexington South PUD -- A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on January 24, 1984, to consider an application submitted by Jim Curry for an amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development to exchanGe uses on two parcels within. the Lexington South PUD. T' he Adand visory Planning Commission is recommending ao� vel of the amendment to the planned development subject to conditions listed in the staff report. For a copy of the Planner's report addressing the amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development, refer to pages? 9 ^through !903 . For a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission minutes regarding action on this agenda item, refer to page(s) 2!j - ACTION 4 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development as requested by Lexington South Inc. • • • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: JAMES CURRY LOCATION: W' OF THE Wig OF SECTION 23, PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF THE LEXINGTON SOUTH PUD EXISTING ZONING: R -II (MIXED RESIDENTIAL) WITH A DENSITY OF 3-6 DWG.UNITS/ACRE & R-III(MIXED RESIDENTIAL) 6-12 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 24, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 18, 1984 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a transfer of density from Parcel 2 to Parcel 3 of the Lexington South Planned Development, and conversely the transfer of density from Par- cel 3 to Parcel 2 in the Lexington South Planned Development located south of Wescott Road and east of Lexington Avenue, Section 23. COMMENTS • In review of the Lexington South Planned Development agreement, Exhi- bit "D" which designates the land use within the Lexington South Plan- ned Development indicates where the applicant is requesting to trans- fer or shift densities on two parcels within the Lexington South Plan- ned Development. Presently, Parcel 2 has an R -III land use or densi- ty approved which would allow 6-12 dwelling units per acre. The ap- plicant, at this time, is requesting to transfer this R -III density to Parcel 3 which presently has an R -II (Mixed Residential) with a density of 3-6 dwelling .units per acre and to transfer the R -II from Parcel 3 to Parcel 2 which was originally R -III. The net result, in looking at acreages and uses, is as follows on a small matrix that was put together to try to explain this change in uses: • 79 PRESENT AVERAGE DWG.UNITS TOTAL DWG. PARCEL LAND USE PER ACRE ACRES UNITS 2 R -III 9 132 1,188 3 R -II 4.5 40 180 1,368 PROPOSED CHANGE 2 R -II 4 132 528 3 R -III 12 40 480 1,008 79 CITY OF EAGAN AMENDMENT TO THE LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT • JANUARY 24,-1984 PAGE TWO Total development potential in this amended plan would consist of 1,008 dwelling units or a reduction of 360.dwelling units from what was originally approved in 1977. Therefore, the applicant is requesting that this revision be grant- ed for the following reasons: 1) The reduction in density. 2) In reviewing the surrounding land uses, there would be more of a transition in this development proposal from the 132 acres located in the southwest quadrant of Wescott Road and Lexington Avenue. 3) Parcel 2 would be designated R -II, Parcel 3 would be desig- nated R-IIIand the parcel south of Parcel 3 R -IV thereby making for more of a transitional development than going from an R -III to an R -II to an R -IV. Therefore, the transi- tion is much better in the proposed revision than what was originally approved in 1977. The last item staff would like to point out in regard to this propos- • ed change is in regard to the topographic features of this develop- ment proposal. Parcel 2 presently is fairly flat, open and rolling and would be much more conducive to the R -II (3-6 dwelling units per acre). It is staff's understanding that plans are being looked at to convert this to some type of single family duplex development vs. the townhouse or multiple which had been originally approved. In reviewing Parcel 3 containing 40 acres, the topography is quite scattered throughout the 40 -acre site working more with the topogra- phic restraints than what a lower density or residential character could provide for this proposal. When City staff received this request to change this to an R -III, staff wanted to make sure that a development plan could work showing the proposed increase in density and -how it would relate to the site and development of this parcel. With this, the applicant has provid- ed a site plan showing 25 multiple dwelling buildings varying from 15 dwelling units to 36 dwelling units each for a total development of 447 dwelling units. There appears to be adequate room to place the proposed buildings and parking areas on the site and have ade- quate green and open space surrounding this development proposal. Thus, in the sketch plan showing how the development works, it ap- pears that it can handle the additional units even though the topogra- phy is more severe than where it was originally proposed. Attached is a site plan showing how the transfer or increase in den- • sity would work on Parcel 3 for your review. .6 •CITY OF EAGAN AMENDMENT TO THE LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT JANUARY 24, 1984 PAGE THREE • 1-1 L If this amendment is approved, it should be subject to the following conditions: 1) An amendment be initiated and the land use exhibits changed in the Lexington South Planned Development agreement. 2) The densities be spelled out where Parcel 3 would be allow- ed to be transferred to an R -II land use with a maximum density of 528 dwelling units and that Parcel 3 have a land use of R -III (6-12 dwelling units) with no more than 480 total dwelling units approved on the overall site. DCR/jack II l s ► 11 � _►:. �.,:�; � @ y y Y � ' '� III y t t■ • O li n u a u d E — r � �ry06tD �I q 88 At is � •" .. ,' -. � J .�-- ' � 7 � I -. .� - • , • ..t� I I ;/ ,rye � -, I � 1 � w I •/� '�• 1 I _�\ II 4-VI� lit -~f' :. ��! ._ ,•�•.: �J� :.�. i, �.r '-r- �:. '1i. �:y.w�'•,' - .. _.- ...._:��'_; �'c rim, r .�.. r ;1/� 1 �.: N ✓�"� � �I /.� � •' I I • I I ■�1N■ MINIM% •k L •}f�� i:.•_ ' • .}:',`::.} v L.} h{f rtf�j :'i{ �I ti•1..� . •`.]�• .1:4yyJL.••�{{ti4Y vrr •L f�-0( �N �. 4 li •�' 14 �}�Ln V. ' kW r • • 1 til-}�JyL y.}{.L.4; ;y }y'•�,fRR• �'l•l • M.{�:r,•;{"'l•:;: n. r fir•}lf.�.�:• ti}'{�•: LLL .� :•y �, � x: l V.ir...lf l$ �{'[yll'.';•:l: 44 :.. {{y}:; •!r' $� ,,yam{{,':41} 4.{kl1' '•V .l{{.11ll;.V{ • }: ff.; p L P I. . i APC Minutes . January 24, 1984 ::ii , 1'''. .. 1 The hearing concerning the application of James Curry for amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development to transfer densities from R-2 (Mixed Residential Densities) and R-3 (Mixed Residential Densities) on two parcels east of Lexington Avenue and north of County Road #30 (Diffley Road) was next heard. Mr. Runkle explained the application and noted that the total dwelling units, according to minimum standards would be reduced from 1,368 to 1,008 units under the proposal. Jim Curry and Bruce Patterson of Suburban Engi- neering were present. Mr. Patterson reviewed some topographic constraints resulting in the amendment request and showed three concepts reflecting density and a fourth showing multiples with 12 to 36 units per building. A number of neighboring owners were present with questions but no objections. The transition, according to the plan, would provide for R-2 to R-3 to R-4 as proposed. It was also requested that the Planned Development Agreement be revised to limit the specific number of units that would be permitted per parcel and that there be no shifting of densities in the future. Chairman Hall stated that the potential for development -would be about 1,764 units and . the reduction would be to about 1,140 units if the maximum allowable were granted. McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: n U 1. An amendment shall be initiated and the land use exhibits changed in the Lexington South. Planned Development Agreement. 2. The densities shall be spelled out where Parcel 3 would be allowed to be transferred to an R -II land use with a maximum density of 528 dwelling units and that Parcel 3 have a land use of R -III (6-12 dwelling units) with no more than 480 total dwelling units approved on the overall site. It was also recommended that the owners of the parcels noted as excep- tions, should continue to monitor the development and attempt to provide for tie-ins of their parcels to future development. All voted in favor except Hall who abstained.. 7 $4 C -I J Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Sixteen PRELIMINARY PLAT/THE PINES C. Roger Kreidberg, RLK Corporation, for a Preliminary Plat, The Pines, Consisting of Approximately 3.65 Acres Containing 26 Condominium Units -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their January 24, 1984, meeting to consider an application for preliminary plat entitled The Pines which consists of approximately 3.55 acres and contains 26 to•.cnhouse units located on Lot 11, Block 3, Hilltop Estates. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending aRp-rQval of the preliminary plat subject to a number of conditions contained within the staff report. For additional information on this item, refer to the City Planner's report, copies enclosed on pages J! (o through/p a For a copy of the action taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to page (s) /Og— /09 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the application for preliminary plat entitled The Pines. SS CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - THE PINES APPLICANT: RLK CORPORATION, ROGER KREIDBERG LOCATION: LOT 11, BLOCK 3, HILLTOP ESTATES EXISTING ZONING: R-3 (RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 24, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 18, 1984 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting preliminary plat approval, The Pines, which consists of approximate- ly 3.65 acres and contains 26 townhouse units located on Lot 11, Block 3, Hilltop Estates, Section 22, directly north of Berry Ridge Road and east of Pilot Knob Road. ZONING AND LAND USE 4. • Presently, the parcel is zoned R-3 (Residential Townhouse District) and would only allow a townhouse development proposal. The proposed land use plan designates this parcel as R -I (Residential Single Dis- trict). Since the property is presently zoned Residential Townhouse District, the zoning would supersede the proposed Land Use Guide. COMMENTS As you may recall, there was an application submitted for preliminary plat in April of 1982. The preliminary plat was called Berry Ridge Condominiums. The applicant was the same as the applicant submitting this application. The original Berry Ridge Condominiums consisted of 26 dwelling units and contained underground garages with the develop- ment proposal. The original plat has expired and the applicant has not requested a continuance because of the type of structure proposed with underground garages which were not feasible to construct and sell in a market they were looking to obtain. Therefore, the original Ber- ry Ridge Condominiums are no longer a viable plat, and the applicant has now submitted a new application called The Pines which also is a townhouse development consisting of 26 dwelling units, but there will be no underground parking; there will be attached and detached garages with the development proposal. The parcel contains 3.65 net acres; there are no ponding areas, street rights-of-way or any other dedication to be subtracted from this par- ticular parcel. The platting of Lot 11, Block 3, Hilltop Estates, is net land free of any right-of-way for this development proposal. LL CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMI14ARY PLAT - THE PINES • JANUARY 24, 1984 PAGE TWO The applicant is proposing to again construct 26 dwelling units which is just under the maximum density allowed for this R-3 zoning. The maximum density allowed is 26.49 dwelling units for this tract of land. The development proposal consists of 18 two-bedroom units, 6 one -bedroom units and 2 three-bedroom units and will be marketed in the price range of $60,000-$75,000 per unit. In reviewing the lot coverage for this particular parcel, the two buildings and garages cover approximately 10.3% of the overall site. In reviewing this development proposal, the access proposed is off of Berry Ridge Road and dead -ending on the easterly end of the second townhouse or condo- minium building. Staff has looked at the potential of a loop street system. However, the grades are such that it is not feasible to con- nect the private access to Berry Ridge Road on the easterly edge of the plat. Staff had suggested that the driveway between the two con- dominium buildings be widened in order that a fire truck could be turned into and turned around in this area in order to provide bet- ter access for emergency vehicles. In review of the proposed development, the applicant meets all other ordinance requirements in 4eg'ard to setbacks, and the applicant is proposing to keep,as many of the existing trees which now exist on • the southerly edge of the property as is possible. There has been an actual survey of the trees showing their present location, and the majority of these trees will stay as development is constructed around the existing topography and vegetation. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) Two lots be created in order that each building would fit on an individual lot. 2) The development agreement shall be completed prior to the con- struction of any dwelling units. 3) A homeowner's association be established and the articles of declaration and bylaws be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to the submission of final plat. 4) A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and an adequate landscape be provided and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 5) The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comment because it abuts County road right-of-way. DCR/jach • •CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - THE PINES JANUARY 24, 1984 PAGE THREE ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS - THE PINES PRELIMINARY PLAT 6) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be submitted for approval depicting the proposed measures to sta- bilize side slopes and disturbed areas. 7) A storm sewer detection ponding system must be constructed in the NE; of this proposed development. 8) Adequate utility easements must be provided over the water main hydrant lead extensions. 9) This development shall be responsible for its residential street equivalent assessment for the 283 feet of front foot- age adjacent Pilot Knob Road to cover future upgrading. The final escrow amount shall be determined utilizing 1258 of the residential street equivalent rate for multiple dwellings at the time of final plat approval. RMH/jach Y . • • MEMO TO: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: RICHARD M. HEFTI, P.E., ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: JANUARY 17, 1984 SUBJECT: THE PINES, PRELIMINARY PLAT The Engineering Division of the Department of Public Works has the following comments regarding this proposed development for consid- eration by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. DRAINAGE/TOPOGRAPHY The existing topography of this site consists of a side hill with relatively steep slopes. The slopes range from 98-208 with the steeper slopes being generally located along the southerly portion. Also, the southerly pertion of this development is rather heavily wooded with pine trees. The remainder of this parcel consists of grassland. The existing drainage over this parcel is split with approximately the westerly third draini-ng.in a northwesterly direction and even- tually discharging into Pond JP -36, which is just south of St. John Neumann Church. The easterly two-thirds of this site drains in a northeasterly direction and eventually ends up in Pond JP -48. Fi- gure 1 illustrates the relationship of the drainage of this propos- ed development with the City's Master Storm Sewer Plan. At this time, neither of the previously mentioned ponds have con- trolled outlets. However, staff does not feel any action is neces- sary to provide outlets for either pond at this time for several reasons. For one thing, the proposed grading will not be signifi- cantly altered from its present patterns as a result of site grad- ing to accommodate this proposed development. Although the volume of storm water runoff will increase due to the roofs and paved sur- O faces, the runoff from the westerly one-third of this proposed de- velopment discharging eventually into Pond JP -36 is not significant with respect to the relatively large size of that pond. Similarly, a controlled outlet is not recommended at this time for Pond JP -48 as long as approximately 508 of the additional runoff from the wes- terly two-thirds of this development is detained in a small ponding area near the northeast corner of this parcel. With this pond, an overflow across the natural vegetation can be allowed and should create no greater problems than the present drainage. In addition, this pond could also serve as a sedimentation pond to improve the quality of this runoff. The proposed site grading over this parcel will require significant • amounts of excavation and fill resulting in relatively steep slopes. Subsequently, it is recommended that for maintenance purposes and slope stabilization purposes that slopes on this proposed develop- ment be a minimum of 3:1. In addition, staff would recommend a VE ENGINEERING REPORT THE'PINES PRELIMINARY PLAT • JANUARY 17, 1984 PAGE TWO detailed grading and erosion control plan be required to be submit- ted for approval, and also a landscape plan depicting how slope sta- bilization will be handled. UTILITIES Water service is available from an existing 8" diameter water later- al in Berry Ridge Road. However, it will be necessary to extend 6" diameter watermain into this property to provide for two hydrants to provide adequate fire protection. Also, sanitary sewer service is available from the existing sanitary sewer trunk line which lies 10' north of the north line of this property. This development will be allowed to tap into this line provided they acquire the necessary City permits. STRPRTS Existing streets bordering this proposed development consist of Pi- lot Knob Road to the west.and Berry Ridge Road to the south. Pilot Knob Road is a rural two-lane paved roadway under the jurisdiction of Dakota County, and subsequently is subject to access control. Berry Ridge Road is a residential street built to its ultimate de- sign (32' wide with bituminous surfacing and concrete curb and gut- • ter) and is under the City's jurisdiction. Pilot Knob Road is an- ticipated to be upgraded in the near future to a major collector col- lector street status by Dakota County. Subsequently, staff would recommend that either this development escrow its share of the im- provement costs for Pilot Knob Road upgrading or this development' signs a waiver of hearing for assessments for this improvement and it be listed as a pending assessment. Access to this proposed development is being proposed from Berry Ridge Road and is located approximately 170' east of the centerline of Pilot Knob Road. 0 Due to the existing topography, the alignment of the private drive is very limited. Subsequently, staff feels the parking and drive- way layout is laid out in the best arrangement given the circum- stances. However, in order to facilitate emergency vehicles such as fire trucks in gaining access to the easterly building, staff would recommend that the garage arrangement for the westerly build- ing be the same as for the easterly building. Also, large radiuses should be provided for the north driveway common to both buildings to facilitate maneuvering of the City's fire emergency vehicles. Figure 2 illustrates this recommendation. Finally, staff would recommend that a minimum of 50' of the drive- way approach to Berry Ridge Road be at a maximum of a 2% grade. • 0 ENGINEERING REPORT • THE PINES PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 17, 1984 PAGE THREE EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY All right-of-way for Berry Ridge Road and Pilot Knob Road have been previously dedicated under the Hilltop Estates plat. In addition, all adequate easements have been dedicated with the exception that additional easements will be required over the 6" watermain hydrant leads. ASSESSMENTS All trunk related assessments have been levied to this property. The only other assessment required is for the future upgrading of Pilot Knob Road as previously discussed. Current City policy would require a residential equivalent assessment for the 283.0 feet of frontage on Pilot Knob Road. A current estimated residential equi- valent rate would be $37.00 per front foot resulting in an assess- ment of $10,471.00. Therefore, it would be staff's recommendation to put $10,471.00 in escrow and utilize for the Pilot Knob project when it is carried out in conjunction with the Dakota County Highway Department. I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report in further • detail at the Planning Commission meeting of January 24, 1984. Respectfully submitted, Richard M.kfti, P.E. Assistant City Engineer RMH/jach • 7t 0 \ •- I 6 1 I \ \ i �:. •- � .. Zi ���� A 5 ;G 5 Garages zu ED �WJu ZP 10 / } , 4-GAvages I I I I r %1' / / �•9e I / � I 1 � ! t _ drag i rN 131 1-10 E OUTLINE SPECIFICATION Local Aat hurity Eagan,- Minnesota Project No. • or Developer j – Project Name Architect Arvid Elness Architects, Inc. Location Berry Ridge Condominiums Date hIlSTNUCTIovs: Describe all materials and equipment to be used Include no alternates ur equivalews. Show extent of work and typical details on draw•ingt rlitach additional sheets if necessary to completely describe the ..,wk. The Cost lirtinmte will recognize quality products and nwterials in excess of acceptable minimums, when specified. Certain /wrrs of the work .anent he put in their proper classification until pure infomwtion about their nwte ials and contrucritm it known: therefore describe. under notable categories helow, lire following: main terrier and other stairs, treads. risers, handrail; behalert, ere.: tourrd insulation of l,artitium and floors separating al,urunents and heM•rcn alwrrncnis and public spans, utility conduits and tunnels, water pratfing and drainage. utilities. and related inrulatio retaining walls: garages and oceestnry buildings: and off-site improvements required to serve the project such as roads. Gohr, walks, utilities. norm sewers, plashing, roc. To include definitions and nroiect close out. 2. SITEWORK: assume 2.000 lb. Type of Soil Soil aSSLsnled as per rePOrt ; Bearing Capacity is , Material and thickness of fill and base course. Demolition: Construction of structures to be demolished and materials to be reused. Other land improvements. parking landscaj)e Storm Drainage: Culverts, pipes, manholes, catch basins, downspout connection (dry well, splash blocks, storm sewer). Site Preparation: Tree protection, surgery, wells, walls, topsoil stripping, clearing, grubbing, and rough grading. Site preparation to. include tree protection, clearing, TOugh grading, excavating stripping and stockpiling --removal if necessary. Curbs and Gutters: Type and material. - Pavement: Material and thickness of base and wearing surface for drives, parking areas, streets, alleys, courts, walks, drying yards and gyfay areas. Steps, handrails, the kwal s. itutTunOLIS Paving t�uc•ness as required by local conditions and city vehicle size. Possibly 2" wearing course over 4" to 6" gravel. Concrete walks with 6 x 6 - 10 x 10 w.w.f. over 4" gravel (concrete 4,000 psi air entrained). N i mens for Special Areas and Enclosures: Play equipment. benches, fences - — — Finish Grading: Approximate existing depth and method of improving topsoil. Extent of finish grading. see site plan - estimate till or soil r"lrn4wI Lawns and planting: Type, site, quantity and location of lawn, ground cover and hedge material, trees, shrub;, etc. Ntinv existing trees and ShrLbs to remain. Now trees and a conbination of seeding and sodding to repair site. Its much of site as possible to be left in relatively natural state. NOTE: This Outline is based an the "Uniform System" for Construction Specifications. Data Filing, and Cost Accounting developed by AIA. CSI, and AGC. Peg 1 a1 8 V.Y.. - Previous EJI1iow is Obsola tc HUD 5087 (9,911 94 ]. CONCRETE: Concrete strength for exterior walls below and above grade, interior walls and partitions, piers, footings, columns and • girders. Size, thickness and location on drawings. Note portions having reinforcing steel on drawings. Location, site and material of footing drains and outlet. Footincs: 3.000 psi reinforced concrete • 0 Concrete strengdt or rein Forcing determined bv`structural _ engineer. Structural system of concrete floors at basement, other floors and roof. Thickness of slabs and strength of concrete. Attached exterior concrete steps and porches. If more than one type of construction is used, list separately and state locations. 1st floor plan on grade 3,000 psi. Slab Perimeter Insulation: 1 1/2" extruded polystyrene on vertical face of foundation wall to frost line. - 0. MASONRY: Material and thickness of exterior walls above and below grade. interior walls and partitions, fire walls, stair, hall and elevator enclosures, chimneys, incinerators, veneer, sills, copings, etc. C.......t�+:.... .....11. on ..-.J 1011 _-_c ---- J 5. METALS: Miscellaneous Iron: Material and size of items such as: Access Doorsa� Area Gratings N Foundation Vents Lintels as required Fire Escapes none Structural Steel: Framing or structural system used. N/A rein[orcinc rods at reinforcing _ concrete block walls. 6. CARPENTRY: Size, spacing, and grade of lumber to be used for floor, roof, exterior walls above grade and interior partition framing, subfloor, sheathing, underlay ens and exterior fin! h materials (wood sidin , shingles, ash tos Win etc.). Exterior walls x b's at 2�" on centerDoug, or ��em. fir stud ¢rade___ All interior artitions - 2 x 4's at 16" on center, wood trctss_at 20" TJI at ?l' and ecn�cr at rooF. S/3" COX exterior 4 x-3 roof Shea df in . ' 4 Grade and species or interior and exterior linish work. g LxdCriQ:-,�,hca fiijg.-/2" 1" cLterior siclali wi.thNcch�ood_oz�pruce, lap- e.W 7 W a Ox W. 4s HUD -5087 17.e 11 7. MOISTURE PROTECTION: Materials and method of waterproofing walls and stabs below grade, location, thickness or number of plies. • Type of permanent protection of waterproofing (pa(ging) if used. Method of dampprooling above grade. Flathing materials if other than sheet metal. Spandrel waterproofing. 6 mil. vapor harrier below slabs on trade. Bittuninous watcthroofing below grade. Thermal Insulation: Thickness R•value and type of material. Method of installation. Exterior walls Full thickness batt - R-19 6" _ Ceiling below Root R- 38 It town insul at ion - Other Rpofing: Roof covering maters Is ad method of applic tion, weight of ;hi glee, pumper of tell plies bitumen, ate. Pitdted roots: 23 19. asphalt s�iilules wit�i 15 lb. felt UL class "C". Sheet Metal: Material and weight or gauge for flashings, copings, gutters and downspouts, roof ventilators, scuppers, etc. Flashing - 26 gage GI or n ilisb Caulking: Nonstaining by MONK) or GE. 8. DOORS, WINDOWS AND GLASS: • Windows and Frames: Type and Material. Special construction features or protective treatment. _Vinyl clad wood singlehung, double glazed or nrefinished aluminlml single hung_ wi t -h thermal break- screens. Balcony access and_walk. DLL1~leYC�d4ffT�:�All�iitlml Glazing: Thickness, strength and grade of glass and method al glaain i zona 1 S 11dCrS lJl to }TCrmal Ureal. S/3" insulated glass. Metal Curtain Walls: WA Doors and Frames: Exterior: Thickness, material and type at all locations. 1 3/4" solid wood with £lass lights and 1 3/4" insulated hollow metal. Fraooci—frame entry an hollow metal Interior: Thickness, material snd type for public hall% and stairs, apartments (entrance and interior), boiler rooms, lire doors and other Finish Hardware: Material and finish of exterior and interior lockols, sliding and folding door hardware, window and cabinet hardware, door closer, door knockers, numbers, etc. Prehlut¢ doors, closet doors, window and cabinet hardtvare faetory annLied. Remnininr I�" lardt.,are to be selected and Provided in harchaare schedule. • P.W d or a P.a.. HUD -5087 19811 M Weathersuipping: Material and Type. • Weatherstripping_—'– windows Factory .JiLicd------- -'-- - - -- .. _.._..- —------- --.. Exterior Doors 1;CCLl1dCC1-1'VGif�)o.t_f-)emn-applied._—_ _ Thresholds �I tal fl-a[-_Platc with hnish----_.....---'.---------.--'------.-'--...--.----. • Screens: Type and material of mesh and frames. RICtOty s11111)1LC(1 to nItCh WindOwSLt-L00(I Or Ill(lmintun. A11 velltti till) ied With factory provided screens. 9. FINISHES: Grade• material, and thickness of all finishes. Ceilings - sp_ray texture_ Walls - gy_ps(un boardpainted with Wood base --- - - — - ------ Floors - carpet. sheet vin -1— ----------'-- _-.--- _-- Painting: Type and number of coats. Exterior Interior Wood 2 stain or 1 primer/1 finish wood 1 primer, 1 finis') or prefinshcd Mefal- 1 primer, �in>s) en� al mel Metal 1 primer, 1 finis enamel Masonry Walls&Ceilings 1 coat Iii _build latex, spray .__ Kitchen & Bath 1 pr.imt r texture 1 finish (semi -gloss) Tile and Ceramic Bathroom Accessories: Floor and Wall Covering Materials: Thickness, gra! e. finish and wainscot height. LOCATION Units FLOORS M MATERIAL - HALLS Batliroorls Sheet vinyl 0.090" Painted hoard, wood b h. Sheet vinyl 0.090" Painted board wood b .. Living Rooms Bedrooms Carpet Painted boaicl wood it. - V s ibul Pavers Painted ). board wood b Stairs/Corrido s Carpet Painted I board, -wood h Bathroom Accessories: Material and Quantity. - Attached Soap dish, robe hook 2 towel bars toilet paper .l)older,_glass shower doo». _ Resilient Flooring: Location, type and gauge, for all materials. 0.090" sheet vinyl in bathrooJ�(itCllCnS and entries. 10. SPECIALTIES: List Significant Items. Coal Chutes N/A . Interior partitions other than concrete, masonry or wood. Central 'IV antenna system With outlets :111 unit. 11) for each unit. P.e. a of a ".e . 97 Ht ID-SOR7 19.R I I Ise Ise Ise Ise Ise MCdici a Cabinets: Materi I, size and type. _ • Stirrace motulted mirror—with horizontal c:tbine.t-14"-:x=350" ;Incld 1i�t._-- — --- Mail Boxes, Package Receivers. Packaged Incinerators. II. EQUIPMENT: Relrigerators: Capacity for each size of living unit. l4 CII. , two door.S? �Efr0 -- Cars ------- Kitchen Ranges: Size and type for each size of living unit. 30" electrical witJ� 4 burncr5,_ysnCC(LCtng�ILOOS�CaLs Kitchen Cabinets: Detail on drawings. Wall Units: Material Prefabricated Base Units: Material Prefabricated Counter Top and Backsplath Material Plastic laminate Other cabinets and built-in storage units: same cabinets in Equipment: Garbage disposal units, dishwashers, clothes washers and dryers. Hook In for wrsh r and dr✓er only--noyni^ Garbage disposal 12. FURNISHINGS: Finish Prefinished ' back Shades: Type of shades, venetian blinds or other devices for privacy and control of natural light. Shades all bedrooms Drapery tracks all living [nits 13. SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION: Incinerators — Job constructed. 14. CONVEYING SYSTEMS: Elevators: Attach letter from manufacturer whose elevator installation is proposed, containing a brief comprehensive specification for the complete elevator installation, and the manufacturers statement that the number of elevators proposed and the installation described will provide adequate service, and that manufacturer maintains an effective service organization in the project locality. 0 15. MECHANICAL: Plumbing and Hot Water Supply: Fixtures: Material, size, fittings, trim and color. Sink _2 comp. SS 32" X 22" sink Shower over tub Lavatory floor Inotmted v.Lnin, Stall Shower fibcrg),-I Water Closet kzLC--tank`type—floor_mltrited .._ Laundry Trays __, _,-- Bathtub lin Imcled formed steel Other e•w 5 or a n•a•• • H UD -SN 7 19a l l rI I Piping: Material Soillinn Cast iron Gas Lines Black Steel Waste Lines NIS plastic Stindpipes _ Vents ABS pl:istie _ Interior Downspouts NollC__ Water Copper type "I." Valve Shuiolf for Servicing [lotcold water ings- ps �hulIoff.— —_ Domestic Water Heating: Direct lir",' Type, capacity and recovery rate. GIs fired. mpgcity to be detci lim-d Indirect fired: Separate boiler or combined with space heating boiler. Storage and recovery capacity. Solar Energy: Application System Subsystem System Capacity Insulation: Type and thickness of insulation on water lines and water heating equipment. Heating: Kind of System: Hot water, steam, forced warm air'gravity warm air, air— Forced tcForced air. _ Fuel Used: gas Calculated Load: to be determined. Heating , Domestic Hot Water , Total Equipment: Make and Model Input (per hr.): Coal (lbs.) , oil (gals.) , gas (8TUH) Output (8TUH) Distribution System: duct to exterior Wall. Insulation: Type and thickness of insulation on heating equipment and distribution system. Room Heating Units: Baseboard units, radiators, convectors, registers, etc. Solar Energy: Subsystem System Capacity _, .___ Space Heaters: Type, make, model, location and output of heating systems such as wall heaters, floor furnaces and unit heaters. • Pie* 6 or 6 P -e -r r rUD .5011 7 (9-81) 99 - Temperature Controls: Individual unit, zone, central, etc. Individual till itswith theonozitalm..___...------- - Ventilation: Location, capacity and purpose of ventilating fans. 'rOi l et_CXJIj I LIS t,_k i tclien cAhal6t dtgtc<I._t0 outgido.,...... ... Air Conditioning: 'INJO Systems: 1. AC sleeves and panel covers with 120V outlet Unitary Equipment: Self Contained or packaged units. - below, 2. Central forced air system capahle with Calculated load: —_ LWing CO11dCiLStS ._____ Equipment: Make, model, operating voltage and capacity in RTUH for each sire serving individual rooms, apartment units, or zone. Central System: Calculated load: Equipment: Make; model capacity, etc., of compressor, condenser, cooling tower, water chillers, air handling equipment, and:other components which make up the complete system. Utilities On -Site: Material for distribution system for all piped utilities. Water Supply: fire hydrants, yard hydrants, lawn sprinkler systems, exterior drinking fountains. Gas: Sanitary Sgwerage: Treatment plants, pumping stations, manholes. Ex>sune sewer to illmhediate north of si Q 16. ELECTRICAL: - Electric Wiring: Type of wiring and load centers, number of circuits per unit, individual unit metering or project metering, spare conduit for future load requirements, radio or TV antenna systems. Show receptacles, light outlets, switches, power outlets, telephone outters, door bells, fire alarm systems, etc., on drawings. Individual unit meterinc: Smoke detectors al r-O.t1�L;11_-. Electric fixtures: Type for various locations. Units - incandescent throw h tt--cxsap.t--�--itctlen_sinhnd-bathrooa-sitik=_flouresmit. P.I 7 or a'.". HUD -5011719.811 • /OD Electric light standards for lighting grounds, streets, courts, etc. Underground or overhead service. Un cc—Tr rF otaid service to_strcc:t_p:�rki_ng.lot All items of construction, equipment and finish, togetherwithall incidentals, which are essential to the completion of the project will be provided whether or not specifically included in the exhibits and will be of a type, quality and capacity acceptable to HUO and appropriate to the character of the project. Pow a or a pages /O I HUD -5081 (9-81) v I $ � � I - r �iJ ConOgnriipla. _ _ `.. _ � • • : �, Bary Radpe Road t SRE PLAN 0 x PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION • FA I � I / Q+ronn idr ft m - Area CRk"adait Tar we 1545.09• an. 365.0.. w .v.n d wl. w NOC 1W. q w.r PXr.0 0...•r t t631 W n Pen l� W Q>s� Swc• r...nn LI IiaghY CakdfltlonS TB V.I. 0 1.+ 7.31 Inn r ParkkV Provided 35 exn..s 1.w 91J. 13-s .. JJ. as Pr.ry Twm PY•ry $IJf IP UM NJO 765 " G� The ......... iYa.1Y..1 ZV3 I;R4 12 TAU 1�,C �1'fv L9OURC15 rf RLK Corporation Roper KroleOerp, Pr 115 Western Avenu St. Paul. Minnesota Parry .O. Y.b('1 K Lb[fn�tL M1 -6100' e. 0 0 Burry Ridge Road I I }� SITE R11N • a..l. 1•- art mr—cj L + 1 Lam, I PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION Aowr, arY UTILITY PLAN Ah The er.,u�rarlr �. +aclc;�omasrt RLK Corporation RoBor Kr Old Garp• Pr 115 WOal Orn Avonu Sl. Paul. Minneaole 10-1001 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION Aowr, arY UTILITY PLAN Ah The er.,u�rarlr �. +aclc;�omasrt RLK Corporation RoBor Kr Old Garp• Pr 115 WOal Orn Avonu Sl. Paul. Minneaole 10-1001 t 0 �..-- o a o Hoer ee ! , ieg? ,' s. ' I :�/,��/ _ �, baa - �=._. .. (:• -L �• _a`a:. .t 8017 Woe Aoad I I SfTE R.AN 1 _ 3a 1� b J 1 PINES tnaYupelll r. ,Ca 4'1Z.�OfIR3 n] PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION PrwirN GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN RLK Coroorallon Roger Kraldborg, Pit' 115 Western Avomi $1. Paul, Mlriheeol e` 0 0 ,a=6p, r I' \\ I I PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION PrwirN GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN RLK Coroorallon Roger Kraldborg, Pit' 115 Western Avomi $1. Paul, Mlriheeol e` 0 0 ,a=6p, S.E I,':} SEC. 21,T27, R....., i 31 ( PILOT , II KNOB 7 ROAD 1 �"' COUNTY � ST TE AID �!� HIGHWAY ( �p Ulm .......... ........ 7f Cc v..ai::: v• , . Z M 10 1 WIN • ply n L >mw ''f:vi•::::::. �r ..: tiR. �.; ;.: - I 1 X. V� 1 `sz� }I8 I s 1 e' 0r • 7 '• st . ��I�r ♦ . nul urm! i I oil 0 �•![�•,X:� I � 8 ! �, s. • < I W it • Z dim � � � Vii' , I I d ,y�� .s a� • sq I s = a • i • �� ._ :�'� p is = .q a o. � a a�.... f• I 1 GB •- . /1, _- _ _ _�.. v�. Ra ..,.;.,�..�,__-- nL t GOLF.�. 5/u owl >- =I - . '':'•: ;;: •.:.. :. Ind.,��RCIALVELDPMENT E LB R -II •. " •� = Ind .>.._ II -_ - - - ..RI R -II' �. GB - .I - D R 9 - R -N- --- — - +'- -' --- - Ra ..,. ,.-.. 1 '•1'l , ... - . Ind. G R&D ' - v fel P i O r .. Ind. F NS R -III . _ Rfi •r ® Lg� _ Ik LB R -II a � Ral,.- ., CSC J+�, - -- :;� Ind. �- R41 R -I.: P GOLF •"': R -II _ _ 1 ;• .1'L lalf'• v =�L{ 11 Ind RillR-1- - " .Fq E p -- N ter. ..� �R•111 fir- P j �" ,QTY R41RLI i' HS ". . R-11 R•1 .,Q R-11 _— R-11�' •� R=11 - R -III : R II r :: _`-r_: M i• �' R -ill RB--- ( R-Ilt R'lll - - Rli�7li:="�`;"'•_���>\ �`. R41 CSClGB/L R -111 R -1 % 1. p R-112• ;!ss. R -II R -II ,� y.r•� t.: :. f+Y -i' R -II .... - R-11e-v�.:• a _ 458 • �4'�-•.,,...•,�,. - - •'i•: -R•I.c�- P J.J. �+': ••-: i`•!`-% r• ,.:. .. �:✓,r .. .. iNB LB :.F}I' :+/;:• _ CSC RB LB - r R l P 1,' R-1 C i _- / c cc�w rr PI _ R -II Pi R-11 •� ;i.�yly' wa• I R4- j�, R-11 I P o ;ROSENOU:r: /,--LLEY APC Minutes • January 24, 1984 THE PINES - PRELININARY PLAT The next hearing presented to the Planning Commission was the application of R.L.K. Corporation and Roger Kreidberg for preliminary plat approval of The Pines. The proposal is for 26 townhouse units located in Lot 11, Block 3, Hilltop Estates consisting of 3.6 acres north of Berry Ridge Road and east of Pilot Knob Road. Dale Runkle detailed the proposal with the Council and stated that Mr. Kreidberg submitted an application for preliminary plat approval in April of 1982. At that time, underground garages were proposed with only one building. The new application proposed two buildings and no underground garages but some detached and some attached garages. The zoning is R-3 and the maximum density allowed is 26.49 dwelling units with the project to consist of 18 two-bedroom units, 6 one -bedroom units and 2 three- bedroom units being marketed in the $60,000.00 to $75,000.00 price range. Topographic constraints on this parcel create some problems with its develop- ment. Staff recommended that the drive between the two buildings be widened. in order that a fire truck could be turned around. Mr. Kreidberg and his architect from Arvid Elness Architects was present. Mr. Kriedberg stated they will retain nearly all of the pine trees and that they would accept the garage revision to allow greater space between the two buildings. Single phase • construction is planned with one building built at a time. One neighboring family was present and had concerns about the grade of Berry Ridge Road and it was noted that the Pilot Knob Road elevation may eventually be changed. Also, they had concerns about the additional traffic on Berry Ridge Road which potentially would be created from the site. Two fire hydrants will be pro- vided on the site, according to the architect. No play areas are being proposed because the developer expects that there will be very few children in the units. There was considerable discussion concerning the recommendation of the engineering staff for a residential street equivalent assessment covering the 283 feet of frontage on Pilot Knob Road for future Pilot Knob Road up- grading. Mulrooney moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Two lots shall be created in order that each building would fit on an individual lot. 2. The development agreement shall be completed prior to the construc- tion of any dwelling units. 3. A homeowner's association shall be established and the articles, declarations and bylaws shall be rLeviewed by the City Attorney prior to the submission of the final plat. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and an adequate land- scape bond shall be provided and not released until one year after the land- scaping has been completed. • • • APC Minutes January 24, 1984 5. The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comment because it abuts County Road right-of-way. 6. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be sub- mitted for approval depicting the proposed measures to stabilize side slopes and disturbed areas. 7. A storm sewer detention ponding system, shall be constructed in the NE 1/4 of this proposed development. 8. Adequate utility easements shall be provided over the water main hydrant lead extensions. 9. This development shall be responsible for its residential -street equivalent assessment for the 283 feet of front footage adjacent Pilot Knob Road to cover future upgrading. The final escrow amount shall be determined utilizing 125% of the residential street equivalent rate for multiple dwell- ings subject to reconsideration, modification or elimination by the City Council at the time of final plat approval. 10. That the garages on the east end of the West building shall be realligned to allow greater emergency vehicle turning area. All voted in favor, except Hall who opposed the provision regarding escrowing funds for future Pilot Knob Road upgrading and stated that the City has not required that in the past. Mulrooney then moved, Hall seconded the motion to request the staff undertake a study concerning the propriety and procedures of advanced collections for potential assessments for public im- provements, including street improvements prior to the improvements being installed and that the staff report its findings to the City Council. All voted in favor. 4TH ADDITION - PEO.IIO kfy PLAT The application of T Land Company and adley Swenson for preliminary plat approval of Sunset 4th ition, cons ing of approximately 15.16 acres with 32 single family lots in paN of t Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 25 south of Dif a Road, west of Saddlehorn Addition and north of Hackmore Dri/undR-1 t h Dale Runkle introduced the project and noted the parcel 1 ned D elopment and is a part of Lexington South PD. The proposa is R -II th a density of 3 to 6 units per acre and the overall y would cont 2.2 dwelling units per acre. The minimum guidelines zoning will be m in the proposal and it was noted the applicant ia looped street, Sunset Drive, which would provide access to allle family lots south of Yorktown Place. Brad I 9 L • • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Seventeen CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/THE RENTAL PLACE D. Larry D. Pedersen, The Rental Place, for a Conditional Use Pylon Business Sign -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission .at their last regular meeting held on January 24, 1984, to consider an application submitted by Larry D. Pedersen, The Rental Place, for a pylon business sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition in Section 19. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the conditional use permit. For additional information --- reeffer to the City Planner's report, copies enclosed on pages /// through IIS For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to pages) IJ (o . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for a pylon business sign as presented by Larry D. Pedersen. Ho • CITY OF EACAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: LARRY D. PEDERSEN, THE RENTAL PLACE LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BARTON MCGRAY ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 24, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 19, 1984 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a con- ditional use permit for a pylori sign advertising The Rental Place lo- cated on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition. COMMENTS As you may recall, the original application submitted was a request • for a conditional use permit for outside storage for the location of a rental place business on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition. Along with that application, there was also a request for a pylon sign.. Since staff did not publish the legal notice specifically for the pylon sign, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed use recommending approval and also a direction that they would approve the pylon sign if it would meet all of the criteria of the Sign Ordi- nance. In reviewing the pylon sign, the top of the sign would be no more than 27 feet in height and the signage area per side would con- tain no more than 124 feet of signage. It appears that the proposed sign would meet all of the criteria of the Sign Ordinance. In trying to check this exact location with the existing sign from the old Kinney Shoe, it could be very close to being 300 feet from that particular sign. If this sign.is approved, the Planning Commission may want to make the recommendation that it be placed 300 feet from the sign of the old Kinney Shoe northwest of this particular lot. However, the Kin- ney Shoe sign has .not been renewed and should be taken down. If a 300 -foot spacing could be maintained, it would be less conflict in the future if and when Kinney Shoes would convert to a different use just northeast of this particular lot. If approved, the pylon sign should be approved subject to the follow- ing conditions: • 1) All of the conditions regarding the Sign Ordinance be adhered to regarding height, size and distance from other pylon signs. CITY OF EAGAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - LARRY D. PEDERSEN • JANUARY 24, 1984 PAGE TWO 2) The sign be renewed yearly in accordance with the Sign Ordinance. DCR/jach Aga E E PAP401 / t K • /HC � S" LNr� 'N/I[[ y 1LUM c �:.Odl7�set/Y� TU'7F� i�iT;'q C'I'•(�IN�•�r'CLI�S 0 /9'3„ , 7! 10 al DlZ"O1 SUBJECT P •�7 �t3 00 F j1js d p10-00 It !f. X14 / 0 a••ua. •(�Il-tl L�.•r d AM �e 7 ■ / CNA L1La5 ✓.NZ a••ua. •(�Il-tl L�.•r py3-12 I �Z IIA k� NU I FSILL LI q / .`• ,tom=tirr;� ;. o LI y 1 c \ GPg GLS Uh GB 14 1 . DOG r T PF t o / ml r B-2 SCHOOL i _ . ..� .�•.... k1l Ii --7- � L .:,,:� PARCEL Ll 41 I �Z IIA k� NU I FSILL LI q / .`• ,tom=tirr;� ;. o LI y 1 c \ GPg GLS Uh GB 14 1 JUNIOR T PF o HIGH ml r B-2 SCHOOL i 0 p qW PF� vc 0 L R-4 CE �Nousr ia� PF '�► Nrt!IL 5 �E 9 _ 10E umuun rr.: 0 W - APC Minutes • January 24, 1984 20. No dead-end lateral water mains will be allowed. Mr. Mulrooney recommended that public right-of-way be provided based upon the reasons outlined by the Engineering staff, including more control over maintenance, police and fire protection and general public safety. Those in favor were McCrea, Hall, Krob and Wold; against were Wilkins, Mulrooney and Merkley. Member Mulrooney stated the only; reason he voted against the motion was he favored the public right -of -Way in !the project, and otherwise favored the proposal. THE RENTAL PLACE - COHDIMOHAL USE PEMT The hearing regarding the application of Larry D. Pedersen for condi- tional use permit for The Rental Place for a pylon sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition was convened by Chairman Hall. Dale Runkle outlined the proposal and indicated that the conditional use permit had been granted for outside storage for the location of a rental business on the lot, and it appeared that the proposed sign would meet all the criteria of the sign ordinance including the 300 foot spacing from the existing Kinney Shoe Sign. • Contact had been made with Kinney Shoe but no determination as to removal of the sign had yet been made. Mr. Pedersen was present and stated that he would comply with the 300 foot spacing. Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. All of the conditions regarding the Sign Ordinance shall be adhered to regarding height, size and distance from other pylon signs. 2. The sign shall be renewed yearly in accordance with the Sign Ordi- nance. All voted in favor. GEORGE A MIRIAN HAIL - VARIANCE The hearing regarding the application of George and Miriam Nall for a variance for the keeping of horses on a 4 112 acre parcel of land zoned R-1 located at 3960 Pilot Knob Road was next convened. Dale Runkle detailed the application and noted that the applicant now is requesting that 5 horses be stabled on the property. A sketch showing the proposed fenced area on the north property line and a shed to the rear that would house the horses was reviewed by the Planning Commission. Alice and Ted Bolke were present and asked questions about the sheltering of horses and also the storage of numer- ous older cars on the east area of the property. Mrs. Nall stated the plan 5 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Eighteen PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION/CARRIAGE HILLS HOUSING REVENUE BOND E. Request for Preliminary Resolution to Consider $6,000,000 Multi -Family Housing Development Revenue Bond Issue/Carriage Hills Apartment Project -- The City has received an application from Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. on behalf of Tomark Development Company to sell $6,000,000 of Multi -Family Housing Deveicpment Revenue Bonds. Housing revenue bonds are excluded tr from the current federal moritorium on the use of industrial revenue financing. Tomark Development Company has land use and zoning approvals for the expansion of the Carriage Hills Condominium Development Project. Therefore, consideration of a multi -family housing development revenue bond is in order for consideration by the City. Procedure for handling multi- family development housing development revenue bond 'applications is the same as industrial revenue financing regulations. The first action is to establish a public hearing to consider the preliminary resolution (inducement resolution) which could be at the March 6, 1984, City Council meeting. For additional information on this item, refer to a letter prepared by Miller & Schroeder Municipals Inc. and various attachments including a letter from Miller & Schroeder to Tomark Development Company that provide background on this revenue bond request. Copies • of this information are enclosed on pages //9 through 12t • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a public hearing to consider a preliminary resolution for multi- family housing development revenue bond issue for Carriage Hills Apartment project in the amount of $6,000,000 at the March ®,lb 1984, City Council meeting. 117 Toll Free Minnesota (600) 862-6002 JAN 1 `� 10,84Toll Free Other States (800) 328-6122 • Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 • (612) 831-1500 January 12, 1984 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan, Minnesota 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: $6,000,000 City of Eagan, Minnesota Multifamily Housing Development Revenue Bonds (Carriage Hills Apartments Project) • Dear Mr. Hedges: Enclosed please find a copy of the engagement letter between Tomark Development Company and Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. This letter sets forth a bilatteral commitment between the parties involved, incorporating a promise to cover all costs incurred by the City with respect to the bond issue. The developer is aware that the City is considering a small fee to be paid to the City at the time a Preliminary Inducement Resolution is received. As we discussed in our meeting last Wednesday, Miller & Schroeder is pleased to work in conjunction with the City of Eagan in the development of a multifamily housing program. The existing 462C Bond Plan encompasses only single family housing, and would have to be amended to include multifamily housing. We will work with you and the City staff in the preparation of documents for a submission to the Metropolitan Council for an Eagan 462C Bond Plan Amendment. In addition, Miller & Schroeder will prepare the City's submission to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for approval of the Housing Program pursuant to the Plan. • I have attached a drawing of the Carriage Hills Condominium development as it exists, including the proposed three additional buildings. It is Tomark Development Company's intent to complete the sale of units in the present buildings S Headquarters: Minneapolis, Minnesota Branch OfficesDorntorn Minneapolis • Solaoa Beach, California • Northbrook, Illinois • SL Paul. Minnesota • Naples, Florida • Carson City, Nevada Mem a me Se .nbes lm . Raccoon Caporation • Mr. Thomas Hedges January 12, 1983 Page Two (orange) and then develop two of the remaining three buildings you see on the drawing (yellow). The South building would be 72 units, while the North building would be 78 units. The remaining building (pink) would be developed at some point in the future, depending on market conditions for rental units versus condominiums. We would propose to be at the market with bonds by late spring or early summer in order to take advantage of a more attractive interest rate in the first half of 1984. This would mean City Council approval of the Bond Plan Amendment as well as a Preliminary Inducement Resolution for Tomark at the March 20 meeting. This would require the Council to adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing on February 7. A thirty day publication period is required by Minnesota Statute, Chapter 462C, for the Plan Amendment. A fifteen day period is required for the Housing Program. The notice could incorporate both a Plan and Program. • Your prompt response to our proposal would be most appreciated, as Tomark Development Company has much preparation ahead of them to meet a spring deadline. As a reminder to the City, this bond issue will not be a general obligation of Eagan. A deposit institution will be the obligator on the bond and, with the pledging of its collateral, would achieve a "AAA" rating for the bonds. If you have any additional questions, or if I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to give me a call. Very truly yours, Marcia A. Cohodes underwriter MAC /pmh Enclosures • 119 The Condominiums Of Ic r ('4N cr — It Carriage HTfis U� Golf Course C, 0 O Cc) 0 9) Yank** Doodle fted Toll Free Minnesota (800) 662.6002 _ Toll Free Other States (800) 3286122 '1 r1 U Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Minneapolis. Minnesota 55431 • (612) 831.1500 January 11, 1984 Mr. Mark Ravich Tomark Development Company 7322 Ohms Lane Edina, Minnesota 55435 Re: $6,000,000 City of Eagan, Minnesota Multifamily Housing Development Revenue Bonds (Carraige Hills Apartments Project) Dear Mr. Ravich: Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. ("Miller & Schroeder") wishes to confirm its understanding with Tomark Development Company (the "Corporation") concerning the proposed underwriting of $6,000,000 Multifamily Housing Develop- ment Revenue Bonds ("the Bonds") for the purpose of constructing approximately one hundred fifty (150) market rate residential units located in the Carriage Hills development area. Miller do Schroeder will utilize its experienced staff of financial specialists as a resource in structuring and marketing the Bonds. Our staff will make an analysis of the structure of the offering and will evaluate the potential market, including price levels, for the distribution of the Bonds. Scope of Miller h Schroeder's Services Miller do Schroeder agrees to provide the following services in connection with the proposed financing: A. Miller do Schroeder's responsibilities in connection with the devel- opment of the proposed financing will include: (1) working in conjunction others in an analysis to legal requirements to designed to accomplish) with you, your counsel and the necessary financial and develop a financial program our purpose; (2) preparing any necessary mathematical computations with respect to the Bonds and making those computa- tions available to your, your2co1unsel and others; Headquarters: Minneapolis. Branch Offices: Dowraown Minneapolis • Solaria Beach. California • Northbrook. Illinois • SL Paul, Minnesota • Naples, Florida • Carson City. Nevada MemM1ry of rM $fcunlrn Ime.rry AOIrtUon COrpwelwn 0 Mr. Mark R'avich January 11, 1984 Page Two (3) submitting to you a Bond Purchase Agreement be- tween you and Miller h Schroeder to review by your counsel and execution by the appropriate parties. (4) arrange, coordinate and attend meetings with Standard do Poor's Corporation as are appropriate and furnish all required information to such rating agency. B. Miller do Schroeder's responsibilities in connection with the imple- mentation of the financing plan and the underwriting and distrib- ution of the Bonds will include: (l) analyzing for your review the types, amounts and size of the Bonds to be issued and the estimated prices of the Bonds, all based on then current market condi- tions; (2) making recommendations relating to the timing and • implementation of all phases of the financing; (3) advising and assisting you in connection with the preparation of necessary documents relating to the issuance of the Bonds, including those documents re- quired to be filed with any federal or state regulatory agency; (4) coordinating with your staff and counsel, and others, the preparation of the Official Statement relating to the Bonds; (5) distributing the Official statement to potential pur- chasers; (6) performing all other necessary services required to accomplish the financing as requested by the Company to assure the successful issuance of the Bonds. Corporation's Responsibilities The Corporation's responsibilities in connection with the issuance of the Bonds will include: • A. Making available to Miller & Schroeder such data and reports that you have or may hereafter develop pertaining to the financing plan or any phase thereof. Miller do Schroeder may rely upon any such written data and reports furnished by you in the preparation ILL 0 • • Mr. Mark Ravich January ll, 1984 Page Three of the financing of any phase thereof under this Agreement. You further agree to co-operate with Miller do Schroeder in making your management available for such conferences and consulta- tions as may be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement. B. Not incurring any expenses that will be the responsibility of Miller do Schroeder without first receiving written consent from Miller do Schroeder. Payment of Costs and Expenses All, costs and expenses incident to the execution and performance of this Agreement and to the sale and delivery of the Bonds including, but not limited to: (i) the fees and expenses of the Issuer's counsel; (ii) the fees and expenses of the Company's counsel and accountants; (iii) the fees and expenses of Bond Counsel, and counsel to the Underwriter; (iv) all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the preparation and printing of the Official Statement (Private Placement Memorandum); (v) all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the prepara- tion and printing of the Bonds; and NO all expenses (including fees and disburse- ments of counsel) incurred in connection with the qualification of the Bonds for sale and determination of the eligibility for investment under the laws of such jurisdiction as. Miller do Schroeder may designate and preparation of Blue Sky and Legal Investment Memoranda, shall be payable by the Company, irrespective of whether the Bonds are issued. + It is agreed that the fee charged by Miller do Schroeder for underwriting and selling the bonds will be an amount equal to three percent (3%) of the loan amount. Our underwriting fee will be due and payable at the closing of this transaction.** you further agree to pay Miller do Schroeder a fee of $5,000 if you use the inducement resolution and not utilize Miller do Schroeder as underwriter. This fee is payable ffi�oxcocclosing. + Howev Mille s Schr r shall et your authorization before camai.ttinv Your iompany to any o Mese expenses. •• If Miller s Schr°d dos t u derwr to Communications �l27fer ed scYiroe'�er. ?}ow All notices, requests, demands required hereunder shall be in writing if delivered or mailed, postage prepaid and sell the bonds no fee will be due ever, and other communications permitted or and shall be deemed to have been duly given to the following address: If to: Ms. Marcia A. Cohodes Miller do Schroeder Municipals, Inc. 2300 Northwestern Financial Center 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 If to: Mr. Mark Ravich Tomark Development Company 7322 Ohms Lane Edina, Minnesota 55.435 113 • Mr. Mark Ravich January 11, 1984 Page Four 0 Duration and Termination This Agreement shall remain in effect until December 31, 1984 or until the Bonds have been issued, whichever is earlier. This Agreement may be extended by written agreement between both parties. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the succesors-in- interest of each of the parties hereto, but shall not be assignable by either party without the express written consent of the other party to this Agreement. Upon your execution of acceptance below, this letter shall constitute an agreement between you and Miller do Schroeder. MILLER do SCHROEDER MUNICIPALS, INC. By W12.1e4q,'j re Its "Ifyli1lnit dwliLFh1Le- Accepted this _ _ l J day of Jl(41 WA -Y 1984. TOMARK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 0r'/JN,< f �,<. 'Cr By Its Q<�J 1" Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Nineteen SPECIAL PERMIT/JAMES B. HORNE FOR SEMI -TRAILER F. James B. Horne for a Special Permit to Allow a Semi -Trailer to be used for Storage at 3850 Coronation Road -- Mr. James Horne has made an application for a special permit to allow a semi -trailer to be used for storage on his property located adjacent to Pilot Knob Road and Coronation Road. Mr. Horne's mail order business is expanding and additional storage is required if the business is to be continued on his property. For additional information on this. item, refer to the City Planner's report, a copy is enclosed on page(s) 1140 -kQ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special permit request by' James B. Horne to allow a semi -trailer to be used for storage at 3850 Coronation Road. 1aS • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT FOR PARKING OF A SEMI -TRAILER FOR STORAGE APPLICANT: JAMES B. HORNE, HORNE DEVELOPMENT CO. LOCATION: 3850 CORONATION ROAD IN PART OF THE NE; OF THE NE4 OF SECTION 21 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 7, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 3, 1984 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a special permit in order to park a semi -trailer to be used for stor- age located at 3850 Coronation Road in part of the NEh of the NE; of Section 21. �ji7ufu�� 1�1T.� Mr. Horne has contacted the City and is requesting that he be allow- ed to place a semi -trailer on his property which in turn would be used for storage of books in regard to his mail-order business for aircraft literature and publications located at 3850 Coronation Road. Mr. Horne has indicated that the volume of business which he is pre- sently conducting has created a shortage of storage space for his per- iodicals and books which people are requesting from the mail-order catalog he distributes. Therefore, Mr. Horne has requested that the City allow him to park a trailer on his property where he can store books until they are distributed to his mail-order business. In review of this particular location, Mr. Horne has submitted a site plan showing the proposed location of the trailer in relationship to his home and existing roadway. It appears that the closest neighbor is approximately 3001, or a block away, from the proposed location. This is why Mr. Horne is requesting that he be allowed to park a trail- er for storage on his property. Staff has discussed with him the possibilities of rental space in other locations of the City and other alternatives other than parking a trailer on the property. Mr. Horne has indicated that erecting an additional building on the property or storage off the property would be prohibitive for this type of storage at the present time. He would like to use the trailer as a temporary measure to determine if the business is going to keep up this type of volume, and if so, would then relocate or request the zoning change where the business would • be compatible with the type of zoning the City requires. If approved, the special permit should be subject to the following conditions: X1(0 CITY OF EAGAN SPECIAL PERMIT - JAMES B. HORNE FEBRUARY 7, 1984 PAGE TWO 1) A one-year time frame be placed on this special permit. 2) The trailer should be in a location where it will be screened from the existing residents. 3) There be no other type of storage facilities allowed on this. property. 4) All other ordinances shall be adhered to. DCR/jach ►a7 • is • $,el I / I di Pli m ENTIOPP"73AM 0 fj 0 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Twenty 11 • SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE/EAGAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY G. Michael C. 8 Joan M. Gresser, Eagan Construction Company, Inc. for a 4.4 Foot Side Setback Variance in an I-1 District Located in Sibley Terminal Industrial Park -- It was discovered by the Building Inspection Department that a side setback variance would be required for the Michael Gresser project that was recently approved for platting and industrial revenue financing on Lot 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Drive and Terminal Drive. For additional information on this item, refer to the City Planner's report, copies enclosed on page(s) 131 — 1 3 S ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the side setback variance as requested by Mr. Gresser representing Eagan Construction Company. i 3 L CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: MICHAEL C & JOAN M GRESSER, EAGAN CONSTRUC- TION CO. LOCATION: LOT 11, BLOCK 1, SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK IN SECTION 8 EXISTING ZONING: I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 7, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 2, 1984 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted request- ing approximately a 9 foot side setback variance from Lot 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. COMMENTS Mr. Gresser has submitted a..site plan to the City for a building per- mit for a new office -warehouse facility. In this particular plan, • the applicant met all of the City's requirements except that the side setback proposed was 15'� feet and the ordinance for an I-1 District requires a 20' side setback. In this process, the applicant thought he had met all of the criteria and started to construct footings for this particular building. When the Building Department reviewed the building plan, they noticed that the building did not meet the side setback requirement of 20 feet. Therefore, a variance is being re- quested. In review of the detailed plan, it appears that the applicant has met all of the other criteria for an industrial building with the excep- tion of this variance. In looking to the property adjacent this lot, it is vacant and owned by E. L. Murphy. It appears that this 5 -foot variance would not cause a problem at this particular time for site distance or spacing between buildings. In, review of the entire plan, the new building would contain 29,964 square feet and total building coverage would be approximately 258. The applicant is proposing the parking around the sides of the build- ing, and in the future, hopefully will be proposing to vacate -a por- tion of Yankee Doodle Road north of Terminal Drive and turn it into a private street where a landscaping and a nice entrance could be constructed to this facility. In addition, it appears that the lot line is a little askew and the variance on the front portion (or the area toward Terminal Drive) is . approximately 155 feet, and as you -get north of the property toward 131 CITY OF EAGAN MICHAEL C GRESSER, EAGAN CONSTRUCTION - VARIANCE • FEBRUARY 7,, 1984. PAGE TWO the back of the building, the variance is less than 5 feet. If approved, the variance should.be subject to the following condi- tions: 1) All other applicable ordinances shall be adhered to. DCR/jach • • 131 • ,� 4r� ._ (755"S9'.._��♦ wee ._' CG \ D E 9 �'`�, C �P �tiP b I �Aa �r I .n i • �1 .....i1.'I��iir'nJ�JISQt•L�:�1Ft`'G�YIe�lli�''�:l.yr�a � ,,..:d1::'.ru�f'i:r'; :�i�4..�' D 2w NJ 1 / : I WZ IVO / 10 a O� PART OFF OUTLOT A OHO i. .6u AL µ ` I kl.. A. L31 n n + -r - UN CLUB ~� -�, - / PO - LAKE- hh I. EHNDE L 1 Ll ��n•� MEADO r. PARC A L Isr ADD CO;MSERV tam Vmo■ �pll�,.lnW�i.■..■..■� I L61_ No a R-4 R-4 PK r, FOXwmi RIDGE ' N,uzB N B 64 --- 8UBJEC _ mfm .6u AL µ ` I kl.. A. L31 n n + -r - UN CLUB ~� -�, - / PO - LAKE- hh I. EHNDE L 1 Ll ��n•� MEADO r. PARC A L Isr ADD CO;MSERV tam Vmo■ �pll�,.lnW�i.■..■..■� I No a R-4 R-4 PK r, FOXwmi RIDGE ' N,uzB N B Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -One FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/KENSINGTON PLACE A. Final Plat Approval, Kensington Place (Tomark Development) -- The Public Works Director has received a request from the developer to continue consideration of this final plat approval until a later date. The developer was not able to meet the deadline for final plat application for those items relating to the financial guarantee. While it is anticipated that they .:iii be requesting final plat approval at the February 21 meeting, they have requested an indefinite continuance. • • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue final plat consideration for Kensington Place to a later date. 13(a Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two CONTRACT 84-2/WESCOTT ROAD TRUNK SANITARY SEWER B. Contract 84-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Wescott Road Trunk Sanitary Sewer) -- On October 5, 1982, the public hearing was closed and Project 361 was approved which provided for the installation of trunk sanitary sewer to Lexington Avenue by Wescott Road. Preparation of detailed plans and specifi- cations were authorized subject to conclusion of acquisition of easements or a guarantee for all costs to be incurred to be the responsibility of the developer(s). At the December 6, 1983, council meeting, the Cit: Council approved an agreement whereby Lexington South Incorporated would accept all costs associated with the easement acquisition up to a maximum of $60,000. Subsequently, detailed plans and specifications have now been completed and are being presented to the City Council for a review along with a request for authorization to advertise for a bid opening to be held on March 2. Our consulting engineer, Mr. Bob Rosene, and the Public Works Director will be available to discuss the details of these plans with the Council if there are any specific questions. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans and specifications for Contract 84-2 and advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 9:30 A March 2, 1984. 137 the detailed authorize the .M. on Friday, • • • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -Three ACT 84-5/FIRE ADMINISTRATION PARKING LOT C. Contract 84-5, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Fire Administration Parking Lot) -- As a part of the new Municipal Center bond referendum, the old City Hall was to be renovated to provide for the new Fire Administration and Divine Redeemer ambulance services. As a part of this renovation, it was found desirable to upgrade the parking lot to City standards through a separate City contract. Subsequently, the Engineering Division has designed a new parking lot layout and prepared detailed specifications for the solicitation of bids. The Public Works Director will present these plans for the Council's review and will respond to any specific questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans and specifications for Contract 84-5 and authorize the advertisement for the bid opening to be held at 10:30 A.M. on Thursday, March 1, 1984. CONTRACT 83-09/CEDAR GROVE 1ST 8 2ND ADDITIONS D. Contract 83-09, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Grove 1st and 2nd Additions - Street Reconstruction) -- We have received • a request for the sixth and final payment to Contract 83-09 which provided for the street reconstruction/rehabilitation of Cedar Grove 1st and 2nd Additions. This request for final payment is processed through our consulting engineering firm along with a recommendation and certification that the project was completed in accordance with City approved plans and specifica- tions. While the final contract amount exceeded the bid proposal by 1.58 ($10,313) due to an overrun in driveway and boulevard restoration materials, the final contract amount was 5.48 ($40,212) below the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on February 1, 1983. Any corrective work remaining to be performed will be adequately covered under the warranty provisions of this contract. E Therefore, the Public Works Director is recommending that the City Council formally approve the sixth and final payment and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. It is anticipated that this final assessment hearing will be held during the next three-four months. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the sixth and final payment for Contract 83-09 for $4,100 to McNamara - Vivant Construction Inc. and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. 13$ Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four r - HRA MEETING A. HRA Meeting to Review School District 197 and Dakota County Responses to the Tax Increment Financing Plan and HRA Supplemental Agreement -- Procedurally the City Council will need to suspend the regular City Council meeting and meet formally as an HRA authority to act on the following agenda items: 1. Report on Dakota County and Independent School District. 197 action regarding the tax increment financing plan for redevelopment district #1. 2. Consider the adoption of a resolution approving formation of tax increment district pursuant to redevelopment plan and tax increment financing plan for redevelopment district #1. 3. Consider supplemental cooperation agreement between the Dakota County HRA and City of Eagan. 4. The Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Program. The HRA Executive Director /City Administrator Hedges will present all three items for HRA Board approval. The first item listed • above regarding a report on the action by Dakota County and Independent School District 197 consists of a letter and unanimous County Board approval supporting the City of Eagan's tax increment financing plan. A copy of that letter and action is enclosed on pages 140 through I4-1 _ The City has received no response from Independent School District 197 regarding the tax increment financing plan. The County Board and school district notification does not require any formal action by the HRA Board. A resolution has been prepared by the City's bond counsel entitled "Resolution Approving Formation of Tax Increment District Pursuant to Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevel- opment District 41". A copy of that resolution is enclosed on pages 14r2,through 14T for HRA Board consideration. Action is to be considered on the approval of this resolution which provides all the conditions for considering the redevelopment plan and tax increment financing plan. Recently the City Council approved a cooperation agreement with the Dakota County HRA to qualify the City of Eagan for the Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Program. Due to the fact the City has an HRA, the Dakota County HRA must request a supplemental cooperation agreement from the City's HRA as a procedural matter to further qualify for the Entitlement CDBG Program. This action is procedural and regarding as a function • of the HRA. A copy of that letter and agreement is enclosed on pages 146 through 14!j for City Council review. 139 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -Five • Following actions by the HRA, the official Housing Redevelopment Authority meeting would then adjourn and the City Council can resume the regular City Council meeting for additional business. 139 0. • 1 DAKOTA COUNTY 1 •DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 HWY. 33 - HASTINGS. MINNESOTA 55033 • • January 23, 1984 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City of Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Sir: JAN 2 % ;84 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE 612.437-0416 I am forwarding, for your information, a copy of Resolution No. 84-46 covering action taken by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners relating to the City of Eagan's Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevelopment District #1. S'ncerely, zale_i oan L. Ken all Deputy Administrator JLK:ja Enclosure COMMISSIONERS - 1+0 •O AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER IST DISTRICT2ND DISTRICT 3RD DISTRICT 4TH DISTRICT STH DISTRICT JOSEPH A. HARRIS GERALD E. HOLLENKAMP JOHN S. VOSS STEVEN LOEDING RUSSELL STREEFLAND HASTINGS SOUTH ST. PAUL BURNSVILLE INVER GROVE HEIGHTS BURNSVILLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA Date....Ja nua ry._ 17.,.._1984 Resolution No. ..-,..—..,-- • Motion by Commisaioner...._LOedtng _. H011enkamp„ Seconded by Commissioner. WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has submitted the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevelopment District #1 to Dakota County for review. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That Dakota County acknowledges receipt and review of an outline of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan, and directs the County Administrator to notify the City of this action. E YES NO Harris X Harris Hollenkamp X Hollenkemp Voss X Voss Loading X Loeding Streeflend X Streefland State of Minnesota ss County of Dakota - I. C. D. Onischuk, duly elected. Qualified and acting County Auditor of the County of Dakota. State of Minnesota. do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution with the original minutes of the proceeding of the BoaFeTeof. unty Commissioners, Dakota County, Minnesota, at their • session held on the _/'.7....�_.._....day oL...........19. `�... now on file in my office, and have found the same to be a true and correct copy Witness my hand and official seal at Hastings. Minnesota, this . _. day C*=17 Audtt= Ll • Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eagan, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eagan, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on , the day of 1984, at o'clock, .M. The following Commissioners were present: and the following were absent: Commissioner introduced the following written resolution and moved its adoption: HRA RESOLUTION No. RESOLUTION APPROVING FORMATION OF TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners has approved a Redevelopment Plan and a Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevelopment District No. 1 of the City of Eagan; WHEREAS, the Tax Increment Financing Plan and the Redevelopment Plan have been approved by the City Council of the City of Eagan after a public hearing duly called and held thereon; WHEREAS, an appraisal of the property within the proposed district prepared by J.E. Parranto Associates, Inc. has been submitted to the Authority expressing an opinion as to the • value of the property before and after preparation of the site for redevelopment; 14IL- n L WHEREAS, the Authority has presented to the members of the Dakota County Board of Commissioners and the members of the school board of the school district in which Redevelopment District No. 1 is located its estimate of the fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district and provided an opportunity for such members to meet with the Authority; WHEREAS, 30 days has passed from the date of transmittal by the Authority of the information regarding such fiscal and economic implications and this Board has reviewed the comments submitted by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners; and WHEREAS, -the Authority is authorized to create a tax increment financing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.71 to 273.78, as amended, for the purpose of financ- ing the project described in the Redevelopment Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: 4+ 1. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: • (1) the land in the project area would not be made available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought; (2) the redevelopment plans for the redevelopment areas in the locality will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the locality as a whole, for the redevelopment of such areas by private enterprise; (3) the redevelopment plan conforms to a general plan for the development for the locality as a whole; (4) the proposed tax increment financing district is a redevelopment district in that less than 70 percent of the parcels of property in the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements, but due to hilly terrain conditions requiring substantial filling, grading and other physical preparation for use at least 80 percent of the total acreage of such land has a fair market value upon inclusion in the district which, when added to the estimated cost of preparing that land for development, excluding costs directly related to roads defined in Section 160.01, Minnesota Statutes and local improvements described in Chapters 429 and 430, Minnesota Statutes, exceeds its anticipated • fair market value after completion of -said preparation; 4+ 0 (5) the proposed development or redevelopment would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foresee- able future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary; (6) the tax increment financing plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole; and (7) the tax increment financing plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the project by private enterprise. The reasons and supporting facts for each of the above determina- tions are as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plan, in the appraisal referred to above and in other estimates and reports on file with the City and the Authority. 2. The Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed and there shall be created a redevelopment district and a tax increment financing district as provided therein and the Authority shall undertake the • project described in the Redevelopment Plan through the use of tax increment financing. E 3. The Authority shall request certification of the original assessed valuation of the tax increment district as described in the tax increment financing plan by the County Auditor at such time as the property in the district is selected as the site for a class A horse racing track by the Minnesota Racing Commission and upon completion of a satisfactory develop- ment agreement between the Authority and a developer of the property in the district. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. /44 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) SS. CITY OF EAGAN I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Executive Director of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eagan, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a meeting of the Board of Commissioners held , 1984 with the original thereof on file and of record in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete • transcript therefrom. • Witness My hand officially and the seal of the Authority this day of , 1984. 45� Executive Director DAKOTA.COUPITY ..:. HRA Serving People and Communities December 22, 1983 Tom Hedges, Administrator/Manager City of Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Tom: DEC 2 7, X983 DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2496- 145th STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612.423-4800 The County Attorney's Office and HUD have determined that a Supplemental Cooperation Agreement needs to be executed between the County and each of the six municipal HRAs that exist in Dakota County to clarify potential activity implementation options and to insure the municipal HRAs' cooperation, as needed, with'the, Entitlement CDBG program. I would appreciate it very much if this action could be taken up at the Eagan • HRA's next Board meeting. The document to be executed, of which I will need three originally signed copies, is attached. I will also need a certified coov of the portion of the minutes authorizing the action. Please let me know if you have any questions on this and/or wish me to be pre- sent at the meeting. I do appreciate all the support Eagan has given this new program. SiSi er Carol Schultz Executive Director CS:lz Attachment • /46 "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" .% h • SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR THE DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of EAGAN Housing and Redevelopment Authority, hereinafter referred to as the "Local HRA". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County and the City of EAGAN hereinafter "City",- have entered into a Joint Cooperation Agreement for the Dakota County Development Block Grant Program (to which this Supplemental Agreement is attached); and WHEREAS, the Local HRA is a duly organized municipal housing and redevelopment authority pursuant to Minn. Stat. • §462.411, et. seq.; and WHEREAS, the County and the Local HRA wish to clarify their relationship in light of the aforementioned Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and County. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The Local HRA acknowledges and agrees to be bound by all terms and conditions of the aforementioned Joint Cooperation Agreement between the County and the City insofar as it relates to the duties, responsibilities and obligations of the Local HRA under Minn. Stat. §462.411, et. seq. • Page 1 of 3 /47 -. ~ • 2. The County through the Dakota County HRA, its administrative agent for purposes of receipt and distribution of Community Development Block Grant Funds, agrees to cooperate with the Local HRA and coordinate expenditure of any Community Development Block Grant Funds which are expended within the City to the extent necessary to accomplish specified project objectives. 3. The Local HRA agrees to allow expenditure of Community Development Block Grant Funds received by the County pursuant to the aforementioned Joint Cooperation Agreement and this Supplemental Agreement within the City and agrees to cooperate with the County and/or the Dakota County HRA to the extent necessary to accomplish specified project objectives. • This cooperation shall include: (1) execution of an Administrative Services Contract with the Dakota County HRA and/or the County whereby the Local HRA agrees to assume all obligations of the Dakota County HRA under its Administrative Services Agreement with the County for purposes of the Community Development Block Grant Program if said Local HRA desires to administer expenditure of such funds within the City; or Page 2 of 3 W - 1TZ n U (2) passing a resolution by its governing body authorizing the Dakota County HRA to act as the County's administrative agent for purposes of expenditure of Community Development Block Grant Funds within the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed. Approved ajs, t((o?? form: %`\•Ct.lhtf,l. C L7:f'�/..;I>ii1,• 12-I'J�b AA�tant County Attorney Date Approved as to execution: Assistant County Attorney Date Approved by Dakota County Board Resolution No. This instrument drafted by: JCB COUNTY OF DAKOTA STATE OF MINNESOTA By Russell L. Streefland, Chairman Board of Commissioners Date of Signature Attest Carl D. Onischuk, Auditor Date of Signature Dakota County Attorney's Office Dakota County Government Center 1560 Highway 55 CITY OF EAGAN Hastings, Minnesota 55033 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Telephone: (612) 437-0438 • C-83-587 by/m By Its Date of Signature By its Date of Signature Page 3 of 3 Ibt9 • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1984 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION MEMO/FEBRUARY 7, 1984 COUNCIL MEETING After approval of the January 17, 1984 regular City Council minutes and the agenda for the February 7, 1984 City Council meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: Mr. Bill Peterson, Dakota County Assessor's Office, is planning to present a property owner's request for a tax abatement to the City Council on Tuesday. Mr. Peterson has informed the City Ad- ministrator that the County is recommending denial of this tax abatement. Enclosed on pages I through 3 are copies of of the information supplied by Mr. Peterson and a map indicating the location of the property. The applicant, Mrs. JoAnne D. Lemmer, has been contacted and will probably be present at the City Council meeting. •ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an abate- ment as applied for by Mrs. JoAnne Lemmer for 1801 Turquoise Trail. �6 q0 IL a (9a, 0 • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1984 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE A reminder that our Open House is scheduled for this Sunday from 1 to 3 p.m. The actual ribbon cutting and ceremony will be at ap- proximately 2:00 p.m. The informative memo will be forthcoming on Monday with the Adminis- trative Agenda for your leisurely review. Y��V�IMJ J� City Administrator TLH/hnd 10 ►r\ •REGULAR MEETING AGENDA, EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA • 0 CITY HALL FEBRUARY 7, 1984 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 11. 6:33 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES \ III. 6:35 - ABATEMENT - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE Q IV. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS 4 A. Fire Department C. Park & Recreation Department B. Police Department D. Public Works Department V. CONSENT ITEMS (One motion approves all items) g\\ A. Contractors' License Renewals 1t1B. St. John Neumann Church for a Temporary Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor Q License for March,16,_1984 (St. Patrick's,Dance) n 1rbC. Project 395, Authorize Feasibility Report - Lexington Ave. Booster \ Station & Trunk Water Main Q,?� D. Authorize Review & Update of Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan 22E. Project 396, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Westbury Q' Addition) 03- F. Proj. 397, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Denmark Ave. -Streets & Utilities) VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS 'Z10A. Street Vacation - Old Lexington Ave. South of Diffley Road e (County Road 30) VII. OLD BUSINESS P 1% A. Timberline Civic Association Request to Review Level of Noise Emission at Sperry Q•31B. Request for Reconsideration of Liquor License Policy Change 3rj C. Off - Sale Liquor License Application, Perrier & Associates, Q• Inc., for Hilltop PLaza (Pilot Knob and Diffley Roads) t Eagan City Council Agenda February 7, 1984 • Page -Two VIII. NEW BUSINESS brO A. Michael Construction, Inc., Michael N. Monson, for a Preliminary Plat, HilLandale Addition No. 2, Consisting of Approximately 12.58 Acres and Containing Approximately 125 Dwelling Units Located in Parts of Lot 2, Block 1, Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot A, HillandaLe No. 1 in Section 20 (East of Blackhawk Road and North of Diffley Road) -1'6B. Lexington South, Inc., Jim Curry, for an Amendment to the Q Lexington South Planned Development to Exchange Land Uses on Two Parcels Within the Lexington South Planned Development in Part of the Wk of the W� of Sec. 23 `6S C. Roger Kreidberg, RLK Corp., for a Preliminary Plat, The Pines. Q Consisting of Approximately 3.65 Acres Containing 26 Condominium Units on Lot 11, Block 3, Hilltop Estates, Section 22, Directly North of Berry Ridge Road & East of Pilot Knob Road \\O D. Larry D. Peterson, The Rental Place, for a Conditional Use BPylon Business Sign Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McCray Addition in Section 19 \\1E. Request for, Preliminary Resolution to Consider $6,000,000 Multi -Family Housing Development Revenue Bond Issue/Carriage • Hills Apartment Project %5F. James B. Horne.for a Special Permit to Allow a Semi -Trailer to be Used for Storage at 3850 Coronation Road in part of the NEk of the NEk of Section 21 n\)DG. Michael C. & Joan M. Gresser, Eagan Construction Co., Inc. \ for a 4.4 Foot Side Setback Variance in a I-1 (Light Industrial District) Located at Lot 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park in the Northwest Corner of Yankee Doodle Drive & Terminal Drive in Section 8. IX. ADDITIONAL ITEMS p A. Final Plat Approval, Kensington Place (Tomark Development) ` 1'57 B. Contract 84-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids Q (Wescott Road Trunk Sanitary Sewer) e.\`%C. Contract 85-5, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Fire Administration Parking Lot) NJDD.,IQ Contract 83-09, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Grove 1st & Q 2nd Additions - Street Reconstruction) X. HRA MEETING D \'�t A. HRA Meeting to Review School District 197 and Dakota County `^ Responses to the Tax Increment Financing Plan & HRA Supplemental Agreement X1. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (For Those Persons Not On the Agenda) • XII. ADJOURNMENT 4 va , February 7, 1984 • JoAnne D. Lemmer---Abatement request 1801 Turquoise Trail Eagan, City of I.D. #10-16704-010-01 • • Mrs. Lemmer has requested an abatement upon the advice of her realtor. It is their opinion that the property was over -valued in relationship to other similar properties. 2 N — O m v • I BURNSV/LIE ••� © a a• ea p9 � ,a a µ • N "�i �E i RR 1 F m � , s :i'Le..{ ^.i � ora Rf • ey •`4a o rP`vb _ I a..ul � _ �r4. _..... :k,4? �`t _ a r •I "1 °\9 I�` �%La� ., R.RipC rows , N IN cii•. R,C .iV. ncx 4LDC yYk. FryS.y'( © uuY `'s._ `v/F/ ._... '7 a. _. .. le,c •—Z/��/� _�— si°`?�?uc� y'f�'�t>).�c q "0.q ` u [ � � , s T I �•} / " rT�r� ! "•O•� s",l : • :\4r eo .n iti R .m. m,•u •vs �Of� I.rwRr< i� P u.f r+ r� • � 3 0+ C$, • •• � s �Yi.� raw.[ _ .� Posf. -S • it UI4.19 ii .,0• I PW .,? IIP a RP ` �♦♦\ S er � Ntflr ,.LY ��r .,F ;n ne i G 4 tee• c`t;; 9 .ws.• 3 bl F ��., �� a .aI10 ' s1Rs.B[ .ipLRla , U pVl � 'I- 1 , • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Two • L FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- During the fall of 1983, the City Council asked that an analysis by made regarding manpower needs for each of t`:e three fire stations. The Citv Adminstrator indicated that the Fire Chief and two district captains were working on a report that would be presented at the February 7, 1984 City Council meeting. The City Administrator met with Fire Chief Childers on Thursday, February 2, 1984, to discuss the report in detail that was prepared by fire administration. Fire Chief Childers and Dis- trict Chiefs Southorn and Shildeldecker will be present to discuss the manpower report in more detail at the meeting on Tuesday. En- closed on page S is a copy of the manpower report as prepared by Fire Chief Childers which addresses minimum response for each station and the current breakdown for manpower as it relates to all three stations. There is no formal action required on this matter. Also enclosed and referenced as pages & through 7 are copies of monthly reports for the Eagan Volunteer Fire Depart- ment for the months of September and October. 0 Oe MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1984 SUBJECT: VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MANP014ER REPORT The following information was prepared by Fire Chief Childers for the purpose of re- viewing: 1) Current Manpower 2) Minimum Response for Each Station CURRENT MANPOWER The following is a MINIMUM response for each station: Station 1 1 - TOTAL Daytime Night Swing Medical Leave Station 1 28 13 12 2 1 Station 2 23 4 15 3 1 Station 3 16 3 9 4 - TOTALS 67 20 36 9 2 The following is a MINIMUM response for each station: Station 1 1 - Dispatcher 10 - To Man Only 2 Trucks 3 - Rescue • Station 2 1 - Dispatcher 10'- To Man 2 Pumpers 3 - Rescue Station 3 5 - To Man 1 Pumper 3 - Rescue 1 - Dispatcher *Could be eliminated if "all call" - but probably needed to fill air bottles, etc. If we could assume a 70% response, the absolute minimum requirement would be Station 1 18.2 Day 6 Night 36.4 Station 2 18.2 36.4 Station 3 11.7 11.7 84.5 Because of shift overlap and days off, etc., we could operate as follows: Station 1 30 Station 2 30 Station 3 15 75 • The 75 manpower total includes the Fire Chief and District Chiefs. IaA City Administrator S TH/jj EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT V / FOR MONTH OF September, 1983 11 WORK PERFORMED TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 760 Training 391 Truck 6 Equipment Maintenance 120 Station Maintenance 114 Fire Prevention 110 Administrative 227 TOTAL 1722 $ LOSS MANPOWER STATION 01 STATION 02 STATION 03 Available Days 12 7 6 Available Nights 13 14 1p Available Rotating 3 4 Medical Leave --T — _ I TOTAL 30 26 16 • FIRE/RESCUE TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS Structure 9 $15,100.00 Grass 1 Vehicle 1 1,800.00 False 7 Medical 16 Other 4 TOTAL 38 $16,900.00 LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS 9-26-83 Hwy. 13 & 28 Car $ 1,800.00 9-27-83 3155 Hwy 13 House 15,000.00 E (o Revised 1-1-83 _.� EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF October. 1983 • WORK PERFORMED TYPE MAN HOURS c� Fire/Rescue 730 $ LOSS Training 465 $3,100.00 Truck d Equipment Maintenance 150 Station Maintenance 150 Fire Prevention 188 Administrative 344 Other 6 TOTAL 2027 $3,100.00 MANPOWER STATION 01 STATION 02 STATION 03 Available Days 12 7 6 Available Nights 13 14 —�— Available Rotating 3 4 Medical Leave 2 1 TOTAL 30 26 16 • FIRE/RESCUE TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS Structure 8 $3,100.00 Grass Vehicle False 6 Medical 16 Other 6 TOTAL 36 $3,100.00 LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS 10-28-83 Olsen 2850 Pilot Knob Home $3,000.00 • 7 Revised 1-1-83 Agenda Information Memo • February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Eleven OLD BUSINESS` NOISE EMISSION AT SPERRY / A. Timberline Civic Association Request to Review Level of Noise Emission at Sperry -- City staff members, including the City A.ttcr- ney, have met on several occasions with representatives of the Spefry Corporation and Timberline Civic Association in an effort to resolve noise that is being emitted from Sperry's ventilating systemat the semi conductor facility. The Sperry Corporation has proposed to correct the noise emission stacks by a method that they hope will reduce the noise level so there is no impact on the Tim- berline neighborhood. It was necessary to design specifications and construct devices that would modify the stacks to reduce the noise emission which apparently takes several weeks and would not be completed until sometime this spring. The Timberline Civic Asso- ciation has not been in agreement with Sperry's method to resolve the issue and feels that: 1. The noise is intolerable and they want immediate correction • and/or enforcement by the City, and 2. That if the noise devices do not reduce the noise level substantially this spring, the Timberline Civic Association will be hearing the noise at a higher level once windows are opened during the spring and summer months. John Gustin, president of the Timberline Civic Association, has submitted a letter to the City, a copy is enclosed on page 1 formally requesting that the City Council review this item on th r formal agenda at the February 7, 1984 meeting. Also, Mr. Tom Niko- lai has submitted a letter dated January 24, 1984, a copy of which is enclosed on page, which offers a collection of letters and other data pertaining to the issue that he feels would be help- ful for the City Council to review prior to the meeting on Tuesday. This information is enclosed in the folder in your packet without page number. There are no additional letters to be offered by the City Administrator, realising the Mr. Nikolai has essentially copied all the correspondence between the City, Sperry and the Timberline Association. The information has been given to the City Attorney for his review as well. There is no specific action to recommend on this particular agenda item. ✓ \S 10 -C o • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1964 City Council Meeting Page Three POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered at this time under Police Department. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT C. =arks & Recreation Department -- The advisory Parks a Recreation Commission has been reviewing, at the request of the City Council, suggested names for all City parks located in the City of Eagan. Since many of the parklands in Eagan have not been formally named, it was the intention of the park department, at the request of the City Council, to formally name these parkland areas. The parks and recreation commission has completed the study and has a list of recommended park names for consideration by the City Council. Enclosed on pages 9 through /0 is a list of names as recom- mended by the commission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the list of park names as recommended by the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission. • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Pi D. Public Works Department -- There are no items to be considered under the Public Works Department at this time. C .MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR a CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JANUARY 20; 1984 SUBJECT: ADVISORY PARKS 8 RECREATION COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION - PARK NAMES As you are aware, the Advisory Commission has spent over a year reviewing lists of suggested names for -City parks. Many of the parklands in Eagan have not formally been named, but given name designation for easy identification while dealing with developers or development plats. Many of these identification names have stuck to the park areas and are often inappropriate as it relates to the features of the park or its location in the community. The Advisory Commission established a sub -committee to review these names and make a recommendation for official naming of the parks. As part of the process, the sub -committee solicited suggestions from the community wherever possible. While the response was not overwhelming to the various flyers requesting suggestions, the sub -committee did show a preference for those names suggested by respondents for several park areas. Where residents' response was not conclusive, the committee attempted to select names which had some historical significance or related to a geographical fea- ture. The committee is recommending the following names: Currently Known As Oak Chase Northview Thomas Lake Carnelian Capricorn Coachman Ches Mar Cinnamon Ridge Country Home Heights DeBoer Donnywood Fish Lake Hill Top Pilot Knob Ridge Cliff Wedgewood Windtree Woodhaven Meadowlands Hi Line • Schwanz Lake W Recommended Name Oak Chase Park Dewa-i-Rg Athletic Fields✓k\t;&'V1k-3 Thomas Lake Qo-� Carnelian Park Goat Hill Park ✓ 5° eo a 4. �ers Park✓Q Robb ms's Ravine Park✓ � Cinnamon Park Country Home Park O'Leary Park 8aJ,9y_CnrFl- Park ✓a ow eW ►Qum Fish Lake Park Berry Patch Park Pilot Knob Park Ridgecliff Park Walnut Hill Park Wescott Station Park Woodhaven Park Meadowland Park iregger5 Trail Trapp Farm Park ✓ ow January 20, 1984 • Page 2 The City Council is asked to approve those park names that they are in agreement with for official name designation. Should there be names which the Council is in disagreement with or would like further information, those parks could be struck from the list for further.consideration. KV/kf • ano xecrea �0 Agenda Information Memo • February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Four There are six (6) items on the agenda referred to as the Consent Agenda requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council desires to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the consent agenda and placed under addit.onal items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTORS' LICENSE RENEWALS A. Contractors' License Renewals -- Annual renewal of contractors' licenses for 1984 was scheduled for the January 17, 1984 City Coun- cil agenda. However, due the change in bonding requirements, it was necessary to continue this item until the February 7 City Coun- cil meeting to allow for correct documentation to be submitted to the City by the contractors seeking renewals. The list of contrac- tors seeking renewals is enclosed on pages I?- through / . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the contractors' license renewal list for 1984. • L 0 February '2, 1984 MEMO TO: (TO DGES,—CITY—ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL RE: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE PER CITY CODE 6.42 The following lists of contractors have been doing work in the City of Eagan in the seven county metro area and are considered reliable. They have submitted the necessary documents and fees and I would recommend that they be licensed to be a contractor in the City of Eagan. DP/js • • 12 HEATING, VENTILATION. REFRIGERATION & AIR CONDITIONING • 1. A -ABC APPLIANCE & HEATING 2. AIR COMFORT 3. ALLEN HEATING 4. ALLIED METALCRAFT 5. BERGHORST PLUMBING 6. BINDER, A. & SON INC. 7.. BOSTROM SHEET METAL 8. CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING 9. CONSOLIDATED PLUMBING & HEATING 10. DEPENDABLE HTG. & AIR COND. 11. DESS SOLAR COMPANY 12. DRONEN'S HTG. & AIR COND. 13. EGAN & SONS • 14. FAIRCON INC. 15. FREDRICKSON HTG. & AIR COND. 16. GENZ-RYAN PLBG. & HTG. CO. 17. GOPHER HTG. & SHEET METAL 18. HARRIS MECHANICAL 19. HOFFMAN INC. 20. HORWITZ INC. 21. J & B SHEET METAL 22. LARSON - MAC COMPANY 23. METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC. 24. NOEL'S HTG. & AIR COND. 25. PEINE PLBG. & HTG. 26. QUALITY REFRIGERATION & MECH. • 27. R & S HTG. 28. SBS MECHANICAL 13 HEATING, VENTILATION, REFRIGERATION & AIR CONDITIONING • 29. SEASONAL CONTROL INC. 30. SNELLING COMPANY, THE 31. SOUTHSIDE HTG. & AIR COND. 32. STANDARD HTG. & AIR COND. 33. STREITZ HTG. & COOLING 34. VOGT & COMPANY 35. WELTER, RAY HTG. 36, YALE INC. V l GENERAL CONTRACTORS - 1984 1. ARVIDSON BLUR. INC. 30. STIKBILT CONSTRUCTION • 2. B & K NEW CONCEPT HOMES INC. 31. T.M.J. BUILDERS 3. BRUTGER COMPANY 32. TILLGES CONSTRUCTION CO. 4. CKC CONSTRUCTION, INC. 33. TILSEN HOMES 5. DMH CONSTRUCTION 34. TIMBERLINE BLDRS., INC. 6. DACO INC. 35. TOLLEFSON BLURS. 7. DESIGN CONSULTANT 36. VALLEY INVESTMENTS 8. EAGAN CONSTRUCTION 37. VESTA CONSTRUCTION 9. ENVIROTECH HOMES 38. VOGELPOHL CONSTRUCTION 10. F & N GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC. 39. WACHTER, TED CONSTRUCTION 11. GUSTAFSON 6 ASSOC. CONSTRUCTION CO. 40. WATSON BLDG. & REMODELING 12. HANS HAGEN HOMES, INC. 41. WEIKLE & SONS 13. HOGAN HOME BUILDER 42. WESTERN CONSTRUCTION CO. 14. HUTTNER, WILLIAM 43. WOODSON DEVELOPMENT • 15. KRANZ, D.J. COMPANY INC. 44. ZACHMAN HOMES 16. LEES, BRUCE BUILDER INC. 17. 'LOVERING ASSOCIATES 18. M S M HOME SERVICES INC. 19. MCMAHON CONSTRUCTION 20. MITTELSTAEDT, D.F. CONSTRUCTION 21. MORTENSON COMPANY 22. OAK CHASE BLDRS. 23. OPUS CORPORATION 24. OXFORD CONSTRUCTION INC. 25. OZMUN-PEDERSON 26. PETERSEN, SVEND CONSTRUCTION INC. • 27. PLYMOUTH SERVICES 28. RIVERWOOD HOMES 29. ROSEWOOD CONSTRUCTION �S INSULATION • 1. ORV BAKKE INSULATION lv4FYoriffime0ila 9 WILLIAM BUNN FIREPLACE CONSTRUCTION ROOFING LES JONES ROOFING C 16 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Five ST. JOHN NEUMANN CHURCH/TEMPORARY NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE B. St. John Neumann Church for a Liquor License for March 16, 1984 O'Grady, who resides at 3770 South questing a non -intoxicating liquor Neumann parish for a St. Patrick's 16, 1984. The license application by the City Council. Temporary Non -Intoxicating Malt St. Patrick's Dance -- Donald Hills Court in Eagan, is re - license on behalf of St. John Dav Dance scheduled for March is in order for consideration ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the temporary non -intoxicating malt liquor license as requested by St. John Neu- mann parish for a dance on March 16, 1984. 17 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Six PROJECT 395/AUTHORIZE FEASIBILITY REPORT C. Project 395, Authorize Feasibility Report - Lexington Avenue Booster Station & Trunk Watermain -- On January 21, 1984, the City Council authorized the purchase of 1.5 acres of land at the northwest corner of new Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road which has been designated the site of the future 5,000 G.P.M. water booster station to service our high-pressure zone. In accordance with the Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan of 1982, it was anticipated that the trunk watermain along Lexington Avenue from Wescott Road to Diffiev Road was anticipated to be phased in during 1983 in order to maintain adequate water supply to the high-pressure system in accordance with the projected growth rates. A recent analysis by a consulting engineer, Mr. Bob Rosene, indicates that this trunk watermain must be installed prior to the summer of 1985 in order to avoid potentially serious shortages of water due to the increasing growth in the high- pressure system. In order to complete this distribution system from our new treatment plant to the high-pressure zone, it is necessary to boost the pressure from the intermediate zone to the high-pressure zone. Subsequently, this necessitates the simultaneous construction of a 5,000 G.P.M. booster station as a part of this project. :, Enclosed on pages 19 ^through LO is a letter from our consultant • indicating the necessity and timing for this proposed project. Therefore, based on this information, the Public Works Director is requesting authorization to prepare a feasibility report to review the cost and potential assessments associated with this proposed project in anticipation of having a public hearing this coming spring. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 395 for the installation of a trunk watermain and booster station on Lexington Avenue. 11 4 1395 W. 9...I.4*4.196 &. p..[ M, ._ti 55119 P4a.. 612.636-4'600 February 1, 1984 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55121 Attn: Mr. Tom Colbert Re: Lexington Avenue Booster Station and Trunk Water Main Eagan, Minnesota File No. 49 Dear Tom, RECEIVED FEB 2 Am M, Gk. R. Cook, AL K.kA A. Gordan. P.E 771 m E. Nara. P.E RkMrd W. Fwt , P.E. Rohn G. SMa M. P.E Marts L Swrob, P.E. O.Nd C. RurpNr. P.E. Jap A. RRadan. P.E Mart A. Hann. P.E TM K. FW P.E Mk T. Racer.... P.E Rohm R. PRpaM, AF And L.*k P.E Chat A. &kk, LW M. PawBkr Harl.r M. 01m This will confirm our discussion with you recently relative to the need for • additional water supply 'capacity in the south area of Eagan. At the present time, all of the water being supplied to the south area of Eagan is provided through a 12" diameter trunk water main on Pilot Knob Road plus the supply provided by Deep Well No. 5 in the south well field area near Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road. During peak demand periods, the flow provided by these sources has not been 'totally adequate. With the completion of the new 4 MG Safari reservoir, we anticipate less dif- ficulty with this problem during this year than was experienced last year. However, continued growth in the south area increases the demands and we may have difficulty filling this tank over night during peak demand periods. Also, when the water treatment plant goes into operation, it would be desir- able to use Deep Well No. 5 only for standby purposes and not for a primary source of water. The solution to the problem is the installation of the' proposed trunk water main on Lexington Avenue between Wescott Road and County Road 30 and the in- stallation of the proposed booster station on Lexington Avenue near County Road 30. This would be constructed on the site which has just recently been acquired for this purpose. This trunk main and booster station should be available by the summer of 1985 to insure adequate water supply to the south end of Eagan. It is suggested that a feasibility report be authorized so that the cost esti- mates for the booster station and trunk water main can be provided together • with more accurate estimates of flow which can be obtained through the pro- posed trunk water main. We also suggest that a comparison be made of the flow Page 1. 9138b 19 aro G. RP.E p Ra km W.. Ravo., P.E. R... JexPh C. ArdMa. P.E 81Wy dA. Ln 6 7. P.E. Rklmd E. Tanen. AF Java C. Okun. P.E. M, Gk. R. Cook, AL K.kA A. Gordan. P.E 771 m E. Nara. P.E RkMrd W. Fwt , P.E. Rohn G. SMa M. P.E Marts L Swrob, P.E. O.Nd C. RurpNr. P.E. Jap A. RRadan. P.E Mart A. Hann. P.E TM K. FW P.E Mk T. Racer.... P.E Rohm R. PRpaM, AF And L.*k P.E Chat A. &kk, LW M. PawBkr Harl.r M. 01m This will confirm our discussion with you recently relative to the need for • additional water supply 'capacity in the south area of Eagan. At the present time, all of the water being supplied to the south area of Eagan is provided through a 12" diameter trunk water main on Pilot Knob Road plus the supply provided by Deep Well No. 5 in the south well field area near Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road. During peak demand periods, the flow provided by these sources has not been 'totally adequate. With the completion of the new 4 MG Safari reservoir, we anticipate less dif- ficulty with this problem during this year than was experienced last year. However, continued growth in the south area increases the demands and we may have difficulty filling this tank over night during peak demand periods. Also, when the water treatment plant goes into operation, it would be desir- able to use Deep Well No. 5 only for standby purposes and not for a primary source of water. The solution to the problem is the installation of the' proposed trunk water main on Lexington Avenue between Wescott Road and County Road 30 and the in- stallation of the proposed booster station on Lexington Avenue near County Road 30. This would be constructed on the site which has just recently been acquired for this purpose. This trunk main and booster station should be available by the summer of 1985 to insure adequate water supply to the south end of Eagan. It is suggested that a feasibility report be authorized so that the cost esti- mates for the booster station and trunk water main can be provided together • with more accurate estimates of flow which can be obtained through the pro- posed trunk water main. We also suggest that a comparison be made of the flow Page 1. 9138b 19 City of Eagan • Eagan, Mn. Re: File No. 49 February 1, 1984 available through the trunk extension from Wescott to County Road 30 and from Dvckwood Drive to County Road 30. Please advise if additional information is desired relative to this matter at this time. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert W. Rosene RWR:li • •9138b Page 2. ZO Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Seven REVIEW 8 UPDATE/COMPREHENSIVE MASTER STORM SEWER PLAN D. Authorize Review and Update of Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan -- In the past, the City has tried to maintain a schedule of updating all our comprehensive utility plans on a five-year interval to help in the review of proposed future developments. In the past, comprehensive storm sewer maser plans were prepared in 1967, 1972, with the most recent being completed in 1978. The Putlic Works Director delaved consideration for updating the most recent comprehensive storm sewer plan until 1984 to insure that it would incorporate all the design considerations that have been taken into account during the progression of I -35E through the City. With this review and design coordination with MnDot being completed, it is now appro- priate to have our Master Storm Sewer Plan updated to take into consideration the latest regulations of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and to incorporate the recommendations of the Water Quality Analysis studies that have been performed by the USGS during the past four years. It is also beneficial to have this plan updated to incorporate all the recent development improvements that have occurred during the last 5-6 years. With the rapid growth that the City of Eagan has been experiencing • in the past, it is essential that our Master Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan be kept as up-to-date as possible. In addition, the 1982 Legislature mandated a surface water management program (Chapter 509) which the City of Eagan will be required to comply with. Part of this requirement is a comprehensive storm water management plan for the Gun Club Lake watershed district. • Subsequently, the timing is appropriate to have this plan updated in the near future. I have reviewed the time table and cost estimates with our consulting engineer, Mr. Bob Rosene. It is estimated that this report can be completed by mid -summer 1984 at a cost of approximately $16-18,000 which would be the responsibility of the trunk storm sewer fund. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Authorize a review and update of the current Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan to be performed by the consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. 21 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Eight PETITION/FEASIBILITY REPORT/WESTBURY ADDITION E. Project 396, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Westbury 1st Addition) -- Enclosed on page 1.3 is a petition that we received from the developer of tFestbury Addition requesting the preparation of a feasibility report along with the simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specification to install public streets and utilities within the 1st addition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition from Dave Gabbert and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 396 for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Westbury 1st Addition. 2Z • • n L I Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Nine • PROJECT 397/DENMARK AVENUE F. Project 397, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Denmark Avenue - Streets and Utilities) -- Enclosed on page 2s- is a petition received from the Federal Land Company requesting the installation of streets and utilities on Denmark Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Yankee Doodle Road. This collector street extension is required in order for the first phase 'of the Fagan Heich,ts Commercial Par:; PUD =o be developed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 397 for the installation of streets and utilities on Denmark Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Yankee Doodle Road. • • • • • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Ten STREET VACATION/OLD LEXINGTON AVENUES A. Street Vacation - Old Lexington Avenue South of Diffley Road -- On January 17, the City received a petition requesting a vacation of public right-of-way for old Lexington Avenue as it extends south from Diffley Road. Enclosed on page 2 is a graphic description of this proposed easclnent vacation. While this public right-of-way was never officially dedicated nor acquired by the City, it reverted to a public right-of-way designation through a "perscriptive easement" through continuous use by the travelling public over a period of years. Subsequently, it has shown up on County records as being public right-of-way. This public right-of-way is proposed to be vacated to conform with new alignment of a public right-of-way to be dedicated as part of the Kensington Place development. All public notices have been and sent to all potentially of this date, staff has not proposed road easement vacation the City's vacation of this vacate any public or private record. published in the legal newspaper affected private utilities. As received any objections to this It should be noted that through street right-of-way, it does not utility easements that may be of ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of public streets for old Lexington Avenue extended south of Diffley Road. 26 ....... . ....... X, NO -04'00-E IB6104 (MEAS.) 'VESCI P j'l;g ,— JJ 957540 273 V (M R. 35 12,15, N 3152 1 Isa 39 849 (MEAS N -04'32 W 'ON AVE. LEXNG w ouTLor A 9 tr% BLOCK 4 6 ou7tor OUTLOT F OUTLOT 0 11 OUTLor E 4t OUTLOT 4 'U ....... . ....... X, NO -04'00-E IB6104 (MEAS.) 'VESCI TIMBERLINE CIVIC ASSOCIATION 3061 Woodlark Lane Sagan, MN 55121 JAN 10 1984 January 7, 1984 Mr. Tom Hedges, Administrator Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Mr. Hedges: This letter is to respectfully request permission to be included on the City Council agenda on Tuesday, February 7, 1984. The purpose of the request is to allow the Timberline Civic Associa- tion to speak with regard to the noise emanating from the Univac manufacturing plant next door to our properties. I anticipate two or three separate short presentations. Sincerely, : M. Gus in, President 1 M L. LAW OFFICES HAUGEN AND NIxOLAi. P.A. • 1936 MIDW BY PLAZA BUILDING BOI NICOLLET MALL ORRIN M.HAUGEN MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 66402 THOMAS J. NIROLAI (612) 339-7461 DOUGLAS L-TScHIDA January 24, 1984 ,JAMES T. NIKOLAI Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55123 Re: Sperry Corporation's Ordinance Violation Dear Tom: JAN 2 4 i284 To facilitate the City Council's further consideration of Sperry's failure to bring the semiconductor manufacturing plant into compliance with the R do D Zoning classification under which it is suppose to be functioning, 1 am enclosing six sets of the correspondence generated to date in our attempts to obtain relief from the noise and other problems which this new plant has created. I am also enclosing an audio cassette tape which contairif�recordings taken at various times over the past several months of • the noise being emitted from Sperry's ventilating system. The Timberline residents would appreciate it if you would distribute these folders to the mayor and to the council members prior to the public hearing, which 1 believe has been scheduled for February 7, 1984. Also, we would like you to make the tape available to the mayor and council members so that they can hear, and make an informed judgment as to whether this noise is "negligible" as required by the R do D Zoning classification or even at a "low level" as a Sperry official indicated in one piece of correspondence. This is the noise that Sperry is now putting in our bedrooms. We hope you and the City council members will agree that this is an intolerable infringement upon our rights as property owners and that the City will put all of the pressure at its command on Sperry to rectify this problem immediately. TJN/ljr Enclosures • cc: J. Gostin Ver truly yours Tho as . Ni olai 150 Red C r Road Eagan, MN 55121 30 PATENTS TRADE MARKS COPYRIGHTS Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Twelve LIQUOR LICENSE POLICY CHANGE B. Request for Reconsideration of Liquor License Policy Change -- At the last regular City Council meeting the request by Mr. David Perrier, representing Perrier and Associates, Inc., was continued until the February 7, 1984, meeting. The item was continued to allow the two outstanding liquor license holders, Mark and Pam McCrea and Jean Parranto of J.E. Parranto & ?ssoC13t35, to prcvide a letter to the City Council outlining their .intentions for using their off -sale liquor license. Mr. Perrier presented this request before the City Council at the November 15, 1983, City Council meeting; however, there was no consideration given due to lack of justification presented by Mr. Perrier in advance of the meeting. A letter has been submitted by Mr. David Sellergren, representing Mr. Perrier, asking that the City Council reconsider its off -sale liquor license policy by amending the policy to include a fifth license. Mr. Sellergren recently submitted a second letter also in support of Mr. Perrier's request for reconsideration. Copies of both letters are enclosed and are referenced as pages 3 2. through 3 6 The City Administrator has received letters from McCrea and Associates and J.E. Parranto Associates, Inc. stating their intent to use the off -sale liquor license. Copies of those letters are enclosed on pages 7 through • %S_ for City Council review. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a change in the liquore license policy to add a fifth off -sale liquor license within a specified geographic area of the City. 31 Q 'LALRIiI\, 11OFFMJ\V, DALY & I.IVDORE.N, LTD ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER 7900 XER%ES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55.31 TELEPHONE f8121835-3800 TELECOPIER NO.:612: 835-5102 1100 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55.02 TELEPHONE 1612) 338-6610 December 29, 1983 The Honorable Bea Blomquist 4504 Oak Chase Road Eagan, Minnesota 55123 FEDERAL PPAcrICE PARTNERSHIP LARKIN. MCCARTMY, NOEL a TALK SUITE .110 1301 PENNSYLVANIA. N. W. WASHINGTON, OC. 20004 TCLEPHONE 12021)3)-1000 LEAN 1.4PPr P[r[w .. BLI:. JBN 0...I9.Z[W[.I MICH.cL s....oyu[D inBM.D n.MN eo6c Klc. I. N+ucMza •oPw[aT o. NOwun .•.Ica P. c.ACI e..I.C..e+n.n CVwTIN D.N ON .. oywuM T..0 1 n [ TOGO I. •w[Lu.n c.Tn. E.I e..i' JOD[Pn I. O.TI" .NBwLW J..II L K 10.. .. DTI. c J T" ..COiT[w n.[[NH_oOON ALD JANcr L a. M.c oo N N0' L. no LT ew.BL[T M. L[nwM.N B[.T91 .. POTn W [ILL. ON LA w. L y[w PPwILL OM.M . y P[TIC P49.yL B.PLIN11Tr [VDAN R, BywHIB nT [ya.H [. B.w N[[ • DARK 0..O1 n6ow LMLa K. GTE., NAOMI P. WI64.MSON OF COVNt[L 1111P. 0.1.3 [BION[ Dear Mayor Blomquist: We represent Perrier & Associates, Inc. In November 1983, David Perrier asked that the Council consider a revision to City Code Section 5.52, Subd. 12 which sets a limit of four off -sale liquor licenses in Eagan. Mr.Perrier asked that the Council consider the issuance of a fifth license for the central -eastern section of Eagan. I write this letter to set forth in writing facts and reasons which support a reconsideration of Mr. Perrier's request. Mr. Perrier wishes the policy to be revised so that he may conduct an off -sale liquor business at the Hilltop Plaza Shopping Center. The City Code now authorizes and the Council has approved four off -sale liquor licenses. Two are active; two are inactive. The fourth license was authorized in January 1981 when the third license was inactive. The third license was authorized by policy change in 1976. The 1980 census established Eagan's population at 20,700 people. City staff estimates Eagan's population today at 28,865, a 408 increase since the authorization of the last off -sale license. The 1983 city map, attached, indicates the location of the currently licensed premises. None of the four licenses are in the proximity of Hilltop Plaza, which is three miles from Cedar Liquor, two miles from Yankee Square Shopping Center, three miles from Silverbell Shopping Center and two miles from the unconstructed Safari Trail Center. This • 3k e.Mce w K.IM ..L .o.rnAN uCK c. 1. a. C1. .MBwLW W. eAMlc LaoN w[n OtLL w 0n acR.LO n. •R.coCOCL uL wOD[wl e. WwIiLOCn n L. uVLL1e AM - wOD[wrJ n[n N CDD[v R.N.,0 e, r.[TCnw •u[D C ERI C.SON COW.w01 BRI SCOLL W[a s1L[. JOuN• CnVOM Be.. n /ULL[w JOSEF. W rn0w. O.V-0 C. D[LL[PBR[M JOnn O. I.LL..[w ...... C. BB.LE O..6NL[w .-C....... o..MBw6cu %OCR in. wODPL. T. momrA--001 C n.w LTO t. nBB ELL L cn wla row..ew J. OI[iz[N BI rr[ I.0 w. Dui[wn[N .YCP e.DOLOMBM •u[D N, O. .r.C..[R 11.0. ..C.00iT UND• 8 .I] TN1.08"rM.N Di[VCN O..LC1L[v.H 'LALRIiI\, 11OFFMJ\V, DALY & I.IVDORE.N, LTD ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER 7900 XER%ES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55.31 TELEPHONE f8121835-3800 TELECOPIER NO.:612: 835-5102 1100 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55.02 TELEPHONE 1612) 338-6610 December 29, 1983 The Honorable Bea Blomquist 4504 Oak Chase Road Eagan, Minnesota 55123 FEDERAL PPAcrICE PARTNERSHIP LARKIN. MCCARTMY, NOEL a TALK SUITE .110 1301 PENNSYLVANIA. N. W. WASHINGTON, OC. 20004 TCLEPHONE 12021)3)-1000 LEAN 1.4PPr P[r[w .. BLI:. JBN 0...I9.Z[W[.I MICH.cL s....oyu[D inBM.D n.MN eo6c Klc. I. N+ucMza •oPw[aT o. NOwun .•.Ica P. c.ACI e..I.C..e+n.n CVwTIN D.N ON .. oywuM T..0 1 n [ TOGO I. •w[Lu.n c.Tn. E.I e..i' JOD[Pn I. O.TI" .NBwLW J..II L K 10.. .. DTI. c J T" ..COiT[w n.[[NH_oOON ALD JANcr L a. M.c oo N N0' L. no LT ew.BL[T M. L[nwM.N B[.T91 .. POTn W [ILL. ON LA w. L y[w PPwILL OM.M . y P[TIC P49.yL B.PLIN11Tr [VDAN R, BywHIB nT [ya.H [. B.w N[[ • DARK 0..O1 n6ow LMLa K. GTE., NAOMI P. WI64.MSON OF COVNt[L 1111P. 0.1.3 [BION[ Dear Mayor Blomquist: We represent Perrier & Associates, Inc. In November 1983, David Perrier asked that the Council consider a revision to City Code Section 5.52, Subd. 12 which sets a limit of four off -sale liquor licenses in Eagan. Mr.Perrier asked that the Council consider the issuance of a fifth license for the central -eastern section of Eagan. I write this letter to set forth in writing facts and reasons which support a reconsideration of Mr. Perrier's request. Mr. Perrier wishes the policy to be revised so that he may conduct an off -sale liquor business at the Hilltop Plaza Shopping Center. The City Code now authorizes and the Council has approved four off -sale liquor licenses. Two are active; two are inactive. The fourth license was authorized in January 1981 when the third license was inactive. The third license was authorized by policy change in 1976. The 1980 census established Eagan's population at 20,700 people. City staff estimates Eagan's population today at 28,865, a 408 increase since the authorization of the last off -sale license. The 1983 city map, attached, indicates the location of the currently licensed premises. None of the four licenses are in the proximity of Hilltop Plaza, which is three miles from Cedar Liquor, two miles from Yankee Square Shopping Center, three miles from Silverbell Shopping Center and two miles from the unconstructed Safari Trail Center. This • 3k LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LTNDGREN, L'r D. The Honorable Bea Blomquist • December 29, 1983 Page 3 four issued licenses are on the west side of I -35E. The fourth license (on the east side) remains inactive. Even if the fourth license becomes an active license, there is obviously a sufficient number of Eagan residents on the east side of I -35E to support a second off -sale liquor store. The Eagan Land Use Plan clearly depicts the Pilot Knob - Diffley Road intersection as a service center for the major concentration of citizens living nearby. In conclusion, Mr. Perrier's request implements a number of goals and policies expressed in the Comprehensive Plan. Furthermore, a fifth license responds to the significant growth which has occurred in Eagan since 1980, particularly the number of citizens living east of I -35E'. The location of the store is exactly where it is most convenient to both residents and employees working in Eagan. We ask that the Council revise its Code to issue the license. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Sincerely yours, • i�✓��C/Ld� David C. Sellergren, or LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd. ch cc: Tom Hedges, City Manager • 34 RATIO.OF RESIDENTS PER LICENSE S�LIY N OF LICENSES POPULATION LICENSES PER PERSONS BURNSVILLE 1 31,580 1/5.369 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 1 17,810 1/2,544 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1 7,300 1/1,825 •• EAGAN' 4 28,000 1/1,000 W (OR 1/14,000 BEING USED) T EVEN WITH THE " LRANK ARGEST NUMB BEINGIUSEDER OF ERSTry�,eE6OF A1FTH LICENSEEATE15�,60U, GANw-U LD ANDSIFLCOUNTINGSONLYITHE ICENTHE 0 JAMES P. ".ERIN .00CFIT L. MOIIMA. ,A'. r DALY •O. NCMMLTN LINDGREN ANO.[. w. OAMI[LOON W[NOCLL P.A.....ON OCRALD M FRICDKL POO I., R WXIT LOCA ALUM [. MULLIGAN MOOS NY J. M C MN[SSC• RONALD P. ILCTCM[P JAM[e C. [MICR pON LOWA00 J. DRIBCOLL JAMEO w MIL.Y JOHN A ..UOM O[Nt M. /., L.. JO[CPM W ANTHONY DAVID C SELL.... C. JOHN O. FULLMER w....F C. BOYLE RICHARD A. IORSCML[w .....F L T. A. ONTAG CHARLES O. M GO [LL CHRISTOPHER J. DI[ T3 [N .1..A.I. DIAMOND JOHN M. p ArTIZ ON S. SOLOMON J... C. O JAM[6M6T.OTNEM LMpD. FICIC.00T LINDA FISHER THOMAS P. 5TOL Ary SICVC. O. LEVIN January 31, 1984 L.ARHIN, H0FF.N1,,N, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431 TELEPHONE 16121 63S-3900 TELECOPIER Na 16121 635-5102 1700 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 58402 TELEPHONE 16121338-6610 City of Eagan Attn: Tom Hedges, City 3830 Pilot Knob -Road Eagan; Minnesota 55122 Administrator 1 We: Perrier Liquor License; Our File No."12,246-00 Dear Mr. Hedges:, _ FEOEPAL PRACTICE PARTNERSHIP "FIRM, MCCARTMY, NOEL. /ALE 6 M I NSHALL SUITE 1110 1301 PENNSYLVANIA, N. W. WASHINGTON, O. C. 20004 TELEPHONE 12021737-1000 FEB % ;;04 w[TCw.R. D[CM JON 9, L , MA Cwe I THOMAS MAS e. .O VLILO THOMAS J- FLY.. wO...ST CL.. JAMESeT 0 NO. JAMES MICHA E..1.N M ICNALL URTIN MAN DANT L. JCR ON A..OUINUIMKAM" C TODD L rw[[N, CATH. C oowu. ANDREW J. MITCHELL DAVID O. MOCLUCR JOHN A .I.. M M OATES THOMAS 0. K00. A LD JANETL. HOLT DEADLY M. LK..... BEATRICE A. OTHWCI LCD SHERRIPAUL DLL OMANUNKE [U wCTICX PAUL O_.G.R..G TT SUSAN VOAM R. BARNES OVOAM C. GRN[9 Y DAME OOW ALAN I. NANCY w. er[wn nwoMl N. WILLIAMSON OI COU.BCL JOS[PN OTTIS LIN. J. FIRESTONE Enclosed please find-the-.results.of a telephone survey undertaken by our client, Perrier.and.Associates, with respect to the number of off -sale licenses'in various_,municioalities,in the Twin Cities area. We provide this.as'background:informaeion for the Council's discussion scheduled for February 7, 1984. Please note that of these 23 municipalities with private off -sale licenses, only three exhibit a ratio of population to license higher than that which would exist in Eagan upon the issuance of a fifth license. Moreover, those three communities show a ratio substantially the same as that which would exist in Eagan. I ask that this letter and the attachment be included in the agenda materials for Council review prior to the February 7th meeting. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Sinc ly, x •Dav d C. Selle gren, f LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY INDGREN, Ltd. Sig Enclosure cc: David Perrier 35 SURVEY RESULTS: OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES SELECTED TWIN CITIES' MUNICIPALITIES II. Minneapolis Area A. Private January, 1984 • I. St. Paul Area 24 80,000 1/3,333 Brooklyn Park 11 of Licenses Population Licenses/Population A. Private 6 8,500 1/1,416 Bay Port 5, 2,932 1/ 586 Hastings 8 2,830 l/ 353 Inver Grove Heights 4 18,000 1/4,500 Mounds View 3 12,539 1/4,197 St. Paul Park ;2 5,000 1/2,500 White Bear Lake 5' 23,000 1/4,600 Woodbury 2 11,800 1/5,900 So. St. Paul 5 21,235 1/4,247 "•West'St. Paul 8 18,200 1/2,275 B. Municipal 4 6,500 1/1,625 Apple Valley 10 15,000 1/1,500 New Brighton II. Minneapolis Area A. Private Bloomington 24 80,000 1/3,333 Brooklyn Park 9 40,000 1/4,444 Chaska 6 8,500 1/1,416 Burnsville 7 35,000 1/5,000 Crystal 12 25,500 1/2,083 Golden Valley 6 22,775 1/3,795 • Minnetonka 10 40,000 1/4,000 New Hope 3 18,000 1/6,000 Plymouth 6 35,000 1/5,833 Prior Lake 4 8,000 1/2,000 Shakopee 8 10,700 1/1;337 St. Louis Park 10 42,000 1/4,200 Chanhassen 4 6,500 1/1,625 Hopkins 10 15,000 1/1,500 B. Municipal Anoka Blaine Brooklyn Center Coon Rapids Eden Prairie Farmington Fridley Lakeville Mounds View St. Anthony Robbinsdale Savage Wayzata III. Eagan is Presently 4 29.000 1/7,250 With Proposed License 5 29,000 1/5,800 Perrier and Associates, Inc. 1951 Timberwolf Trail -5(0 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 McCrea & Associates 4330 SEQUOIA DRIVE • • January 19, 1984 Tom Hedges - City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota '55121 Dear Mr. Hedges: EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 • (612) 454-7427 Per your request the following letter addresses the current status of our plans to establish an offsale liquor store. The developers of the propose& Safari Mall have advised us that they are currently in the process of finalizing their construction plans. If constructions plans for the site are implemented and completed as reportedly scheduled, construction will commense in early spring of this year. Our plans coincide directly with the proposed Malls construction with a operational, date of late summer, early fall. The proposed Safari Mall development has apparently been delayed for the past several months because of a variety of economic factors. Our offsale liquor store plans are contingent on the development of the Safari Mall site and, of course, we have no control over the parties responsible for developing this site. • If additional information regarding our plans is needed, please feel free to contact us. Sinc y der! ovokez Mark 8 Pam McCrea • 37 A Minority Owned Consulting Firm JAN -0 6 1' J.E. • AAsranto sociates inc • • Commercial and Industrial Realtors Appraisals Real Estate Development January 26, 1984 Mr. Tom Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: In response to your inquiry this is to advise that I am planning to activate my off -sale liquor license during the current year 1984. This license has been issued for the general Cedarvale area. The same general location will be utilized. It is our feeling that the Cedarvale area is in need of additional retail activity to strengthen its market base. The addition of a new liquor store will help strengthen the area. We are in the process of selecting the appropriate location for a new facility. Currently the store is to be located next to the Mr. Donut at Silver Bell Road. This may or may not be the best location. However, the site will be in the Cedarvale area. When we have completed our planning, we will make the appropriate applications to the City Staff. I hope this information is sufficient for your needs. If not, please feel free to call. ocrlmaw 3S 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway 0 Eagan, Minnesota 0 55122 0 (612) 454.1800 • l J • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Thirteen OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION/PERRIER 8 ASSOCIATES INC. C. Off -Sale Liquor License Application, Perrier and Associates, Inc. for Hilltop Plaza -- This item also appeared on the November 15, 1983, and January 17, 1984, City Council agendas. In order for the City Council to take any action on this item, it would be necessary that the off -sale liquor license policy be amended to include a fifth geographic location. Enclosed without page number is a copy of the Perrier and Associates, Inc. off -sale liquor license application for Hilltop Plaza. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the off -sale liquor license application submitted by Perrier and Associates, Inc. only if a change in the off -sale liquor license policy is adopted. 39 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Fourteen • HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 A. Michael Construction, Inc., Michael N. Monson, for a Preliminary Plat, Hillandale Addition No. 2, Consisting of Approximately 12.58 Acres and Containing Approximately 125 Dwelling Units -- A public hearing was held before the advisory Planning Commission at the November 22, December 15, 1983, meetings and January 24, 1984, meeting to consider an application submitted by Michael Construction Inc. for a preliminary plat consisting of approximately 12.58 acres and containing approximately 125 dwelling units referenced as Hillandale Addition N0.2. The Advisory Planning Commission has taken considerable time at Planning Commission meetings to discuss this application and their recommendation to the City Council is to approve the preliminary plat. For information on this item refer to the consulting planner's report, copies enclosed on pagesAr(_through 5s . For additional informa- tion that was prepared by the City Planner, refer to pages 5-4 through6 For information submitted by the Director of Public Work refer to page For copies of correspondence regarding the agenda item; re er to pagesr0_3 through :Z2 - For a copy of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission recom- • mendation- concerning parkland dedication, refer to page -7S . For a copy of the minutes of the Advisory Planning Commission meeting, refer to page (s) 74 —7 Z. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Hillandale Addition No. 2. • E 0 -- CITY OF EAGAN -- SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat - Hillandale Addition #2 APPLICANT: Parts of Lot 2 Block 1, Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 Lot 2 Block 2, and Outlot A - Hillandale #1 LOCATION: East of Blackhawk Road - 1/4 mile north of Diffley Road EXISTING -ZONING: R-4 (Multiple' Residential) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: November 22, 1983 DATE OF REPORT: November 16, 1983 REPORTED B1": John S. Voss, Planning Consultant APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting preliminary plat approval for Hillan a e Addition 12 consisting of approximately 12.58 acres and con- taining approximately 125 dwelling units. This is a re -plat of a portion of the pre- viously platted Hillandale Addition #1. This property is located east of Blackhawk Road, just north of the intersection with Diffley Road. • ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently the parcel is zoned R-4 (Multiple Residential)_ This property has been zoned to this category for several years. However only a:portion :y,:,.. of the First Addition was developed with condominiums/townhouses.. The -remainder was: not developed until the right-of-way for Interstate = 35E, which passes along the southeast portion of the property, was established- In the recent taking of right- of-way for I -35E, a portion of the First Addition plat was acquired along the entire boundary with I -35E as illustrated on the attached exhibits. This property was designated for R -III development in the 1980 Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan. Therefore, the zoning and proposed development are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which proposes a density range of six to 12 units per acre. The actual proposed=.density-.is a net density of 9.75 units per acre. PLANNER'S COMMENTS: 1) Ori inal'Preliminar Plat: The original preliminary plat submitted for this area - Hillandale A dition #1 - provided for the existing Meadowlark Road to •.-continue to the east for an additional distance of about 400 feet where it would end in a cul-de-sac. It also proposed a loop street extending south. from Meadowlark Road and continuing back to the west to Blackhawk Road- It appears that this original plan is no longer -feasible because the Minnesota. Department of Transportation has taken additional right-of-way all .along the southeast edge of this property for I -35E. --This taking of right-of-way was considerably more than that which was anticipated when this property was -.•.= originally planned. Therefore the property owner is proposing, under the • Hillandale 02 preliminary plat, to provide a cul-de-sac at the end -of Meadow- lark Road as it now exists. All other accesses to the proposed apartment 41 Preliminary Plat - Hillandale Addition H2 Page 2 development would be provided by private streets maintained by a homeowner's • association. 2) Lot and Block Plan: It is proposed under the preliminary plat that this. property a ivi a into four lots. If the units are to be sold to indi- viduals rather than developed as rental property the preliminary plat should show a lot and block plan for the individual units. If the property is to be developed into four phases as rental property, there should be a guarantee that the internal street system will be developed and maintained so that -pro- posed Lot 3, which is otherwise landlocked; will be provided -with proper access.. 3) Setback Variances: The proposed site plan submitted with the preliminary plat appears to meet all the minimum requirements provided by the Eagan Zoning Code with the exception of buildings and parking spaces bordering I -35E. Along this common boundary, several buildings are shown bordering the right-of-way line wherein a minimum 50 foot setback is required. Also, a minimum 20 foot setback is required for parking and some of the proposed parking stalls are actually proposed to be located on Mn Dot property. This can only be accomplished if there is an agreement with Mn Dot and a variance is granted..by the City. 4) Homeowner's Association: The proposed Articles of Incorporation for a.Home- owner s ssociation ave been7.submltted by the petitioner. This -needs to be reviewed by the City's attorney to insure that the private streets can be • properly maintained and that all dwelling units will be guaranteed proper access to a -public street. 5) Conditions of Approval: If this preliminary plat is approved it should be su ,lett to tie following conditions as well as those proposed by the City Engineer; A. A building setback variance will have to be approved by the City along the I -35E boundaries in order to permit structures at a zero lot setback where a minimum of 50 feet is required. Also, a variance will have to be approved, as well -as an agreement obtained from Mn Dot, to permit parking as proposed over the I -35E boundary where a minimum of 20 feet is required by City Code. B. A -private street loop should be provided on proposed Lot 1 rather than a long, dead-end private street. C. Concrete curbs shall be provided along the perimeter -of all driving surfaces. D. If individual units are to be sold, the developer sha1T provide a re- vised.lot and block plan. In any instance, the developer shall provide a phasing plan. E. The City attorney shall review the proposed Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowner's Association to insure that proper access to a public street will'be guaranteed for all properties and that the Association will maintain the private streets. 4Z- Preliminary Plat - Hillandale Addition 112 Page 3 F. If the petitioner is requesting a model home and sales office ® this shall be so designated as a part of the approval by the City with any appropriate conditions related thereto. G. Park dedication shall be satisfied in a manner determined by the City Council after review by the Eagan Park Committee. H. A landscape plan shall be submitted for review by the City staff and approval by the City Council with the approval of the final plat. The landscape plan, through vegetative screens and berming, shall provide additional noise atten- uation related to I -35E where necessary and practical. ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS I. If installed privately, plans and specifications for utility and street construction shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted to the Engineering Department for approval. J. The private drives in Meadowlark Road should form a "T" intersection. K. The existing right-of-way must be vacated prior to final plat approval. L. Easements shall'be dedicated as required. ® M. This proposed development shall be responsible for trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. N. All costs associated with installing public improve- ments and private streets shall be the sole responsi- bility of this proposed development. O. Private streets shall be 28' wide and have concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing. P. No dead-end lateral water mains will be allowed. 45 MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLAN- NER FROM: RICHARD M. HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 1983 SUBJECT: HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT The Engineering Division of the Department of Public Works has the following comments regarding this proposed development to be consid- ered by the Advisory Planning Comrr,ission and City Council: DRAINAGE/TOPOGRAPHY This proposed development has been previously platted as Hillandale Addition which is located in the.southeast quarter of Section 20. The existing terrain is rolling and covered with groupings of hardwood trees scattered throughout the area. The nature of the rolling top- ography results in several hills and depressions. Consequently, slopes over this area range from 2% to greater than 108. This proposed devel- opment is located within Drainage District A-21 as illustrated in Fi- gure 1. Drainage from this area is directed by storm sewer to the northwest and to Pond AP -2 which has a positive gravity outlet control- ling its elevation. The proposed grading for this development will consist primarily of • filling in the low spots by leveling some of the hills. The proposed grading will not alter the direction of'the existing drainage. In- stead, the drainage will be directed towards the internal private streets and from there into an underground storm sewer system which eventually connects to the City's existing system within Meadowlark Road. Subsequently, no trunk storm sewer will be required to be con- structed to service this proposed development. UTILITIES Utilities of sufficient size, capacity and depth exist within the vi- cinity of this proposed development to provide service to it. Figure 2 illustrates the 8" sanitary sewer layout already in place along with the B" water main located along the north edge of Meadowlark Lane and a 15" storm sewer located within the south portion of Meadowlark Lane. It is proposed to extend the sanitary sewer, water main and storm sew- er as necessary to provide service to this proposed development. These utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City standards and reviewed by the Engineering Department for compli- ance. STREETS Access to this proposed developrmnt is currently off of Meadowlark Road, a City street built to its ultimate cross section being 39' wide • with concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing. no ENGINEERING REPORT •HILLANDALE ADDITION NO NOVEMBER 17, 1983 PAGE TWO 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT This development is proposing to utilize private streets throughout. Consequently, the private streets shall be 28' wide and have concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing. Driveways into the cluster of units shall1be a minimum of 20' wide and have concrete curbing and bituminous surfacing. Furthermore, staff recommends deleting the proposed cul-de-sac at the end of Meadowlark Road. Instead, the private drives and Meadowlark Road should form a "T" intersection. Staff recommends this for the reason that the "T" intersection will provide better channelization of traffic rather than the proposed intersection of the private drives on.the cul-de-sac circle. The proposed plivate drive to the northeast corner of this proposed development exceeds the length for a dead-end street as outlined in the City Code. The distance is approximately 650' to the westernmost townhouse in this area and approximately the same distance for the easternmost townhouse in this area. Subsequently, this raises an issue for emergency vehicles which should probably be addressed by the Fire Chief or Fire Marshal. 1 • RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS All right-of-way for this proposed development has previously.been dedicated as a part of Hillandale Addition No. 1 as shown by Figure 3. Subsequently, all publicly -dedicated right-of-way and easements located withinithis proposed development will have to be vacated prior to final plat approval. Utility easements of sufficient width will be required to be dedicated over all proposed utilities as a condition of final plat approval. In addition, 10' drainage and utility easements shall be centered over all interior lot lines with a 5' drainage and utility easement being dedicated adjacent to all exterior lot lines. ASSESSMENTS This proposed development is responsible for trunk area storm sewer assessments over Lots 2-4, Block 2 of the Hillandale Addition No. 1 at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. Currently, this would amount to $22,455.00 (416,611 square feet at $0.0539 per square foot). All costs associated with installing public.improvements and private streets will be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report in detail • with the Advisi ry Planning Commission at their meeting of November 22, 1983. Res=cfu/l�lJ , Richard M. Hefti, P.E., Assistant Engineer 4s RMH/jach / w/• . nn r\ L) err. •' r 77 ACI�9 �•.,- — . "F --'-tea -,—A_70--��/ • — h9"," 1�IL r.�b 6- �� B .;.. �. , --�. OLACKHG'uM A-IS 111t.J'{:J PARK ' _ p I w3 A 57 IIlC �: i woaoHav v �• a. A J r y II I 1 '- \ If''r • lE vi j I RJr Pau. �`-7 W r H h -34i�u A.- J %, /%q1 `II �J 6 _ ' B A-5B--E24 i '-/ J B-6 • `' B-37N' �� 36 11i �� - �•. �1 .� - - 6. ,/ A-31 .43 .' � =[r7� �,d j __ (�`}'I�- �—• L A-32 -/ w r nr rn u-Crr 'w "r A 27\ A-33!' i�`A-34 gy27; ,a \• v6r -..,j�y 'i, -64 �A-37I SEN A-65 /B-2i I-S " • ti= — "" '/n��•i1�;' —-�� -B-32 Q A-66,� 1 p�7'6�7' FES A-51 1L Ji14 A7\;`` ❑❑'cENI ice 1 = oL-60/� L'59 1 11 rIr-• / -52 i r.' B-33 A B �\ r, A-69 n.. �i.�]-- ; \� A-40 ..._ x.'61 SL 1 L- -07�A-44\ OAKOTAI COu`f k<PARA 1 •�SialESa AX 'NTV L 64 A 46 ` A-48 `' A-49/x- r.� -��1, r •,(� I��l- V 1 L-55 APPLE VALLEY ���� I LT,53 ` i L-57 FIG. LEGEND PONDING AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . \ , STORM SEWERS (f•ifllN) . . . . . . . . STORM SEWERS IProrouA) . . . . . . . . - - --- - - TN STORM SEW E STORY LIFT STATION t4,,1114)• � VV .� -� r/�°�,r� 1 1 �' 22� �y ' \�;� • y�-.—.,z,. {..•- •366 X160 a.. i TRAIL e• NI n I • 1 - V L1. . ART, �\,' \ I I :67 1 S¢.Ll. „� 76. I AVE OT l 1 GAUrano ! I Tal 11 I 2 I - • T. F 163 1 I UFERVJ000, i \ -I - I 1 raa1L/Co.. fSTOIVC � 3— n' 99 I IA I 0 -- n MEADOW s•._ L A K _LANE CARNELIAN i ACJ `•,. ' '�q PARR / �Z�r a' _ I-- -�Subject I KYLARK f -THRY CIRCO 4 Oy •r CO RD 70 DRIVE Parcel DIFFLEY 1 RD_ I FIG. 2 • N o loo ir- --- umnw• �omt muu� A m°e uc EAGAN MINNESOTA SAN SEWER -• - _ WATER VAIN LOCA710N PLAN 4.47 r �. E. 1/4 SEC, 20, T 27, R 23 ..n�� w��'fl' ' � •_• • a o� O`O-7d • �. • F�� WAS. 1 Y O'JJ ' •�•.. �` TRAIL •--,�1, - - TACONITE ~�• i-4 it • y . .. I ' • - -� /•fir. if a EF a:•Y a• "•, ei r. r v.: �? -WIVE 4T' OSf • .tl., • wt a"+.._ ,—+arae• _� :- CARNELIAN City of , n Eagan 010-77 .'... PARK 1 020-77 _ 5 , 020-73 KRMARO N. LARSON o..ouou. curl• 51 o0% Vn r., rua• I: DEERWOOD ORIVE Pc �5• Rodtet, TRAIL 067-73 066-7 i rte, ,'�' 010•_76 • ' 020-76 r Ma•WM M,C 1 I/W to b ` vacated IEA OWLARR •,i ,r. ��•::{: ` // :I 2 HIL'LA LE ADDITION ,a i NO., -r. Al Al� F1 G. 3 :' a ,a u � � +. 'r •,� � �. • M 1} •i. 1. � � V 1 . _ 06 070 -7s - DRIVE *TtF i 1 a I 062-73 a —jp -.t 4WK ---7 a �Wp—DS I ' • ' - SlY•.• 0•t..•• IS n•. Y CM•\. •1. +•• Y\IT19•-•\I .. .. ANE . . ? . • - i::::::+;:?'> pir Z. RNELIAN :::.:.:... . EAO 010-77 CW�ARK >w..• '. PARK / Ld - D • e• P �:1_ '•�.,dl'J .•.. • .. Yom..• �. o ...........:..::::::....... ...................:::::: 9 i.AI. .......... .......... ozo-7e!S,_ A PART Of To 49 wrLar c L _ HILLANDALC ADDITION [1 0. 2 0 E 1bf N I • 6 II t a • !of WIrA. PiEAr�W�i bl I Isi. � x ILI 2 'L I, E -0•r- 3 �•� i 651 �-f lyj 11q, 1tt A ��l- 5'7Liol � �P • for /N/G14AELCONSTI7ClGT/ONXtK RON KRUEGER S. ASSOCIATES, INC. INA Su.VE VIM . "lIlwW . /O llb ilV M" 0W - EM. YAN1.F. uv:v 1. SUY.114 Vila MI.Ti - .• v/� SCY11 _ /OO Nv�SOI T...�. n hll l p-rl NO✓ Q_`_ y�11 j TT T Meadowlark ro - Road 4t \ I_• I r r , 011e Plan \ , 1~ / I 7y= C) �.o 6 _ C_, QON��1 E 0? 10 gox: Site Information iey.tc � ieox, �rx WIiD •I:1 Y'W�uo•cs l t P / It co Ln / wr»'ro trl'N v / V-1 yl � III ,-, j•1 _ '/`I, ' _s� fir— '•i ' PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN TION NP+fmomp P A nOCI ���. 1N - 4 r Y.. a f "" •Ili` a �\ ���� � I; LAD f 1 x. vi /I: \` \` •, %, � ` = y. J :;� i Legend: i — . \ `S �• I'�`' �\ ,`,'° / / \ �e STORM I 1 •_ ,• ' r SANITARY `\'I, r Y J ♦ \ �� .. �'i'__-r. _w____ WATER PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN COM K�BC aRsuon� 7 RB � _ .. _ ; . ...... :•:� :. Ind.; Ind ...._..... e. LB SUBJECT J?ARC R.1 A. .. Ind.:.._.... . ' R -N .. �• ... � - _ _ . J. F � 111 "VVV777"' i F R -II P R II LB R-13 _�. P, _r R -II R,( - �•�� <"•XMill`f.h-. _ . .mss-. R -Ir d-•' r — E ' e' .{ 5. R-11 - � Ind. ��-. �J �y• �- c41_s �' R1/ /.Y CSC,.. '•' P r. RI ' E R.I 1'\b_w Il o_m � Ral .Wr LB FR -III LB • �1- \f+.� �._:� CSC - �R-Fj'.; °`' �'. .,.I ) •- RB LB Gf% R -I P '.Li •ih•° R-1) r -'• 5m SLB R -I L R -I p TA !' v _- R -I R -II P[ R -II G .F R-11 33 R-1' J R -II _ .4i•"r�P d• I: _L ,�,:- — R41� . R -II L . .I — `� —vpO5EM0 APPLE ../VALLEY I r• �� ij 7 Yti-`ilk �� �I F•- ...-:.i•. j: E, .. B _ R -II ':c i"":: lig >'•-.i. i I ` R -IR R -III R-1is.�1: ==i-.�" R-11 CSC/GB -' L.:ry--rLXJ. z. .Wr LB FR -III LB • �1- \f+.� �._:� CSC - �R-Fj'.; °`' �'. .,.I ) •- RB LB Gf% R -I P '.Li •ih•° R-1) r -'• 5m SLB R -I L R -I p TA !' v _- R -I R -II P[ R -II G .F R-11 33 R-1' J R -II _ .4i•"r�P d• I: _L ,�,:- — R41� . R -II L . .I — `� —vpO5EM0 APPLE ../VALLEY I r• �� ij • MEMO TO: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 18, 1984 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON MICHAEL CONSTRUCTION, INC., PRELIMINARY PLAT, HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 This application began the planning process in November, 1983, and the Advisory Planning Commission continued this preliminary plat again at the December 15, 1983 meeting for additional information. At that meeting, the Planning Commission requested that a traffic study be done to determine that the road proposed will handle the additional traffic for the 112 dwelling units. With that, the ap- plicants hired Westwood Planning and Engineering Company to do a traffic analysis of the proposed project. Attached to this memor- andum are the findings of the traffic engineer in regard to this project and its effect on the surrounding road system. In a short analysis, it appears that the proposed road specifications would be more than adequate to handle the additional 112 dwelling units in this proposed project. The issue in regard to the proposed road is whether the road should be a public or private street. In review of this, it appears that • the applicant is requesting that the road be designed to the same specifications as a public street but remain in the homeowner's association for maintenance and upkeep. With the road being a pri- vate road, the setbacks are less than what would be required if the road would be a public street running through this proposed project. That is the main reason the applicant is proposing a private street vs. a public street. If the road were to be a public street, then additional setbacks would have to be met from the right-of-way of the proposed street going through the proposed project. If the private street were allowed, the house or dwelling units could be set back 46' from centerline of the proposed road vs. the public street requiring a minimum setback of 75' from centerline or an ad- ditional 29' of setback. In review of this particular site, the configuration and layout of the site is very narrow, and to make the site work, the applicant is proposing the least amount of setback as possible. As you are aware, they are already proposing to go right to the property line abutting 35E in order to get adequate width to develop the proper- ty. Therefore, the applicant is trying to do everything possible to increase the width by reducing setbacks wherever possible to make the project a feasible development. As you can see from the proposed plan, the development is a lower intensity or lower scale of townhouse -style density where living quarters would be a maxi- mum of 2�-stories in height vs. what could be allowed on the multi- ple site of 3 stories plus. Therefore, the applicant is keeping • the intent of the neighborhood by proposing to construct this one story type of development needing more ground area than if the IS -4 CITY OF EAGAN UPDATE ON HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 • JANUARY 18, 1984 PAGE TWO development were a multiple project of multiple stories. In review of this particular development proposal, the applicant is proposing to construct 112 dwelling units on 12.5 gross acres with a gross density of 8.9 dwelling units per acre. In deducting road right-of-way for either a private street or a public street, the net acres would be between 11.3 and 10.4 net acres. In calculating the net density, it appears that the development would be between 10 and 11 dwelling units per acre which would be at the very low end of the multiple density approved on the site. In review of the lot coverage, the lot coverage differs from gross acre to net with the lot coverage on the gross acre being approximately 18.98 and on the net deducting a public street approximately 218-21.58 which is slightly over the maximum lot coverage allowed. Again, in review- ing this particular plan, it appears that the applicant is propos- ing to construct more of a townhouse/garden apartment -style dwell- ing unit vs. the more standard higher density multiple unit which normally is developed in an R-4 District. In calculating what :the number of units which could be allowed within this development pro- posal on a net basis, the dwelling units could range approximately 165 and calculating 15 dwelling units'an-adre on 11 net acres, or an additional 53 dwelling units which is one half again what is • being proposed in this particular development request. In review of this project, it appears that the trade-off the Com- mission will have to review to allow the lower density would be in granting the setback variance from 35E and setback variances from the internal street if determined a public street is required to allow this lower density. If the Commission decides not to grant any variance, this whole development plan proposed will have to be redesigned and a different type of dwelling unit proposed in order to fit the constraints of this site in regard to setbacks. What this would mean would be the development would go vertical into two to three-story buildings to get the density allowed on the site which has been granted through zoning vs. trying to obtain some type of lower density on a lineal scale or townhouse -style of development. Therefore, in review of this proposal, there are trade-offs in re- gard to the type of development the City wants to have in this par- ticular area, whether it be the lower density as proposed or deny this request and suggest that the applicant meet all zoning and set- back criteria and propose a higher density development proposal. The last item staff would like to mention is in regard to the en- vironmental assessment review. Staff was asked what the require- ments are for an environmental assessment worksheet for this pro- ject. Since the December 15th meeting, staff has been in contact • with the neighborhood to inform them as to what process they would have to go through to initiate the petition to require an environ- mental assessment worksheet review. In this process, it appears S7 CITY OF EAGAN • UPDATE ON HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 JANUARY 18, 1984 41 PAGE THREE that the neighborhood or homeowner's association can petition the Environmental Quality Board to check to see if the proposed project meets any of the mandatory categories requiring an environmental assessment review. The Environmental Quality Board would then con- tact the City of Eagan, and they would determine that Eagan is the regulatory government agency which would be in charge to determine if an environmental assessment worksheet would be needed or not. In the past, the City of Eagan has not required an environmental assessment worksheet if a project did not meet any of the mandatory categories requiring a worksheet to be done. In fact, this is the case with this particular project; the project is small where none of the items proposed in this project would meet the mandatory cat- egories in the regulations for an environmental assessment review. Therefore, in the beginning, City staff did not require the devel- oper to start the process of an environmental assessment worksheet. The City Council does have the right, however, through the discre- tion process, to determine that an environmental assessment work- sheet may or may not be needed even though the project does not meet the mandatory categories. If the Planning Commission elects to approve the site plan and de- velopment proposal submitted at this particular time, the commis- sion should: 1) Accept the variances in regard to setback from 35E rights-of- way. 2) A minimum of a 25' setback be required from the back of the curb up to any dwelling unit or portion of dwelling unit in the development project. 3) A lot coverage variance of approximately 1%-2% would have to be granted for this particular development proposal. 4) A building setback variance will have to be approved by the City along the I -35E boundaries in order to permit structures at a zero lot setback where a minimum of 50 feet is required. Also, a variance will have to be approved, as well as an agreement obtained from MnDOT, to permit parking as proposed over the I -35E boundary where a minimum of 20 feet is requir- ed by City Code. 5) A private street loop should be provided on proposed Lot 1 rather than a long, dead-end private street. 6) Concrete curbs shall be provided along the perimeter of all driving surfaces. • 7) If individual units are to be sold, the developer shall pro- vide a revised lot and block plan. In any instance, the de- veloper shall provide a phasing plan. m CITY OF EAGAN UPDATE ON HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 • JANUARY 18, 1984 PAGE FOUR 8) The City attorney shall review the proposed Articles of In- corporation of the Homeowner's Association to insure that proper access to a public street will be guaranteed for all properties and that the Association will maintain the pri- vate streets. 9) If the petitioner is requesting a model home and sales of- fice, this shall be so designated as a part of the approval by the City with any appropriate conditions related thereto. 10) Park dedication shall be satisfied in a manner determined by the City Council after review by the Eagan Park Committee. 11) A landscape plan shall be submitted for review by the City staff and approval by the City Council with the approval of the final plat. The landscape plan, 'through vegetative screens and berming, shall provide additional noise atten- uation related to I -35E where necessary and practical. ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS 12) If installed privately, plans and specifications for utili- • ty and street construction shall be prepared by a register- ed engineer and submitted to the Engineering Department for approval. 13) The private drives in Meadowlark Road should form a "T" in- . '-tersection. 14) The existing right-of-way must be vacated prior to final plat approval. 15) Easements shall be dedicated as required. 16) This proposed development shall be responsible for trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 17) All costs associated with installing public improvements and private streets shall be the sole responsibility of this de- velopment. 18) Private streets shall be 28' wide and have concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing. 19) No dead-end lateral water mains will be -allowed. 1] W • MEMO TO: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COtiLMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER ` FROM: RICHARD M. HEFTI, ASSISTANT'CITY ENGINEER DATE: JANUARY 18, 1984 SUBJECT: HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT Staff has reviewed the traffic study prepared by Mr. Kenneth W. Ander- son of Westwood Planning and Engineering Company on January 5, 1984 and would like to comment on the recommendations and justify staff's position to maintain this proposed access road as a publicly -dedicated street. First, staff was in general concurrence with all findings and recom- mendations of the above referenced report. The sole exception is that staff believes it would be in the best interests of the City to maintain the proposed access road as a publicly -dedicated street rather than a privately owned street. One advantage to the City in maintaining this access road as a publicly -dedicated street is main- tenance. As a City street, the City would be able to control the maintenance of the street by insuring preventive maintenance, such as sealcoating being performed at proper intervals. Also, if this access road is a City street, then should repairs be required, the • City would be obligated to perform this work when it is necessary. On the other hand, if this was a private drive, the City would have no authority to insure the street is properly maintained, that is to say that proper sealcoating intervals are observed and any street repair performed immediately and not dependent upon the association's budget. In addition, winter maintenance would also pose a problem. with City snowplows having to stop and turn around at the end of Mea- dowlark Road. It would be much more efficient to continue around the proposed access street to Blackhawk Road. Furthermore, because pri- vate snow removing contractors can perform snowplowing operations at a much earlier time than City crews, since their snow removing re- sponsibilities are minuscule compared to that of the City crews, staff is concerned with increased complaints from residents along Meadowlark Lane questioning why the private road was snowplowed be- fore a City street. This area is already a problem area due to its lower priority on the snowplowing list since it is a dead-end street and because internal parking problems with the existing townhouse de- velopment necessitates some residents parking along Meadowlark Road. Finally, dedicating the proposed access road as a City street would improve the continuity of Meadowlark Road by creating a looped street back into Blackhawk Road thereby fulfilling the original concept of a looped public street as platted with the Hillandale Addition No. 1. In another matter regarding this proposed development, it is staff's understanding that adequate setback could be acquired adjacent the • I -35E exit ramp. MnDOT has indicated that upon completion of the berm adjacent this proposed development, they would construct their fence on the top of the berm and turn back the additional right-of-way ENGINEERING REPORT HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 JANUARY 18, 1984 • PAGE TWO from their fence to the existing property line to the developer. This would result in approximately a 60-70 foot buffer area. It is also staff's understanding that the reason MnDOT purchased additional right- of-way from this parcel is that easements could not be negotiated for construction of a berm required between the I -35E ramp and this parcel. Subsequently, staff would recommend the developer pursue obtaining this excess right-of-way from MnDOT as a condition offinalplat ap- proval. Otherwise, if the fence is installed at the current roadway lines, there would not be enough room for emergency vehicles to circle behind the easterly edges of these proposed. townhouses. I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report addendum in detail with the Advisory Planning Commission at their meeting of Jan- uary 24, 1984. Respectfully submitted, ��O'6 Richard M. Hefti, P.E. Assistant City Engineer` ` RMH/jach 61 • • MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR • FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1984 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT CONSIDERATION - HILLANDALE ADDITION $2 At the Planning Commission meeting of January 24, there was considerable discussion pertaining to a publicly dedicated street versus private street built to City standards. The major concern that the Public Works Department has pertains to continuity of thoroughfare patterns. When the Hillandale Addition was originally presented as a preliminary plat, it proposed a thorough- fare plan which had an internal loop street connecting to Blackhawk Road at two locations. This street was to be .a public right- of-way. When the first phase of development occurred, Meadowlark Road was constructed and dedicated as a public street. Due to the fact that it was constructed without the standard cul de sac or an adequate turn around, the City has experienced problems in providing satisfactory snow removal services on Meadowlark Road. Subsequently, the Engineering Division recommended that this future road connection through the second addition be a publicly dedicated street which would facilitate snow removal operations. . To have this looped street segmented into a portion under private jurisdiction with Meadowlark Road remaining under public jurisdic- tion would not solve the current problems and could possibly create future problems due to the ability of the private or City crews providing snow removal prior to the other. In addition, we are starting to receive some complaints from homeowners and their associations who feel that they are not getting an equal amount of City service for comparable taxes paid. In addition, certain associations are requesting that private streets be turned back to the City for perpetual maintenance due to their inability to effectively control their street maintenance with their limited funds and resources. Taking these problems into consideration, I would like to strongly encourage the City Council to try and maintain continuity in the development of this area through either requiring the continuation of a publicly dedicated looped street or, as an alternative allow the private street installation with the condition that the existing right-of-way from Meadowlark Road be vacated and all maintenance responsibility revert to the homeowner association. An additional concern that should be considered relates to the lack of traffic enforcement that can be performed by the police department on private dedicated streets. This could possibly be a detriment in this particular situation where this private street will act as a looped thoroughfare via an extension of Meadowlark Road to Blackhawk Road. C7� Director of Public Works 63L TAC/kf 0 • WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY January 5, 1984 Mr. Michael N. Monson Michael Construction 14560 Martin Dryve Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Lakewood Townhomes of Eagan Dear Mr. Monson: At your request, we have evaluated the Lakewood townhouse development to determine projected traffic movements generated by the proposed new housing units and to evaluate the proposed road system in relationship to this traffic. On llednesday, January 4, 1984, I met with Rich Hesti, Assistant City Engineer, and discussed the city's standards for road construction. Mr. Hesti stated that a 32 foot wide city street using a MnDOT Standard -B-412 curb and gutter section (as shown on the attached sketch) will meet the city's standards. This design will accommodate two-way traffic and will provide sufficient width to pass a stalled vehicle. If the'homeowner's association would ever default on street maintenance, this design is compatible with other streets and could be maintained by city forces. Mr. Hesti suggested that 35 foot radius returns be used at intersections, as shown on the attached sketches. We recommend that Meadowlark Road be connected with the private road serving Lakewood Townhomes. This will facilitate circulation movement for garbage collection, police surveillance, and other municipal service functions, as well as providing optional access points in case of street blockages or other unusual events. The attached sketch shows a design which will encourage residents from Lakewood Townhomes to remain on the development street rather than turning to Meadowlark Road for access to Blackhawk Road. ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION Meadowlark Road presently serves 100 townhomes units and the proposes' Lake- wood development will add an additional 112 units. Thirty-nine of Lakewood's units will be located east of the Meadowlark Road intersection with the remaining 73 units located to the south. Based on trip generation factors from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, MnDOT, and from studies by llestwood Planning & Engineering, we anticipate 790 daily trips from the existing development, plus 885 trips from Lakewood townhomes. The following hourly trip distributions are anticipated during the morning and evening rush hours: 7115 WAYZATA BOULEVARD• MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55120 161b 5460155 �� Mr. Michael N. Ronson January 5, 1984 Page 2 Inbound Traffic Outbound Traffic Morning rush hour 96 100 Evening rush hour 108 78 Anticipated distribution of these trips between the Meadowlark Road inter- section and the.Lakewood Townhomes intersection is shown on the attached Traffic Flow Plan. Distribution of trips is based on the following para- meters: • 90% of the traffic entering or leaving this development area will be oriented to or from the south on Blackhawk Road • All traffic from the existing development will utilize Meadowlark Road to reach Blackhawk Road • All traffic from the 39 proposed new units north of Meadowlark Road, with destinations or origins north of this area, will use Meadowlark Road to reach Blackhawk Road (31 vehicles per day) • • 600 of the trips from these 39 units, with origins or destinations south of the site, will'use Meadowlark Road to reach Blackhawk Road (166 vehicles per day) 0 • All trips from the 73 proposed dwelling units south of the Meadowlark Road intersection will utilize the new road to reach Blackhawk Road The above assumptions are based on travel time, relative distances and anti- cipated origin/destination movements involving use of I -35E and other major traffic arteries. No distribution factor was assumed to compare the new road with Meadowlark Road based on driver friction. Driver friction could be caused by delays at intersections with Blackhawk Road, vehicle parking or snow removal policies which would restrict either Meadowlark Road or the new road because of limited width or sight distance, and a general per- ception by the vehicle operator of safety and convenience. If congestion were to occur on either of these roads, some shift of volumes from one intersection to another might be encountered. The attached Traffic Flow Plan shows anticipated traffic movements during peak hours. Peak activity will occur during the morning rush hour and the heaviest flow of traffic during the morning peak will be the left turn from Meadowlark Road to Blackhavk Road, with 52 vehicles per hour. Traffic from the new development will contribute approximately 10 of these 52 vehicles with the remaining 42 vehicles generated from existing development. During the evening rush hour, a right turn movement from Blackhawk Road to Meadowlark Road is anticipated to carry 58 vehicles per hour, with 11 vehi- cles continuing through to the new tovnhomes and 47 vehicles attracted to • existing development. 6* Mr. Michael N. Monson • January 5, 1984 Page 3 M Based on these assumed traffic movements, the city should experience no measurable delay or congestion because of traffic flow from these resi- dential developments. The physical layout of Lakewood Townhomes and the presence of I -35E right-of-way will restrict further development. There- fore, we do not anticipate any additional traffic generation or other factors which would require provision of higher level streets. The city's standard, 32 foot wide streets should comfortably accommodate traffic movements from these developments. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the above factors, we recommend the following measures: • The Lakewood Townhomes access road be constructed as a privately owned municipal street, constructed to a 32 foot width, meeting City of Eagan design standards. • Meadowlark Road should be connected, as shown on the sketch, to allow traffic from the existing townhouses access and circulation through the site. • On the basis of this -design, the street should function in a manner • similar to other residential streets, with no unusual safety hazards, maintenance problems, or anticipated traffic congestion. • The intersection of this road with Blackhawk Road and the intersec- tion of Meadowlark Road with Blackhawk Road should function with virtually no congestion or delay during peak periods. The existing alignment and design of Blackhawk Road should accommodate these traffic volumes without restricting safety or capacity. • Design of the proposed new road intersection with Meadowlark Road will encourage.traffic from Lakewood Townhomes to remain on their street, rather than'traveling through the existing development. Stop signs should not be necessary to control traffic at this intersection, since volumes will be very light and traffic from the new develop- ment to Meadowlark Road is minimal. Based on the above design parameters, the proposed new street will function as a private road, meeting all municipal standards for design, maintenance and operation. Yours truly, WESTWOOD PLANNING h EN'GIN�EEEERIING� COMPANY • Kenneth W. Anderson, P.E. KWA/dg TRAFFIC FLOW PLAN 00/00 AM/PM iPARK. PRO x/80 MEADOWLARK' Roan D 00D PLANNING a ENGINEER NG COM ANY 751S WATLTA BOULEVARD. MINNEAVOSIE. MN. 161]6($12)SA04DISS remI L-AKEW.00D- TOWN OMES - • •. 0 • 0 P� �O 3� 3d R 1 END CURB AND GUTTER AT PROPERTY LINE. `3 _ / • / Y .-'STREET SECTION "-)- (NO SCALE) 3 41 321 - - -- - - 30, D4-12 CURB AND GUTTER ENGIN EERNO COMPANY 7415 wATUTA SOULEV"D. YINkEAPOLR YN. MM (8117 6Y01Y LAKEWOOD _. - TOWNHOMES ; __-- .- ail MEADOWLARK ROAD 1 ' 332 R 35R r 3WR 35'R 32' w - � .-._LAKEWOOD �, WESTWOOD PLANNING b ENGINEERING COMPANY _---0 W N H O" E S 7411 WAYZATA /OOMAX0. MINNEA10LM MN. 1343101X34-0133 5 RECEIVED JAN Ellen Mosher Athletics, Inc. Post Office Box 14310, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414. Phone (612) 452-3680 • • • January 20, 1984 Mr. Chuck Hall Chairman, Advisory Planning Committee c/o Tom Hedges Eagan City Manager 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN. 55122 Dear Mr: Hall, I wanted to take this opportunity to express my opinion as an owner -resident of Meadowlark Ridge Homeowners Association. It is my understanding that the adjoining property has been zoned a high density area and that there is a development plan that has been brought before the Eagan city planner that proposes a 112 unit townhouse project. I also understand that there could be as many as over 200 apartment units that could be built in this area. As a resident, I feel that it would to favor the plan that would guarantee a townhouse units with the lowest density with the tremendous growth in the Eagan be developed in the very near future. As the appreciation value of my unit, I wou that we push to accept the proposed plan 3W4 be in our best interest majority of owner -occupied possible. I feel that area, this land will surely an owner interested in ld definitely recommend rather than try to delay the inevitable and risk ending up with a very high density rental apartment unit that would adjoin our property. Thank you for the consideration of my opinion. I hope that you will share it with the other membees of your committee. Sincerely, Ellen Mosher 1782 Meadowlark Road 51 January 24, 1984 Advisory Planning Commission City of Eagan Eagan, Minn. Dear Advisory Planning Commission: As a homeowner and resident of a Meadowlark Ridge Townhcme I have seriously assessed the implications of the proposed Lakewood Townhone project. The analysis was done first as a homeowner and second as a Realtor. In my personal and professional opinion I feel the proposed project will be a valuable asset to the neighborhood. I don't believe there would be any traffic or safety problems resulting from the private road connecting Meadowlark Rd. with Blackhawk Road. I do feel the project will increase the value of our property • especially with the lower density proposal and the design of the project. Addressing the original position paper submitted to the City of Eagan, a number of the homeowners feel the paper was submitted on behalf of a group of individual homeowners and not a true representation of the association as a whole. Because of this I personally circulated a petition for the support of the project to determine the feelings of the individual homeowners. I spoke with only 2 homeowners who where opposed to the proposal and one undecided. The rest of'the hamowners I contacted supported the proposal. Attached is the. petition which was circulated. I ask the Commission to consider the petition signed by individual homeowners. This is evidence of support for the Lakewood Townhcme proposal and approval by the Commission for the preliminary plat. Thank you, ,�ta„uu �%iLat,d�Cc�,J Reenie Madden 4095 Meadowlark Court Eagan, Minn. 0 70 PETITION TO EAGAN CITY ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: MEADOWLARK RIDGE TOWNHOME OWNERS • RE: LAKEWOOD TOWNHOME PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION HILLANDALE ADDITION NO. 2 We, the undersigned, are Meadowlark Ridge Townhome owners and occupiers in Eagan, Minnesota. We are aware of the preliminary plat application submitted by Gensmer Companies, Inc. and Michael Construction for construction of 112 townhouse units on the property located adjacent to our townhouse project. It is our belief that the development project as submitted would be a valuable asset to the neighborhood. The project's low density together with its design would increase the value of our homes. We do not believe that there would be any traffic or safety problem caused by the project's private road connecting to Meadowlark Rd. and Blackhawk Rd. We therefore support the application for the project, and hence do not agree with the "Position Paper to the City of Eagan" dated November 22, 1983 submitted to the City of Eagan by the two presidents of the homeowners associations # 1 and # 2. Thank you. Name Date Address �,� U/i�-d..ti.,.� i- /9- P5/ �a9�i�A�u��-�-. Com• �..� ie« L • _,- -�ar� / — a o - O �/ f� `i f`' //l{�a��sc�� Irk p �-� � �n�rv�f.J 1 - 3� - 8 `l `�0 5'7 n%egd•..v li�rCi��-F, (_22-8y (-)60 /1`�� fit.,;:/�•�r �7 7/ Page 2 Petition to City of Eagan • Name �[?� Date • • 71 Address • • �.FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION RE: • •Y PAINS REMEATION CU44ISSICN AMON HILLANDALE ADDITION The Advisory Parks and Recreation Conmuission at its regular meeting on December 1, 1983 reviewed the proposed Hillandale Addition #2. After review of the caumission of the proposed addition, the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission moved to recommend to the City Council that a cash dedication requxsement be made. Further, that staff worked with the developer to determine whether a tot lot was suitable for the site. If such a tot lot could be worked into the site, it was recommended that such a play area be included as a requirement of the park dedication. cc: Dale Runkle, City Planner Toim Colbert, Director of Public Works Paul Hauge, City Attorney 73 APC Minutes 46 January 24, 1984 is Secretary. McCrea moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion that Doris Wilkins be the Secretary for 1984. Wold moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to close the nominations and cast unanimous ballot for Doris Wilkins. All voted in favor. Assessment Committee. Garrett Mulrooney volunteered to be a member of the Eagan Assessment Committee for 1984 and the Chairman appointed him to the Committee. Planning Commission Meeting Procedures. Chairman Hall reviewed the procedures for Planning Commission meetings with the commission members and with all persons present at the meeting. MINUTES December 15, 1983 _ Regular Meeting. Upon motion by Wilkins, seconded McCrea, it was resolved that the minutes of the December 15, 1983 meeting be approved as distributed. All voted in favor eXcept Krob who abstained, indi- cating he was not present at the meeting. RILLANDALB ADDITION 90. 2 - PRELIMNARY PLAT The continued hearing regarding the application of Michael Construction, Inc. for preliminary plat approval of Hillandale Addition No. 2 consisting of 12.58 acres and containing approximately 112 dwelling units located in parts of Lot 2, Block 1, Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Lot 2, -Block 2 and Outlot A, Hillandale No. 1 in Section 20 was then convened by Chairman Hall. The application was first presented to the Planning Commission in November, 1983 and additional. information was requested, including traffic information, which has now been submitted by Westwood Planning h Engineering Company. It appears from the information that the proposed road specifications would be adequate to handle the additional 112 dwelling units in the proposed project. Dale Runkle reviewed the information that had been submitted, and further stated that another question that arose was whether the streets should be public or private. The setbacks would not be sufficient under the proposed plan if public right-of-way were required and thus the reason for the request for private right-of-way, but the developers do agree to install the streets with public street construction standards. In addition, the proposal is to build to the property line of I -35E in order to get adequate width to develop the property. It was noted there would be a gross density of 8.9 dwelling units per acre. Mr. Runkle noted the trade offs in regard to the type of develop- ment the City wants to have in the area, whether it be lower density or higher density in the event that the variances are not granted, are issues that the Planning Commission must decide. Mr. Hall stated that three letters have been 2 74 APC Minutes • January 24, 1964 submitted to the City, including one from the Minnesota Department of Trans- portation regarding location of the fence along I -35E and two letters, with a petition in support of the project. Mr. Runkle also stated that the proposed project does not meet the mandatory requirements for an EAw but the City could, in its discretion, require'the worksheet. A new diagram showing the area that would be taken for public street was displayed and Greg Du'Monceaux, the architect, appeared for the applicant and stated that if the project is not approved, the only other alternate for development would be an apartment type project. Karen Jensen, President of Meadowlark Homeowners Association No. 1 stated that her Association was opposed to apartment buildings and recommended a private street be installed. Jeff Johnson, a neighbor, stated that he was not opposed and had questions including whether a development contract would be entered into and whether the proposed plan will, in fact, be carried out. He also stated the neighboring owners wanted to be informed of the progress of the development, including whether any special signing or speed limits would be provided on ,the private streets. He stated the neigh- boring owners would prefer owner -occupied property but it was noted the City had no direct 'control over that type of provision. Member Krob had concerns about setbacks from streets and parking, but it was noted that parking does • exceed the minimum city requirements. Member McCrea recommended the Minnesota Department of Transportation letter concerning moving the fence be part of the Development Agreement including maintenance of the property along the fence. Doris Wilkins recommended a public street to be looped through the development and the developer indicated that he would prefer a private street. Mr. Du'Monceaux stated that it was his opinion that the Homeowners Association would have greater control with lower maximum speeds in the event of a private street, and further stated that there would be two phases over approximately two years. Member Krob moved, McCrea seconded the motion. to recommend approval of the application pursuant to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the variances in regard to setback from I -35E rights -of - way. 2. The Homeowners Association shall maintain the area between I -35E fence and the adjacent buildings which lies partially on MnDOT right-of-way. 3. A minimum of a 25 foot setback shall be required from the back of the curb to any dwelling unit or portion of dwelling unit in the development project. 4. A lot coverage variance not to exceed 2% shall be granted for the development. 5. A building setback variance shall be approved by the City along the I -35E boundaries in order to permit structures at a zero lot setback where a minimum of 50 feet is required. 3 7S APC Minutes 19 January 24, 1984 6. A private street loop shall be provided on proposed Lot 1 rather than a long, dead-end private street. 7. Concrete curbs shall be provided along the perimeter of all driving surfaces. 8. If individual units are to be sold, the developer shall provide a revised lot and.block plan. In any instance, the developer shall provide a phasing plan. 9. The City attorney shall reviewandapprove the proposed Articles of Incorporation, By -Laws and Restrictions of the Homeowners Association.to insure that proper access to a public street will be guaranteed for all properties and that the Association will maintain the private streets. 10. If the petitioner is requesting a model home and sales office, this shall be so designated as a part of the approval by the City with any appro- priate conditions related thereto. 11. Park dedication shall be satisfied in a manner determined by the • City Council after review by the Eagan Park Committee. 12. A landscape plan shall be submitted for review by the City staff and approval by the City Council with the approval of the final plat and the existing two Homeowners Associations shall review the plan. The landscape plan, through vegetative screens and berming, shall provide additional noise attenuation related to I -35E where necessary and practical. 13. If installed privately, plans and specifications for utility and street construction shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted ' to the Engineering Department for approval. 14. The private drives on Meadowlark Road shall form an intersection according to the eingeering plans approved by the City. 15. The existing right-of-way shall be vacated prior to final plat approval. 16. Easements shall be dedicated as required by the City. 17. This proposed development shall be responsible for trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 18. All costs associated with installing public improvements and private streets shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 19. Private streets shall be 32 feet wide and have concrete curb and gutter and bituminous surfacing according to City standards. 4 '7(9 APC Minutes January 24, 1984 20. No dead-end lateral water mains will be allowed.` _ tel. � - � v-� �a.� , v=..'A1+` S� o� � i..�++•�, ac o �jv`^^'��j` 'C Mr. Mulrooney recommended that public right-of-way be provided based upon the reasons outlined by the Engineering staff, including more control over maintenance, police and fire protection and general public safety. Those in favor were McCrea, Hall, Krob and Wold; against were Wilkins, Mulrooney and Merkley. Member Mulrooney stated the only reason he voted against the motion was he favored the public right-of-way in the project, and otherwise favored the proposal. THE RENTAL PLACE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The hearing egarding the application of Larry D. Peders for condi- tional use permit r The Rental Place for a pylon sign on of 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Additi\Ki onvened by Chairman Hall. Dal Runkle outlined the proposal and indthat the conditional use perm had been granted for outside storage location of a rental busin s on the lot, and it appeared that the psign would meet all th criteria of the sign ordinance including of spacing from 'the isting Kinney Shoe Sign. Contact had been madi ey Shoe but no det mination as to removal of the sign had yet beenMr. edersen was -pre ent and stated that he would comply with the 300acin Mulroone moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommendl of a applic ion, subject to the following conditions: I. All of the conditions regards the Sign Ordinance shall be adhered to regarding height, size and distance m other pylon signs. 2. The sign shall be renewe yearl\vkmRimANd� nce with the Sign Ordi- nance. All voted in favor. G 8, MIRIAM NAL The hearing regding the application of George 'A d Miriam Nall for a variance for the k ping of horses on a 4 1/2 acre pare of land zoned R-1 located at 3960 P of Knob Road was next convened. Dale nkle detailed the application and oted that the applicant now is requesting that 5 horses be stabled on the roperty. A sketch showing the proposed fenced area on the north proper line and a shed to the rear that would house the horses was reviewed by he Planning Commission. Alice and Ted Bolke were present and asked ques ons about the sheltering of horses and also the storage of numer- ous older cars on the east area of the property. Mrs. Nall stated the plan 5 �% Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Fifteen AMENDMENT/LEXINGTON SOUTH PUD B. Lexington South Inc., Jim Curry, for an Admendment to the Lexington South Planned Development to Exchange Land Uses on Two Parcels Within the Lexington South PUD -- A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on January 24, 1984, to consider an application submitted by Jim Curry for an amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development to exchanGe uses on two parcels within. the Lexington South PUD. T' he Adand visory Planning Commission is recommending ao� vel of the amendment to the planned development subject to conditions listed in the staff report. For a copy of the Planner's report addressing the amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development, refer to pages? 9 ^through !903 . For a copy of the Advisory Planning Commission minutes regarding action on this agenda item, refer to page(s) 2!j - ACTION 4 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development as requested by Lexington South Inc. • • • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT: JAMES CURRY LOCATION: W' OF THE Wig OF SECTION 23, PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF THE LEXINGTON SOUTH PUD EXISTING ZONING: R -II (MIXED RESIDENTIAL) WITH A DENSITY OF 3-6 DWG.UNITS/ACRE & R-III(MIXED RESIDENTIAL) 6-12 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 24, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 18, 1984 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a transfer of density from Parcel 2 to Parcel 3 of the Lexington South Planned Development, and conversely the transfer of density from Par- cel 3 to Parcel 2 in the Lexington South Planned Development located south of Wescott Road and east of Lexington Avenue, Section 23. COMMENTS • In review of the Lexington South Planned Development agreement, Exhi- bit "D" which designates the land use within the Lexington South Plan- ned Development indicates where the applicant is requesting to trans- fer or shift densities on two parcels within the Lexington South Plan- ned Development. Presently, Parcel 2 has an R -III land use or densi- ty approved which would allow 6-12 dwelling units per acre. The ap- plicant, at this time, is requesting to transfer this R -III density to Parcel 3 which presently has an R -II (Mixed Residential) with a density of 3-6 dwelling .units per acre and to transfer the R -II from Parcel 3 to Parcel 2 which was originally R -III. The net result, in looking at acreages and uses, is as follows on a small matrix that was put together to try to explain this change in uses: • 79 PRESENT AVERAGE DWG.UNITS TOTAL DWG. PARCEL LAND USE PER ACRE ACRES UNITS 2 R -III 9 132 1,188 3 R -II 4.5 40 180 1,368 PROPOSED CHANGE 2 R -II 4 132 528 3 R -III 12 40 480 1,008 79 CITY OF EAGAN AMENDMENT TO THE LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT • JANUARY 24,-1984 PAGE TWO Total development potential in this amended plan would consist of 1,008 dwelling units or a reduction of 360.dwelling units from what was originally approved in 1977. Therefore, the applicant is requesting that this revision be grant- ed for the following reasons: 1) The reduction in density. 2) In reviewing the surrounding land uses, there would be more of a transition in this development proposal from the 132 acres located in the southwest quadrant of Wescott Road and Lexington Avenue. 3) Parcel 2 would be designated R -II, Parcel 3 would be desig- nated R-IIIand the parcel south of Parcel 3 R -IV thereby making for more of a transitional development than going from an R -III to an R -II to an R -IV. Therefore, the transi- tion is much better in the proposed revision than what was originally approved in 1977. The last item staff would like to point out in regard to this propos- • ed change is in regard to the topographic features of this develop- ment proposal. Parcel 2 presently is fairly flat, open and rolling and would be much more conducive to the R -II (3-6 dwelling units per acre). It is staff's understanding that plans are being looked at to convert this to some type of single family duplex development vs. the townhouse or multiple which had been originally approved. In reviewing Parcel 3 containing 40 acres, the topography is quite scattered throughout the 40 -acre site working more with the topogra- phic restraints than what a lower density or residential character could provide for this proposal. When City staff received this request to change this to an R -III, staff wanted to make sure that a development plan could work showing the proposed increase in density and -how it would relate to the site and development of this parcel. With this, the applicant has provid- ed a site plan showing 25 multiple dwelling buildings varying from 15 dwelling units to 36 dwelling units each for a total development of 447 dwelling units. There appears to be adequate room to place the proposed buildings and parking areas on the site and have ade- quate green and open space surrounding this development proposal. Thus, in the sketch plan showing how the development works, it ap- pears that it can handle the additional units even though the topogra- phy is more severe than where it was originally proposed. Attached is a site plan showing how the transfer or increase in den- • sity would work on Parcel 3 for your review. .6 •CITY OF EAGAN AMENDMENT TO THE LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT JANUARY 24, 1984 PAGE THREE • 1-1 L If this amendment is approved, it should be subject to the following conditions: 1) An amendment be initiated and the land use exhibits changed in the Lexington South Planned Development agreement. 2) The densities be spelled out where Parcel 3 would be allow- ed to be transferred to an R -II land use with a maximum density of 528 dwelling units and that Parcel 3 have a land use of R -III (6-12 dwelling units) with no more than 480 total dwelling units approved on the overall site. DCR/jack II l s ► 11 � _►:. �.,:�; � @ y y Y � ' '� III y t t■ • O li n u a u d E — r � �ry06tD �I q 88 At is � •" .. ,' -. � J .�-- ' � 7 � I -. .� - • , • ..t� I I ;/ ,rye � -, I � 1 � w I •/� '�• 1 I _�\ II 4-VI� lit -~f' :. ��! ._ ,•�•.: �J� :.�. i, �.r '-r- �:. '1i. �:y.w�'•,' - .. _.- ...._:��'_; �'c rim, r .�.. r ;1/� 1 �.: N ✓�"� � �I /.� � •' I I • I I ■�1N■ MINIM% •k L •}f�� i:.•_ ' • .}:',`::.} v L.} h{f rtf�j :'i{ �I ti•1..� . •`.]�• .1:4yyJL.••�{{ti4Y vrr •L f�-0( �N �. 4 li •�' 14 �}�Ln V. ' kW r • • 1 til-}�JyL y.}{.L.4; ;y }y'•�,fRR• �'l•l • M.{�:r,•;{"'l•:;: n. r fir•}lf.�.�:• ti}'{�•: LLL .� :•y �, � x: l V.ir...lf l$ �{'[yll'.';•:l: 44 :.. {{y}:; •!r' $� ,,yam{{,':41} 4.{kl1' '•V .l{{.11ll;.V{ • }: ff.; p L P I. . i APC Minutes . January 24, 1984 ::ii , 1'''. .. 1 The hearing concerning the application of James Curry for amendment to the Lexington South Planned Development to transfer densities from R-2 (Mixed Residential Densities) and R-3 (Mixed Residential Densities) on two parcels east of Lexington Avenue and north of County Road #30 (Diffley Road) was next heard. Mr. Runkle explained the application and noted that the total dwelling units, according to minimum standards would be reduced from 1,368 to 1,008 units under the proposal. Jim Curry and Bruce Patterson of Suburban Engi- neering were present. Mr. Patterson reviewed some topographic constraints resulting in the amendment request and showed three concepts reflecting density and a fourth showing multiples with 12 to 36 units per building. A number of neighboring owners were present with questions but no objections. The transition, according to the plan, would provide for R-2 to R-3 to R-4 as proposed. It was also requested that the Planned Development Agreement be revised to limit the specific number of units that would be permitted per parcel and that there be no shifting of densities in the future. Chairman Hall stated that the potential for development -would be about 1,764 units and . the reduction would be to about 1,140 units if the maximum allowable were granted. McCrea moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: n U 1. An amendment shall be initiated and the land use exhibits changed in the Lexington South. Planned Development Agreement. 2. The densities shall be spelled out where Parcel 3 would be allowed to be transferred to an R -II land use with a maximum density of 528 dwelling units and that Parcel 3 have a land use of R -III (6-12 dwelling units) with no more than 480 total dwelling units approved on the overall site. It was also recommended that the owners of the parcels noted as excep- tions, should continue to monitor the development and attempt to provide for tie-ins of their parcels to future development. All voted in favor except Hall who abstained.. 7 $4 C -I J Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Sixteen PRELIMINARY PLAT/THE PINES C. Roger Kreidberg, RLK Corporation, for a Preliminary Plat, The Pines, Consisting of Approximately 3.65 Acres Containing 26 Condominium Units -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their January 24, 1984, meeting to consider an application for preliminary plat entitled The Pines which consists of approximately 3.55 acres and contains 26 to•.cnhouse units located on Lot 11, Block 3, Hilltop Estates. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending aRp-rQval of the preliminary plat subject to a number of conditions contained within the staff report. For additional information on this item, refer to the City Planner's report, copies enclosed on pages J! (o through/p a For a copy of the action taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to page (s) /Og— /09 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the application for preliminary plat entitled The Pines. SS CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - THE PINES APPLICANT: RLK CORPORATION, ROGER KREIDBERG LOCATION: LOT 11, BLOCK 3, HILLTOP ESTATES EXISTING ZONING: R-3 (RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 24, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 18, 1984 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting preliminary plat approval, The Pines, which consists of approximate- ly 3.65 acres and contains 26 townhouse units located on Lot 11, Block 3, Hilltop Estates, Section 22, directly north of Berry Ridge Road and east of Pilot Knob Road. ZONING AND LAND USE 4. • Presently, the parcel is zoned R-3 (Residential Townhouse District) and would only allow a townhouse development proposal. The proposed land use plan designates this parcel as R -I (Residential Single Dis- trict). Since the property is presently zoned Residential Townhouse District, the zoning would supersede the proposed Land Use Guide. COMMENTS As you may recall, there was an application submitted for preliminary plat in April of 1982. The preliminary plat was called Berry Ridge Condominiums. The applicant was the same as the applicant submitting this application. The original Berry Ridge Condominiums consisted of 26 dwelling units and contained underground garages with the develop- ment proposal. The original plat has expired and the applicant has not requested a continuance because of the type of structure proposed with underground garages which were not feasible to construct and sell in a market they were looking to obtain. Therefore, the original Ber- ry Ridge Condominiums are no longer a viable plat, and the applicant has now submitted a new application called The Pines which also is a townhouse development consisting of 26 dwelling units, but there will be no underground parking; there will be attached and detached garages with the development proposal. The parcel contains 3.65 net acres; there are no ponding areas, street rights-of-way or any other dedication to be subtracted from this par- ticular parcel. The platting of Lot 11, Block 3, Hilltop Estates, is net land free of any right-of-way for this development proposal. LL CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMI14ARY PLAT - THE PINES • JANUARY 24, 1984 PAGE TWO The applicant is proposing to again construct 26 dwelling units which is just under the maximum density allowed for this R-3 zoning. The maximum density allowed is 26.49 dwelling units for this tract of land. The development proposal consists of 18 two-bedroom units, 6 one -bedroom units and 2 three-bedroom units and will be marketed in the price range of $60,000-$75,000 per unit. In reviewing the lot coverage for this particular parcel, the two buildings and garages cover approximately 10.3% of the overall site. In reviewing this development proposal, the access proposed is off of Berry Ridge Road and dead -ending on the easterly end of the second townhouse or condo- minium building. Staff has looked at the potential of a loop street system. However, the grades are such that it is not feasible to con- nect the private access to Berry Ridge Road on the easterly edge of the plat. Staff had suggested that the driveway between the two con- dominium buildings be widened in order that a fire truck could be turned into and turned around in this area in order to provide bet- ter access for emergency vehicles. In review of the proposed development, the applicant meets all other ordinance requirements in 4eg'ard to setbacks, and the applicant is proposing to keep,as many of the existing trees which now exist on • the southerly edge of the property as is possible. There has been an actual survey of the trees showing their present location, and the majority of these trees will stay as development is constructed around the existing topography and vegetation. If approved, the preliminary plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) Two lots be created in order that each building would fit on an individual lot. 2) The development agreement shall be completed prior to the con- struction of any dwelling units. 3) A homeowner's association be established and the articles of declaration and bylaws be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to the submission of final plat. 4) A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and an adequate landscape be provided and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed. 5) The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comment because it abuts County road right-of-way. DCR/jach • •CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT - THE PINES JANUARY 24, 1984 PAGE THREE ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS - THE PINES PRELIMINARY PLAT 6) A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be submitted for approval depicting the proposed measures to sta- bilize side slopes and disturbed areas. 7) A storm sewer detection ponding system must be constructed in the NE; of this proposed development. 8) Adequate utility easements must be provided over the water main hydrant lead extensions. 9) This development shall be responsible for its residential street equivalent assessment for the 283 feet of front foot- age adjacent Pilot Knob Road to cover future upgrading. The final escrow amount shall be determined utilizing 1258 of the residential street equivalent rate for multiple dwellings at the time of final plat approval. RMH/jach Y . • • MEMO TO: THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION, C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: RICHARD M. HEFTI, P.E., ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: JANUARY 17, 1984 SUBJECT: THE PINES, PRELIMINARY PLAT The Engineering Division of the Department of Public Works has the following comments regarding this proposed development for consid- eration by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. DRAINAGE/TOPOGRAPHY The existing topography of this site consists of a side hill with relatively steep slopes. The slopes range from 98-208 with the steeper slopes being generally located along the southerly portion. Also, the southerly pertion of this development is rather heavily wooded with pine trees. The remainder of this parcel consists of grassland. The existing drainage over this parcel is split with approximately the westerly third draini-ng.in a northwesterly direction and even- tually discharging into Pond JP -36, which is just south of St. John Neumann Church. The easterly two-thirds of this site drains in a northeasterly direction and eventually ends up in Pond JP -48. Fi- gure 1 illustrates the relationship of the drainage of this propos- ed development with the City's Master Storm Sewer Plan. At this time, neither of the previously mentioned ponds have con- trolled outlets. However, staff does not feel any action is neces- sary to provide outlets for either pond at this time for several reasons. For one thing, the proposed grading will not be signifi- cantly altered from its present patterns as a result of site grad- ing to accommodate this proposed development. Although the volume of storm water runoff will increase due to the roofs and paved sur- O faces, the runoff from the westerly one-third of this proposed de- velopment discharging eventually into Pond JP -36 is not significant with respect to the relatively large size of that pond. Similarly, a controlled outlet is not recommended at this time for Pond JP -48 as long as approximately 508 of the additional runoff from the wes- terly two-thirds of this development is detained in a small ponding area near the northeast corner of this parcel. With this pond, an overflow across the natural vegetation can be allowed and should create no greater problems than the present drainage. In addition, this pond could also serve as a sedimentation pond to improve the quality of this runoff. The proposed site grading over this parcel will require significant • amounts of excavation and fill resulting in relatively steep slopes. Subsequently, it is recommended that for maintenance purposes and slope stabilization purposes that slopes on this proposed develop- ment be a minimum of 3:1. In addition, staff would recommend a VE ENGINEERING REPORT THE'PINES PRELIMINARY PLAT • JANUARY 17, 1984 PAGE TWO detailed grading and erosion control plan be required to be submit- ted for approval, and also a landscape plan depicting how slope sta- bilization will be handled. UTILITIES Water service is available from an existing 8" diameter water later- al in Berry Ridge Road. However, it will be necessary to extend 6" diameter watermain into this property to provide for two hydrants to provide adequate fire protection. Also, sanitary sewer service is available from the existing sanitary sewer trunk line which lies 10' north of the north line of this property. This development will be allowed to tap into this line provided they acquire the necessary City permits. STRPRTS Existing streets bordering this proposed development consist of Pi- lot Knob Road to the west.and Berry Ridge Road to the south. Pilot Knob Road is a rural two-lane paved roadway under the jurisdiction of Dakota County, and subsequently is subject to access control. Berry Ridge Road is a residential street built to its ultimate de- sign (32' wide with bituminous surfacing and concrete curb and gut- • ter) and is under the City's jurisdiction. Pilot Knob Road is an- ticipated to be upgraded in the near future to a major collector col- lector street status by Dakota County. Subsequently, staff would recommend that either this development escrow its share of the im- provement costs for Pilot Knob Road upgrading or this development' signs a waiver of hearing for assessments for this improvement and it be listed as a pending assessment. Access to this proposed development is being proposed from Berry Ridge Road and is located approximately 170' east of the centerline of Pilot Knob Road. 0 Due to the existing topography, the alignment of the private drive is very limited. Subsequently, staff feels the parking and drive- way layout is laid out in the best arrangement given the circum- stances. However, in order to facilitate emergency vehicles such as fire trucks in gaining access to the easterly building, staff would recommend that the garage arrangement for the westerly build- ing be the same as for the easterly building. Also, large radiuses should be provided for the north driveway common to both buildings to facilitate maneuvering of the City's fire emergency vehicles. Figure 2 illustrates this recommendation. Finally, staff would recommend that a minimum of 50' of the drive- way approach to Berry Ridge Road be at a maximum of a 2% grade. • 0 ENGINEERING REPORT • THE PINES PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 17, 1984 PAGE THREE EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY All right-of-way for Berry Ridge Road and Pilot Knob Road have been previously dedicated under the Hilltop Estates plat. In addition, all adequate easements have been dedicated with the exception that additional easements will be required over the 6" watermain hydrant leads. ASSESSMENTS All trunk related assessments have been levied to this property. The only other assessment required is for the future upgrading of Pilot Knob Road as previously discussed. Current City policy would require a residential equivalent assessment for the 283.0 feet of frontage on Pilot Knob Road. A current estimated residential equi- valent rate would be $37.00 per front foot resulting in an assess- ment of $10,471.00. Therefore, it would be staff's recommendation to put $10,471.00 in escrow and utilize for the Pilot Knob project when it is carried out in conjunction with the Dakota County Highway Department. I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report in further • detail at the Planning Commission meeting of January 24, 1984. Respectfully submitted, Richard M.kfti, P.E. Assistant City Engineer RMH/jach • 7t 0 \ •- I 6 1 I \ \ i �:. •- � .. Zi ���� A 5 ;G 5 Garages zu ED �WJu ZP 10 / } , 4-GAvages I I I I r %1' / / �•9e I / � I 1 � ! t _ drag i rN 131 1-10 E OUTLINE SPECIFICATION Local Aat hurity Eagan,- Minnesota Project No. • or Developer j – Project Name Architect Arvid Elness Architects, Inc. Location Berry Ridge Condominiums Date hIlSTNUCTIovs: Describe all materials and equipment to be used Include no alternates ur equivalews. Show extent of work and typical details on draw•ingt rlitach additional sheets if necessary to completely describe the ..,wk. The Cost lirtinmte will recognize quality products and nwterials in excess of acceptable minimums, when specified. Certain /wrrs of the work .anent he put in their proper classification until pure infomwtion about their nwte ials and contrucritm it known: therefore describe. under notable categories helow, lire following: main terrier and other stairs, treads. risers, handrail; behalert, ere.: tourrd insulation of l,artitium and floors separating al,urunents and heM•rcn alwrrncnis and public spans, utility conduits and tunnels, water pratfing and drainage. utilities. and related inrulatio retaining walls: garages and oceestnry buildings: and off-site improvements required to serve the project such as roads. Gohr, walks, utilities. norm sewers, plashing, roc. To include definitions and nroiect close out. 2. SITEWORK: assume 2.000 lb. Type of Soil Soil aSSLsnled as per rePOrt ; Bearing Capacity is , Material and thickness of fill and base course. Demolition: Construction of structures to be demolished and materials to be reused. Other land improvements. parking landscaj)e Storm Drainage: Culverts, pipes, manholes, catch basins, downspout connection (dry well, splash blocks, storm sewer). Site Preparation: Tree protection, surgery, wells, walls, topsoil stripping, clearing, grubbing, and rough grading. Site preparation to. include tree protection, clearing, TOugh grading, excavating stripping and stockpiling --removal if necessary. Curbs and Gutters: Type and material. - Pavement: Material and thickness of base and wearing surface for drives, parking areas, streets, alleys, courts, walks, drying yards and gyfay areas. Steps, handrails, the kwal s. itutTunOLIS Paving t�uc•ness as required by local conditions and city vehicle size. Possibly 2" wearing course over 4" to 6" gravel. Concrete walks with 6 x 6 - 10 x 10 w.w.f. over 4" gravel (concrete 4,000 psi air entrained). N i mens for Special Areas and Enclosures: Play equipment. benches, fences - — — Finish Grading: Approximate existing depth and method of improving topsoil. Extent of finish grading. see site plan - estimate till or soil r"lrn4wI Lawns and planting: Type, site, quantity and location of lawn, ground cover and hedge material, trees, shrub;, etc. Ntinv existing trees and ShrLbs to remain. Now trees and a conbination of seeding and sodding to repair site. Its much of site as possible to be left in relatively natural state. NOTE: This Outline is based an the "Uniform System" for Construction Specifications. Data Filing, and Cost Accounting developed by AIA. CSI, and AGC. Peg 1 a1 8 V.Y.. - Previous EJI1iow is Obsola tc HUD 5087 (9,911 94 ]. CONCRETE: Concrete strength for exterior walls below and above grade, interior walls and partitions, piers, footings, columns and • girders. Size, thickness and location on drawings. Note portions having reinforcing steel on drawings. Location, site and material of footing drains and outlet. Footincs: 3.000 psi reinforced concrete • 0 Concrete strengdt or rein Forcing determined bv`structural _ engineer. Structural system of concrete floors at basement, other floors and roof. Thickness of slabs and strength of concrete. Attached exterior concrete steps and porches. If more than one type of construction is used, list separately and state locations. 1st floor plan on grade 3,000 psi. Slab Perimeter Insulation: 1 1/2" extruded polystyrene on vertical face of foundation wall to frost line. - 0. MASONRY: Material and thickness of exterior walls above and below grade. interior walls and partitions, fire walls, stair, hall and elevator enclosures, chimneys, incinerators, veneer, sills, copings, etc. C.......t�+:.... .....11. on ..-.J 1011 _-_c ---- J 5. METALS: Miscellaneous Iron: Material and size of items such as: Access Doorsa� Area Gratings N Foundation Vents Lintels as required Fire Escapes none Structural Steel: Framing or structural system used. N/A rein[orcinc rods at reinforcing _ concrete block walls. 6. CARPENTRY: Size, spacing, and grade of lumber to be used for floor, roof, exterior walls above grade and interior partition framing, subfloor, sheathing, underlay ens and exterior fin! h materials (wood sidin , shingles, ash tos Win etc.). Exterior walls x b's at 2�" on centerDoug, or ��em. fir stud ¢rade___ All interior artitions - 2 x 4's at 16" on center, wood trctss_at 20" TJI at ?l' and ecn�cr at rooF. S/3" COX exterior 4 x-3 roof Shea df in . ' 4 Grade and species or interior and exterior linish work. g LxdCriQ:-,�,hca fiijg.-/2" 1" cLterior siclali wi.thNcch�ood_oz�pruce, lap- e.W 7 W a Ox W. 4s HUD -5087 17.e 11 7. MOISTURE PROTECTION: Materials and method of waterproofing walls and stabs below grade, location, thickness or number of plies. • Type of permanent protection of waterproofing (pa(ging) if used. Method of dampprooling above grade. Flathing materials if other than sheet metal. Spandrel waterproofing. 6 mil. vapor harrier below slabs on trade. Bittuninous watcthroofing below grade. Thermal Insulation: Thickness R•value and type of material. Method of installation. Exterior walls Full thickness batt - R-19 6" _ Ceiling below Root R- 38 It town insul at ion - Other Rpofing: Roof covering maters Is ad method of applic tion, weight of ;hi glee, pumper of tell plies bitumen, ate. Pitdted roots: 23 19. asphalt s�iilules wit�i 15 lb. felt UL class "C". Sheet Metal: Material and weight or gauge for flashings, copings, gutters and downspouts, roof ventilators, scuppers, etc. Flashing - 26 gage GI or n ilisb Caulking: Nonstaining by MONK) or GE. 8. DOORS, WINDOWS AND GLASS: • Windows and Frames: Type and Material. Special construction features or protective treatment. _Vinyl clad wood singlehung, double glazed or nrefinished aluminlml single hung_ wi t -h thermal break- screens. Balcony access and_walk. DLL1~leYC�d4ffT�:�All�iitlml Glazing: Thickness, strength and grade of glass and method al glaain i zona 1 S 11dCrS lJl to }TCrmal Ureal. S/3" insulated glass. Metal Curtain Walls: WA Doors and Frames: Exterior: Thickness, material and type at all locations. 1 3/4" solid wood with £lass lights and 1 3/4" insulated hollow metal. Fraooci—frame entry an hollow metal Interior: Thickness, material snd type for public hall% and stairs, apartments (entrance and interior), boiler rooms, lire doors and other Finish Hardware: Material and finish of exterior and interior lockols, sliding and folding door hardware, window and cabinet hardware, door closer, door knockers, numbers, etc. Prehlut¢ doors, closet doors, window and cabinet hardtvare faetory annLied. Remnininr I�" lardt.,are to be selected and Provided in harchaare schedule. • P.W d or a P.a.. HUD -5087 19811 M Weathersuipping: Material and Type. • Weatherstripping_—'– windows Factory .JiLicd------- -'-- - - -- .. _.._..- —------- --.. Exterior Doors 1;CCLl1dCC1-1'VGif�)o.t_f-)emn-applied._—_ _ Thresholds �I tal fl-a[-_Platc with hnish----_.....---'.---------.--'------.-'--...--.----. • Screens: Type and material of mesh and frames. RICtOty s11111)1LC(1 to nItCh WindOwSLt-L00(I Or Ill(lmintun. A11 velltti till) ied With factory provided screens. 9. FINISHES: Grade• material, and thickness of all finishes. Ceilings - sp_ray texture_ Walls - gy_ps(un boardpainted with Wood base --- - - — - ------ Floors - carpet. sheet vin -1— ----------'-- _-.--- _-- Painting: Type and number of coats. Exterior Interior Wood 2 stain or 1 primer/1 finish wood 1 primer, 1 finis') or prefinshcd Mefal- 1 primer, �in>s) en� al mel Metal 1 primer, 1 finis enamel Masonry Walls&Ceilings 1 coat Iii _build latex, spray .__ Kitchen & Bath 1 pr.imt r texture 1 finish (semi -gloss) Tile and Ceramic Bathroom Accessories: Floor and Wall Covering Materials: Thickness, gra! e. finish and wainscot height. LOCATION Units FLOORS M MATERIAL - HALLS Batliroorls Sheet vinyl 0.090" Painted hoard, wood b h. Sheet vinyl 0.090" Painted board wood b .. Living Rooms Bedrooms Carpet Painted boaicl wood it. - V s ibul Pavers Painted ). board wood b Stairs/Corrido s Carpet Painted I board, -wood h Bathroom Accessories: Material and Quantity. - Attached Soap dish, robe hook 2 towel bars toilet paper .l)older,_glass shower doo». _ Resilient Flooring: Location, type and gauge, for all materials. 0.090" sheet vinyl in bathrooJ�(itCllCnS and entries. 10. SPECIALTIES: List Significant Items. Coal Chutes N/A . Interior partitions other than concrete, masonry or wood. Central 'IV antenna system With outlets :111 unit. 11) for each unit. P.e. a of a ".e . 97 Ht ID-SOR7 19.R I I Ise Ise Ise Ise Ise MCdici a Cabinets: Materi I, size and type. _ • Stirrace motulted mirror—with horizontal c:tbine.t-14"-:x=350" ;Incld 1i�t._-- — --- Mail Boxes, Package Receivers. Packaged Incinerators. II. EQUIPMENT: Relrigerators: Capacity for each size of living unit. l4 CII. , two door.S? �Efr0 -- Cars ------- Kitchen Ranges: Size and type for each size of living unit. 30" electrical witJ� 4 burncr5,_ysnCC(LCtng�ILOOS�CaLs Kitchen Cabinets: Detail on drawings. Wall Units: Material Prefabricated Base Units: Material Prefabricated Counter Top and Backsplath Material Plastic laminate Other cabinets and built-in storage units: same cabinets in Equipment: Garbage disposal units, dishwashers, clothes washers and dryers. Hook In for wrsh r and dr✓er only--noyni^ Garbage disposal 12. FURNISHINGS: Finish Prefinished ' back Shades: Type of shades, venetian blinds or other devices for privacy and control of natural light. Shades all bedrooms Drapery tracks all living [nits 13. SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION: Incinerators — Job constructed. 14. CONVEYING SYSTEMS: Elevators: Attach letter from manufacturer whose elevator installation is proposed, containing a brief comprehensive specification for the complete elevator installation, and the manufacturers statement that the number of elevators proposed and the installation described will provide adequate service, and that manufacturer maintains an effective service organization in the project locality. 0 15. MECHANICAL: Plumbing and Hot Water Supply: Fixtures: Material, size, fittings, trim and color. Sink _2 comp. SS 32" X 22" sink Shower over tub Lavatory floor Inotmted v.Lnin, Stall Shower fibcrg),-I Water Closet kzLC--tank`type—floor_mltrited .._ Laundry Trays __, _,-- Bathtub lin Imcled formed steel Other e•w 5 or a n•a•• • H UD -SN 7 19a l l rI I Piping: Material Soillinn Cast iron Gas Lines Black Steel Waste Lines NIS plastic Stindpipes _ Vents ABS pl:istie _ Interior Downspouts NollC__ Water Copper type "I." Valve Shuiolf for Servicing [lotcold water ings- ps �hulIoff.— —_ Domestic Water Heating: Direct lir",' Type, capacity and recovery rate. GIs fired. mpgcity to be detci lim-d Indirect fired: Separate boiler or combined with space heating boiler. Storage and recovery capacity. Solar Energy: Application System Subsystem System Capacity Insulation: Type and thickness of insulation on water lines and water heating equipment. Heating: Kind of System: Hot water, steam, forced warm air'gravity warm air, air— Forced tcForced air. _ Fuel Used: gas Calculated Load: to be determined. Heating , Domestic Hot Water , Total Equipment: Make and Model Input (per hr.): Coal (lbs.) , oil (gals.) , gas (8TUH) Output (8TUH) Distribution System: duct to exterior Wall. Insulation: Type and thickness of insulation on heating equipment and distribution system. Room Heating Units: Baseboard units, radiators, convectors, registers, etc. Solar Energy: Subsystem System Capacity _, .___ Space Heaters: Type, make, model, location and output of heating systems such as wall heaters, floor furnaces and unit heaters. • Pie* 6 or 6 P -e -r r rUD .5011 7 (9-81) 99 - Temperature Controls: Individual unit, zone, central, etc. Individual till itswith theonozitalm..___...------- - Ventilation: Location, capacity and purpose of ventilating fans. 'rOi l et_CXJIj I LIS t,_k i tclien cAhal6t dtgtc<I._t0 outgido.,...... ... Air Conditioning: 'INJO Systems: 1. AC sleeves and panel covers with 120V outlet Unitary Equipment: Self Contained or packaged units. - below, 2. Central forced air system capahle with Calculated load: —_ LWing CO11dCiLStS ._____ Equipment: Make, model, operating voltage and capacity in RTUH for each sire serving individual rooms, apartment units, or zone. Central System: Calculated load: Equipment: Make; model capacity, etc., of compressor, condenser, cooling tower, water chillers, air handling equipment, and:other components which make up the complete system. Utilities On -Site: Material for distribution system for all piped utilities. Water Supply: fire hydrants, yard hydrants, lawn sprinkler systems, exterior drinking fountains. Gas: Sanitary Sgwerage: Treatment plants, pumping stations, manholes. Ex>sune sewer to illmhediate north of si Q 16. ELECTRICAL: - Electric Wiring: Type of wiring and load centers, number of circuits per unit, individual unit metering or project metering, spare conduit for future load requirements, radio or TV antenna systems. Show receptacles, light outlets, switches, power outlets, telephone outters, door bells, fire alarm systems, etc., on drawings. Individual unit meterinc: Smoke detectors al r-O.t1�L;11_-. Electric fixtures: Type for various locations. Units - incandescent throw h tt--cxsap.t--�--itctlen_sinhnd-bathrooa-sitik=_flouresmit. P.I 7 or a'.". HUD -5011719.811 • /OD Electric light standards for lighting grounds, streets, courts, etc. Underground or overhead service. Un cc—Tr rF otaid service to_strcc:t_p:�rki_ng.lot All items of construction, equipment and finish, togetherwithall incidentals, which are essential to the completion of the project will be provided whether or not specifically included in the exhibits and will be of a type, quality and capacity acceptable to HUO and appropriate to the character of the project. Pow a or a pages /O I HUD -5081 (9-81) v I $ � � I - r �iJ ConOgnriipla. _ _ `.. _ � • • : �, Bary Radpe Road t SRE PLAN 0 x PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION • FA I � I / Q+ronn idr ft m - Area CRk"adait Tar we 1545.09• an. 365.0.. w .v.n d wl. w NOC 1W. q w.r PXr.0 0...•r t t631 W n Pen l� W Q>s� Swc• r...nn LI IiaghY CakdfltlonS TB V.I. 0 1.+ 7.31 Inn r ParkkV Provided 35 exn..s 1.w 91J. 13-s .. JJ. as Pr.ry Twm PY•ry $IJf IP UM NJO 765 " G� The ......... iYa.1Y..1 ZV3 I;R4 12 TAU 1�,C �1'fv L9OURC15 rf RLK Corporation Roper KroleOerp, Pr 115 Western Avenu St. Paul. Minnesota Parry .O. Y.b('1 K Lb[fn�tL M1 -6100' e. 0 0 Burry Ridge Road I I }� SITE R11N • a..l. 1•- art mr—cj L + 1 Lam, I PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION Aowr, arY UTILITY PLAN Ah The er.,u�rarlr �. +aclc;�omasrt RLK Corporation RoBor Kr Old Garp• Pr 115 WOal Orn Avonu Sl. Paul. Minneaole 10-1001 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION Aowr, arY UTILITY PLAN Ah The er.,u�rarlr �. +aclc;�omasrt RLK Corporation RoBor Kr Old Garp• Pr 115 WOal Orn Avonu Sl. Paul. Minneaole 10-1001 t 0 �..-- o a o Hoer ee ! , ieg? ,' s. ' I :�/,��/ _ �, baa - �=._. .. (:• -L �• _a`a:. .t 8017 Woe Aoad I I SfTE R.AN 1 _ 3a 1� b J 1 PINES tnaYupelll r. ,Ca 4'1Z.�OfIR3 n] PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION PrwirN GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN RLK Coroorallon Roger Kraldborg, Pit' 115 Western Avomi $1. Paul, Mlriheeol e` 0 0 ,a=6p, r I' \\ I I PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION PrwirN GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN RLK Coroorallon Roger Kraldborg, Pit' 115 Western Avomi $1. Paul, Mlriheeol e` 0 0 ,a=6p, S.E I,':} SEC. 21,T27, R....., i 31 ( PILOT , II KNOB 7 ROAD 1 �"' COUNTY � ST TE AID �!� HIGHWAY ( �p Ulm .......... ........ 7f Cc v..ai::: v• , . Z M 10 1 WIN • ply n L >mw ''f:vi•::::::. �r ..: tiR. �.; ;.: - I 1 X. V� 1 `sz� }I8 I s 1 e' 0r • 7 '• st . ��I�r ♦ . nul urm! i I oil 0 �•![�•,X:� I � 8 ! �, s. • < I W it • Z dim � � � Vii' , I I d ,y�� .s a� • sq I s = a • i • �� ._ :�'� p is = .q a o. � a a�.... f• I 1 GB •- . /1, _- _ _ _�.. v�. Ra ..,.;.,�..�,__-- nL t GOLF.�. 5/u owl >- =I - . '':'•: ;;: •.:.. :. Ind.,��RCIALVELDPMENT E LB R -II •. " •� = Ind .>.._ II -_ - - - ..RI R -II' �. GB - .I - D R 9 - R -N- --- — - +'- -' --- - Ra ..,. ,.-.. 1 '•1'l , ... - . Ind. G R&D ' - v fel P i O r .. Ind. F NS R -III . _ Rfi •r ® Lg� _ Ik LB R -II a � Ral,.- ., CSC J+�, - -- :;� Ind. �- R41 R -I.: P GOLF •"': R -II _ _ 1 ;• .1'L lalf'• v =�L{ 11 Ind RillR-1- - " .Fq E p -- N ter. _R•III fir- P j �" ,QTY R41RLI i' HS ". . R -II R•1 .,Q R-11 _— R-11�' •� R=11 - R -III : R II r :: _`-r_: M i• �' R -ill RB--- ( R-Ilt R'lll - - Rli�7li:="�`;"'•_���>\ �`. R41 CSClGB/L R -111 R -1 % 1. p R-112• ;!ss. R -II R -II ,� y.r•� t.: :. f+Y -i' R -II .... - R-IIe-v�.:• a _ 458 • �4'�-•.,,...•,�,. - - •'i•: -R•I.c�- P J.J. �+': ••-: i`•!`-% r• ,.:. .. �:✓,r .. .. iNB LB :.F}I' :+/;:• _ CSC RB LB - r R I P 1,' R-1 C i _- / c cc�w rr PI _ R -II Pi R -II •� ;i.�yly' wa• I R4- j�, R -II I P o ;ROSENOU:r: /,--LLEY APC Minutes • January 24, 1984 THE PINES - PRELININARY PLAT The next hearing presented to the Planning Commission was the application of R.L.K. Corporation and Roger Kreidberg for preliminary plat approval of The Pines. The proposal is for 26 townhouse units located in Lot 11, Block 3, Hilltop Estates consisting of 3.6 acres north of Berry Ridge Road and east of Pilot Knob Road. Dale Runkle detailed the proposal with the Council and stated that Mr. Kreidberg submitted an application for preliminary plat approval in April of 1982. At that time, underground garages were proposed with only one building. The new application proposed two buildings and no underground garages but some detached and some attached garages. The zoning is R-3 and the maximum density allowed is 26.49 dwelling units with the project to consist of 18 two-bedroom units, 6 one -bedroom units and 2 three- bedroom units being marketed in the $60,000.00 to $75,000.00 price range. Topographic constraints on this parcel create some problems with its develop- ment. Staff recommended that the drive between the two buildings be widened. in order that a fire truck could be turned around. Mr. Kreidberg and his architect from Arvid Elness Architects was present. Mr. Kriedberg stated they will retain nearly all of the pine trees and that they would accept the garage revision to allow greater space between the two buildings. Single phase • construction is planned with one building built at a time. One neighboring family was present and had concerns about the grade of Berry Ridge Road and it was noted that the Pilot Knob Road elevation may eventually be changed. Also, they had concerns about the additional traffic on Berry Ridge Road which potentially would be created from the site. Two fire hydrants will be pro- vided on the site, according to the architect. No play areas are being proposed because the developer expects that there will be very few children in the units. There was considerable discussion concerning the recommendation of the engineering staff for a residential street equivalent assessment covering the 283 feet of frontage on Pilot Knob Road for future Pilot Knob Road up- grading. Mulrooney moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. Two lots shall be created in order that each building would fit on an individual lot. 2. The development agreement shall be completed prior to the construc- tion of any dwelling units. 3. A homeowner's association shall be established and the articles, declarations and bylaws shall be rLeviewed by the City Attorney prior to the submission of the final plat. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and an adequate land- scape bond shall be provided and not released until one year after the land- scaping has been completed. • • • APC Minutes January 24, 1984 5. The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review and comment because it abuts County Road right-of-way. 6. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be sub- mitted for approval depicting the proposed measures to stabilize side slopes and disturbed areas. 7. A storm sewer detention ponding system, shall be constructed in the NE 1/4 of this proposed development. 8. Adequate utility easements shall be provided over the water main hydrant lead extensions. 9. This development shall be responsible for its residential -street equivalent assessment for the 283 feet of front footage adjacent Pilot Knob Road to cover future upgrading. The final escrow amount shall be determined utilizing 125% of the residential street equivalent rate for multiple dwell- ings subject to reconsideration, modification or elimination by the City Council at the time of final plat approval. 10. That the garages on the east end of the West building shall be realligned to allow greater emergency vehicle turning area. All voted in favor, except Hall who opposed the provision regarding escrowing funds for future Pilot Knob Road upgrading and stated that the City has not required that in the past. Mulrooney then moved, Hall seconded the motion to request the staff undertake a study concerning the propriety and procedures of advanced collections for potential assessments for public im- provements, including street improvements prior to the improvements being installed and that the staff report its findings to the City Council. All voted in favor. 4TH ADDITION - PEO.IIO kfy PLAT The application of T Land Company and adley Swenson for preliminary plat approval of Sunset 4th ition, cons ing of approximately 15.16 acres with 32 single family lots in paN of t Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 25 south of Dif a Road, west of Saddlehorn Addition and north of Hackmore Dri/undR-1 t h Dale Runkle introduced the project and noted the parcel 1 ned D elopment and is a part of Lexington South PD. The proposa is R -II th a density of 3 to 6 units per acre and the overall y would cont 2.2 dwelling units per acre. The minimum guidelines zoning will be m in the proposal and it was noted the applicant ia looped street, Sunset Drive, which would provide access to allle family lots south of Yorktown Place. Brad I 9 L • • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Seventeen CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/THE RENTAL PLACE D. Larry D. Pedersen, The Rental Place, for a Conditional Use Pylon Business Sign -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission .at their last regular meeting held on January 24, 1984, to consider an application submitted by Larry D. Pedersen, The Rental Place, for a pylon business sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition in Section 19. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the conditional use permit. For additional information --- reeffer to the City Planner's report, copies enclosed on pages /// through IIS For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to pages) IJ (o . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for a pylon business sign as presented by Larry D. Pedersen. Ho • CITY OF EACAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: LARRY D. PEDERSEN, THE RENTAL PLACE LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BARTON MCGRAY ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 24, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 19, 1984 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a con- ditional use permit for a pylori sign advertising The Rental Place lo- cated on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition. COMMENTS As you may recall, the original application submitted was a request • for a conditional use permit for outside storage for the location of a rental place business on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition. Along with that application, there was also a request for a pylon sign.. Since staff did not publish the legal notice specifically for the pylon sign, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed use recommending approval and also a direction that they would approve the pylon sign if it would meet all of the criteria of the Sign Ordi- nance. In reviewing the pylon sign, the top of the sign would be no more than 27 feet in height and the signage area per side would con- tain no more than 124 feet of signage. It appears that the proposed sign would meet all of the criteria of the Sign Ordinance. In trying to check this exact location with the existing sign from the old Kinney Shoe, it could be very close to being 300 feet from that particular sign. If this sign.is approved, the Planning Commission may want to make the recommendation that it be placed 300 feet from the sign of the old Kinney Shoe northwest of this particular lot. However, the Kin- ney Shoe sign has .not been renewed and should be taken down. If a 300 -foot spacing could be maintained, it would be less conflict in the future if and when Kinney Shoes would convert to a different use just northeast of this particular lot. If approved, the pylon sign should be approved subject to the follow- ing conditions: • 1) All of the conditions regarding the Sign Ordinance be adhered to regarding height, size and distance from other pylon signs. CITY OF EAGAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - LARRY D. PEDERSEN • JANUARY 24, 1984 PAGE TWO 2) The sign be renewed yearly in accordance with the Sign Ordinance. DCR/jach Aga E E PAP401 / t K • /HC � S" LNr� 'N/I[[ y 1LUM c �:.Odl7�set/Y� TU'7F� i�iT;'q C'I'•(�IN�•�r'CLI�S 0 /9'3„ , 7! 10 al DlZ"O1 SUBJECT P •�7 �t3 00 F j1js d p10-00 It !f. X14 py3-12 0 a••ua. •(�Il-tl L�.•r d AM �e 7 ■ py3-12 a••ua. •(�Il-tl L�.•r py3-12 I �Z IIA k� NU I FSILL LI q / .`• ,tom=tirr;� ;. o LI y 1 c \ GPg GLS Uh GB 14 1 . DOG r T PF t o / ml r B-2 SCHOOL i _ . ..� .�•.... k1l Ii --7- � L .:,,:� PARCEL Ll 41 I �Z IIA k� NU I FSILL LI q / .`• ,tom=tirr;� ;. o LI y 1 c \ GPg GLS Uh GB 14 1 JUNIOR T PF o HIGH ml r B-2 SCHOOL i 0 p qW PF� vc 0 L R-4 CE �Nousr ia� PF '�► Nrt!IL 5 �E 9 _ 10E umuun rr.: 0 W - APC Minutes • January 24, 1984 20. No dead-end lateral water mains will be allowed. Mr. Mulrooney recommended that public right-of-way be provided based upon the reasons outlined by the Engineering staff, including more control over maintenance, police and fire protection and general public safety. Those in favor were McCrea, Hall, Krob and Wold; against were Wilkins, Mulrooney and Merkley. Member Mulrooney stated the only; reason he voted against the motion was he favored the public right -of -Way in !the project, and otherwise favored the proposal. THE RENTAL PLACE - COHDIMOHAL USE PEMT The hearing regarding the application of Larry D. Pedersen for condi- tional use permit for The Rental Place for a pylon sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition was convened by Chairman Hall. Dale Runkle outlined the proposal and indicated that the conditional use permit had been granted for outside storage for the location of a rental business on the lot, and it appeared that the proposed sign would meet all the criteria of the sign ordinance including the 300 foot spacing from the existing Kinney Shoe Sign. • Contact had been made with Kinney Shoe but no determination as to removal of the sign had yet been made. Mr. Pedersen was present and stated that he would comply with the 300 foot spacing. Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. All of the conditions regarding the Sign Ordinance shall be adhered to regarding height, size and distance from other pylon signs. 2. The sign shall be renewed yearly in accordance with the Sign Ordi- nance. All voted in favor. GEORGE A MIRIAN HAIL - VARIANCE The hearing regarding the application of George and Miriam Nall for a variance for the keeping of horses on a 4 112 acre parcel of land zoned R-1 located at 3960 Pilot Knob Road was next convened. Dale Runkle detailed the application and noted that the applicant now is requesting that 5 horses be stabled on the property. A sketch showing the proposed fenced area on the north property line and a shed to the rear that would house the horses was reviewed by the Planning Commission. Alice and Ted Bolke were present and asked questions about the sheltering of horses and also the storage of numer- ous older cars on the east area of the property. Mrs. Nall stated the plan 5 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Eighteen PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION/CARRIAGE HILLS HOUSING REVENUE BOND E. Request for Preliminary Resolution to Consider $6,000,000 Multi -Family Housing Development Revenue Bond Issue/Carriage Hills Apartment Project -- The City has received an application from Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. on behalf of Tomark Development Company to sell $6,000,000 of Multi -Family Housing Deveicpment Revenue Bonds. Housing revenue bonds are excluded tr from the current federal moritorium on the use of industrial revenue financing. Tomark Development Company has land use and zoning approvals for the expansion of the Carriage Hills Condominium Development Project. Therefore, consideration of a multi -family housing development revenue bond is in order for consideration by the City. Procedure for handling multi- family development housing development revenue bond 'applications is the same as industrial revenue financing regulations. The first action is to establish a public hearing to consider the preliminary resolution (inducement resolution) which could be at the March 6, 1984, City Council meeting. For additional information on this item, refer to a letter prepared by Miller & Schroeder Municipals Inc. and various attachments including a letter from Miller & Schroeder to Tomark Development Company that provide background on this revenue bond request. Copies • of this information are enclosed on pages //9 through 12t • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a public hearing to consider a preliminary resolution for multi- family housing development revenue bond issue for Carriage Hills Apartment project in the amount of $6,000,000 at the March ®,lb 1984, City Council meeting. 117 Toll Free Minnesota (600) 862-6002 JAN 1 `� 10,84Toll Free Other States (800) 328-6122 • Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 • (612) 831-1500 January 12, 1984 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan, Minnesota 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: $6,000,000 City of Eagan, Minnesota Multifamily Housing Development Revenue Bonds (Carriage Hills Apartments Project) • Dear Mr. Hedges: Enclosed please find a copy of the engagement letter between Tomark Development Company and Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. This letter sets forth a bilatteral commitment between the parties involved, incorporating a promise to cover all costs incurred by the City with respect to the bond issue. The developer is aware that the City is considering a small fee to be paid to the City at the time a Preliminary Inducement Resolution is received. As we discussed in our meeting last Wednesday, Miller & Schroeder is pleased to work in conjunction with the City of Eagan in the development of a multifamily housing program. The existing 462C Bond Plan encompasses only single family housing, and would have to be amended to include multifamily housing. We will work with you and the City staff in the preparation of documents for a submission to the Metropolitan Council for an Eagan 462C Bond Plan Amendment. In addition, Miller & Schroeder will prepare the City's submission to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for approval of the Housing Program pursuant to the Plan. • I have attached a drawing of the Carriage Hills Condominium development as it exists, including the proposed three additional buildings. It is Tomark Development Company's intent to complete the sale of units in the present buildings S Headquarters: Minneapolis, Minnesota Branch OfficesDorntorn Minneapolis • Solaoa Beach, California • Northbrook, Illinois • SL Paul. Minnesota • Naples, Florida • Carson City, Nevada Mem a me Se .nbes lm . Raccoon Caporation • Mr. Thomas Hedges January 12, 1983 Page Two (orange) and then develop two of the remaining three buildings you see on the drawing (yellow). The South building would be 72 units, while the North building would be 78 units. The remaining building (pink) would be developed at some point in the future, depending on market conditions for rental units versus condominiums. We would propose to be at the market with bonds by late spring or early summer in order to take advantage of a more attractive interest rate in the first half of 1984. This would mean City Council approval of the Bond Plan Amendment as well as a Preliminary Inducement Resolution for Tomark at the March 20 meeting. This would require the Council to adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing on February 7. A thirty day publication period is required by Minnesota Statute, Chapter 462C, for the Plan Amendment. A fifteen day period is required for the Housing Program. The notice could incorporate both a Plan and Program. • Your prompt response to our proposal would be most appreciated, as Tomark Development Company has much preparation ahead of them to meet a spring deadline. As a reminder to the City, this bond issue will not be a general obligation of Eagan. A deposit institution will be the obligator on the bond and, with the pledging of its collateral, would achieve a "AAA" rating for the bonds. If you have any additional questions, or if I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to give me a call. Very truly yours, Marcia A. Cohodes underwriter MAC /pmh Enclosures • 119 The Condominiums Of Ic r ('4N cr — It Carriage HTfis U� Golf Course C, 0 O Cc) 0 9) Yank** Doodle fted Toll Free Minnesota (800) 662.6002 _ Toll Free Other States (800) 3286122 '1 r1 U Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Minneapolis. Minnesota 55431 • (612) 831.1500 January 11, 1984 Mr. Mark Ravich Tomark Development Company 7322 Ohms Lane Edina, Minnesota 55435 Re: $6,000,000 City of Eagan, Minnesota Multifamily Housing Development Revenue Bonds (Carraige Hills Apartments Project) Dear Mr. Ravich: Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. ("Miller & Schroeder") wishes to confirm its understanding with Tomark Development Company (the "Corporation") concerning the proposed underwriting of $6,000,000 Multifamily Housing Develop- ment Revenue Bonds ("the Bonds") for the purpose of constructing approximately one hundred fifty (150) market rate residential units located in the Carriage Hills development area. Miller do Schroeder will utilize its experienced staff of financial specialists as a resource in structuring and marketing the Bonds. Our staff will make an analysis of the structure of the offering and will evaluate the potential market, including price levels, for the distribution of the Bonds. Scope of Miller h Schroeder's Services Miller do Schroeder agrees to provide the following services in connection with the proposed financing: A. Miller do Schroeder's responsibilities in connection with the devel- opment of the proposed financing will include: (1) working in conjunction others in an analysis to legal requirements to designed to accomplish) with you, your counsel and the necessary financial and develop a financial program our purpose; (2) preparing any necessary mathematical computations with respect to the Bonds and making those computa- tions available to your, your2co1unsel and others; Headquarters: Minneapolis. Branch Offices: Dowraown Minneapolis • Solaria Beach. California • Northbrook. Illinois • SL Paul, Minnesota • Naples, Florida • Carson City. Nevada MemM1ry of rM $fcunlrn Ime.rry AOIrtUon COrpwelwn 0 Mr. Mark R'avich January 11, 1984 Page Two (3) submitting to you a Bond Purchase Agreement be- tween you and Miller h Schroeder to review by your counsel and execution by the appropriate parties. (4) arrange, coordinate and attend meetings with Standard do Poor's Corporation as are appropriate and furnish all required information to such rating agency. B. Miller do Schroeder's responsibilities in connection with the imple- mentation of the financing plan and the underwriting and distrib- ution of the Bonds will include: (l) analyzing for your review the types, amounts and size of the Bonds to be issued and the estimated prices of the Bonds, all based on then current market condi- tions; (2) making recommendations relating to the timing and • implementation of all phases of the financing; (3) advising and assisting you in connection with the preparation of necessary documents relating to the issuance of the Bonds, including those documents re- quired to be filed with any federal or state regulatory agency; (4) coordinating with your staff and counsel, and others, the preparation of the Official Statement relating to the Bonds; (5) distributing the Official statement to potential pur- chasers; (6) performing all other necessary services required to accomplish the financing as requested by the Company to assure the successful issuance of the Bonds. Corporation's Responsibilities The Corporation's responsibilities in connection with the issuance of the Bonds will include: • A. Making available to Miller & Schroeder such data and reports that you have or may hereafter develop pertaining to the financing plan or any phase thereof. Miller do Schroeder may rely upon any such written data and reports furnished by you in the preparation ILL 0 • • Mr. Mark Ravich January ll, 1984 Page Three of the financing of any phase thereof under this Agreement. You further agree to co-operate with Miller do Schroeder in making your management available for such conferences and consulta- tions as may be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement. B. Not incurring any expenses that will be the responsibility of Miller do Schroeder without first receiving written consent from Miller do Schroeder. Payment of Costs and Expenses All, costs and expenses incident to the execution and performance of this Agreement and to the sale and delivery of the Bonds including, but not limited to: (i) the fees and expenses of the Issuer's counsel; (ii) the fees and expenses of the Company's counsel and accountants; (iii) the fees and expenses of Bond Counsel, and counsel to the Underwriter; (iv) all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the preparation and printing of the Official Statement (Private Placement Memorandum); (v) all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the prepara- tion and printing of the Bonds; and NO all expenses (including fees and disburse- ments of counsel) incurred in connection with the qualification of the Bonds for sale and determination of the eligibility for investment under the laws of such jurisdiction as. Miller do Schroeder may designate and preparation of Blue Sky and Legal Investment Memoranda, shall be payable by the Company, irrespective of whether the Bonds are issued. + It is agreed that the fee charged by Miller do Schroeder for underwriting and selling the bonds will be an amount equal to three percent (3%) of the loan amount. Our underwriting fee will be due and payable at the closing of this transaction.** you further agree to pay Miller do Schroeder a fee of $5,000 if you use the inducement resolution and not utilize Miller do Schroeder as underwriter. This fee is payable ffi�oxcocclosing. + Howev Mille s Schr r shall et your authorization before camai.ttinv Your iompany to any o Mese expenses. •• If Miller s Schr°d dos t u derwr to Communications �l27fer ed scYiroe'�er. ?}ow All notices, requests, demands required hereunder shall be in writing if delivered or mailed, postage prepaid and sell the bonds no fee will be due ever, and other communications permitted or and shall be deemed to have been duly given to the following address: If to: Ms. Marcia A. Cohodes Miller do Schroeder Municipals, Inc. 2300 Northwestern Financial Center 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 If to: Mr. Mark Ravich Tomark Development Company 7322 Ohms Lane Edina, Minnesota 55.435 113 • Mr. Mark Ravich January 11, 1984 Page Four 0 Duration and Termination This Agreement shall remain in effect until December 31, 1984 or until the Bonds have been issued, whichever is earlier. This Agreement may be extended by written agreement between both parties. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the succesors-in- interest of each of the parties hereto, but shall not be assignable by either party without the express written consent of the other party to this Agreement. Upon your execution of acceptance below, this letter shall constitute an agreement between you and Miller do Schroeder. MILLER do SCHROEDER MUNICIPALS, INC. By W12.1e4q,'j re Its "Ifyli1lnit dwliLFh1Le- Accepted this _ _ l J day of Jl(41 WA -Y 1984. TOMARK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 0r'/JN,< f �,<. 'Cr By Its Q<�J 1" Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Nineteen SPECIAL PERMIT/JAMES B. HORNE FOR SEMI -TRAILER F. James B. Horne for a Special Permit to Allow a Semi -Trailer to be used for Storage at 3850 Coronation Road -- Mr. James Horne has made an application for a special permit to allow a semi -trailer to be used for storage on his property located adjacent to Pilot Knob Road and Coronation Road. Mr. Horne's mail order business is expanding and additional storage is required if the business is to be continued on his property. For additional information on this. item, refer to the City Planner's report, a copy is enclosed on page(s) 1140 -kQ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special permit request by' James B. Horne to allow a semi -trailer to be used for storage at 3850 Coronation Road. 1aS • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT FOR PARKING OF A SEMI -TRAILER FOR STORAGE APPLICANT: JAMES B. HORNE, HORNE DEVELOPMENT CO. LOCATION: 3850 CORONATION ROAD IN PART OF THE NE; OF THE NE4 OF SECTION 21 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 7, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 3, 1984 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a special permit in order to park a semi -trailer to be used for stor- age located at 3850 Coronation Road in part of the NEh of the NE; of Section 21. �ji7ufu�� 1�1T.� Mr. Horne has contacted the City and is requesting that he be allow- ed to place a semi -trailer on his property which in turn would be used for storage of books in regard to his mail-order business for aircraft literature and publications located at 3850 Coronation Road. Mr. Horne has indicated that the volume of business which he is pre- sently conducting has created a shortage of storage space for his per- iodicals and books which people are requesting from the mail-order catalog he distributes. Therefore, Mr. Horne has requested that the City allow him to park a trailer on his property where he can store books until they are distributed to his mail-order business. In review of this particular location, Mr. Horne has submitted a site plan showing the proposed location of the trailer in relationship to his home and existing roadway. It appears that the closest neighbor is approximately 3001, or a block away, from the proposed location. This is why Mr. Horne is requesting that he be allowed to park a trail- er for storage on his property. Staff has discussed with him the possibilities of rental space in other locations of the City and other alternatives other than parking a trailer on the property. Mr. Horne has indicated that erecting an additional building on the property or storage off the property would be prohibitive for this type of storage at the present time. He would like to use the trailer as a temporary measure to determine if the business is going to keep up this type of volume, and if so, would then relocate or request the zoning change where the business would • be compatible with the type of zoning the City requires. If approved, the special permit should be subject to the following conditions: X1(0 CITY OF EAGAN SPECIAL PERMIT - JAMES B. HORNE FEBRUARY 7, 1984 PAGE TWO 1) A one-year time frame be placed on this special permit. 2) The trailer should be in a location where it will be screened from the existing residents. 3) There be no other type of storage facilities allowed on this. property. 4) All other ordinances shall be adhered to. DCR/jach ►a7 • is • $,el I / I di Pli m ENTIOPP"73AM 0 fj 0 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Twenty 11 • SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE/EAGAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY G. Michael C. 8 Joan M. Gresser, Eagan Construction Company, Inc. for a 4.4 Foot Side Setback Variance in an I-1 District Located in Sibley Terminal Industrial Park -- It was discovered by the Building Inspection Department that a side setback variance would be required for the Michael Gresser project that was recently approved for platting and industrial revenue financing on Lot 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park in the northwest corner of Yankee Doodle Drive and Terminal Drive. For additional information on this item, refer to the City Planner's report, copies enclosed on page(s) 131 — 1 3 S ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the side setback variance as requested by Mr. Gresser representing Eagan Construction Company. i 3 L CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: MICHAEL C & JOAN M GRESSER, EAGAN CONSTRUC- TION CO. LOCATION: LOT 11, BLOCK 1, SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARK IN SECTION 8 EXISTING ZONING: I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 7, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 2, 1984 REPORTED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted request- ing approximately a 9 foot side setback variance from Lot 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. COMMENTS Mr. Gresser has submitted a..site plan to the City for a building per- mit for a new office -warehouse facility. In this particular plan, • the applicant met all of the City's requirements except that the side setback proposed was 15'� feet and the ordinance for an I-1 District requires a 20' side setback. In this process, the applicant thought he had met all of the criteria and started to construct footings for this particular building. When the Building Department reviewed the building plan, they noticed that the building did not meet the side setback requirement of 20 feet. Therefore, a variance is being re- quested. In review of the detailed plan, it appears that the applicant has met all of the other criteria for an industrial building with the excep- tion of this variance. In looking to the property adjacent this lot, it is vacant and owned by E. L. Murphy. It appears that this 5 -foot variance would not cause a problem at this particular time for site distance or spacing between buildings. In, review of the entire plan, the new building would contain 29,964 square feet and total building coverage would be approximately 258. The applicant is proposing the parking around the sides of the build- ing, and in the future, hopefully will be proposing to vacate -a por- tion of Yankee Doodle Road north of Terminal Drive and turn it into a private street where a landscaping and a nice entrance could be constructed to this facility. In addition, it appears that the lot line is a little askew and the variance on the front portion (or the area toward Terminal Drive) is . approximately 155 feet, and as you -get north of the property toward 131 CITY OF EAGAN MICHAEL C GRESSER, EAGAN CONSTRUCTION - VARIANCE • FEBRUARY 7,, 1984. PAGE TWO the back of the building, the variance is less than 5 feet. If approved, the variance should.be subject to the following condi- tions: 1) All other applicable ordinances shall be adhered to. DCR/jach • • 131 • ,� 4r� ._ (755"S9'.._��♦ wee ._' CG \ D E 9 �'`�, C �P �tiP b I �Aa �r I .n i • �1 .....i1.'I��iir'nJ�JISQt•L�:�1Ft`'G�YIe�lli�''�:l.yr�a � ,,..:d1::'.ru�f'i:r'; :�i�4..�' D 2w NJ 1 / : I WZ IVO / 10 a O� PART OFF OUTLOT A OHO i. .6u AL µ ` I kl.. A. L31 n n + -r - UN CLUB ~� -�, - / PO - LAKE- hh I. EHNDE L 1 Ll ��n•� MEADO r. PARC A L Isr ADD CO;MSERV tam Vmo■ �pll�,.lnW�i.■..■..■� I L61_ No a R-4 R-4 PK r, FOXwmi RIDGE ' N,uzB N B 64 --- 8UBJEC _ mfm .6u AL µ ` I kl.. A. L31 n n + -r - UN CLUB ~� -�, - / PO - LAKE- hh I. EHNDE L 1 Ll ��n•� MEADO r. PARC A L Isr ADD CO;MSERV tam Vmo■ �pll�,.lnW�i.■..■..■� I No a R-4 R-4 PK r, FOXwmi RIDGE ' N,uzB N B Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -One FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/KENSINGTON PLACE A. Final Plat Approval, Kensington Place (Tomark Development) -- The Public Works Director has received a request from the developer to continue consideration of this final plat approval until a later date. The developer was not able to meet the deadline for final plat application for those items relating to the financial guarantee. While it is anticipated that they .:iii be requesting final plat approval at the February 21 meeting, they have requested an indefinite continuance. • • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue final plat consideration for Kensington Place to a later date. 13(a Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two CONTRACT 84-2/WESCOTT ROAD TRUNK SANITARY SEWER B. Contract 84-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Wescott Road Trunk Sanitary Sewer) -- On October 5, 1982, the public hearing was closed and Project 361 was approved which provided for the installation of trunk sanitary sewer to Lexington Avenue by Wescott Road. Preparation of detailed plans and specifi- cations were authorized subject to conclusion of acquisition of easements or a guarantee for all costs to be incurred to be the responsibility of the developer(s). At the December 6, 1983, council meeting, the Cit: Council approved an agreement whereby Lexington South Incorporated would accept all costs associated with the easement acquisition up to a maximum of $60,000. Subsequently, detailed plans and specifications have now been completed and are being presented to the City Council for a review along with a request for authorization to advertise for a bid opening to be held on March 2. Our consulting engineer, Mr. Bob Rosene, and the Public Works Director will be available to discuss the details of these plans with the Council if there are any specific questions. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans and specifications for Contract 84-2 and advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 9:30 A March 2, 1984. 137 the detailed authorize the .M. on Friday, • • • Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -Three ACT 84-5/FIRE ADMINISTRATION PARKING LOT C. Contract 84-5, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Fire Administration Parking Lot) -- As a part of the new Municipal Center bond referendum, the old City Hall was to be renovated to provide for the new Fire Administration and Divine Redeemer ambulance services. As a part of this renovation, it was found desirable to upgrade the parking lot to City standards through a separate City contract. Subsequently, the Engineering Division has designed a new parking lot layout and prepared detailed specifications for the solicitation of bids. The Public Works Director will present these plans for the Council's review and will respond to any specific questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans and specifications for Contract 84-5 and authorize the advertisement for the bid opening to be held at 10:30 A.M. on Thursday, March 1, 1984. CONTRACT 83-09/CEDAR GROVE 1ST 8 2ND ADDITIONS D. Contract 83-09, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Grove 1st and 2nd Additions - Street Reconstruction) -- We have received • a request for the sixth and final payment to Contract 83-09 which provided for the street reconstruction/rehabilitation of Cedar Grove 1st and 2nd Additions. This request for final payment is processed through our consulting engineering firm along with a recommendation and certification that the project was completed in accordance with City approved plans and specifica- tions. While the final contract amount exceeded the bid proposal by 1.58 ($10,313) due to an overrun in driveway and boulevard restoration materials, the final contract amount was 5.48 ($40,212) below the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on February 1, 1983. Any corrective work remaining to be performed will be adequately covered under the warranty provisions of this contract. E Therefore, the Public Works Director is recommending that the City Council formally approve the sixth and final payment and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. It is anticipated that this final assessment hearing will be held during the next three-four months. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the sixth and final payment for Contract 83-09 for $4,100 to McNamara - Vivant Construction Inc. and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. 13$ Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four r - HRA MEETING A. HRA Meeting to Review School District 197 and Dakota County Responses to the Tax Increment Financing Plan and HRA Supplemental Agreement -- Procedurally the City Council will need to suspend the regular City Council meeting and meet formally as an HRA authority to act on the following agenda items: 1. Report on Dakota County and Independent School District. 197 action regarding the tax increment financing plan for redevelopment district #1. 2. Consider the adoption of a resolution approving formation of tax increment district pursuant to redevelopment plan and tax increment financing plan for redevelopment district #1. 3. Consider supplemental cooperation agreement between the Dakota County HRA and City of Eagan. 4. The Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Program. The HRA Executive Director /City Administrator Hedges will present all three items for HRA Board approval. The first item listed • above regarding a report on the action by Dakota County and Independent School District 197 consists of a letter and unanimous County Board approval supporting the City of Eagan's tax increment financing plan. A copy of that letter and action is enclosed on pages 140 through I4-1 _ The City has received no response from Independent School District 197 regarding the tax increment financing plan. The County Board and school district notification does not require any formal action by the HRA Board. A resolution has been prepared by the City's bond counsel entitled "Resolution Approving Formation of Tax Increment District Pursuant to Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevel- opment District 41". A copy of that resolution is enclosed on pages 14r2,through 14T for HRA Board consideration. Action is to be considered on the approval of this resolution which provides all the conditions for considering the redevelopment plan and tax increment financing plan. Recently the City Council approved a cooperation agreement with the Dakota County HRA to qualify the City of Eagan for the Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Program. Due to the fact the City has an HRA, the Dakota County HRA must request a supplemental cooperation agreement from the City's HRA as a procedural matter to further qualify for the Entitlement CDBG Program. This action is procedural and regarding as a function • of the HRA. A copy of that letter and agreement is enclosed on pages 146 through 14!j for City Council review. 139 Agenda Information Memo February 7, 1984 City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -Five • Following actions by the HRA, the official Housing Redevelopment Authority meeting would then adjourn and the City Council can resume the regular City Council meeting for additional business. 139 0. • 1 DAKOTA COUNTY 1 •DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 HWY. 33 - HASTINGS. MINNESOTA 55033 • • January 23, 1984 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City of Eagan City Hall 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Sir: JAN 2 % ;84 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE 612.437-0416 I am forwarding, for your information, a copy of Resolution No. 84-46 covering action taken by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners relating to the City of Eagan's Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevelopment District #1. S'ncerely, zale_i oan L. Ken all Deputy Administrator JLK:ja Enclosure COMMISSIONERS - 1+0 •O AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER IST DISTRICT2ND DISTRICT 3RD DISTRICT 4TH DISTRICT STH DISTRICT JOSEPH A. HARRIS GERALD E. HOLLENKAMP JOHN S. VOSS STEVEN LOEDING RUSSELL STREEFLAND HASTINGS SOUTH ST. PAUL BURNSVILLE INVER GROVE HEIGHTS BURNSVILLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA Date....Ja nua ry._ 17.,.._1984 Resolution No. ..-,..—..,-- • Motion by Commisaioner...._LOedtng _. H011enkamp„ Seconded by Commissioner. WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has submitted the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevelopment District #1 to Dakota County for review. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That Dakota County acknowledges receipt and review of an outline of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan, and directs the County Administrator to notify the City of this action. E YES NO Harris X Harris Hollenkamp X Hollenkemp Voss X Voss Loading X Loeding Streeflend X Streefland State of Minnesota ss County of Dakota - I. C. D. Onischuk, duly elected. Qualified and acting County Auditor of the County of Dakota. State of Minnesota. do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution with the original minutes of the proceeding of the BoaFeTeof. unty Commissioners, Dakota County, Minnesota, at their • session held on the _/'.7....�_.._....day oL...........19. `�... now on file in my office, and have found the same to be a true and correct copy Witness my hand and official seal at Hastings. Minnesota, this . _. day C*=17 Audtt= Ll • Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eagan, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eagan, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on , the day of 1984, at o'clock, .M. The following Commissioners were present: and the following were absent: Commissioner introduced the following written resolution and moved its adoption: HRA RESOLUTION No. RESOLUTION APPROVING FORMATION OF TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners has approved a Redevelopment Plan and a Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevelopment District No. 1 of the City of Eagan; WHEREAS, the Tax Increment Financing Plan and the Redevelopment Plan have been approved by the City Council of the City of Eagan after a public hearing duly called and held thereon; WHEREAS, an appraisal of the property within the proposed district prepared by J.E. Parranto Associates, Inc. has been submitted to the Authority expressing an opinion as to the • value of the property before and after preparation of the site for redevelopment; 14IL- n L WHEREAS, the Authority has presented to the members of the Dakota County Board of Commissioners and the members of the school board of the school district in which Redevelopment District No. 1 is located its estimate of the fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district and provided an opportunity for such members to meet with the Authority; WHEREAS, 30 days has passed from the date of transmittal by the Authority of the information regarding such fiscal and economic implications and this Board has reviewed the comments submitted by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners; and WHEREAS, -the Authority is authorized to create a tax increment financing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.71 to 273.78, as amended, for the purpose of financ- ing the project described in the Redevelopment Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: 4+ 1. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: • (1) the land in the project area would not be made available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought; (2) the redevelopment plans for the redevelopment areas in the locality will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the locality as a whole, for the redevelopment of such areas by private enterprise; (3) the redevelopment plan conforms to a general plan for the development for the locality as a whole; (4) the proposed tax increment financing district is a redevelopment district in that less than 70 percent of the parcels of property in the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements, but due to hilly terrain conditions requiring substantial filling, grading and other physical preparation for use at least 80 percent of the total acreage of such land has a fair market value upon inclusion in the district which, when added to the estimated cost of preparing that land for development, excluding costs directly related to roads defined in Section 160.01, Minnesota Statutes and local improvements described in Chapters 429 and 430, Minnesota Statutes, exceeds its anticipated • fair market value after completion of -said preparation; 4+ 0 (5) the proposed development or redevelopment would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foresee- able future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary; (6) the tax increment financing plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole; and (7) the tax increment financing plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the project by private enterprise. The reasons and supporting facts for each of the above determina- tions are as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plan, in the appraisal referred to above and in other estimates and reports on file with the City and the Authority. 2. The Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed and there shall be created a redevelopment district and a tax increment financing district as provided therein and the Authority shall undertake the • project described in the Redevelopment Plan through the use of tax increment financing. E 3. The Authority shall request certification of the original assessed valuation of the tax increment district as described in the tax increment financing plan by the County Auditor at such time as the property in the district is selected as the site for a class A horse racing track by the Minnesota Racing Commission and upon completion of a satisfactory develop- ment agreement between the Authority and a developer of the property in the district. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. /44 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) SS. CITY OF EAGAN I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Executive Director of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Eagan, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a meeting of the Board of Commissioners held , 1984 with the original thereof on file and of record in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete • transcript therefrom. • Witness My hand officially and the seal of the Authority this day of , 1984. 45� Executive Director DAKOTA.COUPITY ..:. HRA Serving People and Communities December 22, 1983 Tom Hedges, Administrator/Manager City of Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Tom: DEC 2 7, X983 DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2496- 145th STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612.423-4800 The County Attorney's Office and HUD have determined that a Supplemental Cooperation Agreement needs to be executed between the County and each of the six municipal HRAs that exist in Dakota County to clarify potential activity implementation options and to insure the municipal HRAs' cooperation, as needed, with'the, Entitlement CDBG program. I would appreciate it very much if this action could be taken up at the Eagan • HRA's next Board meeting. The document to be executed, of which I will need three originally signed copies, is attached. I will also need a certified coov of the portion of the minutes authorizing the action. Please let me know if you have any questions on this and/or wish me to be pre- sent at the meeting. I do appreciate all the support Eagan has given this new program. SiSi er Carol Schultz Executive Director CS:lz Attachment • /46 "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" .% h • SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR THE DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of EAGAN Housing and Redevelopment Authority, hereinafter referred to as the "Local HRA". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County and the City of EAGAN hereinafter "City",- have entered into a Joint Cooperation Agreement for the Dakota County Development Block Grant Program (to which this Supplemental Agreement is attached); and WHEREAS, the Local HRA is a duly organized municipal housing and redevelopment authority pursuant to Minn. Stat. • §462.411, et. seq.; and WHEREAS, the County and the Local HRA wish to clarify their relationship in light of the aforementioned Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and County. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. The Local HRA acknowledges and agrees to be bound by all terms and conditions of the aforementioned Joint Cooperation Agreement between the County and the City insofar as it relates to the duties, responsibilities and obligations of the Local HRA under Minn. Stat. §462.411, et. seq. • Page 1 of 3 /47 -. ~ • 2. The County through the Dakota County HRA, its administrative agent for purposes of receipt and distribution of Community Development Block Grant Funds, agrees to cooperate with the Local HRA and coordinate expenditure of any Community Development Block Grant Funds which are expended within the City to the extent necessary to accomplish specified project objectives. 3. The Local HRA agrees to allow expenditure of Community Development Block Grant Funds received by the County pursuant to the aforementioned Joint Cooperation Agreement and this Supplemental Agreement within the City and agrees to cooperate with the County and/or the Dakota County HRA to the extent necessary to accomplish specified project objectives. • This cooperation shall include: (1) execution of an Administrative Services Contract with the Dakota County HRA and/or the County whereby the Local HRA agrees to assume all obligations of the Dakota County HRA under its Administrative Services Agreement with the County for purposes of the Community Development Block Grant Program if said Local HRA desires to administer expenditure of such funds within the City; or Page 2 of 3 W - 1TZ n U (2) passing a resolution by its governing body authorizing the Dakota County HRA to act as the County's administrative agent for purposes of expenditure of Community Development Block Grant Funds within the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed. Approved ajs, t((o?? form: %`\•Ct.lhtf,l. C L7:f'�/..;I>ii1,• 12-I'J�b AA�tant County Attorney Date Approved as to execution: Assistant County Attorney Date Approved by Dakota County Board Resolution No. This instrument drafted by: JCB COUNTY OF DAKOTA STATE OF MINNESOTA By Russell L. Streefland, Chairman Board of Commissioners Date of Signature Attest Carl D. Onischuk, Auditor Date of Signature Dakota County Attorney's Office Dakota County Government Center 1560 Highway 55 CITY OF EAGAN Hastings, Minnesota 55033 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Telephone: (612) 437-0438 • C-83-587 by/m By Its Date of Signature By its Date of Signature Page 3 of 3 Ibt9