No preview available
 /
     
06/05/1984 - City Council RegularPLEASE PRINT Date: June S, L91* NAME J; W1 �p,e L N�PrrfG�'� `V-�, IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK PLEASE SIGN HERE 37so So. l e,e we Tart z�- SDs • C • AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL JUNE 5, 1984 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL 6 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA S APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Fire Department B. Police Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA C. Park S Recreation Department D. Public Works Department p.v A. Contractor Licenses 5 B. Personnel Items G C. Contract 83-13, Final Payment/Acceptance (Park Ridge Addition, et' al) �.(o D. Contract 83-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Treatment Plant Utilities) E. Contract 84-8, Approve Williams Pipeline Encroachment 1 Agreement g F. National Flag Day p.JOG. Resignation of Douglas McNeely/Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Member Pp.11 -H. Contract 83-5, Approve Change order 01 (Water Treatment Plant - Utilities and Streets) F.171- I. Contract 83-5, Change Order o2 (Water Treatment Plant - Streets and Utilities) j3 J. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition) K. Contract 83-1, Change Order 05, Water Treatment Plant (Control Valves) p15 L. Final Plat Application, Century Addition Y 11M. Final Plat Application, Suncliff 2nd Addition f.IyN. Final Plat Application, Holmes Addition rs10. Grading Permit Application, Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd Addition z1 -P. Final Plat P Application, Safari Addition -LiQ. Project 411, Review Request/Authorize Feasibility Report, P Patrick Eagan Park (Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) V. T:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS p 1.5 A. Project 404, Lexington Place South (Streets 6 Utilities) 1 63 B. Project 400, Oak Cliff Pond (Lift Station 6 Force Main Outlet) p,jLC. Project 398, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Streets d Utilities) (Continued from 5-15-84 Meeting) p.91 D. Vacate Utility Easment, Lakeside Estates P.0 E. Vacate Street Easement, Twinview Manor 2nd Addition 1 VI. VII. IR X. RI. OLD.BUSINESS p 95 A. Alan J. 8 Baerbel C. Draenckhahn for Rezoning from A • I (Agricultural District) to RB (Roadside Business District) Consisting of Approximately .68 Acres in Part of the SE1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 4, T -27N, R -23W (Will be continued J to a future City Council meeting) �p}l B. Contract 84-11, Approve Plans 6 Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Oak Cliff Pond) NEW BUSINESS 101 A. Sienna Corporation (Rod Hardy) for Preliminary Plat, Birch P Park Addition, Consisting of Approximately 43 Acres a Containing 77 Dwelling Units in Outlots B, C, D, E and F, Windcrest 2nd Addition P. 110 B. Corporate Construction for Waiver of Plat to Split a Duplex Lot for Individual Ownership, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition, Lot 2, Block 1, in the SW 1/2, Section 25 i 'p.115 C. Suncliff Development Company for a Variance from the Sideyard Setback Along a Public Street, Suncliff 1st Addition, in the NW 1/4 of Section 29 D. NW. Mutual Life Insurance for a Resolution Providing for a Concurrent Detachment and Annexation of Incorporated Land, in the N 1/2 of Section 3 ADDITIONAL ITEMS 133 A. Municipal Center Landscaping • p r3`i B. Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission p13(,C. Contract 84-6, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for p Bids (Sealcoating) 13j D. Contract 84-14, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for P AA Bids (Lexington Place 2nd Addition s Lexington Place South) E. Contract 84-15, Approve Plans/Aurhorize Advertisement for P Bids (SunCliff 2nd Addition) VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) ADJOURNMENT 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 31, 1984 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION MEMO FOR JUNE 5, 1984, CITY COUNCIL MEETING After approval of the May 15, 1984, regular City Council minutes and special City Council meeting minutes for December 22, 1983, January 10, 1984, March 27, 1984 and May 24, 1984, and the agenda for the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting, the following items are in order for consideration. •DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Fire Department -- There are no items to be considered under Fire Department at this time. B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered under Police Department at this time. C. Parks and Recreation Department -- There are ,no items to be considered under Parks and Recreation Department at this time. • D. Public Works Department -- There are no items to be considered under Public Works Department at this time. 1-1 L Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Two There are seventeen (17) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council desires to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the consent agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTORS' LICENSE A. Contractors' License -- The City has received contractor license applications for contractors who do work in the City of Eagan and seven -county metropolitan area. All of these contrac- ors are considered reliable according to the Protective Inspections Department. The necessary documents and fees have been submitted and it is the recommendation of the Chief Building Inspector that the contractors' licenses be approved. Enclosed on pages Swc is a"copy of the list of proposed contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the contractor license list as presented. • • 0 • MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE. PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: www ��` JUNE 1, 1984 RE: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE PER CITY CODE 6.42 The following lists of contractors have been doing work in the City of Eagan, in the seven county metro area, and are considered reliable. They have submitted the necessary documents and fees and I would recommend that they be licensed to be a contractor in the City of Eagan. DP/nlb • J 3 FOR JUNE 5 1984 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: GENERAL CONTRACTORS: 1. Al's Construction 2. Bjorklund Construction Co. 3. Colorcraft Corp. 4• Custom Energy Homes 5. Floodmaster Engineering Corporation 6. Kraus Anderson 7. Michael Construction, Inc. 8• Ordeen Splittstoser Cont., Inc. 9• Mike Rvgh Homes 10. Ken Smith'Remodeling 11, Stinar Corporation 12. Yankee Doodle Associates HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR: 1. Mark Alberty 2. Linda 6 George Myhre HEATING 6 VENTILATING CONTRACTORS: 1. Farmington plumbing d Heating 2. Churchill's Home Heating/Cooling. Inc. SWIMMI� POOLS: 1. Fools, Inc. .'l ry�i'i •I. I.Id �TC'�I �. �. • C� Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1989, City Council Meeting • Page Three PERSONNEL ITEMS B. Personnel Items -- The following Personnel Items are to be considered: 1) The City has retained Mr. Robert Wieken as a mechanical inspector on a contractual basis to assist the Protective Inspections Department with building inspections. Unfortunately, Mr. Weiken, who is semiretired, is undergoing surgery and is unable to perform inspection services for the City. Due to the volume of inspections, it was necessary to contact Mr. John Vujovich, who was the chief building inspector in Inver Grove Heights and is retired, to assist until Mr. Weiken returns to the City as an inspector. Mr. Vujovich will be hired as a consultant under the same arrangement as Mr. Weiken and will work at the pleasure of the chief building inspector. Mr. Vujovich did assist the City of Eagan during the summer of 1983 and is very familiar with the inspection schedules and the City. • • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To retain Mr. John Vujovich as a contractual building inspector to perform building inspection services in the absence of Mr. Robert Weiken. 2) The City has approved a part-time clerk typist which will be included in the clerical pool, bringing the total manpower to 1.5 in the City Hall clerical pool. The advertisements, interviews and selection process has been completed and is the recommendation of the Administrative Assistant, Holly Duffy, that Shelly Lysne be hired as 'a part-time clerk typist to serve the clerical pool under the supervision of the Department of Administration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the temporary services of Mr. John Vujovich and the hiring of a part-time employee, Shelly Lysne. S Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Four -13, FINAL PAYMENT/PARK RIDGE ADDITION C. Contract 83-13, Final Payment/Acceptance (Park Ridge Addition, Et Al.) -- We have received a request for final payment from our consulting engineering firm along with a Certification of Compliance to previously approved plans and specifications for the installation of trunk watermain within Covington Lane in the Park Ridge Addition and a sanitary sewer lateral to service the Robert B. Lewis House for Battered Women on Nicols Road. Final inspections have been performed and verified by representa- tives of the Public Works Maintenance Division with the end product found to be acceptable for perpetual maintenance by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third and final payment of $4,108.58 to S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc., for Contract 83-13 and accept for perpetual maintenance. CONTRACT 83-5, FINAL PAYMENT/TREATMENT PLANT UTILITIES D. Contract 83-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Treatment Plant Utilities) -- We have received a request for final payment from our consulting engineering firm along with a certification of compliance to previously approved plans and specifications for the installation of transmission watermains from the existing wells to the future treatment plant along with sanitary sewer, storm sewer and first phase street improvements to service the water treatment plant and adjacent benefited properties. Final inspections and acceptance has been performed or reviewed by Public Works Maintenance personnel and found to be in order for consideration of acceptance for perpetual maintenance. The final contract amount takes into consideration the approval of Change Orders #1 and #2 listed as additional agenda items under the Consent Agenda for the June 5 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the seventh and final pay request for Contract 83-5 in the amount of $8,516.56 to Northdale Construction Company and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. r • • FJ Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Five It CONTRACT 84-8/WILLIAMS PIPELINE ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT E. Contract 84-8, Approve Williams Pipeline Encroachment Agreement - With the development of the Westbury and Lexington Square Additions, several public improvements had to be initiated to provide the proper utilities for these developments. These consisted of Contracts 84-2 (Wescott Trunk Sanitary Sewer), Contract 84-8 (Westbury and Lexington Square Trunk and Lateral Utilities and Streets) and Contract 84-9 (Lexington Avenue Trunk Watermain). Each of these contracts required the construction of a utility across the existing Williams Brothers Pipeline easement which traverses across the McCarthy property, through the Westbury Addition and proceeds easterly along the southside of Wescott Road, crossing Lexington Avenue. Subsequently, because this exclusive easement of Williams Pipeline requires written permission from the company prior to any construction activity within that easement, it is necessary for the City to enter into an "Easement Encroachment Agreement" with the Williams Pipeline Company. An agreement was prepared by Williams Brothers which authorizes the property owner (Lexington South Incorporated), the developer (Gabbert Development Inc.) and the City to perform grading and utility/street construction work within their easement. Because of the grade changes associated with the development, their standard • policy would have required the pipelines to be relocated to the proper elevation at an estimated cost of $55,000. In lieu of this pipe relocation, they have agreed to accept the addition fill beyond their standard limits in consideration for the City accepting "all direct or indirect increased cost, including but not limited to additional labor, materials, street and trailway repairs, or other damages, arising out of the existance of said improvements, and elevation and grade changes" required by the City's and development's construction activities. The Public Works Director cannot find evidence of a similar agree- ment being entered into between the City and Williams Pipeline for previous pipeline crossings. It appears that this will be the first formal agreement and could be precedent setting for future construction activities. However, it is necessary before authorization can be granted to perform this work. All the above - referenced contracts have already been let and the contractor has proceeded with construction operations on other areas outside these pipeline easements. After review of the agreement by the Public Works Director and City Attorney, it is recommended that the Council approve the agreement and authorize its execution. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the easement • encroachment agreement for Williams Pipeline Company and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 7 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Six NATIONAL FLAG DAY F. National Flag Day -- The City has received a sample Proclamation from the National Flag Day Committee in Baltimore, Maryland, asking that June 14 be recognized as National Flag Day. Enclosed on pageCJ is a copy of a Proclamation for National Flag Day, June 14, 1984. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To proclaim National Flag Day, June 14, 1984. Pi C, J 0 Flag Day Informatl*on w0=91MMSESM1�1 .•.�:Mi,^:'i:'.'Ar�:'::.i•.it:�iMh'1t":'+',Ccti A.�•;t• National Flag DayCommittee418 South Broadway i.✓<.ear•+.YF:A!'!Is..CW`liWi.-•'IUY�KY/Wi'+::• :•iYYW,+•.�K ill?JI'.?Y1L'i,-[:it{a!��' Baltimore. Maryland 21231 Pause For The Pledge of Allegiance SAMPLE PROCLAMATION 481A NATIONAL FLAG DAY, JUNE 14, 1984 WHEREAS, by Act of the Congress of the United States, dated June 14, 1777, the first official flag of the United States was adopted, and WHEREAS, by Act of Congress, dated August 3, 1949, June 14 of each year was designated "National Flag Day" and the Star-Spangled Banner Flag House • Association in Baltimore, Maryland, has been the official sponsor since 1952 of National Flag Day for the United States, and • WHEREAS, on June 14, 1980, the Star-Spangled Banner Flag House Association developed a national campaign to encourage all Americans to PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE of Allegiance as part of National Flag Day ceremonies, and WHEREAS, since this concept caught the imagination of Americans everywhere and has received wide citizen support and recognition, there has now been created the National Flag Day Foundation, Inc. in Baltimore, Maryland to plan the nations Flag Day ceremonies. WHEREAS, Flag Day celebrates our nation's symbol of unity and stands for our country's devotion to freedom to the rule of all and the equal rights of all. NOW, THEREFORE, I, (your name and title), do hereby proclaim June 14, 1984 as Flag Day in (your state), and urge all citizens of (your state) to pause at 7:00 P. M. (EDT) on this date for the Fourth Annual PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE, and recite with all Americans the Pledge of Allegiance to our Flag and Nation. 9 A Prnpram of the Natinnal Flae Dav Foundation. Inc.. Baltimore. Maryland. • E • Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Seven ADVISORY PARKS RESIGNATION/DOUGLAS MCNEELY G. Resignation of Douglas McNeely/Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Member -- Enclosed is a letter from Douglas McNeely, copies on page // submitting his resignation as a member of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. The City Adminis- trator would like to discuss briefly a replacement for Mr. McNeely at the time the Consent Agenda is handled or later in the meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation letter of Douglas McNeely, a member of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. /O _cy 24, 1984 • The Honorable i-lyor end Ci*T, Council of Eagan Nr. Yom Hedgcs, City Administrator - 12r. Iien Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation h'--mbers of the Advisory narks and Recreation Commission Dear I•'adams and Gentlemen: Congratulations on the successful passing of the bond referendum. This will enhanco the city of Eagan and bring us That much closer to the standards that were set in the gaster Parks Pian. I write you today to ask that you accent my i=mediate resignation from the Advisory Parks and Rocreation Commission. Such thought h" gone into t --"-is decision. As you 1,sow, I began- a now occupation last November in bar',cing which rcouires travel time. So far in 1984, I have missed over half of the meetings including sub-committoo and special meetings. Even though the minutes arc prep_arcd in an. cxcellent m.^,rner, much is missed in the form of discussion and debate. I have a1w, ys bccn c believor in giving 1Q0" of your^elf to anything you ene::Rver. In thi: cno- I cC:_1'.ot. Y�4., afore, 1 -.Ch that Pau rGDl ^.Ce M3 with .n per Gon P^e c. ^n commit -,nd Cttcnd. I Lar mnnv fond n3raorias pad hav-- m.a.dc _-,ny fino nccuni:aancies duri- thn pact th_ec and one half years. In my opinion., i:o have the finost ;mayor, City Council, Cit;=dmir-istrator, Director of Parks and Recreation, .,dvisory Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission and city staff^ny populus could hon-- for. • If at nny time I ray be of service to the city of Eagan please don't hesitate to give de a call. Once again let me thank you for your patience and cooperation and keep up the good work. Sinceroly yours, Douglas C. McNeely P.S. Please advise me :;en if you want my copy of the Master Par'.cs Plan back. 0 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Eight CONTRACT 83-5, CHANGE ORDER/WATER TREATMENT PLANT H. Contract 83-5, Approve Change Order #1 (Water Treatment Plant - Utilities and Streets), -- Change Order #1 provides for a change in the scope of the contract to delete a portion of the storm sewer laterals to service the future Water Treatment Plant parking lot due to a conflict of scheduling activities between the treatment plant general contractor and this utility contractor. Because of the completion time frame for the City contract, it was not possible for the storm sewer lateral to be constructed. However, the contractor had purchased the materials which were delivered to the site and subsequently secured and stored by City personnel. Therefore, the original installation of this storm sewer lateral is being deleted from the contract. However, the contractor is being paid for the materials that have been delivered. Admin- istratively the proper way to handle this transaction is through a change order to the standard contract. Change Order #1 provides for an addition to the standard contract amount of $1,465.76 for the materials only. The reduction in payment for the deletion of the actual- installation will be accounted for in the final close out of the contract by a reduction in final payment quantity. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order • #1 to Contract 83-5 in the amount of $1,465.76 (ADD) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. E CONTRACT 83-5, CHANGE ORDER #2/WATER TREATMENT PLANT I. Contract 83-5, Change Order #2 (Water Treatment Plant -- Streets and Utilities) -- During the jacking of the trunk watermain underneath Yankee Doodle Road to connect the well sealed to the Water Treatment Plant, the contractor encountered a Northwestern Bell Telephone manhole vault. The location of this telephone manhole had not been located by Northwestern Bell at either the design or the construction phase of the work and subsequently its existence was not known until the contractor hit it on his jacking operations. Subsequently, the contractor was delayed for eight working hours until Northwestern Bell could perform the modifications to the manhole to allow us to proceed with our construction phase. Subsequently, the City's contractor has submitted a claim for $1,624 for down time delay and remobiliza- tion costs which amount to $1,624. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #2 to Contract 83-5 in the amount of $1,624 (ADD) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /1, Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Nine L I ORDER PUBLIC HEARING/ST. FRANCIS WOODS 3RD ADDITION J. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition) -- We have received a petition to vacate a portion of the drainage and utility easement across Lots 1, 2, 5 and 6, of Block 2, St. Francis Wood 3rd Addition as shown on the map enclosed on page // The vacation of this drainage and utility easement is requested to allow a better location of the townhouse units within these blocks due the con- straints imposed upon these building sites by the existing ponding area located at the rear of these lots. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and order the public hearing to vacate drainage and utility ease- ments over Lots 1, 2, 5 and 6 of Block 2, St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition to be held on , July , 1984. CONTRACT 83-1, CHANGE ORDER #5/WATER TREATMENT PLANT K. Contract 83-1, Change Order #5, Water Treatment Plant (Control Valves) -- We have received a recommendation from our consulting engineer to expand a portion of the Water Treatment Plant contract to incorporate two changes as follows: • Part A: This provides for a change in the control console in the Water Treatment Plant to incorporate the Lexington Avenue booster station controls which would constructed during the fall of 1984 to be put on line during June of 1985. At the time of the design of the Water Treatment Plant, it was not anticipated that this Lexington Avenue booster station would be constructed at its present time schedule. Because of its schedule, it is appropriate to incorporate the telemetry equipment and control modules into the overall control console of the Water Treatment Plant.(ADD $14,080) Part B: This provides for incorporation of future pump control modules, digital displays and alarm controllers within the Water Treatment Plant control console. To incorpor- ate this work at this time will be substantially less expensive than future field installations as additional wells are added to the system every few years. (ADD $4,090) This proposed change order has been reviewed with the Public Works Director and the Utility Superintendent and found to be timely and cost effective to be included under this contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #5 • to Contract 83-1 in the amount of an additional $18,170 and author- ize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /A k WET LAND ,v.w. c>awea of i �NoarN L,rc or curuor 8 our�or a EASY SHORE Ii E—� \ 1 59.00 X56 MEti� a \ G�`1N E c \ \ UJA iB-Z c�JRVEY \� 29 0b / 3e.� 3 CD i \ 00 SSB 9,.m de of AC6rrEr YB L,NE 00..c °0 S N CO IN 0 LOT + L0y !u O OY'Co 3 6s 96 \ lm uQ Zoll .130 0TR 9S`� 6s 0 N ♦ n r ry roP coT o° a m P cP o ,? ) io D4 ss ^� �o 2 O. q� co oO,. N Rr�ERay �/ Q nJ O Z 9 �1ss y° F �B \ F U J D G E yNr a .�� "k-11 O°� S ree �. w�ro T \aboo rl� `�1/\f\r'I wwr�o oFJWvepry io2Oo oo••E c,"� / psi e7 k 4v J _ _ ti 3e oo 89 a, / oO� ho A�Ir. r I r LIi I I I.I�� 0 0 W� W 5 �e�oo 3z.0o r$ P� �—� oaA �nac a o / 6 Q ,� 0 n �1TILILY ESSLMCdi 6 0 a9 W O U (O !� l 38.00 •OO O s s N N J� W m M o M O I ^ •� /� ?p �/ Q CI N pj ? wcsrecLY zLo W e v d T f m M OurL T c— K Loy2 o % O i 38, LOT m .p )� o S 3 0 YI WEST LI�i4 �e`�o 00 E 3z.e0 �OT4 u k�~ .EI 00 fE 7^�-- it4?4 • �ra"l/° S 5 o�> lb 10 78* 0p ju1144C VA, ` i. Ile oOUTLOT A CN Gtr � -.. ♦ A. �. 'n. Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Ten • Is FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/CENTURY ADDITION L. Final Plat Application, Century Addition -- We have received an application for final plat approval for the Century Addition located in the northwest corner of Coachman Road and Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28). Enclosed on page /6 is a copy of the final plat for Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approved by Council action on October 18, 1983, have been complied with as well as the final plat con- figuration. In addition, all final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed and approved by staff and is being forwarded to the Council for favorable consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat application for the Century Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 1:!5 • I i _ p A :�� w ro a.ar «n ur rYI w lY _ i.r or In.. rr a.r. t.. 80 L _ M.r...lp. t..r .1 ww.•yrr101. rN rY 4.. -- 1 56�Y•51'00-E ip cc;i'n ...,Abbirlu rr _!:'% 1 u . ro-. 1, n.rn..r .Id ••••- u r -. ul 1� d rr .e..� .1 t.w........ ...n ..... `i -.r H _ .'tlU 7 ij wN alar 4r r! nu. •• _� wtw .r.. trlr MN urn ,_ I .r Mllir••e u r M W r min •surN a � In rl Xlldr 1 In_'n ]0 ba � 1T. eortn it. or CA,a.N. Na, Isle q u.we te mw a b\rl of 9outn 09 an... fl elms... 00 .r.M. [a.0. n a✓« NORTH o n.m.s t/! mcn by a inah floe NIN- MrIt 00tt 910urbW]-=Is-- I ..r Pltl. e.N YG -N0 N6!, u=Is---U • Wna 1 4ntl ,.n lrf llul i\li W.r�r..rr IIIN 1. M •Illu .1 �r ..mrr .• Ittt. • '<IN \., rr w 41r .••.NN le 4.n t`rot.. •rl{ t or aa9oi a.m..t•a to DELMAR H. SCHWANZ "' PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO REVISION .. •r' '"db�.'��11'I+�(•�>'4';. LAND SURVEYORS INC. 4 U LOCATION MAF' �.. .,... •e .+1 .N. r.nl \r w.I r. .I •,.•-•.n�,.......� ... rr.l p U. r.•nr .erim. r b. rr r rnYlo .uuN ul. r•r •1 — SEC 9- IVIP27. Rd 23 I run mu.a .r...r .vmanu n• in . 1 w I le dmY •...wl uI' I. i.IpNrr d gnld. 0. i1rMq r,tN rN do..n. - ' xl 1[M ' T l - I i.n i1 v. f 1 oYr . L rl•e,r xe X4l Orr � I - 1 L .Irr.. J• wf ..li [I:..Ire. wwY« lo.wwr... Ilhww 4r..1 ... M...,.. s lu iw.rl pnpr .elr � i.r a IM. it ilrYr i. il•m•.r. a 4w«I r•r, •. � ' it %i ri ii^rvaila.Yu rr rrl...wa _ M luaa4 Ina.ry o .enl.y. 1 41111 -E I'- li- -S69.OB- S99•51'00 tl / 1 r[ rlr,l 411w1 YN el rl,e•,Mlir, • e• w v_ _w.ao _ — — _ — ——P��: ep :Le.TG.. r _Iv — _ r / . Y�.r, •L s rl 81 2 8 r 8 3 .m • 8 § .[9•]e Cr,r rl:M Irntulw l..... , tr ar•rl. i elrMul,N r �T o n. e9.- se]•v'ao[ 9 n. x•f�n- Q \r' 0- q.. 8 _ – _ 8 l.aa / : 1 e..•p r rib nn 1 Y« ..-.rr .rNl.u...w nm•n wule.r \I. rlr� p p p Y1 / ' • 4-.wn n• Y wlr rl„ = w rra.r • e ,♦ alar• r Pellr e,.rrr• .- 2 _ _lel.: _ _193. _ _ 1, a re,l. Irl, mi ,Y I w ar«r•• • wne.„r.. 1�' IOa er wI•.r w. i. e.,u. n,.rr•,. rrr rn,.+ o. hj I q G . � l • I i _ p A :�� w ro a.ar «n ur rYI w lY _ i.r or In.. rr a.r. t.. 80 L _ M.r...lp. t..r .1 ww.•yrr101. rN rY 4.. -- 1 56�Y•51'00-E ip cc;i'n ...,Abbirlu rr _!:'% 1 u . ro-. 1, n.rn..r .Id ••••- u r -. ul 1� d rr .e..� .1 t.w........ ...n ..... `i -.r H _ .'tlU 7 ij wN alar 4r r! nu. •• _� wtw .r.. trlr MN urn ,_ I .r Mllir••e u r M W r min •surN a � In rl Xlldr 1 In_'n ]0 ba � 1T. eortn it. or CA,a.N. Na, Isle q u.we te mw a b\rl of 9outn 09 an... fl elms... 00 .r.M. [a.0. n a✓« NORTH o n.m.s t/! mcn by a inah floe NIN- MrIt 00tt 910urbW]-=Is-- I ..r Pltl. e.N YG -N0 N6!, u=Is---U • Wna 1 4ntl ,.n lrf llul i\li W.r�r..rr IIIN 1. M •Illu .1 �r ..mrr .• Ittt. • '<IN \., rr w 41r .••.NN le 4.n t`rot.. •rl{ t or aa9oi a.m..t•a to DELMAR H. SCHWANZ "' PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO REVISION .. •r' '"db�.'��11'I+�(•�>'4';. LAND SURVEYORS INC. 4 U • • Agenda Information June 5, 1984, City Page Eleven Memo Council Meeting FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/SUNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION M. Final Plat Application, Suncliff 2nd Addition -- We have received an application for final plat approval for the Suncliff 2nd Addition which is the second phase progression of this develop- ment. Enclosed on page /to is a copy of the final plat for Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval approved by Council on October 18, 1983, have been complied with in addition to this final plat conforming to the concept of the originally approved preliminary plat layout. In addition, all final plat application materials have been sub- mitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat of the Suncliff 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /7 1 i 1. BLACKMAWN 6r S vim[ 0rLOr q �N S ! Y%Oe'E A ira: •3 r�•Irrlc S ws!`+j�e6 A y�..-CUFF�7�..-_ ROA[ '�M!�µu•'mY!YY. "b mR 4u1.•uu i. q['ii/!!Gee }Lq}�b'��euC elx 6 vn 19ay -q1 lx- SUN CLIFF SECOND ADDITION r'"r I�Y'•�w'v'fis o+ ♦ p •� 3 n I e n e.Hvu'ig,F F q 1 wmw w. r.m erlme. a vNih Mry ! MI n .YP VN YP�e ;mnrl 6 e1 1•e. N IOIi ^n� N M [f•uLx •I Irl OM YI Ir4 1M x•4n Yb J �b M 1/• N ��4., r •een, .um sn•...• mNena Nnen n. Iun� n. emN. n r,•,rn a e.P W xer nbrc• Der• Mn yearn 4, vf•q' up•[ 9 L x IIN• ww" WP Nc. n. T 2 A 2 x�,•T O'� S.uL� e Y_ .a ..gin l:r• eMn / SUN CLIFF SECOND ADDITION r'"r I�Y'•�w'v'fis o+ ♦ p •� 3 n I e n CR. WINDEN B ASSOCIATES INC snKO $ VEYOese••-• is 0 0 F q 1 =� ..gin l:r• eMn / ah7 '��. I•-hnr F b � �:.' m nn•� mhe W 8� iWr �Z• Z ♦ �•me �x••� a -'"gin III ••/e a�ip �' e .}' '', � u.ma R_n�l S < III' ! 1 ■? �q •,r,nws ! N/bxP9 nam ,•. C�- 4 1 {{ S e£ CR. WINDEN B ASSOCIATES INC snKO $ VEYOese••-• is 0 0 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Twelve is E FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/HOLMES ADDITION N. Final Plat Application, Holmes Addition -- We received an application for final plat approval for the Holmes Addition located at .the northeast corner of Quarry Lane and Towerview Road. A copy of this final plat referencing these two residential lots is enclosed on page 2,0 for the Council's review. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval by Council action on April 3, 1984, have been complied with. In addition, all final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat application for the Holmes Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. // HOLMES ADDITION P11 NOONEEaONG CON PIIMY, INC. SNCEI 1 OE 1 SIIEEIS O. ,• ,I '• �1"" 1 �� LC MAYO LAKE ;n�/ _ BLOCC K I0-0 � 1 r y.. s P11 NOONEEaONG CON PIIMY, INC. SNCEI 1 OE 1 SIIEEIS • 171 • Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen GRADING PERMIT/LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH & LEXINGTON 2ND ADDITION O. Grading Permit Application, Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd Addition -- we received an application for a grading permit to perform the subdivision grading prior to final plat process for Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place South. The grading plan conforms to the preliminary plat approved by Council on April 17, 1984. All permit application requirements have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the grading permit application for Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd Addition. a/ Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen u FINAL PLAT/SAFARI ADDITION P. Final Plat Application, Safari Addition -- We have received an application for final plat approval for the Safari Addition located on the northwest corner of Safari Pass and Galaxie Avenue. Enclosed on page 2-3 is a copy of the final plat for the Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approved by Council action on March 22, 1984, have been complied with. In addition, all final plat application materials have been submitted and reviewed by staff and is being forwarded to the Council with a recommendation of favorable consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat application for the Safari Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • • 0702 I F%giIRIT "A'• i THE SAFARI ADDITION I` .. i`. J !1 I Ct C = I i:•�Iis.mm-_ _ ___.^'• rO� •r^'m a •ae'ar r.�asnnm•.warn 509.50.22•Eaf31wG �•pl___ � •. n bb .90 •r �040 4s1 1 T�• .. -OUTLOT B ? It 1.T W poop •f`�nrA�t'1• Ot�1y _ fie lq ` a V rrpnp P lal•e m fll I�fl • In , a! • l 1 J• 1'' n +„a +• ��� 3 A • may. J `�_ � y1 � _ J. 'C7 N 'f. Q • ¢ ,e �,4 P.321 a6 •337 �' t1�: 5 _ o _ Mtgo 05 14 aSe �• y."2 '”; mai • i D• �1 p ,1 o,t. r � to . J. •• �' ",, // NORTH �o�'f ►"a'e OUTLOT A.;A, In 'potilt's i q; z •,• 3 0 i• •' ,a •. • n» ...I uM er aM nR er aM avvl 1. 6. b 2 $ `�•• = \ � •nu••a to Mo • eeerly er bran error• bf ' er 81. i� ) e bran• IR Ien er n fnen Inn olo• •w•.a •\ r1$ •.< •Itn oNLLlc uo orlpl "!II u•t1'. wlro \\•� rl I �Oanlr•1•e •no-+. •o t •` r• pre 7 19♦ Ira mn aml •4114 •u•nenu •n •nn.n an•nr LOCATION MAP �;U l7. 7W 77-A 273 r r r7 a DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS I INC. I r pp11 L Mlna + !r•a In •lean• u+lu• •a+•r•br IMle. •M ••eaJr•e.fNa Y lel• IIMr. "n" 1Y faa In aan M djolnla IIMM 11OIVaee M lM 01•l. ')R Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page fifteen J • PROJECT 411/FEASIBILITY REPORT Q. Project 411, Review Request/Authorize Feasibility Report - Patrick Eagan Park (Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) -- With the proposed development of the Birch Park Addition (formerly the Windcrest Addition) and the Pilot Pointe Addition (located between Skovdale No. 1 and 2) combined with the future storm sewer discharge from the multiple residential and commercial development of the Lexington South property at Lexington and County Road 30, the outlet for Patrick Eagan Park into Hurley Lake will become imminent within the next 1 - 2 years. Due to the fact that this outlet will have to cross Pat McCarthy's property to discharge into Hurley Lake, it is recommended that a feasibility report be prepared to discuss the proposed improvements at a public hearing to authorize the subsequent initiation of easement acquisi- tion through condemnation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 411 (Patrick Eagan Park - trunk storm sewer outlet). 1� Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen PROJECT 404/UTILITIES A. Project 404, Lexington Place South and 2nd Addition (Utilities) -- In response to a petition received by the developer (U.S. Homes/Orrin Thompson), the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of utilities to service the Lexington Place 2nd Addition and the Lexington Place South Addition located east of Lexington Avenue at Duckwood Drive. The feasibility report was presented to the Council on May 1 with the public hearing being scheduled for June 5. Enclosed on pages .24 through �— is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's review during the public hearing. A copy of this report has been provided to the developer for his review prior to the public hearing. As of this date, the staff has not received any comments or objections to this proposed project. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners who would be assessed with a portion of this project. L ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing • and approve/deny Project 404 for the installation of utilities to service Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place South. -'7J m 0 REPORT ON LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH ADDITION AND LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 0 PROJECT. NO. 404 Qe" EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE N0. 49306 /�oaedLroo, ilaseae, f4a�iilila a 4d"c&4eed, lac. • � P� Mr.�.�mato 2335 V 9...A #Vk .p 36 cS'!. P..4 Af"...y 55113 PA... 612.636-4600 May 1, 1984 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Lexington Place South S Lexington Place 2nd Addition Project 404 Our File No. 49306 Dear Mayor and Council: 0,0 G. Ronrsrroo. P.£. Reba w. Ronny. P.E. Jm hC. Ar Vhk. P.E. 81.Ww A. 4mDrr,, P.E. Rmn.rd E. Turns, P.E. damn C. M. , P.E. GHnn R. Cwt, P.E. KWh A.Gordon. P lLoroal E voyn. R.ha K Four, Rolm G. P.E. .Namur L. S k. AL D.m C. RurrsNr. P.E. /ar, A. Rourdm P. E. lfml A. Herron. P.E. TM K. F. d. P.E. ..q~ r. R.urmann, P.E. Robe R. PTr//me PE. 1+. Lr .PF. Cnerhr A. Elwk. L. Af. P...blr Ho &f M. OW, Transmitted herewith is our report for Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd Addition, Project 404. This report covers sanitary, sever, water main, and storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a • mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC. -;;7;(7,,,Z Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct super- vision and that I am aduly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. / Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Date: May 1„ 1984 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by,!. 'cal -LL) 41h, . Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Date:—�—� 7 • 0601c A7 • • • SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer to service Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd Addition. Lexington Place South is located south of Duckwood Drive and east of Lexington Avenue and includes 134 single family lots. Lexington Place 2nd Addition is located north of Duckwood Drive and east of the first phase for Lexington Place. Lexington Place 2nd Addition includes 6-16 unit, 1-12 unit, and 1-8 unit condominium building. Also included is the construction of a trunk water main along Lexington Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: SANITARY SEWER: Lexington Place South - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes an 8 inch di- ameter sanitary sewer constructed at a proper depth to service Lexington Place South. The sanitary sewer will connect to a proposed 8" sanitary sewer to be constructed as part of Lexington Square. The sanitary sewer will extend north from Wescott Road as shown on the attached drawing. An easement will be re- quired for construction of the sanitary sewer north from Wescott Road to the south line of Lexington Place South. It is anticipated this easement will be acquired by U.S. Home Corporation developers for Lexington Place South. Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes an 8 inch diameter sanitary sewer constructed in Blue Jay Way as shown on the at- tached drawing. The sanitary sewer will connect to an existing manhole con- structed as part of the first phase. The two 16 unit buildings located north of Blue Jay Way will be served by the existing sanitary sewer constructed as part of first phase for Lexington Place. The 16 unit building located north 0601c Page 1. Z� of Duckwood Drive midway between Blue Jay Way will be served by an extension of the proposed sanitary sewer from Lexington Place South. WATER MAIN: Lexington Place South - Water main proposed within Lexington Place South in- cludes a 6 inch diameter water main as shown on the attached drawing. Also included is the construction of an 18 inch diameter trunk water main along the west side of Lexington Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road. The trunk water main will connect to an existing 18 inch water main at both Wescott Road and Duckwood drive. The 6 inch water main in Lexington Place South will con- nect to the 16 inch trunk water main in Duckwood Drive at three locations and to the 18 inch trunk water main in Lexington Avenue at one location. Also in- cluded is the required number of valves and hydrants. Lexington Place South is located in the intermediate pressure zone with static pressures of 60 psi. Ll Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Water main proposed within Lexington Place 2nd Addition includes extending the 16 inch diameter trunk water main in Duckwood • Drive to it's east line. Also included is extending a 6 inch diameter water main south from Duckwood Drive along the easterly portion of Blue Jay Way which will connect to the existing 6 inch water main in the northerly portion of Blue Jay Way. The 6 inch diameter water main will be looped to service the 2-16 unit buildings located north of Blue Jay Way. Also included is the re- quired number of valves and hydrants. Lexington Place 2nd Addition is located in the intermediate pressure zone with static pressures of 60 psi. SERVICES: Lexington Place South - Internal lots within Lexington Place South will be served by 4 inch diameter sanitary sewer and 1 inch diameter water. It is proposed to construct the service line 15 feet beyond the property line. It is also proposed to construct water services from the 18" trunk main in Lex- • Page 2. 0601c z9 • ington Avenue to the existing homes. For purposes of this report it is as- sumed these services will be 1-1/2" diameter to provide the proper pressure. Lexington place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed from the main line to within 15 feet of the building unit. Sanitary sewer service are proposed to be 6 inch diameter and water service are proposed to be 4 inch diameter. STORM SEWER: Lexington Place South - Storm sewer- proposed herein will convey storm water runoff from Lexington Place South to an existing 24" CMP culvert beneath Lex- ington Avenue as shown on the attached drawing. From this point storm water will be conveyed .naturally through an open channel to Hurly Lake (Pond JP -11). The outlet for this pond is presently being constructed as part of • Project No. 382. Storm water within Lexington Place South will be contained within three storm water ponds which are discussed as follows: Storage NWL HWL Ac -Ft. Outflow Pond JP -45A 899.7 900.7 1.74 0.5 cfs Pond JP -45 894.0 897.3 3.14 1.0 cfs Pond JP -45B 893 895.5 3.19 1.0 cfs As indicated in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan, Pond JP -46 located di- rectly east of Lexington Place South in Carriage Hills Golf course was in- tended to outlet to Pond JP -45. Reviewing in detail the present characteris- tics of Pond JP -46, it is recommended it's outlet -be directed to the southeast to Pond JP -42 thus confining the drainage within Carriage Hills Golf Course to • it's own boundaries along with Lexington Place South. Storm sewer pipe pro - Page 3. 0601c ,30 posed herein include a combination of 24", 18", 15" and 12" diameter storm • sewer pipe. Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Storm sewer proposed within Lexington Place 2nd Addition includes extending an 18" diameter storm sewer pipe southerly in Blue Jay Way as shown on the attached drawing. Also included is construction of a manhole in conjunction with two catch basins and 15" storm sewer pipe within the cul-de-sac located northerly of Blue Jay Way. The manhole will be con- structed over the, existing 12" storm sewer constructed as part of the first phase. It should also be noted that with the increase in development for this drainage area, Pond DP -10 is presently experiencing a flooding condition and that it's outlet to Pond DP -5 and then to Pond DP -4 should be considered shortly. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA • NW 1/4, SECTION 14 Lexington Place First Addition, Lot 1, Block 3 (Future Lexington Place 2nd Addition) SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Williams and Larue Addition Block 1; Lots 1-4 Parcel 011-52 (Future Lexington Place South) Parcel 030-53 Parcel 041-53 Parcel 043-53 Parcel 044-53 SE 1/4, SECTION 15 St. Francis Wood Addition - Outlot A • Parcel 012-76 0601c Page 4. 3/ COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located • at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH Sanitary Sewer $ 295,020 Water Main Lexington Avenue Trunk Water Main 177,330 Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main 149,010 Services Lexington Avenue Services 11,290 Lexington Place South Services 107,180 Storm Sewer 168,940 Page 5. 0601c 3-7-1 LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION Sanitary Sewer S 25,820 • Water Main 81,190 Services 36,410 Storm Sewer 22,280 TOTAL ............................ $1,074,470 The total estimated project cost is $1,074,470 which includes contingen- cies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 27% and in- clude legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to belevied against the benefited prop- erty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. SANITARY SEWER: Lexington Place South - Sanitary sewer proposed herein is lateral and is therefore proposed to be assessed entirely to the benefited property. The • sanitary sewer from Wescott Road north to the south line Lexington Place South Page 5. 0601c 3-7-1 is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis at the lateral benefit from trunk rate in effect at the time.of the public hearing. A corner lot credit • of 150' in conjunction with assuming only the developable front footage would be assessed was the basis for determining the assessable footage. All remain- ing costs were divided equally amongst the benefited lots in Lexington Place South including 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. Trunk area assessments for this area are pending as part of Project No. 361 Wescott Trunk Sanitary Sewer. Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer proposed herein is to be as- sessed equally amongst the benefited units in Lexington Place 2nd Addition. Trunk area sanitary sewer for this area was previously assessed as part of Project No. 58. WATER MAIN: Lexington Place South - Trunk water main within Lexington Avenue is proposed to be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate in effect at the time of • the public hearing based on the present zoning use. It is proposed to.assess only 50% of the front footage along Lexington Avenue to those parcels which will receive benefit for looping purposes. However, it is proposed that the trunk water main in Duckvood Drive be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate based on the entire front footage 'abutting Lexington Place South. It is also proposed to assess those areas which have not been previously as- sessed for trunk area water main if they receive direct benefit. Lateral water main within Lexington Place South will be assessed completely to the benefited lots in addition to assuming 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Trunk water main within Duckvood Drive is pro- posed to be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate in effect at the time of the public hearing for the entire front footage abutting Lexington • 0601c Page 6. 35 • Place 2nd Addition. Lateral water main within Lexington Place 2nd Addition will be assessed equally amongst the benefited units. Trunk area water main for this area was previously assessed as part of Project No. 58. SERVICES: Lexington Place South - Services proposed within Lexington Place South will be assessed equally amongst the benefited lots including 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. It is proposed that the cost for the water main services along Lexington Avenue be assessed equally to the benefited lots. Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Services proposed within Lexington Place 2nd Addition will be assessed equally amongst the benefited units. STORM SEWER: Lexington Place. South - Storm sever within Lexington Place South is considered lateral storm sewer and is therefore proposed to be assessed equally amongst • the benefited lots including 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. Because the storm sever witnin Lexington Place South conveys drainage only within it's boundaries and is not designed to extend beyond it's boundaries, no areas out- side of Lexington Place South excepting the 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53 are proposed to be assessed for lateral storm sever. Trunk area storm sever is proposed to be assessed to the area shown on the attached drawing based on the rates in effect at the time of the public hearing. TRUNK RATES: Trunk area and lateral benefit from trunk rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: TRUNK AREA Trunk Water Main Oversize Agricultural Residential Platted Lot • Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize Single Family 0601c Page 7. $1,120/Acre $535/lot $0.045/a.f. LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sever $13.10/F.F. Lateral Benefit Water Main Single Family $10.84/F.F. Multiple $17.87/F.F. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Sanitary Sewer Lateral Lateral Benefit Lateral Assessment Water. Main Trunk Lateral Trunk Area Lateral Benefit from Trunk Lateral Assessment Services Lateral Lateral Assessment 0601c LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH Project Cost Revenue Balance $295,020 $ 6,550 288,470 $295,020 $295,020 - 0 - $177,330 149,010 $ 52,204 46,785 149,010 $326,340 $247,999 -$ 78,341 $119,100 $119,100 $119,100 $119,100 - 0 - Page 8. 3$ 0 • • Storm Sever • Lateral $168,940 Lateral Assessment $168,940 Trunk Area Assessment 87,667 $168,940 $256,607 +$ 87,667 TOTAL............................................... +S 9,326 LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION Project Cost Revenue Balance Sanitary Sever Lateral $ 25,820 Lateral Assessment $ 25,820 $ 25,820 $ 25,820 - 0 - Water Main • Trunk $ 34,740 Lateral 46,450 Lateral Benefit from Trunk $ 13,796 Lateral Assessment 46,450 $ 81,190 $ 60,246 -$ 20,944 Services Lateral $ 36,410 Lateral Assessment $ 36,410 $ 36,410 $ 36,410 - 0 - Storm Sever Lateral $ 22,280 Lateral Assessment $ 22,280 $ 22,280 $ 22,280 - 0 - • TOTAL ............................................... -$ 20,944 Page 9. 0601c 36 The total estimated trunk fund balance for Lexington Place South and Lex- ington Place 2nd Addition is -$11,618 (-$20,944 + $9,326 = -$11,618). Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plane and Specifications Open Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Taxes 0601c PROJECT SCHEDULE Page 10. 37 0 May 1, 1984 June 5,1984 June 5, 1984 June 29, 1984 July 3, 1984 Fall, 1984 Spring, 1985 Spring, 1986 0 11 • APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH PROJECT NO. 404 A. SANITARY SEWER 6,710 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 0'-20' dp. in pl. @ $15.00/l.f. $100,650 750 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 20'-40' dp. in pl. @ $50.00/l.f. 37,500 38 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 34,200 230 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/each 16,100 10 Lin.ft. 8" Outside drop @ $120.00/lin.ft. 1,200 300 Lin.ft. 4" CISP Service riser in pl. @ $18.00/lin.ft. 5,400 141 Each 8" x 4" wye in pl. @ $50.00/each 7,050 1 Each Connect MH to existing 8" PVC @ $200.00/each 200 300 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 3,000 LUMP SUM Clear b grub tree @ $1,000.00/L.S. 1,000 7,460 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 11,190 • 2.5 Acre Seed w/fertilizer b mulch @ 51,500.00/acre 3,750 Total $221,240 +5% Contingencies 11,060 $232,300 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 62,720 TOTAL................................................. $295,020 - J 0601c Page 11. B. WATER MAIN a) Lexington Avenue Trunk Water Main (Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road) 2,680 Lin.ft. 18" DIP Water main in pl. @ $37.00/lin.ft. 60 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $15.00/lin.ft. 60 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 6" DIP v/carrier pipe @ $100.00/lin.ft. 2 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,200.00/each 1 Each 18" Butterfly valve and box @ $2,400.00/each 3 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve 6 box @ $450.00/each 7,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 2 Each Connect 18" DIP to existing 18" DIP @ $500.00/each 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2.0 Acres Seed with fertilizer 6 mulch @ $1,500.00/acre 320 Ton Class 2 shouldering material @ $8.00/ton 2,740 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. Total +5Z Contingencies +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest TOTAL................................................ b) Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main 6,370 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 12 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 11 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $450.00/each 6,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 6,370 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/Lb. Total +5% Contingencies 0601c +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest TOTAL............................................... Page 12. 34 40 $ 99,160 900 6,000 2,400 2,400 1,350 9,100 1,000 1,000 3,000 2,560 4,110 $132,980 6,650 $139,630 37,700 • $177,330 . $ 76,440 12,000 4,950 7,800 1,000 9.555 $111,745 5,585 $117,330 31,680 $149,010 • • C. SERVICES a) Lexington Avenue Services 320 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 114" Type "K" copper in pl. @ $24.00/l.f. $ 7,680 6 Each 114" Corporation atop in pl. @ $50.00/each 300 6 Each 114" Curb stop 6 box in pl. @ $80.00/each 480 Total $ 8,460 +5Z Contingencies 430 $ 8,890 +27Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 2,400 TOTAL............................................... $ 11,290 b) Lexington Place South Services 5,640 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $5.00/lin.ft. $ 28,200 5,640 Lin.ft. 1" Type "K" copper in pl. @ $5.00/lin.ft. 28,200 141 Each 1" Corporation atop in pl. @ $30.00/each 4,230 141 Each 1" Curb stop 6 box in pl. @ $80.00/each 11,280 5,640 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 8,460 Total $ 80,370 • +5Z Contingencies 4,020 $ 84,390 +27Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bund Interest 22,790 L 0601c TOTAL ................................................ $107,180 Page 13. Z D. STORM SEWER 240 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $34.00/lir,.ft. 860 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 640 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 1,850 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 8 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 6 Each Std. 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 8 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 1 Each 24" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $1,200.00/each 3 -Each 18" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $900.00/each 1 Each 15" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 4 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash`guard @ S700.00/each LUMP SUM Clear 6 grub trees @ $1,000.00/L.S. 30 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. I 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pii pe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 3,590 Lin.ft. .Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 2.0 Acres Seed w/fertilizer b mulch @ $1,500.00/acre Total +5X Contingencies +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin'-& Bond Interest TOTAL ................... .......................... LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH SUPDIARY A. SANITARY SEWER B. WATER MAIN a) Lexington Avenue TrunklWater Main b) Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main C. SERVICE a) Lexington Avenue Services I b) Lexington Place South Services D. STORM SEWER TOTAL LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH ............ i Page 14. 0601c I 5 8,160 • 24,080, 15,360 40,700 7,200 5,400 6,400 1,200 2,700 800 2,800 1,000 1,500 1,000 5,385 3,000 $126,685 6,335 • $133,020 35,920 $168,940 $295,020 177,330 149.010 11,290 107,180 168,940 $908,770 • • LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION PROJECT NO. 404 A. SANITARY SEWER 730 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sever in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft. $ 10,220 6 Each Std. 4' dia. MH v/cstg. @ $900.00/each Lin.ft. 5,400 12 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/lin.ft. Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 840 8 Each 8"x6" wye in pl. @ $50.00/each 2,000 400 1 Each Connect 8" PVC to ex. MH @ $400.00/each 6,000 400 100 Cu.yd. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. Each 1,000 730 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $300.00/each 1,095 100 Cu.yd. Total $ 19,355 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. +52 Contingencies 975 Total $ 60,875 $ 20,330 3,055 +272 Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 5,490 TOTAL............................................... $ 25,820 B. WATER MAIN • 780 Lin.ft. 16" DIP Water main in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 21,840 1,590 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 19,080 4 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 4,000 1 Each 16" Butterfly valve b box @ $2,000.00/each 2,000 2 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $450.00/each 900 6,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 7,800 1 Each Connect 16" DIP to existing 16" DIP @ $400.00/each 400 1 Each Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $300.00/each 300 100 Cu.yd. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 2,370 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 3,555 Total $ 60,875 +52 Contingencies 3,055 $ 63,930 +272 Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 17,260 • TOTAL ................................................ $ 81,190 Page 15. 0601c C. SERVICES 1,360 Lin.ft 7 Each 1,360 Lin.ft 8 Each 1,360 Lin.ft D. STORM SEWER 250 Lin.ft. 70 Lin.ft. ._ 4 Each 4 Each 1 Each 50 Cu.yds. 280 Lin.ft. 0601c 0 6" PVC Sanitary sever service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 8,160 6" PVC Clean-out @ $100.00/each 700 4" DIP Water main service @ $10.00/lin.ft. 13,600 4" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $350.00/each 2,800 Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 2,040 Total $ 27,300 +5X Contingencies 1,370 $ 28,670 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 7,740 TOTAL................................................. $ 36,410 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 7,000 15" RCP Storm sever in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 1,680 Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 3,600 Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 3,200 Connect 18" RCP to existing 18" RCP @ $300.00/each 300 • Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 500 Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 420 Total $ 16,700 +5% Contingencies 840 $ 17,540 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 4,740 TOTAL................................................ $ 22,280 LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION SUMMARY A. SANITARY SEWER $ 25,820 B. WATER MAIN 81,190 C. SERVICE 36,410 D. STORM SEWER 22,280 TOTAL LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDN. ...... $165,700 Page 16. a • • APPENDIX,B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL . LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH PROJECT NO. 404 A. SANITARY SEWER a) Lateral Benefit from Sever Assessable Total Parcel Description Front Footage Rate/FF Assessment Parcel 030-53 250 $13.10 $3,275 Parcel 041-53 250 $13.10 3,275 $6,550 Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place South • Block 1, Lots 1-8 8 $2,045 $ 16,367 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $2,045 59,331 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $2,045 18,412 Block 4, Lots 1-10 10 $2,045 20,458 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $2,045 20,458 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 16,367 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 20,458 Outlot F (13 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 26,597 Outlot G (18 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 36,826 Outlot H (11 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 22,508 Outlot I (8 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 16,367 SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 044-53 (7 Lot Equivalent $2,045 14,321 TOTAL ............. 141 $288,470 • Page 17. 0601c B. WATER MAIN a) Lateral Parcel Description Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 Block 2, Lots 1-29 Block 3, Lots 1-9 Block 4, Lots 1-10 Block 5, Lots 1-10 Outlot D Outlot E Outlot F Outlot G Outlot H Outlot I SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 044-53 TOTAL ............. b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk • (7 Lot Equivalent) $1,057, 7,398 • 141 $149,010 Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Lexington Place South (1384.23 F.F. x $10.84/FF - $15,005) Block 1, Lots 1-8 Total No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment 8 2, Lots $1,057 $ 8,454 29 $112 $1,057 30,647 9 1-9 9 $1,057 9,511 10 Block 4, $1,057 10,568 10 $1,057 10,568 (8 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 8,454 (10 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 10,568 (13 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 13,739 (18 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 19,023 (11 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 11,625 ( 8 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 8,454 (7 Lot Equivalent) $1,057, 7,398 • 141 $149,010 Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Lexington Place South (1384.23 F.F. x $10.84/FF - $15,005) Block 1, Lots 1-8 8 $112 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $112 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $112 Block 4, Lots 1-10 10 $112 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $112 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $112 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $112 Outlot F (13 Lot Equivalent) $112 Outlot G (18 Lot Equivalent) $112 Outlot H (11 Lot Equivalent) $112 Outlot I ( 8 Lot Equivalent) $112. 134 Page 18. 0601c Total Assessment $ 896 3,247 1,008 1,120 1,120 896 1,120 1,456 2,016 1,232 896 • $ 15,005 • b) Lateral'Benefit from Trunk (Cont'd. Lot 1 -- -- 1 lot Assessable $ Total Parcel Description Front Footage Rate/FF Assessment William and Larue Addition $535/Lot $ 535 Block 1, Lot 1 179 $10.84(2) $ 1,940.36 Block 1, Lot 2 135 $10.84 1,463.40 Block 1, Lot 3 156 $10.84 1,691.04 Block 1, Lot 4 140 $10.84 1,517.60 St. Francis Wood - Outlot A 641.42(1) $17.87(3) 11,462.18 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 043-53 417.36 $10.84 $ 4,524.18 Parcel 044-53 242.64 $10.84 2,630.22 SE 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 012-76 604.36(1) $10.84 6.551.26 11 11 (1) Represents 502 of total front footage abutting Lexington Avenue. (2) Single Family Rate (3) Multiple Rate c. Trunk Area Area Credit Parcel Description (acre) (acre) Lexington Place South 50 Street -9.4 (Parcel 011-52) Pond -3.9 William 6 Larue Addition $31,780.24 Assessable Area Total (acre) Rate Assessment 36.7 $1,120/Ac. $41,104 Block 1, Lot 1 -- -- 1 lot $535/lot $ 535 Block 1, Lot 2 -- -- 1 lot $535/Lot $ 535 Block 1, Lot 3 -- -- 1 lot $535/lot $ 535 Block 1, Lot 4 -- -- 1 lot $535/lot $ 535 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 043-53 3.18 Street -0.64 2.54 $1,120/ac. $ 2,845 Parcel 044-53 6.82 Street -1.36 5.46 $1,120/ac. 6,115 TOTAL ......................... $52,204 0601c Page 19. c. Trunk Area (Cont'd.) Total • Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 8 $301 $ 2,454 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $307 8,896 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $307 2,761 Block 4, Lots 1-10 10 $307 3,067 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $307 3,067 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $307 2,454 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $307 3,067 Outlot F (13 Lot Equivalent) $307 3,988 Outlot G (18 Lot Equivalent) $307 5,522 Outlot H (11 Lot Equivalent) $307 3,374 Outlot I ( 8 Lot Equivalent) $307 2,454 134 $ 41,104 C. SERVICES a) Lexington Avenue Services Total Parcel Description No. of Services Cost/Service Assessment • William and Larue Addition Block 1, Lot 1 1 $1,882 $ 1,882 Block 1, Lot 2 1 $1,882 1,882 Block 1, Lot 3 1 $1,882 1,882 Block 1, Lot 4 1 $1,882 1,882 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 043-53 1 $1,882 $ 1,882 Parcel 044-53 1 $1,882 1,882 TOTAL ...................... $11,290 0601c Page 20. j47 • • b) Lexington Place South Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 8 $760 $ 6,081 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $760 22,044 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $760 6,841 Black 4, Lots 1-10 10 $760 7,601 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $760 7,601 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $760 6,081 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $760 7,601 Outlot F (13 Lot Equivalent) $760 9,882 Outlot C (18 Lot Equivalent) $760 13,683 Outlot H (11 Lot Equivalent) $760 8,362 Outlot I ( 8 Lot Equivalent) $760 6,082 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 044-53 (7 Lot Equivalent $760 $ 5,321 TOTAL ........... 141 $107,180 • D. STORM SEWER a) Lateral Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 a $1,198 $ 9,585 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $1,198 34,747 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $1,198 10,783 Block 4, Lots 1-10 10 $1,198 11,982 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $1,198 11,982 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 9,585 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 11,982 Outlot F (13 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 15,576 Outlot C (18 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 21,567 Outlot H (11 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 13,180 Outlot I ( 8 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 9,585 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 • Parcel 044-53 (7 lot equivalents) $1,198 $ 8,387 TOTAL .......... 141 $168,940 Page 21. 0601c b) Trunk Area 0601c Page 22. a 11 Assessable Area Credit Area Total Parcel Description (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) Rate Assessment Lexington Place South 2,178,000 Str. 410,770 1,599,530 $0.045/s.f. $71,979 Pond 167,700 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 043-53 138,690 Str. 27,740 110,950 $0.045 $ 4,993 Parcel 044-53 297,080 Str. 59,420 237,660 $0.045 10,695 TOTAL ........................................ $87,667 Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 8 $537 $ 4,298 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $537 15,578 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $537 4,834 Block 4, Lots 1-10 10 $537 5,371 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $537 5,371 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $537 4,297 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $537 5,372 Outlot F_ (13 Lot Equivalent) $537 6,983 Outlot C (18 Lot Equivalent) $537 9,669 Outlot H- (11 Lot Equivalent) $537 5,909 Outlot I (8 Lot Equivalent) $537 4,297 134 $ 71,979 0601c Page 22. a 11 is 0601c Page 23. 50 LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION. PROJECT NO: 404 A. SANITARY SEWER Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place 2nd Addition Block 1, Lot 1 16 $223 $ 3,561 Block 1, Lot 2 12 $223 2,671 Block 1, Lot 3 16 $223 3,561 Block 2, Lot 1 16 $223 3,562 Block 2, Lot 2 16 $223 3,562 Block 2, Lot 3 8 $223 1,781 Block 2, Lot 4 16 $223 3,561 Block 2, Lot 5 16 $223 3,561 TOTAL .......... 116 $25,820 • B. WATER MAIN a) Lateral Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place 2nd Addition Block 1, Lot 1 16 $400 $ 6,407 Block 1, Lot 2 12 $400 4,805 Block 1, Lot 3 16 $400 6,407 Block 2, Lot 1 16 $400 6,407 Block 2, Lot 2 16 $400 6,407 Block 2, Lot 3 8 $400 3,203 Block 2, Lot 4 16 $400 6,407 Block 2, Lot 5 16 $400 6,407 TOTAL .............. 116 $46,450 is 0601c Page 23. 50 n (1� Multiple Rate C. SERVICE b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Total • Parcel Description Total Parcel Description No. of Units Cost/Unit Assessment Lexington Place 2nd Addition (772 F.F. x $17.87/F.F. (1) _ $13,796) 1, Lot Block 1, Lot 1 16 $119 $ 1,903 Block 1, Lot 2 12 $119 1,427 Block 1, Lot 3 16 $119 1,903 Block 2, Lot 1 16 $119 1,903 Block 2, Lot 2 16 $119 1,903 Block 2, Lot 3 8 $119 951 Block 2, Lot 4 16 $119 1,903 Block 2, Lot 5 16 $119 1,903 Block TOTAL .............. 116 16 $13,796 (1� Multiple Rate C. SERVICE Total • Parcel Description No. of Units Cost/Unit Assessment Lexington Place 2nd Addition Block 1, Lot 1 16 $314 $ 5,022 Block 1, Lot 2 12 $314 3,767 Block 1, Lot 3 16 $314 5,022 Block 2, Lot 1 16 $314 5,022 Block 2, Lot 2 16 $314 5,022 Block 2, Lot 3 8 $314 2,511 Block 2, Lot 4 16 $314 5,022 Block 2, Lot 5 16 $314 5,022 TOTAL .............. 116 $36,410 0601c Page 24. .5 1 • • D. STORM SEWER • • 0601c Page 25. S.L Total Parcel Description No. of Units Cost/Unit Assessment Lexington Place 2nd Addition Block 1, Lot 1 16 $192 $ 3,073 Block 1, Lot 2 12 $192 2,305 Block 1, Lot 3 16 $192 3,073 Block 2, Lot 1 16 $192 3,073 Block 2, Lot 2 16 $192 3,073 Block 2, Lot 3 8 $192 1,537 Block 2, Lot 4 16 $192 3,073 Block 2, Lot 5 16 $192 3,073 TOTAL .............. 116 $22,280 • • 0601c Page 25. S.L SUMMARY PROJECT NO. 404 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL COST/LOT, UNIT, PARCEL Water Main Storm Sewer Sanitary Lateral Trunk Services Sewer Benefit Total Parcel Description Lateral Lateral From Trunk Area Lateral Lateral Trunk Assessment Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 $ 2,045 $1,057 $ 112 $ 307 $ 760 $1,198 $ 537 $ 6,016.00 Block 2, Lots 1-29 $ 2,045 1,057 $ 112 307 760 1,198 '537 6,016.00 Block 3, Lots 1-9 $ 2,045 1,057 $ 112 307 760 1,198 537 6,016.00 Block 4, Lots 1-10 $ 2,045 1,057 $ 112 307 760 1,198 537 6,016.00 Block 5, Lots 1-10 $ 2,045 1,057 $ 112 307 760 1,198 537 6,016.00 Outlot D $16,367 8,454 $ 896 2,454 6,081 9,585 4,297 48,134.00 Outlot E $20,458 10,568 $1,120 3,067 7,601 11,982 5,372 60,168.00 Outlot F $26,597 13,739 $1,456 3,988 9,882 15,576 6,983 78,221.00 Outlot C $36,826 19,023 $2,016 5,521 13,683 21,567 9,669 108,305.00 Outlot H $22,508 11,625 $1,232 3,374 8,362 13,180 5,909 66,190.00 Outlot I $16,367 8,454 $ 896 2,454 6,082 9,585 4,297 48,135.00 Lexington Place 2nd Addition Block 1, Lot 1 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 1, Lot 2 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 1, Lot 3 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ .192 -- $ 1,248 Block 2, Lot 1 _$ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 2, Lot 2 $ 223 $ 400 $' 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 2, Lot 3 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 2, Lot 4 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 2, Lot 5 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 sic 41ge • 26. 0 (Continued) William and Larue Addition Block 1, Lot 1 -- Block 1, Lot 2 -- Block 1,,Lot 3 -- Block 1, Lot 4 -- St. Francis Wood OUTLOT A -- SW 1/4, SECTION 14 SUMMARY PROJECT NO. 404 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL COST/LOT, UNIT, PARCEL -- $1,940.36 $ 535 $1,882 -- -- $ 4,357.36 -- $1,463.40 $ 535 $1,882 -- -- $ 3,880.40 -- $1,691.04 $ 535 $1,882 -- -- $ 7,988.44 -- $1,517.60 $ 535 $1,882 -- -- $ 3,934.60 $11,462.18 -- -- -- -- $11,462.18 Parcel 030-53 $ 3,275 $:3,275.00 Parcel 041-53 $ 3,275 $ 3,275.00 Parcel 043-53 $ 4,524.18 $2,845 $1,882 $ 4,993 $14,244.18 Parcel 044-53 $14,321 $7,398 $ 2,630.22 $6,115 $7,203 $8,387 $10,695$56,749.22 SE 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 012-76 0601c $ 6,551.26 -- Page 27. -- -- -- $ 6,551.26 W � � O O O Q O t— Y1 2! 4 5 4 7 9 910` I O U 0• \ Ua TL1P Olf'rL,„C � % N O50 -Ss W O I 3 2 1 3 z 1 \ \ S 29 2 7O \ WTLOT A 5 28 3 I S 9 7 27 3 !/ O;L LdT 1 I I I I 1 1 I IG' I 041-53 2e , O 70 25 9 z4 7 B 9 10 z3 9 1 II 22 9 ' _L_L _L_L_l-i_, 19 IS 12 0 10 B.T —= 7 LOT EOUIV4 LENT 030-55 PROPOSED 20 19 _ — 044- 33 LEXINGTON SQUARE' Is 19 n 18 I 2 OVTLOT C 1-0. 'O WILLIAMS LARUE ADD. 3 F �— O — 043.53 1 1 2 3 4 9 9 1 6 5 LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO. 43 ) ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD. 012.79 LATERAL BENEFIT FROM SEWER RATE/F. F. if CORNER LOT CREDIT 150 FT LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER -qrll� F NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK d ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date: MAY, 1984 PRO♦J. NO. COMM. 49306 404 NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers EAGAN, MINNESOTA St. Paul, Minn. WATER MAIN Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO. _[COMM. 49306 404 .-<4 W p O O O O cr Y I 3 4 3 6 7 6 a O O v 7 h�T Ei �O L � 0fflZ oso•ss N O dT/ 1 s z 1 1 i % ; \\ 3 ' 29 E i OUTLOT 4 5 26 y/}u7T 5 6 27 4 T, 0� 7 6 Ool-SS 25 i 6 I G I I 6 25 6 �O r a 24 r 6 . 10 25 6 II Y I I 1413 12 21 10= 7LOT EQUIVALENT 030-53 ' I 20 044-33 _ IS IB 17 IB IY I OUTLOT C ~ J F WILLIAMS 6 LARUE DO. I 3 3 O .013-53 1 2 3 4 • i s e7e s ® 0 6.r 1B" -- mlivLawlamm I LEXINGTON AVE. (C0. R0. NO.43 ) ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD. 012 •76 LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT RESIDENTIAL RATE ®®® COMMERCIAL HIGH DENSITY RATE NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers EAGAN, MINNESOTA St. Paul, Minn. WATER MAIN Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO. _[COMM. 49306 404 .-<4 W LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO. 43 ) ST. FRANCIS W000 ADD. TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATER MAIN TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT !; 7 012-76 NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET 0 SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers • St. Paul, Minn. Date: MAY. 19841r PROJ. NO. COMM. 49306 1 404 n L "Im oQ Dan.If�� 3 • 1 4 J 9 e T e a 9 101 1a�o POND JP -050. OOTTLOT A i L 90 i d 1 7LOT EOUIVAL ENT = 044-53 O 0_ —2- 0 043.53 4 5 O, T L S a 1f \110/ 7 I OUTLOT C 1r LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO.43 ) ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD. NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGANF MINNESOTA STORM SEWER 0 0 050-53 vvi W 3 041-53 030-53 ILLI MS a LARUE DO 1 x 1 s 4 012-76 I\ . ERISTINO OPEN BWALE POND JP -11 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK d ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: MAY, 19Ra pROJ. NO. Comm. a9ao5 404 O` O Q OI O Y u r� I Ll LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD. ® AREA ASSESSMENT ,*40.43) LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER AREA ASSESSMENT rr9 012 -7e NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET Pi 11 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLM III, ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting E"Ineers • St. Paul. Minn. Oats: MAY. 1984 PROJ. NO. COMM. 49306 1 404 0 • ASSESSMENT AREA NORTH o. zqo SCALE IN IN FEET LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION • UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER 66 BLUE JAY WAY LEXINGTON AVEACO.RO.NO. w E 0 0 0 0 3 Y U 7 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Data: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO. Comm, 49306 Ir 404 J LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION BLUE JAY WAY ASSESSMENT AREA LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT ® COMMERCIAL HIGH DENSITY RATE NORTH LEXINGTON AVE. (C0. RD. NO.43 ) 0 200 1 SCALE IN FEET LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATER MAIN 41 • BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. • Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO. Comm. 49305 dnd `v � 'i tlNlts ::t IS ttW�f? � S i In t�uNKs .t n� ASSESSMENT AREA NORTH 0 !00 SCALE IN FEET I LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION BLUE JAY WAY LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO.43 ) LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER G L I C 9 SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK i ASSOCIATES, INC. ComWting EngMeere St. Paul. Minn. Data: MAY. 198 PROD. NO. Comm. 49306 1i 404 i Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Seventeen • • PROJECT 400/LIFT STATION/FORCE MAIN OUTLET B. Project 400, Oak Cliff Pond (Lift Station and Force Main Outlet -- In response to a petition received from the developer of the Oak Cliff Addition, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report to install the lift station and force main outlet for the pond located in the center of this subdivision. On May 1, the completed feasiblity report was presented to the Council for their review and scheduling of the public hearing to be held on June 5. Enclosed on pages _ (�_ through i/ is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's review during this public hearing. A copy of the feasibility report has been sent to the developer for his review. In addition, notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections or comments pertaining to this proposed project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 400 for the installation of a storm sewer lift station and force main outlet to the Oak Cliff pond. G3 0 0 REPORT ON OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10) TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET PROJECT NO. 400 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE N0. 49303 /�o.redt:oa, Rodme, 4m&*" a 44j"ia", Inc. 61, i 36 SL. P..c M....r. 33113 P".- 612-636-4600 May 3, 1984 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Oak Cliff Pond (AP -10) Trunk Storm Sever Outlet Project 400 Our File No. 49303 Dear Mayor and Council: 0tc. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. A'mh A. Gmd.n Themm E'. Nor Rchort w.'R Repro G. &1h ... M. P.E. M.n. L. So b. P.E. Lo..ld C. &Wry 1. P.E. fmy A. Bourton, P E. Mark A. H... P.E. rm K. FWU. P.E. .MRbrl T. Fnlm.nn, P.E. Raba R. Pl�pmr. P.F. D..d L. A... P. E. Ch.d. A. Emkm. L. M. P.w . H.Mn .V. Own Transmitted herewith is our report for Oak Cliff Pond Outlet, Project 400. This report covers trunk storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a • mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC. _�Ira4z a --Z', I I -,I � Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct super- vision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under 'the laws of the State of Minnesota. YGit Mark A. Hanson, P.E. i Date: May 3, 1984 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works • Date: 6Jr G. P.E. o 01 Rn 1.. R W. Rohn W. Ron M, P.E. A.dr, k, P.E. B. fd d A. 4mbn, P. E. Rmb E. r.mr. P.E. loon C. Ghon. P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. A'mh A. Gmd.n Themm E'. Nor Rchort w.'R Repro G. &1h ... M. P.E. M.n. L. So b. P.E. Lo..ld C. &Wry 1. P.E. fmy A. Bourton, P E. Mark A. H... P.E. rm K. FWU. P.E. .MRbrl T. Fnlm.nn, P.E. Raba R. Pl�pmr. P.F. D..d L. A... P. E. Ch.d. A. Emkm. L. M. P.w . H.Mn .V. Own Transmitted herewith is our report for Oak Cliff Pond Outlet, Project 400. This report covers trunk storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a • mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC. _�Ira4z a --Z', I I -,I � Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct super- vision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under 'the laws of the State of Minnesota. YGit Mark A. Hanson, P.E. i Date: May 3, 1984 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works • Date: 6Jr • SCOPE: This project includes the construction of trunk storm sewer which will provide an outlet for Oak Cliff Pond. Oak Cliff Pond is designated as Pond AP -10 in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. Oak Cliff Pond is located west of Slaters Road and south of Cliff Road (Co. Rd. No. 32). FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one con- tract. DISCUSSION: Trunk storm sewer proposed herein includes providing an outlet for Oak Cliff Pond (AP -10). Trunk storm sewer includes a submersible lift station located -on the south side of Oak Cliff Pond as shown on the attached drawing. The lift station will include two 115 gallon per minute pumps at 5.0 • horsepower each. Also included is a 4" diameter force main which will convey storm water from Pond AP -10 to Pond AP -10A. A 12" diameter gravity storm • sewer will convey storm water from Pond AP -LOA to an existing 24" diameter storm sewer in Slaters Road at James Street. Pond AP -10B located directly west of Slaters Road at James Street will discharge directly into the 12" di- ameter gravity storm sewer from Pond AP-IOA. Access to the lift station will be provided by constructing a 12' wide gravel drive from Slaters Road across Outlet C. It is assumed for purposes of this report that Slaters Road will be open cut for storm sewer construction. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Assessment Area Oak Cliff Addition Outlot B, C, D, E, F Page. 1. 0661c 64 0 COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $98,080 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 27.5% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Storm sewer included herein is trunk. Trunk area assessments for storm sewer have been previously assessed under Project No. 186 for this area. However, the assessment amount was determined at the agriculture (single—family) rate. Since that time the zoning classifications for certain outlots within Oak Cliff Addition have been defined under the Winkler/Jackson Planned Unit Development Agreement. It is therefore proposed to assess those Outlots at the 1984 rate for their present zoning less the 1984 rate for the zoning at which they were previously assessed (agricultural). Trunk rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: • Single Family $0.045/sq.ft. Multiple Rate $0.057/sq.ft. Commercial $0.068/sq.ft. REVENUE: Revenue to cover the cost of this project is as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance STORM SEWER Trunk $98,080 Trunk Area Assessment $27,963 $98,080 $27,963 —$70,117 The estimated trunk fund balance is —$70,117. It is assumed this amount will be the responsibility of the trunk storm sewer fund. • Page 2. 0661c 47 0 • • PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report May 1, 1984 Public Hearing June 5, 1984 Approve Plans and Specifications June 5, 1984 Open Bids June 29, 1984 Award Contract July 3, 1984 Construction Completion Fall, 1984 Final Assessment Hearing Spring, 1985 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Spring, 1986 0661c Page 3. No' APPENDIX A • PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10) TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET PROJECT NO. 400 500 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sever in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. $ 13,000 2 Each Std. 4' dia. MH v/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each 2,000 LUMP SUM Lift Station No. 1 @ $37,100.00/L.S. 37,100 10 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than '8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 6,000 450 Lin.ft. 4" DIP Force main @ $10.00/lin.ft. 4,500 ' LUMP SUM Gravel access drive @ $3,500.00/L.S. 3,500 150 Sq.yds. Bituminous mixture for patch @ $20.00/sq.yd. 3,000 30 Lin.ft. Concrete curb b gutter @ $15.00/lin.ft. 450 • 2.0 Acres Seed v/mulch b fertilizer @ $2,000.00/acre 4,000 - Total $73,550 +52 Contingencies 3,680 $77,230 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 20,850 TOTAL ............................................. $98,080 1 Page 4. 0661c APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10) TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET PROJECT NO. 400 • 0661c 0 Page 5. 76 Assessable Parcel Present Area Credit Area Total Description Zoning (sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate/sq.ft. Assessment OAK CLIFF ADDITION Outlot B. Multiple 549,600 Pond 224,000 260,480 $0.012 $ 3,125 Str. 65,120 OutIot C Multiple 387,200 Pond 59,200 262,400 0.012 3,149 Str. 65,600 • Outlot D Commercial 345,600 Str. 69,120 276,480 0.023 6,359 Outlot E -Commercial 394,800 Str. 78,960 315,840 0.023 7,264 Outlot F Commercial 438,400 Str. 87,680 350,720 0.023 8,066 TOTAL .............................. $27,963 • 0661c 0 Page 5. 76 C. S. A. H. NO. 32 4a1� \�S RAVEL ACCESS ROAD OAK CLIFF POND AP -'10 ' N.W.L. 919.7 H.W.L. 924.0 LIFT STATION 4" FORCEMAIN POND AP-IOA N.W.L. 946.0 i H.W.L. 946.7 m' 0.5 AC. FT. I POND AP -108 N.W.L. 945.0 JAMES ST. H.W.L. 948.5 \2 2.0 AC. FT. 0 400 SCALE IN FEET TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT ® COMMERCIAL RATE ® MULTIPLE RATE OAK CLIFF POND ( AP -10 ) TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK Q ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers • St. Paul. Minn. EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: MAY, 1984 F'KUJ. 1 11 Comm.49303 11 400 yellL Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Eighteen PROJECT 398/STREETS 8 UTILITIES C. Project 398, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Streets B Utilities) -- On May 15, the City Council opened a public hearing to discuss the feasibility of installing streets and utilities to service the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition under Project 398. During that public hearing, the developer requested that the scope of the project be reduced from what was originally requested and anticipated due to current market conditions. Subsequently, the City Council continued the public hearing until June 5 and ordered the feasibil- ity report to be revised to incorporate the scope of the project intended to be developed under the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Therefore, enclosed on pages _73 through _0 is a copy of the "revised" feasibility report for Project 398 relating to the final plat configuration previously discussed by the City Council under the final plat application of the Consent Agenda for the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Because this is a continua- tion of the public hearing held on May 15 and the revised report did not incorporate any additional properties that were not previously included in the original report, no additional notifica- tions were published in the legal newspaper. However, a copy • of the revised feasibility report has been provided to the developer for his information prior to the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 398 for the installation of streets and utilities for the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. • _7z 0 REPORT Con SUN CLIFF 2nd ADDITION UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO.398 REVISED EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE N0.49300 BmeA&042, /tOdelie, lgmd," ii 9 rgddociated, Jnc. e :,q'e 73 Baxe�ww ��ww.�.ww u�_''I` �//����� �/� &iewe, y'7 yQ,pC{�,(,�',Y ,B�('. Gh R. COW. P.E. £nlh A. Car P.E. Y ala G. Bonru.Oo, P.E. . IA0.6 NO.a. P.G R'. R.. P.E. R'M M'. Fawn. P.E. Ja h C. AM1111A. P.E. RO G. &h.wh'. P.E. 2335 W/. 7WA WVA..? 36 B.. Pm A. P.E. M.rv,. L. SO A.. P.E. Sl. P..r All. .-,- 55.fm ft&M E. Turns. P.E. D ..&C. B.,V d,. P.E. J.m C. OLo.. P.L. Jfny A. Bo.NO., P.L. PA... 612.636-4600 Mm* A. H.., P.E. TN K. F . P.E M~ F. P.E. RO R. fy Jfj e. P.F Oa.E LaY O... P.E. April 16, 1984 Ch A. Enrlan lAa M. Po.H,IY ' Habn M. Olm. Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mo. 55121 Re: Sun Cliff 2nd Addition Utility b Street Improvements Project No. 398 - Revised File No. 49300 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Sun Cliff 2nd Addition Utility and Street Improvements, Project 398. This report covers utility and street im- provements to service Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. • We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROA, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the tate of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: April 16, 1984 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by Phoma.9AC-olbert, P.E. Director of Public Works • Date: .j � y Y 0368c / • SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer and streets to service the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Sun Cliff 2nd Addition is located south of Co. Rd. 30, between Beaver Dam Road and Blackhawk Road and includes 81 single family lots. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out in one contract. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes 8 inch diameter lat- eral sanitary sewers to properly service the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Sun Cliff 2nd Addition will be served by laterals constructed within the pro- posed streets at a proper depth to service the abutting lots. All sewers in • this project will connect to sewers in the Sun Cliff 1st Addition. Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes 6 inch diameter laterals and a 16 inch trunk water main to properly service the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addi- • tion. A 16 inch diameter trunk water main was constructed under Project 317 in the west boulevard of Blackhawk Road from Co. Rd. 30 to a point 1,850 feet south of Co. Rd. 30. This trunk main would be extended to the south limits of Sun Cliff 2nd Addition as a part of this project. Lateral water mains pro- posed herein will connect to water mains in Sun Cliff lot Addition as well as the previously mentioned trunk water main on Blackhawk Road. Also included are the required number of valves and hydrants. Services - Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed 15 feet beyond the property line. Service lines are proposed to be 4 inch diame- ter for sanitary sewer and 1 inch diameter for water. Page 1. 0368c %S Storm Sewer - The storm sewer holding pond' designated as Pond AP -7 is located • at the northeast corner of future Suri Cliff Additions. It is proposed to ex- tend an 18 inch diameter storm sewer from the Sun Cliff 1st Addition through the 2nd Addition. This storm sewer will serve portions of the 2ndAddition and will be extended to provide an outlet to Pond AP -7 when future Sun Cliff Additions are developed. Also included is a lateral storm sewer which will convey drainage from Fox Ridge Court to Pond AP -23. The outlet for Pond AP -23 will be constructed by Mn/DOT as part of I -35E to an existing storm sewer in Rahn Road. Street - Street construction proposed herein includes construction of a 32 foot wide street constructed to a 7 ton residential design thickness'with sur- mountable concrete 'curb and gutter in conjunction with the required restora- tion for boulevards. It is assumed that grading of the streets will be done by the developer prior to the start of this project. • AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA N 1/2 SECTION 29 Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Parcel 014-28) Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Parcel 012-09) COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: Sanitary Sever $ 85,860 Water Main 120,270 Services 68,850 Storm Sever 41,310 Street 177,390 TOTAL ............. $493,680 • Page 2. 0368c 76 The total estimated project cost is $493,680 which includes contingencies • and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 27% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. Trunk area sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer have been previously assessed to this area as a part of Project 236. SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the cost of the new lateral sanitary severs for this project equally to all the lots in the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. WATER MAIN: Water main proposed herein is separated into trunk and lateral water main. It is proposed to assess a lateral benefit from trunk for half the length of the 16 inch trunk water main along Blackhawk Road. The remain- ing costs associated with the 16 inch trunk main will be the responsibility of • the trunk fund. It is proposed to assess the cost of the lateral water main and the lateral benefit from the trunk main equally to all the lots in Sun • Cliff 2nd Addition. SERVICES: It is proposed that all services be 4 inch sever and 1 inch water services and that they extend 15 feet into the property. It is proposed to assess the total cost of the services equally to all the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the cost of the new lateral storm sewer equally to all the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. STREET: Street construction proposed herein is to be assessed equally to all the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. Trunk rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: 0368c Page 3. 77 LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK Lateral benefit from a trunk water main ......... $21.68 centerline ft. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: A.) SANITARY SEWER Lateral Lateral Assessment 8.) WATER MAIN. Lateral Trunk Lateral Assessment Lateral Benefit from Trunk C.) SERVICES Lateral Lateral Assessment D.) STORM SEWER Lateral Lateral Assessment Project Cost $ 85,860 $ 85,860 $ 82,698 37,572 $ 68,850 $ 68,850 $ 41,310 Page 4. 0368c 79 Revenue Balance $ 85,860 $ 85,860 - 0 - $ 82,698 4,762 $ 87,460 -$32,810 $ 68,850 $ 68,850 $ 41,310 $ 41,310 - 0 - 0 • • E.) STREET • Lateral Lateral Assessment • • $177,390 $177,390 $177,390 $177,390 - 0 - TOTAL ................ -$32,810 The total estimated trunk fund balance for this project is -$32,810 which will be the responsibility of the trunk water fund. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report June 5, 1984 Public Hearing. . June 5, 1984 Approve Plans and Specifications June 5, 1984 Open Bids July 2, 198,+ Award Contract July 3, 1984 Construction Completion Fall, 1984 Final Assessment Hearing Winter, 1985 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1986 0368c Page 5. 79 B.) WATER MAIN 900 Lin.ft. APPENDIX A $ 23,400 3,800 • 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $11.00/lin.ft. 41,800 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE Each Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each 6,300 1 Each SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION 1,800 10 Each Resilient wedge gate valve b box in pl, @ $350.00/ea, 3,500 PROJECT NO. 398 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 5,200 A.) SANITARY SEWER Each Connect to Ex. 16" DIP @ $400.00/each 400 3,000 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer, 10'-15' dp, in pl, @ $13.00/l.f. $ 39,000 Cu.yds. 14 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each Lin.ft. 12,600 4,700 50 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp, in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft. $ 90,190 3,000 4 Lin.ft. Outside drop for MH in pl. @ S150.00/lin.ft. 600 $ 94,700 30 Lin.ft. 4" CISP Service riser in pl. @ $10.00/lin.ft. 25,570 • 300 84 Each 8"x4" wye in pl. @ $40.00/each 3,360 222.5 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,225 3,000 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 3,000 1 Each Connect to existing MH @ $300.00/each 300 Total $ 64,385 +5X Contingencies 3,220 $ 67,605 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 18,255 • A.) TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................. $ 85,860 B.) WATER MAIN 900 Lin.ft. 16" DIP Water main in pl. @ $26.00/lin,ft. $ 23,400 3,800 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $11.00/lin.ft. 41,800 7 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each 6,300 1 Each 16" Butterfly valve 6 box in pl, @ $1,800.00/each 1,800 10 Each Resilient wedge gate valve b box in pl, @ $350.00/ea, 3,500 4,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 5,200 1 Each Connect to Ex. 16" DIP @ $400.00/each 400 2 Each Connect to Ex. 6" DIP @ $300.00/each 600 249 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,490 4,700 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 4,700 Total $ 90,190 +52 Contingencies 4,510 $ 94,700 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest 25,570 • B.) TOTAL WATER MAIN ................................ $120,270 Page 6. 0368c • 5.) SERVICES 3,600 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer service in pl. @ $6.00/lin.ft. 3,600 Lin.ft. 1" Type "K" copper water service in pl. @ $5.10/L.f. 82 Each 1" Corporation stop in pl. @ $20.00/each 82 Each 1" Curb atop b box in pl. @ $70.00/each 4,290 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies • • +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest C.) TOTAL SERVICES ................................. D.) STORM SEWER 650 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-15' dp. in pl. @ $26.00/1.£. 260 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp, in pl. @ $19.00/lin.ft. 3 Each Std. 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. in pl. @ $950.00/each 2 Each CB w/cstg. in pl. @ $800.00/each 20 Lin.ft. MH Depth greater than 8' dp. in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 1 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard in pl. @ $540.00/ea. . 4 Cu.yds. Rip rap in pl. @ $50.00/cu.yd. 84 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 910 .Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1 Acres Seed with mulch in pl. @ $1,000.00/Ac. 0368c Total +5% Contingencies $ 21,600 18,360 1,640 5,740 4.290 $ 51,630 2,580 $ 54,210 14.640 $ 68,850 $ 16,900 4,940 2,850 1,600 1,200 540 200 840 910 1,000 S 30,980 1,550 $ 32,530 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 8,780 D.) TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................ $ 41,310 Page 7. I E.) STREET TOTAL • 1,200 Cu.yda. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. $ 3,600 600 Cu.yds. Select Granular borrow @ $4.50/cu.yd. 2,700 13,960 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $0.25/sq.yd. 3,490 4,600 Tons Cl. 5 100% crushed quarry rock in pl. @ $7.00/ton 32,200 1,150 Tons 2331 Bituminous base course in pl. @ $11.00/ton 12,650 1,150 Tons 2341 Bituminous wear course in pl. @ $12.00/ton 13,800 130 Tons Bituminous material for mixture in pl. @ $200.00/ton 26,000 600 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat in pl. @ $1.20/gal. 720 6,900 Lin.ft. Surmoutable concrete curb and gutter in pl. @ $4.50/l.f. 31,050 1,860 Lin.ft. Reinforcing for concrete C. b G. in pl. @ $1.00/l.f. 1,860 18 Each Adjust MH or CB frame @ $120:00/each 2,160 8 Each Adjust GV box @ $100.00/each 800 2 Acres Seed w/mulch in pl. @ $1,000.00/Ac. 2,000 Total $133,030 +5% Contingencies 6,650 $139,680 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest 37,710 • E.) TOTAL STREET ................................... ..$177,390 0368c A. TOTAL SANITARY SEWER $ 85,860 B. TOTAL WATER MAIN I 120,270 C. TOTAL SERVICES . 68,850 D. TOTAL STORM SEWER 41;310 E. TOTAL STREET 177,390 TOTAL ................... $493,680 Page 8. �'v2' • APPENDIX B • PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION PROJECT NO. 398 A. SANITARY•SEWER u Page 9. 0368c �3 No. of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost N 1/2, SECTION 29 SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $1,060 $ 24,380 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 '$1,060 12,720 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $1,060 20,140 Block 4, Lots 1 6 2 2 $1,060 2,120 Block 5, Lot 1 1 $1,060 1,060 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $1,060 25,440 TOTAL 81 $ 85,860 B. WATER MAIN • No, of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost 1) LATERALS SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $1,021 $ 23,482 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 $1,021 12,252 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $1,021 19,398 Block 4, Lots 1 & 2 2 $1,021 2,042 Block 5, Lot 1 1 $1,021 1,021 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $1,021 24,503 TOTAL 148 (1) $ 82,698 u Page 9. 0368c �3 2) LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK (439.33' @ $10.84/FF - $4,762) C. SERVICES No. of Lots Cost/Lot No. of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $59 '$1,352 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 $59 706 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $59 1,117 Block 4, Lots 1 6 2 2 $59 118 Block 5, Lots 1 1 $59 59 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $59 1,410 81 $4,762 C. SERVICES Page 10. 0368c / �f E • No. of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $850 $ 19,550 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 $850 10,200 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $850 16,150 Block 4, Lots 1 & 2 2 $850 1,700 Block 5, Lots 1 1 $850 850 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $850 20,400 TOTAL 148 .$ 68,850 D. STORM SEWER No. of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $510 $ 11,730 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 $510 6,120 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $510 9,690 Block 4, Lots 1 6 2 2 $510 1,020 Block 5, Lots 1 1 $510 510 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $510 12,240 TOTAL 81 $ 41,310 Page 10. 0368c / �f E • • E. STREET No. of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $2,190 $ 50,370 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 $2,190 26,280 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $2,190 41,610 Block 4, Lots 1 6 2 2 $2,190 4,380 Block 5, Lots 1 1 $2,190 2,190 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $2,190 52,560 TOTAL 81 $177,390 • 0368c Page 11. P5 PROJECT 398 - REVISED SUMMARY COST/LOT 0368c Page 12. 0 • Sanitary Lateral Ben- Storm, Legal Sever Water efit from Sever Total Description Lateral Lateral Water Main Services Lateral Street Cost/Lot SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,690 Block 2, Lots 1-12 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,690 Block 3, Lots 1-19 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,690 Block 4, Lots 1 & 2 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,690 Block 5, Lots 1 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,690 Block 6, Lots 1-24 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,60 0368c Page 12. 0 • C, SUN C1 F -F 2nd ADDITION UTUITY s &THEM UAPROvwcmm PROJMT NOZ98 REVISED EAGA_N, MUTNESOTA SANITARY SEWER a Nil . .., 2" ,... cor w .9300 i I //I Nil . .., 2" ,... cor w .9300 ® LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK SUN CLIFF 2nd ADDITION UTUJTT • STPAW ntmvntwra PROD= No.m RMww RAGAN, MINNESOTA WATER MAIN Dl�! Y� il• �� �. GD' no -9i00 L • 0 0 0 9 SUN CLIFF tad ADDITION l Tu2rT k mm MIROVtMMM PROJBUT MOMS REVISED FAGAN, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER �r �a mss■ • NmL OL i i pit[ ". [., .9[• EOr� W 1[]00 MUINEWTA STREETS • W"- w B. l... ms .0. ""a 0 II • Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Nineteen • • VACATE UTILITY EASEMENT/LAKESIDE ESTATES D. Vacate Utility Easement, Lakeside Estates -- On May 1, the City Council received a petition for the vacation of a drainage and utility easement over Lots 3 and 13, Block 1, Lakeside Estates, and subsequently scheduled a public hearing to be held on June 5. Enclosed on page is a location map referencing the utility easements to be vacated. As can be seen, these utility easements are centered down the referenced lots due to the previous lot split which has since been rescinded and these lots have now reverted to their original configuration. Notification of this drainage and utility easement vacation has been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected private utility companies. As of this date, the staff has not received any objection to this proposed vacation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED -ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny. the vacation of drainage and utility easements over Lots 3 and 13, Block 1, Lakeside Estates. 9/ ' .. - - fes.. t . �! T --: r•.-� �{•� � '6..^ •i�� (�. .a4trs �� at•te ♦.. wo i PART OF �A��•: .Cl. • _ PART OF 010-82 �. b010'62 �' \ -•r -.. a PO My d Ealoo PARK Iw• rm ma., ..ew1 010-00 ,a PROPOSED VAC TIONS _9_ •'�j',I1011IslillgsI,' e, dw � _ ■ ro �`F� _ � dry 4 4 •: , t a •ae. �� r • b • bxr • neo S a � f' ' ATLAN7 •ran _ ,•. \ V ' e�•.w, •i' ` •I f -0 a• £MILL '•e to 1• .. 11 ` (� w�b ORIV •.w rb • r!a •/•'Z`\ •d y' d.. ' •' _,� ✓` E b All�4IsI,, Iwo •Nj °° ni' Nom/ ''y"�¢ • dr ~• Coy c • m ree ajO - • 10 +F' my : we. • _ i �YV• 4 t _ 1 $' • G9 all -� • t .w wo 'm S,U : 1• 8 If .'? �- O}n5 �•. to L. n., .j .:..�: \r �_ 41 • ••°ertr. J •W rm •b r•r • • 8 •.a• . m•u.i .a ! :I8 d !1 p n Is Is Is Is ONO ati _ � • �� '`�� b Iwo 020-00'Pp•� •'a_•, "'m-�.` t ♦: - \ � � � pP�• u:•'- :. .,:_ a a_ w:V?•:' Y - .r. Q120-011 " ;4 NORTH ant GREENLEAF ^ro ��d woo e•an 6 ti ' ♦h 1 s v Qi 1 noo uao to re •-1111, u.n atb Q r ��oz •S. r•• ♦. SRM y$ o E w• F q _ ; 13D-01 0 �. �. i .zw 6W _ it O b-' • _ • • Y Q N m • N g• LO 1� ! ;S =_ - Agenda Information June 5, 1984, City • Page Twenty Memo Council Meeting VACATE STREET EASEMENT/TWIN VIEW MANOR 2ND ADDITION E. Vacate Street Easement, Twin View Manor 2nd Addition -- When the Twin View Manor 2nd Addition was developed, Richard's Court did not have access to Cliff Road by way of Thomas Lane which was to be platted as a part of the Walden Heights lst Addition. Subsequently, as a part of the development agreement, the City required the developer to install a temporary road access from Richard's Court out to Cliff Road across a street easement over the west 50 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Twin View Manor 2nd Addition. With the subsequent platting of Walden Heights lst Addition and the construction of Thomas Lane and a portion of Richard's Court during 1983, this street easement is no longer necessary. Therefore, the staff initiated the public hearing to vacate this street easement so that the developer can remove the temporary access road and develop the lot in its platted residential manner. All notices of this public hearing have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected public and private utilities. Due to the fact that there are existing public and private utilities within this area, it is recommended that the vacation be approved for street access only and that all public utility and dr inage easements • be retained as necessary. Enclosed on page 4!is a location map showing the street easement vacation to be considered at this public hearing. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of a street easement over Lot 1, Block 1, Twin View Manor 2nd Addition. ,�3 61 !' OZ > a P\.vdct�.m I g�e� 'j I IZ 81�Jpor-';I (i`T plL15^ LI N II f O i _ — _ _ — — — SZ ZI gl 14 - . •`OY Ql l CItY of . is .7 r 18 B: L. . L__••Sd._.11: WALDEN E HEIGHTS °°°" 1 :.�....•�.,�. RK .�Oy,wIS_-••ee w,1� men— 'tY--':i:�y' r-•;oo.S• •C;I . a'^'� 'mm 1 bam� 1�- II ',w•i°rry ie 6�iY a-`� 1 C51_ •I e •iu1 N \ DI �' Gci) kir •.eat__ •vow (\ I1" E;Y I �, Ij '�� dIS6 0 A 3AItl0 r iv^ •'' ( kn} r-` •., g 5 S rT•- �._ }l 11 0. v / I I � I r, � Y\ .\ I a B �F� � q Y f j@tiR1 rY&'�1/I+�1W.v• p.?a°j 1` 11 11 �8 a y\' 6 i/� I II gI1I \la �1�0. �' n \'9 �•i)' �l•_� a •- J •�'2 i. SII .�rrri'• 91 p.j3 I� 1 91 9 JIxLy� -JIB x114 t;\ b I`N,y) p _ /J•�'�{a�'N.' I1� •�� /•,6 Itlw � '� 4d� � f„r:,e�� "'hb"( a�;+•�!�" �II rna•d.Iwd-4r�'J:�'9, / 1 116,,.�� �` I✓r�_ _ I' II f1 II 11 I1 ♦l;+• tyvi� \i _Ji._mulfregla°�l._ Y�f �.r'N� ,a -�•T 7.__e1 r�.,b s•rJ �. svi• _ J I_ aa�1 J 1-- � J ew 1 � . 6 � �•a �•-.� r. •�T /gv r on�rpj I ` °i; � 8r q rm wn :. rw iam'. nmdao 'uao __r '44d ..i—�. ter: s�••'.. G .1 / ) J a b��C rm .. 00 ,:.J •�� . f ', i n• tl wr � i y a'( �>%P ("EOia \II / I.. ' 1• •s {Ir7� -�tpi4Ko� — IT •-I ',. �_ Y IQ\N��.� N p N 1•,r ' 1.� 4 1 8 ♦�� 8 � i•4tyLvl rw�-lf mw -1 P�•"adol��lai'0'\`\ Z +�\.1r�I,�� q {�_ Gaaya 1i�� �1 F • -d 8 N • .R W • �8 A 1 I OI N fosm N Y ✓ ., dG L Ig 1 a£af � I w'•751#d •IN CD.0 rBCI IY S b l_�P_o8�1111 I ° �Y ��\.•^n// II 71\ /Iti`~�Iron I I' nm •arr 7rl _ JL L evl J8_ ZOT D a '• RICHA LANE 1 --e ro'ri •ee w- 1° _ • m• •1q -.0 u n rr•ro' em u• w n• 1w 1.. Iar • 2 `l . � __ /-[y`/--'rii r• — AI$ '11�'/��(+_y I" 9 e C O d d n e , �_ D • V C..•..,_7^maw mid O� .i ,oro �L. r •eW fv t l >1 %'6 •rte @'LY a 99v m. • 1; •ruuS � + 4 ` r '. Ot i /Y •W.M •'iy��� 4 n r a .iJ`• n ii1L %.tear d O • � ,A � qaJ d SF a • Y I w•r• q salts 8Lv ! , ERIK'S BOULEV4RD r �".• , „r.O ,,, ., W SyY sdoii�� W B r ie...•'7. rl i•iia• I2Z -Ton ...j = rwpa.a• . / . _ @ to N •� w �WN 6 Wr mn 4 ; •am •r Nit, •- aw• t •i 3; CO. RD y en i� n•n-"° ur eeo 11n sae. ro uo m O O a O 0o w •� - "u IS • u E n. 1 I 1. e•• up 1m 1m NO. s,� 31 (PILOT "Iwoe RD 1 \ Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Twenty-One • REZONING/DRENCKHAHN A. Alan J. and Baerbel C. Drenckhahn for Rezoning from A to RB Consisting of Approximately .68 Acres -- A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on May 29, 1984, to consider two applications as submitted by Alan J. and Baerbel C. Drenckhahn. The first application consisted of a rezoning to change the land use from an Agricultural to a Roadside Business classification and the second application was for a preliminary plat containing one (1) commercial lot. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the rezoning subject to the beauty parlor use, and the import business only being allowed for a three-year term and that the existing facility could not be expanded until utilities and platting have been applied for. A motion was therefore granted to waive the platting requirements at this time noting there is an existing building on the lot and that future use would include the expansion or addition of land to the north and to allow construction of a fully authentic German restaurant. Enclosed on pages through /a 6 is a copy of the City Planner's report • regarding these applications. Also enclosed is a copy of the minutes of the Advisory Planning Commission meeting, found on page (s) /07 -.f' /O 7:t- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to RB and to approve or deny the waiver of platting requirements for the Drenckhahn property. E 95 • J • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT 8 REZONING TO RB (ROADSIDE BUSINESS) APPLICANT: ALAN J. 8 BAERBEL C. DRENCKHAHN LOCATION: PART OF THE SEi OF THE NEi OF SECTION 4 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 29, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22, 1984 REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting preliminary plat approval and rezoning for approximately .68 acres located west of Pilot Knob Road and south of 494. ZONING AND LAND USE Presently the parcel is zoned A (Agricultural) and would not allow any further development until the property was rezoned. The Compre- hensive Guide designates this parcel as RB (Roadside Business District) which would allow development in accordance with freeway access and service to the transient population. The applicant is proposing to zone in accordance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan and requests a zoning of RB (Roadside Business) for this particular parcel. COMMENTS The applicant is proposing to remodel the 1,354 square foot struc- ture into a gift shop and hair salon. The proposed plan conforms to the setback, parking and lot coverage requirements of the City Code. The applicant is presently operating a beauty parlor as a home occupation. This business would relocate to the proposed new location. The main issue seems to be whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the RB designation being applied for. The Drenck- hahn's long range plan would include the acquisition and rezoning to RB of the land north of the subject parcel for construction of a German restaurant. If this is accomplished, the RB zoning would be contiguous and conforming to the Land Use Guide Plan designation. If approved the plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) The plat be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review since it abuts a county road. 2) The plan be submitted to the City Engineering Department for approval of the drainage and grading alterations. 94 0 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION ALAN J. & BAERBEL DRENCKHAHN MAY 29, 1984 PAGE 2. 3) An appropriate bond be obtained to insure conformance with the landscaping plan. 4) All other City ordinances shall be adhered to. 97 • • E IN..FOR t-1 'OT, • J ` + 358 358' -NIn- 11 1 PPI`PFN'IV _[W P114Q •' �m 1 _ I it j(wjFl4*,k 4r s' J v 0 0 cr • a;w YY ud.. -NIn- 11 1 PPI`PFN'IV _[W P114Q •' �m 1 _ I it j(wjFl4*,k 4r s' J v 0 0 cr j/.•moi '�r�''""i{•--- - - *LOST SPUR / COUNTRY CLUB PF _•may � ..,,..y � �Q � in do i / - [VALLEY I i I - ®- R-1 R-1 11 r_i LB R . RLI TREF LE (ACRE5-1 / o {UNDII1 I �A I I I1 'a I I I I -4I R-4 -il R-4 t.-2 IV I L- , •o L/ v i 1-I n r J 77-- N MM- 808- 2 - 10 • " � TIN T VJ*#LH GB �� `��4%. Mrawfill ME L,gn rr — PF u a 10, N A PrA W n %DDI1 NB NNW L /r / Ga .6 .... !Y.RB Ind 1 ' • ..., riQ_. - / •r ..: s.� p Ind„ PL �- .. • '%-- _ .� .. Ina .*'--�• �7 :,_��..'�f�,j�(.�g� '.._.---- fl GE 6ROSEMOUNQ�_ a_ MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION • C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: RICHARD M. HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: MAY 25, 1984 SUBJECT: DRENCKHAHN PRELIMINARY PLAT The Engineering Division of the Department of Public Works has the following comments concerning this proposed development for consideration by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. GRADING/DRAINAGE A detailed grading plan will be required indicating how storm water run-off from the parking area will be handled. UTILITIES Existing utilities capable of providing service to this proposed development consists of only a 12" trunk watermain located along the the westside of Pilot Knob Road. However, this proposed development lies within the N -J sanitary sewer sub -district as depicted in Figure 1. At this time, there are no lateral sanitary sewer mains in this sub -district. The closest sanitary sewer • to this proposed development is located approximately 300 feet east of Pilot Knob Road in Corporate Center Drive (Old Eagan Industrial Road). This is approximately 500 feet from this proposed development. Although preliminary review by staff indicates the sewer is deep enough in this location, it would not be feasible to extend this sewer any further west due to the fact that existing pavement would have to be removed and replaced and it would not be enough room without obtaining an easement or removing and replacing the bituminous pathway along the westside of Pilot Knob Road to install a sewer line to service this parcel. Besides, the amount of area which could be served by this sewer would be limited since the land in this area generally slopes to the west. Therefore, it would appear to be more appropriate to service sub -district N -J from laterals from the trunk sanitary sewer located within this sub -district. Servicing this proposed development with sanitary sewer at this time may not be all that appropriate when one considers the immedi- ate proposed use being for a beauty salon and gift shop. However, it would be imperative that sanitary sewer be available if and when this proposed development includes the restaurant facility which was mentioned at the previous Planning Commission meeting by the applicants. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY • A fifty -foot public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob Road as a condition of this plat. In addition, a ten -foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all publicly dedicated right-of-way with a five-foot utility and /0/ I ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 24, 1984 PAGE TWO • drainage easement being dedicated adjacent to all exterior lot lines. ASSESSMENTS As a condition of final platting, this development shall be respon- sible for trunk area storm sewer and lateral benefit from trunk watermain. In addition to the above assessments which would be determined at the commercial rate, the water area assessment must be upgraded from residential to commercial. All assessment rates will be the rates which are in effect at the time of final platting. At this time, the above assessments would amount to the following: Water Area - .578 Acres X $2,830 per acre = $1,662 - $150 (1972 Single Family Rate Assessed) = $1,512 Trunk Area .Storm Sewer - 25,560 Square Feet X $.068 per square foot = $1,738 Lateral Benefit From Trunk Water - 83 Feet X $17.87 per front foot = $1,483 • I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report with the Advisory Planning Commission at their meeting of May 29, 1984. Respectfully sub fitted, Richard M. Hef P.E. Assistant City Engineer ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS I) A detailed grading & drainage plan shall be submitted for approval by Staff. 2) A 50' public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob Road, along with easements as referenced in this report. 3) This development shall be responsible for trunk water and storm sewer area assessments and lateral benefit from trunk watermain at the rates in effect at final platting. • s. MENDOTA \ 'HTS • :� - North \ , Flnterceptor \ GUN CLV9 _ , —:v. ` 5 N -L'. \\ \\:� •. v 3U"- ♦ �• _LaE _ - /.'.�.�---ppv.L//r��..LL �J a SU �CT� F71 CSL / Qi N=H N -N - \�/ f —� I!S' `I♦ 1 36'L Lu TPrrrLE]CP-G I �r , ' /. / ♦� ihl h$rPrSt W.HK -O[I 83 36"�= �i N -G / — 15" I� _ •� 112" N -P ��• I fir" 12" d I. �I / I I 15 N-0 /®- I / C -C --I 1 1 •_// N -E -B 1 P N - V N -U I /. - 26 30" r— ------- I 12° _ 7C7D rat I12It sop rktiww; ;`m acres . .d,• / 12' 12'• .`�c, �� 1 5 C-00 C -NN ; 29 ;�LAKE- �a6 �_�s- ` 33 _Ti■■ ■\/t1� n: .. — _�'S�(j�� _ _ 112" OLCCK�441 V^� ` / • M ET ,.1 --- S W� c• C , r APC AFTERNOON AFTER • May 29, 1984 The following is a brief account of what transpired at the May 29, 1984, Advisory Planning Commission meeting. OLD BUSINESS A. ALAN J. AND BAERBEL C. DRAENCKHAHN, for rezoning A (Agricul- tural) to RB (Roadside Business) consisting of approximately .68 acres and Preliminary Plat also of consisting of the .68 acres and containing one (1) commercial lot. In part of the SE; of the NE;, Section 4 west of Pilot Knob Road. Discussion and Action Advisory Planning Commission noted that this item has been on the agenda for several meetings and that the applicants have now submit- ted a request to plot the property along with the original request to rezone from Agricultural to Roadside Business. The Planning Commission reviewed this particular item in two parts. First the proposed zoning request, noting that the applicants are proposing to rezone in accordance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. However, the uses may not specifically fit the RB zoning at this time but thatin the long range goal the Draenckhahns are proposing, would be consistent with RB or Roadside Business zoning. After a lengthy • discussion regarding the use of the property on a tentative basis the Commission then reviewed the Preliminary Plat noting with this plat request there will be direct access off of Pilot Knob Road. Also, there is a surface road provided to the north which would probably provide access to the westerly portion of the lot and re- move the direct access from Pilot Knob Road. The Commission noted that this is hopefully the long range plan and should be reviewed by the Engineering Department. The Commission also noted that this is also the direction or the location in which this particular parcel would have accessibility to utilities in the area. After discussing the platting versus waiving the plat and the uses propos- ed, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning subject to the beauty parlor use and import business only being allowed for a three year term and that the existing facility could not be expanded until utilities and platting has been applied for. This motion was approved unanimously by the Planning Commission. The second motion was to waive the platting requirements at this particular time noting that there is an existing building on the lot and that future use would include the expansion or addition of land to the north and a use of a full authentic German restaurant. Noting that other activity is occuring within the general area, that platting may not be too far in the future, the Commission waiv- ed this request with a condition that the applicant provide or meet the conditions set forth in the May 22, 1984 Staff Report. This item has been scheduled for the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting • for Council consideration. /0 7Z Advisory Planning Commission Afternoon After - May 29, 1984 Page Two B. SIENNA CORPORATION (ROD HARDY), for Preliminary Plat, Birch Park Addition consisting of approximately 43 acres and con- taining 73 single family lots. Located in Outlots B, C, D, and F Windcrest Second Addition. Discussion and Action r , E Advisory Planning Commission noted that this item had been continued from the April 24, 1984, Advisory Planning Commission, in order to get background information from the original platting which oc- cured in 1979. The Commission also had requested that Staff look at the accesses onto Deerwood Drive and how many access points Birch Park Addition would have. The applicants had revised their original plat and reduced four lots on Deerwood Drive, which would have 200 feet of frontage and would be more consistent with the lot sizes that presently exist along Deerwood Drive. with these revisions, The Planning Commission again reviewed this Preliminary Plat noting that.the applicant had made revisions and tried to incorporate the concerns of the Surrounding neighbors. The biggest issue that was discussed in regard to this revised plat, is the Fawn Ridge street which would be eliminated with this revised plat. As you recall, Fawn Ridge Street provided an access to a property to the west which topographically would have been hard to service from Pilot Knob • Road. The applicant also indicated that the feasibility or the cost of this road was excessive and preferred not to provide this street connection. After substantial review and input from the surrounding neighbors, the Advisory Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to the conditions of the Staff Report with the addition that driveway accesses to the lots on Deerwood Drive be reviewed and approved by City Staff in order to provide the best access in regard to topography and vegetation. Also, the Planning Commission recommended that the conditions of the original planned development initiated in 1979 also be adhered to with this revision to the Preliminary Plat. Also, that adequate storm sewer easement be obtained by this development in order to provide proper drainage across the McCarthy property. This item was originally scheduled for the June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting for Council consideration, however, the applicant is requesting that this item be placed on the June 19, 1984, City Council Meeting for Council consideration. Therefore, note this particular chage and request by the applicant. C. SIENNA CORPORATION (ROD HARDY), FOR Preliminary Plat Pilot Pointe consisting of approximately 8.8 acres and containing 20 single family lots, locted in part of the NW; of Section 22, east of Pilot Knob Road. Discussion and Action The Advisory Planning Commission reviewed the Preliminary Plat Pilot • Pointe noting that this particular plat was the parcel which /0 "5r • • • Advisory Planning Afternoon After - Page Three Commission Meeting May 29, 1984 access to be provided to from Birch Park Addition, therefore, the approval of Birch Park Addition with the elimination of Fawn Ridge Drive allowed for the cul-de-sac to be provided from Pilot Knob Road. The Preliminary Plat consists of 8.8 acres and the applicant is proposing to plat 20 single family lots all which meet or exceed the R-1 residential single district zoning requirements. Access to these lots would be from a cul-de-sac off of Pilot Knob Road. the main reason this particular plat is in at this time, is in conjunction with I -35E construction. This particular development is contingent on obtaining approximately 250,000 cubic feet of fill in order to obtain the proper grades to provide proper access to this development. After a great deal of discussion and input from the surrounding neighbors, the Advisory Planning Commission did recommend approval of this particular plat contingent on the condi- tions in the Staff Report. Also, with the addition that storm drain- age easements be obtained from the McCarthy property in order that the proper storm drainage and ponding areas can be obtained to handle the runoff from this development. The Commission also sug- gested that condition #4 of the Engineering Report be eliminated and that the north/south access easement be allowed as proposed by the developer. With these changes, the application has been scheduled for the June 19, 1984, City Council Agenda for Council consideration. D. Mr. Hall then brought up that he had received a request from Federal Land for the Commission to hold a special Public Hearing in order that Federal Lane could obtain the shortest possible pro- cessing time the schedule could allow. Federal Lan had requested that a special Planning Commission meeting be held on June 18, in order that they could save two weeks in the processing of their particular request. The Planning Commission reviewed this request noting that they have not held a special Public Hearing or special meeting to review development proposals in the past and that this particular request is not any different then the requests that they have received in the past and elected not to hold a special meeting in order to process this application. With that the Commission recommended they be placed on the regular schedule and be processed in accordance with the policies and procedures of the City. E. Dale Runkle introduced Mr. Greg Ingraham who has been hired recently in a fulltime position in the Planning Department for the City. Mr. Runkle had indicated that with an additional person in the Planning Department we will then be able to start to update studies and reports to obtain up-to-date figures and up -date portions of the Comprehensive Plan where these figures and numbers were gathered 5 years ago. The City will also be using John Voss also to help provide the information in order to update this material. There being no further business, the Planning Commission meeting adjourned approximately 9:30 p.m. 166 APC Minutes May 29, 1984 • ALAE DRAENC®AHN - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAY The public hearings regarding the application of Alan J. Draenckhahn and Baerbel Draenckhahn for rezoning from A (Agricultural) to RB (Roadside Busi- ness) and for preliminary plat approval of approximately 6.68 acres in part of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 4 on the west side of Pilot Knob Road was convened by Chairman Hall. Dale Runkle, City Planner, detailed the two applications, noting that the property is zoned Agricultural and the Comprehensive Guide designates the parcel as RB (Roadside Business District). The proposal by the applicants is to remodel the 1,354 square foot structure into a gift shop and hair salon with possible restaurant to be constructed in the future. The main issue concerned whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the RB designation, noting the land north of the parcel was intended to be purchased by the applicants. Mr. & Mrs. Draenckhahn were present and questions were raised by Planning Commission members, including whether the real estate tax value would increase because of the preliminary plat versus a waiver of plat. The proposal by the Draenckhahns at the present was to apply • for waiver of plat, rather than the final plat, noting that the parcel is intended to be expanded in the future. Mr. Runkle stated that the plat could be required at the time the restaurant is applied for. Member Wold was concerned about the RB zoning for gift shop and hair salon, noting that it may not be appropriate in RB zoned areas, according to the Ordinance. There were no objections from neighboring property owners and the Draenckhahns indicated they did not expect signage would be necessary along Pilot Knob Road. The planning commission members generally felt the application was prema- ture for platting because a curb out may not be appropriate if the service road is extended in the future. After considerable discussion, Hall moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend rezoning to RB on a conditional basis for the two uses, including hair salon and gift shop as applied for by the applicant for a maximum period of three years with the understanding that no expansion of the present use or building would be permitted during that period of time; further, that at the end of the three year period, that the applicant must then apply for and acquire approval of an application for preliminary plat approval or the conditional zoning would cease and the uses would then terminate; further, it was recommended that the Planning Commission and Council extend the time in the event that adequate hardship is shown. All voted in favor. Hall then moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of an application for waiver of plat, subject to the following condi- tions: 1. That the waiver will be permitted for a maximum of three years unless hardship is shown and extended by the City Council. • 2 /0-/ - . APC Minutes May 29, 1984 2. The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review since it abuts a county road. 3. The plan shall be submitted to the City Engineering Department for approval of the drainage and grading alterations. 4. An appropriate bond shall be obtained to insure conformance with the landscaping plan. 5. All other City ordinances shall be adhered to. 6. A detailed grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for approval by staff. 7. A 50 foot public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob Road, in addition to further easement if service road is required, along with easements as referenced in this report. 8. This development shall be responsible for trunk water and storm sewer area assessments and lateral benefit from trunk watermain at the rates • in effect at final platting. All voted in favor. 0 3 /07 a, Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -Two CONTRACT 84-11/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS B. Contract 84-11, Approve Plans 8 Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Oak Cliff Pond Outlet) -- On May 15, the staff prematurely presented the detailed plans and specifications for Council review for the installation of the lift station and force main outlet for Oak Cliff Pond within the Oak Cliff development adjacent to Slater's Road. This plan review was premature due to the fact that the technical public hearing process could not be completed until the June 5 Council meeting. With Project 400 being considered by the City Council earlier on the agenda under Public Hearings, and if it is approved, it would now be appropriate to formally approve the detailed plans and specifications then authorize the advertisement for bids. These detailed plans were prepared in advance due to the fact that the developer signed a petition guaranteeing all costs associated with the preparation should the project not be approved by Council action under the Public Hearing agenda item. All easements necessary for the installation of this project under Contract 84-11 have been acquired through the final plat of the Oak Cliff development which was approved by • Council action on April 17, 1984. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-11 and, if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 29. C, J M., Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three • PRELIMINARY PLAT/BIRCH PARK ADDITION A. Sienna Corporation for Preliminary Plat, Birch Park Addition Consisting of Approximately 43 Acres and Containing 77 Dwelling Units in Outlots B, C, D, E and F, Windcrest 2nd Addition -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on May 29, 1984, to consider a preliminary plat application for Birch Park Addition as submitted by Sienna Corporation. This item was originally scheduled for the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting. However, due to an absence by the property owner, the item is rescheduled for the June 19 meeting. There are approximately six to eight neighbors on Deerwood Drive that were noticed for the public hearing at the Advisory Planning Commission meeting and they have been notified by the Planning Department that this item will be continued until the June 19 meeting. Information regarding this item will be presented with the City Council packet for that meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a contin- uance of the preliminary plat application for Birch Park Addition until the June 19 City Council meeting. E /0 f Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Is Page Twenty -Four • WAIVER OF PLAT/OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION B. Corporate Construction for Waiver of Plat to Split a Duplex Lot for Individual Ownership, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition - An application was made for waiver of Plat to split a duplex lot for individual ownership described as Lot 2, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition. The applicant was Corporate Construction and for additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report found on pages 11t through //�_/= - ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the Waiver of Plat as requested by Corporate Construction. //0 CITY OF EAGAN • SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND EXISTING ZONING: R-2ITION DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 5, 1984 DATE OF REPORT; JUNE 1, 1984 REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I APPLICATION SUBMITTED: ing a waiver of plat An application has ownership, in order been submitted to split a duplex lot request - COMMENTS: for individual Lot 2, Block 1, is an approved square feet which exceeds the 15,000 is a newt quare duplex lot of to divide y constructed square foot 15,505 for duplex unit which requirement. There the individual ownershi the splitting of this p Staff applicant would like subject to all lot. If approved, finds no problems with other City ordinance ruir the lot split • quirements, s should be / J Gre?g_ In r GHI:jbd attachments • SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE N /F"011"nu'i I� SED EL b h O T12 c4OPOSED°ARCELaa 5 Al 830-3-3141"W CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION 159.94 \A\\PR O .DRdY1 = N \ \ a ��+ 91I4 XHlJq �43 � Di— j \W N-- p0 94K I ••943.3 28.00\ a CAR O P"Pose� . DR/Yf�yy 24.00 00 28D0 I "'8.30'334111W 83 �� 52.00 `334/ w /49.30 O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT PROPOSED DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A -'- .9r,19 J I' 9018 Xa,0.2r1 I 25 The northerly 50.00 feet,as measured at right angles,of Lot 2, Block 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. PARCEL B Lot 2, Block 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, except the northerly 50.00 feet, as measured at riaht angles, of said Lot 2. WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISON AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY, rno+ //2,0 ^,. OAKWOOD L^1 . 'l.l • MW COC M[\ b aera6.3a•E of s. E) Ii OUTLOT R W 942x25 I , b cI % • T ' 443y9._!547 ID ' 9445-43 1$mo 719f 11_ 10\�t" HEIGHT 2ND ADDITION Y +.n141 z6- ° 14 t �•'1'n'.rR'�,,'U`;h76a-51 �a9• I n-.r•r. .1 �\<n �i,i �1�9t ���a JBL ¢��� � � �!'�r•Y ��� � °� W S[�-� q/rE•ss ° . w!C 0 �� tai �n� L �".vr�s' ` '/e�/ OUTLOT e I p040 4� " t " hb / UE"s U2 / OEROr[9 II= O "PMERAT IOR Ci / O A. DD2Esa MAP p Z. PD z, W 74-I 0, Z. I !�ri�"' EM ■ �tilG • 1�1111� own CzN RIM- calf �t/'� �'�•-'7'' � ���q/ � EXCEPTION (NOT INCLUDED IN PARK) RM A. In Fi I r LM Z. PD z, W 74-I 0, Z. I !�ri�"' EM ■ �tilG • 1�1111� own CzN RIM- calf �t/'� �'�•-'7'' � ���q/ � EXCEPTION (NOT INCLUDED IN PARK) RM • C1 J • Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five VARIANCE/SUNCLIFF DEVELOPMENT COMPANY C. Suncliff Development Company for a Variance from the Sideyard Setback Along a Public Street, Suncliff 1st Addition -- An applica- tion was presented by Suncliff Development Company for a variance from the sideyard setback along public street within Suncliff 1st Addition. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is found on pages 1/4 through /.2 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance application as presented by Suncliff Development Company. • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCES APPLICANT: ADVANCE DEVELOPERS LOCATION: 8 LOTS IN SUN CLIFF 1ST ADDITION, SEC. 29 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 PD DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 5, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 31, 1984 REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting side yard setbacks on 8 single family lots located in Sun Cliff 1st Addition (see attached list & plan). COMMENTS: Suncliff lst Addition is a small lot subdivision which received Final Plat approval on October 18, 1983. The variances being requested are all on corner lots of interior streets except for Lots 1, Block 3 which is on Beaver Dam Road. is The City Code requires a 30' setback from the R.O.W. of a public street. The applicant is requesting 101_, 7' and 5' variances from that requirement. The reason for the variance request is to accomodate the various house plans onto the corner lots. If the full 30' setback was re- quired it would be very difficult to locate or place structures on these particular lots. This variance request was originally asked for with the overall plan, however, the minutes of July 19, 1983, state that this must be applied for. Attached is a copy of the July 19, 1983 minutes for your review. . If approved, the variances should be subject to the following conditions: 1) All other conditions of the Suncliff P.D. Agreement. 2) All other conditions and ordinances be adhered to. • Greg H. Ingrah m GHI:jbd attachments 116 a 0 List of lots with requested variance: Lot 13, Block,l, Sun Cliff First Addition 10' side yard variance on Timber Wolf Trail Lot 1, Block 2, Sun Cliff First Addition 10' side yard variance on Timber Wolf Trail Lot 13, Block 2, Sun Cliff First Addition 7' side yard variance on Bear Path Trail Lot 1, Block 3, Sun Cliff First Additon 5' side yard variance on Beaver Dam Road Lot 11, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition 10' side yard variance on Sunset Road Lot 25, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition • 10' side yard variance on Sunset Road Lot 26, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition 10' side yard variance on Sunset Road Lot 1, Block 5, Sun Cliff First Addition 10' variance on Sunset Road //7 0 • Council Minutes ' July 19, 1983 171 SON CLIFF - PREL11MURY PLAT The application of Advance Developers, Inc. for preliminary plat approval of Sun Cliff Addition, consisting of approximately 89.1 acres and containing 277 dwelling units was next considered. The Advisory Planning Commission heard the application on July 12, 1983 and recommended denial including those reasons contained in the Advisory Planning Commission minutes. Dave Sellergren was present and indicated that the proposal is to change the use t -� from R-4 to R-1 plus a few duplex units, with a total of 274 units. He statea a meeting had been held with neighboring owners and that all single family homes would now be built on.Beaver Dam Road with the exception of one duplex corner unit. The minimum width would be 60 feet at the building setback line. He further stated that there would be proposals for amendments to the planned development, including the extension of Beaver Dam Road southerly and also, the south area would be proposed to be transformed into a mixed development, including housing, and commercial uses. He further requested that 20 foot setbacks be allowed -on interior lots because the streets would be 60 feet in width, according to staff recommendation. Also, a trail would be eliminated to the pond to the north. Several neighbors were present and generally agreed with the proposal, with no objections. Mr. Sellergren stated that the intent is of the applicant is to rezone'each of the phases as the time of request for final plat approval. Thomas moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall submit an application for variance for lots and internal streets for setback purposes. 2. The developer shall impose restrictive covenants for for maintenance of the duplexes, rather than the imposition of a requirement for Homeowners Association. 3. Deviation from lot size shall be in accordance with the exibit submitted stating all lot sizes within this development. 4. The 30 footsetbackshall be allowed on Beaver Dam Road. 5. The parkland proposal shall be reviewed by the Park Commission and be subject to their recommendation. 6. The development agreement shall be signed prior to the application of final plat. 7. The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because it abuts a County Road. 8. All other applicable ordinances shall be complied with. • 9. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff. All voted in favor. SEE PLAT FILE //F, I , SUN CLIFF FIRST ADDITION •" � ADOR HOUSEESSES rr%i!r /idlt [....•.. a.. nn r [y.. e.n r.nn+ r� r • /6. 1, lr H•y •w+ [ 'Ok+dle•wil—_-� � i r r I�- �y.- __ As. •A.f ;�, n � r , 4. .y -r f �-•��.i'u--wo--- ntre. n. °. r—=rrr ,p��r 41�' ,wA� • �T • � .;w�.4t �.• 'w • w'rio .')'+ •� ° •�+� • •' ( . 16 \\ • :�eP I: � c' f '��"�' Ta, • 4 !'. � + F, '1•r i+� !y � \�•� .1 L'T n I ya a e r +•i.e i re _ �\ •`j� A l e \ \ � yr � P �\ �.�1.,.r .! .rte• I� w:r may, %, •fss• • .s rn.; rr ![ =1 •r Ile It ,�I `t \ t +�>,r � • �: .y� 't• �;t k nil, � 1M`•�.�. i � �• /� ,w .t,, e, sl.,\. n'c :• a AIN yft sl - r4+0 /-0` � '�.� to �n 1',�� 1 � t•s � f>Imm A �s �.Y ��i 0° .w� n • ,V �wYn .V •+r .fir". lV 'i Lei[ � r = _ t 4/j:, / \\ i y� • ti,� rl�• R ,,% '� .I ppppppw�� Cll MTNDCN D AS SOCIAT(S, INf;• �"'- I v� �Q t C.R.-WINDEN 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. jj�J LAND SURVEYORS Tel {46-394{ 1381 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 66106 For: KEY—LAND HOMES • NOTE: D Denotes Wooden Stake Proposed Garage Floor E1...M.03 (SEB.7) Denotes Proposed Finished Ground E1. Ir' Q —.1 Denotes Direction ft Of Surface Drainage Cb OyP Vertical Datum - N.G.V.D. 1929 J�f 10 / \ iZ6•�9' fore Scale: 1" = 30' oc Zy iy ���; C Denotes Iron •P M, r Monument O / /O / `aQ � 30 O /6.3 yi• / `l b a: BF \d � r q Ty Zy.E //o Lot 13, Block 2, SUN CLIFF FIRST ADDITION, Dakota Coanty, Minnesota. WE MEREST CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVET OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF All BUILDINGS. IF ANY. THEREON, AND All VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND. •Doted this Il th dot, of AF.ri I A D 1954 C. R. WINDEN L ASSOCIATES. INC. lor S,,••vor. M,nn•,ol• toR.,lrol:on No 7 7� /.2-0 CP .7 t < t19 LOT 13, BLOCK SGALE•. I" - 30'—O" 9 N C, • W 0/ 91" For: McKlyn Construction, Inc. • Q Q 3 C. R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS T*L 646.3646 1711 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 66108 S Scale: 1" - 30' \ Ns' 0. NOTE: 6 O G Denotes.Iron Monument ?9•. s Denotes Wooden Stake F (C5 Proposed garage floor E: -e23.3 (800.0) Denotes proposed finishee: ground E1. . me— Denotes direction of surface drainage Vertical Datum - N.G.V.D. 1929 '19/4 v Lot 1, Block 3, :>ULJ CLIFF FIRST ADDITION Dakota County, Minnesota WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE Df SCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF All BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON, AND All VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND •Doled IAu 14 rA day of F " '/1 A D. fV B4 C. R./+ DIN a ASSOCIATES, INC. Uv S�..oYer, M.nnewre Repnvorron No 77?G / 0 62e - > r41� lb o � \ \\� C Q Q ►�'� n) t v V /01 \ O /S / o v�. • i JZ ' LOT I I, BLOCK 4 SCALE = P'= 30'-0" /.23 0 0 • 0 • 0 S�NSF T r So, 4m• r r I r L07 ZS, BLOCK 4 SCALE: I"= 30' - O" 171 -k\N - 0 0 �1�N �33a DO \ H Uo O 10 P. 171 171 LOT Z (,o, BLOCK SCALE: I" =ZO'-O" 12(� m N v n Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -Six • RESOLUTION/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE D. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance for a Resolution Providing for a Concurrent Detachment of Incorporated Land -- At the last regular City Council meeting, the City Planner and City Administra- tor reviewed a parcel of property north of and adjacent to Inter- state 494 that is partly in the City of Mendota Heights and partly in the City of Eagan. There is a request by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance that this property be annexed to provide continuity for development purposes. For further information on this item, refer to a memorandum prepared by the City Planner found on pages /.2 through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the Resolution providing for concurrent detachment and annexation of incorporated land as requested by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company. 1zQ • MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: MAY 31, 1984 SUBJECT: DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY FOR NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE As you may recall at the last City Council meeting, the City Council suggested Staff review to look into the potential and possibilities as to what could be done in order that agreements or transactions could be made for these slivers of property which now are basically detached from Eagan and Mendota Heights by the construction of I-494. In reviewing these small isolated parcels, the recommenda- tion for its request by Northwestern Mutual Life and Northland Mortgage Company is the detachment and annexation procedure which will then transfer these parcels to the City of Mendota Heights. This then would allow for a continuous parcel in which Northland Mortgage is proposing to develop at this time in Mendota Heights. In reviewing .the overall northern boundary of the City of Eagan, it appears that on the east side of the interchange of I-494 and I -35E that the same situation will occur, however, there will be • slivers of Mendota Heights property in the City of Eagan. Hopefully, the same transaction will occur on the easterly side of this inter- change as what is occurring on the west. In review of this, the City is not just giving away property to the City of Mendota Heights but will mutually work out where Mendota Heights will also be giving Eagan some property in the future. Enclosed with this memorandum is a Resolution that the City of Mendota Heights approved on May 15, 1984. Staff has also included a Resolution which the City of Eagan can adopt stating the similar information required for the concurrent detachment and annexation procedures. Once each of the Cities have adopted these Resolutions and if both Cities agree, it is a fairly simple task going through the process of annexation. Also, enclosed is a survey provided by Northwestern Mutual Life showing the parcels which are being annexed by the City of Mendota Heights. If you have any questions or would like additional information regarding this particular. item, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Dale C. Runkle • DCR:jbd Attachments CITY OF EAGAN DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR CONCURRENT DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION OF INCORPORATED LAND WHEREAS, certain contiguous parcels of land falling within the corporate limits of the City of Eagan, at the southern boundary of the City of Mendota Heights, have been separated from the major portion of the City of Eagan as the result of I-494 construction; and WHEREAS, the parcels of land, currently owned by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, are bounded on the north by -the southern boundary of a portion of the Mendota Heights Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the owners of the property and Northland Land Company that the land be acquired by Northland Land Company; and WHEREAS, the property is isolated by the freeway from the majority of Eagan and is a natural extension of both, both abutting the Mendota Heights Industrial Park and the corporate limits of • Mendota Heights; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan that the City Council is desirous of detaching Parcels No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 shown and described on the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Composite Survey attached hereto; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Minnesota Municipal Board is hereby requested to order the concurrent detachment of the des- cribed parcels from the corporate limits of the City of Eagan and its annexation into the corporate limits of the City of Mendota Heights in accordance with the provisions of Minne:;ota Statutes, Section 414.061 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan this 5th day of June, 1984. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN By 130 • CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. 84- 30 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR CONCURRENT DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION OF INCORPORATED LAND WHEREAS, certain contiguous parcels of land falling within the corporate limits of the City of Eagan, at the southern boundary of the City of Mendota Heights, have been separated from the major portion of the City of Eagan as the result of I-494 construction; and WHEREAS, the parcels of land, currently owned by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, are bounded on the north by the southern boundary of a portion of the Mendota Heights Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the owners of the property and Northland Land Company that the land be acquired by Northland Land Company; and WHEREAS, the property is isolated by the freeway from the majority of Eagan and is a natural extension of both, both abutting the Mendota Heights Industrial Park and the corporate limits of Mendota Heights; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the City Council is desirous of annexing Parcels No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 shown and described on the Northwestern Mutual Life is Insurance Company Composite Survey attached hereto; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Minnesota Municipal Board is hereby requested to order the concurrent detachment of the described parcels from the corporate limits of the City of Eagan and its annexation into the cor- porate limits of the City of Mendota Heights in accordance with the pro- visions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 414.061. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of May, 1984. ATTEST: K.Irthleen M. Swanson, City Clerk r�L CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By 44�,,Z l o(trC�^' Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor l3/ �• a u,v .err r1...I a VVn COMPOSITE SURVEY FOR NORTHWESTERN4kUTUAL LIFE • r 4r•u.., �..�r.w�11 F•a s•r•.nr ••.'I•A IACfl / �•�nn.11 VJYfiIIt� ICRC[,. , ... .I INSURANCE CO. If.1l'.: �: •�i�i. is r I . .,•w r .n y V, od.. r� u _wr nil e, v.eatn•1... +�• = � _'_ _ ' ; ,v .YMp � s.rwiw..r Von VF. I .... .•v wlTr^... w�. C I A94 _Lr ys r.•n PINT RSTATE— c �• - •tea. .w ...H � 4 • 'I i�9 I• S + , 1. I I , j • ]SID h ` Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven MUNICIPAL CENTER LANDSCAP A. Municipal Center Landscaping -- Following the referendum for the Municipal Center project, a budget was approved by the City Council in the amount of $10,000 to complete landscaping around the Police Department -Municipal Center complex. With the amount of black dirt required to properly grade the area, the cost for sod, trees, bushes and other landscape material, the budget will not be adequate to complete the project. In addition, an identification sign was proposed on Pilot Knob Road to identify the Municipal Center building which was not budgeted for as a part of the project. The Director of Parks and Recreation was directed to prepare a design for an identifica- tion sign and budget for completing the landscaping at the Municipal Center building. The memorandum and final design work have not been completed, however will be included with the Administrative Agenda packet on Monday. It is important to consider finalization of the landscaping so the work can be completed before the hot months occur in July and August. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the • changes to the Municipal Center landscaping plan. E 133 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight BURNSVILLE/EAGAN CABLE COMMISSION B. Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission -- Periodically, the City Administrator places the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission item on the official agenda to provide an update on the progress being made by Group W in their efforts to fulfill the franchise agreement. The City Administrator will provide a report regarding the time schedule for installation of cable television at the meeting on Tuesday. The Cable Communications Commission has been operating with dollars that were generated from a $10,000 franchising application fee. The Commission is to be funded from revenues collected as a result of a three to five percent franchising fee. Since residents of both communities are not serviced by cable at this time, there is no franchising fee available to the Cable Commission which is the main source of revenue. Group W will advance to the Cable Communications Commission future franchising fees to allow for their operations before cable connections are made. In order to receive an advance on the franchise fees from Group W, both the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan must approve a transfer to the Cable Commission, the Cable Commission will then make a request of Group W and reimburse the two Cities. A formal request has been received from the Joint Commission that each City appropriate $20,000 at this time and an immediate request be made from Group W to advance franchise fees to the Commission in the amount of $40,000 and as soon as those monies are received, both the communities will be fully reimbursed byy the Joint Cable Communications Commission. Enclosed on page /3S is a copy of this request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an appropriation of $20,000 from the City of Eagan to fund the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Communications Commission with the under- standing that the City of Eagan will be fully reimbursed as soon as an advance is received from Group W to the Cable Communica- tions Commission for future franchise fees. 13 54 • E of aagan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 MOIiO1 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER CC MO ms MAY 30, 1984 THOMAS HEDGES ON Ab "Ia EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE Gro Cb k Tan Hedges City Administrator Fagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, Mn. 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: The Burnsville/Eagan Cable Communications Cartnission requests an appro- priation of $20,000.00 from each of the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan to fund the Commission according to its approved 1984 General Budget. Franchise Article II, "Grant of Franchise and Acceptance," section 1, item 2 on p. 7 states: After the initial payment of the acceptance fee, should costs in excess of the acceptance fee be incurred by City prior to the payment of the first Franchise fee, City may charge such excess costs to Grantee and Grantee shall pay then on demand by City, as an advance on the payment of Franchise fees. The Cc mLission appreciates your cooperation. Thank you, Ann C. Bevis, Cable Adninistrator cc. Honorable Chair Jim Smith Treasurer Ron Voracek Finance Director Gene VanOverbeke 13T THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting is Page Twenty -Nine CONTRACT 84-6/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS C. Contract 84-6, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Sealcoating) -- As a part of the approved 1984 budget, $60,000 from the general fund was provided for sealcoating to be matched in a like amount from the major street fund to provide a total of $120,000 for sealcoating during 1984. The following subdivisions are proposed to be sealcoated under Contract 84-6: "Buck Shot" Duckwood Estates St. Francis Woods 1st Addition St. Francis Woods 2nd Addition Drexel Heights Cedar Grove 8th Addition Meadowlands Addition Hilltop Estates Evergreen Acres "Trap Rock" Thomas Lake Road Duckwood Drive Wescott Road (Pilot Knob to Denmark) The estimated cost of this sealcoating program is approximately $118,000. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss • this year's sealcoating program with the Council at the meeting on June 5. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify the plans and specifications for Contract 84-6 (sealcoating) and, if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Monday, July 2, 1984. C� /3 4 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Thirty • CONTRACT 84-14/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS D. Contract 84-14, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place South) -- Under Item A of Public Hearings, the City Council will be considering the installation of utilities to service the Lexington Place 2nd Addition and the Lexington Place South Addition. When the Council received the petition requesting the preparation of the feasibility report, the developer also requested simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specifications while guaranteeing their cost should the project not be approved by Council action at the public hearing. That allowed the staff, through the consultant, to prepare these detailed plans to be presented to the Council on the same night as the public hearing. Therefore, if the public hearing for Project 404 is approved, it would be in order for the Council to consider approving the plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement for bids. Our consulting engineer will be available to discuss in further detail any question the Council may have. The agreement and easement has been executed for the installation of the sanitary sewer across the west property line of Barry and Marge Tilley to provide the development of this subdivision. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify • the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-14 and if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 29, 1984. n U /37 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Thirty -One CONTRACT 84-15/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS E. Contract 84-15, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Sun Cliff 2nd Addition) -- Earlier on the Council agenda, the City Council will be considering Prject 398 for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Sun Cliff 2nd Additions. At the time that the developer submitted the petition requesting the preparation of the feasibility report for that public hearing, they also requested the simultaneous preparation of the detailed plans and specifications while guaranteeing their cost if the project should not be approved by the Council at the public hearing. This allowed the staff, through the consulting engineer, to prepare the plans to be presented for Council consideration on the same night as the public hearing. Our consulting engineer will be available to discuss in detail any questions the Council may have pertaining to this proposed installation of streets and utilities under Contract 84-15. Also, under the Consent Agenda, the Council will be considering the final plat approval for this subdivision which will provide for all the .necessary easements and rights-of-way for this project to commence. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify • detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-15 (Sun Cliff 2nd Addition - streets and utilities) and if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Monday, July 2, 1984. • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 1, 1984 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE Metropolitan Council Chairperson Appointment Mayor Blomquist and the City Administrator have attended two meetings recently where the new Metropolitan Council Chairperson, Sandra Gardebring, was the guest speaker. Those meetings were the Municipal Legislative Commission meeting held Wednesday, May 23, in Plymouth, and the Association of Metropolitan Municipali- ties Banquet held in Brooklyn Park on the evening of Wednesday, May 30. Mayor Blomquist made notes of Ms. Gardebring's speech at the AMM banquet outlining specifically her objectives as the new Metropolitan Council Chairperson. Those objectives are as follows: 1) The Governor's objective to study and possible fund a light rail transit (LRT) somewhere in the metropolitan area. The new chairperson has indicated that this study will be a priority item for the Metropolitan Council. • 2) The creation of a rapid transit board (RTB) which will act as a managing arm of the mass transit commission is also a strong objective of the Metropolitan Council. Because of opt -out and other related legislation that affect a centralized busing effort, it is becoming necessary to create a long range planning arm of the mass transit commission allowing the RTB to involve itself with planning and overall objectives of a mass transit operation and keep the MTC as a operating arm for bus service. Ms. Gardebring is asking for cities to volunteer persons for appointments to the RTB. 3) Solid waste landfill abatement is another priority. 4) The combined sewer overflow (CSO) which mainly affects the two core cities is another priority and concern of the Metropolitan Council. This item would be very expensive and must be carefully weighed. 5) Regional channels for cable television is another effort and priority that the Metropolitan Council will be considering. Two other items of interest and seem to be a priority of the new chairperson are long-term housing efforts for the elderly and other social programs for the elderly since the population • shift has rapidly increased the percentage of elderly in the metropolitan area. Her main summary statement at both presentations /3 y Informative Memo • June 1, 1984 Page Two was the Metropolitan Council will "act as a planning and coordinat- ing body". These statements were emphasized and seemed to be well received by all municipalities. League of Minnesota Cities Presidency Each year a member of the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities is selected to be president and another member as vice-president. The vice-president normally moves into the presidency the following year. This year Iry Anderson, of Interna- tional Falls, is president, while Adrian Herps, a city councilmember in Bloomington, is vice-president. Mr. Herps has decided, for business reasons, not to pursue the presidency next year. Since the presidency is rotated between metro and out state, it would be appropriate to select someone on the Board of Directors from the metropolitan area to be nominated for the League presidency. Mary Anderson, the Mayor of Golden Valley and former chairperson of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, is seeking the presidency and has received significant support from suburban communities. Mayor Blomquist is suggesting that the City of Eagan support Mary Anderson for the presidency. She is very sympathetic to local government aids and many of the issues • that are confronting the City of Eagan as well as other suburban communities. More than likely, she will not be opposed and if she is, it would probably be generated from a League Board member in one of the two core cities. Final Cost Analysis of the Minnesota Jockey Club For a Class A Horse Racing Facility The City Administrator has concluded the final processing of all bills involving the Minnesota Jockey Club's application that was processed by the City of Eagan for a Class A horse racing facility. All the bills were reviewed and a letter drafted to Steve Pflaum with copies of those bills attached to finalize a reimbursement for all expenses incurred by the City of Eagan. As an informative item, the City Administrator has prepared a brief memorandum to the City Council outlining the final cost analysis. A copy is enclosed on page _LSL� Any member of the City Council would like more detail on any of these costs, copies of the bills and more detailed information as prepared by the City Administrator can be made available. use of Dakota County Western Court Facility as Precinct Polling Place The Finance Director/City Clerk has received some resistance from the judges regarding the use of the Western Court Facility • located on Cliff Road as a precinct polling place. The City Administrator has sent a letter to the County Administrator • Informative Memo June 1, 1984 Page 3 copies enclosed for your reference on page /1/-6 , and also has met with staff members of Dakota County to review the issue. Because of the autonomy of the judges, it is very difficult for the County Board to intervene and require that the judges make the facility available. The City Administrator will be visiting with Judge Hoey to explain how the voting will impact their operations and is hopeful that this matter can be worked out by June 13, which is the deadline for any change in precincts as required by the Secretary of State's office. If any member of the City Council has contact with any of the judges and would promote the need and use of one of the courtrooms for polling location, it would be most helpful. Yankee Square Inn A letter was received from Yankee Square Inn regarding a provision that the City of Eagan in time of a disaster can use their airport shuttle bus. A copy of this letter is enclosed on page MASAC • Enclosed on pages / ?' through / ,!rO are copies of minutes of the last MASAC meeting held on April 24. Minnesota Symphony Orchestra Enclosed on page /6'1 is official notification that the Minnesota Symphony Orchestra will be performing at the Minnesota Zoo on Saturday, July 14. Roadside Fruit Stands and Sale Stand At the request of the City Council, the City Attorney has prepared a memorandum regarding roadside fruit stands and sale stands. A copy is enclosed on pages /$Y through /53 Tires Plus Standard The City has sent a letter to the owner of Tires Plus Standard siting their violations on two different occasions. The second letter,- which was sent from the Chief Building Official, is enclosed on page /$11- for your review. Fire Department Monthly Reports Enclosed on pages /6S through 164 are monthly reports for the volunteer Fire Department which represent January and February, 1984. • Rodney Schaumburg Enclosed is a copy of a letter addressed to the Mayor and Council from Rodney Schaumburg concerning the Pilot Knob Road improvements % T� Informative Memo June 1, 1984 • Page 4 and also a response letter from the Director of Public Works to Mr. Schaumburg regarding that item. These letters are enclosed on pages /.57 through /19 Footing Inspection at Woodthrush Court At the recent special City Council meeting, a concern was raised regarding the footings that were poured at 3664 Woodthrush Court and a response from the Chief Building Inspector is enclosed for your review on page /60 Bloomington Platin A concern was also raised at the same special City Council meeting regarding a business that was relocated from Bloomington to Eagan called "Bloomington Plating". Concerns regarding that building are addressed in a memorandum attached on pages /G/ through /63 Entitlement Issuer/ID Bonds Enclosed on pages 1411- through /66 is a copy of a letter and the certification that was sent to the State of Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development regarding Eagan's • request to become an entitlement issuer for industrial development bonds. The City Administrator has contacted the State and learned that the $26,000,000 issue for the Minnesota Jockey Club horse racing track will qualify as an issue. This means that the City of Eagan will be able to utilize three of the top four years, which are 1980, 1981 and 1983, and the average entitlement of each year is in excess of $15,000,000. This means that Eagan could have available some $15,000,000 of industrial revenue bonds to issue for industrial expansion. Most suburban communities, with the possible exception of Bloomington, are looking at an average of about $2-$3,000,000. The issuance of these bonds, though never used by the Minnesota Jockey Club, could be a real bonanza for the City in the next couple of years. Can -American Conditions At the last regular City Council meeting a request was made to provide a copy of all the conditions that were approved for the Can -American project. Those conditions are listed as a part of the May 15 City Council meeting minutes. Policy For Rescue Squad Calls City. Councilmember Thomas has received inquiries from members of the volunteer Fire Department regarding the new policy that was implementea by the Fire and Police Departments- for 'rescue • squad calls. A meeting was held on May 7 between City Council - member Thomas, Chief of Police Berthe, Fire Chief Childers and Informative Memo • June 1, 1984 Page 5 the City Administrator to discuss those concerns. A memorandum was prepared by the City Administrator, a copy is enclosed on pages 147 through /6of" outlining the concerns that were discussed at that meeting. As a result, the two Chiefs were asked to address those questions and issues and a follow-up meeting was held on Tuesday, May 22, at which time the issues were further discussed and a consensus reached that the new policy would continue for one (1) year as an experiment and be evaluated again at that time. City Administrator • E /d i E • 1] MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 31, 1984 SUBJECT: FINAL COST ANALYSIS OF THE MINNESOTA JOCKEY CLUB'S APPLICATION FOR A CLASS A HORSE RACING FACILITY The City of Eagan incurred a number of expenses while processing the Class A horse racing facility application that was presented by the Minnesota Jockey Club. For a general review of those expenses, the following analysis is provided: During 1983, there were engineering expenses incurred totalling $828.50 paid to the Firm of Bonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik, an appraisal fee in the amount of $800.00 for J.E. Parranto Associates, Inc., and legal services to Dave Kennedy in the amount of $2,174.50. There were also legal services paid to Paul Hauge in the amount of $2,230.92 and a reimbursement of City staff time and miscellaneous costs, primarily hours recorded by the City Administrator totalling $5,172.87. Therefore, the total cost reimbursement to the City of Eagan was $11,206.79 for 1983. The costs incurred during 1984 totalled $18,446.46. The cost breakdown for 1984 is as follows: 1. Legal services for Paul Hauge in the amount of $1,331.08. 2. Evensen-Dodge, Inc., for services rendered in the review of the tax increment financing issue in the amount of $12,448.75 and for time allocated and recorded by the City Administrator in the amount of $4,193.75. Therefore, the total expenses incurred by the City and requisitioned for reimbursement by the Minnesota Jockey Club is $17,973.58. 3. Engineering services provided by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik .8 Associates amounted to $472.88. (Previously invoiced and paid.) There were also other expenses incurred by Dave Kennedy and Steve Rosholt during 1984 that were directly billed to the Minnesota Jockey Club and, therefore, are not shown as a request for payment by the City of Eagan. In summary, the total costs incurred by the City of Eagan for staff and consulting services was $29,653.25. All other consulting services and time incurred for the project was a direct obligation of the Minnesota Jockey Club. The time involvement of other City staff was `ori in comparison to other development appli- cations(' \— Y.,.11A City Administrator TLH/jj cc: Gene Van Overbeke, Director of Finance/City Clerk /11C OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. RO. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454.8100 MAY 17, 1984 MR FRED JOY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR DAKOTA COUNTY DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 HIGHWAY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 Dear Fred: BEA BLOMOUIST Mow THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER 0aax+,non�3 THOMAS HEDGES ON Aa Rota EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE ON 0&1 The City of Eagan, through City Clerk Gene VanOverbeke, has made - some informal inquiries concerning the use of the Dakota County Western Court -Facility as a precinct polling place for elections conducted by the City. It is my understanding that Jeff Connell of your staff reviewed the matter with certain County officials and responded that it would be best for the City to not use this facility. It has been the opinion of City of Eagan officials that the use of this facility will allow for the most efficient precints within the City and benefit all concerned parties. It is also the opinion of City officials that the use of one courtroom two to three times per year maximum would not necessarily be disruptive to the normal activities at that location. With advance notice, scheduling should not be a problem. Therefore, please consider this letter to be the City's formal request for use of this facility as provided by M.S.A. 204B.16, Subd. 6, which clearly says that any statutory city, county, school district, etc., shall make their facilities, including parking, available for the holding of city, county, state and federal elections. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We will be happy to provide whatever additional information you desire relative to this request. The City Council is expected to formalize precinct boundaries at its June 5, 1984, meeting and we would very much appreciate a response from your office prior to that time. S, rely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/jj THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY i 11-5 0 YANKEE SQUARE INN 3450 Washington Drive • Eagan. Minnesota 55122 • (012) 452-0100 17J May 17,1984 Honorable Mayor Blomquist Members of City Council City of Eagan P.D. Box 21-199 Eagan Minnesota 55122 Gentlemen, The staff and managment of the Yankee Square Inn, .'is pleased to announce the start of our airport shuttle service. Guests of the Yankee Square Inn will have access to the Eagan business community as well. This service is part of our policy to better serve our Eagan business community, as well as our guests convenience. We are proud to serve the Eagan community, and feel a strong obligation to serve the city that serves us. We at the Yankee Square Inn, would like to offer our shuttle bus to the City of Eagan in the event of an emergency or disaster. The shuttle service is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. It is our sincere hope that such a situation never arises,'but should it become necessary to call on us please don't hesitate to call. If you have any questions or suggestions, as to our service please call me. Si ely, I Timothy B. Dunn General Manager 0 /546 MINUTES METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING 7:30 P.M. April 24, 1984 Minneapolis, Minnesota Call to Order, Roll Call. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Walter Rockenstein at 7:30 p.m. The Secretary was asked to call the roll and the following members were in attendance: Gary White (A) Ben Griggs (R) Robert Johnson (R) Ron Glaub (R) Jeff Hamiel (R) Art Tomes (A) David Woodrow (R) John Richter (R) Walter Rockenstein (R) Jim Serrin (R), Roylene Champeaux (R) Dennis Schulstad (A) Kris Clinton (A) Steve Cramer (A) Scott Bunin (R) Carl Vangsness (R) Joyce Maddox (R) Eugene Bohmert (A) Lloyd Wickstrom (A) Martin Kirsch (R) Donald Priebe (R) Larry Shaughnessy (R) Tom Baker (R) Midway Airlines Northwest Airlines Republic Airlines Minnesota Business Aircraft Association Metropolitan Airports Commission Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce St. Paul Chamber of Commerce City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of St. Paul City of St. Paul City of St. Paul City of St. Paul City of St. Paul City of Richfield City of Richfield City of Mendota Heights City of Eagan 147 • • MASAC Minutes Advisors • John Aamot Nancy Witta Darrell Weslander Joan Vandersloot Visitors Dave Kelso Captain John Lindstrom Colonel Jerry Litschke Captain Dennis Lord Jim Aswegan J. K. Nelson Chauncey Case -2- April 24, 1984 1. Federal Aviation Administration Metropolitan Airports Commission Technical Advisor Secretary Minnesota Pollution Delta Air Lines Army National Guard Army National Guard MN DOT Bloomington Metropolitan Council 2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting of March 27, 1984• Control Agency The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections to the minutes of March 27, 1984. There being none, the minutes were approved as presented. 3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications. • Darrell Weslander presented copies of the articles to be placed in two (2) editions of the Highland Villager and the West Side -West St. Paul Voice regarding the temporary -relocation of the Army National Guard helicopter unit from St'. Paul Downtown Airport to Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport. Chairman Rockenstein introduced Captain John Lindstrom, Chief Pilot, from Delta Air Lines. Captain Lindstrom expressed his personal delight at introducing service to Minneapolis/St. Paul. Delta will fly six (6) trips per day; three (3) from Atlanta and three (3) from Chicago on B727 -equipment. He assured the council that Delta's fleet meets all current noise abatement standards. 4. Technical Advisor's Preferential ilization Reoort and Complaint The reports for the month of March were presented by Darrell Weslander. John Richter asked Jeff Hamiel about projected operations for the next five (5) years. Jeff Hamiel stated that MAC Chairman, Ray Glumack, would like to address MASAC at a future meeting to elaborate on this and related issues. Larry Shaughnessy questioned the take -off methods on runways I1L and 11R. John Aamot of the FAA explained the departure procedure, the separation require- ments involved and the reasons discrepancies may occur. •5• Persons Wishing to Address the Council. There were none. /a Y MASAC Minutes -3- April 24, 1984 0 VA I E Presentation Army National Guard Personnel. Colonel Jerry Litschke presented a brief summary regarding the temporary use of • the facilities at Wold Chamberlain by the Army National Guard helicopter unit. He explained that no training would be conducted at MSP, and that the river corridor route had been coordinated with the tower. The expected date of return to St. Paul is sometime in November or December of this year. Report of Legislative Committee. Larry Shaughnessy reported on the April 12 meeting of the Legislative Committee, and presented Resolution 84-3 in support of the petition to cease the manufacture and registration of aircraft which do not meet Stage 3 noise standards after January 1, 1986. It was moved by Larry Shaughnessy, seconded by Scott Bunin, that the resolution be adopted. The motion passed unanimously. Update: Status of Legislation Regarding Noise Abatement. House File 1945 and Senate File 1914 regardingairport noise abatement authored by Representative Wesley Skoglund was discussed by Jeff Hamiel. While in the Senate, language of the bill was changed; however, Representative Skoglund has thus far not introduced it to the House. It is uncertain whether it will be voted upon during this legislative session. Summary of MAC Staff Meeting with Concerned Citizens in Burnsville. Darrell Weslander briefly described the meeting he and Jeff Hami8l had in Burnsville on April 11 regarding the experimental use of the 180 turn after departure on runway 22, and its affect on the area residents. • Also mentioned was Burnsville's interest in MASAC and its desire to be represented. Report of MASAC Representative to MAC Meeting of April 16, 1984, The summary of the Commission meeting of April 16 was presented by Jeff Hamiel. Items of interest were as follows: - the approval of the lease to Burlington Northern to relocate the Western hangar to the new cargo area adjacent to Republic, - House Bill 1945 (as discussed in item 8. of these minutes), - REIL lights at Anoka/Blaine, - ILS at Airlake, and - the EIS petition regarding Anoka/Blaine as a minor role airport. Other Items Not on the Agenda. • Darrell Weslander explained an upcoming sample study utilizing handicapped individuals to count aircraft operations on the various runways. /SW MASAC Minutes -4- April 24, 1984 12. Establish Next Meeting Date. • The next meeting date was established as May 22, 1984, and an invitation to attend will be extended to Mr. Larry McCabe. 13. Adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at 9:12 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Joan Vandersloot MASAC Secretary \J • 160 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: MAY 18, 1984 RE: FIRST ANNOUNCEMENT MINNESOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA - MINNESOTA ZOO For some time now this department, in cooperation with the communities of Lake- ville and Apple Valley, has been working with the Minnesota Zoo and the Minn- esota Symphony Orchestra in promoting a "free admission" concert at the Minn- esota Zoo. Just recently, we have been able to conclude an agreement and would like to • make you aware of this first announcement that the Minnesota Orchestra will be playing at the Minnesota Zoo on Saturday, July 14, in a free concert for residents south of the Minnesota River. This promises to be an exciting and awesome adventure and certainly a unique event for the residents of our communities. Please mark July 14 on your social calendars as I am sure it will be an event you will want to participate in. Additional information concerning the activ- ities to be promoted as well as the involvement of the Council and Commission will be forthcoming as details are worked out in the next week or two. KV/js lel HAIIGE, SMITH, EIDE & IIELLER, P.A. • ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 9800 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN. MINNESOTA 00122 PAUL H. 14AUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER May 7, 1984 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Roadside Fruit Stands and Sales Stand Dear Tom: AREA COOK 612 TZ"PHONZ 404.4224 I was asked by Mayor Blomquist to explore some questions relating to the location and.expansion of fruit stands along public streets and also questions about vendors of murals, tools, etc., who sell their products either on public street right-of-way or private property adjacent to right- of-way. • 1. Is it permissible for a fruit and vegetable stand that has been located on private property adjacent to a public street to continue to operate and can it expand its operation without a City permit? • Under Eagan City Code Section 11.10, Subd. 3, the continued use, expansion or rebuilding of any use existing upon the date of adoption of the City Code is allowable. However, this is not interpreted to permit an initial develop- ment in accordance with any repealed ordinance. The expansion or rebuilding relates only to existing buildings or uses and also the expansion cannot be so large as to constitute an initial development. Eagan Ordinance Section 11.10, Subd. 3(C) requires a permit for expansion of a nonconforming use but it's only applicable if the use was not preexisting or grandfathered. It would have to be determined whether the fruit and vegetable stand was in existence prior to adoption of the ordinance dealing with non- conforming uses and if not it could not expand without acquiring a -nonconforming use permit. If a vendor is within the public right-of-way or is on public land he or she must have a permit and follow the terms of the permit. /5v Mr. Hedges • May 7, 1984 Page -Two Another area that can be looked at in relation to these kinds of stands is whether there is any public nuisance created such as excessive traffic, safety problems, etc. This .may be grounds for controlling such stands even though they may have been in existence for a long period of time. 2. Can vendors sell murals, tools, etc. without a license or permit on private property or public street right-of-way? Eagan City Code does not prohibit these sales under its solicitations section. See Section The sale of products on residential property may be violative of the Zoning Ordinance which requires it to be residential. If a vendor offers to sell property within street righ-of-way, he or she would be violating Eagan Ordinance 7.05, Subd. 1, which states as follows: "It is a misdemeanor for any person to place, deposit, display or offer for sale, any fence, goods, or other obstructions upon, over, across, or under any street without first having obtained a written permit from the Council, and then only in compliance in all respects with all terms and conditions of such permit, and taking precautionary measures for the protection of the public." In addition, zoning provision Section 11.10, Subd. 9, forbids structures in • public rights-of-way. It states: "No building, structures, or uses may be located in or on any public lands or right-of-way without approval of the Council." Uses could be interpreted to include sales of goods. It appears that if a vendor is within the public right of way or is on public lands, he or she must have a permit and-mugt follow the terms of such permit. skk Very PhelP H. Hauge V City Attorney - City of Eagan 15,3 • W a 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO, BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 0.54-8100 May 11, 1984 MR TOM GEGAX T.H.A. MARKETING CONCEPTS 3760 WAYZATA BLVD GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55416 RE: CITY OF EAGAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TIRES PLUS STANDARD Dear Mr. Gegax: BEA SLOM9UIST �Aca THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH 'ERRY THOMAS THEODORE V.ACHIER =a+�cr eromoa+� -OMAS HEDGES C:ro Arse zrwc EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Please be advised' that it has been brought -to the attention of the City that you have remodeled the Tires Plus Standard Service Station without the appropriate building permit. The Building Inspection Department has penalized you with the appropriate fee for failure to obtain the permit prior to commencement of construction. It has also been brought to our attention that during the remodeling process you eliminated one of your restroom facilities, leaving only one facility in the structure. It would appear that this is a violation of the Uniform Building Code requiring two (2) such facilities where an employer employs more than. four (4) people and includes employees of both sex. The UBC by reference is a portion of the Eagan City Code. Therefore, you are in violation of the City Code. It is the City's position that the Conditional Use Permit is implicitly conditioned upon remaining in compliance with the existing code. Therefore, you are required to correct the violation prior to renewal of your Conditional Use Permit or accept the possibility of non -renewal by the City Council. Sincerely, Dale--Pe`tefrson Chief Building Official CC: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Dale Runkle, City Planner Parcel File THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF January 1984 WORK PERFORMED • TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 720 Training 484 Truck 6 Equipment Maintenance 131 Station Maintenance 143 Fire Prevention 25 Administrative 253 TOTAL 1756 MANPOWER STATION U1 STATION 02 STATION 03 Available Days 12 5 6 Available Nights 12 "jam— �— Available Rotating 2 4 �"— On Leave 1 —T— TOTAL 27 23 16 FIRE/RESCUE • . TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS Structure 12 $10,000 Grass 0 Vehicle 4 1,700 False 3 Medical _ 5 Other 1. TOTAL 28 $11,700 LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS 1-9-84 Cedarvale Parking Lot Car. $ 700 1-9-84 4279 Lodgepole Car 1,000 1-4-84 4158 Rahn Rd 015 Apartment 1,000 1-1-84 2030 Emerald House 6,000 Revised 1-1-83 /5S • • EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF February 1984 WORK PERFORMED $ LOSS TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 740 Training 342 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 131 Station Maintenance 129 Fire Prevention 42 Administrative 375 TOTAL 1759 MANPOWER Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating On Leave TOTAL • FIRE/RESCUE TYPE Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other TOTAL LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME 2-7-84 2-18-84 • STATION 91 12 12 2 1 27 NUMBER 12 0 2 •4 2 1 21 LOCATION 3890 Lexington 4591 Greenleaf Dr., /S6 STATION 02 STATION 03 5 6 13 �^ 4 — 1 23 16 $ LOSS $7,400 $7,400 OCCUPANCY $ LOSS House $6,000 House 2,000 Revised 1-1-83 May 24, 1984 /O-0/000- 030 MUNICIPAL OFFICES 3795 Pilot Knob Road Fagan, Minnesota 55122 Attention: Mayor Bea Blomquist and Fagan City Councilmen Dear Mayor Blomquist: I attended a City Council Meeting on or around July 5, 1983, regarding assessment on the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road (County laud #31). I complained to the City for not obtaining an easement for upgrading the road, storm sewers, etc. I was told to submit a letter within ten (10) days of my complaints, which I did. Not receiving any response to my letter I called City Hall around the 1st of the year. After several phone calls I received some response from the City that there would be an adjust- ment on the storm sewer and nothing more on the other complaints. I was then advised the easement for the road was a County problem. I talked to Dakota County and they said it was a City of Eagan responsibility to obtain an easement. In the past I have written the City with no response, leaving me with the feeling these matters are riot being properly reviewed. I am requesting a letter from the City of Fagan within thirty (30) days as to why they can trespass on private property and upgrade a road without obtaining an ease- • ment. Also,'I never received an itemized assessment statement from the City on the upgrading of Pilot Knob. I would appreciate your attention in this matter as soon as possible. RLS/blw cc: Mr. Fred Joy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1560 West Highway 55 Hastings, Minnesota 55033 Sincerely, 4- L. Schaumburg 3160 Pilot Knob Rcad Eagan, Minnesota 55121 /S% • of ecag a 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 0.54$100 May 30, 1984 Mr. Rodney L. Schaumburg 3160 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: PARCEL #10-01000-030-32 PROJECT #200, PILOT KNOB ROAD UPGRADING Dear Mr. Schaumburg: f7/ BEA BLOMTDUIST Mp THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Cw ,MB , THOMAS HEDGES EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Gro coy Your registered letter to the Mayor and City Council dated May 24th has been forwarded to my attention for review and response. In your letter, you indicate that you have contacted the City but have never received a response leaving you with the feeling that matters are not being properly reviewed. Maybe the documentation in this letter, to your attention, will again remind you of the review per- formed by the City and the action taken or decisions made in regards to your complaints. In your most recent letter, you indicate that you have not received an itemized assessment statement from the City for the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. Enclosed please find two copies of the "Statement of Special Assessment" for Project #177 which dealt with the installation of storm sewer and Project #200 which related directly to the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road and of surfacing. These statements were sent out to all property owners who were assessed under these projects informing them of the amount of the assessment. As you will note, it delineates a pay schedule with interest rates and deadlines, etc. In addition, you will note that subsequent to your complaint submitted at the assessment hearing of July 5, 1983, that the amount of the assessment levied on your property's tax statement, due and payable in 1984, did not contain the $495.00 for the storm sewer laterial assessment. This was a direct result of an investigation of your complaint and a determination made that your property did not receive the benefit which was originally pro- posed to be levied at the assessment hearing on July 5, 1983. You also indicate that you talked with "Dakota County" regarding the easement problem and you were informed that it was the City of Eagan's responsibility to obtain the easement. It is difficult THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY /S9, RODNEY L. SCHAUMBURG MAY 30, 1984 PAGE 2 to believe that the County would inform you that it was the City's responsibility to obtain the easements when it was their legal de- partment who acquired all easements necessary to initiate County Contract 31-05 (Pilot Knob Road). The City had to reimburse the County a certain portion for the right-of-way acquisition costs that were incurred by the County. Therefore, as you can see, it was the full County responsibility to acquire all necessary ease- ments. As you have been informed in the past by several different agencies, the County determined that it already had legal right to the existing 33 foot half right-of-way which you do not agree with. Whether you agree with it or not, it has been determined by the County Attorney's Office that that property was in fact County right-of-way and no additional acquisition was necessary. As you can see, there has been considerable response to your numerous and continuous complaints to both the County and the City regarding this project. It appears the problem is not in receiving a response from the City or the County; but rather, receiving the response that you want to hear. • Therefore, I feel that the City and County have properly responded to your concerns and in the City's instance has taken appropriate corrective action where necessary. Unless any new concerns are brought forth that have not been previously discussed, I will con- • sider the information contained in this letter to be the final response from the City of Eagan. Sincerely, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC:jbd Enclosure cc: The Mayor and City_Council -c/o Thomas V. -Hedges, City Administrator,.- • /59 0 MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: MAY 30, 1984 RE: FOOTINGS AT 3664 WOODTHRUSH CT On a footing inspection, the inspector only sees the form work and soil conditions. The form work shows the inspector the building setbacks and building elevations. The foundation inspection shows the inspector if the foot- ing/foundation assembly is compatible. On this foundation inspection, it was found that the bearing wall assemblies were good, but the partition curb block • areas of the • stairwell were out of place and they will be repaired when the basement floor is poured. The structuralintegrity will not be compromised at all. DP/js CC: Parcel File 140 C: MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: MAY 30, 1984 RE: RICK BODEKER D/B/A BLOOMINGTON PLATING L 15, B 2, EAGANDALE #4 3330 MIKE COLLINS DR The above referenced company moved into the referred building sometime in March. We were unaware of their arrival, or the nature of their business until we were in receipt of their industrial sewer connection application on April 30 as indic- ated on the copy of the enclosed application which we for- warded at that time to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commis- sion. Their permit #0178 was assessed 30 SAC units by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Gould Battery and E&Q Fabricators were the original tenants and they accounted for • five (5) of the SAC units. They were deducted from the 30 that were assessed. I have referred the use of the parcel for review to City Planner, Dale Runkle, and the possibility of the sanitary discharge being detrimental to the City Sewer System to Public Works Director, Tom Colbert. If you need further information, please contact me and I will attempt to gather it for you. DP/js Encl. CC: Tom Colbert, Public Works Director Dale Runkle, City Planner Parcel File • 0 E. INDUSTRIAL: SEWER CONNECTION APPLICATION Company name t. L) rh 33k 1) Mob �: I,,"1-7 ;' /v 225x3 Location seeress - - Mailing address Company Representative Title JC, -x'. /, . Phone number ry 7 - CfZ Iq 1. Nature of business'�rt�a'I'1= ^�"`( l:' 1': i4r ` (" MWCC-7361 (Sn ❑ New building 2. Projected date for facility start up 1.1 Gr'I 1_ `I 3. Total facility area / ? G I~ c sp. ft. 4. No. of employees 5. Operating hours per day fix Operating days per year \❑/Building addition ® Existing building 7. Water supply. D a. Municipal water supply L LCy gal/day b. Well water supply gal/day c. Other (specify) gal/day d. Total water supply �000 gal/day 8. Waste discharge: a. Sanitary waste discharge 120 gal/day b. Uncontaminated cooling water discharge gal/day 1.) .... to sanitary sewer sal/day . 2.) .... to storm sewer sal/day ylJ, /� c. Industrial waste discharge r • r cgal/day d. Total discharge to sanitarysewer (Sa+gbl+gc) 1 i1y0c gal/day 9. SAC units: Total discharge (l30) 274 - 00 SAC Units /. 0- •�- 1 6 10. SAC Charge:1 DO 000 00 J�r1Q SAC Units (9) 30 X Unit s J~00 Charge rya=,2 s0I4 S SAC Charge � 7t" 11. Pretreatment: [Refer to Sections 5-5 and 5-6 of the Waste Control Rules andRegulations.) Does the Company plan any in -plant treatment of wastes? !ECL L[(`EA yes. describe 2015! 315' A �'(',TC_)A TPG Ric,inr (I�t T-t[ft.ivle 12. Sampling 6 Flow Measuring: [Refer to Section 5.9 of the • Waste Control Rules and Regulations.] Indicate location of sewer access Ani i alAP� point and describe flowmeter and means of sampling fT 'MTSt, ff)-ti F),r) ) {z(, Ru `rcbT P,.j T -L P.uA'IC H MicTriof) SANIP►,Ir1� �_i�OL)QI.�( G.PFl3 �ArIF1''S T!`•f=W61•t^�T ilii lti1CPCIsJC, �Y; Ile I. 13. Discharge Quality. 3,0 elk i/4 - C..30 m(DI- 0,0e ^GI&. /IZMI./L Resent Absent (Check appropriate tax) Constlhum .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... I......... .................... .......... V ..........Solids .......... Organics .......... Acids .......... Caustics .......... Temperature (greater than 150'F) .......... Cadmium .......... Chromium ......... Copper .......... Cyanide ..........Iron ..........Lead .......... Mercury .......... Nickel ......... Zinc .......... Phenols Grease and/or oil .......... Solvents Radioactive wastes ✓ V ] P.......... - MWCC-7717 ' 14. Additional Information. sketches or descriptions may be attached for the purpose of adequately describing the waste discharge. !!{{�'�� C CATION This is to certify that Ba oc; f yi �i� t^S� N 1 a agrees to comply with the rules (Co -mw Nuna) and regulations governing connection to and use of the Metropolitan Disposal System. including obtaining an Indus. trial discharge permit prior to th Compan�Signature of of ficial) Date 2) Trai 3) Approved by Metro Titan W s Control Com ission W 4zr-, % % ii�, Signature Title ��foY Date��S/s-f do 1` d► -7g /,.3 K,)ierJ s/3/H • �,ut • 5�31$0- OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 May 22, 1989 MR RICHARD NADEAU FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION MN DEPT OF ENERGY 8 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 150 E KELLOGG BLVD ROOM 900 ST PAUL MN 55101 Re: Certification For Entitlement Is Bonds City of Eagan Minnesota Dear Mr. Nadeau: of Industrial BEA SLON01=1 MOM THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Ca l Ma.nncs THOMAS HEDGES 01y A�ftclo EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE G4 Cy Enclosed is the City of Eagan's Certification to become an entitle- ment issuer of industrial development bonds in the State of Minnesota. The City of Eagan has chosen the program to become an entitlement issuer which is one alternative available under the allocation process adopted this year by the Minnesota Legisla- ture. The attached list of issues represent the bond transactions that were either publicly sold or privately placed. There are many other industrial development bond applications that received public hearings before the City Council and either have preliminary or final approval by the City of Eagan, however, official bonds were never issued. Those applications are not represented as a part of Certification and "the City of Eagan believes this is consistent with the intent of the Legislature. If other communities are including issues that are pending that were never officially issued, then the City of Eagan should be allowed to add those applications to its list for purposes of determining the entitlement amount. Thank you for your consideration regarding the Certification by to contact this office at any time. and if there are any questions the City of Eagan, feel free Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/jj cc: Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance; Paul Hauge, City Attorney THE LONE OAT( TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Ernie Clark, Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. CERTIFICATION • Pursuant to Minn. Laws 1984, ch. 582 15 to be codified as Minn. Stat. 474.18, subd. 2, the undersigned certify that City of (name of local issuer as de intd by Minn. Ea 5� (hereinafter the Laws 194 ch. 5H 3 tai' o becoo ified as Minn. Stat. 474.16, subd. 2) local issuer) issued obligations of a type subject to limitation under the terms Section 721 of the Tax Reform Bill of 1984, H.R. 4170, as reported by the Ways and Means Committee of the United States House of Representatives on March 5, 1984 (hereinafter "obligations") listed herein for each of the four preceeding calendar years. For each of the four preceeding calendar years list the total principal amount of obligations issued by any issuer within the geogra- phic boundaries covered by the local issuer. (For example, bonds issued by port authorities or redevelopment authorities operating within the geographic boundaries of the local issuer should be included in these totals) 1980 $11,678,000 • 1981 1,350,000 1982 1,250,000 1983 34,336,000 For each obligation issued by the local issuer, each of the four preceeding calendar years, list the following information: Description of Total Local Issuer Project with Date of Principal if other than Respect to which Issuance of Amount of Local Issuer the Obligation 1980 Obligation Obligation Listed above was issued 1981 1982 See Attached 1983 (Attach additional pages if necessary) The following authorized official is designated for contact by the Department of Energy and Economic Development: Name Thomas L Hedges Address 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 May 21, 1984 nate yOr May 21, 1984 Data A nay or Loca ssuer • 3/24/83 $3,325,000 9/17/83 111001000 10/1/83 1,815,000 None Unitog Rental Services - Rental laundry facility None Greaser Inc., - Office and Total Local Issuer Theodore A. Davies - Office Date of Principal if other than Description of Project With Issuance of Amount of Local Issuer Respect to which the Obligation Obligation Listed Above Obligation was Issued 5/9/80 $2,130,000 None Rosemount, Inc. - Office ' and manufacturing facility 7/15/80 848,000 None Elliott Auto Supply Co. - O£fice and warehouse facility 8/1/80 700,000 None DCR Company - Bowling alley expansion 12/19/80 5,500,000 None Economics Laboratory - Addn. to research and development facility 12/30/80 2,500,000 None Carson Pirie Scott Co. - 1980 Subtotal $11,678,000 Warehouse and showroom 3/5/81 $950,000 None Yankee Square Office I - Office Building - 9/28/81 400,000 None John Henry Foster Co. - 1981 Subtotal $1,350,000 Office and warehouse facility 8/25/82 $1,250,000 None Yankee Square Office III - Office Building •'��'' 1982 Subtotal $1,250,000 3/24/83 $3,325,000 9/17/83 111001000 10/1/83 1,815,000 12/14/83 1,391,000 12/30/83 705,000 12/30/83 20,000,000 12/30/83 6,000,000 1983 Subtotal 34,336,000 Grand Total $48,614,000 None Yankee Square Inn - Hotel None Hillcrest Development - Office building None Unitog Rental Services - Rental laundry facility None Greaser Inc., - Office and warehouse facility None Theodore A. Davies - Office and warehouse facility None Minnesota Jockey Club - Horse racing track and re- lated facilities None Minnesota Jockey Club - Horse racing track and related facilities 4.6 MEMO TO: CITY COUNCILMEMBER JERRY THOMAS, CHIEF OF POLICE JAY BERTHE, FIRE CHIEF BOB CHILDERS • FROM: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE: MAY 7, 1984 SUBJECT: MEETING TO DISCUSS NEW POLICY FOR RESCUE SQUAD CALLS A meeting was held on Monday, May 7, 1984, at Perkins Restaurant to discuss a new procedure that was initiated by the Police and Fire Departments regarding the type of calls that the Fire Department's rescue squad is called by the Police Department. Until December 31, 1983, the rescue squad would be called on most all accidents and medicals totalling some 350 during 1983. A study was made by Administration in both Departments and it was determined that many of the calls that were responded to by the rescue squad the Police were able to handle on a first response. It was determined by the Administration in both Depart- ments that the rescue squad response was not necessary and therefore would be limited to those emergencies where the dispatcher and/or police officer decide the rescue squad is necessary. City Councilmember Thomas, who asked for the meeting with City, Police and Fire Administration, stated that volunteers from the Fire Department are concerned that both medicals and accidents have occurred since January of 1984 when the rescue squad was • not called and more than likely should have been called by the police dispatchers. Councilmember Thomas provided several instances which included the following: 1. A January accident at T.H.13 and Cedar where cars were flipped due to an accident and victims were in need of backboards. There was no rescue squad called. 2. An accident in the general vicinity of Wescott and Pilot Knob in approximately February or March and there was no rescue called. 3. A concern was expressed regarding an infant who stopped breathing as to why three squads were taken off the street to respond to that problem when possibly one squad could have adequately handled the emergency. Other examples were cited and City Councilmember Thomas further explained that the rescue squad had provided a quick response in the past, has provided good public relations throughout the community and given people a security that an emergency team is available to help police assist in a first response to a medical or accident. He further expressed concern about a liability to the City if the rescue squad is not called when they could have been available for an accident or medical. Both Chief Berthe and Chief Childers stated that they, would • review the specific instances that were raised by City Councilmember Thomas as well as in detail the new procedure. Chief Childers • MEMO MAY 7, 1984 PAGE 2 stated that to date after four months in 1984 the rescue squad has been called nine times. The City Administrator asked that the Fire Department review the 350 calls last year to determine how many of those calls could have been eliminated in comparison to the policy that is in effect in 1984. Fire Chief Childers stated that he is concerned about having enough volunteer fire- fighters to man all three stations and if the same personnel are called out on 300-400 rescue calls, this could jeopardize the availability of manpower for operating all three stations. He also expressed a concern that the firefighters do not have enough emergency services training .if the rescue squad is going to be properly manned and respond to more calls. Fire Chief Childers also expressed a concern about adding more volunteers to the Department, especially station number one. He explained that this station has had a dramatic change in available volunteers due to a recent retirement of several firefighters. Both Police Chief Berthe and Fire Chief Childers stated that they would review in detail the procedure and provide some addition- al information on how this procedure is working in relationship to the concerns that were raised by City Councilmember Thomas and also specifically address the various incidents that were reported by City Councilmember Thomas. It was suggested by the City Administrator that a follow-up meeting be held to review the findings of both Chief Berthe and Chief Childers. (-\ \ " , '�' L ,') City Administratou► TLH/jj U 0 /691 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 19, 1984 EAGAN CITY HALL CITY ATTORNEY 1. Odell vs. City of Eagan 2. McCarthy Easements CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the "Engineering/Special Assessment Divisions" i 2. Capital Equipment Acquisition 3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins Addition l6q MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 18, 1984 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA The following items are to be considered as a part of the Adminis- trative Agenda: CITY ATTORNEY 1. ODELL VS. CITY OF EAGAN- As the City Council recalls the Minnesota Court of Appeals has overruled the Trial Court in the case of Odell vs. City of Eagan finding that the City Council did not have a valid basis for denying the preliminary plat. The appellant court accurately points out that the denial must be based upon sufficient reasons relative to the City Ordinance. In the case of the Odell Lots, the only apparent conflict with the Ordinance was in regard to the garage which exists within set -back requirements. The Court of Appeals has found that the garage was a non -conforming structure as distin- guished from a non -conforming use. In their opinion, the sub- division ordinance only addressed non -conforming uses unless, the garage was not a valid basis for denial. Therefore, the City Attorney is recommending that a resolution from the copies enclosed on pages 1'7.+ through _1 -7,5 -be considered based on the recent decision of the Court of Appeals. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To prove or deny the en- closed resolution. Expenses were incurred in the amount of $394.20 for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and $1528.51 for witnesses and other related expenses incurred by the appellants. The total cost for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals case was $1922.71. The Odells' requested that the City consider total payment, however, through negotiations and a dispute from the City Attorneys office on payment of those expenses the total amount has been lowered to $639.20. A motion is in order to consider payment in the amount of $394.20 to the State of Minnesota for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and to the Odell's in the amount of $245.00 with both payments totaling $639.20. /70 Administrative Agenda Information June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Two 2. McCarthy Easements The City Attorney, Director of Public Works and City Administrator are making efforts to gain a desirable settlements for various easements that are required for utility work through the McCarthy property. In an effort to negotiate a reduction of approximately $20,000 in interest costs, the City Attorney is planning to proceed with the first day of trial and will report to the City Council following the City Council tomorrow evening on the final status of the City as it relates to our negotiations with McCarthy's attorney. For a review of the easements which were discussed by City Attorney Hauge with Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmembers Smith and Wachter on Sunday evening, refer to pages 17 (. through 177 . Apparently, City Councilmember Thomas was unavailable as is City Councilmember Egan who is on vacation. CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1. Personnel Continuation of Internsh ecial Assessment Division" Within the As a part of the 1984 budget, an engineering intern was authorized for up to six months. Since this engineering intern is a civil engineer and has been assisting with engineering tech work and special assessments and due to the increased construction and activity within engineering, it is desirable to continue the internship for the remainder of 1984. The City Administrator has discussed the position with the Director of Public Works and feels the need is justified and is recommending consideration by the City Council. The City Administrator also asked the Direc for of Public Works to address the overall personnel needs in engineering/special assessments, realizing that these needs will be further addressed at the time of the 1985 budget development. The Director of Public Works has prepared a memorandum describing the intern needs at the present time and also the possibility of more permanent employment in the future. Enclosed on pages 1716 through 1190 is a copy of the memo as prepared by the Director of Public Works. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider approval or denial of an internship program in the engineering department for an additional six (6) months during calendar year 1984. 171 Administrative Agenda Information June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Three 2. Capital Equipment Acquisition As a part of the 1984 budget, a one ton dump truck with plow and sander and a 32,000 GVW dump truck with plow were given review, however final consideration was to be given during calendar year 1984 with the sale of equipment certificates. The Director of Public Works has requested that these two (2) vehicles be purchased during 1984 as explained in a memorandum enclosed on pages III through Ig2. . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an authorization for advertising for bids to consider the purchase of a four wheel drive one ton dump truck and a 34,000 GVW dump truck with front wing plow attachments with final approval and authorization of equipment certificates at the time the bid is awarded. Special Note: For additional information on this item, refer to page 48 of your 1984 budget. 3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters A license application was received from the Eagan Hockey Boosters for a combination gambling license to be used as a part of the July 4 festivities. Enclosed is a copy of a letter from a repre- sentative of the Eagan Hockey Boosters and the gambling license application. The organization is requesting a waiver of the license fee which is $25.00 and the $10,000 bond requirement. It is the tradition of the City Council that the bond requirement be waived, however, the license fee be collected to offset any administrative charges. P.i83 —111- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a combination gambling license as requested by the Eagan Hockey Boosters. r-7.1, Administrative Agenda Information June.19,.1984 City Council Meeting_ Page Four DIRECTOR OF'PUBLIC WORKS 1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins Addition The Robins Addition is located south of I-494 and west of T.H. 149 (old Dodd Road) incorporating east Blue Gentian Road. This prelimi- nary plat received approval from the Council in November of 1981 and has received two previous extensions which expire on June 15, 1984. They have requested a third extension to June 15, 1985, due to the fact that they have not yet completed the technical process associated with trading rights-of-way and property with MnDOT as a part of the progression of I-494. It is anticipated that all formal documents and agreements would be completed within the next 6 - 9 months which would allow them to proceed with their final plat prior to June of 1985. Due to the fact that this is the third request for an extension, the staff would recommend that it be the final extension and that the developers be so informed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third and final extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Robins Addition with the final expiration date of June 15, 1985. 1-73 RESOLUTION EAGAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE _, 1984 WHEREAS, an application was submitted by David and Patricia Odell in August of 1982 for a preliminary plat to split Lot 2, in McCarthy Ridge Addition into two single family lots exceeding the minimum size requirements for single family lots; and WHEREAS, in August and again on October 5, 1982, the Eagan City Council denied said application; and WHEREAS, the applicants, David and Patricia Odell, appealed to the Minnesota Court of Appeals from the Dakota County District Court's Order and Judgment finding in favor of the City of Eagan; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Court of Appeals determined in its decision filed May 8, 1984 that the Dakota County District Court should issue an Order directing the City Council to grant the applicants a preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the Dakota County District Court by an Order dated May 24, 1984 directed the City Council to grant approval of the appellants' preliminary plat of Odell Addition as submitted without further delay or appearance by the Odells; NOW THEREFORE, upon motion duly made �y by , it was RESOLVED as follows: and seconded 1. That the Eagan City Council be and hereby is on record approving the preliminary plat application of Odell Addition, subject to the following conditions: a. Park dedication requirements for the new lot shall be met by cash donation of the standard single family lot amount of $420.00. b. The preliminary plat shall be subject to Minnesota Department of Transportation's review and comment because the plat abuts State rights-of-way. C. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff. d. The applicant shall be required to provide sewer and water service to the. newly -created lot. e. Additional per lot trunk area assessments should be paid for the additional lot at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval for trunk area sanitary sewer and water area assessments as a condition of this plat approval. f. This development shall accept its financial responsibility for trunk area storm sewer assessments for one additional lot in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. g. Developer shall comply with all applicable City Code provisions. Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAGAN BY: 1-75- 2 Its: City Clerk HAucE, SB=. EIDE & FELLER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 9808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY FAGAN. MINNESOTA 89122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID D. KELLER June 18, 1984 Mr. Arnold Rempe Attorney at Law One Signal Hills Nest St. Paul, MN 55118 RE: Eagan - McCarthy Property Easements Dear Arnold: ARG COOL 812 T[LIPMONI 484-4224 On Sunday, June 17, 1984, we discussed proposed terms for the settlement of various easements from the McCarthy family running to the City of Eagan covering both the north 80 acre parcel lying generally north of Wescott Road and the south 70 acres south of Wescott Road. These terms gene rally.are as follows: 1. McCarthys will grant a pond easement for Hurley Lake at an 830 elevation, according to the legal description. 2. An easement for storm sewer utility purposes over the North 20 feet running westerly of Hurley Lake will also be granted. Temporarily a gravel access shall be used by the City over such easement for mainten- ance access to the storm sewer lift station. At such time as the property in the vicinity of Hurley Lake is developed, the City will remove the gravel service road and relocate the maintenance access to the lift station. 3. The City will relinquish the acquisition of the westerly arm of the Hurley Lake and quit claim that area to the McCarthys. 4. McCarthys will grant an easement for the northeasterly ponds within the south 70 acre parcel at approximately 830 elevation. 5. An easement will be granted for sanitary sewer trunk purposes across the south 70 acres as described by legal description in the condemnation action now in process. 6. A further easement for storm sewer trunk purposes lying parallel and within the 20 foot permanent sanitary sewer trunk easement, together with necessary temporary construction easement for trunk storm sewer and trunk sanitary sewer through approximately June 30, 1985 will be conveyed. 1-76 Arnold Kempe June 18, 1984 Page 2 7. An easement will be granted generally according to a sketch submitted to you on Friday, June 15, 1984, running from the Patrick Eagan Park Lake on the south, northerly to connect with the proposed storm sewer trunk consisting of a 20 foot wide permanent and necessary temporary construc- tion easement. 8. The water trunk easement appeal generally covering the north 80 acres will be dismissed by the McCarthys. It is understood that no other easements have formally been levied but that there are pending trunk area storm sewer assessments and that the McCarthys will not pursue appeals of those easements, although no committment by the McCarthys is made at the present time. 9. The City will pay the McCarthys $165,000.00 plus interest at the rate of 11% per annum computed since September 1981 at which time the City gained access for trunk storm sewer construction purposes on the north 80 acre property. All interest accrued on deposits made by the City with the Dakota County Clerk of District Court will be credited toward such interest. 10. The condemnation file 092213 covering Hurley Lake will be continued until a formal agreement is entered amongst the parties and upon execution of the agreement, that condemnation action will be dismissed as well as the sanitary sewer trunk condemnation file 096510. PHH:ras Very truly yours, HAUGE, SMITH, EIDE &.KELLER, P.A. Paul H. Hauge ' 177 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 19, 1984 EAGAN CITY HALL CITY ATTORNEY 1. Odell vs. City of Eagan 2. McCarthy Easements CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the "Engineering/Special Assessment Divisions" 2. Capital Equipment Acquisition 3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins Addition 16q MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 18, 1984 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA The following items are to be considered as a part of the Adminis- trative Agenda: CITY ATTORNEY 1. ODELL VS. CITY OF EAGAN- As the City Council recalls the Minnesota Court of Appeals has overruled the Trial Court in the case of Odell vs. City of Eagan finding that the City Council did not have a valid basis for denying the preliminary plat. The appellant court accurately points out that the denial must be based upon sufficient reasons relative to the City Ordinance. In the case of the Odell Lots, the only apparent conflict with the Ordinance was in regard to the garage which exists within set -back requirements. The Court of Appeals has found that the garage was a non -conforming structure as distin- guished from a non -conforming use. In their opinion, the sub- division ordinance only addressed non -conforming uses unless, the garage was not a valid basis for denial. Therefore, the City Attorney is recommending that a resolution from the copies enclosed on pages )7,+ through _175- be considered based on the recent decision of the Court of Appeals. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To prove or deny the en- closed resolution. Expenses were incurred in the amount of $394.20 for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and $1528.51 for witnesses and other related expenses incurred by the appellants. The total cost for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals case was $1922.71. The Odells' requested that the City consider total payment, however, through negotiations and a dispute from the City Attorneys office on payment of those expenses the total amount has been lowered to $639.20. A motion is in order to consider payment in the amount of $394.20 to the State of Minnesota for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and to the Odell's in the amount of $245.00 with both payments totaling $639.20. !-7o Administrative Agenda Information June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Two 2. McCarthy Easements The City Attorney, Director of Public Works and City Administrator are making efforts to gain a desirable settlements for various easements that are required for utility work through the McCarthy property. In an effort to negotiate a reduction of approximately $20,000 in interest costs, the City Attorney is planning to proceed with the first day of trial and will report to the City Council following the City Council tomorrow evening on the final status of the City as it relates to our negotiations with McCarthy's attorney. For a review of the easements which were discussed by City Attorney Hauge with Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmembers Smith and Wachter on Sunday evening, refer to pages 17 (� through 17'7_. Apparently, City Councilmember Thomas was unavailable as is City Councilmember Egan who is on vacation. ADMINISTRATOR 1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the "Engineering Special Assessment Division" As a part of the 1984 budget, an engineering intern was authorized for up to six months. Since this engineering intern is a civil engineer and has been assisting with engineering tech work and special assessments and due to the increased construction and activity within engineering, it is desirable to continue the internship for the remainder of 1984. The City Administrator has discussed the position with the Director of Public Works and feels the need is justified and is recommending consideration by the City Council. The City Administrator also asked the Direc for of Public Works to address the overall personnel needs in engineering/special assessments, realizing that these needs will be further addressed at the time of the 1985 budget development. The Director of Public Works has prepared a memorandum describing the intern needs at the present time and also the possibility of more permanent employment in the future. Enclosed on pages 1716 through 1130 is a copy of the memo as prepared by the Director of Public Works. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider approval or denial of an internship program in the engineering department for an additional six (6) months during calendar year 1984. 171 Administrative Agenda Information June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Three 2. Capital Equipment Acquisition As a part of the 1984 budget, a one ton dump truck with plow and sander and a 32,000 GVW dump truck with plow were given review, however final consideration was to be given during calendar year 1984 with the sale of equipment certificates. The Director of Public Works has requested that these two (2) vehicles be purchased during 1984 as explained in a memorandum enclosed on pages /,il through A-1-- ACTION -2. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an authorization for advertising for bids to consider the purchase of a four wheel drive one ton dump truck and a 34,000 GVW dump truck with front wing plow attachments with final approval and authorization of equipment certificates at the time the bid is awarded. Special Note: For additional information on this item, refer to page 48 of your 1984 budget. 3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters A license application was received from the Eagan Hockey Boosters for a combination gambling license to be used as a part of the July 4 festivities. Enclosed is a copy of a letter from a repre- sentative of the Eagan Hockey Boosters and the gambling license application. The organization is requesting a waiver. of the license fee which is $25.00 and the $10,000 bond requirement. It is the tradition of the City Council that the bond requirement be waived, however, the license fee be collected to offset any administrative charges. 0.193 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a combination gambling license as requested by the Eagan Hockey Boosters. Administrative Agenda Information June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Four DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins Addition The Robins Addition is located south of I-494 and west of T.H. 149 (old Dodd Road) incorporating east Blue Gentian Road. This prelimi- nary plat received approval from the Council in November of 1981 and has received two previous extensions which expire on June 15, 1984. They have requested a third extension to June 15, 1985, due to the fact that they have not yet completed the technical process associated with trading rights-of-way and property with MnDOT as a part of the progression of I-494. It is anticipated that all formal documents and agreements would be completed within the next 6 - 9 months which would allow them to proceed with their final plat prior to June of 1985. Due to the fact that this is the third request for an extension, the staff would recommend that it be the final extension and that the developers be so informed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third and final extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Robins Addition with the final expiration date of June 15, 1985. i-73 fr ✓�` LESOLUTION EAGAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE _, 1984 WHEREAS, an application was submitted by David and Patricia Odell in August of 1982 for a preliminary plat to split Lot 2, in McCarthy Ridge Addition into two single family lots exceeding the minimum size requirements for single family lots; and WHEREAS, in August and again on October 5, 1982, the Eagan City Council denied said application; and WHEREAS, the applicants, David and Patricia Odell, appealed to the Minnesota Court of Appeals from the Dakota County District Court's Order and Judgment finding in favor of the City of Eagan; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Court of Appeals determined in its decision filed May 8, 1984 that the Dakota County District Court should issue an Order directing the City Council to grant the applicants a preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the Dakota County District Court by an Order dated May 24, 1984 directed the City Council to grant approval of the appellants' preliminary plat of Odell Addition as submitted without further delay or appearance by the Odells; MA NOW THEREFORE, upon motion duly made �y . it was RESOLVED as follows: and seconded 1. That the Eagan City Council be and hereby is on record approving the preliminary plat application of Odell Addition,. subject to the following conditions: a. Park dedication requirements for the new lot shall be met by cash donation of the standard single family lot amount of $420.00. b. The preliminary plat shall be subject to Minnesota Department of Transportation's review and comment because the plat abuts State rights-of-way. C. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff. d. The applicant shall be required to provide sewer and water service to the.newly-created lot. e. Additional per lot trunk area assessments should be paid for the additional lot at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval for trunk area sanitary sewer and water area assessments as a condition of this plat approval. f. This development shall accept its financial responsibility for trunk area storm sewer assessments for one additional lot in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. g. Developer shall ,comply with all applicable City Code provisions. Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAOAN BY: 175' 2 Its: City Clerk HAUGE, SMITH. EIDE & HELLER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 9808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN. MINNESOTA 88122 PAUL M. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIOE DAVID O. KELLER Mr. Arnold Rempe Attorney at Law One Signal Hills Hest St. Paul, MN 55118 HE: Eagan - McCarthy Property Easements Dear Arnold: June 18, 1984 ARRA COD[ 012 T[LIJHON[ 4x4.4224 On Sunday, June 17, 1984, we discussed proposed terms for the settlement of various easements from the McCarthy family running to the City of Eagan covering both the north 80 acre parcel lying generally north of Wescott Road and the south 70 acres south of Wescott Road. These terms generally are as follows: 1. McCarthys will grant a pond easement for Hurley Lake at an 830 elevation, according to the legal description. 2. An easement for storm sewer utility purposes over the North 20 feet running westerly of Hurley Lake will also be granted. Temporarily a gravel access shall be used by the City over such easement for mainten- ance access to the storm sewer lift station. At such time as the property in the vicinity of -Hurley Lake is developed, the City will remove the gravel service road and relocate the maintenance access to the lift station. 3. The City will relinquish the acquisition of the westerly arm of the Hurley Lake and quit claim that area to the McCarthys. 4. McCarthys will grant an easement for the northeasterly ponds within the south 70 acre parcel at approximately 830 elevation. 5. An easement will be granted for sanitary sewer trunk purposes across the south 70 acres as described by legal description in the condemnation action now in process. 6. A further easement for storm sewer trunk purposes lying parallel and within the 20 foot permanent sanitary sewer trunk easement, together with necessary temporary construction easement for trunk storm sewer and trunk sanitary sewer through approximately June 30, 1985 will be conveyed. Arnold Rempe June 18, 1984 Page 2 7. An easement will be granted generally according to a sketch submitted to you on Friday, June 15, 1984, running from the Patrick Eagan Park Lake on the south, northerly to connect with the proposed storm sewer trunk consisting of a 20 foot wide permanent and necessary temporary construc- tion easement. 8. The water trunk easement appeal generally covering the north 80 acres will be dismissed by the McCarthys. It is understood that no other easements have formally been levied but that there are pending trunk area storm sewer assessments and that the McCarthys will not pursue appeals of those easements, although no committment by the McCarthys is made at the present time. 9. The City will pay the McCarthys $165,000.00 plus interest at the rate of 11% per annum computed since September 1981 at which time the City gained access for trunk storm sewer construction purposes on the north 80 acre property. All interest accrued on deposits made by the City with the Dakota County Clerk of District Court will be credited toward such interest. 10. The condemnation file 092213 covering Hurley Lake will be continued until a formal agreement is entered amongst the parties and upon execution of the agreement, that condemnation action will be dismissed as well as the sanitary sewer trunk condemnation file 096510. PHH:ras Very truly yours, HAUGE, SMITH, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. Paul H. Hauge 177 MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JUNE 15, 1984 SUBJECT: PERSONNEL NEEDS - ENGINEERING/SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIVISIONS As the City continues to grow so does the demand for services of the Public Works Department through its Engineering and Special Assessment Divisions. I have recently analyzed our workload requirements and our available personnel in the Special Assessment Division and have determined that there currently is a greater workload than can be handled by the existing 1.5 employees. Not only does the Special Assessment Division tabulate, spread, certify and keep track of all final assessments associated with public improvement contracts, but they are constantly requested to provide information pertaining to past, present and pending assessments everytime the ownership of a parcel changes. As an example, every building permit issued through the Building Inspection Department (which appears to be record setting each year) requires a special assessment search and history on that particular parcel by the builder, realtor or property owner. In addition to these, every subdivision or lot split of an existing parcel that either occurs at the County without our knowledge or is processed through the City through our platting procedures, require a subdivision of the records pertaining to assessments along with a special assessment search as requested by the existing and new property owners. While both of these items are associated with growth and development of property, there is also the resale of existing property that requires the same amount of research in response to those requests. In 1983, approximately 1,500 special assessment searches had to be performed. The 1983 Annual Report can provide further documentation to the work-related statistics associated with this Division. Assuming that the City's growth will no longer continue, present manpower is necessary to maintain the records and provide the information for the parcels currently existing within the City. Assuming a fairly steady rate of growth with the projected comple- tion of the interstate and available land to be developed, addi- tional personnel is required to insure that this future development occurs in an orderly manner to protect the City's financial interests associated with the public improvements necessary to accommodate this growth. One of the most important steps in the development process is the final plat application. It is at this point that the City performs considerable research to determine outstanding past and future assessment obligations. In addition, it is when legal descriptions, street names, addresses, utility/ponding easements, and City files and records are created which become the permanent basis for the City's information system. Presently, this final MEMO TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR JUNE 15, 1984 PAGE TWO plat process has been performed by the Public Works Director with limited assistance being available from the Engineering and Special Assessment Divisions. Subsequently, this process is not being followed through with the degree of accuracy that is necessary to protect the financial integrity of the City's operations along with eliminating corrective work by other City personnel at a later date which is time consuming and..inefficient based on our work loads and time available. The Engineering Division currently consists of the Assistant City Engineer and two engineering technicians. One technician handles all the administrative functions associated with street lights, subdivision financial guarantees, as -built files, drainage com- plaint investigations, etc. The other technician performs the technical field work associated with inspections, surveying, pond elevations, drafting, quantity calculations, etc. With the Assistant City Engineer being responsible for 15-20 private developments within the City, grading permits applications, review of new subdivision applications and related technical plans, etc., the miscellaneous map updating, easement record keeping, general assistance for research projects, etc. is presentlybeing performed by a temporary intern position authorized with the 1984 budget which expires July 1. With the sealcoating program expand- ing each year, street striping, traffic counts, greater accuracy in easement acquisition/recording, inspection of in-house developed contracts, the Engineering Division will be severely short staffed if this intern position is terminated on July 1. Therefore, I would like to request serious consideration of authorizing the continuation of this intern program through the completion of 1984 so that a more detailed analysis can be performed for justification of requesting a full-time engineering technician position as a part of the 1985 budget process. The continuation: of this intern position and the hopeful evolution into a full-time, permanent technician position would provide considerable assistance to both the Engineering and the Special Assessment Divisions in the final plat process and all related documentation requirements. Please take into consideration the fact that a considerable amount time spent by this intern has been charged to City contracts which will be reimbursed through the 278 overhead portion of the special assessments. Therefore, I am confident that a continuation of this position through the comple- tion of 1984 will not create a financial burden to the general budget and will greatly increase the Public Works Department's ability to provide the level of service that is being demanded by the growing public in Eagan. While I realize that this memo appears to be excessive in length, I assure you its brevity is a shortcoming to an adequate explanation 179 MEMO TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR JUNE 15, 1984 PAGE THREE of the level of service and detail associated with the work require- ments currently being encountered by the Public Works Department and certainly to be expanded as the City continues to grow. Therefore, please inform me if we can receive the authorization to continue this intern position through 1984 so that I can inform the individual involved. Any additional information that may be necessary will be gladly and promptly forwarded to your attention as requested. Respectfully submitted, � jS�1���C!'t>� homas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/kf cc: Rich Hefti, Assistant City Engineer Ann Goers, Special Assessment Clerk !80 MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: JUNE 15, 1984 SUBJECT: CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION - PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE - REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLES #101 & #113 As a part of the 1984 budget, I submitted to the City Council for consideration a request to replace two existing vehicles in the Public Work Street Maintenance Division. These vehicles are identified as follows: VEHICLE #101. This is a 1976 Ford 1/2 ton pickup truck which presently has 94,000 miles on it. Because of its limited weight capacity, this vehicle is used primarily for manpower transportation and parts running. Except for our larger pieces of equipment (graders, dump trucks, etc.), this is the oldest vehicle in the Public Works Maintenance Division. Due to its mileage, age and body condition, limited repairs have been performed and this vehicle has been relegated to nominal usage. VEHICLE #113. This vehicle is i 1972 International Harvester 34,000 G.V.W. dump truck. This 12 year old vehicle has 95,700 miles with a deteriorating body. It is the oldest maintenance vehicle in our fleet and is quickly deteriorating through the heavy use that it receives in our gravel road and snow removal maintenance programs. Similar to vehicle #112, which was re- placed in 1983, this vehicle is starting to experience substan- tial repair work at inopportune times (snow plowing) which restricts its dependability and reliability for emergency snow removal services. In recommending the replacement for these vehicles, the Superinten- dent of Streets and myself have taken into consideration the maximum flexibility of various vehicles and the overall needs of the Maintenance Division. Based on our review, we concur with our previous request to receive authorization to purchase the following vehicles: REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLE #101. This replacement is proposed to be a small 4 wheel drive one ton dump truck with plow and sander to augment our cul-de-sac snow removal fleet and provide additional ice control with another sanding unit. This vehicle would be identical to the two vehicles purchase in 1983 for our cul-de-sac snow removal fleet. Last winter's record snow falls proved these vehicles to be well worth the investment and greatly increased our cul-de-sac snow removal efficiency as compared to previous vehicles. In addition, their ability to perform sanding for effective ice control proved their MEMO TO THOMAS L. HEDGES JUNE 15, 1984 PAGE 2. flexibility to be a valuable piece of equipment. The estimated cost of this vehicle with the plow and sander is approximately $19,500. An estimated $500 trade in for existing vehicle #101 has been taken into consideration in the estimated cost. REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLE #113. This replacement vehicle would be of like kind to vehicle #113. It would be a 34,000 G.V.W. dump truck complete with front and wing plow attachments. This would be the similar specifications for the vehicle that was approved for acquisition in 1983. This vehicle is large enough to handle our mainline snow plowing and ice control needs and yet small enough to provide maximum flexibility for year round seasonal use such as street patching with our new tailgate paver, gravel road maintenance, etc. The estimated cost of this vehicle with related plow attachments is'approxi- mately $53,000. This takes into consideration a $3,000 trade in for existing vehicle #113. As the Council may recall, with winter's heavy snow accumulation and poor condition of our older. pieces of equipment, there were times when 408 of our snow removal fleet was unavailable, inactive or under repair. In addition, with last year's replacement vehicles being ordered in the end of July, we have yet to receive our large dump truck due .to the lead time required to manufacture these specialized pieces of equipment. Therefore, I would like to strongly urge the City Council to give serious consideration to approving this request so that advertise- ment for bids can be initiated as soon as possible to try and insure that these new vehicles would be available for our snow removal program of 1984 - 85. I would be happy to review any of the vehicles with yourself or the City Council, at your convenience, to discuss in further detail our reasons and justifications for requesting replacement at this time. Please let me know if any additional information is necessary for consideration of this item by the City Council at their meeting on June 19, 1984. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert TAC:jbd CC: Bill Branch, Superintendent of Streets/Equipment 19�, NEWSLETTER FAGAM Hockey Boosters, Inc. Volume: Number: Date: -jL,..2 Q 1C I � �� 7011M #OCKFY FOR FAGAM AND SUR R OUMD/NG COMM MI FS& c;Ty 43� �-C'� C, 6 M 010 O i 4.Cb-y $o 4S E/LS IS 3 I Fee: Annual: Event Only CITY OF EAGAN BINGO AND/OR GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION Date Submitted: APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS PRIOR TO EVENT. Type of License(s) requested: Bingo Paddlewheel Tipboard Raffle X cam" kr_f -t s-+ Name of Organization: � c, a � ..r v} , eke., do,.cTaier I, and I 40n4a.- zation Name of Designated Bingo and/( Gambling Manager, /o -1 - q5 (first, middle, last) Manager -Date of Birth Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct the game(s) indicated above in accordance with the provisions of the City of Eagan's Ordinance No. 70 and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349. Authorized OfficePr of Organization ...Designated Bingo and/or Gambling Manager of Organizatic A. The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer of the organization: ��// 1 1. TRUE NAME: ^oT �L,., ��, w �l�A L F_0 v4vLS Last First FullMiddle 2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: ,ck -3 a� Street City St a zip 3. DATE OF BIRTH: / c // 4. PLACE OF BIRTH: N i&.,v MOnth,Da ,Year City,Sta vs?tf. S. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No_ If yes, explain B. The following is to be completed by the designated bingo and/or gambling manager of the organization: 1. TRUE NAME: E/2�Zx 40,✓ D A-c.t- dF6aZ,•%0A_77'f Last First FullMiddle 2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: 39(40 �LLMVLE 6)"AAJ YN1pj Street City State zip 3. DATE OF BIRTH: (o aG Y7)_4. PLACE OF BIRTH: WiZLjN/}�t Month,Day,Year City,S—tate 5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No If yes, explain 6. How long have you been a member of the organization?_ 7. Are you gambling manager for any other organization? �O 8. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action designating you bingo and/or gambling manager. I`G9' GAME INFORMATION: 1. �p Plac[,(e where games will be/�played' �a. }� „i Sc `-.00 L r q K k l C( / I 1 �CnN fpS1 bJG 0.4 -Q9=1N �1�NN S-3 /Q Street Cit State Zip 2. Are premises owned or leased by sponsoring organization? 3. Date or dates games will be played Date and/or da (s) of week 4. Hours of the day games will be played:From_LL__A.M. to P.M. —A. M. tofI_P.M. 5. Maximum number of players V000 6. Number and value of prizes to be awarded ORGANIZATION INFORMATION: 1. Address where regular meetings are held I3$r/ bf0paKk Street City 2. Day and time of meetings -i.. [ s 7 3 o ,0 ,.. — hyT cA h., I b� 3. Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota? Yes x No 4. How long has the organization been in existence? 12 5. How many members in the organization? b 6. � What is the pLLu��rpose of the organization? 1'ac v,•CQp ax r k. 7. -E ul c=3_on- 7 X YOfficers�ofwthe Organization: NAME ADDRESS (street,city,zirl / TITLE 8 wive names or officers or any other persons paid for services to the organization: NAME ADDRESS (3treet,city, ziFl TITLE 9. In whose custody will organization records be kept? n NAME ADDRESS .a ).$4 It j'/ c1 street,city,state,zip SS7� Business Telephone Number `( SS / O Home Telephone Number jqs' 10. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate the players in the event any injury is sustained by played while participating in the bingo and/or gambling game, or while on the licensed premises, please state the: -' NAME OF INSURER Dy aHl I( POLICY NO 11. Have you (Manager and Officer) read, and do you thoroughly under- stand the provisions of all lacus, ordinance, and regulations governing the operation of bingo and/or gambling games?' 12. Attach a list of aIll active members of the organization. I declare that the information I have provided on this application is truth- ful, and I authorize the City of Eagan to investigate the information sub- mitted. Also, I have received from the City of Eagan a copy of the City Ordinance No. 70 relating to bingo and/or gambling, d I have familiarized myself with the contents and requirements therof. y ) n==,., S, K1c �, N jLk , Signature of authorize o ficer of the organizat — Dace I Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this day of Signature of Notary Public Commission expires on Signature of designated bingo and/or gambling manager of organization. Date Subscribed and sworn to me a notary public on -this day of Signature of Notary Public Commission expires on PLEASE PRINT Date: June S, L91* NAME J; W1 �p,e L N�PrrfG�'� `V-�, IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK PLEASE SIGN HERE 37so So. l e,e we Tart z�- SDs • C • AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL JUNE 5, 1984 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL 6 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA S APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Fire Department B. Police Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA C. Park S Recreation Department D. Public Works Department p.v A. Contractor Licenses 5 B. Personnel Items G C. Contract 83-13, Final Payment/Acceptance (Park Ridge Addition, et' al) �.(o D. Contract 83-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Treatment Plant Utilities) E. Contract 84-8, Approve Williams Pipeline Encroachment 1 Agreement g F. National Flag Day p.JOG. Resignation of Douglas McNeely/Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Member Pp.11 -H. Contract 83-5, Approve Change order 01 (Water Treatment Plant - Utilities and Streets) F.171- I. Contract 83-5, Change Order o2 (Water Treatment Plant - Streets and Utilities) j3 J. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition) K. Contract 83-1, Change Order 05, Water Treatment Plant (Control Valves) p15 L. Final Plat Application, Century Addition Y 11M. Final Plat Application, Suncliff 2nd Addition f.IyN. Final Plat Application, Holmes Addition rs10. Grading Permit Application, Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd Addition z1 -P. Final Plat P Application, Safari Addition -LiQ. Project 411, Review Request/Authorize Feasibility Report, P Patrick Eagan Park (Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) V. T:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS p 1.5 A. Project 404, Lexington Place South (Streets 6 Utilities) 1 63 B. Project 400, Oak Cliff Pond (Lift Station 6 Force Main Outlet) p,jLC. Project 398, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Streets d Utilities) (Continued from 5-15-84 Meeting) p.91 D. Vacate Utility Easment, Lakeside Estates P.0 E. Vacate Street Easement, Twinview Manor 2nd Addition 1 VI. VII. IR X. RI. OLD.BUSINESS p 95 A. Alan J. 8 Baerbel C. Draenckhahn for Rezoning from A • I (Agricultural District) to RB (Roadside Business District) Consisting of Approximately .68 Acres in Part of the SE1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 4, T -27N, R -23W (Will be continued J to a future City Council meeting) �p}l B. Contract 84-11, Approve Plans 6 Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Oak Cliff Pond) NEW BUSINESS 101 A. Sienna Corporation (Rod Hardy) for Preliminary Plat, Birch P Park Addition, Consisting of Approximately 43 Acres a Containing 77 Dwelling Units in Outlots B, C, D, E and F, Windcrest 2nd Addition P. 110 B. Corporate Construction for Waiver of Plat to Split a Duplex Lot for Individual Ownership, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition, Lot 2, Block 1, in the SW 1/2, Section 25 i 'p.115 C. Suncliff Development Company for a Variance from the Sideyard Setback Along a Public Street, Suncliff 1st Addition, in the NW 1/4 of Section 29 D. NW. Mutual Life Insurance for a Resolution Providing for a Concurrent Detachment and Annexation of Incorporated Land, in the N 1/2 of Section 3 ADDITIONAL ITEMS 133 A. Municipal Center Landscaping • p r3`i B. Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission p13(,C. Contract 84-6, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for p Bids (Sealcoating) 13j D. Contract 84-14, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for P AA Bids (Lexington Place 2nd Addition s Lexington Place South) E. Contract 84-15, Approve Plans/Aurhorize Advertisement for P Bids (SunCliff 2nd Addition) VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) ADJOURNMENT 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 31, 1984 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION MEMO FOR JUNE 5, 1984, CITY COUNCIL MEETING After approval of the May 15, 1984, regular City Council minutes and special City Council meeting minutes for December 22, 1983, January 10, 1984, March 27, 1984 and May 24, 1984, and the agenda for the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting, the following items are in order for consideration. •DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Fire Department -- There are no items to be considered under Fire Department at this time. B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered under Police Department at this time. C. Parks and Recreation Department -- There are ,no items to be considered under Parks and Recreation Department at this time. • D. Public Works Department -- There are no items to be considered under Public Works Department at this time. 1-1 L Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Two There are seventeen (17) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council desires to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the consent agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTORS' LICENSE A. Contractors' License -- The City has received contractor license applications for contractors who do work in the City of Eagan and seven -county metropolitan area. All of these contrac- ors are considered reliable according to the Protective Inspections Department. The necessary documents and fees have been submitted and it is the recommendation of the Chief Building Inspector that the contractors' licenses be approved. Enclosed on pages Swc is a"copy of the list of proposed contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the contractor license list as presented. • • 0 • MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE. PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: www ��` JUNE 1, 1984 RE: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE PER CITY CODE 6.42 The following lists of contractors have been doing work in the City of Eagan, in the seven county metro area, and are considered reliable. They have submitted the necessary documents and fees and I would recommend that they be licensed to be a contractor in the City of Eagan. DP/nlb • J 3 FOR JUNE 5 1984 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: GENERAL CONTRACTORS: 1. Al's Construction 2. Bjorklund Construction Co. 3. Colorcraft Corp. 4• Custom Energy Homes 5. Floodmaster Engineering Corporation 6. Kraus Anderson 7. Michael Construction, Inc. 8• Ordeen Splittstoser Cont., Inc. 9• Mike Rvgh Homes 10. Ken Smith'Remodeling 11, Stinar Corporation 12. Yankee Doodle Associates HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR: 1. Mark Alberty 2. Linda 6 George Myhre HEATING 6 VENTILATING CONTRACTORS: 1. Farmington plumbing d Heating 2. Churchill's Home Heating/Cooling. Inc. SWIMMI� POOLS: 1. Fools, Inc. .'l ry�i'i •I. I.Id �TC'�I �. �. • C� Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1989, City Council Meeting • Page Three PERSONNEL ITEMS B. Personnel Items -- The following Personnel Items are to be considered: 1) The City has retained Mr. Robert Wieken as a mechanical inspector on a contractual basis to assist the Protective Inspections Department with building inspections. Unfortunately, Mr. Weiken, who is semiretired, is undergoing surgery and is unable to perform inspection services for the City. Due to the volume of inspections, it was necessary to contact Mr. John Vujovich, who was the chief building inspector in Inver Grove Heights and is retired, to assist until Mr. Weiken returns to the City as an inspector. Mr. Vujovich will be hired as a consultant under the same arrangement as Mr. Weiken and will work at the pleasure of the chief building inspector. Mr. Vujovich did assist the City of Eagan during the summer of 1983 and is very familiar with the inspection schedules and the City. • • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To retain Mr. John Vujovich as a contractual building inspector to perform building inspection services in the absence of Mr. Robert Weiken. 2) The City has approved a part-time clerk typist which will be included in the clerical pool, bringing the total manpower to 1.5 in the City Hall clerical pool. The advertisements, interviews and selection process has been completed and is the recommendation of the Administrative Assistant, Holly Duffy, that Shelly Lysne be hired as 'a part-time clerk typist to serve the clerical pool under the supervision of the Department of Administration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the temporary services of Mr. John Vujovich and the hiring of a part-time employee, Shelly Lysne. S Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Four -13, FINAL PAYMENT/PARK RIDGE ADDITION C. Contract 83-13, Final Payment/Acceptance (Park Ridge Addition, Et Al.) -- We have received a request for final payment from our consulting engineering firm along with a Certification of Compliance to previously approved plans and specifications for the installation of trunk watermain within Covington Lane in the Park Ridge Addition and a sanitary sewer lateral to service the Robert B. Lewis House for Battered Women on Nicols Road. Final inspections have been performed and verified by representa- tives of the Public Works Maintenance Division with the end product found to be acceptable for perpetual maintenance by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third and final payment of $4,108.58 to S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc., for Contract 83-13 and accept for perpetual maintenance. CONTRACT 83-5, FINAL PAYMENT/TREATMENT PLANT UTILITIES D. Contract 83-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Treatment Plant Utilities) -- We have received a request for final payment from our consulting engineering firm along with a certification of compliance to previously approved plans and specifications for the installation of transmission watermains from the existing wells to the future treatment plant along with sanitary sewer, storm sewer and first phase street improvements to service the water treatment plant and adjacent benefited properties. Final inspections and acceptance has been performed or reviewed by Public Works Maintenance personnel and found to be in order for consideration of acceptance for perpetual maintenance. The final contract amount takes into consideration the approval of Change Orders #1 and #2 listed as additional agenda items under the Consent Agenda for the June 5 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the seventh and final pay request for Contract 83-5 in the amount of $8,516.56 to Northdale Construction Company and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. r • • FJ Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Five It CONTRACT 84-8/WILLIAMS PIPELINE ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT E. Contract 84-8, Approve Williams Pipeline Encroachment Agreement - With the development of the Westbury and Lexington Square Additions, several public improvements had to be initiated to provide the proper utilities for these developments. These consisted of Contracts 84-2 (Wescott Trunk Sanitary Sewer), Contract 84-8 (Westbury and Lexington Square Trunk and Lateral Utilities and Streets) and Contract 84-9 (Lexington Avenue Trunk Watermain). Each of these contracts required the construction of a utility across the existing Williams Brothers Pipeline easement which traverses across the McCarthy property, through the Westbury Addition and proceeds easterly along the southside of Wescott Road, crossing Lexington Avenue. Subsequently, because this exclusive easement of Williams Pipeline requires written permission from the company prior to any construction activity within that easement, it is necessary for the City to enter into an "Easement Encroachment Agreement" with the Williams Pipeline Company. An agreement was prepared by Williams Brothers which authorizes the property owner (Lexington South Incorporated), the developer (Gabbert Development Inc.) and the City to perform grading and utility/street construction work within their easement. Because of the grade changes associated with the development, their standard • policy would have required the pipelines to be relocated to the proper elevation at an estimated cost of $55,000. In lieu of this pipe relocation, they have agreed to accept the addition fill beyond their standard limits in consideration for the City accepting "all direct or indirect increased cost, including but not limited to additional labor, materials, street and trailway repairs, or other damages, arising out of the existance of said improvements, and elevation and grade changes" required by the City's and development's construction activities. The Public Works Director cannot find evidence of a similar agree- ment being entered into between the City and Williams Pipeline for previous pipeline crossings. It appears that this will be the first formal agreement and could be precedent setting for future construction activities. However, it is necessary before authorization can be granted to perform this work. All the above - referenced contracts have already been let and the contractor has proceeded with construction operations on other areas outside these pipeline easements. After review of the agreement by the Public Works Director and City Attorney, it is recommended that the Council approve the agreement and authorize its execution. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the easement • encroachment agreement for Williams Pipeline Company and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 7 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Six NATIONAL FLAG DAY F. National Flag Day -- The City has received a sample Proclamation from the National Flag Day Committee in Baltimore, Maryland, asking that June 14 be recognized as National Flag Day. Enclosed on pageCJ is a copy of a Proclamation for National Flag Day, June 14, 1984. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To proclaim National Flag Day, June 14, 1984. Pi C, J 0 Flag Day Informatl*on w0=91MMSESM1�1 .•.�:Mi,^:'i:'.'Ar�:'::.i•.it:�iMh'1t":'+',Ccti A.�•;t• National Flag DayCommittee418 South Broadway i.✓<.ear•+.YF:A!'!Is..CW`liWi.-•'IUY�KY/Wi'+::• :•iYYW,+•.�K ill?JI'.?Y1L'i,-[:it{a!��' Baltimore. Maryland 21231 Pause For The Pledge of Allegiance SAMPLE PROCLAMATION 481A NATIONAL FLAG DAY, JUNE 14, 1984 WHEREAS, by Act of the Congress of the United States, dated June 14, 1777, the first official flag of the United States was adopted, and WHEREAS, by Act of Congress, dated August 3, 1949, June 14 of each year was designated "National Flag Day" and the Star-Spangled Banner Flag House • Association in Baltimore, Maryland, has been the official sponsor since 1952 of National Flag Day for the United States, and • WHEREAS, on June 14, 1980, the Star-Spangled Banner Flag House Association developed a national campaign to encourage all Americans to PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE of Allegiance as part of National Flag Day ceremonies, and WHEREAS, since this concept caught the imagination of Americans everywhere and has received wide citizen support and recognition, there has now been created the National Flag Day Foundation, Inc. in Baltimore, Maryland to plan the nations Flag Day ceremonies. WHEREAS, Flag Day celebrates our nation's symbol of unity and stands for our country's devotion to freedom to the rule of all and the equal rights of all. NOW, THEREFORE, I, (your name and title), do hereby proclaim June 14, 1984 as Flag Day in (your state), and urge all citizens of (your state) to pause at 7:00 P. M. (EDT) on this date for the Fourth Annual PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE, and recite with all Americans the Pledge of Allegiance to our Flag and Nation. 9 A Prnpram of the Natinnal Flae Dav Foundation. Inc.. Baltimore. Maryland. • E • Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Seven ADVISORY PARKS RESIGNATION/DOUGLAS MCNEELY G. Resignation of Douglas McNeely/Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission Member -- Enclosed is a letter from Douglas McNeely, copies on page // submitting his resignation as a member of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. The City Adminis- trator would like to discuss briefly a replacement for Mr. McNeely at the time the Consent Agenda is handled or later in the meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation letter of Douglas McNeely, a member of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. /O _cy 24, 1984 • The Honorable i-lyor end Ci*T, Council of Eagan Nr. Yom Hedgcs, City Administrator - 12r. Iien Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation h'--mbers of the Advisory narks and Recreation Commission Dear I•'adams and Gentlemen: Congratulations on the successful passing of the bond referendum. This will enhanco the city of Eagan and bring us That much closer to the standards that were set in the gaster Parks Pian. I write you today to ask that you accent my i=mediate resignation from the Advisory Parks and Rocreation Commission. Such thought h" gone into t --"-is decision. As you 1,sow, I began- a now occupation last November in bar',cing which rcouires travel time. So far in 1984, I have missed over half of the meetings including sub-committoo and special meetings. Even though the minutes arc prep_arcd in an. cxcellent m.^,rner, much is missed in the form of discussion and debate. I have a1w, ys bccn c believor in giving 1Q0" of your^elf to anything you ene::Rver. In thi: cno- I cC:_1'.ot. Y�4., afore, 1 -.Ch that Pau rGDl ^.Ce M3 with .n per Gon P^e c. ^n commit -,nd Cttcnd. I Lar mnnv fond n3raorias pad hav-- m.a.dc _-,ny fino nccuni:aancies duri- thn pact th_ec and one half years. In my opinion., i:o have the finost ;mayor, City Council, Cit;=dmir-istrator, Director of Parks and Recreation, .,dvisory Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission and city staff^ny populus could hon-- for. • If at nny time I ray be of service to the city of Eagan please don't hesitate to give de a call. Once again let me thank you for your patience and cooperation and keep up the good work. Sinceroly yours, Douglas C. McNeely P.S. Please advise me :;en if you want my copy of the Master Par'.cs Plan back. 0 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Eight CONTRACT 83-5, CHANGE ORDER/WATER TREATMENT PLANT H. Contract 83-5, Approve Change Order #1 (Water Treatment Plant - Utilities and Streets), -- Change Order #1 provides for a change in the scope of the contract to delete a portion of the storm sewer laterals to service the future Water Treatment Plant parking lot due to a conflict of scheduling activities between the treatment plant general contractor and this utility contractor. Because of the completion time frame for the City contract, it was not possible for the storm sewer lateral to be constructed. However, the contractor had purchased the materials which were delivered to the site and subsequently secured and stored by City personnel. Therefore, the original installation of this storm sewer lateral is being deleted from the contract. However, the contractor is being paid for the materials that have been delivered. Admin- istratively the proper way to handle this transaction is through a change order to the standard contract. Change Order #1 provides for an addition to the standard contract amount of $1,465.76 for the materials only. The reduction in payment for the deletion of the actual- installation will be accounted for in the final close out of the contract by a reduction in final payment quantity. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order • #1 to Contract 83-5 in the amount of $1,465.76 (ADD) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. E CONTRACT 83-5, CHANGE ORDER #2/WATER TREATMENT PLANT I. Contract 83-5, Change Order #2 (Water Treatment Plant -- Streets and Utilities) -- During the jacking of the trunk watermain underneath Yankee Doodle Road to connect the well sealed to the Water Treatment Plant, the contractor encountered a Northwestern Bell Telephone manhole vault. The location of this telephone manhole had not been located by Northwestern Bell at either the design or the construction phase of the work and subsequently its existence was not known until the contractor hit it on his jacking operations. Subsequently, the contractor was delayed for eight working hours until Northwestern Bell could perform the modifications to the manhole to allow us to proceed with our construction phase. Subsequently, the City's contractor has submitted a claim for $1,624 for down time delay and remobiliza- tion costs which amount to $1,624. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #2 to Contract 83-5 in the amount of $1,624 (ADD) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /1, Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Nine L I ORDER PUBLIC HEARING/ST. FRANCIS WOODS 3RD ADDITION J. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition) -- We have received a petition to vacate a portion of the drainage and utility easement across Lots 1, 2, 5 and 6, of Block 2, St. Francis Wood 3rd Addition as shown on the map enclosed on page // The vacation of this drainage and utility easement is requested to allow a better location of the townhouse units within these blocks due the con- straints imposed upon these building sites by the existing ponding area located at the rear of these lots. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and order the public hearing to vacate drainage and utility ease- ments over Lots 1, 2, 5 and 6 of Block 2, St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition to be held on , July , 1984. CONTRACT 83-1, CHANGE ORDER #5/WATER TREATMENT PLANT K. Contract 83-1, Change Order #5, Water Treatment Plant (Control Valves) -- We have received a recommendation from our consulting engineer to expand a portion of the Water Treatment Plant contract to incorporate two changes as follows: • Part A: This provides for a change in the control console in the Water Treatment Plant to incorporate the Lexington Avenue booster station controls which would constructed during the fall of 1984 to be put on line during June of 1985. At the time of the design of the Water Treatment Plant, it was not anticipated that this Lexington Avenue booster station would be constructed at its present time schedule. Because of its schedule, it is appropriate to incorporate the telemetry equipment and control modules into the overall control console of the Water Treatment Plant.(ADD $14,080) Part B: This provides for incorporation of future pump control modules, digital displays and alarm controllers within the Water Treatment Plant control console. To incorpor- ate this work at this time will be substantially less expensive than future field installations as additional wells are added to the system every few years. (ADD $4,090) This proposed change order has been reviewed with the Public Works Director and the Utility Superintendent and found to be timely and cost effective to be included under this contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #5 • to Contract 83-1 in the amount of an additional $18,170 and author- ize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /A k WET LAND ,v.w. c>awea of i �NoarN L,rc or curuor 8 our�or a EASY SHORE Ii E—� \ 1 59.00 X56 MEti� a \ G�`1N E c \ \ UJA iB-Z c�JRVEY \� 29 0b / 3e.� 3 CD i \ 00 SSB 9,.m de of AC6rrEr YB L,NE 00..c °0 S N CO IN 0 LOT + L0y !u O OY'Co 3 6s 96 \ lm uQ Zoll .130 0TR 9S`� 6s 0 N ♦ n r ry roP coT o° a m P cP o ,? ) io D4 ss ^� �o 2 O. q� co oO,. N Rr�ERay �/ Q nJ O Z 9 �1ss y° F �B \ F U J D G E yNr a .�� "k-11 O°� S ree �. w�ro T \aboo rl� `�1/\f\r'I wwr�o oFJWvepry io2Oo oo••E c,"� / psi e7 k 4v J _ _ ti 3e oo 89 a, / oO� ho A�Ir. r I r LIi I I I.I�� 0 0 W� W 5 �e�oo 3z.0o r$ P� �—� oaA �nac a o / 6 Q ,� 0 n �1TILILY ESSLMCdi 6 0 a9 W O U (O !� l 38.00 •OO O s s N N J� W m M o M O I ^ •� /� ?p �/ Q CI N pj ? wcsrecLY zLo W e v d T f m M OurL T c— K Loy2 o % O i 38, LOT m .p )� o S 3 0 YI WEST LI�i4 �e`�o 00 E 3z.e0 �OT4 u k�~ .EI 00 fE 7^�-- it4?4 • �ra"l/° S 5 o�> lb 10 78* 0p ju1144C VA, ` i. Ile oOUTLOT A CN Gtr � -.. ♦ A. �. 'n. Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Ten • Is FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/CENTURY ADDITION L. Final Plat Application, Century Addition -- We have received an application for final plat approval for the Century Addition located in the northwest corner of Coachman Road and Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28). Enclosed on page /6 is a copy of the final plat for Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approved by Council action on October 18, 1983, have been complied with as well as the final plat con- figuration. In addition, all final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed and approved by staff and is being forwarded to the Council for favorable consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat application for the Century Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 1:!5 • I i _ p A :�� w ro a.ar «n ur rYI w lY _ i.r or In.. rr a.r. t.. 80 L _ M.r...lp. t..r .1 ww.•yrr101. rN rY 4.. -- 1 56�Y•51'00-E ip cc;i'n ...,Abbirlu rr _!:'% 1 u . ro-. 1, n.rn..r .Id ••••- u r -. ul 1� d rr .e..� .1 t.w........ ...n ..... `i -.r H _ .'tlU 7 ij wN alar 4r r! nu. •• _� wtw .r.. trlr MN urn ,_ I .r Mllir••e u r M W r min •surN a � In rl Xlldr 1 In_'n ]0 ba � 1T. eortn it. or CA,a.N. Na, Isle q u.we te mw a b\rl of 9outn 09 an... fl elms... 00 .r.M. [a.0. n a✓« NORTH o n.m.s t/! mcn by a inah floe NIN- MrIt 00tt 910urbW]-=Is-- I ..r Pltl. e.N YG -N0 N6!, u=Is---U • Wna 1 4ntl ,.n lrf llul i\li W.r�r..rr IIIN 1. M •Illu .1 �r ..mrr .• Ittt. • '<IN \., rr w 41r .••.NN le 4.n t`rot.. •rl{ t or aa9oi a.m..t•a to DELMAR H. SCHWANZ "' PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO REVISION .. •r' '"db�.'��11'I+�(•�>'4';. LAND SURVEYORS INC. 4 U LOCATION MAF' �.. .,... •e .+1 .N. r.nl \r w.I r. .I •,.•-•.n�,.......� ... rr.l p U. r.•nr .erim. r b. rr r rnYlo .uuN ul. r•r •1 — SEC 9- IVIP27. Rd 23 I run mu.a .r...r .vmanu n• in . 1 w I le dmY •...wl uI' I. i.IpNrr d gnld. 0. i1rMq r,tN rN do..n. - ' xl 1[M ' T l - I i.n i1 v. f 1 oYr . L rl•e,r xe X4l Orr � I - 1 L .Irr.. J• wf ..li [I:..Ire. wwY« lo.wwr... Ilhww 4r..1 ... M...,.. s lu iw.rl pnpr .elr � i.r a IM. it ilrYr i. il•m•.r. a 4w«I r•r, •. � ' it %i ri ii^rvaila.Yu rr rrl...wa _ M luaa4 Ina.ry o .enl.y. 1 41111 -E I'- li- -S69.OB- S99•51'00 tl / 1 r[ rlr,l 411w1 YN el rl,e•,Mlir, • e• w v_ _w.ao _ — — _ — ——P��: ep :Le.TG.. r _Iv — _ r / . Y�.r, •L s rl 81 2 8 r 8 3 .m • 8 § .[9•]e Cr,r rl:M Irntulw l..... , tr ar•rl. i elrMul,N r �T o n. e9.- se]•v'ao[ 9 n. x•f�n- Q \r' 0- q.. 8 _ – _ 8 l.aa / : 1 e..•p r rib nn 1 Y« ..-.rr .rNl.u...w nm•n wule.r \I. rlr� p p p Y1 / ' • 4-.wn n• Y wlr rl„ = w rra.r • e ,♦ alar• r Pellr e,.rrr• .- 2 _ _lel.: _ _193. _ _ 1, a re,l. Irl, mi ,Y I w ar«r•• • wne.„r.. 1�' IOa er wI•.r w. i. e.,u. n,.rr•,. rrr rn,.+ o. hj I q G . � l • I i _ p A :�� w ro a.ar «n ur rYI w lY _ i.r or In.. rr a.r. t.. 80 L _ M.r...lp. t..r .1 ww.•yrr101. rN rY 4.. -- 1 56�Y•51'00-E ip cc;i'n ...,Abbirlu rr _!:'% 1 u . ro-. 1, n.rn..r .Id ••••- u r -. ul 1� d rr .e..� .1 t.w........ ...n ..... `i -.r H _ .'tlU 7 ij wN alar 4r r! nu. •• _� wtw .r.. trlr MN urn ,_ I .r Mllir••e u r M W r min •surN a � In rl Xlldr 1 In_'n ]0 ba � 1T. eortn it. or CA,a.N. Na, Isle q u.we te mw a b\rl of 9outn 09 an... fl elms... 00 .r.M. [a.0. n a✓« NORTH o n.m.s t/! mcn by a inah floe NIN- MrIt 00tt 910urbW]-=Is-- I ..r Pltl. e.N YG -N0 N6!, u=Is---U • Wna 1 4ntl ,.n lrf llul i\li W.r�r..rr IIIN 1. M •Illu .1 �r ..mrr .• Ittt. • '<IN \., rr w 41r .••.NN le 4.n t`rot.. •rl{ t or aa9oi a.m..t•a to DELMAR H. SCHWANZ "' PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO REVISION .. •r' '"db�.'��11'I+�(•�>'4';. LAND SURVEYORS INC. 4 U • • Agenda Information June 5, 1984, City Page Eleven Memo Council Meeting FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/SUNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION M. Final Plat Application, Suncliff 2nd Addition -- We have received an application for final plat approval for the Suncliff 2nd Addition which is the second phase progression of this develop- ment. Enclosed on page /to is a copy of the final plat for Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval approved by Council on October 18, 1983, have been complied with in addition to this final plat conforming to the concept of the originally approved preliminary plat layout. In addition, all final plat application materials have been sub- mitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat of the Suncliff 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /7 1 i 1. BLACKMAWN 6r S vim[ 0rLOr q �N S ! Y%Oe'E A ira: •3 r�•Irrlc S ws!`+j�e6 A y�..-CUFF�7�..-_ ROA[ '�M!�µu•'mY!YY. "b mR 4u1.•uu i. q['ii/!!Gee }Lq}�b'��euC elx 6 vn 19ay -q1 lx- SUN CLIFF SECOND ADDITION r'"r I�Y'•�w'v'fis o+ ♦ p •� 3 n I e n e.Hvu'ig,F F q 1 wmw w. r.m erlme. a vNih Mry ! MI n .YP VN YP�e ;mnrl 6 e1 1•e. N IOIi ^n� N M [f•uLx •I Irl OM YI Ir4 1M x•4n Yb J �b M 1/• N ��4., r •een, .um sn•...• mNena Nnen n. Iun� n. emN. n r,•,rn a e.P W xer nbrc• Der• Mn yearn 4, vf•q' up•[ 9 L x IIN• ww" WP Nc. n. T 2 A 2 x�,•T O'� S.uL� e Y_ .a ..gin l:r• eMn / SUN CLIFF SECOND ADDITION r'"r I�Y'•�w'v'fis o+ ♦ p •� 3 n I e n CR. WINDEN B ASSOCIATES INC snKO $ VEYOese••-• is 0 0 F q 1 =� ..gin l:r• eMn / ah7 '��. I•-hnr F b � �:.' m nn•� mhe W 8� iWr �Z• Z ♦ �•me �x••� a -'"gin III ••/e a�ip �' e .}' '', � u.ma R_n�l S < III' ! 1 ■? �q •,r,nws ! N/bxP9 nam ,•. C�- 4 1 {{ S e£ CR. WINDEN B ASSOCIATES INC snKO $ VEYOese••-• is 0 0 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Twelve is E FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/HOLMES ADDITION N. Final Plat Application, Holmes Addition -- We received an application for final plat approval for the Holmes Addition located at .the northeast corner of Quarry Lane and Towerview Road. A copy of this final plat referencing these two residential lots is enclosed on page 2,0 for the Council's review. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval by Council action on April 3, 1984, have been complied with. In addition, all final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat application for the Holmes Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. // HOLMES ADDITION P11 NOONEEaONG CON PIIMY, INC. SNCEI 1 OE 1 SIIEEIS O. ,• ,I '• �1"" 1 �� LC MAYO LAKE ;n�/ _ BLOCC K I0-0 � 1 r y.. s P11 NOONEEaONG CON PIIMY, INC. SNCEI 1 OE 1 SIIEEIS • 171 • Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen GRADING PERMIT/LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH & LEXINGTON 2ND ADDITION O. Grading Permit Application, Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd Addition -- we received an application for a grading permit to perform the subdivision grading prior to final plat process for Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place South. The grading plan conforms to the preliminary plat approved by Council on April 17, 1984. All permit application requirements have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the grading permit application for Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd Addition. a/ Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen u FINAL PLAT/SAFARI ADDITION P. Final Plat Application, Safari Addition -- We have received an application for final plat approval for the Safari Addition located on the northwest corner of Safari Pass and Galaxie Avenue. Enclosed on page 2-3 is a copy of the final plat for the Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approved by Council action on March 22, 1984, have been complied with. In addition, all final plat application materials have been submitted and reviewed by staff and is being forwarded to the Council with a recommendation of favorable consideration. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat application for the Safari Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • • 0702 I F%giIRIT "A'• i THE SAFARI ADDITION I` .. i`. J !1 I Ct C = I i:•�Iis.mm-_ _ ___.^'• rO� •r^'m a •ae'ar r.�asnnm•.warn 509.50.22•Eaf31wG �•pl___ � •. n bb .90 •r �040 4s1 1 T�• .. -OUTLOT B ? It 1.T W poop •f`�nrA�t'1• Ot�1y _ fie lq ` a V rrpnp P lal•e m fll I�fl • In , a! • l 1 J• 1'' n +„a +• ��� 3 A • may. J `�_ � y1 � _ J. 'C7 N 'f. Q • ¢ ,e �,4 P.321 a6 •337 �' t1�: 5 _ o _ Mtgo 05 14 aSe �• y."2 '”; mai • i D• �1 p ,1 o,t. r � to . J. •• �' ",, // NORTH �o�'f ►"a'e OUTLOT A.;A, In 'potilt's i q; z •,• 3 0 i• •' ,a •. • n» ...I uM er aM nR er aM avvl 1. 6. b 2 $ `�•• = \ � •nu••a to Mo • eeerly er bran error• bf ' er 81. i� ) e bran• IR Ien er n fnen Inn olo• •w•.a •\ r1$ •.< •Itn oNLLlc uo orlpl "!II u•t1'. wlro \\•� rl I �Oanlr•1•e •no-+. •o t •` r• pre 7 19♦ Ira mn aml •4114 •u•nenu •n •nn.n an•nr LOCATION MAP �;U l7. 7W 77-A 273 r r r7 a DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS I INC. I r pp11 L Mlna + !r•a In •lean• u+lu• •a+•r•br IMle. •M ••eaJr•e.fNa Y lel• IIMr. "n" 1Y faa In aan M djolnla IIMM 11OIVaee M lM 01•l. ')R Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page fifteen J • PROJECT 411/FEASIBILITY REPORT Q. Project 411, Review Request/Authorize Feasibility Report - Patrick Eagan Park (Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) -- With the proposed development of the Birch Park Addition (formerly the Windcrest Addition) and the Pilot Pointe Addition (located between Skovdale No. 1 and 2) combined with the future storm sewer discharge from the multiple residential and commercial development of the Lexington South property at Lexington and County Road 30, the outlet for Patrick Eagan Park into Hurley Lake will become imminent within the next 1 - 2 years. Due to the fact that this outlet will have to cross Pat McCarthy's property to discharge into Hurley Lake, it is recommended that a feasibility report be prepared to discuss the proposed improvements at a public hearing to authorize the subsequent initiation of easement acquisi- tion through condemnation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 411 (Patrick Eagan Park - trunk storm sewer outlet). 1� Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen PROJECT 404/UTILITIES A. Project 404, Lexington Place South and 2nd Addition (Utilities) -- In response to a petition received by the developer (U.S. Homes/Orrin Thompson), the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of utilities to service the Lexington Place 2nd Addition and the Lexington Place South Addition located east of Lexington Avenue at Duckwood Drive. The feasibility report was presented to the Council on May 1 with the public hearing being scheduled for June 5. Enclosed on pages .24 through �— is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's review during the public hearing. A copy of this report has been provided to the developer for his review prior to the public hearing. As of this date, the staff has not received any comments or objections to this proposed project. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners who would be assessed with a portion of this project. L ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing • and approve/deny Project 404 for the installation of utilities to service Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place South. -'7J m 0 REPORT ON LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH ADDITION AND LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 0 PROJECT. NO. 404 Qe" EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE N0. 49306 /�oaedLroo, ilaseae, f4a�iilila a 4d"c&4eed, lac. • � P� Mr.�.�mato 2335 V 9...A #Vk .p 36 cS'!. P..4 Af"...y 55113 PA... 612.636-4600 May 1, 1984 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Lexington Place South S Lexington Place 2nd Addition Project 404 Our File No. 49306 Dear Mayor and Council: 0,0 G. Ronrsrroo. P.£. Reba w. Ronny. P.E. Jm hC. Ar Vhk. P.E. 81.Ww A. 4mDrr,, P.E. Rmn.rd E. Turns, P.E. damn C. M. , P.E. GHnn R. Cwt, P.E. KWh A.Gordon. P lLoroal E voyn. R.ha K Four, Rolm G. P.E. .Namur L. S k. AL D.m C. RurrsNr. P.E. /ar, A. Rourdm P. E. lfml A. Herron. P.E. TM K. F. d. P.E. ..q~ r. R.urmann, P.E. Robe R. PTr//me PE. 1+. Lr .PF. Cnerhr A. Elwk. L. Af. P...blr Ho &f M. OW, Transmitted herewith is our report for Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd Addition, Project 404. This report covers sanitary, sever, water main, and storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a • mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC. -;;7;(7,,,Z Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct super- vision and that I am aduly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. / Mark A. Hanson, P.E. Date: May 1„ 1984 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by,!. 'cal -LL) 41h, . Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Date:—�—� 7 • 0601c A7 • • • SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer to service Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd Addition. Lexington Place South is located south of Duckwood Drive and east of Lexington Avenue and includes 134 single family lots. Lexington Place 2nd Addition is located north of Duckwood Drive and east of the first phase for Lexington Place. Lexington Place 2nd Addition includes 6-16 unit, 1-12 unit, and 1-8 unit condominium building. Also included is the construction of a trunk water main along Lexington Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: SANITARY SEWER: Lexington Place South - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes an 8 inch di- ameter sanitary sewer constructed at a proper depth to service Lexington Place South. The sanitary sewer will connect to a proposed 8" sanitary sewer to be constructed as part of Lexington Square. The sanitary sewer will extend north from Wescott Road as shown on the attached drawing. An easement will be re- quired for construction of the sanitary sewer north from Wescott Road to the south line of Lexington Place South. It is anticipated this easement will be acquired by U.S. Home Corporation developers for Lexington Place South. Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes an 8 inch diameter sanitary sewer constructed in Blue Jay Way as shown on the at- tached drawing. The sanitary sewer will connect to an existing manhole con- structed as part of the first phase. The two 16 unit buildings located north of Blue Jay Way will be served by the existing sanitary sewer constructed as part of first phase for Lexington Place. The 16 unit building located north 0601c Page 1. Z� of Duckwood Drive midway between Blue Jay Way will be served by an extension of the proposed sanitary sewer from Lexington Place South. WATER MAIN: Lexington Place South - Water main proposed within Lexington Place South in- cludes a 6 inch diameter water main as shown on the attached drawing. Also included is the construction of an 18 inch diameter trunk water main along the west side of Lexington Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road. The trunk water main will connect to an existing 18 inch water main at both Wescott Road and Duckwood drive. The 6 inch water main in Lexington Place South will con- nect to the 16 inch trunk water main in Duckwood Drive at three locations and to the 18 inch trunk water main in Lexington Avenue at one location. Also in- cluded is the required number of valves and hydrants. Lexington Place South is located in the intermediate pressure zone with static pressures of 60 psi. Ll Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Water main proposed within Lexington Place 2nd Addition includes extending the 16 inch diameter trunk water main in Duckwood • Drive to it's east line. Also included is extending a 6 inch diameter water main south from Duckwood Drive along the easterly portion of Blue Jay Way which will connect to the existing 6 inch water main in the northerly portion of Blue Jay Way. The 6 inch diameter water main will be looped to service the 2-16 unit buildings located north of Blue Jay Way. Also included is the re- quired number of valves and hydrants. Lexington Place 2nd Addition is located in the intermediate pressure zone with static pressures of 60 psi. SERVICES: Lexington Place South - Internal lots within Lexington Place South will be served by 4 inch diameter sanitary sewer and 1 inch diameter water. It is proposed to construct the service line 15 feet beyond the property line. It is also proposed to construct water services from the 18" trunk main in Lex- • Page 2. 0601c z9 • ington Avenue to the existing homes. For purposes of this report it is as- sumed these services will be 1-1/2" diameter to provide the proper pressure. Lexington place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed from the main line to within 15 feet of the building unit. Sanitary sewer service are proposed to be 6 inch diameter and water service are proposed to be 4 inch diameter. STORM SEWER: Lexington Place South - Storm sewer- proposed herein will convey storm water runoff from Lexington Place South to an existing 24" CMP culvert beneath Lex- ington Avenue as shown on the attached drawing. From this point storm water will be conveyed .naturally through an open channel to Hurly Lake (Pond JP -11). The outlet for this pond is presently being constructed as part of • Project No. 382. Storm water within Lexington Place South will be contained within three storm water ponds which are discussed as follows: Storage NWL HWL Ac -Ft. Outflow Pond JP -45A 899.7 900.7 1.74 0.5 cfs Pond JP -45 894.0 897.3 3.14 1.0 cfs Pond JP -45B 893 895.5 3.19 1.0 cfs As indicated in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan, Pond JP -46 located di- rectly east of Lexington Place South in Carriage Hills Golf course was in- tended to outlet to Pond JP -45. Reviewing in detail the present characteris- tics of Pond JP -46, it is recommended it's outlet -be directed to the southeast to Pond JP -42 thus confining the drainage within Carriage Hills Golf Course to • it's own boundaries along with Lexington Place South. Storm sewer pipe pro - Page 3. 0601c ,30 posed herein include a combination of 24", 18", 15" and 12" diameter storm • sewer pipe. Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Storm sewer proposed within Lexington Place 2nd Addition includes extending an 18" diameter storm sewer pipe southerly in Blue Jay Way as shown on the attached drawing. Also included is construction of a manhole in conjunction with two catch basins and 15" storm sewer pipe within the cul-de-sac located northerly of Blue Jay Way. The manhole will be con- structed over the, existing 12" storm sewer constructed as part of the first phase. It should also be noted that with the increase in development for this drainage area, Pond DP -10 is presently experiencing a flooding condition and that it's outlet to Pond DP -5 and then to Pond DP -4 should be considered shortly. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA • NW 1/4, SECTION 14 Lexington Place First Addition, Lot 1, Block 3 (Future Lexington Place 2nd Addition) SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Williams and Larue Addition Block 1; Lots 1-4 Parcel 011-52 (Future Lexington Place South) Parcel 030-53 Parcel 041-53 Parcel 043-53 Parcel 044-53 SE 1/4, SECTION 15 St. Francis Wood Addition - Outlot A • Parcel 012-76 0601c Page 4. 3/ COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located • at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH Sanitary Sewer $ 295,020 Water Main Lexington Avenue Trunk Water Main 177,330 Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main 149,010 Services Lexington Avenue Services 11,290 Lexington Place South Services 107,180 Storm Sewer 168,940 Page 5. 0601c 3-7-1 LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION Sanitary Sewer S 25,820 • Water Main 81,190 Services 36,410 Storm Sewer 22,280 TOTAL ............................ $1,074,470 The total estimated project cost is $1,074,470 which includes contingen- cies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 27% and in- clude legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to belevied against the benefited prop- erty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. SANITARY SEWER: Lexington Place South - Sanitary sewer proposed herein is lateral and is therefore proposed to be assessed entirely to the benefited property. The • sanitary sewer from Wescott Road north to the south line Lexington Place South Page 5. 0601c 3-7-1 is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis at the lateral benefit from trunk rate in effect at the time.of the public hearing. A corner lot credit • of 150' in conjunction with assuming only the developable front footage would be assessed was the basis for determining the assessable footage. All remain- ing costs were divided equally amongst the benefited lots in Lexington Place South including 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. Trunk area assessments for this area are pending as part of Project No. 361 Wescott Trunk Sanitary Sewer. Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer proposed herein is to be as- sessed equally amongst the benefited units in Lexington Place 2nd Addition. Trunk area sanitary sewer for this area was previously assessed as part of Project No. 58. WATER MAIN: Lexington Place South - Trunk water main within Lexington Avenue is proposed to be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate in effect at the time of • the public hearing based on the present zoning use. It is proposed to.assess only 50% of the front footage along Lexington Avenue to those parcels which will receive benefit for looping purposes. However, it is proposed that the trunk water main in Duckvood Drive be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate based on the entire front footage 'abutting Lexington Place South. It is also proposed to assess those areas which have not been previously as- sessed for trunk area water main if they receive direct benefit. Lateral water main within Lexington Place South will be assessed completely to the benefited lots in addition to assuming 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Trunk water main within Duckvood Drive is pro- posed to be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate in effect at the time of the public hearing for the entire front footage abutting Lexington • 0601c Page 6. 35 • Place 2nd Addition. Lateral water main within Lexington Place 2nd Addition will be assessed equally amongst the benefited units. Trunk area water main for this area was previously assessed as part of Project No. 58. SERVICES: Lexington Place South - Services proposed within Lexington Place South will be assessed equally amongst the benefited lots including 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. It is proposed that the cost for the water main services along Lexington Avenue be assessed equally to the benefited lots. Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Services proposed within Lexington Place 2nd Addition will be assessed equally amongst the benefited units. STORM SEWER: Lexington Place. South - Storm sever within Lexington Place South is considered lateral storm sewer and is therefore proposed to be assessed equally amongst • the benefited lots including 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. Because the storm sever witnin Lexington Place South conveys drainage only within it's boundaries and is not designed to extend beyond it's boundaries, no areas out- side of Lexington Place South excepting the 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53 are proposed to be assessed for lateral storm sever. Trunk area storm sever is proposed to be assessed to the area shown on the attached drawing based on the rates in effect at the time of the public hearing. TRUNK RATES: Trunk area and lateral benefit from trunk rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: TRUNK AREA Trunk Water Main Oversize Agricultural Residential Platted Lot • Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize Single Family 0601c Page 7. $1,120/Acre $535/lot $0.045/a.f. LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sever $13.10/F.F. Lateral Benefit Water Main Single Family $10.84/F.F. Multiple $17.87/F.F. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Sanitary Sewer Lateral Lateral Benefit Lateral Assessment Water. Main Trunk Lateral Trunk Area Lateral Benefit from Trunk Lateral Assessment Services Lateral Lateral Assessment 0601c LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH Project Cost Revenue Balance $295,020 $ 6,550 288,470 $295,020 $295,020 - 0 - $177,330 149,010 $ 52,204 46,785 149,010 $326,340 $247,999 -$ 78,341 $119,100 $119,100 $119,100 $119,100 - 0 - Page 8. 3$ 0 • • Storm Sever • Lateral $168,940 Lateral Assessment $168,940 Trunk Area Assessment 87,667 $168,940 $256,607 +$ 87,667 TOTAL............................................... +S 9,326 LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION Project Cost Revenue Balance Sanitary Sever Lateral $ 25,820 Lateral Assessment $ 25,820 $ 25,820 $ 25,820 - 0 - Water Main • Trunk $ 34,740 Lateral 46,450 Lateral Benefit from Trunk $ 13,796 Lateral Assessment 46,450 $ 81,190 $ 60,246 -$ 20,944 Services Lateral $ 36,410 Lateral Assessment $ 36,410 $ 36,410 $ 36,410 - 0 - Storm Sever Lateral $ 22,280 Lateral Assessment $ 22,280 $ 22,280 $ 22,280 - 0 - • TOTAL ............................................... -$ 20,944 Page 9. 0601c 36 The total estimated trunk fund balance for Lexington Place South and Lex- ington Place 2nd Addition is -$11,618 (-$20,944 + $9,326 = -$11,618). Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plane and Specifications Open Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Taxes 0601c PROJECT SCHEDULE Page 10. 37 0 May 1, 1984 June 5,1984 June 5, 1984 June 29, 1984 July 3, 1984 Fall, 1984 Spring, 1985 Spring, 1986 0 11 • APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH PROJECT NO. 404 A. SANITARY SEWER 6,710 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 0'-20' dp. in pl. @ $15.00/l.f. $100,650 750 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 20'-40' dp. in pl. @ $50.00/l.f. 37,500 38 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 34,200 230 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/each 16,100 10 Lin.ft. 8" Outside drop @ $120.00/lin.ft. 1,200 300 Lin.ft. 4" CISP Service riser in pl. @ $18.00/lin.ft. 5,400 141 Each 8" x 4" wye in pl. @ $50.00/each 7,050 1 Each Connect MH to existing 8" PVC @ $200.00/each 200 300 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 3,000 LUMP SUM Clear b grub tree @ $1,000.00/L.S. 1,000 7,460 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 11,190 • 2.5 Acre Seed w/fertilizer b mulch @ 51,500.00/acre 3,750 Total $221,240 +5% Contingencies 11,060 $232,300 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 62,720 TOTAL................................................. $295,020 - J 0601c Page 11. B. WATER MAIN a) Lexington Avenue Trunk Water Main (Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road) 2,680 Lin.ft. 18" DIP Water main in pl. @ $37.00/lin.ft. 60 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $15.00/lin.ft. 60 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 6" DIP v/carrier pipe @ $100.00/lin.ft. 2 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,200.00/each 1 Each 18" Butterfly valve and box @ $2,400.00/each 3 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve 6 box @ $450.00/each 7,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 2 Each Connect 18" DIP to existing 18" DIP @ $500.00/each 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2.0 Acres Seed with fertilizer 6 mulch @ $1,500.00/acre 320 Ton Class 2 shouldering material @ $8.00/ton 2,740 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. Total +5Z Contingencies +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest TOTAL................................................ b) Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main 6,370 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 12 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 11 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $450.00/each 6,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 6,370 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/Lb. Total +5% Contingencies 0601c +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest TOTAL............................................... Page 12. 34 40 $ 99,160 900 6,000 2,400 2,400 1,350 9,100 1,000 1,000 3,000 2,560 4,110 $132,980 6,650 $139,630 37,700 • $177,330 . $ 76,440 12,000 4,950 7,800 1,000 9.555 $111,745 5,585 $117,330 31,680 $149,010 • • C. SERVICES a) Lexington Avenue Services 320 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 114" Type "K" copper in pl. @ $24.00/l.f. $ 7,680 6 Each 114" Corporation atop in pl. @ $50.00/each 300 6 Each 114" Curb stop 6 box in pl. @ $80.00/each 480 Total $ 8,460 +5Z Contingencies 430 $ 8,890 +27Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 2,400 TOTAL............................................... $ 11,290 b) Lexington Place South Services 5,640 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $5.00/lin.ft. $ 28,200 5,640 Lin.ft. 1" Type "K" copper in pl. @ $5.00/lin.ft. 28,200 141 Each 1" Corporation atop in pl. @ $30.00/each 4,230 141 Each 1" Curb stop 6 box in pl. @ $80.00/each 11,280 5,640 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 8,460 Total $ 80,370 • +5Z Contingencies 4,020 $ 84,390 +27Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bund Interest 22,790 L 0601c TOTAL ................................................ $107,180 Page 13. Z D. STORM SEWER 240 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $34.00/lir,.ft. 860 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 640 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 1,850 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 8 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 6 Each Std. 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 8 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 1 Each 24" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $1,200.00/each 3 -Each 18" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $900.00/each 1 Each 15" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 4 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash`guard @ S700.00/each LUMP SUM Clear 6 grub trees @ $1,000.00/L.S. 30 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. I 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pii pe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 3,590 Lin.ft. .Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 2.0 Acres Seed w/fertilizer b mulch @ $1,500.00/acre Total +5X Contingencies +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin'-& Bond Interest TOTAL ................... .......................... LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH SUPDIARY A. SANITARY SEWER B. WATER MAIN a) Lexington Avenue TrunklWater Main b) Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main C. SERVICE a) Lexington Avenue Services I b) Lexington Place South Services D. STORM SEWER TOTAL LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH ............ i Page 14. 0601c I 5 8,160 • 24,080, 15,360 40,700 7,200 5,400 6,400 1,200 2,700 800 2,800 1,000 1,500 1,000 5,385 3,000 $126,685 6,335 • $133,020 35,920 $168,940 $295,020 177,330 149.010 11,290 107,180 168,940 $908,770 • • LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION PROJECT NO. 404 A. SANITARY SEWER 730 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sever in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft. $ 10,220 6 Each Std. 4' dia. MH v/cstg. @ $900.00/each Lin.ft. 5,400 12 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/lin.ft. Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 840 8 Each 8"x6" wye in pl. @ $50.00/each 2,000 400 1 Each Connect 8" PVC to ex. MH @ $400.00/each 6,000 400 100 Cu.yd. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. Each 1,000 730 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $300.00/each 1,095 100 Cu.yd. Total $ 19,355 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. +52 Contingencies 975 Total $ 60,875 $ 20,330 3,055 +272 Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 5,490 TOTAL............................................... $ 25,820 B. WATER MAIN • 780 Lin.ft. 16" DIP Water main in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 21,840 1,590 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 19,080 4 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 4,000 1 Each 16" Butterfly valve b box @ $2,000.00/each 2,000 2 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $450.00/each 900 6,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 7,800 1 Each Connect 16" DIP to existing 16" DIP @ $400.00/each 400 1 Each Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $300.00/each 300 100 Cu.yd. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 2,370 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 3,555 Total $ 60,875 +52 Contingencies 3,055 $ 63,930 +272 Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 17,260 • TOTAL ................................................ $ 81,190 Page 15. 0601c C. SERVICES 1,360 Lin.ft 7 Each 1,360 Lin.ft 8 Each 1,360 Lin.ft D. STORM SEWER 250 Lin.ft. 70 Lin.ft. ._ 4 Each 4 Each 1 Each 50 Cu.yds. 280 Lin.ft. 0601c 0 6" PVC Sanitary sever service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 8,160 6" PVC Clean-out @ $100.00/each 700 4" DIP Water main service @ $10.00/lin.ft. 13,600 4" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $350.00/each 2,800 Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 2,040 Total $ 27,300 +5X Contingencies 1,370 $ 28,670 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 7,740 TOTAL................................................. $ 36,410 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 7,000 15" RCP Storm sever in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 1,680 Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 3,600 Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 3,200 Connect 18" RCP to existing 18" RCP @ $300.00/each 300 • Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 500 Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 420 Total $ 16,700 +5% Contingencies 840 $ 17,540 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 4,740 TOTAL................................................ $ 22,280 LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION SUMMARY A. SANITARY SEWER $ 25,820 B. WATER MAIN 81,190 C. SERVICE 36,410 D. STORM SEWER 22,280 TOTAL LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDN. ...... $165,700 Page 16. a • • APPENDIX,B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL . LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH PROJECT NO. 404 A. SANITARY SEWER a) Lateral Benefit from Sever Assessable Total Parcel Description Front Footage Rate/FF Assessment Parcel 030-53 250 $13.10 $3,275 Parcel 041-53 250 $13.10 3,275 $6,550 Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place South • Block 1, Lots 1-8 8 $2,045 $ 16,367 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $2,045 59,331 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $2,045 18,412 Block 4, Lots 1-10 10 $2,045 20,458 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $2,045 20,458 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 16,367 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 20,458 Outlot F (13 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 26,597 Outlot G (18 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 36,826 Outlot H (11 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 22,508 Outlot I (8 Lot Equivalent) $2,045 16,367 SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 044-53 (7 Lot Equivalent $2,045 14,321 TOTAL ............. 141 $288,470 • Page 17. 0601c B. WATER MAIN a) Lateral Parcel Description Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 Block 2, Lots 1-29 Block 3, Lots 1-9 Block 4, Lots 1-10 Block 5, Lots 1-10 Outlot D Outlot E Outlot F Outlot G Outlot H Outlot I SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 044-53 TOTAL ............. b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk • (7 Lot Equivalent) $1,057, 7,398 • 141 $149,010 Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Lexington Place South (1384.23 F.F. x $10.84/FF - $15,005) Block 1, Lots 1-8 Total No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment 8 2, Lots $1,057 $ 8,454 29 $112 $1,057 30,647 9 1-9 9 $1,057 9,511 10 Block 4, $1,057 10,568 10 $1,057 10,568 (8 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 8,454 (10 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 10,568 (13 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 13,739 (18 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 19,023 (11 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 11,625 ( 8 Lot Equivalent) $1,057 8,454 (7 Lot Equivalent) $1,057, 7,398 • 141 $149,010 Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Lexington Place South (1384.23 F.F. x $10.84/FF - $15,005) Block 1, Lots 1-8 8 $112 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $112 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $112 Block 4, Lots 1-10 10 $112 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $112 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $112 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $112 Outlot F (13 Lot Equivalent) $112 Outlot G (18 Lot Equivalent) $112 Outlot H (11 Lot Equivalent) $112 Outlot I ( 8 Lot Equivalent) $112. 134 Page 18. 0601c Total Assessment $ 896 3,247 1,008 1,120 1,120 896 1,120 1,456 2,016 1,232 896 • $ 15,005 • b) Lateral'Benefit from Trunk (Cont'd. Lot 1 -- -- 1 lot Assessable $ Total Parcel Description Front Footage Rate/FF Assessment William and Larue Addition $535/Lot $ 535 Block 1, Lot 1 179 $10.84(2) $ 1,940.36 Block 1, Lot 2 135 $10.84 1,463.40 Block 1, Lot 3 156 $10.84 1,691.04 Block 1, Lot 4 140 $10.84 1,517.60 St. Francis Wood - Outlot A 641.42(1) $17.87(3) 11,462.18 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 043-53 417.36 $10.84 $ 4,524.18 Parcel 044-53 242.64 $10.84 2,630.22 SE 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 012-76 604.36(1) $10.84 6.551.26 11 11 (1) Represents 502 of total front footage abutting Lexington Avenue. (2) Single Family Rate (3) Multiple Rate c. Trunk Area Area Credit Parcel Description (acre) (acre) Lexington Place South 50 Street -9.4 (Parcel 011-52) Pond -3.9 William 6 Larue Addition $31,780.24 Assessable Area Total (acre) Rate Assessment 36.7 $1,120/Ac. $41,104 Block 1, Lot 1 -- -- 1 lot $535/lot $ 535 Block 1, Lot 2 -- -- 1 lot $535/Lot $ 535 Block 1, Lot 3 -- -- 1 lot $535/lot $ 535 Block 1, Lot 4 -- -- 1 lot $535/lot $ 535 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 043-53 3.18 Street -0.64 2.54 $1,120/ac. $ 2,845 Parcel 044-53 6.82 Street -1.36 5.46 $1,120/ac. 6,115 TOTAL ......................... $52,204 0601c Page 19. c. Trunk Area (Cont'd.) Total • Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 8 $301 $ 2,454 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $307 8,896 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $307 2,761 Block 4, Lots 1-10 10 $307 3,067 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $307 3,067 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $307 2,454 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $307 3,067 Outlot F (13 Lot Equivalent) $307 3,988 Outlot G (18 Lot Equivalent) $307 5,522 Outlot H (11 Lot Equivalent) $307 3,374 Outlot I ( 8 Lot Equivalent) $307 2,454 134 $ 41,104 C. SERVICES a) Lexington Avenue Services Total Parcel Description No. of Services Cost/Service Assessment • William and Larue Addition Block 1, Lot 1 1 $1,882 $ 1,882 Block 1, Lot 2 1 $1,882 1,882 Block 1, Lot 3 1 $1,882 1,882 Block 1, Lot 4 1 $1,882 1,882 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 043-53 1 $1,882 $ 1,882 Parcel 044-53 1 $1,882 1,882 TOTAL ...................... $11,290 0601c Page 20. j47 • • b) Lexington Place South Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 8 $760 $ 6,081 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $760 22,044 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $760 6,841 Black 4, Lots 1-10 10 $760 7,601 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $760 7,601 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $760 6,081 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $760 7,601 Outlot F (13 Lot Equivalent) $760 9,882 Outlot C (18 Lot Equivalent) $760 13,683 Outlot H (11 Lot Equivalent) $760 8,362 Outlot I ( 8 Lot Equivalent) $760 6,082 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 044-53 (7 Lot Equivalent $760 $ 5,321 TOTAL ........... 141 $107,180 • D. STORM SEWER a) Lateral Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 a $1,198 $ 9,585 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $1,198 34,747 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $1,198 10,783 Block 4, Lots 1-10 10 $1,198 11,982 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $1,198 11,982 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 9,585 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 11,982 Outlot F (13 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 15,576 Outlot C (18 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 21,567 Outlot H (11 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 13,180 Outlot I ( 8 Lot Equivalent) $1,198 9,585 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 • Parcel 044-53 (7 lot equivalents) $1,198 $ 8,387 TOTAL .......... 141 $168,940 Page 21. 0601c b) Trunk Area 0601c Page 22. a 11 Assessable Area Credit Area Total Parcel Description (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) Rate Assessment Lexington Place South 2,178,000 Str. 410,770 1,599,530 $0.045/s.f. $71,979 Pond 167,700 SW 1/4, SECTION 14 Parcel 043-53 138,690 Str. 27,740 110,950 $0.045 $ 4,993 Parcel 044-53 297,080 Str. 59,420 237,660 $0.045 10,695 TOTAL ........................................ $87,667 Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 8 $537 $ 4,298 Block 2, Lots 1-29 29 $537 15,578 Block 3, Lots 1-9 9 $537 4,834 Block 4, Lots 1-10 10 $537 5,371 Block 5, Lots 1-10 10 $537 5,371 Outlot D (8 Lot Equivalent) $537 4,297 Outlot E (10 Lot Equivalent) $537 5,372 Outlot F_ (13 Lot Equivalent) $537 6,983 Outlot C (18 Lot Equivalent) $537 9,669 Outlot H- (11 Lot Equivalent) $537 5,909 Outlot I (8 Lot Equivalent) $537 4,297 134 $ 71,979 0601c Page 22. a 11 is 0601c Page 23. 50 LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION. PROJECT NO: 404 A. SANITARY SEWER Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place 2nd Addition Block 1, Lot 1 16 $223 $ 3,561 Block 1, Lot 2 12 $223 2,671 Block 1, Lot 3 16 $223 3,561 Block 2, Lot 1 16 $223 3,562 Block 2, Lot 2 16 $223 3,562 Block 2, Lot 3 8 $223 1,781 Block 2, Lot 4 16 $223 3,561 Block 2, Lot 5 16 $223 3,561 TOTAL .......... 116 $25,820 • B. WATER MAIN a) Lateral Total Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment Lexington Place 2nd Addition Block 1, Lot 1 16 $400 $ 6,407 Block 1, Lot 2 12 $400 4,805 Block 1, Lot 3 16 $400 6,407 Block 2, Lot 1 16 $400 6,407 Block 2, Lot 2 16 $400 6,407 Block 2, Lot 3 8 $400 3,203 Block 2, Lot 4 16 $400 6,407 Block 2, Lot 5 16 $400 6,407 TOTAL .............. 116 $46,450 is 0601c Page 23. 50 n (1� Multiple Rate C. SERVICE b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Total • Parcel Description Total Parcel Description No. of Units Cost/Unit Assessment Lexington Place 2nd Addition (772 F.F. x $17.87/F.F. (1) _ $13,796) 1, Lot Block 1, Lot 1 16 $119 $ 1,903 Block 1, Lot 2 12 $119 1,427 Block 1, Lot 3 16 $119 1,903 Block 2, Lot 1 16 $119 1,903 Block 2, Lot 2 16 $119 1,903 Block 2, Lot 3 8 $119 951 Block 2, Lot 4 16 $119 1,903 Block 2, Lot 5 16 $119 1,903 Block TOTAL .............. 116 16 $13,796 (1� Multiple Rate C. SERVICE Total • Parcel Description No. of Units Cost/Unit Assessment Lexington Place 2nd Addition Block 1, Lot 1 16 $314 $ 5,022 Block 1, Lot 2 12 $314 3,767 Block 1, Lot 3 16 $314 5,022 Block 2, Lot 1 16 $314 5,022 Block 2, Lot 2 16 $314 5,022 Block 2, Lot 3 8 $314 2,511 Block 2, Lot 4 16 $314 5,022 Block 2, Lot 5 16 $314 5,022 TOTAL .............. 116 $36,410 0601c Page 24. .5 1 • • D. STORM SEWER • • 0601c Page 25. S.L Total Parcel Description No. of Units Cost/Unit Assessment Lexington Place 2nd Addition Block 1, Lot 1 16 $192 $ 3,073 Block 1, Lot 2 12 $192 2,305 Block 1, Lot 3 16 $192 3,073 Block 2, Lot 1 16 $192 3,073 Block 2, Lot 2 16 $192 3,073 Block 2, Lot 3 8 $192 1,537 Block 2, Lot 4 16 $192 3,073 Block 2, Lot 5 16 $192 3,073 TOTAL .............. 116 $22,280 • • 0601c Page 25. S.L SUMMARY PROJECT NO. 404 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL COST/LOT, UNIT, PARCEL Water Main Storm Sewer Sanitary Lateral Trunk Services Sewer Benefit Total Parcel Description Lateral Lateral From Trunk Area Lateral Lateral Trunk Assessment Lexington Place South Block 1, Lots 1-8 $ 2,045 $1,057 $ 112 $ 307 $ 760 $1,198 $ 537 $ 6,016.00 Block 2, Lots 1-29 $ 2,045 1,057 $ 112 307 760 1,198 '537 6,016.00 Block 3, Lots 1-9 $ 2,045 1,057 $ 112 307 760 1,198 537 6,016.00 Block 4, Lots 1-10 $ 2,045 1,057 $ 112 307 760 1,198 537 6,016.00 Block 5, Lots 1-10 $ 2,045 1,057 $ 112 307 760 1,198 537 6,016.00 Outlot D $16,367 8,454 $ 896 2,454 6,081 9,585 4,297 48,134.00 Outlot E $20,458 10,568 $1,120 3,067 7,601 11,982 5,372 60,168.00 Outlot F $26,597 13,739 $1,456 3,988 9,882 15,576 6,983 78,221.00 Outlot C $36,826 19,023 $2,016 5,521 13,683 21,567 9,669 108,305.00 Outlot H $22,508 11,625 $1,232 3,374 8,362 13,180 5,909 66,190.00 Outlot I $16,367 8,454 $ 896 2,454 6,082 9,585 4,297 48,135.00 Lexington Place 2nd Addition Block 1, Lot 1 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 1, Lot 2 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 1, Lot 3 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ .192 -- $ 1,248 Block 2, Lot 1 _$ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 2, Lot 2 $ 223 $ 400 $' 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 2, Lot 3 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 2, Lot 4 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 Block 2, Lot 5 $ 223 $ 400 $ 119 -- $ 314 $ 192 -- $ 1,248 sic 41ge • 26. 0 (Continued) William and Larue Addition Block 1, Lot 1 -- Block 1, Lot 2 -- Block 1,,Lot 3 -- Block 1, Lot 4 -- St. Francis Wood OUTLOT A -- SW 1/4, SECTION 14 SUMMARY PROJECT NO. 404 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL COST/LOT, UNIT, PARCEL -- $1,940.36 $ 535 $1,882 -- -- $ 4,357.36 -- $1,463.40 $ 535 $1,882 -- -- $ 3,880.40 -- $1,691.04 $ 535 $1,882 -- -- $ 7,988.44 -- $1,517.60 $ 535 $1,882 -- -- $ 3,934.60 $11,462.18 -- -- -- -- $11,462.18 Parcel 030-53 $ 3,275 $:3,275.00 Parcel 041-53 $ 3,275 $ 3,275.00 Parcel 043-53 $ 4,524.18 $2,845 $1,882 $ 4,993 $14,244.18 Parcel 044-53 $14,321 $7,398 $ 2,630.22 $6,115 $7,203 $8,387 $10,695$56,749.22 SE 1/4, SECTION 15 Parcel 012-76 0601c $ 6,551.26 -- Page 27. -- -- -- $ 6,551.26 W � � O O O Q O t— Y1 2! 4 5 4 7 9 910` I O U 0• \ Ua TL1P Olf'rL,„C � % N O50 -Ss W O I 3 2 1 3 z 1 \ \ S 29 2 7O \ WTLOT A 5 28 3 I S 9 7 27 3 !/ O;L LdT 1 I I I I 1 1 I IG' I 041-53 2e , O 70 25 9 z4 7 B 9 10 z3 9 1 II 22 9 ' _L_L _L_L_l-i_, 19 IS 12 0 10 B.T —= 7 LOT EOUIV4 LENT 030-55 PROPOSED 20 19 _ — 044- 33 LEXINGTON SQUARE' Is 19 n 18 I 2 OVTLOT C 1-0. 'O WILLIAMS LARUE ADD. 3 F �— O — 043.53 1 1 2 3 4 9 9 1 6 5 LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO. 43 ) ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD. 012.79 LATERAL BENEFIT FROM SEWER RATE/F. F. if CORNER LOT CREDIT 150 FT LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER -qrll� F NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK d ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date: MAY, 1984 PRO♦J. NO. COMM. 49306 404 NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers EAGAN, MINNESOTA St. Paul, Minn. WATER MAIN Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO. _[COMM. 49306 404 .-<4 W p O O O O cr Y I 3 4 3 6 7 6 a O O v 7 h�T Ei �O L � 0fflZ oso•ss N O dT/ 1 s z 1 1 i % ; \\ 3 ' 29 E i OUTLOT 4 5 26 y/}u7T 5 6 27 4 T, 0� 7 6 Ool-SS 25 i 6 I G I I 6 25 6 �O r a 24 r 6 . 10 25 6 II Y I I 1413 12 21 10= 7LOT EQUIVALENT 030-53 ' I 20 044-33 _ IS IB 17 IB IY I OUTLOT C ~ J F WILLIAMS 6 LARUE DO. I 3 3 O .013-53 1 2 3 4 • i s e7e s ® 0 6.r 1B" -- mlivLawlamm I LEXINGTON AVE. (C0. R0. NO.43 ) ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD. 012 •76 LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT RESIDENTIAL RATE ®®® COMMERCIAL HIGH DENSITY RATE NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers EAGAN, MINNESOTA St. Paul, Minn. WATER MAIN Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO. _[COMM. 49306 404 .-<4 W LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO. 43 ) ST. FRANCIS W000 ADD. TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATER MAIN TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT !; 7 012-76 NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET 0 SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers • St. Paul, Minn. Date: MAY. 19841r PROJ. NO. COMM. 49306 1 404 n L "Im oQ Dan.If�� 3 • 1 4 J 9 e T e a 9 101 1a�o POND JP -050. OOTTLOT A i L 90 i d 1 7LOT EOUIVAL ENT = 044-53 O 0_ —2- 0 043.53 4 5 O, T L S a 1f \110/ 7 I OUTLOT C 1r LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO.43 ) ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD. NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGANF MINNESOTA STORM SEWER 0 0 050-53 vvi W 3 041-53 030-53 ILLI MS a LARUE DO 1 x 1 s 4 012-76 I\ . ERISTINO OPEN BWALE POND JP -11 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK d ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: MAY, 19Ra pROJ. NO. Comm. a9ao5 404 O` O Q OI O Y u r� I Ll LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD. ® AREA ASSESSMENT ,*40.43) LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER AREA ASSESSMENT rr9 012 -7e NORTH 0 400 SCALE IN FEET Pi 11 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLM III, ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting E"Ineers • St. Paul. Minn. Oats: MAY. 1984 PROJ. NO. COMM. 49306 1 404 0 • ASSESSMENT AREA NORTH o. zqo SCALE IN IN FEET LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION • UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER 66 BLUE JAY WAY LEXINGTON AVEACO.RO.NO. w E 0 0 0 0 3 Y U 7 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Data: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO. Comm, 49306 Ir 404 J LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION BLUE JAY WAY ASSESSMENT AREA LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT ® COMMERCIAL HIGH DENSITY RATE NORTH LEXINGTON AVE. (C0. RD. NO.43 ) 0 200 1 SCALE IN FEET LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA WATER MAIN 41 • BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. • Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO. Comm. 49305 dnd `v � 'i tlNlts ::t IS ttW�f? � S i In t�uNKs .t n� ASSESSMENT AREA NORTH 0 !00 SCALE IN FEET I LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION BLUE JAY WAY LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO.43 ) LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER G L I C 9 SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK i ASSOCIATES, INC. ComWting EngMeere St. Paul. Minn. Data: MAY. 198 PROD. NO. Comm. 49306 1i 404 i Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Seventeen • • PROJECT 400/LIFT STATION/FORCE MAIN OUTLET B. Project 400, Oak Cliff Pond (Lift Station and Force Main Outlet -- In response to a petition received from the developer of the Oak Cliff Addition, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report to install the lift station and force main outlet for the pond located in the center of this subdivision. On May 1, the completed feasiblity report was presented to the Council for their review and scheduling of the public hearing to be held on June 5. Enclosed on pages _ (�_ through i/ is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's review during this public hearing. A copy of the feasibility report has been sent to the developer for his review. In addition, notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections or comments pertaining to this proposed project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 400 for the installation of a storm sewer lift station and force main outlet to the Oak Cliff pond. G3 0 0 REPORT ON OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10) TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET PROJECT NO. 400 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE N0. 49303 /�o.redt:oa, Rodme, 4m&*" a 44j"ia", Inc. 61, i 36 SL. P..c M....r. 33113 P".- 612-636-4600 May 3, 1984 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Oak Cliff Pond (AP -10) Trunk Storm Sever Outlet Project 400 Our File No. 49303 Dear Mayor and Council: 0tc. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. A'mh A. Gmd.n Themm E'. Nor Rchort w.'R Repro G. &1h ... M. P.E. M.n. L. So b. P.E. Lo..ld C. &Wry 1. P.E. fmy A. Bourton, P E. Mark A. H... P.E. rm K. FWU. P.E. .MRbrl T. Fnlm.nn, P.E. Raba R. Pl�pmr. P.F. D..d L. A... P. E. Ch.d. A. Emkm. L. M. P.w . H.Mn .V. Own Transmitted herewith is our report for Oak Cliff Pond Outlet, Project 400. This report covers trunk storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a • mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC. _�Ira4z a --Z', I I -,I � Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct super- vision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under 'the laws of the State of Minnesota. YGit Mark A. Hanson, P.E. i Date: May 3, 1984 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works • Date: 6Jr G. P.E. o 01 Rn 1.. R W. Rohn W. Ron M, P.E. A.dr, k, P.E. B. fd d A. 4mbn, P. E. Rmb E. r.mr. P.E. loon C. Ghon. P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. A'mh A. Gmd.n Themm E'. Nor Rchort w.'R Repro G. &1h ... M. P.E. M.n. L. So b. P.E. Lo..ld C. &Wry 1. P.E. fmy A. Bourton, P E. Mark A. H... P.E. rm K. FWU. P.E. .MRbrl T. Fnlm.nn, P.E. Raba R. Pl�pmr. P.F. D..d L. A... P. E. Ch.d. A. Emkm. L. M. P.w . H.Mn .V. Own Transmitted herewith is our report for Oak Cliff Pond Outlet, Project 400. This report covers trunk storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a • mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC. _�Ira4z a --Z', I I -,I � Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct super- vision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under 'the laws of the State of Minnesota. YGit Mark A. Hanson, P.E. i Date: May 3, 1984 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works • Date: 6Jr • SCOPE: This project includes the construction of trunk storm sewer which will provide an outlet for Oak Cliff Pond. Oak Cliff Pond is designated as Pond AP -10 in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. Oak Cliff Pond is located west of Slaters Road and south of Cliff Road (Co. Rd. No. 32). FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one con- tract. DISCUSSION: Trunk storm sewer proposed herein includes providing an outlet for Oak Cliff Pond (AP -10). Trunk storm sewer includes a submersible lift station located -on the south side of Oak Cliff Pond as shown on the attached drawing. The lift station will include two 115 gallon per minute pumps at 5.0 • horsepower each. Also included is a 4" diameter force main which will convey storm water from Pond AP -10 to Pond AP -10A. A 12" diameter gravity storm • sewer will convey storm water from Pond AP -LOA to an existing 24" diameter storm sewer in Slaters Road at James Street. Pond AP -10B located directly west of Slaters Road at James Street will discharge directly into the 12" di- ameter gravity storm sewer from Pond AP-IOA. Access to the lift station will be provided by constructing a 12' wide gravel drive from Slaters Road across Outlet C. It is assumed for purposes of this report that Slaters Road will be open cut for storm sewer construction. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Assessment Area Oak Cliff Addition Outlot B, C, D, E, F Page. 1. 0661c 64 0 COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $98,080 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 27.5% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Storm sewer included herein is trunk. Trunk area assessments for storm sewer have been previously assessed under Project No. 186 for this area. However, the assessment amount was determined at the agriculture (single—family) rate. Since that time the zoning classifications for certain outlots within Oak Cliff Addition have been defined under the Winkler/Jackson Planned Unit Development Agreement. It is therefore proposed to assess those Outlots at the 1984 rate for their present zoning less the 1984 rate for the zoning at which they were previously assessed (agricultural). Trunk rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: • Single Family $0.045/sq.ft. Multiple Rate $0.057/sq.ft. Commercial $0.068/sq.ft. REVENUE: Revenue to cover the cost of this project is as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance STORM SEWER Trunk $98,080 Trunk Area Assessment $27,963 $98,080 $27,963 —$70,117 The estimated trunk fund balance is —$70,117. It is assumed this amount will be the responsibility of the trunk storm sewer fund. • Page 2. 0661c 47 0 • • PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report May 1, 1984 Public Hearing June 5, 1984 Approve Plans and Specifications June 5, 1984 Open Bids June 29, 1984 Award Contract July 3, 1984 Construction Completion Fall, 1984 Final Assessment Hearing Spring, 1985 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Spring, 1986 0661c Page 3. No' APPENDIX A • PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10) TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET PROJECT NO. 400 500 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sever in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. $ 13,000 2 Each Std. 4' dia. MH v/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each 2,000 LUMP SUM Lift Station No. 1 @ $37,100.00/L.S. 37,100 10 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than '8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 6,000 450 Lin.ft. 4" DIP Force main @ $10.00/lin.ft. 4,500 ' LUMP SUM Gravel access drive @ $3,500.00/L.S. 3,500 150 Sq.yds. Bituminous mixture for patch @ $20.00/sq.yd. 3,000 30 Lin.ft. Concrete curb b gutter @ $15.00/lin.ft. 450 • 2.0 Acres Seed v/mulch b fertilizer @ $2,000.00/acre 4,000 - Total $73,550 +52 Contingencies 3,680 $77,230 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 20,850 TOTAL ............................................. $98,080 1 Page 4. 0661c APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10) TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET PROJECT NO. 400 • 0661c 0 Page 5. 76 Assessable Parcel Present Area Credit Area Total Description Zoning (sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate/sq.ft. Assessment OAK CLIFF ADDITION Outlot B. Multiple 549,600 Pond 224,000 260,480 $0.012 $ 3,125 Str. 65,120 OutIot C Multiple 387,200 Pond 59,200 262,400 0.012 3,149 Str. 65,600 • Outlot D Commercial 345,600 Str. 69,120 276,480 0.023 6,359 Outlot E -Commercial 394,800 Str. 78,960 315,840 0.023 7,264 Outlot F Commercial 438,400 Str. 87,680 350,720 0.023 8,066 TOTAL .............................. $27,963 • 0661c 0 Page 5. 76 C. S. A. H. NO. 32 4a1� \�S RAVEL ACCESS ROAD OAK CLIFF POND AP -'10 ' N.W.L. 919.7 H.W.L. 924.0 LIFT STATION 4" FORCEMAIN POND AP-IOA N.W.L. 946.0 i H.W.L. 946.7 m' 0.5 AC. FT. I POND AP -108 N.W.L. 945.0 JAMES ST. H.W.L. 948.5 \2 2.0 AC. FT. 0 400 SCALE IN FEET TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT ® COMMERCIAL RATE ® MULTIPLE RATE OAK CLIFF POND ( AP -10 ) TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK Q ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers • St. Paul. Minn. EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: MAY, 1984 F'KUJ. 1 11 Comm.49303 11 400 yellL Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Eighteen PROJECT 398/STREETS 8 UTILITIES C. Project 398, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Streets B Utilities) -- On May 15, the City Council opened a public hearing to discuss the feasibility of installing streets and utilities to service the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition under Project 398. During that public hearing, the developer requested that the scope of the project be reduced from what was originally requested and anticipated due to current market conditions. Subsequently, the City Council continued the public hearing until June 5 and ordered the feasibil- ity report to be revised to incorporate the scope of the project intended to be developed under the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Therefore, enclosed on pages _73 through _0 is a copy of the "revised" feasibility report for Project 398 relating to the final plat configuration previously discussed by the City Council under the final plat application of the Consent Agenda for the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Because this is a continua- tion of the public hearing held on May 15 and the revised report did not incorporate any additional properties that were not previously included in the original report, no additional notifica- tions were published in the legal newspaper. However, a copy • of the revised feasibility report has been provided to the developer for his information prior to the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 398 for the installation of streets and utilities for the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. • _7z 0 REPORT Con SUN CLIFF 2nd ADDITION UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO.398 REVISED EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE N0.49300 BmeA&042, /tOdelie, lgmd," ii 9 rgddociated, Jnc. e :,q'e 73 Baxe�ww ��ww.�.ww u�_''I` �//����� �/� &iewe, y'7 yQ,pC{�,(,�',Y ,B�('. Gh R. COW. P.E. £nlh A. Car P.E. Y ala G. Bonru.Oo, P.E. . IA0.6 NO.a. P.G R'. R.. P.E. R'M M'. Fawn. P.E. Ja h C. AM1111A. P.E. RO G. &h.wh'. P.E. 2335 W/. 7WA WVA..? 36 B.. Pm A. P.E. M.rv,. L. SO A.. P.E. Sl. P..r All. .-,- 55.fm ft&M E. Turns. P.E. D ..&C. B.,V d,. P.E. J.m C. OLo.. P.L. Jfny A. Bo.NO., P.L. PA... 612.636-4600 Mm* A. H.., P.E. TN K. F . P.E M~ F. P.E. RO R. fy Jfj e. P.F Oa.E LaY O... P.E. April 16, 1984 Ch A. Enrlan lAa M. Po.H,IY ' Habn M. Olm. Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mo. 55121 Re: Sun Cliff 2nd Addition Utility b Street Improvements Project No. 398 - Revised File No. 49300 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Sun Cliff 2nd Addition Utility and Street Improvements, Project 398. This report covers utility and street im- provements to service Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. • We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROA, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the tate of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: April 16, 1984 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by Phoma.9AC-olbert, P.E. Director of Public Works • Date: .j � y Y 0368c / • SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer and streets to service the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Sun Cliff 2nd Addition is located south of Co. Rd. 30, between Beaver Dam Road and Blackhawk Road and includes 81 single family lots. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plan for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out in one contract. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes 8 inch diameter lat- eral sanitary sewers to properly service the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Sun Cliff 2nd Addition will be served by laterals constructed within the pro- posed streets at a proper depth to service the abutting lots. All sewers in • this project will connect to sewers in the Sun Cliff 1st Addition. Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes 6 inch diameter laterals and a 16 inch trunk water main to properly service the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addi- • tion. A 16 inch diameter trunk water main was constructed under Project 317 in the west boulevard of Blackhawk Road from Co. Rd. 30 to a point 1,850 feet south of Co. Rd. 30. This trunk main would be extended to the south limits of Sun Cliff 2nd Addition as a part of this project. Lateral water mains pro- posed herein will connect to water mains in Sun Cliff lot Addition as well as the previously mentioned trunk water main on Blackhawk Road. Also included are the required number of valves and hydrants. Services - Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed 15 feet beyond the property line. Service lines are proposed to be 4 inch diame- ter for sanitary sewer and 1 inch diameter for water. Page 1. 0368c %S Storm Sewer - The storm sewer holding pond' designated as Pond AP -7 is located • at the northeast corner of future Suri Cliff Additions. It is proposed to ex- tend an 18 inch diameter storm sewer from the Sun Cliff 1st Addition through the 2nd Addition. This storm sewer will serve portions of the 2ndAddition and will be extended to provide an outlet to Pond AP -7 when future Sun Cliff Additions are developed. Also included is a lateral storm sewer which will convey drainage from Fox Ridge Court to Pond AP -23. The outlet for Pond AP -23 will be constructed by Mn/DOT as part of I -35E to an existing storm sewer in Rahn Road. Street - Street construction proposed herein includes construction of a 32 foot wide street constructed to a 7 ton residential design thickness'with sur- mountable concrete 'curb and gutter in conjunction with the required restora- tion for boulevards. It is assumed that grading of the streets will be done by the developer prior to the start of this project. • AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA N 1/2 SECTION 29 Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Parcel 014-28) Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Parcel 012-09) COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: Sanitary Sever $ 85,860 Water Main 120,270 Services 68,850 Storm Sever 41,310 Street 177,390 TOTAL ............. $493,680 • Page 2. 0368c 76 The total estimated project cost is $493,680 which includes contingencies • and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 27% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. Trunk area sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer have been previously assessed to this area as a part of Project 236. SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the cost of the new lateral sanitary severs for this project equally to all the lots in the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. WATER MAIN: Water main proposed herein is separated into trunk and lateral water main. It is proposed to assess a lateral benefit from trunk for half the length of the 16 inch trunk water main along Blackhawk Road. The remain- ing costs associated with the 16 inch trunk main will be the responsibility of • the trunk fund. It is proposed to assess the cost of the lateral water main and the lateral benefit from the trunk main equally to all the lots in Sun • Cliff 2nd Addition. SERVICES: It is proposed that all services be 4 inch sever and 1 inch water services and that they extend 15 feet into the property. It is proposed to assess the total cost of the services equally to all the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the cost of the new lateral storm sewer equally to all the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. STREET: Street construction proposed herein is to be assessed equally to all the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. Trunk rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: 0368c Page 3. 77 LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK Lateral benefit from a trunk water main ......... $21.68 centerline ft. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: A.) SANITARY SEWER Lateral Lateral Assessment 8.) WATER MAIN. Lateral Trunk Lateral Assessment Lateral Benefit from Trunk C.) SERVICES Lateral Lateral Assessment D.) STORM SEWER Lateral Lateral Assessment Project Cost $ 85,860 $ 85,860 $ 82,698 37,572 $ 68,850 $ 68,850 $ 41,310 Page 4. 0368c 79 Revenue Balance $ 85,860 $ 85,860 - 0 - $ 82,698 4,762 $ 87,460 -$32,810 $ 68,850 $ 68,850 $ 41,310 $ 41,310 - 0 - 0 • • E.) STREET • Lateral Lateral Assessment • • $177,390 $177,390 $177,390 $177,390 - 0 - TOTAL ................ -$32,810 The total estimated trunk fund balance for this project is -$32,810 which will be the responsibility of the trunk water fund. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report June 5, 1984 Public Hearing. . June 5, 1984 Approve Plans and Specifications June 5, 1984 Open Bids July 2, 198,+ Award Contract July 3, 1984 Construction Completion Fall, 1984 Final Assessment Hearing Winter, 1985 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1986 0368c Page 5. 79 B.) WATER MAIN 900 Lin.ft. APPENDIX A $ 23,400 3,800 • 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $11.00/lin.ft. 41,800 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE Each Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each 6,300 1 Each SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION 1,800 10 Each Resilient wedge gate valve b box in pl, @ $350.00/ea, 3,500 PROJECT NO. 398 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 5,200 A.) SANITARY SEWER Each Connect to Ex. 16" DIP @ $400.00/each 400 3,000 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer, 10'-15' dp, in pl, @ $13.00/l.f. $ 39,000 Cu.yds. 14 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each Lin.ft. 12,600 4,700 50 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp, in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft. $ 90,190 3,000 4 Lin.ft. Outside drop for MH in pl. @ S150.00/lin.ft. 600 $ 94,700 30 Lin.ft. 4" CISP Service riser in pl. @ $10.00/lin.ft. 25,570 • 300 84 Each 8"x4" wye in pl. @ $40.00/each 3,360 222.5 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,225 3,000 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 3,000 1 Each Connect to existing MH @ $300.00/each 300 Total $ 64,385 +5X Contingencies 3,220 $ 67,605 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 18,255 • A.) TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................. $ 85,860 B.) WATER MAIN 900 Lin.ft. 16" DIP Water main in pl. @ $26.00/lin,ft. $ 23,400 3,800 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $11.00/lin.ft. 41,800 7 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each 6,300 1 Each 16" Butterfly valve 6 box in pl, @ $1,800.00/each 1,800 10 Each Resilient wedge gate valve b box in pl, @ $350.00/ea, 3,500 4,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 5,200 1 Each Connect to Ex. 16" DIP @ $400.00/each 400 2 Each Connect to Ex. 6" DIP @ $300.00/each 600 249 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,490 4,700 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 4,700 Total $ 90,190 +52 Contingencies 4,510 $ 94,700 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest 25,570 • B.) TOTAL WATER MAIN ................................ $120,270 Page 6. 0368c • 5.) SERVICES 3,600 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer service in pl. @ $6.00/lin.ft. 3,600 Lin.ft. 1" Type "K" copper water service in pl. @ $5.10/L.f. 82 Each 1" Corporation stop in pl. @ $20.00/each 82 Each 1" Curb atop b box in pl. @ $70.00/each 4,290 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies • • +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest C.) TOTAL SERVICES ................................. D.) STORM SEWER 650 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-15' dp. in pl. @ $26.00/1.£. 260 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp, in pl. @ $19.00/lin.ft. 3 Each Std. 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. in pl. @ $950.00/each 2 Each CB w/cstg. in pl. @ $800.00/each 20 Lin.ft. MH Depth greater than 8' dp. in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 1 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard in pl. @ $540.00/ea. . 4 Cu.yds. Rip rap in pl. @ $50.00/cu.yd. 84 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 910 .Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1 Acres Seed with mulch in pl. @ $1,000.00/Ac. 0368c Total +5% Contingencies $ 21,600 18,360 1,640 5,740 4.290 $ 51,630 2,580 $ 54,210 14.640 $ 68,850 $ 16,900 4,940 2,850 1,600 1,200 540 200 840 910 1,000 S 30,980 1,550 $ 32,530 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 8,780 D.) TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................ $ 41,310 Page 7. I E.) STREET TOTAL • 1,200 Cu.yda. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. $ 3,600 600 Cu.yds. Select Granular borrow @ $4.50/cu.yd. 2,700 13,960 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $0.25/sq.yd. 3,490 4,600 Tons Cl. 5 100% crushed quarry rock in pl. @ $7.00/ton 32,200 1,150 Tons 2331 Bituminous base course in pl. @ $11.00/ton 12,650 1,150 Tons 2341 Bituminous wear course in pl. @ $12.00/ton 13,800 130 Tons Bituminous material for mixture in pl. @ $200.00/ton 26,000 600 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat in pl. @ $1.20/gal. 720 6,900 Lin.ft. Surmoutable concrete curb and gutter in pl. @ $4.50/l.f. 31,050 1,860 Lin.ft. Reinforcing for concrete C. b G. in pl. @ $1.00/l.f. 1,860 18 Each Adjust MH or CB frame @ $120:00/each 2,160 8 Each Adjust GV box @ $100.00/each 800 2 Acres Seed w/mulch in pl. @ $1,000.00/Ac. 2,000 Total $133,030 +5% Contingencies 6,650 $139,680 +27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest 37,710 • E.) TOTAL STREET ................................... ..$177,390 0368c A. TOTAL SANITARY SEWER $ 85,860 B. TOTAL WATER MAIN I 120,270 C. TOTAL SERVICES . 68,850 D. TOTAL STORM SEWER 41;310 E. TOTAL STREET 177,390 TOTAL ................... $493,680 Page 8. �'v2' • APPENDIX B • PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION PROJECT NO. 398 A. SANITARY•SEWER u Page 9. 0368c �3 No. of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost N 1/2, SECTION 29 SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $1,060 $ 24,380 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 '$1,060 12,720 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $1,060 20,140 Block 4, Lots 1 6 2 2 $1,060 2,120 Block 5, Lot 1 1 $1,060 1,060 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $1,060 25,440 TOTAL 81 $ 85,860 B. WATER MAIN • No, of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost 1) LATERALS SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $1,021 $ 23,482 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 $1,021 12,252 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $1,021 19,398 Block 4, Lots 1 & 2 2 $1,021 2,042 Block 5, Lot 1 1 $1,021 1,021 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $1,021 24,503 TOTAL 148 (1) $ 82,698 u Page 9. 0368c �3 2) LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK (439.33' @ $10.84/FF - $4,762) C. SERVICES No. of Lots Cost/Lot No. of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $59 '$1,352 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 $59 706 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $59 1,117 Block 4, Lots 1 6 2 2 $59 118 Block 5, Lots 1 1 $59 59 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $59 1,410 81 $4,762 C. SERVICES Page 10. 0368c / �f E • No. of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $850 $ 19,550 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 $850 10,200 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $850 16,150 Block 4, Lots 1 & 2 2 $850 1,700 Block 5, Lots 1 1 $850 850 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $850 20,400 TOTAL 148 .$ 68,850 D. STORM SEWER No. of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $510 $ 11,730 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 $510 6,120 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $510 9,690 Block 4, Lots 1 6 2 2 $510 1,020 Block 5, Lots 1 1 $510 510 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $510 12,240 TOTAL 81 $ 41,310 Page 10. 0368c / �f E • • E. STREET No. of Lots Cost/Lot Total Cost SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 23 $2,190 $ 50,370 Block 2, Lots 1-12 12 $2,190 26,280 Block 3, Lots 1-19 19 $2,190 41,610 Block 4, Lots 1 6 2 2 $2,190 4,380 Block 5, Lots 1 1 $2,190 2,190 Block 6, Lots 1-24 24 $2,190 52,560 TOTAL 81 $177,390 • 0368c Page 11. P5 PROJECT 398 - REVISED SUMMARY COST/LOT 0368c Page 12. 0 • Sanitary Lateral Ben- Storm, Legal Sever Water efit from Sever Total Description Lateral Lateral Water Main Services Lateral Street Cost/Lot SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-23 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,690 Block 2, Lots 1-12 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,690 Block 3, Lots 1-19 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,690 Block 4, Lots 1 & 2 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,690 Block 5, Lots 1 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,690 Block 6, Lots 1-24 $1,060 $1,021 $59 $850 $510 $2,190 $5,60 0368c Page 12. 0 • C, SUN C1 F -F 2nd ADDITION UTUITY s &THEM UAPROvwcmm PROJMT NOZ98 REVISED EAGA_N, MUTNESOTA SANITARY SEWER a Nil . .., 2" ,... cor w .9300 i I //I Nil . .., 2" ,... cor w .9300 ® LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK SUN CLIFF 2nd ADDITION UTUJTT • STPAW ntmvntwra PROD= No.m RMww RAGAN, MINNESOTA WATER MAIN Dl�! Y� il• �� �. GD' no -9i00 L • 0 0 0 9 SUN CLIFF tad ADDITION l Tu2rT k mm MIROVtMMM PROJBUT MOMS REVISED FAGAN, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER �r �a mss■ • NmL OL i i pit[ ". [., .9[• EOr� W 1[]00 MUINEWTA STREETS • W"- w B. l... ms .0. ""a 0 II • Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Nineteen • • VACATE UTILITY EASEMENT/LAKESIDE ESTATES D. Vacate Utility Easement, Lakeside Estates -- On May 1, the City Council received a petition for the vacation of a drainage and utility easement over Lots 3 and 13, Block 1, Lakeside Estates, and subsequently scheduled a public hearing to be held on June 5. Enclosed on page is a location map referencing the utility easements to be vacated. As can be seen, these utility easements are centered down the referenced lots due to the previous lot split which has since been rescinded and these lots have now reverted to their original configuration. Notification of this drainage and utility easement vacation has been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected private utility companies. As of this date, the staff has not received any objection to this proposed vacation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED -ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny. the vacation of drainage and utility easements over Lots 3 and 13, Block 1, Lakeside Estates. 9/ ' .. - - fes.. t . �! T --: r•.-� �{•� � '6..^ •i�� (�. .a4trs �� at•te ♦.. wo i PART OF �A��•: .Cl. • _ PART OF 010-82 �. b010'62 �' \ -•r -.. a PO My d Ealoo PARK Iw• rm ma., ..ew1 010-00 ,a PROPOSED VAC TIONS _9_ •'�j',I1011IslillgsI,' e, dw � _ ■ ro �`F� _ � dry 4 4 •: , t a •ae. �� r • b • bxr • neo S a � f' ' ATLAN7 •ran _ ,•. \ V ' e�•.w, •i' ` •I f -0 a• £MILL '•e to 1• .. 11 ` (� w�b ORIV •.w rb • r!a •/•'Z`\ •d y' d.. ' •' _,� ✓` E b All�4IsI,, Iwo •Nj °° ni' Nom/ ''y"�¢ • dr ~• Coy c • m ree ajO - • 10 +F' my : we. • _ i �YV• 4 t _ 1 $' • G9 all -� • t .w wo 'm S,U : 1• 8 If .'? �- O}n5 �•. to L. n., .j .:..�: \r �_ 41 • ••°ertr. J •W rm •b r•r • • 8 •.a• . m•u.i .a ! :I8 d !1 p n Is Is Is Is ONO ati _ � • �� '`�� b Iwo 020-00'Pp•� •'a_•, "'m-�.` t ♦: - \ � � � pP�• u:•'- :. .,:_ a a_ w:V?•:' Y - .r. Q120-011 " ;4 NORTH ant GREENLEAF ^ro ��d woo e•an 6 ti ' ♦h 1 s v Qi 1 noo uao to re •-1111, u.n atb Q r ��oz •S. r•• ♦. SRM y$ o E w• F q _ ; 13D-01 0 �. �. i .zw 6W _ it O b-' • _ • • Y Q N m • N g• LO 1� ! ;S =_ - Agenda Information June 5, 1984, City • Page Twenty Memo Council Meeting VACATE STREET EASEMENT/TWIN VIEW MANOR 2ND ADDITION E. Vacate Street Easement, Twin View Manor 2nd Addition -- When the Twin View Manor 2nd Addition was developed, Richard's Court did not have access to Cliff Road by way of Thomas Lane which was to be platted as a part of the Walden Heights lst Addition. Subsequently, as a part of the development agreement, the City required the developer to install a temporary road access from Richard's Court out to Cliff Road across a street easement over the west 50 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Twin View Manor 2nd Addition. With the subsequent platting of Walden Heights lst Addition and the construction of Thomas Lane and a portion of Richard's Court during 1983, this street easement is no longer necessary. Therefore, the staff initiated the public hearing to vacate this street easement so that the developer can remove the temporary access road and develop the lot in its platted residential manner. All notices of this public hearing have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected public and private utilities. Due to the fact that there are existing public and private utilities within this area, it is recommended that the vacation be approved for street access only and that all public utility and dr inage easements • be retained as necessary. Enclosed on page 4!is a location map showing the street easement vacation to be considered at this public hearing. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of a street easement over Lot 1, Block 1, Twin View Manor 2nd Addition. ,�3 61 !' OZ > a P\.vdct�.m I g�e� 'j I IZ 81�Jpor-';I (i`T plL15^ LI N II f O i _ — _ _ — — — SZ ZI gl 14 - . •`OY Ql l CItY of . is .7 r 18 B: L. . L__••Sd._.11: WALDEN E HEIGHTS °°°" 1 :.�....•�.,�. RK .�Oy,wIS_-••ee w,1� men— 'tY--':i:�y' r-•;oo.S• •C;I . a'^'� 'mm 1 bam� 1�- II ',w•i°rry ie 6�iY a-`� 1 C51_ •I e •iu1 N \ DI �' Gci) kir •.eat__ •vow (\ I1" E;Y I �, Ij '�� dIS6 0 A 3AItl0 r iv^ •'' ( kn} r-` •., g 5 S rT•- �._ }l 11 0. v / I I � I r, � Y\ .\ I a B �F� � q Y f j@tiR1 rY&'�1/I+�1W.v• p.?a°j 1` 11 11 �8 a y\' 6 i/� I II gI1I \la �1�0. �' n \'9 �•i)' �l•_� a •- J •�'2 i. SII .�rrri'• 91 p.j3 I� 1 91 9 JIxLy� -JIB x114 t;\ b I`N,y) p _ /J•�'�{a�'N.' I1� •�� /•,6 Itlw � '� 4d� � f„r:,e�� "'hb"( a�;+•�!�" �II rna•d.Iwd-4r�'J:�'9, / 1 116,,.�� �` I✓r�_ _ I' II f1 II 11 I1 ♦l;+• tyvi� \i _Ji._mulfregla°�l._ Y�f �.r'N� ,a -�•T 7.__e1 r�.,b s•rJ �. svi• _ J I_ aa�1 J 1-- � J ew 1 � . 6 � �•a �•-.� r. •�T /gv r on�rpj I ` °i; � 8r q rm wn :. rw iam'. nmdao 'uao __r '44d ..i—�. ter: s�••'.. G .1 / ) J a b��C rm .. 00 ,:.J •�� . f ', i n• tl wr � i y a'( �>%P ("EOia \II / I.. ' 1• •s {Ir7� -�tpi4Ko� — IT •-I ',. �_ Y IQ\N��.� N p N 1•,r ' 1.� 4 1 8 ♦�� 8 � i•4tyLvl rw�-lf mw -1 P�•"adol��lai'0'\`\ Z +�\.1r�I,�� q {�_ Gaaya 1i�� �1 F • -d 8 N • .R W • �8 A 1 I OI N fosm N Y ✓ ., dG L Ig 1 a£af � I w'•751#d •IN CD.0 rBCI IY S b l_�P_o8�1111 I ° �Y ��\.•^n// II 71\ /Iti`~�Iron I I' nm •arr 7rl _ JL L evl J8_ ZOT D a '• RICHA LANE 1 --e ro'ri •ee w- 1° _ • m• •1q -.0 u n rr•ro' em u• w n• 1w 1.. Iar • 2 `l . � __ /-[y`/--'rii r• — AI$ '11�'/��(+_y I" 9 e C O d d n e , �_ D • V C..•..,_7^maw mid O� .i ,oro �L. r •eW fv t l >1 %'6 •rte @'LY a 99v m. • 1; •ruuS � + 4 ` r '. Ot i /Y •W.M •'iy��� 4 n r a .iJ`• n ii1L %.tear d O • � ,A � qaJ d SF a • Y I w•r• q salts 8Lv ! , ERIK'S BOULEV4RD r �".• , „r.O ,,, ., W SyY sdoii�� W B r ie...•'7. rl i•iia• I2Z -Ton ...j = rwpa.a• . / . _ @ to N •� w �WN 6 Wr mn 4 ; •am •r Nit, •- aw• t •i 3; CO. RD y en i� n•n-"° ur eeo 11n sae. ro uo m O O a O 0o w •� - "u IS • u E n. 1 I 1. e•• up 1m 1m NO. s,� 31 (PILOT "Iwoe RD 1 \ Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Twenty-One • REZONING/DRENCKHAHN A. Alan J. and Baerbel C. Drenckhahn for Rezoning from A to RB Consisting of Approximately .68 Acres -- A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on May 29, 1984, to consider two applications as submitted by Alan J. and Baerbel C. Drenckhahn. The first application consisted of a rezoning to change the land use from an Agricultural to a Roadside Business classification and the second application was for a preliminary plat containing one (1) commercial lot. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the rezoning subject to the beauty parlor use, and the import business only being allowed for a three-year term and that the existing facility could not be expanded until utilities and platting have been applied for. A motion was therefore granted to waive the platting requirements at this time noting there is an existing building on the lot and that future use would include the expansion or addition of land to the north and to allow construction of a fully authentic German restaurant. Enclosed on pages through /a 6 is a copy of the City Planner's report • regarding these applications. Also enclosed is a copy of the minutes of the Advisory Planning Commission meeting, found on page (s) /07 -.f' /O 7:t- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to RB and to approve or deny the waiver of platting requirements for the Drenckhahn property. E 95 • J • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT 8 REZONING TO RB (ROADSIDE BUSINESS) APPLICANT: ALAN J. 8 BAERBEL C. DRENCKHAHN LOCATION: PART OF THE SEi OF THE NEi OF SECTION 4 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 29, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22, 1984 REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting preliminary plat approval and rezoning for approximately .68 acres located west of Pilot Knob Road and south of 494. ZONING AND LAND USE Presently the parcel is zoned A (Agricultural) and would not allow any further development until the property was rezoned. The Compre- hensive Guide designates this parcel as RB (Roadside Business District) which would allow development in accordance with freeway access and service to the transient population. The applicant is proposing to zone in accordance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan and requests a zoning of RB (Roadside Business) for this particular parcel. COMMENTS The applicant is proposing to remodel the 1,354 square foot struc- ture into a gift shop and hair salon. The proposed plan conforms to the setback, parking and lot coverage requirements of the City Code. The applicant is presently operating a beauty parlor as a home occupation. This business would relocate to the proposed new location. The main issue seems to be whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the RB designation being applied for. The Drenck- hahn's long range plan would include the acquisition and rezoning to RB of the land north of the subject parcel for construction of a German restaurant. If this is accomplished, the RB zoning would be contiguous and conforming to the Land Use Guide Plan designation. If approved the plat should be subject to the following conditions: 1) The plat be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review since it abuts a county road. 2) The plan be submitted to the City Engineering Department for approval of the drainage and grading alterations. 94 0 ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION ALAN J. & BAERBEL DRENCKHAHN MAY 29, 1984 PAGE 2. 3) An appropriate bond be obtained to insure conformance with the landscaping plan. 4) All other City ordinances shall be adhered to. 97 • • E IN..FOR t-1 'OT, • J ` + 358 358' -NIn- 11 1 PPI`PFN'IV _[W P114Q •' �m 1 _ I it j(wjFl4*,k 4r s' J v 0 0 cr • a;w YY ud.. -NIn- 11 1 PPI`PFN'IV _[W P114Q •' �m 1 _ I it j(wjFl4*,k 4r s' J v 0 0 cr j/.•moi '�r�''""i{•--- - - *LOST SPUR / COUNTRY CLUB PF _•may � ..,,..y � �Q � in do i / - [VALLEY I i I - ®- R-1 R-1 11 r_i LB R . RLI TREF LE (ACRE5-1 / o {UNDII1 I �A I I I1 'a I I I I -4I R-4 -il R-4 t.-2 IV I L- , •o L/ v i 1-I n r J 77-- N MM- 808- 2 - 10 • " � TIN T VJ*#LH GB �� `��4%. Mrawfill ME L,gn rr — PF u a 10, N A PrA W n %DDI1 NB NNW L /r / Ga .6 .... !Y.RB Ind 1 ' • ..., riQ_. - / •r ..: s.� p Ind„ PL �- .. • '%-- _ .� .. Ina .*'--�• �7 :,_��..'�f�,j�(.�g� '.._.---- fl GE 6ROSEMOUNQ�_ a_ MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION • C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: RICHARD M. HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: MAY 25, 1984 SUBJECT: DRENCKHAHN PRELIMINARY PLAT The Engineering Division of the Department of Public Works has the following comments concerning this proposed development for consideration by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. GRADING/DRAINAGE A detailed grading plan will be required indicating how storm water run-off from the parking area will be handled. UTILITIES Existing utilities capable of providing service to this proposed development consists of only a 12" trunk watermain located along the the westside of Pilot Knob Road. However, this proposed development lies within the N -J sanitary sewer sub -district as depicted in Figure 1. At this time, there are no lateral sanitary sewer mains in this sub -district. The closest sanitary sewer • to this proposed development is located approximately 300 feet east of Pilot Knob Road in Corporate Center Drive (Old Eagan Industrial Road). This is approximately 500 feet from this proposed development. Although preliminary review by staff indicates the sewer is deep enough in this location, it would not be feasible to extend this sewer any further west due to the fact that existing pavement would have to be removed and replaced and it would not be enough room without obtaining an easement or removing and replacing the bituminous pathway along the westside of Pilot Knob Road to install a sewer line to service this parcel. Besides, the amount of area which could be served by this sewer would be limited since the land in this area generally slopes to the west. Therefore, it would appear to be more appropriate to service sub -district N -J from laterals from the trunk sanitary sewer located within this sub -district. Servicing this proposed development with sanitary sewer at this time may not be all that appropriate when one considers the immedi- ate proposed use being for a beauty salon and gift shop. However, it would be imperative that sanitary sewer be available if and when this proposed development includes the restaurant facility which was mentioned at the previous Planning Commission meeting by the applicants. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY • A fifty -foot public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob Road as a condition of this plat. In addition, a ten -foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all publicly dedicated right-of-way with a five-foot utility and /0/ I ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 24, 1984 PAGE TWO • drainage easement being dedicated adjacent to all exterior lot lines. ASSESSMENTS As a condition of final platting, this development shall be respon- sible for trunk area storm sewer and lateral benefit from trunk watermain. In addition to the above assessments which would be determined at the commercial rate, the water area assessment must be upgraded from residential to commercial. All assessment rates will be the rates which are in effect at the time of final platting. At this time, the above assessments would amount to the following: Water Area - .578 Acres X $2,830 per acre = $1,662 - $150 (1972 Single Family Rate Assessed) = $1,512 Trunk Area .Storm Sewer - 25,560 Square Feet X $.068 per square foot = $1,738 Lateral Benefit From Trunk Water - 83 Feet X $17.87 per front foot = $1,483 • I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report with the Advisory Planning Commission at their meeting of May 29, 1984. Respectfully sub fitted, Richard M. Hef P.E. Assistant City Engineer ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS I) A detailed grading & drainage plan shall be submitted for approval by Staff. 2) A 50' public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob Road, along with easements as referenced in this report. 3) This development shall be responsible for trunk water and storm sewer area assessments and lateral benefit from trunk watermain at the rates in effect at final platting. • s. MENDOTA \ 'HTS • :� - North \ , Flnterceptor \ GUN CLV9 _ , —:v. ` 5 N -L'. \\ \\:� •. v 3U"- ♦ �• _LaE _ - /.'.�.�---ppv.L//r��..LL �J a SU �CT� F71 CSL / Qi N=H N -N - \�/ f —� I!S' `I♦ 1 36'L Lu TPrrrLE]CP-G I �r , ' /. / ♦� ihl h$rPrSt W.HK -O[I 83 36"�= �i N -G / — 15" I� _ •� 112" N -P ��• I fir" 12" d I. �I / I I 15 N-0 /®- I / C -C --I 1 1 •_// N -E -B 1 P N - V N -U I /. - 26 30" r— ------- I 12° _ 7C7D rat I12It sop rktiww; ;`m acres . .d,• / 12' 12'• .`�c, �� 1 5 C-00 C -NN ; 29 ;�LAKE- �a6 �_�s- ` 33 _Ti■■ ■\/t1� n: .. — _�'S�(j�� _ _ 112" OLCCK�441 V^� ` / • M ET ,.1 --- S W� c• C , r APC AFTERNOON AFTER • May 29, 1984 The following is a brief account of what transpired at the May 29, 1984, Advisory Planning Commission meeting. OLD BUSINESS A. ALAN J. AND BAERBEL C. DRAENCKHAHN, for rezoning A (Agricul- tural) to RB (Roadside Business) consisting of approximately .68 acres and Preliminary Plat also of consisting of the .68 acres and containing one (1) commercial lot. In part of the SE; of the NE;, Section 4 west of Pilot Knob Road. Discussion and Action Advisory Planning Commission noted that this item has been on the agenda for several meetings and that the applicants have now submit- ted a request to plot the property along with the original request to rezone from Agricultural to Roadside Business. The Planning Commission reviewed this particular item in two parts. First the proposed zoning request, noting that the applicants are proposing to rezone in accordance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. However, the uses may not specifically fit the RB zoning at this time but thatin the long range goal the Draenckhahns are proposing, would be consistent with RB or Roadside Business zoning. After a lengthy • discussion regarding the use of the property on a tentative basis the Commission then reviewed the Preliminary Plat noting with this plat request there will be direct access off of Pilot Knob Road. Also, there is a surface road provided to the north which would probably provide access to the westerly portion of the lot and re- move the direct access from Pilot Knob Road. The Commission noted that this is hopefully the long range plan and should be reviewed by the Engineering Department. The Commission also noted that this is also the direction or the location in which this particular parcel would have accessibility to utilities in the area. After discussing the platting versus waiving the plat and the uses propos- ed, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning subject to the beauty parlor use and import business only being allowed for a three year term and that the existing facility could not be expanded until utilities and platting has been applied for. This motion was approved unanimously by the Planning Commission. The second motion was to waive the platting requirements at this particular time noting that there is an existing building on the lot and that future use would include the expansion or addition of land to the north and a use of a full authentic German restaurant. Noting that other activity is occuring within the general area, that platting may not be too far in the future, the Commission waiv- ed this request with a condition that the applicant provide or meet the conditions set forth in the May 22, 1984 Staff Report. This item has been scheduled for the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting • for Council consideration. /0 7Z Advisory Planning Commission Afternoon After - May 29, 1984 Page Two B. SIENNA CORPORATION (ROD HARDY), for Preliminary Plat, Birch Park Addition consisting of approximately 43 acres and con- taining 73 single family lots. Located in Outlots B, C, D, and F Windcrest Second Addition. Discussion and Action r , E Advisory Planning Commission noted that this item had been continued from the April 24, 1984, Advisory Planning Commission, in order to get background information from the original platting which oc- cured in 1979. The Commission also had requested that Staff look at the accesses onto Deerwood Drive and how many access points Birch Park Addition would have. The applicants had revised their original plat and reduced four lots on Deerwood Drive, which would have 200 feet of frontage and would be more consistent with the lot sizes that presently exist along Deerwood Drive. with these revisions, The Planning Commission again reviewed this Preliminary Plat noting that.the applicant had made revisions and tried to incorporate the concerns of the Surrounding neighbors. The biggest issue that was discussed in regard to this revised plat, is the Fawn Ridge street which would be eliminated with this revised plat. As you recall, Fawn Ridge Street provided an access to a property to the west which topographically would have been hard to service from Pilot Knob • Road. The applicant also indicated that the feasibility or the cost of this road was excessive and preferred not to provide this street connection. After substantial review and input from the surrounding neighbors, the Advisory Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to the conditions of the Staff Report with the addition that driveway accesses to the lots on Deerwood Drive be reviewed and approved by City Staff in order to provide the best access in regard to topography and vegetation. Also, the Planning Commission recommended that the conditions of the original planned development initiated in 1979 also be adhered to with this revision to the Preliminary Plat. Also, that adequate storm sewer easement be obtained by this development in order to provide proper drainage across the McCarthy property. This item was originally scheduled for the June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting for Council consideration, however, the applicant is requesting that this item be placed on the June 19, 1984, City Council Meeting for Council consideration. Therefore, note this particular chage and request by the applicant. C. SIENNA CORPORATION (ROD HARDY), FOR Preliminary Plat Pilot Pointe consisting of approximately 8.8 acres and containing 20 single family lots, locted in part of the NW; of Section 22, east of Pilot Knob Road. Discussion and Action The Advisory Planning Commission reviewed the Preliminary Plat Pilot • Pointe noting that this particular plat was the parcel which /0 "5r • • • Advisory Planning Afternoon After - Page Three Commission Meeting May 29, 1984 access to be provided to from Birch Park Addition, therefore, the approval of Birch Park Addition with the elimination of Fawn Ridge Drive allowed for the cul-de-sac to be provided from Pilot Knob Road. The Preliminary Plat consists of 8.8 acres and the applicant is proposing to plat 20 single family lots all which meet or exceed the R-1 residential single district zoning requirements. Access to these lots would be from a cul-de-sac off of Pilot Knob Road. the main reason this particular plat is in at this time, is in conjunction with I -35E construction. This particular development is contingent on obtaining approximately 250,000 cubic feet of fill in order to obtain the proper grades to provide proper access to this development. After a great deal of discussion and input from the surrounding neighbors, the Advisory Planning Commission did recommend approval of this particular plat contingent on the condi- tions in the Staff Report. Also, with the addition that storm drain- age easements be obtained from the McCarthy property in order that the proper storm drainage and ponding areas can be obtained to handle the runoff from this development. The Commission also sug- gested that condition #4 of the Engineering Report be eliminated and that the north/south access easement be allowed as proposed by the developer. With these changes, the application has been scheduled for the June 19, 1984, City Council Agenda for Council consideration. D. Mr. Hall then brought up that he had received a request from Federal Land for the Commission to hold a special Public Hearing in order that Federal Lane could obtain the shortest possible pro- cessing time the schedule could allow. Federal Lan had requested that a special Planning Commission meeting be held on June 18, in order that they could save two weeks in the processing of their particular request. The Planning Commission reviewed this request noting that they have not held a special Public Hearing or special meeting to review development proposals in the past and that this particular request is not any different then the requests that they have received in the past and elected not to hold a special meeting in order to process this application. With that the Commission recommended they be placed on the regular schedule and be processed in accordance with the policies and procedures of the City. E. Dale Runkle introduced Mr. Greg Ingraham who has been hired recently in a fulltime position in the Planning Department for the City. Mr. Runkle had indicated that with an additional person in the Planning Department we will then be able to start to update studies and reports to obtain up-to-date figures and up -date portions of the Comprehensive Plan where these figures and numbers were gathered 5 years ago. The City will also be using John Voss also to help provide the information in order to update this material. There being no further business, the Planning Commission meeting adjourned approximately 9:30 p.m. 166 APC Minutes May 29, 1984 • ALAE DRAENC®AHN - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAY The public hearings regarding the application of Alan J. Draenckhahn and Baerbel Draenckhahn for rezoning from A (Agricultural) to RB (Roadside Busi- ness) and for preliminary plat approval of approximately 6.68 acres in part of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 4 on the west side of Pilot Knob Road was convened by Chairman Hall. Dale Runkle, City Planner, detailed the two applications, noting that the property is zoned Agricultural and the Comprehensive Guide designates the parcel as RB (Roadside Business District). The proposal by the applicants is to remodel the 1,354 square foot structure into a gift shop and hair salon with possible restaurant to be constructed in the future. The main issue concerned whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the RB designation, noting the land north of the parcel was intended to be purchased by the applicants. Mr. & Mrs. Draenckhahn were present and questions were raised by Planning Commission members, including whether the real estate tax value would increase because of the preliminary plat versus a waiver of plat. The proposal by the Draenckhahns at the present was to apply • for waiver of plat, rather than the final plat, noting that the parcel is intended to be expanded in the future. Mr. Runkle stated that the plat could be required at the time the restaurant is applied for. Member Wold was concerned about the RB zoning for gift shop and hair salon, noting that it may not be appropriate in RB zoned areas, according to the Ordinance. There were no objections from neighboring property owners and the Draenckhahns indicated they did not expect signage would be necessary along Pilot Knob Road. The planning commission members generally felt the application was prema- ture for platting because a curb out may not be appropriate if the service road is extended in the future. After considerable discussion, Hall moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend rezoning to RB on a conditional basis for the two uses, including hair salon and gift shop as applied for by the applicant for a maximum period of three years with the understanding that no expansion of the present use or building would be permitted during that period of time; further, that at the end of the three year period, that the applicant must then apply for and acquire approval of an application for preliminary plat approval or the conditional zoning would cease and the uses would then terminate; further, it was recommended that the Planning Commission and Council extend the time in the event that adequate hardship is shown. All voted in favor. Hall then moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend approval of an application for waiver of plat, subject to the following condi- tions: 1. That the waiver will be permitted for a maximum of three years unless hardship is shown and extended by the City Council. • 2 /0-/ - . APC Minutes May 29, 1984 2. The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's review since it abuts a county road. 3. The plan shall be submitted to the City Engineering Department for approval of the drainage and grading alterations. 4. An appropriate bond shall be obtained to insure conformance with the landscaping plan. 5. All other City ordinances shall be adhered to. 6. A detailed grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for approval by staff. 7. A 50 foot public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob Road, in addition to further easement if service road is required, along with easements as referenced in this report. 8. This development shall be responsible for trunk water and storm sewer area assessments and lateral benefit from trunk watermain at the rates • in effect at final platting. All voted in favor. 0 3 /07 a, Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -Two CONTRACT 84-11/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS B. Contract 84-11, Approve Plans 8 Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Oak Cliff Pond Outlet) -- On May 15, the staff prematurely presented the detailed plans and specifications for Council review for the installation of the lift station and force main outlet for Oak Cliff Pond within the Oak Cliff development adjacent to Slater's Road. This plan review was premature due to the fact that the technical public hearing process could not be completed until the June 5 Council meeting. With Project 400 being considered by the City Council earlier on the agenda under Public Hearings, and if it is approved, it would now be appropriate to formally approve the detailed plans and specifications then authorize the advertisement for bids. These detailed plans were prepared in advance due to the fact that the developer signed a petition guaranteeing all costs associated with the preparation should the project not be approved by Council action under the Public Hearing agenda item. All easements necessary for the installation of this project under Contract 84-11 have been acquired through the final plat of the Oak Cliff development which was approved by • Council action on April 17, 1984. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-11 and, if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 29. C, J M., Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three • PRELIMINARY PLAT/BIRCH PARK ADDITION A. Sienna Corporation for Preliminary Plat, Birch Park Addition Consisting of Approximately 43 Acres and Containing 77 Dwelling Units in Outlots B, C, D, E and F, Windcrest 2nd Addition -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on May 29, 1984, to consider a preliminary plat application for Birch Park Addition as submitted by Sienna Corporation. This item was originally scheduled for the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting. However, due to an absence by the property owner, the item is rescheduled for the June 19 meeting. There are approximately six to eight neighbors on Deerwood Drive that were noticed for the public hearing at the Advisory Planning Commission meeting and they have been notified by the Planning Department that this item will be continued until the June 19 meeting. Information regarding this item will be presented with the City Council packet for that meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a contin- uance of the preliminary plat application for Birch Park Addition until the June 19 City Council meeting. E /0 f Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Is Page Twenty -Four • WAIVER OF PLAT/OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION B. Corporate Construction for Waiver of Plat to Split a Duplex Lot for Individual Ownership, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition - An application was made for waiver of Plat to split a duplex lot for individual ownership described as Lot 2, Block 1, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition. The applicant was Corporate Construction and for additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report found on pages 11t through //�_/= - ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the Waiver of Plat as requested by Corporate Construction. //0 CITY OF EAGAN • SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND EXISTING ZONING: R-2ITION DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 5, 1984 DATE OF REPORT; JUNE 1, 1984 REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I APPLICATION SUBMITTED: ing a waiver of plat An application has ownership, in order been submitted to split a duplex lot request - COMMENTS: for individual Lot 2, Block 1, is an approved square feet which exceeds the 15,000 is a newt quare duplex lot of to divide y constructed square foot 15,505 for duplex unit which requirement. There the individual ownershi the splitting of this p Staff applicant would like subject to all lot. If approved, finds no problems with other City ordinance ruir the lot split • quirements, s should be / J Gre?g_ In r GHI:jbd attachments • SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE N /F"011"nu'i I� SED EL b h O T12 c4OPOSED°ARCELaa 5 Al 830-3-3141"W CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION 159.94 \A\\PR O .DRdY1 = N \ \ a ��+ 91I4 XHlJq �43 � Di— j \W N-- p0 94K I ••943.3 28.00\ a CAR O P"Pose� . DR/Yf�yy 24.00 00 28D0 I "'8.30'334111W 83 �� 52.00 `334/ w /49.30 O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT PROPOSED DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A -'- .9r,19 J I' 9018 Xa,0.2r1 I 25 The northerly 50.00 feet,as measured at right angles,of Lot 2, Block 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. PARCEL B Lot 2, Block 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, except the northerly 50.00 feet, as measured at riaht angles, of said Lot 2. WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISON AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY, rno+ //2,0 ^,. OAKWOOD L^1 . 'l.l • MW COC M[\ b aera6.3a•E of s. E) Ii OUTLOT R W 942x25 I , b cI % • T ' 443y9._!547 ID ' 9445-43 1$mo 719f 11_ 10\�t" HEIGHT 2ND ADDITION Y +.n141 z6- ° 14 t �•'1'n'.rR'�,,'U`;h76a-51 �a9• I n-.r•r. .1 �\<n �i,i �1�9t ���a JBL ¢��� � � �!'�r•Y ��� � °� W S[�-� q/rE•ss ° . w!C 0 �� tai �n� L �".vr�s' ` '/e�/ OUTLOT e I p040 4� " t " hb / UE"s U2 / OEROr[9 II= O "PMERAT IOR Ci / O A. DD2Esa MAP p Z. PD z, W 74-I 0, Z. I !�ri�"' EM ■ �tilG • 1�1111� own CzN RIM- calf �t/'� �'�•-'7'' � ���q/ � EXCEPTION (NOT INCLUDED IN PARK) RM A. In Fi I r LM Z. PD z, W 74-I 0, Z. I !�ri�"' EM ■ �tilG • 1�1111� own CzN RIM- calf �t/'� �'�•-'7'' � ���q/ � EXCEPTION (NOT INCLUDED IN PARK) RM • C1 J • Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five VARIANCE/SUNCLIFF DEVELOPMENT COMPANY C. Suncliff Development Company for a Variance from the Sideyard Setback Along a Public Street, Suncliff 1st Addition -- An applica- tion was presented by Suncliff Development Company for a variance from the sideyard setback along public street within Suncliff 1st Addition. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is found on pages 1/4 through /.2 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance application as presented by Suncliff Development Company. • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCES APPLICANT: ADVANCE DEVELOPERS LOCATION: 8 LOTS IN SUN CLIFF 1ST ADDITION, SEC. 29 EXISTING ZONING: R-1 PD DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 5, 1984 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 31, 1984 REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting side yard setbacks on 8 single family lots located in Sun Cliff 1st Addition (see attached list & plan). COMMENTS: Suncliff lst Addition is a small lot subdivision which received Final Plat approval on October 18, 1983. The variances being requested are all on corner lots of interior streets except for Lots 1, Block 3 which is on Beaver Dam Road. is The City Code requires a 30' setback from the R.O.W. of a public street. The applicant is requesting 101_, 7' and 5' variances from that requirement. The reason for the variance request is to accomodate the various house plans onto the corner lots. If the full 30' setback was re- quired it would be very difficult to locate or place structures on these particular lots. This variance request was originally asked for with the overall plan, however, the minutes of July 19, 1983, state that this must be applied for. Attached is a copy of the July 19, 1983 minutes for your review. . If approved, the variances should be subject to the following conditions: 1) All other conditions of the Suncliff P.D. Agreement. 2) All other conditions and ordinances be adhered to. • Greg H. Ingrah m GHI:jbd attachments 116 a 0 List of lots with requested variance: Lot 13, Block,l, Sun Cliff First Addition 10' side yard variance on Timber Wolf Trail Lot 1, Block 2, Sun Cliff First Addition 10' side yard variance on Timber Wolf Trail Lot 13, Block 2, Sun Cliff First Addition 7' side yard variance on Bear Path Trail Lot 1, Block 3, Sun Cliff First Additon 5' side yard variance on Beaver Dam Road Lot 11, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition 10' side yard variance on Sunset Road Lot 25, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition • 10' side yard variance on Sunset Road Lot 26, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition 10' side yard variance on Sunset Road Lot 1, Block 5, Sun Cliff First Addition 10' variance on Sunset Road //7 0 • Council Minutes ' July 19, 1983 171 SON CLIFF - PREL11MURY PLAT The application of Advance Developers, Inc. for preliminary plat approval of Sun Cliff Addition, consisting of approximately 89.1 acres and containing 277 dwelling units was next considered. The Advisory Planning Commission heard the application on July 12, 1983 and recommended denial including those reasons contained in the Advisory Planning Commission minutes. Dave Sellergren was present and indicated that the proposal is to change the use t -� from R-4 to R-1 plus a few duplex units, with a total of 274 units. He statea a meeting had been held with neighboring owners and that all single family homes would now be built on.Beaver Dam Road with the exception of one duplex corner unit. The minimum width would be 60 feet at the building setback line. He further stated that there would be proposals for amendments to the planned development, including the extension of Beaver Dam Road southerly and also, the south area would be proposed to be transformed into a mixed development, including housing, and commercial uses. He further requested that 20 foot setbacks be allowed -on interior lots because the streets would be 60 feet in width, according to staff recommendation. Also, a trail would be eliminated to the pond to the north. Several neighbors were present and generally agreed with the proposal, with no objections. Mr. Sellergren stated that the intent is of the applicant is to rezone'each of the phases as the time of request for final plat approval. Thomas moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the application, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall submit an application for variance for lots and internal streets for setback purposes. 2. The developer shall impose restrictive covenants for for maintenance of the duplexes, rather than the imposition of a requirement for Homeowners Association. 3. Deviation from lot size shall be in accordance with the exibit submitted stating all lot sizes within this development. 4. The 30 footsetbackshall be allowed on Beaver Dam Road. 5. The parkland proposal shall be reviewed by the Park Commission and be subject to their recommendation. 6. The development agreement shall be signed prior to the application of final plat. 7. The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because it abuts a County Road. 8. All other applicable ordinances shall be complied with. • 9. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff. All voted in favor. SEE PLAT FILE //F, I , SUN CLIFF FIRST ADDITION •" � ADOR HOUSEESSES rr%i!r /idlt [....•.. a.. nn r [y.. e.n r.nn+ r� r • /6. 1, lr H•y •w+ [ 'Ok+dle•wil—_-� � i r r I�- �y.- __ As. •A.f ;�, n � r , 4. .y -r f �-•��.i'u--wo--- ntre. n. °. r—=rrr ,p��r 41�' ,wA� • �T • � .;w�.4t �.• 'w • w'rio .')'+ •� ° •�+� • •' ( . 16 \\ • :�eP I: � c' f '��"�' Ta, • 4 !'. � + F, '1•r i+� !y � \�•� .1 L'T n I ya a e r +•i.e i re _ �\ •`j� A l e \ \ � yr � P �\ �.�1.,.r .! .rte• I� w:r may, %, •fss• • .s rn.; rr ![ =1 •r Ile It ,�I `t \ t +�>,r � • �: .y� 't• �;t k nil, � 1M`•�.�. i � �• /� ,w .t,, e, sl.,\. n'c :• a AIN yft sl - r4+0 /-0` � '�.� to �n 1',�� 1 � t•s � f>Imm A �s �.Y ��i 0° .w� n • ,V �wYn .V •+r .fir". lV 'i Lei[ � r = _ t 4/j:, / \\ i y� • ti,� rl�• R ,,% '� .I ppppppw�� Cll MTNDCN D AS SOCIAT(S, INf;• �"'- I v� �Q t C.R.-WINDEN 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. jj�J LAND SURVEYORS Tel {46-394{ 1381 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 66106 For: KEY—LAND HOMES • NOTE: D Denotes Wooden Stake Proposed Garage Floor E1...M.03 (SEB.7) Denotes Proposed Finished Ground E1. Ir' Q —.1 Denotes Direction ft Of Surface Drainage Cb OyP Vertical Datum - N.G.V.D. 1929 J�f 10 / \ iZ6•�9' fore Scale: 1" = 30' oc Zy iy ���; C Denotes Iron •P M, r Monument O / /O / `aQ � 30 O /6.3 yi• / `l b a: BF \d � r q Ty Zy.E //o Lot 13, Block 2, SUN CLIFF FIRST ADDITION, Dakota Coanty, Minnesota. WE MEREST CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVET OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF All BUILDINGS. IF ANY. THEREON, AND All VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND. •Doted this Il th dot, of AF.ri I A D 1954 C. R. WINDEN L ASSOCIATES. INC. lor S,,••vor. M,nn•,ol• toR.,lrol:on No 7 7� /.2-0 CP .7 t < t19 LOT 13, BLOCK SGALE•. I" - 30'—O" 9 N C, • W 0/ 91" For: McKlyn Construction, Inc. • Q Q 3 C. R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS T*L 646.3646 1711 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 66108 S Scale: 1" - 30' \ Ns' 0. NOTE: 6 O G Denotes.Iron Monument ?9•. s Denotes Wooden Stake F (C5 Proposed garage floor E: -e23.3 (800.0) Denotes proposed finishee: ground E1. . me— Denotes direction of surface drainage Vertical Datum - N.G.V.D. 1929 '19/4 v Lot 1, Block 3, :>ULJ CLIFF FIRST ADDITION Dakota County, Minnesota WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE Df SCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF All BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON, AND All VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND •Doled IAu 14 rA day of F " '/1 A D. fV B4 C. R./+ DIN a ASSOCIATES, INC. Uv S�..oYer, M.nnewre Repnvorron No 77?G / 0 62e - > r41� lb o � \ \\� C Q Q ►�'� n) t v V /01 \ O /S / o v�. • i JZ ' LOT I I, BLOCK 4 SCALE = P'= 30'-0" /.23 0 0 • 0 • 0 S�NSF T r So, 4m• r r I r L07 ZS, BLOCK 4 SCALE: I"= 30' - O" 171 -k\N - 0 0 �1�N �33a DO \ H Uo O 10 P. 171 171 LOT Z (,o, BLOCK SCALE: I" =ZO'-O" 12(� m N v n Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -Six • RESOLUTION/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE D. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance for a Resolution Providing for a Concurrent Detachment of Incorporated Land -- At the last regular City Council meeting, the City Planner and City Administra- tor reviewed a parcel of property north of and adjacent to Inter- state 494 that is partly in the City of Mendota Heights and partly in the City of Eagan. There is a request by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance that this property be annexed to provide continuity for development purposes. For further information on this item, refer to a memorandum prepared by the City Planner found on pages /.2 through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the Resolution providing for concurrent detachment and annexation of incorporated land as requested by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company. 1zQ • MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: MAY 31, 1984 SUBJECT: DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY FOR NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE As you may recall at the last City Council meeting, the City Council suggested Staff review to look into the potential and possibilities as to what could be done in order that agreements or transactions could be made for these slivers of property which now are basically detached from Eagan and Mendota Heights by the construction of I-494. In reviewing these small isolated parcels, the recommenda- tion for its request by Northwestern Mutual Life and Northland Mortgage Company is the detachment and annexation procedure which will then transfer these parcels to the City of Mendota Heights. This then would allow for a continuous parcel in which Northland Mortgage is proposing to develop at this time in Mendota Heights. In reviewing .the overall northern boundary of the City of Eagan, it appears that on the east side of the interchange of I-494 and I -35E that the same situation will occur, however, there will be • slivers of Mendota Heights property in the City of Eagan. Hopefully, the same transaction will occur on the easterly side of this inter- change as what is occurring on the west. In review of this, the City is not just giving away property to the City of Mendota Heights but will mutually work out where Mendota Heights will also be giving Eagan some property in the future. Enclosed with this memorandum is a Resolution that the City of Mendota Heights approved on May 15, 1984. Staff has also included a Resolution which the City of Eagan can adopt stating the similar information required for the concurrent detachment and annexation procedures. Once each of the Cities have adopted these Resolutions and if both Cities agree, it is a fairly simple task going through the process of annexation. Also, enclosed is a survey provided by Northwestern Mutual Life showing the parcels which are being annexed by the City of Mendota Heights. If you have any questions or would like additional information regarding this particular. item, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Dale C. Runkle • DCR:jbd Attachments CITY OF EAGAN DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR CONCURRENT DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION OF INCORPORATED LAND WHEREAS, certain contiguous parcels of land falling within the corporate limits of the City of Eagan, at the southern boundary of the City of Mendota Heights, have been separated from the major portion of the City of Eagan as the result of I-494 construction; and WHEREAS, the parcels of land, currently owned by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, are bounded on the north by -the southern boundary of a portion of the Mendota Heights Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the owners of the property and Northland Land Company that the land be acquired by Northland Land Company; and WHEREAS, the property is isolated by the freeway from the majority of Eagan and is a natural extension of both, both abutting the Mendota Heights Industrial Park and the corporate limits of • Mendota Heights; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan that the City Council is desirous of detaching Parcels No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 shown and described on the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Composite Survey attached hereto; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Minnesota Municipal Board is hereby requested to order the concurrent detachment of the des- cribed parcels from the corporate limits of the City of Eagan and its annexation into the corporate limits of the City of Mendota Heights in accordance with the provisions of Minne:;ota Statutes, Section 414.061 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan this 5th day of June, 1984. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN By 130 • CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA • RESOLUTION NO. 84- 30 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR CONCURRENT DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION OF INCORPORATED LAND WHEREAS, certain contiguous parcels of land falling within the corporate limits of the City of Eagan, at the southern boundary of the City of Mendota Heights, have been separated from the major portion of the City of Eagan as the result of I-494 construction; and WHEREAS, the parcels of land, currently owned by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, are bounded on the north by the southern boundary of a portion of the Mendota Heights Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the owners of the property and Northland Land Company that the land be acquired by Northland Land Company; and WHEREAS, the property is isolated by the freeway from the majority of Eagan and is a natural extension of both, both abutting the Mendota Heights Industrial Park and the corporate limits of Mendota Heights; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that the City Council is desirous of annexing Parcels No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 shown and described on the Northwestern Mutual Life is Insurance Company Composite Survey attached hereto; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Minnesota Municipal Board is hereby requested to order the concurrent detachment of the described parcels from the corporate limits of the City of Eagan and its annexation into the cor- porate limits of the City of Mendota Heights in accordance with the pro- visions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 414.061. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of May, 1984. ATTEST: K.Irthleen M. Swanson, City Clerk r�L CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By 44�,,Z l o(trC�^' Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor l3/ �• a u,v .err r1...I a VVn COMPOSITE SURVEY FOR NORTHWESTERN4kUTUAL LIFE • r 4r•u.., �..�r.w�11 F•a s•r•.nr ••.'I•A IACfl / �•�nn.11 VJYfiIIt� ICRC[,. , ... .I INSURANCE CO. If.1l'.: �: •�i�i. is r I . .,•w r .n y V, od.. r� u _wr nil e, v.eatn•1... +�• = � _'_ _ ' ; ,v .YMp � s.rwiw..r Von VF. I .... .•v wlTr^... w�. C I A94 _Lr ys r.•n PINT RSTATE— c �• - •tea. .w ...H � 4 • 'I i�9 I• S + , 1. I I , j • ]SID h ` Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven MUNICIPAL CENTER LANDSCAP A. Municipal Center Landscaping -- Following the referendum for the Municipal Center project, a budget was approved by the City Council in the amount of $10,000 to complete landscaping around the Police Department -Municipal Center complex. With the amount of black dirt required to properly grade the area, the cost for sod, trees, bushes and other landscape material, the budget will not be adequate to complete the project. In addition, an identification sign was proposed on Pilot Knob Road to identify the Municipal Center building which was not budgeted for as a part of the project. The Director of Parks and Recreation was directed to prepare a design for an identifica- tion sign and budget for completing the landscaping at the Municipal Center building. The memorandum and final design work have not been completed, however will be included with the Administrative Agenda packet on Monday. It is important to consider finalization of the landscaping so the work can be completed before the hot months occur in July and August. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the • changes to the Municipal Center landscaping plan. E 133 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight BURNSVILLE/EAGAN CABLE COMMISSION B. Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission -- Periodically, the City Administrator places the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission item on the official agenda to provide an update on the progress being made by Group W in their efforts to fulfill the franchise agreement. The City Administrator will provide a report regarding the time schedule for installation of cable television at the meeting on Tuesday. The Cable Communications Commission has been operating with dollars that were generated from a $10,000 franchising application fee. The Commission is to be funded from revenues collected as a result of a three to five percent franchising fee. Since residents of both communities are not serviced by cable at this time, there is no franchising fee available to the Cable Commission which is the main source of revenue. Group W will advance to the Cable Communications Commission future franchising fees to allow for their operations before cable connections are made. In order to receive an advance on the franchise fees from Group W, both the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan must approve a transfer to the Cable Commission, the Cable Commission will then make a request of Group W and reimburse the two Cities. A formal request has been received from the Joint Commission that each City appropriate $20,000 at this time and an immediate request be made from Group W to advance franchise fees to the Commission in the amount of $40,000 and as soon as those monies are received, both the communities will be fully reimbursed byy the Joint Cable Communications Commission. Enclosed on page /3S is a copy of this request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an appropriation of $20,000 from the City of Eagan to fund the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Communications Commission with the under- standing that the City of Eagan will be fully reimbursed as soon as an advance is received from Group W to the Cable Communica- tions Commission for future franchise fees. 13 54 • E of aagan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 MOIiO1 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER CC MO ms MAY 30, 1984 THOMAS HEDGES ON Ab "Ia EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE Gro Cb k Tan Hedges City Administrator Fagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, Mn. 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: The Burnsville/Eagan Cable Communications Cartnission requests an appro- priation of $20,000.00 from each of the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan to fund the Commission according to its approved 1984 General Budget. Franchise Article II, "Grant of Franchise and Acceptance," section 1, item 2 on p. 7 states: After the initial payment of the acceptance fee, should costs in excess of the acceptance fee be incurred by City prior to the payment of the first Franchise fee, City may charge such excess costs to Grantee and Grantee shall pay then on demand by City, as an advance on the payment of Franchise fees. The Cc mLission appreciates your cooperation. Thank you, Ann C. Bevis, Cable Adninistrator cc. Honorable Chair Jim Smith Treasurer Ron Voracek Finance Director Gene VanOverbeke 13T THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting is Page Twenty -Nine CONTRACT 84-6/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS C. Contract 84-6, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Sealcoating) -- As a part of the approved 1984 budget, $60,000 from the general fund was provided for sealcoating to be matched in a like amount from the major street fund to provide a total of $120,000 for sealcoating during 1984. The following subdivisions are proposed to be sealcoated under Contract 84-6: "Buck Shot" Duckwood Estates St. Francis Woods 1st Addition St. Francis Woods 2nd Addition Drexel Heights Cedar Grove 8th Addition Meadowlands Addition Hilltop Estates Evergreen Acres "Trap Rock" Thomas Lake Road Duckwood Drive Wescott Road (Pilot Knob to Denmark) The estimated cost of this sealcoating program is approximately $118,000. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss • this year's sealcoating program with the Council at the meeting on June 5. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify the plans and specifications for Contract 84-6 (sealcoating) and, if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Monday, July 2, 1984. C� /3 4 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting Page Thirty • CONTRACT 84-14/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS D. Contract 84-14, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place South) -- Under Item A of Public Hearings, the City Council will be considering the installation of utilities to service the Lexington Place 2nd Addition and the Lexington Place South Addition. When the Council received the petition requesting the preparation of the feasibility report, the developer also requested simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specifications while guaranteeing their cost should the project not be approved by Council action at the public hearing. That allowed the staff, through the consultant, to prepare these detailed plans to be presented to the Council on the same night as the public hearing. Therefore, if the public hearing for Project 404 is approved, it would be in order for the Council to consider approving the plans and specifications and authorizing the advertisement for bids. Our consulting engineer will be available to discuss in further detail any question the Council may have. The agreement and easement has been executed for the installation of the sanitary sewer across the west property line of Barry and Marge Tilley to provide the development of this subdivision. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify • the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-14 and if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 29, 1984. n U /37 Agenda Information Memo June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting • Page Thirty -One CONTRACT 84-15/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS E. Contract 84-15, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Sun Cliff 2nd Addition) -- Earlier on the Council agenda, the City Council will be considering Prject 398 for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Sun Cliff 2nd Additions. At the time that the developer submitted the petition requesting the preparation of the feasibility report for that public hearing, they also requested the simultaneous preparation of the detailed plans and specifications while guaranteeing their cost if the project should not be approved by the Council at the public hearing. This allowed the staff, through the consulting engineer, to prepare the plans to be presented for Council consideration on the same night as the public hearing. Our consulting engineer will be available to discuss in detail any questions the Council may have pertaining to this proposed installation of streets and utilities under Contract 84-15. Also, under the Consent Agenda, the Council will be considering the final plat approval for this subdivision which will provide for all the .necessary easements and rights-of-way for this project to commence. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify • detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-15 (Sun Cliff 2nd Addition - streets and utilities) and if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Monday, July 2, 1984. • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 1, 1984 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE Metropolitan Council Chairperson Appointment Mayor Blomquist and the City Administrator have attended two meetings recently where the new Metropolitan Council Chairperson, Sandra Gardebring, was the guest speaker. Those meetings were the Municipal Legislative Commission meeting held Wednesday, May 23, in Plymouth, and the Association of Metropolitan Municipali- ties Banquet held in Brooklyn Park on the evening of Wednesday, May 30. Mayor Blomquist made notes of Ms. Gardebring's speech at the AMM banquet outlining specifically her objectives as the new Metropolitan Council Chairperson. Those objectives are as follows: 1) The Governor's objective to study and possible fund a light rail transit (LRT) somewhere in the metropolitan area. The new chairperson has indicated that this study will be a priority item for the Metropolitan Council. • 2) The creation of a rapid transit board (RTB) which will act as a managing arm of the mass transit commission is also a strong objective of the Metropolitan Council. Because of opt -out and other related legislation that affect a centralized busing effort, it is becoming necessary to create a long range planning arm of the mass transit commission allowing the RTB to involve itself with planning and overall objectives of a mass transit operation and keep the MTC as a operating arm for bus service. Ms. Gardebring is asking for cities to volunteer persons for appointments to the RTB. 3) Solid waste landfill abatement is another priority. 4) The combined sewer overflow (CSO) which mainly affects the two core cities is another priority and concern of the Metropolitan Council. This item would be very expensive and must be carefully weighed. 5) Regional channels for cable television is another effort and priority that the Metropolitan Council will be considering. Two other items of interest and seem to be a priority of the new chairperson are long-term housing efforts for the elderly and other social programs for the elderly since the population • shift has rapidly increased the percentage of elderly in the metropolitan area. Her main summary statement at both presentations /3 y Informative Memo • June 1, 1984 Page Two was the Metropolitan Council will "act as a planning and coordinat- ing body". These statements were emphasized and seemed to be well received by all municipalities. League of Minnesota Cities Presidency Each year a member of the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities is selected to be president and another member as vice-president. The vice-president normally moves into the presidency the following year. This year Iry Anderson, of Interna- tional Falls, is president, while Adrian Herps, a city councilmember in Bloomington, is vice-president. Mr. Herps has decided, for business reasons, not to pursue the presidency next year. Since the presidency is rotated between metro and out state, it would be appropriate to select someone on the Board of Directors from the metropolitan area to be nominated for the League presidency. Mary Anderson, the Mayor of Golden Valley and former chairperson of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, is seeking the presidency and has received significant support from suburban communities. Mayor Blomquist is suggesting that the City of Eagan support Mary Anderson for the presidency. She is very sympathetic to local government aids and many of the issues • that are confronting the City of Eagan as well as other suburban communities. More than likely, she will not be opposed and if she is, it would probably be generated from a League Board member in one of the two core cities. Final Cost Analysis of the Minnesota Jockey Club For a Class A Horse Racing Facility The City Administrator has concluded the final processing of all bills involving the Minnesota Jockey Club's application that was processed by the City of Eagan for a Class A horse racing facility. All the bills were reviewed and a letter drafted to Steve Pflaum with copies of those bills attached to finalize a reimbursement for all expenses incurred by the City of Eagan. As an informative item, the City Administrator has prepared a brief memorandum to the City Council outlining the final cost analysis. A copy is enclosed on page _LSL� Any member of the City Council would like more detail on any of these costs, copies of the bills and more detailed information as prepared by the City Administrator can be made available. use of Dakota County Western Court Facility as Precinct Polling Place The Finance Director/City Clerk has received some resistance from the judges regarding the use of the Western Court Facility • located on Cliff Road as a precinct polling place. The City Administrator has sent a letter to the County Administrator • Informative Memo June 1, 1984 Page 3 copies enclosed for your reference on page /1/-6 , and also has met with staff members of Dakota County to review the issue. Because of the autonomy of the judges, it is very difficult for the County Board to intervene and require that the judges make the facility available. The City Administrator will be visiting with Judge Hoey to explain how the voting will impact their operations and is hopeful that this matter can be worked out by June 13, which is the deadline for any change in precincts as required by the Secretary of State's office. If any member of the City Council has contact with any of the judges and would promote the need and use of one of the courtrooms for polling location, it would be most helpful. Yankee Square Inn A letter was received from Yankee Square Inn regarding a provision that the City of Eagan in time of a disaster can use their airport shuttle bus. A copy of this letter is enclosed on page MASAC • Enclosed on pages / ?' through / ,!rO are copies of minutes of the last MASAC meeting held on April 24. Minnesota Symphony Orchestra Enclosed on page /6'1 is official notification that the Minnesota Symphony Orchestra will be performing at the Minnesota Zoo on Saturday, July 14. Roadside Fruit Stands and Sale Stand At the request of the City Council, the City Attorney has prepared a memorandum regarding roadside fruit stands and sale stands. A copy is enclosed on pages /$Y through /53 Tires Plus Standard The City has sent a letter to the owner of Tires Plus Standard siting their violations on two different occasions. The second letter,- which was sent from the Chief Building Official, is enclosed on page /$11- for your review. Fire Department Monthly Reports Enclosed on pages /6S through 164 are monthly reports for the volunteer Fire Department which represent January and February, 1984. • Rodney Schaumburg Enclosed is a copy of a letter addressed to the Mayor and Council from Rodney Schaumburg concerning the Pilot Knob Road improvements % T� Informative Memo June 1, 1984 • Page 4 and also a response letter from the Director of Public Works to Mr. Schaumburg regarding that item. These letters are enclosed on pages /.57 through /19 Footing Inspection at Woodthrush Court At the recent special City Council meeting, a concern was raised regarding the footings that were poured at 3664 Woodthrush Court and a response from the Chief Building Inspector is enclosed for your review on page /60 Bloomington Platin A concern was also raised at the same special City Council meeting regarding a business that was relocated from Bloomington to Eagan called "Bloomington Plating". Concerns regarding that building are addressed in a memorandum attached on pages /G/ through /63 Entitlement Issuer/ID Bonds Enclosed on pages 1411- through /66 is a copy of a letter and the certification that was sent to the State of Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development regarding Eagan's • request to become an entitlement issuer for industrial development bonds. The City Administrator has contacted the State and learned that the $26,000,000 issue for the Minnesota Jockey Club horse racing track will qualify as an issue. This means that the City of Eagan will be able to utilize three of the top four years, which are 1980, 1981 and 1983, and the average entitlement of each year is in excess of $15,000,000. This means that Eagan could have available some $15,000,000 of industrial revenue bonds to issue for industrial expansion. Most suburban communities, with the possible exception of Bloomington, are looking at an average of about $2-$3,000,000. The issuance of these bonds, though never used by the Minnesota Jockey Club, could be a real bonanza for the City in the next couple of years. Can -American Conditions At the last regular City Council meeting a request was made to provide a copy of all the conditions that were approved for the Can -American project. Those conditions are listed as a part of the May 15 City Council meeting minutes. Policy For Rescue Squad Calls City. Councilmember Thomas has received inquiries from members of the volunteer Fire Department regarding the new policy that was implementea by the Fire and Police Departments- for 'rescue • squad calls. A meeting was held on May 7 between City Council - member Thomas, Chief of Police Berthe, Fire Chief Childers and Informative Memo • June 1, 1984 Page 5 the City Administrator to discuss those concerns. A memorandum was prepared by the City Administrator, a copy is enclosed on pages 147 through /6of" outlining the concerns that were discussed at that meeting. As a result, the two Chiefs were asked to address those questions and issues and a follow-up meeting was held on Tuesday, May 22, at which time the issues were further discussed and a consensus reached that the new policy would continue for one (1) year as an experiment and be evaluated again at that time. City Administrator • E /d i E • 1] MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MAY 31, 1984 SUBJECT: FINAL COST ANALYSIS OF THE MINNESOTA JOCKEY CLUB'S APPLICATION FOR A CLASS A HORSE RACING FACILITY The City of Eagan incurred a number of expenses while processing the Class A horse racing facility application that was presented by the Minnesota Jockey Club. For a general review of those expenses, the following analysis is provided: During 1983, there were engineering expenses incurred totalling $828.50 paid to the Firm of Bonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik, an appraisal fee in the amount of $800.00 for J.E. Parranto Associates, Inc., and legal services to Dave Kennedy in the amount of $2,174.50. There were also legal services paid to Paul Hauge in the amount of $2,230.92 and a reimbursement of City staff time and miscellaneous costs, primarily hours recorded by the City Administrator totalling $5,172.87. Therefore, the total cost reimbursement to the City of Eagan was $11,206.79 for 1983. The costs incurred during 1984 totalled $18,446.46. The cost breakdown for 1984 is as follows: 1. Legal services for Paul Hauge in the amount of $1,331.08. 2. Evensen-Dodge, Inc., for services rendered in the review of the tax increment financing issue in the amount of $12,448.75 and for time allocated and recorded by the City Administrator in the amount of $4,193.75. Therefore, the total expenses incurred by the City and requisitioned for reimbursement by the Minnesota Jockey Club is $17,973.58. 3. Engineering services provided by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik .8 Associates amounted to $472.88. (Previously invoiced and paid.) There were also other expenses incurred by Dave Kennedy and Steve Rosholt during 1984 that were directly billed to the Minnesota Jockey Club and, therefore, are not shown as a request for payment by the City of Eagan. In summary, the total costs incurred by the City of Eagan for staff and consulting services was $29,653.25. All other consulting services and time incurred for the project was a direct obligation of the Minnesota Jockey Club. The time involvement of other City staff was `ori in comparison to other development appli- cations(' \— Y.,.11A City Administrator TLH/jj cc: Gene Van Overbeke, Director of Finance/City Clerk /11C OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. RO. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454.8100 MAY 17, 1984 MR FRED JOY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR DAKOTA COUNTY DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1560 HIGHWAY 55 HASTINGS MN 55033 Dear Fred: BEA BLOMOUIST Mow THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER 0aax+,non�3 THOMAS HEDGES ON Aa Rota EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE ON 0&1 The City of Eagan, through City Clerk Gene VanOverbeke, has made - some informal inquiries concerning the use of the Dakota County Western Court -Facility as a precinct polling place for elections conducted by the City. It is my understanding that Jeff Connell of your staff reviewed the matter with certain County officials and responded that it would be best for the City to not use this facility. It has been the opinion of City of Eagan officials that the use of this facility will allow for the most efficient precints within the City and benefit all concerned parties. It is also the opinion of City officials that the use of one courtroom two to three times per year maximum would not necessarily be disruptive to the normal activities at that location. With advance notice, scheduling should not be a problem. Therefore, please consider this letter to be the City's formal request for use of this facility as provided by M.S.A. 204B.16, Subd. 6, which clearly says that any statutory city, county, school district, etc., shall make their facilities, including parking, available for the holding of city, county, state and federal elections. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We will be happy to provide whatever additional information you desire relative to this request. The City Council is expected to formalize precinct boundaries at its June 5, 1984, meeting and we would very much appreciate a response from your office prior to that time. S, rely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/jj THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY i 11-5 0 YANKEE SQUARE INN 3450 Washington Drive • Eagan. Minnesota 55122 • (012) 452-0100 17J May 17,1984 Honorable Mayor Blomquist Members of City Council City of Eagan P.D. Box 21-199 Eagan Minnesota 55122 Gentlemen, The staff and managment of the Yankee Square Inn, .'is pleased to announce the start of our airport shuttle service. Guests of the Yankee Square Inn will have access to the Eagan business community as well. This service is part of our policy to better serve our Eagan business community, as well as our guests convenience. We are proud to serve the Eagan community, and feel a strong obligation to serve the city that serves us. We at the Yankee Square Inn, would like to offer our shuttle bus to the City of Eagan in the event of an emergency or disaster. The shuttle service is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. It is our sincere hope that such a situation never arises,'but should it become necessary to call on us please don't hesitate to call. If you have any questions or suggestions, as to our service please call me. Si ely, I Timothy B. Dunn General Manager 0 /546 MINUTES METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING 7:30 P.M. April 24, 1984 Minneapolis, Minnesota Call to Order, Roll Call. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Walter Rockenstein at 7:30 p.m. The Secretary was asked to call the roll and the following members were in attendance: Gary White (A) Ben Griggs (R) Robert Johnson (R) Ron Glaub (R) Jeff Hamiel (R) Art Tomes (A) David Woodrow (R) John Richter (R) Walter Rockenstein (R) Jim Serrin (R), Roylene Champeaux (R) Dennis Schulstad (A) Kris Clinton (A) Steve Cramer (A) Scott Bunin (R) Carl Vangsness (R) Joyce Maddox (R) Eugene Bohmert (A) Lloyd Wickstrom (A) Martin Kirsch (R) Donald Priebe (R) Larry Shaughnessy (R) Tom Baker (R) Midway Airlines Northwest Airlines Republic Airlines Minnesota Business Aircraft Association Metropolitan Airports Commission Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce St. Paul Chamber of Commerce City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of St. Paul City of St. Paul City of St. Paul City of St. Paul City of St. Paul City of Richfield City of Richfield City of Mendota Heights City of Eagan 147 • • MASAC Minutes Advisors • John Aamot Nancy Witta Darrell Weslander Joan Vandersloot Visitors Dave Kelso Captain John Lindstrom Colonel Jerry Litschke Captain Dennis Lord Jim Aswegan J. K. Nelson Chauncey Case -2- April 24, 1984 1. Federal Aviation Administration Metropolitan Airports Commission Technical Advisor Secretary Minnesota Pollution Delta Air Lines Army National Guard Army National Guard MN DOT Bloomington Metropolitan Council 2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting of March 27, 1984• Control Agency The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections to the minutes of March 27, 1984. There being none, the minutes were approved as presented. 3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications. • Darrell Weslander presented copies of the articles to be placed in two (2) editions of the Highland Villager and the West Side -West St. Paul Voice regarding the temporary -relocation of the Army National Guard helicopter unit from St'. Paul Downtown Airport to Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport. Chairman Rockenstein introduced Captain John Lindstrom, Chief Pilot, from Delta Air Lines. Captain Lindstrom expressed his personal delight at introducing service to Minneapolis/St. Paul. Delta will fly six (6) trips per day; three (3) from Atlanta and three (3) from Chicago on B727 -equipment. He assured the council that Delta's fleet meets all current noise abatement standards. 4. Technical Advisor's Preferential ilization Reoort and Complaint The reports for the month of March were presented by Darrell Weslander. John Richter asked Jeff Hamiel about projected operations for the next five (5) years. Jeff Hamiel stated that MAC Chairman, Ray Glumack, would like to address MASAC at a future meeting to elaborate on this and related issues. Larry Shaughnessy questioned the take -off methods on runways I1L and 11R. John Aamot of the FAA explained the departure procedure, the separation require- ments involved and the reasons discrepancies may occur. •5• Persons Wishing to Address the Council. There were none. /a Y MASAC Minutes -3- April 24, 1984 0 VA I E Presentation Army National Guard Personnel. Colonel Jerry Litschke presented a brief summary regarding the temporary use of • the facilities at Wold Chamberlain by the Army National Guard helicopter unit. He explained that no training would be conducted at MSP, and that the river corridor route had been coordinated with the tower. The expected date of return to St. Paul is sometime in November or December of this year. Report of Legislative Committee. Larry Shaughnessy reported on the April 12 meeting of the Legislative Committee, and presented Resolution 84-3 in support of the petition to cease the manufacture and registration of aircraft which do not meet Stage 3 noise standards after January 1, 1986. It was moved by Larry Shaughnessy, seconded by Scott Bunin, that the resolution be adopted. The motion passed unanimously. Update: Status of Legislation Regarding Noise Abatement. House File 1945 and Senate File 1914 regardingairport noise abatement authored by Representative Wesley Skoglund was discussed by Jeff Hamiel. While in the Senate, language of the bill was changed; however, Representative Skoglund has thus far not introduced it to the House. It is uncertain whether it will be voted upon during this legislative session. Summary of MAC Staff Meeting with Concerned Citizens in Burnsville. Darrell Weslander briefly described the meeting he and Jeff Hami8l had in Burnsville on April 11 regarding the experimental use of the 180 turn after departure on runway 22, and its affect on the area residents. • Also mentioned was Burnsville's interest in MASAC and its desire to be represented. Report of MASAC Representative to MAC Meeting of April 16, 1984, The summary of the Commission meeting of April 16 was presented by Jeff Hamiel. Items of interest were as follows: - the approval of the lease to Burlington Northern to relocate the Western hangar to the new cargo area adjacent to Republic, - House Bill 1945 (as discussed in item 8. of these minutes), - REIL lights at Anoka/Blaine, - ILS at Airlake, and - the EIS petition regarding Anoka/Blaine as a minor role airport. Other Items Not on the Agenda. • Darrell Weslander explained an upcoming sample study utilizing handicapped individuals to count aircraft operations on the various runways. /SW MASAC Minutes -4- April 24, 1984 12. Establish Next Meeting Date. • The next meeting date was established as May 22, 1984, and an invitation to attend will be extended to Mr. Larry McCabe. 13. Adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at 9:12 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Joan Vandersloot MASAC Secretary \J • 160 0 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: MAY 18, 1984 RE: FIRST ANNOUNCEMENT MINNESOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA - MINNESOTA ZOO For some time now this department, in cooperation with the communities of Lake- ville and Apple Valley, has been working with the Minnesota Zoo and the Minn- esota Symphony Orchestra in promoting a "free admission" concert at the Minn- esota Zoo. Just recently, we have been able to conclude an agreement and would like to • make you aware of this first announcement that the Minnesota Orchestra will be playing at the Minnesota Zoo on Saturday, July 14, in a free concert for residents south of the Minnesota River. This promises to be an exciting and awesome adventure and certainly a unique event for the residents of our communities. Please mark July 14 on your social calendars as I am sure it will be an event you will want to participate in. Additional information concerning the activ- ities to be promoted as well as the involvement of the Council and Commission will be forthcoming as details are worked out in the next week or two. KV/js lel HAIIGE, SMITH, EIDE & IIELLER, P.A. • ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 9800 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN. MINNESOTA 00122 PAUL H. 14AUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER May 7, 1984 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Roadside Fruit Stands and Sales Stand Dear Tom: AREA COOK 612 TZ"PHONZ 404.4224 I was asked by Mayor Blomquist to explore some questions relating to the location and.expansion of fruit stands along public streets and also questions about vendors of murals, tools, etc., who sell their products either on public street right-of-way or private property adjacent to right- of-way. • 1. Is it permissible for a fruit and vegetable stand that has been located on private property adjacent to a public street to continue to operate and can it expand its operation without a City permit? • Under Eagan City Code Section 11.10, Subd. 3, the continued use, expansion or rebuilding of any use existing upon the date of adoption of the City Code is allowable. However, this is not interpreted to permit an initial develop- ment in accordance with any repealed ordinance. The expansion or rebuilding relates only to existing buildings or uses and also the expansion cannot be so large as to constitute an initial development. Eagan Ordinance Section 11.10, Subd. 3(C) requires a permit for expansion of a nonconforming use but it's only applicable if the use was not preexisting or grandfathered. It would have to be determined whether the fruit and vegetable stand was in existence prior to adoption of the ordinance dealing with non- conforming uses and if not it could not expand without acquiring a -nonconforming use permit. If a vendor is within the public right-of-way or is on public land he or she must have a permit and follow the terms of the permit. /5v Mr. Hedges • May 7, 1984 Page -Two Another area that can be looked at in relation to these kinds of stands is whether there is any public nuisance created such as excessive traffic, safety problems, etc. This .may be grounds for controlling such stands even though they may have been in existence for a long period of time. 2. Can vendors sell murals, tools, etc. without a license or permit on private property or public street right-of-way? Eagan City Code does not prohibit these sales under its solicitations section. See Section The sale of products on residential property may be violative of the Zoning Ordinance which requires it to be residential. If a vendor offers to sell property within street righ-of-way, he or she would be violating Eagan Ordinance 7.05, Subd. 1, which states as follows: "It is a misdemeanor for any person to place, deposit, display or offer for sale, any fence, goods, or other obstructions upon, over, across, or under any street without first having obtained a written permit from the Council, and then only in compliance in all respects with all terms and conditions of such permit, and taking precautionary measures for the protection of the public." In addition, zoning provision Section 11.10, Subd. 9, forbids structures in • public rights-of-way. It states: "No building, structures, or uses may be located in or on any public lands or right-of-way without approval of the Council." Uses could be interpreted to include sales of goods. It appears that if a vendor is within the public right of way or is on public lands, he or she must have a permit and-mugt follow the terms of such permit. skk Very PhelP H. Hauge V City Attorney - City of Eagan 15,3 • W a 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO, BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 0.54-8100 May 11, 1984 MR TOM GEGAX T.H.A. MARKETING CONCEPTS 3760 WAYZATA BLVD GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55416 RE: CITY OF EAGAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TIRES PLUS STANDARD Dear Mr. Gegax: BEA SLOM9UIST �Aca THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH 'ERRY THOMAS THEODORE V.ACHIER =a+�cr eromoa+� -OMAS HEDGES C:ro Arse zrwc EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Please be advised' that it has been brought -to the attention of the City that you have remodeled the Tires Plus Standard Service Station without the appropriate building permit. The Building Inspection Department has penalized you with the appropriate fee for failure to obtain the permit prior to commencement of construction. It has also been brought to our attention that during the remodeling process you eliminated one of your restroom facilities, leaving only one facility in the structure. It would appear that this is a violation of the Uniform Building Code requiring two (2) such facilities where an employer employs more than. four (4) people and includes employees of both sex. The UBC by reference is a portion of the Eagan City Code. Therefore, you are in violation of the City Code. It is the City's position that the Conditional Use Permit is implicitly conditioned upon remaining in compliance with the existing code. Therefore, you are required to correct the violation prior to renewal of your Conditional Use Permit or accept the possibility of non -renewal by the City Council. Sincerely, Dale--Pe`tefrson Chief Building Official CC: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Dale Runkle, City Planner Parcel File THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF January 1984 WORK PERFORMED • TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 720 Training 484 Truck 6 Equipment Maintenance 131 Station Maintenance 143 Fire Prevention 25 Administrative 253 TOTAL 1756 MANPOWER STATION U1 STATION 02 STATION 03 Available Days 12 5 6 Available Nights 12 "jam— �— Available Rotating 2 4 �"— On Leave 1 —T— TOTAL 27 23 16 FIRE/RESCUE • . TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS Structure 12 $10,000 Grass 0 Vehicle 4 1,700 False 3 Medical _ 5 Other 1. TOTAL 28 $11,700 LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS 1-9-84 Cedarvale Parking Lot Car. $ 700 1-9-84 4279 Lodgepole Car 1,000 1-4-84 4158 Rahn Rd 015 Apartment 1,000 1-1-84 2030 Emerald House 6,000 Revised 1-1-83 /5S • • EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF February 1984 WORK PERFORMED $ LOSS TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 740 Training 342 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 131 Station Maintenance 129 Fire Prevention 42 Administrative 375 TOTAL 1759 MANPOWER Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating On Leave TOTAL • FIRE/RESCUE TYPE Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other TOTAL LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME 2-7-84 2-18-84 • STATION 91 12 12 2 1 27 NUMBER 12 0 2 •4 2 1 21 LOCATION 3890 Lexington 4591 Greenleaf Dr., /S6 STATION 02 STATION 03 5 6 13 �^ 4 — 1 23 16 $ LOSS $7,400 $7,400 OCCUPANCY $ LOSS House $6,000 House 2,000 Revised 1-1-83 May 24, 1984 /O-0/000- 030 MUNICIPAL OFFICES 3795 Pilot Knob Road Fagan, Minnesota 55122 Attention: Mayor Bea Blomquist and Fagan City Councilmen Dear Mayor Blomquist: I attended a City Council Meeting on or around July 5, 1983, regarding assessment on the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road (County laud #31). I complained to the City for not obtaining an easement for upgrading the road, storm sewers, etc. I was told to submit a letter within ten (10) days of my complaints, which I did. Not receiving any response to my letter I called City Hall around the 1st of the year. After several phone calls I received some response from the City that there would be an adjust- ment on the storm sewer and nothing more on the other complaints. I was then advised the easement for the road was a County problem. I talked to Dakota County and they said it was a City of Eagan responsibility to obtain an easement. In the past I have written the City with no response, leaving me with the feeling these matters are riot being properly reviewed. I am requesting a letter from the City of Fagan within thirty (30) days as to why they can trespass on private property and upgrade a road without obtaining an ease- • ment. Also,'I never received an itemized assessment statement from the City on the upgrading of Pilot Knob. I would appreciate your attention in this matter as soon as possible. RLS/blw cc: Mr. Fred Joy COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1560 West Highway 55 Hastings, Minnesota 55033 Sincerely, 4- L. Schaumburg 3160 Pilot Knob Rcad Eagan, Minnesota 55121 /S% • of ecag a 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 0.54$100 May 30, 1984 Mr. Rodney L. Schaumburg 3160 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: PARCEL #10-01000-030-32 PROJECT #200, PILOT KNOB ROAD UPGRADING Dear Mr. Schaumburg: f7/ BEA BLOMTDUIST Mp THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Cw ,MB , THOMAS HEDGES EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Gro coy Your registered letter to the Mayor and City Council dated May 24th has been forwarded to my attention for review and response. In your letter, you indicate that you have contacted the City but have never received a response leaving you with the feeling that matters are not being properly reviewed. Maybe the documentation in this letter, to your attention, will again remind you of the review per- formed by the City and the action taken or decisions made in regards to your complaints. In your most recent letter, you indicate that you have not received an itemized assessment statement from the City for the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. Enclosed please find two copies of the "Statement of Special Assessment" for Project #177 which dealt with the installation of storm sewer and Project #200 which related directly to the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road and of surfacing. These statements were sent out to all property owners who were assessed under these projects informing them of the amount of the assessment. As you will note, it delineates a pay schedule with interest rates and deadlines, etc. In addition, you will note that subsequent to your complaint submitted at the assessment hearing of July 5, 1983, that the amount of the assessment levied on your property's tax statement, due and payable in 1984, did not contain the $495.00 for the storm sewer laterial assessment. This was a direct result of an investigation of your complaint and a determination made that your property did not receive the benefit which was originally pro- posed to be levied at the assessment hearing on July 5, 1983. You also indicate that you talked with "Dakota County" regarding the easement problem and you were informed that it was the City of Eagan's responsibility to obtain the easement. It is difficult THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY /S9, RODNEY L. SCHAUMBURG MAY 30, 1984 PAGE 2 to believe that the County would inform you that it was the City's responsibility to obtain the easements when it was their legal de- partment who acquired all easements necessary to initiate County Contract 31-05 (Pilot Knob Road). The City had to reimburse the County a certain portion for the right-of-way acquisition costs that were incurred by the County. Therefore, as you can see, it was the full County responsibility to acquire all necessary ease- ments. As you have been informed in the past by several different agencies, the County determined that it already had legal right to the existing 33 foot half right-of-way which you do not agree with. Whether you agree with it or not, it has been determined by the County Attorney's Office that that property was in fact County right-of-way and no additional acquisition was necessary. As you can see, there has been considerable response to your numerous and continuous complaints to both the County and the City regarding this project. It appears the problem is not in receiving a response from the City or the County; but rather, receiving the response that you want to hear. • Therefore, I feel that the City and County have properly responded to your concerns and in the City's instance has taken appropriate corrective action where necessary. Unless any new concerns are brought forth that have not been previously discussed, I will con- • sider the information contained in this letter to be the final response from the City of Eagan. Sincerely, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC:jbd Enclosure cc: The Mayor and City_Council -c/o Thomas V. -Hedges, City Administrator,.- • /59 0 MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: MAY 30, 1984 RE: FOOTINGS AT 3664 WOODTHRUSH CT On a footing inspection, the inspector only sees the form work and soil conditions. The form work shows the inspector the building setbacks and building elevations. The foundation inspection shows the inspector if the foot- ing/foundation assembly is compatible. On this foundation inspection, it was found that the bearing wall assemblies were good, but the partition curb block • areas of the • stairwell were out of place and they will be repaired when the basement floor is poured. The structuralintegrity will not be compromised at all. DP/js CC: Parcel File 140 C: MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: MAY 30, 1984 RE: RICK BODEKER D/B/A BLOOMINGTON PLATING L 15, B 2, EAGANDALE #4 3330 MIKE COLLINS DR The above referenced company moved into the referred building sometime in March. We were unaware of their arrival, or the nature of their business until we were in receipt of their industrial sewer connection application on April 30 as indic- ated on the copy of the enclosed application which we for- warded at that time to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commis- sion. Their permit #0178 was assessed 30 SAC units by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Gould Battery and E&Q Fabricators were the original tenants and they accounted for • five (5) of the SAC units. They were deducted from the 30 that were assessed. I have referred the use of the parcel for review to City Planner, Dale Runkle, and the possibility of the sanitary discharge being detrimental to the City Sewer System to Public Works Director, Tom Colbert. If you need further information, please contact me and I will attempt to gather it for you. DP/js Encl. CC: Tom Colbert, Public Works Director Dale Runkle, City Planner Parcel File • 0 E. INDUSTRIAL: SEWER CONNECTION APPLICATION Company name t. L) rh 33k 1) Mob �: I,,"1-7 ;' /v 225x3 Location seeress - - Mailing address Company Representative Title JC, -x'. /, . Phone number ry 7 - CfZ Iq 1. Nature of business'�rt�a'I'1= ^�"`( l:' 1': i4r ` (" MWCC-7361 (Sn ❑ New building 2. Projected date for facility start up 1.1 Gr'I 1_ `I 3. Total facility area / ? G I~ c sp. ft. 4. No. of employees 5. Operating hours per day fix Operating days per year \❑/Building addition ® Existing building 7. Water supply. D a. Municipal water supply L LCy gal/day b. Well water supply gal/day c. Other (specify) gal/day d. Total water supply �000 gal/day 8. Waste discharge: a. Sanitary waste discharge 120 gal/day b. Uncontaminated cooling water discharge gal/day 1.) .... to sanitary sewer sal/day . 2.) .... to storm sewer sal/day ylJ, /� c. Industrial waste discharge r • r cgal/day d. Total discharge to sanitarysewer (Sa+gbl+gc) 1 i1y0c gal/day 9. SAC units: Total discharge (l30) 274 - 00 SAC Units /. 0- •�- 1 6 10. SAC Charge:1 DO 000 00 J�r1Q SAC Units (9) 30 X Unit s J~00 Charge rya=,2 s0I4 S SAC Charge � 7t" 11. Pretreatment: [Refer to Sections 5-5 and 5-6 of the Waste Control Rules andRegulations.) Does the Company plan any in -plant treatment of wastes? !ECL L[(`EA yes. describe 2015! 315' A �'(',TC_)A TPG Ric,inr (I�t T-t[ft.ivle 12. Sampling 6 Flow Measuring: [Refer to Section 5.9 of the • Waste Control Rules and Regulations.] Indicate location of sewer access Ani i alAP� point and describe flowmeter and means of sampling fT 'MTSt, ff)-ti F),r) ) {z(, Ru `rcbT P,.j T -L P.uA'IC H MicTriof) SANIP►,Ir1� �_i�OL)QI.�( G.PFl3 �ArIF1''S T!`•f=W61•t^�T ilii lti1CPCIsJC, �Y; Ile I. 13. Discharge Quality. 3,0 elk i/4 - C..30 m(DI- 0,0e ^GI&. /IZMI./L Resent Absent (Check appropriate tax) Constlhum .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... I......... .................... .......... V ..........Solids .......... Organics .......... Acids .......... Caustics .......... Temperature (greater than 150'F) .......... Cadmium .......... Chromium ......... Copper .......... Cyanide ..........Iron ..........Lead .......... Mercury .......... Nickel ......... Zinc .......... Phenols Grease and/or oil .......... Solvents Radioactive wastes ✓ V ] P.......... - MWCC-7717 ' 14. Additional Information. sketches or descriptions may be attached for the purpose of adequately describing the waste discharge. !!{{�'�� C CATION This is to certify that Ba oc; f yi �i� t^S� N 1 a agrees to comply with the rules (Co -mw Nuna) and regulations governing connection to and use of the Metropolitan Disposal System. including obtaining an Indus. trial discharge permit prior to th Compan�Signature of of ficial) Date 2) Trai 3) Approved by Metro Titan W s Control Com ission W 4zr-, % % ii�, Signature Title ��foY Date��S/s-f do 1` d► -7g /,.3 K,)ierJ s/3/H • �,ut • 5�31$0- OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 May 22, 1989 MR RICHARD NADEAU FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION MN DEPT OF ENERGY 8 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 150 E KELLOGG BLVD ROOM 900 ST PAUL MN 55101 Re: Certification For Entitlement Is Bonds City of Eagan Minnesota Dear Mr. Nadeau: of Industrial BEA SLON01=1 MOM THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Ca l Ma.nncs THOMAS HEDGES 01y A�ftclo EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE G4 Cy Enclosed is the City of Eagan's Certification to become an entitle- ment issuer of industrial development bonds in the State of Minnesota. The City of Eagan has chosen the program to become an entitlement issuer which is one alternative available under the allocation process adopted this year by the Minnesota Legisla- ture. The attached list of issues represent the bond transactions that were either publicly sold or privately placed. There are many other industrial development bond applications that received public hearings before the City Council and either have preliminary or final approval by the City of Eagan, however, official bonds were never issued. Those applications are not represented as a part of Certification and "the City of Eagan believes this is consistent with the intent of the Legislature. If other communities are including issues that are pending that were never officially issued, then the City of Eagan should be allowed to add those applications to its list for purposes of determining the entitlement amount. Thank you for your consideration regarding the Certification by to contact this office at any time. and if there are any questions the City of Eagan, feel free Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/jj cc: Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance; Paul Hauge, City Attorney THE LONE OAT( TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Ernie Clark, Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. CERTIFICATION • Pursuant to Minn. Laws 1984, ch. 582 15 to be codified as Minn. Stat. 474.18, subd. 2, the undersigned certify that City of (name of local issuer as de intd by Minn. Ea 5� (hereinafter the Laws 194 ch. 5H 3 tai' o becoo ified as Minn. Stat. 474.16, subd. 2) local issuer) issued obligations of a type subject to limitation under the terms Section 721 of the Tax Reform Bill of 1984, H.R. 4170, as reported by the Ways and Means Committee of the United States House of Representatives on March 5, 1984 (hereinafter "obligations") listed herein for each of the four preceeding calendar years. For each of the four preceeding calendar years list the total principal amount of obligations issued by any issuer within the geogra- phic boundaries covered by the local issuer. (For example, bonds issued by port authorities or redevelopment authorities operating within the geographic boundaries of the local issuer should be included in these totals) 1980 $11,678,000 • 1981 1,350,000 1982 1,250,000 1983 34,336,000 For each obligation issued by the local issuer, each of the four preceeding calendar years, list the following information: Description of Total Local Issuer Project with Date of Principal if other than Respect to which Issuance of Amount of Local Issuer the Obligation 1980 Obligation Obligation Listed above was issued 1981 1982 See Attached 1983 (Attach additional pages if necessary) The following authorized official is designated for contact by the Department of Energy and Economic Development: Name Thomas L Hedges Address 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 May 21, 1984 nate yOr May 21, 1984 Data A nay or Loca ssuer • 3/24/83 $3,325,000 9/17/83 111001000 10/1/83 1,815,000 None Unitog Rental Services - Rental laundry facility None Greaser Inc., - Office and Total Local Issuer Theodore A. Davies - Office Date of Principal if other than Description of Project With Issuance of Amount of Local Issuer Respect to which the Obligation Obligation Listed Above Obligation was Issued 5/9/80 $2,130,000 None Rosemount, Inc. - Office ' and manufacturing facility 7/15/80 848,000 None Elliott Auto Supply Co. - O£fice and warehouse facility 8/1/80 700,000 None DCR Company - Bowling alley expansion 12/19/80 5,500,000 None Economics Laboratory - Addn. to research and development facility 12/30/80 2,500,000 None Carson Pirie Scott Co. - 1980 Subtotal $11,678,000 Warehouse and showroom 3/5/81 $950,000 None Yankee Square Office I - Office Building - 9/28/81 400,000 None John Henry Foster Co. - 1981 Subtotal $1,350,000 Office and warehouse facility 8/25/82 $1,250,000 None Yankee Square Office III - Office Building •'��'' 1982 Subtotal $1,250,000 3/24/83 $3,325,000 9/17/83 111001000 10/1/83 1,815,000 12/14/83 1,391,000 12/30/83 705,000 12/30/83 20,000,000 12/30/83 6,000,000 1983 Subtotal 34,336,000 Grand Total $48,614,000 None Yankee Square Inn - Hotel None Hillcrest Development - Office building None Unitog Rental Services - Rental laundry facility None Greaser Inc., - Office and warehouse facility None Theodore A. Davies - Office and warehouse facility None Minnesota Jockey Club - Horse racing track and re- lated facilities None Minnesota Jockey Club - Horse racing track and related facilities 4.6 MEMO TO: CITY COUNCILMEMBER JERRY THOMAS, CHIEF OF POLICE JAY BERTHE, FIRE CHIEF BOB CHILDERS • FROM: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE: MAY 7, 1984 SUBJECT: MEETING TO DISCUSS NEW POLICY FOR RESCUE SQUAD CALLS A meeting was held on Monday, May 7, 1984, at Perkins Restaurant to discuss a new procedure that was initiated by the Police and Fire Departments regarding the type of calls that the Fire Department's rescue squad is called by the Police Department. Until December 31, 1983, the rescue squad would be called on most all accidents and medicals totalling some 350 during 1983. A study was made by Administration in both Departments and it was determined that many of the calls that were responded to by the rescue squad the Police were able to handle on a first response. It was determined by the Administration in both Depart- ments that the rescue squad response was not necessary and therefore would be limited to those emergencies where the dispatcher and/or police officer decide the rescue squad is necessary. City Councilmember Thomas, who asked for the meeting with City, Police and Fire Administration, stated that volunteers from the Fire Department are concerned that both medicals and accidents have occurred since January of 1984 when the rescue squad was • not called and more than likely should have been called by the police dispatchers. Councilmember Thomas provided several instances which included the following: 1. A January accident at T.H.13 and Cedar where cars were flipped due to an accident and victims were in need of backboards. There was no rescue squad called. 2. An accident in the general vicinity of Wescott and Pilot Knob in approximately February or March and there was no rescue called. 3. A concern was expressed regarding an infant who stopped breathing as to why three squads were taken off the street to respond to that problem when possibly one squad could have adequately handled the emergency. Other examples were cited and City Councilmember Thomas further explained that the rescue squad had provided a quick response in the past, has provided good public relations throughout the community and given people a security that an emergency team is available to help police assist in a first response to a medical or accident. He further expressed concern about a liability to the City if the rescue squad is not called when they could have been available for an accident or medical. Both Chief Berthe and Chief Childers stated that they, would • review the specific instances that were raised by City Councilmember Thomas as well as in detail the new procedure. Chief Childers • MEMO MAY 7, 1984 PAGE 2 stated that to date after four months in 1984 the rescue squad has been called nine times. The City Administrator asked that the Fire Department review the 350 calls last year to determine how many of those calls could have been eliminated in comparison to the policy that is in effect in 1984. Fire Chief Childers stated that he is concerned about having enough volunteer fire- fighters to man all three stations and if the same personnel are called out on 300-400 rescue calls, this could jeopardize the availability of manpower for operating all three stations. He also expressed a concern that the firefighters do not have enough emergency services training .if the rescue squad is going to be properly manned and respond to more calls. Fire Chief Childers also expressed a concern about adding more volunteers to the Department, especially station number one. He explained that this station has had a dramatic change in available volunteers due to a recent retirement of several firefighters. Both Police Chief Berthe and Fire Chief Childers stated that they would review in detail the procedure and provide some addition- al information on how this procedure is working in relationship to the concerns that were raised by City Councilmember Thomas and also specifically address the various incidents that were reported by City Councilmember Thomas. It was suggested by the City Administrator that a follow-up meeting be held to review the findings of both Chief Berthe and Chief Childers. (-\ \ " , '�' L ,') City Administratou► TLH/jj U 0 /691 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 19, 1984 EAGAN CITY HALL CITY ATTORNEY 1. Odell vs. City of Eagan 2. McCarthy Easements CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the "Engineering/Special Assessment Divisions" i 2. Capital Equipment Acquisition 3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins Addition l6q MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 18, 1984 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA The following items are to be considered as a part of the Adminis- trative Agenda: CITY ATTORNEY 1. ODELL VS. CITY OF EAGAN- As the City Council recalls the Minnesota Court of Appeals has overruled the Trial Court in the case of Odell vs. City of Eagan finding that the City Council did not have a valid basis for denying the preliminary plat. The appellant court accurately points out that the denial must be based upon sufficient reasons relative to the City Ordinance. In the case of the Odell Lots, the only apparent conflict with the Ordinance was in regard to the garage which exists within set -back requirements. The Court of Appeals has found that the garage was a non -conforming structure as distin- guished from a non -conforming use. In their opinion, the sub- division ordinance only addressed non -conforming uses unless, the garage was not a valid basis for denial. Therefore, the City Attorney is recommending that a resolution from the copies enclosed on pages 1'7.+ through _1 -7,5 -be considered based on the recent decision of the Court of Appeals. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To prove or deny the en- closed resolution. Expenses were incurred in the amount of $394.20 for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and $1528.51 for witnesses and other related expenses incurred by the appellants. The total cost for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals case was $1922.71. The Odells' requested that the City consider total payment, however, through negotiations and a dispute from the City Attorneys office on payment of those expenses the total amount has been lowered to $639.20. A motion is in order to consider payment in the amount of $394.20 to the State of Minnesota for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and to the Odell's in the amount of $245.00 with both payments totaling $639.20. /70 Administrative Agenda Information June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Two 2. McCarthy Easements The City Attorney, Director of Public Works and City Administrator are making efforts to gain a desirable settlements for various easements that are required for utility work through the McCarthy property. In an effort to negotiate a reduction of approximately $20,000 in interest costs, the City Attorney is planning to proceed with the first day of trial and will report to the City Council following the City Council tomorrow evening on the final status of the City as it relates to our negotiations with McCarthy's attorney. For a review of the easements which were discussed by City Attorney Hauge with Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmembers Smith and Wachter on Sunday evening, refer to pages 17 (. through 177 . Apparently, City Councilmember Thomas was unavailable as is City Councilmember Egan who is on vacation. CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1. Personnel Continuation of Internsh ecial Assessment Division" Within the As a part of the 1984 budget, an engineering intern was authorized for up to six months. Since this engineering intern is a civil engineer and has been assisting with engineering tech work and special assessments and due to the increased construction and activity within engineering, it is desirable to continue the internship for the remainder of 1984. The City Administrator has discussed the position with the Director of Public Works and feels the need is justified and is recommending consideration by the City Council. The City Administrator also asked the Direc for of Public Works to address the overall personnel needs in engineering/special assessments, realizing that these needs will be further addressed at the time of the 1985 budget development. The Director of Public Works has prepared a memorandum describing the intern needs at the present time and also the possibility of more permanent employment in the future. Enclosed on pages 1716 through 1190 is a copy of the memo as prepared by the Director of Public Works. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider approval or denial of an internship program in the engineering department for an additional six (6) months during calendar year 1984. 171 Administrative Agenda Information June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Three 2. Capital Equipment Acquisition As a part of the 1984 budget, a one ton dump truck with plow and sander and a 32,000 GVW dump truck with plow were given review, however final consideration was to be given during calendar year 1984 with the sale of equipment certificates. The Director of Public Works has requested that these two (2) vehicles be purchased during 1984 as explained in a memorandum enclosed on pages III through Ig2. . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an authorization for advertising for bids to consider the purchase of a four wheel drive one ton dump truck and a 34,000 GVW dump truck with front wing plow attachments with final approval and authorization of equipment certificates at the time the bid is awarded. Special Note: For additional information on this item, refer to page 48 of your 1984 budget. 3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters A license application was received from the Eagan Hockey Boosters for a combination gambling license to be used as a part of the July 4 festivities. Enclosed is a copy of a letter from a repre- sentative of the Eagan Hockey Boosters and the gambling license application. The organization is requesting a waiver of the license fee which is $25.00 and the $10,000 bond requirement. It is the tradition of the City Council that the bond requirement be waived, however, the license fee be collected to offset any administrative charges. P.i83 —111- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a combination gambling license as requested by the Eagan Hockey Boosters. r-7.1, Administrative Agenda Information June.19,.1984 City Council Meeting_ Page Four DIRECTOR OF'PUBLIC WORKS 1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins Addition The Robins Addition is located south of I-494 and west of T.H. 149 (old Dodd Road) incorporating east Blue Gentian Road. This prelimi- nary plat received approval from the Council in November of 1981 and has received two previous extensions which expire on June 15, 1984. They have requested a third extension to June 15, 1985, due to the fact that they have not yet completed the technical process associated with trading rights-of-way and property with MnDOT as a part of the progression of I-494. It is anticipated that all formal documents and agreements would be completed within the next 6 - 9 months which would allow them to proceed with their final plat prior to June of 1985. Due to the fact that this is the third request for an extension, the staff would recommend that it be the final extension and that the developers be so informed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third and final extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Robins Addition with the final expiration date of June 15, 1985. 1-73 RESOLUTION EAGAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE _, 1984 WHEREAS, an application was submitted by David and Patricia Odell in August of 1982 for a preliminary plat to split Lot 2, in McCarthy Ridge Addition into two single family lots exceeding the minimum size requirements for single family lots; and WHEREAS, in August and again on October 5, 1982, the Eagan City Council denied said application; and WHEREAS, the applicants, David and Patricia Odell, appealed to the Minnesota Court of Appeals from the Dakota County District Court's Order and Judgment finding in favor of the City of Eagan; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Court of Appeals determined in its decision filed May 8, 1984 that the Dakota County District Court should issue an Order directing the City Council to grant the applicants a preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the Dakota County District Court by an Order dated May 24, 1984 directed the City Council to grant approval of the appellants' preliminary plat of Odell Addition as submitted without further delay or appearance by the Odells; NOW THEREFORE, upon motion duly made �y by , it was RESOLVED as follows: and seconded 1. That the Eagan City Council be and hereby is on record approving the preliminary plat application of Odell Addition, subject to the following conditions: a. Park dedication requirements for the new lot shall be met by cash donation of the standard single family lot amount of $420.00. b. The preliminary plat shall be subject to Minnesota Department of Transportation's review and comment because the plat abuts State rights-of-way. C. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff. d. The applicant shall be required to provide sewer and water service to the. newly -created lot. e. Additional per lot trunk area assessments should be paid for the additional lot at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval for trunk area sanitary sewer and water area assessments as a condition of this plat approval. f. This development shall accept its financial responsibility for trunk area storm sewer assessments for one additional lot in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. g. Developer shall comply with all applicable City Code provisions. Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAGAN BY: 1-75- 2 Its: City Clerk HAucE, SB=. EIDE & FELLER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 9808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY FAGAN. MINNESOTA 89122 PAUL H. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID D. KELLER June 18, 1984 Mr. Arnold Rempe Attorney at Law One Signal Hills Nest St. Paul, MN 55118 RE: Eagan - McCarthy Property Easements Dear Arnold: ARG COOL 812 T[LIPMONI 484-4224 On Sunday, June 17, 1984, we discussed proposed terms for the settlement of various easements from the McCarthy family running to the City of Eagan covering both the north 80 acre parcel lying generally north of Wescott Road and the south 70 acres south of Wescott Road. These terms gene rally.are as follows: 1. McCarthys will grant a pond easement for Hurley Lake at an 830 elevation, according to the legal description. 2. An easement for storm sewer utility purposes over the North 20 feet running westerly of Hurley Lake will also be granted. Temporarily a gravel access shall be used by the City over such easement for mainten- ance access to the storm sewer lift station. At such time as the property in the vicinity of Hurley Lake is developed, the City will remove the gravel service road and relocate the maintenance access to the lift station. 3. The City will relinquish the acquisition of the westerly arm of the Hurley Lake and quit claim that area to the McCarthys. 4. McCarthys will grant an easement for the northeasterly ponds within the south 70 acre parcel at approximately 830 elevation. 5. An easement will be granted for sanitary sewer trunk purposes across the south 70 acres as described by legal description in the condemnation action now in process. 6. A further easement for storm sewer trunk purposes lying parallel and within the 20 foot permanent sanitary sewer trunk easement, together with necessary temporary construction easement for trunk storm sewer and trunk sanitary sewer through approximately June 30, 1985 will be conveyed. 1-76 Arnold Kempe June 18, 1984 Page 2 7. An easement will be granted generally according to a sketch submitted to you on Friday, June 15, 1984, running from the Patrick Eagan Park Lake on the south, northerly to connect with the proposed storm sewer trunk consisting of a 20 foot wide permanent and necessary temporary construc- tion easement. 8. The water trunk easement appeal generally covering the north 80 acres will be dismissed by the McCarthys. It is understood that no other easements have formally been levied but that there are pending trunk area storm sewer assessments and that the McCarthys will not pursue appeals of those easements, although no committment by the McCarthys is made at the present time. 9. The City will pay the McCarthys $165,000.00 plus interest at the rate of 11% per annum computed since September 1981 at which time the City gained access for trunk storm sewer construction purposes on the north 80 acre property. All interest accrued on deposits made by the City with the Dakota County Clerk of District Court will be credited toward such interest. 10. The condemnation file 092213 covering Hurley Lake will be continued until a formal agreement is entered amongst the parties and upon execution of the agreement, that condemnation action will be dismissed as well as the sanitary sewer trunk condemnation file 096510. PHH:ras Very truly yours, HAUGE, SMITH, EIDE &.KELLER, P.A. Paul H. Hauge ' 177 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 19, 1984 EAGAN CITY HALL CITY ATTORNEY 1. Odell vs. City of Eagan 2. McCarthy Easements CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the "Engineering/Special Assessment Divisions" 2. Capital Equipment Acquisition 3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins Addition 16q MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 18, 1984 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA The following items are to be considered as a part of the Adminis- trative Agenda: CITY ATTORNEY 1. ODELL VS. CITY OF EAGAN- As the City Council recalls the Minnesota Court of Appeals has overruled the Trial Court in the case of Odell vs. City of Eagan finding that the City Council did not have a valid basis for denying the preliminary plat. The appellant court accurately points out that the denial must be based upon sufficient reasons relative to the City Ordinance. In the case of the Odell Lots, the only apparent conflict with the Ordinance was in regard to the garage which exists within set -back requirements. The Court of Appeals has found that the garage was a non -conforming structure as distin- guished from a non -conforming use. In their opinion, the sub- division ordinance only addressed non -conforming uses unless, the garage was not a valid basis for denial. Therefore, the City Attorney is recommending that a resolution from the copies enclosed on pages )7,+ through _175- be considered based on the recent decision of the Court of Appeals. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To prove or deny the en- closed resolution. Expenses were incurred in the amount of $394.20 for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and $1528.51 for witnesses and other related expenses incurred by the appellants. The total cost for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals case was $1922.71. The Odells' requested that the City consider total payment, however, through negotiations and a dispute from the City Attorneys office on payment of those expenses the total amount has been lowered to $639.20. A motion is in order to consider payment in the amount of $394.20 to the State of Minnesota for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and to the Odell's in the amount of $245.00 with both payments totaling $639.20. !-7o Administrative Agenda Information June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Two 2. McCarthy Easements The City Attorney, Director of Public Works and City Administrator are making efforts to gain a desirable settlements for various easements that are required for utility work through the McCarthy property. In an effort to negotiate a reduction of approximately $20,000 in interest costs, the City Attorney is planning to proceed with the first day of trial and will report to the City Council following the City Council tomorrow evening on the final status of the City as it relates to our negotiations with McCarthy's attorney. For a review of the easements which were discussed by City Attorney Hauge with Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmembers Smith and Wachter on Sunday evening, refer to pages 17 (� through 17'7_. Apparently, City Councilmember Thomas was unavailable as is City Councilmember Egan who is on vacation. ADMINISTRATOR 1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the "Engineering Special Assessment Division" As a part of the 1984 budget, an engineering intern was authorized for up to six months. Since this engineering intern is a civil engineer and has been assisting with engineering tech work and special assessments and due to the increased construction and activity within engineering, it is desirable to continue the internship for the remainder of 1984. The City Administrator has discussed the position with the Director of Public Works and feels the need is justified and is recommending consideration by the City Council. The City Administrator also asked the Direc for of Public Works to address the overall personnel needs in engineering/special assessments, realizing that these needs will be further addressed at the time of the 1985 budget development. The Director of Public Works has prepared a memorandum describing the intern needs at the present time and also the possibility of more permanent employment in the future. Enclosed on pages 1716 through 1130 is a copy of the memo as prepared by the Director of Public Works. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider approval or denial of an internship program in the engineering department for an additional six (6) months during calendar year 1984. 171 Administrative Agenda Information June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Three 2. Capital Equipment Acquisition As a part of the 1984 budget, a one ton dump truck with plow and sander and a 32,000 GVW dump truck with plow were given review, however final consideration was to be given during calendar year 1984 with the sale of equipment certificates. The Director of Public Works has requested that these two (2) vehicles be purchased during 1984 as explained in a memorandum enclosed on pages /,il through A-1-- ACTION -2. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an authorization for advertising for bids to consider the purchase of a four wheel drive one ton dump truck and a 34,000 GVW dump truck with front wing plow attachments with final approval and authorization of equipment certificates at the time the bid is awarded. Special Note: For additional information on this item, refer to page 48 of your 1984 budget. 3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters A license application was received from the Eagan Hockey Boosters for a combination gambling license to be used as a part of the July 4 festivities. Enclosed is a copy of a letter from a repre- sentative of the Eagan Hockey Boosters and the gambling license application. The organization is requesting a waiver. of the license fee which is $25.00 and the $10,000 bond requirement. It is the tradition of the City Council that the bond requirement be waived, however, the license fee be collected to offset any administrative charges. 0.193 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a combination gambling license as requested by the Eagan Hockey Boosters. Administrative Agenda Information June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting Page Four DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins Addition The Robins Addition is located south of I-494 and west of T.H. 149 (old Dodd Road) incorporating east Blue Gentian Road. This prelimi- nary plat received approval from the Council in November of 1981 and has received two previous extensions which expire on June 15, 1984. They have requested a third extension to June 15, 1985, due to the fact that they have not yet completed the technical process associated with trading rights-of-way and property with MnDOT as a part of the progression of I-494. It is anticipated that all formal documents and agreements would be completed within the next 6 - 9 months which would allow them to proceed with their final plat prior to June of 1985. Due to the fact that this is the third request for an extension, the staff would recommend that it be the final extension and that the developers be so informed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third and final extension of the preliminary plat approval for the Robins Addition with the final expiration date of June 15, 1985. i-73 fr ✓�` LESOLUTION EAGAN CITY COUNCIL JUNE _, 1984 WHEREAS, an application was submitted by David and Patricia Odell in August of 1982 for a preliminary plat to split Lot 2, in McCarthy Ridge Addition into two single family lots exceeding the minimum size requirements for single family lots; and WHEREAS, in August and again on October 5, 1982, the Eagan City Council denied said application; and WHEREAS, the applicants, David and Patricia Odell, appealed to the Minnesota Court of Appeals from the Dakota County District Court's Order and Judgment finding in favor of the City of Eagan; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Court of Appeals determined in its decision filed May 8, 1984 that the Dakota County District Court should issue an Order directing the City Council to grant the applicants a preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the Dakota County District Court by an Order dated May 24, 1984 directed the City Council to grant approval of the appellants' preliminary plat of Odell Addition as submitted without further delay or appearance by the Odells; MA NOW THEREFORE, upon motion duly made �y . it was RESOLVED as follows: and seconded 1. That the Eagan City Council be and hereby is on record approving the preliminary plat application of Odell Addition,. subject to the following conditions: a. Park dedication requirements for the new lot shall be met by cash donation of the standard single family lot amount of $420.00. b. The preliminary plat shall be subject to Minnesota Department of Transportation's review and comment because the plat abuts State rights-of-way. C. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff. d. The applicant shall be required to provide sewer and water service to the.newly-created lot. e. Additional per lot trunk area assessments should be paid for the additional lot at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval for trunk area sanitary sewer and water area assessments as a condition of this plat approval. f. This development shall accept its financial responsibility for trunk area storm sewer assessments for one additional lot in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. g. Developer shall ,comply with all applicable City Code provisions. Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAOAN BY: 175' 2 Its: City Clerk HAUGE, SMITH. EIDE & HELLER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 9808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN. MINNESOTA 88122 PAUL M. HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIOE DAVID O. KELLER Mr. Arnold Rempe Attorney at Law One Signal Hills Hest St. Paul, MN 55118 HE: Eagan - McCarthy Property Easements Dear Arnold: June 18, 1984 ARRA COD[ 012 T[LIJHON[ 4x4.4224 On Sunday, June 17, 1984, we discussed proposed terms for the settlement of various easements from the McCarthy family running to the City of Eagan covering both the north 80 acre parcel lying generally north of Wescott Road and the south 70 acres south of Wescott Road. These terms generally are as follows: 1. McCarthys will grant a pond easement for Hurley Lake at an 830 elevation, according to the legal description. 2. An easement for storm sewer utility purposes over the North 20 feet running westerly of Hurley Lake will also be granted. Temporarily a gravel access shall be used by the City over such easement for mainten- ance access to the storm sewer lift station. At such time as the property in the vicinity of -Hurley Lake is developed, the City will remove the gravel service road and relocate the maintenance access to the lift station. 3. The City will relinquish the acquisition of the westerly arm of the Hurley Lake and quit claim that area to the McCarthys. 4. McCarthys will grant an easement for the northeasterly ponds within the south 70 acre parcel at approximately 830 elevation. 5. An easement will be granted for sanitary sewer trunk purposes across the south 70 acres as described by legal description in the condemnation action now in process. 6. A further easement for storm sewer trunk purposes lying parallel and within the 20 foot permanent sanitary sewer trunk easement, together with necessary temporary construction easement for trunk storm sewer and trunk sanitary sewer through approximately June 30, 1985 will be conveyed. Arnold Rempe June 18, 1984 Page 2 7. An easement will be granted generally according to a sketch submitted to you on Friday, June 15, 1984, running from the Patrick Eagan Park Lake on the south, northerly to connect with the proposed storm sewer trunk consisting of a 20 foot wide permanent and necessary temporary construc- tion easement. 8. The water trunk easement appeal generally covering the north 80 acres will be dismissed by the McCarthys. It is understood that no other easements have formally been levied but that there are pending trunk area storm sewer assessments and that the McCarthys will not pursue appeals of those easements, although no committment by the McCarthys is made at the present time. 9. The City will pay the McCarthys $165,000.00 plus interest at the rate of 11% per annum computed since September 1981 at which time the City gained access for trunk storm sewer construction purposes on the north 80 acre property. All interest accrued on deposits made by the City with the Dakota County Clerk of District Court will be credited toward such interest. 10. The condemnation file 092213 covering Hurley Lake will be continued until a formal agreement is entered amongst the parties and upon execution of the agreement, that condemnation action will be dismissed as well as the sanitary sewer trunk condemnation file 096510. PHH:ras Very truly yours, HAUGE, SMITH, EIDE & KELLER, P.A. Paul H. Hauge 177 MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JUNE 15, 1984 SUBJECT: PERSONNEL NEEDS - ENGINEERING/SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIVISIONS As the City continues to grow so does the demand for services of the Public Works Department through its Engineering and Special Assessment Divisions. I have recently analyzed our workload requirements and our available personnel in the Special Assessment Division and have determined that there currently is a greater workload than can be handled by the existing 1.5 employees. Not only does the Special Assessment Division tabulate, spread, certify and keep track of all final assessments associated with public improvement contracts, but they are constantly requested to provide information pertaining to past, present and pending assessments everytime the ownership of a parcel changes. As an example, every building permit issued through the Building Inspection Department (which appears to be record setting each year) requires a special assessment search and history on that particular parcel by the builder, realtor or property owner. In addition to these, every subdivision or lot split of an existing parcel that either occurs at the County without our knowledge or is processed through the City through our platting procedures, require a subdivision of the records pertaining to assessments along with a special assessment search as requested by the existing and new property owners. While both of these items are associated with growth and development of property, there is also the resale of existing property that requires the same amount of research in response to those requests. In 1983, approximately 1,500 special assessment searches had to be performed. The 1983 Annual Report can provide further documentation to the work-related statistics associated with this Division. Assuming that the City's growth will no longer continue, present manpower is necessary to maintain the records and provide the information for the parcels currently existing within the City. Assuming a fairly steady rate of growth with the projected comple- tion of the interstate and available land to be developed, addi- tional personnel is required to insure that this future development occurs in an orderly manner to protect the City's financial interests associated with the public improvements necessary to accommodate this growth. One of the most important steps in the development process is the final plat application. It is at this point that the City performs considerable research to determine outstanding past and future assessment obligations. In addition, it is when legal descriptions, street names, addresses, utility/ponding easements, and City files and records are created which become the permanent basis for the City's information system. Presently, this final MEMO TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR JUNE 15, 1984 PAGE TWO plat process has been performed by the Public Works Director with limited assistance being available from the Engineering and Special Assessment Divisions. Subsequently, this process is not being followed through with the degree of accuracy that is necessary to protect the financial integrity of the City's operations along with eliminating corrective work by other City personnel at a later date which is time consuming and..inefficient based on our work loads and time available. The Engineering Division currently consists of the Assistant City Engineer and two engineering technicians. One technician handles all the administrative functions associated with street lights, subdivision financial guarantees, as -built files, drainage com- plaint investigations, etc. The other technician performs the technical field work associated with inspections, surveying, pond elevations, drafting, quantity calculations, etc. With the Assistant City Engineer being responsible for 15-20 private developments within the City, grading permits applications, review of new subdivision applications and related technical plans, etc., the miscellaneous map updating, easement record keeping, general assistance for research projects, etc. is presentlybeing performed by a temporary intern position authorized with the 1984 budget which expires July 1. With the sealcoating program expand- ing each year, street striping, traffic counts, greater accuracy in easement acquisition/recording, inspection of in-house developed contracts, the Engineering Division will be severely short staffed if this intern position is terminated on July 1. Therefore, I would like to request serious consideration of authorizing the continuation of this intern program through the completion of 1984 so that a more detailed analysis can be performed for justification of requesting a full-time engineering technician position as a part of the 1985 budget process. The continuation: of this intern position and the hopeful evolution into a full-time, permanent technician position would provide considerable assistance to both the Engineering and the Special Assessment Divisions in the final plat process and all related documentation requirements. Please take into consideration the fact that a considerable amount time spent by this intern has been charged to City contracts which will be reimbursed through the 278 overhead portion of the special assessments. Therefore, I am confident that a continuation of this position through the comple- tion of 1984 will not create a financial burden to the general budget and will greatly increase the Public Works Department's ability to provide the level of service that is being demanded by the growing public in Eagan. While I realize that this memo appears to be excessive in length, I assure you its brevity is a shortcoming to an adequate explanation 179 MEMO TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR JUNE 15, 1984 PAGE THREE of the level of service and detail associated with the work require- ments currently being encountered by the Public Works Department and certainly to be expanded as the City continues to grow. Therefore, please inform me if we can receive the authorization to continue this intern position through 1984 so that I can inform the individual involved. Any additional information that may be necessary will be gladly and promptly forwarded to your attention as requested. Respectfully submitted, � jS�1���C!'t>� homas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/kf cc: Rich Hefti, Assistant City Engineer Ann Goers, Special Assessment Clerk !80 MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: JUNE 15, 1984 SUBJECT: CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION - PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE - REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLES #101 & #113 As a part of the 1984 budget, I submitted to the City Council for consideration a request to replace two existing vehicles in the Public Work Street Maintenance Division. These vehicles are identified as follows: VEHICLE #101. This is a 1976 Ford 1/2 ton pickup truck which presently has 94,000 miles on it. Because of its limited weight capacity, this vehicle is used primarily for manpower transportation and parts running. Except for our larger pieces of equipment (graders, dump trucks, etc.), this is the oldest vehicle in the Public Works Maintenance Division. Due to its mileage, age and body condition, limited repairs have been performed and this vehicle has been relegated to nominal usage. VEHICLE #113. This vehicle is i 1972 International Harvester 34,000 G.V.W. dump truck. This 12 year old vehicle has 95,700 miles with a deteriorating body. It is the oldest maintenance vehicle in our fleet and is quickly deteriorating through the heavy use that it receives in our gravel road and snow removal maintenance programs. Similar to vehicle #112, which was re- placed in 1983, this vehicle is starting to experience substan- tial repair work at inopportune times (snow plowing) which restricts its dependability and reliability for emergency snow removal services. In recommending the replacement for these vehicles, the Superinten- dent of Streets and myself have taken into consideration the maximum flexibility of various vehicles and the overall needs of the Maintenance Division. Based on our review, we concur with our previous request to receive authorization to purchase the following vehicles: REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLE #101. This replacement is proposed to be a small 4 wheel drive one ton dump truck with plow and sander to augment our cul-de-sac snow removal fleet and provide additional ice control with another sanding unit. This vehicle would be identical to the two vehicles purchase in 1983 for our cul-de-sac snow removal fleet. Last winter's record snow falls proved these vehicles to be well worth the investment and greatly increased our cul-de-sac snow removal efficiency as compared to previous vehicles. In addition, their ability to perform sanding for effective ice control proved their MEMO TO THOMAS L. HEDGES JUNE 15, 1984 PAGE 2. flexibility to be a valuable piece of equipment. The estimated cost of this vehicle with the plow and sander is approximately $19,500. An estimated $500 trade in for existing vehicle #101 has been taken into consideration in the estimated cost. REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLE #113. This replacement vehicle would be of like kind to vehicle #113. It would be a 34,000 G.V.W. dump truck complete with front and wing plow attachments. This would be the similar specifications for the vehicle that was approved for acquisition in 1983. This vehicle is large enough to handle our mainline snow plowing and ice control needs and yet small enough to provide maximum flexibility for year round seasonal use such as street patching with our new tailgate paver, gravel road maintenance, etc. The estimated cost of this vehicle with related plow attachments is'approxi- mately $53,000. This takes into consideration a $3,000 trade in for existing vehicle #113. As the Council may recall, with winter's heavy snow accumulation and poor condition of our older. pieces of equipment, there were times when 408 of our snow removal fleet was unavailable, inactive or under repair. In addition, with last year's replacement vehicles being ordered in the end of July, we have yet to receive our large dump truck due .to the lead time required to manufacture these specialized pieces of equipment. Therefore, I would like to strongly urge the City Council to give serious consideration to approving this request so that advertise- ment for bids can be initiated as soon as possible to try and insure that these new vehicles would be available for our snow removal program of 1984 - 85. I would be happy to review any of the vehicles with yourself or the City Council, at your convenience, to discuss in further detail our reasons and justifications for requesting replacement at this time. Please let me know if any additional information is necessary for consideration of this item by the City Council at their meeting on June 19, 1984. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert TAC:jbd CC: Bill Branch, Superintendent of Streets/Equipment 19�, NEWSLETTER FAGAM Hockey Boosters, Inc. Volume: Number: Date: -jL,..2 Q 1C I � �� 7011M #OCKFY FOR FAGAM AND SUR R OUMD/NG COMM MI FS& c;Ty 43� �-C'� C, 6 M 010 O i 4.Cb-y $o 4S E/LS IS 3 I Fee: Annual: Event Only CITY OF EAGAN BINGO AND/OR GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION Date Submitted: APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST 30 DAYS PRIOR TO EVENT. Type of License(s) requested: Bingo Paddlewheel Tipboard Raffle X cam" kr_f -t s-+ Name of Organization: � c, a � ..r v} , eke., do,.cTaier I, and I 40n4a.- zation Name of Designated Bingo and/( Gambling Manager, /o -1 - q5 (first, middle, last) Manager -Date of Birth Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct the game(s) indicated above in accordance with the provisions of the City of Eagan's Ordinance No. 70 and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349. Authorized OfficePr of Organization ...Designated Bingo and/or Gambling Manager of Organizatic A. The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer of the organization: ��// 1 1. TRUE NAME: ^oT �L,., ��, w �l�A L F_0 v4vLS Last First FullMiddle 2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: ,ck -3 a� Street City St a zip 3. DATE OF BIRTH: / c // 4. PLACE OF BIRTH: N i&.,v MOnth,Da ,Year City,Sta vs?tf. S. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No_ If yes, explain B. The following is to be completed by the designated bingo and/or gambling manager of the organization: 1. TRUE NAME: E/2�Zx 40,✓ D A-c.t- dF6aZ,•%0A_77'f Last First FullMiddle 2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: 39(40 �LLMVLE 6)"AAJ YN1pj Street City State zip 3. DATE OF BIRTH: (o aG Y7)_4. PLACE OF BIRTH: WiZLjN/}�t Month,Day,Year City,S—tate 5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No If yes, explain 6. How long have you been a member of the organization?_ 7. Are you gambling manager for any other organization? �O 8. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action designating you bingo and/or gambling manager. I`G9' GAME INFORMATION: 1. �p Plac[,(e where games will be/�played' �a. }� „i Sc `-.00 L r q K k l C( / I 1 �CnN fpS1 bJG 0.4 -Q9=1N �1�NN S-3 /Q Street Cit State Zip 2. Are premises owned or leased by sponsoring organization? 3. Date or dates games will be played Date and/or da (s) of week 4. Hours of the day games will be played:From_LL__A.M. to P.M. —A. M. tofI_P.M. 5. Maximum number of players V000 6. Number and value of prizes to be awarded ORGANIZATION INFORMATION: 1. Address where regular meetings are held I3$r/ bf0paKk Street City 2. Day and time of meetings -i.. [ s 7 3 o ,0 ,.. — hyT cA h., I b� 3. Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota? Yes x No 4. How long has the organization been in existence? 12 5. How many members in the organization? b 6. � What is the pLLu��rpose of the organization? 1'ac v,•CQp ax r k. 7. -E ul c=3_on- 7 X YOfficers�ofwthe Organization: NAME ADDRESS (street,city,zirl / TITLE 8 wive names or officers or any other persons paid for services to the organization: NAME ADDRESS (3treet,city, ziFl TITLE 9. In whose custody will organization records be kept? n NAME ADDRESS .a ).$4 It j'/ c1 street,city,state,zip SS7� Business Telephone Number `( SS / O Home Telephone Number jqs' 10. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate the players in the event any injury is sustained by played while participating in the bingo and/or gambling game, or while on the licensed premises, please state the: -' NAME OF INSURER Dy aHl I( POLICY NO 11. Have you (Manager and Officer) read, and do you thoroughly under- stand the provisions of all lacus, ordinance, and regulations governing the operation of bingo and/or gambling games?' 12. Attach a list of aIll active members of the organization. I declare that the information I have provided on this application is truth- ful, and I authorize the City of Eagan to investigate the information sub- mitted. Also, I have received from the City of Eagan a copy of the City Ordinance No. 70 relating to bingo and/or gambling, d I have familiarized myself with the contents and requirements therof. y ) n==,., S, K1c �, N jLk , Signature of authorize o ficer of the organizat — Dace I Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this day of Signature of Notary Public Commission expires on Signature of designated bingo and/or gambling manager of organization. Date Subscribed and sworn to me a notary public on -this day of Signature of Notary Public Commission expires on