Loading...
05/29/1984 - City Council Regular0 0 • MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA MAY 29, 1984 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on May 29, 1984 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Those pressent were Chairman Hall, Members Krob, Wold, McCrea, and Roy Taylor, Jr. Absent were Bohne, Mulrooney and Wilkins. Also present were Assistant City Engineer Hefti, City Planner Runkle, Assistant City Planner Ingraham, and City Attorney Hauge. , AGENDA Chairman Hall announced that the two applications of Mr. and Mrs. Alan Draenckhahn would be heard at the same time consisting of the rezoning appli- cation -and preliminary plat application approval, and further, that a special meeting will be discussed concerning the request of Martin and Vernon Colon - for consideration of the revised Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition. Regular Meeting of April 24, 1984 - McCrea moved, Kroh seconded the • motion to approve the Minutes. All voted in favor. ALAN DRENCKRABN - REZONING 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearings regarding the application of Alan J. Drenckhahn and Baerbel Drenckhahn for rezoning from A (Agricultural) to RB (Roadside Busi- ness) and for preliminary plat approval of approximately 0.68 acres in part of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 4 on the west side of Pilot Knob Road was convened by Chairman Hall. Dale Runkle, City Planner, detailed the two applications, noting that the property is zoned Agricultural and the Comprehensive Guide designates the parcel as RB (Roadside Business District). The proposal by the applicants is to remodel the 1,354 square foot structure into a gift shop and hair salon with possible restaurant to be constructed in the future. The main issue concerned whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the RB designation, noting the land north of the parcel was intended to be purchased by the applicants. Mr. & Mrs. Drenckhahn were present and ques- tions were raised by Planning Commission members, including whether the real estate tax value would increase because of the preliminary plat versus a waiver of plat. The proposal by the Drenckhahns at the present was to apply for waiver. of plat, rather than the final plat, noting that the parcel is intended to be expanded in the future. Mr. Runkle stated that the plat could be required at the time the restaurant is applied for. Member Wold was concerned about the RB zoning for gift shop and hair salon, noting that it may • not be appropriate in RB zoned areas, according to the Ordinance. There were no objections from neighboring property owners and the Drenckhahns indicated they did not expect signage would be necessary along Pilot Knob Road. 1 0 0 • APC Minutes May 29, 1984 The planning commission members generally felt the application was prema- ture for platting because a.curb cut may not be appropriate if the service road is extended in the future. After considerable discussion, Hall moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend rezoning to RB on a conditional basis for the two uses, including hair salon and gift shop as applied for by the applicant for a maximum period of three years with the understanding that no expansion of the present use or building would be permitted during that period of time; further, that at the end of the three year period, that the applicant must then apply for and acquire approval of an application for preliminary plat approval or the conditional zoning would cease and the uses would then terminate; further, it was recommended that the Planning Commission and Council extend the time in the event that adequate hardship is shown. All voted in favor. Hall then moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of an application for waiver of plat, subject to the following condi- tions: 1. That the waiver will be permitted for a maximum of three years • unless hardship is shown and extended by the City Council. 2. The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review since it abuts a county road. 3. The plan shall be submitted to the City Engineering Department for approval of the drainage and grading alterations. 4. An appropriate bond shall be obtained to insure conformance with the landscaping plan. 5. All other City ordinances shall be adhered to. 6. A detailed grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for approval by staff. 7. A 50 foot public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob Road, in addition to further easement if service road is required, along with easements as referenced in this report. 8. This development shall be responsible for trunk water and storm sewer area assessments and lateral benefit from trunk watermain at the rates in effect at final platting. All voted in favor. • 2 • APC Minutes May 29, 1984 0 0 BIRCH PARK ADDITION - PRELDUNARY PLAT The continued public hearing regarding the application of Sienna Corpora- tion for approval of the revised preliminary plat of Birch Park Addition consisting of outlots A, B, C, D, E and F in Windcrest 2nd Addition was convened by Chairman Chuck Hall. Dale Runkle reviewed the application in some detail, including the issues that were raised at the last Advisory Planning Commission meeting. They included access points to Deerwood Drive, the need for a storm sewer outlet to the east and the elimination of Fawn Ridge Drive to give access to the west. Mr. Runkle stated that the number of lots proposed along the westerly portion of Deerwood Drive has been reduced from 8 to 4 lots. A number of neighboring property owners appeared, some of whom objected and others who had questions, particularly concerning the small lot bordering Deerwood on the East end. They objected to small lots where estate sized lots generally existed in the area. Tom Bergen was concerned about the incline to the north into the lots fronting on Deerwood Drive and also was concerned about small lots on the east. Rod Hardy was present for the applicant and stated that the location of access to Deerwood Drive would depend on the future upgrading of Deerwood Drive and recommended that the exact location be determined at such time. Mr. Runkle stated that possibly the City could consider one access for each two lots on to Deerwood Drive if the terrain requires or permits. Mr. Hardy stated that all lots meet the minimum lot width at setback and minimum lot size. There were also concerns about the property on the south side being assessed for Deerwood Drive improvements and whether the developer would pay for all assessments. There was a question as to what provisions the planned development agreement includes concerning the assessments and the staff was requested to research the issue. Krob moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for 73 dwelling units with the following conditions: 1. A revised planned development agreement shall be drafted incorpor- ating the proposed land use changes and possibly an underlying zoning of R-1 be incorporated on this preliminary plat portion. 2. An agreement shall be entered into by the City and developer that if Fawn Ridge Drive is eliminated, that proper access be provided to the west according to City requirements. 3. The planned development shall incorporate this specific plan for lot size and lot configuration. 3 0 • APC Minutes May 29, 1984 0 4. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review and com- ments regarding park dedication. 5. Adequate rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff. 6. All other City ordinances shall be adhered to. 7.The City will require a petition to construct the proposed storm sewer lift station No. 12 and outlet for Pond JP -6. 8. The City will require a petition to construct the proposed 12 inch watermain through this plat. 9. The City will require a petition for the upgrading of Deerwood Drive. 10. Utility and drainage easements shall be dedicated as referenced in • this report. 11. If the utilities and streets are constructed under a private con- tract, the plans and specifications shall be prepared by a registered engineer in accordance with the engineering guidelines; otherwise, the developer shall petition the City to construct the necessary utilities and streets. 12. All future costs for public improvements shall be the sole responsi- bility of the developer except for the watermain oversizing and one-half the appropriate cost of Deerwood Drive unless the developer has agreed by earlier agreement. 13. Accesses to Deerwood Drive shall be approved by the City Engineering Department. 14. The developer shall be responsible for the acquisition of necessary easements across the McCarthy property to the east for the necessary storm water control within Birch Park Addition. 15. The developer shall review and maintain architectural controls on lots that are below minimum standards. All voted yes. C� • APC Minutes May 29, 1984 0 0 PILOT POINTE - PRELIMINARY PLAT The next hearing concerned the application of Sienna Corporation for preliminary plat approval of the proposed Pilot Pointe Addition consisting of 8.8 acres on the east side of Pilot Knob Road and proposed to include 20 single family lots. Dale Runkle indicated that the property is zoned R-1 and the lots would all meet minimum width and area requirements. Access is pro- posed to be Pilot Knob Road 915 feet north of the centerline of Deerwood Drive and the circulation would be on a proposed cul-de-sac sub -street to provide future access to properties on the north. No access was proposed to the parcel to the south of the project. The applicant would utilize roughly 250,000 cubic yards of fill from the I -35E construction project to raise particularly the center portion of the property which would provide for a 6% grade running easterly from Pilot Knob Road. The applicant is also requesting a 10 foot variance from the 50 foot required setback of Pilot Knob Road for future house construction. A number of neighboring property owners appeared and had questions and some objections, particularly as to the access road and the proposed fill. It was noted that the rear of the lots are intended to • provide for the drainage with a 3 to 1 slope to match existing grades at the rear of each lot. There were objections to any connection to Rocky Lane to the north, but it was noted an access point will be provided and would be utilized only if the lots to the north are resubdivided in the future. The City Engineer recommended moving the access road farther east because of the excessive fill required if it would run between Lots 2 and 3, Skovdale No. 2. After considerable discussion, Wold moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. A 10 foot setback variance shall be granted for Lot 1, Block 1. 2. The plat shall be subject to the County,Plat Commission's review since it abuts a County Road. 3. All other applicable ordinances shall be adhered to. 4. The necessary storm drainage system shall be constructed prior to final plat approval and assure outlets to the proposed Birch Park Addition pond outlet. 5. The City will require that the water main be looped from the east end of proposed Pilot Knob Court to the east plat line and extend to the south to connect to the existing 12 inch water main in Deerwood Drive. 6. The developer will be responsible to construct the sanitary sewer to • the lift station presently being constructed in the proposed Birch Park development. q, E 0 • APC Minutes May 29, 1984 7. The City will require utility and drainage easements ten feet in width adjoining all streets and five feet in width adjoining side and rear lot lines. The City will require easements for all utilities not constructed within the street right-of-way. 8. The developer shall..submit an erosion and sediment control plan to the City for review and approval. All voted in favor. SPECIAL. MEETING - CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL ADDITION A request has been received from the developers of the proposed Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition for a special meeting of the Planning Commission, prior to the Council meeting of June 19, 1984 to consider some revisions to the commercial plat. After discussion, it was noted that the Planning Commis- sion memb?rs could not meet at a time that would allow proper nrw-mpaper notification prior to June 26, 1984. • ADJOURiGNT • Upon motion duly made and seconded, the meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. All voted in favor. R Secretary /p�1 PHH 0 0 • MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA MAY 29, 1984 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on May 29, 1984 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Those pressent were Chairman Hall, Members Krob, Wold, McCrea, and Roy Taylor, Jr. Absent were Bohne, Mulrooney and Wilkins. Also present were Assistant City Engineer Hefti, City Planner Runkle, Assistant City Planner Ingraham, and City Attorney Hauge. , AGENDA Chairman Hall announced that the two applications of Mr. and Mrs. Alan Draenckhahn would be heard at the same time consisting of the rezoning appli- cation -and preliminary plat application approval, and further, that a special meeting will be discussed concerning the request of Martin and Vernon Colon - for consideration of the revised Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition. Regular Meeting of April 24, 1984 - McCrea moved, Kroh seconded the • motion to approve the Minutes. All voted in favor. ALAN DRENCKRABN - REZONING 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearings regarding the application of Alan J. Drenckhahn and Baerbel Drenckhahn for rezoning from A (Agricultural) to RB (Roadside Busi- ness) and for preliminary plat approval of approximately 0.68 acres in part of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 4 on the west side of Pilot Knob Road was convened by Chairman Hall. Dale Runkle, City Planner, detailed the two applications, noting that the property is zoned Agricultural and the Comprehensive Guide designates the parcel as RB (Roadside Business District). The proposal by the applicants is to remodel the 1,354 square foot structure into a gift shop and hair salon with possible restaurant to be constructed in the future. The main issue concerned whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the RB designation, noting the land north of the parcel was intended to be purchased by the applicants. Mr. & Mrs. Drenckhahn were present and ques- tions were raised by Planning Commission members, including whether the real estate tax value would increase because of the preliminary plat versus a waiver of plat. The proposal by the Drenckhahns at the present was to apply for waiver. of plat, rather than the final plat, noting that the parcel is intended to be expanded in the future. Mr. Runkle stated that the plat could be required at the time the restaurant is applied for. Member Wold was concerned about the RB zoning for gift shop and hair salon, noting that it may • not be appropriate in RB zoned areas, according to the Ordinance. There were no objections from neighboring property owners and the Drenckhahns indicated they did not expect signage would be necessary along Pilot Knob Road. 1 0 0 • APC Minutes May 29, 1984 The planning commission members generally felt the application was prema- ture for platting because a.curb cut may not be appropriate if the service road is extended in the future. After considerable discussion, Hall moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend rezoning to RB on a conditional basis for the two uses, including hair salon and gift shop as applied for by the applicant for a maximum period of three years with the understanding that no expansion of the present use or building would be permitted during that period of time; further, that at the end of the three year period, that the applicant must then apply for and acquire approval of an application for preliminary plat approval or the conditional zoning would cease and the uses would then terminate; further, it was recommended that the Planning Commission and Council extend the time in the event that adequate hardship is shown. All voted in favor. Hall then moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of an application for waiver of plat, subject to the following condi- tions: 1. That the waiver will be permitted for a maximum of three years • unless hardship is shown and extended by the City Council. 2. The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review since it abuts a county road. 3. The plan shall be submitted to the City Engineering Department for approval of the drainage and grading alterations. 4. An appropriate bond shall be obtained to insure conformance with the landscaping plan. 5. All other City ordinances shall be adhered to. 6. A detailed grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for approval by staff. 7. A 50 foot public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob Road, in addition to further easement if service road is required, along with easements as referenced in this report. 8. This development shall be responsible for trunk water and storm sewer area assessments and lateral benefit from trunk watermain at the rates in effect at final platting. All voted in favor. • 2 • APC Minutes May 29, 1984 0 0 BIRCH PARK ADDITION - PRELDUNARY PLAT The continued public hearing regarding the application of Sienna Corpora- tion for approval of the revised preliminary plat of Birch Park Addition consisting of outlots A, B, C, D, E and F in Windcrest 2nd Addition was convened by Chairman Chuck Hall. Dale Runkle reviewed the application in some detail, including the issues that were raised at the last Advisory Planning Commission meeting. They included access points to Deerwood Drive, the need for a storm sewer outlet to the east and the elimination of Fawn Ridge Drive to give access to the west. Mr. Runkle stated that the number of lots proposed along the westerly portion of Deerwood Drive has been reduced from 8 to 4 lots. A number of neighboring property owners appeared, some of whom objected and others who had questions, particularly concerning the small lot bordering Deerwood on the East end. They objected to small lots where estate sized lots generally existed in the area. Tom Bergen was concerned about the incline to the north into the lots fronting on Deerwood Drive and also was concerned about small lots on the east. Rod Hardy was present for the applicant and stated that the location of access to Deerwood Drive would depend on the future upgrading of Deerwood Drive and recommended that the exact location be determined at such time. Mr. Runkle stated that possibly the City could consider one access for each two lots on to Deerwood Drive if the terrain requires or permits. Mr. Hardy stated that all lots meet the minimum lot width at setback and minimum lot size. There were also concerns about the property on the south side being assessed for Deerwood Drive improvements and whether the developer would pay for all assessments. There was a question as to what provisions the planned development agreement includes concerning the assessments and the staff was requested to research the issue. Krob moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for 73 dwelling units with the following conditions: 1. A revised planned development agreement shall be drafted incorpor- ating the proposed land use changes and possibly an underlying zoning of R-1 be incorporated on this preliminary plat portion. 2. An agreement shall be entered into by the City and developer that if Fawn Ridge Drive is eliminated, that proper access be provided to the west according to City requirements. 3. The planned development shall incorporate this specific plan for lot size and lot configuration. 3 0 • APC Minutes May 29, 1984 0 4. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review and com- ments regarding park dedication. 5. Adequate rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff. 6. All other City ordinances shall be adhered to. 7.The City will require a petition to construct the proposed storm sewer lift station No. 12 and outlet for Pond JP -6. 8. The City will require a petition to construct the proposed 12 inch watermain through this plat. 9. The City will require a petition for the upgrading of Deerwood Drive. 10. Utility and drainage easements shall be dedicated as referenced in • this report. 11. If the utilities and streets are constructed under a private con- tract, the plans and specifications shall be prepared by a registered engineer in accordance with the engineering guidelines; otherwise, the developer shall petition the City to construct the necessary utilities and streets. 12. All future costs for public improvements shall be the sole responsi- bility of the developer except for the watermain oversizing and one-half the appropriate cost of Deerwood Drive unless the developer has agreed by earlier agreement. 13. Accesses to Deerwood Drive shall be approved by the City Engineering Department. 14. The developer shall be responsible for the acquisition of necessary easements across the McCarthy property to the east for the necessary storm water control within Birch Park Addition. 15. The developer shall review and maintain architectural controls on lots that are below minimum standards. All voted yes. C� • APC Minutes May 29, 1984 0 0 PILOT POINTE - PRELIMINARY PLAT The next hearing concerned the application of Sienna Corporation for preliminary plat approval of the proposed Pilot Pointe Addition consisting of 8.8 acres on the east side of Pilot Knob Road and proposed to include 20 single family lots. Dale Runkle indicated that the property is zoned R-1 and the lots would all meet minimum width and area requirements. Access is pro- posed to be Pilot Knob Road 915 feet north of the centerline of Deerwood Drive and the circulation would be on a proposed cul-de-sac sub -street to provide future access to properties on the north. No access was proposed to the parcel to the south of the project. The applicant would utilize roughly 250,000 cubic yards of fill from the I -35E construction project to raise particularly the center portion of the property which would provide for a 6% grade running easterly from Pilot Knob Road. The applicant is also requesting a 10 foot variance from the 50 foot required setback of Pilot Knob Road for future house construction. A number of neighboring property owners appeared and had questions and some objections, particularly as to the access road and the proposed fill. It was noted that the rear of the lots are intended to • provide for the drainage with a 3 to 1 slope to match existing grades at the rear of each lot. There were objections to any connection to Rocky Lane to the north, but it was noted an access point will be provided and would be utilized only if the lots to the north are resubdivided in the future. The City Engineer recommended moving the access road farther east because of the excessive fill required if it would run between Lots 2 and 3, Skovdale No. 2. After considerable discussion, Wold moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. A 10 foot setback variance shall be granted for Lot 1, Block 1. 2. The plat shall be subject to the County,Plat Commission's review since it abuts a County Road. 3. All other applicable ordinances shall be adhered to. 4. The necessary storm drainage system shall be constructed prior to final plat approval and assure outlets to the proposed Birch Park Addition pond outlet. 5. The City will require that the water main be looped from the east end of proposed Pilot Knob Court to the east plat line and extend to the south to connect to the existing 12 inch water main in Deerwood Drive. 6. The developer will be responsible to construct the sanitary sewer to • the lift station presently being constructed in the proposed Birch Park development. q, E 0 • APC Minutes May 29, 1984 7. The City will require utility and drainage easements ten feet in width adjoining all streets and five feet in width adjoining side and rear lot lines. The City will require easements for all utilities not constructed within the street right-of-way. 8. The developer shall..submit an erosion and sediment control plan to the City for review and approval. All voted in favor. SPECIAL. MEETING - CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL ADDITION A request has been received from the developers of the proposed Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition for a special meeting of the Planning Commission, prior to the Council meeting of June 19, 1984 to consider some revisions to the commercial plat. After discussion, it was noted that the Planning Commis- sion memb?rs could not meet at a time that would allow proper nrw-mpaper notification prior to June 26, 1984. • ADJOURiGNT • Upon motion duly made and seconded, the meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. All voted in favor. R Secretary /p�1 PHH