06/05/1984 - City Council RegularPLEASE PRINT
Date: June S, L91*
NAME
J; W1
�p,e L N�PrrfG�'�
`V-�,
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK
PLEASE SIGN HERE
37so So. l e,e we Tart
z�- SDs
•
C
•
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY HALL
JUNE 5, 1984
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL 6 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA S APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
A. Fire Department
B. Police Department
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
C. Park S Recreation Department
D. Public Works Department
p.v A. Contractor Licenses
5 B. Personnel Items
G C. Contract 83-13, Final Payment/Acceptance (Park Ridge
Addition, et' al)
�.(o D. Contract 83-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Treatment Plant
Utilities)
E. Contract 84-8, Approve Williams Pipeline Encroachment
1 Agreement
g F. National Flag Day
p.JOG. Resignation of Douglas McNeely/Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission Member
Pp.11 -H. Contract 83-5, Approve Change order 01 (Water Treatment
Plant - Utilities and Streets)
F.171- I. Contract 83-5, Change Order o2 (Water Treatment Plant -
Streets and Utilities)
j3 J. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order
Public Hearing (St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition)
K. Contract 83-1, Change Order 05, Water Treatment Plant
(Control Valves)
p15 L. Final Plat Application, Century Addition
Y
11M. Final Plat Application, Suncliff 2nd Addition
f.IyN. Final Plat Application, Holmes Addition
rs10. Grading Permit Application, Lexington Place South and
Lexington Place 2nd Addition
z1 -P. Final Plat P Application, Safari Addition -LiQ. Project 411, Review Request/Authorize Feasibility Report,
P Patrick Eagan Park (Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet)
V. T:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
p 1.5 A. Project 404, Lexington Place South (Streets 6 Utilities)
1 63 B. Project 400, Oak Cliff Pond (Lift Station 6 Force Main
Outlet)
p,jLC. Project 398, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Streets d Utilities)
(Continued from 5-15-84 Meeting)
p.91 D. Vacate Utility Easment, Lakeside Estates
P.0 E. Vacate Street Easement, Twinview Manor 2nd Addition
1
VI.
VII.
IR
X.
RI.
OLD.BUSINESS
p 95 A. Alan J. 8 Baerbel C. Draenckhahn for Rezoning from A •
I (Agricultural District) to RB (Roadside Business District)
Consisting of Approximately .68 Acres in Part of the SE1/4
of the NE 1/4 of Section 4, T -27N, R -23W (Will be continued
J to a future City Council meeting)
�p}l B. Contract 84-11, Approve Plans 6 Specifications/Authorize
Advertisement for Bids (Oak Cliff Pond)
NEW BUSINESS
101 A. Sienna Corporation (Rod Hardy) for Preliminary Plat, Birch
P Park Addition, Consisting of Approximately 43 Acres a
Containing 77 Dwelling Units in Outlots B, C, D, E and F,
Windcrest 2nd Addition
P. 110 B. Corporate Construction for Waiver of Plat to Split a Duplex
Lot for Individual Ownership, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition,
Lot 2, Block 1, in the SW 1/2, Section 25 i
'p.115 C. Suncliff Development Company for a Variance from the
Sideyard Setback Along a Public Street, Suncliff 1st
Addition, in the NW 1/4 of Section 29
D. NW. Mutual Life Insurance for a Resolution Providing for a
Concurrent Detachment and Annexation of Incorporated Land,
in the N 1/2 of Section 3
ADDITIONAL ITEMS
133 A. Municipal Center Landscaping •
p r3`i B. Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission
p13(,C. Contract 84-6, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for
p Bids (Sealcoating)
13j D. Contract 84-14, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for
P AA Bids (Lexington Place 2nd Addition s Lexington Place South)
E. Contract 84-15, Approve Plans/Aurhorize Advertisement for
P Bids (SunCliff 2nd Addition)
VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
ADJOURNMENT
0
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
• FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: MAY 31, 1984
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION MEMO FOR JUNE 5, 1984, CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
After approval of the May 15, 1984, regular City Council minutes
and special City Council meeting minutes for December 22, 1983,
January 10, 1984, March 27, 1984 and May 24, 1984, and the agenda
for the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting, the following items
are in order for consideration.
•DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
A. Fire Department -- There are no items to be considered
under Fire Department at this time.
B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered
under Police Department at this time.
C. Parks and Recreation Department -- There are ,no items
to be considered under Parks and Recreation Department at this
time.
• D. Public Works Department -- There are no items to be
considered under Public Works Department at this time.
1-1 L
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting •
Page Two
There are seventeen (17) items on the agenda referred to as Consent
Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the
City Council desires to discuss any of the items in further
detail, those items should be removed from the consent agenda
and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required
is brief.
CONTRACTORS' LICENSE
A. Contractors' License -- The City has received contractor
license applications for contractors who do work in the City
of Eagan and seven -county metropolitan area. All of these contrac-
ors are considered reliable according to the Protective Inspections
Department. The necessary documents and fees have been submitted
and it is the recommendation of the Chief Building Inspector
that the contractors' licenses be approved. Enclosed on
pages Swc is a"copy of the list of proposed contractor license.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the contractor
license list as presented.
•
•
0
• MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE. PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
DATE: www ��` JUNE 1, 1984
RE: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE PER CITY CODE 6.42
The following lists of contractors have been doing work in the
City of Eagan, in the seven county metro area, and are considered
reliable. They have submitted the necessary documents and fees
and I would recommend that they be licensed to be a contractor
in the City of Eagan.
DP/nlb
•
J
3
FOR JUNE 5 1984 CITY COUNCIL MEETING:
GENERAL CONTRACTORS:
1. Al's Construction
2. Bjorklund Construction Co.
3. Colorcraft Corp.
4• Custom Energy Homes
5. Floodmaster Engineering Corporation
6. Kraus Anderson
7. Michael Construction, Inc.
8• Ordeen Splittstoser Cont., Inc.
9• Mike Rvgh Homes
10. Ken Smith'Remodeling
11, Stinar Corporation
12. Yankee Doodle Associates
HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR:
1. Mark Alberty
2. Linda 6 George Myhre
HEATING 6 VENTILATING CONTRACTORS:
1. Farmington plumbing d Heating
2. Churchill's Home Heating/Cooling. Inc.
SWIMMI� POOLS:
1. Fools, Inc.
.'l ry�i'i •I. I.Id �TC'�I �. �.
•
C�
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1989, City Council Meeting
• Page Three
PERSONNEL ITEMS
B. Personnel Items -- The following Personnel Items are to
be considered:
1) The City has retained Mr. Robert Wieken as a mechanical
inspector on a contractual basis to assist the Protective
Inspections Department with building inspections.
Unfortunately, Mr. Weiken, who is semiretired, is
undergoing surgery and is unable to perform inspection
services for the City. Due to the volume of inspections,
it was necessary to contact Mr. John Vujovich, who
was the chief building inspector in Inver Grove Heights
and is retired, to assist until Mr. Weiken returns
to the City as an inspector. Mr. Vujovich will be
hired as a consultant under the same arrangement as
Mr. Weiken and will work at the pleasure of the chief
building inspector. Mr. Vujovich did assist the City
of Eagan during the summer of 1983 and is very familiar
with the inspection schedules and the City.
•
•
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To retain Mr. John Vujovich
as a contractual building inspector to perform building inspection
services in the absence of Mr. Robert Weiken.
2) The City has approved a part-time clerk typist which
will be included in the clerical pool, bringing the
total manpower to 1.5 in the City Hall clerical pool.
The advertisements, interviews and selection process
has been completed and is the recommendation of the
Administrative Assistant, Holly Duffy, that Shelly
Lysne be hired as 'a part-time clerk typist to serve
the clerical pool under the supervision of the Department
of Administration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the temporary
services of Mr. John Vujovich and the hiring of a part-time
employee, Shelly Lysne.
S
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Four
-13, FINAL PAYMENT/PARK RIDGE ADDITION
C. Contract 83-13, Final Payment/Acceptance (Park Ridge Addition,
Et Al.) -- We have received a request for final payment from
our consulting engineering firm along with a Certification of
Compliance to previously approved plans and specifications for
the installation of trunk watermain within Covington Lane in
the Park Ridge Addition and a sanitary sewer lateral to service
the Robert B. Lewis House for Battered Women on Nicols Road.
Final inspections have been performed and verified by representa-
tives of the Public Works Maintenance Division with the end product
found to be acceptable for perpetual maintenance by the City.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third and
final payment of $4,108.58 to S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc., for
Contract 83-13 and accept for perpetual maintenance.
CONTRACT 83-5, FINAL PAYMENT/TREATMENT PLANT UTILITIES
D. Contract 83-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Treatment Plant
Utilities) -- We have received a request for final payment from
our consulting engineering firm along with a certification of
compliance to previously approved plans and specifications for
the installation of transmission watermains from the existing
wells to the future treatment plant along with sanitary sewer,
storm sewer and first phase street improvements to service the
water treatment plant and adjacent benefited properties. Final
inspections and acceptance has been performed or reviewed by
Public Works Maintenance personnel and found to be in order for
consideration of acceptance for perpetual maintenance.
The final contract amount takes into consideration the approval
of Change Orders #1 and #2 listed as additional agenda items
under the Consent Agenda for the June 5 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the seventh
and final pay request for Contract 83-5 in the amount of $8,516.56
to Northdale Construction Company and accept the project for
perpetual maintenance.
r
•
•
FJ
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Five
It
CONTRACT 84-8/WILLIAMS PIPELINE ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
E. Contract 84-8, Approve Williams Pipeline Encroachment Agreement -
With the development of the Westbury and Lexington Square Additions,
several public improvements had to be initiated to provide the
proper utilities for these developments. These consisted of
Contracts 84-2 (Wescott Trunk Sanitary Sewer), Contract 84-8
(Westbury and Lexington Square Trunk and Lateral Utilities and
Streets) and Contract 84-9 (Lexington Avenue Trunk Watermain).
Each of these contracts required the construction of a utility
across the existing Williams Brothers Pipeline easement which
traverses across the McCarthy property, through the Westbury
Addition and proceeds easterly along the southside of Wescott
Road, crossing Lexington Avenue. Subsequently, because this
exclusive easement of Williams Pipeline requires written permission
from the company prior to any construction activity within that
easement, it is necessary for the City to enter into an "Easement
Encroachment Agreement" with the Williams Pipeline Company.
An agreement was prepared by Williams Brothers which authorizes
the property owner (Lexington South Incorporated), the developer
(Gabbert Development Inc.) and the City to perform grading and
utility/street construction work within their easement. Because
of the grade changes associated with the development, their standard
• policy would have required the pipelines to be relocated to the
proper elevation at an estimated cost of $55,000. In lieu of
this pipe relocation, they have agreed to accept the addition
fill beyond their standard limits in consideration for the City
accepting "all direct or indirect increased cost, including but
not limited to additional labor, materials, street and trailway
repairs, or other damages, arising out of the existance of said
improvements, and elevation and grade changes" required by the
City's and development's construction activities.
The Public Works Director cannot find evidence of a similar agree-
ment being entered into between the City and Williams Pipeline
for previous pipeline crossings. It appears that this will be
the first formal agreement and could be precedent setting for
future construction activities. However, it is necessary before
authorization can be granted to perform this work. All the above -
referenced contracts have already been let and the contractor
has proceeded with construction operations on other areas outside
these pipeline easements.
After review of the agreement by the Public Works Director and
City Attorney, it is recommended that the Council approve the
agreement and authorize its execution.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the easement
• encroachment agreement for Williams Pipeline Company and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
7
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Six
NATIONAL FLAG DAY
F. National Flag Day -- The City has received a sample Proclamation
from the National Flag Day Committee in Baltimore, Maryland,
asking that June 14 be recognized as National Flag Day. Enclosed
on pageCJ is a copy of a Proclamation for National Flag
Day, June 14, 1984.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To proclaim National
Flag Day, June 14, 1984.
Pi
C,
J
0
Flag Day Informatl*on
w0=91MMSESM1�1
.•.�:Mi,^:'i:'.'Ar�:'::.i•.it:�iMh'1t":'+',Ccti A.�•;t•
National Flag DayCommittee418 South Broadway
i.✓<.ear•+.YF:A!'!Is..CW`liWi.-•'IUY�KY/Wi'+::•
:•iYYW,+•.�K ill?JI'.?Y1L'i,-[:it{a!��'
Baltimore. Maryland 21231 Pause For The Pledge of Allegiance
SAMPLE PROCLAMATION
481A
NATIONAL FLAG DAY, JUNE 14, 1984
WHEREAS, by Act of the Congress of the United States, dated June 14, 1777,
the first official flag of the United States was adopted, and
WHEREAS, by Act of Congress, dated August 3, 1949, June 14 of each year was
designated "National Flag Day" and the Star-Spangled Banner Flag House
• Association in Baltimore, Maryland, has been the official sponsor since 1952
of National Flag Day for the United States, and
•
WHEREAS, on June 14, 1980, the Star-Spangled Banner Flag House Association
developed a national campaign to encourage all Americans to PAUSE FOR THE
PLEDGE of Allegiance as part of National Flag Day ceremonies, and
WHEREAS, since this concept caught the imagination of Americans everywhere
and has received wide citizen support and recognition, there has now been
created the National Flag Day Foundation, Inc. in Baltimore, Maryland to
plan the nations Flag Day ceremonies.
WHEREAS, Flag Day celebrates our nation's symbol of unity and stands for
our country's devotion to freedom to the rule of all and the equal rights
of all.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, (your name and title), do hereby proclaim June 14, 1984
as Flag Day in (your state), and urge all citizens of (your state) to pause
at 7:00 P. M. (EDT) on this date for the Fourth Annual PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE,
and recite with all Americans the Pledge of Allegiance to our Flag and
Nation.
9
A Prnpram of the Natinnal Flae Dav Foundation. Inc.. Baltimore. Maryland.
•
E
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
ADVISORY PARKS RESIGNATION/DOUGLAS MCNEELY
G. Resignation of Douglas McNeely/Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission Member -- Enclosed is a letter from Douglas McNeely,
copies on page // submitting his resignation as a member
of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. The City Adminis-
trator would like to discuss briefly a replacement for Mr. McNeely
at the time the Consent Agenda is handled or later in the meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation
letter of Douglas McNeely, a member of the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission.
/O
_cy 24, 1984
• The Honorable i-lyor end Ci*T, Council of Eagan
Nr. Yom Hedgcs, City Administrator -
12r. Iien Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation
h'--mbers of the Advisory narks and Recreation Commission
Dear I•'adams and Gentlemen:
Congratulations on the successful passing of the bond referendum. This will enhanco
the city of Eagan and bring us That much closer to the standards that were set in
the gaster Parks Pian.
I write you today to ask that you accent my i=mediate resignation from the Advisory
Parks and Rocreation Commission. Such thought h" gone into t --"-is decision. As you
1,sow, I began- a now occupation last November in bar',cing which rcouires travel time.
So far in 1984, I have missed over half of the meetings including sub-committoo and
special meetings. Even though the minutes arc prep_arcd in an. cxcellent m.^,rner, much
is missed in the form of discussion and debate. I have a1w, ys bccn c believor in
giving 1Q0" of your^elf to anything you ene::Rver. In thi: cno- I cC:_1'.ot. Y�4., afore,
1 -.Ch that Pau rGDl ^.Ce M3 with .n per Gon P^e c. ^n commit -,nd Cttcnd.
I Lar mnnv fond n3raorias pad hav-- m.a.dc _-,ny fino nccuni:aancies duri- thn pact
th_ec and one half years. In my opinion., i:o have the finost ;mayor, City Council,
Cit;=dmir-istrator, Director of Parks and Recreation, .,dvisory Parks and Recreation
Commission, Planning Commission and city staff^ny populus could hon-- for.
• If at nny time I ray be of service to the city of Eagan please don't hesitate to
give de a call.
Once again let me thank you for your patience and cooperation and keep up the good
work.
Sinceroly yours,
Douglas C. McNeely
P.S. Please advise me :;en if you want my copy of the Master Par'.cs Plan back.
0
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Eight
CONTRACT 83-5, CHANGE ORDER/WATER TREATMENT PLANT
H. Contract 83-5, Approve Change Order #1 (Water Treatment Plant -
Utilities and Streets), -- Change Order #1 provides for a change
in the scope of the contract to delete a portion of the storm
sewer laterals to service the future Water Treatment Plant parking
lot due to a conflict of scheduling activities between the treatment
plant general contractor and this utility contractor. Because
of the completion time frame for the City contract, it was not
possible for the storm sewer lateral to be constructed. However,
the contractor had purchased the materials which were delivered
to the site and subsequently secured and stored by City personnel.
Therefore, the original installation of this storm sewer lateral
is being deleted from the contract. However, the contractor
is being paid for the materials that have been delivered. Admin-
istratively the proper way to handle this transaction is through
a change order to the standard contract. Change Order #1 provides
for an addition to the standard contract amount of $1,465.76
for the materials only. The reduction in payment for the deletion
of the actual- installation will be accounted for in the final
close out of the contract by a reduction in final payment quantity.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order
• #1 to Contract 83-5 in the amount of $1,465.76 (ADD) and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
E
CONTRACT 83-5, CHANGE ORDER #2/WATER TREATMENT PLANT
I. Contract 83-5, Change Order #2 (Water Treatment Plant --
Streets and Utilities) -- During the jacking of the trunk watermain
underneath Yankee Doodle Road to connect the well sealed to the
Water Treatment Plant, the contractor encountered a Northwestern
Bell Telephone manhole vault. The location of this telephone
manhole had not been located by Northwestern Bell at either the
design or the construction phase of the work and subsequently
its existence was not known until the contractor hit it on his
jacking operations. Subsequently, the contractor was delayed
for eight working hours until Northwestern Bell could perform
the modifications to the manhole to allow us to proceed with
our construction phase. Subsequently, the City's contractor
has submitted a claim for $1,624 for down time delay and remobiliza-
tion costs which amount to $1,624.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #2
to Contract 83-5 in the amount of $1,624 (ADD) and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
/1,
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Nine
L I
ORDER PUBLIC HEARING/ST. FRANCIS WOODS 3RD ADDITION
J. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order
Public Hearing (St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition) -- We have received
a petition to vacate a portion of the drainage and utility easement
across Lots 1, 2, 5 and 6, of Block 2, St. Francis Wood 3rd Addition
as shown on the map enclosed on page // The vacation of
this drainage and utility easement is requested to allow a better
location of the townhouse units within these blocks due the con-
straints imposed upon these building sites by the existing ponding
area located at the rear of these lots.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition
and order the public hearing to vacate drainage and utility ease-
ments over Lots 1, 2, 5 and 6 of Block 2, St. Francis Woods 3rd
Addition to be held on , July , 1984.
CONTRACT 83-1, CHANGE ORDER #5/WATER TREATMENT PLANT
K. Contract 83-1, Change Order #5, Water Treatment Plant (Control
Valves) -- We have received a recommendation from our consulting
engineer to expand a portion of the Water Treatment Plant contract
to incorporate two changes as follows: •
Part A: This provides for a change in the control console
in the Water Treatment Plant to incorporate the Lexington
Avenue booster station controls which would constructed
during the fall of 1984 to be put on line during June of
1985. At the time of the design of the Water Treatment
Plant, it was not anticipated that this Lexington Avenue
booster station would be constructed at its present time
schedule. Because of its schedule, it is appropriate to
incorporate the telemetry equipment and control modules
into the overall control console of the Water Treatment
Plant.(ADD $14,080)
Part B: This provides for incorporation of future pump
control modules, digital displays and alarm controllers
within the Water Treatment Plant control console. To incorpor-
ate this work at this time will be substantially less expensive
than future field installations as additional wells are
added to the system every few years. (ADD $4,090)
This proposed change order has been reviewed with the Public
Works Director and the Utility Superintendent and found to be
timely and cost effective to be included under this contract.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #5 •
to Contract 83-1 in the amount of an additional $18,170 and author-
ize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
/A
k WET LAND
,v.w. c>awea of i
�NoarN L,rc or curuor 8
our�or a EASY SHORE Ii E—�
\ 1 59.00 X56 MEti� a \
G�`1N E c \ \
UJA iB-Z c�JRVEY \�
29
0b / 3e.� 3
CD i \
00 SSB 9,.m de of AC6rrEr YB L,NE
00..c °0 S
N CO IN 0 LOT + L0y !u O OY'Co 3 6s 96
\ lm uQ Zoll .130
0TR 9S`� 6s
0
N ♦ n r ry roP coT o°
a m P cP o ,? )
io D4 ss ^� �o 2 O.
q� co
oO,.
N Rr�ERay �/ Q nJ O Z 9 �1ss y° F �B \ F U
J D G E yNr a .�� "k-11 O°�
S ree �. w�ro T \aboo rl�
`�1/\f\r'I wwr�o oFJWvepry io2Oo oo••E c,"� / psi e7
k 4v
J
_ _ ti 3e oo 89 a, / oO� ho
A�Ir. r I r
LIi I I I.I�� 0 0 W� W 5 �e�oo 3z.0o r$ P� �—� oaA �nac a o / 6
Q ,� 0 n �1TILILY ESSLMCdi 6
0 a9 W O U (O !� l 38.00 •OO O s s
N N J� W m M o M O I ^ •� /� ?p �/
Q CI N pj
?
wcsrecLY zLo
W e v d T f m M
OurL T c— K Loy2 o
% O i 38, LOT m .p
)� o S 3 0
YI WEST LI�i4 �e`�o 00 E 3z.e0 �OT4 u k�~ .EI 00 fE
7^�-- it4?4 • �ra"l/°
S
5 o�> lb
10
78* 0p ju1144C
VA,
`
i.
Ile
oOUTLOT A
CN Gtr � -.. ♦ A. �. 'n.
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Ten
•
Is
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/CENTURY ADDITION
L. Final Plat Application, Century Addition -- We have received
an application for final plat approval for the Century Addition
located in the northwest corner of Coachman Road and Yankee Doodle
Road (County Road 28). Enclosed on page /6 is a copy of
the final plat for Council's reference. All conditions placed
on the preliminary plat approved by Council action on October
18, 1983, have been complied with as well as the final plat con-
figuration. In addition, all final plat application materials
have been submitted, reviewed and approved by staff and is being
forwarded to the Council for favorable consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
application for the Century Addition and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
1:!5
• I i _ p A :�� w ro a.ar «n ur rYI w lY _ i.r or In.. rr a.r. t..
80
L _ M.r...lp. t..r .1 ww.•yrr101. rN rY 4.. --
1
56�Y•51'00-E
ip cc;i'n
...,Abbirlu rr
_!:'% 1 u . ro-.
1, n.rn..r .Id ••••- u r
-. ul 1� d rr .e..� .1 t.w........ ...n .....
`i -.r H _ .'tlU 7 ij wN alar 4r r! nu.
•• _� wtw .r.. trlr MN urn ,_
I .r Mllir••e u r M W r min •surN a � In rl
Xlldr 1 In_'n ]0 ba �
1T. eortn it. or CA,a.N. Na, Isle
q
u.we te mw a b\rl
of 9outn 09 an... fl elms... 00 .r.M. [a.0.
n a✓«
NORTH o n.m.s t/! mcn by a inah floe NIN- MrIt 00tt 910urbW]-=Is--
I ..r
Pltl. e.N YG -N0 N6!, u=Is---U
• Wna
1 4ntl ,.n lrf llul i\li W.r�r..rr IIIN 1. M •Illu .1 �r ..mrr .•
Ittt. • '<IN \., rr w 41r .••.NN le 4.n
t`rot.. •rl{ t or aa9oi a.m..t•a to
DELMAR H. SCHWANZ "' PRELIMINARY COPY
SUBJECT TO REVISION .. •r' '"db�.'��11'I+�(•�>'4';.
LAND SURVEYORS INC. 4
U
LOCATION
MAF'
�.. .,... •e .+1 .N. r.nl \r w.I r. .I •,.•-•.n�,.......� ...
rr.l
p U. r.•nr .erim. r b. rr r rnYlo .uuN ul. r•r •1 —
SEC 9- IVIP27. Rd
23
I
run mu.a .r...r .vmanu
n• in
. 1 w
I le dmY •...wl
uI' I. i.IpNrr d gnld. 0. i1rMq r,tN rN do..n.
-
'
xl 1[M '
T
l
-
I
i.n
i1 v.
f
1 oYr . L rl•e,r
xe X4l Orr
�
I
-
1
L .Irr.. J• wf ..li [I:..Ire. wwY« lo.wwr... Ilhww 4r..1 ... M...,..
s
lu iw.rl pnpr .elr � i.r a IM.
it ilrYr i. il•m•.r. a 4w«I r•r, •. �
'
it %i ri ii^rvaila.Yu
rr rrl...wa _
M luaa4 Ina.ry o .enl.y.
1
41111
-E
I'-
li-
-S69.OB-
S99•51'00
tl
/
1 r[ rlr,l 411w1 YN el rl,e•,Mlir, • e•
w
v_ _w.ao
_ —
— _
— ——P��:
ep
:Le.TG..
r
_Iv —
_
r
/ .
Y�.r,
•L
s
rl
81 2
8
r
8
3
.m
•
8
§
.[9•]e
Cr,r rl:M Irntulw l..... , tr ar•rl. i elrMul,N
r
�T
o
n. e9.-
se]•v'ao[
9
n. x•f�n- Q
\r'
0-
q..
8
_
– _
8
l.aa
/
: 1 e..•p r rib nn 1 Y« ..-.rr .rNl.u...w nm•n wule.r \I. rlr�
p
p
p
Y1
/
' • 4-.wn n• Y wlr rl„ = w rra.r • e ,♦
alar• r Pellr e,.rrr• .-
2
_ _lel.:
_
_193. _ _
1,
a re,l. Irl, mi ,Y
I
w
ar«r•• • wne.„r..
1�'
IOa er wI•.r w. i. e.,u. n,.rr•,. rrr rn,.+ o.
hj
I
q
G
.
�
l
• I i _ p A :�� w ro a.ar «n ur rYI w lY _ i.r or In.. rr a.r. t..
80
L _ M.r...lp. t..r .1 ww.•yrr101. rN rY 4.. --
1
56�Y•51'00-E
ip cc;i'n
...,Abbirlu rr
_!:'% 1 u . ro-.
1, n.rn..r .Id ••••- u r
-. ul 1� d rr .e..� .1 t.w........ ...n .....
`i -.r H _ .'tlU 7 ij wN alar 4r r! nu.
•• _� wtw .r.. trlr MN urn ,_
I .r Mllir••e u r M W r min •surN a � In rl
Xlldr 1 In_'n ]0 ba �
1T. eortn it. or CA,a.N. Na, Isle
q
u.we te mw a b\rl
of 9outn 09 an... fl elms... 00 .r.M. [a.0.
n a✓«
NORTH o n.m.s t/! mcn by a inah floe NIN- MrIt 00tt 910urbW]-=Is--
I ..r
Pltl. e.N YG -N0 N6!, u=Is---U
• Wna
1 4ntl ,.n lrf llul i\li W.r�r..rr IIIN 1. M •Illu .1 �r ..mrr .•
Ittt. • '<IN \., rr w 41r .••.NN le 4.n
t`rot.. •rl{ t or aa9oi a.m..t•a to
DELMAR H. SCHWANZ "' PRELIMINARY COPY
SUBJECT TO REVISION .. •r' '"db�.'��11'I+�(•�>'4';.
LAND SURVEYORS INC. 4
U
•
•
Agenda Information
June 5, 1984, City
Page Eleven
Memo
Council Meeting
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/SUNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION
M. Final Plat Application, Suncliff 2nd Addition -- We have
received an application for final plat approval for the Suncliff
2nd Addition which is the second phase progression of this develop-
ment. Enclosed on page /to is a copy of the final plat for
Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary
plat approval approved by Council on October 18, 1983, have been
complied with in addition to this final plat conforming to the
concept of the originally approved preliminary plat layout.
In addition, all final plat application materials have been sub-
mitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable
consideration by the City Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
of the Suncliff 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
/7
1 i
1.
BLACKMAWN
6r S vim[
0rLOr
q
�N
S ! Y%Oe'E
A
ira: •3 r�•Irrlc S ws!`+j�e6
A y�..-CUFF�7�..-_ ROA[
'�M!�µu•'mY!YY. "b mR 4u1.•uu
i. q['ii/!!Gee }Lq}�b'��euC elx
6
vn
19ay
-q1 lx-
SUN CLIFF SECOND ADDITION
r'"r I�Y'•�w'v'fis
o+
♦ p
•� 3
n
I
e
n
e.Hvu'ig,F
F q
1
wmw w. r.m erlme. a vNih
Mry ! MI n .YP VN YP�e
;mnrl
6 e1 1•e. N IOIi ^n� N M
[f•uLx •I Irl OM YI Ir4
1M x•4n Yb J �b M 1/• N ��4.,
r •een, .um sn•...• mNena
Nnen n. Iun� n. emN. n
r,•,rn a e.P W
xer nbrc•
Der• Mn yearn 4, vf•q'
up•[ 9 L x IIN•
ww" WP
Nc. n. T 2 A 2
x�,•T O'�
S.uL�
e
Y_
.a
..gin l:r•
eMn /
SUN CLIFF SECOND ADDITION
r'"r I�Y'•�w'v'fis
o+
♦ p
•� 3
n
I
e
n
CR. WINDEN B ASSOCIATES INC
snKO $ VEYOese••-•
is 0 0
F q
1
=�
..gin l:r•
eMn /
ah7
'��.
I•-hnr
F
b
�
�:.'
m
nn•�
mhe
W
8�
iWr �Z•
Z
♦
�•me
�x••�
a
-'"gin
III
••/e
a�ip
�' e
.}' '',
�
u.ma
R_n�l
S
< III' !
1
■?
�q
•,r,nws
!
N/bxP9 nam
,•.
C�-
4 1
{{ S
e£
CR. WINDEN B ASSOCIATES INC
snKO $ VEYOese••-•
is 0 0
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Twelve
is
E
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/HOLMES ADDITION
N. Final Plat Application, Holmes Addition -- We received an
application for final plat approval for the Holmes Addition located
at .the northeast corner of Quarry Lane and Towerview Road. A
copy of this final plat referencing these two residential lots
is enclosed on page 2,0 for the Council's review. All conditions
placed on the preliminary plat approval by Council action on
April 3, 1984, have been complied with. In addition, all final
plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff
and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council
action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
application for the Holmes Addition and authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute all related documents.
//
HOLMES ADDITION
P11
NOONEEaONG
CON PIIMY, INC.
SNCEI 1 OE 1 SIIEEIS
O.
,•
,I
'•
�1""
1
��
LC MAYO
LAKE
;n�/
_
BLOCC
K I0-0
� 1
r y..
s
P11
NOONEEaONG
CON PIIMY, INC.
SNCEI 1 OE 1 SIIEEIS
•
171
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Thirteen
GRADING PERMIT/LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH & LEXINGTON 2ND ADDITION
O. Grading Permit Application, Lexington Place South and Lexington
Place 2nd Addition -- we received an application for a grading
permit to perform the subdivision grading prior to final plat
process for Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place
South. The grading plan conforms to the preliminary plat approved
by Council on April 17, 1984. All permit application requirements
have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order
for favorable consideration by the City Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the grading
permit application for Lexington Place South and Lexington Place
2nd Addition.
a/
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
u
FINAL PLAT/SAFARI ADDITION
P. Final Plat Application, Safari Addition -- We have received
an application for final plat approval for the Safari Addition
located on the northwest corner of Safari Pass and Galaxie Avenue.
Enclosed on page 2-3 is a copy of the final plat for the
Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary
plat approved by Council action on March 22, 1984, have been
complied with. In addition, all final plat application materials
have been submitted and reviewed by staff and is being forwarded
to the Council with a recommendation of favorable consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final
plat application for the Safari Addition and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
•
•
0702
I
F%giIRIT "A'•
i THE SAFARI ADDITION
I` .. i`. J !1 I Ct C =
I i:•�Iis.mm-_ _ ___.^'• rO� •r^'m a •ae'ar r.�asnnm•.warn 509.50.22•Eaf31wG
�•pl___
� •.
n bb
.90
•r �040
4s1 1 T�• ..
-OUTLOT B ? It 1.T
W poop •f`�nrA�t'1• Ot�1y _
fie lq ` a V
rrpnp P lal•e m fll I�fl • In ,
a! • l 1 J• 1''
n +„a +• ��� 3 A • may. J `�_ � y1 � _
J. 'C7 N 'f. Q • ¢ ,e �,4 P.321 a6 •337 �' t1�: 5
_ o _ Mtgo 05
14
aSe �• y."2 '”; mai • i D• �1 p ,1 o,t.
r �
to .
J.
•• �' ",, // NORTH
�o�'f ►"a'e OUTLOT A.;A,
In
'potilt's i
q;
z •,• 3 0 i• •' ,a •. • n» ...I uM er aM nR er aM avvl 1.
6. b
2 $ `�•• = \ � •nu••a to Mo • eeerly er bran error•
bf ' er
81. i� ) e bran• IR Ien er n fnen Inn olo• •w•.a
•\ r1$ •.< •Itn oNLLlc uo orlpl "!II u•t1'. wlro
\\•� rl I �Oanlr•1•e •no-+.
•o
t •` r• pre
7
19♦ Ira mn aml •4114 •u•nenu •n •nn.n an•nr
LOCATION MAP
�;U l7. 7W 77-A 273
r
r
r7 a
DELMAR H. SCHWANZ
LAND SURVEYORS I INC.
I
r pp11
L
Mlna + !r•a In •lean• u+lu• •a+•r•br IMle. •M
••eaJr•e.fNa Y lel• IIMr. "n" 1Y faa In aan M djolnla
IIMM
11OIVaee M lM 01•l.
')R
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page fifteen
J
•
PROJECT 411/FEASIBILITY REPORT
Q. Project 411, Review Request/Authorize Feasibility Report
- Patrick Eagan Park (Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) -- With the
proposed development of the Birch Park Addition (formerly the
Windcrest Addition) and the Pilot Pointe Addition (located between
Skovdale No. 1 and 2) combined with the future storm sewer discharge
from the multiple residential and commercial development of
the Lexington South property at Lexington and County Road 30,
the outlet for Patrick Eagan Park into Hurley Lake will become
imminent within the next 1 - 2 years. Due to the fact that
this outlet will have to cross Pat McCarthy's property to discharge
into Hurley Lake, it is recommended that a feasibility report
be prepared to discuss the proposed improvements at a public
hearing to authorize the subsequent initiation of easement acquisi-
tion through condemnation.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Authorize the preparation
of a feasibility report for Project 411 (Patrick Eagan Park
- trunk storm sewer outlet).
1�
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Sixteen
PROJECT 404/UTILITIES
A. Project 404, Lexington Place South and 2nd Addition (Utilities)
-- In response to a petition received by the developer (U.S.
Homes/Orrin Thompson), the Council authorized the preparation
of a feasibility report for the installation of utilities to
service the Lexington Place 2nd Addition and the Lexington Place
South Addition located east of Lexington Avenue at Duckwood
Drive. The feasibility report was presented to the Council
on May 1 with the public hearing being scheduled for June 5.
Enclosed on pages .24 through �— is a copy of the feasibility
report for the Council's review during the public hearing.
A copy of this report has been provided to the developer for
his review prior to the public hearing. As of this date, the
staff has not received any comments or objections to this proposed
project. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper
and sent to all potentially affected property owners who would
be assessed with a portion of this project.
L
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing •
and approve/deny Project 404 for the installation of utilities
to service Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place
South.
-'7J
m
0
REPORT
ON
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH ADDITION
AND
LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
0 PROJECT. NO. 404
Qe"
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
FILE N0. 49306
/�oaedLroo, ilaseae, f4a�iilila a 4d"c&4eed, lac.
• � P� Mr.�.�mato
2335 V 9...A #Vk .p 36
cS'!. P..4 Af"...y 55113
PA... 612.636-4600
May 1, 1984
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Re: Lexington Place South S
Lexington Place 2nd Addition
Project 404
Our File No. 49306
Dear Mayor and Council:
0,0 G. Ronrsrroo. P.£.
Reba w. Ronny. P.E.
Jm hC. Ar Vhk. P.E.
81.Ww A. 4mDrr,, P.E.
Rmn.rd E. Turns, P.E.
damn C. M. , P.E.
GHnn R. Cwt, P.E.
KWh A.Gordon. P
lLoroal E voyn.
R.ha K Four,
Rolm G. P.E.
.Namur L. S k. AL
D.m C. RurrsNr. P.E.
/ar, A. Rourdm P. E.
lfml A. Herron. P.E.
TM K. F. d. P.E.
..q~ r. R.urmann, P.E.
Robe R. PTr//me PE.
1+. Lr .PF.
Cnerhr A. Elwk.
L. Af. P...blr
Ho &f M. OW,
Transmitted herewith is our report for Lexington Place South and Lexington
Place 2nd Addition, Project 404. This report covers sanitary, sever, water
main, and storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a •
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC.
-;;7;(7,,,Z
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this Report was
prepared by me or under my direct super-
vision and that I am aduly Registered
Professional Engineer under the laws of
the State of Minnesota. /
Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
Date: May 1„ 1984 Reg. No. 14260
Approved by,!. 'cal -LL) 41h, .
Thomas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
Date:—�—� 7 •
0601c
A7
•
•
•
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water
main, and storm sewer to service Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd
Addition. Lexington Place South is located south of Duckwood Drive and east
of Lexington Avenue and includes 134 single family lots. Lexington Place 2nd
Addition is located north of Duckwood Drive and east of the first phase for
Lexington Place. Lexington Place 2nd Addition includes 6-16 unit, 1-12 unit,
and 1-8 unit condominium building. Also included is the construction of a
trunk water main along Lexington Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility Plan for the City of
Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract.
DISCUSSION:
SANITARY SEWER:
Lexington Place South - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes an 8 inch di-
ameter sanitary sewer constructed at a proper depth to service Lexington Place
South. The sanitary sewer will connect to a proposed 8" sanitary sewer to be
constructed as part of Lexington Square. The sanitary sewer will extend north
from Wescott Road as shown on the attached drawing. An easement will be re-
quired for construction of the sanitary sewer north from Wescott Road to the
south line of Lexington Place South. It is anticipated this easement will be
acquired by U.S. Home Corporation developers for Lexington Place South.
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes an 8
inch diameter sanitary sewer constructed in Blue Jay Way as shown on the at-
tached drawing. The sanitary sewer will connect to an existing manhole con-
structed as part of the first phase. The two 16 unit buildings located north
of Blue Jay Way will be served by the existing sanitary sewer constructed as
part of first phase for Lexington Place. The 16 unit building located north
0601c
Page 1.
Z�
of Duckwood Drive midway between Blue Jay Way will be served by an extension
of the proposed sanitary sewer from Lexington Place South.
WATER MAIN:
Lexington Place South - Water main proposed within Lexington Place South in-
cludes a 6 inch diameter water main as shown on the attached drawing. Also
included is the construction of an 18 inch diameter trunk water main along the
west side of Lexington Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road. The trunk
water main will connect to an existing 18 inch water main at both Wescott Road
and Duckwood drive. The 6 inch water main in Lexington Place South will con-
nect to the 16 inch trunk water main in Duckwood Drive at three locations and
to the 18 inch trunk water main in Lexington Avenue at one location. Also in-
cluded is the required number of valves and hydrants. Lexington Place South
is located in the intermediate pressure zone with static pressures of 60 psi.
Ll
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Water main proposed within Lexington Place 2nd
Addition includes extending the 16 inch diameter trunk water main in Duckwood •
Drive to it's east line. Also included is extending a 6 inch diameter water
main south from Duckwood Drive along the easterly portion of Blue Jay Way
which will connect to the existing 6 inch water main in the northerly portion
of Blue Jay Way. The 6 inch diameter water main will be looped to service the
2-16 unit buildings located north of Blue Jay Way. Also included is the re-
quired number of valves and hydrants. Lexington Place 2nd Addition is located
in the intermediate pressure zone with static pressures of 60 psi.
SERVICES:
Lexington Place South - Internal lots within Lexington Place South will be
served by 4 inch diameter sanitary sewer and 1 inch diameter water. It is
proposed to construct the service line 15 feet beyond the property line. It
is also proposed to construct water services from the 18" trunk main in Lex- •
Page 2.
0601c
z9
• ington Avenue to the existing homes. For purposes of this report it is as-
sumed these services will be 1-1/2" diameter to provide the proper pressure.
Lexington place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed
to be constructed from the main line to within 15 feet of the building unit.
Sanitary sewer service are proposed to be 6 inch diameter and water service
are proposed to be 4 inch diameter.
STORM SEWER:
Lexington Place South - Storm sewer- proposed herein will convey storm water
runoff from Lexington Place South to an existing 24" CMP culvert beneath Lex-
ington Avenue as shown on the attached drawing. From this point storm water
will be conveyed .naturally through an open channel to Hurly Lake (Pond
JP -11). The outlet for this pond is presently being constructed as part of
• Project No. 382.
Storm water within Lexington Place South will be contained within three
storm water ponds which are discussed as follows:
Storage
NWL
HWL
Ac -Ft.
Outflow
Pond JP -45A 899.7
900.7
1.74
0.5 cfs
Pond JP -45 894.0
897.3
3.14
1.0 cfs
Pond JP -45B 893 895.5 3.19 1.0 cfs
As indicated in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan, Pond JP -46 located di-
rectly east of Lexington Place South in Carriage Hills Golf course was in-
tended to outlet to Pond JP -45. Reviewing in detail the present characteris-
tics of Pond JP -46, it is recommended it's outlet -be directed to the southeast
to Pond JP -42 thus confining the drainage within Carriage Hills Golf Course to
• it's own boundaries along with Lexington Place South. Storm sewer pipe pro -
Page 3.
0601c
,30
posed herein include a combination of 24", 18", 15" and 12" diameter storm •
sewer pipe.
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Storm sewer proposed within Lexington Place 2nd
Addition includes extending an 18" diameter storm sewer pipe southerly in Blue
Jay Way as shown on the attached drawing. Also included is construction of a
manhole in conjunction with two catch basins and 15" storm sewer pipe within
the cul-de-sac located northerly of Blue Jay Way. The manhole will be con-
structed over the, existing 12" storm sewer constructed as part of the first
phase. It should also be noted that with the increase in development for this
drainage area, Pond DP -10 is presently experiencing a flooding condition and
that it's outlet to Pond DP -5 and then to Pond DP -4 should be considered
shortly.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA •
NW 1/4, SECTION 14
Lexington Place First Addition, Lot 1, Block 3 (Future Lexington Place 2nd
Addition)
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
Williams and Larue Addition
Block 1; Lots 1-4
Parcel 011-52 (Future Lexington Place South)
Parcel 030-53
Parcel 041-53
Parcel 043-53
Parcel 044-53
SE 1/4, SECTION 15
St. Francis Wood Addition - Outlot A •
Parcel 012-76
0601c Page 4.
3/
COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located
• at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows:
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
Sanitary Sewer $ 295,020
Water Main
Lexington Avenue Trunk Water Main 177,330
Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main 149,010
Services
Lexington Avenue Services 11,290
Lexington Place South Services 107,180
Storm Sewer 168,940
Page 5.
0601c
3-7-1
LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION
Sanitary Sewer
S 25,820
•
Water Main
81,190
Services
36,410
Storm Sewer
22,280
TOTAL ............................
$1,074,470
The total estimated project cost is
$1,074,470 which includes contingen-
cies and all related overhead. Overhead
costs are estimated
at 27% and in-
clude legal, engineering, administration,
and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to
belevied against the
benefited prop-
erty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of
this report in
Appendix B.
SANITARY SEWER:
Lexington Place South - Sanitary sewer
proposed herein is
lateral and is
therefore proposed to be assessed entirely
to the benefited
property. The
•
sanitary sewer from Wescott Road north to
the south line Lexington Place South
Page 5.
0601c
3-7-1
is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis at the lateral benefit from
trunk rate in effect at the time.of the public hearing. A corner lot credit •
of 150' in conjunction with assuming only the developable front footage would
be assessed was the basis for determining the assessable footage. All remain-
ing costs were divided equally amongst the benefited lots in Lexington Place
South including 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. Trunk area assessments
for this area are pending as part of Project No. 361 Wescott Trunk Sanitary
Sewer.
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer proposed herein is to be as-
sessed equally amongst the benefited units in Lexington Place 2nd Addition.
Trunk area sanitary sewer for this area was previously assessed as part of
Project No. 58.
WATER MAIN:
Lexington Place South - Trunk water main within Lexington Avenue is proposed
to be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate in effect at the time of •
the public hearing based on the present zoning use. It is proposed to.assess
only 50% of the front footage along Lexington Avenue to those parcels which
will receive benefit for looping purposes. However, it is proposed that the
trunk water main in Duckvood Drive be assessed at the lateral benefit from
trunk rate based on the entire front footage 'abutting Lexington Place South.
It is also proposed to assess those areas which have not been previously as-
sessed for trunk area water main if they receive direct benefit. Lateral
water main within Lexington Place South will be assessed completely to the
benefited lots in addition to assuming 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53.
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Trunk water main within Duckvood Drive is pro-
posed to be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate in effect at the
time of the public hearing for the entire front footage abutting Lexington •
0601c
Page 6.
35
• Place 2nd Addition. Lateral water main within Lexington Place 2nd Addition
will be assessed equally amongst the benefited units. Trunk area water main
for this area was previously assessed as part of Project No. 58.
SERVICES:
Lexington Place South - Services proposed within Lexington Place South will be
assessed equally amongst the benefited lots including 7 lot equivalents for
Parcel 044-53. It is proposed that the cost for the water main services along
Lexington Avenue be assessed equally to the benefited lots.
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Services proposed within Lexington Place 2nd
Addition will be assessed equally amongst the benefited units.
STORM SEWER:
Lexington Place. South - Storm sever within Lexington Place South is considered
lateral storm sewer and is therefore proposed to be assessed equally amongst
• the benefited lots including 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. Because the
storm sever witnin Lexington Place South conveys drainage only within it's
boundaries and is not designed to extend beyond it's boundaries, no areas out-
side of Lexington Place South excepting the 7 lot equivalents for Parcel
044-53 are proposed to be assessed for lateral storm sever. Trunk area storm
sever is proposed to be assessed to the area shown on the attached drawing
based on the rates in effect at the time of the public hearing.
TRUNK RATES: Trunk area and lateral benefit from trunk rates in effect at the
time of this report are as follows:
TRUNK AREA
Trunk Water Main Oversize
Agricultural
Residential Platted Lot
• Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize
Single Family
0601c
Page 7.
$1,120/Acre
$535/lot
$0.045/a.f.
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK
Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sever $13.10/F.F.
Lateral Benefit Water Main
Single Family $10.84/F.F.
Multiple $17.87/F.F.
REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as
follows:
Sanitary Sewer
Lateral
Lateral Benefit
Lateral Assessment
Water. Main
Trunk
Lateral
Trunk Area
Lateral Benefit from Trunk
Lateral Assessment
Services
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
0601c
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
Project Cost Revenue Balance
$295,020
$ 6,550
288,470
$295,020 $295,020 - 0 -
$177,330
149,010
$ 52,204
46,785
149,010
$326,340 $247,999 -$ 78,341
$119,100
$119,100
$119,100 $119,100 - 0 -
Page 8.
3$
0
•
•
Storm Sever
• Lateral $168,940
Lateral Assessment $168,940
Trunk Area Assessment 87,667
$168,940 $256,607 +$ 87,667
TOTAL............................................... +S 9,326
LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION
Project Cost Revenue Balance
Sanitary Sever
Lateral $ 25,820
Lateral Assessment $ 25,820
$ 25,820 $ 25,820 - 0 -
Water Main
•
Trunk
$
34,740
Lateral
46,450
Lateral Benefit from Trunk
$
13,796
Lateral Assessment
46,450
$
81,190
$
60,246
-$ 20,944
Services
Lateral
$
36,410
Lateral Assessment
$
36,410
$
36,410
$
36,410
- 0 -
Storm Sever
Lateral
$
22,280
Lateral Assessment
$
22,280
$
22,280
$
22,280
- 0 -
•
TOTAL ...............................................
-$ 20,944
Page 9.
0601c
36
The total estimated trunk fund balance for Lexington Place South and Lex-
ington Place 2nd Addition is -$11,618 (-$20,944 + $9,326 = -$11,618).
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plane and Specifications
Open Bids
Award Contract
Construction Completion
Final Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Taxes
0601c
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Page 10.
37
0
May 1, 1984
June 5,1984
June 5, 1984
June 29, 1984
July 3, 1984
Fall, 1984
Spring, 1985
Spring, 1986
0
11
• APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
PROJECT NO. 404
A. SANITARY SEWER
6,710
Lin.ft.
8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 0'-20' dp. in pl. @ $15.00/l.f.
$100,650
750
Lin.ft.
8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 20'-40' dp. in pl. @ $50.00/l.f.
37,500
38
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
34,200
230
Lin.ft.
MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/each
16,100
10
Lin.ft.
8" Outside drop @ $120.00/lin.ft.
1,200
300
Lin.ft.
4" CISP Service riser in pl. @ $18.00/lin.ft.
5,400
141
Each
8" x 4" wye in pl. @ $50.00/each
7,050
1
Each
Connect MH to existing 8" PVC @ $200.00/each
200
300
Cu.yds.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
3,000
LUMP
SUM
Clear b grub tree @ $1,000.00/L.S.
1,000
7,460
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
11,190
• 2.5
Acre
Seed w/fertilizer b mulch @ 51,500.00/acre
3,750
Total
$221,240
+5% Contingencies
11,060
$232,300
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
62,720
TOTAL.................................................
$295,020
- J
0601c
Page 11.
B. WATER MAIN
a) Lexington Avenue Trunk Water Main (Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road)
2,680 Lin.ft. 18" DIP Water main in pl. @ $37.00/lin.ft.
60 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $15.00/lin.ft.
60 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 6" DIP v/carrier pipe @ $100.00/lin.ft.
2 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,200.00/each
1
Each
18" Butterfly valve and box @
$2,400.00/each
3
Each
6" Resilient wedge gate valve
6 box @ $450.00/each
7,000
Lbs.
Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb.
2
Each
Connect 18" DIP to existing 18"
DIP @ $500.00/each
100
Cu.yds.
Rock stabilization below pipe
@ $10.00/cu.yd.
2.0
Acres
Seed with fertilizer 6 mulch @
$1,500.00/acre
320
Ton
Class 2 shouldering material @
$8.00/ton
2,740
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @
$1.50/lin.ft.
Total
+5Z Contingencies
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
TOTAL................................................
b) Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main
6,370 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft.
12 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each
11 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $450.00/each
6,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb.
100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
6,370 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/Lb.
Total
+5% Contingencies
0601c
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
TOTAL...............................................
Page 12.
34
40
$ 99,160
900
6,000
2,400
2,400
1,350
9,100
1,000
1,000
3,000
2,560
4,110
$132,980
6,650
$139,630
37,700 •
$177,330 .
$ 76,440
12,000
4,950
7,800
1,000
9.555
$111,745
5,585
$117,330
31,680
$149,010
•
•
C. SERVICES
a) Lexington Avenue Services
320
Lin.ft.
Jack or auger 114" Type "K" copper in pl. @ $24.00/l.f.
$
7,680
6
Each
114" Corporation atop in pl. @ $50.00/each
300
6
Each
114" Curb stop 6 box in pl. @ $80.00/each
480
Total
$
8,460
+5Z Contingencies
430
$
8,890
+27Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest
2,400
TOTAL...............................................
$
11,290
b) Lexington Place South Services
5,640
Lin.ft.
4" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $5.00/lin.ft.
$
28,200
5,640
Lin.ft.
1" Type "K" copper in pl. @ $5.00/lin.ft.
28,200
141
Each
1" Corporation atop in pl. @ $30.00/each
4,230
141
Each
1" Curb stop 6 box in pl. @ $80.00/each
11,280
5,640
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
8,460
Total
$
80,370
•
+5Z Contingencies
4,020
$
84,390
+27Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bund Interest
22,790
L
0601c
TOTAL ................................................ $107,180
Page 13.
Z
D. STORM SEWER
240 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $34.00/lir,.ft.
860 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft.
640 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft.
1,850 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft.
8 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
6 Each Std. 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
8 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each
1 Each 24" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $1,200.00/each
3 -Each 18" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $900.00/each
1 Each 15" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each
4 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash`guard @ S700.00/each
LUMP SUM Clear 6 grub trees @ $1,000.00/L.S.
30 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd.
I
100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pii pe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
3,590 Lin.ft. .Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
2.0 Acres Seed w/fertilizer b mulch @ $1,500.00/acre
Total
+5X Contingencies
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin'-& Bond Interest
TOTAL ................... ..........................
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
SUPDIARY
A. SANITARY SEWER
B. WATER MAIN
a) Lexington Avenue TrunklWater Main
b) Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main
C. SERVICE
a) Lexington Avenue Services
I
b) Lexington Place South Services
D. STORM SEWER
TOTAL LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH ............
i
Page 14.
0601c
I
5 8,160 •
24,080,
15,360
40,700
7,200
5,400
6,400
1,200
2,700
800
2,800
1,000
1,500
1,000
5,385
3,000
$126,685
6,335 •
$133,020
35,920
$168,940
$295,020
177,330
149.010
11,290
107,180
168,940
$908,770
•
• LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION
PROJECT NO. 404
A. SANITARY SEWER
730
Lin.ft.
8" PVC Sanitary sever in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft.
$
10,220
6
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH v/cstg. @ $900.00/each
Lin.ft.
5,400
12
Lin.ft.
MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/lin.ft.
Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each
840
8
Each
8"x6" wye in pl. @ $50.00/each
2,000
400
1
Each
Connect 8" PVC to ex. MH @ $400.00/each
6,000
400
100
Cu.yd.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
Each
1,000
730
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $300.00/each
1,095
100
Cu.yd.
Total
$
19,355
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
+52 Contingencies
975
Total
$ 60,875
$
20,330
3,055
+272 Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
5,490
TOTAL............................................... $ 25,820
B. WATER MAIN
• 780
Lin.ft.
16" DIP Water main in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft.
$ 21,840
1,590
Lin.ft.
6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft.
19,080
4
Each
Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each
4,000
1
Each
16" Butterfly valve b box @ $2,000.00/each
2,000
2
Each
6" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $450.00/each
900
6,000
Lbs.
Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb.
7,800
1
Each
Connect 16" DIP to existing 16" DIP @ $400.00/each
400
1
Each
Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $300.00/each
300
100
Cu.yd.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
1,000
2,370
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
3,555
Total
$ 60,875
+52 Contingencies
3,055
$ 63,930
+272 Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest
17,260
•
TOTAL ................................................ $ 81,190
Page 15.
0601c
C. SERVICES
1,360 Lin.ft
7 Each
1,360 Lin.ft
8 Each
1,360 Lin.ft
D. STORM SEWER
250 Lin.ft.
70 Lin.ft.
._ 4 Each
4 Each
1 Each
50 Cu.yds.
280 Lin.ft.
0601c
0
6" PVC Sanitary sever service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 8,160
6" PVC Clean-out @ $100.00/each 700
4" DIP Water main service @ $10.00/lin.ft. 13,600
4" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $350.00/each 2,800
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 2,040
Total $ 27,300
+5X Contingencies 1,370
$ 28,670
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 7,740
TOTAL................................................. $ 36,410
18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 7,000
15" RCP Storm sever in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 1,680
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 3,600
Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 3,200
Connect 18" RCP to existing 18" RCP @ $300.00/each 300 •
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 500
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 420
Total $ 16,700
+5% Contingencies 840
$ 17,540
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 4,740
TOTAL................................................ $ 22,280
LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION
SUMMARY
A. SANITARY SEWER $ 25,820
B. WATER MAIN 81,190
C. SERVICE 36,410
D. STORM SEWER 22,280
TOTAL LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDN. ...... $165,700
Page 16.
a
•
• APPENDIX,B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL .
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
PROJECT NO. 404
A. SANITARY SEWER
a) Lateral Benefit from Sever
Assessable
Total
Parcel
Description
Front Footage
Rate/FF
Assessment
Parcel
030-53
250
$13.10
$3,275
Parcel
041-53
250
$13.10
3,275
$6,550
Total
Parcel
Description
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington
Place South
• Block
1, Lots 1-8
8
$2,045
$ 16,367
Block
2, Lots 1-29
29
$2,045
59,331
Block
3, Lots 1-9
9
$2,045
18,412
Block
4, Lots 1-10
10
$2,045
20,458
Block
5, Lots 1-10
10
$2,045
20,458
Outlot
D
(8 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
16,367
Outlot
E
(10 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
20,458
Outlot
F
(13 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
26,597
Outlot
G
(18 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
36,826
Outlot
H
(11 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
22,508
Outlot
I
(8 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
16,367
SW 1/4
SECTION 14
Parcel
044-53
(7 Lot Equivalent
$2,045
14,321
TOTAL .............
141
$288,470
•
Page 17.
0601c
B. WATER MAIN
a) Lateral
Parcel Description
Lexington Place South
Block 1, Lots 1-8
Block 2, Lots 1-29
Block 3, Lots 1-9
Block 4, Lots 1-10
Block 5, Lots 1-10
Outlot D
Outlot E
Outlot F
Outlot G
Outlot H
Outlot I
SW 1/4 SECTION 14
Parcel 044-53
TOTAL .............
b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk
•
(7 Lot Equivalent) $1,057, 7,398 •
141 $149,010
Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot
Lexington Place South (1384.23 F.F. x $10.84/FF - $15,005)
Block
1,
Lots
1-8
Total
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
8
2,
Lots
$1,057
$ 8,454
29
$112
$1,057
30,647
9
1-9
9
$1,057
9,511
10
Block
4,
$1,057
10,568
10
$1,057
10,568
(8
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
8,454
(10
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
10,568
(13
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
13,739
(18
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
19,023
(11
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
11,625
( 8
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
8,454
(7 Lot Equivalent) $1,057, 7,398 •
141 $149,010
Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot
Lexington Place South (1384.23 F.F. x $10.84/FF - $15,005)
Block
1,
Lots
1-8
8
$112
Block
2,
Lots
1-29
29
$112
Block
3,
Lots
1-9
9
$112
Block
4,
Lots
1-10
10
$112
Block
5,
Lots
1-10
10
$112
Outlot
D
(8
Lot
Equivalent)
$112
Outlot
E
(10
Lot
Equivalent)
$112
Outlot
F
(13
Lot
Equivalent)
$112
Outlot
G
(18
Lot
Equivalent)
$112
Outlot
H
(11
Lot
Equivalent)
$112
Outlot
I
( 8
Lot
Equivalent)
$112.
134
Page 18.
0601c
Total
Assessment
$ 896
3,247
1,008
1,120
1,120
896
1,120
1,456
2,016
1,232
896 •
$ 15,005
• b) Lateral'Benefit from Trunk
(Cont'd.
Lot
1 -- -- 1
lot
Assessable
$
Total
Parcel Description
Front Footage
Rate/FF
Assessment
William and Larue Addition
$535/Lot
$
535
Block 1, Lot 1
179
$10.84(2)
$ 1,940.36
Block 1, Lot 2
135
$10.84
1,463.40
Block 1, Lot 3
156
$10.84
1,691.04
Block 1, Lot 4
140
$10.84
1,517.60
St. Francis Wood - Outlot A
641.42(1)
$17.87(3)
11,462.18
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
Parcel 043-53
417.36
$10.84
$ 4,524.18
Parcel 044-53
242.64
$10.84
2,630.22
SE 1/4, SECTION 15
Parcel 012-76
604.36(1)
$10.84
6.551.26
11
11
(1) Represents 502 of total front footage abutting Lexington Avenue.
(2) Single Family Rate
(3) Multiple Rate
c. Trunk Area
Area Credit
Parcel Description (acre) (acre)
Lexington Place South 50 Street -9.4
(Parcel 011-52) Pond -3.9
William 6 Larue Addition
$31,780.24
Assessable
Area Total
(acre) Rate Assessment
36.7 $1,120/Ac. $41,104
Block
1,
Lot
1 -- -- 1
lot
$535/lot
$
535
Block
1,
Lot
2 -- -- 1
lot
$535/Lot
$
535
Block
1,
Lot
3 -- -- 1
lot
$535/lot
$
535
Block
1,
Lot
4 -- -- 1
lot
$535/lot
$
535
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
Parcel 043-53 3.18 Street -0.64 2.54 $1,120/ac. $ 2,845
Parcel 044-53 6.82 Street -1.36 5.46 $1,120/ac. 6,115
TOTAL ......................... $52,204
0601c
Page 19.
c. Trunk Area (Cont'd.)
Total
•
Parcel Description
No. of Lots Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington Place South
Block 1, Lots 1-8
8
$301
$ 2,454
Block 2, Lots 1-29
29
$307
8,896
Block 3, Lots 1-9
9
$307
2,761
Block 4, Lots 1-10
10
$307
3,067
Block 5, Lots 1-10
10
$307
3,067
Outlot D
(8 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
2,454
Outlot E
(10 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
3,067
Outlot F
(13 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
3,988
Outlot G
(18 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
5,522
Outlot H
(11 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
3,374
Outlot I
( 8 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
2,454
134
$ 41,104
C. SERVICES
a) Lexington Avenue Services
Total
Parcel Description
No. of Services Cost/Service
Assessment •
William and Larue Addition
Block 1, Lot 1
1
$1,882
$ 1,882
Block 1, Lot 2
1
$1,882
1,882
Block 1, Lot 3
1
$1,882
1,882
Block 1, Lot 4
1
$1,882
1,882
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
Parcel 043-53
1
$1,882
$ 1,882
Parcel 044-53
1
$1,882
1,882
TOTAL
......................
$11,290
0601c
Page 20.
j47
•
•
b) Lexington Place South
Total
Parcel Description
No.
of
Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington Place South
Block 1, Lots
1-8
8
$760
$ 6,081
Block 2, Lots
1-29
29
$760
22,044
Block 3, Lots
1-9
9
$760
6,841
Black 4, Lots
1-10
10
$760
7,601
Block 5, Lots
1-10
10
$760
7,601
Outlot D
(8
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
6,081
Outlot E
(10
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
7,601
Outlot F
(13
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
9,882
Outlot C
(18
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
13,683
Outlot H
(11
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
8,362
Outlot I
( 8
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
6,082
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
Parcel 044-53
(7
Lot
Equivalent
$760
$ 5,321
TOTAL ...........
141
$107,180
•
D. STORM SEWER
a) Lateral
Total
Parcel Description
No.
of
Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington Place South
Block 1, Lots
1-8
a
$1,198
$ 9,585
Block 2, Lots
1-29
29
$1,198
34,747
Block 3, Lots
1-9
9
$1,198
10,783
Block 4, Lots
1-10
10
$1,198
11,982
Block 5, Lots
1-10
10
$1,198
11,982
Outlot D
(8
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
9,585
Outlot E
(10
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
11,982
Outlot F
(13
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
15,576
Outlot C
(18
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
21,567
Outlot H
(11
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
13,180
Outlot I
( 8
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
9,585
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
•
Parcel 044-53
(7
lot
equivalents)
$1,198
$ 8,387
TOTAL ..........
141
$168,940
Page 21.
0601c
b) Trunk Area
0601c
Page 22.
a
11
Assessable
Area
Credit Area
Total
Parcel
Description
(s.f.)
(s.f.) (s.f.)
Rate
Assessment
Lexington Place South
2,178,000
Str.
410,770 1,599,530
$0.045/s.f.
$71,979
Pond
167,700
SW 1/4,
SECTION 14
Parcel
043-53
138,690
Str.
27,740 110,950
$0.045
$ 4,993
Parcel
044-53
297,080
Str.
59,420 237,660
$0.045
10,695
TOTAL ........................................
$87,667
Total
Parcel
Description
No. of Lots Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington
Place South
Block
1, Lots
1-8
8
$537
$ 4,298
Block
2, Lots
1-29
29
$537
15,578
Block
3, Lots
1-9
9
$537
4,834
Block
4, Lots
1-10
10
$537
5,371
Block
5, Lots
1-10
10
$537
5,371
Outlot
D
(8
Lot Equivalent)
$537
4,297
Outlot
E
(10
Lot Equivalent)
$537
5,372
Outlot
F_
(13
Lot Equivalent)
$537
6,983
Outlot
C
(18
Lot Equivalent)
$537
9,669
Outlot
H-
(11
Lot Equivalent)
$537
5,909
Outlot
I
(8
Lot Equivalent)
$537
4,297
134
$ 71,979
0601c
Page 22.
a
11
is
0601c
Page 23.
50
LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION.
PROJECT NO: 404
A. SANITARY SEWER
Total
Parcel
Description
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington
Place 2nd
Addition
Block
1, Lot 1
16
$223
$ 3,561
Block
1, Lot 2
12
$223
2,671
Block
1, Lot 3
16
$223
3,561
Block
2, Lot 1
16
$223
3,562
Block
2, Lot 2
16
$223
3,562
Block
2, Lot 3
8
$223
1,781
Block
2, Lot 4
16
$223
3,561
Block
2, Lot 5
16
$223
3,561
TOTAL .......... 116
$25,820
•
B. WATER MAIN
a) Lateral
Total
Parcel
Description
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington
Place 2nd
Addition
Block
1, Lot 1
16
$400
$ 6,407
Block
1, Lot 2
12
$400
4,805
Block
1, Lot 3
16
$400
6,407
Block
2, Lot 1
16
$400
6,407
Block
2, Lot 2
16
$400
6,407
Block
2, Lot 3
8
$400
3,203
Block
2, Lot 4
16
$400
6,407
Block
2, Lot 5
16
$400
6,407
TOTAL
.............. 116
$46,450
is
0601c
Page 23.
50
n
(1� Multiple Rate
C. SERVICE
b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk
Total •
Parcel
Description
Total
Parcel
Description
No. of Units
Cost/Unit
Assessment
Lexington
Place 2nd Addition (772
F.F. x $17.87/F.F.
(1) _ $13,796)
1, Lot
Block
1, Lot 1
16
$119
$ 1,903
Block
1, Lot 2
12
$119
1,427
Block
1, Lot 3
16
$119
1,903
Block
2, Lot 1
16
$119
1,903
Block
2, Lot 2
16
$119
1,903
Block
2, Lot 3
8
$119
951
Block
2, Lot 4
16
$119
1,903
Block
2, Lot 5
16
$119
1,903
Block
TOTAL ..............
116
16
$13,796
(1� Multiple Rate
C. SERVICE
Total •
Parcel
Description
No.
of Units
Cost/Unit
Assessment
Lexington
Place 2nd Addition
Block
1, Lot
1
16
$314
$ 5,022
Block
1, Lot
2
12
$314
3,767
Block
1, Lot
3
16
$314
5,022
Block
2, Lot
1
16
$314
5,022
Block
2, Lot
2
16
$314
5,022
Block
2, Lot
3
8
$314
2,511
Block
2, Lot
4
16
$314
5,022
Block
2, Lot
5
16
$314
5,022
TOTAL ..............
116
$36,410
0601c
Page 24.
.5 1
•
• D. STORM SEWER
•
•
0601c
Page 25.
S.L
Total
Parcel
Description No.
of Units
Cost/Unit
Assessment
Lexington
Place 2nd Addition
Block
1,
Lot 1
16
$192
$ 3,073
Block
1,
Lot 2
12
$192
2,305
Block
1,
Lot 3
16
$192
3,073
Block
2,
Lot 1
16
$192
3,073
Block
2,
Lot 2
16
$192
3,073
Block
2,
Lot 3
8
$192
1,537
Block
2,
Lot 4
16
$192
3,073
Block
2,
Lot 5
16
$192
3,073
TOTAL ..............
116
$22,280
•
•
0601c
Page 25.
S.L
SUMMARY
PROJECT NO. 404
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ROLL
COST/LOT, UNIT,
PARCEL
Water Main
Storm
Sewer
Sanitary
Lateral
Trunk
Services
Sewer
Benefit
Total
Parcel
Description
Lateral
Lateral
From Trunk
Area
Lateral
Lateral
Trunk
Assessment
Lexington
Place South
Block
1,
Lots
1-8
$ 2,045
$1,057
$ 112
$ 307
$ 760
$1,198
$ 537
$ 6,016.00
Block
2,
Lots
1-29
$ 2,045
1,057
$ 112
307
760
1,198
'537
6,016.00
Block
3,
Lots
1-9
$ 2,045
1,057
$ 112
307
760
1,198
537
6,016.00
Block
4,
Lots
1-10
$ 2,045
1,057
$ 112
307
760
1,198
537
6,016.00
Block
5,
Lots
1-10
$ 2,045
1,057
$ 112
307
760
1,198
537
6,016.00
Outlot
D
$16,367
8,454
$ 896
2,454
6,081
9,585
4,297
48,134.00
Outlot
E
$20,458
10,568
$1,120
3,067
7,601
11,982
5,372
60,168.00
Outlot
F
$26,597
13,739
$1,456
3,988
9,882
15,576
6,983
78,221.00
Outlot
C
$36,826
19,023
$2,016
5,521
13,683
21,567
9,669
108,305.00
Outlot
H
$22,508
11,625
$1,232
3,374
8,362
13,180
5,909
66,190.00
Outlot
I
$16,367
8,454
$ 896
2,454
6,082
9,585
4,297
48,135.00
Lexington
Place 2nd
Addition
Block
1,
Lot 1
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
1,
Lot 2
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
1,
Lot 3
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ .192
--
$ 1,248
Block
2,
Lot 1
_$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
2,
Lot 2
$ 223
$ 400
$' 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
2,
Lot 3
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
2,
Lot 4
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
2,
Lot 5
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
sic
41ge
•
26.
0
(Continued)
William and Larue Addition
Block 1, Lot 1 --
Block 1, Lot 2 --
Block 1,,Lot 3 --
Block 1, Lot 4 --
St. Francis Wood
OUTLOT A --
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
SUMMARY
PROJECT NO. 404
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
COST/LOT, UNIT, PARCEL
-- $1,940.36
$
535
$1,882 --
-- $
4,357.36
-- $1,463.40
$
535
$1,882 --
-- $
3,880.40
-- $1,691.04
$
535
$1,882 --
-- $
7,988.44
-- $1,517.60
$
535
$1,882 --
-- $
3,934.60
$11,462.18 -- -- -- -- $11,462.18
Parcel 030-53 $ 3,275 $:3,275.00
Parcel 041-53 $ 3,275 $ 3,275.00
Parcel 043-53 $ 4,524.18 $2,845 $1,882 $ 4,993 $14,244.18
Parcel 044-53 $14,321 $7,398 $ 2,630.22 $6,115 $7,203 $8,387 $10,695$56,749.22
SE 1/4, SECTION 15
Parcel 012-76
0601c
$ 6,551.26 --
Page 27.
-- -- -- $ 6,551.26
W
�
�
O
O
O
Q
O
t—
Y1
2! 4
5 4 7 9
910`
I
O
U
0•
\
Ua TL1P
Olf'rL,„C � %
N
O50 -Ss W
O
I
3
2 1
3
z
1
\ \
S
29
2 7O
\ WTLOT A
5
28
3
I S
9
7
27
3
!/
O;L LdT 1 I
I I I 1 1
I IG' I
041-53
2e
, O
70
25
9
z4
7
B
9
10
z3
9
1
II
22
9
'
_L_L _L_L_l-i_,
19
IS 12
0
10
B.T
—=
7 LOT EOUIV4 LENT
030-55
PROPOSED
20
19
_
—
044- 33
LEXINGTON SQUARE'
Is
19 n 18
I
2
OVTLOT C
1-0.
'O
WILLIAMS LARUE ADD.
3
F �—
O —
043.53
1 1 2 3 4
9
9 1 6
5
LEXINGTON
AVE.
(CO. RD. NO. 43 )
ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD.
012.79
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM SEWER
RATE/F. F.
if CORNER LOT CREDIT 150 FT
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
SANITARY SEWER
-qrll�
F
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK
d ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul. Minn.
Date: MAY, 1984 PRO♦J. NO.
COMM. 49306 404
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
EAGAN, MINNESOTA St. Paul, Minn.
WATER MAIN Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO.
_[COMM. 49306 404
.-<4
W
p
O
O
O
O
cr
Y I 3 4 3 6 7 6 a O
O
v
7
h�T Ei
�O L
�
0fflZ
oso•ss
N
O
dT/
1 s z 1 1
i %
;
\\
3 ' 29 E
i
OUTLOT
4 5 26
y/}u7T
5 6 27 4 T, 0�
7 6
Ool-SS
25 i
6
I G I I
6 25 6 �O
r a 24 r
6 . 10 25 6
II Y
I
I
1413 12 21 10=
7LOT EQUIVALENT
030-53
'
I
20
044-33
_
IS IB 17 IB IY I
OUTLOT C ~
J F
WILLIAMS
6 LARUE
DO.
I
3 3
O
.013-53 1
2 3
4
•
i
s e7e s ® 0 6.r
1B"
--
mlivLawlamm
I
LEXINGTON AVE. (C0. R0. NO.43 )
ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD.
012 •76
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT
RESIDENTIAL RATE
®®® COMMERCIAL HIGH DENSITY RATE
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
EAGAN, MINNESOTA St. Paul, Minn.
WATER MAIN Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO.
_[COMM. 49306 404
.-<4
W
LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO. 43 )
ST. FRANCIS W000 ADD.
TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
WATER MAIN
TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT
!; 7
012-76
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
0
SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers •
St. Paul, Minn.
Date: MAY. 19841r PROJ. NO.
COMM. 49306 1 404
n
L
"Im
oQ
Dan.If��
3
• 1 4
J 9 e T e a
9
101
1a�o
POND
JP -050.
OOTTLOT A
i L 90
i
d 1
7LOT EOUIVAL ENT
= 044-53
O 0_
—2- 0 043.53
4
5
O,
T L S
a 1f
\110/
7
I
OUTLOT C
1r LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO.43 )
ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD.
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGANF MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER
0
0
050-53 vvi
W
3
041-53
030-53
ILLI MS a LARUE DO
1 x 1 s 4
012-76
I\ .
ERISTINO OPEN BWALE
POND JP -11
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
d ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minn.
Date: MAY, 19Ra pROJ. NO.
Comm. a9ao5 404
O`
O
Q
OI
O
Y
u
r�
I
Ll
LEXINGTON AVE. (CO.
ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD.
® AREA ASSESSMENT
,*40.43)
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER AREA ASSESSMENT
rr9
012 -7e
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
Pi
11
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLM
III, ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting E"Ineers •
St. Paul. Minn.
Oats: MAY. 1984 PROJ. NO.
COMM. 49306 1 404
0
•
ASSESSMENT AREA
NORTH
o. zqo
SCALE IN IN FEET
LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION
LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION
• UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
SANITARY SEWER
66
BLUE JAY WAY
LEXINGTON AVEACO.RO.NO.
w
E
0
0
0
0
3
Y
U
7
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minn.
Data: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO.
Comm, 49306 Ir 404
J
LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION
BLUE JAY WAY
ASSESSMENT AREA
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT
® COMMERCIAL HIGH DENSITY RATE
NORTH
LEXINGTON AVE. (C0. RD. NO.43 )
0 200
1 SCALE IN FEET
LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
WATER MAIN
41
•
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
& ASSOCIATES, INC. •
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minn.
Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO.
Comm. 49305 dnd
`v � 'i tlNlts
::t IS ttW�f?
� S i In
t�uNKs .t n�
ASSESSMENT AREA
NORTH
0 !00
SCALE IN FEET
I
LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION
BLUE JAY WAY
LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO.43 )
LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER
G L
I
C
9
SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
i ASSOCIATES, INC.
ComWting EngMeere
St. Paul. Minn.
Data: MAY. 198 PROD. NO.
Comm. 49306 1i 404
i
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Seventeen
•
•
PROJECT 400/LIFT STATION/FORCE MAIN OUTLET
B. Project 400, Oak Cliff Pond (Lift Station and Force Main
Outlet -- In response to a petition received from the developer
of the Oak Cliff Addition, the Council authorized the preparation
of a feasibility report to install the lift station and force
main outlet for the pond located in the center of this subdivision.
On May 1, the completed feasiblity report was presented to the
Council for their review and scheduling of the public hearing
to be held on June 5. Enclosed on pages _ (�_ through
i/ is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's
review during this public hearing. A copy of the feasibility
report has been sent to the developer for his review. In addition,
notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all potentially affected property owners. As of this date,
the staff has not received any objections or comments pertaining
to this proposed project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 400 for the installation of a storm
sewer lift station and force main outlet to the Oak Cliff pond.
G3
0
0
REPORT
ON
OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10)
TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET
PROJECT NO. 400
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
FILE N0. 49303
/�o.redt:oa, Rodme, 4m&*" a 44j"ia", Inc.
61,
i
36
SL. P..c M....r. 33113
P".- 612-636-4600
May 3, 1984
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Re: Oak Cliff Pond (AP -10)
Trunk Storm Sever Outlet
Project 400
Our File No. 49303
Dear Mayor and Council:
0tc.
Glenn R. Cook, P.E.
A'mh A. Gmd.n
Themm E'. Nor
Rchort w.'R
Repro G. &1h ... M. P.E.
M.n. L. So b. P.E.
Lo..ld C. &Wry 1. P.E.
fmy A. Bourton, P E.
Mark A. H... P.E.
rm K. FWU. P.E.
.MRbrl T. Fnlm.nn, P.E.
Raba R. Pl�pmr. P.F.
D..d L. A... P. E.
Ch.d. A. Emkm.
L. M. P.w .
H.Mn .V. Own
Transmitted herewith is our report for Oak Cliff Pond Outlet, Project 400.
This report covers trunk storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment
roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a •
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC.
_�Ira4z a --Z', I I -,I �
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this Report was
prepared by me or under my direct super-
vision and that I am a duly Registered
Professional Engineer under 'the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
YGit
Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
i
Date: May 3, 1984 Reg. No. 14260
Approved by:
Thomas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works •
Date:
6Jr
G. P.E.
o
01
Rn 1..
R W.
Rohn W. Ron M, P.E.
A.dr, k, P.E.
B. fd d A. 4mbn, P. E.
Rmb E. r.mr. P.E.
loon C. Ghon. P.E.
Glenn R. Cook, P.E.
A'mh A. Gmd.n
Themm E'. Nor
Rchort w.'R
Repro G. &1h ... M. P.E.
M.n. L. So b. P.E.
Lo..ld C. &Wry 1. P.E.
fmy A. Bourton, P E.
Mark A. H... P.E.
rm K. FWU. P.E.
.MRbrl T. Fnlm.nn, P.E.
Raba R. Pl�pmr. P.F.
D..d L. A... P. E.
Ch.d. A. Emkm.
L. M. P.w .
H.Mn .V. Own
Transmitted herewith is our report for Oak Cliff Pond Outlet, Project 400.
This report covers trunk storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment
roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a •
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC.
_�Ira4z a --Z', I I -,I �
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this Report was
prepared by me or under my direct super-
vision and that I am a duly Registered
Professional Engineer under 'the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
YGit
Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
i
Date: May 3, 1984 Reg. No. 14260
Approved by:
Thomas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works •
Date:
6Jr
• SCOPE: This project includes the construction of trunk storm sewer which will
provide an outlet for Oak Cliff Pond. Oak Cliff Pond is designated as Pond
AP -10 in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. Oak Cliff
Pond is located west of Slaters Road and south of Cliff Road (Co. Rd. No. 32).
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Storm Sewer Plan for the City
of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one con-
tract.
DISCUSSION: Trunk storm sewer proposed herein includes providing an outlet
for Oak Cliff Pond (AP -10). Trunk storm sewer includes a submersible lift
station located -on the south side of Oak Cliff Pond as shown on the attached
drawing. The lift station will include two 115 gallon per minute pumps at 5.0
• horsepower each. Also included is a 4" diameter force main which will convey
storm water from Pond AP -10 to Pond AP -10A. A 12" diameter gravity storm
•
sewer will convey storm water from Pond AP -LOA to an existing 24" diameter
storm sewer in Slaters Road at James Street. Pond AP -10B located directly
west of Slaters Road at James Street will discharge directly into the 12" di-
ameter gravity storm sewer from Pond AP-IOA. Access to the lift station will
be provided by constructing a 12' wide gravel drive from Slaters Road across
Outlet C. It is assumed for purposes of this report that Slaters Road will be
open cut for storm sewer construction.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
Assessment Area
Oak Cliff Addition
Outlot B, C, D, E, F
Page. 1.
0661c
64
0
COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located
at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $98,080 which
includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated
at 27.5% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Storm sewer included herein is trunk. Trunk area assessments
for storm sewer have been previously assessed under Project No. 186 for this
area. However, the assessment amount was determined at the agriculture
(single—family) rate. Since that time the zoning classifications for certain
outlots within Oak Cliff Addition have been defined under the Winkler/Jackson
Planned Unit Development Agreement. It is therefore proposed to assess those
Outlots at the 1984 rate for their present zoning less the 1984 rate for the
zoning at which they were previously assessed (agricultural). Trunk rates in
effect at the time of this report are as follows: •
Single Family $0.045/sq.ft.
Multiple Rate $0.057/sq.ft.
Commercial $0.068/sq.ft.
REVENUE: Revenue to cover the cost of this project is as follows:
Project Cost Revenue Balance
STORM SEWER
Trunk $98,080
Trunk Area Assessment $27,963
$98,080 $27,963 —$70,117
The estimated trunk fund balance is —$70,117. It is assumed this amount
will be the responsibility of the trunk storm sewer fund.
•
Page 2.
0661c
47
0
•
•
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report May 1, 1984
Public Hearing June 5, 1984
Approve Plans and Specifications June 5, 1984
Open Bids June 29, 1984
Award Contract July 3, 1984
Construction Completion Fall, 1984
Final Assessment Hearing Spring, 1985
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Spring, 1986
0661c
Page 3.
No'
APPENDIX A •
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10)
TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET
PROJECT NO. 400
500
Lin.ft.
12" RCP Storm sever in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft.
$ 13,000
2
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH v/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each
2,000
LUMP
SUM
Lift Station No. 1 @ $37,100.00/L.S.
37,100
10
Lin.ft.
MH depth greater than '8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
6,000
450
Lin.ft.
4" DIP Force main @ $10.00/lin.ft.
4,500 '
LUMP
SUM
Gravel access drive @ $3,500.00/L.S.
3,500
150
Sq.yds.
Bituminous mixture for patch @ $20.00/sq.yd.
3,000
30
Lin.ft.
Concrete curb b gutter @ $15.00/lin.ft.
450 •
2.0
Acres
Seed v/mulch b fertilizer @ $2,000.00/acre
4,000
-
Total
$73,550
+52 Contingencies
3,680
$77,230
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest
20,850
TOTAL .............................................
$98,080
1
Page 4.
0661c
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10)
TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET
PROJECT NO. 400
•
0661c
0
Page 5.
76
Assessable
Parcel
Present
Area
Credit
Area
Total
Description Zoning
(sq.ft.)
(sq.ft.)
(sq.ft.)
Rate/sq.ft.
Assessment
OAK CLIFF
ADDITION
Outlot B.
Multiple
549,600
Pond
224,000
260,480
$0.012
$ 3,125
Str.
65,120
OutIot C
Multiple
387,200
Pond
59,200
262,400
0.012
3,149
Str.
65,600
• Outlot D
Commercial
345,600
Str.
69,120
276,480
0.023
6,359
Outlot E
-Commercial
394,800
Str.
78,960
315,840
0.023
7,264
Outlot F
Commercial
438,400
Str.
87,680
350,720
0.023
8,066
TOTAL ..............................
$27,963
•
0661c
0
Page 5.
76
C. S. A. H. NO. 32
4a1�
\�S
RAVEL ACCESS ROAD
OAK CLIFF POND
AP -'10 '
N.W.L. 919.7
H.W.L. 924.0
LIFT STATION
4" FORCEMAIN
POND AP-IOA
N.W.L. 946.0
i
H.W.L. 946.7
m'
0.5 AC. FT.
I
POND AP -108
N.W.L. 945.0
JAMES ST.
H.W.L. 948.5
\2
2.0 AC. FT.
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT
® COMMERCIAL RATE
® MULTIPLE RATE
OAK CLIFF POND ( AP -10 )
TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET
SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
Q ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers •
St. Paul. Minn.
EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: MAY, 1984 F'KUJ. 1
11 Comm.49303 11 400
yellL
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Eighteen
PROJECT 398/STREETS 8 UTILITIES
C. Project 398, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Streets B Utilities)
-- On May 15, the City Council opened a public hearing to discuss
the feasibility of installing streets and utilities to service
the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition under Project 398. During that public
hearing, the developer requested that the scope of the project
be reduced from what was originally requested and anticipated
due to current market conditions. Subsequently, the City Council
continued the public hearing until June 5 and ordered the feasibil-
ity report to be revised to incorporate the scope of the project
intended to be developed under the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
Therefore, enclosed on pages _73 through _0 is a copy
of the "revised" feasibility report for Project 398 relating
to the final plat configuration previously discussed by the
City Council under the final plat application of the Consent
Agenda for the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Because this is a continua-
tion of the public hearing held on May 15 and the revised report
did not incorporate any additional properties that were not
previously included in the original report, no additional notifica-
tions were published in the legal newspaper. However, a copy
• of the revised feasibility report has been provided to the developer
for his information prior to the public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 398 for the installation of streets
and utilities for the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
•
_7z
0
REPORT
Con
SUN CLIFF 2nd ADDITION
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO.398 REVISED
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
FILE N0.49300
BmeA&042, /tOdelie, lgmd," ii 9 rgddociated, Jnc.
e :,q'e
73
Baxe�ww ��ww.�.ww u�_''I` �//����� �/�
&iewe, y'7 yQ,pC{�,(,�',Y
,B�('.
Gh R. COW. P.E.
£nlh A. Car P.E.
Y
ala G. Bonru.Oo, P.E.
.
IA0.6 NO.a. P.G
R'. R.. P.E.
R'M M'. Fawn. P.E.
Ja h C. AM1111A. P.E.
RO G. &h.wh'. P.E.
2335 W/. 7WA WVA..? 36
B.. Pm A. P.E.
M.rv,. L. SO A.. P.E.
Sl. P..r All. .-,- 55.fm
ft&M E. Turns. P.E.
D ..&C. B.,V d,. P.E.
J.m C. OLo.. P.L.
Jfny A. Bo.NO., P.L.
PA... 612.636-4600
Mm* A. H.., P.E.
TN K. F . P.E
M~ F. P.E.
RO R. fy Jfj e. P.F
Oa.E LaY O... P.E.
April 16, 1984
Ch A. Enrlan
lAa M. Po.H,IY
' Habn M. Olm.
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Mo. 55121
Re: Sun Cliff 2nd Addition
Utility b Street Improvements
Project No. 398 - Revised
File No. 49300
Dear Mayor and Council:
Transmitted herewith is our report for Sun
Cliff 2nd Addition
Utility and
Street Improvements, Project 398. This report covers
utility and
street im-
provements to service Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
•
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other
interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect
of this
report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROA, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the tate of Minnesota.
Mark A. Hanson
Date: April 16, 1984 Reg. No. 14260
Approved by
Phoma.9AC-olbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works •
Date: .j � y Y
0368c /
• SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water
main, storm sewer and streets to service the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Sun
Cliff 2nd Addition is located south of Co. Rd. 30, between Beaver Dam Road and
Blackhawk Road and includes 81 single family lots.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plan for
the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out in
one contract.
DISCUSSION:
Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes 8 inch diameter lat-
eral sanitary sewers to properly service the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
Sun Cliff 2nd Addition will be served by laterals constructed within the pro-
posed streets at a proper depth to service the abutting lots. All sewers in
• this project will connect to sewers in the Sun Cliff 1st Addition.
Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes 6 inch diameter laterals and
a 16 inch trunk water main to properly service the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addi-
•
tion. A 16 inch diameter trunk water main was constructed under Project 317
in the west boulevard of Blackhawk Road from Co. Rd. 30 to a point 1,850 feet
south of Co. Rd. 30. This trunk main would be extended to the south limits of
Sun Cliff 2nd Addition as a part of this project. Lateral water mains pro-
posed herein will connect to water mains in Sun Cliff lot Addition as well as
the previously mentioned trunk water main on Blackhawk Road. Also included
are the required number of valves and hydrants.
Services - Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed 15
feet beyond the property line. Service lines are proposed to be 4 inch diame-
ter for sanitary sewer and 1 inch diameter for water.
Page 1.
0368c
%S
Storm Sewer - The storm sewer holding pond' designated as Pond AP -7 is located •
at the northeast corner of future Suri Cliff Additions. It is proposed to ex-
tend an 18 inch diameter storm sewer from the Sun Cliff 1st Addition through
the 2nd Addition. This storm sewer will serve portions of the 2ndAddition
and will be extended to provide an outlet to Pond AP -7 when future Sun Cliff
Additions are developed. Also included is a lateral storm sewer which will
convey drainage from Fox Ridge Court to Pond AP -23. The outlet for Pond AP -23
will be constructed by Mn/DOT as part of I -35E to an existing storm sewer in
Rahn Road.
Street - Street construction proposed herein includes construction of a 32
foot wide street constructed to a 7 ton residential design thickness'with sur-
mountable concrete 'curb and gutter in conjunction with the required restora-
tion for boulevards. It is assumed that grading of the streets will be done
by the developer prior to the start of this project. •
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA
N 1/2 SECTION 29
Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Parcel 014-28)
Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Parcel 012-09)
COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located
at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows:
Sanitary Sever $ 85,860
Water Main 120,270
Services 68,850
Storm Sever 41,310
Street 177,390
TOTAL ............. $493,680 •
Page 2.
0368c
76
The total estimated project cost is $493,680 which includes contingencies
• and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 27% and include
legal, engineering, administration and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re-
port in Appendix B. Trunk area sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer
have been previously assessed to this area as a part of Project 236.
SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the cost of the new lateral sanitary
severs for this project equally to all the lots in the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
WATER MAIN: Water main proposed herein is separated into trunk and lateral
water main. It is proposed to assess a lateral benefit from trunk for half
the length of the 16 inch trunk water main along Blackhawk Road. The remain-
ing costs associated with the 16 inch trunk main will be the responsibility of
• the trunk fund. It is proposed to assess the cost of the lateral water main
and the lateral benefit from the trunk main equally to all the lots in Sun
•
Cliff 2nd Addition.
SERVICES: It is proposed that all services be 4 inch sever and 1 inch water
services and that they extend 15 feet into the property. It is proposed to
assess the total cost of the services equally to all the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd
Addition.
STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the cost of the new lateral storm sewer
equally to all the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
STREET: Street construction proposed herein is to be assessed equally to all
the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. Trunk rates in
effect at the time of this report are as follows:
0368c
Page 3.
77
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK
Lateral benefit from a trunk water main ......... $21.68 centerline ft.
REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as
follows:
A.) SANITARY SEWER
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
8.) WATER MAIN.
Lateral
Trunk
Lateral Assessment
Lateral Benefit from Trunk
C.) SERVICES
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
D.) STORM SEWER
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
Project
Cost
$ 85,860
$ 85,860
$ 82,698
37,572
$ 68,850
$ 68,850
$ 41,310
Page 4.
0368c
79
Revenue Balance
$ 85,860
$ 85,860 - 0 -
$ 82,698
4,762
$ 87,460 -$32,810
$ 68,850
$ 68,850
$ 41,310
$ 41,310
- 0 -
0
•
•
E.) STREET
• Lateral
Lateral Assessment
•
•
$177,390
$177,390
$177,390 $177,390 - 0 -
TOTAL ................ -$32,810
The total estimated trunk fund balance for this project is -$32,810 which
will be the responsibility of the trunk water fund.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report June 5, 1984
Public Hearing. . June 5, 1984
Approve Plans and Specifications June 5, 1984
Open Bids July 2, 198,+
Award Contract July 3, 1984
Construction Completion Fall, 1984
Final Assessment Hearing Winter, 1985
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1986
0368c
Page 5.
79
B.) WATER MAIN
900
Lin.ft.
APPENDIX A
$ 23,400
3,800
•
6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $11.00/lin.ft.
41,800
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
Each
Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each
6,300
1
Each
SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION
1,800
10
Each
Resilient wedge gate valve b box in pl, @ $350.00/ea,
3,500
PROJECT NO. 398
Lbs.
Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb.
5,200
A.) SANITARY SEWER
Each
Connect to Ex. 16" DIP @ $400.00/each
400
3,000
Lin.ft.
8" PVC Sanitary sewer, 10'-15' dp, in pl, @ $13.00/l.f.
$
39,000
Cu.yds.
14
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
Lin.ft.
12,600
4,700
50
Lin.ft.
MH depth greater than 8' dp, in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
$ 90,190
3,000
4
Lin.ft.
Outside drop for MH in pl. @ S150.00/lin.ft.
600
$ 94,700
30
Lin.ft.
4" CISP Service riser in pl. @ $10.00/lin.ft.
25,570 •
300
84
Each
8"x4" wye in pl. @ $40.00/each
3,360
222.5
Cu.yds.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
2,225
3,000
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
3,000
1
Each
Connect to existing MH @ $300.00/each
300
Total
$
64,385
+5X Contingencies
3,220
$
67,605
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest
18,255
•
A.) TOTAL SANITARY SEWER .............................
$
85,860
B.) WATER MAIN
900
Lin.ft.
16" DIP Water main in pl. @ $26.00/lin,ft.
$ 23,400
3,800
Lin.ft.
6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $11.00/lin.ft.
41,800
7
Each
Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each
6,300
1
Each
16" Butterfly valve 6 box in pl, @ $1,800.00/each
1,800
10
Each
Resilient wedge gate valve b box in pl, @ $350.00/ea,
3,500
4,000
Lbs.
Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb.
5,200
1
Each
Connect to Ex. 16" DIP @ $400.00/each
400
2
Each
Connect to Ex. 6" DIP @ $300.00/each
600
249
Cu.yds.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
2,490
4,700
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
4,700
Total
$ 90,190
+52 Contingencies
4,510
$ 94,700
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest
25,570 •
B.) TOTAL WATER MAIN ................................
$120,270
Page 6.
0368c
• 5.) SERVICES
3,600 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer service in pl. @ $6.00/lin.ft.
3,600 Lin.ft. 1" Type "K" copper water service in pl. @ $5.10/L.f.
82 Each 1" Corporation stop in pl. @ $20.00/each
82 Each 1" Curb atop b box in pl. @ $70.00/each
4,290 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
Total
+5% Contingencies
•
•
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
C.) TOTAL SERVICES .................................
D.) STORM SEWER
650 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-15' dp. in pl. @ $26.00/1.£.
260 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp, in pl. @ $19.00/lin.ft.
3 Each Std. 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. in pl. @ $950.00/each
2 Each CB w/cstg. in pl. @ $800.00/each
20 Lin.ft. MH Depth greater than 8' dp. in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
1 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard in pl. @ $540.00/ea. .
4 Cu.yds. Rip rap in pl. @ $50.00/cu.yd.
84 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
910 .Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
1 Acres Seed with mulch in pl. @ $1,000.00/Ac.
0368c
Total
+5% Contingencies
$ 21,600
18,360
1,640
5,740
4.290
$ 51,630
2,580
$ 54,210
14.640
$ 68,850
$ 16,900
4,940
2,850
1,600
1,200
540
200
840
910
1,000
S 30,980
1,550
$ 32,530
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 8,780
D.) TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................ $ 41,310
Page 7.
I
E.) STREET
TOTAL
•
1,200
Cu.yda.
Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd.
$ 3,600
600
Cu.yds.
Select Granular borrow @ $4.50/cu.yd.
2,700
13,960
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation @ $0.25/sq.yd.
3,490
4,600
Tons
Cl. 5 100% crushed quarry rock in pl. @ $7.00/ton
32,200
1,150
Tons
2331 Bituminous base course in pl. @ $11.00/ton
12,650
1,150
Tons
2341 Bituminous wear course in pl. @ $12.00/ton
13,800
130
Tons
Bituminous material for mixture in pl. @ $200.00/ton
26,000
600
Gals.
Bituminous material for tack coat in pl. @ $1.20/gal.
720
6,900
Lin.ft.
Surmoutable concrete curb and gutter in pl. @ $4.50/l.f. 31,050
1,860
Lin.ft.
Reinforcing for concrete C. b G. in pl. @ $1.00/l.f.
1,860
18
Each
Adjust MH or CB frame @ $120:00/each
2,160
8
Each
Adjust GV box @ $100.00/each
800
2
Acres
Seed w/mulch in pl. @ $1,000.00/Ac.
2,000
Total
$133,030
+5% Contingencies
6,650
$139,680
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest
37,710 •
E.) TOTAL STREET ................................... ..$177,390
0368c
A.
TOTAL
SANITARY SEWER
$ 85,860
B.
TOTAL
WATER MAIN
I
120,270
C.
TOTAL
SERVICES .
68,850
D.
TOTAL
STORM SEWER
41;310
E.
TOTAL
STREET
177,390
TOTAL ...................
$493,680
Page 8.
�'v2'
•
APPENDIX B
• PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION
PROJECT NO. 398
A. SANITARY•SEWER
u
Page 9.
0368c
�3
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
N 1/2, SECTION
29
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
23
$1,060
$ 24,380
Block 2, Lots
1-12
12
'$1,060
12,720
Block 3, Lots
1-19
19
$1,060
20,140
Block 4, Lots
1 6 2
2
$1,060
2,120
Block 5, Lot 1
1
$1,060
1,060
Block 6, Lots
1-24
24
$1,060
25,440
TOTAL
81
$ 85,860
B. WATER MAIN
•
No, of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
1) LATERALS
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
23
$1,021
$ 23,482
Block 2, Lots
1-12
12
$1,021
12,252
Block 3, Lots
1-19
19
$1,021
19,398
Block 4, Lots
1 & 2
2
$1,021
2,042
Block 5, Lot 1
1
$1,021
1,021
Block 6, Lots
1-24
24
$1,021
24,503
TOTAL
148
(1) $ 82,698
u
Page 9.
0368c
�3
2) LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK (439.33' @ $10.84/FF - $4,762)
C. SERVICES
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
SUN CLIFF
2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
Block
1,
Lots
1-23
23
$59
'$1,352
Block
2,
Lots
1-12
12
$59
706
Block
3,
Lots
1-19
19
$59
1,117
Block
4,
Lots
1 6 2
2
$59
118
Block
5,
Lots
1
1
$59
59
Block
6,
Lots
1-24
24
$59
1,410
81
$4,762
C. SERVICES
Page 10.
0368c /
�f
E
•
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
23
$850
$
19,550
Block 2, Lots
1-12
12
$850
10,200
Block 3, Lots
1-19
19
$850
16,150
Block 4, Lots
1 & 2
2
$850
1,700
Block 5, Lots
1
1
$850
850
Block 6, Lots
1-24
24
$850
20,400
TOTAL
148
.$
68,850
D. STORM SEWER
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
23
$510
$
11,730
Block 2, Lots
1-12
12
$510
6,120
Block 3, Lots
1-19
19
$510
9,690
Block 4, Lots
1 6 2
2
$510
1,020
Block 5, Lots
1
1
$510
510
Block 6, Lots
1-24
24
$510
12,240
TOTAL
81
$
41,310
Page 10.
0368c /
�f
E
•
•
E. STREET
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
23
$2,190
$ 50,370
Block 2, Lots
1-12
12
$2,190
26,280
Block 3, Lots
1-19
19
$2,190
41,610
Block 4, Lots
1 6 2
2
$2,190
4,380
Block 5, Lots
1
1
$2,190
2,190
Block 6, Lots
1-24
24
$2,190
52,560
TOTAL
81
$177,390
•
0368c
Page 11.
P5
PROJECT 398 - REVISED
SUMMARY
COST/LOT
0368c
Page 12.
0
•
Sanitary
Lateral Ben-
Storm,
Legal
Sever
Water
efit from
Sever
Total
Description
Lateral
Lateral
Water Main
Services
Lateral
Street
Cost/Lot
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block
1,
Lots
1-23
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,690
Block
2,
Lots
1-12
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,690
Block
3,
Lots
1-19
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,690
Block
4,
Lots
1 & 2
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,690
Block
5,
Lots
1
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,690
Block
6,
Lots
1-24
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,60
0368c
Page 12.
0
•
C,
SUN C1 F -F 2nd ADDITION
UTUITY s &THEM UAPROvwcmm
PROJMT NOZ98 REVISED
EAGA_N, MUTNESOTA
SANITARY SEWER
a
Nil . .., 2" ,...
cor w .9300
i
I
//I
Nil . .., 2" ,...
cor w .9300
® LATERAL BENEFIT
FROM TRUNK
SUN CLIFF 2nd ADDITION
UTUJTT • STPAW ntmvntwra
PROD= No.m RMww
RAGAN, MINNESOTA
WATER MAIN
Dl�! Y� il• �� �.
GD' no -9i00
L
•
0
0
0
9
SUN CLIFF tad ADDITION
l Tu2rT k mm MIROVtMMM
PROJBUT MOMS REVISED
FAGAN, MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER
�r �a mss■ • NmL OL i
i
pit[ ". [., .9[•
EOr� W 1[]00
MUINEWTA
STREETS
•
W"- w B. l...
ms .0. ""a
0
II •
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Nineteen
•
•
VACATE UTILITY EASEMENT/LAKESIDE ESTATES
D. Vacate Utility Easement, Lakeside Estates -- On May 1, the
City Council received a petition for the vacation of a drainage
and utility easement over Lots 3 and 13, Block 1, Lakeside Estates,
and subsequently scheduled a public hearing to be held on June
5. Enclosed on page is a location map referencing the
utility easements to be vacated. As can be seen, these utility
easements are centered down the referenced lots due to the previous
lot split which has since been rescinded and these lots have
now reverted to their original configuration. Notification
of this drainage and utility easement vacation has been published
in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected
private utility companies. As of this date, the staff has not
received any objection to this proposed vacation.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED -ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny. the vacation of drainage and utility easements
over Lots 3 and 13, Block 1, Lakeside Estates.
9/
' .. - - fes.. t . �! T --: r•.-� �{•� � '6..^ •i��
(�. .a4trs �� at•te ♦.. wo i
PART
OF
�A��•: .Cl. •
_ PART OF 010-82 �. b010'62 �' \ -•r -.. a
PO My d Ealoo
PARK
Iw• rm ma., ..ew1 010-00 ,a
PROPOSED VAC TIONS _9_ •'�j',I1011IslillgsI,'
e,
dw
� _ ■ ro �`F� _ � dry 4 4 •: ,
t a •ae. �� r • b
• bxr • neo S a � f'
' ATLAN7 •ran _ ,•. \ V ' e�•.w, •i' ` •I f -0 a•
£MILL '•e to 1• .. 11 `
(� w�b ORIV •.w rb • r!a •/•'Z`\ •d y' d..
' •' _,� ✓` E b All�4IsI,, Iwo
•Nj °° ni' Nom/ ''y"�¢ • dr ~• Coy
c • m ree ajO - • 10 +F' my : we. • _ i �YV• 4
t _
1 $' • G9
all
-� • t .w wo 'm S,U : 1• 8 If .'? �- O}n5 �•. to L. n., .j .:..�:
\r �_ 41 • ••°ertr. J •W rm •b r•r • • 8 •.a• . m•u.i .a ! :I8
d !1 p n
Is
Is
Is
Is
ONO ati _ � • �� '`��
b Iwo
020-00'Pp•� •'a_•, "'m-�.` t
♦: - \ � � � pP�• u:•'- :. .,:_ a a_ w:V?•:' Y - .r.
Q120-011 " ;4 NORTH ant GREENLEAF ^ro
��d woo e•an 6 ti ' ♦h
1 s v Qi 1 noo uao to re •-1111,
u.n
atb Q r ��oz
•S. r•• ♦.
SRM y$ o E w•
F q _ ; 13D-01 0 �. �. i
.zw
6W _
it
O b-' • _ • • Y Q N m •
N g• LO 1� ! ;S =_
-
Agenda Information
June 5, 1984, City
• Page Twenty
Memo
Council Meeting
VACATE STREET EASEMENT/TWIN VIEW MANOR 2ND ADDITION
E. Vacate Street Easement, Twin View Manor 2nd Addition --
When the Twin View Manor 2nd Addition was developed, Richard's
Court did not have access to Cliff Road by way of Thomas Lane
which was to be platted as a part of the Walden Heights lst
Addition. Subsequently, as a part of the development agreement,
the City required the developer to install a temporary road
access from Richard's Court out to Cliff Road across a street
easement over the west 50 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Twin View Manor
2nd Addition. With the subsequent platting of Walden Heights
lst Addition and the construction of Thomas Lane and a portion
of Richard's Court during 1983, this street easement is no longer
necessary. Therefore, the staff initiated the public hearing
to vacate this street easement so that the developer can remove
the temporary access road and develop the lot in its platted
residential manner. All notices of this public hearing have
been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially
affected public and private utilities. Due to the fact that
there are existing public and private utilities within this
area, it is recommended that the vacation be approved for street
access only and that all public utility and dr inage easements
• be retained as necessary. Enclosed on page 4!is a location
map showing the street easement vacation to be considered at
this public hearing.
•
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny the vacation of a street easement over Lot
1, Block 1, Twin View Manor 2nd Addition.
,�3
61 !' OZ >
a
P\.vdct�.m I g�e� 'j I IZ
81�Jpor-';I (i`T plL15^
LI
N II
f O i _ — _ _ — — —
SZ ZI gl 14 - . •`OY Ql l CItY of .
is .7 r 18 B: L. .
L__••Sd._.11: WALDEN E
HEIGHTS °°°" 1
:.�....•�.,�. RK
.�Oy,wIS_-••ee w,1� men—
'tY--':i:�y' r-•;oo.S• •C;I . a'^'� 'mm 1 bam� 1�- II
',w•i°rry ie 6�iY a-`� 1 C51_ •I e
•iu1 N \ DI �' Gci) kir •.eat__ •vow (\ I1" E;Y I �, Ij '�� dIS6
0 A 3AItl0 r iv^ •'' ( kn} r-` •., g 5
S
rT•- �._ }l 11 0. v / I I � I r, � Y\ .\ I a B �F� � q
Y f j@tiR1 rY&'�1/I+�1W.v• p.?a°j 1` 11 11 �8 a y\' 6 i/� I II gI1I \la �1�0. �' n \'9 �•i)' �l•_� a •- J •�'2 i.
SII .�rrri'• 91 p.j3 I� 1 91
9 JIxLy� -JIB x114 t;\ b I`N,y) p _ /J•�'�{a�'N.'
I1� •�� /•,6 Itlw � '� 4d� � f„r:,e�� "'hb"( a�;+•�!�" �II rna•d.Iwd-4r�'J:�'9, / 1 116,,.��
�` I✓r�_ _ I' II f1 II 11 I1 ♦l;+• tyvi� \i _Ji._mulfregla°�l._ Y�f �.r'N� ,a -�•T 7.__e1 r�.,b
s•rJ �. svi• _ J I_ aa�1 J 1-- � J ew 1 � . 6 � �•a �•-.� r. •�T /gv r on�rpj I ` °i; � 8r q
rm wn :. rw iam'. nmdao 'uao __r '44d ..i—�. ter: s�••'.. G .1 / ) J a b��C
rm .. 00 ,:.J •�� . f ', i n• tl wr � i y a'( �>%P ("EOia \II / I.. ' 1• •s {Ir7� -�tpi4Ko� — IT •-I
',. �_ Y IQ\N��.� N p N 1•,r ' 1.� 4 1 8 ♦�� 8 � i•4tyLvl rw�-lf mw -1 P�•"adol��lai'0'\`\ Z +�\.1r�I,�� q {�_ Gaaya 1i�� �1
F • -d 8 N • .R W • �8 A 1 I OI N fosm
N Y ✓ ., dG L Ig 1 a£af � I w'•751#d •IN CD.0 rBCI IY S b l_�P_o8�1111 I ° �Y ��\.•^n// II 71\ /Iti`~�Iron I I' nm •arr 7rl _ JL L evl J8_ ZOT
D a
'• RICHA LANE 1 --e ro'ri •ee w- 1° _ • m• •1q
-.0 u n rr•ro' em u• w n•
1w 1.. Iar • 2 `l
. � __ /-[y`/--'rii r• — AI$ '11�'/��(+_y I"
9 e C O
d d
n e , �_ D • V C..•..,_7^maw mid O�
.i ,oro
�L. r •eW fv t l >1
%'6 •rte @'LY
a 99v m. • 1; •ruuS � + 4 ` r '. Ot i /Y •W.M •'iy��� 4 n r a
.iJ`• n ii1L %.tear d O • � ,A � qaJ d SF a • Y I
w•r• q salts 8Lv ! ,
ERIK'S BOULEV4RD r �".• , „r.O ,,, .,
W SyY sdoii�� W B r
ie...•'7. rl i•iia• I2Z
-Ton ...j = rwpa.a• . / . _ @ to
N •� w �WN 6 Wr
mn 4 ; •am
•r Nit, •- aw• t •i
3; CO. RD
y
en i� n•n-"°
ur eeo
11n
sae.
ro
uo
m
O
O
a
O
0o
w
•�
-
"u IS
• u
E
n.
1
I
1.
e••
up
1m
1m
NO. s,� 31 (PILOT "Iwoe RD 1 \
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Twenty-One
•
REZONING/DRENCKHAHN
A. Alan J. and Baerbel C. Drenckhahn for Rezoning from A to
RB Consisting of Approximately .68 Acres -- A public hearing
was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting
held on May 29, 1984, to consider two applications as submitted
by Alan J. and Baerbel C. Drenckhahn. The first application
consisted of a rezoning to change the land use from an Agricultural
to a Roadside Business classification and the second application
was for a preliminary plat containing one (1) commercial lot.
The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of
the rezoning subject to the beauty parlor use, and the import
business only being allowed for a three-year term and that the
existing facility could not be expanded until utilities and platting
have been applied for. A motion was therefore granted to waive
the platting requirements at this time noting there is an existing
building on the lot and that future use would include the expansion
or addition of land to the north and to allow construction of
a fully authentic German restaurant. Enclosed on pages
through /a 6 is a copy of the City Planner's report
• regarding these applications. Also enclosed is a copy of the
minutes of the Advisory Planning Commission meeting, found on
page (s) /07 -.f' /O 7:t-
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
rezoning from A to RB and to approve or deny the waiver of platting
requirements for the Drenckhahn property.
E
95
•
J
•
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT 8 REZONING TO RB
(ROADSIDE BUSINESS)
APPLICANT: ALAN J. 8 BAERBEL C. DRENCKHAHN
LOCATION: PART OF THE SEi OF THE NEi OF SECTION 4
EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 29, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22, 1984
REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting
preliminary plat approval and rezoning for approximately .68 acres
located west of Pilot Knob Road and south of 494.
ZONING AND LAND USE
Presently the parcel is zoned A (Agricultural) and would not allow
any further development until the property was rezoned. The Compre-
hensive Guide designates this parcel as RB (Roadside Business
District) which would allow development in accordance with freeway
access and service to the transient population. The applicant is
proposing to zone in accordance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan
and requests a zoning of RB (Roadside Business) for this particular
parcel.
COMMENTS
The applicant is proposing to remodel the 1,354 square foot struc-
ture into a gift shop and hair salon. The proposed plan conforms
to the setback, parking and lot coverage requirements of the City
Code. The applicant is presently operating a beauty parlor as a
home occupation. This business would relocate to the proposed new
location.
The main issue seems to be whether or not the proposed use is
compatible with the RB designation being applied for. The Drenck-
hahn's long range plan would include the acquisition and rezoning
to RB of the land north of the subject parcel for construction of
a German restaurant. If this is accomplished, the RB zoning would
be contiguous and conforming to the Land Use Guide Plan designation.
If approved the plat should be subject to the following conditions:
1) The plat be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's
review since it abuts a county road.
2) The plan be submitted to the City Engineering Department
for approval of the drainage and grading alterations.
94
0
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
ALAN J. & BAERBEL DRENCKHAHN
MAY 29, 1984
PAGE 2.
3) An appropriate bond be obtained to insure conformance with
the landscaping plan.
4) All other City ordinances shall be adhered to.
97
•
•
E
IN..FOR
t-1 'OT, •
J ` +
358
358'
-NIn-
11 1 PPI`PFN'IV _[W P114Q •'
�m
1
_ I
it j(wjFl4*,k 4r s' J
v
0
0
cr
•
a;w YY
ud..
-NIn-
11 1 PPI`PFN'IV _[W P114Q •'
�m
1
_ I
it j(wjFl4*,k 4r s' J
v
0
0
cr
j/.•moi '�r�''""i{•--- - -
*LOST SPUR
/ COUNTRY
CLUB
PF
_•may � ..,,..y � �Q �
in do i / - [VALLEY I i
I - ®-
R-1
R-1
11
r_i
LB R
. RLI
TREF LE (ACRE5-1
/ o {UNDII1 I �A I I I1
'a I I I I
-4I R-4
-il R-4
t.-2
IV I L- , •o L/ v i 1-I n r
J
77-- N MM- 808- 2
- 10
• " � TIN T VJ*#LH
GB
��
`��4%.
Mrawfill
ME
L,gn rr —
PF
u
a
10,
N
A
PrA
W
n
%DDI1
NB
NNW
L
/r
/
Ga
.6 .... !Y.RB
Ind
1 ' • ..., riQ_. - / •r ..: s.� p Ind„
PL
�-
.. • '%-- _ .� ..
Ina
.*'--�• �7 :,_��..'�f�,j�(.�g� '.._.----
fl
GE
6ROSEMOUNQ�_
a_
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
• C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
FROM: RICHARD M. HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
DATE: MAY 25, 1984
SUBJECT: DRENCKHAHN PRELIMINARY PLAT
The Engineering Division of the Department of Public Works has
the following comments concerning this proposed development for
consideration by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council.
GRADING/DRAINAGE
A detailed grading plan will be required indicating how storm
water run-off from the parking area will be handled.
UTILITIES
Existing utilities capable of providing service to this proposed
development consists of only a 12" trunk watermain located along
the the westside of Pilot Knob Road. However, this proposed
development lies within the N -J sanitary sewer sub -district as
depicted in Figure 1. At this time, there are no lateral sanitary
sewer mains in this sub -district. The closest sanitary sewer
• to this proposed development is located approximately 300 feet
east of Pilot Knob Road in Corporate Center Drive (Old Eagan
Industrial Road). This is approximately 500 feet from this proposed
development. Although preliminary review by staff indicates
the sewer is deep enough in this location, it would not be feasible
to extend this sewer any further west due to the fact that existing
pavement would have to be removed and replaced and it would not
be enough room without obtaining an easement or removing and
replacing the bituminous pathway along the westside of Pilot
Knob Road to install a sewer line to service this parcel. Besides,
the amount of area which could be served by this sewer would
be limited since the land in this area generally slopes to the
west. Therefore, it would appear to be more appropriate to service
sub -district N -J from laterals from the trunk sanitary sewer
located within this sub -district.
Servicing this proposed development with sanitary sewer at this
time may not be all that appropriate when one considers the immedi-
ate proposed use being for a beauty salon and gift shop. However,
it would be imperative that sanitary sewer be available if and
when this proposed development includes the restaurant facility
which was mentioned at the previous Planning Commission meeting
by the applicants.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY
• A fifty -foot public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for
Pilot Knob Road as a condition of this plat. In addition, a
ten -foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all
publicly dedicated right-of-way with a five-foot utility and
/0/
I
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 24, 1984
PAGE TWO •
drainage easement being dedicated adjacent to all exterior lot
lines.
ASSESSMENTS
As a condition of final platting, this development shall be respon-
sible for trunk area storm sewer and lateral benefit from trunk
watermain. In addition to the above assessments which would
be determined at the commercial rate, the water area assessment
must be upgraded from residential to commercial. All assessment
rates will be the rates which are in effect at the time of final
platting.
At this time, the above assessments would amount to the following:
Water Area - .578 Acres X $2,830 per acre = $1,662 - $150
(1972 Single Family Rate Assessed) = $1,512
Trunk Area .Storm Sewer - 25,560 Square Feet X $.068 per
square foot = $1,738
Lateral Benefit From Trunk Water - 83 Feet X $17.87 per
front foot = $1,483 •
I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report with
the Advisory Planning Commission at their meeting of May 29,
1984.
Respectfully sub fitted,
Richard M. Hef P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS
I) A detailed grading & drainage plan shall be submitted for
approval by Staff.
2) A 50' public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot
Knob Road, along with easements as referenced in this report.
3) This development shall be responsible for trunk water and storm
sewer area assessments and lateral benefit from trunk watermain
at the rates in effect at final platting.
•
s. MENDOTA \ 'HTS
• :� - North \ ,
Flnterceptor
\
GUN CLV9 _ , —:v. ` 5 N -L'. \\ \\:� •.
v 3U"- ♦ �•
_LaE _ - /.'.�.�---ppv.L//r��..LL �J a
SU �CT� F71 CSL
/ Qi
N=H N -N - \�/ f —� I!S' `I♦
1 36'L Lu TPrrrLE]CP-G I �r , ' /. / ♦�
ihl h$rPrSt W.HK -O[I
83
36"�= �i N -G / — 15"
I� _ •� 112" N -P
��• I fir"
12" d I. �I / I I
15 N-0
/®-
I
/ C -C --I 1
1 •_// N -E
-B 1 P N - V N -U
I
/. -
26 30" r— ------- I 12°
_ 7C7D rat
I12It sop
rktiww;
;`m
acres .
.d,• / 12' 12'• .`�c, �� 1
5 C-00
C -NN ;
29 ;�LAKE-
�a6
�_�s- ` 33 _Ti■■ ■\/t1� n: .. — _�'S�(j�� _ _ 112" OLCCK�441 V^� ` / • M ET ,.1
---
S W� c•
C
,
r
APC AFTERNOON AFTER
• May 29, 1984
The following is a brief account of what transpired at the May 29,
1984, Advisory Planning Commission meeting.
OLD BUSINESS
A. ALAN J. AND BAERBEL C. DRAENCKHAHN, for rezoning A (Agricul-
tural) to RB (Roadside Business) consisting of approximately
.68 acres and Preliminary Plat also of consisting of the
.68 acres and containing one (1) commercial lot. In part
of the SE; of the NE;, Section 4 west of Pilot Knob Road.
Discussion and Action
Advisory Planning Commission noted that this item has been on the
agenda for several meetings and that the applicants have now submit-
ted a request to plot the property along with the original request
to rezone from Agricultural to Roadside Business. The Planning
Commission reviewed this particular item in two parts. First the
proposed zoning request, noting that the applicants are proposing
to rezone in accordance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. However,
the uses may not specifically fit the RB zoning at this time but
thatin the long range goal the Draenckhahns are proposing, would
be consistent with RB or Roadside Business zoning. After a lengthy
• discussion regarding the use of the property on a tentative basis
the Commission then reviewed the Preliminary Plat noting with this
plat request there will be direct access off of Pilot Knob Road.
Also, there is a surface road provided to the north which would
probably provide access to the westerly portion of the lot and re-
move the direct access from Pilot Knob Road. The Commission noted
that this is hopefully the long range plan and should be reviewed
by the Engineering Department. The Commission also noted that this
is also the direction or the location in which this particular
parcel would have accessibility to utilities in the area. After
discussing the platting versus waiving the plat and the uses propos-
ed, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning
subject to the beauty parlor use and import business only being
allowed for a three year term and that the existing facility could
not be expanded until utilities and platting has been applied for.
This motion was approved unanimously by the Planning Commission.
The second motion was to waive the platting requirements at this
particular time noting that there is an existing building on the
lot and that future use would include the expansion or addition
of land to the north and a use of a full authentic German restaurant.
Noting that other activity is occuring within the general area,
that platting may not be too far in the future, the Commission waiv-
ed this request with a condition that the applicant provide or meet
the conditions set forth in the May 22, 1984 Staff Report. This
item has been scheduled for the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting
• for Council consideration.
/0 7Z
Advisory Planning Commission
Afternoon After - May 29, 1984
Page Two
B. SIENNA CORPORATION (ROD HARDY), for Preliminary Plat, Birch
Park Addition consisting of approximately 43 acres and con-
taining 73 single family lots. Located in Outlots B, C,
D, and F Windcrest Second Addition.
Discussion and Action
r ,
E
Advisory Planning Commission noted that this item had been continued
from the April 24, 1984, Advisory Planning Commission, in order
to get background information from the original platting which oc-
cured in 1979. The Commission also had requested that Staff look
at the accesses onto Deerwood Drive and how many access points Birch
Park Addition would have. The applicants had revised their original
plat and reduced four lots on Deerwood Drive, which would have 200
feet of frontage and would be more consistent with the lot sizes
that presently exist along Deerwood Drive. with these revisions,
The Planning Commission again reviewed this Preliminary Plat noting
that.the applicant had made revisions and tried to incorporate the
concerns of the Surrounding neighbors. The biggest issue that was
discussed in regard to this revised plat, is the Fawn Ridge street
which would be eliminated with this revised plat. As you recall,
Fawn Ridge Street provided an access to a property to the west which
topographically would have been hard to service from Pilot Knob •
Road. The applicant also indicated that the feasibility or the
cost of this road was excessive and preferred not to provide this
street connection. After substantial review and input from the
surrounding neighbors, the Advisory Planning Commission recommended
approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to the conditions of the
Staff Report with the addition that driveway accesses to the lots
on Deerwood Drive be reviewed and approved by City Staff in order
to provide the best access in regard to topography and vegetation.
Also, the Planning Commission recommended that the conditions of
the original planned development initiated in 1979 also be adhered
to with this revision to the Preliminary Plat. Also, that adequate
storm sewer easement be obtained by this development in order to
provide proper drainage across the McCarthy property. This item was
originally scheduled for the June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
for Council consideration, however, the applicant is requesting
that this item be placed on the June 19, 1984, City Council Meeting
for Council consideration. Therefore, note this particular chage
and request by the applicant.
C. SIENNA CORPORATION (ROD HARDY), FOR Preliminary Plat Pilot
Pointe consisting of approximately 8.8 acres and containing
20 single family lots, locted in part of the NW; of Section
22, east of Pilot Knob Road.
Discussion and Action
The Advisory Planning Commission reviewed the Preliminary Plat Pilot •
Pointe noting that this particular plat was the parcel which
/0 "5r
•
•
•
Advisory Planning
Afternoon After -
Page Three
Commission Meeting
May 29, 1984
access to be provided to from Birch Park Addition, therefore, the
approval of Birch Park Addition with the elimination of Fawn Ridge
Drive allowed for the cul-de-sac to be provided from Pilot Knob
Road. The Preliminary Plat consists of 8.8 acres and the applicant
is proposing to plat 20 single family lots all which meet or exceed
the R-1 residential single district zoning requirements. Access
to these lots would be from a cul-de-sac off of Pilot Knob Road.
the main reason this particular plat is in at this time, is in
conjunction with I -35E construction. This particular development
is contingent on obtaining approximately 250,000 cubic feet of fill
in order to obtain the proper grades to provide proper access to
this development. After a great deal of discussion and input from
the surrounding neighbors, the Advisory Planning Commission did
recommend approval of this particular plat contingent on the condi-
tions in the Staff Report. Also, with the addition that storm drain-
age easements be obtained from the McCarthy property in order that
the proper storm drainage and ponding areas can be obtained to
handle the runoff from this development. The Commission also sug-
gested that condition #4 of the Engineering Report be eliminated
and that the north/south access easement be allowed as proposed
by the developer. With these changes, the application has been
scheduled for the June 19, 1984, City Council Agenda for Council
consideration.
D. Mr. Hall then brought up that he had received a request from
Federal Land for the Commission to hold a special Public Hearing
in order that Federal Lane could obtain the shortest possible pro-
cessing time the schedule could allow. Federal Lan had requested
that a special Planning Commission meeting be held on June 18, in
order that they could save two weeks in the processing of their
particular request. The Planning Commission reviewed this request
noting that they have not held a special Public Hearing or special
meeting to review development proposals in the past and that this
particular request is not any different then the requests that they
have received in the past and elected not to hold a special meeting
in order to process this application. With that the Commission
recommended they be placed on the regular schedule and be processed
in accordance with the policies and procedures of the City.
E. Dale Runkle introduced Mr. Greg Ingraham who has been hired
recently in a fulltime position in the Planning Department for the
City. Mr. Runkle had indicated that with an additional person in
the Planning Department we will then be able to start to update
studies and reports to obtain up-to-date figures and up -date
portions of the Comprehensive Plan where these figures and numbers
were gathered 5 years ago. The City will also be using John Voss
also to help provide the information in order to update this
material. There being no further business, the Planning Commission
meeting adjourned approximately 9:30 p.m.
166
APC Minutes
May 29, 1984 •
ALAE DRAENC®AHN - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAY
The public hearings regarding the application of Alan J. Draenckhahn and
Baerbel Draenckhahn for rezoning from A (Agricultural) to RB (Roadside Busi-
ness) and for preliminary plat approval of approximately 6.68 acres in part of
the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 4 on the west side
of Pilot Knob Road was convened by Chairman Hall. Dale Runkle, City Planner,
detailed the two applications, noting that the property is zoned Agricultural
and the Comprehensive Guide designates the parcel as RB (Roadside Business
District). The proposal by the applicants is to remodel the 1,354 square foot
structure into a gift shop and hair salon with possible restaurant to be
constructed in the future.
The main issue concerned whether or not the proposed use is compatible
with the RB designation, noting the land north of the parcel was intended to
be purchased by the applicants. Mr. & Mrs. Draenckhahn were present and
questions were raised by Planning Commission members, including whether the
real estate tax value would increase because of the preliminary plat versus a
waiver of plat. The proposal by the Draenckhahns at the present was to apply •
for waiver of plat, rather than the final plat, noting that the parcel is
intended to be expanded in the future. Mr. Runkle stated that the plat could
be required at the time the restaurant is applied for. Member Wold was
concerned about the RB zoning for gift shop and hair salon, noting that it may
not be appropriate in RB zoned areas, according to the Ordinance. There were
no objections from neighboring property owners and the Draenckhahns indicated
they did not expect signage would be necessary along Pilot Knob Road.
The planning commission members generally felt the application was prema-
ture for platting because a curb out may not be appropriate if the service
road is extended in the future. After considerable discussion, Hall moved,
Krob seconded the motion to recommend rezoning to RB on a conditional basis
for the two uses, including hair salon and gift shop as applied for by the
applicant for a maximum period of three years with the understanding that no
expansion of the present use or building would be permitted during that period
of time; further, that at the end of the three year period, that the applicant
must then apply for and acquire approval of an application for preliminary
plat approval or the conditional zoning would cease and the uses would then
terminate; further, it was recommended that the Planning Commission and
Council extend the time in the event that adequate hardship is shown. All
voted in favor. Hall then moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend
approval of an application for waiver of plat, subject to the following condi-
tions:
1. That the waiver will be permitted for a maximum of three years
unless hardship is shown and extended by the City Council. •
2
/0-/
- . APC Minutes
May 29, 1984
2. The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's
review since it abuts a county road.
3. The plan shall be submitted to the City Engineering Department for
approval of the drainage and grading alterations.
4. An appropriate bond shall be obtained to insure conformance with the
landscaping plan.
5. All other City ordinances shall be adhered to.
6. A detailed grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for approval
by staff.
7. A 50 foot public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob
Road, in addition to further easement if service road is required, along with
easements as referenced in this report.
8. This development shall be responsible for trunk water and storm
sewer area assessments and lateral benefit from trunk watermain at the rates
• in effect at final platting.
All voted in favor.
0
3
/07 a,
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Twenty -Two
CONTRACT 84-11/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS
B. Contract 84-11, Approve Plans 8 Specifications/Authorize
Advertisement for Bids (Oak Cliff Pond Outlet) -- On May 15,
the staff prematurely presented the detailed plans and specifications
for Council review for the installation of the lift station
and force main outlet for Oak Cliff Pond within the Oak Cliff
development adjacent to Slater's Road. This plan review was
premature due to the fact that the technical public hearing
process could not be completed until the June 5 Council meeting.
With Project 400 being considered by the City Council earlier
on the agenda under Public Hearings, and if it is approved,
it would now be appropriate to formally approve the detailed
plans and specifications then authorize the advertisement for
bids. These detailed plans were prepared in advance due to
the fact that the developer signed a petition guaranteeing all
costs associated with the preparation should the project not
be approved by Council action under the Public Hearing agenda
item. All easements necessary for the installation of this
project under Contract 84-11 have been acquired through the
final plat of the Oak Cliff development which was approved by
• Council action on April 17, 1984.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify
the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-11 and,
if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to
be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 29.
C,
J
M.,
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Three
•
PRELIMINARY PLAT/BIRCH PARK ADDITION
A. Sienna Corporation for Preliminary Plat, Birch Park Addition
Consisting of Approximately 43 Acres and Containing 77 Dwelling
Units in Outlots B, C, D, E and F, Windcrest 2nd Addition --
A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission
at their last regular meeting held on May 29, 1984, to consider
a preliminary plat application for Birch Park Addition as submitted
by Sienna Corporation. This item was originally scheduled for
the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting. However, due to an absence
by the property owner, the item is rescheduled for the June 19
meeting. There are approximately six to eight neighbors on Deerwood
Drive that were noticed for the public hearing at the Advisory
Planning Commission meeting and they have been notified by the
Planning Department that this item will be continued until the
June 19 meeting. Information regarding this item will be presented
with the City Council packet for that meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a contin-
uance of the preliminary plat application for Birch Park Addition
until the June 19 City Council meeting.
E
/0 f
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Is
Page Twenty -Four
•
WAIVER OF PLAT/OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION
B. Corporate Construction for Waiver of Plat to Split a Duplex
Lot for Individual Ownership, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition - An
application was made for waiver of Plat to split a duplex lot
for individual ownership described as Lot 2, Block 1, Oakwood
Heights 2nd Addition. The applicant was Corporate Construction
and for additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
Department report found on pages 11t through //�_/= -
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Waiver of Plat as requested by Corporate Construction.
//0
CITY OF EAGAN
• SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND
EXISTING ZONING: R-2ITION
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 5, 1984
DATE OF REPORT; JUNE 1, 1984
REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I
APPLICATION SUBMITTED:
ing a waiver of plat An application has
ownership, in order been submitted
to split a duplex lot request -
COMMENTS: for individual
Lot 2,
Block 1, is an approved
square feet which exceeds the 15,000
is a newt quare duplex lot of
to divide y constructed square foot 15,505
for duplex unit which requirement. There
the individual ownershi the
splitting of this p Staff applicant would like
subject to all lot. If approved, finds no problems with
other City ordinance ruir the lot split • quirements, s should be
/ J
Gre?g_ In r
GHI:jbd
attachments
•
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
N /F"011"nu'i
I�
SED
EL
b
h
O T12
c4OPOSED°ARCELaa
5
Al 830-3-3141"W
CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION
159.94
\A\\PR
O .DRdY1
= N
\ \ a ��+
91I4 XHlJq
�43 �
Di— j
\W N--
p0 94K I
••943.3
28.00\
a
CAR O P"Pose� .
DR/Yf�yy
24.00 00
28D0
I
"'8.30'334111W
83 �� 52.00
`334/ w /49.30
O DENOTES IRON
MONUMENT PROPOSED DESCRIPTIONS
PARCEL A
-'- .9r,19
J
I'
9018 Xa,0.2r1
I
25
The northerly 50.00 feet,as measured at right angles,of Lot 2, Block 1, OAKWOOD
HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County,
Minnesota.
PARCEL B
Lot 2, Block 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Dakota County, Minnesota, except the northerly 50.00 feet, as measured at riaht
angles, of said Lot 2.
WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISON AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND
SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY,
rno+ //2,0
^,.
OAKWOOD
L^1
.
'l.l •
MW COC M[\ b
aera6.3a•E
of s. E)
Ii
OUTLOT R
W
942x25
I , b cI % • T ' 443y9._!547
ID
' 9445-43
1$mo 719f 11_ 10\�t"
HEIGHT
2ND ADDITION
Y
+.n141
z6-
°
14 t
�•'1'n'.rR'�,,'U`;h76a-51 �a9• I n-.r•r.
.1 �\<n �i,i �1�9t ���a JBL ¢��� � � �!'�r•Y ��� � °�
W
S[�-� q/rE•ss ° . w!C 0 �� tai �n� L �".vr�s' ` '/e�/
OUTLOT e
I
p040 4�
" t
"
hb /
UE"s U2
/
OEROr[9 II=
O "PMERAT IOR
Ci
/ O
A. DD2Esa MAP
p
Z. PD
z,
W
74-I
0,
Z.
I
!�ri�"'
EM
■ �tilG
• 1�1111�
own
CzN
RIM-
calf �t/'� �'�•-'7'' � ���q/ �
EXCEPTION
(NOT INCLUDED
IN PARK)
RM
A.
In
Fi I
r
LM
Z. PD
z,
W
74-I
0,
Z.
I
!�ri�"'
EM
■ �tilG
• 1�1111�
own
CzN
RIM-
calf �t/'� �'�•-'7'' � ���q/ �
EXCEPTION
(NOT INCLUDED
IN PARK)
RM
•
C1
J
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Five
VARIANCE/SUNCLIFF DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
C. Suncliff Development Company for a Variance from the Sideyard
Setback Along a Public Street, Suncliff 1st Addition -- An applica-
tion was presented by Suncliff Development Company for a variance
from the sideyard setback along public street within Suncliff
1st Addition. For additional information on this item, refer
to the Planning Department report, a copy is found on pages
1/4 through /.2 .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
variance application as presented by Suncliff Development Company.
• CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCES
APPLICANT: ADVANCE DEVELOPERS
LOCATION: 8 LOTS IN SUN CLIFF 1ST ADDITION, SEC. 29
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 PD
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 5, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 31, 1984
REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting
side yard setbacks on 8 single family lots located in Sun Cliff
1st Addition (see attached list & plan).
COMMENTS: Suncliff lst Addition is a small lot subdivision which
received Final Plat approval on October 18, 1983. The variances
being requested are all on corner lots of interior streets except
for Lots 1, Block 3 which is on Beaver Dam Road.
is The City Code requires a 30' setback from the R.O.W. of a public
street. The applicant is requesting 101_, 7' and 5' variances from
that requirement.
The reason for the variance request is to accomodate the various
house plans onto the corner lots. If the full 30' setback was re-
quired it would be very difficult to locate or place structures
on these particular lots. This variance request was originally
asked for with the overall plan, however, the minutes of July 19,
1983, state that this must be applied for. Attached is a copy of
the July 19, 1983 minutes for your review. .
If approved, the variances should be subject to the following
conditions:
1) All other conditions of the Suncliff P.D. Agreement.
2) All other conditions and ordinances be adhered to.
• Greg H. Ingrah m
GHI:jbd
attachments
116
a
0
List of lots with requested variance:
Lot 13, Block,l, Sun Cliff First Addition
10' side yard variance on Timber Wolf Trail
Lot 1, Block 2, Sun Cliff First Addition
10' side yard variance on Timber Wolf Trail
Lot 13, Block 2, Sun Cliff First Addition
7' side yard variance on Bear Path Trail
Lot 1, Block 3, Sun Cliff First Additon
5' side yard variance on Beaver Dam Road
Lot 11, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition
10' side yard variance on Sunset Road
Lot 25, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition •
10' side yard variance on Sunset Road
Lot 26, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition
10' side yard variance on Sunset Road
Lot 1, Block 5, Sun Cliff First Addition
10' variance on Sunset Road
//7
0
•
Council Minutes
' July 19, 1983
171
SON CLIFF - PREL11MURY PLAT
The application of Advance Developers, Inc. for preliminary plat approval
of Sun Cliff Addition, consisting of approximately 89.1 acres and containing
277 dwelling units was next considered. The Advisory Planning Commission
heard the application on July 12, 1983 and recommended denial including those
reasons contained in the Advisory Planning Commission minutes. Dave
Sellergren was present and indicated that the proposal is to change the use
t
-� from R-4 to R-1 plus a few duplex units, with a total of 274 units. He statea
a meeting had been held with neighboring owners and that all single family
homes would now be built on.Beaver Dam Road with the exception of one duplex
corner unit. The minimum width would be 60 feet at the building setback line.
He further stated that there would be proposals for amendments to the planned
development, including the extension of Beaver Dam Road southerly and also,
the south area would be proposed to be transformed into a mixed development,
including housing, and commercial uses. He further requested that 20 foot
setbacks be allowed -on interior lots because the streets would be 60 feet in
width, according to staff recommendation. Also, a trail would be eliminated
to the pond to the north. Several neighbors were present and generally agreed
with the proposal, with no objections. Mr. Sellergren stated that the intent
is
of the applicant is to rezone'each of the phases as the time of request for
final plat approval. Thomas moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the
application, subject to the following conditions:
1. The developer shall submit an application for variance for lots and
internal streets for setback purposes.
2. The developer shall impose restrictive covenants for for maintenance
of the duplexes, rather than the imposition of a requirement for Homeowners
Association.
3. Deviation from lot size shall be in accordance with the exibit
submitted stating all lot sizes within this development.
4. The 30 footsetbackshall be allowed on Beaver Dam Road.
5. The parkland proposal shall be reviewed by the Park Commission and
be subject to their recommendation.
6. The development agreement shall be signed prior to the application
of final plat.
7. The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission
because it abuts a County Road.
8. All other applicable ordinances shall be complied with.
• 9. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff.
All voted in favor.
SEE PLAT FILE
//F,
I , SUN CLIFF FIRST ADDITION •"
�
ADOR HOUSEESSES
rr%i!r /idlt [....•.. a.. nn r [y.. e.n r.nn+ r�
r • /6. 1, lr H•y •w+ [ 'Ok+dle•wil—_-� � i r r
I�- �y.- __ As. •A.f ;�, n � r , 4. .y -r f �-•��.i'u--wo--- ntre. n. °.
r—=rrr ,p��r 41�' ,wA� • �T • � .;w�.4t �.• 'w • w'rio .')'+ •� ° •�+� • •' ( .
16 \\ • :�eP I: � c' f '��"�' Ta, • 4 !'. � + F, '1•r i+� !y
� \�•� .1 L'T n I ya a e r +•i.e i re _ �\
•`j� A l e
\ \ � yr � P �\ �.�1.,.r .! .rte• I�
w:r may, %, •fss• • .s rn.; rr ![ =1 •r
Ile
It
,�I `t \ t +�>,r � • �: .y� 't• �;t k nil, � 1M`•�.�. i � �•
/� ,w .t,, e, sl.,\. n'c :• a AIN
yft sl -
r4+0 /-0` � '�.� to �n 1',�� 1 � t•s
� f>Imm A
�s �.Y ��i 0° .w� n • ,V �wYn .V •+r .fir". lV 'i
Lei[ � r = _ t 4/j:, / \\ i y� • ti,� rl�• R ,,% '� .I
ppppppw��
Cll MTNDCN D AS SOCIAT(S, INf;• �"'- I
v� �Q t C.R.-WINDEN 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
jj�J LAND SURVEYORS Tel {46-394{
1381 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 66106
For:
KEY—LAND HOMES
• NOTE:
D Denotes Wooden Stake
Proposed Garage Floor E1...M.03
(SEB.7) Denotes Proposed
Finished Ground E1.
Ir' Q —.1 Denotes Direction
ft Of Surface Drainage
Cb OyP Vertical Datum - N.G.V.D. 1929
J�f 10
/ \ iZ6•�9' fore Scale: 1" = 30'
oc Zy iy ���; C Denotes Iron
•P M, r Monument
O /
/O / `aQ � 30 O
/6.3 yi• / `l
b a:
BF \d �
r
q Ty Zy.E //o
Lot 13, Block 2, SUN CLIFF FIRST
ADDITION, Dakota Coanty, Minnesota.
WE MEREST CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVET OF THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF All BUILDINGS. IF ANY.
THEREON, AND All VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND.
•Doted this Il th dot, of AF.ri I A D 1954 C. R. WINDEN L ASSOCIATES. INC.
lor
S,,••vor. M,nn•,ol• toR.,lrol:on No 7
7�
/.2-0
CP
.7
t
< t19
LOT 13, BLOCK
SGALE•. I" - 30'—O"
9
N
C,
•
W 0/ 91"
For: McKlyn Construction, Inc.
•
Q
Q 3
C. R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS T*L 646.3646
1711 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 66108
S
Scale: 1" - 30'
\ Ns' 0.
NOTE: 6 O
G Denotes.Iron Monument ?9•.
s Denotes Wooden Stake F (C5
Proposed garage floor E: -e23.3
(800.0) Denotes proposed finishee: ground E1.
. me— Denotes direction of surface drainage
Vertical Datum - N.G.V.D. 1929
'19/4
v
Lot 1, Block 3, :>ULJ CLIFF FIRST ADDITION
Dakota County, Minnesota
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE Df SCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF All BUILDINGS, IF ANY,
THEREON, AND All VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND
•Doled IAu 14 rA day of F " '/1 A D. fV B4
C. R./+ DIN a ASSOCIATES, INC.
Uv
S�..oYer, M.nnewre Repnvorron No 77?G
/ 0
62e -
>
r41�
lb
o
� \
\\�
C
Q
Q
►�'�
n) t
v V
/01 \
O
/S
/
o v�. • i
JZ '
LOT I I, BLOCK 4
SCALE = P'= 30'-0"
/.23
0
0
•
0
•
0
S�NSF T
r
So,
4m•
r
r
I
r
L07 ZS, BLOCK 4
SCALE: I"= 30' - O"
171
-k\N -
0 0
�1�N �33a
DO \
H
Uo
O
10
P.
171
171
LOT Z (,o, BLOCK
SCALE: I" =ZO'-O"
12(�
m
N
v
n
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Twenty -Six
•
RESOLUTION/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
D. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance for a Resolution Providing
for a Concurrent Detachment of Incorporated Land -- At the last
regular City Council meeting, the City Planner and City Administra-
tor reviewed a parcel of property north of and adjacent to Inter-
state 494 that is partly in the City of Mendota Heights and
partly in the City of Eagan. There is a request by Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance that this property be annexed to provide
continuity for development purposes. For further information
on this item, refer to a memorandum prepared by the City Planner
found on pages /.2 through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Resolution providing for concurrent detachment and annexation
of incorporated land as requested by Northwestern Mutual Life
Insurance Company.
1zQ
• MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
DATE: MAY 31, 1984
SUBJECT: DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY FOR NORTHWESTERN
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
As you may recall at the last City Council meeting, the City Council
suggested Staff review to look into the potential and possibilities
as to what could be done in order that agreements or transactions
could be made for these slivers of property which now are basically
detached from Eagan and Mendota Heights by the construction of
I-494. In reviewing these small isolated parcels, the recommenda-
tion for its request by Northwestern Mutual Life and Northland
Mortgage Company is the detachment and annexation procedure which
will then transfer these parcels to the City of Mendota Heights.
This then would allow for a continuous parcel in which Northland
Mortgage is proposing to develop at this time in Mendota Heights.
In reviewing .the overall northern boundary of the City of Eagan,
it appears that on the east side of the interchange of I-494 and
I -35E that the same situation will occur, however, there will be
• slivers of Mendota Heights property in the City of Eagan. Hopefully,
the same transaction will occur on the easterly side of this inter-
change as what is occurring on the west. In review of this, the
City is not just giving away property to the City of Mendota Heights
but will mutually work out where Mendota Heights will also be giving
Eagan some property in the future.
Enclosed with this memorandum is a Resolution that the City of
Mendota Heights approved on May 15, 1984. Staff has also included
a Resolution which the City of Eagan can adopt stating the similar
information required for the concurrent detachment and annexation
procedures. Once each of the Cities have adopted these Resolutions
and if both Cities agree, it is a fairly simple task going through
the process of annexation. Also, enclosed is a survey provided
by Northwestern Mutual Life showing the parcels which are being
annexed by the City of Mendota Heights. If you have any questions
or would like additional information regarding this particular. item,
please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Dale C. Runkle
• DCR:jbd
Attachments
CITY OF EAGAN
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA •
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR CONCURRENT DETACHMENT
AND ANNEXATION OF INCORPORATED LAND
WHEREAS, certain contiguous parcels of land falling within
the corporate limits of the City of Eagan, at the southern boundary
of the City of Mendota Heights, have been separated from the major
portion of the City of Eagan as the result of I-494 construction;
and
WHEREAS, the parcels of land, currently owned by Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance Company, are bounded on the north by -the
southern boundary of a portion of the Mendota Heights Industrial
Park; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the owners of the property and
Northland Land Company that the land be acquired by Northland Land
Company; and
WHEREAS, the property is isolated by the freeway from the
majority of Eagan and is a natural extension of both, both abutting
the Mendota Heights Industrial Park and the corporate limits of •
Mendota Heights;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Eagan that the City Council is desirous of detaching
Parcels No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 shown and described on the Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance Company Composite Survey attached hereto;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Minnesota Municipal Board
is hereby requested to order the concurrent detachment of the des-
cribed parcels from the corporate limits of the City of Eagan and
its annexation into the corporate limits of the City of Mendota
Heights in accordance with the provisions of Minne:;ota Statutes,
Section 414.061
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan this 5th day of
June, 1984.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF EAGAN
By
130
•
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
• RESOLUTION NO. 84- 30
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR CONCURRENT DETACHMENT
AND ANNEXATION OF INCORPORATED LAND
WHEREAS, certain contiguous parcels of land falling within the corporate
limits of the City of Eagan, at the southern boundary of the City of Mendota
Heights, have been separated from the major portion of the City of Eagan as
the result of I-494 construction; and
WHEREAS, the parcels of land, currently owned by Northwestern Mutual
Life Insurance Company, are bounded on the north by the southern boundary
of a portion of the Mendota Heights Industrial Park; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the owners of the property and Northland
Land Company that the land be acquired by Northland Land Company; and
WHEREAS, the property is isolated by the freeway from the majority
of Eagan and is a natural extension of both, both abutting the Mendota
Heights Industrial Park and the corporate limits of Mendota Heights;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights that the City Council is desirous of annexing Parcels
No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 shown and described on the Northwestern Mutual Life
is Insurance Company Composite Survey attached hereto; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Minnesota Municipal Board is hereby
requested to order the concurrent detachment of the described parcels from
the corporate limits of the City of Eagan and its annexation into the cor-
porate limits of the City of Mendota Heights in accordance with the pro-
visions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 414.061.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of
May, 1984.
ATTEST:
K.Irthleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
r�L
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
44�,,Z l o(trC�^'
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
l3/
�• a u,v
.err r1...I
a VVn
COMPOSITE SURVEY FOR
NORTHWESTERN4kUTUAL LIFE
• r 4r•u.., �..�r.w�11 F•a s•r•.nr
••.'I•A
IACfl / �•�nn.11 VJYfiIIt�
ICRC[,. , ... .I
INSURANCE CO.
If.1l'.: �: •�i�i. is r
I .
.,•w r .n y V,
od..
r�
u
_wr
nil e, v.eatn•1...
+�• = � _'_ _ ' ; ,v .YMp � s.rwiw..r Von VF. I .... .•v wlTr^... w�. C
I A94
_Lr ys
r.•n
PINT RSTATE— c �• -
•tea. .w ...H �
4 • 'I i�9 I• S + , 1. I I
,
j • ]SID
h `
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Seven
MUNICIPAL CENTER LANDSCAP
A. Municipal Center Landscaping -- Following the referendum
for the Municipal Center project, a budget was approved by the
City Council in the amount of $10,000 to complete landscaping
around the Police Department -Municipal Center complex. With
the amount of black dirt required to properly grade the area,
the cost for sod, trees, bushes and other landscape material,
the budget will not be adequate to complete the project. In
addition, an identification sign was proposed on Pilot Knob
Road to identify the Municipal Center building which was not
budgeted for as a part of the project. The Director of Parks
and Recreation was directed to prepare a design for an identifica-
tion sign and budget for completing the landscaping at the Municipal
Center building. The memorandum and final design work have
not been completed, however will be included with the Administrative
Agenda packet on Monday. It is important to consider finalization
of the landscaping so the work can be completed before the hot
months occur in July and August.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
• changes to the Municipal Center landscaping plan.
E
133
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Eight
BURNSVILLE/EAGAN CABLE COMMISSION
B. Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission -- Periodically, the City
Administrator places the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission item
on the official agenda to provide an update on the progress
being made by Group W in their efforts to fulfill the franchise
agreement. The City Administrator will provide a report regarding
the time schedule for installation of cable television at the
meeting on Tuesday.
The Cable Communications Commission has been operating with
dollars that were generated from a $10,000 franchising application
fee. The Commission is to be funded from revenues collected
as a result of a three to five percent franchising fee. Since
residents of both communities are not serviced by cable at this
time, there is no franchising fee available to the Cable Commission
which is the main source of revenue. Group W will advance to
the Cable Communications Commission future franchising fees
to allow for their operations before cable connections are made.
In order to receive an advance on the franchise fees from Group
W, both the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan must approve a transfer
to the Cable Commission, the Cable Commission will then make
a request of Group W and reimburse the two Cities. A formal
request has been received from the Joint Commission that each
City appropriate $20,000 at this time and an immediate request
be made from Group W to advance franchise fees to the Commission
in the amount of $40,000 and as soon as those monies are received,
both the communities will be fully reimbursed byy the Joint Cable
Communications Commission. Enclosed on page /3S is a copy
of this request.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an
appropriation of $20,000 from the City of Eagan to fund the
Burnsville/Eagan Cable Communications Commission with the under-
standing that the City of Eagan will be fully reimbursed as
soon as an advance is received from Group W to the Cable Communica-
tions Commission for future franchise fees.
13 54
•
E
of aagan
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199
BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
MOIiO1
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
JERRY THOMAS
THEODORE WACHTER
CC MO ms
MAY 30, 1984
THOMAS HEDGES
ON Ab "Ia
EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE
Gro Cb k
Tan Hedges
City Administrator
Fagan City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Rd.
Eagan, Mn. 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
The Burnsville/Eagan Cable Communications Cartnission requests an appro-
priation of $20,000.00 from each of the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan
to fund the Commission according to its approved 1984 General Budget.
Franchise Article II, "Grant of Franchise and Acceptance," section 1,
item 2 on p. 7 states: After the initial payment of the acceptance fee,
should costs in excess of the acceptance fee be incurred by City prior
to the payment of the first Franchise fee, City may charge such excess
costs to Grantee and Grantee shall pay then on demand by City, as an advance
on the payment of Franchise fees.
The Cc mLission appreciates your cooperation.
Thank you,
Ann C. Bevis, Cable Adninistrator
cc. Honorable Chair Jim Smith
Treasurer Ron Voracek
Finance Director Gene VanOverbeke
13T
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
is
Page Twenty -Nine
CONTRACT 84-6/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS
C. Contract 84-6, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for
Bids (Sealcoating) -- As a part of the approved 1984 budget,
$60,000 from the general fund was provided for sealcoating to
be matched in a like amount from the major street fund to provide
a total of $120,000 for sealcoating during 1984. The following
subdivisions are proposed to be sealcoated under Contract 84-6:
"Buck Shot"
Duckwood Estates
St. Francis Woods 1st Addition
St. Francis Woods 2nd Addition
Drexel Heights
Cedar Grove 8th Addition
Meadowlands Addition
Hilltop Estates
Evergreen Acres
"Trap Rock"
Thomas Lake Road
Duckwood Drive
Wescott Road (Pilot Knob
to Denmark)
The estimated cost of this sealcoating program is approximately
$118,000. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss
• this year's sealcoating program with the Council at the meeting
on June 5.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify
the plans and specifications for Contract 84-6 (sealcoating)
and, if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening
to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Monday, July 2, 1984.
C�
/3 4
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty
•
CONTRACT 84-14/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS
D. Contract 84-14, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for
Bids (Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place South)
-- Under Item A of Public Hearings, the City Council will be
considering the installation of utilities to service the Lexington
Place 2nd Addition and the Lexington Place South Addition.
When the Council received the petition requesting the preparation
of the feasibility report, the developer also requested simultaneous
preparation of detailed plans and specifications while guaranteeing
their cost should the project not be approved by Council action
at the public hearing. That allowed the staff, through the
consultant, to prepare these detailed plans to be presented
to the Council on the same night as the public hearing. Therefore,
if the public hearing for Project 404 is approved, it would
be in order for the Council to consider approving the plans
and specifications and authorizing the advertisement for bids.
Our consulting engineer will be available to discuss in further
detail any question the Council may have. The agreement and
easement has been executed for the installation of the sanitary
sewer across the west property line of Barry and Marge Tilley
to provide the development of this subdivision.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify •
the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-14 and
if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to
be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 29, 1984.
n
U
/37
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Thirty -One
CONTRACT 84-15/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS
E. Contract 84-15, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for
Bids (Sun Cliff 2nd Addition) -- Earlier on the Council agenda,
the City Council will be considering Prject 398 for the installation
of streets and utilities to service the Sun Cliff 2nd Additions.
At the time that the developer submitted the petition requesting
the preparation of the feasibility report for that public hearing,
they also requested the simultaneous preparation of the detailed
plans and specifications while guaranteeing their cost if the
project should not be approved by the Council at the public
hearing. This allowed the staff, through the consulting engineer,
to prepare the plans to be presented for Council consideration
on the same night as the public hearing. Our consulting engineer
will be available to discuss in detail any questions the Council
may have pertaining to this proposed installation of streets
and utilities under Contract 84-15. Also, under the Consent
Agenda, the Council will be considering the final plat approval
for this subdivision which will provide for all the .necessary
easements and rights-of-way for this project to commence.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify
• detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-15 (Sun Cliff
2nd Addition - streets and utilities) and if approved, authorize
the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m.
on Monday, July 2, 1984.
•
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
• FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 1, 1984
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
Metropolitan Council Chairperson Appointment
Mayor Blomquist and the City Administrator have attended two
meetings recently where the new Metropolitan Council Chairperson,
Sandra Gardebring, was the guest speaker. Those meetings were
the Municipal Legislative Commission meeting held Wednesday,
May 23, in Plymouth, and the Association of Metropolitan Municipali-
ties Banquet held in Brooklyn Park on the evening of Wednesday,
May 30. Mayor Blomquist made notes of Ms. Gardebring's speech
at the AMM banquet outlining specifically her objectives as
the new Metropolitan Council Chairperson. Those objectives
are as follows:
1) The Governor's objective to study and possible fund a light
rail transit (LRT) somewhere in the metropolitan area.
The new chairperson has indicated that this study will
be a priority item for the Metropolitan Council.
• 2) The creation of a rapid transit board (RTB) which will
act as a managing arm of the mass transit commission is
also a strong objective of the Metropolitan Council. Because
of opt -out and other related legislation that affect a
centralized busing effort, it is becoming necessary to
create a long range planning arm of the mass transit commission
allowing the RTB to involve itself with planning and overall
objectives of a mass transit operation and keep the MTC
as a operating arm for bus service. Ms. Gardebring is
asking for cities to volunteer persons for appointments
to the RTB.
3) Solid waste landfill abatement is another priority.
4) The combined sewer overflow (CSO) which mainly affects
the two core cities is another priority and concern of
the Metropolitan Council. This item would be very expensive
and must be carefully weighed.
5) Regional channels for cable television is another effort
and priority that the Metropolitan Council will be considering.
Two other items of interest and seem to be a priority of the
new chairperson are long-term housing efforts for the elderly
and other social programs for the elderly since the population
• shift has rapidly increased the percentage of elderly in the
metropolitan area. Her main summary statement at both presentations
/3 y
Informative Memo •
June 1, 1984
Page Two
was the Metropolitan Council will "act as a planning and coordinat-
ing body". These statements were emphasized and seemed to be
well received by all municipalities.
League of Minnesota Cities Presidency
Each year a member of the Board of Directors of the League of
Minnesota Cities is selected to be president and another member
as vice-president. The vice-president normally moves into the
presidency the following year. This year Iry Anderson, of Interna-
tional Falls, is president, while Adrian Herps, a city councilmember
in Bloomington, is vice-president. Mr. Herps has decided, for
business reasons, not to pursue the presidency next year. Since
the presidency is rotated between metro and out state, it would
be appropriate to select someone on the Board of Directors from
the metropolitan area to be nominated for the League presidency.
Mary Anderson, the Mayor of Golden Valley and former chairperson
of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, is seeking
the presidency and has received significant support from suburban
communities. Mayor Blomquist is suggesting that the City of
Eagan support Mary Anderson for the presidency. She is very
sympathetic to local government aids and many of the issues •
that are confronting the City of Eagan as well as other suburban
communities. More than likely, she will not be opposed and
if she is, it would probably be generated from a League Board
member in one of the two core cities.
Final Cost Analysis of the Minnesota Jockey Club
For a Class A Horse Racing Facility
The City Administrator has concluded the final processing of
all bills involving the Minnesota Jockey Club's application
that was processed by the City of Eagan for a Class A horse
racing facility. All the bills were reviewed and a letter drafted
to Steve Pflaum with copies of those bills attached to finalize
a reimbursement for all expenses incurred by the City of Eagan.
As an informative item, the City Administrator has prepared
a brief memorandum to the City Council outlining the final cost
analysis. A copy is enclosed on page _LSL� Any member of
the City Council would like more detail on any of these costs,
copies of the bills and more detailed information as prepared
by the City Administrator can be made available.
use of Dakota County Western Court Facility as Precinct Polling
Place
The Finance Director/City Clerk has received some resistance
from the judges regarding the use of the Western Court Facility •
located on Cliff Road as a precinct polling place. The City
Administrator has sent a letter to the County Administrator
• Informative Memo
June 1, 1984
Page 3
copies enclosed for your reference on page /1/-6 , and also
has met with staff members of Dakota County to review the issue.
Because of the autonomy of the judges, it is very difficult
for the County Board to intervene and require that the judges
make the facility available. The City Administrator will be
visiting with Judge Hoey to explain how the voting will impact
their operations and is hopeful that this matter can be worked
out by June 13, which is the deadline for any change in precincts
as required by the Secretary of State's office. If any member
of the City Council has contact with any of the judges and would
promote the need and use of one of the courtrooms for polling
location, it would be most helpful.
Yankee Square Inn
A letter was received from Yankee Square Inn regarding a provision
that the City of Eagan in time of a disaster can use their airport
shuttle bus. A copy of this letter is enclosed on page
MASAC
• Enclosed on pages / ?' through / ,!rO are copies of minutes
of the last MASAC meeting held on April 24.
Minnesota Symphony Orchestra
Enclosed on page /6'1 is official notification that the Minnesota
Symphony Orchestra will be performing at the Minnesota Zoo on
Saturday, July 14.
Roadside Fruit Stands and Sale Stand
At the request of the City Council, the City Attorney has prepared
a memorandum regarding roadside fruit stands and sale stands.
A copy is enclosed on pages /$Y through /53
Tires Plus Standard
The City has sent a letter to the owner of Tires Plus Standard
siting their violations on two different occasions. The second
letter,- which was sent from the Chief Building Official, is
enclosed on page /$11- for your review.
Fire Department Monthly Reports
Enclosed on pages /6S through 164 are monthly reports
for the volunteer Fire Department which represent January and
February, 1984.
• Rodney Schaumburg
Enclosed is a copy of a letter addressed to the Mayor and Council
from Rodney Schaumburg concerning the Pilot Knob Road improvements
% T�
Informative Memo
June 1, 1984 •
Page 4
and also a response letter from the Director of Public Works
to Mr. Schaumburg regarding that item. These letters are enclosed
on pages /.57 through /19
Footing Inspection at Woodthrush Court
At the recent special City Council meeting, a concern was raised
regarding the footings that were poured at 3664 Woodthrush Court
and a response from the Chief Building Inspector is enclosed
for your review on page /60
Bloomington Platin
A concern was also raised at the same special City Council meeting
regarding a business that was relocated from Bloomington to
Eagan called "Bloomington Plating". Concerns regarding that
building are addressed in a memorandum attached on pages
/G/ through /63
Entitlement Issuer/ID Bonds
Enclosed on pages 1411- through /66 is a copy of a letter
and the certification that was sent to the State of Minnesota
Department of Energy and Economic Development regarding Eagan's •
request to become an entitlement issuer for industrial development
bonds. The City Administrator has contacted the State and learned
that the $26,000,000 issue for the Minnesota Jockey Club horse
racing track will qualify as an issue. This means that the
City of Eagan will be able to utilize three of the top four
years, which are 1980, 1981 and 1983, and the average entitlement
of each year is in excess of $15,000,000. This means that Eagan
could have available some $15,000,000 of industrial revenue
bonds to issue for industrial expansion. Most suburban communities,
with the possible exception of Bloomington, are looking at an
average of about $2-$3,000,000. The issuance of these bonds,
though never used by the Minnesota Jockey Club, could be a real
bonanza for the City in the next couple of years.
Can -American Conditions
At the last regular City Council meeting a request was made
to provide a copy of all the conditions that were approved for
the Can -American project. Those conditions are listed as a
part of the May 15 City Council meeting minutes.
Policy For Rescue Squad Calls
City. Councilmember Thomas has received inquiries from members
of the volunteer Fire Department regarding the new policy that
was implementea by the Fire and Police Departments- for 'rescue •
squad calls. A meeting was held on May 7 between City Council -
member Thomas, Chief of Police Berthe, Fire Chief Childers and
Informative Memo
• June 1, 1984
Page 5
the City Administrator to discuss those concerns. A memorandum
was prepared by the City Administrator, a copy is enclosed on
pages 147 through /6of" outlining the concerns that were
discussed at that meeting. As a result, the two Chiefs were
asked to address those questions and issues and a follow-up
meeting was held on Tuesday, May 22, at which time the issues
were further discussed and a consensus reached that the new
policy would continue for one (1) year as an experiment and
be evaluated again at that time.
City Administrator
•
E
/d i
E
•
1]
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: MAY 31, 1984
SUBJECT: FINAL COST ANALYSIS OF THE MINNESOTA JOCKEY CLUB'S
APPLICATION FOR A CLASS A HORSE RACING FACILITY
The City of Eagan incurred a number of expenses while processing
the Class A horse racing facility application that was presented
by the Minnesota Jockey Club. For a general review of those
expenses, the following analysis is provided:
During 1983, there were engineering expenses incurred totalling
$828.50 paid to the Firm of Bonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik,
an appraisal fee in the amount of $800.00 for J.E. Parranto
Associates, Inc., and legal services to Dave Kennedy in the
amount of $2,174.50. There were also legal services paid
to Paul Hauge in the amount of $2,230.92 and a reimbursement
of City staff time and miscellaneous costs, primarily hours
recorded by the City Administrator totalling $5,172.87.
Therefore, the total cost reimbursement to the City of Eagan
was $11,206.79 for 1983.
The costs incurred during 1984 totalled $18,446.46. The
cost breakdown for 1984 is as follows:
1. Legal services for Paul Hauge in the amount of $1,331.08.
2. Evensen-Dodge, Inc., for services rendered in the review
of the tax increment financing issue in the amount of
$12,448.75 and for time allocated and recorded by the
City Administrator in the amount of $4,193.75. Therefore,
the total expenses incurred by the City and requisitioned
for reimbursement by the Minnesota Jockey Club is $17,973.58.
3. Engineering services provided by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik
.8 Associates amounted to $472.88. (Previously invoiced
and paid.)
There were also other expenses incurred by Dave Kennedy and
Steve Rosholt during 1984 that were directly billed to the Minnesota
Jockey Club and, therefore, are not shown as a request for payment
by the City of Eagan.
In summary, the total costs incurred by the City of Eagan for
staff and consulting services was $29,653.25. All other consulting
services and time incurred for the project was a direct obligation
of the Minnesota Jockey Club. The time involvement of other
City staff was `ori in comparison to other development appli-
cations('
\— Y.,.11A
City Administrator
TLH/jj
cc: Gene Van Overbeke, Director of Finance/City Clerk
/11C
OF
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. RO. BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454.8100
MAY 17, 1984
MR FRED JOY
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
DAKOTA COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1560 HIGHWAY 55
HASTINGS MN 55033
Dear Fred:
BEA BLOMOUIST
Mow
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
JERRY THOMAS
THEODORE WACHTER
0aax+,non�3
THOMAS HEDGES
ON Aa Rota
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
ON 0&1
The City of Eagan, through City Clerk Gene VanOverbeke, has made
- some informal inquiries concerning the use of the Dakota County
Western Court -Facility as a precinct polling place for elections
conducted by the City. It is my understanding that Jeff Connell
of your staff reviewed the matter with certain County officials
and responded that it would be best for the City to not use this
facility.
It has been the opinion of City of Eagan officials that the use of
this facility will allow for the most efficient precints within
the City and benefit all concerned parties. It is also the
opinion of City officials that the use of one courtroom two to
three times per year maximum would not necessarily be disruptive
to the normal activities at that location. With advance notice,
scheduling should not be a problem.
Therefore, please consider this letter to be the City's formal
request for use of this facility as provided by M.S.A. 204B.16,
Subd. 6, which clearly says that any statutory city, county,
school district, etc., shall make their facilities, including
parking, available for the holding of city, county, state and
federal elections.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We will be happy
to provide whatever additional information you desire relative to
this request. The City Council is expected to formalize precinct
boundaries at its June 5, 1984, meeting and we would very much
appreciate a response from your office prior to that time.
S,
rely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
TLH/jj
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
i 11-5
0
YANKEE SQUARE INN
3450 Washington Drive • Eagan. Minnesota 55122 • (012) 452-0100
17J
May 17,1984
Honorable Mayor Blomquist
Members of City Council
City of Eagan
P.D. Box 21-199
Eagan Minnesota 55122
Gentlemen,
The staff and managment of the Yankee Square Inn, .'is pleased to
announce the start of our airport shuttle service. Guests of the
Yankee Square Inn will have access to the Eagan business community
as well. This service is part of our policy to better serve our
Eagan business community, as well as our guests convenience.
We are proud to serve the Eagan community, and feel a strong
obligation to serve the city that serves us. We at the Yankee
Square Inn, would like to offer our shuttle bus to the City of
Eagan in the event of an emergency or disaster. The shuttle
service is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
It is our sincere hope that such a situation never arises,'but
should it become necessary to call on us please don't hesitate
to call. If you have any questions or suggestions, as to our
service please call me.
Si ely,
I
Timothy B. Dunn
General Manager
0
/546
MINUTES
METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL
GENERAL MEETING
7:30 P.M.
April 24, 1984
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Call to Order, Roll Call.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Walter Rockenstein at 7:30 p.m.
The Secretary was asked to call the roll and the following members were in
attendance:
Gary White (A)
Ben Griggs (R)
Robert Johnson (R)
Ron Glaub (R)
Jeff Hamiel (R)
Art Tomes (A)
David Woodrow (R)
John Richter (R)
Walter Rockenstein (R)
Jim Serrin (R),
Roylene Champeaux (R)
Dennis Schulstad (A)
Kris Clinton (A)
Steve Cramer (A)
Scott Bunin (R)
Carl Vangsness (R)
Joyce Maddox (R)
Eugene Bohmert (A)
Lloyd Wickstrom (A)
Martin Kirsch (R)
Donald Priebe (R)
Larry Shaughnessy (R)
Tom Baker (R)
Midway Airlines
Northwest Airlines
Republic Airlines
Minnesota Business Aircraft Association
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce
St. Paul Chamber of Commerce
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of St. Paul
City of St. Paul
City of St. Paul
City of St. Paul
City of St. Paul
City of Richfield
City of Richfield
City of Mendota Heights
City of Eagan
147
•
•
MASAC Minutes
Advisors
• John Aamot
Nancy Witta
Darrell Weslander
Joan Vandersloot
Visitors
Dave Kelso
Captain John Lindstrom
Colonel Jerry Litschke
Captain Dennis Lord
Jim Aswegan
J. K. Nelson
Chauncey Case
-2-
April 24, 1984 1.
Federal Aviation Administration
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Technical Advisor
Secretary
Minnesota Pollution
Delta Air Lines
Army National Guard
Army National Guard
MN DOT
Bloomington
Metropolitan Council
2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting of March 27, 1984•
Control Agency
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections to the minutes of
March 27, 1984. There being none, the minutes were approved as presented.
3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications.
• Darrell Weslander presented copies of the articles to be placed in two (2) editions
of the Highland Villager and the West Side -West St. Paul Voice regarding the
temporary -relocation of the Army National Guard helicopter unit from St'. Paul
Downtown Airport to Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport.
Chairman Rockenstein introduced Captain John Lindstrom, Chief Pilot, from Delta
Air Lines. Captain Lindstrom expressed his personal delight at introducing
service to Minneapolis/St. Paul. Delta will fly six (6) trips per day; three
(3) from Atlanta and three (3) from Chicago on B727 -equipment. He assured the
council that Delta's fleet meets all current noise abatement standards.
4. Technical Advisor's Preferential
ilization Reoort and Complaint
The reports for the month of March were presented by Darrell Weslander.
John Richter asked Jeff Hamiel about projected operations for the next five (5)
years. Jeff Hamiel stated that MAC Chairman, Ray Glumack, would like to address
MASAC at a future meeting to elaborate on this and related issues.
Larry Shaughnessy questioned the take -off methods on runways I1L and 11R.
John Aamot of the FAA explained the departure procedure, the separation require-
ments involved and the reasons discrepancies may occur.
•5• Persons Wishing to Address the Council.
There were none.
/a
Y
MASAC Minutes -3- April 24, 1984
0
VA
I
E
Presentation
Army National Guard Personnel.
Colonel Jerry Litschke presented a brief summary regarding the temporary use of •
the facilities at Wold Chamberlain by the Army National Guard helicopter unit. He
explained that no training would be conducted at MSP, and that the river corridor
route had been coordinated with the tower. The expected date of return to St. Paul
is sometime in November or December of this year.
Report of Legislative Committee.
Larry Shaughnessy reported on the April 12 meeting of the Legislative Committee,
and presented Resolution 84-3 in support of the petition to cease the manufacture
and registration of aircraft which do not meet Stage 3 noise standards after
January 1, 1986.
It was moved by Larry Shaughnessy, seconded by Scott Bunin, that the resolution
be adopted. The motion passed unanimously.
Update: Status of Legislation Regarding Noise Abatement.
House File 1945 and Senate File 1914 regardingairport noise abatement authored
by Representative Wesley Skoglund was discussed by Jeff Hamiel. While in the
Senate, language of the bill was changed; however, Representative Skoglund has
thus far not introduced it to the House. It is uncertain whether it will be
voted upon during this legislative session.
Summary of MAC Staff Meeting with Concerned Citizens in Burnsville.
Darrell Weslander briefly described the meeting he and Jeff Hami8l had in
Burnsville on April 11 regarding the experimental use of the 180 turn after
departure on runway 22, and its affect on the area residents.
•
Also mentioned was Burnsville's interest in MASAC and its desire to be represented.
Report of MASAC Representative to MAC Meeting of April 16, 1984,
The summary of the Commission meeting of April 16 was presented by Jeff Hamiel.
Items of interest were as follows:
- the approval of the lease to Burlington Northern to relocate the
Western hangar to the new cargo area adjacent to Republic,
- House Bill 1945 (as discussed in item 8. of these minutes),
- REIL lights at Anoka/Blaine,
- ILS at Airlake, and
- the EIS petition regarding Anoka/Blaine as a minor role airport.
Other Items Not on the Agenda. •
Darrell Weslander explained an upcoming sample study utilizing handicapped
individuals to count aircraft operations on the various runways.
/SW
MASAC Minutes -4- April 24, 1984
12. Establish Next Meeting Date.
• The next meeting date was established as May 22, 1984, and an invitation to attend
will be extended to Mr. Larry McCabe.
13. Adjournment.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:12 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Joan Vandersloot
MASAC Secretary
\J
•
160
0
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: MAY 18, 1984
RE: FIRST ANNOUNCEMENT
MINNESOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA - MINNESOTA ZOO
For some time now this department, in cooperation with the communities of Lake-
ville and Apple Valley, has been working with the Minnesota Zoo and the Minn-
esota Symphony Orchestra in promoting a "free admission" concert at the Minn-
esota Zoo.
Just recently, we have been able to conclude an agreement and would like to
• make you aware of this first announcement that the Minnesota Orchestra will be
playing at the Minnesota Zoo on Saturday, July 14, in a free concert for
residents south of the Minnesota River.
This promises to be an exciting and awesome adventure and certainly a unique
event for the residents of our communities.
Please mark July 14 on your social calendars as I am sure it will be an event
you will want to participate in. Additional information concerning the activ-
ities to be promoted as well as the involvement of the Council and Commission
will be forthcoming as details are worked out in the next week or two.
KV/js
lel
HAIIGE, SMITH, EIDE & IIELLER, P.A.
• ATTORNEYS AT LAW
CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS
9800 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 00122
PAUL H. 14AUGE
BRADLEY SMITH
KEVIN W. EIDE
DAVID G. KELLER
May 7, 1984
Mr. Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Roadside Fruit Stands and Sales Stand
Dear Tom:
AREA COOK 612
TZ"PHONZ 404.4224
I was asked by Mayor Blomquist to explore some questions relating to
the location and.expansion of fruit stands along public streets and also
questions about vendors of murals, tools, etc., who sell their products
either on public street right-of-way or private property adjacent to right-
of-way.
• 1. Is it permissible for a fruit and vegetable stand that has been located
on private property adjacent to a public street to continue to operate and
can it expand its operation without a City permit?
•
Under Eagan City Code Section 11.10, Subd. 3, the continued use, expansion or
rebuilding of any use existing upon the date of adoption of the City Code
is allowable. However, this is not interpreted to permit an initial develop-
ment in accordance with any repealed ordinance. The expansion or rebuilding
relates only to existing buildings or uses and also the expansion cannot be
so large as to constitute an initial development.
Eagan Ordinance Section 11.10, Subd. 3(C) requires a permit for expansion of
a nonconforming use but it's only applicable if the use was not preexisting
or grandfathered. It would have to be determined whether the fruit and vegetable
stand was in existence prior to adoption of the ordinance dealing with non-
conforming uses and if not it could not expand without acquiring a -nonconforming
use permit.
If a vendor is within the public right-of-way or is on public land he or she
must have a permit and follow the terms of the permit.
/5v
Mr. Hedges •
May 7, 1984
Page -Two
Another area that can be looked at in relation to these kinds of stands
is whether there is any public nuisance created such as excessive traffic,
safety problems, etc. This .may be grounds for controlling such stands even
though they may have been in existence for a long period of time.
2. Can vendors sell murals, tools, etc. without a license or permit on private
property or public street right-of-way?
Eagan City Code does not prohibit these sales under its solicitations section.
See Section The sale of products on residential property may
be violative of the Zoning Ordinance which requires it to be residential. If
a vendor offers to sell property within street righ-of-way, he or she would be
violating Eagan Ordinance 7.05, Subd. 1, which states as follows:
"It is a misdemeanor for any person to place, deposit, display or
offer for sale, any fence, goods, or other obstructions upon, over,
across, or under any street without first having obtained a written
permit from the Council, and then only in compliance in all respects
with all terms and conditions of such permit, and taking precautionary
measures for the protection of the public."
In addition, zoning provision Section 11.10, Subd. 9, forbids structures in •
public rights-of-way. It states:
"No building, structures, or uses may be located in or on any public
lands or right-of-way without approval of the Council."
Uses could be interpreted to include sales of goods.
It appears that if a vendor is within the public right of way or is on public
lands, he or she must have a permit and-mugt follow the terms of such permit.
skk
Very
PhelP H. Hauge V
City Attorney - City of Eagan
15,3
•
W a
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO, BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 0.54-8100
May 11, 1984
MR TOM GEGAX
T.H.A. MARKETING CONCEPTS
3760 WAYZATA BLVD
GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55416
RE: CITY OF EAGAN
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TIRES PLUS STANDARD
Dear Mr. Gegax:
BEA SLOM9UIST
�Aca
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
'ERRY THOMAS
THEODORE V.ACHIER
=a+�cr eromoa+�
-OMAS HEDGES
C:ro Arse zrwc
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
Please be advised' that it has been brought -to the attention of the
City that you have remodeled the Tires Plus Standard Service Station
without the appropriate building permit. The Building Inspection
Department has penalized you with the appropriate fee for failure to
obtain the permit prior to commencement of construction.
It has also been brought to our attention that during the remodeling
process you eliminated one of your restroom facilities, leaving only
one facility in the structure. It would appear that this is a
violation of the Uniform Building Code requiring two (2) such
facilities where an employer employs more than. four (4) people and
includes employees of both sex. The UBC by reference is a portion of
the Eagan City Code. Therefore, you are in violation of the City
Code.
It is the City's position that the Conditional Use Permit is
implicitly conditioned upon remaining in compliance with the
existing code. Therefore, you are required to correct the violation
prior to renewal of your Conditional Use Permit or accept the
possibility of non -renewal by the City Council.
Sincerely,
Dale--Pe`tefrson
Chief Building Official
CC: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator
Dale Runkle, City Planner
Parcel File
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
FOR MONTH OF January 1984
WORK PERFORMED •
TYPE MAN HOURS
Fire/Rescue 720
Training 484
Truck 6 Equipment Maintenance 131
Station Maintenance 143
Fire Prevention 25
Administrative 253
TOTAL 1756
MANPOWER STATION U1 STATION 02 STATION 03
Available Days 12 5 6
Available Nights 12 "jam— �—
Available Rotating 2 4 �"—
On Leave 1 —T—
TOTAL 27 23 16
FIRE/RESCUE •
. TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS
Structure 12 $10,000
Grass 0
Vehicle 4 1,700
False 3
Medical _ 5
Other 1.
TOTAL 28 $11,700
LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES
DATE NAME
LOCATION
OCCUPANCY
$ LOSS
1-9-84
Cedarvale Parking Lot
Car.
$ 700
1-9-84
4279 Lodgepole
Car
1,000
1-4-84
4158 Rahn Rd 015
Apartment
1,000
1-1-84
2030 Emerald
House
6,000
Revised 1-1-83
/5S
•
•
EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
FOR MONTH OF February 1984
WORK PERFORMED
$ LOSS
TYPE
MAN HOURS
Fire/Rescue
740
Training
342
Truck & Equipment Maintenance
131
Station Maintenance
129
Fire Prevention
42
Administrative
375
TOTAL
1759
MANPOWER
Available Days
Available Nights
Available Rotating
On Leave
TOTAL
• FIRE/RESCUE
TYPE
Structure
Grass
Vehicle
False
Medical
Other
TOTAL
LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES
DATE NAME
2-7-84
2-18-84
•
STATION 91
12
12
2
1
27
NUMBER
12
0
2
•4
2
1
21
LOCATION
3890 Lexington
4591 Greenleaf Dr.,
/S6
STATION 02 STATION 03
5 6
13 �^
4 — 1
23 16
$ LOSS
$7,400
$7,400
OCCUPANCY
$ LOSS
House
$6,000
House
2,000
Revised 1-1-83
May 24, 1984
/O-0/000- 030
MUNICIPAL OFFICES
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Fagan, Minnesota 55122
Attention: Mayor Bea Blomquist and Fagan City Councilmen
Dear Mayor Blomquist:
I attended a City Council Meeting on or around July 5, 1983, regarding
assessment on the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road (County laud #31). I
complained to the City for not obtaining an easement for upgrading the
road, storm sewers, etc. I was told to submit a letter within ten (10)
days of my complaints, which I did. Not receiving any response to my
letter I called City Hall around the 1st of the year. After several phone
calls I received some response from the City that there would be an adjust-
ment on the storm sewer and nothing more on the other complaints. I was
then advised the easement for the road was a County problem. I talked to
Dakota County and they said it was a City of Eagan responsibility to obtain
an easement.
In the past I have written the City with no response, leaving me with the
feeling these matters are riot being properly reviewed. I am requesting a
letter from the City of Fagan within thirty (30) days as to why they can
trespass on private property and upgrade a road without obtaining an ease- •
ment. Also,'I never received an itemized assessment statement from the
City on the upgrading of Pilot Knob.
I would appreciate your attention in this matter as soon as possible.
RLS/blw
cc: Mr. Fred Joy
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
1560 West Highway 55
Hastings, Minnesota 55033
Sincerely,
4-
L. Schaumburg
3160 Pilot Knob Rcad
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
/S%
•
of ecag a
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 0.54$100
May 30, 1984
Mr. Rodney L. Schaumburg
3160 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
RE: PARCEL #10-01000-030-32
PROJECT #200, PILOT KNOB ROAD UPGRADING
Dear Mr. Schaumburg:
f7/
BEA BLOMTDUIST
Mp
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
JERRY THOMAS
THEODORE WACHTER
Cw ,MB ,
THOMAS HEDGES
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
Gro coy
Your registered letter to the Mayor and City Council dated May 24th
has been forwarded to my attention for review and response. In
your letter, you indicate that you have contacted the City but have
never received a response leaving you with the feeling that matters
are not being properly reviewed. Maybe the documentation in this
letter, to your attention, will again remind you of the review per-
formed by the City and the action taken or decisions made in regards
to your complaints. In your most recent letter, you indicate that
you have not received an itemized assessment statement from the
City for the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. Enclosed please find
two copies of the "Statement of Special Assessment" for Project
#177 which dealt with the installation of storm sewer and Project
#200 which related directly to the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road and
of surfacing. These statements were sent out to all property owners
who were assessed under these projects informing them of the amount
of the assessment.
As you will note, it delineates a pay schedule with interest rates
and deadlines, etc. In addition, you will note that subsequent
to your complaint submitted at the assessment hearing of July 5,
1983, that the amount of the assessment levied on your property's
tax statement, due and payable in 1984, did not contain the $495.00
for the storm sewer laterial assessment. This was a direct result
of an investigation of your complaint and a determination made that
your property did not receive the benefit which was originally pro-
posed to be levied at the assessment hearing on July 5, 1983.
You also indicate that you talked with "Dakota County" regarding
the easement problem and you were informed that it was the City
of Eagan's responsibility to obtain the easement. It is difficult
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
/S9,
RODNEY L. SCHAUMBURG
MAY 30, 1984
PAGE 2
to believe that the County would inform you that it was the City's
responsibility to obtain the easements when it was their legal de-
partment who acquired all easements necessary to initiate County
Contract 31-05 (Pilot Knob Road). The City had to reimburse the
County a certain portion for the right-of-way acquisition costs
that were incurred by the County. Therefore, as you can see, it
was the full County responsibility to acquire all necessary ease-
ments. As you have been informed in the past by several different
agencies, the County determined that it already had legal right
to the existing 33 foot half right-of-way which you do not agree
with. Whether you agree with it or not, it has been determined
by the County Attorney's Office that that property was in fact
County right-of-way and no additional acquisition was necessary.
As you can see, there has been considerable response to your
numerous and continuous complaints to both the County and the City
regarding this project. It appears the problem is not in receiving
a response from the City or the County; but rather, receiving the
response that you want to hear.
•
Therefore, I feel that the City and County have properly responded
to your concerns and in the City's instance has taken appropriate
corrective action where necessary. Unless any new concerns are
brought forth that have not been previously discussed, I will con- •
sider the information contained in this letter to be the final
response from the City of Eagan.
Sincerely,
Thomas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
TAC:jbd
Enclosure
cc: The Mayor and City_Council
-c/o Thomas V. -Hedges, City Administrator,.-
•
/59
0
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
DATE: MAY 30, 1984
RE: FOOTINGS AT 3664 WOODTHRUSH CT
On a footing inspection, the inspector only sees the form
work and soil conditions. The form work shows the inspector
the building setbacks and building elevations.
The foundation inspection shows the inspector if the foot-
ing/foundation assembly is compatible. On this foundation
inspection, it was found that the bearing wall assemblies
were good, but the partition curb block • areas of the
• stairwell were out of place and they will be repaired when
the basement floor is poured. The structuralintegrity will
not be compromised at all.
DP/js
CC: Parcel File
140
C:
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
DATE: MAY 30, 1984
RE: RICK BODEKER D/B/A BLOOMINGTON PLATING
L 15, B 2, EAGANDALE #4
3330 MIKE COLLINS DR
The above referenced company moved into the referred building
sometime in March. We were unaware of their arrival, or the
nature of their business until we were in receipt of their
industrial sewer connection application on April 30 as indic-
ated on the copy of the enclosed application which we for-
warded at that time to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commis-
sion. Their permit #0178 was assessed 30 SAC units by the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Gould Battery and E&Q
Fabricators were the original tenants and they accounted for •
five (5) of the SAC units. They were deducted from the 30
that were assessed.
I have referred the use of the parcel for review to City
Planner, Dale Runkle, and the possibility of the sanitary
discharge being detrimental to the City Sewer System to
Public Works Director, Tom Colbert.
If you need further information, please contact me and I will
attempt to gather it for you.
DP/js
Encl.
CC: Tom Colbert, Public Works Director
Dale Runkle, City Planner
Parcel File
•
0
E. INDUSTRIAL: SEWER CONNECTION APPLICATION
Company name t. L) rh
33k 1) Mob �: I,,"1-7 ;' /v 225x3
Location seeress - -
Mailing address
Company Representative
Title JC, -x'. /, .
Phone number ry 7 - CfZ Iq
1. Nature of business'�rt�a'I'1= ^�"`( l:' 1': i4r ` ("
MWCC-7361
(Sn ❑ New building
2. Projected date for facility start up 1.1 Gr'I 1_ `I
3. Total facility area / ? G I~ c sp. ft.
4. No. of employees
5. Operating hours per day
fix Operating days per year
\❑/Building addition
® Existing building
7. Water supply. D
a. Municipal water supply L LCy gal/day
b. Well water supply gal/day
c. Other (specify) gal/day
d. Total water supply �000 gal/day
8. Waste discharge:
a. Sanitary waste discharge 120 gal/day
b. Uncontaminated cooling water discharge gal/day
1.) .... to sanitary sewer sal/day .
2.) .... to storm sewer sal/day ylJ, /�
c. Industrial waste discharge r • r cgal/day
d. Total discharge to sanitarysewer (Sa+gbl+gc) 1 i1y0c gal/day
9. SAC units: Total discharge (l30)
274 - 00 SAC Units /. 0- •�- 1 6
10. SAC Charge:1 DO 000 00 J�r1Q
SAC Units (9) 30 X Unit s J~00
Charge rya=,2 s0I4 S
SAC Charge
� 7t"
11. Pretreatment: [Refer to Sections 5-5 and 5-6 of the Waste Control Rules andRegulations.) Does the Company plan any in -plant
treatment of wastes? !ECL L[(`EA yes. describe 2015! 315' A �'(',TC_)A TPG Ric,inr (I�t T-t[ft.ivle
12. Sampling 6 Flow Measuring: [Refer to Section 5.9 of the
• Waste Control Rules and Regulations.] Indicate location of sewer
access
Ani i alAP�
point and describe flowmeter and means of sampling fT
'MTSt, ff)-ti
F),r) )
{z(, Ru `rcbT P,.j T -L P.uA'IC H MicTriof) SANIP►,Ir1�
�_i�OL)QI.�( G.PFl3 �ArIF1''S T!`•f=W61•t^�T ilii lti1CPCIsJC, �Y;
Ile I.
13. Discharge Quality.
3,0 elk i/4 -
C..30 m(DI-
0,0e ^GI&.
/IZMI./L
Resent Absent
(Check appropriate tax)
Constlhum
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
.........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
I.........
....................
..........
V
..........Solids
.......... Organics
.......... Acids
.......... Caustics
.......... Temperature (greater than 150'F)
.......... Cadmium
.......... Chromium
......... Copper
.......... Cyanide
..........Iron
..........Lead
.......... Mercury
.......... Nickel
......... Zinc
.......... Phenols
Grease and/or oil
.......... Solvents
Radioactive wastes
✓
V
]
P..........
-
MWCC-7717 '
14. Additional Information. sketches or descriptions may be attached for the purpose of adequately describing the waste discharge.
!!{{�'�� C CATION
This is to certify that Ba oc; f yi �i� t^S� N 1 a agrees to comply with the rules
(Co -mw Nuna)
and regulations governing connection to and use of the Metropolitan Disposal System. including obtaining an Indus.
trial discharge permit prior to th
Compan�Signature of of ficial)
Date
2) Trai
3)
Approved by Metro Titan W s Control Com ission W 4zr-, % % ii�,
Signature
Title
��foY
Date��S/s-f do
1`
d► -7g
/,.3
K,)ierJ
s/3/H
•
�,ut •
5�31$0-
OF
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
May 22, 1989
MR RICHARD NADEAU
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION
MN DEPT OF ENERGY 8 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
150 E KELLOGG BLVD
ROOM 900
ST PAUL MN 55101
Re: Certification For Entitlement Is
Bonds City of Eagan Minnesota
Dear Mr. Nadeau:
of Industrial
BEA SLON01=1
MOM
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
JERRY THOMAS
THEODORE WACHTER
Ca l Ma.nncs
THOMAS HEDGES
01y A�ftclo
EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE
G4 Cy
Enclosed is the City of Eagan's Certification to become an entitle-
ment issuer of industrial development bonds in the State of
Minnesota. The City of Eagan has chosen the program to become
an entitlement issuer which is one alternative available under
the allocation process adopted this year by the Minnesota Legisla-
ture.
The attached list of issues represent the bond transactions
that were either publicly sold or privately placed. There are
many other industrial development bond applications that received
public hearings before the City Council and either have preliminary
or final approval by the City of Eagan, however, official bonds
were never issued. Those applications are not represented as
a part of Certification and "the City of Eagan believes this
is consistent with the intent of the Legislature. If other
communities are including issues that are pending that were
never officially issued, then the City of Eagan should be allowed
to add those applications to its list for purposes of determining
the entitlement amount.
Thank you for your consideration
regarding the Certification by
to contact this office at any time.
and if there are any questions
the City of Eagan, feel free
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
TLH/jj
cc: Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance; Paul Hauge, City Attorney
THE LONE OAT( TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Ernie Clark, Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
CERTIFICATION •
Pursuant to Minn. Laws 1984, ch. 582 15 to be codified as Minn.
Stat. 474.18, subd. 2, the undersigned certify that City of
(name of local issuer as de intd by Minn.
Ea
5� (hereinafter the
Laws 194 ch. 5H 3 tai' o becoo ified as Minn. Stat. 474.16, subd. 2)
local issuer) issued obligations of a type subject to limitation
under the terms Section 721 of the Tax Reform Bill of 1984, H.R.
4170, as reported by the Ways and Means Committee of the United States
House of Representatives on March 5, 1984 (hereinafter "obligations")
listed herein for each of the four preceeding calendar years.
For each of the four preceeding calendar years list the total
principal amount of obligations issued by any issuer within the geogra-
phic boundaries covered by the local issuer. (For example, bonds
issued by port authorities or redevelopment authorities operating
within the geographic boundaries of the local issuer should be included
in these totals)
1980 $11,678,000 •
1981 1,350,000
1982 1,250,000
1983 34,336,000
For each obligation issued by the local issuer, each of the
four preceeding calendar years, list the following information:
Description of
Total Local Issuer Project with
Date of Principal if other than Respect to which
Issuance of Amount of Local Issuer the Obligation
1980 Obligation Obligation Listed above was issued
1981
1982 See Attached
1983
(Attach additional pages if necessary)
The following authorized official is designated for contact
by the Department of Energy and Economic Development:
Name Thomas L Hedges
Address 3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
May 21, 1984
nate
yOr
May 21, 1984
Data
A nay or Loca ssuer
•
3/24/83
$3,325,000
9/17/83
111001000
10/1/83
1,815,000
None
Unitog Rental Services -
Rental laundry facility
None
Greaser Inc., - Office and
Total
Local Issuer
Theodore A. Davies - Office
Date of
Principal
if other than
Description of Project With
Issuance of
Amount of
Local Issuer
Respect to which the
Obligation
Obligation
Listed Above
Obligation was Issued
5/9/80
$2,130,000
None
Rosemount, Inc. - Office
'
and manufacturing facility
7/15/80
848,000
None
Elliott Auto Supply Co. -
O£fice and warehouse facility
8/1/80
700,000
None
DCR Company - Bowling alley
expansion
12/19/80
5,500,000
None
Economics Laboratory - Addn.
to research and development
facility
12/30/80
2,500,000
None
Carson Pirie Scott Co. -
1980 Subtotal
$11,678,000
Warehouse and showroom
3/5/81
$950,000
None
Yankee Square Office I -
Office Building
- 9/28/81
400,000
None
John Henry Foster Co. -
1981 Subtotal
$1,350,000
Office and warehouse facility
8/25/82
$1,250,000
None
Yankee Square Office III
- Office Building
•'��'' 1982 Subtotal
$1,250,000
3/24/83
$3,325,000
9/17/83
111001000
10/1/83
1,815,000
12/14/83
1,391,000
12/30/83
705,000
12/30/83
20,000,000
12/30/83 6,000,000
1983 Subtotal 34,336,000
Grand Total $48,614,000
None
Yankee Square Inn - Hotel
None
Hillcrest Development -
Office building
None
Unitog Rental Services -
Rental laundry facility
None
Greaser Inc., - Office and
warehouse facility
None
Theodore A. Davies - Office
and warehouse facility
None
Minnesota Jockey Club -
Horse racing track and re-
lated facilities
None
Minnesota Jockey Club -
Horse racing track and
related facilities
4.6
MEMO TO: CITY COUNCILMEMBER JERRY THOMAS, CHIEF OF POLICE JAY
BERTHE, FIRE CHIEF BOB CHILDERS •
FROM: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: MAY 7, 1984
SUBJECT: MEETING TO DISCUSS NEW POLICY FOR RESCUE SQUAD CALLS
A meeting was held on Monday, May 7, 1984, at Perkins Restaurant
to discuss a new procedure that was initiated by the Police
and Fire Departments regarding the type of calls that the Fire
Department's rescue squad is called by the Police Department.
Until December 31, 1983, the rescue squad would be called on
most all accidents and medicals totalling some 350 during 1983.
A study was made by Administration in both Departments and it
was determined that many of the calls that were responded to
by the rescue squad the Police were able to handle on a first
response. It was determined by the Administration in both Depart-
ments that the rescue squad response was not necessary and therefore
would be limited to those emergencies where the dispatcher and/or
police officer decide the rescue squad is necessary.
City Councilmember Thomas, who asked for the meeting with City,
Police and Fire Administration, stated that volunteers from
the Fire Department are concerned that both medicals and accidents
have occurred since January of 1984 when the rescue squad was •
not called and more than likely should have been called by the
police dispatchers. Councilmember Thomas provided several instances
which included the following:
1. A January accident at T.H.13 and Cedar where cars were
flipped due to an accident and victims were in need of
backboards. There was no rescue squad called.
2. An accident in the general vicinity of Wescott and Pilot
Knob in approximately February or March and there was no
rescue called.
3. A concern was expressed regarding an infant who stopped
breathing as to why three squads were taken off the street
to respond to that problem when possibly one squad could
have adequately handled the emergency.
Other examples were cited and City Councilmember Thomas further
explained that the rescue squad had provided a quick response
in the past, has provided good public relations throughout the
community and given people a security that an emergency team
is available to help police assist in a first response to a
medical or accident. He further expressed concern about a liability
to the City if the rescue squad is not called when they could
have been available for an accident or medical.
Both Chief Berthe and Chief Childers stated that they, would •
review the specific instances that were raised by City Councilmember
Thomas as well as in detail the new procedure. Chief Childers
• MEMO
MAY 7, 1984
PAGE 2
stated that to date after four months in 1984 the rescue squad
has been called nine times. The City Administrator asked that
the Fire Department review the 350 calls last year to determine
how many of those calls could have been eliminated in comparison
to the policy that is in effect in 1984. Fire Chief Childers
stated that he is concerned about having enough volunteer fire-
fighters to man all three stations and if the same personnel
are called out on 300-400 rescue calls, this could jeopardize
the availability of manpower for operating all three stations.
He also expressed a concern that the firefighters do not have
enough emergency services training .if the rescue squad is going
to be properly manned and respond to more calls. Fire Chief
Childers also expressed a concern about adding more volunteers
to the Department, especially station number one. He explained
that this station has had a dramatic change in available volunteers
due to a recent retirement of several firefighters.
Both Police Chief Berthe and Fire Chief Childers stated that
they would review in detail the procedure and provide some addition-
al information on how this procedure is working in relationship
to the concerns that were raised by City Councilmember Thomas
and also specifically address the various incidents that were
reported by City Councilmember Thomas. It was suggested by
the City Administrator that a follow-up meeting be held to review
the findings of both Chief Berthe and Chief Childers.
(-\ \ " , '�' L
,')
City Administratou►
TLH/jj U
0
/691
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 19, 1984
EAGAN CITY HALL
CITY ATTORNEY
1. Odell vs. City of Eagan
2. McCarthy Easements
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the
"Engineering/Special Assessment Divisions"
i
2. Capital Equipment Acquisition
3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins
Addition
l6q
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 18, 1984
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
The following items are to be considered as a part of the Adminis-
trative Agenda:
CITY ATTORNEY
1. ODELL VS. CITY OF EAGAN-
As the City Council recalls the Minnesota Court of Appeals has
overruled the Trial Court in the case of Odell vs. City of Eagan
finding that the City Council did not have a valid basis for
denying the preliminary plat. The appellant court accurately points
out that the denial must be based upon sufficient reasons relative
to the City Ordinance. In the case of the Odell Lots, the only
apparent conflict with the Ordinance was in regard to the garage
which exists within set -back requirements. The Court of Appeals
has found that the garage was a non -conforming structure as distin-
guished from a non -conforming use. In their opinion, the sub-
division ordinance only addressed non -conforming uses unless, the
garage was not a valid basis for denial. Therefore, the City
Attorney is recommending that a resolution from the copies enclosed
on pages 1'7.+ through _1 -7,5 -be considered based on the recent
decision of the Court of Appeals.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To prove or deny the en-
closed resolution.
Expenses were incurred in the amount of $394.20 for the Supreme
Court, Court of Appeals and $1528.51 for witnesses and other
related expenses incurred by the appellants. The total cost for
the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals case was $1922.71. The
Odells' requested that the City consider total payment, however,
through negotiations and a dispute from the City Attorneys office
on payment of those expenses the total amount has been lowered to
$639.20. A motion is in order to consider payment in the amount
of $394.20 to the State of Minnesota for the Supreme Court, Court
of Appeals and to the Odell's in the amount of $245.00 with both
payments totaling $639.20.
/70
Administrative Agenda Information
June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting
Page Two
2. McCarthy Easements
The City Attorney, Director of Public Works and City Administrator
are making efforts to gain a desirable settlements for various
easements that are required for utility work through the McCarthy
property. In an effort to negotiate a reduction of approximately
$20,000 in interest costs, the City Attorney is planning to proceed
with the first day of trial and will report to the City Council
following the City Council tomorrow evening on the final status
of the City as it relates to our negotiations with McCarthy's
attorney. For a review of the easements which were discussed
by City Attorney Hauge with Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmembers
Smith and Wachter on Sunday evening, refer to pages 17 (. through
177 . Apparently, City Councilmember Thomas was unavailable
as is City Councilmember Egan who is on vacation.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
1. Personnel
Continuation of Internsh
ecial Assessment Division"
Within the
As a part of the 1984 budget, an engineering intern was authorized
for up to six months. Since this engineering intern is a civil
engineer and has been assisting with engineering tech work and
special assessments and due to the increased construction and
activity within engineering, it is desirable to continue the
internship for the remainder of 1984. The City Administrator
has discussed the position with the Director of Public Works
and feels the need is justified and is recommending consideration
by the City Council. The City Administrator also asked the Direc
for of Public Works to address the overall personnel needs in
engineering/special assessments, realizing that these needs will
be further addressed at the time of the 1985 budget development.
The Director of Public Works has prepared a memorandum describing
the intern needs at the present time and also the possibility
of more permanent employment in the future. Enclosed on pages
1716 through 1190 is a copy of the memo as prepared by the
Director of Public Works.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider approval or
denial of an internship program in the engineering department
for an additional six (6) months during calendar year 1984.
171
Administrative Agenda Information
June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting
Page Three
2. Capital Equipment Acquisition
As a part of the 1984 budget, a one ton dump truck with plow
and sander and a 32,000 GVW dump truck with plow were given review,
however final consideration was to be given during calendar year
1984 with the sale of equipment certificates. The Director of
Public Works has requested that these two (2) vehicles be purchased
during 1984 as explained in a memorandum enclosed on pages
III through Ig2. .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an
authorization for advertising for bids to consider the purchase
of a four wheel drive one ton dump truck and a 34,000 GVW dump
truck with front wing plow attachments with final approval and
authorization of equipment certificates at the time the bid is
awarded.
Special Note: For additional information on this item, refer
to page 48 of your 1984 budget.
3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters
A license application was received from the Eagan Hockey Boosters
for a combination gambling license to be used as a part of the
July 4 festivities. Enclosed is a copy of a letter from a repre-
sentative of the Eagan Hockey Boosters and the gambling license
application. The organization is requesting a waiver of the
license fee which is $25.00 and the $10,000 bond requirement.
It is the tradition of the City Council that the bond requirement
be waived, however, the license fee be collected to offset any
administrative charges. P.i83 —111-
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a
combination gambling license as requested by the Eagan Hockey
Boosters.
r-7.1,
Administrative Agenda Information
June.19,.1984 City Council Meeting_
Page Four
DIRECTOR OF'PUBLIC WORKS
1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins
Addition
The Robins Addition is located south of I-494 and west of T.H. 149
(old Dodd Road) incorporating east Blue Gentian Road. This prelimi-
nary plat received approval from the Council in November of
1981 and has received two previous extensions which expire on
June 15, 1984. They have requested a third extension to June
15, 1985, due to the fact that they have not yet completed the
technical process associated with trading rights-of-way and
property with MnDOT as a part of the progression of I-494.
It is anticipated that all formal documents and agreements would
be completed within the next 6 - 9 months which would allow
them to proceed with their final plat prior to June of 1985.
Due to the fact that this is the third request for an extension,
the staff would recommend that it be the final extension and
that the developers be so informed.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third
and final extension of the preliminary plat approval for the
Robins Addition with the final expiration date of June 15, 1985.
1-73
RESOLUTION
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
JUNE _, 1984
WHEREAS, an application was submitted by David and Patricia Odell in
August of 1982 for a preliminary plat to split Lot 2, in McCarthy Ridge
Addition into two single family lots exceeding the minimum size requirements
for single family lots; and
WHEREAS, in August and again on October 5, 1982, the Eagan City Council
denied said application; and
WHEREAS, the applicants, David and Patricia Odell, appealed to the
Minnesota Court of Appeals from the Dakota County District Court's Order and
Judgment finding in favor of the City of Eagan; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Court of Appeals determined in its decision filed
May 8, 1984 that the Dakota County District Court should issue an Order
directing the City Council to grant the applicants a preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, the Dakota County District Court by an Order dated May 24, 1984
directed the City Council to grant approval of the appellants' preliminary
plat of Odell Addition as submitted without further delay or appearance by the
Odells;
NOW THEREFORE, upon motion duly made �y
by , it was RESOLVED as follows:
and seconded
1. That the Eagan City Council be and hereby is on record approving the
preliminary plat application of Odell Addition, subject to the following
conditions:
a. Park dedication requirements for the new lot shall be met by
cash donation of the standard single family lot amount of $420.00.
b. The preliminary plat shall be subject to Minnesota Department
of Transportation's review and comment because the plat abuts State
rights-of-way.
C. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff.
d. The applicant shall be required to provide sewer and water
service to the. newly -created lot.
e. Additional per lot trunk area assessments should be paid for
the additional lot at the rates in effect at the time of final plat
approval for trunk area sanitary sewer and water area assessments as a
condition of this plat approval.
f. This development shall accept its financial responsibility for
trunk area storm sewer assessments for one additional lot in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
g. Developer shall comply with all applicable City Code
provisions.
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated:
CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAGAN
BY:
1-75-
2
Its: City Clerk
HAucE, SB=. EIDE & FELLER, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS
9808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
FAGAN. MINNESOTA 89122
PAUL H. HAUGE
BRADLEY SMITH
KEVIN W. EIDE
DAVID D. KELLER June 18, 1984
Mr. Arnold Rempe
Attorney at Law
One Signal Hills
Nest St. Paul, MN 55118
RE: Eagan - McCarthy Property Easements
Dear Arnold:
ARG COOL 812
T[LIPMONI 484-4224
On Sunday, June 17, 1984, we discussed proposed terms for the settlement of
various easements from the McCarthy family running to the City of Eagan
covering both the north 80 acre parcel lying generally north of Wescott Road
and the south 70 acres south of Wescott Road. These terms gene rally.are as
follows:
1. McCarthys will grant a pond easement for Hurley Lake at an 830 elevation,
according to the legal description.
2. An easement for storm sewer utility purposes over the North 20 feet
running westerly of Hurley Lake will also be granted. Temporarily a
gravel access shall be used by the City over such easement for mainten-
ance access to the storm sewer lift station. At such time as the
property in the vicinity of Hurley Lake is developed, the City will
remove the gravel service road and relocate the maintenance access to the
lift station.
3. The City will relinquish the acquisition of the westerly arm of the
Hurley Lake and quit claim that area to the McCarthys.
4. McCarthys will grant an easement for the northeasterly ponds within the
south 70 acre parcel at approximately 830 elevation.
5. An easement will be granted for sanitary sewer trunk purposes across the
south 70 acres as described by legal description in the condemnation
action now in process.
6. A further easement for storm sewer trunk purposes lying parallel and
within the 20 foot permanent sanitary sewer trunk easement, together with
necessary temporary construction easement for trunk storm sewer and trunk
sanitary sewer through approximately June 30, 1985 will be conveyed.
1-76
Arnold Kempe
June 18, 1984
Page 2
7. An easement will be granted generally according to a sketch submitted to
you on Friday, June 15, 1984, running from the Patrick Eagan Park Lake on
the south, northerly to connect with the proposed storm sewer trunk
consisting of a 20 foot wide permanent and necessary temporary construc-
tion easement.
8. The water trunk easement appeal generally covering the north 80 acres
will be dismissed by the McCarthys. It is understood that no other
easements have formally been levied but that there are pending trunk area
storm sewer assessments and that the McCarthys will not pursue appeals of
those easements, although no committment by the McCarthys is made at the
present time.
9. The City will pay the McCarthys $165,000.00 plus interest at the rate of
11% per annum computed since September 1981 at which time the City gained
access for trunk storm sewer construction purposes on the north 80 acre
property. All interest accrued on deposits made by the City with the
Dakota County Clerk of District Court will be credited toward such
interest.
10. The condemnation file 092213 covering Hurley Lake will be continued until
a formal agreement is entered amongst the parties and upon execution of
the agreement, that condemnation action will be dismissed as well as the
sanitary sewer trunk condemnation file 096510.
PHH:ras
Very truly yours,
HAUGE, SMITH, EIDE &.KELLER, P.A.
Paul H. Hauge '
177
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 19, 1984
EAGAN CITY HALL
CITY ATTORNEY
1. Odell vs. City of Eagan
2. McCarthy Easements
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the
"Engineering/Special Assessment Divisions"
2. Capital Equipment Acquisition
3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins
Addition
16q
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 18, 1984
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
The following items are to be considered as a part of the Adminis-
trative Agenda:
CITY ATTORNEY
1. ODELL VS. CITY OF EAGAN-
As the City Council recalls the Minnesota Court of Appeals has
overruled the Trial Court in the case of Odell vs. City of Eagan
finding that the City Council did not have a valid basis for
denying the preliminary plat. The appellant court accurately points
out that the denial must be based upon sufficient reasons relative
to the City Ordinance. In the case of the Odell Lots, the only
apparent conflict with the Ordinance was in regard to the garage
which exists within set -back requirements. The Court of Appeals
has found that the garage was a non -conforming structure as distin-
guished from a non -conforming use. In their opinion, the sub-
division ordinance only addressed non -conforming uses unless, the
garage was not a valid basis for denial. Therefore, the City
Attorney is recommending that a resolution from the copies enclosed
on pages )7,+ through _175- be considered based on the recent
decision of the Court of Appeals.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To prove or deny the en-
closed resolution.
Expenses were incurred in the amount of $394.20 for the Supreme
Court, Court of Appeals and $1528.51 for witnesses and other
related expenses incurred by the appellants. The total cost for
the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals case was $1922.71. The
Odells' requested that the City consider total payment, however,
through negotiations and a dispute from the City Attorneys office
on payment of those expenses the total amount has been lowered to
$639.20. A motion is in order to consider payment in the amount
of $394.20 to the State of Minnesota for the Supreme Court, Court
of Appeals and to the Odell's in the amount of $245.00 with both
payments totaling $639.20.
!-7o
Administrative Agenda Information
June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting
Page Two
2. McCarthy Easements
The City Attorney, Director of Public Works and City Administrator
are making efforts to gain a desirable settlements for various
easements that are required for utility work through the McCarthy
property. In an effort to negotiate a reduction of approximately
$20,000 in interest costs, the City Attorney is planning to proceed
with the first day of trial and will report to the City Council
following the City Council tomorrow evening on the final status
of the City as it relates to our negotiations with McCarthy's
attorney. For a review of the easements which were discussed
by City Attorney Hauge with Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmembers
Smith and Wachter on Sunday evening, refer to pages 17 (� through
17'7_. Apparently, City Councilmember Thomas was unavailable
as is City Councilmember Egan who is on vacation.
ADMINISTRATOR
1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the
"Engineering Special Assessment Division"
As a part of the 1984 budget, an engineering intern was authorized
for up to six months. Since this engineering intern is a civil
engineer and has been assisting with engineering tech work and
special assessments and due to the increased construction and
activity within engineering, it is desirable to continue the
internship for the remainder of 1984. The City Administrator
has discussed the position with the Director of Public Works
and feels the need is justified and is recommending consideration
by the City Council. The City Administrator also asked the Direc
for of Public Works to address the overall personnel needs in
engineering/special assessments, realizing that these needs will
be further addressed at the time of the 1985 budget development.
The Director of Public Works has prepared a memorandum describing
the intern needs at the present time and also the possibility
of more permanent employment in the future. Enclosed on pages
1716 through 1130 is a copy of the memo as prepared by the
Director of Public Works.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider approval or
denial of an internship program in the engineering department
for an additional six (6) months during calendar year 1984.
171
Administrative Agenda Information
June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting
Page Three
2. Capital Equipment Acquisition
As a part of the 1984 budget, a one ton dump truck with plow
and sander and a 32,000 GVW dump truck with plow were given review,
however final consideration was to be given during calendar year
1984 with the sale of equipment certificates. The Director of
Public Works has requested that these two (2) vehicles be purchased
during 1984 as explained in a memorandum enclosed on pages
/,il through A-1--
ACTION
-2.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an
authorization for advertising for bids to consider the purchase
of a four wheel drive one ton dump truck and a 34,000 GVW dump
truck with front wing plow attachments with final approval and
authorization of equipment certificates at the time the bid is
awarded.
Special Note: For additional information on this item, refer
to page 48 of your 1984 budget.
3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters
A license application was received from the Eagan Hockey Boosters
for a combination gambling license to be used as a part of the
July 4 festivities. Enclosed is a copy of a letter from a repre-
sentative of the Eagan Hockey Boosters and the gambling license
application. The organization is requesting a waiver. of the
license fee which is $25.00 and the $10,000 bond requirement.
It is the tradition of the City Council that the bond requirement
be waived, however, the license fee be collected to offset any
administrative charges. 0.193
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a
combination gambling license as requested by the Eagan Hockey
Boosters.
Administrative Agenda Information
June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting
Page Four
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins
Addition
The Robins Addition is located south of I-494 and west of T.H. 149
(old Dodd Road) incorporating east Blue Gentian Road. This prelimi-
nary plat received approval from the Council in November of
1981 and has received two previous extensions which expire on
June 15, 1984. They have requested a third extension to June
15, 1985, due to the fact that they have not yet completed the
technical process associated with trading rights-of-way and
property with MnDOT as a part of the progression of I-494.
It is anticipated that all formal documents and agreements would
be completed within the next 6 - 9 months which would allow
them to proceed with their final plat prior to June of 1985.
Due to the fact that this is the third request for an extension,
the staff would recommend that it be the final extension and
that the developers be so informed.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third
and final extension of the preliminary plat approval for the
Robins Addition with the final expiration date of June 15, 1985.
i-73
fr ✓�`
LESOLUTION
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
JUNE _, 1984
WHEREAS, an application was submitted by David and Patricia Odell in
August of 1982 for a preliminary plat to split Lot 2, in McCarthy Ridge
Addition into two single family lots exceeding the minimum size requirements
for single family lots; and
WHEREAS, in August and again on October 5, 1982, the Eagan City Council
denied said application; and
WHEREAS, the applicants, David and Patricia Odell, appealed to the
Minnesota Court of Appeals from the Dakota County District Court's Order and
Judgment finding in favor of the City of Eagan; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Court of Appeals determined in its decision filed
May 8, 1984 that the Dakota County District Court should issue an Order
directing the City Council to grant the applicants a preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, the Dakota County District Court by an Order dated May 24, 1984
directed the City Council to grant approval of the appellants' preliminary
plat of Odell Addition as submitted without further delay or appearance by the
Odells;
MA
NOW THEREFORE, upon motion duly made �y
. it was RESOLVED as follows:
and seconded
1. That the Eagan City Council be and hereby is on record approving the
preliminary plat application of Odell Addition,. subject to the following
conditions:
a. Park dedication requirements for the new lot shall be met by
cash donation of the standard single family lot amount of $420.00.
b. The preliminary plat shall be subject to Minnesota Department
of Transportation's review and comment because the plat abuts State
rights-of-way.
C. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff.
d. The applicant shall be required to provide sewer and water
service to the.newly-created lot.
e. Additional per lot trunk area assessments should be paid for
the additional lot at the rates in effect at the time of final plat
approval for trunk area sanitary sewer and water area assessments as a
condition of this plat approval.
f. This development shall accept its financial responsibility for
trunk area storm sewer assessments for one additional lot in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
g. Developer shall ,comply with all applicable City Code
provisions.
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated:
CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAOAN
BY:
175'
2
Its: City Clerk
HAUGE, SMITH. EIDE & HELLER, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS
9808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 88122
PAUL M. HAUGE
BRADLEY SMITH
KEVIN W. EIOE
DAVID O. KELLER
Mr. Arnold Rempe
Attorney at Law
One Signal Hills
Hest St. Paul, MN 55118
HE: Eagan - McCarthy Property Easements
Dear Arnold:
June 18, 1984
ARRA COD[ 012
T[LIJHON[ 4x4.4224
On Sunday, June 17, 1984, we discussed proposed terms for the settlement of
various easements from the McCarthy family running to the City of Eagan
covering both the north 80 acre parcel lying generally north of Wescott Road
and the south 70 acres south of Wescott Road. These terms generally are as
follows:
1. McCarthys will grant a pond easement for Hurley Lake at an 830 elevation,
according to the legal description.
2. An easement for storm sewer utility purposes over the North 20 feet
running westerly of Hurley Lake will also be granted. Temporarily a
gravel access shall be used by the City over such easement for mainten-
ance access to the storm sewer lift station. At such time as the
property in the vicinity of -Hurley Lake is developed, the City will
remove the gravel service road and relocate the maintenance access to the
lift station.
3. The City will relinquish the acquisition of the westerly arm of the
Hurley Lake and quit claim that area to the McCarthys.
4. McCarthys will grant an easement for the northeasterly ponds within the
south 70 acre parcel at approximately 830 elevation.
5. An easement will be granted for sanitary sewer trunk purposes across the
south 70 acres as described by legal description in the condemnation
action now in process.
6. A further easement for storm sewer trunk purposes lying parallel and
within the 20 foot permanent sanitary sewer trunk easement, together with
necessary temporary construction easement for trunk storm sewer and trunk
sanitary sewer through approximately June 30, 1985 will be conveyed.
Arnold Rempe
June 18, 1984
Page 2
7. An easement will be granted generally according to a sketch submitted to
you on Friday, June 15, 1984, running from the Patrick Eagan Park Lake on
the south, northerly to connect with the proposed storm sewer trunk
consisting of a 20 foot wide permanent and necessary temporary construc-
tion easement.
8. The water trunk easement appeal generally covering the north 80 acres
will be dismissed by the McCarthys. It is understood that no other
easements have formally been levied but that there are pending trunk area
storm sewer assessments and that the McCarthys will not pursue appeals of
those easements, although no committment by the McCarthys is made at the
present time.
9. The City will pay the McCarthys $165,000.00 plus interest at the rate of
11% per annum computed since September 1981 at which time the City gained
access for trunk storm sewer construction purposes on the north 80 acre
property. All interest accrued on deposits made by the City with the
Dakota County Clerk of District Court will be credited toward such
interest.
10. The condemnation file 092213 covering Hurley Lake will be continued until
a formal agreement is entered amongst the parties and upon execution of
the agreement, that condemnation action will be dismissed as well as the
sanitary sewer trunk condemnation file 096510.
PHH:ras
Very truly yours,
HAUGE, SMITH, EIDE & KELLER, P.A.
Paul H. Hauge
177
MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: JUNE 15, 1984
SUBJECT: PERSONNEL NEEDS - ENGINEERING/SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIVISIONS
As the City continues to grow so does the demand for services
of the Public Works Department through its Engineering and Special
Assessment Divisions. I have recently analyzed our workload
requirements and our available personnel in the Special Assessment
Division and have determined that there currently is a greater
workload than can be handled by the existing 1.5 employees.
Not only does the Special Assessment Division tabulate, spread,
certify and keep track of all final assessments associated with
public improvement contracts, but they are constantly requested
to provide information pertaining to past, present and pending
assessments everytime the ownership of a parcel changes. As
an example, every building permit issued through the Building
Inspection Department (which appears to be record setting each
year) requires a special assessment search and history on that
particular parcel by the builder, realtor or property owner.
In addition to these, every subdivision or lot split of an existing
parcel that either occurs at the County without our knowledge
or is processed through the City through our platting procedures,
require a subdivision of the records pertaining to assessments
along with a special assessment search as requested by the existing
and new property owners. While both of these items are associated
with growth and development of property, there is also the resale
of existing property that requires the same amount of research
in response to those requests. In 1983, approximately 1,500
special assessment searches had to be performed. The 1983 Annual
Report can provide further documentation to the work-related
statistics associated with this Division.
Assuming that the City's growth will no longer continue, present
manpower is necessary to maintain the records and provide the
information for the parcels currently existing within the City.
Assuming a fairly steady rate of growth with the projected comple-
tion of the interstate and available land to be developed, addi-
tional personnel is required to insure that this future development
occurs in an orderly manner to protect the City's financial
interests associated with the public improvements necessary to
accommodate this growth.
One of the most important steps in the development process is
the final plat application. It is at this point that the City
performs considerable research to determine outstanding past
and future assessment obligations. In addition, it is when legal
descriptions, street names, addresses, utility/ponding easements,
and City files and records are created which become the permanent
basis for the City's information system. Presently, this final
MEMO TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR
JUNE 15, 1984
PAGE TWO
plat process has been performed by the Public Works Director with
limited assistance being available from the Engineering and Special
Assessment Divisions. Subsequently, this process is not being
followed through with the degree of accuracy that is necessary to
protect the financial integrity of the City's operations along
with eliminating corrective work by other City personnel at a
later date which is time consuming and..inefficient based on our
work loads and time available.
The Engineering Division currently consists of the Assistant City
Engineer and two engineering technicians. One technician handles
all the administrative functions associated with street lights,
subdivision financial guarantees, as -built files, drainage com-
plaint investigations, etc. The other technician performs the
technical field work associated with inspections, surveying, pond
elevations, drafting, quantity calculations, etc.
With the Assistant City Engineer being responsible for 15-20
private developments within the City, grading permits applications,
review of new subdivision applications and related technical plans,
etc., the miscellaneous map updating, easement record keeping,
general assistance for research projects, etc. is presentlybeing
performed by a temporary intern position authorized with the 1984
budget which expires July 1. With the sealcoating program expand-
ing each year, street striping, traffic counts, greater accuracy
in easement acquisition/recording, inspection of in-house developed
contracts, the Engineering Division will be severely short staffed
if this intern position is terminated on July 1.
Therefore, I would like to request serious consideration of
authorizing the continuation of this intern program through the
completion of 1984 so that a more detailed analysis can be performed
for justification of requesting a full-time engineering technician
position as a part of the 1985 budget process.
The continuation: of this intern position and the hopeful evolution
into a full-time, permanent technician position would provide
considerable assistance to both the Engineering and the Special
Assessment Divisions in the final plat process and all related
documentation requirements. Please take into consideration the
fact that a considerable amount time spent by this intern has been
charged to City contracts which will be reimbursed through the 278
overhead portion of the special assessments. Therefore, I am
confident that a continuation of this position through the comple-
tion of 1984 will not create a financial burden to the general
budget and will greatly increase the Public Works Department's
ability to provide the level of service that is being demanded by
the growing public in Eagan.
While I realize that this memo appears to be excessive in length,
I assure you its brevity is a shortcoming to an adequate explanation
179
MEMO TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR
JUNE 15, 1984
PAGE THREE
of the level of service and detail associated with the work require-
ments currently being encountered by the Public Works Department
and certainly to be expanded as the City continues to grow.
Therefore, please inform me if we can receive the authorization
to continue this intern position through 1984 so that I can inform
the individual involved. Any additional information that may
be necessary will be gladly and promptly forwarded to your attention
as requested.
Respectfully submitted,
� jS�1���C!'t>�
homas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
TAC/kf
cc: Rich Hefti, Assistant City Engineer
Ann Goers, Special Assessment Clerk
!80
MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: JUNE 15, 1984
SUBJECT: CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION - PUBLIC WORKS STREET
MAINTENANCE - REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLES #101 & #113
As a part of the 1984 budget, I submitted to the City Council for
consideration a request to replace two existing vehicles in the
Public Work Street Maintenance Division. These vehicles are
identified as follows:
VEHICLE #101. This is a 1976 Ford 1/2 ton pickup truck which
presently has 94,000 miles on it. Because of its limited
weight capacity, this vehicle is used primarily for manpower
transportation and parts running. Except for our larger pieces
of equipment (graders, dump trucks, etc.), this is the oldest
vehicle in the Public Works Maintenance Division. Due to its
mileage, age and body condition, limited repairs have been
performed and this vehicle has been relegated to nominal usage.
VEHICLE #113. This vehicle is i 1972 International Harvester
34,000 G.V.W. dump truck. This 12 year old vehicle has 95,700
miles with a deteriorating body. It is the oldest maintenance
vehicle in our fleet and is quickly deteriorating through the
heavy use that it receives in our gravel road and snow removal
maintenance programs. Similar to vehicle #112, which was re-
placed in 1983, this vehicle is starting to experience substan-
tial repair work at inopportune times (snow plowing) which
restricts its dependability and reliability for emergency snow
removal services.
In recommending the replacement for these vehicles, the Superinten-
dent of Streets and myself have taken into consideration the maximum
flexibility of various vehicles and the overall needs of the
Maintenance Division. Based on our review, we concur with our
previous request to receive authorization to purchase the following
vehicles:
REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLE #101. This replacement is proposed
to be a small 4 wheel drive one ton dump truck with plow and
sander to augment our cul-de-sac snow removal fleet and provide
additional ice control with another sanding unit. This vehicle
would be identical to the two vehicles purchase in 1983 for
our cul-de-sac snow removal fleet. Last winter's record snow
falls proved these vehicles to be well worth the investment
and greatly increased our cul-de-sac snow removal efficiency
as compared to previous vehicles. In addition, their ability
to perform sanding for effective ice control proved their
MEMO TO THOMAS L. HEDGES
JUNE 15, 1984
PAGE 2.
flexibility to be a valuable piece of equipment. The estimated
cost of this vehicle with the plow and sander is approximately
$19,500. An estimated $500 trade in for existing vehicle #101
has been taken into consideration in the estimated cost.
REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLE #113. This replacement vehicle would
be of like kind to vehicle #113. It would be a 34,000 G.V.W.
dump truck complete with front and wing plow attachments.
This would be the similar specifications for the vehicle that
was approved for acquisition in 1983. This vehicle is large
enough to handle our mainline snow plowing and ice control
needs and yet small enough to provide maximum flexibility for
year round seasonal use such as street patching with our new
tailgate paver, gravel road maintenance, etc. The estimated
cost of this vehicle with related plow attachments is'approxi-
mately $53,000. This takes into consideration a $3,000 trade
in for existing vehicle #113.
As the Council may recall, with winter's heavy snow accumulation
and poor condition of our older. pieces of equipment, there were
times when 408 of our snow removal fleet was unavailable, inactive
or under repair. In addition, with last year's replacement vehicles
being ordered in the end of July, we have yet to receive our large
dump truck due .to the lead time required to manufacture these
specialized pieces of equipment.
Therefore, I would like to strongly urge the City Council to give
serious consideration to approving this request so that advertise-
ment for bids can be initiated as soon as possible to try and insure
that these new vehicles would be available for our snow removal
program of 1984 - 85.
I would be happy to review any of the vehicles with yourself or
the City Council, at your convenience, to discuss in further detail
our reasons and justifications for requesting replacement at this
time. Please let me know if any additional information is necessary
for consideration of this item by the City Council at their meeting
on June 19, 1984.
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas A. Colbert
TAC:jbd
CC: Bill Branch, Superintendent of Streets/Equipment
19�,
NEWSLETTER
FAGAM
Hockey Boosters, Inc.
Volume:
Number:
Date: -jL,..2 Q 1C I � ��
7011M #OCKFY FOR FAGAM
AND SUR R OUMD/NG COMM MI FS&
c;Ty 43� �-C'�
C,
6
M 010
O
i
4.Cb-y $o 4S E/LS
IS 3
I
Fee:
Annual:
Event Only
CITY OF EAGAN
BINGO AND/OR GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION
Date Submitted:
APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED
AT LEAST 30 DAYS PRIOR TO EVENT.
Type of License(s) requested: Bingo Paddlewheel
Tipboard Raffle
X cam" kr_f -t s-+
Name of Organization: � c, a � ..r v} , eke., do,.cTaier
I,
and I 40n4a.-
zation Name of Designated Bingo and/(
Gambling Manager,
/o -1 - q5 (first, middle, last)
Manager -Date of Birth
Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct the game(s) indicated
above in accordance with the provisions of the City of Eagan's Ordinance No. 70 and
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349.
Authorized OfficePr of Organization ...Designated Bingo and/or Gambling Manager of Organizatic
A. The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer of the
organization: ��// 1
1. TRUE NAME: ^oT �L,., ��, w �l�A L F_0 v4vLS
Last First FullMiddle
2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: ,ck -3 a�
Street City St a zip
3. DATE OF BIRTH: / c // 4. PLACE OF BIRTH: N i&.,v
MOnth,Da ,Year City,Sta vs?tf.
S. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic
offense? Yes No_
If yes, explain
B. The following is to be completed by the designated bingo and/or gambling
manager of the organization:
1. TRUE NAME: E/2�Zx 40,✓ D A-c.t- dF6aZ,•%0A_77'f
Last First FullMiddle
2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: 39(40 �LLMVLE 6)"AAJ YN1pj
Street City State zip
3. DATE OF BIRTH: (o aG Y7)_4. PLACE OF BIRTH: WiZLjN/}�t
Month,Day,Year City,S—tate
5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic
offense? Yes No
If yes, explain
6. How long have you been a member of the organization?_
7. Are you gambling manager for any other organization? �O
8. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action
designating you bingo and/or gambling manager.
I`G9'
GAME INFORMATION:
1.
�p
Plac[,(e where games will be/�played' �a. }� „i Sc `-.00 L r q K k
l
C( / I 1 �CnN fpS1 bJG 0.4 -Q9=1N �1�NN S-3 /Q
Street Cit State Zip
2.
Are premises owned or leased by sponsoring organization?
3.
Date or dates games will be played
Date and/or da (s) of week
4.
Hours of the day games will be played:From_LL__A.M. to P.M.
—A. M. tofI_P.M.
5.
Maximum number of players V000
6.
Number and value of prizes to be awarded
ORGANIZATION INFORMATION:
1.
Address where regular meetings are held I3$r/ bf0paKk
Street City
2.
Day and time of meetings -i.. [ s 7 3 o ,0 ,.. — hyT cA h., I b�
3.
Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of the
State of Minnesota? Yes x No
4.
How long has the organization been in existence? 12
5.
How many members in the organization? b
6.
�
What is the pLLu��rpose of the organization? 1'ac v,•CQp ax r k.
7. -E ul c=3_on-
7 X YOfficers�ofwthe Organization:
NAME ADDRESS (street,city,zirl / TITLE
8
wive names or officers or any other persons paid for services to
the organization:
NAME ADDRESS (3treet,city, ziFl TITLE
9. In whose custody will organization records be kept? n
NAME ADDRESS .a ).$4 It j'/ c1
street,city,state,zip
SS7�
Business Telephone Number `( SS / O
Home Telephone Number
jqs'
10. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate
the players in the event any injury is sustained by played while
participating in the bingo and/or gambling game, or while on
the licensed premises, please state the: -'
NAME OF INSURER Dy aHl I( POLICY NO
11. Have you (Manager and Officer) read, and do you thoroughly under-
stand the provisions of all lacus, ordinance, and regulations
governing the operation of bingo and/or gambling games?'
12. Attach a list of aIll active members of the organization.
I declare that the information I have provided on this application is truth-
ful, and I authorize the City of Eagan to investigate the information sub-
mitted. Also, I have received from the City of Eagan a copy of the City
Ordinance No. 70 relating to bingo and/or gambling, d I have familiarized
myself with the contents and requirements therof.
y ) n==,., S, K1c �, N jLk ,
Signature of authorize o ficer of the organizat
—
Dace I
Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this day of
Signature of Notary Public
Commission expires on
Signature of designated bingo and/or gambling manager
of organization.
Date
Subscribed and sworn to me a notary public on -this day of
Signature of Notary Public
Commission expires on
PLEASE PRINT
Date: June S, L91*
NAME
J; W1
�p,e L N�PrrfG�'�
`V-�,
IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK
PLEASE SIGN HERE
37so So. l e,e we Tart
z�- SDs
•
C
•
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY HALL
JUNE 5, 1984
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL 6 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA S APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
A. Fire Department
B. Police Department
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
C. Park S Recreation Department
D. Public Works Department
p.v A. Contractor Licenses
5 B. Personnel Items
G C. Contract 83-13, Final Payment/Acceptance (Park Ridge
Addition, et' al)
�.(o D. Contract 83-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Treatment Plant
Utilities)
E. Contract 84-8, Approve Williams Pipeline Encroachment
1 Agreement
g F. National Flag Day
p.JOG. Resignation of Douglas McNeely/Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission Member
Pp.11 -H. Contract 83-5, Approve Change order 01 (Water Treatment
Plant - Utilities and Streets)
F.171- I. Contract 83-5, Change Order o2 (Water Treatment Plant -
Streets and Utilities)
j3 J. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order
Public Hearing (St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition)
K. Contract 83-1, Change Order 05, Water Treatment Plant
(Control Valves)
p15 L. Final Plat Application, Century Addition
Y
11M. Final Plat Application, Suncliff 2nd Addition
f.IyN. Final Plat Application, Holmes Addition
rs10. Grading Permit Application, Lexington Place South and
Lexington Place 2nd Addition
z1 -P. Final Plat P Application, Safari Addition -LiQ. Project 411, Review Request/Authorize Feasibility Report,
P Patrick Eagan Park (Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet)
V. T:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
p 1.5 A. Project 404, Lexington Place South (Streets 6 Utilities)
1 63 B. Project 400, Oak Cliff Pond (Lift Station 6 Force Main
Outlet)
p,jLC. Project 398, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Streets d Utilities)
(Continued from 5-15-84 Meeting)
p.91 D. Vacate Utility Easment, Lakeside Estates
P.0 E. Vacate Street Easement, Twinview Manor 2nd Addition
1
VI.
VII.
IR
X.
RI.
OLD.BUSINESS
p 95 A. Alan J. 8 Baerbel C. Draenckhahn for Rezoning from A •
I (Agricultural District) to RB (Roadside Business District)
Consisting of Approximately .68 Acres in Part of the SE1/4
of the NE 1/4 of Section 4, T -27N, R -23W (Will be continued
J to a future City Council meeting)
�p}l B. Contract 84-11, Approve Plans 6 Specifications/Authorize
Advertisement for Bids (Oak Cliff Pond)
NEW BUSINESS
101 A. Sienna Corporation (Rod Hardy) for Preliminary Plat, Birch
P Park Addition, Consisting of Approximately 43 Acres a
Containing 77 Dwelling Units in Outlots B, C, D, E and F,
Windcrest 2nd Addition
P. 110 B. Corporate Construction for Waiver of Plat to Split a Duplex
Lot for Individual Ownership, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition,
Lot 2, Block 1, in the SW 1/2, Section 25 i
'p.115 C. Suncliff Development Company for a Variance from the
Sideyard Setback Along a Public Street, Suncliff 1st
Addition, in the NW 1/4 of Section 29
D. NW. Mutual Life Insurance for a Resolution Providing for a
Concurrent Detachment and Annexation of Incorporated Land,
in the N 1/2 of Section 3
ADDITIONAL ITEMS
133 A. Municipal Center Landscaping •
p r3`i B. Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission
p13(,C. Contract 84-6, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for
p Bids (Sealcoating)
13j D. Contract 84-14, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for
P AA Bids (Lexington Place 2nd Addition s Lexington Place South)
E. Contract 84-15, Approve Plans/Aurhorize Advertisement for
P Bids (SunCliff 2nd Addition)
VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
ADJOURNMENT
0
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
• FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: MAY 31, 1984
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION MEMO FOR JUNE 5, 1984, CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
After approval of the May 15, 1984, regular City Council minutes
and special City Council meeting minutes for December 22, 1983,
January 10, 1984, March 27, 1984 and May 24, 1984, and the agenda
for the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting, the following items
are in order for consideration.
•DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
A. Fire Department -- There are no items to be considered
under Fire Department at this time.
B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered
under Police Department at this time.
C. Parks and Recreation Department -- There are ,no items
to be considered under Parks and Recreation Department at this
time.
• D. Public Works Department -- There are no items to be
considered under Public Works Department at this time.
1-1 L
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting •
Page Two
There are seventeen (17) items on the agenda referred to as Consent
Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the
City Council desires to discuss any of the items in further
detail, those items should be removed from the consent agenda
and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required
is brief.
CONTRACTORS' LICENSE
A. Contractors' License -- The City has received contractor
license applications for contractors who do work in the City
of Eagan and seven -county metropolitan area. All of these contrac-
ors are considered reliable according to the Protective Inspections
Department. The necessary documents and fees have been submitted
and it is the recommendation of the Chief Building Inspector
that the contractors' licenses be approved. Enclosed on
pages Swc is a"copy of the list of proposed contractor license.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the contractor
license list as presented.
•
•
0
• MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE. PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
DATE: www ��` JUNE 1, 1984
RE: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE PER CITY CODE 6.42
The following lists of contractors have been doing work in the
City of Eagan, in the seven county metro area, and are considered
reliable. They have submitted the necessary documents and fees
and I would recommend that they be licensed to be a contractor
in the City of Eagan.
DP/nlb
•
J
3
FOR JUNE 5 1984 CITY COUNCIL MEETING:
GENERAL CONTRACTORS:
1. Al's Construction
2. Bjorklund Construction Co.
3. Colorcraft Corp.
4• Custom Energy Homes
5. Floodmaster Engineering Corporation
6. Kraus Anderson
7. Michael Construction, Inc.
8• Ordeen Splittstoser Cont., Inc.
9• Mike Rvgh Homes
10. Ken Smith'Remodeling
11, Stinar Corporation
12. Yankee Doodle Associates
HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR:
1. Mark Alberty
2. Linda 6 George Myhre
HEATING 6 VENTILATING CONTRACTORS:
1. Farmington plumbing d Heating
2. Churchill's Home Heating/Cooling. Inc.
SWIMMI� POOLS:
1. Fools, Inc.
.'l ry�i'i •I. I.Id �TC'�I �. �.
•
C�
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1989, City Council Meeting
• Page Three
PERSONNEL ITEMS
B. Personnel Items -- The following Personnel Items are to
be considered:
1) The City has retained Mr. Robert Wieken as a mechanical
inspector on a contractual basis to assist the Protective
Inspections Department with building inspections.
Unfortunately, Mr. Weiken, who is semiretired, is
undergoing surgery and is unable to perform inspection
services for the City. Due to the volume of inspections,
it was necessary to contact Mr. John Vujovich, who
was the chief building inspector in Inver Grove Heights
and is retired, to assist until Mr. Weiken returns
to the City as an inspector. Mr. Vujovich will be
hired as a consultant under the same arrangement as
Mr. Weiken and will work at the pleasure of the chief
building inspector. Mr. Vujovich did assist the City
of Eagan during the summer of 1983 and is very familiar
with the inspection schedules and the City.
•
•
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To retain Mr. John Vujovich
as a contractual building inspector to perform building inspection
services in the absence of Mr. Robert Weiken.
2) The City has approved a part-time clerk typist which
will be included in the clerical pool, bringing the
total manpower to 1.5 in the City Hall clerical pool.
The advertisements, interviews and selection process
has been completed and is the recommendation of the
Administrative Assistant, Holly Duffy, that Shelly
Lysne be hired as 'a part-time clerk typist to serve
the clerical pool under the supervision of the Department
of Administration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the temporary
services of Mr. John Vujovich and the hiring of a part-time
employee, Shelly Lysne.
S
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Four
-13, FINAL PAYMENT/PARK RIDGE ADDITION
C. Contract 83-13, Final Payment/Acceptance (Park Ridge Addition,
Et Al.) -- We have received a request for final payment from
our consulting engineering firm along with a Certification of
Compliance to previously approved plans and specifications for
the installation of trunk watermain within Covington Lane in
the Park Ridge Addition and a sanitary sewer lateral to service
the Robert B. Lewis House for Battered Women on Nicols Road.
Final inspections have been performed and verified by representa-
tives of the Public Works Maintenance Division with the end product
found to be acceptable for perpetual maintenance by the City.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third and
final payment of $4,108.58 to S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc., for
Contract 83-13 and accept for perpetual maintenance.
CONTRACT 83-5, FINAL PAYMENT/TREATMENT PLANT UTILITIES
D. Contract 83-5, Final Payment/Acceptance (Treatment Plant
Utilities) -- We have received a request for final payment from
our consulting engineering firm along with a certification of
compliance to previously approved plans and specifications for
the installation of transmission watermains from the existing
wells to the future treatment plant along with sanitary sewer,
storm sewer and first phase street improvements to service the
water treatment plant and adjacent benefited properties. Final
inspections and acceptance has been performed or reviewed by
Public Works Maintenance personnel and found to be in order for
consideration of acceptance for perpetual maintenance.
The final contract amount takes into consideration the approval
of Change Orders #1 and #2 listed as additional agenda items
under the Consent Agenda for the June 5 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the seventh
and final pay request for Contract 83-5 in the amount of $8,516.56
to Northdale Construction Company and accept the project for
perpetual maintenance.
r
•
•
FJ
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Five
It
CONTRACT 84-8/WILLIAMS PIPELINE ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
E. Contract 84-8, Approve Williams Pipeline Encroachment Agreement -
With the development of the Westbury and Lexington Square Additions,
several public improvements had to be initiated to provide the
proper utilities for these developments. These consisted of
Contracts 84-2 (Wescott Trunk Sanitary Sewer), Contract 84-8
(Westbury and Lexington Square Trunk and Lateral Utilities and
Streets) and Contract 84-9 (Lexington Avenue Trunk Watermain).
Each of these contracts required the construction of a utility
across the existing Williams Brothers Pipeline easement which
traverses across the McCarthy property, through the Westbury
Addition and proceeds easterly along the southside of Wescott
Road, crossing Lexington Avenue. Subsequently, because this
exclusive easement of Williams Pipeline requires written permission
from the company prior to any construction activity within that
easement, it is necessary for the City to enter into an "Easement
Encroachment Agreement" with the Williams Pipeline Company.
An agreement was prepared by Williams Brothers which authorizes
the property owner (Lexington South Incorporated), the developer
(Gabbert Development Inc.) and the City to perform grading and
utility/street construction work within their easement. Because
of the grade changes associated with the development, their standard
• policy would have required the pipelines to be relocated to the
proper elevation at an estimated cost of $55,000. In lieu of
this pipe relocation, they have agreed to accept the addition
fill beyond their standard limits in consideration for the City
accepting "all direct or indirect increased cost, including but
not limited to additional labor, materials, street and trailway
repairs, or other damages, arising out of the existance of said
improvements, and elevation and grade changes" required by the
City's and development's construction activities.
The Public Works Director cannot find evidence of a similar agree-
ment being entered into between the City and Williams Pipeline
for previous pipeline crossings. It appears that this will be
the first formal agreement and could be precedent setting for
future construction activities. However, it is necessary before
authorization can be granted to perform this work. All the above -
referenced contracts have already been let and the contractor
has proceeded with construction operations on other areas outside
these pipeline easements.
After review of the agreement by the Public Works Director and
City Attorney, it is recommended that the Council approve the
agreement and authorize its execution.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the easement
• encroachment agreement for Williams Pipeline Company and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
7
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Six
NATIONAL FLAG DAY
F. National Flag Day -- The City has received a sample Proclamation
from the National Flag Day Committee in Baltimore, Maryland,
asking that June 14 be recognized as National Flag Day. Enclosed
on pageCJ is a copy of a Proclamation for National Flag
Day, June 14, 1984.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To proclaim National
Flag Day, June 14, 1984.
Pi
C,
J
0
Flag Day Informatl*on
w0=91MMSESM1�1
.•.�:Mi,^:'i:'.'Ar�:'::.i•.it:�iMh'1t":'+',Ccti A.�•;t•
National Flag DayCommittee418 South Broadway
i.✓<.ear•+.YF:A!'!Is..CW`liWi.-•'IUY�KY/Wi'+::•
:•iYYW,+•.�K ill?JI'.?Y1L'i,-[:it{a!��'
Baltimore. Maryland 21231 Pause For The Pledge of Allegiance
SAMPLE PROCLAMATION
481A
NATIONAL FLAG DAY, JUNE 14, 1984
WHEREAS, by Act of the Congress of the United States, dated June 14, 1777,
the first official flag of the United States was adopted, and
WHEREAS, by Act of Congress, dated August 3, 1949, June 14 of each year was
designated "National Flag Day" and the Star-Spangled Banner Flag House
• Association in Baltimore, Maryland, has been the official sponsor since 1952
of National Flag Day for the United States, and
•
WHEREAS, on June 14, 1980, the Star-Spangled Banner Flag House Association
developed a national campaign to encourage all Americans to PAUSE FOR THE
PLEDGE of Allegiance as part of National Flag Day ceremonies, and
WHEREAS, since this concept caught the imagination of Americans everywhere
and has received wide citizen support and recognition, there has now been
created the National Flag Day Foundation, Inc. in Baltimore, Maryland to
plan the nations Flag Day ceremonies.
WHEREAS, Flag Day celebrates our nation's symbol of unity and stands for
our country's devotion to freedom to the rule of all and the equal rights
of all.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, (your name and title), do hereby proclaim June 14, 1984
as Flag Day in (your state), and urge all citizens of (your state) to pause
at 7:00 P. M. (EDT) on this date for the Fourth Annual PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE,
and recite with all Americans the Pledge of Allegiance to our Flag and
Nation.
9
A Prnpram of the Natinnal Flae Dav Foundation. Inc.. Baltimore. Maryland.
•
E
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
ADVISORY PARKS RESIGNATION/DOUGLAS MCNEELY
G. Resignation of Douglas McNeely/Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission Member -- Enclosed is a letter from Douglas McNeely,
copies on page // submitting his resignation as a member
of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. The City Adminis-
trator would like to discuss briefly a replacement for Mr. McNeely
at the time the Consent Agenda is handled or later in the meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation
letter of Douglas McNeely, a member of the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission.
/O
_cy 24, 1984
• The Honorable i-lyor end Ci*T, Council of Eagan
Nr. Yom Hedgcs, City Administrator -
12r. Iien Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation
h'--mbers of the Advisory narks and Recreation Commission
Dear I•'adams and Gentlemen:
Congratulations on the successful passing of the bond referendum. This will enhanco
the city of Eagan and bring us That much closer to the standards that were set in
the gaster Parks Pian.
I write you today to ask that you accent my i=mediate resignation from the Advisory
Parks and Rocreation Commission. Such thought h" gone into t --"-is decision. As you
1,sow, I began- a now occupation last November in bar',cing which rcouires travel time.
So far in 1984, I have missed over half of the meetings including sub-committoo and
special meetings. Even though the minutes arc prep_arcd in an. cxcellent m.^,rner, much
is missed in the form of discussion and debate. I have a1w, ys bccn c believor in
giving 1Q0" of your^elf to anything you ene::Rver. In thi: cno- I cC:_1'.ot. Y�4., afore,
1 -.Ch that Pau rGDl ^.Ce M3 with .n per Gon P^e c. ^n commit -,nd Cttcnd.
I Lar mnnv fond n3raorias pad hav-- m.a.dc _-,ny fino nccuni:aancies duri- thn pact
th_ec and one half years. In my opinion., i:o have the finost ;mayor, City Council,
Cit;=dmir-istrator, Director of Parks and Recreation, .,dvisory Parks and Recreation
Commission, Planning Commission and city staff^ny populus could hon-- for.
• If at nny time I ray be of service to the city of Eagan please don't hesitate to
give de a call.
Once again let me thank you for your patience and cooperation and keep up the good
work.
Sinceroly yours,
Douglas C. McNeely
P.S. Please advise me :;en if you want my copy of the Master Par'.cs Plan back.
0
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Eight
CONTRACT 83-5, CHANGE ORDER/WATER TREATMENT PLANT
H. Contract 83-5, Approve Change Order #1 (Water Treatment Plant -
Utilities and Streets), -- Change Order #1 provides for a change
in the scope of the contract to delete a portion of the storm
sewer laterals to service the future Water Treatment Plant parking
lot due to a conflict of scheduling activities between the treatment
plant general contractor and this utility contractor. Because
of the completion time frame for the City contract, it was not
possible for the storm sewer lateral to be constructed. However,
the contractor had purchased the materials which were delivered
to the site and subsequently secured and stored by City personnel.
Therefore, the original installation of this storm sewer lateral
is being deleted from the contract. However, the contractor
is being paid for the materials that have been delivered. Admin-
istratively the proper way to handle this transaction is through
a change order to the standard contract. Change Order #1 provides
for an addition to the standard contract amount of $1,465.76
for the materials only. The reduction in payment for the deletion
of the actual- installation will be accounted for in the final
close out of the contract by a reduction in final payment quantity.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order
• #1 to Contract 83-5 in the amount of $1,465.76 (ADD) and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
E
CONTRACT 83-5, CHANGE ORDER #2/WATER TREATMENT PLANT
I. Contract 83-5, Change Order #2 (Water Treatment Plant --
Streets and Utilities) -- During the jacking of the trunk watermain
underneath Yankee Doodle Road to connect the well sealed to the
Water Treatment Plant, the contractor encountered a Northwestern
Bell Telephone manhole vault. The location of this telephone
manhole had not been located by Northwestern Bell at either the
design or the construction phase of the work and subsequently
its existence was not known until the contractor hit it on his
jacking operations. Subsequently, the contractor was delayed
for eight working hours until Northwestern Bell could perform
the modifications to the manhole to allow us to proceed with
our construction phase. Subsequently, the City's contractor
has submitted a claim for $1,624 for down time delay and remobiliza-
tion costs which amount to $1,624.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #2
to Contract 83-5 in the amount of $1,624 (ADD) and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
/1,
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Nine
L I
ORDER PUBLIC HEARING/ST. FRANCIS WOODS 3RD ADDITION
J. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order
Public Hearing (St. Francis Woods 3rd Addition) -- We have received
a petition to vacate a portion of the drainage and utility easement
across Lots 1, 2, 5 and 6, of Block 2, St. Francis Wood 3rd Addition
as shown on the map enclosed on page // The vacation of
this drainage and utility easement is requested to allow a better
location of the townhouse units within these blocks due the con-
straints imposed upon these building sites by the existing ponding
area located at the rear of these lots.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition
and order the public hearing to vacate drainage and utility ease-
ments over Lots 1, 2, 5 and 6 of Block 2, St. Francis Woods 3rd
Addition to be held on , July , 1984.
CONTRACT 83-1, CHANGE ORDER #5/WATER TREATMENT PLANT
K. Contract 83-1, Change Order #5, Water Treatment Plant (Control
Valves) -- We have received a recommendation from our consulting
engineer to expand a portion of the Water Treatment Plant contract
to incorporate two changes as follows: •
Part A: This provides for a change in the control console
in the Water Treatment Plant to incorporate the Lexington
Avenue booster station controls which would constructed
during the fall of 1984 to be put on line during June of
1985. At the time of the design of the Water Treatment
Plant, it was not anticipated that this Lexington Avenue
booster station would be constructed at its present time
schedule. Because of its schedule, it is appropriate to
incorporate the telemetry equipment and control modules
into the overall control console of the Water Treatment
Plant.(ADD $14,080)
Part B: This provides for incorporation of future pump
control modules, digital displays and alarm controllers
within the Water Treatment Plant control console. To incorpor-
ate this work at this time will be substantially less expensive
than future field installations as additional wells are
added to the system every few years. (ADD $4,090)
This proposed change order has been reviewed with the Public
Works Director and the Utility Superintendent and found to be
timely and cost effective to be included under this contract.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #5 •
to Contract 83-1 in the amount of an additional $18,170 and author-
ize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
/A
k WET LAND
,v.w. c>awea of i
�NoarN L,rc or curuor 8
our�or a EASY SHORE Ii E—�
\ 1 59.00 X56 MEti� a \
G�`1N E c \ \
UJA iB-Z c�JRVEY \�
29
0b / 3e.� 3
CD i \
00 SSB 9,.m de of AC6rrEr YB L,NE
00..c °0 S
N CO IN 0 LOT + L0y !u O OY'Co 3 6s 96
\ lm uQ Zoll .130
0TR 9S`� 6s
0
N ♦ n r ry roP coT o°
a m P cP o ,? )
io D4 ss ^� �o 2 O.
q� co
oO,.
N Rr�ERay �/ Q nJ O Z 9 �1ss y° F �B \ F U
J D G E yNr a .�� "k-11 O°�
S ree �. w�ro T \aboo rl�
`�1/\f\r'I wwr�o oFJWvepry io2Oo oo••E c,"� / psi e7
k 4v
J
_ _ ti 3e oo 89 a, / oO� ho
A�Ir. r I r
LIi I I I.I�� 0 0 W� W 5 �e�oo 3z.0o r$ P� �—� oaA �nac a o / 6
Q ,� 0 n �1TILILY ESSLMCdi 6
0 a9 W O U (O !� l 38.00 •OO O s s
N N J� W m M o M O I ^ •� /� ?p �/
Q CI N pj
?
wcsrecLY zLo
W e v d T f m M
OurL T c— K Loy2 o
% O i 38, LOT m .p
)� o S 3 0
YI WEST LI�i4 �e`�o 00 E 3z.e0 �OT4 u k�~ .EI 00 fE
7^�-- it4?4 • �ra"l/°
S
5 o�> lb
10
78* 0p ju1144C
VA,
`
i.
Ile
oOUTLOT A
CN Gtr � -.. ♦ A. �. 'n.
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Ten
•
Is
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/CENTURY ADDITION
L. Final Plat Application, Century Addition -- We have received
an application for final plat approval for the Century Addition
located in the northwest corner of Coachman Road and Yankee Doodle
Road (County Road 28). Enclosed on page /6 is a copy of
the final plat for Council's reference. All conditions placed
on the preliminary plat approved by Council action on October
18, 1983, have been complied with as well as the final plat con-
figuration. In addition, all final plat application materials
have been submitted, reviewed and approved by staff and is being
forwarded to the Council for favorable consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
application for the Century Addition and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
1:!5
• I i _ p A :�� w ro a.ar «n ur rYI w lY _ i.r or In.. rr a.r. t..
80
L _ M.r...lp. t..r .1 ww.•yrr101. rN rY 4.. --
1
56�Y•51'00-E
ip cc;i'n
...,Abbirlu rr
_!:'% 1 u . ro-.
1, n.rn..r .Id ••••- u r
-. ul 1� d rr .e..� .1 t.w........ ...n .....
`i -.r H _ .'tlU 7 ij wN alar 4r r! nu.
•• _� wtw .r.. trlr MN urn ,_
I .r Mllir••e u r M W r min •surN a � In rl
Xlldr 1 In_'n ]0 ba �
1T. eortn it. or CA,a.N. Na, Isle
q
u.we te mw a b\rl
of 9outn 09 an... fl elms... 00 .r.M. [a.0.
n a✓«
NORTH o n.m.s t/! mcn by a inah floe NIN- MrIt 00tt 910urbW]-=Is--
I ..r
Pltl. e.N YG -N0 N6!, u=Is---U
• Wna
1 4ntl ,.n lrf llul i\li W.r�r..rr IIIN 1. M •Illu .1 �r ..mrr .•
Ittt. • '<IN \., rr w 41r .••.NN le 4.n
t`rot.. •rl{ t or aa9oi a.m..t•a to
DELMAR H. SCHWANZ "' PRELIMINARY COPY
SUBJECT TO REVISION .. •r' '"db�.'��11'I+�(•�>'4';.
LAND SURVEYORS INC. 4
U
LOCATION
MAF'
�.. .,... •e .+1 .N. r.nl \r w.I r. .I •,.•-•.n�,.......� ...
rr.l
p U. r.•nr .erim. r b. rr r rnYlo .uuN ul. r•r •1 —
SEC 9- IVIP27. Rd
23
I
run mu.a .r...r .vmanu
n• in
. 1 w
I le dmY •...wl
uI' I. i.IpNrr d gnld. 0. i1rMq r,tN rN do..n.
-
'
xl 1[M '
T
l
-
I
i.n
i1 v.
f
1 oYr . L rl•e,r
xe X4l Orr
�
I
-
1
L .Irr.. J• wf ..li [I:..Ire. wwY« lo.wwr... Ilhww 4r..1 ... M...,..
s
lu iw.rl pnpr .elr � i.r a IM.
it ilrYr i. il•m•.r. a 4w«I r•r, •. �
'
it %i ri ii^rvaila.Yu
rr rrl...wa _
M luaa4 Ina.ry o .enl.y.
1
41111
-E
I'-
li-
-S69.OB-
S99•51'00
tl
/
1 r[ rlr,l 411w1 YN el rl,e•,Mlir, • e•
w
v_ _w.ao
_ —
— _
— ——P��:
ep
:Le.TG..
r
_Iv —
_
r
/ .
Y�.r,
•L
s
rl
81 2
8
r
8
3
.m
•
8
§
.[9•]e
Cr,r rl:M Irntulw l..... , tr ar•rl. i elrMul,N
r
�T
o
n. e9.-
se]•v'ao[
9
n. x•f�n- Q
\r'
0-
q..
8
_
– _
8
l.aa
/
: 1 e..•p r rib nn 1 Y« ..-.rr .rNl.u...w nm•n wule.r \I. rlr�
p
p
p
Y1
/
' • 4-.wn n• Y wlr rl„ = w rra.r • e ,♦
alar• r Pellr e,.rrr• .-
2
_ _lel.:
_
_193. _ _
1,
a re,l. Irl, mi ,Y
I
w
ar«r•• • wne.„r..
1�'
IOa er wI•.r w. i. e.,u. n,.rr•,. rrr rn,.+ o.
hj
I
q
G
.
�
l
• I i _ p A :�� w ro a.ar «n ur rYI w lY _ i.r or In.. rr a.r. t..
80
L _ M.r...lp. t..r .1 ww.•yrr101. rN rY 4.. --
1
56�Y•51'00-E
ip cc;i'n
...,Abbirlu rr
_!:'% 1 u . ro-.
1, n.rn..r .Id ••••- u r
-. ul 1� d rr .e..� .1 t.w........ ...n .....
`i -.r H _ .'tlU 7 ij wN alar 4r r! nu.
•• _� wtw .r.. trlr MN urn ,_
I .r Mllir••e u r M W r min •surN a � In rl
Xlldr 1 In_'n ]0 ba �
1T. eortn it. or CA,a.N. Na, Isle
q
u.we te mw a b\rl
of 9outn 09 an... fl elms... 00 .r.M. [a.0.
n a✓«
NORTH o n.m.s t/! mcn by a inah floe NIN- MrIt 00tt 910urbW]-=Is--
I ..r
Pltl. e.N YG -N0 N6!, u=Is---U
• Wna
1 4ntl ,.n lrf llul i\li W.r�r..rr IIIN 1. M •Illu .1 �r ..mrr .•
Ittt. • '<IN \., rr w 41r .••.NN le 4.n
t`rot.. •rl{ t or aa9oi a.m..t•a to
DELMAR H. SCHWANZ "' PRELIMINARY COPY
SUBJECT TO REVISION .. •r' '"db�.'��11'I+�(•�>'4';.
LAND SURVEYORS INC. 4
U
•
•
Agenda Information
June 5, 1984, City
Page Eleven
Memo
Council Meeting
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/SUNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION
M. Final Plat Application, Suncliff 2nd Addition -- We have
received an application for final plat approval for the Suncliff
2nd Addition which is the second phase progression of this develop-
ment. Enclosed on page /to is a copy of the final plat for
Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary
plat approval approved by Council on October 18, 1983, have been
complied with in addition to this final plat conforming to the
concept of the originally approved preliminary plat layout.
In addition, all final plat application materials have been sub-
mitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable
consideration by the City Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
of the Suncliff 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
/7
1 i
1.
BLACKMAWN
6r S vim[
0rLOr
q
�N
S ! Y%Oe'E
A
ira: •3 r�•Irrlc S ws!`+j�e6
A y�..-CUFF�7�..-_ ROA[
'�M!�µu•'mY!YY. "b mR 4u1.•uu
i. q['ii/!!Gee }Lq}�b'��euC elx
6
vn
19ay
-q1 lx-
SUN CLIFF SECOND ADDITION
r'"r I�Y'•�w'v'fis
o+
♦ p
•� 3
n
I
e
n
e.Hvu'ig,F
F q
1
wmw w. r.m erlme. a vNih
Mry ! MI n .YP VN YP�e
;mnrl
6 e1 1•e. N IOIi ^n� N M
[f•uLx •I Irl OM YI Ir4
1M x•4n Yb J �b M 1/• N ��4.,
r •een, .um sn•...• mNena
Nnen n. Iun� n. emN. n
r,•,rn a e.P W
xer nbrc•
Der• Mn yearn 4, vf•q'
up•[ 9 L x IIN•
ww" WP
Nc. n. T 2 A 2
x�,•T O'�
S.uL�
e
Y_
.a
..gin l:r•
eMn /
SUN CLIFF SECOND ADDITION
r'"r I�Y'•�w'v'fis
o+
♦ p
•� 3
n
I
e
n
CR. WINDEN B ASSOCIATES INC
snKO $ VEYOese••-•
is 0 0
F q
1
=�
..gin l:r•
eMn /
ah7
'��.
I•-hnr
F
b
�
�:.'
m
nn•�
mhe
W
8�
iWr �Z•
Z
♦
�•me
�x••�
a
-'"gin
III
••/e
a�ip
�' e
.}' '',
�
u.ma
R_n�l
S
< III' !
1
■?
�q
•,r,nws
!
N/bxP9 nam
,•.
C�-
4 1
{{ S
e£
CR. WINDEN B ASSOCIATES INC
snKO $ VEYOese••-•
is 0 0
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Twelve
is
E
FINAL PLAT APPLICATION/HOLMES ADDITION
N. Final Plat Application, Holmes Addition -- We received an
application for final plat approval for the Holmes Addition located
at .the northeast corner of Quarry Lane and Towerview Road. A
copy of this final plat referencing these two residential lots
is enclosed on page 2,0 for the Council's review. All conditions
placed on the preliminary plat approval by Council action on
April 3, 1984, have been complied with. In addition, all final
plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff
and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council
action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
application for the Holmes Addition and authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute all related documents.
//
HOLMES ADDITION
P11
NOONEEaONG
CON PIIMY, INC.
SNCEI 1 OE 1 SIIEEIS
O.
,•
,I
'•
�1""
1
��
LC MAYO
LAKE
;n�/
_
BLOCC
K I0-0
� 1
r y..
s
P11
NOONEEaONG
CON PIIMY, INC.
SNCEI 1 OE 1 SIIEEIS
•
171
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Thirteen
GRADING PERMIT/LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH & LEXINGTON 2ND ADDITION
O. Grading Permit Application, Lexington Place South and Lexington
Place 2nd Addition -- we received an application for a grading
permit to perform the subdivision grading prior to final plat
process for Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place
South. The grading plan conforms to the preliminary plat approved
by Council on April 17, 1984. All permit application requirements
have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order
for favorable consideration by the City Council.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the grading
permit application for Lexington Place South and Lexington Place
2nd Addition.
a/
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
u
FINAL PLAT/SAFARI ADDITION
P. Final Plat Application, Safari Addition -- We have received
an application for final plat approval for the Safari Addition
located on the northwest corner of Safari Pass and Galaxie Avenue.
Enclosed on page 2-3 is a copy of the final plat for the
Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary
plat approved by Council action on March 22, 1984, have been
complied with. In addition, all final plat application materials
have been submitted and reviewed by staff and is being forwarded
to the Council with a recommendation of favorable consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final
plat application for the Safari Addition and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
•
•
0702
I
F%giIRIT "A'•
i THE SAFARI ADDITION
I` .. i`. J !1 I Ct C =
I i:•�Iis.mm-_ _ ___.^'• rO� •r^'m a •ae'ar r.�asnnm•.warn 509.50.22•Eaf31wG
�•pl___
� •.
n bb
.90
•r �040
4s1 1 T�• ..
-OUTLOT B ? It 1.T
W poop •f`�nrA�t'1• Ot�1y _
fie lq ` a V
rrpnp P lal•e m fll I�fl • In ,
a! • l 1 J• 1''
n +„a +• ��� 3 A • may. J `�_ � y1 � _
J. 'C7 N 'f. Q • ¢ ,e �,4 P.321 a6 •337 �' t1�: 5
_ o _ Mtgo 05
14
aSe �• y."2 '”; mai • i D• �1 p ,1 o,t.
r �
to .
J.
•• �' ",, // NORTH
�o�'f ►"a'e OUTLOT A.;A,
In
'potilt's i
q;
z •,• 3 0 i• •' ,a •. • n» ...I uM er aM nR er aM avvl 1.
6. b
2 $ `�•• = \ � •nu••a to Mo • eeerly er bran error•
bf ' er
81. i� ) e bran• IR Ien er n fnen Inn olo• •w•.a
•\ r1$ •.< •Itn oNLLlc uo orlpl "!II u•t1'. wlro
\\•� rl I �Oanlr•1•e •no-+.
•o
t •` r• pre
7
19♦ Ira mn aml •4114 •u•nenu •n •nn.n an•nr
LOCATION MAP
�;U l7. 7W 77-A 273
r
r
r7 a
DELMAR H. SCHWANZ
LAND SURVEYORS I INC.
I
r pp11
L
Mlna + !r•a In •lean• u+lu• •a+•r•br IMle. •M
••eaJr•e.fNa Y lel• IIMr. "n" 1Y faa In aan M djolnla
IIMM
11OIVaee M lM 01•l.
')R
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page fifteen
J
•
PROJECT 411/FEASIBILITY REPORT
Q. Project 411, Review Request/Authorize Feasibility Report
- Patrick Eagan Park (Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) -- With the
proposed development of the Birch Park Addition (formerly the
Windcrest Addition) and the Pilot Pointe Addition (located between
Skovdale No. 1 and 2) combined with the future storm sewer discharge
from the multiple residential and commercial development of
the Lexington South property at Lexington and County Road 30,
the outlet for Patrick Eagan Park into Hurley Lake will become
imminent within the next 1 - 2 years. Due to the fact that
this outlet will have to cross Pat McCarthy's property to discharge
into Hurley Lake, it is recommended that a feasibility report
be prepared to discuss the proposed improvements at a public
hearing to authorize the subsequent initiation of easement acquisi-
tion through condemnation.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Authorize the preparation
of a feasibility report for Project 411 (Patrick Eagan Park
- trunk storm sewer outlet).
1�
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Sixteen
PROJECT 404/UTILITIES
A. Project 404, Lexington Place South and 2nd Addition (Utilities)
-- In response to a petition received by the developer (U.S.
Homes/Orrin Thompson), the Council authorized the preparation
of a feasibility report for the installation of utilities to
service the Lexington Place 2nd Addition and the Lexington Place
South Addition located east of Lexington Avenue at Duckwood
Drive. The feasibility report was presented to the Council
on May 1 with the public hearing being scheduled for June 5.
Enclosed on pages .24 through �— is a copy of the feasibility
report for the Council's review during the public hearing.
A copy of this report has been provided to the developer for
his review prior to the public hearing. As of this date, the
staff has not received any comments or objections to this proposed
project. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper
and sent to all potentially affected property owners who would
be assessed with a portion of this project.
L
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing •
and approve/deny Project 404 for the installation of utilities
to service Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place
South.
-'7J
m
0
REPORT
ON
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH ADDITION
AND
LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
0 PROJECT. NO. 404
Qe"
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
FILE N0. 49306
/�oaedLroo, ilaseae, f4a�iilila a 4d"c&4eed, lac.
• � P� Mr.�.�mato
2335 V 9...A #Vk .p 36
cS'!. P..4 Af"...y 55113
PA... 612.636-4600
May 1, 1984
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Re: Lexington Place South S
Lexington Place 2nd Addition
Project 404
Our File No. 49306
Dear Mayor and Council:
0,0 G. Ronrsrroo. P.£.
Reba w. Ronny. P.E.
Jm hC. Ar Vhk. P.E.
81.Ww A. 4mDrr,, P.E.
Rmn.rd E. Turns, P.E.
damn C. M. , P.E.
GHnn R. Cwt, P.E.
KWh A.Gordon. P
lLoroal E voyn.
R.ha K Four,
Rolm G. P.E.
.Namur L. S k. AL
D.m C. RurrsNr. P.E.
/ar, A. Rourdm P. E.
lfml A. Herron. P.E.
TM K. F. d. P.E.
..q~ r. R.urmann, P.E.
Robe R. PTr//me PE.
1+. Lr .PF.
Cnerhr A. Elwk.
L. Af. P...blr
Ho &f M. OW,
Transmitted herewith is our report for Lexington Place South and Lexington
Place 2nd Addition, Project 404. This report covers sanitary, sever, water
main, and storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a •
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC.
-;;7;(7,,,Z
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this Report was
prepared by me or under my direct super-
vision and that I am aduly Registered
Professional Engineer under the laws of
the State of Minnesota. /
Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
Date: May 1„ 1984 Reg. No. 14260
Approved by,!. 'cal -LL) 41h, .
Thomas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
Date:—�—� 7 •
0601c
A7
•
•
•
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water
main, and storm sewer to service Lexington Place South and Lexington Place 2nd
Addition. Lexington Place South is located south of Duckwood Drive and east
of Lexington Avenue and includes 134 single family lots. Lexington Place 2nd
Addition is located north of Duckwood Drive and east of the first phase for
Lexington Place. Lexington Place 2nd Addition includes 6-16 unit, 1-12 unit,
and 1-8 unit condominium building. Also included is the construction of a
trunk water main along Lexington Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility Plan for the City of
Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract.
DISCUSSION:
SANITARY SEWER:
Lexington Place South - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes an 8 inch di-
ameter sanitary sewer constructed at a proper depth to service Lexington Place
South. The sanitary sewer will connect to a proposed 8" sanitary sewer to be
constructed as part of Lexington Square. The sanitary sewer will extend north
from Wescott Road as shown on the attached drawing. An easement will be re-
quired for construction of the sanitary sewer north from Wescott Road to the
south line of Lexington Place South. It is anticipated this easement will be
acquired by U.S. Home Corporation developers for Lexington Place South.
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes an 8
inch diameter sanitary sewer constructed in Blue Jay Way as shown on the at-
tached drawing. The sanitary sewer will connect to an existing manhole con-
structed as part of the first phase. The two 16 unit buildings located north
of Blue Jay Way will be served by the existing sanitary sewer constructed as
part of first phase for Lexington Place. The 16 unit building located north
0601c
Page 1.
Z�
of Duckwood Drive midway between Blue Jay Way will be served by an extension
of the proposed sanitary sewer from Lexington Place South.
WATER MAIN:
Lexington Place South - Water main proposed within Lexington Place South in-
cludes a 6 inch diameter water main as shown on the attached drawing. Also
included is the construction of an 18 inch diameter trunk water main along the
west side of Lexington Avenue from Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road. The trunk
water main will connect to an existing 18 inch water main at both Wescott Road
and Duckwood drive. The 6 inch water main in Lexington Place South will con-
nect to the 16 inch trunk water main in Duckwood Drive at three locations and
to the 18 inch trunk water main in Lexington Avenue at one location. Also in-
cluded is the required number of valves and hydrants. Lexington Place South
is located in the intermediate pressure zone with static pressures of 60 psi.
Ll
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Water main proposed within Lexington Place 2nd
Addition includes extending the 16 inch diameter trunk water main in Duckwood •
Drive to it's east line. Also included is extending a 6 inch diameter water
main south from Duckwood Drive along the easterly portion of Blue Jay Way
which will connect to the existing 6 inch water main in the northerly portion
of Blue Jay Way. The 6 inch diameter water main will be looped to service the
2-16 unit buildings located north of Blue Jay Way. Also included is the re-
quired number of valves and hydrants. Lexington Place 2nd Addition is located
in the intermediate pressure zone with static pressures of 60 psi.
SERVICES:
Lexington Place South - Internal lots within Lexington Place South will be
served by 4 inch diameter sanitary sewer and 1 inch diameter water. It is
proposed to construct the service line 15 feet beyond the property line. It
is also proposed to construct water services from the 18" trunk main in Lex- •
Page 2.
0601c
z9
• ington Avenue to the existing homes. For purposes of this report it is as-
sumed these services will be 1-1/2" diameter to provide the proper pressure.
Lexington place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed
to be constructed from the main line to within 15 feet of the building unit.
Sanitary sewer service are proposed to be 6 inch diameter and water service
are proposed to be 4 inch diameter.
STORM SEWER:
Lexington Place South - Storm sewer- proposed herein will convey storm water
runoff from Lexington Place South to an existing 24" CMP culvert beneath Lex-
ington Avenue as shown on the attached drawing. From this point storm water
will be conveyed .naturally through an open channel to Hurly Lake (Pond
JP -11). The outlet for this pond is presently being constructed as part of
• Project No. 382.
Storm water within Lexington Place South will be contained within three
storm water ponds which are discussed as follows:
Storage
NWL
HWL
Ac -Ft.
Outflow
Pond JP -45A 899.7
900.7
1.74
0.5 cfs
Pond JP -45 894.0
897.3
3.14
1.0 cfs
Pond JP -45B 893 895.5 3.19 1.0 cfs
As indicated in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan, Pond JP -46 located di-
rectly east of Lexington Place South in Carriage Hills Golf course was in-
tended to outlet to Pond JP -45. Reviewing in detail the present characteris-
tics of Pond JP -46, it is recommended it's outlet -be directed to the southeast
to Pond JP -42 thus confining the drainage within Carriage Hills Golf Course to
• it's own boundaries along with Lexington Place South. Storm sewer pipe pro -
Page 3.
0601c
,30
posed herein include a combination of 24", 18", 15" and 12" diameter storm •
sewer pipe.
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Storm sewer proposed within Lexington Place 2nd
Addition includes extending an 18" diameter storm sewer pipe southerly in Blue
Jay Way as shown on the attached drawing. Also included is construction of a
manhole in conjunction with two catch basins and 15" storm sewer pipe within
the cul-de-sac located northerly of Blue Jay Way. The manhole will be con-
structed over the, existing 12" storm sewer constructed as part of the first
phase. It should also be noted that with the increase in development for this
drainage area, Pond DP -10 is presently experiencing a flooding condition and
that it's outlet to Pond DP -5 and then to Pond DP -4 should be considered
shortly.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA •
NW 1/4, SECTION 14
Lexington Place First Addition, Lot 1, Block 3 (Future Lexington Place 2nd
Addition)
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
Williams and Larue Addition
Block 1; Lots 1-4
Parcel 011-52 (Future Lexington Place South)
Parcel 030-53
Parcel 041-53
Parcel 043-53
Parcel 044-53
SE 1/4, SECTION 15
St. Francis Wood Addition - Outlot A •
Parcel 012-76
0601c Page 4.
3/
COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located
• at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows:
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
Sanitary Sewer $ 295,020
Water Main
Lexington Avenue Trunk Water Main 177,330
Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main 149,010
Services
Lexington Avenue Services 11,290
Lexington Place South Services 107,180
Storm Sewer 168,940
Page 5.
0601c
3-7-1
LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION
Sanitary Sewer
S 25,820
•
Water Main
81,190
Services
36,410
Storm Sewer
22,280
TOTAL ............................
$1,074,470
The total estimated project cost is
$1,074,470 which includes contingen-
cies and all related overhead. Overhead
costs are estimated
at 27% and in-
clude legal, engineering, administration,
and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to
belevied against the
benefited prop-
erty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of
this report in
Appendix B.
SANITARY SEWER:
Lexington Place South - Sanitary sewer
proposed herein is
lateral and is
therefore proposed to be assessed entirely
to the benefited
property. The
•
sanitary sewer from Wescott Road north to
the south line Lexington Place South
Page 5.
0601c
3-7-1
is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis at the lateral benefit from
trunk rate in effect at the time.of the public hearing. A corner lot credit •
of 150' in conjunction with assuming only the developable front footage would
be assessed was the basis for determining the assessable footage. All remain-
ing costs were divided equally amongst the benefited lots in Lexington Place
South including 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. Trunk area assessments
for this area are pending as part of Project No. 361 Wescott Trunk Sanitary
Sewer.
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Sanitary sewer proposed herein is to be as-
sessed equally amongst the benefited units in Lexington Place 2nd Addition.
Trunk area sanitary sewer for this area was previously assessed as part of
Project No. 58.
WATER MAIN:
Lexington Place South - Trunk water main within Lexington Avenue is proposed
to be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate in effect at the time of •
the public hearing based on the present zoning use. It is proposed to.assess
only 50% of the front footage along Lexington Avenue to those parcels which
will receive benefit for looping purposes. However, it is proposed that the
trunk water main in Duckvood Drive be assessed at the lateral benefit from
trunk rate based on the entire front footage 'abutting Lexington Place South.
It is also proposed to assess those areas which have not been previously as-
sessed for trunk area water main if they receive direct benefit. Lateral
water main within Lexington Place South will be assessed completely to the
benefited lots in addition to assuming 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53.
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Trunk water main within Duckvood Drive is pro-
posed to be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate in effect at the
time of the public hearing for the entire front footage abutting Lexington •
0601c
Page 6.
35
• Place 2nd Addition. Lateral water main within Lexington Place 2nd Addition
will be assessed equally amongst the benefited units. Trunk area water main
for this area was previously assessed as part of Project No. 58.
SERVICES:
Lexington Place South - Services proposed within Lexington Place South will be
assessed equally amongst the benefited lots including 7 lot equivalents for
Parcel 044-53. It is proposed that the cost for the water main services along
Lexington Avenue be assessed equally to the benefited lots.
Lexington Place 2nd Addition - Services proposed within Lexington Place 2nd
Addition will be assessed equally amongst the benefited units.
STORM SEWER:
Lexington Place. South - Storm sever within Lexington Place South is considered
lateral storm sewer and is therefore proposed to be assessed equally amongst
• the benefited lots including 7 lot equivalents for Parcel 044-53. Because the
storm sever witnin Lexington Place South conveys drainage only within it's
boundaries and is not designed to extend beyond it's boundaries, no areas out-
side of Lexington Place South excepting the 7 lot equivalents for Parcel
044-53 are proposed to be assessed for lateral storm sever. Trunk area storm
sever is proposed to be assessed to the area shown on the attached drawing
based on the rates in effect at the time of the public hearing.
TRUNK RATES: Trunk area and lateral benefit from trunk rates in effect at the
time of this report are as follows:
TRUNK AREA
Trunk Water Main Oversize
Agricultural
Residential Platted Lot
• Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize
Single Family
0601c
Page 7.
$1,120/Acre
$535/lot
$0.045/a.f.
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK
Lateral Benefit Sanitary Sever $13.10/F.F.
Lateral Benefit Water Main
Single Family $10.84/F.F.
Multiple $17.87/F.F.
REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as
follows:
Sanitary Sewer
Lateral
Lateral Benefit
Lateral Assessment
Water. Main
Trunk
Lateral
Trunk Area
Lateral Benefit from Trunk
Lateral Assessment
Services
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
0601c
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
Project Cost Revenue Balance
$295,020
$ 6,550
288,470
$295,020 $295,020 - 0 -
$177,330
149,010
$ 52,204
46,785
149,010
$326,340 $247,999 -$ 78,341
$119,100
$119,100
$119,100 $119,100 - 0 -
Page 8.
3$
0
•
•
Storm Sever
• Lateral $168,940
Lateral Assessment $168,940
Trunk Area Assessment 87,667
$168,940 $256,607 +$ 87,667
TOTAL............................................... +S 9,326
LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION
Project Cost Revenue Balance
Sanitary Sever
Lateral $ 25,820
Lateral Assessment $ 25,820
$ 25,820 $ 25,820 - 0 -
Water Main
•
Trunk
$
34,740
Lateral
46,450
Lateral Benefit from Trunk
$
13,796
Lateral Assessment
46,450
$
81,190
$
60,246
-$ 20,944
Services
Lateral
$
36,410
Lateral Assessment
$
36,410
$
36,410
$
36,410
- 0 -
Storm Sever
Lateral
$
22,280
Lateral Assessment
$
22,280
$
22,280
$
22,280
- 0 -
•
TOTAL ...............................................
-$ 20,944
Page 9.
0601c
36
The total estimated trunk fund balance for Lexington Place South and Lex-
ington Place 2nd Addition is -$11,618 (-$20,944 + $9,326 = -$11,618).
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plane and Specifications
Open Bids
Award Contract
Construction Completion
Final Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Taxes
0601c
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Page 10.
37
0
May 1, 1984
June 5,1984
June 5, 1984
June 29, 1984
July 3, 1984
Fall, 1984
Spring, 1985
Spring, 1986
0
11
• APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
PROJECT NO. 404
A. SANITARY SEWER
6,710
Lin.ft.
8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 0'-20' dp. in pl. @ $15.00/l.f.
$100,650
750
Lin.ft.
8" PVC Sanitary Sewer, 20'-40' dp. in pl. @ $50.00/l.f.
37,500
38
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
34,200
230
Lin.ft.
MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/each
16,100
10
Lin.ft.
8" Outside drop @ $120.00/lin.ft.
1,200
300
Lin.ft.
4" CISP Service riser in pl. @ $18.00/lin.ft.
5,400
141
Each
8" x 4" wye in pl. @ $50.00/each
7,050
1
Each
Connect MH to existing 8" PVC @ $200.00/each
200
300
Cu.yds.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
3,000
LUMP
SUM
Clear b grub tree @ $1,000.00/L.S.
1,000
7,460
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
11,190
• 2.5
Acre
Seed w/fertilizer b mulch @ 51,500.00/acre
3,750
Total
$221,240
+5% Contingencies
11,060
$232,300
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
62,720
TOTAL.................................................
$295,020
- J
0601c
Page 11.
B. WATER MAIN
a) Lexington Avenue Trunk Water Main (Duckwood Drive to Wescott Road)
2,680 Lin.ft. 18" DIP Water main in pl. @ $37.00/lin.ft.
60 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $15.00/lin.ft.
60 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 6" DIP v/carrier pipe @ $100.00/lin.ft.
2 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,200.00/each
1
Each
18" Butterfly valve and box @
$2,400.00/each
3
Each
6" Resilient wedge gate valve
6 box @ $450.00/each
7,000
Lbs.
Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb.
2
Each
Connect 18" DIP to existing 18"
DIP @ $500.00/each
100
Cu.yds.
Rock stabilization below pipe
@ $10.00/cu.yd.
2.0
Acres
Seed with fertilizer 6 mulch @
$1,500.00/acre
320
Ton
Class 2 shouldering material @
$8.00/ton
2,740
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @
$1.50/lin.ft.
Total
+5Z Contingencies
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
TOTAL................................................
b) Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main
6,370 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft.
12 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each
11 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $450.00/each
6,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb.
100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
6,370 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/Lb.
Total
+5% Contingencies
0601c
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
TOTAL...............................................
Page 12.
34
40
$ 99,160
900
6,000
2,400
2,400
1,350
9,100
1,000
1,000
3,000
2,560
4,110
$132,980
6,650
$139,630
37,700 •
$177,330 .
$ 76,440
12,000
4,950
7,800
1,000
9.555
$111,745
5,585
$117,330
31,680
$149,010
•
•
C. SERVICES
a) Lexington Avenue Services
320
Lin.ft.
Jack or auger 114" Type "K" copper in pl. @ $24.00/l.f.
$
7,680
6
Each
114" Corporation atop in pl. @ $50.00/each
300
6
Each
114" Curb stop 6 box in pl. @ $80.00/each
480
Total
$
8,460
+5Z Contingencies
430
$
8,890
+27Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest
2,400
TOTAL...............................................
$
11,290
b) Lexington Place South Services
5,640
Lin.ft.
4" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $5.00/lin.ft.
$
28,200
5,640
Lin.ft.
1" Type "K" copper in pl. @ $5.00/lin.ft.
28,200
141
Each
1" Corporation atop in pl. @ $30.00/each
4,230
141
Each
1" Curb stop 6 box in pl. @ $80.00/each
11,280
5,640
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
8,460
Total
$
80,370
•
+5Z Contingencies
4,020
$
84,390
+27Z Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bund Interest
22,790
L
0601c
TOTAL ................................................ $107,180
Page 13.
Z
D. STORM SEWER
240 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $34.00/lir,.ft.
860 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft.
640 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft.
1,850 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft.
8 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
6 Each Std. 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
8 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each
1 Each 24" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $1,200.00/each
3 -Each 18" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $900.00/each
1 Each 15" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each
4 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash`guard @ S700.00/each
LUMP SUM Clear 6 grub trees @ $1,000.00/L.S.
30 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd.
I
100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pii pe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
3,590 Lin.ft. .Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
2.0 Acres Seed w/fertilizer b mulch @ $1,500.00/acre
Total
+5X Contingencies
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin'-& Bond Interest
TOTAL ................... ..........................
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
SUPDIARY
A. SANITARY SEWER
B. WATER MAIN
a) Lexington Avenue TrunklWater Main
b) Lexington Place South Lateral Water Main
C. SERVICE
a) Lexington Avenue Services
I
b) Lexington Place South Services
D. STORM SEWER
TOTAL LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH ............
i
Page 14.
0601c
I
5 8,160 •
24,080,
15,360
40,700
7,200
5,400
6,400
1,200
2,700
800
2,800
1,000
1,500
1,000
5,385
3,000
$126,685
6,335 •
$133,020
35,920
$168,940
$295,020
177,330
149.010
11,290
107,180
168,940
$908,770
•
• LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION
PROJECT NO. 404
A. SANITARY SEWER
730
Lin.ft.
8" PVC Sanitary sever in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft.
$
10,220
6
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH v/cstg. @ $900.00/each
Lin.ft.
5,400
12
Lin.ft.
MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/lin.ft.
Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each
840
8
Each
8"x6" wye in pl. @ $50.00/each
2,000
400
1
Each
Connect 8" PVC to ex. MH @ $400.00/each
6,000
400
100
Cu.yd.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
Each
1,000
730
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $300.00/each
1,095
100
Cu.yd.
Total
$
19,355
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
+52 Contingencies
975
Total
$ 60,875
$
20,330
3,055
+272 Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
5,490
TOTAL............................................... $ 25,820
B. WATER MAIN
• 780
Lin.ft.
16" DIP Water main in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft.
$ 21,840
1,590
Lin.ft.
6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft.
19,080
4
Each
Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each
4,000
1
Each
16" Butterfly valve b box @ $2,000.00/each
2,000
2
Each
6" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $450.00/each
900
6,000
Lbs.
Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb.
7,800
1
Each
Connect 16" DIP to existing 16" DIP @ $400.00/each
400
1
Each
Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $300.00/each
300
100
Cu.yd.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
1,000
2,370
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft.
3,555
Total
$ 60,875
+52 Contingencies
3,055
$ 63,930
+272 Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest
17,260
•
TOTAL ................................................ $ 81,190
Page 15.
0601c
C. SERVICES
1,360 Lin.ft
7 Each
1,360 Lin.ft
8 Each
1,360 Lin.ft
D. STORM SEWER
250 Lin.ft.
70 Lin.ft.
._ 4 Each
4 Each
1 Each
50 Cu.yds.
280 Lin.ft.
0601c
0
6" PVC Sanitary sever service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 8,160
6" PVC Clean-out @ $100.00/each 700
4" DIP Water main service @ $10.00/lin.ft. 13,600
4" Resilient wedge gate valve b box @ $350.00/each 2,800
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 2,040
Total $ 27,300
+5X Contingencies 1,370
$ 28,670
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 7,740
TOTAL................................................. $ 36,410
18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 7,000
15" RCP Storm sever in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 1,680
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 3,600
Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 3,200
Connect 18" RCP to existing 18" RCP @ $300.00/each 300 •
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 500
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.50/lin.ft. 420
Total $ 16,700
+5% Contingencies 840
$ 17,540
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 4,740
TOTAL................................................ $ 22,280
LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION
SUMMARY
A. SANITARY SEWER $ 25,820
B. WATER MAIN 81,190
C. SERVICE 36,410
D. STORM SEWER 22,280
TOTAL LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDN. ...... $165,700
Page 16.
a
•
• APPENDIX,B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL .
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
PROJECT NO. 404
A. SANITARY SEWER
a) Lateral Benefit from Sever
Assessable
Total
Parcel
Description
Front Footage
Rate/FF
Assessment
Parcel
030-53
250
$13.10
$3,275
Parcel
041-53
250
$13.10
3,275
$6,550
Total
Parcel
Description
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington
Place South
• Block
1, Lots 1-8
8
$2,045
$ 16,367
Block
2, Lots 1-29
29
$2,045
59,331
Block
3, Lots 1-9
9
$2,045
18,412
Block
4, Lots 1-10
10
$2,045
20,458
Block
5, Lots 1-10
10
$2,045
20,458
Outlot
D
(8 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
16,367
Outlot
E
(10 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
20,458
Outlot
F
(13 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
26,597
Outlot
G
(18 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
36,826
Outlot
H
(11 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
22,508
Outlot
I
(8 Lot
Equivalent)
$2,045
16,367
SW 1/4
SECTION 14
Parcel
044-53
(7 Lot Equivalent
$2,045
14,321
TOTAL .............
141
$288,470
•
Page 17.
0601c
B. WATER MAIN
a) Lateral
Parcel Description
Lexington Place South
Block 1, Lots 1-8
Block 2, Lots 1-29
Block 3, Lots 1-9
Block 4, Lots 1-10
Block 5, Lots 1-10
Outlot D
Outlot E
Outlot F
Outlot G
Outlot H
Outlot I
SW 1/4 SECTION 14
Parcel 044-53
TOTAL .............
b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk
•
(7 Lot Equivalent) $1,057, 7,398 •
141 $149,010
Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot
Lexington Place South (1384.23 F.F. x $10.84/FF - $15,005)
Block
1,
Lots
1-8
Total
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
8
2,
Lots
$1,057
$ 8,454
29
$112
$1,057
30,647
9
1-9
9
$1,057
9,511
10
Block
4,
$1,057
10,568
10
$1,057
10,568
(8
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
8,454
(10
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
10,568
(13
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
13,739
(18
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
19,023
(11
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
11,625
( 8
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,057
8,454
(7 Lot Equivalent) $1,057, 7,398 •
141 $149,010
Parcel Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot
Lexington Place South (1384.23 F.F. x $10.84/FF - $15,005)
Block
1,
Lots
1-8
8
$112
Block
2,
Lots
1-29
29
$112
Block
3,
Lots
1-9
9
$112
Block
4,
Lots
1-10
10
$112
Block
5,
Lots
1-10
10
$112
Outlot
D
(8
Lot
Equivalent)
$112
Outlot
E
(10
Lot
Equivalent)
$112
Outlot
F
(13
Lot
Equivalent)
$112
Outlot
G
(18
Lot
Equivalent)
$112
Outlot
H
(11
Lot
Equivalent)
$112
Outlot
I
( 8
Lot
Equivalent)
$112.
134
Page 18.
0601c
Total
Assessment
$ 896
3,247
1,008
1,120
1,120
896
1,120
1,456
2,016
1,232
896 •
$ 15,005
• b) Lateral'Benefit from Trunk
(Cont'd.
Lot
1 -- -- 1
lot
Assessable
$
Total
Parcel Description
Front Footage
Rate/FF
Assessment
William and Larue Addition
$535/Lot
$
535
Block 1, Lot 1
179
$10.84(2)
$ 1,940.36
Block 1, Lot 2
135
$10.84
1,463.40
Block 1, Lot 3
156
$10.84
1,691.04
Block 1, Lot 4
140
$10.84
1,517.60
St. Francis Wood - Outlot A
641.42(1)
$17.87(3)
11,462.18
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
Parcel 043-53
417.36
$10.84
$ 4,524.18
Parcel 044-53
242.64
$10.84
2,630.22
SE 1/4, SECTION 15
Parcel 012-76
604.36(1)
$10.84
6.551.26
11
11
(1) Represents 502 of total front footage abutting Lexington Avenue.
(2) Single Family Rate
(3) Multiple Rate
c. Trunk Area
Area Credit
Parcel Description (acre) (acre)
Lexington Place South 50 Street -9.4
(Parcel 011-52) Pond -3.9
William 6 Larue Addition
$31,780.24
Assessable
Area Total
(acre) Rate Assessment
36.7 $1,120/Ac. $41,104
Block
1,
Lot
1 -- -- 1
lot
$535/lot
$
535
Block
1,
Lot
2 -- -- 1
lot
$535/Lot
$
535
Block
1,
Lot
3 -- -- 1
lot
$535/lot
$
535
Block
1,
Lot
4 -- -- 1
lot
$535/lot
$
535
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
Parcel 043-53 3.18 Street -0.64 2.54 $1,120/ac. $ 2,845
Parcel 044-53 6.82 Street -1.36 5.46 $1,120/ac. 6,115
TOTAL ......................... $52,204
0601c
Page 19.
c. Trunk Area (Cont'd.)
Total
•
Parcel Description
No. of Lots Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington Place South
Block 1, Lots 1-8
8
$301
$ 2,454
Block 2, Lots 1-29
29
$307
8,896
Block 3, Lots 1-9
9
$307
2,761
Block 4, Lots 1-10
10
$307
3,067
Block 5, Lots 1-10
10
$307
3,067
Outlot D
(8 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
2,454
Outlot E
(10 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
3,067
Outlot F
(13 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
3,988
Outlot G
(18 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
5,522
Outlot H
(11 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
3,374
Outlot I
( 8 Lot
Equivalent)
$307
2,454
134
$ 41,104
C. SERVICES
a) Lexington Avenue Services
Total
Parcel Description
No. of Services Cost/Service
Assessment •
William and Larue Addition
Block 1, Lot 1
1
$1,882
$ 1,882
Block 1, Lot 2
1
$1,882
1,882
Block 1, Lot 3
1
$1,882
1,882
Block 1, Lot 4
1
$1,882
1,882
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
Parcel 043-53
1
$1,882
$ 1,882
Parcel 044-53
1
$1,882
1,882
TOTAL
......................
$11,290
0601c
Page 20.
j47
•
•
b) Lexington Place South
Total
Parcel Description
No.
of
Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington Place South
Block 1, Lots
1-8
8
$760
$ 6,081
Block 2, Lots
1-29
29
$760
22,044
Block 3, Lots
1-9
9
$760
6,841
Black 4, Lots
1-10
10
$760
7,601
Block 5, Lots
1-10
10
$760
7,601
Outlot D
(8
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
6,081
Outlot E
(10
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
7,601
Outlot F
(13
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
9,882
Outlot C
(18
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
13,683
Outlot H
(11
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
8,362
Outlot I
( 8
Lot
Equivalent)
$760
6,082
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
Parcel 044-53
(7
Lot
Equivalent
$760
$ 5,321
TOTAL ...........
141
$107,180
•
D. STORM SEWER
a) Lateral
Total
Parcel Description
No.
of
Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington Place South
Block 1, Lots
1-8
a
$1,198
$ 9,585
Block 2, Lots
1-29
29
$1,198
34,747
Block 3, Lots
1-9
9
$1,198
10,783
Block 4, Lots
1-10
10
$1,198
11,982
Block 5, Lots
1-10
10
$1,198
11,982
Outlot D
(8
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
9,585
Outlot E
(10
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
11,982
Outlot F
(13
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
15,576
Outlot C
(18
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
21,567
Outlot H
(11
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
13,180
Outlot I
( 8
Lot
Equivalent)
$1,198
9,585
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
•
Parcel 044-53
(7
lot
equivalents)
$1,198
$ 8,387
TOTAL ..........
141
$168,940
Page 21.
0601c
b) Trunk Area
0601c
Page 22.
a
11
Assessable
Area
Credit Area
Total
Parcel
Description
(s.f.)
(s.f.) (s.f.)
Rate
Assessment
Lexington Place South
2,178,000
Str.
410,770 1,599,530
$0.045/s.f.
$71,979
Pond
167,700
SW 1/4,
SECTION 14
Parcel
043-53
138,690
Str.
27,740 110,950
$0.045
$ 4,993
Parcel
044-53
297,080
Str.
59,420 237,660
$0.045
10,695
TOTAL ........................................
$87,667
Total
Parcel
Description
No. of Lots Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington
Place South
Block
1, Lots
1-8
8
$537
$ 4,298
Block
2, Lots
1-29
29
$537
15,578
Block
3, Lots
1-9
9
$537
4,834
Block
4, Lots
1-10
10
$537
5,371
Block
5, Lots
1-10
10
$537
5,371
Outlot
D
(8
Lot Equivalent)
$537
4,297
Outlot
E
(10
Lot Equivalent)
$537
5,372
Outlot
F_
(13
Lot Equivalent)
$537
6,983
Outlot
C
(18
Lot Equivalent)
$537
9,669
Outlot
H-
(11
Lot Equivalent)
$537
5,909
Outlot
I
(8
Lot Equivalent)
$537
4,297
134
$ 71,979
0601c
Page 22.
a
11
is
0601c
Page 23.
50
LEXINGTON PLACE 2ND ADDITION.
PROJECT NO: 404
A. SANITARY SEWER
Total
Parcel
Description
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington
Place 2nd
Addition
Block
1, Lot 1
16
$223
$ 3,561
Block
1, Lot 2
12
$223
2,671
Block
1, Lot 3
16
$223
3,561
Block
2, Lot 1
16
$223
3,562
Block
2, Lot 2
16
$223
3,562
Block
2, Lot 3
8
$223
1,781
Block
2, Lot 4
16
$223
3,561
Block
2, Lot 5
16
$223
3,561
TOTAL .......... 116
$25,820
•
B. WATER MAIN
a) Lateral
Total
Parcel
Description
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Assessment
Lexington
Place 2nd
Addition
Block
1, Lot 1
16
$400
$ 6,407
Block
1, Lot 2
12
$400
4,805
Block
1, Lot 3
16
$400
6,407
Block
2, Lot 1
16
$400
6,407
Block
2, Lot 2
16
$400
6,407
Block
2, Lot 3
8
$400
3,203
Block
2, Lot 4
16
$400
6,407
Block
2, Lot 5
16
$400
6,407
TOTAL
.............. 116
$46,450
is
0601c
Page 23.
50
n
(1� Multiple Rate
C. SERVICE
b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk
Total •
Parcel
Description
Total
Parcel
Description
No. of Units
Cost/Unit
Assessment
Lexington
Place 2nd Addition (772
F.F. x $17.87/F.F.
(1) _ $13,796)
1, Lot
Block
1, Lot 1
16
$119
$ 1,903
Block
1, Lot 2
12
$119
1,427
Block
1, Lot 3
16
$119
1,903
Block
2, Lot 1
16
$119
1,903
Block
2, Lot 2
16
$119
1,903
Block
2, Lot 3
8
$119
951
Block
2, Lot 4
16
$119
1,903
Block
2, Lot 5
16
$119
1,903
Block
TOTAL ..............
116
16
$13,796
(1� Multiple Rate
C. SERVICE
Total •
Parcel
Description
No.
of Units
Cost/Unit
Assessment
Lexington
Place 2nd Addition
Block
1, Lot
1
16
$314
$ 5,022
Block
1, Lot
2
12
$314
3,767
Block
1, Lot
3
16
$314
5,022
Block
2, Lot
1
16
$314
5,022
Block
2, Lot
2
16
$314
5,022
Block
2, Lot
3
8
$314
2,511
Block
2, Lot
4
16
$314
5,022
Block
2, Lot
5
16
$314
5,022
TOTAL ..............
116
$36,410
0601c
Page 24.
.5 1
•
• D. STORM SEWER
•
•
0601c
Page 25.
S.L
Total
Parcel
Description No.
of Units
Cost/Unit
Assessment
Lexington
Place 2nd Addition
Block
1,
Lot 1
16
$192
$ 3,073
Block
1,
Lot 2
12
$192
2,305
Block
1,
Lot 3
16
$192
3,073
Block
2,
Lot 1
16
$192
3,073
Block
2,
Lot 2
16
$192
3,073
Block
2,
Lot 3
8
$192
1,537
Block
2,
Lot 4
16
$192
3,073
Block
2,
Lot 5
16
$192
3,073
TOTAL ..............
116
$22,280
•
•
0601c
Page 25.
S.L
SUMMARY
PROJECT NO. 404
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ROLL
COST/LOT, UNIT,
PARCEL
Water Main
Storm
Sewer
Sanitary
Lateral
Trunk
Services
Sewer
Benefit
Total
Parcel
Description
Lateral
Lateral
From Trunk
Area
Lateral
Lateral
Trunk
Assessment
Lexington
Place South
Block
1,
Lots
1-8
$ 2,045
$1,057
$ 112
$ 307
$ 760
$1,198
$ 537
$ 6,016.00
Block
2,
Lots
1-29
$ 2,045
1,057
$ 112
307
760
1,198
'537
6,016.00
Block
3,
Lots
1-9
$ 2,045
1,057
$ 112
307
760
1,198
537
6,016.00
Block
4,
Lots
1-10
$ 2,045
1,057
$ 112
307
760
1,198
537
6,016.00
Block
5,
Lots
1-10
$ 2,045
1,057
$ 112
307
760
1,198
537
6,016.00
Outlot
D
$16,367
8,454
$ 896
2,454
6,081
9,585
4,297
48,134.00
Outlot
E
$20,458
10,568
$1,120
3,067
7,601
11,982
5,372
60,168.00
Outlot
F
$26,597
13,739
$1,456
3,988
9,882
15,576
6,983
78,221.00
Outlot
C
$36,826
19,023
$2,016
5,521
13,683
21,567
9,669
108,305.00
Outlot
H
$22,508
11,625
$1,232
3,374
8,362
13,180
5,909
66,190.00
Outlot
I
$16,367
8,454
$ 896
2,454
6,082
9,585
4,297
48,135.00
Lexington
Place 2nd
Addition
Block
1,
Lot 1
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
1,
Lot 2
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
1,
Lot 3
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ .192
--
$ 1,248
Block
2,
Lot 1
_$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
2,
Lot 2
$ 223
$ 400
$' 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
2,
Lot 3
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
2,
Lot 4
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
Block
2,
Lot 5
$ 223
$ 400
$ 119
--
$ 314
$ 192
--
$ 1,248
sic
41ge
•
26.
0
(Continued)
William and Larue Addition
Block 1, Lot 1 --
Block 1, Lot 2 --
Block 1,,Lot 3 --
Block 1, Lot 4 --
St. Francis Wood
OUTLOT A --
SW 1/4, SECTION 14
SUMMARY
PROJECT NO. 404
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
COST/LOT, UNIT, PARCEL
-- $1,940.36
$
535
$1,882 --
-- $
4,357.36
-- $1,463.40
$
535
$1,882 --
-- $
3,880.40
-- $1,691.04
$
535
$1,882 --
-- $
7,988.44
-- $1,517.60
$
535
$1,882 --
-- $
3,934.60
$11,462.18 -- -- -- -- $11,462.18
Parcel 030-53 $ 3,275 $:3,275.00
Parcel 041-53 $ 3,275 $ 3,275.00
Parcel 043-53 $ 4,524.18 $2,845 $1,882 $ 4,993 $14,244.18
Parcel 044-53 $14,321 $7,398 $ 2,630.22 $6,115 $7,203 $8,387 $10,695$56,749.22
SE 1/4, SECTION 15
Parcel 012-76
0601c
$ 6,551.26 --
Page 27.
-- -- -- $ 6,551.26
W
�
�
O
O
O
Q
O
t—
Y1
2! 4
5 4 7 9
910`
I
O
U
0•
\
Ua TL1P
Olf'rL,„C � %
N
O50 -Ss W
O
I
3
2 1
3
z
1
\ \
S
29
2 7O
\ WTLOT A
5
28
3
I S
9
7
27
3
!/
O;L LdT 1 I
I I I 1 1
I IG' I
041-53
2e
, O
70
25
9
z4
7
B
9
10
z3
9
1
II
22
9
'
_L_L _L_L_l-i_,
19
IS 12
0
10
B.T
—=
7 LOT EOUIV4 LENT
030-55
PROPOSED
20
19
_
—
044- 33
LEXINGTON SQUARE'
Is
19 n 18
I
2
OVTLOT C
1-0.
'O
WILLIAMS LARUE ADD.
3
F �—
O —
043.53
1 1 2 3 4
9
9 1 6
5
LEXINGTON
AVE.
(CO. RD. NO. 43 )
ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD.
012.79
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM SEWER
RATE/F. F.
if CORNER LOT CREDIT 150 FT
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
SANITARY SEWER
-qrll�
F
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK
d ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul. Minn.
Date: MAY, 1984 PRO♦J. NO.
COMM. 49306 404
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
EAGAN, MINNESOTA St. Paul, Minn.
WATER MAIN Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO.
_[COMM. 49306 404
.-<4
W
p
O
O
O
O
cr
Y I 3 4 3 6 7 6 a O
O
v
7
h�T Ei
�O L
�
0fflZ
oso•ss
N
O
dT/
1 s z 1 1
i %
;
\\
3 ' 29 E
i
OUTLOT
4 5 26
y/}u7T
5 6 27 4 T, 0�
7 6
Ool-SS
25 i
6
I G I I
6 25 6 �O
r a 24 r
6 . 10 25 6
II Y
I
I
1413 12 21 10=
7LOT EQUIVALENT
030-53
'
I
20
044-33
_
IS IB 17 IB IY I
OUTLOT C ~
J F
WILLIAMS
6 LARUE
DO.
I
3 3
O
.013-53 1
2 3
4
•
i
s e7e s ® 0 6.r
1B"
--
mlivLawlamm
I
LEXINGTON AVE. (C0. R0. NO.43 )
ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD.
012 •76
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT
RESIDENTIAL RATE
®®® COMMERCIAL HIGH DENSITY RATE
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
EAGAN, MINNESOTA St. Paul, Minn.
WATER MAIN Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO.
_[COMM. 49306 404
.-<4
W
LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO. 43 )
ST. FRANCIS W000 ADD.
TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
WATER MAIN
TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT
!; 7
012-76
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
0
SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers •
St. Paul, Minn.
Date: MAY. 19841r PROJ. NO.
COMM. 49306 1 404
n
L
"Im
oQ
Dan.If��
3
• 1 4
J 9 e T e a
9
101
1a�o
POND
JP -050.
OOTTLOT A
i L 90
i
d 1
7LOT EOUIVAL ENT
= 044-53
O 0_
—2- 0 043.53
4
5
O,
T L S
a 1f
\110/
7
I
OUTLOT C
1r LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO.43 )
ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD.
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGANF MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER
0
0
050-53 vvi
W
3
041-53
030-53
ILLI MS a LARUE DO
1 x 1 s 4
012-76
I\ .
ERISTINO OPEN BWALE
POND JP -11
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
d ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minn.
Date: MAY, 19Ra pROJ. NO.
Comm. a9ao5 404
O`
O
Q
OI
O
Y
u
r�
I
Ll
LEXINGTON AVE. (CO.
ST. FRANCIS WOOD ADD.
® AREA ASSESSMENT
,*40.43)
LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER AREA ASSESSMENT
rr9
012 -7e
NORTH
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
Pi
11
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLM
III, ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting E"Ineers •
St. Paul. Minn.
Oats: MAY. 1984 PROJ. NO.
COMM. 49306 1 404
0
•
ASSESSMENT AREA
NORTH
o. zqo
SCALE IN IN FEET
LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION
LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION
• UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
SANITARY SEWER
66
BLUE JAY WAY
LEXINGTON AVEACO.RO.NO.
w
E
0
0
0
0
3
Y
U
7
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minn.
Data: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO.
Comm, 49306 Ir 404
J
LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION
BLUE JAY WAY
ASSESSMENT AREA
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT
® COMMERCIAL HIGH DENSITY RATE
NORTH
LEXINGTON AVE. (C0. RD. NO.43 )
0 200
1 SCALE IN FEET
LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
WATER MAIN
41
•
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
& ASSOCIATES, INC. •
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minn.
Date: MAY, 1984 PROJ. NO.
Comm. 49305 dnd
`v � 'i tlNlts
::t IS ttW�f?
� S i In
t�uNKs .t n�
ASSESSMENT AREA
NORTH
0 !00
SCALE IN FEET
I
LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION
BLUE JAY WAY
LEXINGTON AVE. (CO. RD. NO.43 )
LEXINGTON PLACE 2nd ADDITION
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER
G L
I
C
9
SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
i ASSOCIATES, INC.
ComWting EngMeere
St. Paul. Minn.
Data: MAY. 198 PROD. NO.
Comm. 49306 1i 404
i
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Seventeen
•
•
PROJECT 400/LIFT STATION/FORCE MAIN OUTLET
B. Project 400, Oak Cliff Pond (Lift Station and Force Main
Outlet -- In response to a petition received from the developer
of the Oak Cliff Addition, the Council authorized the preparation
of a feasibility report to install the lift station and force
main outlet for the pond located in the center of this subdivision.
On May 1, the completed feasiblity report was presented to the
Council for their review and scheduling of the public hearing
to be held on June 5. Enclosed on pages _ (�_ through
i/ is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's
review during this public hearing. A copy of the feasibility
report has been sent to the developer for his review. In addition,
notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all potentially affected property owners. As of this date,
the staff has not received any objections or comments pertaining
to this proposed project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 400 for the installation of a storm
sewer lift station and force main outlet to the Oak Cliff pond.
G3
0
0
REPORT
ON
OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10)
TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET
PROJECT NO. 400
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
FILE N0. 49303
/�o.redt:oa, Rodme, 4m&*" a 44j"ia", Inc.
61,
i
36
SL. P..c M....r. 33113
P".- 612-636-4600
May 3, 1984
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Re: Oak Cliff Pond (AP -10)
Trunk Storm Sever Outlet
Project 400
Our File No. 49303
Dear Mayor and Council:
0tc.
Glenn R. Cook, P.E.
A'mh A. Gmd.n
Themm E'. Nor
Rchort w.'R
Repro G. &1h ... M. P.E.
M.n. L. So b. P.E.
Lo..ld C. &Wry 1. P.E.
fmy A. Bourton, P E.
Mark A. H... P.E.
rm K. FWU. P.E.
.MRbrl T. Fnlm.nn, P.E.
Raba R. Pl�pmr. P.F.
D..d L. A... P. E.
Ch.d. A. Emkm.
L. M. P.w .
H.Mn .V. Own
Transmitted herewith is our report for Oak Cliff Pond Outlet, Project 400.
This report covers trunk storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment
roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a •
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC.
_�Ira4z a --Z', I I -,I �
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this Report was
prepared by me or under my direct super-
vision and that I am a duly Registered
Professional Engineer under 'the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
YGit
Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
i
Date: May 3, 1984 Reg. No. 14260
Approved by:
Thomas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works •
Date:
6Jr
G. P.E.
o
01
Rn 1..
R W.
Rohn W. Ron M, P.E.
A.dr, k, P.E.
B. fd d A. 4mbn, P. E.
Rmb E. r.mr. P.E.
loon C. Ghon. P.E.
Glenn R. Cook, P.E.
A'mh A. Gmd.n
Themm E'. Nor
Rchort w.'R
Repro G. &1h ... M. P.E.
M.n. L. So b. P.E.
Lo..ld C. &Wry 1. P.E.
fmy A. Bourton, P E.
Mark A. H... P.E.
rm K. FWU. P.E.
.MRbrl T. Fnlm.nn, P.E.
Raba R. Pl�pmr. P.F.
D..d L. A... P. E.
Ch.d. A. Emkm.
L. M. P.w .
H.Mn .V. Own
Transmitted herewith is our report for Oak Cliff Pond Outlet, Project 400.
This report covers trunk storm sewer and includes a preliminary assessment
roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a •
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC.
_�Ira4z a --Z', I I -,I �
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this Report was
prepared by me or under my direct super-
vision and that I am a duly Registered
Professional Engineer under 'the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
YGit
Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
i
Date: May 3, 1984 Reg. No. 14260
Approved by:
Thomas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works •
Date:
6Jr
• SCOPE: This project includes the construction of trunk storm sewer which will
provide an outlet for Oak Cliff Pond. Oak Cliff Pond is designated as Pond
AP -10 in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. Oak Cliff
Pond is located west of Slaters Road and south of Cliff Road (Co. Rd. No. 32).
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Storm Sewer Plan for the City
of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one con-
tract.
DISCUSSION: Trunk storm sewer proposed herein includes providing an outlet
for Oak Cliff Pond (AP -10). Trunk storm sewer includes a submersible lift
station located -on the south side of Oak Cliff Pond as shown on the attached
drawing. The lift station will include two 115 gallon per minute pumps at 5.0
• horsepower each. Also included is a 4" diameter force main which will convey
storm water from Pond AP -10 to Pond AP -10A. A 12" diameter gravity storm
•
sewer will convey storm water from Pond AP -LOA to an existing 24" diameter
storm sewer in Slaters Road at James Street. Pond AP -10B located directly
west of Slaters Road at James Street will discharge directly into the 12" di-
ameter gravity storm sewer from Pond AP-IOA. Access to the lift station will
be provided by constructing a 12' wide gravel drive from Slaters Road across
Outlet C. It is assumed for purposes of this report that Slaters Road will be
open cut for storm sewer construction.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
Assessment Area
Oak Cliff Addition
Outlot B, C, D, E, F
Page. 1.
0661c
64
0
COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located
at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $98,080 which
includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated
at 27.5% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Storm sewer included herein is trunk. Trunk area assessments
for storm sewer have been previously assessed under Project No. 186 for this
area. However, the assessment amount was determined at the agriculture
(single—family) rate. Since that time the zoning classifications for certain
outlots within Oak Cliff Addition have been defined under the Winkler/Jackson
Planned Unit Development Agreement. It is therefore proposed to assess those
Outlots at the 1984 rate for their present zoning less the 1984 rate for the
zoning at which they were previously assessed (agricultural). Trunk rates in
effect at the time of this report are as follows: •
Single Family $0.045/sq.ft.
Multiple Rate $0.057/sq.ft.
Commercial $0.068/sq.ft.
REVENUE: Revenue to cover the cost of this project is as follows:
Project Cost Revenue Balance
STORM SEWER
Trunk $98,080
Trunk Area Assessment $27,963
$98,080 $27,963 —$70,117
The estimated trunk fund balance is —$70,117. It is assumed this amount
will be the responsibility of the trunk storm sewer fund.
•
Page 2.
0661c
47
0
•
•
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report May 1, 1984
Public Hearing June 5, 1984
Approve Plans and Specifications June 5, 1984
Open Bids June 29, 1984
Award Contract July 3, 1984
Construction Completion Fall, 1984
Final Assessment Hearing Spring, 1985
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Spring, 1986
0661c
Page 3.
No'
APPENDIX A •
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10)
TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET
PROJECT NO. 400
500
Lin.ft.
12" RCP Storm sever in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft.
$ 13,000
2
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH v/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each
2,000
LUMP
SUM
Lift Station No. 1 @ $37,100.00/L.S.
37,100
10
Lin.ft.
MH depth greater than '8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
6,000
450
Lin.ft.
4" DIP Force main @ $10.00/lin.ft.
4,500 '
LUMP
SUM
Gravel access drive @ $3,500.00/L.S.
3,500
150
Sq.yds.
Bituminous mixture for patch @ $20.00/sq.yd.
3,000
30
Lin.ft.
Concrete curb b gutter @ $15.00/lin.ft.
450 •
2.0
Acres
Seed v/mulch b fertilizer @ $2,000.00/acre
4,000
-
Total
$73,550
+52 Contingencies
3,680
$77,230
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest
20,850
TOTAL .............................................
$98,080
1
Page 4.
0661c
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
OAK CLIFF POND (AP -10)
TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET
PROJECT NO. 400
•
0661c
0
Page 5.
76
Assessable
Parcel
Present
Area
Credit
Area
Total
Description Zoning
(sq.ft.)
(sq.ft.)
(sq.ft.)
Rate/sq.ft.
Assessment
OAK CLIFF
ADDITION
Outlot B.
Multiple
549,600
Pond
224,000
260,480
$0.012
$ 3,125
Str.
65,120
OutIot C
Multiple
387,200
Pond
59,200
262,400
0.012
3,149
Str.
65,600
• Outlot D
Commercial
345,600
Str.
69,120
276,480
0.023
6,359
Outlot E
-Commercial
394,800
Str.
78,960
315,840
0.023
7,264
Outlot F
Commercial
438,400
Str.
87,680
350,720
0.023
8,066
TOTAL ..............................
$27,963
•
0661c
0
Page 5.
76
C. S. A. H. NO. 32
4a1�
\�S
RAVEL ACCESS ROAD
OAK CLIFF POND
AP -'10 '
N.W.L. 919.7
H.W.L. 924.0
LIFT STATION
4" FORCEMAIN
POND AP-IOA
N.W.L. 946.0
i
H.W.L. 946.7
m'
0.5 AC. FT.
I
POND AP -108
N.W.L. 945.0
JAMES ST.
H.W.L. 948.5
\2
2.0 AC. FT.
0 400
SCALE IN FEET
TRUNK AREA ASSESSMENT
® COMMERCIAL RATE
® MULTIPLE RATE
OAK CLIFF POND ( AP -10 )
TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET
SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
Q ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers •
St. Paul. Minn.
EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: MAY, 1984 F'KUJ. 1
11 Comm.49303 11 400
yellL
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Eighteen
PROJECT 398/STREETS 8 UTILITIES
C. Project 398, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Streets B Utilities)
-- On May 15, the City Council opened a public hearing to discuss
the feasibility of installing streets and utilities to service
the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition under Project 398. During that public
hearing, the developer requested that the scope of the project
be reduced from what was originally requested and anticipated
due to current market conditions. Subsequently, the City Council
continued the public hearing until June 5 and ordered the feasibil-
ity report to be revised to incorporate the scope of the project
intended to be developed under the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
Therefore, enclosed on pages _73 through _0 is a copy
of the "revised" feasibility report for Project 398 relating
to the final plat configuration previously discussed by the
City Council under the final plat application of the Consent
Agenda for the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Because this is a continua-
tion of the public hearing held on May 15 and the revised report
did not incorporate any additional properties that were not
previously included in the original report, no additional notifica-
tions were published in the legal newspaper. However, a copy
• of the revised feasibility report has been provided to the developer
for his information prior to the public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 398 for the installation of streets
and utilities for the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
•
_7z
0
REPORT
Con
SUN CLIFF 2nd ADDITION
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO.398 REVISED
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
FILE N0.49300
BmeA&042, /tOdelie, lgmd," ii 9 rgddociated, Jnc.
e :,q'e
73
Baxe�ww ��ww.�.ww u�_''I` �//����� �/�
&iewe, y'7 yQ,pC{�,(,�',Y
,B�('.
Gh R. COW. P.E.
£nlh A. Car P.E.
Y
ala G. Bonru.Oo, P.E.
.
IA0.6 NO.a. P.G
R'. R.. P.E.
R'M M'. Fawn. P.E.
Ja h C. AM1111A. P.E.
RO G. &h.wh'. P.E.
2335 W/. 7WA WVA..? 36
B.. Pm A. P.E.
M.rv,. L. SO A.. P.E.
Sl. P..r All. .-,- 55.fm
ft&M E. Turns. P.E.
D ..&C. B.,V d,. P.E.
J.m C. OLo.. P.L.
Jfny A. Bo.NO., P.L.
PA... 612.636-4600
Mm* A. H.., P.E.
TN K. F . P.E
M~ F. P.E.
RO R. fy Jfj e. P.F
Oa.E LaY O... P.E.
April 16, 1984
Ch A. Enrlan
lAa M. Po.H,IY
' Habn M. Olm.
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Mo. 55121
Re: Sun Cliff 2nd Addition
Utility b Street Improvements
Project No. 398 - Revised
File No. 49300
Dear Mayor and Council:
Transmitted herewith is our report for Sun
Cliff 2nd Addition
Utility and
Street Improvements, Project 398. This report covers
utility and
street im-
provements to service Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
•
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other
interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect
of this
report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROA, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the tate of Minnesota.
Mark A. Hanson
Date: April 16, 1984 Reg. No. 14260
Approved by
Phoma.9AC-olbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works •
Date: .j � y Y
0368c /
• SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water
main, storm sewer and streets to service the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition. Sun
Cliff 2nd Addition is located south of Co. Rd. 30, between Beaver Dam Road and
Blackhawk Road and includes 81 single family lots.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plan for
the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out in
one contract.
DISCUSSION:
Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes 8 inch diameter lat-
eral sanitary sewers to properly service the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
Sun Cliff 2nd Addition will be served by laterals constructed within the pro-
posed streets at a proper depth to service the abutting lots. All sewers in
• this project will connect to sewers in the Sun Cliff 1st Addition.
Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes 6 inch diameter laterals and
a 16 inch trunk water main to properly service the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addi-
•
tion. A 16 inch diameter trunk water main was constructed under Project 317
in the west boulevard of Blackhawk Road from Co. Rd. 30 to a point 1,850 feet
south of Co. Rd. 30. This trunk main would be extended to the south limits of
Sun Cliff 2nd Addition as a part of this project. Lateral water mains pro-
posed herein will connect to water mains in Sun Cliff lot Addition as well as
the previously mentioned trunk water main on Blackhawk Road. Also included
are the required number of valves and hydrants.
Services - Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed to be constructed 15
feet beyond the property line. Service lines are proposed to be 4 inch diame-
ter for sanitary sewer and 1 inch diameter for water.
Page 1.
0368c
%S
Storm Sewer - The storm sewer holding pond' designated as Pond AP -7 is located •
at the northeast corner of future Suri Cliff Additions. It is proposed to ex-
tend an 18 inch diameter storm sewer from the Sun Cliff 1st Addition through
the 2nd Addition. This storm sewer will serve portions of the 2ndAddition
and will be extended to provide an outlet to Pond AP -7 when future Sun Cliff
Additions are developed. Also included is a lateral storm sewer which will
convey drainage from Fox Ridge Court to Pond AP -23. The outlet for Pond AP -23
will be constructed by Mn/DOT as part of I -35E to an existing storm sewer in
Rahn Road.
Street - Street construction proposed herein includes construction of a 32
foot wide street constructed to a 7 ton residential design thickness'with sur-
mountable concrete 'curb and gutter in conjunction with the required restora-
tion for boulevards. It is assumed that grading of the streets will be done
by the developer prior to the start of this project. •
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA
N 1/2 SECTION 29
Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Parcel 014-28)
Sun Cliff 2nd Addition (Parcel 012-09)
COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located
at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows:
Sanitary Sever $ 85,860
Water Main 120,270
Services 68,850
Storm Sever 41,310
Street 177,390
TOTAL ............. $493,680 •
Page 2.
0368c
76
The total estimated project cost is $493,680 which includes contingencies
• and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 27% and include
legal, engineering, administration and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re-
port in Appendix B. Trunk area sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer
have been previously assessed to this area as a part of Project 236.
SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the cost of the new lateral sanitary
severs for this project equally to all the lots in the Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
WATER MAIN: Water main proposed herein is separated into trunk and lateral
water main. It is proposed to assess a lateral benefit from trunk for half
the length of the 16 inch trunk water main along Blackhawk Road. The remain-
ing costs associated with the 16 inch trunk main will be the responsibility of
• the trunk fund. It is proposed to assess the cost of the lateral water main
and the lateral benefit from the trunk main equally to all the lots in Sun
•
Cliff 2nd Addition.
SERVICES: It is proposed that all services be 4 inch sever and 1 inch water
services and that they extend 15 feet into the property. It is proposed to
assess the total cost of the services equally to all the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd
Addition.
STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the cost of the new lateral storm sewer
equally to all the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
STREET: Street construction proposed herein is to be assessed equally to all
the lots in Sun Cliff 2nd Addition.
All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. Trunk rates in
effect at the time of this report are as follows:
0368c
Page 3.
77
LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK
Lateral benefit from a trunk water main ......... $21.68 centerline ft.
REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as
follows:
A.) SANITARY SEWER
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
8.) WATER MAIN.
Lateral
Trunk
Lateral Assessment
Lateral Benefit from Trunk
C.) SERVICES
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
D.) STORM SEWER
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
Project
Cost
$ 85,860
$ 85,860
$ 82,698
37,572
$ 68,850
$ 68,850
$ 41,310
Page 4.
0368c
79
Revenue Balance
$ 85,860
$ 85,860 - 0 -
$ 82,698
4,762
$ 87,460 -$32,810
$ 68,850
$ 68,850
$ 41,310
$ 41,310
- 0 -
0
•
•
E.) STREET
• Lateral
Lateral Assessment
•
•
$177,390
$177,390
$177,390 $177,390 - 0 -
TOTAL ................ -$32,810
The total estimated trunk fund balance for this project is -$32,810 which
will be the responsibility of the trunk water fund.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report June 5, 1984
Public Hearing. . June 5, 1984
Approve Plans and Specifications June 5, 1984
Open Bids July 2, 198,+
Award Contract July 3, 1984
Construction Completion Fall, 1984
Final Assessment Hearing Winter, 1985
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1986
0368c
Page 5.
79
B.) WATER MAIN
900
Lin.ft.
APPENDIX A
$ 23,400
3,800
•
6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $11.00/lin.ft.
41,800
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
Each
Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each
6,300
1
Each
SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION
1,800
10
Each
Resilient wedge gate valve b box in pl, @ $350.00/ea,
3,500
PROJECT NO. 398
Lbs.
Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb.
5,200
A.) SANITARY SEWER
Each
Connect to Ex. 16" DIP @ $400.00/each
400
3,000
Lin.ft.
8" PVC Sanitary sewer, 10'-15' dp, in pl, @ $13.00/l.f.
$
39,000
Cu.yds.
14
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
Lin.ft.
12,600
4,700
50
Lin.ft.
MH depth greater than 8' dp, in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
$ 90,190
3,000
4
Lin.ft.
Outside drop for MH in pl. @ S150.00/lin.ft.
600
$ 94,700
30
Lin.ft.
4" CISP Service riser in pl. @ $10.00/lin.ft.
25,570 •
300
84
Each
8"x4" wye in pl. @ $40.00/each
3,360
222.5
Cu.yds.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
2,225
3,000
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
3,000
1
Each
Connect to existing MH @ $300.00/each
300
Total
$
64,385
+5X Contingencies
3,220
$
67,605
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest
18,255
•
A.) TOTAL SANITARY SEWER .............................
$
85,860
B.) WATER MAIN
900
Lin.ft.
16" DIP Water main in pl. @ $26.00/lin,ft.
$ 23,400
3,800
Lin.ft.
6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $11.00/lin.ft.
41,800
7
Each
Hydrant in pl. @ $900.00/each
6,300
1
Each
16" Butterfly valve 6 box in pl, @ $1,800.00/each
1,800
10
Each
Resilient wedge gate valve b box in pl, @ $350.00/ea,
3,500
4,000
Lbs.
Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb.
5,200
1
Each
Connect to Ex. 16" DIP @ $400.00/each
400
2
Each
Connect to Ex. 6" DIP @ $300.00/each
600
249
Cu.yds.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
2,490
4,700
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
4,700
Total
$ 90,190
+52 Contingencies
4,510
$ 94,700
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest
25,570 •
B.) TOTAL WATER MAIN ................................
$120,270
Page 6.
0368c
• 5.) SERVICES
3,600 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer service in pl. @ $6.00/lin.ft.
3,600 Lin.ft. 1" Type "K" copper water service in pl. @ $5.10/L.f.
82 Each 1" Corporation stop in pl. @ $20.00/each
82 Each 1" Curb atop b box in pl. @ $70.00/each
4,290 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
Total
+5% Contingencies
•
•
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
C.) TOTAL SERVICES .................................
D.) STORM SEWER
650 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-15' dp. in pl. @ $26.00/1.£.
260 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp, in pl. @ $19.00/lin.ft.
3 Each Std. 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. in pl. @ $950.00/each
2 Each CB w/cstg. in pl. @ $800.00/each
20 Lin.ft. MH Depth greater than 8' dp. in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
1 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard in pl. @ $540.00/ea. .
4 Cu.yds. Rip rap in pl. @ $50.00/cu.yd.
84 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
910 .Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
1 Acres Seed with mulch in pl. @ $1,000.00/Ac.
0368c
Total
+5% Contingencies
$ 21,600
18,360
1,640
5,740
4.290
$ 51,630
2,580
$ 54,210
14.640
$ 68,850
$ 16,900
4,940
2,850
1,600
1,200
540
200
840
910
1,000
S 30,980
1,550
$ 32,530
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 8,780
D.) TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................ $ 41,310
Page 7.
I
E.) STREET
TOTAL
•
1,200
Cu.yda.
Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd.
$ 3,600
600
Cu.yds.
Select Granular borrow @ $4.50/cu.yd.
2,700
13,960
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation @ $0.25/sq.yd.
3,490
4,600
Tons
Cl. 5 100% crushed quarry rock in pl. @ $7.00/ton
32,200
1,150
Tons
2331 Bituminous base course in pl. @ $11.00/ton
12,650
1,150
Tons
2341 Bituminous wear course in pl. @ $12.00/ton
13,800
130
Tons
Bituminous material for mixture in pl. @ $200.00/ton
26,000
600
Gals.
Bituminous material for tack coat in pl. @ $1.20/gal.
720
6,900
Lin.ft.
Surmoutable concrete curb and gutter in pl. @ $4.50/l.f. 31,050
1,860
Lin.ft.
Reinforcing for concrete C. b G. in pl. @ $1.00/l.f.
1,860
18
Each
Adjust MH or CB frame @ $120:00/each
2,160
8
Each
Adjust GV box @ $100.00/each
800
2
Acres
Seed w/mulch in pl. @ $1,000.00/Ac.
2,000
Total
$133,030
+5% Contingencies
6,650
$139,680
+27% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest
37,710 •
E.) TOTAL STREET ................................... ..$177,390
0368c
A.
TOTAL
SANITARY SEWER
$ 85,860
B.
TOTAL
WATER MAIN
I
120,270
C.
TOTAL
SERVICES .
68,850
D.
TOTAL
STORM SEWER
41;310
E.
TOTAL
STREET
177,390
TOTAL ...................
$493,680
Page 8.
�'v2'
•
APPENDIX B
• PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
SUN CLIFF 2ND ADDITION
PROJECT NO. 398
A. SANITARY•SEWER
u
Page 9.
0368c
�3
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
N 1/2, SECTION
29
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
23
$1,060
$ 24,380
Block 2, Lots
1-12
12
'$1,060
12,720
Block 3, Lots
1-19
19
$1,060
20,140
Block 4, Lots
1 6 2
2
$1,060
2,120
Block 5, Lot 1
1
$1,060
1,060
Block 6, Lots
1-24
24
$1,060
25,440
TOTAL
81
$ 85,860
B. WATER MAIN
•
No, of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
1) LATERALS
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
23
$1,021
$ 23,482
Block 2, Lots
1-12
12
$1,021
12,252
Block 3, Lots
1-19
19
$1,021
19,398
Block 4, Lots
1 & 2
2
$1,021
2,042
Block 5, Lot 1
1
$1,021
1,021
Block 6, Lots
1-24
24
$1,021
24,503
TOTAL
148
(1) $ 82,698
u
Page 9.
0368c
�3
2) LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK (439.33' @ $10.84/FF - $4,762)
C. SERVICES
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
SUN CLIFF
2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
Block
1,
Lots
1-23
23
$59
'$1,352
Block
2,
Lots
1-12
12
$59
706
Block
3,
Lots
1-19
19
$59
1,117
Block
4,
Lots
1 6 2
2
$59
118
Block
5,
Lots
1
1
$59
59
Block
6,
Lots
1-24
24
$59
1,410
81
$4,762
C. SERVICES
Page 10.
0368c /
�f
E
•
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
23
$850
$
19,550
Block 2, Lots
1-12
12
$850
10,200
Block 3, Lots
1-19
19
$850
16,150
Block 4, Lots
1 & 2
2
$850
1,700
Block 5, Lots
1
1
$850
850
Block 6, Lots
1-24
24
$850
20,400
TOTAL
148
.$
68,850
D. STORM SEWER
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
23
$510
$
11,730
Block 2, Lots
1-12
12
$510
6,120
Block 3, Lots
1-19
19
$510
9,690
Block 4, Lots
1 6 2
2
$510
1,020
Block 5, Lots
1
1
$510
510
Block 6, Lots
1-24
24
$510
12,240
TOTAL
81
$
41,310
Page 10.
0368c /
�f
E
•
•
E. STREET
No. of Lots
Cost/Lot
Total Cost
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block 1, Lots
1-23
23
$2,190
$ 50,370
Block 2, Lots
1-12
12
$2,190
26,280
Block 3, Lots
1-19
19
$2,190
41,610
Block 4, Lots
1 6 2
2
$2,190
4,380
Block 5, Lots
1
1
$2,190
2,190
Block 6, Lots
1-24
24
$2,190
52,560
TOTAL
81
$177,390
•
0368c
Page 11.
P5
PROJECT 398 - REVISED
SUMMARY
COST/LOT
0368c
Page 12.
0
•
Sanitary
Lateral Ben-
Storm,
Legal
Sever
Water
efit from
Sever
Total
Description
Lateral
Lateral
Water Main
Services
Lateral
Street
Cost/Lot
SUN CLIFF 2ND
ADDITION
Block
1,
Lots
1-23
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,690
Block
2,
Lots
1-12
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,690
Block
3,
Lots
1-19
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,690
Block
4,
Lots
1 & 2
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,690
Block
5,
Lots
1
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,690
Block
6,
Lots
1-24
$1,060
$1,021
$59
$850
$510
$2,190
$5,60
0368c
Page 12.
0
•
C,
SUN C1 F -F 2nd ADDITION
UTUITY s &THEM UAPROvwcmm
PROJMT NOZ98 REVISED
EAGA_N, MUTNESOTA
SANITARY SEWER
a
Nil . .., 2" ,...
cor w .9300
i
I
//I
Nil . .., 2" ,...
cor w .9300
® LATERAL BENEFIT
FROM TRUNK
SUN CLIFF 2nd ADDITION
UTUJTT • STPAW ntmvntwra
PROD= No.m RMww
RAGAN, MINNESOTA
WATER MAIN
Dl�! Y� il• �� �.
GD' no -9i00
L
•
0
0
0
9
SUN CLIFF tad ADDITION
l Tu2rT k mm MIROVtMMM
PROJBUT MOMS REVISED
FAGAN, MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER
�r �a mss■ • NmL OL i
i
pit[ ". [., .9[•
EOr� W 1[]00
MUINEWTA
STREETS
•
W"- w B. l...
ms .0. ""a
0
II •
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Nineteen
•
•
VACATE UTILITY EASEMENT/LAKESIDE ESTATES
D. Vacate Utility Easement, Lakeside Estates -- On May 1, the
City Council received a petition for the vacation of a drainage
and utility easement over Lots 3 and 13, Block 1, Lakeside Estates,
and subsequently scheduled a public hearing to be held on June
5. Enclosed on page is a location map referencing the
utility easements to be vacated. As can be seen, these utility
easements are centered down the referenced lots due to the previous
lot split which has since been rescinded and these lots have
now reverted to their original configuration. Notification
of this drainage and utility easement vacation has been published
in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected
private utility companies. As of this date, the staff has not
received any objection to this proposed vacation.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED -ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny. the vacation of drainage and utility easements
over Lots 3 and 13, Block 1, Lakeside Estates.
9/
' .. - - fes.. t . �! T --: r•.-� �{•� � '6..^ •i��
(�. .a4trs �� at•te ♦.. wo i
PART
OF
�A��•: .Cl. •
_ PART OF 010-82 �. b010'62 �' \ -•r -.. a
PO My d Ealoo
PARK
Iw• rm ma., ..ew1 010-00 ,a
PROPOSED VAC TIONS _9_ •'�j',I1011IslillgsI,'
e,
dw
� _ ■ ro �`F� _ � dry 4 4 •: ,
t a •ae. �� r • b
• bxr • neo S a � f'
' ATLAN7 •ran _ ,•. \ V ' e�•.w, •i' ` •I f -0 a•
£MILL '•e to 1• .. 11 `
(� w�b ORIV •.w rb • r!a •/•'Z`\ •d y' d..
' •' _,� ✓` E b All�4IsI,, Iwo
•Nj °° ni' Nom/ ''y"�¢ • dr ~• Coy
c • m ree ajO - • 10 +F' my : we. • _ i �YV• 4
t _
1 $' • G9
all
-� • t .w wo 'm S,U : 1• 8 If .'? �- O}n5 �•. to L. n., .j .:..�:
\r �_ 41 • ••°ertr. J •W rm •b r•r • • 8 •.a• . m•u.i .a ! :I8
d !1 p n
Is
Is
Is
Is
ONO ati _ � • �� '`��
b Iwo
020-00'Pp•� •'a_•, "'m-�.` t
♦: - \ � � � pP�• u:•'- :. .,:_ a a_ w:V?•:' Y - .r.
Q120-011 " ;4 NORTH ant GREENLEAF ^ro
��d woo e•an 6 ti ' ♦h
1 s v Qi 1 noo uao to re •-1111,
u.n
atb Q r ��oz
•S. r•• ♦.
SRM y$ o E w•
F q _ ; 13D-01 0 �. �. i
.zw
6W _
it
O b-' • _ • • Y Q N m •
N g• LO 1� ! ;S =_
-
Agenda Information
June 5, 1984, City
• Page Twenty
Memo
Council Meeting
VACATE STREET EASEMENT/TWIN VIEW MANOR 2ND ADDITION
E. Vacate Street Easement, Twin View Manor 2nd Addition --
When the Twin View Manor 2nd Addition was developed, Richard's
Court did not have access to Cliff Road by way of Thomas Lane
which was to be platted as a part of the Walden Heights lst
Addition. Subsequently, as a part of the development agreement,
the City required the developer to install a temporary road
access from Richard's Court out to Cliff Road across a street
easement over the west 50 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Twin View Manor
2nd Addition. With the subsequent platting of Walden Heights
lst Addition and the construction of Thomas Lane and a portion
of Richard's Court during 1983, this street easement is no longer
necessary. Therefore, the staff initiated the public hearing
to vacate this street easement so that the developer can remove
the temporary access road and develop the lot in its platted
residential manner. All notices of this public hearing have
been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially
affected public and private utilities. Due to the fact that
there are existing public and private utilities within this
area, it is recommended that the vacation be approved for street
access only and that all public utility and dr inage easements
• be retained as necessary. Enclosed on page 4!is a location
map showing the street easement vacation to be considered at
this public hearing.
•
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny the vacation of a street easement over Lot
1, Block 1, Twin View Manor 2nd Addition.
,�3
61 !' OZ >
a
P\.vdct�.m I g�e� 'j I IZ
81�Jpor-';I (i`T plL15^
LI
N II
f O i _ — _ _ — — —
SZ ZI gl 14 - . •`OY Ql l CItY of .
is .7 r 18 B: L. .
L__••Sd._.11: WALDEN E
HEIGHTS °°°" 1
:.�....•�.,�. RK
.�Oy,wIS_-••ee w,1� men—
'tY--':i:�y' r-•;oo.S• •C;I . a'^'� 'mm 1 bam� 1�- II
',w•i°rry ie 6�iY a-`� 1 C51_ •I e
•iu1 N \ DI �' Gci) kir •.eat__ •vow (\ I1" E;Y I �, Ij '�� dIS6
0 A 3AItl0 r iv^ •'' ( kn} r-` •., g 5
S
rT•- �._ }l 11 0. v / I I � I r, � Y\ .\ I a B �F� � q
Y f j@tiR1 rY&'�1/I+�1W.v• p.?a°j 1` 11 11 �8 a y\' 6 i/� I II gI1I \la �1�0. �' n \'9 �•i)' �l•_� a •- J •�'2 i.
SII .�rrri'• 91 p.j3 I� 1 91
9 JIxLy� -JIB x114 t;\ b I`N,y) p _ /J•�'�{a�'N.'
I1� •�� /•,6 Itlw � '� 4d� � f„r:,e�� "'hb"( a�;+•�!�" �II rna•d.Iwd-4r�'J:�'9, / 1 116,,.��
�` I✓r�_ _ I' II f1 II 11 I1 ♦l;+• tyvi� \i _Ji._mulfregla°�l._ Y�f �.r'N� ,a -�•T 7.__e1 r�.,b
s•rJ �. svi• _ J I_ aa�1 J 1-- � J ew 1 � . 6 � �•a �•-.� r. •�T /gv r on�rpj I ` °i; � 8r q
rm wn :. rw iam'. nmdao 'uao __r '44d ..i—�. ter: s�••'.. G .1 / ) J a b��C
rm .. 00 ,:.J •�� . f ', i n• tl wr � i y a'( �>%P ("EOia \II / I.. ' 1• •s {Ir7� -�tpi4Ko� — IT •-I
',. �_ Y IQ\N��.� N p N 1•,r ' 1.� 4 1 8 ♦�� 8 � i•4tyLvl rw�-lf mw -1 P�•"adol��lai'0'\`\ Z +�\.1r�I,�� q {�_ Gaaya 1i�� �1
F • -d 8 N • .R W • �8 A 1 I OI N fosm
N Y ✓ ., dG L Ig 1 a£af � I w'•751#d •IN CD.0 rBCI IY S b l_�P_o8�1111 I ° �Y ��\.•^n// II 71\ /Iti`~�Iron I I' nm •arr 7rl _ JL L evl J8_ ZOT
D a
'• RICHA LANE 1 --e ro'ri •ee w- 1° _ • m• •1q
-.0 u n rr•ro' em u• w n•
1w 1.. Iar • 2 `l
. � __ /-[y`/--'rii r• — AI$ '11�'/��(+_y I"
9 e C O
d d
n e , �_ D • V C..•..,_7^maw mid O�
.i ,oro
�L. r •eW fv t l >1
%'6 •rte @'LY
a 99v m. • 1; •ruuS � + 4 ` r '. Ot i /Y •W.M •'iy��� 4 n r a
.iJ`• n ii1L %.tear d O • � ,A � qaJ d SF a • Y I
w•r• q salts 8Lv ! ,
ERIK'S BOULEV4RD r �".• , „r.O ,,, .,
W SyY sdoii�� W B r
ie...•'7. rl i•iia• I2Z
-Ton ...j = rwpa.a• . / . _ @ to
N •� w �WN 6 Wr
mn 4 ; •am
•r Nit, •- aw• t •i
3; CO. RD
y
en i� n•n-"°
ur eeo
11n
sae.
ro
uo
m
O
O
a
O
0o
w
•�
-
"u IS
• u
E
n.
1
I
1.
e••
up
1m
1m
NO. s,� 31 (PILOT "Iwoe RD 1 \
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Twenty-One
•
REZONING/DRENCKHAHN
A. Alan J. and Baerbel C. Drenckhahn for Rezoning from A to
RB Consisting of Approximately .68 Acres -- A public hearing
was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting
held on May 29, 1984, to consider two applications as submitted
by Alan J. and Baerbel C. Drenckhahn. The first application
consisted of a rezoning to change the land use from an Agricultural
to a Roadside Business classification and the second application
was for a preliminary plat containing one (1) commercial lot.
The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of
the rezoning subject to the beauty parlor use, and the import
business only being allowed for a three-year term and that the
existing facility could not be expanded until utilities and platting
have been applied for. A motion was therefore granted to waive
the platting requirements at this time noting there is an existing
building on the lot and that future use would include the expansion
or addition of land to the north and to allow construction of
a fully authentic German restaurant. Enclosed on pages
through /a 6 is a copy of the City Planner's report
• regarding these applications. Also enclosed is a copy of the
minutes of the Advisory Planning Commission meeting, found on
page (s) /07 -.f' /O 7:t-
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
rezoning from A to RB and to approve or deny the waiver of platting
requirements for the Drenckhahn property.
E
95
•
J
•
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT 8 REZONING TO RB
(ROADSIDE BUSINESS)
APPLICANT: ALAN J. 8 BAERBEL C. DRENCKHAHN
LOCATION: PART OF THE SEi OF THE NEi OF SECTION 4
EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 29, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22, 1984
REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting
preliminary plat approval and rezoning for approximately .68 acres
located west of Pilot Knob Road and south of 494.
ZONING AND LAND USE
Presently the parcel is zoned A (Agricultural) and would not allow
any further development until the property was rezoned. The Compre-
hensive Guide designates this parcel as RB (Roadside Business
District) which would allow development in accordance with freeway
access and service to the transient population. The applicant is
proposing to zone in accordance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan
and requests a zoning of RB (Roadside Business) for this particular
parcel.
COMMENTS
The applicant is proposing to remodel the 1,354 square foot struc-
ture into a gift shop and hair salon. The proposed plan conforms
to the setback, parking and lot coverage requirements of the City
Code. The applicant is presently operating a beauty parlor as a
home occupation. This business would relocate to the proposed new
location.
The main issue seems to be whether or not the proposed use is
compatible with the RB designation being applied for. The Drenck-
hahn's long range plan would include the acquisition and rezoning
to RB of the land north of the subject parcel for construction of
a German restaurant. If this is accomplished, the RB zoning would
be contiguous and conforming to the Land Use Guide Plan designation.
If approved the plat should be subject to the following conditions:
1) The plat be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's
review since it abuts a county road.
2) The plan be submitted to the City Engineering Department
for approval of the drainage and grading alterations.
94
0
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
ALAN J. & BAERBEL DRENCKHAHN
MAY 29, 1984
PAGE 2.
3) An appropriate bond be obtained to insure conformance with
the landscaping plan.
4) All other City ordinances shall be adhered to.
97
•
•
E
IN..FOR
t-1 'OT, •
J ` +
358
358'
-NIn-
11 1 PPI`PFN'IV _[W P114Q •'
�m
1
_ I
it j(wjFl4*,k 4r s' J
v
0
0
cr
•
a;w YY
ud..
-NIn-
11 1 PPI`PFN'IV _[W P114Q •'
�m
1
_ I
it j(wjFl4*,k 4r s' J
v
0
0
cr
j/.•moi '�r�''""i{•--- - -
*LOST SPUR
/ COUNTRY
CLUB
PF
_•may � ..,,..y � �Q �
in do i / - [VALLEY I i
I - ®-
R-1
R-1
11
r_i
LB R
. RLI
TREF LE (ACRE5-1
/ o {UNDII1 I �A I I I1
'a I I I I
-4I R-4
-il R-4
t.-2
IV I L- , •o L/ v i 1-I n r
J
77-- N MM- 808- 2
- 10
• " � TIN T VJ*#LH
GB
��
`��4%.
Mrawfill
ME
L,gn rr —
PF
u
a
10,
N
A
PrA
W
n
%DDI1
NB
NNW
L
/r
/
Ga
.6 .... !Y.RB
Ind
1 ' • ..., riQ_. - / •r ..: s.� p Ind„
PL
�-
.. • '%-- _ .� ..
Ina
.*'--�• �7 :,_��..'�f�,j�(.�g� '.._.----
fl
GE
6ROSEMOUNQ�_
a_
MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
• C/O DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
FROM: RICHARD M. HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
DATE: MAY 25, 1984
SUBJECT: DRENCKHAHN PRELIMINARY PLAT
The Engineering Division of the Department of Public Works has
the following comments concerning this proposed development for
consideration by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council.
GRADING/DRAINAGE
A detailed grading plan will be required indicating how storm
water run-off from the parking area will be handled.
UTILITIES
Existing utilities capable of providing service to this proposed
development consists of only a 12" trunk watermain located along
the the westside of Pilot Knob Road. However, this proposed
development lies within the N -J sanitary sewer sub -district as
depicted in Figure 1. At this time, there are no lateral sanitary
sewer mains in this sub -district. The closest sanitary sewer
• to this proposed development is located approximately 300 feet
east of Pilot Knob Road in Corporate Center Drive (Old Eagan
Industrial Road). This is approximately 500 feet from this proposed
development. Although preliminary review by staff indicates
the sewer is deep enough in this location, it would not be feasible
to extend this sewer any further west due to the fact that existing
pavement would have to be removed and replaced and it would not
be enough room without obtaining an easement or removing and
replacing the bituminous pathway along the westside of Pilot
Knob Road to install a sewer line to service this parcel. Besides,
the amount of area which could be served by this sewer would
be limited since the land in this area generally slopes to the
west. Therefore, it would appear to be more appropriate to service
sub -district N -J from laterals from the trunk sanitary sewer
located within this sub -district.
Servicing this proposed development with sanitary sewer at this
time may not be all that appropriate when one considers the immedi-
ate proposed use being for a beauty salon and gift shop. However,
it would be imperative that sanitary sewer be available if and
when this proposed development includes the restaurant facility
which was mentioned at the previous Planning Commission meeting
by the applicants.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY
• A fifty -foot public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for
Pilot Knob Road as a condition of this plat. In addition, a
ten -foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all
publicly dedicated right-of-way with a five-foot utility and
/0/
I
ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 24, 1984
PAGE TWO •
drainage easement being dedicated adjacent to all exterior lot
lines.
ASSESSMENTS
As a condition of final platting, this development shall be respon-
sible for trunk area storm sewer and lateral benefit from trunk
watermain. In addition to the above assessments which would
be determined at the commercial rate, the water area assessment
must be upgraded from residential to commercial. All assessment
rates will be the rates which are in effect at the time of final
platting.
At this time, the above assessments would amount to the following:
Water Area - .578 Acres X $2,830 per acre = $1,662 - $150
(1972 Single Family Rate Assessed) = $1,512
Trunk Area .Storm Sewer - 25,560 Square Feet X $.068 per
square foot = $1,738
Lateral Benefit From Trunk Water - 83 Feet X $17.87 per
front foot = $1,483 •
I will be available to discuss any aspect of this report with
the Advisory Planning Commission at their meeting of May 29,
1984.
Respectfully sub fitted,
Richard M. Hef P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS
I) A detailed grading & drainage plan shall be submitted for
approval by Staff.
2) A 50' public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot
Knob Road, along with easements as referenced in this report.
3) This development shall be responsible for trunk water and storm
sewer area assessments and lateral benefit from trunk watermain
at the rates in effect at final platting.
•
s. MENDOTA \ 'HTS
• :� - North \ ,
Flnterceptor
\
GUN CLV9 _ , —:v. ` 5 N -L'. \\ \\:� •.
v 3U"- ♦ �•
_LaE _ - /.'.�.�---ppv.L//r��..LL �J a
SU �CT� F71 CSL
/ Qi
N=H N -N - \�/ f —� I!S' `I♦
1 36'L Lu TPrrrLE]CP-G I �r , ' /. / ♦�
ihl h$rPrSt W.HK -O[I
83
36"�= �i N -G / — 15"
I� _ •� 112" N -P
��• I fir"
12" d I. �I / I I
15 N-0
/®-
I
/ C -C --I 1
1 •_// N -E
-B 1 P N - V N -U
I
/. -
26 30" r— ------- I 12°
_ 7C7D rat
I12It sop
rktiww;
;`m
acres .
.d,• / 12' 12'• .`�c, �� 1
5 C-00
C -NN ;
29 ;�LAKE-
�a6
�_�s- ` 33 _Ti■■ ■\/t1� n: .. — _�'S�(j�� _ _ 112" OLCCK�441 V^� ` / • M ET ,.1
---
S W� c•
C
,
r
APC AFTERNOON AFTER
• May 29, 1984
The following is a brief account of what transpired at the May 29,
1984, Advisory Planning Commission meeting.
OLD BUSINESS
A. ALAN J. AND BAERBEL C. DRAENCKHAHN, for rezoning A (Agricul-
tural) to RB (Roadside Business) consisting of approximately
.68 acres and Preliminary Plat also of consisting of the
.68 acres and containing one (1) commercial lot. In part
of the SE; of the NE;, Section 4 west of Pilot Knob Road.
Discussion and Action
Advisory Planning Commission noted that this item has been on the
agenda for several meetings and that the applicants have now submit-
ted a request to plot the property along with the original request
to rezone from Agricultural to Roadside Business. The Planning
Commission reviewed this particular item in two parts. First the
proposed zoning request, noting that the applicants are proposing
to rezone in accordance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. However,
the uses may not specifically fit the RB zoning at this time but
thatin the long range goal the Draenckhahns are proposing, would
be consistent with RB or Roadside Business zoning. After a lengthy
• discussion regarding the use of the property on a tentative basis
the Commission then reviewed the Preliminary Plat noting with this
plat request there will be direct access off of Pilot Knob Road.
Also, there is a surface road provided to the north which would
probably provide access to the westerly portion of the lot and re-
move the direct access from Pilot Knob Road. The Commission noted
that this is hopefully the long range plan and should be reviewed
by the Engineering Department. The Commission also noted that this
is also the direction or the location in which this particular
parcel would have accessibility to utilities in the area. After
discussing the platting versus waiving the plat and the uses propos-
ed, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning
subject to the beauty parlor use and import business only being
allowed for a three year term and that the existing facility could
not be expanded until utilities and platting has been applied for.
This motion was approved unanimously by the Planning Commission.
The second motion was to waive the platting requirements at this
particular time noting that there is an existing building on the
lot and that future use would include the expansion or addition
of land to the north and a use of a full authentic German restaurant.
Noting that other activity is occuring within the general area,
that platting may not be too far in the future, the Commission waiv-
ed this request with a condition that the applicant provide or meet
the conditions set forth in the May 22, 1984 Staff Report. This
item has been scheduled for the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting
• for Council consideration.
/0 7Z
Advisory Planning Commission
Afternoon After - May 29, 1984
Page Two
B. SIENNA CORPORATION (ROD HARDY), for Preliminary Plat, Birch
Park Addition consisting of approximately 43 acres and con-
taining 73 single family lots. Located in Outlots B, C,
D, and F Windcrest Second Addition.
Discussion and Action
r ,
E
Advisory Planning Commission noted that this item had been continued
from the April 24, 1984, Advisory Planning Commission, in order
to get background information from the original platting which oc-
cured in 1979. The Commission also had requested that Staff look
at the accesses onto Deerwood Drive and how many access points Birch
Park Addition would have. The applicants had revised their original
plat and reduced four lots on Deerwood Drive, which would have 200
feet of frontage and would be more consistent with the lot sizes
that presently exist along Deerwood Drive. with these revisions,
The Planning Commission again reviewed this Preliminary Plat noting
that.the applicant had made revisions and tried to incorporate the
concerns of the Surrounding neighbors. The biggest issue that was
discussed in regard to this revised plat, is the Fawn Ridge street
which would be eliminated with this revised plat. As you recall,
Fawn Ridge Street provided an access to a property to the west which
topographically would have been hard to service from Pilot Knob •
Road. The applicant also indicated that the feasibility or the
cost of this road was excessive and preferred not to provide this
street connection. After substantial review and input from the
surrounding neighbors, the Advisory Planning Commission recommended
approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to the conditions of the
Staff Report with the addition that driveway accesses to the lots
on Deerwood Drive be reviewed and approved by City Staff in order
to provide the best access in regard to topography and vegetation.
Also, the Planning Commission recommended that the conditions of
the original planned development initiated in 1979 also be adhered
to with this revision to the Preliminary Plat. Also, that adequate
storm sewer easement be obtained by this development in order to
provide proper drainage across the McCarthy property. This item was
originally scheduled for the June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
for Council consideration, however, the applicant is requesting
that this item be placed on the June 19, 1984, City Council Meeting
for Council consideration. Therefore, note this particular chage
and request by the applicant.
C. SIENNA CORPORATION (ROD HARDY), FOR Preliminary Plat Pilot
Pointe consisting of approximately 8.8 acres and containing
20 single family lots, locted in part of the NW; of Section
22, east of Pilot Knob Road.
Discussion and Action
The Advisory Planning Commission reviewed the Preliminary Plat Pilot •
Pointe noting that this particular plat was the parcel which
/0 "5r
•
•
•
Advisory Planning
Afternoon After -
Page Three
Commission Meeting
May 29, 1984
access to be provided to from Birch Park Addition, therefore, the
approval of Birch Park Addition with the elimination of Fawn Ridge
Drive allowed for the cul-de-sac to be provided from Pilot Knob
Road. The Preliminary Plat consists of 8.8 acres and the applicant
is proposing to plat 20 single family lots all which meet or exceed
the R-1 residential single district zoning requirements. Access
to these lots would be from a cul-de-sac off of Pilot Knob Road.
the main reason this particular plat is in at this time, is in
conjunction with I -35E construction. This particular development
is contingent on obtaining approximately 250,000 cubic feet of fill
in order to obtain the proper grades to provide proper access to
this development. After a great deal of discussion and input from
the surrounding neighbors, the Advisory Planning Commission did
recommend approval of this particular plat contingent on the condi-
tions in the Staff Report. Also, with the addition that storm drain-
age easements be obtained from the McCarthy property in order that
the proper storm drainage and ponding areas can be obtained to
handle the runoff from this development. The Commission also sug-
gested that condition #4 of the Engineering Report be eliminated
and that the north/south access easement be allowed as proposed
by the developer. With these changes, the application has been
scheduled for the June 19, 1984, City Council Agenda for Council
consideration.
D. Mr. Hall then brought up that he had received a request from
Federal Land for the Commission to hold a special Public Hearing
in order that Federal Lane could obtain the shortest possible pro-
cessing time the schedule could allow. Federal Lan had requested
that a special Planning Commission meeting be held on June 18, in
order that they could save two weeks in the processing of their
particular request. The Planning Commission reviewed this request
noting that they have not held a special Public Hearing or special
meeting to review development proposals in the past and that this
particular request is not any different then the requests that they
have received in the past and elected not to hold a special meeting
in order to process this application. With that the Commission
recommended they be placed on the regular schedule and be processed
in accordance with the policies and procedures of the City.
E. Dale Runkle introduced Mr. Greg Ingraham who has been hired
recently in a fulltime position in the Planning Department for the
City. Mr. Runkle had indicated that with an additional person in
the Planning Department we will then be able to start to update
studies and reports to obtain up-to-date figures and up -date
portions of the Comprehensive Plan where these figures and numbers
were gathered 5 years ago. The City will also be using John Voss
also to help provide the information in order to update this
material. There being no further business, the Planning Commission
meeting adjourned approximately 9:30 p.m.
166
APC Minutes
May 29, 1984 •
ALAE DRAENC®AHN - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAY
The public hearings regarding the application of Alan J. Draenckhahn and
Baerbel Draenckhahn for rezoning from A (Agricultural) to RB (Roadside Busi-
ness) and for preliminary plat approval of approximately 6.68 acres in part of
the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 4 on the west side
of Pilot Knob Road was convened by Chairman Hall. Dale Runkle, City Planner,
detailed the two applications, noting that the property is zoned Agricultural
and the Comprehensive Guide designates the parcel as RB (Roadside Business
District). The proposal by the applicants is to remodel the 1,354 square foot
structure into a gift shop and hair salon with possible restaurant to be
constructed in the future.
The main issue concerned whether or not the proposed use is compatible
with the RB designation, noting the land north of the parcel was intended to
be purchased by the applicants. Mr. & Mrs. Draenckhahn were present and
questions were raised by Planning Commission members, including whether the
real estate tax value would increase because of the preliminary plat versus a
waiver of plat. The proposal by the Draenckhahns at the present was to apply •
for waiver of plat, rather than the final plat, noting that the parcel is
intended to be expanded in the future. Mr. Runkle stated that the plat could
be required at the time the restaurant is applied for. Member Wold was
concerned about the RB zoning for gift shop and hair salon, noting that it may
not be appropriate in RB zoned areas, according to the Ordinance. There were
no objections from neighboring property owners and the Draenckhahns indicated
they did not expect signage would be necessary along Pilot Knob Road.
The planning commission members generally felt the application was prema-
ture for platting because a curb out may not be appropriate if the service
road is extended in the future. After considerable discussion, Hall moved,
Krob seconded the motion to recommend rezoning to RB on a conditional basis
for the two uses, including hair salon and gift shop as applied for by the
applicant for a maximum period of three years with the understanding that no
expansion of the present use or building would be permitted during that period
of time; further, that at the end of the three year period, that the applicant
must then apply for and acquire approval of an application for preliminary
plat approval or the conditional zoning would cease and the uses would then
terminate; further, it was recommended that the Planning Commission and
Council extend the time in the event that adequate hardship is shown. All
voted in favor. Hall then moved, Krob seconded the motion to recommend
approval of an application for waiver of plat, subject to the following condi-
tions:
1. That the waiver will be permitted for a maximum of three years
unless hardship is shown and extended by the City Council. •
2
/0-/
- . APC Minutes
May 29, 1984
2. The plat shall be subject to the Dakota County Plat Commission's
review since it abuts a county road.
3. The plan shall be submitted to the City Engineering Department for
approval of the drainage and grading alterations.
4. An appropriate bond shall be obtained to insure conformance with the
landscaping plan.
5. All other City ordinances shall be adhered to.
6. A detailed grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for approval
by staff.
7. A 50 foot public half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Pilot Knob
Road, in addition to further easement if service road is required, along with
easements as referenced in this report.
8. This development shall be responsible for trunk water and storm
sewer area assessments and lateral benefit from trunk watermain at the rates
• in effect at final platting.
All voted in favor.
0
3
/07 a,
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Twenty -Two
CONTRACT 84-11/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS
B. Contract 84-11, Approve Plans 8 Specifications/Authorize
Advertisement for Bids (Oak Cliff Pond Outlet) -- On May 15,
the staff prematurely presented the detailed plans and specifications
for Council review for the installation of the lift station
and force main outlet for Oak Cliff Pond within the Oak Cliff
development adjacent to Slater's Road. This plan review was
premature due to the fact that the technical public hearing
process could not be completed until the June 5 Council meeting.
With Project 400 being considered by the City Council earlier
on the agenda under Public Hearings, and if it is approved,
it would now be appropriate to formally approve the detailed
plans and specifications then authorize the advertisement for
bids. These detailed plans were prepared in advance due to
the fact that the developer signed a petition guaranteeing all
costs associated with the preparation should the project not
be approved by Council action under the Public Hearing agenda
item. All easements necessary for the installation of this
project under Contract 84-11 have been acquired through the
final plat of the Oak Cliff development which was approved by
• Council action on April 17, 1984.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify
the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-11 and,
if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to
be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 29.
C,
J
M.,
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Three
•
PRELIMINARY PLAT/BIRCH PARK ADDITION
A. Sienna Corporation for Preliminary Plat, Birch Park Addition
Consisting of Approximately 43 Acres and Containing 77 Dwelling
Units in Outlots B, C, D, E and F, Windcrest 2nd Addition --
A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission
at their last regular meeting held on May 29, 1984, to consider
a preliminary plat application for Birch Park Addition as submitted
by Sienna Corporation. This item was originally scheduled for
the June 5, 1984, City Council meeting. However, due to an absence
by the property owner, the item is rescheduled for the June 19
meeting. There are approximately six to eight neighbors on Deerwood
Drive that were noticed for the public hearing at the Advisory
Planning Commission meeting and they have been notified by the
Planning Department that this item will be continued until the
June 19 meeting. Information regarding this item will be presented
with the City Council packet for that meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a contin-
uance of the preliminary plat application for Birch Park Addition
until the June 19 City Council meeting.
E
/0 f
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Is
Page Twenty -Four
•
WAIVER OF PLAT/OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION
B. Corporate Construction for Waiver of Plat to Split a Duplex
Lot for Individual Ownership, Oakwood Heights 2nd Addition - An
application was made for waiver of Plat to split a duplex lot
for individual ownership described as Lot 2, Block 1, Oakwood
Heights 2nd Addition. The applicant was Corporate Construction
and for additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
Department report found on pages 11t through //�_/= -
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Waiver of Plat as requested by Corporate Construction.
//0
CITY OF EAGAN
• SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION
LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND
EXISTING ZONING: R-2ITION
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 5, 1984
DATE OF REPORT; JUNE 1, 1984
REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I
APPLICATION SUBMITTED:
ing a waiver of plat An application has
ownership, in order been submitted
to split a duplex lot request -
COMMENTS: for individual
Lot 2,
Block 1, is an approved
square feet which exceeds the 15,000
is a newt quare duplex lot of
to divide y constructed square foot 15,505
for duplex unit which requirement. There
the individual ownershi the
splitting of this p Staff applicant would like
subject to all lot. If approved, finds no problems with
other City ordinance ruir the lot split • quirements, s should be
/ J
Gre?g_ In r
GHI:jbd
attachments
•
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
N /F"011"nu'i
I�
SED
EL
b
h
O T12
c4OPOSED°ARCELaa
5
Al 830-3-3141"W
CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION
159.94
\A\\PR
O .DRdY1
= N
\ \ a ��+
91I4 XHlJq
�43 �
Di— j
\W N--
p0 94K I
••943.3
28.00\
a
CAR O P"Pose� .
DR/Yf�yy
24.00 00
28D0
I
"'8.30'334111W
83 �� 52.00
`334/ w /49.30
O DENOTES IRON
MONUMENT PROPOSED DESCRIPTIONS
PARCEL A
-'- .9r,19
J
I'
9018 Xa,0.2r1
I
25
The northerly 50.00 feet,as measured at right angles,of Lot 2, Block 1, OAKWOOD
HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County,
Minnesota.
PARCEL B
Lot 2, Block 1, OAKWOOD HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Dakota County, Minnesota, except the northerly 50.00 feet, as measured at riaht
angles, of said Lot 2.
WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISON AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND
SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY,
rno+ //2,0
^,.
OAKWOOD
L^1
.
'l.l •
MW COC M[\ b
aera6.3a•E
of s. E)
Ii
OUTLOT R
W
942x25
I , b cI % • T ' 443y9._!547
ID
' 9445-43
1$mo 719f 11_ 10\�t"
HEIGHT
2ND ADDITION
Y
+.n141
z6-
°
14 t
�•'1'n'.rR'�,,'U`;h76a-51 �a9• I n-.r•r.
.1 �\<n �i,i �1�9t ���a JBL ¢��� � � �!'�r•Y ��� � °�
W
S[�-� q/rE•ss ° . w!C 0 �� tai �n� L �".vr�s' ` '/e�/
OUTLOT e
I
p040 4�
" t
"
hb /
UE"s U2
/
OEROr[9 II=
O "PMERAT IOR
Ci
/ O
A. DD2Esa MAP
p
Z. PD
z,
W
74-I
0,
Z.
I
!�ri�"'
EM
■ �tilG
• 1�1111�
own
CzN
RIM-
calf �t/'� �'�•-'7'' � ���q/ �
EXCEPTION
(NOT INCLUDED
IN PARK)
RM
A.
In
Fi I
r
LM
Z. PD
z,
W
74-I
0,
Z.
I
!�ri�"'
EM
■ �tilG
• 1�1111�
own
CzN
RIM-
calf �t/'� �'�•-'7'' � ���q/ �
EXCEPTION
(NOT INCLUDED
IN PARK)
RM
•
C1
J
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Five
VARIANCE/SUNCLIFF DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
C. Suncliff Development Company for a Variance from the Sideyard
Setback Along a Public Street, Suncliff 1st Addition -- An applica-
tion was presented by Suncliff Development Company for a variance
from the sideyard setback along public street within Suncliff
1st Addition. For additional information on this item, refer
to the Planning Department report, a copy is found on pages
1/4 through /.2 .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
variance application as presented by Suncliff Development Company.
• CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCES
APPLICANT: ADVANCE DEVELOPERS
LOCATION: 8 LOTS IN SUN CLIFF 1ST ADDITION, SEC. 29
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 PD
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 5, 1984
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 31, 1984
REPORTED BY: GREG H. INGRAHAM, PLANNER I
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting
side yard setbacks on 8 single family lots located in Sun Cliff
1st Addition (see attached list & plan).
COMMENTS: Suncliff lst Addition is a small lot subdivision which
received Final Plat approval on October 18, 1983. The variances
being requested are all on corner lots of interior streets except
for Lots 1, Block 3 which is on Beaver Dam Road.
is The City Code requires a 30' setback from the R.O.W. of a public
street. The applicant is requesting 101_, 7' and 5' variances from
that requirement.
The reason for the variance request is to accomodate the various
house plans onto the corner lots. If the full 30' setback was re-
quired it would be very difficult to locate or place structures
on these particular lots. This variance request was originally
asked for with the overall plan, however, the minutes of July 19,
1983, state that this must be applied for. Attached is a copy of
the July 19, 1983 minutes for your review. .
If approved, the variances should be subject to the following
conditions:
1) All other conditions of the Suncliff P.D. Agreement.
2) All other conditions and ordinances be adhered to.
• Greg H. Ingrah m
GHI:jbd
attachments
116
a
0
List of lots with requested variance:
Lot 13, Block,l, Sun Cliff First Addition
10' side yard variance on Timber Wolf Trail
Lot 1, Block 2, Sun Cliff First Addition
10' side yard variance on Timber Wolf Trail
Lot 13, Block 2, Sun Cliff First Addition
7' side yard variance on Bear Path Trail
Lot 1, Block 3, Sun Cliff First Additon
5' side yard variance on Beaver Dam Road
Lot 11, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition
10' side yard variance on Sunset Road
Lot 25, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition •
10' side yard variance on Sunset Road
Lot 26, Block 4, Sun Cliff First Addition
10' side yard variance on Sunset Road
Lot 1, Block 5, Sun Cliff First Addition
10' variance on Sunset Road
//7
0
•
Council Minutes
' July 19, 1983
171
SON CLIFF - PREL11MURY PLAT
The application of Advance Developers, Inc. for preliminary plat approval
of Sun Cliff Addition, consisting of approximately 89.1 acres and containing
277 dwelling units was next considered. The Advisory Planning Commission
heard the application on July 12, 1983 and recommended denial including those
reasons contained in the Advisory Planning Commission minutes. Dave
Sellergren was present and indicated that the proposal is to change the use
t
-� from R-4 to R-1 plus a few duplex units, with a total of 274 units. He statea
a meeting had been held with neighboring owners and that all single family
homes would now be built on.Beaver Dam Road with the exception of one duplex
corner unit. The minimum width would be 60 feet at the building setback line.
He further stated that there would be proposals for amendments to the planned
development, including the extension of Beaver Dam Road southerly and also,
the south area would be proposed to be transformed into a mixed development,
including housing, and commercial uses. He further requested that 20 foot
setbacks be allowed -on interior lots because the streets would be 60 feet in
width, according to staff recommendation. Also, a trail would be eliminated
to the pond to the north. Several neighbors were present and generally agreed
with the proposal, with no objections. Mr. Sellergren stated that the intent
is
of the applicant is to rezone'each of the phases as the time of request for
final plat approval. Thomas moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the
application, subject to the following conditions:
1. The developer shall submit an application for variance for lots and
internal streets for setback purposes.
2. The developer shall impose restrictive covenants for for maintenance
of the duplexes, rather than the imposition of a requirement for Homeowners
Association.
3. Deviation from lot size shall be in accordance with the exibit
submitted stating all lot sizes within this development.
4. The 30 footsetbackshall be allowed on Beaver Dam Road.
5. The parkland proposal shall be reviewed by the Park Commission and
be subject to their recommendation.
6. The development agreement shall be signed prior to the application
of final plat.
7. The plat shall be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission
because it abuts a County Road.
8. All other applicable ordinances shall be complied with.
• 9. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff.
All voted in favor.
SEE PLAT FILE
//F,
I , SUN CLIFF FIRST ADDITION •"
�
ADOR HOUSEESSES
rr%i!r /idlt [....•.. a.. nn r [y.. e.n r.nn+ r�
r • /6. 1, lr H•y •w+ [ 'Ok+dle•wil—_-� � i r r
I�- �y.- __ As. •A.f ;�, n � r , 4. .y -r f �-•��.i'u--wo--- ntre. n. °.
r—=rrr ,p��r 41�' ,wA� • �T • � .;w�.4t �.• 'w • w'rio .')'+ •� ° •�+� • •' ( .
16 \\ • :�eP I: � c' f '��"�' Ta, • 4 !'. � + F, '1•r i+� !y
� \�•� .1 L'T n I ya a e r +•i.e i re _ �\
•`j� A l e
\ \ � yr � P �\ �.�1.,.r .! .rte• I�
w:r may, %, •fss• • .s rn.; rr ![ =1 •r
Ile
It
,�I `t \ t +�>,r � • �: .y� 't• �;t k nil, � 1M`•�.�. i � �•
/� ,w .t,, e, sl.,\. n'c :• a AIN
yft sl -
r4+0 /-0` � '�.� to �n 1',�� 1 � t•s
� f>Imm A
�s �.Y ��i 0° .w� n • ,V �wYn .V •+r .fir". lV 'i
Lei[ � r = _ t 4/j:, / \\ i y� • ti,� rl�• R ,,% '� .I
ppppppw��
Cll MTNDCN D AS SOCIAT(S, INf;• �"'- I
v� �Q t C.R.-WINDEN 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
jj�J LAND SURVEYORS Tel {46-394{
1381 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 66106
For:
KEY—LAND HOMES
• NOTE:
D Denotes Wooden Stake
Proposed Garage Floor E1...M.03
(SEB.7) Denotes Proposed
Finished Ground E1.
Ir' Q —.1 Denotes Direction
ft Of Surface Drainage
Cb OyP Vertical Datum - N.G.V.D. 1929
J�f 10
/ \ iZ6•�9' fore Scale: 1" = 30'
oc Zy iy ���; C Denotes Iron
•P M, r Monument
O /
/O / `aQ � 30 O
/6.3 yi• / `l
b a:
BF \d �
r
q Ty Zy.E //o
Lot 13, Block 2, SUN CLIFF FIRST
ADDITION, Dakota Coanty, Minnesota.
WE MEREST CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVET OF THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF All BUILDINGS. IF ANY.
THEREON, AND All VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND.
•Doted this Il th dot, of AF.ri I A D 1954 C. R. WINDEN L ASSOCIATES. INC.
lor
S,,••vor. M,nn•,ol• toR.,lrol:on No 7
7�
/.2-0
CP
.7
t
< t19
LOT 13, BLOCK
SGALE•. I" - 30'—O"
9
N
C,
•
W 0/ 91"
For: McKlyn Construction, Inc.
•
Q
Q 3
C. R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
LAND SURVEYORS T*L 646.3646
1711 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 66108
S
Scale: 1" - 30'
\ Ns' 0.
NOTE: 6 O
G Denotes.Iron Monument ?9•.
s Denotes Wooden Stake F (C5
Proposed garage floor E: -e23.3
(800.0) Denotes proposed finishee: ground E1.
. me— Denotes direction of surface drainage
Vertical Datum - N.G.V.D. 1929
'19/4
v
Lot 1, Block 3, :>ULJ CLIFF FIRST ADDITION
Dakota County, Minnesota
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE Df SCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF All BUILDINGS, IF ANY,
THEREON, AND All VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND
•Doled IAu 14 rA day of F " '/1 A D. fV B4
C. R./+ DIN a ASSOCIATES, INC.
Uv
S�..oYer, M.nnewre Repnvorron No 77?G
/ 0
62e -
>
r41�
lb
o
� \
\\�
C
Q
Q
►�'�
n) t
v V
/01 \
O
/S
/
o v�. • i
JZ '
LOT I I, BLOCK 4
SCALE = P'= 30'-0"
/.23
0
0
•
0
•
0
S�NSF T
r
So,
4m•
r
r
I
r
L07 ZS, BLOCK 4
SCALE: I"= 30' - O"
171
-k\N -
0 0
�1�N �33a
DO \
H
Uo
O
10
P.
171
171
LOT Z (,o, BLOCK
SCALE: I" =ZO'-O"
12(�
m
N
v
n
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Twenty -Six
•
RESOLUTION/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
D. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance for a Resolution Providing
for a Concurrent Detachment of Incorporated Land -- At the last
regular City Council meeting, the City Planner and City Administra-
tor reviewed a parcel of property north of and adjacent to Inter-
state 494 that is partly in the City of Mendota Heights and
partly in the City of Eagan. There is a request by Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance that this property be annexed to provide
continuity for development purposes. For further information
on this item, refer to a memorandum prepared by the City Planner
found on pages /.2 through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Resolution providing for concurrent detachment and annexation
of incorporated land as requested by Northwestern Mutual Life
Insurance Company.
1zQ
• MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
DATE: MAY 31, 1984
SUBJECT: DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY FOR NORTHWESTERN
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
As you may recall at the last City Council meeting, the City Council
suggested Staff review to look into the potential and possibilities
as to what could be done in order that agreements or transactions
could be made for these slivers of property which now are basically
detached from Eagan and Mendota Heights by the construction of
I-494. In reviewing these small isolated parcels, the recommenda-
tion for its request by Northwestern Mutual Life and Northland
Mortgage Company is the detachment and annexation procedure which
will then transfer these parcels to the City of Mendota Heights.
This then would allow for a continuous parcel in which Northland
Mortgage is proposing to develop at this time in Mendota Heights.
In reviewing .the overall northern boundary of the City of Eagan,
it appears that on the east side of the interchange of I-494 and
I -35E that the same situation will occur, however, there will be
• slivers of Mendota Heights property in the City of Eagan. Hopefully,
the same transaction will occur on the easterly side of this inter-
change as what is occurring on the west. In review of this, the
City is not just giving away property to the City of Mendota Heights
but will mutually work out where Mendota Heights will also be giving
Eagan some property in the future.
Enclosed with this memorandum is a Resolution that the City of
Mendota Heights approved on May 15, 1984. Staff has also included
a Resolution which the City of Eagan can adopt stating the similar
information required for the concurrent detachment and annexation
procedures. Once each of the Cities have adopted these Resolutions
and if both Cities agree, it is a fairly simple task going through
the process of annexation. Also, enclosed is a survey provided
by Northwestern Mutual Life showing the parcels which are being
annexed by the City of Mendota Heights. If you have any questions
or would like additional information regarding this particular. item,
please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Dale C. Runkle
• DCR:jbd
Attachments
CITY OF EAGAN
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA •
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR CONCURRENT DETACHMENT
AND ANNEXATION OF INCORPORATED LAND
WHEREAS, certain contiguous parcels of land falling within
the corporate limits of the City of Eagan, at the southern boundary
of the City of Mendota Heights, have been separated from the major
portion of the City of Eagan as the result of I-494 construction;
and
WHEREAS, the parcels of land, currently owned by Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance Company, are bounded on the north by -the
southern boundary of a portion of the Mendota Heights Industrial
Park; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the owners of the property and
Northland Land Company that the land be acquired by Northland Land
Company; and
WHEREAS, the property is isolated by the freeway from the
majority of Eagan and is a natural extension of both, both abutting
the Mendota Heights Industrial Park and the corporate limits of •
Mendota Heights;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Eagan that the City Council is desirous of detaching
Parcels No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 shown and described on the Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance Company Composite Survey attached hereto;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Minnesota Municipal Board
is hereby requested to order the concurrent detachment of the des-
cribed parcels from the corporate limits of the City of Eagan and
its annexation into the corporate limits of the City of Mendota
Heights in accordance with the provisions of Minne:;ota Statutes,
Section 414.061
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan this 5th day of
June, 1984.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF EAGAN
By
130
•
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
• RESOLUTION NO. 84- 30
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR CONCURRENT DETACHMENT
AND ANNEXATION OF INCORPORATED LAND
WHEREAS, certain contiguous parcels of land falling within the corporate
limits of the City of Eagan, at the southern boundary of the City of Mendota
Heights, have been separated from the major portion of the City of Eagan as
the result of I-494 construction; and
WHEREAS, the parcels of land, currently owned by Northwestern Mutual
Life Insurance Company, are bounded on the north by the southern boundary
of a portion of the Mendota Heights Industrial Park; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the owners of the property and Northland
Land Company that the land be acquired by Northland Land Company; and
WHEREAS, the property is isolated by the freeway from the majority
of Eagan and is a natural extension of both, both abutting the Mendota
Heights Industrial Park and the corporate limits of Mendota Heights;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights that the City Council is desirous of annexing Parcels
No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 shown and described on the Northwestern Mutual Life
is Insurance Company Composite Survey attached hereto; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Minnesota Municipal Board is hereby
requested to order the concurrent detachment of the described parcels from
the corporate limits of the City of Eagan and its annexation into the cor-
porate limits of the City of Mendota Heights in accordance with the pro-
visions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 414.061.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 15th day of
May, 1984.
ATTEST:
K.Irthleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
r�L
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
44�,,Z l o(trC�^'
Robert G. Lockwood, Mayor
l3/
�• a u,v
.err r1...I
a VVn
COMPOSITE SURVEY FOR
NORTHWESTERN4kUTUAL LIFE
• r 4r•u.., �..�r.w�11 F•a s•r•.nr
••.'I•A
IACfl / �•�nn.11 VJYfiIIt�
ICRC[,. , ... .I
INSURANCE CO.
If.1l'.: �: •�i�i. is r
I .
.,•w r .n y V,
od..
r�
u
_wr
nil e, v.eatn•1...
+�• = � _'_ _ ' ; ,v .YMp � s.rwiw..r Von VF. I .... .•v wlTr^... w�. C
I A94
_Lr ys
r.•n
PINT RSTATE— c �• -
•tea. .w ...H �
4 • 'I i�9 I• S + , 1. I I
,
j • ]SID
h `
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Seven
MUNICIPAL CENTER LANDSCAP
A. Municipal Center Landscaping -- Following the referendum
for the Municipal Center project, a budget was approved by the
City Council in the amount of $10,000 to complete landscaping
around the Police Department -Municipal Center complex. With
the amount of black dirt required to properly grade the area,
the cost for sod, trees, bushes and other landscape material,
the budget will not be adequate to complete the project. In
addition, an identification sign was proposed on Pilot Knob
Road to identify the Municipal Center building which was not
budgeted for as a part of the project. The Director of Parks
and Recreation was directed to prepare a design for an identifica-
tion sign and budget for completing the landscaping at the Municipal
Center building. The memorandum and final design work have
not been completed, however will be included with the Administrative
Agenda packet on Monday. It is important to consider finalization
of the landscaping so the work can be completed before the hot
months occur in July and August.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
• changes to the Municipal Center landscaping plan.
E
133
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Eight
BURNSVILLE/EAGAN CABLE COMMISSION
B. Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission -- Periodically, the City
Administrator places the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission item
on the official agenda to provide an update on the progress
being made by Group W in their efforts to fulfill the franchise
agreement. The City Administrator will provide a report regarding
the time schedule for installation of cable television at the
meeting on Tuesday.
The Cable Communications Commission has been operating with
dollars that were generated from a $10,000 franchising application
fee. The Commission is to be funded from revenues collected
as a result of a three to five percent franchising fee. Since
residents of both communities are not serviced by cable at this
time, there is no franchising fee available to the Cable Commission
which is the main source of revenue. Group W will advance to
the Cable Communications Commission future franchising fees
to allow for their operations before cable connections are made.
In order to receive an advance on the franchise fees from Group
W, both the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan must approve a transfer
to the Cable Commission, the Cable Commission will then make
a request of Group W and reimburse the two Cities. A formal
request has been received from the Joint Commission that each
City appropriate $20,000 at this time and an immediate request
be made from Group W to advance franchise fees to the Commission
in the amount of $40,000 and as soon as those monies are received,
both the communities will be fully reimbursed byy the Joint Cable
Communications Commission. Enclosed on page /3S is a copy
of this request.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an
appropriation of $20,000 from the City of Eagan to fund the
Burnsville/Eagan Cable Communications Commission with the under-
standing that the City of Eagan will be fully reimbursed as
soon as an advance is received from Group W to the Cable Communica-
tions Commission for future franchise fees.
13 54
•
E
of aagan
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199
BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
MOIiO1
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
JERRY THOMAS
THEODORE WACHTER
CC MO ms
MAY 30, 1984
THOMAS HEDGES
ON Ab "Ia
EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE
Gro Cb k
Tan Hedges
City Administrator
Fagan City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Rd.
Eagan, Mn. 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
The Burnsville/Eagan Cable Communications Cartnission requests an appro-
priation of $20,000.00 from each of the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan
to fund the Commission according to its approved 1984 General Budget.
Franchise Article II, "Grant of Franchise and Acceptance," section 1,
item 2 on p. 7 states: After the initial payment of the acceptance fee,
should costs in excess of the acceptance fee be incurred by City prior
to the payment of the first Franchise fee, City may charge such excess
costs to Grantee and Grantee shall pay then on demand by City, as an advance
on the payment of Franchise fees.
The Cc mLission appreciates your cooperation.
Thank you,
Ann C. Bevis, Cable Adninistrator
cc. Honorable Chair Jim Smith
Treasurer Ron Voracek
Finance Director Gene VanOverbeke
13T
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
is
Page Twenty -Nine
CONTRACT 84-6/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS
C. Contract 84-6, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for
Bids (Sealcoating) -- As a part of the approved 1984 budget,
$60,000 from the general fund was provided for sealcoating to
be matched in a like amount from the major street fund to provide
a total of $120,000 for sealcoating during 1984. The following
subdivisions are proposed to be sealcoated under Contract 84-6:
"Buck Shot"
Duckwood Estates
St. Francis Woods 1st Addition
St. Francis Woods 2nd Addition
Drexel Heights
Cedar Grove 8th Addition
Meadowlands Addition
Hilltop Estates
Evergreen Acres
"Trap Rock"
Thomas Lake Road
Duckwood Drive
Wescott Road (Pilot Knob
to Denmark)
The estimated cost of this sealcoating program is approximately
$118,000. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss
• this year's sealcoating program with the Council at the meeting
on June 5.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify
the plans and specifications for Contract 84-6 (sealcoating)
and, if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening
to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Monday, July 2, 1984.
C�
/3 4
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty
•
CONTRACT 84-14/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS
D. Contract 84-14, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for
Bids (Lexington Place 2nd Addition and Lexington Place South)
-- Under Item A of Public Hearings, the City Council will be
considering the installation of utilities to service the Lexington
Place 2nd Addition and the Lexington Place South Addition.
When the Council received the petition requesting the preparation
of the feasibility report, the developer also requested simultaneous
preparation of detailed plans and specifications while guaranteeing
their cost should the project not be approved by Council action
at the public hearing. That allowed the staff, through the
consultant, to prepare these detailed plans to be presented
to the Council on the same night as the public hearing. Therefore,
if the public hearing for Project 404 is approved, it would
be in order for the Council to consider approving the plans
and specifications and authorizing the advertisement for bids.
Our consulting engineer will be available to discuss in further
detail any question the Council may have. The agreement and
easement has been executed for the installation of the sanitary
sewer across the west property line of Barry and Marge Tilley
to provide the development of this subdivision.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify •
the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-14 and
if approved, authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to
be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 29, 1984.
n
U
/37
Agenda Information Memo
June 5, 1984, City Council Meeting
• Page Thirty -One
CONTRACT 84-15/APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE BIDS
E. Contract 84-15, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for
Bids (Sun Cliff 2nd Addition) -- Earlier on the Council agenda,
the City Council will be considering Prject 398 for the installation
of streets and utilities to service the Sun Cliff 2nd Additions.
At the time that the developer submitted the petition requesting
the preparation of the feasibility report for that public hearing,
they also requested the simultaneous preparation of the detailed
plans and specifications while guaranteeing their cost if the
project should not be approved by the Council at the public
hearing. This allowed the staff, through the consulting engineer,
to prepare the plans to be presented for Council consideration
on the same night as the public hearing. Our consulting engineer
will be available to discuss in detail any questions the Council
may have pertaining to this proposed installation of streets
and utilities under Contract 84-15. Also, under the Consent
Agenda, the Council will be considering the final plat approval
for this subdivision which will provide for all the .necessary
easements and rights-of-way for this project to commence.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify
• detailed plans and specifications for Contract 84-15 (Sun Cliff
2nd Addition - streets and utilities) and if approved, authorize
the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m.
on Monday, July 2, 1984.
•
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
• FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 1, 1984
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
Metropolitan Council Chairperson Appointment
Mayor Blomquist and the City Administrator have attended two
meetings recently where the new Metropolitan Council Chairperson,
Sandra Gardebring, was the guest speaker. Those meetings were
the Municipal Legislative Commission meeting held Wednesday,
May 23, in Plymouth, and the Association of Metropolitan Municipali-
ties Banquet held in Brooklyn Park on the evening of Wednesday,
May 30. Mayor Blomquist made notes of Ms. Gardebring's speech
at the AMM banquet outlining specifically her objectives as
the new Metropolitan Council Chairperson. Those objectives
are as follows:
1) The Governor's objective to study and possible fund a light
rail transit (LRT) somewhere in the metropolitan area.
The new chairperson has indicated that this study will
be a priority item for the Metropolitan Council.
• 2) The creation of a rapid transit board (RTB) which will
act as a managing arm of the mass transit commission is
also a strong objective of the Metropolitan Council. Because
of opt -out and other related legislation that affect a
centralized busing effort, it is becoming necessary to
create a long range planning arm of the mass transit commission
allowing the RTB to involve itself with planning and overall
objectives of a mass transit operation and keep the MTC
as a operating arm for bus service. Ms. Gardebring is
asking for cities to volunteer persons for appointments
to the RTB.
3) Solid waste landfill abatement is another priority.
4) The combined sewer overflow (CSO) which mainly affects
the two core cities is another priority and concern of
the Metropolitan Council. This item would be very expensive
and must be carefully weighed.
5) Regional channels for cable television is another effort
and priority that the Metropolitan Council will be considering.
Two other items of interest and seem to be a priority of the
new chairperson are long-term housing efforts for the elderly
and other social programs for the elderly since the population
• shift has rapidly increased the percentage of elderly in the
metropolitan area. Her main summary statement at both presentations
/3 y
Informative Memo •
June 1, 1984
Page Two
was the Metropolitan Council will "act as a planning and coordinat-
ing body". These statements were emphasized and seemed to be
well received by all municipalities.
League of Minnesota Cities Presidency
Each year a member of the Board of Directors of the League of
Minnesota Cities is selected to be president and another member
as vice-president. The vice-president normally moves into the
presidency the following year. This year Iry Anderson, of Interna-
tional Falls, is president, while Adrian Herps, a city councilmember
in Bloomington, is vice-president. Mr. Herps has decided, for
business reasons, not to pursue the presidency next year. Since
the presidency is rotated between metro and out state, it would
be appropriate to select someone on the Board of Directors from
the metropolitan area to be nominated for the League presidency.
Mary Anderson, the Mayor of Golden Valley and former chairperson
of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, is seeking
the presidency and has received significant support from suburban
communities. Mayor Blomquist is suggesting that the City of
Eagan support Mary Anderson for the presidency. She is very
sympathetic to local government aids and many of the issues •
that are confronting the City of Eagan as well as other suburban
communities. More than likely, she will not be opposed and
if she is, it would probably be generated from a League Board
member in one of the two core cities.
Final Cost Analysis of the Minnesota Jockey Club
For a Class A Horse Racing Facility
The City Administrator has concluded the final processing of
all bills involving the Minnesota Jockey Club's application
that was processed by the City of Eagan for a Class A horse
racing facility. All the bills were reviewed and a letter drafted
to Steve Pflaum with copies of those bills attached to finalize
a reimbursement for all expenses incurred by the City of Eagan.
As an informative item, the City Administrator has prepared
a brief memorandum to the City Council outlining the final cost
analysis. A copy is enclosed on page _LSL� Any member of
the City Council would like more detail on any of these costs,
copies of the bills and more detailed information as prepared
by the City Administrator can be made available.
use of Dakota County Western Court Facility as Precinct Polling
Place
The Finance Director/City Clerk has received some resistance
from the judges regarding the use of the Western Court Facility •
located on Cliff Road as a precinct polling place. The City
Administrator has sent a letter to the County Administrator
• Informative Memo
June 1, 1984
Page 3
copies enclosed for your reference on page /1/-6 , and also
has met with staff members of Dakota County to review the issue.
Because of the autonomy of the judges, it is very difficult
for the County Board to intervene and require that the judges
make the facility available. The City Administrator will be
visiting with Judge Hoey to explain how the voting will impact
their operations and is hopeful that this matter can be worked
out by June 13, which is the deadline for any change in precincts
as required by the Secretary of State's office. If any member
of the City Council has contact with any of the judges and would
promote the need and use of one of the courtrooms for polling
location, it would be most helpful.
Yankee Square Inn
A letter was received from Yankee Square Inn regarding a provision
that the City of Eagan in time of a disaster can use their airport
shuttle bus. A copy of this letter is enclosed on page
MASAC
• Enclosed on pages / ?' through / ,!rO are copies of minutes
of the last MASAC meeting held on April 24.
Minnesota Symphony Orchestra
Enclosed on page /6'1 is official notification that the Minnesota
Symphony Orchestra will be performing at the Minnesota Zoo on
Saturday, July 14.
Roadside Fruit Stands and Sale Stand
At the request of the City Council, the City Attorney has prepared
a memorandum regarding roadside fruit stands and sale stands.
A copy is enclosed on pages /$Y through /53
Tires Plus Standard
The City has sent a letter to the owner of Tires Plus Standard
siting their violations on two different occasions. The second
letter,- which was sent from the Chief Building Official, is
enclosed on page /$11- for your review.
Fire Department Monthly Reports
Enclosed on pages /6S through 164 are monthly reports
for the volunteer Fire Department which represent January and
February, 1984.
• Rodney Schaumburg
Enclosed is a copy of a letter addressed to the Mayor and Council
from Rodney Schaumburg concerning the Pilot Knob Road improvements
% T�
Informative Memo
June 1, 1984 •
Page 4
and also a response letter from the Director of Public Works
to Mr. Schaumburg regarding that item. These letters are enclosed
on pages /.57 through /19
Footing Inspection at Woodthrush Court
At the recent special City Council meeting, a concern was raised
regarding the footings that were poured at 3664 Woodthrush Court
and a response from the Chief Building Inspector is enclosed
for your review on page /60
Bloomington Platin
A concern was also raised at the same special City Council meeting
regarding a business that was relocated from Bloomington to
Eagan called "Bloomington Plating". Concerns regarding that
building are addressed in a memorandum attached on pages
/G/ through /63
Entitlement Issuer/ID Bonds
Enclosed on pages 1411- through /66 is a copy of a letter
and the certification that was sent to the State of Minnesota
Department of Energy and Economic Development regarding Eagan's •
request to become an entitlement issuer for industrial development
bonds. The City Administrator has contacted the State and learned
that the $26,000,000 issue for the Minnesota Jockey Club horse
racing track will qualify as an issue. This means that the
City of Eagan will be able to utilize three of the top four
years, which are 1980, 1981 and 1983, and the average entitlement
of each year is in excess of $15,000,000. This means that Eagan
could have available some $15,000,000 of industrial revenue
bonds to issue for industrial expansion. Most suburban communities,
with the possible exception of Bloomington, are looking at an
average of about $2-$3,000,000. The issuance of these bonds,
though never used by the Minnesota Jockey Club, could be a real
bonanza for the City in the next couple of years.
Can -American Conditions
At the last regular City Council meeting a request was made
to provide a copy of all the conditions that were approved for
the Can -American project. Those conditions are listed as a
part of the May 15 City Council meeting minutes.
Policy For Rescue Squad Calls
City. Councilmember Thomas has received inquiries from members
of the volunteer Fire Department regarding the new policy that
was implementea by the Fire and Police Departments- for 'rescue •
squad calls. A meeting was held on May 7 between City Council -
member Thomas, Chief of Police Berthe, Fire Chief Childers and
Informative Memo
• June 1, 1984
Page 5
the City Administrator to discuss those concerns. A memorandum
was prepared by the City Administrator, a copy is enclosed on
pages 147 through /6of" outlining the concerns that were
discussed at that meeting. As a result, the two Chiefs were
asked to address those questions and issues and a follow-up
meeting was held on Tuesday, May 22, at which time the issues
were further discussed and a consensus reached that the new
policy would continue for one (1) year as an experiment and
be evaluated again at that time.
City Administrator
•
E
/d i
E
•
1]
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: MAY 31, 1984
SUBJECT: FINAL COST ANALYSIS OF THE MINNESOTA JOCKEY CLUB'S
APPLICATION FOR A CLASS A HORSE RACING FACILITY
The City of Eagan incurred a number of expenses while processing
the Class A horse racing facility application that was presented
by the Minnesota Jockey Club. For a general review of those
expenses, the following analysis is provided:
During 1983, there were engineering expenses incurred totalling
$828.50 paid to the Firm of Bonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik,
an appraisal fee in the amount of $800.00 for J.E. Parranto
Associates, Inc., and legal services to Dave Kennedy in the
amount of $2,174.50. There were also legal services paid
to Paul Hauge in the amount of $2,230.92 and a reimbursement
of City staff time and miscellaneous costs, primarily hours
recorded by the City Administrator totalling $5,172.87.
Therefore, the total cost reimbursement to the City of Eagan
was $11,206.79 for 1983.
The costs incurred during 1984 totalled $18,446.46. The
cost breakdown for 1984 is as follows:
1. Legal services for Paul Hauge in the amount of $1,331.08.
2. Evensen-Dodge, Inc., for services rendered in the review
of the tax increment financing issue in the amount of
$12,448.75 and for time allocated and recorded by the
City Administrator in the amount of $4,193.75. Therefore,
the total expenses incurred by the City and requisitioned
for reimbursement by the Minnesota Jockey Club is $17,973.58.
3. Engineering services provided by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik
.8 Associates amounted to $472.88. (Previously invoiced
and paid.)
There were also other expenses incurred by Dave Kennedy and
Steve Rosholt during 1984 that were directly billed to the Minnesota
Jockey Club and, therefore, are not shown as a request for payment
by the City of Eagan.
In summary, the total costs incurred by the City of Eagan for
staff and consulting services was $29,653.25. All other consulting
services and time incurred for the project was a direct obligation
of the Minnesota Jockey Club. The time involvement of other
City staff was `ori in comparison to other development appli-
cations('
\— Y.,.11A
City Administrator
TLH/jj
cc: Gene Van Overbeke, Director of Finance/City Clerk
/11C
OF
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. RO. BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454.8100
MAY 17, 1984
MR FRED JOY
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
DAKOTA COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1560 HIGHWAY 55
HASTINGS MN 55033
Dear Fred:
BEA BLOMOUIST
Mow
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
JERRY THOMAS
THEODORE WACHTER
0aax+,non�3
THOMAS HEDGES
ON Aa Rota
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
ON 0&1
The City of Eagan, through City Clerk Gene VanOverbeke, has made
- some informal inquiries concerning the use of the Dakota County
Western Court -Facility as a precinct polling place for elections
conducted by the City. It is my understanding that Jeff Connell
of your staff reviewed the matter with certain County officials
and responded that it would be best for the City to not use this
facility.
It has been the opinion of City of Eagan officials that the use of
this facility will allow for the most efficient precints within
the City and benefit all concerned parties. It is also the
opinion of City officials that the use of one courtroom two to
three times per year maximum would not necessarily be disruptive
to the normal activities at that location. With advance notice,
scheduling should not be a problem.
Therefore, please consider this letter to be the City's formal
request for use of this facility as provided by M.S.A. 204B.16,
Subd. 6, which clearly says that any statutory city, county,
school district, etc., shall make their facilities, including
parking, available for the holding of city, county, state and
federal elections.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We will be happy
to provide whatever additional information you desire relative to
this request. The City Council is expected to formalize precinct
boundaries at its June 5, 1984, meeting and we would very much
appreciate a response from your office prior to that time.
S,
rely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
TLH/jj
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
i 11-5
0
YANKEE SQUARE INN
3450 Washington Drive • Eagan. Minnesota 55122 • (012) 452-0100
17J
May 17,1984
Honorable Mayor Blomquist
Members of City Council
City of Eagan
P.D. Box 21-199
Eagan Minnesota 55122
Gentlemen,
The staff and managment of the Yankee Square Inn, .'is pleased to
announce the start of our airport shuttle service. Guests of the
Yankee Square Inn will have access to the Eagan business community
as well. This service is part of our policy to better serve our
Eagan business community, as well as our guests convenience.
We are proud to serve the Eagan community, and feel a strong
obligation to serve the city that serves us. We at the Yankee
Square Inn, would like to offer our shuttle bus to the City of
Eagan in the event of an emergency or disaster. The shuttle
service is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
It is our sincere hope that such a situation never arises,'but
should it become necessary to call on us please don't hesitate
to call. If you have any questions or suggestions, as to our
service please call me.
Si ely,
I
Timothy B. Dunn
General Manager
0
/546
MINUTES
METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL
GENERAL MEETING
7:30 P.M.
April 24, 1984
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Call to Order, Roll Call.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Walter Rockenstein at 7:30 p.m.
The Secretary was asked to call the roll and the following members were in
attendance:
Gary White (A)
Ben Griggs (R)
Robert Johnson (R)
Ron Glaub (R)
Jeff Hamiel (R)
Art Tomes (A)
David Woodrow (R)
John Richter (R)
Walter Rockenstein (R)
Jim Serrin (R),
Roylene Champeaux (R)
Dennis Schulstad (A)
Kris Clinton (A)
Steve Cramer (A)
Scott Bunin (R)
Carl Vangsness (R)
Joyce Maddox (R)
Eugene Bohmert (A)
Lloyd Wickstrom (A)
Martin Kirsch (R)
Donald Priebe (R)
Larry Shaughnessy (R)
Tom Baker (R)
Midway Airlines
Northwest Airlines
Republic Airlines
Minnesota Business Aircraft Association
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce
St. Paul Chamber of Commerce
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of Minneapolis
City of St. Paul
City of St. Paul
City of St. Paul
City of St. Paul
City of St. Paul
City of Richfield
City of Richfield
City of Mendota Heights
City of Eagan
147
•
•
MASAC Minutes
Advisors
• John Aamot
Nancy Witta
Darrell Weslander
Joan Vandersloot
Visitors
Dave Kelso
Captain John Lindstrom
Colonel Jerry Litschke
Captain Dennis Lord
Jim Aswegan
J. K. Nelson
Chauncey Case
-2-
April 24, 1984 1.
Federal Aviation Administration
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Technical Advisor
Secretary
Minnesota Pollution
Delta Air Lines
Army National Guard
Army National Guard
MN DOT
Bloomington
Metropolitan Council
2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting of March 27, 1984•
Control Agency
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections to the minutes of
March 27, 1984. There being none, the minutes were approved as presented.
3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications.
• Darrell Weslander presented copies of the articles to be placed in two (2) editions
of the Highland Villager and the West Side -West St. Paul Voice regarding the
temporary -relocation of the Army National Guard helicopter unit from St'. Paul
Downtown Airport to Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport.
Chairman Rockenstein introduced Captain John Lindstrom, Chief Pilot, from Delta
Air Lines. Captain Lindstrom expressed his personal delight at introducing
service to Minneapolis/St. Paul. Delta will fly six (6) trips per day; three
(3) from Atlanta and three (3) from Chicago on B727 -equipment. He assured the
council that Delta's fleet meets all current noise abatement standards.
4. Technical Advisor's Preferential
ilization Reoort and Complaint
The reports for the month of March were presented by Darrell Weslander.
John Richter asked Jeff Hamiel about projected operations for the next five (5)
years. Jeff Hamiel stated that MAC Chairman, Ray Glumack, would like to address
MASAC at a future meeting to elaborate on this and related issues.
Larry Shaughnessy questioned the take -off methods on runways I1L and 11R.
John Aamot of the FAA explained the departure procedure, the separation require-
ments involved and the reasons discrepancies may occur.
•5• Persons Wishing to Address the Council.
There were none.
/a
Y
MASAC Minutes -3- April 24, 1984
0
VA
I
E
Presentation
Army National Guard Personnel.
Colonel Jerry Litschke presented a brief summary regarding the temporary use of •
the facilities at Wold Chamberlain by the Army National Guard helicopter unit. He
explained that no training would be conducted at MSP, and that the river corridor
route had been coordinated with the tower. The expected date of return to St. Paul
is sometime in November or December of this year.
Report of Legislative Committee.
Larry Shaughnessy reported on the April 12 meeting of the Legislative Committee,
and presented Resolution 84-3 in support of the petition to cease the manufacture
and registration of aircraft which do not meet Stage 3 noise standards after
January 1, 1986.
It was moved by Larry Shaughnessy, seconded by Scott Bunin, that the resolution
be adopted. The motion passed unanimously.
Update: Status of Legislation Regarding Noise Abatement.
House File 1945 and Senate File 1914 regardingairport noise abatement authored
by Representative Wesley Skoglund was discussed by Jeff Hamiel. While in the
Senate, language of the bill was changed; however, Representative Skoglund has
thus far not introduced it to the House. It is uncertain whether it will be
voted upon during this legislative session.
Summary of MAC Staff Meeting with Concerned Citizens in Burnsville.
Darrell Weslander briefly described the meeting he and Jeff Hami8l had in
Burnsville on April 11 regarding the experimental use of the 180 turn after
departure on runway 22, and its affect on the area residents.
•
Also mentioned was Burnsville's interest in MASAC and its desire to be represented.
Report of MASAC Representative to MAC Meeting of April 16, 1984,
The summary of the Commission meeting of April 16 was presented by Jeff Hamiel.
Items of interest were as follows:
- the approval of the lease to Burlington Northern to relocate the
Western hangar to the new cargo area adjacent to Republic,
- House Bill 1945 (as discussed in item 8. of these minutes),
- REIL lights at Anoka/Blaine,
- ILS at Airlake, and
- the EIS petition regarding Anoka/Blaine as a minor role airport.
Other Items Not on the Agenda. •
Darrell Weslander explained an upcoming sample study utilizing handicapped
individuals to count aircraft operations on the various runways.
/SW
MASAC Minutes -4- April 24, 1984
12. Establish Next Meeting Date.
• The next meeting date was established as May 22, 1984, and an invitation to attend
will be extended to Mr. Larry McCabe.
13. Adjournment.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:12 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Joan Vandersloot
MASAC Secretary
\J
•
160
0
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: MAY 18, 1984
RE: FIRST ANNOUNCEMENT
MINNESOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA - MINNESOTA ZOO
For some time now this department, in cooperation with the communities of Lake-
ville and Apple Valley, has been working with the Minnesota Zoo and the Minn-
esota Symphony Orchestra in promoting a "free admission" concert at the Minn-
esota Zoo.
Just recently, we have been able to conclude an agreement and would like to
• make you aware of this first announcement that the Minnesota Orchestra will be
playing at the Minnesota Zoo on Saturday, July 14, in a free concert for
residents south of the Minnesota River.
This promises to be an exciting and awesome adventure and certainly a unique
event for the residents of our communities.
Please mark July 14 on your social calendars as I am sure it will be an event
you will want to participate in. Additional information concerning the activ-
ities to be promoted as well as the involvement of the Council and Commission
will be forthcoming as details are worked out in the next week or two.
KV/js
lel
HAIIGE, SMITH, EIDE & IIELLER, P.A.
• ATTORNEYS AT LAW
CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS
9800 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 00122
PAUL H. 14AUGE
BRADLEY SMITH
KEVIN W. EIDE
DAVID G. KELLER
May 7, 1984
Mr. Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Roadside Fruit Stands and Sales Stand
Dear Tom:
AREA COOK 612
TZ"PHONZ 404.4224
I was asked by Mayor Blomquist to explore some questions relating to
the location and.expansion of fruit stands along public streets and also
questions about vendors of murals, tools, etc., who sell their products
either on public street right-of-way or private property adjacent to right-
of-way.
• 1. Is it permissible for a fruit and vegetable stand that has been located
on private property adjacent to a public street to continue to operate and
can it expand its operation without a City permit?
•
Under Eagan City Code Section 11.10, Subd. 3, the continued use, expansion or
rebuilding of any use existing upon the date of adoption of the City Code
is allowable. However, this is not interpreted to permit an initial develop-
ment in accordance with any repealed ordinance. The expansion or rebuilding
relates only to existing buildings or uses and also the expansion cannot be
so large as to constitute an initial development.
Eagan Ordinance Section 11.10, Subd. 3(C) requires a permit for expansion of
a nonconforming use but it's only applicable if the use was not preexisting
or grandfathered. It would have to be determined whether the fruit and vegetable
stand was in existence prior to adoption of the ordinance dealing with non-
conforming uses and if not it could not expand without acquiring a -nonconforming
use permit.
If a vendor is within the public right-of-way or is on public land he or she
must have a permit and follow the terms of the permit.
/5v
Mr. Hedges •
May 7, 1984
Page -Two
Another area that can be looked at in relation to these kinds of stands
is whether there is any public nuisance created such as excessive traffic,
safety problems, etc. This .may be grounds for controlling such stands even
though they may have been in existence for a long period of time.
2. Can vendors sell murals, tools, etc. without a license or permit on private
property or public street right-of-way?
Eagan City Code does not prohibit these sales under its solicitations section.
See Section The sale of products on residential property may
be violative of the Zoning Ordinance which requires it to be residential. If
a vendor offers to sell property within street righ-of-way, he or she would be
violating Eagan Ordinance 7.05, Subd. 1, which states as follows:
"It is a misdemeanor for any person to place, deposit, display or
offer for sale, any fence, goods, or other obstructions upon, over,
across, or under any street without first having obtained a written
permit from the Council, and then only in compliance in all respects
with all terms and conditions of such permit, and taking precautionary
measures for the protection of the public."
In addition, zoning provision Section 11.10, Subd. 9, forbids structures in •
public rights-of-way. It states:
"No building, structures, or uses may be located in or on any public
lands or right-of-way without approval of the Council."
Uses could be interpreted to include sales of goods.
It appears that if a vendor is within the public right of way or is on public
lands, he or she must have a permit and-mugt follow the terms of such permit.
skk
Very
PhelP H. Hauge V
City Attorney - City of Eagan
15,3
•
W a
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO, BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 0.54-8100
May 11, 1984
MR TOM GEGAX
T.H.A. MARKETING CONCEPTS
3760 WAYZATA BLVD
GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55416
RE: CITY OF EAGAN
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TIRES PLUS STANDARD
Dear Mr. Gegax:
BEA SLOM9UIST
�Aca
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
'ERRY THOMAS
THEODORE V.ACHIER
=a+�cr eromoa+�
-OMAS HEDGES
C:ro Arse zrwc
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
Please be advised' that it has been brought -to the attention of the
City that you have remodeled the Tires Plus Standard Service Station
without the appropriate building permit. The Building Inspection
Department has penalized you with the appropriate fee for failure to
obtain the permit prior to commencement of construction.
It has also been brought to our attention that during the remodeling
process you eliminated one of your restroom facilities, leaving only
one facility in the structure. It would appear that this is a
violation of the Uniform Building Code requiring two (2) such
facilities where an employer employs more than. four (4) people and
includes employees of both sex. The UBC by reference is a portion of
the Eagan City Code. Therefore, you are in violation of the City
Code.
It is the City's position that the Conditional Use Permit is
implicitly conditioned upon remaining in compliance with the
existing code. Therefore, you are required to correct the violation
prior to renewal of your Conditional Use Permit or accept the
possibility of non -renewal by the City Council.
Sincerely,
Dale--Pe`tefrson
Chief Building Official
CC: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator
Dale Runkle, City Planner
Parcel File
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
FOR MONTH OF January 1984
WORK PERFORMED •
TYPE MAN HOURS
Fire/Rescue 720
Training 484
Truck 6 Equipment Maintenance 131
Station Maintenance 143
Fire Prevention 25
Administrative 253
TOTAL 1756
MANPOWER STATION U1 STATION 02 STATION 03
Available Days 12 5 6
Available Nights 12 "jam— �—
Available Rotating 2 4 �"—
On Leave 1 —T—
TOTAL 27 23 16
FIRE/RESCUE •
. TYPE NUMBER $ LOSS
Structure 12 $10,000
Grass 0
Vehicle 4 1,700
False 3
Medical _ 5
Other 1.
TOTAL 28 $11,700
LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES
DATE NAME
LOCATION
OCCUPANCY
$ LOSS
1-9-84
Cedarvale Parking Lot
Car.
$ 700
1-9-84
4279 Lodgepole
Car
1,000
1-4-84
4158 Rahn Rd 015
Apartment
1,000
1-1-84
2030 Emerald
House
6,000
Revised 1-1-83
/5S
•
•
EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
FOR MONTH OF February 1984
WORK PERFORMED
$ LOSS
TYPE
MAN HOURS
Fire/Rescue
740
Training
342
Truck & Equipment Maintenance
131
Station Maintenance
129
Fire Prevention
42
Administrative
375
TOTAL
1759
MANPOWER
Available Days
Available Nights
Available Rotating
On Leave
TOTAL
• FIRE/RESCUE
TYPE
Structure
Grass
Vehicle
False
Medical
Other
TOTAL
LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES
DATE NAME
2-7-84
2-18-84
•
STATION 91
12
12
2
1
27
NUMBER
12
0
2
•4
2
1
21
LOCATION
3890 Lexington
4591 Greenleaf Dr.,
/S6
STATION 02 STATION 03
5 6
13 �^
4 — 1
23 16
$ LOSS
$7,400
$7,400
OCCUPANCY
$ LOSS
House
$6,000
House
2,000
Revised 1-1-83
May 24, 1984
/O-0/000- 030
MUNICIPAL OFFICES
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Fagan, Minnesota 55122
Attention: Mayor Bea Blomquist and Fagan City Councilmen
Dear Mayor Blomquist:
I attended a City Council Meeting on or around July 5, 1983, regarding
assessment on the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road (County laud #31). I
complained to the City for not obtaining an easement for upgrading the
road, storm sewers, etc. I was told to submit a letter within ten (10)
days of my complaints, which I did. Not receiving any response to my
letter I called City Hall around the 1st of the year. After several phone
calls I received some response from the City that there would be an adjust-
ment on the storm sewer and nothing more on the other complaints. I was
then advised the easement for the road was a County problem. I talked to
Dakota County and they said it was a City of Eagan responsibility to obtain
an easement.
In the past I have written the City with no response, leaving me with the
feeling these matters are riot being properly reviewed. I am requesting a
letter from the City of Fagan within thirty (30) days as to why they can
trespass on private property and upgrade a road without obtaining an ease- •
ment. Also,'I never received an itemized assessment statement from the
City on the upgrading of Pilot Knob.
I would appreciate your attention in this matter as soon as possible.
RLS/blw
cc: Mr. Fred Joy
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
1560 West Highway 55
Hastings, Minnesota 55033
Sincerely,
4-
L. Schaumburg
3160 Pilot Knob Rcad
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
/S%
•
of ecag a
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 0.54$100
May 30, 1984
Mr. Rodney L. Schaumburg
3160 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
RE: PARCEL #10-01000-030-32
PROJECT #200, PILOT KNOB ROAD UPGRADING
Dear Mr. Schaumburg:
f7/
BEA BLOMTDUIST
Mp
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
JERRY THOMAS
THEODORE WACHTER
Cw ,MB ,
THOMAS HEDGES
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
Gro coy
Your registered letter to the Mayor and City Council dated May 24th
has been forwarded to my attention for review and response. In
your letter, you indicate that you have contacted the City but have
never received a response leaving you with the feeling that matters
are not being properly reviewed. Maybe the documentation in this
letter, to your attention, will again remind you of the review per-
formed by the City and the action taken or decisions made in regards
to your complaints. In your most recent letter, you indicate that
you have not received an itemized assessment statement from the
City for the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. Enclosed please find
two copies of the "Statement of Special Assessment" for Project
#177 which dealt with the installation of storm sewer and Project
#200 which related directly to the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road and
of surfacing. These statements were sent out to all property owners
who were assessed under these projects informing them of the amount
of the assessment.
As you will note, it delineates a pay schedule with interest rates
and deadlines, etc. In addition, you will note that subsequent
to your complaint submitted at the assessment hearing of July 5,
1983, that the amount of the assessment levied on your property's
tax statement, due and payable in 1984, did not contain the $495.00
for the storm sewer laterial assessment. This was a direct result
of an investigation of your complaint and a determination made that
your property did not receive the benefit which was originally pro-
posed to be levied at the assessment hearing on July 5, 1983.
You also indicate that you talked with "Dakota County" regarding
the easement problem and you were informed that it was the City
of Eagan's responsibility to obtain the easement. It is difficult
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
/S9,
RODNEY L. SCHAUMBURG
MAY 30, 1984
PAGE 2
to believe that the County would inform you that it was the City's
responsibility to obtain the easements when it was their legal de-
partment who acquired all easements necessary to initiate County
Contract 31-05 (Pilot Knob Road). The City had to reimburse the
County a certain portion for the right-of-way acquisition costs
that were incurred by the County. Therefore, as you can see, it
was the full County responsibility to acquire all necessary ease-
ments. As you have been informed in the past by several different
agencies, the County determined that it already had legal right
to the existing 33 foot half right-of-way which you do not agree
with. Whether you agree with it or not, it has been determined
by the County Attorney's Office that that property was in fact
County right-of-way and no additional acquisition was necessary.
As you can see, there has been considerable response to your
numerous and continuous complaints to both the County and the City
regarding this project. It appears the problem is not in receiving
a response from the City or the County; but rather, receiving the
response that you want to hear.
•
Therefore, I feel that the City and County have properly responded
to your concerns and in the City's instance has taken appropriate
corrective action where necessary. Unless any new concerns are
brought forth that have not been previously discussed, I will con- •
sider the information contained in this letter to be the final
response from the City of Eagan.
Sincerely,
Thomas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
TAC:jbd
Enclosure
cc: The Mayor and City_Council
-c/o Thomas V. -Hedges, City Administrator,.-
•
/59
0
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
DATE: MAY 30, 1984
RE: FOOTINGS AT 3664 WOODTHRUSH CT
On a footing inspection, the inspector only sees the form
work and soil conditions. The form work shows the inspector
the building setbacks and building elevations.
The foundation inspection shows the inspector if the foot-
ing/foundation assembly is compatible. On this foundation
inspection, it was found that the bearing wall assemblies
were good, but the partition curb block • areas of the
• stairwell were out of place and they will be repaired when
the basement floor is poured. The structuralintegrity will
not be compromised at all.
DP/js
CC: Parcel File
140
C:
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
DATE: MAY 30, 1984
RE: RICK BODEKER D/B/A BLOOMINGTON PLATING
L 15, B 2, EAGANDALE #4
3330 MIKE COLLINS DR
The above referenced company moved into the referred building
sometime in March. We were unaware of their arrival, or the
nature of their business until we were in receipt of their
industrial sewer connection application on April 30 as indic-
ated on the copy of the enclosed application which we for-
warded at that time to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commis-
sion. Their permit #0178 was assessed 30 SAC units by the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Gould Battery and E&Q
Fabricators were the original tenants and they accounted for •
five (5) of the SAC units. They were deducted from the 30
that were assessed.
I have referred the use of the parcel for review to City
Planner, Dale Runkle, and the possibility of the sanitary
discharge being detrimental to the City Sewer System to
Public Works Director, Tom Colbert.
If you need further information, please contact me and I will
attempt to gather it for you.
DP/js
Encl.
CC: Tom Colbert, Public Works Director
Dale Runkle, City Planner
Parcel File
•
0
E. INDUSTRIAL: SEWER CONNECTION APPLICATION
Company name t. L) rh
33k 1) Mob �: I,,"1-7 ;' /v 225x3
Location seeress - -
Mailing address
Company Representative
Title JC, -x'. /, .
Phone number ry 7 - CfZ Iq
1. Nature of business'�rt�a'I'1= ^�"`( l:' 1': i4r ` ("
MWCC-7361
(Sn ❑ New building
2. Projected date for facility start up 1.1 Gr'I 1_ `I
3. Total facility area / ? G I~ c sp. ft.
4. No. of employees
5. Operating hours per day
fix Operating days per year
\❑/Building addition
® Existing building
7. Water supply. D
a. Municipal water supply L LCy gal/day
b. Well water supply gal/day
c. Other (specify) gal/day
d. Total water supply �000 gal/day
8. Waste discharge:
a. Sanitary waste discharge 120 gal/day
b. Uncontaminated cooling water discharge gal/day
1.) .... to sanitary sewer sal/day .
2.) .... to storm sewer sal/day ylJ, /�
c. Industrial waste discharge r • r cgal/day
d. Total discharge to sanitarysewer (Sa+gbl+gc) 1 i1y0c gal/day
9. SAC units: Total discharge (l30)
274 - 00 SAC Units /. 0- •�- 1 6
10. SAC Charge:1 DO 000 00 J�r1Q
SAC Units (9) 30 X Unit s J~00
Charge rya=,2 s0I4 S
SAC Charge
� 7t"
11. Pretreatment: [Refer to Sections 5-5 and 5-6 of the Waste Control Rules andRegulations.) Does the Company plan any in -plant
treatment of wastes? !ECL L[(`EA yes. describe 2015! 315' A �'(',TC_)A TPG Ric,inr (I�t T-t[ft.ivle
12. Sampling 6 Flow Measuring: [Refer to Section 5.9 of the
• Waste Control Rules and Regulations.] Indicate location of sewer
access
Ani i alAP�
point and describe flowmeter and means of sampling fT
'MTSt, ff)-ti
F),r) )
{z(, Ru `rcbT P,.j T -L P.uA'IC H MicTriof) SANIP►,Ir1�
�_i�OL)QI.�( G.PFl3 �ArIF1''S T!`•f=W61•t^�T ilii lti1CPCIsJC, �Y;
Ile I.
13. Discharge Quality.
3,0 elk i/4 -
C..30 m(DI-
0,0e ^GI&.
/IZMI./L
Resent Absent
(Check appropriate tax)
Constlhum
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
.........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
I.........
....................
..........
V
..........Solids
.......... Organics
.......... Acids
.......... Caustics
.......... Temperature (greater than 150'F)
.......... Cadmium
.......... Chromium
......... Copper
.......... Cyanide
..........Iron
..........Lead
.......... Mercury
.......... Nickel
......... Zinc
.......... Phenols
Grease and/or oil
.......... Solvents
Radioactive wastes
✓
V
]
P..........
-
MWCC-7717 '
14. Additional Information. sketches or descriptions may be attached for the purpose of adequately describing the waste discharge.
!!{{�'�� C CATION
This is to certify that Ba oc; f yi �i� t^S� N 1 a agrees to comply with the rules
(Co -mw Nuna)
and regulations governing connection to and use of the Metropolitan Disposal System. including obtaining an Indus.
trial discharge permit prior to th
Compan�Signature of of ficial)
Date
2) Trai
3)
Approved by Metro Titan W s Control Com ission W 4zr-, % % ii�,
Signature
Title
��foY
Date��S/s-f do
1`
d► -7g
/,.3
K,)ierJ
s/3/H
•
�,ut •
5�31$0-
OF
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
May 22, 1989
MR RICHARD NADEAU
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION
MN DEPT OF ENERGY 8 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
150 E KELLOGG BLVD
ROOM 900
ST PAUL MN 55101
Re: Certification For Entitlement Is
Bonds City of Eagan Minnesota
Dear Mr. Nadeau:
of Industrial
BEA SLON01=1
MOM
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
JERRY THOMAS
THEODORE WACHTER
Ca l Ma.nncs
THOMAS HEDGES
01y A�ftclo
EUGENE VAN OVERSEKE
G4 Cy
Enclosed is the City of Eagan's Certification to become an entitle-
ment issuer of industrial development bonds in the State of
Minnesota. The City of Eagan has chosen the program to become
an entitlement issuer which is one alternative available under
the allocation process adopted this year by the Minnesota Legisla-
ture.
The attached list of issues represent the bond transactions
that were either publicly sold or privately placed. There are
many other industrial development bond applications that received
public hearings before the City Council and either have preliminary
or final approval by the City of Eagan, however, official bonds
were never issued. Those applications are not represented as
a part of Certification and "the City of Eagan believes this
is consistent with the intent of the Legislature. If other
communities are including issues that are pending that were
never officially issued, then the City of Eagan should be allowed
to add those applications to its list for purposes of determining
the entitlement amount.
Thank you for your consideration
regarding the Certification by
to contact this office at any time.
and if there are any questions
the City of Eagan, feel free
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
TLH/jj
cc: Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance; Paul Hauge, City Attorney
THE LONE OAT( TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Ernie Clark, Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
CERTIFICATION •
Pursuant to Minn. Laws 1984, ch. 582 15 to be codified as Minn.
Stat. 474.18, subd. 2, the undersigned certify that City of
(name of local issuer as de intd by Minn.
Ea
5� (hereinafter the
Laws 194 ch. 5H 3 tai' o becoo ified as Minn. Stat. 474.16, subd. 2)
local issuer) issued obligations of a type subject to limitation
under the terms Section 721 of the Tax Reform Bill of 1984, H.R.
4170, as reported by the Ways and Means Committee of the United States
House of Representatives on March 5, 1984 (hereinafter "obligations")
listed herein for each of the four preceeding calendar years.
For each of the four preceeding calendar years list the total
principal amount of obligations issued by any issuer within the geogra-
phic boundaries covered by the local issuer. (For example, bonds
issued by port authorities or redevelopment authorities operating
within the geographic boundaries of the local issuer should be included
in these totals)
1980 $11,678,000 •
1981 1,350,000
1982 1,250,000
1983 34,336,000
For each obligation issued by the local issuer, each of the
four preceeding calendar years, list the following information:
Description of
Total Local Issuer Project with
Date of Principal if other than Respect to which
Issuance of Amount of Local Issuer the Obligation
1980 Obligation Obligation Listed above was issued
1981
1982 See Attached
1983
(Attach additional pages if necessary)
The following authorized official is designated for contact
by the Department of Energy and Economic Development:
Name Thomas L Hedges
Address 3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
May 21, 1984
nate
yOr
May 21, 1984
Data
A nay or Loca ssuer
•
3/24/83
$3,325,000
9/17/83
111001000
10/1/83
1,815,000
None
Unitog Rental Services -
Rental laundry facility
None
Greaser Inc., - Office and
Total
Local Issuer
Theodore A. Davies - Office
Date of
Principal
if other than
Description of Project With
Issuance of
Amount of
Local Issuer
Respect to which the
Obligation
Obligation
Listed Above
Obligation was Issued
5/9/80
$2,130,000
None
Rosemount, Inc. - Office
'
and manufacturing facility
7/15/80
848,000
None
Elliott Auto Supply Co. -
O£fice and warehouse facility
8/1/80
700,000
None
DCR Company - Bowling alley
expansion
12/19/80
5,500,000
None
Economics Laboratory - Addn.
to research and development
facility
12/30/80
2,500,000
None
Carson Pirie Scott Co. -
1980 Subtotal
$11,678,000
Warehouse and showroom
3/5/81
$950,000
None
Yankee Square Office I -
Office Building
- 9/28/81
400,000
None
John Henry Foster Co. -
1981 Subtotal
$1,350,000
Office and warehouse facility
8/25/82
$1,250,000
None
Yankee Square Office III
- Office Building
•'��'' 1982 Subtotal
$1,250,000
3/24/83
$3,325,000
9/17/83
111001000
10/1/83
1,815,000
12/14/83
1,391,000
12/30/83
705,000
12/30/83
20,000,000
12/30/83 6,000,000
1983 Subtotal 34,336,000
Grand Total $48,614,000
None
Yankee Square Inn - Hotel
None
Hillcrest Development -
Office building
None
Unitog Rental Services -
Rental laundry facility
None
Greaser Inc., - Office and
warehouse facility
None
Theodore A. Davies - Office
and warehouse facility
None
Minnesota Jockey Club -
Horse racing track and re-
lated facilities
None
Minnesota Jockey Club -
Horse racing track and
related facilities
4.6
MEMO TO: CITY COUNCILMEMBER JERRY THOMAS, CHIEF OF POLICE JAY
BERTHE, FIRE CHIEF BOB CHILDERS •
FROM: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: MAY 7, 1984
SUBJECT: MEETING TO DISCUSS NEW POLICY FOR RESCUE SQUAD CALLS
A meeting was held on Monday, May 7, 1984, at Perkins Restaurant
to discuss a new procedure that was initiated by the Police
and Fire Departments regarding the type of calls that the Fire
Department's rescue squad is called by the Police Department.
Until December 31, 1983, the rescue squad would be called on
most all accidents and medicals totalling some 350 during 1983.
A study was made by Administration in both Departments and it
was determined that many of the calls that were responded to
by the rescue squad the Police were able to handle on a first
response. It was determined by the Administration in both Depart-
ments that the rescue squad response was not necessary and therefore
would be limited to those emergencies where the dispatcher and/or
police officer decide the rescue squad is necessary.
City Councilmember Thomas, who asked for the meeting with City,
Police and Fire Administration, stated that volunteers from
the Fire Department are concerned that both medicals and accidents
have occurred since January of 1984 when the rescue squad was •
not called and more than likely should have been called by the
police dispatchers. Councilmember Thomas provided several instances
which included the following:
1. A January accident at T.H.13 and Cedar where cars were
flipped due to an accident and victims were in need of
backboards. There was no rescue squad called.
2. An accident in the general vicinity of Wescott and Pilot
Knob in approximately February or March and there was no
rescue called.
3. A concern was expressed regarding an infant who stopped
breathing as to why three squads were taken off the street
to respond to that problem when possibly one squad could
have adequately handled the emergency.
Other examples were cited and City Councilmember Thomas further
explained that the rescue squad had provided a quick response
in the past, has provided good public relations throughout the
community and given people a security that an emergency team
is available to help police assist in a first response to a
medical or accident. He further expressed concern about a liability
to the City if the rescue squad is not called when they could
have been available for an accident or medical.
Both Chief Berthe and Chief Childers stated that they, would •
review the specific instances that were raised by City Councilmember
Thomas as well as in detail the new procedure. Chief Childers
• MEMO
MAY 7, 1984
PAGE 2
stated that to date after four months in 1984 the rescue squad
has been called nine times. The City Administrator asked that
the Fire Department review the 350 calls last year to determine
how many of those calls could have been eliminated in comparison
to the policy that is in effect in 1984. Fire Chief Childers
stated that he is concerned about having enough volunteer fire-
fighters to man all three stations and if the same personnel
are called out on 300-400 rescue calls, this could jeopardize
the availability of manpower for operating all three stations.
He also expressed a concern that the firefighters do not have
enough emergency services training .if the rescue squad is going
to be properly manned and respond to more calls. Fire Chief
Childers also expressed a concern about adding more volunteers
to the Department, especially station number one. He explained
that this station has had a dramatic change in available volunteers
due to a recent retirement of several firefighters.
Both Police Chief Berthe and Fire Chief Childers stated that
they would review in detail the procedure and provide some addition-
al information on how this procedure is working in relationship
to the concerns that were raised by City Councilmember Thomas
and also specifically address the various incidents that were
reported by City Councilmember Thomas. It was suggested by
the City Administrator that a follow-up meeting be held to review
the findings of both Chief Berthe and Chief Childers.
(-\ \ " , '�' L
,')
City Administratou►
TLH/jj U
0
/691
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 19, 1984
EAGAN CITY HALL
CITY ATTORNEY
1. Odell vs. City of Eagan
2. McCarthy Easements
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the
"Engineering/Special Assessment Divisions"
i
2. Capital Equipment Acquisition
3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins
Addition
l6q
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 18, 1984
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
The following items are to be considered as a part of the Adminis-
trative Agenda:
CITY ATTORNEY
1. ODELL VS. CITY OF EAGAN-
As the City Council recalls the Minnesota Court of Appeals has
overruled the Trial Court in the case of Odell vs. City of Eagan
finding that the City Council did not have a valid basis for
denying the preliminary plat. The appellant court accurately points
out that the denial must be based upon sufficient reasons relative
to the City Ordinance. In the case of the Odell Lots, the only
apparent conflict with the Ordinance was in regard to the garage
which exists within set -back requirements. The Court of Appeals
has found that the garage was a non -conforming structure as distin-
guished from a non -conforming use. In their opinion, the sub-
division ordinance only addressed non -conforming uses unless, the
garage was not a valid basis for denial. Therefore, the City
Attorney is recommending that a resolution from the copies enclosed
on pages 1'7.+ through _1 -7,5 -be considered based on the recent
decision of the Court of Appeals.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To prove or deny the en-
closed resolution.
Expenses were incurred in the amount of $394.20 for the Supreme
Court, Court of Appeals and $1528.51 for witnesses and other
related expenses incurred by the appellants. The total cost for
the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals case was $1922.71. The
Odells' requested that the City consider total payment, however,
through negotiations and a dispute from the City Attorneys office
on payment of those expenses the total amount has been lowered to
$639.20. A motion is in order to consider payment in the amount
of $394.20 to the State of Minnesota for the Supreme Court, Court
of Appeals and to the Odell's in the amount of $245.00 with both
payments totaling $639.20.
/70
Administrative Agenda Information
June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting
Page Two
2. McCarthy Easements
The City Attorney, Director of Public Works and City Administrator
are making efforts to gain a desirable settlements for various
easements that are required for utility work through the McCarthy
property. In an effort to negotiate a reduction of approximately
$20,000 in interest costs, the City Attorney is planning to proceed
with the first day of trial and will report to the City Council
following the City Council tomorrow evening on the final status
of the City as it relates to our negotiations with McCarthy's
attorney. For a review of the easements which were discussed
by City Attorney Hauge with Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmembers
Smith and Wachter on Sunday evening, refer to pages 17 (. through
177 . Apparently, City Councilmember Thomas was unavailable
as is City Councilmember Egan who is on vacation.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
1. Personnel
Continuation of Internsh
ecial Assessment Division"
Within the
As a part of the 1984 budget, an engineering intern was authorized
for up to six months. Since this engineering intern is a civil
engineer and has been assisting with engineering tech work and
special assessments and due to the increased construction and
activity within engineering, it is desirable to continue the
internship for the remainder of 1984. The City Administrator
has discussed the position with the Director of Public Works
and feels the need is justified and is recommending consideration
by the City Council. The City Administrator also asked the Direc
for of Public Works to address the overall personnel needs in
engineering/special assessments, realizing that these needs will
be further addressed at the time of the 1985 budget development.
The Director of Public Works has prepared a memorandum describing
the intern needs at the present time and also the possibility
of more permanent employment in the future. Enclosed on pages
1716 through 1190 is a copy of the memo as prepared by the
Director of Public Works.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider approval or
denial of an internship program in the engineering department
for an additional six (6) months during calendar year 1984.
171
Administrative Agenda Information
June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting
Page Three
2. Capital Equipment Acquisition
As a part of the 1984 budget, a one ton dump truck with plow
and sander and a 32,000 GVW dump truck with plow were given review,
however final consideration was to be given during calendar year
1984 with the sale of equipment certificates. The Director of
Public Works has requested that these two (2) vehicles be purchased
during 1984 as explained in a memorandum enclosed on pages
III through Ig2. .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an
authorization for advertising for bids to consider the purchase
of a four wheel drive one ton dump truck and a 34,000 GVW dump
truck with front wing plow attachments with final approval and
authorization of equipment certificates at the time the bid is
awarded.
Special Note: For additional information on this item, refer
to page 48 of your 1984 budget.
3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters
A license application was received from the Eagan Hockey Boosters
for a combination gambling license to be used as a part of the
July 4 festivities. Enclosed is a copy of a letter from a repre-
sentative of the Eagan Hockey Boosters and the gambling license
application. The organization is requesting a waiver of the
license fee which is $25.00 and the $10,000 bond requirement.
It is the tradition of the City Council that the bond requirement
be waived, however, the license fee be collected to offset any
administrative charges. P.i83 —111-
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a
combination gambling license as requested by the Eagan Hockey
Boosters.
r-7.1,
Administrative Agenda Information
June.19,.1984 City Council Meeting_
Page Four
DIRECTOR OF'PUBLIC WORKS
1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins
Addition
The Robins Addition is located south of I-494 and west of T.H. 149
(old Dodd Road) incorporating east Blue Gentian Road. This prelimi-
nary plat received approval from the Council in November of
1981 and has received two previous extensions which expire on
June 15, 1984. They have requested a third extension to June
15, 1985, due to the fact that they have not yet completed the
technical process associated with trading rights-of-way and
property with MnDOT as a part of the progression of I-494.
It is anticipated that all formal documents and agreements would
be completed within the next 6 - 9 months which would allow
them to proceed with their final plat prior to June of 1985.
Due to the fact that this is the third request for an extension,
the staff would recommend that it be the final extension and
that the developers be so informed.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third
and final extension of the preliminary plat approval for the
Robins Addition with the final expiration date of June 15, 1985.
1-73
RESOLUTION
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
JUNE _, 1984
WHEREAS, an application was submitted by David and Patricia Odell in
August of 1982 for a preliminary plat to split Lot 2, in McCarthy Ridge
Addition into two single family lots exceeding the minimum size requirements
for single family lots; and
WHEREAS, in August and again on October 5, 1982, the Eagan City Council
denied said application; and
WHEREAS, the applicants, David and Patricia Odell, appealed to the
Minnesota Court of Appeals from the Dakota County District Court's Order and
Judgment finding in favor of the City of Eagan; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Court of Appeals determined in its decision filed
May 8, 1984 that the Dakota County District Court should issue an Order
directing the City Council to grant the applicants a preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, the Dakota County District Court by an Order dated May 24, 1984
directed the City Council to grant approval of the appellants' preliminary
plat of Odell Addition as submitted without further delay or appearance by the
Odells;
NOW THEREFORE, upon motion duly made �y
by , it was RESOLVED as follows:
and seconded
1. That the Eagan City Council be and hereby is on record approving the
preliminary plat application of Odell Addition, subject to the following
conditions:
a. Park dedication requirements for the new lot shall be met by
cash donation of the standard single family lot amount of $420.00.
b. The preliminary plat shall be subject to Minnesota Department
of Transportation's review and comment because the plat abuts State
rights-of-way.
C. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff.
d. The applicant shall be required to provide sewer and water
service to the. newly -created lot.
e. Additional per lot trunk area assessments should be paid for
the additional lot at the rates in effect at the time of final plat
approval for trunk area sanitary sewer and water area assessments as a
condition of this plat approval.
f. This development shall accept its financial responsibility for
trunk area storm sewer assessments for one additional lot in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
g. Developer shall comply with all applicable City Code
provisions.
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated:
CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAGAN
BY:
1-75-
2
Its: City Clerk
HAucE, SB=. EIDE & FELLER, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS
9808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
FAGAN. MINNESOTA 89122
PAUL H. HAUGE
BRADLEY SMITH
KEVIN W. EIDE
DAVID D. KELLER June 18, 1984
Mr. Arnold Rempe
Attorney at Law
One Signal Hills
Nest St. Paul, MN 55118
RE: Eagan - McCarthy Property Easements
Dear Arnold:
ARG COOL 812
T[LIPMONI 484-4224
On Sunday, June 17, 1984, we discussed proposed terms for the settlement of
various easements from the McCarthy family running to the City of Eagan
covering both the north 80 acre parcel lying generally north of Wescott Road
and the south 70 acres south of Wescott Road. These terms gene rally.are as
follows:
1. McCarthys will grant a pond easement for Hurley Lake at an 830 elevation,
according to the legal description.
2. An easement for storm sewer utility purposes over the North 20 feet
running westerly of Hurley Lake will also be granted. Temporarily a
gravel access shall be used by the City over such easement for mainten-
ance access to the storm sewer lift station. At such time as the
property in the vicinity of Hurley Lake is developed, the City will
remove the gravel service road and relocate the maintenance access to the
lift station.
3. The City will relinquish the acquisition of the westerly arm of the
Hurley Lake and quit claim that area to the McCarthys.
4. McCarthys will grant an easement for the northeasterly ponds within the
south 70 acre parcel at approximately 830 elevation.
5. An easement will be granted for sanitary sewer trunk purposes across the
south 70 acres as described by legal description in the condemnation
action now in process.
6. A further easement for storm sewer trunk purposes lying parallel and
within the 20 foot permanent sanitary sewer trunk easement, together with
necessary temporary construction easement for trunk storm sewer and trunk
sanitary sewer through approximately June 30, 1985 will be conveyed.
1-76
Arnold Kempe
June 18, 1984
Page 2
7. An easement will be granted generally according to a sketch submitted to
you on Friday, June 15, 1984, running from the Patrick Eagan Park Lake on
the south, northerly to connect with the proposed storm sewer trunk
consisting of a 20 foot wide permanent and necessary temporary construc-
tion easement.
8. The water trunk easement appeal generally covering the north 80 acres
will be dismissed by the McCarthys. It is understood that no other
easements have formally been levied but that there are pending trunk area
storm sewer assessments and that the McCarthys will not pursue appeals of
those easements, although no committment by the McCarthys is made at the
present time.
9. The City will pay the McCarthys $165,000.00 plus interest at the rate of
11% per annum computed since September 1981 at which time the City gained
access for trunk storm sewer construction purposes on the north 80 acre
property. All interest accrued on deposits made by the City with the
Dakota County Clerk of District Court will be credited toward such
interest.
10. The condemnation file 092213 covering Hurley Lake will be continued until
a formal agreement is entered amongst the parties and upon execution of
the agreement, that condemnation action will be dismissed as well as the
sanitary sewer trunk condemnation file 096510.
PHH:ras
Very truly yours,
HAUGE, SMITH, EIDE &.KELLER, P.A.
Paul H. Hauge '
177
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 19, 1984
EAGAN CITY HALL
CITY ATTORNEY
1. Odell vs. City of Eagan
2. McCarthy Easements
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the
"Engineering/Special Assessment Divisions"
2. Capital Equipment Acquisition
3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins
Addition
16q
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 18, 1984
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
The following items are to be considered as a part of the Adminis-
trative Agenda:
CITY ATTORNEY
1. ODELL VS. CITY OF EAGAN-
As the City Council recalls the Minnesota Court of Appeals has
overruled the Trial Court in the case of Odell vs. City of Eagan
finding that the City Council did not have a valid basis for
denying the preliminary plat. The appellant court accurately points
out that the denial must be based upon sufficient reasons relative
to the City Ordinance. In the case of the Odell Lots, the only
apparent conflict with the Ordinance was in regard to the garage
which exists within set -back requirements. The Court of Appeals
has found that the garage was a non -conforming structure as distin-
guished from a non -conforming use. In their opinion, the sub-
division ordinance only addressed non -conforming uses unless, the
garage was not a valid basis for denial. Therefore, the City
Attorney is recommending that a resolution from the copies enclosed
on pages )7,+ through _175- be considered based on the recent
decision of the Court of Appeals.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To prove or deny the en-
closed resolution.
Expenses were incurred in the amount of $394.20 for the Supreme
Court, Court of Appeals and $1528.51 for witnesses and other
related expenses incurred by the appellants. The total cost for
the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals case was $1922.71. The
Odells' requested that the City consider total payment, however,
through negotiations and a dispute from the City Attorneys office
on payment of those expenses the total amount has been lowered to
$639.20. A motion is in order to consider payment in the amount
of $394.20 to the State of Minnesota for the Supreme Court, Court
of Appeals and to the Odell's in the amount of $245.00 with both
payments totaling $639.20.
!-7o
Administrative Agenda Information
June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting
Page Two
2. McCarthy Easements
The City Attorney, Director of Public Works and City Administrator
are making efforts to gain a desirable settlements for various
easements that are required for utility work through the McCarthy
property. In an effort to negotiate a reduction of approximately
$20,000 in interest costs, the City Attorney is planning to proceed
with the first day of trial and will report to the City Council
following the City Council tomorrow evening on the final status
of the City as it relates to our negotiations with McCarthy's
attorney. For a review of the easements which were discussed
by City Attorney Hauge with Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmembers
Smith and Wachter on Sunday evening, refer to pages 17 (� through
17'7_. Apparently, City Councilmember Thomas was unavailable
as is City Councilmember Egan who is on vacation.
ADMINISTRATOR
1. Personnel - Continuation of Internship Program Within the
"Engineering Special Assessment Division"
As a part of the 1984 budget, an engineering intern was authorized
for up to six months. Since this engineering intern is a civil
engineer and has been assisting with engineering tech work and
special assessments and due to the increased construction and
activity within engineering, it is desirable to continue the
internship for the remainder of 1984. The City Administrator
has discussed the position with the Director of Public Works
and feels the need is justified and is recommending consideration
by the City Council. The City Administrator also asked the Direc
for of Public Works to address the overall personnel needs in
engineering/special assessments, realizing that these needs will
be further addressed at the time of the 1985 budget development.
The Director of Public Works has prepared a memorandum describing
the intern needs at the present time and also the possibility
of more permanent employment in the future. Enclosed on pages
1716 through 1130 is a copy of the memo as prepared by the
Director of Public Works.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider approval or
denial of an internship program in the engineering department
for an additional six (6) months during calendar year 1984.
171
Administrative Agenda Information
June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting
Page Three
2. Capital Equipment Acquisition
As a part of the 1984 budget, a one ton dump truck with plow
and sander and a 32,000 GVW dump truck with plow were given review,
however final consideration was to be given during calendar year
1984 with the sale of equipment certificates. The Director of
Public Works has requested that these two (2) vehicles be purchased
during 1984 as explained in a memorandum enclosed on pages
/,il through A-1--
ACTION
-2.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an
authorization for advertising for bids to consider the purchase
of a four wheel drive one ton dump truck and a 34,000 GVW dump
truck with front wing plow attachments with final approval and
authorization of equipment certificates at the time the bid is
awarded.
Special Note: For additional information on this item, refer
to page 48 of your 1984 budget.
3. Gambling License/Eagan Hockey Boosters
A license application was received from the Eagan Hockey Boosters
for a combination gambling license to be used as a part of the
July 4 festivities. Enclosed is a copy of a letter from a repre-
sentative of the Eagan Hockey Boosters and the gambling license
application. The organization is requesting a waiver. of the
license fee which is $25.00 and the $10,000 bond requirement.
It is the tradition of the City Council that the bond requirement
be waived, however, the license fee be collected to offset any
administrative charges. 0.193
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THE MATTER: To approve or deny a
combination gambling license as requested by the Eagan Hockey
Boosters.
Administrative Agenda Information
June 19, 1984 City Council Meeting
Page Four
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
1. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval - Robins
Addition
The Robins Addition is located south of I-494 and west of T.H. 149
(old Dodd Road) incorporating east Blue Gentian Road. This prelimi-
nary plat received approval from the Council in November of
1981 and has received two previous extensions which expire on
June 15, 1984. They have requested a third extension to June
15, 1985, due to the fact that they have not yet completed the
technical process associated with trading rights-of-way and
property with MnDOT as a part of the progression of I-494.
It is anticipated that all formal documents and agreements would
be completed within the next 6 - 9 months which would allow
them to proceed with their final plat prior to June of 1985.
Due to the fact that this is the third request for an extension,
the staff would recommend that it be the final extension and
that the developers be so informed.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the third
and final extension of the preliminary plat approval for the
Robins Addition with the final expiration date of June 15, 1985.
i-73
fr ✓�`
LESOLUTION
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
JUNE _, 1984
WHEREAS, an application was submitted by David and Patricia Odell in
August of 1982 for a preliminary plat to split Lot 2, in McCarthy Ridge
Addition into two single family lots exceeding the minimum size requirements
for single family lots; and
WHEREAS, in August and again on October 5, 1982, the Eagan City Council
denied said application; and
WHEREAS, the applicants, David and Patricia Odell, appealed to the
Minnesota Court of Appeals from the Dakota County District Court's Order and
Judgment finding in favor of the City of Eagan; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Court of Appeals determined in its decision filed
May 8, 1984 that the Dakota County District Court should issue an Order
directing the City Council to grant the applicants a preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, the Dakota County District Court by an Order dated May 24, 1984
directed the City Council to grant approval of the appellants' preliminary
plat of Odell Addition as submitted without further delay or appearance by the
Odells;
MA
NOW THEREFORE, upon motion duly made �y
. it was RESOLVED as follows:
and seconded
1. That the Eagan City Council be and hereby is on record approving the
preliminary plat application of Odell Addition,. subject to the following
conditions:
a. Park dedication requirements for the new lot shall be met by
cash donation of the standard single family lot amount of $420.00.
b. The preliminary plat shall be subject to Minnesota Department
of Transportation's review and comment because the plat abuts State
rights-of-way.
C. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff.
d. The applicant shall be required to provide sewer and water
service to the.newly-created lot.
e. Additional per lot trunk area assessments should be paid for
the additional lot at the rates in effect at the time of final plat
approval for trunk area sanitary sewer and water area assessments as a
condition of this plat approval.
f. This development shall accept its financial responsibility for
trunk area storm sewer assessments for one additional lot in accordance
with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
g. Developer shall ,comply with all applicable City Code
provisions.
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated:
CITY COUNCIL - CITY OF EAOAN
BY:
175'
2
Its: City Clerk
HAUGE, SMITH. EIDE & HELLER, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS
9808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 88122
PAUL M. HAUGE
BRADLEY SMITH
KEVIN W. EIOE
DAVID O. KELLER
Mr. Arnold Rempe
Attorney at Law
One Signal Hills
Hest St. Paul, MN 55118
HE: Eagan - McCarthy Property Easements
Dear Arnold:
June 18, 1984
ARRA COD[ 012
T[LIJHON[ 4x4.4224
On Sunday, June 17, 1984, we discussed proposed terms for the settlement of
various easements from the McCarthy family running to the City of Eagan
covering both the north 80 acre parcel lying generally north of Wescott Road
and the south 70 acres south of Wescott Road. These terms generally are as
follows:
1. McCarthys will grant a pond easement for Hurley Lake at an 830 elevation,
according to the legal description.
2. An easement for storm sewer utility purposes over the North 20 feet
running westerly of Hurley Lake will also be granted. Temporarily a
gravel access shall be used by the City over such easement for mainten-
ance access to the storm sewer lift station. At such time as the
property in the vicinity of -Hurley Lake is developed, the City will
remove the gravel service road and relocate the maintenance access to the
lift station.
3. The City will relinquish the acquisition of the westerly arm of the
Hurley Lake and quit claim that area to the McCarthys.
4. McCarthys will grant an easement for the northeasterly ponds within the
south 70 acre parcel at approximately 830 elevation.
5. An easement will be granted for sanitary sewer trunk purposes across the
south 70 acres as described by legal description in the condemnation
action now in process.
6. A further easement for storm sewer trunk purposes lying parallel and
within the 20 foot permanent sanitary sewer trunk easement, together with
necessary temporary construction easement for trunk storm sewer and trunk
sanitary sewer through approximately June 30, 1985 will be conveyed.
Arnold Rempe
June 18, 1984
Page 2
7. An easement will be granted generally according to a sketch submitted to
you on Friday, June 15, 1984, running from the Patrick Eagan Park Lake on
the south, northerly to connect with the proposed storm sewer trunk
consisting of a 20 foot wide permanent and necessary temporary construc-
tion easement.
8. The water trunk easement appeal generally covering the north 80 acres
will be dismissed by the McCarthys. It is understood that no other
easements have formally been levied but that there are pending trunk area
storm sewer assessments and that the McCarthys will not pursue appeals of
those easements, although no committment by the McCarthys is made at the
present time.
9. The City will pay the McCarthys $165,000.00 plus interest at the rate of
11% per annum computed since September 1981 at which time the City gained
access for trunk storm sewer construction purposes on the north 80 acre
property. All interest accrued on deposits made by the City with the
Dakota County Clerk of District Court will be credited toward such
interest.
10. The condemnation file 092213 covering Hurley Lake will be continued until
a formal agreement is entered amongst the parties and upon execution of
the agreement, that condemnation action will be dismissed as well as the
sanitary sewer trunk condemnation file 096510.
PHH:ras
Very truly yours,
HAUGE, SMITH, EIDE & KELLER, P.A.
Paul H. Hauge
177
MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: JUNE 15, 1984
SUBJECT: PERSONNEL NEEDS - ENGINEERING/SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIVISIONS
As the City continues to grow so does the demand for services
of the Public Works Department through its Engineering and Special
Assessment Divisions. I have recently analyzed our workload
requirements and our available personnel in the Special Assessment
Division and have determined that there currently is a greater
workload than can be handled by the existing 1.5 employees.
Not only does the Special Assessment Division tabulate, spread,
certify and keep track of all final assessments associated with
public improvement contracts, but they are constantly requested
to provide information pertaining to past, present and pending
assessments everytime the ownership of a parcel changes. As
an example, every building permit issued through the Building
Inspection Department (which appears to be record setting each
year) requires a special assessment search and history on that
particular parcel by the builder, realtor or property owner.
In addition to these, every subdivision or lot split of an existing
parcel that either occurs at the County without our knowledge
or is processed through the City through our platting procedures,
require a subdivision of the records pertaining to assessments
along with a special assessment search as requested by the existing
and new property owners. While both of these items are associated
with growth and development of property, there is also the resale
of existing property that requires the same amount of research
in response to those requests. In 1983, approximately 1,500
special assessment searches had to be performed. The 1983 Annual
Report can provide further documentation to the work-related
statistics associated with this Division.
Assuming that the City's growth will no longer continue, present
manpower is necessary to maintain the records and provide the
information for the parcels currently existing within the City.
Assuming a fairly steady rate of growth with the projected comple-
tion of the interstate and available land to be developed, addi-
tional personnel is required to insure that this future development
occurs in an orderly manner to protect the City's financial
interests associated with the public improvements necessary to
accommodate this growth.
One of the most important steps in the development process is
the final plat application. It is at this point that the City
performs considerable research to determine outstanding past
and future assessment obligations. In addition, it is when legal
descriptions, street names, addresses, utility/ponding easements,
and City files and records are created which become the permanent
basis for the City's information system. Presently, this final
MEMO TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR
JUNE 15, 1984
PAGE TWO
plat process has been performed by the Public Works Director with
limited assistance being available from the Engineering and Special
Assessment Divisions. Subsequently, this process is not being
followed through with the degree of accuracy that is necessary to
protect the financial integrity of the City's operations along
with eliminating corrective work by other City personnel at a
later date which is time consuming and..inefficient based on our
work loads and time available.
The Engineering Division currently consists of the Assistant City
Engineer and two engineering technicians. One technician handles
all the administrative functions associated with street lights,
subdivision financial guarantees, as -built files, drainage com-
plaint investigations, etc. The other technician performs the
technical field work associated with inspections, surveying, pond
elevations, drafting, quantity calculations, etc.
With the Assistant City Engineer being responsible for 15-20
private developments within the City, grading permits applications,
review of new subdivision applications and related technical plans,
etc., the miscellaneous map updating, easement record keeping,
general assistance for research projects, etc. is presentlybeing
performed by a temporary intern position authorized with the 1984
budget which expires July 1. With the sealcoating program expand-
ing each year, street striping, traffic counts, greater accuracy
in easement acquisition/recording, inspection of in-house developed
contracts, the Engineering Division will be severely short staffed
if this intern position is terminated on July 1.
Therefore, I would like to request serious consideration of
authorizing the continuation of this intern program through the
completion of 1984 so that a more detailed analysis can be performed
for justification of requesting a full-time engineering technician
position as a part of the 1985 budget process.
The continuation: of this intern position and the hopeful evolution
into a full-time, permanent technician position would provide
considerable assistance to both the Engineering and the Special
Assessment Divisions in the final plat process and all related
documentation requirements. Please take into consideration the
fact that a considerable amount time spent by this intern has been
charged to City contracts which will be reimbursed through the 278
overhead portion of the special assessments. Therefore, I am
confident that a continuation of this position through the comple-
tion of 1984 will not create a financial burden to the general
budget and will greatly increase the Public Works Department's
ability to provide the level of service that is being demanded by
the growing public in Eagan.
While I realize that this memo appears to be excessive in length,
I assure you its brevity is a shortcoming to an adequate explanation
179
MEMO TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR
JUNE 15, 1984
PAGE THREE
of the level of service and detail associated with the work require-
ments currently being encountered by the Public Works Department
and certainly to be expanded as the City continues to grow.
Therefore, please inform me if we can receive the authorization
to continue this intern position through 1984 so that I can inform
the individual involved. Any additional information that may
be necessary will be gladly and promptly forwarded to your attention
as requested.
Respectfully submitted,
� jS�1���C!'t>�
homas A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
TAC/kf
cc: Rich Hefti, Assistant City Engineer
Ann Goers, Special Assessment Clerk
!80
MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: JUNE 15, 1984
SUBJECT: CAPITAL EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION - PUBLIC WORKS STREET
MAINTENANCE - REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLES #101 & #113
As a part of the 1984 budget, I submitted to the City Council for
consideration a request to replace two existing vehicles in the
Public Work Street Maintenance Division. These vehicles are
identified as follows:
VEHICLE #101. This is a 1976 Ford 1/2 ton pickup truck which
presently has 94,000 miles on it. Because of its limited
weight capacity, this vehicle is used primarily for manpower
transportation and parts running. Except for our larger pieces
of equipment (graders, dump trucks, etc.), this is the oldest
vehicle in the Public Works Maintenance Division. Due to its
mileage, age and body condition, limited repairs have been
performed and this vehicle has been relegated to nominal usage.
VEHICLE #113. This vehicle is i 1972 International Harvester
34,000 G.V.W. dump truck. This 12 year old vehicle has 95,700
miles with a deteriorating body. It is the oldest maintenance
vehicle in our fleet and is quickly deteriorating through the
heavy use that it receives in our gravel road and snow removal
maintenance programs. Similar to vehicle #112, which was re-
placed in 1983, this vehicle is starting to experience substan-
tial repair work at inopportune times (snow plowing) which
restricts its dependability and reliability for emergency snow
removal services.
In recommending the replacement for these vehicles, the Superinten-
dent of Streets and myself have taken into consideration the maximum
flexibility of various vehicles and the overall needs of the
Maintenance Division. Based on our review, we concur with our
previous request to receive authorization to purchase the following
vehicles:
REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLE #101. This replacement is proposed
to be a small 4 wheel drive one ton dump truck with plow and
sander to augment our cul-de-sac snow removal fleet and provide
additional ice control with another sanding unit. This vehicle
would be identical to the two vehicles purchase in 1983 for
our cul-de-sac snow removal fleet. Last winter's record snow
falls proved these vehicles to be well worth the investment
and greatly increased our cul-de-sac snow removal efficiency
as compared to previous vehicles. In addition, their ability
to perform sanding for effective ice control proved their
MEMO TO THOMAS L. HEDGES
JUNE 15, 1984
PAGE 2.
flexibility to be a valuable piece of equipment. The estimated
cost of this vehicle with the plow and sander is approximately
$19,500. An estimated $500 trade in for existing vehicle #101
has been taken into consideration in the estimated cost.
REPLACEMENT FOR VEHICLE #113. This replacement vehicle would
be of like kind to vehicle #113. It would be a 34,000 G.V.W.
dump truck complete with front and wing plow attachments.
This would be the similar specifications for the vehicle that
was approved for acquisition in 1983. This vehicle is large
enough to handle our mainline snow plowing and ice control
needs and yet small enough to provide maximum flexibility for
year round seasonal use such as street patching with our new
tailgate paver, gravel road maintenance, etc. The estimated
cost of this vehicle with related plow attachments is'approxi-
mately $53,000. This takes into consideration a $3,000 trade
in for existing vehicle #113.
As the Council may recall, with winter's heavy snow accumulation
and poor condition of our older. pieces of equipment, there were
times when 408 of our snow removal fleet was unavailable, inactive
or under repair. In addition, with last year's replacement vehicles
being ordered in the end of July, we have yet to receive our large
dump truck due .to the lead time required to manufacture these
specialized pieces of equipment.
Therefore, I would like to strongly urge the City Council to give
serious consideration to approving this request so that advertise-
ment for bids can be initiated as soon as possible to try and insure
that these new vehicles would be available for our snow removal
program of 1984 - 85.
I would be happy to review any of the vehicles with yourself or
the City Council, at your convenience, to discuss in further detail
our reasons and justifications for requesting replacement at this
time. Please let me know if any additional information is necessary
for consideration of this item by the City Council at their meeting
on June 19, 1984.
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas A. Colbert
TAC:jbd
CC: Bill Branch, Superintendent of Streets/Equipment
19�,
NEWSLETTER
FAGAM
Hockey Boosters, Inc.
Volume:
Number:
Date: -jL,..2 Q 1C I � ��
7011M #OCKFY FOR FAGAM
AND SUR R OUMD/NG COMM MI FS&
c;Ty 43� �-C'�
C,
6
M 010
O
i
4.Cb-y $o 4S E/LS
IS 3
I
Fee:
Annual:
Event Only
CITY OF EAGAN
BINGO AND/OR GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION
Date Submitted:
APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED
AT LEAST 30 DAYS PRIOR TO EVENT.
Type of License(s) requested: Bingo Paddlewheel
Tipboard Raffle
X cam" kr_f -t s-+
Name of Organization: � c, a � ..r v} , eke., do,.cTaier
I,
and I 40n4a.-
zation Name of Designated Bingo and/(
Gambling Manager,
/o -1 - q5 (first, middle, last)
Manager -Date of Birth
Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct the game(s) indicated
above in accordance with the provisions of the City of Eagan's Ordinance No. 70 and
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349.
Authorized OfficePr of Organization ...Designated Bingo and/or Gambling Manager of Organizatic
A. The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer of the
organization: ��// 1
1. TRUE NAME: ^oT �L,., ��, w �l�A L F_0 v4vLS
Last First FullMiddle
2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: ,ck -3 a�
Street City St a zip
3. DATE OF BIRTH: / c // 4. PLACE OF BIRTH: N i&.,v
MOnth,Da ,Year City,Sta vs?tf.
S. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic
offense? Yes No_
If yes, explain
B. The following is to be completed by the designated bingo and/or gambling
manager of the organization:
1. TRUE NAME: E/2�Zx 40,✓ D A-c.t- dF6aZ,•%0A_77'f
Last First FullMiddle
2. RESIDENCE ADDRESS: 39(40 �LLMVLE 6)"AAJ YN1pj
Street City State zip
3. DATE OF BIRTH: (o aG Y7)_4. PLACE OF BIRTH: WiZLjN/}�t
Month,Day,Year City,S—tate
5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic
offense? Yes No
If yes, explain
6. How long have you been a member of the organization?_
7. Are you gambling manager for any other organization? �O
8. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action
designating you bingo and/or gambling manager.
I`G9'
GAME INFORMATION:
1.
�p
Plac[,(e where games will be/�played' �a. }� „i Sc `-.00 L r q K k
l
C( / I 1 �CnN fpS1 bJG 0.4 -Q9=1N �1�NN S-3 /Q
Street Cit State Zip
2.
Are premises owned or leased by sponsoring organization?
3.
Date or dates games will be played
Date and/or da (s) of week
4.
Hours of the day games will be played:From_LL__A.M. to P.M.
—A. M. tofI_P.M.
5.
Maximum number of players V000
6.
Number and value of prizes to be awarded
ORGANIZATION INFORMATION:
1.
Address where regular meetings are held I3$r/ bf0paKk
Street City
2.
Day and time of meetings -i.. [ s 7 3 o ,0 ,.. — hyT cA h., I b�
3.
Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of the
State of Minnesota? Yes x No
4.
How long has the organization been in existence? 12
5.
How many members in the organization? b
6.
�
What is the pLLu��rpose of the organization? 1'ac v,•CQp ax r k.
7. -E ul c=3_on-
7 X YOfficers�ofwthe Organization:
NAME ADDRESS (street,city,zirl / TITLE
8
wive names or officers or any other persons paid for services to
the organization:
NAME ADDRESS (3treet,city, ziFl TITLE
9. In whose custody will organization records be kept? n
NAME ADDRESS .a ).$4 It j'/ c1
street,city,state,zip
SS7�
Business Telephone Number `( SS / O
Home Telephone Number
jqs'
10. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate
the players in the event any injury is sustained by played while
participating in the bingo and/or gambling game, or while on
the licensed premises, please state the: -'
NAME OF INSURER Dy aHl I( POLICY NO
11. Have you (Manager and Officer) read, and do you thoroughly under-
stand the provisions of all lacus, ordinance, and regulations
governing the operation of bingo and/or gambling games?'
12. Attach a list of aIll active members of the organization.
I declare that the information I have provided on this application is truth-
ful, and I authorize the City of Eagan to investigate the information sub-
mitted. Also, I have received from the City of Eagan a copy of the City
Ordinance No. 70 relating to bingo and/or gambling, d I have familiarized
myself with the contents and requirements therof.
y ) n==,., S, K1c �, N jLk ,
Signature of authorize o ficer of the organizat
—
Dace I
Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this day of
Signature of Notary Public
Commission expires on
Signature of designated bingo and/or gambling manager
of organization.
Date
Subscribed and sworn to me a notary public on -this day of
Signature of Notary Public
Commission expires on