The URL can be used to link to this page

04/02/1985 - City Council RegularAULNLA REGULAR HEETANU EAGAN CITY COUNCIL FAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL APRIL 2,.1985 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1I. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT,HEAD 13USINESS PA. Fire= Department 1C. Park & Recreation Department 1 B. Police Department ID. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA r A. Personnel Items ��.(o B. Contractors' Licenses 1 g'C. Project 43J, Present Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Lexington Square 2nd Addition) D. Project 437, Present Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing I (Windtree 4th Addition) IDE. Project 438, Present Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing I (Lexington Place South - Streets) p.�l F. Project 441, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing I (Westbury 3rd Addition - Streets & Utility Improvements) p IZ G. Project 435, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing / (Eagan Woods Office Park - Street & Utility Improvements) i 13H. Final Plat Approval, LeMay Lake Addition 151. Vacate Street Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Todd Jeppesen) Contract 8s-8, Final Payment/Acceptance (Blackhawk Road PImprovements) K. Contract 83-16, Final Payment/Acceptance (Sun Cliff 1st - Addition - Street & Utility Improvements) p.�� L. Contract 84-1, Final Payment/Acceptance (Lone Oak Road & I ] T.H. 55 Water Main) n,1U M. Contract 85-10, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for I Bids (Birch Park Addition - Streets & Utilities) pp 19 N. Dana's Eco Service for Rubbish Hauler License " './9 0. Indemnity Bond for Lost Coupons/Mortgage Bond Issue n r 19 P. Gambling License for Lions Club / z6Q. Proclamation for Minnesota Beautiful Month PZ(R. Final Plat Approval, Lunka Addition P' V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS .rJ5A. Project 424, LeMay Lake Addition (Streets & Utilities) r.,(IB. Vacation of Street & Utility Easement (LeMay Lake Addition) C. Multifamily Housing .Revenue Bond Application for the Kensington Place Project in the Amount of $16,000,000 (Continued from the 3-19-85 Council Meeting) VI.. OLD BUSINESS VII. VIII. IX. X. NEW BUSINESS A. Galaxie Court, M. G. Astleford, for Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot for 7 Warehouse/Storage Buildings and a Rezoning from R.B. (Roadside Business) to G.B. (General Business) for 2.7 Acres Located in Part of the NW 1/4 of Section 32 P0Lind Addition, M. G. Astleford, for Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot for 11 Warehouse/ Storage Buildings and 1 Outlot and a Rezoning from R-4 (Residential Multiple Family) to P.D. (Planned Development) for 8.5 Acres Located in Part of the NE 1/4 of Section 16 C. Final Resolution for LeMay Lake Apartments Project P Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds in, the Amount of $12,500,000 67D. Keyland Homes for a One Foot Variance from the Ten Foot Sideyard Setback Requirement for Lot 2, Block 2, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition, Section 29 70 E. Parkcliff Development for a Ten Foot Variance from the 30 Foot Frontyard Setback Requirement for Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, Parkcliff 3rd Addition, Section 34 P.74 F. Art Perri for Waiver of Plat for Lot 1, Block 2, Oak Chase 1st Addition 1� G. Forest Ridge for Revised Preliminary Plat, Don Gustafson, Consisting of Approximately 20.02 Acres and Containing 17 Lots for Multiple Development located in a Part of the Se 1/4 of the NW 1/4, Section 15 ADDITIONAL ITEMS x.93 A. Contract 85-1, Receive Bids/Award Contract (S & W Industrial Acres) 15B. Contract 85-2, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Peaceful Heights) C. Contract 85-7, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (LeMay Lake Addition — Streets & Utilities) VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) ADJOURNMENT 2 a, MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 29, 1985 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval of the March 19, 1985 regular City Council minutes and special minutes from meetings that were held on February 12, February 20, February 21, and March 12, and the agenda for the April 2, 1985 City Council meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: 40 FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- There are no items to be considered under Fire Department at this time. POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered under Police Department at this time. PARK & RECREATION DEPARTMENT C. Park & Recreation Department -- There are no items to be con- sidered under Park Department at this time. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D. Public Works Department -- The City Administrator will be reviewing items that relate to the Public Works Department as a part of Public Works Department Business. 1. Project 317/Blackhawk Road for Damage Claim by Robert Krueger -- At the March 19 City Council meeting, minutes of the Public Works Committee of the City Council dated March 5 were reviewed. Mr. Krueger objected to the committee's recommendation to offer $3,000 toward the reconstruction of the driveway to provide a more gentle slope by removing the existing "landing area" in front of Mr. Krueger's garage. Mr. Krueger appeared at the City Council meeting and expressed objection to the fact that he was not made aware of the Public Works Committee meeting and also stated he felt that $3,000 was not adequate for the damages caused to his property. The Public Works Committee scheduled another meeting which was held on March 26, 1985 to review the driveway with Mr. Krueger. The discusson that is reported in the. attached minutes of the March 5 meeting was basically the same dialogue that transpired at the Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Two March 26 Public Works Committee meeting. The minutes are enclosed on pages -.3 through Mr. Krueger feels the City -should split the difference of $20,264 or, in other words, the City's por- tion for his claim to damages would amount to $10,132. The commit- tee did not recommend a dollar amount different than the $3,000 that was reported at the March 5, 1985 City Council meeting. Mr. Krueger was directed to appear at the City Council meeting on April 2 and the claim for damages will again be reviewed with the City Council. At the present time, the committee's recommendation is $3,000 to be paid to Mr. Krueger for damages resulting in the slope caused to his driveway resulting from street and utility improve- ments installed under Project 317. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:. To review the claim for damages as submitted by Mr. Krueger and approve/modify the recom- mendation of the Public Works Committee. Special Note: Those present at the Public Works Committee meeting which was held at 5:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 26, included its chair- man, City Councilmemeber Wachter; Councilmember Thomas; City Administrator Tom Hedges; and Bob Rosene and Jerry Bourdon of the consulting engineering firm. Mr. Krueger, the property owner, was also present. A set of minutes of the Public Works Committee meeting will be prepared for the official record. 11 _7 MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE OF THE CITY COUNCIL C,.. EAGAN, MINNESOTA MARCH 5, 1985 A special meeting of the Public works Committee of the City Council was held on Tuesday, March 5, 1985, at 4:00 P.M. in the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were: Council member Ted Wachter (Chairman), Council member Jerry Thomas, Public Works Director Tom Colbert and Consulting Engineer Bob Rosene. AGENDA ITEM Review claim for damages in the amount of $20,264.00 as submitted by Robert D. Kruger, 4290 Blackhawk Road, resulting from street and utility improvements installed under Project 317. • DISCUSSION Bob Rosene presented details pertaining to the history of the design of the project and explained how the final street elevation design was subsequently raised approximately 5' from the original preliminary design and the alignment was shifted 10' further to the west to minimize the driveway slope to Mr. Kruger's property. This resulted in a 36' boulevard from back of curb to Mr. Kruger's property line as compared to a 16' boulevard along the west side of Blackhawk Road. This results in an additional 20' of boulevard width/green area available to Mr. Kruger than what previously existed prior to the improvement. The original design also proposed a service drive with a retaining wall to be located along the east side of Blackhawk Road adjacent to the Kruger and Flogsted property. However, through neighborhood meetings with the property owners, this service road/retaining wall concept was deleted at the request of .the property owners. In addition, during construction in response to Mr. Kruger's complaint pertaining to the steepness of his driveway, the project was expanded to include the construction of a "hammerhead" turnaround at the base of his driveway to provide an additional parking spot for Mr. Kruger at his specific request in considera- tion of the steeper driveway slope. The Committee then discussed the estimated cost ($3,000.00) required to reconstruct the driveway to provide a more gentle slope by removing the existing "landing area" in front of Mr. Kruger's garage. By sloping the driveway from 15' in back of curb to 5' in front of the driveway, the resulting slope would be approximately 12.08 as compared to the existing 13.5%. This would result in a maximum reduction of 1�' at the point of the "landing area". The slope of his driveway before the Blackhawk Road improvement was approximately 10.5% for comparison purposes. MA Minutes of the Public Works Committee of the City Council March 5, 1985 ;. Page 2 RECOMMENDATION It was a recommendation of the Public Works Committee that the City offer a settlement of $3,000.00 in response to the claim submitted in consideration for the estimated cost to reconstruct the driveway to a more acceptable 12% slope. This recommendation is to be presented to the City Council at the March 19, 1985, meeting for formal consideration and approval. ADJOURN The Public Works Committee meeting adjourned at 5:10 P.M. • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Three There are eighteen items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one resolution by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the consent agenda and placed under additional items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. Personnel Items: 1. Rita Cordell, Dispatcher Trainee, Resignation -- Rita Cordell, • a dispatcher trainee has resigned effective March 2.6, 1985. The Police Department is in the process of advertising for a replace- ment. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Dispatcher Trainee Rita Cordell. 2. Utility Maintenance Supervisor/Treatment Plant Operator -- The City Administrator and Superintendent of Utilities interview six applicants for the position of Utility Maintenance Supervisor/Treat- ment Plant Operator on Tuesday, March 26, 1985. There is a final interview scheduled for Monday, April 1, 1985, at 3:00 p.m. The City Administrator will brief the City Council as a part of the Administrative Agenda on Monday, April 1, as to which applicant will be recommended for the position. There are at least three candidates who are highly qualified for the position. This position • is budgeted for 1985 and the job description was approved recently by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the individual recommended by the City Administrator as a part of the Administra- tive Agenda for the position of Utility Maintenance Supervisor/ Treatment Plant Operator. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Four CONTRACTOR LICENSES B. Contractor Licenses -- Enclosed on page is a list of con- tractors who are renewing or who have been selected and retained as a builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside in Eagan. They have references from other municipalities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of con- tractor licenses as presented. • • I APRIL 2, 1985 CITY COUNCIL MEETING lI7IU71:1 t.1 \iY::MN: 1. ANDERSON-SODERMAN, INC 2. E. BARLOW & SONS CONSTRUCT 3. MARK CALVIN CONSTRUCTION 4. GENE ELDEEN CONSTRUCTION 5. GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT CO. 6. MARK JOHNSON CONST. 7. PAUL V4ILENTINY CONST. HEATING & VENTILATING: • 1. J&B SnT• 2. KLEVE HEATING & A/C, INC. 1. ED BROWN PLUMBING 2. CIARK PLUMBING 3. D.C. MECHANICAL 4. OL -BERG CONSTRUCTION 5. PEIINE PLUMBING & HEATING 6. PODANY PLUMBING 7. SCHULTIES PLUMBING 0 I Agenda Information April 2, 1985 City Page Five Memo Council Meeting FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/LEXINGTON SQUARE C. Project 433, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Lexington square 2nd Addition - Utility Improvements) - Council received a petition for trunk storm and sanitary sewer imnprovements within the Lexington Square 2nd Addition on February 5, 1985, and authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of trunk storm and sanitary sewer within this development. The feasibility report for this project has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for review in scheduling the public hearing to be held on May 7, • 1985. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 433 (Lexington Square 2nd Addition - trunk storm and sanitary sewer improvements) and order the public hearing to be held on May 7, 1985. �J ro Y Agenda information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Six FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/WINDTREE 4TH ADDN. D. Project 437, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public 'Hearing (Windtree 4th Addition - Street and Utility Improvements) -- On March 5, 1985, Council accepted the petition for this project from the owner and 'developer of the proposed Windtree 4th Addition requesting the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Windtree 4th Addition. The feasibility report has been completed. _Staff recommends May 7, 1985, for the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive report for Project 437 (Windtree 4th Addition utility improvements) and order a public hearing May 7, 1985. G the feasibility - streets and to be held on • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Seven FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/LEXINGTON PLACE S. E. Project 438, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Lexington Place South - Street Improvements) -- On March 5, 1985, Council accepted a petition from U.S. Homes Corporation for street improvements within the Lexington Place South Addition and ordered the preparation of a feasibility report. The feasibility report for this project has now been completed. Staff recommends a May 7, 1985, hearing date for the public hearing. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 438 (Lexington Place South - street improvements) and order the public hearing to be held on May 7, 1985. • /d Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Eight FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/WESTBURY 3RD ADDN. r F. Project 441, Feceive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Westbury 3rd Addition - Streets and Utility Improvements) -- On March 19, 1985, Council accepted a petition from the developer and owner of the Wesbury 3rd Addition to prepare a feasibility report for this project incoporat'ing the construction of streets and utilities. This feasibility report has now been completed. Staff recommends May 7, 1985, for the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility • report for Project 441 (Westbury 3rd Addition - street and utility improvements) and order the public hearing to be held on May 7, 1985. • • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Nine FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARR G. Project 435, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Eagan Woods Office Park - Street and Utility Improvements) -- On February 5, 1985, Council accepted a petition from the owners and developers of the Eagan Woods Office Park to prepare a feasibility report on the installation of street and utility improvements within this development. The feasibility report has been completed. Staff recommends a May 7, 1985, public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS report for Project 435 (Eagan utility improvements) and order May 7, 1985. ITEM: To receive the feasibility Woods Office Park - street and the public hearing to be held on Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Ten FINAL PLAT/LEMAY LAKE H. Approve Final Plat, LeMay Lake Addition (Opus) -- We have received an application for final plat approval for the LeMay Lake Addition located south of Lone Oak Road between the Poppler Addition and I -35E. A copy of the proposed final plat is enclosed on page � _ for the Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval of January 15, 1985, have been satisfactorily complied with through this final plat application. All application materials and submittals have been reviewed and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for LeMay Lake 1st Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /3 • • EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE IST ADDITION 0 N $ ��-Q-�.� ..—t•—._ +w anr.u+�a�r..•� at VICINITY YAP IIC 0.1 21.w 23 d fl ` I l_ � •..,.. uV I w—�� w / w —.�. a rl Y a .nN T\ • mu PLACE �� EXHIBIT 11Aa rye ;�E�'" ; • o I SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS .C. 0 rn X 1 , ny t� LL P K r � y LL! s -! �y c IC11i 101 U L1 LJ _ F F Wq0'• T +r• N r.. .1• EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE IST ADDITION 0 N $ ��-Q-�.� ..—t•—._ +w anr.u+�a�r..•� at VICINITY YAP IIC 0.1 21.w 23 d fl ` I l_ � •..,.. uV I w—�� w / w —.�. a rl Y a .nN T\ • mu PLACE �� EXHIBIT 11Aa rye ;�E�'" ; • o I SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS .C. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Eleven VACATE STREET EASEMENT/PETITION/PUBLIC HEARING/TODD JEPPESEN I. Vacate Street Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Todd Jeppesen) -- Mr. Jeppesen of 4955 Pilot Knob Road is submitting a petition to vacate a highway easement upon which his house is located. Staff has researched the reason for the particular location of the highway easement and found that an error was made at the County in preparing the legal description for this easement. Apparently, this easement was supposed to have been described off the center line of Pilot Knob Road rather • than the section line as was recorded. In discussions with the County, it appears the County still requires a slope easement in this area. Staff would recommend that as a condition of vacating this easement, Mr. Jeppesen sign a slope easement required by the County based on the correct legal description. However, this can be done at the time of public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the petition to vacate the existing highway easement on Mr. Jeppesen's property and order the public hearing to be held on April 16, 1985. FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/BLACKHAWK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS J. Contract 83-8, Final Payment/Acceptance (Blackhawk Road • Improvements) -- We have received a request for final payment from the contractor through our consulting engineering firm along with a verification statement of compliance with City approved plans and specifications for the construction and completion of the road improvements under Project 317 and 355 and trunk storm sewer construction under Project 354. All final inspections have been performed and verified by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for final approval and acceptance by Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the eighth and final payment in the amount of $478.09 to Keller Construction for Contract 83-8 (Blackhawk Road improvements) and authorize the acceptance for perpetual maintenance. /d Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twelve FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/SUN CLIFF 1ST ADDN. R. Contract 83-16, Final Payment/Acceptance (Sun Cliff 1st Addition - Street and Utility Improvements) -- We have received a request for final. payment from the contractor through our consulting engineering firm along with the verification statement of compliance with the City approved plans and specifications for the construction and completion of streets and utilities within the Sun Cliff 1st Addition. All final inspections have been performed and verified by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for final approval and acceptance by Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS final payment in the amount Construction for Contract 83-16 and utility improvements) and perpetual maintenance. ITEM: To approve the seventh and of $7,291.50 to Burschville Sun Cliff 1st Addition - streets authorize the acceptance for • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Thirteen FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/LONE OAK ROAD & T.H. 55 WATER MAIN L. Contract 84-1, Final Payment/Acceptance (Lone Oak Road & T.H. 55 Water Main) --We have received a request for final payment from the Contractor through our consulting engineering firm along with a verification statement of compliance with City approved plans and specifications for the construction and completion of water main along T.H. 55, T.H. 149 and Pilot Knob Road and .I -35E. Also included in construction was a storm sewer outlet for Pond DP -12. The water main was completed under Project 391 and the storm • sewer under 410. All final inspections have been performed and verified by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for final approval and acceptance by Council action. ACTION TO HE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 7th and final payment in the amount of $5,012.08 to W & G Rehbein Construction for Contract 84-1 (Lone Oak Road and T.H. 55 - water main) and authorize the acceptance for perpetual maintenance. L Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Fourteen CONTRACT 85-10/ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS/BIRCH PARK ADDITION M. Contract 85-10, Approve Plans & Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Birch Park Addition - Streets & Utilities) - Detailed plans and specifications for providing for the installation of streetsand utilities to service the Birch Park Addition have been completed and are being presented to the Council approval along with a request for authorization to advertise for a bid opening. With the exception ofthree temporary slope easements, all other easements and right-of-way necessary for the installation of this contract are available through the final platting of the Birch Park Addition. The temporary easements to be obtained are along the southside of Deerwood Drive. Although these temporary slope easements would be desirable to obtain according to our consulting engineers they are not absolutely necessary for the construction of Deerwood Drive. without these slope easements a minor modification to the slope will be required along with some minor retaining walls to stay within the existing right-of-way. Our consulting engineers and City Attorney's office are pursuing obtaining the desirable temporary easements, however, if they should fail in their attempt to obtain these easements, the project can still be built. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 85-10 (Birch Park Addition Street and Utility Improvements) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, May 2, 1985. Nil • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Fifteen RUBBISH HAULER LICENSE N. Dana's Eco SErvice for Rubbish Hauler License -- Dana Turner of Burnsville has applied for a rubbish hauler license. Mr. Turner is currently licensed under the name Dana's Eco Service in Blooming- ton, Savage and Lakeville. He has paid for two trucks and provided copies of a bond insurance and rate schedule. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the rubbish hauler's license for Dana Turner of Burnsville, who is operating a business under the name Dana's Eco Service. • INDEMNITY BOND/LOST.COUPONS O. Indeminity Bond for Lost Counpons/Mortgage Bond Issue -- The Director of Finance has received a request from the City's paying agent, First Bank St. Paul, for lost coupons that were issued for the first housing mortgage revenue bond series in 1979. This project relates to, the Coachman Oaks project. Some minutes have been prepared by legal counsel on behalf of the City's paying agent outlining a resolution that authorizes payment of interest in lieu of issuance of duplicate coupon. The paying agent is not authorized to pay the indemnity bond in lieu of lost coupons without proper authorization by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize proper execution of an indemnity bond for the lost coupons relating to the Coachman Oaks Company project first mortgage housing revenue bonds to the . paying agency department of First Bank St. Paul. GAMBLING LICENSE/LIONS CLUB P. Gambling License for Lions Club -- An application for a gambling license was submitted by the Eagan Lions Club requesting that bingo, tip board, paddle wheel and raffle events be allowed at the Diamond T Ranch on Saturday, April 13, 1985. The Lions Club has been approved by the State Gambling Commission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a gambling license for the Eagan Lions Club for an event scheduled on April 13, 1985 at the Diamond T Ranch. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Sixteen PROCLAMATION/MINNESOTA BEAUTIFUL MONTH Q. Proclamation for Minnesota Beautiful Month -- Enclosed is a copy of a request from Governor Rudy Perpich to proclaim May 1985 to be Minnesota Beautiful Month. A copy of the proclamation is enclosed on pages 1/ through yv . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize Mayor Blomquist to proceed with proclaiming the month of May as Minnesota Beautiful Month. .9 • RUDY PERPICH GOVERNOR February 28, 1985 Dear Mayor: S'T'ATE OF MEWNESOTA OFPRE OP THE GOVRTWOR ST. PAUL 66166 In keeping with Minnesota's reputation as the state with the good life, I have proclaimed May 1985 to be Minnesota Beautiful • Month. During the month of May, the Minnesota Beautiful Program will organize Minnesotans in a statewide effort to improve their communities. I am hoping that every community throughout the state will participate with their own cleanup, recycling and beautification programs. One of the most important things we can do to facilitate a healthy economy is to make Minnesota a more attractive and pleasing place to live, work and do business. We cannot have a sound economy without a sound environment. I feel that you, as a leader in your community, can be instrumental in encouraging citizens to undertake environmental cleanup projects. All of us have a stake in preserving the . natural beauty of our state, and I know that Minnesota works best when it harnesses the talents and energies of its people. I have asked Frank Ongaro (297-3190) and Nick Riley (297-4736) of the Environmental Resources Development office to, be available for any questions you may have about participation in Minnesota Beautiful Month, and I encourage you to contact them before initiating cleanup projects within your community. Sincerely, 4RU PERPI Governor AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ProdarnafiQn WHEREAS: The State of Nlnnemto is rich In natural resources and beauty: and WHEREAS: Every citl:en mould make a diligent effort to keeo we maranment clean and healthful by Wrktna together to preserve clean air. fresh Wier and the natural beauty of our note; and WHEREAS: Alinnesoo Beautiful Month is organising Mbmesorans in a sotewide effon to improve . the community mvironmmt try astabBlEhg recycling engrams. clean up efforts. Landscaping. beautification and tree planting; and WHEREAS: Minnesota Beautiful committee. a group of public and prlwte wonteen. ongimted Minnesota Beautiful Month to focw attention an the efforts of concerned k inneeotons; NOW. THEREFORE. 1. Rudv Peroich. Governor of the State of Minnesota. do hereby orocluim the month o/ May IDBS. to be In Minnesota. end ask all citlserus from buatneeas. civic groups. goveremmt agencies and other organizations to sort together to proaerve the natural beauty of sue tote rot only wing M4mesota • Beautiful .Month, pd throughout Na year. SECRETARY OF STATE IN WITNESS .HEAEOF. I nave hereunto sat my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State of Minnesota to be affixed at the State Capitol this twenty-seventh day of November In the year of aur Lora one thousand nine hundred and eighty-four, and of the State the one hundred twenty-seventh. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Seventeen FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, LUNKA ADDITION R, Final Plat Approval, Lunka Addition --We have received an application for a final plat approval for the Lunka Addition located south of Towerview Road between Pilot Knob Road and Quarry Lane. A copy of the proposed final plat is enclosed on page � for the Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval of October 30, 1984, have been satisfactorily complied with through this final plat application. All application materials and submittals have been reviewed and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council action. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Lunka Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • ,�3 - -- --H prw xe-E � �u[i w wi ee] eq, W Gi WI 001 Zlr if wl/1 .t\ I Is DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: AL 5 eEING 5 FEFT IN WIDTH, UNLESS OT4ERxISE INDICATED AND AD,'OINING LCT LINES IANC 10 FE=T IN WIDTH,UNLESS OTHERWISL IN'�_ATEC, AND ADJOINING STREET LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. i I / wiz+ I/i is mea"o• sei .o."T z�., :e w a : TOWERVIEW ROAD s A _V_ 4 r-- „E ]G e yl I I I9 2 BLOT k I K I loo oa I I. � O t0 0 Oj O O O Z ep zr a oa ..e e.�i z,e zn .eer wToame fEC. W, i.3Tu.• Y. i1. i 218.20- uuG a ,M_N a.r T.E w ey...o apGf ei TrG u w.,H N 89.44' 28" E ""'G ""�'%z sv. •^.+. ET"• azo. L I "OeM No zu LE NORTH SCALE: 1"- 501 0 50 100 I O 200 SOLE a FEET OOENOTES 1/2 INCH BY IS INCH IRON MONUMENT SET -MARRED WITH REGISTRATION NO. 16085 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN } THE SOUGH LINE OF THE N,W_ ve OF THE N.W. 114 0- SEC 10. VICINITY MAP ,A -- SECTION 10, T. 27 h, R.20 W. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Eighteen 424, LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION (STREETS & UTILITIE A. Project 424, LeMay Lake 1st Addition (Street and Utility Improvements) --In response to a petition submitted by the developers of the proposed LeMay Lake lst Addition, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of the required streets and utilities for this proposed development. This feasibility report was completed and presented to the Council on March 19, 1985. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners proposed • to a assessed under this project. Enclosed on pages „y through is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. The consulting engineer and Acting City Engineer will be available to answer any questions or concerns raised as a result of this presentation. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the installation of streets and utilities under Project 424 for the LeMay Lake 1st Addition. 714:� REPORT ON LeMAY LAKE ' 1st ADDITION 0 UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 424 mo EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1985 /� /� Comm: 49841 //�� /3o.cedUd, RO"Ks, !�%d�a a fYd 4c&k4, Yom St P"4 Mb moeota ,Z/ SJ. P..l, hf:.r.rev I PAa.. 6t2-636-4600 March 5, 1985 Honorable Mayor 6 Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Re: LeMay Lake lot Addition Utility and Street Improvements Project No. 424 Our File No. 49341 Dear Mayor and Council: Orr. rr. Bon.rroo, P.E. Robnl W. R.rnr, P.E. J.ePh C. Andblih. P.E Bmdlord A. Lemberg, P.E. Rlrhard E. turner. P.E. James C. Olson. P.E. chmm R. Cook. P.E. Rel/A A- Gordon. P.E. Thom. E. Noyes. P.E. RlshaM W. F.mr, P.E. R.&I, G. 9shuniahl, P.E. Momin L. Sorala. P.E. Donald C. 8argoM1. P.E. Jerry A. Bcumo.. P.E. Mark A. Ha.on. P.E. TM A. f4m. P. E. Michael T. Rawmann. P.E. R.her, R. Pyr/fele, P.E. Daum 0. Loskmm P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pa"Uky Harlan M. Oboe Transmitted herewith is our report for LeMay Lake lot Addition, Utility and Street Improvements, Project No. 424. This report discusses utility and street improvements within and adjacent to LeMay Lake lot Addition and presents cost estimates for these improvements. Also included is a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00,/RO,SSEENEE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, �lGv�1- Tom` evi �. Mark( A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of^the / State of Minnesota. rl Mark A. Hanson INC. Dat e: March 5. 1985 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Date: 6393c "2 `-7 • 0 SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of utilities and street to service LeMay Lake lot Addition. Also included is construction of a lateral storm sewer from LeMay Lake to the north side of Lone Oak Road (Co. Rd. No. 26), to provide additional storm sewer capacity to Eagandale Center Industrial Park. LeMay Lake let Addition consists of 3 multiple buildings containing 288 dwelling unite. LeMay Lake lot Addition is located on the south side of Lone Oak Road westerly of I -35E. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible froman engineering standpoint and is in accordance with Master Utility and Street Plan for the • City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can beat be carried out a one contract. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - It is proposed to extend an 8" PVC sanitary sewer easterly from an existing sanitary sewer manhole located along the west line of LeMay Lake lot Additions. The sanitary sewer will be extended easterly through LeMay Lake lot Addition and southerly within Eagandale Place. The sanitary sewer will be constructed at a proper elevation to serve the abutting property • along Eagandale Place. Services will be constructed to 5 feet of each build- ing complex in the LeMay Lake Addition. Water Main - It is proposed to extend an 8" DIP water main southerly in Eagan - dale Place as shown on the attached drawing. The 8" water main will connect to an existing stub provided at Lone Oak Road. A combination of 8" and 6" water main will be constructed through LeMay Lake lot Addition providing not only water service but also proper fire protection. LeMay Lake lot Addition is located in .the intermediate pressure zone. Static and residual pressures are 62 and 38 psi respectively at Lone Oak Road and Eagandale Place. These pressures will be higher as.you approach LeMay Lake. Services will be con— structed to 5 feet of each building complex in the LeMay Lake Additon. Page 1. 6393c -7d Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein provides for extending a 54" RCP storm sewer in Eagandale Place from LeMay Lake to and across Lone Oak Road. The 54" RCP is not only sized to convey drainage from the adjacent property along Eagandale Place but also to provide additional storm sewer capacity to Eagandale Center Industrial Park. The existing 48" RCP which presently serves the Eagandale Center Industrial Park was properly sized at the time of its construction. However, rainfall intensities and the runoff coefficient for this area have increased. Rainfall intensities for a 5 year design storm have increased nearly 28%. The anticipated runoff coefficient which composes the impervious surface along with those areas which are pervious has also in- • creased nearly 30%. Therefore, the combination of a newly constructed 54" RCP in conjunction with the existing 48" RCP will provide this area with a storm sewer system designed for nearly a 5 year storm. Catch basins will also be constructed from the 54" RCP to convey drainage within Eagandale Place. A 24" RCP storm sewer will be extended westerly from the 54" RCP located in Eagandale Place in LeMay Lake 1st Addition. This storm sewer will be ex- tended to the west property line of the LeMay Lake let Addition to provide drainage from a low area located immediately to the west. Storm sewer leads. • and catch basins will be extended from the 24" RCP by the developer to provide drainage internally within LeMay Lake let Addition. A portion of the existing 48" RCP storm sewer will have to .be relocated at the southeast corner of the most southeasterly building. Also included is construction of a skimming tank which the newly constructed storm sewer will discharge into. The skimming tank will retain large debris and floatables such as paper, empty cans, organ- ic litter and .oil. However, because it is not proposed to remove these mater- ials by mechanical means, the skimming tank will have to be visually inspected periodically by the City along with the removal of any materials found at that time. Page 2. 6393c ,-%CJ Street - It is proposed to construct Eagandale Place southerly 900 feet from Lone Oak Road and a small portion of concrete sidewalk along Lone Oak Road as shown on the attached drawing. Eagandale Place will be constructed 48' wide at Lone Oak Road and taper down to 36' wide at the first easterly street stub. The remaining street width will be 36' to the southerly end. It is proposed to construct Eagandale Place to a 9 ton design thickness. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: The area to be included for construction and assessment purposes is listed below. No construction will occur outside of those areas proposed to be assessed. • . ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA LeNay Lake 1st Addition Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2 Eagandale Center Industrial Park Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, Block 4 Lot 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 (200-05), Block 5 Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Block 6 • Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 6 Lot 1, Block 1 NW 1/4, Section 10 Parcel 020-26 Parcel 030-26 NE 1/4, Section 10 Parcel 010-01 Parcel 010-04' Page 3. 6393c -�o COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: Sanitary Sewer $103,660 Water Main 107,980 Storm Sewer 448,440 Street 92,630 TOTAL ................... $752,710 The total estimated project cost is $752,710 which includes contingencies • and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited pro- perty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral costs including overhead will be revised based on final costs. SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess sanitary sewer on a front foot basis. The sanitary sewer included entirely within LeMay Lake lat Addition • will be assessed to Lot 1, Block 2. The sanitary sewer in Eagandale Place will be assessed entirely against the unplatted parcel (020-26) located on the east side of Eagandale Place. It is proposed however that the sanitary sewer overdepth in LeMay 1st Addition required to serve Parcel 020-26.be assessed to Parcel 020-26. Trunk area sanitary sewer has previously been assessed. WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess water main on a front foot basis. The water main in Eagandale Place from Lone Oak Road to the first easterly stub street will be assessed evenly between Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 LeMay Lake 1stAddition. The remaining water main in Eagandale Place will be as Page 4. 6393c 3/ sessed entirely against the unplatted parcel (020-26) located on the east side. The water main included within Lot 1, Block 2 LeMay Lake lat Addition will be assessed entirely to Lot 1, Block 2. It is also proposed to assess lateral benefit from trunk water main for the 16" DIP in Lone Oak Road. Trunk area water main for this area was previously assessed. STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is separated into lateral and trunk storm sewer. Trunk storm sewer is limited to all costs associated with con- atruction of the skimming tank. All remaining storm sewer is considered lat- eral. Lateral storm sewer is further separated into lateral for LeMay Lake • area and lateral for Eagandale Center Industrial Park. Lateral storm sewer for LeMay Lake area is proposed to be assessed at a lineal foot rate based on a required equivalent 24" RCP including miscellaneous manholes. The lineal footage was determined by what each parcel would be required to construct as its own lateral storm sewer to LeMay Lake if the 54" RCP in Eagandale Place and the existing 48" RCP were not constructed. The estimated rate per lineal foot is $45.14. The remaining lateral storm sewer which equals the total storm sewer cost minus the trunk storm sewer and the lateral storm sewer for requested by representatives of the owners (Opus, Northwestern Mutual Life In- surance Company, Alscor Investors, Inc.). It is also proposed to assess trunk area storm sewer to those parcels south of Lone Oak Road which have not been previously assessed as shown on the attached drawing. STREET: It is proposed to assess •all street costs associated with Eagandale Place equally to the abutting property on a front foot basis. Page 5. 6393c 3z LeMay Lake area is proposed to be assessed on an area basis to the undeveloped. parcels located north of Lone Oak Road in Eagandale Center Industrial Park as requested by representatives of the owners (Opus, Northwestern Mutual Life In- surance Company, Alscor Investors, Inc.). It is also proposed to assess trunk area storm sewer to those parcels south of Lone Oak Road which have not been previously assessed as shown on the attached drawing. STREET: It is proposed to assess •all street costs associated with Eagandale Place equally to the abutting property on a front foot basis. Page 5. 6393c 3z TRUNK ASSESSMENT: All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. Trunk asseassment rates will be assessed based on the rates in effect at the time of the public hearing. Trunk assessment rates proposed to be assessed as part of this project are listed below: Water Main Lateral Benefit from Trunk -(Multi -Family) $19.57/f.f. Storm Sewer Trunk Area - Single Family $0.048/s.f. Multi -Family $0.061/s.f. Commercial -Industrial $0.072/9.f. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: A.) Sanitary Sewer Lateral Lateral Assessment B.) Water Main Lateral Lateral Assessment Lateral Benefit from Trunk C.) Storm Sewer Lateral Trunk Lateral Assessment Trunk Area 6393c Project Cost Revenue Balance $103,660 $103,660 $103,660 $103,660 - 0 - $107,980 $107,980 11,801 $107,980 $119,781 +$11,801 $407,490 40,950 $407,490 104,100 $448,440 $511,590 +$63,150 Page 6. -'�3 • • D.) Street Lateral $ 92,630 Lateral Assessment $ 92,630 $ 92,630 $ 92,630 - 0 - TOTAL..................................................... The anticipated project balance is +$74,951. PROJECT SCHEDULE • Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 7. 6393c +$74,951 March 19, 1985 April 2, 1985 April 2, 1985 May 2, 1985 May 7, 1985 August 16, 1985 September 1985 May 1986 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE LEMAY LAKE IST ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 424 A.) SANITARY SEWER 1,800 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. $ 54,000 200 Lin.ft. 6" PVC Sanitary sewer service in pl. @ $9.00/lin.ft, 1,800 8 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 7,200 110 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/lin.ft. 7,700 12,0 Lin.ft. 8" DIP outside drop @ $130.00/lin.ft. 1,560 1 Each 811x6" wye branch @ $60.00/each 60 8 Lin.ft. 6' CISP riser in pl. @ $15.00/lin.ft, 120 1 Each Connect 8" PVC to ex. MH 0500.00/each 500 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 2,000 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,000 Total $ 75,940 +5% Contingencies 3,800 $ 79,740 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin, b Bond Interest 23,920 A.) TOTAL SANITARY SEWER .......................... $103,660 B.) WATER MAIN 2,050 Lin.ft. 8" DIP Water main in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft. $ 28,700 1,550 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 18,600 9 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $950.00/each 8,550 6 Each 8" Resilient wedge gate valve @ $450.00/each 2,700 6 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve @ $400.00/each 2,400 8,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.20/lb. 9,600 1 Each Wet tap 8" DIP to ex, 16" DIP @ $1,500.00/each 1,500 6393c Page 8. 3-5 • • B.) WATER MAIN (CONT'D) 1 Each Connect 8" dIP to ex. 8" CIP @ $500.00/each 500 LUMP SUM Patch bituminous pavement @ $2,000.00/L.S. 2,000 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 3,550 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 3,550 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. Total $ 79,100 150 Lin.ft. +5% Contingencies 3,960 120 Lin.ft. $ 83,060 60,000 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest 24,920 B.) TOTAL WATER MAIN $107,980 • C.) STORM SEWER 1,180 Lin.ft. 54" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $150.00/lin.ft. $177,000 670 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 20,100 40 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 960 150 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 3,300 120 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 54" RCP in pl. @ $500.00/lin.ft. 60,000 2 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 1,800 6 Each Std. 6' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,500.00/each 9,000 5 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @$800.00/each 4,000 65 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp, in pl. (6' dia.) @ $120.00/lin.ft. 7,800 • 250 Lin.ft. Remove and relay 48" RCP storm sewer @ $50.00/lin.ft. 12,500 . LUMP SUM Skimming structure @ $30,000.00/L.S. 30,000. 2,060 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,060 Total $328,520 +5% Contingencies 16,430 $344,950 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin, b Bond Interest 103,490 C.) TOTAL STORM SEWER ............................ 1. $448,440 Page 9. 6393c D.) STREET 300 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. $ 900 300 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 1,800 5,000 Sq.yde. Subgrade preparation @ $0.40/sq.yd. 2,000 2,450 Ton Claes 5 100% Crushed quarry rock @ $7.00/ton 17,150 800 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @ $12.00/ton 9,600 400 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $14.00/ton 5,600 65 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $210.00/ton 13,650 250 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.20/gal. 300 2,060 Lin,ft. B618 Concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 10,300 220 Lin.ft, concrete sidewalk @ $7.00/lin.ft. 1,540 200 Lin.ft. Reinforcing for concrete curb S gutter @ $0.50/lin.ft. 100 9 Each Adjust MH and CB frame @ $150.00/each 1,350 4 Each Adjust gate valve & box @ $100,00/each 400 2 Each Permanent barricade @ $400.00/each 800 100 Cu.yds. Select topsoil borrow @ $9.00/cu.yd. 900 2.0 Acres Seed w/fertilizer & mulch @ $730.00/Ac. 1,460 Total $ 67,350 +5% Contingencies 3,400 $,71,250 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 21,380 6393c D.) TOTAL STREET ................................... $ 92,630 6'P yffvF. V4 A. SANITARY SEWERa+ B. WATER 14AIN C. STORM SEWER D. STREET TOTAL ........................ Page 10. 29 7 $103,660 107,980 448,440 92,630 $752,710 • • APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEMAY LAKE IST ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 424 b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel A. SANITARY SEWER Total Description Footage Parcel Assessable LEMAY LAKE IST ADDN. Total Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment $ 2,818 LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDN. 459 F.F. $19.57/F.F. 8,983 Lot 1, 31ock 2 1,640 F.F. $33.77 $ 55,383 • NW 1/4, SECTION 10 Parcel 020-26 1,320 F.F. $33.77 44,577 Parcel 020-26 (Overdepth) 450 F.F. 8.22 3,700 2,960 F.F. $103,660 B. WATER MAIN a) Lateral Parcel Assessable Total Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDN. Lot 1, Block 1 405 F.F. $15.21 $ 6,159 Lot 1, Block 2 5,595 F.F. $15.21 85,092 • NW 1/4, SECTION 10 Parcel 020-26 1,100' $15.21 $ 16.729 7,100 F.F. $106,638 b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel Assessable Total Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment LEMAY LAKE IST ADDN. Lot 1, Block 1 144 F.F. $19.57/F.F. $ 2,818 Lot 1, Block 2 459 F.F. $19.57/F.F. 8,983 $ 11,E01 Page 11. 6393c 3q" C. STORM SEWER a) Lateral (LeMay Lake Area) Parcel Description LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDN. Lot 1, Block 2 Lot 1, Block 2 (Remove b Relay 48" RCP) NW 1/4, SECTION 10' Parcel 020-26 Assessable Total Footage Rate/L.F. Assessment 1,260 F.F. $45.14/L.F. $ 56,876 200 F.F. $68.25/L.F. 13,650 800 F.F. $45.14 36,112 $106,638 0 • Page 12. 6393c 7 b) Lateral (Eagandale Center Industrial Park) Parcel Total Description Area Rate/Sq.Ft. Assessment EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 1, Block 4 65,120 $0.0862 $ 5,616 Lot 2, Block 4 86,950 0.0862 7,499 Lot 3, Block 4 130,610 0.0862 11,265 Lot 4, Block 4 130,610 0.0862 11,265 Lot 5, Block 4 86,950 0.0862 7,499 Lot 6, Block 4 240,000 0.0862 20,699 Lot 7, Block 4 240,000 0.0862 20,699 Lot 14, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7,501 Lot 15, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7,501 Lot 16, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7.,501 Lot 17, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7,501' • Lot 18, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7,501 Lot 19, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7,501 Lot 8, Block 5 95,700 0.0862 8,,254 Lot 9, Block 5 78,300 0.0862 6,753 Lot 10, Block 5 78,300 0.0862 6,753 Lot 11, Block 5 78,300 0.0862 6,753 Lot 13, Block 5 275,740 0.0862 23,781 Lot 14, Block 5 348,400 0.0862 30;048 Lot 16, Block 5 179,030 0.0862 15,441 Lot 17, Block 5 84,070 0.0862 7,251 Lot 18, Block 5 88,430 0.0862 7,627 Lot 19, Block 5 87,120 0.0862 7,514 Lot 20 (200-05), Block 5 42,690 0.0862 3,682 Lot 1, Black 6 33,980 0.0862 2,931 Lot 2, Block 6 112,390 0.0862 9,693 Lot 3, Block 6 100,620 0.0862 8,678 Lot 4, Block 6 129,370 0.0862 11,157 • Lot 5, Block 6 82,760 0.0862 7,137 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 6 Lot 1, Block 1 91,040 $0.0862 $ 7,851 TOTAL 3,488,300 $300,852 Page 13. 6393c c) Trunk Area Parcel Area Description (Sq.ft.) LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Rate Lot 1, Block 1 37,800 Lot 1, Block 2 755,340 NW 1/4, SECTION 10 $0.072/sq.ft. Parcel 029-26 278,750 Parcel 020-26 80,500 Parcel 030-26 200,000 NE 1/4, SECTION 10 $0.061/sq.ft. Parcel 010-01 224,750 Parcel 010-01 30,500 Parcel 010-04 6,800 D. STREET Parcel Description LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2 NW 1/4. SECTION 10 Parcel 020-26 Assessable Credit Area Footage Total (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Rate Assessment -- 37,800 $0.072/sq.ft. $ 2,722 -- 755,340 $0.061/sq.ft. 46,076 -- 278,750 $0.072/sq.ft. 20,070 -- 80,500 $0.061/sq.ft. 4,991 -- 200,000 $0.061/sq.ft. 12,200 -- 224,750 $0.072/sq.ft. 16,182 -- 30,500 $0.061/sq.ft. 1,860 -- 6,800 $0.061/sq.ft. 415 • $104,100 Assessable Total Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment 405 $48.07 $ 19,468 972 48.07 46,724 550 48.07 26,438 1,927 $ 92,630 Page 14. 6393c 44/ • 0 SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Vater Main Storm Sever Lateral Lateral Lateral Eagan - Parcel Sanitary Benefit from LeMay dale Center Description Sewer Lateral Trunk Lake Area Ind. Park Trunk Street Assessment LEMAY LAKE IST ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 $ 6,159 S 2,818 S 2,722 S 19,468 $ 31,167 Lot 1, Block 2 $ 55,383 85,092 8,983 $ 70,526 46,076 46,724 312,784 EACANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARR Lot 1, Block 4 $ 5,616 $ 5,616 Lot 2, Block 4 7,499 7,499 Lot 3, Block 4 11,265 11,265 Lot 4, Block 4 11,265 11,265 Lot 5, Block 4 7,499 7,499 Lot 6, Block 4 20,699 20,699 Lot 7, Block 4 20,699 20,699 Lot 14, Block 4 7,501 7,501 Lot 15, Block 4 7,501 7,501 Lot 16, Block 4 7,501 7,501 Lot 17, Block 4 - 7,501 7,501 Lot 18, Block 4 - 7,501 7,501 Lot 19, Block 4 7,501 7,501 Lot 8, Block 5 8,254 8,254 Lot 9, Block 5 6,753 6,753 Lot 10, Block 5 6,753 6,753 Lot 11, Block 5 6,753 6,753 Lot 13, Block 5 23,781 23,781 Lot 14, Block 5 30,048 30,048 Lot 16, Block 5 15,441 15,441 Lot 17, Block 5 7,251 - 7,251 Lot 18, Block 5 7,627 7,627 Lot 19, Block 5 7,514 7,514 Lot 20 (200-05), Block 5 3,682 3,682 Lot 1, Block 6 2,981 2,981 Lot 2, Block 6 9,693 9,693 Lot 3, Block 6 8,678 8,678 Lot 4, Block 6 11,157 11,157 Lot 5, Block 6 7,137 7,137 EACANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK N0. 6 Lot 1, Block 1 _ S 7,851 $ 7,851 N4 1/4, SECTION 10 Parcel 020-26 S 48,277 S 16,729 $ 36,112 S 25,061 S 26,438 $152,617 Parcel 030-26 12,200 12,200 NE 1/4, SECTION 10 Parcel 010-01 _ $ 16,042 $ 18,042 Parcel 010-04 415 415 6393c P2 n 15. 7 LONE 4 :j 6 Ems O � O I, I J Sewer LaMAY LAKE •1st. ADDITION SANITARY SEWER PROJECT No.424 112 z Q W 8 9 .. (Co. �d. 26 1 Scale in feel 0 ICO 200' 300' 400 SONE®TIOO, ROSENZ, ANARL X I AE80CIATE% ipAC. Conoedling Engfne"o DOWMa►ch, 1995 city, GO=. 49341 J. EAGAN , MINN. 7 1 19 LONE OAM ROAD ~~ 4Y,� m LeMAY LAKE 1st ADDITION WATERMAIN PROJECT No.424 O I 8 9 (Co. d. 26 I 1 I 020-2.6 BONESTWOC. ROGENE, ,1VNDERLIX A ASSOCIATE®; INC.� Csn"ItIng inglv® St. Polul, Minn. ®6twMarch, 1985 City: Com. 49341 l EAGAN , MINN. Existin 16 Watermain 44 I I Ld- 2 �nrJ •. 1 . I n 8 3 Q 4 C 6 001 5 ?il la s ~~ 4Y,� m LeMAY LAKE 1st ADDITION WATERMAIN PROJECT No.424 O I 8 9 (Co. d. 26 I 1 I 020-2.6 BONESTWOC. ROGENE, ,1VNDERLIX A ASSOCIATE®; INC.� Csn"ItIng inglv® St. Polul, Minn. ®6twMarch, 1985 City: Com. 49341 l EAGAN , MINN. 7 19 I e 9 LONE OA ROAD i ( Co. o d. 25Lp) I 1 zO I FUl URE RM SEWER ` \ V UCTURE ml ----------il Yti 3 24 cn i 1 II lJ w 1 +� 4 OL Ld 020-26 0- ® I V j i a Z jJ i :`• RELOCATE Ex. _ j) 48"R.C.P. LeMAY. L' AKE 1 sf. ADDITION STORKSEWER PROJECT No.424 4&� IMMING RUCTURE 11�Stole in feet 0 I 0 200' X00' 400' 80NESTW00. R08EA/E. Al+lt9ERLIK A AGSOCiATES. INC. Comulting EngIrcows 8t. Potol Minn. ®8t0:March, 1985 City: COMM. 49341 EAGAN , MINN. 10 7 LONE OA 4. 71F __1 tj 3 12 5 �y 6 5 WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK O I LeMAY LACE 1 s4. ADDITION STREET PROJECT No.424 d,(;, 8 9 ( Co. �d. 26 ) i I I IL 020-26 IIv I ^r[ IJ IQ 11� 9, Scale In feet l 0 10 200. 3Q0 400 ®ONESTROO. iROSENE, ANDERUX. I AGGOCIATEE, INC. Consulting Englnoors Et. Paul Minn. loasna. to:March, 1985 City: 49341 11 EAGAN , FAWN. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Nineteen VACATION/LEMAY LAKE ADDITION B. Vacation of Street & Utility Easement (LeMay Lake Addition) -- The City Attorney's office was not able to publish the hearing notice in the legal newspaper to allow proper notification. Therefore, it is recommended that this item be continued until the April 16, 1985 City Council meeting. Provisions have been made with the LeMay Lake 1st Addition final plat to include the vacation of easements as a condition of final plat approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the vacation of street and utility easements for the LeMay Lake Addition • until the April 16, 1985 City Council meeting. • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty HOUSING REVENUE BONDS/KENSINGTON PLACE C. Multi -Family Housing Revenue Bond Application for the Kensington Place Project in the Amount of $16,000,000 - Consideration for the Kensington Place Multi -Family Housing Revenue Bonds in the amount of $16,000,000 was scheduled for the March 19 City Council meeting; however, due to the lack of appraisals, it was the recommendation of Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc., that the item be continued until the April 2 meeting. Enclosed is a letter from Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc., to the president of the Stuart Corpora- tion, representing the Kensington Place Project. (Page S/ ) Since that letter was written by Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc., Mr. Nolan has contacted Marcia Cohodes to indicate that their company is not in a position to move forward with an appraisal at this early date. Therefore, they are requesting a cancellation of the public hearing and a refund of the $500 deposit with the City. A copy of a letter from Miller & Schroeder indicating action is 'enclosed on page 57.- . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a withdrawal of the request for multi -family housing revenue bonds in the amount of $16,000,000 for the Kensington Place Project as requested by the Stuart Corporation. 1i Toll Free Mlnnesote (800) 862-6002 Toll Free Other States (800) 328-6122 Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center. 7900 Xerxes Avenue South. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55431 • (612) 831-1500 March 15, 1985 Mr. Stuart Nolan, President Stuart Corporation 2177 Youngman Avenue, Suite 300 St. Paul, Minnesota 55116 Re: $16,000,000 City of Eagan • Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond (Kensington Place Project) Dear Stu: I apologize for the misunderstanding concerning the need for an appraisal prior to Council consideration for Kensington. I had thought you were going to contact Joanne Hansin and authorize her to commence a preliminary review of the project's feasibility in order for us to proceed with the preparation of the documentation necessary to receive preliminary approval for Eagan. The council has adopted guidelines in approving Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds which includes a recommendation by Miller 8 Schroeder with respect to the appraised value of the.proposed project. The Council requires us to conduct a study with a `L?I appraiser which looks at the three recognized approaches to value: • I. The Market Data approach II. The Cost Approach III. The Income Approach The Council will approve not more than 80% of the MAI appraised value of the project. It will therefore be necessary for me to meet with an appraiser of your choosing in order to expedite this process. I have asked Tom Hedges, City Administrator, to request a continuance of the public hearing scheduled for Tuesday, 'larch 19, until a date to be established once `tiller 3 Schroeder has had adequate time to review the preliminary findings of the appraiser. Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, q&wa- Marcia A. Cohodes Assistant Vice President MAC/bjh MaadVuartn♦ Mmneapoln.Mmnesola Branch 011icee'. Co.morn •Minneepoln• So•!na'axh Caldornia• Norlhwook.11lmoi.•il.Paul.,M In %ow• neple..Flonda. Can on Cin.` ada 1-0 Toll Free Minnesota (600) 6626002 Toll Free Other States t600) 328-6122 Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center. 7900 Xerxes Avenue South. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 • (612) 831-1500 March 21, 1985 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan • 3820 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: $16,000,000 City of Eagan, Minnesota Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Kensington Place Project) Dear Mr. Hedges: Attached please find a copy of the letter I sent to Mr. Stuart Nolan, President of the Stuart Corporation, concerning the above referenced project. Mr. Nolan has since communicated to me that he is not in the position to move forward with an appraisal at this early date • and, therefore, is requesting cancellation of the public hearing and a refund of his $500 deposit with the City. Please call me at your earliest convenience in order that I may take care of this matter on behalf of the City. Very truly yours, MILLER & SCHROEDER MUNICIPALS, INC. a� Aa �11 ta� Marcia A. Cohodes Assistant Vice President MAC/pmh Enclosure cc: Stuart H. Nolan �Y Headquarters: Minneapolis, Minnesota Branch Offices: Dov tr Minneapolis -Solana Beach, California -Sarna Monica.California•Northbrook,Illinois•St.Paul.Minnesota•Naples,Florida•Tallahassee. Flanda•Carson City. Nevada • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One GALAXIE COURT ADDITION/PRELIMINARY PLAT/REZONING A. Galaxie Court, M.G. Astleford, for Preliminary Plat consisting of One Lot for 7 Warehouse/Storage Buildings and a Rezoning from R.B. to G.B. for 2.7 Acres' -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on February 28, 1985,- to consider two (2) applications - one for a rezoning from Roadside Business to General Business, and a second application to plat the Galaxie Court Addition allowing the construction of 7 warehouse storage buildings on 2.7 acres of land located southeast of I -35E and northwest of Galaxie Avenue. Both applications were continued until the March 26 meeting to allow the City staff to review concerns relating to site lines, other community's policies, and the affect that this development would have on development in the remainder of the area. The APC did hear the matter and is con- tinuing the preliminary plat and rezoning indefinitely allowing time for the M.G. Astleford Company to consider future land acquisition and a possible resubmittal of a larger master plan for commercial development in the general area of I -35E and Galaxie Avenue. Because this item is being continued indefinitely by the Advisory Planning Commission, it will be renoticed when the development plans are again presented to the City. Minutes of the APC meeting will be enclosed on Monday with the Administra- tive Packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON was no action taken by the therefore no action is required THIS ITEM: To acknowledge there Advisory Planning Commission and by the City Council. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two PRELIMINARY PLAT/REZONING/LIND ADDITION B. Lind Addition, M.G. Astleford, for Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot for 11 Warehouse/Storage Buildings and One Outlot and a Rezoning from R-4, Residential Multiple Family to P.D., Planned Development, for 8.5 Acres Located in Section 16 -- A public hearing was first held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on February 28, 1985, to consider applications for a rezoning from R-4 to P.D. and a preliminary plat for the Lind Addition consisting of one lot for 11 warehouse buildings and one outlot on 8.5 acres. The APC continued the item until the March 26, 1985, APC meeting and after hearing the matter, is recommending denial to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to a report that was prepared by the Planning ,Department found on pages through 6�(o . For additional information as it relates to the action taken by the APC, a copy of those minutes will be made available on Monday as a part of the Administrative Packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC for denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning for Lind Addition. SPECIAL, NOTE: A phone call from Ray Williams of M. was received this afternoon, March 29. Mr. Williams a continuance of the above :item. The Council has the continue the item or to consider the item as scheduled. 4 ;L G. Astleford is requesting discretion to • E CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: LIND ADDITION — PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING APPLICANT: M.G. ASTLEFORD LOCATION: PART OF THE NE'y OF SECTION 16 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI—FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 28, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 15, 1985 REPORTED BY: GREG INGRAHAM, ASST. PLANNER REVIEWED BY: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval of the Lind Addition consisting of 1 lot for 11 warehouse/ storage buildings and 1' outlot on 8.5 acres. The project would be located between Federal Dr. .& I -35E i mile south of Yankee Doodle Rd. The Rezoning request is to change from R-4 (residential'multiple)to`P.D. (planned development). ZONING & LAND USE: The parcel is zoned R-4 and the Land Use Guide Plan design— ates it as residential with a density of 3 — 6 units per acre. The triangular site is bordered by offices to the north, Royal Oak Circle Apartments are planned across Federal Dr. and I -35E lies to the east. The parcel is relatively flat grassland with a steep slope down to the I -35E right—of—way. The Planned Development would have a limited business use on the outlot and the mini storage use on Lot 1. CODE COMPLIANCE: The 11, storage buildings (39,100 S.F.) cover 26% of the site. They meet all the setback requirementsfrom Federal Dr. and I -35E. SITE PLANNING: Access is off of Federal Dr. directly across from the Royal Oaks Circle future driveway. Six of the storage buildings would be two story and five would be one story. The exterior construction is textured concrete Panels and concrete block. An on site manager would live on the premises in an apartment in building #1. Some landscaping is indicated on the site plan, the amount of screening should be increased on the final landscape plan. The site would be fenced with a 6' high chain link security fence. LIND ADDITION FEBRUARY 28, 1985 PAGE 2 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The existing topography is slightly rolling with the site sloping from north to south. This development is located within Major Drainage District J. Runoff from this development will collect in a small detention pond built by MnDOT across from Violet Lane. From here it will be discharged through a controlled outlet into MnDOT right-of-way and drained through the roadside ditch for I -35E down to Pond JP -5. This pond does have a positive gravity outlet to Blackhawk Lake. It is proposed to grade this development to maintain the existing drainage pattern, that being from north to south. The grading as proposed will probably preclude any future access from this site from Outlot A. The necessity of this access will be further discussed under the paragraph entitled "STREETS". The reason a future connection will. probably not be feasible with this grading plan is that this plan is lowering the north end of this lot appoximately 10 ft., while leaving the southern portion of Outlot A at existing grades. It does not appear likely that Outlot A will be lowered significantly. This is because the elevation rises to the north on Outlot A. The proposed drainage over this development is to be southerly and collected • in catch basins at the south end of this development. Staff would recommend that three catch basins be installed at the south end to pick up the runoff rather than the two as proposed. Staff feels, in reviewing this site, that a minimum of three catch basins will be required to accomodate the volume of runoff generated by the vast amount of impervious surface created by this development. This drainage would then be discharged into MnDOT's detention pond that .is immediately south of this development. However, staff recommends -this grading and drainage plan be reviewed by MnDOT and that written comments be received regarding this drainage scheme prior to final plat approval. In addition, the steep slopes resulting from grading along the east -west property line measuring 148 ft. could be reduced. This can be accomplished by requiring this developer obtain a permit from MnDOT to grade within MnDOT right-of-way. . Staff would strongly recommend this permit be pursued as a condition of final plat approval. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth exist • within Englert Road that will' provide 'future service to this proposed develop- ment. However, it will 'have ' to be extended northerly. Also, a watermain of sufficient size, capacityand depth exists within Federal Drive just north of Outlot A. This will have to be extended southerly and the crossing of Federal Drive will have to be made along with the sanitary sewer crossing. It is staff's understanding that this development is anticipating scheduling utility construction with the proposed Royal Oak Apartment development. The Royal Oak development will also require sanitary sewer being brought northerly from Englert Road and watermain being brought southerly from Federal Drive. Because Federal Drive is the only access to the Blackhawk Hills Additions, staff is recommending that all utility crossings required for this development be jacked and not open -cut. In addition, this will maintain the integrity of a newly constructed street. STREETS: Federal Drive is the only existing street which abutts this proposed development on this development's westerly boundary. Federal Drive was constructed by MnDOT as a part of the I -35E construction in the summer of 1Z LIND ADDITION FEBRUARY 28, 1985 PAGE 3 1984. From Violet Lane to Washington Avenue, it is constructed 44 ft. wide as a 9 -ton street. This development will not require any public streets at this time. As discussed under "GRADING/DRAINAGE", a connection between this lot and Outlot A appears highly unlikely due to the grading. However, staff is not convinced a connection is necessary due to the proposed use. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Right-of-way has been obtained by MnDOT for the construction of Federal Drive. No other right-of-way will be required to be dedicated with this development. Easements of sufficient, width shall be dedicated on the final plat for all utilities not located within public right-of-way. These widths shall be determined by the Engineering Department. ASSESSMENTS: Although our records indicate this parcel proposed to be developed • has been assessed for trunk area watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer, they were not assessed at the proposed commercial/industrial zoning rate. Instead, trunk area watermain was assessed at the residential zoning rate. The trunk area sanitary sewer rates are the same for all zonings. Subsequently, in accordance with the City's special assessment policy 82-1, the difference between the proposed zoning rates and previously assessed zoning rates in the year that final plat approval is received is the responsibility of this development. These assessment amounts are summarized in the following table. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE ESTIMATED 1985 RATE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DIFFERENCE - AMOUNT Trunk Area Watermain - 3.4 Ac. $1,830/Ac. $6,222 Trunk Area Storm Sewer 148,100 s.f. 0.011/s.f. 1,629 • TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT UPGRADING DUE $7,851 Final assessments amounts will be determined using final plat areas and rates in effect at the time of final platting. These assessments are due at the time of final' platting. They will either be paid in full or spread by an executed waiver of hearing over a 15 -year period at the interest rate of the City's latest bond sale. CONDITIONS If approved, the plat shall be subJect to the following conditions: 1) A provision of the approval would be to allow an on-site residence for the caretaker. 2) The standard plat conditions and- applicable City ordinances shall be adhered to. 3) A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into between the applicant and the City with the term of the P.D. being 5 years. $7 LIND ADDITION FEBRUARY 28, 1985 PAGE 4 4) No slopes be allowed within this development steeper than 3:1. 5) Written comments from MnDOT regarding the proposed grading and drainage of this development shall be received prior to final plat approval. 6) A public improvement project for utility installation to provide service to this development shall be approved by Council prior to final plat approval. 7) Open -cutting of_ Federal Drive for the installation of utilities not be allowed. 8) This development shall be responsible. for upgrading trunk area watermain and storm sewer assessments based on rates in effect at the time of final platting. • 9) This development shall be responsible for all costs associated with providing lateral utilities to this development. R_4 NB ji 'rd RD E N 5 G B G87- RB NcmNvt"2 Z D -0 H T� IST ; P D —13;-u4 csc L..B' I JV II LROE 81-3 AIL aLACKHAWK PARK PK PILOT CENT R R, A FF OL o44. CITY K HALL PF 77-2 A SKDA4E NO R-1 S _J<OVDALE TP NEUMANN 6A 'A N FOX EPP A R 10 G rE I R_4 NB ji 'rd RD E N 5 G B G87- RB NcmNvt"2 Z D -0 H T� IST ; P D —13;-u4 csc L..B' I JV II LROE 81-3 AIL aLACKHAWK PARK PK PILOT CENT R R, A FF OL o44. CITY K HALL PF 77-2 A SKDA4E NO R-1 S _J<OVDALE TP NEUMANN 0 • EXISTING ZONING I EXISTING ZONING, LOCATION MAP q R-4 PD75-3 Z PROPOSED ZONING ��.'� �( �' sin II i w PO I In Y 4J ¢ .� _ OUTLOT A Ac. w I3.1 .I h Ir I �pC''.GC I,III, �I'lll�iI 1 ;' �• 'Ilhllll �l� !0{5m tiO I ---�}•---n" DESCRIPTION � EXISTING ZONING °J 01 "C' / R-4 I / / LOT t F PROPOSED ZONING / �.•„��..� j �O^I � � s PD y/ s / onr r-es.n I FF /EXISTING ZONING •r^'r'°^• ! rat. Wed / `lee EXISTING ZONING LEDmr A 0 PROPOSED ROYAL OAK CIRCLE L ()<b 19- r cp 2m, q 10 0 ic mossullsiono's • a V23? LIND AD - DITION James R. Hill, inc PLANNERS / ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS M.G. ASTLEFOAV PRELIMINARY PLAN & LANDSCAPING 11 LOCATION MAP w all y lh : A ! / r r��l�i� z z _ �A r III I��' / u_ Y`� /•"b DESCRIPTION _ 9 jr�ijl ; M f : l / / / V•W1�'A.:�1i 7� 1 ✓ /� �N' M 1 JA y 7 1 1• 1 1 1'�1 ]� 7: Ot OBY r, Q i I�Ir 1 E L� Y� SITE DATA G� Q: c97 `: IL .J 1 . cwc cwc .. t N I � L GEN^n � an+. —_— `I 1 A01 t. .0 NIRET LYE I ve. LYt.� d f 7 ---L Y eno I II I OUTLOT A m i.. LOTI ELK I O O M / F' E] I DESCRIPTION aYN �Y•O'M' WR LOCATION MAP "mm�z 4%"' UTILITIES LEGEND nv.•.Yn.., um ..ewu• i w 1..�.... Y•rou• ••ru ••. .ti ..N Y•R• .Y•O SITE DATA m r 77: C7: N I 11111114.4-11A.1 ILI III 1111111 Hit 0 If I I I I T Tf i T T fTI-T-rf I. I TT*Tt:T i I f Tf MITI M Tf F-11 i milt MONTH! Alt RE I I IT -n. all I .!..I j i I U H rff�� 7-j \ 4, 4AIIII I.; q 1-.31N C(111111 iTT 1 T A TIT MUTT Tit 4 Im �jj "J." 1, RT16- , IT TTTT-' frITT111MIT IL I 11111114.4-11A.1 ILI III 1111111 Hit 0 If I I I I T Tf i T T fTI-T-rf I. I TT*Tt:T i I f Tf MITI M Tf F-11 i milt MONTH! Alt RE I I IT -n. all I .!..I j i I U H rff�� 7-j \ 4, 4AIIII I.; q 1-.31N C(111111 iTT 1 T A TIT MUTT Tit 4 Im �jj "J." E 01 8)3.0 oeo5` 1 815.9 \\COY 0_0 - -10 7900" =]� _i:Fe.{-, - DP -4 1 N 802.0 - .':1�. ._-�BPq 96 874 a L5.- P-T-CP=2 =- - 30 C -n Bl�• .-B79.B._, IE 5.0 821.5 69.4. I ./ 829.) 'S' 24- _.-":-•. `rEnTw:v� - Q DP -20 I /'.. - 0 �_iGMS a00. - 901 0 "I DP -23 ._�-9042 _ g'+ 879.6 .� 823-0 •e \.: 1. _ 2 d96 �n•. r•.ar naaK B29J D cIF V}� 1 790.7 _ DP -22 ..-� 806.0 "'-JP-66� 8900 1 \ \'o. .-./ _ - 8710 `3922 Z . ` CP -11 G2. JP 3 - 1'_ ej1fi7 dR-❑ JP•65 7950-I JP -2 12 Bait -o 880.0 869.0 8887 .. 1. ....'.. ,� 808./ 844 0 .: ... 17.6 .9013 1651.5 O �1 t. J-,-JP-47 J-0 SO& ` 800.0 .-_..��.� cr 8"o 8492 802,5 -- 1 04. _ =e J'e _ 12. 24- BP -I ` 846.5 .' 7903 - -- _- 8300- 80/0 JP -5 8238 ,J-°- 8340 _ 792 3 801.6 JP -10 8208 P-29 8300 809 ] B/8.0 ' 8-0 BP -28 .88 B9 300 .- BP -33 �e d6B0 ` - JP -49 e >'� 8860 48' 8 "3w C<:E - 8300 P-7' a -r 895.2 =�-''� - -_ 8706 JP -35 JP- 7 8300 .. = EP -3 99 s. }2�a, 872.4 9652 - -„ 903.2 jVU�, 12 «4 0 ]I 9202 5J �P-37JB,ap 3• B -9 i ___ __ _ 872.0SP-4 - Z / BP 4 (875.0 874 5 92.BJOO -a ' 0 8742 927 0 9212 886.5 882. LP -63 _ 8860 a550 V .o _ �•2J.._-_12' .90p 8 Y 918.0 BP -S --r i9ID _ 923.2 996.5 i':--- LP -4o4 91828 -- - � O.:�B:-0 1a:.. BP -17I .._G;ti: 853.2.:_ L85i.1 910.1 BP -23 I _ � > ' "• i J882o I i _ NLP 42 •^- 1- ;,-. SP -9 .n 9j2j ,BP -IB -. W �il 1 Oh 911.3 R 8920: L -a _ '•'_]Ear �:; _ i �.R(9.6•. a< BP_6 s'B_E:clrrs .-.:.- ._�; city of eagan approved:rF #�STORM S WER.PUBLIC woRKsMASTER PLAN . 1 DEPARTMEN .rn•.EE b 1--� DOODLE I .. -. - 5 ti 1 - 43� 502 wef 04 Eo• zv - _ ..:n I10•-' - wel ro �.-_— 16 39- PNMOPHOUSEE 296 1 W �5 434/ o (503 �� yr•.—•,�� ° 435—/__-.-. ( g� r 53 j -- 1 ] 507 506 FUTME °.1LN I.E.1q MT .� 436 .1" FACILITY 43 ds� 509- e- . e °� 39 509 96 /° o ix E 3 / 406 ' 397 4FIGURE 2 -�zORKS 0 zGMAGE ; 103 4FIGURE 2 Agenda Information April 2, 1985 City Page Twenty -Three Memo Council Meeting FINAL RESOLUTION/LEMAY LAKE PROJECT C. Final Resolution for LeMay Lake Apartments Project Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds in the Amount of $12,500,000 -- The Healey- Ramme Company has made application through the City's program administrator, Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc., to have consideration to the final resolution for the LeMay Lake Project multifamily housing revenue bonds in the amount of $12,500,000. All the documentation is in order for consideration. If the City Council desires any additional information on this project, please feel free to contact this office at any time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the final resolution for the LeMay Lake Apartments Project multifamily housing revenue bonds in the amount of $12,500,000. KEYLAND HOMES FOR A VARIANCE D. Keyland Homes for a One -Foot Variance from the Ten -Foot, Sideyard Setback Requirement for Lot 2, Block 2, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition --An application was received from Keyland Homes requesting a variance of 1 -foot for a sideyard setback .on a home that is under construction at 1898 Bear Path Trail. Enclosed on pages through is a brief review by the Planning Department an a map locatin subject lot and defining the variance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1 -foot variance to Keyland Homes. /_ 7 To approve or deny the CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: KEYLAND HOMES LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 2, SUNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: P.D. - .EAGAN HILLS WEST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 2, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 22, 1985 REPORTED BY: GREG H INGRAHAM, ASST. PLANNER REVIEWED BY: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER PROPOSAL SUMMARY: Due to an alteration during construction of a house that is located at 1898 Bear Path Trail, the house ended up 9" within the 10' sideyard setback area. The home builder wishes to clear up this mistake by obtaining a 1' variance from the City. The onlyalternative to the variance would be the acquisition of a 1' strip of land from the adjacent lot. If approved, the variance shall be subject to all applicable City ordinances and requirements. ■ Z FOR: C. R. WINDEN S ASSOCIATES; INC. LAND SURVEYORS Tel 645-3646 1381 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 55106 KEY -LAND HOMES �. Q Scale: 1" = 30' s Denotes Iron Monument J 22 N i / ni e - °m e %g98 _M Q, V 2 9err d / 42 r Ino !' S1otv,,�v s�ercLc, "V SS 0 h. 30.86 589`30'31"yy Lot 2, Block 2, SUN CLIFF SECOND ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON, AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. Dated this 60% day of A.D. I98r C. R. WIINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. House LOcniC._ rl-'.QrGF I, ISS_ by Surveyor, Minnesota Registration No. 7726 I�-z2 � /07 Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four PARKCLIFF DEVELOPMENT - FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE E. Parkcliff Development for a Ten -Foot Variance from the Thirty - Foot Frontyard Setback Requirement for Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4, Block 1, Parkcliff 3rd Addition --An application was received from Parkcliff Development Inc., requesting a 10 -foot variance from the 30 -foot front setback requirement for Lots 1 through 4, Block 1, of Parkcliff 3rd Addition. The reason for the variance request is to allow more flexibility in dealing with the steep slope and existing trees in the rear yards of these lots. For additional information on this item, refer to pagesthrough 73 that includes a copy of the City Planner's brief report is and a location map indicating the subject parcels and variance request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the 10 -foot frontyard setback variance requested by Parkcliff Devel- opment Inc. 7U • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: PARKCLI.FF DEVELOPMENT, INC. LOCATION: LOTS 1, 2, 3 & 4, BLOCK 1, PARKCLIFF 3RD ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 2, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: .MARCH 22, 1985 REPORTED'BY: GREG H INGRAHAM, ASST. PLANNER REVIEWED BY: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is asking for a 10' variance from the 30' front setback requirement for Lots 1 - 4, block 1, of Parkcliff 3rd Addition. The reason for the variance request is to allow more flexibility iq dealing with the steep slope and existing trees in the rear yards of these lots. If approved, the variance shall City ordinances and requirements. %/ be subject to all applicable PARK CLIFF 3RD ADDITION ADDRESSES .. ZO - FOITYAW 5E TBV -K ,e f gUESTEI7, L rs 1-4 !11\ In R P1 uP.Y.I .Pw yylSf OIN...11 µo\. nu1�uHP i� ui v♦II\\~OV N..`�N\VA. ..DIY 1NMfO P�i�naP \C\�VY�1 �N P V{ 1.11\ -•-...ypn\i.1P PMRN010 CVp. te�1. VILIHn1 Mx/ i e omctSIx0 COY/AMY, Ixt. r ,SHEET 2 O/ 2 SHEETS • PARKCLIFF 3 RD ADDITION ...IYllnr IMIY1111 \w � )MPRN4r INC. .00 un ,... unn om.u. vmt.e.. nnr w EROSION CONTROL PLAN PARKCLIFF 3 RD ADDITION .ull.......,...1 .. �. wmuru uv.o mw e. nuw ow y 1M PARKCLIFF Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five WAIVER OF PLAT/ART PERRI F. Art Perri for Waiver of Plat for Lot 1, Block 2, Oak Chase 1st Addition --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on March 28, 1985, to consider a waiver of plat application submitted by Art Perri to split the 1.6 acre parcel into two lots. The APC is recommend- ing approval of the item to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to the City Planner's report a copy is enclosed on pages_ Z�� through7 For action � that was taken by the Advi ory Planning Commission, refer to a copy of those minutes which will appear as a part of the Admin- istrative packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for Art Perri, Lot 1, Block 2, Oak Chase 1st Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: ART PERRI LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 2 OAK CHASE 1st ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: E — ESTATE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 28, 1985 " DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 21, 1985 REPORTED BY:' GREG H. INGRAHAM, ASSISTANT PLANNER REVIEWED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER • PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting a waiver of the platting require— ments in order to split the 1.6 acre parcel into 2 lots. The existing house is located on proposed parcel "A" which would be approximaely 40,000 square feet in area. Parcel "B" would be approximately 30,000 square feet. City Code requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet in this zone. The original large size of Lot 1, Block 2 was due to a low area north of the current home location. This lot division should split that low area between the two parcels. If approved the Waiver of Plat shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. All City ordinances and requirements shall be adhered to. ---------------- 7- K n!j, OAK CHASE�F � PARK 3,PKE 72 1A ISV- -7 1 A P\ A JA PF �9th' ! s >>., PF I I A I R PF Lj- - - PARKVIEW GOLF COURSE DA KO TA COUN i Y A PARK EXCEPTil"N R-1 PK (f -J07 INCL'JCCEU C:;o A i A PARK) PF cc R-1 LJ LLi I DLACE PD 75-1 ---------------- 7- K n!j, OAK CHASE�F � PARK 3,PKE 72 1A ISV- -7 1 A P\ A JA PF �9th' ! s >>., PF I I A I R PF Lj- - - PARKVIEW GOLF COURSE DA KO TA COUN i Y A PARK EXCEPTil"N R-1 PK (f -J07 INCL'JCCEU C:;o A i A PARK) 'TRI -LAND INC. Certificate of Survey for SURVEYING SERVICES ART PERRL Eagan, Minnesota 55121 N 1"=50' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ✓ARCEL ; „ii Dat cart of Lot 1, Biock 2, Gek C,iase First Addition, Lying 5outheriy or she ;`otiowiino dine: Said iine b,2oins at a ^oint on the West iine e5 said Lot 1 distant 222.ir. reec North of the sotheasc corner rr;' said Lot 1; thence Scut" 73 decree 29 mutes i+ seconds East 212.50 feet ,to .he West line or said Lotij and there terminating. PARCH "B° Nil that part of Lot 1, Bicck 2, Oak Chase Firsc Additipn, Lying Northeriy of':he foiiowing described line: Said line bogins at a point onl the West line or. said Lot 1 distant 222.16 feet North of the southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence South 73 degrees 29 Minutes 1f. seconds East 212.50 feat to the west line of said Lot 1 and there terminating 4 Y a 0 De ` 119 84 Cly 31° 39' 3q„ �F iygl✓ �� SS e°9y, Syo F 0 0 _ v' O,To oc, N N 0.90 ac. N89° 35'37E 180.00 f?, 0 0 0 N1 7 A. O 0 0 Q ie I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a�� Bradley wenson Mn. Reg No. 15235 duly. Registered Land Surveyor under the pate' 3/3, Laws of the State of Minnesota. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six REVISE PRELIMINARY PLAT/FOREST RIDGE G. Forest Ridge for Revised Preliminary Plat, Dan Gustafson, Consisting of Approximately 20.02 Acres and Containing 17 Lots from Multiple Development --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on March 26, 1985, to consider a revised preliminary plat entitled Forest Ridge consisting of approximately 20.02 Acres and containing 17 lots for multiple development. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the revised preliminary plat as presented. For additional information on this item, refer to a report that was prepared by the Engineering and Planning Depart- ments entitled Forest Ridge Revised Preliminary Plat. This • report is enclosed on pages through �_ For additional information regarding the action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, a copy of those minutes will be supplied with the Administrative Agenda on Monday, April 1. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the revised preliminary plat for the Forest Ridge project. F1 -70 Is CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: FOREST RIDGE REVISED, PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: FOREST RIDGE PARTNERSHIP, DAN GUSTAFSON LOCATION: PART OF THE SE'g OF THE NW'y, SECTION 15 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 26, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 18,'1985 REPORTED BY: ENGINEERING & PLANNING DEPARTMENTS • APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a revision to the Forest Ridge Preliminary Plat consisting of approx. 20.02 acres and containing 17 lots for multiple development. COMMENTS: As you may recall, the original PP consisted of 2 types of multiple units. The larger were 54 unit buildings which had garages attached to each end. 'These buildings are similar to buildings which have been constructed in Surrey Gardens on Yankee Doodle Rd. The second type of unit proposed, were more of a townhouse or split entry, multiple unit with the garage being on the middle floor of the unit. Since the approval of the original plat, there were many trade offs and changes from the original design which were made by the Commission and Council. Since this final approval the applicants have been studying the site and trying to work the most feasible way to develop the site. Noting that a substantial amount of grading would have to be completed for the 54 units buildings, the applicants have decided to change their design to have more of the townhouse type of apartment with underground parking and • 3 stories above, such as the units that were approved for Blackhawk Townhouse Apartments. Therefore, the applicant is able to fit the unit into the topography versus what was originally proposed for the development plan. The issues which would most affect the residents to the east is to how this revised development would- impact this adjacent neighborhood. The first 2 buildings have as greater setback than what was originally proposed. Also, the access and circulation would be further from the property to the east. It appears the scale of buildings is reduced by creating a number of smaller buildings rather than the larger row buildings which were originally proposed. Hopefully, the designs being proposed have all been positive in aesthetics and site planning in order to create a better relationship than what was origin— ally approved. The access to this development would now be served by one private drive from Duckwood, looping out to Denmark Av and private drives circulating from the interior street as well as from Denmark Av. There are only two curb cuts on Denmark to provide circulation to this development. However, there are opportunities where additional connections could be made if required by the City for better circulation. 77 PRELIMINARY PLAT, FOREST RIDGE MARCH 26, 1985 PAGE 2 The applicant is still keeping 252 units, which were the number approved in the original plan, however, design is the major reason for this revised plat. This design will hopefully better this development and also reduce the lot coverage. All along the east property, it appears that this design provides either greater setbacks or preserves the natural topography: The mass of the structure, has been reduced blending the smaller units more effectively with the property to the east. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The existing topography for this development consists largely of rolling grassland with hills and depressions. As can be seen from Figure 1, this development is located within two maior drainage districts. Approximately the southern one-fourth of this development is located within Major Drainage District J. This maior drainage district has gravity flow to the Minnesota River. The remaining three-fourths of this development is located within Maior Drainage District D. Run-off within this area is collected into a depression shown as Pond DP -22 on Figure 1. Although no positive outlet for this pond is in place, Protect 429 (Town Centre 70 & 100 - streets and utilities) will be providing the necessary outlet to this pond along with a required storm sewer to make the connection to Pond DP -4. Under the previous proposal in August of 1984, this development would have been responsible for the acquisition of a portion of the ponding easement necessary for Pond DP -4 that is located on the Robert O'Neil property. However, this revised layout allows Pond DP -22 to increase its storage volume to _limit the outflow from this pond to 2 CFS. Subsequently, storm water from this development will not impact the storage area required for easement for Pond DP -4. This proposed development will require the City to install a control outlet from Pond DP -22 and also to extend an existing storm sewer from the Duckwood Estates development to the normal water level for Pond DP -22. Costs for these improvements will be the responsibility of the City's trunk storm sewer fund. SANITARY SEWER: This development will require extension of a 12" trunk sanitary sewer line from the intersection of Duckwood Drive and Denmark Avenue as illustrated in Figure 2. This extension is being covered under Project 429. This trunk storm sewer will also accomodate the Town Centre 70 and a portion of the Town Centre 100 developments. This development will be responsible for constructing all lateral sanitary sewers to provide service within this development. An 8" sanitary sewer is in place within Duckwood Drive at a depth and capacity to service this proposed development. WATERMAIN: A 24" watermain is located within Duckwood Drive and a 12" watermain is located within Denmark Avenue. Both lines terminate at the Denmark/Duckwood intersection. These mains are of sufficient capacity to provide the necessary water service to this development. As you can see from Figure 3, no trunk watermain extensions will be required by this development. PRELIMINARY PLAT, FOREST RIDGE MARCH 26, 1985 PAGE 3 STREETS: The existing street bordering this development on its southerly boundary is Duckwood Drive. Duckwood Drive is designated as a City collector street and is built to its ultimate design section, that being a 44 -ft. wide, 9 -ton bituminous paved roadway with concrete curb and gutter. This development will require the extension of Denmark Avenue north of Duckwood Drive. This will be accomplished under Proiect 429. Because Denmark Avenue is classified as a City community collector street, it will require that a 6 -ft. concrete sidewalk be constructed along the east side of Denmark Avenue. This sidewalk will be the responsibility of this development. Staff has no objection with the proposed accesses along Denmark Avenue. Staff feels that any proposed accesses for the Town Centre 70 pro+ect can • be relocated to line up with these accesses because the Town Centre 70 accesses are basically for employee parking and deliveries. Subsequently, the shift of these entrances to line up with the Forest Ridge entrances should not cause any significant problems. The proposed access onto Duckwood Drive from this development is approximately 360 ft.. east of the center line of Denmark Avenue, while Crossroad Court is located approximately 400 ft. east of the center line of Denmark Avenue. This results in a 40-f t. off -set between the proposed private street and Crossroad Court, a publicly dedicated street. According to the City Code, public streets shall not have less than 125 -ft. offsets, and private street intersections with publicly dedicated streets shall have a minimum 180-f r. offset. However, there is no classification for intersections where private drives and public streets meet, as is the case with this proposed development. But, in either case, the 40 -ft. offset is definitely less than either of the offsets allowed by code. Therefore, staff recommends the proposed • private drive at Duckwood Drive be shifted easterly to align with the Crossroad Court intersection. Staff feels this is feasible and can be accomplished with a minimum of inconvenience to the developer. The internal private streets shall be constructed in accordance with City Code. Staff recommends that minimum separation between units, based on code, be 74 feet. This results from a 25 -ft. setback for each row of units plus a 24 -ft. driving lane. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: As a condition of final platting, this development shall dedicate a 40 -ft. half right-of-way for Duckwood Drive and a 40 -ft. half right-of-way for Denmark Drive. Easements shall be dedicated as required by City Code. Utility easements of sufficient widths will be required to be dedicated over any public utilities constructed within this development. A ponding and drainage easement will be required to be dedicated encompassing the high water elevation for Pond DP -22. a PRELIMINARY PLAT, FOREST RIDGE MARCH 26, 1985 PAGE 4 ASSESSMENTS: The special assessments this development is responsible for were highlighted in the August, 1984, Engineering Report. Therefore, only the Assessment Summary Table is included with this report. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 1985 RATE AMOUNT Trunk Area Storm Sewer 696,960 SF(1) $0.061/SF $42,515 Upgrading Street Assessment 620 FF 28.47/FF(2) 17,651 (Residential to Multiple) - TOTAL ..................... $60,166 • (1)Includes 20% public R/W and ponding easement credit. (2)Multiple ($60.92) - Residential ($32.45) CONDITIONS: If approved, this platshould be subject to the same conditions that were imposed on the original development. . 1. Proiect 429 (Town Centre 70 & 100 - street & utility improvements) shall be authorized for construction prior to final plat approval. The private • street entrance on Duckwood Drive shall be shifted easterly to line up with Crossroad Court. 2. A minimum separation between townhomes located opposite each other along private drives shall be 74 feet. 3. A 40 -ft. half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Duckwood Drive and Denmark Avenue. 4. A ponding easement encompassing the high water elevation for Pond DP -22 shall be dedicated on the final plat. 5. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessment and the upgrading of the street assessment for .Duckwood Drive at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 6. This development shall be responsible for its share of the cost for the improvement of Denmark Avenue with streets and utilities and all costs for the internal public utilities. G3, A A -T- PD 83-0 A. S C -7 82-2 GARD'P��S' GB_ ffRB CSC C p HTS -2 A- 82 !-R ice, 75-2f( CS1 pi EN .. R 2- ........ R R A ��; -.Z, Sl I A A N R -- A IL - A R 14Tr IF t -A IF. `ITY �iALL . cr, K, 4 (V&_ PD Ivy$ `i Y. PF 77-2 q A �S:KQVDALE PK 6-1 p R I jKOVC-ALt ci PF', -I BERRY FATCH- co -:EU,'AANN PARK g. I / I 'ES'.?.TES � Ic ♦ / R / I .. I I I a FY.C..:US ui �I OG3 4 ...... 8.... 7 ` .no ..ao m.•.. 8 e I - - 2 13 12 ..:..r 17 I i� .. I I I / O I 10 O 15 14 ..r.. � / 9 3 ... U I it I I + + + DENMARK AVENUE + ` ------ --- -----I I- LAND USE SUMMARY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION I I I L1 - uiul.. mxn •-. r.. aLr o..... \r .1 r.• mm....I own. o. r.. .°rano E•••. •" °Y.nur.r.n, ruou man r, nx.um. I PARKING I rumr q v.n• M• sumo. m hr I hl .er.r.rne I.en...l )RE FOREST RIDGE OF EAGAN ""°""'°'°" ^ �• •'�.�-��' FOREST RIDGE �- GINEERIN6 - '•' •••• ^^ .OMPRNY INC. PRELIMINARY PLAT :r PARTNERSHIP 1. IIUO..unln4l. ru.IM1. U4r .w .0-.°00 w••4Yx• �� • x.ne.. .mu. FOREST RIDGE I�ytuX Wcav &sspres —l --*,p lot -Li 07 I �IIir�1 � � IIII:.I.Z ��:.. II.54 I... � UNIT uN r NI U - I axir G G 1. -- --- ---- -- a Z o IOD' ub f' ruf®.�4, I MT- =-. -17`1 m-= - - =m - - ra -��n--1-7-= _ MI F�1 -_ - if- f=�nlrj lm - . - m = II 1 M N'•Yw' I'uU1-:IIS wer � I � Ii w4 w." Wq wI.J i I w•, J•W' . J -A is M RW KI iowA � j 14 Glq wvwvw —' 1 67 N -B I ;j —,`:; v 1 2 RE55--' / il[slHGTOY 'Sp!�— O 15 681, Uri, 9 FO. I 1i N -E w,oGEl I N- V I N- U J _l 12u 0... I _ C -H2 31 — - 3 '6 MI5 C-00 " n C -NN HiE q - o r-- I n I snuvoaLE �r,. 61 �I 33 HJ ] C -i .rr ✓ C - P P t FOREST RIDGE SUBJECT PARCEL • FIG. *2 pity of eagan SANITARY SEWER approved= p PUBLIC late #d - WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT / V u /7Bo(`9� 36 35 34 -°- 12•''/26..,-..,,16" 23 122 ... 239 12•.u„ ,.347/540,:,�J / ,� @30 1 16" I] 12 5'_�CUI ::._� I�nCoR� ... 121: \1 INLNG:�ic d:-c� 492/)40 _- 12• 120. .�.. h: ! P1LQB 1B• `•% l\ l' �_� #0 - A' V71 2- 720/72 is 0.r 5.7/52.0 12,'•. _ 52 0s0 .IQI,v'.:^� 16" 590 45 ® 4]T/94p /640, 5J2 _ \CL`:'AV:3�. I _ _. _ 51.2 ELEVATED Si0R40E '`` ` KE ' 0 S F -,^,5'y. 50 1 ,39.5/1170 640/610 N.W.L. 1059 _-'^��-�� SERVICE 51 :vp'ny�pa'. 1'458,680 12• "&04 T2 I_•uNGiC,45�� •43/750 i_ 9• ]7 69.]/Bap 551/720.2• _ 20'612/90579/730 1419/60000" fi® 00 „ I )e TREATM NT1 68/640 PLANT SITE. - 02Y00,)1 -•cBal - '�J -_'•VR 636/721 01 _ 6” /92.0 la ;+,;15fi 2/67Oai, _•:p —__ :CIY.LN 1 55.3/700 603/751L'T X. •= 1:' ' .x 1 -_681/63,0 102 103 aw A- -30" 444.4�44�4�4�4�4� 30" ._YiG`1 •.ta •• ].Oe•y" IID 453/600 1 _ 84,7/98 _ _ 0 0 04 8Y.!'m 1• 13 5].0/690 /_ ... _ ._ 591/750 107, ' ::K` � 9• 51 i I - 6 }1..'\� 118• ,JI 112" ` ` I _��— 12 WJ 1 1LILLS 122 —1 16" ^SIr1' - I /960 111 503/670 BLAC _�.• �4111, 12 - dL4[NN4NR I �: f!!! 1 �' 105 532/fi6_p�= _-6SL81,0 �' 1 112 50.4/670 1 12' •ice FIG. #3 city of eagan WATER approved:. plate #tl— PUBLICBLIC � . _ WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT F - - .. y" -y D"a � ... i4 D"4 D -c ^ 24' .DrP-_Y,.;P_ni -- 880.0 OP -2 4,0 ..678.0 } 827.6. L.S.-4 Ba2.6. 84 3 t_- 841 841 9 CP -5 - 850.5 873.0 '-�recm 875. •n r�� iPaHKI : -11T1 +DGE - 'CP:2--: _��_--- -30 - C -K-- 874. 878. 523 .5 J29,7 r9• 240.4 "i1. - c .. •:V'.� - ryrs 826.5 625.0 829.6 829.7 _ / 87 - BBI CP -II I a 844.0 795.0 JP-2� rZ 6472 608.1 _ _ _ ._ _�;. 8 44 0 .\ 85/.5 - \ JP -4 24- " 844 0 ..\i 6]90.7 ti -846.5 8010 7.1. JP -5 - - 8238 CK�ANN I 27'-- -LL GHN BP -2 I 7 e Y.CliOI i -- I -BP-29 8097 8J6.0 1 !I jp 8 B9 BP -2B 8-4 8626 8300 B6B.0 a,NCALE 48' a JP -36 -, 870.6 10_44. DP-15 - 876.0 8782 ryIY Lp1AY�° I -- i °- DP -19 n _2,1ipp_3 60.0 671.7 J -67/.7 � � -.rJ.IG -SOP-13 D 882.0--,b - \ DP -2T_._-_ BB.43 8746 OP -6 878.0 857.3 ((((((��-O OP -1 I _ 8665 8560 869.9 ~�t6" 8383 DP -4 85855.4 n. / 874,8 L.B.-7 F--�71I2 Da-lo ////��1 • `V 8480 DF 1001 0 0-r _ .8600- G. 4J 9012 B6 OP-23-I_90a2 0• /-- 6930 DP -7 2 897.6 lam• I 7A2• Y__.,g°0620 DP -, 6645 -f.•.k ' 892.0 _ ,g1P'g13- - _r -` 812.6 , 90/85 J J2. 99)6 JP -47 , 9955 y JP -46 8492 - J-0 _ - 892.3 ,8513 16- - _ 891.5 s L's'I JP -63 c_ - 7.2 899.7 JF JP -Il 9007 1-,. 81 615.7 -JP-4q .+�r' 8300 I' 690.T -- 895J •._:'.141 .f_.,II��_ Jv': _� ��--- JP -10- _ 8208. 830.0 F JP -49 8300 pp l7. - 830.0 ITCH F-. I____�1 a\ 2Y ///CCChhhiiilll 859 4 ................ ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL FOREST RIDGE FIG. # 1 city of eagan - a standard PUBLIC STORM SEWER approved: plate #: WORKS DEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN Agenda Information April 2, 1985 City Page Twenty -Seven Memo Council Meeting CONTRACT 85-1/AWARD CONTRACT/S & W INDUSTRIAL ACRES A. Contract 85-1, Receive Bids/Award Contract (S & W Industrial Acres) --On Thursday, March 28, 1985, at 10:30 a.m., bids were opened at City Hall. The successful low bidder of six bidders was F.F. Jedlicki who submitted a base bid of $132,026.50. A list of all bidders along with their base bids is contained on page W - The low total base bid of $132,026.50 is 21% under the feasibility report and 5.7% under the engineers estimate. A minor change in the scope of this project resulted from narrowing of the street and the sale of excess material by the Contractor are the apparent reasons for the 21% discrepancy from the feasibility report. According to our consulting engineers, F.F. Jedlicki is a responsible contractor and therefore should be considered' for the bid award for Contract 85-1. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Award City Contract 85-1, Project 430 (S & W Industrial Acres - streets and utilities) to F.F. Jedlicki Construction Company in the amount of $132,026.50 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the required contract documents. 1�13 Our File No. 49324 S & W INDUSTRIAL ACRES UTILITY S STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY CONTRACT NO. 85-1 - PROJECT 430 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.S.T. BID DATE: Thursdav, March 28, 1985 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ----- Feasibility Report, Project 430 Low Bid, Contract 85-1 % Over (+)/Under (-) Feasibility Report % Over (+)/Under (-) Engineer's Estimate $140,000.00 167,035.00 132,026.50 -21% -5.7% CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. F.F. Jedlicki 132,026.50 2. S.M. Hentges & Son 132,457.96 3. Orfei & Sons, Inc. 148,122.81 4. Alexander Construction 161,833.95 - 5. Northdale Construction 163,205.00 6. 0 & P Contracting 175,581.00 7• McNamara Vivant Contracting No Bid 8. Ro-So Contracting No Bid 9. Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. No Bid 10. Lake Area Utility No Bid 11. Spencer Construction No Bid 12. M. Danner Trucking Nn Rid ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ----- Feasibility Report, Project 430 Low Bid, Contract 85-1 % Over (+)/Under (-) Feasibility Report % Over (+)/Under (-) Engineer's Estimate $140,000.00 167,035.00 132,026.50 -21% -5.7% Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight CONTRACT 85-2/AWARD CONTRACT/PEACEFUL HEIGHTS B. Contract 85-2, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Peaceful Heights) -- Sealed bids were opened at 10:30 a.m, on Friday, March'29, 1985, for the street and utility improvements for the Peaceful Heights Addition under Contract 85-2, Project 420. The low bid of 12 bidders was ACG, Inc. Their low bid was $83,083.35. As can be seen on page the bid is 27% under the feasibility report and 10.7x Under the engineer's estimate. To staff's knowledge, this contractor has not worked within or for Eagan in the past. Our consulting engineering firm will be checking for some references regarding their work. This contractor did supply a bid bond which indicates that ACG, Inc., is a responsi- ble bidder. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To award City Contract 85-2 (Peaceful Heights - Utility and Street Improvements) to the lowest responsible bidder, ACG, Inc., in the amount of $83,083.35 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents. Our File No. 49326 PEACEFUL HEIGHTS UTILITIES 6 STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY CONTRACT #85-2 - PROJECT 0420 EAGAN, MINNESOTA CONTRACTORS BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.S.T. BID DATE: Fridav, March 29, 1985 TOTAL BASE BID 83,083.35 86,360.90 86,929.20 87,355.87 87,771.00 89,056.35 90,918.13 93,788.35 94,697.75 96,122.75 96.853.30 04 977In No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ 93,000.00 Feasibility Report 107,870.00 Low Bid 83,083.35 %'of Low Bid, Feasibility Report -237 % of Low Bid, Engineer's Estimate -10.7% / 6 1. ACG, Inc. 2. Lake Area Utility •' 3. Spencer Contracting 4. S.M. Hentges & Son 5. Burschville Construction 6. F.F. Jedlicki Inc. 7. Orfei & Sons, Inc. d. 0 & P Contracting 9. Gartzke Construction 10. M. Danner Trucking 11. Northdale Construction 12. Rice Lake Contracting 13. H.B.H. Construction 14. Lund Asphalt Construction 15. McNamara Contracting Co. 16. Ro-So Contracting 17. S.J. Louis Construction 18. Alexander Construction BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.S.T. BID DATE: Fridav, March 29, 1985 TOTAL BASE BID 83,083.35 86,360.90 86,929.20 87,355.87 87,771.00 89,056.35 90,918.13 93,788.35 94,697.75 96,122.75 96.853.30 04 977In No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ 93,000.00 Feasibility Report 107,870.00 Low Bid 83,083.35 %'of Low Bid, Feasibility Report -237 % of Low Bid, Engineer's Estimate -10.7% / 6 Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine UULV1'KAI.T 67-//HUVGK 7"1 JbL9 hlV"1" run D1UJ LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION — STREETS & UTILITIES C. Contract 85-7, Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (LeMay Lake 1st Addition) --Earlier on the agenda, the public hearing was held to discuss the installation of streets and utilities to service the LeMay Lake 1st Addition under Project 424. If that public hearing is closed and the project ordered in, it would be in order for the Council to consider approval of the detailed plans and specifications and authorize the advertisement for bid opening. These plans and specifications have been simultaneously prepared by the consulting engineeringfirm at the petitioned request of the developer • with all costs guaranteed by the developer should the project not be approved at the time of public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 85-7 providing for the installation of streets and utilities to service the LeMay Lake 1st Addition and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, April 30, 1985. s/Thomas L. Hedges City.Administrator MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY AMDINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 29, 1985 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE CITY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE MEETING Enclosed is a copy of a memorandum and agenda for the upcoming City Celebration Committee scheduled for April 1. Also attached are copies of minutes and a press release regarding that Committee. This information is enclosed and.referenced on pages /0 O through 4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION CONTRIBUTION & CITY CELEBRATION BUDGET • At a recent City Council meeting, a question was asked about the budgeting of fireworks for the Eagan 4th of July celebration. The fireworks allocation was budgeted in the amount of $1,000 in Parks and Recreation under Other Contractural Services, Account No.. 4430. Also in discussing the $5,000 budget that was recently approved for the City Celebration Committee, it is the opinion of the Director of Finance that $5,000 will be transfered out of the Contingency Department to Administration which means that the contingency would be reduced to $217,720 and Adminis- tration would be increased to $198,280. The Director of Finance will transfer the entire $5,000 as an appropriation to Line Item No. 4220 which is Operating Supplies. He has set up a new program in Administration for the cost. CEDAR CLIFF BANK FACILITY/PYLON SIGN Earlier this winter, the City Council approved a pylon sign for the Cedar Cliff bank facility. There was a question raised by the City Council and approval was subject to an opinion from the City Attorney's office affirming that the sign ordinance does not prevent the erection of such a sign. The City Attorney's office did research the pylon sign and a copy of those findings are enclosed on pages /06 through /07 for your review. I apologize for submitting this memorandum late to the City Council, however, when it was received in late February, it was placed in the April 2 file as opposed to the March 5 City Council file. MEMO TO ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION At the last regular City Council meeting, a draft copy of a memorandum to the Advisory Planning Commission was reviewed. The memorandum was finalized and submitted to the Advisory Planning Commissio_9 this week for their review. A copy is enclosed on pages through for the City Council. MASAC UPDATE Enclosed on pages //D through �� % is a copy of an agenda and minutes that were distributed or t e recent MASAC meeting. q5�1 MEMO TO HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS MARCH 29, 1985 PAGE 2 Mr. Tom Baker, the City's representative on MASAC, and John Hohenstein attended the meeting, and the 180 degree turn or what is referenced as the Burnsville turn did not receive any formal action by the Committee that evening. It was continued until the April 23 meeting for further consideration. Mayor Blomquist and the City Administrator had an opportunity to meet with Jeff Hamiel, Aiport Director, and Darrell Weslander, noise abatement officer for the Metropolitan Airports Commission, on Wednesday, March 27. Mayor Blomquist and the City Administrator were briefed on a number of operations that relate to air traffic noise and also given a rather extensive tour of the airport grounds, witnessing takeoffs, landings, the ground run-up area and actually experiencing time in the control tower discussing takeoff and landing maneuvers with the FAA. The meeting was originally planned as a luncheon beginning at 12:30, however, due to the • interest expressed by all four parties, Mayor Blomquist and the City Administrator did not leave the airport until about 5:20 p.m. The City Administrator has recorded a number of notes and will be preparing a memoradum for review by both the Airports Noise Committee and City Council. Both the Mayor and City Adminis- trator felt the afternoon was a learning experience and would highly recommend members of the Airport Noise Committee and City Council to spend some time at the airport with those two individuals to receive a similar type tour. HRA STATUS REPORT Enclosed on pages lie through /I I is a copy of the February status reports for all the assisted housing programs in Dakota County and the community development programs administered by the Dakota County HRA. Enclosed is a brief description of assisted housing programs which is helpful in reviewing the statistical data. LAWRENCE POPPLER/LEMAY LAKE PROJECT Enclosed in your packet is a sealed envelope that was submitted to the City Administrator by Mr. Lawrence Poppler on behalf of his son, Larry Poppler. The Popplers were concerned about a survey that was recently taken by the owners of the LeMay Lake project which apparently consumed approximately 17# feet of the Poppler property. The City Administrator, acting as the Director of Public Works, did meet with the Popplers and discussed the matter with a representative of the LeMay Lake project. It is the full intention of the owners of the LeMay Lake project that the 17� feet will be deeded as an outlot or an easement to the Popplers and not considered as a part of the LeMay Lake project. The City Administrator has received word from the Popplers that they are satisfied with the results of the negotiations with the developers of the LeMay Lake project and, therefore, the matter is resolved. �i City Adminis r for (;r7 TLH/ii 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Moor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Cmivo Mem0pr5 THOMAS HEDGES CIN Aomnns"Tor MEMO TO: ALL MEMBERS, CITY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Gry Clerk FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DUFFY DATE: MARCH 26, 1985 SUBJECT: APRIL 1, 1985 COMMITTEE AGENDA Enclosed please find an agenda for the April 1, 1985 regular City Celebration Committee meeting. Also enclosed are a copy of the minutes from the March 13 meeting and a rough draft of a proposed news release to be distributed to local media. Please review both items before the meeting on Monday. As per direction of the committee, several people have been invited to attend the April 1 meeting. A representative of the Mendota Heights Lions Club was to be contacted to attend and give further direction on the turkey barbeque. Also, Dorothy Peterson of the City of Eagan Parks and Recreation Department has been invited to explain and help coordinate park activities and locations with the committee. A representative of the Police Auxiliary will also be in attendance for discussion regarding their proposed T-shirt, hat and balloon sales. If you are unable to attend, please contact me. Enclosures cc: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers City Administrator Hedges THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 1100 AGENDA CITY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE APRIL 1, 1985 4:30 P.M. EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes 3. Visitors to be Heard 4. SubCommittee Reports a. History Book b. Lone Oak Tree C. City Celebration 5. Fund Raising Suggestions 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment r 1 U • CITY OF EAGAN MINUTES OF THE CITY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE March 13, 1985 A regular meeting of the City of Eagan Celebration Committee was held on Monday, March 13, 1985, at 4:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were resident members Carol Bergh, Sandra Masin, John McElligott, Rod Smith, and Mary Voracek; Bob Treichel representing the Volunteer Fire Department; Larry Wenzel representing the Eagan Chamber of Commerce; Don Klober representing the 4th of July Association; Bruce Harries representing the Eagan Jaycees; Richard Bertz representing the Minnesota Valley Exchange Club; and Brad Benzick representing the Optimists Club. Also present were Mayor Bea Blomquist, City Councilmember Ted Wachter, Historian Consultant Lisa Fleming and Administrative Assistant Holly Duffy. Absent were Ken Ketcham representing the Eagan Lions Club and Reverend Loren Nelson representing the Ministerial Association. • Approval of Minutes Bertz moved and the motion was seconded to approve the minutes of the February 4, 1985 meeting as presented. All voted in favor. Election of Officers Larry Wenzel was nominated to be Chairperson of the City Celebration Committee, the nomination was seconded and he was elected unanimously. Sandra Masin was nominated to be Vice Chairperson of the City Celebration Committee, the nomination was seconded and she was elected unanimously. Subcommittee Reports Chairperson Wenzel called for subcommittee reports. •• History Book Subcommittee The History Book Subcommittee reported that the final draft manuscript of the history document was almost completed. Only minor additions are yet to be added. All City Councilmembers were given a copy of the final draft and have submitted suggestions on final revisions. The staff will work with West Publishing to develop a request for proposals (RFP) for the publication of the book. It is estimated that the book will be ready for distribution approximately two months after submission to a publisher. Lone Oak Tree Subcommittee The Lone Oak Tree Subcommittee reported that they have been working with a sculptor and discussing preliminary plans for the Lone Oak sculpture (carving). The sculptor will help to develop specifications and cost projections for the sculpture. He will also help to select the sculptor who will actually perform the project. The subcommittee projected the July 4 weekend as a kickoff date for the project and a wrap up/presentation in the fall. The subcommittee is recommending that the scupture be performed where residents of the community will be able to watch the actual process. The pulbic works department will be contacted to see if they can prepare the smaller pieces of the tree for burning (stamping). Possibilities of items which could be made from the pieces included key chains, coasters and refrigerator magnets. City Celebration Subcommittee The City Celebration Subcommittee recommended that the Saturday of the 4th of July weekend (July 6) be selected as a major celebration day. They suggested that the main event of the day be a turkey barbeque. The Mendota Heights Lions Club was contacted by subcommittee members and has agreed to act as consultants for the project. They have many years experience in putting on such a turkey barbeque. .It is estimated that approximately 90 turkeys would need to be purchased. The Lions will be able to recommend the amount of people needed to help with this project. The subcommittee is looking into tents for seating. The subcommittee also suggested that a second fireworks display be presented the night of July 6. The carnival would be expected to contribute some funding for this and also the City Council would be approached for a donation. Another suggestion was a very large cake to be served to those at the barbeque. The subcommittee checked into prices and a 2,000 piece iced sheet cake would cost approximately $380 to $400. A suggestion was made that a mock cake decorated with some sort of theme presentation be presented for display purposes only and the sheet cake actually be served. Bertz moved, Klober seconded the motion that the City Celebration Committee establish July 6 for a main birthday celebration activity to include a turkey barbeque, birthday cake and fireworks. The motion was approved by a majority vote, 10 members voting for and one against. The Jaycees are planning to have a major theme float in the parade. Mayor Bea Blomquist appeared and reported that a major grand opening of I -35E was planned for the fall by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. She suggested that the City tie into the opening with birthday related events such as a parade featuring various types of transportation used in Eagan during the past 125 years, bicycle races, etc. She has discussed the idea with Mr. Kermit McRae from MnDOT and he received the suggestion favorably. The exact date for the opening is not presently known and will depend on weather and possible labor strikes. However, MnDOT estimates that they will be able to set a date sometime in June. As of now, the first week in November is the most probable. Budget/Funding Discussion was held concerning methods of sculpture. Partial funding could come from sale tree. Funding contributions could also be businesses and industries. 2 funding the Lone Oak Tree of souvenier pieces of the solicited from residents, • 9- Cost estimations were given. It was estimated that the total firework display would cost $3,000, part of which would be picked up by the carnival. The birthday cake was estimated at $450. Advance costs for the turkey barbeque were approximately $2,000. A float would cost approximately $200 and satellites approximately $400. Bertz volunteered to act as treasurer to handle funds. It was suggested that the next meeting concentrate on the subject of budget, money needed up front, and fund raising and marketing ideas. The Eagan Police Association is interested in selling T—shirts, hats and balloons. A representative of the association will be invited to the April meeting. Bartz moved and the motion was seconded to authorize the total sum of $3,000 toward a fireworks display. All voted in favor. Miscellaneous Discussion Voracek suggested that the official unveiling of the sculpture be timed with the I -35E opening. Bergh moved and the motion was seconded that the City • work with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Chamber of Commerce for a celebration, possibly to include a parade, another cake and bike races, as a part of that opening. All voted in favor. The possibility of having souvenier sales of wood from the Lone Oak Tree at the library was suggested. The Friends of the Library will be contacted after it is determined whether or not the sculpture will be performed at the library. Rod Smith and his woodworking students are making 20 Lone Oak Tree souvenir clocks which they will donate for fund raising purposes. Masin reported that the Parks and Recreation Department of the City sponsors "Summer in the Park" concerts/ entertainment events on Wednesday evenings during the middle of the summer. She suggested that the event scheduled for either the Wednesday preceding the 4th of July or following it could be tied into the celebration. Another possibility was to change the date of one of the programs to July 6 and to hold it in conjunction with the celebration. The committee favored the July 6 date. Masin will check with the Parks and Recreation Department. The next meeting was scheduled for April 1, 1985. Members are to bring in fund raising ideas and to contact various civic organizations to see it they would be willing to help in the celebration. A representative from the Mendota Heights Lions Club was to be invited to the April meeting. Harries moved and the motion was seconded to appoint Richard Bartz as treasurer of the committee. All members voted in favor. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:00 p.m. Date: March 13, 1985 -4 14,-3 hnd ©F 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A- SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES CIN Abmirksuatar EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE 01, Clerk Traditionally, the Fourth of July commemorates the birthday of the United States of America. This year, events celebrating the 125th birthday of the City of Eagan will be added to the festivities. The theme of the long holiday weekend will be Eagan's birthday party and major events are being planned not only for Thursday, the actual14th of July, but also for Saturday, July 6. The City Celebration Committee, appointed by the City Council to design and organize events, has announced tentative plans for the weekend. In addition to Thursday's traditional parade and fireworks, an all -day community party is proposed for Saturday, July 6. Possible highlights include a turkey barbeque, giant birthday cake, speeches, entertainment and a second fireworks presentation. A carnival and food booths will operate through the entire weekend. The committee is seeking to involve as many residents as possible in these events and is asking that any groups or individuals wishing to participate contact the city administrator's office, 454-8100, and volunteer their services. THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 1A IL Organizations which have already volunteered include the Fourth of July Association, the Volunteer Fire Department, the Eagan Lions, the Eagan Jaycees, the Ministerial Association, the Minnesota Valley Exchange Club, the Eagan Chamber of Commerce, the Optimists Club, the Friends of the Library and the Police Auxiliary. Members of these organizations should contact their chairperson to specifically offer their services for the city celebration events. • In addition to the above events, the publication of the Eagan history book, "Lone Oak Years," is planned for this summer and a major carving utilizing the trunk portion of the historic Lone Oak Tree will be an ongoing event. The committee is also planning a major event to bE held in the fall of the year. -30- 4/2/85 • Contact: Holly Duffy, 454-8100 HAUGE, SMITH & Dim. P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PAUL H HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE RALPH W. COREY February 18, 1985 Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Cedar Cliff Bank Facility - Pylon Sign Dear Mr. Hedges: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 4564224 At the February 5, 1985 City Council meeting, the City Council approved a conditional use permit for a pylon sign to be erected on Cliff Road for the drive-in bank facility planned at that location by Federal Land Company. This approval was subject to an opinion from our office affirming that the Sign Ordinance does not prevent the erection of such a sign. The question is whether City Code, Section 4.20, Subd. 6.c. relating to Area Identification Signs for Shopping Centers and Other Major Complexes prevents erection of the sign. Section 4.20, Subd. 6.c. reads as follows: • "C. Major Complex. when an area identification is required, such as for • a shopping center, major apartment complex, or major industrial building, up to one free-standing or pylon sign may be allowed for each major industrial street. The Council shall determine the maximum size after reviewing the applicable conditions including terrain, safety factors, etc." This Section must be read in conjunction with Section 4.20, Subd. 6.b. which allows up to one pylon sign per building. The proposed sign for the drive-in bank facility is not intended to be an area identification sign relating to a major complex, and for this reason, it would come under Subd. 6.b., rather than Subd. 6.c. Consequently, the proposed sign is allowable under the ordinance. It is true that there is already an area identification sign erected for Cedar Cliff Shopping Center, near the corner of Nicols Road and Cliff Road. However, since the bank is a separate building, it would still be allowed its own sign under Subd. 6.b. Because Subd. 6.c. allows a certain number of signs per major adjacent street rather than per building, we interpret Subd. 6.c. i Ai_ Thomas Hedges February 18, 1985 Page 2 not as a substitute for Subd. 6.b. whenever a building is part of a major complex, but rather as authorization for more than one sign per building in a very limited number of circumstances. For these reasons, it is our opinion that the proposed pylon sign for the drive -up bank facility near Cedar Cliff Shopping Center is not in violation of the Sign Ordinance. • BS:ras a 167 Very truly yours, HAUCE, SMITH 6 EIDE, P.A. Bradley Sm Assistant City Attorney MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNr[TG COMMISSION CHAIRMAN, CHUCK HALL ALL MEMBERS OF ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 27, 1985 SUBJECT: PLATTING & PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONCERNS At the joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting that was held on January 29, a number of guidelines and directions were discussed relative to development philosophy as it pertains to to the planned growth of our community. Both the City Attorney and I were able to record a number of notes from that meeting and review a list of concerns that were discussed at the joint meeting with the City Council. The City Council did review our list and with some minor modification has asked that these notes be shared with members of the Advisory Planning Commission. The following is an attempt to summarize some of these concerns: 1. The suggestion was made that there be minimum standards, e.g., 10,500 s.f. per lot due to the fact that there have been numerous applications requesting variation from the 12,000 s.f. minimum single-family lot size, with no slid- ing scale for the lot size designations. 2. There should be a balance of housing afforded including size of lot, price of housing, quality of construction, condominiums, townhouses, single-family, and multiple -fam- ily projects. E 3. It was suggested an inventory of lot sizes be prepared by the City Planning Department that could be updated period- ically that would reflect existing zoning, existing plat- ting, existing housing, vacant lots within the various residential categories. • 4. Within the guidelines mentioned above, there should be an indication of whether the low and moderate income level housing is being complied with as prescribed in the Compre- hensive Guide Plan. 5. The revised Comprehensive Guide Plan that will be prepared during 1985 should reflect residential land use designa- tions that do not create confusion among the public regard- ing planned use densities as opposed to specific zoning categories. 6. The proposed plat should maintain landscape compatibility in order to retain the terrain features to as great an extent as possible. The proposal should be reviewed to determine if it is amenable to the physical setting of the property prior to the development. 7. The Advisory Planning Commission should review each pro- ject submitted to it for approval and make specific recommendations based upon policy guidelines set up by /a 'Y' MEMO TO APC MARCH 27, 1985 PAGE TWO the City Council and comprehensive plan guidelines and the City Council will review each of the applications based upon the recommendations of the Advisory Planning Commission and the guidelines prescribed by it. 8. There were specific concerns about variations from the minimum setback requirements, street width standards and the use of planned development to allow a reduction in minimum lot sizes under the City ordinance and policies, 9. Impact upon schools, traffic loads and compliance with minimum safety standards, and impact upon available and • proposed park development should be included in the plan- ning reports submitted to the reviewing bodies. 10. Whether the variations from the strict standards should be allowed in the event that the development is in the nature of a transitional use between two non -compatible land uses. After reviewing the aforementioned concerns with the City Council, it was their determination that this list should be used by the Planning Department and Commission to provide some philosophical guidance regarding future development. The future and long-lasting image of the City will be molded during the next several years and it is important to work closely as a staff, planning commission and City Council as it relates to the long-term development philos- ophies. Hopefully this will help provide some of the specific guidance the Planning Commission would appreciate while reviewing . future applications. \ I r�'I �` � l � II=al I 1 City Administrator V CC: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers Dale Runkle, City Planner Rich Hefti, Acting City Engineer Ken Vraa, Director of Parks & Recreation Paul Hauge, City Attorney Dale Peterson, Chief Building Inspector TLH/kf AGENDA METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING March 26, 1985 7:30 P.M. • 6040 28th Avenue So., Minneapolis, MN 1. Call to Order, Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on February 26, 1985 3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications 4. Technical Advisor's Preferential Runway System Utilization Report and Complaint Summary Report 5. Persons Wishing to Address the Council 6. Minutes of Operations Committee Meetings: March 6 and 20, 1985 • 7. Minutes of Executive Committee Meeting: March 21, 1985 8. Minutes of Legislative Committee Meeting: March 20, 1985 9• Dave Kelso: State Noise Standards 10. Report of MASAC Representative to MAC Meeting on March 18, 1985 11. Other Items Not on Agenda 12. Adjournment Next Meeting Date: April 23, 1985 /le? M • • MINUTES METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING February 26, 1985 7:30 P.M. Minneapolis, Minnesota 1. Call to Order, Roll Call. Chairman Walter Rockenstein called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and asked the secretary to call the roll. The following members were in attendance: Ben Griggs (R) Bob Johnson (R) Marty Thon (R) Jack Spalding (A) Bill Summers (R) Niel Atkinson (R) James McLaughlin (A) Ron Glaub (R) Jeff Hamiel (R) John Richter (R) James Serrin (R) Roylene Champeaux (R) Walter Rockenstein (R) Dennis Schulstad (A) Steve Cramer (A) Scott Bunin (R) Eugene Bohmert (R) Donald Priebe (R) Donald Fondrick (R) Larry Shaughnessy (R) Tom Baker (R) Bob O'Brien (A) Juan Rivas (A) Martin Silvi (R) Northwest Airlines Republic Airlines Eastern Airlines United Airlines USAirlines Air Line Pilots Association Air Llne Pilots Association Minnesota Business Aircraft Association Metropolitan Airports Commission City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of St. Paul City of St. Paul City of Richfield City of Richfield City of Mendota Heights City of Eagan City of Burnsville City of Burnsville City of Inver Grove Heights MASAC Minutes -2- February 26, 1985 Advisors Les Case Federal Aviation Administration Commissioner Barbara Ashley Metropolitan Airports Commission Darrell Weslander Technical Advisor Joan Vandersloot Secretary Guests J. K. Nelson Bloomington Doug Koehntop St. Anthony Village Larry Hartman Minneapolis John Seitz Minneapolis Dave Kelso Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Commissioner Jan Del Calzo Metropolitan Airports Commission George Volsky Buffalo Airways 2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on January 22, 1985• • The January 22, 1985 minutes were approved as presented. 3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications. Letters were received from the following: Michael Brucciani regarding the noise log; a third grader requesting information about airport noise; and the City of Bloomington reappointing Robert Mood and Mark Mahon as MASAC representatives, and Neil Peterson and John Pidgeon as alternates. 4. Technical Advisor's Preferential Runway S n Report and Complaint Summary Report. The reports for the month of January were presented by Darrell Weslander. • 5. Persons Wishing to Address the Council. Steve Cramer reminded MASAC of the importance of responding to the South Minneapolis Airport Action Council (SMAAC). It appears they are waiting for further discussion of the proposal sent to the MAC and FAA. Dave Kelso also mentioned that the Pollution Control Agency has received numerous calls regarding this issue. Larry Hartman, a member of SAAAC, referenced an amendment to the proposal which will be forwarded to the MAC in time for the next scheduled Executive Committee meeting. 6. Minutes of Operations Committee Meetings: February 7 and 21, 1985• The February 7 Operations Committee Meeting was briefly outlined by Darrell Weslander. It was primarily a planning and organizational meeting. A package of relevant • • MASAC Minutes -3- February.26, 1985 material was mailed to all Operations Committee members for the February 21 .meeting. Due to a scheduling difficulty, the February 21 meeting was postponed to March 6. 7. Monthly Complaint Report: Method of Tabulation. The manner in which complaints are received and tabulated was the topic of much debate, and it was the general consensus that the method of recording complaints be standardized. It was moved by Jeff Hamiel and seconded by Scott Bunin that only those complaints received by telephone or in single event letter be accepted and counted in the monthly reports. Complaints received in monthly "log" form will not be tabulated or included in the reports. The motion passed unanimously. In addition, it was moved by Bob the records show the number of "logged'' Johnson and seconded by complaints from Larry Shaughnessy Ina April 198x+ through January 1965. The motion passed unanimously. The complaints received in log form for the previously mentioned months are as follows: Number of Complaints Number of Complaints Month Submitted on Logs Month Submitted on Logs April 14 September 16 May 20 October 21 June 17 November 26 July 50 December 29 August 29 January 13 8. Minutes of Executive Committee: February 4, 1985. The minutes of the meeting were presented by Walter Rockenstein who stated that the objective was to prepare a response for the South Minneapolis Airport Action Council (SAAAC) at the April MASAC meeting. 9. Noise Abatement Plan Yearly Report: Discussion. Regarding the status of the revised Yearly Report, Jeff Hamiel reported that Nigel Finney, Director of Planning b Engineering, has been in contact with Howard, Needles, Tammen and Bergendoff. Meetings between Mr. Finney and HNTB will be forth coming. 10. Report of MASAC Representative to MAC Meeting on February 19, 1985. Walter Rockenstein informed MASAC of the relevant issues presented at the MAC meeting, February 19. The following items were discussed: (1) the purchase of noise monitoring equipment; (2) the Operations Committee's lease policy at reliever airports; and (3) the Ad Hoc committee on terminal facilities use, which could eventually affect us all, particularly in terms of the number of operations generated. //3 MASAC Minutes -4- February 26, 1985 12 Other Items Not on Agenda. Dennis Schulstad stated that Denver has plans to close Stapleton Airport within the next decade and build a new facility in an area that would be unaffected by noise as there are no homes or industry in the vicinity. A few days later, however, he read an article about a builder who bought acres of land around the site to develop 1600 single family residential homes. George Volsky, an attorney representing Buffalo Airways, addressed MASAC regarding the use of Boeing 707 (Stage 1) aircraft in to and out of MSP. Buffalo is appealing to MASAC and requests its assistance in allowing them to continue serving the market through April 14, 1985• MAC is in the process of getting an injunction against Buffalo Airways which would prohibit them from flying their 8707 equip- ment into MSP. After the presentation by Mr. Volsky, numerous questions, answers and comments, it wasmoved b John Richter and seconded by James Serrin that MASAC endorse the resolution -5 which was previously passed and implemented into a Field • Rule and enforce the rule. The endorsement would mean Buffalo would not be allowed to continue its flights. A roll call vote was taken and the results are as follows: Ayes: Niel Atkinson, Air Line Pilots Association; Jeff Hamiel, MAC; John Richter, Minneapolis; James Serrin, Minneapolis; Roylene Champeaux, Minneapolis; Walter Rockenstein, Minneapolis; Scott Bunin, St. Paul; Eugene Bohmert, St. Paul; Larry Shaughnessy, Mendota Heights. Nays: None Abstentions: Ben Griggs, Northwest Airlines; Bob Johnson, Republic Airlines; Marty Thor, Eastern Airlines; Jack Spalding, United Airlines; Bill Summers, USAirlines; Ron Glaub, Minnesota Business Aircraft Association; Don Priebe, Richfield; Don Fondrick, Richfield; Tom Baker, Eagan. . Also, let the record show that the airline company members of MASAC did not participate in the discussion of this issue. One other item discussed was the Noise Rule. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency feels it is ready to enter into a non -controversial rule making procedure. Official notice will be in approximately 3 weeks. The issue was referred to the Legislative Committee of MASAC. Adjournment. The,meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Joan Vandersloot MASAC Secretary 14 1984 'old -Chamberlain Field tilt un -ups 0 iiscellaneous 4 __4T_ 1985 old -Chamberlain Field 108 un -ups 1 iscellaneous 17 Total 126 iiscellaneous complaints In- ludes helicopters and secon- lary airports. Crystal 1 Holman 13 Miscellaneous 3 17 C>t apple Valley tloomington lurnsvllle :ottage Grove :agan Inver Grove Heights lendota Heights Unneapolis tichfieId ;t. Paul TO 2 8 17 1 12 3 1 37 11 2 t7i r LOG jJ 0 �1 0 0 0 5 1 I 6 14 MINNEAPOLIS 4o 30% 18% 7 t 11t ORICHFIELD/ BLOOMINGTON HOURLY PERCENTAGE USE OF RUNWAYS O • PAUL/HIGHLAND PARK MENDOTA HEIGHTS/ EAGAN OPERATIONS SUMMARY - Itinerant: Air Carrier Commuter General Aviation Military MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Local: Civil Military FEBRUARY, 1985 Total Average Dally Opns 1985 /1984 626 518 79 133 175 176 21 14 31 30 0 0 932 / 871 CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE (AC) 762/65n 141 122 of these are 3rd level carriers utilizing prop aircraft. MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1 MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL COMPLAINT RECORD Nighttime Number of Excessive Structural Activity Restricted Ground Low Secondary Date Complaints Noise Disturbance Interruption Hours Run -ups Noise Flying Airports Miscellaneous 1 6 3 2 3 0 - -- 1 - 1 2 4 9 4 - - I - 1 - 5 2 1 - - - - - 6 4 2 7 4 I - - 3 - - - - - 8 4 2 9 0 - JN 10 1 11 2 12 0 I 2 13 7 1 - 14 4 3- 15 4 16 1 17 0 18 1- 19 2 20 6 3 - - 2 - 1 - - 21 2 1 - - - 1 2 - - - - - 2 4 22 11 3 - _ 23 1 1 - - - - - 24 7 3 - 2- 25 13 9 - -- 26 4 2 - - - - - - - 27 21 13 - 4 - - 1 3 - - - 28 9 5 - 2 1 - 1 - - TOTAL 126 60 - 14 18 1 5 11 14 3 FEBRUARY, 1985 NOISE COMPLAINTS by Category and Time of Day During February the following complaints were recorded: • Category Number Percentage Excessive Noise 60 48% Activity Interruption 14 11% Nighttime Restricted Hours 18 14% Run -ups 1 1% Ground Noise 5 4% Low Flying 11 9% Secondary Airports 14 11% Miscellaneous 3 2% 126 100% Time Number 2400 - 0559 11 0600 - 1159 47 1200 - 1559 18 1600 - 1959 13 2000 - 2359 16 CAP 21 126 ��7 Brief description of assisted housing programs: 1. Section 8 Existing: Eligible low and moderate income households pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for uti- lities) for rent in market rate rental units. The Dakota County HRA (or South St. Paul HRA) pays the rest. The rental units must pass federal inspection standards and the rent plus an allowance for utilities paid by the renter, must not exceed established Fair Market Rent limits. 2. Moderate Rehab: The Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation program offers owners of rental property assistance for making building repairs which will bring their properties into compliance with Housing Quality Standards. The owner, in turn, agrees to rent to households eligible for Section 8 Rent Assistance. The rental of these units is coordinated through the Dakota County HRA and the rent payments for the tenants is the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available. 3. Section 8 New Construction: The developers of these units receive a subsidy Tor construction of these units. The owners in turn, are required to rent these units to eligible low and moderate income households. The rental payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. These rental deve- • lopments are owned by private developers. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available except for Section 202 projects for senior citizens. 4. Low Rent Housing: The Dakota County HRA (or South St. Paul HRA) owns and manages the housing units offered through the Low Rent Housing Program. These housing units are rented to eligible low and moderate income house- holds who pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for utilities) for rent. 5. 235 Home Ownership: This program offered assistance to eligible low and moderate households for purchasing a home. The program is no longer available. 6. 236 Rental: The developers of these units receive a subsidy for construc- tion of these units. The owners, in turn, are required to rent these units �. to eligible low and moderate income households. The rental payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available. // e I SECTION 8 1 MODERATE I SECTION B REW I LOW REIT 1 235 H ME 1 2.36 RENTAL I CURREiIT I I EXISTING I REFAB I CONSTRUCTION I F0USIIG I FPMILY I FA"ILY I TOTALS GAAI:O' COMMUNITIES I ELD FAMILY TGTALI ELD FPMILY TOTA'_! ELD FA' TOTALI E!D FA 1LY TO?PLI TOTAL In. I E'_D FP?:?LY 7iiA:i -----------------------I------------------ I ------------------I------------------ I -----------------I------------ I------------'---------- APPLE VALLEY 1 -----------------------I----------------I------------------I------------- 8 c"9 37 1 0, 0 0 f 0 56 76 1 0 43 43 !. 0 1 0 1 8 123 135 1 BURNSVILLE 1 ---- -------------------- I------------------ 59 103 162 1 I 0 -------------- 0 0 I ---I 0 87 -I------------- 87 ! 0 55 ----I------------I------------I------------------� 56 1 0 1 180 1 59 426 485 ! EA_A;Y I ----------------------I------------------1-----------------I------------------ 21 127 148 1 0 0 0 1 ------------------ 0 33 ;------------------- ',3 '--- 0 15 1 15 ! --- ------- I ------------ I -------- ----------' 0 1 14 1 2. 313 ---------------' 34;� I FARMIN'GTOII I 26 33 53 1 0 0 0 1 6G 0 � 60 I -------....-----!------------ 0 2 2 1 I ------------'-- 1 '25 --------- --------------I------------------ I ----------------- .4 a I BS 33 I HASTINGS 1 47 130 177 1 4 14 ! 18 1 ------------------ 109 a 109 1 ------------------ 0 13 ' 10 1 ----------- 0 10 1Et IS% 3i4 I ----------------------- 1----------------I------------..-----I ------------------ �-;VER GROVE o 30 147 ill 1 0 0 0 1 0 -a I----------- 40 1 0 I 5 i ------------I------------,1------------------ , '^23 31 4- LP.VEU:'LLE1 13 37 50 1 0 0 0 1 24 0 24 1 0 6 6. 2 I 0 1 37 45 .2 I -----------------------I----------------- ' ------------------ -----------------;------------------ I------------ I------------ I-----------------=1 LILYDALE 0 0 t 1 0 0 0 1 a 0 a l 0 it a l a 1 0 1 0 1 ----------------------I------------------ I ------------------ ! NENDOTA 1 3 0 3 1 0 1 1 1 ------------------I------------------I------------I------------I------------------- 0 r. 0 1 a Z 0 1 0 0 J 4 i ------------------------ MENDOTA HEIGNTS I ------------------ 2 0 I------------------- a ------------------ ------------------- I------------ {------------- 1----------------- i 0 1 1 1 0 i2 12 I 0e" 0 1 0 1- 0 i ----- —-------- ---------I---------------I-----------------I ROSEMOUNT I 6 27 33 1 0 ------------------ I ------------------I--- ------- I ------------ I ----- —_----------- -----------------------I------------------ 0 0 1 33 28 67 1 0 30 31t 1 2 1 0 i 45 87 .32 1 SOUTH ST. PAUL + 1 31 145 I 176 1 ------------------ 0 0 t ! ------------------ 0 44 I ------------------ 44 1 30,0 S I 3:3 ------------I------------i------------------ i ------------------------ ------------------ i I 2 I 531 19. :.__ . SU°ISH LAKE I 0 0 I 0 1 ------------------- 0 0 ------------------I-----------------I------------ 0 1 0 a 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------- -----------------i 0 S I t 0 ------------------------I---------------- 1 WEST ST. PAUL 1 ------------------------I--------------' 192 131 I 323 1 ----------------- 0 6 6 1 0 0 0 1 80 7 87 1 _ 0 1 0 1 F' 14i - 4. I OTHER 2 5 7 1 ----------- 0 ------I----------------------------------- 0 a 0 0 0! a 0 !------------ tt ------------ ---------------- 0 a —i ------------------------ I------------------ I------------------ I------------------ I------------------ !------------ I------------ I---------- -------1 TOTALS 1 I 436 914 1352 1 I 4 22 26 1 I 232 3011 52 1 I 380 174 554 1 I 41 1 526 1 1052 1'377 I 1 �- 3 �i 1 -------- —-------------- I-------------- ---I--- -- ----------- I------------------ I------------------ Brief description of Community Development Programs: 1. Weatherization: Through a joint effort of the Dakota County HRA and Economic Assistance, low-income homeowners and rental units occupied by low- income tenants are being weatherized to reduce the consumption of precious fuels, promote energy conservation, and reduce the burden of high heating costs on low-income county residents who can least afford rapidly rising utility bills. 2. MHFA Home Improvement Loans: The Dakota County HRA administers this State program as a Title I lender. Loans are made to eligible homeowners (adjusted gross income less than $24,000 annually) for code compliance items and certain general improvements. An interest rate of 3% to 11.5% is charged depending on the applicant's income. 3. MHFA Home Rehab Loan: These loans are made to eligible low-income homeowners adjusted gross income under $7,000 annually) for rehabilitation items that directly affect the health, safety, energy conservation and accessibility of the home. The interest rate is 3% and deferred loans are available to households with adjusted gross incomes under $6,000 annually. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 4. MHFA Home Energy Loan: These loans are made to eligible homeowners for energy items. The interest rate is 8% for homeowners with adjusted gross incomes of less than $24,000 annually and an interest rate 9% for those with adjusted gross incomes of more than $24,000 annually. This program is admi- nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 5. Rental Rehab: Rental Rehabilitation loans are available to owners of rental units. There are no income or asset limitations. The loan amount cannot exceed $15,000 per one dwelling unit and for structures with more than one unit the loan limit is $7,500 per unit with a maximum of $37,500. The interest rate on the loan is 11%. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 6. CDBG Rehab Loan: Various housing rehabilitation programs have been done using Community Development Block Grant funds. They have assisted low and moderate income homeowners in making repairs to their homes with low interest loans and grants (grants are no longer available). This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 7. MHFA Solar Bank: Deferred loans are given to eligible low and moderate income homeowners for energy items. The eligible homeowners are referred from Northern States Power Company and Minnegasco. This program is admi- nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 8. 312 Loans: These loans are given to eligible owners of residential struc- tures at an interest rate of 3%. The loan funds must be used to bring the property into compliance with local codes, rehabilitation standards and some types of general improvements. Commercial and mixed use (commercial and residential) properties may apply for loans with an interest rate of 9%. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA in HUD approved target areas. /ZO 0A40TO CCNTY HAA CO'.VIITY OEVELONVIT REPORT MAY 1976 -FEBRUARY 1985 1� r r r r r oENTAI PEIIFB LOA'! 1 VJITP.RI7ATIC4 I MHFA HIM 14`ROV LCA.H I P.lfA HCP._ REHAB LOAN 1 MRA HO.. _YERGY LON I I GRAB 4Ck! P - qq qq SfGPR HJ • > pG �B�d'_IL.FP- EG�'J6 CCl:HLMITIES _------------ I CLO FM. TOT(M.I ELO LG SM ICTALI ELO LG SE TOTAL] ELO LG SM TDtP I ELO LG Se 701AL I E19"' M 10TPLI�ELU S.F}.1 ELO O7AL, APPLE VALLEY I____ p__I ____ I 1 3 1 59 1 62 I ____ I 1 1 ___ I 0 1 ____ I 3 1 __ I _____ 4 1 I e I ----- I 0 I ____ I ____1 0 1 0 1 ____ 1 e l _____ I 1 1 ----- I----- 4 1 I 5 1 _____ I P I ----- I 0 1 ----- I ____I 0 1 0 1 _____I ___ 0 1 I ----- 0 1 I 0 1 _____I ____ 0 1 I____ 0 1 I 0 1 ___-I e 1 ----- I----- 0 1 I C 1 _____ _____ e l e I ____ 1 _ e 1 ____ 1 2 1 L1IRNSVILLE 1 151 le? 11241 PI 11 21 31 11 01 41 51 C I CI 11 11 41 01 CI 01 t 1 C1 31 41 It 21 CI ?I C I 21 e1 21 CW.12N FALLS 111 c'1 31 P1 01 01 P1 21 01 11 11 P1 01 01 r1 CI CI PI PI e CI CI "I OI 21 e! 21 c! C! 2 P: CI CASTLE RUCf _—_-____—__ I e1 41 41 I ___ I—_I --I 01 ___ I—_I 01 11 --- I II __ I ----I 01 11 ____ I II _—__ I __I 21 01 --- I PI ---- _ I PI ____ I PI e1 PI 01 BI 01 01 21 01 e! 21 el 4! 21 e PI 21 CI EAEAN 141 401 521 PI II 51 6I 3I 11 11 51 01 11 --- 21 I 31 -----; PI __-_! 21 _____I ____ e1 I 21 ---- I _____ 11 I _____ II I 21 _____I --- 41 .I ----- e1 ;----- e1 I 2! ____ ____; 01 PI ______ ______ a 2' ______ ____; n,1 CI ____I___I—__I_____ ___I_____ _ ----- ___I—_I____I----- I ----- I_____I----- ! ----- I____I___I—_I____I____;___I—__I----- I----- I___._I _____; ----- ----- FA,------- _____—_______ I 19 I 93 I Ill I 1 __— I ----- _____ I____ P I I 2 1 ____.I 7 1 ____ 9 1 __—I _____ 2 1 1 1 __ __ I 4 1 _____ __—I____ 7 1 2 1 1 1 !0 I 13 I 0 1 P I 2 1 P I 5! ! I ! I 7! 2 1 2. P I .. .. .. . � .. - HP5T1_tr.5 ___ i 39 96 135 5 6 19 r I 21 I 4 t 11 1 36 I 1 1 ____ 2 1 _____ I _____ IL I 1 11 I _____ I 4 1 ____ I 1 1 _____ I ____ 5 1 I :4 I --_I _____ !3 1 I __.._ 7 1 I !B I __—I _____ >_0 1 I _____ 2 1 I e I _ ___; 2 1 _._.-;.__ 2 1 _-t ! _ ____; _ 4 ___-!... ?' _.; _____; __ Par_TP!____I___1_ i_13_i 13-i_J. i__@_i__ 2_i_—z_I___3 i_—e-i --- 1_I --- IP I --- B.I__s_I_B _I_.__ I__a_I_. I _____ a_ e_ e I n I 1 I 1 1 2 1 0 1 2! e I ?! e I c l C 1 n_; I INNER 6OOVE I 19 I 92 1 111 I 2 1 4 I 10 1 16 I 4 1 2 1 15 1 21 I 2 I P I 6 1 6 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 4 1 8 1 13 1 0 1 e I I I I t 2 1 C I C I I C I LiWEVILLE I 15 I 74 1 89 I P I C I 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 4 1 2! 6 1 6 12 2' r. 1 2 1 4 1 e l ? I S I C: 2! c l 2 1 -, .. n ... .. ----------- —_ I _____ I ____ I_ I____ I ___I ___ I ____ I -----1 _____!____ I ____ I _____ I _____ I ____ I _____1 ___ I _____ I _____ I_____ I _.--- I ____ I -----I _____! ___ I ____ LILYOPLE' I e 1 0 1 P I e 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 P I e I 0 1 0 1 C I 0 1 e 1 2! e 1 2 1 e l 2: e 1 0 1 e 1 C I C I C 1 2: C :: 2 1 c 1 - ME190TA 2 2 4 P P PI PI 2I 01 01 el PI CI CI CI PI CI 21 CI 11 "! CI :I CI el dl CI ! :i 2: :1 21 ME4.00TA HEIEHTSI-- B -1__!_I_!7 I P -I --1-I- 2 I' 3 I-- 2-I— 0_I-- 2 I- 4-I—_1 1 1? I--5-I-6I--1-1--e I--e-I-._t-1-2-1-----1----1--4 1— F C—I-- r-I--2 c l 2 1 C MIESVILLE I II 11 21 el C! 01 01 el 01 PI PI 21 c1 P1 e1 0! e: el el CI rt e nI -I-- e e r1 -1---e-i-`-- e -- I fi NORTHFIELD 1 4l 9 1 13_ 2 1 e l I I I I e I e 1 0 1 e I P I e I 0 1 e l 4 1 e 1 2 1 e I e I r I e I e I P 1 2 1 e 1 C: e l c 1 2 1 e C --RAVE." 1 01 0 1- 01'01 01 01 01-01 01'01 CI FI PI 11 'II 01 01 e PI el PI QI 01 e PI 21 PI CI CI cl 21 _; C: RANDOLPH 111 91 101 BI II II 21 e1 01 BI 01 21 !1 II 21 e1 e1 01 01 01 11 el II e1 21 21 PI e 01 e: PI e! POSEMOLSIT 1 7 1 44 1 51 1 0 1 1 1 6 1 7 1 6 1 0 1 Q I 6 1 P I P I 15 I 15 1 e l P I C I P I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 2 1 e l c I e I e! [: ". I C I SOUTH ST. PAL! I 68 1 153 1 221 1 0 1 O I e 1 P I e l Q I 0 1 c I P I O I e I e I P I P I 2 1 P I e l 2! e I e I e l e l e I 4 1 e I C I c: C 1 C: SUNFISH LANE 101 01 0I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 01 01 01'01 21 21 CI 01 01 CI el 01 0I 01 31 01 11 21c ' cl 21 VERMILLION 101 31 31 01 01 CI 01 01 BI BI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 CI 01 PI 01 01 _____1_—I._...._.-.;-____; WEST ST.PPLL 1 47 1 56 1113 1 17 I 6 1 4:31 I 54 I 13 I 6 1 15 I 34 I 3 I P 1 12 1 15 I 19 I 0 1 12 : 31 1 56 I 15 I 54 I :25 1 3 I 0 1 2 1 2 1 : 1 9 1 C. 3 1 1,1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 70ipL5 I 1 I 1257 I 884 11111 I I I I I I 25 1 I I 23 I I 92 1140 I I I I 59 I I 16 I I 57 1132 I I I I 1 7 1 I I 6 1 I I 76 I I I 89 I I I 24 I I I I I 17 I I 42 I I I BSI I I 31 I I 93 1209 I I I I I B I I I 0 1 I I 5 1 I I 5 1 I I1 2 1 I 15 I I I 0 1 I I 2 1 I 1 19 I I 1� - o 1� AULNLA REGULAR HEETANU EAGAN CITY COUNCIL FAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL APRIL 2,.1985 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1I. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT,HEAD 13USINESS PA. Fire= Department 1C. Park & Recreation Department 1 B. Police Department ID. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA r A. Personnel Items ��.(o B. Contractors' Licenses 1 g'C. Project 43J, Present Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Lexington Square 2nd Addition) D. Project 437, Present Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing I (Windtree 4th Addition) IDE. Project 438, Present Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing I (Lexington Place South - Streets) p.�l F. Project 441, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing I (Westbury 3rd Addition - Streets & Utility Improvements) p IZ G. Project 435, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing / (Eagan Woods Office Park - Street & Utility Improvements) i 13H. Final Plat Approval, LeMay Lake Addition 151. Vacate Street Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Todd Jeppesen) Contract 8s-8, Final Payment/Acceptance (Blackhawk Road PImprovements) K. Contract 83-16, Final Payment/Acceptance (Sun Cliff 1st - Addition - Street & Utility Improvements) p.�� L. Contract 84-1, Final Payment/Acceptance (Lone Oak Road & I ] T.H. 55 Water Main) n,1U M. Contract 85-10, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for I Bids (Birch Park Addition - Streets & Utilities) pp 19 N. Dana's Eco Service for Rubbish Hauler License " './9 0. Indemnity Bond for Lost Coupons/Mortgage Bond Issue n r 19 P. Gambling License for Lions Club / z6Q. Proclamation for Minnesota Beautiful Month PZ(R. Final Plat Approval, Lunka Addition P' V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS .rJ5A. Project 424, LeMay Lake Addition (Streets & Utilities) r.,(IB. Vacation of Street & Utility Easement (LeMay Lake Addition) C. Multifamily Housing .Revenue Bond Application for the Kensington Place Project in the Amount of $16,000,000 (Continued from the 3-19-85 Council Meeting) VI.. OLD BUSINESS VII. VIII. IX. X. NEW BUSINESS A. Galaxie Court, M. G. Astleford, for Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot for 7 Warehouse/Storage Buildings and a Rezoning from R.B. (Roadside Business) to G.B. (General Business) for 2.7 Acres Located in Part of the NW 1/4 of Section 32 P0Lind Addition, M. G. Astleford, for Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot for 11 Warehouse/ Storage Buildings and 1 Outlot and a Rezoning from R-4 (Residential Multiple Family) to P.D. (Planned Development) for 8.5 Acres Located in Part of the NE 1/4 of Section 16 C. Final Resolution for LeMay Lake Apartments Project P Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds in, the Amount of $12,500,000 67D. Keyland Homes for a One Foot Variance from the Ten Foot Sideyard Setback Requirement for Lot 2, Block 2, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition, Section 29 70 E. Parkcliff Development for a Ten Foot Variance from the 30 Foot Frontyard Setback Requirement for Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, Parkcliff 3rd Addition, Section 34 P.74 F. Art Perri for Waiver of Plat for Lot 1, Block 2, Oak Chase 1st Addition 1� G. Forest Ridge for Revised Preliminary Plat, Don Gustafson, Consisting of Approximately 20.02 Acres and Containing 17 Lots for Multiple Development located in a Part of the Se 1/4 of the NW 1/4, Section 15 ADDITIONAL ITEMS x.93 A. Contract 85-1, Receive Bids/Award Contract (S & W Industrial Acres) 15B. Contract 85-2, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Peaceful Heights) C. Contract 85-7, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (LeMay Lake Addition — Streets & Utilities) VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) ADJOURNMENT 2 a, MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 29, 1985 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval of the March 19, 1985 regular City Council minutes and special minutes from meetings that were held on February 12, February 20, February 21, and March 12, and the agenda for the April 2, 1985 City Council meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: 40 FIRE DEPARTMENT A. Fire Department -- There are no items to be considered under Fire Department at this time. POLICE DEPARTMENT B. Police Department -- There are no items to be considered under Police Department at this time. PARK & RECREATION DEPARTMENT C. Park & Recreation Department -- There are no items to be con- sidered under Park Department at this time. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT D. Public Works Department -- The City Administrator will be reviewing items that relate to the Public Works Department as a part of Public Works Department Business. 1. Project 317/Blackhawk Road for Damage Claim by Robert Krueger -- At the March 19 City Council meeting, minutes of the Public Works Committee of the City Council dated March 5 were reviewed. Mr. Krueger objected to the committee's recommendation to offer $3,000 toward the reconstruction of the driveway to provide a more gentle slope by removing the existing "landing area" in front of Mr. Krueger's garage. Mr. Krueger appeared at the City Council meeting and expressed objection to the fact that he was not made aware of the Public Works Committee meeting and also stated he felt that $3,000 was not adequate for the damages caused to his property. The Public Works Committee scheduled another meeting which was held on March 26, 1985 to review the driveway with Mr. Krueger. The discusson that is reported in the. attached minutes of the March 5 meeting was basically the same dialogue that transpired at the Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Two March 26 Public Works Committee meeting. The minutes are enclosed on pages -.3 through Mr. Krueger feels the City -should split the difference of $20,264 or, in other words, the City's por- tion for his claim to damages would amount to $10,132. The commit- tee did not recommend a dollar amount different than the $3,000 that was reported at the March 5, 1985 City Council meeting. Mr. Krueger was directed to appear at the City Council meeting on April 2 and the claim for damages will again be reviewed with the City Council. At the present time, the committee's recommendation is $3,000 to be paid to Mr. Krueger for damages resulting in the slope caused to his driveway resulting from street and utility improve- ments installed under Project 317. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:. To review the claim for damages as submitted by Mr. Krueger and approve/modify the recom- mendation of the Public Works Committee. Special Note: Those present at the Public Works Committee meeting which was held at 5:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 26, included its chair- man, City Councilmemeber Wachter; Councilmember Thomas; City Administrator Tom Hedges; and Bob Rosene and Jerry Bourdon of the consulting engineering firm. Mr. Krueger, the property owner, was also present. A set of minutes of the Public Works Committee meeting will be prepared for the official record. 11 _7 MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE OF THE CITY COUNCIL C,.. EAGAN, MINNESOTA MARCH 5, 1985 A special meeting of the Public works Committee of the City Council was held on Tuesday, March 5, 1985, at 4:00 P.M. in the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were: Council member Ted Wachter (Chairman), Council member Jerry Thomas, Public Works Director Tom Colbert and Consulting Engineer Bob Rosene. AGENDA ITEM Review claim for damages in the amount of $20,264.00 as submitted by Robert D. Kruger, 4290 Blackhawk Road, resulting from street and utility improvements installed under Project 317. • DISCUSSION Bob Rosene presented details pertaining to the history of the design of the project and explained how the final street elevation design was subsequently raised approximately 5' from the original preliminary design and the alignment was shifted 10' further to the west to minimize the driveway slope to Mr. Kruger's property. This resulted in a 36' boulevard from back of curb to Mr. Kruger's property line as compared to a 16' boulevard along the west side of Blackhawk Road. This results in an additional 20' of boulevard width/green area available to Mr. Kruger than what previously existed prior to the improvement. The original design also proposed a service drive with a retaining wall to be located along the east side of Blackhawk Road adjacent to the Kruger and Flogsted property. However, through neighborhood meetings with the property owners, this service road/retaining wall concept was deleted at the request of .the property owners. In addition, during construction in response to Mr. Kruger's complaint pertaining to the steepness of his driveway, the project was expanded to include the construction of a "hammerhead" turnaround at the base of his driveway to provide an additional parking spot for Mr. Kruger at his specific request in considera- tion of the steeper driveway slope. The Committee then discussed the estimated cost ($3,000.00) required to reconstruct the driveway to provide a more gentle slope by removing the existing "landing area" in front of Mr. Kruger's garage. By sloping the driveway from 15' in back of curb to 5' in front of the driveway, the resulting slope would be approximately 12.08 as compared to the existing 13.5%. This would result in a maximum reduction of 1�' at the point of the "landing area". The slope of his driveway before the Blackhawk Road improvement was approximately 10.5% for comparison purposes. MA Minutes of the Public Works Committee of the City Council March 5, 1985 ;. Page 2 RECOMMENDATION It was a recommendation of the Public Works Committee that the City offer a settlement of $3,000.00 in response to the claim submitted in consideration for the estimated cost to reconstruct the driveway to a more acceptable 12% slope. This recommendation is to be presented to the City Council at the March 19, 1985, meeting for formal consideration and approval. ADJOURN The Public Works Committee meeting adjourned at 5:10 P.M. • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Three There are eighteen items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one resolution by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the consent agenda and placed under additional items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. Personnel Items: 1. Rita Cordell, Dispatcher Trainee, Resignation -- Rita Cordell, • a dispatcher trainee has resigned effective March 2.6, 1985. The Police Department is in the process of advertising for a replace- ment. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Dispatcher Trainee Rita Cordell. 2. Utility Maintenance Supervisor/Treatment Plant Operator -- The City Administrator and Superintendent of Utilities interview six applicants for the position of Utility Maintenance Supervisor/Treat- ment Plant Operator on Tuesday, March 26, 1985. There is a final interview scheduled for Monday, April 1, 1985, at 3:00 p.m. The City Administrator will brief the City Council as a part of the Administrative Agenda on Monday, April 1, as to which applicant will be recommended for the position. There are at least three candidates who are highly qualified for the position. This position • is budgeted for 1985 and the job description was approved recently by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the individual recommended by the City Administrator as a part of the Administra- tive Agenda for the position of Utility Maintenance Supervisor/ Treatment Plant Operator. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Four CONTRACTOR LICENSES B. Contractor Licenses -- Enclosed on page is a list of con- tractors who are renewing or who have been selected and retained as a builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside in Eagan. They have references from other municipalities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of con- tractor licenses as presented. • • I APRIL 2, 1985 CITY COUNCIL MEETING lI7IU71:1 t.1 \iY::MN: 1. ANDERSON-SODERMAN, INC 2. E. BARLOW & SONS CONSTRUCT 3. MARK CALVIN CONSTRUCTION 4. GENE ELDEEN CONSTRUCTION 5. GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT CO. 6. MARK JOHNSON CONST. 7. PAUL V4ILENTINY CONST. HEATING & VENTILATING: • 1. J&B SnT• 2. KLEVE HEATING & A/C, INC. 1. ED BROWN PLUMBING 2. CIARK PLUMBING 3. D.C. MECHANICAL 4. OL -BERG CONSTRUCTION 5. PEIINE PLUMBING & HEATING 6. PODANY PLUMBING 7. SCHULTIES PLUMBING 0 I Agenda Information April 2, 1985 City Page Five Memo Council Meeting FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/LEXINGTON SQUARE C. Project 433, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Lexington square 2nd Addition - Utility Improvements) - Council received a petition for trunk storm and sanitary sewer imnprovements within the Lexington Square 2nd Addition on February 5, 1985, and authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of trunk storm and sanitary sewer within this development. The feasibility report for this project has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for review in scheduling the public hearing to be held on May 7, • 1985. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 433 (Lexington Square 2nd Addition - trunk storm and sanitary sewer improvements) and order the public hearing to be held on May 7, 1985. �J ro Y Agenda information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Six FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/WINDTREE 4TH ADDN. D. Project 437, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public 'Hearing (Windtree 4th Addition - Street and Utility Improvements) -- On March 5, 1985, Council accepted the petition for this project from the owner and 'developer of the proposed Windtree 4th Addition requesting the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Windtree 4th Addition. The feasibility report has been completed. _Staff recommends May 7, 1985, for the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive report for Project 437 (Windtree 4th Addition utility improvements) and order a public hearing May 7, 1985. G the feasibility - streets and to be held on • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Seven FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/LEXINGTON PLACE S. E. Project 438, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Lexington Place South - Street Improvements) -- On March 5, 1985, Council accepted a petition from U.S. Homes Corporation for street improvements within the Lexington Place South Addition and ordered the preparation of a feasibility report. The feasibility report for this project has now been completed. Staff recommends a May 7, 1985, hearing date for the public hearing. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 438 (Lexington Place South - street improvements) and order the public hearing to be held on May 7, 1985. • /d Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Eight FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/WESTBURY 3RD ADDN. r F. Project 441, Feceive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Westbury 3rd Addition - Streets and Utility Improvements) -- On March 19, 1985, Council accepted a petition from the developer and owner of the Wesbury 3rd Addition to prepare a feasibility report for this project incoporat'ing the construction of streets and utilities. This feasibility report has now been completed. Staff recommends May 7, 1985, for the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility • report for Project 441 (Westbury 3rd Addition - street and utility improvements) and order the public hearing to be held on May 7, 1985. • • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Nine FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARR G. Project 435, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Eagan Woods Office Park - Street and Utility Improvements) -- On February 5, 1985, Council accepted a petition from the owners and developers of the Eagan Woods Office Park to prepare a feasibility report on the installation of street and utility improvements within this development. The feasibility report has been completed. Staff recommends a May 7, 1985, public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS report for Project 435 (Eagan utility improvements) and order May 7, 1985. ITEM: To receive the feasibility Woods Office Park - street and the public hearing to be held on Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Ten FINAL PLAT/LEMAY LAKE H. Approve Final Plat, LeMay Lake Addition (Opus) -- We have received an application for final plat approval for the LeMay Lake Addition located south of Lone Oak Road between the Poppler Addition and I -35E. A copy of the proposed final plat is enclosed on page � _ for the Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval of January 15, 1985, have been satisfactorily complied with through this final plat application. All application materials and submittals have been reviewed and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for LeMay Lake 1st Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. /3 • • EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE IST ADDITION 0 N $ ��-Q-�.� ..—t•—._ +w anr.u+�a�r..•� at VICINITY YAP IIC 0.1 21.w 23 d fl ` I l_ � •..,.. uV I w—�� w / w —.�. a rl Y a .nN T\ • mu PLACE �� EXHIBIT 11Aa rye ;�E�'" ; • o I SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS .C. 0 rn X 1 , ny t� LL P K r � y LL! s -! �y c IC11i 101 U L1 LJ _ F F Wq0'• T +r• N r.. .1• EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE IST ADDITION 0 N $ ��-Q-�.� ..—t•—._ +w anr.u+�a�r..•� at VICINITY YAP IIC 0.1 21.w 23 d fl ` I l_ � •..,.. uV I w—�� w / w —.�. a rl Y a .nN T\ • mu PLACE �� EXHIBIT 11Aa rye ;�E�'" ; • o I SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS .C. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Eleven VACATE STREET EASEMENT/PETITION/PUBLIC HEARING/TODD JEPPESEN I. Vacate Street Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Todd Jeppesen) -- Mr. Jeppesen of 4955 Pilot Knob Road is submitting a petition to vacate a highway easement upon which his house is located. Staff has researched the reason for the particular location of the highway easement and found that an error was made at the County in preparing the legal description for this easement. Apparently, this easement was supposed to have been described off the center line of Pilot Knob Road rather • than the section line as was recorded. In discussions with the County, it appears the County still requires a slope easement in this area. Staff would recommend that as a condition of vacating this easement, Mr. Jeppesen sign a slope easement required by the County based on the correct legal description. However, this can be done at the time of public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the petition to vacate the existing highway easement on Mr. Jeppesen's property and order the public hearing to be held on April 16, 1985. FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/BLACKHAWK ROAD IMPROVEMENTS J. Contract 83-8, Final Payment/Acceptance (Blackhawk Road • Improvements) -- We have received a request for final payment from the contractor through our consulting engineering firm along with a verification statement of compliance with City approved plans and specifications for the construction and completion of the road improvements under Project 317 and 355 and trunk storm sewer construction under Project 354. All final inspections have been performed and verified by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for final approval and acceptance by Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the eighth and final payment in the amount of $478.09 to Keller Construction for Contract 83-8 (Blackhawk Road improvements) and authorize the acceptance for perpetual maintenance. /d Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twelve FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/SUN CLIFF 1ST ADDN. R. Contract 83-16, Final Payment/Acceptance (Sun Cliff 1st Addition - Street and Utility Improvements) -- We have received a request for final. payment from the contractor through our consulting engineering firm along with the verification statement of compliance with the City approved plans and specifications for the construction and completion of streets and utilities within the Sun Cliff 1st Addition. All final inspections have been performed and verified by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for final approval and acceptance by Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS final payment in the amount Construction for Contract 83-16 and utility improvements) and perpetual maintenance. ITEM: To approve the seventh and of $7,291.50 to Burschville Sun Cliff 1st Addition - streets authorize the acceptance for • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Thirteen FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/LONE OAK ROAD & T.H. 55 WATER MAIN L. Contract 84-1, Final Payment/Acceptance (Lone Oak Road & T.H. 55 Water Main) --We have received a request for final payment from the Contractor through our consulting engineering firm along with a verification statement of compliance with City approved plans and specifications for the construction and completion of water main along T.H. 55, T.H. 149 and Pilot Knob Road and .I -35E. Also included in construction was a storm sewer outlet for Pond DP -12. The water main was completed under Project 391 and the storm • sewer under 410. All final inspections have been performed and verified by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for final approval and acceptance by Council action. ACTION TO HE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 7th and final payment in the amount of $5,012.08 to W & G Rehbein Construction for Contract 84-1 (Lone Oak Road and T.H. 55 - water main) and authorize the acceptance for perpetual maintenance. L Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Fourteen CONTRACT 85-10/ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS/BIRCH PARK ADDITION M. Contract 85-10, Approve Plans & Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Birch Park Addition - Streets & Utilities) - Detailed plans and specifications for providing for the installation of streetsand utilities to service the Birch Park Addition have been completed and are being presented to the Council approval along with a request for authorization to advertise for a bid opening. With the exception ofthree temporary slope easements, all other easements and right-of-way necessary for the installation of this contract are available through the final platting of the Birch Park Addition. The temporary easements to be obtained are along the southside of Deerwood Drive. Although these temporary slope easements would be desirable to obtain according to our consulting engineers they are not absolutely necessary for the construction of Deerwood Drive. without these slope easements a minor modification to the slope will be required along with some minor retaining walls to stay within the existing right-of-way. Our consulting engineers and City Attorney's office are pursuing obtaining the desirable temporary easements, however, if they should fail in their attempt to obtain these easements, the project can still be built. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 85-10 (Birch Park Addition Street and Utility Improvements) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, May 2, 1985. Nil • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Fifteen RUBBISH HAULER LICENSE N. Dana's Eco SErvice for Rubbish Hauler License -- Dana Turner of Burnsville has applied for a rubbish hauler license. Mr. Turner is currently licensed under the name Dana's Eco Service in Blooming- ton, Savage and Lakeville. He has paid for two trucks and provided copies of a bond insurance and rate schedule. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the rubbish hauler's license for Dana Turner of Burnsville, who is operating a business under the name Dana's Eco Service. • INDEMNITY BOND/LOST.COUPONS O. Indeminity Bond for Lost Counpons/Mortgage Bond Issue -- The Director of Finance has received a request from the City's paying agent, First Bank St. Paul, for lost coupons that were issued for the first housing mortgage revenue bond series in 1979. This project relates to, the Coachman Oaks project. Some minutes have been prepared by legal counsel on behalf of the City's paying agent outlining a resolution that authorizes payment of interest in lieu of issuance of duplicate coupon. The paying agent is not authorized to pay the indemnity bond in lieu of lost coupons without proper authorization by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize proper execution of an indemnity bond for the lost coupons relating to the Coachman Oaks Company project first mortgage housing revenue bonds to the . paying agency department of First Bank St. Paul. GAMBLING LICENSE/LIONS CLUB P. Gambling License for Lions Club -- An application for a gambling license was submitted by the Eagan Lions Club requesting that bingo, tip board, paddle wheel and raffle events be allowed at the Diamond T Ranch on Saturday, April 13, 1985. The Lions Club has been approved by the State Gambling Commission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a gambling license for the Eagan Lions Club for an event scheduled on April 13, 1985 at the Diamond T Ranch. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Sixteen PROCLAMATION/MINNESOTA BEAUTIFUL MONTH Q. Proclamation for Minnesota Beautiful Month -- Enclosed is a copy of a request from Governor Rudy Perpich to proclaim May 1985 to be Minnesota Beautiful Month. A copy of the proclamation is enclosed on pages 1/ through yv . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize Mayor Blomquist to proceed with proclaiming the month of May as Minnesota Beautiful Month. .9 • RUDY PERPICH GOVERNOR February 28, 1985 Dear Mayor: S'T'ATE OF MEWNESOTA OFPRE OP THE GOVRTWOR ST. PAUL 66166 In keeping with Minnesota's reputation as the state with the good life, I have proclaimed May 1985 to be Minnesota Beautiful • Month. During the month of May, the Minnesota Beautiful Program will organize Minnesotans in a statewide effort to improve their communities. I am hoping that every community throughout the state will participate with their own cleanup, recycling and beautification programs. One of the most important things we can do to facilitate a healthy economy is to make Minnesota a more attractive and pleasing place to live, work and do business. We cannot have a sound economy without a sound environment. I feel that you, as a leader in your community, can be instrumental in encouraging citizens to undertake environmental cleanup projects. All of us have a stake in preserving the . natural beauty of our state, and I know that Minnesota works best when it harnesses the talents and energies of its people. I have asked Frank Ongaro (297-3190) and Nick Riley (297-4736) of the Environmental Resources Development office to, be available for any questions you may have about participation in Minnesota Beautiful Month, and I encourage you to contact them before initiating cleanup projects within your community. Sincerely, 4RU PERPI Governor AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ProdarnafiQn WHEREAS: The State of Nlnnemto is rich In natural resources and beauty: and WHEREAS: Every citl:en mould make a diligent effort to keeo we maranment clean and healthful by Wrktna together to preserve clean air. fresh Wier and the natural beauty of our note; and WHEREAS: Alinnesoo Beautiful Month is organising Mbmesorans in a sotewide effon to improve . the community mvironmmt try astabBlEhg recycling engrams. clean up efforts. Landscaping. beautification and tree planting; and WHEREAS: Minnesota Beautiful committee. a group of public and prlwte wonteen. ongimted Minnesota Beautiful Month to focw attention an the efforts of concerned k inneeotons; NOW. THEREFORE. 1. Rudv Peroich. Governor of the State of Minnesota. do hereby orocluim the month o/ May IDBS. to be In Minnesota. end ask all citlserus from buatneeas. civic groups. goveremmt agencies and other organizations to sort together to proaerve the natural beauty of sue tote rot only wing M4mesota • Beautiful .Month, pd throughout Na year. SECRETARY OF STATE IN WITNESS .HEAEOF. I nave hereunto sat my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State of Minnesota to be affixed at the State Capitol this twenty-seventh day of November In the year of aur Lora one thousand nine hundred and eighty-four, and of the State the one hundred twenty-seventh. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Seventeen FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, LUNKA ADDITION R, Final Plat Approval, Lunka Addition --We have received an application for a final plat approval for the Lunka Addition located south of Towerview Road between Pilot Knob Road and Quarry Lane. A copy of the proposed final plat is enclosed on page � for the Council's reference. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval of October 30, 1984, have been satisfactorily complied with through this final plat application. All application materials and submittals have been reviewed and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council action. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Lunka Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • ,�3 - -- --H prw xe-E � �u[i w wi ee] eq, W Gi WI 001 Zlr if wl/1 .t\ I Is DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: AL 5 eEING 5 FEFT IN WIDTH, UNLESS OT4ERxISE INDICATED AND AD,'OINING LCT LINES IANC 10 FE=T IN WIDTH,UNLESS OTHERWISL IN'�_ATEC, AND ADJOINING STREET LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. i I / wiz+ I/i is mea"o• sei .o."T z�., :e w a : TOWERVIEW ROAD s A _V_ 4 r-- „E ]G e yl I I I9 2 BLOT k I K I loo oa I I. � O t0 0 Oj O O O Z ep zr a oa ..e e.�i z,e zn .eer wToame fEC. W, i.3Tu.• Y. i1. i 218.20- uuG a ,M_N a.r T.E w ey...o apGf ei TrG u w.,H N 89.44' 28" E ""'G ""�'%z sv. •^.+. ET"• azo. L I "OeM No zu LE NORTH SCALE: 1"- 501 0 50 100 I O 200 SOLE a FEET OOENOTES 1/2 INCH BY IS INCH IRON MONUMENT SET -MARRED WITH REGISTRATION NO. 16085 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN } THE SOUGH LINE OF THE N,W_ ve OF THE N.W. 114 0- SEC 10. VICINITY MAP ,A -- SECTION 10, T. 27 h, R.20 W. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Eighteen 424, LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION (STREETS & UTILITIE A. Project 424, LeMay Lake 1st Addition (Street and Utility Improvements) --In response to a petition submitted by the developers of the proposed LeMay Lake lst Addition, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of the required streets and utilities for this proposed development. This feasibility report was completed and presented to the Council on March 19, 1985. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners proposed • to a assessed under this project. Enclosed on pages „y through is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. The consulting engineer and Acting City Engineer will be available to answer any questions or concerns raised as a result of this presentation. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the installation of streets and utilities under Project 424 for the LeMay Lake 1st Addition. 714:� REPORT ON LeMAY LAKE ' 1st ADDITION 0 UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 424 mo EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1985 /� /� Comm: 49841 //�� /3o.cedUd, RO"Ks, !�%d�a a fYd 4c&k4, Yom St P"4 Mb moeota ,Z/ SJ. P..l, hf:.r.rev I PAa.. 6t2-636-4600 March 5, 1985 Honorable Mayor 6 Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Re: LeMay Lake lot Addition Utility and Street Improvements Project No. 424 Our File No. 49341 Dear Mayor and Council: Orr. rr. Bon.rroo, P.E. Robnl W. R.rnr, P.E. J.ePh C. Andblih. P.E Bmdlord A. Lemberg, P.E. Rlrhard E. turner. P.E. James C. Olson. P.E. chmm R. Cook. P.E. Rel/A A- Gordon. P.E. Thom. E. Noyes. P.E. RlshaM W. F.mr, P.E. R.&I, G. 9shuniahl, P.E. Momin L. Sorala. P.E. Donald C. 8argoM1. P.E. Jerry A. Bcumo.. P.E. Mark A. Ha.on. P.E. TM A. f4m. P. E. Michael T. Rawmann. P.E. R.her, R. Pyr/fele, P.E. Daum 0. Loskmm P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Pa"Uky Harlan M. Oboe Transmitted herewith is our report for LeMay Lake lot Addition, Utility and Street Improvements, Project No. 424. This report discusses utility and street improvements within and adjacent to LeMay Lake lot Addition and presents cost estimates for these improvements. Also included is a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00,/RO,SSEENEE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, �lGv�1- Tom` evi �. Mark( A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of^the / State of Minnesota. rl Mark A. Hanson INC. Dat e: March 5. 1985 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works Date: 6393c "2 `-7 • 0 SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of utilities and street to service LeMay Lake lot Addition. Also included is construction of a lateral storm sewer from LeMay Lake to the north side of Lone Oak Road (Co. Rd. No. 26), to provide additional storm sewer capacity to Eagandale Center Industrial Park. LeMay Lake let Addition consists of 3 multiple buildings containing 288 dwelling unite. LeMay Lake lot Addition is located on the south side of Lone Oak Road westerly of I -35E. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible froman engineering standpoint and is in accordance with Master Utility and Street Plan for the • City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can beat be carried out a one contract. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - It is proposed to extend an 8" PVC sanitary sewer easterly from an existing sanitary sewer manhole located along the west line of LeMay Lake lot Additions. The sanitary sewer will be extended easterly through LeMay Lake lot Addition and southerly within Eagandale Place. The sanitary sewer will be constructed at a proper elevation to serve the abutting property • along Eagandale Place. Services will be constructed to 5 feet of each build- ing complex in the LeMay Lake Addition. Water Main - It is proposed to extend an 8" DIP water main southerly in Eagan - dale Place as shown on the attached drawing. The 8" water main will connect to an existing stub provided at Lone Oak Road. A combination of 8" and 6" water main will be constructed through LeMay Lake lot Addition providing not only water service but also proper fire protection. LeMay Lake lot Addition is located in .the intermediate pressure zone. Static and residual pressures are 62 and 38 psi respectively at Lone Oak Road and Eagandale Place. These pressures will be higher as.you approach LeMay Lake. Services will be con— structed to 5 feet of each building complex in the LeMay Lake Additon. Page 1. 6393c -7d Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein provides for extending a 54" RCP storm sewer in Eagandale Place from LeMay Lake to and across Lone Oak Road. The 54" RCP is not only sized to convey drainage from the adjacent property along Eagandale Place but also to provide additional storm sewer capacity to Eagandale Center Industrial Park. The existing 48" RCP which presently serves the Eagandale Center Industrial Park was properly sized at the time of its construction. However, rainfall intensities and the runoff coefficient for this area have increased. Rainfall intensities for a 5 year design storm have increased nearly 28%. The anticipated runoff coefficient which composes the impervious surface along with those areas which are pervious has also in- • creased nearly 30%. Therefore, the combination of a newly constructed 54" RCP in conjunction with the existing 48" RCP will provide this area with a storm sewer system designed for nearly a 5 year storm. Catch basins will also be constructed from the 54" RCP to convey drainage within Eagandale Place. A 24" RCP storm sewer will be extended westerly from the 54" RCP located in Eagandale Place in LeMay Lake 1st Addition. This storm sewer will be ex- tended to the west property line of the LeMay Lake let Addition to provide drainage from a low area located immediately to the west. Storm sewer leads. • and catch basins will be extended from the 24" RCP by the developer to provide drainage internally within LeMay Lake let Addition. A portion of the existing 48" RCP storm sewer will have to .be relocated at the southeast corner of the most southeasterly building. Also included is construction of a skimming tank which the newly constructed storm sewer will discharge into. The skimming tank will retain large debris and floatables such as paper, empty cans, organ- ic litter and .oil. However, because it is not proposed to remove these mater- ials by mechanical means, the skimming tank will have to be visually inspected periodically by the City along with the removal of any materials found at that time. Page 2. 6393c ,-%CJ Street - It is proposed to construct Eagandale Place southerly 900 feet from Lone Oak Road and a small portion of concrete sidewalk along Lone Oak Road as shown on the attached drawing. Eagandale Place will be constructed 48' wide at Lone Oak Road and taper down to 36' wide at the first easterly street stub. The remaining street width will be 36' to the southerly end. It is proposed to construct Eagandale Place to a 9 ton design thickness. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: The area to be included for construction and assessment purposes is listed below. No construction will occur outside of those areas proposed to be assessed. • . ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA LeNay Lake 1st Addition Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2 Eagandale Center Industrial Park Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, Block 4 Lot 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 (200-05), Block 5 Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Block 6 • Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 6 Lot 1, Block 1 NW 1/4, Section 10 Parcel 020-26 Parcel 030-26 NE 1/4, Section 10 Parcel 010-01 Parcel 010-04' Page 3. 6393c -�o COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: Sanitary Sewer $103,660 Water Main 107,980 Storm Sewer 448,440 Street 92,630 TOTAL ................... $752,710 The total estimated project cost is $752,710 which includes contingencies • and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited pro- perty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral costs including overhead will be revised based on final costs. SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess sanitary sewer on a front foot basis. The sanitary sewer included entirely within LeMay Lake lat Addition • will be assessed to Lot 1, Block 2. The sanitary sewer in Eagandale Place will be assessed entirely against the unplatted parcel (020-26) located on the east side of Eagandale Place. It is proposed however that the sanitary sewer overdepth in LeMay 1st Addition required to serve Parcel 020-26.be assessed to Parcel 020-26. Trunk area sanitary sewer has previously been assessed. WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess water main on a front foot basis. The water main in Eagandale Place from Lone Oak Road to the first easterly stub street will be assessed evenly between Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 LeMay Lake 1stAddition. The remaining water main in Eagandale Place will be as Page 4. 6393c 3/ sessed entirely against the unplatted parcel (020-26) located on the east side. The water main included within Lot 1, Block 2 LeMay Lake lat Addition will be assessed entirely to Lot 1, Block 2. It is also proposed to assess lateral benefit from trunk water main for the 16" DIP in Lone Oak Road. Trunk area water main for this area was previously assessed. STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is separated into lateral and trunk storm sewer. Trunk storm sewer is limited to all costs associated with con- atruction of the skimming tank. All remaining storm sewer is considered lat- eral. Lateral storm sewer is further separated into lateral for LeMay Lake • area and lateral for Eagandale Center Industrial Park. Lateral storm sewer for LeMay Lake area is proposed to be assessed at a lineal foot rate based on a required equivalent 24" RCP including miscellaneous manholes. The lineal footage was determined by what each parcel would be required to construct as its own lateral storm sewer to LeMay Lake if the 54" RCP in Eagandale Place and the existing 48" RCP were not constructed. The estimated rate per lineal foot is $45.14. The remaining lateral storm sewer which equals the total storm sewer cost minus the trunk storm sewer and the lateral storm sewer for requested by representatives of the owners (Opus, Northwestern Mutual Life In- surance Company, Alscor Investors, Inc.). It is also proposed to assess trunk area storm sewer to those parcels south of Lone Oak Road which have not been previously assessed as shown on the attached drawing. STREET: It is proposed to assess •all street costs associated with Eagandale Place equally to the abutting property on a front foot basis. Page 5. 6393c 3z LeMay Lake area is proposed to be assessed on an area basis to the undeveloped. parcels located north of Lone Oak Road in Eagandale Center Industrial Park as requested by representatives of the owners (Opus, Northwestern Mutual Life In- surance Company, Alscor Investors, Inc.). It is also proposed to assess trunk area storm sewer to those parcels south of Lone Oak Road which have not been previously assessed as shown on the attached drawing. STREET: It is proposed to assess •all street costs associated with Eagandale Place equally to the abutting property on a front foot basis. Page 5. 6393c 3z TRUNK ASSESSMENT: All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. Trunk asseassment rates will be assessed based on the rates in effect at the time of the public hearing. Trunk assessment rates proposed to be assessed as part of this project are listed below: Water Main Lateral Benefit from Trunk -(Multi -Family) $19.57/f.f. Storm Sewer Trunk Area - Single Family $0.048/s.f. Multi -Family $0.061/s.f. Commercial -Industrial $0.072/9.f. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: A.) Sanitary Sewer Lateral Lateral Assessment B.) Water Main Lateral Lateral Assessment Lateral Benefit from Trunk C.) Storm Sewer Lateral Trunk Lateral Assessment Trunk Area 6393c Project Cost Revenue Balance $103,660 $103,660 $103,660 $103,660 - 0 - $107,980 $107,980 11,801 $107,980 $119,781 +$11,801 $407,490 40,950 $407,490 104,100 $448,440 $511,590 +$63,150 Page 6. -'�3 • • D.) Street Lateral $ 92,630 Lateral Assessment $ 92,630 $ 92,630 $ 92,630 - 0 - TOTAL..................................................... The anticipated project balance is +$74,951. PROJECT SCHEDULE • Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 7. 6393c +$74,951 March 19, 1985 April 2, 1985 April 2, 1985 May 2, 1985 May 7, 1985 August 16, 1985 September 1985 May 1986 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE LEMAY LAKE IST ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 424 A.) SANITARY SEWER 1,800 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. $ 54,000 200 Lin.ft. 6" PVC Sanitary sewer service in pl. @ $9.00/lin.ft, 1,800 8 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 7,200 110 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $70.00/lin.ft. 7,700 12,0 Lin.ft. 8" DIP outside drop @ $130.00/lin.ft. 1,560 1 Each 811x6" wye branch @ $60.00/each 60 8 Lin.ft. 6' CISP riser in pl. @ $15.00/lin.ft, 120 1 Each Connect 8" PVC to ex. MH 0500.00/each 500 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 2,000 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,000 Total $ 75,940 +5% Contingencies 3,800 $ 79,740 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin, b Bond Interest 23,920 A.) TOTAL SANITARY SEWER .......................... $103,660 B.) WATER MAIN 2,050 Lin.ft. 8" DIP Water main in pl. @ $14.00/lin.ft. $ 28,700 1,550 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 18,600 9 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $950.00/each 8,550 6 Each 8" Resilient wedge gate valve @ $450.00/each 2,700 6 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve @ $400.00/each 2,400 8,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.20/lb. 9,600 1 Each Wet tap 8" DIP to ex, 16" DIP @ $1,500.00/each 1,500 6393c Page 8. 3-5 • • B.) WATER MAIN (CONT'D) 1 Each Connect 8" dIP to ex. 8" CIP @ $500.00/each 500 LUMP SUM Patch bituminous pavement @ $2,000.00/L.S. 2,000 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 3,550 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 3,550 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. Total $ 79,100 150 Lin.ft. +5% Contingencies 3,960 120 Lin.ft. $ 83,060 60,000 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest 24,920 B.) TOTAL WATER MAIN $107,980 • C.) STORM SEWER 1,180 Lin.ft. 54" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $150.00/lin.ft. $177,000 670 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 20,100 40 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 960 150 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 3,300 120 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 54" RCP in pl. @ $500.00/lin.ft. 60,000 2 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 1,800 6 Each Std. 6' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,500.00/each 9,000 5 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @$800.00/each 4,000 65 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp, in pl. (6' dia.) @ $120.00/lin.ft. 7,800 • 250 Lin.ft. Remove and relay 48" RCP storm sewer @ $50.00/lin.ft. 12,500 . LUMP SUM Skimming structure @ $30,000.00/L.S. 30,000. 2,060 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,060 Total $328,520 +5% Contingencies 16,430 $344,950 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin, b Bond Interest 103,490 C.) TOTAL STORM SEWER ............................ 1. $448,440 Page 9. 6393c D.) STREET 300 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. $ 900 300 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 1,800 5,000 Sq.yde. Subgrade preparation @ $0.40/sq.yd. 2,000 2,450 Ton Claes 5 100% Crushed quarry rock @ $7.00/ton 17,150 800 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @ $12.00/ton 9,600 400 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $14.00/ton 5,600 65 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $210.00/ton 13,650 250 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.20/gal. 300 2,060 Lin,ft. B618 Concrete curb & gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 10,300 220 Lin.ft, concrete sidewalk @ $7.00/lin.ft. 1,540 200 Lin.ft. Reinforcing for concrete curb S gutter @ $0.50/lin.ft. 100 9 Each Adjust MH and CB frame @ $150.00/each 1,350 4 Each Adjust gate valve & box @ $100,00/each 400 2 Each Permanent barricade @ $400.00/each 800 100 Cu.yds. Select topsoil borrow @ $9.00/cu.yd. 900 2.0 Acres Seed w/fertilizer & mulch @ $730.00/Ac. 1,460 Total $ 67,350 +5% Contingencies 3,400 $,71,250 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 21,380 6393c D.) TOTAL STREET ................................... $ 92,630 6'P yffvF. V4 A. SANITARY SEWERa+ B. WATER 14AIN C. STORM SEWER D. STREET TOTAL ........................ Page 10. 29 7 $103,660 107,980 448,440 92,630 $752,710 • • APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEMAY LAKE IST ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 424 b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel A. SANITARY SEWER Total Description Footage Parcel Assessable LEMAY LAKE IST ADDN. Total Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment $ 2,818 LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDN. 459 F.F. $19.57/F.F. 8,983 Lot 1, 31ock 2 1,640 F.F. $33.77 $ 55,383 • NW 1/4, SECTION 10 Parcel 020-26 1,320 F.F. $33.77 44,577 Parcel 020-26 (Overdepth) 450 F.F. 8.22 3,700 2,960 F.F. $103,660 B. WATER MAIN a) Lateral Parcel Assessable Total Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDN. Lot 1, Block 1 405 F.F. $15.21 $ 6,159 Lot 1, Block 2 5,595 F.F. $15.21 85,092 • NW 1/4, SECTION 10 Parcel 020-26 1,100' $15.21 $ 16.729 7,100 F.F. $106,638 b) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel Assessable Total Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment LEMAY LAKE IST ADDN. Lot 1, Block 1 144 F.F. $19.57/F.F. $ 2,818 Lot 1, Block 2 459 F.F. $19.57/F.F. 8,983 $ 11,E01 Page 11. 6393c 3q" C. STORM SEWER a) Lateral (LeMay Lake Area) Parcel Description LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDN. Lot 1, Block 2 Lot 1, Block 2 (Remove b Relay 48" RCP) NW 1/4, SECTION 10' Parcel 020-26 Assessable Total Footage Rate/L.F. Assessment 1,260 F.F. $45.14/L.F. $ 56,876 200 F.F. $68.25/L.F. 13,650 800 F.F. $45.14 36,112 $106,638 0 • Page 12. 6393c 7 b) Lateral (Eagandale Center Industrial Park) Parcel Total Description Area Rate/Sq.Ft. Assessment EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK Lot 1, Block 4 65,120 $0.0862 $ 5,616 Lot 2, Block 4 86,950 0.0862 7,499 Lot 3, Block 4 130,610 0.0862 11,265 Lot 4, Block 4 130,610 0.0862 11,265 Lot 5, Block 4 86,950 0.0862 7,499 Lot 6, Block 4 240,000 0.0862 20,699 Lot 7, Block 4 240,000 0.0862 20,699 Lot 14, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7,501 Lot 15, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7,501 Lot 16, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7.,501 Lot 17, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7,501' • Lot 18, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7,501 Lot 19, Block 4 86,970 0.0862 7,501 Lot 8, Block 5 95,700 0.0862 8,,254 Lot 9, Block 5 78,300 0.0862 6,753 Lot 10, Block 5 78,300 0.0862 6,753 Lot 11, Block 5 78,300 0.0862 6,753 Lot 13, Block 5 275,740 0.0862 23,781 Lot 14, Block 5 348,400 0.0862 30;048 Lot 16, Block 5 179,030 0.0862 15,441 Lot 17, Block 5 84,070 0.0862 7,251 Lot 18, Block 5 88,430 0.0862 7,627 Lot 19, Block 5 87,120 0.0862 7,514 Lot 20 (200-05), Block 5 42,690 0.0862 3,682 Lot 1, Black 6 33,980 0.0862 2,931 Lot 2, Block 6 112,390 0.0862 9,693 Lot 3, Block 6 100,620 0.0862 8,678 Lot 4, Block 6 129,370 0.0862 11,157 • Lot 5, Block 6 82,760 0.0862 7,137 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 6 Lot 1, Block 1 91,040 $0.0862 $ 7,851 TOTAL 3,488,300 $300,852 Page 13. 6393c c) Trunk Area Parcel Area Description (Sq.ft.) LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Rate Lot 1, Block 1 37,800 Lot 1, Block 2 755,340 NW 1/4, SECTION 10 $0.072/sq.ft. Parcel 029-26 278,750 Parcel 020-26 80,500 Parcel 030-26 200,000 NE 1/4, SECTION 10 $0.061/sq.ft. Parcel 010-01 224,750 Parcel 010-01 30,500 Parcel 010-04 6,800 D. STREET Parcel Description LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2 NW 1/4. SECTION 10 Parcel 020-26 Assessable Credit Area Footage Total (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Rate Assessment -- 37,800 $0.072/sq.ft. $ 2,722 -- 755,340 $0.061/sq.ft. 46,076 -- 278,750 $0.072/sq.ft. 20,070 -- 80,500 $0.061/sq.ft. 4,991 -- 200,000 $0.061/sq.ft. 12,200 -- 224,750 $0.072/sq.ft. 16,182 -- 30,500 $0.061/sq.ft. 1,860 -- 6,800 $0.061/sq.ft. 415 • $104,100 Assessable Total Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment 405 $48.07 $ 19,468 972 48.07 46,724 550 48.07 26,438 1,927 $ 92,630 Page 14. 6393c 44/ • 0 SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Vater Main Storm Sever Lateral Lateral Lateral Eagan - Parcel Sanitary Benefit from LeMay dale Center Description Sewer Lateral Trunk Lake Area Ind. Park Trunk Street Assessment LEMAY LAKE IST ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 $ 6,159 S 2,818 S 2,722 S 19,468 $ 31,167 Lot 1, Block 2 $ 55,383 85,092 8,983 $ 70,526 46,076 46,724 312,784 EACANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARR Lot 1, Block 4 $ 5,616 $ 5,616 Lot 2, Block 4 7,499 7,499 Lot 3, Block 4 11,265 11,265 Lot 4, Block 4 11,265 11,265 Lot 5, Block 4 7,499 7,499 Lot 6, Block 4 20,699 20,699 Lot 7, Block 4 20,699 20,699 Lot 14, Block 4 7,501 7,501 Lot 15, Block 4 7,501 7,501 Lot 16, Block 4 7,501 7,501 Lot 17, Block 4 - 7,501 7,501 Lot 18, Block 4 - 7,501 7,501 Lot 19, Block 4 7,501 7,501 Lot 8, Block 5 8,254 8,254 Lot 9, Block 5 6,753 6,753 Lot 10, Block 5 6,753 6,753 Lot 11, Block 5 6,753 6,753 Lot 13, Block 5 23,781 23,781 Lot 14, Block 5 30,048 30,048 Lot 16, Block 5 15,441 15,441 Lot 17, Block 5 7,251 - 7,251 Lot 18, Block 5 7,627 7,627 Lot 19, Block 5 7,514 7,514 Lot 20 (200-05), Block 5 3,682 3,682 Lot 1, Block 6 2,981 2,981 Lot 2, Block 6 9,693 9,693 Lot 3, Block 6 8,678 8,678 Lot 4, Block 6 11,157 11,157 Lot 5, Block 6 7,137 7,137 EACANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK N0. 6 Lot 1, Block 1 _ S 7,851 $ 7,851 N4 1/4, SECTION 10 Parcel 020-26 S 48,277 S 16,729 $ 36,112 S 25,061 S 26,438 $152,617 Parcel 030-26 12,200 12,200 NE 1/4, SECTION 10 Parcel 010-01 _ $ 16,042 $ 18,042 Parcel 010-04 415 415 6393c P2 n 15. 7 LONE 4 :j 6 Ems O � O I, I J Sewer LaMAY LAKE •1st. ADDITION SANITARY SEWER PROJECT No.424 112 z Q W 8 9 .. (Co. �d. 26 1 Scale in feel 0 ICO 200' 300' 400 SONE®TIOO, ROSENZ, ANARL X I AE80CIATE% ipAC. Conoedling Engfne"o DOWMa►ch, 1995 city, GO=. 49341 J. EAGAN , MINN. 7 1 19 LONE OAM ROAD ~~ 4Y,� m LeMAY LAKE 1st ADDITION WATERMAIN PROJECT No.424 O I 8 9 (Co. d. 26 I 1 I 020-2.6 BONESTWOC. ROGENE, ,1VNDERLIX A ASSOCIATE®; INC.� Csn"ItIng inglv® St. Polul, Minn. ®6twMarch, 1985 City: Com. 49341 l EAGAN , MINN. Existin 16 Watermain 44 I I Ld- 2 �nrJ •. 1 . I n 8 3 Q 4 C 6 001 5 ?il la s ~~ 4Y,� m LeMAY LAKE 1st ADDITION WATERMAIN PROJECT No.424 O I 8 9 (Co. d. 26 I 1 I 020-2.6 BONESTWOC. ROGENE, ,1VNDERLIX A ASSOCIATE®; INC.� Csn"ItIng inglv® St. Polul, Minn. ®6twMarch, 1985 City: Com. 49341 l EAGAN , MINN. 7 19 I e 9 LONE OA ROAD i ( Co. o d. 25Lp) I 1 zO I FUl URE RM SEWER ` \ V UCTURE ml ----------il Yti 3 24 cn i 1 II lJ w 1 +� 4 OL Ld 020-26 0- ® I V j i a Z jJ i :`• RELOCATE Ex. _ j) 48"R.C.P. LeMAY. L' AKE 1 sf. ADDITION STORKSEWER PROJECT No.424 4&� IMMING RUCTURE 11�Stole in feet 0 I 0 200' X00' 400' 80NESTW00. R08EA/E. Al+lt9ERLIK A AGSOCiATES. INC. Comulting EngIrcows 8t. Potol Minn. ®8t0:March, 1985 City: COMM. 49341 EAGAN , MINN. 10 7 LONE OA 4. 71F __1 tj 3 12 5 �y 6 5 WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK O I LeMAY LACE 1 s4. ADDITION STREET PROJECT No.424 d,(;, 8 9 ( Co. �d. 26 ) i I I IL 020-26 IIv I ^r[ IJ IQ 11� 9, Scale In feet l 0 10 200. 3Q0 400 ®ONESTROO. iROSENE, ANDERUX. I AGGOCIATEE, INC. Consulting Englnoors Et. Paul Minn. loasna. to:March, 1985 City: 49341 11 EAGAN , FAWN. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Nineteen VACATION/LEMAY LAKE ADDITION B. Vacation of Street & Utility Easement (LeMay Lake Addition) -- The City Attorney's office was not able to publish the hearing notice in the legal newspaper to allow proper notification. Therefore, it is recommended that this item be continued until the April 16, 1985 City Council meeting. Provisions have been made with the LeMay Lake 1st Addition final plat to include the vacation of easements as a condition of final plat approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the vacation of street and utility easements for the LeMay Lake Addition • until the April 16, 1985 City Council meeting. • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty HOUSING REVENUE BONDS/KENSINGTON PLACE C. Multi -Family Housing Revenue Bond Application for the Kensington Place Project in the Amount of $16,000,000 - Consideration for the Kensington Place Multi -Family Housing Revenue Bonds in the amount of $16,000,000 was scheduled for the March 19 City Council meeting; however, due to the lack of appraisals, it was the recommendation of Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc., that the item be continued until the April 2 meeting. Enclosed is a letter from Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc., to the president of the Stuart Corpora- tion, representing the Kensington Place Project. (Page S/ ) Since that letter was written by Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc., Mr. Nolan has contacted Marcia Cohodes to indicate that their company is not in a position to move forward with an appraisal at this early date. Therefore, they are requesting a cancellation of the public hearing and a refund of the $500 deposit with the City. A copy of a letter from Miller & Schroeder indicating action is 'enclosed on page 57.- . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a withdrawal of the request for multi -family housing revenue bonds in the amount of $16,000,000 for the Kensington Place Project as requested by the Stuart Corporation. 1i Toll Free Mlnnesote (800) 862-6002 Toll Free Other States (800) 328-6122 Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center. 7900 Xerxes Avenue South. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55431 • (612) 831-1500 March 15, 1985 Mr. Stuart Nolan, President Stuart Corporation 2177 Youngman Avenue, Suite 300 St. Paul, Minnesota 55116 Re: $16,000,000 City of Eagan • Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond (Kensington Place Project) Dear Stu: I apologize for the misunderstanding concerning the need for an appraisal prior to Council consideration for Kensington. I had thought you were going to contact Joanne Hansin and authorize her to commence a preliminary review of the project's feasibility in order for us to proceed with the preparation of the documentation necessary to receive preliminary approval for Eagan. The council has adopted guidelines in approving Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds which includes a recommendation by Miller 8 Schroeder with respect to the appraised value of the.proposed project. The Council requires us to conduct a study with a `L?I appraiser which looks at the three recognized approaches to value: • I. The Market Data approach II. The Cost Approach III. The Income Approach The Council will approve not more than 80% of the MAI appraised value of the project. It will therefore be necessary for me to meet with an appraiser of your choosing in order to expedite this process. I have asked Tom Hedges, City Administrator, to request a continuance of the public hearing scheduled for Tuesday, 'larch 19, until a date to be established once `tiller 3 Schroeder has had adequate time to review the preliminary findings of the appraiser. Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, q&wa- Marcia A. Cohodes Assistant Vice President MAC/bjh MaadVuartn♦ Mmneapoln.Mmnesola Branch 011icee'. Co.morn •Minneepoln• So•!na'axh Caldornia• Norlhwook.11lmoi.•il.Paul.,M In %ow• neple..Flonda. Can on Cin.` ada 1-0 Toll Free Minnesota (600) 6626002 Toll Free Other States t600) 328-6122 Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. Northwestern Financial Center. 7900 Xerxes Avenue South. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 • (612) 831-1500 March 21, 1985 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan • 3820 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: $16,000,000 City of Eagan, Minnesota Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Kensington Place Project) Dear Mr. Hedges: Attached please find a copy of the letter I sent to Mr. Stuart Nolan, President of the Stuart Corporation, concerning the above referenced project. Mr. Nolan has since communicated to me that he is not in the position to move forward with an appraisal at this early date • and, therefore, is requesting cancellation of the public hearing and a refund of his $500 deposit with the City. Please call me at your earliest convenience in order that I may take care of this matter on behalf of the City. Very truly yours, MILLER & SCHROEDER MUNICIPALS, INC. a� Aa �11 ta� Marcia A. Cohodes Assistant Vice President MAC/pmh Enclosure cc: Stuart H. Nolan �Y Headquarters: Minneapolis, Minnesota Branch Offices: Dov tr Minneapolis -Solana Beach, California -Sarna Monica.California•Northbrook,Illinois•St.Paul.Minnesota•Naples,Florida•Tallahassee. Flanda•Carson City. Nevada • • Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One GALAXIE COURT ADDITION/PRELIMINARY PLAT/REZONING A. Galaxie Court, M.G. Astleford, for Preliminary Plat consisting of One Lot for 7 Warehouse/Storage Buildings and a Rezoning from R.B. to G.B. for 2.7 Acres' -- A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on February 28, 1985,- to consider two (2) applications - one for a rezoning from Roadside Business to General Business, and a second application to plat the Galaxie Court Addition allowing the construction of 7 warehouse storage buildings on 2.7 acres of land located southeast of I -35E and northwest of Galaxie Avenue. Both applications were continued until the March 26 meeting to allow the City staff to review concerns relating to site lines, other community's policies, and the affect that this development would have on development in the remainder of the area. The APC did hear the matter and is con- tinuing the preliminary plat and rezoning indefinitely allowing time for the M.G. Astleford Company to consider future land acquisition and a possible resubmittal of a larger master plan for commercial development in the general area of I -35E and Galaxie Avenue. Because this item is being continued indefinitely by the Advisory Planning Commission, it will be renoticed when the development plans are again presented to the City. Minutes of the APC meeting will be enclosed on Monday with the Administra- tive Packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON was no action taken by the therefore no action is required THIS ITEM: To acknowledge there Advisory Planning Commission and by the City Council. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two PRELIMINARY PLAT/REZONING/LIND ADDITION B. Lind Addition, M.G. Astleford, for Preliminary Plat Consisting of One Lot for 11 Warehouse/Storage Buildings and One Outlot and a Rezoning from R-4, Residential Multiple Family to P.D., Planned Development, for 8.5 Acres Located in Section 16 -- A public hearing was first held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on February 28, 1985, to consider applications for a rezoning from R-4 to P.D. and a preliminary plat for the Lind Addition consisting of one lot for 11 warehouse buildings and one outlot on 8.5 acres. The APC continued the item until the March 26, 1985, APC meeting and after hearing the matter, is recommending denial to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to a report that was prepared by the Planning ,Department found on pages through 6�(o . For additional information as it relates to the action taken by the APC, a copy of those minutes will be made available on Monday as a part of the Administrative Packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the recommendation of the APC for denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning for Lind Addition. SPECIAL, NOTE: A phone call from Ray Williams of M. was received this afternoon, March 29. Mr. Williams a continuance of the above :item. The Council has the continue the item or to consider the item as scheduled. 4 ;L G. Astleford is requesting discretion to • E CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: LIND ADDITION — PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING APPLICANT: M.G. ASTLEFORD LOCATION: PART OF THE NE'y OF SECTION 16 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTI—FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 28, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 15, 1985 REPORTED BY: GREG INGRAHAM, ASST. PLANNER REVIEWED BY: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat approval of the Lind Addition consisting of 1 lot for 11 warehouse/ storage buildings and 1' outlot on 8.5 acres. The project would be located between Federal Dr. .& I -35E i mile south of Yankee Doodle Rd. The Rezoning request is to change from R-4 (residential'multiple)to`P.D. (planned development). ZONING & LAND USE: The parcel is zoned R-4 and the Land Use Guide Plan design— ates it as residential with a density of 3 — 6 units per acre. The triangular site is bordered by offices to the north, Royal Oak Circle Apartments are planned across Federal Dr. and I -35E lies to the east. The parcel is relatively flat grassland with a steep slope down to the I -35E right—of—way. The Planned Development would have a limited business use on the outlot and the mini storage use on Lot 1. CODE COMPLIANCE: The 11, storage buildings (39,100 S.F.) cover 26% of the site. They meet all the setback requirementsfrom Federal Dr. and I -35E. SITE PLANNING: Access is off of Federal Dr. directly across from the Royal Oaks Circle future driveway. Six of the storage buildings would be two story and five would be one story. The exterior construction is textured concrete Panels and concrete block. An on site manager would live on the premises in an apartment in building #1. Some landscaping is indicated on the site plan, the amount of screening should be increased on the final landscape plan. The site would be fenced with a 6' high chain link security fence. LIND ADDITION FEBRUARY 28, 1985 PAGE 2 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The existing topography is slightly rolling with the site sloping from north to south. This development is located within Major Drainage District J. Runoff from this development will collect in a small detention pond built by MnDOT across from Violet Lane. From here it will be discharged through a controlled outlet into MnDOT right-of-way and drained through the roadside ditch for I -35E down to Pond JP -5. This pond does have a positive gravity outlet to Blackhawk Lake. It is proposed to grade this development to maintain the existing drainage pattern, that being from north to south. The grading as proposed will probably preclude any future access from this site from Outlot A. The necessity of this access will be further discussed under the paragraph entitled "STREETS". The reason a future connection will. probably not be feasible with this grading plan is that this plan is lowering the north end of this lot appoximately 10 ft., while leaving the southern portion of Outlot A at existing grades. It does not appear likely that Outlot A will be lowered significantly. This is because the elevation rises to the north on Outlot A. The proposed drainage over this development is to be southerly and collected • in catch basins at the south end of this development. Staff would recommend that three catch basins be installed at the south end to pick up the runoff rather than the two as proposed. Staff feels, in reviewing this site, that a minimum of three catch basins will be required to accomodate the volume of runoff generated by the vast amount of impervious surface created by this development. This drainage would then be discharged into MnDOT's detention pond that .is immediately south of this development. However, staff recommends -this grading and drainage plan be reviewed by MnDOT and that written comments be received regarding this drainage scheme prior to final plat approval. In addition, the steep slopes resulting from grading along the east -west property line measuring 148 ft. could be reduced. This can be accomplished by requiring this developer obtain a permit from MnDOT to grade within MnDOT right-of-way. . Staff would strongly recommend this permit be pursued as a condition of final plat approval. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth exist • within Englert Road that will' provide 'future service to this proposed develop- ment. However, it will 'have ' to be extended northerly. Also, a watermain of sufficient size, capacityand depth exists within Federal Drive just north of Outlot A. This will have to be extended southerly and the crossing of Federal Drive will have to be made along with the sanitary sewer crossing. It is staff's understanding that this development is anticipating scheduling utility construction with the proposed Royal Oak Apartment development. The Royal Oak development will also require sanitary sewer being brought northerly from Englert Road and watermain being brought southerly from Federal Drive. Because Federal Drive is the only access to the Blackhawk Hills Additions, staff is recommending that all utility crossings required for this development be jacked and not open -cut. In addition, this will maintain the integrity of a newly constructed street. STREETS: Federal Drive is the only existing street which abutts this proposed development on this development's westerly boundary. Federal Drive was constructed by MnDOT as a part of the I -35E construction in the summer of 1Z LIND ADDITION FEBRUARY 28, 1985 PAGE 3 1984. From Violet Lane to Washington Avenue, it is constructed 44 ft. wide as a 9 -ton street. This development will not require any public streets at this time. As discussed under "GRADING/DRAINAGE", a connection between this lot and Outlot A appears highly unlikely due to the grading. However, staff is not convinced a connection is necessary due to the proposed use. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Right-of-way has been obtained by MnDOT for the construction of Federal Drive. No other right-of-way will be required to be dedicated with this development. Easements of sufficient, width shall be dedicated on the final plat for all utilities not located within public right-of-way. These widths shall be determined by the Engineering Department. ASSESSMENTS: Although our records indicate this parcel proposed to be developed • has been assessed for trunk area watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer, they were not assessed at the proposed commercial/industrial zoning rate. Instead, trunk area watermain was assessed at the residential zoning rate. The trunk area sanitary sewer rates are the same for all zonings. Subsequently, in accordance with the City's special assessment policy 82-1, the difference between the proposed zoning rates and previously assessed zoning rates in the year that final plat approval is received is the responsibility of this development. These assessment amounts are summarized in the following table. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE ESTIMATED 1985 RATE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY DIFFERENCE - AMOUNT Trunk Area Watermain - 3.4 Ac. $1,830/Ac. $6,222 Trunk Area Storm Sewer 148,100 s.f. 0.011/s.f. 1,629 • TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT UPGRADING DUE $7,851 Final assessments amounts will be determined using final plat areas and rates in effect at the time of final platting. These assessments are due at the time of final' platting. They will either be paid in full or spread by an executed waiver of hearing over a 15 -year period at the interest rate of the City's latest bond sale. CONDITIONS If approved, the plat shall be subJect to the following conditions: 1) A provision of the approval would be to allow an on-site residence for the caretaker. 2) The standard plat conditions and- applicable City ordinances shall be adhered to. 3) A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into between the applicant and the City with the term of the P.D. being 5 years. $7 LIND ADDITION FEBRUARY 28, 1985 PAGE 4 4) No slopes be allowed within this development steeper than 3:1. 5) Written comments from MnDOT regarding the proposed grading and drainage of this development shall be received prior to final plat approval. 6) A public improvement project for utility installation to provide service to this development shall be approved by Council prior to final plat approval. 7) Open -cutting of_ Federal Drive for the installation of utilities not be allowed. 8) This development shall be responsible. for upgrading trunk area watermain and storm sewer assessments based on rates in effect at the time of final platting. • 9) This development shall be responsible for all costs associated with providing lateral utilities to this development. R_4 NB ji 'rd RD E N 5 G B G87- RB NcmNvt"2 Z D -0 H T� IST ; P D —13;-u4 csc L..B' I JV II LROE 81-3 AIL aLACKHAWK PARK PK PILOT CENT R R, A FF OL o44. CITY K HALL PF 77-2 A SKDA4E NO R-1 S _J<OVDALE TP NEUMANN 6A 'A N FOX EPP A R 10 G rE I R_4 NB ji 'rd RD E N 5 G B G87- RB NcmNvt"2 Z D -0 H T� IST ; P D —13;-u4 csc L..B' I JV II LROE 81-3 AIL aLACKHAWK PARK PK PILOT CENT R R, A FF OL o44. CITY K HALL PF 77-2 A SKDA4E NO R-1 S _J<OVDALE TP NEUMANN 0 • EXISTING ZONING I EXISTING ZONING, LOCATION MAP q R-4 PD75-3 Z PROPOSED ZONING ��.'� �( �' sin II i w PO I In Y 4J ¢ .� _ OUTLOT A Ac. w I3.1 .I h Ir I �pC''.GC I,III, �I'lll�iI 1 ;' �• 'Ilhllll �l� !0{5m tiO I ---�}•---n" DESCRIPTION � EXISTING ZONING °J 01 "C' / R-4 I / / LOT t F PROPOSED ZONING / �.•„��..� j �O^I � � s PD y/ s / onr r-es.n I FF /EXISTING ZONING •r^'r'°^• ! rat. Wed / `lee EXISTING ZONING LEDmr A 0 PROPOSED ROYAL OAK CIRCLE L ()<b 19- r cp 2m, q 10 0 ic mossullsiono's • a V23? LIND AD - DITION James R. Hill, inc PLANNERS / ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS M.G. ASTLEFOAV PRELIMINARY PLAN & LANDSCAPING 11 LOCATION MAP w all y lh : A ! / r r��l�i� z z _ �A r III I��' / u_ Y`� /•"b DESCRIPTION _ 9 jr�ijl ; M f : l / / / V•W1�'A.:�1i 7� 1 ✓ /� �N' M 1 JA y 7 1 1• 1 1 1'�1 ]� 7: Ot OBY r, Q i I�Ir 1 E L� Y� SITE DATA G� Q: c97 `: IL .J 1 . cwc cwc .. t N I � L GEN^n � an+. —_— `I 1 A01 t. .0 NIRET LYE I ve. LYt.� d f 7 ---L Y eno I II I OUTLOT A m i.. LOTI ELK I O O M / F' E] I DESCRIPTION aYN �Y•O'M' WR LOCATION MAP "mm�z 4%"' UTILITIES LEGEND nv.•.Yn.., um ..ewu• i w 1..�.... Y•rou• ••ru ••. .ti ..N Y•R• .Y•O SITE DATA m r 77: C7: N I 11111114.4-11A.1 ILI III 1111111 Hit 0 If I I I I T Tf i T T fTI-T-rf I. I TT*Tt:T i I f Tf MITI M Tf F-11 i milt MONTH! Alt RE I I IT -n. all I .!..I j i I U H rff�� 7-j \ 4, 4AIIII I.; q 1-.31N C(111111 iTT 1 T A TIT MUTT Tit 4 Im �jj "J." 1, RT16- , IT TTTT-' frITT111MIT IL I 11111114.4-11A.1 ILI III 1111111 Hit 0 If I I I I T Tf i T T fTI-T-rf I. I TT*Tt:T i I f Tf MITI M Tf F-11 i milt MONTH! Alt RE I I IT -n. all I .!..I j i I U H rff�� 7-j \ 4, 4AIIII I.; q 1-.31N C(111111 iTT 1 T A TIT MUTT Tit 4 Im �jj "J." E 01 8)3.0 oeo5` 1 815.9 \\COY 0_0 - -10 7900" =]� _i:Fe.{-, - DP -4 1 N 802.0 - .':1�. ._-�BPq 96 874 a L5.- P-T-CP=2 =- - 30 C -n Bl�• .-B79.B._, IE 5.0 821.5 69.4. I ./ 829.) 'S' 24- _.-":-•. `rEnTw:v� - Q DP -20 I /'.. - 0 �_iGMS a00. - 901 0 "I DP -23 ._�-9042 _ g'+ 879.6 .� 823-0 •e \.: 1. _ 2 d96 �n•. r•.ar naaK B29J D cIF V}� 1 790.7 _ DP -22 ..-� 806.0 "'-JP-66� 8900 1 \ \'o. .-./ _ - 8710 `3922 Z . ` CP -11 G2. JP 3 - 1'_ ej1fi7 dR-❑ JP•65 7950-I JP -2 12 Bait -o 880.0 869.0 8887 .. 1. ....'.. ,� 808./ 844 0 .: ... 17.6 .9013 1651.5 O �1 t. J-,-JP-47 J-0 SO& ` 800.0 .-_..��.� cr 8"o 8492 802,5 -- 1 04. _ =e J'e _ 12. 24- BP -I ` 846.5 .' 7903 - -- _- 8300- 80/0 JP -5 8238 ,J-°- 8340 _ 792 3 801.6 JP -10 8208 P-29 8300 809 ] B/8.0 ' 8-0 BP -28 .88 B9 300 .- BP -33 �e d6B0 ` - JP -49 e >'� 8860 48' 8 "3w C<:E - 8300 P-7' a -r 895.2 =�-''� - -_ 8706 JP -35 JP- 7 8300 .. = EP -3 99 s. }2�a, 872.4 9652 - -„ 903.2 jVU�, 12 «4 0 ]I 9202 5J �P-37JB,ap 3• B -9 i ___ __ _ 872.0SP-4 - Z / BP 4 (875.0 874 5 92.BJOO -a ' 0 8742 927 0 9212 886.5 882. LP -63 _ 8860 a550 V .o _ �•2J.._-_12' .90p 8 Y 918.0 BP -S --r i9ID _ 923.2 996.5 i':--- LP -4o4 91828 -- - � O.:�B:-0 1a:.. BP -17I .._G;ti: 853.2.:_ L85i.1 910.1 BP -23 I _ � > ' "• i J882o I i _ NLP 42 •^- 1- ;,-. SP -9 .n 9j2j ,BP -IB -. W �il 1 Oh 911.3 R 8920: L -a _ '•'_]Ear �:; _ i �.R(9.6•. a< BP_6 s'B_E:clrrs .-.:.- ._�; city of eagan approved:rF #�STORM S WER.PUBLIC woRKsMASTER PLAN . 1 DEPARTMEN .rn•.EE b 1--� DOODLE I .. -. - 5 ti 1 - 43� 502 wef 04 Eo• zv - _ ..:n I10•-' - wel ro �.-_— 16 39- PNMOPHOUSEE 296 1 W �5 434/ o (503 �� yr•.—•,�� ° 435—/__-.-. ( g� r 53 j -- 1 ] 507 506 FUTME °.1LN I.E.1q MT .� 436 .1" FACILITY 43 ds� 509- e- . e °� 39 509 96 /° o ix E 3 / 406 ' 397 4FIGURE 2 -�zORKS 0 zGMAGE ; 103 4FIGURE 2 Agenda Information April 2, 1985 City Page Twenty -Three Memo Council Meeting FINAL RESOLUTION/LEMAY LAKE PROJECT C. Final Resolution for LeMay Lake Apartments Project Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds in the Amount of $12,500,000 -- The Healey- Ramme Company has made application through the City's program administrator, Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc., to have consideration to the final resolution for the LeMay Lake Project multifamily housing revenue bonds in the amount of $12,500,000. All the documentation is in order for consideration. If the City Council desires any additional information on this project, please feel free to contact this office at any time. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the final resolution for the LeMay Lake Apartments Project multifamily housing revenue bonds in the amount of $12,500,000. KEYLAND HOMES FOR A VARIANCE D. Keyland Homes for a One -Foot Variance from the Ten -Foot, Sideyard Setback Requirement for Lot 2, Block 2, Sun Cliff 2nd Addition --An application was received from Keyland Homes requesting a variance of 1 -foot for a sideyard setback .on a home that is under construction at 1898 Bear Path Trail. Enclosed on pages through is a brief review by the Planning Department an a map locatin subject lot and defining the variance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1 -foot variance to Keyland Homes. /_ 7 To approve or deny the CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: KEYLAND HOMES LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 2, SUNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: P.D. - .EAGAN HILLS WEST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 2, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 22, 1985 REPORTED BY: GREG H INGRAHAM, ASST. PLANNER REVIEWED BY: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER PROPOSAL SUMMARY: Due to an alteration during construction of a house that is located at 1898 Bear Path Trail, the house ended up 9" within the 10' sideyard setback area. The home builder wishes to clear up this mistake by obtaining a 1' variance from the City. The onlyalternative to the variance would be the acquisition of a 1' strip of land from the adjacent lot. If approved, the variance shall be subject to all applicable City ordinances and requirements. ■ Z FOR: C. R. WINDEN S ASSOCIATES; INC. LAND SURVEYORS Tel 645-3646 1381 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. 55106 KEY -LAND HOMES �. Q Scale: 1" = 30' s Denotes Iron Monument J 22 N i / ni e - °m e %g98 _M Q, V 2 9err d / 42 r Ino !' S1otv,,�v s�ercLc, "V SS 0 h. 30.86 589`30'31"yy Lot 2, Block 2, SUN CLIFF SECOND ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON, AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. Dated this 60% day of A.D. I98r C. R. WIINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. House LOcniC._ rl-'.QrGF I, ISS_ by Surveyor, Minnesota Registration No. 7726 I�-z2 � /07 Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four PARKCLIFF DEVELOPMENT - FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE E. Parkcliff Development for a Ten -Foot Variance from the Thirty - Foot Frontyard Setback Requirement for Lots 1, 2, 3 & 4, Block 1, Parkcliff 3rd Addition --An application was received from Parkcliff Development Inc., requesting a 10 -foot variance from the 30 -foot front setback requirement for Lots 1 through 4, Block 1, of Parkcliff 3rd Addition. The reason for the variance request is to allow more flexibility in dealing with the steep slope and existing trees in the rear yards of these lots. For additional information on this item, refer to pagesthrough 73 that includes a copy of the City Planner's brief report is and a location map indicating the subject parcels and variance request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the 10 -foot frontyard setback variance requested by Parkcliff Devel- opment Inc. 7U • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: PARKCLI.FF DEVELOPMENT, INC. LOCATION: LOTS 1, 2, 3 & 4, BLOCK 1, PARKCLIFF 3RD ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: APRIL 2, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: .MARCH 22, 1985 REPORTED'BY: GREG H INGRAHAM, ASST. PLANNER REVIEWED BY: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is asking for a 10' variance from the 30' front setback requirement for Lots 1 - 4, block 1, of Parkcliff 3rd Addition. The reason for the variance request is to allow more flexibility iq dealing with the steep slope and existing trees in the rear yards of these lots. If approved, the variance shall City ordinances and requirements. %/ be subject to all applicable PARK CLIFF 3RD ADDITION ADDRESSES .. ZO - FOITYAW 5E TBV -K ,e f gUESTEI7, L rs 1-4 !11\ In R P1 uP.Y.I .Pw yylSf OIN...11 µo\. nu1�uHP i� ui v♦II\\~OV N..`�N\VA. ..DIY 1NMfO P�i�naP \C\�VY�1 �N P V{ 1.11\ -•-...ypn\i.1P PMRN010 CVp. te�1. VILIHn1 Mx/ i e omctSIx0 COY/AMY, Ixt. r ,SHEET 2 O/ 2 SHEETS • PARKCLIFF 3 RD ADDITION ...IYllnr IMIY1111 \w � )MPRN4r INC. .00 un ,... unn om.u. vmt.e.. nnr w EROSION CONTROL PLAN PARKCLIFF 3 RD ADDITION .ull.......,...1 .. �. wmuru uv.o mw e. nuw ow y 1M PARKCLIFF Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five WAIVER OF PLAT/ART PERRI F. Art Perri for Waiver of Plat for Lot 1, Block 2, Oak Chase 1st Addition --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on March 28, 1985, to consider a waiver of plat application submitted by Art Perri to split the 1.6 acre parcel into two lots. The APC is recommend- ing approval of the item to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to the City Planner's report a copy is enclosed on pages_ Z�� through7 For action � that was taken by the Advi ory Planning Commission, refer to a copy of those minutes which will appear as a part of the Admin- istrative packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for Art Perri, Lot 1, Block 2, Oak Chase 1st Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: ART PERRI LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 2 OAK CHASE 1st ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: E — ESTATE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 28, 1985 " DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 21, 1985 REPORTED BY:' GREG H. INGRAHAM, ASSISTANT PLANNER REVIEWED BY: DALE C. RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER • PROPOSAL SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting a waiver of the platting require— ments in order to split the 1.6 acre parcel into 2 lots. The existing house is located on proposed parcel "A" which would be approximaely 40,000 square feet in area. Parcel "B" would be approximately 30,000 square feet. City Code requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet in this zone. The original large size of Lot 1, Block 2 was due to a low area north of the current home location. This lot division should split that low area between the two parcels. If approved the Waiver of Plat shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. All City ordinances and requirements shall be adhered to. ---------------- 7- K n!j, OAK CHASE�F � PARK 3,PKE 72 1A ISV- -7 1 A P\ A JA PF �9th' ! s >>., PF I I A I R PF Lj- - - PARKVIEW GOLF COURSE DA KO TA COUN i Y A PARK EXCEPTil"N R-1 PK (f -J07 INCL'JCCEU C:;o A i A PARK) PF cc R-1 LJ LLi I DLACE PD 75-1 ---------------- 7- K n!j, OAK CHASE�F � PARK 3,PKE 72 1A ISV- -7 1 A P\ A JA PF �9th' ! s >>., PF I I A I R PF Lj- - - PARKVIEW GOLF COURSE DA KO TA COUN i Y A PARK EXCEPTil"N R-1 PK (f -J07 INCL'JCCEU C:;o A i A PARK) 'TRI -LAND INC. Certificate of Survey for SURVEYING SERVICES ART PERRL Eagan, Minnesota 55121 N 1"=50' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ✓ARCEL ; „ii Dat cart of Lot 1, Biock 2, Gek C,iase First Addition, Lying 5outheriy or she ;`otiowiino dine: Said iine b,2oins at a ^oint on the West iine e5 said Lot 1 distant 222.ir. reec North of the sotheasc corner rr;' said Lot 1; thence Scut" 73 decree 29 mutes i+ seconds East 212.50 feet ,to .he West line or said Lotij and there terminating. PARCH "B° Nil that part of Lot 1, Bicck 2, Oak Chase Firsc Additipn, Lying Northeriy of':he foiiowing described line: Said line bogins at a point onl the West line or. said Lot 1 distant 222.16 feet North of the southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence South 73 degrees 29 Minutes 1f. seconds East 212.50 feat to the west line of said Lot 1 and there terminating 4 Y a 0 De ` 119 84 Cly 31° 39' 3q„ �F iygl✓ �� SS e°9y, Syo F 0 0 _ v' O,To oc, N N 0.90 ac. N89° 35'37E 180.00 f?, 0 0 0 N1 7 A. O 0 0 Q ie I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a�� Bradley wenson Mn. Reg No. 15235 duly. Registered Land Surveyor under the pate' 3/3, Laws of the State of Minnesota. Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six REVISE PRELIMINARY PLAT/FOREST RIDGE G. Forest Ridge for Revised Preliminary Plat, Dan Gustafson, Consisting of Approximately 20.02 Acres and Containing 17 Lots from Multiple Development --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on March 26, 1985, to consider a revised preliminary plat entitled Forest Ridge consisting of approximately 20.02 Acres and containing 17 lots for multiple development. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the revised preliminary plat as presented. For additional information on this item, refer to a report that was prepared by the Engineering and Planning Depart- ments entitled Forest Ridge Revised Preliminary Plat. This • report is enclosed on pages through �_ For additional information regarding the action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, a copy of those minutes will be supplied with the Administrative Agenda on Monday, April 1. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the revised preliminary plat for the Forest Ridge project. F1 -70 Is CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: FOREST RIDGE REVISED, PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: FOREST RIDGE PARTNERSHIP, DAN GUSTAFSON LOCATION: PART OF THE SE'g OF THE NW'y, SECTION 15 EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 26, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: MARCH 18,'1985 REPORTED BY: ENGINEERING & PLANNING DEPARTMENTS • APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a revision to the Forest Ridge Preliminary Plat consisting of approx. 20.02 acres and containing 17 lots for multiple development. COMMENTS: As you may recall, the original PP consisted of 2 types of multiple units. The larger were 54 unit buildings which had garages attached to each end. 'These buildings are similar to buildings which have been constructed in Surrey Gardens on Yankee Doodle Rd. The second type of unit proposed, were more of a townhouse or split entry, multiple unit with the garage being on the middle floor of the unit. Since the approval of the original plat, there were many trade offs and changes from the original design which were made by the Commission and Council. Since this final approval the applicants have been studying the site and trying to work the most feasible way to develop the site. Noting that a substantial amount of grading would have to be completed for the 54 units buildings, the applicants have decided to change their design to have more of the townhouse type of apartment with underground parking and • 3 stories above, such as the units that were approved for Blackhawk Townhouse Apartments. Therefore, the applicant is able to fit the unit into the topography versus what was originally proposed for the development plan. The issues which would most affect the residents to the east is to how this revised development would- impact this adjacent neighborhood. The first 2 buildings have as greater setback than what was originally proposed. Also, the access and circulation would be further from the property to the east. It appears the scale of buildings is reduced by creating a number of smaller buildings rather than the larger row buildings which were originally proposed. Hopefully, the designs being proposed have all been positive in aesthetics and site planning in order to create a better relationship than what was origin— ally approved. The access to this development would now be served by one private drive from Duckwood, looping out to Denmark Av and private drives circulating from the interior street as well as from Denmark Av. There are only two curb cuts on Denmark to provide circulation to this development. However, there are opportunities where additional connections could be made if required by the City for better circulation. 77 PRELIMINARY PLAT, FOREST RIDGE MARCH 26, 1985 PAGE 2 The applicant is still keeping 252 units, which were the number approved in the original plan, however, design is the major reason for this revised plat. This design will hopefully better this development and also reduce the lot coverage. All along the east property, it appears that this design provides either greater setbacks or preserves the natural topography: The mass of the structure, has been reduced blending the smaller units more effectively with the property to the east. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The existing topography for this development consists largely of rolling grassland with hills and depressions. As can be seen from Figure 1, this development is located within two maior drainage districts. Approximately the southern one-fourth of this development is located within Major Drainage District J. This maior drainage district has gravity flow to the Minnesota River. The remaining three-fourths of this development is located within Maior Drainage District D. Run-off within this area is collected into a depression shown as Pond DP -22 on Figure 1. Although no positive outlet for this pond is in place, Protect 429 (Town Centre 70 & 100 - streets and utilities) will be providing the necessary outlet to this pond along with a required storm sewer to make the connection to Pond DP -4. Under the previous proposal in August of 1984, this development would have been responsible for the acquisition of a portion of the ponding easement necessary for Pond DP -4 that is located on the Robert O'Neil property. However, this revised layout allows Pond DP -22 to increase its storage volume to _limit the outflow from this pond to 2 CFS. Subsequently, storm water from this development will not impact the storage area required for easement for Pond DP -4. This proposed development will require the City to install a control outlet from Pond DP -22 and also to extend an existing storm sewer from the Duckwood Estates development to the normal water level for Pond DP -22. Costs for these improvements will be the responsibility of the City's trunk storm sewer fund. SANITARY SEWER: This development will require extension of a 12" trunk sanitary sewer line from the intersection of Duckwood Drive and Denmark Avenue as illustrated in Figure 2. This extension is being covered under Project 429. This trunk storm sewer will also accomodate the Town Centre 70 and a portion of the Town Centre 100 developments. This development will be responsible for constructing all lateral sanitary sewers to provide service within this development. An 8" sanitary sewer is in place within Duckwood Drive at a depth and capacity to service this proposed development. WATERMAIN: A 24" watermain is located within Duckwood Drive and a 12" watermain is located within Denmark Avenue. Both lines terminate at the Denmark/Duckwood intersection. These mains are of sufficient capacity to provide the necessary water service to this development. As you can see from Figure 3, no trunk watermain extensions will be required by this development. PRELIMINARY PLAT, FOREST RIDGE MARCH 26, 1985 PAGE 3 STREETS: The existing street bordering this development on its southerly boundary is Duckwood Drive. Duckwood Drive is designated as a City collector street and is built to its ultimate design section, that being a 44 -ft. wide, 9 -ton bituminous paved roadway with concrete curb and gutter. This development will require the extension of Denmark Avenue north of Duckwood Drive. This will be accomplished under Proiect 429. Because Denmark Avenue is classified as a City community collector street, it will require that a 6 -ft. concrete sidewalk be constructed along the east side of Denmark Avenue. This sidewalk will be the responsibility of this development. Staff has no objection with the proposed accesses along Denmark Avenue. Staff feels that any proposed accesses for the Town Centre 70 pro+ect can • be relocated to line up with these accesses because the Town Centre 70 accesses are basically for employee parking and deliveries. Subsequently, the shift of these entrances to line up with the Forest Ridge entrances should not cause any significant problems. The proposed access onto Duckwood Drive from this development is approximately 360 ft.. east of the center line of Denmark Avenue, while Crossroad Court is located approximately 400 ft. east of the center line of Denmark Avenue. This results in a 40-f t. off -set between the proposed private street and Crossroad Court, a publicly dedicated street. According to the City Code, public streets shall not have less than 125 -ft. offsets, and private street intersections with publicly dedicated streets shall have a minimum 180-f r. offset. However, there is no classification for intersections where private drives and public streets meet, as is the case with this proposed development. But, in either case, the 40 -ft. offset is definitely less than either of the offsets allowed by code. Therefore, staff recommends the proposed • private drive at Duckwood Drive be shifted easterly to align with the Crossroad Court intersection. Staff feels this is feasible and can be accomplished with a minimum of inconvenience to the developer. The internal private streets shall be constructed in accordance with City Code. Staff recommends that minimum separation between units, based on code, be 74 feet. This results from a 25 -ft. setback for each row of units plus a 24 -ft. driving lane. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: As a condition of final platting, this development shall dedicate a 40 -ft. half right-of-way for Duckwood Drive and a 40 -ft. half right-of-way for Denmark Drive. Easements shall be dedicated as required by City Code. Utility easements of sufficient widths will be required to be dedicated over any public utilities constructed within this development. A ponding and drainage easement will be required to be dedicated encompassing the high water elevation for Pond DP -22. a PRELIMINARY PLAT, FOREST RIDGE MARCH 26, 1985 PAGE 4 ASSESSMENTS: The special assessments this development is responsible for were highlighted in the August, 1984, Engineering Report. Therefore, only the Assessment Summary Table is included with this report. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 1985 RATE AMOUNT Trunk Area Storm Sewer 696,960 SF(1) $0.061/SF $42,515 Upgrading Street Assessment 620 FF 28.47/FF(2) 17,651 (Residential to Multiple) - TOTAL ..................... $60,166 • (1)Includes 20% public R/W and ponding easement credit. (2)Multiple ($60.92) - Residential ($32.45) CONDITIONS: If approved, this platshould be subject to the same conditions that were imposed on the original development. . 1. Proiect 429 (Town Centre 70 & 100 - street & utility improvements) shall be authorized for construction prior to final plat approval. The private • street entrance on Duckwood Drive shall be shifted easterly to line up with Crossroad Court. 2. A minimum separation between townhomes located opposite each other along private drives shall be 74 feet. 3. A 40 -ft. half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Duckwood Drive and Denmark Avenue. 4. A ponding easement encompassing the high water elevation for Pond DP -22 shall be dedicated on the final plat. 5. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessment and the upgrading of the street assessment for .Duckwood Drive at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 6. This development shall be responsible for its share of the cost for the improvement of Denmark Avenue with streets and utilities and all costs for the internal public utilities. G3, A A -T- PD 83-0 A. S C -7 82-2 GARD'P��S' GB_ ffRB CSC C p HTS -2 A- 82 !-R ice, 75-2f( CS1 pi EN .. R 2- ........ R R A ��; -.Z, Sl I A A N R -- A IL - A R 14Tr IF t -A IF. `ITY �iALL . cr, K, 4 (V&_ PD Ivy$ `i Y. PF 77-2 q A �S:KQVDALE PK 6-1 p R I jKOVC-ALt ci PF', -I BERRY FATCH- co -:EU,'AANN PARK g. I / I 'ES'.?.TES � Ic ♦ / R / I .. I I I a FY.C..:US ui �I OG3 4 ...... 8.... 7 ` .no ..ao m.•.. 8 e I - - 2 13 12 ..:..r 17 I i� .. I I I / O I 10 O 15 14 ..r.. � / 9 3 ... U I it I I + + + DENMARK AVENUE + ` ------ --- -----I I- LAND USE SUMMARY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION I I I L1 - uiul.. mxn •-. r.. aLr o..... \r .1 r.• mm....I own. o. r.. .°rano E•••. •" °Y.nur.r.n, ruou man r, nx.um. I PARKING I rumr q v.n• M• sumo. m hr I hl .er.r.rne I.en...l )RE FOREST RIDGE OF EAGAN ""°""'°'°" ^ �• •'�.�-��' FOREST RIDGE �- GINEERIN6 - '•' •••• ^^ .OMPRNY INC. PRELIMINARY PLAT :r PARTNERSHIP 1. IIUO..unln4l. ru.IM1. U4r .w .0-.°00 w••4Yx• �� • x.ne.. .mu. FOREST RIDGE I�ytuX Wcav &sspres —l --*,p lot -Li 07 I �IIir�1 � � IIII:.I.Z ��:.. II.54 I... � UNIT uN r NI U - I axir G G 1. -- --- ---- -- a Z o IOD' ub f' ruf®.�4, I MT- =-. -17`1 m-= - - =m - - ra -��n--1-7-= _ MI F�1 -_ - if- f=�nlrj lm - . - m = II 1 M N'•Yw' I'uU1-:IIS wer � I � Ii w4 w." Wq wI.J i I w•, J•W' . J -A is M RW KI iowA � j 14 Glq wvwvw —' 1 67 N -B I ;j —,`:; v 1 2 RE55--' / il[slHGTOY 'Sp!�— O 15 681, Uri, 9 FO. I 1i N -E w,oGEl I N- V I N- U J _l 12u 0... I _ C -H2 31 — - 3 '6 MI5 C-00 " n C -NN HiE q - o r-- I n I snuvoaLE �r,. 61 �I 33 HJ ] C -i .rr ✓ C - P P t FOREST RIDGE SUBJECT PARCEL • FIG. *2 pity of eagan SANITARY SEWER approved= p PUBLIC late #d - WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT / V u /7Bo(`9� 36 35 34 -°- 12•''/26..,-..,,16" 23 122 ... 239 12•.u„ ,.347/540,:,�J / ,� @30 1 16" I] 12 5'_�CUI ::._� I�nCoR� ... 121: \1 INLNG:�ic d:-c� 492/)40 _- 12• 120. .�.. h: ! P1LQB 1B• `•% l\ l' �_� #0 - A' V71 2- 720/72 is 0.r 5.7/52.0 12,'•. _ 52 0s0 .IQI,v'.:^� 16" 590 45 ® 4]T/94p /640, 5J2 _ \CL`:'AV:3�. I _ _. _ 51.2 ELEVATED Si0R40E '`` ` KE ' 0 S F -,^,5'y. 50 1 ,39.5/1170 640/610 N.W.L. 1059 _-'^��-�� SERVICE 51 :vp'ny�pa'. 1'458,680 12• "&04 T2 I_•uNGiC,45�� •43/750 i_ 9• ]7 69.]/Bap 551/720.2• _ 20'612/90579/730 1419/60000" fi® 00 „ I )e TREATM NT1 68/640 PLANT SITE. - 02Y00,)1 -•cBal - '�J -_'•VR 636/721 01 _ 6” /92.0 la ;+,;15fi 2/67Oai, _•:p —__ :CIY.LN 1 55.3/700 603/751L'T X. •= 1:' ' .x 1 -_681/63,0 102 103 aw A- -30" 444.4�44�4�4�4�4� 30" ._YiG`1 •.ta •• ].Oe•y" IID 453/600 1 _ 84,7/98 _ _ 0 0 04 8Y.!'m 1• 13 5].0/690 /_ ... _ ._ 591/750 107, ' ::K` � 9• 51 i I - 6 }1..'\� 118• ,JI 112" ` ` I _��— 12 WJ 1 1LILLS 122 —1 16" ^SIr1' - I /960 111 503/670 BLAC _�.• �4111, 12 - dL4[NN4NR I �: f!!! 1 �' 105 532/fi6_p�= _-6SL81,0 �' 1 112 50.4/670 1 12' •ice FIG. #3 city of eagan WATER approved:. plate #tl— PUBLICBLIC � . _ WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT F - -0-g.. y" -y D -a � ... i4 D -c ^ 24' .DrP-_Y,.;P_ni -- 880.0 OP -2 4,0 ..678.0 } 827.6. L.S.-4 Ba2.6. 84 3 t_- 841 841 9 CP -5 - 850.5 873.0 '-�recm 875. •n r�� iPaHKI : -11T1 +DGE - 'CP:2--: _��_--- -30 - C -K-- 874. 878. 523 .5 J29,7 r9• 240.4 -i1. - c .. •:V'.� - ryrs 826.5 625.0 829.6 829.7 _ / 87 - BBI CP -II I a 844.0 795.0 JP-2� rZ 6472 608.1 _ _ _ ._ _�;. 8 44 0 .\ 85/.5 - \ JP -4 24- " 844 0 ..\i 6]90.7 ti -846.5 8010 7.1. JP -5 - - 8238 CK�ANN I 27'-- -LL GHN BP -2 I 7 e Y.CliOI i -- I -BP-29 8097 8J6.0 1 !I jp 8 B9 BP -2B 8-4 8626 8300 B6B.0 a,NCALE 48' a JP -36 -, 870.6 10_44. DP-15 - 876.0 8782 ryIY Lp1AY�° I -- i °- DP -19 n _2,1ipp_3 60.0 671.7 J -67/.7 � � -.rJ.IG -SOP-13 D 882.0--,b - \ DP -2T_._-_ BB.43 8746 OP -6 878.0 857.3 ((((((��-O OP -1 I _ 8665 8560 869.9 ~�t6• 8383 DP -4 85855.4 n. / 874,8 L.B.-7 F--�71I2 Da-lo ////��1 • `V 8480 DF 1001 0 0-r _ .8600- G. 4J 9012 B6 OP-23-I_90a2 0• /-- 6930 DP -7 2 897.6 lam• I 7A2• Y__.,g°0620 DP -, 6645 -f.•.k ' 892.0 _ ,g1P'g13- - _r -` 812.6 , 90/85 J J2. 99)6 JP -47 , 9955 y JP -46 8492 - J-0 _ - 892.3 ,8513 16- - _ 891.5 s L's'I JP -63 c_ - 7.2 899.7 JF JP -Il 9007 1-,. 81 615.7 -JP-4q .+�r' 8300 I' 690.T -- 895J •._:'.141 .f_.,II��_ Jv': _� ��--- JP -10- _ 8208. 830.0 F JP -49 8300 pp l7. - 830.0 ITCH F-. I____�1 a\ 2Y ///CCChhhiiilll 859 4 ................ ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL FOREST RIDGE FIG. # 1 city of eagan - a standard PUBLIC STORM SEWER approved: plate #: WORKS DEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN Agenda Information April 2, 1985 City Page Twenty -Seven Memo Council Meeting CONTRACT 85-1/AWARD CONTRACT/S & W INDUSTRIAL ACRES A. Contract 85-1, Receive Bids/Award Contract (S & W Industrial Acres) --On Thursday, March 28, 1985, at 10:30 a.m., bids were opened at City Hall. The successful low bidder of six bidders was F.F. Jedlicki who submitted a base bid of $132,026.50. A list of all bidders along with their base bids is contained on page W - The low total base bid of $132,026.50 is 21% under the feasibility report and 5.7% under the engineers estimate. A minor change in the scope of this project resulted from narrowing of the street and the sale of excess material by the Contractor are the apparent reasons for the 21% discrepancy from the feasibility report. According to our consulting engineers, F.F. Jedlicki is a responsible contractor and therefore should be considered' for the bid award for Contract 85-1. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Award City Contract 85-1, Project 430 (S & W Industrial Acres - streets and utilities) to F.F. Jedlicki Construction Company in the amount of $132,026.50 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the required contract documents. 1�13 Our File No. 49324 S & W INDUSTRIAL ACRES UTILITY S STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY CONTRACT NO. 85-1 - PROJECT 430 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.S.T. BID DATE: Thursdav, March 28, 1985 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ----- Feasibility Report, Project 430 Low Bid, Contract 85-1 % Over (+)/Under (-) Feasibility Report % Over (+)/Under (-) Engineer's Estimate $140,000.00 167,035.00 132,026.50 -21% -5.7% CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. F.F. Jedlicki 132,026.50 2. S.M. Hentges & Son 132,457.96 3. Orfei & Sons, Inc. 148,122.81 4. Alexander Construction 161,833.95 - 5. Northdale Construction 163,205.00 6. 0 & P Contracting 175,581.00 7• McNamara Vivant Contracting No Bid 8. Ro-So Contracting No Bid 9. Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. No Bid 10. Lake Area Utility No Bid 11. Spencer Construction No Bid 12. M. Danner Trucking Nn Rid ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ----- Feasibility Report, Project 430 Low Bid, Contract 85-1 % Over (+)/Under (-) Feasibility Report % Over (+)/Under (-) Engineer's Estimate $140,000.00 167,035.00 132,026.50 -21% -5.7% Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight CONTRACT 85-2/AWARD CONTRACT/PEACEFUL HEIGHTS B. Contract 85-2, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Peaceful Heights) -- Sealed bids were opened at 10:30 a.m, on Friday, March'29, 1985, for the street and utility improvements for the Peaceful Heights Addition under Contract 85-2, Project 420. The low bid of 12 bidders was ACG, Inc. Their low bid was $83,083.35. As can be seen on page the bid is 27% under the feasibility report and 10.7x Under the engineer's estimate. To staff's knowledge, this contractor has not worked within or for Eagan in the past. Our consulting engineering firm will be checking for some references regarding their work. This contractor did supply a bid bond which indicates that ACG, Inc., is a responsi- ble bidder. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To award City Contract 85-2 (Peaceful Heights - Utility and Street Improvements) to the lowest responsible bidder, ACG, Inc., in the amount of $83,083.35 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents. Our File No. 49326 PEACEFUL HEIGHTS UTILITIES 6 STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY CONTRACT #85-2 - PROJECT 0420 EAGAN, MINNESOTA CONTRACTORS BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.S.T. BID DATE: Fridav, March 29, 1985 TOTAL BASE BID 83,083.35 86,360.90 86,929.20 87,355.87 87,771.00 89,056.35 90,918.13 93,788.35 94,697.75 96,122.75 96.853.30 04 977In No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ 93,000.00 Feasibility Report 107,870.00 Low Bid 83,083.35 %'of Low Bid, Feasibility Report -237 % of Low Bid, Engineer's Estimate -10.7% / 6 1. ACG, Inc. 2. Lake Area Utility •' 3. Spencer Contracting 4. S.M. Hentges & Son 5. Burschville Construction 6. F.F. Jedlicki Inc. 7. Orfei & Sons, Inc. d. 0 & P Contracting 9. Gartzke Construction 10. M. Danner Trucking 11. Northdale Construction 12. Rice Lake Contracting 13. H.B.H. Construction 14. Lund Asphalt Construction 15. McNamara Contracting Co. 16. Ro-So Contracting 17. S.J. Louis Construction 18. Alexander Construction BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.S.T. BID DATE: Fridav, March 29, 1985 TOTAL BASE BID 83,083.35 86,360.90 86,929.20 87,355.87 87,771.00 89,056.35 90,918.13 93,788.35 94,697.75 96,122.75 96.853.30 04 977In No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ 93,000.00 Feasibility Report 107,870.00 Low Bid 83,083.35 %'of Low Bid, Feasibility Report -237 % of Low Bid, Engineer's Estimate -10.7% / 6 Agenda Information Memo April 2, 1985 City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine UULV1'KAI.T 67-//HUVGK 7"1 JbL9 hlV"1" run D1UJ LEMAY LAKE 1ST ADDITION — STREETS & UTILITIES C. Contract 85-7, Approve Plans and Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (LeMay Lake 1st Addition) --Earlier on the agenda, the public hearing was held to discuss the installation of streets and utilities to service the LeMay Lake 1st Addition under Project 424. If that public hearing is closed and the project ordered in, it would be in order for the Council to consider approval of the detailed plans and specifications and authorize the advertisement for bid opening. These plans and specifications have been simultaneously prepared by the consulting engineeringfirm at the petitioned request of the developer • with all costs guaranteed by the developer should the project not be approved at the time of public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve the detailed plans and specifications for Contract 85-7 providing for the installation of streets and utilities to service the LeMay Lake 1st Addition and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, April 30, 1985. s/Thomas L. Hedges City.Administrator MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY AMDINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 29, 1985 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE CITY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE MEETING Enclosed is a copy of a memorandum and agenda for the upcoming City Celebration Committee scheduled for April 1. Also attached are copies of minutes and a press release regarding that Committee. This information is enclosed and.referenced on pages /0 O through 4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION CONTRIBUTION & CITY CELEBRATION BUDGET • At a recent City Council meeting, a question was asked about the budgeting of fireworks for the Eagan 4th of July celebration. The fireworks allocation was budgeted in the amount of $1,000 in Parks and Recreation under Other Contractural Services, Account No.. 4430. Also in discussing the $5,000 budget that was recently approved for the City Celebration Committee, it is the opinion of the Director of Finance that $5,000 will be transfered out of the Contingency Department to Administration which means that the contingency would be reduced to $217,720 and Adminis- tration would be increased to $198,280. The Director of Finance will transfer the entire $5,000 as an appropriation to Line Item No. 4220 which is Operating Supplies. He has set up a new program in Administration for the cost. CEDAR CLIFF BANK FACILITY/PYLON SIGN Earlier this winter, the City Council approved a pylon sign for the Cedar Cliff bank facility. There was a question raised by the City Council and approval was subject to an opinion from the City Attorney's office affirming that the sign ordinance does not prevent the erection of such a sign. The City Attorney's office did research the pylon sign and a copy of those findings are enclosed on pages /06 through /07 for your review. I apologize for submitting this memorandum late to the City Council, however, when it was received in late February, it was placed in the April 2 file as opposed to the March 5 City Council file. MEMO TO ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION At the last regular City Council meeting, a draft copy of a memorandum to the Advisory Planning Commission was reviewed. The memorandum was finalized and submitted to the Advisory Planning Commissio_9 this week for their review. A copy is enclosed on pages through for the City Council. MASAC UPDATE Enclosed on pages //D through �� % is a copy of an agenda and minutes that were distributed or t e recent MASAC meeting. q5�1 MEMO TO HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS MARCH 29, 1985 PAGE 2 Mr. Tom Baker, the City's representative on MASAC, and John Hohenstein attended the meeting, and the 180 degree turn or what is referenced as the Burnsville turn did not receive any formal action by the Committee that evening. It was continued until the April 23 meeting for further consideration. Mayor Blomquist and the City Administrator had an opportunity to meet with Jeff Hamiel, Aiport Director, and Darrell Weslander, noise abatement officer for the Metropolitan Airports Commission, on Wednesday, March 27. Mayor Blomquist and the City Administrator were briefed on a number of operations that relate to air traffic noise and also given a rather extensive tour of the airport grounds, witnessing takeoffs, landings, the ground run-up area and actually experiencing time in the control tower discussing takeoff and landing maneuvers with the FAA. The meeting was originally planned as a luncheon beginning at 12:30, however, due to the • interest expressed by all four parties, Mayor Blomquist and the City Administrator did not leave the airport until about 5:20 p.m. The City Administrator has recorded a number of notes and will be preparing a memoradum for review by both the Airports Noise Committee and City Council. Both the Mayor and City Adminis- trator felt the afternoon was a learning experience and would highly recommend members of the Airport Noise Committee and City Council to spend some time at the airport with those two individuals to receive a similar type tour. HRA STATUS REPORT Enclosed on pages lie through /I I is a copy of the February status reports for all the assisted housing programs in Dakota County and the community development programs administered by the Dakota County HRA. Enclosed is a brief description of assisted housing programs which is helpful in reviewing the statistical data. LAWRENCE POPPLER/LEMAY LAKE PROJECT Enclosed in your packet is a sealed envelope that was submitted to the City Administrator by Mr. Lawrence Poppler on behalf of his son, Larry Poppler. The Popplers were concerned about a survey that was recently taken by the owners of the LeMay Lake project which apparently consumed approximately 17# feet of the Poppler property. The City Administrator, acting as the Director of Public Works, did meet with the Popplers and discussed the matter with a representative of the LeMay Lake project. It is the full intention of the owners of the LeMay Lake project that the 17� feet will be deeded as an outlot or an easement to the Popplers and not considered as a part of the LeMay Lake project. The City Administrator has received word from the Popplers that they are satisfied with the results of the negotiations with the developers of the LeMay Lake project and, therefore, the matter is resolved. �i City Adminis r for (;r7 TLH/ii 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Moor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Cmivo Mem0pr5 THOMAS HEDGES CIN Aomnns"Tor MEMO TO: ALL MEMBERS, CITY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Gry Clerk FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DUFFY DATE: MARCH 26, 1985 SUBJECT: APRIL 1, 1985 COMMITTEE AGENDA Enclosed please find an agenda for the April 1, 1985 regular City Celebration Committee meeting. Also enclosed are a copy of the minutes from the March 13 meeting and a rough draft of a proposed news release to be distributed to local media. Please review both items before the meeting on Monday. As per direction of the committee, several people have been invited to attend the April 1 meeting. A representative of the Mendota Heights Lions Club was to be contacted to attend and give further direction on the turkey barbeque. Also, Dorothy Peterson of the City of Eagan Parks and Recreation Department has been invited to explain and help coordinate park activities and locations with the committee. A representative of the Police Auxiliary will also be in attendance for discussion regarding their proposed T-shirt, hat and balloon sales. If you are unable to attend, please contact me. Enclosures cc: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers City Administrator Hedges THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 1100 AGENDA CITY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE APRIL 1, 1985 4:30 P.M. EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes 3. Visitors to be Heard 4. SubCommittee Reports a. History Book b. Lone Oak Tree C. City Celebration 5. Fund Raising Suggestions 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment r 1 U • CITY OF EAGAN MINUTES OF THE CITY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE March 13, 1985 A regular meeting of the City of Eagan Celebration Committee was held on Monday, March 13, 1985, at 4:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were resident members Carol Bergh, Sandra Masin, John McElligott, Rod Smith, and Mary Voracek; Bob Treichel representing the Volunteer Fire Department; Larry Wenzel representing the Eagan Chamber of Commerce; Don Klober representing the 4th of July Association; Bruce Harries representing the Eagan Jaycees; Richard Bertz representing the Minnesota Valley Exchange Club; and Brad Benzick representing the Optimists Club. Also present were Mayor Bea Blomquist, City Councilmember Ted Wachter, Historian Consultant Lisa Fleming and Administrative Assistant Holly Duffy. Absent were Ken Ketcham representing the Eagan Lions Club and Reverend Loren Nelson representing the Ministerial Association. • Approval of Minutes Bertz moved and the motion was seconded to approve the minutes of the February 4, 1985 meeting as presented. All voted in favor. Election of Officers Larry Wenzel was nominated to be Chairperson of the City Celebration Committee, the nomination was seconded and he was elected unanimously. Sandra Masin was nominated to be Vice Chairperson of the City Celebration Committee, the nomination was seconded and she was elected unanimously. Subcommittee Reports Chairperson Wenzel called for subcommittee reports. •• History Book Subcommittee The History Book Subcommittee reported that the final draft manuscript of the history document was almost completed. Only minor additions are yet to be added. All City Councilmembers were given a copy of the final draft and have submitted suggestions on final revisions. The staff will work with West Publishing to develop a request for proposals (RFP) for the publication of the book. It is estimated that the book will be ready for distribution approximately two months after submission to a publisher. Lone Oak Tree Subcommittee The Lone Oak Tree Subcommittee reported that they have been working with a sculptor and discussing preliminary plans for the Lone Oak sculpture (carving). The sculptor will help to develop specifications and cost projections for the sculpture. He will also help to select the sculptor who will actually perform the project. The subcommittee projected the July 4 weekend as a kickoff date for the project and a wrap up/presentation in the fall. The subcommittee is recommending that the scupture be performed where residents of the community will be able to watch the actual process. The pulbic works department will be contacted to see if they can prepare the smaller pieces of the tree for burning (stamping). Possibilities of items which could be made from the pieces included key chains, coasters and refrigerator magnets. City Celebration Subcommittee The City Celebration Subcommittee recommended that the Saturday of the 4th of July weekend (July 6) be selected as a major celebration day. They suggested that the main event of the day be a turkey barbeque. The Mendota Heights Lions Club was contacted by subcommittee members and has agreed to act as consultants for the project. They have many years experience in putting on such a turkey barbeque. .It is estimated that approximately 90 turkeys would need to be purchased. The Lions will be able to recommend the amount of people needed to help with this project. The subcommittee is looking into tents for seating. The subcommittee also suggested that a second fireworks display be presented the night of July 6. The carnival would be expected to contribute some funding for this and also the City Council would be approached for a donation. Another suggestion was a very large cake to be served to those at the barbeque. The subcommittee checked into prices and a 2,000 piece iced sheet cake would cost approximately $380 to $400. A suggestion was made that a mock cake decorated with some sort of theme presentation be presented for display purposes only and the sheet cake actually be served. Bertz moved, Klober seconded the motion that the City Celebration Committee establish July 6 for a main birthday celebration activity to include a turkey barbeque, birthday cake and fireworks. The motion was approved by a majority vote, 10 members voting for and one against. The Jaycees are planning to have a major theme float in the parade. Mayor Bea Blomquist appeared and reported that a major grand opening of I -35E was planned for the fall by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. She suggested that the City tie into the opening with birthday related events such as a parade featuring various types of transportation used in Eagan during the past 125 years, bicycle races, etc. She has discussed the idea with Mr. Kermit McRae from MnDOT and he received the suggestion favorably. The exact date for the opening is not presently known and will depend on weather and possible labor strikes. However, MnDOT estimates that they will be able to set a date sometime in June. As of now, the first week in November is the most probable. Budget/Funding Discussion was held concerning methods of sculpture. Partial funding could come from sale tree. Funding contributions could also be businesses and industries. 2 funding the Lone Oak Tree of souvenier pieces of the solicited from residents, • 9- Cost estimations were given. It was estimated that the total firework display would cost $3,000, part of which would be picked up by the carnival. The birthday cake was estimated at $450. Advance costs for the turkey barbeque were approximately $2,000. A float would cost approximately $200 and satellites approximately $400. Bertz volunteered to act as treasurer to handle funds. It was suggested that the next meeting concentrate on the subject of budget, money needed up front, and fund raising and marketing ideas. The Eagan Police Association is interested in selling T—shirts, hats and balloons. A representative of the association will be invited to the April meeting. Bartz moved and the motion was seconded to authorize the total sum of $3,000 toward a fireworks display. All voted in favor. Miscellaneous Discussion Voracek suggested that the official unveiling of the sculpture be timed with the I -35E opening. Bergh moved and the motion was seconded that the City • work with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Chamber of Commerce for a celebration, possibly to include a parade, another cake and bike races, as a part of that opening. All voted in favor. The possibility of having souvenier sales of wood from the Lone Oak Tree at the library was suggested. The Friends of the Library will be contacted after it is determined whether or not the sculpture will be performed at the library. Rod Smith and his woodworking students are making 20 Lone Oak Tree souvenir clocks which they will donate for fund raising purposes. Masin reported that the Parks and Recreation Department of the City sponsors "Summer in the Park" concerts/ entertainment events on Wednesday evenings during the middle of the summer. She suggested that the event scheduled for either the Wednesday preceding the 4th of July or following it could be tied into the celebration. Another possibility was to change the date of one of the programs to July 6 and to hold it in conjunction with the celebration. The committee favored the July 6 date. Masin will check with the Parks and Recreation Department. The next meeting was scheduled for April 1, 1985. Members are to bring in fund raising ideas and to contact various civic organizations to see it they would be willing to help in the celebration. A representative from the Mendota Heights Lions Club was to be invited to the April meeting. Harries moved and the motion was seconded to appoint Richard Bartz as treasurer of the committee. All members voted in favor. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:00 p.m. Date: March 13, 1985 -4 14,-3 hnd ©F 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A- SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES CIN Abmirksuatar EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE 01, Clerk Traditionally, the Fourth of July commemorates the birthday of the United States of America. This year, events celebrating the 125th birthday of the City of Eagan will be added to the festivities. The theme of the long holiday weekend will be Eagan's birthday party and major events are being planned not only for Thursday, the actual14th of July, but also for Saturday, July 6. The City Celebration Committee, appointed by the City Council to design and organize events, has announced tentative plans for the weekend. In addition to Thursday's traditional parade and fireworks, an all -day community party is proposed for Saturday, July 6. Possible highlights include a turkey barbeque, giant birthday cake, speeches, entertainment and a second fireworks presentation. A carnival and food booths will operate through the entire weekend. The committee is seeking to involve as many residents as possible in these events and is asking that any groups or individuals wishing to participate contact the city administrator's office, 454-8100, and volunteer their services. THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 1A IL Organizations which have already volunteered include the Fourth of July Association, the Volunteer Fire Department, the Eagan Lions, the Eagan Jaycees, the Ministerial Association, the Minnesota Valley Exchange Club, the Eagan Chamber of Commerce, the Optimists Club, the Friends of the Library and the Police Auxiliary. Members of these organizations should contact their chairperson to specifically offer their services for the city celebration events. • In addition to the above events, the publication of the Eagan history book, "Lone Oak Years," is planned for this summer and a major carving utilizing the trunk portion of the historic Lone Oak Tree will be an ongoing event. The committee is also planning a major event to bE held in the fall of the year. -30- 4/2/85 • Contact: Holly Duffy, 454-8100 HAUGE, SMITH & Dim. P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PAUL H HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE RALPH W. COREY February 18, 1985 Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Cedar Cliff Bank Facility - Pylon Sign Dear Mr. Hedges: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 4564224 At the February 5, 1985 City Council meeting, the City Council approved a conditional use permit for a pylon sign to be erected on Cliff Road for the drive-in bank facility planned at that location by Federal Land Company. This approval was subject to an opinion from our office affirming that the Sign Ordinance does not prevent the erection of such a sign. The question is whether City Code, Section 4.20, Subd. 6.c. relating to Area Identification Signs for Shopping Centers and Other Major Complexes prevents erection of the sign. Section 4.20, Subd. 6.c. reads as follows: • "C. Major Complex. when an area identification is required, such as for • a shopping center, major apartment complex, or major industrial building, up to one free-standing or pylon sign may be allowed for each major industrial street. The Council shall determine the maximum size after reviewing the applicable conditions including terrain, safety factors, etc." This Section must be read in conjunction with Section 4.20, Subd. 6.b. which allows up to one pylon sign per building. The proposed sign for the drive-in bank facility is not intended to be an area identification sign relating to a major complex, and for this reason, it would come under Subd. 6.b., rather than Subd. 6.c. Consequently, the proposed sign is allowable under the ordinance. It is true that there is already an area identification sign erected for Cedar Cliff Shopping Center, near the corner of Nicols Road and Cliff Road. However, since the bank is a separate building, it would still be allowed its own sign under Subd. 6.b. Because Subd. 6.c. allows a certain number of signs per major adjacent street rather than per building, we interpret Subd. 6.c. i Ai_ Thomas Hedges February 18, 1985 Page 2 not as a substitute for Subd. 6.b. whenever a building is part of a major complex, but rather as authorization for more than one sign per building in a very limited number of circumstances. For these reasons, it is our opinion that the proposed pylon sign for the drive -up bank facility near Cedar Cliff Shopping Center is not in violation of the Sign Ordinance. • BS:ras a 167 Very truly yours, HAUCE, SMITH 6 EIDE, P.A. Bradley Sm Assistant City Attorney MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNr[TG COMMISSION CHAIRMAN, CHUCK HALL ALL MEMBERS OF ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 27, 1985 SUBJECT: PLATTING & PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CONCERNS At the joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting that was held on January 29, a number of guidelines and directions were discussed relative to development philosophy as it pertains to to the planned growth of our community. Both the City Attorney and I were able to record a number of notes from that meeting and review a list of concerns that were discussed at the joint meeting with the City Council. The City Council did review our list and with some minor modification has asked that these notes be shared with members of the Advisory Planning Commission. The following is an attempt to summarize some of these concerns: 1. The suggestion was made that there be minimum standards, e.g., 10,500 s.f. per lot due to the fact that there have been numerous applications requesting variation from the 12,000 s.f. minimum single-family lot size, with no slid- ing scale for the lot size designations. 2. There should be a balance of housing afforded including size of lot, price of housing, quality of construction, condominiums, townhouses, single-family, and multiple -fam- ily projects. E 3. It was suggested an inventory of lot sizes be prepared by the City Planning Department that could be updated period- ically that would reflect existing zoning, existing plat- ting, existing housing, vacant lots within the various residential categories. • 4. Within the guidelines mentioned above, there should be an indication of whether the low and moderate income level housing is being complied with as prescribed in the Compre- hensive Guide Plan. 5. The revised Comprehensive Guide Plan that will be prepared during 1985 should reflect residential land use designa- tions that do not create confusion among the public regard- ing planned use densities as opposed to specific zoning categories. 6. The proposed plat should maintain landscape compatibility in order to retain the terrain features to as great an extent as possible. The proposal should be reviewed to determine if it is amenable to the physical setting of the property prior to the development. 7. The Advisory Planning Commission should review each pro- ject submitted to it for approval and make specific recommendations based upon policy guidelines set up by /a 'Y' MEMO TO APC MARCH 27, 1985 PAGE TWO the City Council and comprehensive plan guidelines and the City Council will review each of the applications based upon the recommendations of the Advisory Planning Commission and the guidelines prescribed by it. 8. There were specific concerns about variations from the minimum setback requirements, street width standards and the use of planned development to allow a reduction in minimum lot sizes under the City ordinance and policies, 9. Impact upon schools, traffic loads and compliance with minimum safety standards, and impact upon available and • proposed park development should be included in the plan- ning reports submitted to the reviewing bodies. 10. Whether the variations from the strict standards should be allowed in the event that the development is in the nature of a transitional use between two non -compatible land uses. After reviewing the aforementioned concerns with the City Council, it was their determination that this list should be used by the Planning Department and Commission to provide some philosophical guidance regarding future development. The future and long-lasting image of the City will be molded during the next several years and it is important to work closely as a staff, planning commission and City Council as it relates to the long-term development philos- ophies. Hopefully this will help provide some of the specific guidance the Planning Commission would appreciate while reviewing . future applications. \ I r�'I �` � l � II=al I 1 City Administrator V CC: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers Dale Runkle, City Planner Rich Hefti, Acting City Engineer Ken Vraa, Director of Parks & Recreation Paul Hauge, City Attorney Dale Peterson, Chief Building Inspector TLH/kf AGENDA METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING March 26, 1985 7:30 P.M. • 6040 28th Avenue So., Minneapolis, MN 1. Call to Order, Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on February 26, 1985 3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications 4. Technical Advisor's Preferential Runway System Utilization Report and Complaint Summary Report 5. Persons Wishing to Address the Council 6. Minutes of Operations Committee Meetings: March 6 and 20, 1985 • 7. Minutes of Executive Committee Meeting: March 21, 1985 8. Minutes of Legislative Committee Meeting: March 20, 1985 9• Dave Kelso: State Noise Standards 10. Report of MASAC Representative to MAC Meeting on March 18, 1985 11. Other Items Not on Agenda 12. Adjournment Next Meeting Date: April 23, 1985 /le? M • • MINUTES METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING February 26, 1985 7:30 P.M. Minneapolis, Minnesota 1. Call to Order, Roll Call. Chairman Walter Rockenstein called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and asked the secretary to call the roll. The following members were in attendance: Ben Griggs (R) Bob Johnson (R) Marty Thon (R) Jack Spalding (A) Bill Summers (R) Niel Atkinson (R) James McLaughlin (A) Ron Glaub (R) Jeff Hamiel (R) John Richter (R) James Serrin (R) Roylene Champeaux (R) Walter Rockenstein (R) Dennis Schulstad (A) Steve Cramer (A) Scott Bunin (R) Eugene Bohmert (R) Donald Priebe (R) Donald Fondrick (R) Larry Shaughnessy (R) Tom Baker (R) Bob O'Brien (A) Juan Rivas (A) Martin Silvi (R) Northwest Airlines Republic Airlines Eastern Airlines United Airlines USAirlines Air Line Pilots Association Air Llne Pilots Association Minnesota Business Aircraft Association Metropolitan Airports Commission City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis City of St. Paul City of St. Paul City of Richfield City of Richfield City of Mendota Heights City of Eagan City of Burnsville City of Burnsville City of Inver Grove Heights MASAC Minutes -2- February 26, 1985 Advisors Les Case Federal Aviation Administration Commissioner Barbara Ashley Metropolitan Airports Commission Darrell Weslander Technical Advisor Joan Vandersloot Secretary Guests J. K. Nelson Bloomington Doug Koehntop St. Anthony Village Larry Hartman Minneapolis John Seitz Minneapolis Dave Kelso Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Commissioner Jan Del Calzo Metropolitan Airports Commission George Volsky Buffalo Airways 2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on January 22, 1985• • The January 22, 1985 minutes were approved as presented. 3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications. Letters were received from the following: Michael Brucciani regarding the noise log; a third grader requesting information about airport noise; and the City of Bloomington reappointing Robert Mood and Mark Mahon as MASAC representatives, and Neil Peterson and John Pidgeon as alternates. 4. Technical Advisor's Preferential Runway S n Report and Complaint Summary Report. The reports for the month of January were presented by Darrell Weslander. • 5. Persons Wishing to Address the Council. Steve Cramer reminded MASAC of the importance of responding to the South Minneapolis Airport Action Council (SMAAC). It appears they are waiting for further discussion of the proposal sent to the MAC and FAA. Dave Kelso also mentioned that the Pollution Control Agency has received numerous calls regarding this issue. Larry Hartman, a member of SAAAC, referenced an amendment to the proposal which will be forwarded to the MAC in time for the next scheduled Executive Committee meeting. 6. Minutes of Operations Committee Meetings: February 7 and 21, 1985• The February 7 Operations Committee Meeting was briefly outlined by Darrell Weslander. It was primarily a planning and organizational meeting. A package of relevant • • MASAC Minutes -3- February.26, 1985 material was mailed to all Operations Committee members for the February 21 .meeting. Due to a scheduling difficulty, the February 21 meeting was postponed to March 6. 7. Monthly Complaint Report: Method of Tabulation. The manner in which complaints are received and tabulated was the topic of much debate, and it was the general consensus that the method of recording complaints be standardized. It was moved by Jeff Hamiel and seconded by Scott Bunin that only those complaints received by telephone or in single event letter be accepted and counted in the monthly reports. Complaints received in monthly "log" form will not be tabulated or included in the reports. The motion passed unanimously. In addition, it was moved by Bob the records show the number of "logged'' Johnson and seconded by complaints from Larry Shaughnessy Ina April 198x+ through January 1965. The motion passed unanimously. The complaints received in log form for the previously mentioned months are as follows: Number of Complaints Number of Complaints Month Submitted on Logs Month Submitted on Logs April 14 September 16 May 20 October 21 June 17 November 26 July 50 December 29 August 29 January 13 8. Minutes of Executive Committee: February 4, 1985. The minutes of the meeting were presented by Walter Rockenstein who stated that the objective was to prepare a response for the South Minneapolis Airport Action Council (SAAAC) at the April MASAC meeting. 9. Noise Abatement Plan Yearly Report: Discussion. Regarding the status of the revised Yearly Report, Jeff Hamiel reported that Nigel Finney, Director of Planning b Engineering, has been in contact with Howard, Needles, Tammen and Bergendoff. Meetings between Mr. Finney and HNTB will be forth coming. 10. Report of MASAC Representative to MAC Meeting on February 19, 1985. Walter Rockenstein informed MASAC of the relevant issues presented at the MAC meeting, February 19. The following items were discussed: (1) the purchase of noise monitoring equipment; (2) the Operations Committee's lease policy at reliever airports; and (3) the Ad Hoc committee on terminal facilities use, which could eventually affect us all, particularly in terms of the number of operations generated. //3 MASAC Minutes -4- February 26, 1985 12 Other Items Not on Agenda. Dennis Schulstad stated that Denver has plans to close Stapleton Airport within the next decade and build a new facility in an area that would be unaffected by noise as there are no homes or industry in the vicinity. A few days later, however, he read an article about a builder who bought acres of land around the site to develop 1600 single family residential homes. George Volsky, an attorney representing Buffalo Airways, addressed MASAC regarding the use of Boeing 707 (Stage 1) aircraft in to and out of MSP. Buffalo is appealing to MASAC and requests its assistance in allowing them to continue serving the market through April 14, 1985• MAC is in the process of getting an injunction against Buffalo Airways which would prohibit them from flying their 8707 equip- ment into MSP. After the presentation by Mr. Volsky, numerous questions, answers and comments, it wasmoved b John Richter and seconded by James Serrin that MASAC endorse the resolution -5 which was previously passed and implemented into a Field • Rule and enforce the rule. The endorsement would mean Buffalo would not be allowed to continue its flights. A roll call vote was taken and the results are as follows: Ayes: Niel Atkinson, Air Line Pilots Association; Jeff Hamiel, MAC; John Richter, Minneapolis; James Serrin, Minneapolis; Roylene Champeaux, Minneapolis; Walter Rockenstein, Minneapolis; Scott Bunin, St. Paul; Eugene Bohmert, St. Paul; Larry Shaughnessy, Mendota Heights. Nays: None Abstentions: Ben Griggs, Northwest Airlines; Bob Johnson, Republic Airlines; Marty Thor, Eastern Airlines; Jack Spalding, United Airlines; Bill Summers, USAirlines; Ron Glaub, Minnesota Business Aircraft Association; Don Priebe, Richfield; Don Fondrick, Richfield; Tom Baker, Eagan. . Also, let the record show that the airline company members of MASAC did not participate in the discussion of this issue. One other item discussed was the Noise Rule. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency feels it is ready to enter into a non -controversial rule making procedure. Official notice will be in approximately 3 weeks. The issue was referred to the Legislative Committee of MASAC. Adjournment. The,meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Joan Vandersloot MASAC Secretary 14 1984 'old -Chamberlain Field tilt un -ups 0 iiscellaneous 4 __4T_ 1985 old -Chamberlain Field 108 un -ups 1 iscellaneous 17 Total 126 iiscellaneous complaints In- ludes helicopters and secon- lary airports. Crystal 1 Holman 13 Miscellaneous 3 17 C>t apple Valley tloomington lurnsvllle :ottage Grove :agan Inver Grove Heights lendota Heights Unneapolis tichfieId ;t. Paul TO 2 8 17 1 12 3 1 37 11 2 t7i r LOG jJ 0 �1 0 0 0 5 1 I 6 14 MINNEAPOLIS 4o 30% 18% 7 t 11t ORICHFIELD/ BLOOMINGTON HOURLY PERCENTAGE USE OF RUNWAYS O • PAUL/HIGHLAND PARK MENDOTA HEIGHTS/ EAGAN OPERATIONS SUMMARY - Itinerant: Air Carrier Commuter General Aviation Military MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Local: Civil Military FEBRUARY, 1985 Total Average Dally Opns 1985 /1984 626 518 79 133 175 176 21 14 31 30 0 0 932 / 871 CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE (AC) 762/65n 141 122 of these are 3rd level carriers utilizing prop aircraft. MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1 MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL COMPLAINT RECORD Nighttime Number of Excessive Structural Activity Restricted Ground Low Secondary Date Complaints Noise Disturbance Interruption Hours Run -ups Noise Flying Airports Miscellaneous 1 6 3 2 3 0 - -- 1 - 1 2 4 9 4 - - I - 1 - 5 2 1 - - - - - 6 4 2 7 4 I - - 3 - - - - - 8 4 2 9 0 - JN 10 1 11 2 12 0 I 2 13 7 1 - 14 4 3- 15 4 16 1 17 0 18 1- 19 2 20 6 3 - - 2 - 1 - - 21 2 1 - - - 1 2 - - - - - 2 4 22 11 3 - _ 23 1 1 - - - - - 24 7 3 - 2- 25 13 9 - -- 26 4 2 - - - - - - - 27 21 13 - 4 - - 1 3 - - - 28 9 5 - 2 1 - 1 - - TOTAL 126 60 - 14 18 1 5 11 14 3 FEBRUARY, 1985 NOISE COMPLAINTS by Category and Time of Day During February the following complaints were recorded: • Category Number Percentage Excessive Noise 60 48% Activity Interruption 14 11% Nighttime Restricted Hours 18 14% Run -ups 1 1% Ground Noise 5 4% Low Flying 11 9% Secondary Airports 14 11% Miscellaneous 3 2% 126 100% Time Number 2400 - 0559 11 0600 - 1159 47 1200 - 1559 18 1600 - 1959 13 2000 - 2359 16 CAP 21 126 ��7 Brief description of assisted housing programs: 1. Section 8 Existing: Eligible low and moderate income households pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for uti- lities) for rent in market rate rental units. The Dakota County HRA (or South St. Paul HRA) pays the rest. The rental units must pass federal inspection standards and the rent plus an allowance for utilities paid by the renter, must not exceed established Fair Market Rent limits. 2. Moderate Rehab: The Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation program offers owners of rental property assistance for making building repairs which will bring their properties into compliance with Housing Quality Standards. The owner, in turn, agrees to rent to households eligible for Section 8 Rent Assistance. The rental of these units is coordinated through the Dakota County HRA and the rent payments for the tenants is the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available. 3. Section 8 New Construction: The developers of these units receive a subsidy Tor construction of these units. The owners in turn, are required to rent these units to eligible low and moderate income households. The rental payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. These rental deve- • lopments are owned by private developers. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available except for Section 202 projects for senior citizens. 4. Low Rent Housing: The Dakota County HRA (or South St. Paul HRA) owns and manages the housing units offered through the Low Rent Housing Program. These housing units are rented to eligible low and moderate income house- holds who pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for utilities) for rent. 5. 235 Home Ownership: This program offered assistance to eligible low and moderate households for purchasing a home. The program is no longer available. 6. 236 Rental: The developers of these units receive a subsidy for construc- tion of these units. The owners, in turn, are required to rent these units �. to eligible low and moderate income households. The rental payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available. // e I SECTION 8 1 MODERATE I SECTION B REW I LOW REIT 1 235 H ME 1 2.36 RENTAL I CURREiIT I I EXISTING I REFAB I CONSTRUCTION I F0USIIG I FPMILY I FA"ILY I TOTALS GAAI:O' COMMUNITIES I ELD FAMILY TGTALI ELD FPMILY TOTA'_! ELD FA' TOTALI E!D FA 1LY TO?PLI TOTAL In. I E'_D FP?:?LY 7iiA:i -----------------------I------------------ I ------------------I------------------ I -----------------I------------ I------------'---------- APPLE VALLEY 1 -----------------------I----------------I------------------I------------- 8 c"9 37 1 0, 0 0 f 0 56 76 1 0 43 43 !. 0 1 0 1 8 123 135 1 BURNSVILLE 1 ---- -------------------- I------------------ 59 103 162 1 I 0 -------------- 0 0 I ---I 0 87 -I------------- 87 ! 0 55 ----I------------I------------I------------------� 56 1 0 1 180 1 59 426 485 ! EA_A;Y I ----------------------I------------------1-----------------I------------------ 21 127 148 1 0 0 0 1 ------------------ 0 33 ;------------------- ',3 '--- 0 15 1 15 ! --- ------- I ------------ I -------- ----------' 0 1 14 1 2. 313 ---------------' 34;� I FARMIN'GTOII I 26 33 53 1 0 0 0 1 6G 0 � 60 I -------....-----!------------ 0 2 2 1 I ------------'-- 1 '25 --------- --------------I------------------ I ----------------- .4 a I BS 33 I HASTINGS 1 47 130 177 1 4 14 ! 18 1 ------------------ 109 a 109 1 ------------------ 0 13 ' 10 1 ----------- 0 10 1Et IS% 3i4 I ----------------------- 1----------------I------------..-----I ------------------ �-;VER GROVE o 30 147 ill 1 0 0 0 1 0 -a I----------- 40 1 0 I 5 i ------------I------------,1------------------ , '^23 31 4- LP.VEU:'LLE1 13 37 50 1 0 0 0 1 24 0 24 1 0 6 6. 2 I 0 1 37 45 .2 I -----------------------I----------------- ' ------------------ -----------------;------------------ I------------ I------------ I-----------------=1 LILYDALE 0 0 t 1 0 0 0 1 a 0 a l 0 it a l a 1 0 1 0 1 ----------------------I------------------ I ------------------ ! NENDOTA 1 3 0 3 1 0 1 1 1 ------------------I------------------I------------I------------I------------------- 0 r. 0 1 a Z 0 1 0 0 J 4 i ------------------------ MENDOTA HEIGNTS I ------------------ 2 0 I------------------- a ------------------ ------------------- I------------ {------------- 1----------------- i 0 1 1 1 0 i2 12 I 0e" 0 1 0 1- 0 i ----- —-------- ---------I---------------I-----------------I ROSEMOUNT I 6 27 33 1 0 ------------------ I ------------------I--- ------- I ------------ I ----- —_----------- -----------------------I------------------ 0 0 1 33 28 67 1 0 30 31t 1 2 1 0 i 45 87 .32 1 SOUTH ST. PAUL + 1 31 145 I 176 1 ------------------ 0 0 t ! ------------------ 0 44 I ------------------ 44 1 30,0 S I 3:3 ------------I------------i------------------ i ------------------------ ------------------ i I 2 I 531 19. :.__ . SU°ISH LAKE I 0 0 I 0 1 ------------------- 0 0 ------------------I-----------------I------------ 0 1 0 a 0 1 0 0 0 1 ------------- -----------------i 0 S I t 0 ------------------------I---------------- 1 WEST ST. PAUL 1 ------------------------I--------------' 192 131 I 323 1 ----------------- 0 6 6 1 0 0 0 1 80 7 87 1 _ 0 1 0 1 F' 14i - 4. I OTHER 2 5 7 1 ----------- 0 ------I----------------------------------- 0 a 0 0 0! a 0 !------------ tt ------------ ---------------- 0 a —i ------------------------ I------------------ I------------------ I------------------ I------------------ !------------ I------------ I---------- -------1 TOTALS 1 I 436 914 1352 1 I 4 22 26 1 I 232 3011 52 1 I 380 174 554 1 I 41 1 526 1 1052 1'377 I 1 �- 3 �i 1 -------- —-------------- I-------------- ---I--- -- ----------- I------------------ I------------------ Brief description of Community Development Programs: 1. Weatherization: Through a joint effort of the Dakota County HRA and Economic Assistance, low-income homeowners and rental units occupied by low- income tenants are being weatherized to reduce the consumption of precious fuels, promote energy conservation, and reduce the burden of high heating costs on low-income county residents who can least afford rapidly rising utility bills. 2. MHFA Home Improvement Loans: The Dakota County HRA administers this State program as a Title I lender. Loans are made to eligible homeowners (adjusted gross income less than $24,000 annually) for code compliance items and certain general improvements. An interest rate of 3% to 11.5% is charged depending on the applicant's income. 3. MHFA Home Rehab Loan: These loans are made to eligible low-income homeowners adjusted gross income under $7,000 annually) for rehabilitation items that directly affect the health, safety, energy conservation and accessibility of the home. The interest rate is 3% and deferred loans are available to households with adjusted gross incomes under $6,000 annually. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 4. MHFA Home Energy Loan: These loans are made to eligible homeowners for energy items. The interest rate is 8% for homeowners with adjusted gross incomes of less than $24,000 annually and an interest rate 9% for those with adjusted gross incomes of more than $24,000 annually. This program is admi- nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 5. Rental Rehab: Rental Rehabilitation loans are available to owners of rental units. There are no income or asset limitations. The loan amount cannot exceed $15,000 per one dwelling unit and for structures with more than one unit the loan limit is $7,500 per unit with a maximum of $37,500. The interest rate on the loan is 11%. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 6. CDBG Rehab Loan: Various housing rehabilitation programs have been done using Community Development Block Grant funds. They have assisted low and moderate income homeowners in making repairs to their homes with low interest loans and grants (grants are no longer available). This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 7. MHFA Solar Bank: Deferred loans are given to eligible low and moderate income homeowners for energy items. The eligible homeowners are referred from Northern States Power Company and Minnegasco. This program is admi- nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 8. 312 Loans: These loans are given to eligible owners of residential struc- tures at an interest rate of 3%. The loan funds must be used to bring the property into compliance with local codes, rehabilitation standards and some types of general improvements. Commercial and mixed use (commercial and residential) properties may apply for loans with an interest rate of 9%. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA in HUD approved target areas. /ZO 0A40TO CCNTY HAA CO'.VIITY OEVELONVIT REPORT MAY 1976 -FEBRUARY 1985 1� r r r r r oENTAI PEIIFB LOA'! 1 VJITP.RI7ATIC4 I MHFA HIM 14`ROV LCA.H I P.lfA HCP._ REHAB LOAN 1 MRA HO.. _YERGY LON I I GRAB 4Ck! P - qq qq SfGPR HJ • > pG �B�d'_IL.FP- EG�'J6 CCl:HLMITIES _------------ I CLO FM. TOT(M.I ELO LG SM ICTALI ELO LG SE TOTAL] ELO LG SM TDtP I ELO LG Se 701AL I E19"' M 10TPLI�ELU S.F}.1 ELO O7AL, APPLE VALLEY I____ p__I ____ I 1 3 1 59 1 62 I ____ I 1 1 ___ I 0 1 ____ I 3 1 __ I _____ 4 1 I e I ----- I 0 I ____ I ____1 0 1 0 1 ____ 1 e l _____ I 1 1 ----- I----- 4 1 I 5 1 _____ I P I ----- I 0 1 ----- I ____I 0 1 0 1 _____I ___ 0 1 I ----- 0 1 I 0 1 _____I ____ 0 1 I____ 0 1 I 0 1 ___-I e 1 ----- I----- 0 1 I C 1 _____ _____ e l e I ____ 1 _ e 1 ____ 1 2 1 L1IRNSVILLE 1 151 le? 11241 PI 11 21 31 11 01 41 51 C I CI 11 11 41 01 CI 01 t 1 C1 31 41 It 21 CI ?I C I 21 e1 21 CW.12N FALLS 111 c'1 31 P1 01 01 P1 21 01 11 11 P1 01 01 r1 CI CI PI PI e CI CI "I OI 21 e! 21 c! C! 2 P: CI CASTLE RUCf _—_-____—__ I e1 41 41 I ___ I—_I --I 01 ___ I—_I 01 11 --- I II __ I ----I 01 11 ____ I II _—__ I __I 21 01 --- I PI ---- _ I PI ____ I PI e1 PI 01 BI 01 01 21 01 e! 21 el 4! 21 e PI 21 CI EAEAN 141 401 521 PI II 51 6I 3I 11 11 51 01 11 --- 21 I 31 -----; PI __-_! 21 _____I ____ e1 I 21 ---- I _____ 11 I _____ II I 21 _____I --- 41 .I ----- e1 ;----- e1 I 2! ____ ____; 01 PI ______ ______ a 2' ______ ____; n,1 CI ____I___I—__I_____ ___I_____ _ ----- ___I—_I____I----- I ----- I_____I----- ! ----- I____I___I—_I____I____;___I—__I----- I----- I___._I _____; ----- ----- FA,------- _____—_______ I 19 I 93 I Ill I 1 __— I ----- _____ I____ P I I 2 1 ____.I 7 1 ____ 9 1 __—I _____ 2 1 1 1 __ __ I 4 1 _____ __—I____ 7 1 2 1 1 1 !0 I 13 I 0 1 P I 2 1 P I 5! ! I ! I 7! 2 1 2. P I .. .. .. . � .. - HP5T1_tr.5 ___ i 39 96 135 5 6 19 r I 21 I 4 t 11 1 36 I 1 1 ____ 2 1 _____ I _____ IL I 1 11 I _____ I 4 1 ____ I 1 1 _____ I ____ 5 1 I :4 I --_I _____ !3 1 I __.._ 7 1 I !B I __—I _____ >_0 1 I _____ 2 1 I e I _ ___; 2 1 _._.-;.__ 2 1 _-t ! _ ____; _ 4 ___-!... ?' _.; _____; __ Par_TP!____I___1_ i_13_i 13-i_J. i__@_i__ 2_i_—z_I___3 i_—e-i --- 1_I --- IP I --- B.I__s_I_B _I_.__ I__a_I_. I _____ a_ e_ e I n I 1 I 1 1 2 1 0 1 2! e I ?! e I c l C 1 n_; I INNER 6OOVE I 19 I 92 1 111 I 2 1 4 I 10 1 16 I 4 1 2 1 15 1 21 I 2 I P I 6 1 6 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 4 1 8 1 13 1 0 1 e I I I I t 2 1 C I C I I C I LiWEVILLE I 15 I 74 1 89 I P I C I 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 4 1 2! 6 1 6 12 2' r. 1 2 1 4 1 e l ? I S I C: 2! c l 2 1 -, .. n ... .. ----------- —_ I _____ I ____ I_ I____ I ___I ___ I ____ I -----1 _____!____ I ____ I _____ I _____ I ____ I _____1 ___ I _____ I _____ I_____ I _.--- I ____ I -----I _____! ___ I ____ LILYOPLE' I e 1 0 1 P I e 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 P I e I 0 1 0 1 C I 0 1 e 1 2! e 1 2 1 e l 2: e 1 0 1 e 1 C I C I C 1 2: C :: 2 1 c 1 - ME190TA 2 2 4 P P PI PI 2I 01 01 el PI CI CI CI PI CI 21 CI 11 "! CI :I CI el dl CI ! :i 2: :1 21 ME4.00TA HEIEHTSI-- B -1__!_I_!7 I P -I --1-I- 2 I' 3 I-- 2-I— 0_I-- 2 I- 4-I—_1 1 1? I--5-I-6I--1-1--e I--e-I-._t-1-2-1-----1----1--4 1— F C—I-- r-I--2 c l 2 1 C MIESVILLE I II 11 21 el C! 01 01 el 01 PI PI 21 c1 P1 e1 0! e: el el CI rt e nI -I-- e e r1 -1---e-i-`-- e -- I fi NORTHFIELD 1 4l 9 1 13_ 2 1 e l I I I I e I e 1 0 1 e I P I e I 0 1 e l 4 1 e 1 2 1 e I e I r I e I e I P 1 2 1 e 1 C: e l c 1 2 1 e C --RAVE." 1 01 0 1- 01'01 01 01 01-01 01'01 CI FI PI 11 'II 01 01 e PI el PI QI 01 e PI 21 PI CI CI cl 21 _; C: RANDOLPH 111 91 101 BI II II 21 e1 01 BI 01 21 !1 II 21 e1 e1 01 01 01 11 el II e1 21 21 PI e 01 e: PI e! POSEMOLSIT 1 7 1 44 1 51 1 0 1 1 1 6 1 7 1 6 1 0 1 Q I 6 1 P I P I 15 I 15 1 e l P I C I P I 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 2 1 e l c I e I e! [: ". I C I SOUTH ST. PAL! I 68 1 153 1 221 1 0 1 O I e 1 P I e l Q I 0 1 c I P I O I e I e I P I P I 2 1 P I e l 2! e I e I e l e l e I 4 1 e I C I c: C 1 C: SUNFISH LANE 101 01 0I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 01 01 01'01 21 21 CI 01 01 CI el 01 0I 01 31 01 11 21c ' cl 21 VERMILLION 101 31 31 01 01 CI 01 01 BI BI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 CI 01 PI 01 01 _____1_—I._...._.-.;-____; WEST ST.PPLL 1 47 1 56 1113 1 17 I 6 1 4:31 I 54 I 13 I 6 1 15 I 34 I 3 I P 1 12 1 15 I 19 I 0 1 12 : 31 1 56 I 15 I 54 I :25 1 3 I 0 1 2 1 2 1 : 1 9 1 C. 3 1 1,1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 70ipL5 I 1 I 1257 I 884 11111 I I I I I I 25 1 I I 23 I I 92 1140 I I I I 59 I I 16 I I 57 1132 I I I I 1 7 1 I I 6 1 I I 76 I I I 89 I I I 24 I I I I I 17 I I 42 I I I BSI I I 31 I I 93 1209 I I I I I B I I I 0 1 I I 5 1 I I 5 1 I I1 2 1 I 15 I I I 0 1 I I 2 1 I 1 19 I I 1� - o 1�